Loading...
CPA 89-04 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. t , „,,ti■Or'41 ear of Tigard Planning omaissiort: This is4our final Presentation on the 24 :hour got N Now and Taco Bell applicatic:eri, If.rlow , you haVe :tio,ierd this api3lication seiteral tiiiee but ilerhapEl you can renlain neutral in your final decision based on the following wrap up by MO 3 subcommittee. • This final presentation as an official 1P0 3 terminates upon the final decision of this application, ' The NPO ls were chartered to be community oriented and to review the processes pertaining 1 , to affected neighborhood° ra exactly what we are doing 'toniglato We question the Coramull1-1 Development Director's interpretations, and indeScrotiolas as a final basis of a Plan without XPO public review affirmation, Reviewing the language before you by Keech Assoc, the hired traffic study done by the applicant Tao Belle, You do not have any professional study done by NPO 3 as we were r3omrai.sel.oned for eitiZklil input only, ete in all oases within the report and from the City of' Tigar.d if indication is that "traffic study, by professional is required of NPO”? Note Keech upeEtk's' hour represents the staff shifting from the 6 a.,m, breakfast to 8 aeme which is their slow down time, Anbetween shifts not Prime time thrOughaut g4 hourt SElfetr study :from Tigard School Dist. figurt\s was ignored as tralitez,s by law are not, taken by bus if living within l miles and use Grant St, shown on this application as the egress for both Hot N Now and. Taco Bell on Park Ste At no time did. NPO 3 review assesses to constitute the equivalent of the shopping center aspect before you tonight. Neighbors did a 12 hou oatit on traffic circulation taking place at the 99W and Park St, intersection ye*. these figures are not giVeil, to you from this voltulteer effort? The Safety study from Tigard Scheel Diet. explained 'thi project . would pla00 students extreme danger". ODOT also responded to the fiel.(f)abOrliOed ins is , . and took, time to meet with the City Ofc'Tigatect staff to cooperate with 'policy formulated and how best to address 2 fast food 24 hour :restaurani aPPlications ‘usitia HWY** 99 aocess/h;'/IAN NPO 3 felt support 1,11';'41 shown by 0300T and Tiftia3=1. SoficK31 rilstc 231, neight.Drhciod but not from the City of T'igara ittaffitag? Gletfiee'04.1•4="0.' k 17,trice , , Right turn only on (tr voted On by .11P° stating '�b' 140, Greelaburg, t, not buttons a:4 shown on staff's iritort1,onal sheet, A Ot'Arb will curial). 24 hor :eget restaurants fromi.u0 Izark St, ' realdential ' 'att. leitatit scheol ttallItersu • •" +fir IA, � sv ' I A+' °fw'r+ r _ i' .'i( '+ - '� '(�� ,t��Gq Ida I A�� I- , ,.: oeve1opere ,re asks ft r ail ameni.ties 'that. r .11 increase .east * f torearti. ipati.®71 ; without.rem to.nei abo hoed safety nor ,er ,l'i. of''lrife for res d` �� 9 i. e�at:3.a . 1io NPO 1," in.Janes Were I told-by staff °'this , `a done d0a1 i.t meets,-e. r?+� � A �.�. 'cede req1. oteots n and s stai'f �.pto�;�. � 1. was shooed.,to ses, a•:lacy ®.�.. �� ted '�® � � _ .I�.'0 �Cnow #.,;:,..',...,,,,.. the area well and beast 'tr'id a?this is' !bat is o in'� ,e e c 1l * .1i 2 , �' � Pe,,. � a 'si0at d00si0.4s P air" c�e°t" d � d e d r Hite b 'staff *-;.-:::,,:..:'N:,':',: • � � .,th4t there ,was aa®thsac sate planned adja+cent that -wou adei to impacts' "e, and safe We � �. � �� � '�''®�� a were:,:��'.,�. it�vas ��.�st�c� when ., . ,;. estioned'�staff' • .i" � � �� �w`4 g� on another adjacent'restaticant'and felt a# l.ess as an���t(�,3 6„0, i : 'tie �fa,c ► f' tS There, ,s' no nor' •.•0 Cell Ctl '� de '�.o r� 1° �. � des . accea�s �;raf � � fic�� s tAxw e re aired ;for rev w? 4�. �� q ie Landscape is clear;cutta't .ald geow th putting,'in', 2' width *,. , treev and ral, pans of designated foilage if in a;c:orutmerc .al meta, corms coil. zone '7 ;This site hed, the required 15% old ,growth trees and. we' a shown on the original Plan •. 'ti. andi.; told to US r'existi trees. meet ifile 1%requi't'ed landsoaped'only now .to see total. removal ' Options before, you tonite #1 c1Ose Holt ' Now aoce*ay to Park Sty 'use o©nmon Pacific: Hwy access; Option.#2 bumps (note 'not the pr .se d curb, Ogtion C connectican•shou :d ono be allowed for 2 restaurants and D Hot H,',Now,600? use'Hot'N Hew Pairrking, lot 'br wait,..of, `. '" S.Gh Park, 5t„ Lot ownership 1800 needs' s'Lte development revi.e ` anaiy::Yis' R�sciProcal. ' access easement for recording on deeded 6.. ies ` , Construction for ,�. Hot N N ow did not re u3re on ite c,�a r • : , �. tot .cl, �t . lowurored . into place b y a Crane,' This metal mod U.l ., pr$ tab, Itiate*.iaI haS I conorete 14aok itoatisi4 c a oste 11 NO dual; left `turnout �n :Park � �7� � , $$., 5""te� 011`t0' ra`�, � Pa �.f W.C� � +� � ► � '` �P '� entryratit Sty y shot 1.d: be used to facilitate these 2 f' ' a�s on � I . or(�d �estte,�ts � �ide��.... ne b� o �'�ty� +.,,' i..1 ODOI" has addressed the Hwy. 99 accesS and she d be Iol1ewed out, j,o•'thc i` lesta'l : feren �`� Agreement •on oint'use re ce on ;�,aroel deeds',tor access.,pe ,t om'pn i s 1,�:+order onto t W xth trh3ssaid despite Y disaataficat3 o with t he prb ,es s "`". supot the. tsff; F report with py added condition,andl a concr3te eery,,, � 8��and,.in � �'� � � �?'� b'la.,►�GiD7C1�,��, �'1!r,� c�.A rf'c� t $'� ,j irien to `these is es. o ' '0 ' Igt'�)l:� 24o4*. II � 8ubd nomatte I' y �''" ''' ' ; ' ' ' ''. fr'9,1.40:0 .: ..4.7''':.‘'.' L.'-'7,' ':'':'-"':,;•,' ,. 'T.r:''',''..'.7' '4 1 it J !• fl htI t 'Ir 1 IM, ', ^ 4 ' GUST Owners Authorizations for current app►l. cation. • Intrepretatican of continuance procedures • NPO notification. Notification. `;• ,Applicant provIdin g. testi,ln©r:during p'lann'ing commisi hearing reSchedule' earl,.- t,® another Martha Bishc.)p, NPO ryar�n.,ryrn.;w•n, Parick R& ll ' ,y Administrator Cit./ of Tigard August 3b 1993 RE: SDR 93- 0012 & MIS 93-0006' JOINT ACCESS CONDI'7Igli We want to thank you for the effort . your staff has made to listen to and understand our concerns, during thi: latest application e l ant submi • r r ing un�artun�� y due ' t,t�ng evidence re�� ..�� � to the �ppl�.o the joint access after the 20 day deadline we do not have sufficient time or funds to hire an experrt and prepare 4vidence which would counter the applicants 4q.cument. p W un�l�zrstand, that as a result of the �, pl i c�nconta , submitting evidence after the 20 day deadline, we can request which would provie* us the time necessary to respond to the Applicants untimely evidence. In the spirit of cooperation and our desire not to postpone a final decision on this application we request you consider the following request.. added which will require a re- assessment That a condition be �, � r 1 �- access at the traffic and sfety imp�c� � of t of the traf a � joint Pacific the time a dual S 1 left turn lane .:roar Far Highway 99W is proposed and a l so when an Y l ena u,e action And, require " a Public for Tax Lot 1805 is submitted. 'ea of the hearing on both matters to Provide public i` evi closing traffic assessa��ent . And, that If it is found that negate singg _ , ° �.� ' conflict with the joint access would increase safety left turn lane or adve�. y for a double • ,� traffic generated by Tax Lot 1805, .,hat the City would have the authority to close the access. While wee would prefer to have no access we believe joint this option Provide everyone ess will : p r ca nt �►cc the op�+artunaty to tee �.fti�e��� a. fou.. not to be safe this Ion provides is safes If it �s nd o.. L an opportunity to correct the current condition. If you are willing to amend the staff report to include requested c0nditiuf + r present this requested condition to for' ''hei;r' review t en we 'V111 +ef rain l annx n �,' Gn,T��1a 5Sl one' i r . continuance ,� aS��+`�ilg �ar a ... _ . m , 7Ve app eCii.A:,lie N�' our a3b�i►dL 03t�d��Ce tin this ma a lease cad e�.t;aor�r� Please :;a►t .�3 9 Ha t.ha Bishop, NPc Sub Commi t tee Chair CC Ed, Murphy, irector Community eve,lopmen Randy Wooley, Traffic 1 ngineer Dick. Bewersdorff, Senior Pl. n er Timothy V. Ramis, City Attorney Concerned Neighbor S RECARDI iNC CONOI T I ON 48 OF . TH STAFF Agyolt, UNAN OUSL �UPPt �' o,k�CRETE aN,ILC .IRB OVEL, . R /3 TONS a J WOULD ONLY W,Pi'Ol2L ' U tEi:$' igag IF IT COULD a QULUTF % 1E SHO FUNCTIONAL :O1R S .0 SAN HA .m.. W 0! IT' OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 ,Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639 -4171 LAC 1. C R,AL INFORMATION ROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION Hall Street T . ard Q on "'AX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. I S 1 35 pp TAX LOTSBi- ' 00 SIZE 1400 1.75 acres , 'TY OWNER /DEER HOLDEC*Da „vid & . n es ADDRESS 11565 S.W. Hall Blvd. PHONE 639 -- 9316 IITY Tigard O`i ~e oil ZIP 97223 APPLICANT *' De e 12 ' :t Co .� . ItDDRESS 111 S.W. 5th Ave. _ St.3850'PHOI 274 -8400_ ITY Po11_Ore90 ZIP 97204 When the owner and the applicant are different eople, the applicant must be the purchaser of reco :d or a leasee in possession with written authtirLzation •rom the owner or an agent of the owner with written uthorization. The owner(s) must sign this Pplitation in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this appx'[cation. PROPOSAL summARY The ow of record, of the subject pros art► request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (it applicable) from to , a and a Zone Change from :..�,� to OR ' he applicant .requests an amendment to the allowing sections of the Comprehensive Pisa or Community` Development Code .., CASE NO. OTHER CASE KO'S: RECEIPT NO.,� APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: /a C' DATE: ' 1'7' Application elements submitted:, / ) Application form (1) v°() Owner' s signature /written authorization C) -Applicant's statement pre -app check list) D) Filing fee (�?_') Additional information, for Compr,°.t- sive P Map Amendments /Zone Changes Maps indicating property location'(pre"app check list) (F) List of property owners and addresses within 250 feet (1) ssessor's Map (1) Title transfer, instrument (1) FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: � L COUP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: N.P.O. Number' Plana n Commission AP.-.. p roval Date: rimy variance m; 'conditin as as pa ,rt t tof th ? s applicati.ov-' ApPlic Uts: ` o have a aonap a pplicat dea 'rriberi in tI►e attached in ormation sheet a tie o n . I I: E 'P'LIC (S') SHALL CERTIFY''' the ab ®e re uest doe gas ghat,.: • ' v � not violate 'a,�a�r :dear %rl�str�eti�� ` � y be 'attached to or 'l.m osed { f l ceant will ` a ceir iee tie rig If � .the application . is Eranted, .����c� $pp ,` � � . granted in accordance. with . ,I the : �te!cros and subject to all the conditiona; and limitations of the approval. tao en‘ All of the above statements and the s ta.te5tents ixn the .. plot, plan., attachments, ' and , exhil4its transa!itted herewith, are true; an the ppiicents • so .acknowledge that .any permit issued, . bases otn'., t�hi application, my be relaoked if it is found ,the, any aUdb otantomennta ;are false. nl The applicant has ; read the entire, r, teats of , the . application, h tgc1tt iing,. the policies and criteria r.Ra, and understands the requirements for appra9`ritg . or dsnnyin , the. application. DATED this SIG NATUIRES of 0wnes husband and wife) of the subject prapartj or the City .,of, Tic ard. ' Oregon That t served notice of the Tigard. City CbUncil of which the, attached is a copy (Marked , Exhibit A) upon each of the named persons on the day of 1 9► to mailing to each of them at the address shown on the attached list! (Marked Exhibit S), said notice is hereto attached, and desposited in the United : States Mail the day of 19 , , 'postage prepaid 1 Prepared Notice , 14, dpOwoa 4∎ ; 0a d.f 14bScr•ib4',artd asworn to before me this 6 day of 1; . M 1)21A ' .. b'. rte b • pp+� . a "ar Sr Public of Oregon /j % /� �/q ...a., �y ~., Commission Ex y� 1F 9, 9 r VVYt``,14 My G a'.�ai^�w1 a III �iA.' 1 ' ,',ittlf ,kitpl,� filed'; Notice/Delivered to Post Office .sWorn to before me this w `day'' of l I' m 9 a' dry 'sbla is oaf Or�egor Nay Co mission Expiref Washington Cc",nty, Oregon (r. NOTICE OF Flint DRCISION . -> BY CITY COUNCIL . :.. Concerning Case Niumber (s) : CPA . 89 -0 Cc�n�errn � _ a • Name of Owner: Dr. David & Woodrow Hughes, William Name of Applicant: Bowen Devel2pment Co. . Address, 111 SW 5th Avg.....A_ALt3850 ,._._ City Portland State OR Zip 97204 . Address of ?roperty: 11505.11515 , SW 'Hall Blvd. , 11555 SW 88th Avenue Tax Map 3300 R ®Guest' • Action: and Lot Na (s) • „1Sg , 35DD tax lot 1400 and 181 4SDD t e lot A reguosst a ____ehensive Plan map Ahe ndment' Professional _Commercial , tt Medium Idic h Density Res 4 ttial and a zone change 11=1 "P. Professional C�oinmercial) to R -25 SResidential JA__gnitiskiaore for 1.75 acres. Al so a Comprehensive . Plan map amaadmeirrt from Medium - Densit Residential ones to Mediam- HLqhtDenait'z Residential and a < hane fcaon R -12 sidential, 12 unit8! t m to R 25 for 3.02 acres. The pb,ect g� parcels abut ,eac Approval as requested Approval with conditions X Denial for from • Notice: Notice was mailed. to: essooranmeemosl pubs s hed in the newspaper, posted at City Hall, , .and. The applicant and owner(s) owners of record within the required distance- The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization Affected gov R rnmental agencies . Final Decision: THE DECISION WAS SIGNED ON 6/26/89. BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON 612 8 The .:. adopted '. f ittdinge of fart, decision, and sts9ttement, of Conditl.c►nn can be obtained from the Planting Vepartment, Tigard City Nall, 13125 SW 'Nail, P.O. Box 23397, Tigalcdo Oregon 97223. A review of this decision may be obtained by , filing a notice ' g Board of Ap,Peals (LeaBA) according to with the Oie on Land ��se procedures. of intent the,their • OUESTIoHs : If You have aka questions p +� y order at 539- 44171. y questions, lease the 'Tigard Cit bkr /CPA8�9_04. BKPrd CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO 8i_ A RESOL0Tiow ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS' TO 'DENY 2,k, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 89 -04) AND ZONE CHANGE (2C 89 -04) 'REQUESTED BY HUGHES AND POSCO LANDS, ' INC... WHEREAS, the 'applicant requested a Comprehensive' ' Plan Amendment for a 1.75 acre parcel from Commercial Professional to ,Hedium --High Density' Residential and a Zone! Changes from C -P (Commer` dal Professional) to R -25 (,ReyRdential, 25 unitsacre) and a comprehen® .ve Plan Amendment for a 3.02 acre parcel from MediuM Density Re , Ldential to Medium -High ! nsity Residential and 4 Zone Change from R.-12 '(Residential, 12 unite /acre) to R -25 (Residential, 25 Units /E ;pre); WHEREAS, the planning Cc uu» ieeion heard the above application'` a\`: its me wting of May 2, 1989 and recommended denial; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City council heard the ' above application at its, regular meeting' of Hay 22, 1989. NOW THEREFORE, E, HE ,IT RESOLVED by the Tigard city Council that: Section /2 The proposal Ls not consistent with all irelevaat criteria as noted below: 1. Location Hughes property - 115 05 - 11515 SW all blvd. ( WB 1S21 35DX , tax lot 1400) and Pr+aco property - 11555 SW 80th Avenue (tid'cT°it• 1S1 3SDD, tax lot 3300) . 2. Background In €ormatio ► Both parcels • are within the original 1961 incorporation boundaries for th•Y City of Tigard. Planning DiviS ion records show • Daly one l'bpme at, application invoLving ' the parceler land use or dev® �pla vin, �sEther � of since that time. In 1988, tax lot 1400 was the parent parcel involved in Minor Land Partition MLP 85 -01 which resulted in the creation of parcel: of 0 ""4 acres (site of the Hinderease Learning Center) and /.75 acres (the present tax lot 1400). 3. Vicinity_ Information Propertie ,'I to the north and eaat of . the subject properties g y are coned �� i� and cont �_: in a medical �►Z ia�r buil.din � and a da care 9 venter on arcel® fronting ca p parcels r � nonconforming single on Hall �a�Alevarc� nuncranfor�s le family residences and vacant arcels which also have frontage, on Hall Houlerard, and three BBde'vel')Ped nrt> M parcel.a which are In addition, a mobile hems park is Located east' of tar lot 3300 on property ' toned R -12.. .. g ara rho in y is Iodated to the �uth Parcels. ro rt i d P� g center P Pe cen Southeast of the. eiu��c --c �1 ®w y e goib+sd G (General, commercial) The Plata Gardens aParttat ecmple RESOLUTION NO. 89- Page 1 loca. a 1,; to the ' west of tasx lot' 3300. his parcel is zoned R-12,3', / Properties. to the north oes t : and we - t of the sub ject prc pertiea contain single fausily residence` 'and ,d spleie_ *a and are zoned R -14.5 (Residential, 4.5 units /acre). 4. site., Information and Props gal II�e j tt on Tax[ lot 1400 contains two single faiani y residences which I are Beet Duck approximately 400 feet from HlaU .. Sou, /evard4 32 ; foot by 2 D ivot acceaaway, which contains 3'0 foot iii „jer. paved dg'iveway seerving both Kindercare and the ho. uses, connecter tax lot 140( ) with Hall Boulevard. Tax lot 3300 contains the 4.,2 unit. 'Park Place P parcel: ir.s :tlaerefere developed Gasacden A a�sn°tu'seentse on 3. �+2 acresg. The at a density in excess of 16 units Per act'-e. Access to the ai artmenta from Center street , ;,a via an approtiraatelY 40 foot wide by 300 foot long access drive which is located between t : the Tigard Plaza and Center Cult ahoPP+g centers' Parking lots. This Private road is known as SW 88th Avenue. ` applicant' o reheat that the Comprehensive Plan` `maP designation 1c6r' tags lot 1400 bee' a sendeed 1 froaaa' Profeaeional Coannercial to H I✓deseiium= igh Dmneity ,, s�sidleential and, the coning frost C -P t R 25 (Residential:,, 25 Unite/acre) T and al o that the P an snap designation. for tax' lot 3300 ' from Medium Density Residential to 84e!6',.u0-High , Density Reeidential atrac� the oa i.ng orax R -12 tc R- 5 n Th xeede®ignationa are roc, seetei in .. corder to al.l:ow went developiuent on tale lot 3400 and tc allots pons ibis fut redevelopment of tax lot 3300 at least its present eaaeity.. A,e presently seaneed, the apartfnentse on tax lot :.440,9, are conaidered nonconforming Use because thee pro developed : greater density than the gone ,..,w units 5. Agg,p0ya as i NPO Comments The Engi:deerif,sg Division has reviewed the proposal and 'offers the following comments' Under the current zoning for tax lot 1400, the pa eential exists for develePvl.mt of an office building of approxttat : =1y 1101000 square feet d The proposed zoning redesignatl on tO H- 25 would allow develop sent of a approzafueateely 44 a ` ent , 1ita on tax lot 1400. Potential p f full P a development u�de�;� the Pro Posed R 25 ��►� i g fun ar-� � , The tea�tia]. traff D� �__ i.n designat�.�aa ar4e , lest; than the Illotential impacts of 'full development ` Under th® current C -P roninlp NO analysis was provided regarding ; the potential iaspacte of the ” Proposed xedesignation of tale ]ot' 3500. Sanitary and storm <e Hers are available, to serve future development on" these propertiecm The Park, Place Gale apartments are pre entry served d by eaniterY and s tet0 semers. ' The ` ader uacy of theme facilities to serve future development proposal. RESo Page 2 Lu 4:k The Creg n 'state Highway Division reviewed the proposal and offerrrd no objections to the, ,proposed : redesigne tions ' ' TI a Highway Division, however, noted that, access impacts upon Ball Boulevard will heed to be addresEied through the review for a ny future development proposal on tax lot 1400. The Metzger Water District, . Washington County Fire District #1, an the City of Tigard Building Division reviewed the prt: osa1 an offered no comments or objections. No other comments were received. • Findin,,,and Cc.nclus ions The relevant criteria in t?;hlo case are statewide Planning Goals and 10; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.5.1, 8.1.1, 0.1.3, 8.2.2, and Chapter' 12, Locational Criteria; and the chang cu j map • nt criteria' of both' the o �ioial �a ams��ndmQ or �ei..�ta]se asi u Comprehensive Plan and .coax aunity Development. Code. The City Council concludes that the proposal' is consistent with the applicable statewide Planning Goals and ga'4Ldeline4 based upon ' the following findings': 4. Goal #1 is met because the ,City has adopted a Citizen Involvement program including review ,, f . all development app1icatimns by Neighborhood Planning Orgar.d.zatione (NPO) . In, addition, all public notice requirements have been satisfied for this application. 2. ;1 #2 is met because the city has applied all Applicable statewide Planning Goals City preheneive Plan 001A :dies. and Community Developments Code requirements to the review + . the proposal. 3. Goal. #10 is satisfied bec use the proposal will provide for h®usi ad g opportunities ae promotes by the Cityadditional oadditional n. ® ,� ,.Metropolitan Rousing liuZe Oregona �omaarehen0ive Fl in an and' the M Administrative Rules, Ch Ater 660, Division 7). ApprOva3. Of the proposal would inc=rease housing opportunities ors the City° n' p d to � 10.18 dwelling snits` per acre ail dQVelo able rQsidential Z�nd compared to the current 10 0 116 unite per acre. Approval worald also Provide increased opportunities for multi- fano►tly development. 'Only, potential houat.ng' opportunities on tali lot 1400 are included in xoadthis talc elation sine® ta m iot 3�0® y developed, cad ie a1 therefore is not included ire the pity s bgildable R land. The • po g eA Y ui u Cit a�iatuin a� nni. housing Zopportunity tate. for dOvelotabletl' of 10 unite acre 50 o rt�tni � a�ndsle Tamil: and and a minimum 50/5 P ty nlix .a & sing, ' y family housing. , The City Council e,s detained that the prOpoilkal is only, partially` consistent with, applicable nations of the ComprehendiVe an .bad upon,. the findings noted ;below: RES01!.JJTIO.; NO. Page 2 1. Plan Po11cy 2-1.1 is eatiefied heoatwae 'Neighborhood Planning Organization 2 and surroundi.ng property owners were .9;Lveaa• notice of the hearing and an opportunity to coant . {min the proposal. The, purposes of Plan Policy 5.1.3 will: tae urtcnered by the proposed redesignation because 'allowance'.,' o£ thcreaeecl residential • opportunities, within close proximity to the central business disetri'ct, which i.s approximately one quarter mile couch, ;-gay maake the . cents, „L busi.hes . di®trict wore economically Viable: because future , rerai.dents of the ' properties would I b anticipated :to' ut Lize nearby Oprametrcial and civic opportyanities within the central business district. In addition, redeaignata,on of commercial property outside Of but .1.ose to, thf ^cintral bueinese district may reduce the likelihood that a ?l,rN ,z rpas® new c uercial en t.srprine ,would coamercial develo ant Opportunities .within the 1 central busi.ne = a district. 3. Plan Policy 6.1.1, is t atiaa£ied because the prop: ®al woul i provide the opportunity for aadditiona a� Lai.ti- a ly de ►elopaient and :would increase the net houeing apportnYnity ova build me lands 1, in -the,'' city. Thie ire detailed ' i s tlh& di = cutssi; -~ a or Coa7l ' 10 above. The City of Tigard is Obligated though the Metropolitan ous ng Ru'le to provide for an egbn ]. housing opportunity, auk o£ sirngle family and multi •family units . wich an overall devel.opmeni, donaity unite por ac y "�°” °.•,�c3 ' that. au£��icient ,h ghee re. Th4 Cit� imu ®t �._, density areas are available so the intent of the tioueing Rule' can' be amt. The proposed redesignation would fu ^,thee the City° e' compliance with these requirements. 4. Plan policies 603.2, 6.3.3 and 6.6.1 will not _be satisfied 1t.ecanae the property location, • site, and configuration would allow £or redevelopment of the properties in ways fc)%'t may •be le5a cdmpat,l,.ble with adjacent e. =tablish d residential areas titan, the existing ones z�r cutvently permitted of the C -P Zone, tr st^ development of the parse a w ll, be ccub jest to n y some Within 100 `feet danei.t � liaaai�at of low _ r density reaident3al cone® aar lee wi ll be subject ` to s. tback, buffering, eize c� the capthg � nt ►. Howe ,.. because of the sa " P SC �' � •dcliff:i�..v�t to ®atis£�!' th' ;�. ha rG� a°t , i �. a. _ , Y b� ea3e Code re ir�oeat..ts. Yn11a3® this rat' on.,ng require . tassi add abutting, F Pe ned C -P bvid� add.ti oral setb l buffering tO io - at ie prea en -l.y nee eesiary,. 8;4 Plan Polis3kis 7 7.2.1, 7.4.4, and 7.6.1 are satisfied because adequate publid service rca►acities are ava =aTble to mere potential de' elopmont o4 the pr ► .0r,tiee3. Stogy ®ever and ea aittirgd ewer extensions will be neCeseaary try ®ex` "; £utaare development on tax lot 14o0. This can be accomplished a a condition of 6 vel�►ping. the sites . Plan Policy 7.8.1 is satie£ieed beOau de the Tigaird School Di. etri of Was informed of this proposal The . School District Is preeently constructing an addition to Durham E1ementarj school and IS also reviewing proposed change ` to school attendance boundaries. these actions are intended to a� le s� ate eve ecrow^ding in existing itESO%UT1C47i;+1 NO. Page 4 • t. cliserooms and' . to . prov de adda t of a� Y capaci growth in the .area. rve uture Plan Pol�1.cy.,8.1.1 ccmmitn" the C3'y :to' p]an; f a safe and:: eificieht street and roadway ©ystem that Meets., current ,:needs _ mind antiOipated•' futv;e arvelopaserst Thin polity would be 'eat'iafied because the proposed redesignation Of tax lot ,1400 would.�reduce i the anticipated traffic onto .* 1 . Boulevard. ae noted. 'by', the Engineering ' Divi ®ion and because any ',:additional,. traff. 'ic that ' might result fro m - Y redevelopment of tax ''lot, 3300' would not d�i.rect].y impact ark ar*�.arial or collector street. The Hngineering.,Dtvision will review any future development proposals 'ror;. either; of the propertie ,and may require improvements to affected public Streets to reduce impacts resulting EE M1 future develc pim-site. Plan Policy 8.;1.3' nrill be satisfied . an a '.,condition of a' roval -, of.. Policy PP any future rdevelo pme Boulevard may ' be required `.at tlhe t3.iae o of x:400. The City. a Engineering, Division'. an nt of the propert.ea. Necessary etreel improver nts to ''Hall development of tax l the Oregon state development proposals fir either of the properties. Plan Policy 8.2.2 'is satLtfied because' Tri-Met offers bus service on Pacific Highway, loss than one quarter mile from the. properties, and on Hall Boulevard, on which, tax lot 1400 ' has ' frontage. Therefore, the proposed . redesignation would locate an int aneive Highway : Civieion will review any future type of development 'within close proximity to existing public transit routes. 10. The Locational Criteria specified in Chapter 12 , of the Plan for Medium -High Density Residential use are not fully satisfied' for the following, reasons: a. The subject properties are not committed to low deneLty dev lopdmen:., but adjacent properties are.,, The necennary density transition, buffert.ng, and screening requirements of lahe Community Development code will not ,be . sufficient in Makin future uture developments on the propertia® compatible with. neighboring 'duplexes and single 'family residences as well ae, with other apartment developments. b. Tax lot 1400 has direct acceaa to Hall Boulevard, an arterial,` and indirect access t , Pacific Highway, Which also is functionally' classified an an arterial . Tax lot 3300 has ine asst access to bath Pacific Hxgkway and to Greenburg Road, a mrdor collector street. RESOLUTIoll k$O. Page .5 serious physical development lirvitatione'; affecting tl e. ' present or can be extended to eery future developments On prop'rt ea are not evident and lic facilities are :either n ttae propertied. However, the property ; ie limited in terra of x g .,.. g . p. .r .. iabove +datief in the b�i�ferin and com atibili�v • ieeue�t noted ; . �li w1 Public transit is available on both Ball 'F oulev�ard a Pacific Highway; within yeasy. walk .ng d 'stance of bat fro ert Les Convenience retail service is availa* .e near l y atong';;,Pacifid' ili ghway. Commercial -and business, centers are 10 sated within' lose proximity to .'tooth properties. f. °she Park Place Garde Apartments are presently provided 'itth a pe pa peen �ipa� o n pool. Wand - �thlitishat ..cu ®toraarly arse p � . , .. g no an�ecr.,eationa]. faci. , rovided ,wsith ' aulti ,family developments will be reguired., of future mug �i- f�i.ly, development on tax lot' 1400.. : No public opens, space ie located within the immediate v aifnf..y - :off these_ parcels. ..' an►endment to the :�P lan and *oning dicial _ ''it OH a�aoi u , , .c�, ®r<.1eac to, approv® q+ � maps,`the City a4ufit also find that 'there .is evidence of a change in the 'neighborhood or community which i�ffects ` the subject., ,,parcei.'. Alterna,tiively, tL s City must find :1rat there:: hats been a •�td .stake,, �L�r inconsistency 11140e*:, in the origins;. 'designation ' of the csel �; (Comprehensive Flan, Volume 2, Policy' 14,'44 H , implementation ' Strat0gy2'a Community Dev.s Opment C04e Section 18.22.040(A)) • For the subj,e p steels, it do®s not a pyear that a has beenmadc and a change a ..o f circtidatances 'tee ocwux3d The Council concludes gF he exi ®in g f and R...12 L2 one deeignat4 ;fine are appropriate for f;he; subject properties. Section 2: The city Council Jphold3 the Planning ComMission's recommendation for denim,; of the toaprehensive Plan Land Use Map and +Zone g Map Amendment as set forth in $ hibit "A°' (map). Section The Council therefore ORDFRr that the above referenced r � � DSNIBD• the Countw it ruETH 4 ORDERS that , the Planning : Oirecto7 end! the City, Recorder rend a copy of the Final order an ..1 .a Notice o Final decision to the parties in this cask). PASSED: Thisa 66 day of June, 9694 ATTESTI C ere As J'0b isO 4110 ourioi]. P reSiden Cathy Wheatl1Jy, eputy C y Recovder CPA89 -04. kl R sOLUTIoN NO 89 Page 6 , ... ti�v. AS yy44 MM [ y R :'� r FY. �, _ • 1 '"u + �... c i" tt� i a .Nth A °i ti. _ { �,i,.'.� .l •:I T _� .:G� � ,. _. ., '� .., �J.._ t.� _. .. K .,�.�_o bw�'i r '�.�:'�n 4, �. , i, , ,:.6'Y� ;J �. "'� -LMI �. i. 1DF. �.I� ., k+.Lia.. �� .. •i��' .. .4,,, `A':}.� � t.J. __ � 1y ��. ,, s.. +r_ ..� E 3611 I'. TIMOTFrY & YVANNE MCLOUGHLa i� C/O ROBERT MCLOUGHLiN 5400 SW ' 198TH AVF ALOHA,. OA 97007 3612 ..ANDRIO & FLORENCE HERBERHC'�` 9520 SW 90TH :AVE PORTLAND, iOR 97223 �IARTE MATHENY ' MZC HAS.. 'BRAZIL HE�aRYBY�Z�� 4334 SW 'BOW'!IANN PARKWAY POR°LAN1),. /JR 97223 1600, 1700. CLA tENCE & MARY JEAN BRAZIL PO BOX .23064 TIGARD, „ OR 97223 TOMMY & SUSAN''NEBERT 11530 SW LOMITA. AVE 'TIGARD, OR 91223 3614 LLLEN &i MARTHA' HOCKETT 115 00 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 LINDA HOOLEY 11470 SW LOMITA AVE' TIGARD, OR 97223 3616 RICHARD & LOWANA MURRA' 11440 SW LoMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 NIDA & REYNOLDS C/O DAVID HUGHES; PO BOX 673, SCAPPOSE, OR 97`056 1600 FAR WEST FEDERAL': SAVINGS C/O JENSEN, ThNINE BY M.L. KING 202, S.E.a SPOKANE. PORTLAND, ' OR 91202 1800 R ..7. BUTTER DENNIS THOMAS 11565 EW HALL, SUITE B TIGARD, OR 97223 . 3 603 ILIZABETH COSHOW'I 11425 SW , LOMItA .AVE TIGARD, OR 97223' SUN HOLMES 1itlo 5W MOPR SON' Sl. PORTLAND,, .Ot, 97205 KINDER 0/0 AVE DAVEtwate 7114 NE HAZEL 'D;11 AVE `. VANOUVEIR W'A 98665 CHESTER, & iAE K1OcC P.O. BOX, '23275 TTr AltO, O'R 4172. ' ROLAND '& MARIE 'SIMAitb '114 °55 SW LOMrTA E `i"t OJpi Cad,' 4 r r Q • 4 ICJ r,PC!I.V'', TIGARD7, PROPERTIES, ]�l, cfo :MILS] BROWN & R '`Lv.rr1ESON RT 2, BOX 4741 LA CENTER,. .WA► .98629. ARVIN & mATHXLDA MOLI 11547 SW; LOMITA TIGARD OR 97,223 3607, ANDREK � c FLORENCE HEBERFKOLZ 9620 SW 90TH AVE TIGA , OR 9'7223 3608. 3620 GtLADYS DAVIS 11815 SW SUMMERC[ .5T TIGARD, OR ° x'7223 3703 ROr RT SONNIES & GEO.'BQDNER c/o JEROME W. PARKER 5400 SW DOGWOOD LN POR'PLAND, OR 97225 3800 RICHARD LENA & RICHARD BAUER 11734 SW 90TH TIGARD, OR 97223 3900 LEONARD & MARC] E LiJOIE 11750 SW 90TH ` hVE TIGAIRD, OR 9723 4000 ELBERT & MARGARET HARRISON 11770 SW 90TH AVE TIGARb, OR 97223 4200 EVA L . 141LLEi2 11306 5W IRONWOOD LOOP Tlf D c7►R: �?T inLitt(l. TLANDit CHESTER E. c/m M.S. ; s NDE 9o& 7650 SW PORTL , AILI, Obi 97223 o• WI'LLIAI�f & ALVA `FRAEnL" 10730 "5w 85TH AVE PORTLAND, OR ` 97223 2 LEONARD & Lttlied.ARET DAMS 11470 SW C;iC:'"EABURG RD TIGARD, OR �3;n3 ..., -4403 ARMOND HORTON PO BOx 23186 TIGARD, OR 97223 4404 GLENN, MALKER c/o rim' 7 P 'J RRI ,P) BOX 23186 TTGARD, OR 972 4500 LEONARD & MARGARET DAVIS 11470 SW GREE NBURG RD TIGARD,`ARm'97223 4600 PHYLLIS & rREDERICK ANDERSON PO BOX 23006 TitliRD, OR 97223 4601 RICHARD & JANET ZEIDER 15300 SW ''133RD TIGARD,A OR 97224E 4700 TIGARD PRbbEsSiav L PO BOX 23006 TrGilizo c(s 4722, ENTER 12;5 mum I , f NW IRVINE ST; TLAND cR , 9721 ?►NET" E. BISS c/o ua NATIONAL ' 2004 NW i'2VI ST" PORTLAND, CR 97209 PHIL ` I q+, BOWETI ` D "N.4?,),, m law 7204;` ,MAR :` ' BRAZIL 11463 SW HALL BL' TIGARD, OR 9722: RICHARD MURRAY, 11440 SW LOMITA' TIGARD, 'OR 97223 H.M. BRAZIL 8x34 SST Bo MANN' PKWY TIGARb, OR e - 97223 WIN BOUSE 11 470 SW LOMITA:, TIGARD OR 97224" ,FFIDAvIT STATE, OF OREGON County of WashiogtOf, City of Tigard being first.' du depose and say Please Prim --- That I am a u\ C s�� cad, i)611,.i.i..±./1":!),Jzilf.:]E-I :Co Y The of Tigard Oregon.: : served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING for: at :C served NOT'•'' CE OF DECISION for f Ti and Planning Dirtctor C'�Ey a g "Tigard Planning Commission gardd Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Besting N otice /Notice of Decision) of ich is attached (larked , Exhibit '0TH°) was mailed to each named persons attached list marked erchib :t "B" on the said notice NOTICE Off' DECISION as hereto appropriate bulletin board on " the and dep l or the os %�:� in the United States , _l9 $L , postage prepaid. t ure. at ' 'the. address s! awn on :t e on a 0 , n Doerd P re son "tho posted on Dulleti �� (For Decision Only), iron who delivered to POET OFFICE Subscriued and sworn / on affirm to before re me ors N`0 T C l_ P 1 B t' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY colowc L, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, Mav .22. ' 1989 , AT ® PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL ,CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CPA 89 -04 TPO 2 FILE TITLE: Hughes /Posco Lands APPLICANT: Bowen Development Co. 111 SW 5th Ave,, S -3850 Portland, OR 97204 OWN) : Dr. David & Woodrow Hughes William Blue 11565 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Pasco Lands, Inc. 610 SW Broadway 3 -401 Portland, OR 97205 REQUEST: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89 -04 HUGHES NP0 2 A request for a Com P rehenoive Plan map amendment from Profeasional onal Cc; nercial to Medium dium High Density Residential und a zone change from C-P (Professional Ccsmercial) ) 1.75 acres. a Comprehensive - Al.eo, to R-25 Reaid ©ntf.al, 25 units/acre) for map y -H3.gh Density it Residential to E�,�dium Residential ma amendment azone change fro a R -12_ (Residential, 12 units /acre) to R-25 Re ®idential and g -Z for 3.02 acres. The subject parcels abut each other. LOCATION: 11505-11515 SW Hall Blvd. (WCTM lot 3300) 1400) LOCATION: - SW 88th Avenue wCTM(S1 35DD, tax �. 11555 S ( 35t�0, 00) 18 tax la (Nee Map on Rev-eic�se Side) _ .. .:: .. ACCORDANCE WITH "I�HE THE PUBLIC HSA�RING C�N THIS MATTER WILL BB CONDOCTES R CODE AND RULES OF PC'tOC! JURE AVAILABLE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY D CITY �� � OR RULES � OE?' ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND CT PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANY PERSONS HAVING, I INTEREST 1'N THIS WRITx'NG TO T HIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED ENTERED INTO THE RECORD. . .. � PLEASE cozdTh�s iBLVD.��GARb,� QRB�►i�' 9723. FC)R FURTHER INFORMATION O TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 AB3. i$'d' 9- 4171... , I AT 63 ,� blkm /CPA89 -04 . BEM -miwitLimMaMM■NIMEN DR. DA TIMMS! G YVONNE MCLOUGHL:TN C/O ROBEIt,T , McL00GRLYI 5400 SW 8TH AVE ALOHA, OAR 97007 3612 ANDR:? 1 & F +OR NCE HERVERHOLZ 9520 SW 9020 . AVE PORTLAND. OR 97223 3613 POMMY & SUSAN ' NEDEEZ7` 11530 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 3614 tsLEN & MARTHR HOCKETT 11500 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 400 PRES/DENTS ONTGOM!1IY, ALABAMA 36116 1'.;500 ;ARIZ net. *� IHL BRAZIL HENRY BRAZIL 8834 SW ,HOHMAN N. 'PA1 PORTLAND, OR 97223 1600, 1700 ClaitPNCE 'e MARY PO O BOX 23064 TIGAPD.2 OR 97223 1800 NIDA. A EARL REYNOLD C/O DAVID HUGHES P0 BOX 673 SCAPPOSE, OR 97056 1600 PAR WEST FEDE lAL SAVINGS C/O JENSEN, JANINE BY M.L. KING 202 S.E. SPOKANE._ PORTLAND, OR 97202 3615< LINDA MOOLEY 11470 SW LOMITA AVE' TIGARD, OR 97223 1616 RICHARD & LOWANA MIDRRA 11440 SW'r LbMITA '1VE TIGARD, 011'172i 3617 CU■ES�.TERr ■i &wY/M {�ArE /y KLOCE '232 I: 5 IttAft6 riff R . J . SUTTER DENNIS THOMAS 1156:5 SW HALL; SUITE B TIGARD, OR 97223 3603 ILt ZAHE'2 H COSHOW 11425 SW LOMITA A TIGARD, OR 97223 RO AND ' & MARIE SIMARD 11455 SW LOMITA AVE arG ott, erriz czAws DA S 11€15. SW EST` TIGARD, OR 97223 3703 ROBERT SOBS & c/o JEROME W. PARK} 5400 SW DO OD Lid polITLAND, OR 97225 3500 RICHARD LEh1A &e "RICHAF 11734 SW 90TH TIGAMD CR ` 97,223 c./o Fes' 7 +' E TERPRISCS P0 23aa.6 . T CARD, Ca ; 9722.! 4500 LARD & MARGARET DAVIS 11470 SW G ENBE G.; RD TIG iRD, OR 97223 ' 3900 LEONARD & MARCIE LPJOIE 11750 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 4000 ELBERT MARGARET HARRISON 11770 SW 90TH AVE TIGA /RO OR 97223 4601 RICHARD & Jai 2EIDElt 1530 133RD TICARD A OR 97224 420f) EVA L. MILLER 11306 SW IRONROOD I TTGAID D 3620 GLADYS;DAVIS 11815 SW SUMMERCIIEST , TXGARD, CU 97223 ROBERT SONNES & GEO. ROBERT SONNES &`- GEO. BOONS R c/o JEROME W. PARKER 5400 SW DOGWOOD tbi PORTLAND, OR 97225 3800 RICHARD LENA & RICHARD BAUER 11734 SW 90TH TIGARDr OR 97223 GLENN MA,L= c/o FBF 7 F ENTimPltSE .PO BOX 23186 TIGARD, OR 97223 4500 LEONARD & MARGARET ;DA' 11470 SW GRRG RD TIGARD, OR 97223 3900 LEONARD & MARCIE LAJ•IE 11750 S w 90TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 4000 ELBEAT & MARGARET HARRISON 11770 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 4200 EVA L. MILLER 11306 SW IRoiMOoD LOOP TTGARD Ojt 400 PHYLLIS & ,FREDEC PO BoX 23006 TIGARD, OR 97223 4601 RICHARD & JANET ZEIDER 15300 SW 133RD TIGARD,A OR. 97224 4700 TIGARD PROFESSIONAL: CENT] PO BOX 23006 T, 011'.. 11'7 STATE OR OREGON County of Washington" City of,, Tigard That I am a \,,..:_+; "'! on.. The City .of Tigard, Oregon... That I served NOTICE OF' ,"PUBLIC NEARING for: That I served NOTICE OF DECISION ,for: City of Tigard Planning Director .........._Tigard Commission �Tigard Planning Tigard: Hearings :Officer Tigard City Council ' A. cosy (Public (fearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of l'rhich is attached (Marked Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named persons at the address shown on .t a exhibit ""B'" on \the 7? day of Vii► lg= attached list marked sac attached said notice NOTI S OF DECISION as hereto ,A attached, o riate bulletin board on the day of w;13 . ,.; appropriate p pp r, in � =�.,�' " ' dad► of and deposited i the United ,States' ` Mail on the 19 P prepaid. postage p P n uu Person vho posted on Bulletin'Board (For Decision Only) o de vered to OST OFFICE 'r w, 4 t� �n� ,c "4•w� Q mission Expires NOT IC 11 O:F PUB I C E3BARLRG NOTICE IS aEREBY GIVEN THAT TSB TIGARD PLANNING n ISSIOW, AT ITS MEETING ON TUESDAY, Mats 2.. 1989 AT 3 PM, N THE TOWN HALL 9E TH1lIG LL CI C �M , CENTER, x.31.125 SW HALL BLVD �, , TIGARD, , FOLLOWING IAPPLIChTIONs FILE NO: CPA 89 -04 / ZC 89 -04 NPO $ 2 FILE TITLE: Hughee/Poeco Lands APPLICANT: Bowen Development Co. 111 SW 5th Avg':-, 5- 3850 Portland, OR -V204 OWNER: Dx. David a Woodrow Hughes William Blue 1+1565 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Posco Lands, Inc. 610 SW Broadway 5 -401 Portland, OR 97205 REQUEST: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89 -04 HUGHES /POSCO LANDS NPO # 2 A request for a comprehensive Plan map amendment from Professional Commercial to Medium High Density Residential and a sons change from C--P (Professional fes®i Cowmerciai ) to R -25 (Residential, 25 unite /acre for 1.75 acres. Also, a Comprehensive Plan map amendment from Medium - Density Residential to Medium- High` Density Reeid;tial and a zones` change from R -12 (Residenti 1:11 KAROL C 14 IA AVL- z - - R. ;DAVID ' & ,G,X7ODROW !HUGH?" WILLIAM • BLUE; 11565 SW ILL BIND TIGARD,. OR 9722 3 1 INDERT CARE � sly ,��TI�iG CENTERS, INC' • 2400 PRESI7) NTS MONTGOI4ER , ALPOAPIA 3611 TIMOTHY & YVONNE MCLOUGHLIN d/0 ROBERT MC"LOUGHLIN 5400 SW 198TH. AVE ALOHA, OR 97007 3612' ANDR3740 & FLORENCE HERBERhOLZ 5520;SW 90TH `AVE PORTLAND, OR 97223 3613 TOMMY & SUSAN NEBERT 11530 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 3614 EN & MARTHA HOCKETP 11500 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 1500 MARIE MATHENY MICI"AE BRAZIL HENRY BRAZIL.. 8834 • SW HOHMANN'' PARKWAY PORTLAND.,. , )R 97223 1600, 1700 CLARFNCE & MARY JEAN BRAZIL PO BOX 23064 TIGARD, OR 97223 1 +YY'A HOOLEY 11470 SW LOMITA AVE, TYGARD, OR 97223 NIDA & EARL REYNOLDS 0/0 DAVID HUGHES PO BOX 673 SCAPPOSE, OR 91056 1600 PAR' WEST FEDERAL SAVINGS C/O JENSEN, , JANINE BY M.L. ! !TING 202 S.E rSPOKANS; PORTLAND, OR 97202 I �:isNI S THOMAS 1 `�+E5 SW HALL, SUITE 'B TIGARD, ` OR 97223 RICHARD & LOWANA MUzR?Y' 11440 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223' CHES TER & MAE KLOCK O. BOX 23275 VIGARD, OR 97223 ILIZABETH COSHOW 4425 SW' 10!,:0A AVE `TIGARD, (50 11722'3 3604 P 1 ROLAND, & Ml+RIE SIMARD 1145'5, SW' LOM'i Avis TIGARD, O' 47223 1RVID ` & MATHILDA MOLI 1547 SW LOMITA 97223 03607 ANDREW & FLORO NCE HE 3ERHIOLZ`' 9620 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD: OR 97223 3620 GLADYS DAVIS. 11815 ��.. i,1 St1MMERCREST TIGARD; OR 97223 3703 R0 3ERT S NNicS & GEO. c/o ‘7EROME W. PARKER 5400 SW LTOGWJon Ll PORTLAND, OR 9722:) 4404 GLENO MALKER d o FBF 7 F ENTERPRISES PO BOX 23186 TIGARD, OR 97223 4500 LEONARD & MARGARET DAV1► 11470 SW;GREENBVRG RD TIGARD, OR 97223 3900 LEON ARD & MARCIE A+�70IE 31750 S'etf 90TH AVE L TIGARD, OR 97223 4000 ELBERT & MARGARET HARRISON 11770 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 4601 RXCHARD & J'ANET 2EIDER 15300 SW 133RD TIGARD,A OR 97224 3608 ktdr\aitt & Vlore:nee L. Rerheirho lz 9620 S.W. 90th , Portland, Oreigoat 9/293 8620 C11adye Davie I 1 1 5 S.W. 9-issumelrezieet Tigard, Oregon 97223 3703 Robert A. Sonnet: & George H. Bodeier c/o jetioolee W. rark.fer 5400 S.W. Dogwood Lan* Portland, Oregon 97225 3800 Leua, RSPItard T. & Riehaz,r1 W. Dauer 1ii.734 S.A. 90th TIgard, 02,0cfati 97223 3900 Leonard M. & lit.re,1•2 A. Lajoiit 114'50 SW. 90th Paitenuct Tigard, Oregon 97223 4000 81,1)erst Z. #72 Margaret R. Harrison 11770 S.W. 90th Street Tigard, Oractort 9722:2 4200 Eva L. Miller 11306 S.W. ix•onwiaed Loop Ti grard, 01fillffOrt 072V3 4300 Elroy 41.Prosch 3540 N. 119th Portland, Oregon 011/220 W ,ll at M. lard `Alva. • Frahler 10730 S.W. 55 Avenue or'tla i Ori &gon ` 97223 4402 Leonarc S. and .Margaret N. Davis.' 3.1470' S.W. Gr�eenburg .Road Tigard, Oregon 97 2 2 3 X403 x■rmond G. Horton 1)40. Box 21186 Tigard, Oregon !9'i 4404 Glann 'Walker o !o F'IF & F Enterprises P.O. Box 23186 Tigard., Oregon 97223 4500 Leonard S. & Margaret a . Davia. 11470 S.W. Green urg /toad, Tigard, Oregon 97223 4600 Phyllis ie & Frederick ck A. AnderaJn P.O. Box 23006 Tigard, OR. 97223 4601 Richard W. & Janet .E K. Zeider 15300 S.W. 133rd Tigard, O . 91224 Tigard Professional onal Center .©. Box 23006 Tigard, OR. 97223 ;. James ';eLi Castles e p Corp. 10125 S.W. W Beaverton Beaverton, OR. 97005 Frank Dorn 11975 S.W., Pa Tigard +R: 'Z MAR 23 ,s9 11:: 32 BOWEN/PDX; TIJC 81UH0ER: (503) 374- 4505' FACSIMILE TRAsMZTT NU$ 83R -' OF , FACES INCLUD'LNG COvnR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: ALL PAGES ABS NOT RECEIVED ASE CALL (5o =ME 274-8400 AND ASK ?OA f A dt a ! ciiiaty C`q� Uonreen 'l!L t � i + p�AHltt Cw`o �Al11tiH1yj �A�1' r� '� � �FiPe�i �Y4►iWi:�r I�KNfw.,.i 'J�11A �'M%M:� 4 i(h1f 'A"! xi+ MAR 23 '89 *ALL BTU*T RRZOWZ APPLICATION Ogre Within 250 Past of *all Utrast property 521/4 8111 /4 920710* 35 71$ RIW TAX LOT WsrMr a Dneatss$ OS' OWW2R ieoo *sr Nast Irsderal Savings c/o Jansen. Janine N Tr' BV N.Le King 202 S.X. Spokane Ore. 97202 10(A1 Gordon T. P! • a c/o Na 5aauel a <Janet, 1!3215 'S 3 d Avenue Pt►rti , . , Ore. 97219 1800 R.J. Sutter Dennis ; Thomas 11865 S.W 4 Hall, Snits R Tigard, Ore. 97223 8ao3 Elizabeth I. CouhaW 11425 S.N. Lomita' Avenue Tigard, Ore. 97223 3604 Roland J. S Maz,ia Siaasrd 11455 5.N. , Lomita Avenue Tigard. ors. 97226 3605 Gordon A. a Oheryl A. Sartrtn9 11498 8.'N. Lorita Ave. Tigard. Ore. 97223' 3801 *ova 3'. Root 11513 S.N. Lomita Ave. Tigard. Ore. 97223 2507 Arvid H. �i_Nathiida C. Moline 11547 !.W. .0aita ,Ave. Tigard. OregOn 97223 3809 Virginia E Dale. at *1 A1. NackinnOn. yen g, Ails State 1`1025 8410■ LOai .e AVe. T3gaxai,� Or9. 99223 .2 0 I- A , MAR 23 !Be- 11i3S BOWEN /PDX 3011 Tiaotf R. 0 YyoDne 1.0W/hi/A,. 1lobeirt C. McLoughlin 8490 1.N. 198th Ave. Aloha: bra. 01007 3.612 Writs a. 9 ylorande L. Herberholz 9120 S.N. 00.h Ave: !arty, AOrei. 97223 3613 !oa*y i H v y R Sunlit\ S. xabe'gt, 11630 '111,W., ` Loalta Tigard, Ore. 97223 3614 Alan 9 Marti* 1. Haoltett 11500 S.W. Los to ),V4. Tigard. Ore. 9729.3 3418 Lit da C. Hocley. 116 ?0 9.w. Lo9 to rd AV►'u. Tiga. Ore. 9 ?22:1 3616 H* 1 ch:ZA 0.' & L'�� r 11660 $.01. Laait$ Ave. Tigard, Ore. 97226' 3617 Pchastaer 23? Block Tigard. Ora. 97223, 9011 *n. tir 11310` 8.111.1 Laagta Ave: Tid: Ore, 97223 3703`' tcb:rt A. So ee ®aorpe H ecdnsr c1`o Jeroie N: parkrer 0400- S.W. DogncCao tittle Portland, Ogre 9r l2iP1 P.3 901 /6, 331/6 5152/ON 35 TIN 'dr 1011 TAX LOT 100 Gordon ti? PApkln U t 4eeee1 N. Stanek M. 2o1*tei l2216 e.11. 33rd wI. Portland. 0*3. 97319 1001 Ninder7Cnre morning Conti/roe Inc. 5650 Presidents Dr. Wontgca ery. Alabaia 90115 11100 Merle IMtbeng K chigel 1ren11 Ienry sra011 rea6 ..;� Parkway Porti30 W. °Vegan 92933 609, clan nce & Nary Jean Brasil 1'1155 •.o. 73096 Tigard. Ore. 97223` 1300 Klan, r. * sari Reynolds c/o Davla gaghos P.O. Sox 673 ncappoee. Ore. 97064 SEEIMP IS I 2001 AS2 AC MCA 3301 $c 4403^ Co. Rd Na 17d� -6t T AVE1IUSE;"a -�. No+o *a s��.rs yy7 sI 1"42.ta11f Lo *NM* i AN air BA Tigard Panning D CPA '891 -84 SHED A ;request: for a coaaypr h+ensive plan map a idm4ent fr Professional rcial' " to Medium High "�v, nsity Pssident ia�i and a so change fro C m-P (Profss©t na l -to 11 -25 (Resida itial, units /acre) for '1.15 acres. LOCATIONS 11305 -41515 SW 'fall Blvd. ;,(WC 181 i -3DD, tax lot 1400) pp Attached fey the bite 'flan, 'and 'a liatant � statement'; for Your, rosrieti. f"�Oa► information supplied Eby vauriout d.P., fonts. and ag.rcier and` "from , ;.+tithe information avai.labl(e to our staff, a, report `a��sd ` recommendation will prepared and a decision will be rendered. on the Proposal in , the near future. If you wish to -coardent. .thin this application, we need ,lreur,:cassasitta br ,fib . "25 198. You ,,May, use the space provided below or ' attach a ,scoparater +letter to return your coaaments.' , �Y°.-= 'r...un !ie tp ref one- by thi , a . y date. please p'nono the staff 'contact note*: below with your canimonte and confirm ',Our comments in writing as soon as : 110aeitile. _ you ,;have any :question cegsr�a�.r�► this swatter, contact the ,Tigard Planning Bepartpent, PO BOX 2319 ?;, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, 0R 97223. PHONE: 639*4171:. STAFF colvf CT: „„„,w • PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have cowl:awed tho proposal aAd have no v bjectIona to it Please contact of our office. �. immimmitu6111Weimi Please refer to the ` inclosed letter. Written Comments; of Person Coimnentinga Phone Number: bkm /CPA09 -04.8 M (T .00 0. a NOTIFICATION, LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS • NPO No. 2 copies) '1 ci N • CITY DEPARTME4TS , _ Btitilding Inspector/Brad R. Parks & Recreation Board/Cuiris S' Police CI. Rect);1: , • SPF.,'CIAL R.I.CTS ire,,District. bldg) Tigart; W.D. , 8841 SW cosnin/arcial T ,rd, OR. 97223 Metzger W.D. 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR. 97223 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis Kevin Martin Joann Rice City of Beaverton % Jim Ileadryx 120 Box 4755 - 4755 SW Gr1.11ith Beaverton, OR 97076 Stat.e Highway Diviaion Lee Gunderson PQ Box 565 Beaverton, OR 97075 ▪ SPECIAL AGENCxES L-,etneral Telephone and Cenetal Electric cSherr IBeaverton Brian More --- 4155 Cedar Hill17Bli9r. Portland General Electric Bob Olsen 97005 14655 SW Old Schos'Perty 12460 SW Main 97223 Eeavert:ons, OR 97007 • • School Dist. No. , 48: (13eztvereor!.) Joy Pahl° I ' PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR ,97075 Chool :Dist. 233 (Ti'gard) 13137 .S Paci.fl.c, T1-igard, OR. 97223 I I Other Boum?tory Commission 320 SW sark Room 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 METRO 2000 SW let Ave. Portie.,nd, OR 97201-5398 Other wwwwwww,wwww,ww,:ior rwwwwwwwowwww orthwst Natural Gas Ronald D. PolVi PE, ?LS 220 N1,1 SecOttdiAVe. ttl d OR 97209 Metropolitan Area Oommunicetions Tdit Oaki; technia ogy Center 1815 NW 169th Place, S-6020 ealtertonj OR 97 Ocr-;4886 . • ............tPti..iti.......H.:•1■1■',JitthOe..0t.H0011,::' '..... Ottiet.••,',........-..,.........•,.....,•'....-.....,....,...............-.....,............• ....•.• .......•• .,• . . • . , . . . . . , ., . . . • . . . . . . . • .., _ ..;.......,„,..,.. ••• .,• • ....„ . .........,....„...,......,,..............,......„._••••••_••.•,•••••• • • • - . ......... __I_ ....... , ..• •-• •,.......••••-...,-.,:..,-..., ••......!.....,-„..,..,:•,..1...L•.!...............„..............., ,. • •••.• .1.. ...., ......,..... :..1,....••,..'•'...(.•10..$70440(60111,:,.1',i(RV118,:9•••)11:,..,........,...:••••••'....1,...,..••...,.....1...11'''..1•.•1•....'•,.1•',.•11.,;.•••,...:•'...',....,••....„'.:L..i..•..',•"'......,..•.....::... Southern Pacific Transportation Company '::ouane M. Forney, FLS - .Project 'Eng ;peer 300 NW 6th Avenue, Room 324, Union Station. Portland, OR 97209 1800 Nxi1, & EARL, REYNOLDS HUGHES 1LAV/t1 �?O ; 0X 673 SCAP'OSE; OR 97056 1600 NTDA & EARL REYNOLDS C/O DAVID HUGHES PO BOX 673 SCAPPOSE, OR 97056 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.; P.CJ. BOX 23397 . yr 1i�Cai9, Oregon 972, ?,, t. en effiDd AS ANC' 1800 I NTDA & ARL..:;F.E?NiOLDS C /O`' DAVID HUGHES :FUSED PO BOX 673 ' ; iy [•._+ SCAPPOSE, OR 97056 I .. ; �yy4 "Fr� i�ieIi:eaIJIl Ili t il�ofa r. imam- Liftable. Box 23397 on 97223 223 3617 CHESTER & MA�E KLOHIC P .0. BOX 2322.5. TIGARD, OR 97223 Ofidelfverable At Addressed i , SLE TO hotWARI 1 b 111111111111iiitl1 fiIII i11i li t irki It 8• Oro .0 4 out -tu ldings. She said a'she wou Decision. She: ;`further advised ,she` Attorney, to, revisit' the -Code, to cler l Uses';. in the' 'ipplieable ection." Shoty l decid to allow ''this use, . she re iuestd ; a be required. ort the 1Dz,,� ector!s lying for" ;` the�` city. °n 4 the c outright , permit;ted e majority .of ' Counc'il Site Development . Review Councilor' Johnson advised she . °bel lever d there Were ' twro obligations on the part of the City: 1 e .prtt.ection_ of the inteteity ''of` 'the ra .idential area, and- also 2) C1 arif i+ ation of `.'ambiguous la;aguaSe for the property owmer who purchased property believing the nursery was a permitted use. e would favor a Site Develo metlt Review to Place 'a She said she would ,, P restriction on the activities •occur*'is on the property which were not consistent with a residential area. Mayor Edwards advised' he agreed the Code was not clear on this issue, but he felt this use was not ociilPstibl.0 With ;a residential area. He advised he would support t* holding the Director', s decision. 14e also requested the City Attorney review. the Code with regard to the language clarification Issue.' ▪ Public hearing was closed: • Motion by 'Count -iior Eadon, ` seconded by Mayor Edwards, ; to uphold the Director's Decision: The motion passed by a majority vote; Mayor 'Edwards ,and Councilor Eadon voted "Aye, Councilor Johnson ' voted "No, Councilor Schwartz abstained. rK R t 1 � R.i ° u Ut +�.i� rrta, ` SAj, ,a to PUBLIC BRING ` cOP REHEPTSI' PLlt11 .11l�E EIet ' `+CPA " 9 a` H S%L Sco i DS''tlPO' 2 A request for a Comprehensive Plan map amendment from Prof essi onal Commercial to Medium 14igh Density and a zone change from C -P (Professiotal Cominercial) to R -25 (Residential, 25 units /acre) for 1.75 acmes. Also, a Comprehensive Plan " map .ameadlieat from Medium- Density Residential to Medium -High Density ReSi.dential 'and a zone change from R < -12 ('Re_ s dential 12 units /acre) to R -25' for 3.02' acres. Tre subject p . CAN 11505 -11515 SW dial 1 a 35DD Tax t , 35D ., arcels a'DUt LC)CATZ Tmx 1Lot ,400) and Zf.555 SW 88th Avenue 4WCTM 1S , OO) a • Pu611c hearing was opened. ,: sir challen ' es. There were 116 o declaration s Summation by Senior Planner "den* On May '2, 15189 ti the Planning Commission reviewed ''' the proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan, map from Professional Commercial to Medium -High Density residential And to a' end the zoning from C--P (Professional Comrhnercial) to R -25 . (Residential, 25 ,. units/acre) � s�� currentes x150 llid The � . e) for . 5 ac 515 SW xtal�. ' � property. was li►' located ! at 5 -11. Fage 7 c oi*CIL MIMITES MAX 1989 veloped -w tea, %wo rsin r e fancily t °dosidnnc 1s0 , request d was a e residential to Hedium High 0� from' R ='2, (Residential, 12 an ► amen ns3,t' A.ana located at 11555 .Sµ set h , ven developed with,;' a ' 49-unit Y,apactmen involved' i ° the, applicaf ion abut.. S n uate fCOrn:J r E►nt'�.a1 fed at um- Hig1`: `Dens,+ irodhe rchan 3.02 " acr ras , current . o° property second parcel complex.' T6, The Plannng, Co* stssoI� ", recommended denial': planning Commission' �� i e�: rnmendation for denia`; This would create " s zone. hev change ttrou id create problems j knees.' . R -25 zoning ,s ould no e adjacent to �ooOS was based, ion a goenn ..0n in roper Lot 3300 iss . turrent. ove1,'aped; close to t!ie designation. • Public Testimorrty Proponents: o Phil Hedrick, 111 SW 5th, Portland, Oregon,. Mr.> Hedrick noted Dr Hughes wanted to develop the , property but had . been unable, to +w,rork with other property ;owners in negotiating the details " Hof , a sale. Further, he advised the zone change requesi� was to "allow' the property located , at 11555 SW Beth 'Avenue. • eOnform to its present use. The redesignation was requested!, in order to allow apartment development, on Tax Lot 1400 and to allow possible future redevelopment Of Tax , Lot 3300 to ` 'at least ltt,1 present densit3r. As presently zoned, the apartments on Tax lot ,3300 ,wec considered non.-GOnforming use because the. parcel was developed" at a greater density than the; zone permits. Hr. Hedrick noted:', 'he had not received any offers four the property' as currently zoned. . o!isoo>nent3 „ o Richard Hurray, 11440 SW Lomita, Tigard, Oregon advised he a was in 'opposition to the request by the applicants. He cited concerns with problems, experienced becawae of the existing apartments,„ noting a disproport ,orate 'azr►oun,�, • of. malice call , and drug related problems. He adyi�sed that furtoe+r development og apartments would disrupt their quiet neighborhood O Joint Boise, 1Yµ470 SW Lomita, Tig;acd . ` Oregon, testified, lives b d the subject b property- He sed he did e chin soul th e is built because of problems W1 want to see mor�. aps.rc.:nen had been experienced because of the current apartments. Page 8 = c iNcI[A MINUTES HAYS 22, 1909 11 r • 41 • Recommendation by Community " Development Sty f f': Community Development Director ° noted "st:,� ff recoimnended Cou'ncil, °approval the proposed plan: zoning map amend cnts;. Council estions and Comments :. o Co Wncilor. Schwartz toted traffic .problems ud his ;iloncere► that an increase in density ` to R -25' would ,exacerba .e 'the se problems . , He advised he would be recommendin* . to `!'phold the Planning.. Commission decision' for denial of ,the proposal t o Councilor Johnson advised' .she' would be willing: to consider the rezoning of Tax Lot 3360 ∎ tiic;h; was now none - conforming to the higher density of .R -25. Councilor Schwartz commented that,'by changingl this to R-25, the': existing proparty.could be upgraded to the maximum and he would prefer to, see it be left at R -12. the . R -25 rezoning would go a .3inst trAe,! Cm., ►nc�.loc Eadon noted g g !� previous ; policy of transitioning zotning so r' .that zones , such is R -4.5 and R -25 do not abut. She advised she would be recommending to uphold the Planning Commission' decisi in. o Mayor Edwards noted he agreed with thel comments prk- sented by the Councilors ant noted he was also concerned about traffic impact He advised he was" concerned about the area, `and the. probe en the apartment complexes have . caused. He .not�pd he would be supporting the Planning Commission recommendation. o Council6r Schwartz noted he was in sympathy with owners who had been unable to sell their property; however, Counci.1 could;' not` rezone land because an owner cannot market the property. . Mr. Hedeick requested an opportunity for rebuttal of the remarks. He noted the Development Code sets forth buffering'regmirements; this request meets, those requirements. he also disagreed that traffic impacts would increase 1becuuse of the rezoning request. Councilor Eadon responded that the buffering, issue was different from the Council policy of transitional' . zoning. A 3O -foo$r buffer would not be adequate between R -25 and R 4:5; it would 'be 'snore in density R: 25 and R-4. desirable to have descending ave a descend ensit betwreen . Public Hearing was Closed: . Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Johnson, the Planning Commission dec °4sion to. deny the 'proposal:. to uphold The motion Was approved by a Unanimous vote.`of Caunt*ia present,.' PUELIC HEARING PROPOSED LOCAL IMPROVEMENT , DXS'"RICT ' (LID) CONSTRUCT STREET AND UTILITY IMPRO VENTS TO SERVE THE PACIFIC CORPORATE CENTER PROPERTY: The proposed LID will include the Pae3.f is Corporate' Center, property; .i adjoining rights -of -way of existing and proposed roadways, including, proposed street connection ' to Bonita Read, )2nd Avenue, Upj Pa"" e y '� e"OUMCIL MIlUTES MAY' 22, 1989 'I S er,. 5.I Boones Ferry t�� `Lanai Interstate Hi hway'''� 'total es imated oos design and''crinsti uctii�n K is `$2 ►,166. S The ,'full oost . "ofa design air construction of -, w, L e' �sessed agitii' all pcopdrtie •wrsthin th proposed' local improveiw nt district on ' a;� area oasis except pu rights -of -way• Tile purpose 'of the , hearing Sts' vo r fear remonstrances. objections to the formation of the LID:: t� blic'', hearing was opens There ;were;`no declaratlions!"or, challenges Community Development Director summarized thisM agenda item. He reviewed ;the proceas ate. This l public 'hearing was for ' the purpose of d� cidi ,' ;whs they or not to form the proposed LI© Not ces" were. °s' 'sent to ,property owners on' Hay 10, 19$9. •Although not required - by ordisnance, notices of the public hearing were also tent,: ;the owners . of the' properties ad oining ,the ',proposed LID: He adv ised that Hr.° `John Smets wha owned property adj cent to the . apes ,,trust property, Wo 1d not be assessed for , the .proposed tID . ' Community DeVelOPment ,Director, noted' he recovrie ended approval of the proposed ordinance forming. the ..ID., He a,11.so advised that Dave Larsen Was ava fable 'or .questions by CounOil should' "the have any concerns regarding the engireeting report Councilor Eadon asked if the traffic en "`�i.neerin re Port had e z eceived in it y, r y g p, p ben . its -entirety., et Communzt Deveo met�t Director responded • yes.. --- there was nothing, further' to be added to the ngineering report:. Testimon Y Pror anents. Leon Hartvi.ckson, Pacific Realty, A ' �v enue, 6 ,Portland, Oregon, reviewed the :issues Which had been. brought forth to date;. He advise d that he Would, like to reserve ate opportunity to respond to remarks by 'the, opponen+; c r . Mr.:iartvickson reviewed the follfrt,W& tg ; ssues a impact .. ti":t ,development . o Economic and expectations of o The proposed road would be the same width as SW 2nd Avenue. O The development would represent a park= -Tike entironn ant o He noted the 17.:.- -year history of development, by Pac- TrUst in. the Tigard area with over 1,400,000 ` square feet of ,office space tYe advised the project would continue to reflect their eommitutent to high -qua city dev.l. pment.' o Advised this would mean a large nur0 er of jobs i> , the Ti area. I Page 10 - MZ�I COUr7cIL t1TEg MAC 22, 1989 Sr 4. 41 Jlssirtarit Planneir,'Jerry Offer {rev►; recommendation for approval. _ 'S PRIORINTRT,f, o . Phil Hedrick. , applicant's ' representative, 1 l r`5 5th $venue . Ss is 3850, Portland, ORS explained visibility prob eras and `it •not markeotable for commercial professional wee. They feel that r, xlti °family is a alternative uses, that.. is marketable because:" of the site location to transportation and shopping:. The lot ` �urs�anty' z oned d®veloped a monconf armin g use and tie increase ii to Siwae . high ;`density would bring ` it into ` conformance.' Z POAZ7[ C o Dan oatt , •� _ r � a"i rson stated that th nao. d Lsc�esed this e; et at great 'lengths', and were at . a a nd as to e* They dial not have a :quCge,ma at their mei ing so they did not votes on this request. David Hughes, Rt. 3 Boer 2781, Sherwood Or, stated he has oii*sd the vacant because of the visib LL ity problem he ` is not able to', compete• with 'tHhi Otvhei er esite for 10 years az d has tried, have the sites dveloped. areas) in towns, zoned C.P. 7kb has 116 4'. found t reesidOntia] developer who is g wili�n to work with him . R►,1 their ':staf r ar! , ',ate Mary Brazil, 11463 SE Hall Blvd. , Tigard, OR 97223, was concerneeel abontM traffic con st i on. the f l t Hall Blvd. needed to be widened before ariy development takes plea:It. Richard Murray, ; 11440 61, , Lbmitatil, HoR 97323, Stated,that the ex a. sting vacant sot is in su th 'a mesa that hs is tempted to support tom► d request., nt would Cree te, i suchlike noise Witlr the he wouldn t have• ati `ht if the .site is developed commercial ' professional. He was also cohaern d because (existing apartments in the area currently have drug problems and the police are aonatantly having to' respond to calla. v Phil Herrick, reiterated the Ingineer's report which stated L that e', ie, apertftnt would Create less of a traffic impadt. He 'stated. that thiura would be a 30 foot ®etback from the re aiid9 ' . Theirs Will ,not. � 6 moot with g n a area ' a for eecreeenin any windows fencing and plantings Co:iitructed on the want aide of the development. PUBLIC werriND S! H. Me Brazil, 8834 SW Bohman Parkway, Tigard, OR 97.233, asked if he could testify, he had n si. ot, ed up to I speak. Chairman Moen' agreed ' .and added his name to the sign ` up sheet. PLAIUI CONICIStIONI 2, 1°SV/ PAGE 5 ix I..., U) >,. k _ t , _cii.A, 0 w Mark Vander Yacht, 9125 sW Lr: 'cust, Tigard, . OR 97223, lives in the County. His basic concern is created by Washington Square. He felt ee t�af f is ingt Trammell Crow's' project would have a limited impact..' 97223, tax lot 702, supported Berri, Helm, 9255 SW t�faplelea�, Tigard, o .y R, 9 the request. Brian Halverson, 10190 SW 93rd, Tigard, OR 97223, tax lot 701, hens the only home which faces the Trammell Crow project. Yf.,the mix story parking structure were approved he is close enough to , count the bricks. He supported the proposed request with the ground level :Parking structure. ?ohn S. Bloegren, 9960 SW Oak, Tigard, OR 97223, opposed the proposal. He felt traffic concerns should be taken care of prior to develoPeent. REBUTTAL c they substantial traffic in the renewal; however, improvements w David Blake stated the recognise that there is sub,tant area. and support® urban rein i . �P will not happen if dawelopment is prohibited. o Discussion followed with staff regarding approval of the comprehensive Plan Amendment . �e iron g a deed restriction on t he residential P ePe nses and improvements to SW 93rd Avenue. PUBLIC HEAR/MG CLOSED o Consensus of the commission was to support. Trammell Crow's proposal, they support of the neighborhood. The especially since the have the be r��x f ®= than Commission also felt a should sho residential pr°opertiea limiting deelo nt to a parking structure air, limiting restriction proposed. They recogn &te that traffic problems need to 'he addressed. !commissioner Pyre moved and commissioner Berber seconded to forward a recommendation fo t approval to City Council; further recommending g that City Council impoza, a deed restriction limiting the devrAloPment on the residential droperty to a two single try park ng stru cture ( to s story at grade legal ) Mption carried unanimously by Commissioners present. RECESS 9 :15 PM B ECONVENE' 9 :5 PM µ5.3` C+Ciivs , ® e: T . 1 rµ M M ' I i .• ul '1 M. Nhx' rogues t for a Coenpr hen Five P1 n map amendment from Pr, <fesl/ anal Commercial to Medium High Density RRsid, change 1C -P 25 units /a0re for Y i (Professional commercial) to R -25 (Residential, e® '�� � rare ? 5 acres. Also, a Compr P m.. ' eheeneeivee Plan ma amendment from Medium- i'ierlrlia'ty Density Residential and a cone change fr era ,R- 12 to Medium-High 12 (Residential j f to R -25 for 3. t�2 newres. she sub, ect 12 units /acre t parcels abut each other. PI!mING cOMMiss1ON ' HZiIUI'68 " -+ mlir 2, 1989 Perri 4 a .9 LEGIBILITY STR41 o H. M Brazil, disagreed with rt. H. feat the whole area should be left as os:% zone and be developed as commercial professional APPLICANT • d RNSUTTAL o Phil. Hedrick stated that they had no "problems' with the rest of the area developing as commercial professional. However, Hr. Hughes would like to develcp his property now as multi- family residential. SIC NNAIIING BBD o Consensus of Commission was for deLial. They were concerned that this would create a spot zone making it difficult for abutting C-P properties p Q feel a R-'25 zone 'should abut an R -4.5 zone. to develop and thr� dic � not fe commissioner !yre moved and Commissioner,- Peterson seconded to o forward a recommendation of denial to city Cour►il based on the following reeasone u I. This is creating a spot zone. 2. The change would crate e problems for adjacent property owners. 3. H -25 zoning should not be adjacent to R -4.5 zoning. 4. Lot 3300 is currently developed oloeee to the R -12 designation.. k,otion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.4 SIGN Cops R7C1!PTIOh scm 89 -10 BISSITT MPG #2. ; A r0g0cst for a Sign Code HxceptiOn to tUow retention of an oversized (140.5 ignore foot per face) and an ourheight' (30.5 foot high) freeestandine, sign. The Code standards for freestanding signil in the C -G zone alloy 70 sq. ft. per sign face and a mtviimum height of 20 feet. : C..a (General Commercial) LDC?TIOO: 11989 SW Pacific Highway (WC211 181 3SDD, tax lot 5102). Assistant Planner Stuart reviewed the proposal and made staff's reoomwendstion for denial- of the variance and approval of a sign code exception for a ilight of 25 feet and sign size Of 87.5 eq. ft. per side. APPLI(' t T' g PRSSNNTATIOW' o Larry B ssett, 2204 NW Irving, Portland, OR 97209, explained that there is Visibility to their building ae they were required to foot r o ha�ne3 a 30 se g in 1969. ek from Pacfio Highway when the building was constructed w ed to tong f then g . a oAt. and seen a Gin to s ,. , , sorb f Setback r igements were. c�* d`e�' g y the Hank bill-14116g and the Theater. He Current! the sign is ob netaton w " felt that etaf;.. s recoearae it att b ould make the eblugn unusable. Hark Cushing, Goodyear Representative, 11989 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard r:�ess and Pc, 97223, stated that �he� s, + y.. i s crucial for their buni .: decreasing the height and size would not be viable. 4 PLANNING COP USSICK MINUTES .. w MAY 2, 1989 P7GH 6 �xtciso2ed 'Is the packet material for `a scctiodulod for May 22, 1989: �on xay 2, 1989, the Plannin';T, Commission ri�riew i' �; proposal to am end the rehensive Plan i►riap front ' l'rofeuional, rci it to : Kedio 8 Residential and to mend the 4otain4, fi cm C- '(ProLeasiod+i.l ,vi, cl: sj � tol R«�25 (Reeiden :ial, `25 unitsiiere) fay: 1.75 , acres located at 11505 '...,,, .1.....: , ,J', • Hall Blvd. ,The, property is currently developed with 2 single famil;�i ;bas'dehcea°. Also requestaed is a Plan Nap amendaaent frOM Medium- Deneity° .ReOideftial to Medingo High Der city Residential 'and a zone change 'free( 8412 ('Res ants).!;. 12'. units acre) to R -25 for 3.'02' acres.. l c ted at i.).1‘556'; A1'W b'th Ave;n e. This second, ,parcel ,Ler. contently developed with„ a 49 unit apartment, complex. 'The two properties involved in this . a pL.cation. abut. each other. The Tlanning CoI!i nielion 'recommends denial' of the iroposal . Attached is a vicinity map; the Planning bivision staff "reps►' ; the May 2, 1989 Planning Commission. *minutes regarding the proposal =: arid the ' applicant pacoposal (relates only to 1150511515 SW `Sall Blvd. D'► ss=ss=a=— =as*seaes=— sftss==sseos=am=ss M TERNAT. VES CONSIDERED • Approve as recommended by st,af `2 . • Deny as recommended by the Planning Coim mission. ;y. ==----0===========s--=-'=-=-=-=============================6=== ...._„ . = = areas- = >`.= ===l ..�_,_. ,..._ ;saaaaia ;s=se:iaaza'saiimimarCastas S UGGESTED ACTS; Approve the proposed Plan /zoning man amendments. Adopt the staf findings supporting the approval atd clireot staff to prepare a final o MOW LEGIBILITY STRIP . • : • , S.W. '.INC: L 09 th A •.< • •- • • •- • 41: •_ 4-0 • s- •; -till. • • • •' • •_ • •. �•: • • y • • •_ • ► • • • • • s. !' g. • 0 - -• S' w.° ..® t to • FDA IT STAFF REPORT May 2, 1989 „ 7 :30 P.M. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION TIGAIt_t) CITY HALL TO' HALL 13125'5W STALL BLVD. TIGARh . 0`REGO4 97223 A. FACTS �seD��al Information rm ation � Comprehensive'` Plat Amendment CPA '89-04 Zone ,i"hange ZC 8 . Ma � amendment from Plan �� ' T; A request for a Cnmr.:�ed:ens�.ve p Residential , REQUEST: rtial to Medium-High 'Density Professional `romme�u:. ° C-P (Professional Commercial) (Hughes' 25 units /acre) f © ' ` � ee w �!' from C and a zone change ro R-2-5 (It.ee� ��. teal; . Plan Map .amend_ memt from for 1.75 acre. ive 1 propezty�r and •a � Co�r�►re,nena � ` � � ' y, Medium, Density Resiekential" to Medica-Hig Densit • , "�� ' Residential and a zone change i:rom R -1 , (Residential, 12 for 3. 02' a�.�~ea � (Posco , Isnds' units /acre) to R-25 f property) . The parcels ah:it , each other. APPLICANT: Bowen Development Co. O ;ER,S :Dr. David Hughes Woodrow Hughes 111 Spa, 5th Ave�;�;ue Woodrow SW Hall Blvd. Portland, OR 9;204 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland Oil Svc. Ca .' Posco Lands, Xnc. 610 S w Broadway, �y. add e , Sutte 400 Puttland, OR. 9/204 �# ���15- °115I'� SW Wall Blvd. (WCTM 151 35DA, tax i►UC�.TImN: Hughes F��oper•ty �- .ca�+a lot 1400) are P' co propetty - 11555 SW 88..r'ti Avenue (WCTh 151 35 ^r , ` tax lot 3300) . Background ?�.if ormat .9a 1 a One �raes for � o� � ..�cat.•�on 1� ' rise oth arcele ate within the original ,u,y ij, ncasp �o r B . P r cmra show only . of Tigard. Planning Divisiout to oun a . the City a lication involving either of the Teat +gels since that t devAIn 19 8 aPP �. .. " �cce" r� of . areat �rarcel imvolved in Iiif.no ' tsme. In 1988, tax lot 1400 was the p Land Partition A.P 88-01 which resuite in the creation ofj �.a __. s(,the Of. the itindercare Larnirl " Ce re 0.74 acre► ' (site O rater) anti �.. 7 a� ptesen° t tx lot 1406)4. 3. Vicinity '�nf orm!►t�on Fro "" e'rtles do the north and east "tit the x,601) pcn P�,!,� pda cure ceoa 4 P C-�;�, and contain a niadic.al bf'f.�ce b�n:tl Ong a GHES CAA 8 S�;i1�F R•EPOI�T BH; bt GSM on parcels f rooting '00. Hall. Boulevard, nonconforming single' family. reside, aces and vacant parcel, a which also have,, 'frontage Boulevard, and three undeveloped parcels which, ,ire ,landlocked. m In addition, a mobile hoer park,,, is located east of taa lis' 3300 nn% property zoned R-1.2. The. Tigard d Pla a sh piling :enter is located to' the southeast , of , the sub ect parcels.. This property i zoned General Commercial). The "laca ,Garde ns ,; apartment complex` .s. , l.oc Tted to the west of tax lot 3300. 'his parcel :iii` zoned R-�12• Pro r� ctie: tia' the northwest and west of .the Subject 'properties contain s1.gle ' faily residences and duplexes' and are' zoned R -4.5 .(ReSi.dential,:: 4.5 units/acre). 4. Site Information and !railsa D es c ri P t io Paz lot 1400 contains two single family residences which are" ;set, 'back approximately 400 feet fVom gall Boulevard. A , 32. foot by '290. ° foot sccessway, which contains a 30 foot' wide paved. driveway serving both Kindercare and the houses, connects tax lot 1400 with Hal* ►culevar� ,s Tax lot 3300 contains the 49 unit Park;, Place Garden Apartments, on'' 3.02 The parcel 'is therefore developed at a density, in excess o is of 16 ytcres. p ° units per acre. Access to the apartments :from,: Center Street a ail approximately 45 foot wide by 500 'foot long, access drive which is located between the Tigard . Plaza and Center- ' ►ourt shopping centers,' parking lots. This ` private road is known as SY' 88th Avenue. The applicants request that. the Comprehensive' Plan; map designation, for tax lot 1400 be amended from Prof e> gional Commercial slat to Mediumt-11140 Density Residential ak d the zoning, from C -P to It-25 (Reaidentia,L, 25 units /acre) and also that the Plan map designation for 'tax lot 3300 be amended from Medium Density Residential to Medium -High Density Residential and, the zoning from R -12 to 1 -25... The redeslfgnation$ are requested in order to allow apartment developm=t on 'tax aOt .1400 and to allow possible future redevelopment of tax lot 3300 at at least: its, e� tax 00 present density,' Presently zoned, ' t4� ap�.,rtmeAts . on . lot a, on de 'nonconforming, g use because: the Parcel is developed at are considered a greater density than the zone permits. 5. 4y a& NPQ. Comments The Engineering Division has r viewed the proposal and offers l the following cou'ineuts 1. Under the current z'roing for tax lot 1400, the potential ea ,atss for developmeut of all office 'building o* apProz; matei7 ll f, 000 square feet. The i roposel1 zoning ' 'redesignation to R -25 wi.)uld allow development of appro Li'aately 44 apartment " units on tax lot 1400,. The potentiaA traffic impacts of full development 't ';,ider the pr posed R -25 zoning eaesignation are less than the Potential impacts of full ` development under the current C-"P Zonin01. Ito anal Ysis was provided regarding the potential impacts of the proposed.:_ redeaignatipn of tax lot 3500. . I 2. Sanitary and Store sewer's' are available tai serve futon I development on these properties: Park Plate Garden apartments are P resentig served by sanitary and Astor ' serel. The adequacy of these facilities ' to servo future development 14111-, , be assessed during i t ie revil uw of any futn e ' developmeni Yiropooal STAFF tFT'tdRT HUGHES'- CPA "89 -04/ZC 89 -04 pA GE 4.2 • a r Pi The uregons revieweo ,the : pror' objections to elk! proposed • redesignati'ms. The however noted, that access 'impacts upon: Hall .Boul�rard �.�addr' =eased through the review or any future: devel )paient . 4 ,ot The Metzger Watet District; 'Washington County Fire , District 1 stand of f eired1' no Lva�y Ds�i on,' will need9 be proposal ivi en: ,tax 1, City of Tigard , nilding Divi.nion reviewed the ; proposal' and comments or ob I4ections. No ether comments were recei.vea. and the' offered no INDII9GS . AND CONCLUSIONS • in this case are Statewide g the relevant criteria , Plannin Goals and 10; Tigard Comprehensive 'tan ''policies 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7 • 8. 1,, 8,1.1, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, and Chapter 12, Locational Criteria; and the change or mistake quasi- judicial map amendment criteria of both the. Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code. The Planning staff' concludes that the proposal is consistent with the 1$ ap licable Statewide Piercing` Goals and Guidelines based upon the following f ivdinge Q has adopted a Citizen Involvement 1. Goal #1 is met because the City program including review p applications by ro lnding eview of all develo meat ap Neighborhood Planning Organizations (NPO).' In addition, all . public notice requirements have been , satisfied for this application because the City has applied all: applicable Goal �2 is met he y Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Community Development Code requirements to ,the review of the proposal, 3. Goal 410 its aatisfed because the proposal will provide for additional housing oPportunitiea as pkometed by ` the City, s Comprehensive Plan and the Metropolitan dousing Rttle' (Oregon Administrative Euless, Chapter 66.0, Division 1) . Approval of the proposal would Increase housing opportunities on the City s developable residentiLal lands to 10.18 dwelling units per acre ,as 10.16 units per` acre. A roval wet11d . compared to the currEa+4 PP also provide incroased opportunities for multi- Tamil ► development. Only o eatie ties ' 3300 aFls Y 'P 1 housing nppor�iani 1400 are included ,.n t this calevtlati.on since �r�ax lot tilread f developed and therefore is < net included in thy! Cit7's buildable land a Tho A:etr6po1itan Housing Rule rrMquires that the City ma { +y Lain a min :ahiam housing heneit*HoPPortOnitY rate for developable a minimum 50 /S. is lands of 10 uiits� pet: acre and 50/50 oppo;�.�.?anity m for single family and muilt°=fi fit a , bv6using. the Pa anning g staff has determined' that: the p aposal is dolk;eistent with applicable portions of the Co mprobtensit'e Pien based. uPpli to f ndingsa noted below: STAFF' p.EPOR7 HUGHES' 'A ►E!: • Plan Policy'' 2.a1.;.1 is satisf ed bt ause` Neigl boyhood rlaani Oarganizatio.t #2 end surrounding' property 'owners were given noti of ;'the .heating and an opportunity to com®ent on tine proposal. The ., purposes of;�lan' Policy ,S. A.3 ,, a�►i1�.1: ? be furthe'ed icy the' proposed redesi4nation because all i►auee; increased,:resident al opportunities within close pr y �� o�daity to- �� the: :�� central business , dy.etrid�, which' 3,s a iroarimately 'one' , qua�•ter, mile, south may make. the 7.central business district'' mover ei onomically ;viable because residents of t'ae„ propert ee mould , `be! anticipated to r h, utilize nearby commercial. and civic opportunities' within ,,,the ' central business district. In adds lion, redesigan ; i'on of'. commercial property outside but • close to, . the central business distr ct may teduce the iakli,hood: ithat a,new commercial enterprise would bypsen ' commercial ' development opportunities within the ' central business' district G 1 h. Plan Polic 6 . �1.1 is ; s tiaf ied because the.., `u'�o .e y � po al p - �roulc� rovde .� fob additional multi °faemil de el.op ant and could ,.' o�,portunity V" increase the no; c o sing opportunity ou buildable lands yin ,:the City,. This is deta .l.etd in the ';a >iscussion ror goal ,10 above.. the City o t Tigard is 'obligated,. through the Metropolitan: Housing sole to povide ;for ' n equal housing opportunity mi . of single r 'farm ly and multi — family units `with, at overall development density oaf k10 Finite rev acre 'he Citg w iv t ensure: that sufficient. higher ctensity''areas are availab1. �lS► the intent '' f the Housing Rule can he met. The' proposed rede0:4nation would further the City° a coy pliande with these r'equiremet te. . Plan "olicies 6.3.2 and 6.3.3' will be satisfied b' ' ecause thc� proposal keuld allow for redevelopment of the properties in ways, that may be more compatible' with., e4 j Beet established yes" d nt al areas than the evicting uses. or:.currently,'permitted uses of the, C-PP Zone. Fu ure' development tine parcels w..i be ,:subject tJ density lmitations within 100 of lower density. , residential zones and also will tie subje;�t to; setback, buffering, and landscaping; requirements, that imay; lessen' impacts on adjacent_ properties to a greater extent than nuld occur under: ;Cade 9 PP re virement a h {cable to development nro'poezals under ctrrent Plan and one designations. • Plan Policy 6.6.1 will be satisfied through the ' Imposition e buffering and screening requirements of the Community' Devel0 13e Code to any/ future development proposal tor` the properties, • Plan Policies 7.1.2, .7.2.1, 7.4.4, and 7.6;.1 are satisfied because adequate public service capacities are available tot serve poteatT ate. development on the properties; ` Storm sewer and sanitary sewer extensions will be nece4ssarp' to serve future 1 ";" development on tax lot 1400. 's cats. he , accomplished a's" condition or developing the . site. Plan Policy 7.801 is Satisfied became. the Tigard se 001 D stri,c was informed opt` this proposal. Thy . School `.District is pted nt constructing an aeidition to the Durham Elementary Scht 1 and ` :a ST.APP REPO tT HUCt3E5 — CPiA 89704/2C 89,-04 PA � + 4 rc 7 p r is , lil Y t 1 Y Dun aAr tevie .n trtf 1a p ' s to '''school: attendance 11'`) ro Deed t chango, � a aisle �.' is 5 l ( iY dies► h��Y, eiisting`� � 1 Ti el e ' `aci vs "a�cQ Ei tended to alleviate overe o g k ry° s�r've< < fut�Z"�,Y h , city tQ 7 DSOs and tb provia�i additionss;l caps iX '4 .. tai, ,d i�h •,M j> + i I t i i 1 c`, 1 t 1' G i% - r growth in the area. a PI �� � x ! '_ NM y PI ssiafpl{ Palfrey ommits the . � G'Lty to plea r for y e -, F plan ., 1 f1 i f ° hat meet>t� ei rreot nueds�, efficient . street ,and ` roadway system } t T r ent. y 8 ,u icy would , i e t satief .ed a><ticlpated f∎xture' develop#► 40C would reduce because , the 'proposed :red esignst .on �of ' tai lot. l he anticipated tray f ic, onto Hall ' Boulevas�:a� ��a noted y t antieip Divission and because any additional " traffic Oginearl,a�8 30 ' wduld f�com ' redevelopment of tags; lot might result ` � p ' They �ngine'eria� 'directly , impact , t; arteri l for collector ,, street. , ' "Dfvissio>Y will •review . any , :future development .propooa]s� or either re wire; improvementss� to afiec��d phlie of the pxopartf.ee' and mad '9> u. , , .., , .opments�. ,streets' to reduce; impacts resulting from ;poke �;. .l6 will be satisfied as a conditi011'''', bf approval 'cf n t<< L. ana y develsc► ® r ent ®� the propeerties, E Nec,eBSa, st ee any f ut+ure p be r required a� �' ' Ghe d Improvements to Hall' Boulevard �ma8. The C t o s �r ngineer3 g Di ission and develop tent of t o .lar►t 1li4Caf. y the Oregon State Highwy, Division 3l� reie w , n y t v Inr development p ro oeala for' either ;oft no properties. • Plan Policy, 5.2.2 it sat ,ss, €iL0 acat�se r Tri -'Met Offend bus yserviea' leb+ thaan� one quarter mile from' the onacitic �Hfwa, , which teat lot' 1,400 �`a properties, and on gall' -Ho i1evard, bn,, , frontage. " 'herefore the proposed red1eaignatian Would ate at lntc nsive typ +D of development within close proximity to existing publec,translt routes. 11 • lie ttiCationai Criteria speeif .0 in C� spte A of the flan fhra Medfuu H gh 'Dext sity Residential use' are `: ®itisfid for t f ctlla :,q.ng reasons o m i t�.ed to Za�r . dens3l m c 0 a. The subject properties are 'snot ' rdwelopment. 'Density ; tra nSItion, f Qng.a and. Screeni fi equirelents of the Cosmmunity Develop ant; Code will asat s in making future dvelopents on the proper . - , , offi g te with neighboring duplexea and . single ' :,1 ,,!mLly resOences `a,E3. well as with other apart rent deVelopmeltts`. � 1.400 has di rect a�ccesS t0 all Bot,di�evard, an Tax lot. � : whioh arterial, and indirect access to Pacific HighwAy s, • as a�,n arterf al. nd . ,to . � .. cla :�sif �� - Tax It it': .. , also His functionally , - � both Paa'Attrs H ghway' a 33 ©O �'_was� ;, i�nd�.rect access.. to� i ad a� ma. or col.ltector �'sticet. Y`' �� Ro �� Creenbo�t�.g � Serious development limitations : getting 1 he pr ►pert ° nt and ub ic facilities es are either present are not elide p t can be extended, to set" C' future ' ,de ►eic pfleitts ox>l properties. TAFF R,FPORT - HUGHES — CPA 19'04/zc 89' a ti H Public transit available on both `;,Hall " - boulevard an ; o Pacific Highway within easy walking 'stsnee ` of r' properties. e. Convenience retail service is available nearby k ilong Pacific Highway. 'Commercial and ,business' • center; sire. located within clo se proximity to both properties. h� .Park Place Garden Aparti��,ents, are preeentty, provided , with • a swimming ,V001 ,and', ',' other common open ,spaces ' Common open space and recreational facilities that c'stomarily, are provided with mult':==family, developments w.11.lbe required of future multi -fami y development on. tax lot 1400-. No :public • open space is lociited within the immediate .vicinity of these parcels. In order to approve a quasi - `judicial amendment to the Plan and zoning maps, the City must also find that there is evidence of a change In the neighborhood or comuiunity Iwhith affects the subject parcel. Alternatively, the City Wtst ,find that there has been a mistake or inconsistency made in the original designation of the parcel. (Comprehensive Plan, Volume 2, Policy 1.1.1, Implementation Strategy 2; Community Development Code Section 18.22.040(:)). For the - ubject parcels, a ombination of assertions! of both ' a mistake and a change of circumf3tancen affecting the parcells may maY1 be made'. A mistake May have been made in not recognizing existing' development density'of the made ztn the ea�ist Park 1 lac . Garden Apartments at the time the 'parcel was designated witxi the Medium Density Residential Plan der i.gnation and the R -12 zone. ,As sucr, the apartments are a nonconforming use in the R-12 zone and would be limited in opportunity to redevelop at their ` present density. The property's owners therefore desire that 'the Plan and zoning gtm • consistent, stent with ' r Per re s ea�ist ng densit�� and to amended to be consi. density P PP � development P P o therefore improve their o ortu t , of the parcel. Tax lot 1400's current designations of Commercial Professional sad C -P are not characterized as a mistake, but instead are likely based on one one r, and because of changes in circumstances cumstanceswthe choice ot~ takennmay have provided the g best development opportunity for development of the property« Staff finds that it is possible to make findings for the property satisfy ng all applicable Plan policies and locatioinal criteria for either the Commercial Professional or MediurrHigh Density Residential Plan. designations. The Commercial Professional' designation is the designation that has previously been assigned by the City.; The property's owners have had a difficult time attracting developers Of uses allowed in the C-P zone to the property largely ely e of iu lack of visibility from ma ur roadway e. The owners, ho w ever belieVe that the property has adequate access to attract ' multi "Pamiiy development to the site and lack of Visibi lity -win not, detract from its at tractivenes s for residential use. the owner s also i, to the a, the demand for develc►pable . . t� lieve that 3:n addition h bov�.. a tt3 -fam ow �� -family � w. _ g .. than the. , demand' for , � 1y resdenti�r Land and how consti�tutes� a chaff a �� of '. Professional Commercial la d ,...g cir: cumstances. o _ 'm r • 'T SAP CI �- HUGHES cPA 89- o4/2C' 89 -b4 -.� ! PAGE ' PREP 4, RECOMMENDATION The Planning staf'ii recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation for approval of CPA 89 -04 /ZC 8)--04 for the Hughes and Posco properties to Medium -High Density Residential and R- 25(PD). APPROVED BY: Keith Liden Senior Planner br/9648D` STATE REPORT HUGHEd -- CPA 8g� -'j, /ZC S;',►- 04 -- PEKE 7 Tx en '0 0 r.J • Mark Vander Yacht, 9125 SW ' Locust, Tigard, •R 97223, liven in the His basic concern is . t,-a.ffic created by, Washington, Square.. rammell Crow's project would have a limited Lpact. •�, felt Helm, 9255 'SW Mapleleaf, Tigard, " Ok, 97223, tax lot. 3 , supported the eat. th a lot ? hne , t 1 �97 97223, � d OR , ar, Brian Ha � ►ereon �► 10180 SW 93rd, , : Tig , only . home . ich faces the Trammell Crow Project. If six story parking cstrUCture %slot e approv"I*d he 'is close enough to . c nt the bricks. He eui,,orted -the' • : opra®ed request with t Parking structure. he ground lev - pe John S. Blom s ren 960 a1W Oak Tigard, OR 9 23, opposed tic proposal* Ile flalt traffic cons a should he taken car of prior to develbPs ant. IttEDUTTAL r., David Blake stated they rec °;;rea and supportts urban renew development is prohibited. • ize th there is substantial traf im inn ithe $ h er, improvemeute will rot hap sn if' Discussion followed with st f r • • Sig approval of the Comprehensive a Plan Amendment requiring a . •'eed rest • ction on the residential properties and improvements to SW 93, d Avenue. PUBLIC BEARING CLOSED Consensus of th - Commission was to support ramrsel:4, CrooE • s proposal, especially sin. they have the support of 13 neighborhood. The C ommission s�o felt a deed restriction shoul be required i the r esidential properties limiting development to a Arkiig etructuz® as propr sed. heY recognize that traffic Problems need to "� add re®s ed. Corai _ = ioner Pyre moved and Commissioner Barber seconde • to forward a,' • ding that arec • : , 1 - ndation for approval to City Council; furthr�r Dec • � � -n C y Council ncil impose a deed restriction limiting the develo • tint on the esident ial property to a two single story parking structure (to story at grade level). Motion carried unanimously by Co��s eioners Present. REC2SS 9:15 PM RECONVENE` 9:25 PM 5.3 CmMPREBENSIvE request for Commercial t Professional: PLAN AMENDMENT CPlI 69-04 MUGnas/ ', !Janos NPO • 2 a Comprehensive Plan nap amendment from Professional, Medium High bensLtkt Residential and a one change from C=,•i? commercial) to R, -e:5 (Residential, 25 .dent�.al,� �5� units /acrp) for 1.75 acres. Also, a Comprehensive Plan map amendment from i•i dim- Deneiy h Denreit � Residential and a zone change from R- 12 81 (Residential, al d12 nts/acre) yto R -25 for 3.02 acres. The subject c , Parcels abnt each other: PLANNING COMMISSION' ISSION' MINUTES MAX 29 1909 PAGE 4 d tot • -M I Assi stmt Planner Jer. ► Offer . review+ad the etgi re recommendation, for approval:`. PY ICs,WT's PRESBNTRTI ata 5 4 •'etaf Pith he�driak, applicant' a representative, '' 111's $W :.w 5th ' lwgnue, • •,Quito 3850, Portlaand, OR, explained that the lot ' prea ent� y sons d ; �P . ha "s visibility! pawbl aims and is not Mar*etab)* for coemercial ,profs esional 'use. They feel that multi. family s a alternative use that ism marketable because Of `;thi0 emits • s '� { location 8$1d •hring:: � . The 'lot xo fed R -1 s cuaa°eatiy eveilopsd with a noncoYnfora if g- use and the ' inoroaaee to a ium • high d unity would' bring it into canforMina .. C liEsT o flan Gott. 14PO' # 1 Chairpea ���on, stated that they had . discussed ed. thi t request at great lengths and *ler�a� at a quandary as what to Flo. They dlid not have ut, quorum at their mea ztinl so they did not, vote.. on this g uest., o 'a;;avid Hughes, Rt. 3 Box 2785, Sheerwced Orr, stated he has owTasd the vacant site for 10 years and has tried to have the mitt, deimleped. oMra:aer, ' because of ` the visibility , problem he is not ate to compete with the other areas °1.0 town zoned C-P. Be has now found, residential dew4oper who is Willing to work with him. Mary Brazil, 1111-63 SW Wall Blvd. , Tis acrd, Olt-11)1223i San con�zarned traffic congestion. She felt' Mall Blvd. ,needed to be widened .sefore an development takes place. Murray, 1440 SW Lomita, T,tgarda OR 97223, mutated 'ethat Tat, existin vacant lot is in euc ,, , Q h a mesa that he 3.a �. ��aptecl to s�sj�;�port' .►� acequeet . However, he is cencerned • with 'the problems that Yaich a dev01.0pobAt would create, sw h as noise, which he wc. aldn t have' at night 'It the Otte' iS oped commercial p r fs ®s3ona1. �a�t �te, c � C o n k ®rn e i beau a ia�' tments h. =t t e area currentl y have drug pro%lems amd the Pellicle are constantly ha►viey to respond to calls. APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL o Phil Hedrick, reiterated the Bngineer•s report which stated that the apartment would create lees of a 'traffic iMpact., He stated that, ..here r; With 6 foot cedar There will . not be . residential area w�. the res q any w# n�.owa3 g plantings _ ��,�yin fencing be and �© lan i.n setback t for e�crQ constructed on the west ai of the develoc?ment PUBLIC TSTI1! ANY H. M« Bra i1, 8834 SW Bohman Paricwray, Tigard, OR 97223, af1ed if he could teatifyr, l?, +e had rot signed up to speak I C►laixman Moen agreed. ''and added his name to the sign up sheet. PLANNING C"?3MISSXON MINUS .:u, Rai 2, 1989 = PAS 5 �_ • • • • H. M. Brazil, disagreed with the traffic report. Re . felt the whore ,area .eUcould be . left as one zone nd be dege oiled as commercial, prof*ssiona1. APPLICANT'S ItBB ° ^; o Phil° Hedrick stated that, they had no . p*'cblemu with . the rest of the area developing as comarcial professional. I However, Mr. linghs1 would like to develop hie property now as multi- family residential. PUBLIC BEMIIRG o aonSensus of Ccumission was for denial. They were concerned' that this would create a spot sone making it difficult '' for ';abutting iG-P properties to deivelop and they, did not ;feel a 'R .25 Bone should( abut an R -4.5 zone.. *, commissioner PYre moved and Cana ;!.eeioner Peterson seconded to fomwar4 recommendation of denial to t :ity Council based on ,the following seasons. 1 This is creating a spot zone. 2. The change would create problems for adjacent iixoPert y owners. s R-25 Boning should r40t be' adjacent to R -4.5 zoning. 4. Lot 3300 is currently developed close to the R--12 designation. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. R* 5.4 ION CODE F XcEpT oN SCE 89-10 BISSETT NP0 ' t2 A request for a Si • (148.5 din . sign. foot - r oot high) freestan g • (30.5 ova, sired' 148 5 squ g face and an owes )aei ht 30.5 f �' " Code e Exception to all��w retent ono high) stand : for freestanding signs in the C-G rZ0n3 ,allow 70 es . ft. per sign lac - and a maximum height of 20 feet. BONE: (General' Commercial) . TION 1198: SW Pac &fic Highway (WCT'M 15' . 5D!), tax lot 5102)- Assistant Planner tuart reviewed the propo -. and made staff's 1 of . approval of a sign code. recommendation for de t�Mh�, variance an pgroval exception . for a height of 5 feet and :'sign, s e of 87.5 sq. ft. per side. APPLICANTS PRBSSNTATIOta . Larry Biesett, 2204 NW Irving, P no visib3, 7 1't,,', to them: build setback from Pacific Hight-i Setback requirements we Currently the sign i felt that staff's dr as th :. . when the b changed to ten foe obBCUred by the Bank bu commendation would make the CB 97209r explained that 'there is wercs required to have a 30 foot ding was constructed in 1969.` and then again to zero Beet. ding and the Theater.' He s ` ,.n unusable.' Mark y n 9 Goodyear � ep t� e �� i� l i eg �9� z ard, ON, 97223 s tated that the sign is e•uci 3 farhnoe ar and decreas g the height and Size would not be viable. Eh rwG CO* ISSI0N Mii uT12 S MAY 2, 1989 PAGE .. , tiY1�A i •1 �.'. Y We , hereby authorize your f 3 rm B roceed. with the 'City of Tigard; amehdment application for; Tax Lot the e Hall Street Apartments` in Tigard Sincerely WoodroW W Hughes SHE CITY SHAD IMPROVE 1 ND ENHANC CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRIC DISTRICT COMMERCIAL, HIGH DENSITY '',;6'P S1DENTI ,. BUSINESS, �;C AND PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY GATING A DIVERSIP IED ECONOMICALLY VIABLE ' CORE ARE entral,Ace to the Central Busihes Dis r c "CBD") locate ! .'on Man Stxeot in Tigard, Oregon. A: 5u h, t k deve' merit serves to enrich the diversity of the CBD while providing an opportunity for its residents to take advantage of available services a Residents of the development will : .nok toward the CDD to satisfy their consulter wants and needs, thereby' strengthening the economic viability of the area. Correspondingly, it follows that the CBD should strengthen itself for increased demana consumers for g oods and services. In sun tho proposed development should assi at the C D by providing additional consumers s f or the area rv+ y . sT OW E t,a�era er family, and conunercial-professiqnai use, the proed 'clevelopy!ent will upgrade the area w4.t:17.-new" constrU(3dOn- that will enhance thl surrourtding naglIborhcm.d. The 1,egi..ona,1 Director ,,for'Itindercare has been contacted as well as ,adjacent prope,rty owners', concerning the proposed development. They have taken a neutral p6sition regarding the E:' .'propos'a "� a e velopment adhere ► to,. V !`` �tJ�u .:sr established k'�y h � `a ,the south of the property there is roper ty ' known as Park Place 0 This prop OCEI zone. he Prop used .develo pmef� mpat1b1 with t " property. e prdpe single" family houses abut the'° prope y onie ere �level 6p�'iE19 '� a �h$. area can be c s- q ��hee .s a de'. is designated far housing phr a p sus ns. u ants of both prop :roes a e f a ,'i .y units '�YPa�. ooh differential,: occupants i�"s" "�o�e� the east act`oss flail; Boulevard ' The property � � i b+ t'he're is an apartment community ]uaow as hest car this parcel. • The proposed de'+f elop ,ten t i ul : oompti this multi - -family property, erty, though at is separated by a 'maix arterial. Trial i ail Boulevard) . The property Jta a t O `is oura<e tlg 'zone � C t.he is ' P as p' ... is posed development: buffering The required off' the proposed develop Trent between : R -2 5 and C-P assures a distinct, separation of parcel us 11, 0440i: THE CIY SHA AING )�01WEEN DIFFEEENT TYPES CAF D USES (FORa, E XANPLE.tESWEEN. SINGLE 'FAMILY i RESIDENTIAIe AND 'AWIL''l RESIDENTIAL, AND RESIDENTIAL" AND. COMMERCIAL , U AL', ST tIAL J USES) AND THE FOLL i �I G RESIDENTIAL ��D , SHALL F $E. CONSID� IN. DETERMINING 'TIES 'TY E AND RE FAO ®its uIRED E,�EI�: ENT OF THE' ,i2EQ E PURPOSE ®F , E BUFF , FOR EXAMPLE E. TO ' DECREASE NOISE LEVELS ASSORB AIR POLLUTION, FILTE 2 DUS' OR • To PROVIDE ASU THE SIZE OF THE IBuFFER NEEDED , IN : TE S•$ OF WIDPH AND ,HEIGHT TC ACHIEVE THE PUR • THE prEig TI 01 (S.) FROM RICH THE IBUFFIE ISI NEED t • T E QU I1 r .1 DENSITY OF THE ,B1,3PVERINa. WHETHER THE VIE""EiI is STATIONARY, 'HOuILE 1 7` b . ON SITE SCREENING of SUCH THINGS AS' SERVICE AREAS 1 ND FACILITIES® ,STORAGE AREAS'' AND pAR1T,40 LOTS, AND THE ING FACTO:t SW L� BE CONSIDER) D IN DETERMI�N'ING FO�LO�T , THE TYPE AND EXTENT OF THE SC tEENING e 1 • WHAT' NEEDS TO RECT yT IS Pi ;�DEI . � , - HE � T ®N D 3. II ®V+T DENSE THE SCREEN': NEEDS',, DE• 4. WHET ER THE VIEWER IS STATIONARY CR E LE • �. WHETHER TIE SCREENING NEEDS �� � develc� `� �en1M f��� A privacy fence will separate the proposed, p south ash. adOnt land owners • Additi y the north, Wiest, and � � , to ,� �u�h r�i p ` e sired 11 be, �d, the r� ��nes ��o �.ha� Irv' ands planted . '; TZie wept .,.th grass with a variety of shrubs interspread• boundary of the pro p ert y r abutting the . f anvil t--4 a zoe, will be privacy fenced r by a green be l:t with sha ubs . Additionally, raw of garages ,� �; ec1' bah' 'the r�esb' t�s.11 be eva p boundary for noise abatement purposes. evelopment will l'be,,eholoSed to { The refuse Sites Within the ovde for a visual barrier. Finally, the, , thil.drens' play area p '' s y. A r�rcen belt areuncl the play will be fenced �o, promote safet CITE SHALL RE QUIRE .. � -�� I DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THAT: DEVELOPMENT COINCIDE WITH THE AvA;EL4DILITY, ®F, ADEQi0iT SERVICE cAPACITV INCLUDING:, ▪ PUBLIC W 'TER 2. PLR hIC' SEWER (NEBEVIOPMJ. T N SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE CITY!) AND . STORM DRAINAGE! THE FACILITES ARE t 1. CAPABLE CF ADEQUATELY SERVING AL , INTERVENING PROPERTIES AND THE PROPOSED DEV)I LOP NT; AND y • H)ESIGWL �,. D. 'TCD CITY STANDARDS . ALL NEW DEVE]L PMENT UTILITIES To BE PLACED" UNDERGROUND o The development will be d0sigh /Adl to conform with the availability of adequate service capacity. The Metzger water' District has -=oAf Trued that water availability, is adequate for the proposed project; the wa'trfr district has a 12" waterline that passes in front of this pro P ert y The public sewer system should be adequate for a multi- fami?�.'y' cor .plex TAtith 40 units projected and the target market being small families. The storm drainage system aril have the same lot ooverac,;e, so there should be no substantial changes necessary. A reliable and adequate water supply. storage, and delivery systems are presently available or planned by the city to Provide' sufficient quantities of high quality 'water to meet existing an needs of the community. Therefore, the addition of a future n multi- family apartment building should not adversely eff rc` w i Place g in tervE?lCfi�l.n'� ca a�►il.�t p �wr „' tees of facilities aes aax P p ro erties and the proposed project. 'To our ka°' owidge, they hate Oigne tan irre tly�, ate C� � lard .s`.' se ire riCt and Washington ;Count Oes' at would slow the rel!tpo OSe ' time %the ' devel6pinent ill conform water system serving 1.t will have adequate . water , pressure, for l ordetrom and Meier and Frank A . pr 1vate roadway lea s o °the �I roper -off of all .Boulevard and the proper � °` idle from h property to, pacific, Highway. The present roadway s em appeaa adequate Yeb0 i : ize aci ' are l..yy ro c yy ° � eo tin F r INDIVIDUYAI# DEVELOPE tS PARTICIPATE ? I HE IMPROVEMENT Ol EXISTING STREETS B U a AND SIDEWALKS r � + EXTENT 0] THE DEVELOPMENT • S IM 4CTS STREET 0 S D S BEET SIGNS OR SIGNAL, BE PROVIDED WHEN THE DEVELOPMENT IS FUND TO CREATE 0] INTENSIFY A TRAFFIC HAZARD; request use of Easement X35- ;9,, a 32 f7� private, roadway ` leading off of Hal ;HOule'rrard to the proper y. The developer will conform to city standards reg rding streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of . the developrnen and if the development' should create 'a traffic hazard. 1 S ON AND ti .2.2 ITS` S iI: BNCC� EXPAN G TkI ° TRANSIT t f I I CATtNG LANINTENSIVE USES „�'IN S ;' 'P OXIMI! I , RANSITWTAYS;.: ti 1 blEl on Hall Boulevard xrectly to the east, of ...$ ne ��qq 4ry� Ty�1 to Highway 99, 1.5 Mocks t�`t%e �y on Sta � �" running, from Barbur ' Blvd. as well s Beaverton '. and r,Iz appear, to provide Yee, most services. is enable' Gast access; a as We'll. as' out1y .n+ ; suburban' �:. �cic�aaa�oc .' i��r���ind �.�x, e. area employment, shopping and other s� rvices areas for The proposed project would improve the iiZrabiii' y e 1" light o jrvcreas .ng p0pu1at3.pla a Ve1opmen' s' avail le ,':o as well as .a a Hail Boule zir� shopping center .s locate ess A than ,a ter mile from the thereitore h3 n t o 'kin distance The shopping entt r 'ice �. ia� d" ' a Safeway grocery r store retail sho s provide , "hdditional speiaalty J . A • J h ■ TIE .CITY . S; ACCORDANCE 'W, E APPLXCABLE P %! J PROVIDE SING ` DENSITXEs O ICIES APPLICABLE LOCATIONAL cRITERI A�� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT coDE PROVISIONS. APPLICABLE The city has provided for a variety of housing densities . throughout the 'Tigard city ; iitaits. Tire proposed Bevel opmen would he/p to balance the, m\talti- family density with single faun residences The following factors will be the de : niiit is of the areas by adding a high 4dehsity designation.:` designated for high density on the plan map. Areas which ar' r not committed to low density developmeflt 2) Areas which can be buffered from loTa density, residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established 'low density residential areas.. Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. Areas which are not subject to development limitations. (5) Areas . where the existing • facilities have the capacity for additional development.` Areas within one quarter mile of public transit- Areas ° within one quarter mile fray neighborhood and genAiral commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. g Areas ad ' acent to n either private or public fi) A, permanent open space. • e'�� develo - invent has not been t area for the Proposed off d P The subs ec � P (3) (4) (6) (7) • e� loop the. �� menu order �a .�aaci�ar�� committed to law density d In ore buffer between the low density zone t,o the ' west cif the vavelo ment r a series of barriers 'will be used. A privacy fence P followed by a green belt planted with shrubs and a 'row of garages are planned. This sequential plain provides for a 'visual barrier .. buffer first ollowed b a sound barrier. bu y proposed i fl t tii I r, .I,,ti'ay �/i t 1 r (iJir 1� tlfv +i r' •;' i r ' lu r co ex th oul lbe ief it the` �� h n ber ` of dine D�.stri�� by ix�cr�as�:�?�; � �� !� ,,. � onswaae gar Central Sous:. �� ` . .., ` add to ,die SOciw°= �cOflOtQ c scab �w►ousd ro ds a hy3��her ' r ual;ity r o mu l l vin t moderate; to higher` , rental level f,iccint' , clue to the Ret zonin , c the ft e would tr'ansport`ation a ployment;. hopping, ax services 'ere S.* adc ition the" ^� rabil�.tXl, and ,.1 • orh®od would a greatly enhance o'f- the speciic � 94� al>ity of � construction and landscap armed. oWNia :M , an Holmes' Morrison $tree� Port Land,' Oregon 97205 Park ,Plae Garden Co trt,. Portland Oil, "Service Compan 610 S.W. Broadway Suite `'`401 Portland - Oregon 97205: Offer Planner Hall Boulevarl 97223 $street Apartment Rezo,li n Dear Mr Atf�er . We represent ands nc .' Portland Oil ServiciA Company, a Pasco` Poscio Lands is the . owner of the Park' Place Gard_ en ' Apartment a 49 -unit apartment complex situated on 3.;02 acres. The street address for the apartment complex is 1155S S.W. 88th, Tigard, Oregon. The principal: end 'representatives cf the corporation have advised me that they desire to participate in the application proc Ass which has been filed by Dr. Huahes, et al. in their effort to rezone their grope ty from C -P to R -25. My clients ''desire that the Park Place Apartm Onts be inclus °d in that rezoning, specifically, to cI?,a,nge the zoning from R -12 to R -25. This charge + i., r des' nation faith respect `P p Y 4 g would bring the lane use res ect a r�► er ,�r ,use ,. of the pr�apoi ..y. involved mire. c�.o�e.� to the actual Attaczed .; of the properhty advise. a ^opy of a decd evidencing ►' cl `+ eiit's ownership If you ' need any Other proof of ownership, please Seattle, Washington 98171 + Schwan, Williarnsopiy lg1F,itt & LeniL U'S Bank Building, SIiitr 900 �► 1 15 Fifth iAv t1 ► :, i► „ 2015) 621.9.16 Washst� tc n '20006 . Schwa W'a�ameua�t & V'V�att 2000 Pieitn �iivah�aiAvenue N.W., Suite S33S b 7F 960 p . �" ��` �� a April' 12, 1989 Diane Stites, Assistant ;Vice President eon Financial Services Corp. 3850 U.S. Bancorp Tower 111' S.W. . Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97204 subject: Hall Street Apartments Rezoning . Dear ' Diane: This letter is ter follow up on our conversation last' tire* ..regard i,nq; the proposed 11,an Amendment /Zone Change for the Park Plcwe Garden AA►iesartainnte . an Dr Hughes `, property.. I have diocussed ;'your let teX and the statue of this application with Keith !Aden. We wish to restate seeral items regarding the application so that we are certain that everyone is clear . on these items: i to Dr, i': ,ghe ' ' property only. , Ww i. The applicatios>'a s coras3plet�� in regard have received nothing regarding the addition of the Park Place Garden Apartments' to the proposal. ' In order to add this property, we will need a letter from the' owners or their, representatives agreeing to participate in the application; a copy of the deed or tax ` statement showing proof q p of of ownership; a list of all property owner® for , properties within 250 feet of the apartment property; and . a statement of the number c.f apartment "Unite need, on the property. »� We ne , this infortma\ion by this Friday April ' 14, 1989, or it will lie necetneBlt''ry' Y for US to further postpone the hearing on this application. w , 2. Planning hearing on the proposal it scheduled` for May 2' The Plannin Commission i�;a at 7:30 p.m. The City Council hearing is tentatively sched'xled fcr t xsy 22 a t 7 :30 p.m. Both hearings will be in the Too: Hail at the, Tigard City Hall. Mr. Brasil's participation in the proposal is not nieces a Y in nrder i0 make your proposal work (as long as Park Place participating); however, hip artici ation would likely strengthen' .. proposal significantly. Please call me if you helve any questions. Sincerely, Je;° ry Ofit ® " A Letan't Planner C:: Dr. David Hughes br/Bowen1jo 4 pA BC 2339`7, gart ► egon 97223 (503) x639 -4'17 • • s • - n• r• ••• ■•• MOTtAtIDU24 CITY OF !riGARDe. OREGO • ' dy"Wooley, City Tinginser &tog N. Berry, Utilities Engineer It auzcT CPA 89-04 ' t)oseecerig__tims 9 The applicant ,propofses to change ' the zonl.n4 of a 2. 75 acre parcelj, ram Professional Commercial tD Residential" 25 unite/acid+. Bail 3137d., a state highway', is, the accesii to a , public right- at , • Although there in a unitary ak'IWer availabifi in S.. Ball niov°, it 'Isay'' not be able to serve the enti!..ie- parcel since the southwest corner of tsar '- parcel in albeut 12' lowor than the ground at the manhole. The applicant has submitted a sketch , showing a *storm drain, in the ' southeast corner of the parcel. The adequacy of the) ratorei "drain to serve the entire sits is unknoWn. Under existing zoning, the Maximum development of thee site is approximately 111,000 square feet of office Under the proposed zoning, the maximum development is apprOximatelY 44 t‘part.ment units. The potential traffic impacts of deveiOpment,under the proposed zoning are substantiallyl.eas than Under existing zoning ReCommendations: ' The mngineering Division has no abjection to the7roroZed i,Pne 'change- , 14PPROED: Randall R. Wooley, ty Enatneer • 1-n A. owe March 29, 19 Mr. Keith ,Liden Chief Planner City of Tigard 13125'S.F. Hall Tigard Oregon 97223 R1E : HALL STREET APARTMENTS REZONING Dear Keith: This letter is to fol-low up a „d t the Status of the rezoning application' that wre submitt d e proposed Hall Street Apartments I ,would 1 ike to confirm somoi Pointe : the impression that ;our office feels 2 . We orablyn t©wa�rds the rezoning:' of the above mentioned' oned favorably, g if the owner of Park Place Gardens A artments ',property.. p to t:'�e south willo agree to rezoning. We area waiting fox' =an answer irom the owner's attorney and have pa user? along the: requirement that they must meet • sere attached letter) Is there a time fratoe for r ormation ?'” suh:�ittin al azo g inf this aad ton n n 2 ▪ We continue to be under the impression that 'fir. Brazil, an acsl, jecent, property owner, has no desire to rearane his property, or to work with us . Would this have any effect on rezoning of our parcel if he does not rezone his property? 3 • It a telephone conversation with Jerry, Offer l4s.t Thursday, March 23, he stated that the review of the application 1401/14 ',be moved! back to May. Woulc you let us know the exact date that this will ta��.e place . 4. I faxed .the list °of property owners within 260 feet of y office. I o ou+ the property lass t Thursc�a to your t i understanding that we would not, be equireca to contact any additional property owners surrovtnding'Park Place. Gardens . Let;, us kno ,w$11-', be i� .�.cessar�y�'. w i f this wil Thank you for your help. Sincerely, BOWEN PINANCIA , SERVICES CORP.' Diane N. Stites Assistant Vice Presiders cc: Mr. David Hughes, l !9 iowen Deve1opgnent Company a Bowen Fttiancial: Services Corp. N Bowen Property Management. Co.. r Bowen Securities Company 3850 U.S, :Band rp Tower • t 11 S.W Fifth Avenue » Portland, OR 97204 • (503) 274-8 r. rrr�y , f er • Op r • J owe; 4arch .22 1989 M r. Terry Hauc is Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt 1211 S. W. Fifth Avenue Portlnd,Oregon 503 ); 796-290° Dear Terry: • t nit° to visit with You this morning I appreciated the oppox to �' Our firm. rep�eaents regaY ding a rezone for Park Place Gardens . the landowner to the no th. of Park Piave, • and as 1 indicated is interested in developing a'small 40 unit project on the site. Frankly, thc. City of Tigard has little interest in rezoning' this small 1�.75`.acre parcel as it would appear .to be a, spot zone change. If we are unable to secure the support of your clients, g We have submitted the the rezone will most likely fail. necessary documents and started the process with the City, The zone change is from C -P (Coraterci.al- Professional) to R-25 (medium density multi-residential). A copy of ' the rezone application that we submitted is available if you would like to review it. The Tanned project will benefit your clients by upgrading the general area. And, while the new project is somewhat more upscale than Park Place, there may be increased renter traffic in the area that could benefit your clients. It is possible to have Park Place rezoned right along with our project site without developing a new application. Here is .what we will need: 1. A letter from yrtia as the owner's representative that sates you wish the property from R- 2 to 'R_ t 1.sri 'to reRcne t 3 R- 25. • Copy of deed, tax statement or proof of!, ownership . 2 3'. The number of ape tment taliti6 in the project and parcel size of property. is a time constraint City will take a decision in call : me as the you have questions, and I'll be There d early April. - Please determtyte. Y the next step. in contact with You as we Thank you for your.. assistance erer sinter el y BOWEN FIIANGIAL SERVICES ` CORP. C:., .t.L 1C Philip erlrick vice Prey ;.dent i1 IBo ten De+Veloptnent Company :Bowen Financial 5ety� es Corp. Bowen Property Management Co ■ Bowen Securities "97214. 503) ,274 -8400' ` $lU'YS Bancorp `Touee wt tea Fifth A�en►�e • Part�and, O�. r. r . 0 • -• , 1 . u • r CP:S 89-04 ,HUOHHH A request for 'cuePrehenSime, plan map ,110ersdiEmi_ Professional ,Commsroial to 'HO/ma High Density a '' *9114? ,ehanga $tbsa -04. (Pcotaaa4),14a]. ..Commartgkal.), to lit-25 ,(RePidential: '25 units/acr4 or 1.75 acres. ' Lockeioris 11bo$,..13s3.5 SW itiaix Xl*do AVZ7114 161' 311;01.% tsx let 1400) , . , - Attached is the Site Plan and 'ar/Plicant.,s statement for yoUr ,ravi(41W. .iProm information , supplied by variou departments and agencies and frois;,Other- information available to atm staff, a **Port and Olcoarimandation will ba prepared and :a dooi.sion will be rendered, on the proposal in the near future. If inzt' wish t.. OeismOIT4 on this application, we Deed: your comments by "larch 25 19. ' You may' use the space provided below or attach a 04maratos 3.ett.r to , return your comments. „11,,,u,p,raglig.--' ,thitAb9,72.1iitits..please phone, the staff contact noted below with your cements and confirm, your comments in wri.ting as soon as possible. IL you have any questions regarding this matt, •contact the Tigard Planning Department', 'PO Box , 23397, 13125 SW., . Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. /?IlOrtilt, 639-4171. 'STAFF' CONTACT: Jery Of fq PLEA =CH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal an hAve no objection:: tett, it. Please contact of our office,1,1 Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: n_ .` • DATE: March 17 .:r ^�iosarrCa�r FROM: Ti+gnrd Planning De sent J '�� I' , RE � aP3l, 89 44 " HUGHES ��►' rsqumr� #,.� a i�'eh ®naive Yan map Profeesistiaa. CVamerc , um Hi h D�►nsit ' Rei dentia a Eon e ts+a� ,O P al to Meth � X `� s ®na w �rcr! � (Residential, . �� - (Professional Dcmaaer►..i 1 to R -Y5 aRao � , � 3 , unite %acre) for 1.75 aeees. .CATION 11505- 11315 ,SW °SaI1, "E.lvd.' (W TH J 5DD, tax lot ;1100 181 3 Attach 3s the. Site '� Plan- and applicant's statement ` for your review. informatS,on supplied. various 'department's P1� • 'by and agencies , at* from other in Format io ' available to : our 'staff, a report And recandation " will :be prepared zad 'a decision will . be rendered on the proposal in ',the near future., ' fut ` u2re.. . If you wish n nid PP licati on , we to � b 19n. You arty use tae 'apses provided Belot a or attach a 'separate h return your ce ments. 2B_a g rsapntAkq d please ghoone the staff contact noted balm/ with your comments and confirm your cants LA writing as soon as ,possible. If you have any guostions 'regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PD Hor 23397, 13125 Hall Blvd.! Tigard, O 97223." PHONE: 639; -4171. STA"F CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASH CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: a We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please reker to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Comment ing s Phone Number _ lake+ %CPA89 -04. BKM I,, • or 1 • Hi A 9 iJ J DOM SEC MON: Tigard Plaarani ng Po star eflt RB: cP .89 -44 ° MGM e A ;request :'for * comps hR 4I:0 It Plan m amendment from Professional Commercial to Medium High Density Rsaidiap ntial and a zone iftinhang.its/aare) frosa ;C P (Professionai °Commerci:ai) to R-Y25 :(Re��id nti al, 25 ' for 2e75 acres. LOCATION: 11505- 11515 SW Rail °°81rd. (WCTB' 151 350D, tax :lot 1400) Attached is tapplicant's a�. Site Flan and re,." " tMlen} for your r�i . w. Fran sd various ',departments :and other information aooP� t� by �mp� agencies and. :fraoa information viaLLable to our stet% a report and ' rocommsmflat on will be pr pert d a 1 decision will ,be rends r d on the proposal in the near, future.' If ;you, wish to caanent OA this applic..t i.on, .ears ,red y+o L" consents by ;.21., 19M. You may use the space pro. idad . lbowl ` or *tta6 a separate letter to :return your co w er:to. j f,,, }e,att,snabls to respond .bv . t} ;asaho�re dates please p r with your ac eats and ,confirm your hogs this' staff contact notes. 3a®low gommennca in writing am soon as possible. If you hare any questions °regards °Ag' thin n w tern contact the Tigard Planning `Department, PO i Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF. CONTACT: Je g ttg PLEASB CHEOX TEE FOLLOWING, THAT APPLItt _ no objections to it. We have reviewed the proposal. and have j Pietaae contact of our office. Please refer tc. the enclosed letter. yy Written Comments: ate; zssedf s • ra a • 4.. Name of Person Co nrferi 'hone :Number: 9i bk /CPA89 -04. Biros, n w Tigard P�.�! r e DATE: 4 _.y' 8 A seguest c,� to ccmprehen ive plan asap ai n ant fre s Prof(a nal i rc: al to aum High Density lte®idential and a zone' RR: OP ^hwsge from t .P (Profe.eAonal "CcIm rcLel) to '.84.25 (Residential ,25' rafts /.acre:) for 1.75 'acres. LOG.ATICNs 11505 -11515 Sci4 ;'all .B1vd. (W 1S1 3S DO, tau slot 1400) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review* From I.afo oration .eupp;lied by Various 'departments : agencies and frets, ether inoculation available to our staff, a re. o rt and recommendation /ill be prepared and a will be tendered on the revopoigel in the near future. if you 19 � • i�' to,cmment ohis applicat need ion, is by h 2.,. Yuu may use t h e .pa � ovidad attach maparate letter to - return your camaiente. R1_ i ^•.. A "1' / '.' ! ,At t, P xeaee phone the staff contact doted below with 'your ; ,comments and confirm your co cant s in writing as soon ao possible. Hai you have any questions regarding this wetter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO ,',oar 23397, 13125 SW FJa11 Filvd. , Tigard, OR 97223. PHONS: 639- 4171. STW CONTACT: Jerri! O €. Q f er PLFASI CHECK K c FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviews ! the proposal and h,!�:a:. nc objections to ft. Please contact, of office. our • .. Please refer cLo the enclosed otter. Written Comments: uy.11101111■1l■••■••.+r..w+.:.rr1411' ...... !!'.: 4:J./ 1tt9.n.r.+r�Ilr..�M�r\vl�lir.f` Na ilt of Person Cora heating= bk u /OPAa9 -04 . 1310.1 H NOR COM P Dit: Tigard ,planning Departaaent R CFA .89-04 i ES A rr!guest fee a comprehensive pAan ma au.n Pzaferat,•ie�ual , *, t tre�ne, P erctal �to i ediuw Bi r* Density . Residential endd a zone change sxcm F .(Prof. ssio gal Commercial) to ,R -25 (Re dential 25. waits /acre) for 1.75 acres. *r C TION$ 11505 -11515 :16F1'.110„1, "( CTli 181 3 SDP e /014 oD Attached Plan and applicant's . statement for yair review �4r ;aa. 'information supplied by Various departments and agenctis • aad frOie able, to' 'our stuff, a report' and at' infoz�atioal avrail po Lon ail. , bu ' prepared and as decision will be rendered on the proposal Lin tie near fu'�ture. If ;:y'ou wish to: ��� goinsent On this appl3.cation;,' ,we `n by 19 You may use the apace provided below Or attach a *operate .letter to return your 4�cmmentw.. �t v�u are unable tc � the atbeavPe please phone 'tho staff contact L oted' below with your eom -nts and �4firm� your cooaants in writing as coon .as possible. If you have any epsestiono rev:: -ding this that' er, contact the Tigard Planning Departatieni , PC BOX' 23397, 13125 : EW Sall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PTiONg: 039 - 41714 . q '.... i STS coNTACT: PLPUSIt a u:CK TNN FoLL011ING ITEMS *FAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have ;,i o objections to it. please contact of but ofic* Please refer to the' enclosed letter. C Written Coamments: .: DATED i1SE AND RESCUI -- rs, sM*16'b- Co�x�lY Fine Oisirict Na t ,oily of lieewerton Fire "Derarkni t "NOM FM1� DM�rict 1�•IRE MAi IAL S O 't�ICE ► r ed . *Who* Ceo Geese 81x 1@ fR Maher Fiaerrtrac • GrtrIth t?tlrr* Pa;. tiooc 17!€�.i @ � 9arno,i f ,et f lI Name of Person Commenting: i' not a Ntumber: _3 „ bk /CPA89 - ©4'. AKKM yM CHAIRPERS PLANNING CO MM ISSION/DATE OF HEARING: 1EARINGS OFFICER /DATE OF HEARING: • .j CITY COUNCIL ' 1TE' OF HEARING:.' EQUEST FOR COMMENTS (S[E 'ATTACHEU NOTIFICATION LIST) DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE PACK,: 11 CONTACT PERSON (9,t ff) ... A T C * ENTS TO SE 1ISTRIS ' p ;r VICINITY MAP NARRATIVE SITE PLAN (REPARF FOR PLANNER APPROVAL UESST FOR COMMENTS: LANDSCAPI! ',a PLAN AM 'N G'ECT'JAL PLAN L ER F ACCEPTANCE ` APPLICATION (pate accepted EkTISEMENT FOR: - y,ORN GONIAN .r hearing) (Q*te) (Date),,. (pate.. 2r�:. ti . to �, UBa�Ic HEARING NOTICE T li��RCl1i N[ L�NC PROPERTY OWNERS .J Ototeabemailed: TICE TO OLCO , w th w at attachments: I Bowen ' Fin ancial Ser-vices +Cor'' Su`.te '3850 111 SW Pacific Higk;way Poitaand',OR 97204 Attt ri : D lane Re: Water Service SW Hall Blvd Pe'r our conversation January: 9, 98,9' regarding water availability for a 40. unit Hall Street "Apartments;, �} adjacent to Kindercare. at SW ;Hal /81 4'21/, the Wate r District has a 12" taaterl rie thjat passes in front c f this property:, This-Should' be. adequate for service to this property. t'�,� �n e call °1. Should ,you require .further in 'forma ._ o 1eas our office. �' Dsse 'a . Lowman istrict Manager SCALE I 3Q 25" JUNE 1985 4l d =. o ;17:047,-6e, ' r N/ j j i ri sew a 57.1 TO SE AS r, CLOSE TO of +( rinr,oci )cr r 9(eV) it)eers ac;fic HWY. =41 Tard E loss • = ' 1TRT SEWER' 'EASEME■NT '1 JI\ a HUGHES, D.M.D , •., , ,• , oott•mar‘itar,y seWer easomsa,nik a 'pet'it', of theI",• of Lot 261 Block 00110 hiiT,ZGER CRE TRACitt'; a duly reOorical!icl' pie,t,_ rjeid eitanalent being in the F!t...,,uthe.eet. 1/4 of goat_i n ' Tc3t•insiti'it3' '1,-'2411Littl, Flange West, W,111.emette Meridian, City df 'Weetl'irigtori County.' Oreolon, more •partieularly r:leacribed 'tio' • • .• , , " • ' • . oCoiritnenCiiig et the t■lorthoiest corner of' Lot 271 13Ie:ick ea3.d • MET'ZBER AE, TRACTS; thence North 1' degree 01'00" Emit along 'tne Wiett line of timid Lot • 26 e distance of 62.63 feet to . the Nerthweost Otaf'rleft of that oelettein te.aot of land c;izneyeel to 1•I' Riollord W. Sutter in Fee N. 630142S00, Whinjtor County Dd Roszordo; thet-toe North 039 dagreeis 1111001“ East eiorly the North line of eeid 6Litter tract 2S� feet to the point of heginn.trog of tile oenter•lino of the ig1.00 foot likehitesiry sewer eissetTient herein to be deEloribecl, geld eacientervt 1,;firld S'ecJil 'feet on each aides of the detriterlina Witt,h 1he eidelineor of maid isesemeht lengthtsrlit)g or= deoreeesing en a to begirt. on the Nort.-ti line of e.id ' Butter tr.lic.b; I thohoe 14Oti 44 dagr(Peti e4'��t Wirt?,t, '34.79 feet to a point on the Weskit line of said Lot 26 which lion North 1 Cegree 01f,130" Credit et.00 r3ot, from the 4oi4tiliweit corner Of said 6Litter ti•I■act field oolfl't; beirl the, ter-m4 nws of the ■Ilaseattient ofentittr-,,I,L,ine: With the El 1e of amid •aleterTIOnt laiongthein.ind ror', decreriale4) Eft) els °de) terinll,natfr I on eei.d Lt 26 West Ithr. 44/ „,0,10,.°,42,.::','.004‘,,0;440,=',0711;1:..A.10,0,:„,0r40,0,4.;•,„,“,0.14,;„,01i,,L,,,t,,g4,,,,,,,,,,„,:,4,40.,=.c,,,:0*%,,,,,01,,•)::.L.);.4,,,,,,,..,...,'A.,1;::,1,:4'",it',:*: -Iv • • 0 Th til a change S mill tar !Fate •' 161f1ts sf!aiti sent to the follo+■f,+►n _ddresss }' Agsinnnear C.. wy hiilRCltAttGR:C iK?R '1�114Q:J1Ar,E ft1NSI1�E � • ' after flfl Area to ,a's ,. RA► 'Iry7. r NNgf Sete transfer to Assign�ot, does ' bR e,` assign* set over • he' if' w. °convey. fllit ase3 e referred to; as Ass39heea al'1 otO �nrtcNa W.'. At►t�RS ,, .: intecea ice, and to that' oPrt4in Contract eat: herettnacter r Asalgno�r•s 'ri ht. recorded in 31 right., t3t,�e aaS ,, tern e,drtaude y . 197R, as Recorders od le-15 2A, Q.e71�. , twee as rtr Pastor.' as Selle�c sere Mo. ?R-. Reatt r',, • vHeid•W .ant!Rugh es,' as hn V. M hes J: Seanh �r• ' ane in �. • ito�r�a V. Hc�gAera and theses,, s�►e l�egnl nd in and to the real Ifeninia ' as ein, exhibit ption o wh Pro y iM>wid and ich' * attach desor by this. reference' lnco ern, together with all of the right, title and rated heron,, in and to the ahove . and agreed described real interest Of der t od interest t ,that Assigner is the Wropertl►• . ft is understood M*eroln . Owner of any �und3tvlafa► boa. Ilinn full',pl3ance with >t covenants of said Contract he terms• con6itttoec and • that property be node t notase .ua� . ' aigi or authorises and Y of said real directs ' llssf to �►astgne�e. ghee hereby assumes said all payments as and ,when due Contcarto a all a1 n the Noa,enhen andl .a reen 4r to;aks; tPeere�:naier she! to to. i • ! of the g ments on the part promptly Peee harwiess for, �. e1��reSAder and to port of hq�ror ieede�unify and holdasignoir hay's fees. `any and all liability thereon, includin gattq� The true and actual sista in whole of other va oatdecatiaan for ..'- tcaosf%r ,. This `ins>rru�ht dc�ers not use may be waste of n the guarguarantee that an Property descrit in this en tieyi+e 1k.. A bU3!er;shaui�; chec�vith" e�he � t' ='arming tnepr,te`tiaent to apProp fade. city ar sonn y' verify aPpsoeed uses.. rant this .2 list., day of 7OstoberLN WZTlIE4C' 1lERFY9R, the , 9 3. � :hare execvted thiu`•Ass S ?AYE or VYRC([we • County, of hultucunah � this the a '"`,°ay of Eletober. 1983 Personall a ena� rsed OP.1,1rc TItf1MAS and acknowledged the fore- 2103,. regoirg instrument to be his !rolu nt,..�., 9 Notary Public or nr • 'i . • .. My f'ommission Expires: nn Chi* : `` :. y of �'�ecohee the aboi►ia -na.. . Peruaha11Y the Cr.. voi instrument to he hi* volun arY act and da acknowledged the � [` r3► et and.. �fec*d, Reform?.' . 5,' ~ Notary sMy Cc +issIon E at,a: Pap o ' 2. 1lssign,,,nt of ,+tract ' by Purchasers ii At • it' - Sal ii16� =t C xri C`, o ias i IC�a7�1 SAE`! ;'p17QZdf� �i� .1.41''.4 Wail do State of Careyorat: t]henoe triest arty aJiao:q this Saul of less txs►iutlirt ar..IGO feet. air ocntee `o; •. ',the ' feet � thine* cl and e � 3: ilo ' ta lire o • vv3 srr.�. 75 toti.. voce or less to tht 'E�'�y���'�of 16�i3irwix� ?lama , 'e ttbxth *if of tot 26. Block "0'. ;tie ZER t .,th.¢• � ity of aid, Stoot at ri0 gal: -aRxi al iti i`oll .'L g r niirg at. the SouttieeSt'cnrn'r.�' of tot 26. 1,Li lock ; 1�i'J t Ju tiwcxs • . in SeetiU% 35. whip 1 SQUth. 1 'snaest 1ti1l�tte M ridian ' ` iahieti r . � O w: y. Q;agon; thence North t ly Sang the '1st line of • saidio►t 26 0r dia 4o of 52.63 feet t o the `tie point of beginning of : the 'heseatbiaaft�nc' des Bald,' tract: t tzr. , s:o¢1t3,: tin% .along the :Ist line of said liot''26. a di.sta,v a of 8.3 feet to 'a pciirtt: , . thence Fast 301.) ' feet ts, ;the • : l of said Lot 6: ire 5th along the East ~liriis a distance of 4 feet to ,'A point: the North 89" 11 ' 2. feet Moirst: or limo, to the true t, of teginnaq: stial. :: 'ri+gnk� +f the in ad `to arty ioaisd &Lghals irtc]uded he a:in. • • : P?., C: Part of the th e Southeast quarter of Sction 5j p 1 Ranee 1 ti est of the Willamette ,tie ridian • West � County, �e�oa, *A d kt d cd as follows: • gin as tfng at i aeicon Pipe 4eiith .is 'North 02. 03' fast 4V9:27 foot fsara the Southwest 'corer of the Suitt Donation land Oa* theism fr s iron pipe and' true point of hejisusine kiortlt W . 00" ** a 209.78 lust to an jron nir.* on. the Ea_°° 3y line of . PE irtiii y; t t; fnui North 88• '6D' best 25:0 :foot to art iven pips; thence !Ortiz 2' SS' Easy,; ; 186.8 feet to an iron pipe.. thence South 886 'Op', Est 25.0 seat. to an Irian pipe on the Easterly line of the aS aiid'rood atOot, thane Oontioutig.toluth 88 00' East 206.88 feet to . an Picot pipe: theme `South 2• 03' hest;' 186.8 feet to the feint of begitnin%. P.Vt33a 0: �, half of the foUo ring'descrih» tract. Deginn(ncy ,at an irt:e pipe '.truth is Borth 2' 03` Sost 686.07 (yet five. ties Sout1 ost Cots cr o ,t a attains ` Aw Stott »a odor Laid Clain U* x fsi i sa� i iron Peii.� ' aid true 1 'i:te of haji9etiig. t�octlt C9' 00' * t _O6.Ni ('alt ut an ixxo cpsfre oct ti>v EiLcrll• late of a vx�ad a mwl •; • _ _ tJt�t�t. i�ttiurrslle: a�ti an lean �a�re tiry� ,lag'- 'a5W -O0'- ii"z' �ti' %rslL aunt 'irca p i oA rte iasterly l'.i;ne of rt+ r id :o.d erica Uwi re a ut.rlt ' Sa�tile o ^�"'" 00• Ea►SC ?01.96 fi...t to ,.ii ••• ricztkiv lh" t of 1ce93. j'a. in th! City of 7Q�ctis 1. Ii1S1�Iar���s.•� ye ie1:.1'! thU'�Ra'. THIS CONTRACT, as a b�{ NIDA P. REYNOLDS aztd EAPL REYNOLD, herein ,K:allad •L�sl1er not ^ersiantn in ao b ;` 'right' f ludw•i sei and RIC AED J. SUTT , h a S LE AND DESCRIPTION: Seller agrees to sell to Purchaser> and Purchaser a to purchase that certain . L4nd situated Tigard, Costnty ®t ` Washington, State of Oregon, described as foams a 15135D& Tax Lot 1800 .64 acres LAND ONLY PRICE MID TERNS: (I) The total purchase price of the property, ahic Purchaser agree& to pay. Chill be the sues of EiCiiirom TE JS Pa !HUNDRED AND No /100 ($16' 500.00) 1L S payable as i`ollovs (ai The sun of rive Thousand and No /100 (05,000.00); Dollars which is paid • upon ®xecutioa,, her 4.7.14 • (b) , The balance of Thirteen Thousand Pig Hundred and No /`64 (613,500.00) Dollars payaba at not lass than x undred and N ©/196 '($200.00) Dollars per , e inth including princsipal and interest at the rate Of 'tan 110%)' per c s?tt per annum. Purchaser shall pay all ;vial property taws when due `with' proof to '04 `• The monthly instal.lments,,ara4?ayab 1� first day of each sop ;:h hereafter b� With the month of Earch, .1980e tad until the balance is paid in full. the in The Purchaser may not spay mote, thsn 3!i o f total sales price, in any given year towards the contract balance. * Dena. P. Thavisse timid W. aid et it Rsitat 11 RED. rho tom. me; tMr aalloairy Pu bNa In and lYi1����.l..mini. ID`./iYYWYY�Yw�� +�•YrY«rwiilriur YYi {++Yi «wiLiYrrw �rrwii '- iiiYrw• . •.i«.�:wiui��liifi4rl�w.1/. iii: N�114ww�YYip hii4riiY.w.r "�iuY�..L+i:� , ��iY. rwL .ir'iwL�irYwYir:�l:�wiY�iMiiw ;4Y1N- + Y4+i i (4) Purchaser shall be entitled to ,possession.,of, said preiftises One day after the date of execution of this coiitra-t.' and Upon payment of en entire purchase price for tile prtito- arty ,Ss provided herein anAt3erfoemarice by Perahaser.ofall Other ■,,Arma, :4!)ndiiions and Provisions hereof, scllarshallfortht4th, execute and deliver to Purchase a 'good ,ap..ad sufficient deed conveying said property free and leax cf all lieins and 'encumbrinc.Q.s, except as above provided and those placed %moo tha property or suffered Ptirchasetr agrees that a11imprOvesserits, on the presdatles,shill remain A pert of t14, real property and shall „not:'bel'reimOVadlait tine ptiek' .tion of this contract without the written consent of snilipc,,, "Pilirdhaser*shall not cia'aalt or suffer any Oast. of the property or any -`16Prc"v‘ ement3 thereon and nhaill*saaintai' a the property and all itsprovemints thereon in good condition and repair.` , TiTLE.'IHSUitAtiCS's • ; Seller shall furnish at hie. expense PMrehaseria,. title insurance 'ariattet,,Of Eighteen Thousand .PLVSI ;,• Hundred, and ,NO/1100 thirty (30)'4111,!;:'-frota' the date'llereOf'insUring!POchmser,,against, los01,,'et Seller's citle or liens or encumbrances thereon, oxei,t.irg Saatteri, contained • , in usual printed e"eeptiLama ,in such 'title insuraiNte policies, easements, cordi,ns and f record'and.'eleumbraneeti !' herein specified, i,at 'any. • • ,! '',,.•", ,!, „ LIENS AND ZHCHH8RAHcEli Purolloser . egreets,,to keep the 'foregoing, premises free from and promitly tO, iiiseherge anY'and all liens for labor 1,1 and materials created by them 1?urdhaser or asserted by reason of Purchmser'Lusee.COcnOition or possession or ontreet:iutereet in said premises*, but the Purchaser, while mJt in default in respect to any of the other covenants or obligations hereunder shall not be obligated to pay or diseAarge any klert or encumbrance zio long al the Validity of such lien or encumbrance is being con- ' ----tested by the Purchaser in good faith /11tId by appropriate legal pro- ceedings, permission bei#g herein greeted unto the Purchaser to 2, T1 conduct any subh pi-oceedingi, me may be neeessP.Ary for kkii .effeckive contesting of such liens or encumbrances. , Purchaser agrees to save , , the Seller harmless and 'paid tareaki.ses biars.leal any cost, IA:ability or expensr4 resUX,ting from auy arch lien or encumbrance _ for which the Seiler may btiCOINS liable end all necessary and DENN,�TiON:. ,r thee, ovent o gar any substantia .f park of the ►hove described preraisei� b + f �; of ea nent Many public or.;pr''TR H corporation under t'he I nE n, such croon a � the monies received' �n Issid p ceedin�►s th> et shall re $ ats �to aiRy o the above pa iges, ' dire t t o • do ssors fir'; the ��tias of 'wliirte is o 1,:ne Sellee t''r •:Seller's oue:ce be a i .ed �as areilf t .upon, `�1ae unpaid 'pr nci sacli" taking, snail pP balsstce at such tile' exi'ating ur'der thLs contract, and any; excess paid to the purchaser. PROVISIONS T pR UL DEF �1 xforaa an in the event thaf; lsurchaser shall fail to pa of the tetras al this ag reeeeat, time of pay sent and perforraane • being of the essence, Se'1itt shall, at 'his optivi7„ , subject to the require ent of netioe as herein provider have Hhe a�ol ow priatYtrn�'_of alix Y' Yox.., lgil' w 4 To foreclose, thi c contxarlt by tr :pct foice- cloisure in •quit 7 (2)1 To specifiee,lly ernforce, the tee of this co tract by 3ui f; ' ,n equity. and' I eclare ,Ehis coraeet n�al]. and void 'as .jai (3) Tod taintas "the 'daite "of the breac:� �an�l -tu 1.i0i.dated ,aaraages +.Ate awouat of the payeeet theretofore Made u1on said pre plea. ' .et ;der this option, all of the right, tide and interest , i urchaser, shad .revert *nit rev l in Seller without any ' re trY or Without any Other aat t b f Strile.cr .o be Farr fioraed, and Punch to llAacebly our reiR.dcr the prshtie YS Seiler,- or ih defau t thereof pUrchasdt` slay at, this Optio>a .� act, as faw tsiciu. 7?eat''aa tits x/Ont ses dam��1i11Otatr Nike d si*d x. !l :.:.x ■ u ur: . • .» x1xr.+44.• wra......+. x.ut �� ..� ,� ,} ,ylx,xz�.Yxi �..x ... .....x..J.w�xl1..G.1xY+�i.l�.ai xxxif4 ' iux1K .. �, i V.wx r'i :i : xx«1 ..4 4.... � .a /��,y�r y,�;s 4. 1 i t 4 1.44 M 1 44. ar ,e Ix:ii:�. i 44. G : w}u14y i,. 44.14 J + ` WIC ixs +..� x w � at '4114400 r .,:1 hae - he r x ua .d in saaai tRl�j and . : .. Y /N ittili ONO 1%NER OF i1lMiur+rk Kw i ta'I wRt►.NwNMI Jr ,0• of Seiler, bpi tceatsd as At tenant ,holding ,over urla iully,;`after,, the "'expiration lease .'and may bfl ousted and removed ali sits purchaser shall not be deemed in ,default for fOlure to perform '.any : covenant or condition' o ''8 contract nolber. than the ,failure 'to take payments as `provvided for heroin, , until notice of saiey+ bean given by *tiller to ,Purchaser and Purchaser shall gave failed to remedy said dcfault9 rit 'in -sixty `60: '. aye after the giving of the .'notio e. trot cr : `for this pur- pose shall be deemed to have been given . b • mails of a certified letter containing such notice and addrese l to Purchaser at 6309 S. 'N: Raleie hwood Nay, Portla4d, ' vegan 91',!125'1.,' REPRESE ATIONS Purchaser certifies that this contract of, ,purchase is accepted and executed '©n, lte basis of his own examination and personal knowledge of the r re ises= and option at th. value thereof; that no attempt has been uade to of l' ueriie ±his judgment; mat said premises that no no representations . y Seller or by any agent Of Sel r =` h� ,c bl ;erg made by hat been made .,by Seller or by any .agent of Sellers and that guar= ssr . cha tak©s� said property -the -condi-tio in° of this agreement. WAIVER: Failure' by Sant e' any time to require performance y, any y is no . b Purchaser of an of they ��covia��ans hereof shall war affect ,'; of 43' AIg iiit titiX Thu! ion , bek.. nun*# .x4,1 : Kx.:!!!VSAI�E.. +.,.,w...�,,� i�rrM..� air 4: hx�.a..:.- «: + � ..x.xx:: Ia•.aC .•� i•+♦a Y1xixaCY •.ax:Y,x4 ; +9. 4 x « .xL.x ura +.• 'Y:Y :...xa. x.•u ! xu.li..:c x•1µ +Lxx: ♦ +•.• u. w,: IwCx: i{... lx.:• w...: iL .:i:....:..+.w..ii•+«l.ii «r:.« +.wui.1 J i «� .� I « ni�1 +a4cvN.4ltxCC xC- �«.�,« a.•CY i1 cH•..:i +x :x+ a ::�Ix «.iYa xxu C. t:x«xxi x..x �� ♦ �Y i� A a1Yk :♦a A+ r: H i x �•i.ax ka••x:u ,k} k {1.,. +wx' Y i «Y4wil'r: +♦ 11%« x�i {F:S:J�: x. i 1 no AID hD id.ii at Mrki.a1 i a!N< �Aii M nw fie ►; .he :. °' i t1 t oscine / ani1' forci: . 871*.8h#ivell;tiailey'''''.. hereunder ', !7'' .,64 'i'i1■,13.41, `.1.??')f` - clause.' 'lees rights, he_i, : ,13rti1!erel)'':,,** ,ii,1C)s-*14,11'ver Se-, ' Letter ctf:'eny , wailier-,'" • ,'\'' ' .'*. : ', ' '' ''' ' . , ' lye,- le byi.ceed lag ' 11. t: 9r i..• of. this 'it of suf,;‘,;----ZSOR ‘ZOTERES'fSs l''40 covenalltee ce' 114sttiellal and benefit 0; „,m to and 1)a binding Ilk , retie sh111,,,l:ixtrtseaaiiinis;atre, ' ' 411 aeeigni of the gla ragraP the 11`'' ' leg contained n f hereto. Pi'0-',1dede'he*re"r* that shall ititer the restrictions itier.4.145u'adr'--‘7'lva'7.,-- _contained. AirTORPIEtt 'Fs ,, : * " , ',„:' , 1 ; ., • In the event' suit o.,": acfric,n siill be brought by either . ' . 1 , of the parties hereto for the et4toroessent of any of the ooveuelatis or conditions on kite part of isi,t4titsZ a the Etakrtits•% to, bip kept or .. oerfore(14 or idtt, otAle 1 stiit or eteti4:)11 is isseittitfle l'":"Y. the "List k i , t° f °i44 4 1.°11° this ‘.°11tL salx..,;,:tt-i.11:4-atiP4:,C4ntip:schaqltireeum at:thpaey'cWorxrt,meay successful party in such i adjudge tr.easonala le as attoteeysin6cfleuedsi.ngt°abiley 414‘plpe164.aaxdth7eltresfurouccet.ssf71 par'; in such suit or action. em itiv".7. hereunto Elet' the, ir IN WITNESS 1111E11E0F, the parti hands and seals t.lia day and year first hereifaoVe wrattett. ss.: ?ersonallY appeared the above-named NID?, F. and EARL REYNOLDS and acknowledged the foregoing iva�';► be their voluntary act and ;dead■ Subscribed and !sworn to before' , Ls , •' 1990. STATE OF OREGON ) C ounty of !Washington) Personally appeared the above- naacea RICHARD J. SUTTP,RR and acknowledged the foregoing instrument toi be his volunt S 9 a act and deed. Subscr'.e4 and _sworn to before gee,' this 1980 srara of ORBilON, ' _ e �. � . M 444..4.... �� ....:.. BS Xi S E EL, That Shit. 40. ; ni' before ate, (1lNr fined c 1Vo(arX 1' c in k lsx •r" �' ti 4444 ..., i ::.:w.. i:.i;:.. -1 h, the wtatst, aeum-d tilLtan.491!�!e,,..1 lt1it4�, ..�R e�.w Cotmtl and S( r �MPee srd 4444 41 � ,..wJ{ 4i 4..i... .,iii. .4.. «•..n».sw 4 6 „.4444 64 w4« .+.r4 ' 4.4 '..:44 :.i :«i 4:.....4.44. y 4444. ..:...0 .. +. «.:ua 3..»: «a i i «..+. I . uii . v»....:Y..;:.w.""i".' '."..^ i .......L....L..»»»:«r.l...:i.: AnOleill /� .y/� / ♦/4. -" it 4.t 4444 a 44 ail 64444 44:4:4444,461,444.644444,44.446:44:446.4,4•4444.444•444,..414 i l�eeC'�[ IN �:, ae#t«�l�ea�'/�i:�'� th.t. � � � �raraeN► till i ear'... •zea ( (fie i.'uuu h it 40 fink � it 4 r..� ,., ' � . 6 i� rasrrp 3liff �IVHHERP o� r ; . ..• : wb► or ice �' 4444 ee1''agr Jhri4:1 ,liki� 4444 i..474 ...,4... . .'G4µ4 ii rlta. 720 legiuniug "at' a s iren.; pips +d11 `. is N^+rth 2i 03''' l aft, s10s7o'37 ' f 3 , , from the • iouthvest corset ,,of tlts 1110 4ael �1 aloft �iuteioa' Laid , Camp Ho., 33. to Footles 3w Township 1' South, . tlae ge 1 licit, of t Willamette Hergdiaai'" thh a femme pia iron pipe sad ,+few �poLtt '.begiaaiig North 86'' 00• West 200.!4 feet` -'to sic {iron;:' �� ,pil►a CI' the e str r lid of a proposed a9i thence co tit dog Nestle Ati• 00' Neat • 25.0 feet to as, iiren - pipe; ;thence N®rt0 2 ". 3Se Test 1l4.` feat to 'ate ilcoe' piped thence South Art• 000 Last 23.00 hest toc'so iron pipe; os the e74t7:::10"1111:t:''014k, y iPe ori i ' r1 aree = eoatiulaZSeuth 96`; EasI�.l1feet :to os icuia: pip; South' 2. 03' Vest 1!4.; tree paist of hegi a m EICM1HC' Oaercitt n 'tltt portion eoeeweydd, .to tl a State of 'tlr noes► by aid ;tliroube ;its .Sta114 E hway Couetssioet. by deNuest Order filed May 'a, l�r63, ,Care Yo. 23 703, ,Cirrcutit Caeet of lfaahiagteit County Oregon, ALSao ilbl.Inr Ott: }: on 'such ainera lands other terra 'iron or cool:" as resaarwed 1.4 the Gaited 9t4tes is ratcat recorded ' luly, 16, 1801, lei Book 32, fags 1,• ecords of Washington coos ;.. • PARCEL h e ..........rte The North "one -bail otr, the lello eiat described tlactf ' iJ+ Degioetiag at sn iron "pipe which is North 2• m3' teat, 873'.32 feat ii oe •the ratthveae +,.Yorbar of „it - , thoaas;,A, Stott ,Dorattan t.nad,. claim Mo. 33, 4a iacctioa 35,E %owed!? 1 °'South, tic 1:1148t, o2 the Willamette tleridiael,, thane :from trot �+At+c tre;.� p in!t of begi lug, itu rth 86. we !fast 201,'116 ft-At to art laces ripe. the: easterly line of a+; upos•�d rosdvs i theua�a continuing !forth ,4-.411,.. 8 Vast 2Si.Q it�et to- su- -thee Filar--thse ct-clo th-3'A ' 0 I:aeft tooa ' feet ito i-"-" i�oa' Ripe the Sot /i dI' 00'. Lout "Y5.0 ;tact to as iron pipet as the eaat�erly l'�ts of t,�i;e aforeaa:: road area# theca . ceot a�!li South U. 00' ,tart ,210.94 feet ,to in' ir:n pipet thews. `South 1,.` Vest 191.15 feet to the ` point ,o � bei coin&. EXCEPTING l? rear:os ,1:1 st portion conveyed to the State of {;boo goe by and ^ *sough ! its State li thway Coraissi Qn, by Judgeeit Order filed Nay i, 1963, Case no. 23 705, Circuit Court' ii,V . Vaeh4eiptos County, 0resoso far 41.2 I /iiR Ylff Kl�NII�YAir1►�il� M /he • .. •(iR . `...�,,,,������ cry► la c i�a [ kr iii and',SI�atai �G�• ^�Aai7G1T'LI:....:....Y 'L...tu» . i..••.:k:..axs.« j4w. »« .w..` ..:........;1,:,1 wY..»tiui scl...+.w.,LLt - " . .. � � � Y� ..........iYL+z.••••* «..:.r.+. ,w.Lrr:»i.1•.L.1..�i....• -•• •• ..u.u4:...�q'i crax►n En ww 040 Fs Alei idantir i! i -sciiiioeiiielded 1� � ± Y Y4Yb it.... ... 4 :r Wil4i1,4, 146,, ..4.4.4,4 41,.. ∎11, •'�•R:�• •••'. •,Or•• "•j•••• •4•°4•••,•41 •••'•:•• ∎•∎∎∎•ID,M HUSHES-, 11%: HUGHES Qtant sa . ate toiloning described s!! Mat el ensu - s ..MNeJ uefe 44rs44d ti. ....g.Q d a.gae ` • . ... �.,., . eel fords hero 151' 9SDA TIsX 1011? 1000 .64 .crew •• nits DEED IS GIVES? 1N; ruliriumENT or THAT CAM MN s7Cr PEC01ttl5 f3/$0 AS ITS E5 00004529.' • • its Ddtal name to be signed byrarder of board 01 directors. w • • •, r . t . e i0 e corporate grantor: it has caused 30th • 1 • • • •• • Y V •• r : • :.�, • Y •;� •••i••••,1110. IS • • • M :': • • w 4444.•.• • • • Y :/1 • • • w -: STATE OF OREGON. ) STATE . 001. ani tr et \ • d • County et WASHINGTON . AUGUST 30th . to 09) • ( ffltiaftr ao ostod ! .. i . r .. !• ,1� , III N i a s y o lcD was ............... .no. tter�ta cwN wieit , 44 44 ... r 41 f seen 19r hone! aa►d r of ns or ins Outer.; lfid sar'that ins tsNltri Ai 4444 oasweni and anal VW it*: is ans aisiv1aip ot: fn• i • a co station and OM Na•a,M!!iMtWI was *gnat ca behalf of sand cotpotmi on by atnh:oriti of ifS ltd of ;. �- . and sacra of_ meat acsnowteoe,t said i ittrtn nt N be tsa' gimmicks. ad and deed. t.r iar9binp . , ...... :4444 :....nEr tni sirowaaw erg w 44 44. • 44 44 .. r in WPM NAV y��, _,yam 1rr /�.y� .......71.4:...:.‘"...4: 1. •'••�7 w• �r��rr�.r ' • 44 44 • t:...• • (..►..4 e . Ii • .fr... .5 tom» �� . •• 4444• • 7..7 -09 '"' j' h' 1►h► cT+sit -4n artrraa' t *e0wc la r 4444.._ • 4444 WO • Ur CO M pa !/3402 4444 ° -• 'II'iN C rtsrdailror� co` fats Of or ineh dSi dente popnlr de vela. ads ins 1011o.wnd IN acwsi coiisidss5Udn,ieneists Si ar enthaei QNtair poverty 40 .. ue green a frroimsed *toot a part of the &Rota C0,441.laNNon (.ndu CaN w.cnj- +44 44 .: 4444 •••:••••e••ii• 4444 'i4• :•.••:•rrrii •.r•Y•i �• 4444 •:•: .Y•••••••• r4•. i .. e•i, • •i•�•. 4••i s•r•rr••••r•••s• ••.••. .• :•.i.••••.:11...:•..'::•••r•i 1241•: is•••ri•••••••. ri••.. Otamo!li flame and Aarraes i••:••••iu.�.. 4444 1• ii••• i:: 4••: di1•••:s••i•44•s•::•s••:•01 •::: •••:i:i.•••Y•i.•••••i:.i:••ri:e s••se::r•.s••;r:•i•isss Uminss a t s.na and A dd. ANlf tetM i:: iQFP1 :w 10 •1i 4.444.."4444444,44".4-..i. :1. _ !1'••••r••: i4ii, 0,04.* iit� l n J J 0 c",,nang41 is retliiiietN) as + 7 i N 1010,1R0011 NMlf tfa Oa k ed !ha i i,jA 'i iii Y••: i•i ii i I' ii . •4444 414144141•414 •: 4 444:.• J �/ ./L� rr 1+.+ ri 1.11: ■` iiatns, dd .uii ' 2M► %% � iditut 4 f tiee, s.a0b 3339-a 5 86-353976 91.4.5) S.W, PFAFFL J.. ST. 11 CPA i39-Q4 "Hiuq� lei 0 LLIAM 3.65 S SCODRLW : HUCF fit 97223. 341 TIMOTHY 6 YVONNE MCLO'UGHLIN' C /O, ROBERT MCLOUGHLiN 5400 SW 198TM •AVE ALOHA, OR ti" %007 3612 ANDREW &. FLcu ll,NCE HERBERHOLZ 952.0 SW at'..+TH , A' —/, PORTLAI, OR 97223 3613 TOMMY & SUSAN NFBER't 11530 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 9722 3614 (../LEN & i MARTHA HOCKETT 11500 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 3615 LINDA IJOOLEY 11470 SW LOMITA.AvS TIGARD, OR '9 7223 3616 RICHARD & LOWANA MURRAy 11440 5W LOMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223, 3617 CHESTIER & MAE KLOCK P,.O BC's C 23275 IToil ikr> 97123 sw • 1380.. •IGAIW Iles ?? 22 . v,f b91; RP. SONIOE.S� 4N°10'4,." C/0 v *ROME •;;,P, 5400 'SW Dig P0R'1'$N1-3, OR 97225`` 1300e'16.91 GORDON' PIPiCIN SAMUEL. & J :NET ROLE 12215 SW 43RD AVE PORTLAND, OR 97219' 1401 ` 11 KINDER-CARE LI''. I$10 'CENTERS, 2400 PRESIDENTS' DR MONTGOMERY, "AY3mut :36116 1500 MARIE' M THENY MICHAEL BRAZIL '.HENRY BRAZIL' 8824 SW BOMIANN PARKWAY PORTLAND, OR 97223 1600, ,1700 CLARENCE & MARY JEAN BR# PO : X 23064 TiGAND„1 OR 97223 1800 NIDA. & EARL REYNOLDS C/O DAVID HUGHCS PO' BOX 673 SCAPFvSE; OR 97056 1600 FAR WEST' FEDERAL SAVINGS,, C/0 JENSEN, JA TINE BY '�M.L. .KING '202 S.E:. SFJKANE. PORTLAND, OR 97202 1800 R.O. SUTTER DENNIS THOMAS 11565 SW HALL.SUITE B TIGARD, OR 97223 3603 ILIZABETH COSHOW 11425 SW LOPIITA AVE TIGARD, of ,97223, 360', ROLANI;, + & MARIE ,SIMARI 11455 sUt LoMI'TA 'AVE 7'rGAlt ',.'O& 97' 22: ►I,tU, :& MA'HILDA 4016I 1$47 'Sly TA', AVM " OR' 97223. GI1 XA DAIrE ''ET.. AL I IFE. EST 1"1625 SW 'T]GARD. i i0MIT1!1 w 97223 ;P1'� LAce STAN, HOLi' 1410 S'W' MQR2E4S N sT PORTLAND, :611' 07205' VZND8HCAHH w'l DAVE DAVENPORT 704 NE HAZEL DELL AVE VPNCOOVER, WA 98665 PARS PLACE CA,P.DEN COURT PORTLA, Nf), OIL SERYICI C( w '010 SW BROADWA7 S-401 PORTLAND;' .OR 97205 4 /Ab isimipitiwe , piqpiamis. , .. I 111.1 j Vrillaraille.4102 NIP SE deSbl. allps am _... .. 4 IMO ST VE 1 1110-Mill IIII 11 9 . 4 1.1 1 al i Bpi Fagg Ns. ... Ns/, .... . • • .. NI al Iv .... ree rat mg:" On `July \ \ , 1986, "aPPeared t above names (Fran ay , and acknowledged,' instrument to be Iand deed before me. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON''. My com' m i.SSiOn X l�SS STATE e OREGON County o`�:4� On July .i , 1986 , ers onal ly appeared '`'she above ; name raidine B. Day and acknowledged. t e for" go:ir_g instrument �- deed �,�oltir.�.ar� act .r7a de� �.ore me. rd Eki:I :'BIT. T ;a tracts, col a,nC 1':1 ;.+,ection 35, .�ToU°:rsh p 1� So�:tn, Range 1� tail lace tte Meridian, Wa∎ hing :on Coun �y, Oregon co:1•�e:ved to v recorded in Be o., 451, Shoop:.n�g Plaza, Incwrporatec, o , �Deea re � Washington': County Oregon Deed . Fkecords, the boundary od; whxc doscribedi as follows e at the roost Easterly Sou.t +oa °t,.. rne r of LC: ITA TERR °SCE,. a' st:bdNrisian of record in ;tiasha.ngtan "nount.. y, Y, Oregon, on and '"' running thence, South 01'' degrees. 57' West along tbe! Easter 1'v line Of those tracts of land conveyed to Benol,,' "Incorpozated, oy Deed recorded in boo). 548, page 657, and to Chester E. Klock, et "ux, and Chester .E'. ";, said' Deed ' Klock Jr. , 'et ux, by' de° d" recorded in Boo)' ,:511., ' "page 55 Records, 553.90 feet to a point which nears West '6.50 .'feet "froaa the r (st Southerly corner of the John L. Hic}:li'n .Donation Land C'lai;n No. thence East 6.50' feet to said c lair ►a` . corner being also 'the most Nab • u f that tract of ,3a�d con eyed to 'Robert A. B�issett ;voo therly corner. c►,. � � ! V- and Fred A. Anderson," ,by Deed recorded ''in . Book 493, page ,172, sa\,id ?eed Records, thence South 31 degrees 36' East al.o'nc; the Easterly' • 18 9 0 feed= '' line of said B' sett ana Ands. son. Tract, to the most. -' � �- ether �:ti• line of Center Easterly corner thereof, � o00 point on the Via_ ,� `�� ee s 23' . East i% Ding Street '; (County Road ho . 15 ; thenc_ GNo_ ,.h 6 2 i, 5 of saic \o tnerly line, 00.12 feet` to �.he most ,Soutane:lti corner• o that tract f � ° e Plaza, incorporated by o� land ccn�e� _� r t'ci Tigard d .: ~ , :. ppi�'9 a1 cz�.c Sho A ♦ Deer recorded a.n Book. 441, page 766, Rain Deed Records, according to the second desc> iptiori 'in to Deed; thence along the �iesterly and the North �. h 31 d e 9 ,. o.- Northerly line of the last �Faer-,tio'rned' Plaza Tract, No� � r _es 36' West, 183.97 feet, hor�.-h l�,l degrees 57 Ease, 338.72 feet and t 191.12 feet to a point on the westeriy� • . South 88 dei,rees 03' East, feet ,-, Igo ' 53 , North 01 line of the Thomas At Stott Donation Land. Claim . degrees 01' East, 97.27 feet frOri the most Southerly corner thereof to.c.Ince North 01 degrees 01' East along said claim line, 402.5i feet ' to the Northeast corner car tie Plaza Tract first abov'e i mentioned ; thence North 89 decrees 02' West along " the Northerly line of said . Pla a Tract, 234.59 feet, to the Easterly line of �D�lITA TERRACE; thence South 01 degrees 57' titiest,'along said "Eastern► line, "08.3' feet to the point of beginning. ,Eb'tt -e .A:J r 'Ep.7' Q� All personal property roar or ;ned �` S T JET ,an ath d its to ti a a l� .._ �_�h_r m. �li�z�� conn�,.ionna, eau t ` operation 0, f the Pro / : e "Par ^e Garden Cb.�rt e es in the na :i,.. 1a4.. rr. r ■ .. —... �♦ ►: «..n. .. .• , «0000 SUBJECT TO: __0061 ; 00,10 • -A1,1 : au..rr....ren t -p open tv taxes nom - delincuer t . - premises -herein described are within and sub3ect to the T , statu or .po•.aers . a.neiuding the power of assessment of the Unified Sewerage Agency of 'viashi.ngton County. a municipal corporation. ? o -unpaid Assessments a �.of t: e to hereof ) Ri, hts o f the g public in s "‘Ireets, ,loads and hi g��•sys. 4. Ari easement including the tees and t g pr ®v�,sons 4hereoe, From: Tigard Shopping Plaza, I:aO. , a corporation To: Tigard Sanitary District, a municipal corporation Recorded: September 1, 1961 v:'dok: 448 Page: 731 Records of Washington County, Oregon. 5. .. l g e provision" 5. An easement, a.nc uc3 � n t..h � terms and �� � the: eo From: Tigard Shopping Plaza, 111c-, an Oregon con pore :ion To: Robert A. Bissett and Fred A. Anderson Recorded: April 12, 1965 Book: 548 Page: 170 Records of Washington County, Oregon. 6. An easement, including the tekms and provisions thereof, From: Benol, Inc.,' a corporation. To: Benol, Inc., of Oregon, an Oregon corPozation Recorded: September 23, 1965 Book: 570 Page: 214 Records of Washington County, Oregon. i ee�nent gr for easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, ; o Between: Benol, Inc., of Oregon, 9 n co. moo_ ation, Benol, O egos, � orat�an and � , Inc., Washington core nd Ti g Ord Shopping a t�ashi�n Plaza, Inc., an Oregon corporation Recorded: PSeptembe .9 : September 23, 1965 BtYYQk. 570 ?age,'; 2I7 Amended by instrument, Recorded: November 18 1965 Book: 578 P .ge: Records of Washington, County, O..egon. , FO e "-IDt,3ii ..,., and sanitary �.,..... _ . 0100 - - - - ..i1.r1�:L�.�+..s.. r.a+.�e......- r.. �.: L.: r«.. �-. �- rr. +�...... :�.....,. : « :w�+'�..x,.+ �.ii ;. � • .A i :. � i b'tL wY i..w l�j .,ii t �. 666,0,= 6.xa- e.:z��eat '- .��:w�.'s►rovl i .. •i. w.i i. :K..� ✓. LK_. .i +.Y.�4 V .t��� � f �. . r�� - Y'faZ.o�1S 7`ao: _...�.��:. 0060. „l ..� =��shxa�gt_. �ar,�rBtiYm��Y; • Y.�.. ♦ t..Yj.j :.. ..o, .....,,, .sees �'C].ock 'arid tae o k; u iaand a=� d w-lfe, ems. +Li ~1�.eCo-111 February 18 Y .965 ,boo • �; _.� `� a :• .j.. � _ 1 asx..1 :. .x x - i{,