Loading...
CPA1994-00004POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. CPA 94- 0004 /ZON 94-0006 Nimbus Center Nimbus Center Assoc. all NW 19th, #102 Portland, ; OR 97209 503 -227-0423 OWNER: Sate QUEST: fiBieen d t he Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning District Map Amend the Industrial and Planned Industrial to a General Commercial Comprehensive Plan map and zoning designation. 10115 SW Nimbus Avenue (WCTM 1S1 34AA, tax lot 1500) . The site is located at the southwest corner of SW Scholls Ferry Road ane'a SW Nimbus Avenue. 1 REVIEW CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Chapters Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 12 and 13. ZONE: an current zone Industrial Park permits a range of light industrial uses industrial park. Light Industrial also permits up to 20s of a development complex to be used fora range of commercial uses. General Co miter ` . Ca.al zone provides ovides sites for the provision of major goods and servides . CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: +'oel; Stevons CHECK ALL WHICH APPL `F' ,STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION. DATE OF HEARING : TEA _ TIME:, NrA.RINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARfl G : '" y ,.. : TIME CITY COONCIL DATE OF HEARING: SBA TIME :, THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTa,,AU AVAILABL E k �lR V:C' Ei 'TNG IN THE PLANNING DIVISION; .Ji_ VICINITY MAP ....,. LANDscABING PLAU NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN OTHER: ]P X AMBHDANTInle HANGE CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639 -4171 0 614ggo 1. AL INFORNA IOI PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 1.0115 S.W. Nimbus Avenue Tigard, Oregon TAX AND TAX LOT NO. 131 34 AA - 01900 SITE SIZE 105,851 Sq. Ft • —. PROPERTY OWE /DEED SOLDER. *Nimbus Center Associates ADDRESS 811 N.W. 12th, Suite 1Q2 PERM227 -0423 CITY Portland, OR ZIP 97209 APPLICANT* Sue_ --- ADDRESS PHONE:.,.,_..�...., CITY ZIP L ..... -p--4- *When the owner and the applicant are different on with written authorizaton :� tsi purchaser „L � people, the applicant in oases lic�nt mint be the h of record from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorisation. owner(s) must sign this n in the The provided on page two or application space a written authorization with this application. 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (if I- L _ .�...�!.;., applicable) from to and a Zone C-G OR The applicant requests an amendment to the llowi sections of 'the ' p f o �' � Com rehenei e Plan or CossaunitY Development Code APPLICATION A CEPT r BY: ,4 4!<' DATE: Application elements submitted Application form (1) V (B) Owner' ►3 signature /written authorization (0) Applicant' s statement (pre -app check list) .1!"::(D) Filing fee (t -I: Y'.+7llmaL Additional inforiati give lsn Hap Amendments/Zone (E) !flaps indicating property location (pre -app the ...; Iii,./.,„(17) )List of F operty owners and dresses within 250 feet (1) (G) Assessor's 'Nap (1) n. (H) Title transfer instrument (1) Halbert _.n 611,, . B. If the application is granted,' the applicant will exercise .° th4t4',Icights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all tit:a conditions aud limitations of the approval. , , . IS All of the above statements and the stateitiaL‘to in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted ° herewith,, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that aoy permit ,issued, based on thiD application:, may be revoked if it is fond that any such ,stittements are ID The prslicant has read the entire coritep,;t0 of the application, inclUdini3 , the policies and criteria, and ond,(arstandEA the requireutellts for approving or denying the application. e4TTOR N 8Y'S SAT "t:�►i ONE MAIN Pt.AC:C �1 101 S, W MAIN 'sTRE:E~Ti oulTi, /,lath; PoRTL ANto,'OREcsio a itatPat I'ZL„EPHONE (603) 026-88 la `rtl-kCOP? (329t ck -1 1101 PliON91(19At lo, ANc v N 'i .SsUME 10g WASH UIGTON"i 0. 2)004 •rE tPI- 6NE (202( 633 -3307 iLi:00PY l60ili7p341047 a . Roberts: Cit Of Tigard P 0nning Division 13 25 SW Hail Blvd. i ar .$ Or -gon 97223 p� �,�ry ♦ 's us 'Liws. Must , Am"'A gs y�q ve pia .. ,.. ., ,,wry �y ,. � .• en dm_ .. .� m .tl:.' " '^ •1 ^ �, V e �i is w .« M _ �,..� , .r~.+.: C t a endm _n1 Fa1�Cy� Mr, 'Roberts: Enclosed is a new check :n the 0amount , cf , 52.00 to coVer the zone change application fee that we discussed on the telephone today. Please mark* check i 5689, in the amount o $520,00 , ',Void" and return it to ` me in the enclosed en 'e ope. Thank you very i►hch; for your as) %stance in his tte�� . if you have L'A estions or require addition', ki in or €1atlon, p1eas feel free to contact Me. Very truly yOUXS, docinimi aahigardj29 Riacto tes cc: MrW lack 'L bollard Ur, R3cturd H Mixt • . o° Map and Zone Chutge fot parcel the z9,,, 601:ila-c! re Com Hfee 4' ' not PrC4r4!) were -;, neater , of, 1413 1q46 ' . biFs.a"' 6hange idred incomplete • tee the - 9[11 est. ' • 13i61;"eart.0414.1. p,:dHrttefn' whic aP fee, hang- herisilre 1.113.21g.- The zonie.c ittpre for a the et) fee contact feel 'w free to as filed „ ;.., , Mark Roberts AISElistant Planner BA,LL., JAN! I pv.050p.toc. ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE MAIN FLAG& 1 101 S,W, MAW 5TREET, SUITE "kip PORTLAND, OREGON 07204-3274 TELEPI40NE (503) 228 -2528 TELECOPY (50:x) 295- 10513' TRANSERVE DELIVERY City of Tigard Attn: ltr. Mark Roberts piamning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. T igard , Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Roberts Please Enclosed p find the following items 1. City of Tigard, Oregon Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone Change /Zone Ordinance Amendment Application, 2. Application fees in the amount of $1,195.00; 3. Copies of the Affidavit of Mailing and the Affidavit of Posting for the neighborhood meeting held on June 17 1994 (Originals sent to your attention on June 6, 1994; 4, Copy of th4 list of interested parties who attanded the meeting held on June 17, 1994. .:� If you have questions or require additional infori at on, please feel free to contac t one. truly Yours r Debora E. Collard Legal Assistant detinembushigard.j22 Efcto+rcs cc: MI. Susan Alillcr Mt. lack L ordt*t 1 M . Rlcharci H. Allan ud .h -y4�y :i �:t�• sPID AV TUG aunty of kultnama n . DgB0 E. COLLARD in first du l sworn, c o O• saY that on june ' i 1994" I e c cause �o n e mailed to � each 0f. ne persons on the attached list a notice of a .,meeting to discus rO OpOs4d Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone • C ange �'� a ' co ,which no ice ° so mailed is attached, hereto it de a Pa Z further State that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to sal d persons and w + deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post. Office a Portland, Oregon, with postage prepaid thereon. SU CRISED AND SWORN TO before Me this 6th, day of June,' OFFICIAL SEAL CARL ENE R. SHERER NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON COMMISSION NOA128582 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG. 09, i997 Nat .ry Public for Grego. Mlr Commission E itrest . :. A 'L L. N 0 K a VA e►T'i'C`?4lR8'!`` s div t. t4 Qt+164 P440N Pt,ACGrt 10,1 $. W. ; AgiN sTRecr ousT'8* !t p .reLeP'H Nf;'i∎'?1O3 22s -a825 TE*.'it coP i6o3S 296-40 .56 tosar ;ore,OQ I, lint �tLf1N Y6�'apfiap AVM. a6: �adhintiton Mu ua� . +1, Second. AvenUe eattls+, Washington '98111 Interested ' Party: Our firm represents Nimbus Cer ter AsSG:.at .es, the cs of the ��'•�p�rt ' located at 10115 s Bib 8,ti +l4mbus . Avonild p Tigard, "egon a we are considering endment and �► Zone g � ertY from Industrial Park ������ to �����aa�on�rcial DiStr ct fleyor lG malci.ng aPPlication to the cittY of Tigard for the necessary quid like to discuss the proposal with the surrounding prop otiners and residents, )You are invited + o attend g' June 171 1g94 city of Tigard Water + Department Auditorium 87.7'., 5 'Burnham Street Tifgard, Oregon 7 :30 Pollio Please note this wili be an information, meeting on plans may altered �..� �s �ry fop �� � Plans. These �iilAtigi7 �Sd: be a�lt� •.9� �M � �1b � to ..abmitta1 of the application to the Cit. . If you u a. e. bona Please call one a the above tele hone � ` r. 1Washiill ton rat attal 19 : � cond Avenue e '�1e, Washington 98111. Ca. Development Corporation Property Tax Department 201'.$ission Street San Francisco, CA 94105 uaiatin tills Park and Recreation District 15707 SWW1er'Road Besv'erton, OR 97005 ' Robinson Crossing Enterer ses, c /o .Terry Wilson 1000 SW Broadway, suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97205 ' West one Bank Oregon c/o Acct Operations 3- 2105. PO Box 8247 Soi'ee, Idaho 83733 Oregon Retired Persons Pharmacy, Inc PC Box 2755 Portland, OR 97208 Th+0mas E Harrington 105 Fremont Avenue Suite . B Los Altos, CA 94022 Phillip Xuan HO 11330 SW Irontiood Loop Tigard, OR 97223 Jesse C. & Y rglnia C. Tittle 11332 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard, OR 97223 Linda M. Freeman 11334 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard, Oregon 97223' Pa con Townsend 11336 SW Ironwood! Loop Tigard, OR 97223 City of Tigard 13 125 SW Hall , Blvd. PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 David L. & Laura J. Jenkins 11338 SW Iron Wood Loop Tigard, OR 97223 William R. & Betty Bennett 11340 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard, Oregon 97223 Cordell A. & Molly L. Tietz 11342 SW Ironwood Loon Tigard, OR 97223 William W. & Nancy L. Brewer 11344 SW Ironwood, Look Tigard, OR 97223 Cheater Robinson Trust William R. & Constance A. Robinson c/o Forum Properties 8705 SW Nimbus, Suite 230 Beaverton, OR 97005 Melvin James Hansen, Jr. 11348 SW I;conwood Loop Tigard, OR 97223 CZT a ers . Mary Swintek 9915 SW Frew' ng, #23 Tigard, OR 97223 Craig Hopkins 7430 SW V'arns Tigard, OR 97223 Mark F. Mahon 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard, OR 97223 Joel Stevens 9660 SW Ventura Cottrt Tigard, OR 97223 TAT OF OfEGON jaunty of Multnomah ) T, . DE ORA E. (1\1' i1D, do affirm that S am representative of the party initiating interest a ropose Cortpr tens . e P] *,n Amendment and Zone Change a' feet ng the al►�3 located at 10115 SW .�4iibus Avoenu.e, and did on the. ' 3rd day o June, 1994 ' :ersonally post notice indicating that the site may bs proposed for a C mprehens i +fie play Amendment' ant. ' Zeno* Cha ge an the tuner date and place of =' neighborhood neetin '�.o discuss the ccam�., p�/w oposa o Tie sign was `posted parallel tc .Nimbus Avenue, southeast of the parking lot entrance that is Closest to Sc ol1 s Ferry Road. SUBSCRIBED AND SNOPN TO before me this 6th day of June, OFFiciAt. SEAL tilAtILEN fl. SHEf ER NOTARY PUBUC - OREGON ,i CCM lMlSSlON N0.02 552 13MISSI0N, EXPIRES AUG. 61, itV Notary` Public for Oregon NY Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT OF MAI* IOG STATE OF OREGON County of i'llashington City of Tigard being first duly sworn /affirm, deposes and say: (Please print) That I ai' a wei " 56e)reilvut for The City of T &rd, Oregon. V,at I served NOTICE OF ''uBL]:C HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF'D}CISION FOR: on oath City Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission ___.-Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named attached list marked exhibit "B" on the said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as here c b l in the Un� the day of ed States Mail on the postage p»epaid Decision) of which is attached (Marked persons at th a dre s shown on e day of 19'� Cached, was po ted on an appropriate , 19�.,.,._ and deposited •, 19 ePt Su ibed and sworn /affirmed before MO on the ; day of 19 OFCIAL SEAL, ocittaAt JeLosnics; ¢Cry, riusil OR'& ' r �` a NO, 003977 My OOM tssSx+oS:. EXP .' 't`: .1 5 J N 0 T I C E O F P U B L I H E A R I N G , „Joc NOTICE IS --' GIVEN " ' • 3 0 PM, IN THIE TOWN HALL OF ITS MEETING ON TUESDAY, geEte�Beoex2 P.!'r�730 TIGARD , CITY COUNCIL, OF THE TIGARD CIVIC IT3�' CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE TITLE: Nimbus Center APPLICANT: Nimbus Center Associates 811 NW 19th, #102 Portland, OR 97209 503- 227 -0423 OWNER: Same REQUES11 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 94- 0004 /ZONE CHANGE ZON 94 -0006 NIMBUS, Amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from Llgrt Industrial (I- L) and Zoning District Map from Industrial Park (I -P) to a General Commercial Comprehensive Plan Map and zoning designation ttC -G). 10115 SW Nimbus Avenue (WCTM 151 34AA, tax lot 1900)`. The site is the ` southwest corner of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue, REVIEW CRITERIA Compreh nsive plan Policies 1, 2, 5, 8 and 12. LOCATION it located at APPLICABLE Community ZONE: The current zone Industrial Park permits a range of light industrial uses within an industrial park. Light Industrial also permits up to 20% of a Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32, and 18.62. development complex to be used for a range of commercial uses. The General Commercial zone provides sites for the provision of mayor goods and services. HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF T COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF THE PUBLIC THE COMMUN PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IV, CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVEI5T LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS TIITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED StON LANGUAGE INT'ERPRETE�TAND 5Q6UALIOFI��� ORL�N�UZ '7�N��DDRETTELECOOP�IJNICUEST PLEASE CALL 635-4171, TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS, ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLI HEARING, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECEIVE A WRITING P STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM `THE LCITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND C HEARING. AT INVITE' BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE CITY COUNCIL MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARIN M E'i�. ORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC: HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS G TO ANOTHER � LNG TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL NF r N' EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER September 7, 1994# ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT T SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEi.ARING. REMAIN OPEN FOR. AT LEA.. � 1a THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD INCLUDED IN THIS NOTI CE IS A LIST Or APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE, REQUEST ° FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND' THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. BY THE CITY COUNCIL SWIL " ;, BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE, OR FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE WITH SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY SO AS TO PROVIDE THE CITY, APPLICANT. OR OTHER PARTIES TO THE APPLICATION WITH A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND, WILL PRECLUDE APPEAL ON SAID ISSUE TO THE STATE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS (LUBA). ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES, CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORDER OR STAFF PLANNER Mark Roberts AT 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON.' 4�1 P .trilullerai ae .� ®►e Its lIC, " .1,t 0 etamiiiner w�w ' 'its'''Ar -r" -leer ° e e sul fRReleU ►t e� ewo = �.-t z. a e / 11111 p'1 d e�":: n. - makZri e A r f r °� .. t, id iii mull 1 ' r R BIN cZ , CiESIER MUST & ROBIlVado WILLIAM R & C NSTPNCE A By E PROPERTIES 8705 SW MMUS #230 MAMMON, at 97005 FREEMAN/ LINDA " M 11334 SW mat= t LOOP :exam Oq, 9 STATE 01' ' OREGON County. of Washington City' of Tigard PO being first dully sworn/a firm, on That I am 'rho . City of get d, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR °t That I served NONCE OF DECISION FOR: City o;? Tigard Planning D irectar Ti`rar�t;'anning Commission. Tigard - hearings Officer Tigitrd City Council. copy ;`Public Hearing Notice /Notice of. Decision) of which . !s attar: ed (Marked Exhibit "A" ) was mailed to each named rs ns a 4�1 a " Pe .. t , the ,a►� _ ®s shown ion the attached list marked exhibit B on the said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as here , attachecly of post on an appropriate bulletin board on the dial, of , 9 , ,.»; and deposi d in the Unit: Mail on the .� day of ';! .. , 19 Postage re paid. ate United St Sub ribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the . rte,, OFFICtAL;SEAL DIANE : JELDEl ICs NOTARYPUBLICOREGON � ►4 .. COMMIWON NO.008977 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 7. ICI NOTICE O F P U B L I C H E A R I N G NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, Aagu.pt, 22, 1994, AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOM HALL OF THE TIGARD CI1 C CENTER, CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION 13125 SW HHALL 'IILVD. , TIGARD,_ OREGON, WILL r FILE NO CPA 94- 0004 /ZON 94 -0006 FILE TITLE: Nimbus Center Associates APPLICANT: Nimbus Center Associates OWNER Sams 811, NW 19th, #102 Portland, OR 97209 503- 227 -0423 REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from Light Industrial (I -L) and Zoning District Map from Industria]. ?park (I -P) to a General Commercial Comprehensive Plan Map and zoning designation (C -G). LOCATION: 10115 SW Nimbus Avenue (WCTM 1S1 34AA, tax lot 1900) « 'Tie site is located at the southwest corner of SW Stholls Ferry Road and SW '_Nimbus' Avenue. APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Chapters 1, 2, 5, 11 and 12. Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 12 and 13. within an industrial n .+ permits g permits industrial uses. ZONE The c :park. Light Industrial also range light up to 20% of a development complex to be used for a range of commercial uses. The General. Commercial zone provides sites for the provision of major goods and services. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, ORES OF PROCEDURE PROLE PROCEDURE SET DEVELOPMENT .CODE AND RUL OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE CON�G�'ILi1�ITY DEVE S OF PROCEDURE 5ET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. RULE ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE �' R TO ARRANGE ) ?OR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND CITY WILL ALSO END�JAVO rtx ., , DEAF) 4171, EXT. 356 TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES THAN QUALIFIED BILINGUAL ICES FOR THE Q(UOICE) OR 684-2772 UPON REQUEST., PLEASE CALL 63 9 (TDD - TILECOM�+IUN INTERPRETERS Us�O WEEK F) �:JO LESS T ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. , AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMI RECEIVE _. .t . ISSION WILL RECir A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE «I TREPANNING COMMISSION TE PUBLIC HEARING; ANN? INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TEST MAY CONTINUE THE ACTION APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS E NCE PU BL " NG TO NOTH R METING TO STAIN ADDITIONAL INE'ORMATION: OR: CLOSE. EVIDENCE IC HEARING TO ANOTHER IN SUPPORT 1 I� HEARING THE, APPLICATION AFTER., A� 2; 1994,' ANY PARTY IS EN'T'ITLED "1'i3 REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED; AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE MEARING INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OP APPROVAL ; CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TiE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE COI ISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THESE. CRITERIA; AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOIt TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE ; DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD 'OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR IN PECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER i ?AGE . AT LEAST SEVEN' DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN C I,NTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE. STAFF PLANNER OREGON. Roberts AT - 47.1 TIGARD CITY HALL, x,3125 SW HALL BLVD., T 639 o .0 P 0; wrens ®r �4 ®.: twsp.ul® rr 1111► rr.�.4 ; Rrpp1111L0.1 Ae iy�rm eml �w44 �r Lei si r : b,, mar 111114 _i ! ''. ■®IIPAos.►Ra5Aii ROBINSON, CHESTER TRUST & ROBINSON, WILLIAM R & COtISTANCE A BY FORUM PROPERTIES 8705 SW NIMBUS #230 13EAVERTCtl, OR 97005 PRIV:d4AN, LINDA M 11334 SW IRttliritX)D LOOP TEGARD, OR 97223 W 11ING",L N riuTuAr, 11.91, SECID' . AVE SEATTLE,. WA 98111 B INET , WILLIAM R BETTY 11340 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD, OR 97223 ROBINSON, CONSTANCE A & WILLIAM 811 NW 19TH #102 PORTLAND, OR 97209 BARRING'LON, THOMAS ' E 105 FREMONT AVE , U TE B LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 Z , FEN'I N & ESTH R li 11336 SW 10NWC 0D LOOP TIGARD/ OR 97223 W 5' OI E BANK OREGON BY ACCT OPERATIONS 3Q -2105 PO BOX 8247 BOISE, '`ID 83733 JEW= DAVID & LAURA J 11338 SW IRON6'I00D LOOP TIGARD, OR 97223 TIETZ, ' CORDELL A/MOLLY L �.., 11342 SW IRONWOOD LOOP tors TIGARD, OR 97223 ROBINSON/ CHESTER TRUST Ei ROBINSON, Ln LLTAN! R & CONS A By FORUM PROPERTIES 8705 SW NIMBUS. _ #230 BEAVERTON OR 97005 EIMAN, LINDA NdAM 11334 $W IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD, OR 97223 azt4Bus CE`R ASP�i, :2CIATEB 811 I h$ 19m, #102 P J2TL / OR 97209 JOEL S 9660 SW P+ GT TIGARD, OR 97223 .s� DA' N asala.1 x`..1994.. Tigard Planning, Department RE• Icd Comprehensive Plan Map - and' nd Zoning District- Map `from Light ndustrial and Planned' Industrial a General Cct erciallComgreheneiVe y4 plan. Map •and *toning, desig ate cnn. t Plan and a plic Frei • 1# Cached xa tiae .Site � P ant a s�tiate.�eant for`.; �►aur rev ew. . information vaila by .. f a. r . � ort °.and. recot me ndation , will be -prepared a.,;ailable ' ; . ,_ L ' and; from; othQr various de art. entss end agencies an v ;decision will be. re tired to o�xr etaf, , F d'; �, rendered on the ;gro�oeal .'i.n the ,;a�ear,� future ; to comment on this application, we ,noted your comments by` fir s .i:9 ,+ You may . use , tk a apace provided below or attach a separate letter to• `rc:.urn your commentii.. nd by Claw av° please phone the staff , :oxtact noted lel•ewr With haavecan entestionst�regar„ing thi m tter, ©ntact the Tigard. .poSaible . If you any Planning Department; 13125 SW Hall. Blvd. ; "±igard; OH� 9.1223'.. PHONE: 639. 4171..; STAPP CONTACT: .. ___.. . :._ T THAT P: CHI .. Tam FaLFOLLOWING l. +� LY' We hsve rwiewed the proposal and. have ' no objections to Please contact ;.,�.. �:, of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting Phone Number • a 1'- 'NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL :APPLTC.ATIONS CIT (2) copies . CITY DEPARTMENTS Building Official /Dave's. ity Recorder gineering /Michael A. Permits Facilitator /Jerree G. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Fire District (pick -up box) Tigard: Water Department, 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Water District 6501 ` SW Taylors 'Ferry Rai. Tigard, OR 97223 AFFECTED 'JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use a Transp. 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis ----Kevin Martin ----Mike Borreson Scott Xing Fred Eberle City Ff of Beaver on ""`Jim Hendryx Principal Planner'. PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 City of King City City Manager 15300 Sw 116th King City, OR 97224 City of Lime,, Oswego City Manager' 380 SW A Lake Oswego, OR 97034 State Highway Division Bob Doran PO ;:ox 25412 Portland, OR 97225 -04/2 AGENCIES General Te .Zephone Engineering ii`5ice PO Box 23416 Tigard, OR 97281 -3416 NW Nattiral Gas Scott Palmer 220 NW Second Ave. Portland, OR 97209 TCI- Cablevision of Oregon Linda Peterson 3500 SW Bond St. Portland, OR 97201 Coliun'bia Cable (Frank Stone) "--- 14200 SW Brigadooit Ct. Beaverton. OR 97005 STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics Dig. (ODOT) bivision 011 State Lands 7777. tommerC8 Dept.: - M. 3. Park Fish B Wildlife PDC` Dept. of i nviron. 01hlit:V. FEDERAL AGENCES Corps. of Dngineers Post Office OTHER Southern Pacific anspo tatiotcompany Deane, M'.. Forney, Ls - ptojeat Engineer' 800 NW 6th Aventie,; R..32V,, tiniOn. St ►tion, Portland, OR 0'1209 CPO NO. view ',Ai-Ave Parks & Recreation Board, Police Field Operations L 4ong Range Planning /Carol'` tJni f ie, Sewe rage Agency /: 'M Program 155 N. ieirst , St. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Boundary Commission 800 NE Oregon St. 416 Suit,a 540 i Cortland. OR. 97232 -2109, METRO - GREENSPACES PROGRAM Huie (CPA's /ZOA'n) 600 NE Grand Portland, OR 97232 -2736 V' % DLCb (CPA's /ZOA's)' --" 1175 Court St. NE Salem,' OR 97310 -0590 Other City of Durham �—" City Manager PO Box ''3483 -3483 Tigard, OR 97224 Cicy of Portland "—"- Planning Director 1120 SW 5th Portland, OR 97204 Y o00T Lic :ien Rahmann 9002 SE McLoughlin Blvd. Milwaukie, OR 97222 City of Tualatin "" PO Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 Portland General Elec. ----Brian Moore 14655 SW Old Sc2olls Fry. Beaverton, OR 97007 Metro Area witt Comnmiinications — Jason Ne Twin Oaks Technology Center 1815 NW 169th Place S -6020 Beaverton, OR 97006-4886 US West, Pete Nelson 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 37204 Tri -Met Transit bey. Kim KnoX 710 NE Holladay St. Portland, OR 97232 DOGAMX OTHER. a '?11-0 hts for n ust b¢ zAio iced tip. Dili) 97 '.'6X5' and ()Art GTapter, 661 ee reverse side for su#'imitti irYrs�ig + Sys: regtiir„: 6 Jurisdi tiers Date of Adoption Date the Proposed Notice was mailed t ±a DLCD won prehensive -Plan Te) t Arriendrthen and Use Regti:otion P� nendrrient vew: Land Use : teguIatio n a re1 optno ocal File # =ULM& _..:. _ Pate failed , ,salt , 1 JOE ' C�► ?prel ensive Plan lapA+ lei'► In Zoning Map Amendment Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical teams. Do not write "See. Attached MatAgantotQamatuthiLrdamaaa Light r !ndustna a Plaaled Industrial. res ive�y; to den ��1 Commercial do bot this • �. Iii Dl trjc r t ^ e •t,l•. '1 wittLammaymj, Describe how the adopted amendment differs from the proposed amendment. write "Same." If you did not give notice of the proposed amendment,' write ` - ACA Same.: it is the sania, Plan Map Change From 11.0131industriel Zone Map Change From ono In�,rial .4 .eti Con mereiai to � ....G.B.Egrairesatilortio Location 101J 5 '1N N mbu �.w Aeres involved: 243 i • �i Density Yr Specify Density: Previous Density N/ A hle�l NSA.., .. :- .... a�ns Applicable Goals: , 1 andi as an Exception adopted DLCD ,fie # , 404 id11.6r� r�hr +�lr'%wl.rir�nirvsiw.n.Yriir i LCD Aptae�►t fle i si D$1 n tl! � y ; t P' o posed t endment 5 days pnor p the anal hearinx P fDid DI.CCi rPC�wt� a once u �' , es. No: _„�_�_• the Statewide Planning Goals do n, 't ply Ernerger'ey Ciroumslances Requir 'd l3xpeditedaRevie.d A iectcri State or Federal °Agencde ,, Local. Go vernments or Specie Districts .1 nmet Q anrea�. eon: .■ Local Contact: Pho ne: (503) 639 - 417'x;.. Address: $ W Hall r 972 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ORS. 197,615 and OAR Chapter 660, Division 18 . Send this Form and Two (2) Copies of the Adopted Amendriaent to: Department of Land Conservation and Development 1175 Court Street, N.L. Salem, Oregon 97310 -0590 S• ubmit l l0 if copies are bound, please submit two (2)` p �, ®O adopted xnate�.aa copies of a comte copias of documents and maps. • Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later live (5) wd • orking days � than following the date of ent, f the final decision on the amendm Adoption 1'n ✓ Submittal of Notice of u8 • .... t include the text of the amendment pl .d ��hrs adopted findings and supplementary n: deadline to appeal will be extended you do his Notice • The dea pp will d � �'.. o not this � of Adoption p .. Appeals to LtrBA ma.. be ile'd. withiia. within five (5) working days of the final decision pp Y ( 21 to DLCD, Adoption days of the date Notice of �►d© tron �s sent t • In addition to sen ding Notice of Adoption to DLO), you, must notify persons who participated in the lazal bearing a n d request( notice of the final decision If you need more copies of this form, please call the DLCD at 503,373 -0050 or t be duplicated on green paper. form ma rin #.your, name, address, iand21 CRV,OY nG ` City 0f T!gar, Planning Division 13125 SW Hell Floulevar c Tigard,. Oregon 97223 CPA 91 -01; CPA 92 -07; ZOA 92 -04 ;' 20A 93~01; CPA 93-09; ZOA 93 -07; CPA 94-02X .el CPA 96 -01; CPA 96 -04; ZON 96-06; CPA 941-01; ZOA 97 -03; ZOA 97 -05 !� r, omplete items 1 anrllor 2 t tlr oddi tonal services. ao • Complete Items 3, 4e, and 4b. 0.4 ■ Print your name and address► .r the reverse of this form so that we can return this cad io you. t Y Attach this roan to tl�re front of the mailpiece or on the back it spa.^o does not ✓ ponnit ■ Write 'Rotilm Receipt Rerieested" on the mdilpipbe below the elide number. the .. • rtoiirrR edm �tecelpA Will sho4+1 to wham the arE4cb Was detivesed and .rte da t also wlsh'to receive TtnO, foliorag service's (for an e dra fee): 1.0 Adclrossee's Address Restricted Delivery Consult postlmaster ror,fee. o 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Articld Number' E DEPT OF LAND CONSERVATION & DEV 8 1175 COURT ' STREET NE y SALEM OR 97311Q -0590 rrc X77 ' 472 m 5. Ie+relved 5y: (Print Nerve) O. Sight rat (Add tte drAgent) A - t',.; Face 3811. Decsmbeir'1 4b. Se%tt.e Type Fieistered. C]! Ceriified 0 xpres Malt '0 insured ' Return Re t for M€ rchamlise T CCya, .:.... -, 7, Date of Vetiver 8. Addressee's Addiest (GOY ff regciested andleeIspa STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard 4 �A. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Please Print 4 hereby certify: That l am a ,, steatta That I served notice of the Ti and City Council 9 � for the City of Tigard, Oregon. of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the day of Oe. , 19 itt , by mailing to each of them at the address shown on the att., d. ed list (Marked Exhibit B), said no`:toe is hereto States Mail on the _fl day attache, and deposited in the United 5t Y of 19 erf postage prepaid. Prepared Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of •66f L L. OFFICIAL SEAL CATHE2INc WHEATLEY Nft. NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON • � COMMISSION NO 006u30 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 10, 1995 h: \login \cattiM ffl tiI Notary Public of Oregon My Comrnission Expires; 1 of CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTXCR or FINAL ORD R BY CITY COUNCIL Concerning Case Number(s) CPA 94- 0004 /Z6N 94-0006 Name of Owner: Nimbus .Center Associates Name of Applicant: Same A.d' eis 811 NW 19th *102 City :Pond_„ State OR Zip 972 2090 . Address ` of Property: 10115 'SW. Nimbus Avenue Tax Map and Lot No(s) .: 1S1 `;34AA tax .lot 1900 Request: • T'he site is located at the southwest corner ofHSW Scholl: Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue. Amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from Light Industrial (I -L) and Zoning District Map from Industrial Park (1 -P) to a General ComneLcial Comprehensive Plan Map and zoning designation (C -G) APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Chapters 1, 2, 5, 11 and 12. Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 12 and 13. Zone: The current zone Industrial Park permits a range of light industrial use within an industrial park. Light industrial also permits up to 20% of a development complex to be used for a range of commercial uses. The C-G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insu ante, and .real estate services, business support services, and eating and drinking ''- lim *,ments among ogler uses. • Ac t ion Approval as requested Wig roval with conditions .�.°' genial. • Notice; Notice was published iA the newspaper, posted at City, Ha and mailed to: • X The applicant and owner(s) IC . Owners of record within the, required distance, Affected governmental agencies Final ON DECIS THE Decision: • 'AS Y1N"r.I9 ON �. .. ' , AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON fl) Co The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions car be obtained from the Planning Department, 'Tigard Ci t Hall, 13125 ftW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. A review S pgened FLU. : ,tics of inters. s.ew of this decision hay be obtained bV filingcordng t© their. with the Oregon Land TJse Board of , A OA)" a+ Procedures. 9UgsTIONS a If yott have an questions, please ca1.1 , the l'igard Recorder' at 639-4171. WHEREAS„ the applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan 'ertd Ione Change Amendments from Light Industrial to General Commercial, for a 2.43 acre parcel 18134AA, tax lot 1900). .WHEREAS, the Planning commission held public hearing on August 22 1994 and concurred with the Planning Division's recommendation for approval; WHEREAS, he Tigard City Council held a public hearing" on the request September 27, 1994 to review the applicants proposal, the staff report, the Planning Commission recommendation and to receive public testinlonlc. SEC110E1 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria based upon the facts, findings, and conclusions noted in the attached final order and map Identified as Exhibit A; SECTION 2: The City Council concurs with the Planning Commission and staff recommendations and approves the request to redesignate the parcels illustrated on the attached map (Exhibit A) with a Comprehensive Plan designation of General' ■"140Milleitial and C-G (General Cattirne zoning, t I IT °A►° CITY OF TIOARD CITY COUNCIL 'INAL ORDER P221AL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, WITH REGARD to Alt A.PPLZCATI FOR A , calesumagnint PLAN AIODIDEENT AND ZONE MEG* APPLICATIONS ,REQUESTED BY T i* Ni OS ASSOCIATES. The Tigard City Council reviewed the application below at a public hearing on September 27, 1994. The City Council approves the 2.equest. The Council has based its decision on the facts, findings and concionions noted below. A. FACTS 1. gitEnali Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 94 -'004 Zone Change ZON 94 -0006 of a Co REQUEST: A request for approval approval mP rehensive Plan Amendment from T-L (Light Industrial) to C -G (General Commercial) and .a Zone Change request fro m I -P (Industrial Park), to C -G (General Commercial) . APPLICANT: Nimbus Center Associates 811 NW 19th, Suite 102 rort1an::; OR 97209 OWNERS: same REPRESENTATIVE: Richard Allen Ball, Janick and N'ovack One Main Place � 97204. -3274 1100 101 SW Main Stre.et, Suite Portland, OR LOCATION: WCTM 1511 34AA, tax lot 1900)i The site is ON. 101Y5 Nimbuz Avenue � and located at the southwest corner of SW Scholia �, Q perry Road a SW Nimbuz Avenue within the ;Koll ,3ue3.nec• +sitter. The subject site is 2.43 acres in size and is locatoJd on the southwest �:holls Ferry Road and Nibus street cvririg tree ,Koll, Business corner rrf SW g Coll Business Ctdntec sw Nimbus Avenue is a local Center whir: ad west of t e 217 State Highway Fenno Creek h consists of approximately Creek Cea - W Schalk Perry Road of S r'Y' 50 acres adjoining' Fenno re borders o Areas to the north ot SW borders "she entire business Center to the weal.. Scholl Ferry � . the cit t o of Beaverton and d are developed loped Wi t._..h a mixture of commercial b park uses Properties t east and .sou th are zoned Planned Industrial and are a part of the Koll Bus ne as Center', Back r,�ur, I,.ation The first phase of the !Coll Bus consisted of Emir .moue �. oonsis t trier tenant buildings constructed in 197 Business Cente Pert 84 was 9. In 1984, sexsteitives Lands approved to allow reconstruction of Nimbus Avenue within a perti+c of the 100 -year flood lain, in return other ., c on a the +d 40 plain areas � were � earns ,� +� "' �dsid maintain the ekisting flood plain elevation. Reconst. #INAL ORDER CPA 94-0004/1ON 94.0006 Nzmbus Cente r Associates " .1 J permitted further develoapment of the Icoll Bueinesa Center.-; The subject property was developed in .1985. Dn August 22, 1994 the planning, Commission " conducted a Public Hearing cocecation ,this .regoluest •a �3c to the find +�.th ntli.a ref stacil eppsove this appli j g 4. fit Iaf�rtni� o�n..co ..��ac': ;x�tio�nt The . parcel Business Center.... which" was developed w:t h, in line tenant " suites and a Burger . King "Restaurant. The property Owner hss proposed' to c , redesignat .: the Comprehensive Flan and' Zoning Ditstrict Map from its .,current L;Lght industrial' and Panned industria4 comprehensive " Plan" Map and zoning District" Map dedig ►tions to General Comittercials aite5 current Planned ,Tnduatrial ',designation 'a limited number of basic retail uses are allowed: The applicant has requested this lair. l use a mendzient because , the limited number of commercial . uses permitted under, '4 the Planned industrial. Designation Ms limited the range of tenants which are permitted to lease. suites ite�. The subject SW Sehol3s• ' s highly visible to 'motorists' au i Road.' � ., es and pedestrians traveling on �'Y sad the a►�plic� tat e s visibility the center has historic l y y tha�C due to tme sit large rather than priimarily' from o£ its cu ®tomes from the. area atr industrial; tenants - wi within the Noll Center . aggna_ gn_mentss„ The Engineering Division has reviewed the "proposal following comments: provided the The applicants have submitted a statement in support of their request for the map amendment and rezone that indicates the. traffic generate rri by the change in uses allowed under the general' commercial zone will not be greater existing , the .'industrial .zone.' in the statement,' they eater that those allowec1 b tl�f note that the ex g Spear's in the center exceed the number rewired by the proposed zone change. The existing site takes access frot `SW "Nimbus Avenue t from a driveway located a sufficient distance from, the intOrsection Of SW Scholia Ferry Road that provides minimum coalicts with the traffic at the signalized Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue: intersection of SW Scholl: Since no new construction is pro osed, we concur that 'any change to the traffic + impacts of the Project p will be minimal. In addition, no y City y, y ms. substantial impacts are li�cel on they t'it utilit s ste Therefore, we have ob j sotion s to the proposed zone change. City of Tigard. '!3uilding Division, General Telephone and Electric* Portraitd; General Electric, City d` ." hays' offered, no comments or objections. e�r+ad the application* eandohave r Tualatin �ialle Fire and Rescue* reviewed No other comments have be en received; . ; 4. FINDGtS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant approval c,,titeria in ti ie case are onprehensiv`e; po1.1.2* . a .. , S .1..4, 8.1.1, and i2.2'. " and Conmr�nity D ave .o' licies i l l � Cede sections 18.22* 18.32 and 18 ,62, - ?:UM ORDER CPA 94- 0004/ZO �� -O0� 6 ui.m tit" enter ,Asetociaktei U. e ti Section 19 . 22.040 seta forth the atandardt and pzoceduress , or amendments to, the Zoni;ig Hap wIsich have been : reviewed as follows • ''ai rove approve with conditions or 'to A ; ss+ao�mdaticsa or � a decisiaa to 'Pp • Ap deny an ay ligation for a jai- judicial asendtlat shall be based t on a.Y:i. of the fal'lowng standards: The app i sable comprehensive plan polioies and map dwiignatAon 'ants .the. change will not advessely affect the health, safety and belt 1, of the e;o�msasaaity�s The following are the applicable ;Comprehensive PTan Poiiciea relats3d: to this requesslt and how the application adds seed ea h criteria is , reviewed following each policy. Plan Policy ;1.1.2 ` requires that in order to approvela n e iu►af- judis al �eistent. with applicable plan policies, that a ! change e change cc. as ,asre>�st to the+ Plan, the City must find that: as� o� physical, consistent Po cirawupstGaneos has occurred since the Original designation, or these 0VidaSCS of a change in the netl3,ghborhood or community which affects the subject parcels. Alternatively, the City .must find that a tailtak41 wag made in the or iginal designation Along with development of the Koll Business Centex, the larger Tigard and Beaverton Area has experienced Significant growth. The remaining properties within the .Nimbus Center; havo been developed since 1979 with a 'mixture of light industrial ;uses. Due to its location the Y� ;- Center. . s�ness wider subject propert will continue to serve cuatomera from a wid than the Koll Bu area Ia. By permitting the site to be rezoned, a greater range of commercial would be ,pitted. These aervic�s are expected uses and services to be used by both citizens of the area at large and tenants Of the Koll Business. Center, The primary readons for this amendment relate to how the preee vt toning of the property limits the types of commercial uses which can locate: at the Site The Planned n contains reatrictionsg which relate to a "development Industrial al zone p g are developed on a cam lex Which is � grtbu• of buildings which dingle parcel. This restriction limits several of the major commercial uses to up to 20% of the total building square footage of a development complex or p mp es such as General Retail Sales, Convenience Sales, Eating and Drinking Lasstablish ents etcetera. The applicant states that this limits the typei of commercial uses which can take place at the site and has put this commercially developed site in dil:ect 'competition with the Nimbua Industrial Parr. for industrial 'tenants which are often not suited to locate within a suite in a commercial center, . is j aatified based on the existing general. commercial ypeim amendment + P the entire site. Develsapimet Code is developed over restrictions presently limit the commercial glees which can be provided at this site and hap restricted fully leasing the site for commercial assess. Because of its location, the adjoining areas have changed. The Koll BUianesss Center hats, been built ottt with, approximately one million square feet leaseabie space.. Thio change center incrta ..n'The aat a disadvantage in tarts of. has placet�, the .. � the hess been develo° ed a ecificall to serve, the facility° are park areas attracting industrial � �e+q�tireame�tta .sue al tenants, j ,� of industrial users whereas ``the subject Site hass industrial been developed. tor' P P y ccmm ercial usos. nen Policy 2,.1.1, Attacs that the City shall ,maintain at Oh cltizon` involvement program and shall assus. that Citis r will np be FIKAL ORDER Cp4 ' 94.O004/Zdg 94-0r06 Nimbus Center Assoc es C7 provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning. process. The applicant ,provided notice of and conducted a'' meeting for interested property owners wit a '250 . foot radius of ; the effected property. The CIT repres►ntative for this area was . also notified of the neighborhood ' Notice is being provided of the Planning Commission and City Council Public Hearings for this proposal. The site war also posted with' a sign indicating the type of , land use amendment proposed for . this site. Pl,+ssn Policy 5.1.4 states that the City shall' ` ensure that new commercial and industrial development shall note:: encroach into residential amens that have not been designated for 'commercial, uses. This poli^y is satisfied because the ' subject property is not presently zoned for residential use: Plan Policy 8.1.1 states that the 'City shall. plan; for a safe and efficient street and roadway system ''that meets er rrsnt• needs and anticipated future .growth and daveloprdemt. This policy is satisfied because this property has frontage on SW Scholia Ferry Road (State Highway 21.0) designated an Arterial Street on the City of Tigard Comprehensive Transportation P1en kW. The existing roadway pattern is expeci;ed to accommodate the minor increase in traffic volume resulting from an approval of a acme change on this site. Plan Policy 13.2.2' provides the locational criteria for General Commercial zoning. The applicable locational ariterla specified is e the following/ Chapter Comprehensive Plan ere a ter lZ of the Comprehensive Spacing and locational criteria require that the cexaastercir4l area shall not d a to residential districts a heavily ' developed ligh � ind than two sides. This site is i' ` area. The site is buffered from existing residential Us�esuto the ial west by Fenno Creek. The scale of the project shall be ;compatible with the surrounding uses. The site was developed with an linear brick sinOle story building with 1easeable suited. .A single story brick 'Burger King __ .developed toWards the street coaoa�r of the reetauram� wsa� e,3s9a d propevi y. Through the sit` development prooes8 this structure Wass found to be compatible with , design of adjoining a xis�ting and planned development within te area. No .revisions tat, the t iite are anticipated as a result' of this amendment.: Any . futurin Changes' will also be reviewed for compatibility With surrounding aces Sits access Criteria require a l) the propelled area shall not create traffic direct acc traffic safety probletas; 2) the site �ihall traffic cos�,ges as■nfroiata major colleatcslr +o= Asterial sttreet# littd 3) � thisstiranlspertation shall be ava .a able. to the site. The aappre val traffic safety roblemss 'The comRnercias ca er i 'ak °i.on p .. re$ul ' or txa � center :ins used tin s�' di.o .g for a limited range General Commercial type oases ' presently. At1 traffic, volumed due to *vended c .. increase ected but at the time the Bite wash 'developed ti Street ea expected , ementa serving the site were °developed : ant i1ation, of late improVementa within the entire itch: usinessss Center being leased for Industrial Park: need which qetieratdi eii' filar 'traffic impaactss r Allowing a wider range of commercial lifted at this site Will. not create traffic congestion or safety problem for the larger area. Due to the design of the existing buildings on the Site and the potential types ca.' commercial uses that could utilize the Site improvements, direct added impacts to adjoining streets. as a result FINAL oRbER CPA 94w0004 /ZON 94- 00.06 Ali 0bue Center social« PAGE . 4 H OE w of this land 'ease amendment is ; „Minimal. Direct site access ices presently provided ° to SW Nit*us 'Avenue. 'No new driveway access proposed with this applica,tion;. Transit 'service '. is available to the *ite from SW .Scholls Ferry Road. !uture site, modification to the property will be reviewed through 'the elite development review process for any additional ittpactnr,to the street system.' Locational criteria also requires, that the site be of a sizes which can accomodate projected uses and that the sit. ' possess high visibility. This criterion; is satisfied for the 2.43 acre site The existing cite improvements accommnodate a variety, of uses permitted within the General Comsrtterctel Zoning District: This site ie also highly visible from adjoining roadways; I act 'Amassment is determined b' ' . addressing the following criteria: ' the prO j act shall be compatible with the tsrias 1� the ��.a1s of . surrounding urea; 2) the site configurations shall be such that tls privacy ' of adjacent eon- commercial , user cart be ' aaaint wined 3) 'it Shall be possible to incorporate unique sites features , into the site design and development plan; `, and 4) the associated lights, noise and activities shall not interfere with, adjoining aAn -con rcial uses. This policy is satisfied becausc the impact to vrurrou ,iding land uses is expected to be negligible. The scale of tlm present en development on tis site was previously determine with the surrounding uses. Futu ce ..odif icatione to the site improvements will also be reviewed for compatibility with adjoining land uses. Section 18.32 sets forth the pr'ocedut,:al requirements for review of Quasi - J'udicial. Plan Amendments. Subsection 18.'32.090 (D) and (E) set forth the review requirements for Quasi-Judicial Plan ` Amendments. ` This section, requires that the Planning Commission review proposed ' amendments atia provide a recommendation for accordance with the requirements ire�ents. of The application leas been processed in accor y Development Code Section 18.62 ; sets forth the development standards for property within the r4eneral Commercial Zoning District The subject site meet3 these t'eduirements because the pazrcel average width is greater than 50 feet. The existing structures d not exceed 45 feet in height. The site coverage is less than 85'pbrcent and the landscaped area is greater than 15 percent. The existing totes on the site are permitted uses within the Proposed Ceaeral commercial Zoning Designation. 2. The 'statewide planning goals adopted under Oregon Re vi sd Statues e rehenss i.ve Plash has been acknowlesdgedlen and Chapter 191, until aacknoerled smsnt of the Ccsp► . rellaeAas v�s p ordinaacsag; The,C mp Each amendment to the plan isss provided to tie appropriatae Std! Fe envies for review. Notices of filing of this application iae ' ieen rovided to the State i3eparttnent of Land Conserv&tion and *e .c�pmre nt for' comme et more than 4eS days pxior ° to 'tnu `final 5 arinr on. this' application as re!gcired under State, of Oregon Ad .aistra<ati ve Rule If approved by the Coy Council, t t' ice o,f. Adoption 660 -18 -020. = roved will also be provided to the De partment of Land Co"tset at .on and Development. 3. The applicable atandards of any pr vision of this code or other l cab1s implsmeratiag ord .nenca ectiou 1 ►.62 oaf tht Community asgp . ' j for �le T�e�telopment Cade, sets forth the development staaas#a; General Co n texci+al Zoning �ristrict Thi 'sub act ss ate kaeeet a these requirements becalms the lot. width &garage a greater t'hau, 550 feet. The existing ecalms res do not exceed e5 feet in he ight The site than 85exrce►t aunt 'fie ,i.inprcv3.c�uss surfaces is lees � ; co'�era; a with p ORDF t CpA 9 -000 /ZO 9�► =f1t�0 nimbus 'Ceia►te;t' .„0„. FAR 5 • ladecaped the `:site are 404e4ter .,than' 19 ;percent er v �ttted . in the General Con n rre s� ng,..uells ;; t District`; �, : ividena ` of ' oham'�ie th i neighberh or oc aitj , or a , star '0r inaonsistau -y ins th ' co s�rhensiv. ► ea �or toning rap as it.'rs1a es to G�. property Mhig is than eub oct of `4the app1iaations Along with the 1011; gusine�css.; Centerr thte; l aarger Tigard and Bee►verton Area hays 'exper::enced aignificaiit growth. Due to its lo±~at bn tine subs act property grill continue to e'serve .cu st he o hers, f rem a -tides etas than primarily the tenants in t ! lColl '.Bus .. � 1 , t ;primary,: reasons 'for 'this amendment relate to physicah Broth of t1 a greater 'aria;; the physical location'. o the site +and' the `vle sign .61"''' the ' site itprovtemente which ,were `apprt+ ad at ,th .e , to atidh. �y •permitting the sii.te .;to be re oned �� g stater ,range of c�m�aerci�, l uses . would bee ermitted'. se + ry ces are �(exp cte' 1 to he and ,services p a'he � .. .. Y, used, by •botls. citizen ''of the area at Ierr,ge and . tenatts of tho Krill ,nosiness .Center., Additional 'space ; ihic °h', is leaated within. the- center may 'create.. ad litiona , employment oppoptunitie�a� far an eta residents The Planned . Industrial .zone 1owat Grp to 20 perry :ent of a development coinpleut to be , •:= 'ntil*zed • wits li ited comenerc�lal 'uses . `°here °>is concern that, approval of. change to then land use! des .gnation •may,.lead to redevelopment of °,industrial sites w►it in the 1011' Busisnese 'Centesr for commercial use o However, t e not expected::• that the Nol l Businese Center grill redevelop' wits ' additional onrnercial development duir to , the recently . developed •'nature of. !ages within the center. Future: applications for development or redevelopment will be reviewed for conatistency with rise a ref pnr et 3taandarde of the Planned' Industrial ;Zone which limits the► total., .of actuate footage which can bta dt c oped for connnercial note, In ,terms, of design the site functions preieently:' ac 'a feral e , can be' 'isa d to halve bee made .n _Commercial.site _ so that a m ®tak - f. limiting the, range the `cormnercial 'tsetse' •`permitted ion ,.fie site to • convenience services designed primarily for nee by tenants Within the 10ll Business- Center. This .and Auls+o amendment Mill ; allow add tioxal tenants whit n ic i h o rVit Iodate: i n an existn g conerial� eri 3 1g bYe ected 'impact to adjoining areas DlCX XC1N The city Council approves 'the r3quested Comprehe< ive P1a i. Amendment for Washington County' Tax Map properties , 4AA, •tam loco 1900 from Lights industrial and Planned Industrial respectively tiro +general Coin�mercial C- . The City Council f inda,. that the change will promote the ``g nar -.oel a rat' the city nd ca3.;1 not. bt si i y � eln' y surrounding land uses ficaat diet r�.meatal or It ie further ' - orde red that the applicant and rattier to .these: proc;eerUr'`gs be notified of the entry of this Ordet. FINAL Q RDF� CPA, 9� -wCOe �C N 9e 000 aoate Aso ati a • t I. ENDA',: iITEI.. r Agenda of CITY O TIGARP`A ORE 1O Ck UNCIL . AGgNDA ITEM SLR: .; SUE/AGENDA eMerely a nee Er J P PA2E ?�9 ' : %'� "� ` � ° ° C EP HEAD OK CI: OK ..°. > ===ter ===Q.,== _ == =ft. g74= m === = = == = === ... ====i ..= ==.7eft=tee== == =vs 2':=0 = u"tr'!�.'.— SLR— ."*..� C o.^, S unCSc � t i ] ..�a tGFP.' rov d..e . , a CCS' Som �.` p....r. Y. �ehen. SLs^ LSi3 v. e L'�19PF l'" an dSSeap".SC."S ,men• d nrntE . oc (Mg tt zndu tfal ) to C _ (General Commercial) and a Zone, change request f om n us x' �l Park) (General Commercial) ? • apse =say w: =asa =:sc�e�iaessa BIAPPtflagIRMIWIOLLOU Staff recommends that the City Council approve Comprehensive Plan Amendment #94. -0004 and Zone Change #94 -0006. ===7==================================== == ft = == = == =d,= =*== The amenOme,ht concerns a parcel of property located at 10115 SW Scholls Ferry Road Which is at the south west corner of SW Scholls Fero .°y Road and SW Timbus Avenue The site is within the Kull Business Center Industrial. Park development and ±, cia ' � � . The. Z -F � ,� commercial p and , Is zoned I - on�, limits commer �. uses � s�uc)'i, as rei taurants and retail sales to a maximum of 20% o `' f the entire development p The property rd c. r change is presently developed with a fast cry ex fih� proposed. sed fo fo d restaurant and a commercial tenant suite building ; „z� restauran g a drive through bank. The t -P commercial use restrictions have limited °tth din that includes the range. of Prospective tenants in the commercial buildi building and made it more difficult tr~ ros ectxve te�dnt - � ler�sE? existing space. . zone was to protect industrial land inventories P „ The . intent of the I P �, m acts of the propose, .Lm�� any a and of tet;L, of commercial use industrial . allowed The of f ice uses Planning versus .. , park gi g' Life in this area. The Plannin ses arm ne +�. � � C P P g c�mmercia�, uses omnna.ssion„ g recommended approval at its hearin � on August 22! 1994. The applicant's statement, Commission Minutes, proposed Final Order and Ordinance are attached, UTHER .l'TERNATI;VES CC1S. ►;� ro Comprehensive Plat Map Amendr�rdinanCe thereby ' p� 'v�.n 'eh� re��zested 1. Approve t Amendment arid\ Zoning Map Change and e.dOp .in the P g Mra � report as findings in support off;. the decision. 2-- _--.__ . p ent , and �Zonin Ma- m rehensive Plan tap. Amendm . 2 Den the Co' � g p change reqti PISCAL NC)TES o, direct fiscal impacts if a P `a. ._s * iXBIT CITY OF TZQAP10 CI.' "Y. COUNCIL PIi7AL. OADU .TPINAL ORDIR ZRCLU DING VT/WINGS I CONCLUSIONS NITS RIM= TO AN APPLICATION' TPA A CL R NIVS Haut Ai1uD t' AND Z '`IN C itIN 'APPLICATIONS ..R$QU 9 BY TUN SUS 'C ,A9SOCflTE8 e The Tigard City Council reviewed the application below ' at a public hearing on flieptetber 27, 1994: The City Council approver the request'. The Council ,has lased its decision on the facts, findings and ttonclusions noted below. ▪ FACTS • Genera ,, x fo m t� ion CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 94 -0004 Zone Change ZON 94 -000 REQUEST: A request for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from (Light Industrial) to c -d (General Commercial) and a Zone Change request from I -P (industrial Park) to C -G (General Commercial) . APPLICA1f: Nimbus Center Associates 811 NW .3 catii, Suite 102 Portland, OR 97209 OWNERS: REPRESENTATIVE: same.,,` Richard Allen Bali sanick and '1,1ovadt One Main Place 101 SW Main St,Ieet, Suite 1 ■.00 Portland, OR 91204-2274 LOCATION: 10115 Nimbus Avenue , tax lot 1900; The site is venue �WC Y'M 1S1 ��aAA located at the southwest carnet of Center. Ferry Road and �5��'SOho1ls�Fer R o SW Nr.tsbus Avenue within the !Coll Business Center. . Vtzcinit _ nforms tioa o e ' a . acted . in site and is located on the �southweet The s 4 l . 4r d and NimbuS Avenue wthi inesss c ,. �E.ctsiteis2 Schol�.s F`sr. Roa 'nl. gn the 1011, ,Bus .. Y .. •.: ess ' rr� ro �W Center which consists of a roxzmatol s So acres ad oiin 9'araao �C ee C venue �P a 1 y .. �, g Center.. SW Nim ,�s A south of SW Scholis Ferry Road' west of the 211 State HigiaWay. °anno creed. borders the entire business Center to the ,rest. Areas to 'the north of '.S' Ferry a with: n�,he Clty Of Beaverton and are developed with. a mixture of conunerci. ..... .. ; park uses Properties .to the , east Scholl�t Fer Road ar and south are zoned P a1 and btls tr `> a ' Centex', ' d Ir,.:lustra.a };� ,end. are a ps�rt of thr� ItQ 13� OtteineSS lanne The first P 11 suss esse Cencear� ccnsis ted of dour xr atz`ia .`.. hangs c the in 1979 n 1984, senssit ve ands Pettit 5i tenant bpupldin s cons, owf' rec+�ansi: _ .. -,. _ plain, , .a !,�.�avL� ortlQn 84 was a roved to all ruction of Nimbus Avenue wi' hlxs. a • �.n 'return 'Other a ion + t ted ` to of the 100 year �7.00d lain; main # h , regard taro the existing flood �ilain �. ewati�+z� rt ORDER CAA 944004/2ON 94 -000 enter 0 Itt act p c fitted further development of tie Roll 'Business Centrer. The s ubj p :Operty was developed in .1988 in c,� ar Pula li g August ' 22, ..1994• the plana�ing Coms�n�sfa�sion; consducted .a ° concerning this request, and recommended that the City Council approve thi► �. a � ication Sub j ec;t to the findings 'Within this repor,� t } The site i,s a single .parcel within the !Coil Business Center which was developed with in line tenant suites and a aurger KingRs'staurant: The developed arty, oW n'�: .! .proposed to red saigflatei the Cot rprehena� ve .•Plan ` and p p Zoning '`Disti'iot . map from its current night Sndustr .al and planned Industrial, arehensive Plan Map and zoning DM,astrict Map cesignat .ons to ' : Under the. sites curren ; Planned i' '4ustrial, zoning �, GenYeral, I�on�ercial." deSignaticrt a limited number of basic retail uses' , are allowed. applicant i, z:.requested this land use namei\dment because the lisited The app nuuter of commerc ial use s permitted under the Planned . Industrial Designation: has limited the 'range of tenants wh4.cn are rm tto to lease Suites at the site., The subject property $.s, highly and pedestrians traveling on SW Scholia Ferry Road. The applicant states ! #lue to the site's visibility' the center had historically drawn many t, rather than primarily , from the its cuetcnmers from . the .area at �,arge =. � ' of induce L �L ria tenants within the Koll Business Center. ';, �. S=a2 Cosec► The Engineering Division has reviewed- the proposal; and provided the • following comments icf heir re, • eat fns The applicants have submitted a';stateMent in support. qu the map amendment . and re ..one that • indicate,e' the tra f f 1C generated by the change in uses a11owO: wider the general: >commercial• zone viii zot be greater, that those a�ilowed by the industrial zone. to the statement, they none that the ex ,eting�' parking Space' in be cerit er emceed the. 'number requizad by the gproposed zone change. The existing si to takes access from SW Nile ue Aventie from a , driveway located a 'suffilient distance from the intersection of S'W Sch011a. Ferry' goad that provides minimum couflicts with the traffic at tie signalized intersection o:i' SW _ Seholls Ferry Road and SW Nimbus ventne e s ed. be ur that any change tQ they ►scnstruct+ ion i proposed. we minimal. . � � .,. Since no new ew con In addition, no traffic impaotti of the project Y tems substantial imp4�tcts arz li�cdi. on the City utility etye� Therefore, we 'btive no objections to the proposed zone. changes Tigard B�.tilding Division, General Telephone and `Electric, tportia Gen• eral Electric, City' of Beaverton, Tualatin "Taile\ : 'Fire orand b. a Rescue ►bave. re=viewed the application licat�an, and have offered n�► commenat~s NO other comments have been received. FINDINGS AND CONCL'C8t0t The relevant approval criteeria in this case are Comps 1,1, 5 ,1, 4, 8.1.1, ahid, . 4 and e;�e tauntutt PoiP± es 1. �.� 2 i � : Code r' actions 18.22, 18.12 and 18.82. ' rt CRDFR �"PA 94.O004 `Z l 94 -0006 imtus t oti �hensive P3 veiopm+e ectioi 1a, • 22 ". 040, sets . forth the stari rd o which have been .revieewea ' the Zoang` Map • and procedurea fallouts •.. ;; .., �b recommendation or a dac iIion . to : approvre, ',approve w deny an applies:act for e.,r4uasi- judicial° amendment;. al og the following' ds: I(i or aaenti rien �:01d�►�C�nfr :�� t be bleed .'on .a Tha applicable comprehensive plan; policies f aignation and; the ' c aange will not ad'fer'sely' .affect the kaalth, 'iafety 'if:sadl laage, of the`'. cot nunity , Comprehensive Plan Policies related The .gol,ll�o�wzng are the �appgi�:ahse Come to this' request and how the application' addresses each criteria reviewed following each policy. Flan that -in order to approve c uta�r� -�v�e i ial the'' City must ind tl�iat the# change," ° e ' ame��acta�nt t® the �tlan, . , consistent with applicable plan :p►olie �+e`,� ` that a change of p)rlrea�.cal circumstances; has occurred since the original deese gnation err! is. evidence 'of a change iii �:heey°i neighbor hod or ccs uitgi 'which, affects the subject parcels. A1.ternativslys, the city *tot,' find that- a : mistake was made' ltd the with development of the Kolb Busi ses Center;'.. the larger Tigard and Beaverton Area has experienced significant: growth. { ' The tasiaining :properties within the Nimbus Centex have been developed siznces ?9. with a m nture of light industrial 'US 'location, the subject property 'will continue to serve ciusto ers° 0roirt a as��der area than the Ko11.Eusineas Center. By permitting the site to be rezoned, a greater range of coOmercial i uses and services would be permitted. These services are {expected° N at large and, to anta of the to be used by both citizens of the area a toR1. how the � present zoning of e property limits relate I to how t g reasons for th nits amendment t types of ° :..nt�3r, P r The primary comercial Uses which can locate at ; the site: The Planned Industrial zone contains restrictions, which relate. to a "development complex" which is a group of buildings which- are developed on a single parcel. This restriction lirite Several of, the major commercial uses to up to 20% of the total, building square footage of . r a `....p complex mpl for uses such as General. Retail Sales, �',evelc� went Con,renience Sales, Eating Drinking abl etcetera. The applicant states that this limits the types of conmercialutea which can take '.place at the site And has put this Commercially developed site in direct competition with the Nimbus Industrial Parley for industrial tenants which are often not suited to locate within a suite in a commercial center. The amendment iS juStified based on the existing general cottttriercial type improvements developed Over the entire site. Development Code p s : presentl y limit the cottmercial "trees which can . be P rovided at this Site and has restricted fully the site for Because of its' location the adjoining areas have changed. "rhe Roll BuisneEs Center hits ;c,een built but with cotttmer cial uses► 'approximately one million square feet leaseable space. This change has placed the center increasingly at a d.Sadvanta+ge 'i41 tee ot attracting industrial tenants. 'the adjoining industrial parr area has been developed specifically to serve the. facility. .requirements , i" ax , of industrial users whereas the, sub ect �, site- bas �ee� d�a�,op+ed con nercial uses Plan policy 2.141 stated that the city*. shah. aaaitiie an ongoing citizen !involvement _ program ;and .shall sure' that cit,L' it 'w ill ,beet e Pte+ 'c� at 8' sea �, �- t)c4 7C?l�' 94 D�iD6 �'siribuS i�eY:r.�r' I °� CPT o .ORDER -r I , 4 provided an oppOrtunitt to bii asesTottha „ process., The applicant 'provide' , not.i conducted for 'interested 'property 'oWnere*Within a 250 , foot radiu8 of the effected property:'; The' CIT,'„roPreeenteltiVe fori'thipAirea Was a1.0a, notified of the heighbOrhoddIneeting./-..,,,Notice,ie being .provided, a , , , the Planning Commistion and -City Council Public Hearings",fow, this” proposal. The site was. also postaU wth a ,sign indicatin , e of land use' amendment' prOposied for this , Plan Policy 5°4.4 states ;that: the 'City 'shall. •neur thrt n.v .1 cox and industrial development', Shall not incrdiCh','inte reaidential areas that haire net, bain, dealignatod,;6*.' qamitote4a1, .14114111.‘ This 'policy is • satisfied because the subject property .14, 'notr, ZmesehtlY zoned for resdentia1 uae. Plan Policy 8.1.1'utates 'that the City shall-plan, for a, safe, and , , efficient street Ind roadway syst94'..that =.eta current, .needa and anticipated future,,grOwth and development. This policy is satisfied , , • because this propert,y has frontage on SW Scholls petty load '(State Highway' 210)", deoignated i Arterial.' Street on the .City Of .Tigard,'•'. Comprehensive Transportati'ol1 Plan Map.' The existing roadway Pattern' is expected to accOmtodate the Minor' increase in traffic volume resulting from an approval, of a zone change on this tie. Plan Policy 12.2.2 provi(isi, the locational criteria fr 'General Commercial zoning. The, applicable locational criteria specified in Chapter 12 of 'the comprehensirfa Plan are the 2f...11oWingir; Spacing and locational criteria require that the cograercial shall not be• surrounded by residential, districts an More than tvto sides. This site is within a heavily deve/oped '..iftht industrial' area, The site I.E1 buffered from existing residential. uses to the west by Fanno Creek. ,. • , The scale of the project shall be compatible With the surromding • mess . The site was developed with an linear , brick single, Story building with leaseable suites. A single stork brilt .$urger King restaurant was also developed towards the 'ttreet corner of the property. Through the tit development process this structure was found to be compatible with the design of adjoirling exiting and planned development wiehin the Area, No revisions to the site are anticipated as a result of this amendment. Any future changes will also be reviewed for compatibility with surrounding uses site access criteria require: 1) the proposed area shall not create traffic congestion or traffic safety problems; 2) 'the Lite have direct ACCOISII from a major, collector or arterial istreis, and 3)' public transportation shall be available to the Site. The approval of this application is not expcted to result in traffic congestion or traffic safety 'problems. The existing .carnmecial center is Used for a limited range GeneraL, Commercial type uses presently. An increase in traffie volumes duc, to expanded commercial service; , - expected bUt at the time the site was developed all etreet •, iMprovements seving the site were developed in antidipation ibf site, • improvements within the entire Itell Einsineed Center being 10kased 'for' Industrial Park uses *Thich generate eiimilat traffic impaetti, ' ,.„ Allowing' a wider range Of coira ia.". ntre Uset ttt this Site create traffic congestion o safety problem for the larger area,. Niue to the detign of the eXisting buildings en the it 1,t;he votentiai types of dentmercial, uses that could utilize the site improveMente, direct added impactiir o adjeit?ir‘-ir Ptteett at a resnit , • ORDER CP A 94-0004/EON 94,0006 bl'irttbUs tteriter ,Associtttes' 1,,,A(31$. 0 J r it � Oia�e�ct , sits accaae� is mini�r�al . cif this land wge r amendment i �.� net driveway access i; presently •p' ,:wided 'ccl :3W ,1, . ,,,I.,,,,,,,„„..,;,,„..... enysc;, A �;cer :.a available to ,thc� pro osed with this : a`pplicat� �^0t. Trafeit ss r .rw • P, site from S$ S,cholas Ferry '�,oad. "7utur ®• ,ge e� de�relco�pme ti review! property will' be reviewed , „`throtagh ti p as to the'' at:reet isystem. roceas for aany additi a� n9 imp sct ore �airea that, th site be o t size whiff ' �catiosal c�ritoria ai■ � ;pQSe►�►�rs high. c • aaamodate pro; acted . v�,ese end -.,that the site au acc vaoibilitt "• This criterion ie , , s4t isfied. for ' `he ' 2.43 ci.cr' site. " T)e existing .•-site imrQVeiexats accomodate , a yariety 'of uses er" Ltted withinthe 'General 0ommercial ' Zoning,District : .This ;site 1 also highly visible from aijol�riVg, roadways'. �, 'r addrer sift/ th. f ollowin3.. impact l►ssogs ilaht is drtersiiuei bl, . criteria a . 1) the ''>ecale . of,,. tkOl ., prcr j ewt, shall be 0 0*tible : that' t%ie aeurrouuding uses; 2) the site t onfiguratiofls shall be such srivacy of adjacent ,non -o, s teial -nisi . can be. saintain ds siie shall be ;possible to iacarpora� ►�a 14ntYitpx�p •its teatv�res design and dvelOPs ut. plaf an 4) the associa lg d act vitlae iahal not interfere With adjoining Sow a omg4esc ai ue a This policy is satisfied becaUS0. the in pact to surrounding land ,uses is 'expected to be negligible. ',the. scab.®, of the ca ent; m b on this site was previously eter intd to heo ms a eith e surrounding r uses PUture modifications, to the site improveUtehts ,sill ....alto be reviewed for compatibility with adjoining ladd uses..• ctior 1.8.32 sets „forth the grocedu ratil , squire eats foie review t�f uasi- ju S for ,1.8.32 (D) aod. Is): set forth th+e . auds.cial Plan Amendment9. �a�abaeG. c, This section 09 review requirements for asi- C'rudiCia .. Plan Am►P eS a ' :Thi eHse and . provides rec mmend tion 'for action: to the:, he' ity Council The application provide a reco 3.xentente of the Comanuni t�,� has' been. processed in accordance 'with the " requ . Develo invent Code. aectio development standards for property' with,' tza the c n 1.8.62 sets forth the de � meets basis g General Commercial Zonin District. The aub1e g 'width is greater than: 50 'feet:: ocause the arcel average w_, �c s requirements b P exit „ esr do not excei�d �5 ' feet in height,. Th+B ate cove ge is lessrthan 85 percent and the landscaped" area is greater than firm. es" within the percent The existing' ses on t�eas�.te are permute g 1r eral Commercial Zoning gna ua3. gxagoeed Gen The statewide planning g .,;ti, d s' hR $5 d Statues 1� 2 Dale ,ad +� � d der ore .0.00:. ;� . please, si>tis�a :..197 until acioaa�o►la�dgemsara� Of than � �' � se ordinance$ The mprehensi to Plan., has,' appropriate been tango d. Each Chi te= 197, e �O Agenoies� mpndmentM to the plait i, p 'Notice, of f;ilinc of this app a on has provided a w ` � bees: , for review. Not d he to the State Depa7.' meat of ' add Conservation and bevelopment tor:, , comment more than 45 days prior to the final bearing ' on Chia application as required �,tunder State of Oregon. Adminia 56'1- 19 -02A. If approved ' by „ tht City Co'uncil, Notice of Adoption Will also be►r+avded to the Department cif %and Conservation and Development at The applicable srtandaards of any provision of this cods or other a licable ;lemen•tin ordinance# $ection 18.62 of the, Comanunity Development code sets forth fiche developm tt staundard i for the General Commercial Zonin District•.: The sul lect site meet- these re iremeots becauSS 'the lot width average is greater "50 fe t. e ructures fest iu height �T a .twe The- existin st do not +exceed ?�� coverage with i mprevious surfaces ias less than 85 pee d :the ZN ORDER. CPA 9 4 0 F .. . flO4lZON 844606 'Nihttrtua Center aioi:iat:es Ili r • ‘, is a*a74Pe'47: t,',,' greater `..!•,'...",'.•: ' 'e'i. r C,.' . e. ....... , -ex i . uses c he 7te ite 0**11*6 : 4'rc zoning ,District iv.flS of change in • neighborhood 0 ... . or nacjnaisie4ey: ,iii,,,,,,the•COIIPH,rehtlaii-T-i'p' an-;Or',ii zoning '''', . as rit'reiiiiieit, ,. to the property 4ihichiis.`,thaiiis.i.ict'ot the de*St. t, ii0P14,01k,*ost t:::-, ,tler149::h'';.41ftli'''''e'Itheert15,061,34i3r:4133::.;;a1:.117:18fIi4i'°;T:.t7kefjat.hi)..14,if,O,ii'4:"i4;!Pti:::;,;‘ti.,7°:,;:!'''7;de.,,t,'"'",..4:','"';°,;'v7:;:;;::,,,;,:,,;:*,,,,',,,',..„,,.:,:,,„,,g,',, ' lOostiOrk,t111:;,:,::: ' 1.irq:il.Y, tbef.:,enzi.;:t ,,,,, ,... 7 .',ii","!, ...7, Koll , . .,,.."-ei p......,,,_____:: '__._____ _:_._ , , 40.'.. . " amendment , - , ' : ';o,ti'l'fie,tiPi4heri,aticda . , design , 'T1\ primary •f r this :".relate . , ... and 0*. •.:t' he ''gr , , ' it tjie, physidal. location , this atiotf.,..,"By• : •,,' ., : , ,'',' , , ••, ; , of tha!astiyeer„.:a*Inpr%.oN.,,,etnott4,,, which were approved at ,I,t .I! ,,- . 0e ...,, .. . , , ,,, i ,, '' ,,,,-,' • „, . ,„, • permitting the, site to ' be rezoned a' greater range of commerca,„&i., uses and:Servides,woUld;,be permitted. . 'These .services ;are expected o be ,-' ,,*, • .- - used by both citizens of ',the, area at largit4,0dr/tonants-,Of the 'Itooll•'-:' Business Center: n Additicintai.';'.,CPitge which is '.eased within the center'. • • ' ' ' may . 'create ' additional 1 . emplOYment ' opportUnities': for ' area residents. ,',' ' • •' . . , ' ' ,,.„, .,•,,, ' ' „ ,, „ ,. , . • i ..,„. ,.. , ": ,, ,,,,.. ',., . . , .'''''''‘i•,-.',:,--,,,,!...,',,,,::',' -.1).-•;- , ',,,,-',',.., . 1 '., •. '1 ,, , , , -', ' - • , . '. ''': '.,. • Vhi,!lanned, Industrial ,,zone allows, up to:2 percent of a- development ••'. cOmplex', to be iit-,!-Lzed,' with Ilimited ' Commerdial. Uies:.. , It.htere, ia*: concern that approv4l'of, change to thit•.-leirtd'Uise deitignittiOn.•may-,,lead'•'. to redevelopment of ,indusitria.A...8ites'Withiji'thii. Koll Business Center or '''commercial use. :However, i• it is not ,,expected : that the 'Kola Business Center ' will redevelop :''with r•.', additional '''comMercial• development due ,, to the 'recently; developed , nature, of 'industrial 110458:,.' within the center'.: . ' Future • applications ::.; zop development ' or , ,... ... the ,t, readVelopment will be reviewed for' consistency with, tn development Standards • of the ;Planned. Industrial gone which limits the total of square footage which can be developed' for , commercial use. ,'• . ' '' : . ' ' ' ',. ' ' In termil , of design' the site funations "P,resently as a General Commercial site so that a .mistake .catvhe said to have been made in limiting the Itiange, the comr.ercial' uses permitted or the site to convenience services de-Signed.' primarily I for use by tenants within the ,•1e13. Busines s Center. this ' land ., use * amendment will allow additional tenants tehich provide commercial go00 and services to locate in an existing commercial„ center with negligble expected impact to adjoining areas. DSCXEIXON 4 n The City Council oves the requested Corni)rehensiVe Plan Intendment for Washington county "ra's Map properties 1S.134AA, tax lots 1900 from tight Industrial and Planned Industrial respectively to Geners.1 Cormiterciali The City CoUrici/ finds that the change will, promOte the general Welfairet, the City and will not be signafidantly detrlmental, ,or injurious to surrounding land uses. it is further ordered that the applicarit e,;zAS partied to these proceedings „ be notified of the entry Of this or er. Itql:Lti ORDER cpA 94-41004/20N 94-c006 Nimbus . eite AssOdiateta PAGE ' ,,,,•,, I ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS ANC CONCLUSIONS i 3MPREHENSI ! PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMEI QUESTED BY TIME NIMBUS CENTER ASSOCIATES, (CPA Z 1EREAS, the : applicant has requested a ampr'hensive P a Amends rents from Light Industrial to General C m er ci C: a INCTM 1 S134AA, tax 'lot 1900).' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held; a public ;hearing: on concurred with the' Planning ,Division's recommendatkin for appro WHEREAS, the Tigard Cif Council held `a public hearing, on the request' September 2 , 1994 the Planning Commission, to review the applicants propog� the staff re rr, the recommendation and to receive public testimony. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: consistent with all relevant criteria 1: The proposal is �� ` era based upon the � a� findings, and conclusions noted in the attached final Order and m identified as Exhibit A; .. .. _ . SECTION 2: The e C iy ounrrsi anc�rs the Planning Com. mission an111 recommendations and a pp roves the request to redesi g nate the d parcels rcels dustrateo on the attached map (Exhibit A) a ComprehenSive Plan . designator' of General Commercial and (General Commercial) ton'ng. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective days after �it� .passage ,.b tai Council approval by the Mayor, an postin'gY b he iL recoil' or, LEGIBILITY STRIP 1., ‘13 ) TN y cwoa r • 4 'YlitIc I... 1 illtmllal ,. Nig/ r..1 MINT a t_41'1,1: vollgr• Oat; 1. • . in: z III ow liziolgr:ila %it .,0 'A lin in IN at IIII III ir Ni h%.1 0 \\01111- 14" a IN 0' 171:PAlt4r lilt iqt `•• \--Arie IL Iliffivil:iii italizimiii atSi441111141ift:O*1.tjt 'dr ,11112: :i : 0 1q1. I I s do 11 111 ; as 11/ a, 'II 14.1.1611tioh 4 O. 4 0'$ - 11,1, te. i :111 IA 1.11 I:1 174:ift',11 14-4144 Al di Fri Airl Nitiliiii7-7uproper 41 r 14 "AO 1_111 4.1:11114 el 41r is11-1781 OR 1.41!4tt' c 2 to la - r al* I I aria a ma. IC 0 feu - r r Statement in Support of Application for Quasi�7udiCia . comprehensive Plan NAP Amendment and Zone Change oduction Thin application is for a quasi-Judicial comprehensive plan map amendment from t,, f,ght Industrial ''`X L) to General Commercial' (C- G) and a zoning map amendment from Industrial Park (1 -P) to Genera. Commercial (c _G) for the Nimbus bus Center . The : subject property is located at the intersection of SeW. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. Nii bus Avenue, with access onto both streets. The property is fully developed, with a freestanding restaurant (Burger King) and a commercial cuter of approximately 22, 500 rentable square feet. The property does not share its street access with any surrounding g Property. The property includes a landscaped parking area , .w .th approximately 95 parking spaces. The applicant has no current plans for any additional development on the subject property if 'the property is rezoned. Indeed, the potential for significant changes in the density of; development on the property is limited by the size and shape of the site and the applicable code requirements for lot coverage, landscaping, and parking., Under the urr ent I -P zoning, the permissible range of commercial uses is limited, and a maximum of 20% of the development complex may be devoted to (1) convenience semis and p ig h (2) children's y ; ( , eating drinkn establishments; (4) personal services facilities; and (5) sales. applicant seeking the `change to the c G designation so that the subject . - 1 es ., The a i� cantproper��can be leased 5) general retail sa x • . 'without the 20% . limitation. • -�� iota for a full range. of commercial uses. withsi� Development in the, adjoining P district, which includes many thousands of square feet ci,f flex space, does not currentl utilize the full 20% allowance -- and given its lack of . o. Moreover, there is no . ever to dtoee visibility, is unlike�,,y e danger that additional areas in the adjoining 1�-P district would be . e zoning; the subj subject property' converted to +Senera�l Commercial ; .._ is uniquely situated, based on its location and visibility. the adjoining I -P zoned property would not satisfy the locational requirements for the C-G district. II. Approval Standards Section 18.22.040 of the Tigard community Development Code Sets the standards for quasi- judicial maP amendments. The standards which must be addressed are: A. he a . cab e com s a. .. o . •ea.' to_," 1 -a •e .t '` e t . wyr re of 112-25 mn na�t . the: heath, safe nd _.we� M' Applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designation The comprehensive Plan an establishes the following description of the General Commercial zone: ',General Commercial areas are intended to provide for major retail goods and services. The uses classified p. as general commercial may involve drive -in services, large space_ users, a combination of retail, service, the v p • wholesale and repair services or provide services to traveling , public. The uses range from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, drive -in restaurants to laundry establishments. It is intended that these uses be adjacent to an arterial or majol,t Cotlector street." Response: Current uses on the prope2rty include the restaurant, a service, store, dental office: a travel stop " , a '��"y cleaning eying service. However, more than half of space in the commercial building (i.e., excluding the raeestand ng restaurant) is currently vacanzt. General Commercial zoning will allow this property to compete on an even footing with other high-visibility properties, because it will be possible to lease to prospective tenants without the limitations inherent in the current n p l-g zoning. The Comprehensive Plan establishes the fol criteria for the General Commercial zone: Spacing and location: The commercial Area is not surrounded by residential districts on more than two sides. Response: The subject property , does , not abut any residentially subject prope�cty, however, the Nimbus area to the south of the property. There is a resid zoned that resideant au'�us Center is separated from ro a l area by a landscaped buffer on the, subject Property and by a greenway through which Fanno Creek runs. Access: The proposed area or expansion of an existing, shall not create traffic congestion or a traffic co Safety problem. Such a determinatiOn shall be based on Lin street capacity, existing and projected traffic r en � and the s traffic Generating ' ' �evsambear . of turning volumes the speed liem cl�a��aertenr� istics� m�v the ui various types of uses ��, of tb Response: The proposed change will not alter the existing development. Although the ranee of permitted c; ercial use 9I cram , s will be expanded by in change, there is no reason :� .. r y significant achan a lrlhtr�han��h�rati�on or the c son toe act. an g trip g reation of traff ic congeztion or traffic safety problems. IIELEGIBILITY STRIP czsss: The site shall have direct access from a'aajor collector er arterial street. Response The site has eisting direct 'access from S. W,. Scholls' Ferry Road, which is designated as an arterial. *Access: Public transportation shall be available to the site or genaral agree. Response: The Tri -Wet No. 45 bus line serves S.W. Scholls Ferry Road in the immediate vicinity of the site. Bite CL aracteristics: T e site shall be of size which can accommodate prssant and projected uses. Response: The site is already fully developed, and includes adequate parking for full commercial use of the site. Thus, the site clearly can accommodate present and projected uses. Bite Characteristics: The zito shall have high visibility. } Response: ,, The s,: ' is is located at the intersection of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. Nimbus Avenue. The �etiw�idg the development on the property is orientad entirely o r intersection, giving it high, visibility. The co'mnercial nature of the site is highlighted by the Burger King restaurant, which is located closest to the intersection. Impact Assessment: The scale of thna pxta j ect shall be compatible with the surrounding uses. Response: This application does not involve any change to the scale of the project, which is already developed. In addition', _ zoning �: (maximum �e a otent�,ialverage, the site sits andntheandnlarkinnstrretrs, t ...lot , coverage, minimum land ca parking), g, p on the .�^operty. The existing substantial additional development o development consists of two single-sto structures. The scale Hof the development is compatibl with the l e -space buildings in the adjoining I--P zoned area. The deveopment is also consistent p the south, with the relatively dea,!se ressdentia]. develo�o�►o cf the residential t�evelo meat by is shielded from although, the subject property res p y tha Fanno Creek greenway and a landscaped buffer. Impact Assessment: site c configuration and characteristics shall besuchthat the privacy of adjacent non- commercial uses can be maintained. Re aonse: As discussed above, the existing development is nted entirely toward the intersection of S.W'. Scholls Per or.�+�- at�.o Road and S.W. Nimbus Avenue. There are no adjacent non- 3 f cc commercial uses. The residential area located to the south is shielded and separated from the subject _ property by the Fanno Creek greenwa and a landscaped buffer . hpaCt use asmelt: It shall be possible) to incorporate the unique site features into the site design and development plan Response: Applicant is not aware of any unique site features. Moreover, the site is already fully developed. Inpact Aese,erOnt: The associated lights. noise and activiti es shal l not interfere with ad Joining so n - residential'use3. Response: The orientation of the existing development toward the intersection away from the adjoining flex space developm ent will prevent any i nterference with ad j oinin g non-residential uses. The 1,Economy" element of the Comprehensive Plan sets forth Policies applicable to this proposal. In particular, change toCr Gd i sr�P will help to diversify conomIc � poxtun rtresnd provide jobs bolicy g.1.1 D by Providing a zonndesignation that will allow more complete utilization of the existing development on the property... The current zoning designation is Preventing the applicant from leasing existing space to retail commercial tenants who are best suited to the location. a consequence, much of the Nimbus Center space has been for an extended p eriod, and contributes nothing to the local economy. P The proposal existing development and does not encroach on residential areas (Policy 5.1.4). Because the property is already developed, the applicant has already satisfied requirements for transportation p _ n and parking � (Policy 8.1.3). As discussed above, the Site has direct access to S.W. Scholls Ferry Road, an arterial street, as required b7 the Comprehensive Plan's criteria for the C -G district. Affect on health, safety and welfare of t ht community (2) Y Proposed . . The subject property is fully built out. Thus, the . .. will be to allow the map amendment will not alter theephysical developmenvt of the a wider property Y the , The .only onl effect ect o t ti L,he e P . of commercial uses existing development y ®• within vasiet There is no reason to believe that the change will have any impact n y adverse +ion act ou the health, safet and welfare cif• t e communty gsol oC 0 • I• e. 4 t • • �fl an and. -2q�o,,,,�eher1s ve �T�..o,., 4�, ral anMPe ° The City. °s comprehensive plan and ordinances have been acknowledged by LCDC; therefore, the statewide Planning goals are not approval standards for this application. C. t M lice a .imtalana tin car • once' Chapter 18:62 of the Community Development Code establishes the p the C -G zoning district. he development for • opmtent standards for existing develo meat conforms with the deal the C•-G district. The zone change therefore would not result in nonconforming development • • • • Average ( 1 ) g s 50 feet. minimum lot width exceed. (2) The property does not abut a residential district Therefore, there are no required estbacks (3) Height of the buildings does not exceed 45 feet. (4) The site satisfies both the maximum coverags limitation of 85% and the minim am landscaping requirement of 15%. Additional development requirements are imposed elsewhere in the code • However, these requirements (e.g., landscaping and screening; off-street parkin; and loading) would not differ between the I -P district and the C-G district. Thus, the zone change does not affect whether the development is consistent with these standards. With respect to parking requirements, applicant notes that staff has indicated that the existing parking (approximately 95 spaces) excreds the adinimum parking required by Chapter 18.106. D . j ,ence of , change the ghborho r cornmu el �, tA.ke or o in t, a com e e h s v _an or z�� `n ma as it +�1 tP ' floe oro e t , w s e subject of therm. 3pplat.'' o The subject development was developed at a high visibility intersection, and is oriented toward that intersection,, rather than toward the adjoining -' • pment. 'lhel high w develo visibility of the ub. subject pproperty' makes it. more, suitable for zoning. , g , � _ although the com�aerci��l. development n In addition, aluho General Commercial wi' p c onthe property may have appeared econom caa.lyr viable within - of development, the zoning noy� thin the. I. P zone; at t'�Ye time appears to be an impediment , • alit of the �ment to leasing- More than h spa we in the 22,500 square foot building is presently vacant. / /1 >1� TIGARD 'LAMMiMING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Minutes - August 22, 1994 • CALL TO ORDER : President Eyre called the meeting to order at 7 :30 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center Town Nall 13125 SW Mall Boulevard. . ROLL CALL Present:' President Eyre, Conn ssa avers DeFrat Holland, Moore, Saporta and Wilson Absent: Commissioners Collson, Saxton and Schweitz Staff Present: Will D'Andrea and Mark Roberts, Assistant Planners and Leslee Gemrill, Planning Comnmission:SecretarX 2 4OVE MINUTES Conuatis44ioner Moore motioned to approve the June 20, 1994 meeting minutes as submitted and Commissioner Saporta seconded the motion. A voice vote Was taken and the motion was approved unan mcus llr Commissioner Holland motioned Jnl y 18, 1994 meeting minutes Sa p orta se conded th e motion. motion was approved unanim abstained. to approve the miAutes of the as submitted and Commissioner A voice vote was taken and the ously. Commis ic3:ler De rang Com aissioner Saporta motioned to and approve the August $, 1994 w work session minutes as su ' President Tyre seconded the motion. . voice votz was taken and the motion was approved ananimousl �, c Commissicners Holland, Moore and W.i.lson abstained. PL&NNING COMMISSION IONN COMM/CATIONS None 5 PUBLIC REARING 5.1 SITE DEVELOPMENT NEVXEW SDR 94 -0005 vIQS /BANK ®F' AXERICA L ATIAN 9575 SW Locust Avenue (�+1CTM 151 26EDC, t.X lots '4700 And. • ia tnid o 4701).. An appeal, Of: a D ir: e4 c to� t ' s � DF� c is ion e app• rdovLng a 5 u it motel with monin 7 bx ea kfast service. Specii ally 1 and 2 rela in gto d Ara. ht csr has ded .ca a� . street improvements APPLICABLE 1'PPR0'12 L CRITERIA. • Com u�t .,,y Deve:iolc�ment Code Chapters 18.32 ; 08.64 r 18 a.564',184104 .i8.1O2, �' Boni nd 18 64. Zone C P 18 � 14, 18.120/ �.a 1SQ, � - Profession l Conine' : ) 1. g -tra.ct permits a rcial the .. r dl�.s an.ge of ro f : � i ices. The zone all ws der � .... ✓ p al and Bona. ser-� ransient lod in a re0 tins: eso�.on t _gy_ g � � s nab � � aunt :fa�.z�laa�.e • eL' Mark Roberts, Assistant Planner, Informed the Planning Commissioners that on June 17, 1994, staff recommended, approval for a 56 room motel ' at the vacant property at Locust Avenue and Greenburg Road. In the decision. Conditions of Approval # 1 and # 2 r the and pp � ' equ�.redl �.,e a�ppla.caDt to dedicate improve the sites frontage aionq SST Greensburg Road to the ultimate right -of -way width of 49 feet. On June 27, 1994, the applicant appealed the conditions of approval stating they were not warranted due to the minimal pro7ected impact of the motel given the current J els of service on that portion of g applicant's traffic report Gxeenbur Ro�►d. Be $e use a to ,ted to�ca .......less traffic indicated that mote], xp generate d during ng peak periods than Professional-office use, the primary use permitted for this site. Assistant Planner Roberts continued and iaaformed the Commissioners that the City attorney recommended the Planning Commission uphold thv applicants ap,eal and staff recommended that Conditions of, Approval be. ;revised to require the applicant amend the site and landscape plan to indicate the ultimate right -of-way. width but not actually construct or dedicate the improvements. The Attorney further recommender that Condition of Approval #2 be revised and the applicant be 14 a uired p °� g to sign a waiver of reYuonstrance again:zt the future... formation of a Local Improvement District to improve SW Greenburg Road to the ultimate street width. Y Assistant Planner Roberts said staff recommended the proposed changes to the staff decision issued ' for the Phoenix Inn Motel. APPLICANTS PRESENTATION r Steven V. Johnson P 0 Box 2508, Salem, OR representing R 9730E :. VIPS Industries, Inca addressed the Planning Commissioners. He stated he really had nothi.' - to add but did talk bs °i of ly about Washington County's review of the application. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Coramissioner Rolland motioned to uphold the applicants' 'appeal, in accordance to the recommended changes and Commissioner Saporta seconded the motion.' A voice vote was taken and the motion was passed unanimouWly. 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 94'0O03/0N ' 94 -0005 REMROLD TRUST, INC. LOCATION 10075 SW CaScade Boulevard (WC L'M 151 35B21 tax lots 300 and 500) To amend the Comp::ehensi've Plan Map I _ I to General Cc mmerCic . and a zoning Ma prom Light P (Industrial Park) to C G General Commercial.). change from �PP I CRITERIA � �y y, �. }y oP p Code s t"LiJ REVIEW .,:.. .:. :..,.. 18.62; Comprehensive C4�iW! ►uairYty. LS'Prve�\ Iii �'ei15t� e 18.32. 15.62 Plan Policies C�ABT,+E Chapters 1.22, 2 4, 5, 7, 8 and 12. Zone: I -P (industrial Park) the I.:p PLANNXNG col I SI0 i' HtETIUG XINNUTES ug tit 22, 1994 ?ago 2 R " 1- zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, h,t�es; professional and administrative services, financial, insurance and real ' estate services, business support services, znanui acti ring of finished Products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage and .distribution av ona other uses. The C -G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate serViGes, • business support services, and eating and drinking establi s h a nt s among other uses. _ Assistant Planner, Will D'Andrea presented to the Planning snitZS s 3 n , the staff report. Be informed the Commissioners that the subject site was located on the west side of SW Cascade Boulevard between SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW Greeni.:erg Road and the adjacent properties to the north, east, west and, south were zoned I-P. The subeec site and the majority ity of. the Cascade Boulevard area was annexed into the City in 1,1ne 1981. At that time, the zone was changed from Washington County 14-1 (?'ndustrial -to Tigad M -4 (Industrial Park) and no other land use applications had been filed with the City. Be highlighted for those present the established retail /commercial businesses in the immediate area and indicated the remaining sites were developed with industrial type uses or were vacant. Assistant Planner D "Andrea said two separate ownerships comprised the site. Will D'Andrea informed the Commissioners that the applicant's possible uses for this site included construction of a Smtith's Home Furnishings store and a second specialty retail `_building each containing 60,000 'square feet. Be said the applicant had presented evidence of a change or mistake that justified a zone change on this parcel and he summarized for the Commissioners, the evidence. In conclusion, Assistant Planner D'Andrea e a said that staff recognized some changes had occurred but whether the changes were significant enough g to justify the change from Industrial to General Commercial was questionable particularly given some of the staff concerns about the future of : the Cascade area. He said the issue before the Planning Commission was whether or not the area along Cascade Boulevard should be Industrial or Commercial and if the proposed change was made, it should be made with the notion that the entire arca be com arc ial . Be said that while there justification ! <. e �- e vas some for the e, the • to giere more g Planning Division, found it da.��a� ".ult than a ii..ited e,' he plan ~�' endorsement for P.PprdvalY for reasons includi.s��� the ever - �� question PP , p . ... , traffic. Oregon De" art 'pent of Trams .. ortation concern rn about a Land use, and the i� P p PtA +1xii.I IG co 'uc SSioN NEt1TING HINOT S ;°' August 22, 1994 Page • �Vc, fY q 0 h js o 0 J APPLICAiTS,PRESATION' ,a ,"Michael C . Robinsoi:,, .'� Attorney . at haw 9 0 0 Fifth Avenue, i $u :te 2''300,' Portl�atind, OR'. X97:204, � using � a ,amap and aerial photograph, highlighted for .the Planning Ca aa.�., sion, the' location and 'busiiaeseea of ; the ;proposed cc?a►prehensive plan, amendment /zone change. He ., outlines brief ly the applicant. s ..'disagreement with staff ressarding whether ©r° net.. to .take Action on a single parr; el or the ` entire; zone. and provided, details. of .justi.fication that changes indicated the demand for the area wau for retail arid. not .ndustrial use. Ee referred to Chris Johnson, .a real arid., agent's ' op ..lion that the market demand 'in , ° the area called; for retail u'ie,. Mr. Rob;' ison outlined' the criteria used and pr wided argument,. that he said justified, evidenco of change ' in the neighborhood or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan/ zoning map as it related to the subject property. Mr. Robinson briefly telked about . traffic , issues and Oregon Department of ` Transportation'` s comments . he said were without dy. He Kittelson & • that the �C be��ef benefit of the traffic stu a referred to th Asteociates traffic study compared both zonings that confirmed, the po tential traffic imp act of d evelopment under either zoning would be similar. indicated because of the In c g, 1. n use, employment and tra`is ` ortation char' es in . the = Robinson i • zoning, i g j d for this area, and. area, I • . �. �r P' zo,�xng was no longer ust�.fle ' t. Commission recommend! approval of the plan map/zoning Pa na. to the City ' Council i Mr. Robinson then g �q P ' � ibut ::era a letter addressed to the Planniru�� Commission dAStr dated lgi 19,94. The letter was from. Kittelson & �u tit 22, Associates, ?nc. regarding the applicant's response to COOT -, Region 'One's comments on CPA 94- 0003 /ZON 94 -0005 Rembold Trust, Inc. . Con issionOr Saporta asked the K ttelsca representative to address the Planning Commission rega.mding t.:G traffic. issues mark hey, Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineer Associate, Kittel on & Associates Inc. , 610 SW Alder, Suite r 97205 suamuatized ODOT "s cutstan .ineg concerns ?00, ',� ®z-�tlans�, OR 972. as oath nod in the August 22, 1994 document om�.re firth, g Prc "scat No, 1235.00 distributed earlier to . tl� g, g 'PUBLIC REARING CLOSED C"oit.ssioner Saporta stated ne understood the arguments for a hange of oircumstan..e arid 'mistake but was bothered by the fact that a C -0 island would bo created PLANNING •�. •gyp �•1M �y �q�t � COMMISSION �iJ;,�+L�N�I�' �.��i�PiwriiiS "" August J22 j�� .�, p��� ..e' �'•����: RYA _ Y_ , •4 •� ,1 •a • Commissioner Holland spent -i.onned there were retail otit.:letas rain the I -P taka ng it a -G already . r � 'ones Wilsozz indicated the area `was in trap its. ®n and Cona.sss. .,, s; �'E: est. did not want to hold hp the a�apli ca nt_., qu The' ComMiSsiosxers briefly 'discussed the' Cascade Boulevard) area and the proposed co nprehensive and pane change. Cosam� ' .ssioner Moore 'motioned o approve ter ,r.' Cosz►prehonsive. Plan amendment from Light hnc ustrial 't0 General CosmnereLA1 and a • l Park) , to CMG ,General zoning chaps• from I -P ( a; C o merc ial) 'Commissioner, 8 second ed the: mc�o `' vo ice vote ' was taken and the motion Was approved unanimously, 5.3 c RE HENSIVE PLAN ENDI T CPA 94- 0004/ZON :94 -i?DA6 i�I2+S8US Avenue (WCTM 1S1 34.AA, tax CUTER' LOCATION:. ,,10115,_ SW Nasab1ts of SW lot 1900). The site is located apt the southwest st 'corner Amend:, the • Scholls Ferry Road and Sid t'�aambus .end Zoning. , v i- Comprehensi .�e pl n Map frosrt Light Industr al ( ) Dist±ict Map from Industra.al Park (I P ) to a Genera. C oumescsal Comprehensive Flan ' Hap and toning. ,designatiom (C ) . APPLICABLE iPPROV At CRITERIA '':Comprehensive a ta oiscies 1, 2 4 , 5 , 8 and 12 ; Comaunity, Development Code �' - 3E The current zone Chapters �.�. � 1� 3� and �� >8.62 A Z Industrial Park saermits • a tango, of .li ht industre l Uses within an industrial park. Light .ndiustsiai also p p Li ht �,, . � � � � g � � p ed 'for a rats o of tq 20% ' of a devel,� sent ,complex. to Lie us commetircia..l ,uses she. C -G zoning designation a lacil tilic agency 4►nd, administi ative secs i s, public professional and administrative se <rvices, financial, insurance su . por° and real estate p ss ' 'eating ng services an tat stabl establishments among other 4ses . and dr�r��.a�g ., rk Roberts, ,Assistant Planner, stated this appiicatioza was similar to item 5.2 on the agenda.' Be said the subject site was. h ?t . 43 � sores ill site and ccated on c tf hie t southwest d . corner ee�K r r o ` .of echo is Perry' Road and v nue the Business The site .was,' as n le parcel deve la p ed 'with � rid str 1. office space b �lding � rger restaurin o The aplicant, s Fr:�'Y reas © lar teguestnl +g this 16.nd -i0e nendnent .way because Cee real uses f g permitted ur.� �e the planned ndustrial tena�ats which weaz'e designation that had limited[ the range o ic1 were Permitted, e : sub j ect to erati.tt�d to lease suites at the �.te. the . ut was hi hly wrisible t .raveling _ __ _ o sncatox`�.sts and �►sdestr�azas SW 5cholls Fero Road. Ass stat Pla�re r Roberts sand i. n em as s a G o , a :a on design, the' ,,,site resent .�unc tiozYed appeared to draw mach of its customer base from passaxg aahiad d f • PLANNING C014INSION MECI.NG X3 N o' S ugUst 22„ 9 ag 051, v 4 '.) sr e .contor Wasn't C.-,G in. Commissioner Saporta mentioned the center was Indeed separate and essentially functioned and looked like it was Commissioner Wilson motioned to approve th request for approval of Comprehensive Plan JImendment 94-0004 and Zone Change 94-0006. Commissioner Saporta seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and the motion was approved unanimously. • OTTIER BUSINESS None • ADJOUTANI4ElgvJU The meeting a.djotarned at 8:25 p.m. Lesftlee‘Gentsztil.. Planning Comvil,t)s,:i.cor). Seretai ATTEST: President COMMISSION MEETING NXNUTS August 22, 19 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING CONIUSSXON AGENDA ITEM August 22, 1994 TIGARD CITY HALL TCWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON FACTS Gen rl Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 94 -0004 Zone Change ZON 94-0006 REQUE ST: A request for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from ., o C -G (General Commercial) and a Zone Z L (L�,srrt' �.n..ustrial) to Change request from I -P (Industrial Park) to C -G (General Commercial) . APPLICANT: Nimbus Center Associates 811 NW 19th, Suite 102 Portland, OR 97209 OWNERS: same REPRESENTATIVE: Richard Allen Ball, Janiox and Novack One Main Place w A Main Street, Suite 1100 Portland, 'OR 97204 -3274 5 Nimbus 3 is LOCATION: loll ,rs ,�venuo (�c�I 151 34AA, tax lot 1900) Th... site located at the south vest corner of SW Scholls Ferry Road and. SW Nimbus Avenue within the K011 Business Center. Vic it Information The subject site is 2•43 acres in size and is located on the southwest Road and Nir►u9� Avenue ,within the Roll Business of SW Scholls Avenue is a local street serving. the Rol1 Business T Center. SW Nimbus Avenue street .. corner • Y adjoining Creek Center which consists Ferry Road west o the 217 State Hghway Fanrio Creek south of SW Sr�.ol �, Road ry ++ Areas to the north of SW e ss Ce_.ter to the West borders Ferry i City .r and are developed with the entire burin S�ho71s Fer Road. are within the Cit of Beave ton east a al and business park uses Properties to the ear mixture of commercial and, south are zoned Planned Industrial and are a part of the Roll Business Center Baclicar Informs :ion m The first phase of the Roll B Usiness Center consisted of four ',).industrial buildings coustrusted in 1979. In :1.984, Set sitiv within Permit 5- UI tenant approved r ved to allow reconstruction of Na mbuS a portion he 100-y Plaid, in return! other areas were excavated to � i of t 84 w� a �0 year flood flood plain e�.euation: rteconetxuct��ari, ot the road maintain the existing flc� P permitted further development of the Hole. Business Center. The subject property was 'developed in 1986. STAFF REPORT - CP A "94-0004 0 ASS PRASE 1 ooiates �. /ZO►I� 94.E -0006" - i�T�.tn'ous' Cent • 5�, Tnfortai�ion�a,.Si Prox�osa ' Des tp ion The site is a single parcel within the Koll Business Center which was developrad with in line tenant suites and a Burger Xing Restaurant. The property owner has proposed to redesignate the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District Map from its enrrent Light industrial: and planned Industrial Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning District Map designations to General Commercial. Under the sites cur;rent Planned Industrial zoning of basic retail uses are allowed. designation a li��a.ted number gn The applicant has requested tketa land use amendment because the limited number of commercial uses permitted under the Planned Industrial Designation has limited the range of tenants which are permitted to lease suites at the site. The subject property. is highly visible to motorists and pedestrians traveling en SW Scholia Ferry Road. The applicant states that due to the site's visibility has historically drawn many . center of its ?te s visibilxt .the cents rather than primarily from customers stomers from the area at ler . industrial tenants within the Koll Business Canter. • PgencvComtnex t The E ngineering Division has reviewed the Pro o nal and provided the following comments: The applicants have submitted a statement in support of their request for the map amendment and rezone that indicates the traffic generated by the change in uses allowed under the general commercial zone will not be greater that those allowed by the industrial zone. in the statement, they note that the existing parking spaces in the center exceed the number required by the proposed zone change. The existing site :take access from SW Nimbus Avenue from a driveway suff • distance with • ion of Scholis Fer 9' sufficient distance from the. intersect SW Road adttu a conflicts with the traffic at the signalized intersection of SW Scholia Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue. Since no new construction is IproPosed, we concur that any change to the traffic impacts of the pr ject will be minimal. Iri addition, no substantial impacts are likely on the City utility systems. Therefore, we have no objections to the proposed zone Change- City' of Tigard Buil ding Division, General , Tele p hone and Electri Portland General Electric, City of Beaverton, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, "lave ' PP • s or objections. reviewed the a lcaton, and have offered no com�lentd o_ obj No other comments have been received. . FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant approval criteria in this case are Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.2, 2.1.1, 5.1.4,'8.1. , and 12.2.2 and Community Development Code Sections 18.22, 18.32 and 18.62. Section 18,22.040 sets forth the standards and procedures for amendments to the Zoning Map which have been reviewed as follows: A recomelendation or a decision to approve, approve with Conditio a or to deny pP to n3rra amend nt thall be based on all of the for �s quasi-Judicial STAP F RBPCJRT CP.t 54 O004/Zt7 ?1 94�'0016 -; Nimbus Center AsOAciates FA01 Y gy_ I'. • ( s y The applicably►, comprehensive plan poh ciies and map designation and; the change will nett adversely, affect the health,' safety and welfare of the ceamauYi ty f The following are the applicable'' Comprehensive Plan..Pol.icier related to this request and how the application addresses each criteria is reviewed following each pclicy; Plan, Policy 1.1.2 requiraes, that is order to approve a quasi-judicial ' amendment to the Plan, .thr ( , ity must find that the chasten is consistent with applicable plarh policies, that a change Of physical circumstances has occurred oince ties tar=ti,ginal ,designation,, or there is evidence. °: of a change in the nei gNeecheed or community vtieb affects the subject parcels. Alternat ,vely, the City must find that a mistake was made in the original designation; Along with &tvelopment of the 1Co11 Business Center, the larger Tigard and Beaverton Area has experienced significant growth. The remaining properties within the Nimbus Center have been developed since 1979 with a mixture of light industrial uses. Due to its location the subject property will can:,inue to Serve customers from a wider area than the Kol.;l Business Center. By permitting the site to be rezoned, a greater range of commercial uses and services would be permitted. These services are expected to be used by both citizens of the area at large and 'tenants of the Koll Business Center. The ,primary reasons for this amendment most directly relate to physical growth of the greater area the physical location of the site and the design of the site improvements which were approved at t'lis Commercial site terms of design, the site functions as a Genera]., o + �e presently. Plan Policy 2.1 .1 states that the City shell maintain on ongoing citizen inv'olvement Program and shall assure that citisen ► will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phatio s of the planning process,, The app3.icant provided notice: of axle conducted a meeting for int erQ =yed property ($wrners within a 250 foot radius of the affected property. The CST representative for this area was also notified of the neighborhood meeting. ]Notice is ~ being provided of the Planning Commission and City Council Public Hearing,, for this proposal. Plana Policy 5.1.4 states that the, City shall amore that new commercial and industrial development shall not encroach into rest" riential areas that designated commercial uses. This policy is satisfied bee use the subj ct property is not, p resentl y zoned for residential use. Plan Plan Policy 8.1.1 states that the City shall plan for a safe and efficient street wd roadway sy,a r ,em that meet* current needs and anticipated : future growth and devs.�o msnt,, This policy ryis satisfied becaus this property has frontage SW Scholia Per" Road (State p Tigard rk on S Highway 210) designated an Arterial Street on the City of Tiga, Comprehensive Transportation Plan Map. The as existing roadwa YP pattern expecttl to accommodate the minor increase in traffic volume re salting from an approval of a zone g ,- approval e shah a on this site. P'iicy 12.2.2 provides the ll oCtional critotia fear General commercial zoning. The a pp1icabie l eeeeional criteria s eci ied Chapter 12 of he Comprehensive rehensive Plan are the toliewingy t spacing and locatioaal criteria require. that the coms:l+rcial ' area shall Act he Surrounded by residential districts on mote thaw. two t ci,ates STAOP RFPDAT CPA 94 0;004/tPN 0005 - T,i.tttbus Cen er Assso PAGE 3 4 sides. This site is within a ' heavily developed light' industrial ;. area. The site is buffered from existing residential uses to the west by Fanno Creek. The scale of the pro j sct shall be compatiblo with the surrounding uses. The site was developed with an linear brick single story building with leaseable caites A single story brick Burger Icing restaurant was also devee1oped towards the street corner of the property. Through the site development process this structure was found to be compatible with the design,' of adjoining existing and planned development within the area. No revisions to the site are anticipated as a result of this amendment. Any future changes will also be reviewed for compatibility' surrounding,uPess. P 1r site access criteria require: 1) the Proposed area shall not create traffic congestion or traffic safety problems; 2) the ' mite , shall have direct aeceats from a major collector or arterial street; and 3) public transportation shell, be available to the site. The approval of this applicetion is not expected to result in 'traffic congestion or traffic safety problems. The existing commercial center is used for a limited range General Commercial type uses presently. An increase in traffic volumes due to expanded commercial services is expected but at the time the site was developed all street improvements serving the site were developed in anticipation of all site improvements within the center baing leased for :commercial uses which generate similar traffic' impacts. Allowing a wider range of commercial uses ie not expected to create traffic congestion problems in this area. Di,:.ect site access is presently provided to SW Nimbus Avenue. No new driveway access is proposed with this application. Transit service is available to the site from SW SchollS Ferry Road. Locational criteria also requires that the site be of a sire which can accommodate projected uses and that the site possess high visibility. This criterion is satisfied for the 2.43 acre site. The existing site improvements accommodate a variety of uses permitted within the General Commercial Zoning District. This site is also highly visible from adjoining roadways. impact Assessment i,s determined by addressing the following criteria: 1) the Scale of the project shall be compatible with the surrounding uses; 2) the sits Configurations 'Shall be such that the privacy of ad j scent non- commercial uses Stan be maintained; 3) it shall be possible to incorporate unique site features into the site design sand development plant and 4) the associated lights, noire and activities shall not interfere with ;adjoining anon- commmercial uwss. This policy is satisfied because the impact to surrounding land uses is expected to be negligible. The Scale of the present developmez:t on this Site was previously determined to be compatible with the surrounding uses. Future modifications to the site improvements will for compatibility with adjoining land uses, wall also be reviewed Judic3.al�I�lara Ames forth procedural a18r32u090 (D) and .review of Quasi- r is fo 13idtite SubsP i i0 edt n �� � ;; � d C��. Thi forth the Section � Amendments. s review r. „. tx�rement5 fob quasi +7ndici.al Plan a. . i-. P� P sed amendments and qu ` salon revi.��r ro 0 re ireai that the planning Comm Council. � . . Provide been rocessed in accr. , , ,,fiance ,with. the re ireme..nts of y rovide a recommendation for actin to the City Co' 1. .-he application p f the Comment Develoyment Code. STAB "P REPOT - CgA 94. 0150 : /BON 94 0006 - imbias Center .Atli oeiatetr PACE 4 OAL I--- J • Section 18.62 sets', fortis the development standards for property within. the General Commercial 'zoning. District. The subject site meets these re qu irererts because p r average width greater .f . The existin g structures do not e ceed 45 feet in height. The site coverage is less than 8S percent and the landscaped area is greater than 1S,,'percent, The existing uses on the site are permitted uses within the proposed General Commercial Zoning' beaignation. • °he statewide planning goals 'adopted under Oregon Revised Statues Chapter ,157, until acknowledgement of the Comprehensive .plan and ordinances; The Comprehensive Plan has'1oeen acknowledged. Each amendment to the plan is provided to ,;the appropriate State Agencies for review. Notice Of filing of this application has been provided to the State Department of ,Land Conservation and Development for :comment more than 45 Jaya, prior to the final hearing on this application as required Under State of Oregon Administrative Rule 660•^18 -020. If approved by the City Council, Notice of Adoption will;,. also be provided to the ' Department of Ljnad ' Conservation and Development. . The applicable standards of soy provisiosa of this code or other applicable implemantiug ordinance; Section 18.62 of the Community Development Code sets , forth the d The subj subject site r\ ; for the General �.ommercial Zoning District.' evelo meat ttsitern eets these requirements because the lot width average it greater than 50 feet. The existing structures do not exceed 45 feet in height. The site coverage with imprevious surfaces is less than 85 percent and the landscaped area is greater than 'li► percent. The existing uses on the site are permitted in the General , Commercial Zoning District. . Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community' or mistake or inconsistency in the ccnprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application; Along with the Koll Business Center tihe lamer Tigard and Beaverton Area has experienced significant growth. Due to its location the subject property will continue to serve customers from a :wider area than primarily the tenants in the 'Koll Business Center. The primary reasons for this amendment relate to phy$cal' growth of the greater area, ' the physical location of the site and the design Of the site improvements which were approved at this location. By permitting the site to be rezoned a greater range of commercial uses and �. would permitted. '�h services are expected to be ices, would be wrmui.tted y of th,, tees and tenants of the Koll used b both, citizens �e area cite. s o a at large Business Center. Additional space which is leased within the center, may create additional emplo'ment opportunities for area residents. The Planned Industrial zone allows upl to 20 percent of 'a development complex to be utilized with limited commercial uses. There is ctoncern that approval of change to the land use designation may lead to redevelopment of industrial sites within the Kol Business Center for commercial use, Rowever, it is not expected that the Koll Business Center will redevelop with additiona1 commercial . development due to the recently developed nature of industrial use within the center. Future applications for development or redevelopment will be reviewed for consistency with the development standards of the Planned Industrial Zone which limiter the total of. square footage which can be developed for comtnerd al use. In terms of design the site functions presently as a General Commercial site so that a mistake can be said to have been made in limiting the rAng ,the 'commercial Uses permitted on the site to STAFF RE; . , , F ®RT -CPA 94- O0U4/�`�"S� 84-40�15 - Nimbus Center .Associates ' ��'1�i.G�� I PARED ,P1!7I AseidtP.nr•Oldrlier Dick Bewers" Senior Planner STAFF REPORT - CPA 94-0004/ ON 94-0006 - 4114, 41501474l'I-6.. 140.111m: :57 5.. ..`6 11111111NNIim MI Is 4811 0, it ili 41i11111 ill *J1 I* .... V 44 ' MN f a tini g iti MI IS? li _Tri iii11011 •, NO • onniti, '41 Wm =I"' ' ' ohm Elm arlt V 41 Hirt 41. NI r Ind'? — Bair • 12--isaw Rir inur = an elor 111111111111 LU an Statement in Support of Application for Quasi - Judicial., Ccmprehenssive Plan Map Amendment and, Zone CY.,.ange I. 3ntroduct.. T ri This '.•,pplication is for a quasi - Judicial eomt)rehefeive Plan Thep : amendment from Light InduStriai (I -L) to General Commercial (C-C) and a zoning nap amendment from industrial Park (I -P) to General Commercial (C-G) for the Nimbus Center. The subject property is located at the intersection of S.W. Scholis Ferry Avenue, with access onto both streets. The prop y W property fully with a freestanding restaurant (Burger King) and a commercial center of approximately 22,500 rentable square feet. The property does not share its street access with any surrounding property. The property includes a landscaped parking area, with approximately 95 Parking spaces. ti The a iicant has no current Plans for any additional PP P develo vent on the , subject ,ty' if the propert_ y is rezoned. P • sect proper g g density . .4 Intl�eal, p s�. n�.f�.c��nt changes in the �iens��.t of the potential for tK y size and shape of property iss limited b the sip the site and the ha licable code requirements for lot coverage, Pp 9 a:.. landscaping, and parking. W i Under the current I -P zoning, the permissible range of commercial ., ..� uses is limited, and a maxa.num of 20% of the p P y ( ) convenience sales and . .'' devoted to l conv�na. development complex ar►-a cbc d��roits day care; (3) eating and drinking establishments •h i4 Personal services facilities; and (5) general retail sales. The applicant is seeking the change to the C-'G designation so that the subject Property can be leased • + • • .. , . I without the 20% limitation. Development for a full range of commercial uses, �ra.thou . p�aent a.n the.. adjoining �'_p district" 'w;�la.ch includes mars thousands of of cflees p c c e, does not currently u �hfu feet and given : its lack of visibility, is unlikely ever to do sso. Moreover, there is no den ° ger that additional areas in the adjoining I -P district would be converted to General Commercial zonin • the subject ProPerty is,uni, el situated, based on its location and visibility• The .. o would +... y locational adjoining I P zoned property not satassf, the reeirements for the. C-G district. 0 Lit 11. A,Qprovai . Standards Section 18..22 040 of the Tigard communitY Development Code sets the standards for quasi - judicial map amendments. The standards which must be addressed are: A. T e a 4. 1 cable coiu.re ensive • .an oli.c:a es a; .; ,m: c�c .esa.cation, and � t _`e a , w`' o a verse c the . health safet .. a d . welfare of t e oitii n `t 1) Applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designation The Comprehensive Plan establishes the following description of the General Commercial zone: "General Commercial areas are intended to provide for major retail goods and services. The uses classified as general commercial may involve drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale and repair services or provide services to the traveling public. The uses range from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, drive -in restaurants to laundry establishments. It is intended that these uses be adjacent to an arterial or Major collector street." Response: Current uses on the property include the restaurant, a furniture store, a dental office, a travel shop, a dry cleaning service, and a copying service. However, more than half of the space in the commercial building (i.e., excluding the p g restaurant) currently frC�s� � restaurant is C:1xa► anti vacant. General Commercial . freestanding zoning will allow this property to compete on an even footing with other high-visibility peoperties, because it will be possible to lease to prospective tenants without the limitations inherent in the current I -P zoning. The Comprehensive Plan establishes the following locational criteria for the General Commercial zone: Spacing a location: The Gomm rcial area is not surrounded by r sidentia1 districts on more than two sides. Response: The subject property does not abut any residentially ' »' zoned. property. 'T� <�?re is a residential area to the south of the subject property; however, the Nimbus Center is on separated pa subject sed from P that residential area by a landscaped bf ject property and by a greenway through which Fenno Creek runs ,. , proposed xp o existing _ � '� of an east area ga al]. not create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. Such a determination► shall be based on str set oapaaity, existing and Projected traffic volumes, the speed limit, nUmber of turning movements' and the traffic generating characteristics of the various tYPes of uses. Response: The proposed change Will not alter the existing development Although the range of permitted commercial ial 'uses will be expanded � generation or the creation of traff easo s i - nif icant change in trip genera o g n to c�.. t the change, there is no r g congestion or traffic safety Problems. Access: : The site sash =11 have direct access from a iaajor collector or arterial s3tre M t. Response: The site has - existing direct access from S.W.. Scholls Ferry Road, which is designated as an arterial Access Public transposrtstion shall be available to the site or general area. P line serves S.W. Scholls Ferry Res ®nse o The Try. NTet No. Road in the in e vicinity of the site. �.xsumes�a�at Site Characteristics: Th site shall be of a sisal 'which can accommodate present and pro j sated uses. Response: The site is already fully developed, and includes adequate parking for full commercial use of the site. Thus, the site clearly can accommodate present and projected uses. Bite Characteristics: The site shall have high visibility. Response: The site, is located at the intersection of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. Nimbus Avenue. The existing development on the property is oriented entirely toward the intersection, giving it high visibility. The commercial 'nature of , the site is highlighted by the Burger King restaurant, which is located closest to the intersection. 4 ! Iznpact Assessment: The scale of the pro3ect shall be compatible with the surrounding uses. Response: . change to the This application does not involve any r p pp y scale site of the project, , which is already develo p ed. In addition, the site size an th4 zoning constraints (maximum lot coverage, • p,. g, ,� parking), g) , p • substantial additional development on the property. potential for minimum landsca in and arka;aa� retract the. of �,} �e 9+ • - additional ys The p�i�ting, development consists of p single-story t of the develoment is mncoatiblewiththestructures. flexsrae buildings in the adjoining I-F zoned area. The development is also Consistent at . + y development . . . o the south, with the relativel dense residential t although the subject property is shielded front view of the an residential de 7elopment by the Fanny. Creek greenway and a landscaped buffer. Impact configuration and characteristics shall be such that the privacy of adjacent non -co ercial used can be mmaintaild. Response: As discussed above, the existing development is oriented entirely toward the intersection of S.W. .Scholls Ferri Road and S•W Nimbus Avenue. There are no ad;jscent, nen- 3 • commercial uses- The residential area located to the south is shielded and separated from the subject property by, the Fanno Creek greenway . , :and a landscaped buffer'. Impact Assessment: It shell be possible to inserporate the uaise site features ihto the site design and development plan Response: App`1icent is not aware of any`" unique site features. Moreover, the site is already fully developed. I act Asses ent: The associated lights, noise and activities shall not interfere with ad joining non- reeid : ! tia1 use Response: They orientation of the existing development toward the intersection and away from the adjoining flex space development will prevent any interference with adjoining mail- residential uses, The "Economy" element of the Compre a.ensive Plan sets forth Policies applicable iS proposal. In par " �, Change Particular', the c to this ro ©sal a t° pp to (- G district will help to diversify economic. o ox.tunities and provide jobs (Policy 5-1.1) by providing a zoning .designation that will allow noire coinple n of the. existing The current zonin des .nation is to t�ta. d.ev�:iopment on the Property. The , � �' g' p'eventing the applicant from leasing existin ,space to retail commercial tenants who are best suited to the location. As a consequence, muiof the us center space has been vacant for or an ex ten d ed eri oda ndaon contributes nothing to the Ioc al economy. The proposal involve ting, �evelcp went and does not encx�ach on residenti al areas (Policy 5. Because the Property is already develoPed, the applicant has satisfied re �.rements for transportation and parking already sags requirements y (Policy 8.1.3). As discUased above, the site has direct access to S.W. Scholls Ferry Road, ,an arterial street, as required by p r for the C -G listrict. the comprehensive i�lan €� criteria (2) Affeot on health, safety and welfare of the community Thus" ro oSed The subject pacoper ky is fully built out a'..' map amendsaaent will not alter the physioa]. development of the - the Change will be to allow a wider .:.property. The o�aly �ef,Eect of • l uses a sting development, variety of conumerc�.a see witi�i Fi the ens There is no reason to believe that the change will have any adverse inn act can the health" welfare of the p � y, n�. we1 th sm� fe a community. Lui . IheAlScatew de • nni . o : s ado • ted un +4 or Ore Revised St -tutes C a to:. 97 cknowled' ent of the comprehensive x, `andm ordinanc°a,.3 The City' comprehensive plan and ordinances, have been acknowledged by LCDC; therefore, the statewide planning goals are not approval standards fo7: this application. C. '' h p.icable standards o a »rovieion of this ode or other pL► i e . alemgn, ► e nance a Chapter 18.62 of the Community Development Code establishes the development standards for the C-rG zoning district. The existing development conforms with the development standards for the C -G district. The zone change therefore would not result in nonconforming development: ( 1) Average' minimum lot width exceeds 50 feet. (2) The property does not abut a residential district. Therefore, there are no required setbacks. (3) Height of the buildings does not exceed 45 feet. (4) The site satisfies both the maximum coverage limitation of 85% and the minimum landscaping requirement of 15%. Additional development requirements are imposed elsewhere in the code. However, these requirements (e.g., landscaping and screening; off-street parking and would not differ between the I P district and the C-G district Thus, the zone one change does not affect whether the development is consistent with standards. indicated respect , parking • requirements, applicant q � these otes that staff has indicated that the . existing parking n (approximately 95 spaces) exceeds the minimum parking required by Chapter 18.106. T9. Evidence of cha in the neighborhood or community or mid ar �.nconsastenc r in the cc, r e ►sive n or' p � e roper t y wh'ic is the;' subject� g of thegdeveloteent _appl, .oat gn., The subject development was developed at a high visibility' high � � � P rather the adj, inin l P zoned development. T .e high inters than toward the and �.� oriented toward that intersection, visibility of subject property makes it more suitable for the 5�b °ect ro General mmer+Cial zoning. addition, . a eared e�o�a�m�.a�.���►iabl 1 Cot on the ro ert; may h%�ve altho�u h �,` viable development the I P zone �► property �' time of p the zoning now wppea be an..:: impediment to leasing. half of the appears to b building space in the 22,500 square foot bui�ding is presently vacant, c� reasons . s a 0 abo n , �' .+ an requests th ;oi prehenS ,ve Plan ma a designation for th property be : ream Light Industrial to '.General commercial . d'' ►f the property be chain e from Industrial. Par to ene +o erc :al w increased t a C would be eval td throe would be made for specific use on the s e city's ` process as plans Councilor Hunt advised he would approve the request. ndatid there a lot of commercia propertj)tr' In the IP zone already; It ci ed that there were two 80.000 sqi /re foot commercial uses planned for the area with om being oto Smi s Home Furnishings. Cuuneer Ftohlf noted that ODOT removed the Major conceen'he had with the subrattal of their letter. ale also noted he would ilke to sea productive use of the property. Councilor Hawley noted she would be In favor of the applicant's request, ,, Mayor Schwartz agreed with the previous comments made by members of Council, and noted that he was in favor of changing the zoning. He also noted it may be good for Council to consider rezoning the entire, flea. Motion by Councilor Hunt seconded by Coundlor checkla„ to approv the. dire re arre findings noting the` st of the star � d td �� p , requ� conclusions with regard to l .1 * p and 8.1.1 and present these findings in ordinance form for Council consideration at a later date. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Schwartz and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohl and i lela voted Nyes.I PU, C, RRING ( LIA I UD IA . I 1M. ® `. N CPA /ZONE I : ON ` " I �.. �I 1 `I5 'V , Nimbus Avenue (WCTM 151 , tax lot 1 � ). The situ Is to . ed he so � hwa� c�rr®r ®t �4 cholis *�rry �oa . d and SW i bus venue. Amen d the Comprehensive Map tan LSght lrdustraal (I _L ) and on. n g istri p frrom Industrial Park (l. P) to a General Commercial Comprehensive Plan Map and zon ing designation (C G)., APPL A LE REV'I E W PI RIk Comprehensive Plan Policies 1, 2, 5, 8 and 12. Community Develop en Code Chapters 1 8.222,18, , and 18.62. t zone, Industtriial Park permits a range light industrial uses within an indu 'ial park. Light Industrial also per ni up to . . of a develop gent comple to be used fora range f com ercial uses. 'he General ommercial zone provides sites for the .pr+ visl+ n * goods an services. Public Hearing was opened, Declarations or Challenges CITY OUN IL EErI INUr' - PITMStitt 7, 1 4 P `y " 2 ,4, Mayor Schwail#i asked the follovtfing quest,ions:' bo any .mernberiof Council with to reprt soy ex partf.3 contact or inforrnatilen gt;tthered outside the hearing„ including my site Visits? (None reported) '‘ Have a trelerribcers ftirriilialized themselves with the applicatlion? (Council Indicated "yea) ■ I Are there any challenges '51%)111 the audience pertaining to the Council's jurisdiction to hear this matter or Is there a challenge on the participation of any member of the Council? (There were no challenges). Staff Report • aenior Planner Beterersdoeff reviewed the staff report, which Is on file in the pa ket material. He noted the Planning Commission recommended approval of the application; and staff also recommended approval Mayor Schwartz made the following statement: For all those wishing to testify, please be aware that failure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford the Council and parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal tO the Land Use Board of Appeals on this issue. Testimony and evidence must be directed toward the criteria that staff will describe or other criteria in the plan or land use regulation which you believe apply to the decision. Richard Allan, 101 SW Main, Suite 1100, Portland, Oregon, 97204, advised he was representing the applicant. He noted frit) Nimbus site looked and functioned like "commercial." He referred to the competition in the area which is being used "commercial' Mr. Allan advised the request meets the criteria. With regard to the issue of adult video uses in the area, the partners who owned the property would not allow such a use. lie noted a Burger King was on a portion of the parcel. In response to a question from Councilor Hawley, he advised the building was now 70% vacant and the owners needed to make good economic use of the property. e. Public Hearing closed f. Council Consideration CITY COUNCIL MEETI NG MINUTES SEI31MEMBER i$94 - PAGE 18 Ill uJ , , '40,4 • Councilor Ilawiey noted she felt the criteria had been met. She also noted' a. compelling reason for her to believe that the zoning ntet-ded to be changed was because of the 70% vacancy rate. • Countlor Rohlf advised he 'supports making the Plain change, and indleated he too, was concerned for the economic Yalu() of the proOrty (i.e., the 70t)i) vacancy rate). Councilors Hunt and SchecIda advised they had no comment. g. ORDINANCE NO. 94-21 - AN ORDINANCE ADORING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT REQUESTED BY THE NIMBUS CENTER ASSOCIATES (CPA 940004/ZON 94-CI006). Motion by Councilor Hawley„ seconded by Councilor Rohlf„ to adopt Ordinance No, 94-21. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present (Mayor Schwartz, and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohlf, and Scheckia voted °yes.") 8. DISCUSS & APPROVE MURRAY sivirrm & ASSOCIATES WATER PLAN UPDATE FOR TIGARD WATER SERVICE AREA Ed Wegner, Maintenance Services Director, summarized the staff report. Murray Smith & Associates has contracted with the City to study and make recommendations on long-term water supply needs. After several months of hearing alternatives, certain evaluation criteria were developed and used. The Intergovernmental Water Board and ite member agencies have had an opportunity to review this information. On September 14, 1894, the IWB recommended the City of Tigard offidally adopt the Murray Smith & Associates Water playa Update and begin working wrth the City of Lake Oswego to develop a long-tem water supply commitment. Mr. Wegner advised that recently, calls were received from Portland with regard to the possibility of having Tigard become a member of the coalition studying the possibility of Willamette River sources, He noted water issues are moving rapidly and recommended the City begirt negotiating with Lake Oswego. Mayor Schwartz commented, for the benefit of the public, that this issue had been discussed at length by the City Coultcli, and Council has been briefed on the study in more detail. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES EFTE!ilIBEFI 21,1994' PAOE4 1 AL .,,:. AN IK ;& N `r/ ATTORNEYS AT LAW`, , ONE MAIN PLACE lot S.W. .MAIN STREET, SUITE YIOO PORTLAND, OREGON O72O4 *3P ;74 TELEPHONE (503) 226 -2c EI'k" t TELECOPT(503) 298-ioe,a ;1 10'+01 FI.00R,IIOl PENNEYINANIA AVE. I.$, WASHINGTON, D,Cr 20004 `PELEPHDNE(2022) 638 -3307 TELECO,PY' (2021783.0947; City : of : Tigard 13125 SW Hail `'Blvd., PO 'Box 23397 Tigard, OR 07223 Our firm represents Nimbus Center ''Associates:, the owner of the pay -. perty located at 10115 SW Nimbus Avenue, . Tigard, Oregon. We are considering. proposing a Comprehensive Plan property from Industrial ,Par]k Amendment and a Zone Change for . District try General commercial District. Before making application to the City Of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal with, the surrounding property • :attend meting on: owners and residents. You are -� invited. tQ : tend a June 17, 1994 City of Tigard Water Department Auditorium 8777 SW Burnham Street Tigard, Oregon 7:30 paMw. Please note this will preliTainamt plane. These plans stub ►ittal of the application to questions please Call me at the be an informational meeting on may be altered prior to the the City. If You have any above telephone tubber. ince P+LL.,:JA`N.0 `. 1`d:'3VA ATTO'R t~Yla AT LA rA! ONES MAIN. PLAct+ O S.W. MAIN $rRE r; SWTh 110O POI, TL.AND,'OPEG0N 972014.3274 TIE EFiHONE'.(80:3) 228 -2Ei26 TeLECOPtit 1603!`;£5- 1058" City of Tigard Pl.anna nq Division 13125 SW Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 9 ;223 Attn: Mr. Mark Robes t5 ear 'r. Our firm reprer a �ntss Nimbus .Center' Associates' with regard to an application, for Corprehenriive Plan Amendment an , ,� � located at 1411. SW Nltrib�t �►f���il Mailing Oregon. .: ��, eft l ... 'ass � � n Tigard/ g please find the Affidavit g ��o�loeed 1 and the Affidavit of Posting Notice of the neighborhood meeting to be held on 3'une 17, 1994 at 1:30 p.m. in the City of Tigard Water Department Auditorium. If You have questions or require additional .` information, Please feel free to contact me. Very truly yotrs,. eaddec76:/tigar atr Eticketwes cc: Mr. Jack'. Orchard Mr. kiehard . Aitan Debora Collard Legal Assistant STA.7_,n OF OREGON County of Multnomah 1, DEBORA E. COLLARD, ,d 'ar iri that S am :a representat.tve of the party Lnitiating interest in a propose ComprehenO i ve Plan Amendment and Zone Change affect , 'n�' the land located at 10115 SW Alsibus Avenue, and di on the 3rd day of June, 1994 personally poet notice indicating' that the site may be proposed for a Comprehenia ?.ve Plan A nentdment and Zone Chan re and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss'. usx Proposal. The sign was posted parallel to Nimbus Avenue, t of the Parking lot entrance that is closest to sofl�r�lle southeast , P g Ferry Road. DEBORA BO COLLARD SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ' before Tie this 6th day of June, OFFICIAL S;F.AL CHA LENE R. S fERC NOTARY PU2LIC- OREGON t. tCOMMISSION NC.Q2 5 I MISSION EXPIRES 4UGI. 09.1997 Notary Public for Oregon E Aires: STATE OF OREGON se. s o �nt of birlltnoinah' : ra 1, DEBORA E. COLLARD, ° being first dull sworn, a depose and say that on June 3$ 1994, caused .top' have ':mai .+ d�; tn, 'eac i d i the persons On the attached, list a notice off j eetin to discuss a proposed Comprehensive Plan Arendmen t. an Zone Change, a copy of which notice so railed is attached hereto and ,made a part hereof 1 further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said, Persona and Were deposited on the date indi sated. above in the United Statts "Pest.., Office at Portland, Oregon, v'"ith postage prepaid therec'n SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me' this 6th day of June Omura SMER il OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY AisLIO - OREGON' ..� _..... �..... -�,.. COMMISSION No.O2 652 notary Public for Oregon MYC i MISSION EXPIITO Ausz,f My c©m is ion, Expiresr,� • AVIV RNe"Y. ONE MAIN P L % 101 SW, MAIN i StREMT /SJlt'TE 1100 p RTLANtl. OREGON 92O434 LePHONe mop) 2zetlp.. is Tfli».00P+r I5O6! #05-lose IOTM FLOOCt, ttOt` P�WPI'J" Yt.MAN A AVI.'N'' :,W'%f1wiHIMGtoNN D;c,2ooe4 TCLEPKa t2O2l a3eatg,XO 1 LECOP P 12t121: If3■6047 4 t�apb; ti on P4utual 1 Si" . S aond ` 'avenue Seattle e ,Washifgto 9 8 311 our firm; represeAnts ,i4tii bus " Center Associates, tl e. •.,s� net the rop' rte' located at 10 .`4 4. $ Nnubt s Avenue, .93. and egon.: '1P114 are Considering proposing. a omprehensiVe Plan Amencilatnt and a Zone Change for the property from Industrial- Palk o General ComMercial p'istrict Before ' maktn PP ~ Y .. Tigard ,, the necessary ,permite, we a li�r��, � � � �h,� t,i� �� "��gar� �c�r , would li . to discuss the proposal; With the surrou ding roper y otorners 41114 residents. you are invited to attend a meetin i on 3'nne 17/ ". 19+94 City of 'Ward Water nepariOn t Auditorium ji 8777 SW Burnham Stree Tigard, Ores'n 7 :30 Lam. Please note this will mejjunjamxt plans These plans submittal of the apps icat'" on to qutestions please call me at the be an informational meetikig on May be altered prior to the the City. Xf you have an above telephone nuber ad gibes,' i ashington Mutual 1191, .Second . Avenue Seattle,p Washington ' 98111 Catellu F Development:, Corporation` Property'., Tax .oepart i n 201. Mission Street an .Francisco, CA 94105 ualatin Hills Park and Recreation District 15707 SW Wacker Road Bea 'ierton, OR 97005 Rolm i nson Crossing Enterprises c/6 'Terry Wilson 1000. SW Broadway, Suite 1000 POrt land, Oregon 97205 West One Bank Oregon coAot - / :Operations ..3 2105 PO Box 8247 Boise ' r Idaho 83733 Oregon Retired Persons, Pharmacy, Inc- PO Box 2755 Portland, OR 9 "1208 Thomas H. Harrington 105 Fremont Avenue Suite B Los Altos, CA 94022 Phillip Xuan Ho 11330 SW IVonwood Loop Tigard, OR 97223 .Terse C. & Virginia C. Tittle 11332 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard, OR 97223 Linda M. Freeman 11334 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard , Oregon 97223 Fenton Townsend 11336 Ski Ir +nwood. Loon, Tigard, OR 97223 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 David L. & Laura a. Jenkins 11338 SW Iron Wood Loop Tigard, OR 97223 iil1iaca R. & Betty Bennett 11340 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard, Oregon 97223 Cordell A. & Molly L. Tietz 11342 SW Iror►vood Loop Tigard, OR ` 97223 illia n W. & ':::iaa, `.r 4." Brewer 11344 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard, OR 97223 Chester Robinson Trust William R. & Constance A. Robinson 0/0 Forum Properties 8705 SW Nimbus, Suite 230 Beaverton, OR 97005 Melvin James Hansen, Jr. 11346 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard, OR 97223 Mary Swintek 9915 SW Frewing, #23 Tigard, OR 97223 Craig Hopkins 7430 SW yarns Tigard, OR 97223 Mark F. Mahon 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard, OR 97223 Joel 'Stevens 9660 SW Ventura court Tigard, OR 97223 t CITY 'Q? TIGARD, ORE( Mark Roberts August 12, 1994' FROM Michael. Anderson, Development Review Engineer CPA 94. -0004; ZON 94 -0006 NIMBUS CENTER ASSOCIATES A Description: The applicant requests a comprehr;nsive plan map amendment from Light Industrial to, General Commercial for a 2:43 acre site located at the southvpest corner of SW Scho lls Ferry Road and SW Nimbus R4,venue. The site is sully developed and is known as the Nimbus Center. FINDINGS: The applicants have submitted a 'statement in support of the request for map amendment .._ates .the traffic, generated a �nby the .ma an and�rw�dounder�thenenexal commercial s not in uses allowed . the 'change � 9' be greater that those allowed by the industrial zone. statement, sal zone. Tn the s'�ate they note that the existing parking spaces in the center exceed the number required by the proposed zone change. The existing site takes access from SW : Nimbus )'.venue from a driveway located a sufficient distance from the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road that provides minimum conflicts ,w;itb the t eef f is at the Signalized intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road/SW Nimbu' ;Avenue. Since no new construction is proposed, w 'concur that any change to the traffic impacts of the pro jest will be minimal. I� a ddition, no substantial impacts are likel y on the City utility s st .ms Therefore, we have no obsections to the proposed zone change. APPROVED: Randall R. Wooley ty Engineer n; \engi'eeet \CPA94- 04.mja ENGITEFRING CtMNEN`S C;PA. ,94, -09; SON 9 1MBu8'C%TER AG r I Aa ,►'w+mV ryT . *. .+�� k�•4�.'VTi 'l'u `'' ' f, }.' a � •yt �, ?+{!'�42t1tA'rd "VGA 1i '1 .,t • A This form must be received by DLCD at least 45 days pricy: tip final ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660, Divislou aw • w d' a�r r 1 .L'ap. a�w wl 0*' t)ti)'; rr'a.6 � ynNt See reverse side for submittal Y+eau reinests 't �. ro ' ;, . M � ra r;. A »,hrha.� i iM: +. ,•. ' ' +; y a ., k'..'r date of Final Hearing _teat 2719 1 wee! vY,t.i , «� -,: i v • �'! .`'k. ,>a ::rj0y�'� ..`..�' a +t'f'H2;'�" qtr + .1 ti .r4k il � Has this proposal been previously eubr itte%I OLC,. D? .1 X(Sf ri,,� i � a •,�; ` FA G v),2110,110 1Q4 0,11 4 a� i p r ! i4.� �. +'"�'V�'t�' +h , t•R 14 i/ dj'zt'1 K� "H� ry��� U,�,'A75,at� f rVr{.!{- Xrikii 1IU�••. *L ar /'«'�11 pk Il -Z�Gk t ��rr b rr .. FYI ��'s 1��'..•Y^4L�'�1�M��AIt .r k�Cfix .. � C.ocal File #' .0 A 94 /Zct '� 4 9 , '�4. aP.' anti. + x.rrt4 } •ice gYY,Yy�Rl'j'.'�,; • In��,J JO "404 MR T' \Yl'MiM +drA.i.t. M. N1 +A r e T Come— rcial, ,P,:;y N + ,_ Location:` 19115 ' SW t .. us Avenuef`' Specified change in Density. Current Densi y Affected State or Federal Ageneios, Local Governments or Special' Districts •. Try. -filet, ODOT, METRO City of Beaverton Local Contact Mark Roberts r City of ;Tigard Dom► File # . •`'^ , ',...:. : ..,., . ,-'.i��r ,'t.:'; ,�.. -s ;,.,.: .� r �. -, 1 .::i'� .r� 'a :/,:' c.�. 1. '.:i�' r �'- � c-i�:•r �r 1 i{ �d.:. n.� ,i:4� � .r,i� +� �"� + �i�. .a. �.i� ,r:';'. �„ . . .; :. . , ,�� . � ' -� -i'o � - � ,1 1 f��'y � �n� o��, ,A �rd i �`l .:�h I� � 1 .:�' �.� ��l ..47. ar '��ti. t' <i �-� �`�����PM j n.1.�.r° °�, ;5�:� � 'I �.i'i t 1 °�; ta ,I a � ',� �.� �.4 -_�r ��j�� ���n u 1 '1 HrA' 1'��'ik �.p ,11�i�.� :i�� �) 1 .J�. �,:i .; ��ay � :�� a :1��� ,y': i a�, r j r .(.. �i` �' ..�'..,.�i y'X P?r i' �.i' ;k i A r � t r^ k. N� r .:� � y�1� �� =i �1� ' k'M1 � + ^ �, a o- tl r �� � �;i♦ ! � � � �.. ;��', 5.:4 '•+ i ,M � � .� 1 � ,,� � , h ,':: i i .s ,�-;�• ' .�;�, �. � 'i" :i ,q,�,� � ,,,J ����� x� F, �s',; ' i '3 `- .I.. , .l � � i ���, i � , � ,, � �, !�, . � , r u '�� „ r , �. � e � y 11 M . . ��,�� . . .. , i� . 1 ... . ,.�{ � 7, �'� � , � , .�, ,� �; , �� <<. �� ,':,; i i� , r"'' r. , �! ,�, �r.. � ,;, ;#. '�.� , ��� 'r �, t i �i =i +4.. �,n r,� ,� s �15`� +� �`d ;l. ,:i�- i., .�� t �,r t ,1 �.�;,'�; ! � r 11 1ty �1- 1 i„' ' ' _ � �a� ',����, j .��I�.��. . . . . � .i.. . . . �c �{ k" i� �;, � �� ��9E8T����lOh���4"��1'9 � � � a. �; I t �f,. - ':�'�ir� w�+�r��wr�rw���rr� i - I. .;�; 4 I.. :y a,-., �,y.e •�y.� r "���� a ��� '��'.';�' !� i k'�' * �,T� f � i.. � �i, ;i .��`1 { �1 Q � } '� 1 1� • 1 1 1� e y .L ��.�'.��.�J1 ��'�I���� �-l.R � I :.I�':�' '�. � ',.;1,�, .... �11�'�E. Se t�� °' ', ., 4 ►"� �.i � r�`� � ��J.r,��s�ir�i�s �� �+� '� x,..� ..I " r,'!; i ��� /��`1�1� "'� ns.� �r �� � ���v� ,� i :'i i� - T .I. ; r '{� �" i a:, :+' i �1� ���` �ir�. �Y�amnzn � rt�rs� .�. �;, ,,. , FR�i�i. •�3,� � I� .i � � � , � " ;a ,'. , � � � , ;�; ,,� , '`�, , , r � a� � �, '�9` , .. �i � . � ��I.7 , + , I ,� . ...�. � . . .p �, . . ' ,. , .: ' . . . ,- �: � � . : � ♦�:.� � . i ., '�.�� ` � . ...�,�.- 1'.u: . ��. . ., � '. �� .��� � � ,�� , � r�� ��i ,� :flltl��i���01/�I���I���il�lfl����� �rl � . . '. � � � .' ��. �. �.�. , ' .. —�- , -�c�� � ��rr� '�a,.o� ,a�� , ; � . Cd3�YrlPREFI�:i'�SI`lE E�;A�t �1r�lE�1T ' �4-0'Q�� � ;?OI�fEry _ � ,� ' ' �IdOCAT�ON: �•t4180 :�SW:,��cifi� H�yhwayk��W�TM:: 2�1 lOAA,� �e�c .1oL��, 405,�,,,►� �'c� ,�''' °`�� ' aia�nsi,�-th� 'Lo ��h'ore�i�►e. �lr����Map; ���s� ,���id�.um� .DAnar�3t�� �e�ident3,a1�.,t ;+�a ,. ,.. ,. �; , � � � ''' � � � ��, .. G�en�r�►1 ��,Comamar�i�.1' �sd a;,. �on�.r��: 'c��;n���. �acor� '�R��.� f�iQaid�n��a3,,. �'�:� , �: , . , . , : , , " unit's��c�e� �to; �G-G (Gsn�izi��. C'a�dm�z�cia��� � ', A?PL"���L� RE�'�L'�T'.`�KIT�IA: '�`: '' �� + ,.,' ' Ci�iir�n3'�t � 1]�ve1a m��t�t Cc�de �Cl�gta�9 i:e.�2;, 1$�32,' IB.,b��;, :Cb�s+��e�►�3ve� , � � . . � , � } ,, , P . � ' �1�n P�13cs,ee 1�,� 2i; 3,. 4, 5, ���7, �', i 3,, ��1d �2. ' `Lb1�E�: R�12 ;�Multipl'i�3 �, ' �- �'i�n�,�.' ���ia�e�'�ir�l`� Z'he ���2 �s�n� a11a►w� si*�q1e--��nil� '�es�,d�nti�f�Y ua��t�,� �,4. �: '`' � ' ;G du . , . . , . , ' ' � ` �.a�:r�eic��±n�ial uni.. ~� . � �� .. ., 1.�t�it�r''`resl�d�nt,�s�. " �.�, , ' : �` �a ca t�to �rult�i�Y��r' famx�1y ras"i�en�i�l � ' -°° care� �acxl�.'tie�, im�bi�x� h�iae .�gark�s i�nd ��tu�d�.v�:��ions�� �ula�,ic �upps�zr��. • ,� {`: , , , ,. ,�r �r�rvic��►,� rgsx'dorit�.a�' 't�a�tma�nt� hQm,es, m�ufa�tv�i°ec� �+�ss, faa��»�y ti.a� ,. ,, ' . o �.: tl , � ,` 'A . � „, .. .. `.14�9@'�',��1'!t°� , , , , .', I , ',a, cztra, hom�s o�cupa�ion►�, �aric� te�pore+�sy n� oth�er�.us��. , ,� ,. : � ; ; � . , _, ., �� � � � � ��� ��� ; `��� �� �. � �,, � � , �. � . - � �Y . , " , , . � . ,.� , . - , . ,. 'I ,. ,.i , .. • . . . . ' � A�C�che►�',.�.,-�.�� t��` 5��e P����� ,a�d app3i��r�t � ' �a�e�n+en��. �'oar `yor�� �rw�riew. . Fram ; � . � :", inS�+��'.�aat�ac�n� ,�'�u�gplied ,by �v'r�riou� �epa�ctt��n�s arld ;aqdn��et�,,�� .a�c� from,;'"oth��r„ i'r�for�r�,t�„r�n ;a�ail�b�s to o�r.�;stafrf, A �cepo�� t�nd �ecoz�ine,�r�c�a��.�,can �ail�., be prepz�r�c� , , ; � . �►d � a�eci�s�.an w�1�. b�e rendexed s�n dhe �aY��+os�l �,n �tk�e, ii��r �u�us�+':, I�' �ou wish : � tc� cgA�nidlr�r�t o�a'thia� �ppl�,+�ati�s�, w� n�ed ycsu� ',�omma�►ts �.y, �:��,,,_?; 1994. . 'Ya�t au�y ' ° us� th�a s�ace pro��►3d�id be�.�ow cr at���h a s4p►Ars�t�„l��t�t�z� �o �,F��i�u�,ri yci��� ce�r►m��1�t�� ' ', �. . ' , �f ������tn�ble �ca: �e���d,bv �h�:above d���, plerlse p�r�r.�� +��e�:.s�af f contaet� . � , �� i�lT/��4�11��\�IA��r �. . �� . . � . y� n�� and c,:�nfi�� y�ovr�:� C�ncnt�s ,i���wri�ing'as, soo� a� .' ' n�kec� belcw r�►ith t�u� �o�e . �, pr�s.�xla:e�. �:f you �ha��� a�ny s�g��iona reqarc�ii�q 1�Yi3:� �C���ir, cond�c�''�1he �igarc� P1aa��ir�g, Di�p�rtm�e�at a �+3125 S'� Hall. Al.vd., `Tig��d, OR� ;�'�223.� "FHO1�E: 8`39-41'7�;. � ;'`� �r r • 1 }, .,�A..F C0�371�CT. Mark Robert�i . � � � . ,tl . : � , . � , , � '::. , ' ' �LFAS� GHE�C�K TFiI� �'�L�+DWING I�CEM� T'�1AT Ap]FI.r3C:, ,:� � ', � ; � � . , . ,, � , W� havca �,�-�,vi�v�ed the pro�a�al.anci ha�ve na ���oc��.b;��g ro ���.� � : `��� . ` °5 ' .' ' 1:: ... .� ' . � J � x � x 1 1 I .. se �on+�ac� . of ouL 'c��Lice�. + ; ' , Pl�� `' _..�.._. .� ,. , ., , , , . , ^ . ; ,, � ' P�l�ase r�fe�r �o t�e enc�.oser� letter� ',' " � a , � ...r.�.,�. � �� � � � , ' {'i�T�'lt� � . ; , . , , .: �• � en Cb�unen��. . �. � ...a.�. � �� � � � � � � �.'��� � . , , , , � , :, i. i . , ;, . , . .. .. . ,:, ,. . , . - , , . ,' , • _ , � ;,, , � � � �� � � � r._ ; � ■�i�l���l�ll�l�lmil��qt]i 11�.a0 ..... .... ...��., ._I���Yls�l��Ir�I�Y1A�l�. .;.,. .:�.. .. .._�» . ...� . ,,::.. ... i..:.. �� n .�i I .. .� .. , . .. � , • ; -• �.�i. I .� i . . .� ,i n.i . . � r . . . �. ..� ���. e... . . . , . . . .. ., ���.� , i� ,. �'. y � . N . . . . . . �I. .'. �.� ���� . �� ,.,� „ r1 . '.. . � � . .���.. �. . .:. .: �.'.�.. .. ..�... . .��� � � , n�:� r,f:, �'� �'�. �. �Ol����II III���IIYI����11��Pl�Y�I��� ' . .� '� " : . �.. J�� �"'�. e.u�rr���t�rri�.YS���mr . :! . � »�� . . i.� L � � o . . , , .. . � . , • � . . . . y � ... � i y./� , � � ... �� . . . . � W • ` �� ; . . ..� . ... ..�... . .,� .�� .a.�. .:� , h ...., ...._: ..._ . . _...'.. ,. ...... . . . .. i'��.. ... .. . � ,1 , � �� � � . ..��.. ,_. __�. ..... . �. � , � �, � ..��w �r.�l� �. J �IrrirW Y/ �'� � .i ,. , .., � , , . . . ., . _._... ., .. .:.. . . � .. . .. . . . , . . . � � . . . .. . . � �, . . .. . � .. , . . . , ... . .. . '�I .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . � . . � . . . , . . ,. , . .� . . . . . �.. .. .:.. .. � � � � �� �..�. . :.. .. ._.._.. . .._,. ...,. . . . -.. �a`rr�"st�:.eoe�.. �r��nrr�yr',1lr..1 `' a . .i .. i ��. � �: . � ' ... . . �,.� �'� . .� L. . �. ��,��� � � � Natriu� t�� �er�':�on Com�te�tts.ng: „r;,' � '� �Y`Y�41 Ci!llMfiWlIYI�II I "��'^', . r, � .., .. . . � � � '�� I .' . ;.. � � .� . . 1 �� � .� ' � .. .. i . ' ' „ ' �h I' �� P�on�t fitcim�r�r i °��, W �1��� . . ; . � ' �, ,. , , , . , • �.� , „ ,�' J ,I , , , ��� �, ,: , . . ,� � �, , ;, , � , , ,: . , � , .. �, , �; , ,�'` � � � � , �j �, . � �� � � � � � � _ i � '" , � � � , ,� �� � � �� � • , ,: , � `', ,. , .�, . , . . , ,,; � � . �,� 4 � A � �� � A t'� � , i l � . . . � . . , 1 �I' p . i . . . .. . . . . . . . . .� . i . . . . . . .. . , � i. . . . �..�.....�w � �" I � ..� e i r .- � r e �. . �.. .. . . .,.� ..., - .. . , ; � t � ' a I� I I � ��W �� . .. � I '� ��I.i . ,. ., . . . „ . ., .. , . � . , .� ' . I . . , ,. . . �A . � ; � I: ' � ' t i� y � �,��1 �� , .a � �I �p' r . I ! . . . . . , .. . . . I��� .. i ,., �. . � . . � � , . , . . .. . . � , . . .. . .. , . . .. .. . . .., . . . . . . . . � . � . . . i . . .. . �. . . . . ,. � . . . � „i � , . �. .. i, , . . � . .. .. . , � .. . , , . � ,i � , ��' � �i. I � i I � a, l R y� i � t � , i � � , � �� � �� � �� � , , 1� a t � � "t ryp I . �, . . . ' .. . . � ' , � ���w .. ��/ i�'1 k i.#,'.lf . � � .. . , � M. �i � . . . � i . r . .i.. . , . .. . . . . .. �.. . . . � , . .. ,. . . . . . Tr`. i i . . .i .. . , . . . .. . , . . . . . i . :� �..1~.'. � . I . .� � . . .�...� .��.. .. .. . . . .. . .. . . .'��� n� I� '�f F � �r�'� �1.. .1� . . . � . . .. . . . . . . . � 'I . .. � . . . . . , . . . . .1 r! �,aY .'�� 4 l.. .NM�.. �� . . . .. . . . .. . .,. ,� . . . . . . .. �. � .. . . � , .,.. , w.. � „ . � � % �ry,l ` .,:. e�i Y i ��` � 7 i S. . ���<I t ,ti 7 t e a 4 a � \t a 1; I �h , � ; i � "° "�f l 1� c�, � •� ..S ��"+ � '�� •�'S • 4 � ( i� 7 �1 �� � �� I Y r � j � �: �i 4a �� I �' � '�1 � � t•` ` f � r I � �� V.�. ! � I l , , ( � ' ' .1 � a ” 4.�' y . � >y(�" I�� , '` i r ��� �� 't� ry � I s. r� i �i + �� f�-� i' ��t� i - � �- � ^ � y �' i ° r '�; '� I. �,� r �� i � . ..,. r n r .. .. . .. , r � , i .... i , �.. . ., � , � _.. . , . . � . . � �. i 7. � � . .� , . , . . r i . �. . � � x. � , � ',��,�5� �R ���� �' � . .. �.Ir '�� � . ..�� �.�.�..i��.. . � `� i . ' ':. ' :x f a" _ ,� ' '_ i". � �:�.i �` ' DA,'TE:� S�pt�i�tl�`r' 2�'. �.99d ;. . , . ,, . .. , � , . . _ �nn�e�e�w��� , .. . , � . � . , . .. . .. . . � . ..� . . . . . .. , . � . � �J . � . . , -. . t.' . . , . .. � ,, . � � . ,. .. , ., ,� , .,. � . . � . .., . � ,,. . �... .. �. . ,:, .�. . .�;.�� �� .;, � ' FRC>M: Tiqa�ti Plan�i�g Depa���r�nt �';+ { � ' . � RE iI -, CB�REI�ENS x,'ttE P�LAN ."�2�IE�D�,'4i�1T ` CPA �4� 0 0 0'S Zo�,.�CH1Ri�G�.'., 20N 9 4=Q Q � . � � � � EI , � ' 04 . , .[��.: ` ;,-; Lc�CATTOI�: �41�:'�� S'�T �Fac�.��c Hiq�w�q.y � (�TCZ`�i �S� �;AA��; tax;;].ot�:401)'. ., "�o `,` . �a�r1c� ��a Cen�pr�hmn�r�vc� ,:P1�s� I�a�: ��om I���13uta ,'�n��ty �rsaidant3.�1 ;to � 1, . , '� ��n�r�l +C�.ancae�cia�. . �ind ,�ei zor►i�g'� cha����', �rom ��1� ,`�;�Re.�icl�a�t�al, J:2 •�fz�lit9����e� to C�G (Gsneral Comrn�rc�.a3,).� � �, AP�L;���iT�� ��R�V'�� ��t��`�tI:A: ,' `�:oma�nuni�y� D�velopmen� CQd�, Ch�pte�� �18:2�;, iS,,��o 18eS4; ��pre�es�s�a.v� -�+' ��.an Po�.iei�#s 1, 2, 3`� �, 5, `7, �, 9, a�nd �12. "�6�P1�; R�`12 (Mul�s�ple� ,-�� ` � �'xunily F�es�a�e��i�l) �e�-R-�� aca�e allowa► a���1e��'��1�, regid�,ntial;uriits, ,% ' du�'l�x .rosider�tial unit�� mult3;p1�-F�mx1y �es�de�rial u�iCs, �es�.d0intx�al ' , " ` � " care fa�i�.i�i�g: sa�}aile haane par�ts �nd su�xvis�,oras, ���lic supp�r�� , " ; , �ar��.���� seszc��n4ia1 t�aatmet�t 't�omes�, ma�u�ac�,ur+�cl home�, f�aily d�� �. , , , :: ���e, hama o�c��,�at � r �t' o �u:�»., . ; ° ;` � �; ions, a�d �ampo�a� �u�eg �im t�er , � . , Atta�c��d� i� ,t'�� �i�'e P�.� ��,€� �appl,ic�ti•� ;�st��:�u►ant far y�ur ss�yi�w.� l�ram �n�o=mati�n �►up�lied l�y varxc�'�s� d�+part�er�ts � a�►d ; aqeneieig �nd £�c�m' o�her ����rn�i�icn �wai�.able i�o c�u� ��a£f, a r'ep�r� a�d recomrnencl��i�n �rf�.l he �ar��argd , , , . ..� , �.,' . and a de��.ai,o� w�.11 ba rbradexed.cn t�e proposal� in tT�� n�t���.° fu�usa�. Yf yau �ris� ` ' " I �s� �om�hent� can ti��.� app�l3.ca�ic�z�� we n�e� you� cumms�t� by a�,_,t�?, 1994. � Yot� x�a� �s� the gp�ce p�ovidad b�3�w �►x a�tach a sepr.rate let�e� to a���urn �rour co�en�s. ��1 r . _ ��f�e dat�a,. le�a�e �hca�ia t'�e ��a�f f �ant'ac� • If .vou ara i.a��.b1�e to ras ond: bv th� z�av . . � �sat ou�,�c�mm�ertts . '. . . r .��.��..,o P� �_ ..��� ...�,;� ts �nd c �.n wriCing a�s �i�or� �a,s . 1�' + , . � � . ' , n . lskh oux� � �c�iromen ,, , _ . ,a . .. o�ced belo��t h �aossibl,�,. I!� �ou hav� s�y �ue��lox�.� r�g�sdin� ���.� matte�, �cantac� �h� T�.�a�c� , � ��,annir�� �epx►rtment, 1312� Si� HaI�X �3�.tird., T:�ga�el, OFt,' 97223. P�Y�N�.': �39-�171, �' S��' COI�'T��T. P7ark Rob � . . a , ,� � , • erts �� ;�: kl ; . '�'EMS THp►i APF�Y: , . : ,. ., P�,�� CH��.i4 �HE �'aL . �owi� z `' We �ave 'rev'iewQd'the Proposal �nd� ha�+e no abj''�c�i.�ns ,ico it: , . , , � _„_„�, �2easo �on�act � Tof aur offi�e. ,. - � ; < , , , ,. , w�► , � . , ' ,� efer to t1�Q �nclb�ed ].etter: ' , �'le��e r, : � ' �d'ri�ten Cammei;t�: y� ' ' �.� �, , ��� �� �� , . . , '. . T t�. ur *_f'��'�: �4"'�_ -a .��:� .o �� , - , . � . ��... ��. � . r. f! ..�..� . �,.. ..,.. ::�./ , ,. � .,.. :.5r. . � �`Y1Lf.1rJl�/E:G �../fIlL� .�.. ....�� . ��� . ��� � y , � . ., �.�► : M�� � ,.. � ..ni�lirri.�I�.�� ��� ic1W.i.�wYi����� ,f'/�Q�.. `� '�..�l1��7"�i�r�.�.���R'�Af"1T�� .J�6i//Riili �6�r /�Q• . � i (/�'���' ,. � .i P��1r.•R�W ai i w IlI���r� m Mw�w��.�l .x� . i . .. �i . , . . �p� ,. . . . . . � �...� ..� . ..... . ' ... :, ., ,.�.: ... ,. ,. � ���� _ � � . . �� .,' �... ����� �-,..Yi',�.r_� .`'� v ; � Ze�t� < , / f- - . . - .. _ �. ����� ' , � � a" . , � ., 1�.,��.o��.a�11��� ' , .� � � �� � , . . . . ..� �._: ..� � ¢.Y��.;:.��s..a.�......� . .��.�� .S.. :.�� .... . . .��' r..i �' I.�� � �� '� , � ... . ,. , . . .. . i . . �.: " ��� - ..�� i� . . . . .. � . � � i..� . .. . . . . . . �.,� , , ., � .' ,. . , .�,�� ,,, � ;���. �. ��, ���� i � Name a€ Pe����� C�aimeni:it�,g: ���.rL�f/G��'�•--�' �� _ � � .�..+��.���..�tiu'e..' � , . � , , �, ..1 ' ' Phorre I�ui�e�s . , , � ..� � , _ ,, . ,,{ , � � .: , . ; � . � : ` . , � , 4 .,,. ,i � i � „ , , , � � .� � �� �� , �� . � _ � i� , .. , , � � � � ' i , , , : : , _ , , , ����� � . � �� ����� „ , � �� , � . � � , � : , �; `� � � , , ; � � ,��. ��� � � � . �� , , , . . . � �� � � , , r ` t � � � r ' � i � i ir; �i �' " ��� , i i� ;p ��i � , � �� , : ,� . . . i; > .. . ,.,.;,. ... .>. . , . .� .. ... ,.,. �.w i � . ,.,....,�,_ . . : . .�;� .... H' ,., ,,.; �_.'.. .w.�;... , . : �.�..�.�. �. [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]