The URL can be used to link to this page

SUB1992-00008POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. -T0915 SA 12 st Ave 1 $ 1' . 1 4 0 , 1 1 / 1 Q ti+..{(wr1�+L.wu.�w.��n1;:1J' Fi?..�[��!"`• >rr•.�«r4.x�r pR0P0SAL DESCRIPTION RILE NO: SUB 92 0008 / PUR 92. 0O0 // VAR 92 -0 FILE TITLE: SC}I Z / NIE YER / EDWARDS APPLICANT: J. Niemeyer ormER: Martha Schulz c/o Roger Edwards 14550 SW Hazeltree 4500 SW Kruse way Tigard, OR 97224 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 REQUEST: A request for approval of the following development applications: 1) Subdivision preliminary plat /Piann5 Development conceptual Allan approval to divide a 7.85 acre parcel into 51 lots ranging between 4,700 and 6,800 aquare feet in size, 2) Variance approval to allow an increased lot width to depth ratio of 2.8 to 1 on one lot where a ratio of 2.5 to 1 is normally required. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community J velopment Code Chapters 18.52, 18.80, 18.88, /8.134,✓ 180150, 18.160, 18,, 11;'x4. LOCATION: 10975 SW 121st Avenue, between SW 121st Avenue and SW North Dakota Street, north of Anton Park $1. (WCTM 181 34CB, 'tag lr t 1.00) R-7PD (Reeidential, 7 ufiL per swtre, Planned Development) The R -7 zontng allows single family detached /attached residential units, deap1 zips, public euppsrt f, .cilltioa, mobile ho ms parks and subdiu'i3ion, residential treatment home, manufactured homes, family day dare, home occupation o temporary use, residential fuel tanks, and accessory Structures among; other uses. NP0 CHAZRPERSON & Cal Woolery PHOM NUMBER? 639 -4297 CHECK � Y WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION COMMENTS p BACK TO STAFF ON 199y -� --_ PLANNING CDMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: / TIME a 30 + " DATE OF NEAP :11$G yt��s'� �Q �y }�. 6 � ..+cf�.�we�+s.�+1�^ d 1 •. rYdtiN } '! Y ®11J O. CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME e a 3O ;0 ATTACNTS MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN - NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN OT TER: GRADING PLAN STAFF or.y,,lii.LACT: e76rY fe" .- 633'•41+ OF ; WAND O!oN BRAUELEYMARELIGEEM CITY O1 TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Bo= 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 6 9 -4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION SW 121ST .AVENUE NORTH DAKOTA STREETO ' And ;7 T sc�; ur�� „. TAX MAP AND TAX L(T NO MAP 1S 1 34CB QSd Z. //�� FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. AVOW OTHER CAS, $NO1. s RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTS BY DATE: "' Application elements submitted; Application form (1) CB) Owner's signature /written authorization (C) Title transfer instrument (1) Assessor's map (1) E) Preliminary Plat (pre -app checklist) F') Applicant's statement (pry -app checklist) (G) Ii n SITE SIZE 7,85 ACRES PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* MARTHA SCHULZ ADDRESS 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER. PHONE 639- 3341 CITY TIGARD, OREGON ZIP 97224 APPLICANT* J. NIEMEYER, C/O ROGER EDWARDS ADDRESS 4500 SW }RUSE WAY PHONE 635 -2660 CITY :LAKE OSWEGOti OREGON ZIP 97035 *When the owner aad the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a l:easee in possession with written authorization from the oiler or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owners) must sign this application in the spa'-:.e provided on page two or submit a written autbdriza' ion with this : pplica ?iliu,g fee ( $415 plus 5 per lot) DATE DETERMINED TO DE COMPLETE: 2. PROPOSAL SUFI The ownoiri7arrecord of the subject property rop ertp request.erdtission to divide a '7.85, ACRES Tote ParSe]nto 51 lots between `fl (number of lots) 5 -'0f " ' and 6,800 square feet in size4 FINAL DECISION DEADLINE P. LAN/ Z DESIGNATION: i t r, 1 Hue— /'at f 440,0.„ •.. 1 i 4 �2�OPi 13P ��' �► -- onz a51-1' '09 ham, A "Of - . ea ti Rev *dt 3/88 4& /8S ` � ginsi Approval Date: Planning Eigineering..�.. R. cordir Data and Nt tl er. I • "�pmehtq} Se n iti e' Land$ et+`' other land 3. List any variance, Planned Degel o actions to be.. considered as part of this application q ` ARIANCE - `LOT 63 • Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you Qubui 044)1/cation. APPLICANT($)"r04414 CERTIFY THAT: b*:�, oar. ttached'� +� .ar i,4�oeed tupen the subJest sfltt application it granted the ,ppl(t ain't will exercise the rights R SIGNA Q husband and wife) of the st'�b Ject property SIGNATURES cif each owner {e� ▪ If ranted in accordance with the terms p and subject to 'all the conditions and limitations or the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan attachments, and exhibits transmitted herectith, pie based and this the hie app�.ican is so acknowledge that any permit s issued, a plication, may be revoked if it 'is fcnnd that any such statements are false. the entire contents application, of the a p�.icat"ion � �.n��.u" • The policies and criteria, and understands requirements for apprOVing lca�ftt has read th stands .the the policies regta or denying the application. DATED this (KSLspt /0520P) Y�15W�+N 5vW'�t. M..r +�'�)n"�"�lty 11� ,i..� +y wr• /.wi t � �.,." �� , � h"°�N r S`n � �, "up+� Jt�r�,., .Z*.0 ! lr� ?. "E M .14 , LOCATION AN'I0141 PARK NO PROJECT OVERVIEW The project site is cn the west side of SW 121st Avenue north of North Dakota Street. A vicinity map is shown on the proposed preliminary plat. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The site is comprised of Tax Lot 100, Map IS 1 34CEin Gross acreage of the site is approximately 7.85 acres. Ealing of the site is R-7 (PI)) (Residential, 7 nits /acre. planned development). The property generally slopes from the northeast to the southwest at an average gradient of 2.5 percent. Tree cover is old uncultivated filbert trees. Anton drive is stubbed into the site near the northwest corner and also near the southeast corner. PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT ACTION The subject site is the second phase of the Anton Park development which was approved in November, 1984 A copy of this approved preliminary plat is enclosed. The City case files for this approval are PD 5-84 emd S i084. In September, 1990 the City planning staff determined that the preliminary plat approval had exptred and a new preliminary plat for phase 2 must be submitted. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL The development proposal, the same configuration as that aPProved in 1984, is to create 51 single-family detached home sites, ranging in size from approXimately 5,000 to 6.800 nquare feet. The 51 lots proposed is less than that allowed for the Site in the zone. A Variance to the lot width to depth ratio is required for proposed Let 63. The street wa$ constructed in accordance with the approved preliminary plat which set the tlivi;isth of the lot. SERVICES eig UTILITIES Sanitary sewer, storm drainagem water supply and all are available in the street stubs to the site. SOLAR &CCESS The solar access data sheet t are enclosed. [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] LEGIBILITY STRIP SOLAR ACCESS DATA FROJECT Aston Park No. 2: _ DATE 2' S[O$REQJIREMENTLOTS ; SOLAr 1LDG LINE LOTS EYNIPT LOTS N/S DIMENSION ORIENTATION DISTANCE ORIENTATION 20% EXEMPTION DENSITY/COST AME ;i`i iES EXIST: SHADE sEraAcK REM Note, 1` Note 1 LOT 63 64 6a 7- 6 deg: 73 ,: O deg. 74 100` ©deg. 75 00' 0 deg. 76 100: 0 deg.. 77 100' O deg, 78 100' 0. deg 7 qi deg. 100' 0 deg. 81 100' 0 deg.. 82 ` 100' 0 deg. 83 1 ' 0deg:. 84, 100c 0. 85 100' 0 deg: 100' O deg. 87 1: " O deg. 100' 0 deg: 89 100' 0 deg 100' 0 deg: i 100' 0 dei 100' O_> 100' Ode-g. i 1i 1 0 Note': Lots 6a 66; - .2nd Lot 113 orientation are ne ssaniiy E W due to the site bounder and existing skeet aIignements. SOLAR ACCESS DATA FRCUECR-Ailica Park No. .2 �A �.�° SICREQUIREMENT`LOTS' SOLAR SLR . UNE:LOTS L : NiS.DIMENSION � ORIENTATION �� DiS T1 ORIENTATION 2 0x DN )ENaiTPIST AmENr'ES 98 1u _i -deg. 1C0' Ei deg_ 100 0deg 100' 0 de V . 100 10,:x'- 0 deg. 131 100' 0 de 102 100' O:dsg. 103 1 0 d 104 1001 O d 105 10 Odeg.. 106 100' O deg 100' `' 0 deg` 100' 0 de. _ 109 IOU 0 deg„ _ 11 111 '1 �s�s: i13.4 114 905' 20d EXIST. SHADE N o t e = Lnte 63, 64 and 113 c i e n t a t i k l , ! W ° are ReCOSSzarilv t o the sate bounder and � r�et i n ent . VAN.. VAS.4A60/8114 AMC CM ma laglIvIdiol ColvoreW. 11A11014)N (aiD SAN CUD aronvawoodsouti,mnatutat TWO0035 KNOW ALL MIN 1:17 T 38 PRBSENVS• rhadA40146-444101441-441.0-00:4* 4440 hereinafter called grantor, lOr tArt considera lo her Matte elated, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convoy unto „.. „,., 141“ . ...... 14i4MatOSIA hereinafter called gran en, and unto eantea'a heirs, successors and assigns all of that certain mai property wle h the • tenornentee hereditament* and apptutenag thereunto belonging or in anywise apmtalning, situated in the County of ada.4Z, Beano id Orogen, ibed am follows, to-wit: 2? 64e€ 7140.04.44umaa.29.* akild4,00 e..t.tkiet,40 oe .0;4 ..004A"g i4A442' 385"4 °4-4•44 3 tA r I 4A) s • 044-30:.,vt „4„,,4 we,44•4„4 ,d1.4.06 3 3 t..e7a0 letS° 4244,= 6197toutr ee40-4r-4444 ...tervtewleese4. ...e.v.Zd'levi...v1.0 I kilvess,,‘"•=4.4., 711'44,4Z , a .....a.,,,,e,-. ed,L,,,,,t„.:444.1..,.., • ac.i.e.4 -:....) Ad HP IOACII 114611■01CIINI CONIIIIIII 016011Plipti ON IIIIVVICI 11011 . To nava and to Hold ths same unto the said grant- -ad grantse'e helm, succeseors and aseigns lo:9ver. The true and actual consideration paid lei lids kin, , w, atatrhel in terms of dollars, ii olderrevarrlhtr-estusi-aerteklemiliste-Seatelete-cf-or-ineluder.otherTropany-or-radinc-giretp-er-pmnriard-whichrie- 'itlr,ArganetdaYaitlyn-findiaaitnnwhich)/D (The toodNottalWaina Ms apnbersin, if noe aopfloilda,,hantd be didetede See ORS 91,030..) in constatting this deed and where the context so requires, the eingislar includes the plural and all gratameacel changes ohcll be implied to make the provielaite harem' apply ovally to corporations Mid to Individuals In WOness Whereof, elle grantor has executed ltde Instrument tids„Mtftheday of., OecALsb.dr ,,, 19 0,74 if a corporate grantor, it hie cat.esed Its name to signed and seal ailitted by Ito Gill se oly .authorised thereto by order out, board of directors, %ti .. t. sLoa,e1.:4:4-,,,,' 01' THIfi INSTRUMENT WILL JIM' ALLOW, (ON OF THE PROPILIM 06. SCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OP APPLICABLE LAW) USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING ,... , Mir•••'( ., 14941' ' THIS INSTRUMENT, THE. PERSON_ ACQUIRING ,Par TITLE TO v.,* „gantm.- COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIPY APPROVED USES, 114 . 44.1.1114146140 . 41.4 . 114. . ihe .... . 411441.14014 O. 1 1 i PROPERTY, SHOULD CHECK WITH THE_ APPROPRIATE CITY OR 141 .. • . b. . ill . 64111.41.4444014 114 Ow oltme. 40 *a sleveII • 4kfisrailant one this Ioiato t; eittl*.#4.Mall impeillto,1 011144.0101 STAtft 00 Oh lid on. , 1 .0' e:C0:0,a ag :# ,,.0 LACXANA 8 .. ....„„ ..... .. „„ " 1ce.bk(htotmm,nt Wet aohnowfadged &dor '2'...._'....,,, ....,.., i...,... in, s..,', fikiia wit iteriE10.1..-asOke WA L1.11..1. III to Illiiieliiiiiii y is 8 Z bY = ,...;„'„,,E1.11. tti.;,!clio, r c „ ••■ •ti •■ .. • .. . fail • i.e. 41 6c41,))1. 0,: e ere, Ponho On. Jon 114, conianksionelf(*0101 3 •' 1 8 ..' 88 44di'• • • ' • • stArm OF' OR 8001Y, COunito 00 $.4.444,4444 .104•444. 4464111 ib.61■4 ..... 01, i 111 )as. The) fora4aind Intiinmard Wee admowlefided 60100 ma this 771407440411.7444 47444404414470 iftwii 40 liOr • 000,000.,iiii$4. o 7747 Ili. o M., 0 nfoddene„ SJIOI i0P, 774.44447444,. i.74444474...4444.. 7744,4714711.477 r4 74447 1.144.4. #6.0.0.1 0,44400), ci 46644411111 ob. .. . toe ..... a ... • . . oloiii14,10.11441.410.4.4101. .0.. 614601 it the Oweviaile& 4146146111 ”11411111■1111.1111111.1111114 . . . 411.1411.11. . ... .1 1011111/ Pubilo lee Oren (Sit) iify 0mnd:don eradiern IH affiang • eaaanasol 1.41.464.411144.1., ..... 0,11i 1101.0 4 14441.6116. +1,041 11 ■11..101111.4111 4..•■ •■■•••• •• •• • 6 4 11.0144414.4.1144.11■1 1404111.144111l1J4iosit..141411141.114114441444.0.1....1.44.m1441.441.14“44.440,41 1.414.144.141:4■41444,11/1 riA1461;041411,141i4i;11,4'21.11,41,14;144,111- 1# 1111 44.1 441 /11.1 44.11414.1.441.1.4.114.11.141...11.41111.4.1.1.4. ••■iot *it j 4. .461,04 I.1 1 44 .4 1 .1..1..1 • •44.444.4.4•44.•••••44....4“.. 41444•4444m...444 4444444••••....4444■■••• 6146 - t4.414. 111,1•11.4.11 io .04 10,640616606 biii.i.i4.61.i......1*..“4.41144.4...4...atrirow4-444.14.44.44.41 m14.41141144041401•141 141•141: 414011111.9 14074 MSC 400010099 Alta to. •••40.444.0.....46.,••••41 i; .40, 7e464/ 640.44e, ; . Hanoi As fl r ees, sip „ *ma., 401.11.1.1cielie lit'ett dionaeb i0ronet Otiiiirski 00 inn fiaizodio . • 4..40 .4.4,...4••••• jOeledi••••..00.4•6•44.4d1 maim:WA. f 2.0%..745Fit ditsititletth /44444,..■ .1 1.4i OA waste MA lommentemMouxiiiniiisiVatin‘ibmiimimmelsommemaraniorplowarestustowlimilionellil • • iteAtia 9Coi titROOPti Ui STATd CO Ofliftialf ) , . COO* Of !NOON:WOO:4i IG .,,041,11 ., and4Taritallit ' W. EttiCifardr"444549a66161 Goiii riejt144elgtig:Witiutte4t1110___•gitilittrimeittl and tomtit; in bboti d) ra417” cd NA anal*, 004014,111, '), of tif 71" arc PTeXISen, Ego A DMA +VA" 5A4 00/ o it t.,1 --arotvg""' 1111J1111-8 PIO P,", ;ft .4, 4 --r4=1/11e3priowa.sg 1. 49 4343 40014C; RECE VI D JUN 0 4 1992 COMMUN0 0 Y )tVELUPMENT 12555 S.N. Nan Blvd, Tigard t , Oreg:sem 97223 ,lun 4, 1992 JHR i JFFER City yypr of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 9 223 Project: ANT ON PARK NOD. 2 Enclosed ' re the following: i bd i v s i on application, 840.00 application fee. 3. Copy of title transfer in stru a 't . 4. Cop y of Waahangtcn County Assessor's Map 34CB. 5. Propu 0 Preliminary iminai y !1 lat: / a. Ten copies at scale of 1"= 50 , e4)6' 1)e Twenty copies at scale of 1" - 100'. MI � 6. Tw€n copies of the following a. Project overview (applicant S state rent) . PreViouslY approved (1' 84) AntOn Park preliminary pat ,,,,/' ci solar access data. DATE: CITY 0i? TIOARD PRE - APPLICATION COMMENCE NOTES PROPERTY LOCLTION ADDRESS: ��..i DDSS: TAX MA13 & TAX LOT: , _ $1 3 C NECESSARY APPLICATIOat (S ) : ,6 -- PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DES GNATION fi REE ZONING DESIGNATION: ■r 7ii�lPENSmN: p�p�p NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION `.r! R¢� �r LV9,.13. `V�O PHONE: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS AtemalawnIktum i Ji Ne: gt. lot minimum lot width: Setbacks: front,- jiff: ft. side- 5- ft. garage-.2g! ft. corner -6Q.. ft Maximum site coverages ,Q, Minimum landdciapei or natural vegetation area : /�,%b natural building height: ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS .. -_. 25 f:met unlade/ got . i created through the minor land Minimum lot frontage: - i of m must have :> a partition process. Iota cr�,atecl as part partition e�uat have a mY.x`b�.mjBH�I of 15 feet of f�x�r�tage CB,,a have Maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 10 SPECIAL SETBACKS ft. from centerline of ---- Lower Streets: � - ---� wa % 1- -Y-- ►= Qae&3"f _ ..�.............:" t9. f ite Id boundarf Flag lot: 10 ft, side yard aetbac k Accessory structures: up to 528 sq. ft. .,fit !.n size ft. �iet�,ia,�k� from said and rear lot linen to IC'JO eq (w ��ro fills d) See structures up . ft Accessory applioab - e zoning . diatct d Zero lot Iota : min�ud 10 Foot €epara tibetween au rin g a Multi-family r� ®idential builiin g separations � ' 8 . ct9og 18.96 O ;3d Paige SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Flag totes Maximum height of 1 -1/2 stories or 25 ft., whichever Lg less in most zones; 2 -1/2 atories or ZS ft. in R-7, R -12, R*25 or R -40 zones if standards of Code Section 18.98.030 (B1 are met. Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020) s Buildings loaated ina a non-residential zone nay be built to a height of 75 feat provided: 1.. A minimum FAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist: 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the ding's height) and 3 The structure will not abut a r eidential one district. RESIDENTIAL nENSITY CALCULATION Com u.itity Development Code Chapter 18.92 specifies thal.; tha net residential u itca allowed on a particular site may be ca .culated by dividing the net area of the developable area by the minimum number of sqaare feet required per dwelling unit in the applicable zoning clisittitw. Net development ar€ a is calculat j -d by subtracting tM following Land area(:) from the gross site area: 1. All sensitive lands are i9 land within the 100 year floodpltiu -, slopes Cxcoedi:!q 25% - drainageway® 2. La rid dedicated for park purpose 3. Public right -of -way dedication 4. A],1 land provided for private streets (includes v -scone ®way® through parkin(( areas) The City of Tig rd allows a residential density transfer of vp to 25% of the units that could otherwise have been develop/ on sensitive lands areas listed in (1) above to the developable portion of the site in accordance with Code Section 18.92.030. It Ls the responsibility of the tiegpltcant . for a residential elevel.o men( appiication to provide a detailed calculation for permitted reeideat ,.al: density and density transfer. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS Effective May 11 1991 all subdivisions and minor partitions are subject to solar access requirements which state that 80% of all lots developad must be solar -- oriented. The charactoriotiv of a solar-oriented lot are high levels of wintertime sun striking the south walls and roofs of the house, house orientation maximizing south window area, and a south - sloping roof area To achieve this,' one may utilize the following: 1. Basic requirement: Design a lot with at least 90 feet of north - south lot dimension and an urientaten within 30 degrees of south? 2. Protected Solar Building Life The solar building line must a) be oriented within 30 defreed f;yf South, b) hkvve a minik1um of 70 feet between it and the Middle of the lot to the , moth a 0) have a nin1 uu► of 45 feet between it and the mtotthiernmost bay tldable boundary of the lot on which the ruildirag line ire located. 36 Performance Optiono Taaa firet option :rewires the house to oriented within 30 degraes of an et st -wesi axit4 and have at least 80% of. the ground floor south wall protecte4d i.'rem shade. The second Paje 2 .�"' !Ark°` -v iFi q,i � ; ".k.M , i -`,�* xi i'.u,�. tt '� -_ ` •x if • option requires at least 32% of the glass and 500 square feet of the roof area to face south and be protected from shade. Total or' partial exemption of a site from the solar access requirement can be for the following reasons s steeper than 2(i . 2. Off-site sshade �sources ry(structures, vegetation, 3. On -site shade sources (vegetation). Adjustments allowing reduction of the So% solar lot design requirement can be for the following reasons: 1. Reduced density or an increased sed cost of at least five percent die to: a- east, west or north slope greater than 10 %, significant natural featured - existing road or lotting pattern, - public easement or right -of -way. • Reduction in important development amenities. Pre - existing shade (vegetation) . topography). text sufficient to show the development complies with the solar � Mears and ter 1,4:a es�ign etandard2 except for lots for which an exemption or adjustment is required, including all of the following items: 1. The north -south lot dimension and front lot line orientation of each proposed lot. 2. Prot -stet solar building lines and relevant building site restrictions, if applicable. ?. For the purpose of identifying trees exempt from Section F, a map pl, showing existing trees at least 30 feet tall and over 6 inches diameter at a point 4 feet above grads, including their height diameter and species, and stating 4-''tat they are to be retained and are exempt. 4. copies of cal private restrictions relating to solar access. If an exemption comply w text sufficient to show that given lots or areas in the development c p y with the standards s for such an exemption or adjustment shall be submitted. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY Regardless of property with developed at Comprehensive Plan 'des PARKING AND ACCESS Required automobile parkixlg �"or Second v use T. SITION the allowed n 100 feet hou y density in designated eatabli greater than 125 percen at ion (not zoning) of the zoning ed are" this requ 25% of required spades may be deeigr Standard parking space dimekieions:i Compact parking space dimens�:ons: Handicapped parking: All p' requi lag ti Parking spaces to be and parking space size are mandated by the A handicapped parkin space Oregon Revised ' Stmttat®evi (see and o ®1¢°eitbol shall be paint eLrking space surface and an ap ...opri ate sign shall be pro Red. r i.v uses, notr�•�r � ® dential. uses, Bicycle rac • -. are required for c commercial Dee, and ..ndustria p : • g q r more automobile - - aces. Bicycle parking must b =v pr�ovi 15 at a ratio of one parking :: � �,y,�� cl,® racks shall be bicycle ack apace per 15 auto parking ap,:�..a y s protected from automobile . ;ffic. types. Planning Division located in area p can pro ide specifications for app. All park g areas and driveway nt be pav- . Drive-in u e Yu rea ®a Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Maximum access width pedeetricn access me et be provided bet ,men building entrances and marking areas, outdoor cofmiw.l areas, and pub c sidewalks and streets. For detailed information on deli requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Community DevelopUL ,t Code Chapters 18.106 and 10.105. e 4. The City r quires that clear vial= be maintained between and and eight City hey d /road above grade at road /driveway, road/railroad, en Be ro feet '� ' . intersections in specified clear vision areas. The size of the required clear vision area, depends upon the abutting street S functional classification. LANDSCAPING Street trees are required . . feet in length. on a public or private street or a driveway more than 100 fronting or all dcr�e 100 � s f er Y eaxic tight-of-way or on Street rat_ p ..... .._ - boundary. � eel: e must be placed c�,.th maust, property within a.Lir, sot of the right -o laay boundary. Steeet tr e ith : . Y pe two inched at\ four feet . aboee :a a street eet hav ®a minimum �.�:L. r of tw ... " trees trees should be spa � :gin 20 to 40. feet €ape �, � hre�� tr es uand size. rL�rth�r information A y from the a,. recommended street trees tue, be obtaine fro, ?lanning Division. tree .. seven of be planted in and A mini.i�laam of gone t per own parka gr spaces .' around _. parking areas »n order to , fir id.� a canopy off pct Landscaped screen 4 pub 4 y fang parking of ar3cin areas from vie � , from Public r�. hts�of. -way must be provided. Page, 4 I I, ■ 1UFPft TNG AND, SCREENING In order to increase visual impacts be land MUGS, the perimeters. width. Buf evergreen tr required in ;. Required buffer areas may utilities:: and Sidewalks. ,r , d to :r educe : or eliminate adv _ o: noise or a, adjaee eveatccents, ,espepia, . tvaer, different ty requ4ves .len soaped buffe ` -•:'etas alone certaiz *d e; aged buffer area , are de :... • :. d by the Cede in term of y,,, of :deciduous ' and, r areas must be Qr :� ` - « b�� a mixture rJi es and shrubs. , • bscus ing screeno . or fences ere . algid sable evq�n if ' not CGT. ira . Cases a�,.�nc �ofr�en arr, advisable only + g occup ( 1 by vegetation, fences, Additional information on required buffer area materials` and sizes may be. 8.100 a ., d the Planning D i.o n on found in Code Chr�ptc�, � l �.vi ®�.on bullet landscaping and buf fer:'ng. Required buffer widths applic :.. e to your proposal urea it. along Aortig b , a,ndastry ft. along east boundary y t:. al.ov'g south ...oundary ft. along vest boundary In addition, SIGNS fat dab tiring screening is required along Permits must be obtained before en ecting any isin n th e City of Tigard. • upon g��eat • "Guidelines for Sign Permits handout po A Gu3; Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be ba permitted if' . elor*ment application. the sign proposal �l reviewed as part of m dove �.. + L ,rte v 44 e,, II AMMWAMIlragliinesnApanassommesetwe PROCEDURE Administrative staff review. �. . Public hearin g before the land, use hearinga off ice r. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Councils �. p ,mother public hearing is held by the City council. All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department countar at City Hall. Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division .. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thuradayc will be batched for processing with the following week'' s applications for processing. No applications will be accepted after S:O0 P.M. on Ptidayo or 4 :30 on other days. Maps submitted with an a li 11 i.inchs gall of folded Bi roe to 8.5 by 11 pp � protect should be inches. One 8.5 inch by 1 map submitted fog. attachment to the staff report or administrative decisio n The Planning Division and. Engineering Div on will do a Pg*Lim ®nark'. isi revises of the .application o submittal. Staff t��.11 whether xaot�.fy► an gg,, lica�►t if complete within 10 days .� materials are needed. information or copies of the Submitted maate�ia The administrative decision /public hearing typically will occur y' approximately 45 to 60 days after an application i, p d as complete by the Planning Division. Applicationa involving difficult 've'xe's► or. Jurisdictions may ,take additional time to re 3.rn revi.e�� b. other days °r A 10 g by ur review. Written decisions all decisions. An of this ma ing. day appeal perk. d Poll matter would be heard by th A basic flow diagram illustrating the review g ocean is available rircm the Planning Division. The pre - application conference and the notes Of the confP= ace are intended to ' inform the proapectiv; applicant of the ptitary Community Development Code requirements applicable e. o development of a l ant a�liparticular m the reacme�nte a 1 c site rts aitiee Allow and c ns ainstaff and Piros;g Pmt . of t4 y bite. the conference and notes cannot cover al a.ru a re irementb ,ned aspects Of traints affectin deve o ente e g d e p g should apply to the dovelopoliont of your site Pia raailv.re of the staff to required .y . oe�d site lainnis� the . p of the a any standards or req emaa►X4 the Ica rov�.d� an information by �.rnt�. �C� not c commenu ed that a rosp � ct ive applicant e add LS recanc� �� e p � any Cher ok�ta�ain, r ®asd the Community lopment Cede or ask a n questif.5its of dity Stet relati v - to .. P to submitting an application. code re irements riot t Another pre-,application conference is required if an application to to be submitted than ... pi...Ve..appiicatiOn aoi 3.�� rerens ee uness the more conference months deemed unneoe this 4 by the awning ass b the planning i�;v.aLann. ii PREPARED BY a SING PHOITE t 6 gaga 6 .41 ?1 PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the Yom+- application conference ie to: •(i) identify applicable cotaprehennive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (ii) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific cencernn.e a and' (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant including identifying who will be the final decision maker for the application. The extent of public improvements and dedications to be required Of the applicant will be recommended by City - taft and approved by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting ,'= gencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are projection of public italcrovement related requirements that may be required as condition of de eeiopm®nt approval for your project. ighte ofd ?tME de - 1.rratiena The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicatee: to the public to increase abutting public ,.rightb -of - wen; . to the ultimate functional street classification rights -of -way wIdtb spe ifiad by the Community Development Code. Approval of a development application for this site w ill require dedication of • right -ofd -1 way for n� NA fit.'' to ._._, feet �' ' ' from center'snre: 2. to x.. center 1the Street impmement s o A l I eet improvements will be necessary along 2. street improvements will be necessary along. 3. Needed street ,improvements will include _4:7 ,,,.,.� Beet of avement ]p r freer centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewors, a five -foot wide sidewalk, necessary street aims, streetlights, and a two Year streetlighting fee: In Some cases where street im•. improvements are not currently deferred. In these cases, a property owner (s) must execute the property owner's s right to remonstrat improvement district formed to improve ractical, a conditi .2 Pedeatrianways /bikeu+a is or other 'necessary public the etreet iia p r ©veme be of devel regimen w�•�.oval, he �.'-... •' g s YA s"�� mk of a . eal against the format Sane tare Sew®rai i The closest sanitary sewer to this property is an located at ted � to a e�anitar. sewer. t�! }� The propose inch development must be coanec y 3eveloper' a responsibility to extend the ewer r along the purposed devsampm *t site' e storm sewer imnrove,mentSa w Page 7 • NOM r;upply The provides public: .water service in the should be contacted for information proposed development e. ]eiree, Proi.e�t Ttaa1 tin Val -e: Fire and Rescue District (Contact: even _._......�.�.�• ica,. nom, � t, y o Water District (Phone: 1-15 4 area of this site. The District regarding water supply for your f for . Birchill, 645.8533) provides iire protection, sery ices withi n the C.,. Tigard. The District should be contacted or information regarding the f .y hydrants, or other adcacivac,� of circulation - ste�►s m the need for fire questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: THhFP In IMPACT August, the Washington ° � County Board of Commissioners adopted the county -wide Traffic Impact Fee (TV) ordinance and referred the measure to the Washington County voters. In September, 1990, the Washington County electorate overwhelmingly approved expanding • the TIC' program throughout all jurisdictions within the county. This action placed into effect an development in Washington increased street development f Tigard hra,s�adop .�n W ,�. The C g adopted the county's program. County. �' The City Traffic Impact Fee program will collect fees from new development based on the development " e projected impact on the transportation system. Developing properties will be required to pay based on the number of trips they are projected to generate. _ - fee cats o The T1F shall oro The TIF is calculated based on type of use, oils of project, and a general use based £ g ry be calcnai, Fred at time Of building permit issuance. in limited cira payment of the TX1t may be, alloWe d to. be deferred until, � urm+�tanoe�a, pays issuance of occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is p`' a T greater 5; 000.00 �:4 ,mien +lb7 e only when the ZIP' is roaster than STO /ATER QUALITY FEET abl.ished and the City has agreed g g y ,p. Th® t�i;tifi ®d S©sera ®� stet has set em®nt Tte Regulations, Resolution No. 90-43, Surface Water Management gu , requiring the construction of can -site water q, y f and/or at•er alit facilities; or fees in The resolution requires that a fee and /. lieu c'� their construction. construction of a water quality facility be built. The fee ie based on the amount of impervious surface; for every 2640 square t o portion thereof, thereof, the fee ellen, be $3110.10. The City of Tigard determines i a fee or facility shall ba built STREET OPENING PEId'.'i� a ht of w commence � atil the applicant . No has wobta fined is street public right-of-way � � ay shall co opening pewit from the Engineering Depart � SFLOOR ELEVATIONS • 9 p have all projects jects that re i r�e a grading ..late the applic shall t � . ., sacta lot which all submit or •�� ISl[iE ��n the floor plan f with the grading plan a typical: the elevsttoht of four corners of that plan along with elevations at the cornet' of ,:sack lot a JO ° »,REAPP .1'a sT PREPARED BY: ji' S . a ENGINEERING DIVi sIom PHONE: 639- -4171 Page 8 :1 at W Staff Date CITY OF TIGARi COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION ,CHECkLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of This identifies what is. your Application submission requirements. s checklis a id r required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST b e brought :and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-4171. BASIC MATERIALS A) C) D) E1 Application form ,;1 copy) Owner's s ignature /written authorization Title transfer instrument Assessor's map° •.� Plot or site plan F) Applicant's statement (H) Filing fee ($ SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site Inforon of copies ) •� sh�awanc� �No 1) ' Vicinity y MaP 2) ite size & dimensions 3) 'Contour lines (2 ft at � � 1 ©9 or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4) Drainage patterns, courses, pond s 5) Locations of natural hazar d areas including; a) Floodplain areas b) Slopes in excess of 25% c) Unstable ground d) Areas with high seasona1 Water ter table e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential .b 5Xot lus sv far P iero teIopie ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED y ,Areas having severely weak foundation soils 6) Location of resource areas as shexwn on the Comprehensive Map a inventory y including: a) Wildlife habitats b) Wetlands °) Other site features'. a) Rock outcroppings b ) Trees with 6 °i 4- caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 9) Location of existing strut:tures and their uses ) Location and type of oti off—site ise soU�rces and of f —s i tP no �' Loc /10) Location of existing Utilities a nd easements `) Location of existing dedicated right—of—Ways S Site ®ev elopment. Plan sioNin (Noe of copies 1) and surrou s The rope�sed site can a>i,i`tig properties 2) Coo tour line intervals , c dimensions and names of all! 3) The location, `� . "i ... g ... platte..: , streets &i other,, pub. A'... ayes a) Etcata.n and easements on �,�, site and on adjoan 3 properties APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1 t 1 4�N 0: • Proposed streets or other publ ways & easements on the site. c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that roquire future extension A) The location and d.imenQ ion of: a) Entrances and e$ its. on the site b) Parking and circuation areas, r) Loading and services areas d) PedestritAn and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities 5) The location, dimensions & setback riistances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feat of the site b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis ;:f downstream ~co_ tion5 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The locPxtion of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting conm,idering crime prevention to ;hniques •O) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures ures and their orientation 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements Oradi n Plan (No, of copi» s ) The site develop ment Plan plan shal n clide a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading Will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it it proposed to be done. 2) A statement from a registered .ed eng ineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurfa' a exploration and geotechnical' engineering report b) The validity of sanitary sewer .and storm drainage service proposals c) That all problem ► will be mitigate0 and how they will be mitigated D) Architectural Drawin s (No ► of c; ones ) The site development � plan propasaal shall include: p 1) Floor plans indicating the equtxre fbotage of all structures proposed for Use on— site; and 2) Typical elevation drawings of eacitr structure. an (�o , of copies ) E) Landscape a _ shall be, drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if nece The landscape p an h analysis . � s sar"y and shall ind i'cate 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2) Location and height of fences , buffers and scteening;s APPLICATION C$- ECkLIST Page 2 C� 3 1] 13 E , I 3 G3 13 1 ] (3 1] (3 3 C3 t3 r • it • G) 3 4) The 1) 2) Locatiof terraces, decks, shelters, y areas and common open spaces Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials landscape plan shall include a narrative soil conditions. Erosion control measures that will be used. %3 E3 which addresses: t3 r 'Sian a'llrawin s Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 1.0114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit te. construct the sign. Tr2ffic eileration estimate C3 3 H) p�~el rninar, , partition ors lot_ line ad' ustment_ showi,rn°; (No. of Copies �): 1) The owner of the subject parcel 1 3 2) The owner' s:; authorized agent t 3 �'' O or 200 feet-�l) , inch north 3) The map sca$ey"� QAS ®, i0 • arrow and date C 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries E 3 width ` to the and Location, other Public ways within and sadjacent etoethetparcel 1 3 Public 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines E 1 - s (3 s with 6 or greater caliper at 7) Location and width of all water course 8) Location of any tree 9 4 feet above ground level C 3 greater '' utilities and utility 1 9) All slopes greater than 25% Location • ng • ` ity easeMents 1 3 11) For major oland partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right -of -Way location and width 13 b) A scaled cross—section of the proposed street plus any 'reserve strip 1 3. 12) Any applicable deed restrictions 13 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division wher e applicable le Subdivision_Prelimihar Plat Ma .•. and da howxh (Io. of Copies„) equaling g g 1) Scale 3450,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet 2) The proposed name of the subdivision 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector' streets 4) .. _.{ 4 fames, addresses and telephone numbers of the o14nee developer, ernc ifeer i surveyor, designer, as applicable 5) bate of application . a .: « 6) Boundary lanes of tract to be subdi�+a.dd e 7) Names of adjacent subdivision ors names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdvided land Contour litres related to a City- established bench- mark at 2 -foot intervals for a 10% grades greater than 10% APPLICATION CHECKLIST Page 3 C s Th ur►'� g ,� t ose, location, type and siZf; all of the � following (within and adjacent to the Proposed subdivision) private right—of—ways p , a) Public and ht—of -ways and easements b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines c) Doestic water mains including fire hydrants d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater), e) Watercourses f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pathways And other and encumbrances 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and store sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution 'system, showing pipe sizes and the location 'u of values and fire hydrants. Profiles showing the finished 12) Appro�;�.mate centerlxs�,1 pro g grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable.distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdi.00isi.on. [ proposed Scaled cross sections of roposed street right—of—way: c [ 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or ,,r°; storm water overflow E 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water - courses and draina Ways 16) The proposed lot co 'iarations, approx` mate lot dimensions and lot ; : 41. ers. Where to 's are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots /7) The location of e or greater measured all 4 feet ab�zvedgr�ourtdrlevel and g the location of proposed tree plantings, if any 18) The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting 19) Supplemental information including; a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) [ ] b) Proof of property (awlership c) A proposed plan fir' provision of subdivision improvements 20) Existing natural features including rock out— cr'o pp g in s, wetlands and marsh areas: 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application: 1 om P J ) rrA Other Ihfortion tc_._, •,( ?362P/00213P) APPL.LCATX0rn C iECKL ST -- Page h U.� mANZJItIn SUMMER DRIVE ,. CITY OF TIGARD Washington, County NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Concerning Case Number(s): SUB 92- 0008 /PDR 92- 0002 /VAR 92 -0014 2. Name of Owner: Martha Schulz Name of Applicant: J. Niemeyer 3. Address 4500 SW Kruse Way City Lake Oswego State OR Zip 97035 4. Address of Property: 10975 SW 121st Avenue Tax Map and Lot No(s).: 1S1 34CB, tax lot 100 5. Request: A request for approval of the following development applications: 1) Subdivision preliminary plat /Planned Development conceptual plan approval to divide a 7.85 acre parcel into 51 lots ranging between 4,700 and 6,800 square feet in size; 2) Variance approval to allow an increased lot width to depth ratio of 2.8 to 1 on one lot where a ratio of 2.5 to 1 is normally required. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18.80, 18.88, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164. Zone: R -7 (PD) (Residential, 7 units /acre, Planned Development) The R -7 zone allows single family detached /attached residential units, duplexes, public support facilities, mobile home parks, residential treatment homes, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, residential fuel tanks, and accessory structures among other uses. 6. Action: Approval as requested X Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall, and mailed to: X The applicant and owner(s) X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON August 31, 1992 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(B) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee ($315.00) and transcript costs, (varies up to a maximum of $500.00). The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. August 31, 1992 10. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639 -4171. BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding the Planning Commissions's review of an FINAL ORDER 92 -06 application by Niemeyer /Edwards for subdivision of SUB 92 -0008 approximately 7.85 acres of land located at 10975 ANTON PARK NO.2 SW 121st Avenue in the City of Tigard, Oregon. I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST CASE: ANTON PARK No.2 SUBDIVISION Subdivision SUB 92 -0008 Planned Development Review PDR 92 -0003 Variance VAR 92 -0013 SUMMARY: The applicant requests Subdivision preliminary plat /Planned Development Review conceptual plan approval to divide an approximately 7.85 acre parcel into fifty -two lots ranging in size between approximately 4,700 and 7,350 square feet. In addition, a Subdivision Variance is requested to allow one lot to have a lot depth -to -width ratio of approximately 2.7 to 1 whereas Code Section 18.164.060.A.1.b establishes a maximum lot depth -to -width standard of 2.5 to 1. The proposal is identical to the November, 1984 Planning Commission approval for phase two of the Anton Park subdivision. That approval has expired. APPLICANT: J. Niemeyer, c/o Roger Edwards 4500 Kruse Way Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: Martha Schulz 14550 SW Hazeltree Terrace Tigard, Oregon 97224 AGENT: Harris - McMonagle Assoc. (Jim Harris) 12555 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R -7(PD) (Residential, 7 units /acre, Planned Development overlay zone) LOCATION: west of SW 121st Avenue, north of Anton Park No.1 subdivision (WCTM 1S1 34CB, Tax Lot 100) APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18.80, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 18.144, 18.150, 18.160, 18.164; and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.5.4, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW: Hearings on July 20 and August 17, 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: Approval subject to conditions. r II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Site size and shape: Tax lot 100 contains 7.85 acres in an "L" shape with 516 feet of frontage on SW 121st Avenue and 1,111 feet of east -west dimension. B. Site location: The site is located on the west side of SW 121st Avenue, approximately 100 feet north of the intersection of SW 121st and SW North Dakota Street. The site is north and east of the fully developed Anton Park No. I subdivision. SW Anton Drive is stubbed into tax lot 100 in two locations from this subdivision as illustrated on the attached vicinity map as well as on the preliminary plat. C. Existing uses and structures: Tax lot 100 is presently vacant and is covered with an old, apparently presently un- managed filbert orchard. A few other mature trees are also present in the northeastern corner of the site as shown on the preliminary plat. D. Topography and drainage: The site slopes gradually from northeast to southeast. There are no distinct drainageways on the site. E. Plan designation and zoning: The site and adjoining properties to the south and west are designated Medium Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Map and are zoned R -7 (PD) (Residential, 7 units /acre, planned development overlay zone). This property was zoned with the planned development overlay zone along with the area that is included in the Anton Park I subdivision (ZC 17- 80) and was previously part of an approved conceptual development plan that included Anton Park No. I (Files S 10 -84 and PD 5 -84). F. Surrounding land uses: Properties to the south, east, and west contain single family residences. The Meadow Creek apartments and the Woodspring Condominiums are located to the north of the site. G. Proposed use: The applicant requests Subdivision preliminary plat /Planned Development Review conceptual plan approval to divide the subject parcel into fl.fty- two lots ranging in size between approximately 4,700 and 7,350 square feet as illustrated on the preliminary plat. The lots are intended for single family residential use. In addition, a Subdivision Variance is requested to allow proposed lot 63 to have a lot depth -to -width ratio of approximately 2.7 to 1 whereas Code Section 18.164.060.A.1.b establishes a maximum lot depth -to -width FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 2 standard of 2.5 to 1. The applicant's statement says that the variance is necessitated by the location of the existing southern stub of SW Anton Drive in Anton Park No. I. The proposal is identical to the November, 1984 Planning Commission approval for phase two of the Anton Park subdivision (Files S 10 -84 and PD 5 -84). That approval has expired since too much time lapsed between the development of the two approved phases of the Anton Park subdivision. The current applicant's engineer also did the design and engineering work for the earlier approval. The applicant has submitted copies of the earlier approved preliminary plat for both phases of Anton Park subdivision as part of the current application materials. H. Public services and utilities: The preliminary utility plan proposes that the subdivision be served by extensions of existing sanitary sewers from the western and southern stubs of SW Anton Drive. The sanitary sewers would terminate at manholes south of lots 74 and 73. Water service would be extended by an eight inch diameter water line looping through the development in the proposed street connecting to existing water lines in Anton Park No. I. A storm sewer would be extended from the existing western stub of SW Anton Drive to serve the western portion of the proposed development. It is proposed that the eastern portion of the proposed development be provided with storm drainage by surface flow on SW Anton Drive southward to an existing storm sewer and stormwater inlets at the intersection of SW Anton Drive and SW North Dakota Street. I. Streets and access: The site has 516 feet of frontage along SW 121st Avenue. SW 121st Avenue is functionally classified as a major collector street. SW 121st Avenue along the subject property has 30 feet of right -of -way width from centerline and 22 feet of pavement from centerline with sidewalk, curbs, and storm drains. The subdivision would involve the creation of a local street connecting the two existing stubs of SW Anton Drive from the Anton Park No. I subdivision. The preliminary plat indicates that a 50 foot right -of -way is intended for this street and that the street will be constructed in conformance with City standards. In addition, the preliminary plat proposes that a 10 foot wide pedestrian easement(s) straddle the boundary between lots 70 and 71. The pedestrian accessway would provide a connection between SW Anton Drive and SW 121st Avenue. FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 3 III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Community Development Code. 1. Chapter 18.52 contains standards for the R -7 zone. A single - family detached residential unit is a permitted use in the zone. Detached single - family residential lots in the zone must comply with the following dimensional requirements: Minimum lot size 5,000 square feet Average minimum lot width 50 feet Front setback 15 feet Garage setback 20 feet Interior lot side setback 5 feet Corner yard setback 10 feet Rear setback 15 feet Maximum building height 35 feet 2. Chapter 18.80 provides a process for providing a means for creating planned environments through the application of flexible development standards. The purpose statement notes that it is the intent of this section to preserve to the greatest extent possible existing landscape features and amenities through the use of site planning procedures that relate the type and design of a development to the site. The Planned Development process is permitted only through the application of the Planned Development overlay zone to a parcel through a zone change application. If the application involves the subdivision of land, the application for the zone change and the preliminary plat approval may be heard concurrently. Approval of the Planned Development overlay zone does not expire if an approved conceptual plan is not acted upon. Approval of the Planned Development site development plan is valid for eighteen months, and may be extended for an additional twelve months. The minimum lot size, lot depth, and lot width standards of the underlying zone shall not apply to a planned development except as related to the density computation. Building height requirements of the underlying zone shall not apply except within 100 feet an Established Area. Front yard, side yard, and rear yard setbacks of the underlying zone shall not apply except on the perimeter of the site. Garages must maintain a twenty foot setback from public rights -of -way. An applicant may request special setbacks to be applied to the development or the Planning Commission may establish special setbacks. Code Section 18.80.120 identifies approval criteria for a planned development site plan. Of particular note with regard to the current request is Section 18.80.120.A.3.a(i) which states that "... streets, buildings, and other site elements shall be designed and located to preserve the existing trees, topography, and natural drainage to the greatest extent FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 4 3. Chapter 18.88 contains solar access standards for new residential development. A lot meets the basic solar access lot standard if it has a north -south dimension of 90 feet or more and has a front lot line that is oriented within 30 degrees of a true east -west axis. A subdivision complies with the basic requirement if 80% or more of the newly created lots meet or exceed this standard. a. Code Section 18.88.040.E (Adjustments to Design Standards) state that the approval authority may reduce the percentage of lots that must comply with Section 18.88.040.0 (Design Standards) to the minimum extent necessary if it finds the applicant has shown that existing site conditions affect the development opportunities of the site such that requiring full compliance with the solar design standards would reduce density, significantly increase development cost, or eliminate amenities. Conditions to be considered include slope, significant natural features, shade from existing trees, and existing road or right -of -way patterns. 4. Chapter 18.92 contains standards for density. The number of dwelling units permitted is based on the net development area, excluding sensitive land areas and land dedicated for public roads or parks, or for private roadways. To determine the number of lots, divide the net development area by the minimum parcel size permitted by the zoning district. 5. Chapter 18.102 contains standards for clear vision at roadway /driveway /walkway intersections. No visual obstructions are permitted between 3 and 8 feet above grade within specified vision clearance triangle, depending on the type and size of accessway. 6. Chapter 18.150 requires a permit and contains standards for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter four feet above the ground on undeveloped land. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria: a. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; b. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; c. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; d. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space; e. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually -- adversely affected by the tree removal; and FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 5 f. New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. 7. Chapter 18.160 contains standards for subdivision of parcels into 4 or more lots. To be approved, a preliminary plat must comply with the following criteria: a. The proposal must comply with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the applicable zoning ordinance and other applicable ordinances and regulations; b. The proposed plat name must not be duplicative and must otherwise satisfy the provisions of ORS Chapter 92; c. The streets and roads must be laid out so as to conform to the plats of subdivisions and maps of partitions or subdivisions already approved for adjoining property as to width, general direction and in all other respects unless the City determines it is in the public interest to modify the street or road pattern ... d. Variances to Code development standards may be approved through the subdivision review process upon satisfaction of the following variance criteria: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property which are unusual and peculiar to the land as compared to other lands similarly situated; 2. The variance is necessary for the proper design or function of the subdivision; 3. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to the rights of other owners of property; and 4. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right because of an extraordinary hardship which would result from strict compliance with the regulations of this title. 9. Chapter 18.164 contains standards for streets and utilities. a. Section 18.164.030(A) requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of the street. b. Section 18.164.030(E) requires a local street to have a minimum 50 -foot right -of -way and 34 -foot paved section between curbs and sidewalks. c. Section 18.164.030(M) requires local street grades of 12% or less. FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 6 d. Section 18.164.060 prohibits lot depth from being more than 21 times the lot width, requires at least 25 feet of lot frontage on a street other than an alley, and discourages the creation of through lots. e. Section 18.164.070 requires sidewalks adjoining all local residential streets. f. Section 18.164.090 requires sanitary sewer service. g. Section "18.164.100 requires adequate provisions for storm' water runoff and dedication of easements for storm drainage facilities. B. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. 1. Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development review process. • 2. Policy 3.5.4 calls for an interconnected pedestrian /bike pathway system throughout the City. 3. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard urban planning area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. 4. Policy 7.1.2 provides the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and utilities placed underground. 5. Policy 7.3.1 provides the City will coordinate water services with water districts. 6. Policy 7.4.4 requires all new development to be connected to an approved sanitary sewer system. 7. Policy 8.1.1 provides the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. 8. Policy 8.1.3 provides the City will require as a precondition of approval that: a. Development abut a dedicated street or have other adequate access; b. Street right -of -way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; c. The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs and sidewalks to City standards within the development. FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 7 d. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; e. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. IV. NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS 1. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has provided the following comments regarding the proposed street pattern: Previously, during City Council discussions of SW North Dakota Street traffic issues, residents of the Anton Park No. I area have asked if the second phase of Anton Park could be re- designed to provide a direct connection to 121st Avenue. The thought was that a new street connection might allow the closing of North Dakota Street to through traffic. After further investigation, we do not recommend a direct connection to 121st for the following reasons: - We cannot find a way to re- design the second phase without lots that face directly onto the new street. Any options that we can find would require the removal of some of the existing homes in the first phase or would require a substantial reduction in the number of lots in the second phase. These options seem impracticable. - If the new street cannot be designed without direct access from adjoining lots, then the new street will be no more satisfactory as a collector street than is the existing North Dakota Street. We would merely be shifting-traffic problems from one street to another. - Constructing a new intersection on 121st Avenue would create some potential traffic safety concerns on 121st (a major collector street). Due to the locations of SW Manzanita Court and existing driveways along the east side of 121st, an extension of Anton Drive to 121st would not meet the intersection spacing requirements for a major collector street. For these reasons, we recommend that the basic street alignment approved in 1984 be retained, as proposed by the applicant. 2. The City of Tigard Building Division has commented that private 'storm drains and easements should be required for lots 92 -114. 3. The City of Tigard Public Works Department, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, Tigard Water District, GTE, PGE, Northwest Natural Gas, - - the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or_objections. The applicant FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 8 should contact these utility providers regarding their requirements and fees for utility installation. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. Compliance with Community Development Code. 1. The proposed subdivision /planned development complies with the use standards of the R -7 zoning district because the lots are intended to be used for single family detached dwelling units. Because the site is zoned with the Planned Development overlay zone, the lots need not individually be consistent with the minimum lot size and setback requirements of the underlying zone. The preliminary plat utilizes the lot size averaging allowance of the Planned Development section of the Code resulting in several lots that are smaller than the R -7 zone's 5,000 square foot minimum lot size. However, the preliminary plat attempts to keep the proposed lot sizes and other lot dimensions relatively consistent with the underlying zone's standards and with the dimensions of lots in neighboring developments. 2. The proposed development scheme is consistent with the approval standards for a planned development (Code Section 18.80.120.A(1) and (2)) as demonstrated by the proposed findings in this section relative to the subdivision approval criteria and the proposed findings presented for the various Code Chapters that staff has found applicable to the request. The Commission finds that the requirements of the following Code Chapters are not directly applicable to the current review although future improvements on the subject site will need to conform with the requirements of these Chapters: Chapter 18.144, Accessory Structures; Chapter 18.96, Additional Yard Area Requirements; Chapter 18.98, Building Height Limitations: Exceptions; Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening; Chapter 18.106, Parking; and Chapter 18.114, Signs. Staff is charged with reviewing the conformance of future improvements with these standards through the building permit and sign permit review processes as well as through continuing Code enforcement actions. Other planned development review approval criteria listed under Code Section 18.80.120.A(3) do not directly apply to this proposal since these criteria relate to multiple use planned developments, multi - family or non - residential developments, planned developments that include public or private open space or recreation facilities, or sites that involve development constraints such as steep slopes or floodplains. 3. Proposed lots 65 -71 and 110 -112 are excluded from the solar access calculation as the 20 percent of lots that need not be considered within the solar access for new development design standard (Code Section 18.88.040.C). The applicant requests that the Commission adjust proposed lots 63, 64, and 113 out of the solar access for new development calculation due to the east -west orientation of FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 9 these lots being pre - determined by the alignment of the southern stub of SW Anton Drive. Code Section 18.88.040.E.1.a (iii) and (iv) permit the approval authority to reduce the percentage of lots that must comply with the solar access for new development standard if existing right -of -ways or road patterns prevent the lots from being oriented for solar access. The Planning Commission concurs that these lots should be adjusted out of the calculation. All other proposed lots meet the basic solar access design standards because these lots have a front lot line that is within 30 degrees of true north -south and a minimum north -south dimension of 90 feet. Therefore, the required 80 percent of proposed lots that have not been adjusted out of the calculation for cause meet the basic solar design standard of Code Chapter 18.88. 3. The proposed subdivision complies with the density standards of Chapter 18.92 because the approximately 258,590 square foot net developable area of the site (after deductions for right -of -way dedication) yields an opportunity for slightly more than fifty -two dwelling units under the R -7 zoning designation. Fifty -two single family residential lots are proposed. 4. Adequate clear vision would appear to exist at all proposed intersections and street corners consistent with the standards of Chapter 18.102 since no signs are proposed at the entrances to phase two and because required building setbacks will keep buildings out of required vision clearance areas. 5. Chapter 18.150 requires that the number of trees over six inches in diameter that are removed during the course of construction be minimized. Tree removal can be approved if removal is necessary to reasonably allow for development of a site or there are safety or tree health reasons for allowing the removal. It is reasonable to remove all or most of the filbert trees on this site because these trees would not be maintained as an orchard after subdivision and failure to manage these trees can result in these trees harboring diseases or insects that may threaten filbert orchards in the general area. However, care should be taken in the development of detailed grading and utility plans for this subdivision and in selecting home designs for the lots to maintain as many of the other existing trees on the site. It appears that most if not all of the existing trees that would be located in the backyards of lots 71 -75 can be retained without interfering with the developability of these lots. Retaining these trees should be a benefit for future residents of these lots as well as for residents of the neighboring developments to the north. In addition, the site's developer should consider whether the fruit and hawthorne trees on proposed lots 69 -71 can be retained. No tree removal or site grading should be allowed to occur prior to Planning Division review and approval of a tree removal permit. The applicant should be required to provide the services of an arborist in assessing the tree removal and grading plans in the interest of prescribing protective measures for existing trees to be employed during construction on the site. FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 10 6. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.160 because: a. The proposed subdivision complies with the Comprehensive Plan Map's Medium Density Residential designation's density opportunity for the site as well as with the applicable plan policies, the regulations of the R -7 zone, and other applicable regulations; b. The proposed name of the subdivision, Anton Park No. 2, is not duplicative of any other plat recorded in Washington County other than the adjoining first phase; c. SW Anton Drive will provide for adequate and safe access to the lots in the proposed subdivision. This street will be required to be improved to local street standards. d. The Commission is well aware of the traffic concerns of the residents of Anton Park No. I subdivision relative to traffic on SW North Dakota Street. In previous discussions with the City Council, residents have suggested that a ~- through street between SW North Dakota Street and SW 121st Avenue be developed through phase II of the Anton Park subdivision in order that North Dakota Street be closed to through traffic. This would result in a great reduction in traffic in Anton Park No. I but would only shift the traffic through neighborhood problem to Anton Park No. II. While this may be beneficial to the existing residents of Anton Park No. I, it would have no net benefit to the public. In addition, as the Engineering Department's comments note, requiring an east -west collector street in phase II would 1) reduce the allowable number of lots in phase II due to increased right -of -way demands; and 2) this collector street would be difficult to connect to SW North Dakota Street on the west because existing dh7ellings on lots 29 and 30 of Anton Park I may be too close to a necessary widening of the existing right -of -way and pavement for the western stub of SW Anton Drive between these lots. In addition, Code Section 18.164.030(G) states that "in no case shall the staggering of streets making "T" intersections at collectors and arterials be designed such that jogs of less than 300 feet on such streets are created, as measured from the centerlines of such streets." An east -west street through Anton Park No. II would not be able to connect with SW 121st Avenue in conformance with this traffic safety related standard unless the street was directly in line with SW Manzanita Court on the east'side of SW 121st. If this street was directly lined up with SW Manzanita Court, traffic would be required to make a quick jog northward within Anton Park No. II, which may create another hazardous traffic situation. Also, such an - - - intersection would make the lots on either side to become triple frontage lots, a highly undesirable situation. FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 11 The Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 1992 to consider this application. At that hearing, neighbors of the prospective development site requested that the Commission continue the public hearing to allow the neighbors to present a traffic diversion plan for the neighborhood that the neighbors believed might be pertinent to the review of the subdivision proposal. The Commission granted the request for the continuance. The Commission hearing on this application was reopened on August 17, 1992 for review of the traffic diversion plan and additional public testimony. The Commission also reviewed the staff's August 3, 1992 memorandum responding to the neighbors' traffic diversion plan involving modifications to the existing intersection of SW North Dakota Street and SW Springwood Drive. The August 3, 1992 staff memo is hereby incorporated by reference as additional Planning Commission findings. The Commission finds that the neighbors' proposed intersection revision would not change the preliminary plat for the proposed Anton Park #2 and since the proposed intersection modification is intended to deal with an existing traffic situation which is located off of the subject site, the proposed intersection modification is not something that should be the responsibility of the prospective developer of Anton Park #2 to construct or to finance. While the Commission understands the Anton Park I residents' traffic concerns, the Commission has not been shown how these concerns are directly related to the proposed development of Anton Park II. 7. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.164, or can be modified to be consistent with these requirements, because: a. SW Anton Drive is proposed to have a fifty foot wide right - of -way, be fully improved with sidewalks on both sides of the street, and have a minimal grade. Therefore, the applicant's preliminary plans for developing this street is consistent with Code standards for local street width, street grade, and improvements. b. The SW 121st Avenue frontage of the site is already improved to major collector street improvement standards. c. The proposed lots are consistent with Code standards for minimum street frontage and other lot dimensional standards including maximum lot depth -to -width ratio, except for lot 63 which would have a lot depth -to -width ratio in excess of the 2.5 to 1 standard. Code Section 18.164.060.A.1(b) states that lot depth may not exceed 2.5 times the average width of the lot. Proposed lot 63 would have an average depth of 136.5 feet to a width of 50 feet or a depth to width ratio of 2.7 to 1. Code Section 18.160.090 authorizes the hearings FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 12 6. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.160 because: a. The proposed subdivision complies with the Comprehensive Plan Map's Medium Density Residential designation's density opportunity for the site as well as with the applicable plan policies, the regulations of the R -7 zone, and other applicable regulations; b. The proposed name of the subdivision, Anton Park No. 2, is not duplicative of any other plat recorded in Washington County other than the adjoining first phase; c. SW Anton Drive will provide for adequate and safe access to the lots in the proposed subdivision. This street will be required to be improved to local street standards. d. The Commission is well aware of the traffic concerns of the residents of Anton Park No. I subdivision relative to traffic on SW North Dakota Street. In previous discussions with the City Council, residents have suggested that a through street between SW North Dakota Street and SW 121st Avenue be developed through phase II of the Anton Park subdivision in order that North Dakota Street be closed to through traffic. This would result in a great reduction in traffic in Anton Park No. I but would only shift the traffic through neighborhood problem to Anton Park No. II. While this may be beneficial to the existing residents of Anton Park No. I, it would have no net benefit to the public. In addition, as the Engineering Department's comments note, requiring an east -west collector street in phase II would 1) reduce the allowable number of lots in phase II due to increased right -of -way demands; and 2) this collector street would be difficult to connect to SW North Dakota Street on the west because existing dwellings on lots 29 and 30 of Anton Park I may be too close to a necessary widening of the existing right -of -way and pavement for the western stub of SW Anton Drive between these lots. In addition, Code Section 18.164.030(G) states that "in no case shall the staggering of •streets making "T" intersections at collectors and arterials be designed such that jogs of less than 300 feet on such streets are created, as measured from the centerlines of such streets." An east -west street through Anton Park No. II would not be able to connect with SW 121st Avenue in conformance with this traffic safety related standard unless the street was directly in line with SW Manzanita Court on the east side of SW 121st. If this street was directly lined up with SW Manzanita Court, traffic would be required to make a quick jog northward within Anton Park No. II, which may create another hazardous traffic situation. Also, such an intersection would make the lots on either side to become triple frontage lots, a highly undesirable situation. FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARR NO. II PAGE 11 The Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 1992 to consider this application. At that hearing, neighbors of the prospective development site requested that the Commission continue the public hearing to allow the neighbors to present a traffic diversion plan for the neighborhood that the neighbors believed might be pertinent to the review of the subdivision proposal. The Commission granted the request for the continuance. The Commission hearing on this application was reopened on August 17, 1992 for review of the traffic diversion plan and additional public testimony. The Commission also reviewed the staff's August 3, 1992 memorandum responding to the neighbors' traffic diversion plan involving modifications to the existing intersection of SW North Dakota Street and SW Springwood Drive. The August 3, 1992 staff memo is hereby incorporated by reference as additional Planning Commission findings. The Commission finds that the neighbors' proposed intersection revision would not change the preliminary plat for the proposed Anton Park #2 and since the proposed intersection modification is intended to deal with an existing traffic situation which is located off of the subject site, the proposed intersection modification is not something that should be the responsibility of the prospective developer of Anton Park #2 to construct or to finance. While the Commission understands the Anton Park I residents' traffic concerns, the Commission has not been shown how these concerns are directly related to the proposed development of Anton Park II. 7. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.164, or °can be modified to be consistent with these requirements, because: a. SW Anton Drive is proposed to have a fifty foot wide right - of -way, be fully improved with sidewalks on both sides of the street, and have a minimal grade. Therefore, the applicant's preliminary plans for developing this street is consistent with Code standards for local street width, street grade, and improvements. b. The SW 121st Avenue frontage of the site is already improved to major collector street improvement standards. c. The proposed lots are consistent with Code standards for minimum street frontage and other lot dimensional standards including maximum lot depth -to -width ratio, except for lot 63 which would have a lot depth -to -width ratio in excess of the 2.5 to 1 standard. Code Section 18.164.060.A.1(b) states that lot depth may not exceed 2.5 times the average width of the lot. Proposed lot 63 would have an average depth of 136.5 feet to a width of 50 feet or a depth to width ratio of 2.7 to 1. Code Section 18.160.090 authorizes the hearings FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 12 authority to grant variances to Code standards through the subdivision review process. Section 18.160.120 provides the operable variance approval criteria. The proposed lot depth to width ratio variance is necessitated by the existing 148 foot distance between the southern stub of SW Anton Drive intersecting tax lot 100 and SW 121st Avenue. This situation where existing street locations necessitate the requested variance is a relatively unusual circumstances peculiar to this site as compared to other parcels that are similarly zoned. In order to create a lot in this area that would be consistent with the 2.5 to 1 ratio while continuing SW Anton Drive northward, the lot would need to be at least 55 feet wide and approximately 7,500 square feet in size. Due to the configuration of tax lot 100, a lot would probably have to be eliminated in the lot 63 to lot 71 tier in order to accommodate a lot of this size and dimensions. This would cause an undue hardship to the property's owner and /or prospective developer. Further, it is unclear how the currently proposed lot dimensions might negatively affect the buildability of lot 63 or negatively affect any public purposes. The requested variance is therefore necessary for the proper design of this subdivision since expanding the width of lot 63 in order to meet this depth to width ratio standard would necessitate the probable loss of a lot with no real improvement of the buildability of lot 63 or the remainder of the proposed subdivision. The granting of the requested variance would not be detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to the rights of others. No concerns with the requested variance were raised by neighbors or . utility providers during the public review process on this application. The Commission cannot foresee any impacts upon other property owners or the public if the variance is granted. For the above reasons, the Commission finds that granting the requested variance to the lot depth to width ratio standard for proposed lot 63 is justified and is within the best interests of the public. The Commission therefore approves the variance request. d. The final plat will need to include a non - access reserve strip prohibiting access from lots 63 to 71 to SW 121st Avenue. e. The applicant's preliminary plans for developing sanitary and storm sewers as well as public water lines will provide for adequate necessary public facilities. Existing and proposed public facilities will have adequate capacity to service the proposed development. Necessary public facilities will be required to be designed consistent with FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARR NO. II PAGE 13 Chapter 18.164 and City of Tigard Design Standard Manual specifications. B. Compliance With Comprehensive Plan Policies 1. The subdivision is consistent with Policy 2.1.1 because notice of the application and the July 20, 1992 public hearing on this item was provided to the neighborhood planning organization and to owners of property in the vicinity of the site. The site has been posted with a sign noting that a land use or development application on this site was pending. The Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 1992 to consider this application. At that hearing, neighbors of the prospective development site requested that the Commission continue the public hearing to allow the neighbors to present a traffic diversion plan for the neighborhood that the neighbors believed might be pertinent to the review of the subdivision proposal. The Commission granted the request for the continuance. The Commission hearing on this application was reopened on August 17, 1992 for review of the traffic diversion plan and additional public testimony. Therefore, substantial opportunity has been provided for public input into the review of this development proposal, as is required by Plan Policy 2.1.1. 2. In the pre- application conference for this proposal, staff recommended that a minimum 8 -foot wide pedestrian /bicycle pathway be provided between SW Anton Drive and SW 121st Avenue be provided as part of the subdivision's proposed public improvements. The applicant has proposed that. a 10 foot wide pedestrian easement be provided between proposed lots 70 and 71. The Commission finds that a need exists for the path because of the substantial additional distance (in excess of 1,100 additional feet between the ends of the proposed pathway at Anton Drive and SW 121st Avenue) that pedestrians or bicyclists would need to travel to get to the same point if a pathway is not provided. While there are significant traffic safety reasons for not requiring a direct street connection from this proposed development to SW 121st Avenue, the same reasons do not exist for not providing a walkway connection. The proposed development is relatively close to several attractions that could be convenient for pedestrian or bicycle traffic if a pathway is provided (Greenway Town Center, Trinity Evangelical Church, and bus service on SW 121st Avenue and Scholls Ferry Road). The Commission finds that it is clearly in the public's interest to promote convenient pedestrian and bicycle circulation through the provision of a path in this area as a way of reducing vehicular traffic. , The Commission applauds the applicant's willingness to provide for this connection. 2. In order to comply with Policy 4.2.1, conditions of approval are warranted to require the developer to develop an erosion control plan ensuring compliance with erosion control standards for the Tualatin River Basin as part of the grading permit application and. FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 14 to pay a fee in lieu of constructing an on -site water quality facility. The City's Engineering Department advises that the site developer be required to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of an on -site water quality facility. The site is considered unsuitable for development of an on -site facility because of its relatively small size and location in the midst of a largely developed residential area. Payment of a fee in lieu of construction of a facility is authorized by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and USA regulations in cases where it is undesirable or impractical to construct a facility. 3. This subdivision proposal complies with Policy 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend public sanitary and storm sewers and public water service throughout this subdivision and will provide for underground installation of phone, electricity, and cable television lines. 4. The subdivision proposal complies with Policy 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposed improvements to the streets within and adjacent to the subdivision will be consistent with City of Tigard standards for local streets as described above. VI. CONCLUSION AND DECISION The Planning Commission concludes that the proposed subdivision, with modifications, will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding land uses, provided that development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local state and federal laws. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the staff report and other reports of affected agencies and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the Planning Commission approves Subdivision SUB 92 -0008, Planned Development Review PDR 92 -0002, and Subdivision Variance VAR 92 -0014 for the proposed Anton Park No. 2 subdivision subject to the conditions which follow. THE APPLICANT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY: 1. a. The final plat shall be limited to the creation of fifty -two lots. All lots shall be fully dimensioned on the plat. The final plat shall comply with Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 92; City of Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18.160; and Washington County standards; b. The plat shall provide for the dedication of all necessary right - of -way for the proposed public street within the subdivision; and c. The final plat shall include all standard public utility easements, a minimum 10 foot wide pathway easement, and storm drainage easements as detailed in the conditions which follow. FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 15 d. The final plat shall establish a one -foot non - access reserve strip along SW 121st Avenue for lots 63 -71. e. The applicant shall submit plans, obtain City approval and provide financial assurance for the construction of the following public improvements: i. All public streets within the subdivision as specified in the following conditions; ii. storm drainage system. These improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Tigard. The improvements shall be completed and accepted by the City within the time frame specified in the public assurance contract. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED OR COMPLETION SHALL BE FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO THE RECORDING THE PLAT. (Staff contact for all recommended conditions is Chris Davies of the Engineering Department, 639 -4171, unless otherwise noted). 2. A minimum 8 -foot wide asphaltic concrete or concrete pedestrian /bicycle pathway shall be constructed between SW Anton Drive and SW 121st Avenue within a minimum 10 foot total width public pedestrian /bicyclist easement(s). The pathway shall be provided somewhere between the northern boundary of proposed lot 68 and lot 71. 3. Adequate site drainage to the public stormwater drainage system shall be provided for all lots. A private storm drain and a drainage easement shall be provided for proposed lots 92 -114, unless it can be demonstrated how else drainage from these lots can drain to a public storm drainage system. Easements shall be provided where a.private storm drain line crosses other lots. A joint maintenance agreement shall be recorded with each lot accessing a common private storm drain line. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first portion is paid with the public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increase the impervious area within the public right -of -way. The second portion is paid at building permit issuance which is for each individual lot. 5. Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval. 6. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989. FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 16 7. As part of the public improvement plans, the applicant shall apply for and provide the necessary information to obtain a "Joint Permit" for erosion control. 8. A grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours on each lot, including elevations tied to the top of curb elevations as shown on the public improvement plans. 9. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. 10. Full width street improvements for SW Anton Drive, including traffic control devices, mailbox clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway aprons, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed within the subdivision. 11. Construction of the proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans, a street opening permit or construction compliance agreements has been executed, execution of a developer - engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees. 12. The applicant shall make an appointment for a pre- construction meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of the public improvement plans but before starting work on the site. The applicant, the applicant's engineer and contractor shall be required to attend this meeting prior to receiving the approved plans and permits. 13. Prior to the plat being recorded with Washington County, the applicant shall provide a 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment. As an alternative, the applicant may have the plat recorded after the public improvements have been accepted by the City of Tigard and has posted the appropriate maintenance bond. 14. Any tree removal or relocation on this property must be approved by the Planning Division through approval of a tree removal permit and approval of the grading plan. Trees over six inches in diameter shall be removed only as necessary to construct streets, utilities, and residences. The Planning Division may require that the applicant provide for an arborist to review the plans for grading and tree protection. The applicant shall protect those trees which are to be preserved by marking and fencing the rootlines of those trees in order to protect the trees and roots from the effects of construction activities. The applicant's arborist or the Planning Division may prescribe special protective measures for trees to be retained on the site. A copy of the tree removal permit and approved grading plan shall be available on -site during all tree removal and grading activities. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division. SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID ONLY IF THE FINAL PLAT IS RECORDED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II , PAGE 17 It is further ordered that the applicant and parties to these proceedings be notified of the / entry of this order. PASSED: This l p day of August, 1992, by the Planning Commission of the City of Tigard. // ur Milt Fyre, fen r Tigard Planning Commission FINAL ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 - ANTON PARK NO. II PAGE 18 Q, -= an . ,1 inn - 1 1 1 1 - ) 5 ; 411 In - ® Goo a o ` � E pN 1 . los _ 7 - -- - -- :iT `O IC 1 Il II 111 — WO' pERR � �. � • 4 'I • 4 • 101" S . ti z � ti � go SCHWOL W..D . pp c t � , • pp0 g u; Plus it • .., , ..,. 01 . ti — �Q , i 1 111111110 Ta w ; o �pwN w O. � � �n Wp DR. — 1 j 191■14• r • Sr) — ‹/ - is 4 O " C ♦ [ 1] ;r• 1 D 3§ Day ♦ _ Q �► • i s #421,1 9fR JINN .41/01Y i DkNU Ilstatr # t_ I p , v v I E1 MI t o 9- N - l i l a • IN _CD TG WA E ' 1 ( ( 1 1 , I 1 I I 1 I I i !II W BUR a RLCREST DR h �lliJ �� s. • � o s � /.••.MI I !P • • I W . ,,,, -" ,s oaleo% �® o r '� 'P4e7 P� S.W. M 'E TINE C 1117 • s. D RIVE I NM III l i w �.sCi,.. • CITY OF TIGMW Washington, County NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER _ BY PLANNING COMMISSION Concerning Case Number(s)s_SU 92-0002 VAR 92- 0014 Name ,of Owner Maw, Sc . „ Name of Applicant: „ '.. 3ie!Iever Address 4500 _SW Krj-,i ay City Lake Oswe„ State O, R. Zip 2205 bddress of Property: , 10975 SW 121st AvenuB .:_.. Map No( s).: CH tax _ lot 100 Tax �� and Lot Nc ®.. isl 3 Request: A r•egueet far ap Eeval of the followin _ deave la rent ______ •:lat. meet elournent cc n1 L,ubdivision r ®limito Planned applications: eep tear plats 2proval to divide a 7.85 acre arcel into 51 lots rrnqi ,between 4 700 and 6 10®eguare fe± t in size*: 2 variance approval tam allow an increased lot N10±11 to depth ratio, of 2 to 1 on one low ere a ratio of 2 to 1 to ormally rceguire APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:_ Co mu: n i i Devert Cods Chip era 15.52 18.80 16, ,gig, 15., 5+3 11 160,E and 18.164. Zone. R -7 (PD) (Residential, 7 units /acre, Planned Development) The R.-7 zone allows single family detached /attached reeidentfi.al units, duplexes, public support facilities mohi loep � residential treatment family day carer home fuel tanks, and accessory Structures among other uses. 6. Action: Approval as requested Approval with conditions Denial Notice was published i �n the newspaper, posted at City Notice: Notice p ty Mall and wailed X The applicant and owner(s) X the required distance X The ®affectedcN ighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies Final Decieiona_ THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILEDk, The adopted findings of fact, deoision, and statement cif c diti5 Scan the g p Tigard f condition Hall, P.0 Boo tm23397, Tigard, Oregon 91223. �i , ,A, tal : Any , party to the decision May appeal this ,xeoision in ac appeal 18:314200(B) and Section 18.32.37V which provides that a written a ea l may be filed within 10 days given and Sent. the appeal may be submitted on Ci t y e rme a {.domust be ydompanier forme and must me 8d' by _'the appea] fee ($315.00) and transcript costs, ( ►arise up tea maximum of $500.00)e Tim deadline for filing of an appeal is use®tione.. If you have any questions Planning be partme ,a >, 639 -4171 bkm /SUE92- 0S.HKt I :' 3C) p.m. Si'A"x'8 OP 011%30N County of Washington .incgton City of Tigard. 88. deVose and eay $ (Plarease print) a. being first duly aworn/af f i m, on 00th That I am a ,.,,. � . 5 - - for City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE Or PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ghat T served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR. pity of Tigard Planning Director r Tiga d 'PLaening Commission Tigard Hearings Officer ---- Tigard City Council . A co (Public Hearing .Notice /Notice of Decision ) of which in attached. (Marked mailed to each the .._,Z,121_. p r o': a pf rub a rye shown on the Exhibit wh" was mail s,! .. . h attached list marked exhibit " � ".,,. . ,: 1� , � 1�1� � ited said notice NOTICE OP DECXSI ®N as her attached, war► posted on an a ro r ste bulletin e united States lea on the .' .- day of o ...�.�... o 19 its pastas prepaid r Sarbac . ibed and sworn/affirm sworn/affirm to me on the s w M1 } B 4O day of 19�,tX PUELI c', - J ON My C' taTi as ion D ire® t J • • u' �n ; 1 _T I C E O I @ ' , P u B L I_. C HEARING _ _ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGBRD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, Jul 20, 1992, AT 7x30 PM, IN THE 'TOWN HALL OF THE TIGAR];) CIVIC C'E'NTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: SUB 92- 0008 /PDR 92.0002 /VAR 92 -0014 FILE TITLE: Schulz /Edwards - Niemeyer APPLICANT: J. ,Niemeyer c/o Roger Edwards 4500 SW Kruse Way Lake Oswego, OR 97035 REQUEST: ST NIVTSION SUB 92- 0008_ _ PLANNED DEVELOPMENT i /R 92=5)002 2 'VAIANCE key 92 -001.4 scHms EDWARDSHNIE IE1'!ER 11 requew . for approval of the following deviaopment applications 1) Subdivision preliminary plat /Plann:,td Development conceptual plan approval to divide a 7.85 acre parcel Into 51 Tots ranging between 4,700 and 6,800 square feet in size, 2) Variance approval to allow an increased lot depth to width t�atio u 8 to 1 on one lot whereas a maximum ratio of 2,.5 to 1 is allowed. APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18080, 18.88, 18.92, 18.102, 10.150, 18.150, and 18.164; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.11, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3. .:1OLATION: 10975 SW 121st Avenue, between SW 121st Avenue and SW North Dakota NPO NO: 7 OWNER: Martha Scht tlz 14550 SW Hazeltree Tigard, OR 97224»; Street, north of Anton Park I. `WCTN 181 3408, tax lot 100) ZONE: R-7 zone allows single family detached /attached residential overfup epee, pNE, Planned Development The g _ unity, duplexes, Jt 7 (PD) Resident a�, 7 un is air public Sti port facilities : ;bile home parks, residential treatment nt homtes, family day care, home occupations, and accessory structures among other uses. The planned development: overlay zone allows flexibility regarding t certain dlimensional standards. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE COND'UCT!D IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES t` ' CHAPTER 16.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED 87 THE TIGAIrLD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OP PROCEDURE SET FOJ TH IN CI APT A 18.30. THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO 80 ; N WRIT1EG PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL MAY BE PRESENTED AT _ 1, WISHING TO PRESENT WRIT°1'EN TESTIMONY Oi'T 1 i ` TESTIMONY ANYC�'`� WIS�II ., , . _ ....._.. . �, WILL r,,, E THE PI., BLIC HEARING. AT THE PYJBLIO HEARING, THE PLANNING CO1�`MISSION WILL RRC a VE .. �� . �' -r EN TD;STII�ONY. THE PILANN'�� a.0 � PUBLIC HEARING; AND A STAF„ REPORT PRESET ,v ATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN T I VITE 1EOTH ORAL AND k . .T ' T '� SBION MAY CONTINUE TirE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAt 1NFORNATIOri Gig CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAkE ACTION ®N ON THE APpLWATaoN. IV A PERSON 'SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO TkiE APPLICATION AF AR J1na_.30 1992 , ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED' TO HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE. HEARING I AY REQUEST THAT THE REC ORD REHAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAVYL SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NO,''IOE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE =QUEST' FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD iXIMPREHENSIVE PLAN. A...PPROVAZ+ OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE COMMISSION WILL E BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO TEE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT t O :E POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESFhND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO Tai: LAND, USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS MD APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE - NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN UAyS 'PRIOR TO VIE HEARING, A " COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT' VILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY RE OBTAINED FOR TEN t ".ENTS PER P� GE„ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER J® ,y Offe„„ i4T 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD. , OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD CHAIR RSO : ao2.e_ ,914.1 uw�wr�wii 6a_,,as -mad PHONE NUABERz 1h�InNMlr�nf l� +��M1�1MiMY{�iEl�bik�wra�iwue • mar4.!A ).:7:6 �: .J a too- •"" 0.0t o 1S133AD -15300 ae.ee...... Ei ZRBOTH, PAUL VINCENT & EARI RUB 11143 SW SUHMERLARE DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD 0 1$133AD-154. ee0s0e.000.00.0000.• SELL, BRISW •' :i : R D d% CATREEIRR 11161 SW 5.10E DR TIGARD OR 97223 19133AD -15500 0000000000.00.0000000 AWEIDAR, 'SASAA R AND ARAB S 111'1 SW SUNNYM Al DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S133tA.- 039600 eeee t, a 00000000044 =DISBARS= JUDY L 4735 SW TROY PORTLAND OR 97219 1S133DA 04000 000,. eeeoyoeeoe.oeeoa DLOCH, PAUL MARVIN «O +s -Bi0 „ SUSAN 3.2530 GLACIER =.ILL'S CIRCIX TIGARD OR 97223 1S133DA -04200 ee•+ee00e0ee000 HALE, DIANE 12550 SW mac= LILY CIRCLE TIGARD OR 97223 .1S133DA4O4100 00000000000 .460444144.4 ASIZ r ARYAN 12540 SW GLACIER, LILY OR TIGARD OR 97223 15133302. =O43OO 41,10190 e N 12560 GU IL! 8946 SW ' Dot MVP i200 PORTLAND 97219 1S134CA- -00602 aeeser�i °Jooeeene.wew o00 GERDES, RAi NDALL L & AEBR'A, L 11955 SW NORTH Dawn TIGARD CR 97223 w 1S1340Ar.006f4 a ..ea•eee.4e.ia..a .Uea SLAVERS, GREGORY A AND COPPER D 12015 SW NORTH DAKOTA. TIGARD 97223 1513cA r 4 00603 e.eee�a.0...0 ►aee�o00,, r FZWA, PETER A DIANE C 1:485 SW NORTH DAKOTA T/CA D 17223 251340...00605 screeseDe9eoe�y��iodsisa BODFORD, ci R E ED /GEAOR C 12045 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 1s134c A -GO606 ol44.44 TRDS. SELL, E E �\ 12050 SW NZAWITA CT TVARr'r OR 97223 iS1340Aa,006O8 ee «ee4eeeeeee4 4 eee40 TAYLOR', LORRAINE J 11990 SW NANZANITA TIGARD OR 97223 a 1S134ehs"00607 0 mew . e e o. i n al r ei XIWSTLER, c L T JR IcAtmtEEM N 12020 SW NANZANZTA � TIGARD OR 97223 1S134CA 40609 eee414a444e4e•44444444 WINC'DBsTER, DANIEL L & C.O+L 1252 SW STEPRImS9R it9 PORTLA O OR 9721' 151340A- 00620 44644440404 . 44.4 eR a STORM, dAny L AND JAN 1 ARIE 11965 SW NANZANITA COURT `, IWilit D OR 97223 1s174 C d ,40 6 q 1 4 6 . 4 4 " " 4 4 6 4 6 4 6 4 4 4 4 MANS, ! IONNE FJi 11995 SO MAWZAWIttk OT TIGARD OR 91223 16`134 00612 000.00 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ae4 elidtXj RICH A AND NANCY S 15134 dh . r 0061 3 404444444044440444646 13tRWl TT, Rittpu I t3, ROAt WEST G LTD ,moo • • 1S134CA®00600• � e r o .. • • • • o . • c w' WILLIAMS, . BE= B JOYOS 11000 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S134'A 0060 •00e0e••*00••00••0000 WILLIAMS, JaMg 11000 SW 12 .S'I.V TIGARD OR / 97223 15134CA -02300 •eoeaoee....•.•••se. LERSEILL, ROBE i' FLEMING ItA, MARIE 3SW NORTA DANOTA SST TIGARD 97223 1$1344ci,-03000 B LS11 , li 1C TONYA M 1198) SW .!0RII! DA O A TIGARD OR 97223 15134813 -07201 ..... a TRINITY CHURCH OP THE EVANGELICAL, RlL, CHURCH OF NORTH A3+CRIOA 10900 S6$ 121ST Aw TIGARD OR 97223 1813450 -9000 1 . • . r .o WOODSPRING CONDO UNIT OWNERS BY LBA PROPERTY CO 3016 SE P/WE WREET PORTLAND OR 97234 15134890002 ... Haile MICHAEL 1,7 10955 S;'► 121ST T1",GARD OR 000 A 10 • to • 0. e II o• e o.• o b ... • W Ose.04,44410‘104.00coiiido 97223 1513480-90004 .... B0WJ RS REBECCA A 10945 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S134B - ,90006 ...................... LSHMAN c RAYMOND a/DALAL 5 635 IRON MTV stIrn LAKE 0sW G0 OR 97034 15134Bc-90008 0010440066 BAR, NAMI A 10925 St1 121ST TIGARD OR 9723 15114CA 00b' o•••r.uwe•e.aeM♦.•�• WILLIAM , ► u 1.3000 SW ;121 TIGARD OR ; =' r 97223 JCICE 151.34c -0u0 16 .• a...• WILLIAMS, MIRY R ■. 11000 SW 121ST �' TIGARD OR 97223 15134ca -6290U r• .se +•me r ••r•e•� BUTNER, ROBXN G AND FDA 12020 SW NORTH DAKOTA TTGAR0 OR 97223 1313483- 07200 .....4•0004000000400. TIGARD EVANGELICAL 10900 Std 1215 V TIGARD OR ; "9 7223 15134BA.- 072 1' •• e s r L ..... TRINITY COUR; I OF THE EVANGELICAL CIWRCT1 OP NORTH AMERICA ,.,/ 10900 01ST AVENUE TIGARD /q 97223 1513480. 90001 ••..e.e•.e•o.e.e.iteee OTTEL, ROBERT F AND NARK F 10957 1.1111 121ST TIGARD OR 97224 151314450. 90003 .. BU ONO ...O, RANDY J AND onvABA a SEMI 3I. 109 ROAM/DOE RD" SAN OARLOM CA 94070 151348C -00005 o.s.aeesre•ii►ee.•ors•m RUSS , dOwRT D' S MAUI N 8323 s 47= AVE Ps RTLA'ND OR • 9709 181341 0..9000N or.d oid as 'a. ATICIMS a RAN 2092/ SW -121ST TIGARD OR 9$223 0000.00.0® 1s:13480_90009 .• u +ooboaUa.00000040 e WESTERN _ UNITED LIFE ASSURNCE $'a' Rifril T 10911 SO 121ST Ava VIGARD OR 91213 '•4 r, ,s r TIGARD 01t '. 97223 • 1S134BC -9Q 013 •r eeA•os %e•es• QUEEN , MILDRED fM 10907 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S134GB- •04000 ••r.•ou 0dr•e o • • • e • • e0• it SCHOENFELD, TERRY LYNN 12210 SW, NORTH DAKOZA TIGARD OR 97223 1S1340144200 rP +ew+ br• •••r O.. r.OTT RV JOHN L & DORETTA L . 7240 SSW NORTH DAE,YrA ST x a WARD OR 97223 1S134CO5300 WMG, TWIG= 111105 SW =NY TIGAR1 OR e 0. P 0 0 0 P % Ys • %.e • 0.0. P% 0 • M imp ?Alm V CT 97223 15134 B 05701 sf 0 0 P 0 •''e O %• 0. 0,r • e b % O r F A S a GEORGE ° 1 JR AND tiARGARET R 1110 SW TONT CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S13401.4590 P S AP �+ .'� eT. e r e O e Q% Ex • A! S A P! •. ROBLE ROBERT C AND sO 12430 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIM OR 97223 1S1340D 06100 ooespeosecoscoefirsoosoo AULDi d RID C & SMITHQ PATTI FATE 12450 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S134CB 06306 •OYOY a %m• O BELL FLAY TRUST 12470 SW t4ORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 1S134CS 06500 SPEZSh.,, sub & afiRmEN dd 14635 SW SASE LANE TIGARD OR 97224 466344•6s6w 'S1340146601 01 GLENN, jACQUELINE 12500 SW NORTH DAK 1S134C0ICl0390 P .............4.00. GUSTS, HAS DAVE, INC 19105 NE SWY 240 NEWBERG OR 97132 l btl +eYPd +•. �.5134� 01100 a IBBS trCLLIA2 RANDALL AND THRYN ANN 1222 ►:c SW MATH DAKOTA TIGARD ' OR 97223 1S134C••04300 Yr %srr•�'Ya•.aYwr•eL`an0 DAVIS, ARTHUR B & B GRAM,[, 12260 SW NORTH DAWITA TIGARD OR , 9 %ts223 1S134CBU O5 00 JOHNSON , WAR E/DMORAH G 11100 SW TONY CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S134GB- 05800 q PIA JOHNSON, ?AM $ AND DEBORAH e 11101 i =KT :T TIGARD OR 91223 1S134m~66000 O + e CAROL 1244r EV ;NORTH DAKOTA . S'Y" TIM M) ObR 97223 4 (i 41004041i. 1S134C —06200 0.0•00444446400444044° taktriOND ` 00, ;x. 13, SW9 ORCHID potalaigb R 47211 "1513401606400 ••isebd;o ,e .oW.e. e6'6. 4:4 SICSIILD, IC 12480 au NORTE UAiWTA ST TIO CR 99223 151341 9-00600 be4GY•b.itaes DontEt HAS tNO 16231 S O l R taluthcg OREGON dITT OR 0704' O • 1513 14114134C1146100 R . 44 �.y e d .11/NGKIND VERNB HAS. G wsdi0• *"q'd,0, M1 LLZQ i1► Opv Qom Oamff X$ u4Iltddifs SO9 aliv a iisaZia iG a i innL6 u® MIDI& 116 gals LVi3►6 • O'� 'N .0oora01'l1° acme° �' avnTsT T<�ZL6 40 00VPIX .NPVId TaXtZT ,SCTTT 006:90_00t101 ?t SZZZ6 /�_�y■ td®�!w�l /y OIX YY/OWa i(JIt'gM MS SLT$_+,T a s ti! Y o s o. qJ a M o o• p a o'rr r ar QO 6QQ• govog s 6, M afi N 4 r7 . S3 SW':/ 0S OLTtT ' y 7 721110:01 .'; ioStmor sd...*r.n =_ OO6L0° !SEtSt eZZL6 UO atIVSIX ▪ awn to Otttt .�:.. r•4.. '..WY.b.�.Y Q0L404410tETST EZZLe�,;) if HO MVO= Q• WtIS ° 000.00 #.or..° ° °""" 00SLO-110tETST EZZL6 ZO ouvslz d IELISZT MS S9ttT a IMulawni 9 if A Off` HD *MAW ...".or.o oo.or..m.• QOtLO O)Ei6si.. EZZL6 ��yy OEroO °Wqawla KrZ xoa Od EXIOTaW00 w d ad o*; `717800 040°°°°00004'0040°" OQTLO.eUr4trEsT gZL60 Oi OT vxO1iVU =won ..SSt►ZT pZZL6 VO aVVOII 7,3 ILLVZT LAS OZtT i3 auTomily ► OblW i"s'f S '' VV7 T 4M'8Yaq.eo000000...Y,® OQ900.,!L1r1YE sT EZZL6 110 GI WL °Ted SIPZX MS STITT r Xanigiur °OOdQS OOtOO._ OptC O 6 C ZZ..L6 1O ouval& ROW7d Hatort RS SSZTI 0 umugo °$I w. o 0 0 o n. o o. 4 a•,' o. q! !! o o sa o ze®.ygoteisic C'EEL6 �1J M Tq ■w HO cI ave S3 SZT Q6ttI U °X .o!i.000r.00.00q 00064'110. HIST VZZL6 `? autsqx it SZT kV OSTTt • • . r . O' r . • YM OOo C fl Ett 4 ELtL6 IWO oullot& • ,alSZT MS OTttT - '?, ZEIVIN ' XPX77 t o . • r Y', a . O Q ..... • d ..... �- O 0O9LO4W010iiu 6s {.. EZZL6 11 oavalz. '• Td HXSET 14 Stttt r ADSVII Mai d J 'i%alt 00,L0 080,rMT EZZL6 OII yy CI 1' L' LNG' 2O r,7e ... r ...... A.Y N r a ... • OOno....03,Etst EZZL6 HO WWII V' VU 'MHOS MS Stfrrt rw0oc..orrr0'r..Y'P•••. 000L0 TOp`ESllr Ha HQ/7A itts 09tZt X "[Maio aio W 'at 1.'�g3�"Qg�/� c �ol��iIfS� JxaiT 1t�1� 011181931 .n W.Y 947 WILLOW? OF DR #1305 SP,I+T JOSE CA 95228 1S134CB 09000 srfieiwosso•Y.•.• L88, CHAN HS$ a wis SUNG 11165 S"N 123RD PL TXG tsD OR 97223 1S134C0920 a O. e:.b 1• 1 O e O a '�' *• O• O /' DATIMAN, CRAIG N BONNIE JEAN II 21125 SW 123RD PT TIGARD OR 97223 1313408 - 094,00 .....e••.e0 4seoshoos ANDERSEE!!, ALICE 11100 SW 123RD Pam TI /LlR 97223 18134+3.09600 .sa.Wsla••s••'•e.eeeea ATERSEN, WREN 11130 SW 123RD P. I "•ATOD OR 97223 1S134C8.-09800 eaa@ aOe•ee1 a 1OSaO. PARSONS, JUDITH P 11170 SW 123RD PLACE TIGARD C 97223 13134 1,0000 se voeoasseoeoirea6444 ODELL, JEFF PO SOX 230273 TIGARD OR 97223 1S1,34C22.-1140 0 o e•• e o, 4 o e. ri • e e e.. o* a w o eli o coma, RIB A/1CARBW J 12263 SW MILLVIEW CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S134t4g.11600 a e!. o ai ®o c a 1 o a i e w it s e e R , mem LEE/JUDITH N 12229 SW IKIL L VI t20110 OR 97223 1Si34C B- ii800 e e b 4 e s o s u m u s ®N e b si e e e PARNES s JRI!P'REY G iii StlSA►`1 S? 12163 SW HILIArivai TIGARD 4R 97223 S13' m ae"iei:aaios0 /waioeai. �e,9.A�:!'aCIB 1,2rD00 a ai o a e make SON ,) WILLIAM J AND LINDA R 1S13401-.091 YEE, DENNIS BROWN, trAt1ET D 11145 SW 123RD MAZE TIGARD OR 97223 YI..a a 4110000 +,'4444 • •..e a► 401 �'.. e.0Meiae•. 1�134G8 09300 o O• e o' ar a R HUNT,, THOMAS N AND , JANE N 11105 SW 123RD PLACE TIGARD OR 97223 4'4 S'134CB•`095O0 @s +.•d.a..ai)ee,eeee• P TERBEN, HENRY 3 AND GER A E 11110 SW 123RD PIG TIGARD OR 97223 1.3134+ 09700 oea.aaasaio.e�ws o. SIVEDECOR, HST"NS !fie HELEN N 1115 SW 123RD PI. 'TIGA D OR 97223 18134C8.-09900 o we is e e a a O. a is e b e e e f %, DJJ s GARY R AND ERAINA J S % 4 Tat 14085 SW PLACE BEAVERTON OR 97005 2S13408.41300 •ao...esee.l •oee•ee+p KOVACH, wino= J' /SRIRLRI 12285 SW EILLVIEW CT TIGARD 0a 97223 1S13.0iC 4.1150 somoe1riee.eds•eeiossipo Ham, STEVEN & SSA uns 12241 sw &MLIIEI TIGARD OR 97223 1513408.41700 MOVES p LARRY 12207 SW HILL TIGARD OR e`=.e osslP' "sso'baibe'iwa J PA VIEW et 91223 1.S134400-11900 4444444444.44446444644 ghlett DAR ��I a��! 12161 SW MittliTEW CT TIGA cb OR 91223 151340B-01200i , .. . , ». ,. e o • O i! 0 a * CI c` . e's a oo • b . o AnTRO SON® WI .I - R N JANE 16 HALVORSON ... � �u-I 4� ACZZL6 JSTZT SOEtT 14'.}W94! ISEJVX77, t1f �':r • • •.d/ O M M O /! 111 1 1 • ��1 �., �M. I�t• &, ^EtIi7, ,�Jr..,,, . lI1n4,Y/is'YM'4MyCiII'? £ ZL6 ;; Wf0 Me 110 WWI ,Z;) 01,111,10713M OTZT CUM ClaNti4g �ryq��43Eat s O /.4 M • 1 11 O 1', 1� • R, • • oot Or -d314 PEts � .. �O O+ v, I.S134CA°OOSI2' • • c • • • rF of • r.00000 'Ricans) a AND SOY. ' S 12025 stf N1N zTTA TIGARD OR ' . 91223 1S134B0 90x10 • w eee•O • aatle e(T WASTERS,' 1tiCE1140, : C P1 ' ANN . R 10915 Sol 3,21a Tai R 97223 1813443 - 05601, ear. : +•ee♦e oe...' GLENN, $ 12500 39" ' S DMA TIO4wRD ( 97224 10.t34CU 4.O8$ raweu'.0000 ic 4,, •ooa+e0000 , ,LSY iilsmert BUS=NESSaa' ham: .STS , 947. IotiUi: ' DA #1305 SAX y� aI' 95128 a 1161340111.42008 A � a�ynoworeeaie•.o.aea ►a,e WO „ w J AND LINDA It 730 PAUL ST E 9202' 1S134M-04300 S GL I LILY CAL. JOINT T E BM SW BARBUR BLVD #200 PORTLAND OR 97219 13134M-606 " suR`,r 8Y R ' ' T° TIMING WOK 11529 SIDE ••'w.eoa0b0Mpu4lr 97440 1013480790011 moroo.aia(e r!dyeSIe ei►b, 10905 121ST,,' TIG1 .OR X7223 1S134c&i4 7 c w b r ;o .r. s e r a ai i o e a ,* 12495 TXGARD ', 97223 IS134c0S900 dafS •�tieedrssro;erLi4diloore PATB a Wil ' a tin„ ' H 11180 SW 124TH TIGAltD OR 97223 w 16134»12001 . a.,. s a M0. Siaar9V Rsor it a JAI % Buirovitatacm, xml a Lactitel winvit .730 PAUL Ramat r • ►e. 9'4)21 4. MENEM c/Q ROGER EDWARDS 4500 SS 'muss WAY WACO OR 97635 MAMA ,San, 14550 SW 'TIGARD OR TREE 97224 dAL L RY 12356 SW 132M TIC at 9/223 BILL Ivriritgi ae aL ASSOC. I 12555 3W tint, BLVD TIit0 C 9/223 Y e. co 11174 SW SUKKE RI AKE DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S133AD-4.5300 oeoeo•s•oeooes.•e.eso HEREOTTI, PAUL VINCENT & MARY RUTH 11143 SW SUMMEItLAKE DR TIGARD OR 97223 15133AD -15500 •.... .. •oo.••o•••ns AWEIDAH SAED H AND ARAB S 11187 SW SUMMERI AKE ' R TIGARD OR 97223 15133DA -04000 i0NSas••.4eeee BLOOM, PAUL k1FitVIN NICNOL8mBLOO1" , SUSAN 12530 GLACIER LILLY CIRCLE TIGARD OR 97223 BRENESTHAT d.. ARGi ' /NA 11152 SW SUMMER DR TIGARD OR 97223 15133RD- 45400 i••c es m•si e•q.•e• BELL, CHRISTOPHER D & ,CATHERINE 11161 SW SUMMERLARB DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S1 33D -03900 RUD ISHAUSER, JUDY s �c L s s o e i • u +r •ems 'o • • • 4735 SW TROY PORTLAND OR 9/219 a•••• 115133DA -04100 i•sceevai•ssaso•46•so :. AZi¢Z, ARMAN 12540 SW GLACIER LILY CR TIGARD OR 97223 1S133DA -04200 •,o eeeeeeeeseekiee HALE, DIANE' 12550 SW GLACIER LILY CIRCLE TIGARD OR 97225 16134CA -00602 s••e..00reos.e GE IDES, RANDALL L & DEBRA L ).1955 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 eeoe 18133DA °04300 ••••6e•eeeeeeo46e1060 12560 GLACIER LILY 8948 SW EAR UR BLVD #200 PORTLAND OR 97219 0 6 0 • � S I8134CA- -00604 o s e s e s 0 , e' •. • e e e o s e. e s SLAVENS, GREGORY A AND TOPPER 1201'5 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 15q�u am, 134 ,.yi,..00606 ssee.es.s.eeess•ee o TRUSSELL4 JANETTE M 12050 SW ;MANZANITA CT TIGARD OR 91223 1S134CA- 006013 . eei.eeeeeeeeeee. eee TAYLOR, LORRAINE 11990 SW MAN2ANITA TIGARD OR 97223 1S134CAi =00610 e..•.ee.eeeeaeee STURM; (' RY L AND JAM MARIE 11965 SW PIANZAkNIT" t CaURRT TIGARD OR §7223 15134CA 00603' 4 e u..•.. m •0,.a•...••.e FRANZWA, PETER A DIANEG 11985 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 18134CA -00605 sae0e•0440• a ry.,eeee BODPORD, CHARLES AL/RED/GRACE ',G 12045 SW NORTH %KOTA ' ST TIGARD OR 97223 A� =0060 1S134C 7 ooaess•ee•o 6 o.nee•• e KINSTLER, CARL dr' eiR KATHLEEN 'M 12620 SW UANtAlsiltA CT TIGARD OR 97223 15134CA -00609 o.ra.ee ee.a ee n WINCHESTER, DANIEL L C CAROL J 1252 SW S'EPIOaNS0N RD' k40RTLAND OR 97219 • 1$134 *t0.611 . deee e's eied o.,F'la 1s134GA00612 e•ee adieeeaees.e CLARK, RIC }IARJ) A A D N;P CY S ADAMS, xiOt H 11995 SW IA A i2 At+iXT �°T 1XGAR1) OR 91223 133.�.34t�!►"°'OQE1.13 •Y,o,,00eeoeale•e se•i.a BU�R1�"E�T b, E tLP i N, s1 NOI TI WsST 3�tJ i1 : NG LT'D 18,134CA9 -00600 'e••s♦♦so•••s••o , fa• WSLLIAms, HENRY ' & JOYCE 11000 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 1$134C'A —f 0615 o�.oqu ••�.s•e•es WILLIAIM3 I JOYCE 11000 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 13134 .4.02800 0..4..4... • • • 0• 04• LARSELL a, ROBERT FLEMING LP.►RONA MARIE 12040 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S13.4CA -03J00 •. « +o..,•s +.e•ar••.o•• NIELSE) , MAR J' & TONY'A M 11980 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 S13411Dw072f1 • • . • •. • ... • . • 0 • TRINITY CHURCH OF THE EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF NORTH AHERICA 10900 SW ` 121ST AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 1S134BC -90000 0.000600• ♦eae•.4e00o WOODSPRING CONDO UNIT OWNEqS D L!3A PROPERTY CO 801,2 5E 9,1810 STREET VORTLANYJ OR 97233 134'90002 e • • . ,► • ♦ • . • .. 0 tl moms, SAE, mtCAAEL Y 10955 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S134B0.40004 0 e .. • .' 0 BOWERS; REBECCA l 10945 SW 121ST Pr TIGARD OR 97223 .- p..44)a•.• 1S134B6-900A 0 0 ^ 6 ................... tl • LIEF MAlt , RAYMOND 0/DAL S 635 IRON MTN BLVID LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 1513480- 90008 100•0.0.0.0.004.000 HACKER, NAOMI A 10925 SW 1215T TIOARD OH 97203 ry s 1$134CA- 00614 1•r,0.OS•••O ••a••� WILLIAHS a HENRY 8 JOYCE 11000 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S134CA-'00616 •••e..oe•0.. WILLIALIS y HENRY 13 11000 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 r • O I •. • 4) •. 1S134CA -02900 eo••440 00..•••......• BUTNER, ROBIN G AND GLENDA 12010 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 1S134BD- 07200 00,00•000000.0.000 os. TIOARD EVANGELICAL CHURCH 10900 SW 121ST AV TIGARD OR 91223 1,5134DD- 07202 •••• „.• •• 0.6 • •e T ?INIT! CHURCH OF THE L YANGELICAL CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA 10 °00 SW 121ST AVENUE V TIGARD R. /� q 7223 1Sd:',34BC -90001 ••r•o..•••••ooeq••••• OTTA, ROBERT F A1IID 10957 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 47224 151340 =90003 •. es•� ••000 .do•• BARBA'RO, RACY 3' AND CODFF 'BETH' L 109 ROCKRDGE RD SAN CARLOS CA 94070 13134B0 -90005 040440044004044.a."" RUSSELL, ROBERT D Fc MARY t 5323 SW 47TH PORTLAND OR 9 `.i 219 13134/1000007 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 6 0 4 4 0 0 4 4 tAktiq 10921 sW 121sT TIGA OR 91223 1513450 -90000 6040414aiiii40 044 0416 WESTERN UNITED LYFg ,ASSURANCE CO XistitY, ROTH T 16917 SW 121ST AVE TIGA tD OR 91223 • ANNA 10915 SW '121ST TIGARD OR 97223 1413480-900,12 a•♦••••••♦•••�o••o♦•4 QUEEN, MIL! RE d M 10907 SW '121ST TIGARD OR 97223 '..`1S13405- 04000 ♦s:a•ss•••rd•s♦N•••iss` SCHO NFELD, TERRY LYNN 12210 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 2S134CB- 04200 � e c•• s e•• POTTER, 3!DNN L 0 Y,►ORETT3 L 12240 SW' NORTH DAKOTA GT TIGARD OR 97223 10905 SW 121ST TIGARD AR 1813405 - '03900 CUSTOM HOME ' 8Y 19105 NE W'! 2 NEWBERG OA 2 • • ♦ d • • oy . a . s o ♦ .11 • DA, , INC 40 97132 ].$134C5" -04100 •ooi•o•♦•d••.e• r • GIBES c. WILLIAM AT`., MALL AND KATHRYN ANN 12220 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD OR 97223 •e•so•s 1S134G8. -04300 '00.44••oo•'•e••.404 ♦i DAVIS, .ARTHUR E & E GRAS 12260 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD_ 'OR 97223 1S1340J3.-05300 e•isesa'��s.isewsa•is•• WAAGE, TRYGVE H AWD ALICE 11105 SW TONY CT TIGARD OR 972!3 1513402- 05116, ieeeos'••'b•o•sso.•io • GRAVES, GEORGE W JR AND MARGARET R 1110 SW TONY CT TIGARD OR 97223 151q �i y ... .. err 11yy �y 340► - 05900 .,,....,..,..,....00. RONLF, ROBERT C AND JEP'E C 12430 SW - NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S134b•406100 0;044 esoeeei••nooessiFs AULD, RICHARD' C & SMITH PM T1 KATE 12450 SW V0RTH D OTA ST TIGARD OR 9722.3 88144 � k'AMZ�.Y T,T,'t�JBT u • .. .. • .. 6�- 3,5134CB 05300 . a :, e . a b . 12470 SW AORTA ) AKOTA T.104g0 OR �y7223 w 1513405 °06500 i♦ ••aoaiseieen•0..0. SREZ A, BYJD & CAAMEU L 14635 SW .... SUNRISE LANE TIGARD OR 91224 1S1340H- '06601 ••i•soibdddoibeolie ' yi GLENN,,JAUELXNE 12500 SW NORTH DAXoTA 1313405 -05700 ♦so•s••cseors••*..•♦• JOHNSON, MARK E/OEOORAH G 11100 SW TONY CT T!CARD OR 97223 16134C11.-056100 a •• s•assii ue•q,w 00 150IN, MARK E AND DEBORAH G 11100 SSW TOMV CT TIGARD •OR 97223 151340, -06000 geoi •ee..ie..es .6.. D0$ " ;S, BRIAN 11 AND CAROL 5 12440 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TiGARD'OR 97223 1313405.06200 'esi &• &soa &goer *• 4 oo WANTLAND 00, TIC 5311 SW OLL :810 PORTLAND OR 9122a� 1S134C9 - 56400 .d•:•.0iv 0,0•00••••• SCUILD a ERId R & LINDA R 12450 SW NORTH DAKOTA HT tIGAAD OR 97223 1$1340, ..06600 .bos ♦suee• •sie•i DQRSEI* HOHES INC 16231 S OAK WREE TJCRR�! "e SL 0LGOLn CITY OR 91045 1i�134Ci�®"0670 o'.•uwdoioiti1tioioe. ♦siti rGUNGRTNO v d�F , °c SOPHXE� ff 1S134C 06800 ••••••••••••••o se ®+ MEYSINC, LARRY E AND . TAMARA H 12460 SW ANTON DR TIGARD , OR 97223 1S 134CB••06900 4 • o • •_ • • • •. • • • e • 0*. • ' BREAUX, ROGER a a u E K 12455 SW NORTH DAW°"rTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 15134CR- -07000 ••••••••.••••••••o• ELSTROM9 ROY N AND AGNES N 12445 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S134Cb•07200 •ed••• «..•Oe•w • . ALTENBOFEN, DAN J AND DEBO .RU EA 11185 SW 125TH PL TIGARD OR 97223 151,3408- 07100 •• 0o tips',..,,•• w••.0 OP 1LL, ROBERT AND A tI 4 TE A ODELL, JEFFREY R' PO BOX 23!243 TIGARD CR 97223 1 134CB'O73o0 •••••••••••••• e PRANK, GREGORY A & EIM1 SELY E 1165 SSW 125TH PLACE TIGARD OR '91223 1S134C9 - 07400 0 • A•••••••••••Op•� IRS iN, g1P tK A AND NANCY '3' 11135 SW' 125TH PLACE TIGARD bF,e 97223 1S134fit± �j �y /� CBh07600 s • • • o i • • of e • •. • e • • . • • • e WALLICIL, ELAINE L 11110 S W 125TH PLA CE TIGARD OR 1S1 • BY BUSINESSLAND AT9 1N: SUSAN WOOD 947 WILLOWL' AF DR #1305 SAN JOSE CA 95125 10134C2-09000 ........... 6600065000 LEE, CHAN BEE 1ST HEE SUNG 11165 SW 123RD PL TIGARD OR 91223 18134108 -09200 ....-,60........0.... BA TEMAN, CRAIG E A BONNIE JEAN M 11125 SW123RDPL TIGARD OR 97223 1S134CB. 09400 . • . 0.0 0 ... 0 ■•0 • e o ANDERSEN, AZ,T,."'E E 11100 SW 113RD ,PL TIGARD On 9722 1S134CB -09600 PETERSEN, SOrsu 11130 SW 12 %0 PL TIGARD OR 97223 0 0• d O• Oe d d0 e• e d. e e 1O134dB- 0984:, 40 664 .... .• d4: PARSONS,. JUDITH P 31170 SW 123Rd PLACE TIGARD Ott 97223 1S134d8 -10000 eae�ni..o.b«0ee. e e ODELL, JEF14 PA ;OX 23027; TIGARD OR 97223 18134011'1 - 11400 04ee0104ee1e400en4e04 0'_000 OLDFIPLb RIC} ARD A /KAREN J 12263 SW M,;LLVIEW CT TIGARD OR 97223 1513'4CB -11600 • e0O «. ed0..0 e KEELS, RONNIE LEE/JUDITH M 12229 SW 1MILLVIEW CT' TIOARL. OR 97223 1811403,,11800 . Se «e0 ee tE.•;0. BARNES, JEFFREY G 3u SUSAN 0 12183 SW mtLLViR I CT TIGARD OR 97223 11100 SW 124TH TIGARD OR 223 1013408u09100'•.••ep•• «r••eaa • aee YEE, DM'1INIS Ai BROWN, J.A D 11145 SR 123RD PLACE TIGARD OR :41223 1513408.09300 HUNT, THOMAS N AMID Jl 1� 11105 SW 123RD PLACE 1:GARD OR 97223 • • e 15134CB- -09500 04440••000■«••••d•O•• PET' RSEN, HENRY S ANP GEEDA E. 11110 SW 123RD PL TIGARD OR 97223 1S134C2 -0970 ..ee¢•ot....o «. SNEDECOR, ESTES & }LEN N 11150 SW 123RD PL TIGARD OA 97223 1S134CB- oC9900 .............. a A O ■ tl •• DUFFY, GARY f AND ERAINA a SWINS'ORD, TOM 1406S SW KENTUCKY PLACE SEAVER,TON OR 97005 1 S134C3 -11300 •« 0 to 0 0 0 • e• d e d 0. 0 4. 0 O O KOVACH, GREGORY J /SHIRLE+ Y N 12235 SW MI'LLVX,EW OT TIGARD OR 97223 1s134CB' 11500 ee.•e••• 4e«•6oee•eoe BEAN, STEVEN JAY A TERESA LYNN 12241 SW k ILLVXEI; TIGARD OR 97223 16134CE, -11700 K.Eat ' ,'X, LARRY 12207 SW MILL TX13?ARD OR ebe•s6000+,yeo4eec G60e4a ii ski tllill$111. J VIEli CT 91223 13134CS 11900 « «••e yd see .• «detiewiei. 1013400 °1200 ema ed•e.► es o owe • HALVORSO Ne WISGLTAtM +7' Al!bD LINDA° R 0000 HAMILTON, DAAIR`et L /LORI Jo 12161 SW MILtiv EW OT TIGARD 011 ` 9721 1013408 -12001 dltmetboe:i�t►'ea« «Ofd «�i HAS VOPSON, W1L IIAi R & 'Aa tOitiVotts1014.-' WItLIAt J d ESCONL$IfO, CA 92027 1513►�0B 12100 .• � �+ �re•�,o�►o••proorae ZENM, DI NXEL RICHARD AND 10ILLIAMS, a0HN W a «!UANIT R MARX ELLEN LE lOX 11303, N6 121ST AVE 12149 W NILLVIEW CT TIe7 � OR 977 TIGARD' OR 97223 ` M 11965 SW 'MA1NZANTIA COURT TIGARD OR tH7223 1S134CA- 091212 CLARK, RIHOMD A i #N bbr'. t *o•s•a••�•••s• NANCY 12025 SViTMANKAX'kT4 OT TIGARD OR 97223 18134 C- 9003.0 0.4 *••4••e,•,•fe•e•••••• MASTERS, RICH Z C . AND ANN ,A 10915 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S134.y q CB- x'5501 • . • • 6 . 6 0 6••o•••e se GLENN, ACaUEIJINE 12500 SW `NORTH DRAMA TIGARD Ok 97224 1S134CA- 00613 6 d 41 • • It « • • s • 14 • RW,41 TT, RALPH M ale NOR TH'aifE, ,,T FUNDING ` LTD P 0, P0X,'`11529 rsudtn 97440 ••••••••; 10.34B0,- 90O11. <e44441444•4!•4,4•4•• „•oito MOW/bill , ROBERT P/ IMOGENE H 10905 SW 121ST TIGARD OR 97d ,121. 1S134013 08800 6.66 4 ♦444a.0e44444•64444oe WOOD a sU6 °"a'76 ='tLOA. BY BUSxNESSLAND ATTNs SUSAN mob 947 WE Lusirmittr bit #1305 SAN JOSE _CA • , • 9512+ 1S134C16.12000 •es••6. •••••• ••p••e„ IiIIMASOit, WILLIAM J AND 730 Ie;a ST ESCONDIDO LA 92027 1€1,34CB'"06700 A•aa•••c••lr•m• ••• • =MAIM , WEEVER . & SOPHI % I A : `. ,. JOHN '2 & MAR', C 12495 SW ANTON DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 16134CD+•05900 •e•)b•dd•'•• •m••ae, G PAOL, AWAY T tz. ,611i4PA,OEN' S 11180 OW 124TI PIS TIGARD OR • 91223 10340 u1200i. • • i ti i • its! • • • e • • • • • O • O' J e HAL'VOR3SON rWX LLT1 I A & JANE iWtoRSON, WILLIAM J �e LINDA RUTH • 730 PAUL ST E6010 71:6 GA 92027 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] 55.54 145` $ ee. L::o! 1C 7700 � 13S ° 1100 44,p' C LL80 TAX LOSS 137. • - 33 43 3500. 1.001 TRACT '` • 32. °. ; G 800 is ?7O5 ra. , eg'E - a�g06 1200 `r�� 0 34 t3 oie LAKE �4 35 0- 0. 70 60 .: 1500 a is 36 39 w . ze o 7"4„22 stns$ 3400 3 29 a 3123 %S, •3 ,� 3000 32t w 56 ; `�, 12 0 its 3 54 se ° LTt UAW its 345 �� 4 35 GO 491:0 510a 5 3 t 70i 34 31 4-700 NA FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES • ONLY NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE TIG D SW1/4 SECTION 34 T IS WASHINGTON COUNTY 9iiEGQN SCALE I "= i001 SEE hi 4P I � , I S . I 380 51O. 535 534 • 5 21 0 c o 7,4 n : 3o la p (4.- 1..5, P , I Mme is� 7 a.00 7O.5: _ Rs432. a0 W CS. 1047 t $2,00 71. 00 ° _ t 71.27 ,g+ 5i 4 515 1' 516 ZS;O ei .0 1 ?III': _ 130.0 EAST 0 25 27 T4.00 71.0a • „s. Oa 3.515 si 3247 2$ wav;let 3E..O0 512 Ia,5T � .� 6 s.03 WEST 133.31, 504 54 51. EAST' & . • . T5.CO 7 -CO' C.3. -l99 CO sr //I 00 3100 120 so SO . .. tt s0 74.30 • 70 • 74.E 5600 5700 • 56O u36744 ,1 • 30 3 3700 . ` 40.0S 3400 3500 a.. • }` • ti z 1700 14 2, o0 33S• ° °0; 8"E 'mils, eCo [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] TO: • 'i,M. �►. • g 55T FOR COMMENTS DATES June 11 1992 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SU8 1VTS X0N SUS 92 -0008 JJED L , LOEi NNT PiDR 92w0002 ViiR 92 -0014 SCHULZ NDW. D -N um= (NPC #7) 1 requeat for approval of the following development applications: 1; Subdivieion preiirainary ,)1at /Planned Development conceptual plan approval to divid = a 7. es acre Parcel into 51 lots rangin g between 4,700 and 6,800 Square feet in Oise; 2) Variance approval to allow an increased lot width to depth ratio Of 2.8 unit .5 to n ®n.. . normally required, to 1 on One lot where a ratio REVIEW CRITERIA: Comm of y 2 5 top 1 . Code Chapters 15.82, 8.80, 18.88, 18.15 0, 18.160, and 18:164. LOCATION: 10975 SW l21dt Avenue, between Sew 121st Avenue and SW North Dakota Street, north Of Anton Park I. (WCTM 181 34GR, tax lot 100) ZONE: R-7 PD) (Residential., 7 unite /acre, Planned Development) ' The R.-7 zone allows dingle family detached /attached residential unite, duplexes, public Support faciliti;e ®, mobile home p arks, redidential treatment homes, faMily day care, home occupations, te mporary used, residential Fuel tanks, and accessory structurea among other Uses. Attached *id the 8]te Plan and applicant °a statement for our review. `rem infernnation supplied by varieue departments and ages.''3iee and from other information available tco ou A staff, a report and ;recommendation will be prepared i and a decision will be rendored on the proposal h the near future: Tf you .rah application, 22, 1992 . You l�aay uss the ace provided d belowoorr attach a separate J� to to r turn your centnont ;3. p .. lshoine the staff contact P _ o If ou. are unable to �+® ond h the above date • �.a�aaete in waiting asp. Soon as noted below with ye �n �t cofl enta and co>nf irm your c my e isaible. y have � y i ne regarding thite matter, Contact the Tigard If ou ��q� a an �'u� ®tio g p .p . PHONE: Planning 223 639-4171. �e 8rti�ent, PO RRx 23397, 13125 SW Hall R..:wd. , Tigar , OR 97 STAFF CONTACT: -,.... 4erk`y Qf f a.. :...,� PLEASE CMEO( THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT .. ,PPLX s we have reviewed the propodal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: W Name 01' imen0n Commenting s Phone Number: , bkm /8U$92 -08.8 .i r Building OPficitel /Brad It. Ti lard Water District ' 6777 S►? Burnham St. Tigard, CA 97223 School Dist No. 40 - (Beaverton ) PO 200 OR 97075 School bist. 23J (T19ard' 13137 SW Pacific ,stwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin valley Slater District 6501 SW Taylors Fern. Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 • AiPPECT31, JURISDICTIONS Wash. 'Co. Land Us. C Tranep. 150 1N. Pirs;rt 1lw�e. Hillsboro, CR 97124 Brent Cutitia Erin Martin Joann Rice Scott lung Bred Eberle Mize Morreson City of Beaverton Jim Bee 20 Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 .�.,�. City of Rig City City Manager 15300 SW 116th Zing City, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego eity Manager Lake Oswego, OR 97034 3tafes Highway Division - Bob Doran Ps Box 25412 P,)rtiend, OR 97225.0412 N �r'+�.1.CTe� �. • SPECIAL A, r, Telephone "*r hush Wells 12460 SW Main St. 1i , OR 97223 - ylt "'" Natural Gas ScottPalmer Scott 3 Zscon it Ave. Portland, OR 97205 TCI Cablevisilon of Ctlregon - Aliikea Ballock 3500 SW Bond cat. Portland, OR 97201 Columbia Cable (Prank Stone) - 14200 S f Brigadaon Ct. Bativerton, 0-1 97005 6. 3TA.TW AGENCIES Aero nautice Div: (ODOT) Engineer Board of Health I ish & Wildlife Parke A Recroatibn Div. SObdiwi ®ion D Slu ff ervisor - 060h4 of Energy - Dept. of Environ. Quality 7 FEDERAL AGENCIES Coypu. of Enigidu.:arn Poet Office DLCD (c"PMa. only) 1175 Court Sit« Salem, OR 97316.0590 othetr City of Durham .'°°. city Manager ' 17160 SW Upper Boonee Perry Rd. Tigard' OR 97224 , City of Portland •"""'° Pl+annin0 Director 1120 SW 5th Portland, OR . 9'1204 000T LidWien'Rebmann 9002 SE.McLoughl:in Blvd. Bi,2.waukie, OR 97222 Portland General Elec. Brian Moore '14655 SW 01d. Scholia lfry . tdav n, ch 97007 tro Area., Communications Jason Rewitt T.fin .Oaks Technolocy Center 1015 NO 169th Place 0-6020 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4086 US Webt Pete Nelson' 421 SW Oak St...,'; .., , Portland, OR 972 ©4 bOGAMM - Diviai'n of State Lands Ccmnerr;s4 Dept. - 14:H. Park - Other. W w" oT ER Southern Pacific Traneportaltidn Company Duane 14 Forney, PLS Prlh j i.t b;igineer 400 Nis Eth Avenue, R. 324, Unioh Szatioii I,ortI nii6, OR 972:39 C 07 TIC e TREE, REMOVAL Permit No, fz„,f7 A COP7 OF THIS FORM MST ER CLEARLY POSTED ON SITE OR IN THE POSSESSION OF TEE PERSON REMOVING THE TREES DURING ALL TREE REMOVAL ACTIVITIES. 1. GENERAL TNFORMATIO?51 PROP .RTI ADDRESS /LOCATION LOCATION WEST OF SW121 ST AVE. - NORTH OF ANTON PARK _ SUB,D VISION TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO 1S 3ACD , TAX :,OT 00 PROPERTY OR� -DEED HOLDER *MARTHA SCHULZ ArankESS 14550 SW HAZELTREE TERRACE CITY APPLICANT * ROGER EDWARDS ADDRESS 4500 KRUSE WAY LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON CITY TIGARD OREGON SIGNATURE S E_ATIAC IED t. ,, FR. PHONE 639-- 3341 97 .SIGNA... BUSINESS NAME PHONE 63 -26660 zap 9035 * When the owner and applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record v . lessee 3, a possession of written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner w t s writ en authorization. The oorner (s) must sign this application in the space provided or submit a written authorization with this application. ri (S) FO Rr vAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SUBDIVISION IMP! r;� F.,MENTS w.n.lamrl 4211•■•••WOie■w,A■14 �92`O'92-0008 .. , .n 3. RELATED SUB R USE APPROVAL CASE NUMBER (if applicable) 4. Please attach a 'photocopy of a tax Etiap or site plan to the sack o &E..tbis. forma A larger site plan may be submitted if necessary. to adequate ly a,' d•, dre., ss .. .. the aoaEC tree . wr T(e Ste plan shall s4dOdn0a;u. «.,rb« w..aa: nom« Ib'.NYwi,ri:uY.+uP"uUyk+M•«++ ) The idaction of.the:.subject site 2) p d ; ar existing structures 3) Ail.. easements, _dedications,., streams,, wetlands,„k„etco. a0.,aa........w�.ayy�,�.i 4) All trees over six inches in caliper Elite, ame cured fours ! eet ... n! v,.. l.. w.1.Y...W.duxrvwi+,.�hrtrh+;k 5) Basic ident fig ation of tree types. �Ag ,, p 5. � lease attach a. narrative detailaa a tree rOteion plan for Al be reserved on Site. tie yes , ao Apptoval% 'Date 40.41„ 1 "aryl aril .th. Vir';��. k ' la m yji �w.++51�i 0.F V' 1141,4V ro' STA C0 OREGON County of Waihingf; on 9 City Of Tigard ) cis, d •''i�i��! �11�u sayt (Please print) dieing f'i'rst duly *swox&i /affirm, o t, oat a romarYo•aw fog, The City of Tzkg'ardtl C» egon. ®,.�_„ That I served ENTICE or P efiAt3 FARING 0 -Irhat 1 seiored 'NO IO Off' °iECISION R: It mrw�.` �,�. City o€ Tigard P :arning hector'' ✓ 'T &g d Plana tack ifl3ion, p Tig ~d Hearings OffL er TigarCI (LLt � O�,lY Cil A Oozy (? blLC hegaz'in ; Notice/Notice f De kieion) o2 whim ie & La hed (eked rlcl1;i.� l � w �� 3.�hillbS,� e��ti�� ►1 �e� �r, �� dn� ' � s!i ®tea s►g,, tt�e_ �Lta e, nd� as ehe�ll l s m � said, notice NOTX <,'.,a DTCT CON ads her to at�rach+ette was Poet -' ' n axn ask �.oPriate ugh etin . hoard on th day* ci! , ' . 44. 1,1. a.., e, ,,, and de sites b �.�..... ad Yt �:� �hra ��lited �$�,;�t�e .�1 �n �� da �f l9 postage a aid. °rr';'1)scribed t3Vt.Z swOrnieffirM a "o on ti ►i NOTA: Y PUVILIC OP O GON oy d. ii3ion Expire'3 s • et, do CITY TIf1AMD Waao,eh Lng Ln, County Nr tCE OIL FINAL ORDER BY PLPANING COMMISSION COnaerni,ng Case Number(a) sus 92- -®OOH; /1 R 92- -OQCD2 92gOO 1 Name of Owner: Aag ha Sc iul % Name of Applicant: J. Nfeme• er :....... 3. Address 4500 SW Kruse av � ,. City Lake Oswege Stato ®R... zip 07 35 4. Address of Property: 10975 3W Av enue Tax Map and tot Nc (s) .: 1S1 34CB tax lot 5. Reque;Gt b x` a ueet fora MYah of ic► e3 t9-1 .ow .na v 10 Appiicatlonet Planned Desvelo�ament c ► cgptugl plan ppro al to divide a 7.85 acre parcel _ w g ^ t 4« 7cla and !_ . 8®0 eauaret fee size • 2 Variange �a°'° va1 +-�_ allow an increased lot 7arc. l into_ 51 7 ot® ran inex �e�Vr ,.�.. width i�:a .„,gep' ratio of 2 on p ejot_Ehere a , o o€ 2: t o 1 is n s;•1 ,., regua Led. APPLICABLE _ REVlEW' CRITERIA: Conrnuni.ty: psvelol ent Cade Chapters_ 15.52 18. t9Q. 11.8L_ 18.150 ;� 8.160, „and_ 18,164. Zone: R-7 (PO) (Resideutial, 7 units/acre, Planned Development) The R-7 residential ounits, ,eiuplexea, public mobile home parks, .� support iEaci]it3.. ®�s, residential treatment homes, family day . care, home occupations, temporary uses, residential. fuel • tanks, and accessory structures among Other uses. 6. Action: s Approval as requested ec Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Nall, and mailed to X__ The applicant and owner(s) X Owners of record within the regeired distance X f X m affected Neighborhood Planning 9 Or anizatior • Affected govern erexal agenciea 8. Pinto' Decision: THE DECISION SNP At vIN N _Liu9uet 31 1992 UNLESS' AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted i" ndl.n r of fact, decision, aril eta .emetn'4 of condi iort'e dan be Obtained from the Planning D epartmen , Tigard CS; ;y 1312' S i P.O Do z 23347 Tigard, Oregon 972230 • An? party to the eciaion may .rap 1 the . deoi4ion in accordance written with a th 18.32 0 2911(H) and �Secticin 18.32.370 which provides that appeal a ritten appeal ray be filed within 10 days after notice id given and sent a The appal May ,be submitted on C .4-y forms and Md t be accoMpanied by Zhe appeal fee (3.15400) and tr ansCript Coate, (varies 110 to a cnea" i MUM of $500.00). The deedline for filing of an appeal ie 3:30 p ►u a 31� 199 .,, Planning Department, ;�39- 41.'1. questions, pease o�llX • Ci�:y' d ,aeet�.onso. If you have an 1 the of Tigard dr•' moms TUN E ONNISSION R TUB CITY OF 21GANDip MOON iga ding the Plauh' .ug Ct'iaa i®eione ° o m aow of an application by NiemoyerAdwarde fox' 9ubdiNIA.L7w4a of approximately d•95 aorta of land � 1_ i toia�,�.,g t.� •109? 3 SW l2iat amenne in i he \pity of Tigard. O6�til�lm. FINAL OROSR 92-06 SUB 92.0008 N FARR NO.2 SLAY OP TOW 't1OQU8a/T C ASE a ANTON PAS No. 2 SUEDIV1L O1 Su idiv'i o S�?IR 92 00 Llanned ',0evelap ».n►t Review ?Pk)R 92- 003 •Var ,anoe VAR 92 -001J Tea , a leant re east® St&bd vieilora real i as +let /Pl ned l��JMI3�RX $ �P ^�avertop ut tevi concepf�xal plan approval to divide an ai pncyx .mateiy `a'. S5 acre as rcel irate f iftp-two lot® rangini j in size 1,aet**e nn. approatimately 4,000 4nd 7,350 square feet. Isn Otddi1 i.Qnr a Suiudi:viei.o><a yaariance si retpaeate ®1 to tallow Gas!. lot. to have lot depth°' - width ratite © a a►rat i ►toly 2. tc 1 herea�a�, de Section •15.164., .r6tas liiiiitos a� �oktoti ..m best dial haut.O. ±'010* QSS. R.14 1� atandaarcz of 2.5 to 1. 'the . p opoqal ideut Dal. tc thu I overrbor qq y� a �� a pm ' {�y,haaae two of the Anton Park l� ®ol P�.Si1n.��fillg �.°,�'wsti�s��.e�x; � ��.�%�,♦ ��.° Apr._ aubdiai®io . hart ap)prtdva1 has, ea€pired. APPI ;rcAN s • J. 1 iemay 1, c /e toga r 'gd warear 4500 age way •Lake Oswego, O 9703$ • OW4ERo h? d.cbult 14$50 O Iazeltre a Terra cai °i! Card, O egona 17224 Ab NTg Ha r`L,epMcM000gle Aa®s . `Jim ri e 12 55 Sir Mall Boulevaay'd ' ar'd DR 972 ►2 d ai i.+ S` u PLAN DWa dGOAV;9N a ' '.ediw nei tt Ree0eenti i `,ON11114 DESZ.GNA'rt0Na • R4 (PD (R. Oide ►0:al, 7 uar l.:a /acre, P aanned t v'eloji1On overlay zone► ibgAtaONs j.dCTM 131 34DR, I'a�Pd. ICi B � LAt fib ar whit ity D®7.1016 %on a { ch ®" oo 2 .` Plun Polio ,en 2,.1.1 . '�� w 1�' 15� � �a�a'�e iva�, �; 15.3.5® 1v5 a 1� ;ti5 $$a a�*t . e � Pi�r�Na� �;�S81p5 �: > :. a3o3�� P LT NINE COW 3S81C N DN001.100n `;000.4' ua ea= �•n •A lao FINDINGS ABOUT S3TE AND SURROUNDINGS A. LtfiguaraAmt, sahaa Twgsic last 100 contains 7.85 acres in an "L" shape "i; ,th 516 feet of frontage on SW 121st Avenue and 10111 meet of east-west dimension This site is 'tocated on th. =: went side of SW 121st Avenue, approximately. 100 feet north of the intersection of SW 1210t and SW North Dakrca Street. The site is north and east of the fully developed Anton Park No.� I aubd.1;.vision. SW Anton Drive is stubbed into tax lot 100 in two locations fxos'a this euibdvisioaa as illustrated on the attached vicinity map as well as on the preliminary plat. ietin s, ard e;iaructures s Tax lot 100 is presently ,,,vacant and is covered with an o ,d, apparently presently nil-managed fil Vert orchard. A few other mature trees are also P shown on the present in the northeastern corner of the site as preliminary plat. T c VALELy' M f rainnge The site slopes gradually from northeast to southeast. %beau Are no distinct dr. =^inageways on the s,l.tes F. Plan desiwnatfo�n _ ani zonir�a s The site and adjoining properties to the south and nntaBt are designated. Medium Density Residential on the comprehensive PlA ie Flap and are zoned R -7 (PD) (P.esidential, 7 units /acre, planned deve .og =neat ender .; y gone) Tian property was zoned with the planned development overlay zone along with the area that is included in the Anton Park l subdivision (2C 17- 80) OP.nd was previously part of an approved contoptual dev olopinent plan that included Anton Park No I (Files S 10-84 and SAD 5-84). . ._item :n rides Props tAies to the south, east, and west cAntain Single (..tidily rwieidesiic s . The I eadow Creek aptrtmeni ra and the Wcodspriog (".ondothii turns esr*, toct.ti.811 to the north of the Bite ii,o gged gig The rte. dieetai SUbdiviSien pieeliiinar r let /P]: .. .. P anr!�d Develcyent Review conceptual ply' approval to divide the s bje 4: 9aurcel into ; sty two lots ranging in size between approxi nate9,y 40.00 end 1;450 square beet a>e illustrated +on th& prelimtnery plat. The tote are intended for single family residential uSe4 An addition & S bdivision Var;.,nn J a ., aj is r ®�.... ®std to all,o� ,prtase�! lot to have a lot depth.- to-- width retie of to app►a'o tinate . �C `� �.. ti 1 Uvherea>a e on 18 :164.' A , l :try ea tabl iAie5+ a O3amW6 lot dc3pthr- to.6Widt ORDBEI SUB 91 -0008 AN TON PARK NC Il My y0 4. r .1 PAGE M• • n^ �mm standard of 2.5 to lc. The applicant's stateMent frays . that •the variance ce is nodescitated by the location of the satiating eouhxk',;rn: stub of pW Anton Drive in Ant.Qn Park No. 10 The prOposal is identical to the November, 1984 Planning !ionidnietiion PiPProval for pheae "tth) of , .. the Anton Park sa11w11b�Ii'�'i.d�i�rn' (�`i�.esl1' 8 �0. � {fir: and' PD 5-04). �!nalt approve 1i1 has expired ei.nce too much tia�►e , l.a�pesdl , ,aetWeen the development of the trod approved pobaiees of th?a Anton Park eubdivi.aion. The current applicant's engineer also did the design and engineering work for the earliaii approval. The applicant h&e s bmit ; d copies of .the earlier ApproVed preli+ it ary .pint for both ,Abases of Anton, Park Subdivicrkon , as part of the current application *nateriale p , „F bl c a ervices and tiliti.est The proltainaary utility plan proposes that the otbbtl.ivM.a ion be �,2orVed by eXtensiota of existing sanitary aewere from the Veetern 6nd southern. stubs of SW Anton Drive. The sanitary sewers wand d terminate. at r ear tended by Water ;service Would, ,be, mas,nb �ee south of lots �4 and 7� y . � f. i. 'the an eight inch dim Ater water line looping . through the deveilop rent n proposed street coan.n� cting to existing t.. ater lines in Anton Pars No.' I. A g western Stub of'' SW oraa eewaar would ��e extended froth cis the of the .. � ._ . Anton, Drive to a3erve the western po proposed 'ddevelopment It is pro p p � mod. de ve►lopment be . n ogtid�a of that rcr s� 4 ... - ,. d.. provided end tllsat the e � t ®� � f �o�a orn with �' n�. e by aarfact, e e �� >"� Dir�.vre a�outhe"iar SW A,nt�n`l toan existing sto sewer and atormwa; er ` dal •�d:iateteeot3.onrof SW Anton hive and ,aW North Dekot: , Street 11.:qe site has '616 . . 2 - -sat . frontage g SW 121st 1Nvo ru3 functionally classified as a ma jo collector st sit « s 123,st Avenue along the subject property has 30 fete' of right-‘of-way width fro' *. p� �... centerline with- sid9Waalk, urb6 srenterli�:ne and 22 fdbet of anv�enaent from ce and storm, drains. ins trw et connecting The eaa�asli.viel.oE� uio��;�d involve the crea/3ior� of a local �'� the two existing Stubs of sW Anton t14,71 via from the Anton Park Nei 1 subdivision. The prli�lna plat Lndi•.• ate s that a SO foot rig .of- way is intended for this street and that the street Will be oonaschtitucta d i. conformance With City standards. e_ c the prc+poe ®e that a 1� t wide In additi.oxn, tgae t$41i iia plat . peraeatrian ease menu (al) s lead �he boundaardi, �",eet en Leta 70 and 71. The pedestrian a.�eceeaWaay Would proiri de 4. 0Oh nect,d of betweeatn tli , an►tc��a bei:v. and SW 121st ANtOnuea 0U'1 92'00®6 �.� 111TON ,k. CL D ,� YSI APtoLICADIR APPEO1T&J STANDA tD3 rom�unit ; 8eve3orsnt Code. e Chapter 18.52 contains standards for the R -7 tone. h ®ingaLa- farmily detached residential unit ,La a p6Wmitted. use in the none. Detached, single - family residential lots in the zone must comply with the following dimensional rerairemonts: 4 FINAL ORD= Minimum it site Average minimum 16t width Front setback Garage setback Interior lot side setback Conner yard setback Rear setback Maximum building height 5 000 square feet 5( feet 15 feet 20 . est 5a feet 10 feet '15 feet 35 Feet Chapter 18.80 provides a process for providing a means for creating planned environments through the application of fleacihle developMevlt standards. The purpoee statement notes that it is the intent of this section to preserve to the greatest eartent possible existing landscape features and throUgira the Into of bite planniy'ag procedures that relate the ' type emit design of a development to the Site. m 'h Planned Develoixtent process is pee fitted only through the application of the Planned Devaelopanen , Overlay tonne to (!!S parcel through a `one change applArcat on If the a oliCatiox involves pp . . 4 for the tone change and tt�e sau�aoi4.r�.s�ioin� of /and; th�x �� 1ica��ie�n thJ preliminary plat a;v proval s' ny be heard concurrently. Approval of the Planned Dovel vmant Overlay tone doed not expire if an approved conceptual clan its not acted upon. Approval of the Planned Develop1nent Site development plan in *mild for eighteen anonthe and may bs extended for an additional, twelve ns ontha. The minimum lot Site lot depth, and lot width standardsa of the undoelying one shall not apply to a planned development a+erep as relattid to the density computation= Emildlin height requirementit of the underlying zone shall not apply cutcejpt within 100 feet an lsetablished Area. Trout Yatds aide yard; and rear yard setback of the underlying son` ,eh . l.l. net apply enxc pt on the perimeter di the site. C•• itSges Oust s i0 i.antaian a ` t anty foot setback from public rights ®cif - snags A i applicant., may request rr oect it . setbacks to be appli',d to the development of the Planning Co oiesion may eastahliah special setbacks pods section 18.80 a 120 identifies approval criteria for a plarane I development Pit o plane Of Particular note with regard to the cnrr snt request is S ion 18.80.120. A. 3. a g i) which state that ". . strltets, buildings, and Caner site elements 81M11. be des ignned' and located to preserve the 2cieting trees, topography, and natural drainage to she greatest ea ent possible." 800 92 -0008 .: ANT0N PAIR Noe II AGE • Chapter 18.88 &!ontalize solalr niCceew standards for new residential e aent A lot masts the baiatc solar accee ee let standard a rdoif it has a north -south dimension of ,9) feet or more and lot line that La esrtLented iiht thin 30 degret% ' of a true east -west axis. z subdivision A cziraplies with the basic tequire nt if $01 or more of the newly Created iota �e� e�c. this s tandard.' a. � SectiOn 1$•88 41040.3 (Adjuatiattnte to Design Standards) tat') that the arOva1 authority may reduce the scent = aia i of lots that must comply with SectiOn 18.88.040.0 (Design standards) to the minim extent necessary if it finds tin) applicant hats shorn that exieting alto conditions affect the deevelop Ment opportunities of the sites such that requiring full ooasrpliaanco with the solar design standards, wou7,d reduce den ityr; significantly increase development goat, or E Uminaate aamenttiea. Conditions to be dena►idered include, slop:), significant icant natural features, shadeh from acf�tin g treessi, and ,existing road or right- ofd4way patterns. • Chapter 1 . contains atandarde for dung ty. Why, num1 er of dwelling uLr3.ta permitted i44 based on the net development area, g areas and land dedicated for public roada excluding esa$�eaitide land � rh or parks, or for privatee roadways. To dletermine the nuitsber of lots, divide the net development aroa ht the Minimum parcel ai,zo pera ii t ed by the zoning- district. • Chapter _ 1e . 102 contains an.. e ® tx n. dards foss ear 'vision at roadway/driveway/walkway i irer i vi.sual ra obstructions are permitted between 3 and 8 feet ove rad within specified vieirn, clearance tr,tangle, depending the type and s ize of ace '8 sway. ▪ Chaapte r 18.150 requiretn a permit and edi aine stand ds for rival, h* .. am far tout Of � dry 9p 6 .{ �y /y �+p /� more ry+ • WA t�e�e® Abw��i0a� � trunk V �Ari•OM�hie�� d� LICaeYi rei in feet 'shave the ground on undeveloped land, A it tree retnoval must &Atoll with the following criteria: . �t . ` a. the trei�� are. di�see�aeel3edo pre ®asst a da>ragier, to l�r ®peaMtyD ors interfere with utility e�e�l.ce dk trar`1�£ic eta f, yf h. the treest have to be removed tai dettatrt .et proposed ....p . , ..lspli:eeh� '"s im x ®vs3xie?�nteer; ®r td ot?hier�,ric�e �til�c� 'the, a� ro tt ' in a reasonable Manners a. The trees are net needed to prevent erosDiono .n+eta i.g .tyr or &din** pr ohlerne The trees are nert Eeeded to protect as : by 4reeh a i. c indereeks or as a dose r - aable balance k„atiaaen. shade aged. 'iSl space a. e a The � eattetiec chaaraadore in the aadver eeijp a± t'ec aed " ►y th0 tree i retnovai egad yl �D SUB 4240006. AtitOtt.7,;444)gb., aF. New vegetation l ' planted by the applicant„ if any, ; will replace the aesthetic vale + of tr .us to bs cut. Chapter '1.160 contains standarde fore adiVieion of parcels Lute 4 or more lots To be ~: a p �.rve3, a preliminary plat aa�t, comply with the following ' criteria • . The proposal Welt Comply with the C 4p?ehensi ve Plan and the applicable zoning. o�c��ance and �ther applicable, ordinances and regulaticpgs . The proposed plat name must not ` be deplicaativei a tint otherwise satisfy the+ pro ialonta of ORS Chapter 92; • The streets and roads lital Eft bit laid cuaa t so as to conform to the plate of, S bdatvieione and maps of pa.rt3 Micna ciSi' svxbdAvie one aiready approved for adjooining property as to width, ii, genera: direction and ini all other t'espects unless the city deter ininoa it is in the pUbl:Lc intek' st modify the street or road pattern . Variances to Code developtei t. standards may be approveil through the subdivision review proceas upon evAtiafaacticn of the following variance criteria: s. t On i 1 p affecting the property which gtre unuau l and peculiar affecting p � y to the land as compared to other' lands similarly situated; 2 The variance is necessary for the {proper design or function of the subdivision; 3. The granting the variance will not dl be ,Y tal etr' i e to the public healthe s afety y and welfare on injurious to the rights of other owi ere of props y and Tho variance is necessary for the Preservation and . enjoyment of a substantial property right b cacse of an extraordinary *t xd ;,bip which O id result from strict complis ace with the regulations of this title. chapter 16.16 containe ®tandard® for titres end utiltties 4 8ectiOn 1.164.030(, 0 reititlieSS etreeta within and aaOloining ' prj iilp caved barteex orb the a deve�,o e�a� to �,e ded�.caatc�! a�nr� r cla at Lf ioation Of the tstreet , r1 .. aaal aDtraet tc n i/6 b �+act:ian► 16.164.0301.44 �gu�.res art iit .. aiairtiM M Elio, , ig ., 1/ td n between c��rhi�i �c� efdewaa�;kkiha� . a � �r�t pae�►e�► secti�a c seo1ion `i0 d 164. t'a'i ( We i �:4e loca 7l` ,street 0s�asa46 of 2 *, cr iea8. F1fhx's oRDER ti us 0008 `ANTOR PAFtlt tads I pna Section 1,8.164.060 prohibits lotl depth frog being r»ore than 21 times the lot width, requires at teast 25 ,feat of lot; f rontuge , on a street other than an aii,ey, and diaoon r agaa the creation of through lots. e. Section 18.164.070 reguirasa Si ewa:MS adjoining at 1etgi1 residential streets. f . Section 18.10.,0p0 requires sanitary sewer earvide. g� Section 16.164.100 requires adequate provietone .,foes: storsi on Of eaaeiT tss3 for ®tom drainage Water runoff se and ddi�ati �acitiens. licab; Vim, c7 g1 sgit .n 3ye, Pi is .a . . Polio 2.1.1 prtvidee the City will acaure that citizena will be prdvided an oPportunity to participate all phae+se of the planning anning and development review proces:4e. • Policy 3.5.4 calla for an interconnected ►deatt tan /bike pathway system thresiaghos,:t the City, • Policy 4.2.3, 'provides that all dlevelOpmen ; within the Tigard urban ._ planning ataa hall Comply wlth applic4tble federai, atate and regional water quality eta idarde. 4. Policy 7.1.2 prowidee the city 11 rer x e to a condition of clOvelop1Uent approval that public eewanan tor m i n'drainage will, be provided an6 designed to City atn d rdS apd e ® placed underground. g. poi ley '1,3r 1 provides the City will coordi! ate Water. ear'LCeo With water districts . . . � v . . to tin 6 .t - e, etee. .,��,.. a� a ®ws�.. raw dev�l+o r�nb o Pbe c¢snss�s�► • Ps�lic 7 4 4 re iree all approved sanitary y y 7 0 Policy 8:1.1 ptovidea t . h a City 114141 11 plan to;" ® ard eta Ci At street and roadway eys t o�. that mees . du rent nd � is and antidipated future grcn; h an dev dap i ent Cs th1icy 8.1.3 preVidea the City will require As a eirecoaditi.c+f of approval that: a. Development abut a dedicated tirtreat or have other :lad ecpalattit acceae1 • street right ,-ofai6wa'5 ,hail be dedicated where the etr'es 1av a1bnt af'1ar`d in r qje th; the d elo er aha 1. � cr i.t net cj� can o ' rbe and a del elk to. pity a ;and asrds , . _ d e t ® M ▪ The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, =Whey and sidewalks to the extent of the development's cts; • Street improvements shell be made 8nd street signs or signals shall be provided when the development nt ie found to create or intensify . a traffic heaved. IV. P 5 & A ENCY COMMENTS The city of - Tigard Engineering Department has provided the following comments regarding the proposed titre: ►t set erns Previously, during City Councel discuesicets of ISW North Dakota Street teaffic issues, reeidenta of the Anton Park No. l area have asked if the second phase of Anton Perk could be re- designed to provide a direct connection to 1215t eAvenue. The thought was that connection might allow the closing of North Dakota Street to t heou g h t eaf f is After further investigation, we do not recommend a direct connection to 121st for the following reaea. ns: - We cannot find a way to re-design the second phase without lots that fees directly onto the new street. Any options that wa can find would require the removal of eon of she existing homes. in the f iaF et phase or would requite a substantial reduction ie the number of ?`,Ots in the second phase. The These options seem impracticable. - If the new street cannot be designed Without direct access £reM ad 1,, Dining lots, then the n .w street will be no mote :atiefactory as a cull ct er street than is the existing forth Dakota Street. We could merely be shifting .traffic poble as froe one etroet to another. CeeStruoting a floi intersection on 121st Avenue would create some potential traffic safety eoricernA on 121st (a collect tier street) s Pile to the loc,� t iota of sw major Maneanita count and ea ,eetin da►ivewa a along tR of l.l.at en extmnie 9 y lean the eaa�t: aide . ion of Antoci Drive to 121st UOUld net De lie me" t the intera3Ctioe spacing leeqeiteMonte tot a aiilajot CO collector streets t; eil For these reasons, we rZdommend, that the ba sic t root slignati,at alt ate' roved in 1984 be retained, as pro ° be he a lica Dt. wo 111 ee Q� � ,�,� p po�ad 2. The city Hof t`ig�±rd Building Division has coca entet that private eteeM 0�1. ai,,, 9 and �+ F and � atante ehoiald be required for lot® 9'1,414. . l''he city of tigare P abllic Works D VAtitrno it, TealSti Ir ilea *ieee acrd T eat &ze Distric , g . . . . ct Ti � aid Water Di.stricto ad Vitt, iistrthst ttaiteira3 dab; and the pietroDolitith Atinttit Cotoinithidiit144.0 iksititiLittion haave rolviowed , the pieppadal and have of fared he dots of 66 act ,Drib ii tho Ap licaiht t �z `4 aR sub 02. -0 008 a era PARK Kb II VAdk a should contact these utility providers regarding their res uirt %slenta ar.d €ess for utility installation. . EALBATXCN OF REQUIS8T 22M2110.032- w .t , CoMn m D ,,,,Ut lMe it . 1. The prppbsed sa$bdivision /planned development complies with t ndeo standards of the it-'7 zoning district because the lots err d to be used for single family deteChed dwelling units. IledaUbe the with Development overlsly abne, the lots site �.�► �c�►ed va3.t.:e the Plannredl �evelo �s1At need not individually be c©nisi tent With the minin um let Otte and Setback retpirer nts of the underlying none. The preliminary plat utilizes the lot size averaging allowance of the Planned Development section of the Code resulting in eavtleal lots that are smaller than the R -7 monees .t,,000 square foot an `,anlaneknn lot size. However, the preliminary plat, 'atte ilptn , to keep the proposed lot sizes and other lot dimensions relatively consistent with the u :nderlyizng tone e s standards at d with the dimonsiens of 7,0ts in neighboring deaueldpmenta 2 . The proposed saver Ment a nh ®ie 1® cor<nsaiste>nt With the approval standards fora plaAn+ d delelopmenat (CO dia hectic 18.8b.12 i.A(1) and (210 ao demonetrated kit thra propo®ead findings im this section relative to then subdivision a pp ravall criteria sand the proposed finding& presented for the Veriout Code Chapters that staff has found applicable to the request. The Cosanaisaion finds thst the requirements Of the fOl1owin 4 Code Chapters *re ect d3acetIV a .. licaIle to the carrT'21t rOview although butch's i prodo'eisdeiztsa oz the subject Ste will need to confo th with the regUiremeft8 of these Chapters: Chapter 18.144, A;ccea8ox=y StenctUrcat Chaptenr yard Area Rec ireMentn i chapter 18.98, Bui ldisag 18.96, Additional . Height Lisni . �tione Nr 8ptions, chstter 11.100, iaanndseaj ifg and hdreening, Chapter 18.106, Parking; And i'Mhapter 18.114, Signs. r -3� Staff is Charged with reviewing the ..oinfc naxece cif i utnire improvements wit114 theSe Standards th Oug ?`,,. thee buildiTi4 periit and sign permit review prodessee Aa we11. through ce t.4nuing 40de enforcement actions. other lakinecd dsvee o . nt review a� " tdval oriteriae , li.' p. � listed under Code Heat:logo 18.80.120.A(3t 40 not direectl ► apply to this pro Oe l Since theses criteria ,reelo,te to `ault pie Use p1a: ne deve10 ara'ati 4 multi-faintly or nseii��re�iic�ilential develeitt nte, planned de'velonte that include, public 04 private apes 'paC a' sir rebrea `'ion• facilities, Or sites that involve dcivela#0entftlsttatiata . uch nett steep salopee or floodplaine. 3. PrOpottbd Iota 4841 and 110112 anr4 dittilidOd from the endCazetti calculation aS :.,t�8re 2�f percent e+c� 0itel that �it o standse�' �s�oder,,� within the eolar acce®n fay d mom' design tecti.bn 18.83.04060) a applicant recidects that the Con7Ltib adjust proposed lots f 3, 64, and 313 ¢ii i; o the' solar,�eoces�de • nt dtroelopimon : oa out tion� due tip, the a cant -�r'; i sti tALO Wi1'aAlt oRDB 4J8 e2 000b - ANTQN OA AK • i3 a l;i these lots being pre -,d tere inea by the ali9nmedt of ft1l ' eoWtbsesi ,!tub of SW Anton Drive. Coder Section 16.88. ®4'O. k.1. a 0014 and € ivy Pe quit the approva1 authority to reduce the ksietVAMt.le Of logo that must comply with the to1ar aocese for nots n 1 7a= a►'tandattd if existing rightbof -way►s or toad, patter.Ne pretreat, t leta rom being oriented for The r a 7�atll io Solar acao ®e. � � Coaaie�sissioe concurs that these lots andcuid b ad jaaeted Out of the a%� AIX other proposed lots meet the barids solat arcosoa aseitilm standards because these lots W v6 a froii , lot line that is Within 30 degreee tf true north - *,tu ire and a ran :whim north- asoutt lisension of 9)o feet. Therefore, the required 0O p rt:ent of prOpaasd iota that have not bean adivated out of the calculation for c1uaa meet tlb +o book abler design standard Of Cda Chaipter 16.88. • The proposed aubdivieion com lies with. the defeity standards t f p P Chapter 18492 becarase the approximately 268#590 as care foot net developable opportunity ' Site (after gtione for right -of -wa dedication yields an for slightly more than fifty -two dwening unite under the R-1 ronin 9l deai„gnattcan. Fifty -tut. tingle family residential lots are proposed. ▪ Adequate clear vision would appear to exist at all proposed intersections and street corners ceh®ietent with the .standards of Cha p ter 18.102 ®ine® no ei g na aae ro see a the entrance* to phase two and because required building setbacks will keep buildings out of required vision clearance area':1a • Chapter 18.150 tequirea that the number Of trees over s ,* i Mhos in diameter that are removed during the Courare of conetrviction b minimitede tree removal € an be approved if removal heoeaaary to reaeonabl Y allow fmr development of a site or there are anfety or tree health reftsons for allowing the rcmotal. it La reasonable to remove ill' or most of the filbert tt000 on this Site beC41906 these trees would not b and . �., maintained ass an ore:h aft ®re aubdividion and fi i1ure to ternage these trews cams ran it in these trreoe har r flea or bt insocto that may threaten if . ltoert orchards LA the general area. However, care shot id be awn in the develt aaaent of detaffied 0r d1ng< i:4d utility piano+ for thin aubdivieion and is Selecting hie designs for the lots to maintain as many of the other erti at/No trees on the site. It a arrs that Wilt if not all of the a ,iati ny ;f,.reee than would be iocata ,in the baCkyarde of lata 11-45 can be ;,etoined Wi "thout interfering with ther etelb abi]3iy of the e 1�t. Re ta:L ing thee trees should he a benefit for fater reeiden n of the` e iota aa wexl as fez. reside grab .. , g 44evelopatente to the nortl�e sn riei �.� , oriia ditiona the site o e dove leper 1, hodid Dondidkc whether the fruit o_ Deed title f 9 ?i caaax rot d, add her�t�aorrn�e trees olta r arbned tics tire+ reracavaal or ai.te graeg4 ahcoula be 61 6 d to s riper .a P1.. �� u � a .. atni; ineg Tii i.eiora review and appro 'ai of a to r va l p� milt . The apps. leant dItculd be bo to40.4.,04 tc prig ids thy► ea :surest of aan erboriat itateidang the tree redoval grading lane d ort of p - .bisg protedtive ittsededtwo far a16t14 trete td e eaaiPlo eai ddritg c ®rdatruotion on the . , !t1 • • tO LU The p ;vpoeed subdivision Le cent lists t with the testvi reams t t Chapter 18.160 because: a The proposed subdilrision complies with the Coseprehensive Plan a:iap' a Mediur Density Reildential designation's dimity opportunity for the site ee well es with the ,applicable plan policieAb thssa! regulations Of the) -9 ssone, and other `. applicable reg lltationL ; . The proposed name of tho aubdierielon, itnton„Paierk No. 2, is Act duplicative Of any oth c plat recorded in .Washington cou>t,t± other than the adjoining first. phalli', SW Anton Drive will provide for adequet41 and safe acce3u to the tots in the proposed aubdivLslon. This street will be required to be improved to local, otreet standards. e The Commission io well aware of the traffic concerns of the residents of Anton Park No. I slibdivioion relative to traffic on 8W North Dakota Street. In previous discussions s with thcs city Council, residents have suggested that through street between SW North Dakcte a.. ',reet and SW 12let Avenue be developed through Phase II of the Anton lark subdivision in order that t North Dakota Street be closed to through traffic. This would t`esd►ult in a great reduction in traffic in Anton n Park Zito. X but would only Shift' the traffic through neigahborhOo probla r to Anton Park No. II. Awhile t Park may be benefidial to the existing re #dents of hton k No X, it would have no net benefit to the public. In additionp a a as the Engineering .: Depaii tment s 9 �' comments note, requiring an east-West C011eotor street in phane I2 would 1) reduce the allowable number of lots in ,. , g, Y, Phase I1 due to �.r =cr'saa.sg��d right demands; and 2) this collector street wot�1d be, diffict*tt to connect to Sim orth Dts otas street on tho west becaues oa.,ietifq dr euinge on lot a 29 and 30 of Ant0n _Peck Y diaeiy b. too c3,oee to a pavement for the west ... . - . � °� ; . ° �- wa;say, axtt�, neceeea ry widening of the existing r ht o these lots. aar>ta a stub of S� Anton Drfve b�rtweeh In addition, 00 101 Section 1O.1644030 ( i setato that *i ► no Cabe shall the Staggering , ,itrweits am ing Hilt* in#era ect ono pt col�icturt a nd rtetie ie he dtiigne d teach that Ja g e of leSe than 300 feet on etreeta rare create d, a® easured fttei,the ceeterlltseea Of. isautiia etr tst;r An e etat..Weat s rep ktou �h 3404 kb, II ieaua4 Able to cdnaect with SW 2let A aeu,tt net he �►�t�ona�aenc0 . with thin tref f c ioaate y reload Ptttadatd a le ire then street . to i directly in line With std Nanranita IL.Onitt 64 the oaat ` sapid #, Of SO 121at q If thin, atra et Walt dirhetlt.t. .n d . t> pw. with i s Natanz vita Cont o traff ion >woutd bay raquirsd to° i a .ck jog port award within 1 ttoaa Parkk !oa xt, whtah silly crea►to ' afnothe, hati!;doud t'raf Lo ei�isad+ tie ad la r op ` aasu��i asair intereo �c1`w iOn 'w ®uld sA1a1SA ttre 0tLtrJr tide' 0,..b.00 ttiple is ontege lobes a t igjbly u�ad��eiraa s sa tat> t a . FINAL oND Ft sNS 92-0008 ml.V4tWr PANE N0 .il Gg, w • The fission held a public ' hearing oaf July, ' 2C iti92 to constider th3,>A application. At. that' : t4 ing, '' neia ,hbo to of the ,presp t itre' devrelOt et • site t t►eted,' that the iaeien continue '; the bearing bo allO' the neiglabors, to preeen a traf f i.o di' version p l,a i fov. the ',neighborhood th at' t) a neighbare " beli eared might b elt, pertin nt t ' p l he,2 C 9aio �o the review of ..he r�aaabd� vision . r aal. •'� , g. yp . h,a Q lesion granted the re eat for ha� ' csvnztinu aence ho ing, on this application' was reopened oi'k Auguat 31 1992 for reviews of the traffic - diversion` plan and additional , public te,atimaony. The peimaiaeaipzt. also reviewed the Staff °Ea August 1.t, 1992 MIMoranclum responding to the neighbors'. diverktion plan involving modifications to the existing intert pi cn of SW tizi,t7.01 Dakota, Street arid SW Springwood Drive, The August 3, 1992 staff Memo is h' reby incorporated by referenda as additiOnall, Planning Commission findings. The Commission finds that the neigth ;ors' prc►posed intereeetion revision would a riot;: change the preliminary plat for the proposed Ai` tcn Perk #2 and since the proposed intersection modification ,La intended to deal with an existing traffic ai. ua�ation Which is located off of the subiect y proposed Modification is not som thin it the t eshow �^ be intersection the rta reegonditi:lity of the pr ice p to w xoe cove developer of an'�.t�tn pa�� ;�2 to conaa��-itct or. finance While the CemxaisSI4da u Aderstandaa the Anton Park 1 ret4idc;et ®. traffic concerns, the go ami ssion has .not. balm shown boir theee concerns are directly related t� twee proposed d©velcpe rent of Astern Park I74. Th �a proposed asubd vtaloa i s consistent with the requfkreiktiente of Chapter, 18.164, or can be modified to 'be consistent, With these: a er �.� �.� requirements, because: a SW Anton Drive i VtiOne aed t rr have a fifty foot wider of .-way, b„ ftully improved ti i h sidewalks on k:)th bidet/ of the rrtreet, and have a minimal grade theretbkeo the spp1ic ' at • ae preliminarein plan► f ter developing this eti tent S consistent With Cede atend, ?1_:as for', local Street Width, Street grade, and iunprovS w : -' ,era da The ►0 121C ., Avenue fronts gab of the Site is already Improved Ao atajbli collector Street iirprovement Standards. c r The proposed bats are ce nanietsnt With Code Otatidtirdiii, fear miniachni Street fruitage and ether let din eneioi al 'Standards inncluding s'ani.miui let dept -ito -wi cith retie, except i aaa lot ;A :hid .p°..,e, ; ,-_. Mess of b3 ��yniepl� ..__yy.�d��y „�,�r�` ®a lot cue th� tai wri.cit�n ra�t3�ca �.tn e :he 2, 5 to l its adarC s i a + ode So ; Lora Z a U 6! a i” .1. t b) et,Ateiti thaws. lot dept ' as nc�t earoSed 24,5 times t ave;'a0e Width of V.60 let." Prca "" sed let 6a3 it pO' ` ;a:i,ri halite aniin A,vrrag3pti o£ 1" 'teat to a width of gO feet or' a- detAth to siidfn ratio f 27 ter 1. ode sectiOOn .r4. l6b. hats abut i ri, ee heea '406 da` 7A s onb S • 9' :914006 •0400 N p i• �u��•��}C:Y.o.r „ .�... a?Ca� .•Hari: authority' to grant variances to Code standards throo0h r snbdivi ei on review prooess. Sectioan 1 #.1 *i . X O the ®parable variance) aappn~rval criteria. The premised lot depth , to width ratio v "i, :races i taated by the 6 xi ting 148 f 00, ,, dlstanole bittWaon t so tthc.?s stub of SW Anton Drive intereectiniC tax lot l'A and a' W 121st Avenue. Thies eituatio 4 where misting atrset locations necessitate tho requested variance s ar, re ative ..y unusual .ci cuetancee peonliar to thi .. site as oomyared to other parcels that are hiti.1aar&y zoned. 5 to l ratio while continuing would in order to create a lot, is this area that Consistent with the 2.5 g SW ton rive * orthw ,,rds the lot would need to be at loAst 55 feet wide and appro vianately 7,500 square feet siva. Due to the configuration of tax lot 100, t 1 t ,w Ould probably have to Me eliminated In the blot 63 to lot 71 tier in order to aao®mOodate tt.. lot of this size and dimension .1. This \would cause an nndwa hardship to the property's owner and/or prospective developer. Further, ..- it is unclear how + the currently proposed lot dimensions miqfit negatively Y n. lt the buiidabilit of lot 63 or negatively affect ally public purposes. The requested varianca is th.:refor ri necessary for the prop+;r dAolgn of this subdivision aixnc exranding the Vidth of 10 ') in order to meat this depth tt) width ratio standard suoul 1 nec seitate the probable lose of a lot With no rea &u; improvement nennt of the builda ri .ity of lot 63 or the remainder of the proposed s bdi vi si oa. The granting of the regt1eeted variance would not be detrimental to public safety, and welfare or to the tights is of others. No concerns with the injuriou =, .. requested variance' were raised by neighbors ' or utility providers during thci public review procees qn this application. The Coretieeien cannot foresee r; impacts p y public variance is upon other pro �Irt owners or the olio i.f the t�a.� granted. or the above rea sons, the Co aission la041 that ,ra 1. ing the requested variance to thfli l lot dept • to ' width ratleo s -andard for proposed lot 63 i.e justiff 4 and is within the best interests of the public Th CommisSiOn 'fhb "fore approver the variance request. • The final plat will need to inelud a non - ca ees reserVe strip ao,u0sm 2rom Iota 63 lexo 71 to OW 121st • Thy applicant's preliminarY plane for devil! ie 1.aq e+anitary and storm Eewere as well so Pablit0 wate ' li ges will provide for adeqUate nice ® ar k Public facilities, st proposed public 1�c fa ��ides mill kOr adequate Epa ott to eCribice the PruPcse d C11l0/,„" " it o ®ai 'pnbibo facLliCi a will be regsi.red to be designed 0o40iet at with FINAL OER SUB 92-0006 PARIt NO. i I Il tiaJ JC chapter 18.164 and City of Tigard D .'.sign Standard Manual speoif lest . faMBIWOOLMItb-MERSOMMUIR2INLJDakaat 1. The taubdi rieio is - istent with Policy 2.1.1 because notice of th application fly 20, 1992 public hearing on thi i,tem was provided ded to the neighborhood pl anning ,. or anization and t' owners of property in the vicinity of the site. the site has been posted or development seed with a sign noting that a land use applicatiOn on this site was pending. The COMAlleelOe held a public hearing rxn July 20, 1992 to consider this application. At that hearing, eeighbors of the - proape Live development sits, reguea ted that the leommiesion continue the public hearing to allow the neighbors to preoe nt a traffic diversion plan for the neighborhood that the neighbors believed might be pertinent to the review of the subdivision proposal. The omission granted the request for the continuance. The Commission hearrb j on this appli catik e wrao reopened d on Aliquot 17, 1992 for review of the traffic diversion plan and edditional public testimony. Therefore, oubatantial opp:1r runity has been provided for public input into the revive/ of this development proposal, as le required b ► Plan Po Rcy 2.1.1. 2. an the pre-application conference for this Proposal, ,staff recommended that a+ minimum 8-foot wide pedestriannoicycle pathway be provided britwaecn Antibr Drive and proposed ub��timprovements. r�v�.Th�a as part of the ubdivi inn s props p applicant has proposed that a 1 0 foot wide pedestrian t cement be provided between proposed lots 70 end 71 the conk. -:Sion findh that a need exists for the path because o th substantial additional distance l in excess of 1,100 additu',onai feet, bet /eve the ends of the proposed p thway at Anton Drive and SW 121st Avenue) that pedestrians or bicycliots would need to travel to get to the ea.. point if a , pathway is not provided. While there er ;,•. ti, ignificant tr aff ei safety reason's for net requirieg a direc t etreet hn from this proposed developuent to W 121ot Avenue, the same reasons ado not exist for not providing walkway connection. The prapo ed development is relativa'Jlycloie to sievairal a►tt rac ioc'Ie that could be convenient' Pe"' ® r bi,+cio traffic if a pathway is previded Away ^� Center, Trinity tavgelia 1 church and bus serv►3.r, • ; 1 21st Avenue and Seholle Vet 0/and). The ComMiseion finds Lt ie clearly in the public m s intoneet i promote convenient ti" eckistriar and sicyal circulation throe, ;o, the proitiaionn of a path ins this at •a as a nary of �®dcLh g re ioular traffic. The Co fission 'applauds th y'. applicant c s A11ingness to Provide for this connection. In ord, a r' to comply with .Policy 4.;h 1, cot ditions of approval ate a h a control plan en ing c an a with rosi control standard nor the alatin Rider basin y, s paz t Of the grading permit ap iioation and INAL OADER - SUB 92 0008 «= tasrrzt Pmt NO. l Ptias 14 ��q b:• .rc wuwaavnrY,®.r.w to pay a fee in lieu of constructing on-site a facility. The City's Engineering Department ��vB�Y that the Sfti d veloper be respired to pay a foe in lieu of the conetruct3an of an on -eite water quality facility. The site is considered unsuitable for development of an ors -site facility because of its relatively smell sire and location in the midst of a largely developed residential area. Payment of a fee in ` lieu o2 construction of a facility is author izod by the Oregon Environmental uuality Commi = lion and USA regulations ' in cameo where it is usideairable or impractical to construct a facility. • Thi h subdivisLon proposal complies with Policy 7.7.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 bec = use the applicant will extend public sanitary and storm seat,. re and public water service throughout this subdivision d will provide for underground installation of phone, electricity, and cable television lin =s. • The !subdivision proposal complies with Policy 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 b .•cause the proposed improvements to the streets within and adjdacsexat to the subdivision will be consistent with City Of Tigard standards for leacal streets as described above. VI' n; CONCLUSION AND DECISION The Planning commission concludes : that t` t proposed subdivision, with modif illations, will promote the general welf re of the City and will not be significantl y detrimental nor in j urisaa to surrounding lan d uses, p rovided that development that occurs after this decision complies with app licable local state and federal laws. g concluS�ons contained herein, and In ream iti+�n of the ffnzdin s and g .Re affected encies and public incorporating tl�® staff report and other reports of of fey: testimony :: nd exhibits received ifl this matter, the ,bla.nning Commission approves Subdivision SUB 92-0008, Planned Development Review PIM 02-0002, and Subdivision Park subdivision subject to the V'ari . trace VAR 02-0014 for the proposed ' Anton Pas��c No. 2 drub conditions which follow. TEE APPLICANT SHALL Ca P` "I WIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO RECORDING Or THE S'INAL SUBDIVISION ri,AT WITH W I!!NCTOb1 C0 to 1. The final pl .t shall be lis l.ted to the creation Of fifty -two later l "1 All Iota Shall be gully dimensioned on the plat. The final pl b shall comply with Oregon Rericsed Statutes, Chap toy 92 yf Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18,1601 and sh ic on County standards; b. The plat shall provide for the dedication of all necessary sight- of-way for the proposed pa. bblic street within thOt ou1 s1,vii ion; and c. The fin 1 plat shall inqludit all standard public • - wide pa th ,asy� ealsem nt, and attnri easements, a �init��n 1 ' _ easements as deter drainage 10 foot in .the aconditio�ae which fol:l,�rws FINAL ONDsIt - Sun 92- 0008 - ANTON PJ N00, II SAG • Thra final plat shall establish a one-foot; 11100..E,cCGs along SW 121st Avenue for lots 63-71. the applicant shall ubmit plans, obtain City approves' Fuld provide) financial assu rance for the construction of the follo ng p zblic improvement es t 3.. 'J.1, pwikblic streets within the eubd Fvis ;Lon as specified in the following conditions; reserve strip ii. storm drainage system. Those i.mp onto shad be desige and constructed in ac era ' nce with than remirements of the Cites Ty„ 1,� de rcyAgeerit e shall be completed and accepted by thss O, ;gthim the time frame s , ecified free the public assurance contra UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL DE SATISf IED AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS sEALL, BE COMPLETED PLETED OR COMPLETION SHALL DE FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO THE R1 DING THE PLAT. (Staff contact for all recommended conditions is Chris Davies of the Engineering Department, 639- 4':71, unless. otherwise noted) . 2. A minimum 8-foot wide asphaltic concrete or concrete ps3dotstrl.aabicycle pathway shall be constructed between SW Anton Drive and SW 121st Avenue within a minima 10 foot total width public pedestrian /bicyclist ease() Thopathway shall be between somewhere t.e nort hern boundary of proposed lot 68 and lot 31 Q Adequate site drainage to the public storm- 'der drainage system obeli be provided for all lots. A private story drain and a drainage easement shall be provided for proposed lots 92 -114, ?imlescli it can be desnonstrated how else dr, ,thage from these lots can drain to a public storm drainage system. Lesaements shall be provided where a private storm drain line crosses other lots. A joint Maintenance agreement shall be recorded with each lot accesaing common private storm drain line. STAFF' CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division. 4: The applicant hall be required to pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewer ge Agency Resolution and Order No 91 -47. N a This is a two part fee Which is paid et different times. Th first portion is paid With the public improvements which a within the portion of the development which ine.re se the per Vi ar public rightbof -way. The second portion is paid at building permit` issuance which is for each ind, .,icual lot. 5. Two (2) sets of cdiet :x iled public improvement pialaS and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for p 'e 1 Iminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) rote of approved drawings and one (1) p p. '"" y , ez final reviO r aid rp i a pr ®fe ®s�ona�. shah. be submitted ftiimateo all rr� ar��y� is itemized coremtructi.on cost o� royal d Engineer, � ' An erosion control plan shall be provided an part of the pni, )1,ic improvement drawings. The plan shall o>nfor to litrobion Control Plan - Technical Guidance Handboelt, Novesrlber 1989. FINS; ORDER - SUB 92 -0008 1 TON PARK No II PAGE 16 v 7. As part of the public imPrOvement plans, the app shall apply for and provide the necessary inforaation to obtaie a applicant Permit" for erosion control A grading plan shall be Brilit.sitted showing the ,.xisting antic proposed contours on each lot, including 'elevations tied to the top of curb elevations as hown on the public improvement plans. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainagew ye without significantly impacting properties downstream. 10. Full width street improvements i!or S6 Anton Drive, including traffic control d .vie s, m ilbo ; c e ster®, concrete sidewal es, driveway aprons, curb ;, asphaltic co'astute pavement, sanitary sewers, storm dreinage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed within the subdivision. 1i. Canetriaction of the proposed public improvements shall not commence until aft =r the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plan , street opening permit or conet; uctio compliance greements has been executed, execution of a developer- engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees. try T The applicant shall make an appointment for a pre-construction meeting with the City of Tigard Sngieeering Department after appro"al of the F p p. " the site. The public fins re�vesnae�nt plans but be Ear �� starting �ira:►FF'k� on t applicant, the applicant a s enginesser and contractor ,shall be required to attend this meeting prior to receiving the approved plans and permits 13. Prior to the bein g recorded with Wa�h in gt on County, the app1ic .nt shell provide a 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment. As an a altern'nativo the pplicant may have the plat recorded after the public improvements) have be = n accepted by the City of Tigard and has posted the appropri to Maintenanc e bond. 14e Any tree removal or rclaaation; on this property must be approved by the Planning Division through /approval of a tree removal permit and approva l of the grading plan. Trees over aai.x inch t l.f�tdiameter shall bee re v►ed only as necesssa to con , tract etc eta, es, and reE idenceis. The Planning 'Division may require that the applicant provide or an arborist to review, the plans for grading aind tree protection. The applicant oh ; ll p • . �,, .d tae �rcG►tect marking and fenncisig theoreetl�inee of those gees in rdert p pr ery t the g tree® and roots "roa the effects of ccnetruction activities The. pp ' s arboL�iot or t.. g May prescribe special applicant's the yla�asni.n Asivi. ®3.ona protect3vs measures for tress to be retained on the site . copy of th►§ tree removal permit And approved grading plan shall be available on aitte dur ing all tree remoV al and grading activities. STAPP CONTPACTI merry Offer., Planning Divileiosra. St BDIt9ISION AFFNoVAL SHALL BB VALID ONLY IF THE FINAL PL IS RECORDED D W tfixia EIGHTEEN MGNTN,P Z ° THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DEC/ q FINAL ORDEFc WO 92 -0006 - ANTON PARK B'ciw XX PAGE i It ie further ordered that the applicant and parties to these proceedi notified of the entry o tile ordero day ca 3,4gust, 1992, by the ;r'lanning Comiseion of the City Milt Pyre, d n Tigard Planning Conuniesion PINAL ORDER SUB 92 6008 ANTON1 PARK Noe IS 1 c MMER J. I .6ER d o ROGER ' MAR DS 4500 tip'`'.KRU E. 'AY LAKE !QS '00 Cam: 97035 CAL wouRY 12356 SW 132ND CT TIGA OR , '37223 JIM MARLS H; XS "- NAGLC ASSOC. INC. 12555, SW HUI BLVD TIGA D OR 97223 DEB dOHNSODI 11100 SW TONY CT TIGARD RO 97223 IA HITHER 11135 SW %OW CT TIGARD OR 97223 LARRY MEYSING 12460 SW /M ON DR TIGARD OR 97223 AGENDA ITEM 5.1 }1ET 1RANDUM CITY OF TIGARD , OREGON TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jerry Offer, Associate Planner DATE: August 3, 1992 SUBJECT: SUB 92- 0008 /PDR 92-0002 (Anton Park #2) On July 20, 1992, after receiving a substantial am unt of testimony the Commission continued the hearing for the proposed Anton Park #2 subda v ai on. Th purpose of the continuance was to allow the n i.ghbors of the subject site to submit a traffic diversion plan for SW North Dakota Street that the neighbors felt was pertinent to the review of the proposed subdivision. The neighbors have submitted the "proposed intersection modification s zetch° for the intersection of SW North Dakota Street and SW Springwood Street north of Anton Park #1. City Engineer Randdy Wooley has reviewed the "proposed intersection modification" and finds that the proposed revision does not seem to be related to the proposed Anton Park #2 subdivision application Mr. Wooley's comments tments and the sketches of the "proposed intersection modification" are attached. The proposed intersection revision would not change the proposed preliminary plat for Anton Park #2. Sinc the "proposed intersection modification" is intended to deal with an existing traffic situation and is off of the subject sit&;;, it is not something that should be the responsibility of the prospective developer of Anton Park #2 to construct finance. Therefore, p 4. #2 .� t or to f staff continues to reco eildd approval of the preliminary plat for Anton Park #2 subject to the conditions contained in the earlier staff report. In School Di trice subsequent s1 tied coentsl July the Anton Park the #2l Beaverton proposal relative to schools a The Beaverton School District has reported d that the capacities of potentially affected sChotls are adequate. The School District's comments are attached. Staff recommends that the Commission make note of the School District's comments in the final order on this application. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Jerry Offer, Assistant Planner FROM: Randy Waoleya City Enginee SUBJECT: Anton Park No 2 (SUB 92-0008) July 30, 1992 Attached is the proposal of the Anton Park neighborhood for diversion of traffic on North Dakota Street. The larger sheet is the formal submittal, prepared by the developer's engineer as a courtesy to the. neighborhood. The smaller, sheet is the neighborhood group's original sketch; it shows their arguments in support of their plan. My comments are as foi l.ews e Proposed _ Subdi:v ision The traffic revision proposed does not seem to be related to the Anton No 2 subdivision curzently before the Planning Commission. It would not in any way change the proposod plat as submitted by the applicant. The traffic problems in Anton No . 1 are existing problems. I could � net expect development of Anton No. 2 to significantly change the existing traffic situation ,:1 Anton No. 1, since the new subdivision will have its access points at north and east, limits of the existing subdivision. If the suggested traffic revision at North Dakota and Spri.ngwood 'ie appropriate, , it should be installed by the City There would be no reason to wait for the development of the Anton No 2 subdivision The cost of the s'uggesteel revision would be small. Therefore, I recommend approval of v the A staff ireport. subdivisior subject to the conditions in the pre Fro osed, T affi.c Revue, ion The City Engineer can consider citizen suggestions for traffic revisions at any time I will accept the neighborhood's suggestion for further review. n Q .. Would eot ex p ect to implement ent th e su gg ested revision at this time for thfollowing reasons . 1. The widening of Scholi.s Ferry Road is expected to be substantially completed in September. The add ed traffic .ar l eS d traf! i:c signal system on �Scholls Ferry 'toad are ex ected to decrease the ti y ~ and i.�nprave p �� ` .,af �.�.0 �ro.�r,ImeS On Nueth Dakota +r„_. n �_�t_� rJ X3.."i �,,.r lkr.`�'?!.t .dK'`1G 'a y"'?' •,w'�:1 �t:..a.'�''._ Street. Previous requests t restrict North Dakota tpaff .c during the constructL.►.n of Scholls ' etry Road were denied by the City touric.il. Therefore, it is appropriate to wait until the effects of the Sthoils Ferry orovements are kno, en before considering any revisions to, North Dakota Street. 2 In 199O, the City retA ned an independent traffic engineer to work with the City and the neighborhood to identify potential solutions to the Anton Park traffic ' concerns, The discussions' with the traffic engineer included' discussions of turn restrictions at North Dakota and rin but Various �r�.ct� � good � �a combinations of turn restrictions were considered but all were rejected ' � The primary con -; €rn was that the rcstxicta.on.s would encourage through traffic y' the Summerlake subdivision, along Springwood. Drive and Su e,'i.ake Drive. Also, ; Summerlake residents would no longer be a�Wl.e, to access Scholls Ferry Road at a signalized intersection. These concerns Still 'exist. After the Scholls Ferry Road project is completed in a few weeks,, take and speed counts op North Dakota Street in Anton Park traffic volume we will again � � Park to see if the Scholls erg improvements decrease North Dakota traffic as expected. If the North Dakota , traffic problems c ontin . , we will again review all options for North Dakota, including the attached su gg est ion from the neighborhood. [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] --,ct 4 1 L 4:) e vi brr• `r 1 m+t * %, .. Sw. l v O ce p uie, 0 d (4 5 ter`. A.L. �"D 1 1 • � ‘ �'. 6t.A. ev e, `4.1'• in. .k 40 + � leS0.004 aLLOW tj0841,100 tioel 04 e-e:•°z,i-i), 4t) IA. 0 ik c's, tOo 14 41, Lee 1A. VII t 6 tip 0 t` ' "4- Ze,tk lA o+ a 4.1..0 % 601.44..k. zke I•t�:'e 4 b %vas, ' 4.) +06340,:t:ifititt.74 • • RE :.UEST FOR .CAMMEN'ra TO 2.7.4.711V. A LAVI -1 FROM: Tigard Planning `Department 14 RECEIVED PANNING JUL3'I 1992 DATE: .dune ne _ 19 1992 --- SUBDIVISION SUB 92 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ..,,'PDR, S�A_niA►CI -0008 V92-04014 SCHUT EDW I:EMEYER (NFC* #7) lr request ' for approval of the following development applications: cations a 1) Subdivision prelin i.nary plat /Planned Development conceptual plan approval to divide a 7.85 acre parcel into 51 lots ranging o allw between an increased last width to depth ratio ofi2.8 2) Variance approval to to 1 on one lot where a ratio of 2.5 to 1 is normally required. APPLICMILE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52p 18.80, 1.8x88, 11P.150, 18.160, and 18.164. LOCATION: 10975 OW 121st Avenue, between SW 121st Avenue and SW North Dakota Street, t, north of Anton Park I. (WCTM 181 3403, tax lot 100) ZONE2 R -7 (PD) (Residential, 7 units /acre, Planned Development) The R -7 zone allows single family det, >had /attached residential ,units, duplexes, ,public support facilities, u� mobile parks, arks ors uses, treatment homes, family day Eeare, home occupations, lions temporary arresidential y residential fuel tanks, and accessory structures among other uses. Attach , =d is the Site Pan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our sta.f, ` a report and rec om mendation 'will be prepared and s;' decision n will be rendered en the proposal in the near future. If you wish application, your comments by �7une 26, 1992. You may use the ace provided below attach asepaua letter to return your commentso .' ploaue phone the staff contact noted below 1.th your _oommente and confirm yogi° t in writ .ng as soon as you are . unable to res�sand by the above cis �,� comments 3:a. ,. possible. if you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Nall Blvd., Vigsr, 1, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: .7eerr r Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEM'S THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no ob jectioas to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person C'b ment inq ►hone Number: 1 -� bkn /Stfl392- h08.8KM e'. ar BEAVERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT CITY/COUNTY RESIDENTIAL IMPACT STATEMENT fntc. Park. No. 2 Name: of Development. or Developer Number ° of Units: Elementary Md y Intermediate Whitford Hight School. Beaverton Single-family Multi-family (I) Ava .i le School Capacity 3:50 (2) September 30 th. I Enrollment (3) Enrollment impact of prior Approved. Developments I (4) En . ollment Impact of this Development (5) Potential, School Enrollment (sum of columns 2 3 , 4) 407 (projected. 9/9 ? 12 16 435 1000 2000 866 32. 7 905 1902 ' 58 4 1964 For explanation of col =mss l , ho. 5 , see code on reverse= side j School(s) available capacity is adequate. (For additional information, see. Schedule A. and Status of Educational Standards and Quality ` Indicators for Core Facility Capacity. School(s) available capacity is inadequate. (For additional information, see Schedule A and Status of Educational Standards and, Quality Indicators for Core Facility Capacity..' The core facilities students. (restrocrosF cafeteria, library, etc.) are inadequate: to support additional • Classroom capa^ity is inadequate to support additional students. • The Beaverton SchzIol District does not believe that it has sufficient annual operating income to educate iaditionaI students, without downgrading the e-1 ati received by existing students. Signed. ve Director Facilities Planning & Cow ruction' This school impact statement is for the above indi ted' - elopment, and is valid for 120 days.. BEAVERTON scighogi DISTRICT CONSIDERATIONA ALTERNATIVES TO VIDE ADEQUATE LEVELS OF srirvICE 1. Amount of bonded indebtedness - Beaverton School District has authorized but unissued bonded indebtedness. The authorized bond measure commits these funds to construction of facilities which will riot provide additional capacity in all areas. In the judgement of the Dvstrict's School Board, an attempt to obtain voter approval to incur additional bonded indebtedness for the foreseeable future would be unsuccessful. 2. Use of double shiftinga extended, schoo eriods or relr°rourid school, The report of the District's Student Housing and Facilities Utilization Task Force to the Superintendent dated January 17, 1991, and the subsequent Superintendent's recommendation approved by the Board on February 25, 1991, proposed further investgation of double or triple shifting, extended school periods, and year-round school. Such options would involve major policy, program, and fiscal chen;, es for the District. The District does not believe that at present the non -bond alternatives are viable responses to the need for additional, echool capacity generated by individual residential development applications. The initiatives of House Bill 3565 (the Katz Bill) .. i year school day and/or year for students, which double eshiftin org eoar round school would make very difficult, if g y notimpossible . Busir1gto underutilized fac' 'tles - The District presently has no , nearby throughout the Dista i °, to serve . or thro the additional enrollment projected by the proposed development. Extensive bueing of students is also contrary to the District's policy of providing neighborhood schools. 4. - Beaverton Schr c el District will open a new Construction of new facilities Beaver elementary school and 24 additional permanent classrooms in September of 1992. It will also open a new middle school and a new high school in September of 1994. These schools will provide permanent new capacity at those levels. This capacity is necessary to serve students projected to be in Beaverton schools by the time those facilities open. In September Of , . • move will .. Le ' . • . ninth the District will e sixth �'ra�d�rs to middle schools and nunth graders to high school. This re,..duce available capacity at high schools schools. By . that time, the District will and increase capacity at elementary have reviewed all attendance boundaries for possible adjustments. The District does not have funds to coy : . facilities ,r ° ` s to serve students d ` ' develordrients . Further the l�to ons imposed by Measure from additional ��, ^ � 5 mean that the Beaverton School District will not have sufficient funds to operate (heat, light, custodiel services, principal, secretary, etc.) additional facilities 5. Portable .�. ros�trs that arte% �cclsssrao n"r°� • adopted a new ble Blass �- �tor� was policy which states ta � .. y in some circuncu t nces be uased for an extended period of time. However, they are not to be u tilized ... extended a peraaanert solution to school ool housing needs: The re is no prospect that any new portables Would be vepl2akced by permanent capacity in the .h has concluded that the foreseeable future.. Accordingly, the hoard ha .. r',a,i is neither purchase and satirtg of additional portable ciassrtio ° �� educationally or fiscally appropriate: 6. In pact fees - in the opinion of the District's legal counsel, the D #itrict does beA:.have statutory authority to Impose impact fees The d ate r m4611%6°11 c Combination of alternatives '1 he Distrnci; does not conea� the above alternatives as providing adequate additional school apacity. • 111 E catienal Standards and Quality Indica for Core Facility Capacity SaftetylSectwity The principal will organize, direct and maintain the safety and security of the school environment for students, staff and parents. 1..1 Core facilities, i.e., hallways, rue is centers, cafeteria, gyms, school office areas adequately accommodate staff, student and parent passage with a minimum of congestion, special scheduling. 1.2 Traffic and parking at pe k periods, i.e., arrival, departure, and programs arc manageable. 1.3 Student use of playgrounds and covered play areas for instruction or recess allows equal access to a variety of athletic fields activities,; 1.4 Playgr'ount ?s can be supervised economically without an excessive drain of staff resources away from instructional activities. 1.5 The deployment of portables allows the principal and staff the ability to employ adequate surveillance and supervision Standards for Educational Capacity Bialima-ftf.AcraUlftleaa 1. Unacceptable 2. Acceptable Status of Acceptance Comments M .. 1" �c. _. o ae The principal and $ �!� are unable �le _ .t. o solve extraordinary by overen•allr ont without invoking assistance for howling, capital outla y, or boundary relief outside of school resources or school.level authority. 2. The principal end staff are able to solve program parameters " " o ffi and use issues within routine paramete�rs� of g planned capital improvements. comment s attention to scheduling, additional regular staffing allocataont� and staffing, materials cr capital investment are explained a the May 19, 1992 Mi c%Jahhienpnet Stdte enta \Lcat'ait $tenet attylnL k'Chrt tional Standards and Quality Indicat fet- Core Facility Capacity The pr cipaZ provides for a healthy and personalized environment. 2.1 Restroom facilities for s.tudents and adults are accessible during passing time, recess, and ltmche 2:2 Access ?9 drinking fountains and sinks for drinking and wry Ong is adequate. 2.3 Cohesive.. 4,0 and personalization of the school corm-at-Laity is maintained, i.e. students know the adults and adults know all of the children. 2.4 Health rooms have suffiaient space to servo studant needs during peak periods. 2.5 Students have adequate space in which to store personal belonging CALK-wow& 0L prvviae o 1egomit peetor+ct0 Standards for Educational Capacity s.1 :Of Acceptance Code WA WA= I. � 7 i e rxnez ale nd staff are e unable to solve extraordinary problems created by overenroll ent without invoking assistance for housing, capital ou`' .y , or boundary � elxef outside o f school resources or school-level authority. 2. are ogram and use issues within routine par ' eters Amiable: The principal and staff are able to solve pr g capital i._. ; additional allocations and planned improvements. ��... re... tar° staffing , . ...: , aned in the comment Seldom xom v ®xnercts Special attention scheduling, a staffing, materials or capital xnvestrrnexxt are explained May 19, 1992 1' auV'ahl' Xmpo :d Siatsriieretik, 'd 't anidtdio altylaetis.Chna rational Standards and for Core Facility Capacity'; The 'principal provides an appropriate environment which respects confidentiality and privacy for spec student services, i.e. speech/language, psychologist, volunteers. tigafi ®f' tc t ce 1, Unacceptable 2. Acceptable Status of Acce . tante Comments 3.1 Voluteers have appropriate space to work with st}ddents and staff. 3.2 Service pro eiders, both within the School District and outside th,2 Dijstrict, have appropriate space to meet with students and/or parents and staff, 3,3 Confidentiality and prihvacy a e provided where needed for consultation and ciinferences Seoc4 l i 64134 S.,11'414 oriier6 StACk etches4111, vali eekaea w» - k i wi4, 5+O a r" ..°CuVr s co'Perence$d TfAnl ��' 6r'eca+ Books) our sc kc &,I ck . E W * !nom/ hckve er oti Spoor es, S at da rds for E icath nil Capacity , n y . y.. � • male to solve extraordinary pro'lil��ns created by oriorenrcllr�rent without invoking a sistan el for housing capital outlay, or boundary relief outside of school resources or school- level authority, . .-ble to solve program and use issuso within routine parameters o2 2. �� ^ 7.'h�, pi�i�rapal �, regular stain a ��oca *,long, and p snied '�• all �,l g� are able attention to scheduling, a+ddrtrotaal capital Arrnproyerxaonts. special after sting, Materials or capital rnvesimcrnt are explained in the iv.rmrnent sectron. May 19, 1992 MeaAhihr bn statement/4 \tawandr.itopiciiiyhutiothil • r, itz Educational Standards and quality Indicators for 40 Core Facility Capacity 4110 Instructional Program. The principal develops' and implements school -level and District programs which maintain both instructional integrity and accessibility in accordance with District regulations and policies. 1. Unacceptable 2. Acceptable 4.1 All students receive a comparable access to instruction regardless of the facility in with the instruction is delivered. 4.2 Teachers, instructional assistants and specialists spend as much of Their time as possible instructing children. 4.3 The staff is utilized effectively in the implementation of all curricular programs. 4.4 Facilities are adequate to support expected outcomes within spec ar , as and re lug s classrooms. 44.5 Equipment and materials are adequate to support expected outcomes within speciality areas and regular classrooms, ooh s: 4.i .11 students in a given class, regardless of number, have the optimum opportunities for learning. 4.7 Speciality areas are utilized for the purpose for which II 1 they were intended. I' 4.8 Teachers move minimally from room to room m during the day so that the instruction programs comparable, i.e., .° "arterials, equipment and technology are near at hand: Status of Acceptance Comments 1 C.) cia ',Ate afe. pre set/0- ' Y exnpe11 1/4,77., sbcpri-ek 44` om. •�r' 414 eaviions 40 1 ' Standards for Educational Capacity ry created by overonrollnient LZa�...�� The principal and �6t�F are tunable � aoly r boundary outside. of s • problems cress by 1: without invoking assistance for housing, capital outlay, ry or shoo resources a school-level authority. lit' : The pri._.. ip `sues within rot ne parameters of • noL`y al and staff' are able to solve program and use issues regular staffing allocations tions and planned capital improvements, Special attention to scheduling additional staffing, mefieraale or ca p ital investment are explained in the c on ent se ction. el Van i ' is a. rnla e- to linclo -e.1 d%A0 op0 rflitr,i %' ar likai- we Ark tooterrvect. i 0,1 evAl'• y- 0 66 „x t. J6 i✓ 1%6" 4v 4 2, r or a►b� . ct '°+4ti cAf rec4V on "# May 19, 1992 mcie P®hNr4poct 5 feiiuis!'�rrE �PairietrdaQwaU`3 +lridic�Chi c rational Standards and Quality Indic for Core 'Facility Capacity Mahitenance and Use of Facilitie6 smi Gro Standard The principal provides for the effective use and maintenance of buildings, grounds or epnnrent• atataLdAtteigang& 1. Unacceptable 2. Acceptable Qual tyal d ca airs 5.1 School facilities are scheduled in a manrner'that maximizes their utilization while providing for regular cleaning and maintenance. 5.2 School grounds are scheduled and maintained in a manner that maximizes their seasonal use while n ainteinitrig their usability during rainy weather. 5.3 Open space (not dedicated elaaarooms or core facilities) is used to facilitate movement, engage students in active learning, and provide for an extension of learning which emerges from the classroom. meatus of Acceptance Amisotottseimmimersvwswor (CortilrIcrits 1 �2 vie at nO V ceo/e opP' SPPd i4nWetier, wt tople lxvet c c4i d •Pkexi bie i l thew ew 6n ArtelitS Irotaii Spa.aes hoof 4 iR+raoi �ta.'�.ii..mnr.>rne.o Standards for Educational ;.rapacity $ l iAgg an C- 2-D gfigi Iona 1. J- T cee table.: The principal and staff are unable to solve extraordinary problems created by overenrollmept without invoking assistance for housing, capital outlay►, or boundary relief outside of school; resources or school -level authority. • m and use is. ui. hrithin a nd , Principal � program I parameters of 2 j :The ranca al and staff are 'le to solve r® �s ftnae ararrn i. • . s._. mp .. ,. :. ' I i • al � ..: .. -. capital l lamed n the comment attention to scheduling, regular staffing allocations and planed i g ad+dntnon staffing, m atkrials or capital investment are explained rent section May 19; 1992 MackPahiVnttictei Stare ivitaiEdSfaiadri* tiat yinitic -Chrt of :� A . 'a► rincipal 1 inittee Chair Da al School !Co NPO COMMENTS o Bill Gross, Secretary for NPO #7, 3019 SW Hampshire, Portland, advised the Caginission that the NPO met and discussed the proposed : orange to Srbol 1 s Ferry Road and were in favor of the changes as proposed by staff. He stated they voted to forward a recomieendation for approval of the !proposed re&si gnats one PUBLIC TESTIMONY There was no one signed up to speak on this item. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o There was brief SCUS�Si (1 d 6 111 with Commissioners indicating Co11sensua in favor of approving the request. Come psi caner Boone moved and Coo mi ssi a ner Barber seconded to forward to City Council a reca nendation for approval of CPA 92 -0004 and ZOA 92-0002, Motion passed by unanimous vote of Commissioners present. 5.2 SUBDIVISION SUB' 92 0008 PLANNED . ®EYELOPMi�NT PDR 92-o0O2 VARIANCE aq VAR 92-0014 SCWVLTZ/EDN'ARDS NIEMEYER A request fora approval of the fol 1 owl ng devel opment appl i cacti ons 1) Subdi Vl si on peel Toni nary p Development conceptual plan approval 7.85 acre 1 at�Pl tinned � a royal to divide a p. ranging tureen 4,700 ad 800osquarthfeet in areal into 51 lots ran in be size; 2) Variance approval to allow an increased p to width ration of 2.8 to 1 on one lot whereas a maximum ratio of 2.5 to 1 it allowed. APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Comilinity Devel opwerrt Code Chapter's 1 4.2.1 2, 1 s8.150, 18.150, and 18.164; �sdy�p�'�b�a 18.52, � 82P anQp�, 18.88x. 18.92, ��s Comprehensive l l icier 2.1. 107. 18.150, 7.2.1, 7.4.4,, 7.6.1 s 8.1.1, and 801.3. LOCATION: 10975 SW 121st Avenue, between SW 121st Avenue and SW North Dakota Street, north of Anton Park 1. (ACTh 1S1 34CB, tax lot 100) ZONE: R -7 (PD) (Residential, 7 units /acre, Planned Deve1 opment overlay zone) The R-7 zone allows si ogi a family detached /attached residential res dent ial units duple xes p u blc_ Supp o rt aci l i i i es, mobile hone parks, residential ta treattent boos, family roily d y care, p a e $ t among other uses. e planned devel op nt overi ay zoneall s flexibility regarding certai n dimensional standards Associate Planner . called, the staff report, noti ng that the Pl tinnier Offer or proposed subdivision sion was called, at this time, Anton Park 2 He described the location mn and explained � to be their yrei ues 4. He of rated out there was a o the ..p p g. c�an� i n�i cabf e �r� a0tori asroval of a�tdfifty' -®�e staff report on page 1 �' �- s ®urmllaw� ze talked p P ed the applicable cod about the p PP t es " l and er requirements. He specified the Comp eats. Plan . poi lcies and Con uni Y Deve . pm _ t ,Code chapters: which are apps cable. He discussed the project ovevview provided by the applicant. • PiANNW O C QVAIS$aOW MNUTES- LV Za, 992 • • Associate Pl a,aner discussed the variance pertaining to the lot depth to width rati e). He advised the plan meets solar access requirements. He discussed the traffic issues. He advised that staff recommended approval subject to the conditions noted In the staff report, noting that page 15, final plat, 1.a. should be. fi fty -two lots," o Commissioner Oarbtr requested that Associate Planner read the section from the Planned DeveloPmant Overlay which explains purpose. A: soc i ante Planner read 18.8O subsection 10. He clarified for Commissioners where the pedestrian pathway would be located, between lot 70 and 71. APPLICANTS PRESENTATION o Jim Harris, with Harris -McMonagl e, 12555 S!:! 4a11 Boulevard, spoke representing s and stated pA g ' ,p® canto He di cussed the traffic issues n the � 1 i "we're willing to work with anyone who has a solution. He advised the amount of traffic which will be coming from this new subdivision would not have a significant impact on Anton Park I. He empha:i zed that his client is wil l i ng to work with the neighborhood. He discussed the lack Of o pe n s p ace, stating the lots were large enough to provide 4ndivislually for this. PUBLIC TESTIMONY PROPONENTS There were none. OPPONENTS o Larry Meysi ng, 12460 SW Anton Drive, Tigard, advised he had one of . the corner lots in Anton Park I facing the street. He requested that speed bumps be added, since the intersection of '121st and North Dakota. has traffic backed up in ` the AM peak period. a Nark Johnson, 11100 SW Tony Court, Tigard, said ` he lives in Anton Park I on a cul-de-sac closest to the lake. He expressed concern about the �t problems, as the traffic count shows about 4700 cars per current traffic roble�s, Dakota. He . the number of vehicles day on North sake rotes that this � s twice as there should this collector. He said any additional ld b e on thi � minor users from the new subdivision would add to this serious traffic problem. He requested that the City address this 'pro f em 4 Troy Cana .,-i'ay, 12520. SW North Dakota, Tigard, disco sed the highhtraffic volume, much of which is coming from Deaverton « He expl ai ne there were. . g rd. a lot of vehicles using SW 12°�th to travel frog Beaverton to Ti a am o Earle Terry, Lake 10855 SW S ( D b he i s the Vice Pry s i dent tou e of the Sumner Lake Home ners Association. He expressed concern about the traffic problems on North Dakota: . .. .\ ...N .. ... ._ I...,. _ .. ES JULY 20, 1992.. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE S • Sandy Sari Orford, 14085 SW Kentucky Place, Beaverton said she is part owner of property at 11485 SW Anton Drive. She said her 'concern was that the lots seem smal l . Associate Planner advised that the lots were the same size as those in Anton Park I Subdivision, except for two ` lots which were smaller than 5,000 square feet. f 'u , Sri nford added that her other concern involved the corner lots which :.seated a ,difficult traffic situation trying to get around the island. Jane Hunt, 11105 SW 123rd Place, stated she lived on a cul-de-sac in e�c sassed concern Anton Park �' S . Shy! p rn for the traffic issues, and she said the main problem is safety. She asked for help and said sa that 1' g people 9 ays livability was 1 ac.�.i n because e annc�t get out of their driveways vow or cross the street to get mail due to the high traffic volume, Mark Johnson spoke again reiterating the traffic issues and referred to g traffic He requested that the the high incidence. of :traffic accidents. � re nested tha Commission postpone a deg.. g a on on this subdivision until a traffic plan is .looked at and a decision can be reached on it. Rhonda Cul 1 i ns, 111.55 Si,' 12 4th _, Tigard, said i d she lives i n - e � � Anton Park I. She expressed concern about the safety. She explained there were of ca problems associated with the four -way stop, and there was not enough time for residents to get out of their driveways, as there were �s coming continuously. She also agreed it was unsafe for residents to cross the street to get their mail or to go to the park. She urged the Commission not Ito approve the subdivision until the safety issues es Were solved. halMcy Irwin, 11135 SW 125th, spoke abti�a��1 n�c�1 whi ch cal l s for a safe and �ffici ant transportation sy st�mShe asked Commissioners to look at the plan they are proposing to solve the traffic problems. Jacquelyn Glenn, 12500 SW North Dakota, said she was in agreement With the previous comments. She urged Commission to address the traffic issues before approving the subdivision. APPLICANT d S REBUTTAL o Jim Harris again stated theitr. willingness to work ofor h traffic ei neighbors, He stated this he •had not o ed that acc ording . P Prior to this meeia n He this new r��a os l to the. Comp Plan, Anton Drive is a minor collector. He urged the Commi sl on to keep the ttio issues separate. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o There was d15cussi on regarding . the designation on. of North Dakota . ko �a as minor collector and the current daily traffic volumes. City, Engineer Weal. q from Commissioners explained that consideration answered uesti ona► o� ss1 oners and ex 1 was de. n ng given to a signal at the i nte, rsecti4n with North Da kota ate Planner .answered questions pertaining ^erlay, o Assoc, n rtai ni n the the PD 0'�e Which he said provides flexibility as far as lot sizes and sQ backs. PLA .. i KING CO IISSION tr INUTES �111LT 2®, 1g3 PI G I. • . • = , 1•4...■ • • • • City Engineer, an wereol questions concerning the e, of speed bumps. He discut.Sed the improvements to Scholl,sFerry Road, Which he said should help divert some of the traffic 'away froni•North Dakota. piscut;ion fo/lowed regarding the concerns of the residents' and the devel'oper...; and there was ,general agreement ameng ,Commissioners that the hearing should 'be continued until the traffic issues are addressed. There i&s discussion regardirlf) .the appeal process. C OMNI tsiohe tr Saporta moved and Contnissione Hawley Seconded to continue the hearing to the August 11th eting. titution carried.by majority 4ote ofC,dmnissioners present, with Cenwni ssioner MoOre vot.iliq "nay." .,1 OTHER BUSINESS o • , Senior Planner Bewersdorf'f' encouraged Connnissioners to attend a Planning Connission training sesson in Lake Oswego on September 26, 1992. 'Senior Planner discussed Commission decisions which were called up for City Council meeting on July 28th, He said these were the Hart Subdivision, regarding the water treatment facility, and the Matrix Quastar Subdivision i:oncerring the road ektension. He advised that staff was recommending the decisions be upheld. o Regarding the resignation of Commissioner Barber, President Fyre read a letter of appreciation for Commissioner Barber's excellent service on • • the, Commission. He present ,ed her with a gavel and a card. COritfitiStitontti Barber expressed her appreciation to the staff for their efforts and to the Commissioners. President Fyre moved and Ccitemissioner Moore seconded to.elect , Commissioner Castile as Vice-President of the .Planning Coninission. Motion passed by unanimous vote of COmMissioners present. 7. ADJOURNMENT - 9:50 PM ATTEST:. 1 • F s oft i PE r Iva • i e n zw• • glen P. Fox, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 20; 1992 c s ga• et w t ••• PAGE S 1 ! • , • rv,1a�r.ri;r� ..wroprw�wr .4 .444 is .4' ro aywr #4:.1. ' +'. +eulkWak+ .xr411, RW�+ +iinra„i xwMrr.w nv�YWrMa •w+iFNN'KA�vJ�N+N�F'M'�AJr �Wbe- :w�LNM1M'XNhw! NyY:SY!'awW a f rplra: "NN4'w!w.�NMewM.k�:1.1r1 r4+ r.' hUwswF +..iaf,Yr�..iitii9kkMrhk.MwAV' sY4laNWjka11 tta YrA1FkYA+WIra ,kYF:x. ak'It a " +' mFu.XM t �I " +dcMPeti �A'n1i.JJK.'afirit W:K'la�ili�l'Y4Y.- WikWxrA NI Hd' If: 14NW" �a. kwktyllWlhMYJ J�k; + >a:rWJLihMYµMkd�YIMW4Y.IWYgMnW V,lakNA14.W IL:Id.�kY. YYP<k'ni k.w AY'.Ywx a:W �...Ah 4.111e,{:4r. tl r:Nl%W:•a. _d1Rlt',w" �, lY•1:r�ll..- JrvNsmW1:. i i..J!'1dRn A]a.1:;WIMk�1r,AY.YA+ti \p:' N iiNtYtr:; JIYWI( Y: dNrVi41{ utatl '.pIrSMU0.5WaleY�a4ek+trlpta.:µo yt:rIt WW:+ IWWrW.r*ItL.uMA.NDV'IFSiv:4lf:a . row +rrie.:wsw.w,w,A.eww�ww.uaawla+ k1. rw. wKwecrrvzruwwaww+, nx; nwrw. w+, �dn+ �MrA* c;*' �+ �+ u,++ u1+( aUa +�hta�Mi�Mwwp+KvJVawa>wN +t : J+:.' Yr. HWY; w: aJifn.. a:' �tlM11�WCF1, 4:. itlMKa14YY .1A�rry,t:K4a:YMaAR�4Y.:3; +iJ r a r.xu.u..,..t. al ..: x.oa:11 ion. • • rf 4 tIGAND PLANKING (ON$ISCYON AGENDA JULY 2G 1992 7:00 P.34. BOARD COWWTTHE DISCUSSION WITH MAYOR EDWARDS 7 :30 P.M. ONSi,,RAL TTIGARD CIVIC CZNTER a TOWN FALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD., T1< +.D, OiIEGON s 9 :10 . t * -J , -+ '_� a:-SCI V, WITH WIYOR rDWARDS.. 4.11121,12/. 1 n ALL TO OROFIt 2 . ROLL CALL 3. APPROVE MINUTE 4' PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS 5. , PUi3LIC REM INOS 5.1 OO1 92 T C 1 R N_� A1 r$EME T ND 400 CIOF T1 a PLPYILILIC OIVI ON (NPO #7) The City of Ti a 9 ia�.Ofl, p the dee .oat mn��f ompra�heneive Plana rd, Flanzaifa Oiv � � the C ma or by colt acto Thief aMeradaent will make Tigard" e �3acterial t0 � Tranep�c►r$ation .a Comprehenaivc Plan Trand)aortatiOn Map compatible with Vit® figashitagtOn County TranepoL atL , Plan functi na1 afeificat eye$e0: 1 amend etback Ref irDevelopme ad The Plan nine; i�i��►��eion also �xdpQ� ®,� $a a�ma Code Sectio-,,�a iP! #96.020 (Additional lard S qu Exceptioaae ) 4- o relileCt the change :n deeigal*tion of Scholls Ferry Road from arterial to major ooileCtOr. ION SUB �2 .0� 08,, _ fi.. NEP! 4 a ._ royal ®f _ h� 5.2 SUBDIVISION. � ..� �' R��.�PI�Gf�1T_ . POR �2 �..000� �e fo3.low#.ng 92 -00.14 SCEl�Z 83AWAl�DS -41X x MEYER Su'p�i�® ion for preliminary pli�t /Planned a d�►vela en$ appXicat�. � 1) '� _ 1.85 � Oel into: apmeftt o o " P Dave]. ra , in ba$wet�ti �, 7(�0 a r�sva�. to divide feet iva ®ire da � � �ta�rian�;�: oncept�x��1 $an ap appro�.�a . ,�o a1:3.ow afa Lrereaced lot depth to .ddt a ratio of 2.8 to 1 on once and 6, 800 a ace lot a ratio of 2.5 �C � �a2 Con nity ,Development cod e Cha 1a term � �2, � 80 88018° 'and 18.164; Co rehennive Plan Po .i0iee 18.1020 2, 1.1.20'1.1.10 18.150, 17.4.4 p • 161 and S l O A 10015,5w .. �± �p ��t,6T�+ &�M SW pp�� . ��y ,yam . �. s o , 7 G7 1, � � 1 t�9lM North Dakota e�, Y1C9rt�41 a�f kAtbh Park nue, between SW 121st Ave�a _. a a P0) t ].net Ave t. lot x,00) %ONE: itai Renidentiaal,, units/- re y Planned tevelapment overlay zone), the P.4' ?One allebtote p ® fa i � t i chel ceaie n t a ' unte, d u: p lexee, pnu p is oup po �$ft ditiene n+Me parka, reeide n tial reatme ntOmee, f�icy day care e home occupations, � ^� a�c�esikf etruc$uLes amon g othet ae ee. The p lmnned dovelo pe nti owerlay tons a110 ye lexiti1i$y r eg .rd g certain di nnen®ianal standards. C"al, ?R FIUSINESS ADJOUi SENT • BNPIW 3E THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OP TIGARD OREGON Regarding an application by Niemeyer /Edwards for subdivision of approximately 7 e 85 acres of laved at 10975 SW 121st Avenue in the Cit ' of Tigard, Oregon. . SUMMARY OP TES REQUEST CASE: ZNTON PARK No.1 SUBDIVISION Subdivision SUl6' 92 -0008 Planned Development Review PDR 92 -0003 Variance VAR 01 -0013 5MM1iY ‘i The app l icant requests Subdivision preliM . nary plat /Planned Develops ent: Review Conceptual plan a, .. r val to divide an approximately 7 85 acre parcel into fift one ota ranging in eize between approximately 4,700 ry rte ea�ea to Allow ore lot i� addition, _�� ana 7,350 � a Subdivision Variance is oqu have a lot depth -to -width ratio of approximately 2.7 to 1 whereas Code Section 18.164.060,►A.1. : al.. to depth-to- width eetabli ®he i® identical di:�h® November, 1984 Planning Commie ®ion approval. al '" f W.,,. g for phase two of the Eton Fay standard of 2.5 to 1. The props aubdivieio0 That approval has expired, APPLICANT: J. Niemeyer, c/o Roger Edwards 4500 a "ilee Way Lake Oawega, OR 97035 OWNER: Martha Schu]: 141350 SW Hazeltree Terrace :'igard, Oregon 97224 .. . . - g (Jim Harrie) 1 AGENT: i 2555�S`e7 Hall Boulavard Tigard, OR 97223 CONPRNHENIVE PLAN DESIGNATIOn: Medium Density Reaideatial ZONING D E3IGtATION : ° R-7 ( P -D ) Q leeidentia l ., # 7 unite/ a cre, Planned Developmen t overla y Lone) LOCATION: Weat of SW 11ibti Avenue, .north on Par* No.1 aubdiviaion h of Anon 040TM IS1 34CB, Tax Lot 100D AGENDA ITEM • STAFF REPORT SUB 92 -0003 AN TON PARK NO.2 • t . p apter9 . LA . _ .. W � �ot��u��it ` Devel.a e � � � p . n ®iv a 'l:an P it 18. �,02, 1:0:149, 15.150,, l>� b 161D, 8 d om ,reh� n� and 8,.1.3. STAFF RECOAtMEN DA.TION a Ap►prov`al s . bj ect to can 1itiona. ,lb CO 1.1 lo IX. FINDINGS ABOUT SITS AND SUARGUNDIVG8 Site size and ahane= Tax lot 100 eontain;e 7.8S acres !.e an °'L°' shape with 518 4feet of frontage on S' 121st Avenue and 1,111 feet of east-west dimsnsion. Site locations The site is located on the west side of SW 121st Avenue, approximately 100 feet north of the intersection of SW 121st and SW North Dakota Street. The site is north and east of the fully developed Anton 'Park No+. I subdivision. SW Anton Drive is stubbed into tax lot 100 in two ,cations from this subdivision as illustrated on the attached vicinity map as well as on the preliminary .plat. Ba istina jar.Letri_iclittegs Tax lot 100 is presently vacant and is covered with an old, apparently presently un- managed filbert orchard. A few other mature trees are also present in the northeastern corner of the site as shown on the preliminary plat. D. g2e2gxaphy and drair;agee The site slopes gradually from northeast to a.uthea ®t. Thera are no distinct drainagewtya on the Site. E. P n SSAAMst1 sin and.: zo Wins The site and adjoining properties t * the south and west Are designated Medium Density Residential on the ccelpr'ehensi' Plan Map and are zoned R -7 `PD) (Residential., 7 unite /acre, planned development t overlay zone). This property was zoned with the planned development overlay tome along with the area that is included in the Anton park, I subdivision (Z0 17-- 80) and was previously part of an approved conceptual development plan th : t included Anton Park M A I (riles S 10 -84 and PD -84)6 Surroundir g. land uses s Properties to the south; east, and west contain single family residences. The Meadole Creek apartments and the WoC,depiing Condominiums are located to the north of the site. 0. Via' ®weed u ®ei The applicant re :sate lAtib4littittibitiotelitiletty plat/Pla nned Development' Review conceptual plea approval 'to divid® they stab; egt parcel into fifty= one iota ranging in size between avotaximatelv 40100, and 1,350 eguare feet a ®illustrated on the preZ .. plant �, The 1 to are intended for g Y �l.n �:e fail � re®identiel na►eee In addition, a 8 . can �la►r.. • .: is reapaeated to a* loW _proposed lot aiv3��i 63 to have a lot depth -to- width r^it .. do appieettimatiely,,2. 7 to l: a;rhereas STAPP a. REPORT 8UB 92-.0068 AMTON PARK tom. gI , PAGE ' 2 ..a e Section 18.l64.060.A.l.b establishes a Maximum lot depth -to- width, standard of 2.5 to 1. The applicant's etatemett says that the variance is naceesitatad by the location of the existing southera stub of SW Anton Drive in . Anton Park No. I. The proposal is identical to the November, 1984 Planning Commission approval for phase two of the Anton Park subdivision (Files S 10 -84 and PD 5- pp 84) . That approval l has expired since too much time lapsed between the development of the two approved phases ,- of the Anton Park subdivision. The current applicant's engineer also did the design and engineering work for the earlier approval. Thai, applicant has ' submitted copies of the earlier approved preliminary plat. for n mh o materials. Anton a Park subdivision as part of the current _..ppl Publ R ices and _utilities: The preliminary utility plan proposes that the subdivision be served by extensions of existing sanitary sewers from the western and southern stubs of SW Anton Drive. The sanitary sewers would ter irate at manholes south of lots 74 and 73. Water service would be extended by an eight inch diameter teeter line looping through the development in the proposed street connecting to a dating water line' in Anton Park No. 1 A storm sewer would be extended from the exi.stig western stub of SW Anton Drive to serve the western portion of the proposes development. It is proposed that thee eastern portion of the proposed development be p drainage by surface flow on SW Anton Drive southward provided with storm to an esisting storm sewer and stormwater inlets at the intersection of SW Anton Drive and SW North Dakota Street. Streets av4 aCCeee' The site has 516 feet of ,frontage along SW 121st AVOrtne. SW .121st Avenue is functionally classified as a major collector Street. Si 121st Avenue along the sub ect ro ert Y has 10 feet of right - of-way Width from centerline and 22 feet ofP. centerline pavement from cOnterl,in® with eidewalkp cuthaii and storm drains. The subdivi ®ion would involve the creation of a local street connecting the two ;existing stubs of SW Anton Drive . thsi 'Anton Perk No: 1 subdivibion. The preliminary plat indicate® that a 50 foot right ofsWay LS intended ;tor this 'street and that the street will 3 e constructed mina confearanance with city standard®. In addition, the preliminary plat proposes that a 10 foot wide pedestrian easement (S) strad6le the , :' ,oundary between lots 70 mead 71 The pedestrian �eces �wa y would provide a can_ n eeton Iae'Staeeaa 8W Alston Drive and SW 121st Avenue. STAFF ' i onT sun §2 -00tS Mateo FAQ tie: II •r a o. wf - III. APPL! ABLI APPROVAL STANDARDS . �.. Chapter 118.52 contains standards d f,,r the a -7 zone. A single- family detached residential unit in a permitted use in t q zone. Detqched single-family reeladerataail llotai in the zone must c►ly with the following dimensional requirements* Minimum lot size Average minimum lot width Front setback Garage setback interior lot aide setback Corner yard setback Rear setback maximum bra .' 71 a ng height 5 000 .c,are feet 50 . feet 15 feet 20 feet 5 feet 10 feet 15 feet 35 feet Chapter 18.80 provides a process for providing a meana for creating planned environments throu ®h A h a � lict n of fleXible development t . purpose stater!) n it the intent of this to preserve to the greateat extent poaeible existing landaca pe fet rurea and amenities throu g h th e ut0 of site plazeriinag p roceduros that r- late the type and deiaign of a development to fence site The Planned D ; velapment process is permitted only through the p Develo nt overl,ady zone to a parcel a pi,a.csai�.:ion ®f the Planned through a zone chasge Pp i g application. LI the applicatiorn_ involveaa _ the subdivision, of land, the application for the zone change and the re ,iminar�y° approval may be heard ce ctterently. Approval pre plat : pm y e does not expire if an of t�.� Planned ieve ® ent Overlay zone approved conceptual plan is not acted upon. Approval of the p lid , er eighteen . �.. additional twelve months Planned Devel® •ant site development as b� extended � ®� tg�laasn av anorethd � and may � The minimum lot vjite, lot depth, and let ii.c:th standards of the underlying same shall not apply to a planned dovelops>aei t except as related to the density Computation. ®wilding height requirements of thee. underlying ten* shall net apply except within 100 feet An Estabuiehed Area. a .. . ' 'tort yurdl ®i Yard, and rem yard ee � zits. .. wart ntanin � it�i on the to dere aals>b tbacks of t e underlying zonne Shell not a i. exc enty the p i.nneter of the e`i g � .. ., . er , lic ri� hti of` wa An applicant may request ®setback froau pub g � ,. special setbacks to bi applied to the doiVelopment ur the Planning CommiaaiOX may eatablioh spacial setbacks. Co:, e�.ti e t '� +� o>n 18,804110 identifies aaip�ar ®1 e�ril:aSrian fair planned note with real► to the �� ®vei.apyn ®rcet ®it® �a3.aand d'f pa�tic�la�' current requoat iQ S.�.:^ti cfl 1®.8fl. i20. A. a a (i) ihic statad. aec tat N .; : reats, ui ldinga� aand of r bite elko ants sDta l be designd c dated t p'r ©eserCve t �' existing t�nri a , topograhy eared 6hd natural draainaa�; a to the aSaatoet went rafaeib STAFF REPORT, SUB 92 -0008 l� MSt PAIIK 1 o. II PAGE 4 • Chapter; W.88 contains 'solar access standards for new residential pm t solar access lot standard if cyavelo ent. A lot mats ..hc# basic Erol it has a north -south di,meneion of 90 feet or more and has a front lot line that is oriented within 30 degrees i:f a tree east- west axis. A subdivision complies with the basic ri uirement if 80% or more of the newly created lots ' meet or exceed '' this standard. a. Code section 18 4 d 16 040E (Adjustments. to Design Standards) state that the approval authority may reduce' the percentage of lots that must comply with section 18.88.040.0 (Design Standards) to the minimum extent necessary if it find8 the applicant has shown that existing site "condit; ona affect, the development opportunities of the site such that requiring full compliance with the .Soler design standards would reduce density, aignifieantlyt increase development cost, , or eliminate: amentt4e0., Conditions to be considered include Slope, significant natural features, shade from existing tree►®, and existing road or right -o E -way ,patter ?ne • Chapter 18.92 contains standards for denai tye The number of dwelling unite permitted is boBed m the rot development area, e g land d�edi;eated for public roads . xcludin sensitive land areas �tnd or parks, or for private roadways. To determine the number of lots, divide t he net development area by the niini.mum parcel size permitted by the zoning district. • Chapter 18.102 contains standards for clear vision at roadway/driveway/walkway y interaeons. No visual obstructions are permitted' between 3 and 8 feet above grade within 8peoikied vi, ion clearance triangle, depending on the type and size of accessway Chapter requires a permit and contains standards for removal me trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter four ground undeveloped pe ... tree feet above the round on una ®vela d lan�l� A aft ` for removal must coma 1y with the folio-wing criteria • The trees are dioea8ed, pi esent a danger to properly, r, interfere with utility service or traffic 8afety<,t b o The t tees have to be removed t o cond t r act Oro P o, ee d i mp rovements or to otherw ire utilize the aplicant' ppp rty in a reasonable manner; a. Th0 trees are nut headed to Prevent er'osid'bn, ins a ii;ity or drainage g Problems; The trees or as d needed to j totedi., near*/ trees as irab �i.�adbree�s are not . need lss balance between shade awl op$n e aace; he seat. araeter iii t. a�' ., heti.r.° cn � . , ,,. he area will not ka'e V itual, adv6r®e1y-affecte0 day► the true re 'a1 ;. and S! .° 'L pSV0At 608 92. -00 ®��+ yy��}��ry�y gikk �*o � p.�. 6i V" 6'3:�A:La1JP?71 �C"884d1. A'�1IO .L'i�4 ,r. • f . New vegetation planted by the *ppl ca t, if a nye will replace tit" aesthetic value of trees to be fit. Chapter 18.160 contains atnndards for sasubdiviaito of parcels into 4 or more lots. , ,to be approved, a prelieLnary plat seat cowty with the followinq criteria a a. The. proposal must comply with the City ° e Coepr hwneivo elan and the applicable zoning ordinance - and other applicable ordinances and regulations; The Proposed plat name, must not be duplioaative and oust otherwise satisfy the previsions of ORS Chepter 12; • The streets and goads; , must be laid out so an to c►Cnfore to the plate of subdivisions and maps of Partitions or subdivisions already it ppro ' d for adjoining pr oPerrty as to ection � nd in alb. other respects unless' City general, di>r ' thetCity determines it is in the Public interest to modify the street or road pattern .. • variances to Code -development stanch hdrii may be approved through thy, subdivision review process upon satie!facticrn of the following variance criterrias �.. There are special circumstances or OOndition0 affecting the property which are unusual nand' peculiar to the land as compared to other lands s isuil trly situated; • The variance is * censary for the proper design or function of the subdivision The grantin t of the varcia :ce will not be detriseot 1 to the p +,bl c healthe safety, and welfare or in juries era to the rights of other or ere of property; And • tile variance ad necessary for the preservation and enjoyment 01 a eubsetantial property right because of artn extraordinaxr heiledship which would result from atrict, ceiMgf'liardoe with the regulations Of thL title • ChApterr 18.164 con.bains standard* for *treats and titiliti.e. a. Section 18.164.030IA) requites streets within and taisising a deeelopKnent to be dowdier:tilted and WOrove4 begged on the c laseeificetis A of the r i rest. t►. Section 18.164.030(8) requires .a lOcal *trent to haaran a Minimum* 5O foot right -of' wily and 34r.fate Paved sAction between curbs and eid el. c • section 18.164.01 0 ( ) rigairoa local etrest aaa ►s of f or lend. AF lEt 0008 r ,.,NT0N r' i Ob YI PAOB 's p�l�ktT . Sus 92 ..... • 4 1. Section 18.164.060 prohibits lot depth from being more than 21 times the lot width, requires P25 least 25 feet of lot frontage on a street other than an alley, and discourages the creation of through lots. • Section 18.264.070 requires sidewalks adjoining all local testi lrntiel streets. f Sect Lon 18.164.090 regnire,- sanitary sewer service g. Sac :lean 18.164.100 requires adequate provisions for storm wet ar runoff and ;dedication of easements for storm drainage facilities. B. Applkablei.Setemeltsmagystlacies. citieefls will be provided t opportunity to participate in all • Policy . . �. provides the City will assure that � f �p� �r p p phases the planning and developmerst review process. �' ]ease o t . Policy 3.5.4 calls for an interconnected pedestrian /bikepathwry system throrivhovt the City., y p that all development within the Tigard urban . Policy ��. 1 provides lannin: area shall comply with applicable federal, state and 3 planning p regional water quality standards. 4. Policy 7.1.2 provides the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will be provided and r'4 usigned to r",ity st .. ndarda and utilities placed underground. • Polio 7.3.1 provides the City will doaordinate watexw services with water districts. gn an • Z�l�i ' 7.4 0 4 r® �.rem� all xnaw development t� be coaeCterl to approved sanit .: aswer system. • Poliuy 8.1.1 pro !idea the City will plan for a safe and offioioin't street end roadway system that -Meets We're,* needs and anticipated feature growth greitAti and develont. 1� r • Policy 8.1.3 provides the City t i .l requi et, as a precondition of a' approval that, e q, Development or have other adequettk abut, ,a� dedicated ®tr ®gat Access 4, • b o Street a ighttkile,k,tay shall b+ dadLcated where thai str ®et i ®esizsoa�redarb width C. Tier developer shall ooiit to construction Of the street® b rbe and sidewalks to tifiy stairidardn within the darvtslo =ant sTsr 808 92 0008 = i w oN PAIU NO. II p1G2 1 d It MN • The developer shall participate in the improvement sent of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of tho development r impacts; e. Stre; ;:t improvements a ents shall be made and street aige s or signals teahall be provided when the developoleut Le found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. IV. NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department hhe provide4 the following Comments r °garding the proposed street pattern: lot,.:viously, during City Council discussions of SW North Dakota Street traffic issues, rceidente of the Anton Park No. I area have asked if the second!. phase of Anton Park could be re- designed to provide a direr.-t connection to 121ot Avenuie. The thought was that a new street connection might allow the closing of North to is Street to through traffic. After further ,inVee cigat eon, we do not recommend a ixec a Connection to 121st for the following reasonrss We cannot find a way to re- design the o& cnd Phase withesut lots that face directly onto the new strelt. Any optiOne that we can find would require tae removal of some of the existing homes in the first phase o7r would require a eubatantlal reduction in the ntU beer of lots in the eeecoi d. phase. These Optiono seem impracticable. If the new street cannot be designed Without direct access from adjoining lots, then the new street will be no more eatiafactory a a collector ate .'et than is the existing North Dakota Street. We would marely be shifting traffic probl.e mo from one street to another. Conoti acting a new interaectien on 121st Avenue would create oome potential traffic ehfety concerns on 121ot (a major collector street). Due to the locations of g4 Manzanita Court and exieting drivewa re along the east aide of 121st, an extension of Anton brave to 121®t Would t e, meet the int ersecticn agree e s ii�e.� r® ir►nt® , 4iollecter°' street. tI eoe r:Elia aono a We recce e �i�ic Street il�.g�t 1 p be retained„ ae pro»oeedl �c� ro4►;e�l �.'t]t 19�� , n that the th® Aprpel oant o the City of Wiget0 'Buildin g DiviNion h ase co�nteu that #i gate stordO drama and easements' eaehceuld be reg4ired for lots 92.114. the dity of tiqatd,Publio N ®tka Depart ant Tualetin valley Otte and' and�th® �etro� titan Ar�atCoi�rit ni.catica � E ta'dAZ,w�e�it W po cc .taeion havo ioead th STAFF IEtEPORT .n SUE 92-.0000 , .. pia ..a Sd COMM proposal mind have offered no comments or objections. The applir. ant should contact these utility providers regarding their requirements sad fees for utility lnstelistion. V. ICVALUATION or RFOUBST �mm= rissua�' ¢s�al svw wgnt • The proposed a uhdivi ' Lon /planned developtient c O°p line with the use etadattle ot i'..1 R -7 zoir►ing district o the hots are intended tQ be used for sine 3.® it r det lched dwelling unite. Because the site.` itri gene d with the planned Bevelopaaeat overlay wane, the iota need 'pet individually be consai stent with the minimum lot aiZe and t ethaCk tiviitements of the underlying gons,, The preliminary plat utilizes' the lot essize averaging a1loQaanc e of the Planned Development section of the Code resulting in several lots that are smaller than the R 7 one s 5,000 equate foot Minimum lot size. kiowever, the preliminary plat attempts to keep the propo:ied lot sues and other lot dLmeneione relatively Consi-etent with the underlying zone v s standards and with the ditdeneione of lots in neighbo ing developments. The proposed, development scheme Ls consi ®tent wi„rh the approval standards for a planned development (Code. Section 18.80.120.A(1) and (2)) as demonstrated by the prepe tied f ind>~ in ,this section ngs relative to the a bdivieion approval criteria and the proposed findinge presented for the various Code Chapters that staff has found applicable to th reque ®t. Staff finds that the requirements f the f�1.711 .owi Code Cha p ters are not directly applicable the CUP.: t.,..:14. review although future itkprovemaente orn the subject site subject the a Chapter 18.144, ? cceBsory Structuireen o Chapter 19.96, Addltiottal Yard Area ,ecpire mGnts$ Chapter 18498, Building I eu.i.gttt Limitaationea Eaceeptiofe Ciaipter 1841000 landscaping and ScreOntng= r)apteir 18e 1060 Paring and Chapter 18.114, Si•Ins. 3teff is charged) with tevieWing the conformance a of future im-proviarittihth With these standards thvO %gI L the building perittit and eigx geznit "eelbw processes as vell as thteugh continuing Code enforcement acttonn. °,,her planned de1elopmeBit review appr ieated unfit ®s? Coe D eastiA_ .n' p 120 .A(3) d o not direct apply to thin propo ea l since eGrt ®rirr relate to m ltip le unit planned dew ®l®psne�te a uault i la�il r nonce si9deati . l te re�elo on s that or p i ate o�anap c a:reatiorn fae ili.ti.es, ar sited that development constrcaainte such aea stoop mopes Or floesdpititic 3 Pro r o seied lot .. 71 gild 110.431 are excluded f � access 6f iwte that need tbt he con � � ®....rca,nt �- r� the ®o �idereen emaleritlalti ®� to .,the a �► �" . atto optlio at deeie etotilard ( Code Within ��® ®o . �� for n . l eccea cant req Teets that the Cbmmi!ei.on o.. , -" Pik 8eacti.e�n 1� 88 e�� 'rhea r� �. a . , adivaat propose lots Clio 640 and 113 Out of the solar aver ee fOrr. i. - - - TON P NO. 11 S�,F REPORT �B® �i OpQ�B * J. PAGT 9 M�+ .0 new development calculation due to the east -west orientation of these lots being pre - determined ` by the alignment of the "southern stub of SW Anton Dive. Code ,Section 18.88.060.S.1.e (eat) and (iv) permit the approval authority to r .xi a g the per aata of r ,lots that must comply with the solar access for new dheveloPment standard if existing rigUt .of -ways or road Patterns nt the lots from being oriented for solar access. Staff concurs that thous lots should be adjusted out of the calcelati ®o. All otUr proposed lots meet the basic solat access design standards because these lots have a frc`snt lot line that is within 30 degrees of true north- south and a Slnieuis north-south dimension of 90 feet. Therefore, the required 80 percent of proposed lots that have not been adjusted out of the calculation for cause meet the basic solar design standard of Code '.,haptor 18.88. The proposed subdivision complies with the der sits, standards of C1"�nd ter 18.92 because the approximately tely 258, 590 sg *are foot net developable area of the site (after deductions for right -of -way dedication) yields an opportunity for fifty-two dwelling units under 'the R -7 zoning dGsignatian. nifty -one single family residential l' is are proposed. 4. intersections eR n c at and street corners consistent with iaato the standards of i Chapter 18.102 since no signs are proposed at the entrances to phase two and because required building setbacks will keep buildiiiga out of required vision clearance areas. 8. Chapter 18.150 rrequiros that the number of trees over six inches in diameter that are removed during the course of construction be minimized. tree remo al can be approved if removal is necessary to 'reasonably allow for development of a site or there are safety or tree health reas ons for all some the removal. It is yeas bnabie to remove all 6r moat of the filbert rt treese on this Site hedatiae these trees would not be Maintained an an orchard after subdivision and failure to manage these trees can result in these trees harboring diseases or insects that may threateri ,filbert orchards in the general area However, cars) shoe/0 be taken LTA drdvelo�nent it detailed h : e i g utility p for whin the � dig,! and r�t,iAit leans far' ' senbdiv tsion and it se i g ho the eye®igrus . for the lots to main as many, of the other excistix g tire a on the Site. It ab are that moont if het ill. of the exit/tint; treaS that Mould l % ,located in the' backyards of lots 71-78 can be retaaited ww:l t) out, interfering with the deva lopaabil ,ty� of ghee d lots beta these i.ot ®a Well sear be a benefit for future r idents of s 1. residents Of the ineighboa i ag develOpriantn tc the sort a. tan' in additioH, the site's developer should coaSid*r Uhether the fist and hawthearns+ trees on preipoaod lots 6941 Can hO retained,, No tree removal or Site grading should be anoi d to r !f,sae to Planning iiiv�iSitoa review an d approval ,�f 5 *.it*e ras vas ,1244 110,4,. The a.. la.cant E t Plil 'Prlivide aht serVie ae c9' auin 9 arbcyri ®t in - aiaeee�etin the tare's semrai iElnt'I grad3hgg pld�►i �.n the interest of prescribing grotective fsiiaei tot eaCiieting trs be _ employed during conetruotion on flee Otte. Sr,eAFP RRPORT - S tJH 92 0008 - ANTON i th+ proposed subdivision j.e 'cone ,aunt , with the requi mefte o� Chapter 13.160 becau0e2 e• The p opog d subdiivieion comP1icti 4$ th the :ennprehonei►� "a , Plan Mapes At®dium Denoity Re ideatia1 i nation' dainait�,+ opportunity f c r the ait.•. ae 11, an with the apglieehliv' plan po1iciee,. the regulation of the R°7 zone-, ,end d other aPPliclable r'eguIeic',c f . The propesed =,7,1.1a0 I@ tPle aubdivLsion, Antcrn Pars Jo. 2., ,'.0 � ,p y p n east sip, lict�tave� of asurr otAe�r l+at recorded in Waaa�ain Covaty other than the 'adjoining first phase • SO, Amon A� �.v e' wiil Provide f:~Jr adegg to cafe afe eeclectic e to c p. po ;. this, lot,a Y� t&ae ro ®ed ®ubdf;�r�.a�,�in. �taie street w�.�ll he required be improved to local steed t Stan larda,, d. Sty' f f ie well aware of the traff ooncerne of tI s�',!e Aide i�� nta of Anton park No. g eubdiviaion relative to ,traffic or SW Nth Dakota Street. In previouea dii.edu aiona With thin tit,/ aancil , reeidentri have auggceted that a g `. akota Strbkit and SW 12lst `� n h be dev �l Pzer through haoe II of the Anton, Perk through . ibdiv be order that North Dakota Street be o"i`� s�a�bdf�xie� ion In � ad to through traffic. ' hih wov Id result in a groat reduction in tt y. f'fic in Anton, Park No I but would on3 y ahift ` the r traffic through neighborbaod problem to Anton, Park X10. 11. Vhs1,16 this m4 ,-,i%" be beneficial- to the exitting r'eeidente Of knton Park MO. I, n .. efit to the I... addition, ae dithe� Engineering e$ De .,a gent' �pub]lic. In a P , 9" . ��? ®nits ergots requiring in ��aei.�,�e�it col�:l.ect�er et�reet in h• er.. ee 11 Mould 1) redUde ue giber oil 1pta in pha, ®e 11 due to increatiedh right o ofhbvaay de> nde► and 2 ) ., th!. ►e col .ector etreet would be dfffionit to ccinnect to 60 ttoirtn bak s a Street O a the west beoauao existing dwel.linc e on lots 29 and 30 of Anton Park 1 May be too cloe'- to a necessary Widening r, ti g. g y of the. .�:saietln r ntof�.��wa and 4.**OMent for the western ethb of 6W Anton Drive# between: theao lot .. , In additiot, Cede Section, 18.164.030(°4) atatee tB at caaee eball the „mtaggering of etre4 to Making "T" inter®®cti6ha at 061ie0tOre and ars teri&,1sy i`a dedigned eiac'h that ` love Of J., ?,,,,00a than 300 f4iiiit on a %ncb Ititidete $.®�Atitt `duz e� iittet the centerlines X41! attach . e 0 p ", r ®ate��. � � � ch lure_ 1A dhoti-west air, et lough Eton I ark 6�0. 11 + oul±�< t 00 • 10 to pdti A of :` ith aW i:23.et Avenue la chhth takkce wick thio tra 'f is i afetJ related etas lard *: nXeee the street. sae. direc tly it Tina oitti SW .amanita Cohic°t on the east e*de of 601 121eg. If thi.e street writ diareotiy ii ied up Witb Sid 3anranith dou t, traf is would b� ceq i � ► ' � cluiria4 to .apaikh a epalck jog north►.xaardl )'o6 II, Which !easy pr0 ltar luaOther h arafirdou® traffic eitatatioai A1a0P in''eraecti n woe? d mato the lotea +on 4ither ®!flea tO w bac ane' tripl+a frontage ,ote, 0 highly un d irabl.e dai ua :oaap $14t#:: ,, RT X00 92 QIoo AhT ►N P B�11p 11' While staff underatale' the Aurnton - 7 Pe r rch 1 to i t t o atPf* r io • Tho pr pos d eubdiv eion 'cmnoi tent with t ►nta concerns, we do flee any olu nt' to h l that can be obtained through the d rel of of ?tatcn without juEt th+ WO/40m, * r ot# r® m popsibly traffic prob1000 4. 401 that the Cenr3 ®rio spgxor� . the ire V�' 0 end an pretio n1y appoved with tho ►uai development . plai for both phare.O of Anos Pak., of Chaapter 18.164, or a611 be iaodifted to 00:'.40001000t r�►i;.' b t ®e� eau ,o because; ...,. sV =e �.��meont:a SW Anton Drive is propoaed co have a f ift lop 'wide s�ie htW ref -Waa, be ful lY tO#oved' rich sideiwa1k on both t ,den of • the .•.q . . , . ... ® �r� �L / and, .ave. a . m. in im al. grade; There te®, the, P�l ° 9 p .p y W}G for devflo p ng thin etroet com8 �s ®ntwith Code eta nca».., . er local street wi t►® d street agirade,► and improveinae: ts. b0 The 8W 1210 ewentto ,'frontage of the hits i& already prrged to major lle for street impa'eovement standards. c�. The propi see1 lad are conelittot.04. with Code stands tde for minimum 6tre►et frontage and other lot di tenlaion 11 et ndards including enaas "' p yr it St . th -to Width ratio in � . �, v � have a lot to wie�th a:a�ti�, e�toen �aIcee® o �r2 w,�,fe:ila utouls� tea .265 to 3 standard. . :ode 8eotion 18.164.060 44 1(b) vptates that tor. depth they not , eieed 2 e► 5 tree tine average 1,40th of the eil ° propseed lot 63 would have average ,4etedh of 136•6 feet to a width of 50 feet o ad depth to width' ratio of 2., 7 to r. t .: bode Section 38.1667Q►90 • asathorit®® the laQar.iig0 authority to grant variances to rot W standarde throught`he +subdi■ision review prscees. Rectionn 184160:120 providoi. ?e the operabie variance approld cr tearia� b The proposed lot depth to ,width ratio j ta�snce is neoess ,.ated by the a feting 148 foot 40t000- SOtweeh the .. , � .. "` ,. � � g taut ],ot 109 00 6 .121st �►v 86� Axntaw rdatn�rn m�tsnb o�, ue. thi�l0 n►ituation here 00eti,gQ ettteeti loc-tionn. .1100eosatate the 40 060'000' ared #.0.teL00040 t0 a Yetiative1 V un;<a6uaI, ditodm0t0a600 Padaliat to this nits as aoepared to other par0e10 that are 0114010.1cY 00000: tti I 1t 0rdar to areatea in this areas that wouid bpi' tatLo while oont, Homy 8 CA1'�n i�stf3nt with the gig to �. �' � .. , � f'enQty wide and a hso�3.matel ..1'14500 u ®4 ar`a �`� � At a i ®sat a�n to the configuration of tied lot 100, a J of gith44. •, peo bt have e3 irinated n t� � lit f to tier to accd; nodat0 lo of this *tit* it a xa�tie' and d ii 010x0 u1d cAluse an undue hi ed ®hip to the propotiorno owned any; /ot` prodliectiimi develop+ F rthvitc it 1* Onellte how 8 "A 'p REPO AT r bUti 9246068 iTcN i'tOtt nip °• : ;0"-- _ • G. s�- the Currently 11ggopo ed lot dimensions might negatively affect the bu .ldilabi1ity of lot 63 or negatively affect any l The requested variance is therefore tic purposes. necessary for the proper design of this subdivioiQn Since expanding the width of lot 63 in crd> r to meet this depi:h to width ratio standard would necessitate the probable lc as of a lot with no real improvement of the . subdivision. of of the proposed eubdi Y d ®, bu�,ldar.� l.it 1®t 63 0� the ra�isit e p The granting of the requested variance would not be detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare or, injurious the rights others. Staff cannot foresee any a cts u pon, other property owners or the public if the variance is granted. For the above reasons, staff finds that granting the requested variance to the 1�t,k depth to width ratio standards or proposed lot 63 is 'nstif ad recommends within the best interests of the public. Staff reco a pprovaal of the variance nce request plat .. reserve strip; d. The final last should inac3.ude a non -access rase p g ,. t3 1st Avenue. prohibiting access from ].gauss 63 �..� 71 �.0 3� 1 e. plicast " a preliminary plans for developing sanitary and storm sewers as well as peolie water lines will provide for adequate . necessary pxb _ � facilities. Existing and F ro eed P ubiie facilities will have adequate ^specify to service the proposed dewe2 oprenn , Necessary public facilities 'ill be required to be designotad consisten t with Chapter 18.164 and City of Tigard Dees' n Standard 1 anua1 Specifications �o,ar�ciaha ®_,,,,'a.an pol.cies 1. •1=i l %v subdivision id consi ®tent with Polity 2.1.1 because notici� of a .. his item case arovii ed the pp _ he,�'tria3g on �° ,. . application and the public 9 . p of aniratioin and to ov ners t<; to the nei inloorhoad planning g property the pI opoeed site has been �o rty in ,��h-� vicinity of the posted w1'4ta as sign noting that a land Ube cr development application on this bite Wad pending. In thil pr application n 4tif srence s "m r t, iia proposal., A3taff riedteinaaded than ass ainiraum 04004.4; wide pedetihrian bicycle pathway be . _ 1211`it Avenue b. provided ®vs�od �twaen e� Vinton �+r�:ve and S as art of the subdiviit .. a proposaed public impreVement ®. i p ilionn�, (4ppUc& tit finis proposed that a 10 foot Wide psar,deatriaan enOttment be pr ®v tio70and11: id ®d l�tt�een prbp<iead l�►i .. need . . ..., � , , the ;staff f finds th as r the path beea►i�ee of - ;; b at a need e�ici, ®ts fo mmb tauitiat t dditiona1. diets tide (i a*eeee of 1,100 aditt io sal, toot t betweon the ends of tho PieoPotold Pathifiak at A aton D rive and S.e 121st lvanUO) that pede eti.iann ,.or bicycliM a would nees1 to travel . to get to the 6�.t�:; g�oint .►.� a pathway fsa :.rant prsvavidedl. S APP REPORT RUO 02,0000 - »ITON PeNlit No. Y'1 13 .ti • While there are significant traffic safety reason's for not requiring a direct street coneect3,on from this® proposed development to SW y' the ewe reanons do r,ot exist for �,'�" ls►t Avenue, not providing a walkway ecerene.tion. The proposed developront is relatively clone to seeeral attractions that could be ctonvenient for pedestrian or bicycle traffi& if a pathway ie 'prattled (Greenway Town Avenue and Scholia Ferry Road). Staff believes ►` Oreenwa Center, Trinity Evangelical Church, and bus ®n SW 121st 1�eve nu Ferry that it is clearly is the blic' a beet interest to promote convenient pedestrian and bicycle circulation through the provision of a path in this area as a way of reducing vek;,izei : r traffic. Staff applauds the applicant's uillingneaB tic p , avide for this connection. In order to comply with Policy 4.2.1, conditions are warranted to require the developer to develop an erosion control plan ensuring s p on control standards for '-he Tualatin River Basta lasc part tof the ig �g t application and to pay Ca fee in lieu of constt°uctine am on -site water t y • it�.y. The ,� quality facility. y • ) g Department adv the construction of an developer be required 1:o pay a fee in lieu of on -site water quality facility. The site is considered unsuitable for development of an ones ite facility beraunts of its te, atively small size and location in the midst of a largely developed residential area. Payment construction of facility is authorized by the Ore g on Environmental, Quality Coranieeion and USA regelations i n cases where it ie undesirable >r iwpraotica1 to construct, a facility. This sebdivieion propo sal complies with Policy 7; .1.20 7 3.1, and 7.4.4 because the pta�r public ni storm ewer and public water s, �vice throughout and will provide for underground installation of phone, electricity, and cable television ,lines. 4. The subdivision proposal complies with Policy 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposed improvements to the �� „streets within and adjacent to the nubrliviaiox will be consistent w . City of Tigard standards for local streets as described above. 1 VI. CONCLUSION MD REOONEENDATIOU The Planning Division coatcludee that the prOpceied eubdivieione with modif ielationg, will promote the general. ! elfate of thee City/ and will not .bti aignif icrantly deteinieintal nor in jurcioue tp sierrotindifig lamed .ptiovittoit that develo o nt t)�� ocsure after this decision c omp l ®d with a ppiictbl® lscal etac e and federal law►e v Inoorg � . , .. _ ... ... � .' fared ra _ ®noise snd � ecrat pion of the p©indi:n a and conci,usiona contained here n, a►* rpo... g� the et:�af;� r ® rt� �;f oaf � 9 public teal i moray and eeSib iit a recoxv ed in tthie anattet a Staff redeitteandiiiiippraal Of Su1.rd ivf.ia3. ®n proposal S , ,, 2 r�bdi:ei: ®io Stitt 92 X10 ®8 for the t0... ®tzi 3hton dark Noe atak ect to the cond .i ONA whi ch .follow: STAFF REPORT a SUB 92 -0008 ANTON' PAAtt NO `11 OAGt 14 THE APPLICANT MOULD BE REWIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING - CONDITIONS PRIOR, TO RECORDING OF TEM FINAL W3Drin5ION PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY: The final plat shall be limited to the creation of fifty -one lots. All lots shall be fully dimensioned on the plat. 'file final plat shall nply with Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapt er92; City of Ttgard Corioniiity Development Code Chapter 18.169; and 'Washington COu coy standards; The plat shaan provide fors the dedication of all nece; eary right- of-Way for the proposed public street within tIl,e eubdivvieion, and The final plat shall include all/ standard public utility easements, a minimum 10 (zest wide pathway easement, and storm drainage easements as detaile4k in the conditions which follow. The final plat shall o tabli: -:h a one-foot non-acceGs reserve strip along 8W 121ot Avenue for Iota 63 -71. e. The applicant shall submit plans, obtain City approval and provide financial assurance for the construction of the following public' improvements: 3, a All public streets within the subdivision as specified in the following conditions; Li. etorm d system. Thera . ,; ve ivitt L]� be c ®ei.ned and donstructed in accordance with t:"ta�e„ 'omet moo„ i 3i.kl at Tigardl. The 3i�t�rovem�ent® shall bey coui;►ploted_ and acce„pted v the C...'G witis in t1e time frame specified in the •ublic assurance contra t. UNLESS OTHERW/SE NOTED, THE FOLLOWINO CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED AND 'PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSURED PRIOR THE RECORDING THE PLAT. ((Staff c47aaact for all recommended conditions is Chris Davie of the Engineering Departs ent, 639 - 4171, unless otherwise notod) . A minianum 8 -foot wide sphaltic concrete pedeatrian /bicycle pathway shall be constructed be.Ween SW Outten Drive and : ti 121st Avenue within a minimun 10 feat total width public pedea' riaan/bicycl i ®t a went (a ) see The paathwaay abal be provided aoadewhere between the northern boundary of proposed lot 68 end let 71. Adequate .. Site draitu4. to the laubl i c etormwater drainaoe sayste Shall � provided � p � ... -11a� ,. unle ®a .... � Can e�ent provided ter all A:eata. proposed at® e3torre drain and b� aba 1 be p ro sed .Lots S� , .... a ra tia >� 1 +� rovidlerd for , de nitrated how elee drainage from these lots ,can drain: to as public etorM shall bo provided where a private �at�a� ant � , atom* dtain� linocr sea other lots. A joint maintenance agteemett abalg be recorded with ea h lot accessing a common Private ntorM drain line. NTA! T CONTAdvi 8raad Roa6t, kduilidiieeg Division. S AJ,V 76 lu R JS &;un 92 1 • . The applicant shall be o roc iced t - iu pay the fan+ea as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency -(1 NOTE: This a two part fee which is aid at different nt time. The first portion a e paid with the public improvements which is for 'that portion of the development which inc ease the impervious area within than Public r'igh1:- of—way. The eetyond portion is paid at building permit issuance wbiah i3 for ;each individual lot • Two `2) sets of detailed public imprnavena e t plans and profile conntruction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction coat estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval. An erosion ' control plan shall be provided as part of the Public improvement drawings. The plan shall • conform to ''Erosion Control Plane - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1939. 7. An part of the public improvement plans the applicant shall apply ft)t and provide the necessary information to obtain a "Joint Permit" for erosion control. 8 A grading plan Shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours on each " lot, including elevatione tied to the top of curb elevations as Shown on the public improvement plane. 9. The applicant Shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainagewaye without aignif Lcantly` impacting properties downstream 10. Full width Street improvements for SW Anton Drive, including traffic control devices, mailbox clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway aprons, cutba, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed within the subdivisions 11. construction of the proposed public leprovemeet tall not co i enoe until after the Engineering Departraen►t Lice reviewed and approved the public improvements plane, a street opening pe .mi:t or construction compliance agreements has ,been e*eeated, execution of a developer engineer agreement and payment of all parinit fees 12. The applicant shall make an appointment tor a preir,ocadtteetioa Meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Depaattaent after appr3val of the public lam a ®veanent plans beat before etarting .work on the aite. The applicant, the applicant' as engineer and dtitteCtcle eha11 116 re iced to attend the meetinig prior to r+ cei vying the aappre)ved plan® dna p tAiti prior to the plat beeiftg recorded with, `waoh 13 notihn unto, the aplalctrit' shall provide a 'CI pe deer porfornria nce aaeaaaraanc of letter of co*nmitmont. Itu ata a1torY.ativeo the app1ic6.sit may has` a the reeekti d after the p� i a improvaatante hat *e beefs accepted b3f the d tY of T� r erd and has paoeted the a ppeop ?late mainternaance bend. gthiPp F1.$#O t SJJB 92 -0008. R. iTaC�g EA l No. 11 My tr removal or relocation on this property m :St be approved by the. naming Division through approva' of a tree °removal permit and approval,. of, the grading plan. Trees over six :inchea in diameter' shall rea red only me tar neceaesa ry to oorinaatrunt,: Fit Teeter utilities/ and re®idenoeao The Planning Division may r '`°'~ a�� 3f e�uir� ,�aa,�t the applicant provide for dare stbcari»t to review the pins for grading and tree proteotien« The applicant shall protect, those trees which are to be priBeerved by miaticiag and feeaiaing the rootline®' of thoie trees in order to Protect the tr®ralae and roots fruit the effects At construction activities.: The applioant • W a boriet or the Planninv ,Divieien taw tteacribe special protective measures for trees to be raptained on the site. A copy a the tree removal permit and approved grading' plan shad be available an.- ratite . during all tree removal, and grading activities. ST F' aiONTAC! : Jerry Offer, Planning Division. suBD VXS ON AppRovAL $A LL .� it SID ONLY IP Tan PIE PLAT as REc0RDED WITHIN EIGRTERN mcNTHs OF THE EPPECTIV DATE OF THIS Dn+ IXSX N. Jerry Off ; to DeVel lOp newt ;View Planner gTAVF REpcnT 048 9� %DgS ANTO.. g PAgK 140, dE ra IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF TRH FOLLOWING a *C IONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COLE; THIS IS NOT AN xxcLusIW LIST. 1. SECTION 10.160.170 Improvement agreement l3. Before city approval is certified ice: on the final Plat, and before approved construction lin® are ia�d� t9�� futdi vit® r' shall: 1 Execute and file an agreement with tb C apecifying the period within which Improvements and repairs! shall. b completed; 2- Include in the agreement provisions that if not completed within the period apectf ied, complete the cork and recover the full cost from the subdivider. its` Ea,3ineer a 11 rewired and such work is thnet City may and expenses The agreement shall stipulate improvnt fees and depoaaita ae may be rewired to be paid and may also provide for the conatruction of tho improvements in stages and fer the extension of time under speciic conditions therein stated in the contract. SECTION 18.160.180 Bond A. . Ae required by Section 10.160.170, the subdivider shall file with the agreement an aeourenue of performance supported by one o f the following: 1. An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial ineatitution authorized to transact buoineea® in the State of Oregon; 2. A Surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact busineaa in the State of Oregon which remains in forc a until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it May be t irminated,f of 3. mash. 8. T.he subdivider shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized iMprovement estimate, ceei:ified by a registered civil engineer, to assist the City Engine r in calculating the aunt of the performance assurance. Tito eabdivider shall rot cause termination of sir aUOw expiration of said guarantee W3th Cut having n g r � t sedured written authorization from the City. far SECTION 18.160.190 Filing and Adbordineg . the y a. ..' _lic��nt y � apgl►rC v�, Theo a1�1,P � Within aC! da s �f Oit. T reavi� aand bmit �r d is a>abl gi t to the count. fear ®i. >atilred Olt .County ��f�lla�'u ®h> �icia1a ao to lc uired by okg ORS Chapter" 92. STAFF REPORT SUN 02 -0008 ANT! N PARK ta0. I1 PACE 10 41, 7. h19 4' ..o 4 TA i64 0 • Upon final recording with the Count, :ehe applicant shall subm, t to the City` a mylar copy Of the 'recorded final riat.'` SitoTION 18, 162.080 Final Plat' AVplication Submission Regdlrements 1• 11:reecoPies of the partition plat , prepared by it land eurireyor or engineer licensed to practise in oregonp and necessary data or narrative. )a` • The+ Partition Plat and data or narrative shall be dream to the mi Aimum standardise set forth . by the Oregon Revised . Statutes (OR5. 92.05), Washing on Coainty, and by the City of Tigard- SECTION 10.162.110 centerline 4anomentati0ns Mos timent Box Itequirmeats • Centerline Hong entatil on for all Major Partitions: 1 • centerlines of all Street a 'd roadway rights-of-way The Dente � .. shall be monumented an prescribed in ORS 92.060(2) before City a/ocepts nae of Street i mpprovementa 'Under thsb► following' specifications: as a Centerline montzznen have monti ent � monuments are re�nisrs�d to h boxes conforming to O ty standards set for those . monuments within the tAvement area a and b. The tops of all monument boxes Shall be set to finisthed pavement grade. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS , 18.:164.030 Streets 1 • No development shall oc0Ur %lidlesss the: development had frontage or approved access to a Public street 2. unissaa otherwise indicated on an agprovaid street Plan t�,e' street right -of � -Way and roadway widths ®hall not be lead than the minimum width described below: a. Local streets 0 feet 6trr`aet Width - 34 feet Future Qxtells PMs of dt r etc and X d e A1e Gtr ipat. . A reV erve strip scrods the end of a dediC aced Street,, shall be deeded to the (0ity$ and . ar , . . .... a rust fid at the end of the • A �� r�:c�ade shall be cc�n °�� e ree' by the Property o'l'3nern what.Ch " oriels not be read` uaut .l authorized by the Oity Engineer, the coat of t'ahLch abet). be inciudod in the Street coostruc 7 Lon coat . The city shall install ali street ntg aa, relative is traffiC control and Street naMS040 aO 0P edified fled by the dit d P NCB. II Tom' >�1~t2' � SUB g2- �t�11A . 7�� • Engineer for ` j eevelo nt. The coot of eigna ahall`' the responsibility Of the developer. 13treet Cross Sectional Surface material shell he of Class C or E seaphltic conCretef Tho 'placed 1. new final lift shall ' be p o� , al b. co structiOn rCi dway® pricr to: City final acceptance of the ro&dw WA hOwevor, not 'before 90 Percent of the structures in the new development are completed unless three years have elapsed since initiation of conatruct.ra in they development p -� co the final lift shall be Class B asphaltic eoncret as defined by A. P.W. A. standard specification cation d. No lift shall be le®e than 1-1/2 inn; yes in thic)caess. 18.154.'120 Utilities 1. ► .l utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television rvices arid related facilities shat]. b ► placed underground, except t or u*rface Mounted tran a formeks, surface mounted connection tion ba�em and meter cabinets whi‘ah y be placed ground, temporary utili p aerrice facilities d rL construction; hihh caPecity saectric lines operating at 50,000 vtilta or above. 13.164.130 Cash or Bond Required ,. All improvements Installed by the subdivider shall be guaranteed a . to work maesbi' p and material 4!or a period of year g acceptancer by the CLi y. one oar following P .. bond 2. Such guarantee shall �e catP the i� .xQv��nt® ae set by, the cash d Dai the, amount of the vel P City Engineer. The Cash or' bond shall comply with the termn and conditions oaf Section 18.160.160. m 10,154.150 tallations s isite/ No land division improvissentst including Stan tart' : aware v storm sewers, etrenet , iidewla1ke a oSrbe s Lighting ; or other requirements shalt bs undertakon excepi after the plans the CLt" Permit fed paid therefor have been a road yr and permit iosued. 18d164m180 Notice to City RegOired S° APP R1 poiix SUIi3 02 006a - iiNT014 PAC NCi PAGE 26 • Work shall *at; begin until the City ha been notified in advance+ • If work is discontinued for any . reason, it d';ha1.1 '&1ot resumed Until the City is notifies. • 18.154.2'00 Engineer's Cesytifica$ .on Requires Tifida land divider's engineer shall provide so Bitten certification of . a form provided. by -the City tF,a�; all improvements, workmanship ; and mater,A,a ";a are in . accord with current and standard engineering and d futruction practices, and are of high grade, prior the City acceptances of the aubdi iiaiort' a improvements rovements ; or any poziticn thereof for operation and mairntenance. atAlrio a gtionv glut 02,..6008 s.1h E lRL 3L! MMER ORIVE AN' ON ipAiR.K NO PROJECT OVER f I .EW LOCATION The Project SW 121st _ Avenue north of North is west side of � Dakota Street. Al vicinity map is . shown on the proposed Preliminary plat. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The site is comprised of Tax Lot 100, Flap 15 1 3408. Gross acreage, of the site is approximately 7.55 acres. Zoning of the site is R -7 (PD) (Residential, 7 units /acre. planned development). The property generally slopes from the northeast to the rPgoutkwest at an average gradient of 2.5 percent. Tree cover is old uncultivated filbert trees. Anton drive is stubbed into the site near _ the northwest c,romeJr and also near the southeast corner. PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT ACTION The subject site is the second phase of the Anton Park development which was approved in November 1 984 A copy of this approved preliminary plat is enclosed The City case files for this approval are PD 5 -84 and 5 10 -84.. In September, 1990 the City planning staff determined that the preliminary plat approval had expired and a new preliminary plat for phase 2 must be submitted. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL the same conf nration as. that The development proposal, t � 1984 1 to create 51 single-family detached home sites from approximately 5,000 to 6.800 square feet, The 51 lots proposed is less than that allowed for the site in the zone A variance to the lot Width e ..th ratio is required for p sed Lot .., � to � a n accordance �� ._ . �: . prvpo 63. The street was constrUcted ' , y.. rdance with the approved preliminary plat which set the depth of the lot. SERVICES & UTILITIES aplsroved n ranging in size f1 r ewe sto ,.•.y+..... _q... u� .:. ®.. �an d.t�i � . .�G1'VGra r2t4n4+er, �itl1 sdtrb �eei �t 4A�st4u0 b.s to the site, t e uti water supply ? nd � R"�a Va are av4a 1 able i.n ! OLAE _ ACC T',he so 1 ar ac:ess data sheets are ent l oaeo . [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] SOLAR ACCESS DATA FRO ECT Anton Park No. : C BASIC' REQUIREMENT LOTS SOLAR BLDG._ LINE: LOTS LOT ?' ! N/.S DIMENSION ORIENTATION DISTANCE l ORIENTATION 63 EXEMPT LOTS 20% EXEMPTION DENSITY /COST AMENITIES EXIST SHADE SETBACK AEC)? Note Note 1 15 de . s 0,de- ? 100": 100'' 76_ 7a. 10(r` 100' 81 1 C 82 100' 83 100' 84 �. 65= d= 0:det. 0d'_ 0 deg. 0 deg., 0 de.'� 0_ d. 8$. 100' 0 d 66' 100' 0 deg. 100' 0 dvj4 91 100' Od®_; 100' ad ., 3 9 100' ad 100' 0d 1M II .. Nate:1: Lot 64 id;Lot113:orientation:a ru neccsssari!y E: ill; duetb the sate boundary and existing street alignments.: LEGIBILITY STRIP. RROSECT;AntGn. Park No. 2. BASIC. REQUI EMENT LO E LOT # N!S =DNENSION CRENThTI N': 9e 1 1 Q0 0 de 0 °dam. 98 1.00' 0 dew 09 10,0' 0 d' 100 100,; 0;;deg. 101 100' 0 10 . 1.00' 103 1 0 c___ ki? 104 101' 0 deg. 1.06 100' 0 deg. 106 100' 1` 0 g'� !7` 1 100' 1 _a de... 100' t 0 >d 100` { : dog. . SOLAR ACCESS DATA SOLAR � S [LDS. UNE LO": E 4&M FT LOTS DISTANCE OI EJTX lON. '20 %l EXEMPTIO DEN !Ti'1C 9 a � AMEN TIES FOIST. SHADE SETBACK RECD? DATE: 9/3/922 0'd Note 1 90.5 is 20 d ale 1 Lots FA 64 and t:11 02 are nec �' t1tnnit ®: kdcsnda + ena tin �tc��t a�ii_ E e>' Page_ 2 rt. IJ 1112 a • DATE: Jagsi n 1992 ,....., ST 'POP CO NTs RECEIVED PLANNtin JUL S'1 1992 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RV: SyBDlVISICN SUB 92 -O008 PLANNED 0 P1 request 02 i`�� w 3 92.0014 SCRiJLZ BDW 8- NIEMYXBR (NP' *7) approval of the following devA i.opnant applications: 1) Subdivision preliminary plat /Planned Development conceptual plan approval to divide a 7.85 ,G re parcel. into 51 lots ranging between 4,'700 and 6,000 square feet in oases 2) Variance approval to allow an increased spat width to depth ratio of 2.8 to 1 on one lot where a ratio of 2.5 to 1 is normally required. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, ' 80.aa, 18.88, 18.180, le. 11.60, and 18.164. LOCATION: 10975 SW 121st Avenuet between SW 121st Avenue and SW N©x:th Dakota Street,- north of Paton Park. I. (104 T74 181 34CB, tax lot 100) ZONAA R -7 (PD) (Residential, 7 r 1ite /ar,;re, Planned Developaitent) The Rv7 one allows single 2a ni3- detached/ attached residential units, duplexes, public support facilities, home m ®b.lo hom® parks,.:.. residential eei.den�ia1Lh®fra homes, tanks, and care, ay �!�® occupations, _temporary uses, r. structures among other cries. Attached Plan and applicant's etat ei t for r3.�ei a and view. From £ nfo cation su plies, from other ip the Site ric�ur� departments and agencies information available to our staff, a report and recomuendation will be rc� ared p P and a deci sion will be rendered on the pl:opoeal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by lu , 19x,.. ' Vent may iz a the space provided below or attach a ser, arate le :ter to r6turn grazer colt onto. etztt t,. ..,,_.i...,,r.,s...,...�.._.. r ve� ��"�he . ataff contact noted below With y o ur c�c�imert� and rf � � r�nu1 in writing as Soo n a e possible. If you have any queation d aegaa dine this matter, i.bontact the Tigard 4 1 NE: f 23397, �' X125 SW Y�t�11, B1ti Ak 722. PHONE: 539-4171. Planning • �?e ar��cmerat PO Box Tigard, ca ST 'P CONTACT: Jer P Offer �,.,_... .. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS TO AT F„.P'P ►3i 2 We have reviewed the prop Kraal and have rao objet ioiil3 to it. please contact ,, _ of 6...2 o`fioe Pletbe 2'o3er to the: enclor8ed letter., Written (Comments: fi7 i.wa. .�,v,�r..,rarn.�. i..w�.'id w�w:n.w.�.�.� ._ .. �'.'. ".r+.�es�a.w' a. a.rw..r+...l•�wrw�nY+�...vs�w.� Natfle of Person Commenting "1.,. phone Nianber b /SUB�2 -a. AiO 4,/ N •11 4, .' LEGIBILITY STRIP rostlisairmeor 5 .RTON. SC OOL DISTRICT CITY /COUNTY RE-SIDENTIAL IMPACT STATEMENT Name of Development or Dr G:lo.Oer _ Anton. Park NO Neer of . Units: Single-family _ ult °family �. Dat 6L24 L9 Ava latse School. Capacity (: 3 ) Enrollment Impact of Prior Approved. Developments (4:) Enrollment Impact of this Development. (5) Potential School Enrollment (sum of columns 2,3,4) Elementary McKay Intermediate- Whitford High School. Beaverton 360 407 projected 9/ 1000 865 2000 1_902 58 4. 1054 (For esplanation of columns 1 though 5, see code on rev-se side) School(s) available capacity is adequate. ( For additional information, see Schedule A and. Status of Educational Standards and Quality Indicators for Core Facility Capacity.) Inadequate School(s) available capacity is inadequate. (For add. ti onal information, see Schedule A and Status of Educational, Sta s.rds and Quality Indicators for Core Facility Capacity. 1. The core facilities (restraoms , cafeteria library, etc..) are inadequate to r s=lpport additional students., 2 Classroom capacity is nadequ:ate to support additional students. 3 a. The Beaverton School District does not believe that it has sufficient annual os erat'ing income to educate additional students, without downgrading: the e*'. at.' received by existing students. Signed This school impact statement. :. for the above ina :r-ted. clopment,, and is Valid for 120 gays.; WM" VGIBILITY STRIP TMPACT: STATEMENT CODE Column: 1 Column 2.. Column 3 Available school capacity reflects: the available capacity after adjustments for Special Education program accommodations. Available capacity does not include current or potential portables. September 30th enrollment does ±ot include students hosed: in special programs. At the elementary level, kindergarten has been computed at one -had. Enre1ImGzt Impact of previously approved: developments °-determined by School. District housing formula;. (See School District housing formula below.) The nor is multiplied by a factor of 18 because experience indicates only 80 %- of all approved developments are actually constructed. Column 4: Enrollment Impact of requested development -determined by School District housing formula. Column Potential School nral ent-- determined by the sum of celumns ; 2, 3, and 4--and is utilized An conjunction with Status of Educational Standards and Quality Telicators for Core Facility Capacity in order to place a request f ti development in. "adequate". or "inadequate" category.. SCHOOL DISTRICT }DIMING FORMULA } 1p.yFani1' el1jn s .48 pre -first grade- children per dwelling .32 elementary students per c ailing .14 . nte.rrediate Ltudents per dwelling .07 high school students per dwelling .53 total school- age students per dwelling nitale- �'ail.�t .07 elementary' students per dwelling x 03 intermediate students per dwelling .02 high seshool students per dwelling .12 total school-age students per dwelling • ' a Schedule A BEAVERTON St410L DISTRICT CONS1DERATIOlik ALTERNATIVES TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE LEVEIZ OF SERVICE of bonded indebtedness - Beaverton School District has authorized 3� Amount ,- a The authorized bond naeas� a. COMIl pit but unasi sued bonded indebtedues these funds to construction of facilities which will not provide additional capacity in all areas . In the judgement of the District's School Board, ,. • cbtional bonded indebtedness att+erap is) obtain voter approval t� incur ad for the foreseeable future would be unsuccessful. of double shifti ea ti coded school .. 9:at is _ or ye� a _School 2. Ube the Dist ' Housing and Facilities Utilization Tank The report of t��e D►astract � Student Force to the Superintendent dated January 17, 1991, and the subsequent Superintendent's recommendation approved by the Board on February 25, 1991, proposed further investigation of double or triple shifting, a school periods, and year-round school. Such options would involve major pohc,� • z , program, and fiscal changes for the District The District does not believe that at present the non -bond alterna" ves are, viable responses e p ses t the need for additico.al. scl'�ool capacity generated f House fall 3565 (the Katz Bi11) iopmen.t application s . The initiatives de�Te' move in the direction of a longer school day and/or year fors d ntt, ' which double shifting or year round school would make very not impees Bible facilities ° The District presently has no 3. 'susinglo uiac.erutiilzed face , underutilized facilities, either nearby Y g the D District, to serve j � a or throughout the ,�iiSt the additional enrollment projected by the proposed ent. ° additional, Exten6ive busing of students is also contrary to the, District's policy of proviki!'g neighborhood schools. 4. Censtr action of new facilities ' Beaverton Sc1 ool District will open a new ' : ele��rnentary school aid 24 additional pernianent classrr�mrms in September �aaY 1992. It will also open a new middle school and a new high school in Se p i ember of 1994. The schools vwill provide permanent new capacity at t to be twee levels This capacity is necessary to serve students projected i i + ;,averton schools by the time those facilities opens In September of 1994, the District will move s ;th graders to riddle schools and ninth a�c atlhblD capacity at high. schools grad��z's to high school. This will reduce By � /p ��„,°, �..� capacity , _. ....... a rict "dN.ue a ele$IQenttd.�T schools . B" tl�t time, the J�astr' h v a ,`cev es ed attends ° possible adjustments. The have reviewed ,. attendance '�lc'E bt)ulld.araes for p►�BS' ,... ew facilities to serve students District does funds to com�str`�ict n. _ s root have fain t' ... developments. N,rther; the limitations imposed by Measure 5 from additional d � ' ° ..- . . ' have . i. funds to mean that the Beaverton services, � � , , � ..:.secretary, etc.) rto: Schcx District will not have suffic• en rats; (heat, light, custodial services, prine'ii , tc.) operate additional al faciLitios o ,,�:.. le classrooms - The District Board of Directors has ad.opted a new be 5. 1�► - ' a .. � � not to ib pmli�y that port��►le classrooms y in some car�.0 t� used for an extended period of le :1Yowever, 'they are nQ . o he ��hzed .. l ... ' ... 1. o o pect ' 1` �:t n�este Theta s r�anent solution to schoo . housing d ,� es. permanent rapacity ' . as a per portables replaced y p any new ' the s would be r. . foreseeable ., eeable future . Accordingly, Board has cunt Ktded that the foxes purchase and siting of additional portable eles;srooras is n,e ther ecl tcationall;T or fase y appropriate. S r the opinion of the District a ° tr� legal counsel .. t�1$3 D,�tr�iet does .�.� :, In th �+ not h i statuto:. a 'tthority to apose impact* Less u not have ... ....;.. '. . °vets The District des not consider combh anon of lt.erna "� �o�abina�edna�f a, . ,..�., �° b- sciao ®t eaoateitre the a ternatxwo as provid g ado ,iiate add..tionsl ition it Standards and Quality Indici for Core Facility Capacity Stia The principal 11 organize, direct and maintain tlee safety and security of the school environment for students, staff and parenti;. Stains of Acce +: tali`. -e 1.1 Core facilities, i.e., hallways, media centers, cafeteria, gyms, school office areas adequately accommodate staff, student and parent passage with r� minimum of congestion, special scheduling. 1.2 Traffic: and parking at peak periods, i.e., arrival, departure, and programs are manageable. 1.3 Student use of playgrounds and covered play areas for instruction or recess snows equal access to a variety of atlnlatie fields activiti€ . 1.4 Playgrounds r supervised ec9nonucally without an excessive drain of staff s resources away from instructional activities. ym, 11 , principal and 1.6 The deployment portables adequate oats ahur� lla�nce and staff then ability employ c! supervision. Standards for Educational Capacity er. aditasikrateamiltuk.arlaitime 1. T e it i problems c'tc by by renrolliv on+ w it houz invoking assis tance tavce for housing, capital outlay, or boundary relief ontsrde et, school resources or schoildlevel authority . n .J ' a Planned es within routine parameters of 2; ,,. The principal and staff are We to l improvements. ®veanean�a Special attention scheduling, ad�litnona regular staffing allocations and planned cap to .p p tt�i.ng, in�.to .ala or capital investment air eaxpla ned in the armament section; 4'. VII 190 19 '2 Mackitia49Viiiptite Skiseirliew bQt0te ndrd8QiiaiiyInd c.Chrr tianal Standards and Quality Indica9 for C ore Facility Capacity The principal provides for a healthy and personalized envaronnren 2,1 Restroom facilities for students End adults are accessible during passing time, recess, and lunch. 2.2 Access to ,drinking fountains io nd sinks for drinking and washing is adequate. 2.3 Cohesiveness and personalization of the rhool comity t . ty is maintained, i.e, students V ,eow Lae adults and adults know all of the children. 2.4 Health rooms have sufficient space to serve student needs during pear periods, 2.5 S t de r ts have adequate space in which to store p ersonal belongings cep4 46 4' peel-able eudeilturie perSor►4l atria . Acce. Lance , o i f►ef i i a 1 j The principal and staff are unable to solve extraOrditialy problems crated by overenralhrgnt without gaavolcing assistancd for housing, capital outlay, or bou adairy rchlief outside of school reE ources or schut, . 7iwel authority, p : program . ... issues within routine► - ,raanklters of ns and pla'ktned cs �it i im rovements, ape g 2 ��tufi�n The al at �1 and staff are able solve aid use issues attention to itch All ling, �, �additior��tl regular � ... � � . h staffing, anaterials or capital investment tiro explained ire th.c,3 comnnent +soctiOrd, May 19 1992 Mac\�"W "ad�,Bf w act lidaidtiteititittgaittild001461tylital,C110 tonal Stsmdards and Quality In Dore Facility )Capacity The p incipa'i provides an appropriate environment which respect ,cou identiality and ,revs student services, i.e. speech/language, psyaa hologist, 'volunteers.: atitioUrkalttitgin UnaceeptabL 2. Acceptable Stotus e,f Asks tankui tratnirson s 3.1 Voltuntekera 1 4agave appropriate spac ► to work With students and staaiff. 3.2 Ser'di en providers, both within the School District and outside the District, have appropriate epet,e to meet with students mid/or parents and Staff. 3.3 Confidentiality and privacy are provided where needed for consultation and conferences . s' 8aet iF Maxi Aiott to Per rt1,,' ioka Cup ck M �s &tenders& for Edu o tional 'Capacity 1f�e�nitia ox'° eA,cce. ce Co as ns .r lira is b The principal and stall awe unable solve e3 trapat'�!'dinary problem creates b Y areuo aunt without invoicing assistance for housin capital outlay, or otinde °ellef outside of oclnoo1 to ti' �, u�ea or school -level authority. gu _w able x) solve program and and use issues 'sues within robs a para1n ter y The a location ai planned capital naprovementc�, Specie? . a t n'jon to scbe+ddb , additienaal regular staffing eta p capital F �' staffing, matsriab or capital investment are explained in the corn►ont v e�ctic a. i0, 1992 macvahNn tSVia^2 stag ente iaktistandrdsoAdot dk-art ^M48 ... ""r_ s_ tional Standards and Quality Indica* for Core Facility Capacity Instructional Program The principal develops and implements school -level and Distract programs which maintain both instructional integrity and accessibility in accordance with District regulations and policies. 1. Unaccepttlble 2. Acceptable au ;Y L 4.1 comparable instruction instruction re a; l ess of the facility in which the is delivered. 4.2 Teachers, instructional assistants and specialists spend I as much of their tiote as po>, sible inhtructing children. 4.8 The staff is utilized efectivp iy in the implementation of all curricular programs. 4.4 Facilities are adequate to support expected outcomes within speciality areas and re lax sir ilassr000n_s. 4.5 Equipment and materials are adequate to :support eexpected outcomes within speciality areas and ',regular classrooms. Status of Acceptance 4.6 All students in a given class, regardless of number, have the optimum opportunities for learning. 4.7 Speciality areas are utilized for the purpose for which they were intended. 4.8 Teachers move minimally from room to room during the day so that the instruction prog i comp/arable, i.e., materials, equipment and technology t hand: Standards for Educational Capacity it: .. `.A en ^ g o D .. ,..,.a f extraordinary problems crevited by Noverenrol'lment �. �.., p:. � . , . .._ , boundary relief 1, ,.� ° x �, a principal and � L�°:r.t are unable. to solve �ctraordarna p without invoking assistance fr,r arousing, capital outlay, or , ry „ . outside of school resources or school-level authority. The p and staff ' are able to solve program and routine .. . of .. ,, , principal and use issues within .routine par�nieters of regular staffing allocations and planned capital improvements, S eci i attention to scheduling, additional staffing, materials or capital investment are explained in the comment section: (1) Comments nostarnarFasorms We are presevrHys 04- sbv 441 s `. SpeCigA14y 016 erie ts'(' Wit) "" jc tC 0r trA ie` Waif-van ' O *- Wf. Art conceroefiL -44A addiiional Afte w k , ` a h04- -1-r r 4be clost?vorets at rdv QA tiny e. May 19, 1992 Ma d\POJ,Athili itt Staiterrtent \ ,d.�trii drd`8Q iadt Xradic•Ql rl ational Standarb and Quality I n di for Core Facility Capacity Mainbanamm . . and Use of Fatal and Cowl& ritlinattnisi The principal provides , . fpr the effective ve use any maintenance of buildings, graui ds or equipment. Comments is 5.11. School facilities are .scheduled in a manner `hat maximizes their utilization while providing for reg la cleaning and maintenance 5.2 School grounds are scheduled and maintained in a manner that •eaaxirnizes their seasonal use while maintaining their usability during rainy weather. Open p 5.3 Q en � ace (not dedizat<:d classrooms or ecru facilities) is used to facilitate movement, engage students in active learning, and provide for an extension of learning which emerges from the classroom. oom: (i' rte bettie op'?" . 0e1; We. ilmm keet ovvelive entt . si bie i Oar (ASe 406448 Ift01/* 4111e Standards for i Aueat► otia1 Capr,1eit ► ].: ralalt• The prin o r al a ad s �� are ��ble to solve extraordinary problenp cireated by oviere rollr t without invoking assistance for housing, capi l outlay, or bpUn ar y' re i ei eu tiida of school resoirces or school -level authority. Aguittablat The a r incipal and staff are able to solve program and use iSsuee Within routine paremete ?a of re gular Staffing allocations and planned capital art rovoMents: Specil attention to seheduling1 Addition materials Or ca p 'te1 anestraent are ezpiaitted n tg. cennifaenti seetec• ;V" Mity l��c'l cr �rtn joac tiot rrieil ma d6mthir ,'aquti aty'ru ter hkt' District 48 P.O, Box, 200 ; Beaverton, Oregon 97075-0200 5p,1591 03 JOr °ty Pflug ocutive Director ,`'acelftics Planning and CGinstruction JerrNr C�ea` City of ¶ gard Planning Dep PO Box 23897 Tigard OR, 97223 t eaverton School : district is in receipt of your Request for Statement of Service Availability for schools. (Anton Park No . 2) The Shl � d.�.� ooDistrzct has revised the process for responding to these revues%. Your application for a proposed development of 51 dwellings will be forwarded to the three principals p aXs axd focal School Committees which serve the specific ar ea of your proposal. The District's rev ew process will take approximately 30 days. If you have any . questions, please don't hesitate to call Sincerely, PSS'Ir.:,vs6iG6aiemeraiml Forma\Reptof5e►aAvtlRegApp • Tigard - Tualatin School District 23J try Hibbard Act? tutistratiOf Cuter 13137 SW if c; Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 620 -1620 Fax (503) 684 -.2296 ns. 6, 199 pity of Tigard na Jerry Offer /Planning P + %ox 23597 `Ior,O R 97225 Dear Mr, Offer �8 response to your request for coMmenta, on the development c !ed Anton Park #2 -.:b the (SUB 92 -8) located West of 121st and South ' Anton :�e subject devc�,opient is located eav`ertoti School District. Bud Hillman u b Director of Optratkft TO JUNI'9199 RI S., COMMENT DATE: June 11 1992 PROP: Tigard Planning Department RE: SUBDIVISION. SUB 92-0088 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PIER 92.0002 VARIANCE VAR 92 -0014 S!' ED'W'AiiU5�-1 7[EMEY (NPO #7) A request fear approval of the following development applicativnsi. 1) Subdivision preliminary plat /Planned Development conceptual plan approval to divide a 7.85 acre parcel into 51 loin ranging between 4,700 and 6,800 square feet in ,size; 2) Variance approval to allow an increaser Lot width to depth ratio of :i.8 to 'a on one lot where a ratio of 2.5 to 1 is normally required APPLICABLE ` REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development ode Chapters 18.52, 18.80., 18.88, 18.150, 18.160, and 18.164. LOCATION: 10975 SW 121st Avenue, between SW 121st and SW North Dakota Street, .north of Antoci, Park I. (W►TTM 181 34C B, tax lot 100) ZONE: R-7 (PD) (Residential, 7 unite /ac 'e, Planned Development) The R-7 zone allows single family detached /attached residential units, duplexes, public support facilities, mobile home parks, residential treatment homes, family day care, home occupations„ temporary uses, residential fuel tanks, and accessory structuree among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's ; atement for your revieW. Frogs information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our etaff, a report and recorndation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you Wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by June a 22, 1992. You may use the apace provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If e u unable Yd ybt e on f r date please phone the staff cpecact not below wihy our comments and confirm your comments i writing as doon as possible. If yoU have any questions regarding this matters contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 37223. PHONE: 6at9 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jera:°y Cf fear,,,,. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOW /Nn ITEMS THhT APPLY We WiVe reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please Contact of our offir e. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: .2„2w Xs= of Verson Commenting Phsole Number: bkm SUB92 -08. BltM O, !' DATE: June 11,8_1992 FROM; Tigard Planning Darartment AB: KF 1NI IPB isin 22 -0008 PLANK ESP UB 22 122 .,. ..�.......�.....�. ( Bp oral of the follow .4.441 development applicationnz 1) Subdivision preliminary p .. Development � conceptual plan approval to divide a 7.85 acre parcel 3 nto 51 lots 3 ' 4,700 and 6,800 aqua re feet in size; 2) `Var3 snce approval to allow an increased lot widt'ih to depth ratio of 2.8 to Y,� 1 on one, lot *the:>e an ratio of 2.5 to 1 La vormally required. , GI HX,h RE !AE i ca ERxAt t:pity Dove lament Code Chapters 18.52, 18.80, 18.88, .1.6.150, 18.160, and 18.164 LOCATION: 10975 SW 12sat Avenue, between SW 121st Avenue and SW North Dakota Street, north of Al Aton Park I a MOTH I. 100) .- ® lr (Residential, 7 units /acre, Planned Develo ant) 0 The R 7 R-7 all y e t,l �,1 it y detached/attached residential units, duplexes, ,publiue support facilities, mobbile home parks, re identia1 treatment homes, iamily day care, home occupations, temporary uses, reeiewlnt a1 fuel tanks, and aceesscry structures among otA er uee6. r" attached is the Site Plan and applicant's stmt for your review. Fri anfo tion supplied T:ry various departments and agencies and from other e I ,o our staff, a report end recommendation will be prepared i and a decision will be rendered ti;`iit the � �opoeal is& the near future. f you wish to tut on this application, we deed jiour cmments . f 1992. You may use the a T � provided below or att ch a separate letter to retugu your cite. it� ae� od the aa noted ti burco nt ndcn o y oausnt in rin s on possible. If you have any veatioms regarding thin matter, contact the _T1arr 'Planning 60-$171. l °a Tigard, gard, ash 97223. r.11 : �. nnixs Department, FU Box STAY ' C0! TACTs JetryAgfer CHECK THE PoING xS THAT hay �r. rs posal and have no objections to it. kle have �'e�Y�l,�e+c:� t o PeAee contact of our office. Please refe, to the letter. t tte► .o nta ter` :.r..wvwwsr.�r i�rwr+w�raw..n -. ...i;M11 Tiallii+r r 1∎114, .ai.i+. n;..ee1. Hsi s of 'Pered:1 Conittentitga 1P1boi e a u en" bittaistna92 -08. DKR O i or BEQEMPligaJEOPIENTA DATE: s a s7u,�,:1 192 w FROM: Tigard P1annLnq Dep sltaenit € S°r. s ystax SUB 92-00(14_,PAND DEVELOPMENT IZilf_ 9�- »�CU®Q� VARIANCE 92-0014, SGH Z EDWA iD]S --NIE request t for era-Oval of the following development applications: �_ R �� ,� #7) �..' Subdivision preliminary pat /Planned Development conceptual plan approval to divide a 7.85 acre IP g betweezn 4,700 and. 6,800 square feet in size; ��oe�. into, 51 Lots ranging 2) Variance approval to allow an increased lot width to depth ratio of 2.8 tit 1 on one lot where a, ratio of 2.5 to l JO normally rewired. ALGOL/CABLE REVIEW W CRITERIA: Community Development Game Chapters 18.52, 13.130, 18. Se, 18.1.50, 18.160,;. Band 1s64. L CATIO 10975 SW 121st, ocs. Avenue, between SW 121st, Avenue and SW North Dakota Street,, north of Allt011. Park X. (WCT! 1S1 34CRq tr+v lot 1,00) ZONE: R -7 (PD) (Residential, 7 units /s rLe, P1anned Develog nt) The i-,7 za11e allows single family detached/aft . chvad reeaidenti -1 unite, duplexes, public support t.acilitiee, cs a mcikoita home park, residential treatment ho ea p £ ► 1y d :,y +c ee hem p rn, t por uses, res id.., itial fuel ta ks, ang.1 accessory structures among other uses Attack hed is the Site Plan pp ta 's s a n your review. From inforoation supplied by dap art and agencies and fro other iufarms Lion available to our staff, a :oport and r.ecommendation will be prepared and a disci : tendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to o men . +on this a►; cation, we need your comments by June 22 ,,. 1992. You may use the epM'e provided, `,3e1ow or attach a Separate letter to return your comments. u®w�o u v ��a. please phone the staff COntact ��t� and your cammOnts in writing ing as 10esaao11 as possible. %f you have any qu wsntiono regarding this ratter, contact the Tigard Planning Doparttment, Po 2orti 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR, 97223. PROWS: 639- 41710 STA'S`P CONTACT: ga og f ga PLEASE CU ECX 17 a3E FOLLOWING /TEES THAT AP I n We have reviewed the pr.pos a1 and have no objection z to it. Please contact of our office. se refer to the enCloe /tatter. Written 'Coe sontsst n _ —- n _ y mirmairrtr,.:. _ 1a r .aeasuhisil `4i.,. w�... r, , Maimorasiwijil _._—.-----------__t .. `w.00sess +tors .r rrswr6rtiys'od'a1601*mimisn...... ........, .. ...: i._..r .nswwar, N me of Person Commenting: PhOue Number: ,' bkm/SUB92.-08.BRM SUB92 OOQ8 0 Private storm drains shall be Provided a alone the re,: r lot lines plans for lots_ 1... s easements shall be provided where crossing other lots. The ��n3� pipe e S ize of . a pritrate rain drain hw 11 be as follows: Serving 1 house 3 inch Serving 2 hOt se s 4 inch Serving 3 -.6 houses 6 inch Serving 7-15 houses - 8 inch A joint ' access «and .me nten nce a ree un s recorded with � e� a11;�� h each lot. accessing a private storm drain follows: .4,ot: 114 A shall have an oval. right to use and nn . obligation to operate nd maintain th= private drain s facilities within the prilrate or public drainage ceasementi as shown Building Division FROM Ti.ga d Planning Department 1 � _S1_9 T B 92-0008 0D8 PI e) i�3� Fad i�I y_ALL9.2,Apj,.4 SCHULZ DW S -RISME (NPO t7) A request for approval a the fO1lowing development applications: 1) preliminary Subdivision plat /Planned Development conceptual playa approval to divide a 7.85 acr, parcel into 51 tote ranging between 4,700 and 6,F,'400 square feet in size; 2 Varietnce approval to allow an increa = ed lot c iLn ath to doh ratio of 2.8 to 1 on one lot where a ratio of 2.5 to 1 is normally required. APPLICABLE REVIEW ITERIA: Community Development Cod Chapters 18 52,, 8.80, 18.88, 18.160„ 18.160, and 18. 164. LOCATION: 10975 $W 121st apt lot 1 S? North Dakota Street, north of Anton �ven�ae, between SW 121et Avenue and ,.��ri Parr I. (We. ZONE: R -7 (PD) t tetai denti.a7., 7 unite /acre, P1ann d �Devela at') ) The Rt 7 zone allows' single family y ��151 detached/attached . a residential treatment � 1ro�.ic ..rapport fae;�.liti .. a, tla3le home parks, residential ianitn, ,��►la� ®s, s, family day carer hone occupations, temporary ;. ,• accestbo uses, re ; i.denti�t�. fuel. taxa��a m and structure among other ua , Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statentent for your review. Fran inforatat Lon supplied by various departmental and agencies and from other inforrriation availablL to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prep nd a cent on this application, we need your comments by June 1f You wish vision will be rendered on the proposal txn the near future. to 22, �...�2 tau may us43 the space provided below or attach a separate 1 w :tter to return your o nmentea roan ar linable to res n the above date pleasp in writing ff contact noted below withyour coy Brats and confirm our cements p as soon se photo the sta your ions � SW �a11 lie Tigard, con the Tigard peasei�a►lep of �¢��, have and questions regarding Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 , g NI : 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: 22g ., f r PLEASE CHECK THE I OLL /NG ITEMS THAT APPPLY « We h ..ve reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please Contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Far+ tten Cents 0. Nacre of Perot? Comm n1 itag: Phone Number: s4.. `t b /SUB92po8 �3RM 4 E. It JUN 1N2 M: Tigard Planning Depart ant la's OURDIVISION SUB 92-0008 VAR. 9 a ®®1.4 ��. EDW S-�MIE Ain (IWO 07) A request for approval of the following d elv tes* Oippiicatiogias 1) Subdivision preliminary plat/Planned Development car tncaa'gtual plan aroVl to divide a 7,85 acre parcel into 51 lots rangiL QI between 4,700 and 6,800 Square feet in sire; 2) Variance approval to ell ellow ad increased lot width to depth ratio of 2.8 to 1 on one lot "where a ratio of 2.5 to 1 is normally required. APPLICABLE VIEW XtERXA Ciouvaunity Development Coda Chapters 18.52, 1:50, 18.160, and 18,164, LOCATION: 10975 SW 121st Ave � .» Street north of Anton Avenue, between SW 321st Park 3: (WCTM 1S1 2403, tax let 100) ZONE. It 7 (PD) (Reid YAfi4i =1, 7 units/acre, Pi/awned Devel nt) The R -7 zone Llowe 5Lmg'.L family y ao,etached, attached residential .al. units, duple sea, Public support facilities, temporary esidential. fuel tank and aoce S mobile borne , parks, residential treatment hole,, famia dry care, s�ho e occ�alaa�tioane, uses, r ataructuree arouse; ether n®cea. Attached) is the Site Plan and applicant's 3tatemenat for your review. Fria information Supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information av Liable to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will Die rendered on the proposal in th-, near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your memento by June 22, 1992. You may u ®e the space provided below gar attach the a ovepar to letter 1 � y c'" nta. T ; out a�are exna�ib e : to eo ,and ` Peron staff contact have any eationa i eg dung this ,attar, Contact he Tog rd 1E n "" a� to a .gad e y _ i,mr a not = �bel,ow With your cou ata� and co your co nga in writing possible, ° d _ x Planning Department, �'� Box ��97 v 1�1,,�5 SW �aSll Blvd., �i,gard, OR 3722. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF COE TACT v 'err SSE annex TWA POLLOWTH G ITEMS THAT a.PPLy s XXXX cfe hav reviewed the proposal and have no cake = ctione to it. Please contact of our office. l = a ®e refer to the enclosed letter, Written Caefteg Neste of Person Commenting: ,�... ,.�. • .:.► OAS FROM: Tigard Planning Department ' S OR comma = DATE: ;,_J ne .� 1 MO2..a 4 R : BDEVXSXO SUB 92-0008 > L, 1i► )Q►. Dl 'C .+M J�>Q► TA Otll ANNE VAR _92. YL 'r (NPO #7) A requ St for tapprov: 1 of the following deA;m31.opment applications s 1) Subdivision preliminary plat /Planned Development; conceptual plan approval to divide a 7.85 are parcel into) 51 lots ranging betwe - r 4,700 and 6,800 square feet in size; 2) Variance approval. to allow an increased lot Width to depth ratio of 2.8 ' Y '� � 18.52, to 1 on one lot where a r.:tio of 2.5 to 1 is normally re it APPLICABLE B R V EW t RRI RIM C+ 1nnit Develops ant Code Ch= mere 18 52, and 18.164. LOCATION2 10815 aw 121ot Avenne between SW 121st Avea:ue and SW North Dakota Street, north of Anton SON: R--7 (PD) (Res "idential, P.�r.,os 1 (w1a".�NI 181 � _�>�B, '� i.a�it 1.QiQ 7 units /acre Planned Deve10 ent ) The R-7 Zane allows lli ngle faVaily . detach:, /attached residential. units, duplexes, public s upg rt. �ea�li.�ieh, mobile park � ®i.c a e,1 treatment h 4, family day care, home cuation , p ra s, a accessory structures among other srse i ry re 3.dea�i"�Yi..�1 fuel tam Attached is the Site Plan and aPpAic and statement � eax�3.+�� u and from ot'h. information supplied by various department 9 information available to our t:af, Tr, report and recommendation !gill be prepared and a be rendered on the proposa.1 in the near future, If you wish to cc er�t on this application, we need your cormatente by 3ptvite 22, 1992. You ray uoe the space provided below or attach a oeparate /atter to return your coaugenhs. T au e.r® unable to rem please phol{iie the staff ccitact aaoted below with your comments and corif irM your comments in writing as soon as If you � Pa Box 2239, :9n�125 8� �m�]� Blvd., Tigard, contact the T�,g��ard possible. any questions regarding this mat Planning Department, ®lit 97223. 3 ONS: 639-4171. a STAFF CONTACT: Derr . Offer PLEASE C NCR "ME FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no o) jectione to it. orammestainorar Pilease contact of our Of floe.. loe. Please refer to the enclosed lett r. Writer Cotta Nadte of PerOen COMmentingi Phone number b bkm /8U892 -'O8 B0 ommeitiimicsinariesaeriiimiorismi 1 IlEalgalariarggimullummammirawanwir 1f01 1 OM: Tigard Planning Department Es-, raa AIRINFAMIINfamalla RECEIVED PLANNING JUN181992 RE MST FOR mmiza 1 Mt DATE s .du 1992 RE: SUED/V/SION 0014 SC Z _ED S N18„�, (NPO A request for T VAR 9 ��......�. � � approval of A 8 MARAUD r the following development . pplicationss 1) Subdivision- preliminary plat /Planned Developanent conceotual plan approval to divide a 7.85 acre parcel into 51 lots ranging betweeia 4,700 and 6,800 acuar a feet in size; 2) Variance approval to allow n' incrrea. ®ea lot width to depth ratio oi: 2.8 to 1 on one lot where a ratio of 2.5 to 1 is normally rea i,'ed APIPLICABLE R XEW CRITERIA: eimagaity De elo ent Code Chapters 18.52, 18. 80, 18.D® / 18. 15 0p 18a 160, and dflLOCATION: 10975 8W et Avenue, between S W 121st Menus and SW �orth � ak�taStreRt, north of d8b4OY Park (WC 1'51 3408, tax lot 100) ZONE: R -7 (PD) (Residential, 7 _ unite /acre, Planned Development) Tea R-7 zone allows single family do tt ched /attached reaideuti :l unites, duplexea, public .,upport facilities, mobile _ home parks, re = ;Ldentiial trreatn: nt homes, family day came, home r uses, residential fuel. tank, and accessory occupations, temporary sttuctbnres among other uses. Attached Lee the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by ..7,une 22,, 1992. You may use the pace provided below or attach a separate letter to retuta your comments. "Lim Jars unable to . °ee_nai .. .t, '&'�n�s above ]Tease phone the . staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as upon as poasibles. IT you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, Pd) Boat 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,- OR 97223. i-BONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT. r�scryc _O__, fer, PLEASE CHECK FOLLOWING X'fENS T ; ` APPLY: XX We have reviewed thO propos 1 and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Pie se refer to the enclosed letter. XX Written dct,atente with .L develot�meni s water main site and location includinj' roved through the Water District water meters ill be reviewed and aPP .,�...,._ ff t locations will be coordinated c�'f ire. Final approval of fire hydrar`� , _�.. with Gene Bircha ]:] of l'u,alat3nVa11ey Fire & Rescue with :approval� the Water District Name of Person cerating: � Michael Mill2s.j..32rai.Lneering TeCh. III 6.3 15. 4 Phone Number n bkn /SUB92 -08. SE !i Magiq'T Mk COMMENTS ,FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SUBDIVISION SUB 92 -0008 `2?e9PJ, f� `fit :92 -OO14 SCHULZ ED WARDS-MIME BR (NPO #7) A reap et for pproval of the following development applications: 1) Subdivision pr �.i iina y+ plat /Planned Development conceptu l plan approv . to divide a 7.85 acre into nto 51 lots ranging between 4,700 and 6,800 square re 'feet in size; 2) Variance ar,p0ava1 to allow an tiecrea,sed lot ' width to depfeh ratio of 2.8 to 1 on one lot where a ratio of 2.5 to 1 is normally regulated. APPLICABLE EE'IEW CRITERIA: Community Deve3.opment Code Chapters 16.52, 18.80, 16.88, 28.150„ 16.160, and 1'4.164. LOCATION: 109Th SW 121st Avenue, between SW 3.21st Avenue and SGt North Dakota Street, north of Anton Park I. (WOTH 181 314CE, talc lot 100) ZONE. R.-7 (11 0) (Residential, uni.ta /acre, Planned Development) The R ®7 zono allows £LnJ1e family detached/attached detached/attached residential units, duplexes, pUb7cic support facilities, mobile home p rkea, :e ®identia1 treatment, homes, family day car -, home occupations, ��a, reSflentia1 fea�l t�ser and a cemeo struotureoxncnheru ®ea. Attached is the Y Site Plan and various departments Statement and a� agencies and review. �o�ie other information available to our staff, a revert and reoemmendation will be prepared and a decision Fill. be rendered OS the pr�'ipo�ir"sa. �.n the near future. If p wish to comment on this e,pplica3il;ion, we need your comment by ones 22, 1992. You say u e the space provided b& w or attach a eparate letter to return ;,; l xr counter= L 'beau are unable to reemeslakcamq.,,slAtjlels. please phone the staff contacp noted below with your commentia and confirm your Comments ae~ants in writing as soon as poasible. If you have any estiona e a is matt r, cor act the Tigatl Planning Department, � Eo Hall t Tigard, ' PHONE: 630-4171. STAPP CONTACT: PLEASE ('HECK THE POLZOWING ITEMS TEAT APYLIts We have revLet ?d the pre yo' and have no objections to it Please contact :.�_.�. of our office. P, tieaae refer to the enclosed letter. Tir.itten comments Name of Person 4 oia a rating Phone Number: ` d. bi /SDB92 -08. BKCM MOAT FOR T °N TS O: '� '! . ,,, DATE: June 11 1992 MOM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SUBDIVISION ppm 92.-0008,_ R9AL_D PDR 92 -0002 VARge +'�: _�, VAR 92e0014 edi t E � __ (rPO 7) A rev at for approval of the following development ape 13 D `tioa9: 1) Subdivision p e1i %i ► plat /*Manned Development conceptual p lan approval to divide a 7.85 acre parcol into 53. lots ranging ` between 4,700 and 6,800 square fee in adze; 2) Variance approval to allow an incroaaed lot width to depth ratio of '208 to 1 on one lot where a ratio of 2.5 to is normally required. APPLICABLE REVIEW W CRI IA: Coiaun„tty Development Cod a Chapters) 18.52, 18.80, 18.88, 18.150, 18.160, and nW w 164. �l Dakota SON; 10975 SW 121st north o Anton Avenue, between SW �.2 a.i�:t �'�/C�' � � Street, 81�L�"th ®:� �. $c0� . �nt ZONE: -4 `PD) (Residential, 7 unite /acre Planned Dever l lot �) �� The R -7 mine allows single family detached /attached residential units, dupiexea, upport f mobile home p rrka,, residential tr :' at ant home, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, reside ati:n,1 fuel tankui, and acaeeeo etructur among ocher uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant' a statement for your review. From t,nformation supplied by varicu a department and agencies and from other information available to oureon, tae report proposal in eveommendatiOn s future. will be prepared and a decision will be rendered � eedp your c�,'a:rnta by �'u � 1'�� you may to comment on this application, we need y 3� ay use the apace provided below et attach a separate letter to return your ,aouenta . lj u are ,and o _reencnL L je„ ;daatw . p lea se phone the taf f dontact n oted be�o� with y our co.erit® and confirm your comments in writing as noon Coe possible. If you have any eldestione regarding this matter, contoct the Tigard i 3. PHONE: Planning Department, �Q Mgr 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,--OR '722 639 -4171. STA'IP CONTACT: POSE CHEM T ,, FOLLOWING 'MS THAT APPLY We have reviewed the proposal and have no objectioas to it. Ple - se contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. tacit' ' en Comments: L a, ere of Penton Commenting: Phone Number: • O _ CITY OP TZ1A D, OREGON 'C1. Jerry Offer June 17, 1992 PROM: Chris Davies, Development Review Engineer ° SUB 92-0008 SCHULZ /EDWARDS -NIE Y R 129A2.01ption The applicant proposes to divide a parcel of approximately 7.85 acres into 51 lots. Also requested is variance approval to allow an increased ;lot width to depth ratio on one lot. �'indir�c�s 1. Streets: The site is located northwest of the S.W. 121st /North Dakota intersection. Access is provided from two different points off of S.W. North Dakota. S.W. 121st Avenue is adjacent to the east boundary of the proposed development and is classified as a major collector. The standards for a major collector, from centerline, include 30 feet of right -of -way, 22 feet of pavement, curb and sidewalk. S.W. 121st Avenue is fully improved along the frontage of the development and meets major collector standards The applicant i8 proposing to complete the connection, Of S.W. Anton Dr S.W. Anton Dr. is a ( loop street which, when completed, would connect with S.W. Forth Dakota at both ends In addition S.W. Anton Dr is a local street and the applicant proposing g l g improvements �,. is ro oszn to install all required m rovernez�,t.. to meet these standards. Traffic: y, _ g Street traffic s issues, "residents of the Anton 'Dakota ark area have asked if the second phase of ,r ',nton Park could he re- designed . to provide a direct connection to 121st A.veni e . ' The thought was that a new street connection might allow the closing of North Dakota Street to through traffic ENGINEERING COMMENTS: SUB 92 =05 SCSI, LZ /ED 1ARDS NIEMEYE t ,� �M1 - N ^ N Srni Tai «" i� uYv N � t'_« � L.. � ykjF la 1 " '� _'b � - ; 1 Y wX liC' F fF'' �:� �.�.N � -1i�Y `.4 After further investigation, . we do not recommend a direct connection to 121st for the following reasons: We cannot find a way to re- design the second phase without lots that face direct, ly onto .:he new street. Any options that we can find would require the removal of some of the existing homes In the first phase or would require a substantial reduction in the number of ' lots in the second phase. These options seem impracticable. :tf the new street cannot be designed without direct access from adjoining lots, then the new street will be no more satisfactory aS a collector street than is the existing North Dakota Stret . WEi would merely be shifting traffic problems from one street to another. Constructing a new intersection on 121st Avenue would create some potential traffic safety concerns on 121st (a major collector street) . Due to the locations of existing driveways along the east side of 121st, an extension of Anton Drive to 121st would not meet the intersection spacing requirements for the major collt. y.tor street For these reasons, we xecommend that the basic street al ,g iii ent approved in 1984 be retained, as proposed by the applicant. S. Sanitary Sewer: The applicant propcses to extend the existing public sanitary s y' t,. and provide sewer system located � S.W. S . W. North Dakota connections ror the newly created lots to the extended line. 4. Storm Drainage: 1 i pp �' ' s proposing ` to connect to the existing public ,t�. e a l�.cant is �' � storm sewer s1 stern located in S .W. North Dakota. St. handle appears that the ..xisting system has the capacity this development The applicant should be required to submit evidence that the existing system has the capacity to handle this development. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the C.ty has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No 91-.47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on- site water quality facii hies or fees in -lieu of their construction. - Construction of an on -site water quality � treatmen ' �` y, � �� the Site i s s.mal l compared toa the �develop er L� plan, and, h bedause of area for' the on-site facilitY would Preclude tea effective development. In addition, tequiring sur ace water quality facilities on small ENGIN ZERING COMt4E1NTS SUB 92 -08 SCHULZ /ED'WARDS- 1E a"C ►R 2 sites would result in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the City. Furthermore, the applica+, t has not proposed any such facilities and there are no.4atural depressions or other areas of ,this site that are particularly suitable for water quality facilities. Regional facilities, funde by fees in-lieu of construction of these facilities, would orovide the required treatment with i .,proved reliability less and 1�. a maintenance. Therefore the applicant should be pay constructing required to ay the fee in -lieu of construc g an on-site facilit ecommendatit:ns ALL CONDITIONS u'f-IALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FIh:AL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. The applicant shall be required to pay the fees as established under the guidelin:6 of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and ni-der No. 91-47. NOTE This is a two part fee which is paid di.W ferent'~. times. The first. portion is paid with the public improvements which is for that perti on of the development 'which increase the impervious area Within the public right -of -way. The second portion is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. Two (2) sei-s of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) Fig t s of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval. . An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improv went drawings The pl: n shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989 • As part of the public improvement plans the applicant Shall apply for and provide the necessary information to obtain a "Joint Permit" for erosion control. A grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed, contours and typical finished floor elevations on each lot, including elevations at 4 different corners of the floor plan tied to the top of curb elevations as ,shown on the public improvement plans • The applicant shall demonstrate that storrti drainage runoff can be discharged ntoe: the existing dr inageways without significantly impacting p taper i s downstream. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: SUI3 92ND SC OLZ /EDWARDS IE ER Full width street improvements!, inc1u ;dng traffic control devices, mailbox clustCrs, concrete sidewalks„ driveway aprons, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed within t'.e subdivision Construction _ of the proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the 'Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans, a street opening permit or construction compliance agreements has been executed., execution of a developers engineer agreement and payment of all permit fees. . The applicant shall make an appointment for a pre - construction meeting with the City of Tigard Engineering Department after approval of th public improvement plans but before starting work on the site. The applicant, the applicant's ergineer and co c shall be required to attend this meeting prior to ��tra�.�.cor s receiving the approved plans and permits. 10. Prior to the plat being recorded with Washington County the applicant shall provide a 100 percent performance ass,uran'je or letter of commitment. As an alternative the applicant may have the plat recorded the public im p rovements have been accepted by �heCt y of Tigard and has posted the appropriate Maintenance bond. 11. The Plat shall non access rew,erre strip along Sw121st Avenue frontage. e e IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWATE Off' THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1. SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agr,; ement A. Before City approval is certified on the final p1Pt, and pp plans ; y Cit. the Subdivider shall: the City, ed construction ans are � issued before approved r+ov 1. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which alp. regt red improjements and repairs shall be comp►,eted; and Include in the agreement provisions that if such work not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the Work and recover the fUll cost and expenses i,,roi the subdivider. ENOXNEERINC COMMENTS SUB 92 08 SCHULZ/EDWARDS r IE EYER IMIEMEMSIGEONEMMOSIEDozwiewav The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stges and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein 'stated in the contract. SECTION 18.160.180 Bond A. As required by Section 18.160.170, the sub'livider shall file with the agreement an assurance 4 ',:' performance supported by one of the following. 1. An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon; 2. A surety bond executed by a surety company i authorized to transact business in the State of Grego which remains in force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or 3, Cash. The subdivider shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement e stimaie, certified b" a registered civil engineer® to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance. Co ..,11e subdivider shall not cause term ination of nor al;lor egpiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City. SECTION 18.160 ,1.90 Filing and Recording ,A: Within 60 days of the C .ty review and approval, the applicant shall submit the final plat to the County for signatures of County officials as required by ORS Chapter 92 jecordi with the Count applicant i B > Upon final g � � the o1 scant sha.l p r pp• submit tc the City a mylar copy f the rea�ded final plat. SECTION 18.162.080 Final Plat Application Submission Requirements A. Three copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licens,d to practice in oregoh, and near data or narrative. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: SUB 92 B, The partition plat and data gar narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Pievised Statutes (CRS 92.05)1 Washington ounty, and by the City of T Lgard. • SECTION 18.162.110 Centerline Monumentation Monument BOX Requirements A. Centerline Monumen„ation for all Major Partitions 1. The center :Lines of all street and, ro4 way rights -of ^ way shall,, be Rionumented as prescribed in ORS t accepance of street 92.060(2) before city improvements under the following specifications: a ▪ Centerline monuments are required to have monument boxes conforming to City standards set t for those mox�,uments within the pavement area; ▪ The tops of all monument boxes shall be set to finished pavement grade 18.164.120 Utilities 1 u utility including, a y 1 limited to All u��.1i�� lines ct� c communication, ��:�, �].AC��xt.a��tg and scable television services !u � � �n es and related faeilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed aLotre ground, temporary utility service facilities duri:Og construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above. 18.164. 130 Cash or Bond Required 1. i'xiprovem,ents installed by the subdiv 4er sh�i1 be gua,ant~eed as to workmanship and material fo.r a pe year following acceptance by the Cite: ,. e��d of one ▪ such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City PIngineer. y Th: Cash or bond shall comply with the terms and Conditions of Section 18.160.180 ENGINEERING Coa4ENTS SUB 92 08 SCI- C' S /ED AD$ 0.01- 'X 77-777-' 18.1 4.150 istal1atii n:. PX` requisite /Perrnit Fee 1.: No land division itprOvements, saJflitary sewrers, ,Storm . sewers,, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other reguirenientS shall be un, .F;rtaken ,except after the plans therefor navy:) been appz.oved by the `City, permit fey paid and permit issued. ▪ 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance 2 • If wore is discontinued f r any reason,, it shall not be resumed untie. the City is notified. • 18.164.200 Engineer's Certification Required, • The land divider'10 engineer shall provide written cer .ification of a form provided by tie City that, .: ry workmanship and materials . are in all ,�a��ro�re��lerxts, ��uo�:kma � accord with current and standard engineering and constudtiofl practices, and are of high grade, prior the 'it acceptanc e. of the subdivi'sion's improvements or any Portion thereof for o eratieon, and maintenance Z:fN0. •� ....., . e � .. �» qq�� 1��yy �ryy- ��qq��++11 00 g,� �T X41 y;� ,�j �1tl�PJF.6.tciY1.� 1L °1L °„�'OiLV�ia ��L� �� V [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]