Loading...
CPA1990-00006POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. 1,', ) .. 7 s'....•'- 4,„: ?!....:." .•,'.,.. ;'.. .. '...,,f.I.: ••tt.t::.'..,,,',','",.‘4,;.; ..1.,4:6;;',.,....".• ' .'''''.::'..• ..‘,..., . , ,:.,•- ,''',..::::,. '..:'..',.;' ,..• . .,-ih..' •••:',..'.'''., . . . , .., , „..., .;.„ •,; • -, ., k• — .... ..... '.1 fr.' ':'..." :,..• " . .. , ,,,, ..., l'i■ , I, .:. 1 • \ ! : li..... '5. 11,1 r'..,r . ■ ,■,,,, : , .. . I STi AfE OF OREGON, County Of Washington' ) ss. Gty of 'Tigard ) C.t. for the city' of .Tigard, Oregon. of the Tigard City Council. of which the attached is ,a ccPy (Marked Exhibit Aj upon each of the fol1owirl named Persons on th +a day of . 19 ►y mailing to each eit them at the address shown on the attachOd list (Marked 'Exhibit B); said notice is h'reto attached, and desrosited in the United Slates Mail on the .-- day t..� 4%11tin,,ffllt/1 cur , drr • i I* * A", "7 "rr k *x 4PO *4 `" :K ,r `� •� dfan� J'1 to Ir y� jy „ . i a < " paned @!once o 19:C b Postage' Prepaid. to before me this day of otar"y Public of Oregon My 'Comm scion Expires; ice/Del itrer'ed to Pos Ofei WashiiI2ton County, . Oregon i= ®' WIDER -- BT Q=TY c • Cdacorning ease Number -) g 06 ▪ Nanu of Owner: Vario> L.2 rer® Name of Applicant': C. t " pf . Address 13125 SW Nall. Blvd. City �i, d.._..s.. State OR ip • Address of Property: Gen®raalU.,, he »et i® u d®dd, u►ralA ►a a 'a Locust street Nall leoaal 8ard�.,,, ®w and ....Ni4it ,,, X17 w .t(y,] ®nMfi.offfia ; xacortarsratia► sections of thaax s „hwa , r% L is Tax Map' and Lot No (a) . S .: ,.n...,r....wmurn .. • Request To change the *currxent plan designatiian from commercial Professional back to Lcv and Medium Density 14e*identiai for the area illustrated by Nap "A" and ! to ' change the Tigers cc npreherisiva Plan text (policies 11.0.1 to 11.8-5). to dele'Je the criteria: and conditions that were to have applied sPecificallY to the President Parkway urban Renewal District illustrated by m a p Z O N E : A-4.5 ( e ids ntial, 4.5. . Action: x „ Approval as requested Approval with conditionaa D nia1 . No Notice was 1,nsbl& ►h ..d in tho newmpaper4 posted at City Hail, and mailed to: The applicant and owner(s) • Owners of record within the r gnired distan a • . The t f feeted Neighborhood Planning organisation isatioi All'fected governmental agencies sIGNigni eN i Decision: THE DE 9 /SON -. tigccHEs E,tmECTIVE ON et The ado sad findings of act dSciaiOnn and stata of conditions �tia obtained fr4m the PLaaniag De �eat, Ti g �d dit y Ny. � � 3125 � b 13 , 11.0. Box 23397, Tigard, Oreegon 97223 - .,on be eat: ,i.ned, by filin bra n tice Qf .nkent �' y g g � ` itin the ®ria>ar ®n. Tr►a�ndl Use Boa�ra�l of ��i�a�aal® (;�ttldJet►) actoors�3.aa tc ; the A r ®�r ew a 't ► ® c a procedures. g • 4 EsTxoN a r if you hava awl `, quetitiona, p1eafe d dall trio Tigard d carder at '639 -4171. I11km/CPA9O --O6 . B 9I.1 0 / 9 .yiap O Mmairsou�trY� — Boundary for the Costae vial Detrolopsent plan area. toomiceisensixo 11413.1 —11.8.5 Opply to this Eindits) ecalo CIS" OF TIGAPb, b O DINM NO. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS. AND CNorma TONS s A A a To Amon COMPRE -:� y NSIVE' PLAN L, tITS' ° URBAN ' CIVTGE THAT PORT oti OF VIE pRESID°"S PWAY RENEWAL DISTRICT WHIN . WAS DESIGNATED COMMBIRCIAL caa felst $,IOR CK T DENSIT9t RESIDENTIAL AND TO DELETE THE R1i ATED COMPREHENSIVE Pty POLICIES .8.1 l'.GL,S� DECLARING A ! , CPA (POLICIES 3,1 amabemim sew.0an/ a+ sraYO,4 01110alDmea0ms® uo011® ssmwasl frmy® R. mlairleouanatemomdail ® ®mlifhbemao•1somaoo .... m ®ae■11•ae•aor,sIMaw ® ®C) ... WHEREAS, on May 15, 1990; T gar°d ° s citizens wt d not, to ; allOw the use . of tax they nt funds to suPPort antation of the President's ParicsaY urn Renewal District. WHEREAS, on June 11, the' Tigard City Council repealed the President's Par y Urban Renewal ` Plan and on august 2, 1990, filed an Affidavit of Extinguishment with Washington county to nuilifi said plan. WHEREAS,, Comprehensive Plan o'h. a o that, If for any reason t Pre®i dent ® ®. P�rrkw� DD�9� t Plan VA not � or approved, H9t� within 90 �du�yaa of inch a deoiaion, the Tigard Oita Council aiatt1,l hold a pub3.1.0 hearkng in order to re-evaluate the the. ptiliOies uoted above snd the Coarprehensive 'Plan Amendment. " WEBREAS, seiVeral public meetings wero 3 - input Ne QrAa i" Planning Organizations i� aid Planning Arga t tion®) regards to ideas, a d at the restatingai lid t .fazuctud changing t , . he si e . Plan + . of Itho area k to what:' previous to the I t of the urbmi renewaa l "Pin seal , associated text ;gin+ inter. tannums, ,'a .474..246 199 ®. the :Tigard Pl i®ei "` " followi . to d 1 hearing ,� unsnimoUS in ,a motion, 7Tp.,pittott4 to " city. .a' .I' to 04' reverse the vision that an; ed the i ;Plan residenet' s Parity prOpasiii, ' (2 ) to del pho ua - e Playa *Valuate 1 development' ° 'tom it t � ®� and ���. fi� �� � ��'�' �` � WHERRAil, On AugUst 13, 1990 the Ti gas, i City Council " aced d 1 tion 9 o initiate th Play heain'retweiVIO Pi tin e h 0 - t , :. l�' teit re-evaluate a��t a��f� te aid Plan N, ' ' aaan AS, tie aau cit il ad w Pl Cau fial ®r on d s rc 1 a 1990 t0 tw P." .,. a. aatte , m wel . de eiv bli+ 't ®St dye® Obi.. ....0 O. 90-i Page 1 The 'proposed Comprehensive P _ relevant criteria based, upon the attached facts,' ;findings3 conclusions noted in :Exhibit .. a The Comprehen .. lye Plan Mai ff.'s ,amended 4 to change t&* rent pi ca .designat -- n from' rciatrProfess,tona1. back to 'and � Aediva Density Residential for the area illustrated& - -- - change the Comirehensive Plana Tom. (Policies . ' 11. 3. to ii • noted' : in Exhibit ' E to ° delete the criteria and conditions, were to have applied ,siecificallY to ,a Portion_ 0,? the' c Prosidentjes . Parkway Urban n al District as illustrated The Council declares Ica ' , M ;s°Feats that this Ordinance 474111 be effective upon its ecuti by the vote ' of all Council present after being read by n mbar and, title only, , this `` �) da of September, 1990. APP ROM t ; 'IHIT A a&76V[dr : STAFF Rk1PORT TO A JOINT MEETING OF THE TIGARD PING : oommisszom AND CITY COUNCIL SEPT/224813R 1O 1990 -- 7:30 P.M. TIaARD CITY HALL -- Taw HALL 131as SW L SW). T/GMD, OR 97223 1.: FACTS o ml+nro® CASE: Cosprehensave Plan Amendennt CPA 90 -0006: REQUEST: 1) Phan Hap liViagendment from (approximately 78 acres ) to, Low Density Rosidential ate#, kikkiStom Density cider cal (approximately 10 aura®) m ', Deist . Comprehensive Plan P liCie® 11.8.1 to 11,. 8 S which ware: to have appllied , tf9.caai,ly to the proposed President ®s Parkway Urban Renewal District. The plan tenet outlined a process for development aand , atpproval of a ester plan for the prOposed,Presidentcs Parkway Urban al area, future rezoning, provision ®� neceasary public facilities. AZ 1E4E0 '1 City of Tigard. *LOOATIONi See attached Naps A and, S. See attached Nape A and S regarding th1,, area proposed for reai deleted. it S for the aaa Ptalica:® Which The proposed Comprehensive Plan s ffi4 891 " stap in process which was prompted by W , ,� " re�llal't'.�.:n� to the President's �' Plate �. X1. �4 0 61f.f for any reason the . �+® Parkway Urban Apia s es D „, � adapted ems' 0 90 ,,.y, City ,,Ccous4:11, •shall hold the policies noted above (esolosed as Attscisont A) end :a `.. Comp.ensive Plan r I n Nay, 1990 the to increment method of fumding the Urban newal PSBR Wag jected ' ffif�y nt ° s P 'iii wrF6 vot, ,. V ently' h... ed stiff tO ,Mac with v tlq'. . 00e al aad r Staff Report CPA - 90-0006 gletel:m1,1160 the future of the faii.ed t increment financing distriLat,. ' A public hearing was subsequently held before the Planning i esie n in this regards. The general consensus i of the neighborhood planning organin & time at,+� the citi.nen participation organization' was" to ;chaaange the Plan for ithe area bee4 to what it was previous,'-'to' tae' Pr esident t e Parkway , propaonal . In 'additions, the Planning Can aieeican was un:,nimouw in a notion, l' 'To '. recommend to t; a City C uncil to: (1)' B reveroe the clacieion that amende . the pre enaive Plan p and texct which initiated th. President • e Pale:: ay' pro \sal, and (2) initiate a planning effort to devezlop an area plate ueaing the Metzger- Progress, Plan as. the bani •. to evaluate future land use and d v,.,l aunt 'opportunities in the area. There wane were non viduanle who testified that no c ial and profen �:ional uu€saa r.,• 'appropriate' for the area, and they desired the. City to evaluate the new aa�md feasibility for tla®®® nee ;, 4 ObtAn Cr: I Tne on August 13, 1990 or ®V1�6� ®8 90 to initiate th® Plate nnt� an ,d above. W� ®0a.Yi� l t®tbYLAy i � was bear at ths heating supporting, g the Pl ataiag affii ®n °e redo . ndlation end • xat® hqr than eactensti.v 'content rea a ,ved fn a the ' groups within the,,., last several here were, no add tionaal, r n , �. " Or contents. nt t FINDINGS. Ape USIQMS . i Th applicable le 8 aatewidn Pla ni Goal 'Criteria' in ' ,thin came are (State atide Planrainq Vials 1, 2, 5, . 10, . 5taati :Planning ng ° v7„ n 3, ef,, , 8,. 11, 12, 14# 16, 17, 18, 19, j not apply. It is .tionoluded that the propoaral i®. nsib u t . ,with sppk bable' Statewide Pl Y a and Quid ®line® the fCl i finding: ogoas4„ 1 j, f fits ' a •au,l m ' city o�Ilta , Tig 'tentiinSts ' •th opPortUnity ,,for citit to invo1 Viaaw a _. pp liett4nn 9 •1irbatio,`,un to • n g d ®vela . nt as ttn ®n is r®fer�anl Of � thou gh the re vLew ®f c tas C a�.�a�t ®a3e f� � u mmtl,�a a�e and d... l n ar . gfla tear d - ®i f end' through following .,.preteribed notification te car li o , haatingit and *Aided' Of decision® `oti000 of the s Ch em • Raz. and text sitn a twhne aid to ! n b ; planning a sati 80 i f Tigard T.....1,vkan and 1 to � u �i � pro Jets i to thu awip ndnent off A- rt CPA 90.0006 ea Liu ..r The City Council and Planning Commission ` will receive either written or oral to ciaony.. -at a Public Hearing to be held September 10, 1990. "a3, --a PLattl lIAe PlaJctrla This goal is satisfied through city Procedures which call for. th Ctty to aPnlY all n slica le statewide Planning Goals v City ComPrehensiv Pl A Policies, and communitY, DeveleP ent Code Reguirerents to the PraPcsal being presented. Go ::1 9 � r� ce a _ a tu l _ _a .®) This g oal is satisfied because any future d 1opc ent in the area will be acconplis hed in accordance with City, state, and fedMrat regulations which ate in.ended to Protect existing' wetlands significant vegetation, Strew= end wait rshede, and other natural features in the area. 411.-- a r1.,Ki ,,,Q,i5a.r This grad is addressed because any .Ir development a, »c )o aaaao affecting the 1 00 year floodPlaia, floodwaYs, and wetlenndsee of the area will be re4iesed according to the City of Tigard' rd' sensitive lands ordinance and by aPProPriate ° estate and federal 64eaoieS. Coal„ 1Qs at> Iar l Hou .. ing opportuntties will be mtintained by amending the Plan frost Commerlflial - Professional back to pm end medium "Density oidenntiaal. Tho applicable City of T ga rd Comprehmmita Pier Criteria in this case ads; 1.1.10 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.4.t, i1.4.2, 6.1.1 it is concluded that the ProPosal Li consistent with applicable City of Tigard beensai ve Plan Policies based s rod they foltowi ng findingsg ' ga..kgaliSX-12-411 Am isdiosbmiluimiously the change IL j„ co, ,o with r aPPliCable -Statewide Pl . . Through an a ivy Citizen . involvement PrOciii regarding thm Wrorosed actions the P1in i.0 being kePt current with the needs of ity, LIM .1221.1aigea p *9 �p 0 ®'sY�e4 m� rtd3ap2 policies* i• be-addreised through review of a any future development not seals for the subject area that may have., is an the destugusted floodlasis f loedway of Ash Creek aid associwbod wetlann y future deal nt ' seals effecting the a will ®e evaluated the Citi reef. u a Tiga'srd' e . ' Sen®i tine tends 'revirew Process'. Furthermore, p:. sal affecting wetlands will be rssiewed by the sPProPriSte state aaud federal agencies. y , iedium Das"anssitg� 1 will a�in�.;Rsndg� th eanit �oraaa~�ahaicl� to �i �� �.a�v►,��ae� densities and Kasai ttia�l. will. not affect redesigmtaon City c�' �' ��o2 the � . subject area to ret i den y — O . d p� y- c l.i.aae with Oregon ianti. Rules, d „had sear dd®, Hiv��ai� the Imo+ lita�an Housing Rsa1e a hawing rtuanity is for single family multi-Emily and medium residential Aansity for developable reside ntial properties. The City °housing opstottunity index ourroutlY rrovides ka oPPort amity for 10a 22 dwelling units Per staff Report cPA ai 90, -0006 afire vacaH' t b3lUdabi( 11acra yid i I • Ifwid34i0•: t9L'63rOf►�YdAi d61drY• :., r ®a rsene a l that .the .0 preheua i e ::. nded ' o c➢han the svurrent "P1 dceignaUo a Erma rcial -'Profo eia l ya k . to ,L 4 �s ' I edi ��n ®. � eid ®n�i�t�. cr " th ," 41*0, 11 o�{tr�� ' by to change t he , prehe�n� 03 i a a Pi' an. T �9 d�l4��� , ��� ���� ®X PoUec o.ie aa� ® , . i�• ► �®• 1 the o � �' .� k a '�P � io 1, d�' o�if il Renewal »Letrict ae illuatrate b p ao� • w Prepiuned bya Ron, Bunch, tenor Planner ter the coma 180$$difti a pllit% °Me 10ae voliailiki itlf18.6111,7 to thils, 4 40 $ ma_ • POLICIES EXHIBIT ffi LAN POLICIES TWIT APPLY TO PRES'DENT ! S PARKWAY II eao®esoani�marp:a rrromeoaemeero ousmrimoea+rm�_on+mew.0 mmaor ®eorwoeer®e AroobrrwaaoNwr:wYarroae anawaeairelln ry 11.8.1 A COMPREHENSIVE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT o PLAN S � PREPARED POP THE AREA SHOWN AS NAP TWO. S CO NC num DE � LOP���T PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED ADOPTED AS . ' A PLANNED DEVELOPERNT OVERLAY DISTRICT SUSJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF.SECTION 18.80 07 SIR CITY , OF TIGARD COIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (C6 ) 11.8.2 WITHIN I l'T E IDENTIFIED '; AS NAMED D tOP T PLAN MAP AtIENDMETATt Z CHANCE Sr i% D PI T ':: ,118.120 CDC): CONDITIONAL USE (18.130, CDC) AND 13 7, $IQN (18.16°- 162r CDC) SNALL FOUND TO CO !r ""•,) OM' APPROliED CONCEPTUAL OF A 'DETAILED DEVELOPNENT PLAN FOE E a P `@SE IDENTIFIED IN THE CONCEPTUAL :DEVELOPMENT PLAN ... ,S HALL 13 SUBJECT TBE EEQUX OF 18.00: OF � 'tea N CODE QUIREMEWIS 'TO THE E '• P MWP SED® IN ADDITION, CITY SHALL RE UIRE 1►IfNY y DETAILED ASSES OR. IODATE OF AN. EtISTING SE I ' Y' AS NECESSARY POE ANY, ITEM .00TLINED POLICy IN ORDER TO 'APP: I. `APPLIII0a FOR VIL S E ADOPTION OF S `ICY laiD APPLI ONS R,SP D .TO , IN TXIS S *47T/ , ING R .PUBLIC ! s= y THE w't ®r11 . CITY DURING . P . 1, XO E ' 1 . ... ®' ' , : •. • CONCEPTUAL I DEVELOPMENT PLAN (11I .0.5) a ST .suose P, RIO TO OR CON ° + 'MP OVi O, ION 11. • 3 PLI �G _ iNE =NOR • IN NM= ON ING MAnr,,216iNCE , AND DP:,,. EP .OF;RUSTING, RPFME" AND MICR TstILL NOT, : PHASING PLAN: THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM BY PHME , ALON, WITH TEE .NECESSARY PUBLIC FACILITIES, UTILITIES*. R• ftNSP®RTATION IMPROVEMENTS, BOUT ON AND OIL -SITS, WHICH ARE NEEDED OR EACH PIKE.. THE PHASING PLAN SWILL SO IND'ACATE MEASURES PROPOSED TO DUCE CONSTRUCTION I PACTS AND ON -GOING a NOT BEING REDEVELOPED, AND 'TG ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS.` • TRANSPORTATION 'ASSESSMENT: AN ASSESSMENT' OF THE ON AND OFF -SITE T FIC REQUIREMENTS RESULTING ,TING F oM Amp RELATED TO. E PHASE OF DEVELOPTONT., THE ASSESSMENT SHALL IDENTIFY TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS s LUD C- TSIT, ' REDUCE POTENTIAL TRAIFtC SAC'S ON -ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS AND °THE DEVELOPMENT Ate. • PUBLIC FACILITr ; °,t U 'ILXTAT ASSESSMENT: ASSESSMENT OF, THE ON MD OFF -SITE a ERe SEWER,' MIME AND UTILITY' HEMIREMENTS RESULTING FROM AND RELATED TO ''EAM Pte% OF DEVELOPMENT, •. FLOOD CONTROL AND FLOOD .1 'ION _ASSESSMENT: ASSESSMENT, JIMAGE • P3". CONCEPTUAL. DESK FOR TEM -TRIaLAND PONDS AND likra PROPOSED-AS 'PART,: (0 T E PRESIDENT ° S PARESITAY DV LOP • ASSESSMENT SHOULD LOCAL PERMITTING PEQI ... ' sI SSFSS sitairtz is ' REQUIRED BEFORE ANY 'P ri" I ' may PHYSICALLY 7.MPACT WETLAND LAT& AND PO b. (2 WOULD, RE QUIRE ,TRESS ENTS .: ORDER TO * STORM Ian* ' UX TS m " •, t IIETZGEtt StMOOL.MILOCATION: , OF METZGER S DEVELOPED IM„,CONMNOTI IN O'° ICEMI TIMED SCUM ^ D7 S CT • . XF "�°' IS ,� MAT R :S .. " LL NOT. BE D, ' s� , REMAIN DEVELOPMENT lisLAN WILL MARE OI CE "OF APPROPRIATE •� I I• K � - SCIOXL FOR TIM CONTINUED ME ATIO ° F NCIN 'ASSESSMENT: 'mamma TR • PO1 /®fit;, PUBLIC FACILITY ER P• REQUIRED BY PHASE, ' I ! EDI G SO C S 1SIBILIm�¢�1 Y4 ��� • 4 • DESIGN GUIDELINES P " IC. IAPROV Y� STA1N.:. DS t SHOWING S DESI " GUIDELINE aa.b�R} OTHER FEATURES" ..:...S, .STANDANDS FOR IIMPROV0 4° MS SUCH S GUIDELINES S INCLUDE 1S:61)S TO ADEQU EL F tuncGmtormootria it id . WILLIAM & TERRY MOORE 80,40 SW GODWIN CT GI4RDEN HOME, OR 97223 FIDAVXT OF y STATE OF'OIEGON County ` of :Waahini city of Tigard _iSc;,,o, mew it;' epoee and `��ays . (Please print j ' That I am a 1 J\&tL �'r' 'f or The City of Tigard, Oregon. That Y served NOTICE OF :; PUBLIC ' BEARING That I served NOTICE OF asCISE©M s City of Ti ard. Plann Director':' g a �9 Tigard Planning Viission Tigard Hearings Officer ' TLgar ... C FGy gounc,il ti c g - Dot a,i��as� of which %/bit 1°A") was mailed to each lanied sOns at ' attached list marked exhibit NB" on the day of said notice NOTICE OF DECISION at 'ztritto attached 'was bulletin 'board , on the day Rill in the UzEited Zt yes Nail on the � da postage prev lid. d. on ` au appropriate, t and depos tcd 19.. �' ,' rn /affirms to me on the Subscribed and sworn /affirm to sae' on the ,r day of 19 9. t1 t8GON Nor c x irea.. F . 46400 0 _TICE OF PUS {%,I. NOTICE IS EEREBY Ga'VVEN THE THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, AT ITS ACTING O%. MONDAY, jgeotenn er l0„ L99Q AT lag PEE', IN THE TOWN BALL ''OF THE TaG4ARD CIVIC CENTER, ' TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER FOLLOWING APPLICATION: OAR1D W g�� BLVD °. , � TI 5 8 x FId NO.: CFA 90° -0006 FILE,' TITLE, a P =es: dente Pax APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: Various ....13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A PUBLIC` iRING� T � ` C AN�3E' THE CURRANT :"PLAN_L DltjwiNATI y the,area ConnaAercial Px Ma , ione1 back to Low► D�►n,eit Reeid ®s e,.3�.a1 gor ed by p "A" and to change the Tigard C . � reheneive Plan' of ®e (po `i .1 to 21 «8.5 to delete text. »xatlic.�;,es 11.8 , • bra eri °yar.a and condition® thitt were to have 'applied specifically tc the rletaid4nt's Parkwa,4 VerSi Renewal District illustrated by Map "B" BONES R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units /:tcrp LOCATION: See att.;,tched map. (See Map On Reverse Side THE PUBLIC ;TEARING ON THIS MATTER, WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDAI 08 WITH THE RULES OF CHAL'TER 18,32 OF THE COM (UNZTY DEVELOPMENT _ CODE AND RULES OF PEccEpuNE tI r. .. .O.. S OF OPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE , AT CITx 'WALL, OR RULES CHAPTER .. INTEREST It�7 !1"H3'B PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER � 18.30. ANY PERSONS HAVING I e �,;ATTEh MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD' `. WRITING TO BB Yy, OR TE87,Ir�NY MAY BE SU81►iITTEI� IN ENTERED) INTO THE RECORD. Y B CITY ItACCI PLANNING D.. ARTIENT AT 4j9=4111, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 8W 1ALL FOR ' THER IN�RMATIObY PLEASE CONTACT CiIE C Bird. T30ARD OP.SOo.�`t(` $ 2 RD�i OR r s . 7 23.' t bkm/CPA90 -0'1. B; : 1! it NI .1116 a. as . oa. 111 =NM a. ' =1_7<tki 2dkirsd`tv 'WM �s :ei" 1'9OS n nillZifi14 =in 11"1— :11.41.-2!' an_ rill, [r; a.. ..•• �! rillfe �•sr N* + #'- Y III .pin - + I =.E ® 4111 ' SOI �i��: e: � + Kok,;,-.11,11, 9� _ RIl1 i l l iY t l ;Intl 4 Sa .Lj ® 4. '1:111 i 1-'- .W a ...i .■ L l.�� a. 1 :/ qua r it i�iQ�� r �tm �� 1� �� ow .. ���n■ �titillilN�' } �{�f • 1s �� am am am'-= �t..14' tla.uraaa j La■ ...Ain /;:mas Irlial a 4 .1Vi..l7. as -:at41LsIiY_- —:I ALialliZEMITO*1.1111111Wil ii I II I 1 - liii"'4-er k VW lallaill ;16yerA rm.. , . I ari 117111-1..19011E billet'? MIMI IL rail W "111;\ la '-' liirl"!•-1111- h7-41.41iFirV5*.41.-41 114' lir Mall ■ ■.1�.11��Y� t� . IIMILMIftWil ,Irx.aq & PEUURIG EILCO 941050 '431'1 OAK OR 97223 I3RAWAND FAMILY PRESERVATION TRUST 1175 SW EgYNN TIGARD, OR 97223. MANUEL BREMCEL 8879 SW LO(7.UST it3T TIGARD, O 97223 GENEE EIRIITTOti CHARLES & 7885 SW OAK ST irtGARbo OR 97223 LE EN & HELEN CFIAVF2 8407 SW : LOCUST . PORTLAND, OR 97223 THELMA C JC c/o EUGENE & VIVIAN DAViS 4550 SW LI MBARD BEAVERIOtl, OR 97005 CLACKANAS II 10300 SW GR EBURN RD #200 PORTLAND, OR 97223 HUBERT & ALICE CLINE'' 4000 14T`s ST S -508 EIVERSIDE, CA 92501' CLARENCE & JEAN _ COLE 8811 SW SPIRLICE PORTLAND, OR 97223 CAW --S-H 10300 OREERG RD #200 PORTLANO, OR 97223 0 W RAtIDY & KRISTINA ab,LI, 8775 SW. ,OAK ST TIGARD, ' OR ' ` 97223 GARY CULLY 10315 SW'. 87TH PORTLAND, OR 97223 HERBERT & CAROL, C ,RTIS 8850 SW TEF:9RN TIGARD, Cit 97223 MICHAEL DALTON 9225 SW OAK ST TIGARD', OR 97223 GENE & VIVIAN DAVIT 4550 SW "GOMBARD BE6VERTUN, CR 97005 MICHAEL & LAURI DAVIE 8535 SW PINE PORTLAND, OR 97223 RICHARD & AUDREY DAY 8504 SW PINE TIGARD, OR 97223 DEPT OF AFFAIRS C/0 KIS ENTERPRISES 700 SUMMER ST SALEM, AR 97310 DARRELL & BARBARA *DICK 6750 SW OLESoN RD PORTLAND, OR 97223 K DAB HILLS 'BRF�NCI IMAM, 972 RUTH DIEHG duo FRED .& HELEN LAIfiRENCE 9225 SW CORAL PORTLAND, OR 97223 DAVID & PEGGY DINUBI1 10455 SGT 90.16 TIGARD, CR. 97223 H & ;MARGARET' DIXON JOHN ..,& MARCELLA DART 1569 CALLIE HACIENDA CF VALLEY, AZ 85614, GOERGE & PATRICK !XX 9770 SW SHADY LANE , TIGARD, OR 97223 MARRY DORTLAP D 101540 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 DTL.T,ZR!!fi INK ► 9520 , SW CORAL POR r.AND, OR 97223 DARRELL & BERTHA DUNF RD d `o DATA CORP , 4a5 NW WAALL ' A PORTLAND", OR .97226 ',a vierf4 EARLS 11215 SW' ,HALL Hi.VA' TIGARD, OR 97223 THOMAS ELLIOT c/o JACK & MARY .BROWN' 10445 SW 90TH ' AVE ¶1IGARD,i OR 97223 DC Lb F ORBES/ . JOHANNES 01020 SW HALL BLVD S--200 PCllt'1'I,•AND, OR 9722,3 SHIRLEY, ALFRED & HELEN C'1 8950 SW OAK TIED, OR 97223 MICHAEL & JANE GOLDADE 8515 SW OAK TIGARD, OR 97223 GOOD SAMA.RITAW HEALTH ENTER.?RISE 1015W22NDAVE PORTLAND, OR 97210 CL & BARBARA GOODE 11405 SW''LOMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 POLAND ',&c MAKII "HAYZLETT 3:1055 SW HALL BL VD PORTLAND , OR 97223 C RLES & DARCIA RING , ... '9025 ' . SW • NORTH DAKOTA,' TIGAPD''r OR, 97223 ELLEN i3[' L d/co RAYMOND & RENEE MCFARLAND 10975 SW NALL, BLVD TIGARD, ` OPT 9722+3 CLIFFORD & BETTX frTh 9175 SW CORAL ST POR"L°GANDL' OR 97223 LBNE RUST ELIZABETH JO[NSON 10940 SW 95TH 8520 , SW ST =am,' OR 97223 PQR°iLAND, OR 97223 ANNE ;TBISON d o JAMES CAIN RT 4 BOX 429 SHERW)O , OR 97140 V CYNTHIA 'IFORD 9970 SW GR,EEN1t3U a RD TIGARD, OR 0223' REID I ORD 10275 SW 85Th TIG ►! J OR 97223 C8E'STER & 11410' SW LOMITA, AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 RANDY , tiNt nT RTH/MIC BELLE RINGS 9330 SW OAK ST TIGARD, OR 97223. ALICE JIVE 10655 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND, OR 97223 THE iVIDS & '`MICHIKO' KDRNH ._:. P,i 8840 ,BOMAII CT TIGARD, OR 97223 -6821 BUNCHHOWN & SOKONPIDOR Mai 10385 SV 37TH AVE 97223 MICHAEL & PAMELA KAY 10905 SW 7 TIGARD, OR 97223 PAUL KL`ICRAM, SENIOE PLANNER THOUSAN ;F/RIENDS' OF OREGON 534 SW !H(IIRD AVE PORTLAND, OR 97204 ALFRED & HATTIE:KINDRICK` 10565 Sill 85TH AVE PORTLAND, OR 97223 a n\ OLORRES�•'L X0984) �719't;� V.* L/A�P'a 8310 :5411 41` ;; GER,' 97223 MP 23 !ENNY &' VIVA L'ARSON. 14465 SW ',12 5TW TIGARD; 'OR 97223, % i tGINY A LEDFORD c/0 GREGORY & JILL 1042 RANDOL'P ! RD C R 970" : WC�ODBURN, ZOOK LENA LENHARDT ET AL Box 117 NEW ENGLAND, ND L8647 GAYLE LEO 10725 SW 85TH TIGARD, OR 97223 KENNETH LEWYS 9780 SW SHADY LA PORTLAND, OR 97223 0 LINOOLN CEN E.'R PHASE IV' LIciITED . PARTNERSHIP 10300 SW GREENS iRG R'b '1200 PORTLAND, CR 97223 1WN CENTER ASS: `• i ;TD. BY n RL OORP. 117 SW TA!LOR PORTLAND, OR 97204 LINCOLN 10260, SWs G BY TRAM± iL CB: C PG► BOX 53996 PC RTLA D .., .9722 LINCOLN II '.NOTH 10260 SW GttEENHURG :RD 7T11 FLR PORTLAND, ' , FOR. `97223 FRANK & WILMA !J T fi,.lkLE & , MARY FAJL 7050 SW GILDS ' RC LAK OSWEGO, OR 97034. & Bi.SSIE WZV NGSTC7 1097- Sw NORTFI , aAKp A TIGARD, n,R 97123 HARRY ;& 8 ER1 rY LCD 9365 SW T XOS9' ST TIGARD, CR . 97 ?23 DAVID °& PHYLLIS tbVII= 20624 i RICIM.C` o LN" BEND, OR 97,102 DELORES LUBERTO► 8880 SSW S;4sUCE TIGARD, CR 97223 8� 2T IKADLA D ST,AR RT 1 ;BOX •208B Fistimx RJ 8IRKBF�i JAMES & DEBRA NARDt 8705 Stt sF ttNOLE AIL TuALAT'IN r OR 97062 LN I, NORTH O !R. P. Matthews, ' Assistant Director l i.storic Pres.' League of Oregon PO Box .40051 ' Portland, OR 97240' O. iD. Maurer 2517 Quebec Eugene, R 97401 Nips Mi l l:s 10G4.41' SW 95th Tigard, OR 9722: Dave Mavva, 9300 SW "' 89th. Tigard, OR 97223 rett 7 Sherrie Mk ?,! 8807,SW Sprcue Tigard, , OR 97223 Louise Mazzuca 10000 SW 90th Avenue Portland, OR 97223 Timothy & Tandy Moore 8910 'Ss/. Oakway Tigard, OR 97223 Metzger, Methodist Church 9055 SW locust Portland, OR 97323 Mrs: William.M 8440 SW Godwin Coir1 Tigard, OR X7223 John & Connie Middleton. 9415 SW Cedar Crest Tigard, OR 97223 Kenneth C. AUa rey 84'x.1 SW 'Coral Tigard, OR 97223 Bruce Miller, Robert £ia Diane Bdicer 949�.� SW Locust Tigard, OR 97223 Douglas , & Tillie 'Murr 9450 SW Lehman Tigard,, OR 97:223 axtnie� ;Noyes 1206 Huhbar; yin : McAtee 039, SW ,Rine Bard, ..Odd ,.97223 P ,rindati Ray nt &' Renee McFarland 10975 'CW Ha11 'Blvd. Tigard, rig 97224 Gregor' & * Ruth Mcwayne 10200 SW 90th Tigard, OR 97223 Gordon & Penny Nas?Y 10231 SW Jefferson Tigard, OR 97224 Oregon, State Dept. of Veteran `ff it , Daniel A. &, 'Char Otte Gook 109 Blvd, 8F- 3243'1. 'Salem, OR 97310 iC Oregon, Ste to 'Dept. of v eteraai A,f A R.B. & Jeanette Wallo'ch •(C- 07‘249) 8890 SW Coval Tigard, OR 9722,3 Alnyccii Osborn 10860 SW 95th' Ave. Tigard,' OR 97223 Dianna Nesbitt 8700 SW Birch Tigard, OR 9/223 Gary Ott 9055 SW Edgewood Tigard, OR 97223 Harold & Doris Ness, 11230 Sw 90t: Tigard, OR 97223 Pa- N�. ;k r...d ..gett 11210 SW 90th Tigard, OR 97223 H. . Newbrey % Dania ` Kennf.th Rasmussen, Et. 10010 SW J'oretisot'4 Tigard, OR 97t23 Pargas' 'bf Portland, , In PO Box 12647 Eresnoi CA 93778 Kenneth Nielsen 11185 STt Nall BlVd. 'Tigard, OR 97223 Riohard & . Narmma 3040 'NE r,�dy Por9.aa,, aR 97. Carl: & Glory a Perry 9)/50 Sw ,Lehmann ;Bt.' Tigard,` `OR 9,7223., Gregory , r .ewe ]l 1' Janet Asia,", 85251. Sill' Oak Tigard, OR 9722- Stephen ;& Lorinda Perry, 9885 SW ' 92nd Tigard, OR 97223 rian' & Kathy Praeger, 9120 !SW Locust 0;6.; Tigard, OR 97223 Jerome Petersen 10010 Sw ball Blvd #17 Tigard, OR 97223 Helmut P. Rae 10170 ' SW 90th: Tigard, OR 97223 Thomas & Mar ' Peterson 9070 SW Coral Tigard, OR 97223, Donvpl.d Ransthe1, S ,David 4050 sW Lombard 'St. Beaverton, QR 97005 Gordon PPkin Samuel. & Janet " Holmes 12215 SW 33rd Avenue Portland OR 97219 Mat; lew 7 Marsha Plourd 9055 SW Oak Street Tigard, OR 97223 George & Jane Ray III 8910 . SW Coaca1;' Tigard, OR 97223 'n .Rasmussen,'' PE 10010 Sw Johrzon Tigard. OR 97223 Donald E. Pollock 10211 SW Barbur Blvd. Portland, OR 97219 Jack Reardon, ``►p Suite 02 Wirmar' Pacific It,�c '9585 SW Washington Square Tigard, OR 97223 Donald Pollock/R. CarPe.te 13570 :IOW Burton Portland, 'OR' 9722 De].Phia Redford 9200 sty' Hall Blvd'd. Tigard, OR 97223;' ren Rice & Lorrain rCal lahah 13200' SW .,Howard Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 Richard , &', Connie 0140 SW Locust Tigard, OR 97223 Phyllis Rouches, Et. Al. 1321 NE Couch Portland, OR 97232 Chirley Rowe Judy Wood 10370 SW 90th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael & Joyce Ruff 12150 SW 124th Avenue Tigard,' OR 97223 sue' IDSTTRCT 13137 SW PACIFIC RWY TIG RD, OR 97223' Bob Samulels 8735 SW Lehmann Tigard, OR 97223 VITA ScL!W IZER 10685 SW 35TEi AVE PC)i tTLAND, at 97223 Joasef Sandor % Edward McElroy, Jr. 4304 Haggett Drive Riverside, CA 92505 eeter Swage 10300 Std 90th Ti ard, OR 97'23 SHELL OIL COMP BY PANO00, . INC. 100 W HARI6,ON, 2 -200 SEATTLE, WA . 98119 JAtCK : STEIC M .1,12 50 3 ; =MUM ►c2I■, OR 97223 MICHAEL SLATTERY /1HEDCRE B BARE 9990 SW GREENBURG RD PORTLAND OR 97223 HERBERT & GEORGIA SLAUGHTER 9335 SW LOCUST ST PORTLAND, OR 97223 EE IOIT 9380 S"AT , 82it POIRZ'LA gDr OR 97223 maim & Ro Bra TIPPLE 8805 SW OAK TIDE ), OR 97223 DENNIS ;��CATBLEEN i MR. & CLARENCE; TERMS 300 SW ,' CJARAL ST '0403 SW OAK TTa1ttRDn '!b t 97223' TIGAE2D OR: 3 7223 DAVID & LINDA '1OZER ETAS & � ' , . � s 8770 SW T.1104.N ST TTG D, OR 97223 PORTLAND,' OR 97223 NANCY TRACY 7310 sal PINE ST TIGARD, CDR 97223 VI" JOftNW 1JAY 9145 SW L10RTH DAKOTA , ,„ $14- 01K ST . , , „ •", ifiG41',,17409,,,OR',',97223.,' • ••, ,, • JAMES ''.1;YEHE''WATil3N,',r.'',..', 1,' .'..'''' , jACQUELINE '1;,, Titti:.00 .. , , , • . ; , , . . . .• •,..• ..... • ,.., ,,.. .'';:?0'.'401411:t .$4k.,$1% .395: .' ..'' ' ',..' 9245 .SW.' ttitstilti00$. pit, .:. 'vtAitUki .111J:.. 967.34:.. l'„,,,, . ..• 'iP,C)011,1$13■,.OR..'0703',-:;',' ...,;,. ,, .. ,•-,,,,,...,.., .. :,., ,': ., .,-, -,..,-; ,;„;,,, ,,„ •,,.., ,, ' ' ' ' - ' ' - ,,,,,H, ,.. , ...,, . . v. , ., •,. .• --, ,,,,,• ' • ' t. , . ' . . ' . , , . H t . , JAtiPki% Z . ' 011I , Vitt f; -ElNiftr ',4EONNIE WEISS :', ..., • • ... „....... ., , . .. , 7505 SW'''atESTVIEr4t;,or...... '. 20822. 'bEADIal,A,t4es cR, • SARATOGiki. 'CA '95070, ..,.' .11pAltD,-;QR.'' 97223 PATRICIA WHITING, CHAIR CPO #4 comma 8122 SW SPRUCE TIGARD, OR 97223 JEFFEREY & ANITA WHITTAKER 9125 SW NORTH DAKCIL'A TT.GARDe OR, 97223 ( ' q Washington County, Oregon aortae or FINAL ORDER - BY crag wail= • Concerning Case 'Nustbe:r(s):E&Mt'gggl__.____ Nam. of Applicants —ciLt_tLJL‘suisL_____________ . AddreeL 25 SW Hall Blvd. City ward State OR Zip 22.2.21.,_ • Address of Property: • r _•,.• _It _ _ t w t iJLC_rtina s.ctIjs t Tax Map and Lot No(aa).: • Request: To change the current plan designation from ' ettermircial Professional back to. Low and Medium Dens.ity, Residential fOr the area illustrated by Map "A" and to ichanae the Tigard _ Comprehensive Plan text (policies 11.8.1 to 11.8.5). to delete the criteria and conditioLts that were to have applied specifically to the President's Parkway larbat Renewal District illustrated by Map "8".' ZONE: R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 unite/acre). 6. Actions Approval as requested Approval with conditions Denial 7. p.pticoi 2401=ioe v'as Published in the newspaper, Posted at citY HiI, and mailed to: The aplicant and OwnetsY, X Owners of record Vi't114111'. the required distance The AffeCtetNeichbOrt196d Plannitt‘fi Organization X Affected governmental agencies TIIE DECISION WA SIGNED ON AND Bticomss Berivrivii ON ,, .. .. .. .., . ... . . ,.. The ' adopted findirigit of fitdt, deCifaibit, and, ‘StateMetat L'of ' Condttioht :Can, be .., , , . ., . Obtaineid from the 1,,iantiinct Department; '',,rigatel cii..1tH Haile 1312E SW Hall, „ , P.O. Box 23391 Tigilied, OregOn 97221.' . A review of thiii, ,tiedisiOrt may be Obtained by tiling a Hntit.tidi Of ,,ifiteint,,,, Wittl, the Oregon Land Use 80ard cf.' ,Apijetil.fs ' (L88;k.), according 't.O.' thole' ., .. .„... . .... _,.. procedures. ' , " ' ' ,' ' ' HI , ' , ',''' ''' 'H , ,' , ' .''' ' ' , 9. 0ESTIONS: If you have any question, 1)/ease call tile Isit(itrd City Recorder at 6394171. bitSVCPA90-.06.131(14 I ' n I P. A _ rlIUI two -",;17111111113 11111 : e .� WIN Boundary for the Conaeptual Development plan arua. r im .l1+,w +OUCL. x .e.s to A!i —aw. 1lilk` r' jas s stE!. i1Rt ' l fm i - s.a 99 :WI - Ease :1 #: 'am ,• �� _4 asp >: sasm MI.— . =s. 7-_-; "1111i11Hrs aa.aT �? ®;+ i_ ■ =® t� ►� w rc_ lorwille en! �- ..ate. 4111111mmiresammintif 116 wwwiew II aa.s � 1. •` ®aui ;eo.. ,a 1 4wi111a4#'''rr� °,) ifit: = 1.;,, MIS 7 ■Yj'A. L 'JOHN & DORarilY CHEPIN 8911 'SW OA1K ST TIGAP4), OR 97223 f ROBERT si LELA. CIIRISTENSEZI 8870 SW ■COrtikt 711(;MID, OR 97223 t DICf1AEr� DAALTCt4 1225 SW OA's ST ¶Vtr,ARD., OR- . 97223 GENE & Vi',VIAN DAMS 4550 SW tJ'riARD DS6i1F.2'IC I , CR 97005 iiICHAAL & LA,V 8535 SW PINE PORTLAND, OR 97223 YICD & AuDREY ' DAY 8504 SW PINE TIGARD, OR 97223 DEPT OF VETERANS AFPAIPS.. c/o KIS E T2ERPR.ISE'3 700 SUMN ST SALEM, OR 97310 DARRELL & BARBARA DICK (0750` SW otESON RD PORTLAND, JR` 97223 ;UblE)S; „ 1 SEURL [ i ALFRED & HELM 8950 SW OAK TIG RD . OR 97223 ROBERT & ;RSE; HEINT 11275 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 ELLEN murzEt. d o RAYMOND & RENEE I 10975 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 D �' taurer 2'1,7 r 'Quebec `z^ Eugene , OR 97401 Dave Marva 9300 SW 88th Tigard, OR S724 Louise Maz 10000 SW 90th Avenue Portland, OR °7I22' Metzger Methodist Chure 9055 SW Locust , ;iortland, OR. 97223 John & Connie Middleton* 9415 'SW Cedar ,'Crest Tigard, OR 97223 Bruce Miller . tobert Mai Cane Baker 94a9� SW Locust Tgard,'OR 97223 Douglas`' `TU l e Murr 11�C1Sn u � �� 9450 Sid M , Tigard OR 972 3 ,P i 1 VIRGINIA, LED 00 GREGORY & JILL ZCll 1042 RANDOLPH RD WOODB URN, '' (3R,. ` 97071 LINCOLN =TAM ASSOC. BY WRL CORP. 117 ''SW TAY ma'am, OR 972+ 4 PAUL KETCH4M, SENIOE PLANNER THOUSAN FRIENDS OF OREGON 9230 SW 534 SW THIRD AVE I PVRTLM W ( .T, 2 PORTLAND, OR 97204 ( "' ALFRED & HATTIt3 KINDRICK 10565 SW 85TH AVE PORT AI OR ` 97223 Gregory': &,,,Ruth Mc Wayne 10200 SW.90th Tigard OR 9722,3 11230 Sit 90th Tigard, OR 9722 % Darla & Kenneth Rasmussen Jerome, Petersen 10010`Sw Hall Blvd. #17. Tigard, 011'97223 T'homat & Mary . Peterson 9079 SW Coral ° Tigard, OR 97223 Gordon P.pkin % Samuel & Janvt . Holmes 12215 SW 33rd'' Avenue Portland, OR ;97219, Mat;tihey 7 .Ma 'esha Plourd 90,55 SW' Oak Street Tigard, ;.OR 97223 Donald E. Pollock 10211 SW Barbur Blvd..; Suite 202 Portland, OR 97219 Donald .Pollock /R C 13570 NW Burton . . Portland, „,OR 97229 :4' Art Phyllis , 'touches, 1321 NE Couch Portl %141, OR. 9723 ^hirey Rowe z ;tea ARA Judy food D370 3W 90th Avenue y Tigard,'' OH 97223 Michael & , Joyce. Ruff 12150 W 124th Avenue Tigard, OR C.*7223 Bob S amue is 8735 SL LehMann Tigard,- OR 9722: Jozsef Sandor % Howard McElroy, Jr, 4304„ Haggett Drive Ri rside, CA 925 05 Peter Savage �° : rho 10300 SW 90th d ,i l.• rl, W �' t J I I,r„ 6 Tigard, OR 91223 4. :SEATTLgt 1285 .S07 7 S ELTL COIL COMPAN! BY PAN000, INC. 100 W HARISON 2-=200 SEATTLE, WA 98119 DOMINIC' Ni HELEN SIT d= '5520 ST . THORI' TIGARD,'OR 97223 JIM SITZMA 1 FIRLD REP . DID' 1175 COURT, ST r NE SAL E.111., OR 7310 --0590 MI( `.EL SL ATTERY /TIHELIORE B 999'O SW GREENBURG 1 D PORTLJINO OR 97223 - HERBERT & GE RGIA SLACK+ 7 9335 SW LOCUST '' ST POR'TLAND, OR 97223 ROGER & JACQUELYN 8935 SW TIGARD OR 97223- HCA1 .15 LOZOT AaN1 EL6 1/$9M$ '1v$ ani IDP ezz46' ':11 9 MS 'OSOG 4911291144AP SIMI -"*"""17< , f714.5 p !ONO* I ittotiVis. EZZL6 ..iativpis O; MORI 14.9 01.12 NaZal vcmri 5 arAv(i 4113t,IVOIZL r " O�R1JNA 4, S96 Y3 ":"'C,...1it'VJA111110vS, ' ietsst xoe oat xut7o ..,possv vta.„0/*. abina assitr.t.r...!s)$ 311/S. LIVID. , • . . • • „ , „ , , „t scassiktv!i',', HENRY & BONNIE miss 7505 SW CREST'VIV;W ST TICARD, (( 97223 ALAN ZMINTBAUER ' ET AL AkTTN . EIZ L SHYDVA REAL 3055 3W ,i°AIRW11. ` DR FOI'LA', Oil 97225 DAVID WtLWSF:. 8700 SW BO ER � 99�t� SW 9 f 1M PORTLAND, OR 97223 FO i, PATRICIA 'WHI'T'ING , CHAIR CPO #4 ME TZ= 8122 SW SPRUCE TIGARD, 'CI 97223 A Ai JEFF:.:. ., Y` EREY ' & ANITA WE�II TTu 9125 SW NORTH DAKC ?A '1°Zs OR 9722, and Use Boar rA 44— peaks 00 'nigh : tree, S . E' , Suite a:1 em, OR 37310 ear LUB Referees: I auf writing on behalf of the City of Tigard to ,'indica concurrence in Petitioner's Motion to' Dismiss Appeal ry V truly yo u s r r ab imo rely : -. V w Ram'is TVR/ l f aN\lkbalti cc: Mr. Kerrie Stanalee Mr. Gareth S. Ott Mr. Henry! Fine k:r. . Donald J lia'clonan Mr. Pat Re ,lly (w/encl. " Ed 1a irphy (w/enc . ) Tigard City Council.' (wJenc 1. TIGAR Respondent. The ri)etitit:Iners„ joined by the respondents, the C'ity:, are requeSt 2:11BA Case, No. 90-049 be dismissed. Both the Petitioners end the resPonciell volcarttetri'l,y make ttlis.*r.equest bec.„1!.t.ise the rge,s1r)ondent hes made an)endments, to 1.11e city of Tigard comprehensive plan which make the ppeal unnecessary. The r)etitiltiners, jt.-t'ilted by the respondInts, request the petitioner be refunded any and all depoilts and .payments made, in conjunction with this,aprseal.. This Motion is dated the 28th day of Novetn1)1r, 2990. iseini7oner ,e „ , 1. CO CD` • 1 A CONSENT AG A.. • istrict` Approve City Council ' I mit e: Jul y " , and 2 3 , "1990 Receive and File: Council, Calend Local Contract Review ,Board : Award`�:Rids . • a • Greenburg Road Storm Drainage Improvements b.` Greenburg Road ..and Locust Sireet Traffic Signal c i i,'coln Street and Lust 'Street Local rmDrovemen . 1990 Major Maintenance Program 5.4 Call for Public Hearing �- ' Sanitary Sewer Easement vacati. 90 on - on Lot 7 of A a Downs Subl9tvision' - Resolution. Sa .5 Approve Appointaents to various Orgeni,zations - Resolution No.. 90 , Authorize City Administrator to Sign Agreement ,for, Goya erro.nent Access Production Services with Metropolitan Neighborhood Planning' Are a Cable Communications (MI CC ) Motion by Councilor laden, .approve ,the, -Conse atx.Aganda., seconded by Counoilcr Johnson to The motion was approved by a unanimoi s vote of Council presetit. :I I It" lR OMB &; iusc0!IN1iit'I'�►i" "r:'" m t The City Council. +will hoi �l a publie hear ing to �de�; ermine ¢ course o active regarding la d use within the a#aa ,► ev oUs1y `.4 ppuTMoa..pl oc s ed as n President ■ s Parkt �iqy Urban Renewal Djstric' , n , hearing is required by Tigard Compru hensia This P1an,, olicy 11. which states, "'If for a1 �y reason the res 15ent''s� D ay Devel�c'pment Plan is not adopted or approveeii wi tAin 9u days of sUCh ';t decision (June ;U, 1990) , the Tigard "City; Council sI 11 hold ° pu lic hearing in order to re- evclluatc� the pOIi es note+ above (the i ple�aer! °.ing polio es) and the s o�i�areh y �s ve Plan Amendment `(which ohanged al land use "esignations inn the "area from Resj�cder tial to Conte +,�rci Proaj ess ,onr 1) '. Public hearing was opened. Declarations or Challenges: Mayor Edwards; atated t he does business with y.a_, +sp ' th Tra�ell Crowe ; and he leases in the. Trammell Crowe Lincoln Five Blinding , which , .s 1 a part of the Urban' Renewal. However,' .he said' h wo`u be impartial in hearing this matter. City Atto cney swiss advised th t . the issue aeIng de li de g was a narrow .one , " ,the issue was : Show t 1e council. ini "t: iat� :. , .., ,� eGf�ln a tha.s m ` � c e� the lhe�ring procedure c c0ul lead t th'e repeal of the `Comprehensive Plan and zo" h � w ich has previous)!. been placed on 'thy; es1 Parkway property. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES A thagiSt • P -x TA r, ire o le were originally ,p Parkway, d!.i'Ve vpao�ent. , Ho ever. a apparent i:hat' Via, would be a ancia] some 'of the residents 'of the'' aireat' '. oppose the project ehe'also`addresee ,mpact . on Hall Bou le , � Y�`""'�;�.� to the Tigard data's travel aloe e ,, g the �sec'1�;; 1 a d ".NMii�� 'il she lives. She suggested pressurin soly ng the problem ' b ' hate l la- and :905 �?W dgedi'ood, Tigard'," �a oke ppA � . sit' of :,t �il ;initiating' a Co m de lPl2n map amendment :tO 'change; the p lan' i nation � ,gnation v; the proposed President's Parkway <v oment arr a • from Commercial= Profe�Sa oval '' back to' . Lo -'; dens ty Res+,identia , ' and ",to , resci�:. t e • policies acioptva in 'the ComprrehenE lye ; "Plan text. Hey testified. the change to onn leYreia - professional zoni�ilg .was a v �, ate .w t' t considerion s of t e requirements' of 'gala ::-Without the condiaeratien of 'the W goals., especially goa�:e direct ed at traff,40:0 air,, and ' water quality. In addition, he commented ,that the City did :not ' demonst ate the r4e�ed for more (:ornmerciali '` ;,zoned land. He toaid he ` f &wored adopting the - teji*, from the Metzger /Progress i ommuni.ty Plan into the jCity's` Comprehensive Plan, and he suggested 4000ritioratinsfl. the wetlands and open ,space designation en ,.the , Plan map. Ken Beck, 8820 SW Thorn i and �1r� a fact that the citize*� . did ';get to pp�e�c aced the. fad attend he ari. ngs p e r taixin g to o the en rs Parkway issue . He suggested that the city de mote input fro m �.. area residents prior to deciding tin issues in the future. He urged City Council to proceed with process to re-designate the' area as Residential. Pat Whiting, MPO #4 chairman, Urged +ounoii to. in text a o the Pealid ntial designation and to re of t the Metzger - Progress Community P7�'aI into the City's Comprehensive Plan. ; , ; Terry Moore, 8440 per ��adwin Ys... of CPO ' � (Garden ' Home- gale Planning Organization). She repo voted t v� return the area of 1 Presie Int "s Parkway ,back to Tow- densit elesgnati ttR1, and to adopt t the tt h etzger -.PAtbgress omrunit P a i CoMprehensiye 1„it ice" Julie i'`' ,4, ... heed . -. . , , , Tigard. 1 ' 1,-,S I') 0 10 . , , , Comprehensive Plan baei to Residential clef; \at. , ..„ Dr. Davis,. 10875 SW 49th, supported changing th Comprehensi Plan back, tg Low-'density Residentia 'designation. , ouncil. Questions or Comments: Legal Counsel Tim Ramis responded to questions pertaining to the actions coverced by the resolution. Be advised that the only :action before Council was to initiate the bearing,,, Public hearing was closed. Con,si.leratiori by Council Council agreed Septerither 10 would be tbe date set for a joint meeting with City Council and the Planiing v" Commission. RESOLUTION If°. 90-51 A RESOLUTION 'IV INITIATE A COMPREHENSIVE. PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE ARM PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED AS T1111! PRESIDENT/5' PmcWAY UMW; RENEWAL • 0010011.1■Or. ij:011r1 OP, moved, it et 40 • k. Motio carried by a unan imous vot3 4 Council. • PUBLIC BEARING - Ciliint1f122181-V31 PLikS itkIEND'ARIT41/2A 96-0004;' zo CliitaGit ZON 90-0002 BINGIUDI/SPIEKIER (tiftVil,f5) A request for approval of tit Comprehensive Plan Tszendatuit to change the land ,laseldesignation fro 1,1" Xbdugtriail' to Gene Commercial oimmerc,..1.a.f. an d to, change "tat.',A!,,t, 'dettalignittioir fre!)it rii-L to C-G. LOCATIC)N: Between PrrP Ireo, - 5 and south to the Oregon 444;ln and Ititeriltate e regon,Busitm,a0 (II 452.. 13 AD Lot 7,700) Public hearing was ipened. ' neolatations or chelleng0s: There vOte'lnimma cl'a) Summation by cotinuflity Dititriali,olmett Staff Seni or Planner 1ith t4en didPlaYed maps stowiirig location of the subior.t property' and tbs, sturt°, areas and their Contkierisive Plan deaigri,itt..o cIT/' COUNCIL NEETING NINUTSS AUGUST 13, 1990 -',PAGE 6, I " ■„. , „ , „ r e l v motion was approved by a unani 130,1113 vote resent. iM� 4r �F. I I. r11 yv�n ^••.4 11frUj�4 ix 1 *.r r > V I M'n 15,111':•1 flK yLz p 1 7 0i rr '... 4 • 7�MyAi A public, hearing to change, the current "flan designation Commercial Frofes +;�ional back ; to Low and . Medium - Denisi tY; Residential 'and to chanve the P gerd : Comprehensive Plate tent' (Policies 111-.8 .1 to 11-8.5) to delete the cr' t r . and conditions that were to have app1:.4 . d specifically to the proposed Presidents Parkway Urba `.' Rene n wal District.' a. Public hear: lig was opened by Pl i ann n Co who pe , Y' . g� Commissioner Moen why also coaled the Planning Colmnission meeting to orwar. (?lanni y ag Coaumission attendance is noted above.) :b. President, Moen read a statement which adviesed that meetings of the Tigard Plain'^ ing Commission are governed by provisions of Title 2 of � the Tigard Municipal Code and ORS Chapter 227. Under` I those Vtatutes. , certain standards . are established for the conduct of public meetings President Moen reviewed the public . hearing format. c. Staff Report. �~t. pca Senior Planner Bunch reviewed the issues before the Council and Commission. (see staff report which has bsen filed with . Council meeting etirg material Planner summarized the Vcitizen inv olvement and notification ific ation process. He outlined the satisfaction of the appropriate Statewide Planning Goals and City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies and City procedures. the ree re'`p°r'ted.he Planning Commilssicn recoeended oen r sal Q�. �� decf si.e�in on tie ;;land use deaf ° anon o f res en the Presidents Parkway �a'cea, Planning Commis on disc recommended initiatl:I on of a planning , ,effortl to deve is an area this recommendation would require 1 oggr an g e p hnnix� to staff w >r tload' constraints. Commissioner. Pessler asked about Plain ,Policies Conc �.s� Sens i ti rre . i an4s/ifetla nds . Senior Planner Basch reoponOed. that p r hen lve Pl.. n .;: ute othee n s fina"l Y a Pero ab t Plan language wsonuetls . a d ► h �t�►��;�oate a (Council will he consi derang amendments sections in the Comprehensive l naar�nornct . i Plan Commissioner Barb +:r noted on page 20 parag•aph Staff Report the language noting passage of aresolut .o g Commission ..: mi on yAU t 1 was in('o +ct b... the Pla�a.na C+�mmi�sion o The resolut >.on was passed by thl. City -.. �oiinc. il. rre i CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES +s , PPTEMBBB 0 =► Phi E, pr Troy Vanderhoof,. 10181 SW. Jefferson, Tigard, Oregon read a letztesr into the TItcord. (Letter was eubmitted\and is on file the C4)urtcilu meeting material':,) Mr. Vaulderhoof ulged e3cpeAitious action 'Changing the comprehensive map art " text designations . from Commercial/Professional back to „the: ori4inai. Residentiall designations., Mr. Vanderhoof referred to development occurring in the area which was contra to iis ' understanding of how tbe process was to work. Mayor explained that delrelopment c Lincoln -atimtet was not within the area of urban renewal. The'reAsoir for the joint Council/Planning Commission attesting was to speed ' up, the legal procesd for this issue. ' Mr. Vanderhoof et)qlressed is concerns with regarzd to number of meetings which have been held since the Vote to turn down the tax increment financing request. • Gary Ott, 9055 S.W. Edgswood, Tigard ip Oregon' ,sUp the comprehenSive Plan change as 'presented,. He said, original Plan change process did nta)t adYiress the goals or the Tigard Code regarding viivironmental impact He advised that it was a dangerous concept to assume the highest and beet use of residential land change it to commercial. He urged .`", the City incorporate the Metzger Area Plan into the plazmii efforts for this area He reVested an , Open Spac designation for Ash Creek and wetlands in the area. d• il. f f a; Epler, x'8845 S a t the testimony sheei wev " ,= 'i�i�r' .ai'1� 'Davis, 10875 S.W. t 89th,' support of the Comprehensive .P transp 6rtation problems as the 'she noted problew3 personally e to develop in, t area gene Davis, +1.0875`• S.W. on the { .nstimony sheet ec Oregon any: A.dment: .# as,is 'r. car liar me ienc ad wit 89th, . Tigard but was unavaa a +Oregon, s, :gne 1 e: to testif vise -B t k, 8820'v,S.W. horri,' Tigard; . Orregon, ad supported the Compreh,Onsive Plan ?men, a nt. there was no room for commercial, `growth neighborhood 1f Ken : Beck, 8820 S. name appeared on declined to tnsti:fy. wised, s .. , She, sail. in ' her • ' aorn,i Tigard, Oregon.' -: Me• & the► tastimony`. 'sheet; however William , J. Moore, representative c %,',', C9 > Fcc �;,��.�aHills`/arden' 'Mama area) , 8440 `'S I W riGaunt, G r den Home, OR 97223 read a letter into the reoord.$ ( The: letter is 'r on file with the ueet,i ngr material.) The 'C the. City 60i ,in,,, char e+ the str�±n���.y recommended � that,' g comprehensive plan map resignations, it the Metzger. ►o0, area from Commerci. 11' Protessiona1, •to Medium, >,r rend ,how" Tielisity Reaident Lal „r F rther, the CPO• `wa ged wee cou�ncf lq to adopt the tex& of the. Metzger -P yogi esi mn Cc unit P'1an relating to this area as Comprehensive , fl, an poly c? e accompanying these plan designations :4 i` • ' Te1rry Moores, 8440 S.W. r dwin Court encouraged the Counc>i3, mad Commissiofi to sup,+ reversal of the decision to' amend the COni rehenelVe. 'text changing the i desigL;ation of this land area Commercial, Professional., She m'eges u ted a plank ng of fc be initiated, to develop an area plan which , would • use . I Metzger - Progress Plan as the bas IS to 'evaluaut to land use and development opportunities. She said her understanding of the uilxl '� 24 Planning comet ss action, that they intended the `, M0.tzger ' i'0 munity Phan rect.-amended to be i,ncorporited in m tie Comprehensive Plan; otherwise, , there - would b since there was no tee, addre€ sing thisc are requested the Metzger Community- Plan be wider staff es recommendation. Mrs. Moore said pia ix on hold i1idefinitel t. for, the area s; e, referred to CITY COUNCIL ' MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER LOU. urbane k V 9 snc' cited from; writtia.*�:F" �� articles !. concerning F;t;c: ded elopm�`nts . This w� oul d provide an area.: to live, an � 1 �r without., F►,� rely3Hg on, auamobizes . She no,.ed K wh near business and development occurring in ,the 'area whi l will bring more traffic``.' era the 'said rit was sib erraneouc�� thought that �the residentie land i t being h old ", for "future, commercial u ae • is was not the goal .of the . Oregon 'land use plan mod; .� the said ,� �W dividoid the city in Which would eve' the Sta�tt� 11i4hway/ ' 'Department become ' mo;re evident if . :}wilds the highway out to six .lay! �', She st ggested the City " take *thi z opportunity and . mild on Hall Bot levarb� pedestrian /bicycle, low densit neigbborbood= commercial link between *his area ,down to th. C�; ►ic ;., center area and. Main Street. she advised and outlined some elements oz a an for the N et zger /i` 3hbrook :arcs whichi ' :r: id be put together within n the next couple of, years. T AilhloCks. 9200 S.W. , 'St ,e. gard, Oregon d istributed o %ap �outlini�r�g propertty^ owned by , . wee people (imap is on file wits Council meetin K material. . He requested this land be exempted from any` changes in' the Comprehensive Phan. This way, they would be in a position where to seek and obtain funds o perform the studies neceWsary to r i det ne what . can be. done thia property. The Metzger l in ssxs' therm shah id be .a plan in t o area fora fix of , reeider tial and :A0omOiercial. The property owr ars are considering a development Heai,c�en d�abl'uiwrt h�e ieict .h :. . .Mw� � oo uutxll. 1 d inc wear psi dential project n the, led, not t un der the ou�rent d+�� development would; requite a higher density. Funds are available groin the State to entourage the type of pro j eot they would propose . , John Blom e. n .P4,60 Stet, T 1- Ar $490 advised he was testifying as a. ,e1�r of C which ` would ;g "+Metzger , P .ar ; Cr . ''Blear an 40t4r1 Any residen is i :this area stet ab ►ut e r a o anA; a1 t''dat time they did ' rot Waint commeroia development in this area. lomgren reviewed his concerns ver tra added f iq weed tehat the transportation em ,for are must b a e H4 :' reiterated his suppoxt fc r the pro se Plan amendment: CITY CGtiACIL MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER Jw rr mprehei d Kerrie Standlee, 102 , he °wound' dike to As a ort the' proposal as'', p esen however, 'ha *a� testifying yr n>>' opp iti on `because timeliness. originally tie `compreh !ns ve "Phan char was made. by , he :`Cou! . eu Commission as , a' l:e is at ve delc s . �. According; a' Tigard ; dunicipal Code "Chapter 18. 0.030, he Com asi should hear this utter''" on , a c� ert�.:tn time 'PO edule .' o of the origins . complaints .wad not heariing this, ',specified in the ',00d, . , ;He requested ' ai t' the.,.' extended until tph43'00 tober city "Counc . meetin then be in: support, " o ±' the ,request cit Attorney advised he hays ,dielcussed th is,' i asue with, Mr. Standlee. Mr. Standl ee s a t ,was that the; Council and the Planning, Ca mm3ssi were limited t1mes of the . year during , *, which, they could ' consider :aaaendments to the'Comprrehensive P]; n. e Co,uncil when, w thy originally conside :red the. 'process, decided" that the. Council tainud the power , to waive 'those. tiaea� limitations and they^ did so 0aiv3. 'Upon. that basis Council proceeded originally ,e nd'`the process cd,ntinues upon the sane theory. ,;,The 'ordinances orirginally.adopte' L estab if shed and +called for the,: process as was 'now beinq followed.', ' Based.. , on these tW' , considerations, the City Att orns said .it was us . y , j " tf �.iab]:e . 'to proceed:.. city Attorney said he had advised Mr. .F tandl ee that : if the,.:' Land lase Board of Appeals disagreed with this posltia 1, the process would be started 'over again. At this point,, the City Attorney advised that he thought the; . Council i t original interpretation was correct and supportable,. ii:;,oirauunity, Development Dir tor advise d of two letters received, es y ' str3 bute� s written te�s,�imon which weave n s. the council Via. snd Planning Ccmm are o Cc luiabia p b bb, w` h was s .gn e a dated' August , 3? Matz 9�►o Group - Sierra Club laic e Coin rehensive Pl _Z en 1, Tr • David � P . on a1L ° �r �� h poor �ei� tai �mel'it`1nrl�en�t .. Club ' ur9ed the Cgti-y to carry .otit the r approprrats s y , ,-y � . . local n anal si.s not ®n,a. in terms +�:� local eeds any pro ioraals, but also in relation to regional struc cures and plans , before taking action On.. Comprehensive Plan modifications for' this a e i rea cr lsewhere am Tigard. { . 'r 11 )e -Land Oregon, Ltd. represented;' iauc c: of the law firm Schwab W lliamsorm' w r dated September 10 , 1990) The lettez a re support tot trie Comp ilensiVe Plan ienidment: CI ,]f. COI CIL : NEE1.IN , lum J.ES EPTEKBER lb, 19 v tk • Recommendation b; Comm, ' ounity Development Did uYd staff reconmenaat.o;�` 3viewed. ivelop nen' -or t; summarized the ' gprs oposal ,r Tea end map c aane waere 1+ e, suggested a see e on be: dded to , the � ®�d�.nance which calls for immediate passage; (emergency Clause) to pro ; Lde immediate Jaf f ee tive peas 'of the Ordinanc , it pr�� ei 'b the Council. Weirdi i g would be its follows: "section. 3. The . Cownoil declares'', an emergencil an directs that this ordinance shall be . off ectivei u ' its 'execution by the Mayor' N" The staff ' did not recommend ad ling' the Metzger, Plan ''owls and objectives at this time nor' did staff recor ott, requirement to initiate a ,Comprehenei ie° ,Plan ing prciCecs for the area. Staff` does. not agree with: Pte. c'k'that this would be the appropriate time to keep the area he sp► cifi� d as Co ercial Professional : :and. As a propoial.: staff roiay, agree with M 1 b.:■ Ck . but this was nbt the appropriate time to consider i!this . suggest i ort. commissioner Pyre asked why .staid "dig.` not want to tae the' Planning Commission recommendation to initiate he planning effort : in this area. Also, would. there be, `. ongoing effort to adopt the Metzger Community flan. %.0 the Comprehensive P16.1 at some point in thy.. futurt:i s Commun " ``ent Director- . advit e4 the future �.t i� evelo p� planning process should not be .i this o rdinai<oe because the scope of such a study wet, unknown: i.e. who shtkuld ` pay for it., who should do it, etc. May issues. shoul l be thoroughly discussed. The Presidents Parkway development '...t rsquired studies; however, a source r of revenue �, ies was also identified. �`i'� :. c� mtb to pay for t?,�_ stud a directive would not be appropriate . in thief ordinance which was a ilegislatii e directive. Tn response to CcyUtissi .ter s mmunity ment Director ad `` d sensitise: "Olds Develop v�aed k�eti��ds�� >>+�n � � .. ,Zo r r addressed under,, the same roc..d �re s e�. area would b� ,� pro thr es to cutiinead in the Comprell ensi ye Pla�: for all such arc_as withi t'- the City bs undari'ass . President not iI Moen, ed 'that whews area was 't: °t+ught i n o T the City of g ►rd; siriilar .and designationi4 ! as' assigned when iii ilashingtoit Cotint' were used. He naked it ' there were any specif is iteT , ''which thfa M+Ietzge. Plan' mfg .t address for this area. GG' COJNw C�� Cl ... ' ME,E' :LNG MINUTES SEPTEMBER 0 r 1440 PAGE ,11�, N 1 to • cte community Developan3nt `„areptor s vieed there „has 'been no special planning effort fc„ this ' area since annexation. foals `.,. and policies :of'., the City' 'o a call would :Apply. Pulbl1— hear ling waaG c.1osed ,Commis wion comments: CO ;,'�it_F`issioner fie said it i port tut I at ®, at some' point in time, tine . Metzger ^ommumity ' Pig and Tart �e incorporated into tie . Comprehensive Pl.aA r. If it was, not appropriate :to add the language into this 'Ordinance which wor tid, specifically direct initiation of the planning effort, then he Suggested wording which, would say, °consider a ..initiation of a planning effort." effort.''v He advised he would he in' favor of the ordinance 'with the addition of consideration of initiation of a pl,Anning effort for the area. Commissioner Fessler advised she ,was in agreement with the ordinance. The Planning Commission' needs written, wp-'to -date) guidelines in order to address sensitive and wetland areas for pending development,' She said she would also Pike to see the appropriate text of the Metzger Plan be included in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Commis Oioner Boone said hey was in favor of the proposal as was previously, reviewed by the Planning commission,' commissioner Barbe:*c advised her decision did not ,change from her stance on July 24: Planning should be started for the area using the Metzger-Progress Plan as a basis to evaluate future land lase. She sale, she was in favor of the ordinance with additions of the itsnnergency clause Commissioner Castile , said a plan for the area '. should be de] oiled to study the traffic flow and elrainage ' flow. If no study asp com,. leted the area would de``elop in a piecemeal faehir,n While he did not necessarily suppo. Ii rdo. the Metzger Plan, he advised the Plan could be Used as a basis for examining the area to devise ; a new Plan° e advised he Wass in favor of the ordinance. Prc silent Moen advised he was in favor of the pr'dposai. Nsn noted the City n er cook: an obligation to the co saunity to go forward on residents par ay plan if' approved by the Voters. Sine the voters ;. turned down the plan, it became the obligatiot or the City, to rescind t e Comprehensive Planning designation,, CISV cotTNcIL MEETING MINUTE r SEPTEMBER 1 O s 19 4 ,d �4 I ]President '.Moen agreed that it was ca intent 24 Planning Commission` ^, decis,ion to recom]nenc ^the City . initiate a planning effc rt to . develop an area plan, using the Metzger Progress Plan as the basis " to develop . a new h. Commission recommendatiofl Motion by Commissioner Pyre .p ' seconded by Commissioner Castile, to , forward the ordinance to the City Council with the recommendation for approval as written. he motion was approved resent. yawl= mc vote of Commission Motion by Com aissioy er •Barber, [seconded ' by Commaisslion\ ^er Fessler, to reooraW►ond to the City Counc :U >, that pl n ^il�, g be started for :his area,. wi i h would have ^been`' . Presidents Parkway, using the . 1 tzger7ProgreSS Plano as _ .:basi,s tG e va lat and; develo ° u use and policses. a plan fog fu�tre iand .740 amotion was vote of Coman3ssion ,nrqsellt4. Consideration by Council: Councilor Kasten noted be supported '; tho Comprehensive lusion: of the , emergency clause, Plan l.�inenc�amemat wig �.nc ;:�ergen ..y' He noted review of testimony recei �i tomz fight:,, est .moa y from past meetings, > anc comments from residents in the - City �.. the support was nearly UnanimOus to return Lgoning to the pre - Presidents '..parkway such as wetlands , rezoning, portions of the^ arena^, o►r whether or not ti inOluc a tine text of . ' he Itet zger- ProgreSS Pl. should be considered separately. . Councilor ohn�n noted har ' a eeent with ta Councilo r _ KaSten $ comments. She referred to Mr. Ashioc c' a ra'gueat- f or a portion Of the:....! area to remain as Commerc .al • Professional. While she empathized with Mrs Mock', s position, she .advised she]. did not ..ink it wasJ. appropriate to consider ��this property s pares ely a , e Mane ;, _ She advised she Supported the ordiaanqe ae Submitted', to `Co mcil. Councilor radon received clarification tlraat tYte 1 - 41.t "Whereas n statement on page . 1 of the ordinance ^ was Simpl ° s..: ° recrammend� t Lon and wad a Commission restating the Planning coma. not, part of the enacting section oaf the ordinance. Councilor Kasten also clarified that las eu port ' as f +o addition of a seotiOn which would direct that n CITV COUNCIL METING MINUTE EPTEMBER, .+ ,! '9 ► 'P ' ,— is Mayor Edwards noted his agreement With statements Made'. by the other Council members: -Be; said it was appropriate to rezone this area back to the conditipris prior ,t0 the Presidents Parkway as had been indicated to the public 7,11 the vote., He referred to Mr. Askacckss request and concurred with Councilor Jo, son,,'s statement that , Would not , be appropriate, at is time to review, these parcels separately. Mayor Edwards called for readired oRDnitiNcE NO. 90-26 ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCTIJSIONS (ATTACHED) ' TO ivAFfitvg cominumeNsive PLAN, liffiNDINENTS TO cliANME 'fIAT PO'cErft,011 OF THE PRESIDENTS VAR:Kollar URBAN REttokup DISTRICT, WHICH WAS DESIGATED' COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL BACK TO LOW DENSITY mingstinAL AND TO DEIME THE RELATED CMPREEORNSIVE PLAN POWCIES (POLICIES 13..8.1 TO 1108.5) AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY itCPA -, 90-0006). " : : ., ' il, .1 ' ' ' • ' ' : . , • ' ' ,,, seconded ' .: . Councilor Moti,r..:.tti.1.%7 Councilor .i7Ohlidon, 'by'.:...'Etidoxli to '''.14:10,pt,103edinance'.NC,,',-907.26:',.:;'',..,',..', , . . .. The ,rziot*on,., was ' approved !,;.y. a tlhanittou,l',.,V00' of .'et0:0,, )‘, 0:i .i. present. ''' ...-,1. ..,''' .,..,'' .'.' ''L .'.',,. , :',''','H,,,.-,',,...-',',,.., ..- ., ''' .•.,,,,,','...!'H,,,,,,,,,,,.,......,,,,,,..H' '. , ..,,,,,, .1.. - .,, . ., .. , ..,, .,- ' -,,,..' layt)r advised Council, WOUld., consider the, . second-, part .tof' the Planning Comtinidsion“,, recommendation that 'the., iiitottger.H. OOmmunity,,.Plan.,,..J?e ,..Used,''ailt:a 0,basie, to ,, develop a..,.plati; ' fdt.',',,,,,',...,,,, the area in the incorporated portin of the , City:.,...',Or''''.,,'...., Councilor Johnson advised that such a ireotammend0,1f;i0ri would entail considerable 'financial agaii staff involvemehti, Shy said she was not prepared to prioritize this area plan at ,this, tiLe. A proposal would need 1 depth ,cliscussi.ori in order, to be pri.ors3,tized With btther . , Work projects' currently being funded and ,staffet. Councilor Kasten concurred with Countlil.Or JoInsons commerits. He said it would he more appropriate for this sul,jeo.t to come to the Council on itS own initiative. Councilor Eadon advised she had no additional comments4, SES ° iph ea Ti d City council went ,into xe-cutzve „A'sessSI,X1-0 Irk t .under the Pr°,,vlistait°inosns°9x re°ISai, 192.660 (1) (4) ( e ) & (11) • to discuss labor relations, t3roiDert:y tractions, cin7rent and pending litigatiort issues ' ' ■ Se ba56O I- Describe Bow the Adopted itsdient-,D ffern,fron,'4" the (It '1,0', same; write "ante. if it wat:-,nnot ,•proposed.A,- Write.,"N/A: the Ac7,4n'mds the Plan', or one Rap; Provide th e. rollo‘.A.ag linfornation for Each Area hich was 'Changed' (Provide a separate sheet 3i 0t: each Multip3.e sheets can be submitted as .a single adoii.tion, action. . lae include street address whenever' nossi.bln. D& 'not' ',Use, tai lot 0 Ner. alone. , Previous Plan Designat,tort: ';'+,4etr* P 'Des gra ienjk 4et.„1,04,c Aareage InvolVed: -r""- Does this Change Incitt(le a Goal' ExCePtion? F� r Residential changes IL,lease /Indicate he Ch Units Pet. Net Acre - L Statewide Planning Goals, are Efitergency Circumstafceo Required ,E10e4ted Rev List Stateside Goals ch 11:< Mat any l ;....ate or Federal l gemntC9, ' a1', Di tri Il�,a may be interested in . Send To: r epartiaent of Land Conser,,Aration and,ivelo 'en.,t 1175 Court. Street, 1N.E Salen, orego . 9731 Q -x;59® r r Etta One (1) Copt ®' the ed .' z::, . 0 1/2 Bound '��'�.&�� and C� p8 ��0�1�" 11 1 I3i� � this form; are ne e, rf, more copa�eg of, . c1bd�, ',ple..ae oor�beo than Y, 3`73 - 0050, or this form may be c plicated on green' Japer's ai ire �o of an adopted plan or land; lase regulation amendment resul'a in ai. t appeal pericdu Appeals may be filed within al' day of the, dates u ,i ►r, .aa a of t i, g daps tailed to ' D'�D. 3tatut�ra re.. , �.re ma3.ln ,Within � w (See OAR 660 -1S =040). FOR DI= uticb Pile Number <pa> adop tfotLU �..r.... ..:.:..::. „sue.+ flg Pr- CITY OF TIGARD, OR GO ORDINANCE NOG 90 ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS, AND . CONCLUSIONS ( A T T A C H E D ) S. APPROVE CommuuUNSITE PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MANGE THAT PORTION OF THE PRSSI »RNT'S. P y URSAN 'RENEWAL DISTRICT .WHICH MS DESIGNATED COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL BACK TO DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ' AND TO DELETE THE RELATED COMPREHENSIVE FLT`? POLICIES 1 ) Ds LING AN RGENO! (CPA �- '9. -®C ©b� (PCBLICIBSI' 11.8.1 T 1a.s�e� NrEERBIs, ou May 1S,' 1990 Tigard ° s citizens voted ntlt to allow the use of tax incramont fund to support the implementation of the P resident a ® Parkway Urban Renewal. District. wHERNA8, on June 11, the TigArd City council repealed the President's ParkwaY Urban Renewal Plan and on Augmet 2, 1990, filed an Affidavit of Etctingz,! ehrent with Washington county to ;nu),Iify said plan. WEIEREPAS, Comprehensive Plan policy i1. .s directs that, 'If for any reason the Presidential P a r k w a y Development Plan is not ' adopted Or approved, within 0 days of such a decision, the 'Tigard City Council shall :hold a public hearing in order to re-re arid p. to policies noted above �:+� Pas Amendment." re-evaluate the �eiaeaa® sett® _ the �,�, VOIEREAS, several public meeting were held . to solicit public ` input fWom Neighborhood planning organizations (Iowa) and citizen Planning' Organisations .a nas (Cl' 0 8) in regards to this issue, and at then :• meetings public cement . f a *"vast changing the Comprehensive Plan of the subject area back to What" it was previous to the mes�iaatodl text wench Da�nta t of the urban 'renewal plan and repealing the 6MRAS, on July 24, 1990 the Tigard Planning Cmnraission following a public hearing were unanimous in a motion, To recommend to the City Council tot (f1)' reverse the decision that amended the Comprehensive Plan end` " text �► sic initiated the President' aaa Parkway proposal, aull (2) in .t it e a planning effort , to develop an area plan using the Mete - Progresaa Plan an the basis to evaluate future land unit and development opportunities io® in the aaraast., WHER3As, on August 13 1990 this Tigard City 9 City Council paab ®saed 'TaoSOlutioicaa 90 Si to initiate h® Plan amendments . following a public hearing to ei M Plannin g commission's rccc .en flien , hear additional Public tt, t hu 0 to re-evaluate the relevant; eban�iv� Plan P��acie a and Plan dap nl� t. 1 ..� WHEREAS; the V + i i g a r d City Council a n d P 1 l a n t e i n g CO' mission held aaa idiot publ #t bearing on September 10, 1990 to review .nn�! ng � assns ssidh r . " nc a do 'ate D ear P1�� well as receive public t stimony. oRD /IANt n FAO. 9 Page 1 SECTION ,: The ,c1pcAprc9111pive, L41,' Prof ewLonai bak o Low and Me ity Reeidential or the area illuBtrated by Map 'A" and change the P1n noted in Exhibit B" to deLete the criteria nd condit;ic that were to have applied ipecifica1Iy to a portion o the propoEod ,POoloden.o, se: Parkway Urb Renewal DLstrict ai Liluatrated *Added by Council motion on September tit,eitettre. ;!. STAFF REPORT T TO h. JOINT MEETING OF THE TIGARD PLANNING cobssassioN AND CITY couNcIL SE RR 10e 1990 -- 7130 P.N. TIGARD CITY BALL . ®a TOWN "H 13125 SW BALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 PACTS aae►rnl. 3 fcasa�aet�:c CAL: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 907.0006 REQUEST: 1) !'' en Slap Amendnont from Commercial Profe.araaionaal (:44oroximately 73 !torso ) to Low Density Residential and Medium Density Ree s9ential (approximately 10 acres). 2) Deletes Co prehnnalve Plan Pcaiciea 11.6.1, to which were ico have applied specifically to the prittoposeC ',?reeiditr t' as Parkway Urban Renewal ! .etriCt. Tb;a plan text ob dined a process for develcpcsent and approval of ,a ma cater Lan fOr tha proposed P Oldenom *.e Parkway Urban Rene arl area, 'fuUUnra rezoning; and pry is ion of necessary public facilities,, APPLICANT: City of Tigard. LOCATION: See attached Maps A r t $�.on p regarding the area p �o ®� for �er�aai See attached �Ra� � A and 8 and Exhibit B for the Comprehensive Plan Policies which are to be deleted. The pLSapased Comprehensive Plan amandmente are intended to be, a f ail step in procese which was prcaap cd by heneive Plrev,Polick 110E1,5 reinting to the pro cod President's Parkway 'Urban Rena al 'Are Tae policy aatatee s ..gg ie. t� � City ii skaa].1 ad n lPhtQ.ae^' .. - �I► ` polW `" and ..ice+► Plan o In May, 1990 the tai fuaa the eat a ino5eez�i�t method of Peid �' Pa�,�%a�,;� Urban Renewal Plan alati re jeoted '; by Tigaxd **eta., Tigae d city ,4 " Ll. eubecquentltt direct d t with 141,,th, the variono F ° a and 0000 to Kf determine the future of the failed tam increment financing district A. P ublic hearing was subsequently held.. befoxe the Planning 'i ®sign this regards., The general consensus of the neighborhood planning organizations and, the citizen participation csrgas izatiOns was to change the Plan for the area back to what it was previous to the sident's Parlsglay proposal. In addition the Planning Commission was unanimous in a motion, aTo recommend to the City council 'tea 1 O reverse the decision that amended the Comprehensive Plan Man and p text which initiated , the Pay ®sielgnt ° a Parkway proposal,, and (2) initiate a planning ffort to develop an area plap using the Metzger - progress Plan as than basis to evaluate future l anhe use and development opportunities in the area." There were some individuals w .��feee�ionnal uses were ::a r who testified that some commercial and, p'" appropriate for the area, , and they desired the City to evaluate the need and feasibility for these uses. ebu'I {.A The g.. y 06±012 on August 13„ 1990 passed Resolution 90 51 to `r ��.bed above. substantial testimony was heard h ®atlla Plan a ®s�e��c►a��in th® Planning hearing lam g anning Commission's recommendation. 0 i5OH cv axed o eat® Otheer than extensive comment received', from the above groups within the last several months there were ne :.dditional agency and /CPO or NPO • :omme tts. IlaeINos• AND CONCLUSIONS8 The x de Planning criteria in this case are Statewide iPlannin t 6 1 1, �2, , 7 10, 9' n /Planning Goals 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14, 160 17, 15, 19, do not apply. It is concluded that the ProPosal is consistent with app ,icable statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based -upon the" following findings a Gicm01. .. . , t xe i 1. The city of • `gard ensures the ep iortunity for citizens to be involved in the review of land use dev►. lopaaent; applications though rcferrat of applications to neighborhood g of certain types of land organizations for comment, through the review use and development actions thrcue h public bearing prc o iuresp and g' , ... hearings and n�teeas of decisions. notification a°n�ais ate► for Public through following uor�.bed anvt Notices of the oaad .. �. i p�pb►" corehensiv® plan Nap atld text dmante Provided to the neihborhood! lamming e�: anitat ,cam, Published it' one ;� g Planning . igaard Vimes and mailod. to pg y otaner:� 50 feet of o d propel tes subject to the map amendment. ,ttn as ya Staff Re pow � - 961 005 The City Council and Planning Commission will receive either written or oral ,testimony at a Po :blic-Hearing to held Septembe r-10, 1990. mass . 2 a ( .rind U a Pie ninon This goal is satisfied through city prbceducea which call for the C ,tY to apply all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, Cit Comprehensive Plan Policies, and communitY Development Code Requirements to the proposal being preeen;ede a o� 5 t (O n Sac : and Nat gral Resmligg,211 This germ is satisfied because any future development in the area will he accomplished in accordance nce with City, state, and federal regulations which are intended to protect existing wetlands, significant vegetation, streams and w atersheds, and other natural features in the area. dal 7>a atnatural i•_; a xad® This goal is addressed because any rt wedevl '� y oodplain, floodways, and tlands of the aarea�willeb reviewed according to the city of Tigard's sensitive lands ordinance and by appropriate state and federal agencies. Goal 1Q s at Roua Lna 9 Rousing opportur t $ su will be maintained by emending the Plan from rcial Pr(i)ftia®ional bags to Low and Medium Density Re idential. The applicable City of Tigard COmprehensive Plan Criteria in th°,s case urea, 11.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 6.1.1 It is concluded that the proposal is consistent with appiiceb o City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Polities based upon the following findinges p,,,a ,, Lay L .11. AS indicated previously the change a is consistent with applicable Statewide Plaaannin 0 Goals. Through an extensive Citizen involvement process regarding the proposed actions the Plan is being kept current with the needs of the community. E 7 ov rr Z1 .' a s � m G r 3. 6 s 7 r ®Z _ �4,� These goliciee will be . tddresfih�u g h review any future development propiaals for the subject area that may have isPacts on the designated floodplaiu and floQdway of Aob Creek and associated wetlands. Any future development proppoaale affecting these resources will be evaluated by th) city of g Lands. raview process. a ®al® affecting wetlands w reviewed by the appropriate atnta add federal agencies- g,31.ein policy 601.1 Redesi g ation of the area back to ,, and ;e>m Density will maintain . an opportunity... for a ... c ..t sty ...:of housing ,:'. denaitieig and residential types. However, the redesign cation of the subject area to residential will not affect affect the City of Tiga rd's Compliance with 0regon Administrattoe Rules} chapter 660, Division 7- the Metropolitan titillating Rule's housing ® psrtunity regnirements for ing le f family �uult ®fanily and medium raawsidentinl density for developable residential properties. the tat Y'S . hous i n uo L t index currently ides an ow�orteity fo, t.22 dwelling units Per sta f Report " A 90 0006 atimir ittl.mmosit • tir4;:st • 3ottindar3r for th qoacestuall Development Ipleut4 are. (Ocavinahansivvi nab roilaies • 11.0.1 - 11.0.0 oippty to this NI =ea) , I { No .Wu P /BIT /3' PLAN POLICIES THAT APPLY SEE PRESIDENT° POLICIES PAEEW4Y , ®YO— �....-- aw�ra.----- as�ee� ►aow.---- ar--- -.a ®ao�m ---- ®miry ®::o --- ��or ®mrsarareomerr ii.�ler 11.8.1 A► COMPREHENSIVE CONCEPTUAL DE` ELOPlaNT , P `gilt= ;SE PREPARED FOR TIE AREA SHOWN AS MAP : TWO. IRIS ' CON `'EPA DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED AND ADOPEED EC, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT SUBJECT TO tE REQUIREMENTS' OF SECTION 8 . SO OF F THE CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY D VELOP NE ° CDDE . 11.8.2 WITHIN TIE IDEN'TX ZED' AS PLANNED DEVELOPEETNT, ALL 'APP EC,ATIONS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NAP AMENDIONT ZONE CHANGE "I DEVICEOPMENT REVIEW (1S. 120, ',UDC) CONDITIONAL USE (18 130,' CDC) AND LAND DIVISION (1 1624? CDC) SHALL . rat FOUND TO CONFORM TO THE " APPROVED 1� 80. ' CDC APP A7 CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ,� � �. i� ®1 � • OF A DETAILED ;DEi %OPNENT PLAN FOR EACH PRASE XDNTIFI 9 IN THE CO CEPTU EL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SENEL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS, OF . CODE Y�EQUIEHEK S THAT APPLY F° TAY OF D OTHER OMEN ' PROPOSED » CITY , REQUIRE A. �� ADDITION, CITY• SHAG '� SEEM DETAILED ASSESSMENT OR UPDATE CF EXISTING ASSESSMENT POLICY 1168.5 AS NECESSARY FOR ` 5� OUTLINED $IN C)LI IN ORDER TO APPROVE APPLICATIONS FOR PLAN AMENDMENTS SUESEQUE TO THE ADOPTION OP THIS POLICY Air APPLICAT DNS REF S T AD,. F/ ® IN THIS TOR PUBLIC IMPROMEENE'S .FOUND TO R,EP 3�Ca� A�ISI�SE SUBSEQUENT UPDATE D BY FUNDING THE CITY DURING THE P E BE NEE OF TEM CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MAN (11.0.5) YILUST EXIST TO OR CONC. T WITH APPROVAL OF APPLICATION. RIO�t t 1.1.8.3 APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE MINOR IN NATURE RELATED ON —GOING NTEM I A �PIEP OF EXISTING TING IMPRO VE4 AND WHXCH WILL NQ, re THE OPINION OF TEE DIRECTOR, JEOPARDY' _TEE LE'M N tTION OIL . THE &PROVED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPS, PiA21 MAI BE EXEMPT :1M014 4roucy,11.8.3. 111.8.4 THE CONTESTS S OF TPE CONCEP IN' LU(E THE IT LISTED IN .. .... 1S . 8 1 ADDITION, E FOLLOWING C ICAL. STUDIES AND OTHER NECESSARY I t ACCEPTED OR ADOPTED APPIROPREATE AS A ART OF ' THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLEA A. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM WIZ TEPE r - LOCATIVE' O OU USES DEVIELOPMENT PROGRAM SHALL , BE IDENTIFIED FOR M , AS A litiC, ,} D FOR wIRIOUS PHASES OF DEVELOPMT. WHICH ME NEEDED FOR l'3AcE1 P SHALL Aires° xlintizATE MEl • PUBLIC FACILITY AND , UTILITY ASSESSNietiTs AN ASSESSIONT OF THE ON AND OFF-SITE WATER.' SEWER, DRAINAZTE AND UTILITY REQUIREMENTS RESULT! FROM AND RELAINAD iO 1,11ACH PEASE or DEVELOPMENT. FLOOD CONTROL AND FLoOD PREViNTIO*14.4$,ESSMENT: ASSESSMENT, NANAGMENT VLO, DESIGN • FOR THE WETLAND PONDS AND 'LAKI4 'PROPOSE ',,OF. THE PWSIDENT IS PARKWAY DEVELOP ASSESSMENT SHOULD' 410RESS THE, F2DERAL, STATE .AND • LOCAL PERMITTING' REQUIREMENTS AND RNATIVES. THIS ASSESSMENT BE REQUIRED BEFOP ANY PHASE *MICR NAY PHYSICALLY IMPACT 'TER wET ;LAND LAKE LD POND. OR WOULD RDIQU,IRE 'THESE' nntointerOTS IN ORDER 'fl TO -RANDLE STORM WATER REQUIREMENTS., F. larrzcira C-CirtOOL ItICLOCAT/011s A,PLAN FOR THE r , OF METZGER SCHOOL WILL HE DEVELOPED IN COltiau.'111CTIOlt WITH TIGAIW SCHOOL IlirSTRICT. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT zarrzwri scioOL WILT. NOT BE movitri., AND ,Wsur. REMAIN IN ITS PRESENT LOCATV),N, ThEN TiTE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WILL NAKE A.,,PROPRIATE PROVISIONS FOR THE CONTINUED PRESENCE OF THE SCHOOL IN THIS G. IMPLEMENTATION AND FINANCING ASSESSMENT: 610111E TRANSPORTATION, PUBLIC FACILITY AND OTHER PROJECTS REQUIRED BY PHASE COSTS, FUNDING SOURCE AND FUNDING rtzESPONSI B %LITT H. DESIGN GUIDELINES AIWPUBLIC niPHOVEPLEHT STANDARDSr SHOWING DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING HEIGHT, BULK, ARCHITECTURAL CHARACtER AND OTHER FEATURES, AND STANIDPARDS FOR PUBLI.,. AS _ _ LANDSCAPI17G SIONAGE ETC. GUIDELINES sitiftti ALSO INCLtJDE METHODS TO ADEQUATELY BUFFER JaIPACE IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS STREISTS f Snuff rscAp J t'I :� MViAnci nMM Item CITY OF TIGARD. 0 CMINCIL AGENDA ITFF $11leaut AGENDA OF:, < ;' eptember 10 1990 SSUE /AGS�ti'Ak TITtE ,� • chancre th�e�,lsn es.. for'''.= apt` ' : =` on of the President's Pa ay UrbantAenel l Dia- trict which w : der gzzated� h.,0„,rc a ITT Pry esioi awl hr ••a' k : to Re i 1 DEPT HEAD OK' CITY =MIN OK =====mar========= =scum DATE SUBMITTED: Abet 30.0 PIOUS. ACTION: the .Counei . adl$ed the Planni'na Com- m es .on,� a recoy nendat an o bAld ' fri public;heas'4 .nq_ta° chance the Plan D ®sicma ack to residential and to rescind the ire' event Plan policies. PREPARED BYr t, io`tafi' Bn'n'oh q..Sr Planner rEQUESTED BY: Ed Murphy , community Development Director, =======s4=====memismamm================= POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council redesignate that portion 'of ''the President's Parkwaj Urban Renewal District which was designated commercial- Profereional back to Low'' and Medium- DeneitY Residential, and to rescind,, the relevant Comprehensive Plan policies ==== :xs = = === ==w=== ==-m = =mbts ..sc =a:^ ....: - = == sae ====ssn=== =s = =s= ==rims =z4--- se — =s= =a.== INITYON SUMMARY To date several public meetings have been held with area NPO's and cCO's. The general consensus of these groups is to change the a Plan for the area back to what it was previous to the President's Parkway proposal In addition the .Planning CeMMieet0A was unanimous in a motion, "To ire' cianend to the City Council to: (1) reverse the decision that amen ad ' the & omprehensive Plan Map and text which initiated the President's Parkway proposal, and (2) initiate a panning offort to develop an area plan using the .metze r -Progress Plan as the basis to evaluate future land use and development opgortunitien in the area." Cea First bank desires to build a branch in the area and cazinot do no because of the de -facto moratorium currently in place. The atta.4ied ordinance to reds; ignate the area contains an emergency clause to allow thX® de4elopment to take place as soon as possible. asasasa; W"w saras3nsaaimmilaamaass ==t= rig:= = === ==== =a=rias =a == == =s=saa animus! e===0,=asas —= = ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED The. Neighborhood Planning and Citizen Fax Lcioation Organi2atione, and ' the Planning Commission in both a work session and pub 5c hearing evaluated the effects of _ not amending the plan as described above.' This was > determined undesirable because: 1) The Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations in the area currently do not match and property ,owners are subject to uncertainty as long as the they, do not Coincide. Furthermore, the current Plan text Which applies es to the area re � ire° that t devel o Pm snt occur i. n accordance . . d. o .. a "master Plan." The Master plan does and cannot prepared �iit�out substantial. expenditure. As a ca sequence, the area is under a de -facto development moratorium. 2) There in .inadequate time to evaluate ,a range of land use options and meet the 90 day timeline eetau! lished by the Comprehensive ,flan Aolicmesit., 3) Ti arzi% - voters ate policies ..and the reh�eneive Plan ) g a voters said a definite no to the tax i al the policies. ...and ax ....increment -, l�ailQt'. Policy 11 �a ... to re my ��, measure. 4) Without tax increment financing, or a ae` eloper willing to ` invest in the infrastructure a ate means s to fund the ne eSaary planning `.etndIe ' or` area, there i p 'ante '! ; make the .'vrea available for nsore intent.' development. assent ' emafter being Mr.a of Sept ber, ,' 19`90. ' !PROVE D. a Thi ___ day' ,of September, 19'90.'.. 1 ti 4' 1- :1 T EXBIBIT A AGENDA STAFF . REPORT TO :A JOINT ''MEETING OF TEE T GARD PLANNING. ` COMMISSION' ND CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER. 10, 1990 -- 7:30 P.M. TIGARD CITY HALL ; -- TIWK HALL 13125 SW, BALL BLVD. TIG RD, OR ..97223 FACTS GLeikeral Information CASE s Comprehensive Plan Amendrner4t CPA 90 -0006 REQUEST: 1) Plan Map Amendment from ACoc arciN-1 . Professional (approximately 78 acres ) to Low' Oansity ,Residential. and Medium D$1\ne#.ty Residential; (approxia►stely 10 acres) 2j Delete Coep,:ebensive Plan Policies 11.8.1 to 11.0.5 which were to have applied specifically to the proposed PrcAident's Parkway Urban Renewal District- The plan te*t cvtlined a procesu for development and approval of a master'Plan for the proposed' President's. Parkway Urban Renewal are,a ftiAture rezoning, and Provision of necessary public facilities: AP'P • LICANT . City of Tigard. LOCATION: See attached Maps A and B. See attached Maps A and B regarding the area proposed for redesignation and Exhibit 13 for the Caapre?!,,,ansive P3.an ` Policies which ' are to be deleted. amendments n�cended to ' final The proposed rel�ensiv ©Plan i amp � p be � �.�. relating to the Proposed President r h Urban Renewal Area. r Parkway P P step in recess which was r ed h 1 he Isla policy states: 1f for any reason the President's Parksa! Development ?Plan is licit adopted or a ved, withih►� 90 '�?s of such a s�+ciw3r��,� ; flaw Tice PPS City Coancli sh83:1 bald a public hearing in order to ze-evaltuate . ] iciee az+ated above (eaclosod as *ttaC ent 1►) atii:' the the po ei►eaeive Plan Amendment-" In May, 1990 the tax increment Method of funding the President's Parkway W , eacted staff to sleet with the vairi.cius NPA�' a and COi' a to Urban Renewal Plan 'Wail re eoted by Tigard 'Voters- ®ubee enti dir � Tigard C d CPO , s to � Y Staff Report CPA - 90 -0006 determine . the futurp of the failed tax incremen A • public hearing was subsequently held; 'before t. this regards. financing district. e 'r Planning Commission Two " ,general consensud� :: of the `neighborhood, planning organizations ,an the citizen participation Organizations- was to . change the Plan for the area back to what it was ,previous' to the President's 'Parkway proposal. In addition. the Planning Coesaission : was unanimous in a ' *ion, , " "To reco aneand to the City Council to s (1.) reverse the 'decision thiit amended the Comprehensive Plan Map and text, which initiated the Ppresidento a Parkway proposal, and (2) initiate a►;pienning effort to devea.op an area plan using the Metzger-Progress Plan as the oasis I to evaluate future lard use and development opportunities in the .visa.'" There were some individuals w ho testified that ce` corercial.` .rn p rofessional use s were a p r p r ata for the area, and they desired -the City to evaluate the need and feasibility d mees. T'ho Planning CommisA on 0, ' A4ugo st 1$, 1990 piassed • ,Resolution . 90 51 to initiate the Plan amendments as described above. Substantia3. • test ny •. wais t!raard H at this hearing euppc►rting the, Planning Comniiesion''s r4eeommendationo • semen and N PO Comments omnents Other than extensive comment received from the above troupe s within .the several 'months there were no ,,,,,additional agency and /CPO or NFO` ''coMmente. 3. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The appi. kablc Statewide Planning Goal, criteria in this case are ' Statewide Planning Coals 1, 2, 5, 7e 10, • Statewide Planning coals 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17o 18, 19, do not ILpply; It • is concluded that ; the r prePCsal is consis°.tent, with applicable statewide Planning Goals and Guidelineb baaed l upon the following findings 3 .±s1 1 f Cit izen Inwo' The City of Tigard ensures the y .... inl1ve4 in the review of lane use and opportunity for citizens to � �-" pne though pp neighborhood organizations io s fo cc ctO rent, through the review o or applications to. I of certain types 'of land. PP au refesrab g use and development actions through public hearing prboedurea; and through following prescribed nOt fication ,requirements for public hearings a s of �decieions. and notice Notices of the pro provided to the nei proposed retie a Plan Map and text : amendments ,was Po '�P r�eiv neighborhood planning .organisation published P .... ► pith tied > in the Tigard Times and mailed to olPex"ty Ownera i.thi'n X50 feet; ' . of, the Properties ,cub ject to the map aii endment. � �v Staff Report CPA 00- 0006' J • -e• tx The City Council and ' Planning commission will receive :eifh er written , or oral testimony at a, Public Rearing to be held September 10, 1990. Goal 2 s'(Land Use Planning' This i, goal is eatisf ietl .through. City procedures which call for the City to apply ' all applicable ,Statewide' Planning . Goals, City Cam►reheneive "len Policies, and Community Development Code Requirementij to the proposal being presented. gIGIL , 5 s (Open Space and Natural Resou ices This o �..._1 goal . is ®atiefie a3 because any future development in the area will be accomplished accordance with City, state, and federal regulations which are intended to protect existing wetlands, significant vegetation, streams and watersheds, and other natural features in the area. , Opal 7 (natural Hasards) This goal is addressed because an Pment 100 any deve: �� proposals affecting the 19® year floodplain, floodwaye�, ` and. wetlanie of the area will be reviewed 'according , to ',the , City of TigArd's efnsit,Swe lands ordinance and by appropriate state and federal agencies. Goa l 101 (, H1ousinql Housing opportunities will be maintained by amending the Plan from Commercial Professional aback to Low and Medium Density Residential. The applicable City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Cr1t ria in this case are: 1.3.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 6.1.1 It is concluded that the proposal is consistent '4ith applicable City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies based upon, the following findings: Plan Policy 1.1.1 As indicated previously the change is consistent with applicable Statewide Plannin 4 Coils. Throu gh as extensive e is C ibteisneg n involvement P rocese regarding the pro po ®Qd actions Plan kept current With the needs of the Community. Plan Policies 3.2.1 3.2 6 2 .3.2.3 3.4 1 and,3 4. Tire se policies will ��... . 2 be . addressed throw h review of any futurt development proposals for the u cr that h veiax,cte desi eted floedplaln and fbc t Y Ash.Creek: and ab oeiated we1Mlende. Any future, development proposals affecting these :eeEaaurces w.7.1 be evaluated 11:y the City of: Tifact's we neitive Lands review process irthermore :. proposals g Ti acrd a `� Hands will be reviewed b she a p y ppropriate ®tats and,; federal agencies. Plan. Polite ck to Low and y 6� �tedee�,:xation of the area 'ba, itediiata �pp, ..y,. u�ensit will. maintain �n o oortun ; :t for y diverei�t s�f sou® densities and rosident3:al types. However, the redes e gnation of 'the etrb ject area to residential Will not affect the' City of igard's the', %lefts l ' . � �. �. compliance with Oregon Administrative Rules Cha er 660y Divi►ion 7° Pb itan Housini::._ e�in g Rule � v hc�usin opportunity requirements for le family --- multi - family and medium r ential density for g said ' develo pable residen t ial (properties The g o gp ortunit y index currently provides a +�n: orp,�,+r+: inf ty for 19.22 dwel ing units per w Staff ROporgy CPA, - 00 -0006 reccmmer=ded . that tho 'Ca ur e t„ ''Plan , designation um, DennAty ‘Rnitidenttn 3 to a the Cc tapre ,erueiie «P3 reaa Staff 'Repo 0006 - Boundary for the area that was redeaLgnated frasn Reaidentia1 to CommercLai/Prefessional• Boundary for the Devei.opmett '0140„ 41,545. ,itpply to thLi area) No scale , , ll BZHIBY;T LAN POLICIES THAT APPLY TO PRESIDENT! AHKWm! FOLICIEFA u�����:ia� era �'I�.s���Ibs��tO•1��N��.l�a�r a�s r����w������a���lrb �'. 11.8.1.. A 1 COnJ IREHENS'sVE CO (" ! PTUAL DEVELOPMENT" ; PLAN SHALL BE PREPAtED FOR %'h'�3 ; SHOWN 'AREA AS NAP,, TWO. THIS '.CONCEPTUAL DEVELC►PNENT PL d SHA Z BE,. PREPARED A D. ADOPTED' " A prAmiso DEVELOPMENT . OVERLAY: DISTRICT b SUBJECT. TO : ' HE ,REQUIREMENTS OF` SECTY,ON 18.'80. OF THE CITY OF TIG D COMMUNITY DEVFL+OPMEN' CODE (CDC) WITHIN THE AREA "1)ENTI'b'IED PLANNED DEV` LOPMENT ALL APPLICATIONS FOR 'COMPREHENSIVE. PLAN MAP ,AMENDMENT , BONS, CHANGE , I SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (18 a 110 , CDC) , �- •CONDITIONAL USE (1S 130,F 01130 LAN ' AND D 'DIVISION (18.160- 162, CDC) SHALL BE FOUND TO CONFORM TO THE APPROVED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPI NT, PLAN (.18.80. ,1.10., ; CDC), . APPROVAL OF .y R .PHASE IDENTIFIED A. , DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLAN � h°�1 • r NT PLAN SHALL . ' BE SUBJECT TO IN .� COI►TCl''EPTt1AL :DEVELOPMENT THE. REQUIREMENTS THAT' Q�F 18 . 80 OF THE, CDC AN`) OTHER CODE APPLY TO THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED ADDIlI1N, TIE CxTY REQUIRE A MORE DETAILED ASSESSF1ENT OR UPDATE OF AN' EXISTING ASSESSMENT Ati S` NEC ESSARY FOR ANT ITEM, OUTLINED IN POLICY 11,.8.5. �.b8. 11.8+.3 • .8.4 IN ORDER TO APPROVE APPLICATIONS FOR .PLAN AMSNDMEN3�S' SUBSEQUENT TO THE ADOPTION OF THIS POLICY AND .OTHER APPLICATIONS REFERRED TO IN ,.. 'TES SUBSECTION ADEQUATE FmNDING VOR PUB� , � IMPROVEMENTS FOUND TO BE E NEEDE) 13Y THS C ITY DURING. PREPARATION AND SUBSEQUENT UPDATE OF THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (11.8.5) MUST EX1.3T 'PRIOR VtA OR CONCURRENT WITH , <APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION. APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE MINOR IN , NATURE RELATED t JTENANCE AND UPKEEP OP EXISTING .IMPROVE AND WHICH WILL NOT, IN THE OPINION, OF THE DIRECTOR, JEOPARDIZE THE APPROVED CONCEPTUAL IMPLEMENTATION OF APPItO DEVIILOPJ &ENT PLAN MAY BE EXEMPT FROM POLICY 11.8.3. CON1 EITS ' OF THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELO'JiiENT INCLTJDn THE ITEMS LISTED IN 18.80.110 OF THE CDC. IN ADDITION,, THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL STUDIES AND R .:. , . NECRSSAR3 ITEMS SH BE ALL E. P TED OR ADOPTED AI PROPRIATE 1AS A PART THE CONCEPTUAL nEVELOPNEIT AS PLAN', A DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: THE TYPE, AMOUNT AND LOCATION THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM SHALL HN OF VARIOUS USES . . ENTIF�.gD FOR THE AND FOR I� 4 � AREA AS A WHOLE PHASES '' OF DEVELOPMENT. •i BASING P THE DEVELOP 'in! : THE NE'29/SWAY, r'� ILIA RA�NSPORTAS"ION INPROVENE HICH ; ARE NEEDED FOR ILL ALSO INDICAT� ONSTRUCTION IMPACTS AN OT BEING RELEvEltioPE I NEIGHBORHOODS . • TRANSPORTATION ASSESSME At3SESSN ENT OF THE AND OFF —SITE TRTaFFIC'REQUIREME iTS `In'ESULTING FROM fli) RELATED TO EACH PHASE OF I DEVELOPI4EAT, THE ASST SSMEL 1 SHALL ` IDENTIFY TRANSPORTATION FROJiiC,TS INCLUDING;, 'TRANSIT,: TO REDUCE .POTENTTIAL TRAFIC XMACTS ON ALJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND THE DEVELOPMENT "' AREA. . PUBLIC FACILITY AND UTILITY ASSESSMENT: AN ASSESSMENT OF . THE ON AND OFF SITE WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY REQUIREMENTS ,14ESUL7'ING ,:FROM DEVELOPMEI T . OF �� AND RELATED TO EACH PHASE � FLOOD CONTROL AND FLOOD PREVENTION ASSESSMENT: AN ASSFSSIONT, MANAGEMENT PLAN AND' CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR THE WETLAND PONS AND LAKE' " PROPOSED AS PART OF THE PRESIDENT'S " PARK WAY'. 'DEVELOPMENT 'PLAN. ASSESSMENT SHOULD ,ADDRESS ;THE FEDERAL ", STATE AND LOCAL PERMITTING REoUIREMENTS AND .ALTERNATIVES. THIS ASSESSMENT SHALL ',BE R EQUIRE!', `BEFCsE ANY PHASE, �IC.� ,MAY PHYSICALLY IMPACT THE WETLAND LAKE AND PO ;D, OR WOULD REQUIRE THESE IMPROVEMENTS . IN ORDER TO fANDL STORM` 'WATER REQUIREMENTS. �lAN FOR THE lRELOCA TION L�TZGER SCHOOL RELOCATION: A P OF METZGER SCHOOL WILL BC DZ!ELOPED IN 'CONJUNCTION WITH 'TGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT METZGER SCHOOL WILL NOT BE MOVED, AND WILL RAIN IN YTS PRESFVi 'RATION, THEN THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN S 1LL MAKE APPROPRIATE PROVISIONS FOR THE CONT KN1JED ,PRESENCE OF THE SCHOOL" IN THIE AREA. • IMPLEMENTATION ID FIB, AIICINC3 ASSESSMENT: SHOW] NG '� V'Seq TRANSPORTATION,, PUBL]GC \.AGILITY, AND fROJECT'' REQUIRED 'BY PHASE COST FUNDING SOU� FC�NDTRG RESPONSIUILI``'Y. DESIGN GU?`DELINES ANTI PUBLIC IMPROVEMEliT STANDARDS: ` 1DELINE FOR FRIVATI� ,;AE'VELQPNENT` S�OWINr� DESIGN �Ux INiIiLUDrNG HEIGHT 0UtK 0 Ci AR CTER ADD OTHER FATuRES, AND STANDODS FOR P iBL �C IMPROV;GMENTS SUCH AS STREETS, STREETS'E, LAND SCAPING � .. ... BU_ FFi if t S HAtt INCLUDE, METHODS ADEQU.TrLY NEIGHBORHOODS air As you are aware, the Columbia 'Group Sie.rra' Club, 'they 4700 won "et ,f ii late o£ the national S'ier'.. a' Flub, p reviously} 10sed presidents, Parkway Urban Renewal District W p .an 'due tea that_ p'lan'' s failue . to address'. ∎, certain,. immediate ` rues,, involving �wation- ,i'urthe..r,,more, ;the;' Glut t,rarisport�ation .and wetlands presed� , felt that the .City, ,had 'arrso"ecl at, this' point by failing to follow the. + process axid ,,goals set f rth in Oregon s lance use laws. The re,sults of last ,;Maay'. sl,eledt ion indicates that +igard voters ahare the ;:lub s position. T The Club recommends that the°, City change' the plan. designation and ',the' " Tigard Comprehensive Plan; text to " the ';des g'tiations that were The . Glub, 'w'ott�.d in place. •before the. Presi.dents Parkway .'prOPosal.M : , + , also urge the c.ii.l m , to carry out, the appropr ate analysis, not ► ni, ' in terms of loc��l needy` and proposals but t 1,eo in re;: ationi ..moo{ bAfor!� taking ac ion on`. regional structure 4 and , plans, �__ . ,, comprehensive p,lar na)d .fications for this ,area .,o.r elsewhe`re within ,? 11 Tigard 'Pl:eaae otake, this :Getter part Hof. ,the wri,ttetz'.recc r'd on, ,this . matltet:4 Yf you #have any questions regarding; the C .:!by s position ran thi . filar 1:seue or on' it s * views. regarding land use', please ie,al partic' .r ; (tree to call: me at 452 -2298. S�1EiRA�, J1 1SSCO Pi'Ps LTE 537 SW.1.hiat r' t set+ Po land, O egos 97201 6 t I • CXT! .•, RESOLUTION „NO. :90 ,, • A =SOLUTION TO INITIATE A CY)IIPREHENSIIII1f,PLAII ,ANEND14Kiii TO ,70E- AREl.k PPLE1171.008LY PUOPosEWAS THIc PResIDIINT'a PARKWAY TIRBAM PANIgwAL'DIsTRIcT"' , • , , ,„ • • , • t • . • ' , ' • , , • , , • , ' WITICREAI,S, on May 15, 1990 Tigard's citisctlras votett not to alloy, the use Of tax increment funds to support the iiv471eaerti:atiort of the President's Parkway Urban lifblisigai District, ' WHEREAS, on Cune 3.1, the Tigard City Council -.7::::pealed the PressiLdfAtit.te parkway ,Urban Renews,]. Plan an on August 2, 1990, filed an Affidavit of Ilictitiguisilant with Neashingtori county to nullify said plan. , , • • ' • , , • „ • ,1 , , ' I ' , •I , ' comi)reheostva 771an policy 11.8.5 directs that 'If for any rasa= the PreoLdent's Parkwar DevelePeeat Plan is not "Adopted or npproved,, within 90 days of istIcla deci.iiione the Tigard City Cc)uncil shall hold a s$ublio hearing in order to re-exra1uftte the policies noted ,skl)ol,ve and the Cninprehensivca 'Plan Ameriadmenih." WHIIREPIS 1.3evoral pibLi lactetincje were held to solicit public intlut from Neighborhood 1anning Orgarki.satic)ris (NPO's) and Citizen Plitnni.ng Organi.es.tiona (CPO's) in rega?.'dos to this I.ssue, and at these meetings public comment favored changing t-hri C4.prehensive Flan of the subject area back to wih tl.t. it was previous to the c.i.„_.velopment of the i.irbarl )5.,00settia1 plan rc)pefilialg the afssiooifitet.t text araendalerits. WHEREAS, din July '24, 1990 the Tigard ' Vlantiing COSimi.sisicn':f0,1/o-iting thpi,ablic-,,h: , . heaii!tg were 'unanimous in a Motion'', "To, rimnattid to the city nhail :telt ro•visllet the , deciiiOn that athendOitt the comprehensive' hPlan ' atiO text ;Whiah I.nitLateid the PreSident10 Parkway piapoaal, and (2)''.hinit.i.ate a' plashing effort to develop an area 'Plan Using the ''Netiger,,Progrecia.::Plan' a',fil'::the basit.'''tO .- , , valuate futlir, ,1:end use and develOpMant .opportunitiai ,1.1.4it the 'atliaii",., . ' . • ,,, • ..., ... . 1 ., NOW .,r,. TBEEEIr0E11, BE IT ItsB,C)IiVELJ' by the '-rigaird ,00,ndiltOs ' ,' .,'..,, ,' ,,,': ' ,, , ,, ,,,,,, ,, 1,,,, • ,,,,,, , .• . • , , - , , , , , , ,, Initiate ' a coinPrehenriVe- Plan kolonamOl''it, '.,*(): ',1':01iiiii00-''thOtilkroillt%'..,P1.atil...,':...,,,, designations f#6d 0000ateiti ptofeittionti1 ,,bi0k,..,t6HtdolionitityAtaidetititil i6k... the area iliudittatd by Map i,,A,1.1 ind,..*0,:dhil.006.1.1:::thlii:tiggi#4HtuO#110-4!igko'44 Text (Pdlidies 11.8.1 to 1148,5) io-.,ditiiipto, th, etitottit.,atid tenditiOnithat-- ,• ... ... ,..• • . . , PFSOUTIPN't0, 50''' Pagel 1,1 - , • " f or . d xstra itx 0: ►WEST: CENT GROVE :EMt ERY = = = =e ri V 11 lam Ds r ST. • ii sAile..CCIN ST Fat k' an t ill 1 MIN ST IiiP Mil MIL eitIvr ., 111111*., L.91 „LP-11, ■ 4441ED N11161 'A VIII - mitailh. 42 t1-47%. UK 11 _111111 :MU 'III 11111 %OAR !II 1111 !fl! siE :Plin Ell ... 171 41 P599 111111fill :75,3?, p.m lz.i ' ' '4021111 "-ir'ort. .ii .,,,,,,.■-:;0017 .',.7r, AP i a ■ ,,, .'.. 1114 .11 $ -,11111.01.1-RIE }, lf-Pglialej AZ! itilvhez....?„d,....0ai , . g we airri spi., na 25 pre: MIL fl 111, I rdiletra".;.4 cum tip74-04070- L. atie-t1 tieqTr cITn or Cab 07 TIC2t D, 'mss Tigard Planning C.:AtIlission iaOKs Ron Bunch, Senior Planner 0 AI7 RR� Agenda Item 5.3: Compre hensive Plan Amendment CPA. 90.0006 President' e Parkway -- Re- evaluation of Current CSC eprehensive Plan Deatgrat'lon and Aseociatedl Policies DATdf July 17, 1990 1 The City C.ouncL1 has requested that the Planning eooiission , hold a �wblic hewing to - receive !citizen input and forward a recos iendatiora 3 i regards , to the future of' the area that comprised. the tailed., Press ent' i Parkway urban renewal diatriet. The City council is a('eting in accordance with COmgceh+ensive Plan Policy 11.8.9, which atatess "If for any siltaeaa the President's Parkway Dareelopsmaat Maui is not or approved,;: within 90 days of such a decision; the Tigard city Cool ucil shall bold a 'public hearing ill order to re- owdanate the poticiai notsdi. -abo e g ncicsed as Attacesent A) and the Comprehensive Plea a 1 As part of this process the, council., directed 'teff.. , to receives input from Tigard's Neighborhood Planning Organisations .()iPO's) and the Community Planning Organizations (CPC's). During the months of June and July staff set with groups. ales present 'IA), your at your June 10, 2990 %ioarkshop on ' this L301e110 all of these' groups favored redssignating the aaY.s , back to tha way it was and repealing the Plan text amendments.' This was determined appropriate for the following re =* sonsr 1) The Coahensive Plan and zoning designations in the area currently 'do. not match. Property owners are sUb ject to t ruertainty Ma long as the Plan designation and the :onizv do not coin icida. r'urihermore..., ate current Plan teat which apnplies to the a it requi r.e that dsira lopr� nt Occur ,,n aocdrdanc <a to an sailer Alen. Tai Master plan .doe.: esist , and kcannr� t t be prepared r ithOut substantial 'e ..acpsndituse. '' Al 'a cone equenct; th area Le under a de -facto ,dttiolopment ooratorivia. There° is inadequate time to evaluate `' a rang. a 4 land use optitni area and meet the 90 day timelines established taYy the above Cow* Plan 'Policy. 3) Tigard' a Voters said a definite no is t.ha taut incri nt ballet awsaueriaic.. !Ran though it ie not appaient: iarhet etepeot of the proje Wee reji7ct Wy e.g. develo aaethu cf financing, � N t,bzing ar in enera', the P� C#aiy itself" dh ®resie�i ' ,'i�1te . the 'ere, �� , , , 9 ., it r�ras ; and �.onc 9 entry ,e on areas more su al /prcfee.ional ited ic�r, s�•.iserci development, Ploas, find Attached ,th• CemPrehenaPta Plan (Attachment 3) that curr notiy apply to the arena' • e it i 1111 11"1111 11 !4CT ,ISM ■ /I11UIY1a IN* .._Inu.tiIio ■ ti 410 MI �4 RAM III ,,,,E444;..ff i: .= etr.e9c 111i an 1 1017 zi wi la MI osalm.. 33:11 ,_...__._.____,i_ — 6 /4:61117t4111111 II 'I—.. slimy ti ♦ _maim, HALL BLVD. Lw"GIBILITY STRIP aM111. de NB MK ft Id di JUL. 24 '90 16.01 DAM ' RE: ASIILOCK MON= ON S.W. OAK STREET 'IL 3800 S.W.1 /4, ,E.1/4, SEC 'ION 35, T1S, R1Vir Dear Planning Commissioners: This left; r is written an behalf of Mr. Tomas Ash lock ei Tigud, ovmew of the above referentied p typr y is located within t conceptual development area pt v 'isly as Presidents' Parkway. Ai a remit of the failure of the tax fin�anc ing prowl for the Parkway Urbau'Rene District o'tbe regent public election, the Qty is required to review the comprehensive plan map fed i► A. The gn change of the ,he area. es ills , r � r� Map . 5 d ons fram ., Professional to Medium toeing)? Residential and Low Density R dentIa1 is a Y�ro return to the Origing desivAtion prior to the proposed Presidents Parkway 1Jrban that the Qty is required to take; this action Reaca��� Oct„ It is am unde�ta�duag , within 90 days aster the ;fair' of the issue at the polls. However, the City does hawse two apparent options: 1, leave the designations as they are and begin the planning proems which would involve medics of wattr.traffic, wetlands„ lucal utilities, awl other ice; 2. redesignate to the original desigmation. ‘t. Ito is our belid that the time forme from the election to the required review �' � by the . d u property not offer sufficient time �_ individual pr perk► o�arn�ers to react in a positive sense, creating PlOpOSSIS for development concepts. As you. nay be aware, it cut large group interested property owners into � difficult to coals a e of teed r an effective actim program. Therefore, we believe th_ the best dterniative for the (ty at this point is to leave the desipations as they are at the rie�►.,.nt time, that is Commercial Professional, and to allow the %M.Vnd a perty pro a� and interested sty p • patties within the the addition � � to des►*l�► their own ideas. A sirificant amount of creative . t be required CO i. plan for t the number of prtyrwnets meat for utear largC 1�e Plumage that the has g t e area, it is understandable that 90 days ie insuffident time for this ac tivity to ly occur. We agree with the Qty's obiectives k ..a ►. �j a term benefit for th Chi and the for of Providing ` � �' ighUnx�„ a�ast�uudty the p:cp rty owners as what is hayppenult, in the so t they r make t awn plans, create prate► d and cpeveloPment rather than piecemeal develop at, rid ` . nt ire lieve the best way to achieve '! total citizen ipnnalveffie � the o eve r,� ua►t . I VilD Into- j ANO.A. S0C]A1 �Pitr: OE QRC� ^,�C`.N� �k%�i;Ctt a 1 N A�1D CAuR ai�l1 nnu r N`aOi on take am action at this time on the retersion area to designations, but rather, allow the rropertyL OWileS Abe. by the dty. At the very least, we believe this would be a days, perhaps longer. Vie riequest filar the City consider take no action to allow any changes in the comprehensive plan desliOsOo 9 'igar Jef f er sOn Avvenu '. 97223-E 61( July ' 4,. 1990 Tigar't .P lenning 13125: 3h'W. Hal 1 E33'lvo, 'E' �gt�';rd r 0H 37223' RE : n41,2iaprehenaive Plan A►aead`aent ,C ?A^ 90 -0006 IR �i IY rasident'a Parkway Members of the Comaiseion We ,.urge You to vote to reconaend to. the Tigard City ouLici 1 to, change both the coapreheneive asap and text .. de'signat ons back from the current Costaercial` /Pr ,feiesionel beck 4,o i't:te original Residential designations. Doing so. would 4141Llow u ' to be able. to get on with our lives which ere ours^aF,It' ' , on hold . dLi' to the Urban Renewal Plerb, Pre�aident' a Parkway. We originally •supported the President's' Parrkway piss se 'a viable tool for the c t.y to • reciev3 e f irat .cleas , cosi ie'iCal developeent and..',, to subetailt i a l l y increase i to tax base. ML 'tfn,ft ti »:: ; we • signed an option for our howe with. Traaael P Crelw both to alit*: pp. .tby t•o. p.. Y but, eor� iitiporta�ld` e_ ablart�i�af��,k�r��, au ort for the project protection end security that o:r fafaily wo b tit+ relocate within tine Tigard area with hose: pricier Oi&calatintg4 as t!gey are in the sotuthweaf: eeetro area.' Wowever wee did, .on Jti o 13, 1990, receive our opt !xc.)0 wit4 : v ` Traissil Crow back, . ee t^ hey erias • no longer intereated in our 'eret *. ' Even with thia Ou• `future: eti l l en unknown, because of the aL.awetah etween he dos reherse larx and _he current Xo:�icng. We uL cilia ed �a.u� hope three �reeara ages 'b�ecKG aa�* it am en idea.. P eould • location in which to '.ive 'an4,i< i� .plece ',Where; our f0iiill a • r q ° f t . on to; our. houa►a r ; • crow►, We have' e�eaine�� plan+te to sad 900 s � (which will nelirly double itO dtirre: _t i iite) rnn4l contiiieaa liwin„ eer �r to cd►se. However, yoia . , iri oiur current cnet�hb��rh,00d 'for sang y � �. � rn�n ��ur �aa�,�.,�a . th�.: .. l c this all in the pe1e of e d e cit},+► counci 1 �►o ... 'ail of tht banks the I ha�.te 5lkeed *.o cones g ore not w ;l l i,ng' to tZ.+ est reeiaostie1 coney into e's araa *oh: • thy- co*preli,enetve, p1e0h states ebo td tie CQaearical.; Tyt We eg;ein urge you to sec ©iearend. tihe city coulncii changing a p R'ig na1 wdceegnato aen�,d c osta thena� Ve a18,R and text buck to its► o. ive us both a cod bra( ills or n► a 9 • ur 1 ,veer an Qighl�or'h • • • z.re �l91r faiti'ly ere �, .,, to aey that: at�r ur_r1.41!�n0hoib4d,1 is a 1 vdbl'� netighbozfhoc►d worth s€ wing and rwe'sf ing in. 4' e0p.ctfa11'y,�, '1 J Troy 1'. Vandeerhoo, • • .gard Planning Commission /o : ,Tigard Civic Center ;SW Hall Blvd. QR 97223 T:�sc'a'z,*ite Plan Amendmen esidents .Parkway' �x wnm' it may :oncern a ti`s r i -li i Ik .K tie urge y ou to vote to change. e Comprehensive Plan map 1� design tion from commercika professional back, to. resident2al and give us back our home ', and ,neighborhood;. it, the .plan, ill, , ,left as it ` is, you will be sentencing us to a l fe. of perp.tu,,il limbo We will be sitting in a 'home that we c`.. ' t acid on too and can't :::ell because of the commercial status. ' (These / ..a available in our area that was zoned com i merciaia prevouxsly has never been sold.; In 'the beginning , ie would have been willing +'to give up our home, t r uctantly, so �-�..hat' the dream of Presidents Parkway could 'have WO felt that overall <, it wa$ a good plan i that k�ec ©tee a reality. , ,.: • Tigard best thin would benefit the t;'it <y, of Tig�ird: snc�, we felt the tc► ,< do v inajority the people i was to su yport Y - to ''chi � and, t3rinratpi�! ,, it. Ho�e+ver, a vest: na orzt o T:u,ard were very much oppased t s clev+elopment Rp :::ewal This sends a clear mssrttage to' as that developin' area is not what the people want, Therefore, we ask that, you please gigue us,' the opts 1. -vii your consideration by letti g u `move the affected areas, y „, with our lures We have lived in l .m�bo noefor o /et, `waiting w";.1r this al]. to be settled. We need to adld on home NOW in orrler to accommodate our growing willing to do so in ordttr to remain in the area 'we rro love; a f�Jr the su surrounded by the people that we have cared about 11 years. We can' ' do that, however, 'uniess you.. g e e u w our residential status. r'f� ever': AUfiliTY01'. ",,.e:iiittkillE fe,,:.,,,',-,,i,,tutbaiti'*:4,1 • ' ' ,, 1'1'4' • i'.. ioxi r, 4i i i - -'.,(tr:rirliiiii;;Ar4e'*Oneoleyis ,4'',' , I'''',..i.SS.C-1.-",F1. II ' f4a,#4,,.. =§*.liabilentleltir'atiireinpna":urija0,..., '4,..,,,,,,,...;, „, , : Its liaiCtiteC a1 , 4,110,1410461,hlit'iiiiliickioiiitiir,:Ablibetai''''', 1!!!'.*,Y'1?",140,frg'-httCF°*11Sit! Onin:1440,4,',1.:,;4 ,c.e.hiet'siiiiiiite1iiA.00.40:. ':';,''! '. '44' ' . ''' ' ''' ' 4 ” '4 ' ''' ''' '''.4 . ' ■ .., .r''',;','!../,,;',','',',:ri'r.r / b e f i i i i i i i i t t . ' . ; ' '';',.ei.,',.. r44T*Lb■li" .,_,.EkiirOnis 'Si4., _Hfissi 11404.i'-',' io4iteMri ;O:Otteletetit,...-etivitiet.::,''•bbt , : ' . , ', " : ' 1.0 :014c!frPolai- die cleon :'16F'''tho(P.';:',:;`,'Z Atifitgait' ''Ilra' iolididliTarielilire-ii'''' . -,''''','”Iilidnd A101'-'1h0■2.14;10d ros'eb-',;',;',. OeSird'''hit'aleteger-licigiorse,are:(' ,Conc■iived101,110087111,04841itf-Of.,..,.; ,.. . 10.'''. , • -, 'Aiad - ', --`''''''' , ' — — -- eid',ot•itht.ftitida'al.Tieii:raCthi'ioteitt 4; ,':,CifFICSeS .. . it's 'sis,''suk!Ss"S andr10sige,,':'4',' , '4 ., iss,160.:'"! ,.,,, eliniaritsi,snelfici,t0 eattrindiaiii',iiii 4" .,,,:,;.-- 1+,fhteeleginierit ' pocifiellibiiii,„ es,j,Aket ,217,, .,... Hi,Ii,,,:`, , , , "prelentit4 ,' r All of 'the .desIgn,' *laments' hi, : 7,,, . , birtiolutsa,, pir Atiolevard:;andtaitai"iii•iiet ,torit14.thi, inalni., .:',- ,2!.1,4 ' , 09.,-bSS-14 ill's,' ,, siS,'Sh! ann.. kle,,,4 ixii";fpf:, neighbeig4Ori.,:ennarinicial iittiviti,, ,..,,,,,,, ,,, Area ': and '4,apecif.,..,444,74sOffai ,Sna''' 143191!''' ''.,'Int ' 'al1701#1'. in'tititegii,.''liiiigreis;',Iiieltelbig iVeifilagtert ' ''''.,'4',,0141,iii.,,'.111114' *.fsiS17PSCCSSI5A!ISi Siiiiibr!,,:, Iles,, West , of: , Greenberg ,363, 'Vision ',141':4' •' .., .1' . r. . ". ' • r . • ' ,r" * •- ' " ' '' - , L ' ''' . , 1 ' 'ROiiii'V, krist;ii(ibis4tee iirkifiloPintot,a44'''',Atial.',6v,•30scist '00111hi'ar." ilia' dlithit0 '' :,,i'bOiSliiiii''''fa,. Eairlyintenaiet,,rigioaal,tiorinteCial .4., . ', L ,',,,, ,,,I, 'ks'ilo%''COMIE00Fti*0 Min. Same, ate*, ■ilitifii, , ' ' ' 150erpfell'*tilft. ther V:11"014 'Aria PAISInt,' Itle!*t.'r ' ' '1... '''' . ''''''.401.07adrirtik*:' .. ,...,•':0":",,,n,':t:,. , '4*,,,,,, . ' , ,rernoriet, opporttolt4i or othbleint to the'' '',;„ ':'' steurniriiithi'it ),,a.0.10,'■ ' ,'' ,,;',..,,..v(otich.: ■ !1...4lined' fot.nliNi ,:,''::■,4,.:.,11„11f ,ii1.1/',6611, iii. $: eaker,AFI‘W. ,1.6.1414.._ .Il ' '::':,4111401141ilig..,, '...tti(l''''',,' ' . ... , -,', .,' ■,... , ,1 ' leigaili.00111161t;i1411.7.iiiiinlit/illAnial: ',.'"',. P'sF1:0' SI' c'esSI`IR'S1,111"- doPrISPI!! Is cf!'•°4 .. , '' ' ds•14,01.11''''Shk,-. ,..'-' '',, r '',4, , , , , ' '1,4ds0444,74-040,80.444iiikitill't Ji13110 ' ; : ' '4',,f6s SGteselr..00+■474,1"afta,:cOall*ta4andior,'4:, , . , ei it:#soio,,,,,,,,,Ir., ''',Iiiiiiiii4.14iifi.1110.761,464044,'.' ' , ' 4 ' ' ' : .; ' ' '111" i'Z'SI'le:r19"'' fft ' IlliPtIta°......r.::4..,. ' '..... 4 ' '' 4 ' ' ' . rt An, '.4TAL'',74'4'.' anotinitlea, A Ma! fi , $ ''PHIPSt ',C1k.1!..... '..."'' ' . I A .(.. .r' .9 '1‘ ,,,111*;' :Whim jii0Faiiitotteal. a .*:.-0,,*)ot ilapiaa, apelelia., , ' ii*Ii ar!°4,, A4iic..11, 1:,'00:., kills' '10&:1111eVelfi., .:',,, , •'-,'.iteplit',.te.*111* CI 1, Iiiic,,g4,4,,Lid ta proviei „ of.desigato kt, AIII'llft,10.actkolti",klit ittj ,' '.',,,.,, .„ itaeheitid:"ioetti.,'''„ fo$ rialsOtheed**iiier.;■ 0■6-1,100Velibt -ORO:, :' 'Ple,1,`.7/4-, P!')4661. are BM" 'ttl*,',', ik461,''' ' '' -'' , f.lI''60c. '' '':,',' ,' ''''' ' : . r' ''''.. : ' • ‘. ' '' ' , . fee i'aii ikii'' OpPifitiiiik14 ii,ildWire readl!,1, , . '11Psc!.S.1441*•$-Igs ootIllds rifttfo _47,a 01, .,,,,4,', ..'44' ',:',4' ' 4 ,r .''''',L:..f.'''''''',';', r'.:, ' , '0:: r‘r•It',.', ici,kilibie to,,,memisoi.,4ishooairiii;„. ,,morapver,(;, . 'Sisetaalir,c1:1110.1* are .11kaed and :IonCorirS,i'•?0,, : rl g,,,'•/4141!' 0101ilaPint4 " '' ' '":' ' . :,.., H' '• _,, •. n : : , ' , ',. ' , ' '. 4 ' nn' ' n L r "r pidethe iiiesoia,,,i;1„.1riii,;,\ticl,,,t..:irfnai!iihiti.!!„:,,,i.1,2124.,:billikittri... •1 -4,, ,, ; 114, „,,.,,,:, 7" )1V. ,r ' 7 te, ,11,jaPLI,,,,,'','4. .,','4,,, ' ,4'..,',..::,4.,,,',''.'„,LI;i144*delite:Ii°60,:its,ticircIlit411:es:'e"tent lib•,,',:':" '",r,' 4 n ' : : :',' '1' r,' n. : .::• :I, ''''''-'1:", ''',',' '''''' ' ' :4-' ,t''' ,'., '''': '•:: '' :.' '' ' 'n r 'n''' n' . .,:, : ' , , order an educe tie', 'etle.,..er ' 310,, , tooirl,0,, 2: ,,,,, , ,,,' Clef. i_. JLILL,O.A.,es 4,,Elantr.. f■I. .:,. ' ''.,„___,.,' '17:e;`, ',dents' rNst, Mike tri,N0!Ifi' MP.. ""unler , ' 4 i in.4:the design,etEnar.,, . , ,.:.".",, , „, ,,,,, „.piin:Tiii,-04 , residents ',,,,.yesittOi,, the.' C„.11',1Ss2 .!1/ "nalei,' '4, ''',1 ataai,dralitilis h1.4"0,, 4r,v44,`,",,14i, , ,'., ' '. "iiikee 44 umill:'..,. - ''. rociste'ler"Int_,... --.....""...'""val :d '. streams and RhilifJr1,b41806 ,--,,,, ' ,. comivos, snnte ilaffierli. i II ‘ie ti thk1' gear' oll s,.. ....00lf: • ' ' iiit'.. mkploreas— stool ihrf..!'r i ..' n. I •.iitii. ' i. ',. . ' ' ''• ' n , 't " 1 n In 1 . ' -. ' • :$7411:‘1,CiSeiglielftlal,f;Par :" 14ili.iiP !illabileried' r ' ' In .the ' ''' ' ' : ' ' ' ' r'ilitIteiitat2041=Ytttiterill °i?14'"di •:" ''''P7doZ;c144 i''' n , , I ■ , '" • . "'n' :1,4: i !, ,:, ".-. ",!•,", r, , r , •," T11. ;deeelearrant 411,01;14,10r ,sin Of01itess/ „r ( '■'' '' .1' ...L ehithingtna,.Squart portion of the Opining , is toes ta 4accent, define, or separate ,' „ ' 16,,,,T!insPe.4tm,',;, Area is .,,cotillnuini dentkeirnent as an ' . , . , , . , ',atlas'. of differint, tit similar. residere' , , , ilksitilit to', the ' • ' ' and /Alf •g olsnned ' '-' 'fisiditt7.47.arne .',”" '' :: n • ' n \ r'r," ' :. ' ' Aitenti4e regional pranolle conanetclill. ' 4 4 ' ' tlal densities ,4 tr, . . , , , cotntit, rtayintot,'*!i.ontiene to be ' ' ; r. , , J. , land ,.. , , , , , ; , , ;, integgited With de" f4''Aii '4134 414d4cfr".c ' 1' I 4, Mid and' ' rotecieti to enhance the ' ,ar 'Pt r moor ,tirzto of cor'llfs:11.1/ b°1 MO den.' ' ,,' , , te, social, wildlife, 'open Space, '. , treas. t tr'reSidettiat tette. ' .*OethitegOlt. &feet/J. eliti r ' • ' ' " . n , ■ tan i. ,iet 1 thi ' ' ' .,110riiiinela and •' '4iirt?:•:its was are inisiblib 4 to' cOmirt4 ' ' .,, ' sC„ en_ IC! ""l'uandt °°°,, ,," ,° .' '' ..„\'''' brie' .41,4:::'' dr,,,,- developing 6-3 ,:., ngional ccenaterclai center , , 1, , , , , . with appropriate inieceilivb Osib•'' 4 ' ,' ' ' '1, . , r . ' ', ' ' . ,4 ' r i r " A i ' I ' , ' ' , Otte the' "testi: '., Orientation. Of the ono In 040 area rare ' , ,,,,, IF utatifirepproprlate, IntercOhnetted as , , * ',31ireitgb,,t14',,as. N. Intended to tie baietid,the iti4harey 317 ' ' '4 4: pert of a path and open ripatellyitele. iarea et transitin betweee inteetiee uses '.' '. OlihirCit' Valli. OCCIVOMOdiltift 111+0' ' 44' , 44 4 , ,," ' ' j : ' 1 A 4 2 ' !loiter Manning ,..rriary tis of planned , inei shall tiar■i, :4' , ,,,, , ' -, '44 .,1 ' :,' 1' ',r1" "n ':' ,'•' ■ ,''' Greink:it lane titter, „..,.......6 servas.as an getoune as a rmianii of prOtettinit the ' ,iiesterri.' ,' ,' ',' , , ,, ' ' • , '', f ' ' ,,,, ,,,44 ,',. r ; ;1 ' r : r r ' : ',n' ' n:r ' VW aten hwitiente Metzger bild Wathineton , Daeirlepinerit 'proeriiTerat int' Itenddt, . „ , ,tirilniedio, ittio,, SquilitiOtogress nilems:GiOetturg lio....?1,1 Eid ' ,"alteil be required for 'dieveligreent cy.,i land ,,, r 'IriighWay ,anfiki, ' ' . r "" 'r • ', r'' iJT , " ' . n ' n. ;,‘ + 63 be eiiid, siii■ii inba tha, eili','Icerit' ,birildatile pOrtion shall be efinie.cd 00f • , iti.:Itifei Iota , • „ , , , `ta,the welt and ioNver denalti inet,On the ' ' illieelOpititti. ‘, Ott exception `es thie , la-Ne.0101tCete 'ail ', , ,' 1 ,, ,,':' ,‘-'' ; ", , , ,, 'H• , ',, ' ,'' , ,, , at the interseettoes Of Held ikaieverd and ' tthith includei 'a diniticent Serkt:ii ' ' ' , orleated.tit 'the, ,' '' .' 4 ' ' '1 ..1A :' . ' ,.' . . ' 1. '4',' ■ ' A . east, ' Anila otottice,',Inieltetiontil end tragiliriiiiint itall' 44 'aito.ved it 'ail Of , ,, 1 CollectOrs„,shail iiiiiii,;00 compatiwa 440 motisoi. ,, ' iequirea, biit ,ii encoutaled. , A cientiti , ; ;I:''1,1413ied 01.1°1' Tore:01144in' density +resiiilerialai oi.:.. ,•!is , ;the Signitietnt l•--...fai, fieirarke alto it' , ' in ,the,Cornitaim '', , i , ,, '1, ' .,,'... , , 4,,,, '4' , . 4' ,, r. • .ther'Peoliresibltimhill* Snearritaritrtial , iladicatiOnOt ebb' open apaCe it not - ,, ', 4 ,Shiod or pi:Ai,' '' 4 ' ' ' r '4' ' ''' , ' ' : ," '''' '4 ' ks', ''.. ' • '' 'r, ' ,. :rethitetlat uses. the urea lit Of; hitt:Mid trisriefir trete the' resource area to, t , lament. tee . ,. ,.ittai,ii -intended ,te be,'117-.:i 4 Suppe/tied' of , , letilnint as ,.!!‘iii *Kee Rablic , , ' provislirrie on C , n ` r ", n n ■ . '. : ', - ■ n , r , , , ,, ....,, • "" • ' In "nr , "i': "'• ' ' residentiai area. ' ' : , any 'tignilikent''Nettirel'itesobicit' site as , i ',' ; , taCilitiei,4anie otoeialei in the, tOeinitiaity. tavarlopritent ' :tinfeeSibito Tat transportation system is ail important aspect of the 'iletzgeroPtingnris tcoviernity fletatise several radio, roantraverse the area betveten,heighboring population indoreplanniint Centerio' numbers of regional *fork, and shopping trips ere reidietch Wry thrn4h !lanb1011 A,791: il:::11=iert.Obiective• el cotk.,■;*,„, ‘14410.4ierit Cnde1 IoN9srate 16eil stiett iiite from the ihe thrusih eratlic, activity innuinOtotei On; oi,114P 0"4.ei ie the county tiso ppett,'sglete, shall be ,titeti tor ,a4baiiiR'ii, titl tikeetiti bited recreational activities e the Pri7ttictiOrr ' ,reeeseres is afar of **AMU* habitats, scientific tircuist.hin Iasi retearch, or KAhetk,purPirsesi gavel is ts, us** to fat stank .eleart. ' 1 , . tentera. 4 Trees, locatritl INelthin a Sigiiiticent 20 , Ottiir attliniiif,t0 ttztt,ral Re-eat'et :he :hill reat 12.61 ,4 1,4 .15.,.. ..inii,•4 T 1 , , • ''''' , ' litnitieed thole ,g velocritest permit t tor incliellad ire Sr*. *010voini hivInii tirot t;'.4*i otitainedi ievinisitti ti ;a ,,,,A.■44,...4 4,4, ii-Ati,,,, :4.4 (•;.,....,,ii,1:.: .4,..ii.trAiniiihoi,i i, , ' ,', ' , .;, .• 1 • " ' ' " ' 4 „ BouodarY for the !triad thl,t was' rsdot2oated from gosidelitial to CommeroLal/Progoosional, ho scale / BOunderir for the doecelPtnet Development plan area.