Loading...
SDR1990-00018POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. AFF IDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard I, \Auh\ .., being first duly sworn /affirm, on 'oath'. depose and say: (Please print) 4ektAi- for That I am a �fJ1 The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, FOR: That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR _ City of Tigard Planning Director --I,: Tigard Planning commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy Hearing Decision) attached (Marked (Public Hearin Notice/Notice of Decision of which is Exhibit "A► ") was mailed to each named persons at the a• dress shown on the '%� r e �� . 19 said notice NOTICE OP e�hibxt "B" on the � � ',day of � list marked .�. � d, " w hereto att ched, was a ,ed on an appropriate attached aF bulletin board on the 3EG_STda ao£ '. 1 VAM. , l9 g0 ; and deposited ed States Mail en the day c Y in the iTr.�� ._.i..� �' f . �� "' 4 . , 199D � r postage prepaid n Parson who delivered to POST OPPICE Subscribed - sworn/affirm _ day of NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON Hy CommisSion Expires: CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - By MANNING COMMISSION . Concerning Case Number(s): PDR 90 -0007 SDR 90 -0018 VAR 90 -0024 . Name of Owner: Coast Finance, Inc. Name of Applicant: Same Address 11205 8W Summerfield City OR Zi Cit Tigard State p 97224 . Address of Property: West of 11205 SW Summerfield Drive Tax Map and Lot No(s).: 2S1 10DC, tax lot 600 • Request: Planned Development detailed ,review /Site Dev �am eloent Review a2proval to al loco construction a 20 unit retirement complex in an '`R -25 PD) zone. Al.sE rectuested is Variance appproval. to allow reducing the number of covered parking spaces from the c o v e r e d 8' d. s aces. ZONE: 'S-25 ER Residential, 25 unitJacre L Planned Development . Action Approval as requested Approval with conditions' Denial . Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall, and mailed to X The applicant and owner(s) X Owners of ; � � guired distance X Th e affected cNo�ghborhoodhE +lanxiiing Organization X Affected governmental a.genc ies • Final becis3on.,' THE DECISION S13(ALL 33E FINAL ON link ASS AN APPEAL IS FILED The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtait,ad from the Planning, Department, Tigard City ' Hall, 13125' S'W Hal 1, P.O. raox 23397, 'Tigard, Oregon 97223. pea; e Any party to the decision may ppe.al, this decision in a wrdtten with 18.32.290(33) and Section ) te 1r8.32.3 70 be sled da 1s whic a pz r s o s vgiidvees n and a P P sal ma Y be submitted o n City P o r s accom an iseed a P eal fee' ($315.00 ) and transci t c oat h o Ivarie a maxn tibm. y u lt tTOf' $500.00) The deadline for fili.itg of an appeal air 3O p.ni. 1' 10, Questions:, If You have any questions, please call the City of Tigad Planing Department 639 -4171. blurt /sDR90-18. aiCM'` CITY OF ''TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL 'ORDER NO 90-21 PC A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WHICH APPROVES AN APPLICATION FOR A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR 90-0018), PLANNED DEVELopmENT (PDR 90-0007), AND VARIANCE (VAR 90-24) REQUESTED BY COAST FINANCE, INC.. The Tigard Planning Commission has reviewed the above application at a public hearing on September 4, 1990. The Commission has based its decision on the facts, findings, and conclusions noted below. • FACTS • General Information CASE: WILLO WBROOX ARMS RETIREMENT APARTMENTS Site Development Review SDR 90-0018 Planned Development Review PDR 90 -0007 Variance VAR 90-0024 REQUEST: 1.' Planned Development detai;_ed review /Site Development Review of a plan for development of a 20 unit, single building retirement apartment complex on a 1.5 acre site. 2`. A variance to Community Development Code Section 1E8.106.030 to allow a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces from the required 20 to a total of 8 covered spaces. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium-High Density Residential ONING DESIGNATION. R- '25(PD) (ReSidentialt 25 unite/acre, Planned fanned development overlay).' APPLICANT /OWNER Coast Finance, Inc. 11205 SW 'Summerfield Drive Tigard, OR 97224 ARCHITECTS Pete Melin Melin and Associates 265 Commercial Street SE Salem, OR ",'?7301 LOCATION: West of 11205 SW Summerfield Drive (WCTM 251 1DDC, Tax Lot 600). 2 Eackcround Information 7 P Hated by the Com rehensive Plan Pap The sub'eCt Parcel has been de�ig � p FINAL ORDER 90-21 PC SDR 90.0018 COAST FINANCE PAGE ] is for high density residential use since 1982. However, an error was apparently made in the maps prepared for the 1983/1954 Plan and zoning map revisions that resulted in the 'parcel, being spliLt- zoneol with the eastern two-thirds of the parcel ' designated R-25(PD) and the western one-third designated C-G (PD) (General commercial, Planned Development overlay). On June 10, 1990, the Tigard!. Planning Commission reviewed a request by g correct this mapping error. Thos Planning the Planning Division to c Commission approved rezoning of the western one -third of the parcel to R- 2c(PD) Vicinity Information The area to the west and southwest of the subject parcel is zoned C--G (PD ) and is developed as the Willowbrook Business Park. A portion of the parking area for the business park is intended to serve as the access to the proposed ' a artment P com p ' lei. Access to this hi s parking area from SW Summerfield Drive is through a driveway that is sha:reai with the Summerfieid Clubhouse Estates Retirement Apartments. The Shurgard rage facility is located immediately nr.�rth of the subject property. ssie self-storage parcel zoned C -G (PD) . The Su;mcnexf elci This arcel is also Clubhouse Estates apartments to the east are zoned R-25(101:1)- Site Information and Proposal . ;)eacription The site is undeveloped and is covered with low grasses and 'weeds. There is a slight slope to owardss the southeast g p The applicant reguests Planned Development Review /Site Development Review approval. of a regiest to develop a single building, 20 unit retirement apartment complex on the site. The proposed bui1d1,rdg would be an L- shaped 2-,story building to be located on the ncrrthern portion of the site. ,A ,parking lot with 22 parking spaces would ibe provided on the souther portion of the property ass illustrated on the site plan. In addition, ; fix existing, parking spaces in the parking lot to this south' shared With will the Willowbrook l3ussinesss Park. 141004 two parking spaces be could be located' in the northeastern ' corder of the site These parking spacers would be provided access by the ct -avel drive from . tre east on the Sunimerfield clubhouse Estatesl. parcel. This dri'Ve would also provide access to the apartment building 'S basement fcur golf cart storage The proposed building and parking areas will be surrounded with landscaping as illustrated on the landscape plan. Sidewalks will be provided along the eastern border of the site, as well as frcihn the parking area to the building. Signs would be located on walls on eithe r side of the entrance drive to the. site. The Walls wouuld, ;be construct ed Mod stone with the nA,rne of the retirement„ compi✓� in "' x listed braasss letters . The Signs will, r y the public tight-of-way. visible from o be red it v�.sz.b 1?I AL ORDER 90_21 PC SDR 9.0 -0018 COAST FINANCE PAGE ..x Agency and NPOComments The Engineering. Department has reviewed the, proposal and has provided the following comments • Access to S.W. Summerfield Drive for the proposed development would be through an existing fully improved private driveway on an adjacent parcel . Sanitary sewer and storm drainage service would be provided by existing lines in S.W. Summerfield Drive. Services to the p be provided by extending private lines from. the develo reset would b site through the private drive. c. The _ Unified Sewerage District has established, and the city has agreed to enforce, (Resolution' '90 -'43) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the 'construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their construction. 'Requiring surface water quality facilities on small sites would result in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the City. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities and there are no natural depression or other areas of this site that are particularly suitable for water quality facilities. Regiona?. facilities, funded by fees in lieu of construction of these facilities would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and less maintenance. Consequently, a fee in lieu of the construction of on site water quality facilities should be assessed. The Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District has commented that the radius for the proposed turnaround in front of the building must be increased to a 25 foot inside radius and 45 foot outside radius in order to provide an adequate turnaround area for emergency vehicles., In addition, an adequately sized turnaround for , emergency vehicle use must be provided at the i gravel road in the M terminus of the ravel access' northeastern corner of the Elite'. Alternatively, the site plan could be, revised toro oprovide arkin his existing roadway +to be exten ect p p p g This roadwa is necessar dfor emerge with the y �: g ncy vehicle access to portions of both the proposed complex and the existing Summerfield clubhouse Estates complex. The Uniform Fire Code requires that fire apparatus access be provided within 150 feet of all exterior Portions of a building and that the accessway either be 'a through road or be t provided with an appropriate turnaround for emergency v&hicies. The subject roadway was required as a condition of approval of the building permits for the Summerfield Clubhouse Estates apartments. The Metropolitan itpan Area Commui� r � ) p s:ca.ta.ons:t Commission (cable television has install two 2�inc, � P spective � P, h schedule 40 PVC conduit+ at all et develt�a er i and hras re ested that the prospective reef Groesin s in reviews the ro Deal a g ` installation. order to accommodate ca?�le t,�elevision The ` ' g ; MrO 6, Tigard Water District and PGE havo Huild.n bi�tision FINAL ORDER 90 21 PC - SDR, 90-- 0013 COAST FINANCE PAGE 3 - reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. . ANtA.LYS I S R-25 Zon,_±ina: District Multi- family residential use of this site is a permitted use in the R-•25 Bonin district. Twenty dwelling units are proposed_ on an area that provider an opportunity for approximately 35 units. Proposed site 3mproverents comply with the R-25 district requirements for building height (45 height proposed), lot coverage �&.� foo•G maximum allowed; 25 foot maximum (maximum allowed site coverage of 80 percent, proposed site Coverage of less than 70 percent), and landscaped area (minimum landscape coverage of 20 percents proposed landscape coverage of greater than 30 percent). The p roposed building location satisfies minimum building setback requirements. Site Development Reviews The proposal complies with Community Development Code Chapter 18.120 (Site Development Review) � ) for provision of private outdoor areas patios shared reo (balconies and } �andards for reation facilities (common recreation rooms within the building 'as well as the various recreational facilities inc:lue.. 4:44 in the 8ummerfield community), screening of service facilities, and design offsets along building faces. Other Site Development Review standards related to other Code standards are reviewed below. Landscaix The proposed landscaping plan provides adequate screening and buffering p p development and the adjacent acent commercial uses to the between the ro aged. dive 7 0 est y p Section 18.100.130 north: w and south. Communit Develo mint Code requires a buffer area of 1Q feet along this P ro F err Y' s boundary 'with commercially designated properties. screen consisting of a fence or a continuous vegetative hedge is also required. The proposed landscaping plan provided for a hedge of arborvitae to be combined with a number' of maple trees and Other vegetation y 'The " egetation to provide the screen and landscape buffer Code also requires' active areas such as parking or vehicle, acoe tsways' be included wit that no ac The ,landscaping, pin plan is . r area. requitement. � � the. buffs p g p i, consistent with hi qu` e addition, the plan 'provides for an adequate number of trees and lower level In g the parking area and surrounding the tre Vegetation w building so as to provide for a Plea Sant residential feel to the property. Parking The site plari provides for an appropriate number of parking spaces for a 20 unit apartment development (30 spaces required at 1.5 space per unit; 31 corner of the provided). s aces in the northeastern..... Site p spaces rov.de 4 Rowever� the two to are nob Basil accessed because of location of the s aces telative y f tie loc FINNAD ORDER 9h -21 PC SDR 50 0018 COAST FINANCE PAdE . rt 4 • (5) specified in the Code; and The' hardship is not self -i.mpr sed , and the,,, variance requested is the minimum variance which would a17 evia:e the hardship y The applicant asserts that retirement p residents typically do not • cement a artment �.es:�de have as many vehicles as typical apartment dwellers and therefore there is less need for covered parking spaces than the situation the Code is intended` to serve. The applicant. °s assertion is based upon the applicant's experience with managing Similar ^ retiretnent apartment developments. Staff concurs with the applicant's assertion based upon our experience with various developments in Tigard. The eight spaces proposed should satisfy the demand for covered spaces at most times of the year If the number of covered spaces meets the actual , demand for covered spaces for particular , p p a a p artment complex, the Code"s purposes are satisfied. In addition, as the applicant points out, there• are aesthetic reasons for g spaces to preserve more limiting the number and location o of the proposed development. g' neighbors order rs P p _ pent . Althoug es covered r� aces nor uncovered cars in a parking lot is not usually considered an a eal. uncovered iewa� for ns� i ��ak�o p eking �� r� y pp �. �,ng appealing v scene, the car s often would not be in the lot, leaving an open view of surrounding landscaping and buildings, whereas carport or gar=age structures` would always be there impactiitA.) the view. Because of shape parcel, the only alternative: to placing' f the. sha a of the areal additional carports or garages along the east side of the ,site adjacent to the Summerfield Clubhouse Estates apartments would be to place the parking underneath the proposed buildings Parking underneath the building would be Unpractical, because it would cause substartial additional ex p en se with, minimal if any benefit, , and basement parking also might require that the building's height be increased with resulting negative impacts on neighbors" views- The requested variance would not change uses, allowed on thin site. Because the requested variance would not al te:fr the total number of parking spaces provided - only the number of covered spaces - no impact on public' streets' or adjacent properties' parking lots would result from unsatisfied demand. Additionally, there would be no other known impacts upon physical or natural systems. F3ased upon the applicant d's experience with similar complexes, the applicant e eighspaces s of the complex d e residents adequately y and therefore, the variance requested is the minimum necessary to maintain an open Uncrowded living .environment for the residents of this project while satisfying the demand for covered Spaces. pp clue the number of covered Staff recommends approval of phis re es�t to th parking spaces from 20 t0 8 spaces. o reduce Access and Circulation The proposaa. satisfies Community Development: Chapter 8 standards for internal roadway widths mi zimurn width ofd 24 feet), number of ,.0 Y � � ; •case' points (l! required; 1 provided), and pedestrian circulation. The proposed turnaround circle in front of the building will provide an adequate FINAL ORDER 90.-21 PC SDR 5b--ooia COAST P/NANCE PAGE 6: to the street and because the driveway on the abutting parcel is gravel surfaced. These spaces should be replaced with an additional space in the existing paved lot to bs shared with the business park or else in a reconfigured parking area closer to the buildings. In addition, the applicant will need to provide documentation that a shared parking ` agreement with the business park exists for any spaces that are shown to be provided in the existing parking lot prior to building permit issuance. The agreement must sake it clear that the proposed apartments are to have access to these spaces at all times. The site plan proposes one designated handicapped parking space to be P main entrance to the a p artnent builda n g. Community Code Section 18 , 16o20. N.1 requires that parking are, s be provided with one designated handicapped parking space for every 50 standard parking spaces. The site p lan is consistent with this standard. However, the Oregon Revised Statutes have been amended to require additional designated handicapped parking spaces and a larger parking space effective parking spaces be that two disabled person September 1,, 1990. The amended statute requires that p provided for a parking lot providing 50 P Parking p n addition, the statute •re requires between 26 and e. total spaces. In disabled person Parking space be provided with a 6 -foot wide aisle on the passenger side of the space. The site plan will need to be revised. to provide an additional disabled person parking space consistent with the amended 'state law. The site plan proposes that eight carports be provided alon g the west Side the parking lot. Community Develo ment Code Section 18.106.030.A.4 requires one covered parking space for each dwelling Unit. The applicant requests a variance to this standard. The 'applicant's narrative includes a P the explanation quest. response onse to the variance criteria and an ex ' lanatior. of tees.' re Cade Section 18.134.050 provides the following criteria for allowance of a variance to a Code standards proposed variance will not be materially detrimental � 1 � The to the Cotrtp � P � ]� � of the purposes of thi0 Code, be in conflict with the olici es Ceverehens v Code, to a any other applicab p Community p . any other appl�icab].e � policies and standards, an Communan P .and to other properties in the same Zoning dietrict or vicinity. There are special circumstances that seist; which ate peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography cir other circumstances over 'which the applicant has no control, and which aree not applicable to other propertisO in .0rhe same zoning district; (3) The use prop osed will 'rc- the same as P' ermitted under tha.s Code and City standards will be Maintained to the greatest extent possible, while permitting some economic use of the land; (4) rxidting physical and natural systems, such as but not lin iced' to trafrid,- ` drainage, dramatic land forms or )arks will not be adversely aff=ected anymore than would occur if the development were located as (2) iNAL °RIDER 90--21 PC 5DR 90-0018 C oAgT rn ANc PAGE 5 and t4: adjust the parking space area to be consistent with Oregon statutes.. Although the plan does not provide for an appropriate number of covered parking spaces, as required by the ,;Coder the Commission shall approve the variance based upon the findings provided on pages 5 and 6 of this order. The, requested variance 'satisfies the approval criteria for a variance listed in Chapter 18134 (Variances). • Chapter 18.108 (Access, Egress and Circulation) is . satisfied because plan provides a and egress for the the site lan rr�vr.dPS for safe and effi.ca.en�. access proposed use and for general circulation on the site The plan provides for ` an adequate number of driveways and provides for safe pedestrian sidewalks through the site. The plan will need to be revised to provide additional area in the proposed turnaround for emergency veh',.cle access. G p Review) satisfied because the site access- • chapter 1k3.12.6 (Site ' Dewelo rnent iteview is plan generally provides for the proposed buildings and other site im rovem to provide for privacy and light for the proposed p tints so as dwelling units and to assure comp y ween. the proposed units atibilit between and adjac 71t uses. Adequate recreational facilities are provided for the proposed development's residents through membership in the Summerfield community. 3., Chapter 18.164 (Street and Utility Standards) will be satisfied upon approval public improvement plans for and constructi in of proposed sanitary sewer and storm sewer imProvementS to serve the site. 3 ▪ Plan Policy 2.1.1 is sati tfied because Neighborhood Planning Organization NILO #6 and surrounding property owners were provided with notice of the public hearing on the request including notice of their opportunity to comment on the proposal. 10. Plan Policy 4.2.1 requires that all development comply mply The applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. prospective develo er will be p required to submit an erosion control plan guaranteeing compliance with the erosion control standards for the Tualatin River basin as part of the grading permit submittal, and will be required to file accepted methods of erosion control throughout the development of the apartment complex. 11. Plan Policy 7.1.2, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 can be satisfied because aseur~ ~ante of extension of sewer, water, and storm drainage facilities to serve the development will be required prior to issuance of the building Permit. h pp has indicated that these facilities will be provided inconformity with city standards„ The Engineering Department and other reviewing agencies have indicated that preliminary plans for providing, these utilities are adequate. 12. Plan Policy 8.1.1 1s satisfied because the proposed development has direct d Drive, a fully developed major ect aoces�s to SW Summerfiea.d Ura. collector Street.- SW Summerfield Drive hash adequate reset *e capacity anticipated additional tra generated Yerated by `the to handle the ffic� load �z FINAL ORDER 90-,21 T l Pc - SDR 5a��?�l.a cc�AS x" . FzwAv!cg - PAGE 8 • 0 turnaround for vehicular traffic to the site including emergency vehicles if it is enlarged Rescue g d z.n size a� recommended by the Tualatin y atxn �Falle Fire and Res District. Because the gravel driveway on the Summerfield Clubhouse Estates parcel is g y e necessary to, provide emergency access to both the existing and proposed developments, this driveway should be terminated in an appropriately sized turnaround to accommodate emergency vehicles. Signt The site and landscaping plans show stone walla to be constructed on either side of the entrance to the proposed apartment complex. The name of the apartment complex will be placed on the wall in brass letters. Because the p Alex w.� p signs are not anticipated to be visible from a public street, no sign permit is required. ▪ FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The applicable criteria in this case are Tigard, Community Development' Code Chapters 18.56, 18.80, 18.92, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, and 18.164 as well as Comprehensive Plan Policies `2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1:2," 7.3.1, 7.4.4/ and 8.1.1. Commission The Plarining � reined that she p ro osal, with m inor modifications that should be required to be made prior to buildin g p ermit issuance, consistent, with able' portions Community is applicable upon the following rta,ans of the C Development Code based up a ingg findings: • Chapter 18.56 (R-25 Zoning District) is satisfied because the proposal conforms with ude, density, and applicable dimensional requirements of the .25 zone. is satisfied because the proposal • Chap (Planned P �, is to be • reviewed by the Planning Commission as required by the P d Development overlay zone. Provisions of the Planned 3. Chapter 18.92 (Density Computations) is satisfied because the site 'plan Provides an appropriate calculation of the permitted number of housing unite for this site and the proposed. _ development Would provide fewer than the allowed number of dwelling units. 4'. Chapter 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) is satisfied because plans for landscaping satief y Code re qzatemen is for minim um Site area landscaping, Perimeter bilffering and screenin g r a nd , Patking . landscaping. 5'. Chapter 18.106 (Off- street Parking) is satisfied because the site plan satisfies Code requirements for number o total parking spaces and parking area lighting'. sits The Will need eed to be revised to p rovide Cot one additional designated handr ca pp Pd P erson p ar kzn g s p ace FINAL ORDER 90 -21 PC - SDR 90 -0018 COAST FINANCE PAGE '7 W i ' proposed development. ▪ bEarqioN The Planning Commission APPROVES Planned Development PDR 90 -0007, Site Development Review SDR' 90 -0015, Variance VAR 90- -0024, subject to the following conditions and modifications: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED AND COMPLETION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT- . The site plan shall be revised as follows: to provide a minimum of two appropriately sized and located designated handicapped person parking spaces; MY • to locate all required parking spaces in front of the proposed building; c. to provide an adequately sized turnaround for the emergency vehicle access road in the northeastern corner of the site; to increase the inside turning radius, of the proposed circular turnaround in front of the building to no less than 25 feet and the outOide radius to 45 feet. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division, (639 - 4171). 2 . The applicant shall provide evidence of a shared parking '' agreement with the operators of the Willowbrook Business Park guaranteeing that a + , p g p at all timesss for the use of the two parki Building Division (639-4171). • The applicant shall Provide connection of ro osed buildings to the P � public sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division (639 - 4171). • Plans of the proposed privately operated and maintained parking lot and driveway detail shall be provided as part of the building permit submittal. The plans shall show the measured area of impermeable surfaces for the assessment of the required fee in lieu of the construction of on -site water quality facilities. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division (639-4171). • An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the building permit submittal. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans- Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989." STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division (639-4171). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE TSST7ANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT: 9. All landscaping materi als sh all l be ,installed as per the approved landscaping plan. All public improvements and other site improvements shall also be completed. Financial assurance of an amount equal to the cost of materials and installation may be provided assuring, completion all improvements within 6 months of occupancy. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry offer, Planning Division, (639-4171). THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE FINAL, DECISION DATE NOTED BELOW. It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: This City of - Tigard. day of September, 1990, by the Planning Commission of the e97-1 A. Donald Moen, President Tigard Planning Commission SDR 90-18 . PFO /D 1 FINAL ORDER 90 -21 PC - SDR 90 -0018 COAST FINANCE PACE 10 • !n' r+SA'r T.A COAST FINANCE, INC. 11205 SW SLTMMERFIELO DR TIGARD, OR 97224 PETE MELIN MELIN & ASSOC 265 COMMERCIAL ST/ S SALEM, OR 97301 MARK L. GRENZ 1155 13TH STREET SE SALEM OR 97302 STATE OP OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard depose and say: (Please print) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING es- ) I (kaiurv.- , being first duly. sworn /affirm, That I am a (c 71-2(5'4,4.4.4.71 . _ for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR. City of Tigard Planning birector ✓'Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings officer __.._. Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Exhibit °'A") was mailed to each named attached list marked exhibit "B°° on the said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto bulletin board on the day of _ in the United States Mail on the 1' " '"' postage prepaid. on oath Decision) of which is attached (Marked Persons at the address shown on the ,.-L-€4;...2...44'-'day o attached, was post' c, on an appropriate , 19 y and deposited day of •,S: , 19 , PreparsedNotice /Posted For Decision OnJyj ubscribed and Sworn/affirm to me on the P =rson who de ivered to POST OFFICE Subscribe d acnd sworn /affirm to me on the -- 19 I�g U day of N PUBLIC JOF OREGON M . °mm'ca:seion Expires: bkn /..11.1 FIDA V l ay of NOTARY PUBLIC OP OREGON My Commission Expires NOTICE O F P U BL I C HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS, MEETING ON TUESDAY, September 4, 1990, AT 7 :730 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC Sete CENTER, 13125 SW HALL 'BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON,, WILL CONSIDER' THE, FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE Na. PDR 90- 00 ©7 /SDR 90 -0018 /VAR 90 -0024 FILE TITLE: Coast Finance, Inc. NPO NO.:, APPLICANT: Coast Finance, Inc. OWNER: Same 11205 SW Summerfield Dr. Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PDR 90-0007 SITE DEVELOPMENT .REEVIEW SDR 90 -0018 VARIANCE VAR 90-0024 COAST FINANCES INC. (NPO #6) P p toa allow construct construction of a 20 unit retirement Development Review approval. Develo went detailed review Si remcnt complex in an R-25 (PD) zone. Also requested is Variance approval, to allow reducing the parking spaces total of 8 number aces. ZONE: R-25 (PD) Reside P ,. � the required 20 to a covered of covered arkin � aces from C ntial,� 25 utnitc /acre Planned Development) ' LOCATION. West of 11205 SW S ummerf eld Drive (WCTM 2S1 1ODC, tax lot 600) (See Map On Reverse Side), THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER, 18.32 OF THE COMM?JNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY YSET E TIGARD CIL AND AVAILABLE AT , RULES of CITY COUN AVA T CITY IYAI,L OR PROCEDURE IN CHAPTER 1830. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER MAY IMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE . RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER PRECLUDES ATTEND AND Bk, ENTERED INTO THE RECORD OF THE HEARING APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO PECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TCODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A C` 'ONT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. poR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT' AT 639 - 4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) # 6 6 CHAIRPERSON: ;Sue Carver SDR90.;,:,18BKM PHONE I 11.: 639- 8807 d4. -QUE . S THE FOUNTAINS AT ` SUMMERFIE! D CONDOMINIUMS 2S11ODC -00200 •w••o• s••J•w • MCMILLAN, MARIE S % DAVIDSON, WILLIAM G 12830 SW PACIFIC UWY TIGARD OR 97223 2SI10DC -00400 ............. DURHAM / 99 ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY CARL MARKS REALTY SERV 77 ` WATER STREET NEW YORK CITY 2SI10DC -00600 COAST FINANCE I 11205 SW TIG �• 00!0.0 • . NY 10005 RPIELD DR OR 97224 2S11ODC- -00800 FARWEST ASSOC SUMNERFIELD TANGLEWOOD ASSOCIATES PCM ASSOCIATES 400 SW SIXTH AVE, #1106 PORTLAND OR 97204 » • 00:0» w.• • . COAST FINANCE, ITC • 11205 SW SUMMERFIELD DRIVE TIGARD, OR 97224 SUE CARVER 10155 SW ` HOODVIEW DR TIGARD, OR 97224 2S11ODC- 00300uti »•» »,.••.. ••i•••s LStIURGARO INCOME PROPERTIES TEN 1201 THIRD AVE SUITE SEATTLE 2200. WA 98101 2S110DC- 00500 ...... ... .... LUTON, ROBERT! C BY TUALATIN 'DEVELOPMENT CO PO BOX 8041 BLACK BUTTE RCH OR 97789 2S11ODC- 00700 ................•••• COAST FINANCE .ING 11205 SW SUMMERPIELD DR TIGARD OR 97224 o • •..r • • 2S115A0.03101 WES•I'WOOD HOLDING CORP 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND OR 97201 { CITY OF TIGARD, QREGOPI SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION, CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 I. GENFaAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION G +' r yCi -427,-/c7 TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. e / / C TL 600 SITE SIZE 1, A, x. PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* Cc FtP\ J 1 C ADDRESS 11 L.o Sw p F WPHONE 2) I O cITY co ZIP 1-12214 APPLICANT* ADDRESS PHONE CITY ZIP *When the owner, and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession With written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written`' authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application . PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review a proval. to allow: T L 0524P/13P Rev' :d 5/87 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE N07/2. c; � OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY DATE: 0-21 Application elements submitted: (A) Application form (1) (B) Owner's signature /written authorization (C) Title transfer instrument (1) j (D) Assessor's map (1) (E) Plot plan (pre—app checklist) (F) Applicant's statement (pre--app checklist) KH: TM4W. MW 1*AM4flWM'Idup1''�!'.,�YMIS. M� !"'1t4iDrpM M'M'" MC�M FHriMiLN7 '�'' adcrresses wj th�.n`2`5"O'' 'eet i) /i /3 (H)' Filing fee (t ) % ,00dfl Construction Cost Estimate DATE DETERMINED' TO BE COMPLETE: FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: OMP. PL /ZONE °DESIGNATIIN .PO: Number Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Planing Engineering . List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions ActiED to be considered as part of this application: S".; • Applicants: To have a PP complete application you will need to submit attachments P described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. • THE APPLICANTS) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: The above request does not violate any deed restrictions _ that 1may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknovledge that any permit issued, based on this a lication, may be revoked any such statements are PP ed if it is found that an s false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or, denying the application. • DATED this ! c c SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property: (KSL pm /0524?)' ly WILLOWBROOK ARMS RETIREMENT AP'ARTMEN'T PROJECT Covered Parking Variance Request Our request; is' to reduce the nu.m'ber, of required covered parking',. spaces from the required 20 to a total of 8 covered spaces. The granting of this variance to the code will not he detrimental to any purpose of the 'code. Al The proposed. use ` of the si to is for a retirement apartment style' av n '. The n,umberl of drivers in this living . environment i.s much Jess that in a standard apartment. retirement ' crmpl that is adjacent t:o this project, under' the same ownership, has l54 apartment units, 75 parking 'spaces and presently a total_ of 24 resident cars. This is one 'car per every 6 units. B; The topography and shape of this site have dictated the iodation of the project elements, such as parking` Because' 'of the site configuration we would have to ,Place, covered parking spaces aloa g the south side Of the site« This area is adjoined , by .the' retirement apartments to the south The l a � cement ova the covere& spaces :141, this area ,will _ effect the view from those unit;: '. iii that area. Given the fact that these residents spend a.! great; deal of time in ;their, units, their view is important, The owner of this isite also owns that site and is concerned about the livability for both. These circumstances are not Happlicshie' to other properties in tile' R-25 zone with standard younger residents, C The granting of this variance mi i.i. no change the use', df the property'', from that allowed, in the R -25 zone. All other r /equi.remrsen'ts 3 he met ors the s:lte B , The gran t i.ng off` this variance will not adversely affect any of the physical or na•tu.rai., system on the site and' differently than' wou.d t;he same aevei.opment without the variance. rs the need `or the vsari ante i rea'ted by trhe site constrains and the desire to 'maintain a good open living environment for the res' �t asp well as those °t o the south. �.der�Yl;s of 'this project This variance .s the :,t(1 SsarY as determined by the applicant .o reach hays goal and maintain good i iva'k i .i.ty for a ix tired i A.i Y/ � d elderly residents �� WILLOWB OOK ARIAS RETIREMENT APARTMtNT PROJECT The project will consist of 20 apartment units for retirement living. The required number of parking spaces win the on -site spaces along with a reciprocal parking agreement with the Business Park area to the West. be Provided by way of All the parking will be within 200 feet of the building as required by code, The code requires that an apartment project is a R -25 zone providing one covered Parking ,space for each living unit. It is the intent of this project to provide a total of 8 covered spaces rather that the required 20. We are therefore, requesting a variance znce to the requirement of one covered space per unit. d1 ' h 0 . 2S11ODC- 00200 MCMILLAN, MARE S % DAVIDSON, WILLIAM G 12830 SW PACIFIC HHWY TIGARD OR 97223 2S110DC -00400 e•.•.••.e•♦e•.a• DURHAM / 99 ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY CARL MARKS REALTY SERV • 77 WATER STREET NEW YORK CITY NY 10005 2S11ODC -00600 •.• .r •• COAST FINANCE 1' 11205 SW JRFIELD DR TIG'' OR 97224 2S11ODC- 00341;•• ♦• •0•,1•••.•••s• SI3URGARD INCOME PROPERTIES TEN 1201 THIRD AVE SUITE 2200 SEATTLE WA 98101 2S11ODC -00500 .t. • LUTON, ROBERT C SY TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO PO BOX 8041 BLACK BUTTE RCH OR 97759 • • • • 2S11ODC -00700 • • • ♦ r o . r • r. •• e • . e • e r •, • COAST FINANCE INC 11205 SW SUMMERFIELD DR TIGARD OR 97224 2S11ODC- -00800 ••,. .♦ Y•..•Y ..• FARWEST ASSOC SUMMERFIELD TAN'GLEWOOD ASSOCIATES PCM ASSOCIATES 400 SW SIXTH AVE, #1106 PORTLAND OR 97204 2S115A0- 03101. • . .. WESTWOOD HOLDING CORP 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND OR 97201 onosoo IUhd n rr, M.ASHE GTON COUNTY OREGON ZS MAP 10 i l 25 [ 100 CA .LE r= 200. T _ DURHPJ ROAD 1 v i so sa. 1700 �syv,�, 01. '� sf 15 14 L Fsrec x TO rJWgLJ. LJUt. Lon .2:10az.2totxrosaoc, so0.sa mane roc -coo. 601.oa1.ev1.ND.200,, . - 201.202.100.:OO.aO 1. 406.6410.1601.1102..... 110O,*4O1 1100.1900. 1400.0..16C00601. OQ.16C0060r. %CO. 2600.21.72. MOO. 7000.6001,700£. .00 _ {95.04' xammuNs 1801 1900. SAPS do SEE MAP 2S is I5AA 2100 1G5:. Na:I3091. 497.0 rs tC SNo*ear1', FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY OO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY. OTHER USE ate. fi500 tt 2400 nasnr t.zx 1 1 77417 2311. SEE 4tAP 2S I :5 AD Iso 447t 96 , eouTH 145' 748.0 RECOR T . FOR CAS TO: DATE: Ju1v 6_,, 1990 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PDR 90-0007 SITE DEVELOPMENT VIEW SDR 90 -0018 VARIANCE VAR 90- 0024,E AST FINANCE INC. (NPO #6) Planned Development detailed review /Site Development Review approval to t complex in an R-25 (PD) zone. Also requested is Variance a ro allow construction of a 2(�, unit retirement � to allow reducing the, number - of pp val covered parking spaces froze the re ired 20 to a total of 8 covered spaces° ZONE° ° R-25 PD Residential � ) � , 25 units/acre, Planned Development) LOCATION: West of 11205 ISW Summerfield Drive (WCTM 2S1 10DC, tax lot 600) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement' for your review. From information,, supplied by variouEv departments and agencies and from other information ,available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision If you wish to comment on this application, Sae nedour comments' future. will be rendered on the proposal in ommente' Y by1•u�o; 199°. You may use the space provided below or attach a; separate letter to return your comments. If ou are unable to res`on__d by the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments, in writing as soon ` as possible. If you have any "questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, FO Box 233970 13125 SW Hall Slvd, , Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 - 4171. STAFF CONTACT: F_ Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the race objections proposal and have no ob,ec.tions to it. Please contact of our office, Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments Name of Person Commenting' Phone Number: . bkm/SDR9O==18. `BK1K !• i G s CITY PO NO. ,:FICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICA'T° AS ( copiee DE' TMENTS Buiing `Inspector /Brad R. y Recorder Engineering/Gary A. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Fire District, (pick-up' box bldg..) Tigard Water District 8777,SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Metzger Water District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis Kevin Martin Joann Rice Scott King Fred Eberle Mike Borreson Jixn nendryx City of Beaverton PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 State Highway Division Lee Gunderson PO Box 565 Beaverton,, OR 97075 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES'' 1,•, : General Telephone Mike Lutz' 12460,, SW Main 'St. Beaverton, OR 97007 r``'• NW Natural Gas Don Thomas 220 NW Second Ave.', Portland; on 97209 CPO NO., Parks & Recreation Board Police /Other GOV School Dist. No. 48 (Beavr) Joy ' Pahl PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97r' School District '4,1';;..1 (Tice) 13137 SW PacJ'.''J Hwy, Tigard, OR .7223 Boundary Commission 320 SW Stark Room 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 METRO 2000 SW let Ave., Portland, OR 97201-5398 DLCD (CPA's oa ,,1y ) 1175 Court St. NE Salein, OR 97310 -0590 Other Portland General Electric' Brian Moore 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry • Beaverton, OR 97007 • • • • TC1 Cablevision of O.regbn, 3500 5W Bond Portland, OR 97201 Metro Area Communications Harlan Cook Twin Oaks Technology Centel' 1815 NW 169th Place 3 -6020 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4886 JS Weet ~. T ete Nelson 421 SW Oak Sty Portland, OR 97204 /no., Mike Hallock STATE AGENCIES _ Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) Engineer ,_ Board of Health Fish & Wildlife Paarks & Recrea. Div. Subdivision Supervisor Dept. of Energy Dept. of Environ. Quality • FEDERAL AGENCIES Corps. of Engineers Poet Office • OTHER DOGAMI Division of State Lands Commerce Dept.-N.H. Park LCDC PUC _ Fire Marshall` Other Other Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M. Forney, PLS -- Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, Rm. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 Y'L�NH 1 � j G1i1 i f )',... E1Im•A,WI 1PTN1r.11 4YJI A �' ~1'iime M.i t'l m1 • ili"IMII�Nf 1, 1 "N11I m (4 'iii �� a „ it '�y�' 1 ',7 ;1 Zi1m T i `,:)'t ,C— :.i 1 ;1' -40. .14.. r. i' w, wxq it 1 M p .' ::i !:) C: ,,. �.i HOOD C;f ,My M+ T `µ " ".A 3''� y/�'gp�4j{ ' *r�T jt `1'1},' .1: �, i� !-., 11,. pp ((ll�� y.lw�}"",. 1 iMrw+ {{(( EEj[[j''""�� ')j� jcjc gy qq!! {] A[ ��M�tM�A1 /iiY' 4 ^k�� rN SA fI fl r1r .LI : ::,':' #14 TinA Rrlf }"M� i1W �1jilt 04 , 911' IIr Lrr �llii I1r�A1 il• 4 �MY -, y. 1w�,.' 1Z...V•k"'1�'� *»4i� 3e +1'�1 dy.. Mt rarH,i«w y.. a4 vi IAm '1 ... 1 ', T . S .,: S • ?y"(uHti „Uti - 11. yf alf:.M0014 if+M!A.W0 YMfY1W11r00 • TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION`` REGULAR MEETING - SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 STUDY SESSION - 7:00 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. Senior Planner Liden reviewed items to be heard.. He explained the features of each plan option fog, the Triad development (item 5.2 on the agenda) President Donald Moen called the meeting order g � to rat7:35'PM The meeting was held at the Tigard Civic Center TOWN HALL 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. • ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Barber, Boone, Castile, Fessler, Fyer, Peterson and Saporta. Absent: Commissioner Leverett. Staff: Keith Liden, Senior Planner; Phil Grillo, City Attorney; Ellen Fox, Secretary. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Barber moved r approve the moved and Commissioner Boone seconded to a rove minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. Commissioners Castile end Peterson abstained. b PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION There was none. . PUBLIC HEARING 1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REVIEW :PDR 90-0007 , SITE DEYELOPME VI,E'W Si1R', 90 -0010 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0024, COAST FINANCE', INC. (NPO #6 ) A Planned Development detailed review /Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 20 -unit retirement complex in an R -25 (PD)` zone. Also requested is variance approval to allow reducing the number ed parking spaces from the required 20 to a total of 8 covered Parking of covered spaces. ZONE: R-25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units /acre, Planned Development) LOCATION: West of 11205 SW Summerfield Drive (WCTM 2S1 1 CDC, tax lot 600) Senior Planner Keith Liden described the location and site of the proposed Planned Development of Willowbrook Arms Retirement Apartments. number of ai ned- that the variance ere Test is to allow a reduction in the P parking spaces from the required 20 spaces to a total of 8 covered spaces; and he explained the reasons for t his v a ri ance r e q ue p e� staff is recommending app val of both the Planne d welop ment and Variance sub � ect to condi tions an d modifications noted ed in the staff reports PLANNING COMMISSION' MINUTES -= SEPTEMBER 4, 1 390 PAGE 1 APPLICANT'S PRESEN1 ON © Mark Grenz stated he is with Multi -Tech Engineering Services, 1155 13th Street, Salem, and represents the applicant. He described the Project, noting that it will be next to an existing retirement apartment complex. He pointed out the variance request does not ask for fewer parking spaces, but only fewer covered parking spaces. He explained one reason was to avoid obstructing-1-5i view for residents living in the adjoining retirement units. In addition, he said a portion of the retired residents do not own automobiles; and therefore, there is not the need for as many covered parking spaces as there would be in a typical apartment complex. p P lexr He answered questions from Commissioners pertaining to the facilities and services proposed. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED o The Commissioners commented favorably, with Commissioner Boone suggesting that the facility needs better signage. � •th�PDRi 90e0007tersan and VAR 90 0024 Fessler seconded to approve -' , SDR 90-0018, - based on staff's carried unanimously recommendation. on. Mots on c ously by Co mmissioners present. 5.2 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90 -0004 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 90-0002 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0007 TRIAD (NPO #6) A request for Site Development Review and detailed Planned Development approval of a 364 unit apartment complex on a 27.2 acre ro ert . Also, Variance approval is requested p P t grade ZONE: R 12 CPD) EResidental 12 units/acre rade of'up to 15%. -� to allow a Public c stye /acre Planned Development) and R-25 PD i (Resdent al , 25 units/acre Planned Deve1 oment). ' APPLICA BLE CRITERIA: Comprehensive p Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.4.2, 6.1.1, 6.6.1; 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.5.1, 7.5.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, and 8.1.3 and Community Development Code 18.92, 18 96 18.100, Sections 18.4; 18.56, 18.80, 18 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.150, and 18.164. Press dent e read statement those attending the g naming the sp ecific Comprehensive Plan Pol ices and Community Development Co de Sections by number (see 5.2 above "APPLICABLE CRITERIA "). fle •reyi • past actions on this ;prop discussed the pri or Planning Commission and City Council decisions He said the :City Council remanded s thi appl" � cats on back to "the 'Planning Conm•d ss on Primarily' because of transpottatiow4e,ssu0s, including access to and from the p^oPerty• He advised that the City does ,not f presently have a legal process for closing a stre It. et i s not presently open the ct: Ci y i s not obl i atedh` I .. g tor�penntho'street� when development accuts. He said an l ordi nance would fi rst have to be i mpl emented before a decision '. could be made to close a street._ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 1590 I I PAGE 2 Timmer September 27, 1990 Coast Finance, Inca P.O. Box 4020 Long Beach, California 90804..0020 ield/civic ASSOCIATION 10650 S.W. Summerfleld Drive Tigard, Oregon 97223 620-0131 Gentlemen: The City of Tigard Planning Commission has sent us the final order No. 90 -21 PC regarding the WILLOWBROOK ARMS RETIREMENT APARTMENTS. We had not had any previous communication between either the City or your company. There are some points we would like to bring to your attention: 1. According to our information, the area is not now within the boundaries of Summerfield Civic Association. 2. Do you desire to be annexed. by Summerfield Civic Association and pay dues so that your new residents will have use of our facilities? If not, you cannot advertise that the Summerfield recreation facilities will be available to the new tenants. 3. Do you plan to be a "Pair Housing" community W in other words, will one person of a couple be 55 years of age or over? Please clarify y our �ntentzons, we welcome your new addition and hop e we can work together to everyone's best, interests. Thank you. I {G FB cc: Jerry Offer, City of Tigard Bob Monroe, Summerfield Estates Sincerely, Howard Grahatn, President Summerfield Civic Association AGENDA ITEM 5.1 STAFF REPORT TO THE ' PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 - 7:00 Pm TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 FACTS . General Information CASE: WILLOWBROOK ARMS RETIREMENT APARTMENTS Site Development Review' SDR 90 -0018 Planned Development Revie PDR 90 -0007 Variance VAR 90-0024 REQUEST: 1., Planned Development detailed review /Site Development Review of a plan for development of a 20 unit, single building g retirement apartment complex on a 1.5 acre site. 2 e A variance to Community Development Code Section 18.106.030 to allow a reduction in the number of coveted parking spades from the required 20 to a total of 8 covered sPiaces• COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium -High Density Residential ZONING Dr.SIGNATION: R- 25(PD) (Residential, az5 units /acre, planned development overlay). APPLICANT /OWNER:; Coast Finance, ,Inc. 11205 SW Summerfield Drive Tigard, OR 97224 ARCHITECT: Pete Melin Melin and Associates 265 Commercial Street, SE Salem, OR 97301 LOCATION: West of 11205 SW Summerfield. Drive (WCTM 281 10DC, Tax Lot 600). 2. Eaokgrbund Information The subject parcel had been designated by the Comprehensive Plan Map for high density residential use since '1982. Hbwever, an error was apparently made in the maps prepared for the 1983/1984 Plan and zoning map revisions that I resulted in the parcel being split -zoned with the eastern two- thirds' of the parcel designated R -25 (PD) and the western STAFF RE P R T' S DR 9 U - 0018fPD R 90 -00 07 /VAR 90. - 00, 2 4 �Wil lI : o_ wbrook Page 1 one -third designated C-G(PD) (General Commercial, Planned Development overlay). On June 10, 19901, the Tigard Planning commission reviewed a request, by the Planning Division to correct this mapping error. The Planning commission; approved rezoning of the western one -third of the parcel to R-25 (PD) . 3. Vicinity Information The area to the west and southwest of the subject'parcel is zoned C-G (PD) and is developed as the Willowbrook Business Park. A portion of the parking area for the business park 'is intended to serve as the access to the proposed apartment complex. Access to this parking area from SW Summerfield Drive is through a driveway that is shared with the Summerfield Clubhouse Estates Retirement Apartments. The Shurgard self - storage facility is located immediately north of the subject property. This parcel is also zoned C- -G(PD) The Summerfield use' Estates a artments to the east are zoned ( ). Clubho p R -25 PD 4. Site ' Information and ]Proposal 'DescriPti.on The site is undeveloped and is covered *ith low grasses and weeds. There is a slight slope towards the southeast- ,The applicant requests Planned Development. Review /Site Development develop a �� ,i din would Review approval of a request to dev p Single building, 20 unit retirement apartment complex on the saie. on�theenorthern p �tion located° The be an, L-shaped 2- -s•tor building to be� g p provided, a . of the site. A parki g n lot with ' a2 arkan a aces would ba on the southern portion of the property, as illustrated on the site plan. addx.taon, six existing parking spaces in the ss Parkg lotgto, the south will be shared with the Willowbr rtheastern corner of the two perking paces would � es� would be Provided s in the no gravel site. These parking spac P ed access by the ravel the east on the Summerfield Clubhouse Eetatesaparcel. This •drive.. from th nth drive would also provide access t, build` g' P ement g ..access to the apartment, for golf cart stars e' The proposed blinding and parking areas ll besurrounded with landscaping as allustrated on the landscape plan. Sidewalks will be provided along the eastern border of the stte, as well as from the parking area to the building. Signs would be located on walls, on Constructed side of the entrance drive to the site. The walls would be of stone with the name of the retirement complex listed in . g brass letters: The signs will not be readily visible from the public right -of --way Acrenpy and NPC� Comment e The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has ,provided the following comments: sTAFF REPORT SDR 90 0018 /PDP. 90 -- 0007 - Willowbrook Page 2 /vi � 9 0 0024 - .. • Access to, S.W. Suimmerfield Drive for the proposed development would bethrough an existing fully improved private driveway on an adjacent parcel. • Sanitary sewer and storm drainage service would be provided by existing lines in S.W. Summerfield Drive. Services to the development would be provided by extending private lines from the site through the private drive. The Unified Sewerage District has established, and the City has, agreed to enforce, (Resolution 90 -43) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -Site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their construction. Requiring surface water quality facilities on small Sites would result in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the city. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities and there are no natural depression or other areas of this site that are particularly suitable for water quality facilities. Regional facilities, funded by fees in lieu of construction of ,these .facilities would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and less- maintenance. Consequent:iy, a fee in lieu of the construction of on site water quality fadlilities should be assessed. The Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District has commented that the »radius for the proposed turnaround in front of the building must be increased to a 25 foot inside radius and 45 foot outside radius in order to provide an adequate turnaround area for emergency vehicles. In addition, an adequately sized turnaround for emergency vehicle' use must be provided at the terminus of the gravel access road in the northeastern corner of the site Alternatively, the site plan could be revised to provide or this existing roadway to be extended to connect, with the proposed parking lot. This roadway* is necessary for emergency vehicle access to portiond of both the proposed complex and the existing Summerf ield Clubhouse Estates complex. The Uniform Fire Code requires that fire apparatus access be provided within 150 feet of all exterior portions of a building and that the accessway either be a through road or be provided with an appropriate turnaround for emergency vehicles. '' The subject roadway was required as a condition of h a pproyal " of the building permits for the Surnmerfield Clubhouse Estates apartments. The metropolitan Area' Communications Commission (cable television) has reviewed the proposal and has requested that the prospective developer install two 2 -inch schedule 40 PVC Conduit at all street Crossings in order to accommodate cable television installation; The Eiuilding Diviision, NPO #6, Tigard Water District and PGE have reviewed the proposal and have offered no Comments! or objections. mo other cbmnients hafts been receiv ed STAFF REPORT - S DR 90- 0018 /PDR 50- 0007 /VA.. R 90-0024 - Willowbrook ' Page 3 It ANALYSIS R-2'5 Zoning Iistrct> y site is a permitted use in the R--25 Multi- tamil, residential use of this s zoning district. Twenty dwelling units are proposed on an area that provides an opportunity for approximately 35 units. Proposed site improvements comply, with the R -25 district requirements for building height (45 foot maximum allowed; 25 foot maximum height proposed), lot coverage (maximum allowed site coverage of 80 percent; proposed site coverage of percent), landscaped area (minimum landscape coverage of less than 70 ercent , and .landsca ed a 20 percent; proposed landscape coverage of greater than 30 percent). The proposed building location satisfies minimum building setback requirements. Site Development Review The proposal complies with Community Development Code Chapter 18.120 (Site Development Review) standards for provision of private outdoor areas (balconies and patios), shared recreation facilities ''(common recreation included in the Summerfield community), as the various recreational '� facilities included building as well g rooms within the mmunity), screenin of servide facilities, and design offsets along building faces. Other Site Development Review standards related to other Code standards are reviewed below. Landscaping The proposed landscaping plan provides adequate screening and buffering between the proposed development and the adjacent commercial uses to the requires rt, eat buffer area of Community Development Code Section 18.100.130 10 feet along this property's boundary with commercially designated properties. A screen consisting of a fence or a continuous vegetative hedge is also required. The proposed landscaping plan provides for a hedge of arborvitae to be combined with a number of maple trees and other vegetation to g o provide the screen and landscape buffer. The Code also requires that no active areas such as parking Or vehicle :accessways be included within the buffer area. The landscaping for an adequate ,plan provides is con nt with this requirement. In addition, the lan rovides quate number of trees and lower level vegetation . within the parking area and surrounding the building so as to provide' for a pleasant residential feel to' the property; Parkin The site plan provides for as appropriate number of parking s aces for a 20 unit apartment develo ment. 30 s aces re p p p p p ( p c,{ured at �:. 5 s ace e r ui7it; 3l spaces provided): However, the two spaces in the northeastern corner of the site are not easily accessed because of the location og the ,spades ravel .surfaced.... P , nd because - tLn parcel. it re .t a se tine drivewa � on the abut g ` is recommended that these spaces be replaced with an rgea�.ve o the st . p y e g , ved lot to be shared tuith the business p a ore on g ark'or else in ' is i tired ar .xistyn a gt p p din' � area closer to the , build3.ixgs: a:n . s� ace addition, the applicant will need to provide documentation that a shared STAFF REPORT' - SDR 90-0018 /PDR 90-- 0007 /v''AR 90-0024 - Willowbrook Page 4 p arkin g agreement with the business park exists for any spaces that are shown to be provided in the existing parking lot prior to building permit issuance. The agreement must make it clear that the proposed apartments are to have access to these spaces at all times. The site plan proposes one designated handicapped parking space to be provided adjacent to the main entrance to the apartment building. Community Development Code Section 18.106.020.N.1 requires that parking areas be provided with one designated handicapped parking space for every 50 standard parking spaces. The site plan is consistent with this standard. However, the Oregon Revised Statutes have been amended to require additional designated handicapped parking spaces and a larger parking space effective September ,le 1990. The amended statute requires that two disabled person parking spaces be provided for a parking lot providing between 26 and 50 total parking spaces. In addition, the statute requires that each disabled person parking space be provided with a 6 -foot wide aisle on the passenger side of the space. The site plan will need to be revised to provide an additional disabled person parking space consistent with the axnended. state law» The site p lan proposes that eight carports be provided along the west side of the 'p ark inJ lot. Communi ty Development Code ° Section 16-106-030.A.4 requires requires one covered parking space for each dwelling unit. The applicants request a variance to the standard. The applicant's narrative includes a response to the variance criteria and an explanation of their request. provides following criteria for allowance of a Code Section 18.184.,x60 rovLdes tfie follow variance to a Code standard: (1) (3) The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the . purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any ! other applicable policies of the Community Development Code, to any other applicable policies and standards* and to other properties in the same zoning district or Vicinity. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size Or shape, topography or other Circumstances over which the applicant, has no control* and which are not applicable to other - t a lic able properties in the same zoning district; The rise proposed po ed will be the same as permitted 'under this Code and City standards will he maintained to the greatest extent possible, while permitting some economic use of the land; (4) Existing physical and natural systems such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks' will not be adversely affected anymo re than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code; and (5) The hardship is not self- imposed 'and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. TAVP REPORE2 Spit 90 0016/PDH 90 0007/VAR 90=- 0024 - wi1lowbrook Page 5 The applicant asserts that retirement apartment residents typically do not have as many vehicles as typical apartment dwellers and therefore there is less need for covered parking spaces than the situation the Code is intended to serve. The applicant's assertion is based upon the applicant's experience with managing similar retirement apartment developments. Staff concurs with the applicant's assertion based, upon our experience with various developments in Tigard. The eight spaces proposed should satisfy the demand for covered spaces at most times of the year. If the number of covered spaces meets the actual demand for covered Spaces for a particular apartment complex, the Codes purposes are satisfied. In addition, a.s the applicant points out, there are aesthetic reasons for limiting the number and location of covered spaces in order to preserve more appealing views for neighbors of the proposed development. Although uncovered cars in a parking lot is not usually considered an appealing scene, the cars often would not be in the lot, leaving an open view of surrounding landscaping and buildings, whereas carport or garage structures would always y s be there impacting the view. Because of the shape of the parcel, the only alternative to placing additional carports or garages along the east side of the site adjacent to the Bummerfield Clubhouse Estates apartments would be to ',place the parking underneath the proposed building. Parking underneath the building would be p it would cause substantial additional expense with impractical, because minimal if an y benefit, and basement parking also might require that the building's height be increased with resulting negative impacts on neighbors' views. The requested variance would not change uses allowed on this site. Because qu parking spaces provided - only would. not alter the total number of the requested variance y the number of covered spaces -- no impact on public streets .or adjacent properties'parking lots would result from unsatisfied demand. Additio y, other known impacts upon physical or. natural systems. Based upon no 'applicant's' experience with similar complexes, the applicant believes that the eight covered spaces will meet the needs of the complex's residents adequately, and therefore, the variance requested is the minimum necessary to maintain an open uncrowded living environment for the recommends while satisfying the residents demand for covered spaces. Staff s approval of this request to reduce the number of covered parking spaces from 20 to 8 spaces. Access and Circulation> The proposal satisfies Community Development Code Chapter 18.108 standards for internal roadway widths' (minimum width of 24 feet), number of access points { required; "1 provided), and, pedestrian circulation:' The proposed turnaround circle in front of the building Will provide an adequate turnaround for vehicular traffic to the site including'' emergency vehicles 'enlarged . y in Valley Fire and d b the Tua7.at. Rescue. Distraet. 'in size as recommendel Because the gravel drivewa y on the Summerfiell d C lubhouse Estates parcel is necessary to provide emergen.y 'sting and proposed a access to both the existing S' . - . . b- 0007 /VAR 90 -0024 -- lillowtrook Page 6 uTAFF � REPOR'$' SDR 90-�OOIg PIER 9 developments, this driveway should be terminated in an appropriately sized tt.'rnarourid to accomodate emergency vehicles. S'i ns The site and landscaping plans show stone walls` to be constructed on either side of the entrance to the proposed apartment complex. The name of the apartment complex will be placed on the wall in brass. letters. ' Because the signs are not anticipated to be visible from a public street, no sign': permit is required. . FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The applicable criteria in this case are Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.80, 18.92, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, and 18.164 as well as Comprehensive Plan Policies `2.1 1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, and 8.1.1. The Planning '`Division has determined that the proposal, with minor modifications that should be required to be made prior to building permit issuance,, is consistent with applicable portions of the Community Development Code based upon the following findings: 1. Chapter 18.56 (R-25 Zoning District) is satisfied because the proposal conforms with Ise, density, and applicable dimensional requirements of the R -25 zone. P ) satisfied because the proposal is to be reviewed by the Planning Chapter 18. 80 (Planned Develo meat is ommisson as required by the of the Planned Development overlay zone.' y he 3o Chapter 18.92 (Density COmputations4 ed because the Site p lan provides an a �p� � te caletilation of the number of housing unite for this Site Proposed P p . de fewer than the allowed numbernoftdwellnunitsvelo ment would provide dwelling Chapter 18. '�• p .100 (Landscaping and Screening) is satisfied because plans for landSCaPing, satisfy Co de requirements ment s for minimum site area landscaping, Perimeter' buf fering and sc reenn g, and parking dot landscaping. 5. Chapter 18.106 Off- street Parking) ` { is satisfied because the rite P lan satisfies Code requirements for number of total parking spaces dhd parking area lighting. The site plan will ,.need to be revised to provide for one additional designated handicapped person parking space and to adjust the Parking ing space area _: to be consistent with Oregon � park Statutes: Although the plan does not provide for an appropriate number of c required y recc�irtitriends a royal. of, the variance the. Code, staff PP as re fi ed }� nu overed parking M _ ,. gs Provided based upon the findin on pages, 5 and 6 of this report. The requested variance satisfies the � y ria for a i.sted in Chapter 18.134 (Variances). pp oval' criteria var�.ande 1 a r `tE e 7 Page SPORT SDR 90- 0018 /PDR 90w0007 /VAR 90L0024 W'illbwbrook 6. Chapter 18.108 (Access, Egress and Circulation) is satisfied because the site plan provides for . safe and efficient access and egress for the proposed Use and for general circulation on the site. The plan provides for an adequate number of driveways and, provides for safe pedestrian sidewalks through the site. The plan will need to be revised to provide additional area in the proposed turnaround for emergency vehicle access. 7 Chapter 18.120 (Site Development Review) is satisfied because the site plan generally provides for the proposed buildings and other site improvements so as to provide for privacy and light for the proposed dwelling units and to assure compatibility between the proposed development and adjacent uses. Adequate recreational facilities are provided for the proposed development's residents through membership in the Summerfield community. 8 . Chapter 18.164 (Street and Utility Standards) will be satisfied upon .approval public improvement plans for and construction of proposed sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvements to serve the site. 9. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because Neighborhood Planning g d. surrounding property owners were provided with Cr ani�aton �1'PO #6 an notice of the public hearing on the request including notice a'f Z.neir opportunity to comment pp y enton the proposal. Plan Policy 4.2 ,1 requires that all development comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. The prospective developer will be required to submit an erosion control plan guaranteeing compliance With the erosion control standards for the Tualatin River basin as part of the grading permit submittal, and will be required to file accepted methods of erosion control throughout the development of the apartment complex. 11. Plan Polio 7.1.2, 7.3 .1 and 7.4.4 can be satisfied because assurance of extension of sewer, water, and storm drainage facLlities to serve the development will be required prior to issuance of the building p pp these facilities will be permit. The a la,cant has indicated that the�� faci provided in conformance with City standards. The Engineering Department and other reviewing agencies have indicated that preliminry plans for, providing these t'tilities are ` adequate. 12. Plan Policy 8.1.1 is satisfied because the proposed development has direct access to SW Summerfield Drive, a fully developed major collector street. SW Summerfield Drive has adequate reserve capacity to handle the anticipated additional traffic load generated by the tional t proposed development. RECOMMENDATION ST., S' REP ORT - SDR 00-00 18 /PDR; 90-0007/V 4R 0 -0024 + illewbrook Page 8 4 The Division recommends APPROVAL of ',Planned Development PDR 90- 90-0018, Variance VAR 90 -0024, subject to 0007, Site Development Review SDR. � -0018 , Var the following conditions and modifications: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ` ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED AND COMPLETION OF PUBLIC ` IMPROVEMENTS FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE: OF A BUILDING PERMIT. The site plan shall be revised as :follows a. to provide a minimum of two appropriately sized and located designated handicapped person parking spaces; . to locate all required parking spaces in front of the proposed .building; c. to provide an adequately sized turnaround for the emergency vehicle access road in the northeastern corner of the site; • to increase the inside turning radius of the proposed circular turnaround ` n front of the building to no less than , �. 25 feet and the outside radius to 45 feet. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division, (639 - 4171). The applicant shall provide evidence of a shared parking agreement with the operators of the Willowbrook Business Park guaranteeing that a minimum of two parking spaces will be available at al] times for the use of the aartments' residents and ests within the already developed parking 'lot on the south end of t lot 600. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division. (639- 4171) • Building permits will not be until the Engineering > -Departrr..ent has ` opening permit. A 100 percent performance assurance ors letter Sof ecommitment and the payment of a permit fee are required. ST Engineering p ( 4171)., STAFF CO�JTIACT: John Bagman, En, ineerin De artment 63�- • A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on y ms for the common - driveways. The agreement shall Ct standard forms be referenced on and hecome part o f all a pp licable par cel deeds. The agreement approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT,:' John HagMan,1 Engineering Department (6.39_ 4171) The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system or by an on -site system designed to prevent runoff onto the adjacent property. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division (639-4171). • The applicant Shall provide connection of proposed buildings to the pu b lrc sanitary sewerage_ system. A connection permit required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division (639 - 4171): S.. - LiR 90�- 0018/'PDR 50"- 0007 /VAR 90 .-0024 - Willowbrook Page 9 T.ki"F REPORT S� J. Plans of the proposed privately operated and maintained parking lot and driveway detail shall be provided as part of the building permit submittal. The plans shall show the measured area of impermeable surfaces for the assessment of the required fee in lieu of the construction of on -site water quality facilities. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division (639 - 4171). 8. An erosion control an l shall be provided as part of the building p permit submittal. The plan shall conform to ` "Erosion Control Plans -- Technical Guidance 1989." STAFF CONTACT: Brad 'dance' Handbook, November Roast, Building Division (639-4171). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT: . All landscaping materials shall be installed as per the approved landscaping plan. All public improvements and other site improvements shall also be completed0 Financial assurance of an amount equal to the cost of materials and installation may be provided assuring completion all improvements within 6 months of occupancy. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division, (639- 4171). THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF 'EXERCISED WITHIN 'EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE NOTED , BELOW. PREP J BY IA//i Jer„ iffifer As ate Planner Al J I APPROVED BY: br /sdra018 Keith Liden Senier Planner. EtZL 4 .404 r 1� L DATE DATE Vu,'5+10 PAk I-- SuM Mere PIELD CLu a t4° '115E- gSTATE5 • STAFF REPORT -- SDR 90- 0518 /PDR 90r- 0007 /VAR 90 -0024 - Willowbrook Page, 10 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIG, OREGON TO: Jerry Offer, Associate Planner August 28, 1990 _- FROM: Greg Berry, Utilities Engineer RE: PDR 90-- 07 /SDR 90 -18 /VAR 90 -24 - Coast Fiance Inc. Descrittion: The applicant proposes to construct a 20 unit retirement complex west of S.W. Summerfield ,Drive. The variance is to allow reducing the number of covered parking spaces from the required 20 to a total of 8 covered spaces. Findings: . Access to S.W. Summerfield Drive is through an existing fully improved private driveway on an adjacent parcel • Sanitary sewer and storm drainage service are provided by existing lines in S.W.'Summeriield Drive. Services is provided by extending private lines from the site through the private drive. • The Unified Sewerage District has established and the City has agreed to (Resolution � � _. ' g` 1.�'tiea or fees in lieu ' ng enforce, Resolution 90 -43 Surface Water Mana ement Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality face i of their co ruction: Requiring Surface water quality facilities on small nst sites would result in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the City. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such no natural depression or other areas of this site fac�liti,eapand +there Particularly water quality facilities. Regional that afunded by fees able fe facilities, by � these facilities in lieu of 1 canstru�tion of . would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and less maintenance. gtL y lieu of the construction of on bite Conse entl , a fee in water quality facilities should 'be agseSsedp Recommendation: . Building permits will not be until the Engineering Department has issued a Street opening p ermit. A 100 Percent Performance assurance or letter of commitment and the payment of a Permit i fee . are 'required. STAFF' CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639.4171) . A joint ;lo�,nt use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on city standard forms for the common driveways. agreement i referenced on and become '.part of all appli The _ shs:ll be refer eeds. The cable Parcel d.. ENGINE�Rh�G COMMENTS NTS C CAST FINANCE (PDR 90�i7 %SDR 9Q -1S/VAR 90-24) PAGE RP agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engaieering Department (639- 4171), • The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system or by an on -site system designed to prevent runoff onto the adjacent property. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division (639 -471) . The applicant shall provide connection of proposed buildings to the public sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required 'to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division (639- 4171). plans of the proposed privately operated and maintained parking lot and driveway' detail shall be provided as part of the building permit submittal. The planS shall show the measured ° area of impermeable surfaces for the assessment of the required fee in lieu of the construction of on -site water quality facilities. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division (639- 4171). • An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the building permit submittal. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical. Guidance Handbook, November 1989." STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division (639 - 4171)• APPROVED: 7 Randall R. Wooley, City gineer dj /GB :sdr90 -i8 ENGINEERING db IENTS » COAST FINANCE (PDR 90 /17 /SDR 90 -18 /VAR 90 24) PAGE 2 REQUEST, FOR COMMENTS TO: i DATE: July 26. 1990 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE : PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PDR 90 -0007 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90 -0018 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0024 COAST FINANCE INC._ (NPO #6) Planned Development', detailed review /Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 20 unit retirement complex in ` an R-25 (PD) zone. Also requested is Variance approval to allow reducing the number of covered parking spaces from the required 20 to a total of 8 covered spaces. ZONE: R-25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units /acre, Planned Development) LOCATION: West of 11205 SW Summerfield Drive (WCTM 281 10DC, tax lot 600) Attached is the Site' Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to Comment application, ,we need your comments by Au . �6,• 3f snt on this 199q. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to r sslond by the above date,. please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this ` matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639- 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Ferry Offer PLEAS CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ' THAT APPLY p fit' .... i We have reviewed the ro po sal and have no objections to it Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: 621" r PhOne Nu er . bkt/SbROOL18,8kM ■ or" ' , • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS %JUL. 31 RCC' TO: DATE: Jul 26, 1990 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PDR 90 -0007 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90-0018 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0024 ..,AST FINANCE1 INC. (NPO #6) Planned Development detailed review /Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 20 unit retirement complex in an R -25 (PD) zone. Also requested is Variance approval to allow reducing the number of covered parking spaces from the required 20 to a total of 8 covered spaces. ZONE: R -25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units /acre, Planned Development) LOCATION: West of 1120 : 11205 SW Summerfield Drive (WCTM 281 p 1ODC, tax lot 600) Attached "is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From supplied by departments agencies and from other, information su ` various de artmentpe and , information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If You wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. P, 19go. you may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. I,,rfyou are unable.: to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your coMnenits in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter- , '', contact the Tigard ` Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ti We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enciosled letter. Written dornment i it Name Of Person Commenting: Phone Number: C� bkm /SDR9O --18 . BKM ttEUJVD PtNN iIG AUG 61990 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • � 1 u 0± - DATE: 2 E� 1990 FROM: Tigard Planning Departnient RE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Pbf 90 -0007 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW „SDR _ 90 -0018 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0024 COAST FINANCE INC. (NPO #6) Planned Development detailed review /Site Development Review approval to, allow construction of a 20 unit retirement complex in an A- -25 (I'D) zone. Also requested is Variance approval to allow reducing the number of covered parting spades from the required 20 to a total of ;,8 covered spaces. ZONE: R -25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre., Planned Development) LOCATION: , West of 11205 STW+T Sunnmerfi "eld Drive (WG"TM 2S1 10DC� ®taix� lot 600) y. Attached ie the Site Plan applicant's and a and pp ° s stateanent for your review. From information supplied by various 'departments and 'agencies and 'from other po recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on . the proposal le to our staff, a re rt and information ava��.].ab p poeal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, oneeadtaou comments by Auer.., 6, Y FP Your You may use the space provided a separate: letter to return your comments. ' I f v au are unable to respond b y the above e r�ate, please phone hoenta in staff writing noted below with your comnnents and e;onfirm 'your a goon as possible. If, you have any questions regarding matter, this Tigard g p Po Box 233S'7, 13125 SW Hall � a T3 ara,cCA22t �22� PHONE: n639 -4171 Department, STAFF CONTACT t ,__"_erru Offer CNECR THE ITEMS THAT ` APPLY: Pi,EA�� HE FOLLOWING We have P po+ objections to it' lid Ve reviewed the ro e�al and have no ob "e contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter, Written Comments: .. _ ............................. . Naive of Person ComMenting: Phone Nutber : 6 3 9 15 5 4 burn. /SDR90.18 . BKZ n P :t. er, minis ratot 0E001110 14110111102 AUG 1 1990 TO: .1'`"'/ d ♦I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: July 2 , 1990 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PDR 90- -0007 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90-0018 VARIANCE VAR 90-0024 COAST FINANCE INC. (NPO #6) Planned Development detailed review /Site Development Review approval to ' complex in an R -25 (PD) zone, allow construa.tion of a "20 unit. retirement Also requested approval to allow reducing the number of sated a.s Variance covered parking spaces from the required 20 to a total of 8 covered spaces. ZONE: R -25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units /acre, Planned Development) LOCATION: West of 11206 SW Summerfield Drive (WCTM 2S1 1ODC, tax lot 600) Attached Plan and applicant's statement for your review, From information supplied Pl by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish ' to comment on this application, we need ` your comments by AAug. 6s, 1990. You may 'use the space provided beloW or attach a separate letter to return your comments. I you are unable to res easy the above date , please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your this a is i writing as ,the as possible. If you have any questions regarding Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4/71. rtment, PO SW matter, Box 23397, 13125 S STAFF CONT ACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE 'FOLLOWING ' ITEMS THAT APPLY W have reviewed the proposal And have no objections to it Please contact of our office,, PleaBe' refer to the enclosed , letter. Written Comments • ame of Person Commencing: N. Phone NuMber bkm/SDR90 -18. BEE REceeito F'aio9NG JUL S 1199 TO: BEQUEST Pfi COMMENTS FROM Tigard Planning Department DATE:u1�r�2fi, 1990 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PDR 90 -0007 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90 -0018 VARIANCE VAR 90.0024 COAST FINANCE INC. (NPO #6) Planned Development detailed review /Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 20 unit retirement Complex in an R-25 (PD) zone..' Also requested is Variance approval to allow reducing the number of covered parking spaces from the required 20 to a total of 8 covered spaces. ZONE:' R-25 (PD), (Residential, 25 units /acre, Planned Development) LOCATION: West of 11206 SW Summerfield Drive (WCTM 281 1ODC, tax lot 600) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from, other - information available to our Staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared be rendered on the If ou wish to comment on this propiasal in the near future. - will y � is application, we need your comments b. At�l rp are and a decision F , 6 -, 1990. Vou may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vau are unable to _respond by the ,abslate.. please phone in writing ^- noted below with your comments and confirm your P staff contact If y any questions regarding, , g s soon � s passible. you have an o this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Ball Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerr Offer PLEASE C e.CK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments Name of Peron Commenting: Phone NUmber: bkm /SDR90 --18. BIM PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: PDR 90-0007 / SDR 90-0018 / VAR 90 -0024 FILE TITLE: COAST FINANCE, INC. APPLICANT: COAST FINANCE, /NC- 11205 SUMMERFIELD DRIVE TIGARD, OR 97224 OWNER: SAME REQUEST: Planned Development detailed review / Site Development Review approval to allow con complex PD zone. Applicant al retirement com lex in an R -25 construction of a 20 unit Appli so requests Variance approval, to allow reducing the number of covered parking spaces front the required 20 to a total of 8 covered spaces. LOCATION: West of 11205 SW Summerfield Drive (WCTM 281 10DC, tax lot 600) ZONING DESIGNATION: R -25 PD (Residential, 25 units per acre, Planned Development) g. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: t�edium - Hi h density residential NPO NO 6 CHAIRPERSON Sue Carver PHONE: 639 -8507 STAFF DECISION C P S /� /� • 30 ,,,,_, PLANNING COMMISSION DATE 9 04 90 TIME. 7. HEARINGS OFFICER DATE / / TIME • CITY COUNCIL DATE /_ / TIME ST FOR C e attached list) RETURN EY _/ / X ATT ATTACHMENTS: X VICINITY COMMENTS (see attached X LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN X SITES PLAN STAFF CONTACT PERSON: Jerry Offer PREPARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL: X ADVERTISEMENT - TIMES _ /_ /_ OREGONIAN X NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE MAILED LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION /� NOTICE TO DLCD -- ATTACHMENTS: • 1• • n TICOR TITL W1 I RA CONSUMER INFORMATION REPORT Pre tired for Melin Associates a €tn Pete M.e1in FA) 363-16°,4 Property Address 2S110DC -00600 & 00700 Assessed Owner Coast F±njnpe Inc t1 !Viso 0 Copy Deed 0 apy Contract 0 Other 7/11/9 Kirk i � n_ . d, without chase; in conformn nce with the gui eliines a pr« edvby he This title inferrn:�tiert t��s been f�urniei�e �� , rnve t, Y ner, The insurance Division benefiting int a oe � n'iit��� .. that Mete of Oregon Insurance Gam 9 ultimate insureds; indiscriminate use only g ermedi, i will be permitted, dear reed to benefit the 1�it arias w�ii net Said in this report herd �eNiaaa rreay b+i� d +s�ar�tine��� NCI 11ep�lo is eeaum�d fur any errors Tt OR - 4450 S.W: Lemb0rd •04..te 15), P.. 0, i3o (50..0:4.904e'. ti PrQpet ^ty ID Di$p lay F'rcDpertY Re t r Fi 1247' 5� LeS7mX ip i n: 1, .t i C Owner ID ' g 94106 COAST rINANCE INC 1 i 2 u5 SW�ySUMMLkF" I ELD DR T I GARD, OR 972?4 i tut Cord' Atteo - 2 Exemptlttns Mort Lender: 2 . 4 ►t,..ro7 25110DC 00 600 Meal l Pr oper^ty 1989 Tax St4ttus Current Levied Taxes 2,647.07 Ser 1al A5sotsmEtnts ***K' Unpaid Taxes * *4( Depress the RETURN key Prop Class 7012 Ne ghbQr'hoOd X�- 2 Year O i It Livin8 Area a Gale Date Sale Price e Deed TYPE Xr7mt Number" 01037174 1990 P "peaty Values lmpr,ovementS $ Land Total f $ %essea E:t emp t 1 O Taxable 1O /01/81 21011.7)00 2,110 121,990 0 121,99u Di sp ], I y Property Record �- t ID F�136w�12$ 2911 ;�'DC'UU7r�0 (Per Onai F'r ^pent ) Property �- L €s t 1 Description: 2e 11 DC: 007000 B/E R5C INC Se/S9 7 -le -$9 Owner ID : 15ib COAST FINANCE DE3A SUMMERF ILD CLU HOUSE ESTATE 1120;5 SW SUMMERF IELD DR • TIGARD, OR 97224 S i t us u 11.20$ SW S UMMERF I FL J DRIVE Cade Area M 023.74 e m p ,' i W n �.. 1 +. r~ W �� }/ a �.r� Mort hendar : Y Prop Class, Neighborhood: Year EU± l t Living Area ; Salo date c ale Price Deed TYPE' Irist Number 1919 Tax Status Qulrt�en t _eV i ed Taxes 31176,947 Special A$'se smafts *** Unpaid Taxes * ** Dep r es$ the RETURN key Total l Asses d $ 1:31 t200 ( ) E „emp t ions 0 -) Taxablo $ 131,900 (ma) fSsM or IAHLCA11 terfirwl 1 I li ii +vnn!. f ; r h`a62a ltwurcuuu ,,ul►,;uiY MEMORANDUM OF .ANC SAtt CONTRACT kNOw ALL NIeN b1} THFSE hk 5thITN, Oro oo Or:Ober TU 1. I)r�4'r:ltlpm nt Co., 1hci RadoVi(k l ntarnrine t, lns=, wide nrid Mit1'ft'dt trIt A 1'rffn(n tnik(•t./rh t'dfiftnet wherein h„ rd 1'rndfbr(h) Airntd'tn A,•tt to 'Mid i'erarle■(n) nod the tntlrf n��ffMMl ti: nilfLhi't'e 1114111 wi! txiklut(k) the lrr•nrmplr title If) 4l1ri (n the ltuthllott01 t keith•il trot prlrpterli Ili 'A ah'i 11i; ton L'cnlnfI shit,. iil Olroctn, fn.tvi ?f '30u nohedulr_ A AttAdh14(1, 81037174 /9 :1 ii.. I'riHlflr(i.) tttiil' nh t'rndt�r(.J Thr (fur rftel rrc'funl l'uni.ldrt.ufntli ltul the hntuJrr, w'1 (filth In hem, OWfit'F. tF $ ' 1 do Q :'Y? 41 . *Migxx00, �0 ►4x1WAu -r( .+ .r•x41 lac &xJC0e, +1>ix* tWNa .4?{ otk X1 Y E 4Kmml x 44sue )4f�l67: F1 d'11dAt ij' 71 AfPktilO �M1fU61} :t4t'>>`Kdt bi IIr>?t7fY.t; �.x]CXh �t �, l�it?CN..ltk1(hbd7t i'�11!i i re icim ?Ca K ormv x ItaNa+l+x 6anc�sx b4 K r•1 11KXK i;tlCN%;$1r!li kriai4 M4414xfrot1,61.4too ti4pA AriaxmukoNl�bBdt l // r1otCtbor 41' u"1► 11t N/!(tr>e Wirf•w f ?rr 1'nNi i'Onditflh) 1411± etrruted dot rr7tt'hiymoduto i 1 1.11) .,,. 1,, 4.),, .N .r.. ,.,r 1:4 ,.word 1.1 •h. ..,.F.., ..,.. .., 4, ft. 4. .1 I.. 41rrr r14... ,. ,.4, I.nr:.o. 1 41!_�.Y, -�1 1.,1 ,i• jr., ..� , • 4•,•41.4 •r 1.11. 141 i1 to Clete net. n( 1' 10 pritnn411i .t p1.1AM4 fh• nMMve r,nwl nail nl I mH a li',4. d th. 1•11rd•dnl 1n111t1 ■04.0,i I.. I'r 1 (r%Unlst i Sri 041 Il.4i0 . k.ilair Pidsier i,u (l,clnn hfr 1'INUIi.l,u1,•, intim$ 't•�itllln Molvolorimont Co., Inc, 15100 5. W. 11Gth .AVitnuc 1110nrtil nrorIran '472.'21 .0,0 ,4 ..-j OW alru.4.. ttgidtiC1: ilntckpei tiara, InC4 1820 5, WI Vo>?hont itroot rdrt14tic, C)raqun '17210 $141 it i 444'i 4,1 41410444: arATi' rsP t tit kt)(1lt', Cielnli rI tohc r:• 6 .14) Pr; bn.tl1- 0nf•r4 rd t,r:,ijCc` t (.6. Luton w..m.IC u Ali, 1. -rtlt dull aw „l r,, 1�},SQ'ikftrii.ItJX)401,344 . :i 001.14'1484.40 wei�fyh�ar',+ahr PIAl4/ Iv,iliti, (•rF�idrnl i D)44"t{rtitai�l`ri X441161 �.,��+:dc,ic Y r 'ducal 1' { n Dcii. L 11)ritH0ht Co . , I tic . A rtwpll$MIiI do./ iAO I. 4-eI i10l0114.4 It• lii- i i•un.ini r1 fM r +an,•r.1l n.1 .41 tAld nut fMnl•ii imi Ihn1 Bahl lnilfunanI N111 110044 NW ..1.,1 In I.44 roll f•• _4411 eu11411111 ••l i•• /Nihrd uI d,l,. tN$.; elid �rrii ICI lnrr Mt ,r.rl 'r.1 i� l(uii "rni I., IN/4ii, n11lwuf mi .4,J il•Pd u kr +lilj`, llahli4' ha YJ).lull ^` (Ni A1.41,14) 1Nl #i•riinU,llall rihflr. 1l •.%, , I, 14iy..or 00444 444.44 4lu nocipr4,c),' Irntnrltriaijii1 tnc. 1010 Si tte6ot I'ottiand, drogoh 77217 .,.w.,w4 441 4 4 I.wr 4 t+■lli' 1i,.s+ n ii4ro.014 440.44 0f 1360 tidR Vtittgp0ieQ04 tn�l 0126 t;. ',f Voi•rhorlt f;tl'uot ortition 07211 44V ar oeviii J,r n ' ill t�G O N f1Mucru.MnR? - , „u.rA-4 PI n - r II l r 11 t jp ' ' 1 � 2I 0 Ci * 11.14. 4} 1141,1.4 4 ..AI tooth r f n* ill Unlat{( fib the flt4tllini iih /tith't llfhly No Nru i ,d 111 b+4v1ti 141 ',rail wrath ► W$tifr 4i liAliel 41141 writ id (1K1nti' Illlii 4,4141 llt. 1inj9Ut 1.1 iii 1 .,I+ 4 EXHIBXT A ? portio4 of Lots 16 and 17 wILLOW1 00K FMU4. iii the city of Tigard, Washington county, Qreg+ n: Beginning at a point located on the North line of that tract nor eyed to Tualatin Development CO., Inc. in Deed Book 649, Page 19, Deed Records 'being the Northwest corner of that tract recorded as Fee No 75 *26615 on July 9, 1979, Deed Records; thence south 447.96 feet; thertca south 330 20' 27" West, 18.76 feet to the Northerly Lino or $ , w Summerfield D jUe as re0Orded in Dtwed Book 954, pages 340 through 344 aa dedicated to the city Qf Tigard; thence North 56° 39' 35" went, 52.00 feet; thence along the art of a 130,00 foot. KddUs curve having a centrat angle of 064 40' 55 ", the chord of Which bears North 60" 00' 030 West, 15.15 feet (the art distance of 15.61 feet being to the ,Fight 04 the chord) to 1e Southeast corner of that tract conveyed to sunday Consumer' Corporation in Fee No. 70- 26990; t}tenoe along the Easterly boundary of said Fee No. 79-26990, North 26° 30 320 West, radially 39.4:/ feet;; thence North 68° 46' 57" ' 2i� 131 031 Bast, 104.00 feet; thence Wort, °00 ' 57 Westoc North , thence North 00* 19' 1.6" West, North Gal° 46' 57" 4lest 94, feet; tlen 80.E thence So.tth 89° 40' 44" West, 95.00 feet; thence North 00° 19' 16" WeSt, 165.00 feet to the Northeast Corner 115 described in Fee No 79- 16980; thence. Uotth 89° 40' 44" Fart, 235.30 feet to the point of beginning. •. —_. were dr ruNt6oN Cnuniy 4l ► Wthi�tt�n 9$ I, Ito Oett Yhct,I ,yn. 8111,0nt tot AttOotdi, 0%4 tlntitorti and t.+QfltElot fa'ces+dc oI ttt,, VieVOOtiii tGf ilAN toUniV. ct0 he,ioy 4 itlty.'hift . chi tminItt Gt wtoiinq Wns raarrvyN end iac°tnn6 to km* ut titoOtthi i note Odttnit 45r/i1 4itoritti k efacunn! RCV BY;MELIN AND ASSOO ; 7-11 -90 ; 3:11PM ; 603 826 9318.4 PETE MELIN;# 6 JUL 11 ',90 1E03 A I COR 3VTN PACE . 06 ianon CIRCULATE. r. BR ice' R W 11 „C 49, ; Staff Review / x %, r�r � f�. f CITY OF TIGARD STAFF r� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT „ � -D PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST To Pt) dorozecr sliAP eiZia012, Date- . � /q5C) APPLICANT ETE / 2. PROPERTY LOCATION Address 5,L A41 /i 1"'/ ",4, -ax Map /Tax Lot re. 066 r PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION /NECESSARY AP�PLICATION(S) USE �. J1 I/Z LaP 1 107- EVIEki Existing W- (44.141 k:L Adjacent Property north south easy 4 f5 y 'kW IV SPolc West COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION ;. � tl (. ZONING DESIGNATION. i,� -(;),5 '( Pb 1�"a :'' R rA;r 1i ' n tt t �, � ... �M "2�, 4,R 1d' 4�;. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION NC ; ..,r CHAIRPERSON .��� 'PHONE y 'f � VV +krYA' CODE REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size /width tt Setbacks: front LL I corner Side rear Special setbacks: streets - °, established areas lower intensitj zones wet:lands flag lot accessory structures zero Lot line �...�.. ` coverage Y�ta,K zm+�m of co Maximum buiidxhg height o:1 I1 Pt .Special height limits flag lot other Density calculation , (1 e Density transition Landscaping: minimum % of lot area J/ Street Trees v r Buffer Areas i 1 t P y}�y jyp Paris iflg Areas visual clearance parking /' -and load in � �r , � Dexto Access and circulation' Signs OTHER CONSIDERATIONS (See application checklist for specific items) � �25� slope. _ • sitive lands: - floodpl: if draifaaeway 1, ._ (?pin spare Historic overlay Street improvements/ a eG ®to-Ait ee s Right -of -.say dedication Sanitary Sewer improvement u r Storm Sewer improvements' • 4) .: �„ - : Fees . '.�:�.'" • .�--- rouemen Agreeaer�t Pena Z�+p ite 6tcands rmits +�ieir agere+�y ' P'e 1: � n Pit ROCEOURE r Administrative staff i�eva.eaa • . _.. n,str°a�t�. Public he a r�r���eai��s officer' �..� . Public ! ealrit BPla�nnit Commis$1.0n -- bar il.. . s trattie -d wci sion or Pu bl i c I e arin s hal l o ccur apPkante3q dad s af ter a c�plee . appli atiun at f /led A 0--day app at period follows alt decisions (O5/1P/0622P) ,4! WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE I "= 100' T3I.4.0 E oUNTA1 Ns SEE MAP 2S I IODC SUPPLEMENTAL MAP NO.I ( PHASE -4) PHASE -3 ) RE 15165E2) , ZoA / 6 IZEPES /& IT 0 To 073- (i/pAnA a5-av vvV 1111t- &,j C1" it RE f' P s Zokiii06 f 'EpE51 A24 -tom R5- c REs1PEN i 1 025 a iT. ,4 C2) ,551` S` 49°52` 7 " "w lal it it 2 500 13803. 1/4 Gale. 1 1,40" te5.6' io �e tt= Ats- COMMON AREA 263.1s s 0£ °62'7 "w 433' 1740 CHs.. CR 429_4or WIDTH )! 139.3e $39.36' '^�rir Staff t3 Date CITY OF "f CGARJ CoMMUN1] Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639- -4171. ITEMS TO BE BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) B) owner s signature/written authorization C64°"' C) Title transfer instrument []-'. D) Assessor's map L� E) plot or site plan+` 1) Applicant's statement i'44 # , . roi d 4ie bri ti* (G) List of property owners & addres es within 250 Bet 3 (H) Filing fee ($ $e . ) l l L�� L SPEC1rIC MATERIALS A) Information s howxn a (lo, f copies :w..�4 [ � 1) Vicinity_ Maps�"'� 2) Site size & dimensions [ . n ) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or .� Pt for i atao 10% 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds, [� 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Fioodplain areas C'] b) Slopes in excess of 25% [ c) Unstable ground C� Y d) Areas with high seasonal' water table C ] e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential [ ] Areas having severely weak foundation sb113 r ] 6) Location of resourc : areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including, a) Wildlife habitats [ b ) Wetlands [ ] 7) Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings [ ] b) Trees with '1i s' �Y 6 + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level [ 8) Location of existing structures and their used 9) Location and 'typo' of on and 'off -site noise sources C` 3 10) Location of existing utilities and easements'" 11) Location of existing dedicated right -of --ways 8) Site bevolopment Plan 'showing (No, of copies ,�w) 1) ' The proposed _ site and surrounding properties 2) Contour line intervals 8 the location dimensions and names of all: a) L'kisti.ng & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties AI PLI:C tTION cI•U CKl...IS�'' PagQ IF b) P oposed streets or other public w s & easements on the site, c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension A) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site b) Parking and circulation areas c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle, circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and 'easements on the site 6) Storm drainage facilities zrrd°rrsF d€wa tr e cr nd": 't'i on s 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation 12) Existing or proposed' sewer reimbursement agreements C) Grading. Plan (io..: of copies The site'developno:nt ; plan' shall include a 'grading plan a'l the same scale as the site analysis drawings' and shall contain the following' information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it ;i is proposed to be done, 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating a) Subsurface exploration and gc otechnical engineering report b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals! c) That all problems will be mitigated ° and how they will be mitigated A chitectural_,b, a 5) � +^ wince (No, of copies ,�.J��) The site 'development plan proposal, shall include: 1) Floor plans .indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on -site, and 2) Typical elevation drawings of each xttructure .' E) Landscape Plan (111o, of copies ' ): The landscape plan shall Ise drawn' at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate, i) Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2) Location,iand, height of fences, buffers and screenings APPLICATION N KL S"', Par 2 C C e,' C C� a • •, 1 3) Ation of terraces, decks, shei ). pray areas gild common open spaces [ ] 4) Location, type, sire and species of existing and proposed plant materials, [ The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: C] 1) Soil conditions, 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. [ t Sign r)rawings sin drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. G) Traffic generation estimate [ H) Preliminary partition or lot line ad, ust►nent rn sh(2wa (No, of Copies ): 1) The owner of the subject parcel 2) The owner's authorized agent C 3) The map scale, (20, 50,100 or 200 feett 1) , inch north arrow and date [ ] 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries [ j 5) Location, width and names of streets, easemehts and other public ways within and adjacent to the par(�el [ ] 6) Location of all permanent huiidihgs on and within 25 feet of all property ,lines [ ] 7) Locati.o+A and width of all water courses [ ] $) Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level [ 9) All slopes greater than 25% ] 10) Location of existing 'utilities and utility easements ] 11) For major land partition which s a public street; a) The proposed right—of—way location and width b) A scaled cross—section of the proposed street p).us any reserve strip [ ] 12) Any, applicable deed restrictions [ �I 13) lEvidence. that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable [ ] X) Subdivision Preliminar+� Plat Map, .and data show;ing(No+ of Copies 1) wcale equaling 30, 50 100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet 1 3 2) The ' proposed name of the subdivision C ] 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets 4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the o.oner developer, engineer, surveyor, designer, as applicable( ] 5) Dabe of application C '] 6) Boundary ' lines of tract to be subdivided [ ] 7) !dames of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded Owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdlvided land t 3 3 Con tour lines related to a City—established bench- mark at 2—foot intervals for 0 -10 % grades greater than 10% [ APPLTCATIO1 CH C14LX 3T µ- Page 3 � ..xl" «vi.t�... �. .. • x ... -: .r . �::.. r�, -al � +. • F......�.,::a.. x.. n .:;: A,:,. ., al ..� :l.,x.r .x - '..v.. '; Gi 9) The pd pose, location, type and size of aI1 of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision) : [ ] a) Public and private right -of —ways and easements [ ], b) public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [ c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants [ d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) [ e) Watercourses C ] f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pathways and other land encumbrances C a 10) Approximate plan and proFiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated [ 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants, 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision. 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right —of -lway; 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow C 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water- - courses and drainage ways C ] 16) The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers, Where losts are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots 1 ) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any 18) The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures' are to remain after platting 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) b) Proof of property ownership c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements 20) Existing natural features including rock out• croppings, wetlands and marsh areas.0 21) if any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat,, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application C 3 C� C3 C3 C] C �. C3 C3 Other Information C] (2862P/ )028P) APPLICATION CH CI'LI T — page [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]