The URL can be used to link to this page

CPA 89-05 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. ®� F TIGARD 1 s 11610 �C1 7441.,,�r lagnilE PLAN WZCaSL +. E Z t L, 'ORD ANC ►. ��, ? CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -417. tor 1, GENERAL INFORMNTION lolls" q ; ka PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCAT10N ,e E Sate oi: Or 2 n, County of Washington,, City of Ti ga TAX NAP AND TAX LOT tCT® 8 09 ft of lot 1002 lot `g le1.Q R 7.3rLa; ° °zak..mz2d 912 S ®.u4 a 15Q0x. ,i'L rt -o 2000. SITE SIZE ap mlinate1 Y 92 92,5oliset PROPERTY OW'N'ER /DEED NOl DER* ,.a Exh i h _ ADDRESS' PHONE ib t B CIT7ALL_Iigazd APPLICANT* CroWv Oregon ,a. .... lric. . .�..........e sewn..... ADDRESS 10260 S.W. Greer bOt^g r"cd e, PHONE , 245 =9400 %IP '97223 v CITY Til'ard ZIP 97223 *Then the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with itiritten aua horimation from owner or an agent of the owner with v itten authorization. The, owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided of Page two e submit a written authorization with this application 2. PROPOSAL SAY The owners of record of the subject property request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (if applicable) from to and a Zone Change from R -5 ti C i* OR The. applicant requests to the following secs :ions, of the Comprehensive R1z mr Comaunity Development Code �.e..:� 0737W723P Ptevre d: 5/87 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO+ ae" e OTHER CASE NO'S: ,tea RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: L DATE: Applie tion elements submitted A) plication form (1) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Applicant's statement (pre -app check►. list (D) Filing fee (t i2.) Additional information for Comprea- a have Platt Map endmerte /Zo:ae Changes E) Maps indicating propery location (pre°°LPP check, list) (F) List of property owners and addresses with' 250 feet (1) (G) AaseSsor'a M (1) ,(I) Title tranaf r instrument (1) DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: COVE. PLC /ZONE DESIGNATION — AI.P.06 Number: naming Commission A.Aproval Date: .,�w�ail Yri+ar�ssi ` wwa.ena .°o= �r.rarW.s City Council Appro a te:° If the appiicailon granted th all)111,41:6'Pt exeFielle the righci ' d with the terms and ' subject all the iconditions ' and granted actor ance limitations of ther'approval., • • , • The'• aplicant has read the ',entire 'dantant4, of the, .14)•iliti•Ot".4tiOrt„ including the policies and criteria and • understands the -reqiniteMentS.,,f',fori, aopro0:44. or denying,' tile. ,applid4tiort.,,',', '•'., • ,.• • , ,•,, • • • • . ,;„ • , • , , • , • • SIGNATURES of each owner (ego husband and 4ifa). the subject „property,f, • • • •. I I ' STA E OF,OREGON County of Washington' City of .Tigard her• b y certify lease Print) That I an ax That I served notice of the Tigar:` City '.Council for the . City' of Tigard, Oregon. (Marked Exhibt. A:) upon a a+ch of the following of which the attached is a �� fl' by; mailing to each named persons on the day of �9 li �, �_,.�. of them at the addreats shown en the attached list (Marked Exhibit S), said notice is hereto attached, and desposited in the United States Mail on the otary ,Public of Ore on My Commission Expires ` :i"""'qY i A/ � hailed 'Notx <ce /Del.a.ve d to POst Office viotttltiotiobto ,cl � fro ` �' en to before me this i -°° da±! of ✓'' ,``'wl'' °° r+✓O^ w at ° , , , " � °' ` r ° w ' dtary Public of Ore • 11 `'� My Commission Exiires. CF OF FINAL DEcISI - Er cITY cooNciL • COficeraing Case Number(s): CPA 59 ®5 /ZC 89 • Name of Owner: -avers Name of Applicant: -9.rsMr Orecxon r Inc e • Addaffee 10260 SW,`ggag a r Rd. City 2igard State OR Ztp, X223 • Address of Property: 9220 9260 9330 Low °_10175, 92nd1 9225° 9255. eamieleaf .. Tax Nap and Lot No (s) .: 181 35A4L. tax lots 7QQ ,15,x,1. 7®2 : S1 and_parttLat.2MMD and 1002 ..�wa. . Request: Ai re,aueg for, Coin Eghensive Plan Amedment from. Low Density, ,4. �,."- ,.�.,� �.al �.5 unite acre try Zone Champ from Iteae�. � t ail .to Pr ®fe ®�� oval Commercial anti a 5 „�tge3 dent c- ' ,,. t Pro €e . sional CoMmercial fO9 ~parcels totalling ate r t glv 1. �4 acme. Ale reaaee tad amendment to ' the T;rJ, c��r et� Proctr ®�►® Corrmunit Plan to a v.eehs alignment of Lincoln Street,� �. ▪ Action: ac Approval as reque ted Approval With conditions' Denial ▪ Notice: Notice w s p blished in the new ®paper, pi®ted at City Hall, mailed to The applicant, and owner(e) Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Af wec°.ted' governmental agencies at S. Final Decision: THE DECISION WAS SIGNED ON June. 12, 1989 ? BECOMES EFFECTIVE of ,,June 12 89 and statement of condtio s c o The adopted findings 'of facts decision, asa'. P g n� �n �; obtained from the Planning Department, Ti card city Halle 13125. SW Hall', . luu � . , Oregon egon 9" 223. P.0. Boy 23397, Tiga`� A review of With the Oregon Land decision se Board toe of Appeal L in i to the L1� �y�aCCO�dnCatJ...+0 l intent ( Procedures. • QUESTIoNg ,: If You have any cllueStiene, p ease cal]. the' 'T3 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON ORDINANCE No-,89 AM ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE Two comPREEENsIV.E PLAN AMENDMENTs AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTS (Croy -Oregon, Inc-) AND AN AHENDHENT TO THE - Y;I�CY (CPA 89- COMMUNITY PLAN DECLARING AN EMERG AN �T2�ER PR��SS 05/ZC89.O5) . -Or ova, Inc. has recqueet �d a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medina Den Crow-Oregon, g Residential to commercial Professional on app ximat t + Rasi� to �P R-12 _ 2 »xis ��m:�ro ) acres and � zone change from -�.2 arlm�•t for �iC�pr�h ®� 3.�e Plan Amendment (Commercial. Py^acfeea±ional,) f also a � ®qu from Low Density Residential to commercial Professic al and a Zone E-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 „ , to C -P on pproxiaately ..8 from finally, an amendment to the fig;: zger- Progress Community Plan to change the alignment of SW 93rd Avenue (Lincoln Street); and R plunnLn . staff made recommendation, of findings' to .the City of �� ° the g Tigard Planning commission at a public hearing. on Hay 2, 1989; and WHEREAS, City public hearing on t&n �- proposed changes Council 'held a P may 13, 1989 to reviews Planrn. -Ag staf f,? and planning commission the Tigard Cis ®n a recommendations as well as Public testimony. W NOW, THEREFORE, T CITY OF T/GARD ORDAINS AB FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all .relevant criteria based npon, the f cis, findings, and conclusions noted below: FACTS 1 o Loca n 9220° 9260,09330 SW Locust Street; 10175 EN 92nd Street' 9225 °. P255 Mapleleaf Street (WCTM 1S1 35AE, tax lots 706e 701, 70Z, 500, 501, 900, and parts of 2800, 2901 and 1002) 2 . Eackcarounad lnforman ub:.. ect properties were annexed to the dity of Tigard in lat,O A ril 1987. Prior to the annexation, tyro land: use :. � v�ons the �. application. F ° aennt a Special 'Use Permmit) were f Ll City �preh��ndive 'Plan'. �miefndar agreed at that time between the Washington County. Also, it was a �rauld and Cogan cy that all applications in process at the county continue even if thS final decision occurred after annexation (ease No. 87- -73-HI to use desi� nation from R-5 (Residential, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and zone Change (Case ° 5 units acre .- ) extension ot change the land u>e � ci.al on Parcels and Ina tely north of Guy Strewn and west of Lincoln Street immediately no wad approved by the Boiled of Comaissiomars on Hay 19, 19816 ORDINANCE No. ;89 -, Page n 'r Z9, special Use Permit for -; parking . let (Case k o. 87- 122. -5U) was, granted by the Cevni ty on May 13, 1987, for tour residentially zoned parcels located at the southwest corner of Locust Street and 'Lincoln street. The residences on these properties were removed and a parking area was developed. The conditions of approval imposed by" the county remain in effect. Also, aaince thi property lax been ,annexed and the City does not allow commercial parking lots in residential zodbe, this portion of the Lincoln Center parking let i a nonconforming use. On May 18, 1987, the Tigard City Council approved the rezoning of the annexed area in He'zger from Washington County designations to City designations w t,i.ch ' mtost closely re®emblwd th= County zones. Tbin ordirance (No. 87 -22) became effective on June 18, 1987. Subsequent reviews utilized the City Community Development ' Code rather than the County regulations. A Site Development Review (SDR 87 -08 and V 87 -07) was .conducted ' by City staff in June, 1987' for an aPProval to construct a. 12 -story office building.' It was approved = abject to 16 conditions. In June of 1988, the Bearings Officer for the City of T1r4are .approved a Conditional Use permit 'request to allow the construction of a rooftop heliport atop the 'newly constructed Lincoln Tower office building. This application wagi approved subject to 23 conditions, In Mamba, 1389, the Director's deeigne PProved with conditions a regMe t for several lot. line adjustments and a minor land.. partition creating a new tax lot at the southwestern corner of the Lincoln Comer property. (1M 89-08/14Lp89 -05) . . Vicinit nforsmation Refer to the zoning map, attacUed to this report as 'Exhibit A" . 4. site ,_Xnforma, The Lincoln Center property is 'presently developed with six office buildings with a gross _ floor area of approximately 830,000 square feet and two paizking structures on a total of seven , parcels b Tax lot 900, lies at the northeastern corner of the property and. is. currently zoned R-12 (Medium Density Residential, . 12 unitd per acre). tmmediately north of it i - a * ortion of tax lot. 1002 which.. is, also zoned R-12. Stith parcels - y Lincoln street and area of tar lot 900 and the portion of tax lot 1002 (a ®ro , tel � 3250 s ft. is proposed t ( p� � .. y cI ) P.. to be ro:.desigarated as C -P (Commercial Pa.ofesaional) The appiican "c also proposes to change the compr ahensive plan ana ion ing deai7nation of eight residential parcels (approximately 1 8 acres) elaliately to the east of Lincoln Center' consisting of the block bordered by Sirs Locust street to the north` SW 92nd, Avenue to the east, W _Map1eleaf to the south and sW Lincoln Street to the west, portion - .. 01. which are west, as well as a of �� A 1 ��+ 2� ®0. fiYiW �� Page 2 located at the eoutheaet, corner of.' Map1e1e f and Lincoln. Tam Bats 2800 and 2901 are lacluded because the proposed . r iligna eni % Lincoln ' street will cause portions of the ®e" .lots to , lie ` 9 2md,wit h the crOw-firegon property. These Parcels afire all 'currently zoned and. developed! &e R-4 5 (Residential/ 4.5 unite 'per acre) . The applicant states that these ate3Ageaa are needed so that a n =w, 125,000 eq uarr Y foot office building, called Lincoln Center Five, can be constructed at the northe ;: atl;a,'r n portion' of the Lincoll.n Center property and meet City of TiOard Community IDevelopatent Code requirements for a euffiOient nt9.��be,C of on site parking spaces. It is anticipated that a two - >...ory parldinv etruoture will be constructed upon the land bordered , iapieleaf and 92nd by Lincoln, �+ SW �ocuet, Linc Avenue's. P'1.nal.117, th appl, cant is re esting an amendment to the Metzger Coarzaimity Plan' so that the 1catior of Lincoln Street. can be changed so that 'it would be aligned WLtyi 92nd Avenue at Locust Street. The existing section of Liuc�ln Stre. � between � �p 9eleaf an d Lrcsst ,is proposed to be vacated. R. PIN', INt i AND C ®NCLUSI0r'l8 The relevant criteria, in this tease are Statewide Planning Vials 9, and 10 and City of Tigard CoaYapar pensive Plan policies 1.1.2 i nplementaticn Strategy 2, 2.1.1, 5.1.1, 5.1.4, 6.1.1, ' 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 7.6.1 7.7.18. 8.1.1, and the Location , Criteria for Commercial Professional designated :area® (Section' 12.2.3.5),, and the general design a O y, lan. eneral deed. eel :e�nente ®t the kDetr er P re�s� i.o�unit p The City Council concludes that ,the propoeai is caned tent Y with t .applicable Statewid Coals baatd upon the ao1lowir. : f indinge a Gotl 1 is met becau ®e' the City has adopted and' fol .oa ®.: aati oiti €en involveiuent 0#0g;,604 which HdO*610P0ent development appIicatianu by -the, Neighborhood Planning ' organizati+on. 1n addition, al.1 pt lie aotioe rec item ®nt® ha ve been t for the eubJedt applic:vtion. • Goal 2 is stet uae the City hate a$1.3.od all appticah'1� statewide 'Pl arcing •Coale r City Corprehenaive Plan ; policies, d • co Unity Develop pent Code r =pax aaz nt i in revie bf the app1i0 tion. . the er t ha ,City' . Coal 9 Le . .met because th$ g�ro►ea1 +W�auld fo�at commercial business c nnA ty thereby incr aae ,gag 'econolnia opportunitiee within the City. • Coal 10 le' eatisfied. benauao, althbtrgh the Propceed action not significantly , red i200 the aanottft of reei dentiaii::y dandignated d in the City, it will taot affeCt the city t i. e e tooplianco with GAR Ckaagrx6: r 660, Div.3 aiOa tae iiettsPOitL o W �i0u ®ing Rtx1 ® s re+ir�erlta� f:�r nay Cb` rnaatetib►n reeidentia1 density for new construction. ' This, s recausS the 0eDINAN0R N . 89-r7 Page 3 w six parcels contaF' ing the ' single Emily dwellings area, presently developed and therefore is not considered buildab land in the Comprehensive Plan. The two remaining residential p' :cell (TL 250® and 2901) ' are owned by the Tigard school Dietr% c and are not y:vailabie for residential use es reflected' by the Institutional Htetzs,er- Progress Plan designation. The city council concludes that the proposal is consistent with , the wi applicable Comprehensive Plan policie t based upon the following f indin�o�® m 1 Policy 1.1.2, Xmplementation Strategy 2 (aleo found in Cade. Section 18.22.040 ), require that applic tione of this type be consist. -nt with relevant policiea o, the Comprehensive Plan; not have an adverse affect health., slfety , and welfare of the cQ unity; be consistent ' with, etat i�`- planning goals; and ah that There is evidence of a change ien the neighborhood' or a mistake or inconeistenoy in the Comprehensive Plan cr toning neap. Th e applicable Policies, statewide gu le, and the health, safety, and welfare of the tom tunity aze addressed addressed in the. discussion that follows. iN number of physical changes es in t he coax g ru school neighborhood, dencjd by the comnerc,al construction and accelerated commercial. activit y immediately to the west and on the periphery of , the subject area; have occurred.. since the adoption of the Metzger - Progress community ran . in 1983. • This growth in coalaerci :,1 development has proceeded as envisioned in the Plan, however several changes from residential to commercial zoning designations war approved *'by the County' since 1983. These recent developments have created a, need to reaeoeoe the zoning designations in the area, and it apaaars that sufficient changes circumstance ta�noe have occurred to th® ro sal. P Po 2. Policy 2-1.1 is satisfied because NPO #8, CPO #4 and surrounding property given arin q and an opportunity to com a� t on the appii cant' a proposal 3. Policy 5.1.1 is satisfied because the - dditiona1 c rciaal land area added to the City's land bas .as result of this prOpo a1 will foster the creation of new employment opportunities for Tigard residents and correspondingly boost the city oconomyo �. Po y l �.c , 5.1.4 indicates that coareefal and industrial uses aho old not encroach into residential neighborhoods. This PrePosal will result in an are zoned C -P which will abut, land zoned R -4.5 to th = mirth, east, and south and would. represent encroachm nt. However, in this e::ase, there is only residential development on the north side cf Locust Street and the Xetzgor school property is adjacent e n the east and south ha a practic =1 matter, this requelvt will not encroach upon gray existing residences in any significant because of d4he Physical. separation Provided by the school propr -ty and LOosst ORDINANCE fled. 8 - Page e . 4 Street. The si= residential properti - is east . of 93rd street are uniganel1 surr^cunded by .; commercial and institutional lend uses on three sides. The dwellings have already been adversely affected by the adjacent commercial use and are a oaaewhat isolated from the neighborhoed by the school Property and Locust ,street. The leedesignation of tax lot 900 and the northeastern portion of lot 1002 ;4,411 basically convert land which is presently , being used ai a e�icolitf ®rming parking lot into a conforming oxa on commercially zoned, land. Other comprehensive plan amendment and zone change applications h ve been pplroved where a [ pro.- existing to exist in the city thereby use could be id ®identified t establishing precedents for this case. • Polic y . 6.1.1 is sat/. fied because the City's diverasifiee- housing 9 of six s�te3eck w�.al not be ssdignif,castixntly affected by th® ].� ®,� si.na3le faMily reaidencea., The City coantinua to : authoirxe building p1 r*ita► for single fcamily 'reaiia'iencesa at an average rate of app rox ,gym tely 200 tO 300 ,iE'ier year. The less of 4 residences occurred oti tax lot 900 and th e , portion of tax lot 1002 when this area committed atill. rtaneti��.�gter':, , under Washington County jurisdiction. It is now Parking lot use y satisfied upon future doveloPmeant of the as rea. . policy ale �. �� La �e� Site development review provisions wrt 11 require th t buffering, , and screening be provided between any future commercial development Pn the area to be redesignated and the existing. single, f fil y residences e® e�.t o� W:92n d Avenue and north of Locust Street. • Policies 7.1.2, 1.3.1 and 7.6.1 are satisfied beca1 a adequate pubio facilities (e.g. sa u tart' sewer and water] exist: tco serve the site. Tiny nevi develoPment on the Lincoln Center proVerty 'or on the residentially sinned properties will be requui.re�d to connect to those systems as a condi ti on . to dev ►1opment.. Public ag g nr,pi ®s providing these facilities will be notified and given the opportunity to comment on any future development proposals, on the affected parcels, thereby also satisfying ,Policy 7.7.1'.` • Policy 7.2.1 must be addressed at the time of develoPment becavae adequate storm drainage facilities do not exist to � serve the • mite. Th i e sngnsering` Division has c: rated that storm drains would _ need to he installed and that the i.notallat .an could occur at such time when .i3W 93rd "%ven a is smtended 'south to, all Oak Street. 1N. Policy 8.1.1 satisfied' because the street .t.. rove menus needed to serve the develoPaaent of the subject property will bte provided in oon jnncticn with Site plevolcOment Eaview approval. The Council concludes that the amount of poteenttal of f is develo. N..`sent, faith the deed restriction gu ` . i.ction r� fired as n , condition of Lpproval, will not be affected °by this application. Vhe O DXNANCB'' NO. 89- Page 5 �,i • 1 Engineering Division has coimmented that an iproved traffic circulation plan be adopted' before : additional commercial development . is allowed to occur',. The Council , finds that this plan should b$.dkeve1oped in the near suture* however, it dose not appear necessary to prepare this plan, prior ' to the 'a oc this applicationo pp ®val' . The applicable locational criteria for commercial, Profeeeional development are sati efi -d for the following reasons: a. Spacing and Location The locational criteria state that e commercial professional area -ma Y �' t be bordered by residentja. n properties on more than two sides. Tlh ; affected parcels are adJacent to other reaidentialLy zoned .parcels on one Bide onrby �. , to 'tae north. The six residentially ,coned parcels are already surrounded by commercial professional and Tigard Schmo1 Pi L act land 'on three °idea. Th proposed ' radeSignation ►:.:irld not alter • this situation. Moreover, it would result in a more even and' consistent _ boundary • between. the commercial and inotitutionai zones to the south and the residential r prortie® •to the north. Jigsaw puzzl ed z dnr3ae. la now the • oa:le in north Tigard and in this ®p ecific case, results in C4 •. inadequate buffering between use types ,and. could' result. LGe variances to buffering requirements.. A clear and straight demarcation between the commercial and institutional are a to the south and the residential p re ® north side of s bscuat :treat might ultimatel involve less land u ra buffering and fewer vari�ioea to these requirements. Therefore, this criteria has been met. Access The traffic study submitted by the applicant assumes that the property which is the ub ject of this application will only' `be used for parking to accommodate a proposed 125, 000 e ogi' is guars foot of/( !ice building on the ��,row-�'dregon property that is 'Presently zoned C -.P. The Cit Council agrees conclusion relatin to the is h g y pro acted mmouant the ®f traffic ®t will be generated by the proposed 125,000 which foot oi fi.c® develo ent. The report indicates that this p b� 1 5 a i�Ii� s are f sasses proposal 3.�i . P P proceed parking g but ary to Provide for .• a refer�.�l �.� arrangement lbu that could p.»oceed without the zonae, chang e., The applicant � office pro act oou agreed place the property being rezoned 40 .hat. it only may be sett.. .. �' �nt�e�a i.et3.an on t � �' for '.Qs thereby limiting th traffic generation potential of this application. ®' The specific impa ^te created .. ,� � L� pre +� off3,� ;�uildingr maim be evaluated during he i.te tie � h v`eita e t ' The realignment , p rat Revifaw recess. of �i.ncoln Street ( a minor caai.letor) , conetitutee a minor change to the Metzger -Progreze Cirf` ulatios ORDINANCE NO. 89- Page study. Mavis g : ita ' locat on . on LocuEt Street approximately 200 feet to: the a'aaa t will tot have „a, detrii entaai ' iaa ?act on' - traffic; careu ,at ion � 0. Site ' CharadteristielJ ire that the affectad ' Th ®', cite eharac�. ®r3.Stica criteria ra�u sites be of a size which can PkO0Ommo d to , preSent . a& PecJeated needs and that the site have higb4 ` ieibi.lity. ,Thy ,inortheastern :y. lot 900 have ' lready been.' caancorner _ � '. of tax lot �, ®�'!� nnd. tax of � �. r cos i tted' ,L,o a parkinTog- lot use. I wovere , the .Tigard unity Development. Code does not consider. ', parking lots ae, a permitted nee in the R-12 2:o0e or' any aaf .`t ae` ' eeidenti,al '2onea. This "ea of ,approximately 3250 sq. it ie ;large enough to accommodate a very stall scats ®raiel ;deve1opmeidt,s however, the lot size ',would be nonconforming:, It Le ►wore likrely, that this area will. conti.mtE .. to be used an a 4,arking lot, Or even a e � building �g ee t aak ' ar� o, for a larger d,evel4otteefg in coaajunction with the Lincoln Ce dto t The size of the eight ra®iden; itZk y zoned-Parcels is 1,ari enough to aocc odate a con ercial professional development (1. " acres). n r en mire Assessment %ithout an actual detailed development Proposal, difficult to Ei0034304 whether the sale of development On a property will- be compatible with adjacent ueea. Doth of the subject areas of this report are small enough to prohibit soon, extremely. large 'rsoale development and during development review it can be required that the northern .property lines of both a„veae be screened . with tall vegetation on trees such that the pt`ivaacy of . roeeidentia]. properties 'can be Vt,aintained. There are no 'uric/sae site ,features of either site wk i,'411 could be incorporated ,into a development plan. However, adjacent land uses such as the school and nearhY raoai dential ProPartioe could ' b TM well served by adequate e d vale ent roview recee ` buffering and rbcreen3:n9,s the �. it � cen. beet addrreeo relay t d .off -site impacts a any commercial' devela cent on these cta e much '_ as :Dims, glare, aasad lights. The City is aloe in the probe ., s of drafting nett notae provisions • for commercial develops ent that is to abut residential areas., 11. The Metzger-Programs Community Plat The Metzger . it Plan ceteiie general and Progress Community ejeerifi c guideline° for the area bordered by 'SW gall El ,; to the east and north, SW Greexnburg Road to the west and Highway 211 to the south. The plan testators that aOffice aConc arcial Ugee (now deaai grated de Commercial .Professional uses) are planned mainly at Hall Blvd.r and ' O eeon Road and along the east side of, Greenbur'g Road to SerVe both support of and as a transition from the Major eta x ,, urea to the west." General design elements,. inentiOned ice. the p)a relevant' :. � le includin b.3i. ; proposal,,,, at ion o� 'yct ©ira� an w�trk�i �acil %ti,sa Limit this , +� � a F g ad , hours f spar °RD /NAN CE No. Page light-generating commercial deve1O *tent, path Ways can all be , imp1i drtti at" the r deva1OPf ft review. �` .t not; that the ; ; tan states a"t�nt o " � �� "transportation planning! shall integrity of �he Metzger resident 4 canowo4ty.. ''',"traIos traffic and non-local , traffic to . ;frou cr 4ave3opment shall, be , routed t a system and not through th :residential n�� +�� . " the city w3:tY� .: �°he .; dee4 council concludes • that this proposal, . , , .;. restriction proposed by the applicant will 'consietentt re with the 'intent a this 'Plan. �=ION 2: The City C®nnc31 ,upholds the pla. n ning :neion F r oiendatian for approval of the ►p rehehSivPlata I .and , zoning Nap As .set forth in E h its, ,�d Use Map ect to the following ,'B" and "C" (maps) and aubj conditions licsnt e�i71111 recur a �'d , r str3, ,,l, fib® �� G„ that �eetritrUts � th.�� uee;< of. approve % by tie ��u►da�ty, ®1, laarce3.®' 1 1 3.5 tat , " 7 00, 501, 600, ,. r700, i and 702 for ,parking, �1 pu oralee ', only. that,-,,',the tht� �oc�e�►ehte 3 s tnaaiaanuc . D ' SECTION � as, �.� ia� neeess p rOp®o�d by the a plplic t csn structei, :with the 1eart poseiblo deay, in, ordel , to complete .tbe iiyorovcnte durinc th® current • con ®tructtof Season, r ency is hereby docla`ted to ' i at', end. this at, dinaUC oball 'hect. a off ct3.ve '-'141016diOtOly, upon paasag0 and approval bk the council. PAssPD: Py 12„4 � .&5 _ vote of all OCeecia gotb, Pr ®e sent After, being read by h er and tithe only, tbia day Of June, 1989. Date -M 'ONiid$V*M QUA figs 10_ a! l:4 s "a AY v • 001. 00 We •� OW w... • •try /,�i irriiu.;, • .- NNN////// iNr_!i/ I/ NU/• % / // / / //./ / / / /foeS/ / / /a/// / /,•, mil�i�rrrfi�sfYSr . / �// 411/ AsY. s�!!! 1l ��f/i/i .•siJi /liii! /1/1Oi4'�FlINi iH�ir.I /�,ts///< epn ( CR. 753 • 50' WIDTH 50° .d ! VACATED E /0 78 -232 T t ® '1" as: -r o so "p 140:5b. R• 134.8.0 o ^4S s s �. .j. M . �1SS77 II Al. -� > ••t• teo'i ° a� 6 2iz,T2 i I .18 1t 7` N 100 _ . � �� 100 VACATi� to -15 • 4.2t CHS 100 100 `50 100 4•22 CHL '' 190 61\ " 203:05 -' s Pis 7.50 .I • 100 irit) ,50 ' io. 1.1100lr;ti' f i•,i I W!‘"-em, p,,,,, di. • •4 /1////NN6.fNfV!/l/// //4.'140/1/hX/iY/! /4C.-JISI/�.• -#%1 (CR. -753 ° 5O MDT-hi VACATED RIO 78 -232 Or � 100.04 .n 30 _ 50 - SO 50 .o '11!! N 99631' 21"E ! i� i 8 9 CJ) 7.93 %26' ii9® 204.2 4 6 �. 2S' 1Qti' IQQ e0 • 00 i4o 7.50 Est r. Yap a s9, 412 CHI 8 9 gi 1g i00 100 y3 v .. • fl��r }7t7d TA71Tlf7 B . • 100 , 'BRUCE JMILLER, ,? DIANE, :BAKER 995 `SW LOCUST' ST PORTLANOfi RICHARD BOGi 944,5, SW LOCUST ST PORTTaAND, ; OR .97223'' G.D. MAI' E 2 511 JQUEBEC , EUGENI`, OR 97401 5100 MARRY ,& BEVERLY LOOS! 9365 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD, OR 97223 MARK' & MARY` 'V ANDER 9125 SW LOCUST ` ;'ST TIGARD, OR 97?2 , ISI' 3SAB .400, .10 3, .200 :) WASH CLACKAP; NS COU! SCHOOL DIST. 23 13137 SW PACIFIC I TIGARD, OR 972`23' 202 RICHARD & CONNIE RODGER S 9140 SW LOCUST TIGARD, OR '9 w' 23 CROW—OREGON INC. 10260 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD, OR 97223 BRIAN & KATHY PRANGER 9/20 SW LOCUST TIGARD, OR;97223, MARI7OR : HAGLUND 11075 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD', OR 97223 MARVIN & MARJORIE THEONNES 10025 SW 92ND AVE PORTLAND, OR 97223 DORIS KLEINPELL ' 9220 `SW LOCUST TIGARD. OR 9723, DR» GENE DAVIS 4550 SW LOMBARt) BEAVERWN r OR 97005 5101 HERBERT & ''GEORGIA! SLAUGHTER.' 9365 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD, OR 97223 ANDREW 12290 SW ' F'COF TLAND i 'O 5201, KATHLEEN' & RC(SELL ROEPKE 9245 SW LOCUST ST I at it BARRY HELM 9255 !ArLE LE I PORTL.':NDC+, OR - 9722 '; 'EIGER .W SiD1 I MICHAEL PRESLEY, MAR' 9260 SW LOCUST, St '. PORTLAND, OR 97223. 1004 L,IN !4CATEE CROW SPIEKL'R- HOSFORD #88 7039 SW. NE 10300 SW GREENBURG. RD #200 'TIGARD OR ;9`i2 PORTLAND, OR 97223 1002 .` (' OW- SPIEKE'i - 'HOSFORD BY TRAMMELL COW- CO PO `BOX 5396 PORTLAND, OR 97228 ANN CWELLa #117• 8775 SW LOCUST TIGARD OR 97223 Names of those that 'testa. fa.ed at P.O. 5/2/89 DAVID BLAKE TRAMMELL -CROW CO. 1,0260 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD, OR 97223 MARK VANDER YACHT 9125 SW LOCUST TIGARD, OR 97223 CATHY CHASE 8385 SW STS' TIGARD OR 97223 RON MILLS 10620 SW 95TH TIGARD OR 97223 BRIAN HHALVERSON 10180 SW 93RD TIGARD, OR 97223 .oF M� °ILL= STATE OF O EGON County of . Washington City of Tigard tat . 1'16. r:+ ie City of '`Tigard, Or e gon. That I served ;NOTICE OF 'PUBLIC HEARING :r:+ That I served NOTICE OF DECISION for: City of Tigard Planning I) Tigard Planning Commiss io Tigard Bearings Of f ice c 'Tigard City Counci copy (Publ¢ c Hearing Notice /Notice: of prat sailed , to each 'named , persraas a m; eked exhibit "B" on the `; da NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto` attached, eppropriatet bw,llett►, board on the day of in the United States Hail on the day and deposited in 19 4 , Postage prepaidm Mich is attach( e address shoc�4n , gna ure Pert:1017110 .posted ou Bulletin Boar, (For Decision Cnly) P 'rson, iv`ere to POST A) Subscribed and sworn /afk l.rm to before me on 19 �"fx nd °naanwo° • 4..6 0'40 N,y •Commssion Exp..res 257P''/OOU P o CF PURL C HEARING' NOTICE IS HLREBY GIVEN . IA THE ©0NNISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON . THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING TUESDAY, .__j$y„.� -198, AT�Q PM, TOWN HALL OP THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIOP FILE NOt CPA 89-05/ZC 50n -05 NPO I 8 FILE TITLE: Crow Oregon, Inc APPLICANT: Crow- Oregon, Inc. OWNER: several 10260 SW Greeiburg Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 2' 89 -05 & ZONE C9ANGE ZC 89 -05 CROW REQUESTS C®P�PREHE NPO 8 Are et Nl.�3IV& PLAN it rogues.. � P Plan Amendment OREGON, TN,C. for a Comprehensive Pl Residential to Professional commercial (Professional and a Zone from Low Density to eseional Change from R 4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre) rof Commercial) fear 9 ptrcele totalling approximately 1.84 acres. Also requested is an amendment to the Metzger- Progreso Community Plan to revue the alignment of Lincoln Street. Lf)CATION: 9220, 9260, 9330 Locust;; 10175 92nd, 9225, 9255 Mapleleaf (WCTIL 151 35TAB, tax lots 700, 701,•702, 500, 501, 600, 900, and parts of 2800 and 1002) `see Map On Reverse Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BR CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPT.IR 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DE TELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OR ROE URE :.. , S OF �� AVAILABLE A C CITY HALL, ADOPTED BY THE. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AlcAI y THIS PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN MATTER MAY ATTEND AN BE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED IN � TE IN PERSON OR TO THE RECORD Off'' THE HEARING. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE BY LETTER PRLaLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRY RION FRom THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR `v` ENS IVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT W FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEAS: CONTACT THE PLANNING DR ARTMENT AT 639- 4171, ,. TIGARD CITY HALL, ' 13125 SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT YOUR NE IGHEORHOOb PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO )' ` t 8,,.. CHAIRPERSON: Maw Haaltiund Ibkm /CPA89 -05 . BEN PHONE NUMBER : 639 -4407 sitatorsmii.0 voLLasa aoloamarau .w. "-tartan 27126 l• • • ". 1, • • / • ‘‘ is, • \` I •• SAL STATE OF OREGON ,County of Washington )'; ss. City of Tigard I ` a n r t I , b'e l. ing first duly 'sworn /affirm �h depose and say • Please. Print h ,�. � for That I 'a m a �� The City of Tigard, Oregon. That 'I served NOTICE 'OF PUBLIC LNG for: That :I served NOTICE 'Or' DECISION for: City of Tigard Pi;,anazing Director Tigard Plant/lag 'Commission. Tigard Hear1i.ngs ' Officer Tigard City 'Council A copy (Public Bearing Notice /Notice of Decision),, of which is attached,;; (Narkjed Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named persons at the address shown on',the attached list st merted exhibit B on the. day og �d said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto attached, was; posted on OA appropriate bulletin board on the day of States :�L on the da and deposited in the cif' United Stat y 1911 postage prepaid. Signature � pFor �►ecis om��Onl�t)n Built, Board ti• � { t n. C Person, who delivered to ST OFFICE Subscribed and sworn /affirm to, before me on the 19��r►ktit0fti�i�j� . a' ydy a% Pr7 k'r 1 mob .t+ w t"�ttlitlrlltt01!x. NOT My Commission Expires:c - 9 0 Si NOTICE OF PUBLX H R A R I( NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN `' TBt�T T338 TI�ARD ��'1'! �tER111t,,?L, AT , ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, Y 15, n89 , A! ,. PH, IN' THE TOWN HALL OF THE TTt3ABD CIVIC, CENTER, y 1, r ATION: 131'15 SW HALL BLVD e � � TISARD, OREGON, WILL �ON8IDI�R THE FOLTA��aING APPL �,C FILE NO: CPA 89 -05 /ZC 89 -05 NPO,# 8 FILE TITLE: Hcrow 01'egon, Inc . APPLICANT: Crow- Oragon z T: c . OWNER: sever 1 10200,0w Geenburg' Rd. 'Pigard, OR 97233 REQUEST: COMPREHERaIVE PLAN AMENDMEN' 89 -05 CROW ,.' CPA.. 89 -Or5 a &C�Q� A .r prehen®ive Plan 3endrnent E C�1AN0'E EC NPti # 8 egttget for OREt30Id, , from Lcw Density Residential to Professional Commercial and a Zone Change from (Resid ential, unit ®/ac re ) to C P ( Professi onal al) fo,� 9 parcels totalling approximately 1.84 acres. � Al ®o regieate g � g � y an to Cemansrci z ®r -Pro reps C®wmur:i� Plan rev�i�ne the alignment of Lincoln Stre8t. d is a,�a Amendment t�� the Mel- LOCATION: 9220, 9260, 9330 Locust; 10175 92nd; 9225, 9255 Eaploleaf (wc1111 181 AB, tax lots 7000 701., 702, 500, 501, 600, of 28Jfi 35 900, ens Tarts c and 1002) (See Map un Revstse Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL RE CONDUCTED CCORDAI+ CE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32' OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ABU RTES OF L,PRocEpti.Ole D BY THE COUNCIL AND AVAILABLiE AT CTT! H11LL, OR RULES OF TIGARD CITY t:�tUN�: �. .. � ...... PROCED . p� ADQ�PTR • AY HE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE URS SET' ' EARTH IN CiiAPTBR 18.30 ANY PERSONS HA`'�INO ,[N'1�'$REST IN 7�HI8 MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY M ENTERED INTO THE RE%:ORD. FOR FURTHER INFORHA'ION PLEASE CONTACT TEE CITY RECORDER OR PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 639- 41,71, TIGARE CITY HALL,' 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON 97223. bkm /CPA89 -05. BIN; tkW 1 am. fA ami aw 1 ■� i. �kw= 04 tit 11 : 'N ■ INIM i�■ 'tad MUM alma II!!IIi AO tea.. � r• 1. 0 14, ih :1111111PL I` AMIN II IF 'mud 11111' Av[. air r■ . IP ■ N pm :liiiiu u ■IIIIIR Ml ■ Ilitt a 111111 !M * 1 air LW.. ,I. r1 I I 1 •1 t'- mar. s S. OM rIO fie NMI mill ®M ri ® ®1 -owl - HMO =am ®® 101111 kkiii 90 Ilk °i An I. 41111 ril . ril: mit fillal ,..11.111° LIE Jim =11 _,, ... MN am= R ! !f■ OM 1 4= NMI IMMO 44. ft4i"44 • 1111 Ise aro N i® i•NEEI MOM RIM gin Mit N w 01- ; CM t -_ meettlIOS i r trim IS al. fiNfA[: AY[: Irw MO W y � . mai mi NMI III ma MA!!NM{ • 11 ■ AIM Ale _ M 0 C- 3i_ -. I•I P nip yinif ti, AVE tri • ,14t. 4,0* rdi Animal viltsg7 'ROBERT a' 3'HE► A MARTIN 7119 SW TAILORS PEARY R PORTL tWi, OR 97223 4801 I , BR ttE MILLER, ROBERT MATHES°. DIANE BAILER, 9495 SW LOCUST ST PORTLAND, OR 97223 4900 . I RICHARD BOGUMIL, JAMES BAKER' 9445 SW LOCUST ST PORTLAND, OR 97223 MARILYN HERBST ER,• '7)] 9175, SW IACU;ST ST TIGARD, OR 94223 G1D. MAURER. 25a7 QUEBEC EUGENE, OR 97401 5100 HARRY & BEVERLY LOOS 9365 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD, OR 97223 MARK & MARY WADER YACHT 9125 SW LOCUST SW. IGARD, OR 97223 1ST 35AB , 400, 100, 2800, 2901'' WA6HINGTON CLACmAMAS COUNTY SCHOOL DIST. 2Sx' "13137' `SW PACIFIC HWY T`SGARD, OR 97225 RICHARD & CO1'N`IE RODGERS 9140 SW LOCUST TIGARD. OR 97223 BRIAN) & KATHY ;PRANGER' 9120; SW uiSCUIST' TIGARD,, , OR 97223 MARJORY HAGLUND 11075 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 MARVIN & MARJORIE THEONNES 10025 SW 92ND AVE PORTLAND, OR ' 97223 RIS ,KTuEINPEELL 9220 SW: 'LOCUST TIGARD, OR 9722 DR: GENE DAVIS 4550) SW LOMBARD VEAVERTON, OR 97005 5101 HERBERT & GEORGIA SLAUGHTER' 9365 'SW, LOCUST ST TIGARD, OR 3 9722 ANDREW & HAROLD SNYDER 12290 SW FOOTHILL DR P•OIi`q' 97225 , IG 5201 KATHLEEN & RUSELL RO 9246 SW LOCUST ST ERE lr, 1004 - `t H0SFORD #88 10300 SW GREENBIIRG RD " #200* PORTLAND,, OR 97223,` 1002. CROW - SPYEXHR HOSFORD #117 BY TRAMMELL CROW CO PO 'BOX 5396 PORTLAND, OR 97228 Names of those that testi- fied at P.C. 5/2/89 DAVID BLAKE '1'P„AM1 ELL -CROW CO. .0260 SW GREENBt]RG RD TIGARD► OR 97223 MARK VANDER YACHT 9126 SW LOCUST TIGARI; ► Ca' 97223 JOHN S. BLOMGREN 9960 SW OAK TIGARD, OR 97223 i irK ,�.; .;:.:r.�, r ..,. .:..a, ;. n :1^.,.v.. U- . .-n..i:. u I. �..1a� ,... .. -. . r �a..,...fb.l :. +P1 .=7.� s .! .I r.d:4:. .5 M., 2.. ..+v-. >4, Y ..L �iH�'a ... ... �i ,.�. �.. r ._. �:. .... . .... ....:. ... .- , � �". . �y t .ti�.��., G„tl ��"s, '.;",,: ;,. ... , wq��Mo ;r :tt 5..Tn�.,.h��, .. .. ��:�.,. .,.9�, ..�.,,��. .�,e�. „�:.��., �. ..., ;�,-F . .,s:'; c;, �.J+ `Kt .A . ...,�h�. � , '� �. ..�.a. -.V. .�}r a �.Cr .R, n �, .� •':Y ., , ..�. ... ,e�.,..._�..,... . .. � ,�. .�.�w . �i , .,.<nr ...,,-..-...0 a�,. . 3.i.^r1�1. .. ...,-��.. .}5... � u.dF.:�,� w.....,..r ,,.. .d rn�f'�,��.,. �'.�.z. i{j' .1 ;�d.r � e.., t�.y 4` . .aX.1.'.�...'ti ..�. .,...r. ,e.i.�,�i.,t��.�.; .�,.. .�,n I' ... .�7,� ..;,..��. ��i-. ....ir. C{., ,..s.,,. 1 �i_..i..i . �t�;a.'�I �1� d' a f+ ^;�ly.Nn ..1. ....� � ..,��.7,. .r �.., i�- �.�;,�.._. . �.. . w�. . '��... .. ._r. i.... .. er�. �7. � .,. ..,. ...,,,.. .,Y�1� �-.i,..�;.�r ...,., �.�ti�:.r ��.n....a.. a 9 ....�. �:.-�.,�« .(f 4�.,.a�.�.rd ,f'�i . a i- � .,S�'n��, .{.�e ,�?'�+e.• r I i7Fr i.,.. �.�. .� ..t ..� � ,....,., ....,� ..��,.:�i.,_ . ..�,�„i._. ..�:�i P .,C_ ...,.,.i . �....,5.., � ..�, . �r:s.�v..,rA.. ��-.: .•�-�:w., +�ax1 L.,..!l.�t.� .,y.. �;..� �:' -,.: .._. ,,,t .. ,.� �_��, .. ,.. (.. ..�t. ,., .....� t,.�;, ..a�. _�, ..,.."t� ��{v .�.�.,w\� ��,-.�.,a,�,.. .> .. i q ,. ., . ! ,�.. , .:. � ., p7,.-�....� . .�,a.... i �„t ,� ..�.�., � .� .. �. .��.. ...�1�.T.�, .r...4...,!�...,�.. .e...., k. .";;:;� :r� �.! -�'�i 11. 5 :�1i raV .0 e.�i,.r -.�t ,r., � „ 1. .... .�. .,...�..�. ,,ti ,.. .... .,.a�.....,.. ,., .��, ,. ,l t � 1..,. � :...�.t-, ,,,,:, ...,..�,4 r i.:��.:n , .,tl�� {�.. �St �'+^,�§'i ��,.., 5x, �'� ��5'i ,�.� . �'.' ,.'..�,�4yF. .M..irv�-.. ...i.. _..,;r-i�. �- r.l.i.�r.-'.� . � i�.� _,r...�..'�.'.;y .{,4,� �....P��.-t ,...., .�i:�...�' i ��f.`N',,1 �},,P� �d�._F 1Yr,1�. -( �'•b... f ii '::Y�A 1 .4�,15 ., .�...,, ,..�,.,,s�,r., �f �.,� :c.�. ,i 1 . �.,,� � M i,�. � ..,,.,R,t ..,, -1 t.rt� t�, rr �n f7ti;`}'k �;,. .,•�.i:!�^ ., "'Sr'Jc.�:w t .,... , �� ,:.t .,.. ,...� ..�,.} ,v- 1 r �pA,��.. .4,:.��. �.,,1,. �.�...r� 'S.,�-,!, .� .,i�� :.h..,�.. 4�`�':', 1�._,i�, �� ..�r.� e. �i !,.,+c_. .'d aw,A,�- ..��..:� ,f�.�� i...� �,�.,. .r„ .. � ��.� ,.�,L �.i i,., .�,......, ,. ,,,.,�. ..A,., tt t.�f'.. .., �k.7...,.ll�. ,.�!u� l �. �. .. �Y �. ,.."rft .1. .t .�Nw'�� P. {�;. ,!. ',� M, . ,T... -...�, ,..,�..��.�.wx6 P..... i...l �.i�:-.��..r ..>...r. ;, I}..:, .. ,�..:..�-.i ,.....� .��+�'.ki; ,.,t .:..i� Mrxri�., ..,.0 ,��,�r. �w�. 1 ,.�� `..... ,e!T"�, j.)�. F v� t ,'.:r�L t ,ii�t`i; �la..,i . i i�. _• ,, � „ ,t I hr.,r � .,: 1. .,� t, „_, � 5� �, , ., . , t �•>N' r« ,. a.,t.7 �n ' � .., c.. ..... . ....:... �,1,�� ,;. . ,, „ . , .r....�,.. .7,,,i... i,-.. t. . �..�.�.ti w. , w . ,�� i �. r :��-. b *� .d ��1 L'�.9�1. i a, � ,�r {; .: �i -...� .. K �..�. . ,. .• �� ... .r+.4 ! . h ! �i�. ,�.�.:.:h ... j`..i�:.X.. , ..i �.h � �-:i �.rY.v". -1< --. ,. .:.i�. ,,, �. .,..,,,. i_ ...�..o -��...,, .,1�.,.. ..,.,,.�,�t,..:a.. .,. �....7.�. i r.M.. u.'ti�t..«.�: .,.. .�... ..� i« 15....�. ..,�K. ..�7,.�'. �r ,�,ti,.. ,.i�� _r ."}�. �...C.1, .� ��Yl��i , �.,.�.., ..,...��.� , y. ._, ..,:..... 4,...�,�i, ..,...� t k4 h,...,.:. -. ..�� .w��.i.4..�� . ..,a..a�",�, . .��,., t.-� .'1�.. ��:•Y' �s� t.w. F ,.,lT ,1.�1 _.Jx+•'r;- ,'a'. ,k, .�.!t -� .......� . � , ��,. w ,..��,. ... �,��..,t, ...��,..,t ,. .:�- �. �.....v. �_.!. .4 q.. L,�,r. 7.Y....�a. �{ .t-`�1.°, r�":",.Y �§.: ...�?G b�A .�� `Y ,? *r1.�r� ,...,,.��yi �� •`� ,. ... .�� . .. :�,: .,.,�,,: :.. . ,. ...t T�...,,,. n: .,. 4. �...r.a�..r. �.:�:,: r,.�,:.,., ..4'ti' . .t. .t'Y ,�.v r� �ro5. T .,:.„�.. .�,;�.. .�.�..'...i .. �..,.1 .1..,.,,:.r .�...�.;Y�1.. .�,�.. .,..:�,F...;�'J.,.' , .r.... ,.��..7��.,�"3 :V,. l ...��.,� --�1 �-�� .7 j' ,..t..+.�.a. .1# � ,.� .�...�,. . �r.,. ...,.,. 4. ,+ ,��;i,'f„ ..,. ..4,. ��ru�.,:.�.,�.i�..i,- ,«�,� �.�.'�:. .C�. ..,- .�.,..,,. z... ,.Zi s,uf. FF�;M 4 C��.,i� ` ;...r. �w`. r �w ._. ..� � • i i,.��. ...� ...r, - � .�. .,,::.,��._. � r ,... ..�.,.4.'I. 'k.1�t...�.�.�k... .. ....'.; ��.:�' .yy�:. i,� :�r.;.:yr �.. n� ,��.� r'ti�� .+-.1 -�w „rt :.,. .��_. ..�, � .�. . . ,-, .. -�. .��.��. �:�.„i,,:...�..,rv .x , ..:�.:� ,�.�,i,.�,:-,..,. . �„�,.�l,..c. ,L T, r��.. 1:�..�, ..o,,,.._��:.iS t ..t„ a.,, ,,,.-:.,��... �"�„v J na',:'?�'�. �:��. �.� -��:,i .�•.'!�C l!�. ,f�.,l`�. ,._, 1::.�..�. ,��4.. �,��,. a L.,„,.. , �.. .,.... ,��...�,.... , i!...,�. .;>....r .,;+�'�.,�..,r � �f�,�.�.,.r�;.. ..e.�,..� .�.�; ,i� r �..�' �';� �.�t..'ri.., iC..i'.r`=a,;r ��,. 4:.'i:S';L"° �; .,x�,'�,. ..r , .,,,� ..� ..,... . �..�. , ,�... �....-..��1 ,��.. ,��,. ..,� ..,,,...., � .� � ,�r..1.W� C��yx..s.. �,+.u'� _. r".�t.,s Y��•,--�.� ..r� te��. �b,�i. .�,..t� .�t.5+.. `t,re�. .... ..�, .,,,� ,.�. ,.,,,. wq. - ..b .,,.. , ,..v: .,. .;.:t,� ,,.I...�. c. ,1� v .1„,.._,aj 5 �+,,:!,. .a, �, :;a ,��,,.r.. a�,.sra, a{b. M.�:. �� .��,�� .�T� ...L � S .,..�; , .:� �, „ i ,��r. } ��.,.- .��.. � ,t� c.�,. i '�,��r� r�u'_ „v-�,. �.,w� �W'- ali 1 � .�. e .�.R� �1 �'A , r .....A. � �.i;�-!� 1.�.� .:.� .:. �,r ... .....�,�., �,,;. ...,.�. , ..;�- .....!c -.�,;. . :..,S f ,1 F`� �5� .�5�� '�.1:!' k� �.a�.. b yU. '.:. A ' ,r�', n.r h�.'.,, . r.._'�i.�,n ,+�,',.'. . . ....r,..�.,. � .��, . -,�, . .�:y�.. ..,,.�.. ...�I .. ,..��-rF��V t�,'L,t7,.,t�'. 4' �''i.r t ..C�.yel, .�,�. ,h;�, A1 ,�"� .F i,,$.�� :Fe� ,.,. ..:1 ��,,;,,�,�. ..�...�,,�..- , .,.,., .i i.,:�. .��. �.,� ,:.. �.:�; .. .,:.� .�... � ., �,.,.� ......,,,:i. �.. �,��:� P� ��./::` �«�!, r�'�,l�t:%r r��'� ..s,. 'F u� ",Y;- �. .�,�... ,I.�.i f �. ,., ��..;�,..1. _._:1,4 y,...,u.; �.r. ..1�,�..,.. . � ...,��. _.. ,.,. . . .t� r.U,.,.��k,k. . ,.� :�,.:�.'1 r .�, -<. .J ,i..,,.�(,� 1 o-� ^,��.,. �':..��.�� n.�4�- `:tl 'h5 .�.�..� .».i..,. ...�^,. F.. �.,..� .," ,... ;�. , � � � . � ��:�,. .,�.,1... � :�� .,, �1 I U.-��..:: i. 4 + 'v� ,��.v r.�,.:: -.: . �-. -��.,._.�;.., r. .„ ,.. . ...H.. :l , `:.:-:. .:,. ., .. �;. .+,k.��•,.� .j:�... •rR,„, .c�lu, �..-�i�',.�.,sae 4 L ��u' ,.;r. �.1,�.,��:h ��n '� �tit �+ "�' ...""}y � -�'.", �,�A.. . .,r f��,. .:.'i. �.�»,-,�- �. ;...« ....Y��.�.:, ,��:':. • :... �t ... ,, ��......,.t . ,..,;.�-�r d.��.��'i a-...j�"' �n�.wr G ., i ��,.: .;i �-.Y� ,I'A+=�fi. rn,y it h .�-. ,r.,. � .s.i�< <4.i.i � �.�� .^.-� ....�.�;,. ��....,Y ,..e�, ..�. , �-+.. s ,.-.-.,4 .„.h,.. , :.;:- f„�..1c.,.E..M•�..�.�JIr7 r..l,r_ .t�.� y I ��'A �. �r�,} c ,��r�e�, �„�. K I p^ C. .'��n�.�,�r+:,�'4' �..t�.:.a'Y.,,�x ,t�� ,� .i .�., ..l. ... �.I...:��.1 �:t.'llt. .� ,...... ":.. � I....,. . '�...:.R °'��......t�.� �'.... .,,!1 � �';�1 -..jht t..�,i.. 1 ...a.\1 I ,�:'K i �:;; i� ..;.�',P �.�...�.. 1 i��t:::: �I.�.� , , . �, ..,.,�,.d,,i i.:�..,,, .� ..,.., ,. ;t:�., C`.i::.r3 rc +��yr.., ,0 ,.n'i.�....9r'9.nn, .�i �t�. p, .,� ...lf��. .r.w(}' •,'�,�. ..., . .. . ..,,.� ,,,-�. ,... ..,�� .��.�.,.i�,. ,,� i... ,�u,. ...,.,��a1,N.,� »,��i�.aPfb .i.�',:.. 1 �-.;'�. .�.ri i T:ny�, �.f �r��. g .M,.aa/i f: �,ru •�,i 1�v�-�, .�_�.A.. .,F S�.1.{'w,.Y. .M {.. - �h � !:w., �:IwV,�, � .�L'� G. !"a1 ��w ,�:,!"'. ��y ^�\..4�. . . a::f- � .;b?r,� l n c=: Y, �Y�Y �l � �4,i '�'� � h,,f X �r 3 � . . . .,.i , ,! ` ,,. , ,. ,: :'' ,,e Y'� + {t �'. } . ., , ,., {n: t 'Y y'�.,..�r .Gf�+ii��.; c, w i".s r -4„ ! 1R ,.y fi' a n'�" � i�� .a4?� ✓r� ��;-.l�� ,�. . .A_ ., . , " . . .� .. .i . ...� -..wt. � a ,r_� � 1 ,.�, r.. ,1. ;K'q' f.�`�'�n4 �::� „p�,t, f, ��,aba � '..*.,�'a!��.�:i,`� )� ,i �a�w,r.,��.,,r-7, 4 ;#,F i�� r .��!., , . �:. ,., . L1 ,�;�: .,.,,�.� .y ::;�, , tr,,,• �,�� ,{,.�:,�u �� Y�l ,Y' t., P "ri'��L �'in '� ."A.rA � �{. � i te. tt ,.t i 1�-� ;�. -k�J .1�. rx��r�'�� y.:' .:�. � . i' i, .i� tt4 �f ,.:;� �:tiF. ;c. ",a i �;ip ^st.. ".,d r9�. .�Px.�,�.i�,.,� �'+r' u� »� A;, �v. ,...+� � �,;. �,.I;�. .Z. _ �x�§�c :i�, .i G+� ��q }'� � �.g., 1 �.� �ro� .r+�p r -.��. .� ,l l.n an � ��t�� ,,�"7��: ,..-��' r^.� 7.'A �_.etd�..�. '� 1� _ ;. ' ..r. .,, . _ , . .,,. ^�:� �. ; -.; �, .. �,, ,� ,:. .. . '� � ��., r �. ..� ,. . �..�aa L ��h:. i[, > � y � , .y.•' „ , , ', . ,,i tl9, � '' � • �!" i' t n a r I' ,fn•7 ., a, f "�� a 1 d'� .�. S'. .. ,. . F�, �._. ..4 ��.��.� � .�1 �.n... I��' 17._b�.M 'S. � ��K �Y A i� [� � '. ..,. .,� � 5... ,Y.�� . ,, . ��. � ..�� w.-...i,,, },.�f:., tl��. `SiCI� ! '�: s'�..': ,_.� al.4 �C��..��w ,1.�n �.. {�r:p J �{k ;'�� ., . „ .r::. ., .......e� G ...'.:t •��::4�� y,., . t ,�:��.�. �'..��' .'� � .,„ .,�.� ,�4 �. ,��-. �� ._:a.^ r+ '��hi': �� 4�:r-'(�'.��{.�.1�ZY.��,�P. .�..�� ' .x � f �-�.�a� td..l��, � 6 IT � ..� e .�.nyv . �'��,. �i��.� I.�.. �i � ��1 � 0 � rh .,i �W�i!�il "�1u�1. �ir�i4'' { 4 Ir M L �` �y �: � ..�4 y n.�' � �� Y .,r �^ � �,'� .� � � I J ��'.:�'.4M1�P1 J � .. �� '�.' . . p I,4f. i; i� iy.,. , d � � t ' ,r � ug 4[ 'i n l�pr�� r1s ,r��;.�,.,� ,t." ,�X '�b'",',r��yF °�,�R �' M �.,µN ,/� , -. "� , , . .-. , � , . ,; �. ' . � , � �.�. •�r-+�.��..�/'.��.,r�i�'ctt'.:+.�-ti�+.r.�k..M-:i+anr+��;!iuwr.+�.^��«�l� K"�T v;.K«�,...«,..- ww�. n. µ�..,.5.�.,�,�w� �.�t!'"� �i'�'`.-i--r`..'-u-«J�+�»*«+.ti'; � +�.::'.,dk'��i�f��, �^M'` �;i. ��i., ,µ»'ne�."`*'1 �1"M,'. .°n"ex{",�s`"{., .'1 �•�.r'"""�.i r'.Mi'". .r"�'""�°"�,�{ �K.�1:. a �,X• y r^. .� �'�"`"'k.`�.,��'��{L.o�r,.M'� I;ti�;. .�.Y .: . .. ...a , .. ..V; �M.r y I i � � a „iyi�t..�".. v .:'�7 _Y t'�Sjly��`}�s �pa��j;-;. ,4�i�.r P..t�,, v}haX,':.�.,.. ,� .t,.il: �.�L '�� i - i i J - t a�r -..4i Ty 1.. .;�. ��. Y.xa .x.,.i R��S.F �� 1. ��' r+� i`i4� 7 ni 1 � � 1 t.9 .iJ. t} �1�4(4k'�'" „N'. -'FG .,a i �� `�;��4 ��t .5:� k it u:7. .�.. A ��rw,.!La� 'm;;�h ; - i . ... �.�,. ..� . . , . � �� y� . i�.:. + v-�'� ° :,�i��:,..�Y,, $es y +1 �r .,�r�' i i �a .��.:,'��.. .n,.; a i tH"rr{s i6.::• ..�. p 1�.�ii'w ae Hl... � ,'j:�-.. b.i, 1.. .I,. }' 1' V t"i ,�v 1 1 .{F.'n h I�.��Y'ti 1�'�.,�r�;,� 1 �9't�w�.�, .��.. �.r^. .a 'CI o�t�_t y ,�n.,��r. i � ;!(, ��a.,"�! ti,±,� � h d%.'i l i �Iy' �.IF.Y ..1..9 'N�5��,f :.l�� .dN-��}�'A' /,�•:�..� r��jy K ../( M Ij-: .�� , , �, ��, f. �. .r' .. . ;T x I �'�..,e } tn��.�� .f''}�;,�.?a� a t'"�:; .at� .;�'�` ,h'�.1,1hi;, .,'rs. � �a��i±r':�;r�s k.k- ' �..' , � .. `� . - �: �,.. � ' ' I lvl�.�N�� `�'1�, 4 71=�,'.�S �I�I',y.. � !��"tl Y'nn,:'A � �..�J.t.." � ",�. . � ' i 1 �' ..,J � y h� /� { 1 1 k h {( � 4 ��'F✓ k � � -�, (/��, � "itN f M Y�'` rtn A� ."i. �y�yy�..4 w�rew.rrro� ��wH...�Y�1,m..+'a.»!F»�,=nw, e!W �i;r�rw..«,•c+�,�,.., �..,+«hw�,�'�*r�" '. ,v d'^»�',�.,r..��w�-.-,w�,yr''Wy'"+�+"�^i'-�"�y'x'�:...'+�".`��'"."�h�. i�..±.,!.1�+AW fi. "'wY� :�� r �..i ,_c��'�„"r��',�t+�'�',,..*�N-ijf�^+� „� i� � .,t�� r�' a �, �iAM1.��i., � �l.,r %� S_ � i.+r' 9�«f�� !V G .�,�;�,Si,.��, {x. n., Y ..w. ' ��'. ; '.r�., �.�� "..�.�. 'y �'�'Mi.o i�l.r p �.�.�i. � ..1��. )a'.. ,,54 � I. '� �•4 1 .`,',y I. . "r� ,� t , //, ' � 'k i,',;� ! �Y'!I' � I � I � t ";: i �, r4fi t �� ,�:." r� ��u^t '"' "�+9.p.T�� C1�iir ' I q�;. a`, , n R�": h I, 't� p ��Fq �t}'J q � i ��., ,�, .� . , y . � ,'•� . ; r h ``' k tia. . .'I '�',� �v�if �� "� �,, y �I: ��i�� Y S h+ i��' � $.si��,.�^klM* ;` t e:.� ,�� k�1 5a. + 4t��: 6 J 1:_, �/�� '. �� , { ��, y +�� i� '�' ,?i,.�� i�q � � +�,p�.,.�tl %�.,,�I!. �l� � '��r;� C t,. .w«v.. ..ww -.+�Y.lin.'^"_�.W..w:�w•��°.°�...;1,��„a� waw.� .,��.a�.' ,w• ,«":w+.«,.�.Wn��''wn.+�+n.nw ,'+��..W.I"� ��lw*�!=?;ah"r .N�.M...n+�;d:-�-�.::a-Lw.+ •.+,»iy�:}��Ys�i'±'*�r,-'�"`++""��-.r!,±'?'+�w=�.Vri�""''""a'"ir?»�;y+�a'�'+1±Vti'i! ff� �. ,^^� �M�� .�. .-�� w.p, r'"ah' r "i 't .��""u"! y :r �� t W� � /�+��"� :,.. . �, ��. _. ..,,. ��.� °.;",+ °.�a �� "i u ;i �Zi'�;.� 1.k.l'��^� r�.�n.': .�i�, i� 1 .��.�r '':'ti.�tir �'�^ E"� trHl"�-IJ�r/ � �.� k, I� �� .r o Lv p} ,e. �� a 5 .`,�. � �ii1.�M1 � � t� 4 �2!�F L....��15�1� � ti_.;. '� ..t � *r " yj I ,�� P� =�!Y� �y'"...-1 � 4�' k 1�.��"1 1 5,y�,�� 7f�'t � w � +.� ` � '.! �"+ ��+... �a h �� .t"` q 4:M! �' �,rw;�:. �� :,3 r 'r n `"'.'.,� it r�. f�. i ,�.. xp. ,a.� ��.r+.'M.�w.x�n�Kwt�w.+ae�#�.Y+i+�no�wi.,a..«wrr,«.a�om e�+n-//��..r..sw ��+w�+.�=w.Y«.o++r�».w.�;";,w, ��k.r��'.�....,,.� ..r.-...-.w.-�� .+w�-y'r+!}^t'E'4`i�."^" °"+""_ ,.'� 1. ,�'� �,� J ,I�-! ;:�, ,�� k"" .P 5 k�� ., ;.v�r W 4 „rv .x"�w'7'S`' .i r iw V * . .i �'�� l:ti�. �r:��! U.'`�W ��" � , � � . . , f. � I � ';ei �' _;ri. i�,., t�„ .t h I 1, �s�.-. //�� l � �� d I .' r,:"�4 w i'�� ~ �i{ ��"�� "'� ��"r -�� 1 �,IM � 4�!. t,� � r... ��.V' �/.�. i n � � i,�� `, �'�� y��,J + rt ,;�.� a�1 � -.�t ir r :�� t i��_ (r�•N1 1. �Mr.' .�w+r:Mw w?rnw ,,.:.Y+. w �� ,,.�ww+rw� wu+Yw.+w.+±'vlMN"�':" 1«.^M':�.d+"!'�+r�tti...R+...e�+�-.w'tii��r"mw+�w �..+.�4m.+�"1�'Y""�,,,"��a'+e».;C�+�w��i{�+��w"^�N ,y,,,,,<w, .�t�..: .w�fw:�� '�,e'ti'^� y[� v...T7 ..{, """'L'^�',. ,1. �"""',.. .',�. � «.. ,.. � ' � �N F'a� a� i c .«'� 1 t ��t ^`��'�� '�i l a�1� �i{,�'hsa��, 1.�� ' i r� 1 r 4,�i� 'i � + �`A r �"5} � r��i.yy ., �i t /rf 1 +r P• ' .;' '"' �t r a.._,..V Y i ��J�i 1�1� b�.� `^'f'Fw,r�''i*'1w+wM"�'' / / ,� / '! �! � 1� ��H� � � ',e'�.. � ;�..^�� ;'.v e r"�y u i�IM'�'ti� /.�j�,/ � � - .��r/��.��,. ��", t 1' �.�`b�'��, 6�•'�,�'-,�1 a 'yi;v t�i.1�'�.':. r� 1..� .,��.,�yi. T � �� ,{�'V' .,� �«..�� ,. . .. �. ��. . � . . ��.,+«,--.q «wn ,.,�..«�.kta.r' �W^�wnr� r�+K++>��/a�.:��Gsa'}.wu..�..«4wr�nH.�+�w�r-fk+Jw,J.w;4�'+'�r+Mxe'."+_,+¢w.w-n-�m++'hW�w��yi,twlL�'+"'�""y'��*"'.A�.^r,�+w'�n.'""'„1. 3a.-..+�+ti+��.re.N�+-V» F��H � t.i P � y ; � I � ,�1' �l�' �. �� a � �t ��I' �n t �(. r. �.'� �.�, � m: o � N i x!> � v ,��p�t p L'.� lf � '�� 1�. I � + y ir ,� ^`i ly� �dJ��r F �g; � �.I �u�.:°� �� d '3 i ' .W�„� Jx �.'4 �IU�4' !y' � _'. , . � . .«.•.�^in.ti".'+�k+�wt�^w�+�-e'M«ww�l�+�'�-�++w.aln.�M mw+.u+aW�ww,uw....�!!�i � �.'%1�M'� ,..t�qil�M�M�Y�� w.aw�.l.�w Y��' '4i+u�r,-�;'.n-'+Y_.,-y.e'..U. �.hrWMh�4^LLr'rwl+K+:'±! . y �.i a ��V'1/` r I 1;°� 7. � I' :t i . "`i: i �i, J��h c `�9� � I . c�.,` �.� i A� � x ��CTt p �.+r i� ;�a � 'r � i.,� F 'vlr .t + '. .r � .� � ' � � • . . . .� . ,. . ., , . . � .. ., mY� ,. .` „y�,. ..,w e:i ,.,.�. '. �..«. i � ;.?� :. .«.,�,�..A,' I` �', Y , 4 t `�` R.'t� �"""'y � a'.: ''" � ,..� } . ..aH w �i,.., �Mr �.+��rW.w �a w* +kir+.«.u�-.«�+w,:t�wr.m�».,'Y«w.+,.+,��kh�aw MMr,r+..w..N.«...«....f.ar�.u.•�w,,,.We�:i+,��wr�n.aµ.�e�..w�k,dr+*.+rbr-i4�w-i+..+*�+.f"sw+4'i,w,.n"'.w3+ ,,�++1�++„�+3"'�TM""'�w+?'„9 -t"e".�. "t'�,�.w.w� !.+�n«tY 1+�-ra.+e:o-r�..;-�MrywwH^{ru« ,�.�. �.� + 1,�� 4.� ., 1, N'.� �+�.� I �i' I�:,, I ,� ' R � •�r � •,„'. .� � , Y�� 7� i �� I `i�C`t�,�� .,, 4,h � r»:�.�.rw •�hu�.rw�...�+�. �,.a .H....�,...�r..,�.-'w-,...a«..«,. p..v..w«.Ma„ry»ww+.Hw.,r'y�..,.,,,y',,��IWS+wri.w�l,i�.�iw+r.-w�n»iaw�+,+i.-.,i��a�w.«ri��.x,.a*�w�.ymw.�w.tirm u�w...t�7�s*iwww�r...:^w^«�."' �,'`�"'rr*'M"'^'^^*�'''�d'^.��-+�7�»wlt».p`n*"'Mi4`°^�4. .��., , �� 'll � ��I ,�+. - .:�A,� la 3 -..'� i ' ', '4 �t^i � N i �.; I�: �.��.,�/ �� x � I,I � �' ( k �.n�. w i .:. .�4., w.<.�� '� v. .»i;fl.. /«a.�� 'M4:�, r w,+�« '��FiM.rwW�=•h.��.a,..w.3.�«�a��u.�.,«rF».weztn..h.w�y F�,�y..-n»w�' ��.y.-.F�+.4r+1�.=+aw.�h�.�1+�� 's�,��k`+.��,'a.i+�..«+�.6�+�'t��,•� ;p' ?��. �N .w.',��, 4,- �� ,a� w�°.,.��i�, `rinf.��w .r wsi W* �!w-+.wm +^""ww"M'�^'ryp�y' .�. .. ��awA+1w�.Y"^!a" t 1M'.y,F"(^'"e�h" , 1( !.��. �l. � .d� d ,. � ?� I � �A.' P . I t��. ��.' 'rAI` ,.�M � i J 4'�� i d.l �K,�. 4 1 ,��. j ._,. ,�.w,,;,.. ,��.t�.��..'.aw.»�.w«,...��.yr.�«,. �.:-.ew.� ,.p.�o.«.,w,..o»� w�„n.'�/'��.t..,+Wr•ri* w«�.v+rMi.»a6yw+W�M+w�t+hkiww°�atw:�..�rw+rNMwMw++-��:iww-+.ti+6�» ' r�r+w..w-.;.a �»+a�v««�wi..w-;...,y.t++a.�a,�,y,�.»�.,w°ie+«es,w+q�-. �*"' 1 i; ,� � y �, G 5�t� . .. ��M.. ,f { 1.;.. f'�. . ��p � . . �I ;-+N d t ;�V �� 1y1�� y � t W�1 3 4 °�1 �1 �� .. . . ��'�I I i •,1 �n, �I . � ,�., : � . .. . . . �. .. . ,. .� . .. .I ' :.� I �. �..: mrN.rw�'+.n�.�wwnuru.tNMr.�WrA�i.+�aa�wNr��1N-.i��nQ4MXw4xad��Mi+wb�W"Mh�Nd�B ' . �� I ,': y,� tl '+ ` .• •1µ�• ..'1 _ ��» na...,. ..��..�.,.a.t ,xpx�.w. W.��I, �'^�wc..,�..�.,w�c �.a«�;wt�u+e.yae«..�,w.Mw�+�r+�+»,�.w'�,.r-trF'^�*:::,,�.ws-,Y:+�r,p+«'k,-�Mw.ir•Nw+w.�r�..�:�u'-1µ�....mn.surw»is ~ I 4 1 i "l r ', � L � �I �� r �� '. ,��fi � �t �� ,�� , � ,; 9 �� ,.w�n-�.�-ie.,�• ��4,., .._.*rn..�,:. �� - �y�s«r.r��.. �Ma�u.n w+e�,�w4.w.«�..;,a....Ua.....w� ,w .,w..wu�wwn.�w uw,�� .mx++nVy'n+�1.�,.,�+�r.+.+^�.-�-'F�'a'-w�,w..nm�`..r�+..+�W«�-id�tl+.w,ti.4.�ixnu�*i4r�+� r� .+r N+wn w � r . `t'a'M�t„"t�!'. 1�.�.Nb'r" i�I4 ' . ,/j .. �1�;.� �4 4�A�M I C�, �,,�� I <<'M , .:» .., .w:, �. , .w ..0.r.� +�.. . K, r�+n , . r . . � . , . : . ,� � �/ l �'� 4 r� L �.. �,.yju3 V'�' 4�� :��P P � /��//// I� I � .��, p�! WS � Isx � �'" � '1t•'.�_� ',� 1 , .. JIO��i.,. . r� �,{. ..K., .,.��.id,A.w,+wY,.. r�-r..,w.wuw,.e. r.re�W.« «t„�»-rr,.r.er,..wA'H.F+UI-«'�w'.t+�M:w4.!rw �i,F.w»..w�?�.�h.w�++�wwa...w�,�u.l':�'at+N+�«�-+..:.1-rh� a'�::rr±u»-,��a..�=:...�.�n�wi:'�^'«r4��a�i+�� i .r , , .,r+r �O��I��=1.�� . . w.,,,«a_. . .,. .,..w,,. .�+ww W .w tW ww � .� _ .� !" ,K'1"'.�"` .:. � � r ; � . � ^�4 �. .i �:� �iy � pl } � a i �x ��q ' �✓ /�y �. J �.... , .,...,.. ..�.�a(/- ,u..-ve..,�!�r" .M.,s»u �' �n��/,'�i'�r/��,74'�p8�i,wW�,., ..,.�.w � .,.�r��w,,. � ei.+.wm 1� Mr<+a+...m�� +' ',�,w.l.y�wnq� �� '�'.�.a.w�',.ww`+-�'+�f�-�•+rw'iw�M,h,+.�lH*fwh�tF�!W..w�::. i �„ �.w+d .rr ��r��a',.+« r+++��w��e�•ww..,W.,...+� ,.+�^ �+Fy+is t aww.�.+,..+.fw-�..ML+.r.t M�� R . . . . �"�.' t� I I . . (/��,/�.� �� I ' �k t I � '� y�,G nb�� •�'�, µ� � � .,� . .. ,{��.� � .�. �� .�. ��. � � �� a . �.. I 1 f„K ; .. . . . . . . ... . . '{ N.n"w`""**wnH"�+4 'a.'a^'r+^!+4} '?"�i.r.e�-W�1`�"�*+ "4"""w'�`.�"WJ„V+p'��,w+�w�+w'�µw! . . ''�> .��, ��.". .w.a..... .�� .,,.ir «.��w.w�� « ,.�-,��w-a � . .� '"a"''v',u��+.+...r!w�i•=� � ...,� U�.. ,r,./ ,.�. .�d .0 ..«w.w�, . � n v �I � � ' , I ��, 1 �� ',/�� .�� , �; ��"f� a i° '�' '1 .�. ..+rnwer�.d,� ,�iL M,xi mr.., .i,.,.uM..a .� ..*va,�w . .�� +.��e� ,«+.a;i«..,M°w'S.+.�f�w+a�a.�.c.�W�..�.�!.�!•rp+»�wW,a,i�l;w�....u,i.m.w•�a+w-h.aw�ai}k��x trr��.r..�u.��w.e� ,p�'.. . { . � .. v�-� , a 1 � ��y.i+•tx.+FWaw.w'.-idUwaw�+i.aik�+i uN+«wnw�ir� .. i I I Y 'iw i. .\ �k al"�� . ' _'/�A ,� � �+ i 14 „�M �'� r ' 1 � �.� i y r„ �,:� /��' �/� / ,/� f�Q� •� � N f � L a�^� � � ., . , . .. (�1c �.1 C i' r �' a a i+4i �ia n , I . ��Of."' ...,..,. � � \�r'fr!!'..e.y..,w!�..�.v.�.w+,�n«�...�«t«„�..�k,r«ir�.+..«�.r��y„e�..ryt �, . '. ..:u�.w�»wW�i...r�.�.rw ,.. .�uM �`�Y'S ,•� ,.n„u� r .,aw�wM,+ww.�x l...y...,. m.u'.atM+uyW�.W ..�+ i-�,`4M . '��y/� +. 4� ,-.�1 . �•.. r .� 4 u +� I �. .(� �'�� Yi Y `• r A , x. I v I{I� i 9�i p��. Y _ r w. �� n��I y 1 ^� i �.`�. . �JJJ I J � ��I 'd t I .I I 4 1�� L t` . Y'r.Y. � 1 . /// .�. . r �, ' � , �1� . '. ,,..e. ..�i: �.��A/?' � �� ' �� , ' � .� � u:�. � � �,�. �'W .� Wf � , �r � + �.. .. „�,r � �. ��a ..�.r�.r�:,�� .«wwa.,«+w, n.,�.�«v+.w..am�.l«.,r., �»�v..nMV�..r,w,«�,Nri�i�aw.«:w%+wuw.�+��:r�+�rwmqt�4�:*t,rk�Y°^�wa�u,Wri� ��.kw.esxWw«+fJ+Lw'�Fai.�:�'i"74�IXw^:W-.^44*"'h9�(�,�.aMe�+�waa.kWw�y�'�r'.+-J,+�rr�Wyviwti.+.��++d�i^�L.,L: a� � � ,� ,��;;, - n �" � :��.x� ��., �� r '�; ��, . . . i � I ',:n 1 r '�.v i �F{ J�,�� MY« . � . .. '.. K �Y"��5 iµ�,�.V ` Y ` r 1. �d r.�: u '� ,;�� i. i ,a ik { � I��u .�r � - �. �+,w�n .t � I � �, . � ' � ' `Y .a � .ar , � �C * 1 . _ : Y ...� .�� .r� � �.taw.m ,wwM.vy. .w.+,wa, waa.�Yw�.uw+-r-*.+u�»nn.�u t+twh.`W^°"a�p�Ma+-e+..f-.W�w+n.�Yi«+rtr.Y. i+rrJ+"!!!±µr Nt'w+.,�4..au4ro»Hn�^l�'t-p+d�.1�N�aw+u•ipK+«i � R_ 4/ i �':: �k� n ,.��k�. I '��,. a �� ;�.�� / fl �v/' � �y r r � r" �i "� ,�,� L' F } 4::,' �'A / !1 /��/ J� ��j� � ,�/�n 4,r p 1�, \ i, � .� t 'Ir�'? ':. I ', / �. .{+1�� ...�.u...�.uum4w.+. ,aw..l. t��,..�+�.sM�+!�•.m�uww,.'w�»law,w t.�y'�' . -O / ��, ,�.. .,...... �+J��_.w...:.:_-,.., �ro. ..�.�. ;r'�/!�..`wi .,.��.w+ �Tw.e... ��'��^`^ �9�w^.wln�n,YwW%W'�.�IWNM•�wi+l�f+4�.+�y�}I�el��w+�.N+Ya+.�i,wwn.rW��r..sl+�?,`I� /j . ( � . � �� , � � � * ��1 � , � � . ... .�� I /� I . �f i fi '� � � � t � 1 F��;�'�}��'t �1�`Y,,r ,�`+6.''�°'�p�y°�r'�@'�*+i� �. �� . �� [,/,�) � t� E�/�,,.� �� r a � :r 1 � ��,�: d q p.;��#y C�.MC. �.��. ,�r:a��.;n..-��a .� ...��J�!�4r��. _ �.,,�„., .�.:'w1��,�.-«��..�{:dr-Na nwuww�w�..«.w,�«,wz+be�r%-•vhaa,w�n�r+.il,�WMJ+,w,wu;+snww.��r...yy+ar-+u+Ls.«yr.�il�tw°.,"��r.!�4i1�..��`"".��.1'r'�1.4,".qiy�}'�W1fi* � �� . � � !� ti i" ��-A ! f ��wr �''Kw %.t°. i iI !�� A� .il ; . �r _F :; ki r,.f i, �«�, i �' f!y I � � .�'. ��y� I�� "�"� p�� Y�� 4;�� ;,� �,ak l 1F 4��t.��.�y�< <.5 a�''.�: � . �.J.��.II M �,-N W.M1Ya+e M4 �»M!M-�Mb•�-+NW�R��wwnirnw..AV'W�•i'�i��M�`!u!W wre.ro+w.v�n�wjk MkWM'�a� M��M+M�� *MT�'�'Hh'fM'�° R^"Yn!� � . . . , 'N r ir u�Ai� I .. rrwrX�M�' rxylp��M�.w�?K�4�MwW+1 ' '1 f` ..( �r�'J I.;I��r�'MWY�Y�+.�T'�i `t�- a� ,i: , a It I� i .�,� rx i ��1 �� !.� `1�'1� � . . Y _ '�1'� 1 �F I � 1fr� � � ! I 'ai''��. � i� � � � 1 1+ �14, rit! iwi� +��!ri� ,. . . . F" �Nr i � r��j7� ��u� �i �' :'� � ,. � . . . .�,�Y�.. / {� X k P`L � } . ' . . . . . . . . ...��.� . ... �..��..xu i:w�.4.� r.w. ��+af�l. .pk.. I��..Aew . wW+•4wWaH+w�Maan�� 1��M Waw." I4d+�+1eWW.' . .W�wIW.. IW. ....s. '�.'°'yp�'�+.+�+�n'" B�7f4 x'17 ,,�� ,.+.. .w .ntwm wn , y a. �a.� rwx «+r.ww �.u�+r�«w�q�� an+wa �aaw�+m4r�+� w+ivA�++-K�ro�+:r14 �WA°'I"'��•4 �"^'"� ��..�M it i l�r � � i e,Pi� � �i �;. �ii� ,. � k' " � �4uM�' �?4`x"1�� ..:i r��ry 1ou�Ri �1�1', � ' ��1,t,�' r �4�' � '�x�y;�'r�a 4� �� ,J �'��'y� ��, � . �'I- a �� t, i �� 'h� wa �,i �i�", �� +� �1i �,�u F�`+ ,�. � W � .. ., , �a-�:ri,w±a., ,w,.�., w,a��d,�wt,s,wro ,H�,o....w,..env�,.;r,.�.aata4r�m.n,..s�w�wa6.w«�4a+t-w+r.��;vri«w.µi J..+a,m+.��e6+.C�++«�W`'r.rt.+�.,1.u..ay:.w»�'S»v-+wv�w�«�+-1:+Nh««�,w� x�!+6�,,IG'�w�w'k4�wr��f+�y�+rwA�th+. .. ...�. � . � .. .�� R...n.w�:�.. . s.wr� w v, .�v.,.+w. ,,r....,. ....� .. ,. ,�.,� . M+.� w i . � . I . I t ,�.. `�yA�'�,� '��1 : � r -�1� .- w va . , ` �i y" � q I t�., i; � 7'"t :�� p( k!�4 4 C� �y I k6., .�..,� .... .. ' I � ' �,� . '. �, �� ' y4 i"; � � ,�4 '{9 �' � N.:; a '�I d � ' �. y�:.f� ,.v �_ r '� J .��.�a�r�f� � N.,.,�,�� trRf� �p�A.�._iy: � ... - ,��' � �. � ,�..� � ��-, '� ..a,�d 'w�, i roa �� ,r',,�� °`wSY � � �� ' .M�-,��,�'��_,t�'�: ,_, + �-. .w�.w,,,��., „r,+,. ::� ,.. .,� . .w.r „wa. ,�e r..�,i"..�Mntnw�n+wrwr�Y+ka�,rvr�ww�:«.na»�cw»*w•r�P4rar.»<+.w�r-«waa+.s..p+»+ww«w�l�•w��4-ir!.w:wau�s+,..�w«r.aa�w.�»rwt��,n..�+i»w�yw&+'�y'",±'��5« " R�"��""'*;�j' ,ti��, r r P� i�f B -. u,'i""�I , � � Y� � t �:. L � m �° .,�' t � i ,n} _ �u1 r�.0 ��k+�b-�y i w ) 1 h'�r . ' rs r � u 4F. w � f � , c �w eyr �I p�t� �M � � i �..I, �� '�i -, i . i, . �-.�'i�i� q d ��firci>�.r Mti�Y �.,�,; , �� i'a `�- �'�. - i. '. :�.� �" ,. "i'. 7 i', ' �� a�r.�+ ��'�7 °�r� ��' � ''° a.W�a�eiw,i.d.�.w,i.�p: �we,�-.r+w.::� .�.w+�h.+n+. mk.� .+,�n,�a�,+�s&..xx.1.+Frs��.w aN.a.y�a.�«+u�.�a�aJ.�.wr.+drt+�F........�.�h„�,A�+�s.+mirw!Mft`.."y:�w»mr,.rrw�.+m+..«4J+w+.x+. 4�.��+.4wuNyL�.k"+?`;tt �+K++��4d�+'�i M1��' . � , ��.��w.i�+ r�,.+>,.« -w,. .m� +c «, .: :�I, I t � C + l ° i I� s'�pp � � � ,� u"i � �I � k i � 1nA ��t 1 t s M�j ��;�� . i '��• �'� � . t �� ^Fi v� 'i9w {� ��.,�K� �tFa ��"ri� 1 . �s�ai ,1` I i rt ";1 � �n �i ; � � '�; � f!nt f +. iM i . (;�h � M�� A �w,�' I } ''�.s„�� i �� .i?��1 4 :t�n�'��:� y u.�, , .. � ..�,..; -w dc.a.< r1�M�;�.�+, � , � � �. .� � �' ^. uN _ ` ,� , , j I , , r� y •' � a r i;, }y� ��, �".sy . ...r��,� e.w.i-�a u�.r.n.��+r�>+».��.rr ��1.ew��qn...:.�..�Nn h w�r-.,a:.aH . �.�,.< ,.�u,uw.�,,.,r.�.4.,.�.+:Mw. � ., �i�+ r' y,rr. �df www�+f�.''vi+� �:,�++nw "t ;1 '�� AIF: ��/�� nurw.»w w.w.r�;e � ��.a, u N+»leR.!MMa+-��+�ob�w�m�`�+WA�� i 1, . .. f �r r:,�� '�.Y��r' ,f' �,'�� t i ��: 4 i.. y a ;��i a a!�, ;, � "' � '��I i, q,em C"�Y'"�.„a�',..i.KK �;� - � i � i�p:' a an '�� i:'.a � S,�i � �� a ,. ��ia�l r, u�,�lr9a i �,�'�N �� u hu F<.� � � � a y1 r. .ti :�rt 1"{�s y�1,, a r �u;r �i .�.. �:'�+ �i �' � � � r �i�i �-0i-i� k- �' '�"a�ll '�� ru� �t� �� , , . i ��i �. �n „ � ..nNu �. ,w...i.�., ,�.,..a�.wA;�w+oa..�,.,i�l.utw.r �M w�l .a�'>. �.d ��»+.w; n, d++.«,µ-�Y.iw�.anw�i;wR� i�c . .:-!�Mr41' -�!G: 1 i ,..� �,n .,,�e_,..Hh.�.��.uu,�u�n�rnw�r;�- .�r ^MW(�.nv_ r. W�?. �, "+u�w'awy!w�«. �ar ��tw`nwi�,wl 'Y �.�.a� �'�'W�"*"atR ,,, �+ , "" ��," �u ,N �„ , , ��w , � ,�i��a�'�C.t�" �ry �r�' .,a,�,1 "'�a, �.��. It v 4. ..1 .,�.�.Ib� 1 ��y zk..�. b.i�1�n.Mi�'�.i 1 ,, �� .�.:,:i�_� , ..� . .rv r»..:�,.1 ,e�ix:, �� r ��:,: r . .,r��.�� .n,.-' � ` [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] 100 2400 2401 .lAc. .,Z 'OAc. FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE 0 2801 2800 .18AC:I .269C. 90,. 0'Ee TERN. 1910' O.R. 1530 53�rO 5304 6A4c /6llc.,• all 44.0 ETzs R rN yi 0y0I; Sitrtgart 20 Asstsst401 4uR Q 00 OT 013 a ItIG)Fw.► (7:`�ye�nrw..Y.�,i..i' #:�A,.4 +i�4 `,E2�'iM1, +._ j "{1. CAA w DATE: s. _ MV-01 Vi. L mom: Tigard P1 n ing °Department R8: CPA .89 -05 /LC 89 -05 CR0W ORHCON," 'INC., Is requo't' fox'' a Cooeprshensive Plan Amendment fr am Low Density Residential to p•Mriiisiontit.:Veiistercial . and, a Zone ,Change from R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 unite /acre) tcp, C. P (Professional' Commercial) for 19 parcels totalling approkimately, , 1:84 acre®;. ' Alba t the ' Met an amendment � °� o agar-- �►rogrese C�anranity. Plan 'to revise, "'requested is ' the alignment of Lincoln Street. LOCATION: 9220, 9260,' 9330 Locust; 10175 92nd; ;.92115, 9255 Ma aleleaf (WCTM 181 35AB,1 tax lots 700, 701, j 702, 500, 501,' 600, 900, and parts of 2800 and 1002) Attached is the Site PlaA and applicant'a statement for your review. From information supplied ° by variative departments , and agencies and from '' pp y other= information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be 'rendered on the proposal in the neer future. If you wish to comment on this application, . we need your ' Ooeasote by IN2E14,A, 1989. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to re turn your comments. If you ,era .uralarl nond ee* bv. the above date, please phone the nrtaff ` contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writf. =rig as soon as possible. If you have any questions ,regarding this u att,, r contact the Tigard ,Planning Department, artment PO Box 23397, 13125 SW , Ti and Pla p , Hall Blvd., Tigard,, OR 97223. PHOY = 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jcrry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING' ITEMS THAT.APPLYa We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Pieaee 'refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person doismenting: Phone Number: blue /CPA89 -05 . BRM /moo ,Tie it;41" NP9' NO4 • , CITY DEPARTMENTS NoITIFICf‘TION 'LIST FOR ALL APPMLCATI, (7CP0 " . Bttiliding Inapector/Brad R. Parks , & itee , reinti'lla Bosird/C rtis S. 9ty Re.cor4er a , .-_.._ --; iollee TEllierint/OrY A. ---)tier. . I . SPECIAL DISTRICTS Fire. District - School Dist. No. 48, cBeaverton) (piek-up, box bldg.) Joy, Pahl PO fax 200 Tigari, .4.D. ,---- Beaverton, OR 97075 ------ 8841 $w contierciai , . , ,,-----Scht)o_i_13)71.,1.1:11. Nilaoc.i.:13eJ,Iii(ilyTilleard,),„.,. Tigard, 0R. '97223 • . 1311,, Titlard, OR 97223 Metzger W.D. - 1 other • AFFECTED JUL;SDICTIOIfS Wash. Co. Land Use & Minato. 150 N. First Ave. filZ,lsboro,...0E 97124 eartis in ,,Martin A ptirititer.64t rir ,J6 1114,48,. City of Beaverton X Jim Heltdryx PO Boz 4755,- 4755 SW Qlriffith Beaverton, OR 97076 777- 320 'Stark .itoom, 530, 111.115boro, 97124 , 2000.'SW' .1st , Ave. i?Ortiand, OR "97201t5398,,,,H,,. State Highway Dion Lee 'Gunderson PO lox 565 Beaverton, OR 97075 . SPECIAL AGENCIES • General Telephone Ed Wilmott 12460 SW Hain Tigard, OR 97223 . . ....... . . N`iitthitent • ••• • • •••, • •••• .• • • • • •,• • • . • . • • •••.• ••• ............ „.. . . (0257P/0()21P) 04 • Other Portland General Electric Jim Jaahnsort Portland General Electrl.e 14655 SW 014 Schoi.la Ferry BeaVerton, OR 97007 ........ . 1815 MW 169th a GfµlRD, O �4 r 7 fir«✓ '3 Pa P'0 IEJ1,J'NT 'PA .t `1.J PO w i; : PIEN' ISO USE AF'F '1„ I CAT/ON 441.t, , 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23597 Tigard, Oregon 9722 BRIAN & ANITA HALVERSON 10180 SW MAPLE LEAF Pf1R''T.7A? T f1Ri, Q7793. BRIAN & ANITA BALVERSON 10180 SW MAPLE LEAF PORTLAND, OR 97223 11111111l11101t1111tl h1111itill • I J .I. Publ .c ` Hearing: Crow Oregon Staff Reeommendati,on , by 'Community Development I Staff ,'reviewed, carefully, 'ane recommendation was 'contrary ..to -What the School tD i s tri c t and some of the " neighbors . feel i n that recommend Inc! for approval ; on a 'rector:. portion of the request `s`'hat portion .is .. that area alr•eJy. covered.' by a parking lot to correct .a situation wherein the use Was legal while in the County be,.tt not " legal now within the City. Recommending from th at portion which is now parking lot should be changed in; zoning from residential to commercial' s ,..4.'� was not whether or not there will be a six—story parking 'structure or ha;t. •— buried 'parking structure. Not talking about heights of parking structure but only thta land use .itself. The question: should. the Comprehensive nsive Plan be changed; should ,the zoning be changed; should the traffic plan be ! changed . Have 'condition?, changed or were there some other circumstances different than when these Plans were put together. Staff reviewed whether the criteria had been met as 'outlined to help Guide Council, 'determine whether the requests should be granted. Staff found most of criteria were met, including the fact this was 'a good location and determining whether this was an encroachment into a residential zone. Ordinarily, this would be considered encroaching, but the school acts as a buffer. Noted another criteria, does the council feel this would change would be warranted becautre the result would be better than the city would achieve under the existing ComPr^ehensive Plan designations. Staff also ques ned nether• there r yas a need for more commercial zonins in - T g fat into a larger plan which has been discussed th � area . � ire �:han e s would ,started • j•et (doing a `' more comprehensive l nd use /traffic analysis for the "►�. iamand` area, including the Wash ,rigtari 'Square .� Wandering i establishing precedent i chin in zone ---- would at -� that other logs 9 g o et from th�.s n Locust or down ttonsrabout t;he snr: �� alo als across the sure Staff has lot goes ee Qn +scup • Fot^ • angel to commercial, be cM the record, do ].ik� the project< an a in the et what Chas baefT pop s d o (although pwobably l not necessaral E rr�or�: will, auhen zone is changed,' you get ,;�hate� z ira, a •-- s er ..one aldeed` "IrestnaClkaonroW th offered to make the results mor�r certain by placing p . Council could condition the land i.o saV �t would only be �7sed for ark�.ng zone chan a as + t'he Planning Commission was recommendingwso h�'w zone change g ou lii ' re - n would be co no tt�oned► upon receipt of a deed restrsct:aoro stric it to parking only This' is not usual practice; howe er. Legal counsel : ..advised ear+lier� that it was legal to condition a zon change • so this would be an option Council could consider'. Staff 'thanks that ►'ramine'l • Crow - . in a future` �.T� ar whatever: :o a�:tually construe • 93rd wl"�i ci'a involves the acqusit:tion of at least one 'house in tht area this would_ he p. They also agreed tro par�tici.pate iri • the larger tr°a efic, • , , • and .land • • use analysis that needs to take place _ this will help. '►`;sere. also be •• s h u�i l l" be made n and a d the s a to at. the �ertaan traft+ac amprovem�nts whza room time , ,f development. Staffs main concern zs that there s a lit, of congestion b iro an area already . . ` ai = ►� N v and adding ;anoth+�r �., 60d; meta vehici,s •ins it �;;reenburg an h ~�t d ... area a t�hacih mc�... � a foaled" the , d� y t arr h loco �t ser ace uesn� t serv�:ce are rrrore sometirlres during t .e +day.: �'h� question as wheth�lr Council should ' ,contirnee to change the zones s,r allow development area. Staff decided <'a "red caution flag" should be noted. that maybe trafficilend use seedy and not deny this, but put it on hold unti that stu is completed so we know where we are going in the fu, turig Mayor: Question --- .Where are the ;1,600 ad,ditiolnal" cars coeing' from Ld : 1,600 cars is out of the applicant ` s traffic engineer's repor"' the conclusions was that the site would generate appr%,►ximately ,,ehicle trips per day when, complete. one ,'� 1,622 neke Mayor: It's already zoned and it's already going to a be that'eey regardless 'what �,. for that ;use how you get additional traffic' irnpaets. when it is already 'zoned Trammel -Trammel—Crow can go out tomorrow m ruing; and test a 350—car parking garage on that spot regardless of what a do tonight, un1F.,as I've missed something here..,, we do here tonight -- that picture doesn't change.' 'gym confused as of Ed Ag +i.n the question is not what type oaf parking structure .s going to built and �frankt.y, I` doubt there will be a parking strueture built, in this area. Theoretically, it could be built. . Public Hearing was closed. Consideration by Council: opportunity to hear this evening two rather Councilor Ifasten We have the opp � it y i r diverse points of view: One ' is from a number of property owners in and about the Trammel --Crow area, living between Locust and Oak who were strongly, in favor f the three items which Council is considering this evening. They have . brought to oar attention s has been attractively developed, tax base consideratduns the presence of the the 0 such subjects as a ''natural extonsiOn of an area that buffer and the visual appeal to them of the existing area. On th school as a b other side, we have heard concerns about traffic, about the l ayout of the proposed interconnect on .93rd between Oak aed Locust and whether an eXtre 200 f ion Mey either. ' ase ist or inhibit, g � y or 400 feet is significant r is��ant and how that extef�s the further future de�selopment a� commercial property between Oak Str^e,A anU 217, In my opinion the question of congestion' Versus ded1e1opment is seinewhat to k came first? I err net persuaded similar co the chicken or the egg -- which ,. that by inhibiting development we will hence solve the traffic eproblem: I will, therefore Vote in favor of the three items. Councilor Schwartz! I think I have to ` agree with Coueoiler Kasten. On the recommend ataon from the Plannr in g ammxssxan ic inc� ` ed cor d tion the deed r estriction �was that to restrict that portion 0n 14 parkiO4 structu^e can be in there Mayor: yes, that `s my understanding.` ._.� a else made a comment that 'the 3 thatt ■would Schwartz Because s�!m�,�bady , stay a parking lot. If you lirfe around any aeada 1,gdhooi, ford^ s6hoo1 functions, there is a limited ,amount of parking in the e4ening' lith the agreement that T ^ammel Ceow has for school f=unct .l for`! the 'Schoo'l District to use that parking for overflaW for school. functiohs 'i, thinks it's a real , plus a, it advantageus to the neighborhood, So, I think with the deed restriction, which would eliminate that parcel of land fors the zone Change to pecome sarse v 'kind of 5—story par^lcing garetge, T ,would have to agree iii r' i't an ,Il cast 'my vote for the approval per the Planning, Commiss:.on's . recommendata,ons. Councilor Johnson: The testimony t;rr opposition tonight 'heard zero'itig in on the curb of the extension of f.P3rd street :y-1 .don't recall,,, that a heare opposition to the development or the rezoning of those pr1,iperties, , clearly feel ' they'r supporting the room for .'the. rezoning and ' support that." The Planning ,Commission minutes say that. Commissioner,. Fyre and t3arber'; recommended apps; eal.i to City Council further recommending` that City , Councl1 impose a deed restriction limiting the development on the property to ,a tyro -story parking structure, top story at grade level. And, staff saying that legal. counsel told us that we do have the ability to do that - sr I .would also support that dead restriction. Lastly, on the alignment of 93rd, I'm not persuaded that dep.recr.atrs the value of the property south of Oak st, It tope; rs if get the connection b ei 1t,' gives those properties a way to connect with "Locust and gives a way to get back to Greenberg ;r as oppoeed to that street vzot ever being constructed and the only other r1‘:er roative i oing to 90th and Hall. I agree the transpo:^tation study needs to be begun and Council has advised staff we need to pi -oceed with that. ' But, :I don' see this as a permanerrt disuasion of development of the property south of Oak Street. 1 also support the realignment of the street. Councilor Eadon: To clear up some misconceptie,ns heard -- one was in regards to public notices. First of all, there has only actually been one public hearing. We are required to notice public hearings. There has been one and that was the Planning Commission meeting., of .Flay 2 and that was noticed as we are regvv ,red` legally: to do. Property owners within 250 feet of the prorirty are maid maiLed noti ces to their homes, it is a public noti ce in the n ewspe.- ,ere, it is also posted here in City Hall. T also know this entire issue has had a lot of media coverage in all of the local papers of late. So, T don't i want anyone leaving here thinking something sneaky went on. There were not ices sent appropriately for the public hearing' that was held. The other things I heard here, the Metzger parents' meeting, the PFA ` feeetieg, and other Metzger p meetings — public hear ice.,, that the City is parents' meetin s those aren't P.rs responsibile for those were public meetings and happen to know, again, just from reading the newspaper, I heard mentioe� of at le�.st the majority of only would The on]. one I did see mentioned uld h raae be en the April 12 LID meeting The rest of theca have - been covert +d. Y' don't think this has been ?a secret issue 'w-- it'e been on the front burner and I'm sorry people feel they may have been left out of the loop. Cut the information was out there. I heard the opponents saying tonight that they thougtrt that, in their opinion, ; sou °tl1 tf the development of the road as proposed al as going to hamper developer Oak. I don't think that that case has been Dade sufficiently to warrant that weighing g wee ban g into m , 1 - decisiar► tonight. T don't believe we can curtail development in one area in order to force it somewhere else: I think what I see is actually the y when you enhance that area of the community nthere is doing to�hema spinoff effect and I believe a4 some point the property south of Oak is going to feel that spinoff effect. I agree also hnson that the transportation study i something this Council has b yen aware of and has been asking staff where we are in that Any than', i s taken process and is s�omr:.thang that we still need to do. �,n.. action here tonight ; shouldn't in anyway signA1' that We are not going to look any further at transportation issues, but I don't think that's the case: Z think the conditions have changed since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted. 1 think the criteria for a Comp Plan change has been met and ;I 'think results !would s • ee 1, X11 ..' t 'the overall y, Therefor, wx: Wbe ' lenefecial to this area as we as a, the condition of deed restriction, . that's been mentioned, I'n also vote in favor of all threrc items as the Planning Commission 'Mayor. q b memers' of this Council, that; Mayer: � To �� pick .+up several comments 'mace by . � '� that the issues that are, being brought, before Ilse relative to "And 'use, transportation and' commercial development ' as well; as .all ',:rather types of es in this community and in the area around u; I ,develc�oprnent are not easy ones came � out to took with a great dead, of interest tonight, ` ` those folk's who testify in opposit ices and I wanted to hear specifically what the had, to say ibecwese I've heard' e.that they've had to . say many times before. and I certainly agree with 'them in almost all of their comments. The Planning Commission,' in -�� aendation . I � read the this case,, •, voted unanimously to fore+ area this . recommendation. transcripts and I `,read what transpired with regard to how they got' to that position.' One ' of the most interesting comments was made that, Trammel (.grow, the finest. developers in the country recognizes who is `'probably, one of of �;.. � But, I certainly that there; is a substantial traf t''ic problem in the ,area. agree with them that by not , ;llcwing improvements, you stick ' your head in the and and' you actually do not solve the transportation problem `I happen to have a great deal of information with regards to 'traffic problems' around here. I have worked for a long period of time for one of . the major traffic problems that was mentioned several times, but I also find it tort interesting that same of the opposition wants to use the maps and materials put that they put together with the County in the County's plan which allowed those developments which in my estimation were .c done as well as they could , have been done at the time and now that it' ,A in the City, wa gave the people a auarantee and a promise when that area camp'! to the City of Tigard that we were going to try to do a much better job and be more': of a closer response to, the i t. uitcitizens than that they had had w w,� s�'hile they were with 'Lhe County. And, when you talk about transportation Arid you talk about development, I think that 'the people from Trammel Crow will do you more of a job and, be of more serviceo the community by doing these kind s of planned developments. And, it we stick °`We have to do something` about hat traffic; our h�_ sand s�� . lead before we �develop this � s me �,nis land." , 16 problem 6� � Nothing in this development c to l 1 a00 were +. oing to impact the traffic any it is right note. ' � more than i ,.oi�tobi ales a day use Washington Square m . - ,. ; My, be a au,... _ u automatic counters that �,�.�n1, the cars people pick up the car, counts from the au that go in out of there. I've been at I�ashington Square on dplys there been =�rrd " �,. �. with impact in this have been 40,000+ automobiles_, There is a tremendous traffic entire area The key to solving the . problem is to Oh" developers such as Trammel Crow, people who are wiling to do transportation w. trans ortation impacts that we have We willing �.ng t,o solve the problems Of the p City --- . ; { snot de it by yourself. And I cannot do it as a 1�►xt you as a resident ,car asked ... about property develop, concerned ou people who have ked ehe pointed uuhile I m cancer i�t and land that they wish to develop, a I want everybody to have a ,fair ' ` •.:.` �+ build n° .. • wings �, : �'` • this o asked the stuestian. �.s there anyone �n the wings that is read ppartunity, � r 3 y� ; . � � � � s d • to put money' down to o∎ prt� .. i that. th i to develop, that is ,•ea A not the case. My. specific pr^o��::ct would. hamper or deny �--�- and this as n (erhd of tape) . Criteria has been met, I believe there are silfPrieci.ent restrictions that gives this Counci? control of r, his devel, ,)pnnenti the agree .► favor, . A Planning' with the .. *,� . ` "... elfin re,, t: or the Councilors and j � �ypo hu�as x rep � ly� has g usano �'" I 4.. Commission has recommended, I don t. believe staff b►. sending up some q's±r�also us to not ae to sl. tives believe there _ � �� a ,��.R at r�ther�alterna .;., body to just rubber stamp, h hoer el ...take,. that � e taff was doing I o , y and other issue and think we have done chat, I d like to have nni G!, i1S Motion by councilar? . Jca►'mson, . seconded by' c�auici1o� don, t � n int a pab1ic hearing to the lfio `er 13 ` 1989, ci vim mu meeting. ThP motion was' aFovel 13.1 Nomination of Stare Stoize, Nla tr. of Tualatin, to Serve Emergency c S�J.Yi Polr►cy J d a , RIMOLDTION NO. 89-47 APPOLNWEN2 OF SIEVE S'LCI E, 0 OF =Tai " , F�►IIC BC AS iE�; ctl : OF. ; ¶ 11 ' , 0F' b. Motion Oouncilor Eaton, ' Coul °ic.ilcir fasten,, approve Resolution No. 89-47 Rid laxti Uphoff, 10225 S.Wn:' Hillview, tic 9722; noted the concerns �,,{o,,f� his y, i ei b cho�od in giallRar ? iiic '~ been ' affected the �JJ1e at the Tigard i lai lao w requested for additional ,tip to allow for citizen ilk. Francis Brittain, 10285 S.W. Hillvi ew, Tigard, Orogen, Oak:erns ` with noise prabl s in residue tial yards questioned the prattled of n p r . • in • Mr. • ,O , with testing' for noise, levels in the lower • es. pf the ardinai a be delayed.. , • R •Lati erlddtion by amity Development 'nt ,Direr: l , existing , mit �,,, Vim: of �7rvii�~I�ntal Quality yet was not �cwer �'' �, ofneed the per' " prcpa3d . He additional onal 1!s ' ' 1t forth daring ' � the Public te� �n :.. �70N]iyC].1. making a decision on the odi i'Iance. • After discussion, so sipi l �ooa�sealsus was `to . cons as , would ,� o e �cla ity to ,he ting tar ah advisd�d the nom' 1� ' .:. ' rat 1 of He • 'followed h by staff is preparatxari of thE. of Ordinance No. 89 -16; the lc Hearing was catinued Jull, 101 1989. LEGIBILITY ST ease. ce of Proposal was Not Sent to DI' Indicate WhY: statewide Planning Goals are inapplicable ►s yrriar to the pinal DeaaC3 nq, �rrer�genc;�r Circtancee Rquired:, Expedited Review .ter.. -.: et Stittewide Coals Which MI Apply any State or Federal Agencies, local rment or Local Specini Service Districts Which may be Interested in or Impacted by the 1+Wop Direct Question afd C: .ents To: TH . LIY)EN . L RD 13125 SW HALL:: �LVD� , TTGI�RD CJ t 97223: Send 110: Department of Land Conservation and be elopment 1175 Court Street, Salem, Oreg ®n '97310 -0590 ; n attac& % , I Copy the Adopted Nation to od r tee (3 l . . Bonnd llaterialt ansl lIape 'Lax* 1/2 by 11 l nhes re needed, lease contact the. DECD office rwt If more copies of this form m p Ip! z ice esults in an exten ent s sioaa�ol��ttie �» 50, or this fo � il�uce to pr 37 3 00 . rsa May �e �tuglicated on green a erd ca � ... of an adopted plan or land Ilse regillation wren, appeal period. Appeals Way he filed within' 21 dapa of the date' the pr®poSal is Statutes °,e;E�quire mailin within 5 ,days the action hecomiog firtail _ ref tailed to DLCD� 9" (See OAR 660-418.4040). DLCD File :Number , pa >adoptform * * FOR DIED =nag USE * * 4. Comprehensive 'flan' P,:mendment PL ease complete CA) for text amendments Summary of Adopted'brief ascription ' �c a highly technical, terms and ,zone code abbreviations• "see attached."): Describe Hew, the Apt ed Amendment Differs fro the Proposal (If it is ,t same, write "Same." If it was not proposed, writer. "N /A. ") If the Action Amends the Plan or Zone Hap, . Provide the Following, InfornaEt J i for Each Area Which was Changed (Provide a separate sheet for each area P single adlo. tion action, 'Please include Sheets can be submitted as a sin P Multiple include street address when user possible. 'Do not use tax lot number alone.): Previous zone: New zone: A-4� REaiDETIAL 4.5 UNITS /A��„^ -P (PR+0FESSIC IA commERcI Location: 9220 9260, 9330.':LOCUS7';.. ,,107.75 .SW. 92ND: , 9225. &,92 MAPLELEAF NORTHWEST .DE THE LINCOLN N CENTER DEVEUD Acreage. Involved: 1.84 ACRES .. Exception? Doe: this Change Include a Goal For Residential Changes Please Indicate t e Change lin A love ]I 'Units Per Net nitre lou Pro'r" s Derisit�r � � , Y ,. .. � Y., 4wn.��' ,, I I —•,:t all +'.' Also approved was an amendment fej the Metzger. PrOgreSS contioni r � den t` tt`!'` t�rle �i:;�= .��lr.�r►ara!rir�"� !R br alignment of Lincoln Street ad j I I 3125 SWHaO Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Ti gard Petitioner espondent. NOTICE OF INTENT TO Notice `is hereby given that Pet:Ltioner intends to appeal. �.1 es� ondent 431.1 t tled. O t 'of Tigatrd that .and use de �,,, ss.on of R � Y °�; Oregon inance No. 89 -17 which bete ,na. .on June .2 3 ,1989, and whi . h involves an approval . of two °Comprehensive Plan Amendments ° and Zov a Change Requests and . an ; end tent -43 the Metzger Progress Community Plan. petitioner is represented by Robert D. Greave Habernigg & Wyse, 900 S. W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 190'©, or lan Oregon 97204, ph: (503) 228- X8448. Respondent, City of Tigard, has as i t mail ling address ai telephone number: 13' 12 5 S • W . Ball Boul vaird, 97223,,_ ph: (503) 639 - 4407; and has V. Ramis, C ° Donnell, Rami it Elliott & Crew, :1727 Street, Portland, 97209 h' ...... r �" X03 ) 22;2. -440' � � P �, PleM r . 7.Applxcant,, Crow Oregon Inc., was represented ted $n the Oregon, Inc. President of Crow-Oregon below by David Blak ;.. Other persons mailed by the City of Tigard, as matter, include Brian ;and Anita Ha .vcrsOfl 10180 S.W. Maple Leaf Portland, OR 97123 Crow- Spieker- Hosford #88 10300 S.W. Greenbur' Rd. n_00 Portland, OR 97223 Chow -0i egon, Inc. 10260 S.W. Greenburg Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 Jack and Alice Coryell 9900 S.T. 92nd Portland, OR 97223 Al.d�n and Alfred Chaves 9900 S.W. 92nd Portland, OR 972 3 Robert and Thelma Martin 7119 S.W. Taylors Ferry Rd. Portland, OR 97223 Donald and Joyce Sharbrough 10050 S.W. 92nd Portland, OR 97223 Bruc61; Miller, Robert Mathesofi' Mane Baker 9495 S.W. Locust St. Fortland, OR 97223 Richard Bogumil, James Baker 9445 S.W. Locust St:, Portland, OR 97223 written notice of the land use decision indicated its records in this ated by i otice of Intent to Appeal;' Barry Helm 9255 S.W. Maple Leaf Portland., OR 97223 Crow- Spieker- Hosford' 0117 By Trainmen. Crow Co. P.O. Box, 5396 Portland, OR 97228 Marjory Haglund 11075 S.W. Hall Blvd.' Tigard, OR 97223 k+dichael and Joyce Ruff 1.2150 S• W• 124th Aventte' Tigard', OR 97223 Lester Craft, Zelma'Ruth 2025 S.W. Broadleaf Dr. Portland, OR 97219 G.D. Maurer 2 517 Quebec Eugene, OR 97401 'Harry an Beverly Loos, 9365 S.W. Locust St. Tigard, OR 97223 Marilyn Ierbster, Dean Weber 9175 S.W. Locust St: Tigard, OR 97223 Mark and Mary Vander Yacht 9125 S.W Locust St. Tigard, OR 97223 "Ls aarj ar °e Tbe+ nn new: and Hero; rian . an Teresa Bean L 9225 S.W. Maple Leaf Port an 97223` iyone: des desires to participate as . a pa .; ini th'i case; ' before. the Larid, Use Board of Appeals must file with the Board' Intervene i . _ a Motion to �xite xi the s : pro��edia as required "b saasrassaszni sa aenR snceftse— e-^=ssssiQSSii eas Aitaea issa Modify and approve the a taahs0 ,;ordinance saaisssaiguma aisslsastsssa isize#smtsasssx,nsaeaassd , ,112,116,‘11111g1., Staff :�.�aas �s►es�sss:�ssssssnss sssae�a�ssslsssssaeaaess�assssa�sas�esssat�s� :Aitss�rtszs4 s setiiasea recommends apps attached 10i�; a1 O der. Staf fc rep. c�era�l of the ai�ta br: Crow. ka1 UI 0 arc . ®F' TIGARD ORDINANCE'. NO. RE N' bRDINAN E ADOPTING ::FINDINGS 1AN1 idONCLUSIONS T LAN AMENDMENTS ANP 2048 . CHANGB REQUESTS . (Crow -4ra THE -. ta'1'ZG8R- P8OG088$ Ch o uwITY PLAN RwD + DECLARING AN 8 5/2C89 -0 ) TWO A S; WHECREAS, wCt...v= Aragon, nc. ha® *quested a C ,mpret,eneive • P]'an, 'i ndnent f.r tely, Medium 'Deneit�y Reeds��nt,ial ` to caanaierc3�a"�� ?�rofe�esonal' on� � ,apPrnacirra acres and .a zone i hvaige ' a o R -12 (Re5identiai, • 12 ..unite /aare�1 to (Co miercial`' ,Profession a.) f also • a ,request, tor' '1 a 'Corapreheneive' Plan Amen from Low, Density Residential' to'. Co imercit 1 Profeaeional and ' a lone .04140 from ft-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units /acre ta' C -' oa approxiMately 1.8 acres ;, and finally, an amendment to the, iettger- Progress [ C nunity Man, to change'' the alignment o f SW 93rd Avenue (Lincoln S'd f et ); and of . find ngs to. *the' City, of gf made reodtaendata;� RBAS, the, Planning Ara , g ' � public hearing on May 2, .1989g and . Tigard Planning 'Commission' at a ', WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a pub1i,c heating on the proposed charges on May 15, 1989 to review Planning & taff: and ,Planning Co mi6 ` *. n' recodnnendations. as ' w ] 1` as ,public testimony. • NOW, INIEHEF0HE, THE CITY' OF TIGARD OHDRINC AS FOLLOWS: WS: '! SECTION p po i,ateflt with al]. relevant Criteria based .upon{' I 1 a The ro ®al ie coins ` cts, findings,, and conclusions acted below: the fa 9� FACTS 1. Location 9220, 9260,, 9330 SW Locust Street; 10175 SW ''9;,Irid Street; 9225 , 25600 Mapleleaf Street (WcTM 151 35AR,, tas lot! 700, 701, 7 , , 900, and parts of 2800, 2901 and 1002) 2. 8_ a kground information �- ro erties were annexed. to the Ci.: F ','' , , g+e ,The ®ub jec�. p 1 t of T April, 1987. Prior to the annexation, two land ; use a (Comgre.. -..c iv® Plan' AOOnt nt, p'a D Washington Citouutyo Also, it w . agreed at tRat betw►ee S cial use Permit) were and county that all. appl cstiane in process at the ' continue even if the ��ina1 decision 'occurred after an ni�exat A Comprehensive Plan Amendment land Bone' Change ,(Cage EZ Change the land use designation '�5rOm ',A -5 (Rt0niat ,vial` 5 and inntitutional to 0-0 (Office' Commercial) on "j arcs, y .: . k street and went" of Lincoln, Stred im�aetiatel north o Board of Ca�is�eia►ner ®;,�ara , 19, i987 f Oa was approved by the r:dt , �.a aplirek.ora en. ,. filed: wit i is the City COI ORDINANCE NO. Page 1 n a�nI ,t,fl", its acre) e ' 1:ocat d +sac 4ns • A Specfr;el Use . Peirmit for' a parka* g lot 'Case , �,c 1. eicle�ntirll , zcnd granted , "by. river count on y �.3 1987, for four re Y arc ws'bs corner :,of I ocust Street !d '''Co parcels , '.located'. at the ,south Streets The ' residences • off," . these , properties ,,' were! cesoved and parkins , area was dGvelopec��. The .conditiofl a of app��,o'val ittposed . p it- , has ,the county , remain in "eff,®ct. " Als'o, since this .roper. , y • hexed and- the.'City does not' allow comwereial parking lots Tres d�entiad eonen, this post on of the Lincoln ;Center pa king `lot a nonc`onfaarminc use. ' igard Cit Counci'' .Kov,ed 'the" rezonint of thei On- Nay 18, 1987, the ri y - err- � g annexed ,area •in, Motzger: from Wasbigton County designation®' to city', Count zoned This " designations which most cla+sely renem'hled she y • . ordinance • (No 87-x22 )' "became effac ive on June 13, 1987. Subsequent reviews utilised the City Comanunity Develol*Uent: rather , than the County i regu] ations . • A. Site Development Review (8DR 87708. and 87 -07) wad conducted ' by City staff in June, 1987 for an approve,„' to :construct a 12 -story office buitding. It was approved eubje!., : to -.16 conditions. In June of 1910, the Hearings Officer for the City. of Tigard approvd, a C.ond tionai Use ' permit,, requaAt to all4 i the coastructtion, of rooftop helipor�. atop the a sq/ky constructed` Lincoln Tower office building. This ap'plicatLon was approved z jet t to 13 son:iitions. zn March, 1989,, the Di rector • s de,eignee approved with conditi.one 's request for several lot lin(► adjustments. and a minor land .partition creating a : new tax lOt at the Southwestern corner of the' h Lincoln Center property M 89,,06/HLP810 -05 ) 3. Vicin.it_ v Informat; on Refer to the. z oning ma p attached to 4. ei ta information The Lincoln Center property ie presently . developed with six o f ice Q. . ' eldin a with a pro e® f1 oor area of a pp - y fe t ad ��o parking s tructuree on a � otalof �ven j !r ep4Qp, 0h l,• 0 Tsaq*u al r e t t e • 900 lied northeastern corner og the ropsily ad, ie amt ®n zoned R412 (140i4am Density Resid�nwia' 12 �inita are rr sly north Of it ie & p6**ion Of tax lot 1002 ;whic i + ailsO Cl) � ,Cao�nediai: parcels are ieamediatel inset of Li col*i 'Street and �.oned R, -� Hoth t and' the portic+n f 00 t 10 y th® combined area ct... ex �.ot 9 j,approaimately, 2290 eq. ft4 ie proposed (Coannae ciah professional) : W C u a The applicant also propodes to change the c p s her�etate psi z�ining des ignatioin Of eight residential parcels .` a� ro cimai�i , acr a) immediately to the eavt i of ,Lincoln Cent+ ► , babe igting block bord. t Stt'eest t� the north ," Sid, 92 :' ,►vi erect by 8W Locus he aaet, Ma plal ®af t o the south ,and Sh west, we1U.l as a' po tion of tea L ore 8 (zCi nc n,�Stars: et ORDINANCE NO. S' Page 2 a u' vJ . ,,' - ,' ; ,, , ' ' ' ' • ''' , ''' ' , , ., ' ' , ',. - ' ,' , ' , ,,, ' . '' . , .., ' . ',, ,, . ,,_ , , . , , ,.., . , , , , ,., „ , , 1112ieilto the ',:''aPrii icelii, -',,La ' ,Oquit,•01;0,04, ,,,gut ,, „ onKiit*,eiri't ,tci'''1,;ithei `itetZger:,,,:',',, ComMue4,'ihy 14e; ,,po, that the , iocist*on, .,c,I.,'..:(tittC■giti: .:, h1:.:.;704i,, 'oeut:: be ,:etilitult,,,,:,,.; ,'' ' ., '• : ,':,', ,, ,,, , ii ' • No . trait it world '; be -aligned :44 t.4441. ' 92t1id, ',;ktioestileti.e' 'at;:',7:',,iatiei',. Street. ',', , The ,;" ,; '. '', ;,,:.,,,,, e,s-aigt4.64 ' "section cif Litzo(31r,,4 !' Strivt," ;11:oe#%teeri, $01102.*f,‘ ::'ArS,,*potigt ;:4::,'.. ,i...*rbpdeed to be ',,tractited.''.':.,",; ' ,:. ''''' ',, ' . ; ,' :.,, ,,,: . , ', ',,. ,,,..': ' , . ontainin therefore oiaprehenafve Plan. Thr 2,800 atnd 2.901. )a 'are, owned ` t' not available;, for reel dent Isetftutional Metzger-Progreee:';,�l.a�n 'fhe' Katy Council, conaludoa that the prapoeal appUaable Ce aprehensive ' Plan peal ivies a ,,1 as f iii iinga si. 1. Po1,i x'1.1.2 lamentation, Stk.:;‘t 2 (.'a9 en., ; d : j Section,, 18.22.040) requires that ',applications of this, conoiaeteat ` with talc/Vent police ,,,o2 the Comprehon®ive Plain, not' have an adverse affect the hea1th, ,17aafety` , and .giwelfare' of :� e. coiai ty=' be oonsietont with sta t ,wide planning, goa ,ale , id show' that there s av dance of a. chartge�',' in, the' neighborhood or a mistake tnr ,i ncossistency in . the. • C prehe .eive : P„an rar �coa g: � ,.. pap. The gtppiicable . pol.i ci s, Statewide g°ala, ,safety!, awl welfare of the cr,amnnity are ..1 diecesaia,lo • that followed. A ,number of physical MetFg Or School neighborhood, an avi dence com.truction and accelerated % commercial actin the , west and on the, 'periphery of 'ttie subject, ereei eince the adoption o£ the I4etige c `Progu aJ1 C.oimaunl 1983. "Tie growth in camMorcial develop nt . has' envisioned. in the Plan, however severa l changes fr°csa' to commercial .coning designatioxns . were a, setw ed : since ;1983. Tae g y}p t rac -art � devel.o�+''�i�61ntA� A /�v, Qzwea�, g . gn t ons in the 'area,-„..and *"��aQS91A1� the aAonin deal a that e4f f iciest changes circaL. ,etanc i ihave 'OcOrliiricoid the proposal. 1.. Po is 2.1.1 is eaiti-.fied . pectose ,property owners 4,ero given notice, of thee' oppOrtunit to comeen on the �ppliCarte' e:00 a Poliq 5.141 is efitie ied because t'..e additional► t. iircial area added to the `Cit e' ie .lane iii it *II a reau3.� : 'Awl thi'e pi. o p►o will oet�er the creation; of. '0,,, c +employ an ; 'oppcPi'tuait ,eA., Tigard 'residents and cor ceepon lriagZy boo,::, .hrs � City er'„ . onoiair PoZ cy 5.1.4 i.nc iC&toe fleet c �c � eih��u3,d not encroach unto ree den ,`ia1 neigl pt zpoiaal wily. i °set °alt in an ere t sober, ` ' C zoiaed 8.-41.5 to the north, es t, and acntth.. +ei cro ic1 nt. 'H+rrr+nver in! thf a dales, them deft s) pmeIat on the bas°' ; i sine of et Sts School wroperty a ad ai ant ors . the eaaI, practical eeatter, the ssrg+: ,et Wit . n' ex .sting resideniceiai era aj igr4fl.Gan hy®ical nch6 nilal t ion. la l x y con' vert` hd ind 'ywhi h, ' e ast : 'Ai , a ncokif on ainz� parking °oL into; a 01004' , °zonsd land. , Otliaer '°comprehensive zone char a applicatiois Piave bea►r�`, approved use could lbe identified tea axi`e ' in e *tab11 hin recede ti for this case. e Cit • s' 'd.ereif Policy s�.l:'1 :'i'e satisfied 3aeceuseh stoclrr , will .not be . sigiif Cartiy affect by i+, e° loss - single,. 2aaai y residences. sae ° City continues 4,to sul building pzrnaitts for s .ng ],e family` residences at an avera o,! appronimataly 200 µ' f o 300 per. year. ti ,. The lost l o c 4 ' residences occurred on tax northeastern portion of 'tax ;lot , ..1002 ` when this area : 'w+a; under Wacbin gton 'G*rrnty j urisdiction. It' is now H.aomaAtt �esent 00 or* Policy 6.6.1 is eatis ied', upon future develop en ' of they 'i area;. Site development review ,provisions will , sere that buffer 9 and, screening. -'be provided between any future comet Ricid , development., on .. the area 'e to be redesignated; and ,the! a xiatin single family residences east of Sir ' 92nd Xe nuca f�a�d north' ;b Locust Street. Policies 7.1.20, , 7.3. 1 and s "f .1 ' area 'satisfied b�caue�mr a ege eti pubic fac #.lities le. g. sanitary s ►ter ' ands,' w ter) enti it to weds the site Any' new .ieveldpMent jor :the,. Lircolrlt Center ,nropses'ty on the resi .gent' :lly zoned properti ®sad • ►ih be �e ui -raid F , connect to 'those .tystoms se a condition 'to .d01Kv,„v �•nt;, Publ agencies providing these fb ilities ,.sill best . notified the opportunity to cc r wt on a " # itarc ,dveo sa on the af fect ed parc ais, thereby a .imo satisfyin .. : . Polic...:Y .. 7.2:1 Must be ad ressai4d, ea, thei tia because adetitAte storm drainage' fadiill� i ea sere the site. The angLneerinrj 0,0;iiksi+on ]iii stool drains would ,need to,,,` be ., 1 '.n3te LL installation c0u•ld occur at 'itouch time wh extended ssordth :o MT Oak Stroet • Policy 8:3..1 is a..t'zefied becaust,, >the dstr1bet *'..o eerie the development of the ,a•ub o ' p onided in conjunction 'W. th Sitee Ce tops The Council concludes that the `amount t , 3 i $ ©velcpnere�`., pith. #;2re deeac! r;estrie±t3.c�n ,r u �,x � � d, J,d0 ' cf appi:ova : 1 ,1111 not be affected by , hie'' ap ►lf cstie n Engineering 3a4 vinon f'l cir' culatio i' , plan be t develcipmenit °' in al lowei plan, should ,develop not appear e'necessany tc of. thin application. The locational criteria torte that a co rdial �professii on lama may not be bordered by ';asideritial properties ,on, atone' than t sides. The ;affected parce] a " "are 3 adjacent° to other residentially . zoned paiccels nor:` on, /. aide` onY � •., y to, tt►e north:; The o residentially ,zoned pat :cls `Dare already.'' urr ivad d by .� t , d , '.a�i.�rCial rofe.r�nional an'u Tig lard school Dstrfat lap`' : three Ieid��s. The proposed raresignation+ would ,'not ;A�iter this rituiition. Mor'eovpr.,. it would result ,yin a;: ; era °' anal I cons .stem boundary between the 'coma eerc,tal and institutional zones to tae ; south and: a40 ' residential ,,,pi�nvpert': 0s. do the north -'' I , Jic se.w puzzle -cone gured coning' boundari0e eo f is ...now''.;:, the. case in 4.torth T..gard. ad in. , this'' aspecific:�� ,,ease,.;; results ,i a eu inad aquate ` buffering between use type +r ,;and .; could r=esult Ill is variance to bu`ffori0 •requiremeV�re. '; clear: `and > straight oomm vOial �i,' demarcation` �cw.�n the �� , ha�srt�.tutional ''aaceaa the south anti the ,reeid<•it+al propertied ' the '``north s de..of 8W Locust Street mi►a!+t ultimately involve:; lee ;; lend used `±ily` for. buffering and fewer :�ariancee to "'these 1C'e�,�ir®mientn. '�'�lerNfOr�ltr this criteria, has been, stet. ;� , la. Ac :es ®;� The traf g`ic study, . Submitted by the at, cent asiuthes property which is the' .subject of this application "whys lonl r used for Parking to accommodate a + oposed ' 125, 0t 0" square f o office. b''1l :ag on the Crow Oregon property .t tat is,, Igreswnit zoo .Cad C-47. The City, ';Council ,•agreest „ riithl the, Craft" c to Concluoion re l �Gi as leg. to the projected a�eot of tafiE.0 a �rb� ".± will be generated by the proposed 125.000; sgr: ara 'I foot o f3 development. The re wort indicates that this' op a►e�. ' ,r; mason to provide " for a preferred king airrang that ► .' the office projoact ^ould pro: eed ' rit rhout the' sons ch&ig The applicant has agreed, to place a c-. ed red triction ProPertY hein2 eezc u d ,six cant it only r:✓✓ay be us+ia :fear, .pore thereby limiting the traffic generation app 7cat ion, , I �, the specific impact's CrCa*;ed k must be eiraluitkid during Cite S; The tfealign meat of tiri,o],n constiti tea a minor change , "k.,,, 4 P'ua r' Y tt aa�st� ,Y�Ylidg ,bin 1.` de�i'1 .nh,� ore ente. during t1' .2'24'4'744160Y orci nanice *hall lbaicaa i paeeage and approval Sy preien ti f e3.ng lead by .a day to d'*rie;' 19139 br/CP1 89--® i . or IS IS 14 Sete, cc, v - '1H3 tY 31119VA .00I- MI. '3,ilr •g. ucvo b.. a .4- 0 46. (I ?CI O& 0/V 0311t01/A • • -Oil' 0''Z fis 'v/ //,A..e.r/N/// //!.'/Jj by is * /wiw.6ihvei Nl.a.:* hy,. •✓niii:!•S'_'/j'ilNh ao�. ' oar, f o`io3.�. oo1: s F' rc ry` t avr7�},tu ■ r1,{� ' �kp ac' A det'�L , 3:9 kSi,r' l� nw-v. _r,:eq:ie�st for a „+Con�preh0ns esi'dent of : to, , prof essi.onal � c onanerc Residential, 4.`!� , units�adre) to C- ereals totalli:n , 4-Proi,iiinSe c:Ct ∎ 1 '.. i ro tend*eni t a xo feSS10 ,s�cye . , amendment.' to the Metzger- Progres,5 : Colmnunl Lincoln Street. LOCATION: ' ';9220, 9260, 9255 Mapteleaf (WCTM 1S1 ?5Ar, Tax Lots','" 900 , and . parts ' of * 2800 , 1002). Hearing was of ,erred • , " Councilor `conceitIring be able to cus ) a , from Lbw Oeng *.ty e '-; Gtiange ' 1xo�a' ilrr`' Cc�mmercial), 9 sot requested revise ; alignmc,nt of 10175 92nd;," 9225`, 5'00 1.,, 600, Kasten decF acede ,has had discussion '. ti.t1 the subject of tlie! , public' hearing, do ver, participate and `ader'►n unbiased - decis'10M.?. others e wo: td Staff ' report by. fSenior, Planner . Liden: Hsi. referred' to a ,ma for p„ display °ed faxnliari�at3txati� s�i.th the locatlon.�� He .'toted the 't a three ce onencs to the titiliden • °'request as cent�in :d in `the 8. memorandum to the City Council f rota 'the Community Development Director dat:d' May 9, 1989: tiStaff has reVietved the application and has concluded the request satisfies `, all policies with the exception of coAcerns about traffic impacts. Public Testimony Pronents; Jack Steiger, 18436 S.W. Sandpiper, Lake Oswego, testified he owtq ��ropoelpaL lo: pe rty on B�u � evard and was . favor t he He said he belteved construct goad development fOr the C3.4. o Mike Schrech, £.%17 S,tW. Windsor Court,, Tigard, Oregon ,s testified in favor of the development because of economic: benefits as Well as amenities such as in►proved sidewalks. o Andrew Snyder, 12290 S.W. .Foothill Boulevard, (Cedar,. Hills),' Portland, Oregon, testified in favor of the request noting believed Washington, Square was the cause. of Molt of the this devea opiaent tirod*ld improve the neighborhood He said he ° building ding va' traffic 11 4; �blems � and noted cm office au��. would not he as touch traffic impact" .as a retail development. o Doris Cleiti, 9220 S »W. Locust, Street, Tigard, tiregon' testified she has vaned ttroporty at this iocatidi for tae last 20 y �' .the Pre ect ears and Was in , avor �f o Brian ;+Jean, 9225 S:W, lgapleleaf , Tiger, favor of the 'project to aecomttbodate design: o Terri Beam 92`25 S :W: Mapleleaf, , Tigard Oregon, testified she s verb much 3�.n favor Of the proposal by Trap c,A,ttCrow, , ' Oregon, test ed in the psoposed:rking `e 3 C0t1NClL MIDNDt S .: MAY 15 , 1989 'Ir o Ann Creswell, 8775 S.bri, LOCUst,, Tigard, Oregon, testified she agreed with fir. steiger in that \ was inevitable , that the , area around Lincoln Canter and Washington Square, would be developf,41. She noted she has been impressed With 7:rantatel-Crow's buLtalniss and with their desire to preserve the integr,ity of , the area. She said she was in 'favor '`tif their requegt. o Nark Vander Yacht, 9125 S.W. , Locust, Tigard,; Oregon, . testified. he was a County reSident. He 1;816 he also said he can see the development from his front-room window. ' He advised he was !km , , , , , . favor of the request; , he stated Trammel-Crow has improved the , .,' • evee,. He ' idtedl, a problem with Washiligten Square ti7aftI.c problems. . .. the c Marty Presley, 9260 c.i.:1,. Locust, ,tigard, 'Oregon,. advised; was in favor of the projel".t. r 1 , o Michael ,Presley, 9260 S.W. 'Locust, ii„gard, , Oregon, said he was in favor of the zone change as well as the., ,releci.,\itiii, sof.i': S.W. 93rd Avenue: , 1 , Rich Rogetes, 9140 SW. Locust, Tigard, Oregont'a ,said he ii,oitild, .„, . live right next to the parking structure If it was built: ii‘` live , . noted traffic I probj.ftts attributable to Wastiiiteten Square. He advised', the street to the school was narro,t ritru.t1.4.retrdetts.. , Trammel-Crow agreed Itio, allow people ,Pc.0 ,-ic thelr tars in their, pa,,:kig lot during School .functions; thi* k.,11..,,'Itinat some of lt,hia',,Itraffid problems in e 'f,S+r:ein ' " 1 ' 1 , ' ' ' " , , ,, ,,, II: ,. ,..,, ,,, ' ' ,',, ,,.„.H, ,,, " , , ,■ 1, , • 0 w athy' s ,, 8365 S.W Steve, ra represent;;tng 11P0 #8 and, a or Metzger School. "She revi.eL avel- -Cro* proposal he 'in the ca'r ard" Oregon', test ze s School Committal verajl +., tt ings held on tti! On .'April lg, t 4:iS, w cs discussa.ot on a Loco Di.stPict which, wotiild be , paid for by Trammel Cre fete t e ' 93rd roadway. At ;th & air. Davis to! comp. ,_,t, school . repreceritat res, including ' Dr. Joki vote of the request...- O+n AAa,ril 19, NPO 118 me * and they,, too, voted in favor of, the Trammel -Crow L ?:r 'proposal. ghe advised. ,this' f meeting was 0oI1 attended . ' ` Cmprovement, meeting.' in • favor On April ' 2(a, Metzger , parents net at the school with. representatit es. A future meeting, was set for May conclusion ;was drawn at this tiltie. sc oo•, On April 2(1, t'FA, the Local" School` Committee, faculty` ;and interested britents rn �t a from Trammel (crow. Support was expressed by everyone ptiesanu: On Nay 2,;' ,'the Planning Commission met: and changes :.. the, 'street. t tire May Parent- Fac+,tlty Association me.et�i.ng t was opened and , everyone • present ' was, allowe$ everyone voted in favor of the proposed changes approved' the 0 explained the background Of the proposal. Initially, they, +�hich was proposed to develop a building; on their' property already zoned fora parking structure) up gh • al o b5 feet hi' (A t 45- feet new proposal takes into onsideration comments receive David Malec, 1+0260 subject t,o Vote .. Greenburgf Road, Tigard, Oregon from the neighbors concerning wa; they would to see bappen A saVe.ra1-story it asking • structure would out -of -place with its riuburban environment. The proposed 'plan would accommodate both the parkinfm ,for' the, building as well as the nei ;hhorh000l!'s concernsbO t hizh -rise structure. Mr. Blake refa,.' ceyi tt drawings on, display Wht.ch ii,lust "rated e. V r :. A }t facility cons' st .ng.,'of one s ,�'b -gv jade x,eve,l and perking it g 4 oumd leve'1. • The land proposed for rezoning was, ini�ialiy under untyy jurisdiction. A portion of 'the 'property way hetng, :used filr Permit issued , by '1 asiinoxr parkit'ag under a Caatiditional. '' �rs* " county. i The rezone request: was ' Meade to expand .. the ' `1.aztd area upon which , the parking area could be locat~ed.; 'l;f the vote 'eras; against this, the parking spaces would do 'dec case. _ ' l 'said. he believed the propose `L if 10# .etd;, would' on , :6 p the area's, de.c.rease �±b,raf f s.c congests Page 5 COUNCIL MT►ai(JTES' K 1' wou view accommo comments f roml transportation � I P tealigrment 3bene ai caws i:ts WW1 Reduced traf f lc speeds' better "stacking" of c.' Better' increased lengt' iosed streeealiguaent no.tin area's ' reel.- oneed's . H.e ;refe'rr.-l� G f' r Oregon Department'' a favor of the, ;'`realigntnet 6l 1: • ( k fi fl 1, -� include 'promotioin Hof 1 ecause' of gen ASS. Onto 't 0i4ou t Locust reet. The reali, nment of the:" road; was done in the desires of the neighbor o ^d, the •ac tenant ;;base. ofl nts e ,curves;;. ares.,,' Street b},3caus :temp and 'tip', satisfy e existing John S. Blomgren, 9460 S. Cgk Street, Tigard, Oregon,. noted he has lived " at this' location for Many years and `eras there before Wals3ington Square was built. He , advised 'he was on , the CPO' When the planning for Metzger was done'. ' IMe not'ed' he Was involved with, ,' the County traffic circulation ' study,, ;iii 1995 r which was no With, utilized by, th City of, "Tigard . In 1980i a line was drawn ,betweet► Oak 'arid -,locust (designated' 'as 93rd Street) At that time, Traimel Crow yeas building , their existing structures and' put up ' a sign for "No Through Traffic: " This; made it d dif f icU It for, nine pieces of 'property to obtain access to major eets. t. The 93rd treet alignerznt,' now drown as a straight line ,en tine Trans t .:rt.►tion. Plan, would better accomiodate access for private property owners. Mr„, Blomgren esti:iaated the would be appeo7t mately 1,200 parking st .lis ',3n the entire Tranunel- Ccor i d+r velo r,tnenik.. :.e noted traffic problems in the aren bee..:tz, u inuresided volumes and speed, as well as, trucks part ci its, in " 'go Parking" areas . Mr. alomgren , advised he felt the proposed alignment of 93rd would not slow the traffic.'' He reiterated a straight, fully,- improved street would best serve the needs of the area, fir B? ibmgten submitted' .a list a' :of resident's' the thti Tz an�inel -Crow proposal: .. :.. o Ron Mi�L. 1 6 10620 95h Ave nsUe , iga rd basic for 1.10 p ra p oed reels n m ©nt?tre .i �►d' the euve ",' were ;oppose conf ieur at,ion: while not definitely opposed to' the 'propose', at this time, he advised he Was not " ,sure it was ne+ tsus ''y The, exit from this area has been a preblem ,and' even an e tr' 200 yards TotAs something he and his neighbors would . have t� d! &al with. o ar: Gene Devi!; 108 '5' d . 89t' ', AvenU referrer to .the 93rd Local empcove rent D .s propossed >n conce t 'tom a'Gqunci ., bit was. ,flC concer>r� ; with the' curved i:onfigtirat :ov: of proposed stree:' Page - 5; 1989 r- c+ o she ar reticle .4. are tad' nc Croy w i4r Davis` .advised hat pr party' owners '�ao�u�tha of fah street t pis' proposal said;;' �tnot� been notig'i ed `o,Ea '.the hearim `n that' =even : thouh' ` tt�e ; property ' r)o'ufh cif Oak �',�Street• was not" °-y thitt • ,250 feet c t the , proposal , � there 'was 40 es � I which' , ;;had access pro1,.i ems and +would , z" affected' ' by:. the proposed rea1iEament. equested, Coun�,i 7. delay, act a�n e�nti�l of ±te '�' ', e. onnpr 'hensirve -Plait vevi.e t a,f the tr %z entire ,Metzger; Ci�mmuittixty soy several tr f`f is ° . i.s es 'could Abe "� resolved.. Dr, Darts saint the current props s' l mould" onij' sp. lve' 'the Yrproblems' for one piece of ,prop€vty. Dr • Davis' further', idviOza. tw re ,w substantial amount',. of. propezt) o ed ' fol.' eommei ial i;levelopmen�C. He said more ,coritercial land was not needed until ;some 'of the e34stin,,''area had been developed: .Mayor Tasked if anyone south of yak Street was ready. ' °.o develop, and pay for a roadway. Dr.. Davit ,- espa�ded' ;'.ha� ha.a; eat•lier efforts to f ®ran an LID to ,develop ',93rd fi,ceet' =toad baen salceessfully blocked by I�t°. Blomgren and hid: supporters.,. • He noted he would like..., to see , the comanu�ny work tog'ther resolving the transportation Issues. In response t�:'. qur sties ±s ��rom; ;Councilor Johnson, Dr. ` Davis noted ,th 1, p�. opas d cui Ire in <t :a 93rd ;Street reap �gnmen „ ` oni,la effectively, depreciate , the posaibW1:1i4 of ,development, of his property. bav'�s' ob action to notif i.catie�n pro rs�G In response to Dr � • dayor askQd staff .f proper notwanon Senior Planner tidett advised psa�*Yic .4earng 'native eras mailed to property o hers within 250 t .�,: t of the proposal,.; t'he Cps was notified, the DPO was` notified, and ` publicat3 on appeared i,rn the newspaper. Theref ors, notice, as equit~� d by 'the :Caide vI s gi ve�►z. a Joel Adamson, 9200 s.:W. Oa 'z Tigard p Oregon, advised he was president ' of corporation, owns ' 3 1/2 acres. Re. submitted a petition 'Signed by 18 people ;in tt* area who opposed the development. Thy: prinipa reasons` }, for th,e,i„r', opposition were the traffic problems the ,,artea Ee Veen Oak Street Iland 2/7, there was ', 'MoVe • than 40.: a,dres Of ' land w4 ith coox,d be devt►.1oped` comaaertTally; ° he . idviSe 't 'he dz , not her ` about Traamtvl- Crowo's proposal. Otter the yttblie m +etings 'qere 'announeed. The tr�afftc probli+m 'needs ,to be solved so tha areal can be 'evelopad: sf the pro !�osa1, was; . adopted, it' would hinder access to tf € a't°:ea ,between ,,Oak S,tree , and 217.. tie. recommended. Wait Co prehensive Plan for the entire development Tralmel -Grntr proposal reprasktnted piecemeal d wel z; rmkie u s i the ' age 7 - CO1i TCII mImuTEs Y '15 9 1989 . Ito I *, Recommendation by e Development 'Director;', their ,Written stet'f(''' raf f is ,.,sues needed with the review of deVelopkid eve ral '. approve the reque to amend t' �J se map from Neditti !Wanssityr 'Proi eesioaal: and : the zoning ., p D+ ny ` the request to a tend the fjo prehensivi Flail fron Ln Dens it, ,Res dde ati al ' to .Cott cte* o'iei.'' , i ror '' •ton ll and ;t'��` zoning map f root -.s . 5 to C -P; o ,Deny the request .''to amend' the Plan- regarding Che realignment Street). Public Hearing was cloned. Courkicil consideration. Discussion follows: Metzger -Pi air ss 'co ianitY of 93rd,. Avrenudi. (Lincoln Not peg suadbd that by inhibiting this','` development the City would solve the traffic probl1Ats in the area. ,,a "kimensus to require deed` ' restriction, as recommended by t , Planning Commission, 'which wl9ui d limit land use of the amended parcel to a parking i c i.l t es ` use u :ly. The fact that Trammel -Crow had agreed to let the school use the parking facility for overflew parking during school functions rauld be advantageous to the net ib' rhood, Consensus was, that proper public, notice. ''had been given. In addition, the issue had been given extensive coverage in the press. Not persuaded there Was merit to the erghiment to ovtrj ail development in one area in order to force it somewhere,' else. diction on item `should not be to Seri as sign s. to the co rn y that the City wi .l �°i s t�nti. �&ue of forts resolve transportation' issues for :the er tide at'aar ConWensus was that the Comprehensive' Plan ±requirement b'een satisfied. Page 8 COUNCIL, mitiiUTES MAI 15, 1.98' a. Senior Planner L.rie.i reviewed staff wori to aate on drafting an anen&ent ''. to -th noise ordinance. Discuisicn followed on.hous that certain nose Lwels would be allowable, dequate prOteiotti0 of residential ; areas near coinntecial uses, and p2riittthg . speial events U. ., music). Snivr Planner. outlined research ‘toting a review of standards i- ;d. by DEQ as well .s ran. ar .s1 adopted by 0 - er comatUns„ A.,-publac heark.ng 4 d an this..,3:miue.:,.4tati, OaheOttie4 for June 12, 1989.. EXECUTIVE SESSIOW: The into, xecutive Session at 9:54 p.u. under the proutsions of 011$$, a). tat) , .:(1a):- to ,". property transactions, ;74tad ,current and 'pendl;ne litigation issues. .• - City of Ti / Council President cw/00711L) CITY OF OF TIC' OREGON CIL . Y AGENDA 0F: I ay .35. 51EIL- , ISSUE /AGENDA TITLE:Cxow- xenon, Inc. Conilareheneive ''Plan ` Z4mendanen, and Zone Chan. a CPA 59 -05 ZC 8 DEPT HEAD 0 CITY ADMIN 0 DATE SUEmITTED Y ,RELIC JS ACTION: Planninn.Commission earin• on 5 2 89 PREPARED , BY: Deborah 'Stua REQUESTED EY: P LTG ISSUE Whe ther to amend the Comprehens ive Plan land use and zonin g ma p s to accommod ate the Crow - Oregon proposal tr construct aincoln' center Five? INFORMATIONNSSSU Y On May 2 1989e the Planning Coamniasiorn wet and Considered a requ'a st to amend the Comprehensive Plan land use and zonin j maps and, the Metz1,ger- Progress Community Plan to allow for the realignment... of SW 93rd 'Avenue, The change ®' included: 1) a request to change 74 acres from Media Denaity Residential to Commercial Professional- and the zoning from R--12 to C -P; and 1) to Change 1.37 acres from Low Den and the zoning, sit R�►s+d ®��tial to Commercial Professioma�. from R -4.5 to C -P The P1 nning Coa nnission voted unanimously to apprOvas these rep ueste based on 9 z ,� l y be wed on the 1.37 acres findin s that the additional trafi,ic` canned. b this development would be minimal' and that a deed restriction could legal y info a to restrict the land use of the amended Parcel to a Parking facilities use only. ?&'ERNATIVES CONSIDERED' .� by Planning Commission lto include a 1. Approve the request a� recommended b the p�.nn condition that a deed restriction be drafted by the applicant and submitted to the City Attorney for review and approv,41. Also the request Ghoul b. ect City Engineer p Po � � d be su to the review of the Cit En ineer of the ro vied reai.i ent to minor collector standards. 2. the cam p rehanaive p lanand gone change ug® re qu ®ec from Methum Density Residential (R -12) to Commercial Prof. s ssional (C -P) . Dht the request to amend the Comprehenaivo Plan and zcnink dap ca 1-4V acres from Low penalty' Residential (R -4.5) to Commercial Profeeuional (C -P) and also the, request to re-align SW 93rd Avenue as originally i ended by staff. 9 �ubnmitted and as recommended 3 Approve and /or deny the requests as modified by the City Council. ?TSC1 IJ . TVA ACT None. SUGGESTED ACTIO . Approve and deny the regueate as reconmendedd by staff: A Aporov the regueet to amend the comprehensive Plan land tae map from Medium Density Residential to Commercial Profession 1: and the zoning map front R -12 to �C-�P; se P B d Deny the re e st to amend the ` �,�, . p n ; u t lan from: L��` Density dots r Residential to ` commercial Profcseional and the zoning snap from tt-'4 ' 4.5 to C -P C. Deny the re est to y qul amend the Metzger ! Commit Plane regarding the re-alignment of OW 93rd A enue (Lincoln Street )4 das/crow LEGIBILITY V TRP 94 th , A EFPERSUN WASP INOT 1 .0/ / I / - 92 Ad 92nd AVE.- 90 th 20Ih 95 tit EFFERSUti AVE. z 0 ii-4- ______ _...... --, ri ; '-= Cl2N111 CITY OF TIG1 RD MEMORANDUM TO MaYor Edwards and the City Council FROM Ed Murphy, Community Development Director RE: Crow - Oregon Inc. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change DATE: May 90 1989 At its regular seating on, May. 2, 1989, the Tigard Planning Commission vo d unanimously to forward a recommendation to approve a comprehensi 1;011.1111 amendment and zone change request submitted by Crow- Oregon Inc. This request has three components: a to amend the comprAhensive plan on tho northeastern corner of the Lincoln nco.ln Center property (tax lot 900 and a portion of tax lot 1002 tutali.ng about 74 acres) from Medium Density Residential to Commercial Professional and to change the zoning designation from 11-12 to C -P, b) to amend the comprehensive plan designation on six residential parcels (totaling 1.37 acres) bardc4red by SW 33rd and SW 92nd Avenues on the wet and east tit: Bides and by SW Locust and SW Mapleleaf Streets on the north and south aides~ from Low Density Residential to commercial Professional and the zoning designations from R -4.5 to C-P; and c.) to amend the Metz ► ,:- Progre ®tlt Community Plan to allow the realignment of SW 93rd Avenue. SW 3Sz i Avenue is designated as a minor collector street. All of the relevant statewide .Lan ].y add.f7osztr, 1 and �� d use goals could b@. Policy 8.11. mandates a.11 �cnt one City Policy mould be met. Comprehensive efficient icient Pe Y � � t and roadway system that that the City shall plan for a safe an and anticipated future growth and development" The Metzger-Progress er eta current aneede, p g - Progress Communit Y Plan calls f or traffic routing i hrough the area of the neighborhood". Staff which 3.s y "'sensitive to they residential d ate. rival of the f tret request because � this would bring the existing recommended w P use, a nonconforming parking lot, into compliance with current City zoning the second and third requeete regulations. Staff recommended denial of primarily on the b Biz that the existing Load system cannot accommodate additional `which might exacerbate the exi.tinq traffic �,itic�d9a1 " commercial developmaasn congestion, acceeo and circulation problems in the Metzger School./Waehington Square area imoueiy' tondit a that a corm ndation for The Planning Coaa�iiseion vote un�an deed areatriction 1 f 11 three re a ®tie subject wo a c approval o all be drafted by the aPplic,ant Ror City attorney, review and approval: to limit the use of the 1.37 sores now contain P_ ties use containing six residences to a parking �.acil would also only. Shoul��i Cou f Y __.. ncil decide � re�lia`e the � ropo ®� ©�a].3.g�aQnf� to most tni.nor suggest a condition which would qu P collector standards e showing current land use and zoning atiand, Attached ng dcsn. t,ac e g g � reference ilia 43 in�ntvs of the ,.,. , ,� , r Staff . repot ® the planning Ccam�aresi.c�n hearing, the eta apj iicant's aubmitta]., a E,usmnation of y 1.60a' a •S is r , . , r th�� Q p�" the � area and t 3PP' and the current street c 1assificatifnn proposed reslx g n gent of 5V, 93rd Avenue. w"1' +�C wit Jack Schwab, Attorney, 9290 5W Tigard Street,' representing Edwin & Shearon Mueller who have purchased and designed a .home , for the site would like access to Senci\view Terrace. They feel 'this. is 'a viable alternative and will minimize the impact to the site. Pu LIC TR3TrH0NY +� No one appeared to spoakk. P%ic HEARING Cs o Commissioner Peterson and Saporta shared the CPO's concern regarding traffic safety with future .development. o Commissioner Newton, Barber, Rosborough, Pyre, and Moen : shared the CPO' a concerns regarding traffic, however, eupported staff's recommendation as being a viable solution. g seconded to approve iseioner ' Rosborough moved and CoaAmisexoner Barber se s 59 -05 based on staff's' findings and conditions :, Motion , cazried by majority of Commissioners Present. Con L = stoners Saporta and Peterson voting no. 5.2 COMPREHRHsrvE CPA 89-05 & BONE CHANGB 89 ®RcC6` -, Inc. .... '.. commercial ... Comprehensive Plan �a L w Density Residential to Professional and 1 Bone change from.' ' .. R -4.5 Residential, 4.5 unit ) ( fessi: commercial) for � others totalling c -anal seven arc;�els and portions of two oth r .Pro approximately 2.21 acres - lso requested is an amendment t P �' the rasa � 'aGostmmunity �e Metzger -frog to t� Plan to revise the alignment of SW 93rd Avenue. LTI0N. 9220, 9260, 9330 Locust; 10175 92nd; 9225,'9255 Mapleleaf (WCTM 131 35AB, tax lots 700, 701, 702, 500, 501,, 600, 900, and parts of 2500,1002) Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart reviewed the prropoea.l, stokzo changes in the the staff rePort, and dude s taEf ® recommendation for approval of the Comprehensive P1an Amendmec and On 'change for lots 90m and 102; denial of the Cc mprehet:Aive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for the,' six ' residential lots; and denial of the regtaest to amend the Metzger - `< progress community Plan. Discussion followad re gaa r rding the proposed. develotent. Woi1e Y, Cit y Engineer, addressed traffe4,c concerns stating that Proposal could restlt in major chan g es t- Highway 217. 'i3soqa3iof f ollowed regarding who would bear the cont. of a study, alternative accesses ro the area, traffic cl,rculatimn, traffic capacity, surrounding zoning, access to 217, and signal zation; PLANNING tS8I01 IIINUT88 M 2, 1989 PA APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION David Blake, Partner,, Trammell Crow Company, 10250 Ski Greenb rg Rana , Portland, OR 97223, reviewed the existing ' site acid ` propos <d structures which could be c©, structed without the -Proposed Conpr hen,skme Plan pimerud ent. He reviewed the layout Of existing tra2fi.c patterns. He revieweC the proposed structures' if ''tire C& prehensive Plan, Zone Change, and • Hetti ge:lr - Progress Community Pit ^ T1a°1'-_^e e,. nde 1. He reviewed the, proposed . road alignment, ` adding• that the propoeed alignment would Provide a better ` collector street and that the Scheel, Would '- benefit 'by additional parking and better screening. Discussion i fcll wed with Commissioners regarding what wOUld be rseatitted, what is proposed, and the road alignment. Commissioner Newton 7 sZt 8:35 PM o Cathy Chase, 8365 SW Stave, ` Tigard.; OR 972230 stated she is 'a member of of the Parent Pacilit Association at 8 et She read r: adnand member ubmitted' written teatimcn regarding ardin m etin gs she School. Y � 9i g e had attended and they results of ilhose meetings. She wanted! the Commission to know that she had talked with a number of people in the community and th4 people favor the pP1icant ° s proposal with the Coprehensive, Plan A e dment. y , 0115 SPA' 92nd, Tigard, OR 97223, tau lot 501, has laved in the area for Andrew Spa d ®x �. 20 i n. felt the traffic problems were created by the sthepping center ' He supported the applicant ° s request. Ann Creswell 8775 SW Locust # 13, Tigard, OR 97223, favord the proposal. o � , 9T223 Jack Steiger, 18436 SW Sandpiper, Lake Oswego, OR 97036, supported ";he proposal: Mrs. Mork, Daughter -in -Law for Doris L. Kiel' Jell, 9220 SW Locust St., Tig.rd, OR, 97223 supported the proposal M 'trr•:°ty Presley, 9260 Sw Locust, Tigcrd, OR 97223, tax lot 700, favored the pa ropoaal6 Michael Presley, 60 SW Locust Tigard, OR 97223, favored the proposal, �'o �+ 1 s stating that he did not Went to live next to a six stor,V pa_ktn structure. Brian Bean, 9225 SW i4..pleleaf, Tigard, OR 97223, lot 500, supported the 9 1) propose), 2) Ro one wants to Different group already s+�ig�rp�oart the proposal. the ' ollowiaa �easeJnF9. live next to a . eft , sto . aa�is Y r'3r P 9 structure. 3) The new road being proposed woUld benefit "Metzger. Schwa► . �d b Rick Rogers, 9140 SW Locust, lot 202, Stated that he iS the closest residential property and in in support Of the opose . „d p c eveeloPdent, Re stated that the existing roads are in shabby condition. Aloe, the additional Parking for th+ school. will increase eafetY. PLANNING COMISSIONI MISS & 2v 1959 PAGE' 3 ce mark Vander Yacht, 9125 SW Locust, Tigard, OR '72.23, lives in the County. His basic concern Ls traffic created by Washi ngtarn Square. Be ' felt Trammell Crow's project would have a limited impact. Berri' Helm, 9255 SW Hapleleaf, Tigard, 0R, 97223, t t 702, supported the requeet. Brian Balverson, 10180 SW 93rd, Tigard, OR 97223, tax lot 701, has the only hone which faces the Trammell Crow project. If the six story parking structure were approved he is _ close enough to count the bricks'. Be sup arted the proposed request with the "ground level parking structure. John S. Dlomgren, 9950 SW oak, Tigard, OR 97223, opposed the proposal:. Re felt traffic concerns should be taken care prior to development. REE0TTAL o David Blake stated they recognize that t. ire is substantial traffic in the e area and support urban renewal; however, improvaments !gill not happen if development is prohibited. o Dicussion followed with staff regarding ; gproval of the Compreheraaive Plan Amendment requiring a deed restriction for the residential pit sties and improvements. to SW 93rd Avenue. PUBLIC EMItING CLOSED Consensus of the Commission was to support Trammell Craw''s proposal, especially since' they have the support of the neighborhood. Trae Commiesian also felt a deed restriction should be requires for the residential properties limiting development to a parking structure as p ro sad po . They recognize y gn that traffic problems need to be addressed. Co missions Fyre roved and Commissioner Barber seconded to forward a rOcAmnendation for a PP r�ral to City Council= further recommending that City Countill impose a deed restriction limiting the development on the residential property' to a two single sto ry p arking structure story at grade level) Motion carried unanimously by Consnissioneri Present. RECESS' 9:15 PM 5.3 ¢ request for a Cofsni ercial to Medium High (Pros eseional Commercial) to R-2 acres. Also, a Coimprehenaive Plan“ Map Residential to medium-Nigh Density Residential and a 12 (Residential, 12 Units /acre) to t for 3.02 parcels but each other. . 1441a AMENDMENT cPA 89-04 mur 3 /POSC0 LANDE ►* 2 A • a.. -lnens�ive Plan map anaenslnacr.�. from Professional 'y Residential and a zone change froi CP denttal, 25 units/acre) fcr 1.75 ent frOM Medium-DerteitY change from it- acres. •r. it Cll P] dNI G satOE' M1N0TES 19e9 - P AGE ,4 subject ' STAFF REPORT FDA ITEM 5.2 MAs 2, 1989 TIGARD . CITY MAIL `4,:3 HALL TIGARD PLANNING CoMMISSION • 13125 SW NALL BLVD • TIGARD, oaEGON . FACTS d ▪ General Information CASE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHARGE CPA '° 89 -05 /ZC 89-05 'REQPE:.T. For approval of a Comprehenr .ve P lan, Amendment fit„ a one Change request to change the com p rehensive Plan designation from Lew Density Residential to Professional, Commercial and t(* change the zoning designation from R -4.5 (single Family Rea,dential, 4.5 unite per acre) to C- , �• g acres. Also � Professional) �► g 1.49 P C�l�ata ®y�cial. Pr�a�Eee ®ional for 6 a� ;ceZs tc.�f�:a..ia� a coinpr�ehensive plan amendment to change tax lot 900 and the aorth® a .tern Portion of tax lot 1002 (� �out .74 acres) from m a Medium Density Residential designation to a Commercial Professional designation n .. w and to cba:1gs the zoning on it from R" °12 to l. C -P. Finally, an amendment c has been requested to the Metzger - Progress Community Plan to revise the .elignment of Lincoln street (93rd Avenue). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DE4IGNATION: Low Densekty Residential, Medium Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5 (Single Fagaily Residential, 4.5 units per acre) and R -12 (medium Density Residential, 12 units/acre) APPLICANT: Croy -Orr, 0n, Inc. 10260 SW Greenburg Road Tigardc OR 97223 ; , P �. ( X25 EOOAT;L+aN. 9220 9260, 9330 SW Locust Street; 10175 SW 92nd Street; 9 9255 6S1 Ma leleaf street WCTM 161 35AS, tax lots 700, 701, 70 ;40 00, 501, 6001, 900, and parts of 2800 and 1002) 2 '• �ackg ound Information Tho subject properties Were annexed to the City of Tigard in late April, 1907. Prior to the annexation, two land use applications (tomreheeneive Plan Amendment, Special use Permit) were filed with Washingtdn coUntY. Aldo, it waSS agreed pit that time 'between the City and Courntys that all, apg lication a in proc? Se at the County would continue even If the final decision occurred after' annexation. STAFF REPORT - CPA 89. -05/5,,c89 C89 -,off - ` CROW OREGON - PAGE A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone 'Change "(Case No. 87- 73--N) to change the land use designation' from Y3 -5 (Pesie ential, 5 unit =: /acre) and Institutional to 0-C (Office Commercial) on parcels located immediately north of Oak Street and west of Lincoln Street extension, was approved by the Board of commissioners' on May 19, 1987. A Special Use Permit for a parking lot (Case No. 87 -122. SU) was granted by the County on May 13, 1987, for fotr residentially zoned parcels located at the southwest corner of Locust Street ' and Lincoln Buret. The residences on these properties were removed and a parking area was developed. The conditions of approval imposed' by the county remain in effect. Also, since this property has been annexed and the City does not allow commercial parking lots in. residential zones, this portion of the Lincoln Center parking lot is a nonconforming use. On May 18, 1987 , the Tigard City Council approved the rezoning of the andannexed area in :` ¢:.lger from lashington ,y ounty designations to City �ro designations which most closely resembled, tha County zones. This ordinance (ado 87-22) became effective on June 18, 1937. Subsequent reviews utilized y t the i.li� ®d th® pity Coa�ntun.ty' D ®vec�pa�,A t'e rather than County regulations. A Site Development Review (SDR 87-08 and V 87 -07) was conducted by City atarf in June, 1987 for an approval to construct a 12 -story office building. It was . approved subject to 16 coedit nF- In June of 1988, the Hearings Off cer for the City of Tlg= rd apprt ,ijd a Conditional Use permit request, to allow the construction of a rooftop heliport rt atoms the newly constructed Lincoln Towe r office building. This application w., a approved subject to 13 conditions. In March, 1989, the Directo °'s designee approved with conditions a request for several lot line adjustments and a minor land partition creating a new tax lot at the aouthweatern corner of the Lincoln Center property (ft 89- 06 /l4LP81 „' -OS). . Vicinity nfo ation Please refer to the zoning , imp, attached to this report as ; "Exhibit Bo. 4. Site Information The Lincoln Center property is predevtly developed with rile office buildings with a gross floor area of P.Pproximately 530, 000 square feet . an the p structures * On a total of seven parcels. Tarr lot Lies northeastern the ro 900 and two askin struct � P Ae�y and is currently �on�i' i�E -12 corner of �J � a (Medium Density Residential;, 1t, units per acre). Imm,sdiat„el north of it is ;a portion of tax lot 10%12 i hich is also zoned it --12. Both ,parcels are Immediately west of Lincolnn, Street and the combined aria of tax 1Ot 960 STA.FI REPORT - CPA 89-- 05/ZC89 --b5 . CROW OREGON .- PAGE 2 iu wilt ommi m w b' i and the portion of tax let 1002 .(approximately 3250 sq. ft.) is proposed t� be redesignated as C -P (Commercial Profee= .iona1) The applicant a1 o prcopo es to change the compr heaaive plan and zoning designation of six residential parcels (appsrc+ximately 1.47 acres) immediately to the erst of Lincoln center, consisting of the blocs bordered by SW Locust St1 a ;t to the north, SW 92nd Avenues to the east, sw F!4ap1eleaf to the south and SW Lincoln " Street to the 'west. i Thesse parcels are all currently! zoned and developed as R-4.5' (Low Density Single Family Residential, 4.5 units per acre). The applicant ,Mates ghat these changes are needed so that a ,new, 123,000 square foot office building, c; 11ed Lincoln Center Five, can be constructed ,' at the , northeastern; portion of the Lincoln Center property and meet City of Tigard Community DeveloPmest code requirements for a sufficient number of on•-:site Parkin spaces- It to anticipated that a two-story parking structure constructed upon. the lid bordered z°iF � 9 ti-ssactuse will. be , p end Avenues. by SW Locust, Lincoln 1,Sa 1m51essnf and 9. Finally, the applican t is meg testing; an amendment to the Metzger Community Plan o that the location of Lincoln street can be changed so that it would be aligned with 92nd Avenue at Locust Street. • AC p 111c and NPC Con mente The State of Oregon Highway Division comments that 'although the Trammel Crow proposal addresses project 2 of the ErAtzgeriprogrese circulation Study (SW Lincoln Street /93rd Avenue propcssed extension nssion south) , there problems, i.e. g. # ® g zoning add The Divi a. The pri wary traff is aceese to this cite i.a , via .' Groenburg E taiad ' Gr g aai. y is� experienc.iaag sub = tantia1 tra�f £io" e�xabur Road in t�ais v9.c3. , congestion. It is' :unlikely that the trafiEie conc�eation in is ai.s vicinity will be reaelved mar ;siy by ,adding traf fie ]ones and ` sic a� i.a Inatoad, it will likely be nece ®wary t o provide new roaciv;ays or ✓ evise the alignment of , d�xisting soaelwa a to pro ids adequate capacity b tween Bighway 211 and the eoOmercial deve16.i'. ente along Greethurg Road. • it� aubre ant.ia . property with G -P • ; y b. Thero currently ex�.Ste ira th® �3:cin ,� t an CrG g ial ,.,.yc: �+ atantisal; de ®elopement o zonin �d pratcE3nt �- ✓ edovelop tent. Deveflot ,,4ent or redevelopguent oi; these exi ►tins G -P ' and y . increase the traf f i►. detandte C -G propa3rtZee could eubetaa�tia]:l on Greenburg Road near Highway 217. Aa mentioned above, t0@ street . impro! ennente typica]L].y req. red. as conditionB of developitent +W4k not 4 a b adequate to provide the additional traffic capacity need foz full development under the exi.eting sonitg." zone provides the potential for develop tent with medh higher traffic demands than the existing R--4.5 coning. d. :Currently, 0 -P zoned prot,,Irtiee between Oak Sty s t ... q an - mlight.74y 217 have very poor access to Greenburg Road and Sig y � aQ 10 eway ramps, traf f is skit i.ng frca yak ` Streets y, ie prohibited froze turn fl left; , dsoath) Sato Greenberg road. Therefore, traffic frost' ticae 0-15' propertie .fiaa. ad no 10041 r� ids a to - g y except by g gh t i g ntial - .. BIi ha�a 21? axes t b driviri chrou ®treats. The � etzger- Pragreae Gircalat %n Plata adopted Y Count y i n 1�8G p r Pe ®ee to provide new accost/ from Oak 1FTSa t®rhe3. en t g ttoo aa y _ , Greenberg Wad by extending 93rd Avenue sontb f rod Comet Street to 0sk 8treett, Traffic from Oak Street could then reach the freeway by • driving n+" frth on 93rd; wrest on Locue+t tre t, and tben south On "S3reenburg goad. This wouid Still require the Oak Street traffic to r n in order to �• o a, roa�imatQl a darter of a e�'lle Out of c�iwectio w, g pJP Y � avoid making the illegal left turn from Oak Street onto '.Greea1.burg Road. 1 the applicant propoaee to r©align 93rd Avenues moving its inters _._ eecti`t With Locaast Str+eet: £urtch ®r east. ', • the grapoeO realignment would increase the out of direction raveL or cols fo treet r traffic attempting to reach Uighw Ay 23.7 vie Gr t g . thet __: a fr xn lob denait'' reeidear ;;.i.al to e e commercials f could further ® ins ea®e existing traf fr y f,.r it is unlikely that � �' further a „ �are.- that: under the +��ci ®ting Pl�e+ fc robleare�� t s cf develo eat on such ro rt: c0u' de ately �• " w � P P'e �' . , ndit i�►n the usual co robleaui . Thear ore .. _the . Ci� Fn .near P address that traffic rert�rccm d at thisa tam3,► ends ..that the: zone than a be deraie VD Uk. f . It. appears the, the proposed realiohmont o93rd AvCnue would ftirthe '�' eh lid � e e increase the dlif f icult of access between Stre p open • . y . ci ethw y result ►u1d be currentl �o�eed C P ar�d R � e esidential aareae o£ ,.Qais tree increased t.raf f is tharo gh. the. r -. . A . ,R ... STAFF PODT.. cps 89- 0g/zcS9 -o5 c�w oREGaN - PAGE 4 •. • vl Therefore the' Cl tv Rn4-ineer recommends that the IEmon sec amendment co the iMetzger•- Press Circulation Study be di,en� ie t at thi The proposed new alignment of 93rd Avenue does not meet C,i t standards, as the curve radii are too short. af a new alignment is approved, it should be re uuired to coni Sly with existing City design standards for a `minor collector street. h. Additional Engineering and `Planning review is required to resolve the traffic problems of this area which are inherent in the existing sweet layout. Suc h a, r eview should go through t1e ' qrmal. comprrhensive planning prod),ess and would likely result in adoption of revisions to the existing traffic circulation: plan.s a part of such review, the potegre a l for additional C -P zoning and potential street realignment 00',nld be inv.®stigated, A possible joint te:. ,sting of each a studyt has ';Deer discussed with major r property owners .n the area; however, to date, . h a review has not been initiated. i. The exiting aunit xy ewer system in Locust and Mapleloaf streets apper :s to be adequate to accomsoodatt the proposed sorts change. Therm is acurr rit'y no storm drainage syatem to serve the proposed zr:ne change ar$ a, except for minor ro. dside' ditches. If the site is redeveloped, it will be nAressary to provide an ad hate sti. c s e drain system extendi: l to Ash Creek. It is likely that the storm drain would be installed in con juncti'LNtA with the extension and improvement of 92rd Avenue. Recomm+ ndation of E.n, gineerincg. Divisict s Deny the request for Comprehensive Plan/Zong Chaun ie until an adequate traffic plan is developed to address increasing traffic problems. 2. Deny the request for a r? vision to the proposed 1.,lignment of 93 ed Avenue ( Lincoln street) until a plan has been identified to provide' better access between the Oak Street C -P properties and Highway 217. No other comments were ,re x ' .,Aadl. . ]FINDINGS TIAND COLIC USIO U The re levant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, inn 10 and City of Tigard Comprehensive ri.'1an policies 1,1.2 im p lra:enta Lion Strate 9" 2, 5-1-1, 5.1.4, 6.1.1, 7-1.29 7.2.1 7.341c 7.6.1 7.7.1, 8.1.1, and the Lc.:ational Criteria for Coitinmerc:ia]. Professional designated areas (Section 12.2.3.E4, and the general dosign elements the Meta g er =ir cgr ess Connunity pJ . an Th e staff .. . a eons lodes that the he proposal :is' consistent with the appl .cebie ,w n tatewidu Goals based upon the ` following findings: 5r e 5 STAFF REPORT -� 'CPS, 89- C�5/Z089-05 CROW dDi3isGOI�d PAGE J c� a 1. Goal 1 is met 'because .t the ,, City has adopted and follows a citizen involvement program which includes review of development applications by the Neighborhood Planning organization. • In addition, all public notice rec wire ►'enta have been ':met for the "subject application. 2. Goal "t is met because the City has applied all appliiCable Statewide Planning Goals, Cita• Comprehensive Plan policies, and, immunity rw! V=7alopment Code requirements in review of the application.: 3. Goal 9 is met because the proposal would foster the City's commercial, business community thereby increasing a .onomic ! opportunities within the City. 4. Goal 10 is satisfied because, although the proposed act:on would not significantly reduce the amount, of residentially designated and in the City„ it will not affect the Tigard's p liaz- e City of �i and a corm sc . -e with OAR pn Division Metropolitan Housing for me ' £5�, Division 7 Hou ®in Rule's requirements Cha ter t for new construction mix and mi:.imvn residential density new construe ion. This is because the' six Parcels containing the single family dwellincs are presently developed and therefore ie not considered buildable land in the Com rehensive Plan. The staff concludes tLAt the pro osal is only consist ;ent with ' the majority of the applica... ?lE1 Comprehe aive Plan policies based upon the following findings e° y gy ( found .Ln Code Section 1. Polio 1.1.2, Imple�aaentation Strata 2 also 18.22.040) requires that applications of this type be consistent ° with relevant policies of. the Comprehensive Plan: .-sot have an ad., arse affect the health, safety , and welfare of the co:r+muinity$' bs P g g �, s caneistent with statewide tannin oats, aa+..� .show that here i evidence of a change in the neighborhood or a mistake or inconsistency in the Comprehensive Plan or zoning map. y, and The - applica% ae polici�ee, statewide goals, an�1 the health, sestet F y ecuesaion that follows. ®f A }. number oft h cicala changes iin the dmetz ger School P y 4 �' neighborhood, as evidenced by the commercial const°uction and accelerated commercial activity � 3y to the west rend on the immediate ` periph6ry o j ed since the adoption of the Metzger Progre s eCCommunity h Plan c in 1983. This growth in commercial developn►er!? has proceeded as envisioned in •the Plan, however' several changel from. residentia. to commercial zoning des gn. a tions were a p ro» d b y the Count y since 198 3. Although recent developaent has perhaps created a devise for rezoning among the property ' owners of the sire residential parcel®, it does not PPe ar .that e.� r g have j a fficient chap ee circumstance ave occurred to ustif y the proPasal. Since the adoption of the Metzger - Progress Community Plan and the development of the Mel g - j irculation S±ud;, few tti eb Proc?es C t STAFF FED.... RT - t.PA 119 -45 ZC89 -05 - ` -CR ORBGibN ,- PAGE 5 { LLEGIBILSTRIPJ LY 7 improvements to the area's street r iaetem have been made. .Thin issue is discussed below. ' • '• Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because property, owners were given notice of the to comment on the applicant's 'proposal. 0, 'CPO hearing 4 and surrov,Ading and an opportunity • Policy 5.1.1 is satisfied because the g tr4ditiomaa1` commercial land area added ' to ' the ''City's land , bane as a reoult of , this proposal will foster the creation of new employment' , opportunities for Tigard residents and correspondLngly boost the City's economy. y` that commercial, and industrial use�a should not Folic 5 , ,�.. 4 indicates encroach into residential neighborhoods. This proposal will result in an area zoned C -P which will abut land zoned Re-4.5 to the, north, east, and south and would regrernnt encroachment. However, in this case, there is only residential development on the north side of L Lust Street and the Metzger School property is adjacent on the east and south. As practical matter, this request will not encroach upon any existing residences,. any " significant Way because of the physical. separation prow e! ?e.. by the school property and Locust Street, The six residential properties east of 93rd Street are uniquely surrounded by commecial and institutional land uses on three aides. The dwellings have already been adversely affected by the adjacent commercial use and are somewhat isolated from the neighborhood by the schoo l property y and Y+r•,cue't; street. The redesignatirjn of tax lot 90Q and ache northeastern portion 'of lot 1002 will basicali r .f convert land whitNh, is presently' be,Lng;' used' ae a nonconforming parking lot into confc►rring commercially zionecV lazed. Other comprehensive Ilan amendment and zones change applicatiiane hav0 been approved where a prs- existi,na raie could bu identifiat to exist in the city thereby estabZ s 4 in g precedents far this cases 5. Polic� 6.1.1 is satisfied because the City's disrere3,fi stack will not be signifi' � houei?ng Y family residences. The �C�'a ancoy e y . � see Y 1 y affected b , the los;� 6f six din t b.�ilc! ng permits for single family residences at an av�e tg authorize i y 19A a e rate of apprOkig tel 2 -300 per year. loss of 4 residences occurred On ta't lot 900 Thc� and the northeastern rtion o po of tax lot 1002 when hie area was still' under Washington Coun t y j urisdiction. It is n ow committed. to a parking lot use. Policy 6.5.1 is veatisf Led Ivan future develop of the area. Site development reviraw provisions will rewire that buffering and screening be pros tided between any future comr'ercf,al CiiiiireXppment an the the existing dernces g family rest east of area to be �►2ndrx venuonated and � th stein single 9 5TATPF REPORT - CPA 89-0 /ZC69 -0 CROW OREGON - PAGE 7 • •1 . � l 1" cd Policy '7t 3.21 ry.3.1 and 1 are eatiefied becaueca.adequa a ';puisie. 'mac l.ities ,(e.g sanitary Sewer anQI water) , to'' serve 'the' Site. Any nee' development on the Lincoln Cente property or on 'the air residentially zoned properties would be required to conneot to those systems as a condition to development. ` P`ublic agencies `providing those faciiitiea will be notifiled and given the opportuni comment on any future development prc rosals on the affacted pars,:ele, thereb also satisfying policy, 8. Policy 7.2.1 must 2 be addree fled at tnil time of development 'becau +e adequate. atoms drainage falcilitiee do ,. -exist to serve : the ';site. ! The Engineering Diivieion has commente that stoma drains would need to be inztal3ed and that the installation .;could occur at :such time when SW 93rd *venue is ' extended south to SW Oak ;' Street. 9. Policy ' 8.101 lie, not satisfied because it appease unwise and untimely to allow further coaamerc devvslopnent in the area ,-.Without addressing the already tea fic congestion, circulation and *cceaw problems affecting this .!a nteiq odinood, The itngineerinq Diwieion :haw: commented that an imprpved traf�aic ciFCCu1ation plan be adopted before additional ccmm�erciai devele p�yea t '.pie allowed to ,occur. This 1j11af would them eatiei7 ` policy 8.1.1 which requiree the is 4.t. to pJ.a0 ' for a safe , and efficient street and roadway, bywtein that - sects current nee d® and antici attec'i future develo?bnent. 1 0.The applicable locationa,1 criteria for commercial development are satisfied for the following reason®: 4 a bPaci* and ucation Th� e lo:wltiostt�i' criteria •�a�tate that a commercial xsfeawional area P� away not be bordered y • resider tial p "roperti ee ot'i more than tw sides.. The affected parcels a.re , ti►djacent to other res dontialljp zoned parcels on one side to the no„ttit. This' re0i,denti dl..y zoned parcole are already ounded by caasderCiall profeeeional and Tigar4 l5chool. District iand on tine aides. The preoosed cedes gnation would' not alter. thin wituat on. Moreover, it watla restIt in a More even and Conoistent bou jar betweef t e commercial 'and institutional zones to :the south and the reeidantial properties to the north. Jigsaw puzzle- configured sowing b 1 id' n north Tgar and` in this spec;if is ®undariee a® ie snow the case i cane, results in an inadequate ]suffering, between use types and, could result in variances to buffering re uirersente. A C .eaur:. acrd wtra3 ght demarcation between the bomntercaiai and institutional aiiceae ttti the south and the seaidential pr0p4rt30e SW Yocu�►t Street might ultimately involve less land used onS y for, beiffektna and fewer variainc.ioe to the qu i , e criteiria hag' been met. se re irecaents. The refo �+3 tai ltratessional STAFF REP'oRT CPA ;t39-- 05/zc89.05 - cow.. REGON PhC8 8 ' ,b. Access d b the a licant aes�:Imea that the The traffic study submitted y Pp property which is the ,subject of ` this app1:1 :;l ition will only be. ,used for parking to accommodate a Vropo8ed 125,000 square foot ofei e building on the ' :row- Oregon PeoVarty that is - presently zoned � -P. The report indicatccs ` that thin Vvopoaal Ls necessary to provide for a preferred parking arrangement but that the office project could Proceed without the zone change- The staff agrees with the traffic study conclusion relating; to the projected amount ofi traffic wa.UU,,h will be generated by the proposed 125,000 square foot office development. However, it does not address the potential for additional traffic being generated ae a result of the rezoning. Although knot cures, sntly envisioned, farther redevelopment of the property would be possible with aubeegUeet p which been Commercial traffic im acte� w have not �sen analyzed. on both of the sites in likely to further' exacerbate the already 'strained traffic eyetem in the area The apeciftc impacts created by the proposed office building must be evaluated during; the Site Development Review process. The HetzgerProgeesn Circulation Study recommends a number Of street improvements that wc.uld ° help solve' the present traffic problems. Four projects affecting traffic circulation near thte property are: 1) The southern ex::e ) Avenue to Oak ) � Halos of 93rd (�,incoln A street 2) Improvement of Street east treat 93rd nue to SOth Avenue to full w s jar. collector street 3) lmprave Oreenbnr4 Read to five le,nee north of Locuat Street 4) Provide an add+ ti.onal northbound lane on the Oreenburg Road /.Highway 213 Olerpaes None of these projects gave been completed or fully funded However, year, on of the Locuat X11 construct a Asti Street project with the rov this ear, the 09, #,� will P j �► hal €- street improvements, mouth aid 'e oe of including sdewal.r., on the the street bettaezn Li��l.n Avenue and Hall Blvd.. around the The concern. of the staff regarding this request Canteen .�! e the traffic Venerated qu y yntem to a �aff.c enesated' ode ac of the e � ccommodat 9 Y Lure P j ... � r .. immediate pe ro . act® on undevelo ed commerci ell " -zoned ro sties in immed from aria yin �commiea-cia.l �levelo assts ae well ae fu P , y p the i j ct pairce � el be fo .r� rove�ents on_ Locuet, while et acaema:. or collector street, nece eery p is c and direct +- sane at its have` no��. lases made try address existinat t portatian issues. 'the opinion Of ntaf f that solutions r Unt be f oond, t� the toff i+c , access; con g ention, and ci rculatiun p obl e ms only, o ff ecting Locust Street, but for the entire Hall Blvd /Wa3hinOton S 4Oare.area before additional rezoning requeattll are approved. w hick ld cause wou . further: adverse traffic impacts. STAFP REPORT CPA 8 9-05/ZC8 - ikoW OREGON ?AGE v.� 1 ♦ n I With respect to the realignment of Lincoln Street (a minor collector), an area -wide traffic plan ehould adopted -prior t4 determining whether this modification to the proposed esctession, identified in they Metzger -Pikog +pis, 0L.rculatLon Study, fan appropriate. It is inadvisible to change this alignment, prior to analyzing its possible affects upon traffic circulation. e:. Site Characteristics The site characteristics criteria require that the affected cites b of a size which' can accommodate present? and projected needs and thLt the Bite have high visibility. The northeastern corner of tax loft 1002 and tax lot 900 have already been committed to a parking lot use. However, the Tigard Community Development Code does` not con ides parking lots ag a permitted use in the R -12 zone ror any of the residential zones. This area of afproximately 3250 eq. ft. is large enough to accommodate a very small ccercial' development; however, the lot eize would be nonconforming,. It is more likely that this area will continue to be used as a parking :1St or 'even an a building oetback area fc,r a larger development in c,njunction with the Lincol n Center. T!' a size of the sik residentially zoned parcels is large enough 'Z71!.,) accommodate a commercial professional development (1.47 acres). d. Impact Assessment. Without an actual detailed development proposal, it is difficult to assess whether '.'he scale of development on a property mill be compatible with adjacent umee« Both of the subject areas of this report are small enough tO prohibit some extremely large scale development and during development review it can be required that the northern property lilss of both areas be screened with tall .; ogetation or trees such that the privacy of residential properties can be mal,ntained. There acre no unique cite features of either site which could be zbnco r?atF :d into a deveio �. nt Plan. However, adjacent land uses such as the school and nearby' residential p r p res caul wells ery ed b y adequate buffer ing a nd screening- T h e site develoPment review Process can best ad dress to late d aff - (cite impacts of any commercial - gmw p� i noirie, . glare, and li s. Thee City > ie also h in tile process h of drafting new noise provisions , for commercial deve1opn nt that is to abut residential akeas 11. The Metzger - Progress Community Plan Metzger Progress C init Ple� .:onto specific The M • - ommin � y ,n contains .general and guidelines for the area bordered by SW Hall blvd. to the east and north, SW Greenburg Road to the west and 217 to the south- The plan states, that "Office Commercial Usos (now designated an ComerOia'i. Professional uses ) are planned aaainly 'at Hiil?� � B�,.vd. and Oleeon R.�►ad and along the east Side o i r ` q of �►reertburg Roam to e+,�rve both in support of and as 1 - PROS 10 SThF]F' REP�►Rr :: CPA 89" 05/7.�C89�05 �-' CROW' OREGON , � amendment tat on Staff • recom mands approval of the comprehensive p change. for the portion of tax lot 11002 fend,, all of from Medium Density Residential to Cc rcia . zoning' from R•,12 to C-P. Staff recd efsde :denies plan amendment aid ,zone change affecting ti'tho a, parcels until a revised traffic circulation, play as titian thol area. Finally, staff recommends denial of the requeast Metzger - progress ' Community plan to ally, ..fpr the real: Lincoln Street (93rd Avenue) at, "'this time. for the same reason. T;itoVED BY: Edit & Liden, S nior Planner. PA( �" »r - DESCRIPTION OF TEE PROPOSAL This is a proposal to' amerg h 4etzger•-Pr©gress Community Fan, and to change 'incre sponding zoning, for eight (9) parcels next to the Lincoln Center office project. The subject parcels are currently ,designated "Residential"; the proposed designation is "Commercial Professional". The total area affected is approximately 1.84 acres, and includes Tax Lots 700, 701, 702, 500, 501, 600, part. of 2800;' 8,000 s.f.i . of tax lot 1002, lot 900 are included as a housekeeping measure to align the current use with the current City of Tigard comprehensive plan. This submittal also proposes to modify the Metzger- Progress Community Plan to allow Lincoln Street to be modified according to the attached Exhibit A. in question have authorized application submit an pplication for a zone The owners of the grope .trammel]. Crow Company to PP change for `heir property (see attached Exhibit B) . This Comprehensive Plan and zoning This proposal will address the Com rehen P P P . issues with respect to the proposed change. A subsequent Development Review process will address the specified ecified site design issues and the relaUonsni;p of the project to existing development in the area. At this time, specific plans for the project have not been completed. However, it is anticipated that Five Lincoln Center will include approximately 100,000 feet of office space with a s a�ng le story structure. It should be noted that, althou:h the property under consideration in this proposal will enhance the development of Five Lincoln Center, it is only a portion of tit * actuvvl land needed, as indicated by accon►panying, vicinity, maps. Several adjacent parcels, also owned by the Trammell Crow Company, and designated office commercial, will also be :included in the development of this phase of he project. This proposal will also address the rerouting ' of 'Linca:r Street to show why the relocation of the street • .. V but also enhance the facilitate the construyotion of Lincoln ultimate Lincoln Street, i.e. to ev hance the traffic access from the currently Undeveloped lends south of Oak Street.` al e will address the criteria for a�iprov', The following narrative ...,.. � Change, + . and a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Chan..+ e d will show that the proposal is consistent with the applicable standards for approval. fol COM REMENSIVE FRAMEWORK Vaal A. Plan Amendment Criteria The Community Development Code provides three criteria, one of which must be , met by a proposed quasi-judicial plan amendment. In this case,, the .criteria must be reviewed both with respect to the property currently designated Residential, and with rays ect to the adjoining institutional portion. With respect to the parcels currently designated Residential (Tax Lots 500, 501, 600, 700, 701, 702), both criteria i and ii apply. i) The change is consistent with applicable " plan policies. ii) IL chance of physical• circumstances has occurred since the original, designation. Criteria i) is applicable given that the proposed changes are necessa ry to allow the continued development of alread y zoned property namely Lincoln Center. important to recognize In view of these criteria, it is, most � f function of its •s a that the suitability e� of the site .. relationship to the ' existin g Lincoln . Center tiroj ect and the other parcels currently designated Office; commercial, which will be part of Five Lincoln Center. This is particularly important, since these properties will be combined with abutting parcels currently designated Office Commercial•; that will be redeveloped for Five Lincoln Center. The land 'under consideration woad be used as parking for the proposed 100 ,000 square are foot building to be built on properly zoned land. Criteria ii) is applicable given the natural growth of the Lincoln Center developmen t . 0r • gana ll y all of th e land east of Greenbur Road was Residential . no office community known as Lincoln coln Center has grown' as a' natural result of the economic growth of the Tigard area. The ' a e a .' s Proxiffii proximity to Washington S are Highway 217 and most importantly, the critical f ice tenants has made Lincoln Center the heart of the office market for the suburbs of Portland. The change in zoning for the area has been accomplished in a piece meal fashion, p • g' t a� time. one building r d1n a criteria of n physical c rc tat' ce, There�oi ~e, the Grit a, �ra�ang+e a„ physical i e. that the area is now the, heart of office development versus the original residential nature of the area when the Residential designation vas applied is appUcable. me proposed area is one of the last coiamercially viable pieces of property remaining in the city of Tigard. . fOt Class . °f ace a ry development and the expansion of its parking lot is necessa to accommodate the building's .'construction e The. Comprehensive Framework Plan of ' °ashincitoaa County provides ,tie, following statement, to describe the character of Off icc , Commercial'. areas a 'Characterization:., The ps.:pose of this district is to e office to ho' provide for office . complex development dental p p. professional` institutional, medical , , governmental space needs in organized complexes, ranging in site and intensity from small to high rise development, 'depending on site characteristics. ' Office Commerci`!l developaents are employee intensive. Certain accessory Comm rcial uses to serve the employees of , the complex and high density residential uses may be permitted through a Planned Development process." The Lincoln Center project meets this parameter, lbased upon overall ittaster plan, character and size. The ` inclusion of the subject parcels Will allow the implementation' ' of the next phase to fully take advantage of the positive at .osphere which has been created. Plan provides the following locational criteria The .Framework p � � for Office Commercial areas o'TLocata,oin Criteria z This district may be used to buffer and residential, commercial and industrial- or commercial ' e�.�cial residential and industrial uses. The location of these uses by the Precise . should be determined process taking into account, the population and employment projections. Generally, Office, Commercial uses should be located at Collector and Arterial intersections for visibility and auto access The pedestrian transit access of p - and °' ccess also of great importance." As noted above, .Lincoln Center, as a whole, meets these criteria due to is sizea.. , proxinit to o re , Road and t Highway 217, and location a i Washington Square and Vie Metz g er residential area. the subject' p arc els r being west of the future revised extension of 'Lincoln 'Street, complied in the past to the Washington County provisions as mentioned above and will continue to comply under the 'City of Tigard Comtkercial- Professional designation. and e�,, City f T. �l Ali ch away be apps; icy as follows: ]. THE GI'. Y SHATZ ' MAIN � C1..V.ING' ,_ 3... INVOLVEMENT pROGR_A ' 1�ND S fA' TIZENS BE >>. iN"eF(� TEL . �iSS iJRE T W .L BE pROVYDED_ AN ; OPPO_ ] TY 4_.,. VED__ LA �OS SE S OF THE , P N3tN . MC ES - r; has consulted with each of Trammell Crow Company the clan a a�►d,� +ttas affected parties `involved �'�� . row Co pany`��ii3:� their support. Tram:me received PP continue to work with the affected paw `ties to insure to be provided an , opportuanz tf that ct�e��s will be .p involved in all phases of the plannring process y subject parcels in t e he ncYusion of the `'.ommercia1- Professional; area wi l , facilitate the fifth phase of Lincoln Center, thereby r einfo .sing the viability of the entire project and the bus i • One hundred plus . j oba wi l l activity in the area. � : ;......... build�.t�g. ' ac • �,, the , con�.truct Will °serve as .a work treat b When :,ompleted the building place for 350 TBE_SITI: S iii,;.. ,.. I D U t T � t. 1 ai! A$. . T4�s:LAall + ESIiEN �A �1 T H�E__D EE IpNAA? DR OR NDUSTRIAL U SES . Thy subject parcels arcels zoned residential are surrounded' er ial P�rOfessia nal on three sides by Corm► att Institutional properties. The, change in ' zoning ,p± these properties will be y consistent with th+ transitional phase the area is . experiencing, oPPORTCnNIT L+LR, SHALL PROS 15E' AN F C tT L T YVERSITI ,1)F HCi'i75�ING DEI�SITYES AND .REstrat art AltI� US P cE NT &!7EL �.T �.�- AND �� , - CONDI ' � o , ,adequate iante8�rvi:h- properties develOpinent4 and all ''k dery The development be served ny a water 's s et' having adequate water pressure fo fire protection purposes The deveiopa►ent shall, not reduce the ' water ressure in the area below a level adeq xate for dire protection/ purposes; and 'The e l iclb142 fire a is riot ! review all applications.0 I Letters of service avai .alai .it from ° the Metzger Water District': 1 [unified Sewage Agency, T'si -Met Wash: sheriff's ` Office end he ashin, Department of Land Use and . Transportation Gra f f is Impact Statement) . _ ll • necessary are currently available '' or wil" } e services, provided as determined through th <s' Developmental ". Reviews process THE CITY S }'.1 .LAN,,, A SAE _EFFICIENT STREET • � A ,.. MEETS CURRENT NEEDS AND &ND:., : ROAI�Tnl�' Y SYSTEM � -'�i�i T � � . ANTCIPAT'D FUTURE DE'fIEIA PMENT. The relationship of the "proposal; to the 'Metzger. Circulation Study, and ovarall transportation impacts is addressed below. A detailed traffic study will be completed as part of the . Development. Review, process. IV. lHIR .CONSIDERATIONS a Issues A Traffic The Metzger og' -Pr g ress Circulation Study was adopted by the Washington County Board of County Commissioners in May, 1986, as a part of the overall Metzger-Progress Community Plan which vas adopted' in 1983. The purpose, of the - Circulation Study was to . address Metzger Progress ` cul specific traffic and pedestrian problems identified during Plan adoption, including a traffic circulation• study of the Greenberg Road, Oak Street, and Highway ,217 intersection area` ams plans and policies The proposed prod cots , progr • P recomm nded in the study, as a result of an area-wide transportation survey questionnaire and, public meetings i include three major elements: * e bO �.00d 1- ;r� X.c ., mane meat projects a d designed ; to �' reduce ✓ through . traffic on, local residential ' 1 streets, improve nortb- south. auto circulation and improve traffic safety. *Access, and Capacity `im rovement arc_As 'ts a g p ` " e •ate existing traffic: alleviate . _ ... � i si ned to increased �ca acit on po�.ic� s d�.. congestion, and provide for incr P Y existing arterials and collectors; and *Pedestrian Bic' cle and Transit im r0Ve ifent pro`i eels . � p sans and 'recounendat ions designed , to provide vY able a trawl as well �', alternatives to auto as to increase the safety and conVeniencel of these alternatives." Four Neighborhood Tr af.fic Management Proj ects are i.den f ii in the study which are proposed in the vicinity of the sUbj e s �c PrQ ects traffic;ron ,:Local ' scree aprove raffle' safet eviate existxn innreased capacity Improve traffic c,a:rculatio Greenburg+ . Road, Oak . ' 'Street extendi g Lincoln Street � (9'3rd street wouti tr, ;oak Street.'''' 1 !u' ce f f itt , on ■ .Oak street ley' , improve ' Locusts greet to County ajor collector standards i etw en reeliburg Road and 80th Avenue ` and signalizing the ntersection of Locust. Street an Greenberg Road.,'!, Increase capacity on Gree lanes from ;;Washington Square '' entrance Washington '..fruuare entrance #5." Greenburg Road/Highway 217 Interchange Improvement Increase' traffic capacity an alleviate traffic p Y congestion a : the Greenberg Road / ighway 217 interchange by providing an additional northb`aund lane (restriping existing lanes or widening the Greenberg Road structure over Highway 217).n Sec�,,..1G t0 p ` k� ` the subject request, the' study recommends Lincoln a . i Avenue be rec1assif ed bets ?eein . Locus± i,Zncoln Street (9 rd rah Oak Street from a local street to a minor co ecto by rerouting, extending and improving Lincoln Street..' T] purpose of the reclassification ani extension is to redo+ through traffic on neighborhood 7tr,eets„ in add %Lisp a . increasing pedestrian and bicycle (i.e iiewa .l systems. S, FACTS. MID PINZIINGS 8asedi on field review &�•mcl..usions can be made: and the. above analysis e,. oa lowing` COWLU8ION8 i I •4 • i I • The site will generate ��cilmate'�: 1 622 Pew vehicle g a e app;r � . y e trips per day when complete. The along Greenburg Road in the area of • along Gereee e �.ntersection,.,. the Hwy 217 int.arch_ng experience . congestion and considerable delay during the existing 'pm peak hour. ▪ The site distribution indicates that this development will increase the saturation levels on Greenburg Road '! approximately three' (3) percent. This small percentage will not adversely affect the surrounding street system. The inte:7s.'mctiot of Greenburg Roar and Locust Ave meets one of the warrants` required for ,',the installation of a traffic signal and should be investig4tedin Op., future by additional wrarraht studies • The existing ramp signals on Greenburg Road and'HWy . 217 are Currently' interconnected and opervte on a 82 second cycle during l 'the .pm peak hour: • Passer 11-84 runs indicate„, tilt et by Iconneactitt the Map ieleaf intersection to the ' Hw j 217 s ign,: 1 o a Gree r burg Rod , could ,reduce the delay crtatca at the Off-ramps., ✓ 7 . © t is current? y reviewingq several lane . use changes en,.' Greenburg Road at Hwy 217' wt.ich '' shoulet help eliminate some of the congestion created at ' the l 217 of --ram s. ASSOCIATED qiRAXsPoRTATIoN G C .PLA 'LING (ATEP) NAGE 1...1 111'v. .i.Od t1 ..!V� ..111.M.!•, . t. 1Q(3'ii -50' R NEW ROW UNE OW ROW UNE =i-asure : the. safe any e estrians within the' area; Y i rovements 'are ,re^omm>mended. L existing signal at the; Green urg, 7 load n dterseo Lion remain a four (4 phase erat the proposed :93�d'�. additional. access toy' the; include)/ the rea1igrnnent aeconw oalate the proposed The existing signal at Greenbuirg Road and , Mapleleaf reviewed for interconnection` with i X3:7 traffic signals. die intersection of l�icust and Greenburg Rot d,* eery restriped Ito provide a left and right tun lane for Locust Street traffic. SS . ASSOCIATED r RAd �PORTATICR EvO1NEER/I0 & p NI�G �►�, � � r `► ...� , �E , • SOURCE: WASHINGTON COUNTY. DEPARTMENT OF' LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATIrlr41 A 1955 .d40 .1 ceowaC , eater • rG I(Ow4b •I **Co : a rl bets •. wo« Whoa! •ac.1% •f •(S To IK $O:70CC .N I(Sl t d. 1•C r.1 •M •(mot t^.Ywf• ■Sl. WASHtN rb ON ` COUNTY tstP F:T ;. D T OD 'IA:�D 'LSE AND TgANSPOgT,ATION, N. iNI t• D I S I O N.. • ,NOVEMBlik 1985 , <, a�.P�vw■r� EXISTING PRINOMAL ARTERIAL, Inpousinnuni EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL: .EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR 'EXISTING LOCAL .'STREET- 41"'"1. •,o .CHANGE TO MAJOR COLLECTOR EXISTING LOGAL STREET - C) CHANGE TO MINOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR- - CHANGE TO LOCAL STREET SST •04/0 ®•041•••• W s a0 LO two 4C1AiC y��pp�� }}��yy�f oeenuurai 6/i 9 Mu phy o nun tty, Dave irec ity of Tigard L3.125, S.W. , Hall 'Blvd. 5 ?.0. I Box 23397 igard, OR, � A •u on the Enclosed .please find. a draft 'of a- a deed. restfri�ctIo11:v , "ic : p closing and purchae' of tax lots 35AB700, •35AB50'0,. 3 5'AB701, 35AB501, 35A3702, and 35AB600, will be voluntarily placed Iupon deed of the properties. This deed `restriction will insure 'that the { property shall be used only for parking.i` The effect of the deer restriction will be . a reduction 'of the ;potential traffic 'volume. versus if the property is left as residelAtial and the ' arkin for 'Lincoln Center Fire is self-contained ,, on ?te , property ? that is currently zoned Commercial - Professional:. I trust that this assurance will' �*.'4igate any' Concerns 'bout .tile effects on the local t rafr' Pyvteas beraUs ere will be n decreasut in traffic if '� zone change-is a de �iti the dee restriction •et Thank you for your assistance.. Sincerely, TRAIMiELL CROW COMPANY David C. Blake Partner DCB /ac Enc1 cures „ i y a�%�np..rr- ai�v7 GiV V�u►i..a» +�r., WHEREAS ?'ranndell ; Crow ,prop ; Coa er �Popey! ' opa n sfi crib, e, ere 'E, AS Owner wishes to use, the. Property for F ar in. y aiso owtne b xrO�ndie and se ,toe 'add scent :proper Y W ERA: ` d "Cityr� has agreed 'to :al lt�w Wye � G��.ty� � of. �� Tiger ( d of e Property .upon certain 'con dtion. �; '1 ' NOW THER1 FORE a t is agreed as fcal Owner agrees to Z nL3-t use of tie ��ropea y z� �� ••� r un'+.�i 1 such. tim .as a.. other ,support of OwneY�! sdj scent ;property the ' Prop:art including property �� bordering an r. ..p ropert� bordering � 3C�. ,road, street, --(r highway.. separating the , ;Property from A 43 property, is . z ned for commercia . or ' other non - resident .al . °usTe s w E until. such time as City .inaay otherwise specif ca .ly permi or of Property, whichever occurs first the ��ahs rst� ,' , Y.... -.. .�,�..... �.. i pr i nd,) on P ease find enclosed copy ,ef f he " °�" reenent .bet Teen ;tie Tig School. District and Tra a. e l -C o Com ny, confir,�an ng the` sc�hoe ciupport of the Tigard Co!apreh - , en�31 „��e' „ rP�L�n ChaIZ3�, information. If you have any 'questions ':do ; aot hesi Sincerely, TRAMMELL CROW COMPAN David ` C. Blake Partner `GCB /ac Enclosure 11 %,,GritEEFIENT BETWEE TXG 'R MMELL .0 March SCH a4 •T r ,t Trammell'' Croat Company is ;currently' Ln the process. 'of' requesting a change. ,. in the City, of Tigard . Comprehens ve Plan to ,change the location of Lincoln Street. ' The pr iposed 'Lincoln Street 3,s shown on the attached Echibit A. Trammel'1. Crow Company ia also attemrcing t to;hange,i' the Tigard comprehensive Plan to allow the construct mrn of ;a parking lot' on e land �ir iediate :y to tip ues` of the 'relza.atec:' Lincoln Street. T'ramiuell Crow Company hereby agrees 'tiat i the Comprehensive .Plan is changed 'to ailo�t the' use apro osed constructed, Trammel Crow and the w park ng,: of :is use of the 'parking lcit to Metzger School. Trammell crow Company agrees ,to S,iixclude in the specifications for the ro P osed Lincoln street et se., .rnty fence' A1Q nq the., .,entire length' o f the Lincoln Street exposure to Xetzgelt TE, e , shall be included as a cast of the street :nproveinent , and shall be included in : the Local Improvement District: 1`.hat: w li be for ed the construction of the road:, Tigard School Board hereby supports, wittho lt obligating itself any financial responsibility, the necessary change in .the the. Tigard to 3n �rinar�cs.a . ,, . Comprehensive Plan that ., would allow the relocation of Lincoln Street and the use of the property west' of Lincoln Street as a parking lot. 4 Accepted y Agreed and Acre tech this day of March, 1989- David C. ; Blake r. uss a'oki artner Trammell Crow Company uperi igard 4 endent School District If 'ir Ed Murphy city .of , ' Ti gard'. 13125 SVE .Hall .„Blvd.' P ,O. Box' 23397 Tigard, Oregon 972 Dear Mr. Murphy: This letter is my authorization for t2:e'� Tra mael Crow Can' pan to submit an appl,icahior; for a zone ,change on my property from residential to Professional Commercial.' Location: 10175 S. 2nd .Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Murphy Tigard SW Hall Blvd. 0. Box .:23397. igardo Ox gon 972; ,Dear r rr Vetter is my au '.boriz atio n for ` e ra ime1l C cw ' Coatpan submit an application for a ..zone change oa my. p�ropert from, residential to` profess ional _,commercial. Very inu le ; ;letter is :my ,au "for o S ►mi,t , r/ a, 1,7a tiirt for a otne: room , resideliti.al to pre Fecsefal co l tier is my 'aut on �atiion fort ' Trai une1 to submits .app1iCAtti::n for ' a zone from re Zential to professional commercial cu v -ryauc , . OBERT" '& EL24A, MARTIL 119 SW TAYLORS FERRY RI )RTLAND, OR 97223 BRUCE MILLER, ROBERT ',MATHESON, DIANE BAKER 9495 SW ',LOCUST ST '‘ * PORTLAND, OR 97223- dfOYCE":. HARBROUG. 0- sW 92ND RTLAN 1%XY.41 t: IIERBSTER, DEAN,' IWEBEII: 175, 511 LOCUST rsT, • 'Ojr04b:); OR 97213 • RICHARD BOGI.11%iIL, JAMES BAR MtRK & MARY VANDER YACHT 9445 SW LOCUST ST fl,?125 SW LOCUST T PORTLAND, OR 97223 4k/GARD, OR 9722,3 5000 ISI 35/k.1:s 400, 100 2(1104 2901* WASHINGTON CIACKr4AS o15UZ‘TTY G.D. 1.1AUAIER SCHOOL DIST. 43J 2517 QUEBEC , 13137 SW PACIFIC, HWY' , EUGENE, OR 97401 TIGARD, Olt '47223 HARRY '&1. 13EVERIalt LOOS , ','' ' :, , RICHARD & cpTrir.g It0iDOE$tt. 9365 stir' tite,IItT,, ,61, , ',' , - ' .i,,,, ,9].46.,', SW ti()CUSI, TIGI, A\. F D ,. ., ot,, , 07 2 21 , ,•, . • ,', , TIGARD, OR pt 90 21 ,,' , ', . ,,. . . • ...'; '' , . :,,: 0 0W—OREGON, INC. 10260 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD, OR 97223 203 13RIAN &'ICATHY,' pRAZ.I'GEP;, ° I 9120 SW, LOCUST TIGAiRD, OR 91223 , MAIORY HAGLUND i•IARVIN, & MARjORIE TiigoNggs '‘soo 10025 SW 92ND AVE 11075 SW 1HALL BLVD , . ' t•Oivrr.ilmiD, og, 97223 , 1, , , , , — DORIS Kiattl4Piiii, TIGARD, OR 97223 0220 SW LOCUST ..,' CROW- PZEiCER-,110SrORD #117 BY TRAMMELL CROW C POBOX 5396 ,''PoR11.141BD, OR 97,228 J :5... MAY 2, 1j69 TIGARD CITY HALL TOWN HALL TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION 13125 SSW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON 1+'bt,Ts 1. Gener ..1 I f rmaton CASE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE cNANOF CPA 09- 05/4O 09 -05 E3EQU8ST: For apronal, of a 4ompreh 0naive VlAn I 0064, 0t snd Zoos) Chang® �±en ®it, request to change the comprehensive plan daatg a i char am Loci Y Residential to ProfeesiOna Coemereial and ge the zuDing designation from R-4. 5• (Single Famil Reeidantial, 4 5 unite acre) to C -P (Commercial Profeeeiona1) for 6 parcels totalingF., 6 for a comprehensive plan amendment to change tax lot 900. and the northeastern poi ti.on of tax lot 1002 (about . 74 a�cree) from a ,Medium ,Density Residential deaignation to a Commercial Profeaaional'designation and to change the zoning on it , from R-12 to 0-P. Finally, an aimendanent has been, requested to the Metz er Progress 0o0nuniLY Plan n to revieo the alignment of Lincoln Street (93rd Avenue). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: L=ow peneitY Residential Medium Denai.y Residential g?NING TESIGhATIOHs R" (single tly dential, 4.5 unite per acre) and 8712 (Medium D en ity ieefdenial, 12 u nits /acre) APPLICANT: ICANT: Crow Oregon, Inc. 10260 SW Greenburg Road Tigard, OR 97223 ra� : several' (see attached exhibit) LOCATION: 9220, 9260, 9330 SW Locust Street; 10175 SW 92nd Street; 4225, 9255 SW Mapleleaf Street (WCTM 1S1 35AB, tax lots 700, 701, 702, 500, 501, 600, 900, and parts of dIMMIlimad 1002) 2. Background information The subject properties were annexed to the City of Tigard in late April, i e applications (Comp= he aiVe 1987. Prior to the annexation, two land ue ehen Plan Amendment✓, Special Use Permit) were filed with �iaehirngtof .aunty. Al°o L it was agreed at y and Countti that alt . the Oft that time r,�ween th �e, even if' the final applications in proceed at the 0ount" would cb ntin �deceion occixrted after annexation: STAFF REPORT -� CFA 89 L 05/Z�8�9 -Q►5 - CR OW OREGON PAGE CII -./ t /• tu A . Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Bone Change (Case No.. 87- 73 °,M) to change, the land use designation fro R -5 (Residential, ,5., units /acre) and Institutional to . 0-C (Office Coa ercial) on parcels located:' immediately north of Oak Street and'we®t of Lincoln; Street extension was approved by the Board of [ Commissioners on May 19, 1987, A special Use Permit for a parking lot (Case Ho.,., 87- 122 -S0) Was granted by the county on May 13, 1987, for four re sidentially zoned parcels located at the southwest corner of Locust Street and Lincoln Street. The rerido aces on these properties were removed and a parking araa was developed.' The conditions of approval unposed by the , county remain in °f feat. Also, since this property has b9en' annexed an!l 1:he City does not allow commercial parking lots in residential zoned. thi a portion of the Lincoln Center parking lot 3.,e a nonconforming use. On May 18, 1987, the Tigard City : Council approved the resoaing of the . annexed area in Metagec from 'Washington ` County designations to City debignationC which most closely resembled the County zones. This ordinance (Vo. 87 -22) became effective on Jens 18, 1987. subsequent review!,'; utilized the City Community Development Code rather than the County k�egulatione. A Site Development Reviol., (SDR 87-08 and V 87 =07) was conducted by City staff in June, 1987 for an approval to construct a 12 -story office building. It was approved subject to 16 conditions. FP � In June of 1988, the Hearings. City of Tigard approved -a Conditional Use permit re est to callowrthe construction n of a rooftop heliport atop the newly constructed Lincoln Tower office building.zaie application was approved subject to 13 conditions. In March, 1989, the Dir ctor's' dasignee approved with conditions a request for several lot line adjustmente and a minor land partition g w tax lot at the southweetern corner of the Lincoln Center property M 8 C p. pe y ( 9.06/NLP89 -�, 5) . 3. Vicinity Informat . qn Please refer to the zoning map, attached to this report .as "Exhibit B 4. Site Information` is o + P Pe 'Y � presently developed Office The Linr.,olitz Genter ro floor area a rt 9 g rea of ap roximately 53 PP y 0 000 e�aar� feet buildings with a rose' f1 P ` fee, total of . Tax lot 900 lies at the northeastern corner of the property and is currently zoned R -1 and two Parking structures on a tot R-12 (Me, . Density Residential, 12 unite y , Per acre). Immediately north of it portion ., area Parcels 'are is a of tax lot 1002 which �.e ' also zoned R,-.12. Both p immediately west of Lincoln Street and the combined area . o_ ; tax lot 900 STAFF REPORT _ CPA t10'..05/ ZC80°05 - CROW OREGON PAGE is I P1`:' '4 .. • _ »� . M lc 4'+ n tt and the .portion' of tax lot 1002 ( approxiiapat(ly 3250 eq." fib: to be . redees gnated as C -P (; eisni`al -.Prc4eeeional) The applicant also propoeee to hchangie the c,oaprehenaive� designation of ,< sixl, residential pa�rce 'l* `approximately • immediate' y to the east off . Lincoln Center,;,, coneieting c ,,w bordered by SW Lacuet Street to :the north ,' SW g2nr "ofl!:� MaPl eleaf to the Booth and Sid 'Lincoln Stre#-P,''',',, o the -a.5 parcels are all currently zoned and deveX op►ed i .as, Single Residential, 4-5 units per acr- ) . The applicant state® that these (lhanges are A'needed eo' that a e ro; C` zeaird acresi e 'b3 to the , eas\t, Wept.. These‘ ,,1 mow •Deneit 't 125/000 square l foot office building,'' called Lincoln. center Five, can cc Aatructed " at the northeaster 5'. porti,In Of ' the ; Lincoln, Center 1.,roPe rt;� and meet City of Tigard Coa munit2 Dew slap !tent Code r equiremente for sufficient mber of on -vita parking �v+ace ®. It is anticipated that a., icieent , two -story parking. structure will be con:atructe�?' ._can the land bo leLedl' by SW Locust, Lincoln, Maploleaf rind .92nd Ar +ties. Finally, the applic#,; -tt is requeatii g an arm ,*�c nt to ' the .. Metzger community Paean so that the location of Lincoln street can be Changed eo: that it would be aligned with 92n4 Avenue at Locus. Stroet. 5. m TrZPQ compents The State of Oregon Highway Division e comments that although the Tr eel Crow proposal addressee project 2 of the <$ctzger /Progress Circulation Study ii SW Lincoln Street /93rd Av enue Proposed extension south) , there are other traffic problems? i.ei. congestion, that the change in 'toning will add to. The Division suggests that Washington county have, the opportunity to comment on the impacts (of this proposal) on giii oreenburg iznad and Locust streets- _ The W irrgiton County aepartm®nt of Land gee.., and ranaporta idr has reviewed the propoUal and has n0'. objections'to it. School, District 23J has ryd ieed the ro .�sa� no ©b ect�,on to and j it Staff "notes that an agreement has t e c Ti eb...Te� rean m mse ii :g . nCerd o r bCy oT i. gthahrse de uDsce 9nO� h rchte0000heolxe l district and Trammel w wk ch a horizee the to patki#4 structure duriu evenin g to construct y fenca gt Street ettpo©ure to Metzger Schoolt the, Hoard supports in principle this comprehenVive plan aflendmer'nt aria tans change and the relocation of Xi ncoln Street'. Neighborhood Planning organization 8 .040 reviewed th proponal ,and hag. no objections to it. aial a�xid has the The •''l`ity Enginee ring OiviejOh' has ice he propo 9 �tie:wed t ofralloting comteiate e STA. F REI Ci.: �+ b RT - - CPA 89- 05 /ZrCa9 CROW oREGDN PAGE T 3 .1 a� The primary traf f is access `' to thin •ite J. via, •Greenberg; Road. Greenburg Road in ' this viCinity `i�I experienoing auubatantiah ;traffic aongeation. It is unl kely' that' the °traffic: ' conije Lion „ii this., vicinity trill be resolved merely .,by adding t,xaff c 1a4eo'::; ad. ,.oignale.. Instead, it �� .11 li ly; Ivry :-�;:ce.eary' to' prom s nvw 's'oadwaye` or revelee the alignment of Eating # xoadwai a to provide , .adequate.' capacity between' Highway 23,7° anti the camaera��la1 '.delopm©nta ar:onrg ; Greenberg Road. b , There currently exietei .in this, vicinity substantial : prA rty with C. . and 0-G zoetivaY and HPPtect1 for erabetantiaa ,;' developv ent or redevelopenerit. Development of redevelopment '4 . oaf thee ° eki atiritg, C•-P and C-G propertie© could eubsta tia11y, increase =° th® ee�miaaidg on Greenburg 'Road near highway 1 7 : Ae mentiondbd aboe, thti L street improvements typically required ae . conditions .of' devm344mint may not, he • adequate 'to 'provide'. the additii na1 caffic capacity rteeded for full 'development ` under the existing a. The C-P ,,zone. provides the potential for (development with meuch higher traffic demands than tha( existing R 4.5 zoning. d. Cu rrenti -P zoned properties between. Oik Street and Highway' 2i7 �� have very, poor access to Greenburg'' Road and Highway 217. Due to conflicts with the nearby freeway, rampe, traffic . exitcinq from Oak Street is prohibited from turning left (south),' onto Greenberg Road.' Therefore, traffic friar the C7P .properties has no legal acceea to Highway 217 except by driving through the ' adjoining . residential 'streets. The Metzger - Progress Circulation Plan adopted by Wrz- lhington County in 1986 , propcsee, to 'provide a new access front Oak Ctreet tc • Greenberg Road b`S eFtsading 93rd Avenue south from Locust Street 'to Oak Street. TrE fie from Oak. Street could then reach the freeway by g 3rd, west on Locust Street, an hen south on driving north off► 9y d t Greenburg Robd. This would' still require the Oak Street traffic to go approximately a avoid cluarte r ` of a mile out Of � direction' in order to avoid making the illegal left turn from Oak Street onto Grecnburg Road. The apiicant proposes, to realign '93rd Avenue, moving Ltd . with Locust Street further east. The- proposed, intersection wi realignment would increase the out of direction travel for t traffic attempting to reach Highway 217 via Greenberg Road. e. It appears that any zone change from' low density residential to ;erc.a1 would further inorea existing is gt - robieme. comoan traffic p ar© that under the exieti.ng planter it . could t further apps turmlikely the the usual conditions of development ;ori, such pr pe y, id adequatn1y address the traf f f c problems herefole..: the City. Enaineer '' recommends that .:the :zone change be : denied at .this tune. It appears that the proposed realign inept of '93rd Avenue ,would further increase the difficulty of acceea between the Oak Streket properties y . ` - 17. The likely result Wuld the atirre�nt3: zoned C P and Highway 2„ g the Street. increased traffic through the residential areas- of ' Oak S STAFF REPORT +- CPA 89- 05/Zc89 -05 - CRow OREGON - PAGE 4 Therefors . the ft Bnaineet ratcommende that the p o ova ndmont o the Met2cter- Proareas Circti? at .on Stud la+� denied. at this time g. The proposed new alignment of 93rd' . 'Avenue does, not inlet City standards, as the ' curve radii are t oa short . If Ali'`. •new ` alignment is approved, it should mi. ' required . to comply with exIsting City design standards for 'a minor collrCtor street. h. Additional Engineering and Planning review • is required to resolve the traffic problems of th ��► area which are inherent fan the exii ting street layout. Such a rev ew ehbUld Hgo through • the normal comprehensive planning pcocees and Could, likely result in adoption -of revisions to the existing •traffic 'circulation plan. As a part of such review, the potential. for additional ' zoning and potential street realignment .could be investigated. `A possible joi�:nt funding of such a study has been d„',.ecussed with r a jar property owners in the'., area; however, to date, such a review 440 ncct been initiated. i.'The existing, sanitary sewer system in 'Locu;et and Iapleleaf Streets ppe equ commodat p po ed cone change. c s the ray e a ars to �e ad at® to a. There is currently no storm drain age systvtm to serve the proposed zone change area, except fear minor roadside ditches. If the site redeveloped, •it will be necessary to provide an adequate storm drain system extending to Aeh Creek. It is likely that' the storm dram wo"Tad be installed in conjunction with the extension land improvement of '','3rd Avei7,120. necomme ndatlon _af Lnaiineec na piv siorae 1. Deny the request for Comprehensive Plan /lone Chaitige until an adequate traf2Lc plan $.s developed to address increasing traffic problem -1. 2. Deny the request for a revision to the proposed alignment of 93r? Avenue (Lincoln Street) until a plan has a beech identified to provide better access between the Oak Street C -P pr*Derties and Highway 217. Wo ether comments were received. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS this case Planning Goals 1, . 2 Q . The relevant criteria in th ar � Sta��E wide Y�l 9 and 10 and City of Tigard Coompxe;enaive Plan policies 1.1.2 Implementation Stria �egy 2: 2 -8.1.1 5.1.1: and the 5.1.4, 6.1.1, 6C� criteria 1.1.2, for 7.2.1, 7. . , 7 7.7-1. , commercial Professional designated areas (Section 1212i,3.3),, and the general design elements of the Metzger - Progress Community Plari. The staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with t e a �� plb3.$'cable statewide Goals based upon the following finding n,, STAFF REPORT - CPA S9,-05/2089,-05 -- 'CROW QREGON �» PAGE S Ix i. Goal 1 is t abecauee , r has adopted rind';. followsa citiaen' • involveMent grogram, which includes re`riew` of development app] icationa by the. Neighborhood. *lanning. Organizat on�. _n addition all public notice requsaceraente have. bOes: raft for the subject application: • o Goal 2 is met, because the City has `gapplied all app1ic1b1e Statewide,, planning Goals, City Ccimprehoneiver 'klan policies; ark.' Ccaiunity. Development Code re it ems to i ga n r vierw of', the a p1 .Catiorce .. ,,e0a1 0 ie met because the ' proposal would for+tgir thah City • s cariaercial bu®ineeo coarSaunity thereby increasing economic rogportunit lee within the City because,' alth • ough ` the : r 4. Coal 10 i® eat�sf esl b� p oposed act9.orr would 'not icanti tiall ,. desi' at n �gnif y radyce 'the, amount of � resides y gn ed� land• i the City,, it will not affect 'the •City of ' H Tigard••a Compliance with OAR ehapther 060, niviaion 7 the .Metropolitan' Hou ing R01e''a . reellaremsant® for ' :new construction mix ' and minimum re�ridentiab. density • for new construct i:,uz Thia is because thw�''ia parcels Containing` the single family dwellings are, reseentiy developed and therefore is'„," not; considered buildable land, in th■:: Com p rehenai ve g lan. The staff, concludes #chat the proposal is only consistent with the majority of tY,e appl; cthle Ccmpreheneiae Plan policies based upon the following? findings: • Policy` 1.1.2, =mplfsmentation Strategy 2 ' (aleo "found in Cade • Section 18.22.040) r. ,.;tee that applications of this tyioe ' be consistent with relevant policies of thso Compreaeneive • Plan; not hate,. an adverse affect the health, safety o and welfare of the conityp be coneiateilrt with etatew• de ' that there evideh zoe of a change in the neighborhood d a miratake or inconsiat `envy it the COttpreheneive ' P1tur •or coning sap," '; The appilt.cable peril "dies, Btatawide g6a1E, and the health, 'safer , and y 'eeeed y wo�.fare of the commuz3it are adds the discuesign that f� 3owe. A. number of physical chant es in the Metz er Schoi�l neighborhood, an evidenced by the co X reial conetructfon ; ;at,1d accelerated commercial activity i msdiately to the Meet a►nd 'cn the perilphery of the subject area, halve occurred r�ince to aciopiton of ite the Metzger- Progress Community Plan in 1983. This growth ever • ®e ra F .. the cormerc ial develo ent has roceeded a® how ve 1 chap ei,, from �., eidentialn 'to i co rc . this g . ' � pprov� tare Count snEe, ornane - ial�lzon�ng , deal nat ions were a' y ogh ,, a� b Y ., g thci q property. � rs of the six re�sid+ent deli rezoning' among sae perhaps created a re for �' ial rcele sedan - �welo nt � e the own pa '" not da►E2l3 'n � - - appazr that sufficient. �hai�ges d�.rcivaetanoe..$yha•:e, occurreai�^ta juetify, the pkopoeal . . r Sihce the adoption of the Metz er- Progreee Cbmmunit de's elo: � anent of the Metzger-Progress n Plen , ' Circ�tlat�.oh Study, sTApp AID: PAC �POiaT � CPA 89- 05/ZC89+ -05 - CRl?W OREGON mprovements to three ,area's street .sYsteli 'Ipave been�r made. Tihe:.iesue in discuaae' below. . Poll 2.1.1 is satisfied because I�PO �S cy� � , . � ,y #4 d �eurr0wading property owners were girpsnn notice of : the haring and 'an oppai�-tuU` 'lty t* coanalent on the applicant's .pr r ona1. ti . Policy' 5.1.1 is satisfied :because the addition it ca inercial ]and . area added to, ithe City's land, base ae a result of this: propoea1k will fotater the creation oil new ; employment `: 'oppo�rtunitiee for 'Tigard residents and correspondingly boost the city' e aeonomy. . Policy 5.1.4 i ndfcatas t,iat commercial" and induatriel ur�ee' rahau1d not encroach into residential; neighborhoods. This ,,proposal will result in. an are zoned C- P which c it l abut land zoned R-r4. S' to the north, east, and er,uth and would represent encrOachasant;t Howaver, in tbia ca ®e, ; there le only Tee dentia1 developaaent ©n tae north side �f Locust Street ends the Metzger School property ; ie adjaga nt ern the nest µ' and south. Ae praotica:. matter, this' request:' wi11 not, encroach► upon any existing residences i.n any significant way because o tha physical separation ` provided,' by the school propartg• end Tgetaet Street. The 'Six residential properties aaot of 93rd 'Street are uniquely surroranded by wean eraial anal institutional land uses on three sides. The, dwellings have already men advert ely affected i try the adjacent commercial nee and are eomewhab isolated from the neighborhood by tka school proparty . and Locust- 53tre+et T ha redesignation of tax lot 900 and the .northeastern Portion of lot. 1002 will basically convert land which is presently being used as a nonconforming plzrktng lot into conforming cowmercialiy zoned land.' Other aomprehansive plain amencanti and zone change applications, have been approved where a pre- existing ueei could be identified to exist in the City thereby eatAb1iehing precedents for this case. • Policy 6.1.1' is satisfied tie, Ruse tha City ^s diversified housing stock 11110t. be aign1f icantly of fected by the : loee of six ' single family residences. The City co nt nuee , to' authorize buildieg pera�►ite for single family resid0000s at an a,.,era a rate of g, approxiuhately 200 -300 per year; The lose of 4 'residences OCCU �ced' on tax lest 900 Rind the. not .. pertLon of tax tot I.dt2 when' ' ea Baas still under heastern ttnie ar Washington 0Onntio. jN.»riedietioia. It i.s now .committed to a p�rkig' lot use., • Policy 6.6.1 is Oatsaied upon future development of the area. Site A. p p l require that buffering and awelo meat re. � Provided bat een ® wil, dcreening be prov � � _ � lopcaent ' an iet 9 any commercial deve the e ex th .. utu>, ins single family reeiideances e area to be redesignated and the east of sw 92nd Avenue. STAFF AtA'PORT CP e9 O5 /z. 89 -b5 cccO oI sG ©N - PAGE'7 a Cro $olicy ' 9,1.2, 4 le►atteief fed k because ` adequate " Y gasa'litfe® , Vie. g as iitary ' 0ewer and, "ar) exist " to i servra th,� «; its Tiny `::new 'development on the incoli wCeiater ` 1►roparty o ion' ,'ha` ;eia reeidenti'a3,ly zoned propert ee woul ' s , r.qui red `'ta t oonn t t©" titce� pCdin syst�sme�� as `a , cond�tna to developaa0nt. r kagncieo theve faailiti�es: will, of not f .ed` , rind gi i ' ,the' opportun .t' t( omment, pan , aany ;future devil pment propoeale ; oa +the afficted 'parealn a thereby also satisfying poll. e;y, Pol icy 7.2.1. must tie addressed at they ' t� of d vslapu t to serve, the, adex�uate storm drainage fac3.jiatf�ss ,,de not ,ex s The Engineering Division has ,,cc mented that ,' atom. drains foul to be installed and that the } °,insta lation could ,o'ccur ,at nuc when 3P 93rd. Avenue ie r extended aouth to SW :oak `airsat.. PoLI cy '8.14.1. ie not satisfies cause it 'appear. unwise`' and untimely to alb. ow further coaVairc ai. deireZop sit " t,thd reaa without. aeddlresSing lati oa and g 9 .access prArileme afgeetin thi® nei ?0orhood.. ,,Thi; Erigneerinql bive iAn has counted 'that ark improved traffic, cisrculatioin plan'` adapter. before addition t cot nercia develi nt i allowed ' to occur +. Tb s; plan ' would than az�tieiy policy 8.1.1 Which r.quirei the City to. 'plan. for a safe, and 'o f iciest ' street and,.` roadway system that ubeets current needs and a anticipated future! iteVelo ...nt. ' 10.The applicable iooational criteria ` 2oit` Colnmeroial Ptofessiona development ales' satisfied frig the fallowing `e ®one a. Spacing and Locatic•)n The 1, iteria state that a commercial- .,.rofeeiional area locatioxla cr P way not be bordered by residential properties can . more 1tha°,a' two aide+. The affected parcels are adjacent -to', other real lent ally %' Toned arca�1a one side only to the eft b� 'a fan y ' . p .... reeid�ntiaZly Z�iia d pare ®le are ahead eu�rara��d y , , omaerc�,a professional and uigard Sch►1 District land oar `thz,®e, .. sides. The , proposed redesll,gnation. *� ould rot alter , his ,.situation. ,.l ores er, .tt would result in a more eveh and caneiBterit oous',dary, x..'°!t een' the comerciai find institutional zones to; the. south 'and t e.. residential, r �. h propertied to the north. Jigsaw puzsle= aonfqured mooning boundaries, e + .,, , � , .. Tigard .. u e�t �haisand crou�.d ca ge resulteein asp inadequate buffer nh between us' ,:ype , redult in variances to buffering requ remonta..A clear and straight dezralccation bst,aeen the sommercia;t ,and. f etitutional areas ;to the.. ;: eolith and the residential proPertiee .oin the noirtih side, o &W Locus street Might Yuffertn and fewer variance to these re c,uirem$nte. Thereforra' g Criteria had been m ©t. STAFF REPORT - CPA 89- 05/ZC89 -;05 Crow onE Ni PAGES 8 ... ...... . . ..� .... .i.- ..,�.. A .�. ��y . +i ..r °...I I 1 w P�- .,a w -J . Access The .traffic fic stud y ,submitted t' lf cant assumes at tb e property which is the subject- of . this application .rill only be used. for parking to accommodate a ' proposed 125, 000. square' foot, office, bs,ilding on the Crow- Oregon ' property 'that. is *presently zoned C,-P. The report indicates that this 'Proposal ' is nee esary ‘ to pravi she fore, a preferred pa; :ta arrangement but that the oa'`f',ice ' Project' could proceed without 'the zone change. The staff agrees reed with the «� ; traffic study conclusion ;elating to the projected amount of trolftc which wAll be 'generated by the proposed 125,000 square foot o�°'1cd dc-: ialopment. However, it does not address the potential for additio,:',l traffic being generated as , a result Although, 111,,t currently envisioned, ` further m ring 9 redevelopment of the property 1 would : be possible with ssubeequant traffic impacts which have not been ,, analyzed. Coaas>sArcial development on both of the sites ie 'likely to' further ,'sxac6rhata the already strained traffic system in the area. The specific imp::lirts created by the 'proposed office building must be evaluated '. during the Site Development Review process. The Metzger- Progress Circulation Studyr,recommends :a number of_ street improvements that would helP1 solve the present traffic ;probZ*Ilo. Four projects affecting traffic circulation near this property arses 1) The southern extension of 93rd 'Linc©ln) Avenue to Oak Street 2) Improveaent of Locust Street east of 93rd Avenue' to 80th Avenue t0 full ma j or collector stree t standards mP g north of Locust $tre__ 3) Improve t�,cea�nbur .Road to .:five lanes et '8 44) Provide an ,eddttional northbound la ,0 on the Greei biur'g Road /Highway 217 overpass Ao ne of the9 ro jests have been Completed or fully fundad. however, this ysr, the C /ity will construct a portion of the Locust Street i�.�zwalk th thti provision , of half- street improvimuen'ts, Street w . including ro dz w , on the south side of the 'street between Lincoln Avenue and Hall Blvd.. g , tit is request centers around the Tha concern of the staff re ardinr to ate ,the tra# 4u y Y fic generated ads ac of the street s stem to acccrlkrtioc from existing' commercial developments ae future: p j aOxta o n undeveloped, commercia2.ly zoned properties a .u, he mmediate vicinity. While access to the sub jest parcels t:an be found` directly on L,cust street, la major collector Street, necessary improvements, have not been made to address ex at, n� transportation issues. it, the opinion of staff that solution® must be, found to the traffic. access, congestion, and circulation problean a not only affecting bocust street, but ` fore the entire Hall S,p�• rd. /W,. ahington Squat: area► before .additional rezoning' request are approved which would cause further adverse tr iffic' impact ®'.' STAPP RlPORT - (WA 89- 05/ZC89 -05 CROW OREGON �- PAGE 9 Wit h xe ®pelt to the , 'realignment of •.L4ncoln, street,. or collector), rare, area -wide traffic 'plan ehoi►1d ' be adopted prior to determining whether' this' 'modification to the Proposed' extension, identified in l the Metzger- Progces$ Circulation ap)ropriate. It Le inadvieible to change this aigrament ,prior . to analyzing , 'affects `upon traffic'.circulation. c. 'Site Characteristics, �. 9 affected tits ebe The site characteristics criteria require that tA�, a.f of a ,size ,which caan accommodate present and pro jecl ed needs and ,that l4ia site have high' visibility. The northeastern corner of tax lot 100:' ,and tax lot 900 have alreasdy been, comitted to a parking lot use. However, the Tigard VAmsminity Development ` Code do.. not consider parking lots as ,a ,'permitted use in the R •12 Zone or any of ," the a-'enidential approximately, 4 zones,. This ',area of a rox�natel 3250 s ft. is large enough to accodm odate a very small commercial : development; however, the lot Eize wn:4ld be nonconforming.. It is more likely that this area will continue to be used as a parking lot or even ae a Wilding setback area for a 1aT'ger development in ,conjunction with the Lincoln Centel . The size off! the site rsa Eidentiall y toned parcels is large enoug3 to accommodate a commercial professional development CI" `, I _ ;acres r,Fk 6. impact Assessment Without an actual detailed development proposal, it is,:diff.tcu:t to . access whether the scale of development on a property will be compatible with adjacent 1188 6. Roth of the subject _areas of this report are small. enough to prohibit some extremely' large scale development and during development review it can be required that the northern property 'lines of both areas be screened with tall vegetation or trees such that �e privacy of r e a3dattial properties, c an be maintained. There are no unique site features of either site which could be incorporated into a development p3irn. However, adjacent land uses► such as the school' and nearby teeidential properties could be well served by •Idequate buffering and Screening. The site development review procela can test these relatcld - pm � Off: site impacts of any commercial-development on h 'parcels ,such ae noise, glare, g The City is al development tsw+�t is ��f re, and lihte, jf drafting new noise provisions for commercial e r,,ce a abut residential areas. .. The Netz g er-Pro g reams Communit y Plan f9 The Metzger Progress ea horde ed b SS�al�ah blvd. s �gsn/ ral g ' for the area � specific .,,tdeline® _ - by the seat and north, an SW the west and Highway 217 to plan to .1 g y south.:. The lan 5�1 �:�: � enburgm Road states that ..,Off Commercial . Dace (n :,mated as con rc Lad .. al yes ,i are planned mainl at Hall Blvd: and Oleeon Ro€�d, and Profession t ) p 3m' g the g .. _. Road to serve both in support rt of and as Greenbur Ro P® aloe th6 east side of � STAFF REPORT ^CPA 89- 45/ZC8S}05 CROW ORECO ' PAGE 10 t_. r aSHINGT ®N1 I CRESCENT ,sOVE � 4LL. 1 I 1= = CEMETA�RY_ _ et 11 11 iv tu ft 1 J 1 to 1 c d li LEMON SHADY L BLVD: OP1k(QTi4 J Jack 13chwabi l Attorney, 9V41 SW Tigax' Street', repteeent ;i ig ; da a .Share'/i have purchase and dosigne4 a "'.haea .for the rifer, w iLd i'. caso to Eenchvie* Terrace, They fees tliii ie ',a viab] a alternaiikivu an wit min ise the ,lletOact to ; the ,Bite.! Pim= wasTrtiorar e .gay one app•arrd to apes M. . IC Co aamiasioners Peterson and Saporta : shared t traffic safety with future develapr ent. CPO Ie 1 concern ;; regarding.. Commissioners Newton, Barber, Roaborcugh, Pyre, and Moan aleo aha . d the CPO's concerns regarding traffics however, they Lupporta d scoff e reco� suindat 'aon as boing ;a vilble solution. Commissioner itosborough movsd and Corirasioner Barber seconded to approve 8 89 -05 based on abaft to findings and conditions. Motion carried'' by majority cif,. Coarniasioners lreao+nt. Commissionero. Saporta and Peterson voting no. 4-...«. ...,A . . , M y Mr. .1A .,a; _ ail x>ta _''^t Y?!"""N.:6"", o._, "tF Fv , 2wi' "HaarNw++la^.Sni..!'S',^§". 'ih 'tkh;,r":.rK ins ;. `" ,., rw,r auk w. as w -fi %... rIY4 sax .,..r; . ,.w �7 pw: M ,r r. rw, Ai9C Cry ec c.:r t4M4 a w"1 :i"r.:e5 o-4 >, • y + 5,, 1 N y r d f 6 } -.. �71 �+ M'0 �.5 # w .,�h 'k 'hl F MF ��r'{° '�,r F�4r1� e. Yl,rw .... e.• zrw>wr�,:. at s ��',.�+,. a,�4N ut,... rvw a �a Mn ,fi- +... BBa ' N 'di rquest for a Ccmprehonsive Plan' hawandm nt from a lid ..7Mri., «' .aw Dens y '' ;� . Profesional ,Coimaercat and a Zone- Chango. from R -4.5 ResidRientiaY�4 4.1 to t , 5 ni s /acre , to C -P Profea iona1 Comm rcial) for ( seven parcels and. portions of two` others totalling epp*oximataly • 2 21 acme. Also r*aeited *4..f40 acr andment 'to the Metzger- 9rogreasa ©e,+mmunPl ty. 101an to revise the alignment o£ s 93r0 Avebc^n 0,: toc&Tt N* 9220, 99.60, 9330 Locustt. 10115 92nda 9 25, 9255 Maple1e0 (11CTM 181: 35Als, tax otaa , , , r , pants' 0,1002) 7tr0 701 702, SAO, 501 600 900 and flf 28 0i t P1ann r Deborah Stuart iew, d the propo �e1, noted cPiianges in the staff re rt an; ip daa ataff o toast re nsiae Plan �� .�c�m►►aenc'iationa fore appzoval of the s Son® Cih 0 she cuendiaa�.a..t and, `�' triage' fOr.�*e t Chad a � ®r ®2 g de�ri.a,l Of the CCe ratiinsive Plan hmendment and BO NI residential lots? and denial of the B sac r vit ito sr�i�+d tho, �i�ets e P �' the psi: Progress Cotnmuriiity Plan. Discussion f41:i0tted r,.041±01-04':.. the '. proposed development. the proposal could =esu9 in aia c�han ©s tea Hi hw�a .erns iaifiatit�g' trot Randall WOolw , Clan:. an sneer, earned traffic coilicae oll wed regarding who would bear 0 e w. nation fA 217. Die the � coat of ' a: ait�, "d�R . accea�e!ee to gthe ; area, traffic oi,rctnlation, traffic; ca . cirt ", eurrouiind ., tg ford n9 ac'cea� to 21 , and i gnay,itition � 7 p? comassumw 2, 1989 of ' P ,I� - a ��y� �p�� ^�p�T /fir APPL7 chlI 8 PR!$/ RTi , I o David Slake, Partner, Trill Crow Ccmpanl„ 10260 SW oeeeriburg 1 Portland, OR 97223, ,reviewed the existinT site and proposed .structures which could; be constructed withouic the prc,possd comprehensive Plan Aerendment. He reviewed the' layout of existing tal'a.`__i patterne 8e reyiewedl the proposed structures if the ,, sarehessive Plan, tone. Chang, end Metzger Progress community Plan. t amended. Hey reviewed the • ro eed road ali nt, adding that the :• proposed alignment ` ovide ]� Pe c3� g � , would pr a, "Oat' sr collector *treat and that the school would 'benefit by :additional' parking and better screening. Dis<Iuseion followed With,eomeissioners regarding what would be pormitt9' what is • proposed,, and the road alignment. Commicsi:.oner rowton left 8135 PM o Cathy Chase, 6365 SW St eve, Tigard, OR 97223, stated she is a member Cf • Iwo 8 and a member of the Parent Facility ►seoaiation ' at M tzgor School,, She read, and submitted written testimony regarding Meetings she had attended and th e results of those, meetings, She waoti Cc the aeaission to know that she had td with a number of people in the community and the pec:4` c. ;favor the applica4t's proposal with tha comprehensive Plan ,ndment. Andrew 1 g 1; OR 97223, i 501, ha©" lived in the area for 20 Years. He felt the traffic, . problem*s viers created by the shopping center. He supported the applicant ' s request. Ann Creswell, 8775 8W Locust # 13, Tigard, OR 97223, favored the proposal. Jack Steiger, 18436 SH Sandpiper, Laka Oswao, OR 97036 supported the proposal. Mrs. Mork, Daughter -in -Law for Doris L. K.;oinpell,' 9220 SW Locust St-, Tigard, OR, 97223 supported the proposal. t'sart Prssle , 9260 SW L Tigard " R 97223, tax lot 700, the' Y Y Locust: , OR fa�l�orud prcpoeal. r Michael presley, 9260 S. Locusts, Tigard, OR 97223, favored the pxopOsal stating six story parking Latin that .�e did not wand. to live next to a 1-- structure. o Brian Bean! 9225 SW haplelea €, Tigard,, O!t 07223, lot 600, *upported the . props ®al for the follouin. reasons: Different grout) already lr ®ady support Proposal. roposal . 2) N one n s wants to live . n s neat to a six story parking ) 'the new being P Po 9 e��ru��ture. ew road lain ro eed �,r,+ould. benefit Metz. er school- Rick Rogers, 9140 Sid Locust, lot 202, stated that he s the Closest residential .. P ro Psr" t Y and . is in nu as rt of thO proposed development. stated aexisting roads in shabby � ©notion Ale ©: adit# r l parking or ah scY%oJ will increase *�tie e safety. z PI�4ldt S$�[Ol� ��S " � 2o 19$9 ` - �8 3 J w F • J • J? n Mark Vander Yacht, 9125 SW Locust, Tigard, OR .97223, lives in the County. His basic concern is traffic created by Washington Square. He felt Trammell Crow's' project would have a limited impact. RerrY 8255 dl Ma P leleaf o Tigard, AR , 97223, tax lot f 702, supported the r e9� t o Brian Halverson, 10180 SW 93rd, Tigard, OR 97223, tax lot 701, has the only home which f ace.4 the Trammell Crow pro j ec t o If the six story Pr.-eking structure were approved he is close enoucl to count the brick,. He supported, tha proposed request with the ground level parking structure. John S. Hl xen, 9960 SW Oak, Tigard, OR 97223, opposed the proposal. He felt traffic concerns should be taken care of prior to development. REBUTTAL. o David Blake stated they recognize that there is substantial traffic in the improvements will not happen if �r supports urban renewal; however, area and su developant is prohibited. o Dic,aussion followed with staff regarding approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment requiring a deed restriction on the residential properties and improvements to SW 93rd Avenue. PUBLIC SMARMING CLOSSO o Consensus of the Commission was to support Trammell Crow's proposal, especially ,since they have the support of the neighbor-hood. t, ie Commissiov also felt a deed restriction should be required for the resident r l properties limiting de !elopment to a parking structure as Prorogued. Their recognize that tr& ff is problems need to be addressed. . Csannralalsioner ffyre moved and Co Wiesicener Barber seconded to rorward a recommendation for approval to Cf.ty Council/ further recommending that City Council impose a a rin� a y limiting development on the residentia.L property to a two single ate kin g structure ((top at grGle 1, gel) . Hotian carried unanimously by Commissioners "Present. RECESS 0:15 PM Fr R$CONVEMa 9:25 PM 5.3 0Ogt,REBEN8rVE PLR, AMNNDMIHT CPA 83 ---04 S 8 /P08CC LAM as RPA e 2 A request for a Comprehensive Plan map amendment from Professional IL� , al and a zone change from C-P 1rs�ia�1 to Medium High Density Resident. tY (Professional commercial) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units /acre) for 1.75 acres. A1000 a comprehensive map um- Density • give P�:an lea amendment from Medium Residential 9 y ReSidentia ►l and a zone change The from R-. al to Medum -High Density f 12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) to Ry"25 for 3.0t, acres., he asubje; t parcels abut each other. PLAWN ool ;lIIS81t 1 dg} -- ) Y 2, 1989 - r24413 4 • a tu E "REMIT s g : � ar.R�'' Ax8TRX C W ,COU March 14, 198'x'' 'iramme11 Crow Company' is currently in the process of.re esting a ,change .:.in the City of Tigard Comp ehensxve Plan tc change • the location, of Lincoln Street. The proposed Lincoln ` Street is :shown on ;'the. attached Exhibit A. Trammell ° Crow Company is also - attempt .n to chart the Tigard` Comprehensive Plan to allow the ion€ cructa\on of . a.. parking lot: 'nn the land .immediately to the west of the reap .ocated Lincoln Street. 4 . Trammell Crow Company hereby agrees that if `;the Comprehensive Plan is changed to allow the use as proposed aid the 'parking .� 4t is constructed, then Trammel Crow 'Company will allow evening use of the parking lot to, Metzger School.. Trammell Cro‘a' Company also agrees to include the specif.i!,,cations for the proposed Li.nco1,0 Street a security 'fence along the entire length of : the Lincoln 'Street exposure to lvietzgtr School. 'The fence, shall included : 'R a cost of the street im r .vement and shall be included in tile. Local Lml p rovement District that will be forme. d fcsr the cor►struct�:or� of the road. �, The .Tigard School l �oa�d hereby supports, withou t obligating itse'lf to any financial 'responsibility, the necessary change in the Tigard. Comprehiensive clan that would allow the re Location of Lincoln Street and the use of the property west of Lincoln Street as a parking lot. Agreed and Accepted this day of March, 194! David . e! d i3-,ake Dr. Russ Jok: • ar- tner Trammell Crow Company mlowe.,rr uperi °'pen den t igard `schoo/ Istria 1; ,Enclosed please nd "a ;, draft of lasing and purchase ��:,of tax 35A8501, 35AB7`02 and 3:518600, w. eed of the properties. This ;'deed Jres' pioperty steal 7. be used only .for park restriction will be a .; reduction ' of versus. if the property is left as residential, an Lincoln Center Five is self - contained I on the cur 'N ►t1 zoned Com nereial-- Professions I trust. `k'}:wt this assurance will mitigate . an Ct?ncerne ,a effects tm tllae tom'-' 15e 141.11 , causehe�re local ocalt�afficss��s , zone change decrease ;,.n traffic if the r isa �acle with i restrictions. Y nce, Thank youi fOr e�ur ass sta, Sircerel,', TRAlMMBLL CROW COMPANY David C . Blake Partner DCB/ac Enclosures a._ _l. a; - i?_j_. [r� 114►SG. R10 7112112.:. . 1506= s 3400' �; 3aor(e. Sit C.%' ID a so {t L 4 -t «1h E• R 4 4.11. -}� 1,2 1E:7 10 8 !r ers' t 7 — • 10x05 o 2S4*$- r7D W . 130 4'.13 i '. 4.12 CIA, H 3 sP [ w OIL 3300 { I 1 .93Ar. 1 t 1 1 --1 I ai=l 1. ! I wI i 81 ti 9 f i a s = 1 �' "'7s_ 3302 • ` 3303 3304 3403 M 1 .ze-Aa .22 AG .22.4C. . .1VAa 1 ' 1 1 1 I 1 I 02 "' A600 I i 3301 PI an it.." ( 08A:. s ,,,„ 02 As. -I- 1 1 'OAK t a' L SCR., 323 -4d wtDTM.1 FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 00 NOT RELY ON FOR ANY . OTHER USE W ASHINGTO zoo ULAA ►.�! t1i.N ASS}SSMLN1'tr r ;t1315'19 a:'_ 101- AiSIIIKr,T ONLY 00 Nt?► [It/ -. FOR Dinh Lin 1. Please find encl� sed .a .;copy of AYa t a, agre, me Bchr ol .s �riet and ,� Trammell Cron compaa y, su 'port of the T gard Conaprehe�n �.iv Pls information. � f you have any questions .ncerely TPAMMELL CROW C(MP IJY David C. Blake Partner DCB/ac Enclosure ontac4Lb 11 •` -/ IJ !!* AGREEMENT iiETwEklux iGPRE ND• sexoctz DISTRXCT :arch 14, 1989. Trammell Crow Compny is curret.lzly in the procato,3 of ,requesting a change, 'in the City of Tigard, Comprehe.nsiVe Plan to change. the Location of Lincoln Street. The proposed. LinColn Street ts shown or the attached "F.1chibit A. . Tratimell Crow Conipany is , also attempting to change the Tigard , Comprehensive Plan to a11w the cons.truct:ion of a parking lot on the landTmmediately to the west of Lhe' kelc)citted Lincoln "Stree.t. Tramiel' Crow, Company hereby agrees that if the Comprehensive Plan is changed to aiiow the use as IDroposed and the paring lot is constructed, then Trammel Crow Company will 'a.3.1oTAT eveill.rtg use Of the parking lot to Metzger, School. Trammell Crow Coznpany also agrees to include in the stotacificati.orls for the proposed Lincoln Street a security fence along' the entire 1ength. of the Lincoln Street exposure to Metzger St;h6t$1. The fmce shall be included as a cost of the Stet 1.mprovernent, and shall be included in the Local Improvement District that will be formed for the construction of the road. The Tigard School Board hereby supports, without obligating itself to any financial responsibility, the necessary cilli.avlge in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan that would alicso the relocatal_cm: cit Lincoln Street and the use. of the property west Dt Liacoln Street as ,a parking lot. Agreed and Accepted this day of March, 1989. David C. Blake r. RtSS Zfoic artriEir Tramnoll Crow ComPanY Tigard School .i,:astrict ° if lcb Box 5396 10260 SW Geenburg Road re off,:: re ow, :2 Sincerely, TRAVEL', CROW COMPANY' David C. Blake Partner DCE/ac • Must be sent. to D]LCD 45 days 'Print ` o} ' the. final i eairin Se Jurisdiction .�r vf Date Mailed 4 -3 -89 Tooal F,.19 Number Date Set •,or Final Hearing on AdoPt on May 22, ;1989 Month day Time and Place for Hearing � .3u a.l T � a r d ��. i a.1 . y 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tiaar , OR 97223 Type of Proposed Action (Check all that apply) Compr+ebensive Land '7 Plan Amendment Regulation Amendment New Land` Use Regulation Pease Complete (A) fog Text Amendments and ( ) for Map Amenditents A SUUMInary and PL rpose of Proposed Action (Write a brief description oaf' the proposed action. Avoid �d h a g Zy technical ` terms and stating "sere attached".) 10u:1e Map Amendments 'i y. Out the Following (For each . area to be changed# provide a set::.r to sheer if neces,sar o not use t& :: lot number a.ione. Current Plan ilesignattan t Pn~opoF.,ed Flan Designation. Low Density Reenti.al ;ess'1,,.5 . offal Current Zone: Proposed Zone: } .: 'c ! le -�i .. .. r .. s - .r 1` . acte) C°.z mil_ Location' ' 9220, 9260e 9330 LocuS r. 10115 St4 92nd: �,225 925. p l elea rest of ; he Lincoln• Center dre. open nt northwest ' .. Acreage 'involved: lab ept Does this Change In�clude:� 'an �.V .c;1, � iokn _ . • _ es : ;''�..,. ,` �;o w For Residential' ,angas' Please Sped Deosity`° in Units Per Vet Acr: current Density: The proposal also requests an Wendi ent to tL.e° tetz PlFoin to revise the align►. oeik o Li t o1 n Street ad acent tw p �.j m e:ce1►7 ., a •kk .r'n as't statewide 'Goa,1s Which''. .-%-- List any State of Federal. A.ge�c eS o Loc�a1?F:,, GOwernMeft or, Local Sreeia, ich may be ut�e '�es ed �n '.or n�p�set .d ,the , Service Dis{1.ric,ts 3! , ' Proposal- Direct Questions t,ind Cc efts To jerrir , Offer, Assi,Stant: Plannat 1 ,� 13125' Hai y m ' City ©f "�'ugard -,:� _Tiaard, Old 97223 ._�._...... (Phone) '639.4.171. rtment of Ls.Ynd CnnserVatiO De��a a...� 1,� 5 Court Street N. 1,a1en, Oregon 9731.0-0.5090 0TIEp . If more 'copies of this forty are needed, � contact. the �DL4":1'i this form _ .please era paper. office at 313- OIiS ®��f or t '.°;� be duplicated to be B�f l� "text" on re advised �.. that require �'he Mated of �, pacmp� ®�a�l Please be ener,a1 description of the intended action is snot ' pro V ld�r VL a .. a`6��d��✓•, ... A � t�lati ©1'1t a rA�.s must be plan and land use re3 suf�ie�a�.nt. Proposed p ane� the final e r1 (See OAR 155a-18-020). OLCD Pile limber <pa ypar oposedfot' i • mg Tigard Planning Department A 8 f -05 /zC 89.05 CROW . OREG0N INC. Vii; regueet - or : a coMPrehanaive Plan nendi■ent„ from Low Dena ty Reeiiden :isl'. taa . Profeee • nal Cohnaercia1 and a Zone ,1 0imi c ge from R-4.5 . (Re sident3 a1, .5 unite /acre).' ,14 f.. (Profea ional Poi amercia1) for 9 parcels tot . ling „pprcui,iniatel 1.84 acr ^ee. ',Also' ;requested .ie' am 'amendment to the .rMetzger- Progreso <' y Plain, to revise the alignment of Lincoln f treet. ' „LOCATION: 19220, 9260°, 9330 Locuat 10JS 92nd; '9,225, 9255 Mapl?ale-anf , (6WCTM 151 35A3, lute 700, ,:011, 500, '501, 600, 900, and parts: of 2800 and i002) Attached the sit ® `Plata and n p► lidant a state a t for y o+ „ c evi er From information ®uppliedt by vtwioan® departs ants and ,a4cOnaiea .ad from other i.nfouation ava. %labl+„,' to our staff, a revert . nxt \tiaommendation will.' be -prepared and a 'decision' w$,11,` be rendered on the prop; ,al 'in that ' near I future. If you wish to comment on this applicati'on,, we, heeil,your bst �►it�ri]I. C . 1969. You may use I the :space provided "b> low or attiAtchil, a eepalrate letter, to retur 'n your comments. I y.91w unable _ ta. res nd a y the Iaba�ye. daaite.. please phone the staff contact 'noted below with your cos ante and. confirm your comMenta writing n asp 800191 ass Pc ® ®i1 le. ' If you have any questions regarding this da� , r, contact the Tigard Planning DepartMent, P® Bra ; 233 7, 13125 $W all E'1i,Vdo , Tigard', CTS. ;7223. PEONS: 639- 4171. „� Ym ,pgpg� ST W C0flTAc i fJe �ry tiYffer PLBAs I . CHECK THE FOLLOWING I9 EMS TUAT APPLYt We have reviewed the Proposal and have no ob jeetiona to it. Pisses Contact ___..._ of our off ice. Pte . se refer to the endorsed letter. Written Comments: ,„a, 4' Name of Person Commenting: (:►0' Phone Number: bkm /CPA89 -05. BKM TO: FROM DATE: Jerry Offer Randy WCcae April 12, 1989 YORE CITY Or TIPARD, OREGON SUBJECT: CPA 89 - 05, 2C 89 -05 Crow Oregon Inc. BaolcsEpund The applicant requeat5 a Comprehensive Plan /Zone Change from R-4.5 to C ri o The area of the requested zone change appears to be approximately 2.2 acres, not 1.84 acres a - rotated in the application. The applicant also requests an �.-- -� 2 �°W 91rd Avenue (Lincoln Street) . amendment to the gra�pos ®d aligr.,.:�a: -� �� Ate_ 1. The primary traffic access to this site is via Greenburg Road. Gresnburg Road in this vicinity is 6xPeriencing substantial traffic' congeatir, . it is unlikely that the traffic congestion in this vicinity will be resolved merely by adding traffic lanes and signals. Instead, it will likely be necessary to provide now rc adwa y s or revise the alignment existing roadways to provide ad quate capacity bet ween Highway 217 and th(T. commercial developments along Greenburg Road. an 2. There currently exists in this vicinity substantial property with C-P sand C -G zoning and potential for s�;ibatantial development or rode Pm y these existing C -P and C -G properties could Development or redevelopment of tYae® g cubetanti- ).:.y increa� O the traffic ta Greenburg Road near g way demands on A 217. As mentioned above, the street impl ?oveme typically required as conditions of development may not be ads g a. tO to provide the additional traffic ca p acit y needed for full development under the existing zoning.' 3. The C -P zone provides the potential for development with much higher traffic demands than the existing _ 4.5 zonin g . The 1® de, velo Pnent which the applicant au g ge®tS for the p r p rtyk if rezOned, could be expected to increase week amy traffic by more than 1,000 vehicles per day and to increase the evening peak, hour traffic approximately 2O$ vehicles per g ftio by alp] noun. The applicant a traffic analysis report for a proposed ent for the site, 1® loan�t ilea submitted ng that. t�a�� pray eed development would, development te, '�.ndvat generate rat additional 1,622 vehicle trips 'per weeJk ay. l cC -P zoned properties between Oak Street and Highway 217 have • Currently, 21 i: Due to conflicts with. � is exiting �1waSr very poor access to Greenburg Road and Ri � frt��n Oak Street is prohibited' the nearby fr®oway ramps, traf iE f icy frca� the turning Left (south) onto Gres bar Road. Therefore,ytr�f from to 217 Ga��,�.. b. d�rlving through C -P properties has no legal access g y CPA 89-'08/Z0 8 5-05 ENGI NEERING lNERRIYG COMMEFT: PAGE 1 tirr terra adjoining residential streets. The Metzger -Progress Circulation ae;*pted'by Washington County in 1986 proposes to provtde`a new access Zrom dabs Street to Greeraburg, iioad by. extending 93rd Aven *e south from Locust Sttoet to oak Street. Traffic from Oak Street could thOn reach the freeway by driving north on 93rd, west on Locust Stx'eet, nand then south on Grecnburg fload. This would still require the' 04k Street traffic to go approximately a quarter cl a mile out of direction in' order to avoid' making the illegal `left turn from Oak Street onto Greenbut;g post. The applicant :Pro Poses to re lign ro ed 93rd Avenue" rmoving ids intersection with p P� realignment would increase, the Locust Strea�t further eas�t: The Pro Posed ro�ali nmea�t out-of-direction travel for Oak street traffe attempt ing to ;reach nignway 217 via Gresnburg Road. 4, It appears that any sone change from low density residential to commercial would further increase traffic Problems. leme It further appear. . ® that under thexisting it Y the usual conditions 432 f on property could adequately address the traffic problems . Theme €ore a t he , Citv Engineer recommends that the zone chan e be denim at this time. . It appears that the proposed realignment of 93rd Avenue would further increase, the difficulty of access hstween the oak Street properties Y currentl zoned C P and fighwaY 217. The likely result creased w traffic through the residential area of Oak Street. There the r -rec„ 11mende shat the iparo�oa�s, amendment to the Met�„zt Proanate �n in®er' clgeglm&Isaa_gtadytg_denied at this 3.ml. The propoee4 new alignment of 93rd Avenue doer; not meet City standards, ae g approved, it should existing City design , atazn the curve radii are too short. 1f a new alignment i® be r ®quire�d to comply with g y lords for a minor collector street. �. Additional Engineering and Planning review is required to resolve the traffic P robl ®me of this area which are inherent in the existing street layout. Such a review should go through the normal compcehenaive planning Process ani would likely result in adoption of reviskans to the existing traffic circulation plan. A® a part of such review, the potential for additional C -P zoning and poi . 1 street realignment could be investigated. .:. A ssib e joint funding of such a study has been 4iecusn4ed` with maor property owners in .tb area; however, to date, such a review llxao not been initiated. existing sanita sewer a stem in Locust and MP reet9 appears $`�* y a leleaf Six, to be adequate to accommodate the proposed cone change. 10. There is currently no storm drainage eYetem to serve the proposed sone change except cr roadside ditche . storm site is 1 redev ®1 ®�I ed� � it will bra �ne+�e eat' p � Y r. a etem r lt, is likely idt at the store drain would be �extendinr�; to Ash Creek. inatalied in conjunction with the extension and improvement of 93rd Avenue CPA, 89 -05/ZG 89 -.05 =- ENGINEERING coM 4EN S - PAGE 2 eny, °,.the ` refine ®t for .rev s on, to Lincoln. Ware, t)' until a ,plan has'. etween ' the Oak, . Streo .proper e CPA 89 -05/W 89 -O ENGIN ERXNa CO NTS • LAAivt r r �.�r1M'i.• arch" 2d,.. .98 Digs ,Tigard Planning Departrnt CPA 69 -)5 %ZC 89, -05 CROW, 0I GONA INC e A r oueet or . 'a Com j�rehena :vim Ply i aneradmenit from ; Lowr Deas ty , Residential th Professsiona'l mnme»ei:a l •any a zono Change. , -4.5 4LRe ids ti.a li . 5 un .to / acre) to C- �P a� seio* a1 Commercial) Lor 9 celro totalling a rpp ©xi ate1y «S4. aouee.- A:e® raga Bated i0 an amein ent tea the Metzger. Progreaa Com z Ltyr P1a to e J ae ` ►20 9260 9330 tocu,et thll3 sa��a71ffi@>ilt ®� S,'iSG��OY>�a �'itr @��. ��'�0,�,,,•,,,., •» ® r i• ; 70 , x, 702, 506, 001, 600, 900, and paaitta of 38 -7 Attached is the Sits Plan a►nd a $icant., r statement ' fer your revieTh Fri. intormationr supplied b vari.1 is oepa ent ®' a�aa ;. agencsi ea+ and :rfrOa other inforamation available to our ataff, a report, anM, recon endatieS a L11 be ' prepared and a decision will be rendered on the pr pool in the nee fluture. If yew wish' to cprantaitit on this appiicaticn,. yea Seed,',yeter':OetiatiOts k4i Ag.. . 1989. Yes may usa the space provided belew or attael ` it separate Jett i? to return ye' !r cements. z � errs.. a> ij le.. to ree rnd b► t �e;�, ►ve c et ®._ ' pl ass ,phone the staff ' contact noted 'below with your comments and conii your comtents in writing as seen as , possible.. I you ha fie t a .regarding-' this matter 'contact the Tigard Planning eparts/m at o BOX 3 t .3126 SW Tigard,, OR 91223,- � IOI+ a X39 - .4171. STAFF CONTACT: JerrM► o1i:or' PLEASE CHECit THE .FOLL 9WZNe ITEMS MAT APPLY: • We have .reviewed the proposal and hake no objactiotaa to it Please contact i ©f our office,' Please refer to the enwloeed letter. Writtc+n Coneate ,.�,.., . .. .... Name 6$ Person Continent Ong s Phonr0 Number:-- 5'�'tC. bkm /CPA89- -05 . Bid! wti tt. TO: li'RO»l: Tigard planning Department RR; r `rA 897°5/2C 89705 CROW OREGON, reg'.,iest for a Comprehensive Plan aaendment from Low O;�nsity, Reeitl�nti81 tai F`rofesaional commercial and , a, Zone Change from N= 4.5 iResideA i,al, 4.5, unite /acre) to C -P (Professional Commercial) for 9 parcels 1totalling approximately' 1.84 acroe. Also reluested,is an amendmeii t to the Metzger - Progress Community Plan -to to revise the alignment of LincolLr Street, , LOCRTI ®N: 9220, 9360, • 9330 ,Locust • 10175 92nd; 9125 ; 9255 Hapleleaf (WCTN, 181 35A8, , tax lots ' 700, 701, 703, . 900, 501, 60e, 900, and pats Of 2800 and 1003) Attached is the Site Plan and /4pplicsat' m Statement ,for your review. From 11 • nfo ation supplied by various depart= ate anc agencies and from other inf4rmation available to our ' staff, a report and re::'1\saa.mendat ion: be • prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in they near future. If you wish to ccmiwint t4z this application, we to by A �• 198!1. You may us's the space provided below or° attach a Separate 4etter, to return your comments. of a as a to es nd b. t ' above datQ plea e Phone the Staff contact noted below with your counts and confirm your ::cutnent possible. have away questions 3 9? 133 2 ink ® in writ ink as s ®on as If u thle Matter, contact the Tigard Planning Dep nt, PO Ross , Hall blvd., Ti�3 °►xd cent, OR 97223. PHONE: 539�4171'Q STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer ,__: .--- �-•� PLEASE ' CHECK T r., FOLLOWING ITENS THAT AFP7.i We have reviewed the proposal, and have no objections to it. please contact a' our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. w., Name of Person Cormen1 :i , ..,. phone NumbGr; y bkm/CPF.Z9 -05 «H ! FROM: Tigard Planning ,Department • CPA 89705/ZC 89 -05► CIOWW OREGON, A :rea ael3t 'for `ai Ocmprehen ®ive Plan AMOndment . 'From L rt den8i Resideuntia1 tee Professional Commercial and a;, y ZO e , Change from R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 'unite /acre). to Ca-P (;Professiona1 C n'mercial) for '9 parcelt3' totaling . approximately 1.' 4 acres. Also requested i® an wMendmet h !to te Metzger- -P rn roga eas Community Plan to, re vieo`T the = .ligautent of Lincoln Street. L .TX0Na 9220, 9260, 9330 ,Lo `at 10 .75 92rnd; 92 5, 925 ° fapleleaf ; $WCTM 151 5AR� tax lots 700. '' 701, 702, 500, ! 501, 600, 900, and paw® of 2800 and 1002) Attached is the Site knip1i ©ant a Sit atea ent ter' your review. Pro i information sugpl sd y various departmente: -and agencies aid srom Other information available to our eta.' "� a reprn°t and , recon mandat t bail be prepared and a deci®ion will ,;be rendered ond, the If you Wish to co gent 'on, y e 1959. You racy a attach a eepaaratO lGtrter to se the space providod balofnt or return your comments. ' If you aze u $J 1e ' 'Above e pi eeke phone the' staff contact rioted below' ,b:nth your" cornmoi *t and c ®.afbran rotOtv ccninerntm in writing as :O an n a po esib1e. If you havo an? cpuetiane s ega rdiing this Matter, contact the Tigard 'Plana.1 `ig Departtnat3nt, PS ,9ox 13397 d 13125 $W Nall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. P&it r 659 -4111. STAFF CONTACT: Serg°tr; Offer --- , PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: X We have reviewed the propooal and hav no objections tc it.: Please contact of our office, Please refer to the enclosed letter Written Comments: ..,,_. N a of Person Commenting: o La rri 'Hibbard - 68 Phone Nur der: 2C)9 1■ DATE: March 24 1959 FROM: Tigard Planning Department CPA 89 -05/ZC 89--05 CROW OREGON, INC. A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment far a Low Density Residential to Professional Coaminercia1 and a'' tir Zone Change from R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 unite/ad. e) to C-P (Professional cc mercial) for 9 9 approximately 1.04 acres. r ®� Also P otal3if: amendment to the Metzger - Progress Community Plan lee A�0s�aes'te�d i® afY the al gnm9nt of Lincoln Street. LOCATION: 9220, 9260, 9130 Locust; 10175 92nd; 9225, 9255 Mapleleaf (WCT14 /51 35 B, tax lots. 700, 701, 702, 500, 501, 600, 900, and parts of 2800 and 1002) licaft ® statement review. From Attached for � your Atta d i8 the Site P�.an and a r 0 info nation supplied by various „departments and agencies and from other will b infoz!mation available tc our staff, a report and' recommendation but rae prepared and a decision wits be rendered onn the proposal in the near If yo>z wish to comment ela tidal '' application, 'tla`i, Meted 3/01/r COMMente by Ziaril 6, 198 8. 'rout may tine the s.patc e providad t)r attach a separate a tletter a t s® ret ea yOur co ®n . a a��eta�c es f b tae phone the staff contact noted b ®log; with your comments and confirm yoUo r • ;� questions regarding commelnts i i writing ate soon as possiblea, If you have y � this matter, contact the Tigard Plaranimg Department, PO Box 23397, 1312,E SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4)171. STAFF CONTACT: y Q er .: PLEASE CHEM TP3 FOLLOWING ITEMS TEAT APPLY: Vile have reviewed the „r, o oral and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: pa- w REQUEST COMM= ?larch 24 1989 II' FR°14: Tigard Plaanning De ar't en,.' : ca ,;'S9 ..®5 /ZC 59. Ox', A.OW O1tr ON., INC. A request fo ° A Cc p rehe00,ive Play Amendment glom ',.Low" .Densi y sidentia1 to iirofessi , e 1. ad a Zond hange fro 45 N0sidea3d. � ur 0 /cre)� 'C (Pro e= E ional R n ' . i 1 * for 9 hole totalling appr xiaate1y .11:. #4 acres. ao ir= .4,g4Stee in a amen nt to the Mfietgeger ..Pr eee nity Plan to v .se the. alignmeant of Winncola� Street. ;�TYON ;9220, 9260, 9.330 ust; . 1017 ► 92nd -` 9225., 9255 Mapieleaf ;(W .181 '36d 3, t , :n:'+ 700, 701, 70a3�r 500 _ `5Q31,0®, '900:4" A, d a_ t,to of 36130 n3ac$ 1003, . ., tache:a 14 the Sits' Plan And ta�pp ioaant' a t tate nt . 'or your -review.: F iof !aati�aa . a�lalb a ®r ® ®t � +m�ttstex►�:e d �;�aa � t � i t�ae�e 11 1h �, as r� neaar ,�4 formati na l a g o f prepared and a dleoLii on "i rendered on the ,props a1 the . , future. It you a 3.r�h to c ►nt on thi ► aPib tcet a, a ' , - ' §a 19A2! ou' RAY u ®d! the • Once grov4 -.red below 'o'r .a Math a� separate letter to rattan your coaaa ents. 3f , are 0_.1.e to nee it _'b tkn ®'' ,,,.. ;,, P aa�lba�tre ��a @+� lease _ phone the staff a oant'ct noted below wi, h your co> nta confi+" 1 your comments La writing as noon AS 11,0SSible. If yoaa have any equestiona ,^ Ar inng this >aau ,tter, contact the Tigaarad Plaan ai `": fart ent, PO ''ox 23397', 13135 SW Nell S1vd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639..41711.0: STAPP CONTACT: Jerj Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FALLOWING ITEMB TE T APPLY; 4. Te have reviewed the proposal and have no ob b e ctione to it. Please contact of our office Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments ' 411■,16.4.4470■IMI 1111111•11,1101111•941‘,4 monsoriivommoornoft Name of Person Corunenting. Phone Number= bkm/CPA89-06.0XIK • • CPA 89-05/ZC 89 -05 'ChM; OREGON, YNC.,' A request for a r: comprehensive :Plan. • Amendment from :Low )ei city' Residential to Profesr ioana3 ' Co srcia1; an d i -a, one Change !: from R -1.5i R aeaideritia1 , X4 5 its/ 1 t C7P (Prof® ►ion i� Commercial) for , 9,'`' parcelEt, totalling appro'ianately, 1.04 acres. Alpo .requested is an omeildment, to the Metzger- Progreso CommgaitY,,Piain teS,'revi€se the ` alignment cf . Linctvin Street. th TEON: 9220, 9 ,260, '9330 Lacust; , 10175 92nd; 9225, 9255 Nap1Oleaf 1S1 35 700, 7 1 902, 500, 501, 600, 900, and parts of 2000 and 1002) Attached is tho S; te Plan - �� . cara t v ® Statement for your teView. ,. info tertian suppI4ed by var Lou; departments ments rind agencies and from Other info ►at Loan av,`J. table to'' Our a report aria reco andatLOm till. be .prepared' and a deiwiltion. will he re nd ®red. on the loroposito. it Ate bear future. If you wish to count on thiw application, we, newl. your colmimate by fir' 1.989. YOU may use ''''the, space provided below, or attach a seiierate letter to return your comments., you ;aria let th e' date please hone the staff contact :noted', below With your comments, and coati your writing as soon as possible., If y►ov have any quest on:3 regarding -*mate in this Matter, contact the Tigard Pla a ,na . Depaa mar c. PO BOX 23397, 13125 SW Hall' Hlvd. , Tigard, OR 97223'. PHONE: 639 - 4191.' STP CONTACT: ferry„ der PLEB CHECK, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal, and have no subjection® to it. Pleas contact of our off oe. Nave of Person Commenting: Phone Nueber : bkm/cPA89-05.BKM FILE O: ei 'f95r� LOCATION : q 51 ar ,133ra 44,0to st loi1 q ;n 4 gam's /ass /44, 702, 0Y-00? 400i 900i eort Oaf/ CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DEtISIOIli to v ICJG COMPIISSION /DATE OF HEARING: ( RINGS OFFICER /DATE OF HEARING: CO Nactm !DATE OF HEARING: QUEST FOR COMMENTS (SEE ' A` 'TACHEO NOTIFICATION LIST),' DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE >BACK: CONTACT PERSON (staff): ATTACHMENTS TO BE DISTRIBUTED W VICINITY mAP NARRATIVE SITE PLAN PREPARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL L L ER OF ACCEPTANCE, VERTISEmEi T FORS TH REQUEST, FOR CON(' EidTS : :LANDSCAPING PLAN _.. ARCITECTURIL PLAN APPLICATION (ate accepta� T.T. 8 T.T. ;ORE IAA ate) (Date 2n4 hearing) (Date) USLIC HEARING NOTICE 'T SURROUNDING ►ROPERTY OWNER D te be mailed: a.l s1.1....w..�.. __ 1OTECE TO DLCD with wti L attachrnehts ht /16900 ct DESCI IPTION , OP T �PROti 6S7,,; This as a � p ro asal . amend the Metzger-Progress ogu r c u nit Plan, and to change the corresponding zoning, foreght parcels next to the Lincoln Center office projcvt. r subject parcels are currently designates "Residents proposed "" .al.' Profess. oral "" The total area oaffec ed is approximately C ®mm�.rc 1.84 acres, and t hcltzdes Tax `' Lots 700, 791r 702, 500, 501, 60u, part e: 2R00; 8, 000 s. f. of tax lot 1002, aid lot 900 are included az a housekeeping measure to align the current use with ! the Currant C i,ty o F Tigard copr ;asive plan. This subi` ittal also proposes to modify the Metzger- Prigress Community Plan to allow Lincoln Street, to be modifi0 according to the attached Exhibit A. The =.avers of the properties in question have authorized Trammell Crow Company to submit an. appiirslation for a zone Chang°* for : ' property (see ' attached' Exhibit Et) . This proposal will address the Comprchensal Ve Plan ; and zonintl issues with respect tc t: e F pr ►posed changel. A subsequent Development eview process will address the specified site design issues and the y elationshi p of the prof ect to existing development in t he ar✓a d dt thBS tike, ipecific plans for the ° ct have not been ed ]r owev :r, it is anticipated project en comple`�. . 100, 00 will oximately 0 that Five Lincoln Center. ` include approximately feet of office space with a single story , parking structure. It should be noted that, altho;' rw jh the propawrty under n i this ro osal �ti11 enhanc the detpelopm u t consideration p p e t yen of Five Lincoln Center, i' is, only a Portion of the act al land needed, as ineiicated by Haccottipanying vicinity ma a {. ' by tie `I`rr��ti1 tell Crow Several adjacent parc�lso also :owned y ealpany, a: -' „esignated office commercial, teal . also be ' evielo p ' t. 'included �n p�nent �f this base Of the....., ro, ec �. This ro osa p' �� 1 will also address the rerouting -in091 Street to show shy the relocation of nithe. street will dot on:y. facilitate the Construction of Lincoln V but also enhance hie ult ,Yaate purpose of Lincoln t eat, .. e e to enha ce the traffic aiGCesS frC>,ila the currentl.yli undeveloped lands Sc th o Oak Street The followin liva narrative will addreed: the criteria or approva of a Comprehensive .Plan Amendment and Zone; Change, anc wi .; :. show that the proposal is cc rsistent with the, applicable standards for appovali. • ' A CD X i . COXPRiHENIS IV r'll i' . FR WORE' a. Plan Amendment C riter is ,' Code provides three criteria, The C ®m�►unit:� , Development P . , of which must be met by a proposed quasi- judicial. plan amendment. Itk . this case, the criteria /deist 1eE reviewed both with respect to the property currently .design ated Residential, p and with respect to this adjoining Institutional portion. .,.YY With respect to the p arcels currently, designated Residential, (Tax Lots 500, 501, 600, . 700 r 701, 702) , both criteria i and ii appix i The change is consistent with 'applicable p: policies. .�. y change P A chap a of physical circumstances has occurred ii) since the original .designe do i. an Criteria i) is applicable given that the proposed changes are nec essary to allow the continued development of already zoned property namely Lincoln Center. In view of these criteria, ft is „'mos important to recognize that the suitability of t e site is a function of its relationship to ',the existing Lincoln Center project : and the other parcels currently designated office Commercial, which be part of Five Lincoln Center. '`This is particularly p o an since e these properties will he crmbined with abutting parcels currently ,,designated office . Commercial that will be redevelop ed for F. ve inco3n' Cente r • tin would be used es arkin for ri data � � p , g. the she 3.and under cons ' proposed 100,000 square foot building to bae 'built on properly zoned land. Criteria ii) is applicable given the natural growth of the Lincoln Center development. , originally all Of the land east of Creenburg Road was zoned residential. The office ceammun Fty known as Lincoln Center has grown as a natural result of the a to economic growth of the Tigard The, re a's proximity area. e Washin ton S � are r Hi hWay . 2 17 � and 'moat importantly, he critical mass of of her office tenants has ma a Linco 1 tr the heart of the office marker for the of Portland. The change zoning for ha s been accom plished in a piece meal fashiOn, one Wilding at ' a time. Therefore, the criteria of a change in physical circumstance, i.e. that the area is now the heart of office development residential nature of ... *hen, the versus the original the area Residential designation was applies is applicable The proposed area is ore of the laet commercially viable , pieces' of r 1 p ' o?p6i W retaining in the pity of , Tigard. for Class • deveio on- to acco lmc ate u g's'', cons rcc eff s necessa . Tne ComPrellensiite Framewe,r an of wash .'',1 gton rCounty provides the following statement to ",'describe ` the cb aractex ; of, Off ice C m itercia . areas: ' "alutitagt2rialLtASMI The purpose of .this district' provide for office comploxt . 1,d _ve1opme at to .T ouse professional, i istitu.t},.oi 1 p.: medical, : denta1 .y t� or an°ize �. com lexea, •ran�ti'ing governmer�t.��. space :.;needs , , �n g , P in size and intensity- small to ' high r�i se de act ti.„ development, depending ®n site. char eriatics a Of�;ice Commercial developments are ei p1s yee intensive. Certain p accessory commercial uses to serve the . enployees . of the complex and high density residential uses 'rimy be permitted through a Planned Development process. T he Lincoln Cei:ter project meet this .parameter ased upon its overall imaster plan, character and size. The inclusion of the subject � arcel � will allow the imp. lementation t f ,the next phase �r� fully t�e advantage of the p ositive atmospher e which has beers created. The Framework Plan >revidea the followin' ?vocational criteria' for Office Cominerci.al areas: c' ca. ° cn . Criteria a This district n'aay be used t� buffer crnmmercial and residei tia :, commerc {,gal and 3,nd strii l oar• ; �.es _ Tile precise loca it n residential and industr3.a1. u_ „�.�;�. �- of these use. , should ' be' daternmined by toe cobmut ity planning process takinf into account the , jpopa at .On and employment projectios. Generally, Office C��mme "�cial: uses should be :iodated Collector I and rteria intersections for visibility and auto access.' ,the' availability of pedestrian and transit access' als�i of great importance.' As noted above, Lincoln Center, as a tihoie, taeets these criteria due to its size, proximity to S.W. greenbur ' g Road oad and Highway 217, and location between Washington square and the Metzger residential area. The subject parcels, tieing west of the future revised ctension of Lincoln Street,` complied in the part to the Wash ,ngton County prorisione, as mentioned` above and will continue to comply under the city of 'Tigard ., commercial-Professional d esignation• addro Trammell Crow Company as consul��c� with eac ► o affected ;parties: involve with the change and h x ell Crow Company w1 received their suppii • ram , continue to work ;wj.th t, c. �! fEfcted part s to► insu; toot citizens- will `1tie ,pro�k 'aed an ,opportunity to ,7 involved in X11 hase of Lhe� . pl'ani? ng .process re:, inclusion of the subject Parcels" in. the .� rz tessional area wi ate. Comanerc.;.a�-y�.��:of. 11 fac the. fifth phase of Linc' ],n `. Center, thereby reinforcing. ,, business the viability of �.tQ .entire project and. the, , activity in the area. One hundred plus , jobs s swill 4.. the the building. be caseated by '� construction of � , e co When 3p1eted the l �a �, building will serve as a work , place for 350 people. INDUSTRIAL EVEL PI4ENT ,,,r ! Nfi ....: F _ Mp!°I' iD EQ Ofim_inaL_QH_Dgiumahusarisa. The subject parcels zoned residential are surrounded! on three sides by Com aercial -1,r afess1onal institutional prop?rt3 es. The . change in goning oI these properties will be oonSisternt with the transitional phase the area i3 experiencing: Cara level p�aaen `, s pressure .n t e area b f re. protection n ' tip sy c '1'hppiabl,� a appl i at o ns Letters of service aim from the Manger Water la, Unified Sewage e a er Sheriff 0 o:oe . • apartment mpact' �tateme currently ava determined throw • annaoartiti �.on cessaK Dv e eve10 nCiii Y T r � Y !. , roue f N TT AZE EUTI1R GY OW H AND P e a ionshi of ,.:the proposal tp the Metzger Therlt p.,. pp Circulation stud and overall . taportaton '° 'impacts is addre s�ei be oar. A +data lel traf f is study will be completed as part of tY Devei'opment, Review process. IV OTHER CONSIDERATIONS' A. 'traffic Issues The Metzger- Progress Circ;;u1ation Study was adopted ;by the Washington County BoA�;.'V. of County Ca rzm ssioners . ixn .May., 1986, as a part of the 'rerall Metzger, - Progress Coinuunity Plain which was adopted ' in 1983. . The purpose „* ,etzger- Progress' Circu'iation Study was o; adc ress apeci i,c traffic and pedestrian prob�.en�s identified during Plan adoption, , traffib,' c3rculati'on study of the Gretnburg ` toad, Oak Street, and' E ghway :2.17', intersection area. • The proposed prc j ects, programs, plans 'and policies recommand.ed in the sttudy, , as a ,result : of ; an. 'area' -wide transportation survey quett;ionnaire and public Meetings, ino .ude three major elements: *,e�',c�hk�orhsod. ��' :'r. ' le►en, �..pf" deSigneti 'Leo reduce through traffic on' ltyca : residential I streets, mpr ye north - outn auto circula tion and im rove ,raffio sefeety. ' *Access , afld Capjj y�. rovem .., ra . ;. polis ea. designed to alleviate existing ftraffic congestion 'an4 provide fob increased ca►pa+ty on ex isting arte ials and colle ctord,; a .d *PedeS .: , :: 'tn .ila r.. kit pro' e . u`'4 • . = = ( • 11 11 anj loft , designed to 1 provide` viable alternatives to t; Ato travel as well as to increase the safety and i.Icnveniencs of these,, alternatives." Four Neighbox.� o g he study which are Traffic osed in the + t • o e C liana ement Pro •.,�ctS • f in the .... vicinity es: ltl e ub: 4 RA! vlRw IPLACE ONINIUM t ofpne SHINOTON 1 rl I SOU/IRE • 27126 34 35 CRESCENT GROVE N C =mm=at -IiiI1@ �� . GE7 sr 41- ;ma 0 MN Ij As MIMININAIN MUM anwric SIR NM" =MEM SUM" 35t36 -4111 ONE AIM mi ♦ ' ®® __ Mini ;137,di .d., 11 MI / L RI 'I EMU si 111 111 mosso a. , AIWA AM AMIE IF •L• i ASM r• 01, Si maw ;er in SW L/1 ■ems- �u...'..■■ riateep Ft !NE alba Jr al NW ■ as ■1 3 . Raj Nwei Now at �� wl a® _� �► �1 EN ® =� N. 011 =Riga In :mem Nimik EZ Noir mil ENE 144.4, 114E 111 pr L 4E ,rnt 0#11N, !he Pal ..n .s140.0 v.6 S OZZ: zv Z2a= VV i ' V !I 0025. 1 "0175: '$HO ZZ'* ooi` 0S 1_ 001 001 , oS (009). 8 :1. 1g 6 c 1 -$ f-- -- ....1` i L:. o 1 01 L o .; :a' _ Iv C •.... :• 9- c 1 +`°; l0 1 f 9 8:1` . -' 10 a1 --r .r., - -. I a 71 I, - 0 [g .o.. 1O It I CJ Ns" IS. 001. s,r s ,4 /' of 1.7Iel1S/O 7C)HiS ..,e die.. i iz sirs d,'lD'1N31Y373 e:79%13IV M 09 X 09' t'H1ata ps -9O9 'WO ) .'$43 ZZ' 09 001 001 c O0i" 1 0>} it�F "vats s 9S'Z9 ZCER-PROGRESS. CWULATiOf COLN STREET XTENSI SOURCE: 'WASHINGTON COUNTY. DEPARTMENT OF 1:AlkN,FLU,A.S.,!..A.Du4111N.SpORTATION, 1981 '. A "T N:*,COUNTY otee* rr="•01. " t VI 1,1%11: Ni '11:■:114(;!.r?arvliAsNi kr:t/SE TitAt1,5r;;,11.1y7lpft erallet:41911 Malfeil#41. 06 twit 10.4.4..4.0:10.4. COW', v "" mix nzi il taii mug own In111 -sown mina Ens ___, . mem 111111111111111,111 lairtroatown, arel= ir.1.1ilajiii 1111414=11111P-'100 jatilm111111- gilt Ellimilat=i min riol:alopme rea it — - /t , . .. h! ,... .,. ,...: ,.,� ... ;.. ..1 t a h A1. ..y V 1 .:.r ,�nr �...i �,, ° o „ ^. ' . ,'�, J °` i A i'- i��9� � � � �. t +�..,� � ; ,.,; , .: , ,,,,- : `�.`- r :` �: , ., "; X „�;.r ;: ,`;;��' .i;, � ��+" , ' - .' , {A"H .1 • ' � �.. � '��: .,, .� . .., . .°' � ;e (;� ii�n, 4. � � �� •'��!'': .�.'! t, � � ! .�.. 'x�` � �A � 9'�ia y �'�:�� p� , .�y :,j i . J, ,�:.� ��,. � 1�..i � �,r r .�,1'3. ��h,� y �.:,� �" I; H;'e �{.�"� '�� .j +4• .'�S i � R a f f�. ..., �" � }„ 1 � ',I 1 ,I r ..1 �i t I ° '.Ei 1�� `c i �; .:�� 1 y , 1.,;�7 t •! � �:�n. c � i�: �,• 1. � �^ .`� �:�� 4tt ��1�f''i � wt:. ( ��r�..w"F7 1'^�-t 1 5 �M 1 v1 I �fi � 'j7 '� �'y;. ;r \ i .�,t ��`� � `�:� f��,: .�. :i �t �.i.�, 15 �; .� ,� , �. , ... ... � �� : , .� , �� .�. . ,. � . ., .., . . �. ... .., - a�� eru� � „.",..�� ' , ', ,u ..��: .� ..,, ,... . �,,,�. . � ��r�„�in��r�v _ � x�rr� 4rv � d ^. +` ,' W�t, rl' I� ;7 � ��i'�, � . . • � � � �� '�' 1C�+' : • .rN l G i �1� Tl1DY�` �, � �C�Y �. ,, ,�j , ,�. RES� �CUI.AY1� 5 a � , ; �I,,,'N ,. � M�T��ER� P tJ� �xM� .V�� TC�.�`��.�� , , �. ; , ., i , � � � ,<<� � .� ,� .a 4� i i�, i.; ,� r��"� ,✓ �f` � " a 7 } l I � �i:, � �.4" r'�; -� I :;. I�I,E �L,��: �,�e;. � ��R.EH��S �� PF�C�F�f��I�D� �TRE��' �', �;�� ,,.; � � .�..F � . : , , ,,,, y � �i ■' �� + C j � I1, I �� ti ' r� i �Y ' + � � Q. `�� iCA1'1��1� �� '� , .��. , ,5 , � i.�'��:.��a7 f� , � � �, �� .�', /� �+ �\ , J .:',. t 1 � � A��. 1` „ ♦ l'. h ��V�iI�� ,�h 1 � �i n. ,4' 1�� .ti t.. 1,, 1I i'� ,: I 'k ) .,�f � 7 15 �! ! '1' � c�� e�� 0�,�� r !,�r{i 'J,� ��I '��pr` I � y ` �,' � i i�� .� ��Uci�E.WA��HINA'PON COUNTY:OEPAR AAE ;., . ��, ;y� ._,� TA'T!� `1�85:' � � �ti'r1.�iHlr�'CT9N.:,?�OUtiTY,` ��'��' ,' `" ,w� :L.IhND USE,,AN�`Ti R�1NS��R N. ry :- ' , � ,. , . �.�:....��„ � :: ;� � `L� �:,;�Nr? TR�ANSS�I,�TaTib� "�n��' . , , „ , �. M �.. � '� 'E � 1 r��o:� � 5 ,: , . . ° � tw�s r�� s�Ow�t.,....0 QM�4w ,. , ..• I t .�� rr� � , (, ;n� ,�, gi�►f�aC f;'lCKCS• 'sOb�+Ow1.>QCT�N1Kf.SC+�! [ ', ,� +��r qI � c� `r� , `i.k�� ,MA�,i�'�9,�;� � r ��.1f1��ff=-''�Ia11ArQ,��Mlf�,�ilOti!�'�y��'l��+�:.?�:M•:LYNT+ <<�.',� �,v��L��' ��,,�'�7��,� �i�..:,«• �0 "'1��:.,:,�, �._f �":a �" y-�i�T:.�.u•.wt!�':�11r��:�4r,�4" '�r.�ti•r�. .� ., ' � , � �� ti � �,( : " r i, .; � � .`. , �t ,y�� 'p� y� " b o 'F � I . .� � � � �� h . . .. . .. 4 .. ,... . . �.' a y c i��A ��.' � f A 4 i.�' 1 i � � �� i ,��. �� . » . . . . . , .I 4!� � , .� . . 0�� , r � � � : , �. .:' . � `�'. . , � . : �i ..,, I ' �. , � .,..; . .. . . . . . . � . .. .i � , �., , 1 I ��' ' � � � � ��IEXt�Tq�Q'�;�OCAL,STREfT�- �, ��° 1� � ' , ,,� ',� ' IhCiP... . - ; , ' - �"'�EX��T " qINCiP-�L AR�'E�tiAl� � •�!��e�r�,.;��ANCiE '�C� MIl.1�lOR::Ci�LL:��TAR .� ' `�' 'E��TIN�'�LOC�4 S�Rl�ET�, �i�heM�un�ue�na��r EXISYIN(�MIN��`�Ai�`��,Al1AL• p,"6�O��t'�.:.�HAi�GE�T�,1�ti�N�i� CBLLECT4�A .� •�: •�.: "�.; , . .. , , � � �� .` �� Xl3T�NG�MIA�A►F7 Gt�1,LEGT4A� '� , �X9ST,IIN�i t�IAJ�E� �01.��'"��i� �� :�k�lNOE TO �CCAO.��TfdEE'� `� � , � , , , r � � � -i ' ��': ' 1 , , c � a � . � kr �, � ,� �� _ � '� ,f . _ .� , _ _ � � , . _ �� . , . � � ,. � � i � . � _ , , � _ � �, � � . . � , � i , _ ,, , v, , _. . . , � , , � � _ � . � , . . � , �;. � 0 1�lb0 � ;° ,%(�00 FE�'F' � ....... .a..,.:..... •:�• � ..:�.�, _ a. ... ai •r�ws • � � , '4�mi�a�i Rr�w�r��ri� D� . .ti � ` ' " � ° �' ' 1%2' " . 1 MILE" � , 0 � _ . � � � ! � _ , , •, �'�. i' . , . , . . , . . . , , � . � . . , . . .. , . , � , �. . . . . . , .. 1 � c p '� . , _ . ,� � .� � � �, � � , � , �• ' I, �' �� `'' . � � f. � ' �.��w.Mwwq : �wr�+r�:ww�v •r... `��1/�'�".�.."l17:y •-vvw+r+xv�.� ' � v�'•� ��'.vo :r..�.- : ' ` . . . . , ; T�►Y��s��a��r � �� '�� i� �i �.z � . �. , ; ,;�x ,O 0 ' @ ` .O "" . , �� .. , w .. . .. . ��4 . .. ... . � . .. . . . � . . . . . . , . .. . . .. . . . � , . . , . . .i .. � . .. . ... . . ��'� . f „ � �. , . , , � . � . � , . `0 � � � � _ � ', . . . ,,, � Q �� ' ` � I V�� ' ' � i 1 , �k ' <ca ` � , , ..o � , - � fi � - � , � �� ; .� . .� • � ''. � ti �� , r- . ��: . �. .. , . . . �� , �.� � .. . . . . ,� �,�� .... . .�� . .. . . . . . � , . . � . . . � ..... . . .,. ��.�� , N �� . . . . ...' ,�. . � . �� . ��. .� . . . �,.. , � . . , � . , ,. . � P , �. . . . . . . �.. Ir I. . .�'' , .�i ... , �.i. . . . . �. . . �� 1 _ . , i. � �.., .�i. � ..' 4 i -� • �/ .. ' �': I �`"Qv � � V f � II � �' �y � `�,^ti�S � � �e �,, + . . , � , r , ` �.��i�w�T� � :;' Q ' � ��wi �,, •��ms0�a+��1r��•��' N��si�r�o�di��. . ' ��'' ! e:` Q p r � � �C�' f ._.. � �. c�Q 4� NC�' l�1AK y' „ ��;� , � . � . . . @� N' +�i Q , r � � . . ....9.� °�., /� Q?.RFE.'�.�� ;r��Qh� s •,. ` � . ��.�� • �.. . O ._VAK �� /� �.+ tirtiy;.�p,�.�•rr.,+tia��t.:V.�rxtlt•:+�Y: . ti . , . . ..• µ�I' 1��t.\�•:h1W�\M'J.YLYOJNNI.Y1�'.\A.'�1NIM.'K • .� ,N�� t � ,. : �' �S" •]�yl�: �i�'� + i ! ��.� � �. PlN�{. .:a �" ,��,.. - � :;- c •v, ..�ii�.:�.� :r � ',' ; '�. ,1' a I .I +, , � �. ; , �� ,�i� .��' � �� ,�� y �' ,, 1 '��,��, 1 y � i p. .�r .� ', /�`�, �a i aa a�r i isw••� � ; �' � � � �i � i • w �� ' 1 � ' � �, � �. ' . � � , � ' , .P ,",r i, �, � . � � � �� '��,� �� '� • �� ` �� . � � . . �.I i � � . . . . .. . . ..�, , , . . . - . . . .. . � �� , .. , . . . . . . . I � � � .. . . ... .. . � .�. : .... . � . � .� , � , ^. �... �. ^. . . �', �� .., , .� ;, , . -� .. � , ` � �� e ��_ �� .�� . � � > � �. ,: y ,,, �� ,, , , i ` . � � , �� {, , � ..!. ,� ,;,,.L� ..��.�.y.��.y�.. :....�..r �. I � 1 . . . . . i- . � �� rk . .I � ��!' . i��u Y��iiii ,.. . . Y �i .. . . -... i � i � �yA. .. . C�1�VW� q � NNNC3 J�R ' '� ` � '� � � � ' ��: � i_,� y'� .� �,� �u . . �� I . ��i� �� q �`( '� . . �. . . � ��I. �I� r ,� � . . � � . . .. .�. .... .. ... .. . . ,I .� . _ . . � . . . . � . . I . ,. . � , . . .. .. .. . . .. . , I .... � ,. , . .. �I � � � I , . .. . �. . . I�� . �I � � . . . . . . . .. . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . : . I . .�� . . , .� . .. . i �� ... . . .i .., i .. . , i � I .. . ., , . . .. � . . . . . . , . � ,� I . . . . . , r � . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . � . . . . � . .. .. � . . . , i . . . i .. . . . .. � � . . ,� .��.. ., I � . . , . i . . , ... . . . .. ,. .. I . . t . i . . . . . i . I . I . L . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . , . . . , . . . ,��.I, � . , � ,. .i. . ., .� .� , , . . � �. .� . .. . . � . , , . . . . .. ,. . . � . . .. . . . . , � . . . . . . .i � . ,. . . �1 .� . .. . i . . , .. , I . � .. �. � � . . , . , . .. i , . . . � .� . , . .. .. ,. �i � � . .., . . . I t _ "�� 1 , �� ti . , .. . I . . .. . .�. . ... I . � . . G. . I�r ... �� .. .. ... . . .. , . . ... .. .. . . . . .�... 1 .. .. � . . � i . .i . . . . .. . I . . .... �i. . . � .i �. . , . . . .. . . . . � , .. �. .. i, . , . , , . . � .. .. , . . �� i.. . . ... .. .. . . .. .. .� . . . , .. . . .�a�:��. . .... � '� .� , i� . . � • ' �II I i I'� .:� I��' � � r�I� '�f � �i 1 i �zj �- i � i . i� i ,-t� . .�I _ ., I�, �.o i i � � rr r y � .. � i ��, � � I �. , �� ,1, ¢ �i,.t. ��,i. .t, � :.ri � �80 . I } METZGER t' s° -�r itlro i.o "° ��C ioo L D/ST re- e .J y:, i' l�iarai! 24s,;, s ' Tigar lanning Department Y y 1 V 7 CP]!� 89- 05 /2C 89w05 CROW OR]�GeSJ, INCA, A' , regea ®st , f c'rr a Comnpreheneive . P3 an lsa n dmant ' from Low Density T es tdential to ' Prafessio n l l Cc mercial, and. one Change from R -4.5 (IteBS dontial, ; 4.5" udite /acre) 'to ;C -'P (Professional cciaiercial) for 9 parcels. totalling :approximately` • 1.84 acres. Also, requested "ir an amendment to the Metzger- Progress 'Community Plaiv'tti revise elloni:ant of Lincoln :Street. LOCATION: ' 9220, 9260, 9330 L Locust,' 1017.5 02nd; 9225, 9255 , l4apleieaf (,WCTM 101 35A8, : taa. lots .70(1, 701, 660, 5010 600, 900, and parts of 2800 and 1002) Attached iv, the Site P�lazn and applicant. s .stifitimeut for your a risw. lroan information supplied t`ty various dspartmentsrl\ and agenci es . and 4zoii other iafoimation, available tc our staff,, a. repo>?t, arid recomsndatan will he' prepared and a dtciaton will be Zendea ed..an "the, Ipimporsal to the i a:z fr tura. If you wioh to cane' at on this appli ww' e necation, sd yr' cnts ' Apti4, 199. You zvay use the spate provided belOie, or attach a separate letter tb' return your cement*. I r .Q. JIIab1 �» 'te d: .t �d" erg please. phone the ataf # cQnti►ct nc►t®e1. below with. you I come' ents and conf iraf your P cor�meng® in wrtin +_ as noon as orsi�ble, If You have any q+aostione xegaxdfng this, matter, contact, the Tigard planning bep►artmsnt, Pd Box 23397, 13125 SW' Hall 'Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PRONE: 639•43.71. 1. � ... " .�.. STA'F CONTACT a Jeri Of f es. PLEASE CHECK THE FCLLOWIN3 , ITNi4S THAT APPL1L's We have reviowed the proposal and have no objections to Please contact of office. Please refer to the enclosed letter:` Written Comments:, None of Pernon Commenting: Phone N+ mber: --� Jtam /CPAa9 -05 . BI{M NEW ROW LINE OLD 7?)OW UNE ear Mr. Murphy: This I.ettalr is my atithovi,z1Ition or the Tranimell. Crow Company to submit n applicati_on for a,zcne change on my property front residential to professional. coalmercial. Locajcibn: 10175 S.W. 92ftd Al,reaue Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Murphy: This letter is my authorization for the ranmie ow Company to submit all applic4:tion for a ze,ne thange on my property front residential to profestEtionri" conunercial. "'- ' m s letter is my authorization for , the , Tranune] to submit an application for' a zone 'change on from residential to' profess::onal com nercial Thank .:you very much. i s 9iMtAM4( r3K�s. �' ill f�iW. MMf�i�K!/ iWA4i4�5Wi4YAYai�k�OQ !�f//i4Q+L:!9i4� � hlr��a!//O�Ns%Y /�4.//.%S4W /i /1!! � 53 ° (CR. 7 So!_ WIDTH) _ - - _ . .... s 50. ;ie0,1 .s0,.,...1,,�,y,:50 s 30 f i' 50 sB > ?00 500 f. W 400 .202 .2'.l AC. . /B AC: a 1 .69AC ' .22AC_ a 2 s 4 a (412.50) C.R. 1508- 50' WIDTH 50 '0 50 50 50 i 50 4r."-Firs--r-75--1-756--? 5� f< 30 2800 290 t t . /2AC .SAC. °o 4 $ 3 2 l Vii" t "' 4 SA4 1-1 IL!. t fETZGER` ELEMENTARY 00 IGG►.... SCHpL DISTRICT E 3�i ': r 5' i2 aI >y. �'r :$ ' ! oal r xis .4 IT: o 4 _ ... ptat 6 t t 2a c.::: '� if, 6 t ° -t 1p1 �� 'i -Q`th •Np . n T 410 21 sae 1g 7 . 10 a! 12 . 21st 96 _I00 ?3 ffl /�%ifrf% 100 = 100 422 llIS,': 100 7.93 . 9 eG, 100 100 03.05 - !0/1777 4.22 _CI Alb CON gVE ID GRENZUR TRAFFIC CONTROL Traffic signals are currently loeatred Mapieleaf d Oreenbure Road and Hwy; ,1' on a intersections are controlled by.stop'sign RAPPIC .VOLY J*!1 The traffic volumes _used in this analysis were supplied icy .'the Oregon Department of Transportation: the Phase IV .Lincoln Center Traffic Analysis dated 1987, where' data did not exist, ,ATEP conducted 'manual. turning movement counts. All, traffic ,projections were ,based on ODOT's year 2005 projections. Traffic counts taken during preparation of this report can be found in tt a Techical appendix. See Figures 2 & 3. CURRENT LEVELS OP BERV CE Level ' of Service (LOS) is ► concept that was developed to ' measure how the driver perceives the conditions surrounding them as,, the travel through, an interFection or! roadway segment. This degree of perception, inciw es suc elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impedances caused by other vehicles. As originally defined by the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual six g r - es �.x Fades are used to denote the vaxioute LOS; these x'ad are shown in Table 1. Using this definition, it is ,.general/ agreed that "D" LOS is the minimum acceptable for an urban area. .d relationship . between e assumes tionsh� purposes analysis, ... anal , sis the vehicle and th P associated tc time delay per a aa For the u Dees of hi the calculated stepped � delay � LOS t r signalized ir;tersections is given in Table' 2.' UP,asignalized i.ntersection14 require a somewhat different, approach tO determine the capacity 'of � ` ect .on. 5 Hi �� ", the inters � ,The 198 � gh {way Capacity concept " -�apacity�' as 'the ears the cQnce t of "Reserve G aet�� Manual off.:.: guideline' for measuring the capacit; Career l ' off ram c 0 er • Reserve Capacity is defined as G that port capacity that is not used ". at should be of Reserve Capacity only applies to the traffic on an approach to an intersection, f a v fable our on o noted that the ccncep individua l. movements o either in an TRANSPO ASSOCIATED "" �NGIN ,�fNNTING AT 643 u: ,490 Average overall travel speeds ° Unstable flow which includes a].inost uignal cycle failures and backups on, app the intersections. This represents the' t capacity of the facility. ;', SIGN i�rt , ra • 4 • :at .S• " _ ASSOCIATED i.."RANSI3ORTATION ENGINEER, t) 1 TABi 5 = 1131,IgTING::LNVELB OF SERVICE Ag , CRX"TaCllh' asiTzit8ECTIOE LOS Saturation RegerYe, Ali P Value C tppacity Intersectiox Greenburg Rd & Locust , ;Are. Greenburg Rd & c 1.0 6 South ramp 217 Greenburg Rd & " 91% North ramp 217. Greenburg Rd St 89% Mapleleaf I , Hall Blvd & A 252 Oak St. ** indicates left turn from Locust to G r eenbur g is at SOS E , all other movements operate at level .. ,. P o f service C or betted.. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT For the purposes of this report, the delPeiojampnt consists 1250000 square feet of General Office- While it 4ls appropriate to pa trip g pace thy. ��era1��, tri generation rates for the ent ire Lincoln center development which would produce a lower overall trip generation rate this analysis Will be r ... y basf�d on the addition of just 125,000 . y creating g ._.case square feet of general office thereb. creatin a w•'s 0 EIcwario, The develo went a' ....... ' p s proposed is to be b�ilt� in one phase and w commence in the spring of 1989. . to halve three' ' j) ways loom The development Proposes ee � , dac�vew , o n Locust ; Ave and one t ) driveway from tare realigned 93rd Street . ASSOCIM ED TRANSPOPVAtIO N ENGINEERXNG I &, PLN N N�E (A EP) PAGE 1 ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION EtiGINEEkiN • h � ■ �1!RO�'BCTED TRIP GFNER TION 1 Size of Land ` Use Daily Land Use GSF (A) Volumes Total In Out wpm ----_w -. ww .w�.e'' wwwwo .wwwww Alr SDIIIVELC11 i Generateid Trip.`, P M Peak Maur -------------------------- Office :NOTES: A. GSF 125, 000 1, 622 237 ross square feet B. Includes both irnbourd and outbound trips ror the purposes of thi;4' analysis. it Is assumed fed that', . ID.QM of the office- related person trips will be made by mass transit. This assumption ignores the Metro e s 'most recent projection; that 4 -6 percent of all 'home based person trips purposes', unrelated to work will be made by transit. Therefore, this af. ,sumption';tends to cause the analysis to, reflect a worst -case condition,, and overestimate the traffic impacts associated with this development. This zone change would actually reduce the number of trips that can be generated by this development.' If the zone change pees not take place, the development could still deve,Lop with the building of a 125, 000 square foot office building and the existing area with a density of 4.5 units A o_ r acre c bb d remain generating an additional 60 tri s per ,day. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The distribution of generated trips onto the :roadway system w. tiro the site area was based on the assumptions outlined in ' the Greenburg Locust .. Oak Commercial District Traffic Analysis dated July 1981 and the Metzger - Progress Circulation Study 1984.-1985. This trip distributign was used to develop, thy+ site gene .ted p y a str1 tr�df f is for the specific is dr3vewa a�ld! street �i buts, gins , :Y ASSOCIATED ED TRANSPORTATION FN G r 1EE TiING t PLANNING (AT EP E • In order to determine tie surrounding 0trest : Eystam, : t development must :; be` distribut analyzed for any deficincy: a t ®�a1. onto: is mos critic ersec; TiBLE LS OF SERVICE AT CRITICAL INTERBECTIO TOTAL TRAFFYC Greenberg Rd & B F Locust :Ave Greenburg Rd & C F 109% South ramp 217 ** indicates s .eft turn from > Locust to Greenberg is at P o her movements o erate at level C or better A comparison of "Table 5 and Table 7 indicate that the development will have a p p oci m3t ely 3 %irpact or an o the surrounding street system. ASSOCIATED 1T 1SPORTATION ENGINE''RING LANN CNG PAG 1 This assumption is 1' rrgely ..due, to the exist3.ng con di on$a�, at )th'E Hwy r 217 off ramps'. These raamps' " op era t�� ' at level ' of s.�r�i a "E "and "F" during the pm peak hour and tl /a a3di: tion of approx:%ratelj Vehicles during this period does x of lower the operat ng eapacit of Either intersection.' It was assume' ' for, ,'the, u' ores of thi`y report," that the ..traffic signals '.along this section of Greenbur., Road are not interconnected and these intersections :. o =erate isolates. inters.�ctions. :.?STEP used the Passer. II-84; (Progressive' AnalYsis..Fan,d s rn'1 g yS e !valuation Routine)„ traffic signal analysis program produced hit Texas ransporta =*,, �n Institute ' o rev ew the' ex sst .ng > traffic signals along Gruen' Burg Road i• b 82 The existing traffic; signals are currently runna.��g etwea a second and a 90 ssecond . signal r timing during the . p peak hour. Fl As can be FA from Table 7,1 several of these interseOt�ion operate with a i ©w level o_ service dur . § ��in the � m peak hour. The Passer II-84 runs conducted by •A'1'2P indicated that a 110. socond cycle tended to Provide the best tim$;,M plan for the system The Passer program tends to discount thy: green time for s :de , Strieet traffic and gives the majority of greo=:n time to the arteria'a Progression. This moves traffic along the 'arterial but a lds more delay to 'the side streets. This 'cype' of analysis indicates that: all three traffic signals could be iic terconn ected' and coordinated to provide progression along GAeenbisie i Road during the J Pm peak hour. See Appendix D for analysis of interconnected traffic signals an time space diagram. STACEIES DISTANCE REQUIREMENT' In conducting the capacity calculations, the eta;�K king. distari s' ns were calculated ' by u requited, .red f ®r the crxta.a ��" � . � .. . qu al Ynt4,.rsectio se o arrivals' on red p are ssui aari,„ . „ statistical robabilit of arr and Table s: A'ASOC _ ... T Ike H ERIRG & PLANN ''" IATE� TRArTSP�iRrATION ENO ATEP) 'PAIGE t tt 1 1 f' i TACxING TABLE. ;S> DISTANCE REOUI' Total Traffic' Peak hour ''stacking distances required by n�ersrction I Greenburg Rd Greenburg Rd Greenbuig Pd Greenburg Rd Greenburg Rd in ereecti ovement Stack] & Mapleleaf NB LT & Mapleleaf WB LT & NtRamp - 217 SB:.through SRamp ,217 B through & S'Ramp 217 SB LT SAFETY ('CONSIDERATIONS nq, D1 ta:n, 5''' 8'I 6''" The overall traffic pattern for the Lincoln Cen, \ter development consists of wide swings in traffic volumes betweeil the am and the "x pm peak traffic counts. Traffic during the am peak enters the site from 'Oak,"' Mapleleaf anc Locust Ave and LI pretty evenly divided' among the Three entrant points. During the pm peak the majority of the traffic exiting th��, site uses Mapleleaf dx: ive due to the signal locate ,at Zreenburg`'; Road. This concentration of traffic at the Mapleleaf intersection s . directly due to the large volumes of vehicles on Greenburg Road and vehicles wanting to make a left turn frol m Lincoln Center er onto Greenburg Rd. _ rt g Gap studies taken �auri ,the preparation of the Phase IV { traffic report indicates that adequate gaps do exist for ' s v ehicies e. sting Locust Ave . an1�o Gr eenbur g Road. T his indicate:that while thae left turns from Locust Ave. operate at a 'lev el of to a reserve capacity of -9 during the pm peak .]hour,. those .left ;turns have adequate time to make the left turn safel y i RAFFX C 5IGEAt WARRANT As part of this analysis, the unsignalized 1 intersection ,located,' Greenburg Rd and Locust Street was invGatigated for traffic signal �` i ASSOCIATED .�'^" NSPORTATIO i ENGINEERING &' PL ,KING ��,�TE ' � PAGE 2 . A The site 'dlistributian dicates, $;n; ' Ol'1 a G �� ssturatio>n le�rea will increase the 41f �k',, approximately three (3 percent This 'smal:l; p, will not 'adversely, affect. 'the; ��urrounding st "wee, The intersection of Pre`.enhurq' Ro sa and r cUst r � one i of the , 'a rants required for s; d: instal. traf f is signal and should be ilinvfssr�tigated `1 by additional ' warrant ' s tudies. The 4 existin ramp signals on Greenbur�;� � are currently interconnected and opera' cycle during the pm peak hour. Passer II -84 rnns indica Mapleleaf inter section to t1 Road could reduce the dela ODOT is currently review $ 7 H at 2 Z " Greenberg Road � �� _ some of the congestion created at. POl� 1N F GINERRi PI ING, .(AT AssoOIATEA TRANS TATr !o' ensure the � a� ►nd e ede tr ans wit ins he area;; mproveicents are recoamended 'existing signal me r section remai Yams The proposed 93rd ;, ,. Y�:D. cor st ct .o�n additional access to t4 e site " firom t :e so include : the , reaiign yet cif 93rd St. accommodate the. propose areas. s he existi ng sig al at Greenberg Roa Mai with reviewed for interconnecon sigr�aJ.s , , .e intersection of ,.us t and''l. restriped to provide a le €t an r Lot , Street traffic. ASSOCIATED SPORT /AIM ENGINEERa4 1-' co marl ILI -- SIGNALIIED HNTERSE T ON' SIGCAP VEP5(21jan87) ,INTERSECTION: •TIGARD; "6REEN3UR6; AND NAPLE , VOiUMES: AN PEAK � 'ETRQ 6021 20, 111 TO !00,100 A9ALYST: DICK HOELK4jr !PHASE :!PHASE !PHASE '!PRASE . !PHASE .!PHASE ! •C= * SERVICE LEVEL:.' 8 'SA" /URATISN`: 552 f ' APPROACH '.LANE GEOMETRY SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST r LANE ! MOVE WIp71 ;'- ''�IOVE WIDTH 'HOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ' ! T. 12.8 RT. i 12.1 R... 112.0 R7L 12.1) 2:,' ! LT. 12•0 • T.• 12.0.' L'1.' 12.0 �,;. 12.1 3 ! L.. 12.1' L. 12.1 ... .l ... MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LDS !' APPR ! LT 'TH HT TOT ! LT :' '',TH '' ,,RT . ! IT TH RT ,! SOUTH ! 1 ?Al.' 135 570 ! 262 552 552 ! A NORTH''! 35 378 10 415 ! 152', 552 5521 A WEST ! 5 10 35 50 1 222 222 '''26%', A EAST ! 48 5 5 50 1.. 262 ° 262; 262 ! r1, A A APPR! IRKS! !X- HLK!PEOS? ----!-----! , ! - ---. S!5.02! ! 5 N!512! ! N W!5.02! ! W E ! 5.1%! ! E '. 4 � 1N /5- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)! !E /N- DIRECTION SEPARATION QC -4)! APPROACH ,VAC VALUES" HOVE ! SOUTH NORTH NEST EAST 1 i LTP .1056 1001 .0100'; 019 TR ! .1319 1156 :1110 .1053 ! IT ! .1806 011( .0083 .0125 R ! .1750 1156 .0194 .1028 R -AD.' ! .1000 0000 .11144 - 0Pea ! T ± .1944 1028 .0056 .0028 L ! .0313 0201 .1ic29 .0128 ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL iSECS)! HOVE 't1ORAGE LEO, 1 At 105 C ! APPR ! LT In RT 1 L1 T19 RT yy! r-r L -r 1, 1L'r- 1 r ■- ■-r - ---- -- r-rw - r- .:r- -. SOUTH ! 0 ! BOOTH ! 26.3 26.3 26.3 ! ' HI *a ' NORTH 1 it ! NORTH ! 21.1 31.1 21.1 ! 34. ,'182 0 ! 1iEliT ! 0 ! WEST 1 13,3 1 '3,, 3 39.16'1 0 16 EnST ! 0 ! EAST ! 13.3 10'.111 'H 9�a = 'ALCIATE MANUALLT' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION d SI8CAP VERS(21;jan INTERSECTION. ' TIG�1RD <6REENBURGIND NAPLELEAI VOLUMES :,, " EXISTING PM PEAK''' METRO SIZEt, 20,680 To i�8 +B�00 !PHASE !PHASE `!PHASE !PHA9,'E !PHASt..!PHASE LANE ! MOVE WIDTH ! R . 1210 LT. 12.e 12 ►8 APPR 'SiiUTH' ;i' NORTH ,! WEST ! 34 9 EAST • 698 22 SATURATION '85% APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY NORTH „WEST EAST .. HOVE MIDTH MOVE WIDTH IM0VCi 11111T 'd RT. -- �12.8 R.. 12.0 RTL 12.8 T.. 12.0 R.. ▪ 12.8 LT. 12.8. M1 I MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! LT TH RT TOT ! LT TH , RT ! LT TH RT !, 16 11188 ! 85% 857, 85% ! D -E D -E D-E ! APPR! - t IRKS! Imo-!- -! �s S ! 2.11pp7! N ! 2.8X! N ' 2.11%! ' E ! 2.8%!' 28 695 ! .19X 85% 85X ! A i'04 0 -E 491 534 ! 28X 28X 85% ! A ' A O -E 44 764 ! 85% 25X 25% ! 0- !N /S- DIRECTION SEPARATION' (C -4)! !E /H- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)!' MOVE ! SOUTH ! LTR ! .1667 TR .141!'6 LT ! .1637 R ! .86st -ADJ! .8881 T ! .1361 L l .16€3 LEG VOLUME LEG ! AT LOS C - t t SOUTH, NORTH ! 1t NEST ! S EAST ! a: APPROAC! ViC VALUES NORTH WEST EAST . 80011 .000! .;1122 . 1864 111811 .0367 :i0m0 .8239 .2008 .0156 .1515 ; .1244 .811111` .1179 .830 ,1786 .1050` .1122 .1138 I.0115 .0,229 ! TIME AVAIL ISECBI! MOVE, STORAGE ►PPR ! LT TH RT ! L,T TH RT ! t a SOUTH ! 27.2 27.2 21.2 ! e1# NORTH ! 27.2 27.2 27,2 ! 31 433 M WEST ! 17.2 1�7.2' 44.4 ! 61 '258 EAST ! 32:5 32.5 `,32.5 ' CALCULATE MA UA1LV ' - -SiGNALIZED IMTERSECTIOE - ;SIB AP - VERS(,,21 :janR71' IP TERSECTINN: ` T,IGARD, 6REENBUR6 AND ` #APLELEI ` VOLUMES: EX:ISXYNf6� PM, PEAK METRO SIZE`:; 20' 000 TO 100 0 086, ANALY r !PHASE !PHASE >'! PHASE.,'! PHRASE !PHASE !PHASE ! I. I ro.r__,„.1 'SERVICE LEVEL * SATURATION . ' 89% APPROACH'LANE GEOMETRY., SOUTH NORTH NEST EA 5T '. LANE NOVA MOVE WIDTH MOVE HIDTH , lrVE NIDT 0 , , I . 1 ! RT. 12.0 T: 12.8 12.0 RTL 12.0 2 'x ! LT.' 12.0 T.. 1Z.0 L 12.0 L. , ' 12. e' 3 ! LI: 12.0 1.. 12.0 LT: 12.0 ... .0 MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! (MOVEMENT LOS_ APPR ! LT TH 'RT TOT ! LT TH .RT ! LT , TH RT'' SOUTH ! 502 490 16 1008 ! 49% 89% $9X ! E NORTH,! 24 643 28 695 ! 23% $9X 89X ! -A E. E WEST ° 34 9 491 534 ! 32% 32% 89X ! A EAST ! 698 22 44 764 ! 09% 30% 30% ! E: APPR! TRRS! !X- NLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING _ .. I ! ! d_�- I 1---- c S ! 2.9%! ! 6 ! N ! 2.0%! ° N ! ! !N /S- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)!,' N ! 2.1%! ! W ! ! !E /H- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)t E,2.0%! Y 1 r R APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ° I SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST °. LTR !' :1867 .0000 .0100 x`2:22 ,! TR ! ,1406 .1864 .8000 .0367 LT ! .1837 M .0800' .8239 .2880 ! R ! .009 .015E .1515 .0244 R -AD.`. .0000 .0000` .1198 .0000 T ! .L361 .1786 .0050 .0122„ ` L ! :1693 .0138 .8195 .2229 LEG VOLUME ! ! TIi,E &iVAII. (SECS)1 HOVE' STDRA6E ! LEG ! At 'LOS t ! APPR ! LT :TH RT ! LT TH ART ! SOUTH ! ® ', SOUTO 19.11 19.3 19.3 1.: :Ot 4 *# 0 MURTHA NORTH ! 19.3 19:3! 24 335 0 I WEST ! 0 i EST ? 1,2.4 12x. 31 x 7 ! 0 46 199 ! i EAST 4 E CALCULATE �9AC�13ALL r' TIM' 17' ****N * »*fir* * * ** APPF 1DAr.:H ..LAMS 8EOM5T�'V r•' SOUTH W T E' ST MOVE W MOVE J I JET NAVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH I IF 4' r.,.jr ...i.i�....r.NV. -+. w.M'•o ....w.. rj..... rw.. �:.. .r �h.r y..... ri,.i ...how. �iw..... .+-..ti.. .w..bw rw:wwr�.u.�+w«rw �± 1 ■,,e 126 s• MOVEMENT VOL�..UME3 � AP PR TH RT TOT SOUTH 205 42r 0 630 NORT H I ! . O 320 1.10 430 WEST ! 0 0 EAST , 120 0 325 ` 455 APPR ! TRKS ! ! X -WLK' ! PIE OS _ NO ! S ! ....I.0%! r N ! 5.0Y. W ! iii.! py� o � E ! 5.07. ►" . MOVE SATURATION T1 1T N/S A I RECT I ON SEPARATION ! E /W—D T 'ECT I Oiv' SEPARATION w.w... 1 w....- .- »..:..r- M LEG VOLUME SOUTH ! 890 NORTH ! 973 WEST ! 260 EAST 375 APPROACH , V/C VALUES NO! >TH WEST AST .0611 .0000 1806 ! . 0000 .0000 /539 a 08a J . 0000 0000 . 0000 .0000 0747 TIME AVAIL (SECS) ! ?1CaVE STORA APP1 ! iT TAI PT LT TH sr4.44, 44.4.4 4YIY44w.i. -. �'.:�nl wii lw Lilrr�ii �a.+M e.1 i.�'1 Pi ■ SOUTH ! 88.5 . ! 0 NORTH -1 . 14. 14. . ! 168 �>> WEST EAST ! 25. SOUTH 'NORTH, WEST MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE 'W I DT rJ.• . w..:«.•.•.... w. �.. i. �.•.ii....irra..i..�Vwrrwr.�.iw wo an.w'iwu«wr.e 4ir ..i.r�.:ww iw.•w.i q«irr.....« EA ST: MOVE, WID MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION 1. Mt3V'c ME•l�9Y', " AP'P'P ! LT TH RT TOT ! L `T T AT .w. -r ..•. .w -4w r.1 I ww «w .,.. r.. r.l;r w�I. i.r '....... wwi .... w..: I ... ..+�..w.1...L..,•rj.w.::._1,... r^i «.r «w w.:..i w. I .r`w......'«..W1wr(.:t:.....r wr:�'wii .•....i: :.u.. �.i x SO U 205 4 2 NORTH . 1152 42X0 71 6a97 47% 07. S1 WESTs a � 7. • EAST a® 504 709 647 7 917 . TREK S ! ! X'-WLK ! PEDS? NO! 1 1 ,,...........• I ,... ! W/ S -DD I P ECT I ON SEPARATION lE / W -D I RECT1 ON APPROACH ' V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH FORTH WEST EAST • ...wrwr rY�w..dr" "� . hie.......l..i1:w•�....—rW -- rrwr ':tirr..rr w wrY ww! R ! .14000 .,,',213E0.. 4'0000 . 2800 R —ADJ. ! e 0000 H .0000 •0000 . ^ . 18 .1 " 'r T ! a 2738 . 3200 . ;0000 . 0000 L ! e 1 178 .0000 .0000 117 It LEG VOLUME. ! ;! TIME AVAIL LEG ! AT LOS C APPR OAT i'hl "t!'i" SOUTH i 694 SOUTH ' 27.5 NORTH ! 2126 ! NORTH H !' e i fir`» . a e WEST ! 523 1 WEST ! ' EAST ! 585 ! EAST ,,„t MOVE STlRA( ■ ' a .....,,,......i...........,1 OW, 0,00 ,... 4e4ei ,,, V„,.....,...4... g.......M.,",1,' ...,....,i'O'FO4.0.....0000 I O.W.',........."... '1, ," .■ * 3t.41.4*44.* .3.1f..,81., . * '' ' 44.' :. '4, , ,4 ,rf., ,., ,.,,..: , ,,, ,, , : .! ' . :, ,!'' , ''-, ', +-,•H ! , ' - ,H.,:,,' i ,'-, , ' :. ,, ,.:. :'• 4: L ' ' ' 'I ■ „ ) ■ APPRIJAC14. LANEitl'Er OMET. 1,7,;y:r NORT,F! ' , ,, - ''' r,'"' : , ' WEST ,rr,' .,i'', ,. ' ,, '' ,',,,, :' ' ,EAST illaVE' 'P‘I I DT".1 ' '',' ' : '',' '' MOVE WIDTH ',, ., ',MOVE ' W I OTK, ---..--,,,--7•-•''",""""""""•r-'""""7-",-",'""---""'"'"","'!"."7-7--7-7--, ,r,,,,,,, „. , ,. , , , , , , 1 ', .' ',N.Iir ' 12.0 ' ',' ,-ro, 'h ,l..):ATr ',, , ' ',O.e 6: ' 1 ;:,42 o' te, '' ::, :: -' '''' eLL. : ' . ,, .*I:a 2, 'r: ' ! T.H.,- ,, 12401 ', '',''' L.,. 12.0 : -' ' ''LT-...-•'r ,,, r':124.0 iV' SOUTH LANE MOVE WIDTH MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE 1SATUAT I ON ! MOVEMENT LOS ! AE'PR LT TH RT TOT ! LT TH ' RT ! LT TH 1;:T ! eMOW 66.1*..11■04 •••••••••• 404,1 YOMANOINI 0.1,./.• OW. NW. SOUTH ! 0 440 245 685. ! 07. 66%, 42%. ! ' • C A ! NORTH ! 145 305 0 450 ! ' 287. 667. 07. ! ' A C WEST 190 0 235 425 ! 66'C. 0°/f. 527.! C . B ! EAST 0 0 0 ! 0%, 0% 07. ! APPR ! ! ! X-WLK ! , NO ! ! PHASING 11, 11 ,1 S ! 5407. ! ! S ! N ! 5.07.! N ! !'N/S'-DIRECTION SEPARATION ! W 1 5 0% ! , E/W-D IRECT I ON' SEPARATION ,(C-4 )! E ! E APPROACH V / C VALUES' MOVE SOUTH NORTH , R 66.1 .66,6 woo Ye. «ow who ! gr. 6.46. low: tor 6666 0.11 01.111. W4411, EWO.. SOM'S T 6666 rob.. , EAST m. m6 6 1 S 1361 . 0000 1306 ' .0000 R -AL)J ! . 0000 .0000 , . 08/7 .0000 T 2444 . 1694 • 0000 . 0000 ! 0000 .0463 .1092 .0000 ! LEG VOLUME ! : TIME' AVAIL. (SECS)' 'MOVE STORA LEG !' AT LOS C: APPR ° LT I., H. ART LT,, .RT 6.6 1 as. 40666 666. :646 1.61 66. 4,4 hyo..,1■41 6a• mow ow. Mo. M. .1.0 ....M. 0NO■ 1, 4. It'aa SOUTH 1011 SOUTH 0 36.5 36.5 ! 0 327 182 NORTH 892 NCP-t."H ! 25.3 25.3 65 '274 0 ! WEST 851 WEEST ! 16.3 0 527 i! 0 0 122 EAST 322 EAST ! • 0 1.0 '. ! 0 0 ▪ 12« r.. MOVEMENT AF'F'IL: ! LT TH SOUTH ! 0 485 NORTH ! 609 786 WEST r 425 0. EAST VOLUMES ! MOVE ET TOT 4; LT 11 5 600 1. 07. 106% 1345„'! 57 %, 1067' 245 67' II! 106. y SATU.lF :)A1I ON TH •" CST 35% APF'R ! TRKS ! .w* .... • 9 r 5.0 IYM N .r 5.0!.! W ! ..a p r0 :: . E ! .0 %! ! ! X- WL14:: ! F'E'D ? NO! ! N f S-- DIRECTION 'SEPARATION E /W-- DIRECTION SEPARATION .°638 , .00.00 T r .2694 L .0000 LEG VC3LlilvIE 1..E0 ".. AT LOS C APPROACH `i / C VALAJES 'NORM .0000 ..1C. 0000 ' .1011 .4°89 .0000, r 1944 .2443 SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST EGIUTH ,,I! PIQI TH 1 WEST EAST r TORAGE LENGTHS! ! NOT ` RELIABLE AT !THIS LEVEL OF ! !DERVICE • »- -- I ZED I NTERSE! p; TERS5, ,f 1. Oi e T,I SAPD' : :SPEE NE4 J ° a AND wV 217 $P � VOL LIMES METRO "'`S I Z 20,0J0 , .TO `1 f;Cll., X00 Aar $'kASE L f E ! M(V WIQTH. P.PRQAL *1 L.. IVf �. G OPIET1.1.. 11{w'Yr'7 H ' WEST MOVE..t 01 pt 1' OV ,'WIDTI, 12.0 R ... APPROACH ' /C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST . EAST _ 1 MOVEMENT ,.VOLU J MES ? MOVE''" SATi �,'° T 7 JN' APT s LT TH RT TOT ! LT TH RT irw ww rµ r•r �'+^ i Ww ««r rr. r1. /w« ..w r.. r..i ! ..w F.r/owr., rwl wwf a..w wri SOUTH • _0, 4O 5M r 115 « 600 ! 0% 1 r?2% $ .. , iinl.�iF:TH., ! 6 % a0 1 1345 ! 54% 1 tat 0'/ i w .. WEST 42;:t 0 :� ` 670 ! 1027 0Y. S% EAST 1 (j 0 0 0 ! 0i 0;,. % ,AP'P`R! TP:F' " ";n ! 1 X —WI ! PEDS' NO'. ! PHASING a �,! t.l. 0/i N 1 , 5 o 0% 1 Y 0� ,/ � � �I �E�T SEPAR 7 W .0% ! / W`D I RE' DT h, Q I ON EPARA`i ! E E , •••• or* . w. w.:.+ ka r row r.... r,".. r.l...:..w.uw-- --- w..w�.r«.:... .: rw.rr.r ✓� 0E '� .0000 1361 �4 d�00 -A f,J ! . 0000 .0000 1,00 00C 0 . 1 ± �, �� . 408 . 00 09`d it � L ! 0000 4 LEG VOLUME TIME AVA I' L t8EtS A �� j , LT LEG AT �..L?S 1... . ..,,...:■ r..,�s .,x mew .4••• ••••■••••••r..••• �rr .r.rr...�....,wr.:...~_..::.. 1 ......rr.w�r..r.r ... , SC1l.i`C'rl I i �04 ! SOUTH 0 1 a 31 5 !. TS NORTH ! 1 3 IOP'.'TH " .0 !; IL "i EL.IA +L 0 G0 1 ! Th I WESC` WEST ,,..cc.. rLEL EAs`r 497 /18I6NALTZED INT RSECT DN CAPACT`IV'CALCULATION FORM 4-11A i INTERSEC1 ION CITY: TIGARD INTERSECTION: 6REENBURG AND LOCUST ALTERNATE E ISTtNi TRAFFIC COUNT: AtI PEAK LOCATION PLAN: ANALYST: DICK 110ELK METRD SIZE: 28, m40 TO 1'41, 088 TYPE OF CONTROL: STOP APPROACH CODES ARE D LANE 1 2 3 4 GRADE= .8X1 A 4 2 3 D 4 2 3 1 1 GRADE= .8 C SPEED: 35 HPH RESTRICTED SIGHT CODE IS 1 MINOR STREET ADJUSTPIENTS ACCELERATION LANE? NO CURB RADIUS DR TURN ANGLE? NO MOVE AL1 AT1 Alit 1 BL 8T1DR 1 CL1 CT1CR1 DL1 DT'1DR VOL 1 51 2951 581 791 3351 51 751 01 25.1 51 01 51 1 PC11 1 61 1 1 771 1 1 831 81 281 61 01 6 LANES O 3 1 X11 STEP 1 RIGHT TURN FROM CID CR DR CONFL':ICTING FrLONS = NH = 328. 338. YPN CRITICAL GAP = T6 = 5.6 5,8 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = 1,11 = 865. 849. PCH DEMAND = 28 6 PCH CAPACITY USED = 3.237 787 % IMPEDANCE FACTOR = .379 .996 SHARED LANE — SEE STEP 3 NO SHARED LANE — RESERVE _ 0. 0. PCH DELAY & LOS = N/A NIA STEP 2 — LEFT TURNS FROM 8/A 8L AL CONFLICTING FLOWS = AN = 345. 340E 1F11 CRYTICAL GAP = TG = 5.8 5.0 SECS POTENTIAL CA PAGITY' = 112 = 842e 947. PCH DEMAND = 77 6 PCH CAPACITY USED = 9.14 .71 1; IMPEDANCE FACTOR = .937 .99E AVAILABLE RESERVE = 765. 941. PCI DELAY & LOS = A EP. 3 'HRU tNOVEMENT FROM 'C CI NFL ICT IH6 FL,Co;9i '' CRITICAL, 6AP �i�' T6 �" POTENTIAL CAPACITY 6M3 =... 369 IIIPE'DANC ` AD U THEN II3 363;..' DEMAND° = 3' CAPACITY USED .33 IIIPEAANCE ° FACTOR ` = P3 ,1.301°° N11 SHARED LANE , AVAILABLE RESERVE= DELAY & LOS = Nly" SNARED LANE WITH LEFT TURN - FEE STEP '4 SHARED .ANE DEMAND = 0 PCH POTENTIAL CAPACITY = Pi13 _ . PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE = 9. PCH DELAY & LOS. = iN /A N/ .n.iwdr-.rr war- ..rr— .......... r ..i ..„..ir -r r..a.r--r.. ---,. ... STEP 4 - LEFT TERN FFOI1 CID ' L DL CONFLICTING FLOtiS =' HH '/43. 783'. VPH CRITICAL 6AP = T6 = f,O 6.8 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = hN 386. 363. PCH ADJUST FOR IMPEDANCE: 359. 33'2. PCH 8 NO SHARED LANE DEMAND = 3 PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0. ' ,3. PCH DELAY & LOS = N/A NIA V1TH LEFT & THRU SHARED LANE DEN AND = 3 da PCH CAPACITY OF SHARED LAHL - 0. 0. PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE _ I. 0. PGH DELAY & LS = N/A , 14/A KITH LEFT, THRU, & RIGHT SHARED LANE DEMAND W — 111 12 PCH CAPACITY OF SHARED LANE = 417. 429. PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE = 306. 417. PCH DELAY & 105 = A LOS' C VOLUMES. VEHICLES; PER.HDUR FOR LEG C FOR LE6 D 261. 366. }r --Wn. Marra .. ".n.inLa—......a....araa�r .. I$16NALIZED, INTERSECTION' CAPACITY CALCINATION F 4-110 INTERSECTION CITYI TIGARD= ANALYST: DICK NOEL IP1TE1, ,a'EG� ION`. 6REENBURG AND. LOCUST llLti.aNArE :,EXISTING TRAFFIC' METRO :SIZE: 28,830 TO 100 000 COUNT: PH PEAK TYPE. OF CONTROL: STOP ,,,(LOCATION PLAN: i • � APPROACH CODES ARE D LANE ;1, 2 3 4 6R /ADE: .0/1 A' 4 2 3 2 3 1 GRADE= .O r ∎ +rwww-,urwrr SPEED: , 35 MPH L ESTRItTED SIGHT CODE IS 1 '1111°10k STREET ADJUSTMENTS ACCELERATION LANE? NO 'CURD 'RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE? NO 'airw+rw- rsrwr:�rw +r �- rrrrwrrrrr "rrr. MOVE ,' I AL 1 AT 1 AR 1 DI :1 BT 1 BR 1 CL 1 CT'' 1 CR 1 1 DT 1,DR VOL 101 4711 451 451 5291 151 1051 61 501 201 51 301 1' PCP 1 111 501 1 I 1161 71 551 ; 221 61 331 1!�LANES 3 3. 1 1 STEP 1 RIGHT TURN 'FROM Ci'D CR DR CONFLICTING FLANS : NH = 494. 537. VPH CRITICAL GAP : TG _ 5.0 5.0 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = 111 = 717. 683. PCH DEMAND: 55 33 PCH CAPACITY �I. r N,,�ED 7.673 4.828 II IMPEDANCE FACTOR = .946 .968 SHARED LANE - SEE STET' 3 NQ SHARED LANE - RESERVE : 0. 0. PCH DELAY & LOS' = N/A NIA 44 r Ywrwwr ".�lsiswwYl, STEP 2 - LL'FT TURNS FROM BIB BL AL CONFLICTING riOIIS = NI# = OIS'. 544. VP y CRITICAL GAP = T6 = 5.0 5.0 VJECS PDTENTIAL CAPACITY W fl2 ' 593. 670. . C1i DENAND = 50 11 PCN CAPACITY USED = 7;15 1 1.62 IMPEDANCE FACTOR = .952' .990 AVAILABLE RESERVE > E V E - R 649. 66.1. PC11 DELAY ft LAS ,NO' SNARED LANE IVtILASLE.RESERVE= DELAY SF ARED 1I.ANE`UITH LEFT TURN SHARED LANE DEMAil POTENTIAL CAPACITY, = M1a uc A LA9 E AI � 'R S RV�r ,F � RE SE DELAY -& LOS STEP 4 - LEFT TURN FROM C►`?!! " CDNFLITIN6 FLOWS CRITICAL SAP ;= Ta POTENTIAL CAPACITY = t4' ADJUST FOR IMPEDANCE; NO SHARED LANE DEMAND AVAILABLE RESERVE r= DELAY & LOS 1164. .VP ! 6.5 ` SECS 299. PCH 193. PCH PC4 °un WITH LEFT & THRU SHARED LANE DEMAND _ 8 5 PCH CAPACITY OF 'SHARED' LANE = 8. ; 9. P^V, AVAILABLE RESERVE = . N. P'11 DELAY & LOS '= N/9 HFA IITH LEFTY THRU, & RIGHT' SHARED LAME 'DEMAyu = 178 61 PCH CAPACITY OF SHARED` LANE = 256. i 318' PEE! /AVAILABLE R1 SERVE six ��78. 249. P41. :' DELAY & LOS = E ...:...: :, "4i .. ,,, •.. .i�r�4.4.' �,iii.4�wiJrrrr'�1.rri41 LOS C VOLUMES: VEHICLES PER HOUR FOR LEG D 466 w{:miiir,,il:i+ '91,6 .L zED INTER I TY.: TIr'AI�D''. ". INTEPSECTI©hla HALL BLVD AND ALTEF :HATE w EXIST' I NG COUNT: PM F~EAK LOCATION FLAN: APr 1:OAr H CODES AR ' LANE 1 2 3 4 2 ONTRO' 'OF:ry,DEw.. r 141r�a 1 SPEED ,''.,."-r MPH RESTRICTED SIGHT GHT CODE IS 1 MINOR STREET ADJUSTMENTS -- ACCELERATION LANE? NO CURB RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE? 1 AFF'Fr 1 A 1 1 AL AT 1 A, .. L , i,T .MOVE � � � �, � S � � ! 1 L�F� 1 CL C:T � � 1 � �F �' �� DL . DT.. � D► 1 VOL 1 111, 441 1 47 35 t 4861 301 201 361 971 O01. 224 Girt 1 1 FC:M' 121 1 1 21 4 1 ] 07 _ 331 241 -681 1 LANES 1 1 1 1 1' 1 MOO wei 6016 era a. STEP 1 RIGHT TURN FROM C %IDF~; DR C:ONFL I C:T I NS FLOWS = MH =� 465. 5m 1 a 1�," H CRITICAL. GAF' 2 TG = 5. 5.0 SECS POTENTIAL CAPAt I TY. = 11 A 740. f ' 11 L , PCH DEMAND = 107 61'3 PCL4 CAPACITY USED = 14.460 9.5 6 Y. IMPEDANCE FACTOR = .: 8 SHARED LANE -- S EE STEP ;,, NO S AR H �a LANE -- RESERVE = 0. �� :.`F'`'' r � DELAY & LOS, = rY�»i:•w«w ......waw...w..,rr.«a..a +•••• •••wrf..»�••i«..+...».- w..:. -r' :i..:. i.- .. ir..: 1w... w... wi. w.: rirw Y+.. Lw. l.. w-. �w... rw... w.i. arwrwr. w.. rsu.. ir�wdr. r.»• w, brar ".`.w....r"i.wL.r:.w+.:...i.�w r.. w.r L4w;rwiwY o: STEP 2 - LEFT TUP VS FROM 8/i 8/iN 13 CONFLICTING FLOWS 't H = 488. CRITICAL t3AP = Tr 4.5 F" OTEIV 814. TIAL OAF'�1GITY =' 1"i DEMAND = ;35 CAPACITY USE* = 4.7 IMPEDANCE FACTOR = . 6" AVAILADLE RESERVE j 775. DELAY 94 LOS = A' **I •■■•■ .004 Y. NO 61* 41.88, 4.0 MOM .40.1 10•14 101. ,M11 .44 .64. wime • LEFT TURN FROM C/D 'L L JNFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 1111 1168. VPH C:R I T I CAL GAP = TG = c:; .5 EECS POTENTIAL C:AF'AC I TY = MI' = 288 268. PCH ADJUST F'DF! IMPEDANCE: ' 245. 210. PCH NO SHARED LANE DEMAND = AVAILABL.E RESERVE = ' DELAY .' LOS = WITH LEFT 84 THRU SHARED LANE DEMAND = 11 CAPACI TY OF SHARED LANE AVAII_ABLE RESERVE DELAY & LOS = WITH LEFT, TFIRti, if?., RIGHT SHARED LANE DEMAND = , 16S1 125 PCH k CAPACITY OF SHARED LAN[ = 463\A 377. PCH '■,, , AVA41.4ABI.E RESERVE = 294. 252. PCH DELAY & LOS = .4.rt " -• • 7Y. IGAR' TtRSEC:T I Cite: HALL '14LV L'TEP NATE: EX .I ST I NS TRAFFIC SUNT: AM PEAS' CATION : ;PLAN I I AF'F'ROAC;�-t' NCO ESS ARE 4 A 5 SPEED: 35 MPH RESTRICTED SIGHT CODE IS NOR ST' EET ADJUSTMENTS ACCELERATION LANE? NO CURE RADIUS OR , `TUP N AN:3L E? NO —M ..rr awl ,.... M� -,—, -- ,N— :wirowwwti.iuw ww.....,,yi..wi l..,,wwi.M wrr, i et e.: i, D: 15. 1..25 i '161 171 2 r ►.+M.n «.. r.irr wd lr, . RIGHT T''URN FROM C/D CONFLICTING FLOWS = H CRITICAL GAF' = T POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M1 DEMAND CAPACITY USED = IMPEDANCE FACTOR SHARED 1. ANE SEE STEP Na SHARED LANE -.. RESERVE DELAY & LOS CF.. 287. 8'96. 28 3.124 209. VPM 5 0 SECS 972. PCH 17 PCH 10749 989 N/A ... �....., M.. i... c: L....,:....,: iy.. �r.. .r��......«�.,...wW.»1..:r.�.rw `..1:..t.l:w,i :.. L...: ....:. ...: : .. «.. ul:. w..:..:...,: ,...+»...:. — LEFT TURNS FROM 8/A CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH L ~RITx�C:AL. aAP = TS `OTENT I AL CA 'ABC I 'Y = M2 ;t 1DEiAND r= C:APAC� I TY US'ED I MPEDA C�E FA `:TOR AVA I LADLE ,ESERVE DELAY' Leas VEM C TTtALraA POTENTIAL . CAPAr�:'I 1 V MFEDANC E ° A JUSTM EMAND , = ' CAPACITY IJ LD I PE: ANNE L., T'0 O S 1ARED, LANE AVAILABLE RESE V DELAY & .LOS SHARED LAi'ri `' WITH ,L,EFTT&JP E SHARED LANE �DEI Ai�4D - " PO i ::r�iT I AL tAPA�C "Y -• ' N 1 AVM+.l :AEIL'E RESERVE DELV 4. LOS - LEFT TURN F „.0M C: /1 coNFL I OTI her '`LOWS = i IH CRITICAL (AP = Ti ;,= POTENTIAL CAPAC! TY = MN ADJUST FOR IMPEDANCE u NO SHARED LANE DEMAND AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0 DELAY a ►. LoS =I /A WITH LEFT fit THRIJ SHARED LANE DEMAND = O CAPACITY OF SHARED LAND — AVAILABLE RESERVE = •: LOS A � DELAY �. WITH LEFT, HRU� . & '",HT SHARED LANE DEMAND 46 SS ' POH CAPAC I T ? OF SHARED LANE "71:9. ►10 'NCH AVAILABLE RESEPyVE = 673. .2 , E'OH DELAY A r.: LOS, C VOLUMES FFJ , i.EiC; F"O VEHICLES PER HOOK,:1 r;',* 1 APPROACH LANE•GEOMETRY ' •• SOUTH - .NORTH ' WEST EAST !, LANE !: •MOVE, WIDTH MOVE WIDTH 'MOVE WIDTH 110V H11111T • , 1' RT. 12.6 ' RT. 12.0 R.., RTL" ,12.0,.',,,,. •,,,y • , . , - 2 ! LT. 12.0 " T7. ' 12.6 ' R,. 12.1 L.. 12.0 3, '! L. _12.6 1.. 12.6 ' LT: , '12.0 ' ! ' • " -- MOVEMENT VOLUMES ' I MOVE SATURATION 1 MOVENENT LOSyl APPR ' LT *- TH RT TOTT LT 'TO RT, ! LT ' TH ' - • ' .,‘ SOUTH ! 95 342 if,12 599 ! 212 492 482 ! A A' A NORTH !I 46 381 10 437 ! 222 492 482 ! A A 'A ! • WEST ! 5 Ei 35 55 ! 212 212 19% ! A A A I! ' EAST ! 55 5 6 66 ! 262 262 262 ! A A A 1 APPR,! TR1(S! • S ! 2J2! 1'1 ! 2.6%! 4 ! 2.1% !X-111..K!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING . - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! ! 1 , ! N ! ! !N/S-OIRS'TION SEPARATION CC-4)! ! t4 ! ! !E/M -DIRECTION SEPARATION , (C-4)! APpR9ACN WC VALUES ! MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH NEST EAST ! ------------------- , LT8 ! .1188 .0160 .groa .mils TR ! .1408 illOG .1119 .1116i ! LT ! .6869 .11E6 .0111 .0167 R ! .09te .0156 .0188 .0033 I R -ADJ! .6610 .0880 .8074 .0106 ! T ! .6908 .1659 .1683 .1629 ! .1311 '0264 i9629 1.1176 ! ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR LT TH RT ! LT TH RT 0011TH ! 0 ! SOUTH ! 41.8 41.8 41.0 ! *** e ! NORTH ! 0 NORTH ! 32.4 32.4 32.4 ! 56 238 0 ! ' WEST ! M 4EST ! 14.9 14.9 56.7 ! 1 1 1 29 15! EAST ! 0 EAST 1 14.9 14.9 14,9 ! fi*t *#* 0 ! it** ti CAU17.1LATE. MANUALLY APF'R SOUTH NORTH ! 35 WEST EAST ! 789 MOVEMENT ■ VOL VOLUMES T TH RT TOT 492 ,.i...1 1015 , ! 947 S'34 2 737 ' ! 25'7. 94'%. 10 491 535 ! 337. 37. 25 51 . 865 ! 94'2 317.,. 5.07. ! 5 ! 5.0..! E 07. ION 'SEP'ARATIO l ?'E / W-D I PECT ION SEPARATION APPROACH V /C VALUES WEST EAST SOUTH NORTH �,.;:_.....,.,�..,..,... r...... u. ... .:..r.,.�...:,. .,.�,.. �..� ter: 1 . 1880 . 1425 . 1841 . 0117 -ADJ ! .':0000 . 1367' . 1603.; . LEG VCDLUI1E ! LEG ! AT LOS C .0000 .2005 .0000 .0156 . 000 (2h .1828 ▪ 0201. 00610 ` .: `.403 ,, 0000 .042.., 0244 . '22t1 • 15 i 5 .02813', !: . 121'0 0000' ! I t3 . 0195 AVAIL (SECS) SOUT4-1 ! 18.3 18.3 i :3 NORW ! 19.5 19,.5 "0. IWJEST 11.8` 1.1.8 80'.0 !Y1*'* t' cL I N ! CB 7. ! ! N ! ! N/S.—ID I REC't IC:1N SEPARATION ! W ! ta% ! W ! ! E,'W—DIRECT ION SEP'etst..ZAT ION , ; E ! 5;; ID% ° E , , ■ , • ' -SIGIVALIZED INTERSECTIO , 1.6 INTEPIrJECTION:' TIGARD ;GREENBUP VOLUMES:, .:;,,,ITOTAL TRAFFUI::,:A METRO SIZE : 20';, espo TO ;100i000 !PHASE !PFE- !PHASE !,PHASE !PHAS • • • • ! . . - SEPV10E .,- LEVEL 1 1 1 sATURATIoN 6E3% -1 1 I *****4t****************,■i,* AF Fsf51.0A1;:1-1 LANE GEOP1ETRY; '<SOUTH NTH WEST , EAST LANE ! MOVL Ii1DTH MOVE WIDH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH I I t ! T.. 120' R.. 12.0. .0, 'R.. • -12.0 L.. 112.0 T.. 12.,,0 .0. - 3 ! .0 T.. 112.0 .0' , .0 ! ° MOVEMENT VOLUME,S. ! MOVE SATUF.I.ATION ! MOVEMENT.,".LOS !, APPR LT 'TH 1" TOT! LT ItH RT ! LT TH PT 1. YI•M I IMS■ OM. •••• MA. WM Ole. ,;',11•10.00.• =00 .1.016 WM* i•■■• owe irom 1 ••••• 1.4 •••■ •••"' , SOUTH ! 482 444 0 926 ! 68% 627. 07.! C C" NORTH 0 326 11,9 445 ! 0Y.' 687. 154% ! . C B WEST ! 0 0 0 , 0 ! 07. 07s ! . . .. . ! EAST 130 0 380 510 1 367. , 07. 6811/. ! A c APF'R! TF:14:*.S! ,N01! ! 1, ' ! •••••• I. ma I isro I mui ! S 0% ! rs N 5.07.! N W ! .0%! E 5.07.! !I\l/S-DIRECTION SEPARAtiON !E/W-DIRECTION SEPARATION (C-4)!, AFIP:IROAC:H VALUEt3 MOVE SOUTH NORTH WEST EA( ° R ! .0000 R -ADj! .0000 T ! .2467 L .2770 LEG VOLUME ° LEI:i AT LOS .0661 ; 2111H ,.,(3130ra .0900 0906 ■10300 0000 cataoca ' TIME ,AVAIL',,;(SECS)° MOVE STORAGE AF'PR LT " RI, ! LT ••••1 •.■• um. Lai ,•■• 3.■ 6.6•1441.4 ...*:•■ .64 :••••: ••••4 4,6 ..Not sow ow* •••••••01 Isoomer •••■ SOUTH ! 1140 ! SOUTH ' 39.3 39.3 .0 ! 340 313 ,0 ! NOF.:TH 1046 ! Nt3RTI.4 ! .0 112 (3.` 12.8 I 0 175 128 WEST 496 WEST .0 .0 .0 ! 0 0 EAST 420 EAT 25. ! ,0 '0 '271`.°' ;. SOUTH MOVE .WIDTH T.Y. 1 2 ■ {U.r, MOVEMENT VOLUMES , APP'P...' LT TW RI TOT E"IUTN.> ! 05 511 , I4C RTH ! 0 1238 474. 1712 WEST EAST 05, 0 0 ? 6 am, awe ima s ,.r 0 N ! 5.(6.„! W ! 0"%.! E ! 5 07! I `6 -D RECt I I, ON SEPARAT I OF ! E /W DPI RECT. I ON SEPARATI O'' MOVE ' SOUTH; .0000 h -ADJ'! . 0000 T ! .283' L ! .1178 Ar6P OAC;.H, V�`O. ,VALUES NORTH, WEST EAST y gr r. r-.. «. 'r.:. w..�..n. iaw i` � -:I r.... w.i. Xie «Y.r.:.: r3t: 2633 .: 0,140(4 .2885 , 'Ogee .0000 3439 .'0010,;01 . 0021 .'0110 0 LEEi VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL `,S C AT LOS. C ! APP LT TH E"' i ....... �..� 1.r t� r..rrw wr 4.:o...: wri:�tW ri..l Y wwirL `t:.:ilrr.w ! .. w:r«ilbrrww::l.wiLr wwa�isw'sl wdiiw� SOUTH ! a. 780, NORTH ! 2262 ' WEST ! 560 EAST 598 SOUTH ! 2` NORTH WEST ! EAT 1i 44******** ** PPRC AC SOUTH i,,iORTH.w; .rAh E ! MOVE ' WIDTH MOVE W ID �.. r,:: +l.W.....� 1 r.r +.w •.w.lre,.�wr ..w. �,..J.+r wwiw:r �'�..« it APPR SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST MOVEMENT VOLt.MES `!, ' MOVE 'SATURATION, ! MOVEMENT L■O LT TI- t T 1 OT TH FAT. ! LT; 'TH {w4 1010 »__ rrrww.w. wl r.....:..wr+ ' .10 r10 .r.:.: 05 511 0 716 ,1 33Y 91% @I ! .A E _•,N "' 474 1:» 1'T 1 Qlr: � 9,1 `/10 10 21,11 , ^1010.3 • t 0 0 @ 1 OY •, % ! ,1010 520 25 ! f / '0/ :,'a1 .v. k--WL <.! PEDg' NJ ! PHASING' r' • r.07.! ! 5 N ! 5.0'/! ! N W ! .0 %! ! W E . ! 5.07. ! 1 E LEA. SOUTH NORT1 -1 WEST EAST ! M / S--,D I REOT I OM SEPARATION' ! E/W - DIRECTION SEPARATION °• AFSPR'OAC:H V/t VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST 1 . F. ! . 0000 ■ :633 r 0000 . $$"� -ADJ ! 0]00 F: ■ 0000 .00003' T ! . 2839 .343 . 0000 • 000 + ' L ! a 117 ' . 0000 . 0000 : ri 178 LEO VOLUME ! ! ` TIME AV'AI'L (SECS) !' ! MOVE ,'STOMA( AT LOw i_ ! API," ! LT TH ITT' L'T' r..i .4......10:. ■■■ 10r: 4,1.11_.64 1 ..r WOO ∎64 wl.w■I■14i•.:..,..iL.:: ::....t'� : --! .ii: 'i:ir:104,Ewlrri'.i•.:. `NOR;TI- ',@ ' @; EAT •J 1. `_ , A PPOACH Li MOVE WI DTW MOVE 'WIDTH t -r31,1 I. sit MOVEMENT VOLUMES LT TH ri(r TOT EAST' • SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST 07. 69% 297. 697.. 697. 07, 7. 07. APPR! TRKS ! !X —WLK! PEDS? NO! _l____-1 8' ►, 5.0% ! � s N 5.0%! ! W ! 5. „0%! E e 0% ! ! N; S—DIRECTION SEPARATION ! E /W—DIRECTION SEPARATION APPROACH MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH 00O0 0000 .1711 '.04x'3 i Fti ! 135x1 —ADJ ! 0000 T ! 2678 L ! .0000 LEG VOLUME LEG ! AT LOS C SOUTH ! 1048 NORTH ! 945 WEST ! 365 EAST ! i:� r x til AVAIL ( SECS ) ! MOVETORAOI TH RT ! LT 3r 1 NORTH MOVE 'W IDTH` SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST OVEMENT VOL.LJMES ! MOVE SATURATIO ,JEMEf TH RT TOT ! LTTH RT !, I_T TH i..iM.r_ ...,. ■ir...wii.. -- «w...... i 115 F.,1 ▪ 1097. to 1411 ! 60/ 1.097. 0/. 245 667 ! x:097.. 07 527. 'APF'r ! " IRKS ! ! X -WL,K ! PEDS? NO .......-......,11........----.. 1 ! _... -..,.. , (._ • .......a.'. ! 5 . 0', 1 ! t! ! N ! W ! 5.0% ! 1'. E 1 .0 %! ... :».i.........�...��µ ! N /S-- DIRECTION SEPARATION ! E /W_OI EOTIOI'i SEPARATION I' APPROACH ' 'VALUES MODE . !DU'H MOiTH WEST BAST;+ 0639 .0000 . 1.361 0000 --F�P ! .0000 .0000 1017.r 0P0 . 2800 ■ ■ 256 0000 0000 .�. 2 0 9 5 , ..40 G:01aCdCd . LES VOLUME ! ! TIME ;AVAIL' "(4.,E; '0 AT 1.08 TH,') 'T , t ! SOUTH , 22 0 ! .NORTH ! 0' ! WEST ! 20. t, 0 ! EAST AF'PR ones owe we* SOUTH NOF:TF d WEST EAST MOVEMENT VOLUMES _T. ' . TH RT TOT 504 115 6',1'9 766 gib. 1411 0 245 68.7 N / S ? I PELT Y'ON` . SEPi kAT I E /W— DIRECTION .SEP'PAi7. AT APP'P;OACH V/C VALUES SOUTH NORTH WEST a 063S . 0000 . 0000 . 0001,0 2800, . 4256 wliwu.il w « ! ?M SOUTH ! 1345 NORTH ' ! 1''45 WEST EAST 567 TIME :AVAIL CS) ! AP'F'R LT TI'S -- -- «iw «. - \. SOUTH ! . 0 ? 1 . 1.5 NORTH 0 6I WEBS" EAST , 0 RES7T-Z I C:TED SIGHT CODE IS 1 M I NtIR STREET AID,TUST°1151\ITS AC:i.(.-.:Ell.ERAT I ON LANE? NO 1.7:URB RAr.)I US OR TURN ANGLE7.? NO I , ,......... "..............7, , ...........-................* ..,................■.....1...-i.......%.--...,.....,•■•■.r... ....i.-.••••••••• , ' ..................,....,:..:..,..,...........,.,..+W,...'...,i..■:.a..;...,..,...........,..,,...••...T.,,...............'o■'^•'''"■■...T.•■•••, ..•••••••••.... ....""" , .............. -- .....,--.,-.----.-- ,,,-..-- 11 110'%,E 1 ,AL .1 AT ,1 AR 1 1 BL 1 LT ,1 BR 1 . CL 1 C:T 1 CR 1 DL 1 It)T 1 DR VOL 1 .1181 2t.301 '231 4Cil 1 2051 81 , 11 16 281 ,161‘ 26 62',',1 , ° PI:-.:1.4 ' 20 ° ' 1 441-1 ' 1 .:1 ' fb 1 .181 3H ,,..., le : 29 .,, 68 , ,J.' ' .- i'' ,' ' 1 ' 1,'. - ', .1 1 LANES 1 1 . 1 _._...._.„,................._..........„........................................ ............... , . .. , . . . . . STEP 1 RIGHT TIJR1',t FROM 1:.''',/D CF? . ... ' , 1 ' ' , DR POTENTIAL CAPACITY 1= 111 = 191. 972 PCIH DEMAND --1.- ' ' f':APAI.7., I TY USED = 8.477' I; ., , ; 6.996 V. IMPEDANIC:E FACTOR = ' ., z , '' - 953 SHAi•.ED LANE — SEE STEP 3 CRITICAL GAP = TG =. . • CONFL Il::T I N1`..i. FLOWS '..:.., 111-1 :.-;.-, ,''','''',;-712,*) '' 1 ' r ,, ,, ' , 252/1.9.0. , ,sV.EP, cF1:, . , , , . , 31 , ' 1 ' '' 68 '",' FiCH"' , , I NO SHARED LANE -- FI.ESERVE ..i.-... - ' '0.- - '''" ,,, , , ''' ." t'„ PCH DELAY t.:4 LOS = 1 ' ,, , , I■1/A .................................,,,..,.........,.............-....................,........,,...-__.-... , .......t.40.4...i..4.16...........ii.........is.,..7„,,, .::-.........................,‘.4,• ...1.,......,,...../...04.4,...,....74.4,..1.1.....,,...■.;........,16,....,....1.... , . S'l'EF° 2 — LEFT TURNS FROM CONFL F:''LOWS = MH CRITICAL SAP',==: , POTENTIAL :CAPACITY, ' 98S. .. , DEMAND = " , SHARE._ POTENTIAL AVA I L�ABL.E STEP 4' —E ' TURN FROM;, C /D C:ONFL. I CT I NG; FLCIWS = CRITICAL GAP T; POTENTIAL C:APAC: I `i Y ADJUST FOR I MPEDANCE: NO SHAPED LANE DEMAND AVA I LABL E PESERVE DELAY °c LOS WI T H LEFT °t THE :U SHARED LANE DEMAND = Pi . CAPAC I TAY OF SHARED .LANE 0 0. PCH AVA a LAB LE RRSEPVE — @' . • DELAY °e LOS N/A N/A WITH LEFT p THRii, & 'RI SH .! i 5,` SHARED LANE DEMAND .= 1 CAPAC I TY OF SHARED LANE = 71 S AVA I;LABLE RESERVE 666. DELAY o, 1.08 = A _ ,:....: LOS i_ VOLUmES: FOR LEA C VEHICLES PER HOUR10. 4.4 « . �...:__. ima 0.011 SIGNALIZED INTEFSECTIC * ,* '4 -WAY'I I111.T,ERSEC:T I Ci‘l :, HALL BLVD AND OAK ST ALTERNATE::` TOTAL TRAFS'IC ' COUNT PM PEAK' . , TYPE Lbe.:ATt C)1■1 , F'F.,ROA17:1-1'- CODES ARE LANE " :1* 2 3 4 GPAFE.I .�%1 A rPA DE= . �h ' 1 GRAD .OY. ' •' ' , ';`, • , SPEED: 35 MPH d d , C RE.STF!Ir....:TEr) "SIGHT C7',O1)E' I '1 141I1\10F: STF::EET AIDJUSTMI:741\ITS ' * • AC:C:ELE::F:AT I r3N LANF IO , • , „ CURB RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE*::' NO • . os. rem ammo two are •■■• •■•■• nom wit/ sum mom A.... moo Now awe. eget ad... ammo 'wow 4.4 •■•• *or wimp on. APPR A L B t C . D , c CT ' ' CF ° DL DT' R !;..10(;r5 ' AT A. R.. ,,B 1D 36 486 3 23 52 110 3 23 82t , VOL 47t 441 12' 1' PCH 1 5t L '1 401 1', , .1 25t 57r121J 33 MOM 6* ■■•■1 .1,61 =W60, 00.4 000,10.1.011.1.1. .101110 ••••• ,1■111.1■0114. OM. 41.1.1MIN 1.0•11..1.400.11, 01.14 ■10.00 60.1■10,011. “..-------------------------------- , • • . • , • ' • • • • • • ,•,, •• • , • • , • , ,, • ., _ , . , ••• • , , • • • , 1, I. , , • • , .. . , , , ,, „ • STEP '1 ' 'F.,!I GHT TURN . FROM C/D ' ' 1 ', ' '' : ' , , ,Cs, C. 01.11FL I CtTI N(,'i FLOWS =,HMH : =....z.' , ', , ' ' i • , 447 ,, . .• ' , 501 .Y,vpH CP. I, T I C',ItL 'Gar,: . :TG :=,. ' , : : ' 5.0 5.0, SEC:8". POTENTIAL C:ARAC I -t'Y .= 'Ill = '1, , ', ', :754. ' ' , ''' ,, - ,7: ,PQH'',',, DEMAND -.-.--- ' ,, - , ,, . . , , 121; I MPEI)AhlCE , ,FAI"....:TOF! ' = —* . ' a BEG ' , , , .,'934!:' .,' 9. *- E,E,' '".. • , , ,,,,,, .,. , ',1 „.,, C:APACI TY USED ...t , , , , , ' . 16. 042 , , , . ' • ,,, • , , , SHARED LANE -' SEE 3 „, , , pi. • • •• • ' 1„ , , : •,.. ., • • ..• • , •• ,•,. • , 11,1: . • • 1 ' ' , • •• ,•„•• • , ' • ' ' III:, I' ' . NO ' SHARED LA 'ilt: - r1;-"SERVE •:.-,'' I ■H , I , , . I , . . ■ ■ , . I I ' . I DELAY 51,.' LOS = ' -, ,,, ,,, ,1 N/A ., ---4',....------------,-,-`''"'4 •''`""'"''"'....'''.''.-..,,,r,,,,,--,-.,.-.----..-,-'..'--'--.h''.-'-'r--'.--..-66'.'-'.-7'-'rh-'...'"=-.'.-,''"-,-,-. , . STEP 2 LEFT TURNS 'FROM .Ell A ,11,, , ' ', tiL , , , r, ,' - , . ' ALI i.,01\IFL I CeT Mu r-LcIws, .-:-.... 1.11-1 -'?..'. ',', , . 453, , .. , • . OR I 'T IiAL ', 'GAP = TG ,,e4 T 1 : I ' 46 5 ' ' , -, -, ,L H,'-,,''''',-',',,.. • POTENTIAL CAF'A7'.I1rY = 843. 791. ,i DEMAND, .-.-', : , .: , , ., • . , , , CARACI''T'V, L13EI) ,---=:. ' ' 1 • ' ' '' ' '' • I MPDi!hNi.,E , FACTO ' ..',9t,i9 d ' • ' 1 L • AVAILAPL8'ililOP:SEF:V'=• DELAY & L08 A DJUSTME aq ` 10 SHARED. AVA I 1. ABLE RESERVE DELAY & LOS = SHADED LANE WITH 1 SHAREI LANE DEMA II POTENTIAL CAPAC I T1 AVA I LA'ECLE ;RESERVE DELAYS LOS STEP 4' -- LEF"T TUF ?.N F•R'.rf"i;i :;!'D,;; CONFL,I C ' I NG `FLOWS`' - ' ADJUST F'OR: IMPEDANCE . : NO SHAPED LANE DEMAND AVA I`LAE;LE • RESERVE DELAY of LOS — WITH LEFT & THRLJ SHAEEY LANE DEMi D k, :APAC I TY OF SF-�A Y'EL! LAME AVAYLAE'LE ; ;ESERVE` = DELAY & L.OS WITH LEFTS THRU, & RISHT SHAREI LANE DEMAND = 203 x,,26', CAF'AOITY OF SHARED LANE - 43 r. . w° 349R'' AVA I LADLE RESEC VE 232`. 223'. DELAY R LO a e C >C LOS CC VOLUMES: VEHICLES PER .PEkH HOUR wl.ri....r... ..+ �.i..::..�...�..1.�:.:...+:. i�..1 f... b......a �.. r.:.r ..C. �...�r.,«.. �:. .:Y:: ...t..r..:i "••••.. ,...:5!"44;...w....+ ,�r.: e.ltaL .:.1... GRADE= .�V. GRADE= 07 , , . , • , ,, c SPEED: 35 MPH `, . , ' , RESTF:IC:TED SIGHT CODE IS 1 1 . , 11 INOF;';'. STREET ADJUSTMENTS -- ACCELERATION LANE? NO 12:1.1R8 RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE? NO • MOVE AL , AT,' AR 1, BL BT CL CF.' DL DT,,. ID VOL. 1 51 295 72 42 357 151 77'1 0i 32 PCH 11' ' 61 11 1 461 85 0 35 01 , 1 LANES' STEP 1 RIGHT TURN FROM c/D CP DP t. ., r:ONFL I C:T I N13 FLOWS = MH =, 331. '3E,14. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TG - 5- 0 '' ,' ...). 0 .',.) Cb POTENTIAL.. C:APACITY = I'll = ' 855. '' 829.. -PCH DEMAND = ' 35 ' 6 , PCH' C.:AFJ'AI.7,:i TY USED = 4.094 • 724 /. IMPEDANCE: FACTOR = SHARED LANE - SEE STEP 3 NO SHARED LANE - RESERVE = 0. DELAY 8t LOS = N/A •••■■ 11.1.11 .141, 11•••• 1/01•• — LEFT TURN FF:DM, C/D CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH 74°' CRITICAL GAP, = TG = POTENTIAL CAPACITY = .MN = ADJUST FOO. .±MPEDANCE: NO SLIAREI) LANE DEMAND = AVAI! ARLE F:E9EPViet ' MO I* ‘11 % DELAY & LOS WITH LEFT .1{ THRU SHARED LANE DEMAND = ' CAPACITY OF SHARED LANE = 0. AVAILABLE RESERVE 7 1 0. DELAY & LOS :-"-- .N/tA . ., WITH LEFT THRU, .1,P, RIGHT SHARED LANE DEMAND = 120 CAPACITY OF SHARED LANE = 435. ' & 23 1,,,' AVAILABLE F.'ESE-:R DELAY LOS A VE = , 315. 411. `',, GRADE= SPEED: 35 MP. P.ESTRIC"*..TEI? SIGHT CODE 'IS 1 „ MINOR STREET :ADJUSTMENTS - ACCELERATION LANE? NO CURB F::ADIUS OR ANGLE? AF'PR .1 A , OVEM 1 HARED LANE ',WITH ..EFT , TUF, HARED LANE DEMAND POTENTIAL C:APAC:I TY AVA I L;AL3LE 'RESERVE DELAY ,as LOS • LEFT TUF.N 'FROM `C /D CONFL I C:TI N 3 FLOWS MN CRITICAL C; AF' = TO POTENTIAL CAPACITY ` = MN " ADJUST FOR I MPE )ANCE . . Ql" 6.0;; SECS 2 203 1 ` 3. i No SHARED LANE DEMAND AVAILABLE RESERVE �_ @: F'CH DELAY LOS = N/A WITH LEFT °r THRU SHARED LANE DEMAND = CAPACITY 'OF SHARED . LANE = AVAILABLE RESERVE = «. DELAY & LOS = N/A N/ WITH ; LEFT , THF,'U, g RIGHT SHARED LANE DEMAND = 147 CAPACITY OF I SHARED LANE -= 288. AVA I LASL .E RESERVE ;= —9. ` 'F DELAY ar °10S' LOS O VOLUME8 VEHICLES PER ''HOUR VEF: 3/87 IGALIZ • • ,• . • • , • :,. • „ TIGARD NTPSECTION : EENBILIP.„..A ND, LOCUST LTPRNTE: 'TOTAL TFAFTIC ' METPO COUNT P11;: * n O LOCATION , • ' ” PROACH CODES ARE LANE ' .1 2 3 4 GPADE PSFC1ION CAPACIT : —WAY INTERSECTI B 4 GRADE Q1 C 43 ' *.H.D 5 SPEE::i 3 1v1P1-i F%4ESTR I C:l'ED S I GFIT CODE IS 1 M I NOF: STREET ADJUSTMENTS ACCELEF'.AT I ON 1.-At4E'';'' NO CL.IF'.18 RADIUS OR TURN AN(31....E1' N ••••• OtOND ••■•• Mei iaddit I.N118111.111•1044 ON. b.. VIM MP= 611.16 itt**10.101. NY. N.* ItMe NM* *Si.. ••■•• 60./I441.1 MOW, *Mit CF..** IOW OM* OM* AF,pp. 1 A MOVE 1 AL 1 AT 1 AR 1 BL BT 1 BR 1 CL CT 1 C %)C1L 1 101 4751 471 491 5321 151 1601 71 1 111 1 1 541 176 6 LANES :ma :so 4 1,, leas ■■•■■■■■......., 81-EF', 1 .F.:Il-IT TURN FROM 'WI? l' ', : ' ' ' ;' ..' CF! l ' CO,NFL I ::T I , N,G FLOWS = M 1,, , , , . , ,;. ., 499. r, 5.i40 VPi.., C:F: T I C:AL. ',GAP ., = , TO = , , , , ,, ', 5 0 !-',5 .. 0 $'.p POTENTIAL CAPACITY T Y' , M: ) . ■ 'r ' ' ' r ' 7,613 , . 0,''. 81 , .' PCH DEMAND = ' . ' ' ' ' PCH CAF'AC I TY USED 8.48 . , t.4.: , ,344; Y, 1 , , . I141PEDA1\10E FACTOR, = ' ';:),t1.,,Q) , , ' L,,,,, ''084§ , ..' ■ ' ' ,. ' ''' ' SHA1-:ED LANE .- SE ' STEP' . 3 , . . , NO SHARED LANE — REBERVE DELAY ,, ' ! ,, ,, ,,, ,,, N/A ., . $.t',. ' LOS ', = ' 1 ' ' ' ' ' .......,__ , , - . - - ., ,.....,,,.,-....6....,,...,.........,,.—...,—,,,,,.....—,,:,..:,..........,,....,,,,,.:,,,,i,--...:,„:,,,,,,.....,............—..,,...,..—,..,,,,,,...,,,--....,..„....,,,..,,,,...,..,,,,,,,—, . .. PCH STEP 2 LEFT TURNS F____Fi.C)11 BioN CC:)t\IFL I C"T I NG FI-.0148 = 1"'1H 547 VPH CR I T I Cit'hL = TG = POTENTIAL CAPACITY — 665. PC1 D81..AY .?:t LOS = , DElvIANI) AvAILAbLE R8sEkvE ACTOR = CAPAtItY UsE•.r) BL AL , 5522. t21N , 7'7 ,947 6950 64i. ' A 54 67',6 99 STEP 4 — LEFT TURN FROM c/r) , - ,r CL T. t coNFLIc"rING FLOWS -- Iiiii == 11421. 1185. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TG :-.‘-' - ,, , ` ., 6.0 ' , , 6.0 SECS POTENTIAL C:AF'ACITY = MN =, " 217. ' 203. PCH ADJUST FOR IMPEDANCE: , 93. - '. 174. ,;PC WITH ,LErr.!,THF:u SHARED LANE,- DEMAND .=.' ''.': ,' ' ' ' ''', ' 0 0 ,': '.* '''' ' ,:::APAI.::ITY '''OF '.SHARED LANE ' = : ' , , , . 0. rF.OH,:,,,,, AVAILABLE RESERVE' =' ',.." :' ' ; '''',' ' .,. 'Ot,,H.', . . , , , . . . . . DELAY tt LOS .= ' , ' '' .'' ' l'' '' '; ', ' '' ' ' ' ' N/A ' ''' , , ■ i ■ ' ,I ' ::r ' "i, , . r ' ; ' '''''''''.■■•,:'-:!7.,-,,,,,,,.. , .. , , WITH LEFT, rTHF.:U,' ',8t RIGHT ' , SHARED LANE ,DEMAND,,, =.. , „ , ,,', CH CAF'ACIT',(' pr ..911ARED,, LANE LAN', '..t.- '' ' ' . 0. , 300. PCH AVAILABLE, 'RESEle.;'...VE = ' '''.. ',. .:' ' r' ' ''','''' , '''' - Fl "I'.'"711 DELAY ..,It, LOS. "„="'''' '. : ,' - 1,, :. :',,,,,, , ...„.: ------------,—,,--.------ ---- r,; DEPAKTMENT 11IWAYS P1181 JLTIPIi $E ;ARTEOF OtI11L 6ti PR06RE3 AND SION . r rR rP0IRTAt1C ARTER!.. PH ,3E SEQUENCE IS.'LEADIPF, 6RERN CROSS 'STREET P'1n6E SEDUENCE I6 t,EADING BREEN V/C DELAY PR08. NIN MOVEMENT 'PATIO : "(OTAL '' AVERA(E 0r;,•QJEUE .. .STOPS DELAY (X) , (106) (VEH -1,R) (SEC /VEH) (L0S) CLEAR. (4) (V'EH'HR)(X)! .: CYCLE'., _ r_rwr�r .r-- elirrrrri.rr_ w__rr_,....w_wrr��. r��'W _li.r _r _ r_N. 'NB�THRU : ° -91 (E)' 7.46 i 54.6 (E) 47 429, ( 871 LEFT : 5 4.42 ?1.7 °(C) 118' 373: -`'( 74). 98 THRU : 91 (E). 1.8.32 43.2 (0) 54 431:: i 62)` LEFT : 9'. (A) .33 34.4 (D) ' 1 1 25, i /3a`: . Eli THRU : 18 (A) .21 49.8 ' ` (0) 108 13: "( .88) LEFT : '42 (A)'' .58 52.9 (E) 97 31.'; '( 89) W8 .THRU.: 8 (A) .21 29.6 (C) 180 1?. ( 68) ' LEFT : 98 (E) 11,.t'(7 58.1 (D) 59 689.; 4(, 87) •4 NODE 1 : 91 (MAX) 32.42 45.1 ' 2818. ( 78), 115 1 : ***# INiTERSECTION ',2 HMV 217 NRAN OFFSET= 13.4 SECONDS, 12.2 ARTERIAL PHASE SEC1ENCE IS THROUGH MOVEI9ENTS FIRST CROSS STREET PHASE SEQUENCE I5 LEADING GREEN MOVEMENTS GREEN TIME (SECS) GREEN TIME (4) ARTERIAL CRD11 STREET 2 +6 5 1+5 TOTAL 3 +8 4 +8 4+7 TOTAL, 46.6 18.4 .1 65.0 45.1 ' .1 ' .1 45.1 ' 42.4 16.7 .1 59.1 41.9 .1 .8 41.9 Y/C - DELAY - -- PROB. MIN MOVEMENT RATIO TOTAL. ;AVERAGE OF QUEUE STOPS DELAY (7) (LOS) (VEH -HR) (SEC /VE11) (1.0$) CLEAR. (x) (VEH /HR) (t) CYCLE • N8 THRU : 61 (6) 1.89 7.6 (8) 99 122. (24) LEFT : 92 (E) 4.76 03.6 (F) 31 185. (1.11) 58 THRU 91 (E) 13.30 38.7 (0) 52 983. ("19) N8 THRU : 93 (E) 7.81'; 54.1 (E) 39 451i,. (U7) LEFT : 31 (A) 1.44 25.3 (C) 1Pe 13Ii ( 66) NODE 2 : 93 (MAX) 28.40 38.2 PASSER 11-84 INTERSECTION .,3 •• .•..• rtTERI,AL,1''PASE'''•SEUUENCE'"IgIA66tNa'i.GREt ROSS ,;STREET.PHASE 'SEDUENCE "IS'LAG61146:GREEk;■. ARTERIAL' CROSS'',STRE ,NOVENENTS 1+6, 4+7 GREEN, TINE (SECSS''' 27.7 3.5 71 2 38,13, GREEN TINE ( 5:2 39.5.1 61.7 35.3 0 1//C '"-'''''-'' .., DELAY '" . "--..-"'4 ' ' ' 4PROB''' '' '' - 0 .' .'', .. ".,-., ' '. . ' .'. ' ',..•',.: ''' '''', !I', i. , , .. ':', . ■ . ■ , ‘ , DELAY VEtil fll* ,':'''' 4''''',':' 'RA1','1111: ' ' 4' . TOTAL-''..`,;,,,...AV.RAGE,:'''''',,c',''::,:,..::L.pF.clii.E■si,,,Ii..,;,,s..rops,,,t,,..,,..::.,',,,,, , Z) (LOS) ''''''.''':'''',(11E11"HR) ''''(SEC)VEH) (LOS) ' ;'," ' 'CLEAR'u(%),'-`Ti(PE11/RS (%),, ''CYCLE ' " '". ' ,,, .'" .' 1"'."'''''' '..,f,,,' I ,''.. 4 ' ' '':, ' ''''''7'1)•.,-,... ' ',' • ', :::: ' ' ' ,.",1' ''.'*. . . NO, THRU :, '',94 (ES.',-,-..- '..5.66,, 411.,4,,,..(D) . '', ',-,,36,,;', ," 234.:',..(.46)'',' ., 511,1HRO':-' '34 i.,!:A) . - ' ',' .91 " 10 6' 4 ' ( 8 ) ' 4 ' ' ' ' ' 100 : ' ,137:'-'''( , 45)*''' 'LEFT ,:'..:14 (E),. , 11.80.' ' 61.'4, (El: ,,‘," 39,.,'*:' 575:',,,.(, 89)1 I.7.11.THrt11. :" ' 52 '' (A) - ','.' "..„ 2.16' ., , 31.8 . ,(C),'. , ",1,1"1111 ''' ' ' ;" '11121:( 74), , ; . ,, . , . ' ' "- ' ' 1 ''' '' ''' '8 '' C8iii., ,.,.. LEFT ...,.'.s3' (k,.. , .,.,7.,38 ., Dval.... '-(EY. ' . - 1 . 36 , ' 3 9., r. rAi-IDEL 3 94 (MAX) ,1' 27.1e -..',..",,15„5, , , . 1 1516..:(, 71),'„ 123, *** PASSER 11-84 BEST SOLUTION SUMMARY/ - TOTAL SYSTEM PtRFORNANCE, *** EFFICIENCY VERSUS CYCLE LENGTH' CYCLE LENGTH EFFICIENCY 98 .31 188 .31 BEST SO1.11TIGN 110 .33 BAND A WisiSTO (S'iCS) 38 28 ETFICIE'elCY' , : .38 n. SPEED (11P11) 38 311 ATTAT.NOILITY : 1.08 1:7 , 1— .,.., ti) r PERFORPIALE TOTAL TOTAL AVERAGE TOTAL FUEL MAX MIN —ii MEASLES VEHICLES DELAY DELAY STOPS CONSUMPTION CYC1.E 1 , !SA — , (1/EH/11R) (YEH-HR) (SEtiVE11) 11/E11/H12)(%) (GAL/HR (SEC) ,-, .., ......__................__. , III TOTAL I 7489: 87.9 42.7 54132. 5( 73) 1111.5 1211 ,...J • i > . TEXAS DEPARTMENT pE,HI6HWAYS AND PUBL!C'TRANSPORTA:I PASSER2 .:MULTIPHASE ARTERlIiL,; RDSRESSIDN 1451Di r 3 . w. TIME- SPAC DIAGRAM FOR:; TIGARD DISTRICT HWY,217 SRAM 117..68 97.3% HWY 217 NRAM 13.45 12.2% NAPLELEAF BS .1% + + + ++ ++ ; + + + + + ++ 'A' BAK') 38 MPH 38 'SECONDS KEY: 414+ GOTH LEFTS (1 +5) OOTH THROB (2 +6) SCALES: HORIIONTAL - 'I INCH VERTICAL - 1 INCH "B' BAND 36 MPH 28 SECONDS ++ LEADING GREEN (2 +5) LASSIN6 GREEN (1 +6)'. 36 SECONDS (1 INCH 1W CHARACTERS) 218 ' FEET t1: INCH = 6 LINES)