Loading...
Report ii • Main Office Solon Office Bend Ogee Carlson Testing, Inc. 84305'4ll raker TiBan( OR 97223 4060 !Nelson Si, NE 63025 O87 Salem. el 97 Bend, OR 977701 Phone; (503) 684 -3460 Phone. (503) 589-1251 Phone (541)330-9155 F., /1037684-0954 Far; (MI 189-7309 Far (54/1330 -9/6f Construction Materials Testing & Inspection Special Inspection FINAL SUMMARY LETTER March 13, 2008 T0705424 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 -8199 Attn: Building Department Re: Harris McMonagle Associates — New Office Building 8740 SW Scoffins Street — Tigard, OR Permit # BUP2006 -00493 Dear Sir or Madam: This is to certify that in accordance with Section 1704.1.2 of the International Building Code, we have performed special inspection of the following item(s) per our inspection reports only: • Reinforced Concrete All inspections and tests were performed and reported according to the requirements of Project Documents and, to the best of our knowledge, the work was in conformance with the approved plans and specifications, approved change orders and applicable workmanship provisions of the State Building Code and Standards, as well as the structural engineer's design changes, approvals and verbal instructions. Our reports pertain to the material tested /inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTING, INC. • even W. Le ch Project Manager SWUjn cc: Harris McMonagle Associates — Bill McMonagle Nicoli Engineering Inc. — Jim Andrews MH Construction — Lloyd Henderson N Main Office .:lem Office Bend Office P.O. Box 23814 4060 Hudson Ave., NE P.O. Box 7918 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Salem, Oregon 97301 Bend, Oregon 97708 C arlson Testing Inc. Phone (503) 684 -3460 Phone (503) 589 -1252 Phone (541) 330 -9155 Fax (503) 684 -0954 Fax (503) 589 -1309 Fax (541) 330 -9163 Daily Report of Reinforced Concrete Client: HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOCIATES - BILL MCMONAGLE Project: HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOCIATES - NEW OFFICE BUILDING CTI Job #: T0705424 . Address: 8 SW SCOFFINS STREET TIGARD OR Jurisdiction: TIGARD CTI representative S . FOX OBOA 177 was on site this date Sep. 27, 2007 to perform Special Inspection for: Permit BUP2006 -00493 DFS #(s) PO Number: SCOPE OF INSPECTION CONCRETE 1. Checked in with superintendent or client representative. 1. Mix Design approved? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A Name: MARLIN Company: M H CONSTRUCTION 2. Monitored loads arriving at job site for correct: Mix #: 2. Type of work: El Concrete © Reinforcing Slump % Air 3. Work included: ❑ Sampling © Inspection 3. Type of samples made? N/A 4. Inspection was 'IBC' ❑ Continuous © Periodic Number of sets Samples per set 5. Work performed: ® In the field 0 At precast shop 4. Inspected placing and consolidation of approx. cubic yards of concrete. REINFORCING Yes No N/A Location of concrete placement [to include grid lines, elevations 1. Reviewed previous inspection reports? x (floors) and drawing details]: 2. Forms clear of debris? X 3. Type, grade, size, quantity, spacing and X (NO CONCRETE PLACED THIS DATE.) condition conform? 4. Verified forms will nominally result in hardened concrete of the required X cross - sectional dimensions. 5. Verified location of reinforcing steel, pipes, conduits and sleeves with respect to X minimum concrete cover. 6. Verified type and location of splices, length X After samples are tested, results will follow on break report. of contact laps, and min. diameter of bends. 7. Verified support & anchorage of reinforcing REPORT SUMMARY steel in the forms. X 1. Work inspected was: El Completed ® In progress 8. Verified structural embedments in the forms x 2. Work inspected in progress with regard to fabrication, quality and type. 9. Verified structrual embedments in the forms El Approved plans and specifications El Shop drawings with regard to weld inspection, quantity, and X J RFI 0 Design change 0 Submittal ® N/A permits issued. 10. Verified cast in place anchors. X Document #(s) Dated: Description of structure inspected [to include grid lines, 3. Noncompliance item(s) were noted this date, details on elevations (floors) and drawing details]: following page(s). El Yes El No © N/A ARRIVED FOR REBAR INPSECTION FOR SLAB -ON- GRADE. 4. Noncompliance item(s) were reinspected this date, details CONTRACTOR NOT READY. on following page(s). El Yes El No © N/A Conform ❑ Remain in progress SPOKE WITH JIM ANDREWS OF NICOLI ENGINEERING WHO SAID NO SPECIAL INSPECTION OR TESTING IS NEEDED. Report(s) findings were discussed and left with of Based on the Code, approval is required from the Building Official before the SPECIAL INSPECTED items noted above can be covered. Carlson Testing has no authority to direct work of contractors or subcontractors. El See additional report page(s). 0 Distribute attachments. Page 1 of Daily Report of Reinforced Concret. For: 09/27/2007 CTI Job #: T0705424 . Project: HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOCIATES - NEW OFFICE BUILDING Notes: In some cases more than one box may be checked for a given item on the front page. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTING, INC. Reviewed By: Steven W Leach Review Date: 10/02/2007 SF /SB CC: HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOCIATES - BILL MCMONAGLE CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING DIVISION NICOLI ENGINEERING INC - JIM ANDREWS MH CONSTRUCTION - LLOYD HENDERSON 1 A ..1.4 Main Office ;m Office Bend Office s P.O. Box 23814 4061, _-adson Ave., NE P.O. Box 7918 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Salem, Oregon 97301 Bend, Oregon 97708 Carlson Testing, Inc. Phone (503) 684 -3460 Phone (503) 589 -1252 Phone (541) 330 -9155 Fax (503) 684 -0954 Fax (503) 589 -1309 Fax (541) 330 -9163 Daily Report of Reinforced Concrete Project: M,4, --Ii ,-L M i' 41 Jc /4$S'C . -. /%cv C2- - Address: 7 ( Q� i s L CTI Job #: • t o 7e. `s "Lf c { CTI representative 1�.�)c — E f -7 was on site this date l ' Z---.7- 0 7 to perform (Inspector Name & Cert. No.) Special Inspection for ) 1,71 permit ❑ DFS #(s) r8CLi c=1" — oc.: 9 3 jurisdiction In some cases more than one box may be checked for a given item. SCOPE OF INSPECTION CONCRETE 1. Checked in with superintepdent or client representative. 1. Mix Design approved? ID Yes ID No N/A Name: j't �� i c � Company: !j V Ce'r 1cS!'' 2. Monitored loads arriving at job site for correct: Type of work: Concrete Mix #: .---. 2. T yp ❑ �% Reinforcing Slump % Air ' ^--. 3. Work included: ❑ Sampling I* Inspection 3. Type of samples made? 4. Inspection was "IBC" 0 Continuous , Periodic Number of sets Samples per set 5. Work performed: L IZ In the field ❑ At precast shop 4. Inspected placing and consolidation of approx. Shop name: /'tom cubic yards of concrete. 6. If shop inspection do they have ❑ Yes ❑ No Location of concrete placement [ to include grid lines, elevations fabrication and QC procedures? (floors) and drawing details]: g REINFORCING Yes No N/A 1. Reviewed previous inspection reports? i . .. &.. • v .._ !, _ , 2. Forms clear of debris? 3. Type, grade, size, quantity, spacing and condition conform? C1 ' J 4. Verified forms will nominally result in hardened concre • i of the required cross - sectional dimensions. 5. Verified location of reinforcing steel, pipes, conduits and 1 w sleeves with respect to minimum concrete cover. v, After sa t � . —. •• o ow on break report. 6. Verified type and location of splices, length of contact !�' REPORT SUMMARY laps, and min. diameter of bends. 7. Verified support & anchorage of reinforcing steel in the 1. ork inspected was: El Completed ❑ In .rogress forms. 2. Co •leted work inspected 0 was . was not 8. Verified structural embedments in the forms with regard in coma •ante with to fabrication, quality and type. X 9. Verified structural embedments in the forms with regard u El Appro d plans and specifications Shop drawings to weld inspection, quantity, and permits issued. / _ ❑ RFI In Design change II ubmittal ❑ N/A 10. Verified cast in place anchors. X - ( Document #(s) Dated: Description of structure inspected [to include grid lines, 3. Noncompliance item(s ere not d this date, details on elevations ( flgors) and drawing details]: following page(s). 11 ' e I: No ❑ N/A - ,mac C � � �` z l� Zc' '' f 4. Noncompliance item(s) w e re' . spected this date, details 2 e 14 _ ew �vz-.4 �P'�� war- on following page(s). ❑ Yes 12 No El N/A �`/ ❑ Conform M Remain in progres r , d .4-€ ..# Report(s) findin were discussed and left with Ik e e t— ;1 i v .4.,�;, 5 , ,A, ), 0 a. ; � 1 n 40 .. .. c - . — _ - • o f Based on the Code, approval is required from the Building Official before the SPECIAL INSPECTED items noted above can be covered. Carlson Testing has no authority to direct work of o tractors or subcontract. Inspector Signature: 7 . Page of ❑ See additional report page(s). ❑ Distribute attachments. Ver. 2 Recon 04/20/2006 • Terms: Client recognizes that construction observation and/or testing services provided by CTI are techniques which may reduce the risk of construction defects, deficiencies, or omissions arising during or after con- struction. Services performed by CTI do not constitute a warranty or guarantee of any type. Even with diligent construction monitoring and /or testing by CTI, construction defects, deficiencies, or omissions in the Contractor's work may exist. In all cases, Client and /or the Contractor shall assign the Contractor the responsibility for the quality and completeness of the work and for adhering to plans and specifica- tions. CTI's work or failure to perform same shall not in any way excuse any contractor, subcontractor, or supplier from performance of its work in accordance with the contract documents. CTI. will provide its professional services to Client with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by members of its profession. This representation is in lieu of other warran- ty or representation, either expressed or implied. It is also understood and agreed that statements made in CTI reports are observations based on technical judgments, and should not be construed to be con - dusive representations of fact. If conditions different from what are indicated in the reports come to Client's attention after receipt of the reports, it is recommended that Client contact CTI immediately to authorize further appropriate evaluation. CTI's work shall not include determining, supervising or implementing the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction. CTI shall not be responsible for evaluating or reporting job con- ditions related to health, safety or welfare. • • } F- G Main Office ..lem Office Bend Office 41 P.O. Box 23814 4060 Hudson Ave., NE P.O. Box 7918 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Salem, Oregon 97301 Bend, Oregon 97708 Carlson Testing, Inc• Phone Fax (503) 684 09540 Phone 589-1309 Phone Fax (541) 330-9163 5 Daily Report of Reinforced Concrete Client: HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOCIATES - BILL MCMONAGLE Project: HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOCIATES - NEW OFFICE BUILDING CTI Job #: T0705424. Address: 8 SW SCOFFINS STREET TIGARD OR Jurisdiction: TIGARD CTI representative STEVEN W. LEACH OBOA 243 was on site this date Aug. 28, 2007 to perform Special Inspection for: Permit BUP2006 -00493 DFS #(s) PO Number: SCOPE OF INSPECTION CONCRETE 1. Checked in with superintendent or client representative. 1. Mix Design approved? ❑ Yes 0 No © N/A Name: LLOYD Com an MH CONSTRUCTION 2. Monitored loads arriving at job site for correct: P y Mix #: 2. Type of work: 0 Concrete © Reinforcing Slump % Air 3. Work included: 0 Sampling © Inspection 3. Type of samples made? N/A 4. Inspection was 'IBC' 0 Continuous © Periodic Number of sets Samples per set 5. Work performed: © In the field 0 At precast shop 4. Inspected placing and consolidation of approx. cubic yards of concrete. REINFORCING Yes No N/A Location of concrete placement [to include grid lines, elevations (floors) and drawing details]: 1. Reviewed previous inspection reports? x 2. Forms clear of debris? x 3. Type, grade, size, quantity, spacing and x condition conform? 4. Verified forms will nominally result in hardened concrete of the required x cross - sectional dimensions. 5. Verified location of reinforcing steel, pipes, conduits and sleeves with respect to x minimum concrete cover. 6. Verified type and location of splices, length x After samples are tested, results will follow on break report. of contact laps, and min. diameter of bends. 7. Verified support & anchorage of reinforcing REPORT SUMMARY steel in the forms. x 1. Work inspected was: ® Completed 0 In progress 8. Verified structural embedments in the forms x 2. Completed work inspected was in compliance with with regard to fabrication, quality and type. 9. Verified structrual embedments in the forms © Approved plans and specifications Shop drawings with regard to weld inspection, quantity, and x RFI ❑ Design change El Submittal ❑ N/A permits issued. 10. Verified cast in place anchors. x Document #(s) Dated: Description of structure inspected [to include grid lines, 3. Noncompliance item(s) were noted this date, details on elevations (floors) and drawing details]: following page(s). ❑ Yes 0 - No © N/A 4. Noncompliance item(s) were reinspected this date, details RETAINING WALL FOOTINGS AND BUILDING CONTINUOUS on following page(s). 9 Yes 9 No © N/A FOOTINGS. Conform ❑ Remain in progress * VERIFY ALT HOOK ON CONTINUOUS FOOTING. Report(s) findings were discussed and left with LLOYD of MH CONSTRUCTION Based on the Code, approval is required from the Building Official before the SPECIAL INSPECTED items noted above can be covered. Carlson Testing has no authority to direct work of contractors or subcontractors. 9 See additional report page(s). 9 Distribute attachments. Page 1 of Daily Report of Reinforced Concret. For: 08/28/2007. Job #: T0705424. Project: HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOCIATES - NEW OFFICE BUILDING Notes: In some cases more than one box may be checked for a given item on the front page. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTING, INC. Reviewed By: Steven W Leach Review Date: 08/30/2007 SWL /EAH CC: HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOCIATES - BILL MCMONAGLE CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING DIVISION NICOLI ENGINEERING INC - JIM ANDREWS MH CONSTRUCTION - LLOYD HENDERSON s 4 . 0 ,6, et Main - Office em Office Bend Office P.O. Box 23814 406■. .ddson Ave., NE P.O. Box 7918 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Salem, Oregon 97301 Bend, Oregon 97708 C arlson Testing, Inc. Phone (503) 684 -3460 Phone (503) 589 -1252 Phone (541) 330 -9155 Fax (503) 684 -0954 Fax (503) 589 -1309 Fax (541) 330 -9163 Daily Report of Reinforced Concrete Ili i Project: Obdiak 4 \ , — r r/C a ��. Address: .15.447 T\ CT I Job #: T1� ' S CTI representative t 4.r was on site this date to perform (Inspector Name & Cert. No.) r Special Inspection for "permit El DFS #(s) � '3 jurisdiction ` ;; In some cases more than one box may be checked for a given item. SCOPE OF INSPECTION CONCRETE 1. Checked in with sunerintenqreht or client representative. 1. ix Design approved? Yes No A Name: oyr Company: 1. C,-..cS 2. : itored loads arriving at job site for correct: Mix • 2. Type of work: 0 Concrete of Reinforcing Slump % Air 3. Work included: El Sampling 4 Inspection 3. Type of samp -s made? 4. Inspection was "IBC' El Continuous Periodic Number of sets S. • ples per set 5. Work performed: 0 In the field ❑ At p ecast shop 4. Inspected placing an. onsolid ion of approx. Shop name: cubic yards of concrete. 6. If shop inspection do they have 0 Yes 0 No Location of concrete lace , to include grid lines, elevations fabrication and QC procedures? (floors) and drawing det. • [ g REINFORCING Yes No N/A 1. Reviewed previous inspection reports? 2. Forms clear of debris? ���! • 3. Type, grade, size, quantity, spacing and condition _' � ' 11 conform? 4. Verified forms will nominally result in hardened concre >4 By: of the required cross - sectional dimensions. __ 5. Verified location of reinforcing steel, pipes, conduits and sleeves with respect to minimum concrete cover. After samples are tested, results will follow on break report. 6. Verified type and location of splices, length of contact ` REPORT SUMMARY laps, and min. diameter of bends. xl ,1 7. Verified support & anchorage of reinforcing steel in the 1. Work inspected was: Completed In progress xi forms. 2. Completed work inspected jg1 was 11 was not 8. Verified structural embedments in the forms with regard in compliance with to fabrication, quality and type. 9. Verified structural embedments in the forms with regard Approved plans and specifications ❑ Shop drawings to weld inspection, quantity, and permits issued. )4 RFI ❑ Design change ❑ Submittal 0 N/A 10. Verified cast in place anchors. > Document #(s) Dated: Description of structure inspected [to include grid lines, 3. Noncompliance item(s) were noted this date, details on elevations (floors) and drawing details]: following page(s). ❑ Yes ❑ No p N/A 7 I; r _ 4. Noncompliance item(s) were reinspected this date, details — ` � ' ` on following page(s). 0 Yes 0 No 10 N/A 0 Conform 0 Remain in progress Report(s) findings wetekdiscui and left with {_`` t. of i Based on the Code, approval is required the Building Official before the SPECIAL INSPECTED items noted above can be covered. Carlson Testing has no authority to direct work. i tors or ..-.con .ctors. Inspector Signature: , � -.., Page 1 of 0 See additional report page(s). ❑ Distribute attachments. Ver. 2 Recon 04/20/2006 • Terms: Client recognizes that construction observation and/or testing services provided by CTI are techniques which may reduce the risk of construction defects, deficiencies, or omissions arising during or after con- struction. Services performed by CTI do not constitute a warranty or guarantee of any type. Even with diligent construction monitoring and /or testing by CTI, construction' defects, deficiencies, or omissions in the Contractor's work may exist. In all cases, Client and /or the Contractor shall assign the Contractor the responsibility for the quality and completeness of the work and for adhering to plans and specifica- tions. CTI's work or failure to perform same shall not in any way excuse any contractor, subcontractor, or supplier from performance of its work in accordance with the contract documents. CTl.will provide its professional services to Client with at degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by members of its profession. This representation is in lieu of other warran- ty or representation, either expressed or implied. It is also understood and agreed that statements made in CTI reports are observations based on technical judgments, and should not be construed to be con- clusive representations of fact. If conditions different from what are indicated in the reports come to Client's attention after receipt of the reports, it is recommended that Client contact CTI immediately to authorize further appropriate evaluation. CTI's work shall not include determining, supervising or implementing the means, methods, techniques, sequences or proced4res of construction. CTI shall not be responsible for evaluating or reporting job con- ditions related to health, safety or welfare. • • • •