The URL can be used to link to this page

SLR2006-00008 r NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2006-00008 '� GERBER LEGENDARY BLADES : STREAM BANK STABILIZATION/WEIR REMOVAL ' ° � � 120 DAYS = 11/27/2006 SECTION I. APPLICATION SLTMMARY FILE NAME: GERBER LEGENDARY BLADES SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW CASE NO.: Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) SLR2006-00008 PROPOSAL: A request for Type I Sensitive Lands Review approval for a bank stabilization and weir removal project. APPLIC.ANT: Fiskars Brand IncJGerber Legendary Blades Attn:Marie Hagenlock 14200 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 OWNER Same as above LOCATION: 14200 SW 72�Avenue;WCIM 2S 112AA,Tax Lot 300. ZOIVING DESIGNATION: I-H: HeaW Industrial District. The I-H zoning district provides appropriate locations for intensive industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, railroad yards, waste- related and wholesale sales activities. Activities in the I-H zone include those which involve the use of raw materials,require significant outdoor storage and generate heavy truck and/or rail traffic. Because of these characteristics, I-H zoned property has been carefully located to minimize impacts on established residential, commercial and light industrial areas. APPLICABLE RE VIE W C�ITERIA: CommunityDevelopment Code C�apters 18390, 18.530, 18.725 and 18.775. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Director's designee has APPROVED the above request, subject to a condition. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTTC�OF TYPE I DEQSION SLR2006-00008-GERBERLEGENDARYBLADES STREAMBANK STABILIZATION/WEIItREMOVAL PAGE 1 OF 3 CONDITION OF APPROVAL HE LL WIN N I I N H L BE I FIE PRIOR TO SITE WORK: Su mit to e urrent amm�g ivision Emi y Eng, 503 718-2712 or review an approva : 1. The applicant shall provide evidence of approval by USACOE, State of Oregon DSL and C�ean Water Services. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information and Pro�osal Descri�tion: The applicant is requesting approval to stabilize two sections of actively eroding stream bank and remove a ,� concrete weir located within Ball Creek. The purpose of the project is to protect both banks of the stream ; from further erosion and to prevent further erosion from impacting the parking lot and structures. The project will be conducted in two phases: Phase 1 will involve repairing those areas that pose an immediate threat to the integriry of the parking lot; Phase 2 will involve a longer stretch of the stream bank and is expected to be completed in 2007. The applicant is requesting Type I Sensitive Lands Review approval for Phase 1 only. Phase 1 will involve moving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material. SECTIDN IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIAAND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Chapter 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) of the Tigard Community Development Code states: The Director shall review miiumal ground distu�ance(s) or landform alterations involving 10 to 50 cubic yarcis of material,except in the floodway area by means of a Type I�procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030 subject to compliance with all of the standards in this CFiapter. DRAINAGE WAY The extent an nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the use. The,purpose of the proposed land form alteration is to repair those areas that pose an immediate threat to the uitegrity of the parkuig lot. The proposed activity will involve moving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material as shown in calculations included wrth the ap lication (see file). The extent and nature of the proposec� land form alteration will not create site dis�ances to the extent greater than that required for the use. Therefore,this criterion is met. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property. The purpose of the proposed land form alteration is to prevent further erosion and other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to property. The applicant provides details of a bioengineered ap roach that will stabilize the banl�, address erosion and create a natural stream bank through the planting o�nauve vegetation. Therefore,this critenon is met. - . � NOTTC�OF TYI'E I DEQSION SLR200(r00008-GERBER LEGENDARY BLADES STREAM BANK STABILIZATION/WEIR REMOVAL PAGE 2 OF 3 The water flow capacity of the drainage way is not decreased. The proposed,proJ'ect was modeled for impacts to water capacity of the stream with and without the concrete weir ui place during different storm events. Results show that there is little difference in water flow capacity between the two scenarios. The study concluded that moving 13 cubic yards of material will not decrease the water flow capacity of Ball Creek. Therefore,this criterion�s met. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development,the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening. The overall project involves the planting of native vegetation.Therefore,this criterion is met. The drainage way will be re�laced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum fTow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. The a�plicant is removing a facility in the dra.inage way and does not propose to install a new facility. There ore,this standard does not apply. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands and Clean Water Services approvals shall be obtained. The applicant is in the process of receiving approval from USACOE, State of Oregon DSL and CWS. The applicant shall provide evidence of approval by iJSACOE, State of Oregon DSL, and G�1S as a condit�on of approval. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within anc� adjacent to the floodplain in acco�ance with the Comp rehensive Plan. This are shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. The proposed activity is not within the 100-year floodpla.in. Therefore,this criterion does not apply. SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Final Decision: T�us is a Type I Sensitive Lands Review As such,the Director's decision is final on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. The Director's decision may not be appealed locally and is the final decision of the City. THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 18, 2006 AND BE COME S E FFE CTIVE ON AUGUST 19, 2006. �es�t�ons: Ityo u have any questions please contact Emily E_ng in the City of T�'ig�ard Current Planning Division at (503) 718-2712 or sop byt�e office at Tigard CityHall, 13125 SW Hall Slvd,Tigard,OR 97223. A t 18 2006 AP O y ng ATE Assistant 1'lanner NOTTCE OF TYPE I DEQSION SLR2006-00008-GERBERLEGENDARYBLADES STREAMBANK STABILIZATTON/WEIRREMOVAL PAGE 3 OF 3 _ �Z a �� . i--� _ . - . = I� � � GEOGRAPIIIC INFORMATION SYSTEM r ^ DR V 1Q1V1� 1Vlt�l SANDBURG T �T D,�00/-00000 l�l\L V O GERBER LEGENDARY BLADE S N ER so _ G�, ti tio��y�z �� ti \ �� <�, 0 -o � y N n T �n � � 0 100 200 300 400 Feet � r 1'=307 feet i �O BONITA RD ' i Informalion on ihis map is for yeneral location only and should ba verifed with lhe DavelopmeM Services Division. 13125 SW Hall BNd Tigard,OR 97223 . (503)639-4171 http:!lwww.ci.Ggard.a.us Community Development Plot date:Jul 12,2006;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR CITY QF TIGARD ApF�''�VAd......... .................................................. 1 , Cond�t�onaliy Approved_...._._............................. UQ i �ar only the work as described in: �ee �etter to: Follow......_..___.�..................... [ ] � Attach........................__._......_..._... L ] ��` adf�rP, �� s -.�,,: _ ___�j�.�; � � -___, P B S 6,.„ � , � STAOINO AREA J �i '•��.:� i , f E ' I 1/ � ;��$ � ENOINEERINGANDENVIRONMENTAL ' .. � ^ % `\t � '.B� � 1�10MAINSTREET , � � �� .�:'�:'^ � V�NCWVER.WASHINGTON BB880 ` ; � AR�A1 -i,,: I PMONE'198o)6W.I7]t . ....,. . _.. . f ' � �:,��a: A. I Fnu:la5olev�eos+ EGEN 1 �',:�Y I nnv:�nnww.pesem.com 9 � BENCMMARK . ��, �� ' � � , � : � � , . � • WETLAND � ' i( � ..\. �......,....� = ACTIVITY/IMPACT AREAS :� ' �{:�I��, 1 A��A' - CROSS SECTION LOCAiION � �, ( ? � I x 4;� -.\. ��--�--- = OROWARY NICN WATERLINE � ��.�f'' � � � � EXISTING CONTOURS . . , .... AREA2 I,..tQ,�:'; I ti ; �` i ._\� �:.....-' ` '. ' I `� '� B, � $ I � , I VJ 8 � li, ' s� I W 8 ,� ;.r J�� w .� � � �� I � zz f .� � �_ � � ',. $� � y, � o � i \ i , � '� i 7 d t� y , i � � . '�{ , i � AA � _. . � ,r�, � ' � � � i� i � ' °� � ' � w � � ;o I i ; � oC� � , _ . ��\. �k ; � ° `" ... . . .: . ,, � ��,,*'n �i}"' '' � W � . fi i f � , . _ .. ... ...... .. . .... . STUDYAREA . �\��i ^� /YJ"• 1 C� , r I I �, � /I . `� I I I �� ! � Tl l—i�y T(r i_ __; �^f___r___ _ . Y . � .. � �_ — J r �_.. i %�: � ' ' J '. ' rnr�-�*? . ' r � ,�r„�� C '_ _C�, _`� �.r�' � e I ) 1°n4 � '_'.1„ `'y!_ l x S�G�[YRCfW .�...+._ �:.x.c.,., � ; , i , f - ' "' . •J T �9M.'W tl,.�:�.:t I: ... � � � � \ /�' ^' �1 �^'� __ y��-�.�.-� ��-�.,�_ � ._'�� :. .�,� / �' vy J! �� r _ I �W' �_-�__ y� ) ..� y j ;` �� . j � � EXISTINC CONCRETE WEIR '.� . � . �;{ ;�y I f i �� :"1 - WETIAND AREA=5194 SF �• � � 3 1 -�" � I iL----------------------------------------"------------------�--��---------------------------------------J NOTES: � ; 1.SURVEY PROVIDED BY STATEWIDE LAND SURVEYING.INC. r�o�«�a: FIGURE � 2.WETLAND BOUNOARY SURVEVED BY 5?ATEWIDE LAND SURVEYING,INC.SUPPLEMENTAL POINT LOCATION ��12 E COLLECTED BY PBS USING TRIMBLE GEOI(T GPS UNIT WITH SUBMETER POST PROCESSING ACCURACY. 6 50 - y "�„� Dam: sca�e�.r=w� 3.SEE FIOURE 4 FOR CROSS SECTIONS AND PROPOSED CONTOl1RS. ' JlJL1'200G 2S 112AA-00300 GERBERLEGENDARY BLADES 14200 SW 72ND AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISIO " , 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189_i�� 8 2006 50 3.63 9.4171 l503.684.7297 c�rr oFr�aaae CITY OF TiGARD OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPL{CATION PLANPJING/ENGINEERI�J� File# j, 6 ' r" Other Case# Date �j , t�- By� Receipt# 1� � City � Urb ❑ Date Complete �� ZY Z` (o � TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑AdjustmenWariance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III) ❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(!V) ❑ Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑Conditional Use (III) 0 Sensitive Lands Review(i, If or III) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑Historic Overlay(II or III) ❑ Site Development Review(Il) ❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or 111) . ress i avai a e 14200 SW 72nd Avenue Tax Map: 2S 1 12AA Tax Lot: 2S112AA0300 5 acres I_g Fiskars Brands Inc./Gerber Legendary Blades 14200 SW 72nd Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223 503-403-1251 503-620-3670 Marie Hagenlock 503-403-1251 is i more an one � Same as applicant � ' . � 'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be �purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The ners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. ease spea�c The applicant is proposing to stabilize two actively eroding sections of the streambank along Ball Creek �and to remove a concrete weir. The purpose of the project is to prevent erosion of the arkinq area. APPLICATlONS Wl�Z NOT SE ACCEPTED WITHOl1T Al.L OF THE REQUIRED StJBMITTA� E�EMENTS AS DESCRISED IN THE "SASIC SUSMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. .. .. THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: •- ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire conterits of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. . 7��$-O(o Own r's Signatu Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature . Date ' �- Z�-o� Ap icantlAg n epresentative's Signature Date ApplicantlAgentlRepresentative's Signature Date PORTLAND SEATTLE P B S ��C�IVE� �ANCOUVER EUGENE !UL Z � 2006 BEND TRi-CITIES TRANSMITTAL CITYOFTiGARD °LAf�NING/ENGINEERING DATE: July 28, 2006 TO: Emily Eng City of Tigard 13125 W Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 FROM: Tom Archer PROJECT NO: 70477.002 RE: Gerber Legendary Blades- 14200 SW 72nd Avenue,Tigard Type I Permit Review Attached is a Permit Application for a Type I Sensitive Lands Review for a bank stabilization and weir removal project on Gerber Legendary Blades property in Tigard, Oregon. The applicant intends to stabilize two sections of actively eroding streambank and remove a concrete weir located within Ball Creek. The attached drawing shows the proposed development. A Sensitive Area Certification Form as been submitted to Clean Water Services and the Service Provider Letter will be provided to the City as soon as possible. While Gerber Legendary Blades is the applicant, PBS Engineering and Environmental is acting as an authorized agent on behalf of Gerber. If you have any questions concerning this application or require additional information, please contact Tom Archer at 360-213-0443, toma(cr��pbsenv.com or at the address below. 1310 Main Street Vanr.ouver.WA 98660 360 690.4331 w�w 360.696.�J064 F�x 888.873.7273 Tou crxEe ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL www.pba�nv.com I Land Use Permit Application Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The proposed project involves stabilizing portions of the stream bank that threaten to erode an existing asphalt parking area on the Gerber property. The project will also remove a concrete weir from Ball Creek. The project is necessary to protect both the banks of the stream from further erosion and to prevent further erosion from impacting the parking lot or structures. The project will be separated into two phases; Phase I will involve repairing those areas that pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the Parking area and will be conducted this season. Phase II will involve a longer stretch of the stream bank and will be completed in 2007. We are currently only requesting approval for Phase I, to be completed during this work season. The total project(Phases I and II)will involve re-grading and modifying the existing stream channel for approximately 300 feet along the east and south boundaries of the parking area and will include the removal of an existing concrete weir. The stabilization area is between the north property boundary and the current location of the weir. The primary method will be to use reinforced earth -composed of lifts of native soil wrapped in filter fabric, which are then planted with riparian vegetation (e.g., willow). The resulting structure is resistant to erosion and provides shade and other benefits of a natural stream bank. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife has been consulted as to the presence of anadramous fish. They have determined that anadramous fish do not occur in this stream reach because of permanent downstream blockages to fish passage. A copy of their determination letter is attached. The proposed project will impact two areas experiencing active streambank erosion (Area 1,Area 2)and will involve the removal of a weir. All impacts will be below the OHW of Ball Creek. No wetland impacts will occur. Area 1 Acres: 0.0025 Volume of fill: 12.5 yd3 Dimensions: 27x2.5x5 Volume of removal: 8 yd3 Dimensions: 27x2x2 Area 2 Acres: 0.00076 Volume of fill: 5.5 yd3 Dimensions: 15x.25x4 Volume of removal: 2 yd3 Dimensions: 15x1.25x1.5 At both of these locations, the stream has eroded to within 3 feet of the edge of the asphalt parking lot. A backhoe will be used to excavate a trench one foot below the low water level. Woven fabric will be placed along the bottom of the trench,followed by non-woven fabric and one-foot of'/. inch washed angular rock. The fabric will then be folded back to enclose the rock and staked in place. Another piece of fabric will be placed, filled in with a six-inch lift of common soil, wrapped and staked. This process will continue until the soil lifts are level with the top of bank. At the top of bank, adjacent to the asphalt pavement a one-foot deep key trench will be placed and filled with common '/.minus washed angular rocks. Finally,topsoil and native grass seeds will be placed over the fabric for temporary stabilization. Fabric, soil, stakes, live stakes, topsoil, and seeding will all occur by hand. Live stakes (willows, dogwood)will be inserted at an angel between each soil lift. Work at Area 1 will also require the removal of existing concrete slabs. These will be removed using a backhoe and will be disposed of at an approved off-site upland location. Weir Acres: 0.0025 Volume of fill: 2.6 yd3 Dimensions: concrete: 12x6.5x4 � Report Date:July 2006 Project#:70477.002 PBS Land Use Permit Application Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon Volume of removal: 15 yd3 footing: 17x3.5x1 The concrete weir structure and iYs footing will be removed to an elevation that will match the existing contours of the bank and bed of the stream (see cross-section). The work area wili be isolated and dewatered using either sandbags or a portable dam system. Once the area is dewatered, the weir will be removed using standard excavation equipment operated from the shore. All concrete material and debris will be disposed of at an approved off-site upland location. The bank will be removed to 18 inches below existing grade, backfilled and reseeded. Any bare slopes will be seeded with native grass seed and will be staked with live stakes from Pacific Willow, Scouler's Willow, and Red-osier dogwood sources available on-site. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 18.530—Industrial Zoning Districts The site is located within a Heavy Industrial (I-H)zoning district. The purpose of the I-H zoning district is to provide appropriate locations for industrial uses. The proposed project will not impact the existing use at the site, nor impact the intent of the zoning district. No additional structures are proposed. 18.725—Environmental Performance Standards 18.725.020 General Provisions The applicant has submitted permit applications to the Oregon Department of State Lands and the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for work below the Ordinary High Water mark of Ball Creek. All terms and conditions contained within those permits will be complied with. Copies of the permits, once received, can be provided to the City if necessary. 18.725.30 Performance Standards The proposed project will not result in the creation of any visible emissions, vibrations, readily detectable odors, or increased glare and heat. The proposed project will not attract insects or rodents to the site. The project site is located within an industrial zone and is not adjacent to any"noise- sensitive units"as defined by Tigard Municipal Code 7.40.150.A. Noise associated with the proposed project will be limited to construction of the project. Equipment necessary for construction of the project will operate during the hours of 7 am and 7 pm. 18.775—Sensitive Lands Review The purpose of the sensitive land regulations are to maintain the integrity of rivers, streams, and creeks by, among other things, minimizing erosion and promoting bank stability (18.775.010.A). The project is being designed to address areas of active bank erosion along Ball Creek. The goal of the project is to stabilize the bank through addressing two sections of erosion. The bioengineered approach will stabilize the bank, address erosion, and create a natural stream bank through the planting of native riparian vegetation. 18.775.50 General Provisions for Wetlands A wetland is located in the southeast corner of the site where Ball and Carter Creeks converge and extends off of the site onto the property to the south and onto the ODOT right-of-way. Approximately one-half of the wetland extends off-site. Please refer to the enclosed wetland delineation report. No work will occur within the wetland. 18.775.70 Sensitive Land Permits The project site is not located within a floodplain. Slopes exceeded 25% in one area of the site, along Ball Creek from the concrete weir to the culvert where the stream leaves z Report Date:July 2006 Project#:70477.002 PBS Land Use Permit Application Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon the site due to the channelizing of the creek. No work is proposed in this area.The completed stabilization area will be seeded with a native seed mix. The majority of the proposed work will occur below the ordinary high water mark(OHW)of Ball Creek. The proposed landform alteration is necessary to address existing bank erosion and to stabilize the bank against further erosion impacts. The construction of the project will not disturb any other areas of the site. Currently, the erosion at both areas is within 3-feet of the edge of pavement and is threatening the integrity of the parking lot. The proposed project, by stabilizing areas of active erosion, will decrease sediment input to Ball Creek. During project design, the project was modeled for impacts to water capacity of the stream during different storm events with leaving the existing weir in place, and with removing the weir(approx. 47 cy). The modeling showed little difference in water capacity between the two scenarios. As such, it can be assumed that the fill/removal of 13 cubic yards along the streambank will not decrease the water flow capaciry of Ball Creek. 18.775.90 Special Provisions for Development within Locally Significant Wetlands and Along the Tualatin River, Fanno Creek, Ball Creek, and South Fork of Ash Creek. No work will occur in a Locally Significant Wetland. The vegetated corridor along Ball Creek at the project site is considered to be in"degraded condition". The corridor condition was determined based on the Natural Resource Assessment guidelines provided by Clean Water Services. Please refer to the enclosed Natural Resource Assessment Report. The applicant is not proposing a new development. The project will address an existing erosion and bank stability concern to provide protection to the existing parking lot. 3 RepoR Date:July 2006 Project#:70477.002 PBS •, -� �� ,•-: h .`� ► . 'i �1h . \ r.� � _.• �i/ s. �.1 � , p �, , � \ ` � rn7 �..� � i � . � � �•� � • ��1 l.L - '�•'iCii'� , •i ( � - � ; :�;I ��.�• n y,�. f ��f� ��a � . ,�� • . �� • - '�a J /�t�.}' p�! `.� O �, '� '1•-�ss=�i �• :•�� • � • . �I 4 ... . Y ,y. .f- . 1'' � r c ... ��r'. :±� �t �� ty�4: `g'� ��` •� • � � • h"�.N � •^• 4� � • � i 'M• '1 + � ' � �, ' �} �;r . �,� ' ` � � � '. __ . ' �. � ;i .� •�-�'�� •l. j � '�'!. �t .• �� • • • � .�r � I �� _L – –� 6 � �I . • •p� �,~• .._-. � # �z� � ,y;•• .�� . .., ' � � �� ;^'` .` Rc�h � _,�•• �� ',•�F•::;. � ,,•. , � ._ A T � � � :�� . _ � �_ �_ � ` . . ' �— — ;� 1 •1: � 'I '' \ �r'�� v �� ` .. �v�/� �.17��• L :�_ � Q _�__ �. r`�� ' •..' ` �„ � �I f � �.,,,,��,. .,��. •�-__ ,� r• a -: �y� �.` r ��',�':: , i . . � Z' '.� ' _ . — � z' �� ' '' . ' .''.: �'� -`—�r2'L�7t � �'�'/` �� .n �' _ A; _ �:- b � �� • 4/ � e .Hj!F/ / �,�� •��. .�� ' • ::,`� •.. � �/-�� -- - � � . . 39 � � ,�; . ; ..,.� �"��Y-- `,, � j�' ~_ , • �� ( t . """'� ^,, "-'_��s :r+ i'� St► �.�\ �`� � �� s• , • f`�' � 1 V ..�, ` • . y '�,...r--°- ,�UR �F ��` ` � .�1� . •� . � �i e �� '\ ` � �� - --�~� ., �� " . . . � � � tt : ,��i C� �►.-�. - ►'i_ - ;� � ' • p• � �_• � ' \ I� Project Area � � . _ J ,� � � � .� ,�; �•� ` 1 �-- o � � - - - .�t �_ ' —�_, i �;. .�_ _ _ - �~''�y "'i+: _ . .� ....° ,l � �_ �: - -- --. ,_ _ - ` , u •� � j � _- _ .- ��.��__ ,�a��_ • '', . �_ Yl• _ �:_ ;?,� n�-.._ � . I - � .; .�_ - s -i ' - -- •,,,. ; , .. ^�� --�• Boni :, `�� - � - --_--�_ :oQ -- ��. .� �� g��°/ �B'� ..., ' �jf `'/93 � '. .....J�• �� . � . • . � � � .+— - - - r--�-�".• ��£.` �� ' ��•�-,'- � W ? :•. .�• : � '�� • • • � � � —� 1 ' ''".' ' ' ' '�' " ' � � , -s= ':� c ' `'t ' N -+ , • . : .. � '!' + � .. . . . . �� '. J �L��` . '�,* � - • � '' s �.. � .• .-.��• �.•' •• I �Q � �G' � r �_ -_ r � ��{� ��!_-,�:. ._.. � -_ . �� _- w ..i � �,►,. • �,,i . � �I �1 4 ` � i, •_,� . x , �•_ . .�_` t , _. �_�� J '' .� �.. �,• p� •u 1� � •`j• � - � -�_..� �._ � rrlek. � �� r .' \ `$ p,�' - - � . •�� a oo '��: . � � ��: � ,��`' �2 � �` � � � . �- ` '•` ' -� • ,� i}� ` Tr=e r� '�a►. � �.ea - , h •.^`~ a�l+�, � Y 7 � t�"/ r �'-r;�,� �; • t� � '' �.'4�' . �s► . i I �' � s �....... � ;�! l ;a , •� r ; � y . = ij �" - t �� ;?a ,�� r. � .�:.. ! ;� � �f � O ' ` � , _h� � •��- , •�• � ' .•� � Q f � 'C�O '.��. �� ' ' a� �j'o �� s i ' � r� ' -� Yr - • �• • • • � •' ♦� ._ � v�,� � _'.,j _ . � �/ • "� _ ., N f,f•.. .. — ,, �� i ,, 4� �MI q r2+ .�� !�i � � '• :. - ' + �� 7�'� � � ` ..� ■&�&y �:'-,,\ ; �. _'- ♦ ''��,� '� ` � r93.�"� •� - :,, ��f - ..�.-�''f• � ` ' •� ~ �_ _ � �" !n � ` - • - --i••�' �� , �` �:; �� ' � �-.i �� i !' . '-�'�p .1d.. f= - ` \ J� .�}� � , � �# r � ��\ A ,:. ,y .`� �.�• � �-� /"'�� f_S � • �.� -�f-�, I• 1. •a � � � .: ' . �_ Gr ' e ■ °+ f •,' . � �� .. ° � � . . , r._. r � � . • �::•.r`� � � .. `�■ � ! '-- - ,• •• ' - • . Source-USGS Lake Oswego Duatlrangle OR,1981.Rewsed 19&4 or�i,na 'S�I�m •EUpen• N A P`°'�"" VICINITY MAP FIGURE �oa��.00z Gerber Legendary Blades P B S oa�e: 14200 SW 72nd Avenue 1 �uiy 2oos TIGARD, OREGON � ��' -- i �� ti�� , � -- ---� -- - � --, I ' �� '�`�� ti�� . - _ . � � > � r-- a_ , - .__ - - �� _ �_�/ � �� ` s I � �, — -,. - � �V � F�'-I - _ ' . , .�Si A �� , � - . � I _. � � . � �- -_._ ' � --- ' . y �.-1 ----_ _T2S TW 01 —, m s�� —� � - -- j - -- T2S R 06 �' � � i � I � ,� �+ m � ---- j �� _j�. �. � �, � TECH�E�ITEA , ` � . __ � � , — — — � � c� �� . V �r , - SF �� , � � j � ; � � � �� - f---� i , i � - --_ � 1rAAIDA4�,AK � _ ----- —� _ _ �— - _ I in ! � I �-MERB9WS �_ , -- - - i PROJECT i I�— i �- -- SITE --- - ,t, � �i � : - 02 —--- �; � _ � i - J I� --, ,' � � i - _ -_- . I � _.--__ _. � . . . . �, .____.._-__--_ .. _ . . . . _-_ - __-. ��gQH�TJ�. . S R1 W 12 ------ _ �--- - __ �� -- � = I 1=---�25 R1 E 07 � -- I � � ' -�� r _ �------� '� ---—_ _ � � � _ , - � � � - - � -- , �p ; � � r 0 — - - - � I `� , _. - �- � _� `_ _ _ � � � � ' ' _ I�T _ _ ^ I -I—�--'�- ,-- � ` - --GARC)!N L` , --- _-- i T �,_ _ _ _ _ --,, �- -._, i i � \ \ _ � ' /'�� /� N A 0 25� 5�� Feet PfOJeG" LOCATION MAP FIGURE �oan.002 Gerber Legendary Blades n p g 5 o�e 14200 SW 72 Avenue L ,luiy 20os TIGARD, OREGON f`',;;, .,� , ,,`�`�;��'t ��. ,.�, Department of Fish and WildIife _,�.t ��' ." ;;z.; O North Willamette Watershed District �_.'"' _. � �" _..�;' 18330 NW Sauvie IsIand Rd. 'Ibeadore R.Kulongoski,Governar G�`��?�'�>=�� Portland, OR 97231 Phone: (503) 621-3488 x 32 FAX: (S03) 62I-3025 OREGON � � F�+n a w�im�e. �� Tom Ar�r' PBS Engu�ing�d Envirarunerrtai 1310 Main St Va�uver,WA 98660 Subjet�: Carter�d B�1 Creek F��sh P�esence at Coerbe�r 1-IQ_ 11I�r. 14rche�', On Matrh 7�'you► 1, rep�:s�t�ives from Cleen Water Servioes, ar�d emplvyees of Gerber met to discuss optior�s for stabitizing the banks of Carter and Ball �s_ Cuire�rtly�he�e cxe�ek bantcs have resutted in damage fio the ad'jace[�t p�ing lot The site is loca#ed at'f 420U SW�, near the ooMiuenae �€cart�� c�s,�c o�� 2», �m�c�� company t�adquarte�s. s�oe that bme, ya,r�ve r�ced n,at me onegon Departmen�oF F�ish a�nd VYldliie m�ce a Nativ�e Migia�o►y Fish{I�MI{Fj Determinatiort for the sifie. This st�eam does not h�ave anadromous f�sh ch�e to �bartiratian 2�nd da�wnsh�earn cul�►e�ts_ The str�eam is«�mmptetely culvert�ed c�oownstream c�the site for appro�dmately _5miles. Otx maps do indicate Fu�eserx:e of NMF within these two cx�ee�cs; wdhin the project are�. D�ta is rrot atEached�this aoverage_ Hcw�rever, if is this status is still valid it would be e�ected that pr+esenoe v�ould be from a remnant�puiartion of cx�tthroat hou�t. lf thete are�Y�tions Ple�se r,a[f ine. lttiarilt you, �"��N—�.�� erin t. Si�rnons Habit�B�obgist 503-621-3488 x 3�2 .Yfj; .. . .. ' . . . , . . . . . . - . . . .- .. . . , RECEIVED iUL 2 8 2006 P B S ;;iTY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING Natural Resources Assessment Report Tax Lot 2S 112AA00300 Gerber Legendary Blades 14200 S�V 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon Prepared for: Fiskars Brands Inc. Gerber Legendary Blades Division Tigard, Oregon . . . . , �: � � � . . . � , . , ; , � .. : . � . - � � � , ; , ,�: . _ . . , _ '� �I Jul 2006 �310 Main Street Y Vancouver,WA 98660 Project#70477.002 ; 360.690.4331 MniN 360.6P6.9064 Fvc 888.873J273 ro��FHeE � ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ~ www.pbsenv.com � �— --- -------J � NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT Tax Lot 2S 112AA00300 Gerber Legendary Blades 14200 SW 72°`� Avenue Tigard, Oregon Prepared for - Fiskars Brands Inc. Gerber Legendary Blades Division Tigard, Oregon This report is for the exclusive use of the client and is not to be relied upon by other parties. It is not to be photographed, photocopied, or similarly reproduced in total or in part without the expressed written consent of the client and PBS. Prepared by PBS Engineering and Environmental 1310 Main Street Vancouver, WA 98660 (360) 690-4331 PBS Project No: 70417.002 July 2006 Naturai Resources Assessment Repc Gerber Legendary Blades Tax Lot 2S I 12AA00300 Tigard,OreKOn TABLE OF CONTENTS ]A INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................2 1.1 Regulatory Overview.................................................................................................................2 1.2 Project Location.........................................................................................................................2 1.3 Projcct Description.....................................................................................................................2 2.0 METHODS...................................................................................................................................3 2.1 Identitication of Sensitive Areas................................................................................................3 2.2 Evaluation of Vegetated Corridors ............................................................................................3 3.0 RESULTS .....................................................................................................................................4 3.1 Water Quality Sensitive Area ....................................................................................................4 3.2 Vegetated Corridor.....................................................................................................................5 3.2.1 On-site Vegetated Corridor................................................................................................5 3.2.2 Ott=site Vegetated Corridor...............................................................................................7 4.0 SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................7 5.0 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................9 _ TABLES Table 1 Vegetated Corridor Width Criteria Table 2 Vegetated Corridor Condition Standards Table 3 Vegetated Corridor Plot Data and Condition Ratings for the Gerber Legendary Blades Assessment Area— Tax Lot 2S 1 12AA00300 FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Water Quality Sensitive Area and Vegetated Corridor Map Figure 3 Base Map Site Plan APPENDICES Appendix A Wetland Delineation Report Appendix B Photographs Report Date:July,2006 Pruject:/{70477.002 PBS � Natural Resources Assessment Repc Gerber Legendary Blades Tax Lot 2S112AA00300 Tigard,Ore�on 1.0 INTRODUCTION Gerber Legendary Blades (Gerber) is exploring the possibility of strea�n bank stabilization on their manufacturing facility property in Tigard, Oregon. PBS Engineering and Environmental (PBS) was contracted to prepare a Natural Resources Assessment Report (NRA) for the subject property by Gerber Legendary Blades, to comply with the surface water management requirements of Clean Water Services (CWS). The Natural Resources Assessment Report is an evaluation of Water Quality Sensitive Areas, Vegetated Corridors, and steep slopes in the project area. Sensitive areas include: 1) existing and created wetlands, 2) perennial or intennittent rivers, streams, and springs, and 3) natural lakes, ponds, and in-stream impoundments. CWS has established design and construction standards, which when used in cambination with other state, federal, and local laws and ordinanees, are intended to protect the beneficial uses of waters within the Tualatin River Basin. 1.1 Regulatory Overview Clean Water Services requires that a Service Provider Letter be seeured by the applicant from the agency before approval of development activities within 204 feet of water quality sensitive areas. The Service Provider Letter specifies the conditions and requirements _ associated with sensitive areas and vegetated corridors (the buffers around sensitive areas). The standards, requirements, and methods for sensitive area site assessments are contained in Chapter 3 and Appendix C of the Design and Construction Standar°ds for Sanitary Sewer and Sti�rface Wate�-Management(CWS 2004). 1.2 Project Location The property is in Tigard, Oregon, southwest of the junction of Interstate 5 and Highway 217 and north of the junction of SW 72"d Avenue and SW Bonita Road (Figure 1). The 5-acre site (Tax Lot No. 2S 112AA00300) is in the NE '/ of the NE '/ of Section 12, Township 2N, Range 1 W, WM, Washington County, Oregon. The approximate center of the property is at latitude 45.41749° N and longitude 122.74584° W. The site is within the Ball Creek subwatershed of the Fanno Creek subwatershed of the Tualatin River. 1.3 Project Description Gerber is exploring plans to stabilize portions of the stream bank that threaten to erode an existing asphalt parking area on the Gerber site. The applicant is also proposing to remove a small concrete weir which is located immediately downstream of the confluence of Ball Creek and Carter Creek and has asked for this NRA Report prior to proposing a stream channel modification plan. 1.4 Assessment Area Clean Water Services requires an assessment of the property proposed for development and undeveloped areas within 200 feet of the project site. Report Date:July,2006 Project:#70477.002 PBS 2 Natural Resources Assessment Repc Gerber Legcndary Blades Tax Lot 2S 1 12AA00300 Tigard,OrcQon The property consists of a manufacturing facility with parking lots on the east and west sides and a driveway connecting them along the south side of the building. Vegetation lines the strcam corridors along the eastern and southern property boundaries. The property is zoned industrial and is surrounded by other industrial facilities on the north, west, and south. The Highway 217 onramp to Interstate 5 southbound is immediately east of the property. 2.0 METEIODS The natural resources assessment consists of three major tasks: identifying the sensitive areas, detennining vegetated corridor widths, and determining the condition of the vegetated corridors surrounding the sensitive areas. The initial phase of the assessment involved thc acquisition and review of existing information pertaining to the site. Intonnation was obtained from the following resources: • Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon (Green 1982) • Aerial photographs • USGS topographic map • Local Wctland Inventory • National Wetland Inventory • Metro Data Resource Center's MetroMap These resources were reviewed and used with field observations to identify water quality sensitive areas on or within 200 feet of the project site. Field visits to the study area were made on May 25, 2006. 2.1 Identification of Sensitive Areas All water yuality sensitive areas on the project site and within the 200-foot assessment area were identified and their limits were determined using the methods in Appendix C of the Design and Construction Standards (CWS 2004). 2.2 Evaluation of Vegetated Corridors The conditions, standards, and procedures used in the site assessment are described in section 3.02 Sensitive Area and Vegetated Corridor Standards and Appendix C: Natural Resource Assessments in the Design and Constr•uction Standards (CWS 2004). Vegetated corridor widths for the water quality sensitive areas were determined following methods and criteria presented in section 3.02.4 of the Design and Constr-arction Standards (Table 1). Report Date:July,2006 P B S ; Project:#70477.002 Natural Resources Assessment Repc. Gerber Legendary Blades Tax Lot 2S1 12AA00300 Ti�ard,OreQon Table 1. Vegetated Corridor Width Criteria. Land Slope W�dth of Vegetated Sensitive Area Definition Perpendicular to Corridor per Side Sensitive Area • Strcams with intennittent flow draining: 10 to<50 acres 15 ft 50 to 100 acres �25% 25 ft • Existin�or created wetlands<0.5 acrc� 25 tt • Existing ur created wetlands 0.5 acres or greater • Streams and springs with perennial flow <25°ro 50 ft • Streams�vith intern�ittent flow draining>100 acres • Natural lakes, onds,and in-stream im oundments • Tualatin Ri��er QS% 125 ft • Springs with intcnnittcnt Flow >25% I S ft • Existing or creatcd wetlands >25% Variable troin 50 to 200 ft,measured • "Tualatin Ri�cr in 25-ft increments from starting point • Strcams with perennial flow to break in slope plus 35 tt past break • Streams with intern�ittent flow draining>100 acres in slope. • Springs with percnnial flow • Natural lakes, unds,and in-stream im oundments Source:l)c�si�n nird C'onsmucrior�S1nnd�rrds for Snnitrn_r Sen er and Sur/ace Wnler Mancrgemeni(CWS 2004) The vegetated corridor consists of three plant communities. PBS biologists gathered cover and composition data at sample plots approximately 100 feet apart on both sides of the streams. Vegetation was sampled for all species with cover greater than five percent using a 30-foot radius plot for woody vegetation and a 10-foot radius plot for herbaceous vegetation. The condition of each plant community was rated as good, marginal, or de�naded based on cover by native species and tree canopy cover(Table 2). Table 2. Vegetated Corridor Condition Standards. Corridor Condition Criteria Gi�� Combination of native tree,shrub,and herbaceous species covering greater than 80%of the area and greater than 50%tree canopy(areal measure) Marginal Combination of na�tive tree,shrub,and herbaceous species covering 50-80%of the area and 26-50/o tree canopy(areal measure) Debraded Co�nbination of native tree0 shrub,and herbaceous species covering less than 50% of the area and less that 25/o tree canopy(areal measure) Source:Design and Conslruclion Slandnr�ds,for Snnitnr}•Setirer nnd Surjuce Waler Munugement(CWS 2004) 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Water Quality Sensitive Area One contiguous water quality sensitive area occurs on the subject property. The Ball Creek channel runs south parallel to the I-5 onramp along the property boundary with the ODOT right-of-way. Carter Creek intersects Ball Creek near the southeast corner of the property just west of where Carter Creek emerges from a culvert under I-5. Ball Creek flows west through an incised channel straddling the property boundary between Gerber and the property to the south. It enters a culvert near the southwest corner of the property and flo�vs offsite. Within Report Date:July,2006 P B S 4 Project:#70477.002 Natural Resources Assessment Repo Gerber Legendary Bladcs Tax Lot 2S1 12AA00300 Tixard,Ore� the creeks' floodplains there is a 5,194 square-foot wetland of the Riverine Flow-through (RFT) hydrogeomorphic (HGM) subclass. Most of the wetland is on the Gerber property but extends onto the ODOT right-of-way and the property to the south (Figure 3). The wetland and contiguous portions of Ball Creek and Carter Creek is the only water quality sensitive area that occurs within the assessment area. The on-site wetland edge was delineated using methods in the Corps of Erigiraee�s Wetla��ds Delineatio�a Mantral(Environmental Laboratory 1987). The delineation report is included as Appendix A. The calculated corridor ��idth for wetlands less than 0.5 acres is 25 feet, but because the wetland is mostly bet��een the two creeks, the streamside corridors exceeds that distance (Table 1). Along Ball Creek and Carter Creek upstream of the concrete weir, the slope is less than 25°/o and thus the calculated corridor width is 50 feet. A slope greater than 25% was found along Ball Creek from the concrete weir to the culvert where the stream leaves the site. In accordance with tl�e guidelines in section 3.02.4 of the Design and Construction Standards (Table 1), the calculated width of the vegetated corridor containing the slope is 60 feet (25 feet to the base of the slope plus 35 feet past the break in the slope) (Table 1). However, the actual vegetated corridor is much narrower than the calculated width because of existing development surrounding these streams (Figures 2 and 3). _ 3.2 Vegetated Corridor The vegetated corridor was evaluated for the parts of Ball Creek and Carter Creek that occupy portions of the subject property (Figure 2). Vegetated corridor width was determined following assessment of the land slope bordering the wetland and stream corridors. Because the actual vegetated corridor is narrower than the calctilated corridor width, sample plots were located only within the area that is actually vegetated. Three plant communities make up the vegetated corridor within the assessment area. Vegetation data is represented in Table 3. 3.2.1 On-site Vegetated Corridor Plant community 1 includes plots E 1-E4 and runs along the east side of Ball Creek between the northern property line and the wetland near the confluence of Ball and Carter creeks. This plant community has the highest cover values for natives (34%) and trees (48%) on the site, While the tree cover technically meets the criteria for the "marginal" condition, best professional judgment demands a "Degraded" condition rating because English hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna), a weedy non-native species, accounts for almost half of the tree cover. Secondly, the fortn of this "tree" is often more shrub-like than tree-like not providing an effective or desirable canopy with regards to water quality. The area is a dense mix of red alder (Alnus rubra), English hawthorn, Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), and Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius). Pacific willow (Salix lucida ssp. lasiandra), Scouler's willow (Salix scoz�le�•iana), and red-twig dogwood (Cornus sericea) are present with low cover values. Report Date:July,2006 Projec:t:#t70477.002 PBS s N.itur,il Resi�urces,�sscssment Rcpo� Gerher Legendary Blades Tax Lot 2S112AA00300 Ti�ard,Orcgc�n Tablc 3. Vegetated Corridor Plot Data and Condition Ratings for the Gerber Legendarv Blades Assessment Arca—Tax Lot 2S112AA00300. Native/ Percent Cover Species Invasi��e* r 1 E2 L:3 r4 S 1 S2 S3 S4 SS S(, S7 N t N2 N3 N-� N� N(i N7 N8 rees :�lirin� rrrl�ru \ � ?� �� I I (� ;� �) ? ll) Culucc�cb�tc��dc�ctrrrc�n.�� N j Crataegtrs mono�i•n�r 40 10 40 5 5 Ctrpresstrs.r lc>i•lcu�dii 12 12 Mcrlt�.s domestica 28 l2 Psc�trdotsuga menziesii N 5 Quc rcus garn•ai�a N 5 Rhcu�r�ttrs pwshiana N 7 S�rlrx lucrc/n ssp. lu.cirmdrtr N 20 .S'ali.r srnr�lrrrri�icr N 7 Shrubs ('or�i��.��.�r��rciu N I 5 Cor�•lir.� corrttNa var. callJ. N 5 Ct7isus scoparitrs 1 7 25 �n7iperus sytrmnuln I S Rn��a iltrlltrrna N I 5 — Knhtn�rli.s��olnr I 2i RO 70 7O 4 1� i0 Z7 I R 20 50 8 C�0 I I 5 erbaceous ` �;,�,'� ' 91opc�ctu•t�s�n•utc°nsi.�� 10 5 9rrhenathei7im c>latiir.�� 70 l5 uucus ccm•otu 7 Eqirisetiun a�-vense N ]0 7 I S 13 5 23 (7 6 Gerunitnn dissecltun 6 Hc�dera helix I 99 Hnlcus lanatus 14 20 50 35 35 27 5 }/�ochuris radicata 10 5 Leucanthemiun vulgare 5 Lotirs conaict�lalt�s l 1 7 P/�alaris•ur�indinacc:u I 7 6 6 17 35 5 5 7 7 5 12 5 l'lunlugo lnnceolata 7 Pucr pru�cnsis 6 Poa trivialis 5 ]0 5 nnunculus repens 6 Seneciojacoboeu 5 Tri/�olitun dtrbium 9 6 5 Unidentified la�vn s�rasses 2S 40 48 70 1'trlpiu M-ontoicles 5 Plant Community 1 2 3 Percent of tree co�•er 48 13 3 Percent co��er of nati�°es 34 15 3 Corridor Condition De raded De raded De raded *A blank indicates a non-nati��e spccie� that is not con�iclered in��isice. Report Date:July,2006 Project:#70477.002 PBS � Natural Resources Assessmeni Repor Gerber Legendary Blades Tax Lot ZSl 12AA00300 Tigard,Ore�on Plant Community 2 includes plots S 1-S7 and N 1-N4. This area is a mix of invasive plants ��-ith landscape plants occasionally present along top of the slope adjacent to the parking lots on either side. Ball Creek is lined with dense thickets of Himalayan blackberry on the steep banks. Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arurzdinaeea) is �ften present immediately adjacent to the stream. Open areas are typically dominated by non-native grasses, including velvet ��-ass (Holcirs lunatus) and meadow foxtail (Alopecan-us p�-ate�zsis), or common horsetail (F_qirisetzrm arvense). Adjacent to the culvert to the west is a broad area covered with English ivy (Hedera I�eli.x). Areas of landscape plants are scattered along the top of the slope. These include Leyland cypress (Cupressus .a let�lar�dii) on the south side and blue star juniper (Jzmiper-us squamata) and domestic apples (Mr�li��s domestica) on the north side. Plant Community 3 includes plots NS-N8. This area consists of streamside patches of Himalayan blackherry and reed canarygrass, and mowed grass and weeds in a narrow band between the stream and the parking lot. Much of the grass was clipped too short to identify, but includes rough-stemmed blue��rass (Poa trivialis) and six-weeks fescue (Virlpia bromoides). Weedy forbs in this area include birds-foot trefoil (Lotus corrriculatus), creeping buttercup (Ra�iuncirlus �°eperis), and least hop clover (Ti-ifolit��n darbiz�m). 3.2.2 Off-site Vegetated Corridor North of the property, Ball Creek contains a similar mix of native and invasive species as described in Plant Community 1 in a narrow band between the freeway onramp and a parking lot. Ball Creek flows into a culvert at the western edge of the property and thus lacks a vegetated corridor(Figure 2). 4.0 SUMMARY This Natural Resources Assessment Report was prepared for Tax Lot 2S 112AA00300, located in Tigard, Oregon, at the request of the property owner, Gerber Legendary Blades. Gerber is proposing stream bank stabilization and removal of a small concrete weir on Ball Creek. The property consists of a manufacturing facility with parking lots on the east and west sides. Vegetation lines the stream corridors along the eastern and southern property boundaries. The site was assessed for water quality sensitive areas and vegetated corridor conditions according to section 3.02 and Appendix C of Design and Constr-itction Standards (CWS 2004). One water quality sensitive area occurs on the subject property. Ball Creek flows south along the eastern property boundary where it is joined by Cartcr Crcek near the southeast corner of the property. A 5,194 square-foot wetland occurs around this confluence and extends onto the property to the south and onto the ODOT right-of-way to the east. The western portion of the on-site vegetated corridor below the concrete weir contains slopes greater than 25% due to the channelizing of the creek. The calculated width of the vegetated corridor below the weir is 60 feet. In all other areas, the calculated width of the vegetated corridor is 50-feet. Three plant communities were identified on the site and all are dominated by invasive and/or non-native species. The condition of these plant communities was rated as "Degraded". Report Date:July,2006 P B S 7 ProjecL #70477.002 Natural Resources Assessment Repor Gerber Legendary Blades Tax Lot 2S1 12AA00300 Ti�ard,Oregon This natural resource assessment report documents the investigation, best professional jud��nent, and conclusions of PBS Engineering and Environmental. It is correct and complete to the best of our knowledge. Respectfully submitted, i f � .___ -;r•'-:.. � ,�l:.r ....i.. Jason Clark, MS Botanist %; _ �J� �� °� ;%/ Doug Swanson, MS, PWS Senior Scientist Report Date:July,2006 P B S x Project:#70477.002 i Natural Resources Assessment Repor Gerber Legendary Blades Tax Lot 2S1 12AA00300 TiQard,OreQOn 5.0 REFERENCES Adamus, P. R., and D. Field. 2001. Guidebook for hydrogcomorphic (HGM)-based assessment of Oregon wetland and riparian sites. I. Willamette Valley ecoregion, riverine impounding and slope/flat subclasses. Volume IA: Assessment methods. Oregon Division of State Lands, Salem, Oregon. City of Tigard, Oregon. Local Wetland Inventory Map. http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/online_services/gis/docs/wrod.pdf CWS. 2004. Chapter 3: Standard design requirements for storm and surface water and vegetated corridors, and Appendix C: Natural resource assessments. In Design and construction standards for sanitary sewer and surface water management. Clean Water Services, Hillsboro, Oregon. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. US Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experimcnt Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Grcen, G. L. 19�32. Soil survey of Washin�ton (��unty, Oregon. 11S De��artmc►�t ��t�Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station. Guard, B. J. 1995. Wetland plants of Oregon and Washington. Lone Pine Publishing, Vancouver, British Columbia. Hitchcock, A. S. 1971. Manual of grasses of the United States. Dover Publications, New York. Hitchcock, C. L., and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. Pojar, J., and A. MacKinnon, editors. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast: Washington, Oregon, British Columbia, and Alaska. Lone Pine Publishing, Vancouver, British Columbia. US Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetland Inventory Map. http://www.fws.gov/nwi/ USGS. 1956 (Photo revised 1992). Lake Oswego, Oregon, 7.5-minute series quadrangle. US Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado. Report Date:July,2006 Projec;t:#70477.002 PBS y FIGURES ;�! r.y� � -� � .;c M � u � �. `'�_�. �,`f'�.<�,. � 1�; - _ Ol'� �. �A, ,� � . / � �� `JT�� • :' �., .�'�r✓� c� • ;i�•+� � =:i;{,��.�.�1� �CL � � � 1 �• .'• .. ♦� �y',�, } W�t �' `':� ',��a � � �"� ^.a.;'-)F !' �' • � � ! •i ,",:-, -�., : - � ,; r . .��, .... �,r-. ;";��: ,.' ';'' . r;:-;,,`. '/I�.� �'�'� •• y� ��J'/''• -��_. ,N�a.��!� � y"f��:w';�� Q w�l�f�� 11 _I��` ' �� '7 �S'. � :� • •.i��: � � .i . � � .�� ., � �.i . ..�• , ,.. �- ��<.. •.� . ,�1�' �� , _�. , _ ',_ jt=�=�►;= -- 6 �+ , . .. r , �� •r r.\ .• �. ( t • ' • 1, - � 1 . •t• �� ._ � !. '�.-. � • �� •�• � � w• • . i � •�� ,• � � � 'y_.. � � _'� :;o• '� 1 '` . Ir � :� �: 6�•. .',: . � •� � " l� � � �, .u.•-�r.: � ��,` T .Nr, - I • _"�';''' '' 1� ?_:='i j�'� t'r-'�2'• °-•�',�• ♦ •' its f�, •� � % 1. 't .. _ �, ►,� •. _ • . � . .� .� �■ air ' A��i, -_ • �-� � ,�j0 a' � . 4•�: , , � a � � �...'t �1�` • . �' �',I r ' . �� . Aa'' '' N �' I � ��Z i �*/' •.. C]� � � '�_ '� � r . . • .R x ,.. y i�� ; . .�, j .s `•� ;+ o • /� i�l f �' ' • �� ' '" . . ,.,�.- 39 � , / � . . • �,,,.� •, >� ' � � ► ' l ' �" ' ' � • ... f . � •' � � t + _ * � � =- ..� '° � �+ .� � .• -� � �.�� T . . _ '� � '.f`p F� � %� �.d ' �.��►, �Ilq � .' ' Y . . '�" R�I � . ��.'�� .�� \ � . / � :o • ►�. • � �4 �� 1�+ i� �E�Y �'' ; • ,`�� ► 9` i � , . �� a r. t .�� .,,t . �.,_ �� • _'� ' 'c+ . — o � #, ,� r. ' •., � '• . �,� . ProjectArea � -- - =.�/,J _.` , �' ' l\ _ do \ _� M �I�. 's' _ r . 1 .� �r�� _ �1. � '��'r •�' . �� . � ...r....�� l�� .r� •. • .. _ _. - ...� `\ �, . �; � , :f ' _ 1�� , . , N i� � �t ' 6'' _�� '_ a ii�� Y. � � , • '�{.� ! j•s i� w. �� I . � _. •� �. `' �r :i.- :QORI • . , � _ � ' _-. - �O- • •� � . , � " ,.;r -, ��r' ) r•!��r .�� •'. � ` /9J r �, �,.� � �1� f • '1�/.- A •.�� A Mh e� w�� • • • J; _ i.� r _��_i._ i-_�`��.�.��-�'�. �xi►: ;��. ,?,�.yl:- ��.., . , . :•. - - 'R I� ' .,.� ,. ., . .� , .,� , ., ,�• .,, .. �.` T„_ -r � , . �:• K � 1 �� .' .� �, . � �f° :i� ., .. �" ., + ' :.:. .'. . � r�0'' ,��. . ~ � ' ' :;'� �'� --- - - -��•' _ . ��, , . �f � t �. '' ��1, � b � � . •�; G -- �� `�: / �� ' , t :� �--��.. __ _f �� . �. ..�_ :��• ••� j.. •�� • •�� '�+ { I 1. . • r._ .•� ��(EIF. 4 ' ' � - ,' `4'� �, � • _ � � � � J M�., ,. •;• _ .� � � ', � � � � � � �2 , - J . - � f� Q � � l. � -�1 .�� . � _ N - •/ I �r� Y� � ?4Q ; � � �! ..-� �. t '� �,. Tr�,fr P � � ;, � ; =1�� : �I ti3 �-i �,a . " ��`?` ', -- o� Y ' � p�.....� Ix. 1�, y . .,,� J . I � r . t'� !' � �� i� � � � '�` f � � ' + ��,. � •�....-� _ �/"__ • ``-i� i�� ► �� ( F . . ' ° � ;� .�' �, � ; '� ti r♦ i� Si -y �� "� . .• . . il. .� _ `'. - q . - , f."`�l � � � . .. . ..`,/ . . , .;y�), S!9 , ,;'�.�. �'• L■r� j;f..: � .� � � ;�'::' (d ' �,- ^ F � �' � . �� . yQy� >�"��, 1�93 •��; , .l�1��• � '`,; � �`�fi.�C¢' � 1 -_ �1 �;��' �:1� 3� C k, 1 � ^ " , f• - • ' r� � [��,�j . (.� , `� �� i\ ` � ,`\�' .�', '� • i. / ��1 .A fu`6 G'7 t �,�-- -L�� i 1 +�__t�__. �iy�k • ...��ti� • / .. ,�`�`� � . ��. , �� vw_i !-�. ,�i .f ' 1 , ��, . F: �! •� Q�• ti .�"'� �-: , ,_ .. � ; � � r . - -�- . ,' • �� -.,: � ::+; . ;; ' ; • " ;• • !•• � , ,s f .:�:; � ,� � . . . • • C�'� ..%' � J � • f • ■ p' • � � �? ..�1 li�':•,� � 'g�4,3:,r��, re %• `:, � •.�- '- --� ' •' • - •- Source�USGS Lake Oswego Quadrangle OR,1981.Revised 1984. o�ii.�a •s.i.m •Euq�n• N A P'°�°"'� SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE �oa��.00z Gerber Legendary Blades � P B S oate 14200 SW 72nd Avenue �uy 2006 TIGARD, OREGON � "t. ■ }, �lf� _pu_._ . �-�'� r .�� •',, da#.:'.- �Z oao� � � • .. �. .�, q �. �� _ p N + � � � � n �Y , * a. '� � � � # � � .. o � � � ° �..,a.R� . . . rt r � r. � ' �` � � f �J �,;� ` . �,. . ��- _.° q`� r +� �.. � ,��r .-: � . ��.„pa r.��;.�,� � • � „: . p �7 j.�h1 � , h *: _ . . . - 4� � . ..� ....'M".. ' } � �-... �' +�N �� .;� � ��w � Z � �4 � �� '� � � � �. b�I _�� .. � � ,� J� � �'��1j ! � ��' >��' � � �.�..' a `fJ '$' 0 � '° �°. ` .�t �l,'. � � � > �� ` •� '• � . . „ Irr'sh3� �'�..� . �^ ,*+�1�' �, i �f �R .. �y�i ��.;]�+ �1 �- '�a ¢ 'l�i �=� a�, �Y� + �� F � I b'� 1 '«��4'yk.� �m �, I � 1 �. �w �e '� �' � � .• � .; =o � . '. ��.�'�°:9..i11�+M�r�`�� `..�.�.� -r�r- _ - �I 7 �� .. �' 2 o � � �4 i � .��' '� _ '-� ' :� � ► �f:. �,� �i � �, � y .,*�.. ..� '• �` �� i g� � . '�.t�� ' p _^ ' � �—�°'� � ,, ` ::�, i+ s�u' ,f �J. �y, : � - t m� � t,�,�;� � '"1g � ��°� ,. . . ;�� m 1D � ;�: �:;; , �� € . , �'{ + 3 � �. y � � � ' a q .F. � �i �n,-.� . . � ..., � 'r r� N T` . . . . � � . . � - 1 � �_ ��:�ja: �fn�� 7 ��. . , �� • . . - . . � �., . . . �;.', ':{.. . '°+ . fD � y'� � .-5.��F. ;, �. ; .'.�' . � �� . . ., R F � �t; �`i � � ' . • `�� ' , � tDx � Z �n � i:'�is�� j - w � , - � . . . .. . �t � � �:�i.[§,�: � ' . � � 'n� � Ty � ¢ a� � . cNi�� °j'�� "�`.� � m ; �3 '-.r.x.:!:i"� � .• ° � o ,�.; ��, i .� :� '� `M ` �- � s°�- s�; � , .y , cp � t� ti: ry1�n. � (fi . p_ �° � � ... ,f � � �'�,;pt . A -� . k ,� r� � �. � � . - �� ro '�� {¢'t a9'.. .. ,-. F... '� '�- � � ��r g Oi .. '� . Z . .. � ��},�� ,.If � � •�. � �' <'_• �,,,�,,,�►�;� ,, �Y � � ��; �: � �. G �, � �" � �:� � -`�- ---- -�",:�k � �' 1'�', � �� r+ � ,. _ � g . �.� v�( ! `r _ _ �,�' � n �V W � � l� Y} y Lt � � , i ..�.. . ' °y � ��}�,r_; � A - � ' , . , � � .S.. , �.� ��v ., f • � ��T�� , �� ° � � � � ..� �j�.`��rr� ' ,� � . � :�.��-. ; ti 'r F `, � .'�+i � �+ �` i J� u =� •N � .? � .�,�'� � L�. .� �. � ..� . . . 't � Aj J., I�� v�� . . Z'� � 'i�f �� . �' � I �. 01 � �! .t, ,� �� .. - . �� =�� } .�v�' +► '' ; � �RI� �.Y, __'�� •�O� r00 � — ., titi� s�.� .� �.. . , __— Z �' ..�� , , ., h + . +�` cD �'� 1��' �Yw � a1� � '+.. 'Ar� � �,v v"�c.� �,,�� 4f `. 4.•��r' � �) ,-• . . � ..1 � ,. � cn � m 'm , V' 4Y.N i.+a+. .1[ -- '� �Y O ��+..W'—_ O � . fTl � T f� _ � 1 _ ;;. _ __ _ _ � P'��`*: WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREA AND VEGETATED CC7�tRIDOR MAP Fi�uRE � 7aa��.002 Gerber Legendary Blades � o�ts= 1420Q SW 72nd Avenus �f} �uiy2oos TIGARD, OREGON N895070"E -- ------, 65I.31" ._._�•-• � STAGING AREA� � � `" i � } i j � �o � ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL I C' � �� 1310 MAIN STREET 1 I � I VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON 98660 AREA 1 � ! � PHONE:(360)690-4331 � ! � FAX:(360)8969084 ' LEGEND ^' I i / i http�/lwww.pbsenv.com e a BENCHMARK . . � �� I ( I � � = WETLAND � �� -.. I \ � = ACTIVITY/IMPACT AREAS � � ` � I A��A' = CROSS SECTION LOCATION � � � ' • I ,' �' I -•-•-•-•-•- � ORDINARY HIGH WATERLINE ' � 1 j � � I = EXISTING CONTOURS ` � � � ��,, � � h `°"`�`•` `�•• \ AREA 2 I V� I � ' � �'r B' � W \ � 'm`l I \ � , g k (/ i ' I cn � ') � i w� � W gt '� � � � � � W I � i '�I j ,� � � � 1 : g � � � � ` � , � ,,._ g! � � � ° \� � : �r ; ; � � � � i , � Q Q ' ��_� � � O � � zz . , _� i � � � � 9 � r�+._� I ; c% W � � ° �I \ � •' , � � o C� �..o,. �..�. � \ �. � � E~-+ a � \\ � � I W � 4 � �� r*�� /—��i � � `—' �\ ��/'�� l j W i STUDY AREA \ \ �� '�� I � ' r � � I�� ) � �// ~�' . 4 �. � ��• ��,�- -------------�\ .; �.•. � -�--- --�' ��._ =�-- --- ------------- -,� ----- ._._._...,. �;. I l � ------ r ----- 'n�.r°'� ..l �� ^_____ _ � I.•_._:y...�':{,.• ••�•• � i � �� . �' �} �w� �.�.� -�-�-�-�-�-�-�-�-.-.-.-._._._ :�.�._.-._._ . . ._.�.�y. •. i � ,._, - ` -{...�_�.•-•f""' � _ - �. ..,...-'. .c�� .:�.,. � v � I � J ` �� —._._._._._._._._._._._._._.�._._._._._._._._._.�'_•—•_'—._'_'—• •---!"�•� _��_--——'�'——.9ALL CREEK ____._._._..�.�....!�,,,,1,_{=:'".�,�r. � C •—._._. _C'. •v; Y . -' '..�•—•—.— +� �• ��' '� � ° • x� '_'�'_ -��„��.-._'-'y�- 'S� 792G'W 66 2�� " �•� •�.�'4,1.J�.� � w '.' . � t ��. .r ��.."_ '� � i �----�� _ i �. : . y •1, �. I I � ,`��.�S.•...� .:� �,�� _" '--_-' .�_� �.. V��. � i I` � _____�-' EXISTING CONCRETE WEIR • �:� "__.-� J �� y. " I � I WETLAND AREA=5194 SF � � 4 � i �- ._---- �_/ i � � : L------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- �� J � � NOTES: ° „ 1. SURVEY PROVIDED BY STATEWIDE LAND SURVEYING,INC. � Project#: F'I�iURt, N 2. WETLAND BOUNDARY SURVEYED BY STATEWIDE LAND SURVEYING,INC.SUPPLEMENTAL POINT LOCATION 70477.002 ° o• zs� sa �ar COLLECTED BY PBS USING TRIMBLE GEOXT GPS UNIT WITH SUBMETER POST PROCESSING ACCURACY. ^ 0 Dace: � SCALE: 1�=50� 3. SEE FIGURE 4 FOR CROSS SECTIONS AND PROPOSED CONTOURS. JULY 200G APPENDIX A Wetland Delineation Report ��°��IVED �� ;:_ :' 8 2006 - �;ITY OF TiGARD pg S a�_aNNiNG/ENGINEER(NG V�etland Delineation Report Gerber Legendary Blades 14200 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon Prepared for: Fiskars Brands Inc. Gerber Legendary Blades Division Tigard, Oregon 1310 Main Street July 2006 Vancouver,WA98660 Project#70477.002 360.690.4331�.vur+ 360.696.9064 F,ax I $$$.873.7275 TOLL FREE LENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL � www.pbsenv.com 1 � � � WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT Gerber Legendary Blades 14200 SW 72°`� Avenue Tigard, Oregon Prepared for Fiskars Brands Inc. Gerber Legendary Blades Division � Ti�ard, Oregon This report is for the exclusive use of the client and is not to be relied upon by other parties. It is not to be photographed, photocopied, or similarly reproduced in total or in part without the expressed written consent of the client and PBS. Prepared by PBS Engineering and Environmental 1310 Main Street Vancouver, WA 98660 � (360) 696-9064 � PBS Project No: 70477.002 July 2006 Wetland Delineation Report Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................2 1.1 Project Location.........................................................................................................................2 1.2 Site Description...................................................�--....................................................................2 1.3 Site Hydrology...........................................................................................................................3 1.4 Mapped Soi1s .............................................................................................................................4 1.5 Plant Communities.....................................................................................................................4 2.0 METHODS...................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Soils............................................................................................................................................6 2.2 Hydrology..................................................................................................................................6 2.3 Vegetation..................................................................................................................................6 3.0 RESULTS .....................................................................................................................................7 3.1 Ball Creek and Carter Creek......................................................................................................7 3.2 National and Local Wetland Inventory 1�1aps............................................................................7 3.3 Growing Season.........................................................................................................................7 3.4 Delineated Wetland....................................................................................................................8 3.5 Hydrogeomorphic Classification and Assessment of Function Capacity..................................9 4.0 CONCLUSIONS..........................................................................................................................9 4.1 Summary....................................................................................................................................9 4.2 Regulatory Context....................................................................................................................9 4.3 Wetland and Water Quality Sensitive Area Vegetated Corridors .............................................9 5.0 REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................11 SUPPORTING DATA LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Site Map Figure 3 Aerial Photograph Figure 4 Soil Survey Map Figure 5 National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 6 Local Wetland Inventory Map Figure 7 Wetland Delineation Map APPENDICES Appendix A— Site Photographs Appendix B — Data Sheets Appendix C— Plant List and Wetland Indicator Status Appendix D —Assessment of Wetland Function Capacity: Judgmental Method Report Date:July 2006 PBS P��;e�t:#�oa��.002 Wetland Delineation Report Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon 1.0 INTRODUCTION Gerber Legendary Blades is proposing to stabilize two sections of eroding streambank along Ball Creek and remove a concrete weir on Carter Creek adjacent to their factory in Tigard, Oregon. PBS Engineering and Environmental was contracted to delineate the ordinary high water mark (OHM) of Ball Creek and Carter Creek and the adjacent wetland on the property. Jason Cl�rk and Jolanta Glabek of PBS conducted fieldwork on May 25 and July 17, 2006. Doug Swanson, PWS, reviewed the field delineation on June 1, 2006 anci July 20, 2006. This report documents the investigation, best professional jud�nnent, and conclusions of PBS Environmental. It is correct and complete to the best of our knowledge. It should be considered a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination of wetlands and other waters and used at your own risk until it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the Oregon Department of State Lands in accordance with OAR 141-090-0005 through 141-090-0055. 1.1 Project Location The property is in Tigard, Oregon, southwest of the junction of Interstate 5 and Highway 217 and north of the junction of SW 72"� Avenue and SW Bonita Road (Figures 1 and 2). The 5- acre site (Tax Lot No. 2S 1 12AA00300) is in the NE '/4 of the NE '/4 of Section 12, Township 2N, Range 1 W, WM, Washington County, Oregon. The approximate center of the property is at latitude 45.41749° N and longitude 122.74584° W. The site is within the Carter Creek subwatershed of the Fanno Creek subwatershed of the Tualatin River. 1.2 Site Description The property consists of a blade manufacturing facility with parking lots on the east and west sides and a driveway connecting them along the south side of the building. Vegetation lines the stream corridors along the eastern and southern property boundaries. The property is zoned industrial and is surrounded by other industrial facilities on the north, west, and south. The High�vay 217 onramp to Interstate S southbound is immediately east of the property (Figure 3). A wetland is located in the southeast corner of the site where Ball and Carter Creeks converge and extends off of the site onto the property to the south and into the ODOT right- of-way at the southeast corner of the site. Approximately half of the wetland extends off-site. The riparian area of Ball Creek was i�npacted, to some extent, by the ODOT Interchange Improvement Pacific Highway at Highway 217/Kruse Way project. To compensate for impacts to the functions and values of the Ball Creek/Carter Creek system, both on-site and in-kind mitigation occurred in the form of enhancement of the riparian area. The work was completed in the late 1990s/eary 2000s. Report Date:July 2006 P B S ProjecC#70477.002 � Wetland Delineation Report Gcrber Le�endary Blades Tigard,Orcgon 1.3 Site Hydrology The Ball Creek channel runs south parallel to the I-5 onramp along the property boundary with the ODOT right of way, intersects Carter Creek near the southeast corner of the property just west of where Carter Creek emerges from a culvert under I-5 and continues to flow west through an incised channel straddling the property boundary between the Gerber property and the property to the south. It enters a culvert near the southwest corner of the property and flows offsite. Both Ball Creek and Carter Creek were channelized, rerouted, and culverted to accommodate construction of Interstate 5 and other adjacent developments. Washington County has a predominantly temperate marine climate ty}�ical of much of the west coast. Summers are wann and relatively dry, and winters tend to be mild, but rather wet. The coastal mountains protect the county from the intense winter storms common on the coast. Mean high temperatures for Portland, Oregon, range from 45°F in January to 79.8°F in August. Mean low temperatures range from 33.9°F in January to 56.8°F in August. Precipitation was within the norrnal ranbe for April and slightly higher than norrnal for May 2006. In June precipitation was slightly lower than the normal range, but within the normal range for July 1-17, however, that might change as the month progresses. Precipitation levels are considered normal when they fall between tigures for which there is a 30% chance of more than that amount and a 30% chance of less than that amount (Table 1). Rainfall far the area fluctuated from month to month. In April, the area received 0.44 inches less rainfall than average, while in May the area received 0.62 inches more than average. In June rainfall was 0.70 inches less than average, while July 1-17 rainfall was already higher than average. Daily precipitation totals for the two weeks prior the two days of fieldwork on May 25 and July 17, 2006 are listed in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively. Table I: Monthly precipitation totals for Portland and"normal"ranges for Beaverton,OR. Precipitation(inches) Month 2005/2006 1973-2000 30%chance will have less than more than May-OS 4.34 �•48 2.82 Jun-OS 221 I.03 1.97 Jul-OS 0.41 �•28 0.86 Aug-OS 1.05 0.23 1.00 Sep-OS 1.70 0.68 1.94 Oct-OS 3.39 ��4 3.67 Nov-OS 4.98 4.06 7.00 Dec-OS 7.52 4.34 7.35 Jan-06 ]0.92 3.49 6.93 Feb-06 2.23 3•12 5.8 8 Mar-06 3.57 3.00 4.62 Apr-O6 2.26 �•gg 3.27 May-06 3.00 1.48 2.82 Jun-06 0.93 1.03 1.97 Julyl-July 17 0.74 0.28 0.86 Report Date:July 2006 P B 5 � Projcct:#70477.002 WeNand Delineation Report Gcrber Lcgcnd�ry Blades Tigard,Oregon �l�ahle 2: Daily precipitation totals tor P��rtland t�vo wceks prior to tiriclwork d�mr��n Mav 2�. 200fi. Date in May 2006 11 12 13 14 15 l6 17 18 19 20 2 l 22 23 24 25 "I'otal Precipitation 0 0 0 O.fi U 0 0 0 0.7 O.OI 0.22 0.25 O.�fi U.�I 0.� �Cablc 3: Daily precipitation totals fbr P<�rtland t�y�o�vcrks prior to ticld��ork dc�nc c�n July l7. 2006. Date in Jul 2006 3 4 5 6 '7 8 9 10 11 i 2 13 (4 15 l b 17 7'otal Precipitation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0.45 'l 0 0 0 0 1.4 Mapped Soils Two soils are mapped on the site (Figure 4). Most of the site is mapped as Urban Land (map unit 41), defined as soils which have been sufficiently modified by urban activity to preclude traditional identification. The soil near the southeast corner of the site is mapped as Quatama loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes (map unit 37B). This is a moderately well drained soil fonned in mixed, loamy alluvium. 1.5 Plant Communities The vegetation is restricted to the vegetated corridors along the streams and the adjacent lawn between the stream and parking lot. Streamside vegetation is dominated by non-native species including bird's-foot trefoil (Lotus cor•niculatus), English hawthorn (C�-ataegr�s monogyna), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius), and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Native species include red alder (Al�izrs �-�rbra), Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriarza), Pacific willow (Salix lucida ssp. lasiar7dra), California hazel (Co�ylus cornuta var. califo�°nica), red-osier dogwood (Cor•nus sericea), and common horsetail (Equisetum arvense). 2.0 METHODS The entirety of Tax Lot No. 2S 112AA00300 was examined for wetlands and other waters. The ordinary high water mark (OHW) for Ball Creek and Carter Creek was determined using the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Regulatory Guidance Letter No. OS-O5, Ordinary High Water Mark Identification (Riley 2005). Principal indicators used for determining the OHW for this site include natural line impressions on the bank, scour lines, and bent, matted, or absent vegetation. The OHW was marked in the field using pink flagging tape or pink pin flags (depending on the vegetation) and a predefined numbering system. Flags were labeled with a letter for the cardinal direction indicating which side of the creek, followed by sequential numbers (i.e. S 1, S2, and so on). Wetlands were delineated using the Routine Determination Method for delineating wetlands described in the US Army CoiPs of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manua! (Environmental Laboratory 1987). The Routine Determination Method examines three criteria, hydrology, vegetation, and soils, to determine if jurisdictional wetlands are present in the study area. Report Date: July 2006 P B S 4 Project#70477.002 Wetland Delineation Report Gerber Legcndary Blades Tigard,Ongon Preliminary preparation prior to the on-site investigation consisted of collecting and reviewing existing data and information that included the following: ■ National wetland inventory map (Lake Oswego, OR) ■ Local wetland inventory map (Tigard, OR) ■ Washington County soil survey and hydric soils list ■ Washington County tax lot information ■ USGS Topo��raphic Map, Lake Oswego 7.5-minute Quadrangle (1975) ■ Aerial photographs Fieldwork was conducted on May 25 and July 17, 2006. Data was recorded for four sample plots on May 25, 2006 and an additional five sample plots on July 17, 2006. Sample plots and soil core samples were established until paired samples (one wetland and one non-wetland) were obtained to accurately determine the location of the wetland boundary. Plot locations were chosen to adequately evaluate the two parts of the wetland: (1) the reed canarygrass (Phalu�-is a��ndinacea) area between Ball Creek and Carter Creek and area south of Carter Creek, and (2) the narrow strip between the parking lot and Ball Creek. On the south end, plots were placed on either side of the transiti�n from reed canarygrass to Himalayan blackberry (Rubtis discolor•), �vhich correlates with a rise in topography. On the north end plots were placed based on anecdotal soil samples, which identified the transition between hydric and non-hydric soils, and hydrology. Other criteria, such as topography and visible hydrologic indicators, were also used to accurately determine the Iocation of the wetland boundary. Photographs were taken to document site conditions at each sample point (Appendix A). The wetland boundary and sample plots were marked in the field using pink flagging tape or pink pin flags and a predefined labeling system. Wetland boundary flags were labeled with the letter"A" plus sequential numbers going in a counter clockwise direction (i.e. A-1, A-2, and so on). Sample plots were labeled with SP (an abbreviation for sample plot) and a sequential number (i.e. SP-1, SP-2 and so on). Statewide Land Surveying did a professional land survey of the boundary and sample point locations. Because grounds keeping crews disturbed some of the flags before the survey, PBS collected supplemental point locations with a Trimble GeoXT, a GPS with sub meter post processing accuracy(Figure 7). Four paired plots, and one additional plot were used to characterize the wetland. The northeastern section of the study area is similar in its characteristics and one paired plot was felt to be sufficient to characterize the area. The wetland boundary,just north of SP-A2, marks the change from wetland to upland vegetation. The second paired data plot is located at the southwest corner of the wetland. This wetland boundary was determined by the change in soil from hydric to non-hydric soil and a decrease of hydrophytic vegetation, especially reed canarygrass (Phalaris ai-��ndinacea) and bird's- foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus). The third paired data plot was taken south of the second paired plot, across Ball creek, marking the western boundary. This boundary is apparent due to the increase in elevation and a significant decline of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) in the upland area. The fourth paired data plot is located on the southeast side of the �vetland. The edge of the wetland was determined by a slight elevation increase and a change in vegetation, primarily with an increase of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) presence in the upland. The wetland boundary on the north was determined by the edge of the parking lot. Report Date:July 2006 P B S 5 Project:#70477A02 Wedand Delincation Report Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Orcgon 2.� SO1jS Soil profile holes were dug to assess the soil characteristics and the presence of subsurface liydrology. Soil colors, texture, and presence of redoximorphic features were recorded, and hydric soils were determined using the indicators described in the 1987 Manual. Mitnsell Soi! C'olof• Charts (Munsell Color 2000) was used to determine the color of the soil matrix and mottles. The sample point locations were selected to best characterize the conditions at the site. Soil pits ranged from 16 to 18-inches in depth, with the exception of one data plot where fill material prevented digging a sample soil pit lower than 7-inches (SP-A9). Plots were selected based on areas representing the general site characteristics. Paired plot locations were also selected where there changes in topography or vegetation. In the area between each sample plot, representative soil pits were dug to look at both soils and hydrology in order to more accurately determine the wetland boundary. 2.2 Hydrology Any visible observations of surface hydrology were noted on the data sheets and the depth to saturated soils and free water were recorded at each sample point. The presence of primary and secondary hydrologic indicators was also recorded. Hydrology was determined by the saturation in the soil pit. The depth to saturation was between 10 and 12-inches. Secondary hydrologic indicators were a FAGNeutral test of vegetation. No other primary or secondary hydrologic indicators were recorded. 2.3 Vegetation Vegetation was characterized for the uplands and wetland areas and recorded at each sample point. The vegetation was examined in three strata: herbaceous ��-ound cover, shrubs, and trees. Visual estimates of percent cover of each species occurring within a sample plot were made for each stratum. Canopy cover for trees was estimated within a 10-meter radius, cover for sapling and shrubs were estimated within a 3-meter radius, and cover for herbs was estimated within a 1-meter radius of each sample point. Due to the adjacent location of the parking lot, percent cover estimates for SP-A 1 and SP-A2 were made by extending the length of the estimated area and minimizing the width. All estimates were made to the edge of pavement on the west and the edge of Ball Creek on the east. Canopy cover for trees was estimated 6-meters north and south of the sample plot, cover for saplings and shrubs were estimated 3-meters north and south of the sample plot, and cover for herbs was estimated 1 meter north and south. Dominant species were determined using the 50/20 rule. Dominant plant species for each stratum are those that cumulatively make up the most abundant 50 percent, plus any additional species with 20 percent or more cover. The wetland indicator status for each dominant plant species was used to determine the presence or absence of a wetland (hydrophytic) plant community based on the National List of Plant Species that Occur iri Wetlands: Northwest Region 9 (Reed 1988, 1993). The indicator status describes how likely a species is to be found in wetlands (Appendix C). Report Date:July 2006 P B S � r�«��e�t:#�oa��.002 Wetland Delincation Report Gerbcr Lcgendary Blades Tigard,Oregon Along the northern edge of Ball Creek the banks were incised and eroding, no vegetation was present along these areas of the bank. In other areas, some grasses were present along the banks, changing at the top of bank to upland, often mowed, �,�rasses. Changes in topography were typically associated with a change in vegetative cover from hydrophytic to non- hydrophytic species. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Ball Creek and Carter Creek Ball Creek and Carter Creek are perennial streams connected to navigable waters. Carter Creek flows into Ba11 Creek near the southeast corner of the Gerber property. Ball Creek then flows into Fanno Creek. Fanno Creek flows into the Tualatin River, which flows into the Willamette River. Ball and Carter Creeks do not have anadramous fish because of urbanization and downstream culverts. Ball Creek is culverted downstream for approximately one-half mile. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife maps do indicate the presence of native migratory fish (NMF) in these streams, but data is not attached to this coverage. If this status were still valid, it would be expected that presence would be from a remnant population of cutthroat trout (pers. Comm. Simmons 2006). 3.2 National and Local Wetland Inventory Maps The National Wetland Inventory map for Lake Oswego, Oregon shows a palustrine emergent, persistent, saturated/semipermanent/seasonal (PEM 1 Y) wetland on Carter Creek immediately west of Interstate 5 in the southeast corner of the Gerber property (Figure 5). The GIS data available from the USFWS Wetland Mapper, however, does not show wetlands on the property. The Local Wetland Inventory (LWI) map for the City of Tigard does not show wetlands on the property, either. The LWI map does show wetlands along Ball Creek downstream and southwest of the property(Figure 6). The City of Tigard Local Wetland Inventory Map is based on information dated 1994. A delineation completed in 1997 as part of the Pacific Highway at Highway 217/Kruse Way Interchange project identified a wetland at the site. Additionally, a previous delineation completed at the site in 1992 described a wetland located in an area of low ground bordering the confluence of Ball and Carter Creeks. The NWI map (1981) indicates a wetland on the property. It is unclear why the LWI does not indicate a wetland as existing on the property. 3.3 Growing Season The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) defines the growing season as that portion of the year when soil temperatures at 20-inches below the soil surface are higher than biological zero (41°F or 5°C). When soil temperature data are not available, current national guidance for delineation of wetlands is to use the closest and best available weather station data to estimate the length of the growing season. Current national guidance calls for use of the period with a 50% probability of a temperature of 28°F or higher (Environmental Laboratory 1987). Report Date:July 2006 P B S 7 Project:#70477.002 Wedand Delineation Report Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon According to the Washington County Soil Survey, the growing season for Washington County averages 233 days and extends fi-om March 23 to November 1 1 (50% probability of temperature of 28° F or higher) (Green 1982). 3.4 Delineated VVetland A riverine wetland totaling 5,194 square feet was delineated in the southeast corner of the property. This wetland extends onto the ODOT right of way and the property to the south. The wetland met the criteria for soils, hydrology, and plant communities. Soils The soils in the wetland varied from silty and sandy clays to silty clay loams and loams. However, the soils in this area have been extensively mixed and disturbed by the onsite development and construction of the freeway. The matrix colors ranged from brown (1 OYR 4/3) to very dark brown (l 0YR 3/2) to very dark gray (lOYR 3/1 and 2/1). One sample revealed a mixed matrix of gray (2.SY 6/1) and brown (lOYR S/3). Redoximorphic concentrations (mottles) varied from being faint to prominent, but the low chroma (<1) matrix was indicative hydric conditions. In general, adjacent upland soils were dark brown to very dark brown (lOYR 3/3 to 1 OYR 3/2). However, one data plot showed a mixed matrix of lOYR 3/3 to lOYR 3/2, with light gray, sandy layer of lOYR 7/2. The presence of mottles varied from non-existent to prominent. Appendix B contains the data sheets completed for each sample point. Hydrolo,gy The hydrology in this wetland is affected by overbank flow and lateral ground water seepage from Carter Creek and Ball Creek and by sheet flow runoff from the parking lot. The outlet of the wetland is its western edge where its water seeps into Carter Creek. The wetland floods during high water events. Test pits within the wetland were saturated within the top 10 to 12-inches of the soil profile. Plant Commz�nity The vegetation in the wetland north of Ball Creek is a mix of grasses and weedy herbs (see Appendix C). This area is regularly mowed as close to the creek bank as possible. The area south of Ball Creek and south of Carter Creek west of the confluence is dominated by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) to the exclusion of other species. There is one small patch of red alder (Alnus rubra) and a single Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana) near the mouth of the Carter Creek culverts next to the freeway. A single wapato (Sagitaria latifolia) grows on a muddy flat below the trees. The boundary between the wetland and non-wetland areas was marked by a change in grass species and the presence of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor). The upland areas included species such as soft brome (Bromus hordeaceus). Report Date:July 2006 P-BS � Project:#70477.002 Wetland Delineation Report Gerbcr Lcgcndary Blades Tigard,Oregon 3.5 H,ydrogeomorphic Classification and Assessment of Fimction Capacity The hydrogeomorphic classification of this wetland is Riverine Flow-through (RFT), because it is closely associated with a channel or floodplain and the water continues to flow and is not impounded. The Jud�nnental Method of assessing function capacity was used because the Reference-based Method currently only covers Slope/Flat and Riverine Impounding subclasses. The wetland scored low or zero for all functions including: water storage and delay, sediment stabilization and phosphorus retention, nitrogen removal, thermoregulation, pri�nary production, resident and anadramous fish habitat, invertebrate habitat, amphibian and turtle habitat, breeding waterbird support, wintering and migratory waterbird support, songbird habitat, and support of characteristic vegetation. This is due, in part, to the highly impacted and altered nature of the site, predominance of exotic species, simple vegetative structure (herbaceous only), pollution load in the water, surrounding industrial land use, proximity to busy roads, lack of pools, and absence of surrounding wetlands or ponds. The highest score was for sediment stabilization and phosphorous removal because of the sandy clay soils and the ability of reed canarygrass (P/zalaris arundinacea) to filter out sediments. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 Summary A riverine flow-through wetland totaling 5194 square feet was delineated in the southeast corner of Tax Lot No. 2S 112AA00300 owned by Gerber Legendary Blades. This wetland encompasses the confluence of Ball Creek with Carter Creek and extends onto the ODOT right of way the east and the property to tile south. The wetland boundaries are primarily based on the presence of wetland plant communities, wetland soils, and observed hydrology within the wetlands, and conditions in adjacent areas lacking indicators of one or more of the wetland criteria. 4.2 Regulatory Context Wetlands and streams (including Ball Creek and Carter Creek) are regulated as "Waters of the United States" by the US Army Corps of Engineers under § 404 of the Clean Water Act and by the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) for the purposes of the Removal-Fill Law as "waters of the state" (OAR 141-090-0005 to 0055). Clean Water Services (CWS) regulates activities in "water yuality sensitive areas" (including wetlands) and in the "vegetated corridor"(buffer) adjacent to water quality sensitive areas in Washington County. 4.3 Wedand and Water Quality Sensitive Area Vegetated Corridors The CWS standard vegetated corridor width for jurisdictional wetlands less than 0.5 acres is 25 feet. However, the vegetated corridor width for Ball Creek and Carter Creek is 50 feet in adjacent portions of these streams. Report Date:July 2006 P B S Projecr#70477.002 y Wedand Delineation Report Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon This wetland assessment report documents the investigation, best professional jud�nnent and conclusions of PBS Engineering and Environmental. lt is correct and complete to the best of our knowledge. It should be considered a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination of wetlands and other waters until it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the appropriate jurisdictional authorities. Respectfully submitted, � :�_:.. - % .r:>�r..-� ._- � Jason Clark, MS Botanist ;� '�� /;� Doug Swanson, M. S., PWS Senior Scientist Report Date:July 2006 Project:#70477.002 PBS io Wetland Dclincation Report Gerber Legcndary Blades Tigard,Orcgon 5.0 REFERENCES Adamus, P. R., and D. Field. 2001. Guidebook for hydrogeomorphic (HGM)-based assessment of Oregon wetland and riparian sites. l. Willamette Valley ecoregion, riverine impounding and slope/flats subclasses. Volume IA: Assessment methods. Oregon Division of State Lands, Salem, Oregon. Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D. C. 103 pp. City of Tigard, Oregon. Local Wetland Inventory Map. http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/online_services/gis/docs/wrod.pdf Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. US Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/permit/documents/87manual.pdf Green, G. L. 1982. Soil survey of Washington County, Oregon. US Department of Agriculture, Soi) Conservation Service in cooperation with Oregon A�,n-icultural Experiment Station. 138 pp. plus 49 plates. Guard, B.J. 1995. Wetland Plants of Oregon and Washington. Lonestar Publishing, Redmond, Washington. NOAA. 2006. Preli�ninary Climatological Data, Portland, Oregon. National Weather Service Forecast Office, National Oceanic and At�nospheric Administration, Portland, Oregon. http://www.weather.gov/climate/index.php?wfo=pqr NRCS. 2006. Hydric Soils Definition and Criteria. National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils. http://soils.usda.gov/use/hydric NRCS. 2006. WETS data far Beaverton, Oregon. National Water and Climate Center, Natural Resources Conservation Service. ftp://ftp.wcc.nres.usda.gov/supporticlimate/wetlands/or/41067.txt Oregon Department of State Lands. Administrative Rules for Wetland Delineation Report Requirements and for Jurisdictional Determinations for the Purpose of Regulating Fill and Removal within Waters of the State. (OAR 141-090-0005 to 0055). Pojar, J. and A. MacKinnon. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast: Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska. Lone Pine Publishing, Vancouver, British Columbia. Reed, P. B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Biological Report 88(26.9). US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, Florida. Report Date:July 2006 Project:#70477.002 PB$ ii Wetland Delineation Report Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon Reed, P. B., Jr. 1993. 1993 Supplement to the list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Supplement to Biological Report 88(26.9). US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, Florida. Riley, Don T., Major General, US Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. Regulatory Guidance Letter No. OS-O5; Subject: Ordinary High Water Mark Identification. Seattle Audubon Society. 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington & Northwestern Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, Washington. Schoeneberger, P.J., Wysocki, D.A., Benham, E.C., and Broderson, W.D. (editors). 2002. Field book for describing and sampling soils, Version 2.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, Nebraska. Simmons, Devin L., Habitat Biologist, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2006. Letter to Tom Archer, PBS Engineering and Environmental, Subject: Carter and Ball Creek Fish Presence at Gerber Headc�uarters. June 12, 2006. US Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetland Inventory Map. http://www.fi�s.govinwi/ Report Date:July 2006 Project:#70477.002 PBS iz APPENDIX B Photographs Natural Resources Assessment Report Gerber Legendary Blades Tigazd,Oregon � �`��' ' ',; . �': r: •°�`*^�. ,,_;:, � �� • _ ,.�_'k x�� r.�• �y , Y, ..�, "44R.��.� • ' . , E' r-r. � � t..� Y.'.,y�y •� . A., �, y. ��. . , �y ��, ,'t .'1. � , ' i^'` _' . . � ' 4�� ..�'�V � — --�_—� �t ��1.' .. . .�... �'� � . }� _ ..,., �� . �,q '. _ . . -�., � �� '� � � �,_;. i;�;_ -- . -G �+ _ . � �i K� u� �� ~- �� "��i�� eQ�1.�i '� 1� r �'� - �- / '. .��•*.l�l°�� •�q$� �'{• �• '� . 1iti' ' � :1'��'�1'lti�,� - ' . �'c'.. ,... f ��.•..��* ' :.�.�w��i. �'►.� ';A �,�+. l �4� a ,.'�• Y . � . Tx.t� !)' •' `�'�� ,jM� •. �; :dY " •`.: �. ,jt ,�,. • �;:h�.. � � � .., . . .!;',�, ; ' �.r :f' '' _. � , . r.d: sc,�f M ,t. � . �.'ii'�' +ryt� ' i� `R �..',... �< � w �+ �,W, �y��. ;��"' ,��+,`��; .r��,i+`•'�`- ' �-�,�:a�' ��: �y� ��`,A ,�� . ; � �•a y-r. . � 4Vp ��(y_r. .� .: r . . ;�ji � �. , { �- r �.�y. � .� . i FQat� . 1 ��'.r: . 1:._ '..ws�._�..a:..r.�... ..,. . !'I��t�� I : �;I�: cor�ner of property looking south along Ball Creek. •t I.�r. ". r"�.,.: 'v �'`YQ ,�. �' �_ �c � ,y,. * t� - , ��,*�- � �T �.�' •.t .'4�'` -" .�% �:;;,3�.,� , ,:, ,., ,��. .� ' .-0 ,W. �4' ��. �:a�;i � �r ��; ��+ ��%''v . .��_.,� �, '�"�,' t— ,� "��` ` v�y `� i!. '� �''+:S � 4' '.� �• �y�� '�.�Y'a�� ' � 'j,J� � . �, .:T '�• '.�j �r ��!,ir, w�.ac. ' . ,:� �� /�`�'r\._'��. . ;# � ��, ,� ��;. � � � . � �-d. At�,�f +h. ti �: � � '� � -. `3�r� .k.+ �_rt �._t; � .. � - � �` ,,r �.,.`��y rF� 1'�'i�Y` . .. •,'{:�,��, l` j.` �t;.�� '" �,� .'.I��`. , �`� `.;vAl�,s-.: �'��,.. • -'• • 'ff:r.� ' �`.y °ss �•a�,,l�Z i� .;�'�Jdp,� ` ti ;1 �,� ' ^ �,p�'�A*l `{�� ,��',��'�.�i'M � •,, ��'Oe,�l .. �� '' .. �'� �� '�,I ,� ,��+a '. 4 . :,�► . "' � ., �.. � 9 �7n�� /r} .�<. ♦��r�� s .•; 'a ' �'" .! �-w.ilr.�' _;�'9�:,.,, . , . �il ,.`!6�1'ti.�.t•?��'�''�'�,.�' -` r� .�i � J� .. '��a'�`�. n 'p✓ '`f^+ar, r ` �� 1' ��'• .:.�.� �.:;u . .r �p.. � R, K. �, . . �q��: A� f � r �,K. :¢; � .. : ` , '�� i . � • � 4.V"t +�,� '�r y.i�y�:7 ::1 ; .. C ��, ��j J�� M; �� .� • ,�+ � .� ' •/�. . , , ,�,r ;i � �a.�y t ` .yri r ,�`.t a � >�yF, i,, � .� � . �� .!� "� .7 � 4;� �t ,y ,�, • n� l ��'� �, Iti;�� E �'• �:'�S,�+sa� �r 1�1 .`�� 1'��'1 .�i.�� ' `� KviJ•��i.ak�:'.�{1'S�t',,. +�y.l:°ry�ij, ��K'Y;°>„��f��9' , . ��► Photo 2: Looking east into wetland in southeast corner ot�property at contluence of Ball Creek and Carter Creek. Interstate 5 onramp in background. 1 Report Date:July 2006 PBS Project#:70477.002 Natural Resources Assessm. :eport Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon � � � . . . � � . . �� } �1�".� � w� w�— �.> _ � .. .� � , �t.�r . •..��1111'Tn*�'t+' Ta,; ..a, , '' :r,i.�_��`: i: ��'�z:� _ �"+°��r�''�-�j�r+,��`„� x.�. �� .., � ,� , 1.�V•I'_. *�,. - ..�011� zc f�',y` i�k �. � ',Ci•K .. . �T�t3�.� . � 4 �. y�,K.I �1��f��i c,�ty �:'. '� 1.. � �A.� x '.'� ! ,.. v,' r . - � �� F'. Y ��;�. yk��.� f` ,. �L : .y .�. . �.� -.t *r. �e'�N ^�` �6r a{,j'�'P•� t; �JTi"`� ��t�K � " _ '1w:�. W r T. ^'�+��^) f•f� y .y r'. 1�� 1y �� '�y 1I-�'�X��.. _.«.d,�a� t r= + ti - �'.f � r.:xt�F. , t�'; f� � �y',�..�-`.�� ! r�� .�•ti•,�•� � �-��;�: f f:�. �r ci ,, J t`� � " � �'.s ^��j[, I 4 Y y j 7�: ` � . � µ��t��nte r.,r�� i -i'rF.,-'�� -�.e i4l' , ��.. �� _�.a�F�. �,/�� t r � .J.�� 'qT� ��.}.��d7 � �Y� �. ,j��', , 1 .F,J a� 'Vi,',� �e"�,�i � �� . � � y�� h. . �u�.1.� i� r�h r n t � - :�i.,a�J77F '. ��r 1-.�.• . , ,1 ; , Y 1 � � . .vM �•'�.tir/'? ��.'. ��. �r f ��» •.i` � ; ' ' -.e�� ` � A �h. . , � . Fp(� I �'! 1• ��• > 1� P�¢�y�" ( ... . ' � � �Y')� �t j,'� ' _ � �•��i � �_ } . . 1�.y �;i' !� ��.C��q ' .j�� i . ''� � ^��?!9f � ��'` �'� � �J � f ��! f .ii' 4 �' +��t�! � ! (�r�'j' ��flafb� .. } ? � �C��['� �` �' > '{(�. � �.� I� A �i � ��+ r � : . . , ��,J�y��,�;� �� p g!'3- , . �� 9 �� ,.i ��y�). 1 � �i 'i ,a .�.� ' � '�& •7 � ' 1/�� 'I ptN �fl��'�l � t,�'�� 1�`��'� t�ty �'� i . ' ,� �; 1 �� g�! r . �f� �� ..1'�9 il � �� rh � F 4. �N' yJ �.i�� f..� �,,,. 1155�� syj3l � � y . f �"Ir � - � t� �� Y `I�� ' + ,. A � f)p+ V � ` � ��i !:9 � ��' �1.� �. ��1 �� ;..�� d. � � ��'M11 � �� . J ��I 1 �l'D��e��Nr.�L�+ '� .. i ��. t.1 i o i i � � : 1 t � / �4�d � '�,��/, f 9 /7� �d ° �� i1 !11 � � �� { 'r t �l p► r �� lG � ; � ,, p�: I i• ��r 4 I ( rl 1:� ,1 �, /,1 r� ��a �1�� g�T�� t� �� , � !� lir�lf,��id r i� 1 �J��;�1� . �+,i � � 1�� +.✓ u 1 ' > ,� � 1;w� r�' � � � ,:��r�� + i."�� 1 i� � r f � ' i I '�p' '� � �j / , y � � �� ' +� .;� � n � �� i / �'�� " M�p�;�� o C i �� I: � � �i��' 1��'ti t' ' � ` ,'�� 1 �) � �� '�i � .,1 �,�;� r � � j,, � y u,�,�, ,,,�. n�l�� a 1� � "��_ t"'...,. �r��' t � , �F �j 13d�1�1��6►d�r�YO�;r+r. � r l �)�',��Id � �� @lM�r��' � i. � ;.�i"°� Photo 3: Looking northeast across wetland. " ,r `! . ,'S �,! 'Y^ •it��J" , �'k �'',`. � '�'4 " +� �` .Y -�. 1� x �','"� ''« .�, .� � , � k� x �r � =;�; ^ _ .��d�° .� �W s,' �i� r��`�".' r - , . �� l�a "`` pa�. "' t �'r# . �I 1' �•A r J ..Q ,yT'<.i�.'. . y 1 f' Se .� �+' r � � ..iy �J �r ��.� �+a k � � f•. { �ij"• ;p > � •, _ -+�i�- �'e-�.-. ��._- :.+Y r � <4' ac, � -., � -i =��' �n- t, '"�nr � ��c I�Y " ,wi,� %r..� �'��,.�- Z � - f ``.�''. r;. .�N 'M ' ..r--. f . F �.,. . ��n��r' I :.�' ,a ' � . t ,+wqF._ . t%'�� ' T�`� yt �� '> r... �3� � ,-'"'� i'• 'c�,aT��—°—�... - ,. +: {, ,�.,-,: k � - ,6:t� e� � � y,� � S i�.G�- y�. -O � .�YR.�c':�.• f�� .��y�,'`.• ..�•� �'"'sy Y.t .�/�.�s��'T,,,y:.� �6�"�w.��dF.�aC,.� r�f� "+`a - ��. � '�� Y i �l� �.y, �Q:.�.�r'. ti' � �ii�.- '� . d,.� = ,. e�s, Pltoto �4: Ucnsc, inti��i�� clali��n bcl�vccn unr�in�� lu� iSaii i,ruck. 2 Report Date:July 2006 P B S Project#:70477.002 Natural Resources Assessm :eport Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon �' •��_. n:,� � ±r` . "� � ,�' •Jy'� e , � � . �`'� , :� - �, _ . .y+� x .*� - ��:��- ��.r�.icT. - � � . J ' � 4 �•. , a .'. � "'� ....,!�� ,'a�l'-; a �,. �.Yp ,` a1 +�'�/ i��]*�n�� .:� ' S �L't9.��`��,,. L �s...�N9�..� � ri 4• ��,. � !�'- � � " -'� •u+,aQ"'2 � .�,� ��. .�-�_.� " r -��R� . 3� .� , +� �?!� , . �• :� �.j� ', p ��1;,� : 1•s� `P �, t � �F ql�• : l S � a:' `'R�. �' . ,.. �-�- ��" . _ ��' Yr x � ,;_: ;�.:��`� �:'�� .. � � �.: �� , ,,�° �,�. - � �.�t.� .� . � � .ti •j ''� �1. �'�►''F �1 �9 � ,�� p�.'` •J .�,• �� '�� .. ��:, , y .� �. , I.•, r . �^►� -�it'.. ,�� .�l.�a:� - .•. ! ...w. V r� � .. ..�� .�� , �•„ ,�� .�p.,��.��; �i •� p J "'^',}� 3Y'w,�,� � �.yf��+� ��..�.-b �� .,� �^• �� =:,�'±�-�;�-�" s�" � - Q::��'> . '�i,� . � Photo 5: Looking west, downstream at Ball Creek channel. 3 Report Date:July 2006 P B S Project#: 70477.002 � FIGURES . '� ;;w- ,;- I,t_ �. -. _ ��a�•��. �i ` -d` , � ��. �' y!��: ,..�:i� �� . �� :�.;,' � _� � •..�- ,� • � ,CL + ♦'l'•' • J,� ' ,�`�� S'�," �' ;;•�• �;�{•� ;�.� �: : � ^-► -,y/ ��•:.}' k ..`.�,,r � � r -�•..:� �}��r' :�';•h• . �:•�.. �• r, •t• �I� /� ••~_ _ ��..�.�� • .�:��i �� • • p�� • � r � � � ��`. . .,. ' � . .. . � �.;'; :.�: ' .na� 1�� ' -`'' ' ' � t " i:: �'`, � �� '� ,:' .-•. • .•�,` •' •_, . .� � '' '- : - - 6 {: 1,. � � �,. . #: � i� - ;y;:: . • • � � . �t"` Sch � -�-� ;, . ;;;•• : '�'%7' . �.� ' � �" � � .s ;��, ; .�j T i _ ';'=�. : h ;�. '; . _. �.. iz: �-�•. -- •• 'L ` �!�!�'r-� -i •_' C :�:+ c �r- , ' e• ♦ o f�T� _t .- ��' 1 -'��W� �,�- �� !/`, �_` �y , „� �; :: •�-� a • � . �- _ •,�.�, . • -:• --� �' �a� f"/ n-�,. ' � p; - .�7�+T17tT • ' Y' ♦ d i � j'. ' .;, r ' .-� ,s9.;` _-_� ,,,,� � � ',� _ •At • � �/ . � � 39 , 1 ,��, ` • '-� �� ', � f ., ��i� � , •. r - ��, � � � � ( ,� - - �:.,=; •." , -�p � � ` I.: � ; :��.�.,... � '{L,�—�. -,Nq �� a�., �� `��;�v�_,. • , � .�► _ , ' .- . , . � � `_ �r.. _ , - . -p �; �. - � • '� ,� � - .`�� .� � • � _ r . � ti�..;r.. . � --�, ;� � � . � 1 . 'C? ProjectArea �a � , ��. rr-. j ; � ;�, .\ \ �, M 1� .�. � • _—,� \ i �� '� .��' �' - '_ �;�_ �ir \ �� - ' `_ �'- , � ` ` . � , ••� -� � � y', _a_ ' aale# ` `� �� i� . \ �' � �� ' • r . • �� ; . r . -- � .y � ��C.` i; 1 .� - _ � •� • y :";. s " � _.._�- . _ . � . - :Boni - ,i - ■� � e_ �o,�--- ,.:, •'--- �`: � � �� - ., .- ',�, •,,� . d`•` ...: R �,r9� .,ti a� • =� .....i1D- �,9:-.— � + ' ` _�. , .�- . ?� _�-.s_ ' ' ..�.:: ,,� 4�_ ft•u; • ! 1 •�• '�( -• �• •� �l. �7 • c� •,, nr•• ' • l� •m '' J. , ,.,�, � � H• T - • - '' �:1' S:-t t � ' • ` •��+ • �•� �� . , i � � • ,' � ,i� _��. ►. � • ` ; ` � (a� '.'�.. _ •.�- N••� _. �' I l� �� l 7 ��1�J � ---_ •• �• . ��'O `�. • `�� '' �. � �'1� �� G�,....' _"'a�s '_ . _ _-` J3��_� �� • � • ' � • \ s — 1 _� Y„_� - "_"'' ^-_ .'� �� •• a � '� � �► : $. �• � ,' __ � �. '� ,ruek. Q ' _ . .. r� - � . j�:x1 , 1� 1 h� s , `-- � n ¢ �� R �i. 'Y v � �� -, ``I � � . ,��v U . � � i , ,.r-�-� 1 ' -''' �� Tr _ �i► � �4C - �' ;� � 1 � . `� .� � .., . � '' Y 7 , �' '�;�� . �� '. ��'x. • � ,,� z �� a �' '.'. � , � y' �'a Cr . � .`�� h= �' '!� � �.••'` � � . 5� •�^ '�I � ' i'; � �'SG • �,r.� :: � �` . �-.. .', � p ` r� O � �l. �' '� _ .. . .1 . - �' -.� ',__ " - _-�s ' � ! •i/.u• �b I •� � •'� � �:,. � �. .�j f:.. ': • .�. . �'d i: �� i, � �' �¢; ��r� ' k , Q; � 1'93.��:. .. •f_ _ - � f �, �`�.� �• _ , ,•' � �'�� • � !_ _ --i. - .._t.i �� r .. ; i ic;.� ryry� , � •t '' -= r--• - �QQ . V�:1 / ! ,� �� .� 1 '� �f •!�"'� Y� r � ./:: - 1 r� �. � � - ��` A • :j!_ �tp.�-,�.'�. c;. � � {-b • .• � ��,, • ti: • ; • \ t.,: . . • � +��,{ +,f / �.'� . G a ; f _ imie • ��, � . - � . • . . � . . • • � � - � - - -�_•'�./_,t� '�' ,. � �' , �'::,rl� r •• L . � ! - � - • .• . . . -- Source USGS Lake Oswego Ouadrangle OR,1581 Revised 1984. o�ti.na esai�m °EU9�ne N A P`°�8`t� VICINITY MAP FIGURE oa�e 14 00 SW 72nd Avenue P B S �uiy 2oos TIGARD, OREGON : _ _ - � ,�o i � �so I �`� � \ ' � I \ t70 I ; i 1 i \� � �i � _ _ ��i I I - —,� „ i � I I I I i ( i I � 2S112AA00300 I - � � � I � � -r — � N NI I 1f�j � ; i i — i ! ; � � yo � � i i I 0,0 ^ I I I I� Legend �, I �ProjectArea � —`- —Contours ��` � Tax Lots ONITA --- 1 �ap —Streets �:u �� N A � ,�� 2�� Feet PfOJeC# SITE MAP FIGURE �oa��.002 Gerber Legendary Blades n P B S oate 14200 SW 72 Avenue � .lu�y 2006 TIGARD, OREGON „r �: �I , ��- � t , a M • � '1� �# � 's� _ M �_�_; �` � �� ; -.-. z r M � � ' � � �� . "� � :� � � ”` � �' '� ��_�j _ , `t� 4. " e�Wnw.� � i , ' � I �.�. p • r -� t � ��" ' ��°p+�,- � `�� -�'` �"'f� 11 �1�'� � � .► �rt � " . _ . i + : r �.. -w �. .:,o � _ . �� t , • .. z .�_' . . ! �i � �� ,� - ' .. �' , " �.-�ek ' f . 9 . � � 'y . �, _ �� ' • k .,; � �� ' , � � �.�. � � �: s � r� _ �. , +� . , . , ' ' . � ; � , a _ a t . . - i' � � �� ''� . � . : � _ � � .. � � _� �� " � � + #� `r __ � � � .. _ �� r � � � a i �� ,♦,+�, ;; : � ,��„ . � ��- '+�►` �., _ s,i� �� _ _ _ � T = N . � > i� ar . �� . �- � � N �� . • �s , � � 4 , . . � � � ` - � �� .i . � . _ . � . � �'� . � r - t�, =�� e — � �Y� R � � � � .x: ♦ �� , _ - � � m ; ' ,;� �� . �� '� � �.� � , >•� ,�� : _ .�..� ��.�,�� w ....�-��. �,_;, �! � -"�, - �""� �,` . � _ . � ~ , � , � --. '-��_ ' • _ '.�_ .. , �,_._ ,: `�'r' � � F : � 3, �-- . . .��, k::. ` BONITA ��, � r ` ~ N A o ,oo �oo Feet P`°;e"#: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FIGURE �oa77.00z Gerber Legendary Blades � P B S oate 14200 SW 72 Avenue �uiy 2oos TIGARD, OREGON \ ,\ � � �I � LANDMARK + I i � N � } _.._. _-_.._._ . ...__'_.__ � � � � '_ __ ._'___._.. .. .. 1 � ��' – � � — _ — �: i — I ❑ Z � f i _ I ..._ _--_ __ _.______..—._ BONITA --------` / ¢ ___ --- O i � � � � � , � � z i' ! � � �, � � - -- � , % ' � Source NRCS So�i Survey of Wash�ngton Counry GiS Data inset n sneec i 2 -378-Quatama loam,2 to 7 percent slopes �Project Area �� Mytlric Hydric�nclusions N 41-Urban land Tax Lots (�V� 0 100 200 378 No Huberl A �Feet �Hydric Soil -SVeets 41 No None PfOfeC* SOIL SURVEY MAP FIGURE �oa��.002 Gerber Legendary Blades � P B S oa,e 14200 SW 72 Avenue �uiy 2006 TIGARD, OREGON ..�`a'�!'� i �. ' .��\l,.,',i,t�: �. ti;.t.' ��`�� , �� /�, •�� . � '- .-- ��,,�, " �y .�.� � , .� 1` � -,' l �y6�j'pilBtl�. •�. i:.•r.. : i � ;�, ; � �' .. :�:��.... � �� .,� � '� 53� �f«� �:;� ,� ,�s�.� ' F .. '. � � . . , .� �� y•,,` . -� � �,' '_l.::�n � _ _; 1 " :y -!.," - ,\ r . ' `j . . . 1* \` .e.� .� �l� `t'�� /' . � � ��" ,Ii�rS�M1}i �PF IX � .a, '�j � �.� � :�7 t.F -'�.n SC� I� � � / . � ` + � r(�,_ . ' .ti. �� }. .�,�d :,V'e .�_ \' ��:. ..a ,� : � i.. ` � , , '� • � ..� 7.' --. �.._. ..._. ,:��: r' � ^ '�� A ' �• , l _ � � r \ i" � ;� � �� .�,_ �--�a�- "_�"�.'.� � � �-� �'*-"�c-+.xc,x". �,�c�� 'r ,'f� ' .'� ' � �� •.. � --,;�t �� :�� S ' . '� ' 1 y' �. �•��`i= . - �, ! , \�t c_.., • � � . . \ � 6 � ��C �_ �. . ',e •� `� _ J� `). ' i'.� �� - � • �r ... a � .�LS' .' �� :� . t - •: ' '., ,�-.� 'ti . .. .�� _ ' i �` ' :�Nin. _ - '�,�• ---- � .\ �, . . � � L,s�ra;�:`�' . , • • � � • -�. -t'�K�,.:r—�� , .i - --� ,� _ ,�. , � . ,�. R,: . �, ;J , �',<�,., . �' ��' �'.. . � . Ri+ 1 �AN j . �� Iio��:A!.M i..b...�. . r,)` `'� I� �, . .•r � � ��` ` � � - � . �;� - �i Project Area ; . , ��', , �_nA ,-� ,y� ,. P! I � � ,;°�: '.� '• -:;PGOIY ' , � �.✓•—� ��•id: , �� :_�� ' ,.,, ,1 �� . r ....,, _..:.±.• �. . .� ' ' �� " ' � , i. �c:_~\.• •',—.� �_, �•. � . /.. .•�\.A1:11.'�1�� '�:...y: • � Y . I�h.' /• ._Y+a'.•'fJ�. ' �• �ay •�, , ,., � .�• . � ' � �,� � r� . t�� . J �, iw 'y + .S �:,. �.K�� ..._ � /. F � y � �..1 ..N , � �t� '`� , O ; �/ ' � �� • , '�. ' 1 /.� � i / . � . 1 . •�" .-�� ,/�� L. �[ '�� a�1Y ' .--% r. ;�Z% . �'�,_, �. _;- �J�`.�k _� �`� . :r;, �, ��,� . � � Y �+y�, �FOIV�'Yh��' ��' -. . . Ciiiii� • i-� x� �' L ` d t . . _ { �S � � �:..�.' ' l. k „p,�. ,;'` �; ,.-- :� /;rm,r 1� ,rt � � -''�1 r � ^�:sr�r � a u ti.. • ./`;��tc . . �It��w•�»�+. - ��.:r� p ��O(�S 1( � ^ �/.A:. • �-• 4�C i� i �'":�'� '"J �4. �'2 [ � �: : � , 'R . .�� ..�,��,t�l� •, 4 � � � � l u � a� � <•. . � - - a3owKz .,,tiI "�� « z,�, y ,.;Y• _ ' . F� . " • •z._ �_ .� " NOTE:The GIS data available from the USFWS ' �� " �� Dc �iY Wetland Mapper does not show any wetlands , % .f.;. 'v�; s, ' �, � as existing on the site. � .�►y �.�`� -� 1 _�. -�--- � --_��- �� • e ' '''• •�. t�,��. � °r -,� . N Source�.US Fish and Wildlite Service National Wetlands Invenrory Lake Oswego,Oregon. A � ,00 2a0 Feet Pro�eciN NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY FIGURE �oan.002 Gerber Legendary Blades G P B S oa�e 14200 SW 72 Avenue J �uiy 2oos TIGARD, OREGON � �.� '�i � : �► � `'�� ;` �� . :: : �� ` � -�-- - . .. . /., � �� - � �� -..� ` �� - ; � � - .. . , ■ • .. . �-- ■�� r�� . • - �'/�r �� r�� :� _ '_ ,``� � � �� ■� �/\ ��.• ' .� i i�� - ;. -=� � � f� ��; �..1 .� ■ � :��/ ��.� r��!��_ ��ti� ��■ �m R�.� �' �,i:.: � �-a�-� �i��A. r�� .�,.,, �� iii � � �i�f''� � �� !-= �_,. . _ ;�� r �,!' �� ,•L'.,.' l,, - � �� --i�� '�1�i►��i` �� , 1 �� !�'1.',^. �I�i��` � � �� , �lr��'IlNlll I�� ► - . - • - 'a' � �� .j�llin�►1�-r,r�=° �, �� w��;�iuu�l�-��_. r �->,. � � ��;,_�nn ��`:�111..��U,. �, � _ � ■ �l E=�,1_1:IN,-�;i:l��'`��-:*�� . � �: �11L"��l�l��/ ^ ��y►� ._..--- � � � — --.+Ir�� y�.-�:�'1 � � 1�� r/� _/III�1111111�+.:� ♦ �: ��;, � .� � �� ::, ►'� � °'�=1!!:-'i�=�' � ■ '"`�`'11 ; f ...w��,�. _ � � � , � � ■ i��:�`�� I:% �"�_ _r � c.� �� w�.�N�� ►..��iu� �� I,► �� ` w��,+� ��• � ` ( � ■i...s ••�� . �.:�� =�� r��,!l�� 1�'+Ssl �� i�r .n: `�i�i��`■ �"�`��'" � -�`: . �.,., �_ _ ��..�-_- � ..�� r�� '.r�. .�►-. ._�_.y ....:�� ..� � �.,��+ r��i�i =�11111��,• r - ��/� i��'+�� s.� u��. �r: �'� R i �� r��i/■_-■..� � .'�\,� ' � r�� <<I��:-:i�� ,• �: �:� �;�� , ` � ��■ II��■ a�II� �� II 7 J��i� 1 � ., ..... .N. •-�-r° � �� I , ,�-. -. -�'�.��.� � �� i��!'� /lt1 �, � �� iiii� i��r .nn�-�r� ��'. � � ��:i�■ ■■■■i ��11 R1111�II�r �UI��q�l � �r/ �� ■ ■ � �111�fl�1�� ■�;��' � � �h ,... �:.. .�.4. -i� "..- _- -- �: � � ,... . I. . ._ __._- � • '�� ......�,__ -- -- .. ...�, w : N�/��rl CC�� 7: IN a��■� � : �u� I�r= =r=• ��■■::■■-n� �%��o�i��a��►.� rr - . �� 111111 �1N!■11 ��' � • �un�uy "� �`�,al 111111i11N1 0 •�� _ �� , a i�♦ ��, ��,�/� � �� r� .� •: • ' �: : : �: �� =�'��N! �..�' - �'�Ill � �� 1��IU1�� i�■��iL � i�. , ��■ �. _ �� '�IIn11B11 �� f11 :111�11�1 1l�i111��1 �� '•�. ` �11��11'1 . ��1�H�1�111 ■111■111111�� ,�` � I� 1 1�1RIt �`�_,-;� I w. ��i.r l��.Yi'1�=;.,:n� - � � ' ■ _ � � � •- �• �� - .- -.- .. _.- � � .. - �� . � - - � � ��. • -� • - • ��-�: - � — — —� .�E.54„',-�. . ' — __ --- . _ _� � � I � _'._ . _ _._ _- . ./ � ' I I� �� B6;1'CH.iJARk' � � �I, -��- - - - -- ------- - �1' � �.� . .-- ---- - --- - � L6GE1'D r.sw.c,zrv ra+r.c,<Hn�1 crsurn: .. ' � . . � '. .. s�rz»xscn a c cc a�o�c•v'aa.s� . , , '... rv av��scza rr-e��i:t S� ., N -dlvC.•v�a,r �K . l0 PoxC ,R' �- C C[CVi'iPV lY �` ;�` • � , :. r�s,.�� •)i6B!c£ ..rvlw Pl�: .r;. � /� ��' � �� I - � � �-� _��,o � - - - � . � . ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL . _ . � �� I ' . �� VERT/CAL DATG:N ' � I�� 1310 MAIN STREET -- - - : � % VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON 98660 � SPwi• �wP<<<a%�� PHONE:(360)690-0331 1 _ ,�,,w,.,,w,..�r�:.�e �._ � �� FAX:(360)6969064 � � � _� � �, ��. ..oro�a.n�s.,��.��,K,, j , � � S/TE BENC'HMaR/f � I http:l/www.pbsenv.com , . r ` �� , `I � � ..- si.rrwx�wnr�s�A�r.vc,rvc ef c.i.um. , � ' ...,_ _ .._._ .:. ,.,,r . , i �vwS�' a.`OJ OS�✓�G N�.�X �n��Snv.0/ �'J :fX 'I SIXi�lr[Y MC SLY.�M[Lt4?'.�L DOG � � �r � I MPV.w!� i5 JT fFll NCWIM LY Mf CDG!C✓ � /�/ 11' �SNr . flv�^pv CY w/h 5'3l'll' — � I�.�� _ � l �� ' � _ �� '�!-�`S'�� I t � '� � ,'� � . \ �,� � �:,. I . . .. , .. ��. � - - � �, �o.�.� . ��.. , , � o, . ,. ` �'� ��. .,j . . . . �... �� o . �,��\,� I I O � � �� , � � _ ,��1 :: I � v) �_� � �, � - (�I � ,' , � ' �� : � ;� J; i� ;�; � w � _ ___ � :� � , i �� z � , , � � z ��.�A �,�� I � � w o J . � `� � ,y" � " .., \ f N.�� I � � � w � � \ ',' - ; � � Q q � , �� '' � �'��i ' �,' � ZZ � �� ' -' � r .�, , � \ � � �� ` � W � � � ; � � � �� , .�� W � � :, e ��, �� , • � Q � v� � � � / ��. ��. �, �� o � a �� o H , � / : , .,, s � � , - �'f.i� � �` ` - �--1 � �, _, � ,, �.,� ��. ;�" ��- r, - , — — � , �, �, � � F—+ �Y � �, - a. , ; ,,,�� " . f--] __. �, � �� W `" � _ � � � ,,--_� STUDY AREA ��_ / ��. � � _ � � � , �'� r r ' � � ��^� �`' ` — — — — — — — — — — — ._ — —_ _— — — — _— — — � • . � a � � ._,. �--1 — � � ��-� �"�i -+� - SPA7e C� - - � ' � -�` " - A6 i�- �, ��.,n � �` `, �. .' � r�- �r ir'� ... ��..i . �� . . ' a , ,��.,, . ' ,., - - --`.�/-.-_ V .. �-.. �•� �._ _ - - - .^.�L . �.,.. . -�'"- _ m �_- - - - _ _ _ - �,�.�_ � _ -_ �-_- ,... r�- _ � "��- �'' �1:�f� ;,-. : � _ � , ' , �, r ,�• �;'� �- --±��LJi -*`- -- _ T� �-L �� r ��" - ` % � ��. , r ,� , _, - f . � ._._ _ .� � � -_� ' -;:� �._:, � �- _-- '-- - -.'c _ - � --- �-%'�� -_� • '— —--_- r"�--��-- _-L-'•_�-=- -=�- f�- - " - �` � - � , , , _ __ _ � . - -- - ,.. .� �� / � � -- ---... -----�- —�- -- -� ��--'. _ -� i...4y _ . �---- . . -. . _._. 5 � . - --__ .\.. - ,. _. , , _— ..�. . � £II .?' . � /'4 C -� ' _ . � , _ , _. a ° / r � . . _—_. � � . _ _._ __ _ __ . . ' . / \ ' .G _ ._.' — ' ' ``— . - -_' _ ._ _ — �'�—_`. �.. � ,f . .��. .r__. _ — _ *l I , �• ---`�c•-' _-W— _ _ � _ sP�9�• . �s, . . � �, � -��.�'' i � � . �-��._� "' _ - ---. �'� _ ---- __ , / �� •SPAB� � - _ � . .. � A � � r : � ` _ --- —_._---- — EX�ST�NG CONCRETE wEIR � �-' .. I —� . �_. � i\-- ..;�.� j" WETLAND AREA=5194 SF .��' t��.�� I a �_ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — � --�" I —J NOTES: 1. SURVEY PROVIDED BY STATEWIDE LAND SURVEYING, INC. �\ 2. WETLAND BOUNDARY SURVEYED BY STATEWIDE LAND " Pn�iccr?#: �1GURF. SURVEYING,INC.SUPPLEMENTAL POINT LOCATION COLLECTED BY �0477.�02 PBS USING TRIMBLE GEOXT GPS UNIT WITH SUBMETER POST o� zs so• ,00• PROCESSING ACCURACY. Dace: 7 SCALE: 1"=50' �UL��ZllO6 APPENDIX A Photo�n-aphs Wetland Delineation Report Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon �'C t i' �� r; ' �, � �.'.K '��:�i .,::+5 �_ � . ' ...� ` � r . . -R S `'' - � /`' �e ti�.. � _�4 �.�+ . . . `��' � k� .i.� � . . 'ro� �.. - j� 5_' . �.3'. r:, - �.� r• K' � � - , :�r. � ,�d.--,�—�� r��.�k'��;� `, , ;',�`°: - _ —,w.�'s 'j �ti�f �A.� . ...H _-. _' _ � . 1 �,`�A� ' e'ri �,h �`�' �'� w�.�./��- _ ?, �7�'y!� ,,�� ','�' . �`.�� , i. �,,,... �; ,a .., ` �r�� . .: ,: �' .` r'� � r��,�,��. �',�j. 4 � . '� cy; � .^��h� Si V� ...+t ...� � .! � ' 'R�Y .�`�p�;t�� ,�►'�' A�'_�. .1.,.,.� �b.�''+ ' �+y� 7 ' ��+ � a '��"�'^�"t• 'W� � �:' !. ,+ v r r.�� !� :I,i �F�T 'f��r'.'' ,.±� ��.% ' o � +�•. . _ ./^t -+�' fi' ��_ :1\ , "�'.�';� `,� � ti��-. ? ��c y ; � 1 ,. ; C; ,� i ,'!;' _ h�.��' i. v� 't�. �;� ': �..,��-,� �� . .� �P:�. � , ... � ` �•�J t�M . � �+�.' k ,�,}�:+til�`�' '�.:..� ii� . ��y� ' �� . . ri�.y�r ./+, � s ��. � y^ �+ t � ��y�� r r � � � .. ,( � .' �� . , fi � N. �9�;4fn a � x 4�'��i�r e;. �ir �, . � � �a..."'.e)Y1 4A:�`� 3 . .. b: .�lA j . _ .> _ ._.. ... ...s...., ._ ._ . . . .. > . ....�. Photo 1: NE corner of property looking south along Ball Creek. f y� 1 ' t� d ,�¢ „��}�i�;�r rR��, /'_.y. 'i�`�'''� . Y ;��R'�` s�'"y. _ •(�� y , �r -f ;: vAC� k . .. ��* i ��'_ - 1�.,. �;,^ ''��.y��_ �%�'�c. '` . hC .� �a� y � "ff.�t � �, "tr,�''��`', _� �* � ' �7► '� o o� U3 _ . � �� . � � V. � Y��i jr ia '$�"'°.+ r�'��V ' . af }n(`�:"'�.r � '�,��e f yY t"'.: .:��,p+��,' � .�� F�•�`YIy�{� • �e��''{ -'.l,. .� �' +�, :�' � :i�/ ri',�v: +..�� . . ., , �,� 1. %�pt `� K /.. �.:+„�i`� ' � � . X � . � l' . `,'��N! ��a �'` 1 ?��'` ' �`�r^,,"3h� ,,�,�., r �`� � ";,d` � � � ' + , � ��. .s .:;f � li.��.� 5 L�k' S ��a�Y� �d' . �� ` w��a �r-;. tiC '.' ..r,� y� . -- '' '.�n y „�s �._. � � . . '� .d • r _ ). � �'�% �� }, �.,�� t_.�', , ,. � � R_ �.��1 �� . .. y�l,tt . ,��"it�'"�� id.ai ` �L'`a�9 ��i�'+/'y � ti��'af��`,�, �. �'Z�'� o`� ��fa��s. ��F�ti yy ;. ;��}�'*� FA:. . �' T�� 1�� N' K'- iv�t' a�+� '{� � • ♦ a�''�, \� ?�� `• ' �1 �R��M b e�R��,...�+ � . �� yy��i�� . ��; .. � I .. � ""I'.t� .�.ti ,}c�.y�suJ � �� ;� : . v "�� . ��7 �� ..... � � w:4�t 1r'.� .,� .w� r I' rJ.'f�r ��•t�.�:,• � , k�� • ' � .:i. . f . . . ��,�1� � ?a.`. ��\�+i�r � . i � � �4;� 1/�.. � �..n�� 'ti �1. ,�,, ., �F� y s�`S� .� ';�'' _t��; �', r�:a ,. + y��'�, � � ��1��, . � ; � � .. ' � 4� �� s,� �,�"]'r e, ' . ��'�L's ,�l ' ,\ �;/h .y{� {Jh�T' �r jt cSf �`Ah ,J-v.! 'j��'� � �Ly �`'�ll,; �� , �/� • � . M�� , �. , wl �r.S"d.�i�. � f f, �' � .. r' . ' `^'g';�y��4�!��j;:"� . _ �r�r�� Photo 2: Lookin�east�into wetlancl iii soutlieast corner of property at coullu�ncc ��f Ball Creek and Carter Creek. Interstate 5 onramp in background. 1 Report Date:July 2006 PB$ Project#: 70477.002 Wetland Delineation Report Gerber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon Z � �!,- , . � � n � � � �� p+.F � ' . +��l�'Y 1 ��,S jy�v .�:-� :,+--i--• :, �.,�t�� *� �,y a ri � '�"i""�P�A�7�y^+!,��r +.�;� �,��.��. '' ,y w � ��:' y� . .➢E!!.�IR,a�+'�..'. � �. ., 4 ,.�!• y.� � �. � a��+?�+� -•� f+p �,f �� n ('�1�� # � � � � '` � W.: .. � �� '. . a�, ��A �, �-�.�, `F;� ,��k ai:t� p' � � � �s Y��.�� i »�� . �!fi� r!'ti �- �sT�.�-� j�� r �&' Y' �4� . yF . n�. ��. �I k Y.;'+�..� �.. '``�<'�.� �„�..:.`lt C '�.' ��-n� ..;s , ""4Y��a ... . : ��..�'� . - �"�^' � Ati S� �."ri,""4y ,7- � . �» � l _ `�' . � � � ��'F " �� }a ��.�RCS�� t l f�a� ' � . � ♦ �� MTt v'e'_�JLy,t!• `"/ t �'f 3`��K� - � `ij��'`� �4`. . 4 y`� '!_ , � F: p y`�. "��. "�hr�!~�y . , r�t'�`�. R f� iA � ��b�.� � "r+nY%�[ .,Yt°^' -,L�'rn3�� .t�'"� r _� � S �,� a � �' ��. wt'��.b�/ej�'i f..� � � � S � � iro , �, t3 c �.axti j �, ' � r 1 e� / J f � 4 7 F`��f�r � � ��yy,�s �N� c �, ' � ^ r :� �� w� t �y�1` -: �s✓,.,�. � � '. r �'r f�-° � r m.4 1 y� a> ' t � � �1��. � �,. �... 4: ,.'F - . , � n �W _.. . . 1�4� i} ' _ . .��ree ,F �: 4I � ( +S, r ��a�s.. 'f, f .�y� A_.. 1 `�� 9 ''-0L k 1R�� i� 1 J'Y�`� . � '�, .'yi t y . , ,� I ' 3 � . . �` 1��S ,�� & �:�,�e$nf i�iF�rs . ,i'f'�� ,•� �l, �!i��ir c�.] �.. .. � ��A�t� � � i / � � i1 � ��^b' �� '�y.,Y�,� �I,- � � � k � rr4 � � r � �,� ,- � `� � r� s�q . �'� �� n� ��"�� iP��B�p� lIIl�yi � ! � �ti � �r�,�ip1 �� iy } ` �,�/� � +4} � {� �', J1 �� _ta� ��'1 '`� �f; � � -r��„ , , , j� r �� Jd� r �°��Pi ,4 �� . � � ti� bl�Y� �1",�� YO•i ��.�� E Y � p� i1:�, � r ,��f�Ii �.�F�i��p►✓� . �� J rl�,�;' �� '�". ��r� � � .f jl�r j :�a i rd � �R"! l,voyl�� , y.i � r � � rJ o��r.� � f�.,r C�rl �i� �r�� K.# ��I, k��r ! � � � Ya � �E � i � d��` i /�i,�i� �i . �� '.I � � �) � �,'P;b��r) �Y� }�i r ��Y 'y �� II �' � j ' 1 i l �S , f .�� .'1 y I �.1: PA1 r � t�'�II� 6 i �y = �� ,.y�� f 1 � I.�1 1� �� f � �� f��'� ,�� ,°:�� .ro , ' � � � ��,q.f�,i��l��9t��'#'��,��!'�i r;�� , ?,��t� ,,y�fi��,��i� .5• x !� �° Photo 3: Looking northeast across wetland. _ �, : , � �� ,� �.,�' f �� µ �r , � � �° ' � ��` ,}; � � A �.;�i1. <:3•�� (�~ { � ..t"��C%°-. /.J t C��` F :j _. ._\ y� Y�� l�x'U' �`� a. �o! .` � "T �'� k.. ��.' sy�, a� � j "'� .. �� "�i. � � �a� u,a�� +� . . .. aY�.� � f .:t t ��:.�'1"'�7��.. �k� �-i8,4"�?.L \, y' ; � N. � `�` '^1 IL�' - � :j� �=,r �- � - '� 1��`: ;, �°:� � � � �' ��-� _ �' : �±" t �- � C ��, .. � �+'$a j,+� 5 II11 � �h� ° �� ; + �� 9 '.x, r �.. �� , `'� c�0.�'�' � �� a`�.. j� u� 5'."L'+1qz��yi'�+A, i r -� .��r b _ _ �,�..� / '�., �i�� `t � °i `Y�°s'�+'C�!, t, .5r �,-., �:;:� �, ,',,,r y.''+ ,/r St� r � '-�C; �iiK;� F� z- (@�'•s; :� `J' .4 K r" i�,. K n-; .'� y . �� . °� �� .-`+� � -�'-�u 3 ��_..a �� ". .��. � ., °e..3,:.y�/ �. .� �`�. �; � //�� S �d�!'� "°'��'.�� `�� x -� � r % ;a�:. �; �x #'�'�'G��:¢� ! ::,� �°�';,�M...�'t �'"r�`_ �r � .��'"" � . °� \ � '-�!L�-st` ,p� �°"��xx .w j�.`�—'£ �ia p.'^ ��;�. ,.� -`i t � � .,�-- ar� .�.. �'e�1� � _ '. M ��f�..�'3�4"a.'�. � ��"��'� '� �\ .��• �.� }�'� ° .,. � �t ,�.. �� II� A�::. . .y � * � . ��►-• . ..�. _ 'I'l' Photo 4: Dense, invasive vegetation between onramp and Ball Creek. 2 Report Date: July 2006 P B S Project#: 70477.002 Wetland Delineation Report .�erber Legendary Blades Tigard,Oregon � � • 4� x� � 'i't' ��`K ,,r-j,w,. � �� y„ ,:� � � ! ny�}, � % � ,� � .;f�# ��. � . � � � r---:.._ F' .,:+ . �' " \� .. - �1 y\+'� . p�'Y. __.L�,.,.•t«I,�! �c_��5�.��`�'��r++ �'. .� y 8 K�C°S' � rs �" � ��;w�'�L� _ 4 •_ .j"�, s � ti E- 4 �� ;�y�,. �.}: 1' �'+i: ��J 7 '�. �� a� E . . -��' {'�' .-i� ..�,. ,� - � ~ 1 L..,L a '�" ,¢ k. ,A,./ +�;".�y4 . �� * A�Y� �-er"�t?�� .', '��. "z'�"'°f� _ti: '�"^ ^a' r! . �r ' �: S/� i�::,..� � -�-,�-�` �,.,��L �.� � - .�I l: 1 ;� ��. �fr��.f�� i -�:. j. `'L. ia ` Y° y j' ' - `S F ��}- � ,.. ,� �� _ � r s ' N � `�'�'� �1 _ '�.�� I� �,;a >-� .� `�;. ��S` _ ` :��>�� f;,� `->s � '-a- - ti14`� � � � � _x - � '•.� t",��a,�f;.l..��k � t �'�11 i � , �, I"I �I :� �� y .. y� '5�,� ^'� >�'�'+F !`y!',r.�, � � sq � _I/ �. �i •� ,� -`.s� �� .,��'a1 � ' �}`,f',• � .,bT r �a' - r�,. c�--� t^r:: Il; . F�` f � 'y1.'� � �:��h,t..�.�R Y` 3 � � ' •+i�.r- � . ,�� f' �,�t�� .� � �.�: -��:F' � �,'�'-d°T�_ �� ..�. � 7 � '�3.�f�'"�, �� .� ,`�8 ��" .,'6.�. _ • �' "� r..� • .- -.. . ��k+.�II".� �.'' .. Photo 5: Looking west, downstream at Ball Creek channel. 3 Report Date:July 2006 PBS Project#: 70477.002 APPENDIX B Data Sheets P�� ROUTINE WETLAND DE'TER1�11NATION DATA FORM (1987 Corps Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Gerber Legendary Blades Date: 5/25/O6 Applicant/O�vner: Fiskars Brands lnc. /Gerber I,egendary Blades Div. County: Washington Investigator:J. Clark,J. Glabek City: Tigard State: OR S/"T/R: NE 1/4 ofNE 1/4, S12, T2N,RIW Do Norn�al Circumstances exist on the site? � Yes ❑ No Community ID: - Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical)? ❑ Yes � No Transect Ill:— Is the site a potential Problem Area'? ❑ Yes �No Plot Location: L of parking lot, W of crk. Explain: Plot Ill: SP-A1 VEGETATION (for strata, indicate T=tree; S=shrub/sapling; H=herb; V=vine Dominant Plant Species Stratuin Raw %Cover Rel. %Cover Indicator pominant Lotus cor��ici�la�us H 30 same FAC � Holcus la��ati�s H 5 FAC ❑ Vu! ia bromoides H 25 NI � Bromus hordeaceus H 10 UPL ❑ Plantago la��ceolata H 5 FAC ❑ Poa irivialis H 25 FACW � ❑ ❑ 0 0 a Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC: 2/3=67% Check all indicators tl�at apply,and explain below: �>50%of Dominants OBL, FACW,or FAC ❑ Physiological or Reproductive Adaptations ❑Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of ❑ Personal knowledge of regional plant prolonged inundation or saturation communities ❑Morphological Adaptations ❑Wetland Plant Database ❑Technical Literature ❑ Other(ex lain): Hydrophytic vegetation present? � Yes 0 No Rationale/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season?�Yes 0 No Based on: SCS soil survey YES Recent Weather: Rain Field Observations: Primary Indicators: Secondary Indicators: Depth of inundation: None ❑ Inundated (2 or more required) Depth to free water in the pii: None ❑ Saturated in Upper 12" ❑ Oxidation Around Live Roots in De th to saturated soil: None ❑ Water Marks Upper 12" Check all that apply and explain below: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water-stained Leaves ❑ Recorded Hydrologic Data Available ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Loca] Soil Survey Hydrology ❑ Stream Gauge Data ❑ Drainage Patterns in Data ❑ Aerial Photographs Wetlands ❑ FAC-Neutral Test of Vegetation ❑ Other VVetland hydrology present? ❑ Yes�No Rationale/Remarks: sr-�i SOILS Map Unit Name(Series and Phase): Urban Land Map Unit No.:41 Taxonomy (Subgroup): NA Drainage Class: NA ❑ Listed on National or Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Has Hydric Soil Inclusions Field observations confirm mapped type'?� Yes �No If No, Explain: Depth Horizon Matrix colors Mottle colors Mottle Abundance Texture, concretions, (inches) (Munsell moist) (Munsell moist) size and contrast structure,etc. 0-5 lOYR 3/2 silty clay 5-7 lOYR 3/1 lOYR 3/2 l�aint silty clay 7-8 lOYR 3/2 sandy clay 8-18 lOYR 3/3 silry clay Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ❑ Histosol ❑ Matrix Ciuoma 5 2 with Distinct or Prominent Mottles in Upper 10" ❑Histic Epipedon ❑ Mn or I�e Concrctions (>2 mm in top 3 inches) ❑Sulfidic Odor ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils ❑Aquic or Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑Reducing Soil Conditions(positive test) ❑ l.isted on }�ydric Soils List, Matches Soil Protile �Gle ed or Low Chroma(<_ 1 Matrix ❑Other(Explain): Hydric soils present? �Yes �No Rationale/Remarks: The lOYR 3/1 was only present in a 2 inch layer. �Vetland Determination Hydrophytic vegetation present? � Yes Q No Is the sampling point within a wetland? ❑ Yes �No Hydric soils present? � Yes❑No Wetland hydrology present'? ❑ Yes�No Rationale/Remarks P�� ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINt1TION D:1TA FOR�1 (1987 Corps Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site:Gerber Legendary Blades Date: 5/25/06 Applicant/Owner:Fiskars Brands Inc. /Gerber Legendary Blades Div. County: Washington Investigator: J. Clark,J. Glabek City: Tigard State: OK S/7'/R: Nf� 1/4 of Nl: 1!4, S 12, 12N, R 1 W Do Normal Circumstances esist on the site? � Yes❑ No Community lU: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical)? ❑ Yes � No Transect IU: Is the site a potential Problem Area? ❑ Yes � No Plot Location: F.ol�parkin� lot, W of crk. Explain: Plot ID: SP-�12 VEGETATION (for strata, indicate T=tree; S=shn�b/sapling; H=herb: V=vine Dominant Plant Species Stratum Raw %Cover RcL `%Cover lndicator pominant Geum mucro !t •llum }I 20 same FACW- � Holcus lanatus H 20 FAC � Ranunculus re ens H 40 FACW � Poa trivialis H 20 FACW � ❑ O—J ❑ ❑ ❑ D Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators Percent of Dominant Species that are OBI.., FACW or FAC: 4/4=100%, Check all indicators that app]y,and explain below: �>50%of Dominants OBL,FACW,or FAC ❑ Physiological or Reproductive Adaptations ❑Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of ❑ Personal knowledge of regional plant prolonged inundation or saturation com�nunities ❑ Morphological Adaptations ❑ Wetland Plant Database ❑Technical Literature ❑Other(ex lain): Hydrophytic vegetation present? �Yes❑ No Rationale/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the gro�ving season'?� Yes �No Based on: SCS soil survey YES Recent Weather: Rain Field Observations: Primary Indicators: Secondary Indicators: Depth of inundation: None ❑ Inundated (2 or more reyuired) Depth to free water in the pit: None � Saturated in Upper 12'� ❑ Oxidation Around Live Roots in De th to saturated soil: l0 in. ❑ Water Marks Upper 12" Check all that apply and explain below: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water-stained Leaves ❑Recorded Hydrologic Data Available ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ 1_ocal Soil Survey Hydrology ❑ Stream Gauge Data ❑ Drainage Yatterns in Uata ❑ Aerial Photographs Wetlands � FAC-Neutral Test of Vegetation ❑ Other Wetland hydrology present? �Yes 0 No Rationale/Remarks: SP-A2 SOILS Map Unit Name(Series and Phase): Urban Land Map Unit No.:41 Taxonomy(Subgroup): NA Drainage Class: NA ❑ Listed on National or Local Hydric Soi1s List ❑ Has Hydric Soil Inclusions Field observations confirm mapped type'?�Yes Q No If No, E:xplain: Depth Horizon Matrix colors Motile colors Mottle Ahundance "I�exture, concretions, (inches) (Munsell moist) (Munsell moist) size and contrnst structure,ete. 0-6 lOYR 3/1 silty clay 6-1 g 2.SY 6/1 lOYR 5/3 Promincnt, mixed silty clay matrix Ilydric Soil Indicators:(check all that apply) ❑Histosol � Matrix Chroma < 2 with Distinct or Prominent Mottles in Upper 10" ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑Mn or Fe Concretions(>2 mm in top 3 inches) ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic or Peraquic Nloisture Regime ❑Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils � ❑ Reducing Soil Conditions(positive test) ❑ Listed on Hydric Soils List, Matches Soil Profile � Gle ed or Low Chroma(<_ 1 Matrix ❑ Othcr(Explain): ❑ydric soils present? � Yes❑No Rationale/Remarks: Wetland Determination Hydrophytic vegetation present? � Yes Q No Is the sampling point within a �vetland? �Yes ❑ No Hydric soils present? � Yes❑No Wetland hydrology present? � Yes❑No Rationale/Remarks P�� ROUTINE 1VETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORI�I (1987 Co s Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Gerber Legendary Blades Date: 5/2_S/06 Applicant/Owner: Fiskars Brands Inc. /Gerber Legendary I3lades Uiv. County: Washington Im�estigator:J. Clark,J. Glabek City: Tigard State: OR S/T/R: NE 1/4 of NE 1/4, S 12, T2N, R 1 W Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site'? � Yes Q No Community ID:— Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical)? ❑Yes� No 'rransect 1D: - Is the site a potential Problem Area? ❑ Yes�No Ylot Location: i0 feet W of fevy, Explain: Plot ID: SP-:'13 VEGETATION (for strata, indicate T=tree; S=shrub/sa ling; H=herb; V=vine Dominant Plant Species Stratum Raw%Cover Re1. %Cover Indicator llominant PIIGIQI'1S[I7"lf)lLIlRQCLa H ]00 same FACV11 � ❑ � � � D O a 0 ❑ 0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 1/1=100% Check all indicators that apply,and explain below: �>50%of Dominants OBL, FACW, or FAC ❑ Physiological or Reproductive Adaptations ❑Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of ❑ Personal knowledge of regional plant prolonged inundation or saturation communities ❑ Morphological Adaptations ❑Wetland Plant Database �Technical Literature ❑Other(ex lain): Hydrophytic vegetation present? �Yes 0 No Rationale/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season'?� Yes�No Based on: SC3 soil survey YES Recent Weather: Rain Field Observations: Primary Indicators: Secondary Indicators: Depth of inundation: None ❑ Inundated (2 or more reyuired} Depth to free water in the pit: None � Saturated in Upper 12�� ❑Oxidation Around Live Roots in De th to saturated soil: 10 in. ❑Water Nlarks Upper 12" Check all that apply and explain below: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water-stained Leaves ❑ Recorded Hydrologic Data Available ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Local Soil Survey Hydrology ❑ Stream Gau�e Data ❑ Drainage Patterns in Data ❑Aerial Photographs Wetlands ❑FAC-Neutral Test of Vegetation ❑ Other �'Vetland hydrology present? �Yes ❑No Rationale/Remarks: SP-A3 SOILS Map Unit Name(Series and Phase): Quatama Loam, 3-7 %slopes Map Unit No.:37B Taxonomy(Subgroup): Fine-loamy,mixed,mesic Aquultic Haploxeralfs Drainage Class: moderately well drained ❑ Listed on National or Local Hydric Soils List � Has Hydric Soil Inclusions Field observations confinn mapped type?� Yes �No If No, Explain: soil is hydric Depth Horizon Matrix colors Mottle colors ]�1ottle�Abundance Texture, concretions, (inches) (Munsell moist) (Munsell moist) size and contrast structure,ete. 0-5 lOYR 3/2 sandy clay 5-9 lOYR 3/3 sandy clay 9-16 lOYR 2/1 silty clay Hydric Soil Indicators:(check all that apply) ❑ Histosol ❑ Matrix Chroma 5 2 with Distinct or Prominent Mott]es in Upper 10" ❑Histic Epipedon ❑Mn or Fe Concretions(>2 mm in top 3 inches) ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils ❑Aquic or Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Reducing Soil Conditions(positive test) ❑Listed on Hydric Soils List, Matches Soil Profile �Gleyed or Low Chroma(< 1)Matrix ❑ Other(Explain): Hydric soils present? � Yes�No Rationale/Remarks: Wetiand Determination Hydrophytic vegetation present? � Yes�No Is the sampling point within a��etland'? �Yes ❑ No Hydric soils present? � Yes Q No Wetland hydrology present? �Yes 0 No Rationale/Remarks P B S ROUTINE ��ETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FOR1��I (1987 Co s Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjecUSite: Gerber Legendary Blades Date: 5/2S/06 Applicant/Owner: Fiskars Brands Inc./Gerber Legendary Blades Div. County: Washington Investigator:J. Clark,J.Glabek City: Tigard State: OR S/'I'/It: NE 1!4 of NE 1/4, S 12,T2N, R 1 W Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? � Yes Q No Community ID:— Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical)? ❑ Yes� No Transect 1D: Is the site a potential Problem Area? ❑ Yes� No Plot Location: I S feet E of SP-A3 Explain: Plot ID: SP-A4 VECETATION (for strata, indicate T=tree; S=shn�b/sapling; fI=herb; V=vine Dominant Plant Species Stratum Raw%Cover Rel. %Cover lndicator pominant Phalaris aru��diriacea H 5 same FACW ❑ C•tisus sco arius S 30 NI � Rubus discolor S 60 FACU � E uiseturn a�ti�ense � H 3 FAC ❑ � Poa t��ivialis H 2 FACW ❑ a 0 0 D D O llydrophytic Vegetation Indicators Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC: 0/2=0% Check all indicators that apply, and explain below: ❑ >50%of Dominants OBL, FACW,or FAC ❑ Physiological or Reproductive Adaptations ❑ Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of ❑ Personal knowledge of regional plant prolonged inundation or saturation communities. ❑ Morphological Adaptations ❑ Wetland Plant Database ❑Technical Literature ❑ Other(ex lain): Hydrophvtic vegetation present? ❑ Yes�No Rationale/Kemarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? � Yes❑No Based on: SCS soil survey YES Recent Weather: Rain Field Observations: Primary Indicators: Secondary Indicators: Depth of inundation: None ❑ Inundated (2 or more required) Depth to free water in the pit: None ❑ Saturated in Upper 12" ❑Oxidation Around Live Roots in De th to saturated soil: None ❑Water h4arks Upper 12°' Check all that apply and explain below: ❑ Drifi Lines ❑Water-stained Leaves ❑ Recorded Hydrologic Data Available ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑Local Soil Survey Hydrology ❑ Stream Gauge Data ❑ Drainage Patterns in Data ❑ Aerial Photographs Wetlands ❑ FAC-Neutral Test of Vegetation ❑Other VVetland hydrology present? ❑Yes�No Rationale/Remarks: SP-A4 SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Quatama Loam, 3-7 %slopes Map Unit No.:37B Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fine-loamy,mixed,mesic Aquultic Haploxeralfs Drainage Class: moderately well drained ❑ Listed on Nationa] or Local Hydric Soils List � Has Hydric Soi] Inclusions Field observations confirm mapped type? �Yes � No If No,Explain: soil has been disturbed; gravelly Depth Horizon Matrix colors Mottle colors Mottle Abundance Texture,concretions, (inches) (Munsell moist) (Munsell moist) size and contrast structure,etc. 0-18 lOYR 3/3 gravelly silty clay Hydric Soil Indicators:(check all that apply) ❑Histosol ❑Matrix Chroma 5 2 with Distinct or Prominent Mottles in Upper 10" ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑Mn or Fe Concretions(>2 mm in top 3 inches) ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic or Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Reducing Soil Conditions(positive test) ❑Listed on Hydric Soils List,Matches Soil Profile ❑ Gleyed or Low Chroma(<_ 1)Matnx ❑Other(Explain): Hydric soils present? ❑ Yes�No Rationale/Remarks: Wetland Determinadon Hydrophytic vegetation present? ❑ Yes �No Is die sampling point within a wetland? ❑Yes �No Hydric soils present? ❑ Yes�No Wetland hydrology present? ❑Yes�No Rationale/Remarks P�� ROUTINE VVETLAND DETERNIINATION DATA FORnI (1987 Corps Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site:Gerbcr Legendary Blades Date: 7/17/06 Applicant/Owner: Fiskars Brands Inc. /Gerber Legendary Blades Div. County: Washington Investigator:J. Glabek City: Tigard State: OR S/"I'/R: NF: 1/4 ofNE I/4, 512,T2N, R1W Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site`? � Yes Q No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical)'? ❑Yes �No "I'ranseet ID: - Is the site a potential Problem Area'? ❑ Yes �No Plot Location: E end of wetland, S of Esplain: arking lot,N of crk. Plot IU: SY-AS VEGETATION (for strata, indicate T=tree; S=shrub/sa ling; H=herb; V=vine Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Raw%Cover Rel. %Cover Indicator pominant Lotus corr�iculatus H 45 same FAC � Phalaris mundii�acea H 4S FACW � Scir us micr-ocar us H "T OBL ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a }Iydrophytic Vegetation Indicators Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW or FAC: 100% Check all indicators that apply, and explain below: � >50%of Dominants OBL, FACW,or FAC ❑ Physiological or Reproductive Adaptations ❑ Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of ❑ Personal knowledge of regional plant prolonged inundation or saturation communities ❑ Morphological Adaptations ❑Wetland Plant Database ❑ Technical Literature ❑Other(explain): I�ydrophytic vegetation present? �Yes❑No Rationale/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the�rowing season?�Yes❑No Based on: SCS soil survey YES Recent Weather. Dry,sunny Field Observations: Primary Indicators: Secondary Indicators: Depth of inundation: None ❑ Inundated (2 or more required) Depth to free water in the pit: None � Saturated in Upper 12" ❑Oxidation Around Live Roots in De th to saturated soil: 10 ❑ Water Marks Upper 12" Check a11 that apply and explain below: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water-stained Leaves ❑ Recorded Hydrologic Data Available ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Local Soil Survey Hydrology ❑ Stream Gauge Data ❑ Drainage Patterns in Data ❑ Aerial Photographs Wetlands ❑FAC-Neutral Test of Vegetation ❑ Other Wetland hydrology present? �Yes Q No Rationale/Remarks: SP-AS SOILS Map Unit Name(Senes and Phase): Urban Land Map Unit No.:41 Taxonomy(Subgroup): NA Drainage Class: NA ❑ Listed on National or Local Hydric Soils l.ist ❑ Has Hydric Soil lnclusions Field observations confirm mapped type? � Yes ❑ No If No, Explain: Depth Ilorizon Matrix colors Mottle colors Mottle Abi�ndance Texture, concretions, (incl�es) (Munsell moist) (Munsell moist) size and conirast structure,etc. 0-4 lOYK 3/3, 7.5 YR 4/6 common,medium, clay ]oam IUYR 3/2 rominent 4-15+ IOYR 3/2 lOYR 3/6 common,mcdium, clay loam rominent Hydric Soil Indicators:(check all that apply) ❑ Histosol � Matrix Chroma<_ 2 with Distinct or Prominent Mottles in Upper ]0" ❑ I�istic Epipedon ❑ Mn or Fe Concretions (>2 mm in top 3 inches) ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ F�igh Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils ❑Aquic or Perayuic Nloisture Regime ❑Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑Reducing Soil Conditions(positive test) ❑Listed on }lydric Soils List,Matches Soil Profile ❑Gleyed or Low Chroma(<_ 1)Matrix ❑Other(Explain): Hydric soils present? � Yes Q No Rationale/Remarks: �'1'eUand Determination Hydrophytic vegetation present? �Yes �No Is the sampling point within a wetland? � Yes Q No Hydric soils present? � Yes❑No V4'etland hydrology present? � Yes❑No Rationale/Remarks P B S ROUTINE ��ETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FOR1�I (19&7 Corps Wetlands Dclineation Manual) Yroject/Site:Gerber I_egendary Blades Uate: 7l17/06 Applicant/Owner: Fiskars F3rands Inc. /Gerber Legendary Blades Div. CountV: Washington Investigator:J. Glabek City: Tigard State: OR S/T/R: NE 1/4 of NE 1/4, S 12, "1'2N,R l W llo Normal Circumstances exist on the site`? � Yes ❑ No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical)'? ❑ Yes�No "Tr�nsect ID: Is the site a potentia] Problem Area'? ❑ Yes �No Plot Locafion: E of E end of��etland, S Explain: �f parking lot, N of crk. Plot ID: SP-A6 VEGETATION (for strata, indicate T=tree; S=shn�b/sa ling; H=herb; V=vine Dominant Plant Species Stratum Raw% Cover Rel. % Cover Indicator pominant Lotus c:or��iculutu.s H 30 same FAC � Phalaris arundi��acea H 60 FACW � D ❑ ❑ O 0 ❑ 0 0 - o Hr'drophytic Vegetation Indicators Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 100% Check all indicators that apply, and explain below: � >50%of Dominants OBL, FACW,or FAC ❑ Physiological or Reproductive Adaptations ❑ V isual observation of plant species growing in areas of ❑Personal knowledge of regional plant prolonged inundation or saturation communities ❑ Morphological Adaptations ❑ Wetland P1ant Database ❑ Technical Literature ❑ Other(explain): Hydroph��tic vegetation present? � Yes❑No Rationale/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season?� Yes �No Based on: SCS soil survey YES Recent Weather: Dry,sunny Field Observations: Primary Indicators: Secondary Indicators: Depth of inundation: None ❑ Inundated (2 or more required) Depth to free water in the pit: None ❑ Saturated in Upper 12" ❑ Oxidation Around Live Roots in Depth to saturated soil: None ❑Water Marks Upper 12" Check all that apply and explain below: ❑ Drift Lines ❑Water-stained Leaves ❑ Recorded Hydrologic Data Available ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Local Soil Survey Hydrology ❑ Stream Gauge Data ❑ Drainage Patterns in Data ❑ Aerial Photographs Wetlands ❑ FAC-Neutral Test of Vegetation ❑ Other Wetland hydrology present? ❑Yes �No Rationale/Remarks: SP-A6 SOILS 1�1ap Unit Name(Series and Phase): Urban Land Map Unit No.:41 I�axonomy(Subgroup): NA Urainage Class: NA ❑ Listed on National or Local }lydric Soils List ❑ Has Hydric Soil lnclusions Field observations confinn mapped type'? � Yes Q No If No, Explain: Depth Horiron Matrix colors Mottle colors Mottle Abundance Texture, concretions, (inches) (Munsell moist) (Munsell moist) size and contrast stn�cture, ete:. 0-6 lOYR 3/3 loam G-I5+ lOYR 3/2 ]oam Hydric Soil lndicators:(check all that apply) ❑ Histosol ❑ Matnx Ctiroma <_2 with Distinct or Prominent Mottles in Upper 10'' ❑ �listic Epipedon ❑ Mn or Fe Concretions(>2 mm in top 3 inches) ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic or Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Reducing Soil Conditions(positive test) ❑ Listed on Hydric Soils List, Matches Soil Profile ❑ Gleyed or Low Chroma (<_ 1)Matrix ❑Other(Explain): Hydric soils present'? ❑ Yes �No Rationale/Remarks: �Vetland Determination Hydrophytic vegetation present'? �Yes❑No Is the sampling point�vithin a wetland'? ❑ Yes� No FIydric soils present? ❑ Yes �No Wetland hydrology present? ❑ Yes �No Rationale/Remarks P�� ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (1987 Corps Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site:Gerber 1_egendary Blades Date: 7!17/Ofi Applicant/O��ner: Fiskars I3rands Inc. /Gerber Legendary 131ades Div. Co�nty: Washington In��esti�ator:J. Glabek City: �figard Statc: OR S/'I'/R: NE 1/4 of NI; I/4, S 12, T2N,R 1 W Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? � Yes ❑ No Community IU: ls the site significantly disturbed (Atypical)'? ❑Yes � No Transect 1D: Js the site a potentiat Problem ,nrea'? ❑ Yes �No Plot I,oca�tion: F, end of wetland, S of Explain: arking lot, N of crk. Plot ID: 5P-A7 VEGETA'TION (for strata, indicate T=tree; S=shrub/sa lin �; H=herb; V=vine Dominant Plant Species Stratum Raw% Cover Rel. °/a Cover Indicatvr pominant Lotars c�orniculut�rs H 20 same FAC � Icn1•�i russ tii•ilh severa!Poa s . H 80 FAC � ❑ ❑ ❑ D O O O D �Iydrophytic Vegetation I�dicators Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or F�'1C: 100% Check all indicators that apply, and exp]ain below: �>50%of Doininants OBL, FACW,or FAC ❑ Physiological or Reproductive Adaptations ❑ V isual observation of plant species gro��ving in areas of ❑ Personal knowledge of regional plant prolonged inundation or saturation communities ❑ Morphological Adaptations ❑ Wetland Plant Database ❑Technical Literature ❑ Other(ex lain): Hydrophytic vegetation present? � Yes Q No Rationale/Remarks: The grass was mowed and very difficult to identify. There were several Poa species in the vicinity which were not mowed. HYDROLOGY Is it the gro�ving season?� Yes❑No Based on: SCS soil survey YES Recent Weather: Dry, sunny Field Observations: Primar,y Indicators: Secondary Indicators: Depth of inundation: None ❑ Inundated (2 or more required) Depth to free water in the pit: None ❑ Saturated in Upper 12" ❑Oxidation Around Live Roots in Depth to saturated soi1: None ❑Water Marks Upper 12" Check all that apply and explain below: ❑ Drift Lines ❑Water-stained Leaves ❑ Re�orded Hydrologic Data Available ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Local Soil Survey Hydrology ❑ Stream Gauge Data ❑ Drainage Patterns in Data ❑ Aerial Photographs Wetlands ❑FAC-Neutral Test of Vegetation ❑ Other I �'Vetland hydrology present'? ❑ Yes � No Rationale/Remarks: SP-A7 SOILS Map Unit Name(Series and Phase): Urban l.and Map Unit No.:41 Taxonomy (Subgroup): N�1 Draina�,e Class: NA ❑Lisicd on National or I.ocal }�ydric Soils List ❑ Has Hydric Soil Inclusions }�ield observations continn roapped type'? � Yes�No If No, E;xplain: Depih Horizon Matrix colors Motile colors Mottle Abundance 1�exture, coneretions, (inches) (Munscll moist) (Munsell moist) size and contrast structure, ete. 0-I 1 IOI�R 3/3 silty clay loam I 1-16+� IOYR 7/2, 7.SYR 4/6 common,medium, sand IOY'R 3/3 prominent Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ❑ Histosol ❑ Matrix Chroma <_2 with Distinct or Prominent Mottles in Upper 10�' ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Mn or Fe Concretions(>2 mm in top 3 inches) ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils ❑ Ac�uic or Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Reducing Soil Conditions(positive test) ❑ Listed on Hydric Soi]s List, Matches Soi1 Profile ❑Gle �ed or Lo�u Chroma (<_ 1) Matrix ❑ Other(Explain): llydric soils present'? ❑ Yes�No Rationale/Remarks: In the 10-16 f layer the lOYR 7/2 was sandy and white. Wedand Determination Hydrophytic vegetation present`? �Yes Q No Is the sampling point within a wetland? ❑ Yes �No Hydric soils present'? ❑Yes � No Wetland hydrology present? ❑Yes �No Rationale/Remarks P�� I20UTINE WETLAND DETERnTINATION DATA rORM (1987 Corps Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjecUSite:Gerber Legendary Blades Date: 7/17/Q6 Applicant/O�vner: Fiskars Brands lnc. l Gerber Legendary 131ades Div. County: Washington Investigator: J. Glabek City: Tigard State: OR S/T/R: NF: 1/4 of NE l/4, S]2,T2N, R 1 W � Do Normal Circuinsta�nces exist on the site'? � Yes 0 No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical)? ❑ Yes �No Transect ID: ]s the site a potential Problem Area'? ❑ Yes � No Plot Location: S end of wetland, S of crk. Explain: Plot ID: SP-A8 VEGETATION (for strata, indicate T=tree; S=shrub/sapling; H=herb; V=vine Dominant Plant Species Stratum Raw%Co��er Rel. %Cover Indicator pominant Phalaris cn-iu�dinucea H 80 same FACW � E irrsetun� an�ense H 5 FAC ❑ Holcus lana�irs H l5 FAC ❑ a 0 ❑ 0 ❑ D O O Hydrophytic Vegetation lndicators Percent of Uominant Species that are OBL, FACW or I=AC: 100% Check all indicators that apply,and explain below: �>50% of Dominants OBL, FACW,or FAC ❑ Physiological or Reproductive Adaptations ❑Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of ❑ Personal knowledge of regional plant prolonged inundation or saturation communities ❑Mo�phological Adaptations ❑ Wetland Plant Database ❑Technical Literature ❑ Other(ex lain): Hydrophytic vegetation present? � Yes 0 No Rationale/Remarks: NYDROLOGY Is it the growing season?�Yes ❑No Based on: SCS soi] survey YES Recent Weather: Dry, sunny Field Observations: Primary Indicators: Secondary Indicators: Depth of inundation: None ❑ Inundated (2 or more required) Depth to free water in the pit: None � Saturated in Upper 12" ❑ Oxidation Around Live Roots in Depth to saturated soil: 12 ❑ Water Marks Upper 12" Check all that apply and explain below: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water-stained Leaves ❑Recorded Hydrologic Data Available ❑ Sediment lleposits ❑ Local Soil Survey Hydrology ❑ Stream Gauge Data ❑ Drainage Patterns in Data ❑Aerial Photographs Wetlands ❑ FAC-Neutral Test of Vegetation ❑Other Wetland hydrology present? �Yes ❑ No Rationale/Remarks: SP-A8 SOILS Map Unit Name(Series and Phase): Urban Land N1ap Unit No.:41 Taxonomy (Subgroup): NA Drainage Class: NA ❑ Listed on National or Local Hydric Soils List ❑ flas Iiydric Soil Inclusions Field observations confirn� mapped type'?�Yes Q No If No, Explain: llepth i�orizon Matrix colors Mottle colors Mottle Abundance TexiLne, concretions, (inches) (Munsell moist) (Munsell tnoist) size and contrast structurc,etc. 0--1 lOYR 3/2 4-7 lOYR 3/2, lOYR 4/3 7-15 lOYR 3/2 7.SYR 3/4 many, fine, distinct oxidized root channels Nvdric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ❑Histosol � Matrix Chrorna 5 2 with llistinct or Yrominent Mottles in Upper 10'' ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Mn or Fe Concretions(>2 rnm in top 3 inches) ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils ❑Aquic or Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Oreanic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Reducing Soil Conditions(positive test) ❑ Listed on Hydric Soils List, Matches Soil Profile ❑Gle ed or Low C:hroma (<_ I) Matrix ❑ Other(Explain): Hydric soils present? � Yes 0 No Rationale/Remarks: Wetland Determination Hydrophytic vegetation present? � Yes ❑No Is the sampling point within a wetland'? � Yes ❑No Hydric soils present`? � Yes ❑No Wetland hydrology present? � Yes 0 No Rationale/Remarks P B S ROUTINE WETLAND DETERn]INA7'ION D,�T�1 FOR�t (1987 Corps Wetlands Uelineation Manual) ProjecUSite:Gerber Leeendary Blades Date: 7i 17i06 Applicant/Owner: Fiskars E3rands Inc_ /Gerbcr Legendary Blades lliv. County: Washington In��esti�ator: J. Glabek Cih•: �l igard State: OR S/'1'/R: NE I/4 of NE 1/4, S 12, T2N, R 1 W Do Norn�al Circumstances exist on the site'? � Yes❑ No Community ID: Is the site significanily disturbed(Atypical)`? ❑ Yes � No 'f'ransect ID: Is the site a poteniial Problem Area'? ❑ Yes � No Plot Location: S of S end of�setland Explain: Plot ID: SP-�19 VEGETf1'TION (for sirata, indicate T=1ree; S=shnab/sapling; H=herb; V—vine Dominant Plant Species SU�atum Raw%Co��er Rel. °io Cover Indicator poininant Phnlaris arzmdrnacea H 5 same FACW � E i�isetum arvense }1 T FAC ❑ Holcus lanatus H 10 FAC � Rubus discolor H ]0 FACU � Avei�a.catii•a }� 20 NL � hare soil irith cfead cut��•ass on top H 40 ❑ D ❑ O O - ----- � HVdrophytic Vegetation Indicators Percent of Uominant Species that arc OBl., FACW or FAC: 75% Check all indicators that apply, and explain belo�v: �»0%of Dominants OBL, FACW,or FAC ❑ Physiological or Reproductive Adaptations ❑ Visual obsen�ation of plant species growing in areas of ❑ Personal knowledge of regional plant prolonged inundation or saturation communities ❑ Morphologica] Adaptations ❑ Wetland Plant Daiabase ❑Technical Literature ❑ Other(ex lain): HVdrophvtic vegetation present'? � Yes Q No Rationale/Remarks: Did not include the bare soil and Avena sativa in the percent of dominant species calculation. HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season?� Yes ❑No Based on: SCS soil survey YES Recent Weather: Dry, sunn Field Observations: Primary Indicators: Secondary Indicators: Depth of inundation: None ❑ Inundated (2 or more required) Depth to free�vater in the pit: None ❑ Saturated in Upper 12" ❑ Oxidation Around Live Roots in De th to saturated soil: None ❑Water Marks Upper 12" Check all that apply and explain below: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water-stained Leaves ❑ Recorded Hydrologic Data Available ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Local Soi1 Survey Hydrology ❑ Stream Gauge Data ❑ Drainage Patterns in Data ❑Aerial Photographs Wetlands ❑ FAC-Neutral Test of Vegetation ❑Other VVetland hydrology present? ❑Yes�No Rationale/Remarks: SP-A9 SOILS Map Unit Name(Series and Phase): Urban Land Map Unit No.:41 Taxonomy(Subgroup): NA Drainage Class: NA ❑ Listed on National or I_ocal Hydric Soils 1_ist ❑ }las H_ydric Soil Inclusi<»�s Field observations confi��n mapped type?� Yes ❑ No If No, Fxpl��in: Depth Horizon Matrix colors Mottle colors Mottic Abundance I�exture,concretions, (inches) (Munsell moist) (Munsell m<�ist) size ancl contrast structure, etc. 0-3 lOYR 3/3 sand�� loam 3-7 lOYR 3/3 lOYR 4/6 fc�v, fine, distinct sandy loain H,ydric Soil lndicators: (check all that apply) ❑Histosol ❑ Matrix Chroma <_ 2 ��ith Uistinct or Prominent Mottles in Upper 10'� ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Mn or Fe Concretions (>2 mm in top 3 inches) ❑ Suifidic Odor ❑ High Organic Content in Surf�ace Layer of Sandy Soils ❑Aquic or Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑Or�anic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Reducing Soil Conditions(p�sitive test) ❑ Listed on llydric Soils List, Matches Soil Yrofile ❑Gleyed or Low Chroma(<_ 1) Matrix ❑Other{Explain): ��ydric soils present? ❑ Yes� No Rationale/Remarks: Could not dig deeper than 7 in due to rocky ground�vhich is most likely till. Wedand Determination Hydrophytic vegetation present'? ❑ Yes 0 No 1s the sampling point within a �vetland? ❑ Yes �No Hydric soils present? ❑ Yes �No Wetland hydrology present`? ❑ Yes�No Rationale/Remarks APPENDIX C Plant List and Wetland Indicator Status US Fish and Wildlife Service Plant Indicator Status (Rced 1988, Reed 1993) Indicator Status Definition Obligate Wetland (OBL) Occur almost always (estimated probability > 99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. Facultative Wetland (FACW) Usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67% -99%), but occasionally found in non-wetlands. Facultative(FAC) Equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (estimate probability 34% - 66%). Facultative Upland (FACU) Usually occur in non-wetlands, but occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability 1%-33%). Obligate Upland(UPL) May occur in wetlands in another region, but occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in non- wetlands in the region specif7ed. No Indicator Status(NI) Insufficient information exists to assign an indicator status. Not Listed(NL) Not on the National List in any region. �A plus sign(+)after the indicator status category means that the plant is more likely to be adapted to wet conditions than the category indicated. A minus sign (-) means the plant is Icss likely to be adapted to wet conditions [han the category indicated. Plant List for Gerber Le endarv Blades Scienti�c Name Common Name Indicator Status �lilrr.c ruhrci red al�icr I�f�C lo�cciuz�s �enicz�lutirs meadow foxtai] FACW+ rr�herratherirn� elutizrs tall oatgrass UPL ronnrs hordeaceirs soft brome UYL Calocedrars decu�-�-ens incense cedar NL Curex stiputu saw-beaked sedge FACW+ Cor►�lus cornuta var. caliJornica beaked hazelnut FACU Cratuegus rnonogvna English hawthorn FACU+ Cupressus x le}'lu�Tdii Leyland cypress NL Cytisus scopurius Scotch broom NL atrrus carrotu wild carrot NL zrisetum ar-ver�se common horsetail FAC Geruniarm clissectaun dissected geranium NL Geum macroph��lh�m large-leaved avens FACW- �cdcru heli.r English ivy NL Iolc�+s lu,zut�rs common velvet grass FAC • ocharis radicutu rough cat's ear FACU uniperus squumata ornamental juniper NL a sa�za conummis nipplewort NL ei�ranthemtnn viJgare ox eye daisy NL otus cor�ticuluttrs bird-foot trefoil FAC ult�s domesticu apple FACW halaris arzn�di�racea reed canary grass FACW lanta o lanceolata English plantain FAC ou alustris fowl bluegrass FAC ou trivialis rough bluegrass FACW seudotst� a menziesii Douglas-fir FACU Quercus garryarza Oregon white oak NL aninzculus re e�zs creeping buttercup FACW hamnus purshia�7a cascara FAC- ubus drscolor Himalayan blackberry FACU ulix lucidu ssp. lasiandra Pacific willow FACW+ ulix scouleriana Scouler's willow FAC cirpus microcarpus Small-fruit bulrush OBL enecio jacoboea tansy ragwort FACU Trifolium dirbrum suckling clover UPL Vulpia hromoides six weeks grass NI APPENDIX D Assess�nent of Wetland Function Capacity: Judgmental Method __—� _lssessmc�nt Sijmmar�� 1�'��rrn � �.. � , _ ' , , , ; ��te \:iin�•: r�e�r'�� "c'��-•i� ;�i��ts C ��uiit�: ;. 1 f:� -� t;urt. ��:��1� })\ � ylC.�i�� j'L��,.��4cir,-�rl.t n✓. ��:IjC" ✓� J �O.r. . �1-�':t c�t�`it��: �urrc�> \1.1�1�>Cl� ��t4I ��YI�'�- .j�A��., _ '�r._.,,1 � _ _ , , /, ��t.l�� '�ll��.f��{C:'�� ... ��i✓e- •�"G �.�aW- Lfti:J✓1Y� . . .. . . . . . . ' it n'..•��ni.iin�.ai;.�i,�,�,.•ul��i�.n.�.., ,.i...,..iic��.�i::.�t.�I:�.o-.h �- � t��11�1�i1C �t��11.13i1 � I��i�TC J'Ti��'lli � tltic:') ni 1}lc' i:l}>�� C�(��. :�� 'iS�l�'1- �i��lllllfi� ,ii"ti '!�''e;r;!i:li �)f� tlt}1 I?l;fl�!t''.lt,l�ll':1��\' l'l�lll�?llll' �\l�fl'� 11ti�i11 t�?ff�'f�'ilt Illil�fl�ill�_ ��( �U21illt�llS .lillj ''.:I�U�' Function ( :ip:�t•it� tirorc \ :�luc• �c�irc I l�inll�laf�lil��l> I i�t;iit��.i!�Stit�ll NUIII'ttUt1C rI-- Pr;<C,1! I lill� � I i[i3C�i� ��uc�nall . F.._. ___ T_ .... ... . . . ._.-... . � _� -�;�_7�C 1. .i�IC� '. •ii`tC i :1�1t'� _..—._—_— _--_ ... ..__.. ...._.___ . _ ._._.____.__'—_—_ 11��1ICr titura�t' c�: ��i'�;I� i � aZ � I - � ,� •i � � � �,, � --�,.______.-_�_. .- - • ' �i�fint�•r�t �i,�f�i1��,�ts��c� �� G �_r^---� r 1'h��,ph�,ru. 1Z�t�nti�,n ;, :, ; � ,,,.:. - --___ ,_ ___ -- ------- - - \itrukc�i IZ�iz;cFrai j � - - ---- - , �;�h.i r�rr: I I �.=. , Brrukm�l A nui ciclincJ.� i . _. � . �. _ ... . . __..;_._�— ---I----- .___. __. _—_. ---.__. .._ __ . _.._. _ . . . ._. _.. fh��rrn�,rci�u{atit�n �,� ! _ I !� h� t .._ ..._,.. . . . . . .. . . � . l�r�� l��llT��l - G-.oZ ,. - . _ _ _ __ ._:�-- — —�--- -- — — — — li�•iclrnt Fisli fi;�bit:�t Su��pc,rt � � ; i ,��;; :�ti<i�lrc�rnc>�iti Fi.}� Hahil.tt St�E��vrt -- O - - - — � ' `�' �� - -- __ ; � , In�c•rtc�t�ratc E l�tl�it.tt �tippt,t�t , �a � . � `�: ' -----�-- �>>nphil�ia❑ �'� Turtic E�1ah�tai � � ' ,�:,, ��,< , f;r�ri�in« ��aterhtrcl �upri,rt i Q --_ � .ti i _ -- -----—�'—!-- ._._ \�'�ntenn� tS'; �ti�=rat<;�ti• ��-- -- �'��t�tcrhircl Su <,r� �,a�� .., -- -- -_. _ --- Sc,nLY�irJ H�ih�t�st Support �.� --- ...__- -- -- ----------- _ ��_sz� _ _ _ - ----��-'_� - --_.___ ___ - - -- Su}�pnrt �.�i�C h:irac�cri,tir �'c��tl.�tic,ri U � �i,a�.� � ��•�-� �<� .-�ssess�Y�ent ��illlllll.il'V FOi'IIi (�i:i_�� ,��'t . In th�• E�re��:e�3in��tahf�, �.�er� Illl�t)�IERUI-_' ��•ur�•� li�r f=iirt�•tie,n (',i�,.,�it�, tr��>>i �ch�•cl. uiie� thcKrl�•irn�:-txi>ri! \lrtlx�d. �t.inJ.n�li�c�ltn ' hii�itc.t liin:��;�rin�.. tfiC 3�t'IiPCnic•-h;i��•c1 �lrf�ln�i ,I;iik�t�t��ii<<I L�"i�•��.t:ilir'rr�1 ° ��ih�')u�ILn��•nisil \1��ihc�.1!:\��rn�lix fil.' U(� �i�li �(`[l�ti�i'1'1�1C �ITC tt� fll�i�.?f'1C:��ti' fl:l\� �ti'�Il Illc�ii��,' ��'��i�(iC�{.' '�.iti Ii�> 1< tl�r �t��E�ui ,�(::s��rri ,: i n_>i.��u, �.�itl,irn; ,�r ri��.�ir n:uru' y'��l'�� `;� , , , 7f \C'ti,��('��.C,l�t. �tt7-�t 1[ 1�l.i`lllliCli�{41�I-I1:371'fll .C.i�( il.tl-C�l.11l[1:�. ':(:.1: ;rv_6�ds� i3 �lG1.[iCC� CO^T�j/�i�fC� Or. q � �Jls!?�`/. .ro+l L.��a�!� ._/: r„ 1 f)cscrihc t3ir ha.i> ti�rh,•�undxri�s �.vu u.rd t��drlin� ih�°:.iir�: �%� ,:�sr7ir' �o�/SC S a-� �,/G'2f/l�c.cJ� ��t_ �C:� J�Q v�'r•IJ .iw � .�7 �c. ��.: s- i��fs � � �� -- �= 'j `''` j J� _/ - f"�1�)C?f;ilc'. :1'�i�il'��l*�l. ��Il:3:i�U117�i1C�i15�'i+U 1118tjc:�C�li'II i�11711<llil]L'�+:i��tiiular ind!idlli�l:�. GIAi�ii:ji]Illi•:tit� ffti h��l'� fcE3k.E tn 1�l!� =�1ti ��Ill��C'IF1IhC[ilC 4� 1 c'�I ;?lU�{�'hc�t��: 1,,��3-�1�.SlllS t��I?f1C�Cl � :C::�illll��•:l.f� �tit_'i'� 11 R�'�.��-:iil"'.�. {f]�fO�jl��t'1ilL z {T1=11)� (lf�l��ltl�?118�, f)ll( V(�ll tlfc t:Tl�'c�Ul"�lt?�l{ tt� it�111��etC l�lt"��' Ill ntt�i°I- li� �?I-ir'�'It�t' a fi�11er r-ontext ti�r understandin� the a�se,smc:nt �r�,res_ l hlakr. �:�ur he.t r-t��r�;�tr n(irl.ih�r dnmur�nci��,t It�c•�lirrci .ourceS of�tiatcr inpiil. i�,tln•.ii�Juru:��:.i.h c�l the r.4n seasc,i�al E,�rinds�iurin�an averat!e vear --- -- —__._ ____..— �. • _ �--- ---- - ----- - ---, ' :�prill Octoher;l (c1i�) r\mrmber I- ll:u�•h?II(�retl � r-..- - _ _ f t:'hannel fl�,u °�, � � (in ;udin_� rnrrbaul. Ilnc�din�>� i � i - - �)�irl�inct run�,f1 tn� t i�t c.h.�nne)�j � �; -_.�_—_-.___ ._ �. Subsurta•.•e llc�� fi �r��uncf�,�at�r .�- ------- � � —- --- �„ C)i�c:;:t Ftrc..:i��ir.3tic»i , �� I ,-__ �, o ----- -----------'---- :�Cflfl'il:l� 1{'3ll'I IIII�UCI� , °," j _'____.__.__-.'____.__.'_—`'r. —I.�IL}tT I 5';llc-T pi�C�.rEt ! - ---- i i ___. _ . .... _.._ __. . ._ � .__.i T()r:1� �{1{100 )f1�1°n � 3. FEn�a•mucli<�1 tl�e;ite. is u�,lan�i�nctu,o„n:> °o 3. Lt�i�F ic��rdir�alrs u(lhc �itc.lt�otn GPS rcadin�.�r digitai inap- latitudi: _ ___ i� lc�n��IuJr \� (�thcr Cnmmrnts: f�() :�p��entlix I�_ .��ti��IllCllt ()f I"UIl�llc)Il C��p�lcity: J�ic�`�I71elllai ��1ctl�od t a�711�)�GiC i�%t' tti�E��l�'lll�' �yU3�11311\'t :1'.>;C`:;I1lClll� i�J tllllClll�[1 ��Il�� lt 14�U l!l�,�C• flui ;n �'c�il';E?�l'il' 1�1C ICFClCIIi:C-��:1��i({ �ltiti«tiI11tIlI� l�l:ll �1t,'�iFl N[] }�:3.'C lll_ - insir•��cti�ns: Iri �;kCll Ci�t1. iIl(Ill'11�1' LII;Y: ;i �hc.k�it:ul: it �ntir ,iic� I�,��k; muri� lil;�� tli� ��htsrl��tit C:1�?:!l'l�`,'., l�>13tjlllO]1 l�r iflt��Iillllllll'<t� l':1(1:1Ci1� i'i�ili�lll��[L ��1t11 t'1CC�� l ?llllllhtC t+il (fll' �l'�11'lfl!'. linc hrlc,;� thi, t:�hle_ ha,�d c,iE ��t,ur�r,rtall 1C11(liCti�l��(1 <�f th�° ;itc-'; ��:�j�,i�.it� tc, ;ti�,��rt thi• iUlll'lli�fL :�ElC3"[l:illli'��. I1)�TC�II� 11t Cfll'�}�131<il�.�. v(tU l':tfl �li�l�.:ll id �t:�rrl' 3�� :1�'�l I't��: hE I�I�1CI11�� ;l ]1L1117I)Cf !Il [�i� iCI14l'C l'i�IU11711 l�t l':I�EI Il��. C.'�.. i)�11llf]llllil� i�:l�)�11111'} -li�- , .�1 II115�hr;t c�a�,n�ii��1. :mcj tl�r�i ��tll]�til� l�it' 1�1�\I' �l'(�fC� lii �I I7l:tIlItCT �ff �l1Ui l}IUU�tIi_�. ��Ci�3i](1� �ll'Il;�llli)t, `l�il)C f'i)\�� fli�>CC (�1:fi1 [ri�l�l'� 1� �'i�U ht�lc\'t' iEl(>�� ]RcE7�Ctl��i'� li_� }I:t1l' '�CC<IiCT UIt�UC11iC�H1 ,i �lllll(ii!I). ��1Ct�)l'1 ha�:cil c�n matl�cm,�iir�il i,perati��ns c>r sr��,ihcr ��a� i�1��nt}i��siziri��_ b�� •ur�• t�.� �ir�f� �:,ur linal �C(H"C t��r fh� ttIl7CTl(Hl i�ll either i�t- hi��h c�l thc ti�lil�j�C� ��ll(�'�111C[1I �_][]l'� :!l EE�C t�t�ll(�tll. lhtiniti�»Z� c�l m.tm «i the tenn� arc;ir��i�1c.l in _1pi��ncli.� :�. �'LlI1Ct10I1 �,�i�l�lCIt� (.�L1C�L,?Ill�t�t�l� f�Stie��Il1CI1� C�t_�: «'ater �tora�e_and _I)elav_ -- fli�he.E E�'uncliur�in� �u��esfeJ -- - �Iiniriial I�uncliuni�i�- ticorr: t h��rr�;?r,rti:,n nf th�sit�:ihat is isiuFicl:i;ed �Ni�nc�,t thc :i,� i> iriu�;.i:it�d i:nl•.-.r:�.��nall•, t�nt��ra.c,nail��i; lar�c I hr�r:isc��nall�� Tt:r.itc i.a1�E:��.:r.�mpri�c�1�,itiv,•t �rrma�7cnt trtund-atcd p�irt<arr J:•finrd b� llnod rnark.<,n �.i:jlcr_�,r a hiLh�..a!rr t<�hic �a ith;�i:t �ur�a�� u:�ter. trr��::�ru:.lt�uh., �tuntr:i platU�. ;�n�{�:�t c3i,tin.•ti�.c a��i:17�31[G S�i plant sPccies. 11r�<t ri'�he<urta.��r.•ater in tl�c•cea�c>itall}- � VVater,�ddcd ti�>n; r;�in�°�.i n��empTi�°.��u�;kl� � inund.ncd zc,n�rrmi�i�� t�,r a li•.� d:n�c atirr trum�ll 01 tl�c�i�r_�is nutlrt.;,r�,crcnf�iti,,i3 ? C:i�FI IIUII C'.�t'1)1. ��{II 7liH �C?�U[ FTI(�!'C. � }}I3�i'it�rn �s�:��i':i1�C'��1'.'. ; Inik �:�1 llu�ri)tii.nk; ��ii itrrs:ucJ •tir��}•. � s�:t�rc'ity a�f t�c[?:tnit��l;tnt;I,t�+.� f �( �+� i � •�i'�Rt'r) --_ litil�:r.>r nn m:,lllinr i�f:;,�il> thr,+.ighr�ut the >C:ISiy7t3II��-IItUI7ij:31Ci1 2(U!l'. � -- `i[r ts lc�ralyd:,ry slc+�?c � �i[r i• fl<�t(1e�� .;t ��c+�,uii�lr�. �tr.i ! ��rc:.t'»Cc'ui nutlrf:'lrtrinc•I. Y'<�ur.tu�i��menta: Fun�tic�n Ca �ecity scc,re— . . en �ircle�,ne c,t the ti�llc,�L�in�,: ---- ---- --..._. _._�_ __ . � _ . _ ! 1.0 .8 .6 .4 [l _ --� Highest Lu�vest �6 FL1I1Ctlllll C ap��it�� (.luc�,,»>ei1t�:1� :��titi�ti�117�i1I ��t�): �ediment Stabilization and Phos horus Retention -------- , — - Ili��he.t Func�iunin, �u�;�c.IcJ � �linimal I i�iiiiiunin� _-1-_ �4'urc• � . _. _ ___ ± I�, : .., � :i n<<:t �l,stc� �� .r_. ; �I ,, � :. �. i en�.i :, �1,.I�i �t,i ,. .� I� li_ Ih.n,in iiii:un.l:ih��6Rfcm,�. �i��{.ii[it. j €�_I;n tumn��nt'+�,n.i i:��l.hircl_. :lu„u:rt,�,` �,' n. , i ' !��ti rr,�f th:rr��l�ciu��:�ut uh>tr.,i� i•��h� i l ,�F� ' ' ni !r €il� � <<,9,�min:�n[.i:h.lr.i:r ,�;�,,� I_ i;r.Ii..rf Ihr�c•.urtt.al r� ��: i� n :�I} m tlr. .� , � ne!!.�ii� � n::..tl ..in�I,• _r,i�.r1 .i:�•., .iII� .I:e�. .;�ri�l. rla�.,:l:rti Ir•ain.��r n.�h•.� 1 � •. rv,:ri�. �c�� f:�r ke', t�,:��il t�r,ur:< � ✓ I i�rl�. .l.nih..and��r+itir.tu,•�ILrr:j?'s:�•.; � \Il�.,r�ir.�rh .:I1,,r Ihr,uh.Ya[� in thr —-- �•..!iE�.. .� !.:r�� ,��n��t sh��_�n�und c��.cr m •r;l•,�n:�i irn� i. ,�=r.;�•�r�;�I.d th� >� � �nai i.�n�. ��r� htllr.�,il is har�. � .__ __. _ _ - -_ .__ -- _--- ----- _ -- ♦f�+lt,��.t ,kk !>an.l pu�l.1��at�'ptr �tF�,�c�J - �\h:3.�r.s ��, I.:.�r .�h.rn;.�t:u! tainc�, � ��i� � :�rll-;i31cr.F�rt�r.1�.+�th herh:��ruu•�c•�r�aU��;t �r:�i _ _ _�uh.u:�t��}::=�r�i:t rt hrrr rr.��ul�+�ur�i�n ♦uh.n::t�,tEu„�:_�}n�ur th: .r.tur :•t.'h::•.� J t �al,rr��:.�.urj:�:ad�c�::im��a:nc�n.r�c3�.,n�.l:t. t'i�rlltichit'1: 1'i�i�:ltt�tlt'c�f,�r��tLrn�s;e.:ihj<<tr,i I �J� � �i .i,ki;i,� Ic�i im_ `o<<i.lcni.c�t ; t��.�ro�+�•�ur.n.c�..��:�tir i (l ��.cin 1 >.in�� i 1 .�:;.. .n�•i��n�a.it':unthr.nr Ir�rlin�� { �irn.��. .-��d�n.� �?��..r ;r.ur.� Irr��si��tt m;r. F,r{�rr�ctit �,ti�th:t:lhr�ti: �'' ( :ril�ntrn[nr.irl,:�nt hcr•�.�t :,t!1r: pl:�ri.. \l- � 1:fi:��Er ha<c��inple±c — � fh� �ih.irat� �, u�titc r n . �l�t .ti iiL•n _ __._.-, nu.� i,y�.Lra�,h�:ihunui��rl�s.puJJlr�.�u:.i nc�•uccafnl� micn,tc,�.,��r:�ph. n:�hun��zi� �'t, r�� j ��c�U! Ilt(��llil'lif�: ----- I unr�,;,r, C ;�E��it� ;��,rr - p.� . �>r cir�i��,ne �,t the t��ll<,n in� _ --------- -.._ 1.0 .R .6 � .2 II _ Hi�;hest l.e��;�e.t l�un�tic�i� ��'apaciiti� (.Iud�111�.�nta1 A��e��1l�ent c�f): Nih•o��n 1Zemo��al ; — --_ - — - _ IIlis;lic�t Functiooin� i Surge�tcd �linimal Fun�tiouin�; i ; _ Scorc. ` �� t. Pr�,.«•.i t�iztt as.�-.;mg thi.runrti��n rnl+. �1 ml�ttlin ,�ti3 ur othcr fi:i,urr,thai it�d�u3t��,x�s�eti.irli�:il, :n . ,��I� �cc3i�nent:<ur f�,und in at lea.;t r��rt of lhe srtc. 3� h x�:�r� �.c:..a:<i�nrd t<,11`a�rr�t��gr i.cnt crr�a , a�•i��ncrd i�;�1:atrr S[orecr,\ t 1)�I:� turrcii�m i inund,�tion i.ic�ng. ticyur�u. L -la� funrt�nn fu.rtcr lccrlc harrh f)u�tuatrl � C\lsil�l\cJ; � .. _ ..._. .._. '_._ ] _._ ..� St�fTi��I]It91 C N�:ilif 0��3C11f f11Utl R'I7731115 '/ �U?Jr}3C�U'iltCf O7 J3Illf8IIC�f1:C!Ildlfl�'.C:li- Y �' � rci:n un�i or�uarl� s��,and�,di:per:r�i��rucmd r<und lt�Cil�C�711) I�lKk�1I7L il.cur.,rhr surfa:c thr srte wch ttr�l uatrr fl��ti pttlh�;�nd re�idrnir � ��ater i,�c�ncrntrated in.�nr part��fthu sit;.r.e.. i time� tre]i�ne. thannr)��r�x,n<i.:�ud d��s,sx,t rri3�ain 1�>r lon".� _�.. 5��l nucr��hial pio��tisrs are lattl� maturc. �Si�i]naicrohial procc:c,r .ur n��t��rtl- :�.��,.lhli >u¢gr.:cd hti ,ihun�3ance,�f�Ira� ile�ilr�ped a.pi,. thl� :��ti�.Ird ht 3:ii1:t�1�.3cad f +s<,.�c1 thu�k:�i�d rx�cnci�i•su�E vr�anic l.ivrr. ��ord. Ihirk .�,tl n�guni� I:i�et.and�,r l:uir- I nitd rn.�m iarrr diamcter nees diamrtcr tr��c�: _ —�-_.�_._ , ;�1 , IIt�IIf'�I I'Iiltl'111111117�„ ----�--- r tillr�;l'Sll'(I �lirtiina! Funi•liunim� �: _I i tirure: _ �uh.Fraii� f�a�r nrti:•r i•rrn rr;i�nt��iitr�i ;�r `uh�n.tt�< Ihri�u,�;��ut thr rntirr -i�•:h._<< , �.,�r.�:�r<uh�r,;��.i h,. �n;�iu,.t�� n.��:;_,.jt.,�n_ r�.:inti•. ^r,•n *..�c•nt, i:*«i.�r 'h_•r.;,,, .:,!-irtt... ��i l.�.�Eu�:� \,�t.�idrncr�-�t��r�,�ri :n••i��n t.�c� .�ipatu��i�.c•1:::r..:t3�.-ri. - ic .chn� ::itlun[ht.i1c \onc nt�ihr��t��•.c,i� c„n,utictr.l in>muplan.l. -- --------_ _ _ _--- -.�_._ _ ; ��t"•?��i I�?C VIC�l.l��}t11F7��'\ ��n�.l ��f I�tt'Litr}�:Iti t��+tfc��i�t't':i��i' ,. n�:.�,�i:��,c�cr�iE�ii. rhi�mrr:s��l.<. E�u�1�ilc...t. :� n:�,r��i��?��_s,�E,in �n��hui;in��,.l,..pu�i�i.,.itr ) ---iitr ;•hurn�ct:�n�;;i:tlh �a h:cnnia!!� `iti•h:�� rr.�i h�rn hurncd ir. r�crnt �.-:.tr- `,-<<t3r .[ii�i��tt�r3t�: I lltl�11u11 ( �1�?:lC11�',l:(.!f't' U ��i'l;lf'C1C I�IIC t�� f�ll' tV��111L': __ - --"- _ ---.. __..____ '.. _ ---------- _---- - _------__-- L(1 .8 .6 .� .2 , I) H i�,he�t l.c,��;t Tunctic_>n Ca�iac:it�� (,1uci��l�eni�31 :-'�sse��mel�l ��f�): Primarv Production — _ - --T- - _ __ _-------- fli�hi•c! I•ur3ctioniii� tiu�;�;r.lctl �lini�n;+l Functinnin'T ticc�re: ' ✓ 111�,I Ifia� �ilc• h,r,•.,i,ri:lar �,lant�:in�i�,r '�tuch��1 th.• .itc is dr�c�i�i��1�a�,u!;ir E�lan[- ; •.a:�i�•r �.ti i�ii:ilear .inJ��r alc:�r. . ------- - ._ _,._ -- _..•.. ----- --� t �:�rirr, ��CF�lant h,rm.i.�,r�•.rnt �n:��k,u� �11 h.+tr�rr �lani� :�rr pr ,rnl :�rr:na;nf� ,-�1 a r;�u,:! pt:�p�,�lirst�Itrrc>. �hnih�. and Ei��r;,,�:r�1 ;�n,�lr t��rn� �trrr. �hiuh..:�i h.r},.j s i.•,�,li-�fi.s�tbuR•d thr��u�h.,u�tt�c �ztr � r--.._. --- _-_ .___...__�- ___-•--�- ----- ; ��n�r•h,il)vu ( ± it�,utt:�rr�+�trr rrntaim fhc.it� i.rntir.l� �ir•. �lwine niucl:��1 thr •:�as ruuttcj i•r tiG:iii� �n. :�nJ in;un�n�c'� is vr,ir. ' - - �1��r.�d:erc�un.1 thc:it�.�.�;., Enany puddl�, � . �uh.tratr,tia�r r.�.rn c�rn rc��vuc�ur�d cv S�ih�tr:,tr:�hn�u�hc�u� th�•rntur�iac Iz.,:c• ,�[h•:-r,�i,r.�i;��r,.ir,f��i�,mFarlc�m_rs:a�:itirn. � � rr:rnti� hcctt r��ttnuri•c:��r i,thrr�i�.;•ub�r.�[r:i :�r l:�.rlfn:t ti<�rsi�+,rnic r�f.r��;r rt.+;�;�n r��..,,t3ipa.F;.�n.�s.s•�.in�v:. �,rE�t�liri�� tir.rrr � •.�:ittiin thc<it�. rrn.ti1n ma: hr c�i�Ec3tt�.�ithin the .it�. � — --._._ _ .... .__- I h.•�tr's ivntnbeitm� uatrr�hcd crntainc 1 hr �itr��r�mmhuun� �..�trr>hc:7 i�aln�c�.t � nn��I.md.p;��rd ;izr�acr_huildine�.�+r lai�ns cnnrih: cr��l:md.�S,i�rd .urt.ii c•.;>u�i�iinc.. antl ,.�,:�i:�l1t ;ir;hr��;ir?:;i��.��,( t��Ihc<��c. l�u»s �.;jirri:I1�. tl�c f�:irt. ,l��.r.t t��tlir ��t; l�c�ur .1�3�1��Ill�'[]1�: f un�tiutt C ;i?.�citv ;�urc , ur rircle c�ne c�t th� ti>11��in�,�: --i– = --.�_��_�-- ___ ____. 1.0 .8 .6 .�3 .�1. fl H i Khest Lo«�est �ti }=un�ti��n C�apacity {Jud`�Illt°Iltal ;`��se��ient c�i�>: "l�hermore�ut�ti�n -- --_ ___ . _ . . _ i lii�hcct Fiincti�iniur ��!p;c+ted ; �linim:il Functiu��in�; I ��•°f1•: 1 - _._.. _ _j \ni� � i wn.� ��r� h,�c��I i��• :�. .. .�l� r 1� t�,r ii� :inc y,tc.:�:•.ch,:n rar,,�t :fi� -i�. i� F�r�n:.:rrr.; , :nun.l it_:? — ; .in�1.��-�n. i� , `+ti •iitia�c• ,�.�tri �?u u._• .un:�*r:r t;�c zharr�.a�atrn c��dt�< _ ___._—� � � ,�i7rc t:�trt tat��t:'i• ;Y tlllll[It- Iti �.7:i��CC' � j �\�,11C �� Fl�'UJICt 1>�fl�tij�� ;�� C��I,iI:��ll.�l i � ' h� .� �I��.r�t trrc'i,�n, �� r,� F�.�. tuE�� _�:tj�h'.'- � h� ��r.tp'.n..it,cf all,+I Iht u:iir� i.•h:�ll�+�.r3 t��:in . 'tn 1u�trlt �urivti�r _ _ _ . __ . .-- - - - 11int,•t thi•�nttr� ,i?r �,n->>':• ��t .t.,i.r � �.:�, li�rl. ��t i}�� .:i��„nta�it• ;��i rru:t�:� i ' . ' � .3;�;�ct tl�,ir:h it. _ ,k:�acr �:nd r r:r�rr i:�:�r��cr th:�n:i 'c�,� n��.h��. l ��t:r lucl�me��l,: Fun�tic,n (-'a��it�• �cc�rr C?.,� - vr t•ircic�,nc c,t t)�r f��ll��,�in�: - - ___ --- ------- - __ -- - 1.{1 .8 .6 .-3 '� tl ��I`�})C jf �.1�1'.�i,t Functi��n C�apacit�° (.��td�i»��tal .a��e��nic�lt c�f): Rcsidcnt Fish Hahitat Su port Ili�hest I�unctin3�in� �n�;�;cstcd �tinim:�l 1•imc�ionin� - - ticurc: . _ _ . .._-- - - ---- -�— --- . \rNC l'ric� iunih„ta-icr, I ; .. �, rcl i+niti tf)�ati� t iiii-�i;r i±(!eitn:t��rt;tl� ni+tn�l:ilr�i ,�n:.i�iic• •i.,h.?::�. :� Kf�.�;�t;�' hr:��c�un.'in_�. . . I'�rn�anrnt��:�trr;,��rn.nc.:�au thr<itr Prnn.�r�nt�aatcr is�.cr. lintitc�i i.;��nnrrtrtl�:,nl•;fTn�•1�';ti�tlli a•�1��t:i1t'i! I �h;.i;r,el, _ \�•ti�;txEst� n�11 .�,cii�.:u� :�h;r�ti '�c�it-n:iti',r�p�r�r*dninusatc Ihc•t��iJci:1 `�,tt : c.jmE•r�r,ent. :r�th�.�asth:t�ntr n:itt�.e,:nr Girr�ri+i �}iallr-•.� ,�:�tc�arra�ind{�n��r�rti.a�;�1 ch�� I � If�rc,cnt. ;h;,r�•line.a:c .�e��i• :ii�,�,��;n�, ,u:� ih:it i� n�un�l�nrJ��n[v.�.u,,naEl�:i,,:f i i >har}�It�int��.�atcr titr��per than h ti.. �,ith li�tic nr �ulliriitti c'VC�ni :�n�1 cf��isl�f�' Ic�zu�?pc�rt � � m��rasun:+l zcnr hr:nt prc.rnt <��n�.�nin_�h� m��<t ;E,rric>. anc i cu3);x,rt, hiu Er ! ; _ , �Jc•n,iti.>nf ayuat�c imertrhra�c�� i (�i�l�T`I:![�II;iUC ��:Illl± 1�,�.. hr>uldrr�. � ,. �4"hcrc��atcr i. �'fcG�nl ��3�u(l:li�\. ��i�\:t C�1:l1 ��Il:.�n�;inc.tr��r� <ier�� :ite� sE.nt;,rt� 1 thal i�>ulJ �heher f3.h trt,m prcdatt.m ts scarcr r�r �tir��id�s�r:jr r�,und sh�h�°r fr�m�prtdati��n i, l�rl.ins� :�hunclani ---______---.__. ._ . ._____._.____._ -- H:ur� :;u:s4�t} Ir>{�r.talh•il��,�,hrd \1 atcr �: hea�il. cnntaminatr.i aitlt ; ��i�rii)is e«r1lrrit pullutant..a��i i�r cx��riencc�.cerer�•and � - -�±ml��ntird oxti_�cn drficits - --- __._�....._ .._...._ , l'r�ur.lud�►z��nt�: ----- ---_.. F�mcti�,n ('��,acity srnrc = . ur ciri:Jc�?ne i�f�thr i�,11c��in� : - _.�. -=--- - --- __ __ . 1.0 .S .6 .4 .Z 0 ; Hi�hest I o�tirest �i 9 I-'tlI1l:�1C)Il �'��p��citti� (.iud��il�et�tal :'��scssi»�,'Ill l)t): �n��drr�mo��s Fish �I�hitat �� or•t - ___---- _--,--��--_ _— _ - -- _ _ _ _-- . ; fli�tic�t Funcliunin� ' tiu;�rc,tccl ! \linini:�l i-unctiunin;; j �cori�_ j --� --+ �otc P:t��c��1 �eit�ii:s�•c>�:in:� t'tti> fun�li��i�imi� it��art��1 Ilti•>t[•.' i�:i��:�•�ihi� I��;ui:iJ�,�nu�u� Ii,h�luii�r,r�.,.;r.,.�r,;cl I ;t iml�tic ri - __ __._. __ . - - I � uJ �attir� �, il ir;t� tL�. •�i. .i�a��.. :� � I ��etcr..�,il: int� th::.�i� � n�..,� t-i•,;i:3 i ht ,.,9 . :st 4. ,�t iLt i�h:� .�n'.� �un,��n.rYi.<<�ii � i,.�nl,�•,r tl�n�u�•h:s �.�:.'.� i�:,.t� �n�tir:r�lr;n, utL � F11�'�:t�fl � � _' � � _"' _.___—____"__' I:, .��1�•.�,�ir„��:ii.�i�: :i, :fi: .ir. !;,r i�i�•t, � ; ti�,�urt;icc�.tatr: rciti.�is:, �n I.`�t•;�t� I•.�r iz;�,r�. th;:i;:� 1r�a .:s�,, � , Ih:m :� t.•,ti �3a'.: -- - - - T --- - � _ _ _ ._ _.__.__ :��}I] 11:Ii7li friEl��)t i.ti ltl i�IAi f�Z'� Itt��pl i ./ �UII-fl IIIEC fi fl�Plill�riC.�c.f211�1a1i .. ..---- --�_� .__._. . y -- �.ih.tr:uc..tni.ihir fr�r�p.i,tnu�.�r !r��I�nL ✓`u�,•u,itts.i��t,�hlt t�.�i �ra•,inn�. ��r I,t�l�n� :trc�z.•.•�t•i�.�•h ;,rr.:rt1 ::r� � .:.�,� .�� ,ih.rnl -`- ' � _. _._ __ -- ----- _- _-_, t. �a;r i:i.�Ui�is,.'{�I;i:t[-. L . 1�;�t:l�li^.� ,/t . ,rr i4i:�t t�rr,i.ir:.hs it,� �r�,rt.:i;i:nt, :�n�i i��\i•I'.ti�tt�i�tc'ttc'c'..ilc'i�>1lJtc'r .��h. P[�.1 til;ct i'��1:n,�c-< i�. .r:�r:�. ,�r iarkiiic ti,��rn:ili ��:iu., (t'�ir �f�".S�jl'�a}tl'�±i�; iT.��l)1�UI'S"�f)l� :1:1��7':i�:lli`f: i� � � �Ili t+htst.cl;int s! Ira�i in �hi �r,i��is:J n nc ' . _. _ . _- --- ---� -- ____.__. . __. _- ___ . \'�;it� i�u,il:t� I� �F�rii ilh .f�,.��ltir:i n��een1 �--- 1�;ik� i> hra�ii� :;�rsl.mnnatrJ 1�itl� . �---- ��: .;rilri?I � F��Ihii;�i;i,.:ircl��tc•�}�rttc•nir�• �c�:•ir;��ul � E•;„},m:�c�1,��urq�lrti:�i. �LIII?I?:4-'2l/pi Icll:;'l';.'.tSUfi I:l;l`.:(t.,".'�:�'it�'i �, ( til:I?lI1:lTl:Il:l iC':I)(�'[I:IiU�i IT7.1\IIZ�.:'.��.-.'1��. �. . � h:1�.�1L-�L� �I<�7 � . '___,�-:!13'.1l< �il:l:l� L• ..il:i�fC�iTlt'U� 11��': t.,tt�,;.3,�r.ltnr�, ran_�..•1 i ,: f . . . ... ._ -. . . . ...._. _ ..'. _'.' " _."__L._...."'_._ _-__..__ 5 i�ll��l�l��'1771'll!>: �'Uf1�I1��il �.�a��.i�tl� �ii>re n _ �>r�ircl�• unr ut th� t��\\'lf]L': ---=------__ ___�S.l.�.__ _------- _ ---- _ --- ' _. l.n .g .6 .� .� �0 H i;�hest Lo��.t . _ _ _ . F'UI1C'tl()Il C'apacit�� (Jlicj`?I11CIlt�il .�1ti�t�ti[11C11� (lf�: Imertebrate Hahitat Su �rt , P�----------- ----- , � fli;;hc�I Hunctiunint� 1u�rc�ted i �linimat Ftuietinnin� ! ' Scure: � � .`urta�r ,�aier i;Pcrn�anclit�,r i�e rh tiurf.i�e��tcr i.prr<cnt �Sniti hnct). ifti .�t«t � j pc>>ia:mrnt. :1':ll<il]��t thr .+.it:r i�>hallt��r�r r�r nc+t .�t a!1 ISF site��,t.�k na:ul, .ill rt ,hc� +�r.iri - � tt�asi ' frr.�f:i;�n,� t1a�-�rE?ti�r:�brr' rcrnain�:��c•p�r tltun h ti.:ur�n� 11a: Sc��t�n�t+e� ; - - _.---- -.___ ._ .____._ _ . . �t ,.:er ie;E,e�ia(1� ayua€ir plant�. unnil} ( �,r Iayu:�u�rl:int,. �;e+:,�3� dchn...i tfiai i dcMi�l l}st su�pt,rt�slgac and pre�ideti shcltcr c�,ul.1�u�F��rt algar�tnd prn�i�le sheJtri fi�>r�i � tri�3t��u��rnl�;+n�J prrdatur� is:+huitJanl in�S��th :urrcntc an�!E�n:dstor: i.Ea�:k�m� � the-:e�i•on<il.irr�1 ptnr�anrnt z,>»c __._.._..._._ . _..._..,_ _.._------ i F'lant tc�rm• i,nd ;pet��r�i�rr hichl� �lnrr.r �r)nl�•c�ar plant fi,mi is yiresr�it.anc!plan[ �i�c•s nchnrs,ts.cn•l��u• t'r_=rtati�m i�.crll inter.�cr,ed�citli�„c,l. � _ \'�ie[a[�on and pcK}k Iif:�ny1 arr ir.' �e�+aratc ; are^a:,,r zones —�_ _._ _ . __�_..� —_._., ,,_ , - - tit':l(Ci C�tl:�lit} (c�pcxiall� dzs.rl�rd c�x_.�cn) 1 ��'atcr i<hc:a�il� :i�ntaminated u itl; is rtircll�nt ; �c�Ilutants.�nd�nr rsperience�sc��err ari�i . -- _f � prnfnnirct��xt��rr�iiriirit• c){"� — __ _. -- - -- — —� fli�;hctit Functiuni�i; tiu�rrsted �tittim»I Funcliunin!� ticnrc: till})�lfSlC>fl:ltq ilc:�.2f hCC:11C�:�171i+U7:'��i�l' . . tiUh>ITJI�?- l�;l�-. 1;'�A�l!1 I�ii CII!;fC •t['.'..Il;i�: . i�fflCftil-t>C�C;fi�C�."It'�i I��C�Ill�3�ll��h. C\i;l\�:ftb?R. I"iC�'.li�Y h�r.;I Tt'C��IilirllC:'ij t�l��}I�2C7'�t l�t'�ll��(f'::IC�� ; . . C�f�l'�'l'�It15' ht`:�''.1l�Clll!•:�1:1•�t't:- :�f��?(-�17 . [c11c1171(��lC1L`f1.cSC;1`.:lili�fl.UOti�C'III,'. t`:'l�lt�l[� j �.w�rhm thi,::itr .5:nc•ri,n��lt c�,tt<Iructril 1tc�t�� u��l:,r.�l j - -- _ - :-_ __ - - - 1UCTi�U:ltjllt� �JfN�.c.i��i i��:1Cllfl[�3J,L't' � � �lll'1"1:UI?I�ISIi �.lf1t��(;t�lt'�'tilll:il717,If�•.tl'I�:I;L�� —' _3.r�u�r��f•,;rtla:�ils. :iic(tidm� ,,�i�i� v,ith:i � �.�� )�,,n:1< . idt�lrrrnt �.�:,tt•r rr�intr tlr,n:th�:�•:r.�rd:itr. � • yr::i,:s�;,l•:1.�r:`.iin�.�..n.�i,•,�ll nti�..11i.en��.•ur_�.c;r.,n�rr�,��,h:r.�.r�:at•:.�f!hr�.r:h:n.�.1�•ir.li.. ��i:�.�1:-'a.�,t'ecU;m�i��I<nr.;F tl ��r �:rt:�r.:m�l:,�n:.•:.�II��lFil i --- :ucmr:.. .^,ilme,\ .L.:n.��.t.,�ih t:-r:�..:.nrut,n,,.:�.�th�s..�:,.,n:ill}.inu••:1,�i:.i:. � 'fl,i-I•�,,:a.�i rn Il::t1.3s:d I.ir:un��r�i�•,i .I:��.r.� . �-il: i-I.i�eci�9:iti:rl�,�t.;;�nliil��.:hr,,��..:�t:��:;cJi ;,:,,��I-��-��,^-�:.ur:,� r�t.•-.>r::mi:n,i�•pr.�r:��,l'ut ,.�n.�cr.�n:m:r ,hu;-ni��..1. ��u.Gllr>.rtc i j ;r',,rn..; .. „ul{.1.h:e:nc6..u�d.�t,•rc r. ocu�.r�rd I;« +c:ucr.I�'a:��e � ��Ui�U(j'.STf1C'fliti: �-un��ti��n (_'a��:�c�t� .cnrc _ p• ,�._• <�r ciri•l� ��ni-c�t thc #i�llrn�in��: ,—_ _. –_..._ __ __ -- - ---- - --1----- _ i 1.0 .K .6 .� � Q �___ Ili�:hest _ Lotaest }'L111CI1t�t1 �'t��?�1l;llV (.1tll��'ll1C'llt�� f�titi�Stiil1t�Ilt Ot�: f��hibi�in_& Turtic Habitat -. - ---- _ __ , � Iii�l��•�t Huuctioniur S�i�;�,;c.li�d �[inim:il F'uncliunin� 1 � tic�rc: I 1':rn:anrn[�,�.it�r t.ah.�nt.l,iu :halli�� -- ��itr n��,er C:�pI3lt1�:u Ja�c �.�,�� _ __� f su�fa��5�atrr tltat �rFt,nsi>c�.trr3siti.�4�ant�� i)7Z i suhmrrtrd li��r-�trn3»ir�i Lrrb;` is e�tcnci•.r. �ite is c�urrl� �ur1;:��r ,�:�n r,•,ehi�h riEl7cr and re�rtir: �rr� �r:��jual'v::uring thr mrnthx i<;?nr:cr t3ui�cr.�tr� �ritn::ill�, li..:.. nc�scas<�na; .�t lanuan A1ay.'(i.�:.. durin�tfus �rnod. zi�nr�•prr�ent►.�`r Ih} fluctuatc.t�,c,mu�h �rn�ie tiirr�°are at 1ea�t :(�da•�s.tt;riF ��atcr lc�+.c�lc ar� [h<m :' inihe;durin_* al1 !0-da� prrtocis.��r Irl is ;tahle�,r hai�c a �rrttiai tluisu,�ti��n��t ' �1c•��id<�fam•cnu��4cnt hr�b.ih��t arr parth- in�Lr,i. suhmcr��rd during thr.pnnetiine.;,r�.d) 11onc [)R: tastrr il�an� in.hr. tir�?�,nd durin�t thc crntirc I'zrm��ne�tt•,�.atLr i;c�tr�:•��c and � �pnn�tririr.r�.r:}��l��ie in the site i�r lci is tno�il� :.nnt:jins tal:eb�inJ:erit undrru;,rcr��xer(aquati� € � �iec°E•er shan-l0 i�ichc�and i,horJ�Fed by:� � plants,lu�;,hui�lder�,c��e:rha�igin�trce._�lerp ; �lti��reline u�ith a�rry�,tcrp�Ic��r . ��atrr spt,ts.etc.)tliat pm�idr•�ficl�rr Irc�i�� prr.datiun.�r3d(bj pani;; -ubtnr�;_c�l tine- stemme�3 h�rh.� _...� ___ ____ . __ F3ulllrogs and c�thcr nt�n-n,��i��prc�ators Rullfi-s�g�and othcr nun-n.itnr p+c�Jt�t��t'�are arc ab.�nt ahunclant lf�urf�n:e��z�tcr etrr��h�rr iri thc si�r is�`� --- li.urfacr��•alrr r.rn•��herr iti tlx<ite i� �l.y�vi«�cturin��}�rin�;timr. thrrr arr.+1 Ir:i�t ?Ii tlo��u��Junne sprin�tianr.d��rc�are nerer murc day<��hcn cutrint�elix�tie�are�In�ti (• 4 Ihan �Q day.��13�n currcnt��ele�citir�arr.lin+ (--{ in.h�y>rrc+ndl i�t�hz� sccc,nd} —__.,..._-^ --__., . ---- ---_._ � I}1C1'C t�l'X[Ctltil\'(and�-ari«3•.��uodti ✓ Thcrc is no.s��o:ty dc:hris in the.u:�s�nal ' --- . ; del�ris in thc�ess�nal zoair zonr ��! — — _ -- --- -- __ _ _ lii��hcti1 H�unriiunin��, tiu��e.tcd � �lini�n:il Fiu�rtiunin�; ticnrc- F:i�hrr •.c•:-'cr,�t��i�:ind,��1�orr�i�•ll- f ��tat�cm an;9 E�,.,nl:�rr m.c•E�ar.:�tr:i��;�,�,t �ntrr��,�c•cJ�lurii:�� hic}i�.:a!r= I�•��=..�:�r:t�t�: ! ' sfir<�t.clurin�t hi�tL �satrr Iccrl.:�nd.��r. .�,;�;�c1� �c, .t �i•��i�tic�;i h icicr�ne th� I.:r.�i r�n�,i. :� •�ui!tu n t� rdccine :lic l.u�ri ��•I.n l��Ur�j i I �t�:�..�(.�� lih til�t t�t]l}1[�; ti�>fl�t i tli� � ' Itl�i.SI � �-fl�EItIY�ltL`.l�?:[1(: ��1�l�+li'-E�i��'l:l��l'."l� . ; �iicr+,t<,Eu��ispi.•, i,yuur �.a�,�d. � ��,��il:si t�,:ilt��•.�, m.un F�icc4�llc. h� t,.�rnzti:�• humn�ock..ri� 1 ,—_ __ ___. _ . _ __ _ 4sii�.�f 1� ha=k:n� �itr• 1�>s t�uY1�:and�al];n� �I h�rc ��: rn,ha;kin,� .itrs ��r turtlr.;�r ' i ;st�.s 1Vf f�i�, �. F7Ci �l 'scl;t :•�11tt7L' �iti �iFY ti;, .� _ _. ._._ . .__ _.,..__ _ ..- � __.__. . 1 an�i �c�tcr �n a.fl��nt�i��u��land.is a ntix i,� f{ :m;i�� .rr ui ulj�.�iniiir uE�lancf�l,in�,�.� fl:i1LIC:l3 �,ra��.iP,i� :Ilit� ',\i�utji:"tllCj='�ti'lsl�l��:iI1�J� .:UPI(II111� I?71�1211'lt�:l� >1I1��:KC.}�:Ifi' !'.Ii�llll�l. �;t'.��?7�. ha�r r�teri�i�,.,,ia<! 3.iri�cl��<��i�Y dC-6a�, :ri�l iu��.rr.�>> -__ _...._- - — - - ---. _-- _. �hc,r�•linc..�rc :t�nal•Y .lc�l'�nr Shr�r�tinc>. �1 prc�rnL ��rr nu�:th strrE' — _ ' . -- _ _ _ _ - • - E3u�t i��a�t.:ir�.fi>t�nt ��:�rn lhr yitr E3uxc rc�aal.aJjc+iri thc sitc� �-- — —�—— - _ _-- _ �1;,ny;�rhrr�a�tl:iiid.l ��:fu.i:ni.� ilnlilllL' � T fiCR':ICC IY��ifn r •.tii'tI:itcis 4rxiluJui� N-:�tC�TI�+re Exr<cnt nr.frS�•, ; � t?;miai_, ,.c,�lcr 1 nt•.nh�: -- ----- — —`— _ - — _ 1��irr yuatit� i,rt�rll:ni - r __ , 1��ater �.17r;�3 il� ��ntamin.ur�l •.ti ith � ( j�<,Ilu[:�nt,.and��r rx�rrtc�:ic< �r+c•i�. :�nd � � �lu��>fl`�Plj i`(�'l�Cll i�l'�1:11] --- ._. _ —.... .. ..___— —__. '`� ....____. -----tiuh�t��:rs h:��. r.r�.rrhrrn ic.�,nt��ir.��l r�r �uh:;u:itr�siunu��h��ui fhc riitii� :itc'i:itic [ ; c_rihrnxisc suhircicc3 i�.�coiu�,,�itir�n .-e�•��nt�r�n. rer:ntl�, hrrn rc•.�,�ii��ui�•d;•r:�ik-�cro.i��uhtritcJ ; , . i [�t�P\�r�itl�'. �i�tlt�Cfl�i'l`� �r�cYf iTR�ltlll [��i)]llj1JCUc�/!.C\C;I\:i(1.'�Il, uC�L'1'C�IIl"..�I� 1�1t' i . • ; •.iithin �}sr.itr :•n�nr <iir s�+�.::�m.ni�.tc:i tic>>n upl,uad - — —._ _—_— -_ _. .._ - --- _---� tic�il�.ui�i;iihrnerged..dsnicnis�e>n[��ir ;� /��=i!;;uzd <uhmrr�e:; ;rJi�nc•nt�c;,ni,iin rn� Y nu}�Ic•�tiich diick r�r��atiic 1.jtirt I Ir,�f littrr. j��at. +�r_�.:nii:at'cr. and arr mu>t!e Ici�d-E�:�rkid clav: c•r ciec�c�mE>r,s�d nr_anic:.rti I ��ru.r�nic la�:cr ts<o thir}.lh.rt t�:�ic�r is�hr�inica{ly annxic. _�... — -- __— _._ ._ -- `Fm.rccnt h�.h•:3nh strm di:irn;i�ul ?rr;m iii r:i ui:d'_�nnc�.hb,,t •�•ui�.�tu�n u.,r�r:urf:r_:1 !hi•.�n.luJ�••��ml•. .,II��.,c•nc,:il hc•rh; ev�-�+t�.;tt.i�L • �.'til':`.�Sl�.�'i�.'„�v'l:fl':'.:.Ittl'��l'��IIICt�lfll'�S��i�tllkk�t':�ti•.�ll Il'IJ�Ii:l\[:.::lll'::�1 1{lc'��iF'��(:�tit'�1.11:-. l �,i.��:irn.:t.�l'�t-cli:tn:.{pl:�nis IF.1( :�i �.+ri7.•;.,u�.9 c,�•.c�c�llc f)�Lt '-I �rn��nvcc ni�,tUing n gir;in.,,1'.nil.thrr�L_hr,ut m�:.�u(ihr<�_:i�.mvll�-r�zun.;.:��•d znnr. i �ic i.,,�,�tcd in Slad�r:�l tc�7:ius im�t;,n .InPr. � :ai�mi,:nucri�t�±Fn��r,y�hi�,;irrni,�•v��nr.�n:i:um;:a,.ks.�u�s`Jk••.ric � �h.ta.c.,l uutlr[rh;�r:tie l. an.i��r,itr o- m.�ria.�rrd f�•r�.:�T,,�.��ra.�� llu;>n:�r•c I:�nuar:�11:��+cri•.,J.�ii.��,�.:�1. �hlr�,�airr Ir:rSc are rcyui-�.�l�i�.�•.�.rn ��}u.di.:ampl�ih�.in r_�c.ti m:�tut...�•�d 1wnt;:siu.ur,�: tlu[lu.`d.�•ns.�l_'r.ale�Ih::n:inrt�c�:u'eklh�l!R�chlrf 1•�`�?�. t r.�r�:�'i;�• Ii�r:�E.�:!m,i7h„r,ni•L.i.i�s,;il;clv t�•I�I,,.1, .unlipht um;��:c.int a•dr�,.l„��in�:.�:;:::�tr� ::nrphih�.�.,iR�chtci 1`+`� Y'c�ur Jud�ttt�ttt�: Fi�r�rlii�n Capacitv sci,re - Q ��r cir�le <,ne uf th� li,llc��ir��:: : 1.0 .8 .fi .� .2 �---___ H i�h est I�,wE�t y? Function C`��acity (Judg��lcnt<�� :�ti�ttiti111CI1t Of�: Breedin�; «f aterbird Su ort Ili;;hc.1 1 uucti�r3in�� u;;„c�tcd 1linim:�l 1��uncfiunin� ; �corc: ' . _ - _ - -- ---� ��1i' �:�C l:tpl:tll.l� JI1;1�1'� ;1:'fC'+;�t �,cnn:l;tl'ilI ��lll i:lll'�<<.'li I �, ��I't��cfll ��-�1't'[]!'.".:i �C�4 tti't.'{;ti ��rnr:�rl•,-p,nn;�n.•nt ,uif:�.r �.�atcr. oralar�r ,wm� ti�>nl-lurn_ i�K ��crm;{nr�� .ir'.::�nt! i��luctine�U�catta�!;, tir.�cl�. :�II��i ILr n,�t,r rr:n.i;r�sli�y?�•r th:in!r ��ti.11�l�17c':I�I'�', �S:�I:1 itlt• 1�;i`: 5i��li I1:-'�l'i ,�\O \\j) \1 at.'r JrF'[It� ,uu��:rir�niinan[Et�s�t;i)Ii�'.�, i�' f \�,�uii�r.in:�it �•.i:l;iri:lr: ,irti l�i:tt�•�I n•.':�rf�:. � r� ?1 inrl:c.l in �tipril- �u��u�t` _ �—.__ _._. - ...... _. ___ ��.-'Y.. . ___ . ! n��t�..I„) Ir�C •t,;.�Yi�lI1,' �;,:,•(:Iil� � ,� 1�l'>��;r 1�i,,.�,�„i��l,C �S.,2C�, � . _ �.._._. _...._ _ -.. —_ . ._._. E �.�•'.'r F>��I� ��f t�:itir.irr h:�rdrfrd ht ,i 1 ❑it�•r pr�rl:. i�E�ir�i�tit.:tr�h�rrtfcrr�t fr. ��,1�: 1 �.�tcir :I•.•�i.r h;�n.;n� tull I�rrh�.:in�i:�i �lrruE,. i�t ' a ir:�n�,�,� htsnd i�i:�.tr�� t i � .iit��ri ,1F,r�l-�1i,.u;t. ` � �- - _ _ _ _— �1hs�u1 rquzjf pr,,��rUc,i.�,I .�:e�irr nnd , r \c,rta:i:�n.i[ui��c�l�{�1 i�n 1 ;i�r in .'. .r��aratr I I �e�rtaii�>n arr prrscnt.antl:uc .eell intcrcper�c.] nrr:�.��r�i�nr�.nt�r iei�:r�Fmr�rcE f duri�3� thc•!ti�nl ,\u��u�t j�eric�ij '� �. ___..__-- -- _ _, 1l';�i�.�r!rtic k,i,, r,�,t .ihniE�d� r� r<� t<,<,�ur � f�1:tl�•r !r•,rl.:irr��r�,r:c t�,yttirnl':n•c at Ic•a�t m��rc durinc :\pn� lunr 1 f��t �iurrn�•.1�¢:l lei=c -- ` --- -__ __ _ � ' ------ - :\ I:ir�r�;in.•t} rl hrth. is��fi'\C'1��. I�IL `.lI'� '� k t'i�.l'I:III;I�rr�•.rr r;mc�.il�. ic,Jti��rni•:1 r,i.�nr I �:3cti�rl�, mana;<<•�i tt�cr�nu��l�hc<�r.a��f .�r a'r« nc�n-t:autir :n h�:�hl�: i:�:a.i�..� itati�r n.�tt-nciUcr u� in�;si��:;�irci�c <}�rrir. -- . _ _. _�_._ . i or�i::n�cr in currr�tut�l�n�huftrr �unr� i� �I:.Iflii ic��rr i�i:urrc�undm�• huiT�r z4�nr� ntainl�: ;i niix r�t nutur:il�rti:•lanit. �crvn�llr,nd. lart�cl} c��nl:�iits intprr•.i�ro:•ur,:trr. 's�;ire,�rc:�iin�i. and��:ucr �u'<<Ilti, :ltlij ii�\�'CCC��. ._..__. _ . .— —.. __... .... ----- -----._---- Bu�� r�.�a�l�ai�•�ti.t;mt tinm thr•itr fiusv r�,a��b.tir�tcr lhr.nc- -_ _ -- -- ' -- _. _-- G�'ati�� yu.�lit� i:��cr1lcnt �'l`atcr�s lua�ih i:�►�r,irn�n:,i.d�.�ith p��Ilutants _ - __ .- ----� -----= -._�_._ �uh.tr;it�c 1tati�nr�cr brrn�ciuntc,urcil��r �luhst� rte h�it�r re r��nth hrer.rc�ontoivrc3 nt i,thrrni�c�llEfll'C[C�� li��+ltl�l:tiru�n. �:�ca��atic�n_ ��rl�cr�.�i��•.uh��..tr�l [C� C+�It14?�ICIIC�iI.�*�:I�il(1�!il. �?Y c+r I.•.rhn�. � le�e?�n� tunlc��:u�ft a�u:ii�:•.�...�c d+,ne in , c��nncctic�n�.�,Ih rr<t��rrni:��it. r� iz�liist��rica� i • ; ��nJ�tsc�ril — ___ - ---- - tiurr��undin� f.ind�r.ipc�r�snGnn.; lari�e �urr�•un.ling I��nt'.:::jE�r.�.nt:�im n��.trll:lrad� �:--- � acrca�;c ol :+rllan�l.. tni ludinu:��me�cith a s�r E�t�nd� �dillcren�•_� ii•r rr�,i3nc �h.,n thc a�s�sscd si�r. � 1 ne�t h ��r,. nr,t��latfi,rn�s.�nd.,ther_N` _ � t�c,nc.�h�,cc�.nr:t pt i�1�.�n�. u ;nher � a��f�:ial.ati�;tums intcndrd to�iss�s[�.�a[rrl��r�l � � a�utic�xl ,uu�nnr. ii�trn�ti�i rt ;�.:�:t�.�aaerhird � nestin��arc rxtcn�i�r ;ir3d arr rr�ulail� � � nr>t��i�.,rr pr�•.,nt ��r �h�� ssen t�,:�II maintainr:l. ; ; m��int.ainc•d. _--- -- -- -- -..- _ __ � P:�it+�t�hr�it� is�i.itcd inticyur�itly m ;-<,nc i�f the sitc i.3 isitr:3 Irryc ti�th h� ! �pri]-.1une h}'human.i,n fi,i�t____._ ; huin�n>cm fi>n�Jur3n�:1�tiril-June - - * �sca•i,A�;, i� ��t.nn �..:��,r.�dl ir.t�:th��ratrrhirJ hrculir.g..::n.�n rn:r. h.i�c n::m}ot'thcsrch:ua.trn-hc•: _prc�:�lrn.r al 4rrll:mJ pl.�n(3 i�.�I. :�Y•�3.t�cr,.ittd cc�n:iallc(}B[.) ' iirieroi�e tn:�pling,�t:l�:inr ul:rr�l.thrcuchn�t m,:�st r(lhc.rce.,.nc�ll•. i�;undut�•�I nmc sitr i�Icwatnt m llat{and tcrrain in�.•t.,n.li.p�.i cslrnq��r rnia��.H�.�{xi�r:t�,frii �::�sr.br•n(n'cin; hanuirxka.pudcf!ra.ctc.�� ... :ih��•nc�'��(�+uSlct Cft;umctr..;snd�•i silc 1�. I11JI1:IL'LSI�l'�I'R�ptCY ti:(�fi1L'l'. Your Jud�ment�: --_ � O Fur�ctic�n (_':��acit;• ,eore_ , i,r c:ir�rle rne of th� tol3��ri��: � _ ---_ _-�- _— � 1.0 .8 .b .4 .2 �(�! �---1 � t1i�.hest Lo��est � ,�_� F�in�tic>�� C�ai�acitti� (.Iud��11��I11�I :1�tiC�ti111C111 c?t�: «'interin� �l �Ii�;r�ttor�� «�atcrhird Sup�ort 1liklrc.l Functiunin� ' tiu��c�l�•d ^ \lini�n:�i hunctiunin� , � _�rnr�•: ` i � . � --- — --. _ - . lf;r.rti�.l�ntacii �x;rn��•.r:uit:iir�i.itr; j � fbc•�isr��,m,, m ��. 1•i�Ic ,�iTl� r �.�;iti'� I ilurt�� ,il? � t mr�>i : �li�• 1a11-��mlcr .�,nn� I .tuttnc ull �; �tr._,•t �I fI1E' I:9II''.il"ISCi �lflTl��R'lil�t4 � �� '��'� � 1 _—___._— � ��:I;CI �3C��1�':• IIl (Il��.t„(thr -.�t.� ��--.lfl'1',' i � �t ii�i;'�t:'i�. �.�:li�i .:c'��l!l�.jlllii'zS• fflt' }::��- ! rru.�:i f il:r t:�(I-�si�ur�-,�,rim�Pcr�s�,1:zre � <cinirr :E,r:i;e E,�rr��::ri.ri�.�s.::il.�lL�a<r than 's � , :h:tl:�.��.� � _- u;citir.i in:hr. m.il]��i IEic�i:c 1�h:illc�n.r.r��r,.;�r: — — � pci,ni��hle tiii•n itt uni��r:�tc�i .�rtizs�3.'t.E ---- :\ I��r,�r}�r�ni��n�+f ihc:itr�. arnmcl�trd c it th;t��atr: ih:�t :<;�rc.ri.t. r.carl�. .�II i. nnl� •ra��Fial1'r � �tr>c•r.t �r;��-i�.�unil — -- = --- '---- --- -----{ ..71Sr a�rf'��'r O1 �ari��U:<lf'}�tll C:�1rCi�nrti i. ; �/ :� rtqe�c •,t:�li r �1i(,!h� i c��t� },�c•11i.�r1tit1:�1�'� {. . � � ; .3h,�i,��pi�al �furin,�j,c.;k annu:�l inundati��n I lti�r,�t,��,��•ra�n .:t:iati��n ilnimnu��l.:. i nc•-uh tr:�t. i. �,�;� il i� �.-ri:�i.,13�, � pi�dJl,>. rtt i i�,titui. ..c . pr;h�hi�ici� thr G.�nii:��n� i ��u.1Jlr�. , _ . __ _.._ _ _- ' nr� t she��R , �,i.�ird lir�{u�ntsti ,,,, i__ t utuall. all.�i th: �Etr�> •,i�str.i tiry;irn;l� h•. , . �1�1�1...11ti�"Hl :�!�'�[i�Utt�ti ��'��cfll�k( ,�(7i1� EIU1U:1lIti��(1 �i��.�l i�U{[iSL' �Lj��l;ll}�..'C i�i;i. . . .. _—._� .. .�_.�.._.....,-__ . ..._ 1l'alrr yu.�lit�:is��.•c1E�nt 'r atc•r�; hra�il�. ��mt:iitnn;.t�L1 •,�i[li�tinlh�t;�nis :1 larcr <<irtcl� ,,t ):rnc�i.�tr�rnt. l hr �it�� ✓�'�ert.rti��ti r��r itx..��t in t;ir�nrc;•a��tLan:j<� ; is:irt.�rl� n�ai�aLCJ I,,iunU��1 I)u•.j,read c�l �� inn>tl� ��nq�ri.�c1��'��nr r�r❑ {c« nsm nati�,r ��: ` r��tt-n;ils�,i� ��r �n��i•i�e�prii.� hititl. �n•,ais3�r n.:ti�.r >�t�ii�'. _ ---_ -- _. _ . : _.__ . _-- __—.._._.__----- , nn.'�,i tl�i .,tr i� tt,ili•�1 tfc'��ltcnil� h, 111 ��1 th� i;� s '�t•�I1�'�I �t��UC?t;?� h'Y f7Uttt:tl:< `• }�uit:an�:�n I:,,�t ii3:1��ril-.3une ��; �r��,t :n \��ril-�urx• i _ __ _ �4'atri y r.tlitt !-�'?:�rlltttt 1.�trr yual�h i: �t r•. t � r —� __ 1`tf„t�.�ir•}Ea�rn��crrbctnrr.,,i3t.:urrd �.,r -- I i.h�tr:tr< h:n� r:�.rn(, i��ni��, ii-��ur��d,�i ; utfli'I'+tlsc' -Uf�)F:'ICI� li'��ttt11G�;1i11�?fl.Ctii':I`.:fltVll. I V1fR'!"�citiC�lfh�l'titCt�t�.��:1�I1:E':lilh��ll.l'�i3�:iU��ti. �.�1 { i�r letelinL i Ir�rhn� (i�n)�•>.uch :irUcitir.�tirrr.3,,nc in �. Ci)iUll'�'llt�:l`d�ll�?fif�liU�lll:' :1�11�'[i' Ilh �17.:��11�':Ij � �c,nJitic�nt _ 1_.___ _ _ _ ,..�. - ------- ` I ::n�i;t�.:r in�iir��t�ndin��hutfer tc�ox•� �� -�Land�.,�cr�n,ur:<��n�hn�• hutlir n�nr� main;•::s:1ii•. r�f naturnl :;ra:�lanc:. •.cc.�aiian.i. lar�rh ;��nt:sut��rnp:^,��, ,uri::�r. hc�r�: �_r>�unc1. � a�-n uttitral I�nd�.ar.1�ratrr � ia«-n;, �:id�r � ;�; �. _ �_ � �u�r.�ii7iJ�n�1i111c.i�l:lFC�U[1liSIR,137_C I `lIfCi �l i�ItL' �.:Ili�tic':��:'�•.�Yt(.f�ltti IU� ',\C1�:�1;�4� � ac.reagr+.�1 ficdnr.�,�I. •.�rd�nds. artcl ;catr€. �nn:l:. r�s h�.:;ri; -��il � i�icludin�_t:nm�°•<<i1)t:i c►iffcrent �a:,[er res�t:ur � thatt ihc a.;.cs�cd citc. 1��ur Ju��4:illl't11`: Fur�rti�,n C;�paritv .c��re - � ----�-_-�.=--r;r cir�lc �,n�:ol�[h�• fi�11c>��in�s: � l.0 .8 .6 .4 � -�=---- _ _ i ! Highest L.owest 9-1 �'11I1C�1�?Il C4t��a�.it�,� (Jud�l�1er�tal .��ss��sn��nt cjf): �011;�birc� I�ak�it�t :�up��t�rt r _-- _ _ -- .__ _ tlirhetit Fiu�ctiurai��;; tiu�;�;e�ti•+1 \lifiini:il f�inlclt0t7ilt� � Sc�n'i: ' t_._ __ _. --- ; �'�;�rr.r f iz i t tf� it��_ >rt�utr-. .iisf�::r �,�;i:.r ( ��,1 z:� �.�,it.•r ��. r�:'.,r E,ir.,ri�t at :in•, urn,� ; �luuE�.t all I�i ��-ar.. _i1�1�_>l .h� �:c�n�. � � 1 tht• �.c.ir_ ,._._ ,.__ _ -- -------- - _ _. ._ _ fh� �ti'rc'vn:iii�.a IaC � .t�r.,t .�I _��.:ii- � ��\c�t'r_.� r,f .1�� i> t�t� <��ttt(� ' ian,.F,,, Ic�i��•r, rimti��• til'ii.tnla*u.l. �a.�•�L�ircrri: ,t:i�l;n ' r:ii_r��r:it �.,�•tl,��t.1 I ___ ___ - _ - - � - - -- __ . li tl�:- �t. is�;i ,.�l�s 5i:ititi�� hn.hl.3n.; .in�3•:.��_ ; I:Ilt�• �.it:• i�,,n;�.t,}. '�,i.blan.. ,�.��j:_r ic��,,r_ j - t:�r�>�. th��r:�at !.:r;><�-�ti:rrncir3 trc��,;irr nunii•r��u•, itr�n?,::I tirr,;�rr •,c r, <m:ill. ;hi ;i�:tz� ,i;. {�7J �:IJ'> �t� \R(It`U ti77i'ti:til':3hLI:7l�:Ult. �ti!UI7��t.f_ �'., it1?�C[I[.I�')I;f-!t{i'f t�7:ll?}''': >);7Uf7 ti:.��.�.:t Iti �!i��"tll;�,. '� i �.:u��E�., sh��t@�c,�tirr fy r.�icrsitir. ,iEi�l{�li:n i:,re.e '� an�! i��) �h��.ntiety.�l�tr�•��;. �l�ruk,•_a,��1 �nte. i• i �„„-�r. ;�i n�:�. �'.u.ih: ar.d +.ini•�,t, ��r��seirt. j :mall. rsr,�l �nntE�r3��•�I ,iln;c�st �•itiirelti ,�i iu�n ': ` � i � i?allt r sC+ccir>. i .__ _ _.,__ __ . __-- - __. ll tlrr i c i.m �tl r�t�l�i.urtc in�.1 �sr � ,f11 thr tiiic i� �tu <-il=:� nn�•:niJ nt rsn•r;tc�nt r , rnuc;trril y�.ct?:�nd.th�n t..tl s lat��° �arieti �.�r, i,r�h• ' �.�ctl�ut�i t;t�.n i;;�� .h� �;:�t��I ,�7 h��i�,;� m:i�E. is E� �r.:_ihi t},r»tc i,;:i titrl�: nt-��_i�tc� {F.i ihr �itc i.�iut:icu.�•I ��i i;ii�� 1 t�,.�:�turni ( cunt ,: :Eu � ,-.i.3� I nr.n-i iti��r,r itt ur.,1'-�•rh thc ��r� jd�.I n<.n r.�ti,< <�� rn�;i,i � hcrh � � ; <� u,�> ;�I ii�c•s�irid•,17t�ih, it E,rc �tl� ,ic� � I�«ir; �_f ltr�•• i . 41ti�u1,, i1 � t r?�L �it�` I .:�n�cul�.�t�,'. �n i�n��:r s t�se part�i f€hc>;,ic• � • .�t:r�r�f anicl} t��c �;�tl��.it thc c�t_. _ I - __ ____= - -- _ I �c; c ,rr in wFYOtEt�{�s� I�uftc i zon�ti� � �rl �nil t��c. m urrc unilmp°F nit.r z�mrs iPr�U_m:ti.intt�, <s rnix nf i3at3ir�3 �r.�.�l:tnd..i.u;1c i .,��cl�{.nnt.:itt. ��,,�:a�,u=u: :ur#,«c.h<�rr j ,?ini��L.�sicl. �.��n{jlanii, t�rtla:�d,_;�n�3 �t,iir? ( iri�.i;td: l.t��m. and �u�� n�€�s. i �_-/ -- -- �------�----- _ � - - __.. I y -------- !--- i . -._ __ ' — i �,�nc �l ll� �itc » �.�<.�[ �3 tie��uuttl-:h•; � i� u,41 :ill �t tlic ilr�,�.i��t��: h��urntl�; � ! ht�ci m '�n t � t he'hum�u r�l,x t _-- - - = Ii,�. : ��ixi. car� ��i�tanr ti��m�h�: :itr I �� Rii , r�;,d:�iii��in t`.i. *�t�. � ___--- ------ � -- ��w.__ ._ - -- -- ---____ 1��0ut ltlds>t1tC'alt5: Fttt�i�i�i+t� C"��E»�ity �ciue - t,�. � . ur c'�rcle o:�e e,t th� ti��11i��iz�_s: --- .__._.._.__... . ... .. ". __ __'_"_"__.._. _ ..__T._----- I.0 .S .b .� ,;2r 0 j Hi�hesi Lt��c�st Furlction��'ti.p��city (J�ic��aental l��sc:ss�nent o#�): ;4f�ppo�� f C'haractcristic Ve�;etation - _ -- �- __. . . _ ----- --- � IIiKhEat Fi�itt•tiunit�� ul;;e:�tecl 11ii2in�al i�u��crio��in� i , Sct�re: � _-- _____ �i�t� ,l,nih .anc3 hrrhti trr tl!�rctici�i ittJ �?n!� �}n� �l�nt t�nirt iltti �},iuh. lierl�l i� � a�� c11-fntc.r��i r� thruu�k�on311rc ue prr�cnt If tr��ur� rc5rni.�i.iny.ur tie�� nld and lf trrc,arr pr�tir.�i.:i�i �i�� ,i�riii�, � � � lai��r. �.�.itli.ihuf:Cj161i�.�icl�.nce nf reqeneratian � }_._w.-. - I 1f�hrsit>s arr E,reseni, sll,�f thc�igniticantl�• �. _._..-_ �f shn�l?s�re present.tltrt•arc c�anprisrd af � p�e;r i:a=�4iruh.pecics ai�c nau�:r� just nne s��ccie,.a�1�3 it i�in,n na,aE�e __ _._ ---- ---__ . __ -- _ _]fhcrt�� u3�r pirst�ii, aU��f the��=nitis::stath� �li]3rrhs arr p�caz•ut. llirk ar�c c._��n�,ri,c�<l�,# pre�ent hrrt,. eetr�.�s�ns�ti:�s jusl�ne rpc.cir,. a�tcl ;t i4 nc:�n-niiii�e �lia't�rt��p„`�r;�phic relief is e.re�c --"_ _ _ �Tlt�su]>strate is�eiv flat.ecstntiallti 1liwiim4��1...puddl�ti �tc.i _---- pn�>Etil�itin�tl:e ti>m�an��n<,t�u:3c�Ir• . _ __ _ ._,.. -- Sprin,•ttr�i�•�iu►+c:c:ti� etcr level.c�rc�p�er; Spriai�tsme�� iti� lr.r(� fli,ctu,�t�� rr�lrc�� _ _ �` -�o�.r1� (• : ,a-rti.:a! in:.lies�er�O:faj,Vti. r.��>>d1ti t �2 it�rf�e�prr i i)da�.,a�c ��t? Ei'�iitlkCJ - -------- �� - - -__ -- -_ _ - --- --- Ilikl�i��l Funclianin�! tiuy;�e�lyd �---- �linim:il F�mctianin�; tCOI'l`: �:�il}�'� :�l':�tl�' 1< f 1 . •,i�i�r�f ii�.�urntf•,hc I 1-<<r:��;ut�•I t{ii ••itr i, �i:u��i t�r��u:ntl.,h�— i t; �n�r:��n ��.��f ' lsiitn�r.�o�. I��•l , . _ —— -- ; s.._ __. . - - - --- --� '. Ni:•,, i�1�arc J�.1.mS (r.>>n;h: �irr ' ; �k3w�, r� :i�1�a�11�an Ih� !t,: — ----- � - � ------ __ . , _ , i u�,i � , �ri io iltr:��nnihuU,i;. �:�tri��c,f i� ' �/1 mJ�r�.cr ir thc.;�t�tr;huttn_ lrr,l�.? � ('-:�.�, I.nlll[11�. �-P1s1.1F:1i ` j �,I �c�.�+:t Sll,ttll� llL��f�I��U� .Ul::i�c. f�I.: :I.�l;fl�: � �FI\�-I1S �1[lt� 1-1��'.\ :fi��'. --___� L:,n.! ;��rr ui;ur:��un.iin_� hultrr zt�r�r, : :m.i c��rr i�i :urn,�i:uicr�:�f�ultcs I,n,�;•I� ` E�t •.ji�131111 1171I'. d Flll\ '�t I]dItIC3I ,'�.1�SI::11i1. ; rc�ntaiii: im��ci�i�,ua��trti.c��. hnr�� •i��und. I;�•.+n•- I i ' n.ii�<< �hir.hl..n�1. .c� .�.if;in.;.«�•t1,in:1•, an�l � .in�1 r�r,ti cr�.F�> ,; � � ;..�t�_i --- -- � � ��ur .it��1�tl�ritS>: �'llllt'ilt�I) ��:I]��tl'If�' ��Cf(t' � UC C'IfC�t Utlt t�1 lfiC tlT��i�\till�': . _. ..__..-_ ....____—__ _`__.._._�.._._._p_. .._..___—L_..__.. _ . r^:• . . . .. . �.11 .A .V .� .� :�i . �I I�}lt'.Sl j.t>�4'C:tit � �i+'ti1. ��II`1T113ilXC �C�Uf 1LRl'h��tl �,sEi;l�lt� ,a.�c��1T14t1i� t�� n•��rilin_� l�iCl17 c+tl t�1C :��C��R1CIlI tiun�tnan F��nn 1.�. :')). fic ;ut�e t�, iniEir,it�th�lt �'OD U>Ctj I}it' �t7cl�'TT1Ctll:ti �l�tht>�l. 9h Scicnti�c Name Common Name lndicator Stntus ,�Il�rrr.�� rtrbru red alder l�n(' Alur�ectn•trs gel�icirlcrtirs meadow foxtail F/�CW+ �lrrhe�l�rthe�-imi elatius tall oatgrass UPL B��o�nz�.s {torcleucetrs sofr brome UPI. Culoced�-irs deczu-ren.�� incense cedar NL Curcx stiputu saw-beaked sedge FACW+ C��n•lirs cor,tirta var. ruli�o,-,�icu beaked hazelnut FACU Crutucgtrs n�orro,�n�nn English hawthorn FACU+ Ctrpresstrs x le�•lrurclii Leyland cypress NL Ci�listr.c scopuritr.s Scotch broom NL Duircirs currotci wild carrot NL F�r�tu.cetinn u�-ve�rse common horsetail FAC Gcrui�iiini dissccttu7a dissected geranium NL G�iun niucrop/ri•/lrrm large-leaved avens FACW- Hccicra l7elix English ivy NL I�u/crrs lui�atus common velvet grass FAC Hi7�ochuris r-adreata rou�h cat's ear FACU trniperzrs sgucmtatc� ornamental juniper NL Lcrpsa��u can»�tnais nipplewort NL 1��trcunthemarm vtrlgure ox eye daisy NL Lntus coi-nicarlutus bird-foot trefoil FAC Malt�s clomestica apple � FACW Phrrlrrris u�-i�ndinuceu reed canary grass FACW Plu�rtugo lanceolata English plantain FAC Pucr J�ulust�-is fowi bluegrass FAC Pou trivialis rough bluegrass FACW se uclotst�ga menzie.sii Douglas-fir FACU Qu�rci�s gar��t�a��a Oregon white oak NL Rui�unculus re��ens creeping buttercup FACW Rhumnus purshianu cascara FAC- Ruhirs discolor Himalayan blackberry FACU Sali.r Tt,rcida ssp. lasiundru Pacific willow FACW+ Scrlr.x scoulerianu Scouler's willo�v FAC Srnecio jacoboeu tansy ragwort FACU TriJolii�m dubiinn suckling clover UPL �'ulj�ia hromoides six weeks grass NI . • �� TY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Community,Dne(opment S(rnping?I BetterCommunity (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Yalid for Six (6) Months) _ , , c�n�o� � t vo �; _ ��: ��E ' � _ _ _ __ _ : - NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: r-+S I L�i r � j�/��-4,��J � h� �(�c�+ h�'r AGENT: 4 r �� ' �oc ' Phone: �S�S) �-,3 �'�f ~ �v 1 (czl Phone: . �'s t.%,� -- ( _ S PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: ��I Z.�� 5�.: -[�L�'"� ��_ TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): Z� l l �t�tJ� C:��=� �G�� NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: S L tZ - �'�t s; h v� �,.;� s ��,,; ;,� �� - rL. �%� L �-° �1� i ►� f c•..i r • �� _.. .,�..� PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: S �-c��: l� zc �v� r� �v 5 t� f i t_,��;,�,,. �, «� .�.� ,�� J✓- G S�(.7/1 t�l r',C•ctilG Nc !L�'C't L L`-'�cU v [' F�nrl.u Y �[) •- I G�� C.a �.,c� c� � vti�Z ��r, �, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: N P.�v:a �� - stti,�Si D��J�rr� ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: � -� � IOMIN6 DISTRICT DIMEMSIOIUII REQUIREMENTS [Rdf�r u C�d�S�cd�a 1i. �C� l MINIMUM LOT SIZE: � sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 5� ft. Max. building height:�ft. SeW�cks: Front ��G ft. Side�ft. Rear G ft. Comer �-v ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: ��% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area:��%. � NEI6HBORNOOD MEETIN6 [R�f�r ta tfi�N�ighb�rh��d M��bng Baad��l � ` `��P�' ��--� THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submittinqyour application or the application will not be accepted. ' NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential ApplicationlPlamm�g Division Section �' NARkAT1YE [Refer te Code Cha� 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. ,� IMPACT STUDY [R�fer to Code Secdans 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specfically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ❑ ACCESS IR�fer te Cdapters 18.705�nd 18.7651 Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: ❑ WALKWAI REQUIREMEMT'S [Refer u C�d�Secbon 18.705.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industnal uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Ref�r t�C�de Cdapt�r 18.7301 > STREETS: feet from the centerline of � LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. � FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDIM6 NEI6NT PROVISIONS [Ref�r t�C�d�S�ctl�a 18.730.010.BJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: > A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least half('/2) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. ❑ BUFFERIN6 AMD SCREENIM6 (R�fer te 6od�Cdapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may o� be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential AppliCatioNPlannmg Diwsion SeCtion The ESTIMATED REQUIR� dUFFER WIDTHS applicable to you, ��oposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: ❑ IANDSCAPIN6 [Refer ta Code Chapters 18.745,18.T65 and 18.7051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. ❑ RECYCLIM6 [Ref�r to Cod�Chapt�r 18.1551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. ❑ PARIOM6 [Rcf�r t�C�d�S�cd�a 1a.765.0401 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: > Standard parlcing space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. � Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: > All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Amencans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. > BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADIN6 AREA REQUIREMENTS [R�f�r to C.de Sec�on 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Applicalion.Plann�ng Divlsion Sec6on � � ❑ BICY�LE RACKS [Refcr to Code �an 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ,� SEMSITIVE LANDS [R�fer to Code Chapt�r 18.Tl51 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibilitv to precisely identifv sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibilitv of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES [R�fer u Ced�Secdon 18.]I5.080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. � CLfANWATER SERYICES[CWSI BUFFFA STANDARDS [R�fer to R a 0 96-44/USA R�guladens-Ch�pt�r 3l LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Desi n Criteria: The EGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAURESOLUTION &ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT 4 WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSfTIVE AREA CORRIDOR PER SIOE • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 1 10 to <50 acres 15 feet � >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and onds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 1 10 to <50 acres 30 feet 1 >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravineb Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for sUeams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intertnittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/sVeam or wettand vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a staRing point for measurement. SVegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated comdor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirtns slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applica6on Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residen6al Appl�cation/Planrnng Division Seclion � � Restrictions in the VegetatE rridor: NO structures, developme��, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construcfion Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. ��CWS Service Provider Letter: RIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R8�0 96-44 sensitive area req uirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ❑ SI6MS (R�f�r t�C�dc Chapt�r 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be pe�rnitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. � TREE REMOYAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [R�f�r t,Cod�S�cdan 18.790.030.CJ � � r��^ � '�-�� A TREE PLAN F4R THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TRE� prepared by a certi f ie d ar borist s ha l l be provi de d for any lot, parce l or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the Iocation, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: � Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; � Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existin� trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that finro- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; � Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; � Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. ,� MRI6ATION [Refer to Code Scctlen 18.790.060.E1 *� ��1��+° REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applica6on Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-ReSidential Appl�cation,Planning Division SeCtion � ➢ If a replacement tre � the size cut is not reasonably aval e on the locai market or would not be viable, the Dircctor shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: � The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. ❑ CLEAR YISION AREA [R�f�r u C�d�Chapt�r 18.7951 The Cit requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT �8) FEET IN HEIGHT at �oad/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting streeYs functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ AUDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refcr to Code S�ctlon 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/z TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1'/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS - 18.330�co�aroo��u�� H.62O(Tgard Triangle Desgn Standards) - �H.765(Off-SVeet Parking/Loadirg Requirements) _ �$.�O(Direc6ors Interprehabon) 18.630�w�n�s��R��i c�c�� # 'I$.775(Sensibve Lands Review) _ 'I 8.350(Planr�ed Devebpment) 'I 8.�05(Access/EgresslCirculation) _ 'I$.7HO(Signs) _ 18.360�site�e�opment Re�ew) 'I S.�'I O(Accessory Residen6al Units) - 'I S.7H5(femporary Use Pertnils) _ �H.37O(VarianceslAdjustrnents) 18.715�oe��y c«T,p��s� � 18.790(Tree Removaq �� :.��c.�b�.a _ 18.380(zo�irg t�ap�eXt Amer�dments) 18.720(�esg��orr�atib��►y standards) - 18.795(visua��earance Areas) _ 18.385(�,tisce��aneous Permits) �S,_ 18.725(En�ronmen��Pertormanoe Standards) _ 18.79$(wire�ess Communication Faa�iees) � 'I S.39O(Decision Making Procedures/lmpaa Study) 18.730(�cceptions To oe�e�opment standards) _ 18.810(sveet�uti��ty�mprovement standaras) _ 18.410��oc u�a,d�� -" 18.740�H�c«;c o�e�y� _ 18.420��and Parti�ons) �8.742(Home Occupation Pertnils) _ 18.430�s��o�� 18.745(�andscaping�s«eenng standards) _ �H.S�O(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(rv�anutac�uredrtv�o�i�Home Re9u�ations) _ 1 H.52O(Commercia�Zoning Districts) 18.755(Maed So��d waste�Recyding Storage) � 18.530 pndustria�Zoning Districts) 18.760(Noncontomiirg Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residen6al ApplicatioNPlanning Dinsion Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENT'. ..�.1� , I S��C c2.11 �i�Lti2 C 1/��t�I PROCEDORE X Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLlCAT10N SUBMITTAL PR96ESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: A lications submitted bv mail or dropped off at the counter without Plannina ivision acceptance mav e returned. The Planninq counter closes at 5:00 PM. Ma s submitted with an a lication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8'/�" x 11". One 8'/z" x 11" ma o a ro ose ro ect s a e su mitte or attac ment to t e sta re ort or administrative decision. Applications with un olded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential AppliCationlPlanning Division Section The administrative decisior public hearing will typically occur a�. ximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard �'ctt�tl�, : �.�(�F,'�� . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is availabl from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDIM6 PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to ap�lv those system develo ment credits to the first buildin ermit issued in the develo ment (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH T E DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). e con erence an notes cannot cover a o e requirements an aspects re ate , to site planning that should ap ply to the development of your site plan., Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Gode shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask an questions of Cit staff relative to Code requirements prior to submittin an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THiS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BV: tVv�i l`� `�� (ITY OF TIGARD PIANNING DIYISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PNONE: 503-639-4111 FAX: 503-684-1291 ��---4 ' S�� 1 i� - � Z 1 Z EMAIL• rs�� a�a.tigard.or.us TITLEI8(CITY Of TIGARO'S fOMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT fODE)INTERNETADDRESS: WMIYY.ci.tigard.OfAS H:lpattylmasterslPre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 15-Dec-04 (Engineenng section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residentlal ApplicationlPlanning Orv�s�on Section City of Tigard Pre-application Meeting Notes 7/20/2006 Proiect• Type II Sensitive Lands Review Stream Stabilization at 14200 SW 72"d Avenue Initial Steus: • Review Chapter 18.390, Decision-Making Procedures (Type II) • Review Chapter 18.775, Sensitive Lands Review • Review Chapter 18.530, Industrial Zones • See code section 18.775.020.F.1.a for criteria for SL permit within a drainageway • Respond to approval criteria in section 18.775.070.D. Provide evidence of how proposal meets criteria through facts, findings and conclusion. Reference site plan and other documentation. • Neighborhood meeting required � �..; ��,,� jI ) Submit• • Application form • Fee- $2,286 ( �� 11� • Response to approval criteria(narrative) • Impact study to show impacts on neighboring properties, Ball Creek and drainage system, see code section 18.390.040.B.2.e • Evidence of neighborhood meeting ( 1--(p� 1.—C> • Site plan to show existing and proposed conditions • Approval letters from US Army Corps of Engineers, Oregon Department of State Lands and Clean Water Services • Landscape plan or plan that shows vegetation to be removed and replaced (if applicable) � 2-sets envelopes, addressed and stamped (Do not submit with application. The � �y k, � � City will request when application is deemed substantively complete.) ( p Timeframe• • Submit application • Staff conducts 30-day completeness review • Applicant provides 2 sets envelopes, addressed and stamped �`1��-�— �• Staff conducts 6-8 week review period after deemed complete (when envelopes are received). Includes the following: o Notification of proposal to neighbors and affected agencies 0 2-week comment period - - "' o Staff decision issued in 4-6 weeks '`j� o Notification of decision to neighbors and affected parties �� • Appeal period, 2 weeks (decision final unless appealed) Recommendations: • May want to discuss proposal with Public Works, contact Rob Murchison, Project Engineer, (503) 718-2699, or Eric Hand , Stormwater/Wastewater Manager, (503) 718-2607 July 2006 August 2006 S M T W T F 5 S M T W T F S 30 31 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 9 10 11 12 13 74 15 13 74 15 16 17 18 79 16 17 18 19 20 21 22I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 23 24 25 26 27 28 29I 27 28 29 30 37 Thursday, July 20, 2006 -Pre-A s CD Meetin s Early 8:00 AM 9:00 AM (9:00 AM- 10:00 AM) Marie Hagenlock 503-403-1251 14200 SW 72nd Avenue SLR 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM Late Tasks Notes I Kristie Peerman 1 5/31/2D06-2:24 PM . - ' � PORTLAND - SEATTLE P B S VANCOWER EUGENE BEND TRI-CITIES TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 31, 2006 TO: City of Tigard-Current Planning Staff FROM: Tom Archer- PBS Engineering & Environmental RE: Gerber Legendary Blades-Stream Bank Stabilization Project 14200 SW 72�d Avenue, Tigard, Oregon PBS Project#70477.002 Enclosed please find a Pre-Application Conference Request for a proposed project in the City of Tigard. Our firm is working with the owner to design, permit and oversee construction of the project. This packet contains all the information requested. We are hoping to schedule a pre- application conference as soon as possible as we are working toward completing the project this summer. I will serve as the primary contact for the project. Any comments or questions can be directed to me at (360) 213-0443. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 1310 Main Street Vancouver,WA 98660 360.690.4331 MAIN 360.696.9064 Fnx B8B.8�3.7Z73 TOLI FREE ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL www.pbsenv.com .` I Proiect Narrative—Gerber Stream Bank Stabilization Proiect Project Purpose and Need The proposed project involves stabilization of portions of the stream bank that threaten to erode an existing asphalt parking area on the Gerber site. In some instances, the distance between the stream and the parking areas is less than 3 feet. The purpose of the project is to modify and strengthen the banks of the stream channel to prevent further erosion from impacting the parking lot or structures. Project Scope The project will involve re-grading and modifying the existing stream channel for approximately 300 feet along the east and south boundaries of the parking area. The primary methodology will be to use reinforced earth - composed of filter fabric overlaid with lifts of native soil, which are then planted with riparian vegetation (e.g. willow). The resulting structure is resistant to erosion and provides the benefits of a natural stream bank. The specific amount of soil that will be moved during the project is not known at this time. However, we anticipate that it will be approximately 50-100 cubic yards. The applicant is also proposing to remove a small concrete weir which is located immediately downstream of the confluence of the two streams on the site (refer to attached Site Plan). During storm events the weir impedes the flow of water, resulting in flooding into the existing parking areas. The installation date and purpose of the weir is not known. The project will not involve any modifications to the existing parking area or any of the other structures on the site. The work is not anticipated to extend onto any of the adjoining properties. Permitting Scheme The project team and owner have met with various regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over the project including Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) and Cleanwater Services (CWS). We believe that the project will be eligible for permit under the State Programmatic General Permit, administered by DSL. ODFW has indicated that neither of the streams on-site is fish bearing. Questions 1) Is a type II Review required for this project? 2) What are the permitting requirements for this project? 3) What is the timeline for permitting the project? 4) What specific information is required for submittals? 5) Does the city have a specific in-water work window when work is allowed? 6) Does this work trigger any modifications to the existing facilities or improvements? 1310 Main Street Vancouver,WA 98660 360.690.4331 MAIN 360.696.9064 Fnx 688.$73.72�3 TOLIFREE ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL www•pbsenv.com PRE-APPLICATION = �' CONFE RE NCE RE QUE ST 13125 SWHaII BIuL, Ti�cn� OR 97223(503)639-4171 FAX:(503)684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applican� Fiskars Brands Inc. / Gerber Legendary Blades Division Address: 14200 SW 72°�Avenue Phone: 503-639-6161 Case No.: p��LW(.-voo Y 7 City: Tigard,Oregon Zip: 97224 Receipt No.: �b— ��7�{ Contact Person: Marie Hagenlock Phone: 503-403-1251 Application Accepted By: [C� Date: 5�(31 1 v fo Property Owner/Deed Holde�{s): ASGARD LLC DATE OF PRE-APP.: � � 2� j 0 �, TTME OF PRE-APP.: G� : c:0 �� Address: 14200 SW 72°d Avenue Phone: 503-403-1225 PRE-APP.HELD WITH: City: Tigard,Oregon Zip: 97224 Rev,4/25/06 i:\cuipin\masters\revised\Pre-AppRequest.doc PropertyAddress/Location(s): SAME AS ABOVE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted ithout the required submittal elements) Tas Map&Tax Lot#(s): 2S112AA-00300/023.81 [�Pre-Application Conf.Request Form Zoning:IH 5 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: [� Brief Descnpnon of the Proposal and any Site Size: 5.0 AQZES site-specific questions/issues that }�u would like to have staff research prior to the PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION meeting. [,/� Site Plan. The site plan must show the All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by proposed lou and/or building layouts drawn the applicant and received by the Plaruiing Division a minicnum of one (11 to scale. A1so, show the location of the week �rior to officially scheduling a �re-application conference date/time to subject property in relation to the nearest allow staff ample time to prepare for the meeting. streeu; and the locations of driveways on the subject property and across the street. A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of the �,3' ViciniryMap. Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday morninQS. Pre-application conferences are one (1) hour long and are typically � The Proposed Uses. held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM. [7f Topographic Infom�ation. Include Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a FROM 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. MONOPOLE project, the applicant must attach a copy of the letter and proof in the IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXI'ECTED TO ATTEND THE form of an affidavit of mailing, that the PRE-APPLICATION C�NFERENCE IN YOUR GROLTP, PLEASE collocation protocol was completed (see INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard Community ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODA?E THE Development Code). GROLJI'. [� Filing Fee$351.00 �� 7/�qID.� J � �° � ��,�-- � - . �� , �ri�;G'�.� ��j� , "'� � •,�:,�.s.�-' , -.: ; .,, � i, � _ . , J � '� � �•' �i''�� -. �_ 1 rj � I � n�55c� _ .+ , r r� ' i� _ � � - 4 1.' ► � '�,� i P, 27 � ' .r�r '` (-• , � _.�►�--?. S ' _-.. �rr�� ;';;i; ll� :; : `�= a ',, 5 • �� , / � �� {�`JS , - ,.; ,:_�,�,'�.. :' _ J'-!, ��;' "; .j 4 ��%rr�. � , . �'�.•F+�r.J•�' • ' "� �' ' ' `P1� ,�..Cr,, ..I , 1; 4�� v -fi: ;�rs; � � .,.A�'" �,�n.._ :� � .�, '• � .:� � . , • ♦- C ' C % � ` ti' • �1. � ` - ••� • i a• ��J.,�.ti � �w.r. �d c�.�• �_ .• �.� ��fNl�r �=L+ r. .� .�''��,rJ�� `�'' � . . � .� � ,� .�,� ;i, � qti�. ��; � ; , ��;, _ , .�'� � � �- - � ,• �} °� .. - 4••�,a:� � '�._' i - yf r.�.�. • _ o t�..•( E'+ �� .F�`��_ t r;�' • '' :�;, '7. - •,�� , �CL �tA"Id�l�`C 6�-;�;��'�... a.�, /�'�' • i � .7ZS,�`�y3i' ' • '��' li f.�� • � ��'� • -- �.�.��"S;'� �V��.F' �el.�• . .� 4 -�� i=�►Y ,' •�� I � .r-� �� .r �:_ j � �,r-. r ' �;• � ��•�'� � �eih�� _` �.' .. . i, �� .�; , � u`� •f .: �� !i, a � • �" t's ■� ! ) i�, . . + �.' � �� ...��.r � 6 r ;< < � -, ;� �•'`� ,. �= r a. •C �` ' `�-� ` �; , � �,, .'• 1 �:,� :,;: ,►.�--'; •;�' fi .: � , -V � �'�.',�Ly ��,� ti`r.: � R.h •�'f� 'r �: I s�Z+� �i' _ 4 ' 1 . . � �� r. ,�, a,��' 1� ;n, r�_�t ' .� � �� ' �; ' ,T �f 5 .t; y �� - � ,~�L1� � ��O 4 r �• r a . , 1 ., � _ �!s'�! .: �_ i.. s<• , i. m '�:: I� Q` � 7Q��'- '� • �� tA . I.��r p�, '�Y 44., o fi . �� ttr � � .; ' .- ..a 1 39 '�• ,�!' •••..,� 1� _ ; iF . �s. . ��. _ ..• .u� , ��I r� � \.` � - ri ��• /�, • T FARM`�" I � . '. . . . �� '- N� Jl4�� :��- !�i �i�� -.`�•� .'l R:i� ';�,_�l�\ � � - � • Ui '� a � `6 .�' 'li ` f •: rw §�;. .:,.�..• _ ►r 9¢ - •+� `;"� �.♦ PROJECT LOCATION " �'. -�-�- ,> � .w ► . ��,kc Y . � i T. �'��,�5 • � � �:.: � '� �A � -,, — `-___•J° ��'` Q�,,'+:� � � . - o ':� . .1 � �� - c �:;...- - 1 . � �'' �i.� - =` -�* � ..�:, .Z - � , � �'•_= - -- -- ., �.,, ..�.��- 1 �,� N - s_�� j :� .. �.. �. - • ';"' f 4 :��-: ;,' � a�t 7•:i3c►ni � -� ;, f ■: ��-��.6� � - _�• :Y. rJ'.' � ._ ,T- . . � b'io)_��w��ePN'1'�a� . . .. ' s � ��r . :'� �� yS` �, - �,. ..- -• •� • , �'� • . - iy"j n� - �rl� �l ... • i� .--~�`.,,;.' � 'f ! ,.f .�'. � ' �t ' 1 ' �r � _,( � ` r � . .� r. x ,• -. .; 4J • <.. ` ti �� =� � y . ' �� ;. � �._ l' �I`i �� •��'• ____ -•, C, '�'. `� ..1.� .+1 ,v ` ~ � � �+� � . � - �'��.'� 'u,�.�dli�4 PaNK� r! r �. � ` � ---- -- A-" _ — -_ - < ---+�� d. 1� �, • w. '�. S" � f tr�cA• , �y .�. ,,�`Fi � • , l 16 •,�' �-1= .'. '� " � q �'' � `' . 1;`12 "� �"'�°° i : �� `r r - ; �"* --- •r - „� �� ' Il � °� Tnjj��P. *` � ��c �'�f fF?5",.+ . ' � n � r �', � Y � Fue ° � �� '� =�t•, i' 'J 2 �� , ��:VJ� IJ; L �. --t, g� �y�`j��S -�y��,. �{ ..._ � % i ,� F � \i--�/�• �.~�` .�; � � j� a — , .)' :c `� �� .�� - t Q e � a `�` ;ca :I, R, 9�> .�;�: n . . . _ .- , o '� 't._ ^R�. ;f�� ,:� � ! � ;� � � ' woli� �.3�•_ . .. �.r- � . ��- � . '� �'� � SOURCE:USGS LAKE OSWGGO QUADRAtiGI.L UN,l9ri I i MAP REVISED 1984. � SITE /\ � - �PORTLAND ' ' i SALEM 5 •eoGetvE O 1,000' 2,000' 4,000' s e 3 � OREGON SCALE: 1•=2,000� � Prepared for. GERBER LEGENDARY BLADES ' � Project#: FIGURE _ �oa��.00z SITE LOCATION MAP g P B S Date: 14200 SW 72ND AVENUE 1 � MAY 2006 TIGARD,OREGON . aORTLAND cEATTLE P B S VANCOUVER EUGENE 9EN� iR�-CITiF�• TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 6, 2006 TO: Jim Grimes—Department of State Lands cc: Kathryn Harris—Corps of Engineers FROM: Tom Archer—PBS Engineering & Environmental RE: Gerber Legendary Blades—Stream Bank Stabilization Project 14200 SW 72"d Avenue,Tigard, Oregon PBS Project#70477.002 Enclosed please find a Project Narrative describing work that is proposed for a project in the City of Tigard. We are seeking advice/feedback on our proposed design, as well as the most expedient permitting scenario. As the integrity of portions of the asphalt parking area is threatened, we are working toward completing the first phase of the project this summer. I will serve as the primary contact for the project. Any comments or questions can be directed to me at(360)213-0443. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 1310 Main Street Vancouver,WA 98660 360.69D.4331 r.iaw 360.G9G.9064 vnz 888.8737273 ro..Frtt= ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL www.p6senv.com Proiect Narrative—Gerber Stream Bank Stabilization Proiect Project Purpose and Need The proposed project involves stabilization of portions of the stream bank that has eroded an existing asphalt parking area on the Gerber site (see attached photos). The purpose of the project is to modify and strengthen the banks of the stream channel to prevent further erosion from impacting the parking lot or structures. The project will be separated into two phases; Phase I will involve repairing those areas that pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the Parking area and will be conducted this season. Phase II will involve a longer stretch of the stream bank and will be completed in 2007. We are requesting approval of Phase I during this work season. Project Scope The total project (Phases I and II) will involve re-grading and modifying the existing stream channel for approximately 300 feet along the east and south boundaries of the parking area. This is the area between the north property boundary and the current location of the weir. The primary methodology will be to use reinforced earth - composed of filter fabric overlaid with lifts of native soil, which are then planted with riparian vegetation (e.g.willow). The resulting structure is resistant to erosion and provides the benefits of a natural stream bank. The applicant is also proposing to remove a small concrete weir which is located immediately downstream of the confluence of the two streams on the site (refer to attached Site Plan). During storm events the weir impedes the flow of water, resulting in flooding into the existing parking areas. The installation date and purpose of the weir is not known. The project will not involve any modifications to the existing parking area or any of the other structures on the site. The work is not anticipated to extend onto any of the adjoining properties. The City of Tigard regulates this project as part of their Sensitive Lands Ordinance. Activities involving more than 50 cubic yards of fill require a Type II Land Use Review. The time required to obtain this permit would not allow this work to be accomplished during this in-water work season. As such, we are proposing breaking the project into to phases. The frrst phase would be designed to stay within the 50 cubrc yard threshold and include the followrng areas: Area 1 —Active erosion along streambank-There are two areas in which the stream has eroded to within 3 feet of the edge of the asphalt (refer to attached pictures). These areas are approximately 25 feet and 15 feet in length and 4 feet above the streambed. These areas are shown on the accompanying site plan. We are proposing to install one foot of compacted angular '/. minus rock foundation wrapped in a coir fabric overlain with several lifts of soil, also wrapped with coir fabric. Topsoil and native grass seeds will be placed over the coir fabric for temporary stabilization. It is estimated that this work will result in 20 cubic yards of fill material. Area 2-Weir removal—We are proposing to remove the weir and re-grade the streambed for approximately 15-20 linear feet. We anticipate this will reduce the existing flow restriction and reduce the frequency of overbank flow immediately upstream. It is estimated that this work will result in 25 cubic yards of fill material.ln total,this work would involve less than 50 cubic yards of removal/fill activities. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife has been consulted as to the presence of anadramous fish. They have determined that the stream does not provide fish passage. A copy of their determination letter is attached. 1370 Main Street Vancouver.WA 98660 360.690.4331 r.wiN 360.696.9064 rnx 888.B73]273 Toi<<H�= ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL www.pbsenv.com Gerber Legendary Blades Streambank Stabilization Project-Photos �N.. � �'� Y�y�l)., '^�'�"�/7 «� 1I ..�..N �,{�}. //+"� '��"�; . 1^'� ��_ � � yC1 � � . f�'. .� � . "�r JI 1��_ � .v:' �r,-' 4`+r` ` �• �� Jf �•� �, " . .� "��fr � J' , 3�� ,•�'� ' A, r � � �'�� '„f[�i �,}�-f �{"��,� ��. C.. ��.v. **? �ft��r'�` � /+� y ,` ^ . '` � r � ��j ♦ yY. M ��(' r� ��.: .� ��r�' 1 .:��!1%i(..r�/ ,•F . ... . [2♦ �`, �� 1.� T_ �• `_ � •'i y��►.'. A � ,� �.�r 1� �� /� 7f�1� �`�(�.. . �'l�i� ��c�f f�'�' �.� , y /.f�X �t��_1�, 7c _, y f I� ./tl��a �,� . . � .��f�r' �� • 41r- ��r � ''.. b • � , �,: .e£ ,M�, �7't � ..*�,. ;:� ,,r �� , r �� .; � Y a' �4" ` � i' '.,,P_ '.•-e�, ' .r �` • � � r-_; �.� 7 .••' }' �,- O i � .� 1 . .. �' ! , I�. 'r►''r �;�t.Ps. �_» �- '�j��'��t ;, !Yy,,s� .i/�",'�,��- '� . �.r '1'�?y: .•. 3,��I�, �1'�/" �-*'� .� • r'''} ' ".rY�l�d�� '��.L��;��'�}� � - .-n.� ' tii►• ''' . . + `^•" � �r :�;,;q. ,�.; , `" ,v �.� ;,!li� ;� � �,.,� `•�- . _ �'''��,:; , � . . � . . � �: �'� , � . ; 3L �. :rCf� . . ' . � . , �., t .• .. . f ,. .�. $ .:r� �a ' , �� '�� '!� .I�/r ,�. .yi/� 1 . , . {�1. " IJ1�� C,�� `. � �� . {' ` . y,.1'..�.l�( . . .�:� .�, _; � �T, �. . ' �Y� + .. . �, �' -y!4� �, � .�`�,�1 + ,' , � ,� � � '�� .� ,'/-i.'i .',/� r. ,., i:y4�� , � �.y�� .. ` 'r�'�.6,• ', �.�•ti.� . �� . - ' . ' . . . . .a'. PHOTO 1: Erosion along Ball Creek `i�'� �l",_ � r �f�rp�'�.e�� ~`t � 7 �� ~ 'j,�`�.� \j� �" �. ' .� �r � a�,�5 ♦. .J` � A* .' r K y�r '',c. ,r.�`' �;`.°��' �• ,+��`., �,?' �,'�' � ,. n .� � � �`4a � e, � i .,y� V�ti �' ,�. _;y1��y= ,J�`�� ♦ � � �",F �:.: �F � �. ,�a•�a� �y.-t -.,.. � a � :� 2Y^'"i �`� `�2, ,,+? �"t � •��.-,�7�ti;��4`��+�y h� � ♦ �"ti .-J_ � �j S .. 't''L :Y k,i,'��%� �.►•!• Y'� �'��F� i ��.� >. ;�V. ,.� ��+''�4'- . • �; �`t ' y:,'�'l��y�;,r�. .�� •d, -• M.. - ✓r•� t:��t . . ...�\ . Ar• � ,t�„� '' � . � �':� � '''4*� i'�,�.�-,, `�� ,. \. `�� '�,:�..,fi��:� ��rck( -��` .Y,��b �`�. , •.�J =�' . r ,`�+,��,1° .�F. v` ;��`'�'''° ''��'��.�,�. . "�►�,:' � � . , - � ¢. _ � ._ .�.. .�� .�� - _:,�� _ �� ., �_, M r �e "r Y.y ".�' �� f}S r:�' ��,•�... -�� .. �,��.:.a _ . , �1 ' - . a r --�'� . .� . . _- � � � � . " �_t:±. . . L ... ' _ . _ ... ._ . . PHOTO 2: Water from flooded parking lot draining back into Creek Gerber Legendary Blades Streambank Stabilization Project-Photos ,.�., . � . �. � �:Y�t �. .o_ .;�:,. ,;>�t +��v� ,_;y {t.?e �M . �� •� r t: i. .-�'ti . ' 'S �r. �� r•* ��i• � �. �iL r��rs• �h x y�+- O!�' �in F.r. �'''1fiPt � .!�n�t1�'�5.+�"� ,�•,�f�.r �`�. 'PT:'� r�y� . C {�f 4�'� �. . /rJ.;•, � � i�, _ . ., . .�o.�t11,".�4A . ,.�i ��°�� '.� � r>�,'� ; "�, s ,'' a�'�.i� �1.� ' -,r�. ,,�, �,;sy`r4'v�+� °.R;� � �� ,�� "• ,:�F ��;`;. �.,�' r'�C p r�: �y... '�� i,v�� .�` ! .�� , .�.• f� ,•��f � : ;�, �'�: ' r v��r'��`�1�� `,'t::•�v�� j J;%�� .i3 _',:F ,,, _ � t� �^l��•,'�� Ju�r� `�: � _ �.� ' .N� �� . ,ay 'C'�f�� ... .��'"7� ��A j��Y�•�' .F,.�``,•?f t�f �• y�� ?4!'�� f.,. �� '�,y+�� : �� ' �f� ;'��' �.j ` � �titi. : +�y'��, iiL�,1` t. ��w ,j� . � 1 �.' b. � . ♦�• j � .,;�., ,�r. ' ��',�ql�u ,�� ' �' , . � `t �,4;��/,� ,-_�= � rl -'a�"t�;�q� .Jti �,��' .� •{', � _. . °. :•. ,I%�. . � ' � ,?�" � �,•�,,. .. , , 1 •. . r � �•,�^ '�. � �� .fr� �S � �� i ��1� �..T'�'Al�� i4 �� ,�-+ a � � �'. . � � �o M a '�':� r �� ',� y 1 y�'. $'L.. -�, ' s./�J � �' � I��oi . 1 � 7i� - ' y ��',� , '�� . � ,� � � ' ��+-'� � ' :Z r J�'� � .� � `�,� �' � -r-��,�•�yy � w�'`' '�1 ��''�I,r! * ,' _�.`.'i!�'a.. � ��_. Yl `}�(, �t: f �Y � •� A �� ti .. . a 3., � PHOTO 3: Erosion along Ball Creek �' ,�j ,.' �#:�.::it f� ,i F �`�. x; L<. . � � � � 4 • � i L .fi 1 .�'�'. 1 ,.{ � kx � �t �r� s, T� f; � � �, T�r ti , lf.s��:�'�; l!�'�#��. � Y �} ��f 'a�A.. .' t �s�� t�5 � I"��+r3,{'�� I � ... f 1 ,t� 7�. - r �q._.��... . „�",�r�P -�-�Ys,�� '.� n+:.: ,r �.�;: �j1.'. ' 1.,'� ��,�� ....11 I'��. �� .,.y� � � � . ,Y#� �� ''�. �, � y� �- � i4► ct'+� ' `'. �y��i ;� � . � .roL �� .�� `f: rFl��: . �,. t; Y t . � �Dt+'7 ..�•�� f't�A. ft �{� •.�+` 1 1 > ' �y�J1 y(1 , \1➢'�J� � , ��, �.. �r wc�.. , �• � R ' ... . F.r'}�� ,.� ,.��yt �1�� .� �ia�� ,�"�'��'1d�� '�r ��.,.y�a.._�de � � . � °'� i 1 ��" x p ��; � hw :.t''�r . ♦. F�yr .�,3� �Y�""�l ,F �� "i'y��i, � i,x� i'�.�` -,�c �°1 f. #:i -� y � L:'�`Y,�,.�� '`1 p t ,-'t""�j � `i�a�.. r � J. �a��.- t'_.••t�� ,��. ; - ..�. - i � �S. I � '��' ,,�� M .��S � r � � � ^'�'�Y�+ �,�1�.`'A �P: �.�Ea.:7��(',�,`Ry. ?'j� F�i. .• �f.i ��k, :�.. ' �"�t '�`*R�M'�,5 � r'�j�}>�T.S'+�4,�-,�/c�.'_'r '�y�. , � ��` W �.�.��,.i�JS-;� i ��Yr ^�� 7 f �it',^fi ,1C �'�(V^ .z . sn�� *'+5, �`�' :.�3,'� 1 ��j, 'C ° �t� r� .�J� �� !Y; �L �y�j, �d�� ,L� .�. . s � �i .�� a S��.�.q.,�,St':� w yi -. �a.J^.�{� ��. ,. [ �.- �1 � '.^��''•�R/''� ,,, ....,e,-.��`�e °i � s� .. �; r' X iK t d �� .I, "� � •y�yy� ��x'� ��. s 5�.-�4��1�9��%:��C. } 1�t � �;, j�`�[�. "�{�y-- '�;��,�j�,�r`a i�"��`e'a�' .,�= � � . . '�' . ��"�` �� L-ti"�J'°f Y``r,�`c'�"�+r� +�ly.,�'� . `ti5 ,�, � < 3.t y�.—�4�,'�t tr �``�~•`y' �"�y,�+1i� , r '\, - *� �,��'� @"�.w�. '`� a� �� y � p •��t�(.�``'�{, 1 ♦ � �. . } t �` 4 � ` %�`� FS � v� ,} l�J► � �. �.T a�-c �; j,��y I^F�-�.��/�P,1 1�4�"'�+ '�b=�F il \1''qT.��: Y. Y�.l'j�. . ' y�� /V,�j�,y�p .' +f/'Y✓ ��Y.�u �. 11'!�� '• �'4't�,. i�°j�-.� . a . � _YF .ia�1��IIC7.�tti�t%�� . �}`�,,, •7U�� " PHOTO 4: Concrete Weir "`o-ro� - Pdxrui �nnPOCx,�ar svRr�r I �,a;,°�.�_,,,,_ ��,� � , � YbM e � rz � � .Ra rv � �Y ��[Gr a4C Pv ''� T.LY LOT 900 '�Mw1oMD .. � nM��r��aliF��m��rnr�s�a�./+�r.o I .1KPI.M'AGVn,'O C1'nG�K!iY1D/WRw CCY.w.S . � ��sY[ e� /bB111N Y . ]uPe-I� ___-_ __ .__ N n- i j _ �� . e � � - � ° .� i ..R,,,...��,.,�.,,..,mn � : , ,"`.-�.:., � ' � � �, , ' ' ;�� `�:.�:�::,, � � ' � ' ;�,-.��:.�, � • . t ' � ` _ . . - � � /, ; arail.r -- ---�^°-.� � � � , /� ��. r a� �r �r .��.,«�, � � �_ , � � �� _.�.,n.,...�. �li �� , � � � � - • � t , I %_� .....,,, ..,. � ' . � �a,.w,� �, � . . } �r� � �� t � • � � t 4 � 1 •`� . . _ . , �' � t '' °`°�ss�o:� � „W,',��,.�,��r,�..,.� �� y��r��1, I 1_ � ,:so`s��«+ ° �� .a.�mm� / , .�� . � �,�..�q<,� + � c ,i �Y��"I y.os mtlon.emm /%� �r�l' I� t ✓/ � � � . ... � a.�o.arr.ws.`m..w..�..aexo.. + ,' I . i j �! i' i . + � � -� . �� ^�„��: . � �.,�w.,_� � � =a tt„ , .�. �I � t r , , w . . � � � � ' + , j • „ ' - , , � . - . . . ,. ._ , � �, • .. • • . . . « . . . � �� , .. . , � - �� ' � , - _ • ,.. � , ,.s., •.. ,.._�...._ , v � , W..._... _ � � r . - , ,..� , - . -- -- — . ,�� ._.. , - r .1 �9; - - --- - _ ' _��-" _-� i 4� �� - _ r�. _ " _ -- � ~`. .. �'C� __ -e.x._ ti,_ _ _ _ - �-t � _ _. _�i�-y-_ - _ _ __ _ - __ �E -'�r. _ _ _ _' .. ..�/ * .� ^ .„. \- _ ;+:r • ..... __— , ' �i \~� ��., _ � - '�t,.,. i+ �_.. ..�°�__ E.�.-3W � "�:, � �+{.L K��Y i��n - :N o I��,�Q�,bl�� .�s.t+-� � � o n� M �,� 31�f M' �'" s ar�G�[q� _ ��;� � �A��f�� '-°?`� ; - ��-�C�. �• � � � i . i ' ! - a.:;� � I'� . � . . . �, i'J,f=� i � i �F ' i1�: ��,,- - � ..r . ,L� . : . .:: � Na�.'F:: G43'� , , _ � - , .�a; � ��f�� a 1'�. , � U -�,.�: 1 :�a v��k�vZ �/` ' , i � :`� , � �.: � ,� � ��-� �,�r-�� 'E�F'voT � ��' % � t ` (,, - �Na� L.1 !'-7 �I; �-� �£:�;.. � ; � �:� � ��- _�4 �� : ; _� i ';�� G'r�r�.�.onti- � �� -: QG G�. / � � � / i � y/ � � ..-� S�.J� S c�t�.. ��£'`'';'. � � i i ��//��, � �. , £�t�7 � � �"x ; � �/ i' � • �JtAK� '.�'� '�� , ;t.i,' � ' , . �[> ' . �- : o r�� jr 3i,� +�!c.�. � � j . � �� `,� � � :� � w' -� rJ1/a�G� � ��`-� �� vr � � �� a� I.� • .+li��7LrZ' .'_'�{ .:�. yc �� ,��0 6 �a - � � ;� � �.� � � � . _ . .. _,. . F � . __ , 1 4 {-� : _ . �t�• _.�_.. . -['._ , _ -_ � r , �� " F ' � � F�� Vi-�� P1C� , ; j i � � j i �t31'�/� . '` F � �t � e_ � �� i OF �'.�� .�t��1� � i _•�b ,a r�,� �...� s�*►'� ��s ; ; = �� : � : r-��.�'�. . . � i � i i ; Y. � � , ��,� � �" �J v�t- wUf�►� fAb��c.t � � xcr,n�� -�z-��..1�, =�¢{ .. , ; ' � � � K _i � � ' � } 1� . �' � F�7A�i" �E��-o� S� :� � rs��.o� , '1��'-� � 1—�}`'.� 11J/�1��-- U� � �'�' 2 0 � . ' ; s�'-� <�-" � � � : : : . -�� :. � � �.�] � : . : L��a�� [�/J� • ' E�Y �*� � . .. . � . �� . � ({�}� � \/. � , • � ' /� f i£ i '�� mY . . . . . . . . . . ' / . i!° � � � . . . . . . � . _ . i . . i . �r c Y _ J � . . ' I . . . � t1 y i.`.: 1� �, � � _ . . � , y.,t'� ! Y.�. � � . � . . . . r _; i _ _ ' �h'Y f� _ ! � . - � ' �' � 4�v.� � � . . . . . . . � . . /� L L�`,^x. '• . . . . . � . I . . . S �'3�� -}�� t� �i��c.7�E �;, Department of Fish and Wildlife � : �•� ": :��1 s�: . .;�,� Narth Willamette Watershed Distriet ��;�.' .�,�` I833Q NW Sauvie Island Rd. v:�., ° �a" Theodore R.Kulongoski.Governor �-��'�.��'• Portland, OR 97231 Phone: (SR3) 621-3488 x 32 FAX: (S03) G21-3Q25 OREGON � � FiM i Whd111e W�� Tom Ar�cher P8S Enny"uieering�d Environmenta[ 13'FO Main St Vancouver,WA 98660 Subject: Carfiet and B�i Creek F�ish Presence at Gerber HQ_ Mpr_ Ar�', On Marc�h��'You, !, rePreserrtatives from eleart Wafier Servioes, and employees of Ge�r met to discuss options fiw stabilizing the bardcs of Cartef and Ball Creeks. Curten#1y the�table cneek banks have resulted in damage to the �J�P��'9 tot 'ihe site is loca�ed at 7420U SW 72"�, near the oor�fluenoe af Carter and Bal{ Craelcs,west of where I-5 meets 217, ak the Gerber Kriif� Company Headquarters. Sin�oe�hat time, you trave requested that the Or�egon DeRartrner�af Fish and VWldlifie make a Matiine M�gfa[�cy Fish(NMF} Detennination for the sifie. This stream does not have anadromous fish d�to urbaniz�ttion and doMmstream tx�l�erts. Tt►e stream is completely cu(verted dvwnstream of the site irx approximately .5miles. Ou�r maps do ind'icate p�ese�'toe a�NMF witt�itt these two tx�eelts; with�n tkie projec�eurea Data is not attached ta this oov�erage. Hcywever, i�is this status is still valid it would be e�ec.ted that presence would be from a remnant poputation af wtthroat trout. !f there afe anY�P��- Thank you, t E�Z�.`7�� VtI't E. $IfYt(C10r1S �8b1�Q101U�tSt 503-621�48$X 32 PBS 1370 MAIN STAEET V/WCOWER,WA � (�890-/331 FA% (360)BB&8064 WILLIAMS CONTROLS SITE BOUNDARY N B95020""E 4. 1 1 - - - - i I)�I APPROXIMATE ��j�/ �� Illl� WORK�AREA � ,�' //� i) ' � // + t I� i W / 'i I Q / l a / a / j j - � G�.1 + t � / II � I-5 ODOT �1 W O ��// I II � RIGHT-OF-WAY� � ry EXISTING BIIILDING iii ~ �I; � � � � '� �i zN � � � Q W INDUSTRIAL 'o �1 a I 'U 3 ¢ PARK p �(I � W � � °o i 1li � �I a p E'"'- � � � �l � ' W ► � � � � % i�,,,,. t ,�� w a j �� ,,,, t ,i/ ; % /// -�/� % /, � � � i O� / + ��/�� ~ / / � /j��/ � yE%ISi1NG / �/ �� o � -- — - ---- � ---_--- --_� ��_f�C,, � 1, O � � _ ��———_ � _-=- =t=——=_——� —�--/� �'��\ \ si� � j�-- _��------� -3�8:ri�U0 W�'6@-2�----- �_ I � , .- \�� PLAN SIiE BWNDARY � � / � � V —__� 7—� � \Ir�_��. � — _ \�/ �---------�� — _ 1 APPROXIMATE \\� � LIMITS OF ————�_J � WORK AREA y �`�/ o�. �anooi wx DMB nm TA INDUSTRIAL PARK " "'"'"Z°°° � �.,� � - -- l/— -- - --- - - - - �p / ' w � O 15' 30' 60' ` _O.O v � SCALE: 1'=30' SHEET 1 OF 2 � CIVIL ORAWINGS � n H.M te si � � � �.��;�^ � "�� PARTlAL TOPOGRAPfIY SURV�'Y 13101rWN8TREEf �,wi�,-.�� MAM11 MR IMO O� 4NE. d�b.i/ar �� T.U'LOT JAO V�R'wA �rrwa.m w¢ 91W)CON/IENOilMFAS)OUARJWf1�ACMOYlAFASlfY/AM!(A (3E0)WO-�331 ahoibe N.INF. o�.YCAqV�2�ONM91i i SO'/M RAMi!MFSI GY A( FIV( MR(.LLtsle ll'M6YMf bn cY�NMA'NGAY CCCNIY,SlA1F O�GM[L[M SLAIE 9QI PFhCClHO. ��4 I'�N' 1 G�1 XV6-II j � �� 1 a � B6VCNYARK � „t YY Y' l I ia� a•.... •w ��.. .�w� •-- •-- �° LdiC!'ND 119"'°�'�;w°'°'".r�.,'°'��- _ M � ' � �y �/ .... .�,.rs�'.`�°w o � + � - �,.,.a,,.'..°.."r'T mR.,�..w,�.�o"°' ..,, d yq bi% 4' ..r.. � � r' �.. / ! Y ' `\ - an..,. v �� / �a -r •° - � o, t � - •r Y6Rf7C.IL DAf7/V �. �„ Y —awaA,�� `�`_��,..� �� —��. � m �. I C/� + •-� .-�.�..v�4 " W j t � —�--.m.��..� Y � Y -_,��:.w,ri S/7S B�iVG7/YA/PA' ,r� Y � .�., .'w,.e.�.°`"-'-"'r� "°"�i...w � 1� M � Y TR66S ww.en.a>r.�em.N th .� y W ,,. � z ,�y. Y_ ..�. ° '.�eolm .......� ...• ei � � O � � O• ✓• �/� � � � ,,,_ vrczvm'�ua ` 3 I-i � Q Y '1" F� •� � ' � +� '�. � ` /Lj � 't. \, �; 1 � _ � . 4�i � n� S;,� a�v.a r.� � f ` , I M1 � W .y,. ,Y .,.� ..._� �,� 11 Ko.�wm u�.,e.e....,�..�..,»,.rm..��.�� ' � \J 7 �. :1 , '—`y�....�. wa w�m�ron y�..r.a a.icr�o.r..v mo.m.v '�,'I� W � � .�. i� • � ��.�,,.,.�,�.� j � � O � »,,.. v,e,.�m...,a.m.a '+ O ,�, .... _ ';;�� _.I��, .,�� d�....�.a....o.�,,,.�,a, t � a/ N -, , .� _ ,�,„� � W � ... _ � - �• � r.. + � r �. � r r ~' ,,,,.,,,ox�, � � �i '! ��• � � Y• �I s� �� •� •� W V ° .,. . .... e ._. ,�, � ,,. .,, �► � a ,'�-\ ._ .� y `' ' e ,,.�. .,. ,.., � �. �� . ��, � �.. � � � / � °�"� .,.. .�- � ,� ,,. "" ° - , _� , .� .:� .�, + � "" ..., ,° •-- ... ._. y�,;-- y .m.�I .�.., .v. .�.. • �� .��s� y^; " � �_ .�, y�f "w''- ••. -� �, -•,, . .., , . .� 7 " _ __ a. . e�y� aq� .w • . .� � __.. "' .� — —� — — \_-- °� . . -' �"°"- .x� � ?., - a -' - _ — '_ • ., _ �''-l- r � —� - ". -: 1,,,,�.. . .. . _ ��.w _ .! ' �"' _ ! � � n�rut '� ' - __ _•• -ri' ` �'^° .. ��-�° N , �;--r-�� , S :w .. � �—�- ---- Q� � • W TOPOCRAPHIC - ~�W ... '� �-�� • ,,, ... � y ' 4 r z��.. �\�, a'� SURVEY �� , � -. =W' � �� an.om nnm TA MAY 1006 � �§ 1i � J / ' ; � ,5 � � C0.1 � SCALE: 1'=30' SHEET 2 OF 2 �S CML DRAVNNGS � s � L�-Z��G _ , ovov� � � ?ECEf�'ED P�AN�lI��a � JAN 31 2008 �'�'Y��:s�.a�►� Marie Hagenlock Gerber Legendary Blades 14200 S W 72"`� Ave. Portland, OR 97213 Emily Eng, City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Emily: Please find enclosed copies of the Emergency Authorization from the Department of State Lands and the Clean Water Services Amended Service Provider Letter for your files. This is to inform you we have completed all required work on our Stream Bank Restaration project in accordance with the U.S.Corps of Engineers, Department of State Lands, and Clean Water Services. If you have any questions or concerns please contact me at the office phone number below. Best Regards, '."l �3'L"' � Marie Hagenlock Safety & Facilities Manager 503-403-1251 � !.� �: �' , Gerber Legendary Blades A.AfiSNAl1SBRANDSCOMPANY 14200 SW 72nd Avenue � Portland,OR 97224-8010 W W W.FISIURSBMNOS.COM 503.639.6161-Mnirv � 503.684.7008-Fnx � www.gerbergear.com � File Number . CleanWater� Services 06-�2395 Our commitment is clear. Clean Water Services . AMENDED Service Provider Letter Jurisdiction Washington County Amended April 30, 2007 Map &Tax Lot 2S112AA-00300 Original August 23, 2006 Site Address 14200 SW 72nd Av Applicant GERBER LEGENDARY BLADES Tigard, OR 97224-8010 Address 14200 SW 72nd Av Portland, OR 97223 Proposed Activity Streambank Stabilization Phone (503)403-1251 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R80 04-9). YES j NO I I YES � NO j Natural Resources � � Alternatives Analysis j � � Assessment(NRA) a a I Required � � a Submitted � (Section 3.02.6) - -. _._.. _ ___ ---__ .- --- -- District Site Visit ❑ ❑ I Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis ❑ � Date: X i � ----_ ___ ___ � ____ ___ -- , Concur with NRA/or X � � Ter 2 Alternatives Analysis X submitted information � � � � � � Sensitive Area Present a ❑ T+er 3 Alternatives Analysis ❑ � On-Site Sensitive Area Present � Vegetated Corridor Off-Site a � � I Averaging � � � _ _—._ _ Vegetated Corridor a ; ❑ � Vegetated Corridor ❑ I � Present On-Site E Mitigation Required � � ---- -- - _ � Width of Vegetated verisbie o eo se teec � On-Site Mitigation ❑ � a � Corridor{feet) � ; Condition of Vegetated � � � i I oe9raded � Off-Site Mitigation X I Corridor � ( � � � � � _ , ----- - ___ � i Restoration Planting Plan ; � Enhancement Required ; �X � � � Attached I a � � I , ; -- � __-__ . � I ALL on-site VC to � < Encroachment into j I � � I Enhancement/restoration � be enhanced � Vegetated Corridor ❑X � � completion date � concurrent with site ' ` (Section 3.02.4) i � i � development _ _ ___ __ j Type and Square Footage 77 sf for Envlrolok Geotechnical Report ! ❑ ! a � of Encroachment Vegetated Wall � required ; } , _ ---_ Allowed Use j ❑ � � Conditions Attached ; a � (Section 3.02.4) I. ; � , _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ - - _, ------_ This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. Page 1 of 8 File Number 06-002395 In order to comply with Ciean Water Services (the District) water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon pepartment of Environmental �uality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.3. 2. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the vegetated corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.4. 3. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the vegetated corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per app�oved plan. During construction the vegetated corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by 5ection 3.02.5 and per approved plans. 4. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Division of State lands(DSL)and US Army Corps of Engineers(USACE). The applica�t shall provide the District or its designee (appropriate city) with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. ACOE NWP 2006-40476; DSL EA 38U14-RF 5. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. 6. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for Erosion Control, in accordance with the CWS Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 7. Prior to const�uction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the District or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.8. 8. The District or City/County may require an easement over the vegetated corridor conveying storm, surface water management, and/or sanitary sewer rights to the District or City that woutd prevent the owner of the vegetated corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. 9. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with Section 3.13 of R&O 04-9. 10. Removal of native, woody vegetation shall be timited to the greatest extent practicable. 11. Removal of invasive non-native species by hand is required in all vegetated corridors rated "good". Replanting is required in any cleared areas larger than 25 square feet. 12. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by the District, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary,obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. Page2of8 File Number 06-002395 SPECIAL CONDITIONS . 13. The vegetated corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall extend from the edge of the sensitive area to existing impeNious areas(approximately 0 to 25 feet). 14. For vegetated corridors less than 50 feet wide, the entire vegetated corridor shall be equal to or better than a "good" corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.7,Table 3.2. ALL on-site ve�tetated corridor to be enhanced concurrent with development activities. 15. Enhancement/restoration of the vegetated corridor shall be provided in accordance with R80 04-9, Appendix D. 16. Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of enhancement/restoration activities. Enhancement/restoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements(R&0 04-9:Appendix D). 17. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the vegetated corridor shall be removed. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native trees and shrub species. 18. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction,the applicant shall provide the District with the required vegetated corridor enhancemenUrestoratlon plan in compliance with R&O 04-9. 19. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with Section 2.11.2 of R&O 04-9. If at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80% survival level, the Owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the iwo year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. 20. Performance assurances for the vegetated corridor shall comply wilh Section 2.06.2, Table 2-1 and Section 2.10, Table 2-2. 21. Protection of the vegetated corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provlded by the installation of permanent signage between the development and the outer Omits of the vegetated corridors. Thls Service Provider Lette�is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan is attached. Please call(503)681-3613 with any questions. ,�"".�y-'� ,�� > r�"��{'�G%C/ � �� Julie Wirth Environmental Plan Review Attachments ( 5 ) Page 3 of 8 ---._ __ --- —. — __-- .—_. — t � �� _ � ct.7�S � r'Lci:s: . 5�� Cw� .�r�� c.�f'li�ti�,�,�`� 3, N a.,J S�5 �,- <«r��,�k� �/e��fr��) l'orr�,k,� C�1Ci''Dal��.r�e �� ` T NTS�F on- s,�. ✓��h2•e� l'c.-�.�� n L.a n c�� ycr Cw s �- a ��. � u.n a r 7 7�'_$P.c ��n1S �J��:.'h/P� li'�u��✓v�r� �� -1z,. ✓��It.—l"e� Cc.�r�J� locct�l�/1S -- - -- -- --- �,�w.n: - --, ,,.,. _ _ __ __ --�--�:/� , � � ;-= � �' ar,wr+a aRea - � � .� � , ---- -----� � i --"— --"--—---"'J I �.. —"— `.{ I.� �� EIIG�1ltER�4�;Ar1i1LNVIA�Y1r.:EY1M � � ' Ij'�\\\.: I F�• '• � 131CA14iN91fiE:� �\1�\ _'-_� . ��, ' � VANGp/VFH WnSNilk:l011 Y�R�iU 1 \ \ _� � J�` � RqNE.(76�1�'nJJll . •� _ � � �I �. �I f.vt.I�eolae-�oe+ ' . i �/ I.EGENf2 —_ � i'.� �V� imv��,�.�e«�w�, . � � . ' � � �/� �1., r i9 � BENCHMARK � � \ . . � � WETLANO — 1 � % \ �.ll �.I 1 � '1�/ t { I \ � . AC�INTY/111PACT AREAS — r/ �I I. �1 '� I � y,/� � Ar�A' . CR055 SfCT10N lOCA710N I \ '1/. ��,I I \ .r._�._.. . p�pN�qY MIGH WAT[RI,ME � � �' \ Ew51x�c Cor+rourts ��......,. ,... � \ '(X,` I � y} _ . � , ��1��-�" ; '� � , , � I � � e , � , 8 � �� , ;�,� � � ; e � ,� , � � ;� � 8 � / � � G�J��R G�b c c+o 2 S�R,��.,– � �� j �� ; � ,-�� Approved ��'�l '� �� ;� i �" > � . ' i/ `'\ Clean Water Servicos • U�� .� � � �� _ � W � �� .,��.�r,,.�Aw 1 �,,i Re e,,.> 2 �� \` ;; '' ;I � C� Q °4 / � By�_Date �-3D.0} J� �`�; � -� �, c z � p � � i !�»tt �d SPC a'�l�arl,rne�r ) � � i� • � �' i � F" :.� '' o� .� C �'I � ' t_.� i � � 3 � t � \ �,._ _ '� ,�\��. �� i W N . t k,)� `��.��T�� 1�� .--- �^,�" � �"� ; -_a ; � � ,�+i , — ��'_ �T�� /.j:� i J � 1.i 1 J � !�-, //�-STUDY MEA �•�� +I �f�_ �J� %/ � `� � �-l='t �--' ` -1.��_ --------------------------- --- ----------------- - ' ;�:.: 1 'r— .,� —/— --.-- � �� `1 ,-.. l �. ,� �,�- - .�...'_• :si' . . i k �. I l.- ' ' ' ... . � , -.. . . .._._...... .s:ur' . �.:,e;�\ . I � ��i\ �""'....._..._._...w...._�...�.. _ _ ....."� . � •.�_ � 3[C GClF,r_ _,_,_,, � _ 1 Cr�� C' , ~!a ,.�.� I I y •�� . -�o rq �t, ` •� .�� .:�.,« � . I P I �y — �_ . �_ . _" J � ..'_. . . .. . _ i \ •\) ' `••,�•• -�1 1 , \�� —71 , __. _ . :.. • �..• Ij . . . . . ; I .-.____...... _ . .- WETIAND AREA*�iW SF- ��' i; t �------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------=_—�"__-------�I NOTES: � ; 1.SURVEY PROVIDED BY STATEWIDE LAND SURVEYING.INC. p�.n«•.a� fIGC�.RI'. j 2.WETLAND BWNDARY SURVEVEU DY STATEWIDE UNO SURVEY�NG,INC SUPPIEMF.NTAL P01NT LOCATtON iUd7�UU? � '�'�� COLIECTEO BV VBS USMG TRIMBLE CEOXT GPS UNIT WITH$UBWETER POST PROCE331NG ACCURACY. _ _ _ _. �,�� 3 sc.��E. r�w 3.SEE FIGURE�FOR CROSS SECTIONS AND PROPOSE�CONTWRS J�%��'� � �� ' -� -- _. �° �Z oaa� i � • �., ��`'. ��: � `�'=�. ��w,..��. . 3� �� i. .t . i •r � .. '` .p 1 �� Q � •.'^/� . . � � _ � ,'..� � � �,, , „�' ,;,�`�•� ��,�+' . � �� .:; a�', , U ��},ivs� — 'z{ 4 �.� �� •�'�� ` ` ' - Twp .�, �. t �i 1� 4 r'M 8„ �; . ,. ��1� "�'{'' � � � N\ ��' � ,� , ` C'+�hC'�{ �1.~ . � !^v�+ � n'a``,��'F",��it' ��4x�`5��.° fF,�� • �"'"". �� '.�. �3 '' �.�� - ��=� � v►' ,� , �---- � _ �� , ,;�,�..� .� '�,.�,+; � � �'�` ' * •, ! ..."+.:,.,....,....._,. �' ` £i' v �r l� 1 � , ,y � � ` � j � Y'�vN - ' . i �.1�y� � I f�!i 1 �! e D!/� � � , �i E�� r .,. � . . +�www�,..- ._..�__....� l j' .. �o ;,' :.t�� .1•,Nl , �.�. .�..� +,..+...�... � �� ,li r� �x � � . - ;.;� — � � �- � •�3l��. � °' .Cl �r; °� '�� + _ N� �,� � '',�: ' °! �_ p 4? � • m 4 �' � ' ' , 1,. of0i C.�.. ; V�Il . 3 � � � "a1 �.� �' LM� -t �( �r.�.� �. �� r ` _ ; � B Da - � 76 a c 1 N 4 .� } , � y . � , m � -r �•"�'�' .�..� � � n r� � � f� 1' W3 � i � '�[�1 t.1'� � 3 � m � 3 "� �J'0 � ; °.+�` _r 4 . r/ � a ni Q �� ,� � �V��/�/� /'1 lC� �' '� ,�c �`IS �3 � ' �� aPProved _._ .��; � , . .� . � —� ° -- t,lean Water Services � � � � j �,• �� " . �--� I�=�,�v��c+�rn-�-.. +-•l Pla��F�'►t� �. � �.�I ° -� � 'C�y��ate_y-30 �,,� -: • . � � Z - • � i L�^ � � � i �ii -- A. .��r ir=� • Gil � S�7L R�s�t/►��tr�_I ty''1 v ,� �y C i (J� � ��' ��' /,�.? � l ' .1� ' � C�� 1 �. r n� ' ,�+1� _� >,., � � �� , _ _ . ' 1r- � -� I W�� ' . � � . . 'F �_ �.' y D `' �� :�.� '. •� � +� �"` . � ��. � � Z'� �r� � , �, . . , ��,. .N� 3� y . • `�.�f y7.?�,��-. *•i � � � I .I ��`� '��,`�� :�� j� �_ � 1 Fi . �..� -t_ � 8 j - .�( +� ,y ■ „ 1 'g ' �' � � � •,/� r ~ � �• ►/: �` ; � `� � I � . _`�Jy"� � � � � ; �r �. ...:�_ �s__. � q f` - d ' j� zr� +. �'��_ ii,�w,,�, - �,, �, -- . . � ��-�� ,fi � � . �, r "��i +�., ,�- �� , - ,..�.+ �'��-!.+ � ° i �.� . � ;� ,` `��G�i��`t�z�' � ��' �M ., �t}.°x ��'�; , . , �� .. '_ f � v J 1 .... ,, � . .r--,,,�,.,., -��;�- �-� �,��P � ♦� �.qJ. � .o+` �.I � t�I .`�;a C -1L..'7 'L `. .. *kl �.. � ` ++;, . y ,. � -r F, m,(`t,`.,�`�..�,� �, . ,��,.� f�,i'�r� .,,�'�,�� ! . �� . � r ;r'm t ! Vi, c�, 4' .+-'�4� �w�..�. � - �...,�.m....�� . iy ., o � _.. . � _ .� . .� o.� � Y � , •_ N � ". . _ --r r '' �` `„`"�>n� 1 i ' . � �. �. . .�.�. ..�....��.�. � � �_ . . __ . . �- �� -'5..:. � � r i � P`°'°"" WATER QUALITY SENSITlVE AREA AND VEGETATED CORRIDOR MAP FIGURE � �oa��.002 Gerber Legendary Blades oa�: 14200 SW 72nd Avenue � (,'� .luiy 2006 TIGARD,OREGON AREA A: 13' LONG, 4' HIGH (ilrt�J f�(t �� QO �• ' <APPROXIMATE) A r ��w�3 t� ��A/N pp oved � • . Clean Water Se(yices , , �-�f �.�v�rcti��v�-�-�.1�..1 '��uo� 1 tU�tw - -- � �\ ,i`�` �Y - a e � - v -v ' . '` �V �,.�t1 —AREA B: , � � - � � ,`� \ ��(�1 49' LONG, 3' HIGH teh�Pd Sf� !}t"t�eef�.v�w. �jZ y ,� ,� ; '��11� � CAPPROXIMATE) � �l � ��,�� ,. . 7I � ,,, ,O . , W�� ) � � � � I . � � ' � . � �� '� �� / � , '� ,��1 i`�.oh � � '� �O � ; � • '� .ltl � l '�i�"�' �'�� 1 I�� r; ll�l % 2 � � � `��'�))``� � � _ `� ', l� 1 ' � - 1'ij� � r� ��'�' � \ '�1 %/ , (� � nR_n c: 33' LGNG, 4' HTGH / , I � ; CAPPROXI�4ATE) Gp !'LL.R � / � I� � ! ' � \ ` I I ' . c. � Il ii � , ; ' ' ' ` \ ! � j �r�i rj / � �� —AREA D ' �� I� � 22' LONG, 5' NIGH ' \ - � i o ' � i <APPR�XIt•1ATE) / j � - i I $ '\ ' /,. al I I AREA E� �� 74' LONG. 6' N?GH 6 � V I 2 � �� CAPPROXI�•1AT�) � 2 � _ " � � ( a � ` � �� , t � ` � , � � � � � a �'�o� � , � , �� g ' � ' �^ � , � � - �, - , ! / `\ ; : � ! , i � /\ LEGEND y �` � ' , O1 ENHANCEMENT AREA (.A Il an-5� VC��''�� • � 8 � � 0' t0' 20' 40' O2 IMPACTED AREAS-(AREA BETWEEN TOP OF SLOPE m AND EDGE OF ASPHALT) � SCALE: 1"=20' (25.12'SOUARE FEET TOTAL) � � PRaecr a FIGURE ' 70477.002 GERBER LEGENDARY BLADES � 14200 S1V 72NA AVENUE 4 � P B S APRIL 2007 TIGARD,OR�GON / \, i " ` I I � AREA E� '� � I 74' L❑NG, 6' HIGH �� (APPRCIXiMATF> . v ? _- - i i � � 2 /� � I ► 4 �c � -�...' � �i . ' 1 � e � a � ,,I � _ 'o} , ` - II �"�'s"�-.-..=r� ^�'c C5 _G'O �� , - ' I I : i ' APAr � � i: � Cle Water, ic�,5 � . �1�\ � 6hv��r �►M � u v►��J / ' �y tP, ��- � '� � � _• \ � �`\\1, � �� ' �� 4 I 7l Gl Y �Cr�rl�-,, � ;' - � �r �1��; � �� ;,,;'I ��►E;� � � '��+ l� - �r � .,�,� �,i '� � �. � � ,�,i,,, � z / � ! �, � i - � !�i,�� i �. � ; � I, � ,��',; , , , �ii�W .� � , � ' �yl,�;i;i � � �, / +� lo� � '� ��. _ ''+i I�'��b' W 1 .1 � '�Qi,� " , ' , 2 i� ` AREA F: C.P. IY.L.P. / 1,, i j +ii I�I,��, � 55' L�NG. 7' HIGH �P �� f �� '�I�'� � (APPR❑XIMATE) i ' � , � �,�,�1�;,i .,, � � '� �' {�(°�` � , w' ; �r � ; � � � � '�� '• , �� y 1 s � � 1i Q - / / i : o —� _ _- - �; f i l/ � , � , j � " �` �! � � �I �i AREA G: i , � . � ��./'�' �t �� I l� 31' LONG, 6' HIGH ,� r �, � 1�� <APPR�XIMATE) � ' , �� ,I: � � ��; �� I � , %Y� � ' ��!�� `� /�� , ,1 S � � � -- - - - ` j' J ` ' /� �I�� J 'J � � LEGEND � �g / \ 1O ENHANCEMENT AREA �N I f Gl�-5,�� V� �t; R' F'•i�lC� q�t�) n` / , 8 O2 IMPACTED AREAS-(AREA BETWEEN TOP OF SLOPE � 0' to' 20' 40' AND EDGE OF ASPHALT) _ (51.25'SQUARE FEET TOTAI) � � WETLANOS m SCALE: 1'=20' 0 � �� PROJECT# $ �04��.002 GERBER LEGENDARY BLADES FIGURE � P B S APRIL 2007 14200 S1V 72ND AVENUE 5 TIGARD,OREGON ' ' I " iyl ,� ji �� , � `�� , - � / l ,I f l . / - j ,/ ,� � �� --- - - _ _ - f �� '� ��/ /�� _ ,,± - . � I � �f '� f (� ��f ' � !�i + �,y i' . i' �f��J�' I � ��/ �� - � '� ll� �, � , . , 1 ;�� . � . , ; ,1;, , �- �� r \� y/ / � il . f �► �, ` ;i � � �- � ; J Y .� \ j � . `� � ./�/ �/�/ 3RELONG, 6' H. � ` / ,�F�/J� / ,/ (APPROXIMATE) _' ,L ' �, � ;�,�I� ,/' �� / . � � ' � G �� _�-, \A R �> �,, `�',�. ` ,/,•'/ /; AREA H� \ �_ � E�GE OF Evt;�E L � ` ,` 18' L�NG, 5' HIGH :;t��At•t$AhlK, ArPF�X.. �. ' �,:,��% � �` CAPPRQXIt•tATE) � i . � i , � ', —�RE� t. .. i i.' ; ��•�%i' r 29E LONG, 8' HIGH Z`� � f�t�G; G ilIt}i-i �ti> a�, '� y / •� L <APPR[]Xil•1ATF) ._..�--� � :-��r�i �1;: ,� ) ,>'' _-� �.Yy,�j,,y� - AREA J� ��..._ y � .r�r� �i� �. �. �. 18' LONG. 7' HIGH ; .� =�. � (APPR�XIMATE) .�... .� ��'�� S �l�. �Y J. W �Y �` �� ` � . /` � .. � _.�,_��. . _:.t. .'� W ��\�y\� 1� �Y �V �� ; '\ • �-� . . =-'..'..... / � ,�.\�\��5��:� --�(i:�`��• i t!•� _.�Y.__ W�� `_S.`w J� /�4] •i \� \ �•�'`' '�',,.��`a.�-%w�\ �� ,`�y� v��y �t•� .y. ' - � \ �� • ' _; �S•��Y �Y W\• Y � W�� c�1 a•� �\ ,y ..-. —l". ��_�:` - \ / _\ �'� ----� .y �. y v. '�y� `� . � � � � .� - �. � -•.��v - _. �'� ��, ��\ �- y w �. �w '�w`-.� y w y � ,�L� u;., J� .L �Y y \�y�\ \�� .y .y\�� _ -...��IJi v WORK AREA LIMIT w �v i• �W�'�:�,.� \ � ` � '��c• �i � �Y ��` ' � � -- — /�' � �G y w ��\ ��.\\w`� �_ '`y �. �i� ./� \ gJ� v� `\ -'�\\Vc_��W �Y ' �y `,...Gv � �W1S G/C �� . /� 7 � ( V' '� �, .V�, `�Y`��1� ` W�C, � .-r _ � \ _ �. . . .� C'�J��„! �Y . �L � —`L' •Y J� ``'\\_�'j. .. � apnro�ea � � �_ _ �� _� _ �_= . ;�__ _. �.� '„� -_.� ` _%/ �'lean - - _ �- �. � � � Water S�rv�:: ' __ �- _ ~, i : n .__ g �� L'rl v'»s i`l i�� t ( ��tr n /C(�.t.�jC� � - _�, � -•��.i�i� ,� � BY CI��— D�tr� �/-�� ..4, � �. � /1�1'12r��P �� 6��►'i C..,� �S ,'',5 0 � � LEGEND � /� 4 / \ O ENHAN EMENT AREA l $ " ��I! G�-5r�, dC fv� e�j� ��4c�J � � WETLANDS � 0' 10' 20' 40' r a � SCALE: 1"=20' � � PROJECT# g �oa��.002 GERBER LEGENDARY BLADES FIGURE � � P B S OATE 14200 S�V 72ND AVENUE � > APRIL 2007 TIGARD,OREGON " ' � regon Department of State Lands '` 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 � �l'e•5''� Theodore R.Kulongoski,Governor Salem,OR 97301-1279 (503}378-3805 , FAX(503)378-4844 www.oregonstatelands.us. March 8, 2007 State Land Board cLwooi3so�a Theodore R.Kulongoski GERBER LEGENDARY BLADES Governor ATTN: MARIE HAGENLOCK 14200 SW 72N�AVENUE Bill Bradbury TIGARD OR 97223 Secretary of State Randall Edwards RE: EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION FOR REMOVAL AND/OR FILL OF State Treasurer MATERIAL IN WATERS OF THE STATE THIS AUTHORIZATION EXPIRES ON MAY 7, 2006 • State Application No. 38014-RF • Ball Creek; Washington County; T. 2S, R. 1 W, Section 12AA, Tax Lot 300, City of Tigard Dear Ms. Hagenlock: This letter is an authorization for emergency purposes only. An emergency is defined in Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR 141-85-010(58)) as"natural or human- caused circumstances that pose an immediate threat to public health, safety or substantial property including crop orfarmland." Emergency letters of_authorization may be issued to protect existing shorelines or structures under immediate threat by flood or storm waters or for the prevention of channel changes that threaten immediate and significant loss of property. Your request to conduct bank stabilization work on Ball Creek has been approved as an emergency authorization under ORS 196.810(4). This authorization expires 60 days from the date of issuance. In the pertormance of the emergency work by you and/or contractors, the following conditions shall be folfowed: 1. Tom Murtagh (971) 673-6059, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife shall be contacted prior to the start of work. 2. The amount of material to be removed and filled shall not exceed the minimum necessary to alleviate the emergency circumstances. However, up to 413 cubic yards of material are authorized for placement/removal as needed. 3. Turbidity increases shall be kept to a minimum. Only clean, erosion resistant rock shall be used as fill. The work area shall be isolated and water pumped out of the temporary work area while excavating or setting structures. The contractor or person conducting the work shall monitor weather conditions and ensure that in-stream work does not occur during heavy rain events or in anticipation of such an event. � March 8, 2007 State Application No. 38014-RF � Page 2 of 3 4. The route and methods used to access the work site shall minimize damage and disturbance to the streambank, stream channel and riparian area. All appropriate Best Management Practices shall be used to prevent on-site erosion. Silt fences shall remain in place until plantings are set and the area is stable, or until early summer. 5. All work shall be done from the top of the bank unless otherwise approved by the Department of State Lands. 6. Any excavated material shall be disposed of upon upland. The material shall not be placed in wetlands, streams or other waters without the express permission of the Department of State Lands and the property owner. 7. Inspection of the work may occur by the Department of State Lands and/or Department of Fish and Wildlife or other appropriate agency following the emergency, and project refinements may be required by the Department such as: -addition of rock barbs or rearranging of riprap; -sloping the bank; -revegetation of the slope and/or bank top; and -other measures as appropriate to protect waters of the state. 8. The Department of State Lands retains the authority to temporarily halt or modify the project in case of excessive turbidity or damage to natural resources. 9. This permit does not authorize trespass on the lands of others. The permit holder shall obtain all necessary access permits or rights-of-way before entering lands owned by another. 10. Permittee shall defend and hold harmless the State of Oregon, and its officers, agents, and employees from any claim, suit, or action for property damage or personal injury or death arising out of the design, material construction, or maintenance of the permitted improvements. Any additional removal and/or fill work required after completion of the emergency work within the bed and banks may require a permit from the Department of State Lands. Please contact me prior to doing additional work to determine if a permit or other authorization is needed. For Disaster Recovery Assistance, victims need to apply through the National Teleregistration Center at 1-800-462-9029/TTY 1-800-462-7585. Please be aware that you must also receive authorization, when required, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before beginning construction (Tina Teed at 503-808-4384). In addition, you should contact your city or county planning office to be sure your project is in compliance with local land use plans and programs. March 8, 2007 State Application No. 38014-RF Page 3 of 3 � If you have any questions regarding this authorizatian or its conditions, please contact Carrie Landrum at Ext 285. Sincerely, ,'�� Z L� l � `�` '� , .. Michael Morales Western Region Operations Manager Wetlands and Waterways Conservation Division Oregon Departmen#of$tat� Lands ,.. .. ...,.., : . . . CLL:jed G:\W WC1AttachmentAwestLAS\Emergencies\38014-RF.doc cc: Tom Murtagh, Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife Tina Teed; Corps of Engineers, Portland District Alex Cyril, Department of Environmental Quality City of Tigard Planning Dept. Tom Archer, PBS Engineering and Environmental �Emily Eng - Gerber Legendary Blades Page 1 From: "Christy McDonough" <christy_mcdonough@pbsenv.com> To: <Emily@tigard-or.gov> Date: 1/2/2007 9:36:29 AM Subject: Gerber Legendary Blades Hi Emily, I am contacting you regarding the potential for an emergency permit at the Gerber Legendary Blades site in Tigard. This past summer we did some streambank stabilization at two spots along the creek. However, during the high water events this winter they have failed. The water levels and resulting erosion are currently threatening the adjacent parking structure and the sign. We would like to be able to fix this in order to protect the parking structure as soon as possible. What we are proposing is to install a vegetated wall along the streambank. The specific product we are looking at is called Envirolok (http://www.agrecol.com/cros/envirolok_page1.aspx). The total cubic yards is estimated to be between 200 and 250 cubic yards. The estimated length is 200 linear feet. What will be the most expedient way to permit this project? At this point, we are not sure whether or not there will be any modification to the paving of the parking lot. If there is, would this trigger stormwater upgrades? thanks, Christy Christy McDonough Environmental Planner christy_mcdonough@pbsenv.com 360.213.0444 PBS Engineering and Environmental Engineering � Natural Resources � Environmental � Health and Safety www.pbsenv.com <blocked::blocked::blocked::blocked::BLOC KED::http://www.pbsenv.com/> 1310 Main Street Vancouver WA, 98660 ph: 360.690.4331 : fax: 360.696.9064 DISCLAIMER: This message and any attachments are considered privileged and confidential and are intended for the sL2 2ao Co—�rU�'�o g ?�c:R..�� Oc.e Z � Zs�°� ;e �; ' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY N°{°� \ -�R-� ��l li��; PORTLAND DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS il_ � � POST OFFICE BOX 2946 PORTLAND,OREGON 97208-2946 REPLY TO September 28, 2006 ATTENTION OF: Operations Division Regulatory Branch Corps No.: 200600476 Ms. Marie Hagenlock 14200 SW 72"d Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Ms. Hagenlock: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received your request for Department of the Army authorization to place fill along the banks of Ball Creek as shown on Enclosure 1. The project is located at 14200 SW 72"d Avenue, in Section 12 of Township 2 South, Range 1 West, in Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Your project involves stabilizing two sections of bank on Ball Creek and removing an existing concrete weir. The primary method for stabilizing the bank will be reinforced earth, composed of lifts of native soil wrapped in filter fabric, which will then be planted with riparian vegetation (e.g., willow). A backhoe, operating from the adjacent parking lot, will be used to excavate a trench 1 foot below the low water level. Woven fabric will be placed along the bottom of the trench, followed by non-woven fabric and one-foot of'/4-inch washed angular rock. The fabric will then be folded back to enclose the rock and staked in place. Another piece of fabric will be placed, filled in with a six-inch lift of common soil, wrapped and staked. This process will continue until the soil lifts are level with the top of bank. At the top of bank, adjacent to the asphalt pavement a one- foot deep key trench will be placed and filled with common'/4 minus washed angular rocks. Finally, topsoil and native grass seeds will be placed over the fabric for temporary stabilization. Fabric, soil, stakes, live stakes, topsoil, and seeding will all occur by hand. Live stakes (willows, dogwood) will be inserted at an angle between each soil lift. Work at Area 1 will also require the removal of existing concrete slabs. These will be removed using a backhoe and will be disposed of at an approved off-site upland location. The concrete weir structure and it's footing will be removed to an elevation that will match the existing contours of the bank and bed of the stream (see cross-section). The work area will be isolated and dewatered using either sandbags or a portable dam system. Once the area is dewatered, the weir will be removed using standard excavation equipment operated from the shore. All concrete material and debris will be disposed of at an approved off-site upland -z- location. The bank will be removed to 18 inches below existing grade, backfilled and reseeded. Any bare slopes will be seeded with native grass seed and will be staked with live stakes from Pacific Willow, Scouler's Willow, and Red-osier dogwood sources available on-site. This letter verifies that your project is authorized under the terms and limitations of Regional General Permit (RGP) Category D (bank stabilization) and Nationwide Permit No. 33 (temporary construction, access, and dewatering). Your activities must be conducted in accordance with the conditions found in the Portland District Regional Conditions (Enclosure 2), Nationwide General Permit Conditions (Enclosure 3) and the 2002 Nationwide Permit Replacement Regional General Permit Conditions (Enclosure 4). You must also comply with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) Compliance Conditions (Enclosure 5), and the project specific conditions numbered (1) through (3) below. Failure to comply with any of the listed conditions could result in the Corps initiating an enforcement action. 1. The permittee shall ensure disturbed areas are seeded and planted with native plant species immediately following installation of the bank stabilization project as described in the August 23, 2006 memo to Ms. Julie Wirth, Clean Water Services (Enclosure 6). The planting areas shall be subject to the attached Vegetation Special Conditions (Enclosure 7). 2. To protect the stream from further bank erosion, the permittee shall develop and implement a stormwater management plan to control stormwater runoff from the onsite parking lot. The plan shall be developed within one year of the date of this permit and implemented within two years of the date of this permit. 3. You shall notify the Regulatory Branch with the start date when the activities authorized in waters of the U.S. are scheduled to begin. Notification shall be sent by email to cenwp.notify�ic,usace.army.mil or mailed to the following address: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CENWP-OD-GC Permit Compliance, Washington County P.O. Box 2946 Portland, Oregon 97208-2946 The subject line of the message shall contain the name of the county in which the project is located followed by the Corps of Engineers permit number. We direct your attention to the Portland District Regional Conditions(Enclosure 2) that require the transfer of this permit if the property is sold, and the General Permit Conditions (Enclosures 3 and 4) that requires you to submit a signed certificate when the work is completed. A "Compliance Certification" is provided (Enclosure 8). -3- This authorization does not obviate the need to obtain other permits where required. Permits, such as those required from the Oregon Department of State Lands (ODSL) under Oregon's Removal/Fill Law, must also be obtained before work begins. This verification is valid for a period of two years from the date of this letter unless the RGP or NWP expires, is modified, reissued, or revoked prior to that date. This RGP is scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked in January 2008. The nationwide permits are scheduled to be modified in January 2007. If you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date the RGP or NWP expires, is modified, or revoked, you will have 12 months from the date of the modification or revocation to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of the current RGP. If you have any questions regarding this RGP verification, please contact Ms. Kathryn L. Harris at the letterhead address, by telephone at (503) 808-4387, or by email at Kathryn.L.Harris@usace.army.mil. Sincerely, 1 • �' ` •' /�' iII/�� v i �� renc C. Evans Chief, egulatory Branch Enclosures Copy Furnished: Oregon Department of State Lands (Freibaum) Oregon Department of Environmental Quality(Cyril) ��..�.�..,� �� ,- . �� .r � � -- �} yy. C�.� ` p ' . �f` �.._ ,_�..�:.�•..-., { ; . ; rQC.'�,:f�F.l . ;.c-T Dj {� 'r-�-„ '" -'ti' � e ' : . 1:� +7` '�� ;. : ' �� T �'. . . �� _.11. ..',� .( .'M• � ljL /'.:: . - � �� . ` � .� � � �.. �f� �S ��o� �� 'i+�ita� .j.�r��'� . . `r i�Jt �`a �` F � . .t ,;c�"s.� �, • t�� j�'F�r�: j � � f��'—'�.- .��.•�Y4�_{'=. �il: $�: r.. - � . . 4 -,. `.,4�\.w ( • � (`l� /� ,r'; .�f3 4 t •�� ' 4 (,`e " ``�,~ , L °� i? �. .`� :l;. l..� 4 � �., p� `:' fS E, ` -, '`'� r ``'� .. � '` ``. � .s-•`. � S'�.�+�� .t�' �'�47f � `: r r�•�� .r� '+_ Yr� . � �� _ _ .�+ �l. �f . � : r .; l� v . , , �•, � 4 q� '�'., • � ., � . ��, � s _�% � •,,�} - �'� ` { �,."� �' �_ ,•. s° _ ,-; ti ,� 4. :�f--.. ��-�.� 1i� �, � � �'� �� • r �-� �j4 •"� � � � h" � � '' `=�� I t�, ��y — '.�- °? 'L �;,� `�-�, � ` � �' -C - t_�� _ •�•• � y}:rf�.�_.,, �f=� ��i . i�a�`�rf� Ff,�`��.-'�, _ ' � � � f t y'h� �� `�i � � "�. '�A` � r �' �rl�'•� � � � o . F '��t I ��f�G� •�:�.. .}� ,, ..• _ a � � �� `' � . �� f�� 4 •� ., " ~_ ` � `` � :::�--:� � � �� 4(� �:ti�.`-�S^i.f. !y rt <�l � `' c,�,0 �'�y {,�� `"• r"��f� •i � �-. �C �� 1�. )- .:� '!'`.. '"i �i' � � '',t ,� . t � �. �,«�\ 1�� •t -.. � �Q �} t \��' < {. . 1 ��c.,,..�•.--� ..;. •''��R �' � � � �j, �� ti � ; �� + ��_..-�"'—�� :'.. .'� , L� .A +.,� � ` ' T� t r, ,�• k �'�.� �;, �. _,.,._ . . . . _ y. , . f, � � �� ,�� - � , � ` , �;�� -'" ��`'� � •r�_ � �, ,� :: �--f s,. F�� j . ' I:� � r ',+�� "�'Z 1 � , '1� � C� r, ��It R ,t ,'� 1• �'�'�""`. ��.-�-�a � �: Project Area - ., . ``__. ��- .. '�: „L` , r�r ,� ;�� `-..� ,�'�'; � � '' �.:`,,. ; -.X . . 7 .' '5...��" � � " � 4 � �.. �} . � ` 1=��... ..; :A C� �� _�� y� . .��. '�� "�.. � `�..� � 4�+ .i � �.�... '�.t �Jy.y -,"'� .^+a.�•�:---- r �a>_ , ` .,�...�. �� C'....... � ..� r . t _ . ` �� ._wt �.s �, � —�__�=,��s.� � �p�� 1 - I _ '' j � ,`�+: t`'.^` p �r�; ti��._ .. 113SJQ(. . '"'"r-�..i` - M1 '".-_��„"'"�� ; � �-.��...�-�v+N , . t� ; f ;�� `��4- � ' � ,[ � � ff - .._, .-.. � ':��•�� _ F �� R �/ �.1 x ...Y '� � '� . ,- � • ` . �-; • .. .......--. , �. .- . _ � f _ -�6MK'�S �ri .�� •' �'r�Y �� •�a .:' _• � ' .��•""s.�,.:��...w i.::.—.� � • 1'1 i� + "� • .!�`i.� . t •��/• .�... � • .� �y �•� A P� 7 f � �f � � r r• � �� M ��' .rj` /, • � � f -• � — ! . � +y f _ �r ) �_ . � .-� '�� . ' � �� . C.,<�`�� {�.%,^ �< ' ,f'j � �'"', i 3 l,, � �j �■ .e - �• �,r •- � : `t � . +-.i� � . . �-�`"` s� i'1 ir � �� •� •�~ �� ."` ��` � t' �. � �`11 ��; �� . � . 1'.-. :.�... � f !.."+ • - 4 � 3 �:� - '^�"�"'�'-'' ' :. K�,�f �� a�i� "._� � • � i i � -�.?S " .'�..�✓!...� .s ��. . .Ow�.. ��ic •� �.�4st '...'�`�., � ..,_.�� y xr ' i• i'. �:,. • • � � � � �� j '3 �♦ � "� � , . � � a � �� . �i � �� .3 �� ' � j t � . �� `z`�tY Y `� T:. � 0 � � . �� \5 t� � ,i�_ =O �' � .�, . �� ' -.�. J�� . I` ;j t4 '` . ^ . j �.�� fY �1 . [tt ( Y / {�„ `� ' -�.�.S,r ...�� d } • .. .K. . � � " � �t � "/',� * � � .�� 4�TRX�4 :. � � � , � tpj t t � ^ Cf�i � .�.�' ..t � �.,�/1 � � � •;� '� 1M �- .I� 4v �w .Z � `� �, �y�y f "«�: �� .v�' . '�� .;:�P . .:�Y.t °�� rl`::�� p i �t,' (.. t��. �y �� Ir `'ls`c t ` �. r f r � '4v � �� '' ' "� �%:. j ,�i < Y '"^ r�� i - . �} -� i� • i;� ` �� '�Jso"'�t ��'4.�� . � w �•.� w t� � � " � 4 � . � ir � ". � f��_ � q � r .�. �eC � � °F o } 'Q� ' .ti.�- -� , �� '1 • ` '�, ��-. .• r ,� f.:.�y�. r� ` � � � ; /\ _��1 . :n � f.�. �� r '�:t'� ` "+� `f � � t.�:�` --�j�`- �� .. � ��- •�le. �'.: � � t s.. �� .* . �A� ��l� • _��.,a� ,j. (� - .r�_.- 4 4�J ,.a' �,� � f.l��. # �'�.l � � �f"I i _� �LM � � � �r.''r ... . t $ •.� p `�- `r �Y . � j �`. P �-�,,.^f . � � � �. .t - ,�' t � �F � �.w.t.'-�_ � l.slJ()� r '^d �l.�� 1'�,� K 1 �� .. \\ - ( �'. �f� . fl '��-F�ir �i �.0 Y �,~ - � �� . • .y• .' �y�-�:�, . wh`. 7 ,F' •� _` .�•` �� f ' • �'•� � 'r. ��" • ; - � .�• r� � w � __ j, , . e ___>* ��_-Y � . � � .. .� , � . . .� _.._ _ - „'s f °� • .. c.: -�' . L a� i � .. +� •. ` -��,i Source:USGS Lake Oswego pua�rengle OR,1981.Rewsed 19&4. ortl.np �S�i�m M •E�,.�. A �� Project#: 70477.00z VICINITY MAP FIGURE Gerber Legendary Blades � P B S oa`e. 14200 SW 72nd Avenue �uiy 2oos TIGARD, OREGON � ��:��l�r� � f _ � ti� �� z � � � �� , ` \ � ^ _� � � � � 1 h ' � II � � T2S � T2S R 06 h � I i USF J� QIDDA � _� PROJECT SITE . a 1 R1 E 07 0 L � N A � 230 5�� Feet ° Pro;�#: LOCATION MAP FIGURE 7oa��.002 Gerber Legendary Blades ^ P�� o$t°. 14200 SW 72 Avenue L �uiy 2006 TIGARD, OREGON En�losure � � . � ( — I ,v 8950'TO'E I -- -- - su�.. , � _-_ __� P B S ; ��:;;�;u,,:� � � STAGINGAREA� IJ`�i�j��;,� I � � i a "�"f B',:�i;e � ENGINEERING ANU ENVIRONMENLNL /IU ; �--°"�' � l, � / •�\{ I��g„ � 1J10MAINSTREET -�-�� - - I � J �� VANCOWER,WNSNINGTON 80860 ' � ARCA1 li�i�'„N I P�fUNE�.(360�ti90-11]I ` LEGE D I 11 � !�I��1• A. � FA%:1J60�fi96-9064 � N j� � ii��j; I hllp://www.pbsenv.com // 9 BENCFdMARK , �' \ 1 I . !'�� I � � \ � ��I„111 I � "'_ _ '.__ = N'ETLAND \ � � '1�� I ,1�'''i,G'��i � a ACTMTY/IMPACT AREAS � I�y�;U�1'� i . � l �� .�^� � �� A�-�A' o CROSS SECTION LOCA710N �.�� , -�`� ��` --•--- � ORDINARY MIGH WATERUNE 1'� �'�!H; ,�;' I \� � --- EXISTINC CONTOURS � � � � � ......,. .... �'�''�`" � I ', _' - _ � AREA2 i��'�. t ��!�, I �' •- � A 8 I 8 ' / ;;i��,'�1��; I � I �15, �" I C� +� � `�I °' ',/� �tt'I�',."w � � � �.'' �( ; ';�>�'!!':�>, � � 2 z �/ �... �,�,t,t'�,�� i i � r� <C W ! , \ .' '��`>>(;�.;� i � Q rz � � i ,I'�f,y,i i �I (-� Ca r... ..� t;;i�,;�r�� w w N O \ p j '/a y'��"��i i v� W � � � .:1i,�'��J ' .-7 v� � ; \� — �" � '�,`��'`/ � � � E--� 9 ' � � '�' e " ' W N .. ....�. . �. -- _ , p ` ' � � � !� � . r , , � � , � . r , , . ,_ - _ � , ---�y-. _.--- -'� � - .� _. — --------- " �� ,j�n c� ;1' ' �' N� -_ ` --_-• """_"' _ STU�YAREA � _" �� n��/ �i;�'� � W � a. , I •. , ` � .� , (� ' - -� .•',: y r f I-.� r'1�� jT.� ' . ,_______ __' _'_-___r_-___�______ _ _��... > ��.� i . � �--. :� t �-, , , 1.., � _ �: � � t_,,,. _ �.� - , �- :- p ''�-'� _✓ ,e+- ' -� �� cs.z'c' 1` _ - . -�"_,.�• I � t r--"ii�+�s� �3, - `_�°._°'j �"�.� _�euFx�F1i!�z' ,�.= r'e�.i: � �. - c't •" 1 �`=�a � � da'... � _ , = i-'' 'u"Zt-r-' .� �- � - _-� - ^^��....c_.__.._e..�r-. !-,� � ^�� ,�-�f`i . �, � ` ` ` I �.��-�;��` � � j -' =-'T "��'--Y:'.. ii— s'�sq'g,,��§ _ ��.t _ _ � �' �_��. .� � I i � `,,.�s.,N�� _ et 3� �"'": � - --°'_'-`- - - --- � c=' ---`_—_ ..�_' Y ..1,i � � �� . ----�-----�— EXISTINC CONCRETE WEIR ` ` ' -1 :.::� k � ��T.t`t(� '� , I 1 � �` '- - . WETLAND AREA=5794 SF � � � L------------ •�� i ' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------� � NOTES: a " 1.SURVEY PROVIDED BY STATEWIDE LAND SURVEYING,INC. ��,��«�n: ['1GU[ti: � 2.WETLAND BOUNDARY SURVEYED BY STATEWIDE LAND SURVEYING,INC.SUPPLEMENTAL POINT LOCATION iU477.(lU2 v ar sa iar COLLECTED BY PBS USING TRIMBLE GEOXT GPS UNIT WITH SUBMETER POST PROCESSING ACCUF2ACY. ^ � � ' --o.«: 3 S�A�E:� `w� , 3.SEE FIGURE 4 FOR CROSS SECTIONS AND PROPOSED CONTOURS. J U LY 200G `A' _ _ ____._.—_— __--__ �V^ VI � 1 wV M;m� �.,. ..,�..,a u.......M....M,�.�, .. ,,,...: � a� so��u� - - � N r � , m � - r � � , � , � , P P ' � I / A A u � I N / I� n � � o � � m 1 � i � � m \ > � � � � I I � � � a � a o ° \ a - O � }t, � o ° 'a '6 .� . ff Y' b � � � P r 8 N 7� a m • 0 � a �/ _ __ _ -- - -- - �- 4 & ,, ,� .. , z� ' - - ! � m i > , `,' 1/ / � � �� \ t' � �._ -u... �_ .. __.. — — .` — — — — — — — — — . \ � , _ _ �� m��+ L——— ':� .-...... . ��--_:_ ".,.. _"'____ _ r-- - - � ..,,,.,�. .. ..� ''�:_.,.- � � ..__ _` _ ,,:J'_ a".-,:�::'"T'�,' �:::,�� .... .�.�_ L. _'. ��/� ....- _'.� � . . _ ��i�( . . --.�.�'r '�`�.�L�� '�� '.....� � � � � �`1 �� .�"1�. �.. � A \ . __ '`��.� � � � � � I r Y� ;.y,.„L,�-�-'�"'� -�._ _.. _. _- -` �- __ .�J.`-_''-,:� - ��_ :?.:_ ' , - - - __ � _ - ^ �� ,"� � -, ?_. -; '^,�._ N:OrTAD�fY_-�.�F..r'.$�.fi ..:��.:� n�'S ��C��B'� E I "�.r�_ __,��-�--�` - w � � � i 1 � �-----------------------------------------J � -_I � ' CROSS SECTIO\S-BANK STABILIZATION � �� c^ � a ^ ��- �. "' GERBER LEGE\DARY BLADES ��N� _� , 14200 SW 72ND AVENUE � �"�� c D � TIGARD,OREGON � �� r A � I � rV l /� �� . PBS ei�oumeninc nuo envinar.,it�a.-r.� • ' 7�10MAINSTREET • ,,.. " VANCOWER,WASHINGTON 98fi60 ..t�... PNONE:(�0)690J771 . �_^....._,�• fNC(]GO)656�9081 , hllp:Uwww.pbsenv.com CRO55 SECTiON C - C r� t50 150 ! � � 1�B isB ! �` �5: \�./ 1 N� \ � 146 146 / ^R �N A � \ ` SAREA \� \p i°� ' � W I�� 114 , . �\�./ /E O W J /. _._... . ,. . _..�--: / , ....._ � z , .,. ._ ,. � . - � 14� ' i ,.,. �. .. � .r-_... -� �^ � la2 '' — —�« �i5o" . --..� _'_'--�`� •'/, � � (� .. _...._�---''. ".. ,�..`� . _.._.._. ..-. .z.._ .,� ." � ^ ..... ,. _ _ .. . /� ._..._� ;t .. ,. . .._..._.._..... .�y„s+.._ ' .\\1 _ _ __.'__.. �'a7?.y��_,��w- '~Z' _.;� - ` _ 1�0 ' {f. �.�r.�_ ��._ iiT • 'ry: �Y�F-�- •--- :-- _ �• � ' . �.sk i"'...::-.. ...�- � 140 ._.._. ._.�../�i ,:..1.- �i'+j,. .. -,��_ ` �,ic.�::- .-� W N . � ysy.x ._ ;_, .. --' � .-.�.^ ___....._._ • . .� . .�11 � _- ' — ,.J _.;`�, a', ` -^� +"j,�' �� t� A .,�.�:t �/sr n � P4 -_- -�C . �r ::�_'�"-' ". ;�Ar�*:,",��:; tJ-1 i � . _w�.�!..-� 4-c�•L-.�L'r - -�--�__._ w� �, �� E-� .-a � (� g ..•- . ., , � _ _ __ W t1820 -18 -16 -U -17 -10 -B -6 -1 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 t6 18 20158 _ :1 ...` • � O c � .i .. .:;..- `•�wc' "'�.°� ..:� .a...,; � ._-._..._.- •.�,�/,•� .. .�- (.y _..."---'-'---'.�. �. .�_ � � .... ... ..._ � c� � ---._.._._.... . - - - ?•s:� %�� cn � .N�-. F �Q —--` �.�--'••.:' 1% y a .r vl W . �, ------ ExiSTMC GRADE V --�--—--%w��--':�' WEIR O � � PROPOSED GRAOE '��'�`''_'�---`:, � � E i , � rn i � 3, � a �� i � -� - - - - - - - - - - - -_-__- - - - � 3 = " ��`"�"`�` FIGURL r a ir ro 70A77.IH)2 "� � ��a«: 4 B scuE:r=3° • )fi1_]'200G �.ry,� �" ; . —•— . �� i ;��`, r,r;�l ��. ;,�t' Y��,�;;!_',. i , � �',�'.'. �v LEGEND STAGING AREA ��.' ; " , - � � � �`! C- �L„'�� q� ' O � wETLnND . ... :i;i, � ` :' .�.1 �� ACTINTY/IMPACT AREAS t�+��+EERV�uu,oeNV:r."�,:�.c:.ra.. �'• . �Q� � t]�u MnIN STREC� ' �.,{ O VAl1�OWLlt.WASMIN4I01�9B6GV � — — — � ORDINARY HICH WATERLINE P�1�NE:(]fi0)690-qJi � � ''�`� � rnx:l�caleasaow . . . , ,. ' ''1''�� --��........... � EXISTINC CONTOURS nup:uwww.DDSenv.ccm ��"'' � � SILT FENCE �t{�� o � BIOfILTER BAGS , - • , ,i[� .l I r;`„ , .;:'i -��r AREA 1 � ;. � , ; V ��I!' ,� ' ';. . "�` " c .. ''��r � i�� N /� � 'lt; R ..-�P� � � + I�:' �� '. � �, P� ..�"�5 �� ,,I� '�..•� �f ��` .--� ! . 1 i; � �',r;� o f� � 1�i �f � � E ` .� -- ... / O C�1 , �'.' ;�j�, _J%^ ��. . - r. � � .7 . ,� : , ; , .: � i :„!'• ' � � . ' ....... r . O � � , . : F1 h ' �`,7 i __ —..� ...... / �) �'' ,.. _ S. 1 �;;�i ; 'rc'a._::;t'"�� ,W!'x��,,� ,� � ¢' 0 � : l _r /� {':�li 'l � I ___.._� ::^'i�..::'.= ----- W'x�r-� .. -� �yi/ /� z ' i -':''�`, � _ .' �� 'j` � � 14 1 C ' �'.r�` /. �� ~ ��♦ . '{�. �Y�I W W, W � O M H i .�'� I� i " / .� ...� _ �•':r ��v ._.+._,!�•\ 0.�i � r 0.. Z "'� '� �� ---ti� =,� � w,;.�'„� ,�;—�' ,� w w 3 / �:,_,,:.:;..:;:,:;=_::,'��...__...... ;��' .. .. \W G1 .a � � _. ... ._.. , � `' ,i � , — " t—C� ? r. ; , ,� , � � �, �.... •� "f . . � � ; ` ,r� ...; ,- , � .. . J ,:. , _�.;;:.-- .��_ __ _ W W � °4 0 F � i�l '� ,, ,,, '� W N H � i ° i �`1(� 'I�I =—_ :,J=�% � W H � � i �` �JI�' I '�� --� -_.:'`':-l/WEIR W W y � � — 's°�-=.. W � ' i j i f ��i - -- +� � ° /� 1 W �-{ # ��i w ! � :i�\ � i 'I � �I '�� nEt�2 � �•� `;1` i. � 4�r ' 'i; � ` � `�( � `` `��' /� s, , � ''��'� // k �"� ,` ;� ,�, � ,. ;;;�-; - � f �'• -;��Y� NOTES: � � � �I �t`'}�,�� a� 1,STOCKPILE DIRT WILL BE COVERED DURING RAIN EVENTS. � P1CU1tL, j� i� '�'`1 r�,;�<<n: � , � I��I� � ;i. ��' sc,ue:r.,xa 7047zuo2 � , � I � !�� y� 2.FOR BANK STABLI2ATION WORK,WATER TO BE PUMPED -1):��: (.� � � -� J ' �� "� . DOWNSTREAM AROUND BIOFII:�ER BAG 9ARRIERS. )�J1.Y 2006 v p� ,Y �� . � t, 1 �� ',iNIMUM IFILL KEY TRENCH WITH COMMON ASPHALT 3/4 MINUS ANGULAR PAVEMENT ROCKS �y :�'`;� r `�I;,��_i •I.: � EASTERN EDGE� `�~ �` `�-�-`�\'/��` `' ,%`\' �r j%�� _ �� OF FAVEMENT %f�r �� ?�!' '�� -!%�' ; '�- _r' ''� ` ' ` �LIVE S?AKE (TYPICAL) '',`v il.` ````,; ' _ .`; i=-. ONE-FOGr DEEP !�; =�� • � � '�'- _��_; TRENCH . .-� t 1`•%�f i:'-'.�,'�•� I + -� �_ � ;` j • _ ' 6" `'r��`�` /i'!�'. 'r ,�i i,�-� _ • �� (� i r`/_��` -�., ; '- � ��''r �1; 'i�, "i I i � � � t , ' _.. ,. 6�. `� r�;\ J 1�' .`j/;j ��1 i� 1 �f�; �' �- '+j`''�` i'!I � 6-INCH UFT OF COMMON SUBSOIL � r�• ; !.`l )_r; ` � t��'1! '+�� , � � +, ��•1��1 �il�i � r�`. :_- .�� • � . ' •,• �. 6•• li=1j�'i I . 1�_�Ir �(jr- + ��1lr it. � 1� -_lil��f_ _ 6�. �"`f=tr •i.f1- �lr` ��\ ` r; ' r�'�!� ��`"�; '%��'.r`'-::. �STAKE (TYPICAL) � '..��i%_; ,.�f -�-_�� r;�`` ;� ��r;. } ,` _ � , _ LOW FLOW ��! �<<, !f �ff '�', ;,•' % �� WATER LEVEL 6�� l'�`l!I_"�-; +ii�' ' �� ' � �_ � ��j!�•��r�l �!1 1 f f��, i� � t ,, BOTTOM WOVEN FABRIC \�� Oi�.`�.�V�; C . OF STREAM 6" � ,J �� ULJ�J �J,� � �� EXCAVATE TRENCH � SUBSOIL I�CQC.✓-��-�-�;�� ,��'; BELOW LOW- LOW WATER LEVEL ONE FOOT OF 3'a-INCH ANGULAR ROCK : S 3' MINIMUM � � 0 � � NOTES: ' 1.LIVE STAKES TO BE PLACED 3"-4"APART. 2.SOIL LIFTS WILL BE STEPPED BACK AT EVEN INCREMENTS. a b a U % g NOT TO SCALE prepared for: GERBER L.EGENDARY BLADES � �� Project#: _ �oa��.002 BANK STABILIZATION DETAIL �GURE � Date: 14200 SE 72ND AVEMJE 7 ^ P B S JIJI.Y 2006 TTGARD,OREGON Er�Cd�su�� . Portland District Regional Conditions (a)In-water Work Windows: Ball Creek does not contain fish species listed under the ESA. Therefore, an in-water work window is not applicable to the DA permit. Best management practices for construction and erosion control shall be installed and maintained throughout construction. (b)Upland Disposal: All excess material w-ill be taken to a suitable upland location for disposal. The material shall be placed in a location and manner that prevents its discharge into waterways or wetlands. (c)Heavy Equipment: Heavy equipment shall be operated from the bank and not placed in the stream unless specifically authorized by the District Engineer. Heavy equipment must be placed on mats or similar precautions must be taken to minimize damage to wetland resources. (d) Fish Screening: Fish Screening will comply with standards approved by the National Marine Fisheries Service or the Oregon Department of Fish&Wildlife,as appropriate. (e) Cultural Resources& Human Burials: Permittees must immediately notify the District Engineer if at any time during the course of the work authorized,human burials, cultural resources, or historic properties, as identified by the National Historic Preservation Act, may be affected. Failure to stop work in the area of exposure until such time the Corps has complied with the provisions of 33 CFR 325, Appendix C,the National Historic Preservation Act and other pertinent regulations, could result in violation of state and federal laws. Violators are subject to civil and criminal penalties. (� Fish Passage: Permittee shall insure activities authorized by nationwide permit and/or Regional General Permit(RGP)will not restrict passage of aquatic life. Activities such as the installation of culverts or diversion structures, or other modifications to channel morphology must be designed to be consistent with fish passage standards developed by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and the National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS). The standards can be found in the document entitled "ODFW standards and Criteria for Stream Road Crossings".The streambed shall be returned to pre-construction contours after construction unless the purpose of the activity is to eliminate a fish barrier. (g) Riparian Vegetation Protection & Restoration: When working in waters of the United States or riparian areas the construction boundary shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Permittee shall mark and clearly define the construction boundary before beginning work. Native riparian vegetation will be successfully established along tributaries where the vegetation was removed by construction. The plantings shall start at the ordinary high water mark and extend 10 feet back from the top of the bank. The plantings must be completed by the end of the first planting season following the disturbance. (h) Erosion Controls: All practicable erosion control devices shall be installed and maintained in good working order throughout construction to prevent the unauthorized discharge of material into a wetland or tributary. The devices shall be installed to maximize their effectiveness, e.g. sediment fences shall generally be buried or similarly secured. These controls shall be maintained until permanent erosion controls are in-place. �� 2 Practicabl:, erosion control ineasures inclucle'out are not limited tu tne folio�ving: a. Fill is placed in a manner that avoids disturbance to the maximum practicable extent(e.g. placing fill with a machine rather than end-dumping from a truck). b. Prevent all construction materials and debris from entering waterway; c. Use filter bags, sediment fences, sediment traps or catch basins, silt curtains, leave strips or berms, Jersey barriers, sand bags, or other measures sufficient to prevent movement of soil; d. Use impervious materials to cover stockpiles when unattended or during rain event; e. Erosion control measures shall be inspected and maintained daily to ensure their continued effectiveness, f. No heavy machinery in a wetland or other waterway; g. Use a gravel staging area and construction access; h. Fence off planted areas to protect from disturbance and/or erosion; and i. Flag or fence off wetlands adjacent to the construction area. (i)Maps and drawings: In addition to the items required in Nationwide Permit and Regional General Permit Conditions 13, all preconstruction notifications shall contain maps showing the project location as well as plan-view and cross-sectional drawings showing the proposed work. The map(s) shall be of a scale and detail to clearly identify the project location(s). Drawings shall be sufficient in number and detail to accurately portray the project. (j)Bank Protection: Rip-rap shall be clean, durable, angular rock. The use of other materials such as broken concrete, asphalt, tires,wire, steel posts or similar materials is not authorized. T'he project design shall minimize the placement of rock and maximize the use vegetation and organic material such as root wads to the extent practicable. Riparian plantings shall be included in all project designs unless the permittee can demonstrate they are not practicable. The permittee must notify the District Engineer in accordance with Nationwide Permit and Regional General Pernut Conditions#13 for any activity that includes bank stabilization. (k)Inspection of project site: The permittee must allow representatives of the Corps to inspect the authorized activity to confirm compliance with nationwide permit and/or RGP terms and conditions. Personnel from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Land Conservation and Development are considered to be authorized"representatives"for the purpose of Section 401 Water Quality or Coastal Zone Management inspections.For projects on tribal land the Environmental Protection Agency is considered an authorized representative. A request for access to the site will normally be made sufficiently in advance to allow a property owner or representative to be on site with the agency representative maldng the inspection. (1) Sale of property/transfer of permit: If you sell the property associated with this permit,you must transfer the permit to the new owner(s) and obtain their signature(s). A copy of this permit with the new owner(s) signature shall be sent to this office to validate the transfer of this permit authorization Nationwide Permit Genera] Conditions (From the January 15, 2002 Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 10) 1. Navigation 2. Proper Maintenance 3. Soi? Erosion and Sediment Controls 4. Aquatic Life Movements 5. Equipment 6. Regional and Case-by-Case Conditions 7. Wild and Scenic Rivers 8. Tribal Rights 9. Water Quality 10. Coastal Zone Management 11. Endangered Species 12. Historic Properties 13. Notification 14. Compliance Certification 15. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits. 16. Water Supply Intakes 17. Shellfish Beds 18. Suitable Material 19. Mi,�igation 20. Spawning Areas 21. Management of Water Flows 22. Adverse Effects from Impoundments 23. Waterfowl Breeding Areas 24. Removal of Temporary Fills 25. Designated Critical Resource Waters 26. Fills Within 100-year Floodplains 27. Construction Period Encl. 3 1 C. Nationwide Permit General Conditions The following General Conditions must be followed in order for any authorization by an NWP to be valid: 1. Navi ation. No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation. 2. Pro�er MaintenarTCe. Any structure or iill authorized shall be properly maintained, including maintenance to ensure public safety. 3. Sorl Erosion and Seciiment Cont�•ols. Appropriate soil erosion and sediment controls must be used and maintained in effective operating condition during conshuction,and all exposed soil and other fills, as well as any work below the ordinary high water mark or high tide line,must be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable date. Permittees are encouraged to perform work within waters of the United States during periods of low-flow or no-flow. 4. �uatic Life Movements. No activity may substantially disrupt the necessary life-cycle movements of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species that normally migrate through the area, unless the activity's primary purpose is to impound water. Culverts placed in streams must be installed to maintain low flov�conditions. 5. Enuipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands must be placed on mats,or other measures must be taken to minimize soil disturbance. 6. Re¢ional and Case-Bv-Case Conditions. The activity must comply with any regional conditions that may have been added by the Division Engineer(see 33 CFR 330.4(e)). The activity must comply with any regional conditions that may have been added by the Division Engineer(see 33 CFR 330.4(e))and with any case specific conditions added by the Corps or by the state or tribe in its Section 401 Water Quality Certification and Coastal Zone Management Act consistency deternunation 7. Wild ancf Scenic Rivers. No activity may occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System; or in a river officially designated by Congress as a"study river"for possible inclusion in the system,while the river is in an official study status;unless the appropriate Federal agency,with direct management responsibility for such river, has determined in writing that the proposed activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River � designation,or study status. Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be obtained from the appropriate Federal ]and management agency in the area(e.g.,National Park Service,U.S. Forest Service,Bureau of Land Management, U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service). 8. Ti-ibc�l Riphts. No activity or its operation may impair reserved tribal rights, including,but not limited to, reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights. 9. Water Qualiry. (a}In certain states and tribal lands an individua1401 Water Quality Certification must be obtained or waived(See 33 CFR 330.4(c)).(b)For NWPs 12, 14, 17, 18,32,39,40,42,43, and 44,where the state or triba1401 certification(either generically or individually)does not require or approve water quality management measures, the permittee must provide water quality management measures that will ensure that the authorized work does not result in more than minimal degradation of water quality(or the Coips determines that compliance with state or local standards,where applicable,will ensure no more than minimal adverse effect on water quality). An important component of water quality management includes stormwater management that minimizes degradation of the downstream aquatic system,including water quality(refer to General Condition 21 for stormwater management requirements).Another important component of water quality management is the establishment and maintenance of vegetated buffers next to open waters,including streams(refer to General Condition 19 for vegetated buffer requirements for the NWPs). This condition is only appiicable to projects that have the potential to affect water quality. While appropriate measures must be taken,in most cases it is not necessary to conduct detailed studies to identify such measures or to require monitoring. 2 10. Coastal Zorre Mm�a eme�:t. In certain states, an individual state coastal zone management consistency cor.currence must be obtained or waived�see 33 CFR Section 330.�(dj). 11. Endan ered S ep cies. (a)No activity is authorized under any NWP, Nhich is likely te jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species,or a species proposed for such designation, as identif7ed under the Fecieral Endangered Species Act(ESA), or which will destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species. Non-federal permittees shall notify the District Engineer if any listed species or designated critical habitai might be affected or is in the vicinity of the project, or is located in the designated critical habitat and shall not begin work on the activity untii notified by the District En�ineer that the requirements of the ESA have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. For activities that may affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species or designated critical habitat, the notification must include the name(s) oi the endangered or threatened snecies that may be affected by the proposed work or that utilize the designated critical habitat that may be affected by the proposed work. As a result of formal or informal consultation with the FWS or NMFS the District Engineer may add species-specific regional endangered species conditions to the NWPs. (b)Authorization of an activity by a NWP does not authorize the"take"of a threatened or endangered species as defined under the ESA. In the absence of separate authorization(e.g.,an ESA Section 10 Pemut, a Biological Opinion with"incidental take"provisions,etc.)from the USFWS or the NMFS,both lethal and non-lethal"takes"of protected species are in violation of the ESA. Information on the location of threatened and endangered species and their critical habitat can be obtained directly from the offices of the USFWS and NMFS or their world wide web pages at http://www.fws.gov/r9endspp/endspp.html and http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prof res/overview/es.htm respectively. . 12. Historic Prope�•ties. No activity which may affect historic properties listed,or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places is authorized,until the District Engineer has complied with the provisions of 33 CFR Part 325, Appendix C. The prospective permittee must notify the District Engineer if the authorized activity may affect any historic properties listed, determined to be eligible,or which the prospective permittee has reason to believe may be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places,and shall not begin the activity until notified by the District F,ngineer that the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. Information on the location and existence of historic resources can be obtained from tfie State Historic Preservation Office and the National Register of Historic Places(see 33 CFR 330.4(g)). For activities that may affect historic properties listed in,or eligible for listing in,the National Register of Historic Places,the notificatio�:must state which historic property may be affected by the proposed work or include a vicinity map indicating the location of the historic property. 13. Notification. (a)Ti•ming;where required by the terms of the NWP,the prospective pernuttee must notify the District Engineer with a preconstruction notif cation(PCN)as early as possible. The District Engineer must deternune if the notification is complete within 30 days of the date of receipt and can request additional information necessary to make the PCN complete only once. However,if the prospective permittee does not provide all of the requested information,then the District Engineer will notify the prospective permittee that the notification is still incomplete and the PCN review process will not commence until all of the requested information has been received by the District Engineer. The prospective pernuttee shall not begin the activity: (1)Until notified in writing by the Dist�ict Engineer that the activity may proceed under the NWP with any special conditions imposed by the Dishict or Division Engineer; or (2)If notified in writing by the District or Division Engineer that an Individual Permit is required;or (3)Unless 45 days have passed from the District Engineer's receipt of the complete not fcation and the prospective permittee has not received written notice from the District or Division Engineer. Subsequently,the pennittee's right to proceed under the NWP may be modified,suspended,or revoked only in accordance with the procedure set forth in 33 CFR 330.5(d)(2). (b)Contents of Notification:The�iotification must be in writing and include the following information: (1)Name, address and telephone numbers of the prospective permittee; (2)Location of the proposed project; (3)Brief description of tlie proposed project;the project's purpose;direct and indirect adverse environmental effects the project would cause; any other NWP(s),Regional General Permit(s),or Individual Permit(s)used or intended to be used to authorize any part of the proposed project or any related activity. Sketches should be 3 provided when necessary to show that the activity complies with the terms of the NWP (Sketches usually clarify the project and when provided result in a quicker decision.); (4) For Iv'WPs 7, 12, 14, 18, 21, 34, 38,39,40,41,42,and 43,the PCN must also include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands,vegetated shallows(e.g., submerged aquatic vegetation, seagrass beds), and riffle and pool complexes(see paragraph 13(fl); (5) For NWP 7 (Outfall Structures and Maintenance),the PCN must include information regarding the original design capacities and configurations of those areas of the facility where maintenance dredging or excavatior.is proposed; (6) For NWP 14(Linear Transportation Projects),The PCN must include a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset permanent losses of waters of the US and a statement describing how temporary losses of waters of the US will be nunimized to the maximum extent practicable; (7) For NWP 21 (Surface Coal Mining Activities),the PCN must include an Office of Surface Mining(OSM) or state-approved mitigation plan,if applicable. To be authorized by this NWP,the District Engineer must determine that the activity complies with the terms and conditions of the NWP and that the adverse environmental effects are minimal both individually and cumulatively and must notify the project sponsor of this determination in writing; (8)For NWP 27(Stream and Wetland Restoration),the PCN must include documentation of the prior condition of the site that will be reverted by the permittee; (9)For NWP 29(Single-Family Housing),the PCN must also include: (i)Any past use of this NWP by the Individual Permittee and/or the pernuttee's spouse; ' (ii)A statement that the single-family housing activity is for a personal residence of the permittee; (iii)A description of the entire parcel,including its size,and a delineation of wetlands. For the purpose of this NWP,parcels of land measuring'/.-acre or less will not require a formal on-site delineation. However, the applicant shall provide an indication of where the wetlands are and the amount of wetlands that exists on the property. For parcels areater than '/.-acre in size,formal wetland delinearion must be prepared in accordance with the current method required by the Corps. (See paragraph 13(fl); (iv)A written description of all land(including,if available,legal descriptions)owned by the prospecti've permittee and/or the prospective permittee's spouse,within a one mile radius of the parcel,in any form of ownership (including any land owned as a partner,corporation,joint tenant,co-tenant,or as a tenant-by-the-entirety) and any land on which a purchase and sale agreement or other con�act for sale or purchase has been executed; (10)For NWP 31 (Maintenance of Existing Flood Control Projects),the prospective permittee must either notify the District Engineer with a PCN prior to each maintenance activity or submit a five year(or less) maintenance plan. In addition,the PCN must include all of the following: (i) Sufficient baseline information identifying the approved channel depths and configurations and existing facilities. Minor deviations are authorized,provided the approved flood control protection or drainage is not increased; (ii)A delineation of any affected special aquatic sites,including wetlands;and, (iii)Location of the dredged material disposal site; (11)For NWP 33 (Temporary Construction,Access,and Dewatering),the PCN must also include a restoration plan of reasonable measures to avoid and minimize adverse effects to aquatic resources; (12)For NWPs 39,43 and 44,the PCN must also include a written statement to the District Engineer explaining how avoidance and minimization for losses of waters of the US were achieved on the project site; (13)For NWP 39 and NWP 42,the PCN must include a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset losses of waters of the US or justification explaining why compensatory mitigarion should not be required. For discharges that cause the loss of greater than 300 linear feet of an intermittent stream bed,to be authorized, the District Engineer must determine that the activity complies with the other terms and conditions of the NWP, determ:ne adverse environmental effects are minimal both individually and cumulatively,and waive the limitation on stream impacts in writing before the permittee may proceed; (14)For NWP 40(Agricultural Activities),the PCN must include a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset losses of waters of the US. This NWP does not authorize the relocation of greater than 300 linear-feet of existing serviceable drainage ditches constructed in non-tidal streams unless, for drainage ditches constructed in intermittent non-tidal streams,the District Engineer waives this criterion in writing,and the District Engineer has determined that the project complies with all terms and conditions of this NWP,and that any adverse impacts of the project on the aquatic environment are minimal,both individually and cumulatively; (15)For NWP 43(Stormwater Management Facilities),the PCN must include, for the consiruction of new stormwater management facilities, a maintenance plan(in accordance with state and loca] requirements, if 4 applicable) and a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset losses of waters of the US. For discharges that cause the loss of greater than 300 linear feet of an intermittent stream bed, to be authorized, the District Engineer must deternune that the activity complies with the other terms and conditions of the NWP, determine adverse environmental e::ects are minimal both individually and cumulatively,and waive the linutation on stream impacts in writing before the permittee may proceed; (16) For NWP 44(Mining Activities), the PCN must include a description of all waters of the US adversely affected by the project, a description of ineasures taken to minimize adverse effects to waters of the US, a description of ineasures taken to comply with the criteria of the NWP, and a reclamation plan(for all aggregate mining a�tivities in isolated waters and non-tidal wetIands adjacent to headwaters and any hard rock/mineral mining activities); (17)For activities that may adversely affect Federall��-iisted endangered or threatened species,the PCN must include the name(s)of those endangered or threatened species that may be affected by the proposed work or utilize the designated critical habitat that may be affected by the proposed work;and (18)For activities that may affect historic properties listed in, or eligible for listing in,the Narional Register of Historic Places,the PCN must state which historic property may be affected by the proposed work or include a vicinity map indicating the location of the historic property. (c)Form of NotiTcation: The standard Individual Permit application form(Form ENG 4345)may be used as the notificntion but must clearly indicate that it is a PCN and must include all of the information required in(b)(1)-(18) of General Condition 13. A letter containing the requisite information may also be used. (d) District EnCineer's Decision: In reviewing the PCN for the proposed activity,the District Engineer will determine whether the activity authorized by the NWP will result in more than minimal individual or cumulative adverse environmental effects or may be contrary to the public interest. The prospective permittee may submit a proposed mitigation plan with the PCN to expedite the process. The District Engineer will consider any proposed compensatory mitigation the applicant has included in the proposal in determining whether the net adverse environmental effects to the aquatic environment of the proposed work are minimal. If the District Engineer determines that the activity complies with the terms and conditions of the NWP and that the adverse effects on the aquatic environment are minimal,after considering mitigation,the District Engineer will notify the permittee and include�any conditions the District Engineer deems necessary. The District Engineer must approve any compen5atory mitigation proposal before the permittee commences work. If the prospective pernuttee is required to submit'a compensatory mitigation proposal with the PCN,the proposal may be either canceptual or detailed. If the prospective permittee elects to submit a compensatory mitigation plan with the PCN,the District Engineer will expedi#iously review the proposed compensatozy mitigation plan. The District Engineer must review the plan within 45 days of receiving a complete PCN and deteimine whether the conceptual or specific proposed mitigation would ensure no more than minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environment. If the net adverse effects of the project on the aquatic environment(after consideration of the compensatory mitigation proposal) are determined by the District Engineer to be minimal,the District Engineer will provide a timely written response to the applicant. The response will state that the project can proceed under the terms and conditions of the NWP. If the District Engineer determines that the adverse effects of the proposed work are more than minimal,then the District Engineer will notify the applicant either:(1)that the project does not qualify for authorization under the NWP and instruct the applicant on the procedures to seek authorization under an Individual Pemut;(2)that the project is authorized under the NWP subject to the applicant's submission of a mitigation proposal that would reduce the adverse effects on the aquatic environment to the minimal level;or(3)that the project is authorized under the NWP with specific modifications or conditions. Where the District Engineer determines that mitigation is required to ensure no more than minimal adverse effects occur to the aquatic environment,the activity will be authorized within the 45-day PCN period. The authorization will include the necessary conceptual or specific mitigation or a requirement that the applicant submit a mitigation proposal that would reduce the adverse effects on the aquatic environment to the minimal]evel. When conceptual mitigation is included,or a mitigation pla.n is required;�nder item(2)above, no work in waters of the US will occur until the District Engineer has approved a specific mitigation plan. (e)Agency Coordination:The District Engineer will consider any comments from Federal and state agencies concerning the proposed activity's compliance with the terms and conditions of the N WPs and the need for mitigation to reduce the project's adverse environmental effects to a minimal level. 5 For activities requiring rzot;�icn!icn !o the District En�in?er that result in the loss of�reater than '/-acre of waters of the US,the District Engineer will provide immediately(e.g., via facsimile h�ansmission, overnight mail, or other expeditious manner) a copy to the appropriate Federal or state offices(L'SFWS, state natural resource or water quality agency, EPA,State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO), and, if appropriate, the NIvIFS}. With the exception of NWP 37, these agencies will then have 10 calendar days fi�om the date the matzrial is transmitted to telephone or fax the District Engineer notice that they intend to provide substantive,site-specific comments. If so contacted by an agency,the District Engineer will wait an additional 15 calendar days before making a decision on the izotification. The District Engineer will fully consider agency conunents received within the specified time frame,but will provide no response to the resource agency, except as provided below. The District Engineer will indicate in the administrative record associated with each�iotif cation that the resource agencies'concerns were considered. As required by Section 305(b)(4)(B)of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act,the District Engineer will provide a response to NMFS within 30 days of receipt of any Essential Fish Habitat conservation recommendations.Applicants are encouraged to provide the Corps multiple copies of notificntinns to expedite agency notification. � (fl Wetland Delineations: Wetland delineations must be prepared in accordance with the current method r�quired by the Corps(For NWP 29 see paragraph(b)(9)(iii)for parcels less than '/.-acre in size). The permittee may ask the Corps to delineate the special aquatic site. There may be some delay if the Coips does the delineation. Furthermore, the 45-day period will not start until the wetland delineation has been completed and submitted to the Corps, where appropriate. 14. Compliance Certi ication. Every permittee who has received NWP verification from the Coips will submit a signed certification regarding the completed work and any required mitigation. The certification will be forwarded by the Corps with the authorization letter and will include: (a)A statement that the authorized work was done in accordance with the Cocps authorization,including any general or specific conditions; (b)A statement that any required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions;and(c)The signature of the permittee certifying the completion of the work and mitigation. , 15. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits. The use of more than one NWP for a single and complete project is prohibited, except when the acreage loss of waters of the US authorized by the NWPs does not exceed the acreage limit of the NWP with the highest specified acreage limit(e.g. if a road crossing over ridal waters is constructed under NWP 14,with associated bank stabilization authorized by NWP 13,the maximum acreage loss of waters of the US for the total project cannot exceed 1/3-acre). 16. Water Supplv Intakes. No activity,including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discl-�arges of dredged ar fill material,may occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake except where the activity is for repair of the public water supply intake structures or adjacent bank stabilization. 17. Shell tsfz Beds. No activity,including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of dredged or fill material,may occur in areas of concentrated shellfish populations,unless the activity is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by NWP 4. 18. Suitable Material. No activity, including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of dredged or fill material,may consist of unsuitable material(e.g.,trash, debris,car bodies,asphalt,etc.) and material used for construction or discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts(see Section 307 of the CWA). 19. Miti ag tion. The District Engineer will consider the factors discussed below when determining the acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to offset adverse effects on the aquatic environment that are more than minimal. (a)The project must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects to waters of the US to the maximum extent practicable at the project site(i.e.,on site). (b) Mitigation in all its forms(avoiding,minimizing,rectifying,reducing or compensating) will be required to the extent necessary to ensure that the adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. (c) Compensatory mitigation at a minimum one-for-one ratio will be required for all wetland impacts requiring a PCN, unless the District Engineer determines in writing that some other form of mitigation would be more 6 environmentally appropriate and provides a project-specific waiver of this requirement. Consistent with National policy,the District Engineer will establish a preference for restoration of wetlands as compensatory mitigation, with preseivation used only in exceptional circumstances. (d) Compensatory mitigation(i.e., replacement or substitution of aquatic resources for those impacted) will not be used to increase the acreage losses allowed by the acreage limits of some of the NWPs. For example, '/<-acre of wetlands cannot be created to change a'/.-acre loss of wetlands to a '/,-acre loss associated with NWP 39 verification. However, '/�-acre of created wetlands can be used to reduce the impacts of a %Z-acre loss of wetlands to the minimum impact]evel in order to meet the minimal impact requirement associated with NWPs. (e)To be practicable, the mitigation must be available and capable of being done considering costs, existing technology, and logistics in light of the overall project purposes. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project;establishing and maintaining wetland or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creatin�,restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values,preferably in the same watershed. (fl Compensatory mitigation plans for projects in or near streams or other open waters will normally include a requirement for the establishment, maintenance,and legal protection(e.g.,easements, deed restrictions)of vegetated buffers to open waters. In many cases,vegetated buffers will be the only compensatory mitigation required. Vegetated buffers should consist of native species. The width of the vegetated buffers required will address documented water quality or aquatic habitat loss concerns. Normaily,the vegetated buffer will be 25 to 50 feet wide on each side of the stream,but the District Engineers may require slightly wider vegetated buffers to address documented water quality or habitat loss concerns. Where both wetlands and open waters exist on the project site, the Corps will determine the appropriate compensatory mitigation(e.g.,stream buffers or wetlands compensation) based on what is best for the aquatic environment on a watershed basis. In cases where vegetated buffers are deternuned to be the most appropriate form of compensatory mitigation,the District Engineer may waive or reduce the requirement to provide wetland compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts. (g)Compensatory mitigation proposals submitted with the "notification"may be either conceptual or detailed. !f conceptual plans are approved under the verification, then the Corps will condition the verification to require detailed plans be submitted and approved by the Corps prior to construction of the authorized activity in waters of � the US. (h)Permittees may propose the use of mitigation banks,in-lieu fee arrangements or separate activity-specific compensatory mitigation. In all cases that require compensatory mitigation,the mitigation provisions will specify fhe party responsible for accomplishing and/or complying with the mitigation plan. 20. Spaw�:ing Areas. Activities,including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of dredged or fill material,in spawning areas during spawning seasons must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. Activities that result in the physical destruction(e.g.,excavate, fill,or smother downstream by substantial turbidity)of an important spawning area are not authorized. 21. Management of Water Flows. To the maximum extent practicable,the activity must be designed to maintain preconsh-uction downstream flow conditions(e.g.,location,capacity, and flow rates). Furthermore, the activity must not permanently restrict or impede the passage of normal or expected high flows(unless the primary purpose of the fill is to impound waters)and the structure or discharge of dredged or fill material must withstand expected high flows. The activity must, to the maximum extent practicable,provide for retaining excess flows from the site, provide for maintaining surface flow rates from the site similar to preconstruction conditions,and provide for not increasing water flows from the project site,relocating water, or redirecring water flow beyond preconstruction conditions. Stream channelizing will be reduced to the minimal amount necessary,and the activity must, to the maximum extent practicable,reduce adverse effects such as flooding or erosion downstream and upstream of the project site,unless the activity is part of a larger system designed to manage water flows. In most cases,it will not be a requirement to conduct detailed studies and monitoring of water flow. This condition is only applicable to projects that have the potential to affect waterflows. While appropriate measures must be taken, it is not necessary to conduct detailed studies to identify such measures or require monitoring to ensure their effectiveness. Normally,the Corps will defer to state and local authorities regarding management of water flow. 7 22. Adverse Effects From:mpoca7dn:en:s. If!he activiry creates an impoundment of water, adverse effects to the aquatic system due to the acceleration of the passage of water, and/or the resri�icting its flow shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. This includes shvctures and work in navigable waters of the US, or discharges o� dredged or fill material. 23. Water folvl Breedi�2Q Areas. Activities,including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of dredged or fill material, into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. 24. Rernovnl o�Temporarv Fills. Any temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to their preexisting elevation. 25. Desi�natecf Cr•itical Resource Waters. Critical resource waters include,NOAA-designated marine sanctuaries, National Estuarine Research Reserves,National Wild and Scenic Rivers,critical habitat for Federally listed threatened and endangered species,coral reefs,state natural heritage sites, and outstanding national resource waters or other waters officially designated by a state as having particular environmental or ecological significance and identified by the District Engineer after notice and opportunity for public comment. The District Engineer may also designate additional critical resource waters after notice and opportunity for comment. (a)Except as noted below,discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US are not authorized by NWPs 7, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 29,31,35,39,40,42,43,and 44 for any activity within,or directly affecting,critical resource waters, including wetlands adjacent to such waters. Discharges of dredged or fill materials into waters of the US may be authorized by the above NWPs in National Wild and Scenic Rivers if the activity complies with General Condition 7. Further,such discharges may be authorized in designated critical habitat for Federally listed threatened or endangered species if the activity complies with General Condition 11 and the USFWS or the'1MFS has concurred in a determination of compliance with this condition. (b)For NWPs 3,8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19,22,23,25,27,28,30,33,34,36,37,and 38,notification is required in accordance with General Condition 13,for any activity proposed in the designated critical resource waters including wetlands adjacent to those waters. The District Engineer may authorize activities under these NWPs only after it is determined that the impacts to the critical resource waters will be no more than minimal. 26. Fills Within 100-Year Floodplains. For purposes of this General Condition, 100-year floodplains will be identified through the existing Federal Emergency Management Agency's(FEMA)Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. (a)Discharges in Floodplain�Below Headwaters. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US within the mapped 100-year floodplain,below headwaters(i.e. five cfs),resulting in permanent above-grade fills, are not authorized by NWPs 39,40,42,43,and 44. (b)Dischar�es in Floodwav;Above Headwaters. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US within the FEMA or locally mapped floodway,resulting in permanent above-grade fills,are not authorized by NWPs 39,40,42,and 44. (c)The permittee must comply with any applicable FEMA-approved state or local floodplain management requirements. 27. Construction Perio�l. For activities that have not been verified by the Corps and the project was commenced or under contract to commence by the expiration date of the NWP(or modification or revocation date),the work must be completed within 12-months after such date(including any modification that affects the project). For activities that have been verified and the project was commenced or under contract to commence within the verification period,the work must be.completed by the date deternuned by the Corps. For projects that have been verified by the Corps,an extension of a Corps approved completion date may requested. This request must be submitted at least one month before the previously approved completion date. 8 Nationwide Permit Replacement Regional General Permit General Cunditions 1. Navigation. No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation. 2. Proper Maintenance. Any structure or fill authorized shall be properly maintained, includin� maintenance to ensure public safety. 3. Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls. Appropriate soil erosion and sediment coritrols must be used and maintained in effective operating condition during construction, and all exposed soil and other fills, as well as any work below the ordinary high water mark or high tide line, must be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable date. Permittees are encouraged to perform work within waters of the United States during periods of low-flow or no-flow. 4. Aquatic Life Movements. No activity may substantially disrupt the necessary life-cycle movements of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species that normally migrate through the area, unless the activity's primary purpose is to impound water. Culverts placed in streams must be installed to maintain low flow conditions. 5. Equipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands must be placed on mats, or other measures must be taken to minimize soil disturbance. 6. Regional and Case-By-Case Conditions. The activity must comply with any regional conditions that may have been added by the Division Engineer(see 33 CFR 330.4(e)) and with any case specific conditions added by the Corps or by the state or tribe in its Section 401 Water Quality Certification and Coastal Zone Management Act consistency determination. 7. Wild and Scenic Rivers. No activity may occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System; or in a river officially designated by Congress as a"study river" for possible inclusion in the system, while the river is in an official study status; unless the appropriate Federal agency, with direct management responsibility for such river, has determined in writing that the proposed activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation, or study status. Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be obtained from the appropriate Federal land management agency in the area(e.g., National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 8. Tribal Rights. No activity or its operation may impair reserved tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights. 9. Water Quality. (a) In certain states and tribal lands an individua1401 Water Quality Certification must be obtained or waived (See 33 CFR 330.4(c)). (b) For RGP categories C, E, G, and K, where the state or triba1401 certification (either generically or individually) does not require or approve water quality management measures, the permittee must provide water quality management measures that will ensure that the authorized �� work does not result in more than minimal degradation of water quality(or the Corps determines that compiiance with state or local standards, where applicable, will ensure no more than minimal adverse effect on water quality). An important component of�vater quality management includes stormwater management that minimizes degradation of the downstream aquatic system, including water quality(refer to Regional General Permit Condition 21 for stormwater management requirements). Another important component of water quality management is the establishment and maintenance of vegetated buffers next to open waters, including streams (refer to Regional General Permit Condition 19 for vegetated buffer requirements for the RGP Categories). This condition is only applicable to projects that have the potential to affect water quality. While appropriate measures must be taken, in most cases it is not necessary to conduct detailed studies to identify such measures or to require monitoring. 10. Coastal Zone Management. In certain states, an individual state coastal zone management consistency concurrence must be obtained or waived (see 33 CFR 330.4(d)). 11. Endangered Species. (a)No activity is authorized under any RGP category which is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species ar a species proposed for such designation, as identified under the Federal Endangered Species Act(ESA), or which will destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species. Non-federal permittees shall notify the District Engineer if any listed species or designated critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of the project, or is located in the designated critical habitat and shall not begin work on the activity until notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of the ESA have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. For activities that may affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species or designated critical habitat, the notification must include the name(s) of the endangered or threatened species that may be affected by the proposed work or that utilize the designated critical habitat that may be affected by the proposed work. As a result of formal or informal consultation with the FWS or NMFS the District Engineer may add species-specific regional endangered species conditions to the RGP categories. (b) Authorization of an activity by an RGP category does not authorize the "take" of a threatened or endangered species as defined under the ESA. In the absence of separate authorization(e.g., an ESA Section 10 Permit, a Biological Opinion with"incidental take" provisions, etc.) from the USFWS or the NMFS,both lethal and non-lethal "takes" of protected species are in violation of the ESA. Information on the location of threatened and endangered species and their critical habitat can be obtained directly from the offices of the USFWS and NMFS or their world wide web pages at http://www.fws.gov/r9endspp/endspp.html and http://www.nfms.noaa.gov/prot_res/overview/es.html respectively. 12. Historic Properties. No activity which may affect historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places is authorized, until the District Engineer has complied with the provisions of 33 CFR part 325,Appendix C. The prospective permittee must notify the District Engineer if the authorized activity may affect any historic properties listed, determined to be eligible, or which the prospective permittee has reason to believe may be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, and shall not begin the activity until notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. Information on the location and existence of historic resources can be obtained from the State Historic Preservation Office and the National Register of Historic Places (see 33 CFR 330.4(g)). For activities that may affect historic properties listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places, the notification must state which historic property may be affected by the proposed work or include a vicinity map indicating the location of the historic property. 13. Notification. (a) Timing; where required by the terms of the RGP category, the prospective permittee must notify the District Engineer with a preconstruction notification(PCl� as early as possible. The District Engineer must determine if the notification is complete within 30 days of the date of receipt and can request additional information necessary to make the PCN complete only once. However, if the prospective permittee does not provide all of the requested information, then the District Engineer will notify the prospective permittee that the notification is still incomplete and the PCN review process will not commence until all of the requested information has been received by the District Engineer. The prospective permittee shall not begin the activity: (1) Until notified in writing by the District Engineer that the activity may proceed under the RGP category with any special conditions imposed by the District or Division Engineer; or (2) If notified in writing by the District or Division Engineer that an Individual Permit is required; or (3) Unless 45 days have passed from the District Engineer's receipt of the complete notification and the prospective permittee has not received written notice from the District or Division Engineer. Subsequently, the permittee's right to proceed under the RGP category may be modified, suspended, or revoked only in accordance with the procedure set forth in 33 CFR 330.5(d)(2). (b) Contents of Notification: The notification must be in writing and include the following information: (1) Name, address and telephone numbers of the prospective permittee; (2) Location of the proposed project; (3) Brief description of the proposed project; the project's purpose; direct and indirect adverse environmental effects the proj ect would cause; any other Regional General Permit(s), or Individual Permit(s) used or intended to be used to authorize any part of the proposed project or any related activity. Sketches should be provided when necessary to show that the activity complies with the terms of the RGP category (Sketches usually clarify the project and when provided result in a quicker decision.); (4) For RGP categories C, E, G, and K, the PCN must also include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands, vegetated shallows (e.g., submerged aquatic vegetation, seagrass beds), and riffle and pool complexes (see paragraph 13(�); (5) For RGP category E (Linear Transportation Projects), the PCN must include a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset permanent losses of waters of the US and a statement describing how temporary losses of waters of the US will be minimized to the maximum extent practicable; (7) For RGP category I (Stream and Wetland Restoration Activities), the PCN must include documentation of the prior condition of the site that will be reverted by tne permittee; (8) For RGP category J (Single-Family Housing), the PCN must also include: (i) Any past use of this RGP or NtiVP 29 by the Individual Permittee andlor the permittee's spouse; (ii) A statement that the single-family housing activity is for a personal residence of the permittee; (iii) A description of the entire parcel, including its size, and a delineation of wetlands. For the purpose of this RGP category,parcels of land measuring 1/4-acre or less will not require a formal on-site delineation. However, the applicant shall provide an indication of where the wetlands are and the amount of wetlands that exists on the property. For parcels greater than 1/4-acre in size, a formal wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the current method required by the Corps. (See paragraph 13(fl); (iv) A written description of all land(including, if available, legal descriptions) owned by the prospective permittee and/or the prospective permittee's spouse, within a one mile radius of the parcel, in any form of ownership (including any land owned as a partner, corporation,joint tenant, co-tenant, or as a tenant-by-the-entirety) and any land on which a purchase and sale agreement or other contract for sale or purchase has been executed; (9) For RGP category K, the PCN must also include a written statement to the District Engineer explaining how avoidance and minimization for losses of waters of the US were achieved on the project site; (10) For RGP category K, the PCN must include a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset losses of waters of the US or justification explaining why compensatory mitigation should not be required. For discharges that cause the loss of greater than 3001inear feet of an intermittent stream bed, to be authorized, the District Engineer must determine that the activity complies with the other terms and conditions of the RGP category, determine adverse environmental effects are minimal both individually and cumulatively, and waive the limitation on stream impacts in writing before the permittee may proceed; (11) For activities that may adversely affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species, the PCN must include the name(s) of those endangered or threatened species that may be affected by the proposed work or utilize the designated critical habitat that may be affected by the proposed work; and (12) For activities that may affect historic properties listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places, the PCN must state which historic property may be affected by the proposed work or include a vicinity map indicating the location of the historic property. (c) Form of Notification: The standard Individual Permit application form(Form ENG 4345)may be used as the notification but must clearly indicate that it is a PCN and must include all of the information required in(b) (1)-(12) of Regional General Pernut Condition 13. A letter containing the requisite information may also be used. (d) District Engineer's Decision: In reviewing the PCN for the proposed activity,the District Engineer will determine whether the activity authorized by the RGP will result in more than minimal individual or cumulative adverse environmental effects or may be contrary to the �ublic interest. The p�ospective permittee may submit a proposed mitigation plan with the PCN to expedite the process. The District Engineer will consider any proposed compensatory mitigation the applicant has included in the proposal in determining whether the net adverse environmental effects to the aquatic environment of the proposed work are minimal. If the District Engineer determines that the activity complies �vith the terms and conditions of the RGP and that the adverse effects on the aquatic environment are minimal, after considering mitigation, the District Engineer will notify the permittee and include any conditions the District Engineer deems necessary. The District Engineer must approve any compensatory mitigation proposal before the permittee commences work. If the prospecti��e permittee is required to submit a compensatory mitigation proposal with the PCN, the proposal may be either conceptual or detailed. If the prospective permittee elects to submit a compensatory mitigation plan with the PCN, the District Engineer will expeditiously review the proposed compensatory mitigation plan. The District Engineer must review the plan within 45 days of receiving a complete PCN and determine whether the conceptual or specific proposed mitigation would ensure no more than minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environment. If the net adverse effects of the project on the aquatic environment (after consideration of the compensatory mitigation proposal) are determined by the District Engineer to be minimal, the District Engineer will provide a timely written response to the applicant. The response will state that the project can proceed under the terms and conditions of the RGP. If the District Engineer determines that the adverse effects of the proposed work are more than minimal, then the District Engineer will notify the applicant either: (1) That the project does not qualify for authorization under the RGP and instruct the applicant on the procedures to seek authorization under an Individual Permit; (2) that the project is authorized under the RGP subject to the applicant's submission of a mitigation proposal that would reduce the adverse effects on the aquatic environment to the minimal level; or(3) that the project is authorized under the RGP with specific modifications or conditions. Where the District Engineer determines that mitigation is required to ensure no more than minimal adverse effects occur to the aquatic environment,the activity will be authorized within the 45-day PCN period. The authorization will include the necessary conceptual or specific mitigation or a requirement that the applicant submit a mitigation proposal that would reduce the adverse effects on the aquatic environment to the minirnal level. When conceptual mitigation is included, or a mitigation plan is required under item (2) above, no work in waters of the US will occur until the District Engineer has approved a specific mitigation plan. (e) Agency Coordination: The District Engineer will consider any comments from Federal and state agencies concerning the proposed activity's compliance with the terms and conditions of the RGP and the need for mitigation to reduce the project's adverse environmental effects to a minimal level. For activities requiring notification to the District Engineer that result in the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of waters of the US, the District Engineer will provide immediately(e.g., via facsimile transmission, overnight mail, or other expeditious manner) a copy to the appropriate Federal or state offices (CTSFWS, state natural resource or water quality agency, EPA, State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO), and, if appropriate, the NMFS). These agencies will then have 10 calendar days from the date the material is transmitted to telephone or fax the District Engineer notice that they intend to provide substantive, site-specific comments. If so contacted by an agency, the District Engineer will wait an additional 15 calendar days before making a decision on the notification. The District Engineer will fully consider agency comments received within the specified time frame, but will provide no response to the resourcc agcncy, c;�cept as provided below. The District Engineer will indicate in the administrative record associated with each notification that the resource agencies' concerns were considered. As required by sectioz� 30�(b)(4)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the District Engineer will provide a response to 1��IFS within 30 days of receipt of any Essential Fish Habitat conservation recommendations. Applicants are encouraged to provide the Corps multiple copies of notifications to expedite agency notification. (� Wetland Delineations: Wetland delineations must be prepared in accordance with the current method required by the CoYps (For RGP category J see paragraph (b)(9)(iii) for parcels less than (1/4-acre in size). The permittee may ask the Corps to delineate the special aquatic site. There may be some delay if the Corps does the delineation. Furthermore, the 45-day period will not start until the wetland delineation has been completed and submitted to the Corps, where appropriate. 14. Compliance Certification. Every permittee who has received RGP verification from the Corps will submit a signed certification regazding the completed work and any required mitigation. The certification will be forwarded by the Corps with the authorization letter and will include: (a) A statement that the authorized work was done in accordance with the Corps authorization, including any general or specific conditions; (b)A statement that any required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions; and (c) The signature of the permittee certifying the completion of the work and mitigation. 15. Use of Multiple Regional General Permits. The use of more than one RGP for a single and complete project is prohibited, except when the acreage loss of waters of the US authorized by the RGP does not exceed the acreage limit of the RGP category with the highest specified acreage limit (e.g. if a road crossing over tidal waters is constructed under RGP category E, with associated bank stabilization authorized by RGP category D, the maximum acreage loss of waters of the US for the total project cannot exceed 1/3-acre). 16. Water Supply Intakes. No activity, including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of dredged or fill material, may occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake except where the activity is for repair of the public water supply intake structures or adjacent bank stabilization. 17. Shellfish Beds. No activity, including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of dredged or fill material,may occur in areas of concentrated shellfish populations, unless the activity is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by NWP 4. 18. Suitable Material. No activity, including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of dredged or fill material, may consist of unsuitable material (e.g., trash, debris, car bodies, asphalt, etc.) and material used for construction or discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts (see section 307 of the CWA). 19. Mitigation. The District Engineer will consider the factors discussed below when determining the acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to offset adverse effects on the aquatic environment that are more than minimal. (a) The project must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects to waters of the US to the maximum extent practicable at the project site(i.e., on site). (b) Mitigation in all its forms (avoiding, minimizing, rectifying,reducing or compensating) will be required to the extent necessary to ensure that the adverse effects to the a�ivatic environment ai-�minimal. (c) Compensatory mitigation at a minimum one-for-one ratio will be required for all wetland impacts requiring a PCN, unless the District Engineer determines in writing that some other form of mitigation would be more environmentally appropriate and provides a project- specific waiver of this requirement. Consistent with National policy, the District Engineer will establish a preference for restoration of wetlands as compensatory mitigation, with preservation used only in exceptional circumstances. (d) Compensatory mitigation (i.e., replacement or substitution of aquatic resources for those impacted) will not be used to increase the acreage losses allowed by the acreage limits of some of the or RGP categories. For example, 1/4-acre of wetlands cannot be created to change a 3/4-acre loss of wetlands to a 1/2-acre loss associated with RGP category K verification. However, 1/2-acre of created wetlands can be used to reduce the impacts of a 1/2-acre loss of wetlands to the minimum impact level in order to meet the minimal impact requirement associated with RGP categories. (e) To be practicable, the mitigation must be available and capable of being done considering costs, existing technology, and logistics in light of the overall project purposes. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values,preferably in the same watershed. (� Compensatory mitigation plans for projects in or near streams or other open waters will normally include a requirement for the establishment, maintenance, and legal protection (e.g., easements, deed restrictions) of vegetated buffers to open waters. In many cases, vegetated buffers will be the only compensatory mitigation required. Vegetated buffers should consist of native species. The width of the vegetated buffers required will address documented water quality or aquatic habitat loss concerns. Normally, the vegetated buffer will be 25 to 50 feet wide on each side of the stream, but the District Engineers may require slightly wider vegetated buffers to address documented water quality or habitat loss concerns. Where both wetlands and open waters exist on the project site, the Corps will determine the appropriate compensatory mitigation (e.g., stream buffers or wetlands compensation) based on what is best for the aquatic environment on a watershed basis. In cases where vegetated buffers are determined to be the most appropriate form of compensatory mitigation, the District Engineer may waive or reduce the requirement to provide wetland compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts. (g) Compensatory mitigation proposals submitted with the "notification"may be either conceptual or detailed. If conceptual plans are approved under the verification, then the Corps will condition the verification to require detailed plans be submitted and approved by the Corps prior to construction of the authorized activity in waters of the U.S. (h) Permittees may propose the use of mitigation banks, in-lieu fee arrangements or scparate activity-specific compensatory mitigation. In all cases that require compensatory mitigation, the mitigation provisions will specify the party responsible for accomplishing and/or complying with the mitigation plan. 20. Spawning Areas. Activities, including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of dredged or fill material, in spawning areas during spawning seasons must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. Activities that result in the physical destruction (e.g., excavate, fill, or smother downstream by substantial turbidity) of an important spawning area are not authorized. 21. Management of Water Flows. To the m�imum extent practicable, the activity must be designed to maintain preconstruction downstream flow conditions (e.g., location, capacity, and flow rates). Furthermore, the activity must not permanently restrict or impede the passage of normal or expected high flows (unless the primary purpose of the fill is to impound waters) and the structure or discharge of dredged or fill material must withstand expected high flows. The activity must, to the maximum extent practicable,provide for retaining excess flows from the site,provide for maintaining surface flow rates from the site similar to preconstruction conditions, and provide for not increasing water flows from the project site, relocating water, or redirecting water flow beyond preconstruction conditions. Stream channelizing will be reduced to the minimal amount necessary, and the activity must, to the maximum extent practicable, reduce adverse effects such as flooding or erosion downstream and upstream of the project site, unless the activity is part of a larger system designed to manage water flows. In most cases, it will not be a requirement to conduct detailed studies and monitoring of water flow. This condition is only applicable to projects that have the potential to affect waterflows. While appropriate measures must be taken, it is not necessary to conduct detailed studies to identify such measures or require monitoring to ensure their effectiveness. Normally, the Corps will defer to state and local authorities regarding management of water flow. 22. Adverse Effects From Impoundments. If the activity creates an impoundment of water, adverse effects to the aquatic system due to the acceleration of the passage of water, and/or the restricting its flow shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. This includes structures and work in navigable waters of the US, or discharges of dredged or fill material. 23. Waterfowl Breeding Areas. Activities, including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of dredged or fill material, into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl must be avoided to the m�imum extent practicable. 24. Removal of Temporary Fills. Any temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to their preexisting elevation. 25. Designated Critical Resource Waters. Critical resource waters include,NOAA-designated marine sanctuaries, National Estuarine Research Reserves,National Wild and Scenic Rivers, critical habitat for Federally listed threatened and endangered species, coral reefs, state natural heritage sites, and outstanding national resource waters or other waters officially designated by a state as having particular environmental or ecological significance and identified by the District Engineer after notice and opportunity for public comment. The District Engineer may also designate additional critical resource waters after notice and opportunity for cominent. {a) EYCept as noted below, discharges of dred�ed or fill material into waters of the US ar;, not authorized by RGP categories C, E, J, and K ior any activity within, or directly a�:lecting, critical resource waters, including wetlands adjacent to such waters. Discharges of dredged or fill materials into waters of the US may be authorized by the above RGP categories in National Wild and Scenic Rivers if the activity complies with Regional General Permit Condition 7. Further, such discharges may be authorized in designated critical habitat for Federally listed threatened or endangered �pecies if the activity complies with Regional General Permit Condition 11 and the liSFWS or the NMFS has concurred in a determination of compliance with this condition. (b) For RGP categories A, D, G, H, and I, notification is required in accordance with Regional General Permit Condition 13, for any activity proposed in the designated critical resource waters including wetlands adjacent to those waters. The District Engineer may authorize activities under these RGP categories only after it is determined that the impacts to the critical resource waters will be no more than minimal. 26. Fills Within 100-Year Floodplains. For purposes of this Regional General Permit Condition, 100-year floodplains will be identified through the existing Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. (a) Discharges in Floodplain; Below Headwaters. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US within the mapped 100-year floodplain, below headwaters (i.e. five cfs), resulting in permanent above-grade fills, are not authorized by RGP category K. (b) Discharges in Floodway; Above Headwaters. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US within the FEMA or locally mapped floodway, resulting in permanent above-grade fills, are not authorized by RGP category K. (c) The permittee must comply with any applicable FEMA-approved state or local floodplain management requirements. 27. Construction Period. For activities that have not been verified by the Corps and the project was commenced or under contract to commence by the expiration date of the RGP category(or modification or revocation date), the work must be completed within 12-months after such date (including any modification that affects the project). For activities that have been verified and the project was commenced or under contract to commence within the verification period, the work must be completed by the date determined by the Corps. For proj ects that have been verified by the Corps, an extension of a Corps approved completion date maybe requested. This request must be submitted at least one month before the previously approved completion date. Section 401 Water Qualitv Certification Part A- General Conditions 1. Duration of Certification-This 401 WQC shall remain in effect until the RGP expires or the NWP categories it covers are again considered for re-issue and certification as part of a Nationwide package. 2. This section 401 Water Quality Certification does not authorize any site preparation activity for development or placement of water control structures in tidal waters or wetlands adjacent to tidal waters. 3. Turbidity Control: The following conditions relating to turbidity shall be observed: a. Except as allowed in Condition 3(b) or 3(c) [below],the authorized work shall not cause turbidity of affected waters to exceed natural background turbidity by 10 percent,measured 100 feet downstream from the activity causing turbidity. b. For projects in streams where the gradient is less than or equal to 2 percent(rise/run), monitoring shall take place at no less than 4-hour intervals during active, in-water work. Where erosion control measures specified in General Condition 4 of this WQC have been implemented,the turbidity standard specified in General Condition 3(a)may be exceeded for a maximum of 1 (one)monitoring interval per 24-hour work period. c. For projects in streams where the gradient is greater than 2 percent(rise/run), monitoring shall take place at no less than 2-hour intervals during active, in-water work. Where erosion control measures specified in General Condition 4 of this certification have been implemented,the turbidity standard specified in General Condition 3(a)may be exceeded for a maximum of 2 (two)hours. d. For projects impacting streams, water quality monitoring points shall be established at an undisturbed site representing background conditions approximately100-feet upstream from the point of permitted work, and at a point approximately100-feet downstream from the point of permitted activity in the visible plume, if one is present. Other monitoring locations may be authorized by the Corps if access is problematic. A turbidimeter is recommended for measuring; however,visual gauging is acceptable. If ineasured visually, turbidity that is visible over background is considered an exceedance of the standard. e. The person(s)conducting the monitoring shall be responsible for immediately notifying the permit holder or the permit holder's on-site representative of any exceedance of the turbidity standard and shall keep a record of the exceedance.If a 10 percent exceedance of the background level occurs at 100 feet below the project site,turbidity control measures shall be improved or additional conh-ols shall be implemented until the turbidity standard is met. Monitoring shall continue at prescribed compliance intervals. If exceedances caused by the permitted activity occur during two consecutive measurements, the activity causing the turbidity shall stop until appropriate abatement techniques bring the project back into compliance. 4. Erosion Control: The applicant is referred to DEQ's Oregon Sediment and Erosion Control Manual, April 2005. T'he following erosion control measures (and others as appropriate) or comparable measures as specified in an NPDES 1200-C permit(if required) shall be implemented: a. Filter bags, sediment traps or catch basins, vegetative strips,berms,Jersey barriers, fiber blankets,bonded fiber matrices, geotextiles,mulches,wattles, sediment fences, or other measures used in combination shall be used to prevent movement of soil from uplands into waterways or wetlands; �� b. An adequate supply of materials needed to control erosion must be maintained at the project construction site; c. To prevent stockpile erosion, use compost berms, impervious materials or other equally effective methods, during rain e��ents or tivhen the stockpile site is not moved or reshaped for more than 48 hours; d. Erosion control measures shall be inspected and maintained daily, or more frequently as necessary,to ensure their continued effectiveness and shall remain in place until all exposed soil is stabilized; i. If monitoring or inspection shows that the erosion and sediment controls are ineffective,mobilize work crews immediately to make repairs, install replacements, or install additional controls as necessary. ii. Remove sediment from erosion and sediment controls once it has reached 1/3 of the exposed height of the control. e. Unless part of the authorized permanent fill, all construction access points through, and staging areas in,riparian or wetland areas shall use removable pads or mats to prevent soil compaction. However, in some wetland areas under dry summer conditions, this requirement may be waived upon approval by the Corps. £ Dredged or other excavated material shall be placed on upland areas with stable slopes to prevent materials from eroding back into waterways or wetlands; g. Sediment from disturbed areas or able to be tracked by vehicles onto pavement shall not be allowed to leave the site in amounts that would reasonably be expected to enter waters of the state and impair water quality. Placement of clean aggregate at all construction entrances, and other Best Management Practices(BMPs) such as truck or wheel washes if needed,will be used when earth moving equipment will be leaving the site and traveling on paved surfaces; and, h. Existing stormwater inlets or catch basins located downslope of the work area must be protected with sediment control measures to prevent debris and turbid flows from reaching waters of the state. 5. Deleterious Materials: The following conditions relating to control of hazardous,toxic and waste materials shall be observed: a. Treated Wood: Ineligibility-Projects which use chemically treated wood that will contact surface or ground water or that will be placed over water where it will be exposed to abrasion require individual, site specific review and are, therefore,not certified by this 401 WQC. b. Projects that require removal of chemically treated wood must: i. Ensure that no treated wood debris falls into waters of the State. If treated wood debris falls into waters of the State, it must be removed immediately. ii. Dispose of all treated wood debris removed during a project,including treated wood pilings,at an upland facility approved for hazardous materials of this classification. Do not leave a treated wood piling in the water or stacked on the streambank. c. Biologically harmful materials and construction debris including, but not limited to: petroleum products, chemicals,cement cured less than 24 hours, welding slag and grindings, concrete saw cutting by-products, sandblasted materials,chipped paint, tires,wire, steel posts, asphalt and waste concrete shall not be placed in waterways or wetlands. Authorized fill material must be free of these materials. The applicant must remove all foreign materials, refuse, and waste from the project azea. d. An adequate supply of materials needed to contain deleterious matenals during a weather event must be maintained at the project construction site. e. Machinery refueling shall not occur in watenvays or wetlands or their riparian areas. Refer to General Condition 6 for refueling specifics. 6. Spill Prevention and Staging Activities: Fuel, operate, maintain, and store vehicles and conshuction materials in areas that minimize disturban�e to habitat and prevent adverse effects from potential fuel spills. a. Limit �taging areas to the minimum size necessary to complete the project. To reduce the staging area and potential for contamination, er.�ure that only enough supplies and equipment to complete a specific task will be stored on-site. b. Complete vehicle staging, cleaning,maintenance,refueling, and fuel storage in a vehicle staging area placed 150 feet or more from any waters of the State, unless this distance is not appropriate because of the following site conditions: i. Physical constraints that make this distance not feasible (e.g., steep slopes,rock outcroppings). ii. Natural resource features would be degraded as a result of this setback. iii. Equal or greater spill containment and effect avoidance if staging area is less than 150 feet of any waters of the State. c. If staging areas are within 150 feet of any waters of the State, full containment of potential contaminants shall be provided to prevent soil and water contamination, as appropriate. d. Inspect all vehicles operated within 150 feet of any waters of the State daily for fluid leaks before leaving the vehicle staging area. Repair any leaks detected in the vehicle staging area before the vehicle resumes operation. Document inspections in a record that is available for review on request by the appropriate Regulatory Authorities. e. Before operations begin and as often as necessary during operation, steam clean(or an approved equal) all equipment that will be used below bankfull elevation until all visible extemal oil, grease,mud, and other visible contaminates are removed. f. Diaper all stationary power equipment(e.g., generators,cranes, stationary drilling equipment) operated within 150 feet of any waters of the state to prevent leaks, unless other suitable containment is provided to prevent potential spills from entering any waters of the state. g. An adequate supply of materials(such as straw matting/bales, geotextiles,booms, diapers, and other absorbent matcrials)needed to control erosion and/or to contain deleterious materials during a weather event must be maintained at the project construction site. 7. Spill Reporting: Project-related spills that enter waters of the state or onto land with a potential to enter waters of the state shall be reported to the Oregon Emergency Response System(OERS)at 800-452-0311. 8. Construction Process Water: Water from any construction site may not be discharged directly to an unpermitted stormwater system,or to any other conveyance system leading directly to a water of the state. Adverse affects to water quality from construction water with pollutants(e.g., concrete washout, hydromilling,pumping for work area isolation, vehicle wash water, drilling fluids)must be avoided: a. Process water containment-Design,build, and maintain facilities to collect and treat all construction discharge water, including any contaminated water produced by drilling, using the best available technology applicable to site conditions. Provide treatment to remove debris,nutrients, sediment,petroleum hydrocarbons,metals, and other pollutants likely to be present. An alternative to treatment is collection and proper disposal offsite; b. Drilling Discharge-All drilling equipment, drill recovery and recycling pits, and any waste or spoil produccd, will be completely isolated,recovered, then recycled or disposed of tu prevent entry into waters of the state. Recycling using a tank instead of drill recovery/recycling pits, is preferable; � c. When drilling is completed, attempts will be made to remove the remaining drilling fluid from the sleeve (e.g.,by pumping)to reduce turbidity when the sleeve is removed. 9. Fish Avoidance: Minimize water quality impacts and adverse effects to fish species from in-water work activities. a. Timing of In-water Work-All work below the OHW elevation, or bankfull elevation, including temporary fills or structures, shall occur within the time periods recommended by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife(ODFW) for in-water work specified in the most current version of Oregon Guidelines or Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources. Any exception to the Guidelines shall require specific approval from the Corps after consultation with ODFW,and where required,USFWS and/or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS,NOAA Fisheries). b. Cessation of Work-Cease project operations under high flow conditions that may result in inundation of the project area, except for efforts to avoid or minimize turbidity or other resource damage as a result of the exposed project area. c. Fish Passa�e-Provide passage for any adult or juvenile migratory fish species present in the project area during and after construction, for the life of the project, and as approved in writing by the appropriate resource and regulatory agencies including ODFW,USFWS, and NMFS. Upstream passage is not required during construction if it did not previously exist. d. Isolation of In-water Work Area-If adult or juvenile fish are reasonably certain to be present, if spawning habitats are reasonably likely to be impaired(e.g. work area is within 300 feet or as required by ODFW),or as needed to protect beneficial uses, complete isolation of the work area from the active flowing stream using inflatable bags, geo blocks, sandbags, sheet pilings, or similar materials,is required unless otherwise approved in writing by the appropriate Regulatory Authorities. The applicant is referred to DEQ's Oregon Sediment and Erosion Control Manual, Apri12005, for isolation techniques. 10. Site Restoration: Riparian and Wetland Yegetation Protection and Restoration- Vegetation associated with waters of the state, including wetlands, is absolutely essential in preserving and enhancing water quality. In many cases this includes vegetation on adjacent upland buffer areas. Therefore riparian, wetland, and shoreline vegetation in the project area shall be protected from unauthorized disturbance, or, if authorized work results in unavoidable disturbance, shall be restored and enhanced. The applicant must protect or restore habitat access, water quality,production of habitat elements, channel conditions, flows,watershed conditions, and other ecosystem processes that form and maintain productive habitats. Preparation and implementation of a Site Restoration Plan may be required to ensure that all habitats and accesses (e.g., streambanks, soils,large woody material, and vegetation) disturbed by the project are restored. a. Site Restoration Plan Requirements-Consistent with OAR 141-085-0171, when impacts to existing vegetation are anticipated as a result of the proposed activities,and the impacts will not require mitigation because they are considered temporary,the applicant must provide a rehabilitation plan for temporary impacts which includes the following: i. Existing and proposed contours. ii. Existing physical and biological characteristics, including vegetation. iii. Geomorphology and habitat features of stream or other open waters. iv. Areas oi temporary-impacts associated with const�-uction staging and access. v. Restoration goals and objectives r.ecessary to restore lost functions. vi. A planting plan appropriate to the geographic area which demonstrates ho�� the applicant will replace or enhance riparian vegetative function. vii. A plan to control exotic invasive vegetation; viii. An irrigation plan, including water supply source, if necessary. b. General Conditions relating to site disturbance: i. All exposed soils must be stabilized during and after construction to prevent erosion and sedi�rientation. ii. All disturbed areas shall be returned to original ground contours at project completion. iii. There shall be no operation of equipment such that machinery drives into the water. Work must be conducted from the top of the bank or in the dry. iv. No removal of vegetation shall occur outside the construction corridor or project footprint. v. At project completion soil exposed by construction activity must be stabilized by mulching and native vegetative plantings/seeding. Sterile grass may be used instead of native vegetation for temporary sediment control. If soils are to remain exposed more than seven days after completion of the permitted work, they must be covered with erosion control mats, or an equally effective erosion control technique until vegetative stabilization is achieved. vi. Woody vegetation removed or destroyed as a result of project construction shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 with native trees and shrubs or as appropriate to the geographic area within the first planting season after project completion, consistent with OAR 141-085-0171. vii. There shall be 80% survival of planted trees and shrubs, and 80% cover of planted or naturally recruited native herbaceous cover for 5 years following planting. viii.Failure to comply with site restoration requirements may result in additional compensatory mitigation. c. General Considerations: i. Streambank shapin�. Restore damaged streambanks to a natural slope,pattern and profile suitable for establishment of permanent woody vegetation,unless precluded by pre-project conditions(e.g., a natural rock wall). ii. Revegetation. Replant or reseed each area requiring revegetation before the end of the first planting season following construction.Use a diverse assemblage of species native to the project area or region, unless approved in writing by the appropriate Regulatory Authorities. Impacted streambank vegetation shall be replaced to the line of non-aquatic vegetation. Restored vegetation in adversely affected wetlands shall extend to the upland limits of the wetland area. iii. Pesticides.No pesticides, including herbicides,will be allowed within 150 feet of waters of the State or a greater distance as determined by current case law. Mechanical, hand, or other methods may be used to control weeds and unwanted vegetation. iv. Fertilizer. Do not apply surface fertilizer within 50 feet of any stream channel, unless approved in writing by the appropriate Regulatory Authorities. v. Fencin�. Install wildlife-friendly fencing as necessary to prevent access to revegetated sites by livestock or unauthorized persons. vi. Source of Materials. Obtain boulders, rock, woody materials and other natural construction materials used for the project outside the bankfull elevation and at least 150 feet from any waters of the State, except for native materials obtained from within the project footprint to be stockpiled and reused on site. (1) If possible, leave native materials where they are found. (2) If native materials (e.g., downed wood) are damaged or destroyed, replace them with a functional equivalent during site restoration. (3) Stockpile all large wood,native vegetation, weed-free topsoil, and native channel material displaced by construction for use during site restoration in- channel, in the riparian area, or in adjacent uplands, as appropriate. d. Rehabilitation Plan Contents. Use of the following design elements, while discretionary, may lead to more successful rehabilitation efforts. i. Desi�n Considerations. These guidelines may be used to develop a design plan and to aid in restoration goal assessment. While no single element is sufficient to measure success,the intent is that these features should be present within reasonable limits of natural and management variation: (1) Bare soil spaces that approximate the size and dispersal pattern of pre- existing conditions; (2) Soil movement, such as active rills or gullies and soil deposition around plants or in small basins,is absent or slight and local; (3) If areas with past erosion are present, they are completely stabilized and healed; (4) Plant litter is well distributed and effective in protecting the soil with few or no litter dams present; (5) Native woody and herbaceous vegetation,and gernunation microsites, are present and well distributed across the site; (6) Vegetation structure is resulting in rooting throughout the pre-existing, available soil profile; (7) Plants have normal,vigorous growth form, and a high probability of remaining vigorous,healthy and dominant over undesired competing vegetation; (8) Streambanks have less than 5% exposed soils with margins anchored by deeply rooted vegetation or coarse-grained alluvial debris. 11. Projects employing sumps or dry wells for groundwater discharge must conform to OAR 340-044-050. Contact Barbara Priest,DEQ,at 503-229-5945 for more information. 12. DEQ reserves the option to modify,amend, or revoke this 401 WQC for any or all activities or categories of activities, in the event that: a. New information indicates that the certified activities are having a signi£icant adverse impact on state water quality or aquatic resources; b. State water quality standards,criteria,or beneficial uses are amended through rulemaking; or, c. A proposed activity is necessitated by natural or human caused events which result in sudden structural damage threatening human health and safety and deternuned by the Corps or DEQ to be an emergency. Section =�01 `�ater Qualit� Certification Part B- :�ctivity Specific Conditions 1. Streambank Stabilization and Protection-Avoid and minimize adverse effects to natural stream and floodplain function by limiting streambank protection actions to those that are not expected to have long-terrn adverse effects on aquatic habitats. Whether these actions will also be adequate to meet other streambank protection objectives depends on the mechanisms of streambank failure operating at site-and reach-scale. a. Ineligibility- rhe following streambank stabilization activities are not certified by this 401 WQC: i. Any streambank stabilization project equal to or greater than 250 continuous linear feet of bank disturbance; ii. Any streambank stabilization project that involves the placement of more than 1 cubic yard of rock per linear foot below the OHW; iii. Permanent placement of material in wetlands adjacent to a stabilization project; iv. Placement of toe rock in constructed strearn channel trenches where bioengineering is not a feature of the project [unless specified below in c., ii., (1) through(5) below]; v. Placement of new vertical structures such as retaining walls,bulkheads, gabions or similar structures. b. Choice of Techniques-The following bank protection techniques are approved for use individually or in combination: i. Woody plantings and variations(e.g., live stakes,brush layering, facines,brush mattresses). ii. Herbaceous cover,where analysis of available records(e.g.,historical accounts and photographs)shows that trees or shrubs did not exist on the site within historic times,primarily for use on small streams or adjacent wetlands. iii. Deformable soil reinforcement, consisting of soil layers or lifts strengthened with fabric and vegetation that are mobile(`deformable')at approximately two-to five- year recurrence flows. iv. Coir logs (long bundles of coconut fiber), straw bales, and straw logs used individually or in stacks to trap sediment and provide growth medium for riparian plants. v. Bank reshaping and slope grading, when used to reduce a bank slope angle without changing the location of its toe, increase roughness and cross-section, and provide more favorable planting surfaces. vi. Floodplain roughness (e.g., floodplain tree and large woody debris rows, live siltation fences,brush traverses,brush rows, and live brush sills) used to reduce the likelihood of avulsion in areas where natural floodplain roughness is poorly developed or has been removed. vii. Floodplain flow spreaders, consisting of one or more rows of trees and accumulated debris used to spread flow across the floodplain. viii.Flow-redirection structures known as barbs,vanes, or bendway weirs,when designed as follows,and as otherwise approved in writing by the appropriate Regulatory Authorities. (1) No part of the flow-redirection structure may exceed bank full elevation, including all rock buried in the bank key. (2) Build the flow-redirection structure primarily of wood or otherwise incorporate laroe wood at a suitable elevation in an exposed portion of the structure or the bank key. Placing the large woody debris near streambanks in the depositional area between flow direction structures to satisfy this requirement is not approved, unless those areas are likely to be greater than 3 feet in depth, sufficient for target-species rearing habitats. (3} Fill the trench excavated for the bank key above bankfull elevation with soil and topped with native vegetation. (4) The maximum flow-redirection structure length will not exceed 1/4 of the bankfull channel width. (5) Place rock individually without end dumping,unless approved in writing by the appropriate Regulatory Authorities. (6) If two or more flow-redirection structures are built in a series,place the flow-redirection structure farthest upstream within 150 feet or 2.5 bankfull channel widths, from the flow-redirection structure farthest downstream. (7) Include woody riparian planting as a project component. c. Use of Large Wood and Rock-Whenever possible, use large wood as an integral component of streambank protection treatments. Avoid or minimize the use of rock, stone, and similar materials. i. Large wood will be intact,hard,and undecayed to partly decaying with untrimmed root wads to provide functional refugia habitat for fish. Use of decayed or fragmented wood found lying on the ground or partially sunken in the ground is not acceptable. ii. Rock may be used instead of wood for the following purposes and structures. The rock may not impair natural stream flows into or out of secondary channels or riparian wetlands. Whenever feasible,place topsoil over the rock and plant with woody vegetation. (1) As ballast to anchor or stabilize large woody debris components of an approved bank treatment. (2) To fill scour holes, as necessary to protect the integrity of the project, if the rock is limited to the depth of the scour hole and does not extend above the channel bed. (3) To construct a footing, facing,head wall, or other protection necessary to prevent scouring or downcutting of, or slope erosion or failure at, an exi.stin� structure(e.g., culvert,utility line,roadway or bridge support)to be repaired. (4) To construct a flow-redirection structure as described above. (5) In projects maintaining existing transportation related structures when an ODOT or other registered professional engineer identifies rock alone as the only effective method due to site specific geotechnical or hydraulic concems. 2. Stormwater Management for RGP activities involving impervious surfaces Stormwater discharges to waters of the state must not violate state water quality standards, including Oregon Administrative Rule(OAR)340-041-0004, the Antidegradation Policy for Surface Water. Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plans: Levels of post-construction stormwater management planning for the RGP 401 WQC are determined by project scope, location, and reasonable expectation tliat increased pollutant loads will enter wat�rs of the state. Making a determination as to level of detail required in a stormwater plan is described by the follo�,ving tiered system: a. Description of Tiers- to determine appropriate level of post-construction stormwater management planning necessary, use one of the following: i. Tier 1 Project- A project located within a community p�.rmitted under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Strategy (NPDES)Phase I or II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System(�IS4) and discharging to the municipal system. If the applicant does not plan to discharge into the permitted municipal system, they must use Tier 2 or Tier 3; ii. Tier 2 Project-Outside MS4 areas, and total site disturbance less than one acre, and no increase in pollutant loads or increased runoff to waters of the state; A. New and associated impervious area]ess than or equal to 500 square feet; maintenance of existing structures which qualify for RGP A(Maintenance); or projects which qualify for RGP J(Single Family Housing); or, B. Site development activities with new and associated impervious area greater than 500 square feet. If the applicant is uncertain of effects or is unable to demonstrafe that increased stormwater resulting from the project will have minimal effect on pollutant loads in waters of the state,they should use Tier 3; iii. Tier 3 Project-Outside MS4 areas, and total site disturbance one acre or greater; I A. New and associated impervious area less than or equal to 500 square feet; or, B. New and associated impervious area greater than 500 square feet. b. Documentation Required- The above described Projects, Tiers 1, 2, and 3, require the following documentation to demonstrate that post construction stormwater will be managed to attain compliance with state water quality standards. Failure to provide the documentation described below removes the project from eligibility for certification under this 401 WQC. i. Tier 1 Projects- Require documentation from the MS4 Phase UII municipality that post construction stormwater discharged from the project site will be accepted into the municipal system, or a statement from the applicant that a request has been submitted to the municipality to accept project stormwater. Projects may receive a conditional permit from the Corps which will become final only with proof of approval of stormwater acceptance by the Phase UII municipality. ii. Tier 2A and Tier 3A Projects-The applicant must submit a post-construction Stormwater Management Plan (the applicant is referred to the DEQ Stormwater Management Plan Submission Guidelines for Removal/Fill Permit Applications Which Involve Impervious Surfaces). It is anticipated that stormwater plans for Tier 2A and Tier 3A projects will entail a short narrative paragraph and a rudimentary drawing which include the following elements or justification for those elements which may not be applicable: (1) A site sketch or plan view drawing indicating the drainage flow directions, and discharge locations, contours or spot elevations(preferably both) showing direction of stream and surface flow and location and size of proposed facilities (e.g.,parking lots, driveways,buildings, or roads) and nearest downstream waterbody, other physical features of the site, and the location and type of construction and post-construction BMPs; (2) BMPs— a. A description of proposed BMPs and a summary of their anticipated eperation to insure adequate capacity, proper function, and appropriate design for the site such that quality, quantity, and seasonality of pre- construction hydrologic conditions are mimicked to the maximum extent practicable,based on stormwater anticipated to be generated due to project-related impervious surfaces and delivered to waters of the state. See local jurisdiction regulations and accepted stormwater manuals for � detention and capacity requirements; b. A BMP implementation schedule, operation and maintenance plan, and designation of a party or agency with documentation of their agreement for responsibility for post-construction BMP maintenance; and, c. A plan for removal, recycling and disposal of temporary BMPs which are not intended for post-construction use; or in lieu of(2) a,b,&c, d. Reference to implementation of a programmatic process developed to achieve these expectations, and aclrnowledged by DEQ as adequately addressing pollution control or reduction through basin-wide post- construction storrmwater management practices. (3) If engineered structural BMPs are incorporated into the post construction stormwater management plan they must be prepared and stamped by an Oregon registered Professional Engineer(PE). (4) The applicant must submit a copy of the Stormwater Management Plan to both the Corps and DEQ. iii. Tier 2B& Tier 3B Projects- It is anticipated that stormwater plan narrative and drawings for Tier 2B and Tier 3B projects will be more detailed and specific than stormwater plans for Tier 2A and Tier 3A projects. An initial,conceptual plan which describes intended stormwater management but lacks engineering or specifics, is acceptable for a complete application. Projects may receive a conditional permit from the Corps which will become final only with submittal and approval of the final plan which must include the following elements: (1) The applicant must submit a post-construction Stormwater Management Plan which includes all requirements stated in Tier 2A & Tier 3A Projects (1)through(4)above; additionally, (2) `The Stormwater Management Plan must contain calculations for the amount of stormwater generated from new impervious surfaces resulting from site construction using one of the DEQ-accepted Stormwater Manuals (see Reference Section, attached); (3) The applicant must obtain an NPDES 1200-C or 1200-CA pernut from DEQ or it's designated agent, if soil disturbance occurs over one acre or more during construction activities (including but not limited to clearing, grading, stockpiling, filling, earthwork, excavation, development,building, demolition, and other ground disturbing or denuding activities). See new application guidance for the NPDES General Storm Water Discharge Permits, 1200-CA for municipalities and 1200-C for others at: http://www,deq.state.or.us/wq/wqpermidStormWaterFeesTable.htm (4) The NPDES 1200-C or 1200-CA permit must be retained on-site during construction, and the applicant must follow all requirements in the permit. Reference Links L`EQ Guidance Dccnr.:ent for Preparation of t::e:ti'PDES Starm�'ater Pollution Con�-ol Plan 2004 http://w�v�.v.��q.state.or.us/nwr/S�VPCP Guidance 2004.pdf DEQ Best Management Practices for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities 2001 http://www.deq.state.or.us/n«n;�Industrial%20BMPs_pdf DEQ Guidance Document for Preparation of the NPDES Storm Water Pollution Control Plan 1997 http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/wqpermit/S WGuidance.pdf DEQ Recommended Best Management Practices for Stormwater Discharge 1997 http://www.deq.state.ar.us/wq/wqpermitJStormWaterBMPs.pdf DEQ Stormwater Management Guidelines -Underground Injection Control (UIC)Program 1998 http://www.de a.state.or.us/wq/groundwa/swmg_mtgui de.htm DEQ Erosion and Sediment Control Manual 2005 (during construction) http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/wqpermiUESCManual.htm DEQ Biofilters: Guidance on Bioswales, Filter Strips, and Constructed Wetlands 2003 http://www.dep.state.or.us/nwrBiofilters.pdf * Eastern Washington Manual Chapter 5 http://www.ecy.wa.�/pubs/0410076.pdf * City of Portland Manual Chapter 2 hrip://www.portlandonline.com/bes/index.cfm?c=35122 * Western Washington Manual Volume 5 http://www.ecy.wa.�pubs/9915.pdf * Clean Water Services Manual Appendix B &E ftp://ftp.cleanwaterservices.or�/Web/ConstructionStandards/0409%20D&C%20 Stds%20Manual �df * King County Surface Water Design Manual http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/manual.htm Low Impact Develonment: Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound 2005 http://www.psat.wa.gov/Publications/LID tech manua105/lid index.htm Guidelines and Resources for Implementing Soil Depth&Quality BMP T.5.13 WDOE Western Washington Stormwater Manua12002 http•//compostwashington or�/PDF/SOIL MANUAL pdf EPA Fact Sheets http://www.epa.�ov/owm/mtb/mtbfact.htm EPA Urban Stormwater Best Management Practices Study Report http://www.epa.QOV/tivaterscience,�stcrmwater,�usw cpdf Stormwater l�lanager's Resource Center�lanual -Design Examples http://www.stormw�atercenter.net/ * DEQ accepted post-construction stormwater management manuals 3. Stormwater Conditions during authorized activities- The following conditions apply to all applicable projects authorized by the RGP.• a. The applicant must provide and implement a post-construction stormwater management plan consistent with the tiering strategy contained in Activity Specific Condition#2; and, b. All impacts to wetlands must be mitigated, including those impacts resulting from implementing a BMP, consistent with OAR 141-085-0176. 4. Stream and Wetland Restoration- a. Ineligibility-Any project employing artificial grade controls or water regulation devices such as concrete structures, dams, stop logs, full spanning weirs, or similar devices intended to alter natural hydrology is not certified by this 401 WQC. b. Heavy equipment working in wetlands must be placed on mats,or other measures shall be taken to minimize disturbance to fragile wetland soils and habitat. c. Every effort must be made to conduct channel construction,restoration,and stabilization activities in the"dry", e.g.berms which isolate the area from flow-through must be left in place on both the upstream and downstream ends during earth moving and construction activities. All disturbed areas of the bed and banks of channel restoration projects should be stabilized with biodegradable geotextile material before re-watering the project. When the stream is delivered to the newly constructed section,the breaching sequence is downstream breach first, then upstream to help minimize erosion of disturbed soils. 5. Utility Lines- a. This WQC does not authorize the construction of substations or permanent access roads for utility lines in waters of the state including wetlands. b. All stream crossings must be made perpendicular to the bankline, or nearly so, and at the narrowest, or least sensitive,portion of the wetland or riparian corridor. c. Directionally bored stream crossings: i. Drilling Discharge-All drilling equipment, drill recovery and recycling pits, and any waste or spoil produced,will be completely isolated,recovered, then recycled or disposed of to prevent entry into waters of the state. Recycling using a tank instead of drill recovery/recycling pits, is preferable; ii. In the event that drilling fluids unavoidably enter a water of the state,the equipment operator must stop work, immediately initiate containment measures and report the spill to the Oregon Emergency Response System at 800.452.0311. Prior to cleanup, plans must be submitted and approved by the regulatory agencies; iii. When drilling is completed, attempts will be made to remove the remaining drilling fluid from the sleeve (e.g.,by pumping) to reduce turbidity when the sleeve is removed; and, iv. An adequate supply of materials needed to control erosion and/or to contain drilling fluids must be maintained at the project construction site. d. Utility lines through wetlands must first be fitted with trench plugs to avoid dewatering wetlands. e. See Part A- General Condition 10 regardina site restoration. 6. Piling Placement and Removal: Avoid adverse effects to aquatic habitats during placement or removal of temporary or permanent piling. a. Immediately place removed piling onto an appropriate dry storage site. b. Attempt to remove the entire temporary or permanent piling. c. If chemically treated wood piles are to be removed using a vibratory hammer, ensure that holes are capped as the pile is removed in order to contain any undecomposed chemicals which have pooled beneath the substrate and may tend to escape upon extraction of the pile due to being less dense than the surrounding water. d. Ensure any treated wood piling to remain submerged is broken, cut, or pushed at least 3 feet below the sediment surface. e. Fill and cover holes left by each treated timber piling removed with clean,native substrates that match surrounding streambed materials. 7. Site Preparation-In addition to Stormwater Management,Part b above,the following conditions also apply: a. Project applications must be complete and account for total impacts at build-out regardless of construction phasirig. Projects may not be phased to avoid exceeding threshold limitations of 0.5 acres of wetland impact or 1000 cubic yards of material removal or fill; b. Projects are ineligible for authorization under the RGP if individual lot impacts within full developments are not accounted for; and, c. Impacts to wetlands and waters of the state for a project are additive relative to the thresholds for eligibility. 8. Water Control Structures- See General Conditions. If the applicant is dissatisfied with the conditions contained in this certification,you may request a hearing before the Environmental Quality Commission. Such request must be made in writing to the Director of DEQ within 20 days of the mailing of this certification. `, r,�_. PORTLAND SfiATTLE P B S �A��aU:tR EUGENc BENO TRI-CITtES �IENIORANDU'_VI DATE: August 23, 2006 TO: Julie Wirth Clean Water Services 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Hillsboro, OR 97123 FROM: Tom Archer-PBS Engineering&Environmental PROJECT NO: 70477.002 RE: Gerber Legendary Blades- 14200 SW 72nd Avenue,Tigard Revisions to Application Submittal Per our discussion, we've prepared additional information intended to clarify the scope of work and unpacts for this project. The following narrative describes the proposed activities as they relate to the vegetated corridor. We have also revised Figure 3 to show the required information Project Phasin�— This phase of work includes only those areas that aze immediately threatened by active erosion of the stream bank. Phase II will be undertaken next year and will involve larger areas of the stream bank (refer to Figure 3). That phase of work will be permitted separately. Imnacts to Vegetated Corridor (Buffer Areas — As indicated in Figure 3, the actual vegetated corridor widths are limited in many areas due to the presence of asphalt paving. In some areas, the paving extends to the Ordinary High Water mazk, resulting in no vegetated corridor area. In all cases, the edge of asphalt marks the edge of the vegetated corridor, as it is less than 50 feet from the edge of the resource. No permanent impacts to the vegetated comdor are anticipated. o Area 1 —There is a very small area of vegetated corridor (approximately 10 square feet between the OHW line and edge of asphalt), which will be impacted during stabilization measures. The impacts will be temporary. o Area 2 — No vegetated comdor azeas will be impacted during stabilization measures because all work will occur below the OHW line and equipment will work from the existing asphalt parking lot. o Weir Removal—A small area of the vegetated corridor (approx. 67 square feet between 131fl Main Street Vanwuver,WA 98660 360.69Q.4331 tiuw 360_69B.9064 Fwc 888.8T3.7273 nx�pREE --------------..--..._..--- -- — ENGtNEERItJ�i AND ENYIRONMENTAL www.pbsenv.com En c,�� VEGETATION SPECIAL CONDITIONS Vegetation 1. Coverage of planted woody species or naturally recruited, native woody species shall be at least 60%by the fifth year following construction in scrub-shrub and forested portions of the planting area. 2. Coverage by native emergent species shall be at least 80% by the fifth year following the mitigation construction in herbaceous portions of tne p:anting area. 3. Vegetative monitoring will be conducted using line-intercept, quadrat, or other appropriate methodology, depending on site conditions. The permittee shall specify the methodology used during the site inspection. The same methodology shall be used throughout the monitoring period. 4. All sampling locations shall be clearly identified on 8.5 by 11-inch drawings and included in the annual monitoring report. 5. Non-native, invasive species shall not exceed 15% coverage at any time during the monitoring period. 6. The permittee shall establish a minimum of three, fixed photo documentation locations to provide a visual record of structural changes during the monitoring period. Each photo documentation location shall be clearly identified on 8.5 by 11-inch drawings and submitted in each annual monitoring report. Monitoring 7. An as-built report of the planting area shall be submitted to the Corps within 60 days of completion of grading and planting. This report shall include an as-built survey of the impact site and planting area and photographs taken before and after grading of the sites, planting, or other substantial activities. 8. Monitoring shall begin immediately after the planting and continue for a period of 5 years. The monitoring period may be extended if success criteria are not achieved. 9. Monitoring shall take place between April—June of each year. 10. An annual monitoring report that summarizes the above documentation shall be submitted to the Corps by December 31 of each monitoring year. This monitoring report will document the vegetation and the hydrology of the creek and planting area. The monitoring report will include, but not be limited to: a. Permit number and Name of permittee; b. Project name and location; c. Vegetation monitoring data(i.e. plant counts); d. Photo documentation of mitigation site; e. Locations of sample collection point or transects; f. Visual observations of the mitigation site, including observations on invasive/noxious plant growth within the planting area; and g. Description of all activities that have occurred on the project site during the previous monitoring year. 11. The monitoring report will also include an analysis of the planting area and a determination as to whether the site is achieving success criteria. �n� � 12. Annual monitoring reports shall be submitted to: U.S. Anny Coips of Engineers Regulatory Branch (CEN'VVP-OD-G) Compliance & Enforcement (Washington County— Corps ID No. 200600476) P.O. Box 2946 Portland, Oregon 97208 Contingencies 13. In the event that the above success criteria are not met during the monitoring period, the permittee shall submit a contingency plan to the Corps. The contingency plan shall be approved by the Corps prior to implementation. Compliance Certification Project County: Washin�ton Permit Number: 200600476 Date of Issuance: Name of Permittee: I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit, has been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit, and that required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions, except as described below. Signature of Permittee Enc18 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland District (CENWP-OP-G) P. O. Box 2946 Portland, OR 97208-2946 i��EIV�'� ,, File Number � 2 8 20:: � CleanWater Services ' 06-002395 Our commitment is clear. �� T�f.�.- Clean Water Seroices Service Provider Letter Jurisdiction Washington County Date August 23, 2006 Map 8�Tax Lot 2S112AA-00300 Owner Site Address 14200 SW 72nd Av Applicant GERBER LEGENDARY BLADES Tigard, OR 97224-8010 Address 14200 SW 72nd Av Portland, OR 97223 Proposed Activiry Streambank Stabilization . Phone (503) 403-1251 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R8�0 04-9). YES NO � � YES NO � �Natura�l Resources I Alternatives Analysis t �� A' ssessment{NRA) X Required I X , Submitted � � (Section 3.02.6) j � � _��_.__._..___. _ _ ___�.... � District Site V9sit ❑ a Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis ❑ � � Date: ;---- ----____-__---- ------ --�-_�—.._._ -------�I- --�--.^. j Concur with NRA/or a I ❑ Tier 2 Altematives Analysis f ❑ � � � submitted information �------- -- - -- - --- - � Sensitive Area Present � On-Site � � Tier 3 Alternatives Analysis ❑ � � j-..-- -- _._..--- --�.__ ,_-- ---- -- — -�-----� ; Sensitive Area Present � � Vegetated Corridor � �� Of�Site _-------.T� ._.��_._� Averagrrtg .---------__...- �--___�� --a Vegetated Corridor � �Vegetated Corridor I � Present On-Site � � ! Mitigation Required � + � �..------- — -- -- -- �- - �----- � -� ; Width of Vegetated I I ; Corridor(feet) Va�iable 0 to 25 feet i On-Site Mitigation � � �_.�_---_. _.._....------- --- ----___..._._.__�. � Condition of Vegetated � raded Off-Site Mitigation ; Corridor � � � ------_----___----_.j___._____._ ___.--------- Enhancement Required X Restoration Planting Plan X , � �❑.V.^ Attached��J � ^` �. . _..T...._-------------__�L^� �_....------.__.�_.__...-----�_....__.i..—__....____ _ �.....—. Restore areas following ! Encroachment into j �T ' EnhancemenUrestoration j constructio�completlon. � Vegetated Corridor D ❑ I � Enhancement to occur j ' (Section 3.02.4) � completion date �within Phase II of the ; I J-�--•----- Project(Summer 2007). �Type and Square Footage ! i Geotechnical Report � ❑ � a of Encroachment � Temporery,7T sf � required � �-----------.__.....,_ _...h-__- ---. X �-.._.__�..-------.�...._._................_..._ _—.X.___. _ _...._._ � Allowed Use —T� ' � (Section 3.02.4) I � � Conditions Attached ❑ ❑ �.__...-------,..._..�_......_.....__..._..—•--_..,I..---.�_.�_---'------...y----.—..--•------__..__...-- ------ ---..�____ This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect wafisr quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. Page 1 of 5 � File Number 06-002395 In order to comply with Clean Water Services (the District)water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the foHowing conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.3. 2. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the vegetated corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.4. 3. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the vegetated corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the vegetated corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by Section 3.02.5 and per approved plans. 4. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provlde the District or its designee(appropriate city)with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. 5. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. 6. Appropriate Best Management Practices {BMP's) for Erosion Control, in accordance with the CWS Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used priar to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 7. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the District or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.6. 8. The District or City/County may require an easement over the vegetated corridor conveying storm, surface water management, and/or sanitary sewer rights to the District or City that would prevent the owner of the vegetated corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. 9. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with Section 3.13 of R&O 04-9. 10. Removal of native,woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable. 11. Removal of invasive non-native species by hand is required in all vegetated corridors rated "good". Replanting is required in any cleared areas larger than 25 square feet. 12. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by the District, the appficant shaff provide updated drawings, and if necessary,obtain a revised Service Provider Lefter. 13. For vegetated corridors less than 50 feet wide, the entire vegetated corridor shall be equal to or better than a"good"corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.7, Table 3.2. Enhancement of the entlre Veuetated Corrldor shall occur within Phase II of the arotect(Summer 2007). Page 2 of 5 • File Number. 06-002395 SPECIAL CONQITIONS 14. Clean Water Services sha11 be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of enhancement/restoration activities. EnhancemenUrestoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements{R&0 04-9:Appendix D). 15. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the vegetated corridor shall be removed. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native trees and shrub species. 16. Restoration of the temporarily impacted vegetated corridar areas shall be provided in accordance with the attached replanting schedule and R80 04-9,Appendix D. 17. The applicant shall provide the District with the required vegetated corridor enhancement plan during Phase II of the project in compliance with R80 04-9. � 18. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with Section 2.11.2 of R&O 04-9. If at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80°� survival level, the Owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the iwo year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. 19. Performance assurances for the vegetated corridor shall comply with Section 2.06.2, Table 2-1 and Section 2.10, Table 2-2. This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-aaproved site qlan is attached. Please call (503)681-3613 with any questions. Julle Wirth Environmental Plan Review Attachments( 3 ) , Page 3 of 5 I J y � � I � IY�'L'`"�"t' Y'� r�{� {�.Vt x i Z �� 1 I � ��",'ea�5 �`:ar �y��^��'.� � � � 8 �e� � � . � 3 _ � : � � ; �; ,, , 4 m � ,, . K � ";��`�� •�rx 'rn � ?X '.� tv�+7� � y� � � � 1 �y�.�..bF��I.Y *":. t . . .. . . f�i� � 'r �L _ .. .�. . t ':!� � � F',�.�, � % .:, s� '- "�� . � ��, � � i i r a�"c` r R � ir��'.;'1�^.:M��e + . . :4f��'_Xyp��,. .� F 1, ��9R'�. '�xi�� + . I t :'r ry , .5 ti . ' y M i `�a. ! �. � ��y��,.kr�,,�� . " . ;�' '� � , �S �C:"`h��x r'.�,�1 Z ' ��s+a:A.�.+i. � 'r . . ,�,_ - N ' , � :/�. ",� . �� .�" �'jr�t";'� '�� ° +'i�. �0" �$'� �� N �� ° ' � ��pproved, s' . �� , �� ,,�� ; � �',�Cfe�Water 5erviCEs � • � ' _ , a � ,c��`�, �:. , t v' `e"'�l �1 or:i R-c+u� f :" w. •,: ` ; �� Y:,�� N � � '� � , �a�.;i��_ ,��o� �_ � , �- `�' �i - �' ��'� �� t . �- , � 1 - W , ��. i Z 3 � ', o ,; � �` � � ��-�� f:~h � : � * � � � , � , N g ,� : ,�;` , d''�°� �� , �:t o � �. , 2R d �� tY. t ��1yR. . . . y . �A I -�i. +�`t .. � � ' 1 . � �h,-'Y�; � �` A ;f, �� . M - � . .,,Y. . r. :��'?' .�- - �,c a' ... _ _ ,��y� �Y..+�'�, i � � ,�:S;r �2 � r�,� .� , . y�. ;'�� . . '' �n ; ��•. �nf _:#f°. � . N �'��t-r�''..?�,M ,,{ - '� �� r' � � �i �! 5� �4.'. �♦ ,w�� y,+ = r++� a_ ; , r+. i � `��f;g .x� ~ � yy' - ��-'~.F: i � `7 ." � ��,�� jttli^ W � p+W��'��1 � Rp �i��t�`+'>,�+:_�?��-_S.: S� �� . tl1 ; $ _ . ,.::� - � m � N � �I r p i � � @ ... � c +4.t.: W V pZp Z � H A m cn �, m ° �a m _ � �; � P`a�1°� WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREA AND VEGETATED C�RRIDOR MAP FIGURE , � 70477.002 Gerber Legendary Blades � o�� 142U0 SW 72nd Avenue , � �uiy 2oos TIGARD,OREGON s �.� �uo- O�-m�3�s Cban Waler Servic�$ — — - � Endwwv�en}a1 �lati�.n.q 8-aa-o� �/_ �� - 2 3 ___ P B S m��.E _ __, .M ��., , � —"'__ — � ' STMlf1[i 'T i W�c, I —.l--r`--——� ��AM�AM�.—C1. _ 1 ' .�.e I EN(31Nff11RqNDENNRONMENT/�L .. _ , — 1 1 ,pAY'AGI 1r � �a�arw�a��c� I MFA �^: �' v�nCaNERw�er�rcmn eeeeo ' I N1VE:I�IaYDan1 A� I fAKlflqMM�f " � ' � RKAAFAI �:�:�..' i MpiMw�.D��'mn ' '` - i BEM01MAR1f • I � � � . � � I '}��l�� I -IIET�AND .'._ �Nd2K AREAS � � <�M I I �-�A•-CROSS SECTION LOCA710N . ,�. � �rt1� I .. """ a ORdNAR1'HIQI MIAIE7KINE � ' :,lk��.' � '_..__- EIYSTMG CONT.OURS _ � � . ' � ............ AREA 2 � � � - ., . BUFFER IYPACT AREAS �Ars.0 1: 1 Oyf� �C�� +s�c�\ ��ii,� B, � - � v �� ,1^';, I a - urnc��reo wam�n�s- , ,,; � a PHhSE� 1 '�'�1jI � W a � �e w.�t� C �1 i �� '' i p N6G.' Fxts�Cy '(arr� 1.•1 a y.^ Ma T�DJJ i, �,' j � W �l O � �1�r'fa.• Q��ulr.2d Pan�nLN(R..r��en� '1U �Ye '�70✓to'w�ed t�... �'O✓t\JM1�f1�-� I �'��e'� � � � C� .. W�',\^�1"Se. �y � c�L�wlvNC�/ 1 .`Z-00� , .i::y,� � � � � [� - � '} ��, i w w � 0 _ . .. __ ;�!;;I � �' � � �I ' �� ; ; � � � � �� S � �, �=' � . MIPAC7 �T � l ! i WPy " � � _ _ � ... CG �' .., ._ _'.... � -\ � I ��. . �. ..._ . ... _ �-TlIUY AREA riON(AnEA .� . � � . � ��. I � � T�__ __��sL____ .�--s,�. . � . .. J 7 � � _. �� . � � � � A _ - � � f�� •• . - � - . � ... _ .. � - �f'. �. ' [ � C'1°_ � � � _ ti�,. T`s.�-„�r._,�.� - . __ ..r_,� �,}�'+�./ `��#�'allf63a�Pff_ ,_,{«,w�X',4 - __ .. �_� - l••-4t� �� , � � � �' 't.�'° —_ �' '�c - _ . __�_"-"'�.r �°° `- �=��t�_�_-`�=�J i`• �� I �"'� . �1 I � - �� y� - _._.a=--=-� EXISTING CONCRtfF Nti(fr .,: '+_� � � � '1�",,F�.—.,+� ._ _ •�. ."".1 i � �I VYETLANO AREA=51 W SF `�/ i � l ��'�.��._��____��______J L-----------------------------------------------------------------�--------- NOTE.9: � , 1.SUflVEV PROVIOED BY STATEWIOE LAND Sl1RVEVING.INC. ematM� tIGUR� � 2.YYE7LMlD BOUNOMY SURVEYED BY 3TATEWIDE lMb 3URVEYING,INC.SUPPLEMENTAL PdNT LOCA710N �an.00x Cd1ECTEp BY PBS USINO TRIMBIF GEOXT GPS UNR WITH 3l1BMETER P0.4T PqOCESSING ACCURACY. A e�e E I srw�:r.w II AUG.20D6 I v I 3.3EE FIOURE 4 FOR CR033 SECTIONS AND PfiOP05F.D CONTOURS. . . _ � ' ido� 1� l a�� e�c'`"t�.. ' �le ka C� �' �' S OHW line and edge of asphalt) will be impacted in order to access the work azea to remove the weir. The impacts will be temporary and the azea will be re-graded to match the existing contours and replanted. �.nnancement �vieasures — hii vegetaiea corriaor areas uiat aze unpaciea auring mese acuvines will be enhanced by sowing a native seed mix and planting native trees and shrubs in the disturbed areas. The native seed mix will consist of tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa), California brome (Bromus carinatus), blue wildrye (Elymus glaucus), large-leaved avens (Geum macrophyllum),and two-colored lupine(Lupinus bicolor). Work Area 1: Native seed mix seeded at 1 pound per 500 square feet. • Shrubs:6 red-osier dogwood(Cornus sericea)(24-inch live cuttings). Work Area 2: Native seed mix seeded at 1 pound per 500 square feet. , Trees:3 Oregon white oak(Quercus garryana),and 2 buckthom cascara(Rhamnus purshiana). Shrubs: 30 tall Oregon grape(Mahonia aquifolium),25 red-osier dogwood(Cornus sericea)(24- inch live cuttings),25 Douglas' spirea(Spiraea douglasi��. We understand that enhancement of the entire vegetated corridor on the development side of the resource may be required as a condition of this permit. Due to the phasing of this project, 'enhancement is only proposed in those azeas that are being impaeted as pact of this phase of work. The applicant will propose enhancement measures for the entire development side of the vegetated corridor as part of Phase II,which is anticipated in the summer of 2007. If you have any questions concerning this application or require additional information,please contact me at 360-213-0443. `n� -�a. �o r a -�a3�� TOVBt� �1e� at�Sernces ��ro"vn� � �10� 1�.e.�� By Qate S-��_t�, s� ��„�� 3� 3 { i � �3t0 Main 3lreet � Vancower,WA 98660 380.690..9337 sux� 360.696.9084 c�x ' 888.873.T2'/3 n�uFnEe I ENGINEERING ANO ENVlRONMENTAI ! www.pbssnv.com � I 1 �