Loading...
City Council Packet - 02/19/2013 • City of Tigard TIGARD Tigard Workshop Meeting— Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: February 19, 2013 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Times noted are estimated. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503 - 639 -4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503 -684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503 - 639 -4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503 - 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: http:/ /www.tvctv.org /government - programming/ government - meetings / tigard Workshop meetings are cablecast on Tualatin Valley Community TV as follows: Replay Schedule for Tigard City Council Workshop Meetings - Channel 28 • Every Sunday at 7 a.m. • Every Monday at 1 p.m. • Every Wednesday at 2 p.m. • Every Thursday at 12 p.m. • Every Friday at 3 p.m. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA s • City of Tigard Tigard Workshop Meeting— Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: February 19, 2013 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. WORKSHOP MEETING - FEBRUARY 19, 2013 A. Call to Order- City Council B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Council Communications & Liaison Reports E. Call to Council and Staff for Non - Agenda Items 2. ANNUAL REPORT - TIGARD MUNICIPAL COURT 6:35 p.m. - time is estimated 3. BRIEFING - INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH METRO FOR MANAGEMENT OF THE FIELDS PROPERTY 6:55 p.m. - time is estimated 4. UPDATE - SW CORRIDOR PLAN PROJECT 7:05 p.m. - time is estimated 5. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 6. NON AGENDA ITEMS 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 8. ADJOURNMENT 8 p.m. - time is estimated AIS -1098 2 Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 02/19/2013 Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes Agenda Title: Tigard Municipal Court Annual Report Prepared For: Nadine Robinson Submitted By: Nadine Robinson, Administrative Services Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Judge Michael O'Brien and Nadine Robinson, Administrative Services Manager, will provide an update on the status of the Municipal Court and discuss how the implementation of the presumptive fine has impacted the court. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST N/A KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY 2012 was a busy year for the Tigard Municipal Court with over 9,000 violations processed. Along with the increase in violations came the accompanying increase in calls, paperwork, data entry, and time spent in the courtroom. Staff was very appreciative of the Police Department's use of e- citation technology. 67% of the violations received in 2012 were issued using electronic cites. The court was able to import the data into the case management system helping to keep entry of new citations manageable and errors at a minimum. The on -line payment system continues to be a successful tool with over 2,600 payments received through CitePay USA in 2012. During the 2011 legislative session, the state established a uniform Presumptive Fines schedule. The presumptive fines are lower than the fines in the previous base fines schedule and includes a $60 assessment. As a result, the number of violations disposed of in 2012 increased 13% but the amount of fine and fees imposed only increased 6.5 %. Disseminating information to the public concerning Oregon law and the judicial process remains a very high priority for the court. The judge continues to author a monthly "Rules of the Road" column for the Cityscape. His articles are available on -line as well as many of them being available to the public at the court counter. The court's overall objectives remain the same: deterring unlawful and unsafe conduct through a combination of sanctions and education, while recognizing and accommodating individual needs as permitted by Oregon law. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The annual court report for 2011 was presented February 21, 2012. Attachments 2012 Court Report 2012 Court Report PowerPoint If MEMORANDUM • T I GARD TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Michael J. O'Brien, Presiding Judge Nadine Robinson, Court Manager RE: 14th Annual Report from Tigard Municipal Court DATE: February 5, 2013 We appreciate the opportunity to meet with Council and the City Manager for our 14th annual review of Tigard Municipal Court (TMC) operations. The information on the court's caseload is based on data from CY 2012 and previous calendar years. As always, we welcome your questions and comments. 1. Overview of court operations: As in past years, the vast majority of TMC's caseload consists of traffic violations cited under state statute. The court also adjudicates civil infractions under the Tigard Municipal Code and limited adult misdemeanors. For many years, TMC has been among the busiest of approximately 150 municipal courts in Oregon. This caseload reflects Tigard's residential, commercial and industrial growth, along with heavy traffic volumes associated with the presence of three major state highways and a regional shopping center. 2. Caseload increase during CY 2012: As reflected in Table 1, the court's workload increased by 9% over 2011 to nearly match our record volume of 2009. The 9,105 cases filed in 2012 also represent a 30% increase over 2010. Table 1- Annual Court Caseloads CY 2008 -12 2012 9,105 2011 8,349 2010 7,028 2009 9,165 2008 6,229 The above totals reflect all traffic, parking, civil infraction and misdemeanor cases filed with the court during the past five years. Despite the high volume in 2012, 93% of citations were disposed of within 90 days of filing. The near - record caseload in 2012 is consistent with recent trends. During the 2005 -2008 baseline period, for example, the average annual caseload was about 6,400 violations. From 2009- 2012, the annual average was over 8,400, an increase of about one third. During 2012, 759 cases were filed with the court each month on average. In August, 1,160 violations were filed, a new record for a single month. Although variations in case flow are not unusual, the quarterly fluctuations during the last two years were striking: Table 2 - Quarterly Caseloads 2011 -12 Quarter 2011 2012 I 1,594 2,221 II 2,088 2,506 III 2,893 2,891 IV 1,778 1,487 Note that the court's caseload declined by about half during the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to the third quarter. A number of variables produce such variations, including PD staffing levels, work schedules and enforcement priorities. Downward fluctuations in the number of filings are sometimes helpful after peak periods since they allow court staff to catch up with trial settings, collections activity and other administrative duties. As in past years, nearly half the court's caseload consisted of just two categories of violations: Speeding and Failure to Obey a Traffic Control Device (primarily traffic lights and stop signs). Cellphone violations (Unlawful use of a Mobile Communications Device) increased substantially during 2012 compared to the two previous years, thanks in part to recent changes in Oregon law. Citations for Following Too Closely, the most common cause of collisions in Tigard, also increased. Table 3 Violation types 2012 Speeding 3,103 Traffic control 984 Cellphones . 857 Following viol 681 Seatbelts 467 2 In addition, TMC processed nearly a thousand license and insurance violations, or about 10% of our total caseload, during 2012. Defendants who showed valid proof of insurance at the time of the traffic stop qualified for dismissal under Oregon law. If they come into compliance before their first court appearance, defendants cited for license, registration and equipment violations receive substantial reductions in fines or even dismissals (usually upon payment of an administrative fee). As in past years, roughly one -tenth of the caseload (857 violations in 2012) was docketed for trial after defendants entered "not guilty" pleas. Based on data from 2008 -09, we estimate that about a third of those cited were residents of Tigard. 3. Diversion programs: Teenage drivers (18 and under), seniors over 60 and drivers who commit seatbelt violations may qualify for dismissal of their citations if they complete a safety class approved by the court. To qualify, defendants are required to appear in court for arraignment, plead "no contest" and have a clear record for the past five years. They must also pay a fee to the court equal to the minimum fine and complete the class within 90 days. Upon proof of compliance, the citation will be dismissed and a conviction will not appear on the DMV driving record. Each diversion program is designed to be revenue - neutral for the court. Some nearby courts, like Beaverton and Sherwood, have less stringent eligibility requirements for diversion programs, offering them to all offenders with clear driving records. With support from a private grant, Tigard PD is developing a Distracted Driving Safety Campaign. As the program is implemented, TMC will consider a proposal to create a diversion program based on the current seatbelt model. 4. Youth Court: Due to the discontinuation of PD's Peer Court for budgetary reasons, no juvenile misdemeanors were filed in TMC's Youth Court during 2012. With the potential reactivation of Peer Court, the City may wish to consider the role Youth Court might play in providing juvenile services. The analysis is complicated by recent case law (State v. Fuller) requiring court - appointed counsel for qualified defendants accused of certain misdemeanors that are reduced to violations by prosecutors. The fiscal viability of Youth Court could be affected by further court rulings or legislative action on this issue. 5. Public Information: Disseminating information to the public concerning Oregon law and the judicial process remains a very high priority for the court. The judge's monthly "Rules of the Road" column in Cityscape began in 2007; many of these columns have been converted to handouts that are available to the public at the court counter. As noted above, the court plans to participate actively in Tigard PD's Distracted Driving Safety Campaign. 6. Budget highlights: The court imposed $1,467,304 in fines and fees during 2012, compared to $1,377,227 million the previous year. Of the total fines imposed in 2012, TMC has collected 67% to date 3 7. Caselaw and pending legislation: During the 2011 legislative session, the state established a uniform Presumptive Fines schedule and imposed a $60 assessment on all fines imposed for traffic violations. Proposed Senate Bill 180 would reduce the state's assessment to $45, though it would still have first priority. A recent appellate decision (State P. Richardson) imposed limits on DMV's ability to impose court - ordered license suspensions for defendants who fail to pay fines for traffic violations. This decision has limited the flexibility of Oregon courts in collecting unpaid judgments. About 12% of TMC defendants were suspended for failure to pay fines during 2012, so we will closely monitor the proposed legislative fix on this issue. Senate Bill 6, if enacted, will enhance cellphone violations from Class D ($110 presumptive fine) to Class B ($260 presumptive fine). It would also require ODOT to place signs around the state notifying drivers that a violation is "subject to a maximum fine of $1,000." Enhanced penalties could lead to an increase in trials for this type of violation. 8. Technology enhancements: Improved technologies continue to increase efficiencies both in and out of the courtroom. E -cite devices are becoming more widely available to officers, reducing data entry by court staff and increasing legibility. In 2012, 67% of our citations were filed electronically. Video evidence has become commonplace during trials and video quality has improved markedly. There are also fewer delays in retrieving video evidence from network directories. The court received 2,621 online payments last year through CitePay USA. 9. Other activities in 2012: With the judge now entering findings, judgments and other data on a laptop during trials, staff is free to perform other tasks while acting as judicial assistants in the courtroom. The judge served on the Court Fines Research Workgroup formed by the League of Oregon Cities to analyze recent and proposed changes in Oregon law relating to fines and state assessments. The judge also attended ODOT's annual Judicial Education Conference in March. In closing, we wish to express our deep appreciation of our court staff for their dedication, hard work and professionalism in the face of heavy workloads: Chris Snodgrass, Brenda Annis and Branden Taggart. Please let us know if you would like any additional information. Thank you again for your time and interest. 4 Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done 2013 Annual Report to Council Tigard Municipal Court Michael J. O'Brien, Presiding Judge Nadine Robinson, Manager Presented to: Tigard City Council February 19, 2013 , [ CARD CAN of Tigard Municipal Court Programs 1. Traffic 2. Civil infractions 3. Public information City of Tigard 2012 Calendar Year Highlights ► 9,105 violations filed record volume ■ 9% increase over 2011 ■ One -third increase over 2005 -08 baseline ■ 1,160 violations in August record for a single month ■ 857 violations docketed for trial ■ 93% of cases closed within 90 days City of T igard Violations Filed 2008 — 2012 10,000 9,000 — 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 - 2,000 1,000 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 111 = Violations City of Tigard Top 5 Violation Types — 2012 3,500 3,000 — -- -- 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 ■ Speeding Traffic control Cellphones Following viol Seatbelts City of Tigard Compliance Program - 2012 ■ About 1,000 license and insurance violations filed ■ Insurance violations dismissed under ORS if valid insurance at time of stop ■ Fines reduced for license, insurance and equipment violations upon proof of compliance ■ Dismissals in appropriate cases, usually with an administrative fee City of Tigard Public Information Program ■ Traffic safety programs for those in diversion ■ Judge and staff provide information at counter and in the courtroom ■ Monthly "Rules of the Road" column in Cityscape since 2007 ■ Trial brochure for "not guilty" pleas ■ Possible role in PD's Distracted Driving Safety Program City of Tigard Diversion Programs — 2012 ► Teen drivers 18 and under ■ Seniors over the age of 60 ► Seatbelt violations City of Tigard Diversion Requirements — 2012 ► Clear DMV record for past 5 years ► Pay TMC administrative fee equal to fine ■ Attend approved safety class within 90 days ■ Case then dismissed — no DMV entry ► Revenue - neutral for TMC City of Tigard Tigard Youth Court ■ No juvenile misdemeanors filed in 2012 ■ PD's Peer Court discontinued is being reactivated ■ TMC Youth Court could be restored ■ Co- ordination with Peer Court and Washington County Juvenile Court ■ Evaluate fiscal impacts of case law on court - appointed attorneys City of Tigard Budget - 2012 ■ $1,501,719 in fines imposed in 2012 ■ $1,179,203 imposed in 2011 ■ 27% increase ■ 87% collection rate for 2012 City of Tigard Case Law and Pending Legislation ■ 2012 Court of Appeals decision limits DMV's ability to suspend for nonpayment of fines — legislative fix pending ► SB 180: Would reduce state's $60 priority share of fines to $45 ► SB 6: Raises fines for cellphone violations from $110 to $260 City of Tigard Technology Advances ■ Video evidence commonplace during trials ■ Videos easier to retrieve from PD directories ► E -cite devices available to more officers: reduces data entry for court staff ■ 67% of citations filed electronically in 2012 ■ 2,600 online payments via CitePay USA City of Tigard Other Court Activities ► Judge served on Court Fines Research Workgroup — League of Oregon Cities ■ Judge now entering findings and judgments during trials, freeing judicial assistant ► Judge attended ODOT's annual Judicial Education Conference in March City of Tigard Tigard Municipal Court 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Court staff: Chris Snodgrass Brenda Annis Branden Taggart www.tigard-or.gov/court AIS -1148 3 Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 02/19/2013 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Briefing on an Intergovernmental Agreement with Metro Regarding the Management of the Fields Property Prepared For: Steve Martin Submitted By: Greer Gaston, Public Works Council Workshop Item Type: Meeting Type: Mtg. Public Hearing Newspaper Legal Ad Required ?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Briefing on an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with Metro regarding the management of the Fields property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST No action is required; the council will consider the IGA on its February 26, 2013, consent agenda. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY On July 24, 2012, the council adopted Resolution No. 12 -30 whereby the city: 1. Committed $2 million toward the purchase of the Fields property. 2. Obtained joint ownership of the property with Metro. 3. Agreed to develop an intergovernmental agreement with Metro on the management of the property. The attached IGA fulfills item 3 (above) by addressing how the Fields property will be managed. Significant terms of the IGA are summarized below: • Metro will provide initial stabilization activities such as removal of invasive plants and installation of native plants. • The city, at its expense, will manage the property during the interim period, which extends from the date this agreement is signed until a Site Conservation and Management Plan is developed and approved by Metro and the city. • The city will continue to manage the property, including trails and restored and developed areas, beyond the interim period. Management will include ongoing maintenance, security and operation of facilities, projects or improvements such as fences, gates, outdoor furniture or structures, utilities, signage and lighting. The city will also be responsible for resolving nuisances (like illegal camping, graffiti, dumping of trash) and removal of invasive plants and maintenance of vegetation (following stabilization). • When available, the city may participate in Metro programs that provide funding to resolve nuisances. • If the city fails to resolve nuisances, Metro may abate the nuisance and charge the city. • The initial term of the IGA will be five years. Unless terminated by Metro or the city, the agreement will automatically renew for additional five -year terms. The city has similar management agreements for two other Metro -owned properties within the city. This IGA is not related to the Site Conservation and Management Plan. That plan w711 spell out how the property is used —what portion of the property remains in a natural state versus what portion of the property is actively managed, developed, mowed, etc. That plan has not been developed, but will come before council for formal consideration at some future date. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The council could propose changes to the IGA. In adopting Resolution No. 12 -30, the council committed to develop —in conjunction with Metro —an agreement regarding the management of the Fields property. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Not applicable DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION July 24, 2012 - the council adopted Resolution No. 12 -30 whereby the city agreed to develop an intergovernmental agreement with Metro on the management of the property. April 24, 2012 - the council discussed the city's $2 million contribution toward the purchase of the property in executive session. Fiscal Impact Cost: Estimated $10,000 Budgeted (yes or no): No * Where Budgeted (department /program): Parks Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: For the next few years, staff estimates the city's costs to manage the Fields property will be less than $10,000 annually. Actual costs will depend upon the number and severity of nuisances, work required to maintain restoration efforts initiated during the stabilization period, etc. The cost to manage the property may increase in the future: • As Metro phases out stabilization activities. • If the property is developed and improvements necessitate a higher level of maintenance. * Since the city did not anticipate purchasing the Fields property, it did not include property management costs in the fiscal year 2012 -2013 budget. However, staff is confident that these expenses can be managed within the existing Park Division budget. Attachments Fields Property IGA • INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (Fields Trust Property Management) This Intergovernmental Agreement ( "Agreement ") is entered into this day of , 2012 (the "Effective Date "), by and between THE CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal corporation (the "City "), and METRO, a metropolitan service district established pursuant to Oregon law and the Metro Charter ( "Metro "). RECITALS A. On September 13, 2012, Metro and City jointly purchased certain real property located in the City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon, commonly known as Tax Parcel 1200 (R0456081) in Section 1 of Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, and more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A (the "Property "). B. The Property is located within the Fanno Creek Target Area, an area specifically identified in Metro Ballot Measure 26 -80 (the "2006 Natural Areas Bond Measure ") as regionally significant due to its wildlife habitat values and its contribution to water quality. C. Metro and City wish to manage the Property to protect water, habitat, and to restore native species and therefore desire to enter into this Agreement to provide for the responsibilities and obligations of the parties with respect to the management, maintenance, and operation of the Property in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants of the parties set forth in this Agreement, the receipt and adequacy of which are acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Initial Stabilization Period. Metro may take whatever actions it deems appropriate, in the period immediately following Closing, to stabilize the Property, which stabilization activities may include construction, maintenance, or repair of facilities, projects, or improvements (such as fences or gates), removal of invasive plants, and replanting of native plants. Except for those items specifically delegated to the City as set forth on the Communication and Maintenance Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B, Metro will bear all costs associated with implementation of the stabilization program. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Metro shall not construct permanent improvements without advance notice to the City and obtaining written consent from the City. 2. Interim Protection Guidelines a. From the effective date of this Agreement until completion of the Site Conservation and Management Plan, as defined below in Section 3 (the "Interim Period "), the City shall manage, maintain, secure, and operate the Property in accordance and in a manner consistent with the Metro Greenspaces Master Plan, the Tigard Municipal Code, the Tigard Page 1 — Fields Trust Property IGA 50014-70897 1GA Fields Property 12 612.docldm/1 /14/1013 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and this Agreement (this Agreement and these plans collectively referred to herein as the "Plans "). In case of conflict among Plans, the Plan affording the highest level of resource protection shall govern. b. During the Interim Period, the City shall control security and access to the Property, and shall respond to neighborhood or citizen complaints regarding improper use on the Property in accordance with the Communication and Maintenance Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B. Following Metro's completion of its stabilization activities, the City may, at its discretion, allow informal public access to the Property for passive recreation, habitat enhancement, and pedestrian activity. All uses of the Property in the Interim Period shall be consistent with this Agreement and with the Plans. The City shall not allow any such informal use if to do so would effectively preclude any potential uses of the Property that could later be allowed in the Site Conservation and Management Plan. c. Following Metro's completion of its stabilization activities, the City shall not allow or permit any alteration of any water, timber, mineral, or other resource on the Property, except for the control of exotic, non - native, invasive, or pest plant species, as necessary to prevent Property degradation, or to address security or public safety concerns. A list of the anticipated vegetation management activities to be conducted by the City is set forth in the Communication and Maintenance Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B. If the City believes that an improvement, trail, or alteration of any water or timber resource on the Property is necessary prior to adoption of a Site Conservation and Management Plan for the Property, Metro shall have the right to approve of such action, which approval shall be in writing, and the City shall provide Metro sixty (60) days advance written notice of its intent to construct any improvements, trails, or alteration of water or timber resource on the Property. In any event, no capital improvements or trails shall be constructed on the Property, and no alteration of water or timber resource shall occur, that are inconsistent with this Agreement or that would effectively preclude any potential uses of the Property that could later be allowed in the Site Conservation and Management Plan. 3. Long -Term Management, Maintenance, and Operation. a. Metro and the City, in consultation with one another, shall jointly develop long -term management guidelines for the Property (the "Site Conservation and Management Plan"). The Site Conservation and Management Plan will divide the Property approximately between those areas that will be (i) kept natural, such that native vegetation planted on the Property during the stabilization period is free to grow, requiring decreasing maintenance over time (the "Natural Area "), and (ii) actively managed, developed, or mowed, requiring approximately the same amount of maintenance over time (the "Maintained Area "). With respect to each management area, the Site Conservation and Management Plan will set forth the acceptable management, operation, and maintenance for the area, the types and levels of programmed and public uses and trails, improvement standards, and signage plans and standards. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge and agree that the division of the Property in this manner is somewhat approximate, and will cooperate in good faith in those portions of the Property that overlap or could be viewed to serve both purposes and functions. Page 2 — Fields Trust Property IGA 50014-70897 1GA Fields Property 12 612.dockfm/1/24/2013 b. In accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the Site Conservation and Management Plan, the City shall be responsible for the Management (as defined below) of both the Maintained Area and the Natural Area. As used in this Agreement, the term "Management" means the ongoing maintenance, security, and operation of the applicable portion of the Property and of any facilities, projects or improvements located thereon, such as fences, gates, outdoor furniture or structures, utilities, signage and lighting. Management includes, without limitation, removal of invasive weeds, maintenance of vegetation, abatement of nuisances, and the responsibility to coordinate with other governmental agencies regarding any issues that may arise under such other agencies' jurisdiction. Specifically, if any permits are necessary for the Management of a management area, the City shall be responsible for obtaining the permit, and Metro shall reasonably cooperate in such efforts. Each party shall be responsible for its proportionate share of taxes or assessments for the Property, based on their percentage ownership interest in the Property. The City shall be responsible for funding the Management with its own financial and staffing resources. Notwithstanding the above, the City may, from time to time, in its sole discretion, seek Metro's assistance with Management of the Property. Upon the City's request, Metro may, in its sole discretion, agree to assist with Management of the Property as requested by the City. c. The City shall act in a timely manner to resolve nuisance complaints and mitigate threats to the resources of its management area. If the City is issued a nuisance notice for activities occurring on the Property ( "Nuisance Notice "), then the City shall forward the notice to Metro. If, at the time the City receives a Nuisance Notice, Metro has a program in place that would reduce or cover the cost to abate the nuisance ( "Program "), and the City is eligible to participate in such Program, Metro agrees to work with the City, so that the City may become a participant in the Program and use the Program funds to assist in abating the nuisance and covering the costs associated with such abatement. If no Program exists, and the City does not abate the nuisance in accordance with the time set forth in the Nuisance Notice, Metro may, at its sole option, abate the nuisance and provide the City with an invoice for the reasonable cost of such work. d. All requests for new easements, rights of way, and leases not already burdening or affecting the Property at Closing shall be submitted to Metro in accordance with the Metro Easement Policy, Resolution No. 97- 2539B, passed by the Metro Council on November 6, 1997, attached hereto as Exhibit C. Any decision regarding the naming of all or any portion of the Property must be in accordance with Metro Code Chapter 2.16, as it may be amended. e. The parties will jointly develop a Master Plan for the Property identifying which areas may be developed for recreational uses and which areas will be maintained in a natural state. The Master Plan for the Property is subject to the approval of each party and shall be developed collaboratively, with either Metro or the City performing the role of project manager. 4. Term. Unless modified or terminated as provided herein, this Agreement shall continue in effect for a period of five (5) years. This Agreement shall thereafter automatically renew for additional five -year terms unless, not later than ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the then - current term of this Agreement, one of the parties provides the other party with notice that it does not wish to renew this Agreement. The parties may, by written agreement signed by Page 3 — Fields Trust Property IGA 50014 -70897 IGA Fields Property 12 612.docldm /1/24/2013 each party, terminate all or a part of this Agreement based upon a determination that such action is in the public interest. Termination under this section shall be effective as providing in such termination agreement. Termination shall have no affect on ownership of the Property. 5. Termination for Cause. Any party may terminate this Agreement in full, or in part, at any time if that party (the "terminating party") has determined, in its sole discretion, that the other party has failed to comply with the conditions of this Agreement and is therefore in default (the "defaulting party "). The terminating party shall promptly notify the defaulting party in writing of that determination and document such default as outlined herein. The defaulting party shall have thirty (30) days to cure the default described by the terminating party. If the defaulting party fails to cure the default within such thirty (30) day period, then this Agreement shall terminate ten (10) days following the expiration of such thirty (30) day period. 6. Indemnification. The City, to the maximum extent permitted by law and subject to the Oregon Tort Claims Act, ORS Chapter 30, shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless Metro and Metro's officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all liabilities, damages, claims, demands, judgments, losses, costs, expenses, fines, suits, and actions, whether arising in tort, contract, or by operation of any statute, including but not limited to attorneys' fees and expenses at trial and on appeal, relating to or resulting from the performance of its obligations under this Agreement or actions taken by City pursuant to this Agreement on the Property including but not limited to the management, maintenance, security, or operation of the Property, including but not limited to construction of trails or in relation to any other improvements on the Property. Metro, to the maximum extent permitted by law and subject to the Oregon Tort Claims Act, ORS Chapter 30, shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless the City and the City's officers, employees, elected officials, and agents from and against any and all liabilities, damages, claims, demands, judgments, losses, costs, expenses, fines, suits, and actions, whether arising in tort, contract, or by operation of any statute, including but not limited to attorneys' fees and expenses at trial and on appeal, relating to or resulting from Metro's performance of its obligations under this Agreement or actions taken by Metro pursuant to this Agreement on the Property including but not limited to those actions taken under Section _above. 7. Insurance. Each party agrees to maintain insurance levels or self - insurance in accordance with ORS 30.282, for the duration of this Agreement at levels necessary to protect against public body liability as specified in ORS 30.270. 8. Oregon Constitution and Tax Exempt Bond Covenants. A source of funds for the acquisition of the Property is from the sale of voter - approved general obligation bonds that are to be paid from ad valorem property taxes exempt from the limitations of Article XI, section 11(b), 11(c), 11(d) and 11(e) of the Oregon Constitution, and the interest paid by Metro to bond holders is currently exempt from federal and Oregon income taxes. The City covenants that it will take no actions that would cause Metro to be unable to maintain the current status of the real property taxes as exempt from Oregon's constitutional limitations or the income tax exempt status of the bond interest. In the event the City breaches this covenant, Metro shall be entitled to whatever remedies are available to either cure the default or to compensate Metro for any loss it may suffer as a result thereof. Page 4 — Fields Trust Property IGA 50014-70897 IGA Fields Property 12 6 12 . docldm/1/24/2013 9. Laws of Oregon; Public Contracts. The laws of the State of Oregon shall govern this Agreement, and the parties agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of Oregon. All applicable provisions of ORS chapters 279A, 279B, and 279C, and all other terms and conditions necessary to be inserted into public contracts in the State of Oregon, are hereby incorporated by this reference as if such provisions were a part of this Agreement. 10. Assignment. No party may assign any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement without prior written consent from the other party, except that a party may delegate or subcontract for performance of any of its responsibilities under this Agreement. 11. Notices. All notices or other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered (including by means of professional messenger service) or sent by both (1) electronic mail or fax, and (2) regular mail. Notices shall be deemed delivered on the date personally delivered or the date of such electronic or fax correspondence, unless such delivery is on a weekend day, on a holiday, or after 5:00 p.m. on a Friday, in which case such notice shall be deemed delivered on the next following weekday that is not a holiday. To Metro: Director, Sustainability Center 600 N.E. Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232 -2736 Fax: (503) 797 -1849 To City: Parks and Facilities Manager City of Tigard Parks and Recreation Department 13125 SE Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 12. Severability. If any covenant or provision of this Agreement shall be adjudged void, such adjudication shall not affect the validity, obligation, or performance of any other covenant or provision which in itself is valid, if such remainder would then continue to conform with the terms and requirements of applicable law and the intent of this Agreement. 13. Entire Agreement; Modifications. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements or representations relating to the Property. No waiver, consent, modification, amendment, or other change of terms of this Agreement shall bind either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. 14. Counterparts; Facsimile Execution. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which, when taken together, shall constitute fully executed originals. Facsimile or e-mail signatures shall operate as original signatures with respect to this Agreement. Page 5 — Fields Trust Property IGA 50014- 7089 7 1GA Fields Property 12 612.docldm/l /24/1013 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed-this Agreement as of the Effective Date. CITY OF TIGARD METRO By: Print Name: Chief Operating Officer Title: Date: Date: Page 6 — Fields Trust Property IGA 50014- 70897 (GA Fields Property /2 6 12.docds ll/2412013 Exhibit A Property Description Beginning at an iron pipe at the reentrant corner on the South line of the W.W. Graham Donation Land Claim No. 39, in Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon and running thence North 1 East 1020.7 feet to a square iron at the Northeast corner of EDGEWOOD; thence North 89 West along the North line of said subdivision 151.1 feet to a corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to Rudolph Hunziker and Sophia G. Hunziker by Deed as recorded January 30, 1912 in Book 90, page 271; thence North 4 East along the property line 597.1 feet to the Southwest corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to the Oregon Electric Railway Company by Deed as recorded in Deed recorded May 17, 1909 in Book 83, page 163; thence South 43 East along the Southerly line of said tract of land 400.0 feet to the most Easterly corner thereof; thence South 41 East along the Southerly boundary of the Oregon Electric Railroad right of way 1737.57 feet to an iron pipe on the South line of the said W.W. Graham Donation Land Claim, also being the North line of Government Lot 5 in Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian; thence North 88 West 1349.96 along the South line of said W.W. Graham Donation Land Claim and the North line of Government Lot 5 and Government Lot 6 of in Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West to the place of beginning. TOGETHER WITH easement for ingress and egress as granted in Grant of Easement recorded February 22, 2006, Recording No. 2006 - 020491, described as follows: Located in a tract of land situated in the Southeast one - quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. The Easement is described as follows: Commencing at the 5/8" iron rod with yellow plastic cap marked DEHAAS & ASSOC. INC. set at the intersection of the Easterly right -of -way of SW Hall Blvd 30 feet from center line, with the South line of Lot 1, EDGEWOOD as shown on Survey No. 29031 of the Washington County Survey Records; thence South 87 East, along said South line, a distance of 291.15 feet; thence North 75 East a distance of 47.71 feet to the True Point of Beginning and point of curve of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 479.00 feet, a central angle of 13 (a chord which bears North 68 East 113.89) and a length of 114.16 feet; thence North 52 East a distance of 472.50 feet to the East line of Lot 1 EDGEWOOD; thence North 02 East, along said East line, a distance of 43.09 feet to a 5/8" iron rod with yellow plastic cap marked DEHAAS & ASSOC. INC. at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 87 West, along the Northerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 45.63 feet; thence South 62 West a distance of 455.14 feet to a point of curve of a curve to the right; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 419.00 feet, a central angle of 13 (a chord which bears North 68 East, 99.62) and a length of 99.86 feet; thence South 14 East a distance of 60.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Exhibit A — Fields Trust Property IGA Exhibit B Communication and Maintenance Schedule Fields Property, City of Tigard Stabilization Period Interim Period Tigard Metro Tigard Projected Costs Communication For all communication between the City Stabilization, vegetation control, For all communication between the City of of Tigard and Metro: Steve Martin, natural area maintenance: Kate Tigard and Metro: Steve Martin, (503) 718 -2583 (503) 718 -2583 Holleran, 503- 813 -7543 Safety, security and general property issues: Dan Moeller, 503- 797 -1819 Site Inspection The site will be inspected weekly for The site will be inspected weekly for illegal use, illegal use, safety issues or maintenance safety issues or maintenance needs. needs. Mowing The meadow will be mowed twice The meadow will be mowed twice during during growing season (early summer growing season (early summer and early fall) to and early fall) to manage invasive plants manage invasive plants and lower fuel levels. and lower fuel levels. Illegal Camping Patrol/Removal Monthly Monthly Vandalism Reports of vandalism will be responded Reports of vandalism will be responded to to within 24 hours of notification. within 24 hours of notification. Safety Hazards Immediate response after notification. Immediate response after Immediate response after notification. notification. Ivy Control Invasive plants treatments will be Natural area should be inspected twice yearly to The forested site should be relatively stable conducted throughout the identify any EDRR species and evaluate need after weed control is accomplished. stabilization period. for targeted invasive plant control. —$40 /ac/year for long teen maintenance. Blackberry Control Blackberry in open Maintenance spray of blackberry in open Approximately $1800 per treatment (crew 7 forest/woodland will be sprayed forest/woodland area on 3 -5 year schedule. for 1 day). during stabilization or cut/sprayed if larger concentrations are present Reed Canary Grass Control Reed canarygrass will be treated to prepare planting sites for native vegetation. Weed Tree Control (Holly, Cut stump treatment will be Inspected to monitor weed tree re- Approximately $2100 per treatment (crew 7 hawthorn, laurel) conducted on weed trees during growth/seedlings. Plan on re- treatment every 5- for 1 day) stabilization period. 7 years. Planting Revegetation of natural areas will Final maintenance may transition to Tigard if Approximately $1800 per yearly circle occur throughout the stabilization Tigard manages entire site. Circle sprays should spray treatment (crew 7 for 1 day). period. be conducted until plants are free to grow. Approximately $2100 per yearly (typically 5 years). Release cutting/mowing in cutting/mowing treatment (if needed). conjunction with circle sprays may be necessary Stabilization funds are typically available depending on competing vegetation. until plants are free to grow. Exhibit B — Fields Trust Property IGA Exhibit C Easement Policy } I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING 1 IS A COMPLETE X PLETE AND ACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL THEREOF BEFORE THE METRO COUNCIL itI FOR THE PURPOSE OF APPROVING GENERAL ) RESOLUTION NO. 97 -2539B POLICIES RELATED TO THE REVIEW OF ) 1 EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND LEASES ) FOR NON -PARK USES THROUGH PROPERTIES) MANAGED BY THE REGIONAL PARKS AND ) Introduced by GREENSPACES DEPARTMENT. ) Mike Burton, Executive Officer WHEREAS, Metro currently owns and manages more than 6,000 acres of regional parks, open spaces, natural areas, and recreational facilities; and WHEREAS, additional lands are being acquired through the Open Space, Parks, and Streams Bond Measure, approved by voters in May of 1995; and WHEREAS, the primary management objectives for these properties are to provide opportunities for natural resource dependent recreation, protection of fish, wildlife, and native plant habitat and maintenance and /or enhancement of water quality; and WHEREAS, Metro will be approached with proposals to utilize regional parks, open • spaces, natural areas, and recreational facilities property for utility, transportation, and other non -park purposes; and WHEREAS, Metro seeks to insure that these uses have no negative impact upon the primary management objectives of Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces properties; and • WHEREAS, it would be in Metro's best interest to provide for the orderly evaluation and consideration of proposals to utilize portions of Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces properties for utility, transportation and other non -park uses; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Metro Council hereby adopts the policy attached as Exhibit "A" for any and all requests related to formal proposals for the use of Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces properties for the purposes noted therein. ADOPTED by the Metro Council this co day of 1% , 1997. • • Jon K ad, Presiding Officer ATTEST: Approved as to Form: .A./ tea. ► _ A , ■ coning S • retary ' Daniel :. Cooper, Ge/ ral Counsel • Exhibit C — Fields Trust Property IGA '1 • ..F Exhibit "A" METRO POLICY RELATED TO THE REVIEW OF • EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND LEASES • • FOR NON -PARK USES Metro owns and manages , either on its own or in partnership with other government and private entities, several thousand acres of regional parks, open spaces, natural areas and recreational facilities. These facilities are maintained to promote and preserve natural resources and recreational opportunities for the public consistent with the Greenspaces Master Plan adopted by the Metro Council in 1992, the Open Spaces Bond Measure approved by the voters in 1995 and other restrictions limiting the uses of specific properties in existence at the time of its acquistion by the public. Nothing in this policy shall be construed to allow these facilities to be used in any manner which detracts from this primary purpose. This policy is written from the perspective of Metro as the property owner, however, in those cases in which Metro co -owns a property with other entities, all decisions concerning the use of the property in question will be fully coordinated with the other owners. In addition, all new development and all proposed work within Water Quality Resource Areas or other environmentally sensitive work will be conducted in accordance with Metro or local government policies, to include where appropriate, application for permits and completion of environmental reviews. In event that local government policies arc less restrictive than the Metro Model ordinances, Metro will apply the more restrictive Metro policies. Regarding requests for easements, right of ways, and leases for non -park uses in Metro owned or managed regional parks, natural areas or recreational facilities, it is Metro's policy to: 1) Provide for formal review of all proposed easements, right of ways, and leases for non- park, uses by the Regional Parks and Greenspaces Advisory Committee, the Regional Facilities Committee and the full Council. Notwithstanding satisfaction of the criteria set forth herein, the final determination of whether to approve a proposed easement, right of way, or lease is still subject to the review and approval by the full Metro Council. 2) Prohibit the development of utilities, transportation projects and other non -park uses within corridors or on sites which are located inside of Metro owned or managed regional parks, natural areas, and recreational facilities except as provided herein. j 3) Reject proposals for utility easements, transportation right of ways and leases for non -park I . uses which would result in significant, unavoidable impacts to natural resources, cultural resources, recreational facilities, recreational opportunities or their operation and management. 4) Accommodate utility easements, transportation right of ways or other non -park uses when the Regional Parks and Greenspaces Department (the Department) determines that a proposed easement, right of way or non -park use can be accommodated without significant impact to Exhibit C — Fields Trust Property IGA • natural resources, cultural resources, recreational facilities, recreational opportunities or their operation and management; and that the impacts can be minimized and mitigated. 5) Require full mitigation and related maintenance, as determined by the Department, of all • unavoidable impacts to natural resources, recreational facilities, recreational opportunities or their operation and management associated with the granting of easements, right of ways, or leases to use Mctro owned or managed regional parks, natural areas or recreational facilities for non -park uses. t. 6) Limit rights conveyed by easements, right of ways, and leases for non -park uses to the minimum necessary to reasonably accomplish the purpose of any proposal. • 7) Limit the term of easements, right of ways and leases to the minimum necessary to accomplish the objectives of any proposal. • 8) Require "reversion ", "non - transferable" and "removal and restoration" clauses in all easements, right of ways and leases. • 9) Fully recover all direct costs (including staff time) associated with processing, reviewing, analyzing, negotiating, approving, conveying or assuring compliance with the terms of any easement, right of way, or lease for a non -park use. 10) Receive no less than fair market value compensation for all easements, right of ways, or leases for non -park uses. Compensation may include, at the discretion of the Department, periodic fees or considerations other than monetary. II) Require full indemnification from the easement, right of way or lease holder for all costs, damages, expenses, fines or losses related to the use of the easement, right of way or lease. Metro may also require appropriate insurance coverage and/or environmental assurances if deemed necessary by the Office of General Counsel. 12) Limit the exceptions to this policy to: grave sales, utilities or transportation projects which are included in approved master /management plans for Metro regional parks, natural areas and recreational facilities; projects designed specifically for the benefit of a Metro regional park, natural area, or recreational facility;•or interim use leases as noted in the Open Spaces Implementation Work Plan. 13) Provide for the timely review and analysis of proposals for non -park uses by adhering to the following process: a) The applicant shall submit a detailed proposal to the Department which includes all relevant information including but not limited to: purpose, size, components, location, • existing conditions, proposed project schedule and phasing, and an analysis of other alternatives which avoid the Metro owned or managed regional park, natural area or recreational facility which are considered infeasible by the applicant. Cost alone shall not constitute infeasibility. Exhibit C — Fields Trust Property IGA • • • b) Upon receipt of the detailed proposal, the Department shall determine if additional information or a Master Plan is required prior to further review and analysis of the proposal. For those facilities which have master plans, require that all proposed uses are consistent with the master plan. Where no master plan exists all proposed uses shall be consistent with the Grcenspaces Master Plan. Deficiencies shall be conveyed to the applicant for correction. • c) Upon determination that the necessary information is complete, the Department shall review and analyze all available and relevant material and determine if alternative alignments or sites located outside of the Metro owned or managed regional park, natural area, or recreational facility are feasible. d) If outside alternatives are not feasible, the Department shall determine if the proposal can be accommodated without significant impact to park resources, facilities or their operation and management. Proposals which cannot be accommodated without significant impacts shall be rejected. If the Department determines that a proposal could be accommodated without significant impacts, staff shall initiate negotiations with the applicant to resolve all issues related to exact location, legal requirements, terms of the agreement, mitigation requirements, fair market value, site restoration, cultural resources, and any other issue relevant to a specific proposal or park, natural area or recreational facility. The Department shall endeavor to complete negotiations in a timely and business -like fashion. e) Upon completion of negotiations, the proposed agreement, in the appropriate format, shall be forwarded for review and approval as noted in item "1" above. In no event shall construction of a project commence prior to formal approval of a proposal. • • 1) Upon completion of all Metro tasks and responsibilities or at intervals determined by the Department, and regardless of Metro Council action related to a proposed easement, right of way or lease for a non -park use, the applicant shall be invoiced for all expenses or the outstanding balance on expenses incurred by Metro. g.) Permission from Metro for an easement or right -of -way shall not preclude review under applicable federal, state or local jurisdiction requirements. I � Exhibit C — Fields Trust Property IGA AIS -1135 4 Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 02/19/2013 Length (in minutes): 40 Minutes Agenda Title: SW Corridor Plan Update Submitted By: Judith Gray, Community Development Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Council will hear an update of the Southwest Corridor Plan project, including recent Steering Committee decisions and upcoming activities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST NA KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY At their February 11 meeting, the Southwest Corridor Plan Steering Committee was asked to select five "bundles" of projects to be advanced for detailed analysis. Each of the project bundles includes one high capacity transit (HCT) alternative (Attachment A) and a set of integrated roadway and active transportation projects (Attachment B). The outcome of the analysis will provide a wide range of evaluation measures including capital costs, transit operating cost, travel times for auto and transit, projected transit ridership, and property impacts, among others (Attachment C). These evaluation results will be used later by the Steering Committee to select and /or develop a preferred "shared investment strategy ", which could be one of the five alternatives or could combine individual elements of multiple alternatives. The HCT mode and alignment identified through this process will be carried forward for additional analysis and engineering, as required for federal transit funding. HCT Alternatives The HCT alternatives include one light rail transit (LRT) and four bus rapid transit (BRT) options. The alternatives reflect Steering Committee direction from their October meeting. Illustrations of the HCT alignments are provided in Attachment A. They include the following: A. LRT to Tigard, with potential extension to Tualatin B. BRT to Tigard C. BRT to Tualatin D. BRT to Sherwood E. BRT to Tigard, with Hub /Spoke options. These alignments were developed to reflect the priority locations for making HCT connections, as well as local preferences for specific alignments. For example, in Tigard, each HCT alignment connects to downtown Tigard at the Transit Center and to at least one but potentially two locations in the Triangle. The alignments avoid Pacific Highway (99W within Tigard), respecting local concerns about impacts to traffic conditions and property access. Transportation Project Bundles Each HCT alignment has an associated set of roadway and active transportation projects which are being included in the analysis. These are provided in map and list form in Attachment B. These project bundles were compiled from a list of more than 500 projects and narrowed down to 48 roadway and 84 active transportation projects. In narrowing the project lists, staff sought to identify projects that would be needed to ensure the success of a new HCT line, improve multimodal safety and mobility, and also support local land use visions. Upcoming Steering Committee Meetings This phase of the Southwest Corridor Plan is scheduled to be completed in June 2013. The following Steering Committee discussions and decisions are scheduled for upcoming months. • April 8: Discussion of economic development strategies, housing strategies, policy changes, and green investments.? • May 13: Discussion of evaluation results; Recommendation on preferred strategy(s)? • June 10: Report on Community Input; Adoption of preferred shared investment strategy(s) and implementation plan Attachment D shows the dates of upcoming Steering Committee meetings, as well as planned public involvement activities. OTHER ALTERNATIVES NA COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Goal 1.b.ii. Contribute to the Southwest Corridor Plan by adopting Tigard's land use policies and designations and identifying priorities for high- capacity transit (HCT) station location alternatives by mid -2012. Long Term Goal. Continue pursuing opportunities to reduce traffic congestion. Long Range Objectives. Tigard's interests in regional and statewide issues are coordinated with appropriate agencies and jurisdictions. Tigard citizens are involved in the community and participate effectively. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION SW Corridor Plan November 15, 2011 November 20, 2012 Agenda items associated with High Capacity Transit Land Use Plan January 18, 2011 April 26, 2011 July 19, 2011 November 18, 2011 May 15, 2012 August 14, 2012 Attachments Attachment A. HCT Alignment Options Attachment B. Project Bundles Attachment C. Analysis Measures Attachment D. Project Schedule i ^ i 14, Southwest Corridor L RT to TigarA Options ■ l ry ''S L''' F . N PERD " � � � �Q Q ' if, 1 ts DEMSELINEM ( " + " + L y 3 , � i A • 111 a ' r°^". . y NZ .PRe ::: 1 � I S � e c EMMIDRO \, IM' / ; A li l� v NSFTHk vA' '' &WB Z f� G E.P i4i • ' ®7 , RD - ROOW '4YDR `. �1 O ps , j wf Y S W 7UALq T iN tgLL EYHWY ` . 4, } + ,x i a ■ ,° a ° , 0 ` y y Wpb 1 y j t N GTON RD y1 5 I:,7 Sm a/ FARM -.•,5 fq: .. .. fit , e Ni T , ,� i ,• , y ". SW CAMERON CD S / & • i i ' . SWoxew 1:.._I� !" SW ALLEN BLVD _ n I .- � ry 3 �i.'/C ' '' C.7:.p ST Q . L A, 1. D i '6. :;," ,, % , eccramaj - --W_ , -s ( 1 8 SW HART RD y ; rs '' `p MA LLV,D l!�' S. .,'7HOME RD `r" - — ,, ...a j ... ......... , Irr‘ y o eVJ ° �, R 5 4 i R r ± IL ° filf r re . ; r . _ , ._. oR���� ' 5 � ,,,"R"- 5 � 0 P R e�� '` g � t P , ,. I k '' arDROCKMC ST 1 - 43 ,, _ T SW T AYLO RSG• 'D _. ,► t J ' Q ti \y ` R7 � ' x F. 8 �'• ' � emus' r "• as �' - �' R � � .. . �' QMi PO MON A SST / Or• ° d " .., J + ■ ¢ n , h ? .. ,' 9 r SW STEPHENSON7 w 7r � j p '' X 4',9 ,I /,� unity=Cpleye � R:r r. - 1 'ri i D ye ' *Gs .4, oy I F S r t 00- P, �..� ,\\0 OU N S.T s o bD R RD NL e . I � DOW i + , 1-V ° TIMBER 1 . K WY r „ � t , iv I - MEL RO SE ST B . TT/ . ° Lt a ,f n ° tom ,( :: °:-• �' -"- r , r co„ v R Y fb,,.� P P "pi, ,_ if - , MN/ DONAL 2 4 - 8 �E r p. e , , . • r • JM SW BOHIA RD SW 80NITA RD y GAR ? /1',pG�+�. D ? yM • O a � UNTA /N LVD "'�t '' 1 lr ) • }- H 1 P v i> LAK C nom^ ��.riZs' ice .. - , e °a t a x 3 5�j z 3 y J ✓ dy �;R°... °' i 0 y i j Q 7 E �'J GD h / P .,, ,r- 8 ocoup ' . ii 9 16. i' 4h z ,JD • y ;y.. :. r ' Y JEA RD w VE F�L1T��� p , I - Brid lags o f °3 4 0 \k.r 0 , l e jr . . _ 7 I _� �3 CHILD 5l s) P° F A O IFIG Sn,Ca • * P o l ati' S ' � 1 I€tD,D PQ 1 r s , S W S) e 1 A.... ss! NE R't , SW AVERY ST �_ R + ' einVIV t A i 49 0 .05 0 R EGO 1v' 1 • e / 5 � 0 �'►�•• y e+ ' „++ "x °.. `., Q JOHNS O Z,. r Sherw • 1 i * if Z I B mSUNSET BLVD - ..- .y 4: li. \ 0 ' I A: LRT to Tigard Representative Alignment Options Metro Region - \ - Basel -- Prioritized Key Places � - - - Alternative Alignment , Existing Transit l Other Key Places 0 0.5 Miles Streets Study Area 11 V, Metro Southwest Corridor 1::::; to ri Ti gad ; Alignment lig iota n: .. e . :_ •.... : 1, 1: 0 7 ;4101, :i Options 4 , „, „, I s$ CO: 031.4"0 0; .4. so i 1404.4411v: Alf :::17: . .74 k — 7 r - ' " • ' , - 1■11111 y 7 k (6P Citid - ' - * A CEA ELINE AD 4b•,,,, 4, 441;41 il'it . \ / !it A ' ...t HSE0 0 " -44 . 4 .4s , R0 t 41. ____—,.....rswiso 4`411 . ri-; - / o''' ' „-- 0 " It =.i."1 i ataiga0 RIP v e a ..- a , ,w, ale 0 , , 1 er, ,z9G S 10-° i ,..• —74%0QD 0 ...,• pAl . / , ,.... , ... 1 ■ , „ 1, - 1- Lc .4 I m 1. ' 4:p 1. 1 1 ...is._ Z ii. ,,,,,. # , Nil . , , ,.. s„.,, fp p. ' * r (I' 6 sw ruAtgr * ‘; 41 ,jY Vo I * ; '444.ET HWY 4•4 44 .4/' , /k , 0Aigmir , p ,.... illiktziniii „,,,N ,...GTO gi' Vila 0 II 4. o 4, s k njd • 41 111 ,. • 700- ,27,0......_ I& e Sty CAMERON ar, <4,44 t i 1 w. \ V 3 ," 1w 'k eva k ify , ; 7 sw ALLEN BLVD , klrUNCOZVCif U Alla 7:; ,,,, : 1 Utre ii . . .. . $t OD . ■ .111 - • • .. A. IV , 4*.•■■%,. al ' .4n 4 4. 44. 4 ,1 % 4. ss., _ ', cii t, , .4F. \ ,- e s. T. . % , aracouta - .,, A da. ..1- _ , . ,„ -- „ 414, aZ MUL MOW BLVD imp..g.,_.. / s 4 0 ,.. . SW HART RD '', rt '1" ' i 111 ,, ..„, &Da' 3 X @Sg HOME DOA, 4, pi , • , 11• ., 4111 ,... o o - t , i gir ,,, 9,511111 , '46444„,.. t ., ,. r 2 1.. so`''' :C °4 -.)... , Aloie OR"' / '''' i 0 * ' k # - ., „t. 1 , i . , ,,,Le k . 62 EtRocKm4/Y sr 5 4 .. ipit, t; mivtrivabcrazap •r- g ,.. „, i 1 g it ' i ;,:!.., ' : iiiiip. - e II M 14 .., li k '•■ ,i •& il Of igi, tio • g S I MN I i; ott,4 If erscaaron ST 4 sw S TEPHENSON EV 4 rS. 4 ., 4. E,) , 1 ot, " iit l'-9o.p.,, 7 in 42) _ or ,. ,-,-4- i„ ii. ,-- 11111F 1 .. ` 4 : ity-c t o ' ::ege 1 ,,j,54 ° 4:2 /1111111pourri 0 - ) . ' ZI:i 4 \.'D '41 sT 4‘4 ---*;',4-- * ;■-•• 4 , i k.. idgpl " ,. v „A„NuTge ,. . gr. ' , .,,,,,.. , .......... sr 0 Kwyit "If TI &MERLIN , ' .11111. r 1 sw • D,pw , Ill . 44 ' ( it Ft _ 1 i - ,,,,,,,,,,..s • ,, . ,-;',•:-, ,-. IL 4.1,- ‘‘#:# 4 - ' i i ' \a. 1 1 v ■ .• fi, , & "J ` •V11144 IV SW GAARDE STO ei3E7 MCDONALD . . ._ (!-', Iv' .F.' tfil , ,n. -o-9041111111p0. 44 4' we a SW BO A RD Y c.P:" 11 NIT SW BONITA RD 0ONT4ify BLVD tt - ,0‘' „. " 111 I. -,, 1 1 6. OW II ‘ \ 47 -W 1.9 ' .' ' g'■ i * ". 4 - -1 sii.,.. 4'. 1 .. . ! 1 1 ) : L iii, ,. 411c".0 . 0 00 --'-`-'- „i••,t; •‘• 1 ,_ j., 0 , :°, - .4 \ _ ,„,- ' - a U " - - __ 4 Di. i a , " 07 CM222MAD MAL cetax20 / 4( 0 0 ,z• fi g 1 4iii:CgO -. , fr a , . -,„ , ... R ,...$0' u ,.... 9: o ,ct . , f - Ilk is, g pl- e armagga L Brid JEA R la , II -, Tel 1 0 7 '; ' • / , I is, r lei oz .n. _.t.. . ECYRICAMOGID ,, ,.• OD ). 5 to k CHILDS A.1 , 1 - - sw C all PP Ei a" lavi .,,' ''-- 41i now lair . - , • I li •c , SW SAGERT s l rd I a N:alLerper) 1 0 0 0 _ envisalls t 1 A __,- , oert- sw AVERY ST - -"-----"' — 1 ''.1 ' " ' )5 • ' , , , • mr 12 q- ! e., i ,. ,.._ , r , ,,,„ 44, TC I 4 ,, - - i4 IF - ie ..., ,. _ . gh .., : . .,. ...: _ .., . , 4.EGONa7 r u ,fw•-••- , ,4 ' , , n . se # sherwookt iit. B k° •:',,.' ' -..,, 2 1 4 s. 4 , ) . t■ ( - *s . 004, co' i t ", ,,,,, ., -.1 0 • ?.. - . 1 b CMS NSET BL , =NEMO ` .., Metro Region , . .\N 14;:gi B: BRT to Tigard Representative Alignment Options - 4 • 1 _ `.M.-(3t.• lig.. 1 01 1 1001100.100001 IllawilietittiliwiwiseatooKtP1 • Baseline - - .. Prioritized Key Places --------- Alternative Alignments \ Existing Transit i t''' 0 0 5 Other Key Places Miles Streets V Nietro ...] Study Area Southwest Corridor BRT to Tualatin Alignment Options r f W „ E -RD . i '', - ii4 1, 47/ 1 . 4 3/ n B A N Musa/NEED pip 4'.Y, -, . ! H Y //rr�� • - ■ (1° / oar. i 2 . 2 , r RD a \y\,y. .. !k.", / '`r7 •S/j NSETH t l.— v. . ..., ...... - _ _I ....., ¢ RD .SW✓ �.. liu 4 , ikk oN � a j ) ; , "'. SCAN ! - a 40 aket SW 7UAL J it /" GEY HWY ¢� Ova 1 Y , , �� �! ° l m � ��'. G 1 y rt S h.1N D r SW FARN1tN R_ �n w y y 1 y '✓9 LcA E ::. e ..0 r .. R'ONNiL,s, F • i' - ,/. ,1- , SW CAMERON OD G, I W w(ry{w yy � I ,�,� * SW ALLENBL,VD U ° Y Ji p kr ,�+, , a 1 1 ... .P w ` " �j SW HART RD N 77 iS'�fw`. A BLVD 5 - r ,p. t'•je p ° ' ' HOME D .,� '• - *' 1 . ; : j f d , ,p Ik .. - �- PO • J R I d `., "�, ! ' =J 1 u., - - D �O y. ,;w.!"r 00 1,PNYO 43 - ' - BR , OC RAM ST `' - � y TAlYLORS TERR , , j i T t+ y, + ale g MN , , 1 .t .. , c -.. ice � C JG ` CP 17 It I W STEPHENSON " g ' ' IN �. ® P F B - .. t v L y Co le R R ° ,., T ` , � Rc,,% w o99, s 4 ", PES f✓ ? ; e, Ej r y 0 s - ' p y T''o 51 � • -a �'" .' M * d`J °o fj „yr �„ - � r . I !� I W ALN UT� ` D ow � r i T IMBERLINrbR 14 f °r �1 K .wr. Ili �" p ` .•,., J '- @ r 1 MEL ST 0 / E e l /�� .-• tom,. • 0'QY , . tom ._ _ ( ` ' 1 e �P C LB RD Ii * • SW AARDE ST o �M DO ALD , . ,P Q� - i 4 t �/' r /.�. '� � .. BON ate+ : : . ,�.. We §ter ay coot P .. R S � I Y y . O ' R. 9 .0 UN T A ,,,,,VD ._ 4 6 S ILA RD SW BONITA RD .. °t\ 7 a w I r,.. ` F c Fq I r " w.. , ® i ■ ... . \ P Y . l e ' . ... iir lil 1' e ,. ,h N CPP t�t` , *IKE t PVE. 1 r. el 1 3 1 4 AA h k. H ' OP PER OR � � y `LNM'' ° • . `'I !Iv.' GD 7C JGD I p o q- p ✓ _ ' .♦ .--- - f fi Facizam10/ 4‘ P z .4**- y�f iii , 0 Z Z n '. 1 ' �Q < `a cogMcr r w- 1r „ , , r 'It . lags o e el t� .. i T — J { 1 CHILDS . ' I � l y R r O 'rT !Y"P CIFI H.. __ i /' ,I. it - SWOP Cl I - --- °� • ow - lati l 0 SW SAGERT ST/ ® y ten �^ 5 tl Q O P's SW AVERY ST - b y 120`' fV'I . "•�.. I rONa y .,„), . - w ,, = o d ' 3 j' ! s . / J ' tia / Sherwood ko I Z O11 � ■ fa i ' r Q 9 S'J Metro Region \ C: BRT to Tualatin Representative Alignment Options r - • Baseline - .arT Prioritized Key Places --- - - - --- Alternative Alignments Existing Transit Other Key Places 0 0.5 - Miles Streets Stud y Area fl Metro Southwest Corridor BRT to Sherwood Alignment Options � SGNS M a id ¢ "L / . 049-118V*. . �Q ♦. p easeuNEGD qy y . r da f e NNN.E`SIR° «iw�MM'SWI`'�NSE,T���.,. -4. S.C� T � elPU � C Q,�[J RDA .. > :. -.0. . " +.°. i''. + �"I ' . 444 $A . W f= ° "6 ._. - A' .. '� a'i •S VNSEiNw Q ° a � ' sw -- ■ � � . � E8 s * -17— q:: - 0:00 O Q il l 7 `~ Ilk . vwl..' s � r ^ 111''' `. � _ r w UALAT /N. 3 ' V �" .r.r y �i SW it/ALAN, ; - 1P • J O ' y, e Oi 11111.111= ' • i r y 4 r ,-* �y SW UN, .. r � FRMI O N ft0 W I S y1 5 .N 1 • h•wage }i. .,.._ , SW ALLE BLVD U i r A � a Na , 3 - A 2 % (m&. d K , 'iiirt � � : 4 L G 1 - j 4. L . I .. + SW NARi RD - F�i7MULTNOMAH BLVD , Ft7et1' cgoH .ME RIA,, „ fel, k i '4.* ."' 04 0. mar et" 0 ie, ar " €76ROCK s / 43 r w Y . ' fI TF, "1'v OS 1 ,.,_ ¢ I e `g4'N% - L ,GER y . „ . , ,,,, .. , i' , A v. ,' . wr .,„ , al e ,,,, 1 f #y' n ; � C „ � F 3 �C., , p� 9 FFN Q SW STEPHENSON ee FNP N� unity 6 �� aR v d: - y �� `vc, a 4 liee +a ag s s . y - . �H O U7 N 5T F.s ERA'O � ., $ �fr � O � G i (Jr Dew ° )''' ."i�'°i'M i : r r + ' :RD t 71MBERLINORi M L RO S S? - D -.d r ,, vip, � ' " ' ' GAA 'DE ST Q^�M DO A �,, •V �rLP Of 1.1 . � i S � JC'X+ " "; r . .. Y G o , lig �' D uNT: o /N8oro _ { W B NITA RD SW BONITA RD `` 4 I ' I S ' .° H • • 3 . .m pEav „Dm . " , RD y p q _ w. i r r I •1 o 0,e �� O L p 0 m e ;z o .... a r ' : - -• \ n z JEAN RD . Y [7D d. . �, > � _ G - v ° e r m r v ;Brio o . _, , _ TiIN RD - CHILDS RDA s+ � ' ct. 1r lle s SW TUALA J H ' , ! ... ) •m .: `y05 to+ DIFICJ' _ ,� ill SW CO A� 0 PP . QV NV. RG S l3 0 SW SAGER•T S Q�GD BB ., Nk P SW AVERY ST — :‘.- , - , . - , ,,, - - ,, , 11111111 4 ,1 , I' gi .11. „.........„--""-' . - ', 44* ,- ' ',. N70,116 a4.-,: 4i er . 1.11111 E GON N y ^ J � .' O,y 1 Sherwood ■ � � a S� O F � » N % . <: r y 4 U NSET BLVD 'a " N • ^� _ 5 r Metro Region D: BRT to Sherwood Representative Alignment Options y alIMMOND Baseline __ Prioritized Key Places - Alternative Alignments . Existing Transit Other Key Places o 0.5 1 Miles Streets Study Area fl 4,t Metro Southwest Corridor BRT Hub and Spoke Alignment Options I, r . w s` e RO » y .,k i ",. �� me � ��^ - l e o It Nt - - - RN - -' ♦ ,� ar 1 a . L�JBASE(INE W Y . • "S s:. i1 �^ \ a � °� i .. ( , / , y �3 I .. , � y IL + ry= SIR. " " " E,Tr ! ,� S ] � QJC,I°ORD ,0° t SWLsU N S � �. �N AAd y , ,�! � WrtF�� 't ,, 4.0,,,,,„„ „,....., 0. `�' - S SETH SWB• ¢I NPR • O P t . we. ( — r / 4d� r tl grp TUA( N . L q •� F .CA Nr y U t � ^I�' ' 3 1 A fa LL EY HWY � J " I f . tim SW :ARMI�DN RD -.. $�E3 { W `Y' r S Eg VE' RT Ni �n K ON L � �, f a s ; SW C AM E RON N ! .x ... vY W SW SW 0. WS '.. SW ALLENBL,VD * - VV p i „ CC? =OM& r - i e'`, k % is.- tiiii n t w . _ Xc GP l''' E1 . "" � t'J MULTNOMAH BLVO 5 F GS SW . HARIRD ` � - " , �___________�._– ___.__- .. -. i a Qri7HOME RD -.: w R _ ,. I 2 , � 30 ..., /' ....w✓ p5 a� ... P a °° tY' 14,1 ref I 1 4. . . ... 00. 4 �' P y� 5`� ! R 1 t SW B •OCKM N S ' I _ /. a3Y23)LORS �.. e d 43 .,,. T n k.i / '` Q / B . , � .' �. "'. _ x:11 % >i r « �-.� • "R - sr Iii .,rf r \ S� 1 ' y SW STEPHENSONge .. � P �. ��FNe Po k ia � d Co unity.,College R si. a r, w r TIMBERLINE DR .,„ ' �' , ' f�' r I � 'fi , � 40 i' -, .4 .., i 1 1. f .11 410' r j 3.� ' 'TTac° , ± ~ r- 1 O y 49 - ti �, Or Vi � i „, swGaa • DF ,,r:l',S_ ,�7� I '. . � �� q V W Y RO QA�, QM. UNTA /4, 4$4. + . / .. r yA We ter 'a •''\;\ .. 'pUN T : q /N O ' , r - S B ONITA RD - SW BONITA RD 4, _ /•-• . . s / , I t R P � t AP � � y :a C�7i.7 1ST .,.s 4 .� y o } *, 7 p 5 y a r w/ e It � c o ;� m cn L J I 7 ° �° g J t I i , ..- - ( r ( -• " \ \ "" 2 J�0 e { twa ` � / SA „ r` f”' e �! 1, y ! ( e I 6 �Q Y _ W x RL O LG� Il 100".-- pK s V N'N / :7: ^ .,. % CHILDS RDm °`y Y , ,,r�1 pc r W c . -, F7 ." P W 1 e_ °I i de l ". '' _ 1 ` -. la i SW SAGER•T TI . 2 ! P ° .I klV D� ED 4S / 5t ♦Ea �O SW AVERY ST _.N _ �. �� 4 / ,'„„„ Q 12 05 tt�. TC • ''PteAtt'41116-.. , . q) R E ` 3 / i "I 41 ,- ,,,,-- o m ,� 5� 3 1 "ar y i 6 1T n. . ,„ T .; 3 ,_. '� a'i7JONNSQ Sherwo f , , - . +1 < s .' r " ` ` o ? i • ' " " sy 4 Q r. 5 s ' `J n M B UNSET BLVD ? t Metro Region` E: BRT Hub and Spoke Representative Alignment Options rte i1 • Baseline I --- - - - - -- Spokes Prioritized Key Places Existing Transit i`1 Other Key Places 0 °'5 , toles Streets Study Area Metro ,...] GREAT PLACES . Corridor Southwest Corridor Transportation Project Map Book ''.‹...7 / it f f = r ` 4 • - J 1 _ — j _.-,7 A .' ( ...7. ,: . _ -----r- (.._ 4 ,. 5 ... ( i f . .\ ‘ ■,,,, IIIIIP r i _: .. \ c_ I + \--- flr 7 7 0 - \ !,-- - -- i yer , r 7 L II . I . ! „ , .. . , . 6 , -.,. . . ii .. 2..„ `f .‘ ? ' 1 1 0 : L S p _..,..., r I-- / "' - 1 ,_„7,-7 7 i L ; .1 - 011, iii '- I tillhir ' . . .:- . il ,' , i I / Tv - - -- 1 l-1 Miles 1 1 I I Map Book Sections Data Collection Area __ , Urban Growth Boundary .. 0 .5 1 J , \ l i t rO N February 5, 2013 I ANIL 1iiil Ow, saw. pe... -- _ - -, - mark" .— ___ ° Corr idor w �' 1 Transportation Projects - Section 1 E C OUCH ST y _ ', ��1 WBURNSIDE ST N II i J4flNSIOESr ' ii, +‘,' , , ' - . it*, ' , - 9 9/y Y� ° w \v _ , �{' Q �O E R y . r N S r = SE STARK ST C t : ( sw �o J sr :. ., e C b � C U2jB 40 , 1/ - --"--- - =-1‘ ,, Cen Cit PSU y O L h fy s y,, yq v� .a r�L ._ ' c, ,��53 ti r 4:: R KEr J I c ' 0�0 e 'T b J 1 S� . - _ 6,022 3 . h w w M I 4 N `""� • • 6022 1 sF M `I 617'C ; 'fr.... � � 6 022 I � o ryJ t � s 6022 x • z � 1 � 028 � w B s $ d - 7 : .. f OAD� t � O I I Z ' S -1- 2007 II R e / r -r 202517.1 ` F . rf �c � i 3038 I p . ( r v { T OHSU SOW • f , ,t. / - � , OHSU ; ° 2. 1 ' l :Ii - ' 9 J ul m } I m Hamilton 20 m 4� _ . � �,a � y � g A� 1 , •'T' �"-� DA ��¢ W • _ = Bicycl •• G ,n ME Commercial Essential 0 0 2 0.5 N • _ Bike /Pail a a Urban Growth Boundary , , y In N Miles ��siork v o I - h,,i Q . E mployment d Priority CD d Parks *� • O • _ d I • Mixed U Y o ! Opportunity I � f Metro a _a Auto/ Freight a v Neighborhood Data Collection Area N V -_ Multimodal HD Residential g February 5,2013 Section 1 Roadwa Pro - HCT Project Bundles Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title istimated Cos Primary Mode LRT Tigard BRT Tigard BRT Tualatin ' BRTShe,INOOd Hub& •• ke Portland. Tigard, ODOT 1013 I -S: Active Traff ic Management $3,000,000 Auto/ Freight X Portland. 0005 1044 South Portland Circulation and Connectivity 522,000,000 Auto / Freight X - _ X _ Portland, ODOT 4002 Barber Blvd, SW( 3rd. - Terwilliger /:Multi-modal Improvements 06,594,100 Multimadal X X X _ Portland 5013 Naito /South Portland Improvements (left turn pockets with bike /pad and remove $39,695,079 Multimodal X tunnel, ramps and viaduct/ • Active Transportation Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Pr roojeet Title Estimated Coat Primary Mode LRT Tigard BRT TI rd Tueledn ROT Sherwood Hub & Spoke Portland 2007 Arthur Street Connobtion and Steps $ strlan�.r X ".. BRT % X Portland 2012 Gainer Street Pedestrian Bridge 015,000,000 Pedestrian X X X K % Portland 2025 Naito Pedestrian Crossing at Porter St, $1,100,000 Pedestrian X X X X X Portland 2028 Ramp Crossing of Kelly Ave. to Naito Parkway Northbound 5390,000 Pedestrian X X X X X Portland 2069 99W pedestrian improvements to serve Gibbs transit stops, . ® ,000 PedenMan X X X X X Portland 3025 INNER HAMILTON -from SW Terwilliger Blvd to SW Corbett Ave. Bikeway 59,000 Bi -ydle X % % % % Portland 3038 LOWER SW let -from SW Barber Blvd to SW Arthur St. Bikeway $219,000 Bicycle X X X X X Portland 3093 TERWILLIGER GAPS'. Bikeway $296,000 Bicycle % % % X X Portland 3094 UPPER 880800 -from SW Capitol Hwy to SW Sherman St. bikeway $1.821,000 Bicycle X X X X X Portland 6021 Hamilton Street to South Portal Pedestrian /Bicycle Connection $1,000,000 Bike /Ped X _ _ Portland 6022 1 -405 Crossing Ped /Bike Improvements $5,000,000 Bike /Ped X X X X X °Corridor Transportation Projects - Section 2 N 1 � (.^ .. L m.(y .1 W - - . O F C it r 9 r r \/ M w . 0 .t , S N 1s 1` 11 u"6� — E'P ; r y�(j,�y� F6 -\_( y' ti ; ---------- i 4 �; `: ; k r � ,� 1028 � _ 94s o 2074 '. : '1 '-••• ; 2072 0 ,.+ • "lara1+, OITSD .SW. TNOMAH:arvo� � - !• ��• / y b c� is 3050 / ,. 4 . F� � 2073 t -, ° r - 044r —� i•� t ... 6 i ^ + , 2030 0L O + . J » 06 2 J 6 03 4j,p e Y 0 , as *, ,,,, / 2002 n , 3 �� C w ® Commercial Essential ' ..""u o mmercasseni H d Bik /Pee 1„...1 0 0. 25 0.5 y y Urban Growth Boundary Miles v Q C Employment >, al Priority m _ 5007 d Parks a A • �G y r Mixed Use Y a Opportunity \ ��' Num a .Q Auto/ Freight > Data Collection Area Vet t() 1.7711111 a w HD R4Qidential Neighborhood F,,,,,. Multimodal 13 Section 2 Roadway Projects PCT Protect Tiers Jurisdiction Protect ID Protect Title Estknated Cost Prlmery Mode MT Tiprd BRT Tiprd BRT Tualatin BRT Sherwood Hub &Spoke Barborkoad Drat Capfolto Il „ r( taduce nartpbaond fides from three to two Por "Pi IT 2,19 ' wihmoui- momknprmnment* $350,000' 'Aero(Pe _'' _ x x % erg a I Portland, 01107 4002 aarRBr gl4SW Old. Ta"9#riarl: Ffykfoaedat lmprWamatAS $6:694,100 MWBmodet - X x % - X. 1 Portland, OPclT 5006, - Barbuttarte Dlet:Tarwlnyerto Capitol $250030 r. , Ium. .. , 1.,1 x x x Portland 5009. CapIal Hwy Improvements Oa* c o roadwop and add sidawelks) 514d00,000 MoMmodal': X%. - - - Active Transportation Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Protect Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LRTTIprd BRT Tigard BRTTueletin BRT Sherwood Hub &Spoke Portland 2C04 Me,SW. oPtP rdars• T+RleersParry$ Pedestrian Improvements $354000 :Padesnien A x x x x - Formed - 2030 SprirdGard•n SW( TaHara 26th):Peides*rlon $450,000:. Padetttian X x 2 X x Porgmtd 3tt72” - HlbdatexaddBkxt :ofamtshya an Barb - $25D,DDD Palos . X 5 x - x. x Portland 2074 HilkakokiatOSSingiMpiaproleritatilartastMerthe : $AW,mo Psd.f#Jan x 0 x x x r rrl:.„n 3028 g3H0R HAtMMKNN+ nom SWTeiwtIgpr Biwd SW,CorbattAoe. BRcaway $9100 VW* X - x x X x I Portland 3044. MleiptEIARBUR SW HwySarburtod:Blkeway $1.650,090 Not X x.: x Portland x009,.. ' : .`Spdktennaan SlrbpaylonF any` Capaolllaar) :BRUaoy '$4,165,000 Mon* x' 6 x x x 1111111111111•111=111M 1 ParGand - . 0494: - [ 49Aetx4R omsWCapltolkiwytoswsttemmanse. bikeway $1.924100 Blade x .x.: X: x x I Porttamo ,I .I k0s'al��� s,ndnadsn695nsadxti ..', 51, x4S &n -, :.4 _ x: x 0 footte,t. otO,P :.... . 6005 V ermont rradwetbladeatdpedestrtantadixt s $5;103.124 Blka/Ped _ _ x: It X F.,nl,rn .ViS Fapµo ispk&ragnway OW blectdr)Trak . $17,653,000: Trail XX X x x SW 7,, Transportation Projects - Section 3 qt fi v. ra .W DENNEY RD ,Iiii w a, y ' , 4-m '• ' x qo 81x,.' B.P"A - 1 1 u6ii'. p f FIGh�Gf T I g ,' d a. f �... «, • i y : r f 4, Fj e. . i ' ." ,, - .), , ,.. , , / , , _ Jr f 44 , r�` kg `^' x i 6047 g1Nashingto Square i p, . I- "II .„ A r I i ' . ;:, 111111 i '? co. , 21_ f"' ,. 7 Wa Sq Wei cr.' .. Ek r` - .. �t °`� Lower aSi e r �' � � Lo W .M I 'I Y S j� i J • Bicycle L-. _ Commercial Essential �' �� 0 0.75 0.5 N y • C3tE3 0 y w - - - - N ...., Urban Growth Boundary Miles '-'4'••••,-/.... _ ti c -13 • _ , Q . C Employment > d Priority __ , d m t Parks ■� C 2 • ---- m ■ Mixed Use Opportunity a .0 Auto/ Freight > Data Collection Area V. V V HD Residential Neighborhood February 5 2013 Multimodal Roadway Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LRT Tigard BRT Tigard BRT Tualatin BRT Sherwood Hub & Spoke Tigard, Beaverton 1156 Scholia Ferry Rd. ATMS 51,109 0 to/ Freight X X X 00 X X Active Transportation Projects Tom j mai Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LET Tigard BRT Tigard BRT Tualatin BET Sherwood Rub & Spoke Tigard, Beaverton 6047 Washington Square Regional Center Highway 217 Pedestrian /Bike Over Crossing $3,70,000 Bike /Ped X % 0 X O Corridor Transportation Pro - Section 4 sN l 0 ' r r , � 54'✓ DENNFY RD 4 141 ' - I • ' SW MUI TNOMAH.BLVD .w' :.. �; � � 3050 o -_ - `.a ai ARDENH RD �/ , , q- - .� d cP v yp v < ° .. / 6047 i VONEW0000,—*1....' ' X ... i 4 , / r /^ ^ / 5007 _ Q I „..i. ez ewN Y • — Bicycle +' # C N ® Commercial Essential ,” ' ', 0 0.25 0 5 ' N m • r y y N ,!.., Urban Growth Boundary Miles �~ t C A I Q C Employment > m Priority i$ d aJ Parks TB O • P edestrian 0 a , ® Mixed Use R O pportunity \ � � � L d +• o. 1 �'1ctrC> Wm 0 - St Auto/ Freight D ata Collection Area February 5.2011 L �� Multimodal U HD Residential Neighborhood Roadway Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LRT Tigard BRT Tigard BRT Tualatin BRT Sherwood Hub & Spoke Portland. Tigard, ODOT 1013 I -S: Active Traffic Management $3,000lito/ Freight X % % % % Tigard, Beaverton 1156 5cholls Ferry Rd. ATMS 51.109 000 Auto/ Freight X X x X X Portland. ODOT BOOS. Barbur Blvd, SW (Terwilliger -City Umits)'Multi -modal Improvements $24,833.100 Multimodai X X X _ % Portland. COOT 5007 Barbur Signals (add signalized intersections) 31,000 0H0 Multimodai .. _ X X X Tigard. Beaverton, ODOT, Washington 5037 Hall Boulevard Widening, Oleson to 99W $3.500,000 Multimodai _ % X _ Co. Active Transportation Projects Ht.7 Bun. Illikt Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LRT Tigard BOO Tigard BRTTuSMb1 I SRI Sherwood .Hub &Spoke PortlRd) - -. :2027 Pedestrian Overpass near Markham School 54,561395 Pedestrian X X Tigard 2090 Hall 1100 Pedestrian lnfill S2,000,000 Pedestran X X % a k Portland Bea erton 3050 MULTNOMAH -from SW Oleson Rd to SW Terwilliger Blvd. Bikeway $3,466,000 Bicycle X X X X X Portland 6034 Taylors Ferry ,SW(Capitol Hwy City Limits(. BiWde & Pedestrian lmpr0vements 04, '_i09, OOH Eli 0 /Ped x X x X % Tigard. Beaverton 6047 Washington Square Regional Canter Highway 217 Pedestrian/Bike Over Crossing 03.700,000 Bike /Ped X Roadway Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LRT Tigard BRT Tigard BRT Tualatin BRT Sherwood Hub & Spoke 1013 I-5: $3,000.001.111116 E X milk x J 0 Portland; COOT 101o Barbur Road Diet- Capitol to Hamilton (reduce nOrtirbound lanes from three to two 0230.000 AROO/ F03860 X % X �`t��,,,�y''r�, with multi -modal improvements] — land OD OT 1037 Sjjjjjj� and I -5 Partial Split Spring Garden Interchange (inolu. sting SB 1S79,900,000 Auto _ arM NB en I ramps) Portland, 0000 5005 Bator BNd, SW (Terwilliger - City Lentil Multi -modal Imptooements 524.333,100 Multimodal % X X _ X Portland, ODOT • Portland, 5006 ji_�ne Piet:Terwlllig 11,5250,000 Multimodal � __ — Portland, Whir 0007 5007 Whir Siren /add intersections) $1,800000 _ X X X Mu " .'11 1111111 _ Portland 5009 C.pltolHwy Improvements fr l roadway end add sidewalks) $19,100,000 Multimodal 0 _ _ — _ ultlmodal Portland, ODOT 5059 SW Portland/ CossreaMMdHimodei Project (roadway ndWrnents and $40. witimod.l X modifications to Barber Blvd. Capitol Hey., and the l-5 sow n hboundon -mpl — — _ — Active Transportation Projects HCT Project Bundles Jurisdiction Project ID Projserm. Estimated Cost Primary Mod. LOT Tigard BRTTig.rd BRT Tualatin BRT Sherwood Hub Meek* Portland -, 2004 lam - Tedert Portland 1011 SW Tayfers Fen/ rood to Barbur Steps at Transit Center $50,000 P.dasMan X X X X ■ X "" d111111111011 "" d111111111011 wSh Portland 2018 HubeetS ane On:00T37th Ave.- 43rd Ave./1-5 $300,C00 Padub4n X. X X X I 'MEIN Portland 2033 W.stPortland Torn Canter: Pedestrian Improvements $5,775,000 Pedmtian X X X X X Pon I Portland 6006 Salmi. pathways $1,000,000 Rlke /P.d 3 X X X X Portland Lake Oswego 600$ 35th Ave, SW (Taylors Ferry - Stephenson): Icy a ec awes leo mprovementi I i � Portland 6013 Barbur /PCC Bikeway Connection $250,000 11ke/Ped X X X X X 6026 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIL1Peernents (35th to Barbur i __ Portland 6034 Taylors Paeny, SW (Capitol Hey - CRyLnes): B Pedestrian improvements $4,209,000 Bike/Ped 0 411111111•1111111111111=11111011 ., °Corridor Transportation Projects - Section 6 . .ft J .n �RRY � � _ y ia.1iT Murry' holly _ - .,r'. e d I a '�' . N a" • i .ERs .,"— `4 Y. r ° �M .. b/ / ' . ' , '-. ..'r , ft A 4..,... 4. r, N r i .;c+.scmv mid t 3�i7 WA NUTFTtp L , . r . l , ' , - 4 I " r 94" w • -• . 1 v y ♦ d . : 4 r 1 — ate CH∎ D 0 ,, • Bicycle 4.. Commercial Essential "'. 0 0.75 0 5 d • Bike /Pe <] a a ti ,:::• Urban Growth Boundary Mm es ''` ` in N .. t C R ;t fl G Employmen > d Priority C • _ d Parks N L y+ Mixed Use a Opportunity a ('I lc'tt'> a _a Auto/ Freight > Multimodal Data Collection Area V HD Residential Neighborhood Fehmary'i 1077 �, 1 Roadway Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LRT Tigard BRT Tigard BRTTUalaen 9RT Sherwood Hub &Spoke % Tigard, 8eavertar( 3.156 Stholls Fern Rd ATMS $1,109,000 .Auto / Freight X X X X Corridor T Proj - S ection 7 T �. tY1j ,; , - ,057 1 r, + 1 � � �W pp' 0, , ° h on .... 1113 o \, } iss i . 9092 r' � : i P J�tib ` � i'� 1, g .., OS V•4•411M P � \ 26 4 0 } c r *--1, Al. - ...I t , , --- • ' ` -' 0 ,- i t s wo e rn; • - lit i ! i �� 491 •� zoso'I � \ �` I _ ,., : . 4 y �' r g: 2078 ,i ,,-� �I i, �� ! t 2076 • 5 , .9 i ' I„ o Trian r k i f � , 2066 S r I I ! / ‘. ,Illrll°P i' I aard South N. w ' • i a M d V7 P • ! .' ' e ' ,: , „ i „,,, .: . _ . _ , .,,,,,,, , : ._ , , „ .,. , . ,. . .. . .. .:, . . t,, ..r. .„ . .... N. ° z =, - r 5039 • . car r - � 'i w CP 3.121 4411_ 4mi G Ltu� �� _ _ 1., '.F ..�ws ! .. _'-__ _ _- _ £tONtT • HU • -- � e ' ° P', , soot '� s _ • = = Btcyele C w Commercial Essential �� - �. 0 0.25 05 y • a y ® i� 1 Urban Growth Boundary �` a Mies 4 O • -� ;t, fl . p E mployment >, d Priority IIM ix. e p Parks 2 • y r Mixed Use v 'a l' Opportunity k,c'YCfs a U .0 Auto/ Freight > D C Area 1 Multimodal D i HD Residential Neighborhood 000 ary 5 , 2013 Sect1+ , I Roadway Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LOT Tipyd BRT Tigard BRT Tualatin BRT Sherwood Hub &Spoke • -. P 13..II` _IPIIIIIIIIII i nl,,, Tigard, SONM , : IsilS Hwy ...Vi. Portland to SW 124th :50000 A*$ /lrc;ght X X X X X Tigard 1378 Atlanta Street Extension (new roadway) $9;800000 AUtoI Fruit x X. X x x Tigard, Washington Co.. 1100 Hall /Honxiker(SWFtkrs MUysectton8.otlr -inert. $5,000,30 Auto / Freight x X X R X - .Tigard 1111 oak,{Jncoln•Locu54;5treet CoilectorSystem(ConnectMty Improvements) $1,000,900 Auto, Freight X Tigard,ODOT 1114 Htghway99W/ 68th. Ave (intersection improvements) $1,000,003 Auto/Freight 9 x x x 1111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111 Highway 9 ?W ac Tigard, ODOT 1149 HWy217/72nd Ave. inert: »o,c.-. ms (reconstruction w/adtled memo $37,000,000 Auto /Fr )st X 111111111111111 r - OW Lirilik 411111111111111111111111111111111111 MI Ttprd 5024 69th Avenue (widen to Blanes) $13,509,000 Mutttmodal X X X x X te a® ■�■ Tigard, Washington Co. Hoag 7211d AVOWS Wade WgIOSWtoffun;il $6,o3D, 09 ' m'. ",al _ 7t X X — OEM 1111111.1111111111.111111 .1111111111111111111 Tigard, Washington Co. 5036. Hal Boulevard Widening,Mi3onald4teeetto Fame Creek Including creek bridge $12,500,000 Muittmodat _ X x INVIIIIIIIIIIIIMIM Tigard, Washington Co. 9009 Meponaid StreetWkkxmg, 99W to Hat $8,000,0110 Muhknodil X. * Active Transportation Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LRT Tigard BRT Tigard BRT Tualatin BRT Sherwood Hub &Spoke ANEW L4. 11111.11111111.111 x �� 111111.101111111.11111.11 ,i.:xd -'x,44 Lamm A+4Seruef'hdowota $110!,000 P.40.0541 a X x X. X - Tigard � ® —�. �_ IIIIIIII ilea:,.. 2050 iiwsttlter'StMetSidewalks $040,000 Pedestrian X X X x x JIMIIMMIIIIIIFIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII rovemen ® _� Tigard 2r,16 ' Ttoti+•A Transit Cerder 99Wadswa &tfll $500000 Pedestrian x '.X 0 X X Turd T t en[eY n Thlitark 2078 \ced r:r Hatt rooerFa!k &RidnpedeOrtanpath. $10i.W00 Pedestrian 0 It x X x Tiped 20hO TliersiTransttrAnter Sidewalk WM. $100000 Pedestrian X X X % X ._445 084900 mast .,n,, ti , .,„enr $4,571,313 ekyd* x 0 X x x igard, TH a la tin 11.11 111111111111111111111. 111 72nd Avenue Bi.eway 111111111111111 i Tlg, H. Lai - ",,, =e;• }121 e eirs PcsIBBaway $200,900 Bicycle :X 'X. X Portland Tigard =14_111111.ftP iflc Hvy -PD 1 riz 3'19; ' ,, .:., ' .,:enter Blot Rub $23000. Bicycle X x X X X Lake Oswego Inger /IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIII.MMIIIIMIIIIIII A114 Pane Creek Trait- 10foot wide paved trail $3,000;000 Trail X X X x x 1 Timm. 9042 Tigard Street trail eormaction $200,000 Trail _ x _ X 111111111111111111 once din'Py11 1111111111111111111111 __® orridor Transportation Projects - Secti 8 .,1„,s, :11—;,,,, \ si.-"::::-T:f4lik\. +,m ,, ^ fi r r 1 � Mb1 i G4 Q�E G' <us µ 1 # d - a. _ G . . ., � N + I i • $ ' t. r "I. I Eastern Kruse Way ° s' k • , 1 II WBONIT HO . _ � i h / moo ► s ' - / ' .... • e. f / r 00 „ , ,. . ,..,,,,,...„...:„.„ . f as et C vl ® Commercial "'. 07 5 �.5 w d • = - Rik - /P-0 d a .� - - , Urban Growth Boundary M Essential . es t G a E .: Employment A m Priority 0. O • -� Gh y _ d Parks • y F Mixed Use Y a Opportunity l:tro O a .Q Auto/ Freight V Neighborhood Data Collection Area -' ate • Multimodal 0 _i HD Residential Roadway Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LOT Tigard BRT Tigard BRTTueletln BRT Sherwood Hub &Spoke ..rs.'.,.a '_'nr ._ " - ; -'. Carman Dr. Improvements (widen to 3 lanes w /bike 29 Multimodal ^� '� Lake Oswego 5004 Boones Ferry Road Boulevard improvements (turn lanes with bike/pd _( Madrona 532,000,000 Multimodal X to Kruse Way) Active Transportation Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cest Prhnwy Mode LRT Tigard SRI Tigard SRI Tualatin , BRT Sherwood Hub &Spoke Lake ewega 3 - � — Iron Mountian/ Upper Drive bike lanes e' - "+l _ _ _ X Lake Oswego 6001 Bonita Rd. - Carman Dr to Bangy Rd sidewalks and bile lanes 5300,000 Bike /Ped X X X _ X Lake Oswego 6002 Carmen Dr. sidewalks and bike lanes 111111111Fike/Ped _ x x _ x Lake Oswego 6016 Boone; Ferry Rd bike Lanes (Country Club to northern City Lends) 50,011,130 Bike /Ped X _ X stn Lake Oswego 9024 Kruse Way Path $5,000,000 Trail k X X _ X Lake Oswego 9025 Surf to Turf Trail connects Fanno Creek Trail and the TOnquin Trail 55,000,000 Trail _ _ X _ X O Corridor Transportation Projects - Section 9 a.. 7.: - f v ° N g . _ , . e { i i ...d. . a i w r ,,,'. ' •M > " • � I /'. ` 'O E A M V .„ _ - ; . 1 i w°. « 1 ° 1l , I ,f/ R ( ' 1 i M .. } Y ° « , . . - �,�, ja r 3 _4. s « p , _ �. �JS" - at F Ili 1: sok* d _ ,,- , , ,,, ^ , . „ ,,,,,,, MI 17 IN PO .. ,wi11 mi Il _ • , :_ Bic. cl • « i in a • 4 a Commercial Essential ,, � "ii Urban Growth Boundary 0 025 0.5 �` ` ; ° N Miles !� �i C _ 0. C ® Employment >, a Priority � �� ' 0 d Parks C • -- d Mi U '' Opportunity \ � � 1_ ›, ai d . � • , 1 A1CY'C(7 _ R f 0 .12 Auto/ Freight HD Residential g D Collection Area Fer, °Y S.so, ` z ,� d V Neighborhood N Multimodal Roadway Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Project Tide Estimated Cost Primary Mod. I RTTIBrd Milliard BRTTwlatln I aRT Sherwood Hub &Spoke Portland, Tigard, Tualatin, 5her0OAR W qrif igr 1 Hwy 99WTSMO:6 0 riland [ STN 124th ", "_� q '` '' ODO7 Active Transportation Projects Project Bundles Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Primer/ Mode LRT Tigard BRT Tigard ORT Tualatin BRT Shammed Hub &Spoke King City 2001 King City Town Center Pedestrian Improvements 111111P00,000 Pedestrian X X X X X Tigard 2070 99W pedestrian improvements to serve King City transit stops $200,000 Pedestrian X X X X X Portland Tigard 3128 Pacific Hwy -99W the Lanes 000 Bicycle X X X X X Tigard. Tualatin 9023 Tualatin River Pathway 58.600,000 Trail X _ X X _ Tualatin 9059 9900 Parallel Path $500000 Troll _ _ _ _ X I Tualatin 9061 Wertside Trail 55,000,000 Trail X _ X -:'- King City; Washington Co. 9999 131st Ave and Fischer Road sidewalk infill and bike lanes 5500,000 Bike X X X X X corridor Transportation Projects - Section 10 f 'I 'w , a , ‹.- d F � c N % / e . I ake` ' ° c 5 ) ` • ( OD o I / e /3op' �. 1 e \ j I i 1 "" ,. �{ $ I � r{ t it e ' m �� ,. fain. r :. � ' t . • 6049 1 . 6 s -- �. a f m "tea=.. d ' A .0„,,,,, 1 F RR Y • Bicycle +' • i. to Commercial Essential . "'1 0 0.75 OS v , d • Bik - /P• ] a a .. .I Urban Growth Boundary IMIIIIIIIIIIO Miles ` ; ' v C • _ Employment �, d Priority �_. W 0 d � _. Pa C .g • —" d Mixed Use M R Opportunity - ' a. d r d "•mil A L tl o o. 12 Auto/ Freight y U HD Residential Neighborhood Data Collection Area N ��� � ----_ Multimodal 0 - - -- Section 10 Roadway Projects HCT Protect Bundles Jurisdiction Project ID Pro /act Title Estimated Coat Primary Mode LRT Tigard BRT Tigard BHT Twiedn BRT Sherwood Hub & Spoke Tigard, Washington Co, 1098 Hall Boulevard W1 ETi' Fg�fOrita Road to Durham $3,000,000 Auto / Freightni "" - Tigard, Washington Co. 1121 Upper Boones Ferry at 72nd and Durham Intersection Improvements ( reconitgure) 511,630,000 Auto / Freight _ X X _ _ Tualatin, Washington Co. 1134 Boones Ferry Road)reconstuct /widen from Martinazzi to Lower Boones Ferry) $12,300,000 Auto/ Freight _ _ X X % Lake Oswego 5003 Carman Dr. Improvements (widen to S lanes w /biie lanes) 58,979,923 Multimodal X X Boones Ferry Road Boulevard improvements (turn lanes with bike /pod. • Madrona Lake Oswego 5004 to Kruse Way) $32.000,004ultfmodai X. Tigard, Washington Co 5027 72nd Ave_ Widening: Hunxiker to Durham (widen to 3 or 5lanes) $14008.000 Multimodal _ - _ X Tualatin 5048 Herman ) multi -moda) Improvements, Teton to Tualatin Rd.) $2,500,0007. `al _ X X - Tualatin. ODOT 10088 I -5 Northbound - Lower Bonner Ferry exit ramp )add a lane) 51,500,000 Auto/ Freight X X X X X I- 55outhbound - Auxiliary lane Lower Boones Ferry exit ramp to Lower Boones Ferry k i Tualatin, ODOT 30038 57,500,000 Auto/ Freight _ X entrance ramp, Active Transportation Projects BCT Project Burritos Jurisdiction Project 10 Project Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LRT Tigard BRT Tigard BUT Tualatin PRTSberwood Hub &Spoke Tigard 2046 72nd Avenue. Sidewalks $800,000 Pedestrian X X Tigard 2057 Hall Boulevard Sidewalks 51,800,000 Pedestrian X X X X X Tigard 2090 Hall Blvd Pedestrian Infill $2,000,000 Pedestrian X X X X X Lake Oswego 3003 Iron Mountian/ Upper Opus bike lanes 557 000,000 Bicycle _ _ _ _ X Tigard, Tualatin 3117 72nd Avenue Bikeway $2,000,000 Bicycle X X X X X Lake Oswego 6002 Carmen Dr sidewalks and b lane; 5790 000 Bike /Pod _ X X _ % Durham 6049 Boones Ferry Sidewalks 510,000 Bike /Ped X X X X X Tigard, Tualatin 9003 Tualatin River Pathway 5.0,6rh:J00 Trail X _ X X _ Lake Oswego 9025 Surf to Turf Trail connects Fenno Creek Trail and the Tenquin Trail $5,000,000 Trail _ _ X _ X SW ": -ir �. Transportation Projects - Section 11 r - i , .... . '.r. / 1 t c 7 / ow tot I 1, a 1 , et , ..• � OpO ` ` I . ..QI r / ell i • .. - ��,, >' ��` Sherwood Employment Q 1 f -- / F { ' �.t .. u t.ti. - _ ` IP . . 4 5020 �` €i;om c, 0 TM .,,, .. . , .„ -10 ' Downtown Sherwood , . i ' / t ': i r '"I ' 411/1 i , r \. ,,\ ,_...._ ...; k ,91 �L ,t. °, ,4 ` s E a i CSomttterc Essential �• • •� Urban Growth Boundary 0 0.25 i]:5 N co 0 ' Rike.1P N ■•• r Miles 4locus,. y S # =cm s a ` 0 Emplo >■ 0 Priority O Z � • — a+ Y =� O ortunit Parks M pi s auk O L _ y .+ Mixed Use a PP y Metro • min a • Auto/ Freight > Data Collec A rea ,_ w' U HO Residential Neighborhood N Few�aye.zara NM Multimodal a, Roadfx5y Project6 -t, Jurisdiction Project ID Project TM. Estimated Coss Primary Mode LIT Tigard BRT Tigard BRT Tualatin BRT Sherwood Hub & Spoke Sherwood 106$ To CetuterStgnal & intersesNkmknWaveMante MOxsltown$herwood) .$2.5124000 ; AUta/ieatght X: X X X X _ 502 - Orefor+TonpWR Interne:4 m &Str*etlt0Pmemm6 $1,945.000 Mrlklmedol _ _ - _ X � _ X Tualatin 5049 Hermon( muiM- modetlmprmnments,Cipole to 124th) $4,100,000 MuRkmodal _ x X _ Active Transportation Projects W IRIffirr ' . = 1""I' 1 1111 Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Prtmery Mode IRTTlgard BRT Tigard BRT50.1.Mn BRT Sherwood Hub &Spoke Sherwwd 6042 98W - Sherwood ICBM/de/Ped. Midges.. 913,390000 5&e/red X X X X X Stmtwood 9027 Cod4r Croak Trsf $500,000 Trot - _ _ X X T.Ortih .9059.. :9969 Pavane} Patti $500,000 Trail _ - _ _ X sw ; : -i igr,,, Transportation Projects - Section 12 ,,z. .Sy 9023 •� s _ 90 3 ]tt iF - - `* y; _ 2083 ( 44( r l 7 . . 7 7 7 �, ay" u, 50110 W i v r +Eawoc' �t Meridi P a g _y,R A, , RrW1R1 AND RD g, 205, _ ,,,,,,, 7 h ,* 1 . 0 . „..--- ----------- .4 --- r` t cs p w r A r : r! 00�r ! I t tw 4 k. is • — Bicycle +' C N ® Commercial Essential .� �. 0 0.'S 0.5 N d • • Bile-/P-ii ii CO d .: : :. Urban Growth Boundary 0. 0 't 7 a E -- Employment >, d Priority vies or i O • �= Pedestrian 0 Cr R Parks L —y s Mixed Use p, Opportunity il4Cl {y �� a _a Auto/ Freight > Data Collection Area a R U HD Residential Neighborhood N February 4 2073 Multimodal 0 1------- Section 12 Roadway Projects Ha Project Bundles Jurisdiction Protect ID Project Tltie Estimated Cost Primary Mode LRTTIprd BRT nerd BRTTwINin I SRI Sherwood Hub &Spoke Tualatin, Washington Co. .1135 Booties Perry (iMerWnnect4 signals south of TS Road) $78,000 Auto / Freight X ,r--- - k k ' $2600Q050 Auto /Freight _ X X Tualatin 504$ Herman (multi -modal Improvements, Teton to Tualatin Rd.) 52,500.000 Multimodal _ X X _ - Active Transportation Projects HCT Proje t S t ' Jurisdiction Project ID Project Title Estimated Cost Primary Mode LRTTlprd BRT Tlprd BRTTwlaen ! BRT Sherwood Hub &Spoke Tigard, Tualatin 9023 Tualatin Weer Pathway $8,600,000 Trail X c....,. Troll X X X X Tualatin 9066 North /South 1-5 Parallel Path $9,000,000 Trail _ _ X - - 0 Coriith*-: . Transportation Projects - Section 13 ! ,,,,,t, ! .., t : " • 161"21111.111 :.i it ;.: . t: - _ ••-• ■ - i / / W BO u`- / - ' --, --•-- T - - 0111.1.11r -- .- .. , , - . . ' - _ , ,e. ,.., -,- 0,4 ,,,Z , 11. - . b ••• ,... Tt, . i '.1 • 1 e ' 0: L.) 6. , .;, ii , p 1 l ..,i ni3 05 " / . , ,, i " • ,,,..t / i Sherwood Emplo) / _ , t,„,.. .._ I.: „ . ,,,,,,,,, 0-4,. ik ,o_ ',... ‘,.. . .902,,, _ .... _ , , . .......... ... ......,.,,..„,..,..,,,:.."... .., . ,..... 4 ,- • '''/ „A , , ..' " .'' ' i'Cliy.—.,....::: - '';" . .".... "::::: il ••••••• 5020 ‘ , ,....... ...... .1 4 ' .„ ....... , • ... . '. . . . . :. • " , 1 A 0 \\ ‘ ONII,Oly SF 2, • 1:: - • • r It aki •-01' 1••• • •••T "•-■ ••• L •• • _ :, •-•!. • ,,- : ::, :•., • no; :v..; ;; ':•: : : ..t. . • , 3 r" , , — .... •'.......! '' i ; ..4 • . • . , - . • ',4 ft '' I ' . 63431111111164 Downtown Sherwood ,,,.- ••■• •— . . - - . i ; •• ' ': ..-•'.• - ' ..... 1 - i • . i I ! .. .. ;•.:: . ., "(/(-- • - i—.......... ; 1, Izr:::1'.: •1' . - ".1 `-- • . , . . , -. • : - . r . / .... . %- #:)... , . , : : ..; j • ‘ • / . \% 1..4=0, . , ,... •... , . • - - -:. i. = . fIERZT * " i itr -...4 1 .! 7" - ' . •;. - ....•:,0 . 1 •,:.....,. ,„ ., Illr . ,"" ' '.. ...,..!.....,*.: !. . . ' • ''''‘' " ell:. ‘ : ....." ' '-'.'. , .: :: it "--- :: ..... ....,,,. ,..- ,..:-.-- ......:"..---...--, y ..-. 1 4 P, 1 ' " I s ° • • • , i"*. • 2 1 .., . ";,..,.. ' • -..... IIV a ,, ' 4. re: 4.:: a .... ........ :r.. , ; ...... ..,. r ri.r 1 ; i.:..........4 .• . i., : . . ,, 1 :: t ,'d .: ..' - ' ..t .. '• f - .." - , \'',.. , r "S' V. ...- ., ..v.-..... , ,In. , L,'1,,L, r/ viL • ,,... ,. _,,,,„„. 4 ,,, , ., . ''. e : ' . ; ' . ; ' ie:% . '',' : p , / 04 L ,:‘.:,,,.., - . • , „ ; ,;..,..--yr ; _,,,.. . '•••, ••.,,..... f_ _ _ ••-_, •., -, , , .a• a _ 1 r` i 1: •••• • • 4 4... -* :' ; 4' r*" •••••• ' - 1 .1 .,..:.... , :'. ; /....::"! : - •■ ' r ..; ; :1 Ir..% • 1 , 7 ; -. 1.2 ei r:re , .•'..01- II 1 ......, : _.," - :'7,,,.".._":..:- ,--- - - . .- . ' . . . ' :•; ,:: :, ::. .; : , i . 11 ....: .. t t t ,,,,, .., 11. • :. "P4:!MI . .....' • . ' • • • 'O . ' . . ft # . : 13 10 i " I • O e. 70;:o. " 7.0 ,4 A . . I ! -, .--•• - ' --.; -„, . - r roll -, 499 9 •:. : .....,:t.• 9; 1 i. :•• ::2 7 . • • : ,••••• 3 : , ,,i1 as99.•.. } . • " • • I I / . . • ' . - . , , - . .. ,„.. . . , • . a a 11 ' . • a • . , I a - Wet:2=MM' .. • ' p• - . a ' ' '.. • - 1 . - .......-..--,..' .. ---: -. - '" . • -'' _MBIffealIZEZT 1 .1. i . ■ i - -)- ..... ---- - - - , , • - 46 • . - . • • - 11 • • '•-''. BiCleie 4 C til II. Commercial Essential ." "2 0 0.25 0.5 0 a • - •'' - Cffy4fti] cu w ....I Urban Growth Boundary 111■111111111■1 Miles t 1 0 - - - MI Employment in >, w Priority 0 11111 Parks VI III■ri 2 o at Ida • • - - RAgmAgi - a.■ Mixed Use clj b Opportunity -\ 16 >, 6 4 ■ Metro IIII Cl• 11 Auto/ Freight > as _ di L [ I -- HD Residential Neighborhood ci Data Collecti ..- on Area N February 5 2013 —'.'=' Multimodal CI Roadway Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Project Tide Estimated Cost Primery Mode LATTiprd BRT Tiprd BRT Tualatin BRT Sherwood Hub &Spoke Sherwood 1068 Town Canter Signal & Intersection improvements (Downtown Sherwood) $2,812,000 Auto / Freight % X X X X IIIIIIIHIIIIIIIII 11111.1111111111 5020 Oregon- TorpWn Intersection & Street Improvements $1,945,000 MUMnwdal X X Active Transportation Projects Jurisdiction Project ID Project Mid Estimated Cost Primary Mode IRT Tigard BRT Tigard BRTTuaietin BRT Sherwood Nub & Spoke __ = 6042 99W- Sherwood TCBkyde/Ped. BMW $13,300,000 and/Ped X X % X X Southwest Corridor Plan Key Measures No Measure 1 Capital costs of all projects 2 Transit operating costs 3 Development potential 4 Distribution of jobs (by type and location) 5 Distribution of housing (by type and location) 6 Residential and business displacements 7 Transportation and housing costs by household 8 Increased tree canopy and other desirable vegetation 9 Improvements in fish passage and wildlife connectivity 10 Water quality 11 People (jobs and residents) within 1/2 mile of a bikeway, natural area, public park or trail 12 People (jobs and residents) within %2 mile of potential high capacity transit stations 13 Traffic safety (reduction in serious crashes) 14 Sidewalk connectivity on major roads within % mile of potential high capacity transit stations and within % mile of other transit routes 15 Motor vehicle mobility 16 Transit travel time between specific locations (peak and off -peak) 17 Projected transit ridership 18 Projected bike trips 19 Vehicle miles traveled 20 Mode share 3lPage SWCP Steering Committee Proposed Meeting Topics and Major Engagement Opportunities Draft 2/5/2013 Month Groups and topics January 1/14: Steering Committee meeting 2013 • Overview of Southwest Corridor Plan, where we are in process, what to expect • Transit options based on 10/2012 SC recommendation DISCUSS • Draft shared investment strategies and evaluation approach DISCUSS February 2/11: Steering Committee meeting 2013 • Shared investment strategies for evaluation ADOPT April 2013 4/8: Steering Committee meeting • Economic development strategies DISCUSS • Housing strategies DISCUSS • Policy changes DISCUSS • Green investments DISCUSS April29 ?: Community Planning Forum: advice on refinement process; implementation ideas Late April /Early May: Economic Summit: which strategy(s) best support economic development Throughout April: Local advisory committee /community presentations: offer project update presentations to Planning Commissions, Transportation or other local advisory committees, neighborhood and business groups, etc. May 2013 May 7 ?: Optln /online information: describe key tradeoffs between shared investment strategies in terms of outcomes (based on evaluation) and ask for preferences to help with refinement of preferred strategy 5/13: Steering Committee meeting (or workshop) • Evaluation results DISCUSS • Guidance on preferred strategy(s) RECOMMENDATION Throughout May: Local jurisdiction and agency presentations: provide presentations to city councils, county commissions and agencies to prepare them for future action on the preferred shared investment strategy June 2013 6/10: Steering Committee meeting • Community input on refinement of shared investment strategies DISCUSS • Preferred shared investment strategy(s) and implementation plan for the Southwest Corridor ADOPT Local jurisdiction and agency action: final presentations to city councils, county commissions and agencies to act on shared investment strategy (may involve public testimony) July — Community Planning Forum: celebrate accomplishments for corridor, discuss next September steps to support implementation 2013