CPA 3-83 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
r• a
,.7 >n +. "�.C -. a .,:.,{.r a i,_ �,.is t r,.w•r�a,h,_,.G;:.1 s,i. GM.: a -`m'zV,'a.(ul i.. ���
CPA QQ § �+tyt
Tigard'e Urban Planning Area Agreerrient' �tai � V4
�,.
,.Ikr ..�, r ..a:n w, d:�+,.rc. wt.. .,I..k. ,--risu,....lt„rd�+,at-'a�•..I.....4....ae::M.t m.�t:-.�.e.µ .��.;,�mlt..�.«_«:.'a,...4h1,a.a..la w.h.,-..w� ..;4_,...,,a 'x'11
I I r
i r I 1
I I
� I
' I
I I'
f I
I i
I I I
w I i
; I I
•�k, I I f{ I.I.I
I I
I I
r i 1
I I
I I
.. I
IIla'
6'
I c
. L
t k
t I 9
• ' � I I
f I
I + I f
1 I
I ))
CITY OF TIGARD
RESOLUTION NO. 184- "
•
A RESOLUTIUN` REACTIVATING AND CLARIFYING THE URBAN rLANNING AREA AGREEMENT , •
BETWEEN, THE CITY 'OF TIGARD A1D WASHINGTON COUNTY.
• WHEREAS;, the City of Tigard and Washington Coupnty agreed'' to an Urban •
Planning Area Agreement (UPAA.) which was adopted by both governmental bodies j •
• in 3983;' and
84
and was not extended bythe
arl
�3k1EREAS, the UPAA lapsed on January 1, `� x ,.
• two
i'•x tcs; and
WHEREAS, al prior agreement executed in 1980 was reactivated on January 1.,
•
g
1984,. whicis unsatisfactory to both parties as it is ,inconsistent with the
s' City and County Comprehensive Plans, specifically relative to transportation
issues; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the. City and County to establish al •
pvocess to resolve transportation inconsistencies between the City and, County
Plfan�; and
WHEREAS, it appears to be in thebest interests of the City. and County to
?• 'establish temporary design, standards for the planned connection of S.W. Murray
Blvd. and S.W. Gaarde. Street to be applied until such, time as the City and
County `Transportation Plans are consistent with one another.,
••,` NOW, TREEtEFOH,E BE IT RESOLVED:
•
-. Urban Planning Area Agreements,
f., 1. The Tigard C�ashxngtr�n County adopted
as Ordinance No. ' 83-33, ishereby reactivated arid ratified through
June 30, 1985 by the City in accordance with the
provisitrn of Section
VI of said Agreement which allows it to be extended; and that this
Agreement shall supercede all earlier Urban Planning Area Agreements '
between the City and the County; and;
2
. The City agrees tothe foli.ori.ng process to resolve, transportation
inconsistencies between the City and, County'Comprehensive Plans
. METRO Southriest�
Upon receipt of the draftCorridor Study, the
City and the County designate an 11 equal number of"'
a..pro ri.ate,,staff perso.tihe.l to meet andprepare a joint report
P
pp p.
a hohresents'al cottmitte.t recommendation ons
(1)
l�. Road
1
u1
am o d
o� r
, , classification
f 'nct��na
`e u lI
+an in.direat. '.onnetttion or
(.2) T1�►e� need and location of
' connections, between. Murray Blvd /Seho11s Ferry Road and
det
t et W; and
..aa r ', I
G r 9
. I
B. Within 'months of' the receipt o the draft South.West, Corrido
•
i
I • Study) the I .3ont coimittee shallreport its findings to the
ard City Council anlBoard Oonty Coststissioners for
I I
Washing"tori Cou�tity for' adoption of. a iutual agreem�e�.t on the
resolution of the ,transportation issues1 and:
„,.., ,„
.r
•
• ..._ 1.
• ��• 3. The city hereby establishes the following temporary y design guidelines
for any segments of the planned Hurray Blvd. and S.W. Gaarde Streetl
connection between the vicinity of 135th/Walnut and 12l/•Gaarde ,
intersections that may be proposed 'prior to the implementation of [2]
above:
II I
11
I; I
I ,
•
A. Right-of-wayht-of-way 'shall be 60 feet
r
I ; , ,
L
B. Improvement widths shall:be 40 I
prI feet; ;
C. There shall be no "Tr' intersection or other design features' that
•
will impede the function of the street as a minor collector, I
D. I Driveway access 1 shall be limited, but not prohibited; I
' I E. The road shall be constructed according to City structural
I
•
standards. I
;
I
F. Thecurve radius will be a minimum of 350 feet.; ,.
I I II
I I I
III
. .. I
The need to modify ' the preceeding
standards shallbe SII:rerzewed by, t e
II
11
committee established in 112] above, and 1 I
YI I
I
4. The City hereby r
ea f f xrmrs it s strong g support for
the inclusion of the'
'
I I I I I proposed westerly by-pass in the METRO Regional
ioI nal
T
ransI portatI
ionlP
lan..
• 5. The County agrees' to support the City at Tigar is LCDC earin s.
,II
1 I
'I
I l 84.
f
9
dayo I
� • I
PASSED: This �r� I
I I I
• I 1 I,
I i I
n I
Mayor pro tem --- ,City of Tigard
• •rI I I
I I
• I I I
I I
II ,
Ir
k II L
I I
I I
w I
I I
I I I
Deputy CityEecorder - CityofTigard
I
I I
I I _
IL I
I_ I
• � � I I
II
I I
' I
rl I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
II
`
,III
• I I I I
I I
I .
• I I ,
it I
I I I I
I I r
I L.
.C.
I .r
�:
I II
/ON 140w
IC 0407p)
(•
• •� .. � ... .,.• ,r . .. ••.I., - • .. ,,: as I• Jk,..c..� wlu.�, .Lol .IwuH w w..;lk
iw •
I I II
is
Director of Public Works reportedted that the utilities bei:ng
••, ' assessed were only those needed for, the road developcient. These
' utility lines are being 'put in only to the extent that are needed ,o,
i
for the road.. Other utilities can be put lin as the properties' n'
This) is' beingincluded in they I
the arealdevelop.ILID so as to
',•,
protect the street from being cut after itis linplace.
f
ORDINANCE NO. 84-18 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ASSESSMENT FORMULA
FOR THE DARTMOUTH EXTENSION STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. .
• 40, CREATED PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO 84-17.
,.• g. Motson byCouncilor Brian, seconded by
Councilor Cook to adopt.
1 Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
•
FINANCE DIRECTOR LEFT: 9:15 P.I .
7. 1'
UPAA AGREEMENT [;.'
I
' I
a. Director of, Planning & Development stated that unless this '
agreement, is passed, Council may not be able to act on the Park
Place Appeal issue. At the last meeting, Council directed staff
to work outtheproblems r
oblems and coordinate with Washington County.
Director gave history of issues and stated that there are 5
p ydesign. guidelines for the Murray'LBlvd. extension. Metro ;
nes
•
more information.deli
temporary u
'zs currently; doing a SWI Corridor Study to supply'
which is needed before, a final decision should be made on this
issuer •,
• I I
City. Administrator' stated that the resolution reactivating' and
clarifying the t PAA only notes the corridor study, a decision does
not need to be made now as to the extensionor whether an
extension would be direct or indirect.
b. Rick baniels, Director of Planning & Tratsportation with
un rt
Washington County, encouraged the ' adoptiot of the. UPAA so that
Tigard could gain approval for its' comprehensive plan with LCDC.
c. Both, Bledsoe, 11800. SW Walnut, NPO #.3 Chairman, stated that the
UPAA should, specify a 350' curve radius for streets and that it
should be approved " Appeal M has been
I after the Park. x. P ,4ce. A eal
.'., rendered. :.
n,iels stated that a 700k'' curve 'radius' was 'I not press:
d: Rick Tia z.b le,' in
the Park Place. area anyway
I II
. e». �.e
��. Fain, Irepresenting, Century Propertiesl the developer tor I
Park Place,;' stated the Tissueof the curve 'rad.ius was aoademit" in
that the area cannot sustain a 700' °radius.
Ir I
�
I
f. FiBOhUT
ION NO. 84-34 A RESOLUTION ;REACrIVAT N(1 l AND t'LAR FYINGI TUE I
UREAN p'LANNINCAREA ACREEMENT BETWEEN T� CITY ''(r ',TtCARD ANS
I
WAStNCTOt'1 COUNT'S
II
I I II II jI I I I
I. I
�I I
� I I
tt cy or Cook to Is rOV'e.
d '� Cot�ncxl
`� �lor r��n seconded Pp
Iou c 8
t�
b n
II I
g. �� � s y
I I"
II
Pa e' I 5 C�U�C�I M1I t!TE5APRIG � , i 4 I
.
II
1 ,
I I ,
II I
h. I Motion by'
Councilor Brian seconded bY Councilor Cook to amend the ..
resolution as follows (additions are underlined) : ,.
needlocation of' n indirectconnection or
A.� ITheand loc ori, a
2
2
connections between Murray IBlvd4/Sch.olls Ferry Road and Gaarde
Street/99W and " is
F. The curve radius, will be a minimum of 350 feet." ,
Motion to amend Resolution No. 84-34 was approved bya 3-1 4y
pp
majority vote of Council' presentr, Councilor Scott voting nay.
. I
I
Motion to approve Resolution No. 84-34 as amended was, approved by
�
PF
3-I majority vote of Council present. 'Councilor Scott voting nay.
i I
1 I I
i I ,
i I
I I
I I
I I
I 1 I I 1
•I
� I
I � I
I I
_ I
i II I I
( I
is
n I 1
I I
I i
I ,
i r i
, � I
, I
i I
I I
J I
SII t
I i; I I
I I
I , •t
(i
I i fl,
N
�
IJI1
il�
, I 1
....ts*.,,,,,,.7 ts t,,,,,,..
;I I
TICIIYOF ,
I I
1NASHINGTC)N cOUNTY,OREGON
I I I
June 14 1983
I II
• I I I
I I
I I
I I ,
I ' I
• � I I 1
Unified SewerageAgency
I I I
g II
C/O illi. GaryKramer
I I
1Jashingtan County Courthouse
1il1sbaoro, Oregon
Ori on 97123 .�
, .
�
(2
RE: Ta aid s Urban Planning Area I r eent
L I
Dear Mr. Kramer,
• I I
I I
I I
During dig rd9
sI negotiations with Washington County to finalize
ze an Urban
I I
v Planning Area Agreement (UPAA), the City indicated its interest in reaching an
��• agreement ee
ment mit
h
D.S.A. c
onceanng Planningg
County
r
ount asuggested to the
cit that the� �y waythat USA could beobligated concerning planning matters
I was b� executing individual agreement. The attached is a copy of the
d CAty�s proposed language for this agreement which is referenced in the draft
UPS,. The DPL9,, �n section ��, specifies that the agreement shall be in
II
effect until January1, 1983, chileoutstanding issues are resolved,
includingadoption of the attached agreement
, «
,' certain
� • I pby the Board of Director of USA.
'
• � I
eti ' �
8►���d appreciate Your attentionenta Yt� this matter.b All inquires
concerning g .
. ,
II the draft agreeataent should be directed to me.l'
•
I I
:r Sincerely,
s
II II I I
I I
�. I a an
lias� �nh
I , _ II II
bireetor of planning and DeVelopment
I I
RI
I I I
• I I I I
I I
I i
cc. Rih'1ard.,,DanielI
I I
I I
Wiliii./dtrtj 0(C76P 6M A
,
I I
I I
d
II G
I I
C I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
12755 S.kl,ASN PA 13OX 23397 TidAFib O
-,-.--
I I iI r I
„i .,�. ..;.�, nw,w..,.nwbr«w•w.w.,�.�....w•xe+'+•r�..w.m..w.,w .l,.
:. Y t d � .' � -.....•w.�w>uu+mw ••-�' � .,way
. a r --.....r .r ....... ....... .w... ..... a u., .. .ur,,, ,.....
I ({
6/9/83
I
I I':
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY, WASHINGTON
1 . COUNTY AND CITY OF ZxGARD AGREEMENT
i
I I 1
I I
I I
I I1HIS AGREEMENT, made and en�ex
edIin
to It
s
:.r. da
y of
Countybybetween
h • theUNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OWASHINGTON
1,1 COUNTY, a
SevceDstrxctformed under ORS Chapter 451, hereinafter
ei t� a
' "AGENCY" and I the CITY OF` TIGARD, a municipal corporation of the State of 1
Oregon,. hereinafter Icalled "CITY". '
I I
W` I ,INES SIET 'H:
I I WHEREAS, ORS 190.010provides that units of local governmentss may enter into
I
agreements for the peri.ormance of any or all functions (land activities 1that, a II
party to the agreement, its officers or agents, have the authority to 'perform;
and
I I'
II
.•: 'WHEREAS, IState-wide ,Planningning Goal No. 2 1(Land Use F
lanring) requires that,
' citycountystate and federal l agecy and special district plans and actions
n
be consistent with the comprehensive' plans of cities and counties; and ,
WHEREAS, ORS 197.185 provides a method for coordination, oprograms affecting
land use of special districts; and;
parties are amenable - entering, into 'an agreement under the
WliE�tEA5� the , to
II
• terms and conditions set: forth herein;
I NOW, THEREFORE, , IT IS,AGREED as follows
r
CITY limits1 and CITY s
`within I
1. AGENCY shall undertake its actions
Active PlanningAreal in accordance with CITY°s C2mprehensive Plan.
I I
2. AGENCY shall prohibit the connet+tion of meat development within CITY"'sl 1 j I
Active Planning Area to its sewer system !'facilities unless CITY gives I I
prior written approval. 111 `
II
I 3. CITY will CKF
e
atewith
AGENCYin its functions
of providing,
I, I
'
I
I r
sanitary sewer fazl�.txes'
:�.. 11,
W I
4. Th�s
',Agreement shall continue until
theo parties
mutually a
r
ee to
I I
11 terminate this agreement.''
1
I 'I
I II
I I
w
. rtes have I executecd this Agreement on Ithe date set
'IN WITNESS WHI�t�EOI' the parties
•
under their s ignatures ,
it
1 I
CITYI �� TCuAD 1
BOikl:ID Oh D
RECTORS, tiNIVIEb SEWERAGE
IAGENCY 'WAStlItGTON COUNTY 1,1
II
• , I 1 I
, II •
I I,
ayccr Chairman
II I
City Recorder keoordin Secretary
� I
I II
I '
Date
Dat
(0556A)
M
a "' y • ..