Loading...
CPA2009-00002 CPA2009 00002 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR PARKING STANDARDS r ! eft °' z aHIBIT , 120 DAYS =N/A DATE MAILED: 6/29/2009 gi CITY OF TIGARD ' �= " '- Washington County, Oregon --_ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCIL Case Numbers: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2009-00002 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT(DCA) 2009-00002 Case Name: DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS Applicant's Name/Address: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 Owner's Names/Addresses: N/A Address of Property: The Downtown Urban Renewal District. Tax Map/Lot Nos.: N/A A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND A DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (ORDINANCE NO. 09-09). THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL HAVE REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION FIELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON MAY 18, 2009 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE REQUEST. THE CITY COUNCIL ALSO HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON UNE 23, 2009 PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION ON THE REQUEST. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER Subject: > A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 8.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8-10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130 — Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking on SW Main and SW Burnham Streets and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. AT THE 6/23/09 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING, THE CO UNCIL UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THIS REQUEST(Ordinance No. 2009-09). ZONES: CBD: Central Business District and MUR 1: Mixed-Use High-Density Residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.2(c) and Goal 15;and Statewide Planning Goals 1,and 12. Action: > ® Approval as Requested ❑ Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper,posted at City Hall and mailed to: ® Affected Government Agencies ® Interested Parties Final Decision: THIS IS THE FINAL DECISION BY THE CITY AND IS EFFECTIVE ON JULY 23,2009. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon. Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) within 21 days according to their procedures. Questions: Call the City of Tigard Plannine Division or the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. QTY OF TIGARD,OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.09-09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOAL 12 - TRANSPORTATION, TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN CHAPTER 8, (CPA2009-00002), COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (DCA2009-00002) CHAPTER 18.810 — STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS, AND THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 10, TO ALLOW VEHICLE, PARKING AND REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE BIKE LANES ON COT:LECTOR STREETS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Section 18.380.020 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code requires legislative amendments to be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060;and WHEREAS,notice was provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development 45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing;and WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18, 2009, and recommended approval of the proposed amendment with a 7-0 vote;and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearings was published in the Tigard Times Newspaper at least 10 business days prior to the public hearings;and . WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds that parking should be allowed and separate bike lanes should not always be required along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has considered applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; any applicable Metro regulations; any applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies; and any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances;and WHEREAS,the City Council has found the following to be the applicable review criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) and Goal 15; and Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 12;and WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council held a public heating on June 23, 2009 to consider the proposed amendments;and WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council has determined that the proposed development code amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria, and that approving the request would be in the best interest of the City of Tigard. ORDINANCE No.09- ( Page 1 NOW,THEREFORE,THE QTY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECI1ON 1: The attached findings (Exhibit A) are hereby adopted in explanation of the Council's decision. SEC11ON 2: The specific text amendments attached (Exhibit B) to this Ordinance are hereby adopted and approved by the City Council. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor,and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By (A n a n I fl 1 O AS vote of all Co cif members present after being read by number and tide only,this, ay ,2009. 1I./� Brine Wheatley,City corder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this 3 day of ,2009. l4 Craig Dirksen, .yor Ap•roved as to form: ++ � ./1� City Attorney Date G ORDINANCE No.09- 09 Page 2 • EXHIBIT A Agenda Item: 5.2 Hearing Date: May 18.2009 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON �T t G`ltl SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE NAME: DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS AMENDMENT CASE NOS.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) CPA2009-00002 Development Code Amendment(DCA) DCA2009-00002 PROPOSAL: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 12.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8- 10), 'Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the Municippal Code (10.28.130 —Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW-Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 ZONES: CBD: Central Business District The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outtring�ht. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment,utilities, facilities with drive-up windows,medical centers,major event entertainment and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. MUR: Mixed Use Residential Districts. The MUR zoning district is designed to apply to predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted when compatible with the residential use. A high density (MUR-1) and moderate density (MUR-2) designation is available within the MUR zoning district. C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single- family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use.A wide range of uses,including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment,and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. Within the Tigard Triangle and Bull Mountain Road District, residential uses at a minimum density of MIT REPORT TO TI II:PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-0(X)02 PAGI:]017 C DOWNTOWN COI JA',,C1'OR til1tlil:f STANDARDS • conjunction with a commercial development. Heliports, medical centers, religious institutions and utilities are permitted conditionally.Deveo ments in the GP zoning district are intended to serve as a buffer between residential areas and more-intensive commercial and industrial areas. LOCATION: Downtown Urban Renewal District. APPLICABLE RE VIE W CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) and Goal 15;and Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 12. SECTION IL STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find in favor to amend the Tigard Development Code 18.810, Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2, Transportation System Plan Chapter 8 and Municipal Code Title 10 as proposed with any alterations as determined through the public hearing process and make a final recommendation to the Tigard City Council. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The proposal is to amend the street standards for collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. There are four collectors within the downtown(Main,Burnham and Scoffins Streets and Ash Avenue - Exhibit A. The current standard for collector streets does not permit on-street parking and requires bicycle lanes on all collector streets within the city. The proposed amendments will allow on-street parking along collectors within the downtown. In addition, the construction of designated bicycle lanes may not be required for all collectors within the downtown. The requirement for separate bile lanes would be determined by the City Engineer. This proposal allows flexibility in downtown street design until permanent standards can be adopted and allows on-street parking,which already exists along Main Street. PROPOSED CHANGES The proposed changes are as follows (Exhibit B): 1. Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards • Table 18.810.1,Figure 18.810.2.,and ; • Section 18.810.110 - These changes will allow vehicle parking along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District and allow bike lane requirements to be determined by the City Engineer for the same downtown collectors. 2. Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) - remove the requirement to construct bike lanes in accordance with the Bicycle Master Plan along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. 3. Transportation System Plan Chapter 8 Motor Vehicles, Figure 8-10 (Arterial and Collector Sample Street Cross Sections) - the criteria within the chart regarding On Street Parking is being modified to allow exceptions. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 2 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS 4. Tigard Municipal Code 10.28.130 - Remove the parking restriction for the north side of Burnham Street near the intersection with Hall Boulevard (Restriction #65). This is necessary because Burnham Street has been designed to allow parking in this area. All other Municipal Code parking restrictions on downtown collectors found in the Municipal Code will remain in effect. • SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA Chapter 18.380 states that legislative text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060G. Chapter 18.390.060G states that the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors: 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; Forty-five day advance notice was provided to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) on April 2, 2009, more than 45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing as required. In addition, the Tigard Development Code (TCD) and Comprehensive Plan have been acknowledged by DLCD. The following are the applicable Statewide Planning Goals that are applicable to this proposal: 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; Statewide Planning Goal 1- Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and for changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. This goal has been met by complying with the Tigard Development Code notice requirements set forth in Chapter 18.390. Notice has been published in the Tigard Times Newspaper prior to the public hearing. In addition a notice was posted on the City website. Statewide Planning Goal 12 -Transportation This goal outlines provisions to insure a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. Transportation plans must consider all modes of transportation, meet local, regional, and state transportation needs and plan requirements, conserve energy, and facilitate the flow of goods and services. The proposed amendment will affect bicycle users by accommodating bicycle traffic in designated lanes or wider vehicle travel lanes. 3. Any applicable METRO regulations; There are no applicable Metro regulations under the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. The 2004 Regional Transportation Plan addresses street design from a region-wide perspective. The collector streets affected by this amendment are not considered regionally significant;therefore,the regional street design standards do not apply. 4. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING ODMIvIISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 3 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT Goal 1.1 Provide citizens, affected agencies and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2 The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. Goal 1.2 Ensure all citizens have access to: A. opportunities to communicate directly to the City; and B. information on issues in an understandable form. Policy 1. The City shall ensure pertinent information is readily accessible to the community and presented in such a manner that even technical information is easy to understand. Policy 2. The City shall utilize such communication methods as mailings, posters, newsletters, the internet, and any other available media to promote citizen involvement and continue to evaluate the effectiveness of methods used. Policy 6. The City shall provide opportunities for citizens to communicate to Council, boards and commissions, and staff regarding issues that concern them. The City has published notice of the hearing and posted the site pursuant to TDC 18.390.050 for Type IV Procedures. In addition, a copy of the hearing notice was posted on the City website. Public hearings will be held before the Planning Commission and City Council. With these public involvement provisions this application is consistent with applicable Citizen Involvement policies. TRANSPORTATION Goal 12.1 Transportation System Policy 2 (A) Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of transportation (including motor vehicle, bicycle,pedestrian,transit and other modes) by: The development of and implementation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility,pedestrian,bicycle,transit,truck and auto use. The proposed collector street standards will still accommodate multiple modes of traffic. Sidewalks are provided for pedestrians. Bicycles lanes or wider vehicle travel lanes are required to accommodate bicyclists. Policy 2 (C) Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master. All schools, parks, public facilities, and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. The policy requires bike lanes on all collectors consistent with the bicycle master plan. The Bicycle Master Plan (Figure 6-2) shows proposed bike lanes on Burnham Street, Scoffins Street, and Ash Avenue. Lanes are not shown on Main Street. As proposed, the amendment will allow streets to be designed with or without designated bike lanes within the downtown. Bicycles will still be accommodated by wider vehicle travel lanes STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009.00002 PAGE 4 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS 'where bike lanes were not provided (e.g. Burnham Street). In addition, some off-street bicycle circulation is currently provided by the Fanno Creek Trail that runs parallel to Burnham Street. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS-- DOWNTOWN Goal 15.4 Develop comprehensive street and circulation improvements for pedestrians, automobiles, bicycles, and transit. Policy 1. The downtown shall be served by a complete array of multi-modal transportation services including auto,transit,bike, and pedestrian facilities. As proposed,the collector street standards will serve multiple modes of travel including autos,transit,bike,and pedestrians. The City is currently working on a circulation plan for the downtown that will improve connectivity and establish street standards for the downtown. In addition, the City is also undertaking a comprehensive review of the Transportation System Plan (TSP). The proposed amendments will allow flexible street standards for the downtown until more appropriate standards can be established. 5. Any applicable provision of the City's implementing ordinances. Code Section 18.380 Zoning Map and Text Amendments: This section regulates amendments. It outlines the process for reviewing Development Code Text Amendments. The present amendment will be reviewed under the Type TV legislative procedure as set forth in the chapter. This procedure requires public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Code Section 18.390 Decision-Making Procedures: This chapter establishes standard decision-making procedures for reviewing applications. The amendment under consideration will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as detailed in the chapter. Code Section 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards: This section of the code provides standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The amendment modifies the collector standards to allow on-street parking in the downtown, but also eliminates the requirement for designated bicycle lanes. The removal of this requirement does not mean that bike lanes will not be provided, but provides options and flexibility for downtown street design. SECTION V. STAFF ANALYSIS The current Comprehensive Plan (Transportaion Chapter), TSP, and Development Code street standards address collectors on a city-wide basis. Little consideration was given on how collectors might function in different areas of the city. In this case, downtown collectors serve not only as connectors between arterials such as Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard;they also transport users to a destination—Downtown Tigard. In addition to conveying traffic through the area and connecting to regional public transit available at the Tigard Transit Center, downtown collectors should also accommodate those wishing to spend time within the downtown by providing public parking options on the streets. On-street parking will be essential as the downtown redevelops to its intended dense form. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 5 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS Collector streets typically do not allow on-street parking due to the larger traffic volumes carried by collectors and the higher rates of speed which are permitted. In the downtown, the speeds will likely be lower than on a typical collector street and on-street parking also acts as a traffic calming device causing drivers to travel at lower speeds. Downtown streets are also likely to be designed differently and therefore, will function differently from other collectors within the city. The City is currently within Periodic Review and will be updating the TSP and Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition,a circulation plan is also being prepared for the downtown. As noted above this plan will improve connectivity and establish street standards for the downtown. The amendments being proposed with this application could be further altered, eliminated or replaced in the future. Until those plans are finalized, the proposed changes will allow some flexibility in the design of collectors within the downtown and accommodate existing on-street parking along Main Street. SECTION VI. OTHER ALTERNATIVES No Action - The code would remain unchanged. Parking will not be permitted on any collector in the City. Designated bicycle lanes will be required on all collector streets throughout the City. Alternate Actions - Apply the amendment to specific downtown collector streets. The public already parks along portions of Main Street, Burnham Street and Ash Avenue. Burnham Street has been redesigned to accommodate on-street parking. SECTION VII. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF &OUTSIDE AGENCY COMJVIENTS The City of Tigard Police Department,Engineering Division, Public Works Department, Long Range Planning Division, and the Current Planning Code Enforcement Officer were given copies of the proposed code amendment. Only Code Enforcement and Police responded with no objections. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, Clean Water Services (CWS), Metro, ODOT Rail, and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD) were notified of the proposed amendment. No written comments were received from most agencies. CWS responded with no concerns or objections to the proposed amendments, but did note that any improvements to upgrade streets to the new designations would require Storm Water Connection Permit approval. May 11,2009 • PREPA REt)BY: Cheryl Caules DATE Associate Planner � j Aii-t May 1] 2009 APPROVEDY: Dick Beavers orl` DATE Planning Manager STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009.00002 PAGE 6 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS I EXHIBIT A —tev_vm—li. i • I _ __ Downtown Tigard Collector Streets May 7, 2009 t cT City of Tigard iiikOregon ' • • -2: ''''''' -. - . ' '... ..- . . : '' • _ F1 7vr.t P y la r City Hall wingEass Collector Designation Urban Renewal District 1. -- -- Railroad .- i Park 0 250 500 1,000 1 I I t t I I I I I A Feet EXHIBIT B CPA2009-00002 & DCA2009,00002 COLLECTOR STREET.STANDARDS AMENDMENT May 11,2009 • ••. Explanation of Fotniattilik.; These text amendment employ the following foigiatting: • IBold,Underline And IttiliC1 7 Text to be added Proposed code language is as follows: Chapter 18.810 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.810.030 Streets Figure 18.8102 Collector Sample Cross Sections az (Ord.02-33) rL• ,9 4% 6-8' 5.5' :6'84 11' , 11 6.81ce4 5.5' 6-8' 2 Lane 5862'R44/ '!; 4 - ' •,r_5:6-8', 5.5' 6'fike., 11' l'ftj'm Loniaglni„ . _ 3 Lane 70'-74'R/W 1. .ie '11/1.1*Z .5' 12'Median/ 6n8:..:„5,5' 45!8tg.I. 11' 11' •Jurn.Lane.. 11' ,11' ,6'alke , 6-8' 5 Lane 92=96'R/W "'Parking is allowed on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District Bike lane requirements on these same collectors shall be determined by the City Engineer. Table 18.810.1 Minimum Widths for Street Characteristics - q ›y. Type of Street ‘41 ..0 :� c �' �` ,� , �, 4 3 � � fro. � � quo � � 3 % � get � at 8 0 ti Arterial 64'-128' Varies 2-7(Refer to 12' N/A 6' (New Streets) 8'(Res.&Ind. Zones) 5' 12°) TSP) 5'-6'(Existing Streets) 10'(Comm.Zones) r Collector 58'-96' Varies 2-5(Refer to 11' N/A 6' (New Streets)a 6' (Res.&Ind.Zones) 5' 12'(') TSP) g��*1 5'-6'(Existin: Streets ° 8' Comm.Zones) , Neighborhood Route 50'-58' 28'-36' 2 10' 8' 5'-6' 5'-6'(2) 5' N/A Local: Industrial/Commercial 50' 36' 2 N/A 5'.-6'(2) 5' N/A Local: Residential N/A • Under 1500 ADT 54'/503 32'/2843) 2 8' (both sides) N/A 5'-6'(2) 5' • Under 500 ADT 50'/4641) 28'/24'3) 2 8' (one side) N/A • Under 200 ADT 46'/42'3) 24'/20'3) 2 (No Parking) N/A Cul-de-sac bulbs in 50' 42'radius N/A N/A N/A N/A Industrial and radius Commercial zones Cul-de-sac bulbs in 47' 40'radius N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Residential zones radius Alley: Residential 16' 16' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alley: Business 20' 20' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (Ord. 02-33) 'Medians required for 5 and 7 lane roadways. They are optional for 3 lane roadways. 2 Sidewalk widths for these streets shall be S ft with landscape strip;6 ft if against curb(if permitted in accordance with 18.810.070.C). 3"Skinny Street"roadway widths are permitted where cross section and review criteria are met. Refer to corresponding cross sections(Figures 18.810.3, 18.810.4 and 18.810.5)for details and conditions. °Parking is allowed on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. 5Bicycle lane requirements on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District shall be determined by the City Engineer. • 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all Arterial and Collector routes and where identified on the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan (TSP). Bike lane requirements alon' collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District shall be determined by the City Engineer. o=o TRANSPORTATION a policy or implementation strategy specifically conflicts with the updated TSP, the specific policy or implementation strategy has been deleted. Section 1: Transportation System KEY FINDINGS O There are 22 intersections near or at capacity based on the 2001 Tigard Transportation System Plan. O There is no continuous bicycle network in Tigard. O There are significant gaps in the sidewalk system with few interconnected locations linking to schools, retail,parks, and transit. O Segments of Highway 217 and 1-5.are over capacity and ORE 99W will continue to serve more through traffic in the future. m Future traffic models indicate ORE 99W and half of the signalized traffic • intersections fail within 20 years assuming no improvements are made. O Travel time data on Highway 217 indicates that some of the slowest travel speed on the facility occurs in Tigard due to existing capacity issues and the need for interchange improvements. O In the development of the transportation system plan,seven goals were identified which were used as the guidelines for the development of the policies and implementation strategies. The goals were:livability,balanced transportation system,safety,performance,accessibility,goods movement, and coordination. GOAL: 12.1 Transportation System POLICIES: 1. Plan,design,and construct transportation facilities in a manner which enhances the livability of Tigard by: A. Proper location and design of transportation facilities. • 12-2 City of Tigard I Comprehensive Plan l �• O—O TRANSPORTATIONi- 13. Encouraging pedestrian accessibility ' M `f` ft fis` c by providing safe, secure and desirable ` f7Cljjls aging �_ pedestrian routes. ` C. Addressing issues of excessive speeding and through traffic on local ' Y,;' ��rccess1V1'tt)' residential streets through a neighbor „ _. • hood traffic program. The program O. • should address corrective measures r,` for existing problems and assure that SCd e, seem e, development incorporates traffic calming s f L nL desii able 2. Provide a balanced transportation system, P y , incorporating all modes of transportation (including motor vehicle,bicycle,pedes- trian,transit and other modes) by: A. The development of and implemen- tation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility,pedestrian,bicycle, transit, truck and auto use. B. Coordination with TriMet,and/or any other transit providers serving Tigard, to improve transit service to Tigard. Fixed route transit will primarily use arterial and collector streets in Tigard. Development adjacent to transit routes will provide direct pedestrian accessibility. C. Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicyde master plan, with the exception of collectors within the downtown urban renewal district All schools,parks,public facilities,and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. D. Construction of sidewalks on all streets within Tigard. All schools, parks,public facilities,and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a sidewalk. E. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recre- ational trails. F. Design local streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by providing connectivity and limiting out-of-direction travel and provide connectivity to activity centers and destinations with a priority for bicyde and pedestrian connections. G. Tigard will participate in vehicle trip reduction strategies developed Comprehensive Plan I City of Tigard 12-3 DKS Associates . A CITY OF TIGARD Transportation \.� System Plan 11I 5' 1 6' 16'Bike I 12' I 12' 16'B11ae 16' 5' 11� r I R/W 60' 1 2 Lane 60'R/W ,:t -...--.--- 11111k—s -m.o. •12-14'Medla�y • 15' 1 6' 16'BIke I 12-13' 1 Turn Lane�cl 12'-13' 16'BBeI 6' 1 5' 111 I R/W 74' 1 3*Lane 74'R/W .4 J � 14'MedlonL 111 5' I 6' 1 b'Bike I 12' 1 12' 1 Turn Lane 1 12' 1 12' 16'BBe I 6' 1 5' 11 j 1 R/W 98' 1 5*Lane 98'R/W lift :., 12'Median( 1 f 6' I 6' 16'Bike 1 12' I 12' 1 12' 1 Turd one 1 12' i 12' I 12' 3BI a 6'F 6' I 6 111 R/W 98' 7*Lane 122'R/W Criteria Vehicle Lane Widths: Truck Route=12 ff. (minimum widths) Bus Route= 12 ft. - 1i ft. (12 if Preferred) Collector 10-11 ft. . On Street Parking: None(with few existing exceptions) Bicycle Lanes: New Construction=6 ft. (minimum widths) Reconstruction=5 to 6 ft. Sidewalks:(minimum width) 5-13 ft. Consider Curb Extensions on Ped Routes Landscape Strips: Required Medians: . 5/7 Lane=Required 3 Lane=Optional Neighborhood Traffic Only Under Special Conditions: Management: Selected Measures . Figure 8-10 *Note that sidewalk widths above 6 R.may require additional right-of-way. ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR Where appropriate,the median/lane may not be provided resulting In 2,4 and SAMPLE STREET CROSS SECTIONS 6 lane cross sections. The removal of the center Sum lane must consider both REQUIRED 6t®1/� WIDTH safely and pedestrian needs. !/e • TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE terminus thereof; S.W. Genesis Loop, extending from the most southerly intersection thereof with S.W. 115th 49. Within the northerly half of S.W. Avenue easterly a distance of one hundred sixty- Walnut Place; also, within the southwest half of five feet; S.W. Walnut Place beginning at S.W. Pacific and, thence, extending a distance of one hundred 58. Along both sides of S.W. Durham Road seventy-five feet southeasterly along the curbline; between Hall Boulevard.and Pacific Highway; 50. Within a portion of the right-of-way of 59. Repealed by Ord. 95-32; S.W. Hampton Street being all that portion thereof lying between S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. 66th 60. Within the west half of the right-of-way Avenue; of S.W. 92nd Avenue, beginning at the intersection thereof with the south right-of-way • 51. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; line of S.W. Durham Road; thence, extending southerly one thousand four hundred fifty feet; 52. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; 61. Within the right-of-way of S.W. 92nd 53. Within the southeast half of the most Avenue, beginning at a point which lies one southerly end of S.W. Main Street, beginning at thousand four hundred fifty feet southerly of the the intersection of the southeast curblines of S.W. south right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road; Pacific Highway and S.W. Main Street and thence, extending southerly one thousand one extending seventy-five feet along the Main Street hundred ninety feet;excepting therefrom the south curbline to a point; also, therein, beginning at a six hundred eighty feet of the west half thereof; point on the Main Street curbline which lies two hundred five feet from said intersecting curblines 62. Along the east side of S.W. 85th Avenue and extending thirty feet therealong to a point; from Durham Road to a point four hundred fifty feet south of the south curbline of Durham Road; 54. Within the westerly half of the right-of- way of 115th Avenue extending from the 63. On S.W. Varns Street from S.W. 72nd intersection with S.W. Gaarde Street northerly to Avenue to a point one hundred twenty-five feet the intersection of S.W.Fonner Street; west of the west curbline of 72nd Avenue; 55. Within the northwesterly right-of-way 64. On S.W. Watkins Avenue from S.W. of S.W. McKenzie Street from a point twenty feet Pacific Highway to a point seventy-five feet west southeasterly from the intersection of the of the west curbline of Pacific Highway; centerlines at S.W. McKenzie St., and S.W. Grant St., to a point ninety feet southeasterly of the -. . - - ..- • - ,. ••._ - . . _ .. .. .. centerline intersection; . • -. - - . : -•• = •• - - . _- • •• -• - 56. On the northwesterly half of S.W. Ash --. - . :, .-••- - • - - = - - -•- . -- Avenue beginning at the northeast right-of-way lea} eet; line of S.W. Commercial Street and extending thence northeasterly one hundred thirty-eight feet. 66. On S.W. 69th Avenue from Pacific, Highway to a point one hundred fifty feet north of 57. Within the curblines on each side of the north curbline of Pacific Highway, measured 10-28-9. SE Update: 10/04 EXHIBITO3 • Patty Lunsford From: Patty Lunsford Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 11:06 AM To: 'John.Mermin @oregonmetro.gov'; 'bicyclist©comcast.net' Subject: Notice of Final Order by the City Council (CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 - Downtown Collector St. Standards Attachments: CPA2009-00002 Council Final Order.pdf Dear John Mermin and Hal Ballard: As a participant in the public hearing process for the City of Tigard's Downtown Collector Street Standards Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment application, you are entitled to notification of the City of Tigard's Final Order by the Council. Therefore, you will find an electronic copy of that Final Order attached to this email for your reference. If you would prefer a hard copy by mail, please provide me with your mailing address and I will place a copy in the mail to you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me either by email or phone. Sincerely, Patty Lunsford Planning .ctssista:nt City of Tigard/Current Planning 503.7 18.2438/patty @tigarcd-or.gov Oregon Department of Land Conservation 635 and DevelopStreeSuiment Capitol t, te 150 r .h. Salem,OR 97301-2540 r►�aoe.R Kuon�sk;Governo (503)373-0050 ®`rJ� Fax(503)378-5518 t 1-1" www.lcd.state.or.us NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT 07/08/2009 TO: Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan or Land Use Regulation Amendments FROM: Plan Amendment Program Specialist SUBJECT: City of Tigard Plan Amendment DLCD File Number 003-09 The Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD)received the attached notice of adoption. A Copy of the adopted plan amendment is available for review at the DLCD office in Salem and the local government office. Appeal Procedures* DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Monday,July 20,2009 This amendment was submitted to DLCD for review prior to adoption. Pursuant to ORS 197.830(2)(b) only persons who participated in the local government proceedings leading to adoption of the amendment are eligible to appeal this decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals(LUBA). If you wish to appeal,you must file a notice of intent to appeal with the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA)no later than 21 days from the date the decision was mailed to you by the local government. If you have questions,check with the local government to determine the appeal deadline. Copies of the notice of intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received written notice of the final decision from the local government. The notice of intent to appeal must be served and filed in the form and manner prescribed by LUBA,(OAR Chapter 661,Division 10). Please call LUBA at 503-373-1265, if you have questions about appeal procedures. *NOTE: THE APPEAL DEADLINE IS BASED UPON THE DATE THE DECISION WAS MAILED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT. A DECISION MAY HAVE BEEN MAILED TO YOU ON A DIFFERENT DATE THAT IT WAS MAILED TO DLCD. AS A RESULT, YOUR APPEAL DEADLINE MAY BE EARLIER THAN THE ABOVE DATE SPECIFIED. Cc: Cheryl Caines,City of Tigard Gloria Gardiner, DLCD Urban Planning Specialist Bill Holmstrom, DLCD Transportation Planner Meg Fernekees, DLCD Regional Representative <paa> YA • P a :q _I .1 ��:•111_ 117.�l liil P M DLCD ► DEPT OF Notice of Adoption JON: 3'0 2009 THIS FORM MUST BE MAILED TODLCD LAND CONSERVATION WITHIN 5'WORKING.DAYS AFTER THE FINAL DECISION AND DEVELOPMENT OSTIO PER ORS 197.610,OAR CHAPTER 660-DIVISION 18 j Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Local file number: CPA2009-00002 Date of Adoption: June 23, 2009 Date Mailed: June 29,•2009 Was a Notice of Proposed'Amendment (Form 1) mailed to DLCD? Yes Date: April 1, 2009 Z Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ❑ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ® Land Use Regulation Amendment ❑ Zoning Map Amendment ❑ New Land Use Regulation ❑ Other: Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached". Amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Transportation System Plan, and Tigard Community Development Code to allow vehicle parking on SW Main Street and, SW - Burnham Street and eliminate bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban • Renewal District. Does the Adoption differ from proposal? No, no explaination is necessary Plan Map Changed from: N/A to: N/A Zone Map Changed from: N/A to: N/A Location: Downtown Urban Renewal District Acres Involved: N/A Specify Density: Previous: N/A New: N/A Applicable statewide planning goals: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ►_� ❑ nnn ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n ® nnfEfl D Was an Exception.Adopted? DYES ® NO Did DLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment... { 45-days prior to first evidentiary hearing? ® Yes ❑ No If no, do the statewide planning,goals apply? ❑ Yes ❑ No If no, did Emergency Circumstances require immediate adoption? ❑ Yes ❑ No DLCD file No. 003-09 (17474) [15602] y I Please list all affected State c.). . ederal Agencies, Local Government.. or Special Districts: Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue,Tri-Met,Metro, and Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation. I ; Local Contact: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2437 Extension: 2437 Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Fax Number: 503-718-2748 City:.Tigard Zip: 97223 E-mail Address: cherylc®tigard-or.gov ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This form must be mailed to DLCD within 5 workine days after the final decision per ORS 197.610,OAR Chapter 660-Division 18. 1. Send this Form and TWO Complete Copies (documents and maps) of the Adopted Amendment to: ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST -DEPARTMENT OF.LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 635 CAPITOL STREET NE,SUITE 150 SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 2. Electronic Submittals: At least one hard copy must be sent by mail or in person, or by cmailing larry.french @state.or.us. 3. Please Note: Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than FIVE (5) working days • following the date of the final decision,on the amendment. 4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the text of the amendment plus adopted findings . and supplementary information. 5. The deadline to appeal will not be extended if you submit this notice of adoption within five working days of the final decision. Appeals to LUBA may be filed within twenty-one(21) days of the date, the Notice of Adoption is sent to DLCD. 6. In addition to sending the Notice of Adoption to DLCD,you must notify persons who participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. 7. Need More Copies? You can now access these forms online at http://www.lcd.state.or.us/. Please print on 8-l/2e I 1 t reeu paper only. You may also call the DLCD Office at(503) 373-0050; or Fax your request to: (503) 378-5518; or Email your request to larry.french@state.or.us-Attention: Plan Amendment Specialist. Updated March 17,2009 QTY OF TIGARD,OREGON TIGARD QTY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 09-Cfl AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOAL 12 - TRANSPORTATION, TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN CHAPTER 8, (CPA2009-00002), COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (DCA2009-00002) CHAPTER 18.810 — STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS, AND THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 10, TO ALLOW VEHICLE PARKING AND REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE BIKE LANES ON COLLECTOR STREETS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Section 18.380.020 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code requires legislative amendments to be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060; and WHEREAS, notice was provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development 45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing;and WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18, 2009,. and recommended approval of the proposed amendment with a 7-0 vote;and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearings was published in the Tigard Times Newspaper at least 10 business days prior to the public hearings;and . WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds that parking should be allowed and separate bike lanes should not always be required along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has considered applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; any applicable Metro regulations; any applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies; and any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found the following to be the applicable review criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) and Goal 15; and Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 12;and WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on June 23, 2009 to consider the proposed amendments;and WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council has determined that the proposed development code amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria, and that approving the request would be in the best interest of the City of Tigard. ORDINANCE No.09- 0 Page 1 NOW,THEREFORE,THE QTY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The attached findings (Exhibit A) are hereby adopted in explanation of the Council's decision. SECTION 2: The specific text amendments attached (Exhibit B) to this Ordinance are hereby adopted and approved by the City Council. SECIION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor,and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By ().nan;mot/is vote `i all Co cil members present after being read by number and title only,this day ay ,2009. La44e/tA;),Li therine Wheatley, i Re Y tY corder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this c:231"dday of ,Ag. ' 2009. AM" Craig Dirksen, .yor Ap'roved as to form City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No.09- 0 9 Page 2 MEETING RECORDS sr 7:53:57 PM Mayor Dirksen said the City Council has tried to engage the young people in the City more than they have been. The City Council makes plans for the future and "the future we are making those plans for,is your future probably more than it is even ours." Mayor Dirksen said the new Durham Road crosswalk was suggested by Tigard High School students. 7:55:47 PM 6. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS (CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002) a. Mayor Dirksen opened the public hearing. 7:55:59 PM b. City Attorney Ramis reviewed the hearing procedures. c. Declarations or Challenges: None. 7:59:25 PM d. 7:59:45 PM Associate Planner Caines presented the staff report. 'A copy of the report is on file in the City Recorder's office. • The proposed amendment is to allow vehicle parking and remove the requirement to have a separate bike lane on Downtown collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. Typically, parking is not allowed on collectors due to the higher volume and the higher traffic speeds, but the Downtown collector streets function differently—they connect arterials such as Hall Boulevard and Pacific Highway. These collectors also bring people to a destination. The proposed amendment will allow parking within the Downtown, which is essential for densely developed areas. This amendment will accommodate existing parking that is already on Ash Avenue, Burnham Street, and Main Street. The amendment,if adopted,will not mean that all bicycle lanes will be removed within the Downtown. The amendment will provide flexibility in the design of the streets for.future use. Where there is not a separate bike lane, there should be a shared vehicle traffic lane designed into those streets to accommodate both vehicles and bicycles. The City is currently undergoing its Periodic Review. The Transportation System Plan and the Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan are being updated. The City is putting together a circulation plan for the Downtown, which will improve connectivity through streets and pedestrian pathways. It will also establish street standards for the downtown. The City is designing and reconstructing some streets within the Downtown. Burnham Street reconstruction will be occurring soon. Burnham Street is being designed without bicycle travel lanes, but will have vehicle parking. Wider vehicle lanes on Burnham Street are designed to accommodate bicycles. A redesign of Main Street is under consideration. It is unclear, at this time,whether separate - bike lanes can be accommodated on Main Street because of the existing development, right-of-way width,and features such as Fanno Creek. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/LCRB MINUTES—June 23, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 5 of 12 • Until the above plans are finalized the proposed amendments, if approved, will give the City flexibility when the streets in the Downtown are designed. Comments were received during the comment period. One was from Metro Transportation Planner John Mermin, who generally supported the amendment except for the removal of the requirement for bike lanes along Main Street. Tigard's Transportation System Plan does not require bicycle lanes along Main Street. Staff understands Metro's concern•and will work closely with Metro as Main Street is designed to assure the bike traffic is accommodated and also provide parking for Downtown merchants and people coming to the Downtown. A comment was received from Hal Ballard, Executive Director of Washington Bicycle Transportation Coalition. Mr. Ballard generally supported the proposed amendments. Mr. Ballard said bicycles are better accommodated when they are treated like a vehicle. Associate Planner Caines said the design of Burnham Street fits within the recommendations in Mr.Ballard's comments. • • Associate Planner Caines reviewed options before the City Council: • Adopt as recommended by the Planning Commission (unanimous) • Deny with no changes to the current Code and Plans • Adopt as modified as a result of the City Council deliberations In response to a question from Councilor Buehner,Associate Planner Caines advised that Commercial Street is classified as a local street in Tigard's Transportation System Plan. Councilor Buehner suggested this might need to be reevaluated as the City goes through the Transportation System Plan review process. Associate Planner Caines said there has been some discussion by staff about making a separate classification for Downtown Streets. Mayor Dirksen said that a separate classification for Downtown Streets "is not a bad idea." Council President Wilson added that it might be good for any area where there is a commercial district with slow,high-volume traffic. 8:06:04 PM e. Public Testimony: None. f. Associate Planner Caines recommended that the City Council approve the proposed amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission. g. Council Questions: None. 8:06:40 PM h. Mayor Dirksen closed the public hearing. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 09-09 Motion by Council President Wilson,seconded by Councilor Webb, to adopt Ordinance No.09-09. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/LCRB MINUTES —June 23, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 6 of 12 ORDINANCE NO. 09-09 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOAL 12—TRANSPORTATION,TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN CHAPTER 8 (CPA2009-00002), COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (DCA2009- 00002) CHAPTER 18.810 — STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS, AND THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 10, TO ALLOW VEHICLE PARKING AND REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE BIKE LANES ON COLLECTOR • STREETS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Council discussion on the motion: Mayor Dirksen said he recently started riding a bicycle more often. As•Mr. Ballard commented, Mayor Dirksen said he is more comfortable when riding with the flow of traffic rather than in a bike lane as long as he is on a street where the speed limit is such that you can keep within the flow of traffic. He described the perils of turning left when the street has a bike lane configuration. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of City Council present. • Mayor Dirksen Yes Council President Wilson Yes Councilor Buehner Yes Councilor Henderson Yes Councilor Webb Yes 8:08:56 PM 7. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 2008-00011)— TIGARD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN AMENDMENTS TO INCORPORATE TIGARD 99W IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS a. Mayor Dirksen opened the public hearing. b. City Attorney Ramis noted there "is no one in the room now who wasn't previously in the room during the course of the prior proceeding. The rules will be same as we read previously and I will ask the City Recorder to include in the record a copy of the statement that I read." c. Declarations or Challenges: Does any Council member wish to declare or discuss a conflict of interest or abstention. There were none. 8:09:49 PiM • • d. Staff Report: Community Development Department Community Development Director Bunch presented the staff report. He acknowledged the contributions of Senior Planner Wyss and City Engineer Duenas on this project. The proposal comes to the City Council with the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission. Previously the City Council held a workshop, at which time no requests for alternative language were considered. This project is intended to update the Transportation System Plan. The recommendations of the Planning Commission were to include the changes found in Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan. The three main parts are: TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/LCRB MINUTES—June 23, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 7of12 "*aV€`j a 1. 5 i b r !1 .f i 120 DAYS =N/A C DATE MAILED: 6/29/2009 ® CITY OF TIGARD ): Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCIL Case Numbers: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2009-00002 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT(DCA) 2009-00002 Case Name: DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS Applicant's Name/Address: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 Owner's Names/Addresses: N/A Address of Property: The Downtown Urban Renewal District. Tax Map/Lot Nos.: N/A A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND A DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (ORDINANCE NO. 09-09). THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL HAVE REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN. THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON MAY 18, 2009 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE REQUEST. THE CITY COUNCIL ALSO HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON UNE 23, 2009 PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION ON THE REQUEST. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Subject: > A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 8.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8-10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130 - Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking on SW Main and SW Burnham Streets and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. AT THE 6/23/09 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING, THE COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THIS REQUEST(Ordinance No. 2009-09). ZONES: CBD: Central Business District and MUR 1: Mixed-Use High-Density Residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810;Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.2(c) and Goal 15;and Statewide Planning Goals 1,and 12. Action: > ® Approval as Requested ❑ Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper,posted at City Hall and mailed to: ® Affected Government Agencies ® Interested Parties Final Decision: THIS IS THE FINAL DECISION BY THE CITY AND IS EFFECTIVE ON JULY 23,2009. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) within 21 days according to their procedures. Ouestions: Call the City of Tigard Planning Division or the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. QTY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.09-09 AN ORDINANCE' AMENDING THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOAL 12 - TRANSPORTATION, TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN CHAPTER 8, (CPA2009-00002), COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (DCA2009-00002) CHAPTER 18.810 — STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS, AND THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 10, TO ALLOW VEHICLE PARKING AND REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE BIKE LANES ON COLLECTOR STREETS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Section 18.380.020 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code requires legislative amendments to be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060;and WHEREAS,notice was provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development 45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing;and WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18, 2009, and recommended approval of the proposed amendment with a 7-0 vote; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearings was published in the Tigard Times Newspaper at least 10 business days prior to the public hearings;and . WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds that parking should be allowed and separate bike lanes should not always be required along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District; . .. and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has considered applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; any applicable Metro regulations; any applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies; and any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances;and WHEREAS,the City Council has found the following to be the applicable review criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) and Goal 15; and Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 12; and WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on June 23, 2009 to consider the proposed amendments;and WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council has determined that the proposed development code amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria, and that approving the request would be in the best interest of the City of Tigard. •ORDINANCE No.09- 09 Page 1 NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECI1ON 1: The attached findings (Exhibit A) are hereby adopted in explanation of the Council's decision. SECTION 2: The specific text amendments attached (Exhibit B) to this Ordinance are hereby adopted and approved by the City Council. SECI1ON 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor,and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By (A n a n I m OAS vote of all Co ncil members present after being read by number and title only,thisQ ay , 2009. L 1,042 (_ therine Wheatley,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council thisr�day of ,2009. .0•4 4107./- Craig Dirksen, .yor Approved as to form City Attorney 2,..t.IAAJ2 Q3) -:400q Date 6 ORDINANCE No.09- 0 9 Page 2 • • EXHIBIT A Agenda Item: 5.2 Hearing Date: May 18.2009 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE ' oe PLANNING COMMISSION E., FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T 1 G, R 7r.= SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE NAME: DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS AMENDMENT CASE NOS.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) CPA2009-00002 Development Code Amendment(DCA) DCA2009-00002 PROPOSAL: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 12.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8- 10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130 —Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. • APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 ZONES: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, • including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre; equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows,medical centers,major event entertainment and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. MUR Mixed Use Residential Districts. The MUR zoning district is designed to apply to predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted when compatible with the residential use. A high density (MUR-1) and moderate density (1VMUJR-2) designation is available within the MUR zoning district. C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single- family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use.A wide range of uses,including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. Within the Tigard Triangle and Bull Mountain Road District, residential uses at a minimum density of STAFF REPOR"1• 10•1.111.PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2(X)9-O(X1)2 P\(;IS 1(N 6 DOWNTOWN(:012 :ci'OR S1RI:1;'1'STANDARDS conjunction with a commercial development. Heliports medical centers, religious institutions and utilities are permitted conditionally. Deveio ments in the GP zoning district are intended to serve as a buffer between residential areas and more-intensive commercial and industrial areas. LOCATION: Downtown Urban Renewal District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) and Goal 15;and'Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 12. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find in favor to amend the Tigard Development Code 18.810, Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2, Transportation System Plan Chapter 8 and Municipal Code Title 10 as proposed with any alterations as determined through the public hearing process and make a final recommendation to the Tigard City Council. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The proposal is to amend the street standards for collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. There are four collectors within the downtown (Main,Burnham and Scoffins Streets and Ash Avenue - Exhibit A. The current standard for collector streets does not permit on-street parking and requires bicycle lanes on all collector streets within the city. The proposed amendments will allow on-street parking along collectors within the downtown. In addition,the construction of designated bicycle lanes may not be required for all collectors within the downtown. The requirement for separate bile lanes would be determined by the City Engineer. This proposal allows flexibility in downtown street design until permanent standards can be adopted and allows on-street parking,which already exists along Main Street. PROPOSED CHANGES The proposed changes are as follows (Exhibit B): 1. Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards • Table 18.810.1,Figure 18.810.2.,and ; • Section 18.810.110 These changes will allow vehicle parking along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District and allow bike lane requirements to be determined by the City Engineer for the same downtown collectors. 2. Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) - remove the requirement to construct bike lanes in accordance with the Bicycle Master Plan along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. 3. Transportation System Plan Chapter 8 Motor Vehicles, Figure 8-10 (Arterial and Collector Sample Street Cross Sections) - the criteria within the chart regarding On Street Parking is being modified to allow exceptions. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009.00002/DCA2009•00002 PAGE 2 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS • 4. Tigard Municipal Code 10.28.130 - Remove the parking restriction for the north side of Burnham Street near the intersection with Hall Boulevard (Restriction #65). This is necessary because Burnham Street has been designed to allow parking in this area. All other Municipal Code parking restrictions on downtown collectors found in the Municipal Code will remain in effect. SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA Chapter 18.380 states that legislative text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060G. Chapter 18.390.060G states that the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors: 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; Forty-five day advance notice was provided to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) on April 2, 2009, more than 45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing as required. In addition, the Tigard Development Code (TCD) and Comprehensive Plan have been acknowledged by DLCD. The following are the applicable Statewide Planning Goals that are applicable to this proposal: 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; Statewide Planning Goal 1- Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and for changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. This goal has been met by complying with the Tigard Development Code notice requirements set forth in Chapter 18.390. Notice has been published in the Tigard Times Newspaper prior to the public hearing. In addition a notice was posted on the City website. Statewide Planning Goal 12 -Transportation This goal outlines provisions to insure a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. Transportation plans must consider all modes of transportation, meet local, regional, and state transportation needs and plan requirements, conserve energy, and facilitate the flow of goods and services. The proposed amendment will affect bicycle users by accommodating bicycle traffic in designated lanes or wider vehicle travel lanes. 3. Any applicable METRO regulations; There are no applicable Metro regulations under the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. The 2004 Regional Transportation Plan addresses street design from a region-wide perspective. The collector streets affected by this amendment are not considered regionally significant;therefore,the regional street design standards do not apply. 4. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COIvIIVIISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 3 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT Goal 1.1 Provide citizens, affected agencies and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2 The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. Goal 1.2 Ensure all citizens have access to: A. opportunities to communicate directly to the City; and B. information on issues in an understandable form. Policy 1. The City shall ensure pertinent information is readily accessible to the community and presented in such a manner that even technical information is easy to understand. Policy 2. The City shall utilize such communication methods as mailings, posters, newsletters, the internet, and any other available media to promote citizen involvement and continue to evaluate the effectiveness of methods used. Policy 6. The City shall provide opportunities for citizens to communicate to Council, boards and commissions, and staff regarding issues that concern them. The City has published notice of the hearing and posted the site pursuant to TDC 18.390.050 for Type IV Procedures. In addition, a copy of the hearing notice was posted on the City website. Public hearings will be held before the Planning Commission and City Council. With these public involvement provisions this application is consistent with applicable Citizen Involvement policies. TRANSPORTATION Goal 12.1 Transportation System Policy 2 (A) Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of transportation (including motor vehicle, bicycle,pedestrian, transit and other modes) by: The development of and implementation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility,pedestrian, bicycle,transit,truck and auto use. The proposed collector street standards will still accommodate multiple modes of traffic. Sidewalks are provided for pedestrians. Bicycles lanes or wider vehicle travel lanes are required to accommodate bicyclists. Policy 2 (C) Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master. All schools, parks, public facilities, and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. The policy requires bike lanes on all collectors consistent with the bicycle master plan. The Bicycle Master Plan (Figure 6-2) shows proposed bike lanes on Burnham Street, Scoffins Street, and Ash Avenue. Lanes are not shown on Main Street. As proposed, the amendment will allow streets to be designed with or without designated bike lanes within the downtown. Bicycles will still be accommodated by wider vehicle travel lanes STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 4 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS where bike lanes were not provided (e.g. Burnham Street). In addition, some off-street bicycle circulation is currently provided by the Fanno Creek Trail that runs parallel to Burnham Street. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS- DOWNTOWN Goal 15.4 Develop comprehensive street and circulation improvements for pedestrians, automobiles, bicycles, and transit. Policy 1. The downtown shall be served by a complete array of multi-modal transportation services including auto,transit, bike, and pedestrian facilities. As proposed,the collector street standards will serve multiple modes of travel including autos,transit,bike,and pedestrians. The City is currently working on a circulation plan for the downtown that will improve connectivity and establish street standards for the downtown. In addition, the City is also undertaking a comprehensive review of the Transportation System Plan (TSP). The proposed amendments will allow flexible street standards for the downtown until more appropriate standards can be established. 5. Any applicable provision of the City's implementing ordinances. Code Section 18.380 Zoning Map and Text Amendments: This section regulates amendments. It outlines the process for reviewing Development Code Text Amendments. The present amendment will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in the chapter. This procedure requires public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Code Section 18.390 Decision-Making Procedures: This chapter establishes standard decision-making procedures for reviewing applications. The amendment under consideration will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as detailed in the chapter. Code Section 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards: This section of the code provides standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The amendment modifies the collector standards to allow on-street parking in the downtown, but also eliminates the requirement for designated bicycle lanes. The removal of this requirement does not mean that bike lanes will not be provided, but provides options and flexibility for downtown street design. SECTION V. STAFF .ANALYSIS The current Comprehensive Plan (Transportaion Chapter), TSP, and Development Code street standards address collectors on a city-wide basis. Little consideration was given on how collectors might function in different areas of the city. In this case, downtown collectors serve not only as connectors between arterials such as Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard;they also transport users to a destination- Downtown Tigard. In addition to conveying traffic through the area and connecting to regional public transit available at the Tigard Transit Center, downtown collectors should also accommodate those wishing to spend time within the downtown by providing public parking options on the streets. On-street parking will be essential as the downtown redevelops to its intended dense form. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Q'A2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 5 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS Collector streets typically do not allow on-street parking due to the larger traffic volumes carried by collectors and the higher rates of speed which are permitted. In the downtown, the speeds will likely be lower than on a typical collector street and on-street parking also acts as a traffic calming device causing drivers to travel at lower speeds. Downtown streets are also likely to be designed differently and therefore, will function differently from other collectors within the city. The City is currently within Periodic Review and will be updating the TSP and Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition,a circulation plan is also being prepared for the downtown. As noted above this plan will improve connectivity and establish street standards for the downtown. The amendments being proposed with this application could be further altered, eliminated or replaced in the future. Until those plans are finalized, the proposed changes will allow some flexibility in the design of collectors within the downtown and accommodate existing on-street parking along Main Street. SECTION VI. OTHER ALTERNATIVES No Action — The code would remain unchanged. Parking will not be permitted on any collector in the City. Designated bicycle lanes will be required on all collector streets throughout the City. Alternate Actions — Apply the amendment to specific downtown collector streets. The public already parks along portions of Main Street, Burnham Street and Ash Avenue. Burnham Street has been redesigned to accommodate on-street parking. SECTION VII. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF & OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department,Engineering Division, Public Works Department,Long Range Planning Division, and the Current Planning Code Enforcement Officer were given copies of the proposed code amendment. Only Code Enforcement and Police responded with no objections. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, Clean Water Services (CWS), Metro, ODOT Rail, and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD) were notified of the proposed amendment. No written comments were received from most agencies. CWS responded with no concerns or objections to the proposed amendments, but did note that any improvements to upgrade streets to the new designations would require Storm Water Connection Permit approval. PRE ' 9 CO May 11,2009 PARE )BY: Cheryl Caines DATE Associate Planner May 11,2009 APPROVED-BY: Dick Bewers•orf DATE Planning Manager STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING ODMMZSSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009.00002 PAGE 6 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS h 1 _ EXHIBIT A teVirri remnrix-- No----mr.,,�1 Downtown Tigard : Collector Streets ' . .‘ \ May 7, 2009 I rCT City of Tigard - .\'�, _Oregon ___ .I • �`\ T .. ....3 w '`,.:4164 • ■ cr �, :. r F1+:z, :Jl� r' 1' •• \ �` \•,$'`�1. \ - 3 "Pas .k'...,,,,t; . . • 4 City Hall aa Collector Designation ': Urban Renewal District -�--1— Railroad o Park ' 0 250 500 1,000 Feet ` EXHIBIT B CPA2009-00002&DCA200900002 COLLECTOR STRkET:STANDAIRD A101,..1DMENT .:. May 11;2009 • . ,. • . • . • Explanation of FoilpattArit;;: . • . These text amendments ":.: • Text to be added • Proposed code language is as follows: Chapter 18.810 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.810.030 Streets Figure 18.810.2 Collector Sample Cross Sections in (Ord,02-33) 6-8 . 5' :6'Bike 11' 11 6'Bike.,5.5' 6-8' am_ 58.-62' 2 Lane 5842'RAN ,"• ••. -• : . - •.. : •„„ . Y.. 12'Median/ , 5.5' 6'Fil<e 11' J.ign Ldne 11' R/W 3 Lane 70'-74'R/14/ • • 12'Median/ 6-8', 5,5' ,6'Blie 11' 11' -..Jurn Lane_ . 11' . 11' ;6'80 5 , 6-8' RM_92'-96' 5 Lane 9296'R/W r”Parking is allowed on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District Bike lane requirements on these same collectors shall be determined by the City Engineer. Table 18.810.1 . Minimum Widths for Street Characteristics • �^, h .�7 bA. v w ,., 0 ,0 ,te a <s( ro A 4 Cl)u ^O Type of Street �• ,� :-o c �, y as v �, �' T� "� y cep° v � y ,•' . �i I143 co co Arterial 64'-128' Varies 2-7(Refer to I2' N/A 6'(New Streets) 8'(Res.&Ind. Zones) 5' 12'w TSP) 5'-6'(Existin: Streets 10' Comm. Zones Collector 58'-96' Varies 2-5 (Refer to 11' N/A 6' (New Streets)-al 6' (Res.&Ind.Zones) 5' 1241f TSP) ,ro • 8 5'-6' (Existing Streets)L51. 8' (Comm.Zones) Nei:,borhood Route 50'-58' 28'-36' 2 10' 8' 5'-6' 5'-642) 5' N/A Local: Industrial/Commercial 50' 36' 2 N/A 5'-642) 5' N/A Local: Residential N/A • Under 1500 ADT 54'/5003) 32'/28° 2 8' (both sides) N/A 5'-6'(2) 5' • Under 500 ADT 50146'03 28'/24'(3) 2 8'(one side) N/A • Under 200 ADT 46'/42'(3) 24'/20i(3) 2 (No Parkin:) N/A Cul-de-sac bulbs in 50' 42'radius N/A N/A N/A N/A Industrial and radius Commercial zones Cul-de-sac bulbs in 47' 40' radius N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Residential zones radius Alley: Residential 16' 16' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alley: Business 20' 20' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (Ord. 02-33) l Medians required for 5 and 7 lane roadways. They are optional for 3 lane roadways. 2 Sidewalk widths for these streets shall be 5 ft with landscape strip; 6 ft if against curb(if permitted in accordance with 18.810.070.C). 3"Skinny Street"roadway widths are permitted where cross section and review criteria are met. Refer to corresponding cross sections (Figures 18.810.3, 18.810.4 and 18.810.5)for details and conditions. `Parking is allowed on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District 5Bicycle lane requirements on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District shall be determined by the City Engineer. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all Arterial and Collector routes and where identified on the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan (TSP). Bike lane requirements along collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District shall be determined by the City Engineer. • • REi?l a . .-`r TRANSPORTATION a policy or implementation strategy specifically conflicts with the updated TSP, the specific policy or implementation strategy has been deleted. Section 1: Transportation System KEY FINDINGS • • o There are 22 intersections near or at capacity based on the 2001 Tigard Transportation System Plan. o There is no continuous bicycle network in Tigard. ® There are significant gaps in the sidewalk system with few interconnected • locations linking to schools, retail,parks, and transit. o Segments of Highway 217 and I-5 are over capacity and ORE 99W will continue to serve more through traffic in the future. o Future traffic models indicate ORE 99W and half of the signalized traffic intersections fail within 20 years assuming no improvements are made. o Travel time data on Highway 217 indicates that some of the slowest travel speed on the facility occurs in Tigard due to existing capacity issues and the need for interchange improvements. • In the development of the transportation system plan,seven goals were identified which were used as the guidelines for the development of the policies and implementation strategies. The goals were: livability, balanced . . transportation system,safety,performance,accessibility,goods movement, and coordination. GOAL: 12.1 Transportation System POLICIES: 1. Plan,design,and construct transportation facilities in a manner which enhances the livability of Tigard by: A. Proper location and design of transportation facilities. 12-2 City of Tigard I Comprehensive Plan 4F:'a • O-O TRANSPORTATION %= B. Encouraging pedestrian accessibility by providing secure and desirable �f'; wT Y P g safe� pedestrian routes. C. Addressing issues of excessive s' " pedesti z am~'Sc speeding and through traffic on local residential streets through a neighbor- t?cce�sr�� acts �;. hood traffic program. The program ovid,1.n `� ,• should address corrective measures ` 7. •• for existing problems and assure that cafe, secin e, development incorporates traffic calming. xnd cles�ritl�le ff. 2. Provide a balanced transportation system, E': incorporating all modes of transportation � �e�tr ZLi7J ; r (including motor vehicle,bicycle,pedes- trian,transit and other modes) by: t ` f r A. The development of and implemen- tation o_f public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility,pedestrian, bicycle, transit,truck and auto use. B. Coordination with TriMet,and/or any other transit providers serving Tigard, to improve transit service to Tigard. Fixed route transit will primarily use arterial and collector streets in Tigard. Development adjacent to transit routes will provide direct pedestrian accessibility. C. Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master plan, with the exception of collectors within the downtown urban renewal drstiict.All schools,parks,public facilities,and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. D. Construction of sidewalks on all streets within Tigard_ All schools, parks,public facilities,and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a sidewalk. •E. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recre- ational trails. F. Design local streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by providing connectivity and limiting•out-of-direction travel and provide connectivity to activity centers and destinations with a priority for bicycle and pedestrian connections. G. Tigard will participate in vehicle trip reduction strategies developed Comprehensive Plan . I City of Tigard 12-3 DKS Associates . Alk CITY OF TIGARD b Transportation •� ,0. System Plan t. ; ,... °t • Ill 5' i 6' 16'Bike 1 12' I 12' 16 Blke 1 6 1 5 li r I R/W 60' 1 • 2 Lane 60'RIW i' i `'► rr •12-14'Medla 15' 1 6' 16'Bike I 12'-13' 1 Turn Lone 12'-13' 16'Bike1 6' 15' 11� • 1 R/W 74' I 3*Lane 74'R/W (1 .Q 4 Q . `.■■ lliiiii Grp.�elT��ar 1111.16 ..:i_11 14'Medlorr I l 5' 1 6' 16'Bike{ 12' I 12' 1 Turn I r]ne I 12' 1 12' 16'Blke i 6' I 5' I i I ROW 98' 1 5*Lane 98'R/W • .4 12'Median( • 111 6' i 6' 16'Blke I 12' 1 12' I 12' i ii un I nne7C1 12' 1 12' 1 12' 1Bike 6' . 6' 1 6' 11'1 R1W 98' I 1 7*Lane 122'R/W Criteria Vehicle Lane Widths: Truck Route=12 ft. (minimum widths) Bus Route= 12 ft. 11 ft. (12 ft.Preferred) Collector 10-11 ft. . On Street Parking: None(with few existing exceptions) . Bicycle Lanes: New Construction=6 ft, (minimum widths( Reconstruction=5 to 6 ft. Sidewalks:(minimum width) 5-13 ft. Consider Curb Extensions • on Ped Routes Landscape Strips: Required , Medians: 5/7 Lane=Required 3 Lane=Optional Neighborhood Traffic Only Under Special Conditions: Management: Selected Measures Figure 8-10 *Note that sidewalk widths above 6 ft.may require additional right-of-way. ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR Where appropriate,the median/lane may not be provided resulting in 2,4 and SAMPLE STREET CROSS SECTIONS 6 lane cross sections. The removal of the center turn lane must consider both ® WIDTH 6� safety and pedestrian needs. REQUIRED iR 6t E® V !V • TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE terminus thereof; S.W. Genesis Loop, extending from the most southerly intersection thereof with S.W. 115th 49. Within the northerly half of S.W. Avenue easterly a distance of one hundred sixty- Walnut Place; also, within the southwest half of five feet; S.W. Walnut Place beginning at S.W. Pacific and, thence, extending a distance of one hundred 58. Along both sides of S.W. Durham Road seventy-five feet southeasterly along the curbline; between Hall Boulevard.and Pacific Highway; 50. Within a portion of the right-of-way of 59. Repealed by Ord. 95-32; S.W. Hampton Street being all that portion thereof lying between S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. 66th 60. Within the west half of the right-of-way Avenue; of S.W. 92nd Avenue, beginning at the intersection thereof with the south right-of-way 51. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; line of S.W. Durham Road; thence, extending southerly one thousand four hundred fifty feet; 52. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; 61. Within the right-of-way of S.W. 92nd 53. Within the southeast half of the most Avenue, beginning at a point which lies one southerly end of S.W. Main Street, beginning at thousand four hundred fifty feet southerly of the the intersection of the southeast curblines of S.W. south right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road; Pacific Highway and S.W. Main Street and thence, extending southerly one thousand one extending seventy-five feet along the Main Street hundred ninety feet; excepting therefrom the south curbline to a point; also, therein, beginning at a six hundred eighty feet of the west half thereof; point on the Main Street curbline which lies two hundred five feet from said intersecting curblines 62. Along the east side of S.W. 85th Avenue and extending thirty feet therealong to a point; from Durham Road to a point four hundred fifty feet south of the south curbline of Durham Road; 54. Within the westerly half of the right-of- way of 115th Avenue extending from the 63. On S.W. Yarns Street from S.W. 72nd intersection with S.W. Gaarde Street northerly to Avenue to a point one hundred twenty-five feet the intersection of S.W. Fonner Street; west of the west curbline of 72nd Avenue; 55. Within the northwesterly right-of-way 64. On S.W. Watkins Avenue from S.W. of S.W. McKenzie Street from a point twenty feet Pacific Highway to a point seventy-five feet west southeasterly from the intersection of the of the west curbline of Pacific Highway; centerlines at S.W. McKenzie St., and S.W. Grant St., to a point ninety feet southeasterly of the 65. Along the north side of S.W. Burnham• centerline intersection; - -- - • _ .• - .. • . : :. . • = 56. On the northwesterly half of S.W. Ash • :, ---• . .: . _ • - - - -•• . - . Avenue beginning at the northeast right-of-way warn-,Street; line of S.W. Commercial Street and extending thence northeasterly one hundred thirty-eight feet. 66. On S.W. 69th Avenue from Pacific Highway to a point one hundred fifty feet north of 57. Within the curblines on each side of the north curbline of Pacific Highway, measured 10-28-9. SE Update: 10/04 i w In p :soil E elcctroiic i mailed P M 2 DLCD Notice of Adoption Do THIS FORM MUST BE MAILED TO DLCD WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE FINAL DECISION - PER ORS 197.610,OAR CHAPTER 660-DIVISION 18 For DL CD i"`o" Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Local file number: CPA2009-00002 Date of Adoption: June 23, 2009 Date Mailed: June 29, 2009 Was a Notice of Proposed Amendment (Form 1) mailed to DLCD? Yes Date: April 1, 2009 ® Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ❑ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ® Land Use Regulation Amendment ❑ Zoning Map Amendment ❑ New Land Use Regulation ❑ Other: Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached". Amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Transportation System Plan, and Tigard Community Development Code to allow vehicle parking on SW Main Street and SW Burnham Street and eliminate bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. • Does the Adoption differ from proposal? No, no explaination is necessary Plan Map Changed from: N/A to: N/A Zone Map Changed from: N/A to: N/A Location: Downtown Urban Renewal District Acres Involved: N/A Specify Density: Previous: N/A New: N/A Applicable statewide planning goals: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Was an Exception Adopted? ❑ YES ® NO Did DLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment... 45-days prior to first evidentiary hearing? ® Yes ❑ No If no, do the statewide planning goals apply? [' Yes ❑ No If no, did Emergency Circumstances require immediate adoption? ❑ Yes ❑ No DLCD file No. Please list all affected State or r eral Agencies, Local Government • Special Districts: - • Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, Tri-Met, Metro, and Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation. • • Local Contact:• Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2437 Extension: 2437 .Address:13125 SW Hall Boulevard Fax Number: 503-718-2748 City: Tigard Zip: 97223 E-mail Address: cherylc @tigard-or.gov ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This form must be mailed to DLCD within 5 working days after the final decision per ORS 197.610,OAR Chapter 660-Division 18. 1. Send this Form and TWO Complete Copies (documents and maps) of the Adopted Amendment to: ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 2. Electronic Submittals: At least one hard copy must be sent by mail or in person, or by emailing larry.french @state.or.us. 3. Please Note: Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than FIVE (5) working days following the date of the final decision on the amendment. 4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the text of the amendment plus adopted findings • and supplementary information. 5. The deadline to appeal will not be extended if you submit this notice of adoption within five working days of the final decision. Appeals to LUBA may be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the date, the Notice of Adoption is sent to DLCD. 6. In addition to sending the Notice of Adoption to DLCD, you must notify persons who participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. 7. Need More Copies? You can now access these forms online at http://www.lcd.state.or.us/. Please print on 8-1/2x11 green parer only. You may also call the DLCD Office at(503) 373-0050; or Fax your request to: (503) 378-5518; or Email your request to larry.french @ state.or.us - Attention: Plan Amendment Specialist. Updated March 17,2009 r r • N U. Attn: Patty/Planning C RE: C'A2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 Downtown Collector St.Standards .1 r�r1 (co,For ra rn rn "Notice of Adoption" OFI" ICii4L ' , TIGq ; Postage �o\ Certified Fee 1111,1111 ft,firto ra O Return Receipt Fee I (Endorsement Required) , ��r Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) ` O rR •`' � Total Postage&Fees ru ent-o ATTN: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST ED OregonDept.ofLandConservation&Development •--- in Street,A .1 635 Capital Street NE,Suite 150 of PO Box IN [` Salem,OR 97301-2540 City,State.; I'S Form 3800.August r SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY • Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete )l'A. Signature//G 0 Addressee item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. 0 Agent L • Print your name and address on the reverse -livery so that we can return the card to you. B. •-•-ive. •y(Printed Name) it z • • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ❑Yes or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No I I ATTN! PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST Oregon Dept.of Land Conservation&Development 3. Service Type 635 Capital Street NE,Suite 150 Salem,OR 97301-2540 XI Certified Mail 0 Express Mail 0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number 7008 2 810 0001, 3 8 31 8835 (Transfer from service label) __ 102595-02-M-1540 PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt • ,, gm City of Tigard ° Tigard Business Meeting ® Agenda IG-}- RE .�.,�:i�S!?n`j?xl.. .mc.rraea;w.^a�.:�z-vrehaeaT ... .• .. asz,.• ...t ra.�•aase::slxx+3x+au:as..h.!�cuoeesaa, 1^�.._...t�cccrnvmaso�.veEr-r"�.'S-b�7=_�^ca^.--..^��s-_ ,�na TIGARD CITY COUNCIL,LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD (LCRB) & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY(CCDA) MEETING DATE: June 23, 2009 MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard—Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (l'UD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (1'DD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). CABLE VIEWERS: The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/LCRB/CCDA AGENDA—June 23, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of4 , _L F .3 , : City of Tigard :: 'si- aA I, .: . 744 'Tigard Business Meeting ® Agenda TdzGi-R-� .� . _..�.. . . '4"e.:ied w ,4 :saKa�+u�a....,z, wx , ..nrwaaas u--:5a:.v.:v:..s� -.*:-wxm- -....,.:,..,-,...we'. i<,...+r+x:K:c<r,.S.1.:ar..raa.' w�v�:n ,.�. _"c.-..�- -Tr.e. = TIGARD CITY COUNCIL,LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD (LCRB) & CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CCDA) MEETING DATE/TIME: June 23, 2009/6:30 p.m. Study Session and 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard—Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM ® STUDY SESSION o EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under ORS 192.660(2) (a) (d) and (h) to discuss employment of public officers, employees and agents; discuss labor negotiations; and current/pending litigation. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order- City Council,Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications&I.iaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 7:35 PM 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less,Please) • Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce Update • Citizen Communication—Sign Up Sheet • Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication 7:40 PM 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council and Local Contract Review Board) These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve City Council Minutes for April 28,2009 3.2 Approve FY 2009 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Local Solicitation Grant Application TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/LCRB/CCDA AGENDA—June 23, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 4 -- II 3.3 Enter into a Grant Agreement with Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) and an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Co-Grantee Clean Water Services (CWS) to Study Water Reuse Options in Downtown Tigard 3.4 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Washington County for Administration of Countywide Transportation Development Tax (IDT) and Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) — Resolution No. 09- 3.5 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Washington County for Flashing Yellow Arrow Project—Resolution No. 09- 3.6 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement with Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Relating to the Joint Development of the Walnut Street Fire Station and Expansion and Improvement of Jack Park 3.7 Approve Amendment to the Bylaws of the Transportation Advisory Committee—Resolution No. 09- 3.8 Local Contract Review Board: a. Award Two Contracts for Certified Arborist and Tree Services and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Contracts (Primary Contract to Davey Tree Expert Company; Secondary Contract to Buena Vista Arbor Care Company,Inc.) b. Award Contract for Tree Planting and Establishment Services to Mears Design Group and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Contract 7:45 PM 4. PRESENTATION: "IF I WERE MAYOR,I WOULD..." CONTEST WINNERS O Mayor Dirksen 8:00 PM 5. UPDATE: ACTIVITIES OF THE TIGARD YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL (TYAC) e Police Department 8:15 PM 6. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS (CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002) a. Open Public Hearing b. Review Hearing Procedures: City Attorney c. Declarations or Challenges: Does any Council member wish to declare or discuss a conflict of interest or abstention. d. Staff Report Community Development Department e. Public Testimony Proponents Opponents f. Staff Recommendation g. Council Questions h. Close Public Hearing i. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 09- TIGARD CITY COUNCIL./LCRB/CCDA AGENDA—June 23, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 3 of 8:35 PM 7. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 2008-00011) — TIGARD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN AMENDMENTS TO INCORPORATE TIGARD 99W IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS a. Open Public Hearing b. Review Hearing Procedures: City Attorney c. Declarations or Challenges: Does any Council Member wish to declare or discuss a conflict of interest or abstention. d. Staff Report Community Development Department e. Public Testimony Proponents Opponents f. Staff Recommendation g. Council Questions h. Close Public Hearing i. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 09- 9:15 PM 8. UPDATE: URBAN/RURAL RESERVES COMMIT-1'EE Community Development Department 9. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 10. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 9:30 PM 11. ADJOURNMENT I:\ADM\CATHY\CCA\2009\090623 business.doc TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/LCRB/CCDA AGENDA—June 23, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 4 of4 Agenda Item # r Meeting Date June 23,2009 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY City Of Tigard, Oregon Issue/Agenda Title Downtown Collector Street Standards Comprehensive Plan and Development Code Amendments (CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002). Prepared By: Cheryl Gaines Dept Head Approval: 6/4-- City Mgr Approval: d ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the City Council approve an ordinance amending the Tigard Comprehensive Plan,Transportation System Plan, Community Development Code,and Tigard Municipal Code to allow parking and not to require separate bike lanes along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY • The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking and remove the requirement for separate bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. Downtown collectors include Main Street, Burnham Street,Scoffins Street,and Ash Avenue. • Currently on-street parking is not permitted on collector streets due to traffic volumes and rates of speed, but parking exists on Main, Burnham, and Ash. Downtown collectors will have lower posted rates of speed. On- street parking and design elements such as crosswalk bump-outs will also lower traffic speeds on downtown streets. • On-street parking will be essential as the downtown redevelops to its intended dense form. • Separate bike lanes are currently required on collectors. This amendment will provide the City flexibility when designing downtown collectors to either provide a bike lane or wider, shared vehicle/bike lanes. The City Engineer will determine on a case by case basis, whether separate bike lanes should be required on individual collector streets within the downtown. • The City is in the process of updating the Transportation System Plan and Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as developing a circulation plan for the downtown. These plans will eventually determine connectivity patterns and street standards within the downtown. In the meantime, these proposed amendments allow the City flexibility when designing/building downtown streets. • Burnham Street is a collector. It has been re-designed with on-street parking and a shared vehicle/bicycle lane and therefore will not meet City standards. This amendment will result in the new design meeting City standards and allow use of Traffic Impact Fee dollars as a funding mechanism for construction of Burnham Street. • The future design of Main Street is currently being discussed. Right-of-way is limited due to existing development and natural features such as Fanno Creek. There may not be room for separate bike lanes and the on-street parking. Metro would like bike lanes along Main Street, but ironically the Bicycle Master Plan requires separate bike lanes on all downtown collectors except Main Street. We are working with Metro on a design that considers all stakeholders. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED No Action- The code would remain unchanged. Parking will not be permitted on any collector in the City. Designated bicycle lanes will be required on all collector streets throughout the City. Alternate Actions - Apply the amendment only to specific downtown collector streets. CITY COUNCIL GOALS 2009 Goal##2- Implement Downtown Urban Renewal. This amendment will adopt street standards that affect the construction and design of Burnham Street and permit parking along downtown collectors. ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment 1: Ordinance Exhibit A: Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated May 11, 2009 Exhibit B: Amendments to the Community Development Code, Comprehensive Plan, Transportation System Plan, and Tigard Municipal Code Attachment 2: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated May 18, 2009 Attachment 3: E-mail from John Mermin,Metro Transportation Planner(distributed at PC meeting- Exhibit E) Attachment 4: E-mail from Hal Ballard,Executive Director of the Washington County Bicycle Transportation Coalition FISCAL NOTES There is no fiscal impact anticipated for this action. TTY OF TIGARD, OREGON Attachment 1 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 09- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOAL 12 - TRANSPORTATION, TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN CHAPTER 8, (CPA2009-00002), COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (DCA2009-00002) CHAPTER 18.810 — STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS, AND THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 10, TO ALLOW VEHICLE PARKING AND REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE BIKE LANES ON COLLECTOR STREETS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Section 18.380.020 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code requires legislative amendments to be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060; and WHEREAS, notice was provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development 45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18, 2009,. and recommended approval of the proposed amendment with a 7-0 vote; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearings was published in the 'Tigard Times Newspaper at least 10 business days prior to the public hearings; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds that parking should be allowed and separate bike lanes should not always be required along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has considered applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; any applicable.Metro regulations; any applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies; and any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found the following to be the applicable review criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) and Goal 15; and Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 12; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on June 23, 2009 to consider the proposed amendments;and WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council has determined that the proposed development code amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria, and that approving the request would be in the best interest of the City of Tigard. ORDINANCE No. 09- Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE,THE _,iTY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS F\_,LLOWS: SECIlON 1: The attached findings (Exhibit A) are hereby adopted in explanation of the Council's decision. SECliON 2: The specific text amendments attached (Exhibit B) to this Ordinance are hereby adopted and approved by the City Council. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 2009. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of , 2009. Craig Dirksen,Mayor Approved as to form City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 09- Page 2 EXHIBIT A Agenda Item: 5.2 Hearing Date: May 18,2009 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION yKt. FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 4,: 1 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE NAME: DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS AMENDMENT CASE NOS.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) CPA2009-00002 'Development Code Amendment (DCA) DCA2009-00002 PROPOSAL: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and DevelopmentCode Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 12.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8- 10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130 —Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 ZONES: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, - including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre; equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment,utilities, facilities with drive-up windows,medical centers,major event entertainment and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. MUR: Mixed Use Residential Districts. The MUR zoning district is designed to apply to -predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted when compatible wita the residential use. A high density (MUR-1) and moderate density (MUR-2) designation is available within the MUR zoning district. C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single- family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event • entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. Within the Tigard Triangle and Bull Mountain Road District, residential uses at a minimum density of STAFF REPORT TO TI ILF,P1,ANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 1 OF 6 DOWNTOWN CO].i.l?:C1'OR S'1RI?I.I STANDARDS conjunction with a commercial development. Heliports medical centers, religious institutions and utilities are permitted conditionally. Developments in the C-P zoning district are intended to serve as a buffer between residential areas and more-intensive commercial and industrial areas. LOCATION: Downtown Urban Renewal District. APPLICABLE RE VIE W CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) and Goal 15; and Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 12. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find in favor to amend the Tigard Development Code 18.810, Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2, Transportation System Plan Chapter 8 and Municipal Code Title 10 as proposed with any alterations as determined through the public hearing process and make a final recommendation to the Tigard City Council. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The proposal is to amend the street standards for collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. There are four collectors within the downtown (Main,Burnham and Scoffins Streets and Ash Avenue - Exhibit A. The current standard for collector streets does not permit on-street parking and requires bicycle lanes on all collector streets within the city. The proposed amendments will allow on-street parking along collectors within the downtown. In addition, the construction of designated bicycle lanes may not be required for all collectors within the downtown. The requirement for separate bike lanes would be determined by the City Engineer. This proposal allows flexibility in downtown street design until permanent standards can be adopted and allows on-street parking,which already exists along Main Street. PROPOSED CHANGES The proposed changes are as follows (Exhibit B): 1. Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards • Table 18.810.1, Figure 18.810.2., and ; • Section 18.810.110 These changes will allow vehicle parking along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District and allow bike lane requirements to be determined by the City Engineer for the same downtown collectors. 2. Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) - remove the requirement to construct bike lanes in accordance with the Bicycle Master Plan along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. 3. Transportation System Plan Chapter 8 Motor Vehicles, Figure 8-10 (Arterial and Collector Sample Street Cross Sections) - the criteria within the chart regarding On Street Parking is being modified to allow exceptions. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CP A2009-00002/D CA2009-00002 PAGE 2 OF 6 • DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS 4. Tigard Municipal Code 10.28.130 - Remove the parking restriction for the north side of Burnham Street near the intersection with Hall Boulevard (Restriction #65). This is necessary because Burnham Street has been designed to allow parking in this area. All other Municipal Code parking restrictions on downtown collectors found in the Municipal Code will remain in effect. SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA Chapter 18.380 states that legislative text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060G. Chapter 18.390.060G states that the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors: 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; Forty-five day advance notice was provided to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) on April 2, 2009, more than 45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing as required. In addition, the Tigard Development Code (T®) and Comprehensive Plan have been acknowledged by DLCD. The following are the applicable Statewide Planning Goals that are applicable to this proposal: 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; Statewide Planning Goal 1 - Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and for changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. This goal has been met by complying with the Tigard Development Code notice requirements set forth in Chapter 18.390. Notice has been published in the Tigard Times Newspaper prior to the public hearing. In addition a notice was posted on the City website. Statewide Planning Goal 12 - Transportation This goal outlines provisions to insure a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. Transportation plans must consider all modes of transportation, meet local, regional, and state transportation needs and plan requirements, conserve energy, and facilitate the flow of goods and services. The proposed amendment will affect bicycle users by accommodating bicycle traffic in designated lanes or wider vehicle travel lanes. 3. Any applicable METRO regulations; There are,no applicable Metro regulations under the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. The 2004 Regional Transportation Plan addresses street design from a region-wide perspective. The collector streets affected by this amendment are not considered regionally significant;therefore,the regional street design standards do not apply. 4. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 3 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COI T FCTOR STREET STANDARDS CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT Goal 1.1 Provide citizens, affected agencies and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2 The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. Goal 1.2 Ensure all citizens have access to: A. opportunities to communicate directly to the City; and B. information on issues in an understandable form. Policy 1. The City shall ensure pertinent information is readily accessible to the community and presented in such a manner that even technical information is easy to understand. Policy 2. The City shall utilize such communication methods as mailings, posters, newsletters, the Internet, and any other available media to promote citizen involvement and continue to evaluate the effectiveness of methods used. Policy 6. The City shall provide opportunities for citizens to communicate to Council, boards and commissions, and staff regarding issues that concern them. The City has published notice of the hearing and posted the site pursuant to '1'DC 18.390.050 for Type IV Procedures. In addition, a copy of the hearing notice was posted on the City website. Public hearings will be held before the Planning Commission and City Council. With these public involvement provisions this application is consistent with applicable Citizen Involvement policies. TRANSPORTATION Goal 12.1 Transportation System Policy 2 (A) Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of transportation (including motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, transit and other modes) by: The development of and implementation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility,pedestrian, bicycle, transit, truck and auto use. The proposed collector street standards will still accommodate multiple modes of traffic. Sidewalks are provided for pedestrians. Bicycles lanes or wider vehicle travel lanes are required to accommodate bicyclists. • Policy 2 (C) Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master. All schools, parks, public facilities, and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. The policy requires bike lanes on all collectors consistent with the bicycle master plan. The Bicycle Master Plan (Figure 6-2) shows proposed bike lanes on Burnham Street, Scoffins Street, and Ash Avenue. Lanes are not shown on Main Street. As proposed, the amendment will allow streets to be designed with or without designated bike lanes within the downtown. Bicycles will still be accommodated by wider vehicle travel lanes STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMtIIISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 4 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS where bike lanes were not provided (e.g. Burnham Street). In addition, some off-street bicycle circulation is currently provided by the Fanno Creek Trail that runs parallel to Burnham Street. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS - DOWNTOWN Goal 15.4 Develop comprehensive street and circulation improvements for pedestrians, automobiles, bicycles, and transit. Policy 1. The downtown shall be served by a complete array of multi-modal transportation services including auto, transit, bike, and pedestrian facilities. As proposed, the collector street standards will serve multiple modes of travel including autos, transit, bike, and pedestrians. The City is currently working on a circulation plan for the downtown that will improve connectivity and establish street standards for the downtown. In addition, the City is also undertaking a comprehensive review of the Transportation System Plan (TSP). The proposed amendments will allow flexible street standards for the downtown until more appropriate standards can be established. 5. Any applicable provision of the City's implementing ordinances. Code Section 18.380 Zoning Map and Text Amendments: This section regulates amendments. It outlines the process for reviewing Development Code Text Amendments. The present amendment will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in the chapter. This procedure requires public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Code Section 18.390 Decision-Making Procedures: This chapter establishes standard decision-making procedures for reviewing applications. The amendment under consideration will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as detailed in the chapter. Code Section 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards: This section of the code provides standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The amendment modifies the collector standards to allow on-street parking in the downtown, but also eliminates the requirement for designated bicycle lanes. The removal of this requirement does not mean that bike lanes will not be provided, but provides options and•flexibility for downtown street design. SECTION V. STAFF ANALYSIS The current Comprehensive Plan (Transportaion Chapter), TSP, and Development Code street standards address collectors on a city-wide basis. Little consideration was given on how collectors might function in different areas of the city. In this case, downtown collectors serve not only as connectors between arterials such as Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard; they also transport users to a destination- Downtown Tigard. In addition to conveying traffic through the area and connecting to regional public transit available at the Tigard Transit Center, downtown collectors should also accommodate those wishing to spend time within the downtown by providing public parking options on the streets. On-street parking will be essential as the downtown redevelops to its intended dense form. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/D0A2009-00002 PAGE 5 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COT I FCI'OR STREET STANDARDS Collector streets typically do not allow on-street parking due to the larger traffic volumes carried by collectors and the higher rates of speed which are permitted. In the downtown, the speeds will likely be lower than on a typical collector street and on-street parking also acts as a traffic calming device causing drivers to travel at lower speeds. Downtown streets are also likely to be designed differently and therefore, will function differently from other collectors within the city. The City is currently within Periodic Review and will be updating the TSP and Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, a circulation plan is also being prepared for the downtown. As noted above this plan will improve connectivity and establish street standards for the downtown. The amendments being proposed with this application could be further altered, eliminated or replaced in the future. Until those plans are finalized, the proposed changes will allow some flexibility in the design of collectors within the downtown and accommodate existing on-street parking along Main Street. SECTION VI. OTHER ALTERNATIVE S No Action - The code would remain unchanged. Parking will not be permitted on any collector in the City. Designated bicycle lanes will be required on all collector streets throughout the City. Alternate Actions - Apply the amendment to specific downtown collector streets. The public already parks along portions of Main Street, Burnham Street and Ash Avenue. Burnham Street has been redesigned to accommodate on-street parking. SECTION VII. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF & OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department, Engineering Division, Public Works Department, Long Range Planning Division, and the Current Planning Code Enforcement Officer were given copies of the proposed code amendment. Only Code Enforcement and Police responded with no objections. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, Clean Water Services (CWS), Metro, ODOT Rail, and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) were notified of the proposed amendment. No written comments were received from most agencies. CWS responded with no concerns or objections to the proposed amendments, but did note that any improvements to upgrade streets to the new designations would require Storm Water Connection Permit approval. • 7 L&- v-ii.3) May 11, 2009 PREPARE BY: Cheryl Gaines r1'1 DA 1E Associate Planner ,1-------- -.77 (______ ,,...r 5-4."‘„6„,ex, 9 , 1----- . May 11, 2009 APPROVED-$Y: Dick Bewer orff- DATE. Planning Manager STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 6 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS . EXHIBIT A ..•j 4,..,„,.. Downtown Tigard _____ . Collector Streets May 7, 2009 Y . ,T City of Tigard a 1 Oregon 1 1 t , ; - ' - '%C4 , . ' Y;. ii N .,'7.""- 0, \ .. .,`;'gym tom yC. , ,r ' tio�Ty<; • • It '?' :PN • 4. Se,, City Hall Collector Designation .. Urban Renewal District ____ N tt Railroad a ,1 - Park 1 0 250 500 1,000 / -- Feet --- - r -- ' , V'C-- , r—t•T-----1 EXFIIBIT B CPA2009-00002 & DCA2009-00002 COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS AMENDMENT • May 11; 2009 • Explanation of FOrmattifig These text amendments employ the following formatting: . .• - [Bold;Underline and —Text to be added Proposed code language is as follows: Chapter 18.810 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.810.030 Streets Figure 18.810.2 Collector Sample Cross Sections L11 (Ord,02-33) ant 6-8 5.5' 6'Bike 11' 11' 6'Bike 5.5' 6-8'. R/W 58'-62' 2 Lane 58'-62'R/W .r. _ Alma Frittimir 12'Turn i an/ 6-8' 5.5' 6'Bike n 11' Lone 11' 6'Bike.5.5' 6-8' R/W 70'-74' 3 Lane 70'-74'R/141 •- •. . . _ --- ,'441 *; "maw , 12'Median/ 5 6-8' 5.5' &Bike,, 11' 11' T.urn Lane 11' 11' 6ke 5.5' , 6-8' RJW_92'-96' 5 Lane 921-96'RAN flIParkine is allowed on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District Bike lane requirements on these same collectors shall be determined by the City Erteineer. Table 18.810.1 Minimum Widths for Street Characteristics z 4 CIA ' es —. a.—, +. Type of Street n c a" `� cb _ i ,15 _ e�a � � � �_ 5 � bra, c g3 � 4 P el IS Arterial 64'-128' Varies 2 - 7(Refer to 12' N/A 6' (New Streets) 8' (Res. & Ind. Zones) 5' I L'(') TSP) 5'-6' (Existin! Streets) 10' (Comm. Zones) Collector 58'-96' Varies 2 - 5 (Refer to 11' N/A 6' (New Streets)- 6' (Res. &Ind. Zones) 5' 12'(') TSP) (4J 8, 5'-6' (Existin: Streets) 8' (Comm. Zones) Neighborhood Route 50'-58' 28'-36' 2 10' 1 8' 5'-6' 5'-6'(2) 5' N/A Local: Industrial/Commercial 50' 36' 2 N/A 5'_6'(2) 5' N/A Local: Residential N/A • Under 1500 ADT 54'/50'(3) 32'/28'M 2 8' (both sides) N/A 5'-6'(2) 5' • Under 500'ADT 50'/46'3) 28'/24'° 2 8' (one side) N/A • Under 200 ADT 46'/42''(3) 24'/20'(3) 2 (No Parking) N/A Cul-de-sac bulbs in 50' 42' radius N/A N/A N/A N/A Industrial and radius Commercial zones Cul-de-sac bulbs in 47' 40' radius N/A N/A N/A N/A ,A Residential zones radius Alley: Residential 16' 16' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alley: Business 20' 20' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (Ord. 02-33) 'Medians required for 5 and 7 lane roadways. They are optional for 3 lane roadways. 2 Sidewalk widths for these streets shall be 5 ft with landscape strip; 6 ft if against curb(if permitted in accordance with 18.810.070.C). 3"Skinny Street"roadway widths are permitted where cross section and review criteria are met. Refer to corresponding cross sections (Figures 18.810.3, 18.810.4 and 18.810.5) for details and conditions. 4 Parking is allowed on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. 5Bicycle lane requirements on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District shall be determined by the City Engineer. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all Arterial and Collector routes and where identified on the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan (TSP). Bike lane requirements along collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District shall be determined by the City Engineer. - TRANSPORTATION a policy or implementation strategy specifically conflicts with the updated TSP, the specific policy or implementation strategy has been deleted. Section 1: Transportation System • KEY FINDINGS ▪ There are 22 intersections near or at capacity based on the 2001 Tigard Transportation System Plan. ® There is no continuous bicycle network in Tigard. ® There are significant gaps in the sidewalk system with few interconnected locations linking to schools, retail, parks, and transit. • Segments of Highway 217 and I-5, are over capacity and ORE 99W will continue to serve more through traffic in the future. ® Future traffic models indicate ORE 99W and half of the signalized traffic intersections fail within 20 years assuming no improvements are made. ▪ Travel time data on Highway 217 indicates that some of the slowest travel speed on the facility occurs in Tigard due to existing capacity issues and the need for interchange improvements. ® In the development of the transportation system plan, seven goals were identified which were used as the guidelines for the development of the policies and implementation strategies. The goals were: livability, balanced transportation system, safety,performance, accessibility, goods movement, and coordination. fv-f,A L.. 12.1 Transportation System POLICIES: 1. Plan, design, and construct transportation facilities in a manner which enhances the livability of Tigard by: A. Proper location and design of transportation facilities. 12-2 City of Tigard I Comprehensive Plan • • TRANSPORTATION >` B. Encouraging pedestrian accessibility by providing safe, secure and desirableT �' SGt' pedestrian routes. edestriJin C. Addressing issues of excessive speeding and through traffic on local raccesszzlity residential streets through a neighbor- hood traffic program. The program i*.. should address corrective measures f for existing problems and assure that development incorporates traffic calmin g" .Nand desirable 2. Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of transportation pedestrian b (including motor vehicle bicycle, P edes trian, routes,", transit and other modes) by: A. The development of and implemen- tation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility, pedestrian, bicycle, transit, truck and auto use. B. Coordination with TriMet, and/or any other transit providers serving Tigard, to improve transit service to Tigard. Fixed route transit will primarily use arterial and collector streets in Tigard. Development adjacent to transit routes will provide direct pedestrian accessibility. C. Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master plan, with the exception of collectors within the downtown urban renewal district.All schools, parks, public facilities, and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. -D. Construction of sidewalks on all streets within Tigard. All schools, parks,public facilities, and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a sidewalk. E. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recre- ational trails. F. Design local streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by providing connectivity and limiting out-of-direction travel and provide connectivity to activity centers and destinations with a priority for bicycle and pedestrian connections. G. Tigard will participate in vehicle trip reduction strategies developed Comprehensive Plan . I City of Tigard 12-3 DKS Associates • • .4Ik . CITY OF TIGARD Transportation -.11•1!kr System Plan• al r, rig r:i _ ,i Ilt 5' I 6' 16'Bike I 12' i 12' 16'Blke I 6' 1 5' 11� R/W 60' I • 2 Lane 60'WIN `4 P 4 ,_ i, ...:: i -•.:r�s;_ 12'-14'Medlo / 11' 5' 1 6' 16'Bike 1 12'-13' I Turn Lone I 12'-13' 16'Bikel 6 15 11' R/W 74' I , 3* Lane 74'R/W • .A ,a •i ii • 4i J _ - �.. z 14'Median I l� 5' I 6' 16 Bike 1 12' 1 12' I Turn lone 1 12' I 12' 16'Bike 1 6' 1 5' Ili R/W 98' I 5*Lane 98'R/W .4 ilk_ ��� .1 s _ v _ . r. 12'Medion 11� 6' 1 6' 16'Bike 1 12' I 12 i 12' I Turn Lone*1 12' 1 12' 1 12' (Bike 6'i . 6' 1 6' it I 1 . R/W 98' 1 7* Lane 122'!VW Criteria Vehicle Lane Widths: Truck Route= 12 ft. (minimum widths) Bus Route= 12 ft. 11 ft. (12 ft.Preferred) Collector 10-11 ft. On Street Parking: None(with few existing exceptions) • Bicycle Lanes: New Construction= 6 ft. (minimum widths) Reconstruction=5 to 6 ft. Sidewalks:(minimum width) 5-13 ft. Consider Curb Extensions • on Ped Routes Landscape Strips: Required Medians: 5/7 Lane=Required • 3 Lane=Optional Neighborhood Traffic Only Under Special Conditions: Manaement: Selected Measures �++ Figure 8-10 9a Note that,sidewalk widths above 6 ft.may require additional right-of-way ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR Where appropriate,the median/lane may not be provided resulting in 2,4 and SAMPLE STREET CROSS SECTIONS 6 lane cross sections. The removal of the center turn lane must consider both REQUIRED ROW WIDTH safety and pedestrian needs. R RE Rt TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE terminus thereof; S.W. Genesis Loop, extending from the most southerly intersection thereof with S.W. 115th 49. Within the northerly half of S.W. Avenue easterly a distance of one hundred sixty- Walnut Place; also, within the southwest half of five feet; S.W. Walnut Place beginning at S.W. Pacific and, thence, extending a distance of one hundred 58. Along both sides of S.W. Durham Road seventy-five feet southeasterly along the curbline; between Hall Boulevard.and Pacific Highway; 50. Within a portion of the right-of-way of 59. Repealed by Ord. 95-32; S.W. Hampton Street being all that portion thereof lying between S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. 66th 60. Within the west half of the right-of-way Avenue; of S.W. 92nd Avenue, beginning at the intersection thereof with the south right-of-way 51. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; line of S.W. Durham Road; thence, extending southerly one thousand four hundred fifty feet; 52. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; 61. Within the right-of-way of S.W. 92nd 53. Within the southeast half of the most , Avenue, beginning at a point which lies one southerly end of S.W. Main Street, beginning at thousand four hundred fifty feet southerly of the the intersection of the southeast curblines of S.W. south right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road; Pacific Highway and S.W. Main Street and thence, extending southerly one thousand one extending seventy-five feet along the Main Street hundred ninety feet; excepting therefrom the south curbline to a point; also, therein, beginning at a six hundred eighty feet of the west half thereof; point on the Main Street curbline which lies two hundred five feet from said intersecting curblines 62. Along the east side of S.W. 85th Avenue and extending thirty feet therealong to a point; from Durham Road to a point four hundred fifty feet south of the south curbline of Durham Road; 54. Within the westerly half of the right-of- way of 115th Avenue extending from the 63. On S.W. Varns Street from S.W. 72nd intersection with S.W. Gaarde Street northerly to Avenue to a point one hundred twenty-five feet the intersection of S.W. Former Street; west of the west curbline of 72nd Avenue; 55. Within the northwesterly right-of-way 64. On S.W. Watkins Avenue from S.W. of S.W. McKenzie Street from a point twenty feet Pacific Highway to a point seventy-five feet west southeasterly from the intersection of the of the west curbline of Pacific Highway; centerlines at S.W. McKenzie St., and S.W. Grant St., to a point ninety feet southeasterly of the _ - - : • •• centerline intersection; - - • - • - • '- =• - • • - • -- • • - - - 56. On the northwesterly half of S.W. Ash .. . . :, - - • - Avenue beginning at the northeast right-of-way ; line of S.W. Commercial Street and extending thence northeasterly one hundred thirty-eight feet. 66. On S.W. 69th Avenue from Pacific Highway to a point one hundred fifty feet north of 57. Within the curblines on each side of the north curbline of Pacific Highway, measured 10-28-9. SE Update: 10/04 Attachment 2 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes May 18,2009 1. CALL TO ORDER President Inman called the meeting to order at 7:07 PM. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center,Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL President Inman;Vice President Walsh; Commissioners Anderson, Caffall, Doherty, Fishel, Muldoon, and alternate Commissioner Gaschke Commissioners Absent: Commissioners Hasman and Vermilyea Staff Present: ' = - = • -, = • - • ` - . _ . -- - - - - (amended on 6/1/09); Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner; Gary Pagenstecher,Associate Planner; Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineering Manager; Doreen Laughlin, Planning Commission Secretary 3. COMMUNICATIONS—None. 4. CONSIDER MEETING MINUTES 5-4-09 Meeting Minutes: President Inman asked if there were any corrections, deletions, or additions to the minutes. There was one amendment. The amendment was that V.P. Walsh opened the 5-4-09 meeting, not President Inman. All agreed to the amendment and President Inman declared the minutes approved as amended. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 Tigard Retail Center— PDR2008-00001 PUBLIC HEARING OPENED President Inman opened the hearing and read required statements and procedural items from the quasi-judicial hearing guide. When the commission was asked whether there were any ex parte contacts or site visits, Commissioner Muldoon noted that he'd made a site visit and had asked general questions without specific application to Energy Trust of Oregon and Oregon Department of Energy—both without project specificity. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 1 of 8 I Y No one in the audience wished to challenge the jurisdiction of the commission. No conflicts of interest. STAFF REPORT Associate Planner, Gary Pagenstecher, distributed a memo from Officer Jim Wolf, of the Tigard Police Dept., commenting on Tigard Retail Center (Target) and lack of defensible space (Exhibit A). He also distributed an email from Commissioner Muldoon and an article from the Oregonian (Exhibit B). He then gave the staff report on behalf of the City. [Staff reports are available for review one week before scheduled public hearings.] Pagenstecher briefly reviewed the direction given to the applicant at the earlier hearing. QUESTIONS & COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS Can we waive the dock requirement?The requirement is for a loading space, not a dock, so it • doesn't necessarily mean the building has to incorporate a dock area. To address your specific question, the standard requirement- loading"space" - for a building 10,000 sq ft or larger - can be achieved in the parking field adjacent to the building with a space that's large enough. APPLICANTS PRESENTATION Eric Sporre—Vice President with Pac Trust, distributed a packet for the Commissioners to refer to while they were giving their presentation (Exhibit C). He said he was assuming that no one wanted to hear the history of the site and that they'd move forward. No one objected. He noted that they'd been there last on December 1st and there were a series of questions that they'd spent a considerable amount of time researching the answers to. He said Marc Butorac with Kittelson would be here to discuss traffic. Hal Beighley of Beighley and Associates will discuss landscape. Ken Grimes will touch on design and sustainability issues. He noted they'd received the staff report a week earlier and that they take exception to a number of things in the report. First and foremost is the 50% tree canopy. He said that goes far beyond what the direction of the Planning Commission was. It goes way beyond any code requirements and any recent land use decisions. It's just not feasible and far too costly. They also take exception to the landscape in the median on 99W. He said, especially in light of the current retail economy, they are very happy to be here. He added that they'd like to have a decision tonight. Mark Butorac with Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 6210 SW Alder St., Suite 700, Portland, summarized offsite improvements decided upon in the past. They will work with council on a reimbursement due to "past sins". Regarding the landscaping—he noted their proposal would be to put a financial cap of$50,000 for the landscape median. He said that's within reason for an adequate landscaping. It would be aesthetically pleasing with a cap of 50K. PLANNING COMMISSION MEE'1'ING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 2 of 8 He said he wanted to bring into the record official exhibits so that everyone is on the same page (Exhibit D). Hal Beighley of Beighley and Associates, 12840 NW Cornell,Portland, first spoke about condition number 3. He believes the tree size should be 2 1/2" rather than 3 1/2" caliper trees along the parking lot edge and gave the reasons why. He spoke about the differences in canopy coverage at 10, 20, & 30 years. He said they'd met with the tree committee in January. Kenneth Grimes, representing Pac Trust, discussed the Target building and some of the low impact development items in the program. He spoke about "green roofs." He said they are extremely expensive. He spoke about solar options. He read a statement that was presented in March by the national president of the American Institute of Architects: "Target Corporation received an AIA Presidential Citation in recognition of its excellent work in elevating the importance of design to the public." He noted that Target is really thought of as a premier retailer. He went through other low impact development items and examples. Matt Oyen,representing Pac Trust, in conjunction with Tanner Creek Engineering, and Energy Trust of Oregon — said the biggest impacts they have from their side is the tax liability where they're not able to fully utilize the 30% federal tax credit or the 50% Betsy [Business Energy Tax Credit (BETC / `Betsy"]. What they have is a 45% tax liability due to their partnership. He went on to talk about a spreadsheet he had for a 16 panel system. He went through it line by line. He spoke about tax credits and energy savings. Eric Sporre came back up and summarized: Condition 1 — canopy should be 30% not 50%. Condition 3 —2 '/2 inch vs 3 1/2 Condition 10 —put a cap at$50,000. Condition 17 - contingent upon getting a reimbursement district Condition 18 —reference exhibits (Exhibit D) They went back and added Condition 13— frequency of reporting from the project arborist. They would like their arborist to have to go out only every two weeks during a site work construction in the vicinity of impacted trees. [There was some discussion as to it simply stating "or by arrangement with the Project Arborist and the City Forester."] COMMISSIONERS QUESTIONS OF APPLICANT & STAFF With regard to seeking a 50K cap on the landscaping on the median - What do we get for 50K? Traditionally we put in low ground cover, small trees in a bark type treatment versus more ornamental type features such as metals or bricks and such. That's where the cost escalates. It'd be similar to what, in layman's terms, you believe is low vegetation landscaping. $5.00 per sq ft is what we're estimating. That includes irrigation. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 3 of 8 Staff— what is your take on that?(Kim McMillan answered): I don't think 50K would cover it. We need street trees, low maintenance shrubs, clustering with lower level... I think we would like to work together for something reasonable. I don't have a figure that I can put to that. Eric Sporre said they don't have more money to throw at it. They believe 50K is reasonable. They have no frontage on Hwy 99W. Kim McMillan suggested a reasonable approach. Put infrastructure. (Put just trees and let others put in bushes, etc.) They all agreed that was reasonable. Why do we need a median?Marc Butorac answered: A raised median is an ODOT requirement to prevent left turn movement. When does the signal on 72nd go in? McMillan answered that it goes in with this project. It's up to how they structure their construction schedule. PUBLIC TESTIMONY - IN FAVOR None PUBLIC TESTIMONY— IN OPPOSITION None APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL None needed PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 9:00 PM DELIBERATION President Inman summarized the list of conditions of approval that she believed were what they all had tentatively agreed upon: ® Revision to condition of approval No. 1 to revise: the parking lot canopy coverage from 50% to 30%. ® Revision to condition of approval No. 4 —the condition will now read: "Prior to issuance of any site/building permit, the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan showing all required parking lot and street trees at 3 '/z 2 h inch caliper. [Remove the wording that had included "and spaced no greater than 28' apart.] They have to come back for a variance. ® Revision to condition of approval No. 10 to insert: The applicant shall revise their plan to incorporate landscaping and irrigation along the entirety of the raised medians. Landscaping is to include the installation of proper soil and street trees at the equivalent separation of one tree every 28 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 4 of 8 ® Revision to condition of approval No. 13 to insert: "the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Forester, at least, once every two weeks, or as by arrangement with the Project Arborist and the City Arborist." o Revision to condition of approval No. 17 to insert:The applicant shall extend the two lane storage on the northbound off ramp from 100 ft to 650 ft of two lane storage (550 additional feet of two lane storage including 160 ft taper) contingent upon succesiul adoption of a reimbursement district. This improvement can be provided within the existing right of way. ® Revision to condition of approval No. 18: (-- - - -: : - : . . : • : . ) will read (refer to exhibits--offsite transportation improvements-Exhibit D). e New condition of approval: The applicant shall incorporate safety measures to address the defensible space issues raised in the City of Tigard Police Department comment letter dated May 15, 2009(Exhibit A). President Inman thanked the applicant for working so diligently and doing so well in addressing the commission's concerns. One of the commissioners asked about a possible timeline for the store being built. The applicant said it would most likely be done in the summer of 2011. MOTION: 9:06 PM The motion: "To approve PDR2008-00001 Tigard Retail Center as stipulated and with the amended stipulations provided and recited just prior, and with the findings derived from the hearing tonight" was made by Commissioner Muldoon, seconded by Commissioner Cattail. The motion passed unanimously on a recorded vote as follows: AYES: Commissioner Anderson, Commissioner Cattail, Commissioner Doherty, Commissioner Fishel, Commissioner Inman, Commissioner Muldoon and Commissioner Walsh (7) NAYS: None (0) ABSTAINERS: None (0) ABSENT: Commissioner Hasman and Commissioner Vermilyea (2) 5.2 Downtown Collector Street Standards—CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 9:08 PM STAFF REPORT Associate Planner, Cheryl Gaines, gave the staff report on behalf of the City. [Staff reports are available for review one week before scheduled public hearings.] Caines said the proposal is a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 5 of 8 Comprehensive Plan, (Policy 12.1.2c), which is Transportation, Transportation System Plan, Chapter 8, regarding motor vehicles, the Tigard Development Code, Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards, and the Municipal Code Chapter 10, which is motor vehicle parking. Caines wanted to make one correction to the staff report proposal. It currently reads "The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District." The word "separate," before "bike lanes," was omitted. So the wording should actually be "and remove the requirement for separate bike lanes on collector streets..." Caines said she pointed out that clarification in that the proposal could be a little misleading in that they're not saying"no bicycle lanes at all" — they're just saying that what they want to do is look at either having separate bicycle lanes or having the bicycles share a lane with a wider vehicle traveling. So it would be a little bit wider—maybe 14 feet instead of the typical 12 feet. So they would accommodate different types of modes of traffic on the same lane. Also—the collectors in the downtown would have a lower posted speed. Gaines distributed an email dated May 18 (Exhibit E) from a transportation planner from Metro,John Mermin, who had a comment about the proposed amendment. She noted he's • in favor, and Metro's in favor, of the proposed vehicle parking on streets and also mostly okay with the removal of the bike lane requirement except for Main Street. On the bottom of the email are his comments and, on the top, Caine's response to him. Caines noted it's kind of ironic in that in our current Transportation System Plan, the Bicycle Master Plan calls for bike lanes on all the downtown collectors except Main Street. So we currently don't even have anything that would require them on Main Street. Therefore,we're not actually removing that requirement for Main Street. Until these plans are finalized,the proposed amendment will give flexibility when designing downtown streets. Caines noted that staff is recommending approval as proposed. QUESTIONS & COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS Why are we changing it? Is there a pending application... or...? Kim McMillan answered "The main reason we're changing it is because Burnham Street is a collector. Burnham will use TIF dollars as a collector. If it doesn't meet the standards of a collector,we can't use the TIF dollars. We need to do housekeeping to allow our collectors in the downtown to have parking. It serves several purposes. One is to clean up our design. When we design things, I believe we need to meet our standards. Main Street also has parking and it's a collector. We need to either change the standard to allow parking on a collector in the downtown, or re- designate those streets. And we don't want to re-designate those if we want to use certain funding mechanisms. Is there signage letting people know they're in a special area with bicycles,pedestrians, etc.? I'm not sure that's something we could consider- especially if we do the Main Street/Green Street—but as Cheryl pointed out, the ORS allows for several design options for bicycles to share the PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 6 of 8 a � road. One is its own bike lane separated from the roadway completely and you could stretch that to say Fanno Creek trail—to have a striped bike lane adjacent to travel lane and then to share the travel lane. And at the speeds we have downtown, you could go down to an 11 ft travel lane and share the lane safely. We're going to hopefully have wider lanes to do that. Burnham will also have an 18 foot sidewalk on each side,which is huge. (A travel lane for cars is 12'.) So we're going to have this 18 foot, what we call a multi-modal pedestrian path— so you can have the bicycles on that as well. So Burnham is well equipped to take care of bicycles and then Main Street—we are working with Metro. They help facilitate the funding — the federal grant. The second one say `Remove the requirement to construct bike lanes in accordance with the Bicycle Master Plan along collector streets."And so you're just dealing basically with those streets that are listed here? It's not thatyou're going to get rid of the bike lanes—you're just going to make them better. Is that what the idea is? I just don't want to send the message that they're getting rid of a bike master plan and that we're going to have everyone stay in our cars and get rid of our bikes. I think it's the idea that...from the way I understand you've got this written is that it would be up to the City Engineer to see how best bike lanes fit into the collector streets now that the collector streets have vehicles parked on them. Is that correct? Yes. PUBLIC TESTIMONY- IN FAVOR -none PUBLIC TESTIMONY— IN OPPOSITION - none APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL—N/A PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED @ 9:25 PM DELIBERATIONS—No further discussion MOTION Commissioner Caffall made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Doherty: "I move to make a final recommendation for approval [of CPA2009-00002/DCA2009- 00002—Downtown Collector Street Standards] to City Council." The motion passed unanimously on a recorded vote, the Commission voted as follows: AYES: Commissioner Anderson, Commissioner Caffall, Commissioner Doherty, Commissioner Fishel, Commissioner Inman, Commissioner Muldoon and Commissioner Walsh (7) NAYS: None (0) ABSTAINERS: None (0) ABSENT: Commissioner Hasman and Commissioner Vermilyea (2) PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 7 of 8 • President Inman noted that this would go to City Council on June 23rd. 6. OTHER BUSINESS — The Commissioners were reminded that the next meeting will be June 1st and will be a double workshop—a buildable lands presentation and an omnibus Code Amendment—a housekeeping item—both led by Darren Wyss. In addition, a meeting will be held June 166 (a Tuesday) and would be a combined meeting with Council. Consultants will give a presentation regarding the Neighborhood Trail Study Results.This meeting would be in lieu of the regularly scheduled second meeting of the month. 7. ADJOURNMENT President Inman adjourned the meeting at 9:30 p.m. ' o CI - . . • Doreen Laughlin,Planning Co . 's.ion Secretary ATTEST: President Jodie Inman PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 8 of 8 a t Attachment 3 Che I Caines From: Cheryl Gaines Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:27 PM To: 'John Mermin' Cc: Ron Bunch; Mike McCarthy Subject: RE: Comments on Tigard TSP/Comp plan/code amendments Hi John, Thank you for your comments. I've discussed your concern about the removal of a bike lane requirement along Main Street with our Director and Transportation Engineer. Our current TSP(Bicycle Master Plan) does not require bike lanes along Main Street and the Regional Transportation Plan does not consider these streets regionally significant. At the same time we understand the importance of bike connections to the Fanno Creek Trail, WES, and other public transportation from Main Street and share your concern about providing those connections. • Downtown streets will have lower speeds to accommodate shared lanes where separate bike lanes are not proposed. Along Main Street there are existing conditions such as buildings constructed near the ROW that may make it difficult to accommodate a separate bike lane. The purpose of this amendment is not to eliminate bike lanes along Main Street. We only hope to allow some flexibility when designing it. I know that the City is working with Metro regarding bike traffic on Main Street and will continue to do so as we move forward. Our goal is to design a street that accommodates a wide range of users. Thank you for taking the time to review the proposal. Your comments will be presented to the Planning Commission at tonight's hearing(May 18th). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Thank you, Cheryl Caines Associate Planner City of Tigard (503) 718-2437 From: John Mermin [mailto:John.Mermin @oregonmetro.gov] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 10:35 AM To: Cheryl Caines Cc: meg.fernekees @state.or.us Subject: Comments on Tigard TSP/Comp plan/code amendments Hi Cheryl, It was good to chat with you on the phone the other day. I reviewed the proposed amendments to the TSP Comp plan, Development Code and Municipal code. After discussing with our engineer, and some of my transportation and land use colleagues, we'd like to express our strong support for allowing parking on collectors in the downtown urban renewal district. However, we are concerned about the removal of the bike lane requirement for one of the downtown collectors, Main - Street, due to the high volumes (estimated 10,000 ADT), and the need to make current and future intermodal connections with Fanno Creek Trail, WES station, and possible future LRT station. We are okay with the removal of the bike lane requirement on the other downtown collectors. Thanks for your consideration of our comments. Let me know if you have any questions. John Mermin 1 y 1. Associate Transportation Planner Planning Metro 503 797-1747 John.Mermin @oregonmetro.gov www.oregonmetro.gov Metro I People places. Open spaces 2 4 Attachment 4 Cheryl Caines From: Dick Bewersdorff Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:13 AM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: FW: Amendment to the TSP Did you see this? From: Hal Ballard [mailto:bicyclist @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 11:17 AM To: Dick Bewersdorff Subject: Amendment to the TSP Dear Dick, I've been asked to comment on the Planning Commission's agenda item 5.2 being heard tonight. Prior commitments prevent my appearance, so I hope these comments suffice. I hold to the tenet that "bicyclists fare best when they act and are treated as drivers of vehicles," as such, every travel lane for motor vehicles is a travel lane for cyclists. While they may make sense from a legal standpoint, it may not from a practical one (riding in the left lane on Hwy 99 near Hall Blvd. for example). I, nor the WashCo BTC, have no real objections to this amendment, provided that, even with on street parking, the lanes are made wide enough (14' or more) so bikes and cars can safely share the lane and bicyclists can avoid the dreaded "door zone." (that 3-4' suddenly occupied when a car door is opened) I would also ask that the speed limit in the proposed area be maintained or reduced to 25 MPH as is most downtown traffic in other cities. The average speed of cyclists is around 12 MPH which, compared to vehicular speeds means a difference of about 12 MPH, which would provide enough reaction time by either party to take the actions necessary to prevent a collision. Respectfully submitted, 1-f aL 3c Uard/ Executive DirectorM/ashCo BTC http://washcobtc.orq 503.984.1761 League Cycling Instructor 815/League of American Bicyclists www.bikeleaque.orq Transportation Solutions byCycle %ride my bicycle to ride my bicycle"-Zen proverb 1 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: The following will be considered by the Tigard City Council on Tuesday June Q 23,2009 at 7:30 PM at the Tigard Civic C Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon. Public oral or written testimony is T I GA RD invited. The public hearing on this matter will be held under Title 18 and rules of procedure adopted by the COM/AUNITY procedure r Council and available 9 at City Hall or e the rules of rocedure set forth in Section 18.390.060.E. The SPAl'E1�S Council will receive the Planning Commission's menda- tion and hold a public hearing on the request prior or to to making a decision. 6605 SE Lake Road, Portland, OR 97222•PO Box 22109 Portland OR 97269-2109 Further information may be obtained from the City of Tigard Phone:503-684-0360 Fax: 503-620-3433 Planning Division (Staff contact: Cheryl Caines, Associate E-mail: legals @commnewspapers.com Planner)at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 or by calling 503-639-4171. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS (CPA)2009-00002/ I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT depose and say that I am the Accounting (DCA)2009-00002 Manager of The Times(serving Tigard, -DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS- Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of general circulation, published at Beaverton, REQUEST: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and in the aforesaid county and state, as defined Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that Plan (Policy 8.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8-10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 City of Tigard Street and Utility Improvement Standards),and the Municipal Notice of Public Hearing/CPA2009-00002 Code (10.28.130 — Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed TT11314 amendments will allow vehicle parking on SW Main and SW Bumham Streets and remove the requirement for A copy of which is hereto annexed, was separate bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown py Urban Renewal District. LOCATION: The Downtown published in the entire issue of said Urban Renewal District. ZONES: CBD: Central Business newspaper for District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a 1 concentrated central business district, centered on the City's week in the following issue: historic downtown,including a mix of civic,retail and office June 4, 2009 uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/ acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted C,(wtoLwt outright.A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment,utilities,facilities with drive-up windows, Charlotte Allsop (Accounting Man ger) medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. MUR: Mixed Use Subscribed and sworn to before me this Residential Districts. The MUR zoning district is designed June 4, 2009. to apply to predominantly residential areas where mixed- uses are permitted when compatible with the residential use. A high density (MUR-1) and moderate density (MUR-2)r , , ,�M�� designation is available within the MUR zoning district. C- l� � G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is NOTAR`pPUBLIC FOR OREGON designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and My commission expire5N-1 .It f� i civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. 1/43 Except where non-conforming,residential uses are limited to Acct#10093001 single-family residences which are located on the same site Attn: Patty Lunsford as a permitted use.A wide range of uses, including but not City of Tigard OFI limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair 13125 SW Hall Blvd : ' SUZE and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical NOTARY E centers,ma or event entertainmen and gasoline stations,are Tigard, OR 97223 �'� COMMIS I g �r Mr COMMISSION EXPIRE permitted conditionally. C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed Size: 2x12 to accommodate civic and business/professional services Amount Due$200.40* and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail 'Please remit to address above and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. Within the Tigard Triangle and Bull Mountain Road District, residential uses at a minimum density of 32 units/net acre, i.e., equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted in conjunction with a commercial development. Heliports, medical centers, religious institutions and utilities are permitted conditionally. Developments in the C-P zoning district are intended to serve as a buffer between residential areas and more-intensive commercial and industrial areas. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.2(c) and Goal 15; and Statewide Planning Goals 1,and 12. Publish 06/04/2009. TT11314 ,II! ,r �. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes May 18,2009 1. CALL TO ORDER President Inman called the meeting to order at 7:07 PM. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center,Town Hall,at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL President Inman;Vice President Walsh; Commissioners Anderson, Cattail, Doherty, Fishel, Muldoon, and alternate Commissioner Gaschke Commissioners Absent: Commissioners Hasman and Vermilyea Staff Present: ' : - : - -, - : : -- - - - - : (amended on 6/1/09); Cheryl Gaines,Associate Planner; Gary Pagenstecher,Associate Planner;Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineering Manager; Doreen Laughlin,Planning Commission Secretary 3. COMMUNICATIONS—None. 4. CONSIDER MEETING MINUTES 5-4-09 Meeting Minutes: President Inman asked if there were any corrections, deletions, or additions to the minutes. There was one amendment. The amendment was that V.P.Walsh opened the 5-4-09 meeting, not President Inman. All agreed to the amendment and President Inman declared the minutes approved as amended. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 Tigard Retail Center—PDR2008-00001 PUBLIC HEARING OPENED President Inman opened the hearing and read the required statements and procedural items from the quasi-judicial hearing guide. When the commission was asked whether there were any ex parte contacts or site visits, Commissioner Muldoon noted that he'd made a site visit and had asked general questions without specific application to Energy Trust of Oregon and Oregon Department of Energy—both without project specificity. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 1 of 8 No one in the audience wished to challenge the jurisdiction of the commission. No conflicts of interest. STAFF REPORT Associate Planner, Gary Pagenstecher, distributed a memo from Officer Jim Wolf, of the Tigard Police Dept., commenting on Tigard Retail Center (Target) and lack of defensible space (Exhibit A). He also distributed an email from Commissioner Muldoon and an article from the Oregonian (Exhibit B). He then gave the staff report on behalf of the City. [Staff reports are available for review one week before scheduled public hearings.] Pagenstecher briefly reviewed the direction given to the applicant at the earlier hearing. QUESTIONS & COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS Can we waive the dock requirement?The requirement is for a loading space, not a dock, so it • doesn't necessarily mean the building has to incorporate a dock area. To address your specific question, the standard requirement-loading"space" - for a building 10,000 sq ft or larger - can be achieved in the parking field adjacent to the building with a space that's large enough. APPLICANTS PRESENTATION Eric Sporre—Vice President with Pac Trust, distributed a packet for the Commissioners to refer to while they were giving their presentation (Exhibit C). He said he was assuming that no one wanted to hear the history of the site and that they'd move forward. No one objected. He noted that they'd been there last on December 1st and there were a series of questions that they'd spent a considerable amount of time researching the answers to. He said Marc Butorac with Kittelson would be here to discuss traffic. Hal Beighley of Beighley and Associates will discuss landscape. Ken Grimes will touch on design and sustainability issues. He noted they'd received the staff report a week earlier and that they take exception to a number of things in the report. First and foremost is the 50% tree canopy. He said that goes far beyond what the direction of the Planning Commission was. It goes way beyond any code requirements and any recent land use decisions. It's just not feasible and far too costly. They also take exception to the landscape in the median on 99W. He said, especially in light of the current retail economy, they are very happy to be here. He added that they'd like to have a decision tonight. Mark Butorac with Kittelson&Associates, Inc. 6210 SW Alder St., Suite 700, Portland, summarized offsite improvements decided upon in the past. They will work with council on a reimbursement due to "past sins". Regarding the landscaping—he noted their proposal would be to put a financial cap of$50,000 for the landscape median. He said that's within reason for an adequate landscaping. It would be aesthetically pleasing with a cap of 50K. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 2 of 8 He said he wanted to bring into the record official exhibits so that everyone is on the same page (Exhibit D). Hal Beighley of Beighley and Associates, 12840 NW Cornell,Portland, first spoke about condition number 3. He believes the tree size should be 2 1/2"rather than 3 1/2" caliper trees along the parking lot edge and gave the reasons why. He spoke about the differences in canopy coverage at 10, 20, & 30 years. He said they'd met with the tree committee in January. Kenneth Grimes,representing Pac Trust, discussed the Target building and some of the low impact development items in the program. He spoke about"green roofs." He said they are extremely expensive. He spoke about solar options. He read a statement that was presented in March by the national president of the American Institute of Architects: "Target Corporation received an AIA Presidential Citation in recognition of its excellent work in elevating the importance of design to the public." He noted that Target is really thought of as a premier retailer. He went through other low impact development items and examples. Matt Oyen, representing Pac Trust, in conjunction with Tanner Creek Engineering, and Energy Trust of Oregon— said the biggest impacts they have from their side is the tax liability where they're not able to fully utilize the 30% federal tax credit or the 50% Betsy [Business Energy Tax Credit (BETC / `Betsy"]. What they have is a 45% tax liability due to their partnership. He went on to talk about a spreadsheet he had for a 16 panel system. He went through it line by line. He spoke about tax credits and energy savings. Eric Sporre came back up and summarized: Condition 1 — canopy should be 30% not 50%. Condition 3—2 '/2 inch vs 3 1/2 Condition 10—put a cap at$50,000. Condition 17 —contingent upon getting a reimbursement district Condition 18 —reference exhibits (Exhibit D) They went back and added Condition 13— frequency of reporting from the project arborist. They would like their arborist to have to go out only every two weeks during a site work construction in the vicinity of impacted trees. [There was some discussion as to it simply stating "or by arrangement with the Project Arborist and the City Forester."] COMMISSIONERS QUESTIONS OF APPLICANT & STAFF With regard to seeking a 50K cap on the/andscaping on the median - What do wegetfor 50K? Traditionally we put in low ground cover, small trees in a bark type treatment versus more ornamental type features such as metals or bricks and such. That's where the cost escalates. It'd be similar to what, in layman's terms,you believe is low vegetation landscaping. $5.00 per sq ft is what we're estimating. That includes irrigation. PLANNING COMMISSION MLr'I1NG MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 3 of 8 Staff—what is your take on that?(Kim McMillan answered): I don't think 50K would cover it. We need street trees, low maintenance shrubs, clustering with lower level... I think we would like to work together for something reasonable. I don't have a figure that I can put to that. Eric Sporre said they don't have more money to throw at it. They believe 50K is reasonable. They have no frontage on Hwy 99W. Kim McMillan suggested a reasonable approach. Put infrastructure. (Put just trees and let others put in bushes, etc.) They all agreed that was reasonable. 1Vhy do we need a median?Marc Butorac answered: A raised median is an ODOT requirement to prevent left turn movement. When does the signal on 72nd go in? McMillan answered that it goes in with this project. It's up to how they structure their construction schedule. PUBLIC TESTIMONY - IN FAVOR None PUBLIC TESTIMONY—IN OPPOSITION None APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL None needed PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 9:00 PM DELIBERATION President Inman summarized the list of conditions of approval that she believed were what they all had tentatively agreed upon: • Revision to condition of approval No. 1 to revise: the parking lot canopy coverage from 50% to 30%. • Revision to condition of approval No. 4—the condition will now read: "Prior to issuance of any site/building permit, the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan showing all required parking lot and street trees at 2 1 inch caliper. [Remove the wording that had included "and spaced no greater than 28' apart.] They have to come back for a variance. • Revision to condition of approval No. 10 to insert: The applicant shall revise their plan to incorporate landscaping and irrigation along the entirety of the raised medians. Landscaping is to include the installation of proper soil and street trees at the equivalent separation of one tree every 28 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 4 of 8 • Revision to condition of approval No. 13 to insert: "the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Forester, at least, once every two weeks, or as by arrangement with the Project Arborist and the City Arborist." • Revision to condition of approval No. 17 to insert:The applicant shall extend the two lane storage on the northbound off ramp from 100 ft to 650 ft of two lane storage (550 additional feet of two lane storage including 160 ft taper) contingent upon successful adoption of a reimbursement district. This improvement can be provided within the existing right of way. • Revision to condition of approval No. 18: (-- - : . . : . ) will read (refer to exhibits-- offsite transportation improvements-Exhibit D). • New condition of approval: The applicant shall incorporate safety measures to address the defensible space issues raised in the City of Tigard Police Department comment letter dated May 15, 2009(Exhibit A). President Inman thanked the applicant for working so diligently and doing so well in addressing the commission's concerns. One of the commissioners asked about a possible timeline for the store being built. The applicant said it would most likely be done in the summer of 2011. MOTION: 9:06 PM The motion: "To approve PDR2008-00001 Tigard Retail Center as stipulated and with the amended stipulations provided and recited just prior, and with the findings derived from the hearing tonight"was made by Commissioner Muldoon, seconded by Commissioner Caffall. The motion passed unanimously on a recorded vote as follows: AYES: Commissioner Anderson, Commissioner Caffall, Commissioner Doherty, Commissioner Fishel, Commissioner Inman, Commissioner Muldoon and Commissioner Walsh (7) NAYS: None (0) ABSTAINERS: None (0) ABSENT: Commissioner Hasman and Commissioner Vermilyea (2) 0 Downtown Collector Street Standards —CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 9:08 PM STAFF REPORT Associate Planner, Cheryl Caines, gave the staff report on behalf of the City. [Staff reports are available for review one week before scheduled public hearings.] Caines said the proposal is a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 5 of 8 Comprehensive Plan, (Policy 12.1.2c),which is Transportation,Transportation System Plan, Chapter 8, regarding motor vehicles, the Tigard Development Code, Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards, and the Municipal Code Chapter 10,which is motor vehicle parking. Caines wanted to make one correction to the staff report proposal. It currently reads "The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District." The word "separate," before "bike lanes," was omitted. So the wording should actually be "and remove the requirement for separate bike lanes on collector streets..." Caines said she pointed out that clarification in that the proposal could be a little misleading in that they're not saying"no bicycle lanes at all"— they're just saying that what they want to do is look at either having separate bicycle lanes or having the bicycles share a lane with a wider vehicle traveling. So it would be a little bit wider—maybe 14 feet instead of the typical 12 feet. So they would accommodate different types of modes of traffic on the same lane. Also— the collectors in the downtown would have a lower posted speed. Caines distributed an email dated May 18 (Exhibit E) from a transportation planner from Metro,John Mermin,who had a comment about the proposed amendment. She noted he's in favor, and Metro's in favor, of the proposed vehicle parking on streets and also mostly okay with the removal of the bike lane requirement except for Main Street. On the bottom of the email are his comments and, on the top, Caine's response to him. Gaines noted it's kind of ironic in that in our current Transportation System Plan, the Bicycle Master Plan calls for bike lanes on all the downtown collectors except Main Street. So we currently don't even have anything that would require them on Main Street.Therefore,we're not actually removing that requirement for Main Street. Until these plans are finalized, the proposed amendment will give flexibility when designing downtown streets. Gaines noted that staff is recommending approval as proposed. QUESTIONS & COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS W/4y are we changing it? Is there a pending application... or...? Kim McMillan answered "The main reason we're changing it is because Burnham Street is a collector. Burnham will use TIF dollars as a collector. If it doesn't meet the standards of a collector,we can't use the TIF dollars. We need to do housekeeping to allow our collectors in the downtown to have parking. It serves several purposes. One is to clean up our design. When we design things, I believe we need to meet our standards. Main Street also has parking and it's a collector. We need to either change the standard to allow parking on a collector in the downtown, or re- designate those streets. And we don't want to re-designate those if we want to use certain funding mechanisms. Is there signage letting people know they're in a special area with bicycles,pedestrians, etc..? I'm not sure that's something we could consider - especially if we do the Main Street/Green Street—but as Cheryl pointed out, the ORS allows for several design options for bicycles to share the PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 6 of 8 • c• road. One is its own bike lane separated from the roadway completely and you could stretch that to say Fanno Creek trail—to have a striped bike lane adjacent to travel lane and then to share the travel lane. And at the speeds we have downtown,you could go down to an 11 ft travel lane and share the lane safely. We're going to hopefully have wider lanes to do that. Burnham will also have an 18 foot sidewalk on each side,which is huge. (A travel lane for cars is 12'.) So we're going to have this 18 foot,what we call a multi-modal pedestrian path— so you can have the bicycles on that as well. So Burnham is well equipped to take care of bicycles and then Main Street—we are working with Metro. They help facilitate the funding —the federal grant. The second one say `Remove the requirement to construct bike lanes in accordance with the Bicycle Master Plan along collector streets"And so you're just dealing basically with those streets that are listed here? It's not that you're going to get rid of the bike lanes—you're just going to make them better. Is that what the idea is? I just don't want to send the message that they're getting rid of a bike master plan and that we're going to have everyone stay in our cars and get rid of our bikes. I think it's the idea that...from the way I understand you've got this written is that it would be up to the City Engineer to see how best bike lanes fit into the collector streets now that the collector streets have vehicles parked on them. Is that correct? Yes. PUBLIC TESTIMONY- IN FAVOR -none PUBLIC TESTIMONY—IN OPPOSITION - none APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL—N/A PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED @ 9:25 PM DELIBERATIONS—No further discussion MOTION Commissioner Caffall made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Doherty: "I move to make a final recommendation for approval [of CPA2009-00002/DCA2009- 00002—Downtown Collector Street Standards] to City Council." The motion passed unanimously on a recorded vote, the Commission voted as follows: AYES: Commissioner Anderson, Commissioner Caffall, Commissioner Doherty, Commissioner Fishel, Commissioner Inman, Commissioner Muldoon and Commissioner Walsh (7) NAYS: None (0) ABSTAINERS: None (0) ABSENT: Commissioner Hasman and Commissioner Vermilyea (2) PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 18,2009—Page 7 of 8 President Inman noted that this would go to City Council on June 23rd. 6. OTHER BUSINESS— The Commissioners were reminded that the next meeting will be June 1st and will be a double workshop—a buildable lands presentation and an omnibus Code Amendment—a housekeeping item—both led by Darren Wyss. In addition, a meeting will be held June 16th (a Tuesday) and would be a combined meeting with Council. Consultants will give a presentation regarding the Neighborhood Trail Study Results.This meeting would be in lieu of the regularly scheduled second meeting of the month. 7. ADJOURNMENT President Inman adjourned the meeting at 9:30 p.m. • C f , I io �i , Doreen Laughlin,Planning Co 's.ion Secretary Its A'1TEST: President Jodie Inman PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES-May 18,2009—Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT E Cheryl Caines From: Cheryl Caines Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:27 PM To: 'John Mermin' Cc: Ron Bunch; Mike McCarthy Subject: RE: Comments on Tigard TSP/Comp plan/code amendments Hi John, Thank you for your comments. I've discussed your concern about the removal of a bike lane requirement along Main Street with our Director and Transportation Engineer. Our current TSP(Bicycle Master Plan) does not require bike lanes along Main Street and the Regional Transportation Plan does not consider these streets regionally significant. At the same time we understand the Importance of bike connections to the Fanno Creek Trail,WES,and other public transportation from Main Street and share your concern about providing those connections. Downtown streets will have lower speeds to accommodate shared lanes where separate bike lanes are not proposed. Along Main Street there are existing conditions such as buildings constructed near the ROW that may make it difficult to accommodate a separate bike lane, the purpose of this amendment is not to eliminate bike lanes along Main Street. We only hope to allow some flexibility when designing it. I know that the City is working with Metro regarding bike trafficon Main Street and will continue to do so as we move forward. Our goal is to design a street that accommodates a wide range of users. Thank you for taking the time to review the proposal. Your comments will be presented to the Planning Commission at tonight's hearing(May ), If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Thank you, Cheryl Caines Associate Planner City of Tigard (503)718-2437 From: John Mermin [mailto:John.Mermin @oregonmetro.gov] Sent: Friday, May 15,2009 10:35 AM To: Cheryl Caines Cc: meg.fernekees @state.or.us Subject: Comments on Tigard TSP/Comp plan/code amendments Hi Cheryl, It was good to chat with you on the phone the other day. I reviewed the proposed amendments to the TSP Comp plan, Development Code and Municipal code. After discussing with our engineer, and some of my transportation and land use colleagues,we'd like to express our strong support for allowing parking on collectors in the downtown urban renewal district. However, we are concerned about the removal of the bike lane requirement for one of the downtown collectors, Main Street, due to the high volumes(estimated 10,000 ADT), and the need to make current and future intermodal connections with Fanno Creek Trail,WES station, and possible future LRT station. We are okay with the removal of the bike lane requirement on the other downtown collectors. Thanks for your consideration of our comments. Let me know if you have any questions. John Mermin 1 City of Tigard TIGARD Planning Commission — Agenda MEETING DATE: May 18, 2009, 7:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard —Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL 7:00 p.m. 3. COMMUNICATIONS 7:02 p.m. 4. CONSIDER MINUTES 7:05 p.m. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:10 p.m. 5.1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2008-00001 -TIGARD RETAIL CENTER REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Planned Development Review approval for concurrent review of a Planned Development concept plan and detailed development plan (PDR2008-00001) for development of an 18.16-acre vacant property with a proposed 137,900 square foot Target retail building and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings. In addition, there will be surface parking, landscaping, lighting, access and utility infrastructure improvements. The Concept and Detailed Plans are being reviewed separately by the Planning Commission with a separate decision on each plan at successive hearings. The Planning Commission approved the Concept Plan at its December 1, 2008 meeting and will be addressing the Detailed Plan at its May 18, 2009 meeting. LOCATION: The property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street, west of SW 72"d Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map (WCTM) 1S136CD, Tax Lot 04200, WCTM 2S101BA, Tax Lot 00101, and WCTM 2S101AB Tax Lot 01400. ZONE: C-G (PD) General Commercial District with Planned Development Overlay. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2009-00002/DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (DCA) 2009-00002- DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS 8:10pm PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA— MAY 18, 2009 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2 REQUEST: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 12.1.2.c),Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8-10),Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130—Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking on SW Main and SW Burnham Streets and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. LOCATION: The Downtown Urban Renewal District. ZONES: CBD: Central Business District. ; and MUR-1: Mixed-Use High-Density Residential. The MUR-1 zoning district is designed to apply to predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted when compatible with the residential use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) and Goal 15; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, and 12. 6. OTHER BUSINESS 9:10 p.m. 7. ADJOURNMENT 9:15 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA— MAY 18, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item: 5.2 Hearing Date: May 18.2009 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TIGAItI), OREGON TVmuD.t SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE NAME: DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS AMENDMENT CASE NOS.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) CPA2009-00002 Development Code Amendment (DCA) DCA2009-00002 PROPOSAL: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 12.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8- 10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130 — Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 ZONES: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density- of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment,utilities, facilities with drive-up windows,medical centers,major event entertainment and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. MUR: Mixed Use Residential Districts. The MUR zoning district is designed to apply to predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted when compatible with the residential use. A high density (MUR-1) and moderate density (MUR-2) designation is available within the MUR zoning district. C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single- family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. Within the Tigard Triangle and Bull Mountain Road District, residential uses at a minimum density of STAFF REPORT TO T1-1li.MANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGIF,1 01'6 DOWNTOWN Co1,1,1',CI'oR SIRI':I';1'STANDARDS conjunction with a commercial development. Heliports medical centers, religious institutions and utilities are permitted conditionally. Developments in the C-P zoning district are intended to serve as a buffer between residential-areas and more-intensive commercial and industrial areas. LOCATION: Downtown Urban Renewal District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) and Goal 15;and Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 12. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find in favor to amend the Tigard Development Code 18.810, Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2, Transportation System Plan Chapter 8 and Municipal Code Title 10 as proposed with any alterations as determined through the public hearing process and make a final recommendation to the Tigard City Council. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The proposal is to amend the street standards for collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. There are four collectors within the downtown (Main,Burnham and Scoffins Streets and Ash Avenue - Exhibit A. The current standard for collector streets does not permit on-street parking and requires bicycle lanes on all collector streets within the city. The proposed amendments will allow on-street parking along collectors within the downtown. In addition, the construction of designated bicycle lanes may not be required for all collectors within the downtown. The requirement for separate bike lanes would be determined by the City Engineer. This proposal allows flexibility in downtown street design until permanent standards can be adopted and allows on-street parking,which already exists along Main Street. PROPOSED CHANGES The proposed changes are as follows (Exhibit B): 1. Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards • Table 18.810.1,Figure 18.810.2., and ; • Section 18.810.110 These changes will allow vehicle parking along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District and allow bike lane requirements to be determined by the City Engineer for the same downtown collectors. 2. Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.2(c) - remove the requirement to construct bike lanes in accordance with the Bicycle Master Plan along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. 3. Transportation System Plan Chapter 8 Motor Vehicles, Figure 8-10 (Arterial and Collector Sample Street Cross Sections) - the criteria within the chart regarding On Street Parking is being modified to allow exceptions. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 2 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS 4. Tigard Municipal Code 10.28.130 - Remove the parking restriction for the north side of Burnham Street near the intersection with Hall Boulevard (Restriction #65). This is necessary because Burnham Street has been designed to allow parking in this area. All other Municipal Code parking restrictions on downtown collectors found in the Municipal Code will remain in effect. SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA Chapter 18.380 states that legislative text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060G. Chapter 18.390.060G states that the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors: 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; Forty-five day advance notice was provided to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) on April 2, 2009, more than 45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing as required. In addition, the Tigard Development Code (TCD) and Comprehensive Plan have been acknowledged by DLCD. The following are the applicable Statewide Planning Goals that are applicable to this proposal: 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; Statewide Planning Goal 1- Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and for changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. This goal has been met by complying with the Tigard Development Code notice requirements set forth in Chapter 18.390. Notice has been published in the Tigard Times Newspaper prior to the public hearing. In addition a notice was posted on the City website. Statewide Planning Goal 12 - Transportation This goal outlines provisions to insure a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. Transportation plans must consider all modes of transportation, meet local, regional, and state transportation needs and plan requirements, conserve energy, and facilitate the flow of goods and services. The proposed amendment will affect bicycle users by accommodating bicycle traffic in designated lanes or wider vehicle travel lanes. 3. Any applicable METRO regulations; There are no applicable Metro regulations under the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. The 2004 Regional Transportation Plan addresses street design from a region-wide perspective. The collector streets affected by this amendment are not considered regionally significant;therefore, the regional street design standards do not apply. 4. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 3 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT Goal 1.1 Provide citizens, affected agencies and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2 The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. Goal 1.2 Ensure all citizens have access to: A. opportunities to communicate directly to the City; and B. information on issues in an understandable form. Policy 1. The City shall ensure pertinent information is readily accessible to the community and presented in such a manner that even technical information is easy to understand. Policy 2. The City shall utilize such communication methods as mailings, posters, newsletters, the internet, and any other available media to promote citizen involvement and continue to evaluate the effectiveness of methods used. Policy 6. The City shall provide opportunities for citizens to communicate to Council, boards and commissions, and staff regarding issues that concern them. The City has published notice of the hearing and posted the site pursuant to TDC 18.390.050 for Type IV Procedures. In addition, a copy of the hearing notice was posted on the City website. Public hearings will be held before the Planning Commission and City Council. With these public involvement provisions this application is consistent with applicable Citizen Involvement policies. TRANSPORTATION Goal 12.1 Transportation System Policy 2 (A) Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of transportation (including motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, transit and other modes) by: The development of and implementation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility, pedestrian, bicycle, transit, truck and auto use. The proposed collector street standards will still accommodate multiple modes of traffic. Sidewalks are provided for pedestrians. Bicycles lanes or wider vehicle travel lanes are required to accommodate bicyclists. Policy 2 (C) Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master. All schools, parks, public facilities, and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. The policy requires bike lanes on all collectors consistent with the bicycle master plan. The Bicycle Master Plan (Figure 6-2) shows proposed bike lanes on Burnham Street, Scoffins Street, and Ash Avenue. Lanes are not shown on Main Street. As proposed, the amendment will allow streets to be designed with or without designated bike lanes within the downtown. Bicycles will still be accommodated by wider vehicle travel lanes • STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 4 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS where bike lanes were not provided (e.g. Burnham Street). In addition, some off-street bicycle circulation is currently provided by the Fanno Creek Trail that runs parallel to Burnham Street. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS - DOWNTOWN Goal 15.4 Develop comprehensive street and circulation improvements for pedestrians, automobiles, bicycles, and transit. Policy 1. The downtown shall be served by a complete array of multi-modal transportation services including auto, transit, bike, and pedestrian facilities. As proposed, the collector street standards will serve multiple modes of travel including autos, transit, bike, and pedestrians. The City is currently working on a circulation plan for the downtown that will improve connectivity and establish street standards for the downtown. In addition, the City is also undertaking a comprehensive review of the Transportation System Plan (TSP). The proposed amendments will allow flexible street standards for the downtown until more appropriate standards can be established. 5. Any applicable provision of the City's implementing ordinances. Code Section 18.380 Zoning Map and Text Amendments: This section regulates amendments. It outlines the process for reviewing Development Code Text Amendments. The present amendment will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in the chapter. This procedure requires public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Code Section 18.390 Decision-Making Procedures: This chapter establishes standard decision-making procedures for reviewing applications. The amendment under consideration will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as detailed in the chapter. Code Section 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards: This section of the code provides standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The amendment modifies the collector standards to allow on-street parking in the downtown, but also eliminates the requirement for designated bicycle lanes. The removal of this requirement does not mean that bike lanes will not be provided, but provides options and flexibility for downtown street design. SECTION V. STAFF ANALYSIS The current Comprehensive Plan (Transportaion Chapter), TSP, and Development Code street standards address collectors on a city-wide basis. Little consideration was given on how collectors might function in different areas of the city. In this case, downtown collectors serve not only as connectors between arterials such as Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard; they also transport users to a destination- Downtown Tigard. In addition to conveying traffic through the area and connecting to regional public transit available at the Tigard Transit Center, downtown collectors should also accommodate those wishing to spend time within the downtown by providing public parking options on the streets. On-street parking will be essential as the downtown redevelops to its intended dense form. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 5 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS Collector streets typically do not allow on-street parking due to the larger traffic volumes carried by collectors and the higher rates of speed which are permitted. In the downtown, the speeds will likely be lower than on a typical collector street and on-street parking also acts as a traffic calming device causing drivers to travel at lower speeds. Downtown streets are also likely to be designed differently and therefore, will function differently from other collectors within the city. The City is currently within Periodic Review and will be updating the TSP and Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, a circulation plan is also being prepared for the downtown. As noted above this plan will improve connectivity and establish street standards for the downtown. The amendments being proposed with this application could be further altered, eliminated or replaced in the future. Until those plans are finalized, the proposed changes will allow some flexibility in the design of collectors within the downtown and accommodate existing on-street parking along Main Street. SECTION VI. OTHER ALTERNATIVES No Action - The code would remain unchanged. Parking will not be permitted on any collector in the City. Designated bicycle lanes will be required on all collector streets throughout the City. Alternate Actions - Apply the amendment to specific downtown collector streets. The public already parks along portions of Main Street, Burnham Street and Ash Avenue. Burnham Street has been redesigned to accommodate on-street parking. SECTION VII. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF & OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department, Engineering Division, Public Works Department, Long Range Planning Division, and the Current Planning Code Enforcement Officer were given copies of the proposed code amendment. Only Code Enforcement and Police responded with no objections. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, Clean Water Services (CWS), Metro, ODOT Rail, and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) were notified of the proposed amendment. No written comments were received from most agencies. CWS responded with no concerns or objections to the proposed amendments, but did note that any improvements to upgrade streets to the new designations would require Storm Water Connection Permit approval. May 11, 2009 PREPARE BY: Cheryl Caines DATE Associate Planner 1 • APP.,- e`` May 11, 2009 APPROVE I :Y: Dick Bewers t orf DATE Planning Manager STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 PAGE 6 OF 6 DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS \ / EXHIBIT A v, - -_ Downtown Tigard Collector Streets May 7, 2009 tCT City of Tigard Oregon .......\ 414%, ; U _,.,,.: '.. �• r � . � r0ti ' .'}3 � 6G do 1 r IP,-: . �y 4yam . .9 n \ . Pia %�i� . e Pk ,, Ciry Hall Collector Designation Urban Renewal District r. i. \ —4—$— Railroad ■ __ Park 0 250 500 1,000 I I I ( , Feet . -...— f—N---1 EXHIBIT B CPA2009-00002 & DCA2009-00002 COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS AMENDMENT May 11, 2009 Explanation of Formatting These text amendments employ the following formatting: [Bold, Underline and Italic] —Text to be added Proposed code language is as follows: Chapter 18.810 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.810.030 Streets Figure 18.810.2 Collector Sample Cross Sections (Ord. 02-33) r _ .5' 6-8' 5.5' 6'Bike, 11' 11' 6'Bike,5.5' 6-8'..5 R/W 2 Lane 58'42'R/W • � _ _ f � 12'Median/ 5, 5 6-8' 5.5' 6'Bike 11' - Turn Lane , 11' 6'Bike,5.5'- .6-8' R/W.70'-74' 3 Lane 70'-74'R/W 5' 12'Median/ 5' 6-8 , 5.5' 6'Bike, 11' 11' . Turn Lane 1 1' . 11' ,6'Bike. 5.5' 6-8' RAN 92'--96' 5 Lane 92=96'R/W ParkinE is allowed on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. Bike lane requirements on these same collectors shall be determined by the City Engineer. Table 18.810.1 Minimum Widths for Street Characteristics cf) ` e a) C 4 Ar= .O L., ++ Cf , .. Type of Street w ,a .. o a.. ►.d .� + M. ' 3 b y eell �i y ea ''4 u �.- e=a �.TJ a el a .° 41 aa3 s iz a z ® rr� ,.a Arterial 64'-128' Varies 2 -7(Refer to 12' N/A 6' (New Streets) 8' (Res. &Ind. Zones) 5' 1241) TSP) 5'-6' (Existing Streets) 10' (Comm. Zones) Collector 58'-96' Varies 2-5 (Refer to 11' N/A 6' (New Streets)- 6' (Res. &Ind. Zones) 5' 124ww TSP) 8,X41 5'-6' (Existing Streets)L51 8' (Comm. Zones) Neighborhood Route 50'-58' 28'-36' 2 10' 8' 5'-6' 5'-642) 5' N/A Local: Industrial/Commercial 50' 36' 2 N/A 5'-6'(2) 5' N/A Local: Residential N/A • Under 1500 ADT 54'/50'3) 32'/28'3) 2 8' (both sides) N/A 5'-642) 5' • Under 500 ADT 50'/46'3) 28'/24'3 2 8' (one side) N/A • Under 200 ADT 46'/42'3) 24'/20'3) 2 (No Parking) N/A Cul-de-sac bulbs in 50' 42' radius N/A N/A N/A N/A Industrial and radius Commercial zones _ _ Cul-de-sac bulbs in 47' 40' radius N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Residential zones radius _ Alley: Residential 16' 16' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alley: Business 20' 20' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (Ord. 02-33) ' Medians required for 5 and 7 lane roadways. They are optional for 3 lane roadways. 2 Sidewalk widths for these streets shall be 5 ft with landscape strip; 6 ft if against curb(if permitted in accordance with 18.810.070.C). 3"Skinny Street"roadway widths are permitted where cross section and review criteria are met. Refer to corresponding cross sections (Figures 18.810.3, 18.810.4 and 18.810.5) for details and conditions. Parking is allowed on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. 5Bicycle lane requirements on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District shall be determined by the City Engineer. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all Arterial and Collector routes and where identified on the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan (TSP). Bike lane requirements alone collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District shall be determined bp the City Engineer. • • 4 Ed O�O - 4- TRANSPORTATION a policy or implementation strategy specifically conflicts with the updated TSP, the specific policy or implementation strategy has been deleted. Section 1: Transportation System KEY FINDINGS ® There are 22 intersections near or at capacity based on the 2001 Tigard Transportation System Plan. B There is no continuous bicycle network in Tigard. © There are significant gaps in the sidewalk system with few interconnected locations linking to schools, retail, parks, and transit. n Segments of Highway 217 and I-5 are over capacity and ORE 99W will continue to serve more through traffic in the future. ei Future traffic models indicate ORE 99W and half of the signalized traffic intersections fail within 20 years assuming no improvements are made. 13 Travel time data on Highway 217 indicates that some of the slowest travel speed on the facility occurs in Tigard due to existing capacity issues and the need for interchange improvements. B In the development of the transportation system plan, seven goals were identified which were used as the guidelines for the development of the policies and implementation strategies. The goals were: livability, balanced transportation system, safety,performance, accessibility,goods movement, and coordination. GOAL: 12.1 Transportation System POLICIES: 1. Plan, design, and construct transportation facilities in a manner which enhances the livability of Tigard by: A. Proper location and design of transportation facilities. 12-2 Ciry of Tigard I Comprehensive Plan TRANSPORTATION B. Encouraging pedestrian accessibility by providing safe, secure and desirable 4 SftCO iN egiNgi pedestrian routes. M % C. Addressing issues of excessive F p'edez_trvan speeding and through traffic on local aceesszb� i�ty residential streets through a neighbor , y; hood traffic program. The program by pro�v ;dang�;T should address corrective measures $ for existing problems and assure that Safe, secure development incorporates traffic - calming. ,r�nd'desirable 2. Provide a balanced transportation system, pedestrzan; incorporating all modes of transportation (including motor vehicle, bicycle,pedes- trian, transit and other modes) by: A. The development of and implemen- tation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility, pedestrian, bicycle, transit, truck and auto use. B. Coordination with TriMet,and/or any other transit providers serving Tigard, to improve transit service to Tigard. Fixed route transit will primarily use arterial and collector streets in Tigard. Development adjacent to transit routes will provide direct pedestrian accessibility. C. Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master plan, with the exception of collectors within the downtown urban renewal district.All schools, parks, public facilities, and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. D. Construction of sidewalks on all streets within Tigard. All schools, parks,public facilities,and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a sidewalk. E. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recre- ational trails. F Design local streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by providing connectivity and limiting out-of-direction travel and provide connectivity to activity centers and destinations with a priority for bicycle and pedestrian connections. G. Tigard will participate in vehicle trip reduction strategies developed Comprehensive Plan I City of Tigard 12-3 Associates • A CITY OF TIGARD Transportation 'q .,.' System POan lip '1'I _ "f 11� 5' 1 6' 16'Blke 1 12' I 12' 16'Bike l 6' I 5' 11� I R/W 60' I • 2 Lane 60'R/W `, ,,,,J ,, ■ 'ii .; 12'-14'Medla / 111 5' I 6' 16'Blke1 12'-13' I Turn Lone 12'-13' 16'Bike1 6' 1 5 111 R/W 74' I 3*Lane 74'R/W • • .W .Q .R ' ' /' r '1 , m.o. 14'Median 1 5' I 6' 16'Bike 1 12' 12' I Turn I ane'M I 12' I 12' 16'Bike I 6' I 5' Ili . 1 R/W 98' 5*Lane 98'RNV b .,cJ .R p# 4 p 12'MedianL 11 6' I 6' 16'Bike 1 12' I 12' 1 12' I Turn I one 1 12' I 12' I 12' (Bike 6'1 6' I 6' 11 II R/W 98' I 7*Lane 122'R/W • Criteria Vehicle Lane Widths: Truck Route= 12 ft. (minimum widths) Bus Route= 12 ft. 11 ft. (12 ft.Preferred) Collector 10-11 ft. On Street Parking: None(with few existing exceptions) • Bicycle Lanes: New Construction= 6 ft. (minimum widths) Reconstruction=5 to 6 ft. Sidewalks:(minimum width) 5-13 ft. Consider Curb Extensions • on Ped Routes Landscape Strips: Required Medians: 5/7 Lane=Required 3 Lane=Optional Neighborhood Traffic Only Under Special Conditions: - Mana e ment: Selected Measures Figure 8-10 * Note that sidewalk widths above 6 ft.may require additional right-of-way ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR Where appropriate,the median/lane may not be provided resulting in 2,4 and SAMPLE STREET CROSS SECTIONS 6 lane cross sections. The removal of the center turn lane must consider both v����s®���® ROW ROW 9•A®1 WIDTH a safety and pedestrian needs. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE terminus thereof; S.W. Genesis Loop, extending from the most southerly intersection thereof with S.W. 115th 49. Within the northerly half of S.W. Avenue easterly a distance of one hundred sixty- Walnut Place; also, within the southwest half of five feet; S.W. Walnut Place beginning at S.W. Pacific and, thence, extending a distance of one hundred 58. Along both sides of S.W. Durham Road seventy-five feet southeasterly along the curbline; between Hall Boulevard and Pacific Highway; 50. Within a portion of the right-of-way of 59. Repealed by Ord. 95-32; S.W. Hampton Street being all that portion thereof lying between S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. 66th 60. Within the west half of the right-of-way Avenue; of S.W. 92nd Avenue, beginning at the intersection thereof with the south right-of-way 51. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; line of S.W. Durham Road; thence, extending southerly one thousand four hundred fifty feet; 52. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; 61. Within the right-of-way of S.W. 92nd 53. Within the southeast half of the most Avenue, beginning at a point which lies one southerly end of S.W. Main Street, beginning at thousand four hundred fifty feet southerly of the the intersection of the southeast curblines of S.W. south right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road; Pacific Highway and S.W. Main Street and thence, extending southerly one thousand one extending seventy-five feet along the Main Street hundred ninety feet; excepting therefrom the south curbline to a point; also, therein, beginning at a six hundred eighty feet of the west half thereof; point on the Main Street curbline which lies two hundred five feet from said intersecting curblines 62. Along the east side of S.W. 85th Avenue and extending thirty feet therealong to a point; from Durham Road to a point four hundred fifty feet south of the south curbline of Durham Road; 54. Within the westerly half of the right-of- way of 115th Avenue extending from the 63. On S.W. Varns Street from S.W. 72nd intersection with S.W. Gaarde Street northerly to Avenue to a point one hundred twenty-five feet the intersection of S.W. Fonner Street; west of the west curbline of 72nd Avenue; 55. Within the northwesterly right-of-way 64. On S.W. Watkins Avenue from S.W. of S.W. McKenzie Street from a point twenty feet Pacific Highway to a point seventy-five feet west southeasterly from the intersection of the of the west curbline of Pacific Highway; centerlines at S.W. McKenzie St., and S.W. Grant St., to a point ninety feet southeasterly of the 65. Along the north side of S.W. Burnham centerline intersection; _ __ . . - . t:. _ . . . . .. • _. 56. On the northwesterly half of S.W. Ash ... • . . _. . . •. . _. . _ . Avenue beginning at the northeast right-of-way ; line of S.W. Commercial Street and extending thence northeasterly one hundred thirty-eight feet. 66. On S.W. 69th Avenue from Pacific Highway to a point one hundred fifty feet north of 57. Within the curblines on each side of the north curbline of Pacific Highway, measured 10-28-9 SE Update: 10/04 ESTIMONY SIGN-IN SHEF We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 minutes. If you are speaking on behalf of four or more persons, please state which group you're speaking on behalf of and you may request extra time. If extra time is granted, you will be limited to 20 minutes. Written comments are always appreciated by the Planning Commission to supplement oral testimony & are entered into the record. Please submit any written testimony to the Planning Commission Secretary (Doreen Laughlin). AGENDA ITEM NO.: 5.2 DATE: May 18, 2009 PAGE OF FILE NAME: I COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS CASE NOS.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA2009-00002 Development Code Amendment DCA2009-00002 IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY ON THE ITEM INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS— Please print clearly PROPONENT OF APPLICATION OPPONENT OF APPLICATION -(Speaking In Favor or Neutral)- -(Speaking Against)- - Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. 1 Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. r" , • • : COMMUNITY . - 1 • . ,. NEWSPAPERS 6605 SE Late Rood,Pooling,00 67222.PO Boa 22100 ParIlaad OR 072002100 . • Phone:503-984.0390Foa:5031203433 : PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: E-mail: Iegala@cammnewspapars.com • - - - AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TIGARD State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS , • _ The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, Commission on Monday May 18, 2009 at 7:00 PM at the depose and say that I am the Accounting Tigard Civic Center-Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,; Manager of The Times(serving Tigard, Oregon. Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of Public 'oral or written testimony is invited. The public • general circulation, published at Beaverton, hearing on this matter will be held under Title 18 and rules of, in the aforesaid county and state, as defined procedure adopted by the Council and available at City Hall on by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that the rules of procedure set forth in Section 18.390.060.E. The Planning Commission's review is for the purpose of making a recommendation to the City Council on the request. The City of Tigard Council will then hold a public hearing on the request prior to Notice of Public Hearing/CPA 2009-00002 making a decision.. TT11296 _Further information may obtained from_the'City of Tigard±, A copy of which is hereto annexed, was ' Planning Division (Staff contact: Cheryl Caines;Associate published in the entire issue of said Planner)at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223 or by calling 503-639-4171. newspaper for . 1 week in the following issue 1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.AMENDMENT April 30, 2009 (CPA)2009-00002/ DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT ' (DCA)2009-00002 ' . =DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS- , CYktt-1( �J�� REQUEST: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and �,� ZT� Development Code Amendment to amend the comprehensive Plan:(Policy 12.1.2.c), Transportation.System Plan (Chapter Charlotte.Allsop(Acco2ngManagr) 8, Figur e 8-10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the•Municipal Subscribed and sworn to before me this Code (10.28.130 Motor Vehicle Parking). The•proposed, April 30, 2009. amendments will allow vehicle parking on SW Main and SW. Burnham.Streets and remove the requirement for bike lanes on ` �C9���/1 I. collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District: LLOC ATION:The Downtown Urban Renewal District.ZONES: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is AR UBLIC FOR OREGON designed to provide a concentrated central business. district, My commission expiresa, �1/ I centered on the City's historic'downtown; including a mix of o`er civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing Acct#10093001 at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the Attn: Patty Lunsford ^����-�.__ -��-�-` R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum 0 i'�,.. OFFICIAL density of 32 units/acre,equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, • City of Tigard ( =l' SUZETTE a 1 are�lpermitted outright; and MUR-I: Mixed-Use High-Density 13125 SW Hall Blvd () �.�. NOTARY PUBIl(' Residential. The MUR-1 zoning district is designed to apply to Tigard, OR 97223 IJ L; 'i COMMISSION I predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted • ( MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV when compatible with the residential 'use. APPLICABLE �~`-`~-`-`� �~- REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Size: 2x 8.5 - Amount Due: $141.95 Chapters 18.380; 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Please remit to the address above. Policy 12.1.2(c)and Goal 15; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, I.and 12. . Publish 04/30/2009. . TT11296 r PLEASE POST ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: http://www.tigard-or.gov/city hall/departments/cd/code amendment.asp http://www.tigard-or.gov/city hall/departments/cd/code amendments/cpa2009-00002.asp hap://www.tigard-or.gov/communit),Icalendar/calendar.asp http://www.tigard-or.gov/city hall/public notices/default.asp http://www.tigard-or.gov/business/municipal code/title-18.asp PRIMARY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2009-00002 FILE NUMBER: Click here to see the proposed code changes Hearing Dates: Planning Commission: Monday, May 18, 2009, 7:00 PM City Council: Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 7:30 PM A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 8.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8-10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Proposal: Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130 - Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking on SW Main and SW Burnham Streets and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK TO THE APPLICATION SUMMARY BELOW FROM Click here to see the proposed code changes IN THE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION ABOVE (pg. 1). FILE NOS.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2009-00002 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (DCA) 2009-00002 FILE TITLE: DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS Comprehensive Plan (Policy 8.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, PROPOSED CODE Figure 8-10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility AMENDMENTS: Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130 - Motor Vehicle Parking). APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 8.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8-10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility REQUEST: Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130 - Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking on SW Main and SW Burnham Streets and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. LOCATION: The Downtown Urban Renewal District CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, ZONE: and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright; and MUR-1: Mixed-Use High-Density Residential. The MUR-1 zoning district is designed to apply to predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted when compatible with the residential use. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; REVIEW CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.2(c) and Goal 15; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, and 12. STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner cherylc @ tgard-or.gov or 503-718-2437 HEARING DATES: Planning Commission: Monday, May 18, 2009, 7:00 PM City Council: Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 7:30 PM REQUEST FOR COMMENTS <\ •l `. r i 1 DLCD Notice of P/Z, Proposed Amendment P.-* Pp THIS FORM MUST BE RECEIVED BY DLCD AT LEAST 45 DAYS PRIOR TO THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING i PER ORS 197.610,OAR CHAPTER 660,DIVISION 18 Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Local file number: CPA2009-00002 Date First Evidentiary hearing: May 18, 2009 Date of Final Hearing: June 23, 2009 Is this a revision to a previously submitted proposal? ❑Yes No Date submitted: ® Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ❑ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ® Land Use Regulation Amendment ❑ Zoning Map Amendment n New Land Use Regulation ❑ Other: Briefly Summarize Proposal. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached" (limit of 500 characters): Amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Transportation System Plan, and Tigard Development Code to allow vehicle parking on SW Main and Burnham Streets and eliminate bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. Has sufficient information been included to advise DLCD of the effect of proposal? Yes Plan map changed from: To: Zone map changed from: To: Location of property (do not use Tax Lot): Downtown Urban Renewal District Previous density: New density: Acres involved: Applicable statewide planning goals: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 X ® ❑ Is an exception to a statewide planning goal proposed? ❑ YES ® NO Goals: Affected state or federal agencies, local governments or special districts (It is jurisdiction's responsibility to notify these agencies. DLCD only reports this information.): Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, Tri-Met, Metro, and Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation. Local Contact: Cheryl Caines Phone: (503) 718-2437 Extension: Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Fax Number: 503-684-7297 City: Tigard Zip: 97223 E-mail Address: cherylc @tigard-or.gov DLCD file No. SL MITTAL REQUIREME TS This form must be received by DLCD at least 45 days prior to the first evidentiary hearing per ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660, Division 18 1. This form must be submitted by local jurisdictions only (not by an applicant). 2. When submitting, please print this form on light green paper. 3. Send this Form and TWO COPIES of the proposed amendment to: • ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 4. Electronic Submittals: At least one hard copy must be sent by mail or in person, but you may also submit an electronic copy, by either email or FTP. You may connect to this address to FTP proposals and adoptions: webserver.lcd.state.or.us. To obtain our Username and password for FTP, call Mara Ulloa at 503-373-0050 extension 238, or by emailing mara.ulloa @state.or.us. 5. Unless exempt by ORS 197.610(2),proposed amendments must be received at the DLCD's Salem office at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hearing on the proposal. (The clock begins on the day DLCD receives your proposal.) The first evidentiary hearing is usually the first public hearing held by the jurisdiction's planning commission on the proposal. 6. Submittal of a proposed amendment to the text of a comprehensive plan or land use regulation must include the text of the amendment and any other information the local government believes is necessary to advise DLCD of the effect of the proposal. "Text" means the specific language being added to or deleted from the acknowledged plan or land use regulations. A general description of the proposal is not adequate. 7. Submittal of a proposed map amendment must also include a map of the affected area showing existing and proposed plan and zone designations. The map should be legible and on 8'/2 x 11 inch paper. Please provide the specific location of property, such as an address and/or tax lot number. Include text regarding background and/or the justification for the change, such as the application accepted by the local government. 8. Submittal of proposed amendments that involve a goal exception must include the proposed language of the exception. 9. Do not submit this form without supporting documentation. 10. Need More Copies? You can now access these forms online at http://www.lcd.state.or.us/. Please print on 8-1./2x7.1 green paper only. You may also call the DLCD Office at(503) 373-0050; or Fax your request to: (503) 378-5518; or Email your request to mara.ulloa @state.or.us - ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST. http://www.lcd.state.or.us/LCD/forms.shtml Updated November 27,2006 MEMORANDUM T I GARD TO: Planning Division FROM: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner RE: Street Standards for Collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District (CPA2009-00002 and DCA2009-00002) DATE: 3/31/09 This application is for proposed amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan,Transportation System Plan, Development Code, and Municipal Code that will allow vehicle parking and remove the requirement to install bike lanes on collector streets within the downtown. Currently parking is not permitted on collector streets throughout the city and bike lanes are required along collectors in accordance with the Bicycle Master Plan. This amendment will affect the following streets within the downtown: Main Street,Burnham Street, Scoffins Street,and Ash Avenue. Each of these streets is classified as a collector in the Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP). The proposed code changes include: Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards Table 18.810.1, Figure 18.810.2., and code section 18.810.110—to allow vehicle parking along SW Main and SW Burnham Streets and remove the requirement of bike lanes on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.2(c) —remove the requirement to construct bike lanes along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. Transportation System Plan Chapter 8 Motor Vehicles, Figure 8-10 (Arterial and Collector Sample Street Cross Sections) —Criteria within chart regarding On Street Parking is being modified to allow parking on no collectors or arterials with few exceptions. Tigard Municipal Code 10.28.130—Remove the parking restriction for the north side of Burnham Street (Restriction #65). CPA2009-00002 & DCA2009-00002 COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS AMENDMENT April 1, 2009 Explanation of Formatting These text amendments employ the following formatting: 'Bold, Underline and Italic] —Text to be added Proposed code language is as follows: Chapter 18.810 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.810.030 Streets Figure 18.810.2 Collector Sample Cross Sections u (Ord. 02-33) Jim= .716-8'155 it,'Bike 11' 11' 6'Bke 5.5' 6-8' ,5' R/W 2 Lane 581-62'R/W 12'Medlar 15'6-8' 5.5 16'Bke 11' Tun Lane 11' Me 5.5' 6-8' .5' RAN 70'44' 3 LI M11-74'FLW '15;5• 12'Median 5' 6-8' 5,5' ,6•Bike 1 1' , 11' Turn Lane_�____1 1' _ 1 1' ,6'Bike+-_..5._5' 6-8' R/W 92'-96' —� 5 Lane 92'.96'R/W Parkin2 is allowed on SW Burnham and SW Main Streets. Bike Lanes are not required along collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District • 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all Arterial and Collector routes and where identified on the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan(TSP). One exception shall be along Collector routes within the Downtown Urban Renewal District, where bike lanes are not required • • • • 1. • Table 18.810.1 Minimum Widths for Street Characteristics WI tit a to se 14 et Type of Street - p"' `� 3 1 G °' "C y E G a LC - y c R � 3 aa3 b CIO � :° a z 0 `�' Arterial 64'-128' Varies 2-7(Refer to 12' N/A 6' (New Streets) 8' (Res. & Ind.Zones) 5' l2'(1) TSP) 5'-6' (Existing Streets) 10' (Comm.Zones) Collector 58'-96' Varies 2-5(Refer to 11' N/A 6' (New Streets)- 6' (Res. & Ind.Zones) 5' 12'(') TSP) 8,(,1 5'-6' (Existing Streets)W 8' (Comm.Zones) Neighborhood Route 50'-58' 28'-36' 2 10' 8' 5'-6' 5'-642) 5' N/A Local: Industrial/Commercial 50' 36' 2 N/A 5'_'(2) 5' N/A Local: Residential N/A • Under 1500 ADT 5475043) 32'/28'3) 2 8' (both sides) N/A 5'-642) 5' • Under 500 ADT 50'/46'3) 28'/24'3) 2 8' (one side) N/A • Under 200 ADT 46'/42'3) 24'/20'3) 2 (No Parking) N/A Cul-de-sac bulbs in 50' 42' radius N/A N/A N/A N/A Industrial and radius Commercial zones Cul-de-sac bulbs in 47' 40' radius N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Residential zones radius Alley: Residential 16' 16' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alley: Business 20' 20' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (Ord. 02-33) Medians required for 5 and 7 lane roadways. They are optional for 3 lane roadways. 2 Sidewalk widths for these streets shall be 5 ft with landscape strip; 6 ft if against curb(if permitted in accordance with 18.810.070.C). 3"Skinny Street"roadway widths are permitted where cross section and review criteria are met. Refer to corresponding cross sections(Figures 18.810.3, 18.810.4 and 18.810.5)for details and conditions. Parking is allowed on SW Burnham and SW Main Streets. 5Bicvcle lanes are not required on Collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Vol. II 8.1 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM POLICIES 8.1.2 PROVIDE A BALANCED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, INCORPORATING ALL MODES OF TRANSPORTATION (INCLUDING MOTOR VEHICLE, BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT AND OTHER MODES) BY: a. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS THAT RECOGNIZE THE MULTI-PURPOSE NATURE OF THE STREET RIGHT-OF- WAY FOR UTILITY, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE,TRANSIT, TRUCK AND AUTO USE. b. COORDINATION WITH TRI-MET, AND/OR ANY OTHER TRANSIT PROVIDERS SERVING TIGARD, TO IMPROVE TRANSIT SERVICE TO TIGARD. FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT WILL PRIMARILY USE ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS IN TIGARD. DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO TRANSIT ROUTES WILL PROVIDE DIRECT PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITY. c. CONSTRUCTION OF BICYCLE LANES ON ALL ARTERIALS AND COLLECTORS WITHIN TIGARD CONSISTENT WITH THE BICYCLE MASTER WITH THE EXCEPTION OF COLLECTORS WITHIN THE URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT. ALL SCHOOLS, PARKS, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND RETAIL AREAS SHALL STRIVE TO HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO A BIKEWAY. d. CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS ON ALL STREETS WITHIN TIGARD. ALL SCHOOLS, PARKS, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND RETAIL AREAS SHALL STRIVE TO HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO A SIDEWALK. e. DEVELOPMENT OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLANS WHICH LINK TO RECREATIONAL TRAILS. f. DESIGN LOCAL STREETS TO ENCOURAGE A REDUCTION IN TRIP LENGTH BY PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY AND LIMITING OUT-OF-DIRECTION TRAVEL AND PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY TO ACTIVITY CENTERS AND DESTINATIONS WITH A PRIORITY FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS. g. TIGARD WILL PARTICIPATE IN VEHICLE TRIP REDUCTION STRATEGIES DEVELOPED REGIONALLY TARGETED TO ACHIEVE NON-SINGLE OCCUPANT VEHICEL LEVELS OUTLINED IN TABLE 1.3 OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. h. TIGARD WILL SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEM AS PART OF THE REGIONAL TRANSIT NETWORK. • DKS Associates .._.,11.,„;Iil CITY OF TIGARD Transportation •p .., System Plan .i �` r. i11 9 :� n __.,_ ii) • i11 5' 1 6' 16'BikeI 12' I 12' 16'Blke1 6' 5' 11� R/W 60' I 2 Lane 60'R/W 4 i' i .,r.. 1 -. �> fir:;. 12'-14'Media / i1� 5' 1 6' 16'BikeI 12'-13' Turn Lane 1 12'-13' i6'Bike1 6' 1 5' 11� R/W 74' I 3*Lane 74'R/W m � q ,,, .ea e� +% :% _;� u . si 1 14'Median.(_ 11� 5' 1 6' 16'Bike 1 12' I 12' 1 Turn I ane7C1 12' I 12' 16'Bike I 6' 1 5' 11 R/W 98' 5*Lane 98'R/W �i j 12'Median - 11 6' 1 6' 16'Bike] 12' I 12' I 12' I Turn Lane I 12' 1 12' 1 12' (Bike 6'i 6' 1 6' 11'1 1 R/W 98' 1 • 7*Lane 122'R/W Criteria Vehicle Lane Widths: Truck Route=12 ft. (minimum widths) Bus Route= 12 ft. 11 ft. (12 ft.Preferred) Collector 10-11 ft. On Street Parking: None(with few existing exceptions) Bicycle Lanes: New Construction=6 ft. (minimum widths) Reconstruction=5 to 6 ft. Sidewalks:(minimum width) 5-13 ft. Consider Curb Extensions on Ped Routes Landscape Strips: Required Medians: 5/7 Lane=Required 3 Lane=Optional Neighborhood Traffic Only Under Special Conditions: Management: Selected Measures Figure 8-10 *Note that,sidewalk widths above 6 ft.may require additional right-of-way. ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR Where appropriate,the median/lane may not be provided resulting in 2,4 and SAMPLE STREET CROSS SECTIONS 6 lane cross sections. The removal of the center turn lane must consider both REQUIRED ROW WIDTH safety and pedestrian needs. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE terminus thereof; S.W. Genesis Loop, extending from the most southerly intersection thereof with S.W. 115th 49. Within the northerly half of S.W. Avenue easterly a distance of one hundred sixty- Walnut Place; also, within the southwest half of five feet; S.W. Walnut Place beginning at S.W. Pacific and, thence, extending a distance of one hundred 58. Along both sides of S.W. Durham Road seventy-five feet southeasterly along the curbline; between Hall Boulevard and Pacific Highway; 50. Within a portion of the right-of-way of 59. Repealed by Ord. 95-32; S.W. Hampton Street being all that portion thereof lying between S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. 66th 60. Within the west half of the right-of-way Avenue; of S.W. 92nd Avenue, beginning at the intersection thereof with the south right-of-way 51. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; line of S.W. Durham Road; thence, extending southerly one thousand four hundred fifty feet; 52. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; 61. Within the right-of-way of S.W. 92nd 53. Within the southeast half of the most Avenue, beginning at a point which lies one southerly end of S.W. Main Street, beginning at thousand four hundred fifty feet southerly of the the intersection of the southeast curblines of S.W. south right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road; Pacific Highway and S.W. Main Street and thence, extending southerly one thousand one extending seventy-five feet along the Main Street hundred ninety feet; excepting therefrom the south curbline to a point; also, therein, beginning at a six hundred eighty feet of the west half thereof; point on the Main Street curbline which lies two hundred five feet from said intersecting curblines 62. Along the east side of S.W. 85th Avenue and extending thirty feet therealong to a point; from Durham Road to a point four hundred fifty feet south of the south curbline of Durham Road; 54. Within the westerly half of the right-of- way of 115th Avenue extending from the 63. On S.W. Varns Street from S.W. 72nd intersection with S.W. Gaarde Street northerly to Avenue to a point' one hundred twenty-five feet the intersection of S.W. Fonner Street; west of the west curbline of 72nd Avenue; 55. Within the northwesterly right-of-way 64. On S.W. Watkins Avenue from S.W. of S.W. McKenzie Street from a point twenty feet Pacific Highway to a point seventy-five feet west southeasterly from the intersection of the of the west curbline of Pacific Highway; centerlines at S.W. McKenzie St., and S.W. Grant St., to a point ninety feet southeasterly of the 65. Along the north side of S.W. Burnham centerline intersection; _ __ _ - . E t. _ . _ . :.•• • . _. 56. On the northwesterly half of S.W. Ash ._. _ . :, • _. . _. . . • Avenue beginning at the northeast right-of-way line of S.W. Commercial Street and extending thence northeasterly one hundred thirty-eight feet. 66. On S.W. 69th Avenue from Pacific Highway to a point one hundred fifty feet north of 57. Within the curblines on each side of the north curbline of Pacific Highway, measured 10-28-9 SE Update: 10/04 • • • U.S. Postal Service C E R Attn: Patty/Planning r-1 (Dourest RE: CPA2009-00002/DCA2009 00002 ed) is- For delive Downtown Urb.Renewal Dist Pkng. "Notice of Proposed Amendment" ra m Postage rn Certified Fee 'OEM 4,If� I 1 �' Poltrttark ❑ Return Receipt Fee E3 (Endorsement Required) 4", ere G Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) 03 Total Postage&Fees Wen rU Sent To CO 3`iieef,Apt No.; A'i'TN: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST • or PO Box No Oregon Dept.of Land Conservation&Development M1 635 Capital Street NE,Suite 150 City,State,ZIRr4 Salem,OR 97301-2540 r •rill :tt •i-trnin: .,w.........�..�...�...-.... SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELty::?Y • Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. -igpatir- LOIN .nt •item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. X • Print your name and address on the reverse `' .d essee so that we can return the card to you. ,Q; ,., 1 . • �- - • i ive • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, l�,A . t va or on the front if space permits. l D. Is delivery address•iff lent from item 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delive address below: ❑ No ATTN: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST Oregon Dept.of Land Conservation&Development 635 Capital Street NE,Suite 150 3. Service Type Salem,OR 97301-2540 IX Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Dare Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number 7008 2810 0001 3831 8781 (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-rot-1540 r Cheryl Gaines From: Cheryl Caines Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:27 PM To: 'John Mermin' Cc: Ron Bunch; Mike McCarthy Subject: RE: Comments on Tigard TSP/Comp plan/code amendments Hi John, Thank you for your comments. I've discussed your concern about the removal of a bike lane requirement along Main Street with our Director and Transportation Engineer. Our current TSP(Bicycle Master Plan) does not require bike lanes along Main Street and the Regional Transportation Plan does not consider these streets regionally significant. At the same time we understand the importance of bike connections to the Fanno Creek Trail, WES, and other public transportation from Main Street and share your concern about providing those connections. Downtown streets will have lower speeds to accommodate shared lanes where separate bike lanes are not proposed. Along Main Street there are existing conditions such as buildings constructed near the ROW that may make it difficult to accommodate a separate bike lane. The purpose of this amendment is not to eliminate bike lanes along Main Street. We only hope to allow some flexibility when designing it. I know that the City is working with Metro regarding bike traffic on Main Street and will continue to do so as we move forward. Our goal is to design a street that accommodates a wide range of users. Thank you for taking the time to review the proposal. Your comments will be presented to the Planning Commission at tonight's hearing (May 18`h). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Thank you, Cheryl Caines Associate Planner City of Tigard (503) 718-2437 From: John Mermin [mailto:John.Mermin @oregonmetro.gov] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 10:35 AM To: Cheryl Caines Cc: meg.fernekees @state.or.us Subject: Comments on Tigard TSP/Comp plan/code amendments Hi Cheryl, It was good to chat with you on the phone the other day. I reviewed the proposed amendments to the TSP Comp plan, Development Code and Municipal code. After discussing with our engineer, and some of my transportation and land use colleagues, we'd like to express our strong support for allowing parking on collectors in the downtown urban renewal district. However, we are concerned about the removal of the bike lane requirement for one of the downtown collectors, Main Street, due to the high volumes (estimated 10,000 ADT), and the need to make current and future intermodal connections with Fanno Creek Trail, WES station, and possible future LRT station. We are okay with the removal of the bike lane requirement on the other downtown collectors. Thanks for your consideration of our comments. Let me know if you have any questions. John Mermin 1 Associate Transportation Planner Planning Metro 503 797-1747 John.Mermin@oregonmetro.gov www.oregonmetro.gov Metro I People places.Open spaces 2 J Cheryl Caines From: Dick Bewersdorff Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:13 AM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: FW: Amendment to the TSP Did you see this? From: Hal Ballard [mailto:bicyclist @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 11:17 AM To: Dick Bewersdorff Subject: Amendment to the TSP Dear Dick, I've been asked to comment on the Planning Commission's agenda item 5.2 being heard tonight. Prior commitments prevent my appearance, so I hope these comments suffice. I hold to the tenet that"bicyclists fare best when they act and are treated as drivers of vehicles," as such,every travel lane for motor vehicles is a travel lane for cyclists. While they may make sense from a legal standpoint, it may not from a practical one (riding in the left lane on Hwy 99 near Hall Blvd.for example). I, nor the WashCo BTC, have no real objections to this amendment, provided that,even with on street parking,the lanes are made wide enough (14'or more)so bikes and cars can safely share the lane and bicyclists can avoid the dreaded "door zone." (that 3-4'suddenly occupied when a car door is opened) I would also ask that the speed limit in the proposed area be maintained or reduced to 25 MPH as is most downtown traffic in other cities. The average speed of cyclists is around 12 MPH which,compared to vehicular speeds means a difference of about 12 MPH,which would provide enough reaction time by either party to take the actions necessary to prevent a collision. Respectfully submitted, }fG'llil3c Uardi Executive Director/WashCo BTC http://washcobtc.org 503.984.1761 League Cycling Instructor 815/League of American Bicyclists www.bikeleaque.orq Transportation Solutions byCycle °I ride my bicycle to ride my bicycle"-Zen proverb 1 CleanWater Services RECEIVED PLANNING Our commitment is clear. APR 1 7 2009 CITY OF TIGARD MEMORANDUM Date: April 14, 2009 • To: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner, City of Tigard From: Jackie Sue Humphrey;Clean Water Services(the District) Subject: Transportation Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA 2009-00002, ;Downtown Urban Renewal District-Burnham,Main, Scoffms,Ash Clean Water Services has no concerns or objections to the plan amendment request to change the current Transportation System Plan Designation for the above mentioned streets. Any improvements necessary to upgrade these streets to the new designations would require the following: A Clean Water Services (the District)Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. Application for the District's Permit Authorization must be in accordance,with the requirements of the Design and Construction Standards, Resolution and Order No-07-20,_(or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering plan submittal), and is to include: • a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-1. b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required. Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans. If site area and any offsite improvements required for this development exceed one-acre of_ '_ . >-' disturbance,project will require a 1200-C Erosion Control Permit. c. Provisions forwater quality in accordance with the requirements of the above named design standards. Water Quality is required for all new development and redevelopment areas per R&O 07-20, Section 4.05.5, Table-4` \--Acce ss shall be provided for maintenance of facility per R&O 07-20, d. If use of an existing offsite or regional Water Quality Facility is proposed,•it must be clearly identified on plans, showing its location, condition, capacity to treat this site:and, any additional improvements and/or upgrades that may be needed to utilize that facility. 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway• Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600•Fax: (503)681-3603'•www.CleanWaterServices.org e. If private LIDA systems proposed, must comply with the current CWS Design and Construction Standards. A private maintenance agreement, for the proposed private lot LIDA systems, needs to be provided to the City for review and acceptance. f. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water quality related easements must be granted to the City. g. A Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment review is required prior to development. Applicant shall comply with any and all conditions as determined at the conclusion of that review and any improvements will need to be included on the construction drawings. CONCLUSION This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District,prior to issuance of any connection permits, must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations. TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: April 2.2009 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer APR 1 3 2009 FROM City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner(x2437) CITY OF TIGARD Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Email:cherylc( tigard-or.gov COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA)2009-00002/ DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT(DCA)2009-00002 - DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS- REQUEST: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 8.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8-10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130—Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking on SW Main and SW Burnham Streets and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. LOCATION: The Downtown Urban Renewal District. ZONES: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single- family attached housing at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi- family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright; and MUR-1: Mixed-Use High-Density Residential. The MUR-1 zoning district is designed to apply to predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted when compatible with the residential use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.2(c) and Goal 15;and Statewide Planning Goals 1, and 12. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 16,2009(or sooner if possible). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division,13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter or email Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting (\ %\ Y 2561 lig I T I G A R D REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: April 2.2009 TO: Christine Darnell,Code Enforcement Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Gaines.Associate Planner(x2437) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Email:cherylc@tigard-or.gov COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2009-00002/ DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (DCA) 2009-00002 - DOWNTOWN COI.i.F,CTOR STREET STANDARDS- REQUEST: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 8.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8-10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130—Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking on SW Main and SW Burnham Streets and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. LOCATION: The Downtown Urban Renewal District. ZONES: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single- family attached housing at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi- family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright; and MUR-1: Mixed-Use High-Density Residential. The MUR-1 zoning district is designed to apply to predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted when compatible with the residential use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.2(c) and Goal 15; and Statewide Planning Goals 1,and 12. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 16,2009(or sooner if possible). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division,13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: J We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. ]� Written comments provided below: S :t Feae Prig 40' Mfri ///Vi iiiiiii AirC i■ Name&Number of Person Commenting. r TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: April 2,2009 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines.Associate Planner(x2437) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Email:cherylc(u,tigard-or.gov COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2009-00002/ DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (DCA) 2009-00002 - DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS- REQUEST: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 8.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8-10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130—Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking on SW Main and SW Burnham Streets and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. LOCATION: The Downtown Urban Renewal District. ZONES: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single- family attached housing at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi- family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright; and MUR-1: Mixed-Use High-Density Residential. The MUR-1 zoning district is designed to apply to predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted when compatible with the residential use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.2(c) and Goal 15; and Statewide Planning Goals 1,and 12. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 16,2009(or sooner if possible). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting ,� CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C IA0?00°1—0000. NOTIFICA 1 LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY D .OPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: jDGA o2c — 6! - 0000--'-. FILE NAME: yc.,�; ,-h;•.o ,N C,.i l,-*(-hr— Par r1,,, CITY OFFICES ), LONG RANGE PLANNING/Ron Bunch,Planning Mgr. CURRENT PLANNING/Todd Prager/Arborist-Planner X PUBLIC WORKS/Brian Rager,Asst.Public Works Dir. _BUILDING DIVISION/Mark Vandomelen,Plans Ex.Supervisor X ENGINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer _PUBLIC WORKS/Steve Martin,Parks Supervisor _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder X ENGINEERING DEPT.! (ut�t(,t,, _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs.X POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer Mator4ln, PLANNING COMMISSION/GRETCHEN(+12 sets) g CODE ENFORCEMENT/Christine Darnell,Code Compliance Specialist(DCA) 0 X FILE/REFERENCE(+2 sets) SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* &' .TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* CLEAN WATER SERVICES* Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Development Services Department 15707 SW Walker Road John K.Dalby,Deputy Fire Marshall 1850 SW 170"Avenue David Schweitzer/SWM Program Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97006 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Beaverton,OR 97005-1152 Hillsboro,OR 97123 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON tR _ CITY OF TUALATIN>* ___OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager Devin Simmons,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required) Steven Sparks,Dev.Svcs Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. _ Joanna Mensher,Data Resource Center(2CA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris(Maps a cws Letter Only) 0 Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/20A) Mara Ulloa(Comp Plan Amendments&Measure 37) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager 'I C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powerlines in Area) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 _Naomi Vogel-Beattie(General Apps Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Planning Division(zcA)MS 14 OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * X Brent Curtis(CPA) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Development Review Coordinator Doria Mateja(zcA)Ms 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Sr.Cartographer(CPA/zCA)MS 14 1900 SW 4°'Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Jim Nims,Surveyor(ZcA)MS 15 Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _OR.PARKS&REC.DEPT. _WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* L ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(wcccA)-s11"Psonocore Towers) Sam Hunaidi,Assistant District Manager (Notify if ODOT R/R•Hwy.Crossing is Only Access to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Sr Crossing Safety Specialist (Notify M Property Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13'"Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner Street NE,Suite C Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES A sr PORTLAND WESTERN RIR,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Bruce Carswell,President&General Manager 1200 Howard Drive SE Albany,OR 97322-3336 X lit SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS Jt,COMCAST CABLE CORP. y TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Gerald Backhaus is.e Map Oar Areecwawp (If Protect is Within%Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 it PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC 6NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY It VERIZON IOC/WEST COMMUNICATIONS Mike Hieb Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. John Cousineau,OSP Network Lynn Smith,Eng.ROW Mgr. 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd. 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J _BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 *COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jennifer Garland,Demographics Alex Silantiev (See Map for Area canla ) Brian Every(49.LarW?la9ow) 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg.12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 • INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED: 28-Aug-08) (Also update:i,\curpin\setup\labels\annexations\annexation_utilities and franchises.doc,mailing labels&auto text when updating this documer 11 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ut© ; ° D I,Patricia L. Luns ford,being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Assistant for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Chet k Appmpnalr Bux(s)Mow) © NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR CPA2009-00002/DCA2009-00002 - DOWNTOWN COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS (File NoJName Reference) ❑ AMENDED NOrICE HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE: ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ® Tigard Planning Commission 5/18/2009 ® Tigard City Council (6/23 /2009 A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on June 29,2009,and deposite. • : United S . es ' n June 29,2009,postage prepaid. / 4/110°'' Qi i (Person that P .. ed Notice) j STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the l day of ,2009. OFFICIAL SEAL f �•-M1 SHIRLEY L TREAT (j "e"% . NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ' C�( �' COMMISSION NO.418777 f RAY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 2S,2011 N Y PUB OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 44 Jai I I APPLICANT MATERIALS • PRE-APR HELD BY: tr, CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISI IUD LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION CE City(f Tigard Perak Cerner 13125 SW Hall Kul, Tigzn OR 97223 MAR `.' 3 2009 Phone. 503.639.4171 Fax: 503.598.1960 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNW G/ENGINEERIN a File# Cpild Oo' - 0000,J, Other Case# bCA aov c 1 ' OODUa. Date 3 a3 U By C9 C641' Receipt# Fee Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑ Adjustment/Variance (I or II) ❑Minor Land Partition(II) ❑ Zone Change(III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review(I,II or III) ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment(IV) ❑ Historic Overlay(II or III) ❑Site Development Review(II) ❑ Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III) LOCATION-WHERE PROPOSED Acny!IY WILL OOCJR(Address if available) fhtigebeietagagifelara D644414 - (Liba i Rene+.'ia l Di s c- TAX MAPS&TAX LOT NOS. TOTAL SITE SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICATION APPLICANT' C'-k Or �I"i o)ar d MAILING ADDRESS/CTfY/STATE/ZIP 131,15 Jk) R-a(l 131ud . T% ard b2 970)19 PHONE NO. FAX NO. (5u3) l039- (4171 PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO. Chert/ � C.et;:-, (Sn3) 9 - 13 /7 PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach list if more than one) NJ, MAILING ADDRESS/QTY/STATE/ZIP PHONE NO. FAX NO. *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(PIease be specific) 0--1\a Co Mpr eherLj;vC 1 lam 11,-»Pnd7-74,m - j (,1 4 PcoPoj,al be reel opmena Cade A,r,Ecid r f ( Cilia") 1(i / 8. gl U ) a L.." pa rid, t5 Q cS(l) M a.;c7 d BO r.1114"-% Siree-Of and -I-0 vfr-no !C -P_ re bits,reM e/cf -t-t1r' bike la.ne.i cooncl ec;((ee+',.r Do.-4) -s (,Lrba-I Re ne (A)al 0;3+'r,C. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. is\curpin\masters\land use applications\land use permit app.doc THE APPLICANT SHALL CEh.iFY THAT: o If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. o All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. o The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). • SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's.Signature Date (�l a • C d3 -0 Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date , . ., . , • IN a LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION TIGARD 120 DAYS =N/A FILE NOS.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2009-00002 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (DCA) 2009-00002 FILE TITLE: DOWNTOWN COI J F.CTOR STREET STANDARDS APPLICANT: City of Tigard Attn: Cheryl Gaines 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8189 REQUEST: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 8.1.2.c), Transportation System Plan (Chapter 8, Figure 8-10), Tigard Development Code (Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards), and the Municipal Code (10.28.130 — Motor Vehicle Parking). The proposed amendments will allow vehicle parking on SW Main and SW Burnham Streets and remove the requirement for bike lanes on collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. LOCATION: The Downtown Urban Renewal District. ZONES: CBD: Central Business District. The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered on the City's historic downtown,including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family attached housing at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright;and MUR-1: Mixed-Use High-Density Residential. The MUR-1 zoning district is designed to apply to predominantly residential areas where mixed-uses are permitted when compatible with the residential use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.2(c) and Goal 15;and Statewide Planning Goals 1,and 12. COMMENTS SENT: APRIL 2,2009 DUE: APRIL 16,2009 DATE DLCD NOTICE WAS SENT: APRIL 1,2009 (47 days prior to first evidentiary hearing) DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ❑TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ® TYPE IV PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: MAY 18,2009 TIME: 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL TUES.)DATE OF HEARING: JUNE 23,2009 TIME: 7:30 PM COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION IA PROPOSED ORDINANCE/AMENDMENTS DA STAFF REPORT IN DLCD NOTICE 8 VICINITY MAP SITE PLAN STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Gaines,Associate Planner (503) 718-2437 MEMORANDUM TIGARD TO: Planning Division FROM: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner RE: Street Standards for Collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District (CPA2009-00002 and DCA2009-00002) DATE: 3/31/09 This application is for proposed amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan,Transportation System Plan,Development Code, and Municipal Code that will allow vehicle parking and remove the requirement to install bike lanes on collector streets within the downtown. Currently parking is not permitted on collector streets throughout the city and bike lanes are required along collectors in accordance with the Bicycle Master Plan. This amendment will affect the following strccts within the downtown: Main Street, Burnham Street, Scoffins Street, and Ash Avenue. Each of these streets is classified as a collector in the Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP). The proposed code changes include: Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards Table 18.810.1, Figure 18.810.2., and code section 18.810.110— to allow vehicle parking along SW Main and SW Burnham Streets and remove the requirement of bike lanes on collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.2(c) —remove the requirement to construct bike lanes along collector streets within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. Transportation System Plan Chapter 8 Motor Vehicles, Figure 8-10 (Arterial and Collector Sample Street Cross Sections) —Criteria within chart regarding On Street Parking is being modified to allow parking on no collectors or arterials with few exceptions. Tigard Municipal Code 10.28.130 —Remove the parking restriction for the north side of Burnham Street (Restriction #65). CPA2009-00002 & DCA2009-00002 COLLECTOR STREET STANDARDS AMENDMENT April 1,2009 Explanation of Formatting These text amendments employ the following formatting: [Bold,Underline and Italic] —Text to be added Proposed code language is as follows: Chapter 18.810 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.810.030 Streets Figure 18.810.2 Collector Sample Cross Sections u (Ord.02-33) • 5'. 6-8' 5.5' 6'Bike, 11' 11' 6'Bike.5.5' _ 6-8' R1W 58'-62' 2 Lane 581-62'R/W • 12'Median/ 6-8' 5.5' 6'Bike,.. 11' Turn Lane 11' 6'Bike 5.5' 6-8' ,5 RAN 70'-74' 3 Lane 70'-74'R/W • '1 `T.: te '•' ;,.. ,- r. -, .5 12'Median; 5' 6-8' 5.5' 6'Bike. 11'. ..11' _Turn Lane _ . 11' 11' 6'Bike 5.5' 6-8' R/W 92'-96' 5 Lane 92-96'R/W "1Parking is allowed on SW Burnham and SW Main Streets. Bike Lanes are not required alone collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all Arterial and Collector routes and where identified on the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan (TSP). One exception shall be along Collector routes within the Downtown Urban Renewal District, where bike lanes are not required. Table 18.810.1 Minimum Widths for Street Characteristics L ez - tC 3 I.. • aa + .0 d ei Type of Street c ei 3 a y „d [� [ • a Z g O to a Arterial 64'-128' Varies 2 -7(Refer to 12' N/A 6' (New Streets) 8' (Res. &Ind.Zones) 5' 12'w'w TSP) 5'-6' (Existing Streets) 10'(Comm. Zones) Collector 58'-96' Varies 2-5(Refer to 11' NA 6' (New Streets)- 6' (Res. & Ind.Zones) 5' 12'(1) TSP) 8,0 5'-6' (Existing Streets)L! 8' (Comm. Zones) Neighborhood Route 50'-58' 28'-36' 2 10' 8' 5'-6' 5'-6'(2) 5' N/A Local: Industrial/Commercial 50' 36' 2 N/A 5'--6'(2) 5' N/A Local: Residential N/A • Under 1500 ADT 54'/5043) 32'/28'(3) 2 8' (both sides) N/A 5'-6'(2) 5' • Under 500 ADT 50'/46'(3) 28'/24'(3) 2 8' (one side) N/A • Under 200 ADT 46'/42'(3) 24'/20'(3) 2 (No Parking) N/A Cul-de-sac bulbs in 50' 42' radius N/A N/A N/A N/A Industrial and radius Commercial zones Cul-de-sac bulbs in 47' 40' radius N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Residential zones radius Alley: Residential 16' 16' N/A _ N/A N/A N/A N/A Alley: Business 20' 20' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (Ord. 02-33) Medians required for 5 and 7 lane roadways. They are optional for 3 lane roadways. 2 Sidewalk widths for these streets shall be 5 ft with landscape strip; 6 ft if against curb(if permitted in accordance with 18.810.070.C). 3"Skinny Street"roadway widths are permitted where cross section and review criteria are met. Refer to corresponding cross sections(Figures 18.810.3, 18.810.4 and 18.810.5)for details and conditions. Parking is allowed on SW Burnham and SW Main Streets. SBicycle lanes are not required on Collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District. Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Vol. II 8.1 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM POLICIES 8.1.2 PROVIDE A BALANCED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, INCORPORATING ALL MODES OF TRANSPORTATION (INCLUDING MOTOR VEHICLE, BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT AND OTHER MODES) BY: a. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS THAT RECOGNIZE THE MULTI-PURPOSE NATURE OF THE STREET RIGHT-OF- WAY FOR UTILITY, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE,TRANSIT, TRUCK AND AUTO USE. b. COORDINATION WITH TRI-MET, AND/OR ANY OTHER TRANSIT PROVIDERS SERVING TIGARD, TO IMPROVE TRANSIT SERVICE TO TIGARD. FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT WILL PRIMARILY USE ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS IN TIGARD. DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO TRANSIT ROUTES WILL PROVIDE DIRECT PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITY. c. CONSTRUCTION OF BICYCLE LANES ON ALL ARTERIALS AND COLLECTORS WITHIN TIGARD CONSISTENT WITH THE BICYCLE MASTER WITH THE EXCEPTION OF COLLECTORS WITHIN THE URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT. ALL SCHOOLS, PARKS, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND RETAIL AREAS SHALL STRIVE TO HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO A BIKEWAY. d. CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS ON ALL STREETS WITHIN TIGARD. ALL SCHOOLS, PARKS, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND RETAIL AREAS SHALL STRIVE TO HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO A SIDEWALK. e. DEVELOPMENT OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLANS WHICH LINK TO RECREATIONAL TRAILS. f. DESIGN LOCAL STREETS TO ENCOURAGE A REDUCTION IN TRIP LENGTH BY PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY AND LIMITING OUT-OF-DIRECTION TRAVEL AND PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY TO ACTIVITY CENTERS AND DESTINATIONS WITH A PRIORITY FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS. g. TIGARD WILL PARTICIPATE IN VEHICLE TRIP REDUCTION STRATEGIES DEVELOPED REGIONALLY TARGETED TO ACHIEVE NON-SINGLE OCCUPANT VEHICEL LEVELS OUTLINED IN TABLE 1.3 OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. h. TIGARD WILL SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEM AS PART OF THE REGIONAL TRANSIT NETWORK. DKS Associates , . A CITY OF TIGARD b Transportation r `` System Plan yl I • ti7 i 1 5' 1 6' 16'Mel 12' I 12' 16'Blke l 6' I 5' 1 � e R/W 60' + 2 Lane 60'R/W iliciII t' •12'-14'Media / I1' 5' I 6' 16'Bike 12'-13' I Turn Lane 12'-13' 16'Bikei 6' 15' I1� R/W 74' { 3* Lane 74'RAN .W .F, .R if ri .mo w.: �: 14'Median I 1� 5' 1 6' 16'Bike l 12' I 12' I Turn lane I 12' I 12' 16'Bike' 6' 1 5' Ili 1 R/W 98' I 5*Lane 98'R/W 4 •F, OR {5. .c .% . -- 4 4 _ II tiii 12'MedianL I1� 6' I 6' 16'Bike I 12' 1 12' I 12' I Turn I ane 1 12' 1 12' 1 12' (Bike 6'1 6' 1 6' Ill 1 R/W 98' I 7*Lane 122'R/W Criteria Vehicle Lane Widths: Truck Route= 12 ft. (minimum widths) Bus Route=12 ft. 11 ft. (12 ft.Preferred) Collector 10-11 ft. On Street Parking: None(with few existing exceptions) Bicycle Lanes: New Construction=6 ft. (minimum widths) Reconstruction=5 to 6 ft. Sidewalks:(minimum width) 5-13 ft. Consider Curb Extensions on Ped Routes Landscape Strips: Required Medians: 5/7 Lane=Required 3 Lane=Optional Neighborhood Traffic Only Under Special Conditions: _Management: Selected Measures Figure 8-10 *Note that,sidewalk widths above 6 ft.may require additional right-of-way. ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR Where Where appropriate,the median/lane may not be provided resulting in 2,4 and SAMPLE STREET �I CROSSp S�E�CTIONLS 6 lane cross sections. The removal ofthe center turn lane must consider both REQUIRED R®•• WIDTH safety and pedestrian needs. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE terminus thereof; S.W. Genesis Loop, extending from the most southerly intersection thereof with S.W. 115th 49. Within the northerly half of S.W. Avenue easterly a distance of one hundred sixty- Walnut Place; also, within the southwest half of five feet; S.W. Walnut Place beginning at S.W. Pacific and, thence, extending a distance of one hundred 58. Along both sides of S.W. Durham Road seventy-five feet southeasterly along the curbline; between Hall Boulevard and Pacific Highway; 50. Within a portion of the right-of-way of 59. Repealed by Ord. 95-32; S.W. Hampton Street being all that portion thereof lying between S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. 66th 60. Within the west half of the right-of-way Avenue; of S.W. 92nd Avenue, beginning at the intersection thereof with the south right-of-way 51. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; line of S.W. Durham Road; thence, extending southerly one thousand four hundred fifty feet; 52. Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; 61. Within the right-of-way of S.W. 92nd 53. Within the southeast half of the most Avenue, beginning at a point which lies one southerly end of S.W. Main Street, beginning at thousand four hundred fifty feet southerly of the the intersection of the southeast curblines of S.W. south right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road; Pacific Highway and S.W. Main Street and thence, extending southerly one thousand one extending seventy-five feet along the Main Street hundred ninety feet; excepting therefrom the south curbline to a point; also, therein, beginning at a six hundred eighty feet of the west half thereof; point on the Main Street curbline which lies two hundred five feet from said intersecting curblines 62. Along the east side of S.W. 85th Avenue and extending thirty feet therealong to a point; from Durham Road to a point four hundred fifty feet south of the south curbline of Durham Road; 54. Within the westerly half of the right-of- way of 115th Avenue extending from the 63. On S.W. Varns Street from S.W. 72nd intersection with S.W. Gaarde Street northerly to Avenue to a point one hundred twenty-five feet the intersection of S.W. Fonner Street; west of the west curbline of 72nd Avenue; 55. Within the northwesterly right-of-way 64. On S.W. Watkins Avenue from S.W. of S.W. McKenzie Street from a point twenty feet Pacific Highway to a point seventy-five feet west southeasterly from the intersection of the of the west curbline of Pacific Highway; centerlines at S.W. McKenzie St., and S.W. Grant St., to a point ninety feet southeasterly of the : - . _ . : . • centerline intersection; _ _ •• -1 ::. _ . . . . ..•• • . _. 56. On the northwesterly half of S.W. Ash ... . : :, . _. _ • . _ . Avenue beginning at the northeast right-of-way ; line of S.W. Commercial Street and extending thence northeasterly one hundred thirty-eight feet. 66. On S.W. 69th Avenue from Pacific Highway to a point one hundred fifty feet north of 57. Within the curblines on each side of the north curbline of Pacific Highway, measured 10-28-9 SE Update: 10/04