The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR7-84A POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. ,.. „»r ' 4.1 c f M.�I nn ! a ;1,it- M'i ki{MWi li�Ni'11M ., .,�...,i- L ,., ,.,4 ..,. ...« ..�,.,., n ..., nr »�....�.�,...,, ..�.tr- ..,naa.,�lt..e u+.<.a <.- n -� .rh ; ' •�• �t Nya ce, rf+k y Y li ;P r �� a '� /y■ J I • t NW rqc 3 r e , e Eerie,;&'?a ifl } . , „ '2SI ].Q . :"'. �`c'OPA' 14 "8�4'�••,:•','•'7,,,::'''''" " � 4-,84i )f.f tS 0,4) sµ ,��. .r �..._ j�. .. ., .,4 wFh,;..,uMnrti4.+tn..�.«.F.-a1 ,v.et...,:Fn....o;a.',.•+,...n..yyA,,ee.,ar...aRe4w.•.aa.uv,fi w,vl a.r.Sr1rx..•.+«,∎•1•4^..+5»+l.,LkrhMl.54r::�',i•rn' u'a „.. ..,, ar ...,....a.,.l:.. .....w...w:�,....,nt .....'l..w....r,t,,. f.Jiii�✓ f. . ;1 h '.it Tr . ti I JJ t t y t I P • z ti I ' . z�s a d Rw . a 1 , • • S)) T10141i6 A FILE CONTENTS SD •,,. 714k SEE ALSO LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Assessor's Ma p Mas/Preliminar Plat Maps/Preliminary y 1/Not� g Description/Deed -- -,- fication Legal v/ Surrounding Property' Notice Letter of Authorization Affidavit of Mailing "Copies of Correspondence with Applicant V A enc /NPO Notice Public Input Affidavit of Publication ./ (agency/NPO Comments Articles/Notices from TT Sta ecision(s)-Da.te(s) /Aplicatton/NarratIve Planning Commission Dte IP i 'ina.1 Action Notice P/Minutes Final Order-Date City Council-Date Minutes Resolution No. Date I . I I Ordinance No. Date I I M ` 1 Correspondence After Approval SUMMAR' re, oed De �.ed r v n App No, of Phases Special Setbacks 4Y . 1 u w RL/bj s(O6t6P) I , I I � fi I I o C �. r . I • /--.'. • . . :rt` 4rn__ r7 RN^ 4y, r�' 41 '' '"r /_ K, 1 K An.'1 t'�y x \t fv M1r',""' f f '41'''''' 'I'''''::'''''''' .� f �'�1 'F r ur- i r tY�,' 1, ` j{,'-A '.Nr a ) }_ `� •�. t � ,�i�V „. , 'I •ie,i< 1 i'')f*^',a lK) �,..i,:;' Y.,.,p' � r S'IFti'"'r • n 7 lCI.1'Y OF, TIGARD�_ OREGON , , .__». . , COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA O `-I -8‘, AGENDA ITEM #: . , , 9 .. , , DATE SUBMITTED: Tbc,..0 301J-1 11 )85- PREVIOUS ACTION: w.__»~ • 1•. • ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE': Resolution of ' , , ' itilt"f . Acceptan e - Pfaffle St. & 78th Ave, PREPARED BY: En ineerin Section ,_,._.,�,.»..,.. ., .�.._.-..._.w.• ....... .. REQUESTED BY:Y; c,ht r� f'�aq m n .,.._,.. w___ DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: • ARTM�»NT K. ��.�� _w w w �� r - w ww .«.�w~, �:« w ,w.�... w w w� �w�w. «•w_ w-��« y w �w ,_.,.�.� ww„ • .., .._ .. �.«,» �. .....mow., �,w w.�, �� , ,�«w....:::::w..�«, POLICY ISSUE , ,. 4 w ».,,.r_«w w. ,r »,w_' r w M��«:,_w ».»_ « ww «w w,w w...w »M.W., w. w..,»». ,»».«a '.,..w..:. «.. .......—w:iii:W,.,....«.,....»..» »,w«»_..ww» ,...,.».»,,.w_.n...:,.. ,.«=.".„,w.............*.«..w,.. ,.,...,.+.�� ..,,,,,. »..,.....w,,.,.«. ,..........,,«.«,...«.t:t.,....,.N».... .,«,w...,,ww 'INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. This project , is'` located, Mor•-e or lets, at the intersection of 'SW Pfaffle r Street and SW 78th Avenue and consisted of 9.mproving both roadways thereat ‘,., ill , , , 2— All construction 'work which was „ required to be performed has been , y completed and has withstood the 'required one year„guararitet period. , r H8, Subsequeht1 1:, staff recommends that the 'Council act to accept the work and allow release of the guarantee bond, " ■ ■ ■ ■ ........ .rw«.r ' ii•...1,.w..,...r W;"�•,».'.1 "'...»www..»w ww ..wWi,,Y.r..,..wwWY«w:.Nr..ir,.»w..wwr,.�4wM,,.1„1«w.,i..+wNwi. ..wl • ,,..wr...,......wLrl.4.,a.,•..,.-. •. •. •f•.,wrlmWil+M„wuw.w..wM.w uwwl ..,.wi,,,,,,N+l«.w,.NM,•.«,a '0314 1 ALTERNATIVES CQNSIU ED : f r '—.t,";--,.«...u.w... .,'..�.. .»,tH«w«wr.M+.:.i«:...:» '„ .,) ..... ''' `,'y.wl,..;uwM.w..."==e.•.......4..ti.cw��'i,...M+»wf..,-,.w.',.w.W.., ,—.4.r ,••...Y ww w wtw..•,..••....M..w..w....»..w.u.N...ltw.wwwww....+w:....�......+. +..twh..w'•.,•�•.w«w+•+. �w� N�•,w..��.�.,..'�I...L'_•`w.....wir...•••"»i.wl.�..»w.�i wi«.•..M....yit: 1 1 SUUGSTtt+ AGTlON Pass the "Rosohutiori of the Tigard City Council aoc-epti;ig- public provemer is 6:06structodH within the right- May of SW '• a'Pfle, Steet amid' SW 7gth Averioo ' ' adjacent to Crossroads COmmer cial Development, e w 411. 1 , . ; 1, , • • �4t ,. CITY Of TIGARD, OREGON (r RESOLUTION NO, 84-- G COUNCIL (aCCE la.L,i:NG PUBLIC :LMPROVEMEi:f1I•,I?:a 1 4' .� � 1�L;v:��JI..LJ"I";1•tJN or� I ill::, l�.X. ,AI2I:) �..I.I'Y Uiul.,,)::i•. CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE RIGHT-or-WAY OF SW PF"A FL E STREET 1 AND SW 78TH AVENUE 1`` 4. ADJACENT TO CROSSROADS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 1, .� ..r_.� L WHEREAS the City of Tigard required instillation of streets, !!ui,dewalks, ,! street lights, storm sewers, underground utilities and other public facilities for the development of Pfaffle Street and SW 78th Avenue; and • WHEREAS, the City further required the payment of fees and the execution of a Compliance Agreement which stipulated that "Upon receip t of certification by the Department of Public Work: :. t that all requirements have been met and a One Year Maintenance Bond, • the City Council agrees Ito accept the public improvements, subject �� to the requirements for correction of deficiencies and maintenance i. for a period of one year„ „"; and WHEREAS, said Certification has now been provided to the Council; and I WHEREAS the required performance bond remained in full force and effect ,, throughout the normally required maintenance period of one year; and 'I I* WHEREAS, no public improvement deficiencies remain to be corrected, it,, NOW, THEkEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: I The City Council accepts the public improvements constructed within the j, ' right-of-way of SW Pfaffle Street & 78th) Avenue adjacent to Crossroads i Commercial Development. PASSED:I rh�s d ay of f , 1. 86, �t • I 4r' 1 l 1! Mayor . City of Tigard ATTEST t r 1, I�epu y City Recorder C 1 ty of Tigard I (aH,bsf2259P ,,ii I i. ,, ( , id, , , ,,,,,4 , ,— . I 1 S ' . c, ' , • * 1 } F ' t ��•6 � •' � ' � 1%• t /�� 4 N j � G Y � !;'9 At""`,i! '• '!f.+y:nr ...W r '"'' �.,r 4� _/«.».(,r r.rr .m.A , /1 hP 1, ill W Mw+ p • ' , Yi• r 1 ." f { I' P 1:'I I I' a r t i . •r A. ' • ' t - • 1 3,:itte ,At , ' .5,' 111111-1 °G. ' W SHINGTON COUNT : IvEb tIII�i , 4 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING --'150 N. FIRST AVENUE ' „ 3 . HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 J ENE of BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DEPT,OF LAND'USE AND TRANSPORTATION Engineering/Survey Division WES MYLLENBECK, Chairman , : ' ; 2nd Floor • BONNIE L. HAYS, Vice Chairman, : : (503)648-8761 , EVA M. KILLPACK , JOHN E" MEEK • LU,I LLE WA F3 N September 11 , : 1984•' , City a w � of Tigard T ' 12755 SW Ash "„ Tigard, Oregon 97223 ' , Attention: Randy' �C1air'o : RE:, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW' 7-84 2S1 1OAC, TAX LOT�#1000 - S.W. BEEF BEND'' ROAD '', � . ' r For our records i",you Will f ind enclosed a copy of the recorded Dedication peed eda for road of Way along S.W. Beef Bend Road as 'required by 'onal right-of!- pp a Site Development Review 7,-84;' CPA 4-84 and ORD #84-27, granted by the City of 'Ti gard: : . I reco>r d,,9d ,thi s.'documenton August 31 , 1984 in the Washington County Book ' ' . of Records, with the appropriate signature on the Dedication Deed for an ' • acceptance by Washington County:' The Dedication Deed executed by McCulloch- Scott Properties, Inc. on August 30,, 1984, was recorded at Document , ' No. 84034888. , , , " Thank 'you for your cooperation in this ratter4 ` ' • Daisy :Reed ' Engineering �Technicia'n II b R�hs i Enclasure c: Robert seedy . 1000 Wi 11 amette Center '': Port1 and Oregon 972.04 • McCul 1 och-Hering, Homes 1703 Pacific Avenue I'j° Fores,t, Grove, Oregon',,' 97110, s Attn: Loren Hering g I flit C tdl oppoi ttyiity athplo,per n 1 i Q ■ Lu_I 0••••• 1 . ✓. r DEDICATION DEED 8 4 0 3 4 8 8 8 • KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that McCulloch-Scott Properties Inc., an Oregon corporation, hereinafter called the grantor being lawfully seized in fee simple of the following described premises, in consideration of the granting of Site Development Review 7-84; CPA 4-84; and ORD #84-27, which is the whole consideration, hereto fore granted by the City of Tigard, a political subdivision' of the State of Oregon, does hereby dedicate to the use of the public as a public way forever that certain real property situated in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, shown on the attached Exhibit "A" and being more particularly described as follows, to-wit. . A portion of that certain tract of land in the North 1/2 of Section 10, Township 2 ;.oath, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian described in an Agreement recorded in Book 785, Page , 439 of the Washington County, Oregon Book of Records, said portion being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the West line of said tract and the Northerly line of' S.W. beef Bend Road {C.R. No. A-l4S) a point which bears North 15.82 feet and West 223.00 feet from �•, the center'of said Section 20 and running thence along the Northerly line of said Beef Bend Road North 60°58'00" East 9 88.17 feet and North 89°27'00" East 339.68 feet to the South- • easterly corner of said tract; thence North 13°36'00" East „ tj along the Easterly line of said tract 5.16 feet to a point N that is 5.00 feet distant, when measured at right angles, from the said Northerly line of Beef Bend Road; thence parallel to ''- and 5.00 feet distant from said Northerly line South 89°27'00" Sn West 402.21 feet and South' ,60°58'00" West 86;66 feet to a point on the West line of said tract; thence South 00°00'57" West 5.72 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 0.06 Acres, more or less. • Basis of Bearing: Survey No. 20,736 Washington County Survey Records. To Have and To Hold, the above described and granted premises for the purposes . hereinbefore set forth unto the public forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor above named, by and through its President and Secretary has caused this instrument to be duly signed hereto. Dated this ;,,eD day of_• , 19 fL. McCulloch-Scott,Properties, Inc. B y ,// e /r r ____ cCulloch; res 'en ��- — By Cl ;;;? GlYl • 9 Don Scott, Secretary' STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of Washington ) BE IT REMEMBERED that on this 3e day of Q' 4e,...:Le--- , '19 ? . personally appeared bale McCulloch and Don Scott, Who bein duly sworn, did each say that he is the President and Secretary, respectively, of McCulloch-Scott Properties, Inc., ah Oregon,'corporation'and that the foregoing instrument was signed in behalf ' of said corporation by authority of its board of directors; and they acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. l� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year lfast above written: ,�►,,00 011iJ111(,� f ��A, ..'1 •.e, '`. ` to ,}r Po. ic for'�Oreg.n __�'��`� d"TAR My Commis ion expires z 2r rx /ti'p ♦F }.fit 'o s""' M lr i1 . .. jy♦� hW Accepted as a dedicated public road on behalf of • �� -��*�, g�'�. (��,,� � � � � � � the Board df� Commissfoner�s oi"��Washir�gtbn Cournty; . ° r t. �,,• Oregon, purusant to Resolution and Order No or o?,��`'� 78-208. ,,11„� Dated this l st day of August , 19 84 ■ After recording, please return to �+ I,�', \(: m ...� r Land Use & Transportation o'%'- County Surveyor - R. C Pearson i j ,. . ItA � � . EXHIBIT '1" 311g3 ___,......-------- J' • � k G ' N T j 0 �f 08 '10 ,(CR. o pp I 414;4'' x'g" 1200 • a 6 1300 1 4.14 AC , 1400 .3540 ,3 2.84 AC I z 93.29' SEE MAP ' 2S �1 10BD art AUG 6 1984 N,, w 'P40 n no s. O .1 Q _. 1 .-2,2.17..0©.0 6 C I .I` - _` v.. esso2.r m4 v.0 ►1w Oo i M� pj • 4 , O • s eso 27',W ' _.-..,. , 277 1 77zso' 1000 4,33 A6'; , r N V / (:)\:w 40 7z �` �J / Y r I . . v.,, r - , t co. .. too 1 • j;,` 4 o, ' 01 :, .1' ,�J� 34': 6°614)4'• h�� 6,,b . '379 5 STATE OF OREGOti '14 ., CoUni at Wu lilri'fen p 2`34:)ci ctN`ER OF SECTION (s h, A-148) V1,Doald .d'Aauoh,birect or of Asser�oeni ,0 Opp, aria for county,do hereby bertIfythat SEE M the within ihstrurnent of Writing was received �St'il 25 1 10C and reeordn„f ih i,,.,i..a, --i." .,r»„W.a, ,rr } t�'ohald W, Mason, Director of ° 1{. , l� essment acid Taxation, Ex- . 1 I ti 0 officio Chief Deputy Clerk L.lUig8tuG AUG 31 13,1412: 57 t e r • imerio y. • 4 w ue. •. 2,.rr1"14Y4L4..41 l.2.Mi 147'.^.Hr.,�1,11 2 u•dtts 4 rrr4A� fcv lN,.a ,'',:"'All u?M+y a{.rk pd�U+^ M K 1�a"'"a}'�,�14onl,.,.I,r ffiVi''P y i rfA74�r� "' .4 01r�0109i` f t I I City of ;, „., „.„ ,a, 15390 S.W. 116th Avenue . King City, Oregon II0 . 97223 19 � ::::1,',' August 15, 1984 y ®F TO ,y Mr. Gary Krahmer,° -- General Manager I Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County 1,50'N. 1st Street 1` Hillsboro;; Oregon 97123 • SUBJECT: FILE #8.OR 7 -84 WELLINGTON .STATES PROJECT, . N, S.W. BEEF BEND ROAD AT 'HWY. 99 CITY OF TIGARD.' 1 Dear Mr. Krahmer: Further to my letter of August 2nd and my phone conversation , , I with Mr Cruz, I have conferred with our City Engineer, Mr. n„ Harvey, who has established that they 8" condominium portion -; °-, ,of the line does not go under any building, but does pass "' ri underneath two patio areas. As Mr, Cruz informed is,, there ,Aid l' , would `be no objection to this. Further objection to our original '1, ,,. was voiced b Mr.. Cruz as being the existing sub- 1. ' proposal g sib ,z4,, standard six inch line. . . . In view of this, w e respectfully submit a revised plan whic h ,,„` ) would not conflict with the above mentioned objections k, and ' ,4, would e1 M` 8.s'• to the necessity of deep excavation, inconvenience '' and traffic i c ti pS and the gener 'l Y nature of , a tiraff,i " u. a t dangerous tore the construction, due to an extremely high rate of subterranean water, flow from Bull Mountain of which we have gained intimate , ' knowledge over the past 18 years. >nstead. bf digging tap andly,re .' ' placing the 319 feet, of,` inch pipe, install a new '8 inch line " ,,i f from across Beef Bend Road as follows: - EE•/ " SS 1) ACROSS BEES BEND ROA D TO S. J. CROWN DRI', 1 0 � 1 (2) THENCE DIAGONALLY IN S.W. CROWN DRIVE TO I I •A MANHOLE IN CENTER OE STREETI 130 r • (3) ALON4, S.W. CRo WN DRIVEOAMAN MANHOLE 210 I �,r 4) THENCE TO EXISTING MANHOLE NEAR CENTER OF I S.W, MAJE ST O LANE. NaWI� a iMrr ' , I TO TAL 8" PIPE 550 1. 1 „ 1 "t .,1 ,{•,Y. TOTAL .MANHOLES REQUIRED ..Y. .._ rx:I I ,I . 1 fi I F 4/4 . ryry 1+I II y Jru� k * .i e. 1 ,•N ..,l it I i . I I • , ,• Mii, N IiA •A.r.• i i i“1 111.1.}i.. I..”A a •;j`N:", .♦'✓i is .iil.''.".• 4"0,,". A,.1.,4r,','"'y f1,74'.', ,i.ki'SA A:1 1„ 1. e �r ^Yf1 f 1!A!1 �}�41A,Y'd ✓,''"1'�'+14U1n'tp1'M 1Y n � 1 W1.�'i{Ya,,d +�' �rW''�Ar��'ry AJ!H4 i a J , ♦ry ♦♦ i, 2". "A 1 f1��. f S.. u This route would avoid all ,the confusion and expense of re- 'placing the existing line and is only a little longer with i,l' 'no conflicts, We respectfully urge that you give this plan ,,',: , your urgent consideration. Dimensions are scales from the' " t � urgent enclosed• Aerial, which has our proposed route superimposed. x��ri 1 (. . upon l t. 1,.L . �r,, • . tt • 9r Yours sincerely, I I �, <� ��: 1 E r 7 • w .r•'+it p .r Denys Borman 1,'z�}l� City Administrator I ,,;"} r 3 ,1 .. ' , r', )4. r«` l r A�,+1{,,ffl Copies toy H R.B. Bancroft Hand Assoc. , , 140c n.E. Third; Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 h,,,,'�, r • i 't rl DmnIt�enn Chrr�n. agar Planning Comm. City of .�g .:,. , Bob jean, City of Tigard 'W Corp. (Dale McCulloch) .1 1 170 Pacific Ave. Forest Grrove; Or. 97116 ^ : Beverly Froude, ?CPQ 4, 12200 S.W. Bull Mountain 4d. ,` ,, . ' Tigard; Oregon 9224 M Ryan a !Brian 1134 S.�E'. 23rd Ave. Hillsboro, Or. 97i231..,,- • I Rick Da el s a Plann�n arector, :Washington County, ,,-,..,::1,; , F l •„ ,. , Dal Harvey,. City Engineer. King ty, Or. 97224 -- ,..•,,,,L,,...,-.., ;,,,,.;,,,o- , .f File ' (2 , 1 P , i1 ..,..:,-V,,,,, 1 d i i Pe� Y C ♦Y it a ,, r ill C} " y n1111I •t' N �rtr I i i , {{ Y i ii I a,. ».. ...,,+,.,.,xwaw.y.u.wr�, .n .., . Jvx�Wyr,,.{Ni' , ' ., '�^u Kt+marsd ...7 .. • 1,,, 4'..,..�:.4:�..tw:,�.r,«:.ibnr:r�wsanra,�rrru�rnY++�ud••,:•cu;�un,' �: t�ceftiit +-J�•d 4aerteiaro4tnq� lv • CityofhingCity �y'tz 15390 S.W. 116th Avenue ? ' King City, Oregon August 2, 198+ Mr. Gary Krahmer, General Manager •, • Un fi.ed Sewerage Agency . of Washington County 150 N. 1st Street Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 10. SUBJECT: FILE # 8DR 7--814. aE.GI►ING•CON ESTATES, PROJECT, ' S.td. , BEEF BEND ROAD AT H tY 99, CITY OF TIGARD Dear Mr. Krahmer: The above mentioned project is delayed pending the discovery ; ' , of a feasible route for disposal of sewage. Our City Enginee k • , A Mr.. -Tar a meeting on'August by M�, Dal Harvey, offers the following solution, endorsed King City' s Mayor and Council' at g g - 1r 1984. a tion King City o the ' The Condominum Association � � T of Kin C owns land bordering • i Beef Bend Road south of the project, and has an efficient sewer ,a system of City standards, conveying sewage to the King City , , system at a manhole on S.W. 116th Avenue opposite the Town Hall. It is suggested that this system be utilized for the Wellington Estates, constructing an outfall line from the Estates under Beef Bend Road through the space between the two ',carport buildings, thence across, nhole located in that immediate";' �.en across S.W.�.�V. Crown Drive to a ocat area. It must be stressed . is is a � property and that . . that this all private r • S.4. Crown Drive is NOT a City Street, but is wholly owned by .. (' the Condominium, Association. sewage from this connection flows through 319 feet of six inch pipe and 315 feet of eight inch pipe and three manholes, to the . ,7q; City S.W. 116th Avenue, invert.. City� `th'e C�, y �aah.hol.e on �: roue� ' The x. elevat�.cn, •�•t•, entrance ma' �,s at elevation of�2�.��0��, w�1d��Yerovdes a the x.ty � e 11!,, manhole invert of manhole t: . 5. + p 10 ft drop over a distance of 63 4 ft, or a slope of .005 which is exce1l*nt. 1 1 • Jc•, . ;� , . ++. r,n•• n°:odwr,eSrFO kGtilwnlrrk�,zaelw4r�.rwn2riN.ist yA�c r , '' ,d+N.+w.ry�„ �aa..fa;nt,-a✓r'lw�,al tiDl;t11`�rcvt!>rhrttMi{41,�8�Gi.,:�f.�rfn��r�v1r ,f'Yv"11,'U71ir�yr4iFb4°, a ' r ;,+ "�t �. � 1�.�E�7iF�i *U '!;•"'r• 1 �r'� at h'. IFr�r.�«u�iG'#n�ti�ia�i!�'�.i��,'�ni inrl p�• ,d >I f• ?I . c p„ 9 s ill In fact the line has a capacity far greater than any present planning might indicate, being very much underused, as it serves :t . only approximately 100 people, with a 4000 gallons per day flow. w,, N • I t i s� our opinion that it would be advantageous to all concerned ,� for the project to either acquire the condominium system or secure �'�' access and usage rights theretoe Since the line would serve not ' o 1. nly the Wellington Project but also future developments on the r,' remaining twenty plus acres in that watershed, USA would have do w keep this in mind. slr We therefore urge immediate action in this matter in order that '„k plans can be approved and grading be completed before the rainy ,gip, season commences. It is fei t that adoption of this 1ldgical plan will solve the problem of sewage diepn3al from ,the Bull Mountain ;' area which has been hampering development. ?i,r ;: `Yours very truly, 4 f, 1 , , e 1v;,+r ,, lj(��ta,,.} ,--- A ••.* • '`P.S•� i /'�,....�' .(;,(','F,,,, :!�., ir-,:y / f4/ �� ” r ,' 4,:,.i Denis Borman ;� . 4'''" City Administrator �; ° �, ; Copies to: R.E. Bancroft and Assoc. 140 N.B. Third, Hillsboro 9712 Commission, City of Tilt "i':',*r non Moen, Chinn. Tigard Planning . Y C n ,,a, Bob Jean, City of Tigard Iv,-# 4, . f W.G.K Development Corp. (Dale McCulloch) 170 Pacific Amief, r 4 14 X Forest Grove, or. 97116 _ s °° ' Iiµ' Beverly Froude, CPO 4, 12700 S. . Buhl Mountain. Rd. ,. i F: 4,,1, 1. -' Tigard, Oregon 9722 :; a. Ryan O 'Brian, 1134 S.E. 23rd Ave. Hillsboro. Oregon 971! ' Rick Daniels, Planning Director, Washington ,Coup 'w . ' I t ��x;ff,,, Dal Harvey, City ``n ine r, Kin City;Or. , .�;,r! File (2) '4'h ' ! r, r ,1 c, FYI! .4 t' � s I i I 1 n i i t� . c 'r r 1 �4 • „ t ,, , iii,,,A c . 0, ,,” M Y V' ` I i x J • A • �; t t:, , • • • yy ,t„ .I . S.:r •la h'!':Y,A1tY4.?F!I 'F,r -.• c4n' 1ricCu1'1'ocl • ering Construction Inc, 1703 Pacific Avenue • Forest Grove P.0, Box 546 . .Forest Grove, OR 971 16 • (503) 357.0622 (503) 640-2717 JUNE 20, 198 • JUN 20 � TPred Anderson CITY 865 w W Center S�,, � � � � � F TI��R� Tigard) Oregon PLANNING DEPT Subject : Wellington Estates, SDI: 7-84, City of, Tigard. Dear Mr. Anderson: . The purpose of this letter Ili to clarify our r. osition on 'tae r lan-- nino. Commission conditions of approval and the storm drainae sit- uations. As you recall yesterday June 19 , 1984 you, Loren Hering . • and �Pv an O'Brien reviewed ed� the tapes of the June 5, 1984 Planning Commission "-1ee Vir g from the close 'of the public hearing to the Pinal vote on the project . Those tapes revealed that condition three, .s numbered in the attached Minutes of that meeting, needs to be changed tb read "Sanitary Sewer" ,a s me r t rather than "Utility" ease- ment . Also another condition, needs to be added to state "that dri ve- wa ? locations and the storm, drainage system be worked out with staff, . . n r.ior to site IIdevelonment" . This conditl.on was specifically included ire the Plannin7. Commission motion of approvals All the rest of the conditions listed in the minutes appear to be correct. tale discussed this situation with both the Associate Planner, Keith Laden and lnne, the Planning Department secretary, they both agree that the and 1nie,ated that the above • conditions��c�.it��_ons need to be changed n,�es � �� , will occur before this Friday) June 22, 198)4 . lso discussed at your Meeting with Loren on June 19, was the storm ra nea e s ster. You said that you were lore at ease with the in- e L u:ti;;„on of the above stro m drainage condition in the o fPicial record, w also discussed taour conversation'with lene libel, an office, enc,neer • ?a)O at the w'vr1van about the nronosed storm drainage + a ditch on ODOT nrOri ert�r a long the east property r line f the sub le t n rnerty, You said that Oene felt, such a drainage ditch would be w y r'z o. � �ntable but that a ,� termit would be, requested from ODOT as We , � �� t� rani from the state would �b�P �. , '��,'`r��"'`'� that �.�,�.,�� !. be � a5 �'i(��t'y. as • 4 osnible. You raised concerns that this ditch needs to be designed adequate conicity to accomcdate nronex , y owned by you, oge r "i Ber zon and Fob ny;ra t cr.'' ,x LotR 1600, 2100, It 00 and 1200) . v{ae that a 4; that �.dr�qu�te capacity he available, but that we h.A`ti1' c' t ; rc over sneci fic storm d s. nare imnrrverrent > that the it o P ,, rnjl,S ,.rp ,r �, ;rd :a{� imbose on the above mentioned nronerties when theft deve1o'pe ty discus,sion with our engineer, lr 1 B ncro 't , sir ni ;ioant ,canaoit, " rw. w vw ilsrile to I.ccOMGdaM e the nrC 'erties mentioned abov?• '4 of � 2/ 1,, r- xnl :ltion of this fact is attached. I • Il .�* ,I { 11':'+ e-1'.I.. 11 -f',Y h'Y d4 i' •+,i h 1: Iv.f - j l• HK'' rt i'1 x.-_7.` .4 -+.r. .`i.,. . ...r.. .Y,f Y, r1...r a iY :Y-r1; .0 ,: '' . A .t• + d; :t+..a.. ;, {Y.,,a1„'S l3R r..3. . :: r .qtr: .:.�._•''�,�t��>+•++ Y &+ , Wv��, wy y fiVyli � 4" Sw, 1{ )I cCu11och- eying Construction, Inc + 4 1} � r',+4`�19iri • a�a 1 703 Pacific Avenue to Forest Grove . P.D. box 848 • .Forest Grove. 012 9711 (50,3) 557-0822 (503) 640 271 Page 2 Cont.')' In closing you indicated that you will not appeal the discussion of the Planning Commission to the City Council if this letter in prepared and delivered to ,you, I hope this letter .covers all your concerns and is an accurate representation of the comments present- ed by you, Loren irer1n -and Rya -.O-'-.fir-ien.. if you feel. .any changes to this letter are necessary, or if further information needs to be added, nlcase give Loren Hering or Ryan O'Brien a ce,P` 1. If we dont hear from you in writing by Friday June 22, 1984 final appeal . i date of this case we will assume you are in agreement with all the contents of this letter, Again, we stress that we intend, to keep you informed on the progress of the final engineering plans for this project and suppler you with those engineering plans for your inspect ion prior to construction. ( "Ie want to cooperate with you and satisfy your needs to the best or our ability, and we trust that you will dive us the same courtesy. _.✓'�� , If you have any "nuestions or comments , please give us a call. ,!!' r n }Teri n ./„,"4",„ , • ",0C 11och. r en a E9a (� eth 1,1 1='� 1 Oick Bancrort 1'111 Moriaham i i w J b.t l 1y.,,,i ..,.'. r, •,,.... ..,. ' ,. i.n...lrl. n 1,Lr..,,.,..,,, .r. .....,.•.. ,. a, ,., ,,....,..1•, ..r VI ...•.,., ..• ..e..w .. ...•, 1 a „u a .r i x I of.E E BAN POF q ♦ .. !S &AS9XIATES I N C O R P O R A TED ° CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND ZURVEYORS&PLANNERS 440 N.E THIRD AVENUE HILLSBORO,OREGON 97123 503/64841101 June 20, 1,984E • Loren Hering McCulloch -' Hering Homes 1703 'Pacific Avenue Forest Grove, Oregon 97116 • ,: WELLINGTON ESTATES - SDR 7-84 I J I l Dear Loren: This is to confirm my intention to design the storm drainage facilities to be con- structed in assor iatit n with this project to accommodate a 2$ year design storm from all up stream properties. Such a design will assume full development of the 74.2 acres upstream to the densities proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. , facilities to receive these waters will be located at three places, at the South- •• west corner of the site, at the Southeast corner of the site, and at the Northeast , . corner of the site. A.11 upstream properties can be drainei to these locations. The detention system is designed for your property only and will 11 dq nothing to protect • kin ; City from the development of the other properties. Very truly yours, 6 R. E. BANCROPT & ASSOCIATES,, INC. '? Richard E. Bancroft, P.E., P.L.S. Principal • r � rwinwvnvwiz,ar+'Mir+wrrwdwRS.r,wl+iviw,Ql'�a+riiw�au ixedd,w�ciW+t:ire�rrod,d, w.ar+din'ria..+vswewiari,aHMmw .. ., tibu'' u' fl / I K d a It � t, (' d , {. ' � tie r? CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon . NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION - BY PLANNING COMMISSION n ,\ • , 1. Concerning Case Number(s): SDR 7-84 2. Name of Owner: WGK. Development Corp } 3. Name of Applicant: WGK Development Corp. Address 1703 Pacific Ave. City Forest G�roState Or-Zip 97116 4. Location of Property: Address Northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific Hwy. , Tigard 1 Le al Description 2S 1 0AC lot 100 5. Nature of Application: Site Development Review for approval of a 80 unit multiple family residenti.a eve 1opthent. 6. +' Action: Approval as requested XX Approval with conditions per Planning Commission Minutes '" Denial of June 5, 1984 ' 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to XX The applicant & owners XX Owners of record within the required distance '� XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON Jane 22, 1984 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtai Tigard City Ash, P.O nl�ox 23897t1iT�. and n Ore... ._ 12755 S'W A �� . ` Department, T�. and C�.t Hall 1275 r �g f Oregon 97223. 9. A pp'eal 1 Any party to the decision ma� l this decision in accordance Any may appeal with 18.32.290(A) and Section 18:820370 which provides that a written appeal may be fi led within 10 days after notice is is gi ven and sent Y ' The r for ling of an appeal, is June 22 1984 They deadline foie �r 10. uestions: If you have any questions, please call the Git", of Tigard Planning ,Department 639-4171: Pr esx dent, Tigard Planning Cdtnrt� �Gian D ,TE PPa R C ,D . n , ( . , . • I •14 • • • COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION o Consensus of. Commissioner was to set over public hearing to a date certain ' arn�r the staff to research inconsistency with the proposal. Discussion follows regarding history of the proposal. o Commissioner ukler requeiyted staff provide more detailed information', for the site developm wt review. O President Moen suggesteaetting over to July 10th. 0 Director Monahan'' questioned 124, the Commission had any recommendations or direction regarding the variance to the one covered parking area per unit. ' did t see where they had met all the o Commissioner Butler stated he dx. Y variance criteria. Comm�.,ia T• " 'a Teed. ,. . s oner Owen s '! 0 Discussion followed regarding variance for co red parking. o Consensus of Commission was for the plan to inc de one covered ,parking space per unit • o Richard Boberg, NPO #7 Chairman, annou r c d tha t on 7th there would ro is be an NPO #7 meeting at City Hall to rereview t h proposal. o Commissioner Butler moved to continue SDR 9- 84 and V 9-84 t ' July 103 • 1 1984. Commissioner Peterson seconded. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. X5.4 SITE DF VELOPMEN T REV W SD R multiple D L w For approval of an 80 uni t f am family residential development. LOCATED: Northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific Highway, Tigard (Wash. Co, Tax Map 251 1OAC Tax Lot ,1000)• t' Associate Planner Liden reviewed staff's recommendation including t P Engineering's comments and Washington County's recommended conditions, . stating they needed some clarification regarding n g the lighting g and • improvements required for SW Bull Mountain Road. • NPO COMMENTS TS : i , i May � a and Bob Bledsoe, NPO # 3 Chairman, stated their, NPO had met on _. y _4 support the proposal'' with one member abstaining. they, Voted to s ort .t wxt mem APPLICANT Ryan y �. everything felt the sar they of p he id . . y nec�s y for approval. He reviewed: the la ou 0 Brian' stated t provided apps for �.several internal Y s. p they need for the exemptions nal setback changing Also fire and the Tan a . would 'be Chan .x:n to bawindows, They agreed with all conditions except for the requirement Y for Bull Mountain Road and frontage, as their project did not effect that street, He was also c oncerned wi th City Engineering Divisi' n condition. He felt they needed to sit down with City E n g ineer to work out details }� g thy. s ater� d o£ torirt �! drainage and access. j,. W PLANNING COMMISSION June. 5, 1984 Page 5 . r ' • I al ., 11.1. «._ , S x « d'+,. , PUBLIC TESTIMONY: 1 J o Fred Anderson, was for and against proposal. He favored the concept. He submitted letter and attachments on legal decisions and ` $ pertinent information regarding storm water drainage. He wanted to be assured that � ' the water problem is resolved prior to construction. He opposed the . , - setbacks of the 28 feet he felt it should be at least 50 feet. Also felt , Utility Easements should be drawn up to include sewer and approved prior, r« to approval ((({ p 0 Dick Bancroft, Civil Engineer for Applicant,', agreed there is a storm water drainage problem and have proposed a detention pond which should mitigate . any problems on downstream properties. Discussion followed. ` o Jean Youn g, Mayor King City, submitted and read'.� into the record a letter regarding the storm drainage problems, ; traffic problems -createrl by construction and, traffic problems in the Beef Bend/99W area. . 0 Roger Anderson commented that the conditions of the CPA and ZC were not included as conditions of approval. He did not want the, applicant to be able to ehange from the plans submitted. Wanted to see dedication of ,1. utility easement prior to occupancy permit. CROSS EXAMINATION & REBUTTAL o Ryan O'Brian' stated they have no problems with utility easement or having to comply to CPA and ZC conditions. 1 He then addressed 1 setbacks along the northerly boundary. He also kelt (information ' submitted from Fred Anderson dealt with Agricultural Land and did not apply to Urban De'brelopment. :' 1 o Discussion on open space/recreational area, storm drainage and sewer PU"k3L:LC HEARING CLOSED I o Commissioner Eyre supported with conditions from Engineering and r . Washington ington County. � o Co.mmissioners Butler, Peterson and Vanderwood supported the proposal. ' u� Commissioner Owens supported with staff checking checkin with County regarding' . signal on Bull Mountain. 1 ( . a President ,Moen commented that driveway proposed was the best alternative and supported the proposal,: n �t Site r Ctmtxts i onetCwetts moved to approve ,� e Development review SDR 7-$4 I; 1 i I • u� � I � e t to the ,l f o l�.orG��.ng conditions:t'id x t ici ns� 1 I. The landscaping plan shall be modified in order to meet the visual 1 , clearance requirements s of the Code (CDC 18., 1 OZ u �'he � landsca '�.n materials� ��}" y r a1s� shown� on the �1a1 r � , issuance landscaping plan shall. be inst.al.led, prior to the the �SU t�1C� '� of occupancy G, u ..., er`11LLS: x'11, � � : E 34 A 4 1-t easement shall be provided from heel Bend Road to the , r northerly property line prior to oecupanuy Il c1 PLAN ;TrC CO*0 8ION June 5, 1984 Page 6 ( . r r • « r , • , 4. A 6 foot high,h sight ht a bscurin g f A n ce shall be installed 1e d along the e t northern property line prior to issuing occupancy permits. ' 5. The building setbacks shall be as shown on the applicant's site plan labeled "Plan 7601", reviewed by Planning, Commission on June 5, 1984. 6. This is valid for period on . � is approval i p od of one year. 7. The two driveway accesses, storm drainage and holding tank specification to be worked out with staff. • 3; 8. Obtain access permit from Washington County. Access permit will issuance ,. address roadway drainage and sight distance prior to ssuance of a building permit �.' 9. Assure construction of a sidewalk to County standard prior to issuance of 'a building permit. ' * 10. Dedicate additional right-of-way-wa Y to provide 35 feet from centerline of Beef Bend Road adjacent to the site prior to issuance of a ♦ building permit. 11. Assure installation of street lights (staff to clarify if these mean illuminating) at the access drive and at the intersections of the front4i a road with both Bull retain Road (staff to clarify that g l I►lout� oad � y tha Bull Mountain' is necessary) and Beef Bend Road prior to issuance of a building permit. Comissioner Butler seconded by motion. • M otio n carried unanimously nanimously by Commissioners present. i. 5. PEAL HOP 4-84 FEf.D MORENO NPO # 3 o Monahan viewed package of information that was submitted to the Planning ', .ion on how to proceed. Commission. iscuss p ed o Bob Bledsoe, NPO Chairman, stated the NPO unanimously supports the I, p appeal especially on t . grounds that apparently a falsE application had been submitted. elson requested the �.,• lxcant speak first. I � o Attorney Jars q P P o APPLICANT: Fer d Moreno, 14430 SW M cF and, responded to allegations m ade by the appellant o Discussion followed on the lateness of the hou; and when would be a good d time to continue to the hearing to. i � 12th 1 Planning o Commissioner Butler moved to continue IIbP 4-84 to the e P a�n g Gomais l„ion meeting. Commissioner Peterson s econded e otion carried AI unanimously by Commissioners preSett. Staff noted the neat meeting would be held at the Tigard' School e trict o a � Building on Pacific Highway. 9' PLANNING COMMISSION June 5i 1984 Pag e 7 n a / RYAN O'BRIEN Planning Consultant 1134 S.E, 23rd Ave. Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 • (503) 648-4061 V .,l :x't .N U. ,, a .Y .r .. __.�._�. •• w. Keith Liden, Associate Planner June 8, 198 City of Tigard P. O. Boy 23397 9 3 , Tigard,, Or. 97223 la15. 63 Subject: McCulloch, Hexin g Homes Driveways. JUN I. 3 19$4 I .. C 1 Dear Xei. Attached please find revised copies of alternative driveway approaches and letters from ODOT and Washington County on a second driveway for Wellington Estates. The letters indicate that one major driveway at the most southwesterly corner is the best location. The current Tigard code requires two driveways, 21 feet i n width t�.'� for 50 to 100 units. After a review of these requirements, we offer the followinrg findings : 1 . Because of the sight distance problems,' only one driveway is possible on Beef Bend Road for normal everyday in and out traf ft c. 2. The State prefers that the driveways be located furthest away from the intersections as possible: 3. A second driveway could be developed on the frontage road. However it would not be practical , as the frontage road may be vacated in the future. Farther, the traffic study prepEi,red for this project indicated ( that traffic!. should not be on,couraged. to use the frontage road because of traffic conflicts at the Bull Mountain and Iror.tage Road intersection. A driveway on the . frontage road may increase traffic at this intersection. 4' We have considered snaking the existing driveway larger to accommodate 2 entrances, zits or both, but we found that it serves little pun- 5: a e 7�t o n v of the C od e and the main reason for the 2 driveway wa re- quirement is to accomodate emergency vehicle access in the event one ,,' of the driveways is blocked off. With this intent in mind, we feel the best solution is widening the existing driveway to 36 feet at Beef Bend Road and widening the pavement to 30 feet all the way back to the "Y" in bhe parking lot so that 3 travel lanes would be available. Beyond the >UyU a 30 foot access is not necessary because 2 accesses are available. In conjunction with the widening of the existing driveway, a second dri veway 12 feet wide would be built between 2 and 3. The second driveway would be for emergency access ' only and not for normal in and out resident traffic. 111',1 r ` mL.W.,..,' 'W._- a+kh%" ,I+wIMAV+NVYWI�N4W MN�T+�i - irntrlrM�• C a X14 Page McCulloch, Hering Driveways Conclusion This proposed alternative described in finding 5 above is the best solution to the code requirements and the transportation problems in the area. Two driveways 36 and 12 feet wide provide better access than two 24 foot driveways. This alternative meets the intent of the code by providing a total of 48 feet of driveway pavement and secondary emergency access. Under normal conditions, this emergency access will be blocked off. However, there will be a driveway entrance off Beef Bend Road and the interior parking lot. This driveway will contain concrete sufficient in strength to handle a fire truck. Grass will be planted over the access so that it will not be visible. The fire and police departments, and the residents, will have knowledge of this access and will use it in case of .'emergency situations. I I R.2.1121± I I �--�. Please review this information and send me a letter indicating your response. We have reviewed this alternative with Frank Currie, and he is in agreement provided the Planning Department agrees. 8 ere • r 0 era.-n c. c. McCulloch, Hering Dick Bancroft . I rN Y.1 n. / I ( y , IV 1 f‘fsi I ti r e .44 ilie 1 , , , ;,,, '. 2'0 . a � II 1 �. -•-. �. �' ¢! t t �, 1 i••1111N11115 �� • • l ^------" 'ems" ,' rl1 —`" r°' i 1 , r' . . I •,. ' ii3O„,,, • a � ,,,�• • .. i a si 1 9„.L.i!sr 40' (Li , (rtfial0A1---c, ,'' • _4, nim..., ,,,, WASHINGTON COUNI-il i,, 11 6' ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1.50 N. FIRST AVENUE r . , ftlire":114, HIL.LSBORO, OREGON 97124 1 • M BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DEPT,OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION t, Engineering/Survey Division VVES MYL L.ENBECK, Chairman 2nd Floor '; • BONNIE L. HAYS, Vice Chairman ' EVA M. KI LLPACK (503)648-876 1 , JOHN U LLE WARREN 1 JUN 1 1 19i CITY OF TIGARD �I ' June 7, 1984 p j NNING DEPT. • Mr. Keith Laden e City of Tigard 4 . P.O Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: MC CULLOCH HERING HOMES PROJECT • BEEF BEND ROAD � . The applicant s proposal for a single access to the above referenced project on Beef Bend Road is acceptable to the County The location of the access point as indicated on the plans is the best location i in consideration of available sight distance and spacing between i ntersections. If a second curb cut is re qui red for a camouflaged emergency enc eh`c q g g y v � 1 entrance an access permit is required by the County. /44,1--- , :;E:),171/4,„1.--. . . ; . June Carlson Dahne Transportation Planning Coordinator I I p( JCD:ss c Ryan 0'Cri en ,,. • • • an e uif l a� /ortun t e)nplo. e.P ( A a Y • I , 1 a • • • maw '4 . A I "tt ”11•,° t 44 '- Oregon State Highway D vision DISTRICT 2A MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR VICTOR ATIYEH P.O. BOX 565, BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075-0565 PHONE 229-5002 GOVErAOR �Isss�sr�vrs:' June 6, 1984 In Reply Refer to / I File No.; Ryan O'Brien 1134 5,E. 23rd Ave. Millsboro, OR 97123 RE: Access to Beef Bend Rd. Y , Dear.Ryan: Our traffic engineer reviewed the plan for the proposed con- dominium project near the intersection of Beef Bend Road and 99W. TIe determined that traffic would be best served by to-- cating a single access as far as possible from the intersec-- . tion. Another access close to the frontage road intersec-- • tion would create a hazardous traffic situation. 1• Sincerely, C. T. Plink Supervisor Assistant District Maintenance Supervisor CT�.i:ljb • I I i 555 ti Form 734-�� I I d a r , d • ..,.. ., '', . :.: : ,„. vrd,-^cori's 1 , • : : ," , , : ' , , : . , : ' : „ if...e.4 IA Li. d.,(11 . Li- •: 6? 7 il>w 6 i W r. £S H I 1 \ G T O N U O U N : ' x.41 —T1 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING -- 150 N. FIRST AVENUE ' ., •\ •��! HILLSBORO,R OREGON 97 � 97124 , . ` h'ECs� DEPT,OF LAND USE'AND TRANSPORTATION . BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Engineering/Survey Division WES MYLLENBECK,Chairman ' 2nd Floor ' ' ' BONNIE L. HAYS, Vice Chairman ' EVA M. KILLPACK LLPACK (503)648-B761 • JOHN E. MEEK . ' y LLICILLE WARREN'° ■ 'dune 5, 1 984 a n Ryan: 0 Bric. , y 1 34 SE 23rd Avenue' . Hillsboro, OR 97123 ' ' 'RE. OJECT, MC CULLOCH HERING HOMES' PR ' • .' ', TIGARD :PLANNING COMMISSION , BEEF BEND ROAD „ I have ,reviewed' above referenced, application, viewed the site and submit . the following Findings of Fact and 'Recommendations . FINDINGS OF FACT !, 1) 1 Beef Bend Road is a, County major collector. ' ' . b 2) Existing r7 ght--of-way on Beef Bend Road is 30'feet, from centerline; . . required right-of-waright-of-way'wi dth' for a major col 1ector is 35 feet from centerline. 3) Beef Bend koad was overlaid in the 1981 Serial Lev y Pro ram a providing g acceptable roadway structure. ' 4) Roadway' width meets the 22 foot minimum acceptable width requ'i rement.. 5) Surface condition is good with no noticeable cracks 'or potholes, " , ` (,: : 6),7 Sight distance is acceptable' for cars exiting the s�i to and' entering from the east, however', sight' distance i s' restrictecrifol. eastbound motorists turning left onto the site. The, restriction s created, by vegeation on ,,, er.. the south side of the roadway ' . Sidewalk `s � ontage of ;dway and x7 along the f are a requirement ` s do hot e .,t raa ' of the County Community Development Code for 'all land divisions and new ;' / constructi o:n, . ' 8) The tr afF1 d im aGt an l si s lows t 1a t' CouYt �oadwa y s w i 11 function at an ' adequate level of serviw hthisdevelopment., The consultant recommends the installation street lights at the access drive, located 500 feet west of Pacific 'Highway and at 'the intersections of the frontage road with both Bull Mountain and Beef Bend Roads: r , a I 1 er util opportunity employer a' If . . `'IA Ryan O' Brien Paget RECOMMENDATIONS. • The following are recommended for conditions of approval for this development: Prior to issuance of a building permit -- • 1 ) Obtain access permit from Washington County. Access permit will address roadway drainage and sight distance.. 2) Assure construction of a sidewalk to County standard. 3) Dedicate additional right--of-way to provide 35 feet from center- line of Beef Bend Road adjacent to the site 4) Assure installation of street lights at the access drive and at the intersections of the frontage road with both Bull Mountain Road and Beef Bend Road, • 4 June Carlson Dahne rans ortation Planning n. Coordinator T p g I I i JCD:ss c: Keith Liden • • I fr I IiIF , ' p ae , STAFF REPORT '. AGENDA ITEM 5.4 4 JUNE 1984 7:30 P.M. • 5, 9$4 7 30 P .. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI 10865 S.W. WALNUT , TIGARD, OREGON 97223 ! A FINDING ING OF FACT 1. General Informations CASE: Site Development Review SDR 7-84 m REQUEST: For approval of an 80 unit multiple family residential development I! APPLICANT: WGK Development Corp. OWNER: Same , w 1703 Pacific Ave.' Forest Grove, OR 97116 A , LOCATION. Northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific Hwy. , r Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10AC lot 1000). ; 2. Background . .The property was annexed to th e C it y on February 8, 1978. A zon a change ge _ from the Washington County RU-20 to City C-P (Commercial Professional) was approved on June 12, 1978. A conditional use application to F establish a 146 bed home for the aged was approved on July 25, 1978, On May 14, 1984, City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA 4-84), and Zone Change (ZC 4-84) to change the Plan designation from Commercial Professional to High. Density Residential with a corresponding - ,.. zone change from C-P (Commercial Professional) to R-40 (Residential, 40+ units/acre), The following conditi ons were attached to this approval: , a. Public sanitary sewer within public easements shall be provided to the north property line of the subje t property. n The � d shall be limited t+ b. ��'� � - northerly row of units Its �sh to two stories and garAges shall not be , located between these units and the north property line c. site A six foot high °� obscuring chain link fence shall be located q along the north property line. d. A m inimum 35 foot setback' in accordance e, with the approved Variance V 6-84, shall be maintained along the property to the north designated low density residential. STAFF REPORT - SDR 7-84 - PAGE l • G. • I e. Development plans for the subject property shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission. During the review the Planning Commission shall address utilities, storm drainage, placement of . • buildings, landscaping, and traffic circulation and impacts. In April, 1984, Planning Commission approved Variance V 6°84 mentioned above, to allow more than 6.25 units per acre within the northern 100 1= fee■M. of the property. 3. Vicinity Information Multiple family residences within Icing City are situated on, the south) side of Beef Bend Road. Large acreage homesites in Washington County ' lie to the west and northwest. These properties are designated in the ' '' Tigard, Comprehensive Plan for Low'Density Residential development (1 to 5 units/acre). Undeveloped land to the northeast is within the City and is zoned C-P, Beef Bend Road is under Washington County jurisdiction and is classified as a major collector. A frontage road for Pacific Highway is immediately east of the property. The parcels north of the subject property and land to the east and west is considered as a "Developing Area". 4. Site Information and Proposal Description Except for one residence on the property which will be removed, the parcel is undeveloped. The property slopes downward from an elevation in the northwest corner of 310 feet to 242 feet in the southeast lcorner. ,, The southwest section of the parcel as well as the northern and western • property lines are wooded with a combination of coniferous and deciduous ' trees. The remainder of the property is cleared. • The applicant is proposing to establish an 80 unit condominium project. Each unit will have two bedrooms, 64 square foot covered patio and one ,» garage space One driveway onto Beef Bend Road will be provided for the development. The internal driveway/parking area will form a loop through the ' project. The coverage of buildings and pavement amount to 76 percent rt of the total lot area and 24 percent will be landscaped or left in it • • natural state. An exemption is requested for some of the internal setbacks between the ° g ara g es and residential buildings. The Code allows for setback exetn Lions Which do not exceed 2 p reduction the required w ack. 0 the Code prescribes s se ara n d 0 erce eduction of Section 1�l. 6 03 of t" sptb Sectio 4 p esc;ri.be separation distance betweeu buildings depending upon upon th e presence or a bsencr o f windows on the building involved. In several instances, ,a 14 foot setback between a garage and a wall including windows is proposed ,instead of the 15 foot , standard. Near the northeast corner of the project, one garage will. have an 8 foot setback rather than the required 10 foot setback. • I I I STAFF P.EPOkT SDP 7.84 PAGE 2 +A Yl I 5. Agency and NPO Comments' The Engineering Division comments will be available for the hearing. The Building Inspection Office and NPO # '3 have no objection to the proposal. The State Highway Division indicates that the traffic impact study submitted by the applicant is being sent Co the Region Traffic Supervisor for review. Also, on site storm water detention should be provided. No response has been received from Washington Coui.ily or the Tualatin Rur.'al Fire Protection District. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposed development is basically consistent with the Code ' provisions of the R-40 zone, the Site Development Review chapter, and the conditions of approval for CPA 4-84 and ZC 4-84. There are several aspects of the project which require modification. 1. A 6 foot high, sight obscuring fence must be provided d alo ng the northern property line as required by the CPA 4-84 and ZC 4-84 approval. property northern opt ro 2. A 'utility.. easement must be established to the' n h p p y line, also as a con d it ion of CPA A 4-84 an d ZC 4 -84 approval. The e landsca ing plan lan ad acent to the driveway entrance to. Beef i.' P J Bend Road should be modified to conform with the vision clearance requirements in �.the Code. Several trees will need to be moved or eliminated in the vicinity of the driveway. • internal Setbacks must be granted 'for several or In addition site' exemption �� or a revised site p lan will be necessar . The following criteria should be considered when reviewing a ''setback exemption 1. An exception which is v r t greater than 20 percent of the required uired setback; e in terms o light, noise 2. �� No adverse affect to adjoining proper �. s i � g �, levels, and fire hazard; 3, Safe vehicular and pedestrian access to the site; 4. ' A more efficient use, of the site which should result in more ' , landscaping; and 5, The preservation of natural into the overall design of the project; incorporated features which have, been incor STAFF REPORT - SIR 7-84 PACE ' P . • • 1 The applicant has addressed the above criteria within the narrative for the project. The proposed setback exemptions appear to be consistent with the intent of the Code. Issues dealing with drainage, traffic, and other item that are under the • jurisdiction of the Engineering Division shall be discussed by staff at ' • the hearing. C. RECOMMENDATION , The planning staff recommends approval of Site Development Review SDR 7-84 subject to the following conditions: 1. The landscaping plan shall be modified in order to meet the visual clearance requirements of the Code (CDC 18.102). 2. The landscapiig materials shown on the plan shall be installed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. II 3. A utility easement shall be provided from Beef Bend Road to the f • , northerly property line. 4. A 6 foot high, sight obscuring fence shall be installed along the northern property line prior to issuing occupancy permits. 5. The building setbacks shall be as shown on the applicant's site plan labeled "Plan 7601", reviewed by Planning commission on June 5, 1984. 6. This approval is valid for a period of one year. '.• 1 Q NOTE: Additional recommended conditions based upon Engineering E Division comments shall be presented at the hearing. Vii, { I if rt PREPARE' BY: Keith Liden APPROVED BY William A. Moti han � Associate Planner Director of Planning & Development (0463P dmj) Cf ri 0 j,. 1 ' • , I STAF?. REPORT - SDR 7-84 , PAGE 4 I . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING . STATE OF ORI;COIN ) County of W shington ) ss. City of Tigard • } I, Kathleen Reffett_ , being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: That I am a office aide for City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served notice of hearing of the i. Tigard Planning Commission Ili , of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the 25th day of Mai 198 by mailing to each of them at the address shown on �the attached list (Marked Exhibit B), said notice as hereto attached, desposited in the United States Mail on the , day of May � 19 , pos tage prepaid ,7„„i/)4 r / ' I k Secretary Person who delivered to POST OFFICE S i b`sa ibed and sworn to before me on the day of ,,u:_ , 198 pe. .:-► I llnx L'r4,iM1.Y� � NOTARY" PIJELIC: OF OREGON l i( 4 ' My y Commission Expires: b•� --0t'c 6'" w t x. II I I I • NOT I CE O F P U B L I C H EA R I N G Notice is hereby g iven that the Tigard Planning Commission, at its meeting on Tuesday, Tune 1984 at 7:30 P.M. , in the lecture room of Fowler Junior High School, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, , will consider the following application: FILE NUMBER: SDR 7-84 APPLICANT: WGK Development Corp. OWNER: Same Dale McCulloch 170 Pacific Ave. Forest Grove, Oregon 97116 . REQUEST: Site Development Review approval of an 80 unit residential development and related facilities on property zoned R-40 (Residential, 40+ units/acre)). Also an exception to the • code to reduce the separation between buildings without windows from 10 ft. to 8 ft. LOCATION: Northwest corner of B eef Bend Road an d SW Pacific 'Highway, Tigard (Wash. co. Tax Map 25] lOAC, Tax Lot 1000) ee a to on reverse side) `Phe ublic hearing on this will,matter w• be conducted in accordance with the p b rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Community Development ' Code and rules of mrocedurey attend I the Planning Commission. Any persons having interest in this • heard, or testimony entered into • and be initial hearing, be submitted in writing to be I ted e' t. the record of the � g { For further information. . pleas.e contact the Planning D•.epart,.m ent at 639-4171. I TIGARD CITY HALL, 27 55 S.W. Ash Avenue (Corner of Ash Avenue & Burnham► street), or contact your Neighborhood Planning Or$a nix atxo n (NP 0) � 3 ' Ghairperso n Bob B l e dsd e... Number Phone .. 635-893...7 • .,.. ._ (pm/0257P) •y M \ . . f • n f ... . /1 ., - f• -_ `, S"894 27. X77` _ _ - - _ - •X10 _ _ _ i•� ,�.:��. :. .-�...:_."..�- _ 772.60= _ r • - - I 1__000: ,: 433 AG: ' HI— 6 - ` ,� s r `f: ...; •,,". t------.- 70© Z' 'p t • ' 1. '\:. - • (C S. 100571 1 _ :- . . --- - / . ! . 1 �o, 8•(---:-__ r _ --$111• fl•a- .. CENTER OF SEC'UON" (CR.. A148)- ' re 11A _ 251100 r : . ' °', WL$ Development: Corp. /, Be near!: Kbty ti' � Dale McCul1ock, Vice President ' 21 U Summit Drive l` 114/0 SW Crown Drive 1/ 1 1703 Pacific Ave. Lake Oswego, Or. 97034 Tigard, Or. 97223 Forest Grove, Or 97116 Ryan O'Brien Harding Griffith 1134 S.E. 23rd Ave. 11535 SW Crown Drive # 3 11470 SW Crown Drive # 3 Hillsboro, Or 97123 Tigard, Or. 97223 Tigard, Or. 977;23 r Sam Beacon Scott, John McComb 1 1 125 N.E. Weilder 11575 SW Crown Drive 4I 2 11470 SW Crown Drive # 4 Portland, Or. 97220 Tigard, Or. 97223 Tigard, Or. 97223 Bob Bledsoe NPO # 3 Shettler Johnston 11880 SW Walnut 2921 SW Sunset Blvd. 11480 SW Crown Drive # 2 Tigard, Or. 97223 Portland, Or. 97201 Tigard, Or. 97223 " WESTON INVESTMENT CO. Daily Tethereau 2 154 NE 'Broadway 11575 SW Crown Drive # 5 11480-1 SW Crown Drive Portland, Or. 97232 Tigard, Or. 97223 King City, Or. 97223 K'i g City Condo/TD(; Koch May 15300 SW 11520 SW Crown Drive SW Boones ''Ferry Rd. 1 16th Ave.Ave.�� 1520 S e �� 10 � 16683 Tigard, Or, 97223 Tigard, Or. 97223 Lake Grove, or. 97223 JECKWITH / JONES Lyons Bradfish 11495 SW Crown Drive # 2 11520 SW Crown Drive # 9 15150 SW 133rd . Tigard, Oregon 97223 King City, or. 97223 Tigard, OR. 97223 ' 0. CHEEK, Ralph & Janet El1/Frison Heid Bockumer 139 � � � � � � �� Tigard, Drive Crown Drive �� 2 11510 SW Crown Driv # 5 1 1560 SW 31 gard, OR. 97223 Tigard, Or. 97223 West Germany F1 Comstock stock Lyn f c;h�� . . ; � a 11525 SW Crown Drive i 2 11490 SW Crown. Drive 11560 SW Crown Drive �/ l I Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard, Or. 97223 Tigard, Or. 97223 Kaufman % Ficken VanBuren Russell ' 1 1525 SW Corvft Drive t/ 1 11470 SW Crown Drive 11560 SW Coown Drive '# 3 Tigard, Or. 97223 Tigard, Or. Tigard, Or. 97223 IseatSon Bay` ee 16780 8W 11490 1 r. � � �0�. ��: Unit w1�� 'D�iv s�� cx��x1 � � e Tigard, O r. 9722,3 Tigard, O . 97223 Tigard, Or, 97223 ( A Foster/7 Hallock ■ th t—son 4620 -F SW Caldew 11550 SW Bull Mtn Rd. 1 Portland, Or. 97219 Tigard, Or. 97223 j Heino Paik, IL SUNG 11550 SW Crown Drive # 1 11575 SW Beef Bend Rd. , King City, or. 97223 Tigard, Or. 97223 Bstabrook Martin % Edwards PO Box 697 9400 SW Buckskin i . 97005 a Or. 97145 Beaverton, Or. 9 Tolovana, x 5 45 , 9 Pfaedner Collins 11550 SW Crown Drive # 4 15300 SW Royalty Parkway Tigard, Or. 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 Miller Martin % Edwards 11520 SW Crown Drive �� 12 11695 SW Beef Bend Rd. Tigard, Or. 97223 Tigard, Or. 972,,.,.1 3; Mills Anderson 7749 SW 51st 11550 SW Bull Mta Rd. Portland, Or. 97219 f Tigard, Or. 97223 f, I • Houghton ton Wyatt a tt 11510 SW Corwn Drive # 7 PO ,Box 3521 Tiard, Or. 97223 Simi Valley, Ca. Tigard, 9306'. Springer Anderson 11490 SW Coma Drive # 4 PO Box 23006 Tigard,drd Or 97223 Tigard, Ore. 97223 • Woerner % ~chi nsori Dennis Borman' 12000 SW Bull 'in ltd. King City Admin. Tigard, Ord, 97223 15390 SW 116th Ave King City, Oregon 9722:1 Lewis Washing ton Count y Land Use & 11855 SW Beef Lend td, Transportation Tigard, Or. 97223 150 W. First Ave. Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 hrtin 0670 SW Bull. Mt, Rd. TIgard3 Or. 97223 • : ( City of lung Cit 15390 S.W. 116th Avenue' King City, Oregon 97223 June 4, 1984 City of Tigard'' Planning Commission Ti gad s '0 Oregon 9?2" 3 Re- File Number SDR 7-84 W.G b K Development Corp. GentIemenu The City of King City is concerned with three situations in connection with this proposed development, These are: 1. Storm water drainage problems 2. Traffic problems created b construction 3. Traffic problems in the Beef Bend-hiway #99 area. • t Referring to ��#1. The Kin g City sy stem has b een adequately ely caring for storm water from this area for. nearly 20 years while lend was a pasture. This project will change r It 4.25 acres)0.1 o tp sure to a paved area consisting of about 2 acres of roofs and another acre or more of paved streets, sidewalks driveways. Therefore, although no added : . sidewalks and driwa, water will be supplied, the speed of run-off will be radic- ally increased. our opinion with ' this, ,The Project system cannot 'b� w � h,a �.! (c expected P �. . "ect :��. ine � e e Engineer . ted� to ,cope . � er hats core, firmeEngineer oupinion. 'fToAcoope with this condition, the Fro- j f • , 1 .�a,.,� a solution consisting of installa- tion n, small detention basin p o rty, designed to maintain the speed of run-off to which f speed which now�,:eicibts: , We agree with th as s olUt r - this 4.25 acres but relUest that we be giv en the o pport unity to check and approve the final design when it is available. What aid to be done about remaining 'd.° ►cres � '� th as de- veloped?`veloped A 'detention basin for every project? �� ( ... ' Referring to #2. Traffic problems created by construction This primarily refers to proposed sanitary sewer on Beef iea Road. to and into King City on 116th Ave. According ng to pre- liminary plans this line will be quite deep, creating a con- siderable spoil b ate and requiring some time to construct. There is no detour available. Hence t edisruption to traffic on Beef Bend and in the City will be considerable. This i a U S.A problem but we are making our concern about it a matter of record at this time. e a Referring to #3 -Beet Bend and Hiway 99 intersection. The u unsatisfatory conditions at this intersection are well known. We find no mention' of any solution to this problem' in the plans we have seen Get /-) S Jean K. ` u 'rc IvlaskzE, `'" ✓ R' ,,,�� ,�K•..fir r' Y . d D. Harvey, A?Af, City Engineer t" • I s f - - - _. a - - _ _ - ? TIMER PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal Notice _ P:O_BOX 370 PHONE(503).684-0360 7--64 86 BEAVER°'uON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising. JPj , *` 0 Tearsheet Notice CjT' -_ city o f 7,4-Qard i-iF p,,� . 20 Box 23397 a 0 Duplicate Affidavit Tigard, OR 97223 =- i 3 a _ - _ - - _ a - <� ,- _ _ Y ria.AFFiDAVIT OF PUBLICATION . y a ^A Vim° y y iT ms,,y� ,--3.-9. ----,,,,-.-.- ..4,----:-0,,f-.4e,44,3 -3 • -,,s . -_ _ STATE OF� �1_ ss ----04--......--_ Y- ; _ - . , � _ - - r COUNTY'OF WASHINGTON . - _ : Susan-.- .: _ - • _ - -•w`i^♦.tr.s• - p•°.�—� rte„ - - P ZINC e �p--, _ - __ ..0:;-,-,.-.- a-- Y that I am the Advertising, � -_r"---.. �, _ _ _ ,. , say_° � _ - _fi -. being.first duly sworn, depose and i Director,or his principal clerk,.of the Tigard Times :��'-�- -= efinedinO# 3 133.010 `'�-;=_ � -. - newspaper of general-circulation as- d . :.;-:0–`'W - r t a _ .: Tgard _ __,,,.."4- - � _ - and 193'.020,,published at ..---...-.-1-- - - `" _ - 'n;Cher -� �.. •°� �-_ �-� �r Q � .�,�Y .�i ;� � � - aforesaid.county and state;that the - ` ' -.�_.. Public Hearii gs • - ' . _, . -.,� t - - - - --_ - - - -- - ?ti `a, «,.- - sue, ;'- 3 �,> .,c_ "- -- - --- _- -- - - .• - a.printed;_copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the. -_ _ . y ,,` . ,-.01_._.,,,,_... .,_. • t : == ,entire=issue-of said newspaper for successive and jit =,--- • - consecutive in.the following.issue_st r ` — ‘7,..-.7.7,..:' ,1W : ;1110 :; =s May 29 38 ",,,t,,,,,--_ x - ` .. yam^ � ` ` F` a . .-? `xc"- j IT1LI• ,-.3 t - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ ` �.2- � -i _ �I L \� ?'i. .�=.1Cy� S +_A.y. 'M .}. .5- 1." - __ ♦ � _ - _ - ---_- - - ,'fit' M - dubs cibsd aid •rn to before me A Tie 1, j --;--z.-:' ,4 ,r Notary Public for Oregon` ., _--_1..., _ _ _ -r.*kV* /16/8,7 '� :� ,;�: ii-Tti ,.v Wi#y Commission:Exp _ .,- 2 •_ -`° '` _._�-,t - Q. AFF/DAV1'T -- i. ix CITY � . ,,. - 3 . a a Ca P.O. BOX 2339 F °+ ,�� +,. r "I t '+•b 4 r J Lyons it 11520 SW Crown Drive # 9 King City, or.. 97223 ' I J'1t J f + Y,11 1 I ' 1...t.it'll "f U -{+,iF1 li°1 9 1� , L'},,. (:,,il.l pF�F �,., I '� '�I ,, {� 1 15.1,47,4:Aar. �.�1° r • "j - +Y�I. rr. s! (!1 1 ry!�N�l �� , - i5 � F �r +�f f{• �P »ta;'+, , ,a f 1,-• t .W!) i I . °'tTh1i'4'!•,+i,1ii' YE 0j lu t tIFi1c1?i t'1: . CHEEK, Ralph & ,Tat,.:,?.t • StrE. e3 4 Dusse]dot, 3 I West Germany :, . . '+. . . • .a0,4,, ' 01,11; t,t ;3 4�Itice. c r paste tai v , 1 • S De /7 -ct.cq' .. ,: , . , , , , , , . , . , , " , , , . :. : , • I . , , , , , : • Griffith I ; J 1470 SW Crown Drive #' 3, • Tigard, Or. 97223 e{{e j� i , M r �'ry.gy,Ywr{,�y1F Y �rl •P ,f'�'N f' �1 4iL Z�'.fir' 7 11!A '+;'i� i.\xJ'{"9 U ILrI, ;:.1 1; f �( r{ �,(yW�u.rp x� w• r \, frph.r �'.414i,n tYJI `ti+9ulY1 �`0+ '' y" 1 • N,1y{ `y IY Y.1" A J � .Y to� ��Yi i ' Y » � t .+[µ. ,. iµ1 ,.Y �. ,�� NN.E.ii'�k,t��Ni�Y'��yy((1.i�MIJM.51� r. x{Y� �µlY+,+ Il1��i�p�4 1 1 �Ma+ l��l�� l R�J pp Ell Fri 2. sen � , I 1 1510 SW C row ,r ive # 5 ; I Tigardi' ORa 9722,3 Y `f y , ,: , , , ., � J,al L +(i r fiii."N"��.Y�a`'Ida JJ � t• � { YJ. YINI,11 ! (` J9..••J , {•' It'+liYY1J+. i " :A:'P 1p;>fY. y, y� a,• yy �. r i S� �iJ,:Y Y 11(� � , Z��i�!/lY.�ttk ��,�V I. 1, I r ,� t, y�•'� {t i, :$:: FBJ 0 Y Y I ,r,! P Y i 'Ir ) - l4', _ 1• , .' YY. i � / tW Jr[ +L.�ra � reIYl� _ 4i ' i ktt{ix J i if;`�.. , � , MY�.,,,,x,,ri„,,41ti;\,µ« y A `� {l 1t'::; +' n i;Yt N Yfi a Ot''•,•ithi { M{iiFWS y/(if y+ ,•,. + xJ YY t / . ir 1 l,Y "�trA ,A i N � j • F+ S,• 1.�34iM i , atI 4 r l o ra 'At t 3t r rt' q ti� rr ii({ U,U11 c 1sti f CC ss �� I I building ?? feet is the Farm() Creek and ?? the 100 foot point ?? Terrace ?? 175 feet ?? residential ?? that he's proposing, ?? directly along with the • ( noise barriers on the same side ?? deciduous' plants there, the idea of some evergreens in ?? really ,??' again ?? and finally 6 ?? item 1, ?? hrave talked with both Keith Liden and Greg Berry about the City's requirements oh dedication. Apparently the 1984 ?? staff recommendations ?? the property ?? we don't really have a problem can ?? today. To make ?? however there's been another piece of property ?? rear of the property ?? where Puget is ?? proposing to use ?? and 45 percent ?? property from the 7? natural state ' is the ?? river meanders closer to ?? coming past the point ??I current the river ;7? b e on ?7 when the company has ?7 created a flood plain ?? some flood '. plain land by commercial and industrial development ?? specific area such at ' I the 74 ?? be an ?? to ?? talked. to Greg ?? one piece of property ?? determine if there is development potential and if ?? the City in straightening out the stream, Greg ?? approval to a ?? agencies involved ?? so 1 don't have any definitive, answers ?? with us ?? think that the City's ?? courage a private property owner in an industrial area to ?? • C m Jeff Lave a r, president of Puget Corporation 7? sta y with the ?? the way ' ( the creek does meander and whore we are talking about future possibility ?? we would 'want to do that and participate ih that, assuming that the as 8111 said the wetlands could be moved also ?I' to have some more usable land for the future. The area that we're talking' about st;f"aigteni ng it out has already been created as a„ spillway ?? wetlands to 'expedite the ?? through that area ?? t and � rn not familiar a.ar wa.f.h all ?? 'legal Mu through to do that u ar hurdles ?? went' throe ?? what it would mean eventually ?? deepening the spillway that has already been created and make that the ?7 ranno Creek, ?? current co urse ?? other comment' in regard to the , corporate citizen on that site since 1969 ?? resident of ?? thou jh our name tends to contuse people that we're ?? are actually ?7 last year been awarded ?? Commerce ?? companies 7? the number of people that we've hie'ed in ?? past year we have ?? on a list honorable mention for the jobs ?? ha �� second year in a row `7"? again ?"?' and ; � � having watched the history of this area over a long period of time and made an ' aggressive effort to 'provide jobs and to grow the status of that company to a world 7?' company status 7? 'I've noticed that the 'flood plain issue is a moving I 1Y ?? in the area but 7? i964 '7? and at that time there was discussion about 7? ( rules got changed 77 became somewhere else and. allowed us to build '?7 built 8L8 —O2/$D R 88-12 PAGE 2 1 1 th^ 1 9 . , � � tf•f1`1 r ry -t. ,� r • � i fi ' 1.wr+ w.e.a i x n' +''' b om... '`,p i,"''''''''.,'''''',7.," �f s i r� Mt '' I AMry.x.!,...{'r 'N,�11LL rx ., 1 ITS !o ' r ( - a, .r''. .�"I'.rr :� ,-,n yr pr ,. .n.x xT nM." i w ,,M,k j,�r,�.u+.,a,! " �' h ,.t nW"°1, (:i k'I !�'•1 r 1: \ M x • w aa 1,v� • y , I' ,' , � ...'=',',;' 1 1\ ' r ,; ..w� ; 1 n .l' , 'TI AR � R,'97223 I I !h��wN,,p ahi^', xtIk t I x 1 h", � I Springer :r 11490 SST Corwn Drive # 4 ! A Tigard, t, 0 r. 97223 r 1' ' 722 r 1 I 3 I y ir ' r ' I, 'rki9r Y�'•M'•r q h I J rf Y I ,L, ! r I -,11: +Rjnl I:f1;,, f ',a III ?Y, ,'; ',,'1 r ,.� ; u , ..•, 7.. 7 ., «' i�r a fllt� ri d" �, • I {; 1 i I I I„ I � y'1 if.",11�F I>�, I.,,1,,.',. 'hl'I ry' 1 1' r ei r I ,w,j ',M p t Y 1 -j y 14;;, 1 \\ ,l r,. +wr ri' r• ,+Y ty i . �r 3, `10 9 , '1M 1ilXl ,P 1 '7 r A l�i4•I f' y r�t II l'iiii �, t 1 . � '4 . r 7 'k s r 1,,,.4:,, I t i �k F1 A:v ' ., .1 '',,:i.I j } +c"',. I.$a`';,'..IkIJ'g ;9i�Qlr` l9 • v: Pfaedneri f. 11550 SW 'Crown Drive # 4 ; - ire Tigard,', 4r. 97223 r i r I I ,11 1 r 1 r'. fi r lllrM' 41 1:'r1, �s)I :'1,,....0.,,,, :(1 41 .„.'i 1. t.04it'n y I ,i ,,I,..(,41„! h k' , ' �+rirr 11 j .R t"f,t +l,"i{114d° .i D ,t 1f,;, e\ 1 I . 1 I 1 r 1 r r 4 J 1 t, lI 1 I ' - 1 .i,,. «.. 4 v. ,..�,..•., .�r i„ r. r.�. • „v,..,.,,,,. • x -r,. 1 • „Iv.'Yi r f, u 4: !, u 5 1✓,ffrJJJf r"" p /i Mi ': (: ( TRANSCRIP"I SL 88•--02/SDR 88-02 PUCET CORPORATION , (" J•une 8, 1988 and July 6, 1988 • I Deth Masten I I . This �� June 8, � S8 a� 7:00 p.m. We're in the Tigard a rd C�� Hal l, Town Hall Room, this is the time set for the regular agenda for the Hearings Officer, My name is Beth Mason, I'm the Hea rings Officer for the City. At my left is Keith Liden, he's the planning staff representative. We have or item on the agenda tonight, that's and 88-02, request by Puget Corporation of Oregon' for p _view and a Sensitive Lands Review on propert y Site Development 'R� p y zuned o I Light Industrial. I have reviewed the s taff report t and the attachments that were provided. Do I see from the audience the only people here are the applicant and you r representative?rtative? I'm inclined to approve the staff report subject to the . conditions found in the staff report, ,unless there is something that you'd like to add or comment oh. { . // • HEARINGS OFFICER • I Okay, fine, why don't you come forward. ?? ?? I'm an attorney in Tigard, I'm working with Puget Corporation on ?? have submitted to ?? permit ?? parking facility, The recommend `ohs from staff su �" date. staff" '?? ' r through ?"? not represent a problem excebt ?? through 6 except item a, some ?? that are standard procedures for the City of Tigard ?? president of Puget Corpora ation has ?? historical irformation years ago standard that was a � ," r r, � latt�.Url ?� little bit ?? standards ?? sir Adards be maintained ?? through G do not present a problem. Item h ?? division of the northeast 'parking area to meet ?? problem ?? systems on the west side of the. building, 7? Presently there is one HVA system ?? creates some noise leve;t ' high Level of noise respect that • t? Of the 7? problem. ?? registered to the City or to Pu ge t Corporation ?? from the neighbors. Neighbors directl y com'?? an y are 7? 100 feet from the p • aL88�-02/8t)R eg—12 PA4:1� 1 i u ,iii i it r o I M/qY' 2e 19 RYAN O'BRIEN • Manning Consultant i ` ' TIGADr' 0 1134 S,E 23rd Ave. • •Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 (50:=) 648-4061 ' .. •�..+n.rw. .. ,. :L++r.....n.�=wb r. .u.may♦ — . .r 'IN O T Keith Liden, Associate Planner May 21 198E `. City of Tigard Planning Dept. P.O. Box ',23557 Tigard, Or. 97223 SUBJECT: McCulloch Site Review Keith, Attached please find 3 copies of a revised development plan for the McCulloch, Hering Homes condominiums. As you can see, we have eliminated • Some of the garages and opened the area up. An additional 1' 5 open parking spaces have been provided by developing tandem garages and open spaces under units 69 to 80 in 'building 9 in the center of the Mite. This plan can be accomplished without an exception to the Zoning Ordinance to reduce the required 15 foot set back between blank walls and walls with windows. However, we would like to request a 12 foot set back, a 20% i reduction to the 15 foot requirement, in order to have the flexabil;' ty to ' adjust set backs to fit site grading. As an example, we would like to increase the rear yard Set back of building 6 to 3O feet because of the ' excessive cut along the north property line. We are also requesting a 2 foot exception ±o the code to reduce the separation between buildings, without windows from 10 feet to 8 feet`. This separation would only apply between garages, and between garages , an the dwelling units. The separation between dwelling units would ( still be 10 feet. AS with the first requested exception, this is .r• a 200 reduction to the code requirements. , Also , attached are 14 copies of the storm drainage detention plan. Please review this information and give me a call if you have any questions. We plan Submit complete sets o f these revised plans in the next couple u p l e of days if you a gr ee with tAIc. o rthanges 1 Sincerely, w C� s -1 k /' E, _an 0tBri"en Ir l)/P . ' g, . 0111 .. , „ r. ' • ait,-,4?)yl • '•4,e I've/ (ye-Ai yt I 1 • , REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS ' 01-" IGARD TO: DATE: May 16 1984 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: WOK SDR 7-84 Site Development Review approval of an 80 unit residential development and related facilities on property ;coned R-40 (Residential, 40 t- ' � units/acre) located on the northwest corner, of Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific -• Hwy. Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 281 IOAC, lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From , . . information supplied by various departments and agencies and FF Y p g an from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be , pr:--pared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 25 , ' 19 84 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return F o re rn your comments. If you are unable to by the ,. above .date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box. 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Lidrm PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING T E ITEMS MS THAT APPLY: ,' � We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.�°' • l Ple s a a 'contact � � of our office. Please refer enclosed letter. ease er �to .the enc Written cornn1eAts: , , /44 1 r? (Are be vre-0.-e el 79-7Ci artAitio-C/ wi I/ 4,--, 27.1.0 0 , eie°4-, . ( . .... e )(--- 404, 1 A.----- ___.4 4 4 ie)--e>171479.____ __I C4 CA 4V _ i ', Y ./ r l,, ,s� Name of Person Commenting' 1 O e No. 1 ' ' ',,T, �; (KSL!pn/a356P) �, � ,r i • I I I I I REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS ., T0: t/ `"" DATE: May 16, ,1984 4 •FROM: Tigard Planning Department REI: WGK SDI 7-84 Site Development Review approval of an 80 unit residential development and related facilities on property zoned, R-40 (Residential, 40 + units/acre) located on the northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and SW' Pacific Hwy. Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S 1. IOAC, lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From • information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and, recomrvendation will be , prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. • If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by . MaY 25 , 19 8.4 . You may use the space provided below or attach a'I separate letter to return your comments. If ou are unable to res.ond by _the above dates please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your. comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 1 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone. 639-4171. . STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden ' PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. .�r. 1, 0 Please refer to the enclosed letter. M �d Witcomments ,.► l r /°.,7: 'd ,` - ✓/ , , #e"- 1i / r r 4 , ..._, izie__,_:._', ,....,,./ :,-5 ' ' -.'" ' d/Are'll eio' :: - ..?....re ,2,0,..4,-, ,..._, V_..-- ,1,V -1 ' '' / - rt"'Air "r-'''').- ,";,;;E:f" ," z"------. .-4"*-1.. '----"-_-- ■41 **1'7 '''-''',.41 • e - i f.,..,{-, 1/7, ,...5. A,..- dize.2b4..../- , -E.1.222 ' ",;12,_ieg,„_i_224,:it,P-4_,,,,,,,Z024 .4.:, - < -- 7 . , 64 -1 - , 4 i ' ei ,,e y 0„ � ,�"'' � . ;,', . Si 'Pee' ( i /i i ,17 ' 6P , P`"li l e) � � � ��I� �� ANart1 'o Per on Gommer ng a Phone No. ” ,. -,'` 40"G) l K S L a pr 0 5 6 p �, �1 I 1 ',, ,4,,,k( ,ji ' , G, , <1'„.• '', ,, , I , 4 u P, • Amp / REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS , TO: / --- DATE: May 16, 1984 FROM: Tigard Plannin', DepartmenC . 1tE. WGK. SDP. 7-84 Site Development Review approval of an 80 unit residential • development and related facilities) on property zoned R-40 (Residential, 40 + units/acre) located on the northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific r Hwy. Tigard (Wash Co. Tax Map 2S1 1OAC, lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and appl ant's statement for your review. From • information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to, our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Ma __._�_ 25 , 19 84 You ;may use the space provided below or attach a' separate letter to return your comments. . you are. unable to respocj11 by the above date,.�..�.,........._,. p lease phone the staff contact noted below with your comment s and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any ' questions regarding this matter, contact . the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639.4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT. APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer Co' the enclosed letter. Written cornxnents t • rltY 1•�ryr��,wyr'rnll•i `- / ` .�� "•�.. T .. r wsMn.wY.rrw M#wi+'Y/v "'�'MIIIIIII�Ir trwil �' • Name o f Person ��T ��nt Ong r , Phone 'No. ' (K8Lspmj0356P) +I • �.d L • a REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS TO: _ I 'Ad DATE: May 16, 1984 FROM: Tigard P -n ing Departure t RE: W GK SDR 7-84 Site Development 'Review approval of an 80 unit residentia ., development and related facilities on property°zoned R-40 (Residential, 40 + I units/acre) located on the northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 IOAC, lot 1000) ' Attached is the Site Plan and applicant s statement for your review. `' From pP information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other , information available to our staff', a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to '`comment on this application, we need your comments by May 25 19 84 You may use the space provided below or attach a ' separate letter to return your comments. I-you are unable to respond by the , above date, p1e ase phone e the staff contact noted below with your comments and , confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any i questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. • Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223, Phone: 639-4171. 0. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden� ^ . PLEASE CHECK ,THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: we have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. • Written comments. • � I it Name',of Person' Commenting: �� '� C,Ijj4ILIL. Phone Igo�' , (KSL:pm/0356P) • . • . ' .. ,'' ., ..,, . .. , . ..' .... . .'. . " .:, .',: :.,, ' ,. , ,: , . ,, ,. ' . ' ., 1 . I . .',, Ait '612:4, . ;�./ 44-v �' , ,e 4 1 i . . „ '4,,,,,/eth.,....1.',',.', 'cie-ifiv . 00?,f.,,e7),."e?"24 ,,,,.6, '''-'7477' ..,27'' 44 , ''• 6,04,1-10e /e.--.,.. ..-..-1" . ., if,' . ... 1 -a''' .5 e/ ,,/. .. . , .. . ' - , '"'ff ' 7� e�'� ' '''./: e' 7-1-2':17"1" 4.94ce' ... ' - . . . . i. 1 , " .., ,. 1„..,1 . . , 1 . 1 , . 4.. ' ' ' ' ' 17 ' : ';44 ' ' ' l''' r� h -8,,,:mg.‘, , ,„. .,. ' ' ,' :i' ' '' ' ,4':ef t e,'' :;'ilh e 1',7617aH e' ap,' '' ' ''5''''..rp''''/I.40,-''e. '' ' , ,,',-::1'.4f-i.'' df,.",7",-.''' i'''1 1‘'', IH 4' i e 7 ' '':' ' '' '' ''" ' '4 ' ' , J 1� f) NY r ..' . ..'.,'.',,' ••',, '... „ '...57,1eci''''''.1e-i--.-' .. /iiie'''' ' .if,",- ',,,,‘'' ./- 4,'''' ' '/.,k• .. :0,/,,,r,7',..•.1 .-„,V1:',/,' ,05240 1-,07-7':'' ' 74-i.• .'5.:',4„.. 0,.!"."; '• :'.,'' ''.'•':.. ''.'' , ''. .' ' --17-/ '9#/* ' '-';''gii/' '''' I . ' ' ' ''' ;'-',./1 '' ' '' .' . '''.4' '' -1I''' ' ' '''H.,4 ' 71--"*:' ' '',0'72'' ''' ' •„ . .._ H.," . 4e)11 . .„, . .. ,,,,,,He,' „ ,,,,, ' iwee ,, etfri '• ,i#,---.' ' . t(e .var):.,„‹, e,, /44,01 a,-,•: ..' ,,,H . , • 1 ' n ,• ' - ',�1 £:9 r.� ,�"' .,�' ! -,+tea' 1 , , 1 . . 1 ... . , i . .:,. ., ..9. . , . . ,,a2,e' 6:5-5,, ...tzlvtoo."'„,,44,,,,,,,, .,,,,,,,?—,,,,,,,„,' . .. .v ....,.., 3,, ,,, , ii,,,,,,,e,,,,,,F, . ,. , , ' - ... (',.----"' ' ye,1,-------- . . ., , , . , . , , :„, - . . ,: i ,ee- , -,4,, • . . ..-....,22:), . : . , ., . ,. .. : .. • ..- . . , ,„,, .,.„,. „. ..., , ,. :,.. ., , ., - :..„. 1,.. .'....'.,,.,„,':, ' , , ' 1 . . : . ,. . • , „L. . .. ...... , : , . , . .. , , , , to 6* . . : ,, .. . . . , ., • , :. ' H.. : - ' i � , _...,,, _./. ,, , ,,. . . , //e.H ,.' ., , . , „ '. r .1 ., . .. .„ .,... . .,, 1 �: I ' 1'id (' d 10 0��,[]' . ' ,,� %"` , ,?' '.` �'' ', 4 0 •/j/ ' i ' . ' ' ,,,,;; '.'40.'11 , iryz/e4,10.er.4, 47. ii",.,,,,,is-.. „ ,,:,,,,,;4,...;;;-:,,.,'.:.--e•.,;. , ,.,,,,..,,q::,‘„-,..,i,:.H..,.::,-,. ,,,:l .,,,,,,,,...,,,.,...• . ., , , . , , J. , , . Pa ry y Jy i e5r°,^'',�` ,a a ! .,'"a .? ,v+44. K.a q, yy 0 .., , :. ,:-. :.. W .. .Cle P ra� ,!;��:i i��`'7:ax- .A r u. .,i�ii'� .N'r��i, ',�1r • :,a L. 1 ta M1,•,.4 y.'4�r �.. +� 4 '+' �i!.G�f�i.a C•"G 'f' 0 Y / , • ° p4O' '; ' . . .:. p.. ..C�. 'A°4%7:. .- .. ° "'' , 9' , E. "t'' ✓ `aMyp' . ' t •' d , & 1 1 .%. ' .,.. .„------,. . ,,/..,1 .. . „. ' ' -11" l'' .'' '''." ' ' ' ' ' .' ',..0-0*,• •.',/,- ',04flal,74,7' ,re .4 7/7- e. • HH •' .'' .6 ' . .,,4".,fri 7•./4.14't .. .ce'5',; '**1 --'- '' ' ''''' '''''' '''' ' '. ''' ' ' '-. - ' : ' ' '' ' '47' ' ' ' ' ' ' ';',e'.:'ex; /,‘,d1, '' '' ' '''' ../.:1;47-,0.44e,,„4„.e///tolice,1,4,,,a,;, - ''''''' : ' 1;. • ',,r,,z,44/..5"•'•,,,,,pdi. -.. „.-•../..:, ',,,, ,' ..„." ,:.. ..., •00.„,,.. ,,,,.... ,H : , r : , • , n U i ' 1 .r. y ' 41 )P (14 rio 4 1 11P4.151. 4Port:;• liotfrti'or 400 115r, iftries,ik3 I.A A9504 1$1.1w1.411: 4.0 17. ovtrik).4frr'e, A e ' L)) 1 ' ', + !! t ` r,b;"" • 4 w. t OCA4. 11"kepAigs:) 5 i k ll Ilk �rW. M+F !� 11 it 11 ,i1/7 ‘y • • j. i i REQ ESTS FOR COMMENTS. 0( ' DATE: May 16, 1984 .,: a' TO: y w I , • i, FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: WGK SDR 7-84 Site Development Review approval of an 10 unit residential development and related facilities on property zoned R-41 (Residential, 40 + units/acre) located on the northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 251 10AC, lot 1000) I I I Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other to our staff a report and recommendation will be tin available report fo ma o a.n r staff, prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 25 19 841' You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are u n ble Co resaond fey the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and i confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any ,, questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department,' P.O.O O. Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. ;., STAFF CONTACT: Keith Lid en PLEASE .CHECK THE FOLLOWING WxNG ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. ). , II I Please contact � � of our office. Please refer to the enclose d letter. Written comments: I . • ', � y—urwrww�.vr I irw,.r.w+ter ' "- MIME FwYlf.- Name of Person Commenting Phone No • II ( SLtpm/0356P) s ( I � I • NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL 'APPLICATIONS 1. NPO N°. CPO No 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS lor k„ Buildin Ins ector &�? Engineering-Randy * 6 Engineering-Frank/John 4//'' Parks and Recreation • • 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Tualatin R.F.P.D. Metzger W.D. Washington :Co. F.D. No. 1 School Dist. No. 48 (Beaverton) Tigard WILL School Dist. No. 23J (Tigard) 4. AFFECTED 'R.IS ICTI IBS .fir 0 0-4 Pr Gity C yyyPp ��y�lj (`1` 1 Wash.Co. Land Use & Trans.Dept. planning Commission M�. Boundary Commission Planning Department _ METRO .54'0 05 41/6, , 5, STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOGAMI Engineer D ivision of Lands ; i a Board of Health Commerce Dept. M.H. Park Highway Div. - Terry Flnk Fish & Wildlife 1 Parks & Recrea. Div. (ODOT) LCDC Subdivision SuperVisor PUC Dept. of Energy. Fire Marshall Dept. of Enwiron. Quality Other, 5. ED F ERAL AGENCIES .�.. Corps �� Engineers in s � � Other C eet Post Office 7. SPECIAL AGENCIES General Telephone Portland General Electric Pacific Northwest, sell Other Northwest Natural Gas 8. REQUESTS krOR COMMENT SENT (iSL:pm/03 s6P) a: • ra ( PEBANCPOFT & ASSCCIATES ! .` ry • I N C O R P O R A T E D CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS&PLANNERS 140 N.E.THIRD AVENUE HILLSBORO,OREGON 97123 May 11, 1984 • 503/648-4101 STORM DRAINAGE STUDY For WELLINGTON ESTATES An 80 Unit Condominium Development Developer: McCulloch Hering Homes Tax Lot 1000, Map 2S1-10A The proposal is to construct an 80 Unit Condominium project on a 4.25 acre site lo- cated at the Northwest corner of the intersection of S.W. Beef Bend Road and Pacific Highway. EXISTING CONDITION The site is part of a 74.2 acre drainage basin which discharges through an 18"concrete • culvert pipe (S = 0.0156) under S.W. Beef Bend Road. The basin is only sparsely devel- oped with single family houses and a restaurant. The basin has an average slope of 12%. The capacity of the existing culvert is about 14 cu. ft./ sec. operating with no head- . ' , water or about 18 cu. ft./ sec. if operating with the full 2.8 feet of headwater height ' available. Assuming a i&_tEI frequencj)d,esign storm, the demand of existing developcnv nt on the culvert is computed as follows: Area = 74.2 Acres Runoff Coefficient = 0.3 Most distant Point = 3,300 ft. Time of Concentration = 90 minutes Rainfall Intensity = 0.70 in./hr. ' Quantity = (0.03) (0.70) (74.2) = 15.6 cu. ft./sec. Obvi ously the existing culvert ip s operating at full capacity for 25 year frequency storm and there ii no excess cap acity to suppo rt development n the drainage bas i n. Dom-STREAM CQNDITION S . . .. •. . On the South side of S.W.g Beef b�nd Road the 18" culvert e.�.t di�c harge.. s into a roadside id s ditch wh ich flows to Pacific Highway and then Southerly aloil g the West edge o f Pacific fi c Highway to an 18 i corrugated metal culvert of unknown length. This second culvert serves a some wh at greater drainage area �n� obvou sly will not handle a 25 year freque nc y • i t orrti, ! i n ° ` J '09 yNt K This down-stream area is King City. I did not take any measurements nor make any computations regarding the King City drainage system. This system consists of an extensive underground pipe network supporting an intensive development. Apparently, ' when this system was installed no consideration was given, for the development of up- stream properties. I received a copy of a letter between King City and the City of Tigard wherein King City is expressing concern regarding the capacit,:y of their storm drainage system. This concern appears warranted. • SOhUTIONSI To allow development of the site as proposed without exceeding the drainage capacities of down-stream improvements there are two possible solutions. The first being to replace the down-stream improvements with adequate sized culverts. To illustrate, the desirable, size culvert under S.W. Beef Bend Road is computed as . follows: Area = X4.2' Acres Runoff Coefficient a 0.5V o 0.70 h Rainfall].a l ntena Intensity i 0.7 y Quantity = (0.5) (0.70) `742) = 26.0 c.f.s. At S = 0.0156 and with no headwater the 18" pipe woul d need to be replaced by a 24 " • . , concrete culvert or it could be supplemented by another 18" concrete culvert. . � All of the pipeline through King City and probably beyond would h ave to be similarly • replaced or supplemented. This solution is not financially feasible for the developers and because there are four political jurisdictions involved, might be impossible to coordinate. The �fptl ti solution the ro osed development to xhe second, oten is p p p storm water a uti,o ity to detain waters include a st n for year frequency the Beef Bend Road culvert reaches capacity,iy 25 n c the ters contributed by the development during '' y q y storim at the time e S.W.S�W. B The . volume needed to be detained is as follows: Area = 4.x5 aere (t Existing Runa f C o e f f i c i e n t Proposed Runoff Coefficient 0.6 Rainfall Intensity . 0.70 in./hr. f' i Quantity = (0.60.3) (0.70) (4.25) a 0:89 c .f t.!'sec. Cu.Ft. 60 Sec. Detention Volume (0.89 sec.) ( �y 90 Min. 4 806 cu.ft. • t "S detention ',could be .. . - e accomplished in one or more locations on the s ite and could be either above or under ground. for those readers unfamiliar rwith detention systems, they are merely r.es tv oir v aeirs designed so that they remain empty at all times except during periods of heayy water flows I • • 1 To contain this volume, the equivalent of a pond measuring 40 ft, by 40 ft. by 3 ft. deep would be needed. If underground detention is used by the developers, the equivalent of 382 Lineal feet of 4 ft diameter pipe would be needed. • RECOMMENDATION My first preference is always to improve down-stream conditions and to channel the free flow of storm water to natural areas, but because of the extensive improvements down-stream this does not appear feasible. Therefore to avoid the proposed projects contributing to possible problems down- stream, I recommend that the construction plans for the development incorporate a storm water detention system with a capacity of at least 4,800 cubic feet and ;a re- lease rate of 0.89 cu. fit„/sec. (The release rate represents the drainage from the property during the design storm prior to development). 4s) 4.4 441 45146 OREGON ve, age at,r 41.45 rzt/ � ."7-51'e'll 'I ,/fit ,qpl- " 6,1v ' 411/! •, :' 40,109,02P - d i/o% "'" ' i t I a • 11 iiii museimo,, limps. . ,i s ...woo , 'agoolt, , ..... ,. _ II w ta...1 L. ....---- • //' \ , i a, . , 4., % ha° • i ii is r . II I 0•••••• sot ,...., •1•••••••igiar4 lip Ilrim 0 11111) 1r 1 op ilk ..,,,, op 7 t , i ,.. e,,, -'00 pit2/00,af , 74,2•04,7i)bii / 1...\--....s,4„.„......... ..... , ....0, or\ tit/14 ./.4.,0 0.. , : .......,.;. , ,„7...., .. A..., .„,,..., .... ,. ,.. ; , .. . ;‘.44 ) ,4,..." ,,,t. . . _ - _ _ _ .. . _ • . . . . , , - • • , . . - ... A. - - ' -. r'' -'.' E 'I. I ti.. ' • - .. ‘, .!4:•.., '-.%.1-• :-- .-, '.'_.": ;;; 1,,,..; .* ,. --: ,, ...,...•.••,,,*- ...,.; p:-. .t.._ :1, 4;1,4 •' • *.. if . : - - Pi= . .e .1>.:t■.. .,..-ir. It .M. 4.. 1 - - - - 0 . .. . , '''' 141.iiii lishb 1‘ ' .N. "X'- - .. 411 ' . _ .• r • . _ 1 „I OM . . 41111111 C) , • . . _ 111111h-‘,.. .s . • . .-- • . 1 r . . .. 1 e . Oa - - . . . . , . - . , I ii • , -- : of:Zk . a- c ' - 014 . ( i r.v . Mil=GIs lin Ns sip sr iis me Mb. , me me • . 116 -IP - • - : . . . - _ _ • sitiltait . • • .. .414,11;„ \\,.. ft ' - - - - - 41414 ' 11111-64:4401,,, , . 1 at ' - N \P 4IP -•■.z ,.._ _ ' I . '''-%44 NI:''.. .""'....--=--:1,-- , _. _ . .-, . 4 . -....4_ , t_ Iii e ' - 41 .--41',„44.44,1r.......11114rs.......iipAr--'-----.3 11r 11 _ e, .. . .. . _ . .. 1 ‘, , .,I ': . . "•- . . .All , \ , • . . , -. -•.: .....0 . IIII- . . - - - . --- • _ . . _- • • ' .: ' n ._,_ - . ,. .-, , . . .1. - .1' .. : . . • . - • 4' ' ft■-- ' ■....._. 1. . 1 .- . •.t." .■ . . •. - A • ' a., G + ..:w. gib. I.. .. r F .�^,� c. '4�I� t f '�'gYa �' �' �'p, i9 k r �".. tri',,r`a'n\l r;,„„ ' y ' /,....,.. .)....r.., 'SKY r UZ,...PlaVo ,L R.1, 1 4�`,"'�44 h , , „ , 1 GENERAL APPLICATION APPLICATION FORM CASE No. 5ole 7-49- 7Z ' CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 RECEIPT No. 1 , Tigard, Oregon 97223 -- (503)639-4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY: J PROPERTY ADDRESS ( -1V ,.9-._. .•--" r, ;;,.6.10 ,,.A A ► Associated Cases: - LEGAL DESCRIPTION ITA< (.,Q`�' i 4,.mw 2,. 1-....100..c INTERNAL PROCESSING: ' � � Accepted. for Pre-App. : SITE SIZE 44-,53 � •-1C _.. PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* �h _, i! - � `� �' By: ADDRESS O 3_ °A v " ,, S '_Q_-' PHONE 6 'S Pre-App. : CITY _ - - 0 ZtP CA77 1 t Ca . APPLICANT* 'P, . ;1ii►. '..'(CA.,,O 40 ;ail_ (at: *. R A lit Date & Time: ......r C Ne- ADDRESS \7 '�AC.,. t L C- LA PHONE 4r �!7 . �" Accepl, pr/De7is ion CITY • "' ZIP 1 k *Where the owner and the applicant are different people , the Y. applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in Hearn 1.4/Da • '„ possession with written authorization from the owner or an � 96,. agents of the owner with written authorization. The written Hearing Reset To: . au thorization must be submitt ed with this application. on• 2. IS ATTACHED Decision: filed & mailed REQUIRED LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION DES NO., ` . 3. THIS APPLICATION INVOLV ES THE FOLLO WING• APP. Accepted ed for Appeal: FEE FILED PAID Comprehensive Plan Amendment from to a B:ry ,... , quasi-'J odic ial legislative - Date of Hearing: Zone Change from to quasi-judicial legislative DESCRIPTION: o Planned Unit Development ---"— Comp. Plan Designation: concept plan detailed plan Subdivision 0 No. Major Partition ' ... Minor Partition r -- — Zon :n Dis ict Design Review r Conditional Use -" Zoning Map No. i _ _ Variance to Zoning Ordinance .....ctolf it> Ad 1.4.,,, /0470(Title 18) Quarter Secti on N o. Variance iv a s i o n 0 (Title 17) STAFF NOTES: Sensitive Land Pernik : Floodplains Dra inageways p Slopes � � � _ • Stee Slo e Other a . 41/0 TOTAL: ' ( ., . I 0 . C A `'A w.a.• x.•4.0 4,,,1/4 i5►.ii.•.4 4.i.Li.'+.--.."C7'¢Y„'-x-t-.b a ,�,,,L .. ( 'i, :.t.41,• .tea_._ M ......_,. CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW, Ash, PO' Box 23397.- . . , Tigard., Oregon, 97223 - (503)639-4171 SUPPLEMENTAL. INFORMATION (TO BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT FOR STAFF USE ONLY Notice of Response 4. DISTRICTS �rt� ��,, �Na Ye s SCHOOL DISTRICT t ! 6I .. ../f �.,. *;. ' WATER DISTRICT G '-= La l ' _— ag.M ` �.._. .. ,.�.._._.. ; FIRE DISTRICT. r � ± ' , PARK DISTRICT . UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY - Sewer Available: YES 1.: NO M, ' , . . OTHER 5. ' PUBLIC UTILITIES . ELECTRICITY ,P5F__ ' : : ' : ' , ., , . NATURAL GAS . ' TELEPHONES:. �.. _ . • OTHER PUBLIC TRANSIT (TRI $E,T) � ' NEAREST BUS ROUTE AND STOP w_.. ' - ' 1 , . , . , ,. : 1 7. OTHER INTERESTED.AGENCIES (SPECIFY) - , 6 8. GHAiA CTER DE TIDE AREA EXISTING L AND USE PL AN DE SIGNA TIO N ZONE ,_. V �t E E NORTH' VACA N 6 s , __,._LiP',3) s 4:(71,,N-,, ', ' AM/DPW/. 1. .+LEA 11:EAST R- s ..... . ... .. WEST, '', A......;,s' ' . , „ , „ , . , „ , , , , ,. ,, , , , . . , " , , . . , , , , ., , . , , , i. , . , , . , , „ , , , , , , , .„ , , . , , , , . , ." , : ., , . , „ . . .„ ,„ , , , : , .. . ,,, „ . . , , , . , „ , , , , , 1 , , , , „ , " , , „ , , „ , 1 , J , , , . , , , , , , , , , " . , , , . , , , „ , _ , . , , , „ . _ , ,, . ,, , ,J ,, . , , :, , .. Y N ,v....-. ... 1 r . , 111 8 • • • GENERAL APPLICATION FORT PtA,E 3 .• CASE No. .. CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 'Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)639-4 171 :1• 9. CHANGES IN THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA WHICH AFFECT THIS APPLICATION. Please Discuss: 5o /Mc-0 PEsid,‘447-7,4 (2)01,4 7-thE )09-14.7,04e) Hie etJ4:0 1c/2-- iTA-0-: 7 c /5- / i t 4- V , L -0/4/A dot_ 4WD &cry 0 cam' ' • 10. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE Lot Area (acres, square feet) 11. EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE SITE Square Distance. From Property'Line Use Feet North South East West • 4 4, at -"AI, ------- � r I NATURAL CONDITIONS 12. Percent: Slope: t ' Q 566, o ' t� r r 13 Vegetation Types: Average iane ter Percent Of Each 39/ Avera. e D Yes N o Size O f Trees •.,., Ices Per Size Trees: 20 30`t Brush" Grass: 14. Fioodplains How much the site is in floodp 15. Water Courses V What type? Droppings � 16. Rock 'Outc 17. Other: 18 Proposed DeMelo meat, Please briefly ly describe the proposed deve lop 80 01■1(1— Pc-111,4 tAta-r-O_c_atli • Y : r•wl r,._, i, _ ,',i ail , r „ ',i r v i ♦1, •,v.,,I.+u.i. ., u•• .•v,l.. I nr,v,• ., v ' yr ru.or... „..., .,v,..,.,, .....+.v ...' . v...•......... .+..ye.v... ....nn....+.-...-+ o A c GENERAL APPLICATION FORM Pk`ur, 4 ww CASE No. CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)639-4171 • 19. The following is 0, is not Ei required.* 20. Overa11 Site Development i 6/No5 Waif 6/N F Residential Commercial Industrial O.en S•ace Other Roads Total No. of acres . y , ,1 or square `l41, Z' . '1" r ° '7/ e-> ( ,.,, F °" /6g� Os-� feet per use .tigirS''M C12. 480 5a—F t. r • Percent of Tarig-C-'''', /i ei c 5A a site 1 7 0 ioo3/4). eovera•,e G r C Use and Characteristics 21. Type of Res�.dential s # of Bedrooms/Unit . Type of Use // of t?nits MISUIPII 3 4 Pro.osed Density ___ , " dr i 7 ION i , 5 cirrs i 2E IIIIIIIII • MIMI 22. Where applicable , please explain how the open space, common areas and recreational facilities will be maintained. P ( N(c AND a.6�C-I14 i UT ("0‘U' Jr A( e) M -- Tft op-TI- cry (.� --fN -'.t12'--- OF 4 S grE, k' ., na ,yf 7-,..72-A-7 5/c7 I 63 ,0_,,Fes,,,. +' „'F.:.. 0 i...++c poo Aio mmAimwro r-E,-7/ AL 4641c, 06A-Yola2-S /,15-'g'OciRcri,;6041/4-4/- i' 23. If the project is to be completed in phases , please describe each phase. of the project. ,4a o - pi9/e-icrA/K-- /i%ar' ' Li 77 6 177 to /NO ,:Di(416-- Ai t - - o '7 P/V 1 p/4/4),5,, , rmE 6,r' ✓/t, e/ofe,6, SC c'r ',577 ` "c tt M 6/2(0 q jos- oi --. /2_ ro / 6- cif/v/7-s- /9-LS S, ,) 4,,E-a Please subtit the following with. this application: <, : g 1. Written General , number as re...ttired by Planning Department. eral Narrative nitnt q 2. Proof of Ownership pp' . r 3. Le�:ter of authorization if a l�.ca�,nt- �.s tot awi�e 4. Tax Map this, se do y � to be coui'leted staff' will i.dentif for You, whether c n �.s � , • GENERAL, APPLICATION FORM P5 C �� ,. CASE No CITY OF .TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)639-4171 THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE, AS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT, SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF EACH HEARING. (e.g.` 'AttOrney, Surveyor, Engineer) Staff Notice Notice Re ort Decision of Review Street 0 (111.116..1( 1 it 6 Cit- 6.1 eATOU, Name ea. .h a :I►" Gila.— Street 3 w s •► Zip ...27(2,„ ' Street State Zip Name Street Ciler State Zip APPLICANT OWNER 1 . ^�~ • • l4 RYAN BRIEN Planning Consultant i 1134 S,E, 23rd Ave, • Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 • (503) 648-4061 May 9, 1984 . Application for Site Review to the Tigard Planning Commission for 80 Condominium ' Units. • Applicant: McCulloch - Herring Homes Property Owner: WGK Development Corporation in Tax Lot 1000, Map 2S1.10AC 4.33.acres Located at the Northwest corner of Pacific Highway and Beef Bend Road. INTRODUCTION • ° This development contains 2 story condominium units with about 1000 square feet of living area per unit, Each unit has 2 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms and an 8' by 8' covered patio. All of the living area for each unit is on one level. There are a total of 123 parking spaces or 1 .53 per unit; 80 are in detached garages and 43 are uncovered. This development is intended to be sold and marketed as no frills, moderate priced units in the $40,000 price range. The purchasers are intended to be elderly, retired couples, singles, middle aged couples with children, and young' • couples without children.' Children will be allowed in this development, but very few are expected. Site construction is anticipated in the middle of August' and construction of the first few units is proposed in September. 1984.. All site work and utilities will occur in one phase. The units will be acted in 3 to 4 phases, depending on sales. TOPOGRAPHY AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS The slope of the site ranges from 7% to 20%. The elevation ranges from 240 feet , at the southeast corner to 310 northwest corner. The northwest' the co feet at the r corn . A cornea 11 be lef t undeveloped because o f steep a n the ee o Th e site contains slope variety, but no hazards that, would cause excessiv soil I erosion or slides is located on the site. The soils on the site are as follows., . ' Soil 11D - Cornelius an d K ilton Silt Loa m - 12% to 20% slope - The northwesterly 100 feet of the property a moderately well drained soil on old mitred alluvium on uplands. The fragipan is 20 inches thick, 38inches ,b ,.low the aUrface. Run off is n is moderate. This soil is severe for roads and dwellings because the AASHTO standard is A-4. The high water °. g of te.fall. and ° um e� rtoaso i11e �: xs so �, p poor for road table is 2.5 to 4.0 feet. Bedrock is over 60 inches. Soil 7C -• Cascade Silt Loam = 7 % to 12% slope -- The northwesterly half of the mums., K h r„ V Page 2 r. McCulloch Herring Application for. Site Review . property a poorly drained soil on old mixed alluvium on ,uplands. The` fragipah Is 23 inches thick and 27 inches below the surface. Run off is medium and erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is moderate for roads and severe for dwelling ' • because of slope, wetness and low strength. It is fair for road fill and the AASHTO standard is A-4. The high water table is 1 .5 to 2.5 feet and bedrock is� over ., 60". „ Soil 7B - Cascade Silt Loam - 3% to 7% slope - The southeasterly half of the property. This soil is the same as soil 7C except the slope is less. ELEVATIONS AND LIGHTING The roof will be composition and the siding will be textured masonite that has the appearance of rustic cedar. The rear elevations will be broken up with patios separated from adjacent units by wing walls on one side and landscaping on the other side. The front elevations will have a stair step effect because of the detached garages. This design will provide a private area between the garages and the units. The units will be stair stepped in both the northerly and easterly direction. Lighting will be provided on the dwelling units and garages to adequately illuminate the driveways, sidewalks, and dwelling unit entrys. Also, the patios will be lighted. . All of the units will have views of the lower Tualatin River basin. LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE 1 The site will be fully landscaped with lawn, shrubs, trees, and ground cover and provided with an'automatic irrigation system.. The street and interior property . i line will be properly landscaped to provide buffers. All of the mature trees that can remain on the site after grading will be retained. These trees will be properly;` incorporated into the landscape design. The lan'dsCape and irrigation plans will be prepared by a landscape architect. Each unit will be provided with a 64 square foot covered patio and private .landscaped areas around the patios. A large common open space natural area about 16,000 square, ' feet in area is provided at the northwest corner of the site. This will contain passive landscaping, walking trails and picnic areas. Another small open space area is provided at the west end of building 9. No active recreational facilities are proposed because of topography and the lack of need for such uses. These units are a unit hat the p s do want to price. Experience at s ,pro proposed to 'be moderate p � p ,,type,�o f' hove ! i homebuyer to pay additional maintenance costs and increased sales prices of the unit in exchange for extra recreational facilities: Experience also shows ' that a smalll development like this s one does not have adequate use of recreational , facilities to justify the initial cost and upkeep. .. A ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS w All of the Zoning Ordinance Requirement to this development are attached. Requirements that relate i:s Bevel `F.. . • . Page 3 McCulloch - Herring Application for Site Review PP This development compli es with all of th ese requirements q ua ements exce t for the separation aration between the garages and the bedroom windows. A 15 foot set back is required but ' only a 14 foot set back is provided. This deviation affects buildings 1 , 2, and 9, and is caused by the Washington County requirement to dedicate an additional , 5 feet of property for future widening of Beef Bend Road. The current right-of-way is 60 feet, but the ultimate right-of-way is 70 feet. Beef Bend Road is currently a County major collector street The Planning Director end the Planning Commission has the right to grant exceptions to the code for set backs up to 20% based upon the following criteria: , of 1 . An exception which is not greater than 20°6 is proposed. or Comment: This proposed exception is only a 7% deviation from code. light,2. No adverse', effect to adjoining properties in terms o f g ht, noise levels, and fire hazard. Comment: This is an internal condition which does not affect adjoining property. ' ' There is no alternative to this exception a's the rear yards, the depth of the garages, the depth of the units, the parking spaces, are all fixed and can not be reasonably reduced without a significant impact to the design of the development. , 3. P . Safe vehicular and pedestrian access will be provided. Comment: A reduction of one foot will not have any effect on vehicular and pedestrian access. 4. A more efficient use of the site which would result. Comment: Clearly this exception will allow a more efficient use of the site. No (, " other alternatives are available. 5. The preservation of natural features have been incorporated into the site design. ' Comme topography and the trees. 'Both have been nnt The only natural feature are the o r preserved and utilized as much as possible. C 0 COVERAGE LOT C The site contai acres, or 188,615 feet. The breakdown of the uses are site contains �+:.�� '188,61 'square fee he h as follows: Garages . r. i i . • b r r o • r i i i Y • e 19,200 80, 10% I,. 92,480 sq ft 49nr 41 ' ''. .i:,• r''. i ♦ . i :•��'�M 'd Y a i�i . . Y . id'. : �:n ID' '. ` Units Drives and open parking . . .. . 31 ,469 sq. ft. .. . .• .. 17% Landscaping and open space e . 45;471 sq. ft,. 1" '" . 24% Total 188,615 q ft. 100% 7r i M i . +►'. Y & • : .� Y :. i .9 .' s e � ti'. .'i i e A, �V . • . Pa e4 9 McCulloch - Herring Application for Site Review . , Over 20% of the site is in landscaping and open space, and less than 80% of the 1 site is covered in compliance with code requirements. • UTILITIES AND SERVICES • The site served with 12" water both Frontage and Beef Bend Roads. . ' is ser d 12' afar lines' on h the ,Fronta an d ads. � ,• . An sanitary 116th the west i " � r�ist 'ct and USA have abnd'on I indicated that those' i in King � � .rani � sewer line is available 16th Avenue ��to � � City. Water D rsicate ' l'nes are adequate to . serve this proposed development. An 18" storm sewer line is available at the south " i east corner of the site. This line flows under Beef Bend Road and connects to 1 ' another 18"line which runs southerly along toe: west side of Pacific Highway. This line drains the subject property and the state Highway to the east. These lines , • ' are adequate to service the subject property provided on-site storm water detention I • is used. A storm drainage study has been completed as is attached to this report. All other public facilities and services are adequate and available to serve this . • site; • CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION j'. Attached is a letter to Keith Liden dated May 3, 1984 which sumarizes the findings of the transportation report. Also attached is 'a copy of the findings and c i' dins r conclusions P p Py' g . of the traffic report. The .report `basically states that transportation impacts are . not !a problem with this development and that signal timing should be reviewed by ODOT. At the time this report Was written, there were no specific oppositions to this development from ODOT or Washington County. . Interior circulation is a loop road 24 feet in width,. This design has been reviewed and approved by. Joe' Grulick of the Tualatin RFPD. Although only one entrance is available on beef Bend Road, it should not be problem because of this loop design. Because of sight distance problems, the proposed driveway is the only safe location. No access to the frontage Road is proposed in order to reduce impacts from left . turn movements onto Beef Bend Road and right turns onto Bull Mountain Road and through movements north of Bull Mountain Rood. CONDITIONS COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS , (i The following is a summary of the developments standards: 1 . A homeowners association will be set up to maintain all of the dwelling units, E . • ' av e' landscaping, . , garages, p eo areaS, sidewalks, utilities and recreational facilities. • 2. No parking of boats, trailers, large trucks cis or any other simular equipment Pme ht will be permitted. . . Other uses ,or facilities es tha t will not be permitted are as follows: . a, vehicle le di �ant �� t m s' el'h� m i Y a 1 . r • Page ' 5,,; McCulloch -- Hering Application of Sit eReview • • b. outdoor pets • c. TV or other antennas d. wood storage e. outdoor laundary lines • f. conducting a business, manufacturing of service that has the outward appearance of a business or which creates traffic. g. any outside storage, except for outdoor patio furniture and simular patio equipment h. signs, except one square foot name plates shall be permitted for each unit. 5. No exterior changes to the units, including color changes can occur without , approval of the homeowners se'ocaition. 6. Parking in the garages shall be required because of the limited parking on the site, rather than perr ''-ting the garages to` be used for storage or work shops. '..,., ..,...... .n,... ,',., '. .,„uv.,.,.,.':•w,.w.,........ „a ,..,,e..,,...,.. ., ...I,rn.. ..^............ . ,,.r......rw .,,..•s,. h ,,_.0..... .i,.,x .n.. i,l: .. ,,, 1 ... i .n „k,.;,. a , 4r, 4 A . :s,,), '10 / 1,0 - ter ;Nti• f.�MIM a jill 5 . , Is min - ir ' , 4 . AstAire _ i my 9 _pm • si ., �� ai M FAI woo 4 ' � � o -.r� a . • imavAir 4`. ,61 F mug 02.4° _�■■■■..r`r`lung il` ,AJ '� mg > O a� i.ww` Std WLL'IIE 0 ././A, lii�� , aMI., awl rn OAK'. - M :t STREET Mum' �.,.". , v ./ ARCE`- � eSC, �� 1. ' 9.10 I Will• no= ti." illrrz4pviiir4i a 1 + /� 7 F• -- No 4110Nillit . I ' a mi Ej 7. 5. Du,NLI liplaWilmmil NM , II Ion 11-11-.1, Irb, ildILINNLIII // II i V 111111 win r - E., . , , . r `// / - m gyp), pay lily us CT um LANE of j, ..,,,, 2 a priti r, BURDOCK , ...___ „am ,, , 3„ I..,.,...w ii„:„.014 rte r:�� .r- ,,„ t�/7. 1 . . • + s r Oil j e es ■•.-i 13... ilts—•.,•. MI'' '0 0 R Fa- •77.71. •TONI..-11 . 1 .41•M sale, .101 ..,:lii.:40:„;0:::,, 1 Off unEn . , . v El 1 itir ' Min .2., . . 4. oP`yE �`� S.W,1R 111111;TR DEa�” N4�� 1-ASV zr , hb,:-. i Far' , - 4„,,. , . „ „ Imbh . ./. . , ii„ .....misuovi a D.IN PEI° . ;.• 1:,. lie A , , ,.,4„,7- ...„,.., . ,... , .00 0 .. $ _ ...aturrav,.: . . kip t sh %gm- - , OR OA 0 * Qua -.1. \�` 4‘t.' CS? • .t.//,‘ NI i,t , y r P 7.0", lie u ' • M ...\C • , r . .•• i I . k \ f R ,, 1 , • ,, r., . . . ea 1 MS 1V11 ., 1500 1600 = 17Q0 uJ AG NAG' rno A!; r o IM 0,1•40.11[• a�: • • n p , .- -'-'�'�` ~` BOA ate 9 N�A1N •,rd+ [1 1 ,,,Kt R 0 cR •t TO.S,, .w 1100 ' ' ...soal-tatjL•L'g C!.. **. i t; , �� 1 1200 ,. fi J�y I t----,, SAY I 1300 Il4 k M Ise Of 1400 ,,.l3 Al,' L IT..1[ ,p o y r,md,..v,�11.wr+r.w"'�OA M 1M!r[ r.Q1 AG 1 §••••' 4J1/• tics L — a 1ST 1500'' 1600 -' — ' 1300 1400 0 89AC. , . 4/7Ad ky , �, `4 . I, rt' q ;per` 't 11111• . , sett �iib �! / V . : :A"t 2- 3—78 .w . ,tjel - . Fa awzima.„ ,I 4. .' 1.6“('A , . jA.4"° /0,,,""' q 0/ s k goo i X II F. ■ U •' I' T;xok r .,`w St..•11'ti� 1.011 IN•• r, • ` 45107 i j' ■ 4 + �' 1700 . n 11/x."1 k �/CN' ../. i 1 �? 1000 433 AC, ��: 1 6 b Wf Ics 10031`I Co' , 1800 ,� al ' .3PAe. sd4 , I 1 ,v 7 .ie 1900 i , 900 • .45,a ,.•� - ---�-1HEEF -9CN8—tR©AD + ,n44 •— , v - 1149) --II'f__ ._,.,,.... � ;/t•MItYtoi iicnoY Icn.11 - �• ' z000' 7 a tti' SEE' MAP �'� q1 y i r, .drAC. 2s I IOC l• ISM ' ,Q 7 40 e\ LY..... .Y•1..a, 1......N■.1 w 14e. • MrLir-p �.wF■ r:.,-...—..�.+.�—:-... -_ .._'ter"". Ali II ,ty. . , / • RYAN O'BRIEN Planning Consultant 1134 S.E. 23rd Ave,; • Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 • (503) 648-4061 REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH FOR McCULLOCH CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, TIGARD. 20 feet - Front yard set back. 20 feet - Rear yard adjacent to C-P zone. • as , 10 feet - Side yard adjacent to the C-P zone. 35 feet side and rear yard adjacent to low density zone. • 5 feet - Street dedication along Beef Be d Road; 80% of site - lot coverage for parking, patios and buildings. 20% of site - Landscaping requirement. Screening and Buffering 5' high sight obscuring fence, or hedge to grow 5°, • • high in two yearë, or earth berm with landscaping. • Y 15 feet - minimum buffer area and set back for from adjacent low density sit y property. 1 Planting material in 15'. buffer area - Trees 15 feet O:C. At planting, 10' high ous and 5' high for evergreen. Plus ,lon bushes es or ten 1 for decidious s f�.ve, 5 gaYl usher; or , • gallon bushes every 1000 square feet of area, ape area to, for ever Balance of landscape be in lawn, dust, n shrubs. Y` �In bark ,dust ivy or evergreen Parking lot to be screened from view, and a minimum of one; landscape planter every 7 parking spaces. - Minimum width for' l ante.s, 3 feet Mnmm p i curbs -urbs Required for all planters in parking lot, Page 2 ,. 25 feet Separation between building walls with windows. � I 15 feet - Separation between buildings with one blank and one windowed wall. 10 feet - Separation between buildings with blank walls. 60 feet or 4 stories - Minimum building height. I I I I Building separation If buildings are 60 feet long, then separation increases one foot for every 15 feet beyond first 50 feet oaf length. Building separation . and set backs apply to covered patios and all other projections. 8 feet Parkin g lot set back from windowed walls. I I . 5 feet - walkway separation from windowed walls. • 10 feet - Parking lot separation from living room windows.' 7 feet - Walkway separation from living room window. Street trees - 2" cal. at 4 feet. high. Under 25° high with 16' branching, then 20' 0.C. at 25' to 40' tall with 16' to 35' branching, then 30' 0.8. At over . 40' high with 35' wide branching, then 40 0.C. 1 ` Perf� ingIRequirehients - one covered parking space per unit and a total of 1 .5' parking spaces per unit' 9 feet by 18 feet Parking dimensions of stanI dard parking spaces. ,I • 8.5 feet by 15 feet - Compact parking space dimensions. 25% Maximum compact parking spaces that can be used. I I I I I I 3 feet Parking wherel stop set back, I it o , 'Cry ry*M,., Page 3 • Landscaped Parking Planters - Every 7 parking spaces. 24 feet - Minimum back up and driveway width. Handscaped parking - One for every 50 parking spaces. Lighting - Required for this development and designed to not glare on adjacent property. Private ards - To be screened from adjacent units by walls or landscaping, and a minimum of 4 feet inwidth and 48 square feet in area. To be orenited toward • the sun. L onmon en S �0 p aElCe A minimum of 200 square feet per unit. 80 onus requires • • 16,000 square feet. • S_3y;?s One square foot per unit. No requirements for a project sign. 30 feet - Minimum right angle length of clearance for sight, distance at the driveway. and street intersection. Beef Bend Road Washington County Major Collector Street with 70 feet of right- of-way, 5 foot sidewalks and 44 feet of curb to curb pavement. Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions with- - - Format required wi this application. Site review plans required -_Site plan, grading plan, landscape plan, existing and proposed utilities, properties within 100 feet of development with owners indicated on plans, and architectual and floor plans. I .. } . . • • RYAN BRIE Planning Consultant 1134 S.E. 23rd Ave. • Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 • (503) 648-4061 „ Keith L.!.den May 3 , 1984 City of Tigard Tigard City Hall • Subject: WGK Development Corporation Condominium Development Traffic Study. • • • Dear Keith, , Attached please find 2 copies of the traffic study for the above project.;t Copies have been delivered to ODOT and the individuals listed below. We plan to submit our development plans and applications to the City on Monday April 9, 1984, for the • Condominium development. The plans are almost identical to the site plan shown s page of this traffic reort. We plan to present this case to the on the last P P P P9 Tigard Planning Commission on June 5-, 1984, and hope to receive comments from all affective parties prior to the hearing so they can be included in the Planning Commission Record. More copies of this report will be available for Planning Com, mission' review. The traffic report was prepared by Bob keech, a well qualified traffic engineer. His findings, conclusions and recommendations are presented in the first section of this report. They are as follows: 1 . Significant street and intersection capacity is available in the area. 2. Left turn Movements from Beef Bend Road and Pacific Highway are less of a problem in the AM because of the 50 to 70 second cycle .between ,green lights for left turns tl There la a greater problem in the PM because of the 140 second cycle length. e len9 th. This can be corrected by reducing the cycle len gth between green lig hts for left turns. 3. Adequate a j available at proposed osed site �,'itrence off Beef • sight distance is the p p off 'Bee Bend Road. Traffic volume is not high enough to create turning morirrient conflicts. . Therefore, this access will operate at an "A" level of service. 4. both of the signalize d intersections at Pacific Highway and Beef Bend Road and bull Mountain Road operate at an "A'' level of service in the AM and PM. The Beef ( Bend 'Road and Frontage Road intersection' an A level intersection also operates at r� it of service: turning iron Road intersection o - the movements the Bull Mountain and g Ro p "" ,Al], of at urstaxn nd to e �, xnt�er cta.on erate at an "A" level of service. However, the Frontage Road north of Bull Mountain ' Road operates at a "C" level''of service for, capacity of shared lanes. 5. The onl y action s recommended are street lighting and a request that ODOT review W he signa�s an beef B en and bull Mountain� n Roa s to consi der reducing the PM left . turn cycle time. I } .v..-.+o r,..w,.v W/A.T.r R.V+ ••r.r.-4 f A..«. ..t}ir.':. -..'t .;.y..,w1:.w }, �,.: n "(^.,r• .•+..r.11- .......rW 1fk.:. Rn I ♦ n...,.. v.:S.. r 1.•. . . .. M • M • y. r , ''` McCu11ca h He ing 1.11 metes 'vc,iteec ' cox , r , r Txs `r 1' ' It..41.E i lane v►cessi ignit.icn . t,$ I tt • a • SI ' `22' (if' . 1 af�EGON • L. J OB ... ., ., . E Py 111! �� i r�'4 �� da Tr •r,. ��'�/n Ir+R+,d .fir.rli�• CONS V L J d444J TRAFFIC ENCINEElR r(... 1 r I • n µ 9. r , i r... .I r.n ...0.•.r.,...,.,.rte a rre .r n .,•.,.,.r...u.•...r.� •...,....,,•..r..... ....w.l.r u unVn x r n 4 1 h(. . 1, I F C , F• Me ulloch_He rin Home a Project , . • Traffic Impact Investigation TABLE OF CONTENTS . • I INTRODUCTION: i Ia. Objectives , Ib. Location Ic Setting Id. Proposed Development , II Findings. • - ;' I'd. Site Generated ',Traffic j IIb. Traffic Distribution , Ile. Traffic Projection lid. 'Acceas Analysis . '. IIe. Area Wide Impact ' . III. Vehicle Queue on Beef' Bend Road •. and Bull' Mt. Road. ' . III Concluaiona„ .. ' IIIa. Adequaey of Site Access. • rea Wide Im t IIIb. A p ac APPENDIX: A. i cinit 'Map A `� jp p t , • B. Site Trmffir� G a .. _I`IOZ'a ien m i ' C. Site Distribution 1 , , Site Traffic Flow E. Existing Traffic Plow F. In-Proceas :Traffic Flow Totatl traff1e IFl a 1?'11:, Capacity Analyaie-PaclEic Hig awey at Bull 1M Read ' I. Capacity ArY a l ig w-Bu l Mt . Road Frontage Road I I J. Caprc i�y ' Anel. aiaPa ciFiG Bightioay ,Tat Beef Bend Road. , Xa tapeoity AnalYaia-Beef' Bend Road d ' at i roI ntage Road d a p acti v Arslysia w Acceaa Point o n Beef Bend 1 oad M. Queue Storage on Bull Mt. Road N. ae �� g e on Beef B end Road ' I I OH Site L ut I , I , I II d , 1 . . ( : , - , 1 • o N . f • , , I.' I�cCull e , c�ch-Hering I omee Fra)eet Traffics., Impact Ynveatigetion Y. INTRODUCTION: , W Information for the following report wea obtained from Ryan • . .O'Brien, Planning' Conaultanto , ' .Washington County staff; ''' 'and , A field ' review done 1 r;Iearch'' 13th ''and 14th. 1984. I . Ia. OBJECTIVES OF 'TRAFFIC IMPACT INVESTIGATION:, The objective ' ,' . of this investigation is to .examine the impact of 'a proposed 84 ' unit residential development. Ib. LOCATION: This ' development ' is 'located south of the ;Tigard,, ', ' I ' on Beef Bend l Road, '400 ft' West' of Pacific Highway.(See appendix j, ' A)' ' , SETTING:.., Th r lopme a on Beef.L Bend' Road.' Bend ' . ' � Yc is level nt front Ben wide roadwa with no aidewalka I and no Benin Raed is a paved �� ' ( street: 'lighting. PoSted speed 'Iis 35 mph. I Beef Bend Road is a designated 'ma)or 'collector ' Washington ' County). j E , P Bull Mt. Road is located' north of the site and is connected to Beef 'Berg tag ` oad' runs pl ..' to ' c Highway.,. Bull Mtp►, Roes de wii'".�h nee sidewal I Pacific., v~1 Read by a £ron I e r first ara e i g• y d is, 24^ wi ks, and ' The .posted s�� a is 40 mph. Bull Mt. Road is I no street lighting. p p ed ra designated actor tw ra ington County). mew or loll I ic' Highway,, which �r ' Pali£ i� - i d d ' . ew lks, and�no . Pacific lane hi hwa y with no sid �,t eestrieet 'lighting payed e Highway is a designated 'principle arterial (Waahingt:on 'Count ). g y l. The dail Y traf fic flowe on theee streets ar e �as I f ollo ws 1 street AOT(1 ' Pacific Highway ' I I 26,000 ' Beef ',Bend Road 2,0,00' ll lit Road 4,000 t Eis utis I (1) Bstiaated fr,oni ixotxrl ib a f ca I � I . I The neare�t TriMat bus �ervi ce is on Pa .ific ' H igh way, whick "' .. is ti a froiti I pP�c�xin�etely 0.1 mile elte � . , x41. PROIPO OPtigNTt ultI- family tia l units. It is antici patted that it will geino, . 'Tbilisi ,si�.e Conte ns 8 • resideaa p I I >~e5 fi 0 . . . I tripi pier •day , 1 Bite access is being proposed 'at.' one point an Bee f Bend Road �, :5.0.0 'feet west of pacific Highway. III I I I ,.I , I Y d,., ....,.x ,.b.•,.at. ,.,1 ua., ' 1. . ( • • .p _ ��\\f •, V� .� tit f • ,,, • II. FINDINGS IIe.I SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC: Table A is a summary of the projected traffic generation from this site. The site is planned to contain 34 residential units. Appendix B contains a detailed calculation sheet. r. • :.: TABLE A Summary of traffic generation IN OUT TOTAL • AM 9 36 45 PM 40 I 16 56 ADT 540 • � r IIb. TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION: Traffic distritiution is based on vehicle trip tables from Metropolitan Service District. (Se appendix C) I I traffic flow (Total • projected r IIc. TRAFFIC PROJECTION: The Traffic Flow) used in this Study include, the existing, site r and entic .� by 119)3 6. generated, ipated growth I , • Appendices D,B,R,and G contain det ile of the traffic protections. ACCESS ANALYSIS: The access point l on Beef Bend Road has I adequate !hour tconflictin for with tiraf f ice� speeds. There dL,t than '; here is less 3 g oming in and of the 4 site. The sing 1e acce ss point Would provide adequate e capadity for thil proposed land us e. r 1 (See appendix L for additional details). tie. IMPACT?. Th AREA WIDE E IMPACT` The area Wide ana:ly$is included four intersactions; Pacific Highway and Bull Mt. Roed,° Bull Mt. Road F ighwa3 and end Frontage Road; P�aaci�`ic N 1', Beef Bend Road; and Beef Bend Road and Frontage oM s � summary of findings. (Worksheets are contained in appendicg 14,I 6,4 . 1i {et I ' • 'III '• I ....i.. ..r.r.r ..r .,rr.n. r.. u., r.. ....r..r„. .,..s xn.rn1., e y r .•,u..u.r... ' ', n • ... 'rf,',.yr r,u.. rr,n,-,. r...,, ... ., r .. .,•.nr. n11 n. 1 1. Y ir.lr ,uY.a s f( L . ' t ' TABLE C ' j Area Wide Analysis ' Intereectian, Type of Control Existing . Projected ' : ', 'Demand/Capacity � Demand/Cap licity Pacif ica:B,ull Ni Signal ' . • , . ' AM 736/1275(2) 779/1275(2) . PM 795/1275(2) 83611275(2) Bull, Mt&R'rontage Stop Sign n • ' ' AM 99/632' (1) '1001605 (1) ' PM 234/528 (1) 23'9/504 (1) Pacific&Beef Bend, Signal AM ; 76/1'275(2) 4,18/1275(2) ;. ' PM 721/1275,(2) 770/1275(2) Beef Bend&Frontage Stop Sign AM 11/645 (1') 11/598 (1) l pm 22/590 (1') 22/551 (1) (1) D. Level of Service is, maintained as long as ' Capacity -. Demand > 100 'v/h (2) D Level of Service is maintained as long as Demands d ' 'Ca acit p y q 11E. VEKICL,E QUEUE ON BEEF BEND ROAD AND BULL MT. ROAD: The ' f ollowiing Lable is a campariaan of. the 'eatimeted vehicle queuea ti an Beef Bend Road' and Bull Mt. Road at. Pac.if is Highway. ' TABLE D Estimated 'Vehicle Queue * •• on West approaches to Pacific Highway isting4 Appraagich E P'iajcted 1986 • • AN/PN 'A.MJPM ' 4( x Beef Bend 2 cars/2 cars 2 cars/4 care • , • \ I ' Bull Mt data/12 care cars/12 cars !' ehi. es a � .. both 'by,. the .ef" ' � , th d, the.' �raffi e t c aaigna�xl cycle time. yn ,t , �4M period tr fic de aarad c1e eu ate influa�rnced un f .� . the .signala� g ' y, °le. F econ '� a . g of 5 0 ,to,',../.6,' : llawei to, tun', r ' s .. ... ! C y is theutime. between '� are a � � n� .. �ds. Cy die.cle leing�:fi service Callas on era ' 'a�pproach-� Turin . riod _s a. ing �n . concert with, hers salon is l hi,s resin 9 the� PM� p�►'� - � e �sigr�a�9� � � rr�.��i�peacat � � � � � � �� r �� i�h►� r��:. �.��_ ,� � �c� �'ac�l.��l,c hl�:�gtiW��ey. �T��° �Its �,��ri Ha': . : seaona c cle len th. , . I A The vehicle queues on Bull Mt Road creates the potential `' ,� problem. The sight distance form the south approach of the frontage road is obscured by the vehicles queued at Pacific Highway. There is no easy solution for this situation. Moving the frontage road to the went would be costly. Some type of signalization at this intersection could possibly improve safety. The vehicle queues on Beef Bend Road will not create 'the same ' type of problem as seen on Bull Mt Road. The queue will deity , traffic turning onto the frontage road from the west and off the frontage road to the east. This delay is a direct result of the • Pacific Highway signal. In the future the traffic on Beef Bend Rood' could interfere with clearing of the intersection ' during the green phase of Beef Bend Road, at which time consideration should be given to relocating the frontage road to the west. Reduction of 'the PM period 140 second cycle length would ease , r the vehicle queue at these locations. This solution would have to be looked at very closely to insure that a proper trade of between arieral flow along Pacific and traffic safety on the ' ajacent side streets. 1n ,I ! I I I I A, � I I I I I i I 1. i , I i I I I . i i , I 1 i 1 L 4 I I I i 1 i i I 1 III. CONCLUSIONS i IIls. ADEQ',YACY OF SITE ACCESS: The site access can adequately Function in the immediate future, although the following item 1 should be considered necessary . 1. Adequate street lighting at the access on Beef Bend . ... Road. IIIE�., AREA WIDE IMPACT: All intersections within the • immedia.'.e area (study area) will have sufficient capacity without any additional improvements. , The following are traffic safety items that should be considered necessary: ' 1. Adequate street lighting at Beef Bend Road and Frontage I Road. • 2. Adequate street lighting at Bull Mt. Road and Frontage Road. 3. The traffic signal timing of the Pacific Highway system . be reviewed by the State of Oregon Highway Department to reduce the''cycle time of the signals at Bull Mt. Road and/or Beef Bend Road. ' i . M (' \ ' 4 h ,� ry 4 ~ , 'r. • , i • i ry , I i '�, .Cam.�. .�: �: , -4,.. ,, », lit . 1 1 n 1 [ 144 • l , C • I ww t. • 1 . I • m /,J �. A t l ter.,. 1 '( - 0. • 0 • • • • • i' .. .lihl '..'t# ■ u 1 r + t , b,L.‘ i G1e4 41t Sr 'v i r, c., , I. . . , I f' .. v I I r I • 5 r 1- r ? I I t, L. ', , , y)y} , I d ,ii 1 1 i 1 1 , I 1 1 c uLt..oc„.1.i 4atoc \,-\6t,t4iii F(?4;,:v.t...or , ., . • . I I 4+ , i • 1, . , Vicii,..1t, .. t. , 1, , V 1,,, ,,, . . • , , ( ... , , ,. +O • . •1 • 1 • 1w 1 re I n , w r Y IV , F .. .,. i _.a a.. ._,:' '.. ..:_W..�� ._ i .' .:�:..� ., . . • , . .. . , „ , „ , ...... ,. , , , .. PROJECT SITE TRAF-FIC GENERATION Worksheet ' 1 g „ , , 1 SITE NAME: McCulloch-Meri n© Homes Pr,o sect ,,� , 'A. SITE USE (1) :, Multi-Family Residential . SITE SIZE (1) : 4 Units .4' UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE **: 7 trios%unit ESTIMATED MODAL SPLIT: 171. 05 ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE' TRIP GENERATION RATE (t) : 6. 65 trios/unit • .,. PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING AM PEAK (C) : 6. 0% of Daily • , PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK (D) : 10. 0% of Daily , TOTAL DAILY GENERATION (E)=A* S: 56 trios ' AM PEAK HOURLY GENERATION (F=)=C*E: 45 trios ' :,a �. ' PM PEAK HOURLY GENERAT I ON ' (G)=I*E: 66 trios 1 ' . ' AM ENTER TRIP SPLIT (H) 'f' ) : 0. 20 trios in f 'total trio ' PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT (I) (2) : 0. 70 trios ',in / total trios 1 . 1 - AM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN F*'H: 9 trios' r i os ' AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT F*( l-H) : Wb trios d PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN G`*I : 40 'trios '' a: {{uu X11.,.. PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT G*( 1-I), : 16 trios , . (1 ) I hfc Mat i On from Ryan O' Dri ar ;P l larr i ta Consultant 1 (d) Composite of 'Local Field Observation. • Y L. I i , At • . e r 4 1 '1 „ 1 a a '. Rb ERt KtetHr 0,t4 t, I • • l A Pi c.alloIx kt [ , t ' f , [ 1 I , I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I , , I , I ' t. , r • • ' \ 1 . i . , • I • {{{ I P.1 `Mi ,, � Q q • !Y i 1 . . „ i . : '' ',... ,.''. • .. l''• . : , . . . �r� lw+ w+vr +�.rri�.ICU d� a... k'w�+ �w � �'� .wyw �o�m p1ty ,.y 66B � � I } 1 J I � h 7'I • f t.. r i1, , , . , „C''‘,..,- . , ', i. , : ,,,.„.. •„.. ". „., • , .„„. . 1. — a tI f1 M 4 1 ' �' I r , � 1 : . • o • �wl \ , . .. ,, . / U I 41 to,b -- 10ti 4*Mf6 ■ 1 8 , ., I Si ; . „L.. .. ... . •i r • I to , ." A.pPE .NDI. • } ;J r� ` III .ttt i i I I . • .. r I • 1�� • 3 II �, I 1 n • I • t , . 0 1 i�. • I, i # ' el , z ,.i j3(L MT #n 6'14 , �4' r r ;lv i , r , �R • i ' .ncm a+fw► ■li rMe+. woo* i..O �Ctv' . . i! Olin a . . , , 1 i t . 1 / - . . 1 1 . . 4 . 1.....i.; . b 1 1 cS,11,.. ,..,/ C.,(-7)5f3 .e. ,., ,s— . , M 4*e,.. 0 L.L it,(.4'11"''' 4A t=1?...1 (.1 ..401',014 1 • tom ' 1 r , li t're. CI 0:t,3 '-iZ-ibi,'"re-A7 l , I ROBERT kfEtN, P.E. l f $63 441,633 3 II l r A L, • • �M A.:i rI N MI dam'r C u 1 C i. t.i ri g T .E E i,c F"L c ) I' ` o ..rrs ry ` t ' i r • 1 1 . • I i,. f 0 O „J cy)N ^. ..fir Q �N X1,3)47 `.,,, Vii, i.�t�l.* MT as/if7 ,�� ..(a)38T !p Cya).,.� 16 ,14 1 , 7f u a �DoCxro)."g �fi o f1,� .it, .`aV '4 ) .,.) VJ (7� • NI i . , ,,i11, , r— 1 '31 a ii i . 1 : t I 1 , 11 2 . 1 < 1 i,..a. 1 tyl 4 ' i i o' ,i , t3 °� m : x.05 ..r r i11 �0� 0 I ' 13 � , 44., (3 t7y I-% 1 t81)--4'' 47 .--1 r, l` G L h. .0 ty. �G 1 Z' �- 1=�4 �. -fir iI Iii, x' '� 1 Cc I m I . x� 1 'V � r I I 1, Roefilr KEEGN,tk,E, A1. Ai=6 ,tr! ...��„.,,,.�...,.... ,.r... ..,,,,.to ' ■ ' • 000o Pve-a... MT I AdP J 44 4c-c(„.)4, �4 II 'D t D C 3 77 ` �. ° � a 0 o ff'°� o d n a " --.. 1 ,. • 1 a 1 , . , 1 1 1 . , 1 , 1 1 1 . ,: )., , , , , , i , , , , . , . , , . , %. I . „,, ,,, 1 ., . ' ,'try Or. .aw :.r ..w ns Ire,. rr' ir"'+.��. +ori� ...br.�Mr:i.i fn Cry‘,... i 0". , " � � � � '� tai -�^:� r l,, l.r I" j M "' • I • '" --` • e 1 }} `?y ROBERT hEEcH, itii., t50J)441.633 ( \ C r• r M1 ( ', • '''''''''' -'': .„,,' ..'',:.'.',.,.' '.'...,.,,..,,.:.‘,...'','.,,.',,:,..',..','..''.'..''..,.,.'..'..'.,,...L''..,,,..,.',,',,.'',,.„,,„.,...,. .,,,.' ''''..''',,.'•:'.,..,,,,,.',,,L.,',,.''.,.,'''.''....''..'',',''' ''''''''' r } ' � �'� r • < l6.t.. ..i. i E.E£i' ` Y ).. T • r I C. •V • • ! . r 0 4 A w I r r x • ( o At.. 4 1i' if • .r1 , w YY i • • • I MM o^f° , ' I ,3 2 > i3 i d 1 /�� , 7 fo) � 'r nl 1� Cb(41 9 t . N" A • wro .uo say aim �sr wrw rpmy wws �...q 0 J w d 1 1 n (e' . 1 .C11. 2 is t 4 J ® i .'1 .1;° 4tof41) 581 3)..„i" y )te... - 1 art Ii 1 , ,,,.'r n kx p , RObEhT kEEeNr p■E, , fbb3i a41.4a3a1 + C 1 n r I l AIPaB' EJT o e A.i-i�:..1 ' .0 '�.!i E7 3.c-:t.g+E3 Ls.I',11 1' .t...''. a d . • ^ , 1 • L ., 1� •1 1 1 i i �..I ,I C? I ^ �9 4 .p. iT` �j°j • INTERSECTION O CAPACITY CIT1 AVALYSf a P INTERSECTION i;1 Lo �, :i'M ' ' Dr,e____I......p„.. :1_,,c..) ,_____;....,.......L.,... , . . 15 ;1 t„_JCi DESIGN HOUR YEAR_ Iyt �� ' ) ' ' - , . . • n TRAFFIC VOLUMES: ' N c;: �l . 15it i T CS' Nip : 1 knil°03 ' , ' , losiN ' ' , , ' ,' ' CAL MOVEMEN CRITICAL LANE'VOLUMES t tl ' R�C`f'ION CRITI C . EAEST 1 ' . 1 G , E„ „ NORTH/ TH 5 85 " OF CRITICAL 7 . SUM LANE VOLUMES r (.,0 . . ' L ' - - ' ' ' , ' 1 NUMBER.OP PPFIAS n 1- LEVELOFSERV10E 4 r 1 1 , ,, , , , .Sum. of Crit iical Lane Volutes ' [ ' I.eve1 ,of .Service WO ;Phase, 'hr.ee,Phase F'oiur.of More Phases A 900 855 'tit" i I 1050 10O0 G 1200 ' ' , 1140 1100. • - D 11S 5►' ,,, "), \ i r it 't „ 1 g not ae lica i � � 150 1425 l' l t5a1 . ,, ■ :INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS , Bo .INTERSECTION �A L PA c. � N b tc, I r '7 , ?•DESIGN 'HOUR/YE 0.R-..An,1 ' t. fz r� r c. • 1 .' TRAFFIC V OLUMES. � I l . ' '. , H , V7S i ' ' ' , ' " l' ' , ' ''' ' ' ' ': ' ' ' '' ' " 1 '1 si�f�v 1 i , : , :, ii?) i i � a ,, H 1 ',:: , , : i 4 4 , •1 i 1 1 DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL' LANE VOWMES EAS1/VVEST : 17 ' ' ' ' � NORTH/ .UTH a cb ♦ o 1 CRITICAL LAP1E1VOLM . . :,:, , ,, : :, L, , ' : : , ,' ,: 1 , ,, ' : , Num ERA Cr PHASE I , 1 1 z 1 1 VEL . SEMI 'I A 1 1 1 Shia.of Grit ical Lane Vo iumea . L+ vrl of Serv,,te Two _Phase Three. P� �. F ar or...More.... hasel F�aae A 900 855 825 H B , � ��10Sf?� � � • 1000 � 9S I C 1200 1140 . ' 1100 ' D I350 127S 122S E 1500. 1425 . � S - � ��it ,.•-, � rr ��t i1tlplloib1R 4,,,, iY F.;, 's w .s :iei ,, Las' m, , ,, . 1 ...�,,w,._.,,w.,.., . ...,., ...,.�. _.�.... ................. �_;.. ... .�.. .. .-. ,,. ,.. , ,. ,,..,., a ,n.,,,�.... ....,... ...... ,,, .... ..�,„ N, �.�. ,�,. ,. 4 A • . INTERSECTION CAPACITY AN L ill • I INTERSECTION....: (PA-C.l'�t t.. 4 vi Ara p 9-)6 1--L M' ' IrLD D ' ' '•'DESIGN HOUR/YEAR M b' t,',T I N' ' ' ' ' ' V L ME ,, N TRAFFIC � U S o ' ':::. ' 'I': '',..1,',.:: ,,'': ' '':::',,,':', '::''''H: " .'''::,:: , ' ': :, ' : :',1 . ', ' '',. ::H 0 ' ...4 : '' ''':: '''':': . . ''': , ''',',, -1 ' .::::,:•-':: ':',,': ,:',:,' :, ''::' :: , ,:'' :, ' ,,.1, •:17:: :: :,, ::,. , : :„ 1 ' '' 11',: :'...,:,1, :, :''. .'::::,::':,' ,:,: :::' ,',, : '', : :, ' , , ' ': ' ' ' , ' : : -1: :1::::1\:,: ., ',:'' .- : :,': :" ' 1: ' , :: ,', ' ' ': : :',' ::' ::' ..: ::::H :,:::: :.',.: , ' {i` 1 ,:i : :,, :,: ,r: ,, '.., :,, : :, i' ,: ,: , " :1-- N ..4...-:, : . ,' ' .- : 'I ' *-11■ . : 1:-: :.- '• -: , •,,, .- ' I . DIRECTION C RI.'ICAL .MOVEMENTS, CRITICAL LANE VODUMES ' ST E ' :' i' : . 1: -11 ' ''' ' 11 ' :: -- : 1 • : :-1'; 1 1 ': . :' : ': 1-11 ''H : : .1 1'1- ' . 1 .' '. ' .1 : " a EAW � t 2 rvO . K SUM OF CFiITiCAL LANE VOLUMES . 1 9G , , ',' .'.' . '.. 't . ',''NUMBER 3 OF PHIASES ' LEVEL OF SEPI1i1C I, 5u m of Ctiti ical Lane Vol�+�es 1 of Service Tjo Pha Three.Phase Fours o '. t4,or.e Phases. Lee r A 900 855 825' 1 00 98 5 a c�5o 1,' C 1200 1140 1100 0 1350 1275 1225 , E' ..500 . 14/5 . 137 5 1 F 11ea'�1e .:. f 1, ....,' ,. t„. ' ', ' ' ' ' ' ,'-' 'H -H::'H'' ,1,' '' , H', ',, ' 'H ,,H; : ' , H''' E ' ' ' : :: , , ' ' • INTERSECTION' CAPACITY ANALYSIS ) IC � INTERSECTION c. . . DESIGN HOUR/YEAR ••f • e;, c, ' 't '' ' ' - ' ': ' ' " ' ' ' HI ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '" — ' ''' . : ' ' ' ' ' ' • v a . • , 1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES : i p • 4 -..—..��..or,.m...�..�� lz6.; . . . . , , , , . , , . : �1� , , , , . ,0: .,--11:',-9 , , , ' . ' 1:: :H' ', ' ' , , : ' : ,,u- '7 :''' ' : ' : ' ' H INP ,.. ' , 'H N , - ' \ 1 ' ' „ :,'ON CRI° ICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL LANE VOWM ' ' ' . / . , . , . . .. . M aIR��TI E� • 4 I 2 I 1 • I: , NORTH/ 1°H 1 ' '1 n,, ., ,, ,H1', , ., , , ' .: ',' ' - b 8 I YEQ I • � Sl1t0 OF GI7 ICA L LAND VOLUMES , $l. � NL�NiEER I H E1/ LEL o ��R1nC G I � I I u o I Critte l Katie i'oiiimes. 1 �,evel of Six 'T�ra �� ---,--- Fo�t�r os More Phases Phase � Pptas . ' iee T red I 825 � - , I 855 , A 9�A0 � I 1000 965 I .� I � li�SC � I . 1100. e l2 t� 1l'4 I ; I ' 75 ' ' 12I5 ¢ 13 5 1 2 1560 1425 I ' 1)75 I II not applietible .- , a �« I loaf Gai n 1 • 1„ i • • ' I. • K• I . I • it lifr ,ii, I I � I I I I o, I I i 1 1 , • (' e . • ' . . ., . . , . ' , , • - • : , • , , %. ' . I . ,f1 ......,...I. ln.., .11 . 1 I .. :,. . ... . I . , 1 , . .r, r . .. . . . . . ., . . . ... . . , . ,. . .., .. . •, . . , . .. , ,,......, ... . . .... . , : . . UNSIONALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET , i, . „,. i. .7. . . Bull Mt. Road and Frontage Road , 1 . . I ' x D , x Frolltane ' : Date of Couritu ExIstlng . — , : 8 ' 8 , ,1 „ :, ,, ,, , Day of Week.: Weektay , , , - x x , , h r Ti1.6e of Day:, AM I : , „ ., , . , xxxxxxxxxxxx . xxxxxxxxxxxx PrevaIlino Soeedu 30 . . ,, B : 4 of 1 on maor stl-ee : A , : ' , , . ' • APPROACH GRADES: " : ' - .1 . : 1 : xxxxxxxxxxxx '.. ;,( XXXXXXXXX j. A 0%.1B 0%:13 0%:D 0% L., Bull: Mt Rd . ' x * x , , : SHARED LANESu , 1 , APPROACH x x '„ : il. , , : ' Cu all 'f. '' x ', C x ' : H ' APPROACH Du all '.: . - APPROACH > > > ) )'> >A ( C‹ ( (.(<>'-Y} ) > > > D <'< <.< ( ( (} ).> > > .› C‹ < < ( < < <).) > ) > ) > B (. ( ‹Xe, ‹ , MOVEMENT , L. AT: .', AR DL'.. DT DR : CL CT CR Bt.:. BT LAR ,', • ' VOLUMES 40 210 , ' 0 ' „87 20 : '48 : .,. 3 10 27 0 53 17 I , . : , - f.:1(..;,H • .44 , ' ! .',312.1 '1212 47 . :' : .3 11 31.2.1 1 . RIGHT TURNS FROM C -,(CR) : , ) : ,,f ' , , , : ...: * CONFLICTING FLOW .. 5AR.-1-AT.,4 210 ' ' ''' :-,' ' H.." ' ' tROACITy .".. : .• , , . '7776 ) ' 1, CRITICALE3AP= 6SEC.' ' ' IMPEDANCE . ADjUTNT= 1 , ADJUSTEDHCAPACITY ', 776 ' 1 CAPACITY USED= 3..87%, ,,:1MPEDANCE 'CREATED:7 . 97 :DEMAND ' ( . OA) y RIGHT TURNS ORMA) DR). ' f , : , ' '. ; :, '' 1 1, , ' , • • '1 : CONLICTING rLow, ,. .5pr.‹.4.,,E4T= 61,,t5 ' :..'. :: - CAPOCTTY , : „ . . - , ' CRITICAL "BAPr7 GSEc, 1MPEDANCE :ADJUSTMENT 1 : ADJUSTED CAPACITYH , Y.' : : GAPACITY USEDLT! 5. 02%: IMPEDANCE: CREATED= '.. 96 . DEMAND (LOS;:.tA) ' 1 47 " . LEFT TURNS EOM A ' (AL) r • CONFLICTING rLow ER--ET 70 '. '. ' ' , , CAPACITY' H , 1 1123 f , . CRITICAL ', 5SEC,, IMPEDANC) ADjU3TMENT.7-, 1 :', :, ''' r 'usii .i cAPACITY :. 1183 CAPAOITYUSED . 94% IMPEDANCEHCREAT '9 ED=, . 7 ;., : namoNn . (Los-o) '.. 44 . THUR MOVEMENT FROM..„..t (CT):1 CONFLICTING FLOW ..5ARtAT'FAL4.8L+8T+bRt-t. 880 ,'' ' ' CAPACITY ': ,.: CR'lylcAL OAP.---, 73EC.',1' : IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENTt... .. 97 ' ADJUSTED CAPACITY 638 1' ' ''' ' tAPACIIY:: pED= 2. 04% • „: IMPEDANCE CREATEDr.,1 .,99 ".'' fomAND (Losa.tA) 11 . • ' ' THUR MOVEMENT FROM ID , (DT), . CONPLICTINGH'FLOW ' . 519R+8T8L+ALLI7AT7I'AR4,1! 811. 5 , CAPACITY : CRITICAL. G1:1P7SEO. I IMPEDANCE onJI,JsimITL--.! . 97 ADJUSTED CAPACITY . .. CAPACITY, USED=1' 4.L04% ''' IMPEDANCE ,CREATED=, ..97 , DEMAND (LOSA) 24' ..... . . L.FEFTH TURNS .FR0M C (CL).,,, ' ' ' ' "• H ' ': : - H.h , ', : ' h. H : ' :r : CONELiCTING FLOW .BAR.E.AT±AL4'8L+8T+0.R4.DT*PR== 883 : CAPACITY H : 463 J„ /11, . . 1 CRITICAL' GAP4-t! ,I,'.5SEr IMPEDANCEADJUSTMENT , . 9, :ADJUSTED CAPACITY ' 417 l''''' I (' : t PAC'Y.TY USfliD:7 O78,X,' , IMPE,I)ANCE' CREATEDz:— 99 '.' HtEMAND (LO $t:sAL 3 I' - LEFT Rom ,■6 0, co :c FLOW, . 5PR-1-P7+,8L+AL-1-AT-4..AR+CT+CR=t •348.'5 CAPACITY • . : CkITIQAL 3AP :1,', 58EC.'., : IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENTh .'58 ADJUSTED CAPACITY , . CAPACITY :USED S...55%. IMPEDANCE cAEATE::D= ..,, $),T1 DEmANo (LS : ) , 1*, CAPACITY CF SHARED LANE$',FOR :APPROACH O, 664 -. .: DEMAND (LOS#=A) „ 44 . .. (11 fl( i;1".ti-or-7 SH(4REi`,L) 1,,.it».11F;;;;i3 FCI q Ar.'-',.tri i'-:(D A O H t) 8 8 .1)EIYIANI 0 .(ii„..08,,,.:1(..-:4 , . _ : . , .: , , . , :, . , , ,, , . . ',.. . . - . - .., . LOvel Ot Sevic.:',.e, • :8t,,t,t,,, , :, . . .•' , , • :, 00k: 'HH ,,,,i ': ,''- 4, ( , .. . . . , , i I UNS 11.N 1IA1.«I'ZED JY►\I"1 ir.I i:}is C' (N I JJI`I CAPACITY I�"►•Y WORKSHEET„ � 11:;++t Jl i M t; a R 1.!��a c;i �,A 111 'i 1'r'�0 11'1;:A C1 E.1 R y..... s;1 d : ' 1 . ' x Lt x F 1.IL Iw'I1''I't::% 7 i.s'' ; Date c I�1'� C",1:".11»t 1"I`C; it '1 µt"I-.I'1;t ,1. `I"r'Y d'I�'f";I. ,, • x x Day ,-,1'F Week:A Weekday ' x x , Time 3.tI1 rw? '1:+f' D<a y II Arai ''' ' ' x xxxxxxxxxx Xx x XxX;(xxxxx Pt"PV x. J. ,i''r"�q pPPd " ;;I l • B ' 4:: "f :1. .t"I!":? 1 1n ' ri ;I or steetIt 8 " \. • ' A ( 1'.:tP1f l':J+ I:.;`rH GRADES: : Y ' ' I') f � x 't I i%' { 0% 11%11 1«.� I % i � ' ' �Yx�u>t��,xx;�;�� xxxrt�xxxux x� PI �.,p a>�. �/ >i'C �r� a�_. �r ', E Lt.Y�L Mt, Rd X• r ' ' �. HP RED 1...I NE. : ' • , x iw11='11='f.C.:I 1C 1"1 Cg all.' ' x C x ,f11:11P11' OAC1H"! D p, 'a 1'1 ' f:r" ::IRC1l9c1.Ni :) ) ) ) > ) ) Al< < < < < <,<) > > ) ) ) ) i.7„<< <`K < ( < <) ) > > )> > C< <'< (''< < "<> > >',> > >;:) F: < ( < <,,, , . ' . tYto�. :E.mI '1f..I.1 r11,_ AT Alf DI_ DT, DR . CL. CT ' CR 1: L. Err' �Br ! . VOt«,Y�C'.IJME:S ' 412:I ';�;;xl4 ' IZi 27` 2;1. 48 '3 14 ? 'If;;I 53 1.7 '' . y 30,' LEIraF-1 44 3ICI 1::::;:?; 47 ; 3 15 R.I,o f-'r "f,4.1 F;1t s 1'-','i' t,J 1v1 r (C31 ) CCI 1t 1 ►,w 1 CI:I:NGEi....OW . �t ce+-1T. 24 , iAPAC I L Y , "7 I i'.2,, .. ' CR1T I C LOA hi, 6SEC. , I 1"1M D /Ct D W TMI ".- 1 ADJUSTED crIrA« IY• 74 '' (.:�r-11:1r4c:I:"i"Y usa Dr- 4a I;?1 ;fp 2*.min EDANCE C•RE TED- 1��J l DE1Y;i iv1x <t,.OE3 A) w%+r1 7 61-1-r 1"►(! 11s C)RlY1 { R) ,' ,•' C0NaVia;I_i C'1"I rN.I G �P'1,_C)1J n JJ it.x;19"I"= Si a �5 C 1 1AC.;1 T'Y. 9tp�1�, ' ' , - • . ' CI�I I"'1'2;C C(-1i,.., I tt.-1w ssI .(:,"; I IYICw1}DAIvICE: ADJ'US1 Ml 11T4...' 1 f.i)D,:!'US"I"ECD GA ACs 1:'llry" , ,:,,,,�� 1 ' fw+'9i'"11-10 J.,"iY Y ,US E0= 5,.'0i:..'4...74; J I 5a L:I.74; x I'I tu L�FNQG CRLt Eb" a iu .51 P N ) 1 .O « ) 47 1 t ' LEFT u it m w Q M A ,(AL) ' • : ' CONFLICTING PLOW R-I- w..7 70 � c :fC y,T1 .1Y;188 : i i ly { Ill, N. � " , � ..t '� (.11, ry"1 li y t .++,', Ici-11:'i :� ,tai. CHAP= !sE,..C,n 'I Mp1L:D'+:Nc1; l i;�'t.JS"Ch'f�.;i'�11" . i r ,`t. s i111 o Ct t1�-SAC is"i"Y`�, 1 11 . ; ' ;, - ' C 1I::Ir-lC:r I TY, L!` EI).Y ;. Y �./p I tYIPI 'DANCfE C PEA�"I"E'1a�-_a J 7 ' DE.k11lN:) ,,L,C.I .i4:..Via) , : Ic(,4 ' . . , 'i"H t:J ttR' trl C:.i��)L;1Yl is�1i-r, 1w i'�tt3 m C C,C:,"f'') Co rgt.' «.1,C"1" 11\I C ,LOW' a 5 A P.+0 +1.t +8 ±8'1'-IHB,R 234 x.11.1 1:„1A .J T 5:,'I)0, L M'I 0 . . CRITICAL 3 P= $ C ” IMP 7ANC ; DJU$` hEN1r a' 7 f D ! . 5 ;d CAN 1C. rY Ib ♦ 4t l �° t;A.1IAcl111-«y, +G r"= L a 92% IM P uD y . C IR EA IEi.r) ,a 50 t)yl,'t.ly 1j"\1 D ( . OS ) :t.W: + i „ W � � i 'FROM • c o NI 1::L 1 C T:I:11 tw Ir"LO W p 5 81'+t-h 'I'`+81.:,+f=1 t._.+t;:1"f'+r I ' 5` « �1 t�q C T"i"qtr :: u ti.� '��vv ..1 �tau 1 �„E'«:1(..:, C «�1 ., ,t I.M.y >+" t .Iy"N i tw w �u C:1, NN ?.y.y �/ ,.,' �+ • 1::Y::1'" y I 1'1. �..1 N� 7/} y1 C Yln'1µ„.I `1 NI ».. /} 1/ I 5 - t I."ra ;5 la"I.41 f-s� 1 IY�J 1 I� I.J�"11 1 ♦�{••«�M Ik 1 1 1 t.r�l"�I'11�rI Iw �,l..J W W'Mr�I'I MW I� i � 11.i5 f 1��5�..�1.r� M l../ ./�1'-1 r.� 4J f"'l1N'1 Y""+�� 1 i f J�`�11..D,+y' l.�b �'�•II+.i% J.Iit t"11iw,l).()t`11.3fi?, C'I"t.W+.A"! 4...I.f'."" n 97 DLg1m+r"4I\I.IN) \LO7 tl..lr1) L ti ';� I ' L EP—I" " NRN N R D M ' LI C L ) 'CC11 c i x n C PLOW �a « » " +iw - °8 "+ R " f+4 �w , 41,8 C iiP C TY xI.'...:!;. I ' a. '.y y 1.".Iy r. � ^y, -5 N Iu� 1.u ".l r -,1 »" .� N 5 i : t lu 'CR 11"I C.�t�11L iu�>' PtT= �' „!i,S Ca ;Cit1PEL')ANCIE: r l:.)J�usTM .�N t L. (11U,Y1«JS i"t.D +,:.,r P��:,:c i`'Y :�+.a � !'. Cy tJ'11 aw C .,Y f(i't`:{ - t wr1I,.u.rw`(.11,\I y+•.- C .�N.,�r Iw. wi1 7 y� '199 y�, ,i 1l,jw + C2;:is I,..�a'�,,j'( �c V-11" A C:.I,«1 111 L 7 Li..D... . 76.'4. I 1 P,G:r;p C L. C I C,:'A"1� 1J � . ;D li.:,�M ( 1 I) (La.4u L,. J.:'/ Yu: .w 1 i -1 I.N.1�.,Iw 1 1 ..t�t�8 I-�C.J h'I 0 C J.J LI") 11, I '..7.".1:::1,14,;; 1 " M v5."N y�:'� i, N cr t N. «, ! ■ t:.:a:.I h1 Pr„L i c T i 1'10 1-t".:01A a -INS;+T+,i1 L+t l...,+r °i'+r-1 F .1-C.,:11-r".r p�M :3 6.,,, ;a c,rl,i P ci r, C �'I�Y ; 46,0 , , C: 1• II"1":1 c✓:.I L C' /- 1�: ,q;,i t"3 i:».C a J MP Ei D ANC I” f""� ')J t,,J; fl'i h.l i" a 1"�*)i ` A,D 1 UNJ;3"1`i,O 1;A Iw1 A C,,17,Y 4 it;a 3 N�J" Jal NN w L 'HI N � i Jl YIN♦ ill IN. 5 N, � � ••.1.1 4, 11 N � � ,Irti �,�, Y I V 'I.w N",I' t.;;Al /l , I t y _18 8 F,:.. Wr ')5.�I+,'' �l M i'N11:",.D A N C1,�wr �-.i i'6 E«I�wi"r iiii.D," a r1�J D E rit f"1111.1 (11«0. ,`3 �u,) � x.11"I I ' Il �.,{ l 1"lY �II C:if ryi f ,� % ..(N .. ' Y 't 'y 11 t 1 ,1: 1';I:1 ')C �I ry 'OE SHWF F.ID` IN Aikl(N,8: '�F I}c!iR ;f1f, F' Or-P(.,,1-1 C�. 61E13 I) 1ti( ND (L.,tD;3«g-f l.) ' 1, . l ICY 1« I I 1 J �"'1, l.i " 1 1 " � P1 r-1 r•;1 t,,�,;C '{ �'��I� �.�1�;�11Nt�;�I:) �i1w f 1 f\1 r�;C�i� M� X11 ur�'I11�C.�r1 Wi(`I� ,D ,1�1 t � � ; ,��:M r"Y I'•1 J:) ,i,N,C�C�,a.1 ra), � � � 100 I' ?I.»►uJ` LNNC.VtS1 of 8841-"so 1C„"�w .yaEhtr q Is3t 1 1. . ' . , k+, r I r � UNS E ry LIZ ED I NTERs : C JON CAPACITY 4 ?N K:Y ,HEE" I I ,I.tIl 1 :Mt'„ Road arld 'rKot"lt ape Road I ' x' 0 >< r 1 :'S''I'b -• it=? Dat't». •' of c..�:ur•1'C: ;i t' "•'' ' I >< x Da:,',/ o'I' , Ifir e e k, Weekday, . x x °I"x ri f e I;:r'f D a y'e (��'IYI xxx}<' x 1, x � > ' •` S1 x u. I t. ,.:�f�C.P_t� x ,wr ti t of 1 a"ai"1e+ c n ma'a j o1'"' street :: : !i»; ,•• , I 1 : I • 1 • , ' APPROACH G RAJ :S x I Y -f Y -'S If n 1 1J�){`.Jl'�J 1, `'�J x / 4 / ' f111 n fl�•<x J11 ' Bull I'I'I;; x (-� 0%:B �.If,1 l.N �»I�x n.t.� �I ru , Rd > x SHARE L,ANE5 a • • x x APl::•'ROACH Cg a all ' x C x' APPR.L ACH .D all APPROACH > ) > ) ) > > A X < ( ( < ( ,> > > > > > r) < < < < < <,<> > >I>.> >'YC ( <,< < < < (> > )'> > >1„ < <1% < '< < '( • ' MC:1V YII•.N`r AL. r,\T1 AR DI, 1 'DT D1R 1 'Cl.. CT ' C:aR k if» 8T' DI 'VCI,'„Uh1Ewi 1,0, i' 0 7' ,1•�:'`►2I 8 F_�'1O �;»t.ii r 7 i°1 t a I-I J• 1:;$8 ,16 {i 6 9 1«��1 dl,�i 1. rr. 111 .1 l 1 �� w !. . .�r t::�H C �»LJ f�c I�Ca 1 �C.J 141 t», (t..,�? 9 , CONFLICTING FLO W ,A -IA" =•' 113 a : CAPACITY � 8 L C r° J U A . CAP - ; a C k IMPEDANCE ADJ UETMENT= 1 A )J JCT1r`I # • • CA:ACI f Y I. E D= l 4;%, IMPEDANCE CRE Cl . x ; : HDEMAND ( . li-""( ) .:t . f 1:E Hwlr, Tt»JRNS FORM 0, (DR) 7' ' C:1CJ11•Ii 'I.:w:l C21w:l:Nl7 •1=,SLOW . 5B 1:t!F•1i1T= w 1.► Ix 5 oislpf.1C::::1 77,s, 11 . CRITICAL CA - �; �r 1 I � „ LA4~� A�J J `MLN T . I flZ)..JJ8Tf:U ,Alw A , C T Y 77S,' { IcAPAc Y ` CEI � pa ax% 1Y aDAhCCREACED= x r:4 ,DEMAND bb ,1 1., _ f °w U t X ''P R O 1 � C FLti, CONFLICTING FLOW � � ' ' ' CAPACITY 94 ; i • '' ( :I :" zCAr GAP= -stcti r ' =r WNtE A J J " 4EN "= 1 ADJUSTED 'CAPACITY,Ct:C.:1'`t 948 ' rAJ"''iI C :r" y USED= ;1,x 1 i,% 1:(t'IP5nANCE • C R A " »,)= '„ 9. 1 Lar ; , Ys"i=• ' I , LEFT TURNS IwRON t . ) ' " ' 'j tI FCJNI'µ•L.x t T:C NB , L_iJ,WI !'-i TR+rA t«-• 1 17 ' ' , Ch(1'AC :I:'TY, 1082, ' 1. :11 CRITICAL f = 5 S C IMPEDANCE ADJ JS MEN .g i � M i JU5 D CAPACITY : l082 : . ,' cOPAC 1•n1'Y rU`E ELD ','"28% I r'tP1-�..I ANCIE CREE 1'TEn.—' 1• !•>E{r r'-•'1ND t L.OS-'I"A J 3 ', • '.i. , , THuR, movEmNT tl, 1 'H •1 � C 4 +r (CT)' 7 )' ' . CD\ L: CT'I N1 `Ir,1OW u FR -AC "AL 8L+ : = 35 I x 5 1 C ( C - Y 532 �' .: « ( CRITICAL � �� 7�F� a IMPEDANCE A- JS NT». 1 a � � PP wSTFp ( 1 A 1r Y , w ; A-•Iw 1(�L n.1 1Y (...181t M :/ yy t 4�off xll `'1 I».I.� �� N n �r±�TE1:D::a 9 7 D E M f')\I Au f 1 C ,•+1 rti/ tfy« • • T 11 R YO V»r 1Y E \ -' FROM►a7M D (L)",) ' p t1N lr)w 1:C,`I .I:I`I fa ,FLOW + ! �;_ 'lA�..I+LI� »A ill{.-I f i YC' i A I =' 380'4, t�;t�1 t~'(1 C;;T r'>',: ,»�,il' 1Yl •{{1 111 .,/1Y•.y,(,� �}•Y p•+ ,(A T Y.: r 5 i• • � t.:r I'\•I:Ii I C�'1 L ti A P,^= ,�1,:f E(«Y'11 ' IMPEDANCE ` 1 D J 1.J�S T 1 1 I (•I 1.1.: n 'I ;j P ' : 'CAPACITY' S IY, ' ,� ADJUSTED ,;:�'�(•i,� , w A : C C •Y U S;L - Id 6 11/:, � 'is M P DANCE CREATED rl. + 1 )f l•D <t C s t!•A) 36 i LEFT TI, \ + FROM r (CI ) •/ � wa l•I, T CT: N 'F I�ow w: A ?+A ,`l.'ft.+Ll. F8 r» rwl C Y 1R: 4481 ; CAPft.. rY 48 12) I ' • CRITICAL +�.« 7. ^,.s rw ', ' MP L Nc r«. P D U wN1 - J 6,4. ,A J E E D ' C C . .Y H370 , rf{ w A1 AC TY UL I =E:4 � 8% I r 4 ED NCE C.:R :� fC� ` DEMAND (L OE p ) 7'1 • 1 ' ' LEFT T_ ,NC ROM 1. c Lr LN "Lr �T N O FLOW ,1 3 f °E .H I � °I»A= A R t -iw 2 r - 365., $ -CAPACITY ' 4 7 8 1 C rT JCt:11A=y ' 7 f � S E C 'it tiPECANCIW A Y1.J8.TMNY,.. ti'1 1, Ab TJ E7 YAPAJiJ Y I5 , i 1 C.,AI,.:Ir C.::l:y US5:D raa tier'% :1:MPEI:roI�1C Vii: EIt«r' �I) 1,, 7,8 DerinN'z <I::,.l'1; Z J ;I,,::a • 1 j ' YN .AN Y lI" !s HA ED I LAMES u JI 'APPROACH r S44 ' ' DEMAND f L CS» A) 47 , ,• " ' ° ' L11C ( ;: r Y 116HA .6 P � ~ C FOR APPROACH • O w28 i.:M �D 'I„ 0';—r) ; 24 l;r �1 L I t !ri 4, t d t_ = Y.;1 s V r:.�,•�' �rl•1" $6.1''`�:;I+c"0 t a3''' 164{,6y,!�1y31". /�, 5p31 / It �I,fx1 • . ' ' ♦ f 1 dP ■ . -' L « 1 7NAL zED l \ E R S E7 " r Oe CA- C l r Y WORKSHEET , ,. , Elul Mt n R o a d 'ant Frontage Road d .. x �a ", 1ml 7 1::1►;It r��'; : "i"IW�b 1, T r'.'wti,,!°Ia::i r ' >, �> �, I'°1 1.Ir'f 11 L:i t". Date t.:, I.' >< x Day 1r1•I" W r k,: W e e k,ca a x x „Time Y'„,t,}f Day,,n I.,�vI , xxxxxxxxxxxx xx <x? exx <xx> Prevailing S ar ed n 3► r * of lanes on major s't r�e t '• 2 ' ' I tA 1 x xx' x APPROACH GRADES: x <xx><yxx < >�xxhx> xxxxx � c � p n r.d L, l �L � I , 81„ 1I Mb Rd x • x I « D y , n 1 ! j 1 x x APPROACH , x J; x 'APPROACH D a l l I APPROACH > >) > > > f <'( ( ( ( (,<> >.> > > > > D ( ( ( ( ( ( <) > > ) > > > C < < < < (> )') ) > > > E: ( < ( < ( < 'MOVEMENT', ' AL: I I J f}^1:; DL D1 T DI CL I C°I"I ' CRI 1 1W pi"I» t l Iii VOLUMES 0 1.I I2 . 7 1810 Z7- , E 0 , B 2 �' 1 2 8 213 47 , ` �� al G: 8 I 13 , , , ( '1, „, , ' •.. „ , , , , , , , „ , , 'RIGHT TURNS, FROM C (CR) I CONFLICTING = _: + � �h =T 103, 5 . CAPACITY :,' 666 CRITICAL., 1= - 63EC,'. 1 MP )ANCE "bJUSTMENTH 1 nJ13 E L C! = L1T; sr 6 ' I' '' CAPAC:c:rY USE i)= 1..47%,71� ' r' S= .;, c. i{!�' lrl>IC. Csfl:�.t��"f 1}= LEI ' It=1 hlI (I.w.C1,,a t f ,,_+ RIGHT TURNS FORM (t R) ' 'CONFLICTING FLOW . 58R-1-8T=1 2; 6a 5 cAPr c I rY ' 752 ,2 `., CR 1:T:!:C:;cL.. GOP= 6sJE Cn IMPEDANCE AD,.raSTMEIC"i 1 AL1JuS"I"E L) CAPACITY 7 52 ' ' CAPACITY' USED=- "6« 781 IMPEDANCE DANCE CRI f TEDµ . 94 DEMAND (LC:1l i ) I 66 LEFT, Ta RNS F RUM t7 (OL) ' t'::QNFL»1:C T a:IvICa F L,OW D +E T 8621 'CAPACITY 980 . . CRITICAL GAP= 8 C. IMPEDANCE ; DJUS7 M N = 1 ADUs 1 L D C1J c C l Y 0 . . oG PtI: 1:"('Y usE D= 1,-'8% " ,' IMPEDANCE k: CRE A"I:'E:D= 99 p 'r 1taNI:) (LCs; _'0'0) 'HA I; I " I` L,E:i-ww '1H U R N; F'R O IY1 5, (8 i«H) CC31\IF L:I:CT:t Nt F LOW r I +AT " 107 CAPACITY ' , ,H1082 ' CRITICAL r I"'= ` SEC, . IMPEDANCE Df NCL AX yJLJST111: N`1" 1 ,ADJUSTED,ADZUSTED CAPACITY,G TY 1 f i8 • c a r: 1 C 1:""Y 'l,J s LI I). n 88'./. i M l+»I'w:t)r.ICI C (i C IR~E; '1 w I:5µ . DEMAND (L: r i) 3 1 THUR IYI(J V L iYa hl'1” ( M C: ' (; T ) 1 CONIF L I CTI NC rLiw iAR"I" I � L-JhiL J t HiR= w;7 . C =€ Iil ,, I ti�;li';.'; " I CR 1 «1 C"V L ' C -= $ W d " I Y : bA NC t 0 JU 8 T Y N .:5.9 A D Ju s7 rn ' 1 P C1 TY 508 'L , ' , ,CAPACITY LJwr f 5Y 51% IMPEDANCE' CREA N= 96 DEMAND (LOSwJ) MJ r '1"HI„IJR MC Yhwi'�iI :NT FItsoM ,r (I)1 ) I e ,1 ;, Hw, «rr .I�w +,H".. t. J` ., +4 +«/ J I»I'i�.l iI 1••1 +�" �, H JI L,•'��.1' :' l -ti.1i«-I-1�I L�"I-A l...1�.(^1'r'wlw1 A N= �;1H11''�d ,y C(�Jl 1 t l C J f"t �.�I.,;a 1. Il C'.11 IIa « � n� ' ( C.(�l C fw, ! I (r ' I+1+. ,, . ».i« M 1 1: u ly I fy V +14 a, 1" tin +V, w 1 1 W 1 p �I h +y t1.N.�./I�t i, ' ' C i'i Ili I►'N;A L I G l I::l;: 7 S E C✓a 1:rel('wl E I t-)ICI L:.IJ» to 7 J L,J W«y i rfi i i� '� ».« . «� ti:1I D,J'1J S'1,1,J�.J I r».�f'� 1��'t 1.'',Ty +.a - 1 . A f I Y," a «n „ w1 n 8 4 ) d' I" «LZJ W G. H I J p;I:."N D M . 95 ', , I' J w M` D L.n1/O a N } 41 1 1 1 • ,. L w: „ u t N s N F Y C (L L ) : r A ;oN -LX CT ING „;LC W p 5A t; t~ L 4,1L•1«$ -t-13R-Pa I D R,= r 3 5 C1 :C i t 1 w,, 1, .1»HR T 1 A I 40M » /„ , ; 8 r > l Y N I M x C o r i r.:10JuT� _N «"«J n _0 A JJ $1iu w p t1A h L.J. 1 y w ', ` ” ;Xl . s J1 Y 'J ED " N w v IMPEDANCE ,CREATED= „ 8 DEMi AND (t_1,OS=18) „ ' I 9 1 LET TURNS' PROM, D (DL) ,',. ,JI J' ,w. « � w, 1� 1. li w.l 398. 5 ly, i t»ly ,H r 455 �i" y” �,� y « ll` .!+ 4 T+ +' H1.,;J "w�+I)1 11•I»i;..R +Cr l"I"IIWt�= C,: 1"''AC!1 I Y' yy I«+!1 t 4 F .,.:+.1...C,i I .L r�I lr h`+L.»G.'J Iii �Y ,«��,1•� .I.. I I..Lw, r"I L. 11 1 I �1 �' ql. 1++, ,1 +,` HI Iw IIN J� K• , YI,!«. w { +i.,4 41 ,• � 1 , .1 4.;If N11 � l 1 M”./.y.1 11♦ i' • •1 r; ! 41 J 1 ��iii 1,� !_ h 1. 1',l i::i'�1 L, f1:JC:)II«�m .7 W 5 C�E t".;d r IYi I J" ,D f•'�N c 1_ 'r,:i I:.',JU s I M I N I w d .�4 ,, .)ti tj,la I"r+�J D C:.+W f''u,l l�,L I Y 4 28 7 , I C APF CN 1.TY USED= ;34011 84% Ira'rhP1`I:)ONCE 1 I Ck8NT5D=I , 77 ' OEM AND (LOC mil ) 18:x I• r , Qt 1PI lI: ,I,»i';T"' t:1F „SHARED tIH Il\lL,"i r Of APPROACH"I C „524 I71 f`nr'1"INLr (iH;t `:ilE4a) L C;ni o i T'Y' 1:31 1,i3H ONE'LI, Lfµii E$J (JR APPROACH I:SAi"JHI D ' 504, DEMAND (Lw+ ,:I1a l; i 839 li+ 41 � , yy Ck M . � h t r G J �r�1 » ' , INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS . I INTERSECTION DESIGN HOUR/YEAR non 1 �' 'r�T r�(~7 .• 014 , TRAFFIC VOLUMES a era L4-11 N � DIRECTION ,CRITICAL MOVEMENTS OVEMENT S CRITICAL LitkNE 1/OUVES EAST/WEST NORTH/SOUTF o1 SUM! OF �C�t�11C�L LANE -)4) NUMBER OF PHASES 'S f � C LEVEL OF �� S�R Sum of Critie:il Lane Volumes Phase Four' ot More Phate�s, �� Two F�ia�ae � three Phase �e�vel, of Service A 900 1 855 825 B 1050 1000 5 1200 1140 1100. b 1 1275 350 �• 1225 E 1500 1425 1375 not applicaiat, � .•,,,� ..... ..........� ..., ....,_..... .,,:..,... .� ...;.., .,.. -..... ,.,..,.., ,.... .. ,, ., ,�.,..�._, _. .., ,,. . ,.v..�., �. •., . .� :, ...,, , ,.�,,,�,��.. a ..,,.w,>,., „. � , .. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS INTERSECTION_ . 1A G i r=-1 c. j,S2. ._:.tee �.0'�n ' DESIGN H OU,R/YEAR hl- .f .._..._. .� _..��...� i I i i I • . , TRAFFIC U LUME . C Ca S I r , 8s ....14 , , 1: .i i • '.. t „ . : , ' ' ' , , , 38: -,- ,1 :: ' ; : 1 : ..--7-77-7,71:, l'' 1 1` ' ' - ' , : : , „ ,,, : , , , , i asp • , : 9.o , : :1,,,: : ,, , , . ,, : 'i, , : , , , : , „ , :, , , , I • , . ' ' DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES 4 EAST/WEST .10:' 1 ,,.� • I I�r ' NORTH/ ,ITH I� SUM tFRTC�L LANDLES I k, NUMB LLR PHASES : f ' LEVEL CAF SERVICE ',fit, ,, , , : su. of Critical La n a Vol — s 1,6*e of .,Service i'1.ra. PhaSa 'Three Plt,�ase Four, ®r.More Phases '' ' ' A, 900 8551 825. k 1056 1000 965 I C 1200 1140 1100' r, 1 t. • I q/ L ww// 1 5 1 2 Af�5 1+ 5 1375 4 1 11 g -'' not applicable s j 9 I INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS i INTERSECTION •_..*PPe.-! 1 4" r w 4 kJ r B DESIGN HOUR/YEAR . `lY1 ,, ■ as • 1 I � I L TRAFFIC VOLUMES: `y , I , (,41,11, ' . : r . ' : : , , „ r I I :.Ir i ' — T 1 ........ , , , , , , , , ,,3, c.1 uppi„. : , . .0 ip ,, - - . , L : , , , : , , i' , , TiI r_ I N 4 I I ar� N' I I �IL I r CIREC°ION ' L MOVEMENTS CRITICAL LANE VCS .� 1 CRITICA VElV1EIV LLIMES I . : • ,:wrr..; EAS�uvESr I 41- 4 4 S• , Y I e . "H ' ' iSOI.lTH • SUM OF �ITICAL LANE\ L DIES I� F` � Z,I NUMBER OF PHASES, 1 1 I I r L,EVIL OF SERVICE Saof Cr t c l La Volinr Y 9 itvel'Idi ��bi �e Twb.gbss r e Thzr e e P aa �. Feu r ��e Phases I Al 900 855 ' 025 i I ` � 1050 I 1 loon r 965 rcI C 1200 1140 1100 ti 7 1225 r, 1500 1425 1375 r .O Yr :iii. .Ir �® r' Y O �, Poi eD Imo' O s.„ EO u. , tQplcab'1i� go dal�� r 1 t� •.�.. ...r ., ,�. I' .u..rrenrn,„..,•..:.••...,....,.•..•. .. .. vir� ...,r,,,,.... .w , .. ..n ., .w ., ,-..� ..,,. ..,........, I..n, ...:u u.r,.v, ,,, .. ,.e. r s ,..... u ut4..u.. a.r ..,n e.,,' ua_„�r • • INT EA3ECT1ON CAPACITY ANALYSIS INTERSECTION_ '�'��-�F!L I- Lvti }/��/N�% l�► � o,�c� .�11 ��rl�r�4�W -I�r•I�u�r �lyr -.-rlrY�r��l 4�IIr�r�s� . DESIGN HOUR/YEAR •ifv'► r• �. r�.:. -��. ,._.. • . a qp �co C�JI ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES a °z): a ■ . . -� A • DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICA L LANE VOWMES I I EASMT -.� NORTH/SOUTH NI' (7( I •i� �vl SUM OF ITICAL LANE VCLUM S 7 S� CIS 7 NUMBER OF PHASES r i . F SEFIV10E LEVEL `Vr. . ".. -riernriiilo�Irurlrllarlr+ertiioY� Sum of Critical Lane. Volumes Level of Service Ti4ra Phase Three.Phiase. f'nUr. or More Phases •, A 900 85 825 B 1050 1000 955 C 1200 1140 1100`• ;7 130 1 5 125 1500 145 15/5 F not applicable Pp1lcable � �.�'1/46��b I • • • Z( i AY- i i I I .. 'n 0 , • -114 tlo:' • I i • P • • 1 I 1 , r, i UICIS:1:GrvlAL1:yED INTERSECTION CAPACITY I FAAC:G,1 M WORT•<SHEi~E Beef Bend and Fr �rt ap Road ri,, v f )4 D x Frontage F o r1 Date of Count : Existing x x Day of Week: Weekday Time of Dave AM ; `ixxxxxxxx><x )':xx x:S)4 x?:: x Prevailing Speed : 303 ' I . B , : of lanes on major or •it rYeet : 2 I . t"► APPROACH GRADES: t. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A 0 e,E 0%4D 0%x , k. Beef Bend SHARED LANES: 1.. S APPROACH D: none • APPROACH ) > 1 � - tifCS < ' f� 1 ? / } � l < t � 4 { � �5 � j � . � SCCC ( i ( ( {) r } ? , ? )B ( { { 4 ( MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR , CL". CT f�R BL : T, BR • VOLUMES 37 81 0 10 10 i,i >ir 0 0 26 +r! , •, 1 c'C 1•.•I 41 :L :1 11 i. )1 • ,• RIGHT"1 TURN FORM D (DR) . CONFLICTING FLOW . -I- T 86 CAPACITY r57; ` .`1.'' CRITICAL t AP= 8 8EC a I MPED( N�'•E ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY TY 9 f'49 1. 12% 1 M CAPACITY IMPEDANCE CREATED= p 9 3 DEMAND (LOS r ) tt • LEFT TURNS FROM ` w/ CONFLICTING FLOW r R±E r= 8 CAPACITY 1171 , " ' B CR I T l CAL GAP= 4 sEC . I MPELANC" AD JUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1 1, i li CAPACITY USED= 8 5 IMPEDANCE CREATED= . 98 DEMt .ID 0 ,"OS A) 4:1 LEFT TURNS FROM ID (DL) ' ' CONFLICTING FLOW Or+R.1 i "I "I"BL.~+°AL.+A"I... AR+CT+CR= 144 CAPACITY 658 0 CRITICAL GAP= 7. 5SEO. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT== a ADJUSTED CAPACITY 845 CAPACITY USED= 1. 71% I MPEDANCkY CREATED= 9 DEMAND, (LOS=A) 11 t 9 ...:12 , 1 1 , , o li 1 if C I pm' , , r' • Y • 1 UN;:. J:C JNt=11"_,1:ZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET I . Bet.1 Bend I;: td at l''re.-irtt,!.ge Rd. x D. x Frontage Date of Count : Full Develooment •' •' L x x Day of Week Weekday , . ,.. . / Weekday x xi Time of Divp am xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing ; ie ed a ail ' ,, � . i of lanes st re e; I " v A APPROACH GRADES: x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxX y Z74a9 Z%nD 0% - il APPROACH CH D: none , APPROACH ) ) I ) 11 > A< ( i << 4:'<i )'ii ) > > 0 <.< < < < (}"> ) ) > i )Cr,i ( 'ti < ( ('(> > > ) > 1 ? 8 ( < ( ( ; < . MravE t1�1v11" AL AT AR DL I)_t_L DR CL Clr' R rEL :i r i I , V 1O LlJ M f:.' i 41 J.11. Iii 1.001 'Zi 1. 1 lb 171 0 0 35 Ili C H 45 11 1 t I a E , ,... CONFLICTING FLOW . 5E4R+8T= Z5 CAPACITY ?6;. 1 CRITICAL G iP- -S_C , IMPEDANCE A D U S l M N7 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY wa I CAPACITY USED= 1. 84% 1yPED NCE CREATED= a S9 DEMAND (Los.=A) l « jj, . 4 1....F.:.'1:-."T IJ RN a P IOM A (AL) (C NFL I CT I N S FLOW 9R+BT= 35 CAPACITY 1162 1 r1 i T I r L GAP= 5SEC$ IMPEDANCE ADJU; T' EN - 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1168 1' s i CAPACITY USE II= 3. 87% IMPEDANCE PEDANCE l REATED- .:` DEMAND (L.O =A) 45 • , - L_t�I'.,T ,F Lr. NS FR ON D (1ri,,_).. ' CONFLICTING FLOW , L 3 + _ 3L+AL+A 1+A -1iT±C = 18 i CAPACITY �1' • CRITICAL GAP 7 n 53E C. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= $ 97 ADJUSTED CAP-CITY 1598 . . . CAPACITY 3E)= 1. 84% 'IMPEDANCE CREATED= . 99 DEIMAND (1.".OE=A) 11 • I i A LU n I I I • . i . • • • i ,., ,', ' r i I . tS4, 41'. I , I" " N' Lw(« o r, jfi7("r, f i 5h w I f/ RF, - 4 1 • • • • /4-- UiI\I S I l FtiIA1«,.:I:Z r :o INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET ET . Beef Bend Road and Front c to l Road 9M.,. x D x F 1•%ot''Itaf;;1e Rt":fa Drtte of Cot. I'Ii : ,.::,x:1.s I1!q x x Day of Week: Weekday X )< ,r:L f,'1 e: of Day:v n !�' 'I tt N� r� M > X. x 8 . X r `l i; Xx . r 1~f i:L 7'•i o S iJ t»)?1«! u 80 A APPROACH GRADES: j 1 ..• X'X: { ; '> X} x h} ? ) 5 > 7 Xh X , <? X C x } X = C %n� 0%:D 0% ,o BetiE end SHARED LANES: 1 ' I • ' APPROACH D: none , (7f:'I-"I;t.if'1►..;i«•1 ;> > > > > (( << < ( ;> > > >> } > ; 4C <: tt <') r > > > > > c<< (4 { < < <i > > > > > ) Et < < < < < < < , MOVEMENT AL PT AR a:)1... DT DR c:L.. CT LR Sc": 8"i" tJ ,, I:JL.UMI: S 44 ' GO Ji 20 0 4e 0 0 i:+ 0 98 . • P'C:;H,:I 4e3 2 2 Si 1 i RIGHT TURNS -ORM D (DR) ` t,.,ONF'L x c r:i:NU FLOW . Sl: R••I.,L-. r - 93 CAPACITY 686 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1; ADJUSTED CAPACITY 69''' CAPACITY USED== 5 . uS% IMPEDANCE CREATED= . 98 DEMAND f 1 � - ? f: - : R . CAPACITY I ' CONFLICTING FLOW B R-4-8_ = �. -.J.fe,1 Et,, i CRITICAL C APw 5 3 C. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1098 CAPACITY USE ) 4. 37% IMPEDANCE CREATED= . 97 DEMAND (LCw = l) z 4 4 , LEFT TURNS FkCJM D (DL.) i I C,:tOK11::'L:1CT1ISIO FLOW :.. ' ' JI ,��, ;I° »I.lG�,iN » ` -� raL «►>=i�''+N h7-i»U"I`»N:C:I == ;L'':?» CAPACITY 6 2.I,R,,� 1 ,. CRITICAL GAP= 7. 5 EC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT== . ' 7 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 5 90 1: CAPACITY J= ; . � % IMPEDANCE CREATED= p 7 DEMAND ( _ Ca ) >w» I r , ( 1 i d i f, . 4.; . Ir I, 1 f' 1 f, 1 IiIi i l' fl' . I . w ! � f : .m V OM i i I I I e • e d "�8 • il INTERSECTION J\ AL! lEi CAPt C;I TY WORKSHEET' f 1.1 E(-'3e f Bend RI«l; fi , "'I_f r'�;:.�IJ( r d tl ' ix D x Frf:fnt '1 1E Date f:f f Count :n F"!l 1. Development f, ' ' x x Day o f Week: Weekday x x "1";f me e c'r Day: p'1Y1 , . xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Pr,ev4: .i: x ir"Iq Speed N 80 t B . %fl: f',-1 f 1 tit 1'1 e s f„;f 11 major ,'r r^e t:.9 t i P; t� t //y A , , ' i, 'APPROACH ,f 7RADES a xxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><xxxxxk,xx , ' A i %,TB O%'L) 0% .,a .lay»'e ' Bend Rd SHARED LANES: ; . ' (1.'") 1:iRO Cl-1 . it rii.f't"I =, ' , ` • i (.21Pt:IRCACI-1 ) t.i > > 3 ? r > < < < < < < <) > > > >;) > D< < < < < < ') ) > ( ': > > > C • ;> < < < > > > > > > 13 { ( ( ( ( < : tiC3Vt.:,IY1C::rvI' AL ' ()"t.. Al: `L',, DT 'DR . CL CT ' CF Bt. 81 F? , i ' 1H L N•C«. �� '1 ��1 0 liii 1 rl ' Yt i C..1ivII 4� 46 7,,; 0 �:0 0 � wi�� to VI l`' VI 12 r ' 0 1' I: RTfG1'..IT ILifRNS 1'ru1'.'M ID DR) 1 • t_. C C.1N1=L I CT:C NO I`�"l:.CW ' ' rBR+B"I" 12 : ,! ': ', ' ,, : , ,c u:'r c J:'f Y it siq., ." CRITICAL 7 r,.1µ,- 6"�CIMPEDANCE'a A Jus LN T 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 888 C C► pArJ , ,..Y 1.1;$E = 6. 88% I fr1tDC Dr1NCE CREATED= 96 D p /' (L.,0!,;.:8..--(-`:0 r". . ,� I_„I1:I:7.i” TURNS FROM A (r L) 1: 4J1 IF L I C`I'7:teaCi FLOW E(R+ .+"I"= 1'8Z, , C,flI1""i(.: C i"rY' , - i.i.7 , , cRITIcr.L Gi "= wEC:N IM6=' .DANcf''i F D..TL.1?Ei`1`MEN..I_ i ' ', f-"iD3LiSTED C P I , '0 '. • C.,r11..."At..,r S f'IY LI3LI,D= 4.'81% IMPEDANCE CREATED= n r1 DEMAND (LOS 7A) 91 ' - LEFT TURNS FROM I) (DI..,) : r . . CONFLICTING FLOW ER� r+ wt +A 71-�" ��A R�c +W Rw 84 W CAPACITY ' 568'1 : o� CRITICAL C 1 7,f SE C1 T MPE ANCE DJUS` MENT 49 r J13TEJ C PAamI TY J 1 i.', LL11Par::1 TY SET '3. y )r ' I Mit,E.EID A l IC C REA"1.ED 97 t)5M(4riID (L.0:):a;�A) ',::::iii:,, . a , y Y L�", v aJ, iti ` ;rte 1- ti c , A « • S11 3Nf LC Ei INTERSECTION EC r I ON C =� C: " Y WORKSHEET ' Beef Bend Road at Frontage Rd. 1. x I) x E r:'nt pc- Date of Count : Ex I, t ;r.i•`i►a x x Day of Week: Weekday . x x T a.me of. Day: A m . xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx r l....eval ,1.;Lr'Ig w»oeed : 30 d '1: I , . ' 1....i iT or 1 ares on 711a 1I:r" so i''t'?ei; : i" GRADES: Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A 0%De, 0%:D 0% Beef Bend Rd SHARED LANES: it, APPROACH 04 none APPROACH r > > ? > >'> f ( < < < Cr > > >'> r.> > D ( < ( ( <> > > > > > >c ( ( < ( < {) > ) > > > >F ( < ( ( < <'( • • , MOVEMENT AL PT AR DL. DT• DR CL CT CR 8L 8T BR VOLUMES 37 81 0 10 0 10 0 000 0 0 26 0 11 :t 1 IRIGHT TURNS FORM S CONFLICTING:NG FL W 8R+Err= 26 CAPACITY 979 CRITICAL GAP= 6; ECG IMPEDANCE C« JJS f :h " 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 979 CAPACITY Liw ED= 1. 12% I MPl:,,DqNCE CREATED= " t DEMAND t 1ND (1..-OS ) 1 . _. LEFT TlJ I N�aS FROM t (f; . CONFLICTING FLOW OR-1-8T= 86 CAPACITY 1171 CRITICAL Gr1P=, .,,SE ,; IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY CITY r 1 17 w CAPACITY USED= 3. 5/, IMPEDANCE CREATED= t 98 ( »L -A a w L , ' LEFT URNS FROM 'D (01...) 1 CoNF=F'L•.x CT N% FLOW . 58R+8T-1-I: L-1-A1:;+A°f`+AR+C T'+CR= 144 CF1r='F C I TY 658 a a CRITICAL uy"- �u 4 S E d■ IMPEDANCE ADJ US ' r = . 98 Ah T u D CAPACITY "1) 11- CAPACITY USED= 1w 71% IMPEDANCE CREATED=w I = 't�.lam. DEMAND,� x��S 1t i 4:.ti'��>"l`�f�,1.)�- �w �7 �is�i i�s�lJpa',' �;L.L_L_ rf�l? ��.3. 1 1 t • i II' i 04,01,I ,410610 L «1 t'}' «w�"�'1a,�'(,"1 i it 1 ''$»:4.4 'NI1 .• - f „E r r, n, r ( 7 • • Aai / . P d } w e / i UNS.L UNAL I Z E t>. INTERSECTION CAPACITY O i,R.SH,EIM . Site f:-ic.'cEss at Beef EId.nd Rd x t x Site ' �; s Dmt ? o " Co nt Fwl l beveJ : � l %"� )( k Day of Weeki, Weekday' i X ;; !IMP n f Deav;o AM i , xxxxxxXxxxXX Xxxxxx xxxx P e va . i a r d Sdee a l 3 0 . 6 # of lanes on i G 1 o 1'" s t YEa; y � f:: APPROACH GRADES':n l ' :: xxXXx xxHxxx.XxXXx><xxx..x.<xxxxHX A >ZIw%u:'{ I%at) 0% -,So.( E c 1id Rd SHARED L..ANE S u . APPROACH CaH D: none :APPROACH ) ">.) ) ) ) ) A ( ( ( ( ( ( (r...) ) ) ) '> > D < ( ( ( t ( C) ) ) ) ) ).)C ( ( ( C < < <) ) ) ) ) > ) : ( C ( < < < ( • ' MOVEMENT ( L♦ AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR /.,4.1:.. Ew. R ' , ' Vc:JL,uM •S 0 118 171 34 ' 0 2 I ► I ' 0 ill 36 •j r RIGHT TURNS F O R M 0 (DR). , . C ONF L I C:1•T'' Nt' FLOW o 5C k +EIT= 3" . 5 CAPACITY 963 CRITICAL .t h P 6E C d IMPEDANCE Aw u s rYErT 1 ' ADJUSTED CA AC I TY 963 CAPACITY LS D: . 81% I MPE'DANCE CREATED : 1 DEMAND (LI»O a=A) Lai w�l»» � rA :w� ,' LE.E 1 TURNS 1, ROM 0 (DL) , CONFLICTING PLOW u Gad i:4-8 -1- iL.a-AL••-AT-i R4 C T+Crt- 15/. 5 CAPACITY I;'7°Y 645 ' CRITICAL GAP= 7., ;,SEC w IMPEDANCE NCL ADJ USTMEN 7 = i ADJUSTED' CAPACITY 645 CAPACITY UE80= 5.. 74% IMPEDANCE CREATED-= . 96 D 'z'1ANI: (L.;,O;::a A) ;'�3 4' i , . 7 " Y • i, YN ♦ 1 Iwr. Lw.4.�i..f Lu Gam"Y t..!L w. 1� 9:.4r.1 y i C „ 6 i� i b . , 14 Q N o A 11 . 0 u I I . , " .,f LNSC � . 0 zI1°D � vrERsw ) IJrt r..,ff..,,.,fPcI.fff.Y• Wut KbHix..t, 1 , Beef B t 1"i d Road a ,t»lt Frontage. Rd. • x ) x F r .n;a Ge ' Date . Count : .� w t i x x Day ,of Week: Weekday , x x Time : f Dcy n PM xxxxxxxxxxxx ' xxxxxxxxxxxx, Pr�eu i Z �.1�'iI Sdeed �I ;: 0 i' ■ �.' 8 : : 11'f :Lanes on m .7 1r' street ; °r i�4�:11:�I h C AC:::H C�a k( I)i 5: x xx±.xxxxxxxxx�S� xxkxx�xxkxxxx A 0%;8 ►Zi%1D IZi% , k:L Bend Rd , SHARED LANES: y :„APPROACH l)4 i�lhrYia �. 1 ff f { f . APPROACH > > > > > > < 1 < ( < < C)'> > > > D ( < < <� 4 ( <> > >,> > > C < < <: < < < > > >.>) > >8 ( ( < ( ( ( < ': MOVEMENT AL AT >~1R , DL DT ': OR CL CT CR ?L ;t �F 8�� , . 1 'VOLUMES 44 .60: 0 : 20 0 46 ► 0' 0 0 98, �I ', °. PCH 48 � i ti*, f RIGHT TU1 I' S F O I M D (I)I �, , C O N rff . L 4 T, N G FLOW ,',, J E R ? r M 931 CAPACITY ' l t • CRITICAL,AL O(P= bw E 4 . IMPEDANCE DJ UaT MEN = 1 , A J f U S 7 :D CA w af i A C; Tl 896 ' aas �CAPACITY USED= 5. 68%' IM EDA MCE C EjTED n 9.1 DEMAND (LCS ) I: 1 {S �, GlEl°1" TURNS f OM 4 A1. ` . c G:JN l<'L I c°i fps FLOW' 'Lw C 'W B + .�T= 9 , ,P 109 8 „ , IMPEDANCE �CRITICAL CAP= E C. � ADJU3TMCN1t 1 ADT► s Tr CAPi C C1 � L 158 .i . i CAPACITY USED= 4. 87% ' C MPh Nrh., CREATED: „, � � DE( AND (LOw =A 7 ' 48 r LEFT TURNS F I'iO11 I) (I')L) : , : ' � ' , . CAPACITY i'Cl � �L J CT I NG FLOW a 58R+ � " � L - l+" I- � � C� C = ,9 , 0 CRITICAL GAP= 7,a lia., E wa : IMPEDANCE r =ED N )= iZJUS TENT= . 57 . ADJUSTED CAPAC r` 550 I: I . i y cfP c. N Y' US D M 8 8% r irEM aCE CREATED= a 9'7 DEMAND t LDS =A> :� , r F. w I i, b 1 ' 1: , N H , l '' „ R�Sttt FTK'> 'JN,ply ool 64)6J'1 t, f , S„ K r ,f i' y �f q of 11i+J 1:.� '..�.» ��,".3.�r�'�.11,.,' � QF ., ��ti�'r.J 11'k;l�': 1 i �,. , 1 , I, R , ' U\ :BNt . X ZE D C N "E S L" lON CAPACITY WORKSHEET ,` Site Access 8t Beef Bend Rd x t >< E : t e Acce s ' Date : Count : Full Development . of x Day,, of W k C Weekday' . i' x x Time of D)wy,: PIYI xxx><Xxxx><xxX ' XXXXXXX><XXxx ' 1rtr�l va:L i ir,I Coped 30 E *1: of'f° l a rt e s o n CI'i a l+�t r'' $'b,r e e t g W.° . . M ,,, ,APPROACH GRADES!: . XXXXX XXXXX X X XX/XXXXXXXXXXxXX: f 0%:B Q t D l% Beef 806d Rd 4 t?H(=1FE f,) LANL S p ' . , M t - • APPROACH ri: rii: 7"Ir�l " (=1i'�:'.PROACH .>,'> > > )->'> A< < ( ( ( < <> >,> > >,> > D < < < < < <'<> ) >.> > > ) '( ( < < < ( ( <> >)') >'> > 1,� ( < ( < <.< f, MOVEMENT , AL ' AT t*►R DL D"I" IJR CL.' CT CR IL w 'C 1 LiR , . VOLUMES S 104 ►:%I 15 ' i;i 1 ' 0 ' 0 ' j 0 :L r: � "3 3 . ; PCH i H ;1.7 : i . • '. :I RIGHT iH"1 "1"UR NNIS FORM D' (DR) I CONFLICTING 1 LLLIw . x..t^8( 4-L"° = . 158 u' CAPACITY 889 CRITICAL GAP= 6SECm MPE I NCE -b aiS h :N 1 ADJUSTED CAP1 LJ "� 8 "9 v I '1,' CAPACITY ,USED= 18%, IMPEDANCE c Ec "CI = : DEMAND ( " = ) , . ' ' I LEFT TU NS FRC ( ( L ) 1 ',J CONFLICTING FLOW .1it+ET 1 77 , - , : CAPACITY . '',, 1:005 ( "CRITICAL GAP= 5 S w" .M I MP "DANCE tPJ.US,...TNE NT 1 fDJU ED CAPACITY 1005 1 ' � CAPACITY U Et)w ,,I«% I ' ta NCE l EffED= 1 DEMAND (L08=0). u . ► 'LEF i' 1URN8 FROM D �(t L ) ' ' . CONFLICTING FLOW '1 15 E4 R,.1..B T.-1. Lw+fat„+AT 41-1" R-I-Ca`I'` C R 6 i A P( C::;C"I"4` 554'' , , 1 CRITICAL c3AP i. CEC. I MPEIANCE ( DJ US1"MF N"I"= 1 USED IMPEDANCE , ADJUSTED CAPACITY I3L� CAPACITY w 3u 0 %, ' CI E TE )` DEMAND <LOS=i ) 17 ' , V II' , i ' : , ' ' ' : ' ' „ ' , Cp a 1,-d 1 9 Lovt.41, of,I fb t: !,n v i 0 o 0 9ia��. , . r , . , , ... „ , . • • I �1'1=1 1E N J I 1 --4.t 1,nrOi,•e!I lea,,e r-3:40- .1 I .IL4 ) • • • • • • , r I i " 1 • r y • • 0 e o + CALCULATION Of- RE( U I RED S ORAGE ON THE WEST APPROACH OF BULL MT ROAD AT PACIFIC HIGHWAY (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION) > Existing > AM Peak Period > Assumed Cycle length 70 seconds or 51 cycles/hour > Highest 6 minute period during peak hour eauais 17% of peak hour flow. ( 1) > Est irnated traffic demand: 430 v/fit 1 ) Cars served during l on cycle of peak 6 minute period :: 8 v/cycle. (2) > Estimated saturated traffic flow o f two left: turn lanes: 3200 v/h > Cars armorivirya duririp preen phase: 8 X 480/3200 = 1 c/cycie Cars in c ue ue at start of preen: 8-1= 7 cars , > Storage lehnth % eauired: 7 CarKs x 85 ft/car 17.., ft. (3) • 1 (1 ) From field bservat i oirns f vehicles e ca ��be 5et�v i ced. r Y ve�a:c]. s rra s z all��...> AS ,rll1'0 r c, 4 � � (3) St cr"ade to utilizes both lanes. .. i , n (L 3 41=6 3 '• At r • i,,I,. •` 1. •, n • • O . CALCULATION OP.' REQUIRED STORAGE ON THE WEST APPROACH OF BULL MT ROAD AT PACIFIC HIGHWAY . (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION) > Existing i st i ng > PPM Pea k Fier i c'd > Assumed Cycle length 140 seconds or'`' 26 cycles:/hoiir, > Hi: chest 6 minute ,period during beak, hour eaua.Ls 1'7/.l of cueak hour flow. ('1) ) Estimated "a�f ic denaY d: 3 38 , v/h � . d > Cars Served, y' durinu on cycle of peak 6 minute berii_id : 13 v/cy�c1t . (w�) > Estimated saturated ',traffic flow of two' left turn 'lanes:, 3200 v/h > Cars arr"?vi'4'm dur"in gr een phase,: 1'w X 338/3200 = 1 c/cycle }�' g _ c_ cl�e l . . '> Cars in queue at start of a'ryeen. -»13 1= 12 ',cars > Sto:,rage' lenuth required : 12 Cares ' x 25 ft/car= 800 ft., , . FF , (i ) ''r',on field r observaticrs . (2) Ass. nirp. all' vehicles : e h j i ed 1 1(3) Storage to utilizes both l ans. { r i I is 0 1 601+ t I/// ` - , '„n• .. ,,., ..iF.... . .'a• ...,, ria n .. i .. .. ,1....i e,e .a, W., 4 a , e s CALCULATION OF RLQU I RED STORAGE 7,-" ON THE WEST APPROACH OF BULL MT ROAD AT PACIFIC HIGHWAY (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION) ,... > Total Projected Traffic > AM Peak Period . ,. ) Assumed Cycle length 70 seconds or 51 cycles/hour Highest 6 minute period dLtrina peak hour ecuais 17% of beak hour I - flow. ( 1) • > Estimated traffic demand: 48,1 v/h > Cars served during on cycle of peak 6 minute taeriod : 9 v/t=arcle. (2) i t > Estimated saturated traffic flow of two left turn lanes: 3200 v/h . t > Cars arriving during a r»een phase: 9 X 481/3200 -_ 1 c/cvc l e ' • > Cars in o ueue at start of green: 9-1= 8 cars 1, i > Storaae length reauired. 8 Cars x 25 ft/car',L, 200 ft. (3) 'I [f t .{ f f, . . • (1 ) From field observations , . (2) Assuniiria all vehicles tan be serviced. I (3) Storage to utilizes both lanes. I• ' : i '4, 1 t II f ,! 1 ' , • '4 z k WgtiT KORG r i''''"1 L 0031 641,6333 m I 1 r' • CALCULATION O(= REQUIRED STORAGE. .. ON THE WEST APPROACH OF BULL MT ROAD AT PACIFIC HIGHWAY • ' (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION) �� , W > Total Projected Traffic ,' > PM Pea k Period • > Assumed Cycle lena�th 140 seconds or 28 cycles/hour > Highest 6 minute perioo during peak hour eaua1s 17% of beak hour 9 flow, (1) > Estimated t r a f f i c d ernand. 338 v/h > Cars served durirya on cycle of peak 6 minute Deriod : 13 v/cyc1e. (2) > Estimated saturated traffic 'flow. of two left turn lanes: 3$0 v/h , , > Cars arriving during green chase: 13 X 336/3200 = 1 c/cycle `, > Cars in queue at, start of green: 8-1= 7 cars > Storage length reauired : 7 Cars x es ft/car= 175 ft. fay (1 ) From field observations (2) AseuMing all Vehicles can be serviced.' (3) St trade' to utilizes both l aheea �. , a el 11013krhNCH«04,,' a5 641,6403 ' . ti" ' ., r ' 0 i i E ,, r•d Rd ) ' d I 1 i O. • • , i I I I I r I • t 4 r • ‘, 9 n ' .. I , CALCULATION OE- REUU I FED S.,�ORAC E. I ON THE WEST APPROACH OF E4EEF BEND ROAD AT PACIFIC HIGHWAY (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION) r > E x. s i r►a Traffic, > Fief Peak Period 4 > Assumed Cycle ler�ath r1 'seconds �oor Te cycles/'hour, > Highest C ' minuta period durir►ra peak hour, eauais 17% of peak hour I J > st i mat ec traffic demand: 97 v/h � 1 ', 1 ' • > Cars served during on cycle of peak 6 minute period: 'I e. y/cycle. (2) '. .4: > Est ir►iated ' saturated .traffic flow of the left turn- lane: 1800 v/h : ' '.., , ' ' , ) Cars rr°ivy r►a d►.ir^i tl + green . ph se: 2 X 7/16Q = 0 c/c c.l e > i;rams i n a ueue at start' Of preen: 2--0= 2 cars , , ►:�r^ar1e > t 1enoth lireagired ; ' 'Cars x 25 = /carte°-e 50 ftw I I I - I (1) Fr^Or►Y field' 'observat i►:iris . � : ' I ( )' Assurii i ri o all V eh i d 1 es sari he serviced H � }, . 1, I d' �r �4 I r I r " Iu) 'G 1 3 3 �;,. . \ ‘ • -• • , „., i i CALCULATION OP R .� !U I REIN STORAGE 1 • , ON THE WEST APPROACH OF BEEF= BEND ROAD AT PACIFIC HIGHWAY (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION) 1 , L - > Existing Traffic . Period phi beak . 1 > Ass6rned Cycle length 140 seconds or 86 cycled/hour, > Hi©hest 16 minute period d uring ©eak hour'` eauaLs 17% of Peak h:;,;r r f l cw� (1) � > Est irnated traffic, demand:' 80 v/h : > Cars served during on cycle of 'peak, 6 minute Der,jod: v/cycle. (F`) > Estimated saturated traffic flow Of theH., Ieft 'turn bane:. 1.600 v/h . > Cars arriving during, green phase: 3 X 80/1600 =,..' 0 c/cycl >: Cars in a ueue at start hf nreen 3.-0 3 cars > Storapo length rye aired e 3 Cars :Ix 2 5 i:ft/cartItit 7 t . t... : , „ , „ ,„ ., , , ro � 1, ,,, , , „ „ , . ,, , „ ,M ((77 . ( ,,,„, 1 ( i > Fr oM field observat i►;errs (2) Assure i r�a l:l veh i c i es care be serviced. ' �. , c 1 H: 14, +�;:;)14,41.6 j, 1.1 4 •M / ' .. �'` r ' • CALCULATION OF REUU I RED STO RAdE w • ; ON THE WEST APPROACH OF BEEF BEND ROAD AT PACIFIC HIGHWAY (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION) > Total Projected Traffic Peak Period I r Assumed Cycle length 50 seconds or 72 cycles/hour > Highest 6 minute period during peak hour eai.t 1s 17% of caeak hour flow. (1) I I I > Estimated traffic demand: 140 v/h > Cars served during on cycle of peak 6 minute= period : ': v/cycle. (a) > Estimated saturated traffic flow of the left turn lane: 1600 v/h > Cars arriving during preen „phase: 2 X 140/1600 = 0 c/cyc'e > Cars in queue at star"t of green: 2-0= 2 I cars 9 > Storage length ^eouir ed . 2 Cars x 25 ft/car= 1 ft/car= 60 ft. I I I � I M1 I I I I (1 ) From field c+bser Va'tions .. g Iles c. ,, (2) Assuming r all�. va=h i Can be serviced. fi 1 I I i M1 r I 1 • i iteisat , I{toll 641°.4-- , k I _ , ,w CALCULATION OF REOU I RED STORAGE ON THE WEST APPROACH OF BEEF FEND ROAD AT PACIFIC HIGHWAY , 1. (SIGNALIZED INTERSECT ION) ' ' ' > Total Projected Traffic_, 1 > PM Peak, Period . , • : 1 , > Assumed Cycle length ' 140, seconds or 26 cycles/hour > Hiahest ,6 rnihute period during peak hours eaua:ls; 17% of peak hour flC'WN t i'> > Estimated traffic derna. ►d a 9 ' > Cars served dur,inp ►w*r'l' cycle of peak S minute per rod: 4 v/cycled ('2) � ' , > Estimated saturated 1 tr,a f f i c flow 1 o f the left' t ur i lane: 1 i00 v/h - > Cars arriving durina areen phased .4 : X ,, 99/1600 = 0 c/cycle ,� , > Cars i r queue at sst ar t •:'f f it eer'i: 4L-0 4 cars ; tor a e ler�c�th r,,ec�uir^ed: Cars x �ft/carw- 10 ft. 3' 1. I � { 5 E > r t�►r a.a�.dbser vet �r () Aesi.�rt i h a a 1 l' vehicles care be �sery x cer i ' ' ' : I .A �� '�� I I , i , • • • • • • I •,�. mil. `tl/W n �r i l \ I I 1 I I ti � i I r r - -__ - - _ - --_�.�.-_m..sa soa-'.:�v+sa- -.�'% - -•_f _ .....az� ,_=_ _ ms�T `�� '1fl ,J - _ _. o ti! - -----.1.--7172-- •' .._-- --g'-.r.--_..- -._.„.. _------)°-- ____ _ : _ __ _ _, _____ __i __ _ _ _ ________ _ _ _ : , ,,_ _ _,_ ,_ _ _ __-_ --- - , --) _ _...- . 1 _ _ _ _ . ...-_ <, ---''' - '''' -7z-L-27z---,47 -_- - -, _ _ _ - i __ _ r4Fir-- --- __ ___- ;-------7-:.. __ . __ --6,_,--3, i__ _-___ -___-_- :-__ __: ____ i i: O `s ' '----1 - '-("/ -- - -- •:- - -'. _ __ 7/%20 0111 17 1/_<'7 --- 101 ,---.---.:.: - . -: 12 --!- _ yg-,i al IA IP'y _'. - 3,„ 1.40 V.,—,,,„„„..,fr, _-__ ‘ 44 s��_ �d� �i rrrrcr _ /_ _/_ -/,_ /_ , _- --_ \ _- 1 . i i - -- . -\\ _. - I 7_ . -- .-_______ . • . • ! - - .0,"__•_ I -..- Ali 4111, /-__(-_, A\ . ''' . - _ _ -__ -- -- ,_ -_ ,- - '__- P-.14f/ '44_ \---_ _ - _._- I:r-r-1- \ ._,,,v. ./_ _, : ..\...-,..____-...,5 .--- _--__: , „_.__: __ _ ,_ --41b- ._____ ' --7-1i - 440thitini_ • 7 ' __ _ ;-_--i _ _-_. __ _ _____ r__ _ * i : _ - ___ - ----- - - 7- - 44Siii.:0,;44:,,, ,jir",/,? , - - ' 41-•, -''..-./.-- !.- -- - • ggr. - - sil -. , -,___ _ _-_ __ _ - -___ .,- - - _ Ali, -- : ,.---_-- -- re: ..,.; -. - i - _ 411,7 • -_= . -- 'a - - - \ _. - . _ ______ __ _ _ _ _ , -," - AN a_. r) ---1 --- - WI. e.- ■ - - 4 . : .- __Ali IIY _ _ _,_.7 ll.,#,,,,,, __ -- 44 . 7 7. , _j ___--__-, -_, .1 .1. . _ alt , nit --\\ - , 1 AN - A _ -- - - _ _ - _ 7_\ . _ - - *, -- _ - __---/-_yet- .:-.-...---.4.V.' -- 1.,.......... f III, , •. � r n: - F. ,_ _ . ____ _ _i__ __.. --1,--000—% ___..:__7_40r:. -__ _,_ -. :,-; „: _ _-__ i_ 444, I _- 40 „y,,,-) i- . .___ -_ _ 1.:-:• ��pi_ , il: /z.:'-- f(--_ -_-, ___ -_ __ -_ _ , ' _ - , . r ' 7 _ a / yt °• i I� i�. 6 - ea -z Qrl-av'"41'75:rc - .-/''''''''...7- - __7___-.----7- ____>_ .........,..‹< - 4.1.1,..4" -4.4.4....... - - - - - - _ - - / -- .../.'"- -. - ___,,d,ir =o-, --= • -F &ff....iv- .:4--.--: -,--A44.-- - -- ,-_ ----- ._ - . :>'_'<"'--'-. _- - — - ---- - -- - - - - - s iii, C fLL0Gf/' -h Eic%n!� _44Ec/1.f`E5 - 27, YeLq s .__` - _ -- -- - _- - - . rir a Witt 1119Pry 1 1,149 =,.er ^---r*- � :`=s;.'F�`�•�";,-: J�d!-•ca.-�'�.,�.. r,. ,•...-.r . Y� t ,s iT_...� Y'3-.a?-.- litif t _ - _- - _ - - -- - - _ _ - -- _ - - - - - --- - -- - - _ --- - - ate - - - - 55 - G.aP, To V.-A CLEAVE et al [_214 Or Nov.'58] GARBARIITO D.VAN CLEAVE et al 555 4: z - _ Cite as 214 or. 554 F Argued.March 14, affirmed September 24 petition for Asa L Le�velliii Salem,argued-the cause • `-' - rehearing denied November 12, 1953 �' e ease and fired. S a brief for respondents. GARBARIND v. VAN CLEAVE, ET AL Before PERRY, C. ., and PossANs ILcATT•Tsx and 330 P.2d 28 SIlOAN, Justices. Til Suit by owner of_lowland to enjoin owners of upland from AFFIRM v n. using drainage system construct ed by then to drain surf ace water 1 from their lads. The Circuit Courts Marion_CounLy,Val D.Slop r, Mc A T,LISTER, J. J,_ entered decree in favor o�upland owners and lowland owner t �rt 1 ,,- This suit was brought b Ann G-arbarino as lain= r. appealed.. The_S upreru e Court, r:-cMist._, S., held that rule of g evil law regarding surface waters was- established as law of tiff to enjoin Alvin, Luella, Darrell and Audrey Van" Oregon, and uniand owners-hhsd right to install and use system - - • Cleave from using- a drainage system canstructed b to drain surface water from their land into naLtti-az channels even � g y � though they thereby accelerated flow onto Iower lands. -said defendants to drain the surface water from their ned: lands. Plaintiff complained that the system accelerated - - Water and.water courses--Civil law----Surface waters the ROW of water onto her lands and damaged them. ' IiuTe of civil Iaw regarding surface waters is firmly estab- zt. decree was entered in_ favor of defendants from fished.as law of Oregon and landowner has right to turn or expel which plaintiff a peals. �t ` uponIand of an adjacent owner surface water that wor=ld naturally flow there and in such quantities as would na.`urally"drain in such 1?la.in tiff=o wits 43 acres of Tana in the Lake Labish - direction, without liability for damage. district of Marion con-nth a few miles north of Salem. , courses— Waters and Ra p,courses—t wners of sigland—_ fight:o drain snr� Much of plaintiff's tract is in the former bed=of the face waters reclaimed lake and is referred to as beaver-dam land. 2.. Owners. of upland had right to install and use artificial The soil consists principally of decayed wood and vege- - drainage- system- to. dram surface waters from their land onto a lowlands=through natural channels, without liability to lowland table matter,1s light and washes easily. t owner, even though they thereby accelerated flow of water onto The defendants own a tract of upland:in the shape -:`'4 TeIands. F o�_an L, the long side o f which a djoins the east side i Waters and water courses—Drainage o-f surface waters—Erosion of plaintiff's land. ` an of plain • ,n The base of the 'L lies south of plaiutiffss tract but is separated from it by a rec�- ' f 3. In suit by lowland owner to enjoin owners of upland from f using drainage system constructed`.by them to drain surface waters tangular Strip l�iown as the Steusloff proper y. Dui.- from their*rand;.lowland.owner failed to establish by preponder- rug periods of h,lavy"rainfall the surface water from 11,1;' Once of evidence that erosion of land was caused.by an acceleration , F a defendants land naturally flowed into what had been [ _ of flow of surface water rather than from severe winter storms, former lake. i the bed of two arms or inlets of the form . The CJs,=waters §116:- Lwo points at which the water flowed into the former Department .. lake and south boundaries of lake bed were near the east • ,f County.. plaintiff f's property. This flow was by natural channels _ - Appeal f roar.Circuit Court,c,Marion except at one point where the water ran for a way in - D:,r�JLGPERy edge, a ditch alongside a public road. , T e a Winslow,w Selene argued the cause and filed i r g In October 1953, the defendants installed a s•stern pit - $ a brief for appellant.. facilitate the drainage of surface water from their _t_-_-1: - ' , • Noy.'58] G&R.BAR�ND V.VAN CLEAVE et al 557 ; 5'56 __ GnEr�.�vo v.V�CzravE et al [2S4 Or.. " Cite as 244 or. 554 - L y adjacent owner below, provided he does not cause - land The s�aten� consisted of TT�es of clay laid - � _ , P ��. i water to flow on such lands which. but for the { r t= three to five feet beneath Ilia surface.. The tiles were I ,. flowed " _ 4 artificial ditches:-would have in a different laid a quarter of an inch apart and water, after seep- direction, and proYided he acts with a prudent re _ inn through the soii,. entered the 1;i�es through these (t gird for the interests of such adjacent owner: 30 aw - joints. Only after a hard rain for a day or so did Am. & Eng. Enc. of Law (2 ed.j, 337 Angell on ; water rim from the lines. Plaintiff contends that as a Watercourses (6 ed.), p. 122 et sect.; Anderson v. .;# , �� n, ,� Henderson, 121 111. _164, 170 16 HE 232 , Wood rescllt of-the insta le.. iou and use of their drainage v. Moulton, 146 Cal. 317 80 Pac. 92 - Shaw v. _ - system by defendants her land was flooded and eroded _ ' ( '_ • on two occasions during_the winter of 1953-54. Ward., 131 Wis. 61x; (111 N.W. 671, 11-.Anue Cas. .. t 1139)." 1: The rule of flie eivillawregarding surfacewaters In Harbison et ltx. v. City of Hillsboro; 103 Or 257, 1 __ is• now firmly established as the law of Ore .on. - y 3-- - y Oregon. 204 P 6!�, Mr. Justice BEAN discussed-at some length Street v.-Riingsnjer, 108 Or 349, 353; 216 P 1017, the the difference between the rule of the civil law and court said: _ { the common enemy rile, which the_court called the t - `-Thera has:been a great conflict of precedents common law ride: Regarding the right to accelerate - in the United States about whether the comm on- t the flow of surface water_ by artificial means, the __ law rule-or that of the civil law respecting surface opinion concluded as follows: ti waters shall prevail. The question was not defi `C* * * The rule that would best serve in -this- nitel�v settled this state n-til the case of Rehfnss ; v. weeks, 93 Or. 25 (182 Pac. 137), followed by T state,and tQnd to promote the interest of the people_ T Harbison lI sboro, 103=Or. 257 204=Pac. 613 , without_causing-undue hardship, would be to allow- d a err ` in both of which the opinions were written by Mr:- the owner of land to turn ur on the land of an _ x us ce RE . adjacent owner surface -r .r n such quantities as t would naturally drain in that direction by means of _ ;1:A`= Tn ReT f uss v.,'Weeks/ 93 Or 25, 182 P 137, the rule artificial'drainage even though the flow of such " :} = as to surface water and the drainage thereof was stated water upon the lower tract is accelerated, due re- zt f t n'r being observed for the interest of the adjacent 1. yard be' est as follows-:- owner so as to cause no i1nreasonable inconvenience: X-z` "The defendant as a bind. owner,.hail the right -rte, g - Whitney Wh.itne v. Willamette Bridge Ry. Co., 23 Or. 188, `k -� - 1 to turn.or expel upon the land of an adjacent owner, _r 192 (31 Pae. 472)." ,l that would naturally flow there, - -_ _ 'surface water . -and in..snrh quantities as would naturally drain in -_ See also Leven et ?Ix. v. City of Salem, 191-Or 182, �:.' _ such direction,•without.l .ability for damages: .it 1 229 P2d 255 and Wellman et ux. V. Kelley and Harri- ,x -- Willamette_.R._.. :Co., 23 Or.188 (31 Pac.472 ;- 2r neg� 2, . )' sow, 197 Or 553, 252 P2d 816. _ �t If Davis v.,Fry,14-OM. 340 (78 Pac. 180, Aim. Cas. ,1 _ - '-:: �4:- The- 193, 69 L.R.A. 460) 5 l -.B.• §469, p. 354. 2. Under the foregoing rule the defendants had the owner of upper lands is--not prohibited by the rule right to install and use a system to drain the surface fil,1 from cultivating= his lands- or draining them b; a ✓ r water from their lands_ into natural channels even 1 _ - artificial ditches, though surface water is thereby t=' though they thereby accelerated the now of water onto - r precipitated more rapidly upon the lands of the g y y - p - p p y p i — —� ---,-..--,-,-..-•.. . ..`— _ ._.�. _ ...�.-' ^r ----- •-�_ - " +:.icy..+✓ , --- .... ' .?-.•..5: ,, •-•Sx.:- -�i' • _.•'a• ,._. -". "" - - - - -- -- - i 558 G rra�__ �r C�z��vr et al [N1 Or. Nov.'58] GNU o V.VAN CLEAVE et al 559 � " } Cite as 214 Or. 554 13 the lower lands of plaintiff. The plaintiff does not any alteration in the natural flow of surface water. t` _ allege and there is no evidence to prove that defend- Any right or privilege to a lter_ the natural flow of such k - ants'dr 1 age system caused water to flow onto plain- water b artificial means has been granted by nodifi ' , - tiff's land that otherwise would_ have flowed in a cation or qualification of the civil law rule and the different direction. Plaintiff does not allege that de-g f qualifying rules are not uniform. It is not true, as said ME fendants changed the lace where the surface water i t- g p in Levee et ikx.v.City of Salem,supra,that most of the F from their property naturally flowed onto plaintiff's 1.41=.�� property courts of this conntly have adopted the rule of the civil lands. The complaint does allege that defendants law governing surface waters. It is clear,however,that � . collected and accumulated large quantities of surface ) - by the great weight of authority 4 I I water- and greatly accelerated the flow hereof. The g g in those jurisdictions I �s , rr . which have adopted the civil law rule, the owner of the wards collected' ant acenmulated were: not meant ..,tt upper land may accelerate the flow of surface water by a n to charge than defendants impounded any water by a i �� such drainage system as may be required by good hus- {`1- dam or in a reservoir and thereafter discharged such bandry,without liability for damages to the owner of r : water onto plaintiff's land. There was no evidence of f �� an-v- such impoundage. On the contrary, defendants' the lower lands if the water is not diverted from its _:�� t F natural channels. III Farnham Waters and Water drainage system was designed to and did hasten the ` Rights, §803, p 2620 and 24 Minn LB 891 and. cases e t flow of surface water in the same drainways and chap- -:- eels along which It had flo yved onto plaintiff's lands cited in notes 146 to 100. Our prior decisions appear to l be in accord with this weight of authority. See.-nder= 1 -' prior to the construction of the drainage system. son v.Henderson,124 Tll 164,170,16 NE 232 cited in the [IF- ' Plan ut"ff concedes that Oregon has adopted the Rehfuss case, and the following from Smurr on Farm .� civil law rule as to surface water and that defendants Drainage §3, p 2, which was quoted with 11approval in Litti_f have a right to drain their lands and in so doing to the Harbison case: J=- : accelerate the-flow of surface water onto plaintiff's r,* * �� =' That is the owner of_the higher tract of - laird. Plaintiff contends however,that defendants may land has the right to have the surface-water flowing MN. exercise this right only if they can do so without sub- t or coming naturally upon his premises by rains or }" :_ stantially or "materially" damaging the lower lands. - _ melting snows pass off the same through the natural l This would imply that defendants can cause damage by channels upon or over the lower or servl ent estate, _ :. accelerating the flow of water orovidecl the. damage and the owner of the dominant heritage may make such drains and ditches for agricultural purposes " g p p does_not reach substantial proportions. We have been his ;5. on ms ow�i lands as may be required by good hus- E- •hil cited. to. no case in which the law regarding surface bandry, although by so doin the flow o f water ma � water has been so defined.. The opinions ofliis court be increased in the natural channels w hich carry • do not measure the right or privilege by the extent of the water from the upper to the lower fields; and Eri the damage.. no one has the right to complain that the volume km of water in its natural channels is increased by the It should be noted that the civil law rule as adopted 01 rtzficiat drainage of lands-which naturally drain " r C e .i- �t originally by the courts of this count i-y did not permit therein." (Italics supplied}. r z a = Illi 3K < - - _ -- 1- - - - ,- _ T - --.rT y,G.w-Yew—... _ ,a-..YN'S.::u • r_°i,s.'L` !Pea_,:..'• ?"`h- ,--a..l.r".k'•P^' :a_— _ .-�'r'•a _—t"�-_::-^S:. r-..—w`+.+"F�``!. - --_- --- - - _ _ - - - i - - -_ - i 5 o G o CLEAVE et al L� - Or. a Nov. 5 T � �. 1 G-�xsgr�,rr o V.VAN Czr�avr et al_ 56.1_ - Plaintiff relies on Levene et 2s , v. City of Salem, : __ _ case and the conduct of the defendants in the case at supra. Tn that case the=oily, b constructing ditches -� P g= g bar. There is no charge that these defendants diverted e and laying tile, had �. aying , d Large Quantities of water from its natural channels,concentrated the flow it". T water into a natural watercourse iunedatelg.above a thereof and discharged it onto plaintiff's lands at a point where the stream had in effect been dammed by place where otherwise it would not have flowed. 2.- ° the construction of the-Pacific highway. Lines of tile Plaintiff . in tiff also relies=in a large part on language + -< - - had. be en laid unrter the highway A-rough which the g contained in the opinion in the Rehfuss case stating r�. 9 -wwatercourse flowed without thout difficulty even cd- ring the. ' i' stating - .�: � that a landowner may by draining his land accelerate �. - rai however- t ' s .. lines_ � . j not large enough, ;. rainy- seasons. These were no . the flog of surface water "provided he acts with a • ill o _accommodate to additional water cow x• centratocl by the city discharged_ into the stream_ prudent regard for the interests of such adjacent In the Harbison case,Mr.Justice BEAN am is4� immediately above the highway fill. Some of this addi- I` owner." p _ __ t= led the phrase to read as follows: "due regard.being _ (zonal water had not theretofore flowed in this water- g ¢ " observed fo-r=the interest of the adjacent owner so as �' course.- As a result of the city's action,.water collected to cause no unreasonable inconvenience." The.same ' - above the highway during heavy rainstorms,.the strew.in ir-'''` g g , r -. proviso was again restated iu slightly different lan overflowed.its'banks and flooded the basement of lam tiff=s building., gunge in the Levene case. None of the opinions give 1 - kY a clue as to the exact meaning of this language or the - : b w� fen=d nothing ix the Levene case helpful to extent of the Limitation, if any, imposed thereby on I,- -: plaintiff.. As poird ed out above, that case involved the the right of the upland owner to accelerate the natural Ott- ' discharge- (If a concentration o f surface water into a flow of surface water. natural watercourse.. Although watercourses are r., t g The "prudent regE expressions would seem to j.7.---,--,it natural drains,:=they are governed by the rules relating t be more _consonant to watercourses and not by those relating to the drain- _ with the reasonable use rule re- y g garding surface waters adopted by the Restatement ,.-�- age-of surface water from..private lands. Some_of the _ �m � �^_,� . Torts,§833 p 269) than with either the common enemy .3"_ rules governing drainage are the same as those overn= F y = g - rule or the rule of the=civil law. The expression as kt-•"ing watercourses and some are differen-. -Uncertain ty t -,• p { used m our decisions may be an admonition in general i has-sometimes resulted from treating the drainage of g terms against damaging the lower owner by changing i mace water i the same class as watercourses Seeg III ,rr� any on 1�V aters and Watercourses atercourses 2697, 925: - the place at which surface waters are discharged onto I, - hi -' s land or by concentrating into one place the flow of _ Thompson on.Real Property (perlrz ed): 649 p 286.. I water that would naturally flow onto the lower land ; z As pointed. out in the Levene case, it involved the t in a more diffused form. 'Whether they intended to ;ii Al, "casting of an increased volume of water into the mean a that or something more or Less, we need not ;Ft watercourse crossing plaintiffs premises,. wi hout decide in this case. There may be circumstances . = - rci stances under • 97 3 there being an adequate outlet therefor.. There is no which the extraordinary acceleration of the flow of y-'i - si nilariL.y between the conduct of the city in.the Levene 1 surface water in its natural channels may be enjoined. ,, Vii - . K. f Th. _ _a?x.sc =.7 r. ==41 •:s-,-, ?-?r - y 0 5622 G��o 11 VAN CLEAVE-et Y1 et al [214 Or. ' - ;,-3 3 k ' [ Nov. X81 TT.S.I�:�T.B��r.�ulss et al 563- :: Since there is no evidence of any such extraordinary Argued March 12,affirmed November 13,1958 ', cireum to ces_im this_case, we need not consider that r _ 'UNITED STATES NATIONAT, BANK V. - = question at-this time- 3.. The decree enured in the trial court contained_a GUISS ET . — 331 P.2d 865 ° r - - general finding for the def¢ndauts. and dismissed_ the - ' f . suit T�� lower court apparently concluded, and we fiction for declarato ry judgment se.mng construction of deeds - -��r_ relating to property on which lodge had built a meeting hall. # . 1 think properly;=that DI iintiff failed to establish by a -� � gr g From adverse judgment of the. Circuit court, Marion County, - - er -- h" t f. e erosion of her George R.Duncan,T. heirs .' - prepond.,,an°ce of the evidence �a�u , rs of alleged owner of property appealed. R. -.- Iand was caused by an acceleration in.the flow of sur- The Supreme Court, Warner, �, held that where land on which- _ lodge had constructed a meeting halt from moneys which build- , . face :V ater' and not from severe winner storms. It ing committee had borrowed on their own credit was-.conveyed - - would serve no Turpose to e Lend this opinion by a by owner in trust to his son, who was a member of building ' committee, pursuant to a deed which provided that upon_dis- ' - = detailed. consideration o the evidence. It was clearly charge of construction costs lot and building should be conveyed to 4 __ established that there were extended periods of un- c lodge-but that if costs were not discharged within a reasonable , $-- : usually heavy= precipitation during the winter. The i time as fixed by grantee that after six months' notice of time - & �, t saXed grantee should have the power to sell property and pay complaint itself alleges that the erosion of plaintiff's � remainder, if any, after discharge of costs to lodge, and property °i cc - E had not been sold, ar.d such deed was not recorded and trustee ' lands was caused -"during:times_of heavy storm_dar - x n kept it a secret for nearly eight years during which time trustee ` - . the�inter=of 1953-54 It appeared fiom the evidence p contributed to fats a impression which lodge had as to its owner- , li that_during January the rainfall was 9.9 inches as ship of property, deed executed about eight years later under r-K' t which lodge purchased top floor of building for amount sufficient 4=q_-compared ared to tile, nom for that-month or 5.72 inches. � to discharge balance remaining on original cost of building was q W3 2.04 inches fell dur ng one 24 hour period.late III.Janu- e void, and lodge was not estopped from challenging recitals in latter deed that notice was given. -'_: art It also appears that erosion of the former lake _ { T Affirmed. = bed is not unusual wring° winters of heavy rainfall. ` -- 911175 evidence illustrates the nature of the factual prob- Trusts Building for business--Lodge-Trustee to convey—Income - gib=_ - Iem presented by the case. Even viewed in a light most from. building—Duty of trustee - L Where two story,brick.building with r ental nr its for busi-_. _ p- leaves considerable E ness ur purposes on first floor was bu It b lodge- from moneys I ` doubtao l=aln ,.the evidence�e p p g the defendaIlts by the installation or use # which building committee borrowed on their ow n°credit and, '� thereafter land on which building was constructed was conveyed -1. of their drainage system contributed in an y material by owner to his son, who was a member of committee,=in trust - degree to the flood aid erosion of plailliiff's lands.- by a deed which directed trustee to convey property to lodge whenever it paid indebtedness for building cost but that if lodge g Affirm" e d failed to pay such costs trustee was directed to sell=property, , _ -. liquidate construction debt and pay remainder, if-any, to lodge,. i no part of income from building accrued to p g personal benefit of'' - it---*-- ' 1 trustee and it was his duty,after deducting therefrom maintenance, 4- =sit m insurance, tax and assessment charges,to apply balance to reduc- li t - ti_on of unpaid construction costs. s '. _-- i *In complaint, subsequent pleadings and briefs, plaintiff-respondent . erroneously described as "United States National Bank of Portland, Ore- l-"- whereas, pleadings indicate that the bank appeared gon," whet , only in. its _ - , representative capacity as executor of P. W. Settlemier's will. ' �~ {. x- I . _ _ °r_ --•