The URL can be used to link to this page

CPR 1-77 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. G, +.az •:��. ,�n ��4TT�u,an.„,,..� »_> w ,,.t:.r•.",aau r, 400 NPO #3 Comprehensive P1a,', Revisions SW 135th Avenue 0 • • I � I T�, k r•.ti,t 3 , I r I . I SI 11.1, h r mr I r!. f . I ; � : . ,Y „ • A •a . w l ' Ctv Admi. asz•Y a for rerlrh_ ended adoption. (b) Council directed staff to determine if parking was restricted on east Side and t northerly end of SW Main Street. (c) Motion to adopt; Councilman Nickelson, seconded by Councilman Coo14 Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 21 , RESf3LUTT ON No. 7'7 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE o CITY COUNCIL ACKNOWLEDGING itECg1PT OF TRIPLE MAJORITY ANNEXATION AND RECOMMEND FORWARDING TO PORTLAND k. METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION, (Caffal.1 Annexation #2 - co corner of SW Ash and SW 100th). (a) City Administrator recommended approval. 1 r u I. • approve; Councilman Cook, seconded byCounc lmen Nickelson,, !', (b) Motion, to app v s A,.•r it e' S• - il ay s. ` 4,,- -r.:-‘,...,.....',---',..---..--,--,..-----....--...,-,---.Ago,..,,,, 1' 22. yl'EPORT ON WASHINGTON COUNTY, PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION - 135th Street E),tension//' 'Lower Bull 'Mountain Street Pattern. ', (a) Mayor Bishop reported the following motion received unanimous approval by ", r g y g ,,} . the Washington county planning Commission at their June 29th meeting:� ; , "We are going on record as approvng alternative #3 and Mayor Bisl),°p �'� consideration. gg g only + � suggestion tt► be taken into considexa aWe are suggesting not developers ,i '' establish right-or-way but the Washington County Engineering Stiff be' 4 directed to estg,blish a corridor after study and put' it on maps and institute proper procedure to acquiring rightof.gay and as part of the motion, `;i, I also urge that the May`ots of Tigard and Beaverton and the Board of County ' Commissioner immediately begin a joint study to improve Scholl,s Ferry Road 41'' .. ,~wced tcgo �� from :Murray to Stat Highway High�ay '� g, � • .,17 so throe h �raff:�.c can bib int that say ', ,'„) 23. REPORT ON BUILDING DEPARTMENT STATE CERTIF” i (a) City Administrator referred t,., his July 7th memo regarding certif ,cativa or Building Department employees andcommendedthe BuildingDepartment ent staff for their effor is PROPOSED COUNTY REAL ESTATE' TRANSFER TAX; APPS I ,,' 24 d REPbR� ON '� LINTTS T�5 APPLICABILITY WITHIN CITY (a) GeneraldisctAssior by staff and CcunGil regarding realestate transfer tax it its present tot`ru. City Administrator recommended�ad° tin. a resolution in opp i.tion to the (b) C�t Adr�� a�.s tratrrr p g os . , bransfe.► tax in its present f�'ila " (o) RESOLUTION No. 77 A RESOL'lfiTION Or T'UE ".CLGARD CITY COUNCIL EXP,R.ESSING LACK OF SUPPORT POR THE PROPOSED WAS1INGTON COUNTY REAL ESTATE TAX IN ITS PRESENT VORM. Motion. to, approve; Councilman TAtakem, seconded' by Coutci.11man. Cook Approved by unanimous vote of Council i; PACE 7 .. COUNCIL MINUTES w JULY 11) 1977 1 d + , _ `yr �, v' 1"'"'",".'.'":—."."'--------..,,,, ,!.,t � 1. . ' •'v 7i ire �ti. ti• w. ......;u i..,...,.5!.M.,....,..Iw« ,.+ ......,,.. •...,/l..a..,.. ..,. ,.x9..t.. w..•..,_ ,.yl..a._..:Is,;., p.,.,..,,.., .,».4'a«":t,,.a...,4liw::. ,.._.d�Ld.JcF..-rir,.a.,t„. _, tr • U ,. TC: City council FROM: Planning Department Washington County Planning Commission Bearing on the SUBJECT: w � 135th Street Extension Issue DATE: July 11, 1977 t E' At their June 29th meeting the Washington County Planning Commission adopted the 1 5th Street s p � 3� extensionas propo��ed. �a�r their staff. (Alternate #3) . 1 attended that meeting' and gave the co ag ssion a short history of what has occured. in Tigard over the past year regarding this issue and informed them that the Council has yet to reach a final ,i.ecision. A schematic map of the selected is attached. The County Engineering staff Presented att►the meeting an ±r engineered route which follows the general at aph, prequired o ,� and. m�nim�.zee s thz. amount of cut �nc3• fill r• ,; I, u { „I fi F f , . I : fir• I � 4f; I I r n � 4,.,��' L • � . �, S" .1I t� � f / •iry+u�.M1wu.�,4wnakrt ub�� - • a , � • 1 E «N a + n ; . v....0. .6TC1'D ' 1 r ..r,P:. '...,-;.',43.-*"."'' '.,,: **.rgot.' (..) A R E fir.t, II..�,��, '�`�' t s t.4.0* yyYoa� „„esu o 2 - s -- DA KO`U'A --it, RFM ,... j °"'i ,EE r _,_-.,. 4,,,., L N4 i z' Y I-1 ,..- ,,i), r1r. ,t....'.ikt, "4 z.,b � *tea � �.,.« 5i��,�� , ' --):3uLL i,,.,,i,-,r NI a ..• .i.,2 ... �" � gip - = - 1 ,,, e.!.),: - .. ..$,-,) )4, . ,-ir'I'S74%.t:.' '-' ' 11111*1111 111111111!i1111111111111C111111111111111111111111111111/111111 tpq 3CALE I i w`>4, . .I4N«A a c, ', i.! .i ...,„.:.....7......_,,. Vd*� R .o ri p r5 ( ( ,..4... ..rlt.,;...+.ne..,..n. n,.W.•in1r. -,r. r 4.I�..r ,....rti. ..A, Ia.Fl.l. .....4m.4r........l..l.. . ,:„..r.i-„..I.Aw.rwW...3+..,.r .,._..wIFF..10...,�`.,wWr, , 4.N' µy.µ.... - .. Al 1, ,......... ,...,... i1.�4.....0.;'3.W,m.i.- t... ,,.. ,m.7.,n....t Y,.mrJ .. r.M+e.xl,. .,v •. + i 4k''I it j.. ” i WAS iNCTON COUNTY PLANN I NC COMMI SS I O;N �� WEDNESDAY JUNE 29, 1977 4:00 P� i ; ROOM 402 COURTHOUSE COMPLEX `' 1' $' w' ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS 4RRECORCEh. -. t . , CHAIRMANt McCREIGHT VICE CHAIRMAN: PETERSON COMMISSIONERS: BURNS, ;CURTI S, P:SHE ;'', HOPK` NS, MEYER, MORTENSEN, PETERSON & WYATT. 1',: AGENDA I . CALL TO ORDER - 4:00 PM - STUDY SESSION 'M' BOARD CONFERENCE ROOM ` A. Ras Northeast Buil Mountain Circulation Study '1 II , CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 PM - ROOM 402 III . APPROVAL OF MINUTES Iv. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 11. DI RECTOR'S REPORT: V I'. , PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: a •. A. Announcement of Board of County Commissioners' Meeting on Tuesday, Aug. 9, 1977, at 7:30 pm. B. Explanation of Hearing '`Irocedure.. i.. ' C. Public Hearing Items: .¢ .. Item Number' 77-215-s CPO 6 Applicant! B 6 H INVESTMENT a, . t, Request: PrelIminary Subdivision Approval for a 20 Lot Residential �t,{,' Subdivision .. FALLATIN #3 1 . Location: ' On E side of SW 18 �h Ave, at the intersection of the �t S'W 185th Ave. & SW Gassner Rd. , a portion of tax lot 400 I , f On tax map TIS, RIW, S e ct i on 308, S of Aloha. { PC ACTION: ''` 2. Item Number: 17-217-S' CPO 6 1 Appilcant: MEL SKIVER. Re4uest Preliminary Subdivision Approval for a 177 Lot .Residential Pl�e 1 i Subdivision - FARMINGTON WEST #7 , Location: On the N side of SW Parmi n0 tran Ad, , appro 1800 ft. e of , f 4, .. SW 209th Ave +. r tax lots 4400, 4500 4503 on tai. rrtep 1. 1 TIS, R2W, Section 24, SW or Aloha fir;. �' PC ACTION: 1 1. C # . Y h? �) N t 9 1 `1 � . w ' t 5 + +I•: 5q :I 4 - •-.—,.+..w,.;,k...f.w w.«,4:.4a.,,,....»it::, :a.,„I.t+,.r..al ..,,-,«-+.- ,..._+,..ww;,h:,t..«..1:...._,...c..w...:II,,....,.».....l:NlutJ.l.-ti..Y.Ww wr.Vwa,...,aww...w..... ,..M.a.. /yam FyV, �y��. • f I C A\:tt4DA ,A, ftlw:.•, PAGE 2 3. Item Number: 77-229-S CPO 6 Applicant: ELMER & GISELE BAKER i? Iquest: Preliminary Subdivision Approval, for a 7 Uni�t Residential Subdivision - COLTEN MEPIDOWS Location: On the .II side of SW Farri)ington Rd. , approx. 9 �,O ft. E of SW 209th Ave. , tax lot ''01 on tax map TIS, R2W',, Section 230, E of A'oha. +fir PC ACTION: t' CTIONs ` 4. Item Number: 76-1170_5 CPO App l i cant: IIOR 1.11.AIJD HOMES l Subdiv sitanApproval for a 13 Lot Residential Request: �re r ml nary .� i3 Subdivision - KEIIi ESTATES Location: On the I side of SW Farmington Rd. , approx. 700 ft. E of SW 209th Ave. , tax lot 102 on tax map TIS, RAW, Section 230 S of Aloha. PC A+,o”t ON 5. Item Number: 71-42-2 CPO 6 , Abpi I cants: CARRELL F. BRADLEY & W. C. SCHWEI,Ill Request: Zone. Change * From: 11,Sµ1, Suburban Residential District • To: RU-1, Urban Low Density Residential Dist. Location: On the SE corner. of SW 105th Ave. & SW Rani, Rd. , tax lots 3800 & 10300 on tax map TIS, R I W Section 19, in the Aloha area., PC ACTION: t' 6. item Number: 77-2u8-M A)p l l can t WASH l tHGTON COUNTY PLANNING CQMM I '.S I Ott Rerr4ues t: Nlo rti-eas t Bull Mountain C i r+ u l a t on Study .:' PC ACTION: 7. item Number: 77.4275-M Applicant: WASH tl1CTON COUNTY Request: Amendment to Zoning Article ' Section 165-2, Regarding Minimum :.ot Provisions in GF11^ 33 District, So That The Words '11.,r by action of Goverrnrrmenrtai ethinent domain'' Are , PC ACTION: b . • t�w Item em Nus er 77-305-M Yl Appl i � n WASiUINC "ON,1 COJI\ITY Request: Artteildnterit tit Arµt t ,1 II of the Washington County Community DeveloptseriL Ordinance Relating to Zot ln9 and Article 'III Re atirig toSubdivisions, to Provide for the Implementation i , » I of the iHearings ?OEfice,r� Process' by i�ov ding the Author- : - Izaion for Hea;.r ing Officer Actlon on Certain Quasi- Judicial uasi-Ju.d cial Matter o I n<;ludin Subdivisions. �y1lyy ( • /11 1 T I Otlyyaa. • .. r , b ttMR.tt.L'111kY.1.1:iC!C9�.T.»'k'Y�`b1::YL,��Y q s ' jl '\ 'Yi SIA. W3' 'f0i S rilN COUNTY Y Ni o G r. C UNT PLANNING GOMM iS. i'' k� ' !TAF REPORT JUNE 29, 1977 ur, �$ . NORTHEAST BULL MOUNTAIN CIRCULATION STUDY CPO #4 FILE NO: , 7-24 ,-M a .rT byAREA: tJ °.; The study area is generally bounded by SW Scholls Ferry Road On the north; the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks from the crossing at Scholls Ferry Road to the overpass' Highway w � a �9 Yeast; by . et99Won the a line south of 99W, and bylir hwa Bull Mountain Road, drawn perpendicularly from SW 150th Avenue eastward until it intersects with Highway 99W on the south; and , SW 150th Avenue and its north- i ward extension to SW SchollsFerry Road on, the west. See Map 1 . , C O A iCGR UND. On April 28, 1977 the Washington County Planning Commission directed the staff of the Planniny Department to prepare a traffic circulation study for the area lying generally between SW Scholls Ferry Road, SW 121st Avenue, Bull Mountain Road, and SW 135th Avenue. The necessity for this ,study came about as a q Yi + by . City Tigard, which had con5e uence of circulation studies conducted1 , the of 1`r ar in the selection of a corridor that' defined the future alignment of a collector street. The resulted selection of this corridor directly affected the design , of the street system in ,he 'Shadow Hills Subdivision, File No, 77-54-S, proposed bY Edwards Industries. ,,, A study of the he circulation needs for the area in the western estern part of Tigard igardhad �been initiated by the City Planning Oe artment staff in tho spring of 1976 The staff had initiated the study based on a directive issued by the City Council y ,l in November 1975 concurrent with the adoption of the NPO '3 Neighborhood Plan. The` council recognized that all of the circulation problems of the area had not been resolved through the plan development process, Consequently, they directed the Planning Department staff to join with the other public agencies responsible , for community development and transportation planning, namely Washington County, CRAG, and the Oregon State Highway Division, ' to study the future circuletion needs for the NPO 1 Planning area 4,1r 4 The Tigard study was conducted principally by the Planning Department staff and a joint `CPO/NPO citizen's study committee. This committee was composed of six members from CPO 4 and six members from NPO 5. Participation was requested from citizens who would be most directly affected by future traffic patterns. The objective was to have the joint committee study circulation problems and develop solutions which would then be forwarded to their respective community organization for endorsement. Inaddition to theTigard staff, technical assistance to the joint cmmittee was also provided by theWashington County Planning Department and , CRAG f 9 yy . 44 / °.' v {.at Y4 �.. y• .. 0.A' ` , $,a ./ ., • •_ .,. 7 a ry ;.. ` t A , 1 ,. kn�. a .. ... .:w_�,..I,.. .+w.:.,". ......,x,.. r♦ ..-.-.. »cel.«..,Jk: ,...,. 9 ,'"' Vill - . ��• ' URBAN I IA[ .� t b I i 1 �1 � M411� r ,M t1I " ✓f, cilkr./d,, U:':",i ail 1 t 1 V/t RIO N 1 e • r\l 'C7 HIrV1 .01/, 1i i, riE1R` ��W. 1j ", 9 79 I I • 0/., ` R1, tlRAL^ az as A�1,22;156 ' 9s 1 71 Air S1 210'" t9 .. V t/�•T 11 4 "r r5Gti31' ,y Et \ I I d gyp d / }itio, `i Innt, ,is I.. . f; AHEA fi a�q0® 'P� .TF,+.,.,-'. `r 1'4) f 1i µ I t 1 - ••a. , . W u�1®'�_�, i `'`„ ' 'tc � itt} 1�°!�.. W M'}. t,!Y OD Sw0,..0. • ir^ , � �i� My M :�.=l� a <a Y ��.,� ,� �� (w r. U D \-j" J 11 7 G pF yr I Sr pOO •,,,,r,17 �:, I, ' �� 1 HI h IPnr100 ODD ' •t ',�� A'� J� Grp, 111,� 3 to i Y I i p „ f t' !lllff ( t «' MANt�A�^'oaf ,� 1 # f �„ r I a'� unkatA r. „+ a'. AwaTn I„-J � I f e.� �1' 1 air_ b.lil,IGi 1i$ C(1P!l1� tltf I[ ��; J� IT. /4:71 � ,f 0� u '�. .u.,,,a'1.rll"!1� . Q x k,•.d ;I..' a 4, .r #,,, lo ;/' 11 4 I r'CMN IiI„„Y , tit! r K,UP wulw.....�71�G rl a'.....,*, .'r+rut r/,..74; ii \,A` t Et wlF",. .ra0, •' i, •• ,r wf•4 lI At.4 ter",r.. —,, (q� I w sr l /' Sr `� ' «1t tiagN ,4 0 ✓ .�w �'. ''' (( ii a ' L....r_ata •`I �a a3'4.44I''F•' -x ��. �� .. .,)14 71 �.• • I" ari sl,, nArllkwimrw , "�" 1f, q �.1., 5,.;4 `•L '" a. a ..., ,� I knllfC 414E '..N `,...w ;A' II tA,.•.,t k4}r `a"c✓,�'1;'"'•S.'p :' - rl . 4 r' • {{P ��.. 1 1 I~l. r'A S"« 'r,!` '^ !rw''n1 b, •w - Y j w V.,P t 1.f tt +tnrxl �Q r, ",, likr`r': i+iI, r;. 1Vt,IN" f ICY„,rlw'9(IAtt•I lets,; Wlh(..1114.4n''' ItrAR1A ",. ! 1 17, C� .• e t f 1 '",� I IM:1.1 I a�" unuK • . "`1 i; 14 w i:' r r rlawr ttr r �': y��1! '�.. aG I r• i4'. hrH•1'"�"I', 1 It ,,,,St i4` C ,n,rrle Im,'. ._'7 ,'r r 1t .14 ,..•, y'. c y t .r,° 1 ` . 4*„ ��. I h� ',4,� k�,a • K/1:1 S. a 1 " F� 9 /f9r.9f' r¢ rr • ,,'m ..44 iyY :1G wh1.Ml1Y 1,t ; 1 'w' ,.. r ' ai.ww.l�.**':',It .1. r>',•'qt., ., ;' -ii 't'ly�,, >vA J R !y� .,cY • V.k ilvi, ✓ "••.i;•,'„y,•�,,,� rTl'dIN• wANT� :e1 1',t ILA t� S,ot 1 � X ir Ii y+'%" 'K"`+y �T °r ,,,4 q •� i •'Y h'I�r tv. ' v ✓,utar ,.L,• S' .+� w F "'•, �J at • r,{:<,:ir} • • ;,� bPT.,.i �, �;1�>~� �"4wa�T /F.r rt.. Yi fid!' S,� iiii'a6 a Jf,{ fI h 1. � ti;,;},r ', % : , i0 ;. 4''� a U„r 1 yo!�.. • :� � °Ic GSRh } r}919;1 .4 J ;h'.; '..:+.�' ": y� � G�'.: lAA1r: IT.•. hy..jjYu1 .rid � �t. c« r: 1 7vr •�' •ii � J1'I1. «i t93/ s " W.J. tit': •Mw '1�N«i.«Ir�d✓ H 1t h .Ivul M � }tL M J•: :rti1 / rr,1, 'vJ.' yNr R t., }:%Y r.. ..,,.,y, ,r.,.'r,.,• ':••,•r:,'r'':•'•hr .Yr:, ,.h. h .« „ry�,}t1 •4h ♦_ ti'' ':ti "h4h%t�r� tiF::•h:' J:Yr. •• I r:ti�'r. .�' r`� rh w • ✓1) { I ��:Y L rV'�rW_•:h r� 'l� \'a:- _xiY�y, beti i• y•+ "'IrrL .I, ).r4y'1 1,.J:.'r'WhM ,J•.J., . � `:':.i'::'7:i'. NI �,. Y „„,.!0-,,,,, , 0,1 i , hI.11: r t°T F FI ANALYSIS S �« r L v ., �`y"•`I� r.I! fr r as � ,L .,', '., e ( tJ Y3 ��&P�' !�, y", '��J A�1,V'y,.6'ly Ilfi «" L Y eri �/y"� Ak • .'. h , a ... 4 h1 J..Y ,S 'e•`.,. i),4i ,, fir~ ,,0.Ly vKj 44' 1�0. G '.+ ,Iel�h,;,. 1v '1 v r � r-^:11^ w�i :4'°: y'�f�• rA?. :: .• �.,�r�:�, • �� x;1,..;,,,,d, 1 � :.�«:_ �y4` ,.„«+FT'ar+.I 6P' +�«� ” .... rl,MAkA s'.• •h d !t :- ;,,}p;",,,.: ^''�' :y,,::,.:• •r:{7:,; Tom # d t d4 I s,,� t}G«►!w•Ar111r,rr .,� r, o �� a j■�■�,"aJ_m®� sen :•: 1 L ; L -, y��YJ,y.�.�(ft+.« r«...�.."' „..e..1,,,„:),„1 .,M, L, '�.,�. "o'” r 9� L ( 1 1 tl111"" li „Ji•.;'f;K:i:;, r`E, "•.{4 h•• ., �Yy�. r'I(-.,ap .,,p,"... o ^'�A,bli�, Jr n�'a' /`}�' 1 ' ; i "✓ y , Iti i Lr{h +' w,, « NF%} rP� • ' •7i"' ''A J`'7• ,f lO H „r .* CrIC.E'4Ya.Irir$" '1�}��}J••t J; r. h, H �s 4n t 1 +,till I r t 'L��J%.ti; I:;:�+:; k v r `�t: t � �' Tq y .l h� '�- a • +. : J },/ h J ::J U y �. + K * W' 4 ^;.ir..,,..ww'a�' 4 kA r I r ` { T JJ ',{ J �'411 '"'1 1. Ni�f.t,t,I •.. "HE4 I.,i _ I i. ':it tail �y�11k4F' a,d,^. L� IJ t 'r..; I _,' i Jr a 4 'qT� ,...w.« �Ir i y ,,_.'I,Hi+M 111'ii it,.i...✓-.�'....,,,J L. w AL '': ':, :+ d .' ., , , ,e„,„,,,, ,, ,,, ,I.': ^. �' 'i I'k G�',?rtA1G • «r ( '+, ,,i j 1 r i'� L .v.w « ,.. ,.t,P 'w. •; .*/sd..Cmi3r:- 9 J , . r e it ++iir ••• r t 71`( 'P 1 ; 'n,:" ,s 1 I!' I, ,k"!`"' 1 4 :4 J 4""'-'ifir r . ✓ {•. _ ,{•t II ,. ' ..;li I x;111 ��+�i',, I IDprr lTNl.I�.1.r IM .. kl1Mr$t � >�d�. id •i•:I rt 1 I ;; J ,>. v.l u'i' �Ir:1 ,r' !- `n,r ,,,,1 . 4" 1 .1.:,...,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:.,,,,,,,....:11,,,,,,,,,,{ :r 1 q h':, , I. ►, ,,III II ,,il I,�,;' I. I�a '4. �. .�' I1 L A P «n fa r. f•r1 M t. a. ! J a,Fr J p,' d r% r h 1 II II, t, (1 ,1,111"a ,sp .y. p" ' ' d•. it +,( J -: !, ? I Il I IIi,,,:I' ',I I. 1e;�;� , u Ya«•"'ww + f Lf� {r � �' � 1 1-'t, 1i "• r. •; I :1 1'I1 III �C n ,.rp.�,.....�::., .S ,.• • 'ni. Y, 11y�� ' r ''+�r h ,i,• I k1, `', I..t-.?' ""�4 1 vl 'n• w' ..:- r'•1.. d• • ,w • 1t'� 1 W h ry 44 1� H�';�ti} I P ,I N I..�, Tr,` �(I P, ' �' _ L !I, 1.1 f,)r, , ,.' r a ''t w. 1 u y«u rr ... " 'r t1'b „ #� �' J•. 1 .7� L L ,',,F ,if ,.i, K I.'r" 4 " Y A t. IC L �t ,„,4,,„''114y. t.M i�k, u. _ :. ' .� ,, I!'I ? `} 1 c'r } I ( � J L 'a: '!'I�F kil:!Ij.�dt�, Ilr �rr� " ,NII W�: 'k. `�.t + v1 v�a �1 " w' ( ,^ i3w I � :i f �" (C �II rwAt'tr n1,, � t `� 1 + I �� , ..~tiu �,, , '�F= ft .,�,�� 1� 'v. ,., � i /w^.. , ,; • ,: � ((.i.,-, ..: �, 1;,"�r,\�,.'� ,- � ' •';�... ...�� '�IIIII'I 1iI t� �1i,,,,,,,:, r tl r. T ��. w, :pa .. • , I .s .. 7I�..,,,,iii, 1II 'r� ......�. d ..'. .I ..i., �.' ., ': ,,I x r�.�,, � JlrY)I/✓1 CI M �� e ' 1 d,� 1',. 1� fi I".4', ., L ' 1 4',... I. I. 1 f 1 I ,•,,..„(1:�f"µ7 �' r' 4'(i•;''' ^.F 4-- .� hl��" + :� (" f ': '� '.II,�„Ir1 t l'' 4 ..„�: wr �' ►• 1'n", V MWItI O U lint01811,►1111Ii hall' 11111el1111l iglililii(i^1iiiiiM®� iiia g Tt_ i 4 �� dl� P .rru'e ««. er y ,1 na �� .. I 1 � ','I td't.!I I 11 r1• .a,,..+,,..1r1.1.«.,,rl,r a 'I. 1 w " i" �~ � �� +fir; 1 pdp 11110 � «r 9 j, -1 • 1+ ,..,� �' t_".y �«1 /r " WlIV �..'1��.. l , tl , t.,..,....._,..,,..,..,„„,,, �, rV J! a, � ''l y YM r t n IgS 1 7 S,rf M1,F '',,e`' �..++.,W�.+iu.....y I I II 1,1 tea i . t1w t ." V tt ,1 r 1. Lir � 1 c, I. r«w .Irk d 1 IA t G `1: :..: `�i 1(L' w I:.,...,1... 4 ,'r ,.414�.J„u,+wu:4.1,16u.ww,ww w+lnlruwt44r:,wr.t' ..,n....1wi.I.W.,,... ,w t t r ri 1.« .• ,i l ' n 1 �I,E 64 �.i W..+aara..µ, t y 4 .t p , r 1r y 1 M. 11.X04)1ll14" , � y..1p P T ,„..,„„ , A, , , , ,r ,40 , , z ' ' ' ' �, ' 1jIi!;1, I m e 9{,,,, YJ� I i ' A'a�w , , , ., , 1 , , >,,,,, ',- k, i t ri tauAA•""`'''''u,«r� P 71rr'''' r r i . , , 1 „ , 1 •,,,s', ..„. ) 1 .4 • JR, ' — . ' ' VAP ' , O I— ' ,,..,i,,,,,,,..„2,:1 ,,,,„. Ri_.?" i +1 , L_ r, •.. - _ .. ,� tar t wnwla+wex_�'yF'/1'rcr,•...mm;.acu 1 rI5 J, 'ro ..i d..'id je 4• q 4 aar4Jl- r! ',, 4+ $ (. fir Ii �lie a4 I i ,, , . k .1, l', t 7 �2�$�M 1 w June 29, 1977 it I Page. 3 d i t i �. l collector street~�wh,ich ; The. joint committee i��ent,fied the need for an additional would accommodate the i nereased traffic resulting from the new development ' . „', anticipated in the western portion of Tigard As part of the study process E e-; they adopted objectives which guided their selection of the corridor for this street (see Enclosure 1) , and defin‘pd the level of service and development 1 ' O , standards for the street.' The alignment nment of the corridor formed a direct link between Scholls Ferry Road and Highway 99W. It became commonly known as the 1 1135th Avenue Extension, since this was the only developed street utilized as a major part oil' the link. The joint i't ommrttee's recommendation is represt.ntad , by Alternative 2 (Map 4) of this r•el,5ort Subsequent to the completion of the CPO/NPO committee's work, the generalon is rId epresof NPO 3 voted to adopt the committee recommendations and forwarded them I . to the Tigard Planning Commission for further action. On March 29, 1977 the ;`, Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on the alignment of the 135th Avenue Extension corridor. i3ased on the recommendations of the citizens of I` NPO 3 and the Tigard ' ning Department Staff, the Commission 1 i'lan adopted p a recommendation that the NPO 3 Neighborhood Plan be amended to include the corridor. o . i t ' , l with CPO 4 The ' � d did no • fare a • well �: recc rmen at r o.rst s The joint commr �tee s rr '' recommendations were initially referred to the Western End Transportation Committee. 1 The Committee declined to take a position on the corridor recommendations and forwarded them, without comment, for review by the general membership at the next j regularly scheduled meeting. On April 21 , 1977 the general membership reject;` d :j the corridor proposed by: the joint committee. Alternative solutions for future circulation problems in 1 ieu of the recommendations were not proposed by the ' point the matter rested with the r furtherns consideration.rat i on l membership action, a Planning' Departmenthfor~�fi At dhwas reactivated by the Planning I'. Commission's directive. 1. phasestudyi y and This of the was conducted o r:;t1 by the Planning ng Public Works. if) • Departments, and was designed to complement the work al reedy done by the Tigard CPO/NPO study staff and the joint commi ttee. The joint CPO/NPO recommendations i, were util i;zed as a starting point. Population projections, traffic generation and trip distribution data was developed for the traffic analysis area (see , Map 1) . Preliminary engineering feasibility studies were also made of. a possible • street alignment' i n the 135th Avenue 'Extension corridor;. Predicated on i n i t i e l ks. - •I studies of the recommended corridor, the study team de ,eloped a series of 1*. alternatives for consideration by the Planning Commis;„In, The results of their work is cannaMned in the following sections of this report. ✓A a F IND I NCS. 1 . The Washington County Comprehensive ;Framework Plan de i sgnates the pbrt Tori of the study area generally east of SW 125th Avenue Avenue as "Urban” and that to the west as "Urban lntermediate't. See mop 1 Y Therefore, a substantial portion of the area will eventually convert to urban uses it the future, Development will come under the jurisdictionof the City of Tigard as well as the county since a substantial portion of it is within the city ltmits'Y rt v ..: � ,:. • ,� • Ma �Ya .,a, .� .:: �: . ',. X11 77-248-M June 29 1977 Page 4 a Community development and related transportation rind circulation polPolicies 11'4 . are in plowing are { also the Cam rehcns eve Framework; Plan (CFP) , The fob applicable: ,II r• ' a, Urban Developmentoiopmenti (1) Policy 18 (CFP; p. 85) requires the provisions of certain "'minimum improvements'' prior to development in the urban area,' Article 1 of the policy requires: "paved streets, and sidewalks or adequate a pedestrian circulation facilities". s, i (2) Policy 20 (CFP; p. '89) makes allowance for urban development +1` ou,side the area designated "Urban" as "essential services are programmed or avc.i labl•e".'. r' '•. 2 (3) Policy 22 ( FP; P. 87) stipulates that the areas of the county designated "Urban Intermediate" are to be developed c► i-rently with the programming of services in accordance with a capital improvements program. The Plan (p. 8) also specifies that the ' capital improvements•program should provide for the coordinated i Programming of sewer, water, parks, streets, etc. At this time no such program exists in Washington County and, therefore, '. , the availability of each service required for the extension of urban development must be reviewed individually at present. ;'/. b Transportation • • (1) Policy 118 ( � CFP; p, + 1 I 9) calls for the dedication of projected ;. rights-of-way espec r a l l y whereya "need has been established ' • i ion" + w , + � 1 fora new corridor designation"t r (2) Policy 125 (CFP; P. 120) specifies that improvements, such as g widenin , be made' g irealgnment, etc„ , will k. de to existing roadsin • ', undeveloped areas k. r4 (3) Fol roes 135, 136 and 137 (all CFP; P, 121) stipulate that: collector streets shall be planned so as to discourage the use of local streets, that they shall serve limited areas. should not serve as major traffic routes between communities, should !, :•. be locatrconncr hborha d boundaries and should be designed to t serve more than one neighborhood. I.• • 3. Adopted CRAG population estimates and projections made In connection with the. 208 Regional Water Cl,ua1ity Study indicate that the 1975 ;population for , 'r' the study area was 7,421 people, and is projected to grow to 110450 50 :people 'a. by 1985 and 31,200 by 1990. '1,;9 4. Analysis of the adopted' Neighborhood Plan for NPO 3 and preliminary land' use u} plans for CPO 4 area indicates' a projected total of 2,240 single family and 290 multi-family dwelling unitsfor the Traffic AnalysisA'ea shown :on , I , Map 1 by 1990. (source. Carl H, Buttkt; Traffic CYrcu1at Circulation.n. g p� �� April 1 f�, 1973 and Wash i n torr Oc�un�wy P i an�`�i ng artmer�t Projections$ 1977)t1e r M ,t. , �. 1 `� iwrswx+,+ ..._''''''Ar''''''' 1. . _ i v J, `: M1 ' ,'.'Y x h., .4,',, • (x • r Yih. ' A 4w. ~ l+'.E,a / "aJa,." P C ,..�4....,.,.....,-. ... ..-..,... ,..,.. ...r-«,1. ..._..... i:_c,.l'L.,.-.'x:..,.41.._.... ,,-.... ,,,».. ... ,. .,,.....,,,-.. Sk,. ...�„_....,,.v......,M.t..,...a.,aha.:....n,,..»,.1.-.4.;..;.,..n......,_`a�1i..a...t.....,., ,+wwv«~ , Y. 77-248-M June 29, 1977 Page 5 51+._ 1990 projected vehicle trip generation rates for vari;:.s 'land uses are as fol'loWs: (: Land Use Two-Way Vehicle 'Tr%ps per Weekday Single,. Family Residential 9.0 per dwel i`i ng unit Multi-Family Residential 7.0 per dwel l l-ng unit . Retail Commercial 70.0 per 1000 sq. ft. leasehle area Office Commercial 18,0 per 1000 sq. ft, leasable area Schools 12.0 per 1000 sq. ft Floor area These trip generation figures account fear the offsets Prov deli by public transit and carpooling. The regional trar\sporat i on planning program For the Portland-Vancouver Metropolitan Area adt i c i bates that approximately .0 15 per cent of the workers from the Tigard Irea may use transit to and from work by 1990. 1 t is also assumed that automobile occupancy will increase • from an averaged 1 .1 to 1.3 people per car for work-trips by 1990, and that increased transit service to the area would also tend to reduce auto shopping . trips slightly. These assumptions are reflected in IhP above figures• (Sources Carl H. Buttke , Traffic Circullat on, NPO 1, Apri" i6 1971, p,, 20.) Prj dicated on the trip generation figures, ;the projected two-,way vehicle trips per weekday would equal 22,200 trip productions and 13,900 trip 3. attractions C in the ratr i cAnalysisArea. :Source Carl H. Buttke and Washington 'I County Planning Department.) t TI-IE PROBLEM: If the development of the study area proceeds in accordance with cur'ent plans, anticipated increase intrafic� per ion the existing collector streets ,ranging from low of 2 � � high of 46 '1• �cent to a g h �r cent could occur. The streets that would experience the greatest impact frc.• new traffic are SW Gaarde Street and ' SW 121st Avenue. The Traffic Analysis Table indicates 1990 projeted volumes. The figures shown do not anticipate the addition of new collector streets to the existing system to absorb and reroute the additional traffic that would be generated y,' as a consequence of new development in the area west of 121st Avenue and on r 11 Mounta n I ; s , 1 i Mi t, i'l r7 11 ry 77-248-M _ » June 29, 1977 Page 6 ' TRAFFIC ANALY"i S TABLE tRFc 1990 PROJECTED , __� .,. .,,,_,,,,,.: UERA!GE DAILY TRAFFIC (IatD`C" .._... 157'6 COUNT a SW Gad rde 1,30 4 „,.,,,� + . a,,,«'' °° , East of i21st 7,500 �-75� � � °� North of Highway 99w 3,073 11,000 +7�,� 4 SW 121st Avenue 4 1 North of Gaarde 1,904 I 7,300 .1b74% ' South of Walnut . 2,181 7,400 +68% a rI „, North of Walnut 1,126 ' 7,600 +59% 1 SW Walnut Street West of 121st I 2,954 5.9.00 4'57 rr. 1 ,t'! East of 121st 4,798 6000' 1.2,1%,,,k, West of Former 4,070 1 .4 , 6 00 '�' 3J }p� u-uWv�h SW Bull Mountain Road West of 133rd 2,21'5 5,500 IE +;gig l445 Cast of 133rd 2' x'96 6,500** +65',e. i li West of highway 99W 2..725 7,000 ' +6'1% I t �:, a on Carl H, Buttke report �ra,stfic Circulation NPO No '� _ ._...+. ��1 Apr'11 16, 1'w75= ,i Based **Washington.Ce::..;,rY ty Public Works bepparttiient praJection. Iy �. ' The problem with additional traffic op Gaarde Street and' 121st Avenue, aside from , it disturbing Ohara Leri s't cs to the residents along the streets, is that there is only limited public right-of--way available to which to make the improvements could ' relieve the ongestion. Caarde Street has a dedicated right-of-way of 40 feet which . was established '_in 1897, and the right-of-way on` 121st Avenue is 40 feet south of Walnut Street and 50 feet north of it, The limited right-of-way does not readily permit either the widening of the `streets for three traffic lanes, or the •, 1 construction of left-turn refuge lanes to facilitate turning movements,' The problem is further compounded because a number of residences, particularly on Gaarde strweet, ,are built close to the street, and any widening would virtually eliminate the ir front yards. The residents are aware of this situation and in i , the post suggestions to widen Gaarde have been met with stiff resistance,, Development of presently undeveloped areas Can be expected In the relatively near future,~ The City of Tigard has recently annexed approximately 180 acres in the area between 121st and 135th Avenues, south of Scholls Ferry Road. A master development plan covering several properties hes been, prepared and accepted by the city, and 'the process for the provision of water and sewer seev i ces h4 been initiated. In summary, the near term development of this area is no longer in doubt,, I I, I 'pt IIS I , 9 b 1 r' r r. r `r � 1' I l � 1 air Tr it _.,lr .:c:.,..,�.««.« ,.. .°.,,M,.:•v x3-_. ._.u,,. ....._ r,... .... .-lf.C...., ,., .._«t,i..„ 77-2_48-M dune 29, 1977 Pag 7 ,I in t ion to development pending at the foot of Bull Mountain, two new subdivisions on the mountain are either being actively developed or in process of review. At present it can be anticipated that development on the mluntain would proceed at a somewhat slower pace than below, primarily because of the difficulty and expense in providing adequate access and sewer service. Despite present difficulties it would be unrealistic to assume that development Will not ° occur considering the unique setting and thehighlydesirable residential • environment of the mountain. r. STUDY METHODOLOGY: ff , . III The staff of the Planning and Public Works Departments dev ,�loped a series of11 alternative approaches to solutions for, the circulation problem in the study area. Each approach was based on a different set of objectives, and was analyzed by using standards which were derived from those objectives. The primary source for trip generation rates and distribution was the NPO 3 circulation ; study prepared by Carl H. Buttke, already cited earlier in this report. 'T'he statistical data of the Buttke report was supplemented by data compiled by the ' study 'team f The alternatives were based partially on the following factors: 1 , That 15 of the total traffic generated in the TrK fflc Analysis Area had a °desi tnation i n Beaverton. (Source: CRAG) 2. That 2000 trips transiting through the Traffic Analysis Area originate outside the area , and the 5O (1000) of °these trips would utilize local ti streets. (Source: Carl H. Buttke, Ibid.) given ,. ,� 3. That 5% of the traffic on Bull r'•1i+�s�s��°a i n Road, � i��r� i��o e� �,.� r� ° a l ternati ve, by-passes Pacific Highway by using the frontage road and Garde Street. Le, (Source: Washington County Public Works Department analysisr. �; I , Based on future traffic projections he study team came to the conclusion that a new facility would riotbe requ i red to have ca*ac it beyond that of a collector *I — •MwWwM..+gs:..•He.�n.+neis A Fl+r'w+:L.eMues u.lWrMww»w4 » .. P street. Consequently, the alternatives do not consider any facilities with capacities exceeding that of this functional classification. 1' Alternatives la and lb, ‘See Maps 2 and 3) rti �� Note: Projected Average Deily °Traffic (AOT) on the pl i nc i pal streets for p 1 each alterantive iss Ind'catod adjacent to the 5 tre t» The objective in the case of both of theee alternatives was' to accos oda to the Projected increased traffic volumes by the existing street system and without the construction of any new facilities. However, this approach did not exclude the consideration of making improvements to the streets in order to increase their capaci ty Y. Ai ;ernative la ll wog structured as closer. to a "do nothing" approach as possible. The intent was to use it asa benchmark for comparison with other elt,errrative D I I ', +v P � y ,,,,uaarrna nvAx„2i+,..amev.,a .,, r. ' , .. 1 t \I I.�� 1 f ,`.... � `lam '�A •Ri i 7, ttt t :rpt 1 \\ '` .,, 4. .. i 44,b,w•r,ti#a I .. is .1, { ` .„,/ y,,y# . .d.t t {'.. ,th y+a1 4-: �,li M. O•rt -- F RE1A 1 P •« •IP 'rr wy,0, DAR ' n N 0, I 7t1 C"�( yam- „.0..„„,%_ , , ,4•k4s ,.., Yis• 4 f .. � t �M ' 11 ,',,, ,....,,, ,,.T I Git'it;) ,Vii. 4 r LL) - ‘ - 1 ,‘ 1 ),..--3'. , ww �' `tZLalp» `` Q!'' i 6'. Q d tC O ... rya rw jl ,/,`:''4 yy ,.,, r r'- _� SIGNALIZE .,,,... a , w� A ��•'.1tJy •I�� 3. wravori '4 tem W 'W .. '. { goings r, ten It„ a. j, i GAA % „„„,...,. , ..,,,.. ‘ , at-Lit i- - s y t,(>4 , �n 'IM ii4, i ai., ,..,. ' ..„„„., =,...,... 7500 k 51 oN Ail.l ry a+,7, 3LL � . AfC + ia NSMJ"1•MA] „tF u M r-r r ,=„ . 600 *,x . 1 ` 1 IYI'Aiish� } e w .'AR^ i , t «. tr pp ; �1$111111111111111111111111lqq 111111.111111iliil.iii11111,1111111 ;' 'Y IN i 'NN 3CAL L n,t 00 1 , , 1 , . ul 1 title W t. AP 2 ,. ,... ,., -r .,:...rte ,•.�, r ..ua.••+++••kvuxm•'c4wmm".Ch "n' n rr. 6 / .1 0 x 4l`' Y _ r ' i 1 I i a 1. y�.1 ,1 1. ,.+'4-..,,,..,...,.-»..<-:i.,..,,,,,,,aJ..z.:,A,I.....A ualA.m -,.4.,,..-4./414;,,,,,,4,�. M.1.�..,.i'ti.... _.,..,e.,,,,,..,.4:1,...,,..Y...7r.,”.,..,-,i,.,4,5,. M.4.1....,,...,..I.,,,,....4.,',1.1,4.,-,a .wwSs,,., I. .:l r +.,.w - .. ,n. . _..fir .wy 4 .,a-�.�:..,�N.._I.r+.,:e,......�..,,.,.:;,....M i,.,:... 1 }•';. t�?r^ . 1 1 • t }#fi r'ir tl� " t r ��,, I ,w. 4`a '''?'''' 1 10:0' ARE A, 1 t' tivx,Iiti‘'‘..,,,:.i; '1, ..'..,,,,‘,t'.1if,t 4. ' .,(Dtp,,,.,.' .0.0!$.1 liolgt,I..,).t.,0t.'1U K it N Ni.,,,,,.,\A R i i.i ,' _ Dil+i<.t TAI ''"""�► 1 ., •, r. � ,,i paewptpautrriau�w9dcer�w��d>�t g' ti T I G AR Q c Gl " "' SCJ': 'pi, ..� ALtGId1,t1 :% . '' 0\/ 1.?4411,,__ s\t\iAt--'0'.‘)411:,„1401$1s ' 'tG,Nis,k...1-44E ' 49'6)421''''-''4oi,-)45? ‹, - ', i` - ..... 1-4.1 . to e.., ; ci,. ,,s,-,..,,,,*,)gl:., 4/ 1,' Fr = m..:: , :moi , , ,, , r.�e i� 0 '' '�o , • • ,.�. C�A:AIZ p 1. 00 .' Noma ... :J ' U"Ir= •BuLL 11.,ii--r 41,,,i ii6 c' 6 N.1 x r' aalw yw fir} w r I viii$iiiE iiii11111111d11111111111111111eii'1111111111111111111111111111111 , „, 11 I 1 N k k' SCL 5 ,) ,,,. . ..,000 , ,, 1 ii . is i i .:,..: .s..w ... :.... . .... .. ..... _ .: '...-.... +...._...... .,.....,-1:...«.z.,..+-.... .__....-.v,v....cru,a..:x:rw..x.........s.x...... u.41.: .x-.4.,.+.M..........Y.,=4'4..: .., t,.a-..at.....A.«i:F...+. ....Yx4-...:-....,A,..- .M--.«.:is"J.1.._.+!u..r:�:S;:u`W.WrvYAwA cxc':::...a.r.4.i--....... y w;. C. a, 1. 77-218-M w . June 29, 1977 Page 10 f' approaches. if carried out, this alternative would be the manifestation of a policy that treats all the elements of the existing collect.;rr system equally, creates no incentives or disincentives for the utilization of one street over another and makes only the improvements that would be necessary to relieve congestion. • Alternative lb represents a somewhat more egressive" policy in dealing with some of the projected increases in traffic. It is predicated on a premise which reclassifies the function of some streets . In' the case of this alternative SW Gai:Nrde Street would be downgraded from its status as a collector street in order to give it some relief. North-south movement on SW 121st Avenue would be ' facilitated by connecting i.t to Bull Mountain Road. SW Walnut Street would be made mora attractive for east-west movement by s i gnat i nation and alignment 'improvements. Conversely, Gaarde would be made less attractive for east-west movement by not improving it byisignalization or widening, thereby not increasing its efficiency. Additionally, an off-shoot from SW 13th Avenue would be f, recommended for F;xtns ion into the' newly developing area so that traffic would use this facility ,'or north bound trips rather than the local .5. ,,trees or SW 121st Avenue. S' a i 7 see M A er at 1. . 2, It n r � p The objectivewas to create an efficient link between SW Scholls P'err'+ Road Highway, The corridor of this link, commonly as thO and Pacific W i�y " � known as the j 135th Avenue Extension, has been recommended by both the joint CPO/NPO C study committee and the Tigard City' Planning Commission for inclusion in the NPO 3 Neighborhood Plan. Projected traffic loading In the corridor indicates the need for a collector 1 street, with a curb-to-curb paving width not to exceed 40 feet and a nominal right-of-way of 60 feet. It would be necessary In the cases where extensive cuts and fills are required. or on curves to obtain additional easements in, 'order to maintain the development standards established for y county roads. An integral conce tf this al r rnat.oe i_T that the actual street would be built concomitant with the development` of property in the corridor, and that the construction would be accomplished at minimum cost to the public. This is one of the major j developed by the CPO/NPO joint study committee and was used asoneofbthe creiteia for the selection of this corridor the objectives objectives are included in. this report as enclosure 1. The adoption of this s alte-native pacquisition on of some property at direct for implementation would require the ac urs,.tr public expense where the st• reet would connect to Highway 99 and at the inter- • section with Walnut Street. The development of the collector street would be predicated on not having direct connections between It and the existing collector street street network° This condition was included in the formulation of the alternative in order to ensure, to the greatest extent possible, that future traffic on � , existing collector streets would be� red ced. However, the; projected traffic volumes based on trip distribution' e$.tiririates indicate that the number of triP s would still be sufficiently large enough to require three traffic lanes on SW 121st and SW 135th Avenues north of SW Walnut Street. All the other streets could remain as two-lane facilities,, ri , t `i 74. e .. •.}.,w,.L:. ., «.,.w..- ,....,...•rtir n.�...-.,.r 4., w,u,s,..- ,.».�..,,.---�.u.�u�s,.,., -.a•wa«,. i I � o. 7 4 I y�4iyti'v,t i +11 } ✓t. It t � h s.,:, :,:4''{4444 q5 A lZi:14 ,, I T BOUAR fi IMPROVE') y � 1 plam'fa,'„k"'a t"'*Igt' oji • 1MTERSCC"I'IO f►'w• t— r„: f r4 t & I 4'^•x"4 1"NI-6 � 4 1 ..rv.w».r ..r.r u'rrF., a !�� bid' *- C ,-,,,,ty '', { ,'• l --...-.)i ” "T ' , ,i' ; 4}1 t!.., a }�{I E wt -pot ltr eA"• +fig'�ti� P ''' ‘No. -giV \NALIS.A., ,,,.,,,,,.' V''''' ;• '.'''1•;.t,'..: 1'',,. l'.1 7't. . '', ,,..\,,\''' �' r 1„kv.N( r IjtV. "Y1; PON NE 'ypPs� `� '<:#7,) 1 '.. / :3, •'$. ,r�, Y *Iy X17 lik, 1 I l t 4 MIER ISIIIIN wsure ri i. . ' jjkj M L fib: .. i. 60 'rase � ,�' 'I ��."• �� ,• I. �'. slYl�■i L L T • lWG r4a.J 41° ,4» �,r✓y I � :,rp p''' ' 11 r, _ y i. hI e e6r�e •".: �....i '6 'f oo f * ..,,.'''.%. -1.,4''',. = tMtot cVvED � "�t a " NI Xir Y � Nowa If) ! pp comm14 la,,,,i riz--, „ . oot (icePO REC,OMNtATION� � �SCALE 1 V.r1W1 i.-...-2.0 � A:.,: �...i.IGARc:, pL AN N 1 tqc 0 Ecolv4icLNI DAT ` ,. 1 , , mA x , • jI .,•., h - . I � Ivl.wa-.u4iuW`+,u+.T.,'+„•arum�v rooA+MYAi• w • • ( ' 77248-M j June 29, 1977 Page 12 } 3. Alternative 3 (See Map 5) This alternative approach evolved from studies of Alteroative 2 conducted by the study team. The primary objective was to segregate service areas as much as possible so that a new facility would be oriented to serving the developing areas almost exclusively. A secondary objective was to ' reduce the attractiveness of a new facility north-south trips originating outside the area'. This was accomplished by terminating the corridor at 1 •� Bull Mountain Riad, rather than i hway 99w* It would thereby: ; prove to be' attractive for north-bound trips to Beaverton and the Washington Square area originating on Bull Mountain ,`and not particularly attractive to south-bound trips with a destination beyond. Bull Mountain. s Estimates of anticipated traffic loading in the corridor indicated that only a collector street would be required to meet Future needs . Integral to this concept also is the proviso that the street would be constructed concomitant with property development in the corridor, and the costs would be borne by the I developer. Despi e the potential development of a new facility, traffic volumes on SW '121st and SW 135th Avenues would still be sufficiently large enough to require three traffic lanes north of Walnut Street. The other collector streets of the system could remain as two-lane facilities. The essential difference between Alternative 3 and Alternative 2 is that the corridor is placed somewhat higher on the north slope of Bull Mountain in order to takebetter advantage of the topography, that the corridor is more closely aligned with SW 135th Avenue and that a connection to Bull Mountain Road is made through the newly developing k Shadow Hills and Hazel Tree subdivisions, DISCUSSION! The major purpose of the study was essentially to determine whether or not a new facility would be required to meet future ciruclation needs and, if so, what ; , /I should te level on the of service bei Basedresults of studies by, the Planning and Public Works Departments study team, and previous studies by Carl H. Buttke done in coejuncti on with the development of the NPO 3 Neighborhood Plan, there is a clear indication that a collector street would be required to serve local traffic. This con :lusion is Predicated on the anticipated development patterns in the study areas and the capacities of existing streets in both Washington ` County and the City of Tigard. Although a need for an additional local collector ' street can be demonstrate.d,no comparable need for a facility to serve regional traffic has been clearly established either forthe study area or other areas lying to the south or- west of' it at this tim . An investigation into local and regional ior►al transportation needsby were made' the CRAG' Division during the early phases of the study at the behest of the City of Tigard. The results of this `investigation are contained i.n 'Enclosures 2, 5, and 4 to this report, The inevitability of regional trips transiting through the study area must be recognized This number is expected to be relatively low, approximately 1000 AO"i , !. and therefore, would not have a significant Impact on the area. Furthermore a basic Premise upon which each alternative was r tructured was that trips of a regional nature would.be discouraged, Therefore the route and type of facility in each case would hot:prove to be particularly;attractive to this traffic. Also, R 5. .1 .T. n .. ...444.4..4... -04...w.«,.4, .,.,.....4..............-.44.4....,k 4.,..,.,.,:...., 44,4,.....s..,.r..»,.-., .,,:1t+,,,,,.4,.w+,.t[..,« ,.,l..,Yta«...,a.,.R. ,.,-;A::,,.,a..nG,,,,,,+14,,.,..ttr-4',t,-,,,,,?4„.,,A,`N,+,au..,,.t ,!p rN 1�.t .,''',,,,,,.,,,c,,';`,'-41,,,,,„,,,,,''''t .u31t l ,;,,, x �� ;,; fixe .,,,,„ , „ y„ ,,, r � 4 V r „a - 0'*'4 ' BOUN[)4RU , ,v 111 SMR ww tt,/!++//l{�,ly j 1t:iRG ,,,>.•oit' '' ray ' ' 1 , • « ,+ ,, ++ _t.,,,5,•2,,!':+0-70,;;'''',..'...''',.' 6700 l;;, .•It* , S ''t jar.''''^ . ”' '.+rr . \ r�t Y `Ry Pi° %.,.; u r-- wo, . ' F:k � iS3 '� Waft , m. it.'"i ", C.) ' It)' 1 ' S.,,,,Z'‘.t C DE80 111101.01 7+` wars L L 55'4 Y 4 i, 1 1111111111111i11111111111111116 - *I':<1:Z" 0 ,A P ' bk JC LF 1' = ØQ1 .i, P. 5 s , , rJ ......e,.r,::wi,»;�.,,,+;ox:tt...iwz,n.,uu.w..u,..,...,..uw. �^:,.a�m:..r«.s+a,r_wieraz:w,.,.eu+HGw. :«at:...,, _a ,_..w..�wwwwiv.w•.,w ., » w,r.�»:Awa:cw,a_i,wu,+�+ii4W,3+WftYNi:k .,in:a.u�,...,4i,.w xaY,.YU..,d,,.«, r,,r., ,/�,,a, ,.,wkx,-,.w.,.,w,.�w,d...»xti.•.W.p.Y...,,-.a.r, .... 77-248J1.1 (,, ,'. a June,' 29, 1977 Page 14 this study was Primarily designed todeal specifically with local circulation needs . Because it was found that regional transportation needs did not affect it directly, a decision was made to defer a study of the need for additional regional facilities until a much broader study of the whole urban and urbanizing area of Washington County could be Undertaken. A major constraint which had a s i g)l i f i cant influence on structuring the alternativesfor . was that the county has virtually 1y no means..: of providing i n g facilities needed in the studyarea from public funds. An analysis of develop- ment patterns made clearlyevdent that the options locating corridor atte p for at t ngsa torr�dots for a facility that could serve circulation requ i rements ,beyond those 1i i mi ted ,to providing access to individual prope7ties ,were rapidly' closing as more and mora' property was developed,. Consequently, a need was identified for a policy which would serve to guide future development and, at the same time, provide a means for aleviating the projected loca`il traffic problems. The options are l imi teii since the county has virtually no financial means to purchase the right-of"i4iay required for a new street prior to the development of the ro erty. Condemnation developed, especially p ,� ti � � islevel o ed `es ec i al � -� p attori of property after it 1 if at� • has been tn�prr-vied; is not a, truly viable option. Also, improvement of the ' existing street System would only have a limited effect on meeting the need and would genet ite problems in its own right. For example, improvements of SW Gaarde Street ,,"'r SW 121st Avenue would require the formation of a local improvament district since public funds which would be required to make the improvements necessary to increase the capacity of these streets are not available. It is highly unlikely that the owners whose property would be directly,and perhaps adver ,ely,effected would willingly contribute to make them.' Furthermore, rw' the availability offrom other Sources, as i Aid �' Public funds s the Federal to the Urban System program or new sources of taxfor ,road improvement, is highly problematic at this time. Therefore, it was deemed; , necessary to formulate a policy that could, first of all , ensure the future development of a facility that would serve the area without K la c'i ngadditional demands on theextstirl system and, secondly , couldbe built asproperty developed with the result that virtually no public expense would be i ni,o tved. A precedent for requiring the construction of expanded facilities to meet an identifiable public need has been well established as part of the development process in County. In a number of cases requests for additional p w Washington ngt��n right-of-way and street improvements above those required for local streets have been made of developers in the Past. Salient among subdivisions corn feted , or Still i r th rocesb f' dtye l o i�eryt are the. following: p p 1p _ k 4 i » ,n,,„w _ ,�...�aM.,,,, ...w 4.«_M .,,Wa:,«,.,.,.,.r.,v, ....,t, ?.,,...,� ,..,,a_t.w„rte..k«e-«i,�a..,,., .-.-.�k i,..v..,:�:t.��x.,..,d 4».-;Mti1w,.4._:.:» ..,rv::.t4a. .::,v�.1 v.M.e'#.IuS 1 77-248-M ,y. June 29, 1977 . ww 1 Page 15 SUBDIVISION NAME STREET 1R.0.l » PAVING WIDTH Evergreen Terrace Major Collector 70 ft. x10 ft. Rock Creek Highlands ghlands Minor Collector ;n • (Rock Creek Blvd) 60 ft 36 ft. ) Summercrest PUD Minor Collector 60 ft. 36 ft. Farmington West No. 1-7 Minor Collector i' (Carl in Blvd.) 60 ft, 36 ft, 1. Cross Creek Minor Collector 1 (Carlin Blvd, 60 . ft. 3 E ft. Four Seasons Minor Collector (Village Lane) 60 FtY 36 ft. RECOMMENDATIONS; The Planningand Public Works Departments make the following recommendations : w' 1. That the corridor described by Alternative 3 in this report and supplementary staff study materials be adopted as the initial element of the Official Maip for Washington County and be des 'gnated for the future construct ion of a .+ collector street built to county standards joining SW Bull Mountain Road With' ,SW cholls Ferry Road. 2. concomitantThedopt ionwofadeveloPpol icy requiring that segments of the street be built property � .h rr�,ht ofwithin i n the corridor.dory The specific i c e design of the street with respect to location on the subject property would be determined by the developer subject to approval by the Planning and Pub l i c Works Departments 3. That the following specific design and development standards fo+- the street be adopted: a. Curb-to-curb section equal to 140 feet. l b. Nominal l i ght of way equal to 60 feet, including sideWalIxs and public utility tility easements. It should be noted that when detaileo engineering studies are completed additional easemencs may be required for slopes and curves where dictated by the topography. c That the recommended speed on the street not exceed 35 mph. d That the maximum slope of the finished roadway not exceed eight per cent except in those cases where existing streets have hpP1 utilized with slopes in excess of that specified. . fd : j '1 7 C• t. { 4 ��. � � ' JF ' 'tel, 5 t !' 1 } � ,t.w}'aw a +.:.++:-?kw+::...r.m5k[SJY,kl.,+a•,a-^x .. ... _.•k,..:,a wz,.,.ami.,_.....a.,..w»,. ..'.t,..,.—,+.-,_t t..i.-...w..+w:,i...v .u.✓.r{,.a EXTENS ON( i5th • Objectives for evaluating alternative proposals 1 . Design , a facility to standards which would not attract additional ' regional trips while servp.ng the locally generated trafltc as an f*, efficient link to Scholls Ferry Road and Pacific Highway. 2. Reduce traffic on G arde, Walnut and 121st. Rel,teve Gaarde, Walnut and 121st of a major portion of the traffic which will be generated by future development in the NPO #3 area. 3. 'Minimize the onv ronmental impats resulting from road cuts, f1=1ls, etc. 4. Minimize the effects upon existing development. -t 5. Accomplish at a minimum o p public expense and avoid the necessity of public right-of-way condemnation where feasible. p t. s L B: h,I t }} } I I I , jt M7 _•- .—. r.,,,. ..,.....fi ._......:. . .........rt..,,..,—w,....,,.k,t., a,a.„w .........,:o.;,l ,,...,+.ti,..11,,,..,...,.,.»,.,,.+.,..N-..,;...re.,.,,.,„.,..-,.,.,,..t,.,...u:,,.w..,.......,... COL CRAG 527 s.W. HALL STREETnt PORTLAND, ORE M':972x1.,�..:i� 4 k.ti. ' ,"� (5031221,-1646 , . OFPLA: 1N tom,,, � � ! a rE��i�. df ti��k JUN 4 1 19 lb RICE,EXECUTIVE CtlRtcC"i`OR May 4, 1976 > Rpq AR MEMBERS E !\fD AMAS COUNTY "I�I a' d97 g' ;aricw ns�y Mx's Dick Bolen CITYOF T�aa A stacada oiadstorre Director of Planning aPPy valley City Hall okeseo ,Owc Tsaar , Oregon ilwaukie Ql�it� Pre on City Dear Dick,' iverg ro g ve , result est 'r, This letter is a of our ndyLinmeeting to discuss the ' iisonvllig Murray Blvd. extension on April -aoirMviAewk CChLIN'�Y 15, 1976, together with the Oregon Highway Division and Washington County. The rest,arr, meeting was very` profitable and I appreciate your ay�voar!Park taking ��rtl�na the initiative in resolving this matter. "Your: routda:e idea to involve ,cit izens in the planning of this project andvillaga at the earliest cpossible date is certainly good. ; '* „,iNci N'COUN`f`1' •aeJks . meeting,. we will do as much ab arneiiva- possibleto provide eastertan As I indicated at the ec n to " seibam helpyou and your citizens gain you with technical information ,+ ��nCrovein a clear understanding of the problem and some possible ,solutions. ,illsborri ing City • arch Plans A complete technical analysis ys is of theed facility 4 herwoot!'. propos cleard and its resulting affect on local streets require uaiatirn a considerable amount of work by our office, not neces- '; , j at this s � cla'rEntISr,taSaS delineation has �stage of general oor)ridor KCOUNrr n some analysis done. for va i u e e this general area, and it can be used to determine termine t e general heed for andeffect of such a facility. ala City Our analysis of the le era O,l�artlarsd . `i'n Transportation Plan ��(ITP) I, ns in �' �nterl 1.97 55 hasproduced some:,the fall of , demand figures, tetflotOregon useful in determining the merits of this project. This work shows that between 9, 000 and 12,000 ADT could be s expected to u,se a proposed facility (Murray nlvd. extended to 99W) in '1.990 under the assumptions used in this test. These volumes would certainly justify • two--lane facility in this area, 1lowever a closer look shows a significant portion of this demand .etimate the result of constraints to other facilities l ekin 1 capacity for the demand placed upon them. ' I a 1 .... .. .... ,., .... ,...." , ... t f:....., ..-,.r.x...,.,>.A- .o.ta:.............. ,..++,.r,.....a._...«_..i..-...,....».,«.M.,.a...,-,.-,-m.,;-....«.-,..`P- Page Mr.` Dick Bolen f . May 4, 1976 ti ,. Highways 217 and 99W in Tigard are two ltaciliti.es which seriously lack. capacity to meet estimated demand in 1990. The capacity ;restraint procedure used in the 1 traffic assignment process reacts to these constraints and searches for other alternative facilities which have additional capacity. Consequently, the Murray Blvd. extension is assigned 000 to 5, 000 trips result- 9 r • .. g front capacity deficiencies on 217 and 99W. Before capacity restraint procedures were applied, demand estimates on the proposed facility were approximately 5,000 to 7, 000 ADT. These volumes could justify a two- lane' road with provision for some future flexibility, depending always on the estimated cost of such a road. This same analysis indicated that 121st Street traffic volumes also increased by 1, 200to 1,40 ADT after capacity restraint was applied. This increase in, volume, as well as the volumes estimated without capawa . city restraint, could be substantially reduced should t 4 traffic measures to discourage through trips be applied to 121st: These trips would most probably move to the proposed facility. Much .of this analysis is very 4 f f i r.u l tF- �1-^ 14°1' =t s u c h as small.ti`T'1 n r•,ai:1 n a ri�y �4-'H n c o . ... ...r+..«r.,v...4:u+1. �.-w «...♦.I l+.1.1 v Lw'✓aa, Yw Uaii�e+i.:i+.a: v:V 4.1 tal.-ir L:a,►.N.aA Li44i:t7�W iw.:.iJ'LJi mates should be used with caution. " From a regional nt it spective, an extension of Murray Blvd. to the southeast, connecting with Pacific Highway • West (99W) somewhere south of Gaarde and north of Beef Bend Road, would connect higher level a ,,�terials to each e and to adjoiningneighborhoods. d other .. 'g �,�h�.s' extension: will divert some traffic from 217 and from 99W, at well as decreasing traffic on S.E. 121st and other collectors in the area. Without providing a minor, arterial on which to focusx : collector traffic developingc in this area, serious effects will occur on existing streets. Existing local collector streets such as Gaarde; 121st, Bull Mountain Road and Walnut Street, (depending can how streets are connected) , will suffer in two ways First, existing cur. estion on 99W will divert to such treets and second, the developing area witthe collector streets to the West �, be forced to use �.h+e for access. Construction of ithe proposed project ,has several advantages. . It provides some relief to serious con estion on 5 99W in ''igard, although it is not a total long- term solution. Additional study will be necessary to determine other solutions to the, 99W problem. � I i h ., It t � IVI I E I�itiY. M�,4«nw,lr....MwFit+n.l}wr.r�v}+F211.+�.i 'ryn{h.rt } Page, 3 i I r. Dick Bolefn • ,May4, 1976' �.,� ` • t • It would provide a 'xiiinor arterial fadility in a TM th velc�sl.ng ar ca needing infra--urban c»�onneot ons r It vrot*lti relie'Lre local cr)la,ector streets of through r' traftc. It provides the, opportunity for traffic controls ." ; that would encourage use of the, proposed facility for local traffic rather than collector streets.. For your own examin .atio , you will find a copy of the • ry • XTP network loading enclosed. Should you have any additional questions, please call. your help with this project will be very much appreciated. Sii'cere1y, 1i { Thomas J. Vanderzanden Sy'4or Transportation Planner Tc7�1a is 5. 7_4 Enclosure CC. Ed Hardt._ John C,rocrttAe.tt Larry FrA2ier tl . R 1 111' I� It 1 • ,.tee f I ; � F. Q fp/'0'...tx � , :::i,•40 :4 • *-4` • ;1: rr a. rr!' .� «341 t. C I �,, .'1 4 tku4. }j4} u ,� t r 19 3 4.,t .s .,) .w ' ~ r'4 � f 1 . ` )1 1 n.�S•/ I') It ~.V �,. K'.. A�.`y1 W- i 4 �' L IU,@) ,r, * ' ~...G:,, ? ' ' n. 4' i,'.;''' , .ilMr 'T« .i f a 14 Ai N•W1 �1 « . L� `y l J pr ,` �4.iL (IG,'�1l.l,/t«;9f :9� ,/',.aM f r ,y;s« y .* ,ir„ rn_, : fir`' ,,Esa,N ,� +y:«I :N7..,.1..•-;,,, .-..iir +., : • ,1 ',, .J.. Vi Girg,, r- w (51.71 �,•r 1.00 • ' ., Rr it 1, 4 1,, .14 r, r iiX n. '�� "744 , ., • } ` ti ` V I 6, G , , '. + .,� rl + f pt"lr; , + 1trrni., 1r,'i...,,0' Cr wwn r s .y r 4ti ✓ ,r ' r'1 � V dr' , 111 /•,,t E .3.3 (�`' F•�ry(x'') e ,, u r$a, ,., ,. i. Vie.t .y " /"..b.'"---/"5.0 (gyri 16' tib. .} , .� / ,- (1.5)St relh 1 r1_ ry �d l''''' •1 . «i"pl 4 a' ,... -+r` w I tI ':.. *, fit` 4 y r a .k; f �oid... ,• 1'9x'1. ' ... ,. .:,j i W. r N aha r I , is..w f .r t Ir t,1 u 4 a.,Lys' Y Tilh► i-. 4'1 . , 4 t it , L tL. t r +` 4 ' re, '+ ►r «* k " w rr, w �I, it rpt ' 4, " 11I _4.i,�.r ......,.,.,- w w, ;w.... ,te a,..„,. ‘ p,. * 4 NCLOS URE I I I ' ' 1 ''e(I.1.1-4 V' Cii 01- TIGAivl ) i2�2Q S. !'V, h4airf '�'�p�f�r�;jErtf1.1 ' COUNT Tifl8rd, Oregon 97223 ��` (F PLAN ,0 July22' 1976 ' 0 �3 a �r 4 1976 , * r. , Iff„' Thomas J. Vander Zanders Senior Transportation Planner Columbia Region Association of Governmen as 527 SW Hall Street Portland, Oregon 9720? I , Dear Tom: , This letter is to bring you up to date on events since our meeting of April L5, 1P7e to discuss the need, for some type of new traffic facility between Pacific' Hi ar hw. y and S cholls Ferry Road. The Tigard Neighborhood. Planning Org� rnization 'rr3 has recently held two meetings concerning this matter. The first meeting included only their membership and at that time they agreed on two Points. These were: 1. Based upon the preliminary work completed by CRAG and t lx e suprisingly high a990 traffic volumes for riei gh.borhood streets as Projected by Carl 8uttke, Consultant Engineer for the ,City, that a need exists for a facility to relieve the local residential streets of projected future, through traffic volumes. 2. The location of such a route should follow a minimize thy: impact on existing neighborhoods; such an align- . men should therefore be either east or west of Bull ,zoun,tain w, , At the second NPO #3 meeting theleadership� of Community planning omntnityPlanning organization #4 (Washington County) was invited to ` discuss this and attendwith the,'Tigard .NPOI and see if ' ,�.s matter the county group coric.t rred with the NPO's findingS. The result of this second meeting, on July 14th, 1076, was for the members in attendance to request the jurisdications: I involved (Washington County, Tigard, CRAG, and. the Oregon State 1U .ghwa.. pe��artment to Perform further ana'ysis of the two . y 1 � Poa. form In your corridors suggested, that your office has done the preliminary survey regarding this matter 1 wouli now 1 ike to request that a more in depth study be made Of ,thc two routes suggested; either east, or Wes+ of 3ul1 Mountain, In 0dd,1tion, a point, that was raised at the meeting. . ..h y Tvr8p ee r O a, the Sashirigton County Public Works Department staff, was the effect i k � 'i,.r. * :,� ,,;,.r.. ,,, ., �,.. .,. .. ,.... ......... ... ... �.. .. i • 1 a 'I ,, ,1 yrTM 4ofa larger arterial facility which could *Possibility be placed to the. west (beyond the Tualatin River) I. and tied into 1-5. r, Particularly the citizen group *as concoVned thai. the placement of a new facility east or west of 13u1l Mountain` not operate' as &n attraction for north-south reg oiaia1 traffic. In other words, their intention is to provide a facility which Will take through traffic froki the local t`eighborhood stareetand move it in a north-south direction i,')ut at the . same time not draw regional traffic movements into the area. Tho.;refo e, an anallysis of these alternate routes should, include a discussion of the generating effect Of each facility. It st • that .ad to Tot. Speer to bring up was of course this question . le � ", ° the possibility of a larger regional facility fu,rthex. to the It west to serve this rerional traffic function.. C am aware that yoU appreciate the need for resolving this transportation issue in the Tigard community and will appreciate '' the assistance of your office. Because the location of such • a facility must be resolved within this community, 1 have moved ahead to initiate public discussion and hopefully resolution of this matter. I believe that something has beat accomplished thus far by reaching an NPO consensus that a need exists for a facility in this area and to recognize two posib;le rol tes for such a facility. We have now proceeded as far as possible until more specific traffic engineering information, can be made available and hopefully, this in f c.•mation can he made available by your office. Pleaselet me know at the, earliest possible date whether or not you will be able to assist us in this matter and also what other agencies you feel should be involved and coordinated with du.gyitig this stage of the planning Process. Sincerely, r ,,j Iry r Jr, ,�•;�.�•' ;.-.�-.� . • Dick Bolen ! Planning Director ,. Dssf i cct Ed Storm, Senior Planner Lloyd Schulze Washington county 9965 SWW. McDonald' Orogori Tom 'SpeerPlanning 'Coordinator J Public Works - Wtt.shingten County Membership of NPO' # Beverly 1 roude, West. End Chairperson CPC #, ,,todel ane Utzf Quest End P *a.nspor.at,i.on. Committee td Uardti li,aigional Engineer yy Oregon ate lurch sway' bepnrtment rw ,. .dw.. .. ,. ..t., ..n,...,.,?.+... ,-...., .ei.,,..,„:at„ «I„., ,n..,...M:.,+;,..-.vw,.,.,.nM4M •n,.t..w.,- r+IC'w,..,.,.N,.... .,.t,«, r,m...Mm,1, : -,.M.-..t. ..«t.u:,l.d:.«..,..,6=:ht7k`vu,w 4,,:rx..aTM v....wM:.h.F,...✓ y «+w,..,a.w. E 10EOsIM" .IV + ,J�,,ra, . COLUMBIA RF6ION+�! A CI 1 IO of ,a�. L` N� M' t. ' ^v: u v t.,.....ti ' ' ' '* '-''-- -— ' 527 S, cV, HALL STREET ?_JcL:�,7* ,s., (503) 221,1646 C ^ , RRY RICE,EXECUTIVE DIRECTOfl August 27, 1976 r1,1J/titin , DEPAR 1 'Q COUNTY ' �r p'� x0 . .° REGULAR MEMBERS i OF PLAN ip i. CLACP AMAS COUNTY '• "'ITU 8arlaw st:1414 Mr. Dick 13,.)len2 1976 ' Canby t 1W statade Planning Diriactox: Glsas+orib Nappy Valley City of Tigard Johnson city O. Box 23557 . Lake Oswego RECE,V .j S Way j , ' ' fdti{WaUIYK 124.20. 's• Y1,1 w, 1��A�..�,.n �- , 4°'1'6 Tigard, Oregon I .. 0,e00,, ;ity , is Rlvorgi»yv� Sandy1 Vies;Linn Dear Dick t 1l Wi!sdnvilie MULTNOMAHCOUNTY This letter is for the purpose of clarifying some Fairview + .. Gresham issues regarding a north -south transportation improve- .rravwood Pstk Ment in., your area. Portland . ,, „. Wob VflIa r First, T think that it is worthwhile to clarify some Y ; .A.: WASHINGTON COUNTY issues on ,the ra c►.,.ed t c�unectx,on of 9 9W ��:��h Murray sinks ` Boulevard' in a cora idor -ust north and east of Bull I' Cotwain:a mountain• From a regional perspective, st ch a facility 1 Durham Would, hive little effect on traffic rnc:;vemr,:.,rits. It Fot+st Crory' , 1' Gastoal simplynor have the connectivity Hillst�taro ' would' ofnoea.l ,regional s.ignfiaI'lce. This facility , ' ': size, tt�;make it' r' be residential as s,fi ` NrrihPtains; largely y d `.-r' is' a poor 't1�?Sti""', rsl,et>4ot'd tutefor�o they routesserv3ng�ma�or�employment centers ju►satin and other regional trip movements. This facility should 7 A5SOCIATI*i;AEMBI<R5 largely be designed to provide ninor arterial service ' to ,a crapldlydeveloping residential area, prom a Rk COUNTY . , Vantai,ver regional planri»ng perspective, such a facility should ould 1 . Ca *' not be viewed es, 'a facility that could help relieve Highway 217. ,`Future congestion ro,blem.; as'se c;,ated lith Highway` 217 � y. �. should be de:al�. with � �, ire directl Cc��urriL Yt CYt�� cyaut�Y.� 5I Heaans The roti o!Iidl'Iiand 1 :1''''1",,e1' Ire+r d' The possibility.. of a larger ,facility west of Bull T he ate A ;' . : g., �... ,�a i l ... Z` - 1�rcur�taan and coinectan� such ,�L orf facilities as St 55W, Scholl8 Perry Iload and TV Highway is in different' league than the one just 'discussed, The ' desirability and need for such a facility would 1, I , depend almos entirely on fuaturee land use decisions • in 1 thel area It would, serve+ Such a facility would not 'reduce the need for a ,minor ,arterial serving the , F , r r / * n ` , F t vr,b. ,Yn.,v : +rw r,srm ` , ' e , N • 1: 1 / ' '- '..SLr..,-.,.:t.,...N=+-t , c,e.u.,,A:..w.,.,_. ...._.r,,:...I,.-,.-*.•vµ.m+-,.....,,ti1, ra,», Mr. Dick Bole August 26, 197E Page 2 1 residential area on the northeast sides of Bull Mountaln.' Further, in light of certain ,;policies and constraints, r feasibility of a I--5 to TV Highway west of Bull Mounta�; 'n facility is highly gtestionable. . o. f The' federal policies5 focus attention on "getting the xnost E out of what we already have''' . This .policy' encourages (`, measures which increase the capacity o" existing facilit ,e,s »: via operation improvements, transit, c-Arpoots, flexib,1O work hours and the like. Local policy reinforces this, `' national movementA The Interim Transportation Plan places attention On existing, rather than new, highways. State and local land use policies that place emphasis on containment and preservation of agricultural lands could be significant obstacles to a west of Bull Mountain facility. Perhaps the most significant issue that would jeopardize a west of Bull Mountain facility is the one of finance. 1 There is simply no money, federal, state or local, that in the foreseeable future, could be made available for i such a pr'oj ect. 1 11 In summary, the long-range planning policies of the il federal, state and local governments make it questionable to consider such a project. I can certainly appreciate C the desire to remove through traffic from the environs of the city. However, S think theheplannfi."` process must4, face the issues which Influence (in, this case limit) of r f options. t This agency, in coopet at io,ri with Tri-Met and CSD©T will be undertaking a region--wide analysis of future alteernatives. 'fl r 1 . �9The ..detail„% of this process are not final. We will attempt to provide an analysis that will help answer some of the transportation questions which cities such as Tigard face. Sincerely, Ic/ , *17410.-- .c.... i...e.'''' '''„ ,,,,, ,,,,..tie.ii, I ' 1 Thomas . VeltderZanderlt Principal Planner I TJV:l 5 c' • it14 -16 I 4 w�«.".....✓'�G �.,��.,d..a:.,u,,..,... :«x,.:t". ��.:rc,.cr.:»atawu.,..a,s:'.»r,iw«,,,,-..�:�r „-anc','-"__.,,...,.;�:...r.,.:xr�..u=.a.w+ircu+.. �-, >,w.,.s.n.;.+a.�ba.,w.,umi+w Wx .X:[.... Afa, � {r ,y.inl4Mkfi+A-, ur nwl')�w✓°Iwt ✓ ..J._ _. i •�.\tt .1 t��, �' i 'Y4 c."›, t iti4,1'l 4 1 p x • --E. , f 1 ..'.'„-G�-e.S+-c.4.• i' ,. , i _t_.,...,,,, /..,..:i /...t,t.,:// .6., (2 . ,' d'-'7,' —,0m. 0 1,,c, .ez,,t/1„ - 6-6ce ..t. -cP ,i , e , ., r , . , , , ,/ , , , ..--- , . . ....--4.,,„ , ...,,.....,,,. .....,. ,t4.,. i ''''' it t ' ./,, 4...e..,‘„.. .e --. z:r:f 6,,,.i.-:4-e,,,,-1.-•t___ ... ' WASHINGTON COUNT ' DEPARTMENT OF PLAN'NIN G JUN, i77 a • i }.'w ani f I I c t. + b CV i ....}„—,«. WMt=« .M,. ....1.,,w.... .....,a2,..16u,w„..r.,,..+a..a,w4:u,4+,a„<ear,.,i-.,j.+.a:7ar.1,....4;.,«..' 1ae+.0:...,Piw<.u.:-,r3.,..i"kk r..t.,�',�vin.M.ax..,,zr,;.x. .,ai« :r,I,k .fir,.,» ,, . a ‘ / ,...1/1,,, ,..r g:el?,,C..? L>1.,/4e...1 ..4 a.)-0-4---,---' 4-, , w a „ .. ‘,,,,„-,e...,z,..- ,, - , , ,_ '. (iii - 51•G.� ' / rr " , " ,: .a... ,.....-e—/....., '4�!t' ,C.�.Y• .-� G2.Y 4, _I/ ce.e"-'-' *,(....„..1. 7"—.4...., ...,,,,t, ,,,,-_,- ,L'..-2,...„-t,„..z.. ),......:,;(_,.,..,,,„„,) c-,--9-4""?2 e_-,....{ / ..,e, 11 .,-1.-t.e . Z, 1-,-'-z--1 e-I t--' .-'ie.-- rJ ` it /'� xA A. , 4 L y _�-"—w'iVt.a' ,L ed-,,-...... '''' y+ w vvv ••x r 1 • ( e4 •' 6' (?/Z, .. a 1 L -� .. r ,,,,'') ' • - Lam” '''''''.e...,'* ,12 l' 1./"6/.. Z J' M Y a fi ri r . i„,.._i Y, ,• . . 1 _ 4., �'.. S :,;�✓rte �iw,uµ1,�,.d '�.M^ 'w•,�, :. � � x iLr�'Yw�x• „ 0, ,.... Al 'e._ ° r-,... I 11 t3I ' w «d n:w txC Wa.,at4.- I.i rw.. ." (..,, ! ,. e-le")') e") e---(-- e. k---(--- 1 ` r ie,�(ji' , L., 4 Irv+ : I ,r.n�T • f,1}/fes./' Ilf�. r.i� ,t/' >•ar.�"' i'{.XYwr'^ —,...... `"' ! ��. / ar2� �%7 j ' 2-c' e.-a.-t2 e, ,e,(-23,,,e /e ,,e',,i.e , &,,,, . i / , ie.' ' r.",....." 9 n . ' : , r.. , - / r. ty 1 : : _ 1/4.11 f'7 � � - y I'VSPIII\I ' a LINTV , 1 , ' „ *, ' f 4 A,I c1`A4EN T OF PLANNING JUN 8 1 » 1 p , .., ,ry n.,.,..... .w,..t. ..,. r .t , .n r .:M,t,F,.1 td I , ,. ..., Hn!I p.,. r: ..t ...,,., — ,, n TCitlh ,,. .. i t ,. ��.•. ., ...•, „ .. ..... k . ,,...,.,, i .... Y�t a.,�»�,v...d....:..VYW....--,..-c. L_., :tl«.t..t:.W ....-.u..,.`...,yb v,.i,• 44t:ti:....qr x,ian cm, 'iuw......i t .L."1 ..m 1 ....,. a�+4r..Y�+.w.vi-.W,.•...ie m,•".-..«.....,,„,.,..:;:�:� t,�' -�n +,-a«-� ..o.ti,�:�,z��..C::.d .:;.tt'.?A..al f,... .-�.W;.w::rC...J..t.�,uw�,.w.«w..,.r.�r...�k,. ,» .... w..Kna..n;.��u...,. �, .M PI/'.`IIYy °kN N•"��.• '.�.Au NM.iPA1xn rVl.�l Mi W K�!!x Y' •x1� Y�`1`�j .. I ,( � A i '. Myt • Verne � n el � coley X278©,S. T. Bill M�. n. d s �tanlul�n oa a ' Z i� rd, �c'c�on -97221 Tune 24, 1977 Washington" County Pl.��,zutiit Co' zti,.sio� �+ Admin i str^ation Bldg,, 150 North 1st Hi11sb ro, Oregon. u_ss�ar to favor Altk'nat. urge you the P1az�zz�.g Coan�t '� t, �_��a wive I A, of the N. E BULL riGITIl'CA v tt. Studyrt under number 77-24341. '' We have personally attended the 1%1337• rrieotl.ngs oi^;the.rPO I azzd the Bull '1+1t.. Home Owners Associat-Lon `with C�Ta s'ain oia County Plannirig Dept ,meznhe^s 'present,. in whichvbtitigg' dis- approvedand Tigard. P .anuui reo Co�uaiss .ops r.)rrin�n•- o�,u„ NPO 3 da tion s ? is 2 and 3, and .1L it It is our personal opinion that the Planning Co!mnv.ssion should favor what the Cittzen 'l10 e4r.s and Taxpayers of this area; have presented to the Plat tri" .,G. inti aLno s t, una� nnous' m,�ijoriry for.' ,, ;cUPte,..1ce, It is our personal opinion that thePeop i,e i'r.Y this area in azo •political :iced. t` accept Pian 1B:, ; , and 3 Hoping youa i 11 reconim nd Alio the County CummiSsiouecr.s the Plan that the Ta: pa ei4 of this area ha 'e s�tbs itte((, y , ;anis, or any. P1a�i t��i�.ch the gill a� 1� at •dais t Verne D„ and Fraaices ,,�, C�eel+� Y/ A , Dinners ZOM 3 ares. Hap 'omber. Par6e1 Na., 02 S' 1 W o9A 0290O 02 S' W Ua. 02801 I! t4j.,UAI EEC - ,,.!.Ivry.L I: I I � n 1 1, I 11 Memorandum ,r To City Council From: Planning Dep. rtmer'jt 1 Subject : Traffic circul (tion modifications to the NPO #3 Plan Date: June 27, 1977 1 , At their June 21 meeting the Planning Commission was informed of the City Council decisions relative to the Comprehensive Plau ,Revision request made to the City!; by NPO #3 .(the '135t,h Street extbnsion issue) . In response the Pianning,t Co ission' made the fo11owdng motion and asked that it be sent on to Council. "The Planning' Commission re- quests of the City Counclil that any revision of the NPO #3 traffic circulation plan which efknbodies substantial changes from the request made by NPO #3 be sent book to the Planning Commission for public hearing. " y 11 11 r , i Flnancr` Land t)evelopers Bualde;L .omes a Manufacturers of Components Real EsteSa •Mortgage Loans'•BUtIdtno MaterteL ty 4 0, RDWAR.,I~D .,S INDUSTRIES, INC. P. O. BOX 549 - 10350 S. W. 5t6 i{i%si �'F - BEAVERTChN, OREGON 91005 ,1 PHONE 643.8511 June 27, 1977 Washington County Planning Commission c/o Larry Frazier, Planning Director 150 North First Avenue Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Gentlemen:Gt This letteris intended to express our concern regarding the proposed 135th Avenue I extension which is scheduled for public hearing on June 29, 1977. As you can well appreciate, w: e have attended co' un tles s meetings relative to your p Shadow Hills project and future develoment policies for the Bull Mountain area, . By this time, we feel well acquainted with the views expressed by the residents. We believe that their desi fe to retain a quasi.-rural, low,density character ra.tid our original proposal for the Shadow Hills project, which includes one-half acre . standards, Because of the present 135th .A.�ienue lots and rural road are in accord extension proposal which is now before you, we do not feel that it will be plbss ible to achieve either our objectives, or more importantly, those of the community, in • the subdivision des ign that we will be required,to prepare. The proposed 135th Avenue extension with a 60 foot rights-of-•way and 40 lioot urban road projected to carry, 6, 000 Average Daily Traffic, is not, t; in our minds, consistent with the either existing 1bor ptraBull Mountain area. There is no question with the need to provide ett �. traffic �y movement in this, generalthrough the 135th arra, We � believe Avenue proposal, which will draw outside traffichrou h theroad area, h as v p ng-ttraffic needs of the'area, y re , is necessary to achieve the to local R' erm � In addition to the effectof the p . on the comma ,. -practicality .. the proposal;.. ... . ,�i�. {�` and our project,� we .,.. it question the development Construction of the road is appa�,entl.y proposal. to be dependentproperty v lopment process. Only two projects ark pro- jected to occur in the foreseeable future within the proposed aiignnrxent. These • I I l P \ 11 f } �� \,,\ M...,HM,�,m «....:.,:, Sl .a �G 4� a%..•.._.... ...r,.,-r<,,.:..--u..w,....:.:r:.r<,,a+.M-:..,x,.,+.1 ..J.v ^».ww.,.F :-;:: ,.i:. „w y�..;, wadihington County t Planning Commission ion - h June 27D 1977 projects will not complete the 135th Avenue extension. If the road is not to be k completed and, therefore, will not fulfill its transportation function, one certainly ''I questions the need for the facility. Another ,, factor to be considered in the present proposal is the topographic constraints of the alignment. Many areas are either unbuildable or are im- 1 practical to construct, �.articula •rl if it •is expected that individual ro ert 1,, ner will bear the cost through the develo p entprocess. p ' � s Y g p �, c.v Sa Other alternatives seem to be more.practical in accomadating both the local area i; transportation objectives and the long-term character of the Bull Mountain area. ' At thdi very minimum, better utilization of existing roads including Caarde and ' some of its existing and potential side streets seems far more realistic. 1 In summary, we oppose the proposed 135th Avenue extension and specth�`ically Alternative 3 as recommended in the Staff Report. We urge the Blarirlitt Comrn ss ion • 7 to consider the position of the City of Tigard as we believe their proposal is more ?1 in }I keeping with the desires" of the community and still meets the transportation ;, r «ti ,r objectives for the area, t: r ;� ; Sincerely, , ,,).f. If (; ♦ • EDWAP,DS INDt. S`IR1E`"', INC. Land Development Division ' David Ma Edwards 1 ,, Manager r, it i, lE i i)mE lsw -f r Y cc: M. Telfer, 14265S. W. 141st, ' Oregon '�'�«�2 ' Mr, ,Stephen '�!: ard� Mr. Jerry yiu to 4, ?ortland, Or 97201 i ' �'alrr�.e�y' w.ilse... :�, '�:n�.� 222 S.W. �.ar.r��+��i�.� S } , . . • .. ThE PROBLEM �) indicate ar traffic.Project ions of future traffic volumes for the area which lies generally northeast of Bull t4ountarn[ tl I on the'local` streets will increase significantly as the area continues to develop. 'There are f`iu -'streets Which act ` s the pi incipal collectors for locally generated traffic, These are SW"121st and 135th Avenues)q .*� ',gtarde and, Walnut Streets and Bull" $$ouniain Road. It is anticipated that Walnut and Gaarnie Streets and 121st Ave��ue will be significantly affected by the increase in traffic resulting from the developmynt of the area if no new collect= streets are planned and constructed. ,_ .}i '. . Theproblem. can be illustrated, by comparing'traff itcounts', to taken in the s y1ing,af 1976with the traffic volume% 'ro ectad for 1990. The projections assume that no new collector streets will be built by that date. Sea Traffic Anaiy:{s Table). STUDY BACKGROUND When the Tigard City Council adopted the NPO 3 Neighborhood Plan i n Noliembe r 1975 i t directed the'Planning 'Depa`rtment to, condi.ct a study of the circulation needs for the area south of Scholls. Ferry'Road, generally between SW 121st and - 135th Avenues. Their directive also urged that the other g ubl is agencies, i.e., Washington County, CRAG and the. Oregon State. O`ighway Division, which were responsible for community development and transportation planning work on this study with the city srctl:iff. As an extension of the 'work-done by Tigard, the Washington.County Planning Commission 'directed the y "lanning Departrient Staff to prepare a report on the future circulation problems of this area and to reconnez1.0, solutions. this notice .briefly describes alternative Solutions investigated by the' County Planning and Public Works Department / 1977. . staffs,= and contains' the joint recommendation that will be made to the Planning Commission on Juree.:g`, , • *.)) s t!{ ' J I 1 ;:..,..;:,;„.„,,„„i.,*. I Pop.?x,150 "K 127, 4' �� r a'� '.r ..1'42--, L � eN. L.....,s, 1:. t riV1..LRM St. STUDY A■ 1EA '`w or 113 � • lam, / 144101.1040 B • • �f.TVI I '`` /6 0 i MAtte-„,,, ., 1%,,,',- F I lam. W er.'..--,e-„,,,,,,..,„,,,,,,,,, .. 'V `I� ` `:,1.a►. • t �,, yam/ . �,�" s..�„�..u.-.. �. ` � fli,... ' •/ Q�� '.. �j,5Psi1NOwD f r..�� a •, , rS•`. E �. I r , NF1� • � ,, lM„..,A.ia1 i -' II » bhKbTA' ` fr. 'bAatlTA : ST. 1! j ,. tlA11OTA � ... bees..s.�'� 41MMCA it.. thtbT `� �'� 0 . fit 14 rq ♦. Y l.1it1661 cast DRi ."w 2 i. 4' W I IN ' { p - I I �'� �, rr �I�A,CN III,T DR, 4`D z TfCApO,.war fj; K '"� .{J {, T `V Y /7i � �_ ® , �� ~~ -. r NNO { ^• f ' ( "F+�� YDACC*L � � 11Yr '', "nNAtowlMha + , �y` PAN"-• KANtI{st • AMM sr. �I„cowl I -, ,, i I ,r r ` FAAItF � + �� Chggl ST. r yT�r44 �t y/t `AN WALN""-1 T, fL - f "• - A '41F iiCst a o..v 1• LN. s. (, �ALlltnrik. � 4 TIIts*.b i*.k 1 :PIT 10 075 alae aNNert sr. ,14�jCf L` .,,�tS. Nth No nncfv Er. laa ,.iti,�r' . ' orri aW ,,,,,,,,i..7 pkMwtiDtix t Y } ,,: Ji 4gi I.tA,a►aN st. �' F . El . It• + 4 •s,F,,!d'� z ... i .fa1Ei d 1 t1�,,* . ..,' "i?.......ey'L,,r r ��y _ kAY.. P* a 1� fit" stir i(4~ ✓t "t - . j, ..st ,,,tA k . IAffiMAtFCj. I .-,..,,... "�'?,.. "`"" Q ...,,.,» ,. v,,,.46itiir hi vlc.w ST. IE..s'/µ yfti4 St. IfTN ! �..y„��y'u ettLt;PiITa$« s � E E.iii souk, 4 or-„.'•`... 'to bkMRCtt ir.. w �'''t.11.1.04, .3 4'16°6'I'. : t w kW.i6't cl {i➢ y-- ' ("."� r t'' "� t gi _ _ , - t t `+t 11.1P. .Ib. ► 7 ii F .i _J*,tiwa I,p,,,it tU.rrt I lint ... .. .... ) 1:L'' , ,, ati* I I e a t"s4, `� , t°��! ri �,K � « �'� rr�j� ,r„w,,,J, u'�J�;u',�..�,.....+r'�� y L o /��(� E • i� iii• Z Ince i'".`” sT. ;t*+ !'k* , . I". 3L K +t y ;,, 1' • i,tAI ..i�,'W IT �y 0 t , •l . pati."'"` # „,0*a4 i A t111it11TtIeYG ..• T'�'. . 1,."` ;r„ 111 11 I 1 .,, ' ' I i ut,64 '`, llrlli i t t —� .~ e ft v l F� M w. ,1 tea. ALL'ERNATiVE SOL.. TION `,� Three alternative solutions have been developed for the Planning Commission to consider. Each Tipp?,aonehes the problem in a dilffereri't manner, and provides a possible solution for the circulation needs of the area in keep+ing'Ow!'th the objectives` - and assumptions made in each case. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT NONE OF THE ALTERNATIVES ANTICIPATES 1ntl9EDIATEMAJOR' , CONSTRUCTION EITHER ON EXISTING STREETS OR OF NEW STREETS. 'THE ALTERNATIVES DEAL WITH POSSIDLE LONG-RANGE SOLUTIONS. Note: Numerical figures next to streets Indite, projected average daily traffic, (ADT). ' ALTERNATIVES la,.ANND lb Objective: Provide 'icor future local'traffic circulation needs wl,thout the construction of any'major new facilities.', Assuniptions: 1. All Ikrcreases in traffic volumes will be absorbed by the existing street system and Its extensions, • 2. Thattr�it Is feasible, to rrndify the exleting streets to some degree in order to increase'their capecity and relieve congestion. (Vicierileg, construction of left-turn lanes, removal of parking, etc:) •, Alternative la ce its capacity, and signalized at, Highway 99W.. Nota*: assumes that Gaarde Street will Alternative lb remoties.Gaarde from the collector estrev streetnetworkand assumes that no mejor improvements or 'sig',. l'ratl- ization Will be made on It. Additionally, 121st Avenue would be extended to connect With Bull Mountain Road, and the alignment of walnut Street: at Tiedeman would be improved. ., , :: la . „,.,„ ........ -:-',.,..;, :s-roptl . •M F 0,-. ,V g,pptte, • k', ?.7; f. 1.5.,. J's Ti6Att0 In ."♦s kcr ¢1g riK r 4*' 11141114',�, lb. ...� `• !LIyS;1:t{1" " 0 is B`/^� js.00 tJy r t ri,osL tta�i� ,♦''.'*` +`Ltt�ttr{°tbt. ;yt g.,,t,. p L tAl.t ,w •' °yy ?*' ,.. r ,:��#: '.yid` � fn c',} $fix ♦`� tell �.1, TieAee is :ttMr`+ "" `A. . .k• 2 i .I ,4J° d'iir/1'AIl✓,rr"�, Aizt sics+t �t "' f 10s I, sib.;GAI.4.4''.nC. tor rig t. �' e Iii .1,, i j ?5GYJ a j�.> INtipt5>~ is�, ;' t/3e5-1mw� s'e� +ti1 i ,`4',♦�`'` 'BULL, i� ... , M *�i1M1Elg t, gs., a.l♦C. tt{N,Y» "O :,-.....,...,0140. aIII, rSt'IritIt ,�,, Y.,` =0 onein.w.compfeenos, miiiiiiiiiiiiiii . .«` iliiiiiiiiilililiilsiillii;lillliiiiitltili[iiiiilliiiiiiiillr�, -rye ,,. ° .y - ♦ , MI��.t11''j ._. isA1ZDE • '1ti1,tmMAAIRidfIRD1A i td .��,+i pi ,�+ C'{., ' 'y ��. '1Z Srsi +w1w Mililiiliilitliliiiliiitiitiliiliil7iilillililll.liiiilmiliiiitiiilii{ t ll 2 . SCALA )" '1OQ' -- ►' '12 q. AL `ERNA"1'.I`VE 2 Objective« Select a corridor for* a collector :street which wili'l, provide an efficient link between S`cholls Perry Roadd and Highway 99W.' .y_., Assumptlons: 1. The increast: of local traffic,on the existing' col lectors system will be reduce4, principally Gaarde; Walnut a4d 121e.t. . O,i rest connections between thenew' +of lector Meet and the e�tisti`ng network i"ti i 1 not be made. 'irtiproy - e ' hints to existing';streets will be't.equired to handlefuture tra,fftt volumes. T'hrett traffic lanes in the* futue,e.wilt be necessary on 12,ist and 135th north of Walnut. Ail okhelr streets will reinain two lanes,' 1. The new collector street will be built coincident with the development of land in the areal, with a ,mi,nlwitum'of impact on existing developer ret and et Mitiletuiti. publ is 'east,. ' dote: .TiriA, a1 ter nat.tvei tonmonly known as the 15th Avenue E ttensi'cana had been recommended to the Tigard 'Platint ig • Coomtissitlr by 'taF0l, The Tigard planning omaIsston .hes in twrr'nM, rr:commety+ded:#��' to the iaity Countli fo inclusion into the OPO 3.Neighborhood Plan. AL i ttCPIA 1 i v r; S , ' Objective: $elect a corr•lcor fora iectar street which can efficiently acct late no.th••soutir movement, and tyhich I., ,�11l primarily serve the newly developing areas on Bull Mo'�unta'i'i) and those immediately to' the noirth in the `� vicinity of 135th Avenue and Walnut street. Assumptidns: 1. iTraffie. rxrvemr:nts generated in newly developing areas should be kept frays" itreacting already developed !; ;areas. of 2. The street will he built coincident with the devalopt+atit, of land tar the alreab wilth a aarlollrwim of impact `' on existtoo develorr•?ent and Pt minimum public expense. ' im roveevents toexis.ing collector streets will 4 3. p , also be +accassrar�� to h�,ndYe future traffic volumes. ,4 121st Avenue nod 135th Avnuewnorth of %fainut will require three •traffic lsrrelt, elf ether streets wi 1l reci! ire two lanes. T2 '; •'. 1'' -...,2.,,,,ip -ruDti , i .. ,�� AREA b . ImpRovED ,, ...=.1,„."'C .71 NTLRcCGT1GN t . s �s 7I ',5.'i T14'�ao y: s ' `41' */),•rr��ilrr� !ii 4 V q. ., � �a-IRE � ' p' 1► WAL14 .. ,\ ya9u F04.mCtz ,�. . •'•fi r* '. r 1 •• 'G -w c r,oet,'S � ✓��.... 0 i �� '....''''..;%4,'`' � 1'� AF , «( ',•� ,.1�111111•H�i`+'l'4t11,1 , AFZEA �. x �.�' ,+:'`t ,,,� BOtl IJ``�AQ �` 1� N ?3...•'. f 7.-. Ott ! . - I •x, . ,,,,,,t4' ti� l; . : , ' r1 DAkO'TA �` • q� GAA Rtr;,r G: .mow b � = - s a. w �'_ I `rt r.11hb BULL 1�l�f� R `' a � .. s r o W /• 111 a g „ 71 t N '' //3171 1.. I v >,. tf'i"l�:r ,,.��` qtr: rr, S 'f5o0 l',",Y E ,ON 6` e �C i 1 ° ,'-i t E E ' '`,"` , t ,� 811111111111111111111111111111(111111111111111111111ii111i1111h111111111111!• �� '� . ', •�•�,'" Dov ifs FO4rMf 14 , . `, ' Ei\I DATIGN �-' ''r,' + . l�PO � 1�.ECOM , -1-1GARp . 'LANNIN.G1 COMVII6ION RGOMEI'JC1AT10�1 g r ,•,' 0 CAS RbG,,.: .> Nr .. BULL iR n' ''• `� ,, ice`''' .,1 . , 11 �. wn 55od w. ; ems . . $C•A� 1=-,i000 gI11iuliutit11iiiiilliIi11111i1111iii111111t1111111iiiiiii1111iixiiiil11111ft • REC ME DATIONS The ilaIlli tr;q beper c`Works be,partment Staffs will mai(e the following ' g jotr�t recomtnendaklort:s to toe trrientand Pub1t� ffs Washington tounty Planning Chmnits,,' Ion: I. collector street should be developed in the'future along the corridor destrtbed' by Al terriatve 34, A p 2" A poi toy requiting, that sections of t1tts street be constructed as an Integral part of the tde:velotl,`,,eht, of pre°pewty ' in the corridor .Chould be adopted, 3.:' That the following destbn and ctevelopl,x1nt str,ndard's for the street be c4loptted: a, t urb tO curb section itcivai to 40 feet. . 1 b. nominal rnttght-of.,wa,y etival to '60 feet( inciuding sidewalks and public utttity 'easer nti 1i1ote: Slopes 41, cur~ve easements Ipti i i be re11,ul'red where dictated by ttipoaraphy M ) C. lIecdtm4ended sped not'to'tatceo:d 35 tiph. d. Maxlrium slope of ftndshed ,'oadwa ' not to exceed eight per cent exct;ptiw,it-± , ,,, TR Fir' ANALYSISTABLE. 1990 1'F.,O EEC`T.ED STREET 1976 COUNT AVERAGE:'DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)* SW Gaa rile .`,4, East of 121st 1,904 7,500 • 001North of Highway 99W 3,073 11,000 SW 121st Avenue III north' of Gaarde 1,9011 7,30Q South; of Walnut 2,381 7,400 ci,,,' North of Walnut 3,126 Plz.107c,TioNc 1\17,600 SW Walrtwt Street EX1T%NG, A' NET W'0Gi11( ' West of 121st 2,554 5,9001 East of 121st 4,75$ 6,000 West :If Fonner 4,070 6,500 1 SW Bull rlountair„ Rn)ad • West of 1;t3rd ,2,21S 5.500** , ; East of /33Fd 2,296 6,500** - Wes o'r ka�1-,, ,vey 99W 2,725 7,000 6 .. h.l x+ r '.•�.Y„1 ..2 {, ,d r'.. • ,l 1. r.•. ...... � ', *Based on Carl H. Buttke repr.,rts Traffic Circulation NPO No.. 3, April 16, 1975. **Washington County Public Works D partmen:t prtsjectionw 1 i ' DEQ 7 �.vN �� W �� .,y BULK RATS ;' ADMINISTRATION BLDG U.S. POSTAGE ,A:', 150 NORTH 1§r AVENUE PAID `• tI" , .HILL B R , ORE. 97123 . W I LLS6OROOR ' ''rroi1r. , PERMIT NO :, rr E:1/ D.) il (? :) d j'\ 4 " S` 1 ,a 1 NoTicE (..)F . , , , , U ' LIC I R NG ' dl .,, ....,..„ , 1 NbTItE, IS IIERESY OI'WEN THAT THE tIA�1tlNliTOt# COUNTY FLANNiNt CO10N1$StoNAT ITS.MEETING ON.VtbNtSbAY4 JUNE 29,, IB71' AT 0 7.0J FM, IN BOON 402 or THE AhMINISTRATION tUtLOiNG DF THE WASKINGTBN. COUNT tOUBTNOUst ComPLEX4 15b NORTH, FINST , .,'' :, AVENUE1411„LtilOati,IORECON,, WILL CONSIBEB TNN EOLLCWIHO ITER ,..j t lttINBER: 77.21,8w .wk NORTHEAST BULL MOUNTAIN C ICIJLAIa11I S''.tub I Y e :M. a'' THIs FuOLIC RARING CO"tCE01, Cbt°,Hutiltr DEvELOtHENT AND 'tA,A, $POIITATION POLItIEs Ul.litfl'ARE''OEIND PROPOSED POTI, `AAFFtb. rx c OF THE CITY OF ,:ASH tNOT0N COUNTY. TIE AREA FOR WHICH TIiCS. ' WOULD AFt4t9 I S COI. IiakO WHBLI.Y' 1 3 34, , E POLICIES i iR JLACIb11 IN' Cu1t IGt,bJS A.R:AS T1bi`,F1b A1iD `".: TA WITHIN �� , AtND �1S BF 1"15, J1IW W�, ANIk 'StrC"il��ts �w �3, �, S, ti. g. • , up 10 B t8'S, RtW, W.H. 'tHE AREA UNDER STUB' •IS SHOWN UN THE ACCOH.PAHY1NB MAP. • I 'i THE EUBLIC HEARING ON TH $:'MATTER WILL 'tit CONBJOTtB ;IN.AOCOOOANCE WITH THE RULtS OF oROCEDUhEs OF THE PLAIIMIHG CG I$1131GN, ,ANY 1EI4SBNI N VINO INTENEST #N TIS HATER MAY ATTEND AltO'.BE HtApO. OR, TESTIMONY'hOIY Or SUBI`ITTEB IN ! r 1, , uoi T1NB TO OE E 1TEREB INTgf RE:.BRt 1W THE INITIAL 1HEAP.INO. ONLY TII 1SE Prf * WHO ES Nt 0BAL 011 WRITItII .6;'', IESTIMOIIY HAY r ATICIPATt ; JTUIIt HCARINOS ',"HOULD /HIS IA,TTEA `OE APIA'«t1.LE0, A EURrHEk; ta4Eb11 t1DN., F1. tt COhlAc1 ' ': Tilt 4�ASHINOTOU, (01JNtY.P.LANNIN OEEANTMENT AT 44i5.-t1 : '51,.. . ,, • 0 - ..._ ,.___,...4..,,,,,,, ,�....,,,., «�1mno-s, .. "„""'r. ,. ,,!°' .N-111,. 4 _ ILL 4 REG, 'ED LI� JUN 231977 CITY OF TIGARD , June ?3, 197 Tigard City Council Tigard, Oregon RE: Mayor's Proposal for 135th Street extension In view of the mayor's ma or s recent proposal for the 135th Street extension and the changes from the NPO'splan, t re:spectf��l1y request tht the NPOr have an opportunity to review his ideas before any action is taken. ..r We have worked with th.e county, CPI and concerned residents to form t what we fee`i is a workable plan. Some of the mayor's proposals are in direct conflict with what the NPO has re4uested and what is now part of the comprehensive plan which was adopted by City Council. Because ►:" this, I strongly suggest that t.he, City Council provide the w�, 9 NPO with exactthe mayor's proposal con L k and that we be given the.. opportunity s 1 sts. a information on what to review and comment on this r proposal . Fespectfully submitted R G. Kluempke Chairman, NPO #3 d � � ' 4 v , y .. ,_ ( r .. I =' MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION June 21, 1977 - 7: 30 P.M. ; Pag o Neil Peterson, applicant 's engineer, stated they bad been under the impression that they would only have to improve to the property line, rather than extending the road to S .W. Fairh aven o Commission discussion on the road extension. o Nicoll and Wood stated that it Was not their intention for the developer to pay for an off-site improvement of S.W. Fairhaven . Wood moved and Nicoll seconded that the condition to improve the street to S.W. Fairhaven be removed, The motion wasapprovedin favor. and Wood and Sa- with four kata abstaining. 6. 3 Staff presented a proposal by Howard Glazer to change his p development from two story units to one story, three Tanned bedroomto two; and one large parking lot to two small lots o o Nicoll objected to lack of back doors and access to open areas. ; o Wood statedthat more variationn to the face and backs of the units should be ez courag ed. Wood moved and Goldbach zecondea to revise the architecture t cy alleviate the linear barracks facia and to Provide rear access Themoti �nwas approved �y unanimous voice vote, 6,4 Staff informed the board of, C;i t Council action on the 185th Street extension y �','�od movedand T e edlno seconded that the Planning Commis-is- slot request of the City Council that any revisions of the NPP #3 trafiic circulation, plan which embodies substantial 1 changes from the-request made by NPO" #`8 be sent back for p 'ric hearing by the Planning Commission,F The motion was approved by unanimous voice ; vote. 6„b ity Council hearingJuly11. ) Y 6,6 Staff presented. two .letters, one from Tom Whittaker and l uther from Yvonne Addmngto . in regard to changing the d e- � signation for a piece of land in NPO 5 ^ a`�Dk7QU.-tuAt T* 11:45 P.,M ti ✓J 4/1) 6, 1977 MAY WILBUR BISI,sOP'3PROPOSABS DR `{ 135th AVENUE &' MURRAY BTJVD. EXTENSIONS 1 I recommend elimination of(both so-called 135th and/or MurrayBlvd. extens.tors thhrouuugh the western side of the t/,r'b3 K r.w Tigard4 area. 2. In place of these proposals, I suggest a 'net--work of residential- oriented streets iar the future develop meat of the acreage to the west of Tigard and along the northerly slope of Bull Mt. 3. This reaidential street grid would utilise the continuation of major existj;►rig streets thereby keeping costs to all taxpayers ana new home owtgrs at a minimum. MY Proposal i.s to contiue 135th, as a residential developed street, in its southerly direction up the northerly slope of Bull Mt. to Bull Mt. Road connection,. Gaarde should be continued, as a residential connector street, in tts westerly direction to a future connection with 135the 114th is already a dedicated street between Gaard.e and Bull Mt. e. ueci R i through the Ames de telopment Road. 12�} st Avenue w ould c � to connect with Bull Mt. Road with a lateral street running through and somewhat parallel,to Bull Mt. Road runnir through the Ames development from 121st through the Edwards development then turning south up tie slope of Bull Mt. to connect with Bull Mt. Road. The minor i.,c.t ernal street system for the area then bounded by the 135th and 12 .ct street continuations and the existing Bull Mt. Rd. and Scholls perry Rd,. should be developed property as thein th:,s area is ready or glade available for d eve'opment. By this continuation of oxisting', streets under residential collecg,or' standards and by making aailable z,urers.w ai: =ale ntxr-cnA`cect3ng residential streets, nc one street' will have t bear the burdendng traffic load or through traffic c rigi.nating frost Pacit 1d Righway. 4. Murray Blvdo extension should follow a route west of Bull Mt. and connect wit ,pa :i "ic , near Sherwood, Which in turn should conne t with a future bypass route froM 1-5 in Tualatin to this point on Bac.-11w . near Sh#rwo od,. This, v'ou' d complete a. full b,S''-pass of Tigard and relieve a�iucb� of the Rwy. 9 traffic that is choking-up Hwy. 99 through Tig rd 5, with this type of solution, the resit'ntiai street system 1 have prouosed, should be ab`b to ,angle o � 8w region ata local trafffic problems well into the 21st century. U \v .,,w• y.4.�.4"..-�.-+. A,«..n�«:w�W.n wi;F.t i.r.•.�_ Mlh:w.N....qr•A.X41"."'YY...�L�.et..�:?A.I�M........1�.+--.ia.-w�S.+..��auA��,...,i; .n...ri#.If�NM.iA,..uL1..Na+......�:..?'"a. ti:�.1+G''L`.iY:NL� �..,�,.. _ ...+ _ "l=..� ..:.U%tiu^c.r„w.,:.a�;z.t..,.a.�.:�.+..wa:;r -,•�i.*:i.+sn..,.ws.:r�.,..�......«W+,,.,.:�r.,..�..,,...w.A`0..w.r.u.:l.w+.wlxr�u«w,..,aw..�„ +r - 1 r ,I•IJ /1• ] �., e.«, .'..+ r .1_1_, -- „,,,,,,,k.,'„, `e ¢ '`- S.. 1�1 • ^�' is r•'r`I ''� '-'''''‘,4, "ty�tir�.rypa y. ,�1 w `t - ji I I I "1'..'rr...:.! `1 ..) ;tA,y '1', *H"asr 'r►w, ,, L.,,,:,....„4.--- i I M 31 1,,,^,: 5 N r-;„S-�/ ' ,x «,..r,. t l. ,r// •':- r ” j I rl 4 y r�` ._....• --1----' _ 5T,7.. * ... : Y - : = .] . 4tn,o -� 5U4�I,q gyp -.4(7-.5'—'r r lye, 1 (/a� iq� I I sr .t ^ , «� ' 'W TIG.1J0 .W... .5T..—... tfir'" ;t` r.1 +frill C ,)1,+ 1.�....„.: --1•r.. � .z.._' ; ,, c 1 I i :I7 s w ' ''� (1 3 } n'•(,,•'u r r;Il)) a1 I 4i°IS u',14.w t `r 34 I i3 v -+;..? r , atw 1 1 • '1, , +3.1.,S4 SW .+1.' w n \a Y �r•�,` � tU 1 « a'A”+T )1 to t o 'V. d,r r K ..t.,{ AYH(,r-4 .,y`a -�A N`.!, (. ;.. )7t'N 1 n, ,ry ".,u ...,.?4,,,,, ✓" .3 rt ,it..L 'Q - *t' '3.),.;r �. K,*,,, C...r ,,'+v+ill „ yi i,,l'r?t_J 'fir>ry ; . 'p "";:i L.,' r .1.,Y'.. ,r i{, �. +t t.+,r -yM '.7S.�{, 6T � � ,f• ..w�rl '4p Cr 6 ..,14:t s /� ,ti ,M KAp'• , y,; e�., ./.•, - '�.'.. •L.... [4,,,� T n 1A{M4.4k Y L•' L•- t' 111 W is "' P•t. k .*11:•:.•-e .«-...,,..,., 1 t4 J' .' § 1 r y./r I L. W t. Y . (( w 1 e ,.......1.::),„,:,i,',, \S'C 5 3 .....1, SN Rtli' R: '�1r # < " ' 1 HEP .. Pl .k N 4�': ,4 c ooi4s4, ol .. t"— ,,,,' 1 o''''' i;c4,,I, 4 7\c:',...,,,, , 0 1 ^I }• �'!1 .� �Al.a.,. 1'.r� 41 7W `_ ,{r QE124r„ ,.Vi,•Yn.�.• y i;'''''',.;'' �; ` ,k, i I w ..r-�----- b a tel"_- —� r CIC;�. • 1r 1 1 / , o- ii, i n-1 I.Cl.M7k r y. ^4 },. - j e' (/ / i/&r r bort. My�, cl, cr rt r',grrA_K , 1J 11' titva"aut, * Y H141•4. 4/ r a� r��4 a .1 I V r ' ,,,,,t,',*.. I III > 3 3 it, Hr.r.. . ,,,,,T.r$,-.....:ei[pp , s,.,/4 t = *1 i > , - 4., „,,, ,, . .W ,,.,..., f I to r ” #>.. .'t i Ry t Y Sw n r x � 1« ii w 1 ' .. s.. I' ,,,i � " `-•^ L+1 i w ^ *orN' - ....- �w�-"" r,-.." k sl ,«:..1. }i ��t 'om- ,--- � - w I�r a :urf � ...� art , x' .11‘,...1s ^( '' a,. i pk.ur»yrs .. rs►ai, .=....`7...,',";',.:-, -,-:1'.,t' �;✓✓ 1 fie* Z,! „,,,,,,,,,,,,„,, ,� ��,,,�+'-y`r r' J/� .j �'.1G�l�N;'Lkt,k k�ki't , t 'y �b Cr?r."v, us ' �,.w„! «<.«,,,.;mo w wi' it � 4 o✓N 3''J. t' r' 1..,....,:„'..."7. 4+Ip,„: 1N t't Ir y,est . ,►k� w , w , 2,....,.., ,, r �( y ' 'D G s {.. ,' i Yw,u.u.1 1. Y.f' aw w>+ r �a~ Jf,1 ...„1„,,, / y . �. '" t) d fir, r If, �.. ;It Ir .- .,1-,-,° r 4 i.,„ ir ,, , . ,, .„,, .., ,, „ 4.' W f 1 1 t'*1,'k a i)ro. , { 4 1 � J iw �I It ..1,L ,, '; r 444 .,IMS . 4.-il ' ` ., 1 l” sy. ,t- r dII Ifr s 1 ; I i ''; f µ - ntt.�,r, L.�. ;I'A 144 ''i 4a7 ') . 1'rl,IL,u*, t''i «µ N.« I .t i c.,,M, a r . t''rw,'��, x 'r, A „,•,1 1'h * �',) , .. I�, • " A,: 'w'w✓i r«I',..,p.C 11 .,N..rt' Vii, ' c(,4,,,,•I , l i rt'E M� I + •' I "r N ^ Yy., 411., 7.' 1.1 t a, . i�iyrc"&,r=. A't4s,4�** 4 ,,,..4,- x m:ii .1.,w'7 [g+. { !1. so f` i,: `, I,+t+E. ^..fir',,,;y ,I x w .'r• 1++w..! ' +,"�i4 R 1.<; h,,4°'�'14 r f rw»i^,,w«r*�7S.s+. I,. ,,e 1 h* „, w ..,,,,.,..,,-,- 1't i,„,,, ,`, NI '' �� 1 X14� 1 ., i . +°' I June 6, 1977 MA.YOF _ `ILBUR BISHOP'S PROPOSALS ON S BblE T,� a I 135th AVENUE & MURRAY BLVD. 1 . I `recommend elimination of both so-called 135th and/or Murray Blvd extensions through the western, side of the Tigard4 area. d- tial- place proposals, suggest a net-work 2. In 1.rce of theseI oriented'' streets for i the future development of the acreage to the west of Tigard and along the northerly slope of Bull Mt. 3T his residential street grid would utilize the continuation of major existing streets thereby keeping costs to all taxpayers and new home owners at a minimum. My proposal is to continue 135th, collecit.o r + developed, street, > in its' southerly d.'rectior up as a residential ,l� the northerlyslope pe of Bull Mt. to Bull Mt. Road connection. Gaarde ehould, be continued as a residential collector street, in tts westerly direction to a future connection with 135th *PiA , .P� ..p."os i„' .. ..- ,y„.. , -? •. .., :J :. .v J: ,,;_ s ` ;^tit k ri..,..x, « , Y ` � . s Avenue ould 4a through the Ames development to connect with Bull Mt. Road with a lateral street running,¢'r-arw, thy, Es - ''� g hrou h and' somewhat parallel.gto Bull Mt. Road running through the Ames development from 121st through the Edwards development then turning south up the, slope of Bull Mt. to connect with Bull internal street for the area then Mt« Road. The minor system bounded by the 135th and 121st street wind the r p �� existing Buil mt. Rd« and Scholls Ferry Rd.,, should be developed as the property in this area is ready ora the available for p By continuation . ` existing etre i=ts under development. ,_ � thi con unua residential collector standards and by making afailable numereus gstreets, residential, . -connecting no one street inter cohnec`�zn will have to bear the burdening traffic load or through traffic originating from Pacific Highway. 4. Murraylvd. extension should follow a route wes y . t of Bull and conneet with Pacific Ewy. near Sherwood, which in turn should connect with a future bypass route from I.,.S in Tualatin to this peinton Pac.-Hwy. near Sherwood.. This'iuro`ul,d (.r10ri1plete a ful,l. by-Pass of Ti.ga d and, relieve much of the rlwy. 99 traffic that is ch.okii g-up /1wyi- 99 through Tigard. 5. s type of ,;soluti residential street system l have with theo , `n �,he reside ... pro osee should be 6.1:% to hai.dle our SW region A.tid :Local traffic pr ol.e1 s well into the 21st center, . I , ' 1f :. ,->....w ,. .:,: ..-«.....ssm;..w,,,...«..a:,.,u...•.,+._,,.,...,,..tom»,+., .,L.-, ._.1d..,..,.s,,,,,..,,,,,,,a., , „,,a....4,4,„4,.:++4xx;.rcurc,,:44Harv..,:;i,.,,,,,....r.. :...1,rm...44 ...1,., :.. ,,...,,,,,,L,: .,.,1s.,...4,µ ...4,«t? .P j. 4 : 4. t rh.rol ,'' N. k' ,' . . 1 ' , .1.. . ,#.0'...P7..,. ... A_ is% A , t'.i•tt''''; ; .'-',,r'-''''-. °' ' ''''''' . BOU.N[3' R ' tU s a r _ .,.. 14,...m ^r e r 4 r~ .. . " .M � elo • t � :' 1 'w I1GA t d,. s , F . f . ,t S to {-.4, i,{„f y fiat, - AV 447 i t”` C9 ,. ,i'4.°*'(**.14'' '1,,,' V\i'Al-- ' --?-'''' •'' ' b°144 .t6P''''?' 1'' ,,,,,,11:0'". . ��+'"* ii '''''''''-"*",,..-.-.•,,-.,',,...r, n..,'''. `W�srr;.a°`3''='''4 �„�. Ii.t FON'.� ,�,• .44 ,G•. '�,. •'►f",/i1;, w,w ii.. ., t i, , 1 l'-:'''''-': ,Mrv,Ty.y ,� Yi 'Tnils � .+�� d` yy.y,yy ��}} 1�J K4 ': a,,,� , 1�•.nry/.',,4,' iµ, .yam.. , . ,t. - riwccl "x`55�`'v. ,i,..• WIF ✓•'" .,h4 tl11"R7a1 .1"•,,. li dfir',, ix)i. ,,v !r^� ' ,,s, � 4 '�qr µnor ��.► , trues ' i, Iwo, ,..,r•te, '" ""' x,,, A"�. 4.'4 CAA.A`: ii/ goo `'t . **'''' q' !y 4.' "9 ""l = t ',,ffy 0'W$*kc.-, a a..T4y`v i11";i s "1,�, , '� 'ey �,$ �{�gitlf'^'.".. r .1Ntt , a �hti� —w, , 5300 = '.3.'' ,' p • '>l � , .a "S',I .+m1 .-'f=t.._ ti� ya{i-� ,r,t4a44 r,,„,,, ` ,,;.j , 'h " w r q� " y • ., , w* yL',4.'* � + i 0 04 rw� '...3..., {"'.. �M3i• rfi1C' 't�k* t6"'a'.*'rFu ',fake;iej '+fF ay «+w .. C1 \ ,,,„ , 1 A.LE H a000 , 1 :SC. . t 1 _ 4 ,� II u , y 'Mai �) ,, r,a) City Attorney state he h.wl volunteered to privately prepare a proposal, on heha.'tf of Off>cers Wheeler and Killipn, and submit it to the insurance company. ' Bailey furtrher stated the proposal had been rejected. 1b) Discussion by Council, staff and Officer Wheeler regarding alte,',rnati ves for puts1.4ing case and the cost of filing a lawsuit. , 1',.: 1 Cott nci,lman Wakem stated he -was opposed to considering the case further. 1,. '...d, C,,..7sensus of the majority of Council present was tt', review transcript; ' case a-ndccnsder matter further at future meeting. SANITARY FRANCHISE HAULERS { Council directedstaff to prepare ordinance, regarding increase in hauler ' s1 for consideration by Council at their June 13th regul Ar meeting. Council t,r1,�tk,,.�r requested staff provlde them with any background information required to ma1Ce. decision. "C " P� Iii ��J� GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATING TO135th STREET EXTENSION ENSTON i, M4) City Administrator reported staff had advised several people that thepresent rIiscu ,sio,►n .as not a public hearing, therefore testimony would not be received by Cc• ;nc i l,y 'l.a C,,.f,'n,:,il d sparticipate gcussed if NPO III' and CPO (members were to artici pate in meeting. "r $. : ..s was to limit discussion to Council and staff. \,, / Pg.1,,.�01',g, Director reported on County's activities regarding proposed extension ,--r~;d t:hr Jare., 29th public hearing. Darr.-V:,ttc» '°eviawed; (1) traffic study prepared by County; (2) alternatives pro- ped by Ccur,ty, and (3) June 6th meeting with City staff and County. L d' M3Y.°t B.rsnop presented a proposal to develop a network of residential streets for f� t rI:e developrn r.t of the acreage°'west of Tigard along the northerly slope 3 1 r. a s.l disc'u sion by Courncit and staff regarding alternate routes, traffic 1 i:.-.pa,:t a ,d concerns with through traffic to Pat,if c Highway. r , `° ' Ce,e- i l directed staff f to request County to coAduc t: traffic study on Mayor's prcpos @ «r Council requested information be privided to them prior to the June 29*h nea,ri,cg at the Coullty, 1 1 , ' ',. PARK AD OPEN` SPACE PLAN AND PROPOSED PARK SITES , t Citi Administrator. advised Council item was set, for publichearing at the a ;,,41r t." 134'‘h me ting* lr ; . 1. nh ��.x� � �"�wt Planner reviewed proposed plan and park sitemap 4ssA ;tent. Planfr:er submitted letters, from Mr, & Mrs, Palaske, 505 S,W, Westwood Drive aad Mt*. Chapman, iia50' S.W. 95th Ave, , in opposition to two specific p, pew$e{d park ,i tes. A`, p wti t ion, from property owners on 1O8th was submitted, opposing park site , • p Mop sed on S.W. 10E1th. Assistant Planner Stated site had been removed from *, r' rh id(,ra t i.onw 1 ° i,,, 1 Cour :i 1. t Lonsider request by park Board members) regarding mettt:bership and. :at endan e, at their 'Jure 20th study session, R 0 r V.•.i.,w O :..«"d1 ttT S TANU,A-S,SMS EW•�NT 8 Ri:iPORL �. 1,1" e`"1.ky kd.m.lr'istrator �teported status of me(4tbags with a sub titbtitrilittee of the 777 f t{ C1,I ST.0y' ESSI+O . MiNl.TES JU'I'1E 6 197/ i p ti h y1h1 w-.:.'w....,1..;:„,._,_.a ,,.a ;, .,a,.:,..a«a ....r,...., ..»;...~r,.,,r I..k....,.,'...,��......h.+„ ...,.-.,,r,..,t ,.5,,. ,.t...,,.u'., ..a.., .a c .-11 . - sx:. ut•rt.. � 0 0. .„ 3, Public Testa, L ve , Proponents Martin E 'ger t, Developer, 'rummari;.ed argument , pevar of deve3,6p 2tig proposed, site. Opponents: Don Feller, 97\65 S. W. Frewing Street 4. Director recommended approval '\,sul.)ject to a 5 foot right.-gff-'way dedication and agreement to Participate in. Aocal improvement district. s. Hearing closed. 0. General discussion, by Council and staff, 7. Motion by Councilman Waken, seconded by I,ouncilman.. Coop, denying appeal and upho,ding Planning Commission°s action. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION - (135th Street Extension) NPO III ' —=' Request by NPO #3 and the City of Tigard to amend Neighborhood. Pla #3 to provide for a street connecting S.W. Bull Mountain Read and S.W. Walnut Stl8e t/S.W. 135th Ave alongthe east side of Bull Mountain. 1. Mayor Bishop stated the City of Tigard was not requesting the amendment. 2, Public hearing opened. 3 Planning Director gave presentation. 4. Public Testi• mony: Proponents: Tonic Porter, 11875 S.W. Gaarde Dick I<luempke, 13450 S.W. Watkins Jean Haldorson 11250 S.W. Fairhaven Mr. Flowers, 11700 S.W. Gaarde Opponents:' Froude, 12.200 S.W. Bull Mt. Rd, Beverly provided Council with copies of two letters regardixlg . proposed extension Dan McCabe, speaking in behalf of Mrs. McCreight, 12035 S.W.:'Bull Mt. Rd. C. J. Selliken, 12955 S.W. Walnut Gordon Moore, 1355 S.W. 121st Gond Althea Rodde, 13745 S.W. 121st Howard Shrauger,, 13030 S.W. Walnut subn t ed letter of opposition Robert Norin, 11900 S.W. Gaarde Virginia Johnson, 12370 S.W. Bull Mt. Ind., Elsie Ames, 12300 S.W. Bull Mt, ltd. R. B. 'I►elm 13280 S.W. Walnut a submitted copses, of three lettere regarding proposed extensiOn Glenn hechtold 13825 S.W.' 121st Del Ball, 11515 S.W. 91st Steve ;Telfer, 14265 S.W. 141st, Mr. Grimes, 12640 S.W. 135th Herbert 03son, 119.10 S4 ,W Gaarde S David Edwards Z�7 , �. E. Lapine Court, O.illsbo o , 5. for cocfimented on alterna.tiVee for Meeting local trafficPlanning the n J. �y g ee.ds R I d. that on akILJG JfW 9�:7n,1.1 .J'V �.. � YV M+{ � be �addteSs i7rAg Dixeotor state traffic circulation in the .area In rues tion. 6. Heaving closed. ' PACE 5 ,: BEGtJtA1 Mt I EITING MINtJmtS, My 23, 1977 III ,, t a 7. General disc , 'ion foll +wed 8. Motion byCouncilman Wakem, seconded byCounci man Scheckla, to continue considerationat next study session on June 6th. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 12. VERBAL NOTICE OF PENDING LAWSUIT r (a) City Attorney advised Council the Oregon Home .Builders Association and the Portland Metropolitan Home Builders Association was filing suit against, the City of Tigard (within the next 10da s) requesting a declaration that the Systems Development Charge was an illegal tax. Attorneystated to t ed he would keep Council informed of any future development. 13. KUTSCH ENTERPRISES Letter of Appeal (a) Administrator called Council's attention to letter from Peter Preiskorn requesting appeal. Administrator stated he could see no public good or service to be accomplished by hearing matter again due to the lengthy ''' public input process and-past reviews by the Planning Commission and City Council. i (b) Motion by Councilman Scheckla, seconded by Councilman Mickelson, to deny request. APproved bY unanimous vote of Council. 14. RESOLUTION No. 77-55 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING AN INTERFUND LOAN FROM THE SEWER FUND TO THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEETING INTERIM GENERAL FUND OBLIGATIONS RESULTING' FRO M HUNZIKER STREET LGLiAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, PEND- INC THE SALE OF BANCROFT BONDS. (a) Administrator recommended approval. (b) Motion to adopt; Councilman Cote.,; siiconded by Councilman Wakem. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. .Z5, RESOLUTION No 777556 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING VACATION OF A PORTION OF S.W. WATKTNS PLAC :.. A 50 FOOT WIDE DEDICATED PUBLIC -O RIG' ElT F AY IN THE CII. F TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. � (a) Administrator recommended approval. (b) Motion: to adopt; Councilman Wa kem, seconded by Ca-ar.J Aman.:Cook. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 16. C ARETA:XER RESIDENCE (a) Council concluded that further consideration was not appropriate at this time due to withdrawal of offer to sell trailer house. 17. OTHER: (a) City Adminis Lrator requested authorization to pay cost to repair :damages <. caused by accidental firoarm discharge and concurrence From. Council; to k . authorize any transfers from contingency (by resolution) that, might be necessary in the next month. Administrator stated that reimbursement from, insurance would be investigated. Motion to approve; Countilman,Wakem, seconded`by Cai)r.r`x lttian Cook. App rov ed by unar.imous vo te oCouncil. PAGE '. , RE0OLAR MEETING 1,17NIITE8, MAY 23, 1977' . ,, ..,.U..._....i. _ . rc N 1,.1 20 , w 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION CITY OF TIGARD . S'AT`E OF OREGON, NOTICE iOF ..'JBLIC HEARINGS COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ss` Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Co'nncil at Fowler Junior High Lecture Roam, Joseph Ch�,fer 10865 S,W.'Walnut,Tii ard,,Oiegon,on x' .... "... .. .. May 23,'1977,at 8:00 p.m.,with resOect being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher to the following: APPEAL .,.�,�,.,. . ... The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined tionalllsus yp 1' "°to ',„L',94 condi- of x �, du- , 'Ilexes in a R- (singlefamily. iresideri � by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and tial) zone at; 9795 S.W. Frewiiig ` } sh T 'C iuntyTa Map ' ( rite that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was 2CA �iLot l(C ,CO�,dPREHEN ,EPLAN RE` 1- publishedi in,the entire issue of said newspaper for i#. . .-...,:.i.... successive and S 5tri'Street"Ext ion equest by NPO III-and the City'of Ti 7 and to.,amend Nei hborhoo Plan consec;alive weeks in the following iss�ies ..:i, ....,.:.� .,.....,�..-. ..n...•.-- I oprovide:for a g dHI street connecting SW �........i««iIii..:�«.... .-.«� Y� �7. :.. c -. . .,i ..•».# :«_ .i..a .».........i.-_. Bull 'Mountain Road ad and SW Walnut ...,. ,»w...# — r . aw . .. Mountain. side ofBu1.35th Ave,l" along t1,1 he east . .:...,. . • APPEt L, ,=- CONDITIIJNAL USE f ghat re -- , Request by Richard A.Cooper to locate a used car lot in a C3 (General Com- Subtcribed and sworn to before me this .#..... .. ...;�.._.,...... day of ...«.i..:. mercial)zone on SW Pacific Highway; north of SW Gaarde Street:(Was!iiing ton County Tax Map 2S1 3DD,Tax Lot ......:... .,.......... 19... i 1000: BY ORt►ER OF THE CITY COUNCIL =M, - Doris ]Iartig, City Recorder ......:�.. ., ." t' :L ...... .. crr 3193 Publish May 11 18 197 7)ilio of Oregon 7) Y. } y commission expires .i««ice, .. ' , . 19.. s • t Y i.. I . I ! * 4 l s - l r , , ...[. ..,. .. .\ ,,,„...,4,..,/ec, „,,,,,-6,-,'-'---(,7--,--i_,,,,..,,--te" STAFF REPORT ! .- TIGA.RD PLANNING COMMISS( .1 ...-G v..,,2` ', �,,)1' ,c,-! tz- a..� ' . , '� AGENDA 5 .2 march 29, 1977 - 7: 30 Pm. Twality Junior 'High Lecture Room � ` " aAvenue Tigard, OregonAp. .� ,, 14650 S.W. 97th Av k ‘,..•. ---,.,�•_ ,2 >7,1",e' 6 DOCKET:;_ CPR 1-77 4' -e...-6„, ,L ,•!�-, —r '�-- 4"✓+cry f. REQUEST: Amend NPO #3 Plan to include a corridor alignment for S.W. 135th, Avenue , FINDINGS: • _ version s i - NPO #3 plan as adopted 'oy ' ounci'l in The f nal of the December of 1 l5, recommends that further study be _lyen to the ' need for a traffic connection between Scholls Fery Road and W ,„,,,4,471/ Pac;i f�-c�... �, . I. y . p it refers to the various proposals '��a S eci:ficallyy' for a souther�l e Lension of. Murra Blvd. wiclz have b e proposed )6(4) over. 04 the last few years. . ,... �' vr^l`��` „,. 2. Numerous meetgs have been condu,ctg.. -.involving the affected public dam” agencies �4r„shnWgton County, CRAG, and the Oregon Stade Highway Division. it . en involvement has been provided through several �,treeti.ngs of NPO 8 on. this subject and three workshop meetings - in February and March of this year, attended by appointed sub- committee members from the CPO #4 and NPO #3. The result of this study has been a shift in emphasis p from a regional g`onal arterial facility to a local collector type street. The Murray Blvd. extension alternative was eliminated due to the apparent political and pra;'..tical infeasibility, of ever constructing such a facility. The Washington County Plan sing staff and the city staff haveworked jointly on this projec,,, and the selected, corridor is the st as... choice of all parties involved, 3. , The joint N'Pd-CPO Committee arrived at two conclusions: ;I 1 . That continued de�ve:lt .nment' of the vacant land along the 0 foothills of :Bull Mountain re uii.res the srovision of an additional neivhbor1iood colle tor_.,,street to serve 1,,ileeothis new development and minimize tthe resultant traffic imp`"'b-ts upon the exists rig net hbr r i•lod street system (Gaarde, 121st an. Walnut) . 2. That the corridor selected (see attached exhibit) most t ��on' ob ec s adheres to the iollo�`�.�a _;route sel.eo �. clo of ,�. ��.: yg ,�. ,.:yr_. tines, _1zDesign a facility to standards which would not attract I additional regional and commercial vehicle trips while serving the locally generated traffic as an efficient link to Schol l s Ferry Road and Pacific R,ighwaY. 2. Relieve Gaarde Walnut t Bull Mountain Road. and 121st of a major portion of the traffic which will be generated • by future development in the ?`SPO #3 area. 84 Minimize the environmental impacts resulting from road. cuts fills etc ;{ ,.W.,..w x..a..,. e..1 J..1 n...,.'.d ..,.,a..:.�.""'1-..-.l Y..,....w hk:tu.a.-+,-la,.0 al v-..a. ,s,. vW:.x4x...,.,..w-..,4.m4..L::.w..J..,.. ..aau.-,.i.tFf .•M.d.liYJ.d"4.1L-..+ ,,:+i,.MY ..41..xav..,4.;1S.YA.U.+-ti+fA:n.ii4..,m�,.x�+'r, M+'4!'w _ } v STAFF REPORT ,. ,, ,, G O MMISS Y'� t ��OAR _ .'- , ' �- ; r�" � PLANNING N,� C � � I�.k* March 29, 1977 1' f' Page 2 4. iginirriize the effects upon existing development. , 5: Accomp,iish at a minimum of public expense and avoid the necessity of public right-of-way condemnation f; where feasible. - The t pe of facility ' reposed is a. neighborhood collector having k` twlanes o.- traffic 'a'Tida, i l foo r-.g t-of -ciay dth. As is '� ' evident from the objectives listed above,; the major purpose of_ iJx.orty, i s to provide a direct route int9 .s ..::. �.. � orho � s _�,. �: outof the this fac�,l_ a c enera .v develc� menu out, of ne ghb O "for tra g in this area To a lesser exte +. p of share I nt, is ro��osed street will r ' some of the through traffic trips i hich are 'currently using Bull Mountain Road, Graarde, 121st, arid Walnut. While no quantifi.{4d r> estimates are available to indicate the degree of relief which will. be provided existing neighborhood streets, "sharing the load" of projected through traffic certainly has a direct, b6nef.it to the entire neighborhood street system. - ,1: The joint committee's recommendatior. is toy, rovi�sie for con i ;tion `' of this street in' con j unct `� th de 'elonment bf theracant lid along its route. While some •txblir!, monies will_undoubteciI3z ; requ�� z.r 3 to eventually tie together e segments which can;be " ac3..red in tits as i:on a�ori-ty of the cost cap be born 1 q by private development. f' 5. The selected route would possibly require the removal of one older '' i K at because `th as5 home: The oi;nt committee ,:las also recommended that , street will be constructed in piece8', as: each vacant parcel along r1. not form a` straight routetetacross { .ts route is developed, it shoulda' this rolling terrain but r�•thei. should be designed wi ch gam_ le curves and. grades which will mate it more closely to .:: �` . topogrph.y, STAFF REOO11MMl7E11J4T XON • Staff recommends that the NPO #3 plan be amended to include the 135th Strec.:t ex''ensior., as proposed by NPO #3. , • I, m .. L 4 i o i • , � � r I' 1 i' r k COUNCIL, POLICY STATEMENT G ON 135TH EXTENSION As a result of reviewing tte future street requirements of the de- vetop" y slope of Bullg Cityarid Mountain, the Ti ' Council irfg nor�herl finds the niost appropriate street pattern to involve extexsxons of ii y the existing street system. These e tens::rcns would, be as follows: 135th south; to Buhl Mountain Road 121st south to Bull Mountain Rodd t Gaarde west to 135th r Vii:, 1y q r. / a i 1).-'''''',.-----'-------- rat w+. �j 1. M :+-' 0*. ".),1� :>✓ " ; " 1 � zj.•.4 J�� u •a.r11,1,('IM FiJ,,. �f�".�.,.....«+ �.. \, II ,,�vlr� uIl ." .NII C QTS, , ,A � ;Cb rOYreN.'. p!! ;�ynazaHlra) ✓,..,i n 7 ..,.,,., " q. . r 3 DAKOTA , \ CV. a (� E,/ .y �JRLHEhp, , I. g-I( ,3 \ �M'. 5UYNER N R. _,t� n m11 �. o-� I I � � ,�� T �� 1�i u. # 1 w ��, ,! ; ,,,,.,S7 DR'u'F - D N S,N', t rIGANb � 441\ 5C 7 1 S.W. c Lewis it a Z. jj 4 LN. 3 v w7 I - �I r c` N s 3 i+ ! Sw_ 'A KATHbRIh�R�t° _-+ n, .33 I.y '--i.: r15 tFIW I r .1 t �a 34 S,W, r ��,,„." ,, t ,,11«i"",,.,, I! ~`�� : �1 - 1 i Io,L..;,,, t T25.RIW � 1 s -}" rHERINL 5y yy»+ 3 m t, m ,, G H E k - .4%Tml rt ST �,3,� ` y�r 7M ��_s-..K„r....._.3 _,,,....„,,•'' � = "' `"- ,r.'�....-1� '3L,;1/4..,,2,4 taND CT, ,�w `'C' ILLS PL iww_G�,,,:A.), W .1;.',,,1' . u S.w.(AR4 �� SW.ANN ST. WAt•TIUT -. o. -.+.. ,/a ,. ST r t t N to...K F1 G ''-' !lr N>. I " '". 'i yu'� �6 > +n�~ K>T14�a �pVE �� _..»,_...J 3 s1r rp "' 4� , ,W c �'°rw x 4wJ,1 ry = - 5`� SW —b,,,— �'� � `� �� f", a r S,W ,,X`i_ a 9.'-'j -. ,r•.' C",,,. LQ" . �,.. F "F Mrd✓•q.�trj"� h. ,�Yp4�t e.'t fr �• <'T a� " '''''''.........141.-- ...4;,,, W J it I.N ,r'''' CTS - ....' a{. / 3,j„ - '1dC,1. q 5T. T y'+t.- �M � ST.� � S.W. � ✓ ,, > FOHNtR lrt i 9 yi r kIS ,l'"r sw. AL8RrA sY�/ . FONNER a r s w ‘4.- '!...,4.31 i> .. � " l i w =')i .,,,,T1/1 'mW. 1AedE5.:..RD ST DECYY DELI - z y Ot ""v- tit e y �.' CT. -1 .....";p4.7.1,,..,,, 41 f ,, r $I rM S.W .1ARIbN .SY, .:,,-,s 4,✓ 5w, PAR,r. tI QST. :. �.• o M .n. L� 111 / f , J II /1 n. ..4.t. 4� � d t --,'''''11. I 41°°:„'x OOK �! 4` t1 N ,ik r ��I s 1 7 e�. - 4.1 1 a. •,*-• �¢ 4 . e .n ti � 5W �kA1kHAV a.A I.I 5Y Qr. u. ��,f• ." h— �` !O ,fie, i i E‘ 5Y1 .Fit `9'' * CT c4,R1uWEN ,«►. - t� Ef" W_ y� *-z---- . yw<✓Y ` I k �VIE�Mc ern R�+;r N`zLYtE11 ST. tf l� ,„4,,,- r' `l SW y, t*t 4, , o- N9.0 ;' > f 1#Y.Lw'EW G' 3 r d 1 �"; L.J +JW �"eu�rtr CiAARbE�: � SQA. wt l ado ,r � �e41 AL6.' 4:.,„a 1 t. r ( I �. �.. M ''''''',1-, S� E'N TC RACJ: ST. i ,w, ,wAN„Ct` ., W'INEZ . , of n � � a� .. � 1 '• >4 - MOUNTAIN �o Q ��'' BULL. ..:.- ... R� !W o LM 4 PEMnetDOk ui yUhDDf� 3TR' T W + Y L._ DG,4i � +tn 5.WHw.'' Gt « EMERPJO ,r p vi pA' ` I It' W ' ,n � r 1 g L o' rpt ,. IJ �! C,„/"-- w*y'Fp`. ISP II MI 4'w SvW .. $IW 7RIY' `µ. �, * � » adds. ,F y i r. , ti +ld00, c . , Q- ;...il, YY�.u.4iN11Y+'iW�nWaii it ygty .)>,,,,,ci2tu.. * 4)'.!' rri fin' � i I i.t.,....,,.,,,,,,, t:,.....,..,,„,*,„..,"',„--... 1 4 ,-, 4.. y p ,a J:r G 1 � I wN L,� Y.!' � ��w"++l^� �w J '�LL1,� � '�' Il-k +,o.w..ui wr,�w + 1 xy yl 1 `l w n, .irk Nr ilfti p1 w•° S* i. . ,,,,,,,41 i 1. *'''',1.24" 3*' 1. .,N�".L. , osAN i ' r 1I F + d wtr