The URL can be used to link to this page

CU37-77 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. . .rte. c . .�,400 DAVE FARR 4 __ _ __,./ Conditional Use (Cu 37-77) ° ' . Durham Road/West Hall Boulevard f�'`�� }rye `�9` ��• w�...� _�,.,. �r��, •, �.',:.K..-�:.:.,\ `wr 4�°:',,!..�-.N = ' ,.,�,�i� sr f ti.��':g J '«.'�7^.: 4..i.1L"J' • Reference ZC 16-77 S 3-77 e'o., . 0 `U 0) to ID 3 0 0 C) r 1 $ •. I' " l • P. TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD P. 0, Box 23557 12420 S, W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 Cqy• December 22, 1977 Dave Farr 2041 S•W• 68th Portland, Oregon 97221 46%. Re: Conditional Use 37-77 Appeal Permit for 12 duplexes in a R-7 Single Family Residential Zone Dear Mr. Farr: Please be advised the Tigard City Council at their special mseting December 19, 1977, reviewed your appeal regarding the above conditional use request. It was the decision of • Council to approve thti conditional use request for construc- tion of duplexes as requested including lot #50 If I may be of further assistance to you regarding this • matter, please feel free to contact mc. K Sincerely, cfr.2.4-c C/ ek , f Doris Harti 6/ City Recorder 1 Note: The following acknowledgment must be received by e the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your re- ceipt of this letter. Failure to return this acknowledg- ment may result in action by the City of Tigard. I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard City Council. I have received and read this letter. • / CI ). • Signature Date cc: Harris & MoMonagle Associates, Attention Jim Harris N. 4.... I., . .I / • I i '3 ' . • ' . M i 7 Dacombor 22 1977 y , . , Jclmoo °.'1,,, Harris . .. M -.1-f16 '._ luilAu„,,p,1 ' i.'„,c-.3L3oolatua L) , ',.1.1.1. Lw.lmoli:oiiii 'it. , . T1J 'rd2 .. ,7..,°ogon '°.•,722::J , . • ' ult. Cf.lndiLileal :It,o ' Ll :37-77 .. rippuLll - uavid . ,. ...un ,. Jii: ",1..,..E.) , uv( ,)., ,ht.. iJi.j.001,4 1/1.".,e, Vt.,,,t,,, Olill ' 4, . iii ',11:3F. .4,,Lio t:ii •. 1,0 / GC6v1 .,...', 4tALL 13, ' .1;.;, .1'.0 . pJ,j,i.:, <1_,H14111,1P ( pi)10 ' tt tp . ,„ot L. iti46.cip6 . GI.A. : • Public, Tir.I. J 11,11,2s FLY11, tsit III DUO )11• 03 flnelosed is uu ruf'un,,,., chor li. c.,nd it yuu have ,)1,'/ Hlh. l',,IDW regtardino thls matter, pls iuul 11J..,L to tontr).ut hit,,, • 5inuurely2 . ,e( , Doris Hortiu ) ' 1.;ity Recorder ' . . DH:by , • • . Is, • 4 . . • • • , • AFFIDAVIT ;�;.. PUBIJCA T° ON U • `i i/ CITY OF TIGARD STATE OF OREGON, DEC 0 .PUBLIC NOTICE' , SS. r� (,, X977 Notice is hereby given that the City n COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Council will consider the Fallowing at ry o 'Fowler Junior High School Lecture 79 ?L)Joseph Schafer T, ..,r ................. •'gon,on Decen.�ber 19;1977, . ZONE CHANGE'.- Request by Ken- ',' - being fast duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher ................................. .'neth Waymire. Waverly Construction t+, for a general plan and program review ...... .of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined w of a residential planned development to a R-7 zone on.a 6.85 acre pardel at 8065 ' S.W.Bonita Road(Wash:Co. Fax Map by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and S.W.2 o Tax Lot 500). • S ` I XNOTICE O CONDITIONAL IC RING. .r state that the legal notice, a printed copy of which Is hereto annexed was PPE USE `'`' : , . 2 i,'The Planning Commission approval of, published in the entire issue of said newspaper for successive and It a request by Dave Farr for a cort1itial at use permit for 12 duplexes in,a R-7,` . ' consecutive weeks in the following issues ' Single Family. Residential zone at ,, Stratford Subdivision ('VVaa sh., o. Tax C.. Dec-etub.er 7..&....14.,.--..1.97_7:M............... . Map 2S1.11D,Tax Lot 1400, " APPEAL.1 CONDITIONAL.USE - ..�. !-'-'47/ „ ,,., , , �' ,..,,.., ''The Planning Commission approval of (Sig t ..re) a request by School District No 233 (Templeton. Elementary School) for a 16th conditional use ermlt for a new phVsi- . cal education facility at 9500•SW Mur- Subscribed and sworn to before the this, day of .., , °rr dock(Wash co, ax Map 2S1 11A,Tax December 77 e2901 3oi1.), •, Wit( :7;0-1'7 44 Lots ..'... .' .� 19 I'' ' Testimony will,be limited to summa---)1(&e,/ Luto2Sjej. " tiort of previous statements, ' BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Notary Public of Oregon • DORIS HARTIG, CITY-RECORDER* .(T"I'3460--Publish 1 4, ' My commission .expires .,.,. . ' \.. _. , • b . . /.)1 ' I', ..*•'1?)*'i `( r r ��, '., • ,Y.:. l.i A ti • m .' f , 1 '. .:e.. .. _....... .ems'',.Y't:`.+..iM.—+J-......."J'.+... M..�..e-:f..vT..=YC..�V.i+-'+c.CIY._P�4xN rt.+.S`.rases%'c4--'..i.ivr+x..sz.u+'1nM..Y.... aa -...._._..., . ,�M+ • ' " tv* MM) n CITY OF TIGARD P.O. Box 23397 12420SAN.Nlain Tigard,Oregon97223 • December 6, 1977 1 James R. Harris Harris-McMonagle Associates 8905 SW Commercial Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: CU37-77 - Appeal Dear Mr. Harris: . • Please be advised that the Tigard City Council, at their regular meeting of December 19, 1977, will hold a public hearing on the above request at ..° 8:00 P.M. at Fowler Junior High Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon. Please advise Mr. Farr of this date, and time. Enclosed is a copy of . the verbatim transcript which was prepared for this hearing. If you have any questions regarding the hearing, please feel free to contact me, or the Planning Department. Sincerely, (1, Doris Mar tig City Recorder 1 DH:lw NOTE: The following acknowledgment must be received by the City of • , Tigard before tlie date of the above mentioned public hearing. Failure to do so may result in action by the City of Tigard. I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the date of public hearing as set by the Tigard City Council, I have received and read this letter. Signature Date A 4, MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION December 6, 1977 Page 13 D. Commission Discussion: Popp moved and Goldbach seconded for approval. The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. 7. Other Business: o Popp read the minutes from the meeting of the interview 4 a • board to fill the two vacancies and voiced his disagreement with the appointment of a City employee to the Planning Com- mission. o Sakata was also very concerned about the selection process and felt the Planning Commission should have an input into the selection; she was also disappointed with the appoint- ments. o Laws reminded the Commissior that the meeting of December 20, 1977 was cancelled and that the next regularly scheduled meeting would be January 3, 1978. o Staff a.3in,„t-Gt-v.me4-..4h,e,....Zmmission that appeals by Mr: Dave Farr (tauittipai Use 31:25and the Tigard School District (Conditional use"-T7=77) were to be heard at the City Council hearing of December 19, 1977. 8. Adjournment: There being no other business, the meeting was adjourned at • 10 :00 p.m. • . ......, _ . . • , 4 , t , TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD P.O. Box 23397 , . 12420 S,W. Main Tigard,Oregon 97223 November 23, 1977 , /3EC it/l ) Farr Dave 2041 S .W. 58th L, City ot .., Portland, Oregon 97221 r- /in UMHD . . Re: Conditional Use 37-77 Dear Mr. Farr: • Please be advised that the Tigard Planning Commission at their regu- lar meeting of November 15 , 1977 denied your request for a condi- ' tional use permit for 12 duplexes in a R-7, Single Family Residential, zone at Stratford Subdivision. The proposal was denied based on the tacts that the duplex proposed would face single family dwellings and duplex lots were not necessary to protect the owners* land values. A Actions of the Planning Commission are final unless notification of 1 appeal to the City Council is filed with the city recorder within 20 '. 1 days of the Planning Commission action. If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to - '" contact me at this office. Sincerely, A -- i C, icit, Ny . • ) ...)/ , ,,.., ,... JQin Laws Associate Planner ali/jh cc: Harris-McMonagle Associates [I:1 .''' Note: The following acknowledgment must be received by the City of . Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this let- ter. Failure to return this acknowledgment may result in ac- tion .1( by the City of Tigard. 1 hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard Planning Commission. 1 have received and read, this letter. ,- , „ el( /9 -/ -9 /iLf.Z t, ......_........ ........_.....4......_ _ - Signature Date #4, HA RUIS-MCMONAGLE .ASSOCIATES SINOINFIIM13.81CTRVIIIVOUS 8905 S.W.COMMERCIAL STREET (C/ TIGARD,OREGON 07228 ° TELEPHONE (508) 030-3453 M' / 1 November 16, 1977 • City of Tigard 12420 S. W. Main St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE Conditional Use CU 37-77 4 CI Gentlemen: On behalf of our client, David E. Farr, we are hereby requesting an appeal to the City Council of the Planning Comthission denial A . of CU 37-77. Enclosed is a check in the amount of $100.00 which is the estimated cost for the appeal. Your prompt action on this matter would be appreciated. Sincerely y urs, ; 4 /e42 * awes R. Harris • .• Harris-McMonagle Associates .44 JRH:ds enc. — . MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 15, 1977 Page 5 o Wood asked that the motion be amended to include: 1. That Conclusionary Finding 1 be cut to exclude the referenct to Baker vs. Milwaukie 2. That Unit D be common wall housing on separate lots to encourage single family ownership. Brian moved and Moore seconded to accept Wood's two amendments to the motion. The motion was approved six to three, with Sakata, Gold bach„ and Tepedino dissenting. 5.3 Conditional Use q(37-77 (Farr) A request by Dave Farr for a conditional use permit for 12 duplexes in a R-7, Single Family Residential, zone at Strat- ford Subdivision (Wash. Co. Tax Map 251 IID, Tax Lot 1400) A. Staff Report: Read by Laws 4. Applicant's Presentation: Jam Harris, Harris and McMonagle Associates, stated that the applicant agreed with all staff conditions. C. Public Testimony: None t. • D. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval witi the following condition: 1. Lot 50 be a duplex lot. ,) E, Commission Discussion: o Sakata and Tepedino questioned the consistency of placing duplex units next to single family homes in relationship to the last item. o Popp stated that duplexes were necessary as a buffer along Durham and between two different types of land uses. • ; k MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 15, 1977 Page 6 o Goldbach stated that the planning department's di- , • rections were inconsistent and that by approving du- plexes future development patterns were being fore closed on adjoining property. o Wood stated that the application should be denied because it was inconsistent with planning principles. Wood moved and Sakata seconded for denial based on the facts that the duplex proposed would face single family dwelling and duplex lots were not necessary to protect the owners' land values. The motion was approved with one abstention--Popp. 5.4 Conditional Use CU 38-77 (MTI) A request by Theodore Hunt (MTI, Inc. ) for a conditional usd permit to operate an electronics assembly company in a M-4, "Light Manufacturing" , zone on a 5 .51 acre parcel at 8900 S.W. Burnham Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AD, Tax Lot 2200) 0 yin A. Staff Report: Read by Laws B. Applicant's Presentation: ' Theodore Hunt, applicant, outlined the method of opera- tion. C. Public Testimony: None 0 ' D. Staff Recommendation: •1 ' 11111111 , • Staff recommends approval. E. Commission Discussion: Goldbach moved and Salrata seconded for approval based on staff findings. The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. • • A 4 STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5. 3 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 15, 1977 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room 10865 S .W. Walnut Street - Tigard, Oregon Docket: Conditional Use CU 37-77 Request: For 12 duplexes in a R-7, Single Family Residential, zone (Stratford Subdivision) Location: North side of S.W. Durham Road west of Hall Boulevard (Wash, Com Tax Map 2S1 IID, Tax Lot 1400) Applicant: David Farr • I . Findings of Fact: 4 1. The site is designated "Urban Low Density Residential" on the Tigard Community Plan, 1971 and zoned R-7, Single Fam- , ily Residential. 2. Section 18, 20 .020 (1) of the Tigard Municipal Code permits "Duplex residential, with a minimum lot of 10,000 square feet: one duplex per lot;. or two single family attached units with a minimum lot area of 5 ,000 square feet per A unit. In the event it appears that it is not practical to divide a legal lot into two lots oZ 5,000 square feet each, the planning director may approve the division not- . withstanding the fact that one lot is less than 5,000 square feet, provided, however, that no such lot shall be smaller than 4,250 squcife feet, 3 The applicable policy from the Tigard Housing text is the following: Policy 15: Provide greater diversity of housing density . , (e.g. , duplexes, four-ptex, attached single family W units., etc. ) . II. Staff Observations: 1. The site is a flat parcel surrounded by single family de- velopment to the west, vacant parcels to the north and east, and the Tigard High School to the south and across Durham Road. • 2 . The preliminary plan for a 71 lot subdivision (Stratford) was approved for this sihe on July 20, 1977 with the foi- 1, lowing applicable conditions: ••MY• ...■•■•■ * • STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5. 3 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 15, 1977 Page 2 o Right-of-way necessary to provide 45 feet from center line of S.W. Durham Road be dedicated for street pu.r- poses. o A covenant be attached to the deed of any lots abutting Durham Road restricting direct access to Durham Road. Joint access and curb cut agreements be filed for Lots 6 and 7y 15 and 16, 67 through 70 . . o Deed covenants be attached to all lots sharing joint access for purposes of prescribing responsibility for maintenance of the access drives. o An earth berth be installed and landscaped along S.W. Durham Road. Landscape design to be submitted for de- sign review approval. o A six foot wide bike path be constructed along Durham Road. 3. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to locate 12 duplexes on 10,000 square foot lots adjacent Durham Road and along the southeastern, property line of the subdivision. 4 . The location of duplexes along the south property line (Durham Road) would provide a buffer between the arterial street and the single family units in the northern portion of the development. Along the eastern property line duplexes would also pro- vide a transitional land use between the single family residences and the area designated as Community Shopping on the Tigard Communtiy Plan, 1971 and tentatively pro- posed as a civic center (or similar institutional use) • site on the NPO 6 draft plan map. The Planning Commission has previously approved at the .) request of another applicant tne location of duplexes along the northern boundary line of the deslgnatod commu- nity shopping area (1971 Plan) . 5 The applicant has not included in his request that Lot 50 also be a duplex lot, It would appear appropriate that • . . 0.11.■..0 - _ . . # .,---, .„,,, ,,-- , , (4 / , STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 .3 . TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION i s November 15, 1977 Page 3 •,,. ' 1111 this lot should also be a duplex lot as it shares the same locational circumstances as the lots being requested for duplex use to the south. III. Conclusionary Findings: 1. This request conforms to the density limitations of the , . . R-7 zone (Single Family Residential) and Urban Low Density Resi L. ntial designation of the Tigard Community Plano ..'' 1971. In addition, NPO 6 has endorsed this location as , . , suitable for duplex development. , . 2. The duplex lots will provide a buffer between single fam- , ily homes and the property to the east at such time as it is developed either commercially or ao some type of . institutional or multi-family use and will also provide a buffer between the arterial street (Durham Road) and the single family homes within the subdivision. 4, p. ° 3. There is an identified public need to provide a diversity of housing types within the community, according to poll cies set out in the Housing Plan. 4 The location of a duplex on Lot 50 appears in order o that a continuation of the transitional use strip around •■ the designated community shopping area (Tigard Community Plan, 1971) could be satisfied. . .., IV. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval with the following condition: ., 1. Lob 50 be a duplex lot. . . , - V . i , APPEAL Tigard Planning Commissiea nearing November 15, 177 5.3 Conditional Use CU 37-77 (Farr) A request by Dave Parr for a conditional use permit for 12 duplexes in a R-7, Single Family Residential, zone al. Stratford Subdivision (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 11D, Tax Lot 1400) CHAIRMAN: Is someone here representing the applicant, please? HARRIS: Mr. Chairman, Jim Harris, I represent the applicant. CHAIRMAN: Okay, thank you Mr. Harris. We'll be with you in just a minute here. May we have the Staff presentation, please? 4 STAFF: If you give me a moment here I'll get my house in order. Okay. Did yr.A bring your exhibit? Did you bring your exhibit for Farr? Okay, Mr. Chairman, • •, Ready here. Findings of fact. The site is designated urban low density residential it the Tigard Community Plan 1971. zoned R-7, Single Family Residential. Section 18:20.0201 of the Tigard Municipal Code permits duplex-residential with a minimum lot of 10,000 square feet which is one duplex oer lot or two single family attach.. ed units with a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet per unit. In the event it e appears; that it is not practical to divide the legal lot to thy() lots of 5,000 square feet each, the Planning Director may approve the di‘isien, not withstanding the fact that one lot is less than 5,000 square feet ptovided that, however, no such lot shall be smaller than 4,250 aquare feet. The applicable policy from the Tigard Housing Text is the following: Policy No. 15, provide greater diversity of housing density for example - duplexes, 4-plexes, attached single family units, • etc. Staff observation - this site is a flat parcel surrounded by single family development to the west, vacant parcel to the north and east, and the Ti6ard High School to the south and across Durham Road. ,efer to the zone map A, appologize for not havi)g the exhillit. Tie site we are referring to this evening is right here. This is Summerfisid to west, Tigard High School to the south) undeveloped parcel here to the east, and another undeveloped parcel, at this time, also to the east and to the north. You may note that the preliminary plan for 71 lot subdivison 4,. which is titled Stratford was approved for this site on July 20, 1977, with the 2 following applicable conditions: Right-at-way necessary to provide 45 feet from center of line of S.W. Durham Road be dedicated for street purposes. A covenant be attached to the deed of any lots abutting Durham Road restricting direct access , , to Durham Road. The joint access and curb tut agreements be filed for lots 6 and 7, 15 and 16, and 67 through 70. Deed covenants be attached to all lots sharing joint access for purposes of prescribing maintenance responsibility for the access drives. And that an earthberm be installed and landscaped along S.W. Durham Road, Landscape design to be submitted for design review approval and, finally, that a , 6 foot wide bike path be constructed along Durham Road. The applicant is request- ing the Conditional Use Permit to locate 12 duplexes on 10,000 square foot lots adjacent to Durham Road and along the southeasterly property line of the subdivision - if you refer to the exhibits in front of you Along the eastern property line, duplexes would also provide a transitional land use between the single family resi- deuce and the atea designated as community shopping on the Tigard Community Plan, 1971 and tentatively proposed -as a civic center, or similar institutional use site, on the NPO No 6 draft plan map. The Planning Commission has previously approved, at the request of another applicant, the location of duplexes along the northern boundary line of the designated community shopping tenter. (Staff pointed out the areae under consideration on the map). The applicant has not included in his request tht lot 50 . and again refer to the exhibit - also be a duplex lot. It would ppar appropriate that this lot should also be a duplex lot as it shares the same locateonal circumstances as the lots being requested for duplex use to the south. Inclusionary ' tete findings: This request co .tforms to the dense and limits of the R-7 zone, single family residential, and the urban low density residential designation of the Tigard Community Plan, 1971. In addition, NPO No 6 has endorsed this locetion ae suitable ' for duplex development, No 2, the de e duplex lots will provi a buffer between single '10 family homes and the property to the east at belch time as de.reloped either commercial- c lYp 'r as some type of institution or multi-family use$ and will also provide a buffer between the arterial streets, Durham Road, and the single family homes with- it the subdivision. There is an identified public need to provide diversity of housing types within the community according to policies set out in the housing and finally, the location of duplex on lot 50 appears in order so that con- tinuation of the transitional use strip around the designated community shopping area Tigard Community Plan, 1971 could be satisfied. That concludes the Staff Report. CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Any presentation by the applicant) please? 01111111.1111=1.111111111. Ai II • 3 .i t • , HARRIS: Mr. Chairman, the applicant agrees with the Staff's recommendation and . this was discussed.. . .. . .(inaudible). • CHAIRMAN: Okay, thank you Mr. Harris. Would you also tell the people your name and address? k. 1 ARRIS: My name is Jim Harris, Harris & McMonagle Associates. • ,;():1 CHAIRMAN: Anyone else wishing to testify in favor of these proposals? Anyone ,l ,'., wishing to testify in opposition of these proposals? May we have the Staff's recom- ,,'4' mendation? p:t ,,° STAFF: The Staff recommends approval with the following conditions That lot 50 `4Pa.' Gi 'el,66 be a duplex lot. #.. ,g CHAIRMAN: All right. Anyone wishing to speak in rebuttal? This hearing is closed, Commissioners? :' / SAKATA: Mr. Chairman. Ii l' CHAIRMAN Mrs. Saka t.a. SSAt(ATA: May I ask what you have to . .(tape change). ti 0 k:' STAFF: It would be appropriate that those lots also be duplex lots, correct? It . . SA ATA: Yes. ' t , STAFF: Okay. Where the question becomes then M is the lots, then, to the north- q. easterly, or westerly area, should they continue then as duplex lots? This became III presented a problem in that we'd end up with essentially creating almost a duplex i` :• ) ; subdivision and a point appea,�ed that had to be determined as to what is, first of r • all, being accomplished here. Tee buffer, if you will, between the designstod area (essentially that row of lots along the south property line, excuse me, along the • eastern pre'° Irty line) would meet that intent. The buffer between the single fontil):, 1 and he multi family, or the duple c Land the art :ria,l st-�reet, again w�oul.d meet twhat. The question then becomes of consistency of saying, if that's the case . if were _...__.. „.._ ..._:--.-. ,•:....-m..r�{w °. .:: ,s'-s.:.+..rw_...........ac. :s�'.'v' v .:=+gym,., _. �:�a--v.�.n-..�.—e.s...�. ._ •�1 o 1. 4 talking about change and land use types that rear property lines - is that happen- ing here? And the concern for the Staff was that if you provide duplexes with that -• lotting pattern on the north side you would continue the theme. and I don't knoN, where it would end. So, it seems that in this case that there is a need to es tab- fish just duplexes at one point and not continue through the development bas4 upon the lotting pattern. I know that's not a very good answer, but it's kind of a tough one in this situation. •.. SAICATA: its not a good answer. CHAIRMAN: Frank? TEPEDINO Mr, Chairman, I'm concerned about the last issue we disposed of here, 6 , I think that perhaps some Commission members were influenced by the argument that duplexes ought to face duplexes, and that it would be unfair to have duplexes facing single family homes; and I think our disposition of that issue imposed and infringed on the rights of property owners and the ownership of that home to be probably one. of the single „ the largest investment most of us working stiff ever make. And yet, on this development w the very next issue, were saying, well, in this case the Staff is saying it's really not so bad to have single fsrnl.ly homes facing du- plexes because we're going to have a full development here and it would seem il- logical to do anything else. I'm really upset about that. I'm really upset about that because we sent people home tonight with less interest in their property than they had when they came in here. With the reverse side of that same argument, and I think were saying, I think there were some Commissioners who voted in favor of that proposal. And here we have the same argument being advanced - to be in favor of single family homes teeing duplexes. And the trouble you hear in my voice is real - more than just a little upset about that kind of philosophy. CHAIRMAN: All right, l GOLDBACH: Well, I feel the same way and all I car, say is that...... .well, I'll say it in just a few minutes. Let someone else, SAKATA: Well, I'm upset, I think this is an inconsistency of planning. CHAIRMAN.: Well, I'll tell you w I think Staff tried to give you their answer and. not that I've got any b t ter answer, maybe it's not even., , ,.. , . . . I'll try to 0 lowwwwwsi 5 '. explain it the way I see it. And I de 't feel it's an inconsistency to planning, Maybe there's a difference of opinion on the planning, the difference being on what M ' we're actually trying to accomplish. I think what we're talking about is basically when we've reviewed duplexes it's usually as a buffer. We use a different interpre- tation of how deep should a buffer go. By the same token now, if we were to say okay, lots 55 through 60 and lots 69 and lot 50, and so on, should all be developed as duplexes, anybody, by the same token, now we can continue and go right on straight up that same . . .. , . . .And we can just continue on to say well, (inaudible), Now, I was clearly explicit to state within this last development that I felt very strongly that when this square gets developed in there, I feel sure in m} own mind that un- A doubtedly some of these should develop as duplex. I have no doubt about that in my mind, whatsoever. But 1 still feel strongly that the buffer is better to ac- complish on a back yard basis. Many times in these developments we have had duplexes use the buffer zone between such items as high school - we don' t have that many high schools - but as of any type, other type, of development rather. , than residential, , If this were a complete residential development, and across this street were just more single family homes, I would be opposed to any duplexes being built there - in any way, shape, or form. We have a development on one side of the street that is either type of a commercial or indds trial, or some type other than residential development, And I feel then that between the single family planned development and the cotnme'rci, l or industrial, or some type of development, I can see and under« stand, and I think it's consistency in planning, and I think this is what we're intending to do - whereby we allow them for the duplexes to serve as a buffer, Now, I don't i.eel that there is inconsistency between what, we've decided, or what we're trying to decide here as this has not been decided, and what is - , r what was de- cided on the previous issue. I can certainly understand there is an honest dif-' ference of opinion whether or not we should have duplexes or single family residences or whether we should have common wall construction, or you know, maybe 10,000 square foot lots or 8,000 or 5,000, But, I think there are obvious differences of opinion and I honestly don' t look at it as being inconsistent. I think it's a genuine effort of trying to plan according to the best dictates of each person's conscience. Now, I happen to feel very strongly that I still believe that we made the right decision on that last development. I was concerned as to people who live on Fairhaven Way that suddenly they don' t wake up with a slum dwelling in their back yard, And I'll guarantee that when they come up for final approval on that development, that 0 •) „ one of the most important criteria, even more so than what's built on those lots, is goin r; to be what type of home owners association agreement is made for the main- tenance and the caring of all those properties up there, And I specifically mention w z v 6 ed the over development because I think it is something that's tome home to haunt a lot of people and those of us who have served on this body for a period of time • I think are very conscious about the things that can suddenly sneak by. But, when I am talking about this type of a development, I still feel that the duplex develop- ment here is serving as a buffer between two different types of land uses. I think it's consls tent in the type of planning of today. • GOLDBACH: Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN: Mr. Goldbeck. GOLDBACH: No. 1, I think we are inconsistent in our application of the rules. And secondly, your comment about that square up there. We have set the pattern for the development of that square. It's going to be duplexes now - there's no doubt about it. It will come back as a duplex development. There just isn't any other way. And thirdly, when a developer comes in we're stuck with the result of that. And those people now, they're behind that development, are stuck with what we've dictated. And the developer that was here said, "Well., we're not going to take off and leave you with a mess." Well, it isn't what's happened very often. • I think they're only worried about making a buck on the thing. They don't care about the result. CHAIRMAN: Okay, Tom. • BRIAN: Well, this, I think, we do need to be consistent and based on some sound planning principles, one of which has been suggested to us would be that duplexes would not face single family residences. I still feel that our prior 5.2 is corn- plied with correctly, but this one I do have a question on our consistency in that «• did I understand that Staff's suggestion to the applicant - that these be duplexes, and did the applicant come in originally for these to be single family? STAPP. Okay. Bt'JAN% Let me ask a second question while I'm - am I correct in my understanding that duplex lots are allowable as a buffer? That is allowable, but not required? Is there a problem with these being single family lots? STAPP: The answer to your second question first. No, duplexes are not required as y • �� r...,...x .:xa„ice ,. .. ri• . uww, t-+a.... .,... . r r... µ �-4 _et • 7 a buffer and they could develop as single family lots. In answer to your first question, the applicant, during his submission for a subdivision, did talk to Staff of which I am not going to say I didn't have privy to that conversation. I wasn't involved in it at the time, but my understanding was, and it's been confirmed, that there was a proposal that suggested, anyway, that these developed as duplexes or multiple family in that area. Lt's also now been reiterated in the findings of the planning of the NPO No. 6 that this would be appropriate land use for this area as well, So, I'm not saying that we set the stage months ago with the approval of the subdivision because all it was was suggestion. The applicant is well aware that these were a conMtional use and it must go before the public hearing process in order for them to be approved. He did, however, plan his subdivision to accommo- date large enough lots, plan for large enough lots to accommodate duplexes contin- , gent upon the approval, That's all I can say in terms of the background. CHAIRMAN t All right, is there any additional discussion? Mark? 4 . WOOD: I also agree that their approving this would be inconsistent and I think it ought to be denied. I'll tell you why - I think there are several reasons. No. 1, you look at the lots; there are a number of lots here that are not 10,000 square foot lots, even, These are smaller than 10,000. That one shaking his head, I see one here identified on four sides as 85, 101, 185, and if my multiplication ie correct, that's an 8500 square foot lot - or close to it. But, in any event, regardless of lot size, the intensity of use along either the arterial or along the civic center with back lot lines backing up to it is not so as to make single • family unrealistic in these zones. We have a lotting pattern in the subdivision here that would require duplexe' across the Street from single family houses which is a pattern we tried . we consistently avoided, and I see no reason to pick it up now, I point out that the duplexes that were approved along the north of that center were a self-contained unit on both sides of the street facing each other, again self contained, The buffering here is not a matter of necessity; it is a matter that when you want to get more duplexes to provide a variety of housing types, this • 1 le an alternate opportunity to do it with little or no adverse effect on the neigh. • boring properties for apartments and so forth. Here it is not necessary, and think it would be bad planning to put it in this way, ,/ CHAIRMAN: All right, thank you, Ste"e, any comment? V MOOR a: No comment. CHAIRMAN: Anyone else have a comment? Any discussion? STAFF: Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN: John STAFF: Just one brief comment that I am troubled too by inconsistency. But at the same time, this application previously tonight that dealt with the same issue, and then this application where we fins the inconsistency is not something that appears to be new. The Commission on other occasions has approved mixing of uses, duplexes next to single family, as a matter of fact, behind single family where you had single family surrounding a t. So, at least in that respect, it may not be to the intensity of this development as being proposed but in terms of the land use question of locating of duplexes next to re:gidential units, single family residential. The Commission has on previous •ccasions approved such. I'm not saying that it . • g ives grounds for justification for this particular development, although Staff does approve of it; however, and l do concur with comments that were made tonight because same comments the Staff has made on previous occasions, that as a principle of good land use planning that transitional land uses should take place at rear lot lines. This is not to say that is imbedded in concrete and is not subject to change depending upon the circumstances. I think this application is different in respect without elaborating on it, than the previous application as far as the land use proposals. WOOt): May I just ask one question of Staff just for my own clarification. I only know what's happened in the year that I've been on the Commission, and maybe I'm missing, maybe I've forgotten, what I would consider to be an erroneous judgement that we made on this; but, have we ever, at .least in the last year, approved the location of duplexes across the street from single family houses in a situation where that duplex is not already not located next to existing duplexes? STAFF Okay. I refer to, it is not in a situation where it was across the street but next to, there was a conditional use request for duplexes o n 121st about Summer- crest area which the Commission approved, We had single family fronting on 121st and there was proposal for locating duplexes behind the single family, and on the ' rt—..n,.• tsSm`ss'sH.�. �...•c_,,,a:,r:;� •*-•uuc=.:rx,=ia._:.r_-�='irx=z.Rx-:-::ir��»j'raK'.'.."T,"iF"°='.w�''"`°' .. ......,�' , 9 other side of that, so that you had single family, duplex, single family. e WOOD: All back lot lines, weren' t they? STAFF: Well, how do you determine you had single. family? I'm just saying that 4 . 6 it has happened. On 98th and McCoy proposal you had single family, you had one single family house that existed, and you had another single family house that had a vacant lot, and a single family house, The Commission approved a oultiple family, • • or duplex, in between that single family house, I'm just saying, the circumstance , . is not exactly the same here, the conditions; but, there has been places where you have, or previous applications her ynu have approved duplexes next to single family houses without using that criteris of real lot lines being the drawing point. However, I'll refer to the Corbett Development proposal on 95th which you approved a transition area where you did have approved.6 duplex lots with salvage yard to , the one side, and then you had single family to the other side. There, in that 4 . case, you did have duplexes facing duplexes without buffer there, So, the Planning Commission, on other occasions, has applied that concept. SAKATA: Now what you are referring to are duplexes facing duplexes. And, in the McCoy problem, you were talking about duplexes facing the church, but now, if I understand Mr. Wood's question, he is asking about duplexes facing single family lots which is what this is. . STAFF: Well, I pointed eat that this situation didn't exactly fit that mold; but, you did have duplexes next to single family, and I think that's the issue there, too. If yoe have them facing each other, what's the difference having them next door to you as opposed to facing you? That becomes a question too. Is it only, it't not only front lot lines, but does it also tie the side lot lines as well? ) " That's debatable, but what I'm saying is that I'm net trying to find all kinds of good grounds to Justify this on the basis that shows it I6n't inconsistent, I'm just saying there have been previous occasions that approval, has oeen granted. WOOD: Mr. Chairman, can I make a motion? CHAIRMAN: All right, Mark, would you please? WOOD: I move for denial based on the fact that the duplexes purposed would face single family dwellings which we previously found to be inconsistent with good land 10 • planning practices, and also based on the fact that given the uses that would be • behind the purposed duplex lots, the duplex lots are not necessary to protect the basic property value of the owner. CHAIRMAN: All right. Does someone care to second the motion? SAXATA: I do. CHAIRMAN: All right. It has' been seconded. Any further discussion? We will call for the question. All those lel favor of the motion toward denial signify by saying aye. • RESPONSE: Aye. . P CHAIRMAN: Those opposed? t RES1.'NSE (No response). 4. . CHAIRMAN: The motion was carried. STAFF: Was that unanimous? CHAIRMAN: No, I abstained. Okay, you have the right to appeal to the City Council. HARRIS,. Mac. Chairman, can I just make one comment? My name is Jim Harris. CHAIRMAN: I knew you were Jim Harris, I'm sorry. • HARRIS: You talk about inconsistency. We've dealt with this thing now for about • a year. We've been le;l down the garden path, I guess. but we should have multi- • family dwellings in that development. And, it would gross to you people, the same board, sitting right here a few months ago when everything was "honkey dory". You talk about inconsistency! How can you say that? It was the most inconsistent thing I've ever seen, when this happened. The preliminary plat was approved and it said • a , right around on every one of those lots. It was talked about that these would 1 e. duplex lots, and it was a formality that we would have to come in here. And then you turn around, a few months later, and say, "No, it's too inconsistent with everything." The brunt of it. We originally came in with an altogether single family dwelling and the whole thing, we were told it wouldn't buy. • . . 11 CHAIRMAN: Yeah. Anyway, this is the decision. . „ HARRIS: Now we are committed. We've already calculated the lots, the lots are staked. CHAIRMAN: Okay, well thank you much. t k, . . . ' ,1 ) . , ), 1 • i sue..... ...,..u4iws6i�+N.ieM�J: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING r ., ) BLIC ATION,� 0,, , .,AGARL PLANNING COMMISSION ,' AFFIDAVIT C� _.� tip '''4.; November 15',,1.977 7:30 p.rn.. •A 1.iSrd ' Fowler Juniou High School Lecture r STATE OF OREGON, �`/.4P fi'j Room ,. ct?�; �4 NT ° OF WASHINGTON, 8 S.W. Walnut O g ' , •• ►� 5,1 Zone Change'•2C♦ 3047 (ti Scholar..- -.« O . Z, Joseph ............. .w...............♦r.....«.;......«.. . A!+lre)� 'n n C"�.,." n Jrwr.r.tiw�n.h 3047 r..+n+�nklAYakl; L�1P " A request,by I:erirreth Waymire Wal being first duly sworn, depose and say that Y am the publisfaer .....«.....-...._. ,. verly Construs ti`on,for:a general plarI and program, review.of a residential'i of The Tigard Times, a newspaper crf general clrculAtiota, as defined planned devalopmenl in a R•7•zone can,,' 1 ..._... ...�~. a 9.85 acre parcel at, 8066 SW lonita by ORS 193.01.0 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and , Road (Viraa�h.;Ga, Tax Map 2Si J 213,: Tax Lot 5NVr)`,"•',i;' '`' • .P- ,'iyy,. 4,', • r • — ante, �" 27. 7 ( Loz1�1?, of which is hereto annexed, was 5.2 Zone.C,h state; that the legal notice, a printed copy midge) NPO 3;. ''. . . '�it.pA 2;;'I�'�a 41'r1 • `shed in the entire issue of said newspaper for ... . ' --� . successive and A request by^ Stonericige. DeYvelop. • pubu meat Company for a'prcliminary=Plan'', consecutive weeks in the following issues w....... ...:-...«.... _..�. N ...•.... .. -..---.-:. ""... and program review of a Iwo phase res. ' idential/commercial planned develop-,.; 77 f �Merit on an&8 acre parcel Wa�la Coy Tax Map 2,�'1alOA,,•Tax Lots.'10t1,`}8(10',':.: �,, ....#,..;��..r�c, �r, 1 Wash.Co."f' 1'Kap 251-3D1�,Tax Lots,. , , "".s. ...�:....«..,.«...�.�. •• -�' 801,.900, illtkD, 1�.a0&.1500)and a.zone.,, ' , 4,1,' ',} �/ � 4 ign r'e) map amendment}'from 11-10 ",SSingle' �' ' ,} Family Residential".to,CPs"Commer .. : , ° , , , W... day of vial Pr'of'essional" oIk panels totalling ,,% cubscribed.and,sworn to before me this «._..--........:« 3.56 acres (Wash.,.Co. Tax Map 77 tie$OD Tax L Da 900 and the eastern or- • ....,aV: ,.� r•«., :� , .,. t`5.3 �ondikivnal°Use CU 37-`y'1(I''ai`A)... • ""' fir' '�r , r,,,,' � ,.,.,, �,,•�g t I • " `�%;, r, . ►�,,,c,,nt:,10 ..w:. A request by Dave Parr for a condi-'o of Oregon tional use permit for 12 duplexes in a . R,-7 Sicngle.Familyr Residlentia.l 2;one on' 6 n. side of S.W. Durham.Road (Wash. My commission expires *« .. .._- « . 19 i Co.Tax Map 2S1»11D,Tax Lot 1400), Y 5.4 Conditional Use CU 38.77 (Mil)* .. ""1`IS i.I M -.4,,.4if d Y P°' i Mr•,SA�k it't. ht. ;" * . .,x v A request.by Theodore Hunt t(M 1'1 .. Inc.) for a.conditional use per=mit,to', operate an electronics assembly clan-., ; parry it saLlvM4:,,'Light.Manufa+�4urizig"f:,' Zone".°ma 55t`aere parcel at 8C .x SA',{ Burnhi n,Rd.,(Waalb:.Co..'r.....r'alx42Strx,°" A••2AD,Tax ax l ottf W+r ii). ,.,',•1 ,:4,i,, '}ti tl i({`:#WAS f, •All persona`l}.a int n�1ntere ;3r'i tli' � hearing'natter?arehlxivited to'appear°'',` and submit oralssndl rritt:en.teatlinony,,, , or submit written t;a;stinzony irz ad�i+arnc+ of the meeting„°;' . ,1 2 y l'll'., i,q u a?1/4► Na'�H (FT.3 — blialhr'Wav,"',7; 1977)=7,4 ',t, t • . — -.—.-- ...•,.44..,, ,N, _,......2.,..,.*1 •I l1 t ' 1 ', '-*'':” :;.,'.1::::\' i5(l r 6r 1. 7 4,. 1 1 is• f I • ... .«<.-w..we...--v.a,..�.ua...�.--,.-:,.. .....�.....-...- ....w..z...r...-...+.-,,,...-r.... .�......Y ...... + .- ,, ,... ,..,... _ • (4 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OP OREGON County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard I, Judith Ann Heise, being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: That I am Secretary for the Planning Department for the City of Tigard, Oregon That I served notice of hearing of the Tigard Plan- ning Commission of which the attached is a copy (Market Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the day of 197 /?, by mailing to each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Market Exhibit B) , said notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United States Mail on the ),ALL,,,-0) day of f) ),pe) 0] , 197Th postage prepaid. ; '6(4 • Subscribed and sworn to before me on the 4-TH day of 1•10UE-V1 ItiNtS40 1971 . _ 012(11111/aAJOS , Notar 4 Public of Oregon My comm 4 1 ti Ilq ission expires „ J„, , 4 4 A '37 • a. . , . , ( , . , • . • rnAk. CITY OF TIGARD P.O. Box 23357 12420 S.W. Main, Tigard, Oregon 97223 . ' . • .- .. , '.., .. Dear Properly Owner: The agenda enclosed for the next , t..c.n ,,, of the Tiaid P1 innit4,, Gouvitission includt an. item (circled in red) which, dot., its location ndjacent property owned oi or copied by you or due to your previously inicotcd inter( ot, the C4ty feet,-, obii- t. ted to notify you It you wish to make your view.., 'known in thh, matter, or it you only wiqh to .vn13 ourself of this opportunity to no informed topc( rning this project, the Ti .ud Planning Commissiln invites you to attend thl:„.., m( etinr,. , . ) • l'k , . ' • • 4: 4 AGENDA 0 JICARD PLANNING COMMISSION NtNember 15, 1977 - 7:30 p m Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room S W Walnut Street - Tigard, Oregon 2 Call to Order: Roll Call: Approval of Minutes. . Communications: Public Hearings: A. Staff Report B. Applicant's Presentation C, Public Testimony: • a. Proponent's b Opponent's C. Cross-examination n- D Staff Recommendation a. Staff b. Cross-examination 4 E. Commission Discussion and Action 5 1 Zone Change ZC 30-77 (Waymire) NPn A request by Kenneth Waymire, Waverly Construction, for a general plan and pro- gram review of a residential planned development in a R-/ zone on a 9.65 acre . parcel at 8065 S W. Bonita Road (Wash Co. Tax Map 25i. 121 , Tax tot 500) ).2 Zone Change 2X7, 27-7, (Stoneridge) NI(, A request by Stoneridge Development Company for a preliminary plan an pr(.4ttam . review of , two phase residential/commercial planned development of an 8.:-1 acre parcel (Wash. Co. Tax Map 281 10A, Tax Lots 700, H0) and Wash, Co. tax Map 281 3D1), Tax Lots 801, 900, 110C, 1400, 1500) and a tone map amentkponi Emu R-10, "Single Family Residential" to Cf. "Commercial Professional" on parcels totalling 3 tib acres (Wash. Co. Tax Oap 281 31)D, Tax Lot 900 and the eastern portion of Tan Lot 1500) CEDConditional tse CU 3/-77 (Farr) NP0 e A request by Dave Farr for a conditional use permit fcr 12 duplexes in a R. i, Single Paoli]) Rosidentill , zone ot Stratford Subdivision (Wasl.. Co. Tax Map . 0 251 11D, Tax Lot. 1400) •• ' • . • • •, r . ?r. • , • AGtNDA TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 15, 1977 Page 2 • ' 5.4 Conditional Use CU 38-77 (MTI) MPO , . A request by Theodore Hunt (MTI, Inc.) for a ccndl iota' u.06 permit t, opc , an electronics assembly company in a M-4, "Light: Manufacturing", zon,J 5.51 acre parcel at 8900 Burnham Road (Wash, Co. Tax Mc,-r 281 2AD, T • 2200) 5.5 Conditional Use CU 31-77 (Tigard High School) (Tabled trom Novembr Ktian- ning Commission meeting) NP0 • . • • 0 A request by School District No. 23J for a conditiona 0. use permit for addi- - • tional classrooms in a "Ri,30, Single Family Residentiml" zone at 9000 S.W. Durham Road (Wash, Co. Tax Map 281 14A, Tax Lots 100, 101, 200, 1102, 120U 6. Other Btsiness •.. 74 Adjournment. • a • " • 41 '17 • • 4 • 41',• • "r.• 4! • ° , 4. ' Eat,u •Tt83z.- CVO-L-1---_..___ t V4\71-18 no. . o 'WS z t T Zit . .£LS 069S r S;trSL ty f i F- t t 1 ..r x 1 : c - 8 t' i • [ CS t _' `mac :'� 1 { A 1 1' si..„„.e ` w �t • 11 ' 0051: , zit - . - - I . . .! _ ,.. t 7r 99'e Q ' O EA•i TOSfi t�` i” ` - ..s , j .,LS'frsL - r LS'trzfr ; .N- N.. t -re-z- ar 10.171 '; SL. 1 1 to is q c k i — __1 � �” 1...-, ,QS£ I p 9 f :1700.92 I ".r.sc 6 =P•&O b! 10 51 t' 0021 00.17 1 :- 6S'frSL _ -27 ? •L 3,LSoi.:•S ,80'694 -, .r ,6II'941 xs.+- £0'v SL ,tzt--1 • Cfi t - t - m • t if.-, 1 j I _ __ _ _ __ — — _ — ,88.3SL a I t v - x to . 311 1 $Z vrgra { 0 TT i - ILIIY n_M t ,s •LBtrSL - H1 bah rc o — — 4.) 9 r 6: Zvy 411'4i ()001 COQ‘ ) Oci ( 00ci col jsr 012-c? ( )01 --f ) t 0-0121 1)-02 CH I 1S? C'D 1 ' IN pEVELUPM..NT CO .01.0994 1/76 'S111CD JU,uLU 10,000 26.000 SUMMLH,JLLU k PUUk-7 .012, U23/ A-213'18-2001 ROGLR5,MACHINERY CO '25112!1' ,i , �i.0 cqj AAN��Kh1N.4 N..0..1� p.• •0�tj�,ANS w- c,• r,t ' 460 0 •OR rA 97223 e 1 EVEL0PHENT Ift I 0`'3=011691 ,/ 6 I • 1 , ,. ,b•• `A' 4- P. 40• 0d3` A-2 b- 10 AMXb , • 2011'2^ 'a p IC,''.! -N-OEYYCL PPIOMIENT'CO' ON-, cF.1753- 1116 -51110 25,208- 25,,200 3„23 AC R-7P-D .002 0237 A»21375^2910 SNgT50,5JOHM2N0 PDf?TLiNn',Rp RC`.H19124 1/75 19112A ' l.s"' i�Atl/./1]kVCLO ME'NI C. C - 10 , a 1 w 11 a•,, r, 0 .w yr1 U A.41-311- dllYHl'k AG Q "h"22243 8112/ , , '°, 10 8W 116TH AVE TIGARD. ■•COON 072-. ' - ROOM 304 UNION 5TA'710N PORT ND. OR 97209 - �',H. L£3. EDWARD J GAN w•.G N - , _s111D 18,000 20,400 33,200 12.05AC RUN 1032 0230 A-21376-3000 PRE55NA�1., KENNETH 0 920-0328 5/73 29112A •- ri t H 5f1 7 A .TOWN HARJCTYA!"O'0 5W DQN I TA,RD 1 10°t'A fRg� : ot�1 ! GUAR 1 w r 0 , f .. OP ITI.'fi`7AG- HG4 . d -J2 = A» b-'/0Y SME.30 KL TI'N kA Tlt D 2 2A M 40 SW 5OTTLER RD TIGARD, • CGON 912'- 6030 5W BONITA RD-TIGARD, 0.00N 97223 4 ',-^EDWARD J 1110 5,000 19.100 24,700 ,30AC RU4 1012 0230 A-21370-3100 OEVURT3 FURNITURE COMPANY 1020-0719 4/75 251119 f'd',A�''y�IS rIL�U�TATTL,CR QR LINR l•.QON 47 ',,��__S�{1_N-Q R1 0 AYE PQRTA w F�9__2- f ' ,•p� w.0*.a Lt;'IVI NRY'L .. - 4 1 i 1'3'«3, .. ,•O tb. QO 9,l' C RU ell • 3' A dl ID SOITTNE N AC iC (-T56'il�`3%'1�i 251 1cJ� ,-:r•i•T SW HALL DLVD TIGARD. • 97t03 304 UNION STATIOW`pORTLAND, •R 97209 4,A t00,AOAE6 M KENNETHt ilot l 359 ,a/1Q -S1110 4,400 4,4DO 9.15AC RU4 0238 A-21370.3801 PREDEL1VCRY SERVICC CORP• 25112/ .�j 0 OX !919 DEARUO1jN, RICH. 4 0 1 tl _' ♦' ' I l 1 1•, O. , t, •:f l), i L ' Id 0 A-01376-300 + D AUTbH CO '8$112/ .,. , ��y tA.LBLDTIOAb • u �`1"� �, f HYLOKED EYG7 p11`0' iam.•ud3 `"3/75 �8111b 18,000 17.300 33,800 I0•04AC RU4 0238 A-21376-3610 60UTHERNWPACIFIC TIGARD, 0''• 30-0324 251121 • § - ,,• 5 • 5T VFs-.�11.Tli..0 aRFQQN 4719 ,. 301E UN,1.0w_g7 QNPQRTL.AND, .A.CPC7N.4 0 '''+.•• , tqy, ...tTLDkf:O�' Ff/`'3-b�Tf1 •,. ) 4,400 -MT ',-f0--'''�AC U4 , d •_ b A-c�l"uFd02101• to-1V4ESON`COMPKNY 105h-0 1 .11752S112A 1✓j ,(§, 41 4157 PORTLA 11) •Qlj •N_47.2.19. ICXo•'S VU y1', 7 P 0 00X 23343 PORTLAND, ORE..•N 07223 f ' 1D G,8tl0 17,200 24,000 71 AC R-7P-0 1012 0237 A-21381-0100 CLAVEPIE HENRY J 251121 7'`,'.•.1 �.4f ss,.a-�Gf�T7UNH ,, ,.AI'A.ti Li .. 0489 Q/71 511` 4 "01 SH.PONITA RO•TIDARD, 0,4 N_calpp -{ ' ,,.,',41K,,GEf31R�' r . •-0'IUt 10//1 -alt 15 11 ,90. 114,900 .9 AC R-7P- 4r. 02 A-21391-01U L.Ati-`TIT•,-HENRY J 424^0`2'2''3 2$1!21.! t ' . ttALATIN'OEVELOPHENT CO 1 3¢O SW ll TH AV. TIGARD, OREGON 97* 7615 SW OONITA RO TIGARD, O'-DON 9722 GEORGE CLARA C CK-1724 10/71 51110 54,200 54,200 7.53 AC R-7P-0 4002 0237 A-21301-0200 SNYDER, VERLCAH ARLENE 1010-0021 1'75 291121 ' Y itrw.A71N 17;M,¢PMFNT ,Ci J ,wcil,er.1 illt PQRT ANO 0•• 97 5 �775`r�W RON1TA TJOARD_y_,0,.f.L1N 97118.• . YLI GLURL, . CLARA-t- Cf=1194 10/15 �1�[5 . -L,•U• , 2AC 11/4 OE T A•013d1-U3UU 1•ILAEk.:-PA LINE 1106'-•0 45 677ri-zsTl•t1 • a ,.. A•UALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO 10300 5W I13TH E TIOA••• OREGON • 223 7829 RW BONITA no TIGARD, 0.97223 I..RI•'0w• A T 00010 E 5112A 110,000, 188,400 906,400 4.27AC 301, 0238 A-21301-04O0 WEAVER. PAULINE T 251121 3341 OHT_1,,AND ORE -N 070x 3 __ __ _ _.7 5_SW 9 117.^7 RD T I GARp_.-0' 0720°*„ :.r JH J-F"kYAL ?J1 �• 5•, -0 771,900 •4 hU.. ,..•A °i' 30I" 0d`• A-2'1391°4 ;Y -C. 0 r_ITA ,6,111 1 fit. DER LEGENDARY BLADCS 14 00 SW 72 • AVC ORTLAN , ORE00N 9 23 , 40P0 SW JULIA ST PbRTLANO, .'COON 912 I ,\T_\ ,SHAY DEVELOPING CO '011?A 0,600 2,300 11,900 .33AC H-2 3012 0230 A-21391-0500 KRUESE, ADRA N OENEVICVE 26112'1 J 4 v l-aA-M AIR CONTo01, 1,4,1 5W NO 7 .'1 OPF'G• N7 3 BOsn„..0W 1�Q=META R HOARD, 0••o ! 1 ? r, A4, S,SWA V. Olr1 NO co• m 3�TI TA ` a,J.. , ,j, ..- I,JOT, 00 I I:coA M-d '0 2 • -- A-A 13U 1-0 0• 0-HAL1..01aAN, TH0A1Ab M 4es-07149 -',A21 I24 ri WILLIAMS AIR CONTROL 14100 SW 1PND •RTLAF'. ORCO. 97223 15000 SW BEEF BEND RD 710AR., OREGON 223 y r10.L1AH6 AIR CONTROL 5112A 925,900 000.000 LEASEHOLD MAC! M-0 30122 0238 A-21391-0700 DURNS, RObERT W 962-0485 2/74 251121 , • ,n1nnLit.72Nb AVE•JUALATJN, R; RJ15 W_[30N1*,A Rp P7°1111-11' 37PO3 rwt 1''. �"j, ON 00 '1°'1'0, :.1x,`,..0•_.... 4m.,a4� NAi:F N lT'j • c b23d A»2'I EiIE(1T'00 l7°11 LORAIJ 1MOtfAi - -��'i!a-111. P 0 BOX 23343 TIGARD. 0R1;OOIY 97223 15800 SW BEEF DENO RD TIGAR.• OR 9122• _,,9T"f NLLOON COMPANY 1056-0240 S112A 146,700 140,700 5.28AC M. 4-4 3Ub2 0030 A-21381-0005 HANNA. NORMAN K 940-0090 9/73 251121 ,.•,0„••x;_2_343 PURT,kANP, 'O. N RIP? 1 6'0,5 SW RON TA RD tt0ARD, 0•_47,•• 3 ••lr, 'wk�,`?`NE:L`50N CTJMI AANtf " IO:.`b-tu' 1 S IdA--- 41,30 -• 41,'a•0 1.51^0 Nz2' woo Ur'U A+c132I-ot AA VTNI,Cr CONAWb J LUGS ANT,,-.10!1 -IdgiL. 1'0%'71}C'S'�1 F 0 BOX 23343 PORTLAND, ORC N 87223 ! 1 14010 OW HALL BLVD TIOARO, COON 9721.3 101 "4S NEL50N COMPANY 1055-0240 11/75 -9112A 93,100 93,100 3,50^0 M-3 13008 0230 A-21381-1000 Y0UN9, R L CONNIE R .151121 �._O Ff,41JOX 2'i ,4-1 f�Op7LANq• OR C�,fJ_9,7i'?,3 ,,,,,,-,,,, ,� �, ,,.,_,_1 _ 40�D rW_HWY 7 GAgD_,.QRFI _ _ • �- is ",'o i:M�+�faEPHW(9..` a 12A- - 110,200 113,650 IJ�,�J7�0 I.C'4AC M°. 0 d fJt-ff A°1:1301^'°llzr11 �Nl!��'�-Lt�AAL��"Et- IIUa�•-P2-�ll/70 c�'"l�t� I• J NW ,h:LINE OLVD PORTLAN , ORC00N 220 9900 5W 92ND TIGARD. ORCODN-7223 • Jz , !RS:N• H A LT AL 1014 0694 3/70 CIICA 11.200 23,300 I 93.500 2.53AC M-2 301? 0030 A-21301.1110 0-HALLORAN• THOMAS M 504,01 1 251121 • �, FP/ #T�4"0 1NC P O IIOX,4?!r0,>PORTI_A. QFE...�{_.�37201- 'a'- •.. _. �T, .._ - NOG F N.,ftpA Tlb D..0 ,47:7x .J r,.u.i JO�F.r3H'M'T.Y AL+` 11014-Obb4 ✓ J 51 2A d 0.960 1.1L`.1'b,.•0,. I,4c1�,d, 7,,,,, •-�' �3u1,: Ud7• A 21dd{«llc'U Y.1.-Y LiZ'A�` --")=JOLLY H""' `- 2:il ,1.FOUGHT CO INC 14255 SW 7-ND AVE P 'ELAN , OREGCt 97223 14160 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, • 0721'3 a 13HT auCOOPANY INC SIIMA 739,000 "39.600 MACHINERY : Eq H-2 O'30 A-'1381-1"GO 0-HALLO AN NEI.LIE 7 251121 Jc.err r 1.N 7a�.y t•, .. 47,r, .,,.• . 5012 k T. '-i K7NaOA COMPANY' ORCOO 9. -MP' /-h -SI 12A lti6°,lMi, , .6-07776C ,••• _j,.._.I4r N .,W_llk-,�l,�D T1,GApD, 1. ' ' � tc � 1'15�J 4�".5��""6 -3 S,".s Oc d A-u�11'=f'3"dU WASS1'N�`A1i;G�EkI�»D'P�1CL2_G`� Ludt=Oi a 2:i1121 1 3'G 5W RONITA RO PORTLAND, RCOON 97 3 I 14300 SW HIGHWAY 217 TIGARD, OREGON 97?23 ,,'7•MFr. RICHARD 0 913.0602 1/73 -5112^ 100,700 i08,700 3.00AC M-2 3002 1 0238 A-21391-1311 HODIO, JUNE 556-0019 , 251121 . . -,,S'lat'rX "3OF,O Pon11j419l ORE. fJ 1U?3 _ «_:-. . �.^._ _-...» , ;; J .�.�, Aa1�,FI 510 b;'1goYANp ORCO 9721.3, � � MAHGAHE`f�9 ••313LOE�iti: "/ ••.aylLA 04,00' 304,360 410,320 ....:.GAG N c 2ald „c�6 A �1.9,•i4hw HAA'a, NY.Tth1ATv�MA�Y"1fl,CLC � �Ilc� G 80X 32246 SAN ANTONIO, 1 78216 • I I 14370 5W HALL DLVD TIGARD, • COON 97201 t,,,7THERIJ YARDS 043.0080 Ii/13 `0112^ 153,200 443,000 596,200 B.DOAC M-0 .3012 0230 A-'1391.1900 GREATER N1W YORK CORD OF 900-0141!",4/73 251121 . r - w^0•:N I,ANWARk N P007 AM OR 4_'P _ - I _ k_N.I.F:ICy,31QNA1 __._QFJACE£..64..•,N_W14LA1$'f71'_, 1 POP: • 'II:} TZ`LAI G.-i--J.'--_•.•_.._1.-- #-0'4p-U L' -i'Y•r& - 4o M-D IJS,ftv 7' c'I71 J�1') -r.cOAC----•----1-�i�a®-I.rj.ld uc sd- A>Ci-:51f ft, U TfkUii`aE`AU, �IAL_L -E- -'-t1-i6� A ' •.'�7 6ETHLEHEN vat COMP 7300 IANDNARK Y T1 RD, OR 17223 1'101 5W MULTNOMAH OLVD NO 4 PORTLAND,!OR 9 19 ' 1- AAIt L Ff 465-0344 O{12A 10,750 13.400 32,100 11,47AC H.3 59032 7237 A-21381-1709 FIMMEL, RICHARD 0 013.0750■5/69 51121 'iv"�)4 N1YA_«RQ 110^5. 0 O,N 47?p Rgbl N� WAISEY_P�RT AND, Op nN g �lp, C Y tll S IEf�O'3TIb� uA' •- '-• "''U2AC M --13Tt`l A- �bi.1tt1'f3'MAM2ACFt�1`1AkOLU T1'1`R'�WClr x 104"3=-6Eg 17 a i c' a I JHOIA SUNDAY SCHOOL 791-0172 3/69-5112^ IIAC tl-3 31102 0137 7735 5W DURHAM Rh TIGARD, 0•.pON 0/22• „�f SW 80NIIA RD TUALAt11J• •R 97002 A-21391-1900 SCHMIDT, JOHN C JANE V 51121 • - 4L A NC H A 1 : ��'+�q� Our ?-aq-.-:-. ...62,'04' r''.:.4Q 4„iOFp. .DNAC. '21:-1----/P}'''. C 31 d31?5 SN R01{S TIQARD...ORJ_DQ1 7 53, ' II'-vEE''�1,41�`�A��-Tlta•bb-��16 : -.I.Mt� 10a`. 41A 9f .. - A-L�3°1!-:..0 6Yf:t:},j:°_ 1� _ - •�i�'c•'.1 . rT Dt CA"7INOS SIISA 111,900 I3!,200 MACHINERY : C. 3012 0237 14805 W DI81 TIGARD, OREGO 07221 ,, x7413 SW 00N TA TIGARD, OREO• 97223 A_"1391.21OD DABIN, CHARLES J "S1122 , f.�1_�� T p� Y PA D. ,..1.2.0 00 rF O . 0.A. A 1.17 G? 1 4 ?fl�i,1 t' 5T . R. ... .0 0 J v 1a$N TIUAk(s, al w•f 2 T �,. A- : . O.. , }: G T•1-g -ON. ROBIN K 5112A 0,300 14.000 21,200 1.67AC MAI 1012 0237 61105 SE RAMONA ST pORTLAND, •RCGON 07290 -. . 1`.45 5W 44TH AVE TIOARb, OF ON 0722• A-21301-2300 CRISMAN, JAMES H REBECCA -5112' C i9.• MARS RRS_¢�lD4 R A 4,100 4 Or ." •:3 4fi3r 0 '`T: I A 0 • GOt 7f"ti., Aj ., r vet' Fi1;O OF1ut Fi 938J:TT`i t7t{`PO.iiCA fY3. 0 07 3 -_ ilg C A A-•?13th-2 , M LL' 111M c . 900 n7, j P P.RXINDALE, MARION 1044-0006 9/70 811441,-3 10,000 10.500 3,53AC HAl 4002 0231 0901 NE HALSEY PORTLANb, OR •ON 97220 y " } ,,.x91.8. GF:OpGE R 9320 5W'4TH PORT. D• O' A-21301-2500 FIMMEL, R1'CHARD 6 991.0905 11/73 "5112 n 1T''t P R1.'7 Y J VW-U54 5/ - A . ,, • 1112-Q- 4 .0 NN R K 4 I- '' 1 R 0 J H/, S •I7` A r •R ON , 1 ;y > NW bNA ZlR PbW N E, G1tCtlfi- p• a: A-2�'i11�ij9G0 t1»NFLCt1K�N�i i w• I Ub.'�-779 b � R3 VIICTOR C 900-0023 1/74 .9112A 0,300 0,000 15,100 FANNO„REEK A■ MAI 1012 0237 0 FIMMEL, RICHARD 0 0901 NE 1ALOEY P0'-TLAND• OR 9 • o•,, �.1, .,1411,`'1'7100 AVE IIIIOARD, 0,i 004--97220 Q/7: _ 1} A 0 7 . 4!f 1O A. A , 1 A-21391-2700 CAOE�,�CLkirFr00�RN C W . f1 1100-0143 =8/70 SI l2 «`4,J1AdFi OTY■aptly H I r-'1'f:a.mod f•J-FJAk1LT Y'�11 AI<E 050 • - - A. 1 • !,- w EK,ri., TFIOMJS • 94tl-.1. 9 . ,i 'T Y;JAL OAW CO 001.055'2} 12/70 -51.2A '40,100 100 40,200 1.04AL MAI '3002 0207 0040 SW 00NITA RD t10AR0. 0'••OON 0722• . `•r, , HARVEY t 4005 04 0E•,ARO DR P. TLAN., 00E00 97201 A-21391.2000 LEISC'4, ANNE 1031.1037 1/15 -5112 JO ': NA11 RAW / . A •.7'• ., •, . ,,- I 1 g� ��I 1'1�.T10ARO. ORE00 •7p 3 u K11r:1�HA�EY�-: .,, kD�O �. _.�'; .. , . • �il _. A. _ ` -OCTFFaR6 G 1•ti�, : 4 M -' FOKCST OR 9 1074-0725 12174 -0112^ 20,000 100 27,000 FANNO CREEK A. 3002 0237 A-21301-3000 MAOKINNDN�NDAN 0LJ1HACMABLEnaJfi09-0090 9/72. 901111 }� �1qb t;''F-1UA 33 T I O1ftD. Uf . �4 ... _ •w . : I . • .. . ^•,.71301:3 ., , 4. •. 11.22 O WIN • , r 4 , ' PAL 5AW COMPANY 07,200 114,500 101,700 2,14 AC 3012 0238 6405 SC RAMONA ST I•�R IAND, .REOON 07-00 /' ',a to 60;1 1'3333 t I OARb. OREbb 972'.3 TT ' nL-itu f Al 0. NEELY. EtlNARD C VCNIT1 ^511 �• (• + J b,;'x 0•33 Mill . " " ., w« . w ' Mil L . ' A-. . -3205 S ,4' t " .k.:BM B ' `,•1.°'-C•2JOHN • ,1040-0401 • -0112^ 17.100 11,700 ,47A0 HA1 3004 0030 14906 114 01ST AVE T10AR0, 0''ODN 9722' • ^ko1N . TH HA9EASlbI ., I'M'7"1 6113 5112^ 79.700 317,000 3,:t34,,1,0,0 A 2,17^0 MA 8 2 0230 A-21301-3400 Y09b4'TLTCR• ERVINA4 - C.1 y • _Sll '' '•,,';9',,q 9N 1200 PORTLAND, 0R ' 223.,,1 1 1 A-21301-3050 ANDYKE}SR LF9;ARDAVt. 71 1 ARD• 0•'DLN-9022 1/70 911} Z a 'G i 6b A- F d 51 rPA 4.".!100 l,•3. 5n gRAP H='1 '14 l' 0R30 14nr5•4W'IaTW p 1' r DI� Iq g5g1Uy4. ..... , ' y ,• ' ',, 't • 9 . • • • V v , ■ • a • • 1 • , • , Ir y , -`ft ` , • e' r1 HARRIS-MCMONAGLE ASSOCIATES ENGI I ERB•s RVZ YoUS 80015 S.W.OOi '1ME1ROIAL STREET TIGARD,OREGON 97223 TEILIMPrnox r (503)4330-3458 October 19, 1977 Mr. Richard Bolen Planning Director City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: STRATFORD CONDITIONAL USE Pursuant to Section 18.84 of the Tigard Code the following is submitted as support Jata for this request. 1. The duplex use is compatabl e with the single family homes proposed and provides a buffer to them between S.W. Durham Rd. , a major arterial and also the commercial area to the east of Stratford. 2. This request is in conformance with N.P.O. q #5 housing guide lines for diversified housing to the demand of utilizing the urban ground available to its s best potential . Very truly yours, e . L. McMon Pooler Harris-Mc ,ran•g e Associates WLM jc Ammimmiimi �.. T , J r4., ...... 1 ':'k'.,..n.-dii- .. ... Iraa.a•.. m .e .. . .. .... .. ... ... WRIMINMINNIMIR.Nia.....11W110,■11.5MMUIRImen asi................ WINNi •. . 6 ■ ■ e ;.„: . .. f•J - Ow:::'i ' 1 C`N A l'.. . ..IF - l'•''., *, 1 ....\( 1. • Il \111('EA):‘,, '.-1,, - N. '." .. ' , ■ .■. `,1 , ',..• ... l''''q I..; ..14 ' .:..i'...',' i i. CU ^g*-7 - -/1 ' ''' '• .. ., , . . . . . . *- . fi. . . I 'PI,!CA'l 11.)1; ....ii ,..1-1 T)i ',‘,.1 1 1 ' I.t:' (". . . i , t.,. i I 0.1 ();-;;) i ; i 1 .1. 1 ii :.. I . , i , ...i f.ci , C.i;■.; at. (.4 . ...?, R. c.c. irlt g / 7 P. 7 s r,f,i t(., Reo (i . /a/...27/77 7....;y /g ...... )1,2,, , , A .t i I til ril.:11,tfc..s t r,ci i'li'i .A ':.. i.I' Ll \ 1 et.'..-.1)."‘ 1:\h ' )''' '' 1.1."(1.':2t Hrrt'''c CI ' -1'5— c2-'—' . . . ,. ,. ,.. . ., ... • .. , . ...,...0 n t. ' ',.':il I.c, 1p „)1" „.67/9vate:, 711 ,!,,„.,e7Fa.--Lc2, 7cf3 , . r . . ' ;,),`, ■ .ti,-...t ' .- A(icl 1.(',-,s eepoiti ,d,..-/.04),. ,..,5,---.4-4 ,---,.. :‘,.(523.477....0.,-- 4.,_ _., , 7"-7ea," . . ( •11 1"( ('t (-4:'i 1 :. ) I . t , : (" ) ( 1.1 . ..',, • k%■C Tic 1" ' c.. ‘: :MC' 44PA2*‘ ...e /01,11-elea - T'11,- . . • ..1 ........•••••A••-• r A.,.1. ...I ••• • •■• , O., . • • . , , :' I . 1 ' ,-, . ,i,,rt . . ( ,4 i 't ) . ( CI 11 :\' ) k L'„ 'it f' ) • . :j i'l ;I t.‘1111. is . ( ■: 0 (*1' XL .11,1 T'fiC t 1101"k0.is:-Ori 4. t",.'f- ii):'k-IY' - . - . , ' ' . . 011.1 .r . • • ,... i•„tle.r Req. 0,.-n 1 1. irin ()I ;11'1'i i , - . ' , n . ,. . ., .., It tt . .ttt 6 .i . . . . ■ S' : t I:1 t ':t'(' , . k '` ' ' • :. ' • ■ ..e' . • . 1 "..-(,n •.'..pc.n.,-.1r f ur ;1113- 1 i■ ,:.,1 .e. fr 487ev5- 4.C.'e'14 )' eo-or-loWee44.01 ,.6.7"- 07.7.44t4r.... ?.,. _ .4-i .. ..- . . ;'e a,. r t ) ( L' i t y) ( st itt c) I. . .. . .-944ti* 11D.. # fr i j, I, ii; hi'., g.*.n j .-zse:lim, 4,.. 1 a X 1,c it( '-,) / 7 r .5"/4' /4..4.) . " a r'(''sil/ 0,/gmle8 4,,e5-*/7"-els$7074,:ae"...." ,...rekf,a44).1,-,c,,e, ,1.,-- ,Ai.on, ,, t. ..., > . ..it.i lig flu , 1 ri,1 1 ,.,,s ( # a rid I ,A 11.' . ..... . ... ,'. , 4 "I,t.rc,-tit 'i'cirl Dip, / -.. e" c i,,/ ri.11 t 11 c.;(.. 4),,t,,,,geoe .494.4:-.44', e•-i",„,41,4r-v-i. . ,. '' , , i I t,a ri 1 ' s r,1 /,,,,,,, t .. lir,',..14 i i ..?1 W'1. 1*j. Pleifir''' . r'", il(1, Z*q.1 - H 10.1,1 S I ON 'r 1.1 , c, p..(1)(11.i ",-,-.i.!,(.; " 1 !VILNTF ; ' 0 :''t 1 Sii c? Dr. .k t,li.:i.. lit ; ; ;in . . ■ . iliftV tc' „v . 7, ,,i A , ' . . ,_. , • , . •, • • I. . , •,. • ----------111111111111NIMMINIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIININIIIIINIIMINISIEllI ,. • . t • . . .,.. ,..: CITY OF TIGARD - -. P.O.Box 23397 ' 420 S.W.Main,Tigard,Oregon 97223 ... ., .• . 0,-4ttA, Agnes1s44 Miller C) 10380 S.W. Sattlex, Rd, Tigard, Oregon 97223 c'..' ) , . .. ■ 1 • I - 1 . # • 1 • , 1 , , ..• , .1' • • • i • I , , .. ".. \ lit • ' . •■ , 1 • , Olt , .1i) ..4 • .. A • • •, ., e • i , .'• , . • . 'I I • ' • • , x . ., A', • i . I y G CITY OF TIGARD P.O.Box 23397 • .420 S.W.Main,Tigard,Oregon 97223 1 t , Kennet L. Miller 8 350 S W. Sattler s.d. i. a • Tigard! Oregon 97?23 1 • 4 ' a. .6 r ; ,, 4 . • L.. a % t n I. 1 n 0 i y , , b w 0 1 .t, • Is it 1 . ..... MIIIIIMINNI1111110. . . ,. . . .... ..■...--.---.1fiiiiiiiiilli , ...... . . , ,• a '• ' 4.•f• • . . .. • , 't .•''. CITY OF TIGARD P.O.Box 23397 , • ,420 S.W.Main,Tigard,Oregon 97223 . , . \ 4'42 N.,tlivir, , \ '4.;>••• 4%, ,..-- , • \ Tualati Ney;elopment Co. ... ol One S. f . ,p6lumbia (0 Mod, lt,it. iio (Ric L4 . . . Po . an , Oregon 97258 Li No such nunitp . . tli Movod,not forward, • . . . ..1 VI-Addressee unknc.w., rk7\ , „ \ 6 4. do,c„..5 III ft, • ' CI N r) 'I.1 C'',1 0 U'11'; ''.,,. n .0,4 • . i ' ' ' 1....... f...,..., ' 1 . , .. . . • . • . • . • 0 •.* . ° '• . . . ' • i • ' 1 • • '0. b. • . k . . . 00 . .‘• . ' . . .•',., '., • , . . . • , ' '• .4 . • ' •el . '.'' •.1.1 L , . ... r•. ..• , • ) • ° . • I • • • . . . • ..••' ■• . r N. .I • ,, '• ( 1:11 4, ■ f I . • • ..''' ' . '. • I . • . I • , • • .I. ', I . • , . o .. • i • M A. 0• o i - 5.71 1/4 CH .754 37 -. n 1 - .- a� ' 11DD s 1 ' 2S 1 11C s.Isa� r . t I I i, - . 1 Df fi • tau - ,ai, 754.56' Q t_ AI 4 i ' 7 rl 1 in 4. 1 1 ' r { ': L'^121' 754.05 755E19.. 569.06' 1 569.57'£ 573 759.4 - 754_59. 1501 1400 I 28.00A0. .: 1300 R..71 - 18.84-4r. 31.1.5 aG 1. I , i I 330' 1 1 f 0. - _ 75 1401 _ `;1 .1 Cr i 2 o n - '?AC a. ID N N 11:1 - _O f_.: to:- (24_87' i o . ' - 754.87 `° — 3" 1301 —) N O ai S - - I - r t i � '`Y - �o.a 112 g- ! f- L� �t SL• I 1500 ��:.. ' - `_ • R! 111 -. y',2 yy 1: I N N 3 I1 60 1 565.08' 573 r 112 f .. 754 87' a s S.M. < n DU R HAM _ R 4.1.1'.- _ R OA Fs 1. R 42. z�------r �. - _-- -_II