Loading...
Correspondence • IM `R • ''. r: FR „/„.22, CONSULTING�- ENGINEERS 11 August 1995 Tim R. Froelich, P E Principal Faramarz Dindar- AzimT, P.E Ms. Janette Herman Associate Northwest Landscape Industries Steven J Entenman, PE 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Associate Douglas B. Schwarz, P E Tigard, OR 97224 Associate Corina Mann RE: Structural Review of the 12' x 56' Modular Jobsite Office (circa 1983) Design Engineer 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Aaron Johnson CADD LuAnn Hawley Office Manager Dear Ms. Herman: Further to your request, we have completed our review of the pre - manufactured building used as a mobile jobsite office located in the yard at NW Landscape Industries. It is our understanding that there are no existing drawings or other documentation. We visited the structure twice, as you know, to gather the appropriate information needed to complete our structural review. We have included in this letter report, a description of the basic structural systems, a synopsis of our review findings and a basic conclusion statement regarding the mobile office building. We base all our comments in this letter report on our site observations. Our structural review was founded on the following criteria: Roof Live Load = 25 psf Floor Live Load = 50 psf Wind Velocity = 80 mph, Exposure B 1 Seismic Zone = 3 CALIFORNIA OBSERVATIONS 1990 The Alameda San Jose, California 95120 408 985 -1848 The existing mobile office structure is a 12' wide x 56' long pre - manufactured building. Tr z designation on the unit includes a VIN 30R5OFMIC27N, with a Commercial Coach CENTRAL OREGON 141 SE 3rd marking. - Bend, Oregon 97709 - 503 383 -1828 Basic wood frame construction (2 x 4 studs at 16" o /c) was used for the wall framing. MAIN OFFICE Plywood sheathing was installed at the exterior walls and roof. Roof framing was noted to L O 325 s we BoonOes regon Ferl Road 97035 be pre - fabricated trusses at 16" o/c and directly align with the studs in the sidewalls below. FAX 503 630 -068 Typical metal siding and roof panels clad the exterior. See Figure 1 included at the end of this letter report. The floor framing system includes two main stringers running the length of the structure that are supported by CMU blocks at 8 feet center to center. Three holddown bands and screw anchors are located along each stringer to stabilize the structure for lateral loading. Floor joists span from stringer to stringer supporting the plywood floor decking. SYNOPSIS OF OUR REVIEW FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION A gravity load and lateral load analysis was performed on the office structure based on the above mentioned design criteria. Our finding indicate the existing structure to be adequate for the use for which it is intended. Refer to the structural calculations included at the end of this letter report. The roof is framed with light roof trusses typical in residential construction excepting for the chords were noted to be 2 x 2 members. We did not have the opportunity to survey all the connections, members, and details required to analyze the truss design which was outside the scope of our review. It is our understanding that the structure has been in use for at least 12 years and has been loaded with typical snow loads during that time. We did not observe any evidence of structural distress from under- design or over -load. On that basis, it is our opinion that the existing roof framing is adequate and will continue to be satisfactory for the useful life of the structure. As noted above, we have found the structure of the building to be satisfactory for the design required by the current Uniform Building Code. We foresee that the building structure will continue to perform as intended. We trust that the information and continent included herein is satisfactory for your present needs. If you have any questions or if we can be of additional service, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, FROELICH CONSULTING ENGINEERS PROFF G N F � -�- I q ty � � ?% Cc 12,320 Steven J. Entenman, PE OREGON A(< G < Y 15, �� ‘NP F N J. E N ‘ end. '' • -----7C 1 16325 5W Boones Fcr!., F CLIENT NO fzT 1.-1144 ySGgPe- PAGE / :■ .• • �i T Q '_'•, Lake OsweRc c;ri:'; T I M I% . 503 636 -0784 lb aROJ ECT AAA C7 4.44,4,4Z., OFfl G� 'FROELICH FAX 503 636 -06:5 f" o ROJECT NUMBER 5e:),. 0 _ p CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC DA, E 14- a&c. 15 Fl sze.- ( E BY eVJ e.. 12 -0 ± METAL laxF rAtJE LS tom. 61-1-04-ONIG• � ...\___ RAF • WAU_ - STuvety ) +i = c W.644. SAN i uco T`ir- 7 METAL WALL A�JELS P / F . FLoc‹. \ r / / N�i� STQwc P v tawnl maimmiwii x - FO ■AN+J'AT1on1 ti ti r C.1z,Ew ANC -40eS "� T U c 2,6-1_ c.-"1 c)(4 - No Sc'ctt..e. -- -- - - - 0q3- o a7 - - jl /6o t 2 Z a avr�o )1n11-7-'93 P .IIN .. V4C 4 > 4.*:,::-'.. om- u ` ,, . TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE i '° .,,' ; AND c z ' BEAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT .t., J ,- 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive • P.O. Box 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076 • (503) 526 -2469 • FAX 526 -2538 -, RF & RES October 29, 1993 Randy Russell Design 9200 S.E. Rodlun Road Gresham, Oregon 97080 Re: Conference Room Addition Northwest Landscaping 16075 S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Rd. 6290B- 056 -000 Gentlemen: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other local ordinances and regulations. Plans are conditionally approved subject to Tigard Building Department requirements and the following items: 1. The tenant space number must be prominently displayed on the street front where it is readily visible to drivers and officers of responding fire apparatus and other emergency vehicles. UFC Sec. 10.208 . 2. Not less than one (1) approved fire extinguisher(s) with a rating of not less than ( *) shall be provided for each ( * *) square foot of floor area or fraction thereof. The travel distance to an extinguisher from any portion of the building, shall not exceed 75 feet. UFC Sec. 10.303 ( *) - 2A10B: C - Light and Ordinary Hazard 4A10B:C - Extra Hazard ( * *) 3,000 - Light Hazard 1,500 - Ordinary Hazard 1,000 - Extra Hazard "Working" Smoke Detectors Save Lives Randy Russell Design October 29, 1993 Page 2 Note: Where flammable or combustible liquids are used, "B" ratings of extinguishers may need to be higher and travel distances shorter. See requirements in National Fire Protection Association Standard 10 -1. Approval of submitted plans is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office or of non- compliance with any applicable regulations of local government. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 5224609. , Sincerely, •U3(31/41 Bradley N. Wanamaker Deputy Fire Marshal BNW:kw cc: City of Tigard Building Department r 1 644, 93- a E( /6075 September 17, 1993 Mr. Victor Adonri City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Victor, Northwest Landscaping Industries (NLI) seeks to erect a 20 foot by 27 foot addition to serve as a conference room. At present the lunch room is utilized for employee meetings and conferences. This is not convenient or comfortable, therefore, NLI proposes the addition to meet its employee and business needs. It is maintained that this is a minor modification for the following reasons: 1) It is a commercial activity and does not affect residential density or development. 2) Does not affect ratio or types of dwelling units. 3) It is an internal company change and will not require additional on -site parking, which there exists an abundance of at present. 4) The addition is designed to match the existing structure, being of the same construction and appearance. 5) The addition matches the height of the existing structure with an uninterrupted roof line. 6) No changes in the type and location of accessways and parking areas will be required. 7) The function of the addition is internal to the company and requires no increase in vehicular traffic. 8) The floor area of the existing structure is 22,400 square feet and - the floor area of the addition is 562 square feet, less than 10% of the existing area and less than 5,000 square feet. • Page Two In general, the addition matches the existing building and is screened from the street by a cedar fence, trees and landscaping. The construction of the addition does not require the removal of trees or the demolition of any existing structure. For thesest reasons we ask that this proposal be considered a minor modification. Sincerely, Randy Russell Representing NLI RJR /kh cc: Diedra Conway