Loading...
CPA 17-84 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. . aK: l i i, DENSITY TRANSITION • :. .�. CPA l i--84..,�.eW � r�r � � CHAPTER 18.40.040 , r• w, . is 1'. 14' ,a. t e , y s • 7 k; p i• i t A i l'* .yip, y. • _gym,'` + 7 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 84-2‘ AN ORDINANCE .";&ENDING CHAPTER 18.40.040 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION, '' EXCLUDING LAND WHERE THE ACTUAL DENSITY IN THE ESTABLISHED AREA EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM DENSITY ALLOWED UNDER THE LAND USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION POR THE 4 ESTABLISHED AREA, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (CPA 17-84) WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council adopted the Community Deve'.opment Code in November 1983 including section 18.40 which sets forth a density transition requirement; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its Community ),Develoment Code periodicallytoimprove the operation and implementation of ,i that plan and code; and WHEREAS, the density transition policy limits development in some developing areas to a lower densitythan that intha abutting established area; and , WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held, a public hearing on May 8, 1984, to consider proposed changes to section 18.40 of the Community Development Code and voted to recommend to the City Council that section 18.40 be modified; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on May 14, 1984; and voted to modify section 18.40. w THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS Section 1. Section. 18.40 of the Tigard Community Development Code shall be a amended to add a new Section C as follows 1. C. bsection *18.40.u4O(A) abovewhere the ., SuIA shall. not apply. yabutting area exceeds: the actual density +n the established ' maximum density alloyed under - the Land' Use Plan Map designation fox° the established area: the de.ns=.ty_ transition still will not exceed 125 percent of the i; abutting established area density " , ORDINANCE 84-. , Page 1 i`. Section 2. Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of the peop?....i of the City of Tigard that this amendment be made with the least possible delay, an emergency is herby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor pro-tem. PASSED: By � �� � �,�.� vote of all Ccrrcil members present after'. being read by number and title only, this / (( day of , 1984. Deputy City Recorder - City of T .g ',rd` APPROVED: This ,if ( day of I`x�Q 1984. Mayor pro tem. . City of Tigard r dmj(0437P) ORDxMNC Page I 4 a' yj�. Agenda Item # 5.7 CPA 17-84 Tigard Planning Commission May 8, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff 4';.,16CAV1 SUBJECT: Density Transition .t� Secta♦on 18.40.040 of the Community Development Code setforth a formula for ert p yg. ped abuts an i calcLtlating a density transition whare a p ro been develo established residential zone. There has been one nstance where the density • in the established area exceeded the densityallowed in the established a plan designation and the developing property with the 1.25 densitytransition., could have developed at a lower density than the abutting established area. • STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation i amending Section 18.40.040 as follows: C. Subsection 18.40.040(A), above shallnot apply where) the density in the established area exceeds the maximum density allowed under the ,1 Land ti' e Plan Map designation for the established area. (0402P) •y... • 1 + � ... q: ..„ ;::tl .•1 AiWSu`r fy;dlFf' r 1NfM.. .+r r »u jy1 ♦ 4 • ,tom S 5.6 CPA 16-84 Amendment Decision Process .Associate planner Newton explained why an amended decision process would he helpful and recommended adding Section 18.3...275 Amended Decision Proce19s. £he Commission did need to determine how` many times someone could apply for an amended decision and whether there should be a fee. PUBLIC TESTIMONY e No one appeared to speak PUBLIC` REARING CLOSED COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION • The consensus of the Commission was for one time and that a minimal fee to cover cost of processing would be nece4. ry p r , m Discussion followed regarding other requirements. i Commissioner Peterson move g to forward staffts recommendation to City Council for approval adding under section B. "and accompanied by required fee. Under section C. add item number 6. "Any party who has commented in writing. Change section D. to read, 'The amended . to toone time. Change UDIt to "1 ° and change decision shah. be limiteda. g g "E" to "F''' { Commissioner Butler seconded. Motion carried unanimously by members , r. present. 5.7 CPA 17-84 Density Transition 31,4 Associate Planner Newton made staffts recommendation to amend Section. 18.40.040 of the Community Development Code to allow for cases when the density exceeds what is allowed in the established area. e Discussion followed regarding changes. Commissioner Owens left lO 25 P.M. PUBLIC TESTIMONY - No one appearedto speak PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED u. COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION O Commissioner moved to forward the folitwing to City Council with • recommendation of approval. C. Subsection 18.40.040 (A), above shali not apply where the actual density in the established area ei,xceeds the maximum density allowed under the Land Use Plan Map designation for the established area. The density trausition still will not exceed 1.25, that of the actual abutting established area density. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 8, 1584 Page 6 ,: r „� +�{,«,aM1. ,.o-,� ,•,n'.-ate w.ra w, ..,M.y +s:,' ._.. .. , .,. .,u a O Commissioner Peterson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimousl,Y by Commissioners present. :•., 5.8 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 11-84 EUGENE A. & EUGENE BRIMKEIT NPO # 3 Associate Planner Newton made staffs recommendation for approval of the Zone Change with conditions and forward the annexation to City Council PUBLIC TESTIMONY - No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED COMMISSIONER DISCUSSION AND ACTION e Assocriate Planner Newtcn stated that condition number one had been completed and was ri longer necessary. e Commissioner Fyre add Butler ware concerned about allowing t development with septi~ system. O Staff read letter from NPO # 3 stating they had no objections at this time. • Commissioner Peterson moved to recommend approval of the annexation and for approval of the Zone Change from RU 4 to R 4.5 sub jecct to the approval of the annexation by City Council with the following conditions. 1. A minor land partition application shall be filed with the City and approved prior to issuance of additional building permits on the property. 2. A metes and bounds legal description for the property to the center line of SW 121st shall be submitted prior to action by the Tigard City Council .fin the annexation. 3. Development will not be allowed on the property until such time as sewer is available to the property or psrtola.tion, tests indicates that there is adequate room for septic systems and the t•, applicant signs a nonrotnonstrance for sewer. Commission. Leverett seconded the nnoottion. Motion carried by majority vote,; Commissioner Butler voting no. 5.9 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 10--84 ROBERT GOODRICH NPO # 3 Associate Planner Newton made ,staffrs recommendation for approve: of the zone change with conditions and to forward annexation request to City Council. NPU COMMENTS - Staff read NPO # 3 letter stating they had no objections at this time. W, PUBLIC TESTIMONY No one appeal- speak. rs. ^'a , p PLANNING oaRmxSSION MINUTES May S 1954 Page 7 p: n ,.x 4 W . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN16-B4/AMENDMENT DECISION PROCESS AMENDMENT/CPA 1b-84/AME A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding Chapter 18.32 to allow the Planning Director to amend a decision after findings have been prepared in response to issuesthat are raised prior 4 to the appeal deadline, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTJCPA;. l7-84/DENSITY TRANSITION. A recommendation by the City of iTigard Planning Commission regarding the i . Density Transition section of the code, section 18.40.040, and conditions when application of this provision may not be required. a. Planning Director reported agenda items 2.10 through 2.14 were not heard at the Planning CommissionmeetingmeetinE. andrecommendedCouncil . open the pubiic hearig and continue to May 14th. , , p gthrough 2.14. I b. Public HearingOpened for agenda items 2.10 c. City Administrator noted Mrs. Clinton, 0865 S.W. View Ct. , Tigard, and .Yeraldine L. Ball representing DJB, Inc. , 11515 S.W. 91st, Tigard had signed up to speak on agenda items 2.10 and 2.11. , by by continue o �. Motion. Councilor Cook, seconded Councilor o 1, meeting. agenda items 2.10 through 2.14 to May 14, 9 Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council. ,,9.61 13. L.C.D.C. STATUS RESORT (1f q ' .,,,ci.- _,,,(t.,,,-Qii.. a. Planning Ditr..ctor reported on presentation to L.C.D.C. and stated Goal 2, Land Use ` P ye Spaces Scenic and I'l..ann�.n .and. Goal 5 Open * resolved:4 major �l,ic issues remain to be 111 g� , p , Historic Areas, and Natural f. �. dealt Housing, Item 1 .,.eso.l.,Aces - taken care of. Item #2 additional, manufactured have been with. Goal. 10, has. been � homes; Item 4, Housing Density, and Item. 5, Subsidized Housing are issues that need a solution. Staff reported they had direction how to handle the need assessment, and this would not affect the r', Comprehensive Plan. , b* Council and staff discussed the requirement regarding density of '' 10 units per acr ,: and how to achieve that goal. Staff must have a way to increas the density from 941 to 10 units per acre. p Staff suggested the following alternatives: .of 1. Up-zone some areas. y 2. Argue with L.C.D.C. ' 3. Zone some areas in downtown and triangle, first floor .>r ; rest, overhead, be used for residential., commercial All undeveloped land zoned medium high density; not p zoned 13-20 units per acre, be zoned 13-25 units per acre. This would equal 10 units per acre and solve thq density issue n c. Council discussed strategiesopinions and options ara .table. tem Schedkla' suggested Mayor p pro g5 ed staff work with Washington County .' to give us some ideas. Planningstaff noted items will haveto he Mage 7 COtINCtL TAPRIL 300 1984 • ,{ a. Public Hearing Opened Yd b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 23. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 14-84/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOCUMENT A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding various sections of Volumes I, II, and III of the comprehensive plan in response to issues raised in correopondence from Washington County, the Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland, Oregon Legal Servi Corporation, The Department of Environmental Quality, The Oregon State Housing Division, 1,000 Friends of Oregon, Metro and the Land Conservation and. Development Commission Staff. a. Public Hearing Opened b. Motion by Councilor Cook, s=::conded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. ..` Approved by to animouz vote of Council present. 24. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 15-84/SETBACKS IN THE CG AND CP ZONES A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding the required setbacks in the General Commercial (CG) a a.d Commercial Professional (CP) zones a. Public Hearing Opened ,P. fi b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Counetilor Brian tc continue to April 30, 1984. • Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A. 'ENDMENr/CPA 16-84/A-84/AMENDMENT' DECISION PROCESS A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding Chapter 18.32 to allow the Planning Director to amend a decision after findings have licea prepared in response to issues that are raised prior to the appeal deadline a. Public Hearing, Opened b Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. + # Approved by unanimous vot'e of Council present. 26. C OMPREHENS1' 8PLAN A 1EN1)ME,N*. /CPA 17. 4/1,)ENSE►ry TANS TIO t A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding the Density Transition section of she code, section 18.40.040, and 4"', conditions when application of this provision may not be require :: a. Public Hearing Opened Page 11 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 23, 198 R . b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 27. L.C.D.C. STATUS REPORT a. Planning Director distributed i;ems for study and noted this issue would be presented at a later date. 28. APPROVE r.OUNCIL MINUTES 4-9-84 a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 29. ACCEPT DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS a. Councilor Scott requested additional information from the Director of Public Works regarding his monthly report. Councilors Scot:, Pad Scheckla questioned the Director of Planning & Development regarding his report. b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve. .., Approved by unanimoo$, vote of Council present. 30. RESOLUTION NO. 84-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENT TO THE TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COM1IT:EE. (Mr. Robert Williams) ,�. a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve«' Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 31. RESOLUTION NO. 84-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO THE TIGARD PARK AND RECREATION ��.'. BOARD. (Mr. Steve Newman and Mr. Steve Slabaugb) a. Motion by Councilor Cook, second;.d by Councilor Brianto approve. ve» Approved, by unanimous vote of Council present. 4° ' 32. RESOLUTION NO. 84 2S �{ U C y}�{ CITY • RESOLUTION Y � RESOLUTION Fye., CITY COUNCIL. or Tat OF, i,•_•,y i. .. A I�t.r V,V��V'T��N.... V� THE ,:-. TICARD OREGON, ESTABLISHING A CIVIC CENTER PROJECT ADVISOR` COMMITTEE. (7 member board) a. Motion by Councilor Cook., seconded by Councilor Brian to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. °► 3 . ACCEPT SLOPE EASEMENT ON BONITA ROAD - Wallace J. Brosseau S700,00 AND AWARD BID FOR S5,900' TO RUTAN CONSTRUCTION POR REPAIR WORK Motion by 'Councilor Cook, seconded by Council +' Brian to approve. 4 4, Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 12 - COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 3, 1984 "!p. '!rt rY i �S • .• ' _4 X y. - . 1 , y w • u ., .,oi , ,M1��yq ry • �y F +YF4 TIMES PUBL'I H II\IG COMPANY Legal • P.O BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice , BEAVERTON.OREGON 87075 *. Legal Notice Advertising v • 0 Tearsheet Notice ei f , City of Tigard OF Ti f?D . s •PO Box 23397 " 0 Duplicate Affidavit Tigard, OR 97223 a AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION b 148 gTATE OF OREGON, 0"4 ale _ 4. ' z� rr )SS , o.t- . f 31JNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) �.Q 0 ,1 �' I Susan P nk1y3' .. . . C-8—g..,4-' - Y _ .0. :*4, ... o a. being first duly sworn, depose and say that I aril the Advertising 1% _ ..- a zk, .• Director,or his principal clerk, of the Tigard Times o, 4,11 o. =: ? ; :,- a newspaper ofgeneral circu.i }!on as defined in ORS 193,010 - �'_ t °� H • a n ,� z G4)"'° 4 c� and 193.020; published atTigard in the aforesaid countyand state; that the1 P-43 S 08 *+* `" Public Hearing gg -�. -.s a. �, qv-41'.4%a= v-4 -= , ; a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was published in the I"iii yrs V,. b . ,R -g entire issue of said newspaper for 1 successive andcal i., it...- t. oa . 4 �` ,et1i e 1 consecutive in the following issues; ��� � �-=�`��� � ,�•.�� � *�� P 1:4 1 April 5, 198 o$ a ,-..--3,15.111..., ; •-r klii -V V I -CO-7-'. i d, '.'. . =-0....912 .-9:411,1,, 1. ' , moiE G � � `� as s -' .. y v 6 o43,vi 42 t-, ► Wil!Irk`. , ' , V,PA' , '--:-4.:8 a a �. _ Z. 0 _a.. ..'It _A!'..�.../ c)i 5-c,..w•- ,6 tib+ Ag' c (_ al •.. �' i. „,„— 1.f Subscribed and -horn to before me`thi ` • 10, 198it". i*Ji:47-„,.-T) if!, ,104....-, y. o G`,74.2,,..„,=4",11:11.1�. ss. A _ .4 01-E--6,-.. .:,--111 5,f:--- o/it) t '0E. 111 i4V 2 tx-aPIR,1 i-F4 w -+a sa =- fig: Bra g' N-s1 = F ' ° et>4 2 a;-4. i,, • * V. '�"t 1 g. ► moi °5 Notary Public for Oregon `e 9 `1` 11. y .+ s ' 'c` MY Commission Ex ' - 3/16/87 .a z� c -4t1t� -4.-a a � �� AFFDAV9� a Q a' Cr a fr► f ..