The URL can be used to link to this page

SUB1994-00002POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. rak.: y`a._ (� � r' •i ➢ a;. ., .. 1+ + 9 .x. h Y° +.��.. ,�aN'J � � °; r! Tviy�lA; • N,• 5 . ^ 100 • SCALE V \ \ • 1 4t 5 ::::C i i k 18 t '(C 4' itv,,,,,tw lots 64441 615 APPROVtD MY or IICIAttp FT 206.6 EIG 205.6 ,F'0 205.6 1+88.8 stag ,1 TC 203,? 613 1 +88.8 Eke 203,'7 a TC 203.2 EO 263.4 TC 203,3 FT 204.7 03 +3�i� E 202,6, TC 2026' HOU SE tx`I SI\ it-4e e?Ak CONSTRICT E.S.C. E0 20113 TC 201i5 f' E6 201,8 FO 201.8 :EXIST. STR.t : ,.. S TO REMAIN THI AR 0 0 0 0 0 +45 J. a s :. rNiw rs •.vi. .efe: r►ti m ammo iwi • tir. :nir mien •. w egiro STATE OF . OREGON County of Washington., City`, of Tigard AFFIDAVIT OP MAILING so. 1 say t (Please print That I am : `1J 1�' ^ tr:' :. for The City of Tga'. d, Oregon. That I served' NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING FOR: l That I served NOTICE OF DECISI ©N. FOR: City of ¶hgal :d Planning > Director .: ""argard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Decision) of whi h is attached (Marked Exhibit '' hibit "A was maj.led to each named persons at th citareSs . shown o` he attached list marked exhibit *B" on the day of ,r 19 , said notice NOTICE OF DEL4TPIoN as h et0 att,ached„ was p st on an appropriate day ; . �....,.._.., + and p d bulletin board on the da of �. �� day �' ��... _. . tr c�� a � �` in the United States Nail on the ��... da of .�„� postage prepaid., .� Notice �,�"``,��° ► j 0 PrICIAL SEAL DldFNE M.JELDER kS NOTARY PWBLIc.OREG N t ) COMMISSION NO. 00907/ CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOVICE OF OINAL ORDER - B1! HEARINGS OFFICER . Concerning Case Number (s) SUB 94:4602 . Name of Owner: 9.12rl Kreick..�...�.�., Name of Applicant: Tbrr rU .nVns1 /t iG� V4, Address LAC/ Boer 1577 City Beave�c'tti/V,�aa State OR zip 70` 5 I.�Wq Irlmae .i- .alI�YI'ILCtlnWl✓R',Cll ®. � wsNM®c�..MmurM /ymY, � �i . Address of Property: . 91 35 SW Durham Road Tax Map and Lot No(m).: 2S1 X"bC tarc7"00 . RegU0st: The applicant requests Subdivision i vision Prelimnary Plat approval to divide onrl. parcel rig approximately 0.65 cres into four lots between 5,070 and 6, 8 i 24 square feet in € ize. APPLICABLE . P . 7.1.2, 7.3.1* armprehensive Plan Policies AYP: �'.�'IiCW �R'1°T`�1Rlt'�. 7 . !� . 4, ` 1.6.1, ' 8.1.1 } and 8 + , 0 0 Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 8.88, 18.92, 18.%0C, -,18.1020 18.108,E 13.114, 18.150, 18./60, and 18.164. "Is.ne: R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre) deta�chederesiderntal2�niit s,de�h�ictiorn allows singlefamily p su ppo rt facilities, residential treatment homes, f rMing, manufactured homes, home occupations, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. . Action: Approval as reenested Approval with condition Denial tAIMMILIMMONIMIOMI p p teed at City Hall, andit�aiYed to: was published in the newspaper, , ©r, pos .�..?�..1,. The applicant ti'. and owner(s) X dyers of record Within the required distance K The affected Citizen Involvement T'ea, Facilitator X Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: VH3 DEC/SION SHALL BE FINAL ON _Itt as ,; LI. ,,... UNLE3B AN APPS IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall, P.G. Box 2339/ Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. A, ea ll : Any party to the decision may appeal this deci ion in accordance with 18 .32 , 290 (B) and Section 18.32.370 which provider that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appppa ,.dl may be submitted (ted on City forms and must be UJ accompanied the appeal fee ( $315.00) and transcript costs (varies up ®.1 to a i I1Ximt. of $50000). The deadline for filing of s'.r appeal le 3:30 p .. .Ae�a 10 . estiona: If you have e . ly questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 619-4171. '..• F µl4 �i��l ylrc -�,'. ,.y '. �. ik 'J1.•.: .,,_- � +,�, BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON In the Itlatter of an application b' Four "D" Construction ) Eii4ALDEDIR for approval of a relimin�• � for division for 0.65 ogres in the 7 gone at lot /and ), SUB 94-0002 9185 SW Durham Road in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) ,reick Meadow) 1. The ' g � hereby adopts and incorporates-herein the findings of the hearings officer h %re Tigard Community Development Department Staff Report dated March 28, 1994 (the "Staff including summary, .� g and i and . surroundings, applicable Report"), inclu�im, �e su�tnrn findings about the site hand surrou�adi , approval standards, NPO and agency comments, and evaluation of the request. r The March , •.. ,e ys . duly •. • , ° • .F 1 gf , g the - � ; 2. Thy hearin s officer conducted a dulw noticed public hearing regarding � . appllication on M 28, l:'�... The following testimony was offered at the hearing in relevant part. a. City planner Victor Adoad. summarized port. He noted that the Staff Report. Tigard Community Development Code ("CDC") section 18.100 requires permanent fencing abutting the proposed private street serving the proposed lots, but does not require fencing around the subdivision generally. Staff recommended the applicant construct a fence around the site durhict construction, but did not recommend permanent fencing, except abutting the Jprivate &l en, b{ Dale Deliarpport testified for the applicant: He accepted hW p ' tie Staff Report generally, but disputed the need for a construction or permanent fence wound the bite. He g already side and that another fence should argued there ahead ' is a fence along the east ,gds of the site, and that site be required q there, He argued a fence at the 18.102. cIVir�De a site wound violate cite norghw est " arpport introduced a document entitled "City of Tigard Fence and Wall Requirements" document section » requirements �rernel'1ts10 irn support of this the vision clearance re LurF,, rhents rn a intient, He argued a fence, photinia hedge, and arborvitae hedge exist along most of the west side of the site and that apfence along hedge, portions of the site would be duplicative. He argued existing in problems of trespass (see below) will be resolved when the site is developed. He requested that recommended condition of approval l3 be construed to allow existing trees along the Durham Road front e to count as street trees: c. Mary Stow owns property west of the site (lot 616). She expressed i g concern about use of the site fur a residential treatment home riteria for subdivAs` responded that such a concern is not relevant to the approval .The, la for a s officer ion. A Pp residents "gal treatment borne is a use permitted by the existing zoning. Stow also P p Y g g� favor g west the site where such a fence does not testified in savor of a fence along the �ve�t s�,v.e;of th already exist, d. Doug Balsillie testified for himself and Gene and Eileen freeman. He • applicant remove apple and filbert trees situated near the property line, requested that the apn ' � pple and p p rty p about trespass across i w Lane to Durham ' way to and from Tigard .ioha Oakmeadow He ex- cussed concern � stating that been .. ,:... • t 3a ...y ti �t.. a y .. load by students on their • Y � � � jm �, , such trespass has been a problem: He urged the hearings officer to require the applicant to install a fence around the site to deter such trespass. . the west of the site (lot 615) He argued in favor of fence where hsite abuts Sumnmerfield �A � property �l�e ►' .. e: Arthur Denlceir owns the , iest�fied the arborvitae hedge on Page 1 Heatings Officer Final Order SUB 94 -0002 (krekk 111rado4 s) his property is not dense enough to protect his property from adve-ese, impacts of trespass and developmer t on the subject site 3. At the conclusion of the hearing, the hearings officer held open the record for seven °calendar days der the hearing to receive addxtionail evidence: 'luring that time, the following written evidence was intro(uced into the record, and has been considered by the hearings officer p. A letter received April 1, 1994 from An G. Denker to Victor'Adonri arguing in favor of a fence around the site where it adjoins Summerfield, Among (Am testimony, Mrr, Denker stated such a fence would be 12 feet from Oakmeadow Lane and would impair sight distance, if at all, no more than existing vegetation on adjoining lots in Surnmerfield. He argued that the fence is needed to protect the privacy and certain aesthetic features of homes in Summerplace. b. A letter dated April 1,194 from Beverly Swink of t17.2 Stunmerf eld Civic Association to the heart/1gs officer arguing in favor of a fence around the site where it adjoins Summerfield. co A letter dated April 4, 1994 from John Benneth to the hearings officer, raising concerns that notice of the March 28 hearing was not mailed to the Sumrner field g site Association and arguing in favor of a fence around the site where it adjoins Summerfield. d A letter dated April 4, 1994 ofrom Neil e Jeremiah e i d to to icoe Adorn arguing , in favor of a fence around the site where it a j ,iins Su r protect certain trees, together with attachments, including a January 14, 1994 letter from Four 1� to Eugene g a and Eileen Freeman, letters dated January, 1994 from the Eree;rnans and letters dated l ebruary 23, 1994 frown the Preemans, Martha Ironsides, f the Denkers, and Mary Stow to the Planning Commission with conerns and recommendations regarding the subdivision. "rx> After the hearing, the hearings officer visited 1 i ng officer the site. The l ear, n s officer Observed the substantial conifer and deciduous trees and shrubs on the Durham load site property. The hearings officer observed the potential pedestrian route frontage of the propert;,.o. hearings p � p �'� s , Road to la meadow Lane. The �hearinge of the site sery the the across the site from Durham, fidesP g west edges Qrortions of the site. The hearings effu er observed on the east and asst ��es of ' � � the ertc g p hearings sight distance from the driveways for lots 615 and 614 in Summerfield and the visual S ` . "` f characteristics of Oakmeadow Lane, The hearings officer observed the lack of buffeting between the site and the home north of the site (lot 614), The hearings officer observed the i vicinity of the site particularly the relatively character of the homes in Surni�erfield in the site, small lot sizes, relatively large homes, extensive front yard landscaping, and common architectural themes and features of those homes. Ilia_DISCUSMON 1. City staff re&'oinnmended approval cf the application subject to conditions in the hearings officer .... • ti K w , i • e .. , all the The t plicable st dards fo te a 1 cation and fndin s showing the application complies with applicable star , Pp � g Pp P ards Those officer adopts in large part. To the extent the findings those standards. fin mgsarenotd are not disputed, the hearings o pts thein as his own in support of a decision to Page - -- icie'ddng,x Ofj'icef Finds Order SUB 94.0O! (leketck Meadows) a -. approve the subdivision subject ''o the condilicas recommended in the ; f Report except a as expressly provided otherwise below. 2. Recommended condition of approval 13 requires the applicant to install at least four street trees along the SW Durham ,tt 4d frontage of die alt The site contains more than four substantial; trees on or abutting the right of way next to Durham Road. , The applicant requests that the hearings'. officer recpgnnirg those trees are adequate fuel the requirement of condition 13. The hearings of cer finds that the existing trees along the right of way can fulfill the requirements for street trees in CDC sections 18.100.030 through 18.100.040. CDC section 18.100.040.A authorizes existing trees to be used as, street trees if no cutting or filling will take place within the drip l ite of the trees. Because .. g already is developed with a home d full frontage : y' the alp m� lot cones the i ovem�ents, it is tuba rely that cutting and filling will take place within the dip line of the trees. 'Therefore, those trees can count as street trees. If the applicants removes the existing trees, then, replacement trees should be installed consistent with CDC section 18.100 °050. 3. The principal disputed whether the applicant to install a fence around the subject site where it adj oins the erfield devel op ment to comply with the a pplicable standards. a. CDC section 1 8.100.130 (Figure 1) describes when one use is required to provide a buffer to protect another use. `I'ha t section does not iequire a buffer where a single family detached dwelling in an R7 zone is proposed adjoin +gang single family h � . is ro osed, to �.d °Dire exis detached dwellings. CDC section 18.100.130 does not require the applicant to provide a fence where the site abuts Stunzmerfield, p n ryry plat is required to comply with the Comprreheu.ssve Plan b. A • relixu,'�q�. .1 i i s C p Plan p ° ' not require the applicant to fence the site. policies. The uoro rel"ien,; sve P'1au ohe ^,><es do n c. Several witnesses argued the applicant should be required '1'r% fence the ' , • ...." 1 ` • M # ^ ` the Site, • pp agreed Hal ixteetr<n (s) with ri11e1";a�rc.rs of community. However the ,t CDC does not require the applicant to abide by such a prior<:', y g agreement assuming it was made. d. 'C section 18 100110 requires the to install a fence or C��. requires e buffe g ....". proposed private street` The applicant argues an existing buffer along outside edge of the .c ° f ve400t tall wood fence along that prope - ty lane already fulfills that requirement. The CDC does not clearly address the issue. (1) CDC section 18.100.070.B provides in relevant part that "(t }he owner of each proposed development i,. responsible for installation and effective is Trees ousible the maintenance of buffering and screening.' Because the fence along the private drive is a g 1 the r ° requires the required screen, e hearings officer finds CDC section A8.100 °070.1 re aprlicant to install it. (2) Where an adequate fence already exists, the hearings officer finds CDC section 18.100.070.B does not require an additional parallel fence to be built, because its purpose is filled by the existing fence. The existing a ce alng a p see of the east property line is adequate, because it is opaque and five feet high; therefore, the adjoining property from vehicles in the driveway. (3) Required landscapin3 should be provided on the site, enforced '" a plan submitted to and approved i.. to install ant (ot''an associauoirt of by p pp , j d by the Crly The applicant purchasers of lots in the subdivision) ` hRand be required a fence along the drive if Page 3 - Hearings Offker Find Oder SUB 94-00 02 (Kri ick Mead` ws ) 0:: fly fi ,IMA4keadelEIMINEIM ' • v• , and where the existing fence on the abut g property is removed. A condition to this effect is warranted, e. The applicant argues CDC 18.102 prohibits a fence at the northwest corner of the site where it touches Oakhneadow Lane, because a fence there would obstruct the visual clearance area of the driveways east and west of that point, • (1) CDC section 18,102.020.A provides that ' "a visual clearance area shall be mainrained on the corners of a driveway providing access toa ,public or private street." C '"C section 18,101020,B prohibits fences or landscaping exceeding the feet in height in a clear vision area. (2) CDC section 18 102.050 defines how to compute the visual clearance.:u.ea for the intersection of a non-arterial ,greet (such as Oa1tnet►dow Lane) and a driveway (at 614 and 615 S ornnterafield). In words, it is described as follows: i`]he triangular area whose base extends 30 feet along the • ..street g line of the .rig way from the c.enter • by wa l at the front setback line of a single family ... residence. tdri a yj � (3) The hearings officer cannot determine whether the visual clearance area for lots 614 and 615 Summerfield would prohibit a fence at the northwest corner of proposed lot 3, because the driveways on lots 614 and 615 are not identified on p d 5 -foot front setback (for lots 614 and any scaled drawing in the record. Assuming a 1 yard ( and given the location of the driveways question, esl the he g r► officer estimates 615), � small portion of the northwest corner of proposed may al clearance that a a �.. granted, . then, northwest corner to avoid the visual clearance on area for lots 614 and 615 If that is true, yen, unless a variance is ranted, a fence proposed lot 3 would have to be aingll�d at the Werth ,� ' � � i� �"ance area for lot 614 and 615. That could isolate a small area outside the fence, Access 'or maintenance purposes should be allowed e means of a gate or other means if a fence is • p rp ley g 1 may be in the visual g f a observed vegetation on lots 614 and 615 y built. The hearings officer clearance area and may be higher than permitted there. That vegetation may need to be trimmed to comply with the law. f, The hearings officer agrees with the applicant that the potential for ¢'y� ,� is much less after The tAee� as situation across the site (from ��lrnneado fence t� Durham Road) is trespass development of the site with or without a • p rneicecurs, in part, clear line of sight from the driveway at because the property is not deWeloped�dow �arne.sw�nen •g� 2 driveway J Durham Road to the corner at Oakme �d td�rl ,�r� and � are Arent that developed with homes, that line of sight will be obstructed, the � apparent . : may . in past. Mor hearings ;� a adest;�'ian route rna have existed Ott the Moreover, a hearitn s officer observed evidence on the ground, well -worn pathway, that trespass across the little e round such as a property occurs frequently, and ubserved that a particularly lethal rose bush planted at the Oakmeadown Lane frontage and landscaping on lots 614 aid 615 discourage trespass : through that point. It is possible that the new private drive (serving lots 2 through 4) will : provide pedestrian i ::l ... such reach e a new ede5trian route that will allow trespassers to cross lot 3 to g potential trespass w, Oakmeadow Lane, but the hearings officer funds that. the teritiai foe• h tree ass is to g. Residents of homes adjoining the site want to protect their privacy and . sectnity by requiring the applicant to fence the site. A fence could help do so, particularly aloe. the northeast and north edges of the site where there is no existing landscaping or r lots. : fi relatively :. 1, aa'nd homes are other buffering on adjoining Lots in �nm►rrrterrield are small, back and sides of the lots. Surnrnerfield contains few if any school age situated tr��a�d the ba i children; most residents are older adults. It is a planned unit dovelopmnent. These and other Page 4 -u tiea ings Officer final Order SYId 94,0002 (Kreick Mcadott4) features makes suinmerfield different from the proposed sut &Y sion m subtle. A fence could help p res rVe and proteot.those differences• t (1) fiecat se uses on and ad oining the site the same s and le i' e siiy ttcd. etached dwelling s - -r CDC : tion 18.l O1) does not require the applica:' to fence '�. �� ' (2) Tie heaiin off leer . vecogniies that the site and SumnierfiA we designated as " establish. areas ►► on the ksity development district snap• egar+ sue; area. comprhe ive plan policy., 63.3 provides: ,} a s obieious In all phi of the develepzuent approval process in a , iderit! established area, a primary consideration of the City shy be try preserve and enhance the character of the adjacent 0s fished peas. (3) The hearings officer fads that the &Ter aces in charaeter etween Surnmerfleld and I nick Meadows are staifiicient : warrant a coodimon req ng the applicant to instal a m' rnunt five -foot tall, signtwobsc ug fence across the north edge of the site and along the east edge of the site north of the drive 4y tract to comply with policy 6,3.3.1 Without such a fence, the' chaacter of the establ "shed residential area ran arnerileid will not be protected. (4) The he:wings officer further finds that such a fence is not necessary tc protect the character of the established residential area where a similar sueh fence already exists (e.g., along the east side of lot 616) or where substantial landscaping. exists (e.g., along most of the east side of lot 615). There is a. small portion of the east edge of lot 615 (i.e., between the existing photnma and the arborvitae hedges) that is not fenced or landscaped. To comply with policy 6.3.3, the beatings officer finds the applicant provide five-foot tall, sight-obscuring fence in that, area. should be required to: provide a minimum %� LCQ Based on the above findings, and the conclusions in section VI of the St Deport, r q comply .._ applicable of the City of the applicant's �z asst does or can corn 1 with the a livable ataiidards o Tigard Community Development Code and should be approved, subject to the conditions of approval . in the Staff Re o��t with minor Chan: �es, P y pp request„ . ( b w a applicant's SUB �4 -��D2 (Kreick Meadow), is hereby approved, subject to the conditions in Section VI of the Staff Report, with the following amendments I Condition of approval 4 is hereby amended to add the following: ` pp y +gig" • agreement shall ag mall res�uite U■wiler�S of properti��s in the suhdivisi�`,n .,, high g periphery of t d to tC maintain the on-site Itetnces aloe the � he life aa,� build a minim= five -foot high oparlue fence along the east edge of the driveway tract if the existing fence on the west edge y lot i S • e east of the tract is removed. a of they to the comprehensive rehensive -, ,an acid other applicable ordinances and regulations..," as are n out CDC 18. 160.0600 0 authorizes the hcarial s officer to attach such cconditions ecess;', t to h "f 1 r P � iy Page 5 -- Hearings Officer i' i, cit Order SUB 94 -0002 (Xreick Meadows) • ib,6� Y; tt e applicant o shy b th a' plan to and receive , apprOlfel of ap'wrdpnaat° Plan from the Planign g.Division for the folio igt rr a itu 'nu iv ‘-foot higtz opaque (fence',Ong the o no ,:and east edges of the site to the extent sue a,'glee or vc get\don c,Z' an equal height daes no A �y e ?:. " the At the norrt'coer of lot 5, tlie'fence a i not obstruct staal clearance area for to '614 and 615. The appl<<va at shy: ins the ,fences °e, X44 latOscapmg on the plan app oveti by the Planning biVision before approval, of the final plat or shall guarantee instillation pUrs!ant to 2i _ �� o'irernent ag , -t exit or equity security approved b f the Cite, Condition of approval 13 is hereby anende4 to add the follow in Existing trees along the Durham oad frontage can fulfill the requirements for street trees if they are retained and protect t.:d consistent with CDC 4'eciion 1, 8 / 40A. Page 6 breabthgs C)flieet Ptnal OYtlkt stm 94-0002 (`rrirk Nlea 1 wi) egarding ap lieatlrn by Four Comstructio,t, E , PORT T �orapony for ft subdiVision conpf,stiug apprmtrariatel 665 acres located at 9185 SW burban3 goad S AIO: The applicant requests Subdivision approval to divide a p rcei ,consist in of approximately 0,65 acres into four lots ranging in sive from. 5,O7C) squaite feet to 6,824 square :3ety APPLICANT: . George eick'. '. �'a�lir '� Construction �'tl��. P.0 Box 1577 9185 SW Durham A Beaverton, OR 97075 Tigard, OR 97224 COMPREHENSTM Pte` DESIGNATION: Low Density Residenla ZONING DESIGNATION: R -7 (Residential, 7 units per acre) LOCATION: 9185 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 1IDC, tax lot 7400) APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development b ode Chapters 18 5�.0, . O , 18.88, 9(2, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 18.160 and 18.164. Comprehensive PlanPncc s:. 4,2,1, 7.1?, 7.3.1, 7.4.4. 8,1.1; and 8.1 STAFF . RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to couditaonsb H A1�I TOS' OFFICE - SU 4- 2 o r " i nstructiot Co. 6, , -1 . i 14 ✓f, r. ii , The site located on the nod {th skde of , load, d^ out : eadow 1 e, adjacent, to the Smite eld d welopa entp The subject parcel, is developed with an existing single family resideneew Will retained. a few evergreen trees located along �st�g, residence �a0.� be JC et�t'�wdi , 'there �f`� the southern grope r►` line, and a^ few shrubs, grass, and flowering plants locate on the interior ' of the site. 11111,3itiniaelliseat Properties to the north and west of the site are zoned for single family residential development at a density of 7 units per acre, and are largely developed. Properties to the south re zoned R -4i5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre). Six ro ertie'F) to the east are zoned R-7 (Resideinial,, 7 units per acre), all other properties to the east are zoned -4.5 (gesiJevit),al, 4.5 units per acre). The whole area is substantially developed. Tigard 1410\ School is located imMediately south of the proposed development. J , ' 1NCS OPPICER, - SUB 94-0002 . Four le onst .uetk n III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STAINWRD S ; is nidirtttr R, 4tptkenteCodeet a .. lantir i . Section 18,52 contains standards Single family detached residential units are a permitted use in comply with the fo . g di ne ional requiremen ts Minimum lot size Average lot width Profit setback Garage setback terior sideyard setback Corner sideyard setback Rear setback Maximum building height 15 feet 20 feet 5 feet 10 feet 15 feet 35 feet fitagreAcceest Section 18.88.040(C)(1) contains solar; access standards for new residential development, A lot meets the basic solar access lot standard if it has a north-south d'imensirm of 90 feet or more and has a front lot line that is oriented within 30 degrees of a true east -west axis. A subdivision complies with. the newly created tots meet or exceed the basic requirement it' 80% or more of t is standard. Dens Section 18.92.020 contains standards for density, The number of wr . g P. net development areal excluding sc,isitive { ,welling uni'�s permitted is based on the ne lan public private areas and land dedicated for ubli� loads ®�� parks, or for ". �vate roadwaaysa This land area is then divided by the minimunt parcel site permitted by the xon ig district to determine the number of lots which may ay be created on a site, Section ,106 cOttAins landsc' ping standards fol. new dev ,opine it, di�►tr�ict requires a minim= n 20% landscape coveragO, lthi site. The R-1 zoning requires with applicant trust comply vv�ith these requirements, The applicant must, also comply with the standards set forth in Section i8 100.035 which details the requirements for street trees in a residential subdivision, i + The requiretaent.stateS that all development projects fronting on a public, private street, or a privat driveway more than 10Pd feet in length, shall be required to plant street trees. • HEARINGS ► 94-Ij . F`o1'aa�'''1i Const ottion „,,, r �Y, : ' ' ��'' , ire es that a dear `: ko'nr ea` r °cenn t inters right -off r a the eiritersection of a public 'meat at d ,a p,, to d ►►ve , .. ;. e vigott, at a conta vehrel e, hedg c. eia f n en obsresn eedwee ' mit, b 9,:?t red C` omt' o curb or where'. no curb a ; ts, ,from th st c t ce Ladr es f t �eding t `s height may. be locate tgin t '', s area 1.04' ec 311 x h ' -, ei are re ov,�d. A visual dean aria e trial 'area �� ei�,�t Feet ar t �� lay, ar�d► w ° ai by`' ,ea: n a 30 foot distance ",long” 0� stet ri .. w' + +/� � ��. `.. 6 i.ILM � �ti Kia ve d Mien eo�eet�g these tG�►o 30 foot distance points wi t', ' ti , . Sec orx 8.108 °d '® conta s Slat da rds for single r� --- � jJ .. . a �'; ! may �'� ° � t'�'C"iss for , `x�' residential vehicular ar recess, I `ivate drive y p de a. Yna d '►tim of six residei ices° A common private aceessway which serves betweep i residences must be t'ria of 30 feet wide vith itxitt three to s� �, pavement width of at least 24 feet; etrbs and a walkway. Iteleemmalt ` . f�" rem►ova� of trees: Section '�8. ,tr °112O',, j) re ttfres a pefor, t havin g a stunk 6, inches or ire5re in diameter measured feu r feet above the ground the b � with �1 on undeveloped residential land. A permit for tree re noVal must eorupl following criteria as spw d/ied in Section '18,150.030(A' 18150 030(A The trees are dise,.sed present a danger to property, or int ere with utility service or traffic safety; � r prop l i`bv'ea�e�t", The frees l�a�we to �e removed to construct � =o "dosed �. otherwise utilize the applicant's .. pr+epe " ,t a r`easo'�4bi . ox to : manners The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, .bit problems; o - needed to proteet� earlaY trees as WiI1! rep. trees are n t � ,4, • , at a desirable balance betweepi shade and open space ;," The aesthetic. character 1n ere area will not be visually, 4 affected bY the tree reriova?..' '►d ' 3. Th 0 streets nd road must be, laid out Aso as to onform to of subdi.viitions and map of partitionS or subdivisions Etirda' approved for ,adjoining pr()perty as to width, genera 1, iocOr.:- and in a other respect S Unless the City determines it is in the public interest, to modify the Street or road pattern; and explanation has been provided for all common improvements. t , A , v Section 18,164 contains standards for streets and 3. Section 18'16'1'1)6° Pkoltibits lot depth from being more thin AA 2.5 f:iities the lot width and requilTes that lots have at least, 25 /itieet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. - section i$� 4� OO requires . adequate previsions for " ;'1orin runoff dcdication of easements; foristo rm. drainage • •. Y i b A • U� . J : Policy 2.1.1 provides the City ill assure that citizens w ''be aro• idcd an opportunity to piricipate m a l phases of the c ev lopment review process. j r ity: Policy 4.2.1 provides that all leveloptnent with; the Tigard urban .. planning area shall comply with appliabl federal, ` state and regional water . quality standards. Policies 7.1.2, 7.2J.1 and 7.4 provides that the City will require a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storms drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and that utilities shall be placed underground. Fi a ro i : Policy 7.6.1 states that Fire District sha11 review all new development applications to ensure adequate Fire Protection is available to serve each new developments .-1p rov elue a. Policy 8.1.1 provides that 1 plan for a safe and efficient stree t and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development St Yrriproyements. Policy 8,1.3 states that the City wiin require the following as a precondition of approval: Development abut a dedicated street or have other adequate access- ,t he Street is substandard in �tireet ri ht' of wai srAall be _ ed��at��4 �`,jere ••'The •developer shal!f cc rnn'I t to 4�arastrnc ;ion of the streets c rhs d sideE�ailts ro Ci standards hin the deveio mein �= AR�i N%S OFFICER SUB 94- � Construction d n e developer shall participate in ]ie improvement o existitt g r suedi curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the develop ent's inipa Street improvements shall 4 made and Street si r signals sham lue p ' mtx y bra s i �ao��ded when when the development is found to cr eate or ens" a hazard. 114 OTHER R $TMF COMMEN TS The City of Tigard 'Engineering Department has reviee ved the proposal and offer the foliowing comments: Streets: The project will take access from a proposed private driveway connecting to SW Durham Road. SW Dvrhaui Road is classified as a Major Collector on the Comprehensive Plan, and has b p •. been dedicated and improved to the ultimate width. No additional street construction is required with the exception of the removal of the existing driveway that serves the existing residence, The driveway f , the existing i. " � "ng house will be re-routed to the new private access that will serve all four propo ed lots, Sanit .. . ewer: The applicant proposes to construct a new wain that will correct to the existing sanitary �� • 8 inch public sanit sewer line that as locate: behind the curb �°l SW Durham Road, The exis in g line has the capacity to serve thisdeveloprnent Storrs Drainage The a licant p proposes to collect the storm water r is applicant F � . a new underground system and connect to the existing storm sewer system located in SW Durham load. The applicant should verify that the existing system has the capacity to server this development. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and tine pity has agreed to enforce d Omer lllto 1 -47 Surface 1�Vat ar e Mano ment a lati ns �Resolut��.1 an � g ` gv ...... uirin th, co M ua it facili .yes or xe sin -lieu of th - eir � nstra��.tior� 'of �n axte water q � � z HEAIU GS OFFIGFR S B u T - �4 =UOa� r I�oa� ►►�' Gonistruc�tion moo. I�A�� °� cothgructioon. Requiring . n ace water ,numerous facilities that *mid urthepnore the applicant has Mit natural depressions or other area water guy &ity ci►ales. Regional : ,ae of these facilities, wOuud provide the .re and less maintenanee:,Therefore the a in-lieu of constructing an on -sate fac' i The City of Tigard Operations Department has reviewed the proposal an 47, s the follo g comnentst ' The proposed site plaid does t s h o v e a p u b l i c e a s e n i nt f o r ± . h e a 1ta ,sewer. There needs to be a manhole installed where ti" e *catch basin line connects to existing storm line. Property fronting SW Durham load shoittd maintain °that' portion of iandsc pe on that frontage. The City of Tigard 8uilding Division has reviewed the proposal and the following comments: The existing residence shall con eet t) sewer if not already connecte All cone e p. i a concentrated storm wi'at�r shall. be drained to the �v,�te drive, V. CIT & AGENCY COM .._ IVIEN'T'S The facililitator for the South Citizen Involvement Team was, ...w. ` ' Involvement notified of the proposed subdivision„ The . eam has not provided any comments r�AS or Involvement � . objections to this development. In addition, applicant c�a�adixcted a negl�borhnod meeting. The Surrttrieriielc l Civic .Association has reviewe d the proposal` an&'` offers the following comments: o Review all development plans; insuring that ail regU ed sethacks� drain ge and general zo�nin� req irements side met by the de'Ii.'cloper l-IEA IN GS OFF CER = SUB 94.0 022 Pour Canst%ietia ii ($ PAGE g ueste We would lilt to know what enan i ;any, the eeelope anti respect to t developme e tat ow nr�n, of restriction( or guide l ncs keiatin to e tae raa..: ed4 Tue Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue e District the following co ,uents'4 d3 A No Parkii g r �i s ialll he, t� street. Fire hydrant is required within SQO leet of a measured around the outside of the structure Grit roadway. rtions .o f', a strrtict ong. approved acce Fire hydrants locations will ` be co-approiwe. v itb the 'ire . strict Tigard Water Department. ;, Q other comments was received by the F$aru 1g E ' OFFICER SUB 94i d Fuu �1n.etrnctiofl I ' LI Vi. EVALUATION OF REQUEST �L' e,!,yelop. The proposed subdivision complies with the use standards of the i 4µa'7 zoning district (Code Section 1332) becaus.?/ the lots are intended to be used for single family detached dwelling units. Single family residences are listed as a *. permitted use in this zone. The proposed four (4) lots, which range in size between 5,070 and 6,824 square feet, are all either equal to or larger than the minimum requirement of the R -7 zone of 5,000 square feet, As shown on the preliminary site plan., the existing residence on lot #1, w y a is _� R-7 zone. A� proposed to be retained meets all set�,� retained - �k requirements of the IR proposed subject to r, the R-7 zone. � lC� ro osed lots with shall be part the building , er.�t the. setback standards, � tl Compliance with these standards will be reviewed as p .• t of the _ g, p application process for residential structures. Solar Access. Lot #4 meet the basic solar . access requirements as specified in The front let v ^ Code Section 18gS 0401 i11. �� line orientation of this lot is within p #1) 30 degrees of true east-west. , north-south t This lot also ro��i es a minimum dimension of at least 90 feet. Of the proposed four lots, one lot (lot # 1) may be counted as the standard 20% exemption from these solar access standards. The remaining , lots (lots 2 and 3) are constrained from meeting the base requirements wa. �.. and due to Yhr, placement of the proposed private 'driveway configuration . °f c '� A the .),1)i) require . compliance with the lots as per Section 1 R.: E , a i "i ....., ��Ta x� strict c e, a lots should.... these standards would reduce the overall density on this site. Th s be exempted form the solar access requirements. Therefore, this Code standards have been satisfied. 1,)ensity. The net developable area of the site, after deduction of the public right- of-way �23 .. 31 square ... feet. The gross pp tel y of -wad is approximately �` , :. - .... ,; � � .. � area is a ro�thma 8,314 square feet. With a minimum of 5,000 square feet } -�P�� lot, yields � g of this site . dwelling units R gdesignation an opportunity zonhn � . llhn orate .,under the for four (4) dire ,, within the density range 4.6 lots). proposed lots are wit ty g Code for the (specifically, .. , � The four , (4) propos � nt C e � site, The provided by the Comprehensive Plan and the Development applicant has proposed thh e creation of four (4) lots and thereby complies with this standard, HEt I�GnS OFFICER - SUR 94 -0002 F'o it "D''� A h') .... C,or+st�raiic3loiro Cod R ca Applicant t shall recluirt,A;o plant Street Trees . ae4prdanee nth ,tbe standards set forth in Section , 18:100 035 fir, addition, `a .20 landscape p / coverage is required for proper'des.;in the T - `i'zon g d stri `C•he o►de der requires that street tree.% be spaced between 20 to 40 feet ,apaJrt depending On the size maturity This site rots eta; Sw lei lip Road see el�ficatioxi of a tree at . ty # for approximately 112 feet. Therefore, '''street trees .are requii(e. A detailed landscaping and street tree plans, was not submitted by the applicant for rovie rw Therefore, the applicant will be rewired to submit to the Planning Dii4sion, a detailed landscaping plan showing sholing provision for the required 20% landsPape coverage, and a street tree planting planping plan., ear 'isi The Planning and I uilding Division w ll reviem each building and other related permits for compliance with setback Standards sit forth for structures within the clear vision area A visual clearance area for all street intersections shall be that triangular area 30 'Feet from the intersection of the rightof »wary. any obstructions street ... Bible �ui�ludA;�g reef trees and Placement of art future o� subdivision identilication s igra shall comply with this standard. Proposed placement of sign and street trees shad be reviewed by the Planning . Division for compliance with the requirements of Sections 18.102 (Vision Clearance) an 18.114 (Signs). eeess .E r rculata ess, liori Section 18.108 and Section. 18.164.060(B) (Lot All lots ar! provided with at least 25 feet of either Frontage) are satisfied. P ublic or private roadway frontage as required by Section 18.164. 'lie four (4) proposed y.. private roadway heading lots are to be serial by a rivate roadwa northward from SW Durham Road. r This proposal complies with the accegs provisions required by Section 18.108. Therefore, these code standards have been satisfied. `1`ree ]E a nov L. Section 18.150 requires that the u m;mb trees ....... inches er of trek over six in diameter that will be removed during construction be minimized. The proposed co .. .. ; i s l t grading will construction of streets, utilities, and residences as well as related require the removal of trees on the site, A detalled tree survey plan was not submitted as part of this application. Prior to the issuance of a tree removal permit, the applicant shall specify the trees being requested removal as they re �estedl for rem relate to: a) public iian roventeants; b) individual lot reparation, ) p _ .P preparation, a ® - r " i Construe ion Co. PAGE 11 HN�S OFFICER �U16 �4 �2 .,' Four A • A 'si'"� i r, 'Se • 8.160:0 0(. ►) provides Sail. dards, e o I v r r 1 subdivision proposals. The sub k� ivision �compbe w►it ;these daxds or r owing reasons: �,' ` ` . .;.. , �� :�iln reh��isive �h ' h+e proposed subdty lion cdmpl es witia p • ,�'.;itesidentiai o o tY for the site as weu as , Map's ]lror ► ,i►., ., . with t 'applicable 'prilli es, a reg lations of the 'R 1 zone, aid ether ! applicable-ordinances and .regulations, � � b � � nU^� 2 • The ro s ts�t, name of the tubdiv!slon, ' eieic eadov '; p duplicative of -ny other plat, recorded in, Washington . .coun ty, • creation �f a private dr�ve.;r�ra] connecting to SW Durhan t Road d "1"he p which is classified as a Major CQ ,ttctor and h,as been dedicate d to width ro dde for both adequate and' safe improved .o the ultrtiate access to the lots in. this proposed subdivision, This development has no direct impact on existing access since the area is substantially, developed. • The, applicant icant has provided an explanation ation for all I common improvements including, the pr ovision for public services such as se wer , w ater, drainage and street improvements. The applicant has s proposed osed to construct a new, Train that will connect to excisting public sewer line in the 'area, connect to an eisting 6 ", ' water line P located in SW OA Meadow Lane, and to collia the store water in a nnw . P r- o osed underground system, No additional onal street ina.provern;:nt is required at this time. utreet n ..t.i i . �l � over ;n i Chapter . 1 .1 P provides standards s for street and d utility improvements, The design of this subdivision is cons ist ent with these e u . irements ... due to the following: r . The applicant l °cant will not be required to dedicate additional right -of, 1 .. way to the public along SW D 'rham •fronta :e. stated in the g Engineering Departments findings on streets, SW Road which is classified as Mayor Collector ;Street, has basn dedicated and irnp roved to the ultimate Width. No additional dedication, and /or improvement is required for this developrnent, UNGS OFFICI R StJB 94 -000 a Fotir` 1)" ( strtictla►It COm PAGE if The applicant did not pre ise ' e creation of,,any loll street o proposed lots are to b seined by a private driveway connecting to Vii*Durharn load Tkterefore, this requirement is not ° applicable to tin's developme to i The proposed lots are ' each less than he "2$ to 1 maximum lot de t ratio. Each lot will abut upon a street other than an depth-to-width r alley for a width of at least 25 feet. The applicant has agreed to board for adtt construc all necessary sidewalks serving this subdivision. • Bondiag is also required for the placement of street trees. The applicant has agreed to provide sanity • sewer to this development by constr. cting a new . .. e P y �, main that will connect to th eristing 8 inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW Durham Road. The applicant has agreed to coiled the storm Water' in a new underground system and connect to the existing storm sewer underground � �rsitern located in SW Durham Roads C nipliance With Corn oreh i sive Plan Policie tzerl Input. The subdivision is consistent with Policy °`b 1.1 because notice of the application and the public hearing on this item was provided Citizen FP � P � P the ed to the �tt�en Involvement Team CIT South and to owners of property within 250 feet of the site. The site has been posted with a sign which states that a development application is pending for this site. Water ! alit . To comply with Policy 42:1, the developer shall be required to construct an on -site water quality facility or pay fees in -lieu of their construction as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and surface water quality facilities s ' would i t�rder 1��. 9]. -47 Requiring .. •� surface small sites on s Ili . that q a maintenance burden to the City result in numerous facilities that would become �.., t Furthermore, the a licant has not proposed any su eh facilities there are no y - applicant � ties and they p p r'y s natural. de' cessions o r other areas of this site that are ° arttr,�lay l` suitable or 1iE ARl�i��' �D►p"FIC�R = SR.J� �d � .. Four "l�" �bnstcnctiu�n A' PAGE e to a h f • .. 1 3 • • ,.4 water quality facilities. Regional facilities„ funded by fees in-lieu of construction of these facilities, would provide the required treatment with improved reliability .nd less maintenance. Therefore, they applicant should be required to pay tEe fee in -iieu of constructing air on, -site facility e ab►biic- , 'e y: Policies 7.12, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 are satisfied because the developer is required to extend public sewer and water systems to this site prior to development. In addition, developer is required to provide for underground installation of utility lines. The applicants proposal, and the Engineering Department recommendations conforms with this policies. Fire k'rotection: Tualatin n ''alley Fire and Rescue was provided with a copy of the - development plan in compliance with Policy 7.6.1. The Comprehensive Plan states that numerous dead end streets throughout the Tigard area create access problems for Fire Protection. Because this subdivision has provided for a private driveway ' .kat connects to a Major Collector street, emergency vehicle access in the area will oe facilitated by the design of this subdivision. Street Iriioproyennents: The subdivision proposal complies with Policit; s 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposed extension of improvements to and within the development should contribute to a safe and efficient street system in this area Improvements to the private driveway, utilities, and the proposed removal of the existing driveway located southwest of the site within this prod eel subdivision will be consistent with City of Tigards standards. The area as previously h mentioned is substantially developed, and most street improvements rovementis such as right-of-way dedications, placement of street signs or signals are already existing in this area. The extent of the impact of this development will be minimal tc the area as a whole. VII CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION . N The Planning Division concludes - . . . .. Planning w .. es that the hearings Officer should find that the proposed lud subdivision, will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with hpplicable local state and federal laws: kIL 1NCS l• FILE -SUB 4- +OQ�?2 - Four M Constructione Co, r ? SO-Set recognition of the findings staff recommends APPRO`' Al B 94.0002 for Kreick Meadow subject the conditions w of suiirin .. folk. ro p ►s* L CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR, FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR ` RECORDING THE ; FINAL. NAT win ,< ' WASHINGTON COUNTY. VISES �iTHERWISE SPECIFIED, TIM STAFF CON CACT FOR ALL ' C0 ND CONDITIONS IS, i.. b l d IN TIIE ENGINEERING :IDEPARTMS,N °, 639-4171. A,: Sari 'sewer and storm drain plan and profile shall rovided in accordance with the tasty Public ,'T.mprovement Design Standards, dated February, ' 1994. Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted ` for preliminary review to the Engineerin Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets ' of approved drawings and one (1) itemize'd construction cost estimate, all prepared ` by a Professional Engineer, sh all be pp (.f plans j Al any � ii � to an submitted for din �� (NOTE: these �ans area rev�,ev�.and a row, :.. .:... g 9 by g y include sheets relevant drawings re u�r�ed b the �iv�sion aid should only to public impro!vement>. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing under ound system without significantly impacting properties downstream. A joint agreement shall be executed and recorded on City use and maintenance , standard forms for all common driveways, The agreement shall be referenced or and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT; John Hagman, Engineering Department (639- 4171). The aP. plictnt shall make an appointment for a pre- constructon meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of the public improvement plans bu# before starting work on the site. The applicant, the applicant's engineer, and contractor shall be required to to receiving attend this meeting prior iving t r � be approved plans and permits: Construction of the proposed public im -p ro..dw nts and issuance of Building Permits shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans, a street opening permit or HEART ' Clt�'i�'p': I S J �... moan k'oc�r D� seta loit�tx PAGE 10 • construetiam c©mpli ce agreethentsi en • eer.agre&nent and. pay nent'of .1, Pilot to the plat lbeing, recorded i�itb Stan C provide t performance b nd As alto rov� 'nerttS have have the plan resor,led after a .pabli gip; 44� , . 1 i f � yf . Tigard, tad.. has posted the appropr a +u fM n dcu�� ees as tin e mac' o1 on of a dl eve lope re app es . lie app a m n accepted t h li by ti n; tree 'removal pemit shall be sub fitted e es rose trees which are to .. be removed in 14onnection with the construattiv:a 'of public prbveme+ts. tree removal shall be applied for and approved by the pl .mmng Division pi-10r to removal of such trees o+ `- site. STAFF CONTA I Vector Aadonri,' lain ng Division g� Applicant shall. submit to the Planning Division .,evidence cif some form of screening and buffer from the neighbors properV to the east of the proposed private drivewayy . In addi ion; appl.icarit shall required to constrit a privacy fence before construction begms so - t�' at current home owners are afforded a measure of privacy. S TAFF CONTACI'. ht oA Ado Planning Division. ant shall submit plans to the Operation's Department showing location 10. The applicant p Pp of pu blic easement for the sanita ry sewer, ar�d and proposed Deed la � � installation n where the catch: basin line connects to the existing storm line, STAFF CONTACT: John Roy, Operations Deparirrint, I , shall submit - plans and comply the following requirements `Tualatin ,t Applicant p Valley Fire & Rescue District: A °'T' o Parkin " sign shall be installed on both sides of the proposed private o g street. Fire h._ drant is rm ,mired within 500 feet of all portiont of .a structure measured around ` liie outside of the stru ctur e and along tin .a. ro v. e access roadway, Fire hy drants locations will be co- appitoved wlth the Fire District and Tigard Water DepartmetSTAFF �tJl"1TA� .. STAFF t. ere Birchill, Tualatin Firs & Rescue District. 526�2502 ) kl lei G S f it F i C$lt : UB 9� -000x F'otir nsti-uction Co: E 1 Q .I ANT sti UIRED PRIOR 6111) P :, � it The a��; t sha .fl pr vide to the Direct° ` €or �ceview and approval a det e lands aPa* and street tree planting , p►la�n�s. ' ' The it idseaping . plan, '; a,I shoo provision for the required 20% landscape coverage, and the . street tree pla�atin an shall show., provision for at least four (4) street es' along tie frontage SW Durham Ro 1N ADDITION THE APPLICANT , SHOULD BE A SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EXCLUWE LIST. SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Ag'eemei t Before City approval i ' ��e appro "tY � p gal is certified d �n the final plat, d ' bef construction plans are issued by the City, the Subdivider shail: Execute arid file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and Include in the agreement provisions thct if st eh wet S not completed within the period specified; ae City may complete the work and recover the i'a11 cost and expenses from the subdMvidea A surety bond execute4 by a surety company authorized to transact business in the St* of C)rego'h which rem4tiz in forcp, until the sul,,ety company is woe:Lied by the City in *riling that it may be The subdivide; shall furniSh to the City Engineer an itemize a 11111Pkovernetit estimate, ' t,,rtified by a registere47t4 civil engineer, to assist'the'sCty Engineer in calculating the Ednotint of the perfciimance assurance. „ . . The subdivider shall not cause terihinatit:ori of nor allow 4o)tpiration of said guarantee without having first secured written o-,tithorkeatiOii from 'the city,, r• ' , . .. , • • • , ••■■ • • SECTION 18.160.190 Filing and Recording A Within 60 days of the City review and apptrit•vil, the al)plicarit shai submit 1,9 the final plat to the County for signatures of County officials as required by ORS Chapter 92 I. Upon final fecordii,g with the County, the applicant shall submit to the City a rro,/lar copy of the recorded final plat. NEA11111■TOS OFFICEA - SUB 94-0002 - our onstiiictlion Co. I et A I 'ad lit i °:.ones , i�aclbding, but no 1. ted to those ° required t�+r electric, ct mmunicatiop,` �g�a .tang and c television services rely e I fa ..� 1 t�litic� sha�� ;,�` played dergrad; �,x�eot, for sur,ace rr mounted transformers, surface momtted connection boxes and meter cab is which may ° be placed above ground: .0 • service facilities during construction, him. 'cap c y electric lines operating at 501)0 volts or abo'e. All improvements installed by the subdivider shall be guaranteed vas to workmanship and material for a period of one ye= o volf acceptance by the Ci tyd ; Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit, on in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by `kei; Engineer, The Cash or bond shall corn ply with the terms and of Section 18.160.180. 18.164.150 Installatioh: Prere l i site/Pe g , it F e NO land division improvements, including sa iitary se re'rs., storm sewers, stref •ts, sidevt alks. curbs, lighting, or other req ire ent` shall be undertake ► e cept ati r the pans therefc'r hav °been ro ve, by the City, . permit fee paid and permit issued. s ti . not begin until the City has been no ied' in `'advan+t =E e��,re�o `�St1 hot b r tease �� ball d fa %f �ora�rl�,,As dascotit�nt�C any �, the City is not ed 18.1f4.200 ' Engineer's Cert•'t1cation Required The land divider's engineer shy pr ovide ligritten certification of form provided by the City that all 'improvements,, workmanship and m aerials are in accord with ' =rent and itend °d engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, p for the City acceptance of the subdivision's i provetnents of any portion thereof a't operation and maintenance. I DMSIB N APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID ONLY IF TI44 ` FINS PLA C` IS RECORDAD WITHIN A . OF THIS DECISION PREPARED BY. Victor Adon, DATE Assistant Planner APPROVED BY' Richard ersdortf, sJ 1N S. 1FF � Fc = f 9a =�UQCD Fouxr,"D" r":ttttst 40t.ioo Cott IEORGE K SICK 9185 SW DURHAM Rid TIGARD OR 97224 54� ,TIELD ; CIVIC 10650�'e' . f4UMi` R ' ELD 97 224 • JEANE1.1,11E & ARTHUR DEFER' 15880 SW OAK MEADOW LI TIGARD OR 97224 m34 \iM" .WThI'.Y 15890 SW OAK MEADOW LN TIGARD OR 972247 PEU`N SIEGELL 14811 KRUSE OAK BLVD LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 JIM ROMAN 11250 SW 82ND AVE TIGARD OR 97224 DOUG BALISLLIH 15850 ,SW OAK MEADOW Lb' TIGARD 0t , 97224 BEVEIRIN SWINK BU "IE,D CIVIC ASSOC 10650 SW SUMMERFTELD DR TIGARD OR 97224 NEIL JEREM: A i 15400 SW ALDERBROOK DR TIGARb OR 97224 Da ► l anti ;�..',` ;Y-94 hearing Officer City of Tigard Tigard, Or 97223 Attn.: Victor Adonri, Staff, Manner ! :S,`►�+d. Sumn erriOld Drivel r; Ord, Oregon 97224 20-013 1' ECEIVED. APR Neither the Summersfe:td Liaison Committee nor the Summerfield ivic Association was informed of the hearing held` a week ago 4 proposed development by Four ; D Construction Company of a site between Durham Road and oak Meadow Drive i ri Summerfield. This is most irregular. Our liaison committee has 'worked closely with the city on land -Use matters adjacent to ,%.end af° fect ang Summerfield, such as the Triad development, for many Years, r•n the city's failure td i City ofTgalyd l' O Box 23307 Tigard, OR 9:+ RE: Pour D Construction Company and George Kreid' �� I�cui" � that the It has come to the attention of the Board of Directors of the Summerfield Cavi' Association t Cianstruction Company is not following through ott its assurances that they would build a six foot privacy fence between the lots it is developing i d. 0 on anti Road and aesa�� of �una�nre�rfie Representatives of the Sumnuerfieid Civic Association attended a meeting held by the Four D Constnit tion Company frt. sturounding for residents of the develops nt. At &le meeting, they Were assured that there would be no problem t build ai ix foot fen between the development awl the Summerfield residence:. Now we learn from our reeideots that Four r D Consiontloo Co mpan y does mot wish to follow-through on building the six foot privaeY fence. between 109th and Viable, is following through' on his corm tznents to build u The .4er�el erg f the Law � , .. � . ,, in no �1'a obstructs the vision six .... S!X ��00$'p21VaC fl�� ...: w.. e The sot foot fence requested at the dew on �u , obstruction : Chic Odic Meadow !.an for any car entering Durham Road from the development. 'H �� 1'he $ur u .. . . Meadow Lane rues parallel db the project with no street � � ,�r�acfi as foii¢�vAin - tku`o� on their' sear' b�� of D�irec�`cors feel very si rongiy g Four D Cr� y ,...� Maui; the given to its r�,�,�deoit� ly six foot privacy fence and that t City should also be � e1° `bent any sasu� giv' which i does net wa nt t l �epg developer 'Wblcbl the developer then decides that bid oiler tinceaeiy, T.bgaa�d Cay Nay! ;' 3125 SW 1fatt 13tvd. T; , Otego t 91?24 E: SUB 94-0002 I wautd ate to enters .t11t 0-004e11/6 06 lLe ad/ace-Pt piopvut y, ;oc Wend . rid the. So€ mie .6.d e.Cd Pho jest. t1 .gh, SahooL 400t 46:c .thh,oagh, t phtva e pxopeiuty hays been a it m ew u6 e hay► - r,..,�. hbo�%haod. �'. em �z� Dori ��,�. cl,�v . be��e �1ie pC ho beep they (togi, Voit.ham /toad ana .it eic.tevtd4 about 1/3 .o6 the 44e. o6 the tot. They at 6o eitteA 6iwora Oak Meadow Late t oagh' the. ,o inubti< and b4 he The develop9Jt p...).40.4 to add (4.4 adcat ona.. cllr iveway ythat. t '• , ei%te.r d 1/2 of the way at.on.g the .o o■s.i t4 11 do o the, W. He Witt be adding . • g with no attempt, act a 4 oLo.a.On. A �y}top ienee a�.d.�n r►rohe. ac.Cedb wo eWd ` A oLve. the whew. .the, hewng the ceV¢.Co pe. k 604 the. tueiir ., nSh 6enc /4 ovet .3 Seer .tat ate a %twat toui haZaUd L The. tity A ted .tit at Jules onty c p t.Led to 6hon t ,yard 6eneeo e the gad going h tre two 6 f oot 6ertce6 on the iiJo nit o6 .theiac development With v A t td.Z kalptataite4a extendiciig (Leong Vun,ham Road tah.¢. h 4:4 a hi. P, y .tJuwetal h te,e. rub.t ete 4:obb rho T:Lgavud FO.Lgh Sehoo... The Fence We cote Aa a tin. in. the. bac the con ,wren. o c t 4.c t 12 ee-t back (horn � b '` .6.01.eet Meaddw tufach .L6 a veh tow a .6 ee�t -r„ elLe Would y �� o be attte d% no ur,dr�iadr impaiAment &,tong the At/Eta., vzsAute.inipaimntAt.iitVOtafte tht two drr i y 4�e a a ge ee and -two tow Ito . .. : aaze�a at, J V ewa. as �the�.e the e4ge6 66 the clitivetuay 001.e. 15 rJace4 aipaa enee wouit.d not e.onatitute. at hazaawde By pow,t. expeaac, ,e. we. know that 6/toot wade, bri. ome the, 6ha p.Gace o the owneh th.e. back yastd6 jubx happen. I have attar , ted' the. :a.ltid bd1 qa /Lot ode, .40A44 4u4gge6tt .olri4 ., .thaa ' a e waif Otti majo nlatc t;;aiaitce,. e. a uae ' t~��,n ti j a • �.�uz ee r� .�h � va...e` 0� �h¢ p�d9�. t�n.�. �at�h'.bid/41,.;41aZ own� a ua cidwene ,a : fitted . t .e.�e 'wou.Cil be. KO iteed 6o't, �, -,net. i. ghb014 • th;46 et tut' , �/ 7 n / ■I- 4 .�'wr•'n S N ` sF :. mctd. t g.Lue. U 4ome. ptatect40he A po Oek es^ :duo Moh o SoMMaili d .4 4atUtOU ed : ne ;off the trtct�n ter, ma a a he 0teie nd i � T he h . of :the e: , n.o jeat wo be. {+maheted and' 47e be.a• tq, '0404 , t�`tit ''pe- e. ` tip Gwiou)d be 4.e,.8peete..da ! it Thete 1. bottle gtte4t2on 04 the ,r)oed £ai he dometop�t. owners b anal a So►mne .LeLd n rt¢a6e of :vie, Mew wit it citvdoptot :game. & Lom the. meae.. 'rig ranc h athe fie, n 4-V Coltatiateztort toido�4toad the '16.1tobte.01 040 c or a- be d` a prop . 401k a.6 deAd,V,,bed 1t. r tatot to the ,tio the ad a.c. p /Lo p€a'r t: Mang d t d . o of ' ctittevd the. Cis -y Ittaithig £ems a a 4114;t ct h WLa u . At the. 'C.aci 1n z;t2ng t. de veLop it e ed agaa, td�> . it p easy fie. te... A petope.'L (epee t ou.Ltt, add to the. vatat o .a h o iit new hont0.a a0004 be oe..olterl, el Lcke,tt would have a. 444e p li patiddj lootle.d 'be, enhzitc•edo ` tats PLANNIN V� k APR 04 19 April 4, 1994 o: t1r.Victor. Adonr i from: Mr. Pfe1 Jeremiah, Yp, Suromerfieid .c14.1c Association SrAb,,j ect: 3CAT1 OH 9185 purham Rand(ACTti 25 0 0 0 DO, tax lot ?4O0) 0 . t3.r� January, 31, 0 9 3 I attended a !fleeting at the itrvftatiora ai irlr, Dale . De iorpport, President of Four O Construction Co. to learn about their p'ia.0 to develop 4 huiiding lots adjacent to property owned by some §vmrmerfiNti residents. At this meeting some of the residents expressed several, Concerns about ih® project. )) t de With feuding the property and ec�fio concerns had to, to your aa�f�ice a� February tree removal,,,, this regard a letter was s y u . other matters were called .. 1994 b ,the homeowners in which these grad to ,your 2 , Y ur" ottonticara In addition to this, the reemans also seal, a letter to the `. developer as f follow up to the January 31 st meetinga 2. concerns o��presse�d in both letters were (drought up of the Meeting and Ttee e I left with a belief that p®l6arpp ort was most milling to fence his prop arty and would either remtve or leave trees depending on each neighbor's desire. 3 that formal hearing was just today 8 'egr°lt��i that a � . laeir! en March 904 at Which time the Four D Co. arras applying for a permit to develop this advised of the hearing, I was.. he the property, being o " unable to attend .the. informed that t. rrMdeting. � Whether this s true or not, a Co been .. i I have anything Or. ` . P property � , , .. to - t � ra i n r ■as let to may ho; able to develop the pr" operty without having to do Deflorpport indicated the *maid do at the January no o g �, p. the fence and the trees: that 00 Co. were advised in wr ug about - � �.�t,�tru�t��r� 4, ! a that your office. and F'uur .. this ,� .. potion lthotr# protect ng this matter it _is hard.. {�" . owners. �.�d...ef�t�fl ,.this tllid to Taal ens a the interests of the affected ad . , that we str�rn l ob`ect to t�e Issuance �acent pr aso be advised l net happen. If so, pie .� fD a �' of a permit to the l=our , Cor'istruction Co. to develop t0tis property pnlcss �. . - an rr��Proava�d (time and hodnar the re�gaaes the Company is . ".._ .. provide the .. s ti oqu i red to prow e of adjoining property owners to either remove or retain, the trees on their property: Ehclos firer Letrr t7 the Freeman's Four D Construction Co. Letter to the Planning frdam the Freereans Letter. to For I Construction CO. from she f= reeinahs far . and L76i,s. lyreema Bryon uc t ki, Company is pulthasi roped l . t6+ u , t,. iptlot�''is 2S1 =11DC Tags Lot 140.x1 OL r p a ` s to;div'ide rc ne.:,• buit lu '1 't t4st y ill by l0 .tcd' nort of the'e:a 1i lxc� hie' city of Tigard ,off ♦ the ►e', ssa peen it 31 woo d . M s elikee tfo . di ro etail: th the s �r1 oOncding propet awuea and rsidntsYuare invit e eetng ott: I r please note this will be an information meeting on pr :liz na altered prior to the subrnittal °u the application to t az'. I Io 4 forward to more specifically diseussing the 09'.45 if you have any questions. Sincerely, you plan to construct a ; fend do not have dais n.your plan tsar icecommendation woul foot fence 4 fists not .t Posts to be tre iced and set in pr+ pert � i Iry you quest that yot inclu center oast holes, back filled with 2 inch minus gravel Not . Set ; + of crete. Fence boards to be 2nd grade or better cedar. Fence to be stalled prior to A , Z !Y construction. Fence boar „ a bl nailed horizontal. rails What for the existing trees along the 3. ha� is your pia a or � boundaiy► line? What d position is to be made of two !story home?. e Where and what kind of street access is �� planned • ow close (in feet) will the proposed structures be from existing Suninierfield homes? Attach, : * ortstritctson eayel•tort Oregon, 97075 one 6414915 response he Qnse proPert located proper te't January i letter to Yd3/11. y a is Is in .ttuctici on to the !alined c°Ihners adjacent, p),Ans„ \.k ty owners building oPPil .0 your rested I • 1. What •••••••.• •.• " •• -.• ••,• ••••• ..•••••. •• •••• • ,.• .• •••• • ••... • , • •-• • -• •• •-• • ••• •• - • • • • ••••• • • • . • • • - • • •• .• • Do you plan to 'construct a renee, around the property? If do not 'haVe';:this in your i),4att; now, we request that you inrhide one. Our iecO;timeiiiatioli' would be as follows: foot ferce 4 x 4 , posts not to exceed foot on center c Posts to be reatcd and d with 2 Not $etlit • ' • . • • • . . • , , • • , Fella boards- to be 2nd grade e. Fence to be installed :010ot:to.' 4141 f. Pene boards to be nailed on horizontal No • . • • ;. „. , .• • ..,,,,... ; What is your plan • for the aiotlig. the property hundary What to be of., the 'exist4itt,,,, , •,, two story hoine?.. , , • _ , • • • '..• 4. Where and what kind of street access is planued7. Row close (in feet) w the proposed lltructures be fro Ail the existing Summerlield hies? „ Siccrely I 1 1 A w Y• February 23 19Q4 Planning Commission Tigard City Council 13125 $ W Hall bivd. Tigard, OR. 97224 Gentlemen: ►n Janu r y 31st we attended a meeting with the Pour D Construction Company regarding plans for a residential devol'.opmnent adjoining our homes in Sumrclerlield. Copies of their letter and our response are attached. We appreciated the opportunity to meet with the representatives of the Four' D Construction Company to the P � rrior P � commencement of the work; but frankly we were disa pp ointe,1 with the vague information presented at this meeting. We are concerned because the properly to be developed will not be under the conditions and restrictions of the Summer& Id Civic ', ►ssociatiot,\ '(SCA)., Therefore, there will be no . the use of the adjoining p as far as land'ca, in m property F �, sintena�ce, o control over , , . . animal and noise control and other restrictions that we are required to follow. This letter is . ` to �orta1wa 1 �� our concerns directly with the h'1n�n.�i�n� Commission. We believe there are a number of questions and concerns that Were not adequately addressed. Furthermore, we believe that the Four D Construction representatives were, unnecessarily vague regarding the specifics of the development} plans: In addition to the RYA attached letter), a questions presented to Four D Construction on �, any (set, . � Ianu 31, 1994 s�,� request the Commission pay particularly attention to � e folio i we would uest thato matters I. Review all development plans, b wring that all required set backs, drainage and general tonkkg requirements are net by the developer. 2: Insure that the homing density ,ro os�(d by the contractor is within " � p � accepted city guidelines. We believe three (') homes be built, but are unsure of the status of the older residence =entity located On site. ao 5, . .. _ h er construct a privacy ferret before construction We requested theft the developer .. �� . , .. ce befo b home owners ....., measure of privacy, _ The gins so that the current � ners area afforded a � ... .. . vac :W developer was vague legard ga this request (see recommended fence specifications -. avtach meat # 1), 4: We are also concerned that tho construction of the houses will block ott ' BEFC)RE TnE FOt1H 1 CITY OP gePrding an application by Four tonstructIorL Company for :4, subdivision consisting arplino5dnIate 0446 acres located at 9185 SW Durham SVIVIIVIAltit oi' E1 .,$lif;division Stri3 940002 The applicant requests Subdivision approval to clivide parcal consisting of appro2dmately 0.65 acres into four lots rariging in 's from 5,070 tquare feet to 6,824 square feet. I I ' ' ,'•' ' 0 0, • ,ryl I 1, Four ID" Con.strudion OWNER: George Xrcick P.O Box 1577 9185 SW Durham Rd. Beavertoii, OR 97075 'tigaid, OR 97224 COMPREPIENSIVE PLAN DESiGNATION: Low ts)ensity Residential, ZON11NG DESIONA'TION: R-7 (ResidentW, 7 units per acre) LOCATION: 9185 SW Durham Road (WCFM 281 11DC, tax lot l'4e)) , APPLICABLE LAW: Community Dewlopment (*'ode Chapters 1832.050, 18.88, 153.92, 18.'1).00, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 18,160 and 18,164. Coniptehensive Pio Policies 4.2.19 712 7.3.1 74' 811 and 811 ' • _11 , „., , ',4a . ',, h4 �•`:r 4.,� � ,. �i .. /, ��., .3" 1� �e sat),.i located on the'no'rth � rf i1 Ia Ra �1, au soy eadaw e, adjacent mime ieid. iicwei ►pthent. EXIMILIVIMalaginWIL . u tln ,'snot a family residet cb� T is e :srtl�ect parcel � �s developed nth an g � , existing residence `Fill be re sine , jThere are a fe ev x r eri tree oc tea o ' g and v s assrd'' �orer`ts :loa�at� tie 4,,anthern �provea`ty l aa. a e for of the site a�'i the ant 'ropertiell� to the north and west o site owe ;tohe•d for sh g o f y.;teside�a�ti` 1 � y y a. •w j) 1 1 d ul develcpmeut at a density ,of dts e'er :acre, and are 1argel " k eloped.. Properties to the south are zoned R-4, tl esidential, 4 units per acre) zoned R ? Re► identia , 7 omit~ per acre), ata, attie pto�e��s t��►� the east are � � ,,. properties to the east are zoned R -4. (.:;Sioential, 4.5 tinits per acre ) hale area is shbst • iy developed, Tigard H,„ Sclioial'is• located inedatelycsooth.: of the proposed development. a r1 111■w►.w III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STM : L rid .dst Section 1 &52 • contains standards for the I�, -7 zr ne, • • ingi tri y detached residential units are a permitted u se in the zones and mhs L l with the follo dita►.ensio Nitinimum lot size average lot width Iront setback Garage setback Interior sideyard setoac c Corner 3deyrd setback Rear setback Maximum building height square feet /unit 15 feet zo tew6 5 feet 10 feet 15 feet. 35 feet A r . �: SP-Am 18.88.©4a 1' l c : �' %�, �� (�() contains solar access standards for new residential dewe1 t; A lot meets the basic solar access lot Standard if it has a north -south d .. A. of 90 feet or more and has a front lot line that is oriented w ith!n ,3a & grees of a true east -west axis. A sub vision complies ' d with the basic rec►uireme.ati if 80 �o or more of the newly { � ' v ere?�ted lots meet or exceed ,s This standard. ,. : Section 18,92.:020 sity, The number Of r section :.. ,, contains standards for density, . . : , ... ..... dwelling units permitted �s based on the net development are*. excluding sensitive land areas and land dedlicated for public roads or parks, or for pr ;vate roadways: This land area is then divided by the minimum parcel size p s tied by the zoning district to determine the number of lots which may ,be created on a site. d= i contains laandscapin ` .: � standards for new developnaent. n scaoiu�.�° Section �8:1Qta c The d7 zoning district requires a minimum 20% landscape coverage for this site. The applicant must comply with these requirements. The applicant most, also comply with the standards set forth in Se ion 15 :100:035 , which details the requirements for street trees in a residential subdt„ 'Amu The re th �1 states requirements d a7d�7Tdi • ��as' rr,c��ait altt�Lt9�s7,., l development projects fronting on a ublic, . that al p _private $treetn ; or' �, private a driveway MOM than 100 feet in length shall be required to pl ;,�'lt street trees. H ` NGS OFFICER - SUB 94-0002 m Four e4strtactlon Coo ;1 r e Accrem„,firgia,Simgatirg, Section 18. „ 0 contains siiAdar si`for singl femily residential vebictilar access, Private drives may provide 'access for a maximum of six iaidences. A common private aCteSsvisiay4liteli serves between three to six residences must be a minimum of 30 feet wide with a minimum pavement width of at least 24 feet, curbs and a walkway. ItgLEtt..avAII Section 18.150.020(E) requfres a pnnit for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inchos or more in diameter oi.asured four feet above the ground on undeveloped residential land. A permit for tree removal must,cOmply with the following criteria a5 specified in Section 18.1.50.030(A)1 The trees are diseased,' present a danger to iiieperty„ Or.intetere with utility service or traffic safety; The trees have to be .removed to construct proposed improvements I or to otherwise atilizt the applicant's property in a reasonable itaimer; The trees are not needed to prevent erosi()tio in5tability, or drain-""e problems; 0 streets and.,ro of subdioisions alid approved for adj oi' ng in all Other :respe interest to modify t t so as to conform ;`to; the p1 Partitlo or subdivisions rea as to � dt , ener efr attes 1t` is in tie` : ,;itern and; utilities serving a subdivision: Section 18.164.030(A development to be classification of the street,. Section 1,8,164.050(E) requires a loc street to foot ri ght-of-way -toot paved section sidewalks. Section 18 ►4.t1 times the lot ►i frontage' on public or pr hih is lot d pt 'from ` ei g roore than and requires that lots t acre 'at fee; ►rivate streets, otter t n ail., HEAR/ blGS OFFICE 9 .000 .`out izeta_hand; Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure 0. at citizens provided an opportunity to Iparticipate in all phases of the planning and development review process, AlitieLQuality: Policy 42,1 provides that all development within the Tigard urban planning area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quaiity standards. bIllia„Ufffiel: Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 provides that the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, ai'd storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and that utilities shall be placed underground. Fire PrpiLpe:ti n: Policy 7.6.1 states that Fire District shall review all new development applications to ensure adequate Fire l'rotection is available to Serve each new development. ats: Policy 8.1.1 provides that the City will plan for a safe and efficient street wad roadway system that meets tOrrent needs and anticipated future growth and development. Jet Ircipr v P&icy 8.1.3 states that the City will require the foll(i),Mgag as a precondition of approval: Development abut a dedicated street or have other adequate accesS; '1111e devfl(iper shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs, and sidt,malics to City staridtards within the deviOromerit. • a } fie. dewekc+ r sllait a< w c patt in e inp ' e na nt ;% f . oostin stn_ e ir74sy and sinew to tkhe e ' pt o «' opmentrs im Street Improvedke ts' -o »tads acid st reet, jt s, or sigmia is $ a' %aeM tA;,ti provided when t a devt'1O pment', is' pound to ,create or !,ifjr` a a rd. OTHER 'STAB COMMIE e City of Tigard Eng!:nreehi ePartment has previewed e propusall and offe the following emtuneff s The project will take access from proposed private driivewidy caaiaecti�g to S�V Durham Road. SW Durham Road is classified as a Major Collector on the Comprehensive ;',flan, and has been dedicated and improve l to the ultimate v4dth No additional street construction is required with the exception of the removal of the existing driveway that selves the existing residence. The ,litiveway for the existing house will be re- routed to • P �:1lii servo �� four private access the � neW rlv� that proposed o sed Yotg inch applicant proposes to construct a new main that will eo�oect to .... � the existing The a , 8 inch, public sanitary sc Wer line that is located behind the curb in SW Durban, Road. The existing line has the capacity to serve this development. ' Stor;U, r+n The applicant proposes to collect the story 'water in a new underground sys ¢n and connect to be existing storm sewer system located in SW Durham Roads applicant should verify that the existing systeni has the :capaci o sent development. The Unified Sewerage A on y has establishe a '' � $ ° cy d and the -as agreed to'e7 (Resolution and Order Noy 91.47) Surface Water Matiagetnent Re t requirin g the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees a M -lx e, c HEARINGS . onr " '' Const ctlon CHEARINGS OFFICER SUB 9� 1100► �" Force atiod tl +sir on. Requiring stilts* numerous fclitie g that ,would Furthirmore, he al:00cent has 13* proposed an natural depressions or 'other areas site 'water quality facilities. Itogional facilities, funde of these facilities, would provide the require and less Maintenance. Therefore ths applicant s o Of constructing an on-site facility. small SI,es w ur&n to such ties and there are no , , l■ , • bile for ' at are particularly etnivet vi"iintl:utiroverl reliability lieu a construction I be requiied to pay the fee The City of Tigard Operations DepaMnent has roviewetri the proposal and offers the, foilovifirag conlittents: The proposed site plan does not shOw a public easement for the waits sewer. There needs to be a manhole installed where the catch basin line connects to existiyag storm line. Property fronting SW Durham Road should maintain, that prticsri of landscape on that trontage„ The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and offers the following comments: The existing residence shtll connect to sewer if not already connected., All aziotAcerttrated storm water shall be dvaiiii-ed to the private drive. V. cn" $z AGENCY COMMENIF'S • The facilitztc)r for the South Citizen Involvement Team, was notified of the proposed subdivision. The Involvettlertt Team has not provided any ornments or objections to this development. In addition, apjlicant concluded a nd hborhood meeting. The Stlinnierfielci Civic Association has reviewed the proposal anri following comments: Review all development plans, 'insuiting, that all 1\1c/direct setbaelcs, drainage,, and general zoning requirements are Met by the deV, 11FNGS OFFICgit, 5113 94autfu2 For .";)'‘i Construction Co 1AGE 8 I ' ewo e to an what cot enants$ a an s this` development.. For ,example restriction f or k1eliites re iatin V ey Fire fescue bit er 'h s e iewed a ,pro an of£err e fo owing comments: be inst ed on Fire hydrant is required withi feet of; e io Uf a; measured around the outside of th t � e ads o � pp roved access roade!taY. dire hydrants locations 1 be co- approved with the .Fire Tigard Water Department, o other co lfiien s was received by the Plannin � N . Develoument: `The proposed subdivision complies with'the use standards of the R -7 zoning district (Code Section 1!.) lLacaus r the lots are intended to be used for single family detached dwelling u ts; Single family residences are listed as, a permitted use in this zone. The proposed four (4) lots, .wh? eh range in size between' 5,0(70 and 6,824 square feet, are all either equal to or larger than the minimum requirement of the .R -7 zone of 5,000 square feet. As shown on the preliminary site plays, the r x ;sting residence on lot #1., which is to proposed ne retained meets all setback requirements of the iz -7 zoriea All proposed lots shall be subject to the setback 6tandards' of the R -7 zone. Complian ee with these standarrrs will be reviewed as part of the building permit gP application process for residential structures. Sa►l Access: Lot #4 meat the basic solar access requirements as specified in Code Section 18& 804 ►. The front lot line orientation of this lot is within 30 degrees of true east - west. This lot also provides a minimum north - south '� dimension of at least 90 feet. Of the P P e ro 05`:vi four lots, one lot (lot #'Y) ,may be counted as the standard 20% exemption from these solar access standards. The in ( ) g q ... remaining lots lots 2 and 3 are constrained . meeting the base ,. . nstra�ed from re uirecnents due to the placement of the proposed private driveway and the configuration of pe Section � i'+ . To require strict corn "�liance with the lots as per �e2ct3 ®i1i �� {�,�1�� P these standards would reduce the overall density on this site. These lots should be exempted foicm the solar access requirements. nts. Thexefore this Code standards have been satisfied: Deem* The net developable area of the site, after deduction of the public right- of -way is approximately 23,331 square feet. The gross r area is approxi rnately 28,314 square feet. With a minimu of 5,000 s q uare f eet per lob, this site yields an opportunity for four (4) dwtllin. g Wits under the R=1 zoning designation (specifically, 4.6 lots). The four (4) proposed lots are within the density range, provided by t... . ro�ided b the Comprehensive Plan and the Development bode for the site. The applicant has proposed the ,creation of four (4) lots and thereby complies with this standard; H AKIN S 1FFIC -.Ml� - SUB 94b Four' " " Constrijction Co+ PAGE 10' ,l+ ga g: t ►pplgcant sites beregu red to Plant Street the standards set `forth in ;Section 18,100 0 In d zoning 1 to 40 feet apart site fronts on or approximately 112 feet Therefore, suet tree cc vvrage is read for properties s in the requires that street trees be spaced betwc size classification of the tree at m ,fruity, 1C ees in accordance wi b -tie 4Na 20% iandstap e fade further pandst aping and street tree plans wad, not submitted try. the app cant w ' "herefore, the applicant will be required'' to submit to the Plannira g vision a detailed landscaping. plan /lowing ng provision for the required 29 % landscape . coverage, and a street tree plan 'Ong plan. epee rea ti'e Ong on the 'ham R'oad detail.ed . for review, . lem 'Ile Planning and B nxld;Division kivili review each building and o eti related permits' for compliance with setback standards set forth for structures • visual cle trance area for all street Within � . . tierce . . the clean vision area. A intersections shell be that triangular area 30 • feet from the intersection of the right�pf -way. Placement of any future possible obstructions iincludLii street trees aria sign p y .. indard. Proposed subdivision identification si shall c�tn 1 with this sl placement of sign and street trees shall by reviewed by the Planning Divisk n for compliance with the re rements of Sections 1a p with � 18.102 (Vision clearance) and 18.114 (Signs). r ?F .. »rcu a +o�. t Section 18.10 • and See ��; ��. �� ton 18z 164.oddl(B) (tot Frontage) are satisfied. All lots are provided with at least 25 feet of either public or private roadway frontage as required by Section 18.164 The four (4) proposed lots are to be seed by a private roadway heading northward from SW Durham Road. This proposal h,olzplics with the access provisions required by Section 18.108. Therefore, these code standards have been satisfied `Free Re aal<ovall: Section 18.150 requires number trees over six inches • that a rid cr of in diameter that will be removed during construction be .xni named. The proposed construction of streets utilitie . , ;� � and; ireso ��e's as w�sll as �reld�:ted �:ra'= ., e; ... d A detailed y p �r require the i�etnovi� of trees on tl�e� situ ilea tree suttee, tae. was xdosubmitted as part of this application. Prior to the issuance ot a tree removal permit, the applicant shall specify the trees being requested for iienovaa as they relate to a) public improvements b) individual lot preparatdoii. MAKINGS S O FJ!ICER S 94. 2 a Four: toriiStirttetitill Coo It ivisfonf'.,, Section subdivision proposals Tie suf following reasons: �. ; Cho proposed sei divisio t' comp ies; with the . f mprehensive " a ' 'i lbw Inc usl� y esidential opportunity for the site as Nye , the re e :v� cies ations: of th k -i zone, ath the eppl�.le h ° l� l ether applicable ordinances and regulations; to proposed nar a of the subdivision, higreick . Meadow"0 is not duplicative o a y other plat recorded in Washington 'he creation of a private driveway connecting to SW Durham Road which is classified as a MAjor : Collector, and has been dedicated ,td improved to the ultimate',41dtici provide for both adequate and she access to lots in this p ro posed Subdivision. hi L, a, development :.. . , . . has no direct impact; on existing access s. to the area i ,substantiali + developed. The applicant cant has provided an explanation for all common improvements including the provision for public services such as sewer, water, drainage and street improvements. The 1pplicant has roe osed to constv?!� that connect existing proposed t a new main public sewer line in the area, connect to existing 6" water line located i n SW Oak Meadow Lane, and to collect the storm water in a new proposed underground system, 1' o additional street improvement is required at this tim r • . p es standards for street and p.. het and �C,Tttlity rn r�m� Chapter 18.164 _ `1S X64 rdgnd utility improvements. The desi gn of this subdivision is eansi st e n t with the se requirements due to the following The applicant will not be-required to dedicate 7iilditional r ht of- way to the public ilong SW Dialiain franta „ ,As stated in the Engineering e p . aen is findings on streets SW Durham; Road g which is classified as Major Collector Street, hOs been dtdicgited aid improved to the ultirelate width. No additional dedication and /or improvement iS required fo & this deveiopmeli E. N+ S OFFICER = sU 9440002 p Four �'1 Ci��strue$it`an o. • e atpplikantdid not propose the creation of any kcal streets. ` e proposed lots are to be served a pxi.nte driveway connecting to SW Dwhah Road: "Therefore, this requirement is not applicable to this developmen The proposed lots are each less than the 2.3 to 1 maximum lot depth -to -width ratio. Each lot will abut upon a street other than ah alley for a width of at least 25 feet. The appl cant has agreed to bond for and ',construct all nec ss y sidewalks serving this subdivision. Bonding is also required for the placement of street trees. The applicant has agreed to provide sanitary sewer to this developmeit by constructing a new main tL;'t will connect to the existing g ° p .,. located in SW Durham ' tm 8 �n��h public saint sewer line logy, l oait - ghe d l , in a new, The applicant his a �, p� to collect the stogy m water underground system stem and conliect to the existing storm sewer system located in SW Durham Road: Lcopl.iance l'M ripa'ehen..1'.o ,'i z en i '1 he subdivision is consistent with Policy 2.1.1 because notice of the application and the public hearing on this item was prow tied to the Citihen Involvement Team CTT South and to owners _ of property within 250 feet ' of tl,. site. The site has been posted with a sign which states that a development appli ation' is pending for this site: w CDua Uli To � o comply with Policy 4x2.1; the developer shall, be required to construct an on -st..i water quality facility i �. ... . ". q ty c�hty or pay fees in- iet� ,; � ,� they eonstruetiori s established under the guidelines of U ified Sewerage Agency Res olution a Requiting r quality : ... C ►e�cSe. NO. 914 7. Re , nir�n surface: water uali facilities on small sites would result in numer ous facilities that'vou id become a nain teiance btf(rden to the ci�r. Furthermore the applicant has not proposed a n y such facilities and there aro r c natural de p "r eslians or other areas of this Gite that are particularly suitable for HEARINGS OFFICER n e . �Cofstrii►ction Co : PAGE � SUB �► 2 Four • k1 I Z� water quality facilities. Regional f icil'ties, ;funded by fees in -lieu of r onstruction of these facilities, would provide the required treatment with improved reliwbility and less maintenance. Therefore, the applicant sho aid be required to pay the fee. in-lieu of constructing an on -site facility. Pack .ta 1. and 7.4.4 are sati5f!ed because the developer is required to extend public sewer and water systems; to this site prior to development. In addition, developer is required to provide for underground installation of utility `ty es. The applicants proposal, an d the Engineering Department recommendations enlatio�s conf�rms �th •..,., , t� p�'nc��s• Fkc Pro1egtio n :. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was provided . � y � with a copy of the �y p plan p. Policy Comprehensive states develo a�Ant in compliance with i'oh 'i.6.1. The horn rehensive Plan g that numerous dead end streets throughout the '�i and area create access problems for hire Protection. Because this subdivision ha3 provided for a private driveway that connects to a Major Collector street, emergency vehicle access in the area will be facilitated by the design of tr. s subdivision: Street Im rot's a :. The subdivision proposal complies whhh Policies 8.1 ,1 and e the proposed extension o improvements to and within the 818 becaos a safe and efficient street system in this area. development should contribute to m._„ -rzi Improvements to the private driveway, utilities, and the : roposed .remora., . of the , g driveway posed ubdivision will this �r existing drivewa located southwest of the site within t� 1 . � mentioned �f sl loran . g star The � be consistent with City of 7C� ards s ds. area as previously .. Y p improvements such as right-of-way is substantially developed, and most. street ' • i already existing in this area, dedications, placement +� . P a�� f street. or �� signals �.rre alread ex� The extent of the ^m, act of this . development will be minimal to the area as a The p p whole. VII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ►nin IDarrusio�r concludes that the Headings Officer ;Thou. that propose' ., should fa : The Pla �d t a the rop subdivision, will promote the general **gate of the City and will gn ctotly not be s� lei det .rintental nor .. _ .... . . surrounding properties provided that development nt a e h occurs after this decision complies with a p plicable local state and faders law s. I ,.. ,z UNGS OFFICER - SUB 94- our "JY C °instrt ction Co, • '4. �., sec g tlon of th(i . i' di statY 1 a� °? 94 for lek `Meade+ c t o h� condIt J,a t t 1 1°I0 S H ` T .B NUS IEID' °M:11) '' � s a S ,EC17'IED1 ` � I"? . ' ' :CQ"11 � �O -.MONS IS M ell IN' y' DI I» "f!1 '. "q -� 1r6 Saity y sewer and storm drain plan and profile shall. be ,ptpvidecil in accordanCe , wit .d the I We. Improvement wig Standards, date ' °February, 1994. TO (2) sets of det rated public , nproveritnt. plats ar►4 profile constaitkltion -.. drawings shat be 4ubinitted for prelioinary review to the E,ngirieering Department, rtment -even (7) ' sets of approved drawings mid one (1) itemized 1 � t'e a�� - , c�:��istrti�tio� cos t estimate,, p. � d a �'ro�'es�ic�nal ,lE� ,Yt�er, shall be sub 'tted for final review and approval NOO" d the so "- � review �� I 4 �1yb:it pltais are in g16m to 6%'Ii.)? drawlngs required b y the Builldi n g Dt vi si o t should oinclude she relevant it to public improvements. vements. The a rppli can,:k, s &�l, demonstrate that storm dm i na g ge t unotf can be et5atiargeci into �, g system without si cant/ the exstin�� underground without impacting properties downstream. A joint use and maintenance, greem nt shall be execute !• and iceordod on i it r standard � ortil for all clannion drwmewoys e agrOen Britt shall be regoenced, mn and become pat of all :applicable Deeds. . 0 g . a eei;nent shall be app ;'raved by the nginet•eT i ig Departriwnt prior to recording ST APP CONTACT, Irohn Hagman,1✓inginee lig DvartrittP,fit (639x 171). pp . i_. . p. p �► .. _ .. w �' "'�- onst�ar�.tcfiic� +� r��ee�; �tkn tie The �,��t%� "�wd'Clt shall ��k an appointment for a r�, City of Tigard tnginee,ring Dep rta ent after approval of thd'ptibu,e i i Love ent tans but site: W p t ��efore startling Mork on the site:. The applcattit; the 'applicant's engineer; and contractor shall i b� required to attend this meeting' prior to r etai�riltig approved nuns acid peimits. Construction. ' the propose(' publit h'! ro ements sd • Permits sha''t not co hence until after the Enginieering bepartmerit has rethe and approved tlhe 7ublic improvement& phis, a street opening' per ut .its t3FFrid.;ER sitAl 9410002, - ion ;onstructlt9n teem tree removal permit t shy be su butted which spe es those trees which are t6 '�►e 'rei ri red i cOntkettion with t1 co strructi'i,n of public ap venent:s. s tree rAo ova 4►hell be applied for and aPOsiNC.d by the Planning DiviSiott prior to removal of such trees on -ante. STAFF CON ictor .Adomiri, Platrnixg 'Asvision, Applicant shall submit to the Piing Division evidence or some f'orn gat' .sertiothis and beer from the neighbors property to the east of tic proposed private driveway. In addition, applicant shall be required to cox ►tract a privacy ' . fence before construction begins ski that current home owners are afforded a m' asure of priva . STAFF CONTACT; Victor Adoari, Planning Division. The applicant shall submit plans to the Operations s Department showing locati on public p manhole installation of � ublc e�.��Ynent for the sanitary sewer, and any proposed Q�sed rma�aihod instal where the catch basin line conn ec`s to the existing storm lite r STAFF CONTACT: John Roy, Operations Department, Applicant shall submit pins and comply \ following requirements Valley Fire & I escle District: : A "No Parking' sign shall ha installed on both sides of th e prop�c aed private o street. Fire hydrant is required within portions 500 feet of all o .� . of a re measured around the outside of the structure and along aa approved access Fire hydrants locations will .,:. i i .... will be co-approved with the Fire District roadway. Y and .d Tigard Water Department. STAFF CONTACT': (lent ' I3ircl ill,' Tualatin Fire & Resole District, (526-2502) • • HEARINGS OFFICER. : SIM 94-002 a Cd'dnstd°ilAalog. o 04' •' to SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement required Section 1801.60.170, the subdiE'videy r` shall ' 5e � ce' rte n f it c foa Ieeme�.t a�;�ur .�� 'ar� snp� f � �►� � ti . irrevocable letter, edit execute authorized to transact business in 'the State of 3ra bitittwon �A.surety bond. executed by a surety company a thorized to tea ' lousiness in the State of Oregon which remains, it force tli. the r *A may ter eo surd ' ified by the ty ing that it a a� is not i to ,.ated; or t'h T subdivider shall ivrnish to the ,it i ngineer an ite ed improvemeta estimate, certified by a registered evil eneneer,, to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the per ormance assurance• e subdivider shall not cai' a termination of nor ariow ,exxo atie `of said guarantee w.. i froth the City. �,• without having first secured -written. a�ahor�ation i SECTION 18.160.190 Filing and Recording • Filing �► Within 60 drys of the City review and ;approval, the applicant sot subi i for signatures of County officiais aS require � by ORS Cllapter 92. Upon final recording With t' County; the a City a inylar copy of the recorded final plat. i•a , 18.164.130 Cash or Bond Required . All h)31to'vements installed by the sutidivider shall anteed as Tor 4i to wordmanship and inateria.i. for a peric)ci of one year 101,.tawlicig acceptance by the city. Sub guarantee shall be securd by cash deposit or baod in the amount of the value of the imprOvexnentS as sOt. by the cty i Engineer. 05, otice to Ca 'Re \ M or sh; 111 not begin 4 'il , has oeen not n advance work is oi!wwoLyth ued for any reason it; shall tot resume� nr tried. The land divider's engineer shall provide WEitten 'certification of a form provided by th City that all imp ei inents, workrnaoship and materials ate in accord with a nTent and sta d;od enneering and construction practices, and are of igh v'r de, prio r , the City acceptance of the subdivision's' improvements or any portipit thereof for opera,ion and maintenance. SUBDIVISION )k PROV S -1(4 BE V D ONLY IF 1 FINAL P T IS IftECORDED EIGHTEEN OF DAIL OF TPAIS DECISION PREPAP,ED B' ersdorrg; &WINGS OFFICE* - SUB s4 -6, 2 For ' Coast ruction ow P. gE 2 O :.....: r....�,wwrd.,.....a.i.r..+ -,.a� . �i5u..a,..wa... ; .....:.. • February 23, 1994 Planm yg Commission Tigard City Council. 13125 S W Hall blvd. Tigard, OR. 97224 Gentlemen: On January 31st we attended a meeting with the Four D Construction Company regarding plans for a residential development adjoining our homes h' Summexfield. Copies of their letter and our response are attached. We appre,;niated the opportunity to meet with the representatives of the Four D �y word but frankly we wen:: �� h� ":!f t�� work; Cc�nstrvc tioi� Company prior to the c ©nen�cen..� u� , Y disappointed with the vague information presented at this meeting. We are concerned because the property to be developed will not be under the conditions and restrictions of the Summerfield Civic Association (SCA) Therefore, the will e no control over the use of the adjoining property as far as landscaping, maintenance, ak mal ann noise; control and other restrictions that we are requii d, to follow; This letter is to formalize our concerns directly with the Planning Commission. We be. li eve there a. re a number of questions ae stions a.._..n d one ,that � __ ... were n „ . a dequat ely addressed. Fug erno �� we believe the Four nstr ction representatives i ve s w e 3e un necessarily vague reg ardin g the specifics of the development p1ais. In addition to q uestions presented to Four D Gontlraction on Janualy 31, 1994 se e attached letter), we would request that the Gommis ion p ay particularly attention to the following matters: 1. Review all devei o p nen, . plans, _ nA u� n that all required set back,rmage and general zoning requirements tire met by the developer. 2. Insure that the housing t dens�t�� ic�� proposed by the con,ctor i,� ��ixthin accepted Insure P "' y .. , - e ...._.o will be ba it but are s of the staff'. • homes w � city guidelines. We li�lie�u °�. thee �� hL the older residence c utentl.: located On it y p. � l y _ i . 3. We requested .. • , . , ester fat the &,;v eloper c�nsct a �., �c fence before coniseho .gi so that the current home ....:; afforded .a tasure of privacy Tie bei.. • Y . , r��e o�r��x uest„ see recommended ; ix�e sp,�icatio developer was; vague inviting this attachment # l.). 4. we aitt also cantered twat the constructor k. o� the ltauscs ��11 bl�l� out • • • Ott our nstruction ': r B+�X 1577 i`eaverton Oregon, 97� one (503) 641„ -0935 is is in response to your letter `dated ,J nuar y 14, ,1994 regarding ;our Manned construction ' on the property l acated' -at 9185 SW Duf am Road. As operty owners adjacent to of � a�y. j � the �.:�e�'�need , .p , ,p ° y � definitely �o art � , � we are What types of structit'7es are being planned`i rind e n�o r. y ��' you you plan construct a fence � , we hest that you include ou �� to c your � plan now, w +do not have this in y , y cane. Our a,ecorainenc tion wo 4 be as fol10 is. y Fr a. 6 foot fence b. 4 x 4 posts not to exceed 8 foot , on center • Posts to ` be treated and t in 3 foot hole's, back fitted with 2 inch minus gravel - Not Set In Concrete. Fence boards to ; be 2nd grade or better cedar. • Fence to be installed prior to AN ccnstruetio t, f; Fence boards to be nailed on hurl :ontal rails o staples.> your plan for the exists trees a On the property What �,� y p � � property line? What 1,s osit on is t; be riade of the existing ®��d� p to �e two story home?. • W «re and what kind of streitt access is planned? s How close (la feet) will the proposed structures ' ire front the existing Suintrielfield kettles? c ur 'on o �s p rchas of locatt l 4,,t':‘ in I 'Le"'legal ;,les ption is, gay to r ` ` n ;bu 'iota► that' tai be ie te. no `� h'e, a istir rio c Gi► r a ea ie ei1y ± f Tigar for tote net . xy peer ts, vi o�i,� ;to seas �o me eta; t i the "' n FL:* :: ing prop ity ets,a nd res tents, ou a i ,e;, ` to tend sec ►g toe, w 1.t a note this will be an f tfor i ation, a e t g o rel imIntry plans.. These a s may altered prior to the submittal of the application to i look forward to more spec v y g proposal y e e catl me at 6? discussing wad o� �'i 0935 if you have any questions, i ncerely v TO: cxry TIr , o: Victor Adonri Michael Anderrsone ' Development Reviow Engineer SUB 94- 0002 Rrieck '_MeP, ,� /,i /Four D k1: l 3 4 arch 9 r D eacr The applicant proposes to. subdivi'ce a parcel of approxinatel.y 0.65 acres pp The site ,is located on ..h M north side Road at into 4 Iota. � �. �,� ide of SW Duxhan�. SW 92nrd Avenues adjacent to the Summerfield development. Findi : . Streets: The project will take access from a proposed" private driveway . fro Road is classified as a connecting to S�1 Durham, Road. SW Durham Rand has been dedicated Major Collector on the Comprehensive Plan, . n is required with the exception of the removal of the and improved to the ultimate width No addition street exnst,ructiA i qu The driveway construction existing driveway that serves the eXst�.ng residence. r g � re-routed access . lots. '� the new Private a for the existing house will be xe rc�utPd t that will serve all four proposed ©sed 2 Sanitary Sewer: The aPplicant .pr(',:.'osea to constrIlct a new main that will connect to the existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer line that iS located behind the curb in SW Durham Road. The 6xistingline has the capacity . °. to serve 1whiS development. a Storm Sara- i.age . . , .r. '', c , the storm water in a new appllca��` pro Dees t.�� collect , The; to t_.. uncxegrounr� systerm ��rd connea1� he existing' storm sewer system located should verify that the existin � �s: stn has�t bhe capacity to serve this development 8 g y The U`nigiedd Sewerage Agency has establishld atd the City has afire .r4 .. ..: _. ° - I � Management to enzoa ce (Reso -lt�ti �n ar�d t�rder boo 91 47 � �,uxfaci dater M� Re ulation!3 re iris the construction of on site water, quality or, fees i,i � -lieu of their construc44 ion Requ� ri rg surface , waterita.es facilities on small sits s woul result in \ numerous water quality a ti,. facilities ..�dt would become a maintenance burden to the City, Furthermore, the applicant hae' not propose any :zuc:h faciliti. C and there a .e no nat rai depressions or other areas of this site tha t are particularly idr orator quality ,fa calities . Re gi on ai ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUS 94-02 �� .. - PAGE ��r MEADOW/FOUR � 4Ml Y. CO Li t d ¢��.: � onstructrion o� . th�3�.e acili�t es ` funded by Fees in lieu i roved e facilities,/ would provide ; the rec, ii,r,,d : treatment ' w :�t s ,;died � applicant � reliability and less mainttaancc. rher4fare the app re traF 3 aced: to pay the fee in -lieu of constructing an on -site fac ia i.ty n eottviriendti$ e: ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FXNANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR T RECORDING THE rINAL' :PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. Sanitary sewer and storm drain plan . and profile shall be dprovid�" c� accordance with the City Public Publc Improveme nt Design 8�ta n Febx'uary`, 1994. J li Two (2) set s of detailed pu blic itnprevement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for , preliminary _ preli m na y v t to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved g one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all ,p re aced by a Professional Engineer, Shall be submitted for review and approval I61oTE : these plans are tn addi. to any d r win s required wilding! Division only relevant to by the � ision and should oral include Sheets rQl public improvements. �� runoff can, be °� demonstrate that storm drainage applicant sha�.�.., demonstrate without • The app discharged into th existing underground system the e�cisti significantly nificant impacting properties R g y downstream. ▪ A se and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recr rded joint u s for all of all applicable agr em standard forms common driveways The shall City sreferenced on and became part,.. , P able' parcel Y be referenced �s the Engineering Reeds » The agreement shall be approved ed by Department prior Ito recording. 'neer3.tag Department 53941`1) STAFF CONTACT: aohi,, ragman, Engineering make ointment for a p cart pen rsction licant sha�:�l. maace an ap)Y� � � a The app ., ringre start .n r , fter meeting; � ` thy: City of Tig�a�rd Enc�3neer�.ng p ... . ° approval of the piublic imp Plana but work with licant the applicants s eng ctor, pp ineer,: anti. ocn �'ra the site. The Apr , o � g ' ecevi,ng the shall be �ec�ui.r� d to attend this .uoetin prior �.o r app ..roved plans And permits. Construction of the proposed pu��c` i.mpraveme'ntS and inane of CanstBuildin Permits Shall r . nts elrin, g it not commence until after the Ena�'ineer ng Department has reviewed and apps° .'gyred the Publio lance oaveme p s ree�ents ha . p a street op�Mnnc� permit or Ccanstructa.o � c.. � agreement and. been execv ,.ed, egeoution of a develo `� air engi neer a, M p payment of all erltit fees. .: the plat being recorded With g County' �t ho hin...�on .._ i appli to ll ;.: Provide a 100 percent per�for" e bond. As a plat plat the p ant may knave the p rerecorded after the a 2icant ; . . at'�ernative tk�e appla.ca accepted by the (pity of Tigard end has public improvements have been potted the appropriate Maintenance Bond, ENGINEERING CQ mE3TS 0 IQE. lCX ow /F.. OUR ,.. AGE / 4 DDITTO N '�HE`;`.'M?LiCANT S}1OULt) COMMUNITY A^,iMLOPMENT° CODE; TliI' SECTIO1 ' 1 .1 0. 1? J Improve; Eefore it approval..;. approved co strraict .a Attbdiv .der shall* Il. �1 E)E.t FO,LOW; EXCiCt:SI ent; Me', er' if ;0 0: e tIEL ) a* s are '`> .sptied a" or Este ^:ate and file an ':ag,eemen , with , the , C "cy gnginee ' ��eci£ying the period wi,th;�.n which :a11,,. ' required ilnprovemetats' an,d repa.i;s shallif,be' completed; and include in ,th' agreement pro s'sio s that if not completed! within the.`perY�'od spe't» Uio'd, the 'dity y complete t1;ie works., and recover the i j11',,,1coat aid e$penses r:om the s o,bdivider . the agreement grlial.l stipulate improvement feet,, and de may and : may also prcv:4 de � , be ireq�� t�td to be pa,�,� construction the improvements in stages and extension of t•i.n e. under .-spedific cOndi dons therein the contract. ry ' : SECTION • 18.160.1.30 Et3AC Pros i s 44 s,. for the f ter 'the. statd.n As i egiil re ►d by Sectioii , "16.160 41 q, the surdiVider shall file with the agreement an assurance of Perfordianoe supported by one of the following: An ,irrevocable letter of credit executed , by' a nazicial institutiorr authorized to trans .r t business i a the State, of 'Oregon; A st:rety ,,Ond eitecuted by a surety 'Company 6,,iath cixed to tkansact b tsineSs in the fState of'' Oregon t�ah .i: +h r;ema� ns t's;t�. .� ICs a + "' ed by the. Cis ►stn .�urc� � �-'� � the surer.:: cop � �:s x�oti.£i writing that i may, be termtated; Or Cash. der shall furnish d b .axe atQrec cir.l eirgmf itemized ivi4 Shall .. o the City to ineer ani to (improvement ' neet o .L:61'� s °aw��: ' e>' v:�rti�ie by :a .. �` to stiet the ity engineer in calculating the ,a punt of the perforitia ce assurtihce The nor allo�:� r ., der shah: not' c�aus�: �� subdivider ..... � telnin� iiaa f � , 'epigat:o�l of raid guarantee` itx.ut %,ts,� secured writtet authorisation from the City. ki �!E�1C�jT N q '0:100 ilinc and R do di iq �7Ci\..i 1 ��LV .L, �1 YY I:I A Wit i days of the ('ity review and age rot: tl, 'ac in CS he' a ipiict ; t. shall submit the final pare to the COrahtii fOt signatVoe� ,County official$ as requ.hed bY O%S Ct,'apte)4' 92'; ENGINEERING dOMM 141 8.314 94- 02 ' i ,Ell* 0WiFAQ, D :P4dt, Lt •�• h C 3 p xt .n l reoQI'diTL wL cint ' t, a pp" .icani e b it' to the City a m 1e ; oo`p ►',; fF he rde f nai P1 ACT OO ,8.x.62 final. ? .at ». ap icatio n St at i3si ►{ ui' oment Three s1 ; the r d part oll plat er ated ' by a lanrt suv e71 linens& 1 praotice µ r Ow gons and,:, necessary'' data ;4Y.Y r a ✓ ,„ � ' i , � fir,' na�rr�,�iv�,� ho,, tpartitiot : plat and t x? to parr rtiv )30 , ra minimum sta�b�ard�s set forth by the Oectiori Zev.a ed Statutes • (� C>" i �, �► 3'', ashinaton .Count p, and by tlie Cty of Ticjatd.' �k Ali it s t e t . o- for e el.eotri•a',Y 0�Yttktet ��iticati�it) l .ghtri g .a' d l 't ele ri :'io.A ervi.ce 1 • ; t d ,,', r� ater faci it .e San be l ec urQdera rou id� a ept fir s a a e oialn`;'er . y ansfoa ersr surface o 'tounted conn�� t of boxes S. � e'er s:b.net yic bo . pace gave croundo w�t;4. ut lity s� vi�c facilities urirq Dons ru tia n�` . h gh. oapacit v',-electric liriosi `,r6perating at 0 i00 rc� ,t or above. 0.15'4'0130 Cash or . Bond 'Bemired d ll Hitoprov,extients. installed by the s abdivider Sha11. lbe guaranteed. as to trorknan'ship anpS to is : for .a period 'OfK. one year follovino. acceptance o p: the City Such 4, arantr e . l be secured by cash deposit or bon in the +neunt of 'the �ra lue. the-- s et bk the City- . L. • The Case or bond shal, compi',y iiit .th trithit aril conditions of Sections iS . i60 018 . . nstallationt. pier .ai 0i o / ?e ± ` 'er 'lo land` division ii provementS.q 14nc1uding `sanitary s %a'+ ,rs. storm set' ers streets i e a s� curbs lighti o :other requirements shall be 0pidc:a+ tehn e a 'C*icep'o t plahs therefor Nave been approved acfrtmeirt:ee e paid and , persmii';; issueda • 18,1 4.100 Notice to 04::ty,Ht4tquited i . Work shall not beg.rn until the City 'has beer notif ied .advance., • If :work' is discontinued nor any reaso i, it ' ha y. neat be resumed until ' the City;:i,e..•0#4,ffietiL 8NCXNEERXNG COMMENTS ri1UB 9 0 SICK *bow FOUR PAG , ..:, $.UBDIVISTON 508 94- 0000.2 F`ipag JFOUR .D LOCAT10j ':' 9185 8W Durham Roa. (WCTM 2S1 `11DC, ,,tax lot 7400) . The applicant ` requests Subdivision t elim, nary Plat approval to divide one parcel of approximately 0.65 .acres into, faux > lots ,between 5,070 and 6,024 square feet in size. APPLICABLE l'Igif " CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.3., 4.201, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, '7 • ,4 . Ai; 7.6.1, 801.1 and 8.1.3; , Community Development Code Chapters '18.5:5, .'88, 18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 48.108, ' 18.114, 18..180, 180150 and 18.164 ZONE: -7 (Residential, 7 nits/acre). the R-7 toning designation allows single- family <' detached residential units, public :4 L,pport . facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, .manufactured homes, home occup: .ltions, temporary uses, and accessory 'structure: among otter ruses. 'Attached, is the ; Site Plan. and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from Other. information available `�o our .staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the year future If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by mar. ?, 1994. You May use the space' provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. 1 ,�rou are na ,le . to respend b" : the alcove. date please phone the staff .contact noted' below With your co thents and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this, matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13115 W Hall Blvd. , Tigard, OR 97223, PHONE: 639 -4171 STAPP CONTACT: Victor Adonri PLEASE CUECK THE FOLLOWING ITEN8 THAT APPLY We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact , of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: DATE: ,. Fe.oruwar 23 1994 ROM': Tigard ;Platixing. Department r , S.UBDIS, /iSIdN : SUB 940002 .:. MIS.1S POUR B LOCA7CION. 9185 Sir' Durham Ra43 (WCIVI 2S1 11DC, tax lot 7400). The applicant recqu, sts . Suxdiv'iti on Preliminary P;l.a.t approval to iiVic4e oni. parcel of approximately 0. 65 are 40;4:3 four lots between 5,070 and 6,824~ square feet in size. APPLICABLE P EV% RW CRITERIA CaMpreheiisive Plan ',tiPc- - .c,, es 2.1.1, : :' 4.2,,l, 7 ..1, 2 , 7 . 3 .1. . 4.4,, 47.6.1, 8.1.1, aild 8 „ 9 3 ; Commuri%ty Devalopmc nt' (ode Chapters 18.52 , 18 <. 88, 1.92, 18.100, lir .102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 1i60, ' and 18.164. ZONE: R -7 :(Residential 7 unit /acrd) The is -7 zoning 'designation allows sin1 farm ly detached re s;%deait,.al, units, public :Ar;4.port facilities, resi.dergtial treatment - homes, x4:' � zari ing , nanufactured homes, i home accuafz3ors temporary usf.>,s, and actIwzso"Y structures among oth er uses . Attached is the Site, Plan and 6pplicant's. statement for ,roue' review, Frcr information supplied by variOus departmetI s and. agencies and from 'other infrercnation available to our staff, a report ,a cd ecommendatioi"i will be prepared and a decision will be ended ran the proposal th the ,near, future. If you wish to c.kmment on this application , we need your comments by 1�7 arr.. , -1994. ' oil ma?; use the space arovi ed below or attach a se P axat e letter ret�r n your comments, _ 2ti are unable to the above date pl ease phone the y s.w c ca n tac noted bobw with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If y�:u have any questions regarding this muter, contact t:he 'Ti,gar Planning DepactmlAnt; 1312.5. SW Hall 81vd. , Tigard, OR 9'7223. PHONE: 639 -417l STTA P' CONTACT: ,, Victor Adnrir i PLEASE CHECK THE FQrJt.OYt 1 NG ITEMS THAT APPLY ilosiiisommiarhon We hav e reViewed the proposal aic �av� no cia3 �c4 �oxs ; Please contact ' of coot office Please refer to the enclosed letter, Written Comments Phone Number: : OOO2 I rr� icl �r�r itachecra0 the 00ennlentStOritarnS rfrOritihe MaintOnarvIti'SorvicesOlviditiri 1you h a any cluestionS, you'May,contactirro approp iate de a menge WVV/STOFIIVIH John Roy, extension. ,Oy do not shore a public" easement for the sanity w or, Thee, r ar hoIe installed where the catch ba.__n lams Ortitetts to existing storm line. STREETS ® Bob White, extension 336 ' know be r, ncernsd with it, but, I for ee some egress problems I don't �� It we want during high traffic flow` PARK m Floyd Peoples, extension 3C Property fronting Durham Road should maintain that portion of Durha 1 °a landsca area igard ,Planning 'SU DIVISICN SUE 94. -0002 KREIC, JJ D OCATION: '9185 SW Durham Road WC 1 1 DC, tit: lot 7400) . The appi .cant. re iris SubdiViSion Preliminary Plat approval 't ►' divide one pamrge1 of approximately 0.65 acres into four lots 1:)e 4.ween 5,0/0 ° and 6,824 sure feet in size. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, '4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3; Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18.88, 18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.1q14, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164. ., , . . ... ZONE: , I -7 (Residentia] °�' units "acres h -7 zoning dessg Cation a1 laws single - airily detached resi enttia1 unito, public support : facilities, residential treatment homes, fe mirkg, manufactured homes, hc."ei occupations, temporary uses, and r.ccesso y structures among other ':.ses . Attached is the $ite Plan and applicant's statement . fctr ; your ri view. From a'on suppliva by various departments and agencies and troth other information available to our staff, a report and re :ommsndatian will. be prepares and a decision 'win be reuderet,1 on the propoeai in the near future. If you wicsh to coenrent, on this application, we need YoUr comments by Mat. 7, 1994 You ina use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your co nrnents . /1.,121.1 are unable to res„ __ b the above date . please • Phone the staff contact noted ' elo With your cowmen and conf iris+ your coknments in writing als soon a.s passi'bl t . If you , have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Departneri - . t, 13125 SV7 Hall Blvd:, Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: X39 X171 STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adotiri PLEASE CHOCK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have rFV°iewed the propos a nw, objections to it ,, a� and have Please contact of our office. ease refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: k 1' Name of Pereon Commenting= . Phone Number a �JJ� MEW. worowsermigium lA.Yw1� FROM: Tigard 2lannin, Department '�_ , R . SUB Y3 VI S_ON S cJ8 94-0002' . KR Cy`' p R p LOCATI0 4 r 9185', SW Durk? h ' pad it (WC! , i 251 11DC, ta7 lot 7400) The applicant requests Sube, i 'tsi.on Preliminary Plat ° >apprcval to d avide one par'. E i of approximately 0.65 acreo into, four lots between 5,070 ,and 6,824 gt.are, feet in , site,. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7 T 1.2,,7.3.1, a 4 . 4, 7Y 6 i 1, 8.1.1, and 86 1rJ y Ccumiunity Development Code Chapters 18,52, 1 ,80,, 18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 16.160, and 16.164.. 7 1 units /acre) The R -7 zoning deeig.nYatiob, a,Uows. ��E�� R� � (Residential, �, , singi6i- faiaily detached residential units, public support facilities, 'residential treatment farming, manufactured homes, home reatment h+�mes, occupations, tempora1.7 uses, and, accessory structures among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your 'wevi ewa From Maus. departments and e recommendation winl1 be prepared information supplied bl, various ,` information available to our staff, a report and +r " ' If you prepared and a decision Will be rendered on the proposal in the near future, to comment on this application, we need your comments by 'Mater. 7, 1954. You May use the apace provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments, Lou are unable to res pond b the above dat„ e,t„ please, phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and Confirm your comments in writing as soon as regarding this matte . the Tigard possible. Pag Department, 13125 Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223. cPHONE: t639�- x,171. �ax�rixng Department, STAFF CONTACT: Victor ctbr Arlorra: PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMO ITEM THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Pleaeo contact of our office, Please refer to th e enclosed letter. Written Comments: e0 try. V1. 4 - `- -• r'in- .. ,� 6 A t 4; a -v ') • L M l .a me of Person Commenting: 1) Phone Number: a� 7. WIEST i'00.; .d0t4111MT,S..',. . „ . . . .. . . . . . T tP -.. .',.,..b4yrgt, FROKi-Tigard Plarinitig.! DepartMent..-'..' '''.''',' - ''.',' '. - . , ' . . " .' - '' '-''.' ' . : ' ,' • f - • , -'. . ' . -•.• ---..-.. -- .; - - .' .. - ' -. '... ,...---',. ; , , ...,,,, - -,,',...•-, -. ..,-,-..' .,..',,.,......,.. -,. - , .5.1t1BDIVISION.,,,.':,Stla' 94-y0002 - l(REICIt/POOR.-D...r.,p6Nricr,,I;t, 4185 . SW .brhar4,:-:ROad iiPIC."114...', 281.. - -11PC,-, ,'.-tar lot ,, '7400) ,, .. - . 1'1'10 . applicant tequests.. Subdivision 4 4 . 44 —4. • r 0.65 ' . . , ■ Esk.11„Trattary Plat approval- to -divide pne.partel of,.appro:,ta.mately:..-atres into ..four lots betwi=en '5,010. and -6,8241,,:s4uate„ ft..et...,in--size.-',' -APPLZtA8Teg, REVIEW CR/TERT.A:.: ' t-.prehenSive 'Plan PolitieS 2,,1.1„,.. 4. 2.1.. , '. 7 2-;;.,-'7.1.!....,3-.1„, 7.44, 7. : i, . ..a . i .3.,, and 84.3; Community 'DewelopMettaods,ChaPters '18.52,' 18.88'' 18.91,''18.100, .184-02„ .18,108, 18.'.1144,18..150;:l8160', aind-I8'..1C-4.. - . . , , . i . ZONE l' Htl -7 '(ROeidentiaL' 7 14nits/aCre). The 4t7o0itig,i-4esignation 61.1Cws iihe'faMi.111':dtactiod. ro`lciantialUnits,HOubliC'..tvAPPort. f*:ilitiOs4 reeidential treatment homeS, ' farming, '1manufactured hOmes,, ' ',home , occuPations,•tempOrarY Us6S, and aCCOsSork,strOctUreS.among other uses. , . , . Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From inforghation supplied by various departments and agencies and from other inform4tion available to our staff, a repOrt and recommenclat:'i„on Will be prepared and a decision will be tendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Mar. 7, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If rou are unable ta_Leapond bit the above date . please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and conWirm`Your comments in writing as soon as pdiosible. If you have any questions ry4garding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 630-4171. STAB'P CONTACT: Victor Adonri PLEA8E CHECK THE POLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter . W itten comments: ARNOW A „Mr a ■1 41. Namo of Person Commenting: wirrawo#1111111111110M aceilalkionmeniormomr,,eid■ti.iimerimenion■orriro:+moremallisre44Sri‘Ove 0,6 1/44 / r Phone PUmber: • iiiiir4,44..4444.444.4rmarerrarr...44444,44.44.4,..4441.444.■:411.441.444.0,,,i4 2-44:0.4( AY- 014-LI.1 p A F%tt'M Tigard "Plaau &ng, pepartmez t DATA;: Febx' a 2 ',994 SU►BDIvisioN UB 94- 0002, IIREIC%t FOUR D LOcATZC11�Y: ; 'M185 'SW,' burrham \Roars' (WC° I 2S1 f .11nc, tax lot 7400) ., The " app i.cdnt ree ue is ,SUbdiviSion' „Prelilititiary Plat 'approval tc thv3de one p p m Y` 0.6$ acres F. ;�aF� �� f ,� a pr��t�.matel into four lots between 5,070 and 6,824 .y'quare feet in size. : AP?L ZGA$I"�E Coznprehens vei'Plan Policies 2.1.1,', , 4.2..,, 7.1.2, CRITERIA: 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 0.1.'3: CoMmUnity, `Development `C ode,'Chapter.8 18.52, 1,9 88, 18.92, 18,.100, , 18.102, 18:108, 18. 114, 18.150 18.160, and , . 1.164., PLGiNF. R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre) The R- ► zoning' debijnation 41lowd sin41e- family detached residential units, public stapport fact `t'ri;es., res ',dential treatment homes, , manufactured homes a '' 'home, o;:cr pak ions, temporary uses, and accessory structures onib other lases.' AttacUed is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From inZormation supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,: a report and .; ecommendatipi will be prepared and a decision will be r.01 i dered on the 'proposal in t ; a near future. If you wish to comment on this app ir',ation, We "need your coments by Mar, 7, 1594. You may Use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return yi37.ii comments. IF ou are unable to respond b the above ;date • please phone the staff Contact noted below with Your comments and confirm your cbmment.s in writing as soon as Possible. ` If You have any questions regarding this mattero Contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., , Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF_ CONTACT: Victor Adonri CRECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT , AP'L' We have reviewed the proposal and have no b j ect ions to it. Please'' contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments Name of Person Cop ttenting xY�d;�3 �.W ___.• ig1Department .r�c�'d �� 3Ybd3� OCAT ZO : 9185 SW Dur aam, Road " --,... --1. -- SiTs3 ,5 dal „gC �a C t EiR ` ... 4 ,,', .aC ie:3 ,a�11't ji .5.dZ1.,;_ t6�C'T� 2S1 li.', : tom; lot '%4Uq''.' Thk� a�'pl � .� rox�im�.�. /'�y �,.55,�,,�cc3 Preliminary Plat apprd val to .divide o'ls e parcel 'o pp A..' acres 6 '82? het in siz square � into 'four 3ot:;t - between- S, 07 1) ' 'and, � • � ti w �' � ' 7 . u � 1+ 'REVIEW CRITERIA Comprehensive Plan Pot .cies _;2.1 -,1 4 2 . '7 I. 2, R 1 «4.4, 7.6.1, .6 1.1, and 8.i.3; Community' IDevel'opmen,t Code Chapters 18.164. c 8 88, 18.92, 18'.100,.° .1 0/�2�y ��yy, '� y �g ins Ise 18.160, �.RJ L7Jlri,`, 1�w�Qp� ..,�,,,�w �d,Rlts is- Ise, Z, w .� t ° rC) The ;i -7' zoning! designation, allows ZC�i� � R-7 (�eai�+��stise.�,� 7 units %ark, a.l.3.t'xeg �, single - family det. residential resdresidential uni s, public- support .f ac �'ot.idantal , , treatmaen^c , hoMeS► - rNarrnn.tig, ' mil' uf'actoU r..qM :s homes t home. Occupations,. t(rnporary uses, °and aceesso r struct7 "cet§ atiOng other uses. Attached' is the Site plan .and applicant S st .temea for/. your review. Prom �:mforiatiot s .ppla.ed hY various departs ►e:�,ts ane' agen�r,ies i nq%' ,from of aer informatiO ;4 available to our staff; a report and re: `ozirrendat of ,sill ;be prepared and a,'deeisian wig! l be rendered on the proposal. in the ,near .futu' e. _f you wish to comment on this: applications we need your ' Comcaents 1-'y a 7 , 19 .. coYnou may use the space provided below or' attach a separate lett it to. return your If u are unable t i res hi d y b fil e ab ove date . ee p hin+ t% e • st cntct noted aelo* . Wa:tY you. cc tr:rynts and confirm y ur c r mente n wrat of oa ' possible. ' If you have any qestions regard7l.ng this matter, conta ct tYye' `Ti 3 and 7 1 . . p,kan�.rag DF +paxtnen, 1125 rd, 4R '�7221 P�i+�NE• 639- 1 S� Hall 81vd. � �' g'a STA `1F CONTACT: victo AcT i PLEASE' CHECK TH a VOT.,LOO /NG ITE 4S THAT APPLY : We have reviewed the proposa, l and havo nc ohj ect ions to i t . Pleaae contact of our office. please refer tr, the enclosed letter. Written Comments:` game 'of Peerson Comriierat inr Phone Ninth : . a : Tigard Pla,nning ;Departm.me SUBDIVISION SUB' 94- 0,(X1.2 KRE„, CK€- F'OUid, 'D LO TToo, Road. (i� C';. Th1 .221 1lDC ', to �.+�`+ 7'400) The a+�P1icaht requests " �ubd .vif,io a Pr.el r;minary ..J la�it• 1a pproval. try 'divide one parCel of. approximately O. 65 ,acres into four ,'lots` between 5,070 and; "6, 824 .s +a e' e t ' .an . s z . AP L►ICP BLE R k*I-67 CRITERIA: ,Comprshaensive .Flan, Policies 7.4 ' 7 ".6.1•, 8.1.1, and 8:.1.1; COMMUnity'bewelopment ,Code Chapters 16 52, 18.8:8, 18.92, 18.100, 18.1102, " 18' 10'8 18.114, 18.156,-18.', .50., an4 18.164'. ZONE:: R-7 '(Residential, 7 unite /acre) The P. -? toning designation allows dingle- family detached ;i3sidOttial public support facilities, residential treatment homes, ', matnuf ctured homes,, home occupations, temporary uses, ` and accessory structures : among other uses Attached { is one Site Plan and .appllz.canc''s staters end y o ' yibur review in Ormati n supplied by various' departments and age;`5�, ;'ie A and from ;other. information available' to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal' in the hear 'future. If you wish • . to comment on this application.. We need your comments by Mar J, 19,94. You, may use the space provided below or ,attach a' separate letter to return your commo ts. �C.f' you are. unable .to. ragfejd 1 tits above date, please phone the Staff contact T1 I ! aO./�1- TIY.wM�orll�IrWl�r4 r � IIY. rl dRrAldl"Ea y.r^� � � � � � • ' , � r . � noted, below with our comments confirm our. cor�,ments in .,writin as soon as Possible- If You have any questions re'ardi ag this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hali Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PHONE: 639-4171. STAVE' CONTAL £ . Adbnri PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITFAS THAT APPLY: We . have reviewed p - to it . .:ev�.ewecl rrie ro" os�s and haws too oc�1s, ,bons "lease contact ; . ..., of cot office. �,. Please refer tO the enclosed letter. Written Comments: .. ............. , . .. rwlwwriv ..rrairA G:arodwoma Name of Person Commenting Phone Number: FROM:` Tigard Planning Department SUR I_ SION SUR 94.00 �2 �RR I�K FOUR D ° CATION: S i Durham Roa (WC 2s1 11DC tax lot 7400,x. The licanu Subdivision pry li inary Plat approval tc divde adios d one parcel of a 1pre xima e1y 0.65 , into four lots between, - 5,010 aid\ 6,824 square eet sit: APPL C BL2 3 V :w 67 CRITERIA: Compzehemsive :Plan Policies 4t ;.2 .1, 2, 3 1. 4 r A, 7. 6 . 1, 8 . 1.. and 8 . 1 . 31 Comm it De q ictiN nt !,Mode ChaptOr ,184 5.21, 18.68P 18 =92, 18.100, 10.102, 1 ales, 10-14, .. . 1?�,.150, ,10.160, and 18,164. ZONE: R-7 (Residential, 7 units /acre) ,' The R -7 zoaaing ,deslgna\i ion allows single - family , detached reslclontial . l.4nits,, public Support�fle ,ties residential treatment homes, farming, s nuf cturedr ,homes, hom occupations, temporary uses, and accessory 'Structures aamc ng other uses Attached Is the Site Plan and applicant4 s statement for ,rour review. 'ram infor ti'on supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a. report and reconmendat.'o'na w l,ll be prepared and ,a decision -will be rendered on the ptroposal in the near future. If you wish to cc at on this application,, Vett need your ccriatnto by Mar >+ 1994. You may use ..th■ N' space provided below or attach a separate left' /i.er to return 1,our coign i � r�u . .. re w v� `�, 94tom. r esa y n: bth€ above date please e pho ne the staff c' ,ta �c t noted l� �� 1 ��r comments and rJl©nfiil your �d, ents in rit v � � 9©an possible. If you have any questions regarding this atter, contact t he Tigard Planning Dep�rt.ent 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, OR tte3.: O gi . STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adortri- PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING nEMS THAT APPLY:, .... . We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it Please re)o.er to the enclosed letter. Written Coents V - O 4 �- � �'fY�M. l:iA1�i11Ad�leCe'1�4q RC�Mlii0�1 /�1h °iC1111R•I,IRI� ..... aae.lpcs rr i BARRIM1.70P.COMUEINITS E: ►a? ='fir 23_,..:,x. 994 . • Tigard Planning Departmerit. • ' " V1sION. SUE 04-000 :11 KRE /CK"'POUR b Lr CAT1014: 9185 Durham ,,..1 cla i • W ' 2S1" UDC, tax ]riot 1400)', The applicant rec este $ubdivT�sion ei. rninary Plat ,approval to tiff aide one .parcel a e a'pprocimately 0. Gb acres, i nt.of; four .g.c is between 5 4 070 and 6, 824 square fest itt size. AP ' rIC iht,E:' R � CRITE A,: Cc4npre.hensive Plat . ?ol,iOies 2.1.1, 4.2 1 4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3; Caxntnusiit IDevelbpment code Chapters' 18 1 .88, 18.92 18. 100, 18.102, 18.108', 18 .114 18 .150,, 18:160, and in .164. t64,. ZONE: R-7 (Residential, `7' units /acre) The Et-7 zoning clesignat:i.on allows single-family detached "residential urti.ts,' u 1; support ac�.la.t es, residential treatment holes, farming, mantufactt' ed homes, hc«- z. occupations,r temporary user, and accessory structures among other uses Attack eiil is the. ite Plan and applicant's . statement for, your' review. From in'fOrmeikaon supplied by 'various departments' and agencies and from ' other inkormlition available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prOpa ,red and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near fut9: re. If yo'a 'wish lea' comment on this application, we nerd your cotanen 'was by Mar., ' a . ;1 994. , You, may use the spi., a provided below or attach a separate letter o:o r'4Wti. r . your ('omments. contact rou are ,aan�,�ble �t o resiaoncl by . the above date . pi'ease, phone the sLaff noted below wi{ n your comments and confirm your comments iri writOg as soon as possible, : If you 'have . any questions regarding', this , matter, contact . the Tigard Planning ng Dep*rtment, 13125 39 -4171, 5 St � 4�all: Blvd., Tigard. OR 9'��.'�3 r F::i4�'E. 6 ST AFF dn4aA4",»Ts Victor Adohri .. .... ..�., . PLEASE CHECK THE tOLLOWING ITEMS THAT ^ <r'PL"Y we have reviewed the proposal and have no obj ec)tionS to it . Please` contact .... of out o`ficb. Please refer to the enc1oSed lette . Written t'ommnea is 4. Mane o Person Commenting: Phone Wi nbpr r. FROM,: Tigrard Plann ng Department sp`E: 'SUBDIVISI9N SUB 94 -0002 'KCREICK FOCI' . D LOCATION; 9185 5W Durham Road (WC T1,1 251. 11DC;_ tax ' lot 7400) . The applicant re . eel:` '`Subdivision Prel.iimi airy , Plat approval to divide parcel of 'appr okimately 0.65 acr°:s into tour lots `b(;'4ween 5.070 And 6,824 square rep., in *., e. :'PLICABj.hE REVIEW CRITERIA: , Comprehensive plan Policies 2.1.1, ;4,, 2 ,10 7 1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4 .4 . i, 8 and, 8.'1..3 Community Development 'Code Chapters it t.52, 18.88, 18.92, 16490, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.,1t0, 18.160, ' and 18. 1,64 LONE: R-7 (Residential, 7 units /at.ce) The R-'7 zoning designation single - family deta,ohed residential units. blic ;support fac litleg, residential treatMent homes, farming, , manufacturd homes, 'home occupations; temporary uses, and accessory structures' a iiong other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's stato ent ` for your reviews. From information supplied by various,; e'1epartmentc :,rid agencies and frOra other informati,� �:vailable to our staff, rig report and recommendation will be prepared, axl . e the pro sal in h by Ndar. 7, 19 4. you wish + decision need your �. �n `the near � `f to comment on this, apj�,�,•cation, we You may dec: �. be rendered on nae ,. �,szon Will � ' to return our. comments.' k provided below or attach a separ.tE letter your the s sac` If ou ar,., unable es and b the above date',„ please phone the staff cone; ,et noted b,;.e. If youyhave comments and this,, matter, contact soon as Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall rlvrd. r . Tigarcli, OR 97223 PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY 1.vvvv Ws have reviewed the proposal rand have no objections to it. Please contact of our office Please refer to the enclosed tter. Written Comments; Name of Person Commenting SCOTT 4 J , 226 -4211 EXT 2449 REqUgsli: Applleant,,requei„,(Subdivision preliminary Plat approval to diVide one riardOl of a-opiroxima.tely .65 acres into 'four lots b,ettireer, 5,070 and ,6,824 square feet. in size. ZONe: k CResidentialo 7 'Inits/asra) The tone 4,1,14,0ws single-family clef:ached residential units, pub11%,o support fac.iiies, residential treatmnt homes 0 farming, mantifattdred homes, home occupations, tamPstarY uses 0 and accessory structures among other uses, C/T! Set,t11-1, CI T REP:ESENTATIVE: Bill Mitchell PHONE NUMBAR,t 639-4008 ..--. STAFF bECIsION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING DATE OF MEItRING: ATTA.ctitEEiiirs VICINITY MAP JL NARRATIVE SITE PLAN $0 TITLE: KR -TCK , FOUR "D" CONSTRUGTIO. CAIdi � our M.D" Construction Co. OWNER: George Kre c'!t .0 BOX 1577 " ' 9185 $ '': Uur aam Roa } averton, Oregon 9`1075 f r Tl sfc a 0» .87x2 Applicant requests Subdivision !Prey imi ary apprev . to r F arc(e�i of 'aa piroximatf l.y , 65 acres into 'four�,{1oto betw den 5,070 an ee PLIOE RFviEW CRITERIA: Comprei: nsivE ";Plan Policies: 2,1.1, 4.2.1,' 4.4,' 7 6.1, 8.1.1, and 81,3„ COmouiVity Dev elopmf ?nt Code, Sfictions : 8.88, '1' 3;.92, 18.10, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 18.160, . and 18.164, i F D AT O X185 S Dur Baia Road (WcTM 25 . 11DC, • tai R--7 (Residential, 7 units /acre) The R.- zmne allows single.fait11y detached residential. units, public support: waCiiities , residential, treatment homes, farming, maantfacture 'dome ,. hone occupations, temporary uses, and ` accessory structures among other uses, CIT REPRESENTATIVE: Eil ]F Mitchell PHONE JMZ R: 639.4008 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION CO i NTS EACIfi TO S` A F -a�N., 199 S PLANNING COMNISSI0N DATE OF ifE ikINO: • T1 : , ....0 NEAR, T6�._ e OF FICER DA TE r HEARING: T.NE :21,OQ CITY b Txf� : � 30 COUNCIL DATE OF 1�EAICtZI�O. .'. NdA:'? K.. 1p�AN13iC�A1'rTryNT�CII'LANA�t NARK 3T i \x r°e . L....» S 1�:dJ J+ A EC 6 vier P PLAN ..,, OT�IF,�3. _ ATT�ACi4MINTs �_ o CITY OF TIC4RD, Tigard, Ol'egon F SEGO 131125 .SW Nall, PO .Box 23397' 97223:- (503) 639 -417. 1. GENERAL INFOR}M';TO PROPERTY AD DRESSILOCATTON o TAX NAP; AN TAX LOT X o. Z:',c� ` .1/`°",/ ‘ 79° °4 SITE SIZE __ ao k'" r PROPERTY OWNER /DEED SOLDER ADDRESS -4409 , PHONE ZIP , a...77es..% CITY APPLICANT* =f4e ADDRESS 15G ., ,.37'r.. CITY Od - ZIP 47 *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization from the (*titer or an agent of the owner with written aidt.4oriz :pons The owner(0) must sign this application in the space provided on park; two or submit a written. authorization with this app lication. 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners record cord mi` t subject Property re request permission to divide a w: A►r k..41 parcel into : lots between (number of lots) 0 and � c ° h�a ..� s(Itait. feet in size. O52OPi13P Rev' d 5/87 `4 it FOR STAFF USE ONLY OTHER CASE NO's: RECEIPT NO.:_ APPLICATION ACCEPTED DATE..._:. 1 • Application elements submitted (A) Application form (l)' B) Ownert. 0 gignature/41ritton authorization. C) Title transfer instrument . (l) ) Assessor's. map (1) ,�.. ,..(E) Preliminary Plat (pre- -app checklist) F) AppUcant's statei t (pre -► pp checkliRt) G) List oa! property owners and addressee within ` feet (1) t _C) Filing free' (I _ plus $i e-ChU per lot`: DATE DETERMINED' TO DP. CONPLE' FINAL DECISION "DEADLINE m .. _ 1i COMP. FLAN/ ZONE DESIGNATION. N.PeO. gumber °o Prelimina ry Plat AFprc'►val. Date: Final Approval bate: Plan-dii Et►g�i;neerixg Boarding i t4 anti :Ntitel er to :1, a complete . appl3.cat, attaehed Anfo fitinn. app i:cc loa ie granted. the p1i4 ant 11 a erdiee t1he' 'i:',$4. ranted; in' w ' ub eaWt to alll thhe c ndit on8n rind 'a:c�xda�nct�, tt► the �r�tearms n�id �. � � rov 1 i i� .1 of the a31o+ve " statenLente and Y the atat%.�o9 c;, , , u plot °attactutenta , and exhibit, , tra�nai tted 'lhe'ee i b..; a e t 'ue; and "'the . app ica� to oo ' acknowledge thOt . ainy permit- i lane d, ;based m r a p,p ,ication,;, .may be revoked if it .6 found titan ,;any suc se ®tratements are fal l¢. , re. ncontents of t' e . a l.ica i0, - ia,4:1,,d.,.., i , �1e ap,��ic�n� has read the �xtl��i �+�+ � r , t :e pa`l cie$ and , criteria, aid nadei etande tlhe requirOm r is ,I2o ap ii4' ng or dewiyia> g the applic iti ®m. DATED this 4z,day ' oi1WIlObl.PIIP „iIIt1Y1! ►4 •• •� ,� SIGNATURES of each o9ner (eg a husband amd wife) . ,of t IPROPEitit OWNER orgc &Clara;E.%reick 185 SW Durham salad i ard, Oregon X722+ Telephone: 684-9078 ENGikEER/SUR'VEYOR Harris- .McMou.agle Associates 12555 SW Hall jBlvd. Tigard, OregOn 07223 Telephone:, 6394451 REQUEST Preliminary plat a roWal f ®r the subdivision of the 0.65 acre tract into, four bets rangirig in site P � PP... from approximately 5,000 to 6,800 square feet. H . g • use is . ..p ., Courtly, . y The address of the existing house 918 SW �urha�n .toad: The xopearty is an .�r� the no side of DuTha Road near SW 92nd Avenue, City of Tigard, Washington .Oregon. 8 The it'0 (; .. is sholkt. T'a ;ot 7400 - - .. ®� ��sessor`s - g y 1V mum lot size 5,000 square feet �a1i�l �.es�dentlal pu datmur Mere is a Clay line'is of a - ient size aiia dept ten r sever is enclosed. City £ Tigard Water Department' Lended Ei a rathet tharA cthssiing ask,..s.ainAgat There is an existing storm line in ticAl and other private utility company services are available; 1 1ELIt 1S,HAf4Y PROF ! NAf1TE 11101110 iittor. it7 *kw Aa 'lease mote this will be an a formation mee'ting' on pre! altered prior to the submittal of the appkkation, to t16 x foal forward to .more spe ca ly discussing the proposal with e me a 0935, if you have any questions. our'D Construction will consider installing a fence. The style and height must be „ approved by the City of Tigard There is some question about allowing a fence to be built along the iigtit-of-way of Oak Meadow Lane. We will have a complete angkiet/ about the fencing issue at the next public meeting, . We want to save all trees that we can. The neighbor to the east (Lot 613) said he *you'd prefer that the trees next to his property be cut down. The other neighbors wanted to , save the other trees. 4. Street access will be from Durham Road, Several people expressed opposition to any ' access from Oak Meadow Lane, 5. The setback for each lot will aliAripiii with the CI of Tigard standards, The minimum rear yard setback is fifteen feet an, the side yard s are five feet. After all questions were answered, the meeting was adjourned at 7:45 pm. anus tot t re,' our :le trope, o the re f erenc d propert you plan to construct a fence oroun = the prop t not have this in . your plan now, min: request ' tl � ti one Our . recotnmen atioli' would be as follows: . 6 foot fence x 4 posts not to exceed foot on cente posts to be treated and set in 3;.;'foot 'holes, ;back with 2 inch minus graveNot yet it Concrete'. Fence . boards to be 2nd grade or bett,rcedar. Pence to be installed prior to ANY construction, • Pence boards to be nailed on horizontal rails' What is your plan for the existing trees on the property boundary line? What disposition is to be made Of the existing two story, home ?. hdre and what kind of street access is planned? How close (in feet) `ill the proposed structures be existin g Summerfield homes? �� r�rs� ✓�: e j' ," t crY, rrL - day of ut Irir It r� ,.■ S ghhatu�, Subscribed and sworn to, attained, before me this d aY of ' OF CIA``L CFA!. NOL'AY1 ft • CO,tlt,;J:i i,JN'N i 0UJi 05 Y CAMMtOSION EX liE$ JULY 31,1 D4 WiTHIN SEVeK (7) CAL DA DAYS OP Tae MIC414 POSTINOi RETURN THIS AFFIDA City of Tigard Nanning g Divisio 1,8.125 25 SW Hatt Blvd, Tigard,'` OR 9128 iog nt{alpO tntiai I Ilk an Wait:, ;mot said notices were etib En :were deposited on the date Indicated above h the lei �nsor� • e■°... ; a��.. i!i � �; postage prepaid the ar/ b Matt/ (P Fore me thi;z OFFICIAL e NbTARy pi Aio.Dra: �►� MT COMA 4i$$ QN Pii $JULY 111 1994 4ri s tii4 Glenn Coe itb1;it Hill Road ieb stopol, CA 95472 raid Williamson 7422 SW Virginia Ave. ?ortl ind, R 97219 Ltba Stanton 15810 SW Stratord Loop app Bard, OR 97224 Katherine Gibson 15850 SW Stratford Loop Trd, OR 97224 Deborah Kasberg 9105 SW , Durham Road Tigard, OR 97224 Rlath Nelson 5 15 SW Oak Meadow Lane acrd, OR 97224 Dorothea Stith 15935 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 "earl Day 15940 SW OA eadov Lane Tigard/ 'OR 97224 Bradley Bernard PO Box 23608 Tigard, OR 97281 a Stow 158%) SW Oak ! 1eadow Lane Tigard, OR 9922+ Martha tiro► "side 15870 SOak Meadow Lane T ;gars, 97224 5 SVV n a 'lhlarles acid' argaret lit,,eeding 5810 SW Oak Meadow n Riga !d OR 972 + Theodore',snd Vivian M ins 1.5805 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Allen and Raymond Winner 15520 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigivrd, OR 97224 Greg amid Rhea Gee lan 15795 SW Stratford Loop Tigard, OR 97224 Randall and Nancy Knipp 15805 SW Stratford Loop Tigard, OR 57.34 William and Katherine Putnam 9290 SW Durham )k ,ad Tigard OR 97 Clime and Maurice Albin 16075 SW 92nd Ave Tigard, OR 97224 John and Carol Raman 15815 SW Stratford Loop TTgar , O 97224 Jeffrey ai d. Judith Davisoizi 1$82; S''V Str tford T a i Tigard, t7 97224 Raymond and Geraldine Miller 16125 SW 92nd Ave Tigard, OR 97224 Ntark and Jam Poppert 16095 d iW 92nd Ave Tigard, OR 97224 Jane and "furl lios gli 10495 SW Melnore St. Portland, QR '97225 Leonard and Evelyn West 15820 SW Alderbrook Circle Tigard, OR 97224 .Eugene and Donna Macey 15840 SW Alderbroak are e Tigard, OR 97224 Robert arild Do" -res 15860 SW A►lderbrook Circle Tigard, OR 97224 Fred and Phyllis Strauch 15880 SW M,derbrook Circle Tigard, OR 97224 Mark and Leona Whitney 15900 SW Alderh room Circle Tigard, OR 97224 John and Ruth Dean' i5oae 15920 SW Mderbrook Circle Tigard, OR 97224 Donner and Bonita Fearing 15830 SW W Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Douglas and Loraine 11alsillie 15850 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 , dngeae and Eileen, Freeman, 1S3 SW Oak Meadow'LdeY Tigard, OR 97224 Adore and Dorothy Johnsoi. 4 SW Oaf: Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Ralph and Marilyn Greene 15910 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR. 97 224 Clarence and Jacqueline Cox 15920 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Arthur and Esther Marchetti 15930 SW. Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Carl and Daphne Mortensen 1594,E SW Oak IVIeadow x "rte; Tigard, OR 97224 William and Barbara Geier 15905 SW Oak Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Raymond and Louise Cetchell 15865 SW Oak 1 endow La , �lgard, OR 97224 Jerry Basinger and Donna Shigena) 1001 SW Sumniit View Drive Portland OR 97225 STkt�TF p w 4 iii February 23, 1994 Planning Commission Tigard City Council 13125 S W Hall blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Gentlemen: On � January 31st we atte dery a meeting with the dour D Construction Company regarding plans for a residential development adjoining our homes in Summerfield. Copies of their letter and our response are attached. We appreciated the opportunity to meet with the repre �,sere �tatives of the Four D p � prior ht of the wcir�., but frankly we were �onst�uctia �� :�p:� . n �Cnnz an riorao the commencement at this meeting. ,appointed with the vague information presented We are concerned because the property to be developed will not be under the conditions and restrictions of the Suntmerfield Civic Association (SCA). Therefore, there will be no control over the use of the adjoining property as far as landscaping, maintenance, animal and noise control and other restrictions that we are required to follow. This letter �� is to formalize our concerns directly with the Planning Commission.. We believe there are a nurnber of questions and concerns that were not adequately questions riis t iS rtherrore, we believe that the Four D Construction representatives addressed. _ � es were unnecessarily v- &g ue re g ardin g the specifics of the development e n t plans. addition n to the questions presented to Four D Construction on January 31, 1994 (see attached letter), we would request that the Commission ssion pay particularly attention to the following matters: 1.. Review all development pl. pis, insuring that ail required set backs, drainage general g q y the developer. . 5 are met la and zoning requirements 2; Insure that the housing density proposed by the contractor is within accepted (3) of hox�ies will be built, but are unsure of eta '�y guidelines, We believe three the oldee residence currently located on site. 3, We r e q i este that the eve o p e r cc n s ct a p rAV G y en�e before oc re cons t uc tion oegi,s so that die current uneYo�ne afforded a measure of privacy „ The ( fdeveloper was vague re ardin g this request, seerecomnended ene peccaftons attachment t # 1). 4: l d .hat the construction of the ° ='” de are ailso concerti° .. :. oil' Jae houses ��il block out ome ee ce ttaii Vatio eavertOfn `i Ore Clone is r spoase toy lter aced nu 4 it red y tinne ➢r i t tidtion, 4 la - t 7 n rs ad aunt :, o the reference i �a ro ert fin el' lily ty ,� ^ AiM s i e i • yp , { � , r , � 1�►'Q.�' ti e F1 4 r r- ?'1 ��, ' y .1«7 `f i r ii ere, sted in ylu °ViIat tpe' off; rue.tures�►.eln �anne, 5 ,r You ■��1 ,yf�, truc enc ley■ p' (y the ,, &Y . �, If yore `'. ;77J0 YY. °",., pl .o t ;�. cogistrLtct °'�eXic4'" do not have this in your .plan no no met d be ue fur recannmenatxa ` wont gas foot fence , b x 14 posts not to treated and set 3 1' t ; oles, b e ed sts �t� be �� .p 4 , with 2 , xncu minus ve1, Nt Set In �,,< C < oncrete. Vence +,-bards to be , 2nd grade or better cec►ar. Fence to be installed :; prior to �. Y construction, e. ,�. Fence boards be nailed on ; o zo ' � .v � the r What plan for the existing trees � along i y �. v+�h�it is ion p{ ,, _ w � . :. of tile '.e� ist�u boundary line? What thsiposition is to, he , made o two story home ?: � kind of street access is' plane d { � �,, ��e and what 7'.tovi close (in feet) Will the proposed p,,. existing Sumrnerfield ho i►es? nor Ple se ;note this will ;)0i'asa information ee> on;: altered prior to the su irnittul 'of the application to I look forward to moa`c Specifically messing ther.p 0935,-t t you have ally que tions. Sincerely, Ds CITY OP PRE-APPLICATION IFE=NCE N is"( ti! l�cH CSC. 19 igicrs dawwwwwwww phones , ,4 / - f Fktone i ?ROPERT ' LOCATION ADm $s TAX MAP & TAX ApF: r.+e,ra 8 t4:---%4 4 04'0 e.' n:i t�&OES�3:d A�CbF�ICA2Id�►$a `s y s A� °--°�� - .s.7i�.dLi... } �%� /.5" % NOMIIMsm,.rraniIir, Plt'EOPOSM. DESCRIPTION ; �xcr •e: Q /of EA.) d44 ate 4,4. 14'1-5' w�� +o.n.wG..roi.+rnir�.n.s.rw.rw ... . -. i. i4i!�.snr ®�r:.u...■■.e.6vii. a " �im.+e•.. m� 4re.iowuiiq++•n.MMnirwir .iioriw�rwr+ifsl�inri�l+u...� .: 4cwr.bw+.i.i. "irlror+..`"wuu+.+.e COMItEEEENSIVE PLAN VESXGNbTSO~N: TONING DESIGNA,',CId Ns P a i l �G C.: Z. v •, "i �� CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM 4.1 agantPERsOash, ZONING G DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL 11.7,'QUIFIEMENTS A Minimum loo ®idea s.. ii�cll %�.�r : f tie,. 2$�� lob width: �0 ,;..s S�° + F s- Setback e: front # 6 sine ......E___,, ft, .' rear p- . garage f corner __. ft. from street. Raximua. mite coverage: 1.1 t tC*7. t e Minient4 land:leaped or natural vegetation area/ "a() Ili Maximum buL1dLia height: ITTO LOT DI a SXON P O1�TS c yu d react .irou4 e_tniacr -,ia nd i-ti�as (I --oi; created a s P of a it `i `h -+ ,e-- , a 15 feet o frontage or have a` minium mini! 15 fob WLtc acaesa Maximo lot &o at to tridth ratio of 2.5 .to 1. J SPECIAL S ��3,"i' 1tV'B+8 „' 4 i 1�f..b oC a ` c�.hs'rikikciS a..iarsai�..cmgsw ® vrritiutitardrai.4r��actih� litri side, stnten .ty' ... rItkilt Lott 10 feet ue Alti1Leh asreaa® s s ' a rd' .. . Laird let line' 10102 U ..1f) , Cott ` e . 3' :L. tastily 'risisMiatkilAti Wilding eittlite'air.lbett $ 8 , • kcceaaory ®'l 'u '„4...44 .. . ! _- ' A4 00, . � 1, *te lode then 2.5 5 &c ell in taise..ethi 5 "Co ®e k 4,01t 'ilk; rear let line Acceeieory structure up to IWO .051. ` d o parcels of at least 2.5 acres gime -» See applicable toning districtetbriks for primary s a re®. -t Page 1 P�f ad1LDXN HEIOfr3T ptt /I ►I ®NS • _.. _,+... ' .n efft , 5 S-4.5 sinor I LmUm hoi _2t f .ir R and -12 none° feet in tine it-35' sr f 00 feet in the it. -40 zone rwb.o Never i. less L a reist Maximum _boi.sght of 2-1-7/-stories . ot 25 i is 5 or R -4t) zone provided loner 2^� /2 c iozies . r 4 a I ». d.*-- � ttie standards of Code Section 14844.492.)413,2 01 afire {ac: 1 , RESIDENTIAL CALCULAT=o ® fast ire cPpaaent Code Chapter 18.92 specifies that th Residential Unite allowed on a pail tLC t1ar site may be calculated by developable land by the minim number of dividing ua feet the n area of the dwelling unit au specif i l applicable square feet ,� iae� per dwe the apgJl 9 g calculated by subtracting the �coni.n e9esi atio,�. Net development area is following land area(n) from the gross site areas 1. eeneiti.ve Lando areas including ithin the 100 year f 1plaiin ing 25% 2. 3e,�N 4 • L - Slopes e p r tpagewaye d Land ated. €o'r park purpoeee P 1" h -of-way All land to be 055v1.4ed for private sues i(includeE Vii.^ ewa e thr� � RESIDENTIAL DEDISITY~ s1 uat Se.— 4Ce `i The City of Tigard a � e a Reeideiitia1 Density Tr�?tlefer of up tO 25% of the unita that covild o . Ise have been developed on Sensitive lands areas ],ieted iLn (1) above whh�ioaay be applied to the deVeloptble portion of the site (Code Section j2030) ;it reepan ®IA ti.tta sf the a • lialA for a rtaidetitial development n to provide a detai calourlation tar pe application P �., �+ .. sit tr�tn ®fe�tta the .tte�i reeideiiti.,; denality and the real stied density RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TPAH11S TIt1 d d in a editing dintipict, astir property wittd4 LIDO feat of a designated a ..till ` not be al.los�ed hemming. P _,. a deir+�it Ater t�;n Su't5 isbed at � !+�! 9�i� d�il�li7Jp®d 6,G � dOelpteheneilre Plan seeigaatiOd not ) of tatie a jaoent mil. S1,18 ASS RiticetRINOVOS savior .partitionti ® a eoler a sae f >°O+ti of all Iota created atnrat be ornted .pox eater aeeibilitlr. bas .� .:.se it 1r: ,.fie that ga 4_ a ._tG!lt uhi.at� filet ®roninee ..Col -� . - e.' wr...rww.iwrC � L+f�t t i � �11�t�8t� :. . •' I ♦ . _ L.Wit ,� a e ie. eaet+eet axe` .: '1�t" • ., , '. , i o +... i 1` e requirement" . Ttae 4�r...a�. ®� dial , e�ceid�►t VM 9/f a ei.� fr�a tine �aola� aid Say be 'approved for the follorwiaag area001xe1 ssot* (tl,On Mi:'tb ZI tl+aaL'eeiai . 9f, taste west or north elopes steep4t than 2Ot. Off- .site ehade.,:eour. (a rar a ®� d� eteat�.on; .- ®-site shade RL Urcee (vQgetrati on) ., tg®pogr&phg) tt,.t�"� 442024 ' aNee`" d 4 n allow I% ei1a4e foi,tfie fnllw upti crio;43., o )reithett • • 7) a 410kfkt-4. 44'' 1 Tie,1144: ;fitt*tel ;44004 ii.'itic*iittteientr:',4„0,Lici.4)4t :CheiOld '; be ,eiteak&et,or,,,adliiitted:iint.'„ ncluded in the • ' / The nerth,..eo ith int dithennien and ,frolat IM 'line. otientatiOn2 of eaoh propoed lot PtOte0t.601:, 2010 building ZLne and,-,i610Yant. kftiliaticr*16600 't if ak)iidable ' 'or the pu#pOn€4.6f identifying tteen,ireittel to eatfat*UPI-040-0.1111b11.- ma 0 shotd.ng aitiatin4 tree a' Which are 3 (..1"'44.4140t )1, 4413e 6 t‘ldhee diasietak at ,P* point 4 feiatt, abG gtadei, inap afisil diasketake &nd ea, ' az1 a tatement ileclasisig that they are -to,ne zetained; And • d. 66Piek Of' ell:‘'primati., teittittione ieI.ating o ette004n. 0a04 deenitY ire an The design • thilenterieticil Of ot' 'developed I 1 11 1 ite 1,0 64'wititteette ein ettikin# tbe ,)1,"Ontil TOta1e-,0001,1ecti',,of the hOtil4eir, houee tiiienteitibnmaXiiiinte4 senth 4.144to: tea. :itChieve tlitat ''dao nay takititia theiHieOptiOicitngt 04 Vrtitedited Solar kitiligino Line: oriented to within 30 t,egillOtt Of a tiik,etint,A460:1-?, a taininatai distance of 70 feet frCai the. outit property line, told provide a Lnimum 4ietanoie from he nOtitheilitaosa-4- bUildable-hiintidaiii'Of the t14.ib1e0t;'.10,+4.,061,,:',',,, north littliterty ,3,incto Peitfcitiriartdo Optitnind Vitiate ere tWee perfOOnintictle otkienn • , , ntilited4 The first *Alan Etailft,$1.ttal/kii holt,* to be Orietateddtbil# degree* o an iiaistkieitt skid Cro:i4 1..0i4Fou4,t lewt 61.111v, Mitoi' fltitireiti 00nth eai1 gitotett4M th&t tatt, --Ise 3Ans, end rige4 diatilLtt f�ot f 4� zoOif fat* tsoutti and be ittioteated liedo.ithaez ag. Etete9.2.-W-121MOIVASZT-TataLanit, teletatmlakiLts--046144g-telatMag • ttm f ed acet<oaa►b�.Je�i q :� `•"" " p+�r 11 ,11104 .t. w_Eirking' ipaoe p'B;r dw iii'ug. trait: .e a qu ‘ r� n epacee icred spaces 11,nt be dl ig* ate d 014 d aa0ion e tape at2� 'li l be', d a'pnetoned as Ol to r ce1arfce►►es, ' . ftyw it, .x 15 r: it ing & e�aef'' `ehall pirovi e . app l �9s %e1�r; led pereon pa>~4.n4 Spaces. o earr to. 5% as c - Apact ''„ paces. ) Sta#dariA. ' . x ocated and dimensioned di umber: of disabled person paw arkinq otall a t naiona, are ctan Act (ADD) A 'handout ,.® available' Space eyml of of ll be painted on appropriate aim shall '`Ix :posted. kln7 3.xag a g spaces to be :provider, .arsc walk, en, the ted by the ameasAicana with Di �1 BUPFEZLNG LND SCREENING In ceder to increase priveoy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noist► or visual impacts between adjacent deeelopientss , especially 'between different land users a City requires landsc&,..1 buffer areas along certlf in mite perimeter -f. P' toPieed buffer areas are des frirhed by the tile Oode in ties ms o width. Da »s; r . < trete must be ,,eccupiead by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen tsItMs shreebs and must also rot, .evaa a balance betwtnen vertiar ci, and horirorttal plantings. Site obset Lag screens or fence s may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Vie. The required buffer are z.'i7 y anly be Occupied by vegetation, fences, 'utilities, and , walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may found in Code Chapter The r ired tuf ter widths which are applicable to your proposal area: Gl ft 4, along north boundary 2_ ft. along east boKadary ft. along ��a ath boundary ft. along weld+ �':sa4>nc� y .�.... � ad 0,;,14.4.1 S Ltoc�f oa..k-l�q Ir. In addition, . Sight `f obe strin screening ie� kker uired along -0-1 _ a e. ..,a .�..,... vy�.. STREET TREES ``V•.. Street trees are required fat all develop uente fronting an a public or private street to well as driveways Which are more than ' 100 feet in Length. Street trees, must be placed either withit the public right�►f,Away or on private pedieertv Within alas: fd st of the rit`Tht-.of '.wa7 boundary. Street tree.. must have a minimum caliper of at leant two inches when met ured four feet above grade. Street trees Should be Spaced 20 to 40 feet apa.tt dependinq an thaif brmnchi ng Width of the tree at maturity. Further ittforme,tton. ist re t t trees may be obtai ne ', from the Planning ._n ss rat• ®EAs3 affect Tree MrOv�•... _.Y�v1s•OO• h.IY. le��. Jl.n ..fir SIGNS sign permits must be obtained prior ` to s to afros of any Aga IA the g�► p Y City of Tigard. A Gai!LdDeliness for S ►.= Pe nits handatit 9.e► av tt ble upon request. ditL iiai a gn area eight may be ' P eron i od if ti �lewed tua� of r d�a apmrett review application. �terta�i��1 y Sigh cede B - . ' a' pl cati of ca be filed for ; .�sriew before the earingtai Offies . arossai '12414016.1.14, �.. SENSITIVE LANDS seine a1 lfe il® for dev due o ass wire .1t.S 10� eak ti ial�.y • • (ode, Cha�ltterr' 18.84 7„ °�-�*� &!Lone �cor . i+cti ,a i3atl'natural ». . y.. �,`4�1y�f �a�te ., ` . ^..�. , .s, p J j S��"-et .e . . ��. �IIJf: `i.¢,..�rJ;' ® � .. a,e� ^�I�'s fa ®. of 25 � � or on u�lle g cunda ' = Staff .^ 'sv, �, : att ; O peel � nita7 L.,lentilitt ssea�titi o .. �s• �® a.�a�s at .t,� 3LlL+�, �'ik;�e��11r*: �r 't On 1e y. Y p y &tide..areed and dge, Wander-Led is s. 'e 'iC af the a nitii,tinsc of s ss lti�,re lands must bs� AeA tadj, ,:, %° ear aneefriaa the $shit! u u.vs..�..w..vr..ar...ewnrre.s y,e n ti4 om R Dl�.acs►® seabmtted with the devd�las�n�. „a,�}�ais�ttiQ Page S w b Chapter 18.84 also provides � r lations for t b nee, H ►; '` � ide a or modification of metsiti a tondos ��' del te • t_i- f tied vlt� g --g a a,�. Y� Wist cagese dedication of 1O®-y ea r fl plain areas to tb® City nor � : k open space awe ti `appl�.r,:at�. a coed L' io0 of the app Eovell of a dace °I�►n ADDX'TXOI'NA% CONCEBM8 OR ' O$ 4E 3 S1 0 K e 0,44,444-- a 4e4a5".5" +et r 040, ate. �„. .' eg. .77.7747t -twit alcecc) G7tt/ LcJO 4eC `Ftt;vr� 'coo wi IA,* 'el !3-ut s 'eJf e) `A (7 P.e, me r, t.1 ems. (0 s• PRO DM* .� r�aJ. e Administrative etas , - ® Ott ic :r. .- ..--,. before the Land Use Bearing �•sblic hearing planni.�rn�r /�t1��n3.t3eie�n• _.",: hea rii 4 before - 1td ' Commission Public n,� o isoion with the pe±blio hearing bef��re t1ha� naming -� �povi,�cil. a recommendation on the proposal to the C1.4 making . c3 ". An additional 'public hearing e�.all be held by City Coun ��h�� C t APPLICATION �UJBY'EI'%CAL PROCESS a 3.v nio`� staff r sal`ar at All applications mat be acca�py ��;.... Bail. f f ins a s- ...• . tDepartment nttCi3P it ,tit the Community Y3e�elc�pm�n c£ '. E'eau CgUx1��l „� hgat p� bl�.�ation� ®ubm►titad '� J a � n'd . O • aae mnc m. , � returned. Applications - .- tit a 4t30 P.M. on Thursday reday w 3 be etched for processing �i tlie folio vlittre k° a ►pplicatiO .e . �., - on _ der da • �' � y I NI-5r iicwo t a dit E,t; • / t c( Adole 444 0‘10E Ravi tiak- zhal .Ewa . fa, [sue ag. is jit• �..,W,il am�a .. p beta ehcnald,,,,.�$ ;�,�c�Pa�c�One � G aeYn '� ' .�� ,....--ch os: �l�s�iraa deoi ®�.l:�= �.,�:. ��:� ttaac��nt '� the • �•a ha3.1�- tttit• le �. eu?.U._ unto} pled �. "1 A1 at.ea> tai and will g�Eci,a e: 1la 'Ate Planning ��.eleixna . the application a d WM det e whether as q ,, i" idat n . is G ;ce.�i,;�rs of .. . .,.... .; anal: �%t -.uif �b;i��► "�. �'-'g tin het6 within 10 days of 'the . l g Of t • . t1 .tit d applidant ! add..tihil i tiona ce ad\ , mattioAkitls are needed: ' • y The a aa 't e 'ul deixA itS9 r � y.P.a. , a • g._�:. e 8a� ed betting *mkt' co 6✓Clttr a o i� hy � ,�c adti�er � ► � : ' ir tusditiotol tide e f � Pi a e i J5 s-.) oudbbeadbyt aptieui . M �iO�a � �p dly • 45 . GO 4alrit y pptlica q ai • a0 (AV V 0 Weft:, J r :' i . . . .. - ..,11,.;:`.`;',,;'...C.,:; '...,'....• :.::',,.,.....:, ..'.,:.'...' :... .','....':.. -'....,'•:,*':::".;,....,',•-:•.',....""..:.•::."':'::.."'.',...':':.. • 0. a 11111,4 �i; Eu*LXC WAdi ITIE The 'purpose' of the pre- application cocferende is to: (1) identify' ,applicable: Caeprebonaioei Plan' pOlLiOles and ordinance rI ark. y' to raxnideit staff' an rt+uoait teaomot�en *. cbnc'e:r/ • � � � >3� � Y' r daps on specified and (3) To review the Land Use. Application »►iew ee with, the apwa U ent and to id!:dntify who the final decision making anthoz?itJ shall be for the application. The, extent of Eeceeeaxy' public i aprove ;ante axad dedicat a `w% .dte required Of t'he' applicant will be r udedi by pity staff and subject to epprova .l by the r appiropriate authority., There wall be no fine/ re o mendetion to . the decision making auth4ariiy on. behnif of th3 Ci t1i ata„,ff unit 1 all coucer nod anti *g agencies,' 'Oily Staff and. the public ha sh had an opportunityl opportunity to review and :Comment, . n the applieati�on. The for4Owing , , 0©umaento are a pr ecti∎an of intpraveme.nt :'related requirements that may 1 e roquirred as « Bend i tiio , of development apprcva . for 1:01,1r ptopoeed' project• i g toot. a d`A g c.n .The®ityr et aseaai and re it ec t t land: a be de __sated to the Ali a : abutting J`ublic ri ghte-of -.way to the IJ:Ltimate f unct .onai street a"plaseif iceit Ple right - of -way :width dle epeci:f led by the Cominanitl, levelopment Code; jai 2') for the creation of new --� '. ei Z.4 * ' °'7 e�kxet�ts. �a�- P�s:a1P .may . Approval of a de�reiopment application for this requ g way dedication for: 1. to feet: frost centerline. 2. to feet from cente2 L ne. .3 • . ter..' to m — feet Metro centerline. 't � � ms 1. street £m P roveaents w L9. � `neea Bery 2 .. . ... . Street iMpg.‘ovetants win be necessary ..alon e&oala ;,, . Laude �' e � .. ¢n 3. _ Street imprcov nilt . .n pa p ion a fc^urr:b a Wit.. ., , Storm : d, ceaterr;l.lacteaz� lua k'�� .uast��.�1at ... � ta�troe de a edda placement appropriate h t thEngineering r Wit) : a idyl fie wide sidewalk (sidewalks say be reqUired to 'bs wider. On arteriale or major aolle for etrore: s, of 1, t thin anntreil. Buei nnaa a bietri ct'r ilfecetAark Oxtreet ei ®e etonetlighte, and as tWo year litre' etla ght ., . filet in ecae sate', why . •+ t lnip'rOteinent.s or istictitogiatty iinprovements arm net cuttiontIy practical, the :she lisiproVements.etty be • def Z ':such swat, a condition ®f del:el a ent approtral say be ripedified n u >y (e to execute a non- , remonstrance e . eee h Wai e& t)z.e pr me y yak" h right to remonstrate e egainet t'taa teriaation +6f a iOcat a nt diettiot .t s ed to improve: q Page a 4I ors Y ;1! Peelle tart rl, Wa e%bikewa. s s sewer line i�o this prey i5anita'�_ The neatest sanitary. O Sewes� Q ich is located ire, ...., , 7.12...7 ,inch line t�, to .Aa►�itarY setter. 8t is the The prrapccea development mat be co s cited the p��pme�l ,evelo d the a ong developer's reeg�tnaLbip.it�' � extend ,� d ®el ®pmerst s,ie ° tO TS'' rp r Su 1 s The+ A Water Dietrit (Phocles �'�dt� no � site. The Di ®trite: •1L stater eereice in • the area of this si 1 for ;dour thouldes pub regarding water eupp y should be contactCd for infor[iatlon reg proposed development. Fire and Rescue Dists� ice. Qntact:an ,�l,re� psrestoctit��ts Tun3.aL3.n Valley R es� within the city of lxoh a ro�rl.dleA �� ® tadted far .�.nfo �.• ,- _- �dl,.ng the 3� ° d rotection serviced with n other 645 953' gyp► � Tigard. - ^�h® t�ietr�.ot should dra�te, oar stems, the •need for Lire by e adeeiea�cy of circulation BY ��'�. � quest .ons related to fire protect erst• tithe Rg iescy pe its s Stdrm ae ear i apravestee23t43: 4 5 jP.M0ATER. QUALXTY FEES 11. ®h has agreed L® ied Ses es age Agency has •estat ed. and - ,.he City lad agreed edito TYr ,nif ement Regu . Ra��fo� °cc:, RenOl�xt#.on X60. 9tl -4S Sctface Watt �'►ag faciLlitiies. At the ilea the conatxeactioa of on -4eite wate4 alityC e rer�r�a Offered .. � oppartt�t y � the applicant away _ � reeolntio e�, an ruction of such a The a13�,Ac�' ®tien of the City, b^� offer' il.it,�• fan; _ +, a fern 3:n lieu n the comst alit facility sonar or the payment �,e�,�uire® the c ®netr�xcticn of a ti�ater. quality r The fie t ha11 be bailed dp n the enovint of v4evaous Sur�faCef oL sx fee e �,�.. shall -be $2$5. dDO. Toe city 2,640 �- r.�,`e •feete tsrmain® if to �eefs�a3f �geep� of Tigard shall de city d ®r a facility Ilse C� y Shall be conatrudted war- ailiewNirni, TRAFFIC Z PACT FgSS 4) �+t�! /1 �: °��,a�e ��iE3� ��t Fey (T n tY '� lle ' feed cites . . ear s lhan 6da13�'aTh ► Fee .. . sh® �'saff� . � s �� ,��, tine cevelaaace. 1, nt .'panted on t d sbcJ 1u to . 'a,,, fee ibae ce tponeth he rsyl ite�a The itch are prof � rep' tul* I', s the ] 0ed to ..� of Tt I bi on . ,.. p �� ®� fry. �*� peop0�4e'd b1B43 Of u e of the pr'o th agen. �e Site c.aa.'� , . n►3.t li.teu ate��"� .. _ � _.,r. eral: use �ar�ed f� a— , ..... , the laid, Sated at tih® time rf i nil a.. to be fe _ Allowed ®. ted c i' taucee, past of T ' y t the jeeuanoe at an oc�xps t bafettalao 'ti1h payment 0,000,064 until occ WO TV iii ceea tic' : p®�i�t►.e �� MY age aiciOjacth that_ t a igrad :plan; also require Sit tl a a xl4.0ani1 'e St a 'typical. floor plan 't @�� each, 1+x`4. This flood Cpl a►' . indicate the e1evatLono 'tit, ` `he four corners of that ,plan along � tt1 ele?�ratloa,® 'it the ,court of each lot. ltd 'I £NGIITHERIfG :DIVISION( PROM' 639 -4171 co 4 MGM EXHIa 'A' D rectos ` s Decision to t'1 ing LLi$^AV f • $235 o0OAVEA costa Planning C` issI IHearizn$s Off . to Council . $2 ®' + transcript BLASTING PERMITS .v a e . r . • . REREl M E P LA N PROCESSING Conditional Use Review . • . • . . tit r 'Text only, Map ,. . :. ----1C�i�� y - . • ° r . s r. , r o ... •. e b y1, , y CONDITIONAL USE P OCSSi*G r aCXItTE SETBACK:STANDARDS r r u r r • r • . $ P0 uVAr $ 305.00 !LIMBIC ✓"ERL"K q/ G r r r o • . w . ®i a £ tait . . . . . e . • ■ . - $ . 5VrOY � r HOME OCCUPATION r . . • $ 5503 000 1 aT iE. i ATr0tsI OF c0M4UNI 9f DE "Q CODE W. y ' ve o ,..:, - part ca • pARTITI©tt %�esde nta'a.l end. o ' $235. 00 i LOT /INS ADIUSIXENT w u +$607.10 p I) V s PEOCFZl O $500.00 ncePtual and detailed plan review • - • SENSITIVE LANDS Wetlands/Steep slape s/Deant ga C. . • r . • $ 5 2 0 . 0 0 Flood lain . . • $230.00 DE tEPT1Ot4S w a • SIGN Cw•yy��O YY V IGN i EL MXT 7 �i r • I� 10.00 C 0 -24 sq.: ft.. • . . . • ° . . . e e . • , .. dgG7Ca�� 24-100 sq. ft a e r . 1 . w . . w + 35.00 . • .- • e s . / 1 a w w . . 1 • 10d� + sc . fit. . $ 10.00 each sign TeMPOra y s x9ns VE b E DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Under $10,000 . . . e . • 80.00 10.000 $ 99.9 9. � . . . . • $155.00 $ $15.00 499,999 . . . . 9 . r ■ 1 . S00, 000. - $'999,999 • . . . $415.00 500, e r $/.000,000 or 'bmoxe . . . . . . . over $1 'million -t0 w_ '- °- ' S eaiVISIOtIeR� Subdivision Variance, if n',ede .- Director' Decision . Special exemptio /NOf ratit TREE REMOVAL PERMIT • VACATIONS Streetas and public access . . ■ $520.00+ $1 per $10,000 $2000.; --- $415.00 4- $S f 2.ot $1.05.00 -' In r e a s r $ S0.041 . . O •O Y . i. e . $. _ ... • v'..��+ • tllttlNCG ri a,liki. istrative ,.. • ZOt CtIAME R AATY Less diA0 id. a xs. O 4 1Q ae e ® *dee 4 . 4 4 . Zdag titANGE tR t; ss t% 1.0 aces w e WNE ORDINANCE Ataituparr trot 1 N p Ni -G to e m . e . 1001 of highest Owning' ter L` n ■ • $300.00 deposit - a cd uaa: costs charged . $80.00 • $230.00 ., . $524;000 .� .. .. • . .' $G25. O • . '$52®.0° APPL3ICfiT�I q .. [�sailn fee Plus tot 4if ail` adds " " 'J ita��l t1,ann�.ng Fees �cel��Cedl QiC/Iie] .�CSl P items on the checklist belok} er a require f thw succ@ssful completion or, your erpiication submission riAuirentent3 hecklist iden fies What ,,k3 relfquired • to be submitted with uur. application. Thi i sheet apIplicatian. See your application for further explanation o cell Planning At 639 -417/ nA "k f BASIC MATERIALS Application forte ,(1 C,titly),. 0w oerr1,'s signatur ,✓,written authorization Title'- transfer' .nstrument Aszes'sot"5 !nat1' Plot or site plan F) Applicants statement (H) F lling 'fee ($— �. SPECIFIC MATERIALS S Information r�l A) Site Inforanatun ��mc�'" �NO: of copies ) . 1)�ici,n� ty °gip 2) Site size & dimensioht 3) Contour lines (2 ft' t 0-10% or 5 Ft for grades' > 10%) rses, and pond 4) Drainage patterns ca�u� 5) Locations of° naty ral hazard are is including: a) Floodplain areas b) Slow i n excess of 25% c) ilnstable ground d) Areas with high seasonal water: table e) Area s . potential �i th severe soi l erosion 4.ocatio of reVsouete� are s asasho on the C011tpeehentivt, � Map itive0t4e1 inobid : a) Wildl :i+fe habitats.[ b) Ifittlattidt 7) (Afloat site feat+> res: •=� - a) Rock: Outcroppings b) 'rees with 6� + ca ail r it tasa�red A ) feed. I+ from elettrnd level, Location' of Waiting a te°uctures *hob" !tikes 9) Low "tHivaae and ;ty of on e:: off ite Boa ise {'so�!Ill es 10) tit iii ting utilities and ' seaaents 11) Lo anon of ex isti ng dedicated gad ri. hty-o l s :ti ps�L A � JI r' ti. .4t PiN�Y 7B O� of� copies +. +� Y�migsRYY'I prop. OSed site surr ndi sj� ies Ix =',j` 2) Contour line eiter"1�'als �ti Y. Lr �, x, y+;{ i.Y • {, !N ' �LA+1 location, amensions allf,;,0WW1e9 of all: a) tititting & platted stOtets C otherr public +way and eaaeeiients on the site Lidd ors ad jo ning properties APPLICATION, ' F LIS' " = .Rag+ a- ) b) Proposed streets or Other 1 ubl.ic ways & easeaaen on the site. c) : Alternative rO_t,tts of dead, end or proposed' streets that require future extension he location ,anx1 dlis;ensiof of: 'tat ,) Entrances and t'kiits On the site' b) Paaric i.g and c r'!culat zon areas c) Loading and services' Oreas d) 'Pedestrian and bi4;ycle c r cula�t �. ) outdoor common, reaas, f) Above ground utilities n �A A'i. es al S) The loca4l,nony ra. � ��, �ta, a) exiting permanent sti ucty ryes, improvements, utilities and easements which are located pn the s4te ,a,d on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site b a Proposed structiure's {, i npr�oe ee''nts e utilities and easements on tiler site 6) Storm 'drainage ,fal‘tikitieq and 'analysis of downstream .conditions 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be laarrdscap4 9) ,The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime Prevention techniques 10) The location of mailboxes i1) The location of all sttroctur&' and their +rientaation 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement. agreements Gradtnq Plan (No, of Copies.____) The site deloelopment plan shall include a'leading plan at the same scale at the site analysis drring3 and shall cootaln the following infor tion: ion and extent to which . .ny will take 1) The, i4�cat 9I� and of year lace , � � talbli�at.•ion ro seas, lode ��ata ®s p indicating general ctontoar liner s and soil. s p p� it is proposed to be done. 2) statement from a e ist0e4d engineer supported by *ta factual substantiating: a) ` Subsor^faace exploration tion and geotechnical ehoineotri it „ e000 `t.. ., ty + ° a i.t P 'sewer as'4 ,tor ft b) Tt�e y�z�,a ArainAge'54evtto primp ►salx c Vaal 'all prOblettt. .will' be mitit jaated aid they tsi l'l etiti`gated 0) Architectural ®rri s :0100 of copies Th a site developMent plan proposal. snail include the s tie f , 'i) ' G %nor plans lnatatirr ootaage of All structures proposed for use :on site: and 2) Typical el evat oT .4raWi n'9$ og each sucture • l N pe Plan" �No of ct,fpies `�` a' �) L.aa�tidacaa The landscape sce P shall ►fie airs at tae same 3,1e , of Site analysis plan Or a :l rger staler if necessar' and sty indicate: 1) ,Descr"ig tion of the irrigation s ster'm o re aippli i Location and height of fences .. h'a�iffer�s � �creen�:ri ) APOLICATTOW CHECKLXST Page 2 C C3 (,3 C] Ca t E]' C' 1 1 3) Location. of terraces, 'deck ��heitters, ' play areas '' $ $on open spates,rr ra 4) Location, type, ' %,3� a and : specaes f, �a�i�(sta�ng proposed! ,plant,'ter�,al "die iaai0 plan sha'1lnclarde a n aarratiwe• mach addresseS's 1) Soil Perri.wi94ions.' f,..,.' 2) Ero$ion. control natures : that will be use'a: C' p r . Orltw a; ` S; ,gA drawings' than, tie subs• ittod xn' �:cordance' with' � pter• 10.11.4 was thi Code .as part of Site peQelopment Pevie0 Or ,prior to obtaining a Cuiildfiang Permit to ca nstriA t the' sign:. • ; c genes ation ettitoate 1 Pr loll re itioy or of line ad °Ustrent ma4 shr�wi , (No, of Copies ) s 1) The owner of the suba ect parcel. ... 2) The owner's authorized agent ". 3) The map ;scale, (20,50,10 or ZOO feet=1), inch north arrow; and date -( ) Oescra ptt a on Of parcel location and boundaries 'S"" 5) '�,cation, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within mnd adjacent to the parcel 6) . within Location of all Permanent buildings on and! 25 feet of all property lines Citc 7) Location and width of all water courses . '�' " 9) Location any itf i ' .' or grater caliper at 9 M.�..��ati�-�n of an trees w 4 fleet above ground level 9) All Slopes greater than 25% (4 10) Location of ex.... ,ng utilities, and Utility easement 11) Foe l r land which creates a public street: a) The eight—of- y location and width fie''" b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street strip �C 12) Any $Pi�li� reserve able deedregts^ictxons k3) Evidence that land partition will not preclude 4fficient future land division where app1ieatqXe -11'7''' Is t . i Plait eV nd. data A inA �bd��.s�.� pli, .. _�_ 1) Scale equaling 300501.0 Or 200 feet to the in b ° i and !tatted to one ph is per sheet -.2) proposed Witte Of. 'the, subdivision � ) Vicinity ahaing p ra � rty s eettot i onshlpii Qtr .tied 4 sria�de�esses4l�el.otreetsrs �� = � ' C7 ' •th.� r- r • curve � � er � desi.,... a . saa litable duel ®p►er°, Qn� a�ee . u o ► G' . 5) Sato of ,app1i.c tit ion ;. ,- C 6) Boundary ` lines of tract to be su bd1.vnded uba lla or oie • t of e° .cord � C�" `�' 7 j .des ° of; xd ja�ea�i i ▪ Hers of ad joinin "parcels of W siubdividled •and :, 4, 14 g) con o+ur Itnet related to a e tv= st fished ikr�-�61...-,o` • k at 2 tE10t tnterr11'a3 tot ' 0-40tD t *det 1"etatte►" ' • • , APPLI4flTt0fJ e 3 fee pu s's xLCatiora, ,type -end size of al of$the following :(i it rin :aid adjacent "to th prmppos *ubdluisiOn) : is C , ubli at 'private eatetaon ts ( b) Public and pr"aiirate satntarg abed stae+ sewer fires c) oomestic water mains incleadiing fire . hydrant ts III d) or poia�er' tteliphche transiss,�losa ;Ames "' (50,000 volts or greater) e) Watercourse' f.) Deed re'serr !actions for° parrs open space, pat ya and other • land : encUO i.''ances C ' `,..fipproxIgstite pl��` arw; ;prof i, Of; proposed sanitary and storm sealers: with gradv,,s Lana pipe .I sizes '1nda, a 11) Plan 3 'the protAised water; distribution, system„, showing pipe saes and 'ths location Of Volvos an fire hydrants. 12) APProxiaate cent4lrlire profiles showing taws finished grade of all sts�eets including ,street tension for reasonable distarrce beyond the limits idf'the promised subdivision. 1 Scaled cross sections of proposed Istreet right' - ft ga y t 4) The location of all areas subject t*, inundation o'r' storm watery overtl bw 15) Location, width a r, direction of flow of all eater x courser and drainage Ways 16) The proposed lot configurations, approe ate lot dimensions and lot mbers , Where lots are'.'to be used for purp)3es other than residential, it shill be indicated upon,. such i d lot cir 1 �) The location of all frees with a' diameter, 6 inches or greater measured at 4 , feet above, ground level, and the focatuon Of prdOosed tree pAantings, if any 18) The existing uses of thelpropdC.;ty, ,including the e .. ur^es and the 00*4 0bt use of the all str��ct l,�yaatioer o the structtar�es, and a statement of vitlich sty 0Wres are to remain after platting 19) Supplemental information including, a) Propeted deed restr°tctiarm' (if an Y) y b) Proof of Property own ship c) A . proposed plan for 0, vision of suibdiii.sion improvements 20) misting natural featUresi including rock aot ,, - cropping*, wetlands ,,rd a�r5: ArQ�s Xf any of the , for ego ing infortOttion Cannot pv`acti sho on the prellsinary plat, it shall be be shoo on rated into .a narr'at° `fie and tiibmitteed with the app►li do : ,• Mimi- ,�; .11.1•024011..$11.1......111 111M1.111111.016311•11•0110.114111111COINOWIL 1.1) _ rswrs e.. r �r�u% r. �e�r�ei�1® �v�ci�wi. nniwd� .--4„u�*. >x.'wniuirm�a ", (232P /oreP) APPt1CATIVA uliedutsT Pale 4 9 ti 4 fr b PG. 12) coping L2 6li�L 4PLxClIaR 110. 2. C/TY DSPARMENTS Building official /[rave S. City Reccsrder ftOitatoring/Chri = s p. Pareita P.ciALtetor/VIola G. a. SPECI113. DISTRICTS Fits District (Eisk -651 boost' Tiger Tatar Oiatrict 6777 6W 6ur duce St. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatia Valley Water District 6501 Stf Tayloru Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 APVEC! E0 JURisozer O Wash. Co. Land ON a Traacop. 150 P. Platt Aw. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Care is _ -,. Rein Martin in Milkce Boxrasoa Scott Ring Prod Eberle City of Beaverton lcyx - Principal Planner PO Doan. 4755 Stonterton, OR 97076 City of King City City Ededagc 15300 SW 116th Ring City, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswegt .... -. City Mtlnagar 380 SW fl Lake Owego, OR 27034 te Rig wny Division b 6lorau PO Bee 25412 Portland, OR 97225,-3412 5. S5trAAL CYES oenerRi Telaptiosei.. Engi sr rg Of aria PO )door 23416 Tigard, OR 97201 -4416 6W Nratornl Gas >ti, _atala ��es 220 , One cO d at*. tt1ind OR 97a^69 mss, tCr C46119010141.- tot tine Ballocrt 3500 aW rd.ond tau Portland, OR 9f01 ' L �i. 0blenab $ Cable (*.tail* Rto ) .14200 tit Si' Ct. aiiini*rtillio get 97003, 6. suet kiiitectikii &a :Witte* Si!. (0009 . ! St Prate LIMA' sDept. .: W.RI: Paa ll 9n 9,Oi141114 P0C 7. 99.999tAtM:',1029dil*ii :.®... $ orpeo of jIaO4 t'a t Offer S Al Fa�clf�la 'ira�n�idgps#+etlaxi 51. , gassy' P1.3 .O jeet. GOO, SW 4tll.. Ave tie e...lt 364, tidllaai statues PortilanI. OR 97j0SI Parke a Rcr�eaCioa Board da 914operatiket, School Blot to. d! ... (Insa lobe PO lists 200 Beaverton, at "!7075 School Dint. 231r (Tigard) 13177 SW !acidic w'. Tigard, Oft 97223 Oniflod gage Agency/8h4 Pragrai 155 N. first St. gillsbOae, OR 97124 Winder/ ensedesion 320 SW !perk toots 530 Portland, OR 97204 NITRO - CRIDDRIPACIIS PR %4 $01 Boith QCPA's /MOh °a) 600 RIC Grand Portland, On 97232 -2736 ALLl1 (CIA'a /l4* e) 1175 Court St. ZS Srlso, OR 97310-V490 ..._ Other 41•11.11.11.10i =ION IMO MN City of Dacha '°'°"` -" City Manager PO Bon 23483 -3443 Tigard, OR 97'424 City of Portland Planning t itec lrac 1120 SW 6th Portland, Olt 97204 Lie Ralteann 9002 MC WeLotighlia Milininkie, OR 97222 City of Tualatin .,.e._ PO Dm _.369 Tualatin, OR 97062 ""--- Reao�eral R7iie. Brian *Stir 14655 SW Old ;ttfiol,la ZIT:. , oR 0007 Metro Arcs ©tsiuoiittetflo "�° JSooa flaxitt lidat ®s., Tine identant 1'Y1.S NW 1090 PliCe $*6020 hiatiattlitto otl 97006- 401116 U4 Waet , - l�atdl0 sleep: , 42. ON 0sk,a: Iztla d, Olt ': -t1e1t 'fit Wit 401122.x. SW rit5i 9s. M� „ . 1* 9 ■01Z1111111011.12111RIVAMMNIIIMMI■1111.11■11111111111.3A1■110‘ ',122.111.0111016361V =t • s r eri c Title 1nrnce.omp '- t An assumed'dbubinesa name`ol TITLE U SURANCE COMNIr',ANifCF OREGON 650 SAW, Griffith Dr., . 'Suite 100, Beaverton, OR 97005 (503);64i- 9565''` : DALE DEHAPPORT apprecieto this opportunity t be of sWvi a to you. Please rernamber First American Title lr►ssrrance Company or'Oregon for ybiltESOthy end Title insurance heed& Agents and oti yes in the folloWir►o countial in Oregon Benton, Clackamas, Coot:, Crook, Curry, Deschutes, Dauglasi Gilliam, _ Josephine, ° Klamath, Lane, Linooln, lino,, Malheur, Marion, Multnomah, Polk, Hoorn diver, Jacks�an, �.a�forscr�, Josephine, klama , ri Sherman, Tillamook, Umatiiia, Union, Wallowa, Wasco, Washington, Wheeler and `rzmhiil, , CIAO), #n con rmenc With the guidelirissa a orbvecl by the Slate of tegi n �iadr�t� Commissioner ine In Wished Withdat►t by aiiranco t)ivlslo W ca► ins lrfitern i ►tea than this service io dos d to benefit the ul tte e n otr<ta n as insur o, r y mill ro in tlti r rt. Pitted. 'Said a►Ara#cee mays bti c r nUa C . litY #a ben ®titti into�m,etas i� #ll na+ be i� �l� 10 /el r/RST AMERI, N lirITLE,INsullANCE COMPANY i 'OREGON 650 ., 8 . T. 'GRIFV ITH''DR. ', SUITE i100 . BEAVERT0N 9700 PHONE (503) 641 -8865 ' ( 503) a2',7 -0921 =� 'E. T'] `O S} A P R ?,ER T P R'; F I a�:hft,.. county * * * * * *s * * * * * * ** ** *****:. * * **** ** * **1.9 Ir + * * * ** * * * ** * * *� * * ** *fir * * * * * * * * * ** ** * * *'* * * * ** OWNERSHIP INFOlOtATION p&-cm..KK.. - ==s= ,:...,._ -asp Ref. parcel p 2S111DC 07400 Parcel No. :R050979?: TRSQ :028. O1 1 .-SE s# owner: ' : KR,' ICK , OEC"OROE ;CLA A E * 'Y. oOvi er r Site Address :9185 SW DURHAttl RD TIOARb 97224 leail Address:9185 SW DUB RD TIGARD OR 97224 Telep]aone ,r = Wa.- m.SC ='ii7=="."....'J' =S 'y'=.=°'==='S`r..:r.". == sALEs AND''LoAN INFORMATION Trans ferred: 02 / 14 / 9 0 Loan Amount Doct.ent # :7464 Lender Sale: Price :$431000 Loan TYPc Deeds Type * Interest R,e : Owned Vest;Lng Type ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION • • aK��l- n�KKY= Land :$31 #.900 Structlre $42 , 480 Other ° Total :$74,380 PROPERTY Map Orid: $55 E7 'Census : Tra(t 30.02 Nbrhded : BP56' Sub /Plat and Usa:1012 DES ,.: l ,IMPROVED Legal :ACRES .65 ====,========= E:centpt Amount: ount : Exempt Type I proved 57 Lev Y Code :02374 92-93 Taxes : $1,698 '0 49 DESCRIPTION C1ase Code:R14 Bloch 4 MillRate ` :22 e354 * * * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * -, =' --:. Bedrooms :4 Lot Acres :.65 Year „wilt :1926 * Bathrooms :1.00 Lot Sgrt :28,314 Ef eYearE It :1926 Heat AG {agA O dViCED 6&JFin SF : Floor COVex: clR1 T * pool a asmtniiraSF :340 Foundation : CONcREtE FTG .; Appl i axce ;4 YES Bldg qFPt 21/130 Roof Shape r OAELE, , Dishwasher Porch 5 AP 1:70 Roof dal : SHI1GL,E * *` Rood Fan Attic SciFt :' 24 0 I ter ok at : PLAS 'ER *' Deck : YES Deck gFt 400 n x s Natl. Garage Type,; Exit Fi tiSb t RS ZONiAL WD Garage SF * Const Type: DTOD' HTO • * * * * * *ilk***7tc�''ir'�JII'�•lk *1k *fit * *'�*'Ik *�. ,�'ik7S. . '*4�� * * *iM� • * �It�k��Ilsyk *�Ik *��k * *YIC*+�'��k'z�** The Information Qn Provic�d Ie Deemed Reli ab e, SU'.. Is rot Guaranteed. 1 • 1.` w 4111111,..; .• " ' • ', , '" • • - , , ' ' ; ,, 44: 4 ', 4`, . 4: ',. re,...4.444.'" '. .21, resoi sa. ro...ounr..ene etas lawkitom ow coorwo... 441* pl'44'':'":'"-irpvFrriyttr--z::-.,,-z; ..' .........1,-,:-..=.----...—:=.... ........, _ . - -Tr.,..: 90" 0 746 4,r, d* , ,NSURANcE ammummum, mrsaiwom flif , , i ' csoggg JEFFRtY.KDriCKI. vlpo atquired 'I KNOW ALL MEN BY TRUE PRBSEItirS, ThalisjuEoRGE„.9EFIERILKREICk ,,................, .4 ' ...4... i ......zo.,....., 4A ..... i ..., “ i.......... i ...... . 44.4...4 isithlari9_, __tailidArtint011:. Iardklawildamihribroalmdftfidtd,dmehlaidwfvnNknAmmasoiquikhliti,emW—mggROP ANgkg —AWL. ,,;LARA E. XREICKf us and and w ...e ,,,„„,_,„___H,".........,...,......,„_,r,.....,„,„, islainallor called grantee, and unto, irenOmee' &Ire, strOCCWEIte end major all of the dinnhOi011 sight o till. 'Tid Interest In thee certain real peoperty WO the teit,Snania, haredliamenta and apPurianatters tharautdo bokalind +or In any. who appontaninth moot& if* aro ,Vounty *4 . . . ....0.0)417.19t.9.1),..., ,,, 4tata of Option, describe is lolkosi tome? The folXowing describ0 portion of Sectibn 11, Township 2 SOUth, Range, , 1 Wet of the Willamett‘c 14ridiant Washington CohntY, Oregon: Beginning at the intell■sictiOn cf the 4ast line of that ttract sold on contract to George Kreicko et 'LW by instrument recorded in Book 4920 page 29 and North.line of Durham Rend: thence West long the North line of said roaA, 144 feet ti the trial point of beginninv. thence North 0 A., degrees 25 minutes east parallel with the east line of the herein above kiN described porcel, 276.139 feet; thence 'd4est parallel With the north V line of said road, 112 .eet; thence Soh 0 degrees 2.5 minutes West ■:. parallel with the east line of the herein above desaldbed Pareel, 275,139 st feet to the north line of said road: thence Cast along the north line t'r” of said &Z,ad, 112 feut to the true point of beginnimg, .1. . , molt Ittithlmacl casiMit mks 1,1e0iP1* tthristlith. its OWN AND iuki NOT 1...4Atrii.4 it ityi pAG..kOtstvl atittrciodi 0, As oo • ow, hooia Om to Mit mat Ataridly mid moo ss motions Santis, To _ HP trice 044.41Clitift• CON'iMin 01:4114000 on toViost swfl Ife and to Hold the lam. unto tint said gm. tiO,aa On4 grantee' o. lode% .30toorsors end " forever: The Ilia and menial' c-Jnsideration paid lor Mulder, tattled !prone of &Wait, io .„„4 ................. . oisow000r, Sito edtitell mond:Situation. ctinollio al oai inckedes other Oroparty vcor-ettiO de'vesi or prorated 0191113h 13 /. pliglt0 • 4 conelderebon (indicelb 97111100A (The coollin ego betwoon tho tymbololk It not toppikabloettOold ofelstret, Soto ORS PS 0304) • cottotkidnie tide deed Arid WhotO ShO contorl roquiroke deo iitngenat Ind:It:dee The c! and eal gramitiseicai 90001dooke 1 . „,., , • • t'•.‘ OUNTY • rotVi WM a ram . qs. eLt nMo Mengel 'hall bit !milled to anOloo tho ptoPiolotio ro0i apply equally to co nokations in IVhozool, the drentor bias oeecuted Shia insinintent eV,1..titey est II cospeSaito grardor, 11 hod tOilbd 113 min* to bit insin*d and 4101 air b$' 11. dill duly etaiho got Ohmic, b' odder al its board of (*actors. 44041.044viree'''.,4444i I iniouited oullootatio• ettli Doom* mei -4 1 ' i srerit otc' 0 Eat L,.. . lent41- .. 4414•41.&-C4f4or,447444.• V4444474"4 II. .ie e 4.44644 tkitatrIlrkhhort•tatattelmse 4. to0.4444 tooniiiii ""Opooi tho oboioo iisionidti. . t. . tit,,,,,,, .tt iittttflit,44te ,P.9.0*.gg....4.9.f.frAY Ktaiglt...,,.... , i ii 4 44144 44444 4ali 41 .... it . 44,444 4. .. i 44 In a■ fiii.• ,,,,,.1,4116:i 1184 4 111.4141.04.1. , . " 46.44444444, et: a : too GEORGE, OP' 0111E000i Ootortip .... 14 44 44 4,44•41 • • der 44.1.4 - 14.4141iiiiii4eiiii.4.1.40 , ii•eciiii114.4 • isinare'N''' qt. pifierike 44:4ta , otait•440441404.444414,444 44ti.at,„14 ' 4•4044444444 trod ' I 444444444144444.4, 444.41 ' 444, ' 404441114.444iatitc i 444,1441titiVa Wine 1100 01011.41. iiith 'too minuta aito Writ 140 Ohl o'dkt imp Met the deo . . lod that MI IOW le 44484444 .. 444•4441444•4444444•4444 iocriMO Of - 44 48 ilthi " • 4i CciiikOilleirie la Mit At aka. 04 oho hag •Fie k ,ieet000k still OA Ooti nknet SAM iolesPid WONOttit tie Ind oloilis %loped 46.4,401100 bp. itintuitIO of Hi bond of " and each ' akir att!iit.1 i 4'44 . , hatati444•4•IF • 4444444144444 44,44 ,, i i 'tab. 4toi 44 at%0 OCASOtriithii. Qh torOliptat :F440- „ tooll00000tp eti end 6'4 #.1irtirio .. sit /Irk. conin'heivr. atiPire4: n • ,s•itere hibta too visor. V., 'rollmop rolbiao od6,11)r / . . o Of1 colonstosran 1..; . , , • , ,, ii i )44,4■./..014 4.4,4,44404.414.44.111.1.o0441WW4,41..04141.4W04.3,41,111.44444.41,04,6.444.41.10.ii“. Ok.tiONVitt HAMS owe Atitioiliiitt 4.1.0r,gp-$teiek,And,.01044.„t1A,,AreiCk,„ her Ro 00 1•44914224 1 I 44 44 444 a• MnD amilmaamosairialarri,len•••,••••,1 ':/e4•411atilh.bitititi4.4.1444,1•4••44:144444•■•44.:4•:4....4•4•44•44444444:44.i...4 i444144•41,44•444444 14i4 .4.44:444 4444.:4•4444444.4■414•114itia4.444.4■14••444,1••4444444.44.4•1444.4640,44 i 444.446, .4.4441:44.44 14.44•444,444.:44.4.4.i444 i Alta, :44444.•441,..4,44-44444itio tiAbide Otmatas, , . Mi�e$ ii ie 1411414, , eititat.t444.44.4.44■444444.444.4.4.4•44,11440:••■41•44.anit444:44:444,4•4, 4144:4■4i4.44.4444,44:444.44,..4,4iatio, i•‘.44■41'i44.4..4144444444■4•4444444444.44.4.4i4iitil litmv. Mistletoe, Vir , i „: • f • 41 , ,•`' • • ,tif • t 44, giafielbrea . , ' igita '`AMEIVIMMeterent..."Mrilanialri4K11,, • • .4 • .,..:44„,„ STATE Oli OREGON COO* Voilltifilltittil i, bonito W4 isloscht, nkootot oi Attoivtooi Cons and Taaation ihnij 1eco iii)erioals Cat 00brdath,4; dad he WOO liffitkinaldi 41" ocicalifirti and ictoidfu atikM1iiii**1,61,<1 Win • o, • t' f.01 14'• • * • NA • "el • :oc 90007464 • 213 ±1)14,404000•0214240615Kh.H. 1 44444.44.M444 .„„;;;;4 011; MA rt L�� q AS CONYENIFrNCI kN LO ATING PPOP AND THE COMPAN S8U4 4:PJfl ANY yA1 IAT9oIVS 4 MAY,,, pY,A CNAL.5t1RVEtl t N r• Z ' ..I an err nr.r� big lnR i .lamp i T .E , i?OtipE ComPi ��NY m 100&GQ14 600:: 2 W IF�I�" DI Ii�Ew S a '� 9, �E A 6 lilt).t 9•3 " 14 **II O C. % , ; , �� .13300 2 ��.��'•`.� 1 3200.. 1 2 9 00 13000 �` dg 62 DC it ' <RE Y ON 4910.: 05 00 RE END1QmG YOU Attltibb.44.' Uriiyer iepsrete iar viii _� Q..a:, .. . Ott Pali rg i rr s 3:. Shc p drtliinas Prints plimis mnpie4 eeti Sapp of 'letter "Cirifitigt order i,.:.: ..r ,.,..� . r�wi wo�.es.rua. r naVz f.. i Ae.11W 11.002 oo0M aw..na...i.,AIOS,J4aCCta•W 11 014V biescroptioN l m lmell ..�..:...,,.. ...fir .:....- r,n� e..n�.......ly' THESE: ARE TRANSMIT..:T -e "+ed below. +► aop.. Approved as submitted for tpiraval A or tibia :4tst" Aopr 'ied as noted �. Submit ,�.,�. pie for d6triWikiD;: Aetur�ned ter �,erw ns rs�,t�ts� � ..�-�`". � � e;',Rior■S Fietdro:oclrettacl Prints '7 ..> ©r reNiltlw and 'comment „ ,� F'RitiTS RETURNED AMP. t.OAISI TO US Cuelooti roraa:smY.,ei'. uurty 6 in Interest In a pr ed at did f"in 4 n .; �m � p it 'not indicating tihit the Site may oropo ■1 .. �.•.e �•.rlei�.•u.��..� plr•mlll llS14� tr h.; of a ne' h o roc meeting\'`to scu th+elproposal iii��t�, and ��ttiahe�, �� place � �9 '► � sign was p t d at (state location on 'grope CO, Pt:enned, before me this � day of ;,J C/y1( .� OM 1A I E ; L �� 3 A 1t' i\1 it i;"I Y i r `'' . , Sa ) i 55. /) ��µ11A'IR} f.'d'.4l,l lK.LN3i ,4 0. Ylo?rit31,i I. .0. ,..'..J.,103 Y 0:1:W103100 tl:P111 r !UI _ / 81, ir . 1 4 . IlftilllO�iYt'... +ll 'Iw,""I' 18414A ostnacii City of ward :,I iPI inning f iVision ;`. 1 1 � SW Hall I lv . Tigard, OR 97223 � • CITY CF ' TIW tD Washington County, Oregon NQTILX of FINAL OR +Nit - BY NSAVINGS OgrlcZit Concerning Case Number(s): ,SUB 94-0002 .. Name og Owner:,..9.g2Ise.Kreick . Nanie of Applicant Four D Construction Address go Box City Beaverton State OR Zip 9. 07 . Address of Property: 5185 SW Durham Road Tax Map and Lot No(E1) a+.a..{"1 11DC tax lot 7400: • Request: Zone: Aot The applicant requests BUbdivi siOn preliminary Plat approval to divide one parcel of appJroxl,mately0.6a acres t 5,070 and 6,824 square feet in size. APPLICABLE REVIREVIEW CCRITERIA Conprehensive Plan Policies w} 2.1.1, 4.2.1,, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, S.'T .1.1, and 8.1.3; Community DOvelopMent Code Chapters 18.52, 18.88, 18.92, 18.100, 18. 102, 18,108, 18:114, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164. Fi -7 (Res i.dent '� ... g . x n ` � a1, units/ acre) The R-7 zoning der��.• nags ' detached residential Un9�ts, public a,.,;..los�s� single-family detac.led s ;)pport facilities, resiSential: treatment omes;l n :l!iufa,ctured holes, home oci,:lupations , temporary Uses, and accessory structnxres among other uses Apps' oval as requested Approval with conditions Denial • 4 o .. City Hall, r7c�t,i sted at C �tptxco was published �.n the neW3paper,, posted and moiled to s' The rs fcrecord� ownet(s) within the required distance Owners a The affected Citizen Iza'' °olve>lent Tes M Facilitator Affected governmental ' agencies BB FINAL OIL . —�a- ttt • Decision: ms$ANAPPEA S L THE DECISION TOE The adopted findings of fa,,ct, decision; and + bi dondilaons can be •bt .tined from Planning Department, ment, ... Tigard city Hall, ... the Plan. an. U�peror 9723: .._. i !d I�a.d.6t:, P.O. Box 2;,1397.; I'3.CJ' and j arty to the decision May appeal 8. •_? islon in • a U s der 9. �acCorl Any 8 2 37 0 which provides that r .� written appeal nay b..�9 ( ) � ' " *� ,.. ring be filed Within i d �.. ftei� ni�tice is gy��zn and e With Y ��sa eal .. n s3ent The aPl?eth the eai.�' a ($��15��Q � �aizdyt�sC�dp�'TCos�cs (varies up P ied by PP Coca maxifltu ms of $g00.00). The deadline for tiling Of an appeal. ii 10 z moues r. ns..: 1 ;gnu haw,-e ar nr questions; please call the City of ' i4atd Planing Dpart4i ht, 639-4171. e • b STATE OF oPEaoN County of Washington city of Tigard (Please print) That T am a for The City of Tigard, Oregon /hat; I served NOTICE OP ►UBLXC NEARINO FOR: being £ix.st duly morn/ affirm, served NOTitCE OF DECISION FONs ',City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission !Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notics Votice of E'h ,hit "2 ") was mailed to each named attached litit marked ethii.+it "B" on the Said notice NsTYE OF DECISION as here bulletin board o11 the Y day of in the United Steztes gail on the postage prepaid. iecira .on. Of Ntich is attached `harked dr h ` e® 3hew�n o he rsc�na at a �. � �cc day o $ _ ` -e: 9 i Aa tached, wan posted on an appropriate 19e and do r° ed i ?19„ r day (:•1.! 1/4)9t11;` Sub i3 ed and swam /aff,L,R`tn to me on thy; day of 19 %.1 OFFICIAL . EAR .. i iM I . EC KS MOT `/ PU®LI1.-4JR "GON RE ' 7, 1 m kSIO EXP SEPT. 7, g9 CO tl CO N Q , .' ] - g E _ .� �,., P„01 Z C II...LA.1LX ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD B .e RZNGa OFFICER, AT X MEETING ON MnDAt, M5gch 28,x,.19944, AT, 7, .00 PM, IN THE TOWN SZ HALL OF THE E TIGARD APpx' +�CENTE +, 13125 SW HALL .3LVD. , TIGARD, OREGON, WILL ILE NO z SUB 94-0002 V b:LE TITLE: Kreick /F©ur D APPLICANT: Four D Construction Co. OWNER: George Xreick AI`.. PO Box 1577 91185 SW Durham Road Beaverton, OR 97075 Tigard, OR 9722 ,2EQUEST. applicant requests Subdivision Preliminary Plat approval to • The a l ioa four parcel , ` • lots between divide one areal of 0 65 s.cres into f 5,070 and 6,824 square feed: in size. LOCATION: 9185 SW Durham Road MCTM 2Z1 11DC, : ax lot 7400) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA COmpreheneive Plain Po1i iea 2 1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4:4, 7:61, 8.1.1, and 5.1.3, Conunuza,... Development n►ent Code Cha , tero 10.52e 13.88, , 18.3.02, 18. 108, 18.114, 18:150, 18.160, and 18.164. ZONE: R -7 (Residential, 7 ui,iitn/acre) The 11-7 zoning designation allows single- fanT it • detached residential %Anita, public support facilities, residential treatment homes r f yarn 4,ng, manufactured homes, home oc+ upat ions, temporary uses, and accessory structures along :;ether uses. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER MATTE ILL B E . . CO%Di,�y E WI TH THE ROLES OF CHAPTER 18 � 2 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C AE AND RULES OP PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARtI CITY COUNCIL AND AVLILABLL At CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET PAS: " VICES PRE AVAXLOR QUALIFIED Wdt HEARING. THE �� sT�VE L�[STEN1�iG *� � � - h , CIT�L WILL ALSO ENbEAVOR TO ARRANGE F TEktPRETERS AND QUALIFIED IAL TT RETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 6394 4171, EXT. 3'i6 (VOICE) OR 684,-,172 ` 1*DD ..._. ; .+ �..:. _ .`. THE DEAF NO LESS TAM . DEVICES FOR TH ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HE;4RINGETOMHAKE1 AARRRA dEMENTS FCRTH IN CHAPT1OR 16: 30 _, D :EFT WAIT :MN T1sTIMDNY O THIS PR .. ��ESENTHD IN ANI1�Ox�E WISHING TO L RE �d rHIS PRG�PO ED ACTION MAY WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. TXMOrt1 MAY BE P !►t '► ORAL TES THE PUBLIC HEAAINIG AT IRE PL LT( HEAAINd, THE HEARINGS OFFICEA WILL RECEI'V'E A . TI _ TESTIMONY. THE HER, OPEN Tl PUBLIC HEARING) � STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM... THE CITY P�'�N aR � � INVITE 3OTH ORAL AND WRITTEN HEARINGS VVicER r t r HE PUBLIC �BI`AR TNG TO ANOT WR HEFTING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORRATIO?l, OR CLOSE tat . ION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBHITS FVII?tNCE i.. Et&PORT to THE APPLICATION ' �N � 1NG .i1ND TF� 11CT F'�38L1C �:iEAR ��. _ Me;�� +h .;� y 19.9 �,_...:i AMY �S ENTITLED TED TO I, R]�QUEST A CONTINUANCE Off' . � THERE .IS �tC,.CONTI.,,�ANCL R%N AT �1'f3E caN At� ,.�...� i�EA�3�:NG A1�5'Y' PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEP roi AT LEAS f SEVEN DAYS .. r � � .. � S �i.F`TEgt THE HEAAING: s ��.'. ._„•r. , � ter' .- ..�� ,� rd rcr tm oTIOF Is trot OAP►PttOfl OR LTERx* PPLC LE O�', ii4Atip : CO- iv��xOC VICAR_ a�>E�,�;r,��Pa��»�. � »� • ;.ta>NND. �� D "C��PHENSiV'E �PLAi�t. rAL OF ; iT 'DI$A PRO TH iE+ $1± : "1 ARING FFICER 'L$E Hs ED U `s> RITERI )) CRx7ERIA PON ONLY. t�p,Tp± THE MEOING'' ,IT 'IS IMPORTANT EAT d, MMEN, 9' REJ4 TINE, .TO 7,! 14000'3T PERTAtht s1 EoXFI L f' TO ;'TIC ,J 'LXC EL$ TER IX.LD �} 4O'1RAISE AN X35 : ott'ErtIrdlitt4 AT So POINT I RIOT( TO THE ,otos HEARXNo O .T R Q"J $T ©R FAILURE. TD . PROVID ., SUFFICXENT sPEoIFIC Tv 'O Ax FY RD t* ' DEdIA c 1 MAX ER X.V OPPORTUNXTx' TO ''x ESI ND `.TO THE pis UR tiE EC1tDF S AN PEAL TO TEE LAND USE SOPi'4,0 or AWPEALS' BASED ONT THAT , xSSUE w rL HO:U N °S APgLIC',I dL>:; CrrittAIh L4 THE ABOVE -NOTED PILE A ' l�YAxL EL FoR. . , . �r , O (° S r OR :'f"3OPIES CAIN BE Sib PER �.' �,Ei , . $ `1A SzVE t DA' S , PRxoR " � :+ rim : HARXNdo, 7A COP ( OP' THE STAFF'' 'PORRT WILL., BE., All ∎A FEAOR I�i�f 3��C OH . TAx�I'LD FoR R CL1t�T� �. Eft �F A� AT � . 3N SPECTYO': AT No 1 OST, UR A COPY; 9AN BE ?BTAINE1a Foie 'm'E I CE 3TS PER PAGE. OR FORtitgA INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACIT2 1ti11,E STAVE' piamitkstistar.Akisap. ,A 639 -417 o , T1GAaD CITY HALL, '13125 SW its 't,L 7L.Art . , : T3Q1 Rb o o'REo9N. �IWMYII µYwiiYi it srr 1 2S11110C -00700 ♦ • • • 4-- ♦ ^ • SEZDL, 1 AltWI L W 'VIOLET 'S 15780 SW' Kt DgRI3Roc:rit CIR TI6RREI OR 97224 2S111DC- 00800 ' • o !/ • � s •. • r • . • b %... .. . HISCB0PPc WALE G 150 8N AI.Di tBRr.�i* CIRCLE �C� RING CITY, OR 97224 }S111pC7'00900 ••••t•o••.•a••3•ee e�, iiNsTe 140101(0' i/ EvuLin C 15620 SW ALDEREROOK CIRCLE .4 TLGl�Y A OR 9722 25111DC`01000 •i•Al,noe ♦a••o•♦•y e•:ii m!, EUG} E 471DO W 15840 SW.ALDERRR0(0. (IRcLR TIGARD OR 9722. 2 1111DC ' 01100 °WES,, ROBERT 13880 SW A1.61)48 1) B C RooX CIRCLE OR 97224` 25 I1Dci"O1200 . r a • b I� .. 'A 7 d1 ` a f �' �''� • S 'RMch, rasp & PHYLLIS . R 15880 SW , AL)Eli?>ROOK CIR TIGARD OR 97224 20111®- 01300 P ' « e WHITng`p W /NA E 7 5900 SW ERBRAOK TI MM 0 97224 2S. 113DC- '01400 e • w .'... DENISO v jORN RUTO N 15920 SW lairE"; .ROOK clutalig TIGARD OR 91224 . e • u d 2811100 -11100 DICRISON, BA N 15800 W OK KEADO LOE TIGARD OR 97223 2 511/1304 11300 • • • • • • • ... o e • o s e . • • WI5M to AtL t L RA!NON W 15820 Saw OAR 4EM)OW LM E TIGARD OR 97223 .. . . 1. o . s 25111DC-11 :O 4444444444e 46 4444 P�HG0 i� Y` 15 840 S37 °AK HADOW LAMB IGIP0 OR 97224 25111 -°11200 • ••4•4•444.•e•••4ae•o BREEDING, CEM LE S GERALD & NARGMS+i 9 TRUSTEgS 1S010 sW 'OAK MaAbow LW tIGARD OR 97224 2S11110C -41400 44 a.s. 44444 •a••.• riCARING, DOWER Atib NITA L 15834 S6+! OM YeADOW LN TIGAKD OR 97224 25111DW -11600 ooiG.wse$s o •`em.no..i` Y SILLIE,., DottGALS 11 kAZ�1E 15850 sW OAK NE LN TIM OR 97224. , e • 15860 SW 'AK L AIX* LANE G OR 97224 A o b e' e • •�a , s • • ! 1800 n I NSDIS ltp.ARTHA F TROSTE 1587; SW OE ±R W 7 L R &LUCILLE • 2511 11 &-11800 4 4 ii e•. a' CM®IAEIDE TtUS'J1 16810 t" 1 TIGARD F4 , 2S111NC -1190 KE D1Re AmO G TRUS7ragS ► i / s • a i e4 0 4 7 w e• 4' 3L alla .' QNV ' $ Qz zzaaazr `xosx va: o. k Q m o a w ", • e• 2 W o u a';a •. 0106t0- aa TITSZ a'4 d. 6 6� Qr d0 7 A, ciz0 4W S m6 709St ' s i+ O X3 M •• mpa'mv. • OOLVO- OOTITSz �ZZL6 gypr 0 'd a i T v shy` MS'S-PST l ,. �� ilibl�i� +c)' ^" S , O'1' ° 7.. a u/0 O a «'yN �RFL`i 91 X dOte d► Q'S$ MS i6LS7 ,H marif 64119 butnsas er ►o•o•••r•s ►o�.►14•oa 009, -QOTtts teEL6 Q? am ox o m HOGVHH NVO ms S Zv j 6 QS[1L1 °S104VSw O0SET-33tTT$Z Es, t6 fig► 04711f4x 1v $00‘1311 $40 As SpgST HSIHO?Z MOB NtIrC 14$ �y0 S,�09S1A MCOVaH XVO MS Sfi$S C • V570.aav /�0 li '' NNR014 .ow....••R...wa.•.. *• 006E1,'30N`t5? ►ZZL6 HO OOIa RSVI SMOOVEN XVO MS SLOST r sno iiwi ''uasauu °"*. OOSEtrr3QTTT$Z • •.O • . • 0 •,• • • • • • • • EZEL6 U0 c aI1Da IVQ MS !SOHST V Mvzr 'v0 00teT• -O tTsz PZZL6 2{Q QIM SATZ MOM= MVO SO6ST' a LSS» L WwinrillImvausuva 'hs�SI I mias • lava wirienni 41- sI$O ••..••w.••us••gl .o ►.o 00E ET -out is TsZL6 Ho GHVOT t9ZOEZ Y zzxsAu u 0X071 a°Iainwd LLNIM O D O O• Y O O O O O[ O► O O••. • ov t -ou rrsz .r� \iLb�[O.b L 2isVI MVO) MS SOSSI •. •.•••G••O #rJ oGOtt- r$UtTtsz EZEL6 oUVO a 9i&IZiri MOM= XVO M. 0E6ST V Asa unavilv stiztacersi .. • .. * • r .'. . ► . 007MT- 0aTTt$Z EZZL6 17.0 }M1� Q 0Z XVO 149 Ot6ST 'ZVU P SZT- TItTsZ • • w • tZEL6 110 UUVO'IZ, afili7 f4Oaraff MS Qt6ST 3' t3X!iZUVW 14 Rana 'ON$ i . , i ► • . O • • ► . O • . • O O OO T- XItTTsa' 1►ZZ46 110 GHVOII _ av b Oavzil )dQ ms . 046$t nIaan?OKV /)1 20tigauTo szoo •••♦•bawf••rt «Oao• „v••• 00c'Zt_oQtttsZ EZ; L6 21, a IeoIL • 'I MOKirmly° MS O06ST 03IOa ONv '. H HU00111 'K'a,NQQi S114ALB- 001O • IAD R :4ISJ1 D, KASEM ' MD t�11 R WARZIEH 16025 ' ►2ND bR 97223 0114A11-410 300 ' 3 b O • ! O .'. • A .... O • • .�. O ♦ w, • d A: ?tato ; ilzaz IEL E . MA 'O 6075 Sw 92 14) rIG It 97223 4 G114AB -OO90O e • • 0FRALDI A 16125. w 92ND EDE ; ST OF P`!I KFATh" El•'r4! 'h 9290 Ortf)01111E9klit T GA �.', ' �t 223 04' Dl'5ICx 23 �Y.�. 23137- Ski �� - X17223 *.4EQRGE ItRtci< 9185 SW DukU4 RD TIOARD OR ,97224 281110C-00700 .o.o•b••vo•0000m SEI DL, EM(7,11uEL ; VTt",►.*.►, T S 15780 SW, AL0ER8ApOX dtRCLE TIGARD OR- 97224 ..4.. 2S111DC -00800 EtSCHOFP,, �!` AL' ` '4, 15800. SW ALDERBROOK ettir, E, KING OZ .`Y' ; G 97224.. 'A$11111:06 +0O:Fd0 • d • • • • • • • . e • • • . e ♦ • o i WEST, LEoNARD 'Z4 / EVELTh C 15820 Sid' lilto ,'RBRODR CxRCLE T/GAREv OR : 97224 25111DC- 001100 0o ....•.S •.••.•s bONRES, ROBERT H D LUCILLE iD 15660 SW ILDERSROO1( CIRCLE TIGARD 0 9722 2S1a,IDC- 01300, 1,66e•Lei••5.ii.o•e•004 WHii°TNEY , Iiiuu. W /LEONA' E 15900 SW ALDER874OOR CIRCLE TIGARD pR 91224 2S1a.1D0 11100 6•4m4.e000 eiili'•.•b•oi DICKISON, BARBAR O, i 1$100 I P OAK MEADOW LANE TXGAr4D OR 97223 2S111DC-- 11300 . ..ei.1i.•:••se•e.:eo WISHER,' ALLEN 'L AND aYPsVMOND vi 15120 SW OAK MEADOW LANE TIGARD OR 97223 2811100 -- 11500 6:e6:.55555.6:.,.0ee6ii iEPPTNG, PEGGY aNN 15840 SW OM( N AD0W L NE TXGAIt0 opt 97224 2S111D0 -11700 •664,4: ••aebe. FREEMAN, EUGENE E /EILEEN E 1.5860 SW OAK MEA,nOW LANE T /GARD OR 9722'4 2S111DC °1800 •e••esbeoa•eoob.. RONSIDE, lf+lARTHA E 1'itUSTEE 15870 SW O14iII€ MEt0OW LN TiGARD %sR 01224' 2311100 -11901 ouo siido: •saSSS. DENKER Aft 1 1i.1“ & JIEAETTE TRUSTEES m • .; . '• •••• 2811100 01000 MACEY, EUGENE 7 /rONNA J 14840 SW ALDERBROOK CIRCLE. TIG »: i OR 97224 281110,0 01290 rr•• •.•.00•••p.'i•r•i STPctA0'CM 1.. ' ED' & PZ,IYLL S R 1588) 5. K CTRCU W TIGARD OR 9 7224 o • • . • • Mr y. 2811100601400 . • : • .. 0.0 D1 NIS0N, JOHN RUTH a 1 '5920 SW ALDERF3ROOK CIRCLE TIGARD FOR e'f7224 2511100.- 11200 :. • .: • BREEDING, ► ANLES 'GERALD i EARGARET'HARY, TRUSTEES 15810 SW OA K 14EADOW L'N TIGARD OR 97224. 28111DC-11400 •16,0o••.S5• i.as:ebo•b FEARING, O0NHER AND EONITA L 15830, SW OAK gEADOW LW TIGARD ' OR 91224 25111Dc °11600 • +drub eb:• ooe�•oa SA:,S :LLIE s DOUG•ALS R A, LORAINE 156V6 $W OAK MEADOW TIOAAfi OR 97224 251IIet gt�er�l�y Q/�/�y DC 11800 inoe•a.eoMo •.•walb.ai IRONSIDE, MARTHA g TRU6EEE 15870 SW OAK MEADOW iN' TIGARD OR 97224 4664. 2S11161-11000 ..eb b o.5ltcoo•i: DENTRk " ARTHUR G a JEAti;l a� ..' .. _. . ; 6666 OAK ... .. � .,, 15880. SW OAR' MSADOWS L,; T1GAttD OR 012241 � •F 6 o • 2S1111DC'12000 oiu•boe ry•.Y'drdiisai8 STOW:. ,. MARY 1B 9c SW 01470 MEADOW LANE IOW aL DL 15880 SW OAK MEADOW LIB TIGARD CSR 9724 25111DC- 2100 •••,q••••••••••••••• ■• JOHNSON, 'ELtDOEff 14 AND DOROTHY O. 15900 SW OAN EADOW LANE TIGARD . OR 97221 25111DC- 12300 .• C<••.•••• •• • COX, 'CLAP ENC3 n /JACQUELINE K 15920 SW OAK MEADOW LANE TIGARD OR 97224 2S111D'.- '12500 UAL', 4EARL 1591) SW OAK MEADOW LAN TIGARD OR 97223 64444444•44.4444 togas) 97223 231116C42200,!{ ••,Lsi• +�••'+•••e's•o.iie 008E00, 15910 W .OAK ` ADO LME TIGARD OR 91224 0,01 Ii. -.• 511:xDC. -? 2400 i • 4 C b 4 • • • M• • •, i 28131DC -13100 i; a.6.46••.,..0 ••e•;' WINTDRMANTEE, LLOYD E TRUSTER PO BOX 230264 TIGARD OR 97281 25111D0 -13300 •;e o• 4Ii•e•6.•••;o•eii GRISLER, WILLIAM PAUL "Y'RUSTEE GEISLER, BARBARA WILLIAMS TRUSTEE 15905 SW OAK MEADOW LANE TIGAItD OR 97224 2S111DC -13500 .••.•• • • .••♦••. • •I MULLER, MAnCUS 15875 SW OAK MEADOWS LANE TIGARD OR 97224 2 11PC '13700 4441444L••e44j •••.•• 4OEN, ALAN O AND OLGA A 15845 S'W OAK MEADOW LN TIGARD OR 97224 yyj�Sy��1i1Di,�- !139g0/0��1 y�e g*3 *3 i *3 . • .. , • • . i 3 s e 'i i fi e. L•i'PAINS, THEODORE AND 16505 SW OAK 14 A .DOW LANE TI ARD OR 97224 251111 ;1) - 04700 •. 4 e• e m 4 ... e e e a *3 it •. e• K 'tUPP, RAND, LL 'i GENE AND NANCY ANN 15805 EW ST.TF4'RD LOOP TIGAtD R 97223.'., 251100, °.04900 a c e i• e e s• e s o s• e b o e e r ►AV $ Yld, JEP'FRE" EDt+i A ' MARCHETTI,' ARTHUR C AND ESTHER A 15930. Sw OM MEADOW DRIVE. TIGARD OR 97223 2s11�1DC-13000 d7T :ArB, DOLOTHEA' 1 15935 SW OAK MEOW TIGARD 2Si11L? -132Q0 NELSON, RUTH M 15915 W 'iK MEADOW LN TIGARD OR LANE OR ,91223 • ••i 44444. • 4444444,••• 91224' 25111UC"- 1,3400 •••••ei:.•h•.••e0 . GALLAGHER, JEAN A 15885 •W OM( 14EADOW LN T1GAR OR 97223 25111DC 13600 ......e4••o•i .es .. GETCHELL, RAYMOND H AND LOUISE A, 15865 Etc OAK MEADOW LANE TIGARD OR 97223 25111DC -,1180d It.ARRIgit RUT C 15525 SW ME DoW LAME TIGARDi, OR 91224' s e i• 4• s 4 "e 4 4. 1 4.4'4 1.4 51DY) II-6460® r ti 4 4 •e•••ns4 44604•a... LL GEELAN, GREG t AND AtriA M 151. , 795 SW StT#$1TT006 LOOP T:GARD OR 9123 281,l1DQ -04800 bni•a•; *3. •.:441, •. PAIMNIO JOHNS & CAROL. h 15815 SW 5`RA'SCP0RD LOOP TIGARD` OR 97223 26111DD O5O)0 es•a•4e444.464444 $AfeSINGER, klgtth C SHIOtit ?, DDN1IA $3.1416,6!--1490 ( h 4 e' � a r` °e tj' e e i '#40# ti .4,10e$4'0, VIM 4Etill'AtOTE- 4880, aw O OW L 0 " OR :97224 23111DD 04900 #86wdr i)40 X S 014 :470 FE411 'ED141, S 1,48 Eg# tT ai' ' tt*L' P. 97223 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] line'_ if " §-, fine %Est 6, OA., F' 9 e, + a or e "pot* d t: WASHINGTON INGTON C NTY OREGON SCALE. "ft zoo' 0 TtGAR4 HISH- SCHOOL SCHOOL. - DISTRICT lei J 1302 p ' Jars 294 atoll .. tan 1:7112S Um- Co: Eld:. gia *O? 8T +8f/ 4 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] • Tigard Planning Depat' meritit 4 : \ ATION: 9185 SSW ]�urhau! "Road �IY/O�q/p] 1WC 2S1 ,.115E t lot , ` O,0) The __. pplica�r{� 1��{.-,,� S� �J v ^� `.yam) ,.. h�I ��..rYii6.MYlIrAlilllOrRI M.IIYYOIfIIY,I�I¢YYY.. �Ii�IYlYOOY .Ut requests - IW�'Y�Y �I �✓�wn. Preliminary Plat approval to ,divide one p a rcel of rosl,clmate11 0.65 � zirxeo into fouar, /dots ,between 5, city and 6, 824 `.square feet `in size. °is�PP:L!CAPII E REVIEW CRITERIA': ComprehensiVe Plan Policies 2t3,• l,. 4.2...1 7•1•2, 7.3.1, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and;' 8,1.3; Community eve1cpmelfit Cade chapter /8.52, ..16.92, "18.100, 18.102, 18.105,. 18;114 ,x'8.150, 18.160, and 18.164 ZONE: 4 -7 (Res3dential� 7 units /aor0) The 3�fr,l" zoning desi.gnat .on allows' single - family 'detached, ;tesiu ,1ntia1. t�. 3t- , `,r %pur lio "',support fac, 1J ies, residential ' t4'eatment,, , homes, . fanning, iinufac lured ho $6, home occupations, teixnporary ,uses, and accessory 'st,'1 'uctures among other ,uses. r ' Attached is the Site Plan and a' 1idant' S, -it.aterneait fox your review. Froim infOrrnation supplied by various departme) s and agencie. and from other i.riforritatl.on available to our at.aff, a report kid recongue..dation will be prepared and a declt.sion will be rendered on the propos L,1: in trae 'near' future. If ycu wish to cominen {C on this application, we need your comment's by , 1994'. You may ou are unable to :aces .ond b the above data please ,,phone t n y taff contact use the space provided below or attach a 'se p arr to letter to ro cu • noted below With your comments and confirm your' ecnmxenttfi n writifig asp soon as !�f r � the staff ion noted y possible. If you have any questiott,$s rojarding' thi2 matte .`, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW i1al'1 Blvd., Tig ,r'clx OR 4/P41, PRONE: 639 - 4171-, STAPP CONTACT e Victor •Adonri PLEASE CHECK THE FCLLOWIWO ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the pzo Sosal and hav no objections to Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting:: Phone Number : V!'' `7��aildin� Oi is a1FDava S. • g earingimichaal A. Pexaits x'.lcilita otiViolta 0 xzaa Lm wmktimi a4 h ,, ,71 i®ldl rstioan • SISCIAW DISTRICTS (p.sk•up ba+,a� ; 1 nod W er Dea t t "...".. 8777 SW',m hams�t. ligard, ,.ii 97223 Tualatin Valley Water District G5®i i W . `aylara F0=1 Rd- Zgard, on 97223 . AOPEC2ED 'JURISDICTIONS Wauh. 7.,'o O 4 t.can p. 150 W. kstr;ht Ave.. 131.176e0oro, OR 97124 * r nt Cu.' is Levin • !like Bcr'rlir axa • BR:Ott Ring ) trod EiXtrle City oi° 3 nav Orton ---- aim Hen, - Principal. Blannaa`, PO libx 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 C ty of ring City .....,..s C Y . Nanalor .. 15300 SW 116th Zing City, OR 81'224 City of Lake Oswego ...... City Manager 380 SW A LIAO omega, OR 97034 state Highway Diviaion .s.... Bob Doran Bo Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225-0412 .,.�' • Sn'Ifiel1 Seauera e A ency®' Pzograsa 15� W. First St. Billsboxa, Olt 97124 D:!iandaary CoeaiaaeiOn �'••�' 320 SW Stark Room 5130 Poi[(�tjland,, OM, 97204 PROGRAM ma#a0 ~ W.A[,4 B5SSA'4Y 8'RW '°.�.. Hal .Buis ` (CPS+ "e> 'a) 600 NE Grand Portland, OR 97232,-2730 DLCD (CA7'siSOA's ) rr'1175 175 CO Z, St. 7673 pale, @;;A 97310 -0590. City of MAXIMA City Monet PO Bore 231483 -3483 Tigard, OR 67224 d...... City of Portland P3 avnin1 Director 1120 8W 5th Pd A0, OR X7204 MOT Lidaeien Rahman 90012 BS P9CB0060lin . 1:11vd. BdilWankle, OR 97222 city of Tualatin ..°" P Sox 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 5. SCI AGENCIES talwphone .....�. Engineering Office a'?C1f aoar 23416 Tig z d, OR 97281 ,-3416 fLatur�a, Onto Scott.;Paa3L er 22'0 1Wi' 8dOond AvM, POrtlaildr OR 97?09 TCI Oabwieiran of Oregon tinder Per®: s 3500 Ptak P•*5 St. Portlanad, OR 97201 Ca7luobia Cable _ ('Pxank Stone) 14200 SO Puigadoo . Ct. Beavettan, CR 97005 A, STATE CI S , Grouautida Div. ( 02) Dii': t:itt a Of State La;vda Conn:erne Dept, d.i' ;• Park P$aalb S Wildlife PU0 gept. of 1chviron■ Quality 7. #110111tht AbEtcxrd cor »a. Of Vngiu0,ro Pout office Ott Smith 16e01 f10 Trap a :,'tatioaa 0'4 aauty bathe M Parney, RAO o F' 4�ct 900 SW 6th Ave® nto, A.' 124, 112616#, station Portland, 97200 Ss al B1ect Vivien 14655 8O Old 97007 • l "ems' Atoll CosennientAtine O'aap5oin U itt chain . ee Teci toiogg Center 1015 r0 169th *lade 6 -5G20 B0av ed tom, OR 7006.64e446 , DO 204W POtO Rohm 4221 6W O6k St. pbrtaatd, OR 97204 Ttillet T reneit Dev. ..°"°..° /tin knocr 4012 SR 17th Ave. 1'0l;sr end, OR 97202 -y�i ,., �.;,'��! fir.• „!� .,r, `t� [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]