The URL can be used to link to this page

CPA 18-83 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. •,,!+,.wr�r±�^N^rMrmr-nw3 n�rtL..xwN,i'ar..�+T^.rv.tin.YwA...+.tmm�«.+.—wrru ..n:,�+4e .- .. '.�,i� :: 1 1 I W.++«+t�,.m r It,IM« -r e.aL,n.N .wWMmY+..�ALry�rr4«H+.V-A.`fw.,-.reA,.:F•mMn�,w +r.IGnr,r�.r.A..r�rn4..rM %✓,..+.v.l,�e tt m✓N+ h..ia.,. 7L1SJ � r. , (�y 18-.83 iY t! i .. . , .,rf'a-- 151 :330 1( :Q & 251 43 101 135/St1is Fete ' , , ht,',.,14-83 & 2A283 � 1/ F }`' I t wqGaa:scu..xf«L.w.,u.s�r«rti.»�.Uw,.,r,..».,..,,,;2Er,l,'�c,a.r,�.:r.„cr..r,,.L-;�,;.«...r,,..,�uP�i,.ir.. .r.:l_.+«..a,,,Mr;.. M. h t , t , , y, r. fr f ! , f gr i f f P , ' ».,I' .�ir..., ,:t'': 'rf,. ' Y a.kla'rs.....,d ,. ,,,..,.'„,,,,,,....,,,..,„-',..:,,,,,,•,,.oiwA" "!�� I 1 yy��11 �pyr(�p� r w, a. i,►j,a! L Irt ()r der to Cutnp y S't��tet�ren t EXH LE3IT ti A-2 CITY ()f�' IIGARU ORDINANCE NO. 84- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP (CPA 1-84 WALNUT ISLAND) AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCX. • WHEREAS, during the review by affected jurisdictions of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan submitted for acknowledgment by LCDC, Washington County found an area within the City`s Urban Growth Boundary with no Land Use Designations; anis WHEREAS, the area is within the City of Tigard's Planning Area; and WHEREAS, LCDC reL;.tikres all Land to have 'a Land Use Plan Designation; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on March 6., 1984; and WHEREAS) the Planning Commission' has made certain recoaunendations to the City xr Council; and ti , � I i d WHEREAS after considering the c' C mmLss .on an , ' r�uunents '; of the Planning o z.ndzvidtxal citizens) the form setal believes that the Comprehensive Plan Hap thisthein f� �� hereto and by I�.t A attached- y should be amended in forth Exhibit reference; made' a part hereof., �� IdOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGAR:D ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:' ' - Section 1: The City Countiladopis findings in this case as follows: y f, d. low dens.1,ty , 1. The property is surrounded by land designated residential. 2. The p�o osalconfort'ls to existing tisting Camgreherisive. Plan policies and ze)nirtg code requirements. I Sec tion t.. amends the Comprehensive ive flan as , ,'therefor � �. The t��t.. Goy nc�l e i I , 4asliin tan County Tax Hap 2S1 4 °lots 400 :kOCI5011 502 and 505' to the low ' density reszdetitial plan dst,gnatian, in the forth set forth in the Exhibit t1A" attached hereto and, by this re ferend°e t' ' triake a 'part hereof,, ORDINANCE No 84 ri { I I Sect ift 3: In order comms;ply With requirt!ti)ent. ,)t LCL)&, tha ;ill lrid within th City's Urb,in tloaundary be given a land Use Plan designation, an emergency Is declarea and this Comprehensive Plan Amendment shall become of Sect i.ve upon its passage. PASSED: By. vote of all Council members present, after being read by number and title only this 3,a day of fj; ,•r, 1 , 1984. • 1 + !y Deputy Recorder City, .f Tigard APPROVED: By the Hayor, this 'Jj day of 'if t.., 1.984. Pro Tern Hayor City of Tigard ORD tNANCE. .NO. 84- II f a 0a1),LANt,E NO., 4 I ('O402P) , • I i I I ` to-, 1 , . PEC (5w , JJ�il' � q 1r ( : a AP FRSEE MAP S 2S ! 48n I I, BC .i. • 1 I i • n'11. I �{ �Q ?UQ b ` ` I Il,39.tc" I 1 a— 160° OA,a. \ \. 1 1, II i 1 I I 1 I � I I j 1 ' 1 1 � I I I 1 � � I I 1 CAT1O w C x LO A�PA O X. k11d N s 'D E TF r yRO O E. . ' f e \ i''' AVE 3 ,j I w 5 00 I I,TS•G LO2. !sCi4c. 1 , 5 d3 ':ro.cta i I 1 111 4 0 t7j1 I I 11 14 t?;. ,^^'11)) • t.20'0 I ��O.Y I I�� '. la._.r, • � I � 1 T�W r !'. I 1 ' 3CAC. " a \ 1 11 ' 11 11 I ,I I' I I. tr II 1 I 1 11 1 I I 1 . I u. \ I L 1 I , I + I, • ,+��i,��,\]�� {{ , 0 ,stil{i'A C, ,,, t.t9' it,t ., 1 J� rr.., ,.. 4,ur,,,.. gym.» ;«w... 1.;,N,a.a.�a..r, ,u� ,+��+++.»�.,.a,:,:a", ��Y rW..w,.,w., w--� .�w.,:+w •+",« ar,,,+...4ulw�.. w. .aw...►.ae,..;.,.r" . 11 U r.Ja. t .. .. .t.!. !i: .l.r +} ,;. w:.k.JiFGw' Ya.r•Yl3:il Y C+,. K Y i,M...w.uwa,. 4e ' . ;_.`ti i . ..a.t ' I ii,„)1, T I G A R;D C I T Y C O• U N , I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES I• MARCH 12 L,9 4, 1984 71:30 P.M. 1`. ROLL''CALL: Present Mayor I:WilVbur Bishop; Councilors: Tom Brian John � i Cook, Kenneth Scheckla,' and Ima. Scott,; City Staff: Frank:, 'Currie Director ofi Public Works; Bob Jean, Cit ".1:: Adminis t at Bill. M r o o a D I �„,.',:11,' l r; I nah n, irector, of Planna.ng St : , l II Deve,lopmentl; Tim, `Ramis (arriving ,Iat 10:00' "P.M.), Adrianne ' ' `Brockman, and ,:Ste. .re 'Crew, Legal1'Counsel; and Loreen '”Wilson, I,` I : Deputy City ,,Recorder. I :` 2. CALL TQ ',STAFF ',AND' COUNCL FOI R. NON-- GENDA I TE M S I I is : i .• 'I l 'aCity Administrator stated there were new h�ndouts for a'agenda item , `*- IO •&.",•11."'C',',, Also he 'noted' that CouncilorI Scheckla ,had,,,,requested I ' that' items '11.:3 and 11.4 be pulled ;'from Consent Agenda for further; ,1 discussion. • He ' also reminded Council; of, the Washington County Public Officials Caucus meeting . Thursday,,,``evenirn, at King City.'` l3 Executi,ve Session, will not be for 'lator relationsbut Item � I ; under ORS (1."):(1-1),192.660four ron consideati ,of pending litigation• 1 • S �'1 3 VISITOR'S S' R, AGENDA. 2 Minutes or Less ease� a } I I E I I � a.` Lee Cu i a nn n `h m owne of r er r � t at I 2 �W F 2 8 Sc I � �' • g 3 p P y 1 5 hops er • I oad. J i ' requested ', Council `waive fee and filing requirements for :,a,', CPA ; 3 review ,by the City,' for his property• He noted that' he was ,nevaer '` I ','t i,H,'''',, :' ,,'H,', ,1, , : ,,' ',,,,,' , ,''adVised; of 'a change in the Plan on his property since he 'was ;lout' 1 of ' town and he requested ` that itl be returned to the previous designation of C-P I I I s , � I �� : � ° I ;. `b• director of Planning & DeveloFment suPp©rted therequest and stated Planning` Commission could hear this item on 4/9/84. I: ` c. Mo tiofi by Councilor' Brian, seconded. by Ccunc ii,or Cook to :allow,'I the application` for'; a CPA with' a waiver of the fee and t .aie frame. • 1 ` Y• A roved unanimous vote ofl' Counc Ph • by ,^4. present. 4. ORDINANCE NO4;,, 34-O6 AN ORDINANCE .AMENDING :TMC SECTION ::,;2.,01+,,,O,20) CITY I r ii\DMINISTRATO R� AN D,' SECTION 24.6.02.�� P�rNICIP AL . CRT T3DGEa ADD GPROVISIONS FOR, IHEA O, NMENT ' G 11 Ari�D' REMOVAL OF THE 'CZTYATTORNEY AND a'lIE RECORDER I ,' T'' THE'';f TG'A IRD MUIN:ICIPP`PAL CODE AND. DECTARINcl AN.''' 1 MERGENOY,^ i Ir • I � ' I I , F a. Motion by Councilor: Coo ) secondedby Councilor'Erian to ado,pt,i, 4 Sthrovad by 3 2 tmajority vote of unc.x present. Councilors i eckia and Stott voting nays F, 0 i 5. II' ORDINANCE NO, '84-05 Ail ,QRD,INANCE AbbPTING .FINDINGS: AND UPHOLDING "T:IE' t ':, i PLANNING !COMMISSION'SI :APPtWVAL OF A COMPTt,EHENSIVE ,r I H.PLAN MA AMENI�M.ENT , .ANS ` ONTNO I DISTRICT,.• MAP 1. , yy.� '.AMI�ND�IE�t � i : i � , . �}y�' y`, ,�j{y yyy '�/y��.Ij"� ��y{ �j�y�y�Iy( [�Y��.�Ni�; �,.�PA 'aL '4•, ` � '-ff"h� ��• .4:f� 4T.;h!I:��'iw•4/ � .'��• I I DE pt I r• � A� � A ME GENCY� V'p ,. — r ,.. tli. „.A: •Uv„.a._I...n:..II ,x,r 1.:'..I L ,,.,..6'„i...i.wa'-x^r J..c:>.... ,.....-., I:.F..i,, - , .:.:..,'1.`7.. ,{. , ✓`ice- 3.....` ..!:I:r ..a.., i q ;r • ' ...w..7,..«'..,.".+..,,;.a,•.ry K,."..-';. ,.,. rx J! .il y�''." „'Jy:: r.4.NY'M!i�'�w„ w,:. 'i ,E a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. v ORDINANCE NO. 84-09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 18.32.090 APPROVAL AUTHORITY RESPONSIBILITIES, 18.32.330 TRANSCRIPTS I AND 18.130 CONDITIONAL USES OF THE TIG$ARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND DECLARING AN ' EMERGENCY. a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to adopt. . Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 7. ORDINANC"' NO. 84-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TRE DEFINITION OF LOCAL , IMPROVEMENT, PROVIDING FOR THE DEFINITION OF A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT AND SETTING FORTH THE COSTS AND ' 'EXPENSES WHICH MAX BE ASSESSED AGAINST PROPERTY AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to adopt. I I Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. H RECESS COUNCIL MEETING: 7:55 P.M. I '8. I TURA. BUSINESS MEETING 3' I ROLLAgency Pre sent. Age Ic � ��ebers.�' W�1 � r Bishop, p, Tom Brian,ian, ; • John Cook, Cenneth rrchecRla, and Ima Scott; CityStaffs Frank Currie, Director of Public Works; Bob 'Jean, Cit;r Administrator; Bill 'Monahan; Director of Planning & Development; Steve Crew, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson,...Deputy City Recorder. ; I 8.2 RESOLUTION NO. 84-O1TI A RESOLUTION ADJUSTING THE TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY `° BUDGET AND RECOGNIZING REVENUE. ' FISCAL TEAR 1983-84 I I Motion by',Agency Member Brian, seconded by Agency member Cook, to ' I r approve.' ' Approved by unanimous vote of Agency'members present. $..3 ; ACCEPTANCE OF BUDGET C0IMM S TE 1983-84 T E ' .. • 4 BCIDGET RECOMMENDATION I a ' Motion by Agenc> • miember Cook.,. seconded ''by Agency 'member Brian to adepts Approved by unanimous vote 'of Agency taembers present. 8.4 A.D3OURNMENT: 8:03 tECONVENE:'COUNCIL, MEETING: 8:05 P.M. 9K . ORDINANCE NOW ,84-11 �;Nr i�,��D INANCG AI►iEND t ANG 'SECTION 5,t)4.010 (�,) Olt THE; " TiGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, Pag rCO MINUTES LARCH, 1,2,3, 19,484 • / '--"'l '' 4 ,YfRaiFl ( ' c 5 ° 1, Ii CITY OF TIGARD OREGON" i11 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 1 Match AGENDA ITEM IF: L AGENDA OF: � 12, 1984 , _ March 2, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: Public; Hearing held ;,' DATE SUBMITTED: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Russ Krueger reb, 2;7, 1984 before Cit y Council � I CPA 18-83 and, ZC 14-83 ' REQUESTED BY: Russ Krueger E I i DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: , L � r+ I ' INFORMATION SUMMARY I i At the City Councilmeeting of February 1984, a public hearing was held on the proposed Comprehensive 'Plan amendment and zone 'change. No one appeared 1 to speak. The `Council voted to direct staff to prepare, an ordinance approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change. The ordinance, map and legal description are attached, II , I I I � I I II I 1 I � , I I . I 1 I i I I i I I t I I I I I I I 1 1 ' I I I I i = C7L"I�1�1R'Ci'i'�.�.'{Lr7�L"a,�[1rKfR iL�i"76�C'��Y."L.�tC�C'.�.SS'#C SItT I I I rii ERNATIVES CONSIDEREb � � I � 7.fit; I I r II , I' I , I I w I I Sir,,tr4rtir;wcnKrexrisarenc=mirl=rei'ematc*wMcsiwsartfeicYwss$wi.,atidan '.,` = I' r Et'GGEETSDACTIO I _ I . City Coundil approval � the or �na��e a ,s UD � s� d s I I §> I `r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 84- O AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION"S: ,' APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT AND ZONING DISTRICT MAP AMENDMENT (CPA 18-83 AND ZC 14-83 KRUEGER) AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment and a Zoning District amendment request for the property owned by L�Crueger at public hearingon February 7, 1984; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was heldbefore the City Council on Febrtaary 27, 1984; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City C n,a �► upheldh 1d the decision ision of the Planning Comm`,ssion after considering the comments of the Planning Commission and individual citizens, and voted to approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment as prop')sed and the Zoning District Map' amendment as proposed. ' h NOW THEREFORE I THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The City Council adopts findings in this case as follows: 1. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and Zone Change conform to , the applicable planning po_licies. 2. The proposed use meets the locational criteria established in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Section 2: The City Council, therefore, upholds the ' Planning Commission's " s approval' of the Comprehensive Planamendmentl. and Zoning District, Map amendment as proposed and set forth on the attached E'xhibi,t Section 8» Inasmuth asI it is necessary to revise City Comprehensive nsive Plan 'Maps to allow development in a timely manner, an emergency is declared exist this ordinance shallbecome. fective uponon tPassage by the Council and approval by theMayor. PASSED: E. y ��1�c"��r vote of all Council '_members. present, after_ , only thea )' `T day ;` being read by number and title of ' ! # Deputy Recorder - City of Tigard T X.PPRCY�`E1 t fly the Mayor, this . day o �; �,,. � I , II I y i Mayor — of Tigard ORDINANCE Nth. 84, (EA1 :i)m 01 P /r ( y ' I 7 . .. .,..,•.,.»tea».....,,,.:» .. .ti.�.u...w.. _. I • E,BANCROFT. A&ii;DCII'il'ES, S N C 0 R P O R A T E D A, , �C�Ii,L11 CIVIL ENGINEERS, •PROPERTY 137_811PLON LAND SURVEYORS&PLANNERS JOB,No. t 140 N.E,THIRD AVENUE HILLSBORO,OREGON 97123 March 12, 1984 .„ 503164$•4101 . FOIA; Russ Krueger } CA oN, In the SW 1/4 of Section' 33. T1S R1W LOTI ,, W.M.' Washin ton County, Oregon PURPOSE Commercial Zonin • FCO(?IDENTIFICATION ONLY : _ r FOR U,SE ON LEGAL INSTRUMENT Beginning at a point on the East line of the Southwest garter of Section' 33,, Township •1 South Range, I West, Willamette Meridian which bears South g 330.00 feet from the Northeast Corner of the Southeast quarter 'of the Southwest quarter of said,'Section and running thence West parallel to the North line of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter 660.00 feet; thence South peral`�ct with the East ''; line of said Southwest quarter 150.00 feet; thence on the arc;,of a 640 foot radius the tight (the long chord of which bears South 60°30'I'00'9` Ras 348.00 feet} curve to 352.44 feet; thence South 41"30'00" East 188.26 feet; thencrjl North 48°30'00" East 53 y 50 feet; thence along the arc, of a 570 foot curve to the lfeft '(the long chord of whish bears North 41500" East468.22. feet) 482.50 feet t11the point of beginning,. 2 ., Containing 4.35 Acres', more or less. • L,. If Ir c.I 4 (.,, I 1 1 Cot,fot,pgtilL....0,;IvE, pi...w Awkcolkaizt4T-- — c ' 0 CF 6.C\ ,/ .��.. ., ..+,-•r.,..r^f-,i-�'�"�---�,..,,,: r. - ..T"'-":...fir--,' . --...........a__,..,, - -- .ter'` , i .' >\ ) 3.5 ' S-Caut+I�f�CURI� t I T I '. y " ii 4 . ' 12-j7,•'-' ! ' Ullfir.f r P Fr . / / ' • ''"''',",".$"''.`"`i" , "i •Y7, r G e• t" r 3 ww M ' 4 +, 1rtilr.Y.+�� F_ i1^ Y « +2x '.. il► ' s._ j rwd,"• ', Yi - 1 � '' „.v. 'x14's . �, �`"'�� +�t" 'w.� wV„ •. � fp a 'T :.''F� ,:: �. '�( y, �v I 4,:,...,„ �",""k ,�y I` , t x .; i•»+1.Z, 1,•t-4 a u,ti..-,,..,.,..,,,i,... .'r' ..3t.,,,,,/,... I• " .:'.4.,•,:,—,..'-',.....•"'} .'. i M . " ,+�`'�ry F ^` AWP .7•f � , BAR , 7 { U t• t F' F A. yy „fir 1 h a ,%::••-., x 'l�•MW.I.yi 4 Y :. ... ,., " �.. R. ,+,�'' ' ,f., Fri ". w, . li' . ,r , liv.'..1.t i 1 . '' wI as,i11 i,yt'.,.:tk 1A#, Y+ -4.� ' 41 +w`t. }t'; r]„^,'-„ ►, .,s.�k �d 1` .'' 4 :1, N two 44'4 x"« ,L ` is Y1�omy,,__*allow i+,..,,i 4`xw"N"•�{,.?x .;,, ~•!frit+, * *4 S .'" Xeit t., 1'.'r44.y" i! �-. i G ,. 1 C. 41 ,1.'1.' '" ,{7' :.t1 .1'... " '"' It"°"" )Cr iii '., • %,,,- ' '.i 1 7li. '�1!�+a 11`P.3" i r • T. `.a.i+' a �i +1 �..) .. • '.�' ♦ 1 . �'s •.r��.* .�� x"" +�,' .� d�� : +. 1,.i. �rl.�i�!. i i. ::,, it . - • .. .,.. r... , ..,_,.: .. , .,.., .,.,...... ..w,.M;..: ,.. : .,_ ._ x.„. —.i....t„.a:...,:i:;...:....5rm.,,az';;:..t,...t.....e,.,w.,.r_o u.r::r...,aurk4w,-..vatMu•. t u' n y , 4. RECEIVE $200 - Tigard Soccer Club a. City Administrator read into the record a letter from the Tigard Soccer Club regarding the $200 donation for use for maintenance and t operation of the Cook Park Soccer" fields during 1984. b. Council expressed their appreciation for donation. S. EMPLOYEE AWARDS - 10 & 15 YEAR SERVICE AWARDS a. Mayor Bishop presented awards to the City's employees who have served the City for 10 and 15 years. Those employees were: Lonnie Brenstetter, John Hagman, Robert McNatt, Robert Adams, ' Thomas Killion, Loreen. Wilson Robert Wheeler, Robert Thompson, John Newman, l'O' Richard deBrauwere, Charles Martin Jr. , John Featherston, Alice Z..' Carrick, Kelley Jennings; Dien Myers, and Mary Strickland. 6. �PUBLIC HEARIN+ - COMPREHENSIVE PLANAMENDMENT CPA 18-83 I- RUSS' KRUEGER - NP0 #7 A recommendation from Planning Commission to approve applicant's request z to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning District Map to relocate a Neighborhood Commercial designation from the west side of 135th Avenue, south of tax lot 100 to the northwest corner of tax lot 1000 along 135th Avenue. , Ilk a. Public Hearing O ened I b. Di rettor of Planning and Development reported that. this area was ( • annexed last year, and applicant wishes to relocate the Neighborhood Commercial designation. 1 I c. ub1ic 'T Testimony:. Naone appeared to ,speak.:. I Id Director of Planning and D e v.el 4Pnle t reported that tI ,Planning a nnxng ' . Gommissionrecommended approvalby unanimous vote. e. Public "Hearing Closed ''' ' I r ( I !bck,, , ' f. Motion ;by Councilor � seconded by CounoilarScott to approve , '' � j � 1. request xn dxr ec�t ataff to' prepareare ordxnance adopting findings for ', 3/12/84 meeting. Approved d° byunIa z ous Vote �ou ci1 present41 ,I , I I , I , I , i I ' , �i I II I I.. f ti ,' Com.igsioner Moen commented that the applicant had two things, in his favor, one, the subdivision borders church property that will probably not develop in the near future. Two, 'most of the lots are larger than 5,000 sq. ft. in this planned development. , • Commissioner Moen moved and kresident Tepedino seconded to, approve Subdivision S 6-83, based on staff's findings and recommendations. , Motion carried by majority of w the Commissioners present, • , Commissioners Owens and 'Vanderwcod voting no. r 11 5.4 COMPRE1EN8IiPE PLAN AMENDMENT' CPA g1e 0-,81335,tand`d& }ZS NhEol. S C".' � 3 harryil,./Rd NPO The City of 1'iand �s re uesti y g requesting Comprehensive Plan_Amendment from • g a Washington County designation 0-24 units per acre to City of Tigard designation Medium-High Density residential (13-20 units per acre) on approximately 90 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is A-20 (Multiple Family Residential); from Washington County designation 0-9 units per acre. to City; of Tigard designation Medium Dtnsity residential ,,(6.12 units per acre), on approximately 38 acres, thy, reot �sted underlying zoning district is A-12 , (Multiple Family Residential); City County from: Washington', 'designation' Neighborhood ' to Commercial ' zty of Tigard designation Commercial-Neighborhood on approximately 4 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is • C-N (Neighborhood Commercial). Associate Planner Coursolle made staff's recommendation for royal � � Pip ' for the'. , Cornprehensi've Plan Amendment and the Zone Change. He requested,'�that the Planning Commission include tax lots 700, 800, ' 1300, 1301 and 1302 in the Comprehensive ;, Plan Amendrment as Medium High density 1 • • Eu ane Fu1oP was concerned that he would ' get med ium/high He was satisfied with staff recommendation. ,Marlin Hoffer was concerned if he was Bo . undary.` �� Ne ;asked who decided what properties would be outside the,,ncluded in the annexation. Discussionfollowed regarding annexation. ' l 1, • Russell,' kruegelr :'stated he had only included those propex'ties where there is an LID. for 1.3 g• petitionkation. o Ali the property owner" ` hadsigned [which has been.•in the works for P p y s�. ne the for Anne 1 1/2 years-. PDBLIC HE ' ARIMG CLOSED r Co HISSSON DISCUSS 0I' AND,, ACTION ' • Discussiou followed ragarrang the 'Urban Crettth Boundary and areas of interest• +� Coimiiiss.ioner 'Moen mo ted and Co�tiss ones tens ;seconde4 to r,ecom end approval. to C,ity Coznpre' ens ve Plan Aiuendment CPA 10,-83 including .the tots that'.were not annexed) and approve Zone: Change way fa note that the. C,,,N zone May be u!o ed if • ea,e sa because o ' the road configuration. * l o. itn carried utiani uowtsy by Com iss is ter present. t I 1 I 1 1 , l 1 1 . I I TICARD PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting February 7, 1984 1 1 I I II I I I I 1. President Te ped�noca� called the meeting to order at7. 35P.M. . Ir he meeting g was held at, Fowler Junior High. School - LGI Room - 10865 S.W. Walnut l - Tigard, Oregon. g g 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Tepedin,.,,, Commissioners Vanderwood, Butler, 'Owens, Peterson) Edin, Fyre, Moen, Leverett., Staff: Director ,of Plarining'' and Development William A. Monahan (arrived 9:15 P.M.) ; Associate Planners Elizabeth A. Newton' andl keith Liden; Secretary 1, Diane M. <Jelderks I I 1 3. Minutes from January 3, 1984, were considered. Commissioner Owens moved ' and Commissioner Edin seconded to., approved minutes as submitted. Motion carried Iby unanimous vote o Commissioner present. Commissioners Moen and Leverett arrived. l r 4. PLANNING COMISSiON COMMUNICATION" , n„igard School District presentation.. Larry Hibbard, representing the aachool district stated the school impact forts were valuable as they use theta for plotting developments.; He would like to see a system developed when a project begins building that the school district t could be Major concerndistrictsafety + notified. J of the school is the to and frorr!, school or bus stops. Most the the,°. Tigard Schools ''. have sufficient; classroom space, however, whenBond Parkis completed they may need 'to change boundaries for Durham Sctocl Dis'cussion ' followed between Mr.. Hibbard and Piannirig 1 Commissioners concerning. how Cotn'tissiotiers should deal with school which has reached the point for; the need 'o change boundaries. Conclusion was if the school district signed off on the impact statement) it is 'the school district i s responsibility' to meet the` neets, of the development. tT 5.YiJ1 <JItEAkINGS President Tepedino, opened the` public hearing by reading the procedures to , be followed during`the`.hearing. ' 1 1 I l I Nt 5,1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN H�NI)��. CPA Il.$-83 I I ' i I, II , I ' ,� � , CANE CHANCE 2C 14-83 hues��Krueger NPO # 17 _� Land � Mapand. theZ(},l�.n �'” m l:e ' Plan se 1 o "A:; recluest' tol amend, thel o pre ns�.�� 1 1 D.istric.t " ap. to relocate .a Neighborhood Commercial designation from the west side of 13,5th Avenue,' south of ta)t lot 100, to the northwest corner Of' tak lotjl 1000 along 1.35th. Artenue. II I r I i h. 11 l i n t 1 er to ,,mad staffsrecommend fora rov'a .L o I Asso �a e'P ano. Ne n e rec.o�iiine pp . 1 r r I I I z II, i 1 o NPO COMMENTS - Richard' Boberan g, Chairm ;] for NPO ' 7 stated they supported the proposal. They felt thiis' proposal was superior to where the Commercial Neighborhood zone was presently located and liked the street alignment. ,, However, they were concerned about the size of the lot. rI r o APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Ryan d Brian Pltxnnin Consultant for the applicant was available to answer any questions. i'' o I Com " missioner Edin ', uestio'r�ed the applicant ifhe, realized he would ,, have to file ; for a variance if a oversized ,'grocery store was necessary for' the site. O r O'Brian' :stated, yes, when the, time came f o r development they would be''‘-ter know what their needs would be and` where prepared to , ,variance. Discussion followed regarding the oversized lot. PUBLIC TESTIMONY - No one appeared to speak ' COMMISSION'DISCUSSION AND ACTION Greenway d o Commrss.�oner Moen was, concerned, as the' Town. Center na started out as' a Conimecial, Neighborhood and was now much more than 'lry � that. What would prevent this from I repeating itself with this application. I A ssocit� Planner Newton stateded that the C e is more restrict1l, a Ilow I ' than Ott vias when Greenway Town Center was developed. o Commissioner Edin moved and Commissio r seconded ne Moen � :- forward to recommendation of approval to the Cicy Council. for `CPA '18-83 from imedium-high density residential to neighborhood commercial and approval of ZC 14-83 to become effective upon Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan'Amendment. Motion tarried unanimously fot approval. 5.2 SUSDvI:SI0i4 S 10-83 'Shadow Park 'Cent r 21 Pre, `ties PO I i ' I A request to subdivide apprc,imately ,201.38 acres to develop 80' `single' family detached homes, Property is designated .ow density residential and, central business I district. Property is, zoned .5 1 and' 1Z. Located at t.' 9125 SW] O'Mara St. ` (eta. Co. Tax Rap 2S1` 21:)13 '` lot 400. and,; 500) Associate te ',Planner Newton made�, e staffs re�omme, n xonfora rC, ta1, She ,toted that the Planning Cotmniss on' would have , to recommend cond�.ticrrts` as ttaff originallyhad d et'tied application because ' of i density transition"tion from ran established areas howevers Upon recalculation this was no longer a ;problem ,'The. proposal' •w`a`s below x r Si!"- de sity howeve they would need two apply for a si!"- i�tiva Lada , o I, D.�scu.s:s�;�on fol 1os+ed regard:trig reirtttv4,1, of the ,bartr icade� atitd the extension 'of Ash ,st, eet., ' IA/ANN/NG CCMISSICN )1INtUTSS "eb;ruary 2 1984 Page 2 s. jr pr z F CITY OF TIGARPi " Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION - BY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. ConcerningCase Numbers} CPA, 1:g-83 u and ZC 14-8'3 2. Name o t: Owner: Margery Krue-er & Other arae of Applicant: 3. N Russ Krueger d , Address 12225 SW 2nd Ave. y Beaverton StateZi , Cit P.._9.�Ct.�. e av OR 4. Location of Property: , Address Northeast corner of Tax. Lot 100 (1S1 33D), on gest side of SW 1351rh Ave. g p 330 lot1000 ;. Legal Description 1 S 1 • i 5. Nature of Application: To amend the Cari•rehensl.ve Plan Land Use Map .& ;toning , District Map to relocate a "Nei:hborc ood oil i ': .'' . . .s t side of 135th Ave., south of tax lot 1000 a,1ong. 135th Aire.. 6..' Action': Approval as requested I'' Approval with conditions Denial ' 7.. Notice:, �lotice waspublished in the newsper, . p.�� , ' posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant & owners XX Owners of record within the requited distance The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governdiental agencies S. Final Decision." E THB D CISZON SHA FINAL'B�; FI AL bN , � '� .�* tr 1 jil '4 1IMLBSS AN Al?1.?BAL IS FILED, The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can, be obtained from the planning Department, Tigard City pall;, 12755, Std Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9., ,Ap1,al: Any party to the decision may appeal, this deci:sion. in.' accordance. with 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 which prov des that a 'written appeal , .y filed ygiven and, dent tna be, fxl,� within 10 da.. s after notice" is d . �"" The dead l,iit,e for fi"]ing of an appa.Ls.. �.... 1 ;�1 C1 a:. t . 1 �' If you have any uestions,» please call the, Cit. of T` ,d � e� ons y � Y x�gar c P1anrxing; Departnt.ent, 659--471.. fy Preside0,,,,,,iiii , Tigard Planning Commissxon t' , 1/ATE APPROVED , I i . 0 lit rl AGENDA'ITEM 5.;1; 1 rf r rs , TI TO: TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION � FROM: PLANNING DEPAhMENT` DATE: January 31, 19"84 1. • SUBJECT: Russ Krueger COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 18-83 1. ,r ZONE CHANGE EC 14-83 11 I � On j*anuary 3, 1984, the Planning Commission continued CPA 18-83 and ZC 14-83 r. to the February 7, 1984,. meeting to, allow NPO # 7 time to meet to review this1, application. _831 endorsed approval ,of CPAat their c NPO # 7 uriazii �xsly18-83 and �G, 1.4 ma regular meeting on January 18, 1984.. Staff recomnm.ends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the ;prsPlantothe CityCouncil and approve the requested zone change tobeeffective then the City Council approves the Comprehensive #Plan Amendment. ' ' I tel 3 A 1°' ' r , 4t- ft - , r ' 11 ' i r4GCJI cr14 ,,340 1. I I I `� 0 , , to ci dmI(030OP') ' a , f , as J � Y , r ,4. WO s fy , Wim, 0 c:70..... 0.. ow 0 0 0 - CIO rt Co Q�' c , w0 i- E : ca •a � u0 t o �, CD r„ y "1 RD D. ,EC) . p On by Hi ia CD o 0 ".1 0" a „ r- °" 7" ' ' °-0 0 fn_�< m W F. m CO0 CD, -I' fa) -1 .* N =O "l1 v ti N , -, c' =" _ I• a y -.= z C N CD "r---, a 1 O tD C7 .Nr O.N �, W 4: fl !: HI -1 ""`" , fD c -« .+ r+,.... 6 osv fn m C '` c, c„, r" o a, 0 ,co Z , \ t2 t.41H.w �' a o ati 3 G Com° c H F pW. m 6D o i t C7 ►•. inp x1 t'D y„ m b I ('4, -, 0. " 0 < ° ° • f•-' n,• O (D W C7 -40 '"i(D) m so Z CD Pt ELIC HEtiatIN.GS >' z 0u The following will be'consi1:'re 1 by'the Tigard Pl�ng Coanttaission nn aw o t Pebrixary..`7, 1984, at'7:30 P.M. 1 t,Fewler Junior.Itiglt'Schoo1,,Lecture Room, w 5 a 3 10865 SW Walnut,Tigard,Oregon.Further information may be obtained from. ' .: m the Director ofPlanning and bevelapment at 12755 SW Ash Ave,, Tigard, , Oregon 97223 or by'calling 639.4171 COMPREHENSIVE':;PLAN AMENDMENTCCPA.I8.,83 Russ Krueger NPO # 7 (notItinued from January 3, 1984,Planning Commission;Meetin) SUBDIVISION S 10 ?3 Shadow Park NPO#1 q by Properties to subdivide approximately 20.38 ' , r,,., • acress �r ntuY,single21 Fro - Property is designated �� ' �.":�� Z� to developo 80 familydetached homes.P � Are nest C( iow density residt.ntial and central business district Property. is zoned 1Z ,rte ' 4.5 and R-12.Lo.iated at:9125 SW O'Mara St. (Was County Tax Map 2S1 -II c) 2DB lot 400 and 500) , it SUBDIVISION 5 1-54 G . allq s Vineyard NPO#7 � ' .�� „ ' A request by AlphaEngineering for a 15'let single family subdivision oa . .,- w 3+17'act (approx 7,500 sq ft ea,).Property iS,designated for density I 4-" and IS zoned.R 4.5 located SW 113th and SW'Tigard Street(Wa,Co,TA t' © ; , Map 15134DC lot 2991). 1 on dr eek S lI-$3 dol' , y eek Estates X11 D1,' `NPC►. 5 ., A request by Titan'Properties to Subdivide 15 27 ares to provide 34 w i ' tovrrihat� units and 67 single fai�aly detached units. The property is designated medium density;residential and is zoned R 7PD and R-12, ' I Located at:5W Kell Blvd.and SW'1'anno Creek Drive(Wa.Coi ..Tax Map 251 12Eitt lets 100,101,'3400 '3501,3709 arid 4800), SUBDIVISION S 2-84 BON)PARK III NPO#5 y `istruction Co to.Subdivide 13 acres intti 33'tots '' Arequest byWa'verl �i?� of-npproxiniately 6,059-6,004 a + ft-Tile property,is designated,medium► density resident al,and:Is,Zoned R-12,Located at:Eetvveen SW 79tH and SW 81st of'Durham Ito'ad (W`a..Cow.Tat Map 2S1 12CC lot 100,1900 land 2000). MINOR LANA P.A,RTI"TION MLP 11.84 Randall&Kelly,l3iirke NPO#3 An appeal of conditions 1, 2 and possibly 4, of the Planning Director's decision of approval to partition.a One arse lot into three lots, (tyro flag tots,10,610 sqs ft and a third lot,21,951 sq.ft.),Property is designated logit identity residential and is zoned R 4.6,Located at:104'75 S�'Park,St:(251 7:019;lot 140 4ZONE )2D1N' NCE AMEND ET�T ,20 1'84�nasi>r,u dic ai Plan Ar d en drrientsi , Are4iuestby the Cityof Tigard to amend Sections 18,80.530 and 18:. 2,090 C , n I) of de Co tntini l ria eve o merit code; limit t � � it. _ _to d c e i� quasi judicial cornpre�,,rrsl�r�plat-�mm+�rirr�ln,.ot.a Xitian, to twice a.: ear: , p ZONE O EtDt'hl'A.,C"E, *#E 15MEN ""Z A. '34 Treat ti i,ts A.; i, iwi.ti,sftb,ih, !itt,nt','i+iIfxrd tit fititOtrld,.40+41+ in IR.3/:Ui 0 nt't'be,t:'c►mntit, ' .. .... ... a 0'1:) ?NNELL, DATE January 26, 1984 {., SULLIVAN & FtAMiS ATTORNEYS AT LAW TG3B,ob rJean. BillMonahan 1727 N.W. HOYT STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 : r i5o31 222'4402 FROM' Adrianne 3rockman o , RE: Planning Commission Member Participation in, NPO Meetings and A Discussion of Conf ct of Interest Statutes I. The Cuestion You have' asked whether there is a legal problem with individual:' Planning I Commission members participating in Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) meetings. This memorandum answers that question. You will also find a discussion of other statutory provisions and principles which apply to the participation of Planning Commission members. Il. The Answer to the uestion The answer to the question is in two parts: t A. Le is lata,ve Matters A Planning COrmlmission, member may participate in an NPO meeting called for the purpose of discussing planning policy which applies city-wide. They could participate in the review of a new ordinance or an amendment to the plantext or "'ordinance text. It goes without saying that a member could also attend a mer4ting held by any other group. Legislative matters do not involve individual interests or parcels Legislative . When acting on legislative of land. matters deal with pol.:icy.. g t members act in the same manner as legislators, ' Commission therefore, there. is not a' legal problem with exparte contacts or participation matters a Planning Comm in NPO activities. ' k t , B. Quasi-ludl.cxal .Matters _ of Law Q k v, ew' the y 1 ver 1� II Thelaw is unclear as to whether a Planning Commission member could atte.nd� legally,leg all an NPO meeting. The 1983 Legislature clarified the law with regard to eXparte contacts. (See ORS 227.180(3)). The law provides that no quasi—judicial decision or action ,of a, Planning Commission or governing body shall be invalidated 'due to an exparte contact or bias resulting from an exparte contact ,with a member ;.PROVII EI the member: a. Places on the record. the,.,; substance" of any written or oral ea'parte comvunication concerning the decision or action; and; tt. Has a. public announcement of the content' of the communication made at the firsthearing following the communication where the action tofi]:l 'be considered or taken on the subject to which the :coiruitunication related. • .t; rI 1 {{J Bob Jean Bill Monahan I A Planning Commission Member Participation in NPO Meetings and A Discussion of z ` Conflict of Interest'Statutes 4 January 26, 1984- i t � Page - 2 t ct 'means a contact with the member a , x t contact' The term e par e n � by , proponent or opponent outsider of the hearing. The word contact embraces ' either a written or oral communication.! It should be noted that the, statutory language is couched in terms of "a communication . It does not say one meeting, etc. The word communication suggests limitations, ,therefore,' the question is raised as tou , whether the statutory provision' embraces voluntarily going' to any meeting to I discuss a future agenda item. The question is probably not important, 1, however, because it would be impossible for a Planning Commission member to j e ofthe put the entire ,subs tanc , meeting on the record. 'Therefore, a °:Planning i Commission cool• not comply with the law in my judgment. I I, 2. Principles !Underlying 'the ''Law ' , The following, discussion is intended to ' assist you in 4 understanding the reasons for the law. a. The Planning Commission members are actingas , �- . actingon quasi-judicial matters. In other words the g�as�. edges when � � , ;' a M l `'� themselves in a mann,�r s�:mx. r, to Planning Commission members must conduct judges. ql ! i' i II b. The decision of the Planning Commission „ affects ,; I identifiable individuals, in,erests and properties. ! cc The duty of the Planning Commission is to: , I (1) Determine the true facts; I, (2) Apply approval 'criteria to the facts; and I ' I (3) Render a decision., i Commission i d t .;' be approved �f he d. The application will pP finds the approval criteria are` satisfied by the facts. I The.refore,, the , determination of the...tru.e facts is is' one n .' I° most important a�•e�tof the heari S e. ;The partes to the hearing -~ the , applicant, proponents I and opponents are entitled to, a fair hearing. A fair hearing is a hearing , , I where all of, the testimony is heard' by all parties and where all of the parties have a". opportunity to;rebut, untrue and inaccurate testimony. f44 It is intended' that the rebuttal process will lead to t i t i the, identification of the trues facts. , I 'I, '' , II I With 1 the above r►fo.�mation, let us assume that a particular item is d .sonssed at, an N1,�O meeting oranyi ' � � � � g other �ee.t ng, ands � a f�,annxng '+�otmrt�,as�one is in attendance. The Member' will have 'been eposed to many alleged acts whioh. may or' tiiay not be true* The applicant 'who hast an interest in the g, Bob Jean Bill Monahan Planning , Commission Member Participation in NPO Meeti s and A Discussion of }, Conflict'of Interest Statutes January 26, 198 3 I . Pae I g decision will not have an opportunity to rebut the discussion. The Plan n n g I ' Commission memberwill act on the facts unless the same issues should happen , ' to arise at the hearing. Fairness cannot be left to happenstance, however. , ' Therefore, the law requires the Planning Commission member to put the facts on , Y + I the record. This allows, for rebuttal. III. Other Matters of Concern to Plannix_ig. Commission Members , i.ssion A. Statutory P °_S ut 'rovis ions Wh zch Apply toQuasi-Judi.c�.al and Legislative I ., • Matters Law,1. Conflict of Interest State Ethics' UItS Ch. 244 State statute, IONS Ch. 244, known as the State Ethics Law, I for public officials havinga potential, establx.shes certain requirements P 'conflict, of interest. The law applies to all public officials includin , , Planning Commission members. With respectto land use matters, the focus of • , the law is to:o. IE I i a, Prohibit a public:, official from using the position to obtain financial gain for themselves or a member of their household;, and b. Prohibit a public official from furthering' their 'personal gain ,'through the use of confidential information gained in the course ' of their official ''duties: A Planning Commission member has., an interest if the person stands to gain or lose'' by a decision depending on the way the decision is `made. A Planning Commission member has a potential' tonflict of interest 1when the member 'or a person in the member#+s household could be ,financially ben.efited or harmed by ,a recommendation or a decision on , a+ certain matter 11 except where the 'deoision; wouldaffect a large class of people of which the 'member of the hearings= body is a member - ORS 244.020(4)., , The law pr. �rx. es hat, a (1) Any member of a PlannittgCommission tstho has a potential conflict ofPublicly announce the nature est mita .. r,e of the.. inter must <p .. y. � steres t prior to taking any official action (ORS1244.120(1)(e)); 2potential conflict of interest ' need � � The only be announced ionce ( 1 S 244.120(2))` n I potential conflict , of interest:'' must be recorded in The the official records (0)1S 244.130(1)).; I I (4) , C t4o d,e,c,ision shall be voided by the court solely by reason +' of ' a meMber''s failure to disclose a conflict of interest';, (ORS 244.130(2))1 4 ) I I • • i I d , - Bill Monahan I {' Bob Jean' : I Planning ComCommissionMemberMember Participation in NPO Meetings and A Discussion of Conflict of Interest Statutes January r Ia 26, 1984 ' Pae 4 g I , • I I I I $ imposed d may � �,�:_e 1.000 00be not to �a t peva. I �5) civil �. y I I A civ ` (ORS 2 .350 or, ialati.n the law - 44 ) ,' _ I I fort/ f A 'member of the Plan.ia._, , .��,��miss.>.on who has financially ally , ' benefited or any otherperson within the sc o 3c .,t the' lacy maybe required to Y � forfeit twice the amount I gain,e,d (ORS 244.360). T 1 ORS- 22 :035. I t t_ 7 I I 2. Conflict of �n eyes I 'I , ORS 227.035 applies to both legislative and State -law, � FP g � I a i- udreal 'matters a nd provides that a member of Pla Commission shall' not participate in' any commission Proceeding or action in which any of the following has a direct or substantial financial interest: the member, the ` tnemher`s ,spouse, brother, sister, child, parent, father-in-law, mother-in-law, partner in any business of which themember' is or has been ,a member within the previous two years or ill any business which which t).ie. member is negotiating or I I <has an arrangement ement ori understanding concerning prospective partnership or I employment. Any actual or 'potential interest shall be disclosed at the ♦ meeting of the commission where the action is being taken. I I ' 3. ,Bias . I Impermissible bias applies to quasi-judical matters. I The word bias means having certain 1 preconceived thoughts 'about 'issues of policy, the law, the fasts, or the parties and includes having a personal 'bias, personal prejudice`or 4 terest in the outcome. . A member. of `a t-xear�.ngs body may not participate in the. I decision if themember is impermissibly Ibiased (Neuberger v City of Portland, '11e , the mi ible bias takes on o P2d Im er ss I 288 ' or 1.5�5� 697 722, 7251�8:J�� p following fortes:, d' -ment concerningissues of fact a. The,.member has a pre,�u g iss about 'the parties;, , • b. The ,member hasa personal bias or I persenal prejudgment for or against a party. as ,distinguished from Ia personal' bias regarding an aspect of the law or policy; or ., hasan interest n the outeome of 'I;ithe c: The. member; hearing (`Davis, Aditinistrst e. La'w Tett, Ch.. 12, Bias, p. a+5 (1972) I I ' 1 I I me. ..b.er of an; 'approval lauthor�ty who is permissibly ibly biased 1 ' may Iprt�cpate. ' Lii 'the decision. Permissiblebias' involves a preconceived point of view about' '4hat the eppl'icabie' lair is or what the ';policy is or should be.. 1 1I u I I i I I � II r: I i. r I I II I. + I I r r I ' I I 1 I I , ,. -,fix .x . .+AH.....,-..un4.G...+>...Ta_..K,,..k..«4.11....A....,.,«.M1a x.4KU[,,.I,...tiM.-rv{+.v,L..wxu,..,.4...-?..R,!4M..A7.,X.Y-+-...(it ,,..Y...Vx,.J t u. :...I .i�,., ,. I_. , • iu.l.lNi Y'..4 .al.,.Yi rW... Bob Jean Bill Monahan Plannin: Commission' 'Member 'Part ioi•ation in*'NPO sI on of Conflict of Interest.Statntes January 26, x.984 x, Page 5 ,. 4. Participation in;'the Hearing ; The question arises as to whether a disqualified person may pa;rl, icipate in the hearing but not vote. The statute directed towards 3'.. Planning Commission members (ORS 227.035) prohibits any member falling under z,. the ''statute from participating. A person otherwise disqualified may participate provided the comments are not basedon impermissible bias and the comments do not prejudice theparty {Yost v City of Ontario, 2 Or LUBA 49, g 52-53 (1980)} A. /pn(02llp) I I I 1. III t I { r.; �I II I y u v � � s — BXH I z zT a I, 10 N I I / I I I I y.‘ I ►ASHINGTO N Cul.) IN r I I ik ' ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,— 150 N. FIRST AVENUE I 1 11 I 1 HILLSBOR.O,OREGON 97123 1 1 1 I I I BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1 I PLANNING DEPARTMENT MMI I � I 1 WES MYLLENB.CK, Chairman 1503648'8761 BONNIE L. HAYS, Vice Chairman I EVA M, KILLPACK N' I JOHN E. MEEK LUCILLE WARREN I ' I I - 11 1 January 10,11984 I I , l ' ' i4 William Monahan, Plannng Director City of Tigard P.O. I'Box 23397 w Tigard, Oregon 97223 Mark :Brown Metropolitan- Service District , 527 SW Hall Street Portland, Oregon 97201 1 A review of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan by METRO indicates that the Plan cannot be found in compliance with Goal 2 because Washington County has not adopted a consistent plan' for the unincorporated portions of the Tigard 1 annin Area. Mark Brown I IWilliam Monahan havE1 requested'that Active 'Planningand Wi y ,` , nmake County explain its position and a written commitment to proceed 'with' resolving this matter. Washington County is willing to i nig ti ate the process to adopt a consistent plan for the unincorporated area as soon .as i, 1 the Department of Land Conservation and bevelopment Ideter1ili nes 1 that the Tigard I Comprehensive Plan i s i n a' form that complies with the LCDC.,.goals andaguidelines. L1 I U dUnder the requirements rements of the Washington County Charterthe procedure to adoptt ha land use ord�'nanceissomewatcostlyand time consuming. Personnel and budget restrictions allow us to undertake such an action only once. In addition, the 'County wishes to avoid confusion and uncertainty on the part of property owners that may result should the County be required to undertake 'such an action ' more than' once for the same are... With regard to the five c.ities in Washington ' ill County with active plans(Cornelius, Forest Grove, Hillsboro, Tigard and Tualatin) 1 " ' it has been the. County's policy`to wait until a city's plan has received a' pre- 1 iminary review by DLCD, If it is 'F61.111d lto be either in compliance'with statewide Planning 0oa1 s or to have only m i nOr problems that do not directly affect the - 1 County, the County will initiate 'adoption procedures To date, the County has applied this policy to Corete1 i us Forest Grove and Hillsboro and,;in eatch case has I successfully adopted 'the :necessary ordinances to 'implement their plans in the run - I I iL I incorporated portions of their 'active planning areas. I j I 1 1 II' ti I - I 1I r _ I L , I 1 I, 1! 1 I '111 I I I I I I 1 I I II I I i I :. i .. an'' �� t1�;I� til�':�c►t'�'t�trlt�� +��i�,��i r,i,oe William Monahan Mark Brown January 10, 1984 II Page 2 I hope this letter clarifies the County's position regarding the adoption of activeplans. specific . If you have any questions regarding thismatter, please contact Kevin Martin at 640-3552. Richard A. Daniels Planning Director I I . I , RAD.KM.MBM I I I I I IL II,I II I I ..I I I , I L I c: Brent Curtis, Plan Manager I I II I I 1 I i I I I I I I r I � I I I I I I I I I I I I LI I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I II I LI I I I , �I I r. 11 I I I I I I I i it I � I , I I n I I. I I I I I I i I I I I I II '.I • w w � S I' TAP�F REPORT ` I AGENDA ITEM 5.2 I � January 3, 1.98 7:30 P.M. �" I TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION i ' 10865 Sid WALNUT: ST. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 I it I I A. FINDING G 0F FACT t, : i , I 1. General Information I f CASE: CPA 18-83 Comprehensive Flan Amendment Krueger. NPO # 7 ZC 14-83 ' Zone Change I '' I �. I I � REQUE T» Iamend To a en d t hef Co m prehensive Plan Land Use Nap and the Z onin ! , District Map to relocate,' a f Neighborhood Commercial 'designation from the west side of 135th Avenue,, south of tax I I', lot 100 to the north corner of tax lot 1000 along 135th COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium-High Density Residential f r ZONING DESICNATION. R-20 I I RECOMMENDATION: Based on staff's analysis of applicable plan policies, ' provisions set forth in the , Tigard Community ' ' Development Code and field inestigation, staff '11, 1, recommends that the Planning Commission recommend , approval of the Comprehensive Plait. Amendment Ito the City Council' as;' requested I and approve the regties ted zone; change to be :;effective when the City " Cout c.il� { ,I approves the CPA. •PLICAN,C» Russ Krueger OWNER:, �ar g erY Krueger & Other ' ? 12225 SW 2nd Ave.I ' Rt.' 1 Boat 792 I` I' Beaverton,'I Or. 97005 Beaverton,' Or. 97007 f I I ' LOCATION!'. No rt he�s t corner of to lot 1000 (1 S i 33D),; on west side o f , I I SW 135th Avenue. I. I I LOT AREA: APP� � m e y �.� acres. NPO C0 .EN1« . w � No `+�'titten �eo e' t had I I I I mm n ha been re+�ex.ved at the writing of this a.e ort, G i i I I y" � i I I f PUBLIC NOTICES,.MAILED: Nine notices were haile * No written cow tits I If1had been,°re eived at the t r ,tang of this report'. BacRbttnd f f I I f f f I I. Ont A g:uat 242. the l City CouI tt a ap Prov ed COM p:rehetisive Plan Amendment request and des .gtiated the stub,; et site as teditm- .gh Iet1seity j l ea i tetzt iai ,f. I » F • On July 12, 1933, the Planning Commission approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Zone Change request for the subject site and designated it as R-20. On June 23, 1983, the Portland Metropolitan Area Boundary Commission annexed the,subject property to the City of Tigard. In Jurue, 1983, the City agreed to utilize the County's land use designation for the annexation area. These designations were closely a hea to City designations. In April, the Washington County Board of Commissioners adopted the land use designations for the Bull Mountain Community Plan, CPO # 9. This document was later adopted with the other portions of the County • :.Comprehensive Plan via an engr�ts meat ordinance. 3. Vicinity Information The sx,lrrounding land uses are as follows: The areas to the north, south and west, are vacant and are designated Medium-High Density Residential, gn densityresidential. . are d } ess� aced medium The areas: to the t } eas 4. Site Information • The subject property is a vacant,t� fairly rly flat agricultural cultu a l land d covered with grass. I , B. APPLICABLE PLANNING POLICIES „ . 1. Comprehensive ?l.an .policies 2.1.1 THE CITY SHALL I+iAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEI NT PROGRAM `ND A I , S ASSURECITIZENS WILL LL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY ;. TO BE INVOLVED IN ALL , }1A ES . Or TilE,PLA NTNG PROCESS. , All owsite owners of record' within 250 feet of thiswere notified by mail on December, 22, 1983, of the application A notice ,w.. s „ request. as published in the Tigard Tzmes. 2.1.3 TI-IE C,I'T'Y SHALL ENSUURI THAT INFORMATION ON LAND USE PLANNING ISStrES IS AVAILABLE IN' AN UNDERSTANDABLE FORA: FOit ALL, INTERESTED,CITIZENS. , 1 All interested parties are given at least 10 days to comment on application requestS and are encodraged to ' do so. In addition , the planning .staff is available on a regular. basis . � g to answer any cities tions on specific. xapp1ications . All of the Com” rehensiv�: Plan policies ,� were, reviewed in light of this Comprehensive Plan. Amendment.' this amendment proposal; enerall.,.. meets the plan ..: related� policiesto c'itlzen :,],nv17lv�.'Iifent 5 �•. tra'naportetiori, acid' public acilitie,s. k ;Pill18'-til ... STAPP �POit'T ��:, l8 �� and �C, 1��3 PA0R „ I r ' .. 4 - — r ...., ,... ...re.. v..•-.,- .,. ._.,:,... n`In,:rl n ta}el iy IM1.x nVH'11.+LI#:"B iA't.,54E4 J1NiIMdI N1.Y 11. b(xr'Lµf llYr nW rt.Js:nW'• , 1 • The specific' policies that pertain. to t;� land use des. gnaat(kon are found 1n the Locational Criteria, and are as f;: lows Commercial: (4 l2. ..1 THE CITY SHALL: a. PROVIDE FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOP LENT BASED 014 THE , • TYPE OF USE, ITS SIZE AND REQUIRED TRADE AREA. • bf. APPLY ALL APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES. ` c. APPLY THE APPROPRIATE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE SCALE OF THE PROJECT. • Neighborhood Commerc,7i.a1 Neighborhood commercialcenters are intended to provide • convenience goods and services within a cluster of stores. Convenience goods are goods which arebought frequently, at least • weekly, and for which people do not engage in comparison shopping. The uses permitted in the neighborhood center include L. convenience markets,, beauty shops, barber shops:' and repair shops. • The. rang., of uses is limited to those uses which can be sustained r by a trade area. A ca e (l) "Trade Area. Up 5000 people. to �P p (2) Site ,,Size Two acre. 'maximum. (3) Grosse Leasable Area. Varies. • ' B. Locational Criieri:a • • (1) Spacing and IIi cs t i.on. f , (a) ' The service area. radius far a neighborhood commercial center shall be at least one half of J' a mil e. (b) Commerciali development shall be limited to one P uadrant of a street intersection or where there no street intersectioitb to one side- e. of the street. (2) Access i . (a) The *iroposed center or expansion of an edisting f` center shall riot create traffic congestion or a • traffic safety' problem'. Such a: determination shall be based on the street capacity, exist ne and 'projected traffic volumes,, the ,srpeed lim t, STA' ` .tEPtirtT' - 'CPA '18-81 and Zc, 14-8'3 PAGE' ' , • _ * as s w:w..xsss,,esxxo,t:,,,,,..;f e4 +,,.tlf....,.uy.w ,... x C t } J .,...,.-,-.. ,_.,..»,..y �J... _.,-.a.,aL..•M...,:;v.,.. ..♦..,. ,e:,:. eN.;.,: i....,.s,,...:. ...,»:i.a.._....y..W„u.a:. .. ... ,... .. number of turning movements and the traffic generating characteristics of the mostinteinsive use allowed in the zone. {h) The site shall ha-s-e direct access from one of the following. r,t arterial. (ii)`, A. collector stceet which wall not direct I i traffic through local neighborhoodstreets. (3) Site characteristics. '.the site shall be of a size which can accommodate the p---,,..sent and , ut future uses.. but shall not exceed tiro acres. ( ) Impact ac. tAssessment ess rnent I , I The scale of the project shall be cd;mp,�ttible (a) p ,� wi,r-h the surrounding uses. , (b; The site conf�,,s ;oration and characteristics and , relationship nship to ms; the street systeshah. be such that privacy of adjacent non-commercial uses can 1 , be maintained. rp t. unique � possible to �.nco.. orata he (c) It hal oss 4 , features into the site design and development lan (d), The associated lights, noise and activities shall ; Inot interfere with adjoining non-residential use F. I I � I i , I , i I I s I I � r E I I I I i STAn REPOAT , CPA .t1-8,5 'and ,Z0 14-83 - PAGE 4 f The Neighborhood Commercial shopping center would have a small grocery store with some neighborhood shops. The applicant has not determined 1 the exact size 0g the center yet (approximately 3.5 acres). However, 11j1° . the gross floor area of the buildings would be about 40,000 square feet (the grocery store would probably be about 20,000 square feet). The, subject site has direct access to a major, collector, i.e., SW 135th ''` Avenue. Street widening and realignment of the Murray Blvd, the Old and i` 11 New Scholls Ferry Road,,intersections will be necessary before the full t- urban development can occur in this area. Specifically,� the proposed ed alternative alignment of 135th Ave. and Scholls Ferry Road is essential, h.. since it. helps define the exact location of the neighborhood comumercial, , center. The alternative alignment was development by Robert Keech (Mr. ' Krueger's property ,traffic assessment study) and was presented to the i ; , City and County staff on December 8, 1983.`, The commercial centerwould be limited to the inorthwest corner of the proposed intersection (of I ' 135th Ave. and Scholls Ferry Road). , 1 0 `I I SW135th Avenue needs, major improvements before much development evelopment can occur. Currently, a joint City/County Street. L.I.D. study is in process , , I for 135th Avenue. 'a I. I '1`heneighborhood commercial center. would be compatible with the surrounding land uses which include ,.,.e,dium and medium-high , density , residential, and lit would also provide an arille supply of landscaped coverage cl-ouad anly> be about 25%. area, since the commercial site 2. Tigard Community Develo ment C •ode , ° qDevelopment , All. ,of the requirements set e forth,., in the Commt;�n�ty,� Code have been considered 'inreview of this: application.' The. I important limitations.tat ions on uses; in a neighborhood commercial_ are as '' AI ° I I follows- I N+ , 18.604945 Specie Limitations on Uses A. , The use , shall be conducted wholly within an enclosed structure, except 'as -allotiad in subsection. (C) below. 1 1 B. No use shall have a gross' floor area greater than 4,000 ;1 ' square feet. ' ' C. ' Accessory open a.`.i.r ales/display/storage shall be, permitted , , for horticultural and rood' merchandise only ' and' shall ' , , than 5 b o f the to s s constitute no more I � ` building floor area l 'I , ' , I I 1 of arty individual estab,lishttent. , I D. ,Use's,,,.,..: opeating before�e 7a 00 A,14. and aftol 10:00 1 `Ri • shall 1 i be subject to the Cn.ditiona1. Use prov .sio+ns, Chapter 18.130. > I .1 is very ii. titporta�n`t, since' 'the appli.caut ` is proposing a 20,000 square uare ft e.t ,,grocery store along with other uses over 4,000 square feet in area (totals ,g��ss floor area; c� the lau.�,ld�.�rg�l would be about 40,0000 f` i square feet) in. the proposed neighborhood comt terc.ial center. 'I ierefore p icanto st'omy.t a, 'pari I I the a y1 � is required � t y'ance;, application to the, City I before, the Eros) deve;1opment plans are 'reviewed* J STAPF' '11:Rp�P.T!, , CPA 18-83 and 2C, 14-83 �� 1?AO% 5 t 4 u.✓•rk..u; ...,+,auCY/J.N..G'L_:.Ya:M'.:u... %.._a4_dx:.. ../'4 .. t...i'.M1.0.1�.n:.,;ryti i „lwiu,+.'I,... ,:N.1+-f,,....1„+..A,:r.n+...,Ix.;.vtt. cw'4.. ':.1 f'_-. uaM�)»*,M...�'.i..0.U. ., ...4. «+fie.« .I......J.Y .... t ' l 4, C. CONCLUSIONS i'-r The prc-;�,.osed Comprehensive Plan Amendment meets allof the applicable '', ° plan policies and locational criteria. However, there are; two remaining issues to be resolved, concerning the neighbr'n;nood commercial area. " Firstly, the Cit) and County have to approvethe pi csed road alignment for 135th. Avenue and Scholls Ferry Road ir.cersection (there seems to be 1 a consensus over this alignment amongst the City and County staff). The second issue concerns the size of the neighh i rhood, cot aercial area. �.;. ' The County comprehensive plan has designated 4 acres for commercial area ' . while the City's locatioti,a1 criteria sets a 2 acre maximum. Although i' the acreage is excessive according to standard, staff believes that during this interim time, before the €iraal development plans are reviewed (including road alignments), the designated acreage is i. appropriate. Until that time, staff 'believes it is appropriate to adopt „,' the` County's designations as indicated on the CPO # 4 Bull Mountain [ 4` Community Ph ! an i D. RECOMMENI)'ATIONS I , I i�. ' Comprehensive Staff recommends approval of the Com rehensIive Pla n Amendment � C PAii 18-83) and Zone Change (2C l`1µ,-83) request as proposed by the applicant. ,. Recommended 'Motion: ' I i Should. ' the PlanningCommission decide `to ,a rove the request as ' PP � presented, the following motion may be made Ij "'Move .to forward recommendation rtf approval to theCouncil for CPA PP City a 18-83 from medium-high density restLd.ential to neighborhood commercialI andeffective upon Council approval of approval of ZC' 11r-83 Ito become effect' the Comprehensive Plan Amendment." 1 F r 1 t 4� s , "'' bit , r w"v efoor , ' \ \r‘ I I l 1 PRI~ ishvaze I i APPROVEII BY William A. Monahan ' Assi'atant Planner Director of Manning Et iI t 1 Development , , t !4 G 2 P din I , I � I I , � I I rl , I l I 1" STAFF RZPOEtT !CPA: 18'-88 end Zit' 14'-'83 - PA t, 6 , _ / I • , r f w I • r I I STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.2 January uar 3, 198 7:30 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION 10865 SW WALNUT ST. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 • If , A. FINDING OF FACT I G 1. General Information formation , II CL'A 18-83 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Krueger NPO 7 • CASE: P �-- .0 4Zone Chan 1 3 Change -8 g Land Us e" Mapand the ,..iniTo ' REQUEST: � ensive Plana District Map to relocate a Neighborhood Commercial designation from the vest side of 135th Avenue, south of tax lot 100, to the northwest corner of tax lot 1000 along 135th f Avenue �-^ COMPREHENSIVE' ,PIAN, DESIGNATION:ON� Med�u m �Hl g h bens ity Residential tJ R-20 S �t TI ON: I D'E O N ... I C A Z T I i IRE0Z,IMENDATION:1 Based on. staffis analysis of applicable plan. policies, C provisions ' set forth in the Tigard Community '; '• Developmenttigation, staff ti. ,Code and fields: x.rtvesrecommends that the Planning CommL.ssint. recommendvii a .proval of the Com r Comprehensive to thea sx.ve: Plan Amendment I approval I p p City requestedand approve the requested i1 as Councbe effective when the CityCouncil,' .,, ne chan�,�P to zo I approves the l CPA. .ANT: Russ Krueger OWNERS g y gOther ,� APPLICANT: g �, Mar e,r �Crue er & 0 x Rt. 1 9 12225 SW2nd II Beaverton Cr. 97005 Deeverton, ;Or. 97007 I i I I a 15 33D- on west side. of � t , of tax ,lo 100 l �, hOCATION. 1Vor�.hecorner as i SW 135th ';Av e w m tel � 5 acres. �, � C1X,7. �� L0� AEE PPr .. d the � y.�,t In o .ten'. comm ��ex.�ed at h. r g t�PO COMI�� • Na ad;,been re ort �; � this resp PUBLIC 11OTYCES.,RAILED: ,Nine notides . w 'were tzxaile.t4 written cbmtenC',s had been. receivedat the 'wrung of this report. I � `r ound e� �at� Oa Augus '22 1985 the city, CQu+nc.x�l, approved a �Cvmprehnsi've Plan D enu dnt request: and designated the` Subject site as ted uta .gh Density 4 � 1 N it I ' On July 12, 1983, thePlanning Commission approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Zone Change request for the subject site and designated, it as Tt-2O. On June 23, 1983, the Portland Metropolitan 'Area Boundary Commission '1 '; annexed the. subject property _to the City of Tigard. In June, 1983, the City agreed to utilize the County's land use designation for, the annexation area. These designations were closely M matched to City' designations. In April, the Washington County `Board of CaII "i l5s ©Reis adopted d the land use designations for the Bull Mountain Community Plan CPO # 9. This document was later adopted with the other portions of the County Comprehensive Plan via an engrossment ordinance. 3. Vicinity Information. The surrounding land uses are as fallows " The areas to the north, south and west are vacant and are designated Medium-High Density Residential. The areas to the 'east lare designated medium density ,residential. ' I � Site 'Information , The , subject property is a vacant, fairly flat agricultural land covered ` " with grass. , B. APPLICABLE PLANNING POLICIES fi . Comprehensive flan I a l icifs . .1. THE CITY SHALL MAINTA1 AN' ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT 1 PROGRAI4 AND SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVI E'� D AN OPP'OR`1~UNITY,i TO BE INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES ' I i OF THE `PLANNING'PROCESS. I , Owners of record within 230 feet' o f this site were,Al �. notified by mail on December, 22, 1983, of the application request, A notice was published in the Tigard Times. 2.1.3 TtIE.. CITY SHALL' ENSURE' THAT .INFORMATION ON LAND USE i' PLANNING ISSUES IS AVAILABLE IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE FORS • FOR ALL INTERESTED CITIZENS. All interested parties are given, at least 10 days to comment ment : nn appl�, �o'k�t�catrrequests � and are encouraged tso. In a do. additions the. plartn&rtg staff .is }availaabie. On, a regular basis ' to an4tter any questions on specific, �ppl icatin os a Cs -were. reviewed in light o"f All. of the � aispr�.hens" v�. Plan pol.icie this Comprehen.siVe Putt Ame.ndatetit. This amendment proposal n,1Veuent. �generally �ee.ts the plan p+�3��,c�.es related to e�t�z�en 1 rad' , tta'nsportattbns and ,p'tiblie facl'itles: > STAFF REPOT CRA 1843 and ,Lt .k4-8, ' PAa 2 �. y 6 �r i, _ t ... .i,w,4,....—J.,,.,..:�...... .�..+,+7.,.»aw.-, .+.V...%......-Fu,,,,M,a.1,_t..w., ,,:�1.a....i;, ,....-, wi.,.«,-,.tu�„wa4.m.. .i+"� .�1 M, ,.. ;., „-._,,. . .w„ i •rii°�°'"' The specific policies that pertain to the land use designation are found in the Locational Criteria, and are as follows: Commercial: 12.2.1.l THE CITY SHALL: a. PROVIDE, FOR COMM`a RCIAL DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE TYPE OF USE, ITS SIZE AND REQUIRED TRADE AREA. b. APPLY ALL APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES. c. APPLY THE APPROPRIATE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE SCALE OF THE PROJECT, Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood commercial centers are intended to provide convenet;ce goods and services within ` a. cluster of stores. Conveuie:-Lce goods are goods which are, bough: frequently, ''at least weekly, and for which people do not engage in comparison shopping. The uses permitted in the neighborhood center include convenience markets, beauty shops, barber shops and repair shops. The range is limited to , those uses which can be sustained by a ?'amited trade area. A. Scale (1) Trade Area. Up to 5000 (2) Site Size. Tiro acre maximum. (3) Gross Leasable Area. Varies. B. Locational Criteria � . (l) Spacing and Location ' I (a) The service area radius for a neighborhood commercial center shall be at least One half of a utile: (b) Commercial development shall, cue' limited to one quadrant of a street; intersection. or where there is `nJ street intersection., to ontr, side o`f eh:e. street , i Z Acces,, yy (a) The proposed reinter or expansion of an existing, IL T e.enter .shall 'tot creeate traffic congestion, or a, ' + r.affic safety problem. Such a detetliiinattion .shall ye based on the street, capacity, e :I.atiti gnd pyo jtcted traffic volumes, the ;speed tiMit, I sir ST,APV Rg OIt't- CPA18-83 a..gid Z • • I � „ 1C number of turning movements and the traffic. ,. generating characteristics of the most intensive use allowed in the zone. (b) The site shall have direct access from one of the following: (1) An arterial. (ii) A collector street which `will not direct traffic through local neighborhood streets. (3) Site Characteristics. The site shall be of a size ,` which can accommodate 'the present and future uses; but shall not exceed two acres. (4) Impact Assessment (a) The scale of the project shall be compatible with the surrounding,_uses. (b) The site, configuration and characteristics and relationship to the street system shall be such that privacy of adjacent non—commercial uses can be maintained. ; ' (c) It shall be possible to incorporate t:heunique features into the site design and deve=lopment ' plan. r (d) The associated lights noise and activities shall not interfere with adjoining d non-residential uses» ti ;I I • - I I � ' r i Y STAF,P RE OWr CM 18,''-'83 atrid EC 1.4...-83 PAC I , , ; �r I r y Ct=^ r+f i ... „a., IIS. .. ,..,+,.J, „ar. ,......i«...at...u✓�rt.,nr e 4 � I The Neighborhood Commercial shopping center would have a small grocery ;;' store with some neighborhood shops. The applicant has not determined the exact size of the center yet (approximately 3.5 acres). However, the gross floor area of the buildings would be about 40,000 square feet 4<<` (the. grocery store would probably be about 20,000 square feet). The subject site has direct access to a major collector, i.e. , SW 135th Avenue. Street widening and realignment of the Murray Blvd, the Old and New Scholls Ferry Road intersections will be necessary before the full •' urban development can occur in this area. Specifically, the proposed alternative alignment of 135th Ave. and Sol-tolls Ferry Road is essential, since it helps define the exact location of the neighborhood commercial , center. The alternative' alignment was development by Robert Keech (Mr. Krueger's praperry' traffic assessment study) and was presented to the City and County staff Qn i December $, 1983. The commercial center would be limited to the northwest corner of the proposed intersection (of 135th Ave. and Scholls Ferry Road). I I 'IP I SW 135t17# Avenue needs major improvements before much development can y, Y Y occz�:r. 1'aurrentl '' a joint Dint Cit .'Count Street L.I.D. study is in process ' f r 135th Avenue. Theneighborhoodcmmercal center would d be compatible with the , surrounding:; land uses 'which include medium and medium.-high density ' residential, and it would also provide an ample supply of landscaped 13 ' area, since the commercial site coverage would only be about 25%. 2. Tigard Community Development Code r I • , All: of the requirements set forth in the Community Development I Code have, ,been considered in review of this application. The ' important limitations on uses in a neighborhood commercial are as r . follows. ' it �I .. t 18.60.045 Special L11 tnitations on Uses Y , A. The use, shall be conducted wholly within an enclosed structure, except as allowed in j subsection ��wi .. ! I , No use shall have a gross; floor areagreater, than 4,000 feet,eet.; C. Accessory open air sales� p lay/storage shall be permitted forhorticulturalandfoodmerchandise only and shall constitu'te no more than 5� of the grosybizzlig floor area }�+ of any individual establishment.; D. Uses operating before 70O A.M. and after i0.00 P.M.. shall . 'be subject to the Conditional alae provisions, Chapter 18.130. I, Item, IB is veryim `ortant nthe ' E. since applicant o os n is �a 2"� D r 0 ��. �° p' � p p g ; , aquare feet ;grocery rstore along with other uses over 4,000 square .feet, I in area (total gross floor area, of the buildings aoul.d be about 40,00() aquare feet) in the proposed 'neighborhood comm r :ial Center. Therefore, ' the applicant is required to submit a variance application to the City • .before the final development plans are reviewed. It S'l;",Af"P _ittRC3Ft,x Cf`_:. 1S-82 and 2,0 I 1442 PACE N r - � ,Y S III 'I I ia . •»..,..- . ..a wx,t,'.,, i. 4,1a,.,:.Ywew.{mlml..a...,.J, ,M..M..-n....l...i.h.,1.....4 w+i.Yltll�rw..,... ..11» ,,M,, )J1 '/ C. CONCLUSIONS 1 The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendm,eat meets all of the applicable plan po13, .ties and locational criteria. However, there are two remaining tir issues to be resolved coucerning the neighborhood commercial area. Firstly, the City and County, have to appIve the proposed road alignment for 135th Avenue and Schollls Ferry Road intersection (there seems to be a consensus over this alignment, amongst the City and County staicf). The second issue concerns the size of the neighborhood commercial area. • 4 acres for com ie:ccial area whilethe Ci The Coun c ty's locationalmprehe�lsve plan has designated criteria sets a 2 acre -maximum: Although gaccording standard, staff believes that the acreage is excessive to 4 during this interim time, before the final development plans are t reviewed (including road alignments), the designated acreage is A appropriate. Until that time, staff believes it is appropriate to adopt the County's designations as indicated on the CPO # 4 Bull Mountain Community Plan. D. RECOMMENDATIONS ' Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA, 18-83) and Zone Change (ZC 14-83) request as proposed by the applicant. Recommended Motion: 1; Should the Plannzng Commission decade to approve the request as presented, the following motion may be made: I "Move to forward recommendation of approval to the City Council for CPA ,, 18-83 frommedium-high density residential to neighborhood Commercial arid approval of ZC 14-83 to become effective upon Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment." ,, .1, !tv., ,r,l,' !. 'v'ittOr 44e ,....,00 ,,..•..? , , ,,,2_, t.., .-,..C...). 1J .N,...,-4, • PRE . . . *is vaxe APPROVED ;8Y: William A. Monahan Assistant Planner Director of planning; & f. Development , (C)250P)dm. • x I 4; ;AI >= STAFF REPORT' - 'CPA 18-83 and 2,C, 14-83 - PAC8 ,, I i ,1 . 3 ..,.> ;. u.. zY.,.' .,.. {{ ...0 s S, r, u.. ". .w ✓ wia(s«naua,r r ...trT��j ,7> ,ua.dti .;r 4 * «� v sa� • ,( 4J° a. Myr3w+C"a .t! a aY.« o r,.a')RM � "'j':a a .i1 '".,i wr~ • ..•+ � (� >`s .•,«t » 2f ,: ,C r. y�I • 1 'lA. S *. - r} •A� .� M • Commissionr Fyre questioned the nonconformance of the existing-sg :,, Discussion $oliowesi regard t g sig .c tdei` f iix<z.tLr��tfs a;nd,;e fox. .emeh :'.,, ,y ; ;' ' �' ,PUBLIC- HEARING I CLOSED"r ti -i • '''Comnisioners Edin . and Vaneerwood supported request as not being unreasonable. iI I I 4 Commissioner Owens did not s� pporti , would rapther see sign brow ht I yy„i into conformance. • Commissioner Fyre and Butler supported as this would eliminate the 4 existing nonconforming sign. They would like to see the sign code followed, however, this request would only be a 10% increase. • ( President Tepedino was concerned, with all the work that went into putting theexception g sign code ether,<, tag , t o turn I around Iazid make exce tion. to '' , the code, might l..e establishing la precedence. He questioned if there tomake a compromise. •was some way p I ,. I • Discussion followed regarding Iminim uaand maximum requirements, justifications ents t, justifications for approving exceptions and compromises the applican Ff ° would make. ' c ,, pp. rave • ,Commissioner Edin moviyd. and Commissioner Owens seconded to. a SCE '5-83,,� changing ,'te height from 24'2"` to 22'' and ,permitting the 100 'sq. ft. for each side. ,h YY I Moban carried by unanimous vote of Co m�} ssi n, ers ;pLese Lt 5 2 COMPREHENSIVE 'ELAN AMENDMENT CPA 18-83: ZONE CHANGE ZC` 14-83 RUS E I I' I i - I KRUEGER NPO # 7 I I 1 A request by Russ Xrueger to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use . I Map and the Zoning District Maputo relocate a Neighborhood Commercial. designation from the west side of 155th Avenue, south of tax lot 100, to the northwest corner of tax lot 1000 alot,'g' 135th Avenue. ,I I {, • Assistant Planner Skorney made staff's recommendation for approval. that Director Planning f anDeV�e�.:o went Monahan n comment.d the staff ( I • was committed to !initiate the Com rehensive Plan Amendment for the ;. I I � p Commercial Neighborhood designation. • T ,-NFO COMMENT), � Richard Boberg, Cai'rp�rt n I fo stated 7 . tYeY had never beennotifed of the application. Diacuss.orifollawed. s, ,' � . � AtpLICANT'S PRESENTATION � Ryan O'Brian was present to answerany ,.. question for the applicant. I I a Discussion followed regarding the Road alignment, traffic study and . the hearing giveNPO opportunity I I continuing � �n` to the pp to re"view. I � ' PUBLIC 1iEARING. CLOSED i age . ' pl.�z+it�l�IG COMMISSIONM1N1�TE8" �+��,�lunr. ;� .1984 p. .".M»..xx .•x...u.u,;.::".„.r.1�..1: .,".,., „! ,,.._:r4 x?u,axnr,!_u,:..r+ry":.w,.ea}�lahn"ud'4',u.ry.►Yw ...+.. „�1 »ai.P! 'yr, HMM%f ,ww>a.•a } W � � • 4 =*..•r n, Pa ., ,. .'++ r t ,a.. 4�.a i..+r,:7 .x. w a • s V' ,. • •r• .�^r,�....r. Y 'y�Yr fix ":,ie • rI s i o Commissioner Butler moved. and Commissioner Nanderwood, to continue CPA. ,:e • 18--83 and. Z i4- u ,til' the' February •meeting to allow the, present. ,.,» ,.. ,• , ai�•+x r' :r' "",.,41'.,.'71t'",S - "«a , ' 7,+. •�h*a'>,i`•r•e p�.r �!��. tiY ue. to ��''eview the . ♦ N♦,'y •�Y. ''n.:1,�• ♦µ * w"x", r,' a�,iNt •w*,,..♦i;”w ; Motion carried,,by unanimous vote Y of 'Commissioner ;presents a f • n • 4 5.3 MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT 0S 9-83 BOND, PARK., II ,• , A request byWaverly Construction to modify the street alignment in x the approved preliminary plat for Bond Park II. Located at SW 79th near Durham Road.' , II o Assistant Planner Skarney` made staff's recommendation for, approval with conditions. o CCI' NPO Comments is No ©net appeared e orad toP I speak.. o o APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION - Bill McMonagle, 85305 SW Commerical, representing theapplicant explained how a purchase I had occurred which would enable'' them to. construct Bond Park Phase III at.d they I needed the road alignment'. ita,,,,:,d.'Lfica.tion to make through ,streets. , , • PUBLIC TESTIMONY , o Dorothy Gage, questioned the alignment of the street. , Assistant Planner Skorney reviewed alignment to Mrs. Gage, s satisfaction. CROSS E)(AMINATION1 AND REBUTTLE estreets ,` length of e th atti.d where o Commissioner ;;Butler q,uestiaxied the g the streets would come Out. Applicant reviewed map of phase III, indicating proposed s:treets, 'stating the streets would be approximately 300 feet and would eventually enter onto Rall Blvd. i; I o , .x PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED I ; o Commissioner Edin asked if the applicant had any problems with th;: condition to improve SW 79th. Applicant stated, no, as this was , ' originally a condition for Bond Park . �y +� S� I s ry{}TT �+�r � AND:. ACTION COMM SSION bI SI.yUs010 I I n Coma � ota. tr dd deal for aPPovalfor madifi anon of nppro�ed ,Preliminary Plat S 9-83 based on staff's findings and recommendation. " r ion carried d hyunnimous Vote,of Commissionerspresent. Il , ,I U SS • 6.� OTHER � S �l`E II . � rand f eoricernin future, �, o Di:�crissi.on foli.owed between. Uox�., tssione staff g � staff 'reports and 'presentations' information submitted to the 4 ?1artuirig,:'Commission. and the need for a Plan-tang ng Commission 'workshop;. PLANtlItit COMMIES IO fi MI1IiTES January 3- 1984 rage' P ; • • I , NOTICE OF PUBLIC ' HEARING , , I I I II • Notice is hereby given that the Tigard. Planning Commission, at its ` meeting on Tuesday, January � �984 at 7o30P.Mr �n'the lecture room m of Fowler Junior High School, 10865 S.W„ Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, will ° consider' the following application: II F I,F MBER. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 1$- 83 I NU I ZONE gHANC,E ZC 1 -83 Ryan 0 Brien Y ' I Russ Krueger til I ' ' II , I ' vII REQUEST: iTo amend the Comprehensive Plan tand Use Map and,lithe the ZJning District Map to ,11 1 relocate a' Neighborhood Commercial designation from the west side of 135th j Avenue, south of tax lot' 100, to the northwest', corner of tax lot 1000' along 135th Avenue. I I , 1. I i a I , Washington' County Tax 281x.,ap �� 4E tax lot.±01; and iS�., �3C tax lot, 1000. I I, I• , See map on reverse side} I I I The public hearing on this matter will be conducted iTl accordance with, the rules of procedures of the Planning Ct ili ission.' Any persons having interest in this ratter 'may attend'and be Iheard, or testimon� may submitted'in1 , lay.. , �.tirig to be entered into the record of the initial hearing. I ' Should'you wish� tQa� al� a wr tt.xi �etter adoresr,4� tcthe CityFeccr demust be received prior to the expiration of the fife :.nth day after t ci deoist ri o I /f riotioe to appeal s,not received with fifteen days, the action ' the hear�ngw � � ► valid. I 1 t - For er info t�.o. le �. �.. �' r � th rm gar r� Please 'contact the R�.arindsrag 1�ep `tment at �3� � �" TIGARID. CITY l L4, 1Z"7S5 S.W., Ash Avenue (Corner of Ash Avetitle St, .Buthhaftt Street) "Ns i I I f I I + " .'Citi,.. " ciN „„.,,,,4„,,,,,,_,,,, �� .""" � ;, r + �D y. }dry., .,, . , , ,.:. ,. ... ., 01.,„ ./.......,-,—..-.. , . .,„ , , f . '/ a r_ ' ;'.-. , . , ,., .-- ,, ., ,,,,,. „,,..,,,,,,,'„,,,,,,:., ;„ ,, ' lir, , .' . ,,. . H. , ',. • , , ' ., ,, ,.. .:i . L ` i ti r / T�•y t f 11 , ' , ' ' ' 7 „ , , . , ,, ,, , ,,,,, ,,,,,,. , . ,,,,,,,,,, .. .. , . „ .. . „ . .„,. , ,,, .,,.,, ,,„, .: . , ., „ , . , ,, ,. , ,,, .. , ..,,,,,, , „ ,„ .„,, , . , ., , ,, ,, ,, , . : , .. . ., ,,,, , ,, r ,,, :. . , , . , .,r, ,,rr,,,, ,,,,,,:,. .,,,,,,,,,:.r., r. 7 SrII ,. . ,,,,,.. ,/, ., ,..r , .f „ , . ,..„ „, . . . .,,. ., .,, , .„. . ./ . . ,,: , • / . .. .. . ,,; , , „„, , 'I:i,• t (t,,Itt,t,ISi . . , ...i.„.: ., ,. ,,,„„,.. ,,•• , , , , : , ,,,, r: f,. ,.,.. .... 'iu i,�m,€„„.n=nfi.ll� qtt: t «tl'f� x �f � /. , !svtr:{ n„kiliK n„, i ,.'.,, �y ,p `li,„„ l,,iii•lSti�IIt ' " t, ,- Y ” ` II f { ii1imiiittli1i3 ijiiii<'4i / Atl.( t. ittt1it' , pJ '11II+I t� ,i .. , ,• -/ f ''''s>'' ' cr2tr Y '. '1' : ' ' ' ,' , ,'', 'if''' :::' '':; ,',,,'' ,''f,' :.-'”,f,:':,''''''”:''''.:,.,r,.,',.,.'''' '''''l.1 hta : '.'' .',''' ',., :,- ..,' / l l ;l / / `''‘'t''' ' ;.44- '"' al '4 1 / Jt+-oF,,� }u B. rttrr*f� P 7 i ;,./.",'.: ( ,,I.' / r, ; ✓� � �Y tI l�`��t�t�'t�rYx qtr.rt{i;: f, l u/ l -. 1 t:�Ifr Ii lh t i t'1 1 3 e: l N.i. int ,4ti I I" (/! �/ / }��r�t''rrlllr.znl��xri�'7�� .r 'l li �t StK It fit P 911, .i , l / IIj111111��••• r 1 zi r Pq Fy?li r T1 �t ., .,,, i. !,., , ' .; i ma ,,., „ ....,,,,,,,,i,,,.. " ter,,.. / a • • y" 9� a, r t IL,. - w n,-+w,.n......w,.......u..,...+«+,:..w..,-,+..........» .,..b_�.. n...» ._.....,� ...��,i.�:...r.4..,..-._n:. -- '...�,....' -..-..++....,M.aw..-.iw,+.,... AFFIL AVIT OF PUBLICATION .. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE STATE OF OREGON, ass The following will be considered COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, by the Tigard Planning Commission on January 3, 1984 at 7:30 P.M. at " Fowler junior High School Choir being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Room, 10865',SW Walnut,;Tigard, Ore- Director, or his principal clerk, of the_..».Til and Times gon. Further information may be ob- " a newspaper of generai circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 tamed from the Director of Planning F and 193»020; published at _ » 7"%gard in the and Development,at 12755 Sw Ash.41v- aforesaid county and state;that the w enue,Tigard,Oregon,9"/223 or by call "6 arfile Nora�^e . ins 639-4171. a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, ws published'in',the 5,1 SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 5-83 entire issue NPO � of said newspaper for , 1, successive and A request fora Sign Code E�.cep- €io to allow installation of a 100 consec; ctve in the following issues: squVre,foot per face free-standing sign (to replace an axisting 9'x19'sign).Lo- .4 Dec22, 19.83I cated at the Chalet Restaurant, 11680 p.... Pacific Highway. • 5.2 tea COMPREHENSIVE LAN ' '' A AMENDMENT CPA-' ;18 831 RUSS KRUEGER NPO#*7`ZONE CHANGE , r ' i ft ei t (,� A request ZC 14-83, Russ q by , Krueger to , Subscribed and s to before me th Is" D:gra,n i! a amend the Comprehensive Pl°n / � 't:Tse Map and°the Zoning Dish► c.�,ap �L. •"'"-, L?, ;'"-�'''�®' to-relocate a Neighborhood Commer,- -._ ;�i cial designation from the`west side of Notary Public for Oregon 135th Avenue, south of tax lot 100, to the northwest corner of'tax lot 1.000 my C'o msnission l"'xpir 3/J,6,187 u , along 135th�ivcnue 5.3 MODIFICATION TO AN AP- AFFOr)AVIT 'PROVED83NPO:�PRELIMINARY� PLAT S 9W 1 > I A request to modify the street alignrlent in the approved prelimi- , nary plat for bond.Park IL Located at SW 79th near Durham Road. TT'6009--Publish December 22, 1983 • I I II I � r` I' • i. I I ( I I I , is ' t ti . S I J I I ,r-..ti.—«..... r.s. 'i,l I i . i g er I I 'u I II r � I 4 I I I r �y ,1114 / 2/ r 4 a I r , 1 . ' 1 1 ... , ...-,1 L..) ......, , ,,..1—,,, ,_,,,, 6'6 ,,,, 11 I r I I4 I r I P r 'r i , ,,e.,,,,,,,,e..,,,,,ei,,,,,,, .2,,,t I 4. I _ t I I M >R '' war 1 , r, d I x dl, p L,44 ,t,, 001".**e.:./4/ ,,,:ii''64-4 i 11 , 1 , w I I 7 11 I ;� h I 1 I I r • I f , I I I I li 1k _ I I I i I I r ,. Ir 6 e. l 4 ' \' °A INGTO COU :� I BUILDING- 150FIRST AVENUE . ADMINISTRATION N. N I ; ' -iii �i®®�.�■ '� '41, MILLSBORO,OREGON 97123 _.,..,/..........„,) PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS , c 1 b'i/ES MYLLENBECK,Chairman (5031 548761 I • ' BONNIE LHAYS,Vice hair 9 n EVA M.KI LLPACK JOHN E.MEEK LUCI LLE WARREN December 29, 11983 �� '.-,. /71i'' i' f'L"''-, /I Ryan O'Brien �' Planning Consultant' 1134 S.'E. 24th Avenue �1 JN' ' G b Hi l 1 sboro, Oregon 97123 k.P RE: RUSS KRUEGER PLAN AMENDMENT , I I Dear Ryan O'Brien ` This letter is in response to your: letter of December 21 , 1983. Richard ''''• ! Meyer is out of st?te for the hol i days, so I am responding to your question. ; , The location of the Neighborhood Commercial area on 135th Avenue, as shown on' the ''adopted' Bull Mountain Ct)mmuni ty Plan Map, i s intended to be determined by the location of the proposed Murray Road extension. As you know, the ' 7 loCaation of this extension has not been decided as yet. Until that location is knovwtii,i t cannot be known whether the relocation'? of the Neighborhood ., w r'north conforms to the' Bull Mot!''til n Plan.about 1400 farther Commer coal areay It would,therefore p .,. the land use Fore i. appear to issue be somewhat premature ��reeosaoni n this vicinity , i r question until the large o F the Murray Roadxt n is resolved. ' 9, 1984. Ifyou' have anyuest `ons before �� Richard will� b� returning January 9 then, please call me at 648-8717 i� A. ' Sincerely,i4f 41 ''' . La.rr Svart Associ ate Planner LStMBM ct Wi l`Ii ate Mo ah'han,. Pi ann ng Director • City c'f Tigard' I I I 1 I : a 1 I a I I j I 1 I r I' I I I I' 1.1 I ' an i:1" f1al Otle1tr1` 4'1)11)10,1'0r" . I „, -.t•la n ai.. a,n .gal AI.,Uaw.ww„„,i Ni�,. .i. ,., '.:,,I., ,. . ..I, ,. .,.w�•,«K...«....,.;... t mow. r , ..tai I I i 7 III rvr,. {p�'�'' C'a,L FA1�.A J. V 1'Jt'L,4 � I � I i S Lt OF ORECC`N ) �v of Washington Countyi , I I I . � • City of Tigard ) ' 6 vti 32 4 ,� des se. '� I "'G� on oath first' a rn I being I, `,a duly and say. I I � I I I "1.Q I, ral.. I , ��'t�at I' am a � . . I the City of Tigard, Oregon' ' of'theand o f hearing •• That I served noticeg Planning Cssion of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) n each the following naffed persons cri the 2 3' day of of ` 198; , by nailing to each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Narked Exhibit 8) , said notice as hereto attaehhed, desited irl, the',United States Nail on the 7.�, day of �y a c 983 , postage Prepa.i.d w I j L ; S cri d arid sworn to be f ore ire on the, �� day of a 'tom 1 ,.. . P r 1983 pan .' . ,f-t, x p t,,,,- I ' i i j '7;, ,, 0, ,ili,,i,,,,,e ."4 '7 t' ' di ..-.,,,t,„,.., ' ' _„,,,-.,,s. Ny.. • El3Bra.0 OF OREGON+N , a i ” CotirniSsion moires t, I.,, ?"„-,FI i � I � A t i i I I it I 1 i , I i II f s .i I :III i 1 I «.nr*«« .w..,.,ryl+w .`iX "..s`w+."l':.-.r� ., ..,.,,. ,tv,. .. .a,> s.w�.:a•.aiu�ax,.s.a • RYAN 0 B IEN PlanningConsultant 1134 S.E4 23rd Ave, Hillsboro,Oregon 9712 3 � (503) 64 8- 061 I I , 1 • ' .usu- ,,.. ..a .4,.:•..v ..,,.+I'a tl .0 ,.. cl,. ,rea,,na'7�,. ,n,,ar +y ,.r.; <o;, t .n,... ,.. ,ti, ,.,ap.,.. •v v,,.. 1 .,., .n..a ,, 'ry ..�r:, _i.an I <, ` I ; Ric - rd Meyer December 21 , `'1 983 Was in tan County Plar ring Department 150 O. 1st Ave. t( i Ha}rlsboro Oregon n 7 123 I 1, Subject: Russ Krueger. Plan Amendment , a �. • Dear R ch 1 r As you may recall our phone con,serya. t o n a coupleI of` weeks ago, • • you indicated that relocation of the commercial arerL from I' the south- east portion of the property to, the northeastern . union could occur in the County Plan if the ,Murra.r .y extention Is approved as I we have proposed. You further indicated, that. this relocation could 4`I occur with out a formal application. to Washington County, because. y I the Plan i s . l exabl e enough to allow ;-o occur : to discuss this ' commercxal relocationowithecth �' g We are schedulede , �xga Plann�n goinu��sszon on i, , 19.84. An amendmenttothe Tigard Comprehensive Plan was inz tyted by the PlannngCmission at Itheir last' meeting. At this time, I a m requesting ,a letter from youto verify that my understanding of the`'Coun° y t.s position is correct. If do not receive any 'comments from you, I will assume r th at you a , I gx�e with the co�.te��ts o,f this letter. . • L 'youI ` If have any question,an, � e s.ei give in a call. Thank,vou advance for your consieration of this matterw ,, I i . - I I i cert e I a c t 1u s s,'` Cru e �,Krueger a.n 01 ri en I ll ptonohan, Cit of T1%gard I I r-'' •, , .. e r nle s 4, r. i .a. 's, .+ ,t v, a,l +' ,.. i ..,n_. of • • RYAN BRI r_N Planning Consultant A 1134 S.E. 23rd Ave. ® Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 0 (503) 6648-4061' ,G1, cT:¢'?t, .m «.k.rsGn ,<tn .,4u,x^.4lt u,•'..i4 r•U,. t 7.•. ,.1 .. 7 To' City of Tigard Planning Commission and Caty Council. l. , M•` I Date: December 20, 1983. Subject: Plan Amendment fo,r. Russ Krueger; Tax Lot 1?01 : 2S1 -- .B and g Map � _. Tax Lot 1000, Map 1S1 -33C INTRODUCTION, The subject property contains 105 acres and the area of consideration is 3. 5 acres. This application .s a request to relocate a 2, to 4`acre neighborhood commercial site from tax lot 101 to the northeast corner • of tax lot 1000. This relocation is intended to comply with a Proposed realignment of 135th Avenue with. Scholls Ferry Road. This application has been submitted at the request of the Washington County Planning I and Public Works Departments. Public hearings will occur soon on the 135th Avenue. LID. Washington County Staff felt that a determination on the proPer location of this commercial 'land should occur prior to those hearings. Otherwise, the hearing process may have some conflicts. Washington County Planning Department staff feels that a Countyl` Plan ' Amendment is not necessary, as the Plan text indicates that this , commecil Property is required to b e located at the intersection of :; • 135th Avenue and the n.ew east, west street which connects Soholls Ferry Road and 13th Avenue. They indicated that if the street alignment proposed in this application s accepted by the City and the County, that • the relocation of the commercial land use designation to the northeast corner of tax lot 1000 will automatically occur without: further actio'e • by the County. , JUSTIFICATION A traffic study was prepared by Bob Keech at considerable expense to . identify alternative locations of this new east/west collector street Keech ':.s report indicates that the proposed alignment is the best native considering the location of property lines, property ownerships, existing landtases in t1,e area proposed` land uses, existing and proposed *' rw local streets, topography, functional desilgn, sight dis .,ance, and anticipated year 2000 traffic' volumes. 'T'hi.s report , ncicates a need. for a signal at the intersections of Scholia Ferry' Road and 135th Avenue. • I This report also ['identifies- the location of th'e commercial site at the intersection'. Of Sohollal Ferry Road instead 'of 135th Avenue, , The Scholia location is the first choice of the applicant. otever; a rover by the . i I rl I 1 I It, I 1 I • L d1.+ { • • • {J 6 Page 2 I Russ Krueger Plan Amendment • Washington County PlanningDepartment shows that such a choice would) be in conflict with their Comprehensive Plan. With withl this information "y in mind, the applicant chose the 135th Avenue site. The main reason for this proposed commercial location is the identified' traffic signal at the 135th Avenue intersection. Other considerations 1 include the 4% grade at the current location. Also, this new location is more centrally located by a larger population base.) ' Only 'a limited amount of new development will probably occur on Bull Mountain south of the applicant property. The current site would have some '.sight distance and grading problems. Also, substantially more expensive and extensive cuts and fills will be necessary to make the new east/west road property line up i with 135th Avenue at the current location. The proposed location is •more` appropriate because the land is almost flat. COMPLIANCE WITH THE�iE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN * Coordination with Washington County This has and will occur. x Neighborhood Commercial Concentration of small conamorcial and per- ''.1 sonal service uses for daily shopping and related needs of nearby { residents. CitizYen Involvemerrit - This will be available through the notification. and d hearing process Natural Features and Open Space - The property is n,,'t identified for open space preservation and contains no unique natural features in need of preservation Physical Limitations' and Natural Hazards None are located on, the • Property- * Air, Water, and Land Resource Quality Air pollution will be cut by closer proximity of commercial uses to residential. No i' �mpacts to water and land resource quality are anticipated. Y I * Economy y - applicationThis an. d land development will help improve and diversify the econot y of the state. rl Housing This application will have no effect on housing opportunities: • L I r Public Facilities and Services - They are all available. Transportation a This application will have 'positive I,1effect on the Tigard Transportation System. It will help .. implement, the itriprovementI oi'' 135th Avenue and the proposed new' east/r est street co nneotion o,f I Soholl s Ferry Road and 135th Avenue, 4 II rl I !I I 1 1 - J LtLwwmLW16 4.aJW1A+.41 tJu MJYf4 ran xiu+.r': r I • "y I I r , Page 3 Russ Krueger Plan Amendment e , * Neighborhood Planning�n� Organization No. 3 The 1975 Tigard Plan " opposed a proposed Murray Boulevard Extention through NPO #3 to Gaarde and Pacific Highway. The City and residents., felt it should , be located onthe west side of Bull Mountain to relieve local 4 streets. The policies and implementation strategies of the 1983 Tigard Plan indicate the following: A. The Cityshall work with other bodiesdevelop an governmental to, ',. arterial street system on the west side of Bull Mountain between Murray and Pacific Highway which does not go through existing residential neighborhoods. B. Gaarde and 121St shall be 2 lane roads. THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE The intent of this zone is to allow cluster stores for convenience goods ` which are bought frequently and which do not involve comparison shopping. These uses include corvenience markets, beauty shops, barber shops, and repair shops. Thi uses are intended, to service a limited trade area. No use is permit ped to have a gross floor area over 4, 000 square feet. Hours of operation are limited to 7:00 am to 10:00 pm, unless a conditional use permit is approlted COMMENT The subject property is intended to be developed with a grocery store and other shops and uses over 40000 square feet in area. Therefore, g YGeneral Commercial Commercial devel- opment variance, a. zone change to or a opment plan in conjunction with a PUD will be submitted to the City in the, future. A Grocery Store Market y y prepared for Was submitted Citytosthe cfor } w � ��` This �' review Washington Count This study w s m with this application. This study indicates that 5.24 square Feet , r Of groce y Store floor area is needed per person. Therefore, to accomodate a 20, 000 square foot' grocery store en. the s site, a Pop - lation:' of 3800 to 4000 people is necessary. If the applicants property is developed at an average density of 15 units per acre, about 1 500 housing units` or a population of approximately 3000 people will occupy just the appl� cants prope.� Substantiallyt�: more population o pan the range of 3000 to 4000 more peoplewill be available in the, immediate area . This level of population is more than adequate to support a ' 20, 000• OCC squa� � footgrocery store on the subject pro erg t Y The ' mtach ed mapshows the general area and other proposed and existingcommercial shopping cente sites 4 This proposed site defin .telt' does not, on liet "' with these other sites i f gg4 r 4 a r :1 , 1 tVFr-1 1,1 :4 a ' 1.3 '41'. 1!M rl 1 } ''' I«x/.,.aro,t. ` a•tca. • , w: r r I t t,r 0 i r . ° .i ,1 \ d 1 . Ir r t .0 s a I i! ,% r x ./�, jla'. I I r ,�•, d . 6I: .. ''',,,,.„.i,--".' 1 /wr µlm • 1 I + Vii, r ' •,. - ,_,,,:,,•.., ...,"'''''' �,r ' 1 'vt- is ..'''-1.. - II ti�.-I ; . « f . ' , I • tr• E 3 I Ila •.� �I /r-- ------ ANCUY �a i �-« 'I • r ' rr � �1r � Cr�t J �. )S r V. i . , \` ✓ � X00/• .. } �rl r it � r:'n , • •. ki •tw • w J/ Y x _ %-, , f. / AR8a TO BE ' I 1 l',;*'' + ANNEXED r m m 1 Q 'i /, C ' x .r..e- / I 0 1f+?C I q I v" 106 I I. 47:. �. . � . ,' Yrs :: '' . 102 ) . w .,/ �,/o ,V1/9 J8rrTtON C , r ,"4.f..,'.." w �,'.- �VV" .•max' I , JF !@!@ xrl 5f X4 jS1 Iw : F II I I / I I � � I I � '` "` ,'F��kYiM��liikltfittI�tltiltdkat�YY�1kMik6111CiYklYrkiiiiNk�ktxitilkpkIei,*tiJ,,iiY "'",iit1%LiA11'"tb '*** I j U (, I I I I lil II I `la ' I r riI1,,,,IlY l U t r.�' Of C d/ p L' ,'" ,/,!,,,t,,i, w x • • • • • P • •• • • • • , C e MPF'e.' ' ' ' A -T or( cf l'f16Atit'el:::) -. • ,/ ., , . • , . . .... ... ... . ... . \ 1 ... 1 i; I '3.5 -Gla,titureuvv \' / I , / ; \----- 7— -- -,s...,:,..,,,.., , . . .,..,. .,,',. r . ` �, ''' \ ,~''\' 1 . V N,.....7 i 2 ,, i A 1. ..... —., t pe..(2..,tf,,,. , • ' wy: w�t�' ♦ r .. . . 1 , 2._ / /� ,,dao 441 q ^ .I ,,. - 1., 1,4 --,,, 1 1.., '' ' / • t077 r 'a �1 iI ray ,�,ry{, �tia�n'''.....` ��y, �L 4 710 I 4, ,,,,,,, , , ,,,, M 'yv' 4 i i 1, f 'I' j I ' A r �� t� > "I 1 1 I err �.�, Irl«r,r,� w. .J.y� w�+a"w.rw.ube'ww.r.•w+r. .♦ . b . , 1, • L • a • TFC/. . . ,,, . •.... , , . .. . . . ., , • r P,, I ,, 0 • , I I I • r I I i I ,• I; • Planning Consultant '. ' • , 1134 S.E.�. 2 r Ave. 1Ni Hillsboro, Oregon 971231 �5Q3 b 8-4C 1 I c I I • r ,i. t 'I w II . I 19 8 3 ,, Bill Monahan,, ' Director of Planning 'November �it', � . 1 C ty of Tigard l.', P.O. Box 23557 I ' �, 2 'w+ �Tigard, Oregon 97223 I +x , •w I M� I - . , :, Dear' Mr. Monahan, . On behalf of Russ Krueger and the other ;property owners of 105 acres of land west of' 135th Avenue and south of Scholls Ferry Road, we are requesting the . relocation of a neighborhood commercial designs,tion from the west side of 135th Avenue, south of tax lot 100, to the northeast corner of tax lot 1000 along 135th Avenue. As you may recall we discussed this, location before. When the zoning„ was awdopted for this property by the City of Tigard City , ` Council, we indicated uncertainty over the exact location of the commercial ,ti' property because of transportations marketing, aesthetic and topographical in 'e reasons. Now that we are much further along the planning process and the .. 35th 'Avenue LID process, we have amuch better idea on the' best location I w for this' commercial property. Our proposal is shown by the attached maps. As 1 you may recall, you indicated that the Planning Commission would initiate a plan amendment for this property in the future.. The City/County UTPAA specifically states that the Tigard/;Bull Mt. plan can be amended by cooper- . ation between the. City and County Planning Directors. We did not intend to ` process this Amendment at such an e.aa.lI date„ aowev'er, we feel that it ,is important to resolve the location rf tills commercial property 'prior to public, hearings on the 135th Avenue LID. i � „' We havereviewed the. 135th Avenue alignment and the proposed lacatinn of the - ' commercial property, and they are in general agreement. Washington County staff requested that more specific street alignments be, prepared for the inw , terior of the ,site. They also ,requested close attention to the IPolicies of I I � I � i � I I 1 the Comprehensive] Plan,; especially, the significant natural. resources, natural 1 drainage and the transition between the 6 to 19 'and 1,6' to 24 unilts I per acre area. The area proposed for 6 to 9 units per acre and the propose hyo trig e'y� ... ,,yr p balance� i b;L.. � �: U V '�� units 1.� �'per�' I 1, d t�o.Cll ill ti..,4"'" 1 r . area �- acre � l is shaded. p e' is iir shaded. I cea.e expectCort• rehen i _... The �. 24 � p ~�;o fully Go�npl y �ri.th 'those' Comprehensive Plan 'Policies.' tI At this, time t# e would like to specifically recj ,es a I plan arttendtment in accor,- :1' I dance with the attached maps. If you need a iy further I±nfcrration, I "" do cu. �en tation or 0 u.sti.fi.cati.on in order toprocess� this amo dr en.t, please' give me i +' a call ' I I ' I I I I` o ,( I ,I „ Sincerely, cc. Richard MeMeyerer , ' I Bass Krueger I tiiw t y ( I v 1 I I 11;•' �r MM'IM� � � v++f�� M . S., t ' -I .. .` - � ..1 ., r. - .�i_,.„„" .....-:;-r� rm..,.....:»...y«.... ,.�y, ,,..., . H .w..w�a.:r;rY• Y ,. - .,i v " .in,r i w r w I tip. I. I I I I i I - RYAN O'BRIEN ' P anni n 4.J) 9 n.� ant 1134S.E, 23rd AVe. o F Fillisboro,,Oregon 97123 0 (503) 648-4061 ' ri I , I • SUPER MARKET SHOPPING CENTER STUDY FOR EAST WASflI'NGTON COUNTS ' November 2, 1983 „ I • PURPOSE OF REPORT was r This report� prepared for the following reasons : . . 1 . To document the building square footage and location of super , markets in East Waw hinton County. 2. To document the acreage of existing, propose& and potential 1 supermarket shopping centers. 3. To document, existing and year 2000 population. I 4. To determine the square footage of supermarket floor area which • '{ serves the existing population of East Washington County. 5'd; To project the size and location for fut. re supermarkets and '- supermarket shopping centers in East Washington County to sreve ,. year 2000 population a r fi T 1" ... �• GENERATED NF�RI ._W�Jn Exhibit "A" is a chart .which shows the 39 existing supermarkets in #, Washington County. Exhibit ttBHH shows the "'1 5 proposed or potential supermarket situs, in East Washington County. Other s_tpermarket sites • are possible through redevelopment or new development of commercial land adjacent to existing supermarkets. , These 1 5 sites were eh.osen , , fof their physicalPaFofrom existing stpexmarkets. Exp hibit Ct shows census tracts with 19S0and year 2000 o - ulat :o n . ATS this information is shown on an East Washington p �ton County Map. This map shows the general location areas where new supermarkets are needed. a,i"NALYSTS OF INFORMATION The existing' Urban Ipoptllation of East Washxngton GoIuri tyis IOo 1,},��. The year 2000 population is expected to increase .1214360 , too a total of 327,1825.. Currently) 1 )0S , 0O ua 'e feet=: of ;'supermarket floor ; at a' serves this'Ypopulation with' ratio of 524 square' /`oat per ' .e 'soratio is verysi tnu Yar I _ „ for, � ratio �, ,to the 4.88 square feet per person Bio e area around ,the 01±.,j, f tillsboro (population o' ;0.4 280 at or the 1 .I and, t'ap eraret floor 'area of 1 4I) 700 squarepoet . I t is • ,' w R. ....,R+.>tn+m.u•r+wq.µwuM .,,...,.,...„„ w...+•...+ .. .:aww. J7 ..... '" , .. saw t , w r Page Supermarket S ud Study Assuming this ratio remains constant for the next 20 years, approxi- mately 636 000 square feet of, supermarket floor area will be required to serve year 2000 population needs. If new stores average 30, t0 square feet, about 21 storeses will need to be built. A population of approximately 5800 people i$ required • • to serve a 30, 000 square .soot; store.; Exhibit 1TBT' Thaws 15 potential sites. However, some of these sites' may ,not support a supermarket, Of. Si2,e.,or location. s ' c s, ;1 r ! These; sites: arernoo = �•3, 52• & , �}�; This l.e�ves. � 2°� .te�, to supply the year 2000 need 'for supermarkets. To fill this need, a few more neighborhood commercial sites w11 probably be 'added.' by the City and Washington ' County during the current plan update process. Also, a few more., sites1 will' be developed `in the cer}tral business disc tricts' close to existing supermarkets. The major growth areas where • these sites will be designated are in north Hillsboro, East Hillsboro/ Aloha. The Sunset Corridor, Aloha south of Farmington Road, and the Tigard, Tualatin, and Sherwood areas. Exhibit ti It shows that thestores average bout 28 ,000 s uar > feet e t r ' with a general range of 20, 000 to 40, 000 square feet on 5 to, 10 acres ' of `land. ' The trend for the newer stores has been" X35, 000 to` I..C., 000 • on sites containing acres. Sites smaller than • `' I s pare, feet � znin� 7 to � 0 ' � •' q e 7 acres have been developed recently, ` but only because the' local gov- • erriment agency has limited the size of the center. !r . I . • CONCLUSION p • , C There is a demo�a.str�.ted, need. for a few more neighborhood commercial sites in East Washington County. ` Specific growth areas have been d. area that Eachg � population 'growth of about i ! identifiewill have a' 6000 people by the ;ear 2000 will need 'a supermarket with a; floor area of 30,1000 square f et. The newer' centers tend to be larger in size if with larger supermarkets. I I I. I I i I i I i I I t I I � • « Y ., ., .. w+ww m,wyµ„.>,«w a,+,.,w,......,•..4w,o,.....r w .,i .:a t,Lu.i - , �Y M • _. $ t 7wuxLL � , 4 ,d•4 `. .r EXHIBIT 11A It • , Supermarket Shopping Center Sites • Source o e t " v` yts a a .. our Phone in e� �.ews and phi �c �. .ase surments Site No.'' Name of Supermarket Gross Square Acreage of and Location Feet of Super-- Shopping market Floor Oertter 1 Safeway, }tillsboro 25,000 3.60 �-• '2 Hillsboro IGA 1 7000 0.80 • 3 f•Ianks Thrftwa y , Hillsboro 1 5,'000 1.33 y • 4 Albertsons, Hillsboro 27,000 3.32 IWaremart,''Hill sboxro 46,700. ii 8;89 , Union 0. 5.00 " 7 West 80 Au ' 8 Tanasbarne Sal'ewe• 34,20021.919 1 9 Baseline Thrif''tway, Aloha 24,E 000 5 1 5 •• 10 Safewa , Aloha' 28,700 6.34 11 A1bertson sAloha 12 000 .. 0 6 12 Farmington Thriftway 27,000 26.79 13 Sal away, Cedar Hili 23,700 13.16 14 Ideal Sentry, Cedar Mild 10,000 1.07 1'5 Bales Thriftway, Cedar Mill 26,500 4.92 16 Ernie s s Walker ltd. Thriftway, ' • 1 ,Beaverton 680 0 ' 1'7 Aibertsons, Beaverton 29,000 19.57 • 18 Food Warehouse, Beaverton 28'400 36.59 19Safeway, Ber vexrton 8 000 3.09 I3 20Prairie Market, Beaverton 18,000 2.04 , '; .z ',51, 21 Fred Meyer, Beaverton 50,000 38.11 • 2 WestSlope T r��tway 11 ,800 3,36 23 Fred Meyer, Raleigh' Hills 40,800 19,.36 24Gsaremart} Beaverton 0,600 8.08 , r ' 25 .Naps IGA, Beaverton 26,000 3.14 • u i 0 oa,ve t � �, 00 10.77 26 Keil s B o � 2 lbsertettrts Beaverton 42,000 4.01 •' 28 Grocery Sae ICA, Beaverton, 16,800 5 29 $cholls Perry Thriftway, Tigard 40,000 11.42 30, Prod Meyer, Tigard 29,300 12.65 31 Safetiay, Tig rd 32,800 8.26 ( , 32 A1bez't,oras ,Ti...al+td 29,000 'n ` .. '3 rood Warehouse . Tigare.j 17,(:)(:10 1.56 • a Market,�34 �r Prairie 1 arket TIard. 22,000'1 1.83 '' 35 Tigard Thhrf tttay , 25 000 1, 6.84 i 36 z��w sro � Store, Ple8 0lty 20,700 15.07 7 , 1 ,u; 37TProd Meyer, Tualatin 35,000 , 15.58 8 T tr t• way, Tualatin 33,300 12.82,' 3 �� Thr3trrz ShetFwood 22 000 2 • ' TOTAL 1,082,t1o0, 34,27 , ' � 'settro", Feat aaraa I u ., ., , .• ,• , .:. ... ' a.xMarr n � •{ • • •1 0 ...,,✓"..�nr,rN..,, ...'4" -apn.,.n hin,,r •ut ., :1, w...wr.+w„ 111 • I •; 4 1 ,k I EXHIBIT "B tr I �' ent a r„ �. Il Supermarket Shopping Centers 1 , �• ua urce. I y ;� and County Comprehensive plan Maps. Site te No.. Location o r name of Gross w45(lu:are I Acreage of Potential Supermarket Feet c .� Super- shopping m rk4 c) t Floor a � �' Center Ares Site ' corner 40 I�r/Ecof239th & TVHwy, N/A, 7« 43 Hillsboro 41 N/W corner of 219th. & TV Hwy, N/A 19. 28 Al Aloha 412 `SSW cr�rner Of 21 nth & Base;?;.zner Rd. N/A• 10:1 Aloha, 43 N/Ecor�nerof205th & Baseline N/A Aloha 1 . C�Q 44 S/W corner of 185th & Su aset Hwy�, N/A 2 to 4 acres. x Aloha• r 45 N/W corner of 158t & Wafer Rd. , N/A 1 6. 00 ., Aloha 46 112th North of Sunset Hwy, N/A 20 plus t: I Cedar Mill 47 " '}`` Tzl t s S/E corner of TV Hwy & 1 98th, 45, 000 5. 7 Aloha 48 N/Tkr ` corner of Farniingtan Rd. & N/A 4. 77 154th, Aloha 49 N/E corner of 1 55th & Beard Rd, N/A 11 32' Beaverto 50 West of Murray' & North of PGE N/A 4 00 facility.* Beaver oon 51 135th & MurrayExtexnt ion, Tigard N/A 4. 00 52 East oorner of Old & New Scholl.o N/A 3. 001 Perry Rare, null Mt. 53 8/t corner of 1 65h & Hart Rd.,, N/A 2 45 \\; ha 54 N/tipeorFnor op -)0.i..11:61,1,, R . Jet 231st. N/A ,5 I �� y'� y�! ebo �' �..� .1 ':�; 'i ill r �r..4.A'♦ � r u 1 Y ..0 '• I � I I '^7",�•,�Y Note yy++G�� Only 1 afore t i. �� prop.00e . C 1 r , 1 i I I I • n � W • I •� 11011 �'XH.�DIT I • b a Population aen�lS Txct II I I ' 0 1 81 . I location Wor',ksh..p, 9 a 00 Gra w�'h Al e tr o _Y e x So'uxce. M •� I' � I L I I I . Censu s �raat 1 980 to 2000 year '2000 5 tsar , p°Pn,l population poptt�.�tion ancxe ase I _ ' I 'I g "301 586 4500, 617�J I b2 597 9' 200 II 82� -70 4752 0 ' • 3 3 � 513 3 ' Y ,► 304..01H3192.9_ 120 6 026 02 3390441 34 I � 974 I� 2640 30 ' 7109; 4948 ' 306 4108 84o 307 139,2 h 1 4 6 t� ' 2 1 5 368 ,7 0 1 o '6 3 t 01 37 • I 309 3563` `� 9001 I 0 31b.g1 8921 8889 ' a 0 2 88 1q, 9 .. .t 2291 / P 1' a �' I 311 225$6� -112 5369' 500 1 ; 5136 1430 33 6566 . • t. 9891 314.01 110271 -380 1 0 11138 314002�r a 1038 a , ;15.01. 1335 4500 � 35 '� " ; 8063 35Qn 1�563 � • . 31;5.02 ; 13573 b 8 3990 Y , s. • 31`S ` 18'1511 316.01. 434, �447 0 1.'. 7000 181;51 0 31'602�� I111 51 I � 317.01) 9603 2580 6277 3;'17 b2 4277 2000 1 337'' 318 ' 935'7 8980 803 6 r 31 9.01' 5782 3-• '� 10211: 1 :p 6828 33$0 520 6 7 0 1 3 071 ��20•��. �b28 �,.. 321.01 3028 6000 k , 321,02 1,.b 42 7852 323 2152 2722.. • 324 2r 10345 • 2000 Y b1 297'5 8070 j124.02. 11045 71 51 2 5111 2 80 3 6 326 12521 1, 16200 28721 ` 60 .32:782.5 b, 6, 1213 2 6 5 • S,8` , I I , I I � I • I it I i I I I I I I I , it x,y i.., ♦. .I. ..M• �li:`•. ' 1._ e •• .� `. 4 t' II ' t;+i'r.[ "2 Ili O, cic,r C() C:unii)I y L,i LL,!ut,ti i, yt ' " E:Xii I IR I I` A-33 (:1'11 i11 ! Iz.AIt1), tt,t.[.�ot, s' r kl:t,{ll.11'I 1t)1\ xd[r ", " L16/,1' ? '' A RE,SULU"1'ION E•`UR'I'19ER LNG ANNE:XA'I IUt' •1(i `I lII', CI'1'i of. 1 I(,t 1tl) ()I '1111:: 'I'L:RR J'I`OitY AS OUTLINED) IN EXHIBIT "A" AND DESCRIBED IN EXliIBI;'I "1S'' ATTACHED (78th b Pfgftie) ". a . *''' ',,,,'' WHEREAS, "consents" in the toriii c)t, a pet t icyri ltaut been presented to the City of Tigard ' requesting annexation of rertax[i tracts of land presently contiguous to the corporate limits ,of ,the City; and 1 • WHEREAS, the consents in the form: oaP etit ion were signed by the owners of said tracts of land; `and ,' ' , • ,'WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Council, has reviewed the consents and set the final 'boundary for the annexation:; as requi • o ,t01.) I .1 utc r—Dcp art at cut Carrespoutti ttc c` Dute October , 1,SC 1 I Russ Krueger, `Ryan G'Brien, Meyer, n Richard Mey T � J Robe/.t Keech and Frank Currie , I I I ; I � 4�rt, • Larr Rice Director of Pub 'c Wo s ,, r y � u 1 t � II I I i I I � I �;rue 9er Property, 135th LID, Murrayur� a� E,tEns Extension I I � I I I I I II I is I i I , IIis The smemorandumthe bed � 'resultsa e� ' p.�rp of this to ocut7tenof mee' ng on September 22nd between the above individuals regarding the indicated subjects. Richard Meyer i diGatedcertain t pro bl em,c. I �Ih iI �h I th. proposed lan d use e configuration represented with res et tothe adopted Community Plan and existing urban planning agreements:. cMutuatltgrement wbuldhave to be reached bJTigard and the:,, County ta instiueaaechange. The respon ibi1 i ty for stimulating this action would fall to Russ Krueger as the, property owner/developer. t.3, _i • II The' o o ase rea r nmenextensiont and' I of MUrray Road oai d acro;ss t ekrueI g pro perty was discussed. A plan and profile was submitted by Bob, lefecuhe,rnoting that a 40 MPH desi had, been achieved throughthe oa o e� cesuper p � ..=1' p� elevation on I the curves, Marty Ni zl e.k indicated that the County would review this since'll the reduced' radius curve occurred at the I intersection of' 135th and .difficult mi 1'ht occur i n crossing n centerline �' g r g `' over the four percent super, (It is noted here that a"problem has been noted iin the proposed Murray extension = an excessive amount of skew would at the intersection of Scholls Fcrr, I �;ceed�n County ��tandard exist � � �;I g s.) LI . . .el T e s h des of 135t as d:7,`c '�.�edand n'' f h w would consist,�a b 5 7 s 1, of two 14 foot o gt tt avel lanes and a. 10 foot bike path, on one side on l J (per IGi City of Tigard t�equest)dk In add tion, the LID design will a,'ssume (at some point) I there Iwi l l! be a I I (transition section to construct, the interconnection to Murray as 1,1.411 'a wider (;section from Murray to 1W1ainut.I Ire this area, al4 foot refuge (turn)' ' 1 , 1 [lane win, have to be "transii tim ied1.nU' to '; he ides gnl II I I Itl was t e,M.. fed that Genie '��r►th... would i`icarry the LWfeas7 k�117 t . � p fo A,+ r! Ity assum7 r options A and B, A copy of the Keech plan and profile has bee�� p��o°,rided to � ether I for this �purpbse� �hbwevery the possible deficiencies noted above are reiterated. 1 I I ;I I II o("�fiy a �+a �y e�y iy yy�t +� w a±{s noted on se'.�� G 't i14 1� 1^'YGL�7 t hat- the City of sea, I I p op � Iverto��, ;,pax:p a jog I n. the; northern end of the 1 85 th al nment to come in to I, requested � S'chol is Ferry, opposite a property line on the north side Iof sc:ho11s.� This ttiwo tld facilitate the creation I of a four-way i ntersecti!on By' copy. 'of this rnet to eaveretoti i s requested to i mmedi atel contactGene G t ger I I y � y �n I with the de-tails otherwise this not be done t.Rt t,1GN w-ss I *Fw ve foot sit dewal;ks b'ehy rid curhs CCS Joliti Bike path� to h ea ad�er along east I 'I ya -� 4.a t . I I i I I • .. i . w __.: '\--- w 7 q , (d ik ) ---q .,-,;,, _f,ii , . c, 4,;;,4',L, 4"."'s 1 ' RYAN 0 BRIEN 'rS''' i 0 rtl' 119B Planning Consultant -t4GA.ia 1134 S.E. 23rd Ave. • Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 • t (9'6F15 " ,,;‘, Bill Monahan, Director of Planning �'',, •, , ��tober �, 1 �$3 �. City of Tigard 1, P.0 a Box 23557 1 i ,' , ;v.. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Subje ct. Plan Am endmen. fox) the Krueger 0 ger Pr o perty. Dear Mr. Monahan, On behalf of Russ Krueger' and the other, property owners of 105 acres of land west of 135th Avenue and south, of Sol-lolls' Ferry Road, we are requesting the relocation' of a neighborhood commercial designation , form the west side of 135th Avreia:ue, south, of tax. lot 100, to the northwest corner' of ta.x lot 1000. along Scholls:` Ferry Road.. As you may recall we discussed ti-,is, location before, and another location at the northeast'' corner of tax 1,o;t ,1000 along. 135th Avenue. property y 'hen the zoning �was adopted for this ro ert bythe City of Tigard x , City Council, we'' indicated uncertainty over theexact location of the ' 1 commercial property 'because of transportat .on, marketing, aesthetic !: 1 and topographical reasons. Now that, we 'are, much further along :in the planning pro'cess.' and the ' 35th Avenue LID process, we have a I _ much better idea on the best location for• this commer'cial property.; Our proposal is shown 'by the a,ttached maps. , Asyou may recall, you indicated,: that; the PlanningCatiim ,s on + y 1 s� would initiate a. /plan ,amendment for ,chis property in the future.. The City/ County tPAAp�cz, fieally states that t�i e�Tigand/Bull Mt. plan can be ' amended by c�� pera-b on between the City aid County Planning Direr tors.. We did.; not 'intend to process' this', amendment at suchan early date., However, ashing t.on Cuh:tyPlanning ng Depariment feels , that resolution ion t Issue �svery important�prior to preparation of plans for i. provement o f 135th Avenue and the LID hearings. At this time we would , ,.1�,.ke to 'Spec�.f�ca�41y requestplan Ifyou. nead any further .gin- a amend �.:n, ;�.c,cordan^e with the �a.ttached maps. � �: ,�. fornat ondoeuaentation or justi ica,tion in order to procees this ,i amendment, please give me a oall'. ' i in c er;e1y' co; Richard Meyer e true e..r s t � /0' r ' ., Ryan 0113r en ( . . k { # iRl4Lii. I i 1 1 . 1 33e tt,0 ta.., q.. 1A l 1 j :: { 14d a '-'1,,4,„#,,',.,-,..,,,... .4d0 • "444' •err +d ! +l03 , wa r,e •3 V`� U %es#i; 4 so 4 I1......,„,,,,,..r- ',1`, a33 I r tax! ' a. `ter,- i , 1 �. OVO '1 t f„7+ a 4. r3 Z i s�.# C,1 3 k 33 �,.... ,;,. 1 0 'I � �;\ / # r �j,, L .T 1 .1 34D , 1 I rw � f� � {I , �•803 r#o i ,� ua t .....''''' l 1 I' ''if j 3. i�: I I �,,.•qt• if I UL `�. Q N•er. �' 1 ' � / �� 7dd 1 � I i 3 I 1 U 107 1. ,, e"" �3ti1M11i{ ., t ty i' • 1181111111• I• irr` rurar i06 � , e T. 80 0- «r 39 ''♦esA# I �I I u r 1 t"r R ' {:�108 ...\?. I , I Igo{ . .• ti . 90. 1 ..0. � 1 NNrdf#IGw i liIY t I , , 1 , .- ,,„„ 1 , A , ,Fg0M&r.,-.1;) , , , el , , , 1 '‘ ...,....1„..,..C..OV,.kikik,e-F.CJIAL-- ' ,,i; 1 H , tdt * � nI M ' I 1 "c_ •..t a ..dEti 1 ;; At?-5A «� I � •ii '. �� .i �l t!'�+ ..w ,, isa i « 1 .d.1r r•t I P 3/ TO 1 ' u r 1200' � 1.302 I �• ' 1} rt was 'Lati, I c,.r �. O ww w , tl 300 w w in p srer ' 1M 1 2dd idr ; , ob II #ir i 1111 i i1P 1 , 7 h I ra a • w 's 1M1 ,„ , \ i x �� LOT4tti+t0 , t t r i ww re.Lr' 2 c, I I 1 � , 1 � , , ,,,11 .,,t, i , , . ...,.. , , . , „ ,Il „ „ , I I I„ , ort , V i I 3 us 0.4 1 1:.,,Jt , ,.•., V t, � ' .{ �L"i ,ea kitty* ML1i'+y r'"" arbs .rrw afaa- a s+w�' r" r � .�, I�btl t iqtt �+ Icliu '�1,, �2�� Mtn� \:**101, i2gi i Ifs """ 'ti4,4 lt-eta • too ..,ii,... 'a1�r, Biu uwaf t r i.It 4. A i+V"1'1. 41h Ut 1' t 1 ,i1 ii ! ' , . s t+ �~ tr.l "•� g I '' i,i,t 'yt.. y. Ittid k k1. '1 _. x.,,w ., •..0...n I. `. b : 4` i' 1 i N+. i, .. II e Seale:l ■.300 1 i 1 1 1 I P • I 1 �C ' I I Il , 1 I I CIVIL ENG1NEERt1 I I MI ' t§,ND SURVEVOftS&PUNNERS � �1,10 N E iNIRD AVENUE : 1 I, NtLl56OR0.OREGON 47123 II 50JId4E•4109 1 ,/ k rail ',•:4,,,'''..•,'.' ,,,-.%1-*,,,,,,,z1...i.,t,,,,,,, : '1 ' ' '' ' ' 1 r m 1 ' i're II //1 I `-1.,,�� I= / I Parcs!21 I�' 11 ,I I P2,�s�''..�,'` ,� 9.9 Acres I {I � .4r Y� ��I I "$.wCe�,, 4� � f` I J ! f '`y / i'' d III I' I i,II j I'...11,1 I I' i xe441 r 1 y!O ti.. Ii 4 I I ' �✓� , I I \ r A�r�e�11, ,/ 1 1J , I Y`� � � �`�\ \.. y 1 � � �! � ��.y.J✓� I �.. II I ��'� y✓✓'y++"" •\ 4` 11 - n i I !' y " $Stl r � � � 4//J' 26,',..,, adrCer�s �1 1 I 1f J f �Y --^+' r y t II i J, / y /L47'.rli tea // , Parcc/. w'" W �' ! / �f 1 7/' k \ I S 1 1III ,� �`i-'-'- / 1,10,"''''+'' Yyj rr' yj/� ,.W`� L'�,,-W'' \� 0 i' II 1 1 1 u , i Y" `1 y w � i i I YMrni'1' �{ 1 � I I u 1 I.l 1 ,' i � '�•W. �� .+•"•� EC Ca ` I • �m, q �T' y'��I P yo+/i'IV�"�1'Y'.`!�Y� � d� # • • `i'r..il,, �." ,1Y}� (r 'Vy„ Y ti .j✓. f%d+'n I`w-� I1 I / 1,,,,....,.....:...,''''....Z., w r.ea y �4,,,...•r'L-='w.a .tit.01.ff'...-; �TPY 'IyV' "�d'y-...y 1 ' �! � � � _.'^�. ...�Gu:'""_. � �/'" � .,�,ly� +:...tet +..�.at� j: +I . k t /I I '4 1 /1 '''''7-77 ../1.w+" Y. ',./,•,,,,.'''''„4,146 I I ,. { I I 'I 1 1, If I •I • �' I 1 w .I j ILII"A �C1+4'}'. , .�.,„ / Jt 1,-6'9'.4'"4,,./ F.'l ,," 44,,51c,"), .1 1,.. I jI'f I i WN+j y„JI' 1(—,'I'S W�i � I I. /I/ f I , I 1 i ; I I. ti 1 r I , ' * f--,,,,2/av,/,04';`-.7 . 1 O • .1�1...► WASHINGTON COUNTY - �2.iiiTION BUILDING— 150'N FIRST AVENUE ;d>!~ ADMINISTRA i-`"*"-17 6.e.,,,,,, Nile / HILLSBOR0,ORCGON 97123 RF � I BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS September 15, 1983 DEPT.OF PUBLICVVORKS WJVES MYLLENBECK, Chairman ROOM 201 BONNIE L. HAYS,Vice Chairman (503)648-8886 EVA M. KILLPACK I JOHN E. MEEK LUC!LLE+N REN ' ' � I PyrRy n 0tBrien 1 , I P , . 1134 23rd AvenueY. Hill oro, OR 97123 . . RE: Russ Krueger Property "' I 9 p y II _I i I I i II I I I I Brien:Dear Mr." 0'Br7 � , I I 17 This Department is in receipt of your report by consultant Robert Keech entitled, "The Russ Krueger Property Traffic Assessment Study'". The purpose of this ' : correspondence p isto detail additional material which i s necessary to further our i'' eorres consideration of this alternative, Further, we, are attempting to expedite the 135th Avenue Local Improvement District and explain our perspective on this matter. , The County Planning Department hos been asked to respond to the land use assumptions/configuration of the Keech report. At this point in time, their a Pl ar1 Amendment may be neccess ar on our°_Part.preliminaryresponse �s that y y p t Second the e materi al Ii ncl uded i n the Keech report rt i sinadequate to fully access } z f the viability of the proposed alignment. We find the lack of property lines , topography and other physical features (for example, existing entrances on 135th Avenue just north of your proposed intersection of Murray Extension and 135th) aremissing. As you will recall we had employed the firm of Ginther Engineering to select preferred alignments into the 135th-Wal nut vicinity. In propos i ng• a shift as you do, i t will be necessary to provide plan and profile fat^ north as . information which allows a comparison of the alternatives. v , To continue towards formalization� at 7 on ofthe Local 7 Impr vement District, we have directed Gene Ginther to consider the preferred ed alternative to be the design we had previouslyagreed towhich connected just north of Walnut. He has also 'been , , asked to indicate for public hearing purposethatseoon alternative is being considered, ItWill be necessary for Mr. Kruegra�dy ~rselfas his reprrden r, tative, to provide the defense of this change III We are initiating� ag review �. . N:r. eechs and: mill corresand our Icritique ' when we have comP1etedtre review. 1 Sti neerely ill I I I I I I I fir; a" f I I ' Larry Rice } q IDirector of Public Works W ‘,..4,,,,,,',..,,,e y e J, iN . MGi:ss MartinCNiz ( cCl Gene. Gi tither. Transportation i vi s on Managei.'' R,c a els 1 Burry air squaw dpp ttu;ntt eii pt yet I , /^ r e ., Sept 13, 1983 Robert Keech? PM EN , I ric. 1990 BIW 119 th Ave. • Oregon r7`c:w (503' 6411-6333 Frank City Er'ng rleer, G;+ty of T"i gar^d P. O. F{ox 1L:.'7b5 SW Ash T g rd, Or�egioiM Re:*, Tr',artsri7i• • a1 o Traf is Impact •t riot RLtss Kr1.teg rh s A r'i�►pry G -------- 5, Fran y Eria1l�tsed is a e►'py of the "The Russ Krruiegcry Property Traffic Assessment Stk.tdyit. I cpm ser`rd ir•ig you a copy on behalf of Rust for., your, irnfiwirhrli&.ion. and review. We r" eedirtg with d on the col igr•Eritent with the county. This a1 igrirtient fol 1o.iws the approximate one • that we hadl �t�'1.t,.7aeC�ss in your office on June C d 1 If you have Ali-1y gi_test ic.,rms p1ealse feel free to contact tiyse7 •f or Ryan Oy Brien, 1:1,-1 the 1t`teanct ince: we will keep you it fi:ir�nted �ts '; GFrs5 7 w_�r�e pr.'ogessM 0 I syn,e. ely; I I: r k I , Robert Keech � , II, . L I I Ii I rr � 1. o.l,wa u 1 •uA,ry fv v. I PLANNING COMMISSION 1JISCUSSI0N AND ACTION CommissionersButler- and Vanderwood, both stated they had attended the City Council public hearings and did not support the change. Commissioner Fyre supported the NPO's recommendation. o Commissioner Owens did not feel there was enough information to make > a decision, espcially since the NPO felt one way and the City Council #` another. EdL wasthe to N � 4 concerns, howe�rer, o Acting, President n sensz. P� �� , e , , • there is merit ' to the City ' Council decision and he supported the existing language. o Commissioner Butler moved and Commisioner V�Vanderwood seconded to keep policy 11.4 as' stated in the Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies document. Motion carried by majority vote of the Commissioners present, , Commissioner Fyre voting no. f' 5.3 SUBDIVISION - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT S 8-83' Century 21 'Homes NPO # 3 This atemihas been wz }thdra wwill be reheard on Octuber,,4, 5.4 ANNEXATION - ZONE NE CEANGE IC 1.2-83 ; S.W. 78th and Pfaffle.. [ A request by residents of SW ,78th Avenue to consider a petition for annexation to the City nf' Tigard. Also, : to assign a low density Co Plan designation and a R-7 zoning ,, x.a l ' mprehens xve �; residential „+ , Hap 1S1 36CA tax ' � !designation. Location:6 (Wash, Co '"1 -. �" lots 400, 500, 000, 700, 800,. 900, 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400, 2000,' 2001, 2002, 2003, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 4800, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5201,'` 5300 and 5500). o Assistant Planner P)..shra t'.e; mada staffs recommendation f0tr approl.oal. .� is NPO AND CCI COMMENTS No one appeared to speak n APPLICANTS PRESENTATION. Steve Mosbacher, 11115 SW 78th, ' respre.senti..ng area requesting annexation stats;;d. they 'were unhappy Theyhadwith the Metzger Plan. pr on of their + Theyh 1; opened. to� through s traffic.he con ta: F , . street and it` being� �i ed to be annexed to � the City of Tigard attd that the: City would help thea fi tnaintaia their'residential character. as. P-OBbI�C T"EST'1M014Y � 0 etated Shirley 10307 SW 90th, � for the �tetzgeix CPO,o p ` � the� ' ' lanRrecotiiniended there be Ito pa.x,�rt<ecemeal annexation done. They did not support the applicati n unlesa the rhrh.t le Metzger CPO area wound. be attne ed P C, S NN1N N" �0 I ON '1I � OTl�S l , SeP teber l3� �9 3 Pa at I i I o Mary Bartlett, 11045 SW 78th, stated' they notonly had a traffic problem but also wanted police protection. There is also a drainage problem which they felt the City would be able to help them correct. CROSS EXAMATION AND REBUTTAL j interested in o Comm eo 1e were r s s Toner Owens q.�es tioned i fl any other P p annexing"I to Tigard and why was staff recommending a piecemeal ' ' annexation. I , , I Director of Planning and Development Monahan explained d that the Urbanban . Planning Area Agreement does not allow the City to initiate piece meal annexations. However, if property , owners initatedthe petition then the city could .:accept, No;l one else in the area was interested G�. ' in annexing. COMMISSION DISCUSSION A NDACTION O N o Commissioner But,..er, was concerned about the substandard streets and if the policy was being followed as stated in. the Policies document regarding uonremonstrance agreements against the formation of LIDs. o I Lengthy discussion followed regarding the condition of the streets and who was responsible for bringing them up to standard. Consensus of the Commission was that they supported the zone rl;change annexation with the signing' of nonremons trance agreements. o; Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner lore °,seconded to forward a recOrnm,endation of approval to the City Council' for the ,.proposed (single annexatiannexation, and for approval of the Zone Change to R-7 tsg family residetn!ial) become effective upon Council approval of the annexation with the, condition � ed d hat policy1 I c and d for LIDS be required t for annexation. O.1.1' b k.'otion carried unanimously by .Commissioners presents 5.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AMENDMENT CPA 14-83 LCDC Goal # 5 is A request by the City of Tigard to update the Comprehensive Plan to comply with LCDC Statewide Planning, Coal # 5 coiaaidering' an analysis of Economic, Social Environmental and Energy (EESE) factors. o Associate , Planner Newton` reviewed the document requesting .the Planning Commission make a recommendation' to City Council. ' P , PUBLICTE T iONY - Nag1 e� sPPe ed to speak a , I I CROSS E'AMINATION,,AND'REAU'TTALI o Commissioner Edits , ues t Toned if an operating 'tree. Farm, voul to cut trees. tsoc„.ate .P1anner Me.wtou. 'explained there t asp` Tree ' ttirig Ordinatxte which exempts ' individuals who belong to certain I ,I Tree F.struiitig Orgata aatione '. .i. I I PLAtN1N0 CCMMISSYON M1it1Tes S September 1.3 1 83 Pic a 5 w 1- THE RU '+;<RLTEGER PROPERTY TFC AF FIC ASSESSMENT STUDY r • .m i v ��`Cr3NS1�I. Y T12Af FIC gNGTNEER r � ISI i I , I N � THE RUSS KRUJEGER PROPERTY 1.' TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT STUDY ; TABLE CF _CONTENTS ,, �I. IN.TRODUCTI;ON: 1 ta. Objec,tive.,...w.=. a • .r. . . ..w • . •,. a . a lbL.ocation.■ ■ . . •a:._IPA.,ill OA. •.11 ., •t. . a F IV I 1.. I.c Proposed Deve l opment. . . w .,. w a .:1. ,' '' '' , -i Id.. Proposed Collector. • w . . . • . . 1 I.I.�. CONCLUSIONS:. l'; I Access Layout ? .'I:Ib. Spading r between SW13, th ; and SW. Morning, Hill, L ^.' ,e . • E 1 tIc. Sight Distance. . . ...w • ■ . .„. . • . ►`�. , n . r III.' FINDS:, -, p s, IZIa. Projected Characteristics of 'il Generated tdo l times. . . . . . • . ., a . . . . 4 a t . a s ' , ILsb. Pro�ected Charaotei 'istics of � 'f , ' - traffic ibuti.Ot,iiaw . •' -b . • • . •• 11,• . .3 r _ e ' .l1hc.,' Ye3r= ?Me Traffie Proaectiin » . . . ..• . •3 LLI 1d.. .Access' to Residential Area• aaaa,a a . . • 3 tLIe. Spacing Between 1..25th and Morning Hi 3 i-� Dna.1e • •_•w . w w.I. • .�. . . . • a.. a e w i APPLENDI x I! A Vic .'nit i' Map I i S Site Lay out i C Str t �� Layout C; D •Tri,p Generat i��n . . il - E ' ' Year 2,o013 T"raff�..c � 1= Projected Traffic Flow , ,iJ S L.eve,l of See. ice H Prc,. ected Da .l=. .� Traf f,x i S.igg'esttd Access Plan 1 w P `. et's .�” Ca a�x`t r Anal ��,s �o�rW� sh� Storage Length Cal:cttiat ioihs fi Y G Hi, l i M 1 t l 1 '� A il ,, THE RUSS KRUEGER PROPERTY f' TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT STUDY L. INTRODUCTION: . 1 rnfcrmat ion for•' this report was obta; ned" from Ryan O' Brien, u PLanning Consultant- Washington CountY Staff; City of Tigard ar d ' Staff; and Cityof Beaverton Stuff..; The avail,aE,aa= ata is limited:.. The year 2000 traffic , a pr:.o1ecticns Ore based on Washington County' s latest giant rehensive analysis to 1': tra►nsportat� n Planning effort. A c p refine the ye�;.r• 2010 projections is underway by Met r,o and ODOT. and is anticipated to be completed by early 1984. �. the I,"aR CtE�.,TECTYVE.• This. report examines imoact of the Russ ) 4.: t Krueger propertyon an alternative ative alignment i4 n ment of the proposed ' co lector street, "A" Street. The primary issue is the location io» ) ofaccesspoints along thissegment of the proposed collector. Ib. LDCATION. The KrUe erPropert is located 2 est of downtownTigard bewteen New- and SW 135th '(see i. vicinit mapin appendix ) 1 Y i' " . PROPOSES DEVELOPMENT: The Krueger property is I approkti rately l05 acres,. 6 of= which being considered for .. commei^c•ial development and the• balance: in medium" to high density residential The total anticipated traffic generation is l;r h :; 00 ! " trips/day. Estimated peak* hoKr" cenerat 1�nis 7�S veh. /hr and r t32a veh.- 1, AM and PM Ld. PROPOSED COLLECTOR: Washington County' s "Functional lazsification Transportion System'r', indicates a proposed major tollet:tord from:.the. : outith end of Murray, at Old Scholls, to SW Gaarde Street in scut► Awest Tigard. Washington County has peojec, ed this facility to Icarry 900 veh/hr. during, the PM peak Period, in the year 2000. " I This co1lmctor� is being studied by Metro and ODOT as a part of a comprehensive study of' the southernnio'%tropolitan are This study is anticipated to be completed in 1984. Other 'issues will including also• be addressed,; • the realignment of New Schol is , I Ferry at Old Scholls Ferry to line Up with SW Davies, This ealig N ecessary to reduce the conflict With the r tion of SC a�nerseCe�t Will �ho l ls' and SW 135th. r " 4 C .. I I i „ r Patie i � i , I 1 ., `N, Washington County ,staff has indicated an uncert a i n i t y as to the functional class of this facility. To keep the arterial option open, the County is requiring that the facility, bei . ! reviewed ! ' design toan arterial. standard. ;This ©sol�.cy will be_ after'. thecompletion of the Metro report. IL CDNCLUS LONS . ' � . IlaACCESS LAYOUT- Aminimumofthree access po nts� should, be' provided for access, to and from the residential area south of 'aP! Street., •One to. Scholls Ferry! one to SW 135th south of . morning HiLL and an access point across from the proposed SW 135th-' intersection with o'R" Street. (See Appendix I) e. °' I /b. SPACING OF THE. INTERSECTIONS OF SW 135TH AND SW MORNING HILL:The spacing. between SW ;135th and 514 Morning Hill Dr. should ', be- at• least 365 feet measured from the westbound stop bar to, the eastbound stop. bar.. ' IIc.. SIGHT DISTANCE":Special attention should be given to g distance during design and design review of bothLI i' ' intersection s i ht, tie' street and adjacent development. � p IL.I FINDINGS T i' II,Ia- PROJECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES: Table' g contains a summarhy of the prof-ected trafficd enerated • from' the proposed, development (see appendix D for additional details) , . . E TAB . T A Traffic Generated .� � Projected A( Phi ADT' Residential Use EN: 1.25 V/Hr , 590 V/Nr UT' ' ' 500 V/Hr 255 V/Hr TOTAL 625 V/Hr 84E V/Hr 7800 V/day iComimr+ecial Acfriviy ` V IN 9 V/her a 43 V/Hr OUT I 48 V/Hr a+, V/Hr . 8 "'i't1�"AL. &40 V/Hr 486 t/J'�-Ir 4 d y" i ', i i r 1 Page o r , Lf • ' II , , tI.Ib. PROJECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION: . ' .Table B contains a summary of the trip desires to and fr►gym the res ident�i a l area. This estimate is based on ;i n f`►D rnra.t i► r from Metros regional transportation modeling effort. { TABLE B . Pro ected Traffic Distribution (Residential) "', • NtlN; HOLM PERCENTAGE r. TRIP END OF TOTAL .TRIPS " GREATER. HILLSBORO AREA 4.3. AREAS. ti ' WEST OF MURRAY 24.5 " , GREATER. BEAVERTON AREA 25.4 SOUTH PORTLAND 10.8 , SOUTH. METROPOLITAN AREA 17..9 NORTHEAST METROPOLITAN AREA 11. 6 FOCAL. 5.5 W LLIcr YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC PROJECTION: Appendix i>z E cont:�ins' a, year 2000, projection based on Washington County's traffic forcasts. y- I ' L td.. ACcESI E' TO RESIDENTIAL AREA: There appears to be a need ' for at Ieast three access points to the residential area, to the ' i:w,,.south of "A" Street. The left turn movements from unsignal ize ` p,cle• streets. will S.. etc er•xencca."delaY e- This is not considered to si, ,M,. be. a, major' pr~oblerrr because• more free flow alternatives will ek ist-.. " .W ;' TWc access pothtsare indicated on "inside of curve" toclsighthampered by the alignment of the main road. tions or where the normal line. of � could be harp er ed 9.r :: 'II h I L ; 11 LI te.; SPACING ,BETWEEN 135TH AND MORNING' HILL_ DRIVE: The. i , left J. criteria fort determining the' adequacy' of spacing sturn storage requirements. In both alternatives the left turn il;iovements are relatively free flowing with minimal left turn stor{a e required.„ This res .Lts in a lnecessar�y. spacing acin ► f 355 I ,g 'P Y P 9 , feet measured from the westbound stop bar at SW 135th to the eastbound stopbar at 8W, 'Morning Hill Dr. Gee appendix K. t H ; i I ; W r , i i I • p 'NI i 'Page 3. ' I I I of 1. Tom•• < . r r r } r 4 a s F r f - - � A,yr•�wtir°�3"^;_t: .,- tY C�-+ _�. : I I • r • I w ' I . .III I , I I I n I I I w I I � / 't 3R . I w I _ I I, I I I I I i I I , .I '�I I I I . , I I ; , , , I I I I L � I , I II �Y II iil I I I I; I , I , , I II II I I I I I I I ii 04 10, I I I w � I r } '� I V Je ,,,,A, 1 ( • F g _ - n a X0 ,. , _ , , . : '', . . -- _ _ z -04 = .-- _ ., _ -- - _- _ __ ._ .. ... q' - - p 0 -- '- -.'. - -- - --- - -- - - - -- --- p, 0 - - F a x, — , , 6 t - . ..,:.. .. . _ _ __._ _ - ..-._..s-.^- �=•-"rte. Sx _ _ 6 - - E _ _ _ .,_ _ _ _ . . _il f �. s } < a` t - - '. r • .. r _ _ - ,- _ t_... . _ _ - _ _, . - - _ - -____,--:---_. _ _ - _ _ _ _ tf) t ¢ $44, ir-Y . . . _ _ ,,%,,,,,‹ , , oFT. ti - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . d , a . ,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ., ... ...........,....1,, - 4...---..., - _ - \ - - itytl-lbACII!,3%Pli.V.ikt/Iftl ' ., : _ *_ _ _ _ _ __ _ .. . . __ _ _ _ ._ _ ___ _ 4 _ _ r. -- -i - - '-- - - - - - = .- i-k Ito) - - . --- - . .' ' - - - - - .-- ' - leD-k-r*'''PE- - : - - - -- V- - - ,'- __ - - -- - - - . -I'TI,'\ - cg:-.. ._ -___ . . , _ ;- _..eF ; _ 1 - . _.' \ '- — -I- , - - - ' - -_- ---.---i_ - - - - -_--...7.---=: ''''-.--- --_--- - :_ - MIC71-0-1%, _ -- -- ' �..=--fir - I �-I Ei --- - = -- -- -,..---- -:- - - - - - -: 11?S'S i 17 ifl ,$1-1A L. - ,...v.- ,,, ___ - _ i n ROBERT KEECN.P=E- J " (a)641.6333 .,• 9. } T - - i - - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ I - t - 1' X ti F' - H } - - Z - iA _---'i.-...,..:,-.,_.-:._.-;..-_,....-„,..,_ i''F �t I of _ _ .. .. :. 3f t 3 $ t r 3` _ f' ,. f } va e I r (EEf 1 ➢RED61 j W t • - - 2..S,a).,%Ft15)4d'''n5 i ''''l - - .. _ : - . -4 -----, ..........,.......t............,.............\ _ • , , . . -‘,-14e4ielayi riol \ PLiscildilig - -ad 1,-, +>� ati �' - _ a L ' ; y i R ,e 5E-;nit _: , ' ...ti fri‘ -0 • 1 • 3 s 2� 1 f S s n ` { ix i "� �="."- = s '..._,:. ......n rte..... -.- - - - - - E ..�.. ., .. r41. ...m.n..t .wh »rAl.•.:r'.. ..'.411,.I»...- ...y .4.4- ..rt. A i..,�Ai«�rh,..v.brs,t...:ILLW,-...StF,i'=:.':11nllw.+w_ a. �! , ;..rnN'efJiarr t • y • xh • u • 'T" Gs r'"1.. r a.. i c:11 r3N 3' a y ' } V` ♦ A `�..1� � # •rY,.I A 1 +W ni4„� • W w Y rr4 �. r aAti '1 ! ,y H `�•.a A '"4 h xr4t'Pa Ps• 6 in�ak. �+ r A,w ,.Y"i'M "." ' ys"6 syv w`i�r1~��.'.&1yr'�r`- Ir 4�Y �'Ew VYMIy:��IN°l,�r__ 'Y�f. v . ! 4Y �r• •1, ^�•• ,7 w •tk",k� X a�, . • • L i l�.�.y '7 a< �� «, M� Y i wi :t • N u rr . 1 .+rs•" owt !! yk: �,11�a•'Fr.7 , ' ! y#A '1 j 'x .Jn4� 1 ! M y ��..�/� mow• 'I Yywr A W r+ y n .Naa.iWWr IM r .� r �.kN ° t hx 1 " r is x •r +w � • w i „ Il I 7 } 1 yh I I _ I I r , y j - I • .f-lu .4'i.-'4ttray, 11-..1 ••.w:k tt 11 ad, _._tAuLnb " .fta =[.t,.^_tL J t 1 R, ,14., 1 �✓.. - �. .Cf'fw•—'1.e.1 t is t ' PROTECT SITE (TRAFFIC. GENERATION ' Worksheet SITE NAME:. Ci mmercial Development on Russ Kro_ue;er' s property . ,.' SITE SIZE *(A) a'.31.2,"8e)0,' Sq.. Ft. • SITE USE'. Mixce•d Comt^ mecial DAILY VEHGENERATION ICLE TRIP" RATE (B)**•:' 80..0 Tripsl'Unit' PERCENTAGE OF' TRIP 'OCCU R I'NG. DURING' AM PEAK ._(C)**e ";. 3% PERCENTAGE OF, TRIP DCCUR INE` DURING PM PEAK (D)44: 11.5% TOTAL, DAILY' GENERATION (E)==AXE: 4,24, `TripsiDa�r, AM 'PEAK. HOURLY' GENERATION (.F)=CXE:. :L40' Trips/Hour . 'J., PM PEAK HOURLY' GENERATION (G)•--AXE'.. 4'f85 Trips/Hour AM° ENTER'' TRIP SPLIT (H)** 0''..GS Trips Te.ipS .itet I Tcta.l Tripe L....., PM ENTER'TRIP' SPLIT (t)*** . 0. SG Tripes in / Tcta1 Trips AM,' TRAFFIC: VOLUME' IN FXH:. 9E. Tt^i ps/i-foat,tr, Ate TRAFFIC. VOL.UiME OUT FX(1. -H) : 48. "TCr ,i pslHouxr ,' PM TRAFFIfIC,µVOLUME IN GX.'I 2,4*.,"'. Tri ps/Hour' "1 PM' TRAFFtC< VOLUME OUT GX(2,.-1)'': 243 Tr"ips/Houtr~s; • . a. " t^ o ad' p lan; source Ryan O'Brien; PIaPni.ng C Po nsctltant ' .. TRB-187; ''QU:ICK-RESPONSE URBAN TRAVEL ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES AND . TRANSFERABLE PARAMETERS-USER'S GUIDE"- Table #t, Aver'a8e Vehicle Trip trates and. ether characteristics Of; genet^atoP^s" *.a�*C'omposite of local field obsenVat ia`1 a' , • , i f " I °f f I. G I t � I .ACSUM*ttth iE li ,':,. 'i f 1 r T4' T R'AFFIC GENERATION , e P ROJ•EC7 S T T Worksheet „ n. 1 Development on Russ Kru_uege=r' s property SITE NAME. Resis�e iia, pss SITE SIZE (A) :1E�lO Dwe1..1 incl: Units f• ��'� SITE'USE:. Mixed. Resideretial� U r ni GROSS DWELLING DENSITY *:6-e4 ts/Ac.. 1 DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE (B)** 6. 5 Trips/Unit PERCENTAGE'OF TRIP' OCCUR•ING. DURING. ' AM PEAK (C).)1.4(,:, 8.0% . il PERCENTAGE OF TRIP. OCCURING DURING PM PEAK (D)a*•- : 110..8% , -,= TOTAL DAILY .GENERATION (E)=A14(13:. 7800 Tips/Day Aft PEAK HOURLY 'GENERA"CIONN = p i• '. ( F� CXE... 62� Tri s�lHout^ I i, PM PEAK `HOURLY GENERATION (G)=DXE: 842.; Trips/Hour^ AM ENTER TRIP SPLIT (H)41.**: O. etzt Trips in / Total. Trips PM ENTER TRIP ''SPLIT CI,)***: 1;1.7173 Trips in / Total Trips n AK TRAFFIC VOLUME, IN FXH: 125 Trips/Hour AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT FX (1. -H) t. 500 Tr i ps1 Ha ur PM' TRAFFIC" VOLUME IN OXI 590 Trips/Hour ' PM TRAFIC' VOLUME OUT GX(1..-I.) : 252. Trips/Hours t' • { II 4i ''''' , ''''. '''") M4e. Proposed p La? sources Ryan Cli'Sif,,ieli•ii. Planning Consultant r 1 :, TRE-1.a7; 'QU,ICK-RESPONSE URBAN TRAVEL ESTIMATION TECHN'LQUES AND '! TRANSFERABLE PARPiE ETERS-USER;'S GUIDE!"; Table ##1 Avera e ,Veh i 1 e' Trip • • rates and other characteristics of gerertor^s" *• •, Comp' s,itE of local., field tobservati n • , . yi fi{1.� tt1 1 yy14 `ry o .. =.,rte:.. F` .-,,, ,,—..Y-- _ - ..i".. Y-: r....--..-..7.---1- -..., _— t - - - - - +-- %1°,4 1 ii.b1 . do '+j�et t 1- T 48 e++.,,lti.,tgs `t} w A j 7 al - 4 1 w ` "y - -- 0 kel- - - - - - - -- " - -9 F- r- -' - -_ - - .), ,6---fes 44,49 b _ - - �' -0 - A - - - - - `6 14 cN4AJ lAap,Okr•ilf-1_41%.1., : t \---- $° ii0lEAT xlice P.1--V- (543}641-6331 o . I Igfriglqa _ \t Yti �� -' " Si. i:1'� , ;e ,, 7 - mo i iia s '"us - ' - '- - ogrO - -- - - --- - ' L' - -- - - - - - -' /01 \si 4N' 4' ''" ' .. - sae -- ,, .... . _ -. --. - - 711. . _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _z __ _ - _ - _ _ - ...0.0 0 k•—•,,r_. O., c 44W 0Agit/"`'-i-4'41 4/././ .% o fi�� 9O\e‘t‘...■•••'F',"*I'L'"'"'''''". CPth -- - ---- ---'-[- 1 - P'r1F-F1 1 Cr - .- - - -- - - - -- - I°a .gyp 4 - t- - =---__-- -- (i?t,,A t e---"ksct.4- 1 b'''-.-V--1-C3 17 . _ _ . _ _ _ _ 1 O ft05€AX KUcH P; i -_ t50Jt.-64T6.,33' s g 1 1 .. .••i. ...��_,..,.1 s..4w,,. . ..mss .u14.�. x.5 w .w ..A L,. •..1,...t..l:at.i .I ..urx,,..,,,4.... `"cryrWY+t"` ''''. .,,I''' ' ''',.,7'' ,, ,—'''''.— • ..,_ 1 ' I: .a.i...mw.-.n...l.,aa....lr.»,.«.-.I,�,..,��,.n•',.... ,� n+.t I I y I t. r { N` ry � P a i " , ..• 4C .+I'ist:L1•r'< 2 Qa 0 0• 'Z,'L-;-fit:E"' i•c r w�" yA J.'w x`y}N M L"wV�� M I'i ♦Y, �. : ' y ,ay a• r r .. 1 S" N ',''''''„'''.t:;',:.,,,:.1': A , N "M° �` "�,,u N.de r 4'w4 , f ,. «'. ..YA•ar N [IFr• 7 • •aa ]� " I 1 I I r Y1. II I I I .r a. I I I I •. _ - t , s - ‘_ - s¢ -�.� v� - Y Rat.o4 Yf@ 4 • -e o - .__ -_..., _ __ . _ _ _ __ i1/4,,,, _._._ . __ _ _ ___ s-, .?_ F-' _7_-_- - '- --_-_-s -= - _ ._- r____-- _-__ c#'11-4.-. _ - - ''.14 - - _ _ OY4 =w -,. - j _ 4- --........._,_____- - �� 1t .f h *34 73414 w Cl j�'pw'„- l� Z-q e 1 - 4 - = - -- 130)zo -- 5, A' d 4�� . , g -w Y -. - _ _ - . _ - _ _ _ - - _-... - ;.. _.:- _ .. -_ ----=_- - _ _ f*,_?__' N1/4...W/-CI,Iir --- 1 - - : l' ' 4 -ti: -- - • _ __ - _=--- __ --_-_ -Q, - 4rAfgw 34,113,.‘,4.10 e.y_-- dr , ` I_ _ _ 1 -___ i - V jo - _A - _ -- - __ = _ _ _ _ _____ ��a0 �, .),4 , _ _ _ - _ _ . .-cc-, __- _ __ - _ _ __ c O, __ _ __ _ _ _ 0_„, _,, . _____. _ _ _ _____ O, _ ti../.A.., . t-,. . _- . , ... ;:_ . -*,... c .- __ : _ - _ _ _ ,.., ,..: _ __ _ __ - _ _ _ ,,.._ . .. ..._ .. . _ _ _. . __ - - - - - - 4,0_,,-- _ _ _- _ _ __ _ ____- _ _ _ __ __ 4,, ,tr). . . _ _ .. ::: ,, _-- . . _ _ _ _ , .,, ,... _ = _ __ _ __ „ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,.... _ v...,.........-...........,,....----- ; ., ,.. _ _ __ s_ . _ _ , _,,, , , _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ .. , _ _ ___.7 , . . -. - , __ _ __ - , r ' ` 1 - .�.4, `*(7--fit.c� = - .-E ', x) -'Ptd - - - - - - - I. t I- = Rauar KflCti,P L. 503 441.6333 _ it aL...,«14....M..�...,.+..n�r.,rl l...iw...,.,..(.{.. ,.. .' s...!!.. :..I«.. ..Y.H'I_. •: a.t�...-�a.-k l�,Yh�.••�. . �J J I I .IIS • I , „ o �I. M r i 4 , • k . 'c,P.=- ja;Ek �► ... r EEa= pclow 4 y MF ai N • fd+ t e y 1 k 4 n , I I I O A a. r - _ f R4 o0811,e t_ II .-!: - .." _ -___--_- - -'----= _ i_.-_=-___ '-: _-___ - - —__-- _ -- ---- — /*-- :sfi‘,,N, •0_ _:__ ==_ _= - -_- ..- _ _ _ :_ -_=1_"_ _ -.-_ _=_1,_ -_- _-_ - - -- -- - - _ - -,.--,_- __ _ -- -- 'I -- kb----- -=_---=-- --_-=--- --- --_-_ - - - - - = - - -'' ' I . -- :_ _ - - -=-_- _ - -- - -_ :-' - -- - -1\a ..''9 14 ._ --_ __ - _ I ___ _ - ___- _- : - : _ - - - ' 4 --- ' - - _- -, - - - -_-_ .4---afvot,.. 4.tsip-iirivk- Fy - _-- ___-_ - ____ _ cs,„.. ,.,4 Ic_v _. _ __ __ _ _,, _ __ t„) o: 40 - N Ott, . } F - - - # SVS '-- - t‘rNr\T ?E' t'-r‘4'- - \?-1".'-7712-1-'°'t:) -.- - -- - -- - ---- -- ; - 1---- ------ -_ --_---.- - - --- - -- - - __ ---- - _ _ -- --- - - _ - '. '-._':-- *OIE3t KEfCFi.P-s.- ,. 15031'&4-6333 — -4 s } Ra« TFP V ,V-‘i r\ s s - -QV ' - — - -ji * *1-11P14PPP‘- iwil.p.,... vti- ,4 - "7 - (T6s -- — ,*li - ' oto. : - /Oc & 7Z "`�► �`'' ''-'7- /jam: == -4 Fr- -4 - - -- ,*-hfctiv. 44tial.4-$ FY. - - .:1.9.1 ' 4 N - - � �: S - � �� jj *33r 3 rt 0 - ' - Tr1-05 -1*--"TE.T.2 r-‘.(-z-k,-,-)Fel.L., - - -- _ - - --- - 41 t, '-., - . 7 13 w th - C :ate 10 17 - 114�®FR H .�? s t;'•Q3}64tKEEC-6333P - t I ft - _ t ' > - _ - - j - - - . et ' � e - , 3- .. 1111111111.111.11111011.11111111111111 _ _ _.. �_ - - - -. a-- _ - _i .._ . .:�., yr..+�e �.. - _.ate. .♦:» _. a - _ • - - -- - - -- ',- _ '"' — • is- -- ',':'- - - - --- - -- .'- - 0‘1;11. --i- -- - ------- = ' - - - - --- 1- _ - - .- . _--''-*-- tjr- „' - - - - -- - -- -- t - 4,- • . _- - -. _ - 4, ‘ti. 1144,-,,, _---:,-_-__.,-,- _-__ __1:_ ,-- -- --_ -, --_ ___,,, -- -:,', .---- -_ -- =.-=-__--_-_: --;__-___ __.__- -__-_-- _ _ , - ___ _ _ _ , , - _ _,,, - 00,...- - ,- - _•___ - ,___,--___- -- . -- _ -, -'- . - - , - - , 1-, _,_!,---_'- - - - . _ - _ = __ _ ___ __ _ _ . - . _-, i . . ,- . - i- _ _ 1 .,_ , ___ _ , _ _ ,, _,_____,, _. ___=_._=__ _ ____..-___ _ --±- _ fl,,:,1;04,41Tip : - -- _ . . _ _, =-- _ ---=. -------- ------ - -- • -- - - ' ____ _ ,, _ _ __ __,_ _ _ __ __4, T__ _,, __._________ ____ . _i____. ,_ ___ ., .. ,_._, ,,, ,, __. _ , __ _ _ ____ ” __ .. _ __ . __ , _ _ , _ . _ _ . ,,, , --- ' - - '' - -- ' - z '--- - - - .-: -- ''- ---'-- ' -' -- °.‘44°'''*-' ‘g.r.rrPF ' - - - = =-- -' ------- -- A - - - -''' - i__ - _ _ . '- (i.....Th A _ - _- - - . _ . ,,'-,.. _ -_ E f . ' r- -- - t ti-,l'el-- - it - - -- -- -. -- ------ -- --i- - - -- *--dqvit 4tIPSigr'r*: -Fy.'-_--- __-_ -- -•/ ii-- _ _ --- '_ - F . ,. ---_ _ r ,/,› • ' - ! - __ _ -_ = _ -_.- _ . _ - st.- ,_, .- _ __ . __ ___ __ _ __ __ \ , ,,,j. ai�01 ,,.iA►, ‘......,....--,,...,—,----,, - -- --.=_ -- - ykalaz....-ce-p--- Niecve -2..:14-:)4--= __ -= r: - --_ - --- - ------'------ 1 - - - .-_ — F ..._ACV E"1... 0 t C.:G 1 - -, '< _ p0lEBF�fEFCN:P.E. ; . t503)i41.6333, 6 e } e , H.LllJr:. ..,wi.a—.",��,-„ •:I r tyhva ,-'1e.... .»L4 +Idkra' v. a i` f, + 1 I 1 1, ", wx4Yr Y" +r 4 1 w ( RI 1, "a all, I a, { I y 1 I 1 f ai I, I I ii i ( i I 0 CE£9-1f4 ice4i 1 i . - - ' 447311 1111001 __ __ . .. .. . _ , __: _ . _ _ _, . /�„ ,_ ,� • . _ . ., _ _- -• i _ _ -, _ _ _ 0002211 __ , _._ ....___ ..• - _ 7, • .., a --' - _ ; -- -_ - '. - _ _ _ __- - _ _ ___ =_ __ _ __ __ __ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ' _ . - __ : _ ' _ _ _ __ ,,.. _ ,e -- - --- - _ __ - _ _ - ,.= ...,.. , _ _ __ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ __ _ ,, _ __ /it __ - „ -, ______. --_--_ _ _ _ ,,,, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ . _, _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ __ i__-_1 . ‘ 444t- - • _ _ _ _ __,: _ , _ ___ _ _, , _ ____ _ ,_ . ___ __ _ _ _ _ . ____ __= __,___ _.,, . ____ _ , _ ___:__ ,_ _ __ _ _ __ _ . ., , _ . _ _ . _ _ __ _ _ _ _ ,.. _ _. _ -i-,-- - . '-' -- - - __ - ., - __ , _s-_-_ , =, s___ - -_-__---- --__. --'--__. ---_--__-___---,-, _---;---,__,- -._ -11... ,. - _.—--_ -'. . _ _ ----. -_ -- ' - - - _ _ , j it :,,,_ i _- _ _ __ _ _ aiiiv .j _ _ ___ _:._ _ , _____. ____,_ ____ _ __ . ____ ___: , „,=____ .0_1 , ______ __--. _ ___. . _ _=, _____.--_ -_ 4- - _ -_--_--_--_ _ - - --_ - - -- -- - t u g ' ,�'"'r'`�4TH �-�-""':"�. S't1Qti 1"10 ` ` 3 • . Pc'� Y. icv+'*at -. 'w'� & ."�»-+�--v'��.. a` .ems__ _�ru-a. y I / ` . �� ' ' . ' '' ' ' , ,, _,.1 ,, ,, , I � ,vM.. .u a b' S I , • N1 IX I ,I I s i r IMI f i , { • ! I I t I . I m " _W��. 777 . - e. 3 goie,...„..0.0.........„...er,..........,„„,,.... 1\1 \4_ _ _ - _ -- _ - _ _ _ . .r-9.•ilit _-_- . - --__-- - _ - : - im, ' -- - ''---- - - \= _- _- --- _---_ - - i_ - _ = -- - _ ' .. , ,peijitillitOg•tr)14v‘ie _ __ =_ - _ . . . : .1___ ;___ _ = _ _ ___- _- _- ..,,,ii , it.,06,11-,.- - - :-- --- -- - - - --- - - -- -_-_-_- if -- = - _-, - noi_tvit.IP46 - ' . : Mott . Yt /,......,. • ,,,i f - ' - -- - - - - -- -- --- 1-1. - -- --- r-- - - - ' - - ,_.# r-gi° *- - _ ,, N#s) teA90.1.4%:.itl Att,L - _ _ -- - t -- f- I - f r r I .' - -- - -'1 6 ' ' - -' f I 1 PD ' --- ' '.' -' - I I g - - t, . - - - - A - - - - - '- �' ,._ __ _, k, _ _ . _ _. _ , F _i : 4 t i 7 - _ l pt)BERT KEEC;t.:l-g. e t503)'641-3333' - _ e _ T { _ { 1_- j x R • + y - f r . _ .; _.... , ..; .., . .. _ ., a . . ; ,- --4:, - 8 - f Y it y -4 # - _ - _ 1 ._ - __r_- 7L .7, . _ - _ _ __ -. . , - .v _ . - . _ _ -_ ,;. _ . . _ • ! . . . t + a _ : ..,.. _ - _ - . . ... , T`� l 1 Eti INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS 71 I INTERSECTION...--,......._ II' ST( �g ANS , SG la�Lss .w.w- DESIGN H / I OUF� YEAFIZoo® . 'I, t I I I I I 11, , I I I I 1,1.• , TRAFFIC VOLUMES: .9 �-- drs � i r I; I I 7 " II I r II , ,I II I I I I I , L , .w 'r I 1 , . r I I ; I , I I� I I II' I I I I I r I 1 1 uu r N I I I \ , I I I -I I � I L I I I I'I I I , I , I I II rf � I. I .• • DIRECTION ' . CRrCAL MOVEMENTSL CRITICAL.LANE VOWt4dIE I I i ..2' ,t1 a , , i I �� u► I rs-� S� m �I �� L II I • I 1 , _ I I I , I , ' i I I I SUS 0=CRITICAL LA�Er�LU�ES 1 1,0 O A ES 4 14/1 ,� I F NU k LEE SERVICE C. I I I L 11 1 I Sum of Critical tattle, Vo u 1 ,, Levet of Se ica 10 PhL Three 'Phase 'o a,ok 'I�iore Ptiases • 1 , 1 ;, 1,., I I dlw 900 SIBS 825 Ir I ' 11050 1000 I 965 , e I ' 120G 1140 i1O0, a, 111 � I I . 1�. 1 ' 5o I "11.7,5 1225 II I I Z 1.SOQ� 1425 1375 �I '. -1 - ". not appllcab1e — — . ...• ——. .. - :-. _ . bilr if ,I I E tyn I II I I 4114 1..1NS ZGNAL F QED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET A Street athd Scholls l x l D x Scho tl sDate of Count : Year 2000 � x x Day �f Week- . We ekd� Yi � I II I I I x Time, cf Day: A Peak Ixxxxxxxxxx.xx xxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 45 B 4 Of lanes on ma;j cr street : APPROACH GRADES xxxxx)cxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx A' 0%:B 0%:C0% I1 A Street 1 I t I i )c. , x • SHARED ,LANES. :. . k» x APPROACH C: none x, C' x. APA 0PR C H' D. none •I I I P I AP ROACH ! ?! > !> >A( <CCCC.Cl ) IJI•> >D< <i< C <ICC>> > ! > 1 >C;< < < C < < <! > 1! > )sB< C;< < < C4 I I . . DL. DT DRI 1 CL CT CR BL. 'Bl` HR, MOVEMENT AIL AT AR • V 450 27'; 56 OLUME,S I E4 39 �01 13 �,k�9 323 ' 40 20 ��0 34 PCH 26'` 43 i LI 14 20 355 44 2E RIGHT TURNS FROM C~ (CR) CONFL.TCTINGFLOW .SAR+ a T 463.5- CAPACITY 454 CRITICAL GAP= 7SEC. IMPEDANCE. ADJUSTMENT i ADJUSTED CAPACITY 454 CAPACITY USED= 9.69% IMPEDANCE CRATED= .93 DEhMAND (LOS=A) 44 D (DR) -' RIGHT O CONFLICTING .SBR+j T='56'l' CAPACITYX86' I CRITICAL GAP='ii7SEC., IMPEI3ANCE ADJUSTMEINIT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 386 t PPC ITY USED= 3.63% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .,197 DEMAND! (LOS—D; 14 LEFT, TURNS FROM' A- (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW, R+ 0 D BT= �4. 5 CAPAC I TY 481 CRITICAL' GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE' ADJUSTMENT= 1. ADJUSTED CAPACITY 481 1 II CAPACITY USED= 5.,.4i% IMPEDANCE CREATED . 96 DEMAND (LOS=A) 26 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) .1 CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT;` 47? Cit•IPACSTY 557 CRITICAL GAP SSEC.., IAMPEDANCE ADJ•USTMENT=1 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 557, CAPACITY USED= 3..95% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .°97 DEMAND (LOS=A) 22 THUR MOVEMENT ,FROM C (CT) CONFLICTING FLOW .5A R-SAT+.(4L+BL+BT+B R= 1091. 5 CAPACITY, 67 1 CRITICAL" GAP= 9SEC. IMPEDANCE' ADJUSTMENT= . 93 ADJUSTED CAPACITY E► CAPACITY USED.----' 1572.58% IMPEDANCE. CREATED= 0 DEMAND (LOS=F) 3551 THUR. MOVEMENT FROM D (DT), +AR,_.- 1088 CAP CI. CONFLICTING FLOW .5$R+EtT+BL_+AL.+AT -- CRITICAL IGAP--� 9S ECM IM PEDANCE" ADJUSTMENT= .93 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 63 CAP MPEDANCE CREATED= 0 DEMAND (LOS=F) 111 -- X76.. 9� II LEFT CAPACITY USED= '� TURNS. FROM C (CL) W CONFLICTING FLOW .SAR+AT+ALJeEL+HT+ER+DT+DR= 1E05, SCAPACITY iI39 CRITICAL. SAP= 1OSEC. IMPEDANCE ADJ'Us'r'MENT= 0 ADJUSTED CAPACITY ' 0 CAPACITY° USED= 100`, I MtD EDANCE CREATED= 0 DEMAND C LCIS=r• 1 'LEFT TURNS FROM p * CDL..) CONFLICTING FLOW .5B1:?+B1-,W-BL.+AL+Pt+AR+CT+CR 1451 CAPACITY 18 CRITICAL. GAP ? 1.09Ec. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= ADJUSTED CAPACITY 0 CAPACYTY,I USED= 100% IMPEDANCE CREATED= t2`11 1' { ND <LOS=F) 4.81 I r. h I i I I I I 6 I , I i I I I 1', I , r I � I I ISI- n. I IE�T kt� P:E: it ... ,L.ekt4.e1 I � 'INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS „,., INTERSECTION i',Fil' ST I�Y�YLo9 oIi11�YYI1�fYY YYYYIYYYYwYwM.Y��.►Y.L �IYY�YiYYY YYYYY�IIIIY�YYIYi� .Y�Y� ' DESIGN TRAFFIC VOLU, L.,...,...,....,..... , , , , 1 , IES,. ` " . . , , , , I.. i , ,, , H . . , 1, , , ,. . , , . ., .. , , , , ,,,, ,,, . . , ... I, 1 . , , , , ,, , . . , . . , , , ,, , , a. s.ss ,.• , , ,, : , , . . , 10 ...1, :, , , \v., iti,,.0 , / H :_. ,. . 3 , . H. „ H . , , ,., , , iit;i74,......4, , ,H, „,.. ,,, ,.,, ,,,, , ,I ,, , : , , , , , , , , . . , , , 1 1 , . , , „ , , , ,.1 , .. 1 . , , 1,t16 , f N i 4 1REC`ri N, CRITICAL MOVEMEN 1't CRrCALI LANE VOUJMES ,' v `E °A+SESTC . 'NORTH/SCUM' '' ' 41” i 1,x, I • $� H5S �1�� C��' � ITICAI..�AF��'VL�J�"!ES , S' NUMBER OP PHASES 4 , W it. , SII I ,.:.. 7yii ��YYYY++ww��Y} ,y}Yw►��'�YY1� �}YIM►� 'LEVEL�l 'S .CE, 1. Suui f a Cr:tt`cal .. .ara 1Tci1th t Yeye. .air,5i' a,. rvfeiey 'Too,,,,Phase T"hree,, PMasa. Tour„ srr.More...'@has t 900 3$5, 825 i 105'0 100 9 5 a c 1200 . ,40 111 10. a f I.350 PIIS 1Y22', 'ISO4� 14' ,37 ra w .aw - fiat cool taibl rYnl irs. .. ;, ;4‘''"1 .d rl. '''I.*',',' I f y F . A ' i w, LNSTGNALIZEI1. INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET SN EET • t A Street and Set-3oI is lls ,Date of Count Y x� D x Seh� ear 2000 fi.. x x Day of;,Week: Weekday x x Time of Day: PM Peak` xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx cxxxxtxx Preva,i J.ing Speed: 45 13•, • of lanes on major Street 2 A APPROACH GRADES: , ' xxxxxx..xxxxxx xxxxxx,xxxxxx A 0%:E4 0%:C' 0% �U ► / A. Streef x SHARED LANES.. x x APPROACH C: none x C x APPROACH D: none APPRoACH' > >>> > > >A< (<< (<<>>.> > > >)D<'< < < ( ( (> >) > > ) }C< < < < { < <> > > > > > >S( < < < t { { MOVEMENT ;AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR E+L BT BR • OL.Uh1ES ,1 1.0 674 1,06 34 414 10 50 168 EG' 40497 6 PCH i 11 37 455 1 55 185 22 44 RIGHT TURNS. FRC3M C (CR) C . ;2 A�.'^ , ADJUSTMENT= 1 CRITICAL SApFL_laWECSAR�MF?EI�, .�.. ADJ'U� ADJUST CAPACITY 302:ED CAF'AC ITY 302 • CAPACITY ;USED= 7.28%. I MPE1)A tNCt,. CREATED= .95 DEMAND t L.CtS=C) 22 RIGHT, TU Ftt4S.. FORM D (DR) CONFLI(:TING Ft_,OW .SBR+BT== 515 CAPACITY CR.ITI.0'iL 'GAP= ?SEC,• IMPEDANCE. ADJUSTMENT= 1, ADJUSTED CAPACITY 420' CAPACITY USED= 2..62%„ IMPEDANCE CREATED= . 98 DEMAND (LO:fi:MIA) 11 TURNS FROMA (AL) ,LEFT ' CONFLICTING W.'FLOBR+LST- 533 CAPACITY 517 CRITICAL GiAPGEC IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT=` i ADJUSTED CAPAC I'•TY ,517 t.1 CAPACITY,xTY USED-- 2.:13% IMPEDANCE. CREATED= 99 DEMAND (LCIS=A) it LEFT TURNS FROM S (EL) CONFLICTING, FLQW AR. AT,_ . TY 71 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC". IMPEDANCEADJUSTMEN"tt"=• I ADJUSTED CAPACITY '371 CAPAC'I:TY USED-- . 1186/- IMPEDANCE.' -- ,CREATED= . 92 DEMAN10t'LCIS=B) 44 THUR, MOVEMENT FROM'C (CT) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT+AL+Bid...+BT+SR- 1310 CAPACITY 40 CRITICAL GAP= 9SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .91 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 8 `" CAPACITY USED , 513. 89% DEMAND (LCIS=F) 185 IMPEDANCE CREATED= '►� DCMAi� • THUR' MCIVEMENT FROM D (DT) I CONFLICTING FLOW .SBR+BT+SBL+AL+AT+AR �345 CAP A ' 38 cRITICAL_ GAP 9EEC IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT CTNT . 9 APAST D 5 CAPACITY` IhPEDANCECRE TED- a DEMAND (LOS=E) 455 ILEFT TURNS 'FROM C. (CL.) CONFL CTING FLOW EAR+FIT+P1L.+8L+BT+BR+DT+DR-- 3.74 CAPACITY J. CRITICAL: GAP= 1 0SEC.. IMPEDANCE. ADJUSTMENT-- t ADJUSTED CAPACITY CAPACITY USED i00%] IMPEDANCE CL EATER 0 DEMAND LCIS F 55 TURNS FROM D CDL 'LEFT .CTI: `5 AT+A _ T i8 C:CINF� N FLAW BR+BT+ L -AL+ R+CT+CR! i53 CAP ALI CRITICAL GAP= MPEDANCE. ADJUSTMENT � ADJUSTEID CAPACITY 0 CAPAC -' `_ bS--F J�T�' UEt � i�ia� IMPEDANCE CRE9TES�=� � 1�L..t�1A�SI)I 1:. ), ,�� , „ 1, f y i Ak w4• , • xi.. rf{..: .t.we.n..:.. .♦-wf(.rn+.dntttiNa.r}N.w,..u.Mrk rv.-1 S •n+GnN+ vM's. +r ... .rtix-. .r.....'..0 ..;e, r..«a,.:. .,',. m, .f .. '..-.... ....n •........ __ :t 1-w..a. ..n w !c ... .„,..R.:.'1:M 7t UNSIGNALIZED Ir4TERSECTION CAPACITY, WORKSHEET Scht:',i,lls and 8ti.,1.xth Residential Aecfee I,>ate, of Court: Year 0 1 Day �fr Wee Weekda •. ' ''Time. ►'f DA/yr AM Peak xxxx.xxx,xxcxx`xxxxxxxxxxxXtx,kxx Prevailing Speed:, 35 8',- 4 of lanes on rrta,ior^ street : 2 A: APPROACH` GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxx x•xxxxxxxxxxx A t%:B .4 0 *. Scholls x x; SHARED LAN S.• k x; xi APPROACH C:. none x C w Sout!- Access rk APPROACH > >>>> }}A-< < t<<Z<> > > >>> >D< t <G4t« > > > > > >C< {'{ t< 4 <>>> > > >, 5< < < { C{ t MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES ► 36+3 121 Thr .?+ ei' 0 11 E 26 122 0 I PCH t23 29 RIGHT TURNS FROM. G (CR) • Cf NF '.ICTING: FLOW .f 5AR+AT 60 CAPACITY 647 CRITICAL OAP= EEEC. IMPEDANCE' AL?SLISTd'�!EN1`-- 1. AL3JUST'EI:) CAPACITY 64'7 CAPACITY USED t9,01%., IMPEDANCE CR#~ATED.:. .87 DEMAND ("LOS=A) 123 it LEFT TURNS' FROM B (EL) j i CONFLICTING FLOW A R+AT= 3SiD: „ 'r. CAPACITY 826 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE AD:T[.ETMENT- °'1. ADJUSTED CAPACITY 8E6 CAI'aACITY' USED= 3 ...51% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .98 DEMAND (L.OS=A.) E9 ry r ♦ x r r r`x ' ♦w ' n y a♦ { li 1 i ry i tA( S, L.t e . ili '8£ .�.die; I spoilt 3"#tl' 1).1... s1. I I i ( r a 1 I • � I UNSt; tVAI:,.I'ZEPr INTERSECTION. CAPACITY WORKSHEET I h Scoi.l}a� and South' Residential Access Date of C'a.unt: Year 2000 'D.ay of Week: Weekday I .4: Time of Day:, .PM'' Peak, .4 i xxxxxxx.k>'x.xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx Pravai 1 itfi£j Speed: 35 • B # Of lanes on major street 4 APPROACH Gi ADES, . Kx.).C?txxMXx>cxx xttxxxxxxxxx,t A 0%:9 0% :C, 0 ! i SdotoI1s ' x SHARED LANES:. , I' 1� *" x" ,'APPRDACH' C: none 1, ,,. ')t, C, )c South Access ,ri x,41 ' APPROACH > > > :>) >A<.<<< <''.<C>•>> > > > >D�C.<<'< <<<)>> >>) >C'< :t< < < <>.>} > > ?>Dt < <'<.< t , MOVEMENT' AL AT AR DL_ DT` DR CL. CT CR BL ST S"R ''z l o , VOLLUMEs. t' 18 5 ei' IDC° 1, qy , SSE 0 56- ,1:-.200 •,;430 0 64 143 * . RIGHT TURNS FROM C <CR) ,' I � �CONF � ee CAPACITYS 806 . , LRITICA. CAP- 581C. IMPEDANCE. ADJUSTMENT= 1t, ADJUSTED CAPACITY 806 ' i, CAPACITYvEgD-�- 7.94% IMPEDANCECREATED= l... DE!'LAND tLDA 6'4 ,Le... T TURNS FROM B < L> , CONFL.I!CTI`,4ri FLOW AR+AT-=1 180 CAPACITY 1002 qa CR` TICALR AP= .5'SEC . P ANCE. ADJUSTMENT I. A 3JL!5'7EI, CAP(:1C,I,T'Y 1:002' ._' 'CAPACITY' USED=. 14.2 IMPEDANCE CREATED= .9 DEMAND <LOE=A) 140I<<I ,ry r Wsr '•r e�4 �y ir'4�' ur + * I '� i t f r I , r 1, W , y I + � t � � r , I '''* ,,t y.... Le 'e 1 dw"` eir,, e' jIL, I #i+ f�, '. ce. �I n � W 41 fJ�r�" ° il. . '''' 1I. i N. 'AGNALIZED. INTERSECTIf N CAPACITY WORKSHEET Scho I Is and, 'North Commercial Acct, D. x commerc ,a 1. A Date of C'::+:int: • Year 2000 ,g . x x Day of .Week Weekday x" x �° •rime. of Day EIM Peak xxxxxxxxxxx>( xxxxxxxxxx x Prevailing Speed: 3 Bf ' - ' #• of lanes on major. a • p PI .,, APPRDACH, iRAf�ES o 4 xx)t .) csc:�,:cxxx>cxxxxxxx.xxx.,txxx itx A ta% B 0%:,D 0% Schol.ls SHARED LANES: , APPROACH D noote APPRO1:IC4 >.> ).> >>>A,<<<< C,<<>>>>> >>D< << < t <.<>> > >> > >.C< < < < < < 0 > >> > > >B< <.< < < C ( i MOVEMENT AL EST AR DL DT DRCL CT CR LCL, ET BR VOLUMES 33 140 1Zr 1.3. er 16 1 la to 'a 357 _ 24 PCH '3E. 4 f,;t3 RIGHT TURNS FORM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW r.5 CAPAC LTY 840 CRITtCAL.. SAP= :6SEC. IMPEDANCE 369 '� ADJUSTMENT~— 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 840 CAPACITY USED= 2. 81% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .,98 DEMAND CLOS=A) 18 If'' t LEFT TURIS4S` FROM A CAL) CONFLIc.TI'NG FLOW- BR+BD= 38 . CAPACITY 80'7 I.TICRL"CpP= S'EC.. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1. ' ADJUSTED CAPACITY 8.07 ' CAPACZ,TY USED= 4.46% If+NPEDANCE CREATED— .:,97 DEMANNND t LQS=A) 38 . LEFT TURNS, ;FR( M D (DLY-' • • " ' CDNFLICTII.NB FLCI J .5 a $R+BT=-H ..�-AL+AT+AR..CT-SCR- szte CAPACITY ^° ° + `'I IT'ICAL, GAP= 7s4SSEC.w., IMPEDfNCE ADJUSTMENT` .;'37 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 3'48 �R 1'' CAPACITY USED= 4,..1a2%.. IMPEDANCE CREATED= 97 DEtVIA WD (LOS=D) 14 w dw 4 ^d i n Ili I t', t 1.:0eV l +a f Ser" , i 1 1 , 1 l'i II ' • a , } . '. CAPACITY�T R! SEET LINSIGI<iG�.L��.ED INTERSECTIONY WQ { S'cho 11s and North Coammerci a L Acce..'s • x 13 x Commercial A Diate of Count: ',Year 21Z101 , x, x Day of Week: Weekday x x Time of Day: PM. Peak p ,txa� xxxcxx>1x xxxxxXXxxxxx, Prevai 1i.Yig `Speed n 35 of lames on ma j o street: 2 :. AAPP OAC H GR iI ES a )cxxfaxxxxxxxuxxxXxxxxxxxxxxxx A 0%:B i :D et% .i r ^ Sch o l 1 a SHA RED LaNES: '"Ir APPROACH D: ncfle • APPROACH >> >> > >>>A< (< < << <> >> >> > >D< < < < 4< <>>> >> >>C< < < < < < <> > > >> >>S< < < < ( < < • . MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR EL BT BR ' VOLUMES 123 377 12, 3i co 123 iz ei 'a 0 183 31 r . PCH 139 34- .135 RIGHT TURNS FORM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .•5BR+HT= 198,..5 CAPACITY 787 A C R ITI L"AL.. GAP--= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUST'11`ENT= 1. ADJUSTED CAP(1C I TYY 787 CAPACITY USED= '17. 1.5% IMPEDANCE CREA'TED-. 88 1, DEMAND 4LOS=A) 135 LEFT TURNS. FRts?M ,A (AL) ER-s"-ET= E14. , CAPACITY '98,8 i CRITICAL... GAP��I EECU.. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT=CONFLICTING �'- ' ADJUSTED CAPACITY 9'68 CAPACITY' USED= 13.98% IMPEDANCE CREATED-, .9 DEMAND <LDS=A) 135 i LEFT TURNS FROM D <DL) tr ' CDIN#FLICTItNG FLOW .SHR+HT+SIL-AL+AT+AR+CT+CR= 698.5 CAPACITY 276 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SSEC. IMPEDANCE. ADJUSTMENT . 9' ADJUSTED CAPACITY 248 CAPACITY USED= tom..? % IMPEDANCE CREATED_ 9 DEMAND (LOS C) i 34 ', • I I 11 i f 1 , r i II pt 1 f 1 I i 1 I i 1 1 i 1 . r r ' I ('. ' Ii r � t 1 I I 1 , 1 r , •q LC E: Le el ittt 5 e'Vdt WeEltr* •i 15031 dtlt-df . • 1' I • .. AI H ..« .' .. ,. ..., ,r ...:: . .,.:.....v...a .- ., M, i w wun.t. 't:•.u0.-uri.w.,aY+a r C.lN5IGNUAL I ZED INTERSECTION CAFPACI T'Y WORKSHEET . ', 1 4, Street and Scu th Corlimercia1 Access, . ',,, ir , ' 1 , x D ')‹. Cotnmercia1 Ay Date of Count o Year E1Z10 , ' '' r x x Day 0.01 Wee',k: Weekday x'. x T'it ie of bayk, AM Peak. x�xxxxxxx-xxxx':` xxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed 45 ` S . *, ,of'. lanes on major street : ` . , R APPROACH G RAt ES: xx,xx•x• xx�xxxxs acxx)cxxxx>txxxxxxx. A 0% 'B 0%:-b 0% i''' Schcl.ls SHARED LAi'+NE_S e ` APPROACH Do none, - • APPROACH >'> >> >> >A< < <C <'<'<> > >>> > >D'< < < <<< <>> > >> > >C< < < < < < <> > > > > > >B<<<( < < < < M(OVEMINT` AL ATS BAR DL DT DR" CL CT CR BL PT BR VOLUh1ES 5 ., 5E4 fd it a. 10 O 0 0 594• SB, • PCH S, • ta 11 RIGHT TURNSFORM. D' tbR3 i COI`,NFLICTING FLOW .SBR+BT=' 605 CAPACITY` .363 S CRITICAL_ bAP= 7SEC.. IMPEDANCE ADJUST LENT= I. ADJUSTED CAFPACITY X63 ii s .. CAPACITY USED= 3.03% IMPEDANCE CR ' TED= .'S6 DEMAND (LOS=S) 11 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL> CONFLICTING., FLOW BR+BT= 616• CAPACITY 461 ' f- CRITICAL GAP- 6S C. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 461 CAPACITY LUSEI>- 1..3%, IMPEDANCE CREATEb= .BB DEMAND LOS=A) 6 LEFT TURNS FRDM; II (DL) -. ,r .'• CONFLICTING FLOW- .SHR+ST+HL+AL+AT+°,AR+CT+CR 1,134' CAPACITY 47 !1, CRITICAL GAP= t► SEC. , IMPEDANCE AD, tIs T`MENT- ,.9(9- ADJUSTED CAPACITY 47 • CAPACITY' USED=' E5'..5 ti I MPEDArt%iCE CREATED- 41, DEMAND l LOS=E) 1 '12 G. rr a y tlS Leve 1 lin'it' SeV i.ceitt, l ; �� , ' 1tot 64iiii ra.,-.'.f-• • ti, i li �� n 1 . d _ ♦ M w , , , UNS"IGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACIT WORKSHE:E ', A Street' a.nd Soufrh Commercial, Access x D h Commercial A Date of Count: Year' ''.71012100x" x Day of„ Week. Wsekda:y 1 x. x Time of Dy: a PM Peak xxx"xxxxxxxxx x:x.xxxxxxxxxx' Prevailing Capped: 45° 8. 4 of'f' lanes on major street: ,, A. APPROACH `GRADES xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,xxxxxxx A 0%113, '0%:D 0'l. SchoIls SHARED LANES: "' APPROACH D: none APPROACH >) > > > > >A((< (< ({)'> > > t,> >D<< < < < <<> > >> . > >C< <,< < < < <> > > > > > >B< < < <'< < <' MOVEMENT AL: AT AR DL DT DR CLk Cr CR L.. BT BR VOLUMES le 728 0 67 0 its' la e -`� 5� 61 PCH L 74 i is ' i ,', L ' , ''' ..., , , ' '' ' , .. ; , , , RIGHT TURNS FORM` D (DR) , , i CONFLICTING' FLOW .,5ER+BT-- 596.5 CAPACITY 367 CRITICAL GAP= 7SECe IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= i ADJUSTED CAPACITY 367 ` ,. CAPACITY USED= 3% IMPEDANCE CREATEIDS' -98 DEMAND (LC)S= ) ll LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL), ,CONFLICTING FLOW, B ,, .BT= 630' CAPACITY 454 ' •CRIT` IC:ALf. GAPS= SSEC'. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT-- 2 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 454 • CAPACITY. USED= 2.42%, IMPEDANCE Cl'TERTED .96. DEMAND (LOS-C:).),' 11 TURNS FROM �FLIr:TI�INNG' FLOW- .SBR+BT+B3L.+AL�+AT+AR.+iCT+CFS- 1,.3 4.a 5CAP'ACITY` 23 CCM , 1. ..LEF1 rt , LD TMENT= ."CS ADJUSTED' CAPACITY 23 CRI.i �.4CA,_ SAP 1uSEC.. IMPEDANCE A J1�5 CAPACITY USED= 321.,74% IMPEDANCE CREATEI?= 0 DEMAND (LOS-F') 74 } Y * N a•,j r , i , v �1 1r , L`OS. 1:.e s , r' f ,Serer�.`r: I tom. , a • 11' , , I . INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS INTERSEC1"ION'_ t1 F STizss µ`v .. 435+ M . �t1 I TRAFFIC':VOLUMES +� I 1L '., I I II I I , I I I I I 11 ' Q li 11 I I „ r I N I I I it I I M � I I I II I .r � I II I I 1 I I I1 II I ` I I I I I II •I � ti DIREC TICJI . CRITICAL MOVEMENTSCRmCrAL�LANE . �..�..aMEE I E526 IA I 1 ,r4oFcrWs(:)taili"Hr 26. li I ,'• I I II I I I II I � � II 1 , 1 u I I I { 3 M � I SUM' I= I� ES I u C� I�� E�L I I I NUMBER PH ISES 4 r, , I I . I 1 I I , A • I I I LevEt.Oa 5 `VE I T I I I it ..,-, �► .. 4, VoluittetL . ., , Leue,I off `.Ser.ire .Y.Y.. Peit 'Three. roarbt More 'hses ' 1 I , 1OSL 1000 965 rr 111 114 100. fit• 1350 7,. 223 d II I I �. �2s I l Sd��, aieY G�ii. ,. ur",.I'�I• ✓irJ. «xu• 4F'. +•w +AFS.'�i. fir. I ptildII . t�a��4.41��raa�, I <I 11 I qq 1, ' 1 I 1 I 1 i' I I uNSIGN ALT ZED INTERSECTION' CAP AC I T Y WORKSHEET f,' A Street and SW 135th ; I x Dx SW 1:�5th ,Date. of Count Year 2.',:i000. x x Day of Week: Weekday " I x x1Time- of• Day: AM Peak I } ' xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxsxxxxxxx�xx , PrevaiI iig Speed: 45 I I I I '''. B #. of lanes on major street : 2 1 , A APPROACH GRADES: 1 I • : • xxxxxxxxx>cxx xxxxxxxxxxxx A Off..D ►�%�.G ��!.D 0/ 1 • Sta eet xx SHARED LANES: 1111::) I x x. APPROACH C: none 1 x C >c APPROACH D:, none I 1 APPROACH ' ) ) > �> > >A . < < < te « }> >ry > »< < e < t <�'<> >> > > > >�,( < << s < <> > ) > > >B< < r < < r < 11 i �` I, , MOVEh'1ENT' AT' AR . DL DT DR CL CT BL BT HR ' � ALCRI r I I 1 VOLUMES 7 487 1 4.1 1 40 '30 1 21 1160 121 .18 14`, 435 5 58- I PCH ' 8 I 144 33 E 176 133 `01 1 4 lI 1 II RIGHT" TURNS. FROM' G. ' (CR) {1, CONFLICTING FLOW 5AR+AT= 507.5 CAPACITY 425 CRITICAL GAP= 7SEC'. II1PEDANCE' ADJUSTMENT=' 1 ADJUSTED H CAPACITY 425 CAPAG;' .T`F USED= 7t% IMPEDANCE CREATED= . 57 DEMAND (LOS=A) 1 20 I. ' ..- 4 I RIGHT TURNS FORM D. (DR) CONFLICTING. FLOWS -5)3Ft-1-ST=1,464 CAPACITY 453 CRITICAL GAP== 75EC: IMPEDANCE` ADJUSTMENT= 1. ADJUSTED 'CAPACITY' 453 t CAPACITY I USED= 5.J8% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND (LDS=A) 23 1 LEFT TURNS, FROM A tAL.3 ICONFLI.CTING FLOW` BR++-ST=• 493 1 CAPACITY 1 545 I CRITICAL GAP= 65Et. IMPEDANCE' ADJUSTMENT= 1. ADJUSTED CAPACITY 54447.1 TY USED= 1.,47% IMPEDANCE1 CAPACITY CREATED- .99 DEMAND BL) +: $ L�CONFLICTINGOFLOW FT TURNS '''FRfri (ARAR AT 'SE CAPACITY 520 1' •' 1 CRITICALCAP— 6SEC. I�oPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= iADJUSTED CAPACITY520 CAPACITY USED .77% IMPEDANCE CREATED . 99 DEMAND (LOS= )) 4 THUR MOVEMENT FROM C. (CT) I I CONFLICTING FLOW 5AR+AT+AL 4-HL-+-BT+BR 1tal1 i, 5 CAPACITY $? 1 , CRITICAL GAP= 'SSF. C. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .. '48 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 85 CAPACITY USED= X56. CREATED= 0 DEMAND (LC)S=-'F) 138 ; ' 47� IMPEDANCE, CR , THUR MOVEMENT 'FROM D (DT) 1 CONFLICTING" FLOW .SBR+H`?"+BL+AL+AT+AR= 1003 CAPACT,TY 89 1 CRITICAL GAP=S 'MSEC'. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= . 98 ADJUSTED CAPIACIITYI I 87 1 111 �» 3 •_ =E) , 8 CAPACITY USED=- ,�7.'3�� ` IMPEDANCE CREATED= .7 DEMAND :CLOS ' '�' 1 i LEFT TURNS FROM C 1(CL) ' ` 'CONFLICT/NG' FLOW' .:SAR+AT+AL+DL+BT+HR+DT+DR=1 1.06re,'5CAPACITY 58 ' CRITtCtL I GAP= iOSEC. 1 I'MPED3NCE ADJUSTMENT-= . 66 AI►JUSTED CAPACITYe 1 CAPACITY USED--�. 48 .I i6i. IMPEDANCE CREATED= 0 DEMANI (L05=F) ' 1 17$ I 1 • LEFT TURNS FROM D C DL) I �+ F ' CTI G E"Lr'OG�. rM SDR+bT-!�H{Lr�-i�L �-+T-{-:ArR+CTfCR= �i4•,.�, CAPAC��iY I ' 48 CONFLICTING N C . I GAP= ttSEC. IM' PEDANcE AbJUST ENT= 0 I ADJUGTEt) CAP CITY I, A , I , CAPACITY USED 100% IMPEDAtNCE, CREATE' G DEMAND (LOG=E), 44 i l I i I I I I I i i I i I I i I I I I I' I l c d I i i I I i I I , r� II I �u r i rli i I a LOS Le,vtillittf $6t,.vide r a - '. r T 1 IR + 1� 1 4 , INTER E TI?ON ',‘CAPACITY ANALYSIS' i'' F4" STR ET L9 , - i�vTERsETiC�iV �.�a �� t�� - �� M►,,....,.—..,�. ®FSiN. H0UA/yEAR � --#.,.1.-.:,,./...4.-' 2ooa , i' I' ' 1 ' ' — '1 ' ' ..— ' ' ' 'TRAFFIC, V LLUMES:. 1 .9` I r ' 1 J P w l I r , . , DIRECTION 1 CRIT CAL MOVEMENTS CRMCAL LANE VOLL MES , , . EikST/VVEST. .;,7„.>,. , 8 1 `i w Ne�RT1-10auT� � I 1 , , SLIM OF CAMCAL,LANE VOLUMES 1 !,0 S I , ', ' NUMBER P A�a�;ei,.Sta�` i�l. l If LEVEL l.r�OF'�nrt Jnr." I l S limv,�Ceftical 'Lane„Vbitimesr I i iti v” Fh three Fa �e� Phae A. 900�l 855` 825! , ' l 81050; 1000 96S'; , , , , ' 120G i 1149 1100. , .0 1350 X175 #25� : , , i5Ø11 .1425 13 , itcjiiiilit td 40. 104):441-4 o ,,..... ., ,. ,.. ... r »U".. .. . r-.....,• :i _ , , ,p... , ,.... �a.l CI`, ... Y.! , .u,ak, e Ar.l uSw W �.i • UNS.I CNAL I ZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET • St r,eea and SW 135th X D xSW 15th Date of C� . rt» Yea ~ rG�� 4i x' x Day 'of Week: Weekda Time of, Darr:` PM Peak 1 1 , xxx txxxxxxxx XxxxXxxxxxxx IP`i•evai I ig Speed: ;4S B. A of lanes on ,major, street s APPROACH GRADES. ! '. xxxxxxgtxxxxx xxxxx"xxxxxxx fl 0%:B; %.0 'Z1%:D 0% A Street x. x Sh 4RED LANES: x x, 1 C x ,r APPROACH D: Mone PP ZCIACH > >> > > > >fl{{< < < <<> >> > ) > >D< << < < < C> > > > > > > ( CIS{ < � MOVEMENT AL` AT flR DL DT DR CL.. CT CR BL ST''` HR VOLUMES 3 584 138 'Laa 5 (4;: ,5E ,13 GC 534 s� pCH 14 8'9 L45S 1:0'Zi 57 i 4 36 , RIGHT, TURNS-FROM I p TURNS FROM C f,CR} CONFLICTING 'FLOW .;SAR+AT'= sea CAPACITY 324 CAPACITY GAP= 'MSEC'., IMPEDANCE 'AD•JUST1ENTT`= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY `324 ;CRITICAL Y _ ED-- EMAND ( �.,1 US "' 4t.-�E.�" I M!�'EAlRP3�..E v REAT�I? .97 D LOS $) 1� RICHT TURNS FORM, 3 (OR) CONFLICTING FLO i ,.SBR+BT= 5 :1. C 1PAC ITY 397 CRITICAL i�AP= ?SEC:'. LMPEDf1NCE AD'j*LUSTMENT1t4i ADJUSTED CAPRCITY C97 CAPflCITY` USED' 'ir.5:i% IMPEDANCE CREATED= ..9'3 DEMAND {L05=$Y 6 { LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL), CONFLICTING FLO iBR+r.BT 569 CAPACITY 4SE.` • L GAP= SSEC.- :IMPEDANCE:DANCE ADJUSTMENT=t,' aDJUSTEI} CR PRC I TY 49E CAPACITY USED IMPEDANCCREATED= 9 'DEMAND 14 LEFT TURNS FROM CONFLICTINGFLOWAR+AT=• 785 r. CA'PAC'ITY 370 CRITICAL_ GAP='` 6SEC*e IMPEDANCE ADJUSTNENfi=-' 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 370 CAPACITY USED-- 73% IMPEI3At�C;E CREA'T`ED== .93 DEMAND CLOS=$} 36, Th.UR MOVEMENT FROM C (CT), CONFLICTING FLOIn .BAR+AT+AL�+BL_ -BT+8R S B' CAPACITY 4+U C R T wAL. GAPI 9SECb �. I MPE�ANCEADD STM ENT=. 91, JUSTED CAPACITY 38' ,"Y USE15833% IMPEDANCE CREATET.).= 0 DEMANb L:OS--=Fi 57 THUt MOVEMENT 'FROM D (DT CONF'LICTINC� ''FLO 1 . OBR+BT+BL.-i+AL+AAT'+A.R= 1;879.'5 GAPACItY 5 ,.. SECE � .� CR ITI�AL; GAP= 9 IMPEDANCE ADJU�Th1ENTr . 91 ADS„USTED CALF'AC I TY CAPACITY USED- `��' , �.� - 4; J '- MRN VREATED J�1r� Yrs , EDAN V Yr• .LEFT' TURNS 1=`RCM C� tCl..> , CONFLICT,I G ,FL.OW. +flT+AL.- DL+BT+BR+I T-f-DR- ►E CAPACITYr. 1.S 10E AD T 1" CRITICAL'.SAP= IGSEC. IMPEDA. ,, �- IJSTMENT-- � RDJUSTED CRPAC I•T � 0 ` Ct�Pf�C'IT`�r,. USEt1= 00°t DEMAND LEFT TURNS. FRO D CDL.. CONFLICTING ';FLOW , 5 4.•OCI PA. 1 C ITI:CAL GAFF`- SEC IMP.EDAh C A }h..�;.5T1 E+1 ''-- I ADJU'S`C'E ? CA1P i"1'�r" C1PtC ITS' r 1.1Ew, 'i = I MPEDINCE C;REATEI?;= DEMAND C L OSS y 1, 89 11 'I 1 1- P I ; I r i LO S _` Le e,1 f e oe isat' x". ` , 4 4` o I I i I } I { } UNSIGNALIZED" INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET SW 135th and North Resident a1 Access D to cf: Count. Year ti:tZtIZIla Day of Week: Weekday Time. of Day: AM Peak l 'cxx4xxxxxxxxxxxs4)(xxxx)txxxxxxXX Prevailing, Speed:' 35 3 #k of Lanes Pn 'major street : E ..,, A APPROACH GRADES: )txxxxxxxxxxx xxx cxx'acxxxxx A @%.B +�%:C Grp `\', `4 " S4� 135th x x SHARED LANES b. ,:. _x• APPRDACH C's nrzsne C~ x North AG^es -.rMOt�EMENT AL ATAPPROACH > >> > >? >A:1f`< <<(<<>>> > > > >•E�< <C< < t <> >> > > >>CC<< { <'< <> > > > > > >'B<.< ,< < < < AR DL DT DA CL CT CR r,4L :. BT BR VOLUMES !S 77 w E Vit. t a 121 14.. 3 eels ei PCH 9 15 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR') �..r CONFLICTING FL4.11h 'r. 5AR+AT= 78 k. ., CAPACITY" 916 CRITICAL, GAP= 6SEC.. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= f.1. ADJUSTED CAPACITY 918 CAPACITYUSED= 1 � 54� CREATED- . 99 DEMAND t LGA=A 3 15 l r LEFT TURNS FROM' 8 (BL) K » CONFLICTING. FLOW A +# T- B` µ . CAPACITY 111- 5SEC.. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMEMT---= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY CAPACITY USED= .2.7* IMPEDANCE. CREfATEb 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 3 ,,LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) +BR+DT+DR= 884 CAPACITY S 7B CCINFLTiCTINC;° FL.t')W- Sfi1R+A�`+AL..ESL.+&T CRITICALSAP- ?.MSEC" IMPEDANCE T1JJSTENT" ADJUSTED CAPAC I TY 538' CAPACITY USED= 1..67% IMPEDANCE CREATED- .99 DEMAND t LC S-A 7 '.. 1. } i i la I it i 11 I I If I t I I I I', I, � L...0 �. " s (Mit rat.► i ." "I II � f _ r ' 1 :, s _. , ., ,• . ..,., UNSIGNAL I ZED INTERSECTION CARS"AA,,;�X TY))WO RKSHE ET1 SW. 135th and North Residest^tta li Access r • ,Date of Count: Year' 2000 Day of Week: Weekday A, •' .'; y . T`ii�t� of' Day,. PM Peak � xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxacxxxxxicxXxx Pr�evai iirig Speed: WE , H. # of Lanes on maj ctP street: a 1, ' „ A APPROACH GRADES: xx{xxxxxxxxxx x xxx cxxxxxx A 0%:B 0%:C ► ti i SW 2 E t x SHARED LANES P, x. x.. APPROACH C: none ,, x, C x North Access APPROACH > > > > > > )A,<< << < <t> > ) > > )>D< < < << C<> > > >> > )C< < < < < <:t> >> > > >`>F,< < < < < < c • .,... MCI EMENT AL, AT PR ` DL DT DR CL, CT CR >... 9`r. BR i, VOLUMES 0 2.12, 1 0 0 0 4 0` 6 1°, i PCH 4 7 8 i; '' i RIGHT TURNS FROM' C (CR) i CONFLICTING' FLOW .SAR+AT Ei6..; CAPACITY770 ,, r il CRITICAL GAP,.'"-- ESEC., IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT- i ADJUSTED .C:APA�G'ITY 77_, CAPACITY USED=" .,91%- IMPEDANCE CREATED, . 99 DE '!AN p (LOS=A) ` E LEFT TURNS' FRGM 9 (BL) T CONFLICTING FLOW, AR+ATS 22.1 CAPACITY 959 CRITICAL. GAP--= SSEC v IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT 1 ADJUSTED CAPAC I T'? 9 i9 +II US ED= 1.,'88%, IMPEDANCE CREATED- 99 DEMAND (LOS=A) 1 i, LEFT TURNS FROM C C.CL) S�31CINFI,CT'INGFLOW �:EAR--AT+AL+BL+EiT+SR+DT+IR= 316..5CAPPx7�D 58' CRtTICALGAP= ISSEC.. IMPEDANCE ADIUSTMEN`T= 98 AXPJUSTECAPACITY CAPAC''T ' USS= ...'79% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DE&IAtND (Los=(;) 4' , I . ,1 k 0 ' I II r , , SI I �t r. fc �"A , 1, ,L S Lvre1 o et"v±. e I � �I ; 3I , I , •, ,1 4,II Y4L..i lY d4. t. k ua•h < e.,, -I ,. , a» t,l.. 'eti „a,.a u x+..u::w,x.. ,.i.. .x.a ora. .wes.,..ocau ts.««i UNS'IImNALIZED• INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET • r u A Stree,tt and Std Morning H i 1] D ,x Mor nthg, Hill Date of Coi..m.6,: Yeats SOON ., x Day of 'Week,: Weekday at Time of' Day: AM Peak „ xx x.•exxxx: ocxx. xxx.xKxxxxxxx. Pr"evai 1 its Speed 45. • B Ianes, ,h Major etr t: E, Ai APPROACH GRADES: x)(-xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'xx'xxxxxxx.x)tx A; X17 B 0%;D',0% A St r-eet SHARED LANES: 'APPROACH D: hone APPROACli >> > > > > >A <f; 1i I " IP.} � 1J UNSISNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET A Street and SW 'Morning Hill - x D x Morning Hill Date of Ct L.Lrt: Year 200 x x Day ' f Week:',, Weekda!r x. x, Time of Day:11 PM Peak x,(xxxXXxxxxx, xxxxxxxxx1txx+ Prevail rhg Speed : .4,.5' B 4 of lanes on 'n,aJUr• _I tt-eet : 2 A. APPROACH VRADES: xxxxxxxxx)(x)(xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A '0%:B "o%:D 0 , 't, A 'Street SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: none - APPROACH > >:> > > > >R< < ( C< < <> >>>> >,>D< < < < << <> > > > > > >C< < < < < < <> > > >> > >S< < < < < <( MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL, CT CR EL ET" BF2 • VOLUMES 65 .4.',".3t 0 2 0 E8' 0 0 0 0 560 5 PCH 7a a 31 RICHT, TURNS FOAM D. (DR) of CONFL,,ICTIN FLOW . SBR+B'f= 56Ee 5 CAPACITY 389 = , CRITICAL. CAP-- 7S�C IMPEDANCEADJUSTMENT.-z;- 1. ADJUSTED CAPACITY3e9 ',' _ . CAPACITY USED-s• ?.ST% IMPEDANCE CREATED , 94 DEME ND (L.OSrB) 31 • LEF=T TURNS FROM: A, cAL> CONFLICTING FLOW BR-t-BT-= 565 CAPACITY 495 CRITICAL.. CAP= SSEC,. IMPEDANCE ADJ'USTMEAJT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 4'95 ` CAPACITY14.55% IMPEDANCE CREATED= . 9 DEMAND (LdS=A) -72 USED= �' I' LEFT TURNS FROM D (DLA i CONFLICTILVC FLOW. .SgFt+BT-t-F3L,+AL+AT"+AR+CT-i.CR� 1 o5.,5CAPAC I TY 39 CRITICAL GAP= i09SEC:/ IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= C3 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 35 `'. • IMPEDANCE CREATED= .•98 DEMAND (LOS=E))' ' CAPACITY USED=, 5.'71.n,,,_, i i, 11 it • ii '` goiett ,kk kCHr ��i. 1 `L .8 '' L VI in Se"vie d " I' P.I. I •wee,. ._ Y e f ♦ 0 I r R • . . ,N.„, - •• , x .. i... ._... :fi,.....;, ,...r p, .wc L., >:+.>.c;a,7ai'tae�u r+ , i''' UNSISNALIZEA INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET . SW 135th and South Residential Access i,,'_ Date of Count : `leer, 2000 • Day of Week: Weekday • M: . i Time of Day: AM Peak xxxxxltxxx>cxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Pr�evai l ing Speed: 45' ~ B #fit cif lanes on ria j� r» st r,ee ti. "Q . A APPROACH GRADES a I " xxxxxxxxx>cxx xxxa +cxxxxxx)t A. ,0%:B 0%:C 'Z'% • SW 135th x x SHARED LANES: xt x APPROACH C: none x C x South Access APPROACH( > >`> > > >A< <"< << < <>>> 1 > > >D < << < ( < <> >> > > > >C < < < < < < 0 > > > > > >B< < < < < <I, • MOVEMENT AL ;-IT' AR DL DT DR CL CT CR r3L BT BR VOLUMES 0 534 7 , er a 0 31 0 42 11 395' Vit, u, PCIS 34 46 12 r„ RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) ; CONFLICTANG. FLOW ,,,5AF-.+-AT= 537.5 1 CAPACITY 406 CRITICAL GAP= 7SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1. ADJUSTED ;APACTTY' 405 CPPAC TTY USED= 11.33% IMPEDANCE CREATED= . '9w DEMAND (LOS=B) 46 .1i1, LEFT TURNS FROM S (BL) . f ... 7R �.. a , 51 1 , w CJNFLTCTI.NCx. FLOW� t..�tA�f_ 541 CAPACITY ,r► CRITICAL GAP= GSEC,. IMPEDE'INCE aMD"JUSTMENT= 1 .ADJUSTED CAPACITY 511 CAPACITY USED= 2..:35%; IMPEDANCE CREATED= .98 DECiIAtlID (LOS=A) 12 ' LEFT TURNS FROM C , (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW- .SAR+ T+AL+FAL+BT+HR+DT+DR= 943:5' CAPACITY Si ,. x C'RI'TICAL GAP= i0SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT .98 AD:7UETED CAP'AC'ITY 7"9 -' 1 CAPACITY USED= 43.04% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .'85 DEMAND (1..,OS--::E) 34 1 lootit kadt4c? It Ito l 1141.4.3 ,` Lt:i8' l.; Ve,i. Cv"r Se't'Vi Ce , , H , 1 1 / • " ♦ . • ' - .' " - , 7,1 it, UNSICNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET ,,.aW 135th and: South Residential Access Date of Count: Year 200 Day of Week: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak I . x x Prevailing Speed: 45 xXxxx>cxxx B 4 of lanes on major street: ,.... ?C}1?�Kx�tJt3t!{}C'hY}�XYt}{MX 4.: A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxx ,,txxx xxxxxx A, et%.5 0%:C 121% SW 135th , k SHARED LANES: x x APPROACH Cg i'1onE? tr 1 ,.. x C x South Access, APPROACH > >>> > > >A<( ( << ( <>> >->> > >D<< (( < ( <> > > > > > >C< < ( <<< <> > > > >> >S<< << < < < MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT DR VOLUMES 0 555 38 0 0 0 17 0 13. 34 572 0 PCH 19 14 37 polo," RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW f.5RR;+AT•= 574 CAPACITY 8 ,.: CRITICAL GAP= 7SEC.. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 382 CAPACITY USED- 3T:.66'% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 97 I DEMAND (LOS=8) 14 . LEFT TURNS FROM E (BL). CONFLICTING AR+AT= 09.E CAPACITY 475 CRITICAL GAP= 6'SECa IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 475 ; CAPACITY USED= 7.79% IMPEDANCE CREATED= ,95 DEMAND CLOS=A) 37 • LEFT' TURNS. FROM C. CCL> CONFLICTING FLOW ,5AR+AT+AL+9L+BT+BR+DT+DR= ' 1180 CAPACITY 45 CR;;TICAL CAA=, OSEC.i, IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT'= ADJUSTED CAPACITY 4 tY. 9 F � CAPACITY USED= 47,.5% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .61 DEMAND (LOS=E) 19 i , ♦ k , ,IR +. 4�M�. yyam,.y,yy,/y pp��rr�� yy�,��Y± rt 14o�CAtl.'kf tcH.14°,4 r ("mak 1433. • LOS .4tLe . , wf Sere « , ♦ ... .. 1►_. '' Vim. J .: - ,' ,N. ; • 14' • • • • • • • A Ez I+d'!i' K C oi=1 iteszt PCZ. " Cett it-z fit. • • e i Al 4 w t CALCULATION FOR D ISTFNCEBETWEEN s,' SW 135TH AND MORNING HILL DR 4 L. i CRITERIA. EASED ON ADEQUATE LEFT TURN STORAGE AND BAY TAPER LENGTHS. i ' SPACING (1)= . STORAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR SW 13TH (E) - STORAGE, REQUIRMENTS FOR MORNING HILL DR (2) + COMMON PAY TAPER LENGTH (3) SPACING' - 5I FT -- 75 FT+ E4o FT M, 365 _FT . I t (1) DISTANCE MEASURED FROM WESTBOUND STOP BAR AT SW135TH TO EASTBOUND STOP BAR AT MORNING HILL. DR ..: 1 (2) SEE WORKSHEETS ,,,,•' (3) 0. 15 FT/FT; 16 FOOT MEDIAN .. h 1 11 J . 1 1 t, , ,„ . _ xia* 't xtcH,,ri.L i r "O rw �� n+"q I - � _�. A }. Y "L..-✓', 44 x CALCULATION OF REQUIRED STORAGE ka ON THE EAST APPROACH OF "A" STREET AT GW 135TH (SIGNArI ED INTERSECTION) > Assumed Cycle length 120 seconds or 30 cycles/hou > Highest 6 minute period during peak hour equals 17% of peak hour flew. (i) > Estimated traffic demand. 33 v/h } Cars served during' on cycle of peak 6 minute period h ,. v/cycle. (2) >, Estimated saturated traffic flow of the two lanes: 3200 v/h ,y . . ii > Cars arriving during, green phase:. 2X 33f3E00 --= 0 c/cycle Cars in' queue at start of t'"`een 2-0=2 cars a > Storage length 'required: ECars x ES ft/car= 50 ft. 1 s (1) From field cbservat ions ' (2) Assuming LI,vµeh .cles car be serviced. V I. M a a F C • • CALCULATION OF REQUIRED STORAGE ON THE WEST APPROACH OF A STREET AT SW MORNING HILL. DR. � 11It r ( UNSICNALIZED INTERSECTION ) • • PEAK LEFT TURN DEMAND: 65 VEH. /HOUR OPPOSING VOLUME: 560 VEH. /HOU R REQUIRED STORAGE LENGTH: 75 FT (1) ti; (i 3 HARMELINK, HRR ail ,, . 3' r il x ro , a 4 ar • I - y-.+-•r..,"� 7 i, CJF41.,,n"'�.•.,.. L.7.Tiiu ,.: t,..<� 'ISI'.:7rTr .:. ` ]Y i •) �" _ � t.. .L _ C..,_..:it3 }11\ ...x.�,.... �.,r yy{ •,�/..„.,111, ',.,} +��.:^.t�' ( ;'� . . ,w«a`r�ktr'«Ot x w.tt.""t..�. u.r� ,r •:� ✓ �r,•y'�� t f- iiilr?"4-WI'',2___:.t: Z 7, • �lkflt��,,"'t+'"" Miit yr{,.,-„Ixt6 1M.a �J • IR. N~CI«"' .,,----..",:-.. -.......471E: 1.' YM.b' aMw. 4r IYN -,.\ Ill.- r 1,\\ PN• [ , 7. r ..�. �, #t J,.«, it ,a ,�,r„ -. \, `,;' ✓Kt \ }, �C,.' +�1.,41•.�" •.t•�' . ti[\_..vir5i.:q. �� 4x aY • 'c�'t9t«Y� �:._ilt,,,..�tt C' �, %1 � ,.t:�, -i`}"'"!"� '�?::'�. {.. ,`tsa i ,: y to kt.. �..'r',p`' �•w•«rr"arr�, �. : .�)`(r LxY/ r.rw.,.rte «; l'. "�,tt-.,,,- ,.•u � i-.n4t'h��""'ar �i lar F. t .:' .k*: � a.� }I ;,..1..t:::,7,-. � �n,,;4 C�} 1-+• �*" �C^yt;" !1"I n�to "' L._. ra''t ��y��i�1�r. �. �.L�•' .� �'� '\.Ir y i FIJIiLlfr- (�y� • �i I N.IyU. •,r.I ,i. I.t'k"«,�rl`w`Tht.y),.i:j` . " , \VV'i-^ '„F sir�„Al-' C l..Sw Vim.., C 16,.\ ; .. t�O DIY rrr "L^,+ .. .i . i :VI ..r' w.r'I'f�� Iy� wM�. �ll}.. I/Cra. I.rlil alw i(4•f� �'" !b 4Ya 4 E1L- TL* �#''I n�" '! :r-ti.`,";,....::'' ,r* t- �r 2 r i, . ..i ,y}� -.T \t Y':4` }}. „ x .t Y-F./41v; q..o 1 h.Y• ::: «4N:: l� A . ..,'+1�, «� "_.:, ut � `...;�V'""�� 'i.:. �" r"�'#"wY`r .tix:r•Y. �°��"l49 ,.'1tr«w++r. �tyc."}.�„r,r t ., u.;te�.�nri:.., J- ,s M.Y:a«w,, 4 _ t ._...,RI 1.31I ( `. x I 2 ;., M tl, i C:. t ( ..';,q- "`• tip y Ili t�� -.Iv- � 7 � (�4''/,,,,.t."-' � ( �� 1 � 4 � � «vsg �� 2votL.t /a 1 � r t r �� "�ISS• t'�t��."�*I' tP��w �E r�� Iw A7 rY Ilp} ,..)21.,,,,i,,,:$11747 NYx al r „...,_=1/4,,..] p. w,orY w y r. A • �""tY«. t t =' i s+YmOLt, ;y \� D'�,� \ --•••••,:r..4:-1.-1.jr�"U wn•7•V:�"'«4 i'6.+.e Ki�4'I tr* r +)IYr.. i u q .y4 `,r- ..."'"�S e..t L ; p 'y «' 7J ��a�,,y . 7�r1 Ir `•w "L. UY.3N k t 1 -.� ~.g}I�.aK./k lk hY� �rl.« t 'Fr.f� Y 3 .3 Ktx«7 • ,-}^-�r?��}!t^^•�.�...,,t 4 a}' } �.' �nu .,_„43,-.....1, -•+"y "�c,.,/ ` Y t I 11.w •t w i (NI. f t c '" 71 •t„, (;„" r "JY,,1 i Y r t �' Y ` 'l \•"• � 1 � 111//J NJ r ter, t }•, ... tL.� _L,L��,rL. ``rF�C��. n , [' rt -n �:� l...i1' 'R s t ; �..4.r. # art} ;�°a�}J [.^ � .. � 1 au I." , L ti.. �'/f,' (r-, it.T. � r.'.-.ty11I!k•M✓(['}I•it;. ��1°e..}t .�� «a.e mrMxri� -11:r------' D 1 aw� I,+ .��. `...,„„7","''''-'"---'7.1'1'4,'".""'' ..`-xK,. «+rrrt . .t'=! it =a. �1 aw... i }ka L4tt^�pi.#h29 Uwe ( r r «ed...vitt, p 1 Kf a `,i:", . :... o J 4 1 .� ». ,1 0 e . _ �` �___.5_, .,J.,„1„.. ::!'"/": : i OA ./ 1Iy' 1. R 't aY: ,y.4-.II.:., tir Y 1' t a . M..r.x4 Nor • -"�Y`•.�• "� r.`i } •r.,+,it" Di' a {\'�" �`124.."t x*. .V..I w ('�}�4t',YOiO}tbi�f q444,,,,,,^.^O 'fir it LJ +YtAi.IYII..` \ GYYIN.. ��r, :1I, a - _ J] R ..,t y(',(l, lta y� L._ l.J ` , ... i -`" , .1 r*.•,1�ac*3g� q„, - °O�x ._4.,`� t. ,,.+'�' +r1�`rr,uq4,� i Y.r.r1 . w«.t•rltlAh01n rr�a- .4r.:.l�.rwl..�« .. Kt # �..-^rl'. •� ..Yr t,;�C .rr ....L'� � � .�. �tx 11w ..,,,[1:71,,} i '' ,uu*n ��r �.1, _�. 'K" ,„,.,,,s,. .,„,,,..„.„.. _:..t x -.... ,._� t ,�� . ... �y. � '� ) `�\ �� 1r�=-•rel �+ iliir. Cr i X i "'� ../ t ,i i t {.t .-Ji�{(7 " _ t. , ,,..._ 7' 4 , �i'_,,D , .a_4 v, ,,,, ,�,�,,,_ „,„L.l1 , .,tr '1* y... ..i .., 1 D�( J:}'"-1.�7 I tq,tltiC,,,gi+ e. qv, J^ n itk >m'-• '""`."_L' :tS" C..�! cs......„7/ "" rir n r 1` y ,• « t.« lxlt"+".I 1 ii.,,«,,...J1 if cl . i ..., .,, UY4 • F. Y1,e we\41 N.. �' r4 1 r�,,-��1I W '1 11 ,.:-..FR-4 1-f�! �,YJ' 'i :IC!'.f•' wt t;( h a w2 o«. t4 1..t + � y • xw««n '�.:.�J 1 'F Y.... ^.�„7 4. R'�r t� : '�._• ♦ It�# r y,''�i�i(�lr� �t ^.i+N •' t i+$t 9ia }�-�,t .y .� ,'Lt��gHVYt u4 U "r� d 'Y � �a L ♦ M1 1 77., li al + •L.]LJ 1 Y. " . v. � 1 M A .{Iltw It,/ (/a�kt.N�b ..rl ,rrr,,,,w��))�''1,•, �,MI • <L 8>ItTON - ,*�.o I A e e �Lr..,, ii .Ji+{j a :, , r ,,,M*-4 , «I4..,nf , Jam",. I 1-1 y"'i'raa--,., (7«" i cgtl4.laMUr' L.f;+ 11.t«a a . 14 N or` + :,'r f"`.,'.�'.Y! '" 1 y;.., 7 �Nw.'+p� r.' i 4.' i.}}I« « -`�` Y�ttNiAC ,� �. �LtJSdt�.3K r")Lr4ty}n�. t•} `u\ �� , ,:,' � ,1 ,r i, •F (! W ] 0 Yh1.lxalLLl ,...r,":'1442;. • V1,4.aap , ; i t t . 4 i. III „*�� * ,, it �',,* t,:l @""t1 L� ''«� --LF-_,,,,c, tiLYl, L " ' r C ,,,, .iR1tC th "s . e cmi r.+' '� IF {1 V ' r Y.«t \„�v. 4 :4,i.. « ,,,,,.1,7•2. IrW6 Y,uti 7 t i �� M.t'1 tY tta*�„ 1t'� 1i 1-"'�a F' ,r ° I' *at' 71 I y r�♦ / S*""r^:4 .,.• �'Irp. C'' :. : / v • 1 �V 4 ♦ yam" . - t 01 9. o \ , , ‘...........\. \\,,,,,, log , .. 4 t1 yt1 t1 1,1 ya <`xt t M1}ss'tix'txt q. s{ ss S st�..� , 1 ' F rl�:.� 'R,yM1 ..;.....,,....11::...,::',."...",,..1;',ii{ s4 �f ' tii.K•.:�ttM1 4 l �it1 f `, I yii ste f .. - 1 t t T It ax s t q �jy,. 1 ,.. • GENERAL T CASE No. GE ' ?k NERAL APPLICATION FORM CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 RECEIPT No., Tigard, Oregon 97223 «- (503)639-4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY: , PROPERTY ADDRESS , ' Associated Cases: A r ► + LEGAL DESCRIPTION T- Lo-t 101 2S1 Lot 1 000,--4.4ap 1 ES1I 33C INTERNAL PROCESSING: ' ._. _ ,Accented for P',.c-App. : SITE SIZE 105. 1 '7 acres total (3. 5 acres under. consideration) • .11 PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER Margery Krueger and others By: ADDRESS 1 Box 792 PHONE Fit. ---- Pre-App.: CITY Beaverton, Or. 97007 ZIP 97007_ Date & Time: APPLICANT* Ruse Krueger 12225 SW 2nd. =— F. .° ADDRESS Ave. PHONE 6267 1 .,_. Accepted for Decision = CITY Beaverton, Oregon ZIP 97005 Where the owner and the applicant are different By: e t people, the FP purchaserrecord or a leasee in Hearing Date:applicantossession withwritten from the owner or an p The written g� •authorization. Hearing Reset To agent of the owner with written au authorization must be submitted with this application. 2. REQUIRED LETTER OF AU''iORIZATION IS ATTACHED DYFSNO Decision; filed & mailed Thi : APP.' 3� IS APPLICATION INVOLVES' Tk1E OLLOWING• FEE FILED PAID Accepted for Appeal: P eXt. . Comprehensive Plan Amendment, -- .yr fr om ,'- 'O7 t a 6 _.. B '`• quasi--judicial legislative lath g' } e Date of Hearing; Zone Change from to quasi-judicial legislative DESCRIPTION: ed U it Develo meet Comp. Ply., tion: P'lana n p P1 nUei concept plan detailed plan Subdivision � � � No. n Nl'O Major Partition 4 rr ?' Zoning District Minor Partition Des ign Revie v in Conditional Use 'Zoning g Sa p No Variance to Zoning Ordinance «� _ , '' \ , t . tloi 7 3 c (Title 18) Quarter Sect on No. Variance to Subdivision Ord, x w ,. „.per^�j • • • � - �. ..,,.. ...r�. ... ,... . ; STAFF NOTEti: (Title 17) Sensitive `Land Permit p.S: Floodplaius Drainag ewa ,s 1111111111 Steep Slopes 1111111111 Other • f I , A' +.x u.. v t.'M.ars ti tia tr.x:s ti...XU t r.M„A"1s'►"f "b. 1' a y,t A'..h Y..s._ 7R► s,.,-..,.t. ...,r....,. .."....... ..«. ...t w-� { CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon. 97223 - - (503)639--4171 , SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT FOR STAFF USE ONLY Notice of t Response 4 DISTRICTS A . S- 'es `o I Yes SCHOOL DISTRICT Beaverton No. 48 WATER DISTRICT City of Tigard Wash. Co. Rural Fire fist. No. ' M f ETRE DISTRICT :,.,._.. .�.,..... , ,. PARK DISTRICT City ' of Tigard UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY - Sewer Avai3..ab.le: YES NO , OTHER 5. PUBLIC UTILITIES ELECTRICITY PGE NATURAL GAS Northwest Natural Gas 7----r7--7 , TELEPHONE ` GTE' OTHER .., ;' 6. PUBLIC TRANSIT (TRI MET) NEAREST BUS ROUTE AND STOP 1 mile at Soholls Perry g.t .. Sorrento Roads 7. OTHER INTERESTED AGENCIES (SPEC/FY) Washington' County Planning & Publio Works 8. CHARACTER,CF RE,.AREA EXISTXSTAFF, NG LAND USE, PLAN -DESIGNATION ZONE 'VERIFIED EY • NORTH. Vacant 8t` S.F.R R- C R-20, SOUTt Vest R-20 U BAST Residential Sub. R R-5 j` WEST R-1 R C I y: * µ e' a aworr »k.>u« ,.� uu„r , �.o• .•_,u«n .. r kdY ' " + rt u.ye t w tr .... x • GENERAL APPLICATION FORM - PAGE 3 CASE No. ;, •. ,. CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 * (503)639-4171 9. CHANGES IN THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA WHICH AFFECT THIS APPLICATION. Please Discuss: No Physical changes have occurred in the area. However, new information is available on a proposed' alternative alignment of 135th Avenue and Scho is FerryRoad. If the alignment proposed by the applicant is chosen by the Citi and ount , then the commercial areap pthis County, should be relocated. as ro o s ed with application. The Washington County and City of Tigard. Comprehensive Plans call for a commercial facility at the intersection of the east/west road which :. connects 135th and Scholls Ferry Road. - .4 ',, 10, DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE . Lot Area (acres, square feet)n 5a.cros • 11. EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE SITE Square Distance From Property Line Use Feet North South East West :one NAT 'RAL CONDITIONS 12« Percent Si pe� . t , 13.. Vega tat ion Types: erage Diameter Per lent Of Each it es No Size Of Trees W.. . . ; Per Size Trees: Brush; .-, Grass:4 I"1o► ► ns,* Ilow much oa the site is ti in floodplain? r Courses What type? Wath 16. Rock +Gu to.r oppings • 17. Other 1 8. Pro.osea DeveloRmemt, , ease hwiefly describe the proposed deve .opent: e:l.ghtiorh.00d, Corminneris l sho , Center Il t� a small ;roper storeandneighborhood ood shops. gyp. notat F . _ '. h exact sizeknown ' isr this time. H w v r totalsquare feet of the h "n, s wou * e .. ou 40*000 square feet. .4. ., ON P ORM -- GE .. CASE No. �>;+��v��.�L APPLICATION�. CITY OF TIGARD., 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)639-417 19. The following is C:1s is not required.* ' 20. Overall Site Development Residential Commercial Industrial Open Space Other Roads Total 4 ' No. of acres 40,000 40, 000 or square sq, ft. .; feet per use square f e t Percent: of 25% 4„ „ site c cnre rite _. _. 21. Type of Residential Use and Characteristics 1/ of Bedrooms/t nit Type of Use 1 of Units EFF. I 2 3 4 Proposed Density 22. crecreational w where applicable , please explain how the open space, , common areas and facilitieswill be maintained. All `these facilities will he maintained by the owner of the commercial lot. Some perimeter landscaping may be maintained by homeowners associations Specific plans for such maintenance have not occurred so far. T 23. if the proiee.tt is to be completed in phases, please describe each phase of the project„ This development p prr,bahlY will not occur for 5 to 8 years into the future. It will probably be developed in one or 2 phased. Some small convenience shops maybe developed Priorto a grocery store. '':lease submit the following with this application: 1 , Written General Narrative 'number as required by Planning Department. 2 ,Proof ofership 3 Letter of a f authorization "K � � applicant it not, ovnerr. • 4. Tax Map * Staff vill identify for you, whether this section is to be compieteda, r " O. 41. f GENERAL P ATION FORM — PAGE 5 CAS11 Na. CITY OF TIGARD,, 12755 SW Ash, P© Box 223397 ; ,K Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)639-4171 I .' THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE AS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT, SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF EACH HEARING.ING (e.g. Attorney, Surveyor, Engineer �r , Notice Notice. Re•ort Decision o.f Reviev i ;.. , Name Rues Krueger . I t 12225 SW 2nd Ave. Su' - 2$ Street , C . Rei ver rn State _0 Zi. • i 'Brien _ •'' Name Ryan O , Street 113,4 SE 23rd Ave. X X r X city Hilisbero ',StateOra zip 9712 `` P "�' NciTl�e Street • city State Zip Street r City State Zip ;.. ' ; APPLICANT , OWNER p • • , . . ,.... . , • , -,..(,:s .. , IN/ 1 . ... ,„ , ,. . ,0 ,.. ,...,. , 90 .,. .,, t . C..„. • • ^i• n „ LI 6 ..„,..........,,.....0. ,,,,. i ..,., en. U) i 0, , . ,. iik,.. .. ';., , , : , 1 ..1 ' r:.,....,,-. :. .0:0.,....-r,-...,-,,,,,,.:,_______-----. . 3 3 pr :2.c..),o. , , ' : 1 , , , i ..i. , 1 1..,....... „.e..41:.-,......1r/e. otR,, ,..,„,, .....2 ,242 ,, , , , 1 , ,, . 1 ,.. . . ......, , r ..,...,,., , .s, / , -3,, 5 pic..._ ‘0340,14-zt . ''' � ` 6 'i' ' ' ' ' 1001P*'''' .......1,-,, ,, , 4.- i ,, ,,z.,:„,,,,,,e,„,,,,',, 3 1 • • j �. ' '#'12... 5v , 1.i ill__ 1 ,,,,,./00.,.. , ... , . •r,„. , ,.. . 4 . , co ... . , , , , , . - 'w-i/ D v‘va,s 0 • ..z, .,„„ . , , .., .. . . , . ., ... , 4 .,, , .. - 4 - ..., , , d..1 .4 . 1 Pr L,U T J , , 5 . .. ........ . . , ..,..,. 1. '-3 '1'2 0 , 4 i gel ."' , .,,.aR, , ' ~. e... „„,,,,„ ...., rim., M._... 4 ,'-' L./ ' ) . , , 2 5 1 , I\ T3' O ,.. .. ., , .,.. - , . .- ,,,,,,,-, . ..._ . . , . , • , ' :: -, ,-44. '‘.,... 6,,t, itelics,,, 14,ell• 0 , ' '! + , w"' r « ''''''""*F 1,,,,t, ,,,Lele' ', '1' 1 I, .2., '. 7S '''',;,- : =w • ' :..'' �,' ,' tri.+ �. Ili 45 , ( i4rt -a. irtAA , . �' • , y 4 . - :tint,.--74-F TIGARD - -- - - . --- -,--,---.----,----- --- -- ---- --- (r----- ..tom- m S.W.ASS - 4.5 - tet-,_ ` 19 +s ' . p}�yip � _ ?) i,,,,,,, IV. ---' L '''''''' ''''''' '' / ' ''''-'''T'' t'j 6tAtt'''tf.'I --tti letir*If't T''' 1----' --' - ' - - - - - -1_.:::_;,-....._--..___7- y 44 - ...- - 1,1.3 __ _ :, ,.. __ _r.,,,,, - _, A _ _ . _ __. ___ __ _-.._--- ..,.: - _ _ ,..., _ _ - _ _ _ _- - ----__, _ . .- - . , _ __ „ . _ _ . . , __.,... , L i_ ci, _ _,„,__:_it vii� _ . .. --,____ _.(...) . __,, _ _ _ _.„., , _ , „., I- .- , , _ . . 6 ,,„?..,- , .,,, _._ - - --v.v..„...)f- - oi,,- . _ . . i . - __ _ _ _ ,,,0- . .- ..........-_ - 4--,-, , . , . _ _ _ - S' -- ' -- - S---) . 1--** - * - -' ' - ' 1"--D, , 1:.z,z%4,e,,,,0,/ „./ ) - -- '-':, - . -,_,- . , ,,, - .-: - -,, L-:.2,,S--- , - - , - r 1 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]