Loading...
City Council Packet - 07/26/2005 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 26, 2005 COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED I:\Ofs\Don na's\Ccpkt3 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 Agenda Item No. 4.1 For Agenda of 8 -23 -OS COUNCIL MINUTES TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 26, 2005 • STUDY SESSION . Mayor Dirksen called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. City Council Present: Mayor Dirksen and Councilors Harding, Sherwood, Wilson and Woodruff. > DISCUSSION OF THE CITY'S USE OF L/STSERV Network Services Director Ehrenfeld and Network Technician Sears distributed and reviewed information about methods to e-mail notifications and information -to Tigard citizens. A copy of the information distributed to the City Council, is on. file in the City Recorder's office. Two options hosted by outside companies were reviewed: 1. Listserv.- A listserv, or list server., automatically sends messages to multiple e-mail addresses on a mailing list. When someone subscribes to a mailing list, the listserv will automatically add the address and distribute future e-mail messages,to that address along with all the others on the list. When someone unsubscribes, the listserv removes the address. 2. RSS - "Really Simple Syndication" is a method of providing website-content such as news stories or software updates in a standard format. RSS content can be accessed with an RSS-enabled Web browser or other programs designed for retrieving RSS feeds. ; After discussion, City Council consensus was for staff to implement both Listserv and RSS. These services will be announced to the public when ready. At Councilor Harding's suggestion, Network Services Director Ehrenfeld. advised he would look into making City Hall contact information more visible on the City's website. . > ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS • Review of Pilot Neighborhood Program Map Assistant to the City Manager Newton. reviewed with the City Council the proposed boundaries for the Neighborhood Program and the three areas selected for the pilot program: .COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005 page 1 1. Area 1 - An area served by the Beaverton School District. 2. Area 4 - An area located in "Metzger." ; 3. Area 8 - An established area that includes part of Summerfield and an adjacent neighborhood. Assistant to. the City Manager Newton advised she will be meeting with people over the next six weeks. The current Neighborhood Program map shows boundaries outlining 12 areas. Assistant to the City Manager Newton said the name of this program has,,, not been decided as she thought it would be good to solicit ideas for the name from program participants; 'Mayor Dirksen said 'he~would like to see a formal "kickoff' of this program; he suggested a picnic event. . • Procedural Review by City Attorney for the Quasi-Judicial Hearing City Attorney Ramis reviewed the quasi-judicial hearing process for the;.:,k appeal hearing on tonight's agenda (Agenda Item No. 4). Highlights of ' this review are: W The City Council will be acting as judges with regard to the interpretation of the Tigard Municipal Code. q> The City Council must disclose ex parte contact; which includes site visits and if a City Council member has formed some opinions about the site because of'the visit, this information should be shared. The City Council's decision must`be' based on criteria. q> The City Council may impose, conditions. q The applicant will testify first. The hearing is de novo, so new evidence can be introduced.. If someone asks for a continuance, it is up to'the City Council to decide whether to grant the continuance since the first evidentiary hearing was before the Hearings Officer. 0-> Application of the criteria should be consistent with reasons represented in a factual way. COUNCIL MINUTES= JULY 26, 2005 page 2 There was a question about Measure 37 issues.." Applicability to this hearing will be discussed should the topic come up during the hearing. . > If.the City Council determines its interpretation is different from that of. the staff and Hearings Officer, then'.the.procedure will be to make a tentative decision and direct the staff to return with findings af.. a future date for City Council consideration'. It would be acceptable to,ask the prevailing party to draft proposed findings. • University of Oregon/League of Oregon Cities survey of advisory committees. Information was distributed to the City Council, which is on*, -file in the City Recorder's office. Interim City Manager Prosser reported on this study on advisory . committees to learn how committee approaches to process and decision making can improve performance. Researchers have asked to survey members of the following, City of Tigard committees: 1. Citizens for Community Involvement 2. Downtown Task Force/Commuter Rail 3. 'Park and Recreation Advisory Board 4.' Library Board . 5. Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force A report summarizing the findings from the study will be available through the League of.Oregon Cities. If there are an adequate.number of responses to insure confidentiality, a summary of findings for each city will be reported. • Strategic Planning Retreat, is tentatively scheduled for September 30, 2005. The retreat will start at noon at Councilor Sherwood's home. If someone wants to attend and ADA access is needed, Councilor Woodruff said his home. could be the alternate site. • Council Calendar: o August .9 Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Town Hall o August 16 Council Workshop Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Town Hall o August23 Council, Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Town Hall o August 30 ,5th Tuesday Council Meeting 7-9 p.m. -Tigard Water Auditorium o EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard.City Council'went into.Executive Session at 7:11 p.m. to consider employment of a public officer and current/pending litigation under ORS. 192.660(2)(a)(h). COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005 page 3 Executive Session concluded at 7:.23 p.m. 1. BUSINESS MEETING - 1.1 Mayor Dirksen called the City Council & Local Contract Review Board meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. .1.2 City Council Present: Mayor Dirksen and Councilors Harding, Sherwood, Wilson and Woodruff... 1.3' Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports: None 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items: None 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION ■ Gretchen Buehner, 13249 SW.136th Place, Tigard OR 97223 testified that Washington County does not intend to do upgrade or repairs on roads. She suggested that since the City has annexed areas on Bull Mountain up to 133`d Avenue, the City should consider acquiring ownership of Bull Mountain Road from 99W 'to -133rd Avenue so it can be. brought up to City standards.. The Mayor advised that this was something to consider and said this should be brought up during the capital improvement process later this year. Interim City Manager Prosser suggested this might be a topic for discussion with County officials who are scheduled to attend the August 16, 2005, City, Council meeting to-review the issue papers prepared for Bull Mountain. ■ `John Frewing, 7110 SW Lola Lane, Tigard, OR 97223 advised he had two issues: 1. A junkyard located at 74th and Cedarcrest - Mr. Frewing said that after years of neighborhood complaints, neighbors came to the City Council on November 30 and asked for enforcement action. Mr. Frewing referred to a decision by the Municipal Judge in April. The imposition of a fine was delayed 30 days and then delayed again for another 30 days. Mr. Frewing said he will not be able to attend the August Fifth Tuesday.meeting and he wanted to make sure the City Council knows.the. situation persists. Mr. Frewing asked for a response to the most recent a=mails to the\,City asking why the City has not yet compiled the compliance history on this situation. Mayor Dirksen said he has requested information from staff. The Mayor advised-.he understands'the Court has found the COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26, 2005 page 4 property owner in violation of the Code, which has resulted in fines and imposition of a compliance date. In response to a question from Mayor Dirksen, Interim City Manager' Prosser . advised that it was his understanding. that the Judge has ordered the property owner to come into compliance and set a deadline. The property owner°continues to show progress towards compliance, so the Judge has extended the deadline. Mayor Dirksen commented-that he was surprised that the Judge granted another extension since this has already been tried; however, this is the Judge's prerogative'. Mr. Frewing said. he wondered whether the Code has ever, been enforced "in this area." 2. Mr. Frewing- noted his second issue relates to annexation. He said that people from. Bull Mountain have complained that the. City has not looked after. them in past years. He said the same thing, exists in the Metzger area.. He refereed to the Washington County-City of Tigard Intergovernmental Agreement that calls for,each entity to review developments in.-vi the areas of interest, Bull Mountain and Metzger. He reported', there will be public hearings in the coming weeks on a development at 82nd and Cedarcrest. He asked the City council to direct staff to review the development carefully to see that it serves the interests of Tigard. Mr. Frewing said Tigard has an interest because that area will be eventually annexed to Tigard and the "...right thing for Tigard to be doing now is to be keeping its eyes open and looking out, making sure the Washington County approvals there make that area. decent when the time comes to annex Metzger.,..'! He said he was specifically interested in making sure that the Washington County'approval provides for the Ash Creek trail to go through this area. ■ Follow=up to Previous Citizen Communication Interim City Manager Prosser reported that on. July 12, 2005, Bob Storer, John Frewing and Gretchen Buehner.offered testimony regarding concerns with the criteria under consideration for the purchase of park land and/or greenway property by the City of Tigard. The Park and Recreation Advisory Board is reviewing this matter and its recommendation will be submitted to the City Council for consideration. COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26, 2005 page 5 Youth Advisory Council President Rob,Williams announced the items1isted on the Consent Agenda items:. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: 3.1 Approve Council Minutes for June 21 and 28, 2005 3.2 Adopt a Resolution Declaring the City's Intent.to Participate in the City County Insurance Services Group Self-Insurance Progra"m - RESOLUTION NO. 04-48.-A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY OF TIGARD'S INTENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CITY COUNTY INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP SELF-INSURANCE PROGRAM 3.3, Adopt a Resolution Extending the City's Workers', Compensation Coverage to City Volunteers RESOLUTION NO. 04-49 -A;RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE CITY OF TIGARD'S WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE,TO. VOLUNTEERS OF THE CITY,OF TIGARD 3.4 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement for Membership in the Office . of Consolidated Emergency Management (OCEM) in Washington County Motion by, Councilor Sherwood, seconded by Councilor Woodruff, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote'of Council present: Mayor Dirksen: Yes Councilor Harding: Yes Councilor Sherwood: Yes Councilor Wilson: Yes Councilor Woodruff _ Yes 4. CONTINUATION FROM JULY 12, 2006, OF PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI- JUDICIAL) -APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION ITEM ON APPEAL: On April 25th; 2005 the Tigard Hearing's Officer held a, public hearing to consider an application for conditional use approval to ' construct a 22,500 square foot expansion ofthe existing church and associated parking in three.. phases: As part of Phase 2, the applicant . COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26,'200,5 page 6 proposed to relocate the existing driveway on SW Gaarde Street. The Hearing Officer adopted findings approving the Conditional Use Permit and Sensitive Lands Reviews and denied the requestedAdjustment-to the access spacing standards. An appeal was filed on May 25, 2005 by the owner and applicant, on the basis that the Hearing's Officer misconstrued the applicable law. More specifically,. the appellant's argue that the Hearing Officer's decision failed to balance the approval.criteria. LOCATION: 11075 SW Gaarde Street; WCTM 28103DC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. REVIEW CRITERIA BEING APPEALED: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370 and 18.705. a. 'Mayor noted this is a continuation of the Public Hearing, which was opened at the July 12 meeting. b. Description of the matter before the City Council: Associate Planner Tracy read the above description of the matter before the Council in this public hearing. C. Legal Counsel Process Review: City Attorney Ramis summarized the quasi-judicial land use proceedings' key points of process and procedure: The staff report on this hearing, has been available for viewing and downloading from'the City's website and a paper copy of the staff report has been available in the Tigard Public, Library for the last seven days. The Council's role is this hearing is to make a land use decision under existing laws. The Council cannot change the law for the land use application now under consideration. Any person here tonight can offer testimony. Please wait until you are asked to speak by the Mayor and try to limit your remarks to the applicable approval standards for the application. Members of the. _ City Council will be asked at the beginning of the hearing whether they have any conflicts of interest. And, if a Council member has an actual conflict the Council member cannot participate.. Council members must declare any contacts about-this case with a member of the public. Council members must also declare if they have independent knowledge of relevant facts, such as a visit to the site in question. The Coun'cil'member who describes ex parte contacts or independent information may still participate in the decision. After the discussion of conflicts and ex parte contacts, any person may challenge the participation of the Council member or rebut the COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005 page 7 statements made. The Council member in question may respond to such a challenge. Tonight the staff will summarize the staff report and then the applicant and those in favor of the application will testify. After that, witnesses who oppose the application or have questions or concerns will testify. If there is opposition or if there are questions, the applicant can respond. The Council members may also ask the staff and witnesses questions throughout the hearing until the record closes. Comments from the audience are not part of the record After all testimony is taken including rebuttal, the applicant may make a closing statement. After the record is closed, the City Council will deliberate about what to doabout the application. During the deliberations, the City Council may reopen the public portion of the hearing if necessary to receive additional evidence before making a decision. You may testify orally or in writing before' the close of the public record to preserve your right to appeal the Council's decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals. Failure to raise an issue clearly;,.,:., , enough so that the Council 'understands it and can address the issue, precludes an appeal on that issue. Failure to raise Constitutional or other issues related to the proposed Conditions of Approval, with sufficient specificity to allow a response precludes an action for damages in Circuit Court. Please do not repeat testimony offered by yourself or earlier witnesses. If you agree with a. statement of an earlier witness, please just state that fact and add any additional points of your own. Also, please refrain from disruptive demonstrations in the case.. d. Declarations or Challenges City Attorney asked: - Do any Council members have a conflict of. interest to report? None were reported. - Do any Council members wish, to. report any ex parte contact or information gained outside the hearing, including any site visits? Council members. Harding and Sherwood indicated they frequently drive by the site.', Mayor Dirksen reported on July 12, he had a telephone conversation with a Church staff member who wanted to discuss .the issue. When Mayor Dirksen alerted this person that the . COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005 page 8 Council would be acting in a quasi-judicial manner and anything discussed outside of this hearing would be seen as prejudicial, there was no further substantive. discussion on this matter. -.City Attorney Ramis said the statements by City Council indicate to the public that the Council is generally familiar with the site. If' there are specific facts that a person wants to .bring to the Council's attention, please feel free to do so in your testimony. City Attorney Ramis asked if there were any challenges from,the audience pertaining to the Council's jurisdiction to hear this matter,. or is there a challenge on the participation of any member of the City'Council. There were none. Mayor Dirksen reminded the public that he officially opened the hearing on July 12; therefore he did not officially "open" it tonight, because :it was already open. e. Staff Report: Community Development Staff Associate Planner Tracy advised. essentially there was one element= before the City Council as provided in the Development Code, which was access management. The access management strategy for arterial roads requires that driveways and streets be spaced no closer than 600 feet apart. Associate Planner Tracy noted that at the last meeting the question was asked whether an agreement could be reached on this matter. He said one of the reasons why "we meet here tonight" is that:in the Hearings Officer conditions of approval within.the final order there is no provision for emergency-only access only for the disputed. driveway location. Staff has concurred.that this was an inadvertent omission by the Hearings Officer and staff agrees the condition should be modified as shown in Exhibit B of the draft, resolution. Associate.Planner Tracy then addressed the request for opening up the driveway access for general public use. Staff has outlined a response to the issues that have been raised so far in a memorandum to the City Council dated July 22, 2005. The criteria for the adjustment request cannot be met in this situation since there is , an alternate means of access to a lower classification. street. Staff has examined other options, including the applicant's offer to,.' limit access during certain time periods. Unfortunately, there are no provisions in the Code to allow these.types of mitigating trade-offs.. ; COUNCIL' MINUTES- JULY 26,'2005.. page ,9 The.staff s position is also consistent with the City's Transportation System Plan (TSP). The TSP was adopted in 2002 and acknowledges that such restrictions are often difficult to implement.., Associate Planner Tracy quoted a section from the TSP: "Access management is not easy to implement and requires long institutional memory of the impacts of short'access spacing: increased collisions, reduced capacity, poor sight distance, and greater exposure to vehicle conflicts. The most common opposition to access control is that, 'There are driveways all over the place with closer, spacing than mine...' These statements are commonly made without historical reference. Many of the preexisting driveways that do not meet access spacing requirements were put in when traffic volumes were substantially lower and no access spacing criteria were mandated. With higher and higher traffic volume in the future,'the need for access control' on all arterial roadways.is critical. The outcome of not managing access properly is additional wider. roadways, which have a much x greater impact than access control."' Associate Planner Tracy said one of the arguments that might be presented to the Council was that there was access on Gaarde further up the street. He advised the Council that Engineering staff was available to respond,to this,.if necessary. Associate Planner Tracy said the appellant argues.that.the Hearings. Officer misconstrued the.applicable law and did not balance the criteria for granting the adjustment; however, if the Council determines that, the adjustment criteria have been inaccurately applied, then staff would seek direction as to how the criteria should be applied. Without such direction, the problem maybe that this Type 2 process, which.contains limited discretion, will contain largely discretional criteria, which would more appropriately be a Type 3 process involving a public hearing: Essentially,. what this would be leading to is a modification of the Code: f. Public Testimony - Applicant Representatives: Dave Smith,,Attorney at Law 6950 SW Hampton, #232 Tigard, OR 97223'.1. COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26, 2005 page 10 Jim Wilson, Project Manager. 14357 SW 90th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Steve McCracken, Senior Pastor 16412 SW Luke Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Attorney.Smith advised this is a simple case of the Church requesting a new driveway access for a safer exit and for access by the Fire Department. Attorney Smith reviewed his statement in support of the appeal, A copy of Attorney Smith's Applicant's Memorandum in Support of Appeal is on file in the City Recorder's office. Issues included: The Code language is ambiguous. • Safety issues. are present. • Assertion that the City Council could interpret the Code's ambiguous language and approval could be granted becaus&• the requested. driveway would result in, safer access. • The Hearing's Officer recognized that the 110th. intersection is . hazardous (sight distance and traffic speed on Gaarde Street). • Staffs concerns can be,addressed by allowing limited access on Gaarde Street; i.e., allowing access during specified days of the week and time of day to coincide when members would be attending services. • The Director has the authority to move driveways,on adjacent streets; i.e., access adjustment. Attorney Smith said he would be happy to draft the findings if the City Council should choose to reverse the Hearings .Officer's decision to grant the appeal of the Church: Project Manager Wilson testified that the Church expanded its parking lot to relieve on-street parking-on' adjacent streets. Existing driveways are located at 110th Avenue and Gaarde street. The proposal is to add 'a second driveway on 11 1 0th and to relocate the Gaa* Street driveway 140 feet farther west from the 110th intersection from its present location. He said the Hearings Officer concluded the access point on'110th Avenue was all that was authorized by the City's code and that any driveway on Church property accessing Gaarde Street would be too close to the 110th intersection. Mr. Wilson said the Code. prohibits driveways within 600 feet of the intersection without a Code adjustment. All of the traffic COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26,'2005 page 11 from the Church that needs to, go on Gaarde Street'would, therefore., . have to'go through that intersection. Mr. Wilson advised that the Church wants to work cooperatively with City and its.neighbors and make the project an asset to the community. He said that they sincerely believe'that the driveway on Gaarde is the best and only way:to make their project such an asset. Since the Fire Department insists.on the Gaarde Street access, and City staff supports this emergency access, he asked why the Church" could not use the driveway to attend worship services on Saturday evenings and Sundays. Mr. Wilson said that the Church's traffic engineer says the Gaarde Street.driveway is safer than having all of the Sunday traffic coming, through the' 1 loth intersection; the Hearings Officer agreed. The 110t" Avenue intersection has poor visibility. He said staff suggested the solution to this problem is to improve that intersection. Mr. Wilson said the Church would do that, if it could. 'The Church's traffic engineer and the Hearings Officer agreed that trees and shrubs in k,. front of homes located on 110t" Avenue are what restrict visibility. Those trees and shrubs are on private property,, not City right of way) and the Church understands the City Would not condemn that property for'that purpose. Besides, removal of those trees and shrubs would destroy the buffer of Gaarde.traffic that this vegetation provides to these homes.. The safest, easiest, 'and most reasonable.solution to the problem'is to . allow the Church to use the fire access on Gaarde for Saturday evening and Sunday worship services., He said they would keep the access gated to Fire Department standards during the.week and only open it for the above-mentioned Worship; times. , Senior Pastor McCrackensubmitted a Written copy of his,testimony s. which is on file in the City Recorder's office: Pastor McCracken has served at the Tigard First Baptist Church for the last 12 years. He said the decision the City Council makes tonight has great implications for the. Church and its mandate'to serve the community. He.noted that the Church has been at-this Tigard location for 50 years. ' The Church has been, and continues to be passionate about this city. For nearly five decades, and before Tigard became a City, the Church has sought to be a benefit to the City. Pastor McCracken said their church and the other churches in the community exist to give to the City and its people. They have always helped the homeless and the hungry and the hurting. They-respond to need whenever and wherever they see it in the community. The Church gives financially to.ease the strain and struggle of citizens COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26, 2005 page 12 through food, rent, and utility assistance. Most of.the'time, recipients of such humanitarian aid are not'from their congregation, but from'. those.who walk in from the neighborhoods and community and ask for help. He said the Church is trying to be a good,neighbor by . relieving the impacts to 110th Street. He referred to past favorable responses from. the Church to the City.of Tigard, including granting easements. Pastor McCracken advised another way they give to,the community is that they employ four full-time pastors for the youth, children and young adults in the community:' They patronize businesses in Tigard. Nearly 500 regular church attendees shop at stores, eat at' restaurants and conduct other business. in Tigard. He asked for the City Council to seethe value#hat the Church adds to the community. They feel the closure of the Gaarde Street entrance would greatly obstruct their positive presence in the City. He said the Church is growing, just as is the City, of Tigard. Part of their growth plan is aimed at the very issue being discussed tonight: ~ cars, traffic and congestion. He said their.first priority is to reduce any adverse impact on their neighbors who live on or around 110th Street, which borders, their.Church. Their plan is_simple - build more parking'to get the cars off the street and into .a lot. Pastor McCracken'said it is their desire,to ease the'street traffic impact on their neighbors6 n-110th, however,,is sure to fail if the Gaarde Street access.is eliminated'. Therefore, it is their strong belief that their expansion project, which includes retaining a relocated Gaarde Street driveway further from the 110th/Gaarde intersection, is, by all means reasonable and appropriate. Pastor McCracken said that'for many„years, the people of Tigard First`` Baptist Church have responded favorably to the City and the Council on numerous" requests. They'are asking that the City demonstrate the same kind of willingness to. assist them by granting the. variance as they continue to serve the people ofthe City without undue, or unreasonable restraints. Senior Pastor McCracken submitted petitions.with more than 300, signatures supporting the Church's request for, Gaarde Street access.. The, petitions are on file in the City Recorder's office. Proponents • Bibianne Scheckla, 10890, SW Fairhaven Way, Tigard, OR 97223,, testified she was :not a member of the Tigard First Baptist Church'. She asked that the City Council not'close driveway COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005 page 13. access for the Church on Gaarde Street, which,would only place:., more traffic on SW 110th, which is a neighborhood road. She,said the City widened Gaarde Avenue so it would hold more traffic - and now the City.wants the traffic on 1101": This is the exact opposite of nearly closing North Dakota affecting 121St Street. She referred to a driveway for St. Anthony's: cemetery, which contradicts the purpose and the dispute of this driveway on Gaarde Street as,proposed by the Tigard. Baptist Church. Shea asked that the City Council allow the driveway on Gaarde Street as well as the driveway on 110t" Avenue. Both.driveways are needed, mostly for Saturday evening and Sunday traffic. She noted a reference was made to the fact that the speed limit is 35 - mph on Gaarde; however, at the Church's location, the traffic is still traveling at 20.mph, because of the school, zone. Kit Whiteman.', 9530 SW'Edgewood,'.Tigard, OR 97223, testified that she and her husband have. lived in Tigard for 44 years. Their first :home in.Tigard was on Gaarde Street. They lived next door to Mrs. Tigard and across the street from the Gaardes. She said .t , they began,worshiping at Tigard First Baptist Church in 1961 ands:., the Church has made,every attempt to be good citizens and neighbors. When the Canterbury apartment complex was.frst built, the City discovered they had built a sewer system that was totally inadequate to'serve the needs of that large of .a complex: This necessitated_a sewer line and:d.uring that process, the sewer had to go through~the Church property. At that tirne, they had a 'verysmall. congregation.an'd the-financial impact was significant; however, they decided that in order be a citizen of the community,,- they needed to comply with what the City asked them. ' The use of the property has been` limited because of the sewer location. The property's use. has been further limited because of the bike, path . -that they agreed to allow on their. property. Ms. Whiteman said that with the many contributions made by the . Church to make Tigard a better place for people to call home', :she said she feels that now it is the. City's turn to listen to what their needs are. They have tried to always comply andido what' they've been'asked to do. The access drive has been in. existence for 44,years or more and. she does not want the Church' to lose it. The proposed Gaarde Street access creates a better traffic situation because it greatly improves the driver's visibility. The 110th intersections is less safe. 'The inability,to see traffic- . wascreated when the City decided to align,Gaarde Street with McDonald Street.' She asked the City Council'to allow the Church to keep ifs'access on Gaarde.'Street. There is a need.for rules; . COUNCIL MINUTES - J.ULY,26, 2005 page 14 however,'.this is a situation where increased safety along with logic and commonsense should prevail. • Ray Griffin, 14175.SW 93~d Avenue,.Tigard, OR 97224, testified that during construction of SW Gaarde Street, Mike Mills of the City of Tigard Capital Improvement Team told the Church Property Commission that they would receive their new driveway and that it made good sense to pour the driveway ramp before the sidewalk was built so the sidewalk would not have to been torn out. Vannie Nguyen, Mike Mill's supervisor, also told Mr. ' Griffin that the Church would be allowed anew driveway, but that they might have to give up the existing driveway. During the construction *of Gaarde Street, the Church allowed the Cityto store dirt on their property. The Church did this in good faith that the City was working with them on their needed driveway. The Church also worked with'the Capital Improvement Team when an underground electrical line was placed on the 110th sidewalk property without a utility or construction easement and,, again, they felt they were doing the right thing since the City was working with them on their driveway. When Gaarde was finished, the result was that the existing driveway on Gaarde is now too steep and Tualatin Fire and Rescue District says the current driveway is not acceptable. The Church decided it would make due'unti1 they relocated the driveway. Mr. Griffin said it does not seem fair. or right for one arm of the . , 'City to make promise's to a landowner causing the landowner to act in.good faith to accommodate the City's needs and then for another arm of the City to break those ,promises- and.,take away an important feature that the landowner has had for years. Mr..Griffin said the Church's request is logical; reasonable, and increases safety over present conditions. After so much good : . faith effort on the Church's part,,he said,he hoped the City Council would .see the potential injustice in this situation and find in favor for the requested variance. . Councilor. Woodruff asked if the agreement cited by Mr. Griffin earlier was a verbal understanding. Mr. Griffin said it was a verbal understanding. He worked with staff in the field'and the. Church moved a, retaining wall to accommodate the driveway to .be poured. It was a last-minute decision when they were told the driveway ramp would not be poured after they had already made the adjustments in the field. ,Mr. Griffin confirmed there was nothing in writing. COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY, 26,2005 page 15 • " Gary and Jeanne Henry, .1411 SW 120th Place Tigard, OR 97224. Mr. Henry advised they agreed with previous statements and had nothing further to add. • Larry Vonada, 16352. SW Cromwell Court, Tigard, OR 97223, said he agreed with what has been stated regarding safety. He said he emphasized that the spirit within the Church is to be a good neighbor and he would like to continue to be a good. neighbor to the people on SW 110th. Part-of the purpose of,the Church's project is to get cars off the street and into.a parking lot so it does not. create further and additional traffic, problems. • Frank Charbonneau, Charbonneau Engineering, 9370 SW Greenburg Road, Suite 411, Portland, OR 97223, said he would be available for questions. He said he is the traffic engineer for the project. • Bruce Anderson, 11205 SW Gaarde Street; Tigard, OR"97224, said he is an adjacent property owner and,has lived at this location for about 35 years.' He asked for the City Council's support by allowing the requested access. Mr. Anderson said it seems unreasonable to restrict or take the driveway away. He said the proposed relocation of the driveway would be much safer because of better sight distance. He added that the Church has. lived up to being a good neighbor and helping the community. Mr. Anderson said he is not a member of the Church, but has lived next door to, them for a lot of years and they always been good and cooperative to him and, when there have been problems; ,they have been resolved.. Opponents: None Rebuttal: None g. Staff Recommendation: Associate Planner Tracy reviewed a couple of points raised during testimony. He said it was important to note that Tigard First Baptist serves as an anchor of the community and the City appreciates the Church's efforts. Associate Planner Tracy noted the City has. approved the conditional use expansion and now this is more'a matter of how the City'manages the public streets for all members of the public. Associate Planner Tracy referred to the increased volumes on Gaarde Street. Associate Planner Tracy noted Mr. Wilson raised an issue about sight distance at SW 110th and Gaarde. He said. it,was important to note that it is a requirement of the COUNCIL MINUTES -.JULY 26, 2005 page 16 approval that the sight distance be improved to the extent practicable. There are other situations where sight distance problems existed and the developers in those cases had to lower the road, obtain easements to trim hedges; etc' Associate Planner Tracy said he understands there is an existing sight distance problem, but there are two requirements being placed on this decision: 1. Regarding access, which is being discussed at this hearing. 2. Sight distance - it is a requirement that the Church move toward obtaining better sight distance. It may not be possible to get fully complying sight distance, but he noted it was within what was-allowable.. Staff is recommending the Council adopt the draft ordinance that amends Condition No. 30, to reflect the allowance for emergency access as shown in Exhibit B and uphold the remainder of the. Hearings Officer decision. h. Council Discussion Councilor Sherwood asked what triggers limiting access when it is already in existence? Associate Planner Tracy said one of the items reviewed was whether the non conforming access would "hold some ground here." When are you doing development, the issue of access is raised and you have to satisfy the access standards. The non- conforming chapter requires that if you're relocating or altering your access or your non_conforming structure as in this case - it has to be rebuilt in a manner'that conforms to the Code., Therefore, what has triggered the restriction on the access is that the Church has proposed a development that requires Conditional Use approval. Councilor Sherwood asked if the construction on Gaarde did anything to damage their current access. Associate Planner Tracy said he believed the applicant would confirm that it did. When the Capital Improvements.Team constructs a street improvement project, it is not considered development and it does not go through 'a development review process. Reconstruction of.anyone's driveway is not part of the land use review; therefore, the same standards do not.apply. In response to a question from Councilor Sherwood, Associate' Planner Tracy advised the current driveway on Gaarde Street is too steep for emergency vehicle access. It is too steep because of the widening project on. Gaarde. The Church is proposing to relocate that driveway about 140 feet further west. Councilor Sherwood asked that if the City destroyed their access so that is not useable, are we not beholden,to allow it to be moved? Associate Planner Tracy said, COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005 page..17 'We are still looking at how. the access standard is being met. So whether it was in its current location or in a proposed location, the adjustment criteria, the spacing, criteria would prevent that access from being on Gaarde." Councilor Wilson noted that Mr. Smith raised an issue about Fire Department access and the fact that they are allowed to request access on the basis of safety and yet, he did'not think anyone . argues that the new proposal is safer than the access. off of 110th Avenue. He asked for clarification of the Code that allows Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue to demand an access when it is contrary to our spacing requirements. Associate Planner Tracy said he would need to take the time to research the Code; however, essentially the justification is that when there is an emergency crisis on a particular. parcel, there is added safety measures (lights, sirens). It would not. be a normal situation where a driver would come up on a driveway not see an emergency vehicle entering or leaving the site. There is not that kind of notification for drivers in a general access situation. Councilor Wilson said he served on the Planning Commission for . eight years and said it is the City's procedure to follow rules with the,, Code. He said it always' puzzled him that the City would, receive comments from the Fire Department, TriMet or other agencies and sometimes these comments would have the'force of law. At times this seemed arbitrary or subjective. - He asked, in general terms, is there always an objective standard that is written? Associate Planner Tracy said the Fire Marshal must follow the International Fire Code. The Fire Code provides that access be provided within 150-feet of all portions of the building. When they do their site plan review, there is,,. . a Code and process that they.follow when submitting comments. During the City's process of reviewing the development, staff is also in contact with the Fire Department to work out issues. What ends up before the City Council is a blend of the City's Code and other codes . such as the Building Code and Fire Code. There,is a standard that is applied; but it's'not necessarily in the City's Code. Councilor Woodruff asked whether there was precedence for looking at applications distinguishing between anew development vs. the type of development under consideration tonight. He note the . change being requested,will'put the Church. closer in compliance with the current Code, although not fully up to Code. Is there not some way that the Code allows fora different level of reviewing how things must be met. Associate Planner Tracy said this was a similar frustration of staff as the staff reviewed the Code to determine if the non conforming section of the Code, would, allow this request to be approved since the proposal would bring the situation on this property closer to conformance. Associate Planner Tracy suggested this COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005 page 18 might be a section of the Code that should be "looked at." Councilor Woodruff agreed this should be reviewed. Councilor Harding asked, whether the City had a traffic engineer review this situation. Associate Planner Tracy advised that, yes, Frank. Charbonneau was the traffic engineer. Councilor Harding said the Church's entrance is "pretty well destroyed and it's quite a steep one now, compared to what it used to" be. Redesigning that street impacted them.greatly. I am also under ` the understanding that part of the reason. Gaarde was widened to such a degree was because the bond went down a few years back and in order to have MSTIP funding, we had to make it with bike lanes and the turn lanes, etc; , which greatly impacted their driveway and their parking ability...:My guess is they'd go to 600 feet, but they can't because they would be in the creek or.the wetlands... And, I don't think it's a matter of the Church not wanting to comply. I think that it's impossible... Associate Planner Tracy responded that a conforming access on Gaarde would "put them off of the property." . But, Associate Planner Tracy said, if you look at the adjustment criteria, it is possible for them to comply and that is what staff'has recommended. The unfortunate thing is that the method of compliance means that all the driveway access should 'be shifted to SW 110th Avenue. Councilor Harding noted that SW 110th Street is a. residential street. She said the Code does not seem to make 'a lot a sense for this location based on what she has experienced at this location. Associate Planner Tracy suggested -that one way to look at this, in terms of the access management strategy, is to limit turning movements. Every time a driveway is added, there is another point . for conflict; however, if you map out both directions of travel and the cars-coming in and out along with bikes and pedestrians, there are up to eight points of conflict with each driveway. The general stance is to reduce the total number of driveways on arterial streets. Pacific Highway is a great example where there is no access management strategy and this has caused problems. Councilor Harding noted some access management has been proposed for the driveway through the installation of.a gate so'that the driveway would not be used Monday through Friday. She asked if it might be possible to monitor this. Development Review. Engineer McMillan said the proposed gate during the weekday time periods would be limiting access on *days when there is no traffic to' limit. When the free access is wanted, on Saturday and, Sunday, to Gaarde Street (which is an arterial) vs. the weekday traffic, which is lower. Traffic would be held back at the COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005 page 19 wrong time. At that point, the emergency access would not need to be gated. Mayor Dirksen noted that a concern was expressed in the staff report that if that opening were made, people would be able.to 'use it as a bypass around the intersection between Gaarde and SW 110th Avenue. If the City restricted the use of that to a limited amount of. time then that would limit or eliminate.that ability. This would be an argument for keeping this as a restricted access., Mayor Dirksen noted that staff and the applicant have brought up the issue of sight distance at the intersection of SW 110th. He asked' what was the sight distance like if they were to use the entrance on Gaarde Street at the new, proposed location - how does that compare? Traffic Engineer Charbonneau said that at the proposed access point further to the west on the Church property, the access would conform to meet the sight-distance'standards. Mayor Dirksen asked Mr. Charbonneau if the sight distance would be better at the, proposed Gaarde'Street.than the sight.distance at SW,110th Avenue.. intersection. Mr. Charbonneau said it was definitely better. Development Review Engineer McMillan confirmed that one can see to the west fora long distance, but the eastern sight distance is in question. She noted the SW 110th intersection would still be used so. the applicants have to either meet the requirements or "best meet" the requirements. Mayor Dirksen said in looking at Tigard Development Code Chapter •18.370, there are several instances where one of the standards/requirements is that it be a safe intersection. He asked t that while the proposed Gaarde Street driveway does not meet the 600-foot rule, is there anything about the access that would be inherently unsafe, other than a potential interference with traffic at the intersection with 110th? Other than the conflicting turning movements, Development Review Engineer McMillan said, "probably not." Mayor Dirksen asked if the access to Gaarde Street were limited to a right-turn exit only, would that be helpful? Development Review Engineer McMillan said this was reviewed; however, they could not make it meet the adjustment`and variance criteria. Again, she said it's the left-turn movement that is.the main concern. She said one can see the traffic coming from the west, so the left turn can be made safely and it is really the right turn that would be less safe, because of the limited sight distance. Councilor,Wood ruff acknowledged staff's concerns and application of the rules. He said it is the staff's responsibility to apply the rules; COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005 page 20 1 however, the Council's position is to change the rules, if they need to be changed and to interpret the rules if necessary. 1 Councilor Wilson noted that this is a Conditional Use process and asked whether construction was imminent on this driveway? Project Engineer Wilson said if permission was given, the. Church was prepared to*build the new driveway immediately. He said they are in the process of fund raising. toward .this project. Phase 1 would be the lower parking lot level.andwould include.the driveway for which they are seeking relocation. Associate Planner. Tracy added the construction of the parking lot is included in Phase 1,. the access opening to Gaarde does'not occur until Phase 2. However, Associate Planner Tracy said there was no set time limit between those phases. Project Engineer Wilson said the Church was assuming that as soon as they opened the new, relocated driveway, they would be asked to close the existing driveway. Councilor Sherwood asked if the Council was to make exceptions-to existing access on streets within the City within the Code, what would the timeline be, i.e. six months or a year? Associate Planner Tracy there would be. some time involved to draft language.arid analyzing what the impact would be citywide: He estimated at. least six months. for a Code amendment. City Attorney Ramis.advised. the Council that it is possible for it to adopt the interpretation offered by the applicant. He noted there were two( competinginterpretations: 1. Staff's interpretation, which gives the Council and the.' Hearings Officer essentially no discretion, or. 2. Applicant's proposed interpretation; which allows the Council discretion., City Attorney Ramis said that while the staff's interpretation is the most obvious, he would not say the applicant's interpretation-is impossible - it's also plausible. One outcome would be to interpret the Code as the applicant suggests and then to come back'in a legislative process and. take a harder look at this language to determine what the Council wants to do in the future, if the Council thinks the language"needs some adjustment. For example, he suggested the Council might want to consider treating redevelopment differently than new development and change the threshold that triggers the rules. COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26, 2005. page 21 In response to a question.from Councilor Sherwood, Attorney Smith referred to his Applicant's Memorandum, in Support. of Appeal. Attorney Smith read the following language (Page .15): "The Church proposes to the Council that the access and egress adjustment be approved subject to the condition that the driveway be gated and locked as specified in the Fire District letter." Attorney Smith said that the above language would be the actual condition that the City Council would adopt.. He then read language. on Page 14: "The City Council may interpret the ambiguous access and egress adjustment provisions of '20.C5 to conclude that access on Gaarde Street may be allowed even if alternative access on 110th Avenue is available, when that alterative access will. not result in safe access." i. Mayor Dirksen closed, the. hearing. j. Council Consideration: Councilor Wilson said' he is persuaded that the proposed entrance would be better than the 1 loth :entrance; however, he said he was also persuaded that the Code appears to be black and white on the issue. He said he would prefer to address this matter legislatively at some point in the future. He noted he had asked about the timeline on the construction of the driveway so that the issue could be addressed in a way that if.following the letter of the Code makes it more unsafe, that the Council would have discretion. Councilor'.. Wilson said he did "not'see it in'the letter of the Code as. it now exists," He advised he would. "go with staff on this one.". Mayor Dirksen asked the City-.Attorney if it would be permissible for the applicant to reapply for this access at some point in the future after the City Council has made a legislative change. Or, he asked, if once the application is in, is it locked in to comply with the Code as it now exists? City Attorney Ramis said there 'is no. time limit for reapplication-and the applicant,could reapply. 'Associate Planner Tracy noted that another option was that after.the approval has been granted, the applicant could return for a modification'of the Conditional Use. Councilor Wilson noted ,that he was going to be a proponent in the future for limiting access on Pacific Highway and he did not want to COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26, 2005 _ page 22 . set a precedent granting the request simply because there is no one opposed. He said there are many other streets in Tigard where it is very important to limit access for traffic flow. Councilor Wilson said that the strict application of the Code in this instance might create a condition that is more unsafe and more onerous to the neighbors along 110th; however, in this case there is a Church in a residential area as a'Conditional Use. Large churches'are really best located along arterials, where they don't impact neighborhoods. In this case, he said he thought it-would be a bad precedent to grant a .variance that the City's Code does not appear to allow. Councilor Sherwood asked if the Church applies fora variance after a Code amendment, will the .Church have to pay all the application fees again? Associate Planner Tracy said .that if the Code change would permit the driveway, the Church would need to apply for a ' Public Facility Improvement Permit, which would be about $150. In . addition, the Church would also have to apply for a modification of the Conditional Use permit. Councilor Sherwood noted she had difficulty with- this type of situation in that in order to make improvements for the City, a property owner has been.adversely affected. She said she feels there needs to be accommodation. However, at the same time, she agreed with Councilor Wilson in that the City has been working. for almost three years on access on major roads. She said she would much rather place a Code change on the fast track. She said she would go along with the provisions of the Code and hoped that the applicants would work with the City on a Code change. Councilor Woodruff said that he thought that whenever there is any ambiguity in the Code, it is important to come down on the side of common sense. He said in this case it seems that there is a special circumstance. He also noted he was concerned. about precedence. and if someone requested,a similar consideration in the future, the Council would need to look at how close it resembled this situation. Councilor Woodruff said he did think this was a special case. He said there is enough; ambiguity, including safety issues, so that he was persuaded that the City should allow this variance and allow the Church to continue.to have access to Gaarde, which the Church has had for several decades. Councilor Harding said she concurred. with Councilor Woodruff. She said she did not think a Code change would be necessary because she would not want someone to automatically be "grandfathered" and this might lead to an excuse to ask for a COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26, 2005 page 23 variance. She said she was riot one who would want to give variances very often. Councilor Harding said she has issues when the City does not follow the Code. She said that,. she* has seen Gaarde Street evolve over the,years. She said the City destroyed the Church's entrance when the street was widened.. Councilor Harding said the street was wider than anybody ever thought it would. be. She said the reason why this street was so wide.was, because it became an'MSTIP project after the bonfd measure in Tigard went down. She said she thought it would be appropriate to grant the variance with the caveat that the City monitors that entrance and, if it should become a problem, then the driveway, would have to be closed all of the time. Councilor Woodruff noted he appreciated the extensive amount of work done by the City staff and the Church. He noted there is a great deal of work that goes into development review and pointed out that there are more than,300 pages of material that relates to this issue: the Codes, the analyses and letters. He said this is' taken very seriously and he said he appreciates the civility on the part of the proponents. Although some might think this is, a small. issue, it is taken seriously when it comes. to application of the City Code. Mayor Dirksen said that in listening to.the arguments from both sides, his opinion has swayed back and forth. He noted that City Council has looked for a way to allow this request. He said he searched the variance codes. The only requirement in the Code ':that appears to be "in the way" for granting the variance is that' there is away to access the`property from another street. However, he said when looking at the plot plan, he thought it was arguable that because the two access driveways'on 110th Avenue are so close together, they really act as one driveway divided into two different lanes. Mayor Dirksen also noted the request was for a continuing use by the same body..He.said he is sympathetic to the idea of allowing the Church to continue to use-.something they have.'used previously. He noted he'shared Councilor Wilson's concerns with setting precedence as it relates to Pacific. Highway. Mayor Dirksen said he was compelled to agree with Councilor. Woodruff and Councilor Harding that in-this case a special circumstance does exist. He also noted the only other opportunity to use another access in conjunction with adjacent property would be to join with. Mr. Anderson's property.. He noted that this would also require an' impact on a natural drainage way between the two properties. He cited other issues in favor of 'a variance: 1: This is a special, COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26, 2005,- page 24 circumstance for lot size or shape, and 2. There is an existing' physical or.natural system in`a dramaticland form. For'the above reasons, Mayor Dirksen said he believes the applicant substantially meets the criteria.. . Mayor Dirksen'suggested language for a.motion: .That the Council amend the recommended amendment, which 'says, "Theexisting driveway at Gaarde will be removed prior to final inspection on Phase 1 and restricted emergency access from SW Gaarde Street to the lower parking lot area may be constructed as,required by Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, etc. ; and, he suggested .that"the change to "a restricted access from SW Gaarde,Street to the lower parking. lot be constructed" and with further language that it be restricted in use to the time as suggested by the applicant, which he . ; believed was from 5:00 Saturday evening to 6:00 Sunday evening. He added thatthis would be with the understanding, as Councilor Harding suggested, that as the City observes. the workings of this, and that this'use could be, retracted' later; the City would retain that right based on potential safety issues as a result. Councilor Harding, seconded, the motion,'as a.tentative.drafting of the wording with staff and City Attorney review so that-it is done appropriately., In response.to a question from CouncilorWilson, City,Attorney Ramis confirmed that rather than making, a tentative decision; tonight and voting that the staff bring 'a motion back to the City Council with'the supporting findings. Council discussed process.. Councilor 1`Noodruff.noted that with the people who are.attending.the hearing,, he would want to be able to let them know that the,.City Council decision would not change., What would be coming back to the. City Council is the formality of the wording. City, Attorney Ramis noted `that a vote by City. Council tonight would be a tentative decision'subject to its final review and approval of the language "that we bring you." Councilor. Harding noted she would be on vacation on August 9. It appeared from the. earlier Council discussion, it would be a "two two" vote,' unless someone changed their vote. ,Councilor Harding said, she would be available by telephone. Councilor Wilson and Councilor Sherwood both indicated they would change their. mind to support going forward with this, Interim City Manager.Prosser suggested the.wording of the motion. would be to tentatively approve the applicant's appeal of the COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26, 2005 ; " page 25 Hearings Officer decision and to direct staff to work with the applicant to return findings for final approval on August 9. Mayor Dirksen advised he would make,the motion as suggested above by Interim City Manager Prosser.. Councilor Harding seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present: Mayor Dirksen: 'Yes, Councilor Harding: Yes Councilor Sherwood: Yes Councilor Wilson: Yes Councilor Woodruff Yes Council meeting recessed': 9:14 p.m. Council meeting reconvened: 9:24 p.m. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDER A RESOLUTION FINALIZING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT. DISTRICT NO. 34 (SW 117T" AVENUE) a. Mayor Dirksen opened the public hearing. b.. City Engineer Duenas presented the staff report. , Highlights of the information reviewed with Council:are.contained in a PowerPoint presentation, which is on file in the City Recorder's office. ` C. Public Testimony:, None d. Staff Recommendation:. City Engineer Duenas staff recommended that the City. Council,approve,the proposed resolution to finalize Sewer Reimbursement District No. 34 as modified by the City . Engineer's report. e. City Engineer Duenas reported that no comments were received from residents within the area. All resident within this..area were notified of this hearing.' f.. Mayor Dirksen closed the public hearing. g. Council Consideration: Motion by Councilor Wilson, seconded by Councilor Sherwood, to adopt Resolution No. 05-50' COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26, 2005 page 26 RESOLUTION 05-50-A RESOLUTION FINALIZING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT,DISTRICT N07134 (SW 117T" AVENUE) AND AMENDING THE PRELIMINARY CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT CONTAINED IN. RESOLUTION NO. 05-17 The motion was approved by a unanimous.vote of Council present: Mayor Dirksen: Yes Councilor Harding: Yes . Councilor Sherwood: Yes Councilor Wilson: Yes Councilor Woodruff Yes 16. SECOND QUARTER COUNCIL GOAL UPDATE a. Interim City Manager Prosser presented the staff report* updating the progress on City Council goals. A written summary of the goal status is on file in the City Council meeting packet.. Interim City Manager. Prosser noted the following: Goal 1 - Revitalize the Downtown, with the subtask of completing and implementing..the Downtown Plan: The Downtown Task Force has continued to engage the community in discussions on this plan. The original plan was.to submit the Downtown Plan for City.Council . ' approval in July; however, this has been delayed until September to allow for additional input and work on the Plan., The full,. implementation of the plan will occur over the next 10-20 years. The second subtask for Goal 1 was for urban renewal implementation and developing a public outreach plan: The City hired-two consultants.- One consultant will assist with putting together the urban renewal plan; this is well underway. It is expected that the urban renewal plan will be presented to the City Council before September. A second consultant was hired to assist with the public outreach effort.- The consultant will help produce materials explaining the urban renewal plan and the goals of,the.City Council to update the downtown. Also, part of this process is to conduct a survey of . citizens to get their input and opinions on what is happening in the downtown area. This survey is being conducted now and results should be°available shortly. Interim City Manager Prosser noted that also under Goal 1, the 2005/06 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes approximately. ' $1.8 million for projects focused on the downtown. The CIP was COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005 page 27 approved by City Council on"July 1 and staff is now working on implementing. the plan. -Goal .2 - Improve'Highway 99W: 'Interim City Manager Prosser noted „ 'that a subtask was. to identify specific projects to alleviate congestion on 99W. He reported that.the -McDonald Street/Highway 99. Intersection' is being worked on and it should be completed in August. Another, project under Goal 2 includes the Hall Boulevard and 99W . . intersection. Interim City Manager.Prosser noted :this-is a long-term project. He said the City has met with the County to review.the preliminaryplans along with some cost estimates. The estimates were higher than expected; but'the City Council has indicated to the, County that this is still a high priority and encouraged the County to proceed with this project even with,.the'additional cost. The City will be working with the County to find the additional funding to make , improvements to that intersection. Interim City Manager Prosser noted that for the.Greenburg Road/Highway 99W study, the consultant will be selected in early August, with the study beginning in late August.. For the Highway 99W Corridor Improvement Study, Interim City Manager Prosser said.the.City has'submitted a.grant application to, the Oregon Department of Transportation for the-developrinent of a Highway Corridor Improvement and Management Plan., No word has ; yet'been received on grant award; however, preliminary indications have been favorable. Interim City Manager Prosser said that the Walnut Street Corridor Study willbe held in abeyance until.the`Downtown Plan has been finalized to determine whether or not there will be'a need to go ahead with this, project. , Goal .3 -Address Growth: Interim City Manager Prosser noted the subtask was.to revise the Comprehensive Plan for Tigard and, if . .funded, for Bull Mountain.:Council.added a'staff position to the City's budget'to begin work on the Comprehensive Plan Update. Staff is putting together the `recruitment materials for this position. In, addition, the. City. has had some preliminary discussions with the i County about including, the Bull Mountain area. The. County has indicated that'they are open.to this. The County has developed issue papers for the Bull Mountain area and these`papers, state the County would like Tigard to do the study for this area.. The City-needs to find out who will pay for the study in the area. Interim City Manager Prosser. said,that when the County staff is present at the August 16 COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26; 2005 page 28 City Council meeting, this is something that should be discussed-with the County staff. A subsection of Goal 3 is Metro - seek changes - the changes sought would be to free Tigard's Comprehensive Plan process to respond to citizens' concerns. Also the Council goal included initiating a discussion .with Metro regarding flexibility with density requirements. Council, adopted a resolution on May 10, which was transmitted to Metro. In',addition, some City Council members participated in a region-wide symposium on Metro and its land use program. No follow has been received from Metro. There will be another symposium, 'possibly in September. Mayor Dirksen noted that the time might come when it would be appropriate for the City to send Metro a follow-up letter advising that the City would like to enter into a dialogue with them to discuss the issues that were outlined in. the above-mentioned resolution. Councilor Wilson said it might also be good to refine the City's concerns. He said -it might take some staff time to assess where the City stands with regard to densities: Is the City is ahead or behind in Metro's projections? Councilor Wilson also noted it should be stated what flexibility the City might require with regard to densities. Interim City Manager Prosser said staff would schedule this for an upcoming City Council workshop, perhaps in'September.. Another subsection of Goal 3 is to Identify and Acquire Parks and Open Space. Again, by approval of the Budget, Interim City-Manager Prosser said there is money available for parks acquisition and development - approximately $2.1 million. Staff and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board are working on a recommended set of guidelines to help evaluate potential land acquisitions. The Public Works Department has received a number of suggestions for sites. In addition, recently the Public Works Director and Interim Finance Director.began talks about looking at some financing options to help make the money that is available go even further. A Review of Growth and Expenditures is a subsection of Goal 3. Interim City Manager Prosser noted this year's budget has been approved. The City Council has directed staff to prepare a resolution to establish a Financial Strategy Task Force and that Task Force has been formed. Its first meeting is scheduled for August 24. The Task Force is scheduled to report to the City Council no later than December 31, 2005. The final "subsection under Goal 3 is Graphic Identity (branding). Interim City Manager Prosser said a consultant has been selected to assist the City. The consultant has met with the City Council.three COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 26, 2005' page 29 times and City Council. has given input on designs. Additional workshop meetings between the Council and Consultant are scheduled. b: Council Discussion Councilor Woodruff noted is was good to'receive the update. He noted that "Downtown" and "Growth' appeared to be more easily addressed that Highway 99W. He asked City Engineer Duenas about the Corridor Improvement Study that the City.hoped to do.with ODOT. He asked if there would.be any impact with Bruce Warner leaving ODOT. Councilor Woodruff noted this was a project that would take a comprehensive look'at the whole 99W issue. City 'Engineer Duenas said he did not think that a change in the top management for ODOT would make a difference. The.ODOT staff is "driving this project.. City Engineer Duenas said staff expected the grant awards to be announced soon. City Engineer Duenas•said that enough dollars were-allocated in the CIP and this would.go forward regardless 'of whether the grant is awarded for this project. Mayor Dirksen',,noted while the goals were not specific, there are a lot „ . of specific tasks identified within the goals. He said staff has been given a lot to do this year and they have "hit the ground running and -have not stopped.". Mayor Dirksen said the goals do compliment one another. He noted the goal to improve 99W and the goal to regulate growth contains a task to, revisit the Comprehensive: Plan. One of the areas for review in the Comprehensive Plan is the zoning around . 99W and how this might alleviate congestion. He noted this is more of a long-term goal. Councilor Wilson said 'he was very pleased with the progress that has been made. He said he thought fewer goals were easier to manage; however, the goals were very ambitious and the City was dealing with some fairly intractable problems and given the difficulty, the progress that has been made has been significant. Councilor Sherwood noted she appreciated the hard work of City . staff. Councilor Harding thanked Interim .City Manager Prosser noting she has heard from several Department Heads that he reminds them often of the Council's goals. 7:. ' DISCUSSION OF THE TRANSPORTATION FINANCING STRATEGIES TASK FORCE (TFSTF) REPORT COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005 page 30 a. TFSTF Chair Buehner addressed the'City Council. In addition, Task Force members Ralph Hughes and Bev Froude were present.. Ms. Buehner gave a brief history about, the reactivation of•the TFSTF by the City Council to.explore'funding strategies to address the many transportation needs of the City that are not getting funded by. relatively flat gas tax revenues and general fund revenues. During the first six months of meetings,' the Task Force reviewed a• variety of funding options and, came back to the City Council in February with.a recommendation for' a gas tax'and how:this could be implemented. The City Council asked the Task Force to come 'up with abetter strategy and, to identify the types of projects. Since February,.the, idea of a grant came up with regard to the 99W. study. Now, the Task. Force has decided to wait until the study is done. Task Force, Chair Buehner noted that in.the last 60 days, some " . additional' items have come up. Atthe City Council's June 21 meeting with Washington County regarding the improvements to Hall Boulevard, the County,indicated that they were not interested in funding a right-turn lane on-the, south bound portion of Hall as it turns. west on Hwy. 99. She said there was.a comment from Council members and from people in the community that this was something, that needed to be looked at. There are also other issues -right of ` way may need to be purchased in connection_with the Downtown Plan. The TFSTF is looking for guidance from City Council as to whether it wants the Task Force to continue work looking at projects that will need to be'funded in' a shorter timeframe or whether the City Council wants the Task Force to "sit back and go on leave" until the Highway 99W Corridor, Management Study is completed.,-' b. Council Discussion ; Councilor Wilson noted that he•attended some of the Task Force meetings.. He referred to the findings of the proposed gas tax. Task Force Chair Buehner said that'theoretically a; 2-Jo 3-cenygallon tax would raise $8Q0,000 to $1,000,000 in revenue a year. She the Task Force. was suggesting. that this would. be set up in an MSTIP=plan model, -which..would be for five years with an automatic sunset clause unless it was reactivated. The plan would be,based upon a specific list of projects. The Council had. asked the Task Force to come up with a list of projects with a focus, on 99W. :Task Force Chair Buehner said the issue was thatwith the limited funding, the gas tax-would not represent a huge amount of money, but it might provide opportunities to do one or two projects a year (or every other year) that would not otherwise be funded. She said the Task Force had. planned to implement a public involvement program to inform the public about the proposal and to get input on projects. The Task Force did not. COUNCIL MINUTES- JULY 26, 2005 page 31 want to go ahead until they got a response from the City Council as to whether it wanted the Task Force to proceed. Councilor Wilson noted that the City Council .charged the Task Force with. looking. for funding sources. One idea was for a local gas tax. The Task Force studied this idea and looked into other cities that have implemented a gas tax to determine what the objections were. There was discussion about asking gas station owners about this plan; although, it is likely they would object to it. Councilor Wilson said that the decision was made that rather than "to raise a lot of hackles among people," since it is just an idea at this.point, the Council decided, to stay low key until it could be determined what some objections were in other cities where it had been fried. Councilor Wilson said the Task Force has wrapped up its work in doing this research - so now, it's an idea that is on the table. - He said that he felt that given that almost all .of the gas stations in Tigard are on Highway 99, that it would make sense to focus the improvements on Highway 99 where the money is generated. The advantage is that people who do not live in Tigard and use 99 would also help pay for its improvements. Councilor Wilson suggested it might be time to thank the Task Force for its work and give them a short vacation until the Highway 99 Study is started. At some point, when projects have been identified, then the Council might reconsider the gas tax idea. In response to a question from Mayor Dirksen about, hat the Task Force's feeling was with regard to going on hiatus, Task Force Chair Buehner advised that the general consensus was to go on hiatus until the Hall Boulevard project came up. - The Task Force wanted to come to City Council to get its opinion on whether this is something that needs to be addressed within a short timeframe. Councilor Sherwood noted she likes to tie revenue to projects She suggested putting things on hold until projects are identified on Highway 99. Councilor Woodruff-'noted his appreciation of the Task Force members. He noted the needs and the universal issue of where to - firi'd funding. He said it is a conundrum to find out what is a fairway to try to raise additional revenue that will create the least amount of controversy and conflict. Councilor Woodruff said he appreciated the Task Force's exploration of this-issue. He said he hoped Task Force members would continue to look at other cities to find,possible.means to generate additional revenue. He said he thought it makes sense to wait to find out what happens with the Corridor Study, if the desire is to connect funding with specific projects. COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 26, 2005,, page 32 Task Force Chair'Buehner said the:gas tax was really the only effective way to have those who use the road, but do,not, live in Tigard, help pick up a piece of the cost of the road. Mayor Dirksen said he appreciated the work of the Task Force. He said he was not inclined to,have the Task Force meet only for the sake of meeting. He said he would rather give the Task- Force some time off,. but would want the members to comeback when there are other tasks to be. done. Councilor Harding agreed that revenues should be tied to certain projects. She invited'others to share any ideas they might have... . 8. , CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE AUTHORIZING USE OF COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS BY ADDING NEW, PROVISIONS TO CHAPTERS 1. 16.030 AND 10.32.030 a.., Chief of Police Dickinson presented the staff report. Under TMC 1:16.030 there is specific reference to Code Enforcement Officer, but nothing for Community Service Officer. The'proposed change would not alter the job description of the Community Service Officer (CSO). A CSO is a non-sworn officer of the police department; these staff.members perform enforcement activities and tasks that free up police officers to perform, duties, requiring a higher level of law enforcement training, b. Council Consideration: Motion by Councilor Woodruff, seconded by Councilor Harding; to adopt Ordinance No: 05-08. ORDINANCE NO. 05708 -AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (TMC) TO SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZE THE USE OF-COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS BY ADDING NEWPROVISIONS TO TMC SECTIONS 1.16.030 AND 10.32.030 The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present: Mayor Dirksen: Yes Councilor Harding: Yes Councilor Sherwood:' Yes Councilor Wilson: Yes Councilor Woodruff Yes COUNCIL MINUTES -JULY 216,20,05: page 33 r 9. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS: None'. 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS: None 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Not held. 12. ADJOURNMENT: Motion by Councilor Wilson, seconded by Councilor Harding, to adjourn the meeting at 9:59 p:m. The motion'was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present: Mayor Dirksen: Yes Councilor Harding: Yes Councilor Sherwood: Yes Councilor Wilson:. Yes Councilor Woodruff Yes Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder Attest: Mayor, t . z5T Tigard Date. Cam(.. S 023 ~o l,Y~ J iaadm\cathytoant2005\050720 final draft in pmgress.dac , COUNCIL MINUTES = JULY 26, 2005 page 34 v ' QGreeter:. Gus Duenas FTITGIA D CITY COUNCIL I` MEETING 2005 6:30 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON RD CITY HALL SW HALL BLVD RD, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). . If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item.. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet.. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and 'should be scheduled for Council -meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639.-4171, ext., 2410 (voice)- or 503- 684-2772 (TDD -'Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA 7 JULY 26;2005 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING J U LY 26, 2005 6:30 PM • STUDY SESSION . > DISCUSSION OF-THE CITY'S 'USE OF LISTSERV ■ Administration Staff • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to consider employment of a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent under ORS 192.660(2)(a). All discussions are confidential and those- present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news, media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No 'Executive Session may be. held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council U Local Contract Review. Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council. Communications 8t Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 7:35 PM 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less, Please) ■ Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication Consent Agenda to be summarized by Youth Advisory, Council President Rob Williams: 7:40 PM 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items,are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve Council Minutes for June 21 and 28, 2005 COUNCIL. AGENDA - JULY 26, 2005 page 2 3.2 Adopt a Resolution Declaring the City's Intent to Participate in the City County Insurance Services Group Self-Insurance Program - RESOLUTION NO. 04-48 - A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY OF TIGARD'S INTENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CITY COUNTY INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP SELF-INSURANCE. PROGRAM 3.3 Adopt a Resolution Extending the City's Workers' Compensation Coverage to City Volunteers - RESOLUTION NO. 04-49 - A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE CITY OF TIGARD'S WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE TO VOLUNTEERS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD 3.4 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement for Membership in the Office of Consolidated Emergency Management (OCEM) in Washington County • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: - Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. City Attorney to review process for Agenda Item 4... 7:45 PM 4. CONTINUATION FROM JULY 12, 2005, OF PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI- JUDICIAL) - APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION ITEM ON APPEAL: On April 25`h, 2005 the Tigard Hearing's Officer held a public hearing to consider an application for conditional use approval to construct a 22,500 square ,foot expansion of the existing church and associated parking in three phases. As part of Phase 2, the applicant proposed to relocate the existing driveway on SW , Gaarde Street. The Hearing Officer adopted findings approving the Conditional Use Permit and Sensitive Lands Reviews and • denied the requested Adjustment to the access spacing standards. An appeal was filed on May 25, 2005 by the owner and applicant, on the basis that the Hearing's Officer misconstrued the applicable law. More specifically, the appellant's argue that the Hearing Officer's decision failed to balance the approval criteria. LOCATION: 11075 SW Gaarde Street; WCTM 2S 103DC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. COUNCIL AGENDA -JULY 26, 2005 page 3 REVIEW CRITERIA BEING APPEALED: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370 and 18.705. a. Continuation of Public Hearing (Hearing was opened at the July 12 meeting.) b. Declarations or Challenges Mayor or attorney to note the following: Do any members of Council wish to report any ex pane contact or information gained outside the hearing, including any site visits? Have all members familiarized themselves with the application? Are . there any challenges from the audience pertaining to the Council's jurisdiction to hear this matter or is there a challenge on the participation of any member of the Council? C. Staff Report: Community Development Staff Attorney's opening statement advised of this requirement... For all those wishing to testify, please be aware that failure to raise an issue accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the Council and parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals on this issue. Testimony and evidence must be directed toward the criteria described by staff or other criteria in the plan or land use regulation which you believe apply to the decision., d. Public Testimony Applicant Proponents Opponents Rebuttal e. Staff Recommendation .f. Council Discussion g. Close Public Hearing h. Council Consideration: Resolution 05-50 Councilor: I move for adoption of the proposed Resolution 05-50. Councilor: I second the motion. Mayor: Will the City Recorder please read the number and title of the' Resolution. City Recorder: (Reads as requested.) COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 26, 2005 - page 4 RESOLUTION 05-50 - A RESOLUTION AND FINAL ORDER APPROVING THE TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2004-000051SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2005-000051SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2005-00006 AND DENYING ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2005-00016, ADOPTING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS Mayor: Is there any discussion? Mayor (after discussion): All of those in favor of adopting Resolution No. 05- 50, please say "aye. " Mayor/Councilors: Mayor:' All of those opposed to adopting Resolution No. .05-50, please say "nay. " l Mayor/Councilors: Mayor: Resolution No. 05-50 (is adopted or fails) by a (unanimous, or however votes were split). vote. Tie votes =failure to pass 8:15 PM 5. PUBLIC- HEARING - CONSIDER A RESOLUTION FINALIZING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 34 (SW 117 TH AVENUE) a. Open Public Hearing . b. Summation by Engineering Staff C. Public Testimony d. Staff Recommendation e. Council Discussion f. Close Public Hearing g. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 05 - 51 Councilor: I move for adoption of the proposed Resolution 05-51. Councilor: I second the motion. Mayor: Will the City Recorder please read the number and title of the Resolution. City Recorder: (Reads as requested) COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 261'2005 page 5 RESOLUTION 05-51 - A RESOLUTION FINALIZING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 34 (SW 117TH AVENUE) AND AMENDING THE PRELIMINARY CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT CONTAINED IN RESOLUTION NO. 05-17 Mayor: Is there any discussion? Mayor (after discussion): All of those in favor of adopting Resolution No. 05- 51, please say "aye. " Mayor/Councilors: Mayor: All of those" opposed to adopting Resolution No. 05-51, please say "nay. " Mayor/Councilors: Mayor: Resolution No. 05-51 (is adopted or fails) by a. (unanimous, or however votes were split) vote. Tie votes =failure to pass 8:25 PM . 6. SECOND QUARTER COUNCIL GOAL UPDATE . a. Staff Report: Administration' Staff b. Council Discussion 8:55 PM 7. DISCUSSION OF THE TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIES TASK FORCE REPORT a. Staff Report: Engineering Staff b. Council Discussion - 9:1.5 PM 8. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE AUTHORIZING USE OF COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS BY ADDING NEW PROVISIONS TO CHAPTERS 1. 16.030 AND 1.0.32.030 a. Staff Report: Police Department Staff b. Council Discussion C. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 0,5 - 08 Councilor: 1 move for adoption of the proposed Ordinance No. 05-08. COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 26, 2005 page 6 Councilor: 1 second the motion. Mayor: Will the City Recorder please read the number and title of the Ordinance. City Recorder: (Reads as requested.) ORDINANCE NO. 05-08 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (TMC) TO SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZE THE USE OF COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS BY ADDING' NEW PROVISIONS TO TMC SECTIONS 1.16.030 AND 10.32.030 Mayor: Is there any discussion? Mayor (after discussion): Will the City Recorder please conduct a roll-call vote of Council. City Recorder: Conducts roll call, vote. Mayor: Ordinance No. 05-08 (is approved or fails) by a (unanimous or however votes were split) vote. Tie votes = fail 9:30 PM 9.- COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may. go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may, disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. WPM 12. ADJOURNMENT I:1admlcathytcc 120051050726).doe COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY, 26, 2005 page 7 ~QUI d, Oregon city of agar posting f1(~Zlt of CI'C'Y 0,F TIGARD OREGON. ' d 'rdiin ce[s1~ . ~5~ • Of the pr°p°Se In tie Matter t`] 0 " • J REGON . ss. STATE OF O~asbingtp11 " orn (or affirmed' by . county of 1 duly sw city of Tigard , being first Ose and sa ces, a copy of I, th (orirmation) , d P la at e ns.Picuous P •ted th oa Ong public and cO.. which were adOP , . ce[s) • std Ordinan the folio. r s~ of That I POsted in a copy[ ante Nurnber[s) ` hereof ; on:, Orden tirig. of ade a P council Mee • d d by ref~rence .m ci er 'to attac e r, I.- b*~' 20 . being h Oregon (Qday of . Blvd., ,gard, d' Oregon 125 SW H d H~B1v., Tigar d cit Hall y S al d 13500 Ti g, 1 g d public Libra' 2. gar ' W~ perf0 ed Posting person who Signature Of of .3 day this fore me . . b orn for affirrned) f . w bscribed ands 20 6-2p- 7/4 STS Oregon . S bw- ~G s N otary public £or Signature of • pFFtG1At-SEAS FREER A Q,AgTON . . y -ORE~oN PUBLIC NOTARY 373021) 2007 COMMISS%O 0cj oc ORDNANCE OF •DOC z:•' iy ccOMISSI(m ~AFFIDAVITS~AFFIDAVIT POSTING' ~~T1G333WSR~~EPTS~D~~GREER\FORMS City Of Tigard, Oregon'. Affidavit- of Posting CITY OF TIGARD OREGON In the Matter of the Proposed Ordinances 05-01 through 05-16 STATE OF OREGON ) ' D✓ , . k(V 05 - Os . County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) 1;. Ucc he-u n o a4/ , being first duly sworn (or affirmed), by oath (or affirmation), depose an . say: That I on December 15; 2005, I posted 'in the following public place, a copy of Ordinance Numbers 05-01 through 05-16 , which were adopted by the City. : 'Council. Tigard.-Permit Center, 131.25 SW Hall Blvd:, Tigard, Oregon. Signature of Person who Perfo d Posting S3 scribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me;this day "of 205. 01 OFFICIAL SEAL JILL M BYARS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Signature of Notary Public for Oregon COMMISSION NO. 381793 ' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 14,2W8 C\adm~omerlo-s%affidavhs\aflaiavit of posting - 05 ordinances,- 05.01 to 05-10 • pennii center.doc I , , CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON r' ORDINANCE N0.05-. OB AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL, CODE (TMC) TO SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZE THE USE OF COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS BY ADDING NEW PROVISIONS TO TMC SECTIONS 1.16.030 AND 10.32.030 WHEREAS, the City of Tigard has capable and qualified Community Service Officers trained in traffic and parking regulations and various uon-confiontational duties involving Municipal Code enforcement; and WHEREAS, the use of Community Service Officers for such tasks will free up police officers for duties. requiring a higher level of law enforcement training; and WHEREAS, the Municipal Code does not specifically authorize the use of Community Service Officers in many situations for which they are well qualified. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS.AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1:: The Tigard City Council hereby amends Tigard Municipal Code Section 1.16.030 by amending subsection (2) to read as follows with added language shown by an underline of the language: (2) "Code Enforcement Officer" 'means -the individual or individuals appointed or designated by the Director of Community Development or the City Manager to enforce the provisions' of this chapter. For enforcement of Chapters 10 16 thirough 10.32 and .7 .60 "code'enforcement officer" also includes community service officers of the police dpRarhnent SECTION 2;, The Tigard City Council hereby amends Tigard, Municipal Code Section 10.32.030.by adding the following subsection with added language, shown by an underline of the language: (d1 Officers of the police department may issue citations for violations of Chanters 10.16 through 10.32 and Chanter 7.60. For the purposes of this section. `.`officers" includes police officers reserve officers non sworn officers and community service officers. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder., ORDINANCE No. 05- 'D V Page 1 ber- ead by num t rs vres!x, ai i S note of, all Colo cil me 2005. of ' BY U ~ only A,;s "dam dal PASSEp,dtitle ~za . _ eaxley> C1tY g . cierine 206. IdA s s~- day of ' Tlgaid city Co~ail ovEp: BY ~P_ ~,,I&YOT f ved as to ibatomei ate Date 7260 . ardinance•doc V. , • . \adcnlPac"e~05~050 1. . Page 2 ; AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING July 26, 2005 - 6:30 p.m.: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to consider employment of a, public officer, and current/pending ' litigation under ORS 192.660(2) (a) (h). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are, allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4),' but . must not disclose . any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. • STUDY SESSION " > DISCUSSION OF THE CITY'S USE OF LISTSERV • Administration Staff > ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS • Review of Pilot Neighborhood Program Map • Procedural Review by City Attorney for the Quasi-Judicial Hearing (Agenda Item No. 4) • University of Oregon/League of Oregon Cities survey of advisory committees. Information to be distributed to the City Council • Strategic Planning Retreat is tentatively scheduled for September 30, 2005. Set time and r location? • Council Calendar: o August 9 Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Town Hall . o August 16 Council Workshop' Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Town Hall o . August 23 Council: Business Meeting - 6:30 0.m. - Town Hall o August 30 5' Tuesday Council Meeting - 7-9 p.m. - Tigard Water Auditorium 1 Executive Session - The Public Meetings Law authorizes governing bodies to meet in executive session in certain limited situations (ORS 192.660). An "executive session" is defined as . "any meeting or part of a meeting of a governing body, which is closed to certain persons for deliberation on certain matters." Permissible Purposes for Executive Sessions: 192.660 (2) (a) - Employment of public officers, employees and agents, if the body has satisfied certain prerequisites. 192.660 (2) (b) - Discipline of public officers and employees (unless affected person requests to have an open hearing). 192.660. (2) (c) - To consider matters pertaining to medical staff of a public hospital. 192.660 (2) (d) - Labor negotiations. (News media can be excluded in'this instance.,) 192.660 (2) (e) - Real property transaction negotiations. 192.660 (2) (f) - Exempt public records - to consider records that are "exempt by law from public inspection." These records are specifically identified in the Oregon Revised Statutes. 192-6.60 (2) (g) - Trade negotiations - involving matters of trade or commerce in which the governing body is competing with other governing bodies. 192.660(2) (h) - Legal counsel - for consultation with counsel concerning legal rights. and. duties regarding current litigation or litigation likely to be flied.. 192.660.(2) (1) - To review and evaluate, pursuant to standards, criteria, and policy directives adopted by the governing body, the employment- related performance -of the chief executive officer, a public officer, employee or staff member unless the affected person requests an . open hearing. The standards, criteria and policy directives to be used _in evaluating chief executive officers shall be adopted by the governing body in meetings open to the public in which there has been an opportunity for public comment. 192.660 (2) (1).- Public investments -.to carry on negotiations under ORS Chapter 293 with private persons or businesses regarding proposed acquisition, exchange or liquidation of public investments. 192.660. (2) (k)- Relates to health professional regulatory board. 192.660 (2)(l)- Relates to State Landscape Architect Board. 192.660 (2) (m)- Relates to the review and approval of programs relating to security. iAodmtcathyMAUnciltpink sheet - study session agendast20051050614.doc Stud Agenda Item No. 6cn Meeting of Z7Ct I U c;Z tD , x005' CITY OF TIGARD TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Gary Ehrenfeld, Information Technology Dir for OREGON DATE: July 11, 2005 SUBJECT: Listserv We have researched the request from a Fifth Tuesday- meeting to find a method to e-mail notifications and information to the citizens of Tigard. Our research found that using a method called Lisfserv would be the best option for the City to use to accomplish this task. Listserv hosting is a mailing list program for communicating with other people who have subscribed to the same list. Using e-mail, you can participate in Listserv pertaining to your topics of interest. There are several options on how to accomplish this and these options will be presented at the July 26th study session, along with the pros and cons and costs of the options. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 TIN 17 -17777=-7 C ,",,:.•t3".,fit .F-~t~~^"akri''-e3e•;.j .hx~.; ,~xx , ca"~.~`i'.'q~' .^y, i`c...: , 5~,. ,.>A•~ ei•~' ,4. ".~..a" ~'SyE: }i' :in, ;''ta t'aa.1•f Y " Ci. `pp "T'i w?•'v, S w; sta. ':4^"°s • a:'a Ee"G~ta ~P".f'r': &YAM ~:a''k•ild`• 'C.` ..,3... ',,4,. : ta't, el~ « [ n wt n„~ r•i w "i, ;:~~~r'~;`~.3a~yx' L 4 `cry, . ~,a:r :~,"x ',<z,••`. -:k;a.",., .~'.1• ~.:t `a"` ad,,, ~.'a,.^,',i`wd"arnr+ ai ,a`' «'~,Jf„-,;,,,^,;fy °k,E; „•xi^, tt'~"•:~t;3 "•t, •ht " ,g. '41t~:^ fit ,.ya _ .,t.t`.~,:+'el" d',. ';'✓'RC`rv °.'ti`r~a, t' •3. "^~E"•fi 't~'~. L?. ` ° dap :"t'~`!`^'^. .3., +T 'i<~•,~',, lg,:. "a~,' 3~"• ,fie ^'k f i`r . , ~ ~R`3.'i 1' ~ "7, r ~i s p,".a'!,, 1. _ , _ ` y, `d r .i'~~ .mot'" "~t,;et• 3,~•' "Y W ..y h' ~0. ...'.°aa.t.4,'. „C..„a.d-• s e.l •r~., , All ;,.+k IRS z.°s`:xr.~. „.Z 't~... TWA 0 1. .9 _ - .,Fr,... ( Xti 4~• 'tM. t• .y. :'A i .apt x m. w 5r'y r', rP y wwanny lag r <R'%t~`^• '~L:•~ &MA'.«aM '~';rF ".~~'«L~., . `..d:~'' ~•y`1:'r k '"~'~5"C~:•~'o'.•%a~~ ro. i{•' $"ary irol~ 3. .'7`:."~Sr':S'st: s:'r;.'F , ~~~".l~'~::'~ NA •°"•C~ x., S '`'ea ,.Q." ,h ~ ~ -dt•~ "[UT. ~d"r^w rkm' ~4~~:,i.-~ tro ~t\.r . a, a,-:.,~.' _ •,"4,,s,,,~ „t'~°.~+~` };'`sc'a;; xy,, , ct';t,i~r"x;.:,.,.. Y*::,'~'i" at^L ~•fai3. yA• y., SS ..3e., Ax,„ <a"''£n° ,^"'"""n:$+, a<':..`. ,A'p'.,~G~ :~''°,k„.sq'b'' .,v.'S :r'.'~' .,ati„3i~+S,.,,r~'~,~"SC .~`P•r `.`-ti, ~p:Ca•,. ..t - r :a^' • ' S: , S t~ . v,~ 'mi'x <~r•:,. lion. x 00 %"~c: * . > ,¢!•rg~w "r.• w, a 'e i 4 „'z~°:~:.,, ~ at r Y. .•t'A''B'CY. +d ~,5 ,:}~y~ ."U '.i ~ •x ~ fl. "K "~R%'9i'tlas i`'~{": i'a''n'. ,.1S:h .«Y\3, ~;~rn" `3"1`~:Y` '~d' .""F",Y.~.e.~ `•l''' d*v ,~"~4~r. Ly'-.}.a. C,~~: ..fv a, ' N+', .sA ~"iak, ~i~'~: t'r" i'V>cµ £•M'4 '~i .^i•' g''•.t'+`'n`",•, :,.~~'.:r ..r.~, ,3'~.'7:•".~ •t,c..~°. ,.{..1°•~~;.< :f4 .•t r,A aM. °'•i".. °1x"«iv3.: .p;P• } ro•}n r, Y,#' ';y4.s W °:'uC,. : ,r,EV,; ?.w, ..°Yt t,5, {,4s'}, ^ 4.ia; r,' •'ti 'r •,~ny[s, a~;. ^.fi`;. ¢ary «s "t ^"4':~:i?~'~. ~~d .'n6~ .~••;•~e f,:°."S x';--alp, a id.«,d1, my e>.t ~.~4!. .1. ,y.'1v3+-'i~l.,~a g' .y "'~.A j~, g,.. '%:'.L'.;} ,4+k .e1 .Irt. P.•..4.*te : ~'~:N k`.. •.1_ ` 7;a . 5 • ' ~1£'r , rz.o"' , a., at,,~ ri;!.L:' "~?'S: " r ;rP;~•°'.,~~": i ' -.Mi, . z , t"v~";. ti q~p f"s, `+"S, 7{ P "t,r. Ag'• ,-ui:'; .,"av^y+°• , 'X' 'tiWl, ^S .F.=•",`x.x"e MRI. s 4" AR 5 i'%.": w. •asn- •,'~i d: :'t';,, aY3?ehrUJ 1«e,,, ;;td: isf, r .va~`'•' rr).` ' • 4.~'-' PQ I •:.1": yr' tt:L"S' yykk''' Q.x,.'.: sz':. :,6. ' y 'ae•~2 •4. V 1. {1, t ..4 "'.,N° .k,• .t - F•3', y,' ( ''t, .,n.7::i men ;Lt•T et r9y -R "•2#."'.• '•R~' r h: _ .:,3: '4.1r":t"•*$ X•.: .'?t ''ra. - .Y `y: .a ;'y,.; ~i`° 'E~;«k:,`", r,<i ~~i'•,rYe'~:".,q,. .5.,_r 'u.y, •.=~'`,r-:. ~Tx. - i91n :a f"5i` .'..yy*t%i >•r " d ,r'r i.~:: _,.'i %'r~IPC„ ~ ~ ti*~:'"';. r ,,.d, 'i. va.AE.~'xvi` -'`aq ~'r L w`^r'S~r.ra ,a : ~,s, . ~-I::._,•:;. ,d! ,R:r, r ,?;t, ,•,n••F'1 't=,": n'I•,; ~Rx\ ' . : ~,r,a e t, ' a.r,. ,t.t . - ..s!»_d.` "-;f.'i. t=X ',Yr. , t~'~"~,':4L1:'',°' :,d - r _..c •z•b "•.i - _ _ a .a„t. ,"~';a: ` ;:7i';a°;aaa5 „jk. •,.sd.;uy apt +~,-i.`~ hw.'~r_.'t{.. _ ,y i* ` ~ .:p`4,' •,r • {t _ "i ~ Div - ^.i'- .'r~ `t', •~{~v s1"Y 1'~°a~ ti[! .20 '3ts'~:' ,~e,t .n". ',i.'i',.!•}'»sa'.•..,'a};-x? -Ya$;is1•,°°. 'S- Zxt .~b• •o. :cc; e V •w ~.z'a '~;d°j a ni. f~ :MOO, 'a'n't~.'.•=r ;.rfS:;> f~t..w ' 'o-::--. ;tr,;'C':'f w' .,.•ft~•,,a 2. ;.j, .-!:,R.•a}.v.' `,1.4`*'._ `'4t`>n, i ~4'- «.k. 1.. "k•s.rs1 a•S` t 2».ri. Aga p~,',_•i.,~,ata_a .n»„A ~.o`:; 4;e~' ,.y" +,r. r';•n h~,e ,~ra'~ 'y ~~tJxr,,:;: t.;w°"ya,{'-. °i~'~;k ~n ni •r~'".~;q~~~'exyt}~',.•+r .b _ . ! yy•s Y' :p: \'=jn> .",o yy~•• ."S'''iy .e` )t ,,°~4', } y1` t 'Pi' .;y"~~!e~ `S.' ~1~•.li'; ~ i<p `'}',,••t"a',. ,P...aa+ C~~j >P ,•~G ;d: F-F. E ~~•a , 2~ low m a - - r J ` -'d- :a ~`R e.;; , rn ,'k :,.h-< t'"'p. y t~l`%'t£ !st;,...'• ;N n a~? - a :r•+' F4 xGVa,.~' ';»'•r"S,~'•'z ..•`~7..''{-" 'Y''t''`.;i.4-`:ih, „x h.•dD, .i, r,f ~s 3~~,"'r E.: .v k' al^I.c`,+' x..<r„g i~..',t: •t~ - T.e.+. • n+, 1, # ;:y wF ^ t^a114li - .a~}' Fr ~ygy t.ta 9 s.{ ``r ~•,'w"y~?. <;,E ; r ti, ed.tn"-,~, a:`✓,. y`» w ~Y r 4" 4 .,wE ; gir+ ,g ' C c~a war«"* ..i .'t ryµ •-'t.~^ 'H;: , ` - A#. , 5f` i, ',"fit •J.'( qa m .u • ° `a ; • ty[n, , •b , 3 d+ ar;r . 1 •r: a,;"{{.,r~:j•V"j';;, ? 3 ','n+0'':Mine C 771 j S•. r 3:. ~ .ga^n.'r,tie-''`y+~,•t.~' ,",~a`,a` ~w .h. ~ •-,ita~ c~`,. XS,~``, >4. r E• P ~"1' - Oft x&i ~ z.Y•'",^. $ !l` "t:~,":~."n c. a ",~{'tYrc'- ~~J s~~",a, ."„a et' ~,~.•F w~a~~'~~'t ,6~2't~s+,r.~t^`~.~4,''; '^fKu'+.t~"' ~v sS~" apt ,6 a~ _.a~~~~~-`~ d: ~.a• ~ ' ' i t *~'r 'le r. ~,~t Rr Gq } v, S,. try°. F ''1_ '~SeppFa lys7{ ^4 +wt + x ~ T,.t a~~x"44^a°'~ ~ wav-•+~€- _ --F k ~ P ' - ~v,F'"ta' r t "y'2:f;rXXP'+s tr[/?.; ; f r _ , ~ :~:s''t •t y~~ b ~rn~t ' ~ ~ A y 1~ f~ : -rn . -v~ ~ ~ ~ afw~c r ~ €~~o-~ "~I=-•ua,' r~! w r,~r a ts•`', ~z,`;tra"'o'''+''eyf'.'"1+• •_-b, aii/,' HO ii/ ?ts Vi' .K .:i s' 4i~«1i, O fin' .t' ;h • 1+rv'yI '.mar/.%;~'vyt T'R ."i. f ~ Ig§'~~"c,• .,'~4•r•4, '}:a~'~:~i^e s g'^z •''a ,~~r~t_`(~~ ,}~1. ~ - ~"r+~Lu:i 'itttl,~lv`.~w: twv?n wn y-4•~~i~-vS~,~,ti~?~; ~'y M.~.., ~$"3~,~''~;~e„~" v~r"twa - tf ,.lily ~ •h,:{"«{,.,}r~pY^~''` fat: ~~r,'~."'~ar"ai ..'"P'„Eda 1 ,~i,.•i ,'h`p~,^4 ~'„put,'+. + ~y~~ ,F~ ~ - ,tF ` I ^ s.,-' ' ~ s' • ' ~ ` ~ A < ~ s ~,~Yb~~ e~h x dG tl . 's . ~V r~K~' „ ~ ~ tri i 0 .t ' i.y•xz~'za.i' ro kia.t, rS;{ R b~ a C- &$aW'# r. .};xASv`'•.;it•c~'^o.,,;kT~ y2y rG tort ,a -aa~. 1-•-'e+,.-~ • ,,,o,~, r ~•'°5 r'r ~ ,L~h~•'^ • =y,, ..'P♦"""•.:~ , vkr :gTA`. ~ F7. ¢mti t•''ti r •g'Gt s.P ! '1zS.• ''w'v`.,°:`.+.+~ - .4-My,n a, ' er~+i~ ..•0 ,,fSi...•'•°•I'• 'C +3;, ~•{t• 5,2..;a::« Z,t q t ;~3' ,e'};f"`-. ''`''.%"'5+; ,<~%i,,' ,;/!°~v:° (/,,~~)r`,, ~.,»,r,. -vaq'r - !i ,~a'•~;b9+:777~..- - d• "\,y~'PR Yz+Mtil, k,,~`v fy rtY~ '$i ,t 1. ".R'A d•. W 8" a5•L<'~~v: cw.`7 ~'3 `~~°~r.^n., r. ,~b. b+. ;;.St}a.t w+t~µ,; ~ .,h "s,,.. ; ~ ~j..a r,,fa cl•:;, 1' :n , tw'•"{axr~.'~x';~,^ ;VO.~7~« ' }~ii; •i"• ! <q ~ ` - r is;_ :~~;r, Y,°~:~,t~rr is•'a~:~:.. ,,~~;~c, '~~;~~Y.~•«._`.,.°:7 :r..: 'tF'~I",`.,'t d`"~+;;~, y...'~.;,,~°, - .'s..~x:ta,~~ 4' .}..ffi .eta ~a~r+~~ :~'_.t• m,i.l',~,,,pr~+,, 'a "~,~a~<~'c a' ~°::+.~a;a' ,-w,s~t,w~ c;• L'~,. ~,~~<ti {,y.,!°si,+.v, x n~"p~tl"n:,v;> ..,A..a.,, k• y~, k:,, r '.6:»,:, i. s•T0. ;fie r~t j,'I~•., rv>...~'®. n »'i: tu•::'+?~a~~~~i{ ~'f,..°..:. ~Ef~+;?"'~:~~}_ .,•+;rj _ •t .,s~. .;*y,°: ill F.~„ +i t-A";.''3iJ•°''~:" '{r" ~`.:Y "9"M ~.ii/+ %~{z Nx.:g ~a r<* !,'..C >p . n'w .:1 . . t":i"` ,.,a + 4~ji,`~ .+?b -s , i+.p r.•. ` •ft• - s >a? `yi: ' -4 •',t.t•$3 ,."{"u~~ r. t., ,aw,.'~`::: •"I=«' ":"i~*. 'i:~S. ~at"p s .i',-;,dt' ' 3«. _,:.r _ ,.•A.e., -"ara - ~;i,a 4: P,. a , ;P ;i+~'s .'&,t ~t; ,..i.:»."•:a ,kS''.'.', - t , L : fib".. P. dY, h" ,,,..:I6" ..u :at, 'Ls, tdE'4 i. C•'q O ,l~l a•+,Y6 a,'t. •t•`` 1 ta'.;.i l T:• gar'.." y t., •'.v~'. 't`'S."; rq"~t•fr.,ir»~t" 4'J:~~.".r ,~-ta,`tn,:+i ,acd,k~'~~q ` +fP. ~t,v,~"':°',. ~+a- ..v.. _ a,t•~ p `w a'P;,• a:;:, ~.4 'a• .3 ``''*,'.:;C'r. .L. :r„y ..p.:,.;x~9n: .t~~~." e .al 'Ar'.~i 3r~„.i A.s'A'.c' :Sb2v ,a9rn, .4 + i 'w"' ++s,' r.P~~• a :.p"•'4 ;;i. a. ; '':•o' asf• ^t;''~'~'kp''g.'' ..z~y."'$a i>Y 'v:.'~"4`Cz.,~.: ; `q.'~ cr. :1 . hr ,,f N ltya at, I" ir, r';.;.~^tid- 'a .SC. ice.:. - '.-'t°`•. .3. R a.. s.C` .°F+.. ;i >.*.J ~'b. :v •r'. ~3.° ~i d^r. ~4,: «%t'Y•t` ;~t„'. Sf"'•;;,~,.: - ~'4;. ?^y .c. u.:,tt., 7`" ~ ~ <y,.„r'~a~.r `r' 1 t t 1,.-4x.}}••' .•1•~•~f. .r A~`{, h'• 't•'•'A`1 al 't i-~`iil v'1 ,(p 1,~'~a~A' .r r: .y^ .^v"^~ F..i. rr saJi+~~' .L:-'i ;:5,.'• ,'n•'~"d~ :c. 11 ~e:t': ,a':"'4I-` tidi.,S. ^,r.' 9. °•~S`":•~~ ''4;4iw .~tl.: „f'.T. ~;7:M i. +~kt': t%M at- .P. x, s:; a•.~" r.3~-v~'af ,r, 7' :'L5{~ ~;d',: - r+ '~v. .3. «,.,r' ' ? S,R r.x.-.:;, -.e .r,~'O, ?~tl•;sw. .+tx~.~, .wi"a.+z.~„i.•, >?•i., r.t'r , ~.'.yx.Y ••V:,', - '"I: ctia"~,• ;a.~ •,i."!+srx: "k'4~i'; ,,tw«.at~^,✓~',.i.+~?.ti;."~i••N'~`. `;5A ,n.' .l.« s•'3.-`„n"a~.a..~..•».'";!& t-ei's,a^a'~pp 6„ .P t T '~y;'` _ ,~nn'. '`i•~•e, r. .C;gi•'..+:t..'y. J,..,..~^";.zRhe..v ^e,~• C. ""a~°^'4 i', fi`n', ip„ ''."W i{''•a•+•d W,z+i'°w ;,/,~!1!~~:r=°°;...,. {•t ;?y,a~+e°~?~',7: xf-°•' ~,"`s H,:i~--.. ,"kp „a'.r... 'g ° ,.a.,,c ~rv a - w{„ I;,~..S: ff?.,. T,~~.Sky . •R'C„x•,,.t. ~•:°=5.. ~ 9.: , a",nl+~. "e't".. ,•`t~,'$Ft+' t~,, e.a•-a.:L+` .a~$a, p~ .;,~.1%"'„.^°~- °~~X~, ~';i "~T. +Pa,t`,w v:71SS'6 .L ,,,nrr,6a:'r'"~,.3+£,e.i ".`•,,i~.~: 'k.ta_, . h.,;L.'~.,,~`r✓;~K - ~:',~r.~•; :c.t„~a"„k "r-R v ac~ ..,a„'tm ,1°°,aS+~.M,3:a :r..v,:.:,'a;',..r•, e~. `!'~'+.V Y 'a., .fir„ -«3, '~:'r ..y 1• k,.,;?,,• F..~.r~`~_.^~.-`,. Z," :rr„ t ~ ,r. , ;x,~, .:tK"~.i~, . ;.,::mow` •'f:. 'r°'i:, ti V7 l ~,y ~y S• i'^s'*t t' -'~kk1':w't° ,~R.q; 3,~t 1. r;~-;v ;t•v. aht F-",FqA s 2 .w4a tt ' i ` ; . G~•,.,'~ `,s.. sir . `F a. • I"k > ;<'¢r . +sl.^xa«°` ~ "~a,F'•\+ < I~F .,~tt Xvx`~=.i : : x:+.rm.. ~'"t . >0. .,pb, ..'z."~ .,S Ems. :!'i'«,hbi ~,•Ri't~;.' •1, rY.ri,,`~:s'~jiPkk ~'Y rA^+ +:>4a 'e F'j'3:Rn,:.r .3„~,.-,nkt~N fF•q'. n .3 :,",5.. ^xe ~ : ? , f,:•" " •t:° .'M~:tI'i',' fi,YF„w :'.`T ( - «'ld..° .'tl1Fn, .1 °,°+.,x', r - 7°, i,~" +42+n"•ad;.~..;v , "Y ~a " NS' "°pm.., r~~.lk:, t+'. "ti C, 4x~, , hu i.~i of +3, . Y'.: .IP'" [~gtR ~~P:. ;t-£',n":p, W '•.4":'.5:1.7.::x.+:~~~ •:i3,_ 3n:° ,I,3`e. w' , IA, "M "~in'•.,< :+`S~~NS r= ,adv^R~t~~";tA~ ~'v~;r,",:;'s'.'a':.~.: i}". ;:'}`*,i~ii p~: „3 :3:';f:' ~`!'•'..+~.a~r ~'a v, :}y., +°r.t.' a•. .fit' °,:d ,ass; ~;,r,,~_. t:.' ,j;~~.,' '~,,~s°;.,. .x .'.'1. ..;f,_t '~,.r! '~~w"r' .'~,~'r~e:~..• r: a'.a .a~ I Ti: 'y,t. 'i•rfr:,~a.t'4' .~1€. E'-'!`' -j;;k».. ~~~V'~ `r,'r~` .G, :"ti ~:Y,' ,;~"~rkr-, :..3.o-"~ `"'sue^~c~:~'' r.'k~ ~w^",, I ,.yyl!>' "'Sr.. :Za,-:.a' Ma „5L«`,.. .:'zYN, r.•,la...."~ ,A , `•dd: ,~',5.;?/~N~ii.C.;" •.:4•' a~, E. .S" ",y':Y' -'l rs rte,, . - )u ~v: -'wx,i'n':r .:.jra ! ~,y.~:!'i kR,?;,{,:. ia:.~'7$~,.1• ..e}:,i:.,. \ ri' e Y,MS+"" e,,,~': y"•, iix.$;.~' ,...e .,..r a. ~":a:r, f. y.. - C>~-3,re •:~u ^,Ag.^ ;~„;~.ei. :'~i3 a.- i:n~'<'`r' •Tt,~'... .•~t, -'¢'w~~ . :die _ .t'''::'`-.' '"5 :,8 ~r rv,:„ •k'',Atta -~g,,•'y ~ , 1.4 N3k1', s "V J 1 -y. ;J. ~5> iA".n~d•yN' •t` .'~~~'1~.~~'N' fir: M,;:{~;,.":.,•;€;''t:F -I," - s~:fs p;: ..'~.Y., tit~~.'<" `G•±~. .:,~t..x y~?\C"+=' ~ rw§~t.. w°q:.:gq,~"8.,! .,~S+F'.'=2... •6t '"i• , t 't.. ,'.t+. - ~~•t . ' a.... °`k} ' ` ••.'7! . t.,..,•,w+1=t~.p~ .p•p• jW:: 4: ~4 i - '1` - _ - ;,0.x..'9.,,. «7'." ~r;.q "•t~,,: ""c.,r ~';,;."L,: -•@ C '-4 A°'.i31fJ, ^ si ."i.v`. , b " 1.+ R • Tf.': _~'h+ - :.r s +y, r.,fl32ai. ~;9'-'.°~.'. .x `u,~ «:,'..J.: .i.. .•~.•c~.w-~. ,JYt:• , _ F ,1. - •Y''a'St-. ^3~r"i ..hi:d~'•:..:•,c: rvet ar'74: '4 vA'nM•V A.n `°M•.,. '-•A. ww'. y t4~ "a,r °''n• „O,. ~a eF ~ra,., ..a_ a.',:y. 5~.}t:?1'i~~t';ye ,t-,, ,t .a~"'ahtel;~,"„`~;,ti';';^ A w ~T,~ X"~°'~ .ri", t t r,y ~r`yY, h ~`;n•,.t..r,Pr' ~`i'~ e ..ark`r."'4,•,"-1,g. ctl, ;,e!~v~~^ G'4 j ~O•? :1. ..3.;. it a:..• ,c:•. 5,:•, ,.s ~r p~Ai 44 a'd+~. `P y.,~.:i'"~'.,i a. L.~a ?~fi,'hea 3o-3 t" ^a ~iwt•.w< ,'l~ a.-p.. e.'t`r .r~a. v~'.S~;,s;'t,~ V,"•<,~~°„k~",; v, r*~^ ..~y',~;?~,.`. .~F,~±G.,r K:; __°i;i"'x.A' /~•~'t~`~,°r•,~Y;!4/~:1,:7."~.'3a..+,. y.. i`r'`~~,,, k~t~+: .k,^'d-•. ~:+"4~art ~,-s`3°. ,f~',.,t'~;.. ,ty„ .;.a"', ;~.~:+t., .G'~.a~.:, <;S\_.ta ^.,'Y~~~. -~a;~•;•,~,~r ',~.".':i.t..~ .„:~titiJ! ..s•. ~;w4,a,~? fii.,,.. :w; < Pa:. :...'~"='`t;• ti•.,,,~,.;aFa^.,, ' r 5'- .kr~°t`$.~Alj,'^••. + •',"-}q'`•~.0-,. 'tt •i<:. ;'4 _ `J EL3 ~J '~"~z~s.i.~ sb.-~d!+';~•.':~~•~'~ Y, y,: rht~};. r "1"#...?< 7:.,~_ L'- Tai 'l~l 3~,, l"+.. 1, .Y•"'.•.i'~ 0' Y' ..r . S..r .:•i: `=ti: er~"'1...:•+, v:' ^vs.% - ,7~: . ~ .w • ,r"!E°4:l .:U,. ~>e, r••.'~' '!r • :1'3: •.K °.'4., z%x'" •*Y` ` ~Y Cl 1.4 w.~.r „ry`•t:^ - art; '~»`T.i 5 r,'..t e:' •1 , N`'. . I`:': •:;~:.~~rv.a,,~ i.'•'b2 <..ry',ai't nr.F.l~t.~.fi~~:, 9[ yy<~_~Y"F?~3"e`:' "C..~k" •;t <,tY•» ~ n a, x~ , • , r~'°~'tit" j~'a .,r.„ a..a r,:ti x t.•F4"~'•d:~"•'~^`1, r t'~'-ti=e° ..',F,!`.R3 ~a m',~•.. ri ~S pp~~ aa, g{' a, • 4'.~ AV .r~'~ ,.,~•ta^_ Ceh ~*...1~~" T'iDro. k_.~H`~~~i, ..Yr~,~,^ %.~/~1~'fi. .'Ub • eY k`~r. L~r, t.~~,~h}. f i i :pr t.`~r•} ;a' ' "i to ~ 'i. t. to.VJrS'*A+:~~~~+,~4Tr~.t~1}"Y"•': ~h, c;• f'a4';,4 `x "a.tr t n,,•//yy~f' . i`:`!y'.r •~''V. ' S , { y_•}~,. .O,a `Y. , e; a .-ti1J 4 - - C„k ,q «s ".s• r"''C'`' „ `1 .p _ l .R:~"`r, •.,j i,a°'dt t~=.. tea'.''a'•rr::/J'-{:`J•~`5ts.'u`. N;&~„"°""~i~,°~".-,rr•.,%3• .i Lr ~'„at• .~5.;'`ta: R''•''` '•e, ° ","!„i~S,-r. u,.,r5.s- ~ s.. °'x :r;~.,,th."4r,`r, ~wM°i ~q ,k*.. _ •J'y,. .i '•t. ~.Y,, iY.M ~',O•. ;i°< Y'~~. ~..0~,.. •'i.~} e~7a?-atY,•1 ~'C, kr~'?b S,•S CSft°: a:_- 3j d ~ ' ` v'ti" a? e" + r?:."-~r. ~.;.F.... .t d; ±:G24 { i (yer'.A"`Fl:, t}.~_~: a~`~~~ + fix` •P•:.x`_rr9^ - '"yt:'^ ..~'t}+' a~`YK "Xt di 4 =•'r `''i V S ~ 'r" .~~J~'t•- Yoh:; t 'sk''t'3~., ~ d :1. rf 4\ « r" d r•, ✓ `T . m, a t` Y tt cc'r'. ,r'e ,'~.tr % w~,1t.~t.',?~,; ,.v a• i'A 'I a.; ~ ! ~ 3•~:w, tCCS~'-1 ,4 ; .,•.'s» ,i~'<"'~r~Fe~~a~t i"a:,9:f.ati3'v.S::w:rr•F "rx'i,~•;R`-~' `{7, ,.fit. r•i y r A ,f,~' a< '.•e!t°As ~"~,"i y'. ! s :rMy.,-;,r„~, .4d"t :a 1; .i~w'~r ;F,,. r;' + 't . -x --tO' i,y1i h -V M~s':Y kr t' X f \ tt4 "?t. ¢ •'~'"'vt' > p ` ga"~jr l•~.. U kc §r.p;ps"a77t~' «a it", (n r' W+ s tst( 7 f~d'~=p",,s }it.4, , a ''•k 1, • P`t i 31. N'.MY,a'-•~~ _ ~tr~'~:.~~,s.~.',~r. ~tq`7 -,i ::r ,ay,`r` c ~,r. n-:acv"~~,,..^ c,,, n,.,,.^.', , W11, wt w'° a. e r E `l -r MIMI` Wtlr, 041 F a. `°f~N r-~f ~,,tt,,,, .r~ • Q,•jT~i-: v.3~-VAT. ,~4h f3 ' t•7r"',•„ X'Y . r~R'~^.Ea°~bj,q~.y~t s;4Cz° "4 li/\~.3p -2k (D I Oki WyS... S y rYgj ~,t,,• 1/.~' • _.i : L~ ' } 1 0 ,.3. S C. !K;'.. r~r~-H~ is . "r i • } 1 3 7 . , ^'f at a ; "a.vy: ± ,`::4' ,~y .~,F.` .•~..y~", a ~,w^1;'~ rp i.`SV{Y~t,# t, ,,';y;',^aa,t°F ."~`.;1n'F"~ d~v. ° d 'Y r'4 " ° y' v'' ~ - " tbt fGj.{ ..t'SS~r'+^i~"r'Y,~~Y+,~~^''ti :.~;a-fir 'r-r •«1x''4r`\Y~ ~l~6~~ ~..•`R1`• A- 1* `~y;`.R ~i ,w•tt,.J. ~s:~; ':,:w a .'";tg,.. t , x"•r; . i ~^kk• ~i;+ ra' y'p ~ "St =5't,'_ i7i_,- - 1 ' -.S • ~ ,,a: S^ '"5 ~ 3 . r^.}3'.'i• .=A^'YGI,r.. t ` - a u 5 N. i2}'✓ , r,L: i$,•• •:~.,.a,,., ,.'f t. sf15:'a" ,•~i° r ~•~'i'" 't .s. .'.t. 'r::f. •u`xd vbd ~:~i`' Tt,•,3',.: ;V /„E:tf" Ft.t: ~P ?,Y°- t~ x- r.r Y;•:; a ' :°t y ad. S, # , y r a 'pp., f'°*• , z a. a .w 5 s 'K a r ,:r~ 1a• s. n~''~i~~g,;.\ c"a`b'. ~-y-. 1'•• ht^i~ ui ~ht AM^.9'x'~"~'. .'~~c n.s#n 'rM.~1; rr.; i•~`~~~ yi-a'"'`->n", 1~~y ;:L n _ Yy .pit t'•x ,,•Y.`y,, ..;~t. ~a't~.,'ts; rte`'"n,~•.~.'1:,,i.+s:~.`;e#§y,Yr". r~,°'dy1~i, `/~~!,~~x«a.?y_,',. •8 .cK"' `'tly'<C:d+.; d= r ' ,Sn.: ~w,',; 3 •'•F .w .i. \V r>..,,', r.± ,b a- "4a... _'i-. - ,:t, n:3 `:a•~ ..°9`le-{t.~, ,t: r, r. .a±!:'~.~::s'ff'",:.g'?~;.~''' , O "'~Y. :`r:'. '»l,. ,'a,gs-•4~t~?:``f, e. t,l-"1~:.'~ ii~~.~g;.~':.y.. ,,,R, ,~5,:, ax'tx. .•;p i~~rli. ,'ti .'"s, ~,;i;2'~ :rs' ea`vr .~;.,=~~,4 .y :~t'. ;ai~: ~'Cm .;+~v' r . da ,i ~ avr,{~~•_~e Y'a rt,, °.1a:, ~r`.3` d, ri*~w wt~';~,:45~'A'.;r ~4as E„ .g,~M l3c~i~:`q.>{°~„~~:"cs• ,t n3:.. ~`~xi~ `~t,~N~t ~n .p''~t" x... -',,,,.z`::irp;%",„+,`",' •t`3_,"y,r':t{5 ~:;'.d.••~ii'3a1e^,"''.'. ~t "qs'. ra5;»., •r ;"i7'a :'>',ry Y'e "h,. ':kt• iN...6, f F.2ta„}d fir,. a ""-*tx°i` c'c~, ,'Ex, ! y z n t ' } ' d S '*t, ,tn.. •Y Y' r ~"~k~''. e.+l x:;+r:+ + k , s. i:: .,,'fit ° C m.Y« • :d^'s«'r'+,<. `'~4,"c~~~r. '.C-t~!x't ',•k'r. t. t'. _rF'w rn ■/p~) R~°2i: ,"<:4~~i':~i"---.~ ,yi. 'e. Vx'~r wx•S.'~it, ~t=Q 't"~i~'YY. Yt~yr:>',.~a-..j.,s ~6~"~'~i~• ee /}~'+'i%"`-" e•\,V ..,w, _ ary Ard, ~ a. Ly"9r''+}. .a€.. .y'~xcr'.''k"`',=,}`e.er,S",•'.~3.n.t x~e.'`.Y'~y;4•.:~p ••~a. - :.:~.:,5~+.`• x,x rr~ a-"L ,tt'. F•R, 7 "a4 's. 'ks e, ',.'a'2.'r`~x* 'i''y".:.`.;"~ ~2 n~ h'~ G~'^ ~Y .fd*, '1 t.'a;,, } ~ t,! :5 , .~i'.•~(~'~. ~..'R "La4t °7~,t ".'1' t'"'.4ti.'h'7~°'i~ M:, wtd•t:.. ~<.y„~ ,.;Z , k+',':. , e L 1. m E~a"+`; x .t ys bL ..kr, ,k'1~' +g..3:~.?.`, „y w, ;,w• `sl~s~1;>~':%ria .^'4t,a, C karat. `•Y .x :'~.x..: v. ~ ~:^v,r,..•g , ~ .y.~ . ,„tM'r ss~ # :~g: • t.l#, ..5a u .:~;h.~'~r?> °'~4'• u-.."p .mN:J+~~~' "T Y~.i., ~..u .d dt4w ~alg?'''•^tl~: ..,.}'a`" •xu ..N. i~ k~'+'•! .t..~kx+',+,•wi"r~-"t,-'e .t >ri;'$`a' tilt, r` . ,;+x r g .G..!;.~.a.<' r3; rrr' , .F,.IS . $ Sir i !m'f d::t?te :.q"„__••'@1;r^.F,:€ ' .,rc,;t:'. g .l-rY": ro"', r.r:':x; ;7 .1;,<'t r:•k.# a. .wy,.,EI; x;{ a?': .x, «zyp>r'„.:} > ;i; ' F:} •P; it* "s, a .w :x:.•• 'l=- L,i.; o:S-"Mr; - + ~'i•~e `~;",ti' .gr 'a'.',~.. ; a~ k' ~ Z t'-_,ar :~'x.•.. x'•- ,:'-:,a 77`;; ; .-a_).. 'i- .Ft';.,Fvy i.'ro ::>•H.:=:,. 5'. .Jw.r::n=. :>r>..r :'y.`r- t"' `t q,• ,ty_7, C.•u,l • :~Ct ,a ' ..v ~ 9.:. ~ •x+` i., » . -*P°.' „ :7 ' !3.¢:«' :S„ '-.if'•°~Y. a:'ry ~t •p~itt •w;•Ct» ,..'~..,;1 <::s'.' :!'~j% ~F•'.; ° 0.. , k' .''f:,', , }s ~ t _ t n ,fi t`ti.~'r~.nd'.. t. k£+>s.l n: ;.'i .,ta' C.~.• ,to '',a,,. k::,F, B,t,...... :^g:"~ 3 ~a`Pq' a.- 1. ..s,. ''^•C^t^. «•titx.:x+,:s". • aM : `r: ,kva r" .:a . :a`'~»'ro 2N, 1, s-F;~_Ci. SFr, ".l"', o Sa> t .';zr.;y'y,•t. e'``h'''. .Ltd; :'~xF O' . °'''M...-..•.x., a `e .a,}.,. :i ,.1 'i',vy. .}St.,.:t.=<. ~'rd..~ ~ 4.~••\.. c+.4s 5.^:."i ~ 'j~" on! ? iw: i Cy" ' r~f , } « w.4'\. 'k5 M r+d ~-'.'vn '4P "4„k,,:~..• lp •i'S*,~ 3'"`' str ~'4:`~:Y,: ' `isu"E •e,°'" •x'k'~Wi. 6 ,r.:: .d t a.'4' , ly ' •.-.M ~ , i t~+,i, s~t 4 ~ P,1• Y a3 k- 5• : ,,y, ' i'>'. a,i`fr,. : Sn a'"'x>i•'ar •..:t+"< ...~::`.tiaaSS~ `S' ~ w * < • a. ~S. x,.Ra":,.' " v; ' t i tA.. ` q. , ' E •r°S ~S' t • ' ^,,.,'ck': CD `ir` ~t',:' ew'•• ~;~i .La ='S- t` •,t`,"; °'~,r~*~9`; i•. n r..: ..r.: .a p.. •t. v?,?. •°,d`.,'•' .+;7•, .~~:i~'~~:r^;{'~`.,~•. =w ,.1 .?M.. •3.'. :.a •'.a r T`.'t.x-. 9. i.a" L;.r ::;7°;a we.~~. t,l 'Ej « - 4t - '~M`I~x. ':.~e4'r"[;?:!;,,:^' •:+'"'hw,. y., •,,~.,°ad, f '•c.;'.:" "a;PH'v it a'i'~arNR„a'?;1't•~, :'.},",~w,»„y •`5>:•e , ,5/~ .'i~m ~r`a'• ~'e>t' w. e: '~'S:'l,ti?{~' - - .i.~ UP '•b"`o,s?, :r' ^.'s'• C-n ..''»~x•"<,;.„',,s a`, tya'2 xaatei. v".~` N."h'''t~' r. : ..le e"~°~.•; "Nip. Yy . V13 ' r '.1.- ta'a~J--t~'~r., \~'"a°~w rae;~4~§F+t~ ry, '"a'.,y'''' •4 ' 4:_ . ~."i ~ ~ , ,S.. ";dt'i`a~•~`,^C'9a.11. ~„l'h•;' 1, ,iii"ai:. d~. .':1';,•• :"6 2• a'` ~t ,i". ! .t..,.;t '.'"'r„ `•p. ~~.°.~°'§4ka Y3't.t 4E,Ii.;~ a.r{~T'.`gw~'• vrvF'~ Yta:y; ::.pr.:r r''i'r"''•. ,11'. "'.+CF=a, `='K1 , n. a~ _ 'fir ,'fir r ~5,:8r : r.?" ri _ g,~,. ;r~r,. ;R„ki~ jt, ~.'.s~i =:'~'t°-°.r• .emu '~r ~~t'°°' °'°a'"'. ..9 '.x"s~ .<Y";' mg, ~3.~'$'i .:i~;~'^ :ss"A '14"; _ -s 4'", •~y:- -'t Ns'a„-';`r=" -'S; ,x`..'' `3' in It bd" rte. _ tjPo j';,. ; •i5.~- r W6bit site cog.y.nai.n4f= :feeds 74 3 r . ~-ter r . a' AP,•~}+c.",''r° :i•,,,-~'?1 ''ir''~,':~sp",,s. ,4, .','i g _ - -°Si•,'ii~; `.t v3,°.-.'•°: ZT°°~.,, -8~,^.N: :5:~ 1' -Cr~;'!~ a:r3R S~' ` ~'.'3.~5• r SS c ent`pshowsch§an 3es. " ,t ....r- k fA n 'r'• ?g h .,,rte,-. g " 'iY YS-:v rt s,,-4~S yfi:, .ifi,y"ST"!,.k•'^~:$F; y1i ZS~i: i--b" i D i'Yu G- e , Abilon News Aggregator Fie Edt .View . 'Tool`s,°-<:=He c ' t ^f'. ° a: - r t~ - m y 5t le. ewsPa ~artide2~0,1558,1836416;00;asp.kr"ETR550212g "J 0000532~r .Y„ , rs P > F ;ti:.• r eeds Tree : x ° `Feeds°° { LockerGnome 901100 f..,. Lockergnome s IT Profession:) ,s w .w ite w :.Tttle _ Lockergnome's Linux Fanatic:- I - = tit r 6, S" To Ac!%tire LCOS.Mak' :.0: - Bh iah .Y?? Lockergnome's OS X Fdnaticl, et > r S; ntaz .Ta. y ' aide ial,on=silrcon LCoS dis la~ ~ "ivyiderBiilliaii-I _ Lockergnome s Web Develops ( ) - p y:p Locker nome'aWindowaFan. s~idWedaesday;thstit„agreed toteyquiredbyarotlur*=' pW= ;`ms's. / en," ` z,Fe>s.. K; ..,x. Makel.BCllllan,' _ ` Windows File of the Day (151 pmpon ;SYntaxq;bi!psCo - .ADV: FRFf .1'LzHITE PAPER from Akd j ry y All 'Unread Consumers have gone finrr MMting ut line to `vrorking online-=31 -in' Liquid-crystal-on-silicon - - to access-th people tools and servxes,tt~ey Memories; need Leam'a,~ y _ f:s_ r;s °:,.f'C' :.:t,i r~:s; ,':,`_r•. 1v~"-i'•-~"TU'-m'b~-+„~~., ""?..x °:a` . .,n r,'y°.~g~d - =YS -"Y.y-'p ~^?r~•r9 n," r~ ~,'~'j yq`~'f.~: w,`~ f"Y "...2ir - , a: rr x Via- "",,c4r 14lily a,~ ma=r b Cn~a:afer * t' _...r ' - t ° s r• ~ e r+.e• r r, 3.`.`,..s a:; ..4 z . ^,y ~,,•sx .,y-y~jiy~`rx'~ .,t4''~:_."d, ~':5,rj.-D'_D~,.~~ p: .rr ~v; ~ .'€~•i:*r fi `e,~-s~ yrX`-.n '4`c~'r ,AS; ac ".'+,.•z: .'Y~i v' F 3 :°+~,,'sa -e ' t. chi c' y", -.j: 3<'-,11' S y-~s-r~,~,:y-4+~sa;_~.:1_: Z.; _'29 _ °C'-'°'~°,~'~`'"~,.~ - 't:i ~`yts"~3'~=.s.. "s.•{¢ - '.z~. -tip •.a. -.m w,S=_' y„< - 'z''f~d.'^. wvzi; „ ' _ 3 J", ° ~F--s . .'emu rat: •.i _ ',..r> 'C° ,-ny•"`' K4 ~'f" _ \ :13 t Date of Talk: July 26th, 2005, City Council Study Session Speakers: Gary g~r_enfejq, Director IT; Louis Sears, LAN Tech Slides: PowerPoint Presentation f ' Recommendation: [ e_agyy, if implemented, should be by hosted by a vendor, + High Level Summary Listserv - Allows for people to join and un-join an email list via email without having to have a person adding an deleting users to groups. Email message sent to the..group when something to announce pertinent to that group. 'Costs/Setup includes staff time to create the email, the cost of hosting the listserv and what lists will be offered. Alternative - RSS - which contains ""feeds" to updated web content and RSS client informs users of changes and short blurb. 4, 1 I Liz'Newton - Re: Advisory Committee Survey Pa e 1 ~ ~ ✓Ve tub c) ~i. From: Rich Margeruni <rdm@uoregon.edu> y ootvnGr!' To: "Liz Newton" <LIZ@ci.tigard.or.us> , a •oJ - Date: 7/22/2005 9:28:41 PM Subject: Re: Advisory Committee Survey Y Shy Sgssi ay) Liz, . a Pa 3 Thanks for your reply. Please find a draft of the survey attached. e . ` . q . Please note that the survey is currently being reviewed'by some "experts". and will. be tested, with a small sample before being -7. d (o • O~ rY1 i ~-ci' finalized. If you have any comments on it; P. lease let me know. ' eSJ • Thanks ; Rich Margerum >Mr. Margerum, > >Mr Prosser has asked me to respond to your email: l.would be >interested in seeing a copy of the survey questions to determine if the :Tigard Boards and Committees whose members you are interested in >surveying' >are structured with the focus on process, you are looking for. >Sincerely, >Liz Newton >Assistant.to the City Manager Rich.Margerum <rdm@uoregon.edu>.7/21/2005 2:59;06 PM >craig@ci.tigard.or.us >City of Tigard >Dear Mr. Prosser (Interim),' >1 recently sent you a•Ietter about'a study'of >advisory committees that I am conducting with the >League of Oregon Cities. Several people asked for. >an, Email version of this letter because it was >easier to distribute.lf a response is-.already` >being compiled-thank you'in advance for.the :information. >As noted in our letter,. th'e goal of the study is >to learn how committee approaches to-process and >decision making can improve their performance. >The study is funded by the University of Oregon >and the League of Oregon Cities. >We would like to survey the members of the following. City of Tigard >committees: >1. Committee for Citizen Involvement. >2. Downtown:Task Force/Commuter Rail,, >3. Library Board . >4. Park and Recreation Advisory Board ' >5. Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force >If the City of Tigard is willing to participate, Liz'Newton - Re Advisory Committee Survey Page 2 >please send me the names, Email addresses and >mailing addresses of the members of these >committees. Please also provide the staff contact >for this committee. If the list of committee >members is available electronically, it is >easiest to Email it to us. If you believe any of >these committees would not be appropriate to . >survey, please let us know. ' >Please email committee Names, Email addresses and mailing addresses >to: > Name: Richard Margerum > Header: Committee survey > Email address: rdm@uoregon.edu > Information: Committee member names, >Email addresses and mailing addresses >The details about the study are summarized below. >Please feel free to contact me if you have any >questions: >Sincerely, >Rich, Margerum >Associate Professor >University of Oregon >Research Procedures >Once a list of committee members has been >assembled, we will send out a survey to.the >committee members. The survey will ask the >members about: The decision making process Their description of how the group was led Their satisfaction with the group process' >*-Their satisfaction with the outcomes of the process " >If you would like to review the survey before it >is sent, we can send you. a copy.' >We will contact the committee members by Email ` >and ask them to complete the survey on line: We' >will mail a written copy of the survey to people >for whom we have no Email'address. We will also >mail a written survey to non-respondents. The >respondents will also be invited to participate >in a follow-up phone or Email interview to >explore issues that arose from the survey. This >component of the study will be contingent upon >time and funding. >The contact details for the City of Tigard >committee members will be used solely for. this >study and will not be shared with any other >organization without your. permission. If city >staff decide that it is not appeopriate,to >participate, you can withdraw your participation w. Page 3 Liz'Newton - Re: Advisory Committee Survey. _ ' >at any time. Likewise, committee members will be >informed that their participation is.voluntary, ?their responses are confidential, and that they >are free to decline to participate by not . >returning the survey. >Results >A report summarizing the findings from the study >will be available through the League of Oregon >Cities. If there are an adequate number of ' >responses to ensure confidentiality, a summary of >the findings each city will also be reported. >Dr. Richard D. Margerum >Associate Professor • . .>Planning, Public Policy and Management >134 Hendricks Hall >1209 University of Oregon >Eugene OR 97403-1209 >Ph: 541-346-2526 >Fax: 541-346-2040 Dr. Richard D. Margerum Associate Professor Planning, Public Policy and Management 134 Hendricks Hall 1209 University, of Oregon Eugene OR 97403-1209 Ph: 541-346-2526 Fax: 541-346-2040 Liz'Newton - DM Survey 07c.doc _ - Page 1 DRAFT for REVIEW' . Number for tracking purposes: i 1 e ~ ry ' Committees r k A Survey of Oregon Committee Members Background The purpose of this survey, is to obtain feedback about the process and procedures of local government advisory committees, boards and commissions in Oregon. The study is funded by the University of Oregon and the Oregon League of Cities. If you have questions about this survey, please contact me (phone: 541-346-2526; E-mail: rdm@uoregon.edu). Why is this survey being conducted? This survey is being conducted to help cities improve how they bse and•run advisory committees. A copy of the results from this study will be provided to your city, but data for individual committees will not be specified. Your responses are confidential. . Follow-up phone interview If you are willing to participate in a brief follow-up phone or E-mail interview, please list your contact _ details. You may be contacted to take part in a confidential audiotaped interview that will take about 20 minutes. Daytime phone: E-mail: [These phone numbers will only be used for this research and not released to any other individuals] Thank you, -Richard D. Margerum Richard D. Margerum Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management University of Oregon Eugene OR 97403 Notes (1) Please answer all questions - partially completed surveys are not useful. (2) Your response is confidential. (3) Please return the completed survey hi the envelope provided. Thank you - your results will be very helpf ull Liz'Newton - DM Survey_07c.doc ~~~rt~ Page 2; DRAFT for REVIEW 1. Information About Your Committee In this section, I would like to know some, basic information about your committee. Please put an D in the box .that most closely resembles your response. 1. Which term best describes your role on the committee? (Choose only one) V Chair V Member - V Other Officer Other (describe): r Facilitator. ' 2 Dld ou represent an organization on the committee? \ J No (go to question 3) V Yes (if yes, please choose one listed below:) V Business . s Government (local, regional, state, federal) V Non-profit or Community group V . Other (describe): 3. Are you still a committee member? , V Yes V No, I left the committee in: Year 4. How important were the following factors in motivating you to join this committee?'(Answer all) Very Somewhat Not Don't Important Important, Important Know a. Solve a problem of concern to me V V V V b + Represerit my orgamzation' IV V - "Ac c. Gain public sector experience V V V V d~Meet people m the community= V- V ZAW T' T, - r e. Other: V = _ V V 2. How are your committee meetings run? (Answer all 3) Always -Sometimes Never Don't Know! Not Relevant a. Meetings are run by an independent V. V V V facilitator b Meetings;are run by the committee chair f 1, h`4x Sfl ii 3$t rt. e c. If meetings are run by the chair-how often - - - does he/she participate in the content of the discussion All answers are confidential ~.a - Page 3 'Newton - DM Survey 07c.doc , , . DRAFT for REVIEW. Set by Don't by the Set by both committee Know he direction of City Who do-you believe sets t Set the committee? - - a. All answers are confidential Liz Newton - DM Survey 07c.doc~ Page 4 DRAFT for REVIEW II. Advisory Committee Structure & Context am interested to know your thoughts about the background of the committee. Please put an ❑X in the box that best reflects yourresponse to the statement. Strongly Strongly 1. The'committee includes a Disagree: Neutral Agree broad cross'section of participants. Don't Know'/. No Answer. ' 2x1 knew other people on the ®ongly ~ Strongly' >t DisagrFPNcural Agree,' 2committee before I started T," Mlz r:•h~Don t Know / No Answer -M _JLJ~ 3., The goals and objectives of 'Strongly l Strongly Disagree' Neutral Agree, the committee are clear. V V V V V V V. V V Don't Know I No Answer r, ~tiongly Strongly:': 'd The city staff do a good job of Disagree he,utml Agr,Ee r` supporttngAhe committee. - s - V w ~ . " 7 -TV -y fpp tKno Y'4No Answer x i:-~ Sf u e rc c tom' n x-- v $ p. y~f wA... EN The climate in which the Strongly Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree committee works is political. V. V. V V V V Don't Know I No Answer x; f< St~bngly J} ~ { ~ gy„ 64 The~dtrect~onsof'-the 66mmY~'7 itte2e z , 4:. Strop I: Disagree Neutral Agree . is set bythec~ty. - - - - - - - - 74 µ D 6k on t-Kn / No Answer r: rx III. Advisory Committee Approach to Difficult Decisions Think of an issue that raised a lot of debate. Read the statements below and look 'at the two descriptions provided at the ends of the scale. Place an ❑x in the box along the scale that you think best describes the committee's approach How would you describe the Extensive discussion with 1 2 3 : 4 5' 6 7 8 9 10 Limited time and ' committee's approach to . opportunity for all opportunity for discussion discussion? members to contribute _ - - V- - - - - - - Don't Know l No Answer r` t o 'ze t ' 'i j F s P'ui 7; _How would your describe the Works hard to try to 1 2 3 4 5 a x 6 7 8 9 10 7, Des not work;foist{~ f achieve a reement cif all:; wcom lete a ree e t a committees approach to 9 p g £ , deC1310f1~maklnQ~ t members of the group - - - . - ; . - - Doll ( Know t No Answer rt ; All answers are confidential ' Liz' Newton - DM SurveL_ c.doc Page 5 DRAFT for REVIEW How would you describe the Nearly everyone agrees 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A narrow majority agrees committee's agreement on with decisions of the with the decisions of the important topics of debate?. committee. - - - - - - - committee. Don't Know / No Answer All answers are confidential Liz'Newton - DM SurVey_07c.doc Page 6 DRAFT for REVIEW 'IV. Advisory Committee Communication I am interested to know your thoughts about how well the committee communicates. Please put an in the box that best reflects your response to the statement. 1. People on the committee Strongly Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree communicate openly. V V V V V V. V V Don't Know / No Answer V ppo o Strongly Strongly f 2` k[have,the ortunity t D153yrE2 NeUlfcil. Agree-.c lY l - r£F contribute to committee' - e ,discussions x ; fi Don t4Know I NoAnswer 3. I am comfortable expressing Strongly - Strongly Disagree.. Neutral Agree my ideas and views V V V V V V - V' - Don't Know I No Answer 't,. 'uw+e n•, ? y'r.w -slrOfl~ `r e.r rSly rongly . 4People.on the committee a-•F c ~w...~ax e ,~r Disagree Neutral Agree'4 _ listen to each other w Don`t Know ! NofAnswer 4, ~a 5. People' are respectful of Strongly Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree each other at the meetings V T 4. V V V - V V V Don't Know 06 Answer V 'Strongly Strongly4y. 47 6: ~ Whem people on the Disagree Neutral Agree` committee ra~se~an issue ~ c~ Don t Know /'No Answer b ` r Z-L 7. We are able to-discuss Strongly Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree difficult issues effectively. - - - - V , - - V Don't Know / No Answer All answers are confidential Liz Newton - DM Survey 07c.doc Page 7 DRAFT for REVIEW . V. Advisory Committee Process I am interested, to know your thoughts about the committee process. Please put an in.the, box that best reflects your response to the statement. ' 1. The committee explores the Strongly Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree . interests and positions of V V V V V V V V V all committee members. Don't Knowl No Answer ~wM , Strdngly xe` x r3;, C fig t x Stron lye Committee members create 7~ x s . 'Wk V` Mf M , Disagree ~~Neutral7 ^Agree, opbonsltoihelpareach - tr~10~ Jragreement:4tt, ,t1~' r xr«~3A~ ,ay.fr s , n - "i t,~. 'irk.. 4~t ic.yr ~^J4~' -.x} ~ tyt~~'~+w.k ,y,. ~~3 ~•1,,,.)~Lr ~ -`~+.L, ~ ~r`~ n'k ^s~9` 1w ir~:Gx-' Sig 'k-(, s u• "'U• b4Y~ i`~ fi h ~j~'-, k ~¢l 1 •~,~.r > f}itPF t s ~4i,t` C' 1K;.~_r.•a1r1... ~f-`_.:-x..Y~`".~., r..~zc:uri v.r..!aa. ~cv..~•w~.:.,.:k.>r'E>sts ~ ~ r:::.z~:a::'~..o.f~s.~ :a..:~`.A..t 3. The chair/facilitator is fair. Strongly Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Don't Know / No Answer V V V V V V V V V. . ~lti~a d 4 ti Fy "k, $St(Onglya At}C r.gi Yr•'~•-' y,Rtg" ✓f~.'KM'+{i''z9, S0•rlt' RZI TMechair/facil~tator,is N t,. rya Y ,o p Disa reex n Neutral a r ~c Agr i'4. ,7 Ott ,V ng t;,5'.~~ cwt yY' ee VA 'L~~ kk~,4 =4Y'±'.~ 4;..~~ a Wr r .,r u { i~4 Don t Know I No Answer - 4~I ¢ a r k~ fr rpy x'V~ yi`.r'~"~ F'yw a v r 7 ~C' '~Y •N+~C t 'Y 4 ~ ~ a#~! y ey k ~ x Y ~?t 'n _ I~ i ,,i~'~- ~ t, k•~a~~i, dY ~,S` 5. The committee handles Strongly Strongly Disagree, Neutral Agree conflict effectively. V V V V, V Don't Know No Answer - " :';ms's` §L z k_ ^S '7.ACJ2F"t~'y . wt !"r~ E~ .dA_i3 Iron t-s "1, .a. 2~„•kh s...aw5 twat:u RStron I ~;t's e•' P The committee has~clearrr9zY~ fi r ; w g y; #ltr p 'a rr t : 5i~ ''A , „~D sragree~ t. _a1-. eutral~; ' < °rulesafor reaching, ~E s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.p„`?#w:'tln"'Rtt& ::ty +"'k nY'' a`xy,ykl`~..z~•+t,~'"•t? rz.,.'f'`!a'" a a,,M1tS ~,a -yt. " ' n A decisions r>, , 4~ ~ ~ti~,.,~~ ~ ~ r frlS'~',: 0. 7yy: ,i D k F1+rwfx-0 ,j } 6 rw,Nr y*,2-:'+w-' '-`t' ~-.qsk ~`S+'•` -~k ;.min. ~x.~~=., :p x,..' n`w ~ ~ k X"ri ~ -~a. ~+~~ez i ~ t;j.= vgrf ,~^~a;?h'~F~N 5~ s ,u?t,,-k;; . ~ ~'it x.,.,.:S.1k41....wf......-.. ~L•s,......_,. .6 w.'~s...,.Q.~y~1.:L'.._Ln~. k. ~ ":•,~..$._tvu,f.:rs_.c~'a.:2~„is.a_dit~.,tio:t`~^iLf:C. ~.,........sdS '_a :.ui..xY.....,-..9.~ea 7. The committee process is Strongly Strongly Disagree Neutral' Agree fair to all members.. - - V ,V V V, V V V Don't Know / No Answer All answers are confidential Liz Newton - DM Survey_ %.doc ~ Page 8' DRAFT for REVIEW VI. Advisory Committee Outcomes I am interested to know your thoughts about the committee outcomes. Please put an in the box that best reflects your response to the statement. 1. The committee is producing Strongly Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree high quality work. T - - V V V - - V Don't Know / No Answer c~.i ' ' -.Strongly,: - _ _ - ~ SUo gly~rt Z j,n commjttb has a Disagree-,, Ntutr3l Agee, , hared ~tston~ ; - - - - . - ~ J Y" i - 4 c it - } 21 t s t; - ^ .r, Don t Know 1 No Answer;t t e _ r ..n .-...t { t,. T2-~ '_.:.t~. ::.:v.%~~ _ w.... r. r-..t.. w ..YsS ..-"l~~u. ::'S.~Li ' 3. The committee-has Strongly Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree developed'creative ideas or V. solutions. Don't Know I No Answer V Strongly ' - Strongly, have confidence in the_`. Disagree Neutral Agee'}.; t'results~ roduced by . the; - - ~k ~•5, Don tKnow /'No Answer5~ ,t; ~ : _ 5,~. _ r_. . ~.J:SrF'! 5. Members are highly . Strongly Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree committed to the goals of - - - - - - - - - the committee. Don't Know / No Answer `Members h`a've `developed a Strongly r`k Strongly` i.•- 6 Disagree_ Neutral - hgree ~good understandingof the -V V_ - - - aissues $ „ ; y , x~.t # Don tKnow / No Answerr~ 7. There is mutual respect Strongly Strongly, Disagree • Neutral Agree among committee V V V V V V V V V members. Don't Know I No Answer t Strongly, ~ z on 8 "Trust and openness exist Disagrees NeutralA ~ege~~ ~r F f r g T among committee -V V V V. v ,a members • `~'~FDontKnow/~NoAns'wey,~ ~::x„ a .~~~a' . The,work of the committee Strongly Strongly has led to spin off activities Disagree V V V V V Neutral Agree V V V by group members. Don't Know I No Answer All answers are confidential I Liz Newton - DM Survey_07c.doc Page 9 DRAFT for REVIEW, Strongly Strongly,: 10I,advoeafe'for the. isa ree= Neutr~l X greet 4. Scommittee s work m other >,forums ~r' 'Don t Know I No Answer qtr Al All answers are confidential Liz Newton - DM Survey_07c.doc Page 10 DRAFT for REVIEW VII. Your Overall Satisfaction On a scale of 1-10, please rate how'satisfied you were with your committee on each of the criteria listed' below. Please place an ❑x in the appropriate box (answers between boxes or in multiple boxes cannot be used). How would you rate your overall Very Very . satisfaction with the committee Unsatisfied Satisfied process? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7' 8 9. 10 V V V. V V O Don't Know / No Answer V yHow would yo uxrate,yourFoverall Very; - - ,t .Y - ' = }Very t r satisfaction with,the committees. • •'Unsatlsfied Satisfied z<M,: w s: 1 2 =3 5 g 7_,' 8 G Kj i<acC01'11pllShm@ntS~ - r;Don t Know 1 No Answer r How would you rate your overall Very Very satisfaction with the cif Unsatisfied . ' . Satisfied response to committee 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8' , 9 10 recommendations? V V; V T, V • V V V Don't Know / No Answer VIII. Short Comments 1. What do you think are,the strengths of the committee? 2. What do you think are the weaknesses of the committee?* $"x e 3. If there is one thing you could change about the committee what would it bey Y 4 ~ 4o t Please complete last page All answers are confidential ~Lz~Newton - DM Survey _07cdo- c Page .11 DRAFT for REVIEW IX. Important Demographic Data The following information about yourself is very important to help us analyze the composition of committees. Place an 0 in.the box that most closely resembles your response. This information is confidential: (1) Age v. Y (2) Gender: V M V F -`z - ' . (3) Ethnicity and Race (check all that apply) ` _ e ~ ; • • , V Hispanic/Spanish/Latino White V Black or African American V Asian Mt , Native American, Native Alaskan . V Other: (4) Years lived in this city: yrs . 7.nR ~V (5) Previous Experience with Advisory, Committees: V None, this is my first advisory committee One previous committee V Two or more previous committees Please feel free to add additional (6) What is the highest degree or level of school you have comments: completed? V Less than high school High school or equivalent V Some college., V Bachelor's'degree V . Graduate degree (Masters, Professional, PhD) (7) What category best describes your current situation? V . Employed' V Retired V Looking for work/unemployed V Home maker Student V Disabled/unable to work V Other: (8) What is'your total'household income from all sources before taxes? V . Lessthan $15,000 V $15,000 t6,$25,000 $25,000 to $40,000 V $40,000 to $70,000. All answers'are confidential . yM Page 12 i} 07c.doc ~ DM Survey _ !,Newton-' DRAFT for REVIEW $70,000 to $100,000. Over $100,000 All answers are confidential AGENDA ITEM NO.2 - CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE : JULY 26, 2005 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on'other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through,staff. Please contact the City Manager prior to the start of the meeting. Thank You. This is a City of Tigard public meeting,. subject to'the State of Oregon's public -meeting, and records laws. Aill written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of T%gard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, . which is a. public record. NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED 9 7z 3 yt g 7 Z~3 P ~►-aF w . CITIZEN COMMUNICATION Page '1 AGENDA ITEM # 3.0- FOR AGENDA OF 7/26/05 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Approve Workers' Compensation'Group Self-Insurance-Plan through CCIS PREPARED BY: Loreen Mills DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL The City's new workers' compensation insurance carrier, City County Insurance Services Pool, requires the Council to approve a resolution recognizing CCIS as the self-insurance plan of choice within 30 days-of coverage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution declaring the,City's intent to participate in the CCIS group self-insurance prograrn for Workers' Compensation coverage.' INFORMATION SUMMARY The City goes out to the insurance market each, year to obtain Workers' Compensation (WC) coverage. The State of Oregon requires the City to provide WC insurance. ' The City's Insurance Agent of Record, 'JBL&K, is responsible for the marketing of the City's account. During June 2005, the City received- two quotes for WC insurance. The bid results were as follows for an annual, prepay premium: ■ City County Insurance. Services (CCIS) $160,876 ■ State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) : $182,464 (City's carrier since 1996) Since there is an annual savings of'$21,588 with CCIS, the City changed from SAIF on 7/l/05:, CCIS requires all new WC group self-insurance program members to have a resolution adopted by the governing board within 30 days of coverage to foimally. declare the City's intent to participate in the program. The action scheduled this evening will fulfill that requirement for the new,.program. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None since CCIS was low bid for Workers' Comp coverage and results in a savings of over $21,000. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A f ATTACHMENT LIST Attached is a resolution declaring the City's intent to participate in the CCIS group self-insurance program for workers' compensation coverage. FISCAL NOTES The cost for workers' compensation insurance for the 2005-2006 fiscal year is $160,876. There are adequate funds in the budget for this expenditure. i AGENDA ITEM # 3 3 FOR AGENDA OF 7/26/05 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE A' r e Workers' Com nsation Volunteer Coverage throu h'CCIS PREPARED BY: Loreen Mills 1 DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL The City's new workers' compensation insurance carrier, City County Insurance Services Pool, requires the Council to approve a resolution to extend workers' compensation to the City's volunteers within 30 days of coverage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution declaring the City's intent to extend workers' compensation to the City's volunteers. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City of Tigard has long acknowledged the value of services rendered by its volunteers. 'As part of the City's ongoing commitment to the volunteer program, workers'. compensation insurance has been provided to volunteers for several years. Oregon Revised Statute 656.031 requires jurisdictions to determine whether workers' compensation insurance will be provided to volunteers. In 1998, the City Council considered providing health care coverage and accidental death & dismemberment insurance to all volunteers instead of workers' comp coverage for injury/death of volunteers if occurring during their volunteer activities with Tigard. Based on cost of the health care insurance and the desire to reduce the City's liability exposure with volunteers, the City Council determined volunteers would be covered through the workers' compensation insurance. As Council is aware, during June 2005, the City received two quotes for WC insurance. The bid results were as follows for an annual prepay premium for all' City employees and the volunteers: ■ City County Insurance Services (CCIS) $160,876 ■ State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) $182,464 (City's carrier since 1996) Since there is an annual savings of $21,588 with CCIS, the City chan ged from SAIF on 7/1/05. CCIS requires City Council to adopt a resolution declaring the City's intent to extend workers' compensation to the City's volunteers within 30 days of coverage. • The action scheduled this evening will fulfill this requirement for the new program. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None since the CCIS premium provides a $21,588 annual savings. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A ATTACHMENT LIST Attached is a resolution declaring the City's intent to extend workers' compensation to the City's volunteers: FISCAL NOTES The cost for workers' compensation insurance for the 2005-2006 fiscal year is $160,876 to provide coverage for both.employees and volunteers. There are adequate funds in the budget for this expenditure since the City based the budget amount on an anticipated SAIF premium of $180,082. AGENDA ITEM # 3 - "1 FOR AGENDA OF July 26, 2005 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Approve Intergovernmental Agreement for membership in the Office of Consolidated Emergency Management OCEM in Washington Count PREPARED BY: Dennis Koellermeier DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the Council approve the proposed Intergovernmental Agreement with the Office of Consolidated Emergency Management (OCEM) in Washington County? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council approve and authorize the Intergovernmental Agreement. INFORMATION SUMMARY Tigard staff has been coordinating our emergency management program with this group for nearly .two .year's:.. Previously Tigard's emergency management program was lacking due to a lack of: staff time, and 'resources.-to,- dedicate to the program. Mike Lueck, Public Works' Program Assistant, currently pis ;'dedicated i:half time to. emergency management and has done an excellent job implementing Tigard's basic: emergency ..management program. Staff has concluded that a higher level of emergency planning, agency ,coordination- and ;training ~ is necessary for the times we are living in and more than the current half-time commitment we currently offer will provide.. Staff has discussed combining our efforts with that of the current members of OCEM to improve our programs. The OCEM members (Washington County, Hillsboro, Beaverton and TVF&R) have invited Tigard to join. The outcome of the membership will be the creation of a'seamless emergency management plan and service delivery system with the County, our neighboring cities, and our fire service provider. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Tigard's vision document has listed the following strategy, "Coordinate Tigard emergency response providers". This action directly applies to and helps implement that strategy. ATTACHMENT LIST Memo to Craig Prosser dated July 14, 2005, regarding OCEM membership Intergovernmental Agreement - Office of Consolidated Emergency Management in Washington County Attachment "A" to Intergovernmental Agreement FISCAL NOTES Tigard's costs are anticipated to be $36,100 for FY 05706. Staff anticipated this action and included funding for the annual cost of belonging to the OCEM in this year's budget plans. .'ri ~.'~'.:r.~l. i.~.~:~.., ~..a.. x,... t.a. j.I f .C r .:1~.. ~i 11 > .1 ....~G r.~Z.i% r tx r. .{.1 . r MEMORANDUM TO: Craig Prosser, Interium City Manager FROM: Dennis Koellermeier, Public Works Director RE; OCEM membership DATE: July 14, 2005 Craig, attached please find the proposed Intergovernmental Agreement for our membership'into the Office of Consolidated Emergency Management in Washington County (OCEM): As you are aware, we have been working for nearly two years coordinating our emergency management program with this group. Tigard's emergency management preparations had been lacking due to the lack of staff time and resources dedicated to the program. This was partially solved with the addition of Mike Lueck, a Public Works Program Assistant who is currently'dedicated'/z time to emergency management. Mike .has done a great job preparing Tigard for basic emergency management. However, due' to the times 'we find ourselves living in, we have concluded that Tigard needs to have a higher level of emergency planning, agency coordination and training than the current half-time commitment we can currently offer. To that end staff-has discussed combining our efforts with that of the current members of OCEM to improve our programs. The current members of OCEK Washington County, Hillsboro, Beaverton and TVF& R have invited Tigard to join. The outcome of our membership will be a seamless emergency management plan and service delivery system with the County, our neighboring cities, and our fire service. provider. Staff anticipated this action and included funding for the annual cost of belonging to OCEM. Our costs are anticipated to be $36,100 for FY05706. Per our meeting with the OCEM partners,- we need to submit this IGA to.the City Council for their consideration. Due to the loaded agendas at workshops this summer I would like to propose we distribute this memo and the IGA to Council via the Friday newsletter and add this to the July 26t~' Consent Agenda, unless we hear from Council they want to discuss it. I have attached the IGA and a Council Action Item Summary for your approval. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT OFFICE OF CONSOLIDATED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IN WASHINGTON COUNTY This Agreement is entered into, pursuant to ORS 190.010, by and among Washington County ("County"), the City of Beaverton ("Beaverton"), the City of Hillsboro ("Hillsboro"), the City of Tigard ("Tigard") and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, a rural fire protection district ("District"); (herein collectively "participating jurisdictions"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS the participating jurisdictions desire to consolidate their respective emergency management resources and form the Office of Consolidated Emergency Management ("OCEM"); and WHEREAS OCEM's, purpose is to improve the level of disaster and emergency preparedness within the boundaries of the participating jurisdictions; and WHEREAS improved preparedness will be achieved through increased coordination among the participating jurisdictions and among the various emergency service functions provided within those jurisdictions. TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. OFFICE OF CONSOLIDATED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT The participating jurisdictions hereby create an emergency management organization responsible for the coordination of emergency planning and service functions within the'jurisdictions of the participating entities and agree that the organization shall be known as THE OFFICE OF CONSOLIDATED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (OCEM). II. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT OCEM's purpose is to improve the level of disaster and emergency coordination and preparedness within the boundaries of the participating jurisdictions. III. OPERATING GUIDELINES A. Conformity to National Standards: The participating jurisdictions agree to adopt and implement the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and Incident Command System (ICS) as the incident management Page 1 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) organization for the OCEM which will interface with the activities of each emergency operations/coordination center. B. OCEM Workplan: The OCEM will develop, for Executive Committee consideration and adoption, an interim or start-up workplan and subsequent fiscal year workplans targeted at the fulfillment of the purpose of this Agreement. The current year workplan shall be incorporated as an attachment to this Agreement. C. Local Standards: The OCEM will work to develop minimum emergency management performance standards. Such minimum standards are identified in Attachment "A" to this Agreement and shall be considered in the development of the OCEM workplan as noted in subsection "B" of this section. D. Designation of Liaison: Each participating jurisdiction will designate liaisons from all of its respective departments who will be accountable for coordination and implementation of OCEM emergency planning initiatives. N. GOVERNANCE A. Executive Committee: The OCEM shall be governed by an Executive Committee consisting o£ 1) the Washington County Administrator; 2) the Washington County Sheriff; 3) the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Fire Chief; 4) the mayor of Beaverton; 5) the city manager of Hillsboro; 6) the city manager of Tigard: These primary representatives may designate an alternative representative who may attend Executive Committee meetings and deliberate and'vote in the absence of the participating jurisdiction's primary representative. Chair of the Executive Committee will be rotated among the participating jurisdictions on an annual basis. Any Executive Committee actions can only be taken if a majority of the Executive Committee members are present at Executive Committee meetings and all actions/decisions will be on a unanimous basis. The Executive Committee shall be responsible for: 1) Final approval of the Director of Consolidated Emergency Management (herein "Director") appointment and establishment of employment. terms and conditions, including the Director's job description,' duties, and compensation: The Executive Committee shall delegate immediate, day-to-day direction and control of the Director's work to a participating jurisdiction. For the initial term of this Agreement and until otherwise directed, the jurisdiction delegated this function shall be the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District; Page 2 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement-(OCEM) 2) Approval of the annual workplan for the OCEM including, but not limited to, all policies and procedures related to OCEM's functions; 3) Approval of the OCEM's annual budget and recommending same for approval by each participating jurisdiction;' and 4) Approval of allocation formulas for all non-personnel related direct and indirect costs of the OCEM's operations. B. Disputes: Any disputes as to the interpretation or operation of this Agreement between one or more of the participating jurisdictions must be resolved by a unanimous decision of the' Executive Committee. C. Administrative Support: Administrative support for Executive Committee meetings will be provided by the District. V. ORGANIZATION A. Director: The Director will serve at the pleasure of the District and be subject to the District's policies and procedures. The director's primary duties will be to: 1) develop and maintain an Emergency Management Program on behalf of the County and the other participating jurisdictions; 2) manage implementation of the workplan as outlined in section III B. above; 3) coordinate all emergency management activities within the participating jurisdictions; and 4) coordinate the emergency management activities of the participating jurisdictions with the State of Oregon and, with regional emergency management agencies. B. Staffin : Staff assigned to the OCEM pursuant to this Agreement will be housed at the District's office located at 20665 S.W. Blanton Street, Aloha, Oregon, or at such other location(s) agreed to by the Executive Committee. Staff located at the District will remain employees of their respective jurisdictions and subject to their respective personnel rules but will report to the OCEM Director. The participating jurisdictions agree to the following staff contributions to the OCEM and each agrees to bear all direct and indirect labor costs for the staff it contributes:, 1) Washington County will provide: a. One (1) Emergency Management Supervisor position, one (1) Emergency Management Coordinator position, and one .(1)'certified police officer whose primary responsibilities are to prepare an emergency management program for the, County organization. Page 3 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) b. One (1) Emergency Management Coordinator position whose primary duties are emergency management planning for the County's Department of Land Use and Transportation. C. One (1) Administrative Specialist (clerical) position to support the OCEM staff participating in the program 2) Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue will provide: a. One (1) Emergency Management Program Manager position whose primary responsibility is to prepare TVF&R's organization to respond in major emergencies and disasters. 3) The City of Beaverton will provide: a. One (1) Emergency Manager whose primary function is to ensure that the City is prepared for major emergencies and disasters. 4) The City of Hillsboro will provide: a. One (1) Emergency Manager whose primary function is to ensure that the City is prepared for major emergencies and disasters. 5) The City of Tigard will provide: a. One (1) halftime Emergency Program Manager whose responsibilities include ensuring that the City is prepared for major emergencies and disasters. VI. FUNDING The participating jurisdictions shall share equally in funding of the Director's salary and benefits pursuant to section IV A. (1) above. The participating jurisdictions shall also share in funding: a) necessary equipment for the Director pursuant to section VII below; b) the Director's materials and services costs; and c) other costs necessary to support OCEM operations. The percentage or share of the non-personnel related costs borne by each of the participating jurisdictions shall be as specified in the allocation mechanism to be approved by the Executive Committee in section IV A. (4) above. Payments from the participating jurisdictions to the District for the Director's salary, equipment, and materials and services as well as for the other costs necessary for OCEM operations will be on a Page 4 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) reimbursement basis at the end of each quarter of each year commencing with the execution date of this Agreement. VII. EQUIPMENT The'Executive Committee shall consider and adopt policies relating to: 1) standards and policies for required equipment as needed, and 2) ownership and maintenance responsibilities for equipment necessary for the operation of the OCEM. Pursuant to these policies, the Director of the OCEM shall determine what equipment will be necessary, to conduct the OCEM's 'functions and will make. equipment recommendations subject to this approval of the Executive . Committee. Subsequent to this approval, each participating jurisdiction shall' provide its staff with the equipment necessary to perform their duties under this Agreement. VIII... DURATION, WITHDRAWAL, AND,TERMINATION A. Term of Agreement: This Agreement will be in effect when it has been authorized by all of the governing bodies of the participating jurisdictions identified herein. The duration of this Agreement is from the date of execution for a period of two' (2) years. B. Agreement Renewal: This Agreement will automatically be.extended for ' two (2) year increments unless the.participating jurisdictions unanimously agree in writing to dissolve the OCEM. C. Withdrawal: A participating jurisdiction may provide written notice to all other"participating jurisdictions of its intent to withdraw no less than 180 days before July 1 of each year. A participating jurisdiction may also withdraw effective as of any other date provided that the withdrawing jurisdiction receives unanimous approval of the Executive Committee for withdrawal. D. Non-Appropriation: Notwithstanding any other provisions provided herein, a participating jurisdiction's continuation in the OCEM is subject to the jurisdiction's annual budget appropriation of funds in support of the OCEM. IX. AMENDMENTS Proposed amendments to this Agreement shall be approved by unanimous consent to the Executive Committee and must be subsequently approved by each of the participating jurisdiction's governing bodies. Page 5 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) X. ADDITIONAL JURISDICTIONS Any jurisdiction not a party to this'Agreement may become a party by first obtaining the unanimous approval of the Executive Committee and then securing approval of the terms in this Agreement and any accompanying amendments from its governing body.' XI. RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTS • Each of the participating jurisdictions shall be solely responsible for its own acts and the acts of its employees and officers under this Agreement. No participating jurisdiction shall be responsible or liable for consequential damages to any other participating jurisdiction arising out of the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. XII. INSURANCE Each of the participating jurisdictions shall contribute to the purchase and maintenance of such insurance as will protect the OCEM from claims of third parties arising from its performance under this Agreement. The amount of insurance shall be not less than the organization's liability under the Oregon Tort Claims Act. XIII. SEVERABILITY The terms of this Agreement are severable and a'determination by an appropriate body having jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Agreement that results in the invalidity of any part shall not affect the remainder of the Agreement. XIV. INTERPRETATION The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be liberally construed in accordance with the general purposes of this Agreement. SUBSCRIBED TO AND ENTERED INTO by the appropriate officer (s) who are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the governing body of the below- named unit of local government. DATED this day of )2005. L APPROVED AS TO FORM Chair, Board of Commissioners Washington County, Oregon Page 6 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) DATED this day of , 2005. Sheriff Washington County, Oregon DATED this day of , 2005. APPROVED AS TO FORM City of Beaverton 1 DATED this day of , 2005. APPROVED AS TO FORM Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue ' DATED this day of , 2005. APPROVED AS TO FORM City of Hillsboro _ Page 7 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) DATED this, day of 1 2005. APPROVED AS TO FORM City of Tigard Page 8 of 8 . Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) ATTACHMENT "A" Member jurisdictions;agree to work toward attaining minimum countywide emergency management performance standards, which include, but are not limited to: a. Develop and maintain a functional Emergency Operations Center (EOC); a functional EOC includes written position descriptions, trained emergency management staff, displays, communications equipment, etc. b. Emergency Operations Plan: A multi-hazard functional Emergency Operations Plan that is compatible with the state format. C. EOC Staff Training Sessions: Will assure a combination of training and exercises at least twice a year. d. Exercise Program: A demonstrated ability to exercise all elements of the emergency operations plan at all levels of government. e. Public Education Program: Provides information and programs on disaster preparedness for individuals, families, businesses, and industry. t Page I of 1 IGA (OCEM) Attachment'A" C:\DOCUME-l\twila.000\LOCALS-1\Temp\IGA Attachment.doc • 1 City Council Document Transmittal CITY OF TIGARD To: I'S OREGON From Date.: I'm sending you: ' Document Type: Rr IGA ❑ Contract ❑ Other Document Name: 04qF;c-e Ofi CvnsaZ(:) L; doG 6rj s Approved at the Council. Meeting of: ~7- ~l0•~5 Number Copies Included: 30(,)c)r ads 0 /your documents have been si ned b the Mayor ❑ Your document(s) have been signed.by the City Manager Ld'Your document(s) requires an additional signature(s)' eWhen all signatures have been•obtained, file an original document with City of Tigard Records ❑ Additional instructions: I:\ADM\FORMS\CITY COUNCIL DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL.40C 70c~~o Z~ , t~4n~ n INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT OFFICE OF CONSOLIDATED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IN WASHINGTON COUNTY This Agreement is entered into,.pursuant to ORS 190.010, by and among Washington County ("County"), the City of Beaverton ("Beaverton"),. the`City of . Hillsboro ("Hillsboro"), the City of Tigard ("Tigard") and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, a rural fire protection district ("District"); (herein collectively "participating jurisdictions. 7). WITNESSETH WHEREAS the participating jurisdictions desire to consolidate their respective emergency management resources and form'the Office of Consolidated Emergency Management ("OCEM"); and WHEREAS OCEM's purpose is to improve the level of disaster and emergency, preparedness within the boundaries of the participating jurisdictions; and WHEREAS improved preparedness will be achieved through increased coordination among the participating jurisdictions and among the various; emergency - service functions provided within those jurisdictions TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. OFFICE OF CONSOLIDATED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT The participating jurisdictions hereby create an emergency management organization responsible for the coordination of emergency planning and service functions within the jurisdictions of the participating entities and agree that the organization shall be known as THE OFFICE OF CONSOLIDATED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (OCEM). II. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT -OCEM's purpose is to improve the level of disaster and emergency coordination and preparedness within the boundaries of the participating jurisdictions. III. OPERATING GUIDELINES A. Conformity to National Standards: The participating jurisdictions agree to adopt and implement*the National Incident Management System (NIMS) • and Incident Command System (ICS) as, the incident management Page 1 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) organization for the OCEM which will interface with the activities of each emergency operations/coordination center. B. OCEM Workplan: The OCEM will develop, for Executive Committee- consideration and adoption, an interim or start-up workplan and subsequent fiscal year workplans targeted at the fulfillment of the purpose of this Agreement. The current year workplan shall be incorporated as an attachment to this Agreement. C. Local Standards: The OCEM will work to develop minimum emergency management performance standards. Such minimum standards are . identified in Attachment "A" to this Agreement and shall be considered in the development of the OCEM workplan as noted in subsection "B" of this section. D. Designation of Liaison: Each participating.jurisdiction will designate liaisons from all of its respective departments who will-be accountable for coordination and implementation.of OCEM emergency planning initiatives: IV. GOVERNANCE A. Executive Committee: The OCEM shall be governed, by an Executive 'Committee consisting o£ 1) the Washington County Administrator; 2) the Washington County Sheriff; 3) the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Fire, Chief; 4) the mayor of Beaverton; 5) the city manager of Hillsboro; 6) the city manager of Tigard. These primary representatives may designate an alternative representative who may attend Executive Committee meetings and deliberate and vote in the absence of the participating jurisdiction's primary representative. 'Chair of the Executive Committee will be rotated among the participating jurisdictions on an annual basis. Any Executive Committee actions can only be taken if a majority of the Executive Committee members are present at Executive Committee meetings and all actions/decisions will be on a unanimous basis. The Executive Committee shall be responsible for: 1) Final Approval of the Director of Consolidated Emergency Management (herein "Director") appointment and establishment of employment terms and conditions, including the Director's job description, duties, and compensation. The Executive Committee' shall delegate immediate, day-to-day direction and control of the Director's work to a participating jurisdiction. For the initial term of this Agreement and until otherwise directed, the jurisdiction' delegated this function shall be the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District; Page 2 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) 2) Approval of the annual workplan for the OCEM including, but not limited to, all policies and procedures related to OCEM's functions; 3) Approval of the OCEM's annual budget. and recommending same for approval by each participating jurisdiction; and 4) Approval of allocation formulas for all non-personnel related direct and indirect costs of the OCEM's operations. B.. Disputes: Any disputes as to the interpretation or operation of this Agreement between one or more of the participating jurisdictions must be resolved by a unanimous decision of the Executive Committee. C. Administrative Support: Administrative support for Executive Committee meetings will be provided by the District. . V. ORGANIZATION A. Director: The Director will serve at the pleasure of the District and be subject to theDistrict's'policies,and procedures. The director's primary duties will be to: 1) develop and maintain an Emergency Management Program on behalf of the County and the other participating jurisdictions; 2) manage implementation of the workplan as outlined *in section III B. above; 3) coordinate all emergency management activities within the participating jurisdictions; and 4) coordinate the emergency management activities of the participating jurisdictions with the State of Oregon and with regional emergency management agencies. B. Staffin ~ : Staff assigned to the OCEM pursuant to thi's Agreement will be housed at the District's office located at 20665.S.W. Blanton Street, Aloha, Oregon, or at such other location(s) agreed: to by the Executive , Committee. Staff located at the District will remain employees of their respective jurisdictions and subject to their respective personnel rules but will reportto the OCEM Director. The participating jurisdictions agree to. the following.staff contributions toothe OCEM and each agrees to bear all direct and indirect labor costs for the staff it contributes: l) Washington County will provide: a. . One (1) Emergency Management Supervisor position, one (1) Emergency Management Coordinator position, and one (1) certified police officer whose primary responsibilities are to prepare an emergency management program for the County organization. Page 3 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) b. One (1) Emergency Management Coordinator position whose primary duties are emergency management planning for the County's-Department of Land Use and Transportation. C. 'One (1) Administrative Specialist (clerical) position to support the OCEM staff participating in the program 2) Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue will provide: a. One'(1) Emergency Management Program Manager position whose primary responsibility is to prepare TVF&R's organization to respond in major emergencies and disasters. 3) The City of Beaverton will provide: a. One (1) Emergency Manager whose primary function is.to ensure that the City is prepared for major emergencies and disasters. 4) The City of Hillsboro will provide: a. One (1) Emergency Manager whose primary function is to ensure that the City is prepared for major emergencies, and disasters. .5) The Ci of Tigard will provide: a. One (1) halftime Emergency Program Manager whose responsibilities include ensuring that the City is prepared for major emergencies and disasters. VI. FUNDING The participating jurisdictions shall share equally in funding of the Director's salary and benefits pursuant to section IV A. (1) above. The participating jurisdictions shall also. share in funding: a) necessary equipment for the Director pursuant to section VII below; b) the Director's materials and services costs; and c) other costs necessary to support OCEM operations. The percentage or share of the non-personnel related costs borne by each of the participating jurisdictions shall be as specified in the allocation mechanism to be approved by the Executive Committee in section IV A. (4) above. Payments from the participating jurisdictions to the District for the Director's salary, equipment, and materials and services as well as for the other costs necessary for OCEM operations will be on a Page 4 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) reimbursement basis at the end of each quarter of each year commencing with the execution date of this Agreement. VII. EQUIPMENT The Executive Committee shall consider and adopt policies relating to: 1) standards and policies for required equipment as needed, and 2) ownership and maintenance responsibilities for equipment necessary for the operation of the OCEM. Pursuant to these policies, the Director of the OCEM shall determine what equipment will be necessary to conduct "the OCEM's functions and will make equipment recommendations/ subject to this approval of the Executive Committee. Subsequent to this approval, each participating jurisdiction shall provide its staff with the equipment necessary to. perform their duties under this Agreement. VIII. DURATION, WITHDRAWAL, AND TERMINATION A. Term of Agreement: This Agreement will be in effect when it has been authorized by all of the governing bodies of the participating jurisdictions identified herein. The duration of this Agreement is from the date of. execution for a period of two (2) years. B. Agreement Renewal: This Agreement will automatically be extended for two (2) year increments unless the participating jurisdictions unanimously agree in writing to dissolve the OCEM. C._ Withdrawal: A participating jurisdiction may provide written notice to all other participating jurisdictions of its intent to withdraw no less than 180 days before July 1 of each year. A participating jurisdiction may also withdraw effective as of any other date provided that the withdrawing jurisdiction receives unanimous approval of the Executive Committee for withdrawal. D. Non-Appropriation: Notwithstanding any other" provisions provided herein, a participating jurisdiction's continuation in the OCE M'; is subject to the jurisdiction's annual budget appropriation of funds in support of the OCEM. IX. AMENDMENTS Proposed amendments_to this Agreement shall be approved by unanimous consent to the Executive Committee and must be subsequently approved by each of the participating jurisdiction's governing bodies. Page 5 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) X. ADDITIONAL JURISDICTIONS Any jurisdiction not a party to this Agreement may become. 'a party by first obtaining the unanimous approval of the Executive Committee and then securing approval of the terms in this Agreement and any accompanying amendments from its governing body. XI. RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTS Each of the participating jurisdictions shall be solely responsible for its own acts and the acts of its employees and officers under this Agreement. No participating jurisdiction.shall be responsible or liable for consequential damages to any.other participating jurisdiction arising out of the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. XH. INSURANCE Each of the participating jurisdictions shall contribute to the purchase and maintenance of such insurance as will protect the OCEM from claims of third parties-arising from its performance under this Agreement. The amount of . insurance shall be not less than the organization's liability under the Oregon Tort Claims Act. XIII. SEVERABILITY The terms of this Agreement are severable and a determination by an appropriate body having jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Agreement that results in the invalidity of any part shall not affect the remainder of the Agreement. XIV. INTERPRETATION The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be liberally construed in accordance with the general purposes of this Agreement. SUBSCRIBED TO AND ENTERED INTO by the appropriate officer (s) who are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the governing body of the below- named unit of local government. DATED this day 'of . , 2005. APPROVED AS TO FORM Chair, Board of Commissioners Washington County, Oregon Page 6 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) DATED this day of , 2005. Sheriff Washington.County, Oregon DATED'this 'day of , 2005. APPROVED AS TO FORM City of Beaverton DATED this day of .2005..: APPROVED AS TO FORM Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue DATED this day of , 2005. APPROVED AS TO FORM City of Hillsboro - Page 7 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) DATED this l1~ day of , 2005. APPROVED AS TO FORM City of igard Page,8 of 8 Intergovernmental Agreement (OCEM) P' ATTACHMENT "A" Member jurisdictions agree to work toward attaining minimum countywide emergency management performance standards, which include, but are not limited to: a. Develop and maintain a functional Emergency Operations Center (EOC); a functional EOC includes written position descriptions, trained. ' emergency management staff, displays, communications equipment,. etc. b. Emergency Operations Plan: A multi-hazard functional Emergency r Operations Plan that is compatible with the state format. C. EOC Staff Training Sessions: Will assure a combination of training and exercises at-lea 't twice a year. d: Exercise Program: A demonstrated ability to exercise all elements of the emergency operations plan at all levels of government. e. Public Education Program: Provides information and programs on disaster preparedness for individuals, families, businesses, and industry. Page 1 of 1 IGA (OCEM) Attachment 'A" C:\DOCUME-1\twila.000.\LOCALS-1\Temp\IGA Attachment.doc ate. Jul, Z6' 2005 D N'ip` %TEM No• 4 aGE ►NG EAR P IA ~ 0M NSI (QY ItAQ EST, T . ET uncil one fore Ow Co . S IGS-k3p" to testify be in9 Pa9ets) if You Wis ~ow s►9n.~n the fo1 please ue~zc Uga PIE 10tAA. S-1 PP-TISf- PPEP'L. Ca~~ : 0F p. FIR. IGAR A H T NSIQ.IFOP RC " .E rate °f C"P S ando ral subject tO r.tt P en eeting laws. ll W ~ublic m A City of Tigard and records and is openly dresses This is a ublic meeting a public record names and u lic meetings pre~6n,s p of th The stun°ny beCOmembers of thticipate in City °N s a public reCOrd• to to all m or P4 P whic wh° attend eetrnJ minutes= available . persons " of ' . ~nr. be included in the m ill Constraints. Due to Time irnpose ounell May • moray ~est~ A lime \CCSIGNUP\PH TESTIMGNY QJ.DGG D~11\GREER . L'A ublic e state of Ctreg°arts of the public iTEVA No.. ect to th become Pa, and AGE~~A eeting~ subj onY names ublic m and Oralo f the Public. ,The ublic meetings of Tig ard p All written be and p s laws' em of Tecord. This, is a ,and City record to all . members ate. in public r ` m ,record ing an enly a~aila alt tend or partwhi is a d is op who in minutes; ses of p which g ern the meet Neutral addres . e included SE PRINT phone N° will b PLEA A amst) . Address & S eakin Name, O .anent - & phone Na • eav'M In Favor Name AddCes/✓ ~r pro onent - S & phone No e Address Na►~' , 00 hone No v4ame,'Address & p phone"N° ) i Name Address 6t/►ti~ & phone Name Address & phone No. 1. . • ~ (v3 ,Name Address 3 & phone No. Address Name, ,~j & phone No. 6(& t F V-2 Name Address y 93 . 4115 J . _Iz-4 No C°g'4-'~``~ ame Address & Phone N & phone No. e Address 1~R Nam , Se~nl!t~ Ye ess & phone No.'s fh Name' Addr 11I 1 1~. mod, 9 aa~ 1 ' cf . p hone No l0 b G(- L~L7 3 Name, Address & P 3 e 140, Address & Phon Name ress & phone Na Name, Add 917 AGENDA ITEM No.-4, This is a City. of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony, become part of thepublic record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. PLEASE PRINT Prop' onent S eakin - In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) Neutral Name, Address & Phone No. Name, AddressA Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. 60 1. a 0. 1a09 Yk 03 to3~t 9 SQ Name, Address & Phone No. - Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. 0(2-q-7 1ctb Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. A d~V ~ S rYl I'~-~} L- A 6~ s w HRm'cOM Name; Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.. Name, Address & Phone No. J~ Y►'l W I' LS` ®lJ ewe Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No.' Name, Address & Phone No. /d S~l~ sw L C)4Q L.A1 ~~zz3 770 CV- AGENDA ITEM No. 4 This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. Al/written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. PLEASE PRINT- Proponent - (Speaking In Favor Opponent - (Speaking Against) Neutral Name, Address & Phone No.' Name, Address & Phone No. Name,'Address & Phone No. . C,►u,,~~-i-..~.. ~o..t~~ ~~Zzv Name, Addre Pi hone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. - 1 cos 5~ G,_,A A ASS Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. 'Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & PhoneNo. Agenda Item No. Meeting of tutu ato . do05. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 26, 2005 CONTINUATION, OF PUBLIC HEARING ((QUASI- JUDICIAL). - APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION The public hearing before the Tigard City Council for this agenda item was opened on July 12, 2005, and continued to the July 26, 2005, Tigard City Council meeting: The packet materials prepared'for the July 12 meeting should be moved forward to the July 26, 2005, Council meeting, packet. The following information is added to the packet materials for this item: C~ June 27; 2005, memorandum from Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner to Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director regarding the Appeal of CUP 2004-00005, Tigard First Baptist Church. W June 24, 2005, letter from David B. Smith, Attorney regarding Appeal of Hearings Officer's Decision, First Baptist Church of Tigard, Inc., File Nos. CUP 2004-00005, SLR 2005-00005, SLR. 2005-0ooo6, VAR 2005-00o16, Qur File No. 0514. This letter included an attachment: ;Appellant's Motion for Continuance and Extension of 120-Day Rule Period. iAadrnVacket'05%050726Urst baptist church hearing -cover sheet for packet materials.doc MEWO RAN"D:UM TO: Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director FROM: Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner!? RE:. Appeal of CUP 2004-00005, Tigard First Baptist Church DATE: June 27, 2005 This matter was originally scheduled, and has already been advertised for public hearing before the City Council on July 12., 2005. We received a letter today (attached) from the appellant's counsel, requesting'that.additionai time be.provided'in order to prepare a legal memorandum-an6supporting evidence and exhibits. The appellant has'requested that the hearing be continued.,to the July 26,'2005 fiearing, date, and has provided a corresponding 14 day extension. to, the 120-day rule.period which will now conclude on :August 17, 2005. Since'the hearing'.-has already been advertised, staff. recommends'that the Council open the matter and continue to, the July.2e Hearing Date, prior to receiving staff summary and public testimony, This will afford those in attendance with proper notification of the continued hearing date. Administration staff will need to ensure that there is adequate time available on the July 2e Hearing to accommodate this request. . enci DAVID B. SMITH' ATTORNEY AT LAW 6950 S.W. Hampton Street;.Suite 232 RECEIVED PLANNING` Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)624-9352 Fax (503)598-3028 SUN 2 7 2005 CITY OF TIGARD June 24, 2005 Ms Morgan Tracy, Staff Planner, City of Tigard .13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Appeal of Heari'ncis Officer's Deci si,on . First Baptist Church 'of Tigard. File Nos. CUP 2004-00005.''SLR,2005=00005 SLR 2005-00006. VAR 2005.-00016. Our File No. 0514 Dear Ms Tracy: Enclosed for filing please find the original. of the Motion' for. Continuance and Extension of 120-Day Rule Period of.the Appellant, First Baptist Church.of Tigard -in the above=referenced matter.' P1 ease advise me as soon 'as the appeal. hearing before the City Coun'c'il has been rescheduled. Iintend to file a legal memorandum with the' City in. support of.- this -appeal together with new evidence at -exhi bi is ,thereto; - at least 7 days prior-to the date of the hearing:' Please call me if 'you have'questions. Very truly yours, David B. Smith Attorney for First Baptist Church of.Tigard encl. cc: Mr. Jim Wilson, First Baptist Church of Tigard, Mr.,•Tim Ramis, Esq., City.'Attorney. 0514=006.TRN BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD CITY,COUNCIL In the Matter of the Appeal ) of ,the Decision of the ) Hearings Officer in CUP ) Appellant's.Motion for 2004-00005, SLR 2005-00005 - ) Continuance and Extension 00006, VAR 2005-00016; ) of 120=Day Rule Period First Baptist Church of ) Tigard,. Applicant. ) Applicant (and Appellant-).First Baptist Church of Tigard ' hereby moves the City. Council for entry of an, order continuing the public hearing in the above-captioned,matter for 14* days from July 12, 2005 to July 26,' 2005. This`motionJs made pursuant to TDC,§ 18.390.F. This motion is made to afford the,applicant an'opportunity to gather- additional evidence regarding traffic safety,. and to enable applicant's counsel to be present at the hearing. App'l i cant's counsel wi'l l be out-of town at another publ i.c hearing on July 12. This -is the first continuance or extension of time requested by the applicant:., Applicant waives appearance and presentation at the July 12,hearing,..and will make a complete presentation at, the 'continued hearing on'. July .26, .2005. The Hearings Officer's Notice of Final Order of May 12, 2005 indicates .the 120-day.rule period will. be exhausted on August.3 , 2005. Pursuant to ORS 227.178(4), the applicant requests the 1207day rule period'be extended for another 14 days to August 17, Page 1 - APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE AND 120 DAY EXTENSION 2005.,. DATED this 24th day of June, 2005. Respectfully-submitted, David -8 : • Smith 6950 SW Hampton Street Suite 232 Tigard., OR 97223-8331: (503) 624-9352 First Attorney for, Appl i cant; ' Baptist.'Church of Tigard 0514-005.MTN Page 2 - APPELLANT"S MOTION FOR-CONTINUANCE ANDa120 DAY EXTENSION : , - ' AGENDA ITEM # I FOR AGENDA OF CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON a.(v" ao05 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY IS TITLE Appeal of Conditional Use Permit for the Tigard First Baptist Church Expansion PREPARED BY: Morgan Tracy DEPT HEAD OK, ITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL This matter is being brought to City Council as the result of an appeal of a Type III Hearings Officer's decision approving the Tigard First Baptist Church Expansion. 'The Council will need to consider the merits of the appeal based on the applicable laws and decide whether to deny the appeal and uphold the Hearings Officer's. decision or grant the appeal and modify the decision. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the appeal be denied as-there is no mechanism in the code to permit the requested adjustment for a driveway on SW Gaarde. Granting the adjustment would violate the development code criteria. INFORMATION SUMMARY On April 251h, 2005 the Tigard Hearings Officer held a public hearing to consider an application for conditional use approval to construct a 22,500 square foot expansion of the existing church and associated parking in three phases. As part of Phase 2, the applicant proposed to relocate the existing driveway on SW Gaarde Street, designated as an arterial street in the City's Transportation System Plan. The access standards of the Development Code require that the spacing of streets and driveways along arterial streets maintain a minimum 600-foot separation (TCDC 18.705.030.H.3). The applicant has requested an'adjustment to the street and driveway spacing requirements. The current driveway is approximately 80 feet from the intersection of SW 110th Avenue and SW Gaarde Street. The proposed access would be 200 feet from this intersection.. Even though the proposed driveway distance from the intersection is greater than the current situation, the spacing still falls short of the 600 foot standard specified in the code. The plan includes two other proposed accesses on SW 1101h Avenue, which will comply with and satisfy the access provisions of the code. In the initial pre-application conference prior to the applicant's land use application, staff expressed, reservations about the proposed access on Gaarde Street, and recommended against proposing such an access. The applicant had the opportunity to consider the City's position and develop an alternative site plan design that would not result in a lengthy dead-end parking aisle.- Nevertheless, the applicant has proposed that an access to Gaarde Street be allowed, and applied for an adjustment to the driveway spacing standard. In the staff report to the Hearings Officer, staff provides an analysis of the requested adjustment related to the specific criteria of Section 18.370.020.C.5. on page 14. That analysis shows that contrary to the applicant's request, four of the six review criteria for the adjustment could not be met. During the hearing, the applicant's traffic engineer testified that closure of the Gaarde Street driveway will cause "[a]dditional impacts to the [110th Avenue/Gaarde Street] intersection and 110th Avenue... longer delays in accessing the site... emergency vehicles will need to undertake a longer route... [and] the residential neighborhood ...will experience additional traffic circulation and impacts." While additional impacts to the intersection may result in terms of moderate increased waiting times, the purpose of the access spacing standard is to provide an increased measure of safety along the city's more traveled routes by reducing, through consolidation, the number of turning movements and conflicts. The Hearings Officer asked staff about providing secondary emergency access for the approximate 700-foot long dead-end parking lane. Emergency access, that is restricted from general public use, is not subject to the access spacing limitations due to its infrequent use and heightened awareness of drivers when emergency vehicles are responding. Therefore, staff was amenable to modifying the condition related to this access to specifically allow restricted emergency access. The Hearings Officer noted this in his decision, "Therefore the Hearings Officer finds that the applicant should be required to provide an emergency vehicle access to Gaarde Street if required by the Tualatin. Valley Fire District. A condition of approval is warranted to that effect;"' however, that condition was omitted from his final order, in an apparent oversight on the Hearings Officer's part. To correct this, staff recommends that condition #30 be modified. From: 30. The existing driveway on Gaarde shall be removed prior to final inspection on Phase-l. To: 30.. The existing driveway on Gaarde shall be removed prior to final inspection on Phase 1. A restricted emergency access from SW Gaarde Street to the lower parking area shall be constructed if required by Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue. Appropriate measures (e.g. knox box locked gate) shall be incorporated to prevent general public use of this access. The appellant's representative contends that the Hearings Officer misconstrued the applicable law. More specifically, he notes that the Hearings Officer's decision failed to balance the approval criteria, but in fact there is no obligation or,authority to do so. In order to grant the requested adjustment, all the applicable criteria must be satisfied, not just some. On that basis, the decision making authority need only look at the criterion "There are no alternative' access points on the street in question or from another street "[emphasis added] to determine that the adjustment cannot be granted. Whether the remaining criteria are met or not is immaterial. The appellant's representative continues by noting that "subsection b(5) requires the approved access (110th Avenue, only) to be safe". In fact, this standard refers to the access that would be approved through the adjustment process, not to the access that is allowed without an adjustment. In other words, it wouldn't make sense to require a conforming access (in this case the two on SW 110th) to meet adjustment criteria established for accesses that don't comply with code standards. The issue of safety related to these access points is the sight distance at the intersection of 110th and Gaarde. Since the applicant failed to provide this sight distance evaluation with the application materials, staff was unable to determine whether adequate sight distance existed, and hence the condition was imposed. Staff believes that it is feasible to obtain adequate sight distance, though some improvements may be required to attain this. If sight distance cannot be achieved, then the development should not be allowed to proceed, and that is why the condition (#13) was made a part of tasks to occur prior to commencing any on site improvements. However, intersection sight distance should not be confused with access spacing and access safety. CUP2004-00005, Page 8 of the Hearing's Officers' Final Order. Staff understands the applicant would like to have an access on SW Gaarde as this would. facilitate movement on and through the applicant's site; however, it is the responsibility of the City to ensure that the overall public is not detrimentally impacted by development. The adjustment process provides applicant a means to utilize his property if no other alternatives exist and it can be shown that the result will not negatively impact safety, but when an, alternative exists, as is the case here, the Hearings Officer acted appropriately to deny the request. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Uphold the appeal in full, deny the appeal in full, or modify the decision accordingly. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY None applicable to this appeal. ATTACHMENT LIST 1. "Draft" City Council Resolution. Exhibit A - Hearings Officer Final Order Including the Staff Report. Exhibit B - Staff's recommended amendment to Condition # 30 2. Appeal Filing Form 3. Letter from Tigard First Baptist Church dated'May 9, 2005 with Attachment from TVF&R 4. Closing Arguments 5. Exhibits Received at the 4/25/05 Public Hearing 6. Agencies and Staff Comments 7. The Applicant's Application Materials. FISCAL NOTES Appeal fees have been paid by the'appellant. y CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO.05- A RESOLUTION AND FINAL ORDER APPROVING THE TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2004-00005/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2005- 00005/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2005-00006 AND DENYING ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2005-00016, ADOPTING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS. WHEREAS, the Tigard's Hearings Officer reviewed this case at a public hearing at his meeting of April 25, 2005; and 'WHEREAS, the Hearings Officer adopted findings approving the requested conditional use permit and sensitive lands permits,, subject to,additional conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the Hearings 'Officer adopted findings denying the requested adjustment to access spacing standards; and WHEREAS, an appeal was filed on May 25, 2005 by the owner and applicant, on the basis that the Hearings Officer misconstrued the applicable law; an d WHEREAS; the City Council held a public hearing on the appeal of the approval on July 12, 2005; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the testimony, submittals, and staff report on July 12, 2005, and reviewed findings and. conditions. of approval that were contained within the Hearings Officer's final order; and WHEREAS, the City Council agreed that Condition #30 should be modified as described in the Agenda Item Summary and shown in Exhibit B, to require an emergency access to SW Gaarde if deemed necessary by TVFR; and WHEREAS, the City Council concluded that the appeal failed to demonstrate that errors in the Hearings Officer's decision occurred and that the appellants requested adjustment to the access spacing requirement to allow a general public use access was not supported by substantial evidence in the record; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City'Council that: SECTION. 1: The Tigard City Council approves applications ' CUP2004-00005/SLR2005- 00005/SLR2005-00006 and denies VAR2005-00016 - First Baptist Church of Tigard, subject to the conditions of approval stated in the Hearings Officer's final order dated May 12; 2005, attached hereto as Exhibit A and. incorporated-herein by this reference, with the exception of. the changes to Condition #30, attached hereto as Exhibit B, to' reflect the requirement for an emergency only access to be provided on SW Gaarde. RESOLUTION NO. 05 - Page 1 taff Report and findings - and analysis stated in the c rated herein The Tigard City Council adopts the Attachment 3'and and. ?T ed in the SECTION 2: er adopts the modifications as propos Hearings Offlcer's.Final Orde r, ttad'hereto as by this reference. The Council Item Summary. ached Agenda att This resolution is effective -immediately upon passage Thi . SECTION 3: 2005. day of PASSED: This Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder =City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 05 - Page 2 i EXHIBIT A 120 DAYS = 8/3/2005 (Includes a 7-day extension) CITY GF TIGARD DATE OF FILING: 5/ 12/2005 Community DeveCopment SFuiping A Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Numbers: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 2004-00005 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR 2005-00005 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR 2005.00006 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT VAR 2005-00016 Case Name: FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD Name of Owner: The First Baptist. Church of Tigard Name of Applicant: Architect LA Attn:. Larry Abell Address of Applicant: 805 SE Sherman Street Portland OR 97214 Address of Property: 11075 SW Gaarde Street Ti and OR 97223 Tax Ma /Lot Nos.: Washington Co. Tax Assessor's Ma No. 2S103DC, Tax Lot 100 A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND TWO SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEWS. AND DENYING THE REQUEST FOR AN ADJUSTMENT. THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANTS PLANS, NARRATIVE; MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES,. THE PLANNING DIVISIONS STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED 'IN FURTHER DETAIL IN. THE STAFF REPORT., THE HEARINGS OFFICER HELD .A PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 25, 2005 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION,HAS BEEN BASED ONJHE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request:' > The applicant is seeking Conditional Use. Permit approval for a, three-phased expansion. Phase 1 consists of new on site parking for 134 cars. No new access to SW Gaarde Street is proposed with this phase,, but Sensitive Lands Reviews are required for the drainageway and step slopes present on site. Phase 2 consists of a new two-story 18,000 square foot multi purpose gymnasium building. With this phase, the 2,300 square foot "Bolt Hall" will be demolished and replaced by. an additional 47 parking spaces. Phase 3 consists•of a new two-story 4,450 square foot addition between the existing church and ministry . buildings. This phase will also reconfigure the existing parking lot to provideaccess to the new addition, closing the existing access on Gaarde Street, and constructing a new access from Gaarde Street to the new parking lot in Phase 1. An Adjustment to the 600-foot access spacing standards, is also required. At the close of the record, the Hearings Officer held the record open for one week then approved the Conditional Use Permit and Sensitive Lands Reviews, subject to the conditions of approval within this final order; and denied the Adjustment request finding. that the applicant failed to- bear the burden of proof that the Adjustment complies with the applicable approval criteria. Zone: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. Abolicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Action: ➢ 0 Approval as Requested 19 Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: - 2 Owners of Record Within the Required Distance 19 Affected Government Agencies 0 Interested Parties 19 The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard City,Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 12, 2005 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY27, 2005 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. i_.J Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section' 18.390.040.G. 1. may appeal this decision' in accordance 'with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the, Tigard Community Development Code which provides'that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the .decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON MAY 26, 2005. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. ~ I BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY 'OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Larry Abel on behalf of the) FINAL • O R D E, R Tigard First Baptist Church for a conditional. use permit) , and other approvals to expand an existing church at ) CUP 2004-000051 1.1075 SW Gaarde Street in.the City of Tigard, Oregon) (Tigard First Baptist Church) A. SUMMARY 1. The applicant, Tigard First Baptist Church represented by Larry Abel, requests approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for expansion of an existing church, located at 11075 SW Gaarde Street; also known as tax lot 01100, WCTM 2S103DC. The site is the southwest quadrant of the intersection of SW 110t` Avenue and Gaarde Street. The site is zoned R-3.5 (Low Density Residential). The site is currently developed with a roughly 6630 square foot church, 3564 square foot ministry building and a 2300 square foot "Bolt Hall," 134 automobile parking spaces and landscaping. The applicant requests sensitive lands reviews for impacts to the,drainageway and steep slopes on site. , SLR2005-00005 and SLR2005-00006. The applicant proposes to construct a 22,500 square foot expansion of the existing church-and associated parking in three phases. a, .In Phase l the applicant proposed to construct a new 134-spa6e parking lot in the east and south portions of the site,.including a new.access to SW 110x` Avenue. " b. In Phase 2 the applicant proposed to construct anew 4450 square foot two-story, addition between the existing-church and ministry buildings, replacing a portion of the existing parking lot, reconfigure the existing parking lot to provide access to the new addition and relocate the existing driveway on Gaarde Street to the south. ' c. In Phase 3 the applicant proposed to demolish "Bolt Hall" and construct a new 18,000 square foot two-story,multi purpose gymnasium-building southeast of the Phase 2 addition. The applicant will also construct an additional 47 parking spaces near the center of the site. 2: The applicant also requests an adjustment to reduce the 600-foot intersection spacing requirements on Gaarde Street to 130 feet to relocate an existing driveway. VAR2005-00016. 3. City Hearings Officer Joe Turner (the "hearings officer") held a duly noticed ' public hearing regarding the application. City, staff recommended that the hearings officer approve the CUP and Sensitive-Lands Reviews, subject to conditions. Staff recommended the hearings officer deny the adjustment request. See the•Staff Report tollie Hearings Officer dated April 18, 2005 (the "Staff Report"). The applicant's representative accepted the findings and conditions of approvals recommended by City staff with certain 1 This decision also addresses SLR2005-0006,, SLR2005-00006 acid VAR2005-00016: exception. One person testified orally and in writing in support of the application. Two other persons testified orally with questions and concerns. The hearings. officer held open the public record for one week to allow the applicant to submit a final argument. The principal disputed issues in this case include the following: a. Whether the proposed development will generate excessive noise, lights, pollution and other impacts on abutting residential properties that cannot be adequately . mitigated; b. Whether the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the proposed adjustment to the intersection spacing requirements complies with the applicable approval . criteria in TDC 18370.020.C(5)(b); and c. Whether the applicant can be required to ensure that adequate sight distance is available at the intersection of 110th Avenue and Gaarde Street. 4. In this final order, the hearings officer approves the conditional use permit and sensitive lands review based on the findings and conclusions provided and incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order. The hearings officer denies the adjustment. B. HEARING AND RECORD HIGHLIGHTS 1. The hearings officer received testimony at .the public hearing about this. application on. April•25, 2005. All exhibits and records of testimony are filed with the Tigard Department of Community Development: At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts,'bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected testimony offered at the public hearing in this matter. 2. City planner Morgan Tracy summarized the Staff Report. a.. He noted that the applicant's narrative is inconsistent with the development and tree removal plans regarding which trees will be removed and retained. Condition of approval 4 require that the applicant submit a revised tree removal plan that clearly identifies which trees will be removed and retained. He noted that the applicant will plant-additional trees and shrubs on the site, including 10 douglas fir trees within the stream buffer, which will enhance the existing stream buffer and mitigate impacts on. abutting residents to the south. b. He noted. that there is an existing bike/pedestrian path easement on the southern portion of the site. The proposed development encroaches into a portion of the path: The, applicant has proposedto dedicate a blanket pathway easement over the entire sensitive area to compensate for impacts to. the existing path easement. However construction of,a path within the sensitive area will impose additional costs on the City. Therefore •the ,applicant should be required to retain the existing easement or obtain any required approvals and construct the portion of the pathway in the realigned easement. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) page 2 c. He testified that theapplicant did submit a lighting plan for the site. However staff have not had an opportunity to review the plan in detail: Therefore he requested the hearings officer retain condition of approval 3. d. He testified that the proposed development does not provide enough off- street parking to comply with the Code. The applicant is required to provide 185 parking spaces and 6 ADA accessible spaces. The applicant should be required to demonstrate that adequate parking, including. ADA accessible spaces, is available to accommodate each phase of the proposed development. This is required by condition 2.D. e. He recommended the hearings officer deny the proposed adjustment to the intersection spacing requirements. He argued that adequate alternative access points available on 110 . Avenue. Therefore the adjustment request does not comply with TDC• 18.370.020.C(5)(b)(2). f. He testified that the applicant is not required to provide a separate drainage tract. g. He argued that the applicant should be requjred to demonstrate that adequate sight distance is available at the intersection of 110. Avenue and Gaarde Street: Proportionality is irrelevant to this safety. issue. h. He requested that the hearings officer allow emergency vehicle access to " Gaarde Street if required by the Tualatin Valley Fire District.' 3. Architect Larry Abel, civil engineer Carl Jensen, traffic engineer Frank Charbonneau and project manager Jim Wilson testified for the applicant.' a. Mr. Abel submitted -a revised site.plan dated April 25, 2005; with revised phasing. The applicant reversed proposed phases 2 and 3 to allow the applicant to ' construct the gymnasium first, as Phase 2. He accepted the findings and conditions of approval in the Staff Report with certain exceptions. i. He testified that the applicant will retain, the existing trail easement on the site. The applicant will revise the design of the'lower parking lot to avoid . , impacts to the easement. ii. He testified that the applicant will design the parking lots to ensure that a sufficient number of off-street parking spaces are available to serve. the development proposed in each individual phase. iii. He testified that the applicant will'try to save as many. existing trees on the site as possible. The applicant's engineer will review the design and location of the existing sanitary sewer hiie,during finat engineering to determine if it can accommodate the proposed expansion. However the applicant may need to lower the sewer line to serve the proposed development, which could impact trees within the sensitive area. The applicant will not remove trees or other vegetation within the stream buffer unless it is absolutely necessary. The applicant will also save as many trees as possible on the upland portion.of the site. The applicant will plant additional trees throughout the site. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 3 iv. He requested the hearings officer approve the adjustment to' allow the applicant to maintain direct driveway access to Gaarde Street. The Gaarde Street driveway allows traffic generated' by the church.to disperse onto area streets, reducing the traffic impact on 110th Avenue and the adjacent residential neighborhood. The applicant will relocate the existing driveway to the south to improve the intersection, spacing on this street. The site does not have enough frontage on Gaarde Street to comply . with the 600-foot spacing requirement. The church generates traffic on Sunday mornings. It does not generate traffic during normal peak hours. v. He requested that the hearings officer modify conditions of approval 13 and 29 to limit the applicant's duty to improve sight distance at the intersection of 110th Avenue and Gaarde Street to removal of obstructions on the site or within the public right of way. The applicant has no control over the properties north of the intersection and has no right to remove, vegetation or structures on private property that may limit sight distance at this intersection. vi. He testified that the applicant will treat and detain stormwater within a portion of the site.. The applicant will not create a separate tract for the drainage facilities. He requested the hearings officer modify conditions 17 and 21 to that effect. b.-Mr. Jensen testified that there is a question about the depth of the existing sanitary sewer line on the site. The applicant may need to lower the sewer line to serve the proposed expansion, which may impact trees within the sensitive area. The applicant will restore the disturbed area and mitigate any impacts by planting additional vegetation on the site. i. He testified that the applicant will collect stormwater runoff from impervious areas on the site, treat it M -a bio-filtration swale to remove pollutants and discharge it onto the ground outside of the stream buffer, allowing the treated runoff to flow overland to the creek. ii. He testified that the applicant will plant additional landscaping throughout the site to provide a buffer between the site and adjacent homes. The, applicant will replace all of the existing parking lot lights with cut-off fixtures, which limit.off--site glare. c. Mr. Charbonneau testified that'all.affected intersections, including the proposed Gaarde Street driveway, will continue to operate at Level Of Service ('LOS") B . or C with the proposed expansion. Sight distance is more than adequate, based on the 35 mph speed limit on Gaarde. i. He testified that the Gaarde Street driveway will improve circulation and emergency, access on the. site. Elimination of the Gaarde Street driveway will create a roughly 700-foot long dead-end. Eliminating the Gaarde Street driveway will . increase the traffic impact on the 110th Avenue/Gaarde Street intersection and the abutting neighborhood, because all•of the traffic from the site will exit onto 110th Avenue. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) page 4 d.' Mr. Wilson testified that the applicant will not operate a school on the site. He testified that improvements to Gaarde Street made the existing: Gaarde Street driveway unusable by emergency vehicles. The City proposed to "work-with" the applicant to. fix the problem when they developed the expansion. Now the City is denying any access to Gaarde Street. 4. Bruce Anderson testified in support of the applications. He argued that the applicant should be allowed to provide driveway access to Gaarde *Street. 5. Julie Piesker expressed concern.that closure of the Gaarde Street access will increase. traffic volume and congestion on 110'h Avenue. She noted that the 1101h Avenue/Gaarde Street intersection is not signalized. She argued that the. applicant could limit use of the Gaarde Street driveway to Sunday only. '6. Greg Herkner expressed concern that expansion of the parking lot will increase _ the amount of pollution entering the creek near the south boundary of the site. He objected to removal of the existing trees on the site. The trees buffer his home from lights, noise and other impacts generated on the'site. .7. City engineer Kim McMillan testified that Gaarde Street is an arterial. The City, requires a minimum 600 feet between intersections on arterials to avoid conflicting turn movements and to maintain traffic flow. Arterials are intended to carry through traffic at higher speeds. Additional access points conflict with that purpose and may create a hazard. The applicant has, or will have, two driveways onto 1.10 ' Avenue, which are adequate to serve the use. Although closure of the Gaarde Street driveway will increase traffic on I IOth Avenue, traffic is generally limited to Sunday mornings, The City considered allowing a right-in/right-out only-access onto Gaarde. However a median - would conflict with the driveway serving the development across the street. In addition, such a driveway would still require an adjustment for which the applicant cannot meet the, approval criteria. She testified that the City is required to restore. existing driveways when it constructs street improvements. However the City can require closure -of existing driveways as a condition of approval for new development. 8. City Planning Manager Dick Bewersdorff testified that City 'capital improvement. staff failed to check with City engineering staff before they agreed to work with the applicant to relocate the existing Gaarde Street driveway. The Code does not allow the proposed Gaarde Street access and capital improvement staff have no authority to allow such access. 9. At the end of the hearing, the hearings officer ordered the public record held open for one week for the applicant to submit a closing argument. The record in this case closed at 5 PM on May 2, 2005.. C. DISCUSSION .1.. City staff provided basic facts about the site and. its vicinity and existing and proposed uses in the Staff Report. Ultimately they recommended that the hearings officer CUP 2004-00005. _ Hearings Officer Final Order Mgard'First Baptist Church) Page 5 Approve the applications for the conditional use permit and sensitive lands reviews and deny the adjustment application. The applicant accepted most of the findings and recommended conditions with the exceptions described more below. The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report as his own except to the extent they are inconsistent with the findings and discussion in this final order. .2. Regarding the conditional use permit, substantial evidence in the record shows that the proposed use.does or can comply with the applicable standards for a conditional use permit. That evidence and those findings were not rebutted. The hearings officer relies on the Staff Report for relevant findings and citation to 'supporting evidence on these issues. The hearings officer is persuaded that the proposed use will not generate excessive noise, lights, pollution and other effects that cannot be adequately mitigated. These impacts can be accommodated considering the size, shape, location, topography and natural features of the site. ' a. Parking, maneuvering and .other activities. occurring within the parking lot will generate some noise. However such impacts are short term, as vehicles enter and leave the site. In addition, the parking lot will be physically separated from abutting. residential properties by the existing vegetative buffer, along. the stream. The applicant will plant additional vegetation within the buffer and throughout the site, which will enhance the existing buffer. See Plan Sheet L l. Therefore the hearings officer finds that activities in the parking lot are unlikely to have a significant adverse impact on surrounding residents. b. The hearings officer finds that lights in the parking lot are unlikely to cause glare or adverse visual impacts off-site, because of the distance and vegetation between the light fixtures and residences. Excessive lighting can be addressed by conditions of approval that limit the level of lighting at the property line and require light fixtures to be designed, situated and/or supplemented so they do not cast significant off- sight glare. Also conditions can provide that lights not required for security purposes should be turned off when there are no scheduled'activities at the temple. A condition of approval is warranted requiring lighting to be as described herein. It is feasible for the applicant to produce a final site plan showing light fixtures, specifications for fixtures and a lighting plan (including calculated light levels at the property line)'to comply with such a condition. For purposes of this decision, lighting does not cause adverse impacts -if it. casts not more than one foot-candle at the property line or if it is shielded to prevent light from being cast away from the building on which it is situated or toward the east or southeast. Condition of approval 3 should be modified to that effect. c. The proposed development will. create additional paved parking areas located in close proximity to the creek. Stormwater flowing over these paved parking areas will pickup oil, sediment and other pollutants, which could contaminate the, creek. However the applicant proposed to collect runoff from impervious areas and discharge it to a biofiltration swale, which will remove much of the pollutants. The applicant will discharge the'treated runoff onto the ground, where it will flow over the ground and through additional vegetation, which will filter out additional pollutants before it reaches CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 6 d. There is no substantial evidence in the.record that stormwater treatment and erosion control facilities will not function as designed:or will cause pollution or sedimentation of adjacent properties•or the creek. Neighbors' evidence about pollution from other sites is not relevant to this application. There is no evidence-that similar. conditions exist on the site or that. failures will or are probable 'on,this site. e. The proposed church expansion will attract additional people to-the _ immediate area, which may lead to an incremental increaselhe amount of litter, vandalism, and illegal activities. However the hearings, officer -finds that there is no substantial evidence in the record that members of 'the'church are any more'or'less likely to engage in nuisance, or illegal activities than other people or that such effects will result from the church. 3. The applicant requested an adjustment to the:intersection. spacing standards of TDC 18.705.030.H(3) to allow driveway access to Gaarde Street.. a: TDC 18.705.030.H(3) requires a minimum 600 feet between driveway and'street intersections on arterials such as Gaarde Street. The applicant's existing Gaarde Street access is located roughly 80 feet from the intersection of SW 1 I e Avenue and,SW. Gaarde Street. The applicant proposed to,close the existing access and construct a new driveway onto Gaarde Street located roughly 200.feet south of the 110` Avenue/SW Gaarde Street intersection: ; b. TDC 18.370.020.C(5) authorizes the hearings officer to approve an adjustment to the intersection spacing requirements if the application complies with the approval'criteria of TDC 18.370.020.C(5)(b): In this case the hearings officer finds" that the applicant failed to bear the burden of proof that the application complies with TDC 18:370.020.C~5)(b)(2) and (4); because adequate'alternative access is available to the site from SW 110 Avenue. Therefore the proposed adjustment cannot,be approved, because it does not comply with the applicable approval criteria. c. Prohibiting. access to Gaarde' Street.will increase the traffic volume and congestion on 11e Avenue andahe proposed-site driveways, since all.vehicles must use the'driveways onto this street to enter and leave the site. The additional traffic and congestion will likely be perceptible 'to area residents and church members. but it will not, exceed the capacity, of streets or create A'hazard based'.on Mr. Charbonneau's expert'- testimony. There is no substantial evidence to the contrary. J. Mr. Charbonneau testified at the hearing that routing all. of the traffic from the site will, not exceed the capacity of the 110 Avenue/Gaarde Street " intersection. In his,April'27, 2005 Memorandum he '.testified that-elimination of the' Gaarde Street driveway will cause "several detriments..'. "2 However he did not find that 2 He testified that closure of the Gaarde Street driveway will cause "[a]dditiorial impacts to .the [ 11(x` Avenue/Gaarde Street] intersection and 11dh Avenue... longer delays in'accessing the site:.. emergency vehicles will need to undertake a lon & route. and the residential neighborhood will experience additional traffic circulation and impacts.'.',. w -CUP 2004-00005 Hearings'Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Churdh) Page 7 . those "detriments" will violate City standards or create a hazard. A mere increase in delay and congestion is not sufficient to support a finding that the alternative access is unavailable. d. The proposed parking lot design without access-to Gaarde Street will create a long dead-end parking lot and vehicle accessway. This dead-end access way . could increase emergency response times and restrict emergency vehicle access to certain portions of the site, as Mr. Cliarbonneau noted in his'April 27, 2005 Memorandum. Therefore the hearings officer finds-that the applicant should be required to provide an emergency vehicle access to Gaarde Street if required by the Tualatin Valley Fire District. A condition of approval is warranted toAhat effect. e. The fact that the Church will generate the majority of its traffic on Sundays, when traffic volumes on Gaarde Street are lower is irrelevant, because it does not relate to the applicable approval criteria in TDC 18.370.020.C(5)(b).. f. The existence of other driveways on Gaarde Street that do not meet the intersection spacing requirements is irrelevant. The City has no authority to close-existing nonconforming'driveways. However the City can require' that, the applicant close its existing driveway and bring the site into compliance with current standards as a condition. ' of development approval. _ 4.-The applicant is required to demonstrate that adequate sight.distance is available at the mtersection of 110 Avenue and Gaarde Street, based on the posted speed of 35 mph or the 85t percentile, whichever is greater. The applicant is required to modify the intersection if necessary to provide adequate sight distance. See conditions of approval 13 and 29. All of the traffic from the proposed development will travel through tlhiis intersection. Therefore the hearings officer finds that this condition is "[n]ecessary to ensure the use is compatible with other use in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized.," TDC 8.330 . 030.B. Inadequate sight distance at this intersection will create a hazard and additional traffic generated-by. the proposed development will. exacerbate the hazard. Therefore the applicant should be.required to ensure that adequate sight distance is available. 5. The applicant is not required to provide a separate tract for the stormwater facility. The conditions of approval should be modified to that effect. „ ' . 6. The hearings officer finds that the applicant should be allowed to modify the phasing sequence as proposed at the hearin~,.provided the applicant demonstrates that adequate parking and landscaping are provided for each phase. D. CONCLUSIONS The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit and sensitive lands reviews do or can comply, with the applicable approval criteria and standards of the Tigard Community Development Code; provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal. laws and with conditions of approval warranted to. ensure such compliance occurs. The hearings officer further finds that the applicant failed to bear the burden of proof that, the adjustment complies with the applicable approval criteria and must be denied. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) page 8 E. DECISION The hearings officer hereby denies VAR2005-00016, and approves CUP 2004- 00005, SLR2005-00005 and SLR2005-00006 (Tigard First Baptist Church) as'described herein, subject to the following conditions -of approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ~ ~ a. 0 ~c~/-~(~ Y .~j~sya.a• ~ x.3 `'~rYt isy~.~ ~ti; ~-•,f The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: MORGAN TRACY 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information. is. found: ' 1. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall revise the landscape plans to show: A. Consistency between the proposed tree removal,plan,.site plan, and landscape plan with regard to tree removal and on site walkway locations. B. Additional vegetative screening along the west side of the lower parking lot. Any plantings that are proposed in the drainsgeway buffer will nee to, be native species appropriate for the area, per CWS standards. C. The extent of landsca ping . ' that will be provided for each phase. This is. to assist inspection staff in determining when the landscape is complete prior to finalinspection for each respective phase. Areas that will be graded or disturbed. shall be replanted with groundcover to prevent erosion. D. Trees in the parking lots and street trees as native species. The applicant shall consult with the City Forester to determine the species to be used. 2. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall revise the site/utility plans to show: A. The water quality facility shall be redesigned with input from both the applicant's engineer and arborist, to establish a location that can accommodate the, required treatment and detention, and maintain the existing trees. B. Either a) revise the' site plan to show no encroachments including structures, grading, or planted vegetation occurring in the existing pathway easement area or b) propose and construct a realigned pathway in a new easement location. If proposing a realignment, the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any other required approvals, such as sensitive lands review and CWS sign off, if the pathway is in the drainsgeway area. C: A note indicating the height of the masonry trash enclosure will be 6 feet minimum. D. The parking lot will comply with the Oregon Uniform Building Code by providing seven (7) ADA accessible spaces. This number may be reduced to 6 if the total parking provided is fewer than 200 spaces. The applicant shall additionally demonstrate that the minimum parking is provided for each phase after the appropriate number of ADA spaces are provided. E. The number of bicycle rack spaces to be provided in each location. A . minimum of 14 spaces are repaired for phase 1 and 2, and 28 spaces are required at the completion of Phase 3. F.. An area for a loading area. Staff suggests that the area in the Phase 2 parking lot turnaround be shown for this purpose. CUP 2004-00005:_ Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 9 G. The specific profile for,the sewer line, as it passes through the sensitive area. The applicant will need to, obtain explicif`approval from CWS regarding the sewer line work in this area; or else: revise their plan such that no work, in the buffer is required. If work in the buffer area is allowed, alternate methods of constructing the-line will.be required to be explored to minimize or eliminate the need for tree.removal'before'the city grants' approval to-remove these trees. Moreover, prior to removing an y' Irees in the sensitive land area, 'a tree. remoVal.penrut shall be obtained from the city. 3. Prior to any site work, the applicaritshall, submit -a detailed lighting plan prepared or approved by a professional engineer or other'qualified individual showing that. the light fixtures on the site do not cast more than one -foot-candle at the property lines abutting the site. Light fixtures shall be desiggned,. situated and/or.. . supplemented to prevent them from causing significant.off-site glare. Lights shall. comply with crone prevention requirements of the Tigard.Development Code - (TDC) Section 18.360:090(10). 4. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a revised tree removal plan that " clearly depicts the trees that will be removed and those that will be retained, and includes the following notations: A. The applicant shall notify the City Arborisf when tree protection measures :are in place so that lie may-verify that the measures will function properly ` nor to construction.. ' •B. If it is necessary-to entef the tree protection zone at any time with equipment (trucks, bulldozers, etc.) the project arborist and City. Forester must be notified before,.any entry'occurs. Before entering the TPZ, the, project arborist'and City'Forester shall'determine the method by which entrycan occur, along with any, additional tree protection measures. 5'. Prior to any site work,.the.appli6nt shall have the.'geotech.engineer reviewand approve the construction plans for the City's review and approval:. 6. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide evidence, of all. necessary ~ approvals from US Aniiy Corps of Engineers and the Division of State Lands. If ' . no approvals are required; the applicant shall submit a letter 'stating the reasons why no approval is required. ' The applicant shall prepare a cover letter.,and submit it, along with any supporting ' documents and/or plans that address the following reqquirements to the ENGINEERING'DEPARTMENT,',ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover'le'tter shallclearly, identify where in.the submittallhe required information is found: '7.- Prior to issuance of a site'pennit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is . required for this project to cover half street improvements and any other work the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering' Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings. required by the Building Division; and should only include sheets relevant to public' improvements. Public Facility Improvement I) permit plans shall conform.to Cittyy:of Tigard Public Impprovement Design n ndards,.which are available at City,-Hall and the City's web'page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 8. The PFI permit plan'subrhittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate'entity who will be designated as the `Perinittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public CUP 2004=00005' Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 10. improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 9. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose, of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement' construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and 'employees associated with the project. 10. Additional right-of-way shall be'dedicated to the Public along the frontage of. Gaarde to increase the right=of--way to 38 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way'centerline.' The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 11. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a . part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of 110 'Avenue. The . improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline . equal to 16 feet; •B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement, shall be built beyond the site frontage; C: concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary, to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk with a 5-foot planter strip; F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements;. G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by, applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; I:' underground utilities;, J. street signs (if applicable); K.. driveway apron (if applicable); and L... adjustments invertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 110x' Avenue ina safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 12. The applicant shall submit- construction plans to the En&eerin Department as a part of the PublicTacility Improvement permit, indicatinthat they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Gaarde Street as a part of this project: A. removal of the existing driveway, replacing it with curb and sidewalk; B. street trees spaced per TDC requirements; and C. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City.Engineer. 13. The applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary 'sight distance certification for the intersection of 110 Avenue and Gaarde Street, with a list of improvements required to meet the standard. The engineer shall use the posted speed of 35 mph or the 85 percentile, whichever•is greater. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 11 14. Sanitary. sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. A connection permit'is required for the reconnection of the sewer lateral to the main after lowering the lateral. 15. The applicant's engineer shall revise stormwater detention and water quality calculations with the actual impervious surface areas as reflected on Sheet Al. 16. ty extension of public water lines shall be shown on the proposed Public ility Improvement (PFI) permit construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Department plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system costs must be on deposit with the Water Department prior to approval of the PH permit plans from the Engineering Department and construction of public water lines. 17. The applicant shall provide anon-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 18. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement fFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to'the "Erosion Prevention an Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." 19. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. aT$E'FOLLOING CONDITIONS SHALL $ SATISFIED . 4 a c ~ ~ P~QR ~O Y~SIIANCE OF THE:BUILDING PERMIT ' The-applicant shall prepare a cover.letter and submit it, along with any,supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION; ATTN: MORGAN TRACY 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The cover letter, shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner'shall'record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than t2" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arbonst. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 21. 'Prior to any site work,. the area of the drainage facility must be. clearly identified. in the field with permanent fencing so as to insure no grading or material is placed in, this area. Any fencing that is damaged during construction must be replaced prior to final building inspection. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required informatiodis found: 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 12 ~v,k}.~,~, Fi F~~`~~~I~~'FQ~I1'O"W~~~C~~~~TI~,d,~I~I~.~L~ ~~~S~~~S~rE•D'1° • ~ t% _p"{Y'~ry? ~'a: iT +t. .•~spp~'rl p-bY 7' i ~ Y ~ j,T J ~ d.~~ri[~jy ^i ~ ai'r ~";~~I~Ql.! ~O A ~Y~AZ~~B ' ~ k G`~r7 ~Y k ~ ~ e 4 i e~`"ai~~! t;{,, y3+`s'~sikS, f ~~Sfi.K+ x~.. , p:;~:~+. ~ v.~ P~l..~~ O ~~3.•!t . ~ i _ ,•h« . The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting . documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLAl~iNING DIVISION, ATTN: MORGAN TRACY. 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The cover letter shall, clearly identify where in the submittal the "'required information is found' 23. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy on any building, the applicant must provide City staffwith a letter indicating that all of the provisions of Clean Water Services service provider letter (#4097) have been complied with. 24.. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy on any building, replant any area where vegetation has been removed as a result of grading in conformance with the Clean . Water Services Standards. 25. The applicant shall comply with the protection measures prescribed by the City •,Arborist. The applicant shall provide the City Arborist with'a construction sequence inclu mg installation and removal of tree protection devices clearing, grading, and paving: 26. Prior to final building inspection, the Project Arborist shall, submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their modified growing environment. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it,.along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT; ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: •27. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. ' .28; Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be.acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves; hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). 29.' The applicant's engineer shall provide final sight distan ce certification for the . intersection of 1,10 Avenue/Gaarde Street and the driveways on 110" Avenue. Final sight distar e certification will be required for the Phase 1 existing) driveway on 110 Avenue and the intersection prior to final building inspection. of . Phase 1. Final sight distance certification will be required for the Phase 2 (proposed) driveway on 110` Avenue prior to final building inspection of Phase 2. 30. The existing driveway on Gaarde shall be removed, prior to final inspection on Phase •1. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 13, . 31. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines'along SW 110' Avenue underground as. apart of this project, or they. shall pay the fee in lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the-utility lines-and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $21,000.00 and it shall be paid prior to final-building. inspection. 32. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the ap licant' shall employ the design engineer responsible for the. design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water duality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant _ stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection,, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in coinpfiance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. '455~''a4~TA''I OF A ptOALTT5 ~~CTS~ON ~E1~TAER~H~~EARII~TG~ OFFICER'. DECISION VOID DATED this 12'h day of May, 2005'. Joe Turner, Esq., AICP City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer CUP 1004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 14 Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: Aril 25, 2005, .Y' ',\':.-,..•y-_. . h.. .t:a Y!,:}: fT 3ih... .:iTtri:^r. r"?l`:, i`tY 'y .rit'e' u P.,7 ' .".C':a s~, '.'''r...s.S„'•`. S 5.'.lVt~'' .'f!C`k` i.1< + .•R :'ns!d At Sd;.P Lrtb`,~ oN S7°~".'-tc~ ..~y~1e~•r ,.~[.pn.s+'~-r-'~~ .._~dt ~:'r :.,..,~va:C','.: ?sT"+~~.i #:v";7-~Y~~!t,a•,,;_t 3t''`'i. 4 a 1 1JUXOtH. It— EPO' ifiN • .rk ) aVrya tr t?`) *e,.t",,^riS'•6'yn ' i Vy x.ti•tj'~C 1;1 k. ~~~ttt ' •'"~~~~~i-~ 's~ •f qi rrif'"rT'. v'~`r~ - NO- au q x ;,t 74 S `gg 1i4"aS. s're''°t 9~4#`w•s~t h's t~C A OF iIOARD t.sORT :))-~C1 *OT G ~}EGyO' Y, .y 4'tS i r'"'r yi a• I t ? [9 .t+` 4 n <~'r~• i.~ - e':..1 Lr.:Z iFTJ S•.R '1. •Yb] . :yt , l + A T., 7 20 = 5 .SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION CASE NOS: Conditional-Use Permit (CUP) CUP2004-00005 Sensitive Lands Review (SLR ) SLR2005-00005 Sensitive Lands Review (SLR) SLR2005-00006 Adjustment (VAR) VAR2005-00016 APPLICANT:. Architect LA OWNER: Tigga~nd First Baptist Church Attn: LarrryY Abel: 1T075 SW Gaarde Street 805 SE Sherman-Street Tigard,-OR 97223 Portland, OR 97214 PROPOSAL: The applicant is seeking approval for a three-phased.'expansion. Phase 1. consists of new on-site parking for.134 cars. ''No new°access to Gaarde Street is proosed with -this phase, but Sensitive Lands Reviews are required f6r.1he dramageway and steep slopes present on site.. Phase 2 consists of a new two story, 4450 square foot addition : between .the existing church and ministry buildings. This phase will also:. reconfigure -the existing parking lot to _provide access to the new addition, ;closing the existin access on SW GPaarde Street, - and constructingg: a new access from G~aarde Street to the new parking lot-in Phase 1. Kn Adjustment to the 600Joot access spacing standards is required. ..Phase 3 consists of a new two story 18,OOD square foot multi puurpose gymnasium building. With this phase, the 2,300 square foot "Bolt Hall" will De demolished and replaced by an additional 47 parking spaces. LOCATION: 11075 SW Gaarde Street; WCTM 2S103DC,'Tax Lot 01100. COMP PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate. detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum 'lot slze,'of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Cha ters 18.330,18.360,18.37O, 18.390, REVIEW 18.510, 18,705-18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, CRITERIA: 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION. 11. STAFF RECOMMENDATION ,t"FcQrr^endshat khe H,eann~s '©ff cer f nd that the ro ,posed ; Coridl rc~r~alJse'erm P rip( AA st ~a tiers I`{' aff ct he alt[{~► s e d ~ weff r e O MCI" t.. d rn 4t_ f h ~aarid. ^-'~3 ~L~~ t^v. Y' t TI~yS i.'Ye V ? Y.'k i ~ 9 a T rHR eesrtetpA Va tarda_rrdsrres_ou#llneo -in this report i ;Therefpre,aff i~canyends 4 %F ~o hetjCor,(di konal sp_ 4and Sensrtr<ve ,anc s 7?errn~ts; tit ceoQr>amends;, + S.. 'f I c a[ t ty r .4, b i y p i y ? ap^< s . Q11A`L ofrthe access spacing . adjustment, sl~biect eta the folloviringUco rTtendec! 'a ux t w g s E TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006/VAR2005-00016 PAGE 1 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITIONSOF APPROVAL ,,,='HE~QLLOINI:IVGONDITIONSFtA~.BE' A►NY SITE WQRK IS lA CE OF EIS TES a~~' i::: wR , . E , T I~ ERMI ; The applicant shall prepare a cover letter an submit it, . p long with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: MORGAN TRACY 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The cover letter shall clearly identify wherein the submittal the required information -is.found: . 1. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall revise the landscape plans to show: A. Consistency between the proposed 'tree removal. plan, site plan, and. landscape plan with regard. to tree removal and on site walkway locations. B: Additional vegetative screening along the west side of the lower parking lot. Any plantings that are proposed in the drainageway buffer will need to be native species appropriate for the area, per CWS standards., C. The extent of landscaping that will be provided for each phase. This is to assist inspection staff in determining when the landscape is complete prior to final l inspection for each respective phase. Areas that will be graded .or disturbed shall be replanted with groundcover to prevent erosion. . D. Trees in the parking.lots and street trees as native species. The applicant shall consult with the City Forester to determine the species to be -used. 2.. Prior to any site work, the applicant, shall revise the site/utility plans to show: A. The water quality tract shall be redesigned with input from both the applicant's engineer and arborist, to establish a location that can accommodate the required treatment and detention, and =maintain the existing trees. B. Either a) revise the site plan to show no encroachments. including structures, grading, or planted vegetation occurring in-the existing pathway easement area or b) propose and construct a realigned pathway in a new easement location. If proposing a realignment, the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any other required approvals,- such as sensitive lands review .and CWS sign off, if . the pathwa is in the'drainageway. area. C. A note, indYcating the height of the masonry trash enclosure will be 6 feet minimum. D. The parking lot will comply with the Oregon Uniform Building Code by providing seven (7) ADA accessible spaces. This number may be reduced to 6 if the ' total parking. provided is fewer than 200 spaces. The applicant shall additionally demonstrate that the minimum,-parking is' provided. for each phase after the appropriate number of ADA spaces are provided. E. The number ofpbicycle. rack spaces to be provided in each location. A minimum of 14 spaces are required for phase Land 2, and 28 spaces are required at the completion of Phase 3. F. An area fora loading area. Staff suggests that the area in the Phase 2 parking lot turnaround be shown for this purpose. G. The specific profile for the sewer line, as it passes through the sensitive area. The applicant will need to obtain explicit approval from CWS regarding the sewer line work in this area, or else revise their plan such that no work in the buffer is required; If work in the buffer-area is allowed, alternate methods of constructing the line will be required to be explored to minimize or eliminate the need for tree, removal before the city grants approval to remove these trees. Moreover, prior to removing any trees in the sensitive land area, a tree removal permit shall be obtained from.the City. 3. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall. submit a detailed lighting plan that shows no glare off site and complies with crime prevention. requirements of the Tigard Development Code (TDC) Section 18.360:090(10). TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP'2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 2 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 4. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a revised tree removal plan that clearly depicts the trees that will. be removed and those that. will be' retained, and includes the following notations: . A.. The applicant shall notify the City-'Arborist whenlree protection measures are in place so that he: may v.erify..that- -the .measures. will function properly prior.to construction: B. If it is necessary to enter the' tree. protection zone..at anytime with equipment (trucks, bulldozers, etc.) the project arborist and Cittyy. Forester must,be.notifed before any entry occurs.. Before entering the TPZ, the project arborist and City Forester shall .determine'the method by which.entry can occur, along with any • additional tree protection measures.. 5. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall have the geotech engineer review and approve the construction •plang r the City's review and approval: 6. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide evidence "of all necessaryapprovals from US Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of State Lands.. If no approvals are required, the applicant shall submit a letter stating the reasons.why no approval is required. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with•anyy supppportingg documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the EN.GINeERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642: The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the, submittal the, required information is found: . 7. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this 'project to cover half street improvements and any other work in the public right-of-way: • Six (6). sets of. detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Depart ment. NOTE: these plans are . in addition to any drawings required by the B.uilding Division and should only.include sheets re evant to public improvements. Public.Facili .Improvement (PFI) permit plans. shall conform to . City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci:tigard.or.us): 8. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone . number of the. individual or corporate entity wFo.viil be designated as the "Permittee% and who will provide the financial assurance.for the. public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC,'etc. Also specify the state within which the entity•is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to 'provide accurate information to the. Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 9. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking pplan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public, improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on. the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or. buildings proposed by this application, and shall. include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project, 10. Additional right-of-way shall -be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Gaarde to increase the right-of-way-to 38 feet from the centerline.. The description shall be tied to the existing rig ht-of-way centerline. 'The .dedication document shall 'be on City forms. Instructions, are available from the Engineering Department. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 3 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 11. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, whigo indicate that they will construct a half- street improvement along the frontage of 110 Avenue. The improvements adjacent. to this site shall include: A. City standard. pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutteras needed; D.. storm drainage, including any, off-site, storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk with a 5 foot planter strip; F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; - 1. underground utilities; J.. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or.horizontal alignment to'construct SW 110th-Avenue in a:safe manner, as approved by.the Engineering Department. 12. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public. Facility Improvement permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Gaarde Street as a part of this project: A. removal of the existing driveway, replacing it with curb and sidewalk; B. street trees spaced per TDC requirements; and. C: streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer. 13. The applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance -certification for the intersection of 110 Avenue•and Gaarde Street, with a list of improvements required tg meet the standard. The engineer shall use the posted speed. of .35 mph or the 85 percentile; whichever is greater. 14. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. A connection permit is required for,the reconnection of the sewer lateral to the main after lowering the lateral. 15. The applicant's engineer shall revise stormwater detention and-water quality. calculations with the actual impervious surface areas as reflected on Sheet Al. 16. Any extension, of public water lines shall 'be shown on the proposed Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Department plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system costs must be on deposit with the :Water Department prior to approval of'the PFI permit plans from the Engineering Department and construction of public..water lines. 17. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards, (adopted by Resolution and Order No. -00-7). Final plans and, calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 18. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion, Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning. Manual, February 2003 edition." TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016, PAGE 4 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 19. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City ' of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal can Water Act. • p ;Y',. a: ••.r..:. • 'r ,o>a 7 .ant..: i99:'yn • - • ~a~,,~', t,~ ..r, k~ ~~.~HE~FO~;LA11V'I~G~CQ~IDIT((~NS,SHAL'I~''B~ S~~~SF~EI~} r ~::~`}.~y ` s~ , ~~R~ ~'~~riPL~.IORrTO YSSU,~,NCE QI=¢Ti~E BI~TC.D~NG PER~IT~~_~ r~~~~~r,~ • ,,.f3ia 3, .5~4 :~i ~ 4Ji.t~:/.7 :.._..w ,7{' ei : =.Y, kl R`n aC •'?:=k''•t37;:. ~c.. ''Y•C • . e app. scant s a prepare a cover" etter._ an su mit it, a ong wit any . supPortmg docume.nts• and/or plans that address the .following. requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING .DIVISION, ATTN: MORGAN TRACY. 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The :cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: '20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicanVowner shall' record a deed restriction' to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arbodst. The deed restriction. may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance-with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 21. Prior to anye site work, the drainage tract must .be clearly identified' in the field with permanent ncing 'so as to insure.no grading or material is placed in this-area. Any fencing that is damaged during construction must be replaced prior to .final, building inspection. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting g requirements to the ENGINEERING documents and/or lans that address the followin 1 DEPARTMENT, ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-639-417, EXT 2642.. The cover fetter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 22.. .Prior to - issuance of a building permit, the'. applicant shall pay. an addressing fee. . (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). NG"CONDITION S"S E' L ItVAL' lJl TORTO:A~f IN. INS T~'EC' B IO e app scant shall. prepare a' cover etter an su mit it, -along with any `supporting documents andlor plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: MORGAN TRACY 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The cover letter shall'clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 23: Prior to. the .issuance of final occupancy on-'any building, the applicant must provide City.staff with a, letter indicating that all of the provisions of. Clean .Water Services service provider letter (#4097) have been complied. With.' 24. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy on any building,. re=plant any area. where .vegetation has been removed as a result of grading in conformance with the Clean Water Services Standards. 25. The, applicant shall comply with the protection measures prescribed- by• the City Arborist.. The applicant shall provide the City Arborist with a construction sequence including installation and. removal of tree protection devices,. clearing, grading, and paving. 26. •Prior_to final building inspection, the Project Ardorist-shall submit a final certification. indicating., the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their modified growing environment. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 5 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with. any su orting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 27. Prior to a final. building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, ..obtain conditional acceptance from the ' City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 28. Prior to final. building. inspection, the applicant shall provide the Ci with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as- builts in. "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as- built drawings shall be tied to the City s GPS network. The applicants engineer shall rovide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins; water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to. NAD 83 (91). 29. The applicant's pgsneer shall provide final sight distance certcation for the intersection of 110 Avenue/Gaarde Street and the driveways on 110' Avenue. Find sight distance certification will be. required for the Phase 1 (existing) driveway on' 110 Avenue and the intersection prior to final building inspection of Phase, 1. Final sight • distance certification will be" required for the Phase 2 (proposed) driveway on 110 Avenue prior to final building inspection of Phase 2. 30. The existing driveway on Gaarde shall be-removed prior to`final inspection on Phase .31. The applicant shall either place the existing. overhead . utility. lines along SW 110t, Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they, shall pay* the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. • If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $21;000.00 and it shall.be paid prior to final building inspection. 32.'- To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the .private water. quality facility to perform construction' and visual observation of • the water quality facility . for compliance with the 'design. and . specifications.. These inspections shall be . made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the city of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and. specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. f~:t~UtE FTOAT~$FTHE 3 :CONDITIQVS OF APQROVAL [THIN :CIIfJIT 'S~FH'THE FFC~'fV~ :DATE OF:THE; .HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION ::SFfiALL RE~DFR', THE GH A I~VGS OFFICER'S'DtCISION. VOID.. 3 f . SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site is presently, developed with a church, classroom: building, and small ministry. The site was originally developed in the county in 1962 with the construction of Bolt Hall. In 1985 a conditional use approval %Ue. 2-85) was granted'to construct the main church and ministry buildings. • In 1987 a lot adjustment MIS87-0.3) was approved for the site. This adjustment reconfigured the lot Imes of two (2) of the properties owned by the church. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005 /SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 6 .OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The. church requested and received conditional use approval in. 1996 (CUP96-00008) to locate an 8,000 square foot' office building on the site. The City has no record of other more recent development applications having been fled for this property. Vicinity_ Information: 7o the South, nortand east, the site is adjoined by existing residential uses. To the.west, the site slopes downward toward a'wetland and Derry Dell. Creek: Further to the west, the site is adjoined by another religious assembly use and other residential uses. Site Information and Pro osal Description* e site is developed with a church, a classroom and parking lot. The applicant has proposed a three-phased expansion of the Church facilities: Phase 1 consists o new on-site parking for 134 cars. No new access to Gaarde is proposed with this. phase, but sensitive lands reviews are required for the drainageway and steep slopes present on site: Phase 2 consists of a new two story, 4450 square foot addition between the existing church and ministry buildings. This phase will also reconfigure the existing parking lot to provide access .-to the new addition, closing the existing access on SW Gaarde, and constructiin a -new access from Gaarde to the new parking lot in Phase 1. An adjustment to the 600 foot access spacing standards is required. Phase 3 consists of a new two story 18,000 square foot multi purpose gymnasium building.. With this phase, the 2,300 square foot "Bolt Hall". will be demolished and replaced by an additional 47 parking spaces.. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING,PROCEDURES. PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 - Lists the Use Categories: The applicant is proposing to amend the existing conditional-use permit to allow for phased construction of a new gymnasium, an addition.to the school, and a new community building along with the associated sitework. 'Churches are permitted by Conditional' Use. in` all zones. The adjustment and sensitive lands reviews that.have been requested are typically reviewed administratively. However, when different requests are reviewed concurrently, the highest review authority renders the. decision on all matters .in the application. In this case, the application is subject to a public hearing before the City of Tigard Hearings Officer. Summa of Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 : Defines the ecision-ma ang type to which the land-use application is assigned. The'proposed amendment,to the existing Conditional Use permit. is.a Type III-HO decision. The proposed adjustment to the street ,and driveway spacing requirement is a Type II review, and the proposed Sensitive Lands reviews for steep slopes and drainageways are also Type II .reviews. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS, The Tigard Community Development. Code requires that property owners'within 500 feet of. 'the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In addition, the aplicant .is required to ost the site with notice of the public hearing. Staff has verified that the' site is posted. Staff has not. received.any comments from any property owners as of the date of this staff report., TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 7 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case, in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: ; A. rAdditi Conditional Use Criteria pprova ' n ena al Conditions of Ap proval) B. ble Development Code Standards 18.330 Conditional Uses).. 18.360 Site Development Review) 18.370 ariances and Adjustments) .18.510 Residential Zoning) 18.705. Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.775 Sensitive Lands Review) .18.790..,- ree Removal) 18.795 Isual Clearance) C. Additional Site Development Review A roval.Standards - 0. tree an i im rovemen tan ar s. E. mac Study (18.390) SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A.. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the. purpose of this.-chapter is to providq;.;standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged o'r altered if the site is. appropriate and if other appropriate conditions . of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public.facilities require a case-by-case review, and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A statesAhat.a request for approval for a new conditional use shall . be processed as -a Type .III-HO procedure, as.regulated by Chapter 18.390050, using approval criteria contained in. Section 18.330.030A' and subject to other. requirements in Chapter 18:330. . Section 18.330.020.D, states the criteria for phased development approval. As part of the approval process, - the Hearings Officer shall approve a time schedule for developing a site in phases over. a period of time of one year, but' in no case shall the total time period for allhases be greater than three years without reapplying:. for conditional use review. The criteria for approving a ,phased conditional. use review proposal is that all'of the following are satisfied: The applicant. has proposed a three phased approval for this project. There is no schedule submitted for initiation or completion of each p' hase. Nevertheless, all three phases,will need to be completed prior to the three year expiration period pursuant to this section. ; 1. The public facilities shall be constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase. ; Public facilities will be completed as part . of Phase 1,-as conditioned in this report. 2. The development and occupancy of any phase shall not be dependent on the use of temporary public facilities. A temporary public facility is any facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE B OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER No temporary facilities are proposed. 3. The phased development shall, not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct; public facilities that were required as part of the approved development proposal. There is an existing bike and pedestrian path easement which was required as part of a 1985 Conditional Use .approval. The initial staff report required the pathway be constructed and the oreenway be dedicated, however, the final conditions of,approyal in that decision merely required the pathway easement: ' The path was never constructed. The applicant .s present plans include encroachments into this easement, and to compensate the applicant has proposed to dedicate a blanket pathway. easement over the entire sensitive area for this . purpbse. On further consideration, staff determined that the pathway alignment should not . be shifted further into, the' drainageway, unless the. applicant was willing to undertake, obtaining approvals and construct the portion of the. pathway in the realigned easement. The City. has already accepted the burden of constructing the ppathway in the current easement as part of that 1985 approval, but should . not be 'responsible for the additional cost and effort associated with developing the, path in' a different alignment. 'The applicant will be responsible for constructing any portion of the pathway that is realigned from its previously approved location. General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: : e site size an dimensions provide adequate area or the nee s of the proposed use; 'The existing site size is 4.65 acres in. size: This'report evaluates the proposal and necessary review, criteria for the site. The site size appears. adequate forthe needs of. the proposed expansion. However, staff is concerned about accommodating a bicycle pedestrian path on the site, after the proposed improvements are completed. .The characteristics of the site are suitable-for the proposed use-considering size, shape, location. topography, and natural features; The site contains 'a steeply sloped area 'with a drainage way beneath. ' .Nevertheless, the applicant's plan takes this into consideration; by maintainingg the required buffer setbacks, and uttinthe parking area parallel to the hillside slope. The building is additionally designed to take advantage of the grade differential,' rather than pad grading for the entire building. This helps minimize the amount of required fill and retaining structures. The size, shape, and location of the site all appear suitable. Thesite is suitable for,the proposed development. All required public facilities havd'adequate capacity to: serve the proposal; and According to the comments received, all public facilities. incl ud i ng streets, storm-and sanitary sewers, andwater can adequately serve the site. This criterion is'satisfied. The applicable requirements of the zoning :district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional 'standards in the R-3.5 zone, the additional dimensional requirements for religious facilities are specified in the Conditional Use Standards of Section 18.330.050.B.9 and the dimensions proposed for this development. (SEE TABLE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE) . TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 9 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER J'r w'ty>•r, e. Y k: ✓ Sb 4'':%ie.f si Y t*+p ^y„ev.•~g L14, V3~...F~, d,% 9+ ~r•''F?5{ •,'1`ei•':•=;y~'`~C3 ~D lof {'I.I ~R~p S~' _•'N r``,.-n'~ y~S1~Al'~? , ItD~', r'+.. 4'ti'Y"• t 4 a 7 ,`^vti d' i ^ sY k x Lt' tttn~ $fr]'.. 2,45 • f + „+.;.~iaW,r 114 ~r'zs }fix - 8xa ry? e rk._Qf1~RE~ti {t'f~'ii~ .00 Minimum Lot Size 10,000 sq. ft. 20,000 sq. ft 202;702 sq. ft Minimum Lot Width 65 ft. n/a 610 ft Minimum Setbacks Front yard 20 ft. 25 ft 32.5 ft Side facing street on corner & through lots 20 ft' 20 ft '15 ft. along SW 1101 Side yard 10 ft 20 ft 120 ft i Rear yard 20 ft 20 ft 205 ft. Maximum Height 30 ft. SAME AS R-3.5 . "30 ft. Maximum Site Coverage (2] - SAME AS R-3.5 46% at Phase III Minimum Landscape Requirement - SAME ASR-3.5 54% at Phase 111 Presently the structure is non conforming, and encroaches approximately,5 feet into the required•yard. All proposed structures will meet the current 20 foot setback requirements. The 30 foot height Js calculated from a reference point, 10 feet above the lowest grade (due to the sloped nature of the site), to the midpoint of the highest gabled roof. The site contains structures that are. considered ,non-conformingg with respect to setback requirements. According to the non_conformingg chapter of the Tigard -Development Code Section 18.760.040(C), . a non-conforming structure, may continue to be used, enlarged, or altered, as long as it does not increase the non-conformity of the structure; as long as it is not moved, or as long as it is not-destroyed by any means beyond 60% of its assessed value. The applicant intends on maintaining this structure as is, and the newly expanded portion will follow present setback requirements. The height of the proposed building is at the absolute maximum, with no margin for error. The applicant. Is put on notice that any revisions or alterations that occur in the field to respond to specific site- or building constraints that result in an increase in the building height will require compensatory measures to. ensure the overall height of the building is kept at or below 30 feet. .FINDING: The, proposed expansion satisfies the dimensional standards of the underlying zone. The supplementary .,requirements set forth-in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780; Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable,.are met or can be conditioned to be satisfied. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site. Development Review; 18.370, Variances and Adjustments; 18.390, Decision Making Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental.. Performance Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage; 18.775, Sensitive Lands;. 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility. Improvement - Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters .are addressed further in this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of, the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; '(8.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 1p8..785, Temporary Uses; and 18:798, Wireless Communications Facilities: These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the•Comprehensive•Plan. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 10 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT.TO.THE HEARINGS OFFICER The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance . with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. A review of the.comp plan did not reveal any,•policies that are adversely affected by this proposal,, provided a solution can be found for the pathway alignment along the creek. (Failure to provide such a . pathway. easement is in violation of the Park Master Plan,', and, several sections of the Community Development Code) FINDING: Based on the.analysis above, and the condition. imposed on the devalopment,- the.General Approval Criteria fora Conditional Use can be satisfied. . Additional Conditions of A roval for. Conditional Use. Section 18 . states a e Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to 'ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity; and .that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding use's and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; The majority of activities for the Church -occur on Sundays and the school operates on the weekdays. A, search of the City's code enforcement records shows no complaints against the existing church operations. Staff does -not find any justification to impose conditions limiting the hours, days, and/or manner of operation, Requiring design features, which minimize environmental impacts. such 'as noise, vibration, air pollution,-glare, odor and/or dust; The hazards related to odor, dust, noise, glare,, air pollution, and vibration can be mitiggated through the design of the building and the buffering and landscaping of the use that hasbeen proposed. Those hazards that are Inherent during construction will be held to" the same standards as other construction within the City of Tigard as regulated by the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC). All. of these items will, be subject to code enforcement if the applicant exceeds the allowed levels. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; The. buffer requirements are .discussed further in this report. There does not appear to be any basis for requiring additional setbacks, lot area, or depth and width. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the applicant has designed and placed the building such that it meets the underlying zone-requirements, including height and lot coverage. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; The applicant's second phase includes a proposal,to relocate an accesq,on SW Gaarde approximately 130 feet further to'the west (200.feet away from SW 110 Avenue)..- The .applicant has applied for, an adjustment to vary from the standard.. 600 foot spacing requirement along arterials.. The a , plicant's. proposed access, while an improvement from the present access point 70 feet frrom the intersection, is still far short (roughly 400 feet deficient) of the • requirement.. . Staff will address the adjustment later in this decision, however, to further support staffs position regarding this proposed access point, the-following is also offered. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 11 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The proposal will add 'roughly 20,000 square feet including a gymnasium with seven classrooms. This not. only will increase the amount of. traffic 'that comes to -the site for. religious services,, but will. also increase. the. traffic throughout the Week.. Regardless, even . without .any increase. in traffic, the accesses on SW G'aarde both existing and proposed do not meett access spacing standards. SW Gaarde :is .designated as.an arterial street, while SW 110t Avenue is a neighborhogd route. At completion of. Phase 3, the site will have two conforming accesses on, SSW 110 which provide the required level of access pursuant to TDC 18.705. Since the site will be served by the appropriate number of access which also L conform to the spacing standards without an access on SW Gaarde, staff recommends that the existing as Well as the proposed 'access on. SW Gaarde not be permitted. it is in the public interest to eliminate, to the.extent practicable, access points on designated arterials. Staff.. acknowledges that there are instances where this cannot. be accomplished and still provide access to the parcel, but.this is not one of. those instances.. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved, Street dedications are. proposed; and improvements requested which are addressed later in this report.. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage` and/or, surfacing of parking and loading areas; Landscaping,. screening, drainage, and parking have been addressed individually and in detail later in this report. The applicant's plans include a landscaping' plan. . Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting -of signs; There are no new signs proposed at this time, and the applicant has indicated, that any new signage will. be applied for at a later date. Compliance with the sign requirements for. the underlying zone will be considered once an application is submitted. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor 1ighting; No specific lighting has been proposed. -The orientation and placement of the buildings on the site, will. rhinimize'.potential. for off site impacts, as they are clustered at the southeast corner and separated form residences by either, the. creek, . parking area, or streets. However, it is presumed that there will be lights in the parking lot that should be shielded so. as to not cause glare into' nearby residential , yards. This will be addressed under the Site Development Review Criteria later in.thls report. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and 'the establishment of-standards for their installation and maintenance; The site is appropriately buffered and landscaping to screen the parking area is proposed, so ' additional screening is unnecessary. Requiring and designating the,-size' height, location and/or materials for fences`; No new fences are proposed'with this application., and there are no screening. standards that. would necessarily require fencingg with the exception of the trash receptacles. This criterion is addressed in•more. detail.under landscaping and screening, and mixed solid waste and recycling. Requiring the protection and preservation of 'existing. trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or, drainage areas; TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 12 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • Some of the trees on site are scheduled for, removal to accommodate construction. The applicant has provided a tree. preservation plan that will be discussed further in this report. The watercourse and drainage area provides the- greatest' amount of habitat on the site, which is otherwise predominantly formal lawn with scattered trees. The CWS provider letter requires protection and preservation of the stream and its buffer. There is an area where the applicant has proposed a stormwater treatment facility that would require the removal, of 3 trees. Staff feels that this can be redesigned in a manner so that these trees can be' preserved. A condition to that effect will be imposed: - Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain n-when land form alterations and development are allowed within. the 100-year floodplain; and- This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain; therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain. in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This. development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain,, therefore, a condition is not necessary, however, there is a pedestrian/bicyycle pathway easement on- the site. This pathway easement was required as part of the 1985 Conditional. Use approval. The applicant's plans, show the parking lot encroaching into this, easement alignment. The pathway has not been constructed on or, directly adjacent to the site, but is present about 500 feet north of the site. The applicant notes that as part of the Gaarde Street improvement roJJect, a retaining wall was installed at the terminus of the easement that makes accessing W Gaarde infeasible from the site. Staff questions'this rationale since at least a portion of the easement is in the throat of the proposed vehicular driveway. Regardless, the issue around the easement is that the proposed improvements .encroach in to this area. After speaking to the long range planning division, they indicated that there was strong interest in completing this pathway between Gaarde. and Eden Court. Staff recommends that the site plan either be revised to show that no encroachments will occur in this area (including additional grading) or that a pathway will be constructed by the applicant in an alternate alignment with .a new easement recorded.over the revised alignment.. Staff recognizes that Clean Water Service standards may. not permit a pathway to be constructed in the stream buffer. Also, staff recognizes that the applicant has not proposed or addressed the criteria for such development in the sensitive areas. Therefore, prior to construction of the pathway, approval fora sensitive lands permit will be required. Responsibility for construction and permit approvals shall lie with 'the ' City, unless the pathway easement location is revised by the applicant, in which case, the applicant shall be responsible for such construction and approvals., FINDING: Additional, conditions should be imposed to address the potential impacts of this conditionally allowed use. CONDITIONS: • No access to SW. Gaarde shall,be permitted. Existing access to SW Gaarde shall.be removed'with. Phase 1 construction. • Prior to any on site improvements,, the water quality tract shall be redesigned with input from both the applicant's engineer and arborist, to establish 'a location that can.accommodate the required treatment and detention, and maintain the existing trees., TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 13 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Prior to any on site: improvements, the applicant shall either a) revise the site plan -to show no encroachments including structures, grading, or planted vegetation occurring in the existing pathway easement area. or b) propose and construct a realigned pathway in a new,easement location. If proposing a realignment, the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any other required approvals, such as sensitive lands review and CWS sign off, if the pathway is in the drainageway area. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Site Develo ment Review - Chapter 18.360: The bite Development eview 'approval standards require that. a development proposal • be found to-be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The proposal's consistency.with these Code Chapters isreviewed in the following sections. n Variances and Ad"ustments = Cha ter 18.370: The applicant as reqqueste an,a Jus ment to Fe street. and driveway spacing requirements. Section 18.705.030.H.3 states "The minimum- spacing; of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet." SW Gaarde is classified as an Arterial street. The current access is approximately 80 feet from the intersection of SW 110t and SW Gaarde. The proposed access will be 200 feet tProm this intersection. It is.also noted that two other accesses are, proposed along SW 110 Avenue, which are only subject to meeting a 150 foot setback from the intersection, which these will meet. Adjustment to access and egress standards (Chapter 18.705). In all zoning districts where access and egress drives cannot be readily designed to : . conform to Code standards within a particular parcel,- access with an adjoining property shall be considered. If access in conjunction with another parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, . the Director may grant. an. adjustment to the. access requirements of Chapter 18.7051hrough a Type 11 procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.030, using the following approval criteria: Access with another parcel on SW Gaarde is not reasonable, due -to the. presence of the intervening'creek. However, access is still provided to the site via two alternate driveways on another street. The Director. may approve,. approve with conditions, or deny.: a request, for : an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: (1) It is not possible to share access; As previously. described, it is not possible to share access with the parcel to the west. There is no need to share access with the -parcel to the, north, since conforming accesses are proposed here. (2) There are .no 'other' alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; There are no alternative access points on the street in question,.but as indicated on the site .plan., not only is access available from another street, it is proposed, and conforms to code requirements. This criterion is not satisfied. (3) The access separation requirements cannot be met; Access separation cannot be met for SW Gaarde, but conforming accesses are proposed on SW 110 This criterion is not satisfied., (4) The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access; TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 14 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . • Based . on the previous findings, this criterion is. not satisfied. The minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access,is no adjustment whatsoever. (5) The approved, 'access or access approved with conditions will result ' in a safe access; and There is inadequate substantial evidence to demonstrate this criterion is met. (6) The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. There is inadequate substantial evidence to demonstrate this criterion is met -based on the presence of the retaining wall at SW Gaarde near the creek, in relation to the grades that are present. .FINDING: Based on the findings above, especially criteria 2, . 3, and'-4, the requested. adjustment is denied. Residential Zoning Districts - Cha ter 18.510: ' Tfie residential zoning is ric , eve opmen standards are discussed previously in this report under the Conditional Use standards. It should be- noted that Religious Institutions are permitted conditionally in all residential zones. Access Egress and Circulation 'Chapter •18:705: Public Street Access: All. vehicular access and, egress •as . required. in Sections' 18.705.030(H) and 18.705.030(1) shall connect directly'with a public., or -private street. approved by the city for public use . and shall be ,maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis; The site is surrounded on two sides by public streets. The site currently has existing access from SW 110t . Avenue, and SW Gaarde:. % Staff. is' recommending that the access tq SW Gaarde be removed with completion of Phase 1. Nevertheless, .with access, to SW 110.. this criterion is satisfied. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following ..standards: Walkways . shall extend from the ground floor entrances orfrom the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all, commercial; institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes.. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; ' The proposal involves a two phased expansion of the. existing facilities... The applicant has, indicated that the site is' a campus setting, and the site plan shows the. expansion ,of the existing sidewalk, network on siiW being' extended to the'new buildings, and to the right-of-way along SW Gaarde and SW. 110 Avenue. This criterion has been satisfied. } Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except. that pedestrian* crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances,no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscapping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions. such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and.shall*be.in-compliance with ADA standards; and TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016. PAGE 15 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER. The walkways have been.. identified on the site . Ian and discussed briefly within the narrative. No proposed walkway is less than 5-feet in width, and there are no walkways over 33 feet in length, that cross traffic aisles. There is a discrepancy between the landscape plan and the site plans where landscaping has been shown in the walkway areas. Clearly the architect and landscape architect will have to resolve these discrepancies prior to final construction document. approval. Should . there be any walkways that cross vehicle aisles (none are proposed)', the above standards shall apply. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as .:concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc.. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public. use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant has indicated to staff that the new sidewalks will be,constructed of concrete. This criterion has-been addressed. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial User Section 18.705.030.1 provides the. minimum access requirements for. commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width 'for developments with 100 or more parking spaces is two 30-foot-wide access with a 24- foot pavement width or one 50 foot wide access. There are several proposed accesses onto the site. With the denial of the requested adjustment, the only two accesses will be provided. These two accesses meet the minimum dimensional requirements. of 30 feet in width with 24 feet of. pavement. This standard is satisfied: Access Management (Section 18.705A30.H):_. . Section 18.705.030.H:1 states that an -access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals' which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards" t-, set by ODOT, Washington County,, the City and AASHTO. Charbonneau Engineering has submitted a Traffic Analysis Re Tort for this project, dated April 2004. The report addresses sight distance at the proposed driveways. According to the engineer the sight distance is adequate at the. driveways on- 110 n Avenue. The report did not address sight distance at the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110t Avenue.. The report states that the speed is 25 mph, which is incorrect. Gaarde Street.is an Arterial-with a posted speed of 35 mph. The applicant's. engineer shall provide preliminary- sight distance certification using the correct speed, for the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110 Avenue, along with a list of required improvements, with their Public 'Facilities Improvement (PFI) permit application Final,slght distance certification will .be required for the Phase I (existing) driveway on 110. Avenue and the intersection prior to final building in of Phase I. inal sight distance certification will be required for the Phase II (proposed) driveway.on 110"', Avenue prior to final building inspection of-Phase II. Section 18.705.030.H.2,states that driveways shall not be permitted to be.placed in the influence- area of collector or arterial street intersections.. Influence area of ' intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form ~ on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway' setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall. bell 50 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where 'a project has less . than 150 feet of, street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If -shared'access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible:: TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016' PAGE 16 OF 37' 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Gaarde Street is classified as an Arterjl on the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP). The existing driveway on 1.10.. Avenue is.over 250 feet north of Gaarde Street, thereby meeting this criterion. The existing driveway on Gaarde Street is only about 80 feet west of the 110 Avenue intersection, which does not meet this standard: The existing driveway shall be removed prior to final building inspection of Phase I. Section'. 18.705.030.H.3.and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and, streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along.an arterial shall .be 600 feet. ":The minimum spacing of locatstroets along ''a local street shall be 125 feet: . The classification` of 110th Avenue is a Neighborhood Routelocal street); therefore this spacing.standard does not apply to the,'driveways located on 110 Avenue. Gaarde Street is, classified as a 3 Lane"Arterial requiring spacing .of 600 teet'between streets and driveways. The existing driveway p only about 0 feet from 1101 Avenue, while the proposed driveway is 220 feet from 110 Avenue. Both driveways do not meet this spacing standard and are, in fact, substantially below the standard. Staff recommends denial of the proposed driveway, as it does not meet the standard and cannot meet the adjustment and variance criterion: Staff has previously recommended removal of the existing driveway because of its location within the influence area of, an Arterial. intersecAion (See 18.705.030.H.2). The development has two driveways that can be utilized on 110 Avenue, both. of which are in compliance with the Access Management.,standards of 18.705.030.H. FINDING: There are discrepancies in the submitted plans and inaccuracies in the sight distance calculations.. CONDITIONS: Prior to any site work, the applicant shall coordinate with the. landscape architect to make the site plan and landscape plan consistent with regard to tree removal and on site walkway locations. • The applicant's engineer shall provide ; preliminary sight distance certification using the correct speed, for the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110th Avenue, along with a list of. required improvements, with their Public Facilities Improvement (PFI) permit application. . Final sight 'distance. certification will be required for the Phase I. (existing) driveway on 11 Oth Avenue and the intersection prior to final building inspection of Phase.l•.' Final sight distance certification will be required for the Phase ll (proposed) driveway on 11.0th Avenue prior to final building inspection of Phase II. Environmental Performance Standards.- Cha ter 18.725: Requires a e era an state environmental laws,.ru es and regulations"be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance ::Standards regulates: Noise, visible. emissions, vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the . provisions : of Sections 7.41.130 . . 'throug 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Within the Commercial zoning districts and the Industrial Park. (I-P) " zoning district,' ere shall be no use,- operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from, space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a ppropperrttyy line. Department of. Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. _ Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is perm lea in any given zoning. district, which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 17 OF 37 4/25105 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . Odors. The emissions of odorous ,'gases or other matter in. -suchquantities as to be rea i y detectable at any point beyond ahe property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply: Glare and Heat. No direct or.sky reflected glare, Whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be :permitted, and; 1).there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible' at the lot Iine of the source; and 2)'these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking 'areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavanon;work otherwise' permitted by this-title. The issue related to headlightglare onto adjacent properties has been addressed elsewhere in this report. Additional landscaping, is required "Jo help shield this glare. Also,. cutoff 'shielding will be required on parking lot lighting to avoid glare onto adjacent properties.. Insects and Rodents- All materials including wastes, shall be stored and all rounds shall e.main ine in a manner which will not attract, or aid the propagation of insects." or rodents or createa health hazard. FINDING: Based on the information provided by. the applicant, the expanded use of the pproperty.will conform to the above requirements. Staff finds that the potential ..for glare exists from the parking areas, but this is conditioned elsewhere in this report. Additionally, if for some reason the above standards were' in question, and it was. subsequently found,thatthe use"was out of.compliance with any of . the above . standards, the • roperty. owner, would be subject to code enforcement, court review;,and-possible fines until they were brought back into, compliance. Landscaping and Screenin - Chapter 18.745:' tree trees: Section states- tat -all . development projects -fro roting on a public street. shall, be required to' plant. street trees -in accorcance..with, Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 'require's that street trees .be spaced -between 20 and, 40 .feet apart depending on the size'classification -of :the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Street trees (Aristocrat Pear).-,are shown along both frontages of the site planted at 25 feet on center: Re-vegetation: 18.745.060 states that where -natural vegetation has been removed, through grading in areas not affected by the. landscaping requirements and that are not to. be occupied by structures, such areas. 'are to'be replanted as set forth. in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are.completed.. The applicant is seeking approval of the development as phased construction. The applicant's landscape plan is'reflective of completion of all three phases. What is. difficult to discern with this application is what landscaping improvements will occur with each:'phase. In particular, will the applicant install'landscape material in -an area.that will be'dater.occupied by a building or parking area? That does not seem to make. sense, yet,. having no landscaping in these. areas . raises erosion concerns. Staff has already identified discrepancies between the site and .landscape. plans, and recommended' new .landscae plans,. be submitted. • In addition, the applicant should submit a ,three. phase 'landscape,' plan that' identifies. what landscaping will occur with each phase of'the development.' Land Use Buffering and. Screening: Buffering and Screening is required between different tXpe"s' of land uses. It is the intent of these standards to provide for privacy., and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise , pollution that a development site may impose on- adjacent properties. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CU"P,2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006N, R2005-00016 PAGE 18 OF 37 4/25/05'PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO.THE HEARINGS OFFICER The proposed use is, in a residential zone and abutting residential' uses on'jour, ssides.'.,. The screening standards of TDC 'Section 18.745.050(E)(1•), and the buffering requirements,of Table . 18.745.1 do not'. specifically speak to religious- facilities because. they, are . permitted conditional)y. There is an inherent difference .betwee'n.' the' uses, however, the facility is separated from those uses by eights-of=way natural. resources, or :a large buffer on the'north side (approximately 60 feet), and the code does not require buffering along right-of-way.: The appplicant's landscape plan provides suitable landscaping for ;the -completed project. This criterion i satisfied. Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.745050.E requires the screening .of parkingg.and'1' 'adingg areas.. Landscaped narking areas. shall :include special design features, which. effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative- balance between low lying : and vertical shrubbery and trees.. Trees shall be planted in landscaped. islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each 'seven (7) parking. spaces -in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands, shall be three (3) feet wide ..and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has provided, a 'p`reliminaty landscape, plan that shows. the final -landscape plan., for phase 3..lBased on this plan, it appears that the parking,area.will be appro riately screened from SW 110 Avenue. Staff is concerned by the parking lot that Will ..extendpdown the hill on the west side of-the site. This row. of parking mar t headlights,focused on.residences across . the creek: It is noted that the current parking lot is oriented the same direction and sits up higher; but from visiting the site, it seemed that,these headlights are not only. further away, but are' also at a ,high enough elevation so. as not to .cause ,glare. into the opposite dwellings.. In order to mitigate for this impact, additional screening, along the west side. of the lower parking - lot should be added. Staff also notes that the buffer imit is right up to the parking area, so any, ' screening would have to be comprised of native vegetation. FINDING: Additional screening should be provided 1o 'shield headlight glare. The.proposal fails to identify how landscaping-will be addressed with Phase I and Phase II. CONDITIONS: • ` Prior to any. site work, the applicant shall submit revised landscape' plans that show additional vegetative screening along the west side of, the lower parking lot.. Any plantings that are proposed in. the drainageway buffer will, need.to be native species appropriate for the area, per 'CWS , standards. • Prior to any site work, the applicant'shall submit revised landscape plans 'that show the extent of landscaping that will be provided for eacF~ phase: This is to assist inspection staff in determining when the landscape is compplete prior to final inspection for each respective phase. Areas that- will be graded or disturbed shall be 'replanted. with groundc6ver to prevent erosion. Mixed Solid Waste and .Rec clables Storage - Chapter 18.755: Chapter 18. 'requires that new construction, mcorpora es`functional, and -adequate space. for on site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste -and source ` separated Recyclables priorJo pick-up.and removal by haulers.. The applicant. must choose one (1) of the following, four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard; 1lWVaste Assessment, Comprehensive. Recycling Plan, or Franchised.' Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to.submit evidence or a,plan, which indicates compliance with'this section. Re ardless'of which method chosen,.the applicant will have to submit a written sign=offfrom-the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-0,0016 PAGE 19 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The applicant has met the franchise hauler review and sign off.method. This standard is met. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage. area for source-se arated recyclable. shall be co located with, the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Igdoor and. outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire. .Code . requirements; Storage area space requirements can, be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior-storage. areas can be .located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in. a ,yard'adjacent to a publicor private street;. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and'-visible. locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior, storage areas can be located in a . parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the, minimum number of. parking -spaces required for the use after deducting'the area used for storage: Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions.in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that'the storagge area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or-on public streets adjacent to the site: The .site plan shows. a-trash enclosure on the .north 'side of the site with -adequate area for recyclable 'storage. The storage area -is screened by :a masonry : wall, but the height has not been specified.' By showing this height meeting- the minimum ;six.foot_ height on :the final construction drawings, this standard will be met. - Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall. accommodate containers, consistent with - current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials orsituated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall. be enclosed by a sight=obscuring fence wall,. or hedge at least six feet in. height. Gate openings which allow. access to.;users. -and haulers shall be provided. Gate- openings for haulers shall be a minimum "of 10 feet wide- and shall :be capable of being secured-in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the -type of materials accepted. The proposed storage area meets these standards as conditioned. FINDING: There is-insufficient detail to.establish.if the solid waste standards are met. CONDITION: Prior to site 'work, the applicant.shall add a note indicating the height of the masonry trash enclosure will be 6 feet minimum.. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Disa e - ccessible Parking: . All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking sppaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of .Oregon -Uniform .Building;:..Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces`.. shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations: Phase 1 will result in 210 spaces. According to the Oreggon Uniform Building Code, a parking facility accommodating 201-300 spaces requires .7 .ADA accessible spaces. Only 4 are shown. Phase 2 'will result in,152 total. spaces. According to the Oregon Uniform Building Code,. a parking facility accommod"ating 151-200 spaces requires '6 ADA accessible spaces. There. are no ADA spaces shown. Phase 3' will result.in 185 total spaces. According to the Oregon Uniform Building Code, a parking facility accommodating 151-200 spaces .requires 6 A accessible spaces.. Four . spaces are shown. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 20 OF 37 •4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER None of the proposed phases meets the minimum ADA parking. space requirements. This criterion has not been met. Access Drives:. With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access 'drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and.provide- maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site;. the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access.;drives shall be clearly and permanently ;marked and. defined through use of rails,.:;fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in,. accordance. with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt 'or concrete surface; and excludingg single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P., groups of two or more parking spaces shall be.served by a service drive so that no backing movements.or-other maneuvering within 'a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The parking areas will. be improved with asphalt and are designed to facilitate a forward. motion. Pedestrian safety and visual clearance has been. addressed elsewhere in this report. This criterion is satisfied. _ Loadinglunloading driveways: A driveway designed for continuous -forward ,,flow of passen er vehicles for the' purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place ' which is designed to accommodate more than -25 people at one time. The applicant has identified a loading and unloading area interior to the site -by the Phase. 2. addition.- This criterion is satisfied. Parking Lot. Striping: Except .for. single=family and duplex, residences*' any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter_shall have alt parking spaces clearly marked;, and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow-.and maintain` vehicular and pedestrian safety. The applicant has indicated that the parking lot will be striped and has indicated striping and direction arrows on the plans. This criterion has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along. the boundaries , of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided. with a wheel sto at least four inches. high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel.stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. Curbs will, function as wheel stops and are provided for this project. This criterion is satisfied. Space and Aisle. Dimensions: Table 18.765.1.. outlines the minimum dimensions for parking. The parking spaces meet the dimensional standards. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for. each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 21 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT.TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . The TDC requires 1 parking space for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The applicant has indicated that the first two phases will not expand the main sanctuary from its present 280 seats. As such 14 bicycle spaces are required. The final phase will provide seating fora maximum of 550 seats. As such 28 bicycle spaces are required. The applicant calls out'area-where bicycle parking will occur but does not specify the number. provided. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2.... The TDC requires at a.minimum,1 parking space per 3 seats in the main assembly area. The maximum parking allowed is 1 space per 1.3 seats in the main assembly area. The applicant has indicated that the first two phases will not expand the main sanctuary from its present 280 seats. As such, a minimum of 93 parking spaces are required and a maximum of 215 spaces, are allowed. The- proposal.shows 210 spaces for phase 'l and 152 spaces ,for phase 2. The final phase will provide seating for a.maximum 'of.550.seats..As such, a.minimum of 184. Parking spaces are required and a maximum of 4.23 .,spaces are allowed. .The, proposal shows 185 spaces for phase 3. While this standard is met as shown, a prior condition will require some reconfiguration to accountfor-the required handicapped spaces. This typically results in the reduction of available parking. The applicant will need to revise the site plan to account for the required parking for each phase, particularly phase-3. Off-street loading requirements: Off-street loading :spaces: Commercial, industrial and : institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material -or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering,.. space as follows: 1. A minimum-of one loading space is required for' buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or.more; 2. A minimum of two loading spaces for' buildings with 40,000 gross `square feet or .more. . Off-street.loading dimensions: 1. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location; 2. Each. loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length.*shall not be less than ' twice*the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site; 3. Entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the,City Engineer in.accordance with Chapter 18.710; 4. Screening for off-street loading facilities is required and shall be. the:..same as screening for-parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745.. The applicant notes that no loading space is necessary. However, that does not respond to the criterion. This standard is not met. FINDING: The proposal does not provide the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code. There is inadequate evidence to demonstrate compliance with the bicycle parkin requirements. Staff cannot be certain'that the parking requirements are met at the end of phase 3 construction with the .reconfiguration for . ADA parking. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 22 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITIONS: • Prior to site work; the: applicant shall revise the parking plan to comply with .the Oregon Uniform Building- Code and show seven (7) ADA accessible spaces: This number may be reduced to.6 if the total parking .,provided is fewer than 200 spaces. The. applicant shall, additionally demonstrate that the minimum parking is,provided after the appropriate number of ADA spaces are provided. • Prior to site work, the applicant shall indicate on the site plan -the number of bicycle rack spaces to be provided in each location'. Aminimum of.14 spaces are, required for phase 1. and 2, and 28 spaces are required at the completion of Phase 3. • The applicant shall, indicate on the site plan an area for a loading area. Staff suggests that the area in the Phase 2 parking, lot turnaround be. shown for this purpose. Sensitive Lands Review - Chapter 18.775 Me development site 'includes area , o drainageways, associated wetlands, and steep slopes. Development of sites that include these areas, requires review through the sensitive lands criteria as described below. Jurisdictional wetlands. tandform alterations or.developments which are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and' permit 'criteria of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, CWS, andlor other federal, state, or regional agencies, and are not designated as, significant wetlands on the City of Tigard etland -and Streams Corridors ap., do not require a sensitive lands permit -'The City shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies are obtained. All other applicable. City .requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the 1.00-year floodplain,, sloes of 25% or greater or unstable.. ground, drainageways, and wetlands which are not-under state or .federal jurisdiction... The wetlands within this site do not appear as-:significant wetlands on-the City's map, but are regulated by CWS and state agencies. A condition of approval will -b6 imposed requiring the' necessary permits from Army Corps, Division. of State . Lands, and CWS be obtained prior to commencing any work within those areas. Steep slopes. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, .,approve with con i ions or deny an appplication request for. a sensitive lands. permit. on slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground based upon findings that all of the following. criteria have been satisfied:. 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or, development will not create site, disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not .result .in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, 'or other adverse on-site and, off-site effects or hazards to.life or property; 3. The structures are appropriately sited and: designed to ensure structural stability and proper drainage of foundation and crawl space. areas for development with any of the following soil conditions:.wet/high water table; high shrink-swell capability; compressible/organic;.: and shallow depth-to- bedrock; and 4.' . Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration -or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with 'Chapter.18.745,.Landscaping and Screening. TIGARD FIRST;BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP~004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 23 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The proposed land form alteration is limited to the extent necessary to provide for the . proposed buildings and associated parking lots: The applicant has attempted to limit the land alteration by placing the roposed" parking lot parallel to the slope, but with retaining walls ranging' between 1 to 13 feet in height; it is difficult to say that anything other than mass grading is occurring on this site. However, to accommodate the proposed uses, there is not much in the way -of viable alternatives. The buildings have been placed in the flatter-.portion of. the site and will require very little earthwork to be situated on the site. The, northern parking area will be graded for continuity, but little cut and fill is required. It is the western lower parking lot that seems on its face to not comply with the intent- of these :standards. Nevertheless, based on the size of the, proposed facility, the amount of parking pro osed. is to meet minimum code standards. It is because of this required parking that the disturbance is necessary. The applicant has submitted an erosion control plan to limit sedimentation migration into the stream; and minimize the potential for ground instability. The stream buffer setback will also assist in preventing washouts or other on-site or off site adverse effects as a result of the roposal. This erosion control plan also addresses revegetation requirements for areas left are as a result.,of site grading activity. This is also ,a requirement of the CWS'Service Provider- letter. As noted previously, the buildings have been placed in the flatter portion of. the site and.will require very. little earthwork to be situated on :the site.. 'This will help :ensure that the structures are not jeopardized. -A- Geotechnical . evaluation was also submitted to demonstrate that the site has adequate soil bearing capacity for the proposal. This report found that portions of the site had fill placed on it .(generally forming the steep hillside running north=south. The report makes. very specific and 'thorough recommendations of how excavations should be made'' and. how. the foundations are. to be constructed. These recommendations will need to be incorporated into the building permit plans. _ Within draina ewa ss.. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request fora sensitive lands permit within drainageways based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration 'or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; As opposed to the previous findings regarding the general on site grading,. the grading nearest the stream resource is not so severe. Mi . nor cu s and fills of 1 to 2 feet are proposed No disturbance within the. drainageway.. is proposed to accommodate the parking lots or structures. 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation,. ground instability, or other, adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to'life or property;_ As described previously, an erosion control and grading plan will be required as,. ppart of the engineering approval process to insure that grading within the steep slope areas will not result in sedimentation or erosion, as well as avoid on or off-site adverse effects.. Furthermore, the City will require the.a plicant's engineer to submit the proposed construction plans to the geotechnica engineer for review and approval prior to. City approval of the construction plans. 3. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not, decreased; The only proposed change in the drainageway is. the lowering of an existing sewer lateral. There is inadequate information to determine the amount of earthwork required for this -activity,,but nevertheless it is a temporary impact that will result in the area being restored to native grades.. Therefore, there will.be no impact to the water flow capacity. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005)SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 24 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 4. Where, natural vegetation has been. removed due to land form alteration or . development, the areas not covered by structures-or impervious surfaces will be' replanted -to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; To address erosion concerns and removal of vegetation, the applicant will be- required to submit an erosion control plan-prior to . any grading. The applicant has shown 'on the preliminary grading plan that areas affected by landform alterations will be re-planted if not covered by structures or impervious surfaces, and isJurthermore required through the CWS service provider. letter.It should be noted that the existing sewer lateral passes beneath or near three trees (#14, 15, and 16) Removal of these trees. will require a separate tree removal application; as they are within sensitive lands areas. The applicant shall further be advised that alternate methods of constructing the line will be required to be explored to minimize or eliminate the need for tree removal before the city grants approval to remove these trees. 5. The . drainageway . will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size, to ow in accordance with . the. adopted 1981 Master . accommodate maximum flow' Drainage Plan; . The 1981 Master Drainage Plan does not identify:any public facilities for this portion of Derry Dell Creek. Moreover, there are no noted problems with drainage in this particular area. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps ~ of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of. State Lands, and CWS approvals shall be obtained; The applicant has shown approvals from Clean Water. Services,.-but has not yet obtained U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Division of State Lands approvals. Also, the CWS letter does not identify the . sanitary line work in the approved encroachments. "The-: only encroachments allowed under, this service provider letter are the parking spaces -in the southwestern portion of the property". The applicant will need to obtain explicit approval from CWS regarding the sewer line, or else revise their., plan such that no work in the buffer is required. These, approvals will be required prior to commencing any site. work. 7.- Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the.-consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to-the floodplain in accordance ' with the Comprehensive Plan.. This area shall include. portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of . a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian.. bicycle pathway, plan. There is no 100-year floodplain Within or adjacent to the proposed development. .This standard is inapplicable. FINDING: Provided the applicant complies with the following conditions, the proposal can . meet the criteria necessary to tissue a sensitive lands-permit on this particular site CONDITIONS: . • Prior to commencing any site work; the applicant shall submit revised utility'.plans that showthe specific profile for the sewer line, as it passes through the sensitive area. The applicant will need to obtain explicit. approval from CWS. regarding the sewer line work in this area, or else revise their plan such that no work in the buffer is required. If work in the buffer area is allowed, alternate methods of constructing- the' line will be required to be. explored to minimize or eliminate the need for tree removal before the city grants appproval to remove these trees.. Moreover, prior to removing any trees'in tt~e sensitive land area, a tree removal permit shall be obtained from the City. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005iSLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 25 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING•STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • Prior to the issuance of final occupancy on any buildingg', the applicant must provide City staff with a letter indicating that all of the provisions of Clean Water Services service provider lefter (#4097) have been complied with. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall .provide evidence of all necessary approvals'from 'US Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of State Lands. If no approvals are required; the applicant shall submit a, letter, stating the reasons why no approval is required. • Prior to any site work, the drainage tract must be clearly identified in the' field with permanent fencing to as to.. insure no grading or material is placed in this area. _ Any fencing that is damaged during construction must be replaced prior to final building inspection. Prior, to any site work, submit and receive approval. for'an erosion control and grading plan. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy on any building, re-plant any area where vegetation has been removed as a result . of grading in conformance'with the Clean Water. Services Standards. • prior to commencing on site improvements, the applicant shall have the geotech engineer review and approve the construction plans for the City's review and :approval: Tree Removal - Chapter 18.790 Section requires at a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by 'a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree. plan shall include. identification of ; all ' existing trees, Identification of a' program to save existing trees.or mitigate tree removal. over 12 inches 'in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and 'a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by,the 'applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided a tree survey .and plan from a certified arborist that generally describes the trees that are on the project slte.and their condition. According to the report, there are a total of thirty-three trees on site over.six inches in diameter. Eighteen trees are over 12 inches in diameter. The report identifies ten trees #1-10) that are non-viable. Three of these non viable trees are over 12 Inches in diameter (fl, 5; and 10). The applicant's-narrative-.notes that all ten of these trees are to be removed, and the' remaining 33 trees'(in fact there are only 23 trees remaining. after the 10 non-viable trees are deducted) will be retained. "This is inconsistent with the site plan shown. On that plan, some trees that have been called out for removal in the narrative are shown as retained, and more. notably, there are three trees (#28, 29, and 30) that are shown for - removal but noted to be.. retained. Previously in this 're' ort, staff identified that these three trees in the water quality area could be retained by reconfiguring or relocating.the facility. Additionally, while the, applicant has not acknowledged, or identified thew ork required for the sewer line work in the sensitive land area, a faint note on Sheet C-6 of C-6 reads 'Ex.. San. Lat. to be lowered for depth". This sewer line passes beneath two or three other trees on site. 'Trees removed in the sensitive area require separate tree removal permits, which have not yet been applied for. Using a "worst case scenario" removal of 3 of the 15 viable trees over 12" diameter 'Would .be required. This only amounts to 20% removal rate, and would not be subject, to the standard mitigation requirements. However, removal of any tree larger than 6"from a. sensitive land area requires.a permit, and must also be mitigated to ensure no net loss of canopy cover occurs. The applicant's plans. are very unclear with respect to the sanitary sewer work, Final review of this aspect of-the project will occur with a reevaluation by. CWS and through a review of any tree removal permit application. " TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 26 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER FINDING: The applicant's tree removal, plan is. inaccurate, and incomplete. CONDITIONS: • Trees in the parking lots and street trees should be native-species due to the proximity of the stream.' The applicant shall consult with the forester to determine the species to be used. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a revised, tree''removal, ppIan that clearly depicts the trees-that will be removed and:those that will be retained. The applicant shall comply with-the protection measures prescribed by the City Arboriist. The applicant shall provide the City Arborist with a construction sequence including installation' and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, .grading, and. paving. The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when -.tree protection measures are in place, so that he :may verify that the measures will . function properly prior to construction. If it is necessary . to enter the tree protection zone at any time. with equipment (trucks, bulldozers, etc.) the project arborist.and City Forester must be notified before any entry occurs. Before entering the TPZ, the project arborist and City Forester shall determine the method by which entry can occur, along with any additional tree protection `measures. • . -Prior to final building, inspection; the Project Arborist shall submit a final certification indicating the 'elements of the Tree Protection Plan were 'followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and .'viable in their modified growing environment. • Prior to issuance of building permits, Ihe,applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified. arborst. The deed restriction may .be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. . Visual Clearance Areas - Chapter '18.795: Section . states, a the provisions of this-chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on=site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.9. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole. or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb. exists, from the street center, line grade; except that trees exceeding this height may be located, in this area, provided all.branches below'. eight feet are removed. Staff was concerned. by the vision clearance`at the proposed access drive to SW Gaarde, based on the presence of the retaining wall and grade.leading to the site. There.was a - potential. that the wall would exceed 30 Inches in.height.above the travel surface. However, as staff has previously. recommended that this access not be permitted there should- be no issues with vision clearance. As for the. other proposed driveways',. there. are no proposed structures inside of the vision `clearance: area, and the "applicant has stated in the narrative and shown on the site plan, that no obstructions will be placed in the visual clearance areas. This standard is satisfied. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 27 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . FINDING: The Vision Clearance requirements are met. C. ADDITIONAL SITE. DEVELOPMENT. REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA r Section 1.8.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(1.5) provides. add itional.Site DeveloQment Review approval standards not necessarily covered by.the provisions of the,previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18:360.090.3 Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy. and Noise: Multi-family or Group Livin Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi,-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 - (100-year floodplai.n) and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The. following sections were discussed, previously in this. decision and,, therefore,' will -not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.13 (Parking); .18:360.090:12. (Landsca ing); 18.360.090.13 (Drainage);' and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for.the Disabled); 188.360.090.15 (Provisions of the underlying zone). Com liance with all of the a licable re uirements of this title-including Chapter 18.810 street an i i Standards: As discussed in this report; all applicable sections. have been addressed and where the proposal is.deficient, staff has recommended conditions to ensure compliance'. . Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and' natural drainage where possible based upon existing site. conditions; located in areas not subject. to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between . adjoining buildings for adequate light,.air circulation, and fire-fighting; and'oriented wi h. consideration for sun and wind. Trees. shall be preserved. to the extent possible: Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 1.8.790, Tree Removal. The applicant's plan with regard. to the placement of buildings is the most: sensible and responsive to the site. Utilizing the difference in topographyy,to accommodate a bi-level multi ppurpose ggymnasium with vehicular and pedestrian access both above and below is creative. "The buileings are clustered at the corner for a stronger presence on the street, and maintain ample distance from the creek. drainage: Also, -their placement and orientation will take advantage of southern solar exposures. Trees, have been previously, addressed elsewhere in this report. -No buildings or structures are proposed'that will hinder air circulation, or prevent fire-fighting personnel from performing their fobs. This criterion has been met. Buffering, screening, and compatibility between adjoining uses: Buffering shall be provided between different types of rand uses and decreased noise levels, air pollution, visual barrier, .on site screening of service areas storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical. devices on.roof tops shall be considered in determining the intensity of the buffer or screen. As discussed previously, in this, report the site is.separated from residential .uses by rights-of- way..on the south and east, and the large Arainage to the west. The proposed site plan also leaves ample room between the houses along the northern portion of the site and the. parking area. There are no requirements to provide any., buffers or screening aside from the required landscaping and screening that have been discussed previously in this report. This criterion is satisfied TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 28 OF 37 4125/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Crime Prevention and Safety: Windows shall be located so that areas. vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; Interior' laundry and service areas. shall be located in "a way that they can be observed by others; Mail- boxes shall be located in lighted areas, having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; . The exterior lighting levels shall . be selected . and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and Light fixtures .shall be provided in areas having, heavy pedestrian or` 'vehicular traffic and in potentially dangBrous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures, shall be placed at a he" ht so that light patterns overlap at a height, of seven. feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant has -not shown a lighting plan, nor has he addressed.-the criteria of this section. Staff is unable to make findings with regard to these issues. The crime prevention standards have not. been fully met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing•for transit if the development ppropposal is adjacent to existing or, proposed transit route; the requirements for transit . facilities shall be based on: the location of other.transit facilities in the area; and' the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review:, bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. . The site is 800 feet from the nearest bus' line. Sidewalks are present- between the site and SW Pacific Highway. This criterion is satisfied. FINDING:,. The proposal fails to address lighting as .''required by the -TDC. Section 18.360.090(10). CONDITION: Prior to.issuing building permits for any phase, the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan that shows no ppro ectlon 'off site and complies. with crime. prevention requirements of the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). The applicant shall additionally ensure that such lighting is.shielded to avoid off-site glare as required by TDC 18.725. . D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810. Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards 'for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as. streets, sewers-, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements:. Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within 'a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states.that any new street -or additional street width-planned as a portion of an existing street'shall be dedicated and .improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths:. Section 18.810.030.E 'requires -a neighborhood route street to have, a 54-foot right-of-way, width : and 32-foot paved section. Other- improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm.drainage, and.street trees. This.site lies adjacent to-SW Gaarde Street and SW 110th Avenue. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/sLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 29 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE'HEARINGS OFFICER ' ' This site lies adjacent to SW Gaarde Street, which is classified,as a.'3=lane Arterial on the . City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At. present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant-should .dedicate the additional RW to provide 38 feet from centerline. SW Gaarde is currently improved. In order to.mitigate the impact from this develoment, the applicant should install street trees and remove the existing driveway, replacing if with, curb and sidewalk. Minimum Rights=of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Neighborhood Route (local street) to have a 54 -foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved ...,.section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground. utilities; street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 110th, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan.Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to.the most recent tax assessor's map. No additional ROW dedication is required. SW 110th is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate. the impact from this development, the applicant should construct half-street improvements.. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030:N states that grades shall. not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access . streets may have segments with grades up . to. 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii. of curves. shall be as determined by the City Engineer. ' The existing roads do not exceed 9%, thereby meeting this criterion. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors:. Section A8.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing -or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design. shall provide adequate protection or residential properties. and shall separate residential. access. and through traffic, or if separation is .not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following- A parallel:access street along the arterial or major collector; Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or-major collector to- provide adequate buffering with frontage along.another street;. Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in-a non-access reserv ation along the arterial or mayor collector; or Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives .of, this subsection; If a lot has.'access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. This development has access to two streets with different classifications. The existing and. proposed driveways.on Gaarde Street, which is the higher classification street (Arterial), do not meet the Access Management standards of 18.705.03,9.H and staff has recommended they be denied. This would leave two driveways on 110t Avenue that meet the Access management standards and provide primary access in compliance with this standard. Block Designs -.Section 18.81.0.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of•limitations and opportunities- of topography. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 30 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Block Sizes: Section 18:810.040.13.1. states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: Where street' location is.precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing developmentor; For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. For non-residential blocks in . which internal public circulation provides. . equivalent access. The site is adjacent to an Arterial. street; therefore this standard does not apply. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections'on public . easements or, right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is - not . possible. Spacing between connections shall be no- more than 330 feet, except where precluded, by environmental or topographical constraints, *..existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. There is a bicycle/pedestrian path easement on the site, which presumably was required to meet a similar requirement. Completion of this pathway would provide a suitable connection; however, staff acknowledges that -there are environmental and topographic constraints present that may make this infeasible. If the applicant decides to revise the easement, then -Me shall be responsible for constructing the portion of the pathway that has been relocated. Lots - Size, and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot -deppth from being more than 2.5 times the average -lot width, unless the. parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. , No lots are being created or altered by this proposal. . Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement In cases where the lot ' ' is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15, feet. The site has greater than 25 feet on public street frontages. Sidewalks: '.Section 18.810.070:A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both 'sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial, streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There are existing sidewalks on Gaarde Street and'. a portion of the frontage along 110th Avenue. The applicant's plays indicate they will be constructing half=street improvements for the remainder' of their, 110 Avenue frontage., These improvements include.. sidewalks, thereby meeting this criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A: requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by*Clean Water. Services in 1996 and ,including, any future revisions or .amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.C states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by. the Comprehensive Plan. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004=00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005=00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 31 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The. applicant's plans indicate they will be lowering the existing sewer•lateral that serves this site. I he applicant's engineer shall confirm that .the existing sewer.lateral is adequate in size to serve all future development. Because the work to lower the line will take place..in the creek and associated buffer areas the applicant must obtain the necessary approvals to work in this area. The connection to main is-required to be included in the PFI application. Storm Drainage. General Provisions: Section '18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.010.100.C states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall- approve the :necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and, Surface Water Management (as. adopted by Clean Water Services in. 2000 and . including any. future revisions or amendments). . There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development. Effect on Downstream Drainage:_. . Section .18.810.100.D states that. where it -is anticipated by the City Engineer . that the additional, runoff 'resulting from the .development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions . have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction ,Standards for Sanitary and -Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including.any future revisions or amendments). In 1997 Cleam Water Services (CWS) completed a -basin study of Fanno Creek, and adopter( the, Fanno Creek .Watershed Management Plan.. 'Section, V of that plan includes . a recommendation. that local: governments institute a stormWater detention/effective impervious area reduction pro ram resulting in no net increase in storm 'peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City. will require, that all new developments.resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities; unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's engineer has submitted calculations,for detention. The impervious surface areas used for the calculations do not match the Site Area summary provided on Sheet Al. The areas are approximately 5% different. Prior to construction, the applicant's engineer shall submit revised calculations for review and approval. Bikeways and-Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted- pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include. provisions for the future extension of -such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. o • 110th Avenue is not classified as a bicycle facility. Gaarde. Street is classified as a bicycle facility., The recent City project provided bicycle striping on SW Gaarde, therefore this criterion is met... Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines; but not limited to• those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services. and.related facilities shall be placed underground, except ,for : surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities: during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 32 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • . The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to. pprovide the underground services; location of all surface mounted facilities; The City reserves the right to approve All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer,, shall. be constructed - prior to, the surfacing of .,.the streets; and Stubs for service. con n6ctions shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made.. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810:120.C• states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu. of under-grounding "costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of -under-grounding the utilities•.outweighs . the :benefit of under- rounding in'con unction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. We. most common, but not. the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result.in the placement of additional poles, rather ;than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which. are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding: There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 110th Avenue. If the fee in- lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal .foot of street frontage that contains . the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 600 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $21.,000:00. ADDITIONAL, CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS . WITH'' -STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTSTANDARDS: Traffic.Stud Findin s: ra is na ysis eport, dated April 2004, was -prepared by Charbonneau Engineering for this development: Driveway Spacing: The driveways (existing and pro osed) on 110th Avenue- meet the spacing standards of 18.705.030.1-1. The, driveways existing and proposed) on Gaarde . Street do not meet the standards of 18.705.030.H. This section of the Development Code wasthdiscussed earlier. in this report with,.,staff recommending approval of. the driveways on 110 Avenue and denial of the drivewayson Gaarde Street: Left Turn. Warrants: The engineer's analysis indicates that left turn warrants *are not met with the project build out. Traffic Signal Warrants: The report indicates that with the low peak hQ_ur traffic volumes, . signalization is not warranted at the intersection of Gaarde Street and.110 Avenue. Capacity Analysis: The report indicates that the study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service after the proposed expansion of this project. Public Water S stem: The i y o Tigard provides water service in this area: The applicant's plans indicate they will be using an existing domestic service and Fire Department Connection (FDC). The applicant's plans for the PFI application shall include any additional water work proposed. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 33 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Storm Water Quality- The i as agreed to. enforce Surface- Water. Management. (SWM) , regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in. 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from. newly created impervious surfaces.. In addition', a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in. keeping,the. facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations fora water quality facility that Will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. The calculations shall be revised to reflect the. actual impervious areas, as there is a discreppancy between the calculations and the Site Area summary provided on the plan Sheet .A1. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Clean Water_ Services design- and construction standards,. the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at.signifcant stages throughout1he project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor with written confirmation' that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and) specifications.. Gradin and Erosion Control: esi n an ons ruc ion Standards also regulate erosion control to. reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, excavating, clearing, .and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per WS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control. plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires.` that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination . System (NPDES), erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over one acre, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site. and/or building permit. Site Permit Required: The app ican is required to obtain a Site Permit from.the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm,. etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to approval of the final plat. Address Assi nments: The City o igar is responsible for,assi ping addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary ~USB). An addressing fee in the amount-'of $50.00. Pee address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. E. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040. a states that the applicant shall provide. an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, pu lic facilities systems, and affected private property users. - In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 34 OF 37 .4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER, The applicant has submitted an impact study addressing the required elements above. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY. ANALYSIS Based on . a transportation impact study . prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development.. Presently, the TIF for the entire roject is estmated'at $23,976 (including estimated credits for the demolition of Bolt Hall). T~ese numbers increase by P%. annually, and are subject tochange as determined at building permit submittal. Since, the Washington County. TIF only mitigates for 32 percent of a project's im act,. 68 percent is unmitigated.. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the transportation system .can be ' determined by the following. equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June 1995TIF=0.32 = 1.00% of the total Impact. $23,976 divided by 032 equals .$74,925.' Since the `TIF will (mitigate for a portion of this impact, it is subtracted from. the total (74,925-23,976=$50,949): Therefore, the value of ithe required exactions should be roughly proportionate to,this. remaining $50,949: Less miti ated costs esl es 't e -1 IF that mitigates for 32%'of the projects impact on' the transportation system, ..the applicant, is .required to dedicate additional right-of=way along SW Gaarde Street (2,504 square feet). The estimated :value. of the dedication is three dollars- a square foot for a total value, of $7,12. The applicant is also required to complete an approximate 230 foot section of SW 110. with the installation of curb, sidewalk, partial.,:pavement and street tree improvements. The.remainder of the frontage is already complete. At an approximate cost. of $150 per lineal foot the improvements are valued at $34,500. Estimated Value of Im acts u m act 74 $ p ,925 Less TIF Assessment . ' - _$23,976 Less Mitigated Costs 442,012 Estimated Value o Unmitigated Impacts. FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the unmitigated impacts exceed the costs of the conditions imposed. and, therefore, the conditions are roughly proportional and justified. - SECTION VIII: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS'.. The City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and expressed no concerns or objections. : ' ' The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal, for ":review and the comments have.been incorporated into this report. The City of Tigard Arborist was sent this proposal and offered the following comments and recommendations: 1.. Trees in the parking lots and street trees should be native species due to the proximity of the stream. 2. If it is nece 'sa to enter the tree protection zone at any time-.with equipment (trucks, bulldozers, etclefore the project arborist and City Forester must be notified before any entry occurs.. entering the TPZ, the project arborist and City Forester shall . determine the method. by which entry can occur, along with any additional tree protection measures. 3., Prior to final building inspection, the, Project Arborist shall submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and 'viable in their modified growing environment. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE,35 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 4, Prior to.commencing site:,work, the applicant shall submit cash or other security for the equivalent value of mitigation, required (number of caliper inches times' •$125. per callper-inch). If additional trees.are preserved through-the subdivision improvements and construction of houses, and are properly protected through these stages by the same measures afforded to other protected trees on site, the amount of cash or other security may be correspondingly reduced. Any trees planted on the site or off site in accordance with 18.790.060 (D) will be credited against the cash or.other security; for two years following final plat approval. Aftersuch time, the applicant shall pay the remaining balance as a fee in lieu of planting. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits: the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction 'to the effect' that any existing tree greater than' 12" diameter may be removed only' if the tree dies or is hazardous according to' a certified arborist. The deed restriction _:may be removed 'or will be considered invalid if a tree -preserved in. accordance with this decision'sh'ouldeither die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 6. Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant shall submit construction drawings that include the approved Tree Removal, Protection and Landscape Plan. The. plans shall also include a construction. sequence including installation and removal of tree . protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. Only those trees identified on. the approved Tree Removal plan are authorized for removal by this. decision.- 7. Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees- to be retained. The applicant shall allow access by the Ci Forester for the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to veri that . the. tree protection measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow he plan,- or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be processed. 8. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant' shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Forester, .at least, once every two weeks, from initial tree. protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation, through. site work, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. These reports should include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection. fencing. If the amount of TPZ.was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify. that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall, long-term health and stability of the tree(s).. If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Forester at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ.s or the Tree Protection Plan is not' being followed by the contractor, the City can stop work on the.project until an inspection can be done by. the City Forester and the Project Arborist. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if the, fencing -was moved at any point during construction, and determine if, any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. 9.1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings -indicating the location of the trees that were preserved "on the lot, location of tree protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the pro. ect arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structure. All proposed . protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction; and shall remain in place through the duration construction. After approval from the City Forester, the tree protection measures may be removed. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE' 36 OF 37 4/25105 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE.HEARINGS OFFICER 1• ent of Fish a Gas, CO MMEN e' Oregon Depa im Natural Ment AGENCY X• Fire and R General Sian opportunity to . COM ,CT1ON 1 Tualatln V insalley ets; portNaere all prQvIded ices . of -Eng Qwest can WaUS A my CableSTri-Nietl and ` lildlife, Com 'ast erizon, do 'so . end did'nat y A ri118 ZQp5 SATE A - • R D BY ~ As 9oc~ate Planner . . . . - . p, ril 2005- , pATE - - 6Y : Richard ana9er . • APPROVED piannin~ - . PAGE l pF 3 1R2005-00006NA~005-00016 . 00050L ~ ER 000515 URG~.EXPANT SHE HEAR'NGS p f1RST BAPTISM STAFF REPGR 'r1GAR ~,a►_IG HSAR I F- CITY of - . - - ti FAIRHAVEN ° GE O G R AP NIC INFORMATION STSTE. FAIRHA ST VICINITY MAP CUP2004-.00005. - ~ - > AIRHAVEN SLR2005-00005 SLR2005-00006 VAR2005-00016 V N GA DEN PARK PL TIGARD. FIRST. BAPTIST CHURCH'-EXPANSION Q 4 SF FD - - - ~ BULL F.fi Yt J . - .-----gEffeELA GAARDE - ST ' Tigard Area Map A - 0 100 200 300 Feet 1t 251 feet 'City of Tigard information on this map is for general location only and _ shoutd be verified with the Development Services Division. - _ 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 039.4171 - - htlpl/www.ci.tigard.or~us Community Develooment Plot date: Mar 30, 2005; CAmagic\MAGIC03.APR N 10 ANSI. w O, 4 .mot' e 1p. 1 .1 y. 1 A, _ l1 ¢ of _ - 1 a m 1. ''2,~~:t 1 I_ _ $ ~ 3 sw ti, STREET . ~ Rpg i p5 & 61VARZp05-pt • ' ppp051SLR2p05-p00 tup2ppa- CH GF TIGARD GAS ~ ST. gpPT1ST CHuR of- FAR EXHIBIT B Recommended Text Amendment to Condition Number 30, Casefile CUP2004-00005, Tigard First Baptist Church Expansion. Original Text: 30.. The existing driveway on Gaarde shall be removed prior to final inspection on Phase 1. Recommended Amendment: 30. The existing driveway on Gaarde shall be removed prior to final inspection on Phase 1. 'A restricted emergency accessfrom SW G'aarde Street to the lower parking area shall be constructed if required by Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue. Appropriate measures (e.g. knox box locked gate) shall be incorporated to prevent general public use of this access. ATTACHMENT 2 APPEAL. FILING FORIV! g - 21, FOR LAND .USE DEC1SIO C)Ff•°o~s'~ ° ` CITY OF TIGARD .13125 SW Nall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4179 FAX: (503) 684-7297 The City of Tigard supports the citizen's right to participate in local government: Tigard's Land Use Code, therefore, sets out specific requirements for filing appeals on certain land use decisions. The following formbas been developed to assist you In"fling an appeal of a•land use decision in proper form. To determine what filing -fees will be required or to answer any questions you have regarding the appeal process, please contact the Planning Division or the City Recorder at the phonetfax listed at the top of this form. GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Property Address/Location(s) and Name(s) of the Case No.(s): LtkR 00 (4o0o y 5 Application Being Appealed:_ 11075 SW Gaarde Street. Case Name(s): dtlP 2004-00005: SLR 2005-OOOOSu -00006; VAR 7005-011 a6 Receipt Na: a o~ 5 -Aja (o ~1, How Do You Qualify As A Party?: Owner/Applicant Application Accepted BY: C Date: ~~2J5 05 Approved As To Form By: L Appellant's Address: 11075 SW Gaarde Street Date: ,~131~oS City/State: Tigard,' OR 97223 Denied As To Form By- Day Phone Where You Can Be Reached:(503 6 31- 3°113 Date: Scheduled Date Decision Is To Be Final: May 27 2005 Rev. imos Kcurpinlmasterstrevrseftppeai.doc Date Notice of Final Decision Was Given: May. 112,'2005 Specific Grounds-l.or Appeal or Review: This appeal i s REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS based on the denial by the Hearings Officer of a Special Adjustment to Access and Application Elements Submitted: Filing Form (completed) Egress Standards in VAR 2005 .00016. The (,Appeal ilingFee(basedoncriteriabelow) applicant sought an adjustment to permit a DinwWrsDedsiontoPtannbvCo wr aston. S 250.00 ] > Expedited Ftmer, (deposit) S 300.00 > Headng Referee s on Gaarde Street within ? ^s commissiotwteartruysrmccestocity 2,314.00 new access point Traasa' nscr' t the 600-foot minimum driveway-street .separation from the intersection with 110th (s) of Appellant(s): Avenue. required by TDC 9 18.705.030-.H.3. The nrnpnced driveway was to be located.220 feet west of the 110th Avenue intersection. APPEAL FILING FORM'FOR LAND USE DECISIONS (Cont.'cf.) The Hearings Officer misconstrued the 'appl i cabl e 1 aw, TDC § 18.370-4.5, when he concluded that the ."appl i cant failed to bear the burden of proof that the application complies with TDC 18.370.020.C(5)(b)(2) and (4) because adequate alternative -access.,is available to the site from SW 110" Avenue. The additional traffic and congestion . . . will not create a hazard There is no substantial 'evidence to the•co.ntrary." Hearings Officer Final Order at 7. The Heari ngs Officer then went on to fi nd "The, appl i cant* i s required to modify the intersectionlof 110th Avenue,and Gaarde Street] if necessary to provide adequate-sight distance. Inadequate sight distance at this intersection will create a 'hazard and additional traffic [at this intersection] generated by the proposed development: will"exacerbate the hazard." Id. at 8. The Hearings Officer, at the same time, found that•"the applicant should be requi.red to provide an emergency vehicle access to Gaarde Street if,required by the Tualatin Valley..Fire District." Id. The.decision of the-Hparings Officer failed to balance the approval criteria in TDC 18.370-4.5.b(2) and b(4) with the standard i.n TDC §.18.370-4.5.b(5).. The.110th Avenue access alone is an "alternative.access point:" Subsection b(2)'. •Thus,.the•Gaarde Street access (the proposed adjustment) is not "the minimum adjustment required." Subsection b(4).,..However, subsection b(4) also requires that minimum adjustment to be "adequate.".,Subsection b(5) requires the approved access (110th Avenue, only), to be "safe." The 110th Avenue access alone was found by the.Hearings Officer to be.a "hazard." Only' with the adjustment of a Gaarde Street driveway,is access to the site "adequate," because access is "safer," or less of a-"hazard." The Hearings Officer's decision also is inconsistent with the purpose of Chapter 18.705 for "safe and efficient vehicle.access and egress~o•n a site.. TDC § 18.705`.01O.A. 0514-001.APP 'DAV0,13: SMITH ATTORNEY AT LAW .6950 S.W. HAMPTON ST., SUITE 232. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 APPELLATE LITIGATION LAND USE TELEPHONE (503) 624-9352 ZONING & PLANNING FACSIMILE (503) 598-3028 - PROPERTY RIGHTS E MAIL attyd_smith®hotmail.com CITY OF TIGARD 5/25/2005 13125 SW Hall Blvd 3:21:59PM Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 Receipt 27200500000000002362 Date: 05/25/2005 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid CUP2004-00005 [LANDUS] Appeal PC/HO-Council 1,00-0000-438000 2,016.00 CUP2004-00005 [LRPF] LR Planning Surcharge 100-0000-438050 298.00 Line Item Total:, " - $2,314.00 .Payments: Method Payer User ID AcctJCheck No. Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Check" FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF . CAC 8043 In Person 2,314.00 TIGARD _ Payment Total: : $2,314.00 FIRST-botIST.CHURCH:OF..T:IG'ARD K~Y~ANKNATIONAGASSOCKTION'. 8 43. • 11075 SW,:GAARg:E.STREET:.: ° T16ARQ, OR ;97224 3720.:..... KeYBank ' :.PH: (503)'639-3 13 2d ZOtlt23o; . 2 a PAY TO THE_City.of T.1ga1d: **2,314.00 m ORDER OF Two ThousandThree:Hundred.Fourteen and 00%100**************************************** DOLLARS-2 : U MEMO: 00080L, 311' 1: 1 2 300 20 10: 37009 100 12 9 L, cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 r ATTACHMENT 3 RECEIVED PLANNING .10 2005 MAY May 9, Zoos : CITY OF TIGARD l Mr. Joe Turner ~~ie:.hecord ae ~r Hearing Officer' City of Tigard 125;. SW Hall Blvd. Ti ard;-OR;•97223~~ RE..VAR . :ku P:~ nF:k .a 4~ .....a ...:~:':~.e::P..: n....3.:::.~ `!:E'~:, '?.lade:':=:;. . k'. ' Dear.Mr. Turner..:: , . R W.? Even thongh you :have;already<recewed onr written>.final: a. umeIIts ;;wanted: to forward this letteret*" with the hope that you would consfder'yt prior taymaking . e, c . r, .r ~d"x' `:,,..-z_P^<.yx:;r_„^<.. ""~k.r.. ,,.••k.; `x:': "a ':"s`::':.~::,'.: your decisio.: .n'onou`raccess-to~SWGaardea,Sfreet:q 1~E F~ 3 3 Please note'theigh lighted sentence,m paragraph #2 ;It 'would°appear that`from a - . n.. :::t:'.`~.'.., .•:.~:~.:..-...:.<:~,'.::>':;.~..,..`~::;:";...,...~~~t ..>n.,,._~:~^_a ,:EZfire safety,aud;;emergency Vehicle standpoint our; requested open access to r Gaarde Street is alsoreferred by the Tualat►n Valley Fire &Re3cue team ` a t x.~F Y would=£appreciate:;it~ifyou could'take;this'intovon.81 eta'tion4hen male our ~c3 4 erel a , F jai Ex . , ..i L .Y... • Jim:;. , it +.a:r..r.:,..< W. sou.. . Owners R eresentahve : P TIGAR'D,FIRST BAPTIST ,CHURCH z , k . . - . . ; tg`;a fi't':;.i x ,Ai h: i Av, 'a 0 nil' P. j: . 684A 955 gracep TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE SOUTH. DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS FIRE PREVENTION, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue May 4, 2005 Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd ,Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Tigard. First Baptist Church Dear Morgan, Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development project. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue endorses this proposal predicated on the following criteria and conditions of approval: 1) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than.150 feet. The proposal was submitted appears to provide access to within 150' of all portions of all buildings. it Is noteworthy that-the existing access from Gaarde St was reconstructed due to improvements to Gaarde St, and is too steep to allow entrance by all Fire District apparatus. .2) DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. The proposed new parking area located to the West of the buildings will need to have access to Gaarde due to the "remoteness" requirement found in Condition #5 below. GThe.,Fire Distrlctwould prefer that this-parking area'be providedwith an-opewaccess to Gaarde. An access with a locked gate would also be acceptable If a gate is installed and locked, it shall be provided with'a Knox brand lock and meet the requirements of Condition # 10 below. r 3) ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS - COMMERCIAL: Where buildings exceed 30 feet in. height or, three stories in height shall have at least three separate.means of fire apparatus access. Buildings or facilities having a gross area of more than 62,000 square feet shall be provided with at least two . separate means of fire apparatus access. Buildings up to 124,000 square feet provided with fire sprinklers may have a single access. 4) AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet.in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with approved fire apparatus access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located within the aerial fire apparatus access roadway. 'Fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet in the immediate vicinity of any building or portion of building more than 30 feet in height. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a.maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. . 5) REMOTENESS: Where two access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half 'of the length of. the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. 6) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 75,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight).. You may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. 7) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 28 feet and 48 feet respectively, measured from the same center point. 8) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted red and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at approved intervals. Lettering shall have a stroke of.not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shali be white on red background. 9) GRADE: Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed 10 percent. Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%) with the exception of crowning for water run-off. When fire sprinklers are installed, a maximum grade of 15% may be allowed. The approval of fire sprinklers as an alternate shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of ORS 455.610(5). 10) GATES: Gates securing fire apparatus roads shall comply with all of the following: Minimum unobstructed width shall be 16 feet, or two 10 foot sections with a center post or island. Gates serving one- or two-family dwellings shall be a minimum of 12 feet in width. Gates shall beset back at,minimum of 30 feet from the intersecting roadway. Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type Manual operation shall be capable by one person Electric gates shall be equipped with a means for operation by fire department personnel Locking devices shall be approved. `11) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall, not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM)•or.the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less as calculated using IFC, Appendix B. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the.Fire Marshal's Office. 12) FIRE HYDRANTS - COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS:. Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. This distance maybe increased to 600 feet for buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 13) FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: The minimum number and distribution of fire hydrants available to a building shall not be less than that listed in Appendix C, Table C 105.1. Considerations for alacina fire hydrants may be as follows':' • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved. Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants. • _ Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants unless approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets only as approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number.of hydrants only if approved by the fire code official. 14) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. 15) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shalt be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In. case that there is no center, line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly 16) FIRE HYDRANT/FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: Afire hydrant shall be located within 100 feet of a fire department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. FDCs shall normally be remote except when approved by the fire code official. 17)'ACCF4S AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the'site. : 18) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. Please'contact me at (503) 612-7010 with any additional questions. Sincerely, ~iic `l. /l7C,Nlti~ , • , Eric T. McMullen DeputyFire Marshal ATTACHMENT 4 May 2, 2005 -Mr. Joe Turner, Hearing Officer City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RECEIVED-PLANNING RE: CUP 2004-00005 MAY 0 2 2005 SLR 2005=00005 SLR 2005-00006 CITY OF TIGARD VAR 2005-00016 Dear Mr. Turner: We appreciate the opportunity to offer.this closing argument for your approval of our variance/adjustment request to continue our access to SW Gaarde Street. ARCHliiCT-LA Pc For 20 years the Church has dispersed traffic into the street system using. both SW 110` Avenue and SW Gaarde Street. It doesn't seem right that the only way we can continue using our existing access is to not build anything. Tigard First Baptist Church has experienced the same pressure of growth as the neighborhood and respectfully requests to be allowed to respond to that growth in a way that works for the Church, the neighborhood and the City of Tigard. It is our understanding that the only issue that needs further input is this issue of access onto SW Gaarde. To that end, we asked Frank : Charbonneau, our traffic engineer, to revisit his report and specifically, address the adjustment criteria to see if.,the data supports approval,. We believe it does.and have attached a'copy of his memorandum, dated April 27, 2005, for your consideration. Any closure of the existing access would take place during Phase 2 and after its relocation west. We also highlight for your consideration the preap notes given us at' our meeting with the City on February'17, 2004. -A copy is in -your packet but also included here for easy reference: On the second page under access the minimum number of accesses required were three, two on SW 110` C 24' plus one on SW Gaarde @ 40.' At the time, we were1ophig to have two entries-onto SW :Gaarde but the City. restricted us to one. In an'effort to work with the City we have proceeded for a year with that understanding. We did not know access was going to be recommended for denial until the staff report was issued Simply, traffic today and traffic after our project is built that turns west . directly onto SW Gaarde Street should not be'required to exit throuh aos se Sherman s+. the neighborhood via SW' 110` Avenue, the intersection of SW 110` & Portland, OR 97214 503- 231- 1 122 Voice 503- 231- 0317 FOX' SW Gaarde and then turn west past the same point of entry we currently use. Traffic traveling east on SW Gaarde should also be able to access the church site by turning left from the new left turn lane, without adding to the traffic at the intersection with SW 110`x. We feel that in order to arrive at a fair and equitable decision you need to be .aware of other. recent exceptions to the 600' rule. We can take you to another site just west of ours that added a second driveway onto SW Gaarde and kept the existing as well. Neither of these accesses meet the 600' rule from an intersection. During the construction of improvements on SW Gaarde, the Church was also told that a new access point would be constructed as far' west of the existing access as possible.. We understand that some modification of the new retaining wall was made to accommodate the access. As construction of our frontage proceeded the existing access was reconstructed but not to the new standards. Construction of the new access was ignored. We respectfully, request equal consideration in this process. We want to emphasize the majority of traffic from our site takes place on Sunday mornings and not at the peak times Monday through Friday. This is a good integration of our traffic into the street system. If full approval is still not possible; we will accept conditions on our access in a good faith effort to work with the City of Tigard for a mutually beneficial design solution. We look forward to a favorable response and to your approval of our Conditional Use, Sensitive Lands Permits and adjustment. It is difficult to overturn a specific staff recommendation but feel we'have provided sufficient data to help the City do the right thing, in this:case, for all . Parties. Thank you. Sincerely, t AIA applicant •LA im Wilson, Owner; representative. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH CHARBONNEAU FNG G UC RECEIVED PLANNING MAY 0 2 2005 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD Date: April 27, 2005 To: Larry Abell email: Lar architectLa.com Architect LA 805 SE Sherman Street . Portland. OR 97214 From: Frank Charbonneau, •P.E. , Subject: Gaarde Street Access Justification FLO5118 Tigard First Baptist Church This memorandum responds to the City of Tigard's Staff Report to the Hearings Officer (hearing date 4/25/05) in which the staff recommended denial of the access spacing adjustment: Section 18.370 of the City's code specifies the 'criteria for adjustments to the access standards that. are being considered with the application. For convenience the criterion from Section 18.370.5 are repeated below with the corresponding response that supports the proposed church access on Gaarde Street as illustrated on the development site plan (reference attached Figure `b', site plan previously submitted with traffic study). Adjustment to access and egress standards (Chapter 18.705) a. In all zoning districts where access and egress drives cannot be readily designed . to, conform to Code standards within a particular parcel, access with an adjoining -property shall be considered. If access in conjunction with another parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, the Director may grant an adjustment to the. access requirements of Chapter 18.705.through a Type II procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.030 using.approval criteria contained in Subsection 2b below. b. The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the. access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: (1) It is not possible to share access; Response to criteria b(1): The church development plan proposes to close the existing assess on Gaarde Street that is located 80 feet (measured near edge to near edge) west of SW 110"' Avenue. The new access will be positioned at a point 219 feet west of 110"' Avenue. Due to,the site's characteristics it is not possible to provide a shared access with the adjacent property to the west considering the 20-foot wide City bike path easement and the wetland boundary located along the western-most margin of the church property. Therefore, it is not possible to establish a shared access on Gaarde Street with the adjacent property owner. (2) There are, no other alternative access. points on the street in question or from another street, Response to criteria b(2): The church property is configured as a long rectangular shape with the north/south dimension exceeding 600 feet. Consequently the on-site 9370 SW Greenberg Road,'Suite 411, Portland, OR 97223 _ ' Phone: (503) 293-1118, Fax: (503) 293-1119, traffic circulation patterh will necessitate access to both adjacent streets. Without an access on Gaarde: Street the. site will contend with an extremely long dead-end driveway., segment. A review of the site plan, reflects that the driveway length from the south end of the parking lot to the nearest access point (northerly driveway) on 110"' Avenue will total 765 feet. The distance from the'south end,bf the parking lotto the second (south ' driveway) on 110"' Avenue will total 985 feet.' From a functional and traffic safety standpoint the site needs to,.rely on " . , access to-both adjacent streets. Implementation of the proposed access plan will minimize the traffic impacts to the surrounding neighborhood ' and provide the best circulation plan for emergency vehicles. Without the Gaarde Street access there will be several detriments. ' The traffic study projected that a total of 213 vehicles will use the Gaarde Street access dur ing the Sunday peak hour, when the church seivices occur. Without direct access to Gaarde Street these trips and the corresponding turning.' movements will need to occur.at the 110 Avenue intersection; resulting in additional impacts.to the. intersection " and 1.10"' Avenue. . Site users will experience longer delays in accessing the site without the opportunity to disperse traffic directly onto. Gaarde Street. ' Emergency. vehicles will need. to undertake a longer, route in accessing the site and4here is always a possibility that the long driveway may become obstructed at a critical time, further delaying an emergency,vehicle. The.residential.neighborhood located east•and north of the site will experience additional.trafficcirculation and impacts. ` (3) The access separation requirements cannot be met Response to criteria b(3): According to the City's access code the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be•600 feet.' The site's frontage along „ Gaarde Street measures 334 feet so this standard cannot be met. . However, the development plan does propose locating the Gaarde Street driveway at the greatest possible.separationdistance from •110"' Avenue. Due to the City bike easement and adjoining wetland boundary the driveway will.be established at the.greatest separation distance (219 feet). This represents 'an improvement compared to the current driveway . on. Gaarde Street that occurs at a distance of 80 feet from 11Ave. In spite of the recent upgrading on, Gaarde Street from, two lanes to. three lanes the City has maintained several other driveways along Gaarde Street that do not meet the minimum access spacing standard. For instance the driveways.to the.'Jolene Apartments and the Park Wood ; Court-Apartments are located on the south, side of Gaarde Street within 200 feet of 110"' Avenue. Additionally, the separation between the two public. streets.(110"' Avenue and 112 Avenue) is less, than the 600 foot spacing standard. (4) The request is the-'minimum adjustment re quired to provide adequate access; t Response to criteria b(4): Only'one site access.to Gaarde Street is proposed 'with this project.. It ' will replace the existing church driveway that is located within 100 feet of Charbonneau Gaarde Street Access Justification April 28, 2005 ,Gnninnnrinn l 1 f` Tiaar/i-Riret Rantict r'hnrrh M 1 1l1t' A., 1(:a arAP Ct 1:1e Avenue. This de.sign,,is considered the minimum improvement to provide , adequate site access and is essential for the safety and the traffic circulation needs described in the response.to criteria•b(2). (5) The approved access or access approved, with. conditions will result in. a safe access; Response-to criteria b(5):, The traffic analysis`report has documented'that,the proposed access to Gaarde Street will serve 59 exiting and 154 entering trips during the : f Sunday peak hour. The resulting service level will be LOS..'B' during the Sunday peak hour. On weekdays the access will,operate at LOS `B' during the AM and PM peak hours with 60 trips in the morning peak hour and 14 trips, in the afternoon peak hour. . . Gaarde Street has recently been improved to incorporate a center left. turn lane that will provide sufficient storage for.eastbound vehicles. turning left into the proposed access on. Gaarde Street. Intersection sight distance at the proposed access point on Gaarde ; Street will'exceed the AASHTO'requirements. To the east over 850 feet of sight distance is available 'and to the west 475 feet of sight distance is available. 'Based on the 35. MPH posted speed a minimum sight' distance of 390 feet is required. (6) The,visual clearance requirements-of Chapter 18.745 will be net. Response to criteria b(6): The site will be designed to insure ,that the visual clearance requirements noted in the code will be met. This includes- at the comers of-the site property adjacent to the intersection of Gaarde Street at 110" Avenue and at the comers of the site driveways proposed on 110a' Avenue and on Gaarde Street.` This document has responded to the code criteria of Section 48:370-4 and the corresponding code . sections referenced throughout in order to justify the proposed site'access,on Gaarde Street., It has been documented that site must have access to both 1.1 a Avenue and Gaarde Street in order of function from a traffic safety and'capacity.standpoint and to minimize the, traffic impacts to the surrounding residential neighborhood. Charbonneau. Gaarde Street AccessJustification . April 28, 2605 e..,.;..ova..,. I I r` Tigard Riret Rantiet rhnrrh Q{lU I Inth A., lr".aai•Aa Ct JAI " ~ ~ ~e ~ Ilea frd tter s *4<Yh3 :+l't. 4 tixs,:ui?. ,9: ~N NON-RESIDENTIAL RE MAY 0 2 2005 fTF_-AP MG DW -7-7 )q CITY OF TIGARD' APPLICANT: /~Inc/, ~P,.,! - LA AGENT: rrT,~t3Phone: (:5, 8) a 31.-112a . X ~2`7 Phone: ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESSIGENERAL LOCATION: lit) ZS- SCJ 671,1912F SlgE TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): _ ~S1D30~ TL NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Mnp, -fd (lam ,~~i~~E L.ANfzs KF yieul , PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ~n6~Rc r',Q A 3i t00 so,~ E I^o~ q~~.~ ~d on ;~F. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: PS S CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.) AREA: Cz- 1j7Rjq L " ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. 3 30 MINIMUM LOT SIZE:~b~~ sq.,ft. Average Min. lof width: ft.' Max. building height 3D ft. .Setbacks: Front .9S ft. Side' :P ft. Rear ZZ G ft. Corner 2.0 ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation,area: - NEIGHBORHOOD. MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND. USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will-not be accepted: * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code. standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of aland use application. 'CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential AppficatioNPlanning Division Section dNARRATIVE (Beier to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT' SHALL SUBMIT-'A NARRATIVE, which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to-provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should, review the code for applicable criteria. IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact, study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study' shall address, at a .minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility.system and type of impact, the study shall propose. improvements necessary to meet City standards; and to minimize the impact of the development on the 'public at large, .public facilities systems, and affected private property users.. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of. real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the, real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.... 121 ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 183651 Minimum number of accesses: 1 Minimum access width: Ed /,m ' Minimum pavement width: yc)" All driveways and parking areas; except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR.ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial; institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and.egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between- buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial' complexes. Unless impractical; walkways should be. constructed between a new development and neighboring.'developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 8.730] ➢ STREETS: feet.fr the centerline of ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONE feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SI E YARD SETBACK. ] SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [ efer to Code Section '18.730.0110.111.1 BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTION Buildings .located in a ,non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor a ...a to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist;' ➢ All actual building setback will, be at least half (Y2) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not ab a residential zoned district.. BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE 'OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the. City, requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may•also be required; these are often advisable even if not .required by the 'Code. The required buffer -areas may only be occupied, by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required. buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pie-Application Conference Notes r. Page 2 of 8. NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to.your proposal area are: feet along north.boundary:" ~o feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: 2/ttANDSCAPIN6 (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18365 and 183051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six.(6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above. grade. Street trees, should be spaced 20 to, 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees maybe obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES. MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively.screen the parking lot areas from view. ' These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative' walls, and raised planters. .[,RECYCLIH6 (Refer to Code Chapter 183551 Applicant should.CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW. AND 'APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a.clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact ,person' and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. [/PARKING [Refer to Code Section 18365.0401 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: -pace a~ tAXA t 3 A~ "~,e (Y iR Parking'SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):' ~cr SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: . Parking SHOWN on. preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x'18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ➢ All -parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY. LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED.PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped arking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an' appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. EAMON6 AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be -provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as'approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes ' Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Applica6 manning Division Section BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Code Section 183651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL' DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. . . SENSITIVE LANDS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE' TO AREAS WITHIN . THE 100-YEAR. FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,' WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER; the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and -their boundaries is the responsibility of the applicant Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also. provides regulations for the use,' protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. 7 ❑ STEEP. SLOPES [Refer to Code Section 18.715.080.C1 • When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. [7~ CLFANWATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to R a 0 96,441USA Regulations - Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE.AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer, wide, enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 & el -Aw [QTHaO) EGErTATE a SENStTI1tE AREA pERINITION~, F t~ R a r "`~O~EN'StTIV;E /ARE~.~ CORRIDORrPESIDEx; R. b~k1Fx..c Aw. • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% f 10 to <50 acres. 15 feet 0 > 50 to < 100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0:5 acre '25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow. • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds Streams with intermittent flow draining: >2W 1 10 to <50 acres 30 feet 1 > 50 to <100 acres 50 feet Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure. • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow . ; in 25-foot increments from the starting Streams with intermittent flow draining > 100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in Natural.lakes and ponds <25% slope),,add 35 feet past the top of ravine6. Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for • streams/rivers, delineated, wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 . feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor, shall not serve as a starting point for measurement- SVegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. sThe-vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to .15 feet, if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Appfication/Planning Division Section ' Restrictions in the Ve etate Corridor: . NO structures, deve opretent, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall. be permitted which.otherwise detract . from the. water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the, CWS Design and Construction Standards. " Location of Vegetated Corridor: I ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES, MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain 'a. CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the.R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are 'no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not, required..' d SIGNS [Refer to Code Chapter 183801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part.,of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. [/TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18390.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcls for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18:790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 256/6 of existing trees over 12, inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150:070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; ► Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper 'requires that 50%.. of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D., Retainage, of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE '(1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE' will 'be. inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18.190.06011 REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering- site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of'.the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes - Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential ApplicaGon/Planning Division Section, If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: ' 0 The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper,size of the tree removed.or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property' > The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in-a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the . consent of the Director, elect to compensate the. ,City for -its costs in performing such tree replacement. CLEAR VISION AREA. (Refer to Code Chapter 183951, The Cit requires that CLEAR VISION, AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT ~8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of -the required dear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: .25 fe unless lot is created through the minor land partition 'process. Lots created as'pad. of a partition ust• have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS S LL NOT EXCEED 2'12 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than ,1'/z times th minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS Y 18.330 (Conditional Use) 18.620 (f-gaud Triangle Design Standards) LG 18.765 (off-street Par"/Loading Requirements) 18.340 (Directors interpretation) 18.630 (Washington Square Regional Center) / 18.775 (Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350 (Planned Development) .18.705 (AooesstEg'resslCinx,iation) y 18.780 (Signs) 18.360 (Site Development Review) 18.710 (Accessory Residential Units) 8.785 (Temporary Use Permits) 18.370 arianceslAdjustmenls) 18.715 (Densit(Computations) _~l• 18.790 (rree Removal) 18.380 (zoning MapText Amendments) - 18.720 (Design Compatibility standards) _-Z 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385 (Miscellaneous Permits) _-Z 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.798 (wireless Communication Facilities) rL 18.390 (Decision Making Proceduresllmpact Study) ' 18.730 (Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) 18.410 (Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740 (Historic odeday). 18.420 (land PaMons) 18.742 (Home Occupation Permits) 18.430 (Subdivisions) . ~ 18.745 (Landscaping & Screening Standards) 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts) a 8.750 (Manufadureciftbl Home Regulations) 4520 (Comnieraai zoning Districts) 18.755 (Moved sorid waste/Recydumg storage) 18.530 (industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Appfication/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: . 'r ~pf.DtTITiNfl(. bb VSO- (`L{~IQ~ ~Qkes -~S i l~~c'f' -ICS (['i iG C'tC1011 C~C1CP ACi~I~ ('_ATt(5~ Y1Q< ~C)P2,Cl ~PPm.P_~ CC~NYLOIe?'e.• ' E~ p+re s nS e ~ ~~1r, S~o~ ~c~c> (~\e e~1•'.,~c, ' C,-T. C\e_~~, ~.5~~•~~ 5~~.1:ces c`o,~;ae~- X03 (fl~l - 3(fla6 - 1 yee++ jj 5yrJe,jj, (`re Y~Q(1 -Yr16m a Ceram P'-A nrlacKl~~,1S4 w P l 1Cl 1 C1 PPS' M CL~r1 3 C a rl9 ~GI nZ~~i ~n ~i` Yn C~ 7+ P (1 CcvSV 4G4 Q~rc~iJe 'i',JS~ C?3 rP_rSz Q~..o,!a Cx- ,4e✓'i0~ (D o~ A hRt"L Q syr,^ qr Cei't\w"r.. j ri~~l+S~ryie'~11 dr .)rr; .9hCe- nV.tN,4 s1\'• Cam" (10~ cls~ PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Z Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission . with the Commission -making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. -An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the • Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted' by mail or dropped off at the counter without-Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an a lication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 b 11 inches. One 1 81/2"X 1"'map o a proposed roiect shou d be su lb~ mitte or attachment to the sta re ort or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted The Planning Division and Engineering Department will . perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30-days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of, the submitted . materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON•ResidenGal,Apprtcation/Manning Division section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or rotracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows, ~11 land use decisions. • An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard A basic flowchart which illustrates the review process is available from the, Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing -must have notice posted on-site by, the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development, of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints, affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING, AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED-. Final- inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all., conditions of development approval. These pre-application. notes do not include comments from the. Building Division.- For proposed buildings .or modifications to -existing buildings,. it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure.from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor:-Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development.. charge'-(SDC) .credits and-,the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated whemthe new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those s stem development credits to the first building ermit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE ' DIRECTED BY. THE DEVELOPER AT THE :TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference an -no es.canno cover a Code requirements an aspects related to site. planning that should al)pl to the development of your site plan. Failure'.of. the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the a plicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE. WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY:~aD CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-0111 FAX: .(503) 684-1291 E-MAIL (staff's first name)@ci tigard.or.us TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.ci.tigard.or.us H:Ipattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated:.. 3-Oct-02 (Engineering section: preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8. NDN-Residential Application/Planning Division section ATTACHMENT 5- r c 77 m R3.5 R4.5 W R4.5 R7 z R7 5 w o Qa as (7Y NEW CURB AND GUTTER (7¢ an wa NEW PLANTER STRIP a a ARCHITECT - LA NEW S'CONCRETE SIDEWALK 605 S.E. SHERMAN STREET SW 110TH AVE (LOCAL) PORTLAND, OR 97214.4666 . 5037231-1122 FAX 503 7 231-031 7 EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - c _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / ♦ i IW NAW1NGRNE 76'-0. GN 110.6 32'•6•', • STREET CENTERLINE ' 1q 24'-0' 211' ' t~117 MAPLE 5~ a t- _ _ _ _ _ r - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ S I +q',u EXISTING PROPERTY LINE r p-0 PHASEI PARKING 20 Setback EzI I 46SPACES 9I MINISrR2reuGiD N (HURCN EI [ id 38'-0' W FF. 5, 4 I iI, . FF. 254 9 3D'-0' ' 6 NEW PROPERTY LINE ' 1E AI ;n Nu - q r*- -AFTER 8'ROW DEDICATION ~Z O 24'-0' 24'-0' _ kyz =I V / Co 3'-0' 15'•6' - - - - - - - Co 181 • i HALL! F.. I I I 6 P - - W W k ° 3'OVERHANG c L I I 8'-6' o Iop BICYCLE 1110 I 1 rv M Q I , TYP. ~ PARKING J W Q R3.5 7VNE WE p :I I 10 ,f5 ® ® / EXISTING PARKING-76 SPACES I V7 Q V 3< qyE cc (n 10' PINE Sm J I I CO ®IP INJ I F Cn~ I- WATER i; I I w Lo OUALffYSWALE 10` w R12 p F O I o n o , I N r 17 FIR W r 10 ¢ r - I o \ '+t~ WAR Q LL 12' FIr ® ®7 FIR ' - 6'.6. * 6 4 - -O 10 PHASEIPARKING -74 SPACES 4 V 24•RA. NF1R L 'BIKE PATH 44'AR ® ® ® BqE v _4~~ 0 I _ 7ND EM F_BUFFEfl . 26-Flfl_ _ 4P~ 20 RR m w °8 _ 44 M BOUNDARY _ - a - - - - ' °m 3 \ VEGff TED g_-'" c~uvEa - "rm ~•ww CO NffY xr- 130 ® _ v7- - - - - - - m ERs c - UNARY EASEMEMH T__________ xA8 Ir An a 4•%E , >D 1CFtll4 ~l ~J 1 \ ® - _ _ \ - - NO BOUNDARY I , \ I r CENT RLINE FCR[EK R3.5 OF R3.5 I CONTENTS: PHASEISITE PLAN R3.5 - - - - - - - - - PROJECT: zozls - - - DRAWN BY I N I SITE AREAS: SHOP PHASE 1 SITE PLAN ® DATE: 4125/05 EXISTING PHA PH.2 R3.5 PH.3 SCALE=1'=30'-0• 05 15 30 REVISIONS: 1 BUILDING 12,793 S.F. = 6% 12,793 S.F. = 6% 22,222 S.F. = 11% 23,428 S.F. = 13% PARKING PHASE 1 CONDITIONAL USE Q REVIEW 271AL PARKING 27,460 S.F. = 14% 68,620 S.F. = 34% 54,650 S.F. = 27% 67.293 S.F. = 33% _ 3'OVERHANG SPACES: 8'6'X15'-6' 120 . ' 196 TOTA~ , LANDSCAPE 162,449 S.F.=80% 121,289 S.F.=60% 125.920 S.F.=62% 11 ,.15F.=54% EXISTING SPACES 76 TOTALS 202,702 S.F. = 100% 202,702 S.F. = 100% 202,702 S.F. = 100% 202,702 S.F. =100% ms asmmgqsnee ve P,.P"a Ak)1ITECr . U RNae, rtpaeclm ' psf a4pn Ey4M mew's sNC9r PCNbNE aCW bJ mGN DMNS~ ' a APCNNECr u ' Ocoylg4 Laos R3.5 R4.5 R4.5 R7 R7 NEW CURB AND GUTTER NEW PLANER STRIP ' ARCHITECT ' LA NEW 5'CONCRETE SIDEWALK PORTLANSHERMAN D, OR 805S.E.OR 7STREET 97214-4666 SW 110TH AVE 5031231-1122 - - - - - - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ FAX 5031231-0317 EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - - - - T 0 2rc 2 . CEDAR m vNewNaRNE HASE2 76-0'~ - - 24,-0 ` 55'-0' a 76'.6' 32.x • I , , 11 - - GN Q~ ~ n-r / ly✓ ~ STING PROPERTY LINE ] 1 r r - pI17L------' --PARKING EXREET CENTERLINE 1 SPAC I f p, 1 k. sem~~ 3'-0'-', 24'4' 3-0 Ii Tail r R; _ Selhack t Innl 1r e.~_li iNGr Exi n I f'- ~4{ ,C,HUf HPlil DSP, 4 I , I F It 30-0. I ' 6 LLjj- TYP. NEW PROPERTY LINE EAi,In.u. 3tq s , AFTER 8'ROW DEDICATION ~Z 43 n01111'LL T-0'3 i5'IV 24'-0 - 8 6 r I 1 TYP. 6 n 2,Wf).485 sRn , W elcva o. 0 W • 1 YASONflY 7A,tSN ENCLOSURE ' - PARKING 3 • LOADING I I ,P F 2alCEAR NSO©WITN o UNLOADING QO . I CHAD u+K FULL OPENING GATES I . ' ALIGN WITH DRIVE AISLE P co P PI ' w I Q R3.5 1 17PINE w (1J ' D = I F •I' P---'-- - IT PINE sNEOI~ tipQ PHASE2 V/ (nLD i ®,v PIN E ADDITION I''• WATER Lo QUALITYSWALE 10 R12 u- C ' ~ _ ° ~p 5 I (a7 u- C) p - 12- FIR 10 - ' IrEd ' 8`6- El IN ' 0wFIR BICYCLE PARKING INSIDE BUILDING TYP. IQ , IN _ z-'E'R 24'FIR ler ~ _-r 'BIKE PATH W FIR ® ® 10 _ T EASEMENT r PE - _ - - - •.E----- ---~F- WETLAND BUFFER f tlgR zv FIR BOU DARY W -1 FIR - N VEG TED ' CWSTERR Fm '6 I -ALDERS BOUNDARITY ' \ - - JLO aRR7tE'0. 20' BIKE PATH i ' \ _ _ "`--1- - - IVALD. 6j 11, E EASEMENT FIR 1 ~ w7 1 I _ - - - - - - - WETLAND BOUNDARY \ r---------------------------'- - - - - ' CENTERLINE OF CREEK R3.5 R3.5 Y • I CONTENTS: , PHASE 2 SITE PLAN L_________ R3.5 PROJECT : 20216 I DRAWN BY: R3.5 "°P PHASE 2 SITE PLAN N DATE:, 4125105 I ® REVISIONS : . ~ SCALE. I'cW-0' 0$ is 30 I ' 1 PARKING PHASE 2 1 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 2!17105 T OVERHANG SPACES: 8'6'X15'6' 118 ' L EXISTING SPACES 8 126 TOTAL Q2 i1o 01 eNe RpoWga - . AAaIrE~e u P.e,ee. npcecnm ~aa°'~ w.;mmx aARC >iNi TECru - OCaP„iy1 zons i i R3.5 R4.5 R4.5 R7 R7 NEW CURB AND GUTTER i • NEW PLANER STRIP ARCHITECT • LA 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET NEW 5'CONCRETE SIDEWALK PORTLAND, OR 97214-0666 h1122 503 /23 SW 110TH AVE FAX X 503 SD31231-0317 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTINGEDGEOFPAVEMENT - 2 - ° zPCFnAN t0 n IPHAW1x f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' _ - _ - - - _ _ - _ 01 et1AMlE 76'-0' 55'-0' 76'-5 0 37.5 STREET CENTERLINE 11 24'-0' I20 r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ j _ _ _ cD _ - , EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 10 D - - - 1 T-1 { p'- I TT ' ' AarP ' 6 w 20' i L-r I -0' # "v Eel i(Ifl~ E iIJ 'Setback 38'-0' m rlil 11HitULf:rJ' -CHUl Hf H 2 4 I I 30'-0' w J' 7 17 PHASE FF :a W 3'-0':15' S 24' 0. 1 3 Cc I I 4 ~ 11 ODITION ' I I NEW PROPERTY LINE ~ 6 w AFTER 8'ROW DEDICATION z I , , I I Q • ' TYP. 24'-0' 8 wq I 6 m I , .n 4 11 ICYCL ' I w w PARKING II, ' WSONx1'1N/Sx ENCIDSVRE IP 1:5Fluan wsn WI I o ` q 'PHASES ' Q QO I°IA1N UxK,wu oPExlxc~uAr1R ES , 'e IP FINE -•Q PARKING SS SPACESB~ S I /h Q 'AUDN WRN DRIYENSES N Lit R3.5 - by A m w c) 7 . w I 10 : P w I E 11 YP.3 m I , F >Q id I I 1 _ PHASE I V / ~ I { rya 2 w ~+ranE DDITION w I1r Lo cc LL Q WATER 10 ' $ Q R12 '•.OUALLTYSWALE O , q P I (7 r It FM Q N tt) 1 r~ - _ FtH tFxi' 10 FIR ® ®t FIN 7 $ ® ® r.... I 011 -FIR BICYCLE BPARKI UILDING `0 ID . o TYP. ~ 10 76 INSIDE BUILDING , - ' rry H - 21-FIR 24FlR EASEMENT - - - 1e' FIR ® ® ® BR v O 10 T , - ' _ - - - - - - _ - - - -?~F - WETLAND BUFFER 1PN N 20' FIR Gc° BOU DARY ' c~VstEn 3W sm fr ASH I . COMMUNITY 'Nb ' BOUNDARY BIKE PATH EASE ~ ® Q' m cl E . EASEMENT ' - \ ` - - _ - 1S Nn. ^ . - ' FlRS FIR I ND BOUNDARY ' r - • - CENTERLINE f OF CREEK CONTENTS: R3.5 R3.5 PHASE 3 SITE PLAN _ ' I R3.5 PROJECT : 20216 I DRAWN BY: R3.5 SHOP N ' DATE : 425105 PHASE 3 SITE PLAN SCALE=,-D'O' 05 15 30 REVISIONS: CONDITI I Q ONAL USE PARKING PHASE 3 REVIEW REVIEW 2!17105 TOVERHANGSPACES: 8'-WX15'-0' 165 EXISTING SPACES 8 I 173 TOTAL Q3 M1aarwigg Oe eusID Fmp"d . M°11fEc' Rewe~,euP~ pP bylnr me .,may pFC.Icarp.A. Pm,.mm ' OCap/,pY mIs I ATTACHMENT 6 CUP2004 00005 ~ AGENCIES ~ 6 STAFF COMMENTS.., REQUEST=FOR. COMMEHYS CITY OFTIGARD Community Development. S&TingA Better Community DATE: March 30, 2005 TO: Matt Stine: Urban Forester/Public Works Annex ' FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division . . STAFF CONTACT:' r a - a on 3 R9.. fir Fax: 15031684-1291 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT [CUP12004-000051SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEWS [SLR12005-00005/ SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW [SLR1-2005-000061DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2005-00016 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD Q REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use Permit approval for a three-phased expansion. Phase 1 consists of new on site parking for 134 cars. No new access-to SW Gaarde Street is proposed-with this phase, but Sensitive Lands Reviews are required for the.drainageway.and step slopes present on site.. Phase 2.consists of a new two-story 4,450 square foot addition between the existing church and ministry buildings. This phase will also reconfigure the existing parking lot to, provide access to the new addition, closing the existing access on Gaarde. Street, and constructing a new access from Gaarde. Street to the new parking lot in Phase 1:, An Adjustment to the' 600-foot access spacing standards .is required. Phase 3 consists of :a new two-story18,000 square foot multi purpose gymnasium building. With this phase, the.2,300 square foot 'Bolt Hall" will be demolished and replaced by an, additional 47 parking spaces. LOCATION: 11.075 SW. Gaarde Street; WC.TM 2S103DC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-15.zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at. a minimum lot, size of. 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted ;conditionally. Some civic and institutional' uses are also permitted .conditionally.' APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters .18.330; 18.360,- 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18:745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790; 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by `various departments and agencies and from other information 'available to our staff, a. report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment'on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 13, 2005. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate'letter, to return your, comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date; please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have.any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125.SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard; OR .97223. tiP ^E_ASE CHf~GK:THI= F:OLLOWIN )TEN[S'Tl-C,AT APphY _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no.objedtions to it., _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to'the enclosed letter: Written comments provided below: Nan ~(FS 1=i+R P}}ItklKb LeT° bTRE T 7dtEEY` buF 715 QOSE PR OD IM r7j' 7b CA EEC . , WEtEn1 C xTrrK6 aGA-6.90w - 1, A ~krrr44S :W' ,yi*rtA&Al_ PrkCk rn lb A0 DAE Nah1e.& Numberof Person(s)Comm'entingr MEMORANDUM TO: : Morgan Tracy FROM: Matt Stine, City Forester RE: First Baptist Church of Tigard DATE: April 4, 2005 As you requested I have provided some comments on the "First Baptist Church of Tigard" project. If you have any questions:or concerns regarding my comments please contact me anytime. 1. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 18.745.030.C, Installation Requirements. The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. 2. The plant material shall be of•high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock (ANSI Z-60,1-1986, and any other future revisions); and 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with'the provisions of this title. • The accepted planting procedures are the-guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well- as the standards set forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. v In the Architectural.Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there .are directions for soil amendments and modifications. In order to develop tree species'diversity onsite ;it is.recommended that the following guidelines be followed: oNo more than 30%.of,any'one family be planted onsite. o No more than 20% of anyone genus be-planted onsite. o No more than 10% of any one species be planted onsite. 18.745.030.E,. Protection of Existing Landscaping. Existing vegetation on a site shall be' protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around the individual trees). See comments under "Tree Removal". .18.745.030.G. Conditions of Approval of Existing Vegetation. The review procedures and standards for required landscaping and screening shall be specified in the conditions of approval during development review and in no instance shall be less than that required. for conventional'development. See recommended conditions of approval. at the end of this memorandum. 18.745.040, Street Trees A. Protection of existing vegetation. All development projects fronting on a public street, private stiei et or a private driveway more than 100 feet-in length approved after the adoption of this title shall.be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards,in Section 18.745.040.C. • The accepted planting procedures are the'guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual: These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines-as well as the standards set forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10t' edition: In the Architectural Graphic Standards. there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil'amendments and modifications. • In order-to develop tree species diversity onsite it is recommended that the following guidelines be followed: o No more than 30% of any.one family be planted onsite. o No more than 20% of any one, genus be planted onsite. o No more than 100/6 of any one species be planted onsite. 2. TREE REMOVAL 18.790.030,. Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall'be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of,lots or parcels for.which a development application for a. subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever. possible. B. Plan requirements.' The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size.and species'of all 'existingArees ; including trees designated as significant by the city; 2. Identification. of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper.. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of ekisting'trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section . 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 250/6-to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper'requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; c. Retention. of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches.-in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be' . mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. 3. Identification of all trees.which are proposed to be removed; 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. • As required, the applicant submitted a .tree, plan.-that was conducted by Ray Myer. The plan contains all four of the required components of a tre;&plan, . and, is therefore, acceptable. • Due to the close, proximity of this project, to the creek, I suggest using only + native tree and shrub species in the parking lot and along the streets. • . When cutting the blackberry in the creek's buffer area I suggest leaving the cuttings'where they fall to protect the soil from.erosion. • If it is necessary to enter the tree protection zone •at.any time with equipment (trucks, bulldozers, etc.) the project arborist and Cityyorester must be notified before any entry occurs. Before entering the TPZ, the project arborist and City.Forester shall determine the method by which entry can occur, along with any additional tree protection measures. • Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project Arborist shall submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site a_re healthy, stable and viable in their'modified growing environment. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Prior. to commencing site -work, the applicant shall submit cash or other security for the equivalent value of mitigation required (number of caliper inches times $125 per caliper inch): If additional trees are preserved through the subdivision improvements and construction of houses, and are properly protected through these stages by the same measures afforded to other protected trees on site, the amount of cash or other security may be correspondingly-reduced. Any trees planted on the site or off site in accordance with 18.790.060 (D) will be credited against the cash' or other security, for two years following final plat approval. After,such time, the applicant shall pay the remaining balance as a fee in lieu of planting. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the. applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a . hazardous tree. 3. Prior to commencing any site work, . the applicant shall submit construction drawings that include the approved Tree Removal, Protection and Landscape Plan. The plans shall also include a construction sequence, including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. Only those trees identified on the approved Tree Removal plan are authorized for removal by'this decision. 4. Prior to commencing any : site work, the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to be retained.. ' The applicant shall allow access by the City Forester for the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locations'shall be grounds for immediate suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be processed. 5. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Forester,'at least, once every two weeks, from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing* installation, through site work, as he monitors the .construction activities and progress. These reports should include any changes that'occurred,to the TPZ.as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the`amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall, long- term health and stability-of the tree(s)., If the reports are not submitted or t received by the City Forester at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan is not being followed by the contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Forester. and the Project Arborist. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction, and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. 6. Prior to issuance of building, permits, the applicant shalC,submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot, location of tree protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the house. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction, and shall remain- in place through the duration of home building. After approval from the City Forester, the tree protection measures may be removed. If you have any'questions please call me anytime. Thank you for requesting my comments on this project. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 4/14105 TO: Morgan Tracy, Associate'.Planrier FROM,: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer RE: CUP2004-00005 First Baptist Church. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.1-1.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with -all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AAS HTO. Charbonneau Engineering has submitted.a Traffic Analysis Report for this' project,' dated April 2004. The report,addresses sight distance at the proposed driveways. According to the engineer the sight distance is adequate at the driveways on 110tt' Avenue. The report did not address sight distance at the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110th Avenue. The report states that the speed is 25 mph, which is incorrect. Gaard&Street is an Arterial with a posted speed of 35 mph. The applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification using the correct speed, for the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110th. Avenue,, along with a list of required improvements, with their Public Facilities Improvement (PFI) permit application. Final•sight distance certification will be required for the Phase.I (existing) driveway on 11Oth:Avenue and the intersection prior to final building inspection of Phase I. Final sight distance certification will be required for the Phase II (proposed) driveway on 110th Avenue prior to final building inspection of Phase II: Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence zrea of collector or arterial street.intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The.minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be1.50 feet, measured from the right-of-.way. line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed.driveway. The setback maybe greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer, review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore ENGINEERING COMMENTS' CUP2004-00005. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 1. any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access'is' not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the' intersection as possible. Gaarde Street is classified as an Arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP). The existing'driveway on 1 lot" Avenue is over 250 feet. north of Gaarde Street, thereby meeting this. criterion. The existing driveway on Gaarde Street is only about 80 feet west of the 110th Avenue' intersection, which does not meet this standard.- The existing driveway shall be removed prior to final building inspection of Phase I. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet., The minimum . spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125. feet. The classification of 110th Avenue is a Neighborhood Route (local street),, therefore this spacing standard does not apply to the driveways. located on 110th Avenue. Gaarde Street is classified as a 3 Lane Arterial requiring spacing of 600 feet between streets and driveways. The existing driveway is only about 80 feet from 110th Avenue, while the proposed driveway is 220 feet from 110th Avenue. Both driveways do not meet this spacing standard and are, in fact, substantially below 'the standard. Staff recommends denial of the proposed driveway, as it does not meet the standard and cannot meet the adjustment and variance criterion. Staff has previously. recommended removal of the existing. driveway because of its location within the influence'area of an Arterial intersection (See 18.705.030.H.2). The development has two driveways that can be utilized; on 110th Avenue, both of which are in compliance with the Access Management standards of 18.705.030.H. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides 'construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable- standards are addressed below: ' Streets: -Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a. development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 2 Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any .new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a 3-lane Arterial Street to have, a .76 right-of-way width and 48-foot paved ..section. Other' improvements 'required may ' include . on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground . utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street.trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Gaarde Street, which is classified as a 3-lane Arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan -Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline,' according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the:additional ROW to provide 38 feet from centerline. SW Gaarde is currently improved. In order to mitigate the impact,from this development, the applicant should install street trees' and remove the existing driveway, replacing it with curb and sidewalk, Minimum Rights-of.-Way and' Street Widths:.Section 18.810.030.E.requires'a Neighborhood Route (local street) to. have a' 54 foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other, improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 110th, which is classified 'as a Neighborhood Route on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan.Map.' At present, there-is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax_ assessor's. map. No.additional RO.W dedication is required... SW 110th is currently partially improved. In order.to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct half-street, improvements. Grades and Curves: Section _18.810.030:N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street ' (except that local or residential 'access streets may.,have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The existing roads do not exceed-9%, thereby..meeting this criterion. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors- Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts' or is traversed by'an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the.development design shall provide ENGINEERING COMMENTS, .CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ' PAGE 3 adequate protection for residential: properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible,` the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts.' The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another'street; • Screen planting at the rear onside. property line to be contained in a non-access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets.with different classifications, primary access should be. from the lower classification street. This development has access to two streets with different classifications. The existing and proposed driveways,on Gaarde Street, which is the higher classification street (Arterial), do not meet the Access Management standards of ` 18.705.030.1-1 and staff has recommended they be denied. This would leave two driveways on 110th Avenue that meet the Access management standards'and provide,primary access in compliance with this standard. Block. Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for. the _use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that. the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along. the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or; pre-existing development or; For blocks. adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation 'provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways. shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict . adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 4 Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from.being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 . times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district: PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(6) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage-on public or pprivate streets, other than an alley. in the case of a land partition, 18.420.050:A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit; the frontage shall be at least 15 feet PLANNING. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet'City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There are existing sidewalks on Gaarde Street and a portion of the frontage along 110th Avenue. The applicant's plans indicate they will be constructing half- street improvements for the remainder of their 110th Avenue frontage.. These . improvements include sidewalks, thereby meeting -this criterion. SanitarySewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary'sewer be . installed to serve each new-development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the.adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.C states that`proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's plans indicate they will be lowering the existing sewer lateral that serves this'site. The applicant's engineer shall confirm that the existing sewer lateral is adequate in size to serve all future development... Because the work to lower*the line. will take place in the creek and associated buffer areas the „ applicant must obtain the necessary approvals to work: in this area. 'The connection to main is required to be included in the PFI application. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 5 Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and floodwater runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.C states that .a culvert or.other* drainage facility shall be, large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether'inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall'approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction. Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development., Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.81.0:100.D. states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that,the additional runoff resulting from,. the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and. Construction Standards . for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future.revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes 'a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction p'rogram.resulting in no net. increase in storm peak flows up to the.25-year event. The City will require that . all new developments resulting in an. increase- of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent-to. Fan no Creek; the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without'defention.' The applicant's engineer has submitted calculations for detention. The impervious surface areas used -for the calculations do not match the Site Area summary provided on Sheet A1: The areas are approximately 5% different. Prior'to construction, the applicant's engineer shall submit revised calculations for review and approval. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:.. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 6 "Bikeway Extension: 'Section 18.810.110".A states.that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's, adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for, the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way: ' 1.10thAvenue is not classified as a bicycle facility.."„Gaarde Street is classified as " a bicycle facility.. The recent City. project provided bicycle striping, therefore this . criterion is met.. Utilities: Section 18810.120 states. that all utility. lines; but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes'and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility. service " facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines, operating at 50,000 volts orabove, and: • The developer shall make all.necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities,.including sanitary sewers and-storm drains - installed in streets by the'-developer, shall be constructed prior to"the surfacing of the streets; and` • , Stubs.for service connections shall,be" long enough to avoid. disturbing the street. improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section "18.810.120.C states Ghat a" developer shall pay"a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place'on-a streetwhere existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority deterMin"es that the cost and.technical difficulty of under= . grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit:o.f under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The.most common, but not.the only, such situation is ,a " short frontage development for which under-grounding would.,result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground- utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground,and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee' in-lieu of under - grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage.of SW 110th Avenue. If the fee" h lieu is proposed, it is equal to. $ X5;00 per lineal foot of street frontage ENGINEERING COMMENTS .,CU,P2004-00005 FIRST-BAPTIST CHURCH "PAGE 7 that contains the overhead fines: The frontage along this site is, 600 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 211000,00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH' STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings:' A Traffic Analysis Report; dated April 2004, was prepared by Charbonneau Engineering for this development;. Driveway Spacing: The driveways (existin'g and proposed) on 110th Avenue meet the spacing standards of 18.705.030.H. The driveways (existing and proposed) on Gaarde Street do'not meet the standards of 18.705.030.H. This section of the Development Code was discussed earlier in this report with staff recommending approval of the driveways on 110th'Avenue and denial of the driveways on Gaarde Street. Left Turn Warrants: The engineer's analysis indicates that.-left turn warrants are not met with the project build out. Traffic Signal Warrants: „The report indicates that with the low peak hour traffic volumes, signalizatio i is.not'warra_ nted at the'intersection,of-Gaarde Street and 110th Avenue. Capacity'Analysis:.The reportindicates that the study intersections will continue to operate at,acceptable levels of service after the proposed expansion of this project. Public Water.System: The City of Tigard provides water service in this area. The applicant's plans indicate they will be using an existing domestic service and Fire Department Connection (FDC)._ The.applicant's,plans for the PFI.application,shall include any additional water work proposed: „ Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS). Design.and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction. of.on-site.water quality facilities. The facilities.' shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in-100 . percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be'submitted indicating the ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005' FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH . PAGE 8 frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. The calculations shall be revised to reflect the actual- impervious areas, as there is a discrepancy between the calculations and the Site Area summary provided o.n_ the plan Sheet A1. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility.that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation. of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at'completion of the construction. Prior•to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide.the City.of - Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality. facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and-Construction Standards also regulate erosion control_.to reduce the amount of sedimentand other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction,• grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required. to submit an. erosion control plan for City review and approval, prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land.' Since this site is over one acre, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from-the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with., the site and/or building permit. Site.Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit-from the Building Division to cover all~on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to approval of the final plat. ENGINEERING COMMENTS ''CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 9' Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 50.00. per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. Recommendations: THE.F.OLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of 'a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover half street improvements and any other work in the public right=of--way.. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall,be submitted for review to.-the Engineering Department. NOTE:' these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division -and should only include'sheets relevant-to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). The.PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number.of the_individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permitted", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if -the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc.- Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. The applicant shall provide ?,construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this, plan is for parking and traffic control during the.public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No. construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles, of any contractor or subcontractor involved in'. the 'construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall . include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with.the project. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004=00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 10 Additional right;of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of . 'Gaarde to increase the right=of-way to 38 feet from.the centerline. The description shall be- tied to .the. existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms.. instructions are available from the Engineering Department. The applicant shall submit construction -plans to the Engineering: Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of 110th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard- pavement section for a local ' street from curb- to centerline equal to'16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie. the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be'built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed;' D. storm. drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete. sidewalk with a 5 foot planter strip; F. street,trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; . G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be _ approved by City Engineer; 1: underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 110th. Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. The applicant shall submit construction plans. to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Gaarde.Street as a part of this project:. A. removal of the existing driveway, replacing it with curb and sidewalk; B. street trees spaced per TDC requirements; and C. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved -by City Engineer. The applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification for. the intersection of 110th Avenue and Gaarde Street, with a list of improvements require& to meet the standard. The engineer shall use the posted speed of 35 mph or the 85th percentile, whichever is greater. Sanitary.sewer and 'storm drainage details shall,be provided as part of the - Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. A connection permit is ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 11 required for, the reconnection, of the sewer lateral to the main after lowering the lateral. The applicant's engineer shall revise.stormwater detention and water quality calculations with the actual impervious surface areas as reflected on Sheet Al. Any extension of public water lines shall be shown on the. proposed Public Facility ,-Improvement (PFI) permit construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department; as a part of the Engineering Department plan review. NOTE: ; An estimated 12% of the, water system costs must be on deposit with the Water. Department prior to approval of the PFI.'permit.plans from, the' Engineering Department and construction of public water lines. The applicant shall provide an {on-site water.quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No..00-7). . Final plan s.'and calculations shall be' submitted to the Engineering, Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of- the site permit. In..addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. An erosion control plan shall be provided. as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition.» The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. THE FOLLOWING. CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT:, Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171,, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall'pay an addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat,:: Engineering). ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 12- THE•.FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO' FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McM.illan, 639-4171,-ext. 2642) for.review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection,•the applicant,shalleomplete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and. provide a one-year. maintenance assurance for said improvements. Prior to final building inspectiori,..the'applicant shall provide the City with as- built drawings of the public improvements "as_'follows:. 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of. the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise'"DXF" will be. acceptable, and 3) the as-built,drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network.' The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure;(manholes catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water' system'features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane 'Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). The applicant's engineer shall provide final sight distance certification for the intersection of 1:loth, Avenue%Gaarde Street. and the driveways on 110th Avenue... . The existing driveway on Gaarde shall be removed prior to.f nal building' inspection..-. The applicant shall either place the existing overheadutility lines along SW 11 Oth Avenue underground as a part•of this . project; or they shall pay the fee in-lieu- of undergrounding. _ The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be,$ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen,, the amountwill be $.21,000.00 and it shall-be paid prior to final building inspection.;. To ensure compliance with Clean Water•Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design-'and specifications of the private water quality facility,to perform construction and visual , observation ' of the water quality facility for compliance"with the design and specifications. , These inspections shall: be made at significant stages, :and at completion of the construction: Prior to final. building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the 'City of Tigard .(Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation- that the water quality facility.*is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact:, Hap Watkins,'Building Division. ENGINEERING COMMENTS C002004-00005 FIRST,BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 13 ~.~TLAND LAND USE NOTIFICATION FORM 3f3 l~l~Jr (this form is to be completed only by planning, department staff for mapped wetlands/waterways) DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS WETLANDS PROGRAM 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 10,0; Salem; OR 97301-1279; (543) 378-3805 . 1. County: AAIA:vW N&rDAl Local Case File CUP 20OLt - 0005 City: DSL File WN.a065- 0081 (completed by DSL Staff) Responsible Jurisdiction: .City ❑ County DSL Project 43519 (completed by DSppL Staff) 2. APPLICANT: I-Pfla& Lu./`n,.A1.e,t~ LANDOWNER: Tto Fc,.d ts~ vr~1n of I4 I., rd tim 80s sC S'ium" e mailing address mailing address per an J OIL' I7Zl~( -Lurie-ra OK 91 _713 mailing address wiling address RECEIVED .PLANNING city, state zip= city, state zip ( - ( J .,APR,- phone ~ ~Q(l5 phone phone '3. LOCATION " . T 15 ' R 1 u/ S 05 'A F~ Tax Lot(s) lC av CITY'OF `f IGARD Address (street/city) -11 D7~Cx~o~ S . , 'Ty~a._d oR NWT quad map name Attach all the following (with site marked):(f~njNWIMap (if no LWI map) . P cel Mag) . e Pl (if any) If applicable attach: ❑ Other 4. SITE INFORMATION LWFNWI Wetland Classification Codes(s) Adjacent Waterway (if any) 1=17j 2I, Cree.4 Zoning .5. PROPOSED ACTIVITY ❑ site plan approval ❑ subdivision' ❑,ading permit . E] planned unit development . .9 conditional use permit ❑ building permit (new structures) ❑ Other Project Description ~iy~u sG gxf&osra~n MLU~, rtie✓;,,~ , o rser r ,i►a~ , GU --r . Completed by/Contact. _ a yia_ o. 39 l7l Date 3130 O Address 13125 5+.,1 H,_ U 131v J. rd OR :1223 Phone: (10~ 163 - (J/71 )e Z'aZ J DSL RESPONSE • ❑ A removal-fill pernut.1s.required, from the Department of State Lands ❑ A iernoval-fill permit will be required when the development project proceeds AA removal-fill permit may be required 1SQ A permit may be required by the Corps of Engineers (503-808-4373) Information needed includes: r ` ~J A wetland determination/delineation report (Consultants list enclosed) . ❑ State Permit # wa's issued . ❑ has been applied for ❑ No removal-fill permit is required for the described project if/because: Comp tS on 6,M), alo l e- n r-ma on i ` LA. 'd c'f-ior Comments: wr t Joy - S r ro [.i U i G Or cox ctrtc~ c~Q tf', -Po ❑ On rte Visit By: Date: Response completed by: Date: *If the project is changed to involve fill or removal from the wetlands area, a state terrioval-fil p t will be.required. http://www.oregonstateIlands.us/wetlanduse.htin • August 2004 COUNTYWIDE Date: 12~ /3 OIL Plans Check No. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ProiectTitle: WORKSHEET _6 I ' (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) % Applicant: Mailing Ad,dress:. Tax Map No. K Site Address:. Land Use Category Rate Per Trip Pa ment Method ❑ RESIDENTIAL $ 269.00 0 CASH/CHECK O BUSINESSICOMMERCIAL $ 68.U0 ❑ , CREDIT ❑ OFFICE $ 247.00 ❑ BANCROFT (PROMISSORY NOTE) O INDUSTRIAL $ 259.00 ❑ DEFER TO OCCUPANCY INSTITUTIONAL $111.60, LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE. WEEKDAY AVG TRIP RATE WEEKEND AVG TRIP RATE (institutional) BASIS (06 Mot CALCULATIONS Y, 5.) (I fS Auxg (p c3_ L4 '2q -(Vtf L5 2- q -7 (o ADDITIONAL NOTES` 1 • 0I►~16n u 1y F/ . ' I (in r (,~6.1: 9 6 '`'I -F . :l t t..r i ~1(. i7i(/4~~~ GF1'a`e'•. 1`?.4:'L/ , ~!<;.~,t;, ~"~tti'1f I Vt~~,• ~.G• .Pl,'fa.. '~'(~Lt~ i` j•,r ,n., i t ' n -•~-n . ~ ~ PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ROAD AMOUN TRANSIT AMOUNT TOTAL FEE ~D a PREPARED BY ATTACHMENT ] 1 Q APPLICANT'S' APPLICATION 6 MATERIALS o a 6 b II I Di it 4 ~ PRE -APP. HELD BY: CITY OF :TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 13125.SW HALL "BOULEVARD. TIGARD; OR 97223-8189 503.639:41711503.684.7297 RECEIVED CITY OF TIGARD OREGON LAND' USE.PERMIT APPLICATION MAR 0 2 200 . File # Other Case'# Dale By~ Receipt # City ❑ Urb ❑ Da Pe omplete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYWIS FOR""'. ❑ Adjustrr►ent/Variance (I or 11) ❑ Minor Land Partition (11) ❑ Zone Change (lit) E]Comprehensive. PIan.Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) Zone Change Annexation. (IV) Conditional Use (111), Sensitive Lands Review (t,' II or III) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amondment (IV) Historic Overlay (II or 111) (]Site Development Review (11) ❑ Home Occupation (11) ❑-Subdivision (II or 111) " Tess ava~ a e 75` %0 ,c~~.4~tAE st 2 Jai Dc T!„ 1160 T rE ,¢,5 Ac X3.5 [.ocv.V.y R~t~Ti/tt~ e o t 5 r, e & : sr arc , oR" . '9,72 ¢ is more an one TI~~xD,~IRST Sl~-ptlST Gtf~f~G~f ~ . , ~ ; . . !io 75 ~uJ cis}-sr sT TEA, o 97223 PHUNL: NU. ;517/30 When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be ~g purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner'or an agent of the owner... The`c&vners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this a " lication. (Please spep APPLICATIONS WILL NOT. BE ACCEPTED:-. WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRI13ED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT7PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Own gat re Date Owner's Signature Date, Owner's Signature Date. Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representativels, Signature, Date Apptlcant/Agent/Representatlve's Signature Date FORM No. 761-WARRANTY DEED-CORPORATION, GTEv ENS•NESS LAW PUB. Co.. PORTLAND, ORB. SCI /tRL KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESET (JNTS, that F.j X..st...Baptis.t..Church..of..Ti.gard_....__ a corporation duly organized and existing under th# laws of the State of........ Oregon hereinafter. called grantor, ...Dollars in consideration of.....~~j.I:C?'' i--= = ' to grantor paid, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and .convey unto COnS.er:VatiVe..BaPti.St_.Metro.-... ~2Alitatl.Ml.3SioX1..SQC.7.etx , hereinafter called grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns," that certain real property, with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or, appertaining, situated in the "County of._.Washingtoni and State of Oregon, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at'a point South 890 351 West 1419.00 feet and North 00 11, West 20.00 feet from the Southeast corner of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette' Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, thence North 00 111 West 171.00 feet; thence South 890 49, West 126.00 feet; thence.South 00.111 East 171.00 feet to a point North 00 111 West 20.00 feet from the South line of said Section 3; thence North 890 35, East 126.00 feet to the point of be- ginning. To Have and to Hold the above described and granted premises unto the said grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever. And said grantor hereby covenants to and with said grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, that grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the above granted premises, free from all encum- brances.......................... no=................... and that grantor will warrant and forever defend the above granted prem- ises and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons whomsoever. ".In. construing this deed and where the context so requires,'the singular includes the plural. ~`.'..U.''~ r Done by order of the grantor's board of directors, with. its corporate seal attached, this day of.... F.e ruary 1~.9.. ..Fi.rst..Raptiist_. Church._of-..T*ax-d r, ~'a /CORFORiA~ri a7EAL) B ent Z~.Presid ter ~ `i Ji'.~r ~ .........~.............a ~"':---...Secretary (0Rs)99.490J J STATE OF OREGON, County of......'/1c.. ..t..) ss. `~C~ • ll-J.., 19.4'x.. ' • i Personally appeareh..V-'! ....and>~Y. r4, . i' whd' be n p~e sworn, each for h' self and not one for the other, stated that the former is th ' V . • , - (President or other officer) artdthat the'lmtter is led ~,~x. :r.. of grantor corporation and that the seal affixed hereto is t laecrVI; or a officer) its seal"arrd flat 'this was voluntari y signed and sealed in behalf of the corporation by authority of its board of directors. . • L Before me: ....11. { ~A ' (~FFIIAL~S)±T:) Notary Public for Oregon. j! My commission expires STATE OF OREGON /5. ' WARRANTY DEED Cnunty'af Washington ~ SS CORPORATION 1, Roger.Thomssen, Director of Records and Elections and Ex-Officio Recorder of Conveyances (DON'T USE THIS for said county, do hereby certify that the "within TO SPACES RESERVED instrument of writing was received and recorded FOR RECORDINO in book of records Conoexvatiw..Bapliot..Metro=....... LAaEL fN couN- . No. TIER WNERH ' Of said County . 's USED.) AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO Witness my hand and seal affixed. ISkroli F all-~ r . ROGER THOMSS EN, Director of Records &-Elections At at Law 9047 Glisan 4- MAR f 0 10 16 AH P t] and, egon 9720G`*~-.=~a Deputy ! 7~~?e1 OOK .735 PyE 736 IVE Ga' A P` ~ F PRO ARC ~ ~ .~'v~►y, ,FOR , . - pRD • ~ HuRCH TAG • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ - ST BAPTIST C : _ - . R GAARBE SS ~ . Ft 11075. SW 97223 GAR~OREGON REVISED 2117105 ;ARCHITECT; N ST HERM~A 4 _ $~5 S LAND; ova 972 PART t FIRST.BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD . CONDITIONAL USE NARRATIVE . SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL : This project consists of'a 22,500 'sq: ft. addition to Tigard First Baptist Church; and the. addition of. 114 parking spaces, to be constructed in three,phases: Phase 1 consists of new on-site parking for 134 cars,.street improvements to 110'h Avenue and related utilities and water quality facilities. No new access to Gaarde, is-planried under this phase Phase 2 consists of :a new two story, 4450 sq. ft, addition connecting the existing Church and Ministry Buildings. Work includes the remodel of. approximately 2115 sq. ft. of the existing Church Building. Included in this'phase isthe modification'of the existing parking lot to provide access to. the covered main entrance of the new addition,.closing the existing access to Gaarde and constructing a new access,to the phase 1 parking lot onto Gaarde. Phase 3 consists of a new two story, 18,000 sq. ft. Multi-Purpose Gymnasium Building:' Work also„ ' . includes the demolition of the existing 2300 sq. ft. Bolt Hall and parking for an additional 47 cars. Materials are planed to integrate the new addition'with the existing church. This will provide a project with an overall uniform appearance; that complements the neighborhood surrounding the church: IMPACT STUDY (Sections 18.390:040 and 18.390:050) • Transportation System:.A traffic-engineer's study has been provided which confirms that the streets affected by this development, 'SW 11& Ave. and Gaarde St., will continue.to operate at acceptable, levels of service. Bikeways will be provided in accordance with City of Tigard Development Code • Drainage System: An existing'storm drainage-system exists on the western portion of the property which currently provides drainage for the site. The new development provides anew water quality swale to handle the storm water. • Parks System: The existing church on this site currently serves the surrounding community and no increase-in park usage is expected as a result-of this development , • Water System: 'We have contacted the City of Tigard regarding the adequacy of water service at this site. `We were assured that the existing public water system is adequate,to serve this development. • Sewer System:. The site is served by an existing 8 inch,public sewer line which runs'along the west portion of the property. This line has sufficient capacity to serve the new development.. Noise impacts: Following construction, no unusual or, excessive: noise is expected'to be generated by this project beyond, that which is.normal for this type of. use as compared to other churches in the area.'. Bike Path Easement: We propose to provide a blanket easement within the boundaries of the natural resource area for the construction of the future bike path. APPROVAL CRITERIA FINDINGS Chapter 18.330 - Conditional Use • 18-330:030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval: A.1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate'area for-the proposed use. Minimum lot size required,20,000sq ft:, 202.702 sq. ft. provided. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD CONDITIONAL USE NARRATIVE A.2. The.impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features. The proposed facilities have been designed to fit within the. required setbacks, to fit the slopes and so as not to encroach'into the existing wetlands and vegetated community, boundaries.. A.3:. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. ' • Transportation System: A traffic engineer's study has been provided which confirms that. the streets affected by this development,. SW 110`h Ave. and'Gaarde St., will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service.. Bikeways wili.be providedin accordance with City of Tigard Development'Code: • Drainage System: An existing storm drainage system exists on the western portion of the property which currently provides drainage for the site. The new development provides a new water quality swale to handle the storm water: Parks System: The existing church on this site currently serves the surrounding community and-no increase in park usage is expected as a result of this development • Water System: We have contacted the City of Tigard regarding the adequacy of.water service at this site. We were assured that the existing public water system is adequate to serve this development. • Sewer,System:' The site is served by an existing inch public sewer line which runs along the west portion of the property. This line has sufficient capacity to,serve the new development.. • Noise Impacts: Foilowing construction, no unusual or excessive noise is expected to be generated, by this project beyond that which is normal for this type of'use.as compared to. other churches in the area. A.4. The applicable requirements,of the zoning district are met except as'modified by this chapter. See discussion of Chapter 18:510. below.' A.S. The setbacks required by Chapter 18.330:050 are:met as follows: t " ' Front yard, corner lots:. 20 ft. required: Existing buildings violate the 20 ft. setback along 110`h Avenue. New construction will be'no closer than 20.ft: Setbacks along Gaarde are 32 ft. • Side and rear yard setbacks required` 20 ft. 134 ft. i•ninimum provided. Chapter 18.360 - Site Development Review 18.360.090 -'Approval Criteria: A.2.a. Proposed new buildings~have been designed and located with respect to-the existing buildings, topography, site drainage, and vehicular_and pedestrian traffic patterns. Trees have been preserved to the extent practical. A.4. Buffering and screening have been provided between this site and the adjoining residential 'properties as shown on the landscape plan•and as discussed under paragraph 18.7.45 "below. A.9. This project is-designed for public'access to the church facilities: Public sidewalks border the site and internal.sidewalks connect to building entrances. A.10. All areas of, the site are designed to. be well lit"and open to visual observation from all buildings as much as practical. A.11. This site is served by Tri-Met bus lines 94, 12 and 95. The' nearest bus stop is approximately 1 /4 mile away on SW Pacific Hwy.. A.12. All landscaping has been•designed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.745. A minimum of 54% of the gross site'area will. be in landscaping as indicated on the landscape plan. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD_ 'CONDITIONAL USE.NARRATIVE A.14. All provisions for the,disabled have been designed intaccordance with the. requirements of ORS 447, Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Chapter 11, and Americans with Disabilities Act. Chapter 18.37,0 Variances and Adjustments • 18.370.020 -'Adjustments C.5. A new:'access is proposed on SW Gaarde Street, which is classified as an "arterial".' The minimum spacing for streets and driveways.along an, arterial is 600 ft. The proposed driveway is shown 200 ft from ;the intersection of SW 110`h and SW Gaarde. due to the site constraints. The street frontage on.Gaarde'is approximately,328 ft. In addition there is a major drainage way on the west side of the property which.makes access from the adjoining parcel impractical. The driveway has been located as far as practical from the intersection, and is the minimum.required to provide adequate access: Visual clearances will be met. Chapter 18.510 - Residential Zoning Districts ' 18.510020-.List of Zoning Districts C. The site is zoned R-3.5,_ Low-Density Residential District.. Religious Institutions are a conditional use within this zone. • 18.510`.050 - Development' Standards Minimum lot size: 20,000 sq. ft, (modified by chapter 18.330.050,69) Actual lot size: 202,702 sq:'.ft. : Average minimum lot width: 65 ft. Actual lot width: 328 ft. Minimum setbacks: Side facing streets on corner lots: -201ft. Side.yard: 20 ft. (modified by chapter 1:8:330.050,69), Rear yard: 20 ft. (modified by:`chapter 18.330.050,69). Proposed setbacks: Side facing streets: 20 ft. on-110`h; 32 ft:'on Gaarde' Side yard: 381 ft to north, 123 ft to west Maximum height: 30 ft. Proposed height': 30 ft. • 18.510.060 - Accessory Structures No accessory structures are''proposed. Chapter 18.705 = Access, Egress`and Circulation , • 18.705.030 -General Provisions D. Public street access: Three access drives are,proposed. Two on 110`h:and one on Gaarde. The southern access drive on.1.10`h is existing and.will be"retained. One additional driveway will be constructed„to align with SW Garden Park Place as,,requested in the public meeting. The new access on Gaarde is to be located as far from the intersection of 100'h and Gaarde as practical:and' will require an adjustment as-outlined in:Se6tion-18.370 above:, E. Curb' cuts shall,be in accordance with Section%18.810.030N. F. Public sidewalks exist along. both' sides of.1_10`h.Ave. and generally along the north side of Gaarde .St. New concrete walkways,will be constructed as indicated on the site plan to connect all.' FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD CONDITIONAL-USE NARRATIVE buildings to each other, to parking areas and-,to public.ways. Walkways will, be 4 ft: minimum in width exclusive of vehicle, overhangs and,obstructioris and'will comply with ADA standards. For public safety,- walkways crossing parking access drives'.will be clearly marked with contrasting pavements or pavement markings. H. We are proposing to add another access point on SW 110th and to relocate the existing access point on SW Gaarde further to the west to,increase,the:distance,from the intersection' with 110'h Ave. 'Under Phase 1 development, the existing access drives:from SW 110'h: Ave. and SW Gaarde Street will be retained..:. The'proposed new parking lot will add two new access points, one on 1101h and one,on Gaarde. Access widths will be 30 ft., and pavement widths will be 24 ft. . Under Phase-? development, the access to the existing parking lot from Gaar'de, which is closest-to the 110th Ave. intersection, will be removed'. Under Phase 3 development, the*original access from 110'h will-be connected to'the new parking lot, which was constructed under, Phase 11.. Chapter 18.725 - Environrhental. Performance Standards; A. Noise: No excessive noise' will.be generated by this development. . C. Vibrations: No detectable vibrations will be generated by this development. D. Odors:. No.detectable odors will be generated by this development. E. Glare and heat: There will be no discernable heat of glare generated by this development. F..Insects and rodents: Waste and garbage will be handled so as not.to attract insects or rodents, or create a health hazard.' Chapter 18.745 -Landscaping ..andScreening , . I • 18.745.040 - Street Trees: Street trees at 30 ft. on centers will be provided along both 110'h and Gaarde Streets as required 'and as shown on the landscape plan. 18.745.050 - Buffering and Screening: Screening for the parking areas are provided by, hedges as shown on the landscape plan, in accordance with Buffer Matrix' 18.745.1,• Option D,1. Trees will be planted in the landscape islands at the rate of 1 per 7 parking spaces. Chapter 18.765 - Off=Street Parking and Loading' Requirements.,- • 18.765.040 - General Design Standards Parking is based on the total number of seats in the main assembly area. Under phases 1 and 2'. there is no planned expansion 'of the existing 280 seats in the existing sanctuary.. Under phase 3.of the proposed development there will' be a new assembly area constructed which will provide for a maximum of 550.seats.:All new spaces are, 900, standard size. (8.5,x 15.5 ft.:with 3 ft.`bumper, overhangs) Handicapped accessible, spaces, are provided,in accordance with State of Oregon and federal -standards.' P.hase,1 parking: 210 spaces (203 standard, 7•accessible) Phase 2 parking 1773'spaces (167 standard, 6 accessible) .Phase 3 parking: 190 spaces (184 standard;'6 accessible) • 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards: A. Location and access. Bicycle parking'-will be provided near the main entrances to the builildings. Spaces for 14;bicycles'&e required. based on 280 seats in the main sanctuary. 5 spaces will provided under phase 1, 5.additional coveredspace. will be provided under the . entry canopy under phase 2, and 5 ,additional spaces will be provided inside.the new. building under phase 3. C Design' requirements: Bicycle. racks will be steel tube, ribbon type, securely anchored.to the concrete slabs on which they are mounted. 1 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD " CONDITIONAL USE NARRATIVE • 18.765.080 = Off-Street Loading Requirements: This church'facility does,not regularly receive.or distribute material or merchandise, by truck, therefore no, dedicated truck loading area is required. Passenger loading and drop-off.areas are provided. Chapter 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage ; • 18.755.040 -:Methods of Demonstrating Compliance:.. The'church will contract with Pride Disposal Company, a franchise hauler, for trash.remoyal and: recycling. A letter from Pride Disposal Company is attached. Chapter, 18:775 - Sensitive Lands One Water Quality Sensitive Area (WQSA); a perennial tributary to Fanno Creek; occurs in the western portion of the site. The vegetated corridor extends to the entire site west of the tributary. It 'also extends a variable distance (approximately 50 to .70 ft. upslope from the WQSA, depending on alope., The vegetated corridor is listed as "degraded" or "marginal" throughout the site, mainly due to high percent cover by invasive Armenian blackberry. No development is proposed within the required buff er.to the WQSA. A-retaining Wall, be constructed at the west edge of the proposed parking as shown on: civil drawings and as required by Clean Water Services. ; Chapter 18.780 Signs 1 No new signs are proposed 1 Chapter,19.790 Tree Removal ; • 18:790.030-'Tree Plan Requirements An arborist's report and protection plan has been provided which confirms.that the 10 trees that are to be affected by-the proposed,site development are all non-viable trees due to structural defects, dead; dying or diseased. The remaining 33 existing trees, (some of which are non-viable) are to be retained. Therefore,all viable trees .will be retained and protected. New landscaping will add a significant number ofneW trees. Chapter 18.795 - Visual, Clearance Areas As outlined on page 6 of the traffic analysis; the existingand proposed driveway locations on Gaarde Street and SW 11 O.",Ave. have sight distances that exceed AASHTO minimum recommendations. Vision clearance triangles are shown on the Landscape Plan. P t ..Report ' aural Resource A less . N a Ba fist Church Tigard rst p , hington C°unty was ' d~ Oreg°u 6 Prepared for Church Tigard First Bap April .2 2004 CIATES O Q. p EVAN S A N D A s s O: Q D•A V 1 CLEAN WATER SERVICES ' 'Sensitive Areas Certification Property Owner Name Tigard First Baptist Church Address . 11075 SW Gaarde Street City/State/Zip Ti ard,'Ore on 97223 Telephone Fax 503-639-3913 ? E-mail Authorized Agent ' . ' Name Larry Abell- Architect, Inc. > Address .805 SE Sherman St.. City/State/Zip Portland, OR 97214 Telephone Fax 503-231-1122 503-231-0317, E-mail Project Location. A° Street, road, or other descriptive location' 11075 SW Gaarde Street . , Legal Description: Quarter Section Township,, Range' SE 3, 2 South 1,W est . In or near (city or town) County ; Tax Map Tax Lot # Tigard Washington 2S103DC 11'00 Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude Unnamed trib to Fanno Cr N/A 45.41 °N 122.79°W } Adjacent Project Information L. Street, road, or other descriptive location Legal Description: Quarter. Section Township Range In or near (city or town) County . Tax Map # Tax Lot # Waterway River. Mile Latitude Longitude ' An on-site, water-quality-sensitive areas reconnaissance was,completed on:, Date By Title Company 2/11/04 Phil Rickus Ecologist DEA = A. Existence of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas As defined in Section 3.06.1 of the Clean Water Service's Title 3 Compliance/CWS Design 3 and Construction Standards, water-quality-sensitive areas: ®'do ❑ do not exist on site (check appropriate box). t. • If water-quality-sensitive areas exist, complete Section B below. • If water-quality-sensitive areas do not exist, skip Section B,, sign this form and submit to CWS with plan approval package. ' B. Types of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas The type(s) of water-quality-sensitive area(s) that occur on site are (check all that apply): ® wetland(s) ❑ seep(s) ❑ intermittent stream(s) ® perennial stream(s) ❑ ponds Sign this form and submit to CWS with plan approval package'and one (1) copy of. • Wetland Delineation Report (if wetlands occur on site) a Vegetated Corridor Conditions Report, including a base map showing the location of all water-quality-sensitive areas, vegetated corridors, and condition of vegetated corridors I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in. this document, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, this information is true, complete, and accurate. Property Owner: ` PrintrType Name PrintrType Title Signature . Title Date Assessment Rep.0rt N atural Resource First Baptist Church Tigard Washb igton County Tigard, Oregon Prepared for . .;1 Tigaid First Baptist, Church . 11075 SW Gaarde Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Prepared by, David Evans and Associates, Inc. „ y 2100 'SW River. Parkway Portlan d; Oregon 97201 April 23, 2004' Tigard First Baptist Church Natural Resource Asiessnient Report TABLE' OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION...' ' 2 SITE DESCRIPTION 1. , 3 METHODS 1. .4 RESULTS .3 ,.a 4.1 ON-SITE WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS 3 - .3 4.2 OFF-SITE WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS 4.3 VEGETATED CORRIDOR PLANT COMMUNITIES .............::.:.......................::..:...:...:.....................:.............3 . 4.3.1 Description, Location, and Condition:.........,.:...:....... , 4.3.2 Vegetated• Corridor Widths 5 PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION..' 7 6 SUMMARY 8 ' 7 PREPARERS...:..:...: . . ' . ' 9 8 BIBLIOGRAPHY • . 10 APPENDICES APPENDIX A - WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORMS ; APPENDIX B "SITE PHOTOGRAPHS' LIST OF FIGURES . : Figure 1., Project Vicinity • 2 " • J. ti Figure 2. Natural'Resource Assessment Map LIST OF TABLES .as Sam led af:PlotA:.....:.......... Table 1. Ve etated Communif - Table 2.Ve etated y A, as Sain ~ed at Plot 8 . Community 4 „ g 8 P } Table 3.'Vegetated.Community C, as Sampled at PlotC .............:.::........................................................5 April 23, 2004 Page i ` ; 1 regard First Baptist Church Natural Resource Assessment Report 1 'INTRODUCTION The First Baptist Church of: Tigard, Oregon (the church), retained David Evans and j Associates, Inc. (DEA) to evaluate the water quality sensitive areas and vegetated corridor conditions at the church as described in the Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards Manual (CWS 2003). This report evaluates on-site water quality areas and vegetated buffers in accordance with methods outlined in Appendix C, Natural Resource Assessments, of CWS Design and Construction Standards Manual (CWS 2003). The church plans to construct a new j sanctuary and parking lot on Tax Lot 1100. The Standard Site Assessment Method was ,j necessary because the .planned project adds more than 500 square, feet of impervious surface. . 2 SITE DESCRIPTION The project area lies on the corner of Gaarde Street and SW 110`' Avenue in the City of Tigard in Washington County, Oregon. The project is located in Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian: (Figure 1). The study area slopes west toward an unnamed tributary that flows into Fanno Creek approximately one mile to the northeast. A narrow band of wetland, which lies on either side of the creek in places, includes occasional mature or mid-mature red alder (Alms rubra). Young forest dominated by Douglas hawthorn (Crataegus douglasii) lies upslope of the channel in the southern portion, while a mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forest lies upslope of the channel to the north. Armenian (i.e., "Himalayan") blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) - dominates the understory of all areas except the maintained lawn. l A maintained lawn dominated by Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) reaches from the edge "of the forest upslope to the existing church and ,parking areas. Surrounding areas have been converted to commercial and residential uses. Other than the creek and associated forest, the surrounding landscape is dominated by residences and lawns, parking lots, and commercial buildings. 3 METHODS Prior to the field investigation, reference materials were reviewed to provide information .regarding the possible presence of wetlands, water features, hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and site' topography. Soils and wetland inventory maps are included in a separate wetland delineation document. Data -sheets from the wetland delineation are included in Appendix A. The materials reviewed included: y) Beaverton, Oregon, 15 minute Quadrangle, U.S. Geological,Survey (USGS), 1984 • Soil Survey of Washington, County Area, Oregon, U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS), (USDA 1982) April 23, 2004 Page1 1 , Tigard First Baptist Church d "w i ~ / \ 1 ~ Cli} 1.17 Y+'~..'.~ ~ !~~~o', i ~ : ~ Metzger ~ ~ , Pro ect Area a ~e t aT tiu °v4•"d~ •.f sv 1 . n •Z00 r ` •i Jnj of :i•-• «o;:~•• o o f. s• do Project'Area - uoo~~ ~ ~ 400 ~ ~ • _ f ~ _,I Y i y • i 1 .a® 200 ~ C ON A USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Series Beaverton, Oregon 1961, . Figure 1 Vicinity Map . 4 Scale - 1.2 o 4000 C3 Tigard First Baptist Church Natural Resource Assessment Report . • . National Wetlands. Inventory (NWIJ, ••U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (LTSFWS), Beaverton, Oregon, 198,1 • Local Wetland lnventory (LVM, Tigard,. Oregon', 1994 DEA delineated the extent of water quality ,sensitive areas (WQSA),' on June' l0, 2003. The perennial tributary located in the western portion of the study area was investigated, and the channel and associated-wetlands were delineated. Slopes rising from the tributary were measured, tree species and vegetative buffers were analyzed. Plant 'communities were assessed 'at three representative data sample..plots following methods outlined in the,CWS Design and Construction Standards. Manual (CWS 2003):. Adjacent properties. were anaiyzed within 200 feet to determine if any WQSA might' T , require a, vegetative buffer -within" the study area. The entire project" site was `s photographed; hed• selected, site photographs are, included in Appendix B. The remaining , photographs are available fromDEA. 4 RESULTS 4.1 ON-SITE. WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS. The study area slopes west toward an, unnamed, .tributary that, flows into. Fanno Creek approximately one mile to the northeast: Much of the creek is channelized',• but narrow `j patches of wetland lie 'on either side of the, creek in places,, with a few mature or mid- mature red alder growing"af the base of the slope. A portion -of the 'channel,isvisible in, Photo. 2. (Appendix B). The Tigard LWI identifies the tributary as a "USA.Water Quality Buffer," although it does not map the tributary all the way to the southern border of the property, as if exists on site. 4.2 OFF-SITE WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS Adjacent,properties were analyzed to determine if any WQSA might require a vegetative' . -j corridor within the study area. The sensitive.area (tributary) found on the site continues j off-site to the north and south. Therefore, the buffer would. theoretically continue to run 50 feet parallel to creek off the property. However, the off-site buffers would.not change. buffer size within the project area. No springs'or other WQSAs were found which would affect vegetated corridors Within the project area property. 4.3 'VEGETATED CORRIDOR PLANT COMMUNITIES 4.3.9 Description, Location, Wand Condition. . The on-site investigation of vegetated 'corridors within the project study area resulted in the identification of three vegetated communities. The y include: , • Community A. -a scrub forest dominated by 'red alder, Douglas hawthorn, and Armenian blackberry Y April 23, 2004 Page 3 Tigard First Baptist Church Natural Resource Assessment Report • Community B, a forest dominated by Douglas fir and Armenian blackberry Community C, a maintained lawn dominated Eby Kentucky bluegrass A description of each plant community along with a representative species 'list is :j provided below. The location of each community is depioted in Figure 2. 4.3.1.1, Vegetated Community A: Scrub Forest Vegetated Community A is associated with the perennial tributary in the western portion of the property: A strip of young trees less than 20 feet tall exists east of the tributary, consisting mainly of Douglas hawthorn and red alder. Armenian blackberry dominates the understory. Table 1 provides a representative sample plot for Plant Community A, as sampled at Plot A. Other areas identified as Plant Community. A may contain different, though similar, plant species and percentage cover values. All areas identified *as Plant Community A were considered to be in a "degraded" condition due to the lack of canopy cover and presence of greater than 20% cover by invasive species. Table 1. Vegetated Community A, as Sampled at'Plot A. I Scientific Name Common Name % Cover. 'Stratum Status Crataegus douglasii Douglas hawthorn 20 S Native Alnus rubra Red alder 30 S Native Rubus armeniacus Armenian blackberry 60 S Invasive Total 110 Canopy Cover = 0% Non-native, Noxious or Invasive = 55% Condition = Degraded Native = 45% 4.3.1:2 Vegetated Community B: Douglas Fir Forest Vegetated Communit y B lies on both sides of the perennial tributary in ,the western portion of the property. A mature overstory of Douglas fir provides cover for a variety of understory species including Douglas hawthorn, red alder, bitter cherry (Prunus emarginata), and beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta). The 'understory'is dominated by Armenian blackberry, with some trailing blackberry . (Rubus ursinus) and swordfem.(Polystichum munitum). Table 2 provides a representative sample plot for Plant Community B, as sampled at Plot B.-All areas identified as Plant Community B- were considered to be in a "marginal" condition due to the combination of natives covering greater, than 50% but less than 80% of the area, and canopy cover greater. than 26%.. April 23, 2004 Page 4 Tigard First Baptist Church Natural Resource Assessment Report 1 Table 2. Vegetated. Community 8, as Sampled at Plot•B. Scientific Name . Common Name % Cover Stratum Status Pseudotsuga menziesii; Douglas fir 85 T Native Alnus rubra Red alder 5 T Native Crataegus douglasii Douglas hawthorn 5 S Native 60 S Invasive Rubus ammeniacus Armenian blackberry Prunus emarginata Bitter cherry 5 S Native . Corylus comtita Beaked hazelnut 10 S Native Rubus ursinus Trailing blackberry.. 5 H Native Polystichum munitum Swordfem 5 H Native Total 180 Canopy Cover = 90% Non-native, Noxious or Invasive = 33% (601180) Condition = Marginal Native = 67% (1201180) 4.3.1.3 Vegetated Community C: Maintained lawn This vegetated community is dominated by Kentucky bluegrass. A few cultivated trees lie within it, but constitute less. than 1% of the overall area. The grass is mowed and j well-maintained. All' areas identified as Plant Community C were considered to be in a "degraded" condition due, to, the. lack of canopy cover and dominance of non-native species. Table 3 provides a representative sample plot for Plant Community.C, as sampled at Plot C. Table 3. Vegetated Community C, 'as Sampled at Plot C Scientific Name Common Name % Cover Stratum . Status Poe pratensis Kentucky bluegrass 100 H Non-native Total 100 Canopy Cover =.0% Non-native,. Noxious or Invasive = 100% Condition = 'Degraded Native = 0% 4.3.2 Vegetated Corridor Widths Vegetated corridor widths were determined based on the methodology outlined in Chapter 3 of CWS Design and "Construction Standards Manual (CWS 2003). This methodology uses drainage ,area, flow regime (i.e., perennial or intermittent), and the gradient of adjacent slopes to determine vegetated corridor widths. Widths can range w' from. a minimum of 15 feet to a maximum of 200 feet. Apri/23,2004 Page5 7-7 vovo FOR GRAPMI LADED IRON ROD ARE CA Yt P1 ASTiC - 2g Y ONES AND TARE uNES`N my 'mu-0 SOU OSES ONLYROPERY pUR PRESENT p 2 Z9 TO RE 1 230 t v ry ry ry 'b / 232 t a N ry ryry 'L ry , / 232 "E 99.09 5A; .233 589'59'46 t i tf f 1 j i 1' J/ f' J 2254 23d. UN R IRON OD N 7 r~ v J4^ kh j% i i f % 1 - 236 ` E ppTH y 1 t 1' ! / j 1 23 o, _ 237' )/5/ 8~'' pOA p EVENT ~ t 1 `Eat at~ E f; r y, _ ~ryy9 258-.~U6S YELL~jW L S ¢I_~~ 6-"`"" 1 t r+Id~ ' ~RUIt t ! - _ 4'!p KITH.. ~ 1 ~ u 1 ' ' , ' : ' /r''+;. ~;,`'"lam . 221. 239 ' ¢1.,C) J ! •,jf ~%r f r••''y f' ~ • 243., a20 -241-- 10 FIR ~%!,i f / l / 244 -242- 4t3- ,r IF '1 2., / 1 j !r rJ f ~''f -243 GATCHBA54N 2 4 ~MU1~ y , 4" f i r" + + 9✓ , :!t f 1t } ryas' 245 Z FISH f f J; r lr 246 • , 1~ ~ ~a",'F , _ _247 4 46 E 75,2 (i Cl !3"; F7R { ' ~F ' j f: fr ' t ! ! tiR 250 V j } { t l i t'' l.j.i t f 1 ) lNE } yp y. ?S ~ ii,~; irr.''f il, •tl i ((i I 10" ~ ry ~Y BOLT HALL ! I t IVA 'Ps PLO ~p,j q` + (~J f RN SAN VA" ry5y ! } (t , ; f frl ( ; i t1 :t P'. 2~1 P1NE 1 q^ NA NTtf t 1 • M `s. ~rr ! r (,vr!!n^~'i rev c`v 'n w i :i ¢ ' ? ~ j ' _ "kkE.... ` f • "'C"L".. ,.p:. 2•$ i0 % t fN N N N N as , J t : r ' !r NNtN;Nl a~ t , f 1 , : N ~ tla !G S f ! 1 ' t PS4 R dE GONG a RAMP.' >t „ r a L0l y t t AS5 A AF's f ,a N ` ~ ,4 ' t : 1 ' s ~ t ~ _ .''1 t• + ...14^ PIN~,•' I N ~ N ! N PLOT AIR p ~T ! ji t ( U ± i ANDIGAP v i r } J' t.t ; 1 ! ;;r~ `,,f ! 1• ~J tK PARKING - '~~:i P1r0~ I ' (1 r ' } t j ilf ( ! ! sIGNS , ! 7.11 M~UN~~~ : i J r ~ t~•: F1R;' ~ ~ i i ~ , ' ,i , Ii GLEAN0~1T RA,N . ~ ~ CC1 B t , r /fr~rl : 1 35' PVc 1', . i 1 vrP,i+t 4' AREA Q t7 ` ; t1f' , r N~ is SIORM OU 10^ WOE , ~i\ 4 11 l '`t 0,.1 FIR 1 1 ~ v IE~ lF~ ~•i~'i y ~t ! 'j 1 < < ~ i' • KEK Sl'ONE ~ ~ j ~ S% FIR WALL FROOl ' l`1 •11~ 1 '1 " ' ~ ~ { t ~ 1 1 k ~ ' ~ ~ AC f ~ t ~ ; ~ ~ .,y t STEPS y t ! ` .•I,p+; `r`~ ~ 1. ` ,~1 ) 1 `1 ~ i 1''1,~ ' KEG' STO GLEANOVT WALL- 257.17' y 1 1 PwASRoll GAP59D" RLp CE' STEP LLOW TpN LS T. CONC K . gUR 11 8tSR1EF7 R~O - , ; . `;4 FLAS PR T 1 t •i ~ ' f 1 ~ G ' U ; WIDE 5~ GRAS 1 ' 4 1'1 1 ,fats' 4 1 B RtED `;l,t~, 4 't : PS i RE S Asses ` 1 j CLEANO sso%JR :Ot p n AG VRA ' SHOP a,11.. 4 'ANN IM.y NN 1' i T , •.11'111` ; NN N~.NjN N N N N I►`~-sloP J, . 1 ar , , M _ BR- Hi H~i+'' 1 N C ~~MM,,pppp'CO:O N• ~p A WQgD t1, ':11 1~~ ! 1 YI , , f N N NINlN N~N,d rrM~►+P T/ 13OU140I PELAGE q" WIDE CiommuN, 1 1~~ :f1;1 1 ` ' i! I ` WALL PLOT Co)~UN `t'!~ I! y ± BIKE 4"ATM. . :1: 250 WIDE ILWD 'P OZ I,' , r{ t~t~``~ f' 1 j : EASE dEN 1 : : 1 AFL TO ! I i~I7 ! ' ! EPi , 0- ` p RKING ALL BOUNDARY AR 1' I,t.~•'1 ~JA F d r+'~ i~I i I 249 50 w tl4t`'{t rI t r If` ; 1 c',, 249..._.-_. a 25 247 1 r!( 'tf frt' ` 1'~ t ~ 6~ ,•^'M "O ~ ' , ♦ 1 ~ 1/,A1N QRIA ' IRONS CD CAP ^ jrlf j,+j ; pOUNRELLOW PLA 11 5g0 t w~pMPED "T. BURTON. LS S 1 33.15' " 5 g IRON ROD GAP 75.50' YONL~OW PLASTIC sgg•56'00"W ,08,65' p FA R SM'ENT K0. 02 D oc ~wn TIGp,R S~ RESpURCE PRoxcT NATURAL DPJ+~' BY sc PsoxcT a0a1 1:50 DpG. ~FgC ((00- AVID s 10: p8am pA80~,~pTBS 2004 wos,RporPerk~@Y Apr 20, z10psaN+ ~„6r2o, rnent.dw 3 pplre a4 60~ 23.8863 Tigard First Baptist Church Natural Resource Assessment Report The vegetative .corridor within subject property.is.located on either side of the unnamed tributary. The corridor width west of the tributary, is variable' and extends all the way to i the property'boundary. East of the tributary, most of the corridor lies within moderately 1 steep slopes (less than 25%),:and corridor widths are 50 feet. One portion of the forest'. east of the tnutary contains slopes greater than 25%. In this steeper area, the vegetative. corridor is about 70 feet wide and runs above the break in'slope that occurs.at the edge of Vegetated Community B, near the center of the ProPertY. (Figure 2). • 5 PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION. Under Chapter, 3, heading 3.02.05, of,CWS Storm Water and Surface Rules, general enhancement of the vegetated corridor is required whether a project impacts the Vegetated corridor, or not. Rule 3.02.5 d. states that"The Vegetated Corridor shall' be protected and enhanced by' the Applicant in, accordance with the requirements listed in Table 3.2 and Appendix E: Landscape Requirements of CWS Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and ..Surface Water Management: For Vegetated Corridors 50 feet and greater, the first 50 feet closest to the Sensitive. Area shall be upgraded to a condition equal to or better than a `good' corridor condition as defined in Table 3.2... (emphasis added). The condition of the vegetative corridor within subject . property. is 'categorized as . degraded and marginal., Therefore, the entire vegetated corridor.on the, subject property within -50 feet of, the WQSA 'must be improved' per requirements of Table 3.2, which requires the following: Remove any invasive or non-native species within .the corridor by hand . or mechanically I as appropriate (Only small equipment is allowed in Marginal areas, but small equipmerit,would likely be most appropriate in all. areas of the site). r Provide "District or City with.. a native, plant revegetation plan M appropriate to the site conditions developed by an ecologist/biologist or landscape architect to restore to a good corridor condition (emphasis „ added). Vegetate corridor to establish `good' corridor conditions.. In addition, if 'the project encroaches on the vegetated corridor, vegetated' corridor reduction, averaging, and mitigation will need to occur as outlined by CWS (CWS 2003) And will need to be documented in the revegetation plan discussed above. Finally, one portion of. the forest. east-of the tributary contains slopes, greater than 25%. In this steeper area, the, vegetative corridor is about 70 'feet wide and runs above the break in slope that occurs at•the edge of :Vegetated Community B, near the center of the property (Figure 2), It is possible to.modifY the width of the vegetated corridor if it is certified to be, in degraded or marginal "condition. >J April 23,.2004 Page 7 Tigard First Baptist Church Natural Resource Assessment Report :::Where the outside edge of the vegetated' corridor has been set at 35 feet past the, break,in. slope, the 35 feetmay be reduced to 15 feet providing that the remaining Vegetated`-Corridor is.not less'.than.50-feet wide and a stamped geotechnical report' confirms slope stability 'can be maintained, with the reduced setback' from the break in, slope. x In this case, a. portion of, Community C that'currently extends' 35 feet, from the break in slope' may. be, reduced to "15.. feet from,"the" break in slope line with `a stamped geotechnical"report..However, the corridor cannot be reduced to less than the'minimum 50.feet,without corridor averaging. 6 SUMMARY One WQSA; a perennial tributary to Fanno Creek,'"occurs in,the westerri.portion of the study area. The vegetated corridor extends 'to., he entire subject property west of the K? tributary. it also extends a variable'distance-(approximately 50 to 70 feet upslope (east) from :the .WQSA, depending on slope, (Figure '2). A portion of Community _ C that 'i currently extends 35'feet from the break in slope may be reduced to 15 feet from the break in slope line With a stamped geotechnical report. Vegetated corridor condition is " listed as Degraded' or Marginal throughout. the project area;'mainly due to-high percent cover, by invasive Armenian blackberry. - T PREPARERS Phil Rickus, DEA Ecologist, and Joe Zimmerman; ,DEA Environinental. Specialist, performed the site asses sment.'Mr. •Rickus„is`'.the principal author of this report. Kevin ' O'Hara, Provided Total Quality Management' reviews of 'this,report.• Sharon, Johnson, ;j DEA Project Assistant, edited all report drafts. Melissa, Foltz, DEA Project Assistant; 'provided the report graphics: Preparer Reviewer April 23, 2004 " Page 8 Tigard First Baptist Church Natural Resource Assessment Report 8 BIBLIOGRAPHY Environmental Laboratory. 1987: Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. . : Technical Report Y-87=1; US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,..,. Vicksburg, Mississippi. Oregon'Department of Agriculture. Oregon's Quarantine'Againsi,Noxious Weeds. Accessed on the intemet, June 12, 2003..' http://www.oda.st'atc.or.us/Plant/weed ' controVweedlistcommon.html Clean Water Services (CWS). 2003. Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management.',' Sutherlin Local Wetland Inventory (LWl), Tigard, Oregon. 1994 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service. 1982. Soil Survey of ) Washington County, Oregon. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (USFWS) Office of Biological Services. 1992. National Wetlands Inventory, Hillsboro, Oregon, quadrangle map. ' 1981. Ndtional•'Wetlands Inventory,. Beaverton, Oregon. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services. U.S. Geological-Service (USGS). 1984. Beaverton; Oregon, 15 minute Quadrangle. 0:\PROJECnT\Tfbc0000-0001.\!DOCS\907 Natural Resource Assessment\FINALtfbcNRAS~pt,doc Page 9 April 23, 2004:. , Tigard First Baptist Church , Natural Resource Assessment Report APPENDICES April 23, 2004 Page 10 j Tigard First Baptist Church Natural Resource Assessment Report APPENDIX A WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORMS , April 23, 2004 DATA FORM' ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manua 041 . ~ ~5'GI`"~~tf.~st , . ~ a 0 .K I. ; r~C.:: ~.-:k a 's • 'a..~ ra r ~•A:.' u:. 10 Applicant/Owner: Tigard First Baptist Church Coun : Washington Investigator: Joe Zimmerman, Phil Rickus State: Oregon Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transact ID: Is Area a Potential Problem Area? ❑ Yes No Plot ID: 1 ATION ron~ rr.~y~ t lr •r : 9""F,y: wry a^ w' i.w«N u !i it~al~lf'~.T5r"R2.YI, ~'♦l~ n a Ay ~4...t ~Fl ..d _ Vo~ J,-~ :Y•1 • 1 ❑ 1 ® Phalaris arundinaceal FACW 100 2 ❑ 2 ❑ Ranunculus repens FACW 5 3 ❑ 3 ❑ i A 4 4 ❑ Total Tree Cover: , 5 • ❑ 1 1Rubus armenlacus. FACU 15 7 ❑ 2 ® Alnusrubra FAC 5 8 ❑ 3 ❑ g ❑ i 4 ❑ 10 ❑ j 5 ❑ Total Herb Cover 100 Total Sap/Shrub Cover: 20 % of Dom. Species =OBL, FACW or. FAC excluding FAC-): 66 Plot lies at the base of a slope adjacent to a small creek. Remarks: HYDROLOGY ❑ Recorded Data (describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: . ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Prima Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): ❑ Aerial Photographs ❑ Inundated ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" ❑ Other ® Saturated in Upper 12 inches ❑ WaterStained Leaves ® No recorded data available ❑ Water Marks ❑ Local Soil Survey Data Field' Observations: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ FAGNeutrai Test Depth of Surface Water. None (In) .0 Sediment Deposits ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 (In.) ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands ❑ J Depth to Saturated Soil: 4 (In.) ' Remarks: `J SOILS Ma Unit Name series and Phase : Cove sitty clay loam Drainage Class: Poorly drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Feld Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Y19. N ❑ Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance] Depth nches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Size/Contrast Texture Concretions, Structure, etc. 0-16 10YR 3/2 7.5YR 4/6 man /coarse/distinct Silty clay loam H ric Soil Indicators: r1Histosol ® Redox Features (wrin 10") ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer. in Sandy Soils ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ® Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Concretions (wrin.3", >2mm) ® Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ' ❑ Other (explain in remarks) . Remarks: j WETLAND DETERMINATION 43`€:' F.. 'S'~i7Fo4 f.'RF,3a •YY 'YI6-E.'' .@'.,s'L'7F: .4~F26 e%t•• AA1 •:+}.it1 .li4S: ^A iY'~' aFS#' 9s'PII 61119 ~'3Fk". F.l. MTi f'T, ;t~n.7i31i. KllAlfl iYE 3ft1 i 9" 27'i'Y mew i( ,t wl F i*,ry, M.lt r ♦ k' ! Nn' • "xbS 9 1 Y R ah ` :+R^ i 911 _ ►3 I . ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ . 4 41._ia"P:ie;.~1?x 'pest a ♦jFf~fia" ♦ - « mon"wol ` r ten♦ Y"e f~NU t ` o~t~y{ 5 ~I.s 1~F~ ~S ~ 'i4 ~.Z..c. e~ ~ .t lq® `S. YS 1 4'' C •:r•~• All .I u' .Ya.•1 M~1'.j`~, 't~ti :.rl4'1' oYS` ♦!FP.. ..,~~i a . `t"Lxn,:'C1 .:.io..•s^,7t, 3S?L'°C ?.'e<u :x . ~ C~•+c•1c~.+?• F~:,-+~7 1- ,...y.yv..:SF? k t # ' ~kFt~'. , i n ~txs~ 'S " Remarks: J ,.3 O:IPROJEC7I7)TFB00000-0001iDOCS1918 WETLAND DELINEATIONIDATA SHEETSITFBCPLOT 01 W.DOC DATA FORM- ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION J1 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation. Manual .1 Q Ap IicanUOwner: Tigard First Ba bst Church Coun : Washington Investigator. Joe Zimmerman, Phil Rictus State: Oregon } Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID: Is the site significant) disturbed (Atypical Situation ? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID: Is Area a Potential Problem Area? ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID: 2 3 1 Pseudotsuga menziesii UPL 70 . 1 ® Polyskhum munitum Y1 FACU 20 ~ 2 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 4 ❑ Total Tree Cover 70 5. ❑ 1 ® Rubus armeniacus FACU : 50 7. ❑ 2 . ❑ Crataegus douglasii FAC 10 8 ❑ 3 9 ❑ 4 ❑ 10 ❑ 5 ❑ Total Herb Cover 20 Total Sap/Shrub Cover: 60 % of Dom. Species =OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-):. 0 Plot lies upslope of a small creek. Remarks: HYDROLOGY 1 ❑ Recorded Data (describe in Remarks) Welland Hydrology Indicators:* ❑ Stream, Lake, or ride Gauge Prima Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): ❑ Aerial Photographs ❑ Inundated ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" ❑ Other ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 inches ❑ Water-Stained Leaves ® No recorded data available ❑ Water Marks ❑ Local Soil Survey Data Feld Observations: .0 Drift Lines ❑ FAC-Neutral Test Depth of Surface Water. None (In) ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Depth to Free Water in Pit:' >16 (in.) ❑ Drainage Pattems,in Wetlands 11 . . Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (In.) 1 Remarks: SOILS Ma Unit Name series and Phase : Woodburn silt loam Drainage Class: Moderately wellArained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Feld Observations Confine Mapped Type? Y ® N ❑ ' Matrix Color Mottle Colors Motile Abundance/ Depth inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Size/Contrast Texture, Concretions Stricture, etc. 11 0 16 10YR 312 none none Sift loam 1 ;)1 H ric Soil Indicators: ❑ Histosoi ❑ Redox Features twin 10-) ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils Ust ❑ Sulfdic Odor [I Concretions (wfin 3', >2mm) ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils , ❑ Other'(expiain in remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION wnu~.xrt tr~•n r~rt~cr ue . xtn,.aae~ ~uahrNCav r a ~ a ~ ns~2as}., sheers: a_,<_ a~ - 4 . "NCiCRt0.Ht v , YfR Y„v.W. k dC.'^.'<Y . 3t' Q Ilan . !t!~ .1 J'~' ~ .~~'i~~l. .w t114NY1• r a® a~W3W,!~~6 t I t ♦ ~^'3- .1 / ~ i k ~Y t~ ' . .3.T , - ¢ . IKWI lei T. 11,7WIR 111RN.AICV b T~,a.. a .t,, x ~sn.; ...1 r;F a xef • 4,r,; .il tk•. ..'t .r7r r:...,. ! ",R Y. siie5i#.'"3$1 Remarks. O:IPROJEC7ITITFB00000-0001 L/DOCS1918 WETLAND DELINEATIONIDATA SHEETSITFBCPLOT 02 U.DOC j DATA FORM- ROUTINE WETLAND'DETERMINATION t 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual WON Ap Iicant/Owner. Tigard First Baptist Church County: Washington Investigator. Joe Zimmerman, Phil Rickus State: Oregon' I Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ❑ No . Community ID: } Is the site significantly disturbed Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID:. Is Area a Potential Problem Area? ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID: 3 ATION r to YE i a `Viii CANNON 1 ❑ 1. ® Phalaris arundinacea FACW 90 2 ❑ 2 'Ranunculus repens. FACW 25 3 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 4 ❑ 1 Total Tree Cover: 5 ❑ '~Sh , .efr~ ..yt. - arlc~"~r 6 ❑ ~ 1 ® Rubus armeniacus FACU 15 7 ❑ . 2 ❑ 8 ❑ 3 ❑ 9 ❑ 4 ❑ 10 ❑ 5 11 Total Herb Cover :115 Total Sap/Shrub Cover. 15 % of Dom. Species =OBL; FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 66 Plot lies at the base of a slope adjacent to a small creek Remarks: I HYDROLOGY } ❑ Recorded Data (describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Prima Indicators: Secondary.lndicators (2 or more required): / ❑ Aerial Photographs ❑ Inundated ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12' ❑ Other Saturated in Upper 12 inches ❑ - Water-Stained Leaves ® No recorded data available ❑ Water Marks ❑ Loral Soil Survey Data Field Observations: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ FAC-Neutral Test Depth of Surface Water. None (In.), ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Depth to Free Water in Pit- >16 (In.) ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands ❑ Depth to Saturated Soil. at surface . (In.) Remarks: SOILS , Ma Unit Name series and Phase : Cove silty clay loam Drainage Class: Poorly drained Taxonomy Sub rou : Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Y ® N ❑ Matrix Color' Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance) Depth nches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc. 0-16 10YR 3/2 7.5YR 4/6 man /coarse/distiinct Silty clay loam ric Soil Indicators: High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils O Histosol ® Redox Features (wrn 10') 511q ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Listed on National Hydric Soils List' ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Concretions (wrin 3", >2mm) Lis ted on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Other (explain in remarks) Remarks: . WETLAND DETERMINATION fist RWf+Lli4~. MM1 p ♦r~ 5T r•1• 3.+13C'~.{SN "1T2 k3'~4x'7ta~f:. 1-.y1'.Sd {~'S Y~ay^l, 4 fY'1iu^k. "+i tKC 1'dKW AXE X •YL a `S'3~^ T d :.J. 4"Ai`~-t ` i5.. ' J' '1 ^ I 1 , K I~ i I i Y "M1l 'J 'E ^ I a~ 1 ! ~ .L W fGPV~iv ~ Cilt Siel I.4 4 " x` y ``,`~ana ofd toy RM lZilVe W?:~ gln ;~6+(G.~ •.Ir;fteS~~~t~ 1~ 2 ~ r 2 ~ a r M ~ ai'C a i -i e!5 °+:,Sd y.+.. .•ik 'f:. ,.x °,tY"w'.R , ui. .`a+.++~3.tt?s'~^':7."'t,~:: 'F 4x`idx. -S Remarks: O:IPROJECTTITFB00000-0001 LrDOCS1918 WETLAND DELINEATIONIDATA SHEETSITFBCPLOT 03 W.DOC } t DATA FORM- ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Applicant/Owner I'M ~ MIN Ift, Tigard First Baptist Church County: Washington i Investigator: Joe Zimmerman, Phil. Ridws State: Oregon " Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID: } Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID: Is Area a Potential Problem Area? Yes N No Plot ID: 4 ' VEQETATION TOM= ME 19 1 WON M, Pseudotsuga menzieso UPL 80 1 Polystichum munitum FACU .5 2 3 4 ❑ T04 Total Tree Cover: 80 5 ❑ i 1 N Rubus armernacus FACU . 50 7 ❑ 2 ❑ 8 ❑ • 9 ❑ 4 4 0 10 ❑ 5 ❑ Total Herb Cover 5 Total Sap/Shrub Cover.' 50 % of Dom. Species =OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC- : 0. Plot lies upslope of a small creek. Remarks: . j HYDROLOGY ❑ Recorded Data (describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Prima Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): .11 Aerial Photographs ❑ Inundated ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" ❑ Other ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 inches ❑ Water-Stained Leaves ® No recorded data available ❑ Water Marks ❑ Local Soil Survey Data Field Observations: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ FAC-Neutral Test Depth of Surface Water. None (In.) ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Depth to Free Water in PH: >16 (in.), ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands ❑ Depth to Saturated Sol: >16 (In.) Remarks: JI SOILS Ma Unit Name series and Phase : Woodburn silt loam Drainage Class: Moderately well-drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Y ® N ❑ a Matrix Color (=Colors Mottle Abundance/ Depth nches Horizon Munsen Maist Munsell Moist Size/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure. etc 0-16 10YR 3/2 none none Silt loam H dric Soii Indicators: ❑ Histosol ❑ Redox Features (wrin lo*) ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ' Sulfidic Odor ❑ Concretions (wrin 3', >2mm) ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List O Aquic Moisture Regime El Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION 1tlt~'?!f~ 1i S:T.'fK Y'kG3 slY'.K L fAV0.'7 `FP'.F}it'~C +3'YtiM' ::}6T6f'1."FYlY' .d$74t4 +i Fa"i.-f~!R44^7~"^ 'trd'?~1"'L'tt~ ~•C' Nf'~i:s bNN. J#' e 4 `A!C31^! tLY "RM:.'l:bi y~ ff t ~r d~-^'+k..+3 t'hK✓Y hK'r• 1~5t 2 ~C'd S k„vCl tY ' 8~c'llOI1PI@Sf'F1'~rd 1r is 4'i.9t t'.~ fl t t11 y, liltlf~ uj~~_ d.~oCo :Pt~e~s~`errf,~?v'~'.'"~ ~ ~ t~s f :.~.Fs ~ ~ • , :.;F 'r xx ..xa'~f~g~ .;raz yy 4 " xy t` s ,k ' •~°~4. L. Y;-`.,V~~OIIwl~7F.Fl'eS~~ `a.,y ~ waw.V'sl .r e g - '€c • ".'W'YaT,R:.t? S3'.. b1tH '.'!'rRF' v; ?x S?'? _2, a,Y. ~:~s -;.<,G ? ^h...L,3;`.r's~ a2Yn ."S .~'F{f9.G,4, '~"%c;'t Yl , +:n? .!F , t ~ n'+ ,SdtiHDA'•. ""at`w.i, ~9i+;iti+Wkx. uEZk .durf: Remarks: ' Yl O:IPROJECTITITFBCOOOO-0001 LrDOCS1918 WETLAND DELINEATIONIDATA SHEETSITFBCPLOT 04 U.DOC DATA FORM- -ROUTINE WETLAND,DETERMINATION 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual y~ Applicant/Owner Tigard First Baptist Church County: Washington Investigator. Joe Zimmerman, Phil Rickus State: Oregon Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID: i Is-the site significant) disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes No Transect ID:' Is Area a Potential Problem Area? ❑ Yes ® No : Plot ID: 6 1 ® Pseudotsuga rrienziesli UPL 80 1 ® Polysfichum munltum ' FACU • 10 2 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 . ❑ 3 ❑ 4. ❑ 4 11 Total Tree Cover:, . 80 5, ❑ 1 ® Rubus armen(acus FACU 50 7 11 2 Corylus comuta FACU 20 8 ❑ 3 ❑ 9'. ❑ q ❑ 10 5 ❑ Total Herb Cover 10 Total Sap/Shrub Cover: 70, % of Dom. Species =OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 0 Plot lies upslope of a small creek. Remarks: ' ; • HYDROLOGY ❑ Recorded Data (describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Prima Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):„ 11 Aerial Photographs, ❑ Inundated ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" 11 Other ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 inches - ❑ Water-Stained Leaves ® No recorded data available ❑ Water Marks ❑ Local Soil Survey Data .Field Observations:. ❑ Drift Lines ❑ FAC-Neutral Test Depth of Surface Water. None (in.) Sediment Deposits Other (explain, in remarks) r . Depth to Free Water in Pit: • >16 . (In.) ❑ . Drainage-Patterns in Wetlands ❑ Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (In:) Remarks:. „ SOILS Ma Unit Name series and Phase : Woodburn silt loam Drainage Class:' Moderately well-drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Y0 N [I Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ D th inches Horizon Munsell Mast Munsell Moist Size/Contrast Texture Concretions, Structure, etc. 0-16 10YR 3/3 none none Silt loam :a H oil Indicators: ❑ . Histosol ❑ Redox Eeatures'(wmn 10-) ❑ . High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors , Wed on National Hydric Soils List 11 ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ . Concretions (w/in 3", >2mm) -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List } ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ . Other (explain in remarks) ,y Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION ~ iRe"1blYkMliWdk3' 0 ~ W 'Y ''YLa 'eHtr'}h+t)6i{fnL9v'L..t14 m ;ik L 'A.Jd` zSA. ~ ~.---.rte a'b" .f - Hf lhY."d~."'L4$ w i~ ~d5.~ ~~"i.kd `4an s - X r a try, r~ ,e Ibrt P~esen fs`thls'Sam tin Polnt Vtftth►c a;Wetland? ~H'd6rl~serr~t? c bj ~~4'~ 'I)lo „ k „.~8 'k: .r •1 S,u Y! r ti£' r;t. _ 4 `M ;ts°. a">r"s S; - Remarks: 0:1PROJECTI7ITFB00000-00011tDOCS1918,WETLAND DELINEATIOMDATA SHEETSITFBCPLOT 06 U.DOC Natural Resource Assessment Repot rgard First Baptist Church . H4TQGRAPHS APPENDIX B 2004 SITE P April 23, ' 1/,•.~t.. 'nom . R:• Photo 1: Vegetated.CommunityA, looking northeast from near the.southern property boundary ' ~ • `off e ~ • arcs:' wr. ~.~dt'~!~? '{:ifr~~a~i~~'4'~.~.~:..?..i."~~~►d 6~',.a"1~~\1N , Photo I Vegetated Community B to right and left of tributary channel, looking north Appendix B- Site Photographs ' . I } unit Bin the background, looking nohwest in the foreground, Comm y etated Community C arking lot. Photo 3: Veg and downslope from the church p Appendix B- site Photographs Y PSIS :RtppRT : TRAFFIC ANAL s .FOR " TtST CH RCH ,T1GARD.FIRST^ BAP. P Y' ;Gaarde Street' CITY OF TiGARD PREPARE6 BY )NN EN NtERIN APRIL 2004 i : pROJFcr 04-44 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT. FOR TIGARD.FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH Gaarde Street CITY OF TIGARD PREPARED BY E fiColl" Charbonneau Engineering LLC. a0' ORC 9370 SW Green burg Rd., Suite 411, Portland, OR 97223 (503) 293-1118 -FAX, (503) 293-1119 E.`ffARBO'~ EXPIRES: 12134105 APRIL 2004 PROJECT 04A.4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................1 SITE DESCRIPTION, STREETS, AND CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS .......................1 -DRIVEWAY SPACING 2 TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION .................................................................................3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................4 SIGHT DISTANCE ...........................:................................................................................6• LEFT TURN LANE WARRANTS 6 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ACCIDENT HISTORY 61 PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLES, & BUSES ..........................................................................7 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................:...........:...............:......7 APPENDIX 8 • Vicinity Map Figure a • Site Plan Figure b . Lane Configurations and Traffic Control Figure c • Traffic Flow Diagrams figure 1 ' 2004 Existing Traffic (weekday AM & PM and Sunday peak hours) Figure 2 2009 Background Traffic Figure 3 Trip Distribution Figure 4 Trip Assignment Figure 5 2009 Total Traffic . • Traffic count data Left Turn Lane Warrant Worksheets . • Peak Hour Signal Warrant • Accident History Summary (furnished by the Oregon Department of Transportation) Traffix Capacity Analysis Worksheets INTRODUCTION This traffic study has been prepared to document and evaluate the traffic operation and safety conditions at the First Baptist Church in Tigard, Oregon- in association with the planned expansion. The study area was defined as the surrounding neighborhood, including Gaarde Street and SW 110th Avenue. The church is surrounded by developedresidential properties to the north and west, Gaarde Street to the south, arid" SW 110th Avenue to, the east. The site is located at 11075 SW Gaarde Street and is highlighted on the vicinity map (Figure 'a") in . • • . the appendix. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS In the project scope established with City of Tigard §taff, a number of important elements were identified and considered in this study. • Inventory and record pertinent. information such as traffic control devices, circulation patterns; lane widths, pedestrian & bicycle facilities, school bus zones, parking conditions; and street 'characteristics: • Record data on typical weekdays during the AM and PM peak traffic hours and on a typical Sunday during the peak hour of the church. • Conduct traffic counts at Gaarde Street and SW 110th Avenue, the site driveway and Gaarde' Street, and the site driveway and SW F10th Avenue. • Level of service (LOS) analysis of the study intersections to measure the approach . . delays for comparison to City of Tigard standards. • Verification of intersection-` sight distance at the church's existing and proposed driveway locations. • Review of traffic accident data furnished by Oregon-Department of Transportation staff and determination of the intersection crash rates at the. study intersections. . • . Consideration of traffic circulation. SITE DESCRIPTION, STREETS, AND CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS The proposed'church expansion and remodel will include building additions totaling 34,700 :square feet (sq. ft.). Development of the site will also include removal of the existing 2;100 sq. ft. Bolt Hall, located on the north side of the property. Figure 'b' illustrates the proposed site plan. The nearby roadways currently have two lanes. Gaarde Street, between SW 121` Avenue and Highway 99W, is currently being improved by, the City of Tigard. Improvements include upgrading -Gaarde" Street, a, two-lane roadway to a three=lane roadway (a travel lane in each direction and a'center.left turn lane) and one bike lane. With these improvements Gaarde Street will be reclassified. as an arterial. ' Charbonneau_ Tigard First Baptist Church. April 14, 2004 Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard 2 SW 110'' Avenue currently has two lanes and sidewalks, generally provided on both sides of the road. SW 110'' Avenue is classified as a local street: Gaarde Street and SW 110'hAvenue is a two-way stop-controlled tee-shaped: intersection. Sidewalks are provided on the.northwest and northeast corners. The existing and future lane configurations and traffic control are presented in Figure `c.' in the report's appendix. Currently, the Gaarde Street at SW 11Avenue intersection. and the site driveways are unsignalized. DRIVEWAY SPACING City of Tigard access, egress, and circulation code (18.705.030 113.) identifies that the minimum driveway spacing along an arterial shall be 600 feet. Tigard First Baptist Church currently has two full-movement driveways. The first driveway provides access to SW 110'' Avenue and, is located approximately 305 feet north of Gaarde Street, measured near-edge to near-edge; the second driveway provides access to Gaarde Street and is located approximately 80 feet west of SW 110'' Avenue, measured near-edge to near-edge. Both driveways are proposed to remain with the planned. expansion and remodel. The parking spaces adjacent to easterly Gaarde Street driveway are expected to be used primarily by weekday administrative staff as the spaces will not connected to the church's. new parking lot.. Two additional full-movement. driveways are proposed with site redevelopment. The first proposed driveway would provide access to SW 110'' Avenue and would be located approximately 515 feet north of Gaarde Street, directly across from the northerly, approach of the Garden Park Place loop; the 'second driveway would provide access to Gaarde Street and would be located approximately 220 feet west of SW H& Avenue. 'The church's Gaarde Street frontage is limited to approximately 325 feet, measured from the west edge of SW 110'hAvenue and the west edge of the property. Based on the length of the Gaarde Street site frontage neither driveway to Gaarde Street will meet the City of Tigard's spacing standard, regardless of where they. are placed. With full buildout of the church the eastbound left turn movement is expected to operate at :level of service "A" during the weekday AM and PM peak hours and during the Sunday midday peak hour. This, access will allow church traffic to circulate through the site and will lighten the queue lengths that would develop on SW 11& Avenue if the proposed Gaarde ..Street driveway was not provided. Development of this access will also minimize the impacts to the Gaarde Street and SW 110' Avenue intersection. Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard 'TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS In order to evaluate traffic flow, and delay in the area the Gaarde Street and SW I le Avenue .'intersection and the existing site, driveways to Gaarde, Street and SW 110' Avenue.were analyzed for level of service (LOS). conditions and'safety. LOS analyses were completed in the weekday AM and PM peak hour and Sunday peak hour periods forAhe following scenarios: • 2004 Existing Traffic • 2009 Background Traffic. • 2009 Total Traffic For analysis purposes the.intersection capacity calculations and the traffic flow maps in the report's appendix, illustrate one driveway to.each ofthe,SW l,le Avenue and Gaarde Street . roadways. Distribution of the site generated trips with two site driveways, rather than the four site driveways proposed with, site .buildout,will. allow the,worst-case scenario to be considered: In order to perform the. LOS analysis at the critical intersections manual traffic counts were ` conducted -during the weekday AM peak (7:00-9:00 AM); weekday PM peak (4:00-6:'00 PM), and Sunday peak (930711:30 AM) traffic hours: The weekday. and Sunday counts were conducted in February 2004, before- Gaarde Street was.closed for construction. Figure 1 illustrates the existing volume data for the weekday peak' and Sunday peak hours. City staff have identified that zero in-process projects are planned currently ,that may affect the study area intersections. Background growth is comprised -of the'existing,t ' c factored with a traffic growth rate : established by'the City. For this project City staff estimated a traffic growth rate of 1.5% per year over a five-year buildout scenario. Background traffic volumes, the sum of existing, traffic and background growth, are illustrated in Figure.2 in the report's appendix. The 2009 total traffic is the summation of background traffic volumes and site generated'., traffic. The. peak hour volumes are presented in Figure 5. . VEHICULAR.TRIP GENERATION ;Trip rate s.presented in the Institute, of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation ' . Manual, Seventh Editiori, were utilized to estimate the site's trip generation. Specifically, Church (ITE 560) trip rates were applied to estimate the trips generated by the proposed 43;915 square`foot church during the weekday AM and PM peak and Sunday peak hours.. Table 1 presents the trip generation estimate for the existing 11,3 15 squarefoot church. Table 2 presents the net increase in trip generation based on the increase of church square footage. Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 " Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report.' Gaarde Street, Tigard 4 Table 1. Projected trip generation for the existing Tigard First Baptist Church. Units Weekday Sunday ITE Land Use (sq.ft.) ADT AM Peak Hour PM.Peak Hour ADT Peak Hour Total Enter 'Exit Total.' Enter'.- Total Enter Exit Church (#560) 11,315 Generation Rate' 9,11 ' 0.72. 54% 46% 0.66, 52%. ` 48% 36.63 11.76 50% 50% Site Trips 103. 8 5 3., 7 4. •3., 414 133 67 66 • ' Source: Trip Generation; 7th.Edition, ITE, 2003, average.rates except Sunday,Peak (generator). Table 2:_ Net Increase in trip generation based on church square footage increase. Units: Weekday : 'Sunday fTE Land Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Peak Hour (sq.ft.) ADT Total Enter. E)at Total ' Enter Exit ADT Total Enter Exit Church,(#560) 32,600 Generation' Rate' 9.11 .0.72 54%,46% 0.66 _ 52% 48% 36.63 11.76 50% 1 50% Site Trips 297 " 23 - 13 10 22, 12 10 1194, 383 192 191 ' Source: Trip Generation ; 7th Edition, ITE, 2003, average:rates except Sunday Peak (generator). ` . The proposed expansion and remodel 'of Tigard First Baptist.Church is expected to generate. an additional 23 weekday AM peak, 22 weekday PM peak; and 383' Sunday peak hour trips. Trip distribution is based on existing traffic patterns at the site driveways, observations made at the site, and engineering judgment. Figure 3 illustrates the trip distribution for the:weekday AM and PM peak and Sunday peak hours: Figure 4,!illustrates the.corresponding trip, assignments: CAPACITY ANALYSIS , Capacity analyses were performed: to, determine the levels of service for the weekday peak, and. Sunday peakhours. Analysis of the 2009 background traffic and 2009 total traffic scenarios considers the future improvements to GaardeStreet: Traffix software (Version 7,5) was used to :determine the'level of service for each.scenario considered. The program is based on the 2000 Highway.,Capacity Manual methodology. Table 3 summarizes the analysis results. Copies, of the capacity analysis calculations are included in the appendix.. , . Table 3 indicates that the study intersections will continue~to operate at level of service "C" " or better through.the.five-year buildout,period. This intersection operation meets or,exceeds City of Tigard'.s,level of service standard for unsignalized intersections and, thus-intersection improvements are not necessary.,:. , Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church. Aprit.:14, 2004 Engineering LLC. Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde'Street, Tigard Table 3. Summary of capacity analysis for study intersections. Traffic Scenario Type of 2004 Existing 2009 Background 2009 Total In Control Peak Hour VION(t LOS Delay. Crit. LOS Delay Crit. LOS Delay Mot , Mott Mott Weekday AM, SB B 14.7 SB B 12.1 SB B 12.3 Site Driveway and Two-way Gaarde Street Stop- Weekday PM_ . SB C 18 SB B 13.0. SB B 13.0 controlled Sunday SB B , 12.5 SB 8 10.9 SB B 12.6 Weekday AM SB C 18.5 SB B 13.7 SB B 13.9 Gaarde Street and Two-way SW 110th Avenue Stop- Weekday PM SB C 17.4 SB B 13.8 SB . B' 14.0 controlled Sunday, SB B' 12.7 SB B . 11.3 SB C 16.9 Weekday.AM WB C .10.4 WB B 10.5 WB B .10.9 Two-way Driveway and SW 110th Avenue . Stop- Weekday PM WB A . ' 9.1 WB ,A 9.1 WB. A 9.1 controlled Sunday WB A 9.3 WB A 9.3' WB B, 14.3 I Notes: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual methodology used.in analysis. SB - Southbound, WB - Westbound, Crit. Mott - Critical movement or critical approach. Generally, LOS `B', `C', and `D' are desirable service levels ranging from no vehicle, delays to average or longer than average delays in the peak hours. Level `E' represents:long delays indicating signalization warrants need to be reviewed and signals considered only if, warrants are met.. Level `F' indicates that intersection improvements, such as widening and signalization, may be required. According to the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), the following delay times are associated with the LOS at-stop controlled (unsignalized) and signalized intersections. Level of Service criteria defined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Level of Service Unsignalized Control Signalized Control (LOS) Stopped Delay (sec/veh) Stopped Delay (sec/veh) A 10 . < 10 B > 10 and 5 15 > 10 and 5 20 C > 15 and :5 25 > 20 and :5 35 D >25and535 >35and555 E >35and550 - >55and<80 F >50>80 Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard 6 SIGHT DISTANCE AASHTO identifies that sight distance provided at intersections`.allows. drivers to perceive thepresence of potentially conflicting vehicles and gives the motorist sufficient time to stop or..adjust theinspeed and'avoid colliding in the intersection. Sight distances from the existing and proposed driveway locations were reviewed in field. Table 4 identifies AASHTO's minimum sight distance recommendations and the sight. distance availability. Table 4. Sight distance summary. .Speed, AASHTO Distance Intersection Location Direction . a ' Lanes Recommendation 'Available Gaarde Street access 80 feet west of 25 mph, To West 295 feet >1000 feet , (existing) SW I I Dt6 Avenue 3 lanes . To. East 240 feet 425 feet Gaanie Street access 220 feet west of ' 25 mph, To West 295 feet >850 feet (proposed) SW 110th Avenue 3 lanes To East •'240 feet' 475 feet SW 110th Avenue access 305 feet north of 25 mph, To North 240 feet 245 feet (existing) . Gaarde Street 2 lanes.:To:South 280 feet 320 feet SW 110th Avenue access. 515 feet north of. 25 mph, To North 240 feet. 550-feet (proposed) . Gaarde Street 2 lanes ' To South 280 feet 450 feet The existing and proposed dri veway locations to Gaarde Street'8W-11Avenue have sight: distances that exceed AASHTO's minimum recommendations: LEFT TURN. LANE WARRANTS Left turni lane warrants were reviewed fof the northbound approach of the °site,driveway.to SW .11.0' Avenue. The analysis indicates that a left turn lane is not warranted., The left turn lane warrant homographs. are included in the report's appendix'.' TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS The' peak hour signal warrant presented in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUMMM was reviewed at the Gaarde'Street and SW 110 'Avenue intersection. Based on the low peak hour traf.ic.volumes, signalization is not warranted at this intersection., ACCIDENT HISTORY-, Accident data for the Gaarde Street and SW 1.10t' Avenue intersection was obtained from Oregon Department of Transportation staff and was reviewed to help identify. any traffic. safety problems: Charbonneau' ` Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde.Street, Tigard • ♦ " / The accident rate presented in Table 5 below is.based'.on the number of accidents per'million entering vehicles (MEV). Typically, an intersection is not considered unsafe unless its accident rate exceeds the threshold, of 1.0 accidents per MEV. Table 5. Accident,rate results for study intersection. Acciddent, Annual Accident Intersection • Number of Accidents'' Traffic: History, rate per (Years], -Accidents'. per yeas . Entering M.E.V.• (veh/yr) Gaarde Street and SW 110th Avenue 5 ,1.• 0:2, 3721796 0.054 KEN, -,million entering vehicles. The. Gaarde Street and SW' 110' ;Avenue intersection accident rate does not exceed the 1-.0' ` accidents per MEV threshold, and,thus in igation is riot necessary. PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLES, & `AUSES Sidewalks are provided along both sides of SW 110' Avenue and generally along the north side'of. Gaarde Street. With City of Tigard improvements a.bicycle lane will'be provided along Gaarde Street. Transit near the church is provided. by Tri-Met. Route. #12; Barbur; Route #94, Sherwood/Pacific*Highway Express; and Route #95,Tigard/1-5 Express travel between downtown Portland and Sherwood on"weekdays. Route'#12 also operates on weekends. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS . .The traffic study for the proposed expansion and remodel of Tigard First Baptist Church has been,prepared'to determine the potential, impacts'to the Gaarde Street and SW *I IOt,' Avenue intersection and the site driveways: 'T1ie .church expansion is expected to add 23 weekday. AM peak, 22 weekday PM, peak, and 383 Sunday peak. hour trips. TheFirst Baptis "Church is located at.,11015. SW Gaarde Street in Tigard,, Oregon. With church redevelopment two additional site driveways are proposed; the f rst to SW 110 ' ' Avenue and the second to Gaarde. Street: Both proposed driveway locations; as well as the existing driveways to Gaarde Street and SW`110t' Avenue, have sight distances that exceed AASHTO minimum sight distance recommendations:.: ,Left turn lane warrants and the NMCD peak hour signal warrant were reviewed. Based on . low peak hour volumes, neither left turn lanes or traffic signals are warranted or recommended. . The capacity, analysis verifies that the study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service afterthe proposed expansion of Tigard First Baptist Church. Intersection improvement&are not necessary. Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church ..April 14, 2004 Engineering LLC' Traffic Analysis Report • Gaarde Street, Tigard a APPENDIX • Vicinity Map Figure a • Site Plan Figure b • Lane. Configurations and Traffic, Control Figure c • Traffic Flow Diagrams Figure 1 .2004 Existing Traffic (weekday AM & PM and Sunday peak hours) Figure 2 2009 Background Traffic Figure'3 Trip Distribution Figure 4 Trip Assignment'. Figure 5 2009 Total Traffic • Traffic count data • Left Turn Lane Warrant Worksheets • Peak Hour Signal Warrant • Accident History Summary (furnished by the Dregon Department of Transportation) • Traffix Capacity Analysis Worksheets Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard LOT DATE: 3/10/04 FILE: 0414flow.dw JACK cT' _ nHaDHs` 0 ST 10 rr, e F ~Z4T J~ p~ f S 5~ P~ W A L.. - `ST r r PARK U T st x a > ERROL ST S4 C fT Np, J'Pic CC s~ „ N a W ERROL ST F ri MAPD SW HARTE SW - G~ aF' • ~y _ MUCIT J> m CT ( sv N 6 ~Sa - F N~~~ t E. P° c Syq~~'Up c,3 3r~` q 6Gppp i V) w +"2 r--1 N IT SW y ~Il F i s SW FW~TON N I Y BAMBI LN EN u l0. SW WAT ct a. S~ Sp ``~of L KINS A Q J / FS CT . -SW ALBERTA CT y N SW FONNER a _ > ~ Qp VPL O Q/ zo ' J ' Nifk' MoRbEN S c A PL cxAE ` I SW SECA CT E$ 3 N r'u i G- LL ~b r~ C 12 q r° E° h cv g ¢ S~ rr e. r yL L I _ SW MARION - ST 70 ` a PARK :'F` ST ~ y y FAN E I FIELO SW HOLLOW Y4 SW ;z ri G\ c?° S E( 'J c tt a~ cps s< CREEK >LN Su 4~ SITE 96 z :COOK LN ,'~r~1 ao~E D~ ! v, J' . dA Ea 4 W sT a a -j c _ - 5Y GFL IN CT i 2n` ti'~o- FAIRHAVE M SW FAIRHA EN tea' S c s` ° W TALON LN _ 'u ~ ST SW i/s~vn'OIF. I2 't„4sy Jib tO % a fy. m m. FAIRHAV N "W ri A- L1$ QEDQ~Q,- _ _ 3 - LH m q. m ROSE o e~ - ~O JLR ri " GARDEN SW - _ - m r Ss ~N' VISTA ti VIEYNOUNT PARK DL ~ SW HILLVIEW $T g SW FnpyD: OR 5T mar sv } S Cr~ HILLVIEW St+ cREF BjJH SY - i-.R OW r Cal Yt- ® a rn gQ..' CT JOHN A e; ST sV wNT P S AMES i sY m E YNE 1 -A JUNES . H> ~ LN ¢ = 3 - - - - E [p sv c sv g sv $ EUME sT SW ELROSE . y a Q ^ aelN m > 9ID LER DR TREEHILL R .r DRIB G yN1EN CT G _ m CT SW o ST a cli J SW DUCHILLY 21 in R, - .y1-• -.•".i O ¢ i. $ - KOUNTA/N 1-!STARVIEW9 ti SW MCFA LAyDSY 3 0 , F aim ¢ sW\EE tt ~ - VIEW LN. i a0R . w_ dti c~Q _ . m 4 ~n -rJ' - SY VIEW R S gRppYlYx. TIEi/ Q < sv GREED uto `LH 3 E I. sv mRn~a aW 5W WtLD 6raet.."w. A LA SW ' i 2 'RIVE DIENE HUROOC -LN ~gW. INE2 ST -a, SW INEZ ' - INEZ Tti v,Y Sv c R. CT ..V'. a > PINEBROOK B U L M U N T A I N E ~a > o SW < PEHBROOK i MID CT ` a M ° C T t; SY ELEN/R VIF YITDEIIPIEW OR ' [T a SY o ri . O O 3 - m m an sv MUROOCK ST I SYI.flOCK1:1t0UNTAIN QT VtEVCREST " 1 SW CROWN CT .10600 g > 10000 n SW PINEBR S~ i ' a Q cr 2 SW BUGLE CT p SY SW HEIDI CT StHE EV DR SW ~Q ' O h ILYN C7 RE I L '+t TE R A , isy.ASPEN __•_a SW DEL MO NTE sW a SW LESLIE CT SY H Xt; _ O c~ a LsY 0.V1`~' O~ sW I SW LADY PEPPERTREE SW DARMEL CT Sw UMNVIEY ST ogSEDR Sio HOOD I~ DR SW ° SATTLER- CT vESCTUND ST 5a 0.04ALry Aj. WX L9 SV mw V ` W g. POD N KABLE ST t "IkOSIDE~ r, FIELD 6RAV 104sw t N q > pt h _ _ gFyF'' SUAAJERFIE DR itseELLFL~aE 1= S1 -N ;if R 51ST sw ' ` c tin t" DR OLF & C RY qi EEE Y jO PIPPEN IN . - . _ _ l'I t• ~aA. w rp M\p - C`Q l SuW+'s°` a pR g . iit. sv ASKORD T in EIS SE0. R RF IE SDy SW GREENING a:6- ;it - IZ~j(/~Q SN u0 0.\P y o S SY G0.EE1A MME yFQ u - o \ Y~• 4 • '~I'i i-'" ss $W 4Z - ~N~F<p J - G S\I HAMLET SWEET 1 R PxwP n f5s' ~~y me os C s m - Su / ` KING CITY P s ncAPa E NTD~ . ~ sw DR B y a v c~ PVON SW PR CEEO{IARD n o CrV.W 10" Ic?,. S7 T°rP ` sr ML COURSE 3 sacvc Sv tE Y IMe o _ ©2002 Thomas Bros. Mips CMBONNEiAU NOTES: NO SCALE VICINITY MAP FIGURE ENGINEERING LLC N TIGARD'FIRST.BAPTIST CHURCH a PROJECT: 04-14 .LOT DATE: 0412 04 FILE: 04140e.dvig " c.7 7 3 - - cn•. - - - cn a. L SW 110TH AVE 1' $0' . - - - : as !s°!r n - EX•'MINISTRY EX; CHURCH _ -BUILDING :.OFFICE _ NEW PARKING' NEW BUILDING = to cc~ - - hQ:LfVi fj _ B~Jt`OFRt. - CHARBONNEAU NOTES: Site plan provided by Architect LA. SITE PLAN FIGURE • ENGINEERING LL,c TIGARD_ FIRST BAPTIST"CHURCH_ b - PROJECT: 04-14 N NO SCALE ` SW GARDEN TIGARD FIRST PARK D BAPTIST CHURCH ' EXISTING SW GAARDE STREET A> 3 • o 0 o j z a z w LL SW GARDEN TIGARD FIRST PARK PLACE BAPTIST CHURCH PROPOSED SW GAARDE STREET TWLTL=4?' TWLTL~ TWLTL C=4> o ca, v CHARBONNEAU NOTES: TINLTL'= LANE CONFIGURATIONS AND FIGURE o ENGINEERING LLC ' TWO-Way Left Tum Lane. a PROJECT: 04-14 TRAFFIC CONTROL C SW GARDEN. PARK PLACE ow NO SCALE TIGARD FIRST y Q - , BAPTIST•CHURCH No W_ 4 WEEKDAY ~~3 AM 0 1 T PEAK HOUR J L <-231 ~ ~ <-215' SW GAARDE STREEr. ` 4-f 27-A . 477- 418 SW GARDEN PARK PLACE o W ^ 2 TIGARD FIRST y Q BAPTIST CHURCH aco~ ►`o WEEKDAY PM oar 1 T PEAK 7-4 N- HOUR 30 N co OIA IC NN _0 ~.3D o F 526 < 541 SW GAARDE STREEr 0---A 15-A w 392-> 383- J SW GARDEN U- PARK PLACE 2 TIGARD FIRST cn Q BAPTIST CHURCH SUNDAY 12 1 PEAK 2s-> HOUR O' ND7 1-26' OE IC... 21 a E- 209 H<-221 SW GAARDE' STREET 13 10-A a 290- 291--> o: CHARBONNEAtJ NOTES: 2004 EXISTING TRAFFIC FIGURE o ENGINEERING LLc TIGARD Q FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PROJECT: 04-14 1 5W GARDEN f~K PLACE' Z _ A{ : , N a WEEKpAY T4GARp FIRS pBpK ' 6APSIST CHURCIA NO SCA1E 4 HOUR rN0 D4' 0-3 N~ 7-~ ~N j p SW ODEEET X55 4-248 •,29~~?31 449 x 513 a . - Sw ~pRDEN' PARK PLACE • ' y ~ . • .WEEKpAY . , TIGARp FiRS~ . : • PEp,K , gApSIST CHURCH ~-Q HOUR cJr 'ODE STREET sw N~ X32 E- 582 X565 ' 16~ 412 a 421a SW GARDEN o PARK, PLACE W a SUIyp'( PBpK TIGARQ PIR URCII : L. _ HQUR BAPTIST C1-1 l~ N o . 13 27 r. } oa SW GAARpE 'STREET 23 Ncp 26 X238 f:►G .13~225 313x RO ,TRAFFIC d .312 a ' and °209. BAC~CG , A-CIS`r •CHP`CH. o ti gaa(9ro TI~~`Ra FIRST B o NOTES.' 2 4 Exvs~n9 Traf fir, 5olotyr for 5 Y~'.. CKB~FR NG'Crow~n . ' SW GARDEN ` N PARK PLACE NO SCALE TIGARD FIRST Q BAPTIST CHURCH WEEKDAY PEAK s%~+ 15%.4 HOUR LO LO V, Io ' In to k- 5% 5% SW GAARDE STREET F 30%_ 55%-> SW GARDEN PARK PLACE TIGARD FIRST vii a.' BAPTIST CHURCH. j WEEKDAY tn PM PEAK - 5%a 5%-~ HOUR m. o to ~ go 04 LO F 5%' F 5% SW GAARDE STREET ; 0 30%~ ili 30%-> 55%~ w SW GARDEN PARK PLACE . TIGARD FIRST ¢ . BAPTIST CHURCH ' SUNDAY ~ . PEAK 5%~r HOUR 70%- 4 bt No LON 1 55% °na ►e-10%. F'30% L F 55%.. SW GAARDE STREET 59~► C3 25%-> 20%~ WL Q CHARBONNEAU NOTES: TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE ° ENGINEERING L,c o . TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST. CHURCH' , 3 a PROJECT: 04-14.. SW GARDEN AlF PARK. PLACE N o W; NO SCALE TIGARD FIRST y Q BAPTIST CHURCH TRIPS: WEEKDAY N = 13 ' AM OUT =10 1- PEAK TOTAL = 23 2-74 HOUR I[ y F 1 y E-1 SW GAARDE STREET 1 - -A 4 4-* 5-+ SW GARDEN PARK PLACE TIGARD FIRST N BAPTIST CHURCH TRIPS: o WEEKDAY IN = 12 PM OUT = 10 1-a PEAK TOTAL = 22 2 410 HOUR 3 ' O fV t!') , F.s SW GAARDE STREET 0 11-A 4 w 4~ .5-> Q z , J SW GARDEN PARK PLACE ' o W TIGARD FIRST Ln BAPTIST CHURCH TRIPS: SUNDAY IN = 192 PEAK OUT = 191. 10~r HOUR TOTAL, = 383 133 ~I oin nm .-r7 a 5 LO N 1y 1F 57 F 05. SW GAARDE STREET Q 10 ---A 48 'I 0 48 38-.> o CMRBONNEAU NOTES: Based on net TRIP, ASSIGNMENT FIGURE ENGINEERING LLC increase of 32,600 S.F. PROJECT: TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH' 4 _j 04-14 SW GARDEN. PARK PLACE A~ W 1 N $ WEEKDAY • TIGARD FIRST . • ' . AM NO SCALE BAPTIST CHURCH' PEAK Nr ~o HOUR g-y 'LoN SW GAAROE STREET rr7 jz-~ 62 x-23 X249 33~ 5 454a ' 517 a SW GARDEN PARK. PLACE - w N a WEEKDAY TIGARD FIRST.. " PM BAPTIST CHURCH n PEAK a g HOUR' 9 !2oco NM. 38 ' ,SW GAARDE STREW 3 N~ E-583 , ~ X566- 20~ . 3 0 1~ 417 0 425-' ° . SW GARDEN PARK PLACE SUNDAY. TIGARS7 CHURCH' ` PEAK BAP co ~.'1 . HOUR ~<ilz_ --o3 2~ 1'62--fit r . , . . . hp K- 4 SW C AARDE STREET 131 ,E 343 . 04 x.282 59_a FIGUR 351-x` 01 3 0 20p9 6TA1- TRA CN. 5 c 2004 Total TtaK~c ° ~ , BApT1ST Ct-{UR . o NOT ES. dTmffic+Trip ARp` FIRST v.. ' 2009' BackgroU~, , T1G • BONEG Q E ` ERIN LLC Assignment. o INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT SUMMARY REPORT Fie: DEDVJG T= 2.1 % P= 0.34 Peak Hour LOCATION; 07:20=08:20 45 6 Total Entry Volume SW GAARDE ST AT CHURCH ACCESS • 14, 0 31 759 TIGARD, OR <-24S (-j L <-233 4 t_2' Date: 02/24/04 Day: TUE Time: 07:00 - 09:00 T=2.9% T=7% 477 <--231, Report Prepared for.• P= 0.87 P= 0.91 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 0 -71 t D Surveyed By., 481 El T F' 508 '7-1 TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC . 0 0 0 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 T=% Trucks By Approach Portlarid, OR 97229 0 0 m Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 I P = PHF By Approach T= 0.% P= 0 Report Reviewed by. JG , EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD . -T E-1 L) E1 T F ALL 07:00-07:05 .0 27 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 36 07:05-07:10 0. 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 45 07:10-07:15 0 40 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 52 07:15-07:20. 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 43 07:20-07:25 0 45 1 0 0 0 0' . 0 0 0 15 0 61 ~i cl 07:25-07:30 .0 49 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 24 0 73 07:30-07:35 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0~ 65 07:35-07:40 0 40 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 53 07:40-07:45 0 42 0' 1 .0 0 0 0 0 0 28 1• 72 07:45-07:50 0 43 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 11 0 59 07:50-07:55 0 30 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 .22 0 58 07:55-08:00 0 60 0 2 0 10 0 0 0 0 17 0 89 2 08:00-08:05 0 28 0. 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 24 0 8 _ 08:05-08:10 0 31 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 16 0 51 08:10-08:15 0 37 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 57 16 08:15-08:20 0 29 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 23 0 53 08:20-08:25 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 47 08:25-08:30 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 63 08:35-08:40 0 31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 45 08:40-08:45. 0 17 0 0 0 0. 0 0' 0 0 18 0 35 08:50-08:55 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 47 08:55-09:00 .0 30 0 .2 0 0 0 0- 0 0 14 0 46 ' 4 •Z15 TOTALS 0 857 5 16 0 32 0 0 0 0 398 3 1311 PHF 0 0.87 0.5 0,35 0 034 0 4 .0 0 0.92 6.25 0,88 % Trucks 0 2.9 0 0 0 3.1 0 0 0 0 7 0 4.1 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT SUMMARY REPORT File: LIDH.mod T= 2.9 % P= 0.67 Peak Hour LOCATION; 07:00-08:00 . 40 78 SW 110TH AVE AT SW GAARDE ST- Total Entry Volume TIGARD, OR 9 0 31 751 F'224 kJ ~r L4 "66 27 ~s1 Date: ' 02/24/,04 Day: TUE T= 3.5 °i° T= 6.1 °i° Time: 07:00 - 09:00 -418 - j E-?15 Report Prepared for., P= 0,74 P= 0.66 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 0 Surveyed BY' , 445 El T f 449 TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 0 0 0 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 T=% Trucks By Approach Portland, 01 1-97229 0 o Phone: 503-641;.6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 P =PHF By Approach T=0% P=0 Report Reviewed by: JG EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD ALL 07:00-07:05 0 .40 11 1 0 4 0. 0 0 0 11 6 63 .07:05-07:10 0 32 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0. 23 13 74 07:10707:15 .0 65 8 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 19 19 118 07:15-07:20 0 35 2 1. 0. 3 0, 0 0 0 23 4 68 07:20-07:25 0 40 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 14, 4 61 07:25-07:30 0 29 3 0 0 2 0 '0 0 017,' 1 52 07.30-07:35 0 31 3 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 25 0 5. 07:35-07:40 0 19 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 .0 22 1, 48 07:40-07:45 0 49 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 1 72 07:45-07:50 0 29 0 1 0 1 0 -00 0 14 .0 45 07:50-07:55 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 48 I 07:55-08:00 0 15 0, 0 .0' : 1' 0 0 0 0. 19 2 37 08:00-08:05 0 29 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 11 4 49 08:05-08:10 0 39. 0 0 0 2 0° 0 0.. 0 1s 3 59 08:10-08:15 0 27 1 1 0 2.. 0 0 0 0. 11 2 44 08:15-08:20 0 2 1 1 0 3 0' 0 0 0 2 4' 08:20-08:25 0 19 1 1' 0 1 .0. 0 0 0 18 3 43 08:25-08:30 0 32 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 22 0 58 08:35-08:40 0 20 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0•. 23 2 51 08:40-08:45 0 21 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 0' 33 0- 13 1 0 0 1 0 0 .0 0 11 3 29 08:50-08:55 0 18 •0 . 0 0. .-2 0 0 0 0 , 24 2 46. 08:55-09:00 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 .14 1. 31 FAA F 0. <i0~^J TOTALS 0 704 36' 13 0 57 0 0 0 0 416 77 1303 PHF 0 0.75 0.48 0.45 0 ' • 0.65 0 0. 0 0 0.83 0.34. 0.72 % Trucks .0 3.4 S.6 0 0, . 3.5 0 "0 0 0 7.2 0 4.5 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 .0 0 0 Pedestrians 1 3 3 8 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT SUMMARY.REPORT... .File: LTOOIG 7=7% P= 0.72 Peak Hour : LOCATION: 07:30-08:30 " . 26 32 SW 110TH'AVE AT CHURCH ACCESSIGARDEN PARK PL Total Entry Volume TIGARD, OR 1 25 0 133, X53 EJ I ..7 2 Date: 02/24/04 Day: TUE . Time: 07:00 -09:00 ' 0 Report Prepared for., P= 0.45.., . P= 0.61 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 7. _ X13 Surveyed 9 fl 3•. TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC '52 ' 26 3 { 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 T=% Trucks By Approach Portland, OR 97229 45 si . Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 • P = PHF By Approach ' T= 1.9 % P= 0.42 Report Reviewed by.- JG EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD Lj E1 , <-7 t- ALL 07:00-07:65 0 0 0 0. 1 1 '0 3 0 3 • 0. 0. 81 07:05-07:10 0• 0. 0, 0- 2 0... 0 1 1' -:0 0' 0 4 07:10-07:15 ` 0 ' 0 0. 0 1. • 0. 0 ' 6, c 0 2 0' 0 3 07:15-07:20 0' 0 0 0 1 0 ' i .2 2. 2 0 0 8 '07:20-07:25 0, 6 • 0 0 1 0' 0 0 0 = •Y 0. `0 2 07:25-07:30 0 0 0 0 1. 0 0 0. 0 3 0 0- 4 07:30-07:35 0 0 0 0 3" 0 1 2 0 1 0'' 2 9• 07:35-07:40 0 '0 0 •0 0 0 ' 61 1 0 2 0 0 3' .Z '07:40-07:45 0. 0 0 .0, 4 0 3 1 ' 0 2 0 0 10 07:45-07:50. , ' 1 ' o, 0 'o- 3 0 6 2- 0 1. 0 1 14 07:50-07:55 1 0 0 0 1 0 "15 . 0 0 0 0, -..o 17 07:55-08:00 1 0 0 0• 1 0 211. 4. 0 28: 0800-08:05 1 0 2, 1 1 • .0 2 1 2. 1 0 0 11 08:05-08:10 0 0 0 0 2' 0, 3 2 0' 0 0 0 7 Z 08:1Q 08:15 1 0 0 0 1'` p 1 2, 1 0. 1 08:1 -0:2 0 0 4. 0 0. 3 0 2 0 10 08:20-08:25 1 0 0 0• 3 0• 0 3-', 0 2 0' 0 9 1 08:25-08:30 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 01 7 08:35-08:40 0 .'o 0 0' 0 U 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 08:40-08:45 0 .0 0 1` 1 0 1 5 6 1 0 1 11 08:50-08:S5 0. 0 0' 0 1 2 1' 2 0 4 .0' ..0 10 08:55-09:00 0 0.' 6 0 1`:. 0 p 2 1 1.' 0 0 5 PH F TOTALS' 7 0 2 2 38. 3 55 '42 8 31 0+ 5 193 PHF 0.58 0 0.25 0.25 : 0.69 0 0.31 0.59 ' 0:25 :0.65 ` 0-1 0.5 0.56 %Trucks' 0 0: '0 0 7.9 0' "0 2.4 12.5 0 0 0 2.6' Stopped Buses . 0 0'• 0 0 0 0 0 1. 0 0 0 Pedestrians 1 0 1 0 1 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT SUMMARY, REPORT File: DEDWIG T= 0 % P= 0.63 Peak Hour LOCATION: 16055-17:55 1 .S 0 T SWN GAARDE ST AT CHURCH ACCESS 0 0 5 Total 923 Entry Volume TIGARD, OR X526 G_j <-S26 0 ILO Date: • 02/24/04 Day: TUE Time: .16:06 -18:00 T=2.2% T=0.5% 392 E-526 Report Prepared for., P= 0.89 P= 0.83 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING . . 0 I. Surveyed By., 392 11 F' 397 'TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 0 •0 0 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite, 111 T=% Trucks By Approach Portland, OR 97229 0 0 Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 P = PHF By Approach T= 0 % P= o Report Reviewed by. JG. EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD __T <-I Li T ALL 16:00-16:05 0 32 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0. 26 0 60 16:05-16:10 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22. 0 47 16:10-16:15 0 20 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 27 0 48 .16:15-16:20 0 27 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 28, 0 55 16:20-16:25 0 15 0 0 . 0. .0 0 0. 0 0 31 0 46 16:25-16:30 0 30 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 32 0 62 16:30716:35 0 32 1 1 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 29 0 63 ' 16:35-16:40 0 26 1 0 0 0• 0_ 0 10 0 27 01 . .54 16:40-16:45 0 30 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0. 0 33 0 63 16:45-16:50 0 .23 0 1 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 46 0 70 16:50-16:55 0 28 0" 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 43 0 71 16:55-17:00. 0 .30 0 0 0 1 .0 0 0 0. 49 --BS~ 17:00-17:05 0 20 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 60 G D =i 17:05-17:10 0 29 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 33 0 63 17:10-17:15 0 34 0 0 0 1 0•. 0 0 •0 38. 0 73 17:15-17:20 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• 8 + 17:20-17:25 0 40 . 0 0_ 0 0 0- 0 0 0 45 1L_ 8S 17:25-17:30 0 27 0' 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 59 0 87 `4-0 17:35-17:40 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 _'~•7a 17:40-17:45 0 37 0 0' 0 0. 0 0 0 0 50 .0 87 J CJ 17:50-17:SS 0 39 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0.' 35 0 ._74 17:55-18:00 0 30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 46 0 77 'Z44 TOTALS 0 710 2 2 0 9 0 0 0 ~0 916 0 1639 PHF 0 0.89 0- 0 0 0.63 0 0 '0 0 6.83. 0 0.89 % Trucks ' 0 2.3 0 01 0'' 0' 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 1.3 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0. 0 0 0' 0 Pedestrians 0 .0 0' 0 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT SUMMARY REPORT File: LIDI.mod T= 2.2.% P= 0.78 Peak Hour LOCATION: 16:35-17:35 50 45 Total Entry Volume SW 110TH AVE AT SW GAARDE'ST TIGARD, OR 22 0• 28 1019 <-563 (J L "71 15 'L30 Date: 02/24/04 Day: TUE. T= 1.9 % T= 0.5 % Time: 16:00'-18:00 383 - 9 E-541 Report Prepared for.- P= 0.87 P= 0.84 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 9 .G-0 Surveyed By.• 398 > El T 411 TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 0 0 0 1225 NW, Murray Blvd Suite 111 T=% Trucks By Approach Portland, OR.97229 o o Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 = PHF By_Approach P. T-0% Report Reviewed by.• 1G EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND - WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD -1 _ 4 4 L) <1 T F' t- ALL 16:00-16:05 0 29• 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .30 6 67 16:05-16:10 0 21 1.' 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 32 .1 57 16:10-16:15 0 25 1 0 0 1' 0 0 0 0 48 .2 77 16:15-16:20 0 30 1 .2 0 2 0 0 0 0 40 2 77 •16:20-16:25 0 35 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 43 4 91 16:25-16:30 0 2S 0 1 0 5• 0 0 0 0 31 0 62 16:30-16:35 0 31 1 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 35 0 73 _ .16:35-16:40 0 25 2 0 0 1 0 0' 0 0 37 2 67 L 16:40-16:45 0 32 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 4 96 16:45-16:50 0 38 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 47 4 _ 96 16:S046:5S 0 37 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 58 2 100 16:55-17:00 0' 34 0 4 0 4 0 0' 0 0 41 5 88 2 1 :00-17:0 31 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 35 3 ^ 75 17:05-17:10 0 39 .0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 38: 0• 79 17:10-17:15 0' 33 1. 1 6 5 0 0 0 0 50 3 93 2 ~o O 17:15-17:20 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 4 2 •17:20=17:25 0 36 1 0 0 r. 1 0 0 0 0 45 1 84 _ 17:25-17:30 0 24 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 48 3 78 ! 17:35-17:40 0 24 1 0 0. 0 0 •0 0 0 37 3 65r 17:40-17:45 0 26 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 31 0 62 17:50-17:55 0 26 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 40 1 75 17:55-18:00 0 30 2 1 0 2 0. 0. 0 0 33 1 69 IOIg = d,`1G7 TOTALS 0 715 27 31' 0 61 0 0 0 0 970 55 1859 PHF 0 0.88 0.63 0.69 0 0.58 0 0 0 0 0.85 0.68 0.87 % Trucks . .0. 2 0 0 0 3.3 0 .0 0 0 '0.S 0 1.1 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0'• 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 Pedestrians 1 3 0 16 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT. SUMMARY REPORT, , File: LTOPJG T= 3.7.% P= 0.01 Peak Hour LOCATION: ' 16:50-17:50 39 23 SW 110TH AVE AT CHURCH ACCESS/GARDEN PARK PL Total Entry Volume " 0 3s 1 97 " TIGARD, OR 0 2 0 :'Date: 02/24/04 - Day.: TUE. .Time: 16:00 -1:8:00 T=0% T=0%, 0 E---0 Report Prepared for.• P= 0.29 P= 0.4 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 7 . Surveyed By.` 7 TRAFFIC SMITHY,-INC 3 23 17 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 T=% Trucks By Approach Portland, OR 97229 S3 43 r ,Phone: 503-641-6333, Fax: 503-643-8866' c P PHF By Approach T= 0% P=:0.67. y Report Reviewed by. JG EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME'PERIOD, --I T ' f ALL 16:00-16:05. 1 0 .6 0 0 0. 0' 0 1 0 0 6 16:05-16:10 0 0 0 0 . 1' 0 0 2'. 0 0 0 3 16:10-16:15 0' 0• 2 1 2 0 0 1 -2 0 0 0 81, 16:15-16:20 0 .0 0 0 2 .1 0: 2' 1 0 0 0, 6 16:20-16:25 0" , 0 0 0. q-"' 0 0 . , 0 0 • 1 01.1. 0 1 16:25-16:30 0 0 0 0. 1• 1 1 5' 0 0 0 0 8 ' 1630-16:35 1' 0 .0• 0 0 1 0„ 4 ' 1 0 0 0 7 16:35-16:40' 0 0 0 0 1` 0 1 1 0 1, 0 0" 4 16:40-16:45 0 0 0 0 1" 0 .1 2• --o 0 0 -0 4. 16.-TS-16:50 0 0 0 0 1 0: 0. 3 0% 2 0 0 6 16:50-16:55 2 0 0 .0' 4 : : 0, 3 1. 1 L , 0 0 16:55-17:00' 3. 0•:' 0.. 0 4'. 0 0.. 1 ~0 0 0 0 8 G 1 :00-17:0. 1 •0 0 0 4 0. 0, • 2., 0 0 0 0 _ . 17:05-17:10. 1 0 0 0 1,. 0 00 4 0 0 0 - 6 .17:10-17:15 0 0 0 p' 3 0 0... -4 1 O.r. 0 0 B' 2~. 10 17:15-17:20 0 0 01 3 0 0 1.' 1 0 0 17:20-17:25 0 0 0 0', 2 0 0. 3 2" . 0 ' 0 0 7 _ 17:25-17:30 ..0 A 0 0' .5 . 1. 0..' 0 2 1 0 0 9 S 17:35-17:40 ...1 0. 0` 0 0.. 0 0. 0 2 1 6 0 0 3- 17:40-17:45: 0 0 0 0' 6: 0 0 1. 3.• 0 0 0• 10 Z _ . , - 17:50-17:55 , 0 0 0 0. 1, 0 0 2 0. 0 0 0' 3 ' 17:55-18:00" -0 0 0 0 1- 0` 0. 2' 2' 3 0 1 9 PHF TOTALS 9 0 2 1 .49 -4 6 51 23 16 0 ' . 1 162 PHF. 0.29 0" 0 •0 0.79 0.25. .0.25; 0.48 0.71 v 0.4 .0 0 0.9` % Trucks 0 0 -0 .4.1 0.,: 0 0 0 0' 0 0 1:2 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 .0 0. '0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 ` S 4 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT SUMMARY REPORT File: DEDXIG T= 0 % P= 0.46 Peak Hour LOCATION: 10:10-11:10 11, 39 SW GAARDE ST AT CHURCH ACCESS Total Entry volume 2 0 S49 TIGARD, OR 9 <--211 +j X235 13 -L26 Date: 02/29/04. Day: SUN Time:' 09:30 -11:30 T=0.7% T=0.2% 290 E--209 Report Prepared for.* P= 0.79 P= 0.82 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 0 l~ Surveyed By.• 303 El . 299 TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 0 0 0 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 T=% Trucks By Approach Portland, OR 97229 0 0 Phone:503=641-6333 Fax: 503=643-8866 P = PW By Approach T=0% P=0 Report Reviewed by, 1G EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD 71 -T tJ T 'L 'ALL 09:30-09:35 0 19 0• 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 32 09:35-09:40 0 24 1 0 0' .0 0 0 0 0 8 2 35 .09:40-09:45 0 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 3 35 09:45-09:50 0 20 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 21 3 52 09:50-09:55 0 27 6 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 11 4 53 09:55-10:00 0 15 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 14 1 40 10:0 10:05 0. 18 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 18- 0 38 10:05-10:10 0 16 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 .0 15 2 35 10:10-10:15 0 28 0 1 0 3 0 0' 0 0 17 0 49 10:15-10:20 0 21 O 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 19 0 40 10:20-10:25 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .14 2 38 10:25-10:30 0 22' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 37 10:30-16:3 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18, 0 38 10:35-10:40 0 23 0- 0. ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 42-. 10:40-10:45 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 19 5 59 / 10:4-0:0 0 27 2 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 3 - 45 10:50-10:55 0 28 4 0 01 1 0 ..0 0 0 14 5 10.55-11:00 0 21 .3 0 0 .5 0 0 0. 0 17 4 50 11:05-11:10 0 20 0 1 0 01 0 0 0 0 21 .-4 46 11:10-11:15 0 17 .0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 1 44 11:15-11:20 1 11:20-11:25 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 6 "o . '0, 23 0 47 11:25-11:30 0 22 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 .11 45 TOTALS 0 525 28 14 0 20 0 0 0 0 404 44 1035 PHF 0 0.81 0.3 0.5 0 0.38 0 0 '.0 0 0.86 0.5. 0.88. % Trucks 0 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : 0.2 0 O.S. Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 4 0 0 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT SUMMARY REPORT . File: ERKF]G T= 0 % P= 0.41 Peak Hour LOCATION: 10:10-11:10 51 31 SW 110TH AVE AT SW GAARDE ST, Total Entry Volume TIGARD, OR 19 0 32 S94• E-"240. (-j L4 F'242 10 t_21 Date: 02/29/04 Day: SUN T= Time. 09:30 -11:30. 0.5% T=0.4°r6 291 E-221 Report Prepared for.' P= 0.84., P= 0.84 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING . 0 Surveyed By: 301 E1 f 323 .L TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 0' 0 0 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 T=% Trucks By Approach Portland, OR 97229 0 .0 Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 P = PHF By Approach T= o % P= o Report Reviewed by. 1G EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD --J, -T *1 ALL T (i L) 09:30-0935 0 19 0 0 0-. 4 0 0 0 0 13 0 36 09:35-09:40 0 23 1 0 0. 3 0 0 0 0 10 1 38 09:40-09:45 0 18 0 2 0 1 0 0-. 0 0 14 1 36 09:45-09:50 0 24. 0. 3 0. 8 0 0 0 0 21 1 57 09:50-09:55 0 29 1 2 0 3. 0 0. 0 0• 13 2 50 09:55=10:00 0 17. - 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 15 2 39 10:00-10:05 0 19 0 3 0. 4 0 0 0 14 1 41 10:05-10:10 0 18 0 4 0 1 •0 0 0 0 12 4 _ 39 10:10-10:15 0 29 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 18 1 54 10:15-10:20 0 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 10:20-10:25 0 22 0 0 0 2' 0 0 0 0 16 0. 40 10:25-10:30 0 21 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 17 0 43 10:30-10:3 0 20 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 1 39 10:35-10:40 0 24 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 22 0 10:40-10:45 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1 55 10:45-10:50 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 •0 0 18 2 49 S r 10:50-10:55 0 25 .2 0 0 1 0 0. :0 0 18 6 10:55-11:00 0 25 3 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 19 4 61 1-7 11:05-11:10 0 20 0 3 0. 7 0 0 0 0 26 2 SB 11:10-11:15 0. 17 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 23 2 44 11:20-11:25 0 25 0 2 0 2 0 0 0. 0 '19 0 48 11:25-11:30. 0 21 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 21 0 47 PA r 19 4 ~ V. e, 4. 1-73 TOTALS 0 536 14 38 0 68 0 0- 0 0 413 35 1104 PHF 0 0.84 0.42 0.4 0 0.42. 0' 0 0 .0 0.88 0.4 0.86 % Trucks 0 , 0.6 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0.5 0 0.5 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 6 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT SUMMARY REPORT File: LTOQ]G T= 0 % P= 0.83 Peak Hour [OCATION: 09:30-10:30 20 16 SW 110TH AVE AT CHURCH ACCESS/GARDEN PARK PL- Total Entry Volume TIGARD; OR 1 .17 2 90 E-g W E-13 9 '-1 Date: 02/29/04 Day: SUN. Time: 09:30 -,11:30 T=0% T=0% z Report Prepared for,.. 2.1 P= 0.43 P= 0.54 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 29 SUrvayed & '40 . E1 F) 8 TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 7 6 4 1225 NW. Murray Blvd Suite III . T=% Trucks By Approach Portland, OR 97229. 58 IT Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 P = PHF By Approach T=0% P=0.53 Report Reviewed by.;1G EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD `1 ALL 09:30-09:35 0 0 0 0 1 :0 0 0 0 4 0' • 0 5 09:35-09:40 0 0 2 0 1 2 0` 1 1 2 0 0 9 1 09:40-09:45 .3 0 0 0 1 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 4 09:45-09:50 B 0 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0. 0 16 09:50-09:55 5 2 0 0, 2 0 :3 ' 0' 1 0 0 0 13 09:55-10:00 3 0 1 0' 1, 0 0 0 1 0 "0 0 6 10:00-10:5 5 0. 0 0 2 0 2 i 0 2 0 0. '12 10:05-1010 2 0 2 0' 1 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 5 ? 10:10-10:15 .1 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 10:15-10:0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1. 0 1 5 10:20-10:25 1 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 1 0. . 0. 2' L}- 10:25-10:30 0 0 0 0 -3, 0 0 2. 1 1 0 0 7 10:30-10:35 0 .0 0 2 0 0_ 1 0 0 -1- 7 4 10:35-10:40 0 0 0 '1 . 2 0 0 0 0_ 0 0. 0 3 10:40-10:45 0 0 0. 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 10:45-10:50 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 10:50-10:55 2. 0 0 1 1 0. 0 5 3 0 0 0 12 10:55-11:00 6 1 0 0 2 1 .4 2 1 2' 0 0 19- 11:05-11:10 4 0 ' 0, 1: 0 0 0 f 0 2 0 0'• 8 11:10-11:15 1 0 0 0 0 0, 0 1 0, 0 0 0 • 2. 1: 11:20-11:25 . 1" 0 0 0 4 0''.'' 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11:25-11:30 4 0 0 0 0 0. 0• '0 0 0 0 0' 4. _."064-3 -4= ~3s TOTALS 55 3 9 6 32 4 , 16 18 8 18 . 0 ' 4, 173 PHF 0.45 0:25 0.38 0.25 0.71 0.25 '0.35 OS 0.5 0.5 0' 0.25 0.64 % Trucks 0 0 0' 0 '0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0' 0 0 Stopped Buses 0 6 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0" 01 Pedestrians 14 0 0 9 '-Grode, Voeignoli[ed In emclians r ree S•Sloroge Lenglh Required ' . Y -40mDh L -20% 17 7 T y - is 1 - - eo IN, ' eae} t. W' 7 . > _yM 1111 I.-L.. .j R ~ Ir [ ' ~ , , • loo II °ro~~ rvo loo soe .os rw rw ree - we . Y •er•ecm erowe[ arra . .w Figure 5. W6rront for left-turn storage lones on two-tone highways. ew- r ,Ysf Grode, Uneignoliud In4neClioM , L- : Loll Turn[ in V• 'S-Siologo UAglh Required ne 3; Vr•4OmDh L•40ti -LNL Y1 4T ±t±k 7Y I. EL w w .ee no ..r.ww..r.au.. V. storage 9 elones on two-lone hi•h For left-turn Fig~re 7. Warrant waYs. , Storage requirements for critical left-turn movements at unsignalized. intersections on 2-1ane roads. " % Left Speed. Opposing Advancing . Left Turns.in Turns in Storage. Intersection Mott Analysis,Period , Volume 'Volume Advancing Advancing Req'd (ft) „ (mph) Vo.(vph) . VA (vph) Volume (vph) Volume L 5W tlo ` at Guard St S6 l.T ' '69 Total AM Peak Hr ZS . 0 4-S 3 4- 51-1 N0 ' `09 TC)t-Q PM- y- 25 0 5o 31, 55 X 1K No 61 T al • Sund 2e 0 1 7: 1-10 5 E5/,* tiro S d"N13 LT T I M P Ur 25 2.9 9 4- 63 6-7 No 'Cil PM P k fr 2.5 4-Z 5 6' 13. Z Ye No ` t Peak v 25 3i 8 4- = 88i " N o . Source: Highway Research Record #21.1, Harmelink M. D.. ~yDi~t}. T►gaJl F`i15{}}Sr '>w1, ' An~f . s~nwinAlrA1~N Mn~~'.~y:'k62~r . J , December 2000 "Includes 6/14/01 Errata Page 4C-9 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 600 > 500 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 W 0 400 2 OR MORE LANES 81 LANE w 0 a- 300 1 LANE & t LANE ' w 31 200 •150 Z 2 •100 100 X 2 400 500 600 .700 800 g00 1000 1100 1200. 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH). 'Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a. minor street approach with two or more laries and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one' lane. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT DATA Major Street Minor Street High Intersection Analysis Period. Volume Approach Signal Volume Lanes Volume Lanes Warranted? (vph) (vph) SW I 101' Avenue To I rq -la l Z. urs i No v raarde agree M Peak~ r Sw 1101'` W ue zocA Tat Tra iC Ibs$ S I' No SW ba arae e P o r ~W 110th AVZVwI I Trc1 i _fQS Z 14 I . No S)S ` 5unda(I P r 03124/2004 TfRS"A'N'N0N -SYS T E M ACC I D8NT L I ST I N0- PAGE 3- GAARD ST FROM-SW 121ST TO PACIFIC FM & W4DS '(TIGARD)_ 1990-2002 WASHINGTON COUNTY - CITY OF TIGARD SYSTEM/ INTER OR DISTANCE ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE RHS- SERIAL DATE/ C17Y STREET FROM CBAR/ TYPK/TURN WEATN/ AOC- PARTI- VEH LIC/ WU./ DAY- PIRsr/ INTERSECT DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ CIPDTT/ ONNER/ AGE- MOVE/ 'ERROR/ -EvL•'N'T/ INVEST TIME SECOND (F EV -LOC _ (LANES) LI08T CLASS SEVRTY. TYPE SEX PR-TO ACTTON CA[LSE 03337 04/26102 STREET -tAMBER 09010-+ UR-COL STRGHT (UNDIV) RALN I BACK 01 MVOP PRI ORI-Y BACK - IMP BACK NONE FRI 03P Sinn, NUMBER 1901c~{Vl 30 NN 6 (2 ) WT DAY POO PDO PASS 41 M - SE NW NONE • -TH. 77fp - 02 UN04 OS M PSNGR - 03 t4VOP ._PRI OR1-Y E70P NONE PDO PASS 48 F. NW SE STOPPED 09341 11/06/02-STREET NUMBER 0901 r" LOCAL STRGHr (UNDIV) C:LR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT REAR-END NONE WED 03P STREET NONPER 1901O(9W 90 NW 8, (2"-)•_. DRY DAY POO. PDO- PASS 34 F NW SE NONE 40TH-IMP 02 ElV40P` PRA C7R1=Y STOP N17N6 PDO PASS 83 P NW SE 6TOPPED F..077910 2/31/O1•STREET NUMBER 0901 G UR-COL INTER 3-LEG CLR H TURN 03 MVOP PRI ORI-Y SMXT NONE ON 07P _ -STREET NUMBER 51IG 110 ~r1 CN 2 NOME DRY DL.T1 7NJ IN.TB PASS 10 M B W NOt~ 02`7]478 19 M PSNGR .03 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TORN-L T. IN TRP INJS PASS 33 M W -N NONE NO YIELa 9/23/02 STREET NUMBER 09016 UR-COL ALLEY,. O-LEG CZAR B TURN Ol MVOP PRT ORl-N TURN-L NO ROFWY P(OT ON 03P STREET tMXBER 5110 nOTMI 999 N 7 2 - DRY DAY'- POO PDO PASS 41 P S 'W NO-YIELD Ar 02 MVOP PRI OR1-,Y 9TRGHT moNE POO TRCKT 42 M E H. NTAVE (►.ri- S CT'lo):] 12271 10/O8/00 STREET NUMBER 09010 UR-COL INTF2i .3 -TAM CLR E REAR U1.MVOP PRI ORl-Y S7AGHT Rt3AR-END NONE SUN 04P STREET NUMBER 5117 1~2T}~ E 6 NONP DRY DAY POO PDO PUSS 42 M E W NONE _ TOO ?rkR' 02 MVOP PRI ORI-Y amP NONE PDO PASS 15 F B W WAITFORL 13261.' 12/07/00 STREET NR4B8R 0901 C3 UR-COL INTER 3•LEG CLR A TURN 0 1'MVOP PRI ORI-Y TURN-L NO ROFHY NONE THU OBA STREET WR+O HN Ell: 112TH' CH 4 NONF. nfiY SAY PDO PDO PASS- 77 It S W GO A/RED NO-YICLAI 03 14VOP YRS_ OR.I-Y SIRGHT NONE POO PASS 51 M. K E HONE 0565.1 07/02/03 STREET WLWBER 4701 G Uk-C.Cli, INTER 3-MG CLR B REAP..' O1 iNUP VRI OR1-Y STRGHT RBAR••EMD CITY MON 07A S'CRFET RmlBL1t Slt9 1111T14 G o t1n-. DRY DAY• FTIJ POO PASS 39 M S H NONR_ FOL-CiAS 02 WOP PRI ORl-Y STOP IMP SIG INJA PASS 20 F X W WAITFORL OTHER. 08250 10/05102 STREET NUMBER 0901 G UR-COL INTER 3-LEG: CLR E REAR 0 NVOP 8X1 OR1-Y STRGIII' REAR-E'1D NCOJE SAT 03P STREET NUMBER 5114 mvijA E 0 NONE DRY DAY INJ ?tX.i PASS '1O 'F S W WONE F•AL-CLOS ' ex am Thu Apr 8., 2004 15:13:17 Page 2-1 ex am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:17 Page 3-1 - - Tigard First Baptist Church Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 Charbonneau Engineering.LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic,* Weekday AM Peak Hour 2004 Existing"Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour. _----'------------Level Of Service Computation-Report----------------------- -_^------_-__---_-_---Level of Service Computation Report, 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Sass Volume Alternative) 2000 RCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) t*+i+++t+itt*itt#tt+t+it#+#t+t*#tt**#*+*i+ittt*+tttit+ttttttt+#tt*#+t#++++++tA## *t#t+t##t#*t#+++*it*t##t+tt++titt+*t#tt*t*#4+t#t+t+t+##+t#tt+t+#t++*itt++#*t++t+ --Intersection Al Gaarde Street `At 'Site Access intersection 112 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue +t+ttt#ttt+ttttttitttttttt+tttttitt+#tttt+ttt+#t+t++ttt+ttttt+tt+t#+t#ttartt#+++ ttt++tttt+t++ttt+tttttt+t+rt#tttt+ttt+ttt#+ttttttttttt#tt#tt+a+tttt++tttt+t+#t#t Average Delay (sea/veh): 14.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.5 Worst Case Level of Service: C tt+tttt+#+tttttt#ttt+t+tt+,tttttttt++#ttttttgt+++tt+ttt+tttt+rttt++t++#ttt++tttt# t##t#t+++#+t#++ttt++#t#++t++#ttrtit+#tt+t#ttt+ttttttttt++ttttt*+#+*+tt#tt+ttt+t+ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Went Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T R L - T - R L- T- R' L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T R' L- T R L .T - R 1--------------- 11--------------- 11---------- -___=t1-------------- -1 I---------- --___11------------- __f1--------------- 11---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled . Uncontrolled Control: Stop Sign - Stop Sign - Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights, Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 11 '0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0: 0 0 1 0 I---------------- 11-=---_---------11---------------II---------------I' ------------I--_------------ II--------------- Ilr-------------- III Vol- Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 31 0 14 4 477 0 0 231 2 Base Vol: 0 0 0 31 0 9 27 418 0 0 215 51 Growth Adj: 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00'1.00 1.00 "1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 31 , 0 14 4 477 0' 0 231 2 Initial Bse: 0: 0 ' 0 31 0 .9 27 418 0 0 1215 51 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88. 0.88 0.88 0.88 0,.88. PHF Adj: 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0,74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 PHP Volume: 0 . 0 0 35 0 16 5 540 0 0 262- 2 PHP Vol,-: 0 0 0 42 0 . -12 37 568 0 0 292 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 00 0 0" 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol:: 0 0 0 35 0 16 5 540 0 0 262 2 Final Vol.: 0' 0 0 42 .0 12 37 568 0 0 292 69 __-___-___--I------------- --II---------------II-------------- -11------------- I-__________------- -____________-_____----------_1 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx'xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx. Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6,4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo13owUPTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx-xxxx xxxxx 11_=------------ 11--------------- 1 __-____-____I____-__________LI--------------- 11___ capacity Module: Capacity Module: _ Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx _ 812 xxxx 263 264 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx.xxxxx 966 xxxx 327 361 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxj= 351 xxxx 781 1312 xxxx-xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap,: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 284 xxxx 719 1208 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.:. xxxx xxxx Xxxxx 350 xxxx 781 1312 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 277 xxxx 719 1208 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I----------=----II---------------it---------------11---------------I: --------=---I---------------11------- -------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: - Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx x_xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7,7 xxxx xxzzx xxxxx xxxx 7C]CxXx stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx"xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move:. + t t + t t A t t t t t LOS by Move: # + t + t + A + # t t # Movement: LT - LTA - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xzxxx xxxx '423 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx zxxx 322.xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd.StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxicxx 14.7 xxxxx 1.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 16.5 xxxxx 8.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS:. + t t t B + A- + t t t t Shared LOS: # t- t t C t A + + t + t ApproachDel: YXx" 14.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachDel: xxxxxx 18.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx. ApproachLOS: * B + * ApproachLOS: * C * + Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc-Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND ex am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:11 Page 4-1 ex'-pm Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:19 Page 2-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Tigard First Baptist Church' Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04714 .2004 Existing Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour - 2004 Existing Traffic,-Weekday PM Peak Hour --------------------------------------------------------ti Level Of Service Computation Report Level of Service Computation"Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Sass Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volumq.Alternative) ++tt+tttt++i+tttt+t++++tt++++t*++:++++tt+t+tt+ttit+++t++++ttt+rttttt+t~+w+t++w++w+ t+tttttr++t+t++t+ttt++ttt+t+++tt++++t+++t+t+++tt+t++t*t++t++r++t+i.t*ttt+ttttt+tt Intersection,y3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue Intersection.$1 Oaarde'Street at Site Access . ++t++++w++wtt+twt++t++tw+w+t++ttttt~+#ttw+tt+t++++_,►+wwt+**+t++•++wt+w,rt+++++++tt- t++w,rtt++ttw+w++wttt##++wtt++++t++w*t+++++w+tw+t+++*t++t+*ttt+t#+t#~t+t++t++tttw - Average Delay (sea/veh)10.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Average Delay (sec/veh); 18.0 Worst Case Level.Of Service: C ++t++,ttttt+tr++++tt+t+tt++ttt*+ttttttt+t++tttra+++ttt+++++++++t++++ir++tt+++tt+++-~ ;tirttt*~t+t++t+t+ttt++++t~tt++_+t+++++t++t*t++++t++tt+tttt+t~t*++*t++t++++++t++,rt+t . Approach: North, Bound South Bound -East Bound West Bound' 'Approach: North Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound -Movement: L - T R L - T - A. L - T R L - T - R Movement: L T - A L - 'T - A L - -T - A - L - T R ' -----------=1---------------f1___________-_-__II--------- .I ____1.._--_-______-__II____.,__-_--____II------------- -_II--------------=1 Control: Uncontrolled _ Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Controli Stop.Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled, Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include _ Include Include Rights: Include Include Include- Include Lanes:, 0 0 11 0 0' 0 0. 0 1 0 0 0 if 0 -0 0 0 11 0 0 Lane2: 0 0- 0, 0 :0 .1 -0 0' Or 0 0 0 1 '0 0 0 0 1 0 0 :_---_,-_=---1_________________ _____-__-II---------------ii----___________I -_______----I----r----------II______________=I-__-_____---Ii-__- _-______1 . ` Volume Module:. Volume Module: Base Vol: 52' 26_ 3: 0 25 i 1 2 0 7 .13 0 4- Base Vol:. 0 0 0 5 \0. L 0 0 392 0_ 0 526 0- Growth Adj: 1'.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00, 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 1,00 1.00 -Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00-1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 Initial Bse: 52 26 3 0 25 1 2' 0t 7 13 0, 4 Initial -Bae: 0. " 0 - 0 - 5 0 '0 0 : 392 .0 0 526 0 User Adj: 1.00`1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00- 1.00 1:00 1.00 Vser Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1,00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 'PHF Adj: 0.56 0.56 '0.56 0.56 0.56'-0.56 _0.56 0.56 0.56. 0.56 6.56 0.56 PHP Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0:95 0.95 0=9S 0.95 0.95 0.95'0,95 0,95 PHF V41ume: 92 46. 5' - 0 44 2 4 0 12 23 0 7 PHF Volume: 0 0 6 5 0 0 0 414 0 0 556 0 Reduat Vol: O 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 •'0 0 0. 0 0 Reduct Vol : 0. 0 0-. 0 0 0 0 0' '0 .0. 0 0' Final Vol.:, 92' 46' 5 0 -44 2 4 '0 12 - 23' 0 7' Final. Vol.: 0. 0 0- 5 0 0 0- 414 ' 0 0 556 0 11--------------- 1I--------------- 1: _ 1-__-____--____-11--------------- 11-____- -I. Critical Gap Module: 'Critical Gap Module:. Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx:xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2. 7.1 xxxx 6.2 'Critiaal-Gp:xxxxx'xxxx xxxxx 6.4-xxxx xxxxx XXXXX xxxx XXXXX XRxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo13oVUpTim: 2:2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx"xxxx xxxxx 3.S xxxx - 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3:3 VollowUPTim xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx:xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx.xxxxx 1______ ________11_-_---_ __--________-___I______-_---_---II----------- ________________-__-__-_-I Capacity Module: _ Capacity Module: Cnfliat Vol:-- 46 xkkx xxxxx. xxxx'"xxxx xxxxx --202 xxxx 45.-.285 xxxx 49 Cnfliat Vol: xxicx xxxx xxxxx 970.-xxxx xxxxx-'xxxx xxxx-xxxxx. xxxx'xxxx•xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1515 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 614 xxxx 1030 672'xxxx 1026 Potent Cap.:' xxxx xxxx XRxxx 283 xxxxL xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx Xxxxx Move Cap.; 1515 XXXX xxxxx XXxx xxxx.XXXXX 638 xxxx 1030 632 xxxx 1026 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx- 283 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx, xxxx XXxX xxxxx _______________11--------------- I1____-___-__11__-_-_ __I .____-__I_____________ .____11_._________ __I1------ _________i Level Of Service Module:- Level !Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx.xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx+xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 18:0 xxxx xxxxx XXXXX-Xxxx XXXXx xxxxx xxxx XJMXX LOS by Move: A + * t + * t - t + LOS by Move: + + t C + + t t. + t w + Movement: LT - LTR - RT` LT - LTR AT IT - LTA - RT IT - ZTR - RT Movement: IT -.LTR - RT LT - LTR'-•RT IT LTR - RT LT - LTR-- RT Shared Cup.:.xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 906 xxxxx xxxx ..695 xxxxic' Shared Cap.: xxxx.xxxx xxxxx xxxx.xxxx xxxxx -xxxx xxxx xxxxx_kxxx xxxx:xxxxx" Shrd.StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9,0 xxxxx.xxxxx 10..4 xxxxi' Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxs xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx'xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * * * . * * + + t + * * t Shared LOS;' + + t t t t + A * * H Shared LOS;. ApproachDelo, -'xxxxxx Xxxxxx 9.0.' 10:4 ApproaahDel: xxxxxx 18.0 xxxxxx xaxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A H' ApproaahLOS: + C t` w Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001-Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ERG-PORTLAND Traffix 7.5.1115 '(c) 2001 Dowling Assoc: Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND ex pm Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:19 Page 3-1 ex pm Thu Apr 8, 2004_'15:13:19 Page 4-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Tigard First Baptist'Churah Charbonneau-Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour 2004 Existing Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour ° , Level. Of Service g utation Report Level of Service 'Computation- Report 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume *-Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue Intersection #3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at'SW 110th Avenue Average.Delay (sec/veh): 17.4 Worst Case Level Of Service:' C Average Delay (sea/veh):- 9.1 Worst Case Level Of-Service: A }#t#+*{+}}+}}}}**+++}t++}**}}#*}t}}}t}tt}{}}}*+tttt}*}t}{}}}t*}}*}}*t}}}}+}tt}}+ #}**r++*#*}*}tt**}+t*}t*+*#tt}}}}}++#}}}t*}}#}*}}}}}}ttt*}}}}}*}}*}+~}}+t**}}##+ Approach: North Bound. _ South Bound East Bound' West Bound Approach:. North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T' R - L - . T R L T R L - -T - R Movement: .L T - R L - T - A L - T• - R L - .:T- - R ;.--I 1_- II I tControl: Stop Sign Stop Sign >,,Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Controli Uncontrolled - Uncontrolled' ' Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include- Include Include Include -Rights: Include. Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0.-'0 0- 0 0. 0 11 0 0. 0- 1' `0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 0' 0- 11 0 0 0 1 .0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0, 0 0 0 ` -7----------i---=-==--------II-7 ----.------.=-I1---------------11---------------I ------------I---------------fl------- --------ll---------------II---------------I Volume Module: _ Volume Module: = Base Vol 0 0. 0' ' 28 . 0 22 15 383' 0 0 541 .30 ' Base Vol: 3 23 17 .1 38 0 0 0 . 7 8 0 0 Growth Adj:: 1:.00.1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 .1100-1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grogth,Adj: ,3.00..1.00 100. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1:00 " e. Initial Sse 0. 0`. 0 28- 0 22 _ 15 383 0 0 S41 30 Initial Bs_e: 3 - 23 17 1 38 0 0 0 7 -8 0 0 -User Adj: - 1.00 1.00 .1.00 `1.00`1.00-11.00',1.00'1.00 1.00 1.00-1.00 1.00 User Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj:- ..0.9.7 0`.97' 0.97 0.97,0.97 ;0.97 -0.97 0.97 0,97- 0.97.0.97 0.97 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90' 0.90. 0.90 0.90. 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 .0.90 0.90 0.90 - PHF Volume: 0 0 0 29 O'' 23-' 15 395 _ 0 0 '558 31 PHF Voluma:`_ _ 3 . 26 '19 1 42 0 0 0 8 9 0- 0`. Reduct Vol: •0- 0 -0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduat Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0_ 0- 29 - 0'' 23- 15 .395 0' - 0- 558 31 - Final Vol.: _ 3 26' 19' 1 42, 0 0 0 . 8 9 0 0 I--------- ..----II---------------IL----=-____-__--II---------------I -----1--------------- L1------- -____---11 I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical W: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xx' 6.2:'0 4.i.xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: ,4.1 xxxx.xxxxx 4.1`xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 7.1 xxxx xxxxx,_ FollowVpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5.xxxx- •3.3' -2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx.xxxxx 2.21xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx" I-__-_ II --11'--r------------[I----- -I -I------------ -II--------- I1__= _II- -.1 Capacity Module: Capacity Module: xxxx xxxxx Caflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx '1000'xxxx 574 589 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx'xxxxx Cafllat Vol: 42 xxxx xxxxx 45 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 42 90, Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx'xxxxx. 272 xxxx. 522 996 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx,xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1580 xxxx xxxxx '1577 xxxx'xxxxx- xxxx xxxx 1034 899 xxxx xxxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 269 xxxx'. 522 996 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx'xxxxx Move Cap.: 1580 xxxx xxxxx 1577''-xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx ,1034 891 xxxx xxxxx . 1 -----------------------------II---------------1- ___I~__------ ___11=----------- ----1 Level Of-Service Module: :Level Of. Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx.. 8.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx.xxxxx Stopped-Del: •7.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx - 815 9.1-xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: t * } * + - A } } ` } } LOS. by Move: A } * 7► t * - f A. A Movement; IT - LTR - RT. LT'- LTR - RT IT -'LTR - AT IT - LTR - RT. Movement:- LT LTR - RT.. LT - LTR - RT - IT LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT , Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 342'xxxxx xxxx.xxxx xxxxx xxxx.xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 'xxxx.xxxx-xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx , Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 17.4 xxxxx 8.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7:3.xxxx x-%=x xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx-xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS + } + * C * A Shared LOS: A. " ApproacbDel: xxxxxx 17.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx "ApproabhDel: 'xxxxxx. xxxxxx 8.5•. 9.1 AppzoachLOS: C t * AppsoaahLOS: t t A A' Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed'to CHARSONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND Traffix 7:5,.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBOHNEAU ENG-PORTLAND ex sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:21 Page 2-1 ex sun Thu Apr.8, 2004 25:13:21 Page 3-1. Tigard First Baptist Church Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic; Sunday Peak Hour 2004 Existing Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *a####ti##*##i*a*#t###****t********#*tii+*tt#tit*##i#+***#*ir***##*##**t*#*t*tttt #t###*#ti*i+*##**##**t#i#*#ttt*####**#**t*#t#t#*#t**t#**###*i#*#+*#**a*+###++ii# Intersection $1 Gaarde Street. at Site Access Intersection #2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue ' ta#+ta**r#**++#+*#*##tt*ttttt*t#*t***t+#+#tt#tt*t#t**###t**#ra#*#*t#t#**Ai*ai+t# ##**t#**tt#***t#*#*****#tt#*#~*i*i#*tit#**i*#r*#*t#ttit#*t#t**t#t*#t*t*#tt#trtt# Average Delay (sea/veh): 12.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Average Delay (soc/veh): 12.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: B. *#**#*ri*#*#tt#it*+#*t#*#t**####**###a*#k+tt*#*t#*#+**it#*#*#t**tt**#tt*+##*#a#t# t+**+*****#*i*att*#*##tt*+##t*t***#**t*#*t*+##*#*i'~*t*a#+*##*taii*#t#tt#*i#*##i# Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- "T - R L- T- R L- T R, L- T. - R Movement: L- T R L -T- R L- T R_ L - T - . R. --_---------I_______________II_______________II____ _--II--------------- I I---------------I1--_-_.-__------ - I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include. Rights:. Include Include Include Include Lanes:. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0' 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 if 0: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------i---------------______-II--___-_--_---------------I __-__---____I_------- -______II_____________--11--------------- II---------------I - ' Volume'Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 9 '0. 2 13 290 0 0 209 26 Base Vol: 0 0 0 32 . 0 19 10 291 0 0 222 21 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 Growth Adj: `1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse:" 0 0 .0 9 0 2 13 290 0 0 209 26 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 32' 0 19 _ 10 291 0 0 221 21 User A4j:- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00-1.00 1.00 User Adj: '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj. : 0.88 0.88 0.88 0,88 0,88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88"0.88 0.88 PHF Adj: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86-0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.66 PHF Vol--: 0 0 0 SO 0 2 15 330 0 0 238 30 PHP Vol---. 0 0 0 37 0 22 12 339 0 0 258 24 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0• 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 -0 30 0 ' 2. 15 330 0 0 238 30 Final Vol.: 0 01• 0 37 0 22 12' 339 - 0 0 258 24. II I 1 Critical gap Module:', - - Critical Gap Module. Critical gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx -6.4 xxxx - 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx _ Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx" FollowVpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3,5 xxxx 3,3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx :FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxic 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I I----------- I ____________7 - Module Capacity Module: - -s Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 611 xxxx 252 267 xxxx xxxxu xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 632 xxxx 270 282 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxr-= Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 460 xxxx 791 1308 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx• .447 xxxx 774 1292 xxxx xxic= xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxv 456 xxxx 791 1308 xxxx xxxxx "xxxx xxxx xxxxx move C xxxx xxxx xxxx.x---- 449 -xxxx 774 1292 xxxx --xxx. -xxxx xxxxic =----II---=---==------II- ------------1 Level Of Service Module: Level of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx r =-xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxx= xxxx xxxxx 'Stopped Vol:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx'xxxxx 7.8 xzxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: t t t Y~t * A * * t # * LOS by move: t * * * * A * t. t * - * Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR ='RT" LT -,LTR - RT Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT, LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxz xxxx 494 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared.Cap:: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 528 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.5 xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxitz xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxi 12.7 xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * + * B * A # t, * f * Shared LOS: * * t * H * A # t ApproachDel: xxxxxx 12.5 xxxxxx XXK-V= ApproachLOS: i' B i # Approach:. xxxxxx 12.7 x7BggOt xxxxxx ApproaohLosLOS: * H # - t - t _ Traffix 7.5.1115 (a)' 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND Traffix 7.5.1115 '(a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND ex sun Thu Apr B, 2004 15:13:21 Page 4-1 bg am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:22 Page 2-1 : Tigard First Baptist Church.. Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonucau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour 2009 Background Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of-Service Computation Report ' Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) • #+i+*+#}##t#t#t*#*t#t#tt**##ttt+ttit*#ttt#tt+*#tt+#t#t++t+t*it#++*+##+t}#**#*t*t ' - #t*##**##*#t##**#*tt*t####+*#it#+tt**#t*t##tt*ttf#t#tt**##tti*tt*ttt+*#tt+#+i}+} - intersection (13 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue Intersection @1 Gaarde Street at Site Access ' *+i*rttta}a**#aaat***+tt*+}+#tr+tt*t+t+*t+#+*+}t#tttttttttt#+t+t++t+ttt++t+t+tt+ t+i##tt#tt+ti++ttttt#}t+t#t#+t##t#t#+t#+tittitttt*itt##tti**#+tt*+ttt+t+*#*+#ttt Average Delay (sea/veh): 9.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: A Average Delay (sea/veh): 12.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ##+t#*+#*+*}###i#t t***ittt#*tt##**tt*tat#tt#i*#***t*#**#+t##ttt#t++*t*t#*i*#a*## t##**+t*+t#t#*#**#*#+}*t#tittt+*ti#t#it+*#t##+tt*#*#tit**#+#*++#titttit+t*t*#t+t Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound - West Bound Approach: North Bound South Sound East Bound West-Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ^--------__-I--------------- 11---------------II--------------- 11__-_-- -_-I. ___---------I__-_________-__II--------------- 11---------------II----__-_------_I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Stop sign stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled -Rights: 'Include Include .Include Include Rights: Include Include Include- Include Lanes: 0 0' It 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 Lan": 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 11 :0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1• 0 11--------------- 11_____-___-_---_I' • -_--_-_-__._L_____--_____-_-II----____-_____-II-----_____-:---II---------------I Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 7 6 4 2 17 1 9 2 29 12 0 .1 Base Vol: 0. 0 0 31 -0 14 4 513 0 0 248 2 Growth.Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00 _ Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Due: 7 .6 4 2 17 1 9 2 29 12 0 -1 - Initial BBC: 0 0 0 31 0 14 4 513 0 0 248 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.64 0.64 0.64 -0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0,64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 - PHP Adj: 0.88 0,88 0,88 0.86 0.68 0.88 -0.88 0.88 0.88 0.68 0.86 0.88 PHF Volume: 11 9 6 3 26 2 14 3 45 * 19 0 2 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 35 . 0 16 5 581 0. 0 281. 2 Deduct Vol; 0 0. 0- 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0, Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 11 9 6 3' 26 2 14 3 45 19 0 2 Final Vol.: 0- 0 0 35 0. 16 5 581 0 0 281 2 I--------------- 11------- ________il--------------- 11_______________i ____________I_______________II_______________II--------------- 11______-___-_-__I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gip: 4.1 xxxx'xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6,2 7.1 xxxx 6.2 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 'FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 - 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 FollowUp.Tim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx _ 11_- _____-_I I-------- 11____-__- ______II---__-___-___-_11___--_-____-__-I Capacity Module: Capacity_ Module: Cafliat Vol: .28 xxxx xxxxx 16 uxxx xxxxx 68. 71 27 92 xxxx 12 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 672 xxxx 282 283 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1599 xxxx xxxxx. 1615 xxxx xxxxx 929 624 1054 897 xxxx 1074 Potent Cap.:.xxxx xxxx xxxxx 324 xxxx 762 .1291 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1599 xxxx xxxxx '1615 xxxx xxxxx. 921 816 1054 851 xxxx' 1074 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 323 xxxx : 762 1291 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------1--------------- ----______---__II---------------II----__-____Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 494. 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: I-------------L_11 '-------------I1---------------II---------------I Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: LOS.by.Move: A + * A + # * * * . * - Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT LT.- LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT LOS by Move: * * + * * * A * * + * + Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1007 xxxxx xxxx 864 xxxxx Movement: - IT - LTR -.AT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxxx xxxxx 9.3 xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 555 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * + t } A * * A * Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx_12.1 xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ApproachDal: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.6 9.3 Shared LOS: * * * + _8 * A * + + * } ApproachLOS: * * A A ApproachDel: xxxxxx 12.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx Approachlos: * 8 * + Tzaffix 7.5.1115 (c)•2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to,CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND Traf£ix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND bg am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:22 Page 3-1 bg am- Thu Apr 8, 2004 15.13.22 Page 4-1------------------ - -------4 -_---------p------------------- ° Ti and First Ba tist Church Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project-04-14 Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009-Background7Traffie, Weekday AM Peak Houa 2009 Background Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour ----------------------Level Of Service Computation Report ___---_--_-_---_--_---Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ttttttttttttttttttt,ittt##t#t+#t++ttt#t++#t+tt+tttt+#+t#tt#ttttt+ttttt#tttttttttt +t#+#t+ti.+tt#+##+tttttt##++##tt+tt+r+#ttt#t#+t#++tttta+++#tt#rtttttt#+tttt#++t++ Intersection /2 Gaaxde Street at SW 110th Avenue Intersection /3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue ##itt##ttttttt#t#tt+tt*tt*#*#ttt*#t*itttitttittt##t#ttt#tt t#t##~rt#t*##tt#t#itt#t *#t#t#tt#tt#it#t+t*#+t#t+#+###ttt#t+##ttt##t#t#tttttt+#tt#t####t#itttt#ttt###ttt Average Delay (sea/veh): 13.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Average Delay.(see/veh): 10.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: B .+t*i*t#ttt##tt#t#tt++#*titt##t**ittt###t#iii #ttittttttt#t#ti#tt##ttt*+#tttttt*t*t ####+#*t#+t+#*#####tt#*t#ttt#tt+t#ttt*tt##t##it+#t*t*t tt#~t##t*#ttttt+##tt++#t#t Approach: North Bound" South Hound' East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L T - R... L - T - R Movement: L - T_ - R L - T - R L - T R L - T, - R Control: Stop Sign'. Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights:* Include . Include Include • Include - Rights: Include", Include -Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 0 O> It 0 0 Q 0 '0 1- 0 0 0 ll 0 0 0' 0 1! 0 0 ---------`--I---------------II------------=--II------------`--II---------------I ------------i---------------li----------`----II---------------- 11-^-------------I Volume module: Volume Module:. Base Vol: 0 0 0 33 0 10 29 449 .0 0 231 55 Base Vol:' 52 28 3 0 21 1 2 0 7 14 0 4 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 "1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 A 0 33 0 10 29 449. 0 0 231 , 55 Initial Bse: 52 28 3 _ 0 27 1 2 0 7 14 0 4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 -PHP Adj: 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74.0.74 0.74 PHF Adj: 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 •0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0,56 PHP Volume: 0 0 0 45• 0 14 39 610 0 0 314 75 PH8 Vol--: 92• 50 5',•, 0 46 2 4 0 12 25 0 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 r Reduct Vol: - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 45 0 14 39 610 '0 - 0 314 . 75 Final Vol.: 92 -•50 5 0 48 2 4 0 12 25 0 7 1----^-`--------II----------=----II--=--^---------11------------- =-I ------------I---------------11---------------11==---=---------=11---------------1 . Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx'xxxxx xxxx.xxxxx Critical Up: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx•xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1'xxxx 6.2 7.1 xxxx 6.2 FollovViTim:xxxxx xxxx-xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxX xxxxx Fo13owUpTim: .2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 . I________________-_---____--II--------------- -_-I I------- 11---___-___---_-------------- 11_-___-__--_ Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1040.xxxx 351 389 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 50 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxi 289 xxxx.4 49 292 xxxx 52 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx, 257-xxxx 697, ,1181 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx = Potent Cap.: 1570 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 667-xxxx 1026 665 xxxx 1021 . Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 251 xxxx .697- 1181 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1570 xxxx xxxxx xxxx.xxxx-xxxxx 631 xxxx 1026 625 xxxx 1021 Total.Cap: 0 , 0 xxxxx -428 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx I_______________il--------------`II----------- --`-11------ ^--I ---------`--1---------------Ilr------------=-II------^--------II--------`------1 Level of Service Module: Level of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7,3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xicxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx yYxv xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * # * # # * + * LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * _ * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT-- LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT LT -•LTR --RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT - LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 901 xxxxx xxxx 684 xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 470 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sbrd Stppei:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx y xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.1 xxxx xxxxx 10.5 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.7 xxxxx 6:2 xxxx x xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx . Shared LOS: * * * * * A * * B Shared LOS: t' t # + B t A t + t t + AppreachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.1 10.5 ApproachDel: x~ 13.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproacbLOS: * * A B ApproachLOS: *v B * t Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARSONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND Traffix 7'.5.1115.(c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU EKG-PORTLAND % bg PM Thu Apr 8, 2004 15.13:24 Page, 2-1 bg pm ' Thu Apr 8,.2004 15:13:24 Page 3-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project,04-19 - -Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Piojeet 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Weekday PM Peak. Hour 2069 Background' Traffic, Weekday,RM Peak Hour _ Level Of Service Computation Report - Level Of Service Computation Report - 2000 HC3 Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Una ignali zed -Method (Base Volume Alternative) #+trt~'*t**t+#i####*##t}*+r*t*t#tt#++t}tt#+t#*+*##t#t+t#+#t#*t#tt#t##+t#*t++#*t#t* #*+**##+#++*#+tt*###t#tt####t#s#**+ttt+tr++#*#t+*######+##+t#+#ttttt+##t##+#t+t# Intersection #1 Gaarde street at Site Acaess Intersection #2 Giarde Street at SW 110th Avenue *ttt####*#*##t*##tt##*#*+#+*##++#####**+t}*#*#*t*####t*#t*t##*t*t**##t*tF###t#}t*. ##+t}#t*t#*****t*#t*##*t*#++tt##tt##}#t#*#*#t##++##+######+*}+#t+#}t##*#*ttt*#t# Average Delay (sea/veh): 13.0 Worst Case Level Of 'Service: B Average Delay (sea/veh): 13.8 Worst Caae Level Of Service: B _:*tt#t#+ttt*+#}##+#*####*#t++*t#*tt+#+tt+ttt+#r+#*+#+*#+*t*t##t+#tt###t#t+++*#+it - +t##*#rt+~###}###t+##t#tt#+#+t###+#tt#+#*+#*tttt*t#t**#t**t+t+tt+#t#*+#######tt# Approach: North Bound South.Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North.. -Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ' Movement: L - T- R L T R L- -T. ,R L -..T - R Movement: L -T. - R L- T- R. L T' r R' L- T R 1___________ _-__.._-____-___II----------------- 11_____- ----------__I__-__-___-_-___It--------------- Control: Stop Sign -Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Control: Stop"Sign .'Stop Sign Uncontrolled ' Uncontrolled - Rights: = Include Include Include Include.-, Rights: Include Include Include Include - Lanes: 0 0 -0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0. 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0' Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0. 0 1 0 0 OF 0 0 0 1 0 I ! Volume Module: u e . - Volume Mod 1 "Base Vol:, . 0 0 - 0 5 0 - , 0 0 421 0 0 565 - 0 Base Vol : 0 0- 0 - .30. 0, 24 16 ' 4,12 0 0 562 32 Growth A4j: 1.00 1:00. 1:00 00 1.00 1-.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 _1:00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1;00 1.'00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 Initial sap: 0 0 0 '5 0 0 0 421 0 0 565 0 Initial B":- 0, ' '0 0 - -30 0 24 16 412 0- - 0 582 32 User-A45- . 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1'.00 1.00-1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 Usex-Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 T.00 1.00 1.00 •1.00 1'.'00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0:95 0.95 0.95 0.95-0.95 0.95' 0.95 0,95 0.95 •0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF-Adj: 0.97 0,97. 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97. 0;97 0.97. 0.91 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 5- 0 0 0 445 0 - 0 597 0 PHF Vol--: 0 0 0 31 - 0 25 17- 425 0 - 0 601 33 Reduot .Vol: .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 00 Reduat- Vol : -..0 :6 0. 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O__ Final Vol.: _0 0 0 5 0 0-' 0 445 0 0 597- -q Final-Vol;: 0" 0 0, 31 -0 25 17 425 0-' 0 601 33-.- -II1 _-_-_---__-_lr_._-__ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical;Gp:xxxxx xxxx."xxxxx' 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx .Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx, xxxxx 6.4 xxxx -6.2 -4.-1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollcWWTim:xxzxx xxxx xxxxx 3:5 xxix xxxxx•xxxxx xxxx.xxxxx`xxxxx xxxx-xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxic -3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx. - ___-____II------- __-__--_I)_______________1 1 _ 11 Capacity Module: ______°_---I I--'__-°_'°---i capacity Module: Caflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx .1042 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx," xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: ~xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1075 xxxx 617 634 xxxx-xxxxx *X= xxxx,xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx '-251 xxxx xxxxi •xxxx xxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxx.xxxxx- Potent. Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 245 xxzx 493 959 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx ._257 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 242 xxxx 493 -'959 xxxx xxxxi °xxxx.xxxx'xxxxx* Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 456 O xxxxx xxxx'xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx,xxxxx Total Cap: 0 O xxxxx 443 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxk xxxx xxxxx I------------ 11------- )).-__-___________i. 1-------- __-__-_11---------------- ^ - Level Of Service. Module: Level Of Service Module: II ) Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13.0 .xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxX xxxxx xxxx xxxxx. Stopped Del'(xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xXxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: + ± + g # # # # * # * + LOS by Move: * t # • # + # A t + # # # Movement: IT - LTR - RT - LT - LTR - RT -LT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT- Movement: IT r LTR -.RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA r RT LT- LTR -'RT. -Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx'xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 464 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx.xxxxx-xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.8 xxxxx' 8.8 xxx)i xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: # # # * t * # * } # Shared LOS: # } t # ApproicbDel: xxxxxx 13.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachDel: xxxxxx -138 A 8, :xxxxxx' * xxxxxx ApproachLOS: + 8 ± * 'ApproachLOS: B', t # Traffix 7.5.1115 (e)%2001 0owling'Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU EKG-PORTLAND Traffix 7.'S. 1115 (e) 2001 Dowling Assod.'Licensed'to CHARBONNEAU EKG-PORTLAND bg pm Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:24 Page 4-1 bg sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:26 Page 2-1 7---------------------------- Tigard first Baptist Church Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour 2009 Background Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service C utation omp Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *ttx#xaxa*ratt#t##ta*tt##+t+ta##a*#*iaa++ai+#+attar#*r}*ti,i*xt**ax#*x}ia*aittta* a#}*t#t**t**it*t*xx*tit}*t}itia*Starr:t*i}a**t##*tti#*t}*t#+}++#r**xt*ta*i#*t*a# Intersection #3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue Intersection N1 Gaarde Street at Site Access +t*t}#a*}+*#*#}+a#***a#t}*}*t#_#t##*#a#***a**#tata##a *tat*t****#xat#####**tt###t# .*a*#a#t*#*#+*at#+##it*it#*Nax#a#**#att#**#*fia#to#*ati#t*#t}*##tt+*aa+##a*#at#a Average Delay (sea/veh): 9.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A Average Delay (sec/veh): 10.9 Worst Came Leve1.O£ Service: B tact}aitt***ti#+a++a***#*+}+#}t#*x#*t#iiia#i}a##*##tt#i#i*#*t***4*+*t##+tt#++#+* #*xi#*ata***a##t***ta**##**t##*##}}i**f#*t+#}**+at#i#**#t##*#t**t*##t*+}*t}+}#a* Approach:. North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T R L - T- R L- T- R L T - R Movement: L - T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R __________II-_______-____--__________-__-________I ________----i__________,_____ ---II___-___________II----_I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Stop Sign -Stop sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: - Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes:. 0 0 it 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Lanes: . 0'-0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 -0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0. 1 0 -----------I---'-----------II----=----------II---------------II---------------1 ------------I---------------II---=-----------ii---------------11---------------I Volume Module: Volume Module: Rase Vol: 3 25 18 1 .41 0 0 0 7 9 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 .2 13 312 0 0 225 26 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth 'Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 Initial Baer 3 .25 18 1 41 0 , 0 0 7 9' 0 0' Initial Boo: 0 0 . -0 9 0 2 13 312 0 0 225 26 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1,00 1.00 '1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 .0.90 PHP Adj: .0:88 0.88 0,88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.88 0.88 0,86 PHF Volume: 3 -28 20 1 46 0 0 0 8 10 0 0 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 2 15 355 0 0 256 30 .Reduct Vol; 0 0- 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 3 2820 1 46. 0 0 0 6•* 10 0 0 final Vol.: 0 0., 0 10 0 2 15 355 0 0 256 30 _______-_-_-I------------ -_____________11--------------- 41-_______------- I I_-__________-__II_______-_______II--------------- 11__-__- --_I Critical'Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2. 7.1 -xxxx xxxxx Critical Gg:xxxxx.xxxx xxxxx •6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ,FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx-- 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 3,5 xxxx xxxxx -FollowUpTlm:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3. 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ___4.4- II_________-__ i ______--__I- II_____________--II--------------- II_- Capacity Module; Capacity Module: -I Cnflict Vol: , 46 xxxx xxxxx 48 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 46 96 xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx:xxxxx.. 655 xxxx 270 285 xxxx xxx= xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap:c 1575 xxxx xxxxx 1572 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1030 891 uxxx xxxxx - Potent Cap..: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 434 xxxx 773 1289 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx move Cap.: 1575 xxxx xxxxx 1572 xxxx xxxxx xxxx'xxxx 1030 '-882 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 430 xxxx 773 1289 xxxx.xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx __-__-I_______________II--------------- II__________---------- __:__-I Total Cap:. 0 O xxxxx 593 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: I---------------II--------------- 11----------- ' Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx- 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.5 9.1 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Il- Stopped LOS by Move: •A # A A A + + Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxX xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx Xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT LOS by Move: * * t , a * A } # + # Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx. Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT = LTA - RT IT -'LTR - RT .Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx X== xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 619 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * + # A i } x t + * + ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxx..x Shad L xxxxx 7p[x7[ x7tlc7cx xxxxx 10.9 xxxxx 7.8 7OC1n[ xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.5 9.1 Shared d LOS: A ApproachLOS: * - # A' A ApproachDel: xxxxxx 10.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: • g t t Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAV ENG-PORTLAND Traffix 7.S.1115'(a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND bg sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:26 Page-3-1--- bg sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:26 Page 4-1 ° - - Tigard First Baptist Church Tigard First Baptist Church " Charbonneau Engineering LLC; Project 04-14 Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour 2009 Background Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour - - Level Of.-Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) _ 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *##r***+,t#s#*}*#}*+#*****a##*#t***#t}*t#***+*}}#*,r**#*#*#*##*}***#+**#+tr*}***#t **#*++*+#*#*}+*#i*##*r#}#}}#*+*#t**+r*}###*}#*t#+t####}*#i+*###}**i*#***#***##+* Intersection f2 04arde Street at SW 110th Avenue Intersection Q3 Site Access/Garden Park. Place at SW 110th Avenue Average Delay (aec/veh): 11.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Average Delay (see/veh): 9.3 Worst Case I.evel.Of Service: A - ]approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound 'Movement: L - T - R 7 - T - R. L - T - R L T R Movement,: L.- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L"- T - R _---------_I-------------- ------------II------________-II___-_______:__..1 _________-_-11___-______-----11---------------II--------=------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign , Stop Sign Rights: Include - Include Include Include Rights: Include -Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 if 0 0 0 1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0• Lanes: 0 0- 1C O 0 0' 0. it 0 0 D 0 11 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------II---------------11-=-------------I -----------I---------------II------------------------------f Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol:.' 0 0 ;0 34 . 0 20 11 313 0 ..0 236 23 Base Vol: 7 6 4 2 18. 1 9 2. 29 13 0. 1 - Growth A4j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1-00 1.00 •1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 Growth Adj: .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00.1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Sae: 0 0 -0 34 0 20 - 31., 313 0.. 0 '238 23 Initial Boo: 7 ' 6 4 2, 18.., 1 9 2 29 13 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00. 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 11,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 PHP Adj: 0.86 0.86' 0.86. 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.66 PHP Adj: 0.64 0.64. 0.64 •0.640:64 0.64 0.64.0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64-.0.64 PHP Volume: 0 0 0 - 40 0 23 13 365 0 0 . 277 27 PHF Vol,,--: 11 9 6 3 28 2 14 3 45 20 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0' 0 0 0 0. 0 O 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0- 40 0 23 13 365 0 0 277 . 27 Final Vol.: 11 9 6 3 28 2 14 3 45 20-. 0 2 ___-------_1 _________________________._11_____-_-_----- 7-1 -_j Critical Gap. Module:" Critical Gap.Module: Critical 0p:xxxxx xxxx xxx.v -6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx zxx= xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 4.1'xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 xxxx . 6.2 rcllowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:- 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 :4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ____-____..__1___________----------- __---________I I____- _________II_-______-_____-LI__ _____-___-____________I ' Capacity Module: Capacity Modulez Cnflict Vol: xzxx xxxx xxxxx 681 xxxx 291 304 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx.xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 30 xxxx.xxxxic 16 xxxic xxxxx 70 72. -29 93"xxxi' 12 Potent Cap:: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 419 xxxx 753 1268 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1597 xxxx xxxxx 1615 xxxx xxxxx 927 =822 1052 695 xxxx 1074 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 416 xkxx 753 1268 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1597 xxxx xxxxx 1615 xxxx xxxxx 919 815 .1052 848 xxxx 1074 Total Cap:- 0 0 xxxxx 584 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx "xxxx xxxx xxxxx ----=-------I---------------11--------------- 11--------------- IF----=--=_------I ___II_________-___--II---______°°-°'-------1 Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module:. Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.2' :xxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx'xxxxx xxxx-xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx'xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A + # A # # # # # * LOS by Move: * * * * * A + * * * Movement: .LT-- LTR - RT LT-- LTR - RT IT - LTR•- RT LT- LTR - RT - - Movement: LT - LTA - AT. IT - LTR - RT -LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA'- RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx'xxxxx. xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1005 xxxxx xxxx. 661 xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 637 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx,xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxxx xxxxx 9.3 xxxxx Shrd StpDOl:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 11:3 xxxxx 7.9'xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: * * * * * + * -A' * * A Shared LOS: • * * * B * A r * * • * ApproachDel: - xxxxxx xxxxxx 8,8 9:3 ApproachDel: xxxxxx 11.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproaahLOS: * * A A ApproachLOS: * B # } Traffix-7.5.1115 (c) 2001.Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARSONNEAU'ENG-PORTLAND Traffix 7.5.'1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND -3_1--_ to am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:28 Page 2-1 to am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:26 Page Tigard First Baptist Church Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total-Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour 2009 Total Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour ----------------------Level Of Service Computation Report of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsigualized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unaignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) #a*tttt#titt**+*ittt#taaaattai#t#t#+#a*a**t#**t*t#t#t#t###a#i##at#t#*#*###ta+#t* #***#i####t##*##*#*ai*#tt#t*t#a***#*#*at#ataatt#a**atiaaai#tt#*atYt#tt###+itt*tt Intersection #1 Gaarde Street at Site Access Intersection #2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue ti*Y#iitttttt++ittt+tt+tt+tatt#tatta#aataY#a#it#ti*itat*i#*tt#t*t*a##*i#Y+ta+t*a #+tt+ttt#*#tr++*t#attt###a+i*t*+#t*+tt##ataat+arait~t*a#ttti#*Y*+tt*t+*++a#attta Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Average Delay (sea/veh): 13.9 Worst Case Level of Service: B - aY4#t#tit+i+#*t#ta*#tt###Yt*#t#t#ati##t#**#it*t#iat#t*#it*a*Y+#*Y*a#*#i##t**tt*# +#t**tit+*a#*+t#**##t*#t#t#taa*t*#tttt#ti+t#a*#*tY*titaat*i#+tt#*iY*tt*#aa#t#**+ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T- R L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R Movement: L T R L - T- R' L T R L T R ------------I---------------il---------- -----~1---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include -Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0. 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0' 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 1 0 0. 0 0 0 0 1 0 i---------------II----------- ___----____-_____II--------------- 1 --II---------------il---------------II----__--------- Volume Module: - Volume.Module:. Base Vol: 0 0 0 36 0 .16 5 517 0 0 249 3' Base Vol: . 0 0 0 34 0 11 33 454 0 0 232 62 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00-1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 36 ..0 16 5' 517 0 0 249 3 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 34 0 •11 33 454 0 0 232 62. User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88.0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88.0.88 0.88 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 PHF Adj: 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0,74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74. 0.74 PHF Volume: 0 0_ 0 41 0 18 6 586 0 0 '262 3 Pip Volume: 0 0 0 46 0 15 -45 617 0 0 315 84 Reduat Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 41 0 18 6. 586 . 0 0 262 3 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 . 46 0 15 45 617 0 0 315 84 1 1------------ ____________1f-------- 11------ 11-------- Gap Module: Critical Gap Module:. Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4`xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp:xicxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1. xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx'xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx, F61lcwUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx '.3.3 "2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx. - 11--------------- II------ .I II___-_-____-__--II--------_--_-_-11--_--____--____ 1 Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 681 xxxx 284 285 xxxx xxxxx-xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1064 xxxx .357 399 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx. 320 xxxx 760 1288 xxxx:xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 249 xxxx 691 .1170 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxi 319 xxxx 760 1288"xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 242 xxxx 691. 1170 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx- Total Cap:.- 0 0 xxxxx 490 O xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 0• 0 xxxxx 419 • 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ___I--------------- 1__--_-___--_-__I II-----------=---I Level Of Service Module:' Level Of :Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx '7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: t a + * * j~ a t * t + LOS by Move: i # t t * + A # t t t + Movement: IT-- LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT -.LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT Movement: IT -'LTR-- RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR -.RT LT - LTR.- RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx- xxxx -550 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 463 xxxxx" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel•:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx-.xxxxx-12.3 xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.9 xxxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS:, B t A t t t * a Shared LOS: a t t * B# A a a t t # ApproachDel: xxxxxx 12.3 „xxxxx xxxxxx ApproachDel: xxxxxx 13.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * B Y • ApproaahLOS: a' B + Traffix 1.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHAABONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND - to am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:28 Page 4-1 to pm Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:29 Page 2-1 - Tigard First Baptist Church Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour 2009 Total Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour -----------------------Level of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM-Unsignalized Method (Base Vol- Alternative) t##ttt*}**#t#**##it#t*tt**}#t**t**t##tt##i#t#*##t***#t*#}#t*ttt#+#*tt**+##*#**#} ##**####*t#ttt*#***t#+##*t#*###*#*#***#t*#######t##**#*+##*t####**#t*#tttt#***#* Intersection #3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue Intersection #1 Gaarde Street at Site Access t#t**+#t#t+**#+t#+####tt##*###t#*t##}tt#***###}#t*##t#**tt*##*t#*t*##*#*#t##*t*} #*}*#t#t*#*t**t#t*t*###+****##t#****t#t*##*#*#***#t**tt#*#t*+t#*###**#*#+##+#*t+ Average Delay (sea/veh): 10.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Average Delay (sea/veh): 13.0 Worst Case Level Of.Service: B +#++tt#+it++t*tt#+t#ttt***ttt*##**++}t++**t*+#*;r#***tt*#tt+*t+tt+t*+t#*tt*t#t#t} t**#*t#tttt#t*t#*#*#t*#+t***.#*t+#*t**+t*t}*+#****#ttt*}t#}tt+*###+*tat*t+t*}*#*+ Approach: North. Bound South Bound = - East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound. West Bound Movement: L T - R L - T - R L - T - R L• r T R Movement: L T - R L - T - R L T - R L - T - R I---------------II---------------II---------------11:-_------------I ------------I-=------------- 11-------- II---------------- It -----I. Control Uncontrolled Uncontrolled stop sign step Sign Control: Stop Sign stop sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights:' Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 11. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0- 0 0 11 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I--------------- II--------------- it II I I II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Volume-Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 63 28 3 0 27 2 3 0 9 14 0 4 Base Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 2 1 425 0 0 566 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 _ Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bee: . 63 28 .3 0 21 2 3 0 9 14 0 4 Initial Bee: . 0 0 0 10 0 2 1 425 0 0 566 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PEP Adj: 0.56 0.56 0.56. 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 .0.95 PHF Volume: 112 50 5 0 48 -4 5 0 16 -25 0 7 PHF Vol-: 0 0 0 11 0 2 1 449 0 0 598 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 112 50 5 0 48 4 5 0 16 25 0 7 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 ill 0 2 1 449 0 0 598 1 ------------I---------------ll---------------II-----------=_--II---------------I I--=------------II----_-__-----_-II--------------- 11-------- =------t Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp 4.1 xxxx.xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx • 6.2 1.S.xxxx 6.2 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx3Lx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 3.5-xxxx 3.3 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2'xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx --------I---------------II---------------tl---------------I1----------- --1 -------I-- ------11--------r----- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 51 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 329 xxxx 50 333 xxxx 52 Caflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1050 xxxx 599, 599 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1568 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 628"xxxx 1024. 624_xxxx 1021 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx x"xx 254 xxxx 505 988 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx move Cap.: 1568 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx- 588 xxxx 1024 579 xxxx 1021 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 254 xxxx 505 988 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- I Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 454 ' 0 xxxxx' xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx" Level Of Service Module: 1--- --------11--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Stopped Del: 7.3'xxxx xxxxx xxxxs xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxw xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Level of Service Module: LOS by Move: A + + . * + * • * * * * Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Movement:. LT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT LOS by Move:. * + • + * * A * * + + + Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 864 xxxxx xxxx 640 xxxxx Movement: LT - LTR - RT IT - LTit - RT IT - LTR - RT ' IT - LTR - RT. Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.3 xxxxx xxxxx 10.9 xxxxx Shexed Cap.: xxxx xxxic xxxxx xxxx 462 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * + * * + * * A * B * Sbrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.0 xxxxx 8.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.3 10.9 Shared LOS: * ' * + * B * A * * * * . ApproachMS: + * A B ApproacbDel: xxxxxx 13.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * B * + - Traffix 1.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONN•EAU EKG-PORTLAND Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU EKG-PORTLAND to pm Thu Apr 8, 2064 15:13:29 Page 3-1 to pm Thu Apr 8,.2004 15`13 29_ Page-4 1--- - Tigard First Baptist Church Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour 2009 Total Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour ----------------------Level Of-Service Computation Report-__---^--_---_ Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalited Method.(Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) " i*####t##**i#+t#ti**#t*tt#t*t*i*t*********tit**#*ittttt***t*tt*#}*#**}#i}#*+}}}} *+*i*4###}**tt#*tt}#tit*}*titii#t~}}+}t*##i}*##***1r#t##t***ittttt#t**##tt*#***it Intersection ¢2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue intersection $3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue i*##*##}#*t#i}t}*##**#*t#**t#*t**t*#i#*ti*ttt#*tt*#*}}}******ti#**#t*}#####t##** ,*#i}##*t*i+*t#*t#t**#*#*#****t**}}*i###*t#***t*tt###*#***tt##t*tt+t##t*t#**#*}*4 Average Delay (sec/veh), 14.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Average Delay (sea/veh): 9.1 Worst Case-Level Of Service: A *ti**#+*t*t**i+•+#***+i#t}**iit**t*#*t*ttt#}*+*}*tt#+**#***t**t4t*#*#ttt#f#t#**t ##**tttit+*#it#t*#*t}t*t**#it##*t##}}t*}*#*#ti**t##***t*+#ttt#**i#*#}#+*iii}++}*. Approach: - North Bound- South Bound -East Bound West Bound ' Approach: North Bound South. Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T R 'L ' T- R' L- T- R L- `T - R Movement: L- T' - R L- T- R L T R L T R - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Control: St Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 "1--0 0 0 0 0 Q 1 0 Lanes:' 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 if 0 0 1' 0 0 0 0 -^-^--------1---------------II---------------11---------------II--------------- volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 - 0 31 0 25 20 417 0 0 583 38 Base Vol: 13 25 18 1 14 0 - .1 0 9 9 0 -0 Growth Adj:: 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 'Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0' 31 0 25 20' 417 0 0 -583 38 Initial-Eno: 13 -25 18 1 14 0 1 0 9 9 0 0 User Adj:: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00-1.00 1.00 Usor'A15 : 1.00 1;00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.-1.,00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97. 0.97-0.97 '0.97, 0.97 0.97 0:97. 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHS Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90.0.90 0.90 .0.900.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0190 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 32 -0' 26 21 430 0 0 602 39 PHF Volume: 14 28' 20 1 16 0 1 0 10 10 0 0 Reduat Vol: 0' 0 0 0 0 0. 0' . 0 0• 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0, 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: '0 0 0. 32 0 26 21. 430 0 0 ; 602- 39 Final Vol.: 14 28. 20 - 1 16 " 0 1 0 SO .10 0 0 ____----II--__-___-___-__I II----_-_____---_II--__-___---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical gaplModule: Critical Op:xxxxx xxxX xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6,2 4.1 zxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx' Cxitical.0p: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 7.1 xxxic xxxxx FollowUPTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.S xx= 3.3_ 2.2-xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FellowUpTim: .2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx •*=Yx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx I II Capacity Module: Capacity Module: caflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1093 xxxx 621 641 xxxx xxxxx -xxxx xxxx XXXXX Caflict Vol: .'16.xxxx xxXXx 48 xxxx xxxxx 85 xxxx 16 90 xinix xxxxx - Potent Cap.: xXxx xxxx xxxxx 239 xxxx -491 953 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1615 xxxx xxxxx 1572 xxxx xxxxx 907 xxxx 1070 900 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: zxxx xxxx xxxxx 235 xxxx. 491 953 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move cap.: 1615 xxxx xxxxx 1572 xxxx'xxxxx 900 xxxx -.1070 865 xxxx.xxxxx Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 437 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1--------------- II^--------------II---------------II---------------I . Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7.2 xxxx xxxxx - 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.1-xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by'Move: A * * A * * # # * A t + LOS by Move: * * # * * A- # * * * * Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT' LT - LTR - RT. Movement: IT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR ^ RT LT - LTR - AT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx' xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1050 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 459 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx- 8,5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 14.0 xxxxx 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A' * * * A. * * * * - + + * t t Shared LOS: B A ~AFproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.5 9.1 ApproachDel: xxxxxx 14.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * } A ApproachLOS: * B t t' Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND Traffix 7.5.1315 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND to sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:31 Page 2-1 to sun. Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:31 - ---_-_-Page_3-1 Tigard First Baptist Church - Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering.LLC, Project 04-14 Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour 2009 Total Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour ---Level Of Service Computation-Report ----------------------Level Of Service` Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) '2000 HCM Unaignalized. Method (Base Volume Alternative) tttttttttttttt+t+ttttt,itttt+t+ttt++ttttttttttttttttttttttttttrtttttt+ttttttttttt ttttttttttttt++t+tt*tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt+tttttttttt+tt+ttttrttttt+ Intersection S1 Gaarde Street at Site Access Intersection #2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue ++ttttttttttttttt+ttttttttttttt+tttt+ttt+ttttttttttttttttt+tttattatttttttt tttttt tttt++tttttttttttttattttt+tttt+ttttttttttttttttt+tttttttatttt trtt t+tt++tt+ttttt+t Average Delay *(sea/veb): 12.6 Worst Case Level 0£ Service: B Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.9 Worst Case Level.Of Service: C tttt+~ttttt++tt+ttttttttttta+tttttt•tt+ttttttttttttttttttttt*t+tttttt+tttttttttt _ ttt+ttttt+ttttttttttttttttttt+#trtrt+tt+tttattt+t++tttttttttttttttt+rrttttattttt Approach: North Bound' South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T - R' L T - R,* L T R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _______-----1______.___.____11.--_____-_.-_--__-__--___-11-__--__---^-_-_1 Control-: Stop Sign. Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign - Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include ' Rights: Include include' Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0- 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0= _ Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1' 0 0. 0 0 0 0 1 0 ) II 11--------------- II---------------I Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol:- 0 0 0 47 Q, 12 23 360 0 0 282 131• Base Vol: 0 0 0 110 0 77 59 351 0 0 343- 42 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,1.00.1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 47 0 •12 23 360 0 0 282 131 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 110 .0 77 59 351 . 0 0 343 42: User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0..88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 -0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 PHF Adj: 0.86 0.66 0.86 0.86 0.86 0,.66' 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.66 0.06 0.86 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 53 0 _ 14 26 409 0 0 320 149 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 .128 0 90 69_ 409. 0 • :0 400 49 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final -Vol.: 0 0 0' 53 0 14 -26 409 0 0= 320. 149 Final Vol.:'• 0 ' 0 0 128 0 90 69 409 0 0 400 49 - __.:------_-1 I1,1- II--, 11-^--I - . -11III - Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx"xx$xx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1'xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fol_lowUpTim:.xxxxx xxxx xxxxx_ 8.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxim YYYYV xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11-----_____ 11 - 1t 1 ^ ------------I -II----------- ---II---------------II- -------------I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cuflict Vol:'xxxx xxxx xxxxx 856 xxxx 395 469 xxxx xxxxx xxxs'xxxx xxxxic Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 971 xxxx 424 449 xmm xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 331 xxxx 659 1103 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cop.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 283 xxxx 634 1122'xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx . Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxY 325 xxxx 659 1103 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.:.. xxxx xxxx xxxxx 269 xxxx 634 1122 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 514 .0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 0• 0 xxxxx 460 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xx xx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: t + t t t t A t t t t t LOS by Move:- t t t t t t A t t t t t Movement: IT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - AT ' IT - LTA - RT Movement: IT - LTR - RT' IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR : FLT IT - LTR - RT " Shared cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 536 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 518 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx -xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.6 xxxxx 8.3 xxxx xxuaix xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Sbrd StpDal:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 16.9 xxxxx 8'.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx . Shared LOS: t t t t B a A t t t t t Shared LOS: t t t t C t A t t t t + ApproacbDel: xxxxxx 12.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachDel: xxxxxx 16.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: ! B t t ApproachLOS: + C t t Traffix 1.5.1115 _(c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND 'Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND to sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:31 Page 4-1 - Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonaeau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour. . _ Level Of.Service Computation Report 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method"(Base Volume Alternative) +ttttttt+tttt++t+ttt+ttt++ttt+++tttttttt+t++t+t+++tttttttt+att+r+t++++++tttt+tt+ - Intersection $3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW-110th Avenue -.+t++ttt++tt+++t++t++tttt++tt+++ttt+t+tttt+ttt+tt+tt+++f+ttt+t+ttt++++t+t+tt+tt+t - Average Delay-(sea/veh): 14.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: B .:+++++t+t+t+++t+t++tt++t++ttttt++t++t+tt+ttttt+t++++t+++tr+++tttt*t++t+t+t+*t+++~ ' Approach: North Bound -South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: . L. - T - R- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _ _-----------1---------------II----=--=-- ----II--_~_----------II---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include 'Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 .0 0-11 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 _--_--__---i----------- r---II--------------- 11---------- 11--77----------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 6 4 2 18 - it 19 2 162 13 0 1 Growth A4j: 1.00 1.00 1.00_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Sae: 14 6 - 4 2' 18 11 19 2 162 13. 0 1 User. Adj., 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 - - PHF Adj: 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64. 0.64. PHF Volume: 115 9 6 3 28 17 30 - .3 252 20 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 115 9 6 3 28 17 30 - 3 252 20 0 2 1--------------- 11--------------- II- II- _--_--_-1. Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4:1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 xxxx 6.2-' -8ollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 45 xxxx xxxxx 16 xxxx xxxxx 286 288 37, 413 xxxx 12 Potent Cap.: 1576 xxxx xxxxx 1615 xxxx xxxxx 670 625 1042 553 xxxx 1074 Move Cap.: 1576 xxxx xxxxx` 1615 xxxx xxxxx 628 575 1042 392 xxxx 1074 I----------- ----11------------- 7-II---------------- II--------------- I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx-xxxxx xxxx xxxxx.• LOS by Move: A t + A t + + + t + + t Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx "xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 967 xxxxx xxxx 411 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx'xxxxx xxxxx 10.3 xxxxx xxxxx 14.3 xxxxx Shared LOS': + t + + - + + t B t + B + . ApproaahDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.3 14.3. ApproachLOS: B B Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling-Assoc. Licensed to-CHM06NNZAU ENG-PORTLAND - 'e & Lea: - _ . , s A'RBORI . ' - _ ST- REPORT: Address of the Report:. Tiga rd •'Fi.rst :Baptist • 0.75. SW.: Garrde: St. Tigard; Oft :Pate of the Report:::::: - ne 22 .2004 Ju Report-Submitted To: Architect: LA PH: 503 231=1122 Larcy Abell;,:; TX: 503-23.1-0317 805. SE Sherman St.'.: ;:.:Portl.arid; O.R 97214 :.I.rev,iewed the trees on the site-on June.22,.2004::::The..l0 trees that are to be affected :by site. development: a.sshown on. the site plan are all non-viable .trees .lqe , to structural defects, dead, djtng oi- diseased. "The remaining arees on site, 33;6 re , :.:located "Eo .the:west;of;.tfie area to be developed and will 8 I be:retatned.:.:.Altliou f~ g.. some of`these may be non-viable they wall 'be retained:` Therefore iQO%' of''.alie: via6le"trees on:site"wtCl`b'e retatned::and, protected , Obv.io.usly the landscaping:.plan will';t e' addin9 9 a si- it iflcant number.of trees. Some of the existing trees under 6'' D BrHy could-. be use,. -the new'landscape..if desired:._. "Tree protection _fen:cing :will teed :to`b.e installed beyond the drip line of• the-trees to be retained: See enclosed tree protection plan. It appears all of the retauied._.trees are.tn the environmental ,zone; so`.the_,.ne 'd for protection fencing shoule minimal depending on, cit=y recommend-ttons. . Please call if I'can'be furtier assistance. Respectfully, _ Raymond Myer;;:General Manager::...:'. Tree Care & Lan=dscapes lJnlimited;.Icic d Certified Arborist by the. Iriternatio'nal. Society of ArboricUl.turie :Lic.- FN-01:60. Oregon Landscape. Contractors' tic.,#.11604 Oregon Dept. of Agricu,ItOre,:Commercial Pesticide Applicators License #00187 Residential and Commercial Spraying • Fertilizing' 'Pruning • Landscape Installation • Landscape Maintenance' Consultation; MEMBER: National 'Arborist Association • "International Society of Arboriculture • Oregon Association of Nurserymen Oregon Golf Course Superintendents`Association • Oregon Landscape Contractors Association State Licensed Tree Service 462635.• Landscape Contractor 95659.• Chemical Application #000.2.31 • Insured P.O Box 1566'• Lake Oswego, OR, 97035 503. 635-3165 *'Vancouver 360-737-2646 • FAX 503-635-1549 Visit our website at www.treecareia,ndscapes.com Tree Protection ;Plan • (REVISED 3[27/03) ' Follow the below listed instructions in order to provide the proper protection,before,.during and .after construction... I. Before Construction: a. Identify and number the trees..to.be protected, verify by. mapping -and/or tagging and note their size in-D B.K, (Diameter at-Breast Height), variety; health and 'structural conditions,. review plans b. Check with local government`agencies.for tree protection ordinances. C.. Remove any.low linhbs that maybe in tiie way of construction equipment, and prune as needed to adhere NAA staridaids...., d..' Leave a protective: (overing;on .the soil;.:i:'e.,, existing groundcover.or mulch. e'. Notify all:other-contractors,that these _trees: are to be saved. and protected:. ; f: Install a temporary. 6'.high metal no-climb fence, to:protect the trees and their root systems:.. Install. tree :Protection :s:ign:.6h - once.. = Posts aocated l0' o;n center;as a eneral rule For-every inch ei. diameters of;tHe trunk (D B H.) allow up.:to 1 foot of B. H.: = 24':radius :of radius from the; trunk as tfie:.,protected;area, : (Example.: 24''. D. protected root system) :Ideally, we .need to..protect more than the drip zone:. The drip :zone:into..the trunk.:°is::thesu'ppor.t roots thafi hold the.are.e pp. TFi:e roots: from.: that drip zone out provide nutrition; .water.and oxygen::;Tryto avoid loss of. more; than . 0% of. root on aii.y or e side.': Tiiis.allows:so.me.ericroach:ment within tfie drip line :-This should be determined on a case:by ease site conditions reviewed: . g:. Identify any insect or disease, problems`that may_requ.ire treatment. . h., .En.gineerarid design.proposed: structures and. construction :to'avoid.ro.ot loss:.Bridge type foundationscan save major roots i. Design landscape islands and planting"areas large enough to accommodate trees at maturity. j. . Plant th:e right tree in the right place..-Avoid.future conflicts with buildings and utilities. k ::Have.an:experienced Arborist review_landscape.plan to assure the right tree is planted in.the right place and-:proposchanges.don't kill.retained mature.trees. 1. Consider.tree removals adjacent to:trees to be saved for wind related stability concern's. Residential and Commercial.Spraying • Fertilizing • Pruning • Landscape Installation • Landscape Maintenance • Consultation MEMBER: National Arborist Association International Society of Arboriculture • Oregon Association of Nurserymen Oregon Golf Course Superintendents' Association • Oregon Landscape Contractors Association State Licensed Tree Service #62635 • Landscape Contractor 45659 • Chemical Application #000231 Insured R O, Box 1566 • Lake Oswego, OR, 97035 • 503-635-3165 • .Vancouver 360-737-2646 • Salem 503-316-8144 FAX 503-6:35-1549 • Visit our website at www.treecarelandscepes.com m.. Check for past and proposed grade and drainage changes; consider'th`e effects: n..,Check-trees for stabil•ity..:: o..`.Rerhbve all trees that would not survive the effects of change.. Remove all hazardous trees. p: .Minimize:.environmental changes::: . IY.. Ddriiid Coh! tructioh:- . ion , a:..Kee eui` meat off'of.the root-system .to avoid, compact P . Q .P.. . b:..Keep equipment away from structure to prevent damage to trunk and limbs. C. :Don't:allow chemicals to be.dum ed on the round near the tree,,.i.e., gasoline, diesel, paint; herbicide, cleaned; thirtners, etc: . d.. -Provide means -of.-temporary irrigation if the project runs .throUdh:.the summer. eIf. roots. or lirnbs%arecut .or_.damaged; have th6' M inspected by an 35A:.Certified Arborst and ~epaired.orareated according to his/her recommendations:. , f: Protect:the trees.from:excessive`tieaE =ie."equipm.ent;`pa.vi'ng'and%or burning.. Avoid.treneting.through'tFielrootsystems; bo7ing`u:nder.. rn`-or-Hand-digging can, _ averoots:. . h Cvritact.tfie.'ISA:Gertified Arbor ist:fa;m.i.l.iar:with :ttie.;site prior.to. and.`durirg any - activiaywithin tlie'drip zone:6'r~.tree protection fencing for=consultation: er. .Const"uction: III: Aft' a... Careful{y landscape the:airea: u:nde: the: tree,,beirag:edreful of the'roots and structure. use plantings that••will live under the:.same conditions as that of.ahe'tree_. 'b: Provide insect and disease control, fertilization and pruning a's needed or*adhere to long, term. protection. plan ,if provide& c. `._Avo.id, direct irrigation spraying onto the trunk:. The amount qf. irrigation needed to keep new piantings. alive can•often: be enough to kil1j,matu,re trees: ; d ; Do:`.not,.cover:.existin.g root systems with. ni6r6 than'2' of.soil.:.;The more soil you add, the: greater the chances of darnagi:ng the root:system;, e. Provide irrigation and/or drainage to emulate pre-constriiction eoriditionS . NOTE: It would be impossible to provide all of the above protection measures,, however the more roots that can be saved and the least amount of surrounding environmental changes that we can prevent; the greater the chances .of saving existing trees:,-Often it_is best to replant with the right tree in the rightVace. so it can grown in the new environment. -t . .,nr -'S • TREE.:S.URVEY. . mped Architect-LA .PM: - - 503 231..11'22'. . Attri:..Larry Abell' FX: 503.231._0'317 805•SESherman.5t Portland, OR §72i4_ RE': 'Tigard First Baptist 11075:S.V1/ Garrde'Sf 'Ti" 'a d OR, cgirimoq Name Botanical Name DBH Addrtional Gnmmeats Viable/ Non=Viable I. i VIlestern Red Cedar:: Thu"a- 'Iicata 20 To ed for over lines rote hazard : Non=Viable j 2 fLawthoro Cratae us • 10. Rot'.deca : -`Non-Viable I .3 Bi Leaf Ma le Aber macro h Ilum 1,2 S s co=dominaht `hazard . Non-Viable 4 Coast. P'' ' '`Pinus_s Ivestris' 'Pitch' Moth ;`diseased Non-Viable 5; Coast°Pine Pinus':s Ivestris,. 14_ Pitchy Moth diseased Non-Viable :..Coast~Pine Rihus;s Ivestris::. 1: Pitch:Moth -diseased Non-Viable -7 Co4st:Pine Pinus s fvestris.: , 10' Dead: Non-Viable 8; Coast-Pine Pinus s Ivestris' Pitch 1v16Eh diseased Non-Viable " Coast-Pine . Pinus:s Ivestris. Pitch-Moth'' diseased Non-Viable 0 . Scotch;Pine Pinus s Ivestris - - 16 ,Co.-dorpinant leader, I `aiard.. Non-Viable: . 11 Scotcfi:'P,in'e" Pinusa `Ivestris 6 , 77. Frakinu.' `:12 '.Ash - 6 s: - - -13 -Red;'Afder ;1~Inus ore `ona 4 14'. Red Alder' AInu5 ore ona 15 Red~Alder Alnus:oreona' - 2 18" :_16. , Dou las`Fir- Pseudotsu a._.menzae:s ,20 :17:: ;Dou `Ias Fir Pseudotsu: a .menziesii., 30 18'. Dou las.Fir:: Pseudotsu 'a:menziesn: ':1830... 19:: Dou. las'Fir.:...: = Pseudotsii` "a:menziesn 10.` '20. Dou' Ias Fir' -Pseudo,tsu b: rrieriiidsii 48_ 2.1 Dou Ias.;Fr ' . Pseudots ' ga °meniresi~, 20 ;22 Do~l'las'191 Pseudotsu. a rrieniiesu 40._:` 23 Fir Pseudotsu a ;rrlenilesii:: =s .18: ' 24 Dou Ias.=Fir.: Fseudotsu' a:metizresir 2't- Dou' las' Fir Pseudotsu a risen iesu S6- 26 Dou-1as Fir' •'Pseudotsu a::menziesii 24... 27` Dou las::Fir Pseudotsu a :meriiiesii _ 24'. 28.!, Dou Ias Fir Pseudotsu. a.:nienzi.esii... ' 29 Dou las Fir ';Pseudotsu a;menziesii,.: 14.:': 30 = :Dou Ias-Fir tPseudots.u a menziesii . 12•: 31:. Dou"las`Ffr. ' . pseudotsu a rrienzresn:. 48 3.2: Dou la"s:Ftr Pseudotsu. a m.enziesu 3 L 3 Do- las'Fir Ps'euc otsu a:menziesn 14 7 77 N01 E Non V able• is dead, dying, diseased :or hazard trees Trees are in-the Environinental Zone. to be retained Residential and Commercial-Spraying -'Fertilizing Pruning'- Landscape Installation • Landscape' Maintenance • Consu!taUon MEMBER: National Arborist Association • International Society:of Arboriculture • Oregon.Association.of Nurserymen Oregon Golf Course Superintendents Association • Oregon Landscape C6ntractors'Asso6aii6n. . State: Licensed Tree Service 462635 Landscape.Contractor #5659.+, Chemical Application #00023.1- • Insured P.O. Box 1566 Lake Oswego, OR', 97035 503-q35-3165 Vancouver•360-737: 2646 •'FAX 503-635-1549. Visit our website at'.www.treecarelandscapes,com t1D over` "Me 11 1 1 {Nr..~f :,r 17 <~1,aY,.).Y yn?r :,:gci:. Housing Wattage Catalog PWA41Y Mounting Code P: • r^ , • , ,~st+i ^~a~ ' d ~i1t~t.;Qi; tYji' ~Y' y" rJ r L .:_f~ Size (sq.) Lamp Number P~ (Insert Code at ' in Catalog M) rPr WAC Series-Type IV Optics 1=1-1/2' Close Pole Mount 8 ;:j%, t. ° c£ t y . r.-r ?-z r ~.y; 16' 1SOW PSMH WAC_615-M $254 2 = 6' Extended Mount $ n 1 :`k..w. :J.. .`y;w..• {:ey,f.•.,h2 /3 22' l 320WPSMH WAC'6932-M 313 W=Wall Mount $20 ~ 16' 100W MH WAC'410-0 241. t. (Backlight Shield is standard on 16' 175W MH WAC'417-M 229 AC Series Wall Mount) 22' 175W MH WAC_491-M 293 Yi 22' 250W MH WAC-492-M 295 NOTE: When using multiple 22' sq. 22' ( 400W MH WAC'494-M 306 housings at 90' configuration, a special r?. • ~;e ; r : - 12' arm is required; see page 150. 16' 100WHPS WAC'510-M 225 f`r ,K 16' 15OW HPS . WAC_515-M 229 _ 22' 250W HPS WAC'592 M 309 22' 40OWHPS WAC-594-M 317 -Type II Optics WPR Series 1=1-12' Close Pole Mount 8 16' 150W PSMH WPR'615-M $254 2 = 6' Extended Mount , $13 WAC/WPR Series 22• 32OW PSMH WPR'6932-M 313 W = Wall Mount $20 1-1/2" Close Pole Mount ' 16 10OW MH WPR-410-D 241 16' 175W MH WPR_417-M 229 22' 175WMH WPR_491-M 293 22' 25OW MH WPR-492-M 295 22' 40OW MH WPR-494-M 306 16' 100W HPS WPR`510-M 225 NOTE: When using multiple 22' sq. 16' 150W HPS WPR'515 M 228 housings at 90' configuration, a special - 22' 250W HPS WPR'S92-M 12 arm is required; see page 150. 30P 22' 400W HPS WPR'594-M 317 WAC Series WPR Series Other lamp wattages available-consult factory V Area Cutoff ParkingMoadway. 11 Reduced envelope lamp. ED28 for 32OW PSMH and 40OW MH. The Area Cutoff has a compact forward- The Parking/Roadway Light has a Type Options: (Factory-installed) Change Add After A CA49, Z throw reflector with a main beam of III asymmetric distribution pattern. Description Suffix To suffix '44&7 ' 60'+ from vertical (30' from horizontal). Ideally suited for roadway applications, 277V Reactor Ballast (vsfiwwr) 27 .6a as(sln providing wide lateral distribution and parking areas or for building mounted 480V ballast (=wP5wi, imp w+s,oo-4wwl,Ps.ry.) 5 r~ r improved uniformities. A Backlight security fighting. ouad-volt ballast (IOOW MH only) M 5 Shield accessory (standard on Tri-volt ballast (32OW PSMH. T rra addtr WAC Series Wall Mount) permits 100-40OW MH 8 100-40OW HPS only) (Canada only) r adjustable house-'side cutoff. Single Fuse (277V Reactor.12OV, 277V or 347V) 27, 1.2 or 6 F 13 ~ 1 rao° 1 120° Iso 190 1so Dual Fuse (208V• 240V o) 48M 3.4 or 5 F 22 1\ ,F J Quartz Standby (delay-relay type) Cmdudes 10GW,0 Wnp) (rVa 277V Reactor) D 49 p 1 Button Photocell (n/a on 480V) 27, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 6 P 15 External Photocell (480V only) 5 P 24 Q 90' Accent Stripe-rate at end or catalog number prefix: G=Gtey, R=Red (WPR1594)j-M) Ke as(dcs Accessories: (field-installed) Ply y4yrtay . 7031 16" housing Puce 22" housing Pricc 16000 Wire Guard FWG-16 $17 FWG-22 $35 Backlight Shield SBL-16 $5 SBL-22 $S1 24900 28122 (standard'on WAC Series Wail Mount) Introduction & Optical Systems Page 130 Candlepower distribution. curve of Candlepower distribution curve of 40OW Mountings......................................... Page 116 40OW MH 22' WAC Series Wedge Light. PSMH 22' WPR Series Wedge Light. Catalog Number Logic/Voltage Suffix Key Page 131 (Preliminary) . ~1ar 60' 60' .0' 20' o' 2a 40' so' eo' ,ao• Accessories Page 133 42.7 ,00 eo' 60 .o' 20' 0' 20' W 60' e0 100 366 120' 1 ' : ,20' fi Poles.......... Pages 154-157 36.6 ,00' 2.5 100' i 30.5 24.4 80' ' 24.4 6v ..f..r 1e.3 60'_. 10.3 W ....sz.2 b' i. 22 2W 6.1 20' 1 01 m 0• 0m 20' ' 6.1 gyp' 12.2 . ' eo' E...... E' 12.2 fi0 : i. ea 60 18.3 W' N.1 J0.5 24.4 ,63 122 61 Om 61 122 18] 24A 30 3L5 24A 163 122 61 Om 61 122 163 NA 315 5 Isofootcandte plot of 40OW MH Isofootcandle plot of one 40OW HPS WAC Series Wedge-Type IV at 25' WPR Series Wedge--Type III at 30' (7.6 m) mounting height, 0' tilt above (9.t m) mounting height, and 0' tilt horizontal, with backlight shield above horizontal. removed. (Preliminary) 16'0 (406 mm) f1 22'0 (559 mm) 16'0 9.5 (241 rnm ' - 22'0 13.4'(340 mm). Exclusive DeltaGuard" finish at no extra'cost!' ® (800) 236-7000; FAX: (800) 236-7500 160 5si160 smmi Order on-line www.ruud1ighting.con1 CSC '%U W 3 + ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C*1 `~gllllrl~ mss,',>~•Y'~` Ri; 70 { CV- y y1 p >T R ~ , o e e ~ 4 1 ~ ✓ O Ax O U P P N 70 N. 7,gmll 00 (,n c ~ gC ~~8 ~ ~ ~ • J/1111\~~ ~ • `~~J , v~ fl 1 44 ' ~ ~ a ~ sa•~ w ;s'r~ p i S r 'rt" to to ~ Y~~ m /11111\~~~ a ~ ~ o un s. ;3 mply~N 1 -70 e u ~ c a p a a ~ ? f4~ ~ Y 2 a 1 Z~A f tt:•}; p~ o ` t6' N ' • • rl F L / { z-n Y P > .fi; • ~ 50~ 0 +tP ~ n tV 4 C ✓ 00 aT U, ® Ln z o z n ] t s~ J' ' -a ►~'RGi3 Sn ' Z aU111 i4: • . d x 74 ~ 2 Xrzy. d0 t ~A =S rt . _7D q - - ri TO S ~AP1I ARD FTRST SlREE~~r ~I~ 11075 SW , GAADREGON j. IGARD, File Number CleanWaterr Services Our commitment is clear. Clean Water: Services Service Provider Letter Jurisdiction Tigard bate 2/16/05 Map & Tax Lot 2S103DC01100 Owner Tigard 1S Baptist Church Site Address 11075 SW Gaarde St Contact . Larry Abell Tigard, OR 97223 Address 805 SE Sherman St Portland,' OR 97214 Proposed Activity Addition to existing church+ Phone 503-231-1122X20.,,. parking This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R&O 04-9). YES NO 7 ' YES NO Natural Resources Alternatives Analysis j Assessment (NRA) i ( ❑ ;Required ❑ Submitted ( (Section 3.02.6) District Site Visit I Date: 8/12/04 ® j ❑ i Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis ❑ f7l 1 i Concur with NRA/or ® ❑ Tier 2 Alternatives Analysis a N/I sV\Ij ubmitted information i Sensitive Area Present Tier 3 Alternatives Analysis ❑ On-Site wetland/stream ® { ❑ Sensitive Area Present' ` Vegetated Corridor Off-Site wetland/stream ` . ® ❑ . i Averaging ® ❑ I Vegetated Corridor Vegetated Corridor Present On-Site ❑ ❑ Mitigation Required Width of Vegetated 50 Ft +'35' from ( On-Site Mitigation 84,8 SF ® ❑ . Corridor (feet). break in slope i _ i Off-Site Mitigation Condition of Vegetated Corridor Degraded i ❑ f Planting Plan Attached ❑ ! Enhancement Required V\Ij Encroachment into I i Enhancement/restoration Vegetated Corridor ® ❑ completion date TBD (Section 3.02.4) - Type and Square Footage I Geotechnical Report of Encroachment 845 SF parking i required ❑ Allowed Use ❑ ❑ Conditions Attached - ! LP (Section 3. - This.Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate.the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if,they are subsequently discovered on your property. Page 1 of 4 File Number In order to comply.with Clean Water, Services (the District). water quality. protection requiremerits the project 'must comply with the following conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes,,dumping of materials of any kind,,or other- activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section .3.02.3. No impacts proposed under this Service Provider Letter, 2.. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained•areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the vegetated corridor which'may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.4. 3. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the vegetated corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the vegetated corridor shall'remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by Section 3.02.5 and per,approved plans. 4. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the. project from the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide the District with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. 5. An approved Oregon Department.of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade,or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of-Oregon. 6. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's)'for Erosion Control; in accordance with the CWS Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 7. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the District or its designee is required pursuant to.Ordinance 27, Section 4:B. `8. The District or City/County may require an easement over the vegetated corridor conveying storm, surface water management, and/or sanitary sewer rights to the District or City that would prevent the owner of.the vegetated corridor from activities and uses, inconsistent. with the purpose -of the corridor and any easements therein." 9. Activities located within 'the 100-year floodplain shall'comply with Section 3.13 of R&O 04-9. 10. Removal of native,. woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable. 11. The only encroachments allowed under this Service Provider Letter are the parking spaces in the southwestern portion of the property. The path shown on the attached figure, is NOT an approved encroachment. 12. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by the District, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and. if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. Page 2 of 4 File Number SPECIAL CONDITIONS 13. The vegetated corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be a minimum of 50 feet wide, as measured horizontally from the, delineated boundary of the sensitive area. 14. For vegetated corridors 50 feet wide or greater, the first 50 feet closest to the sensitive area shall be equal to or better than a'.good" corridor,condition as defined in Section 3.02.7, Table 3.2. 15. Those portions of the vegetated corridor with greater than 25% slopes shall extend 35 feet from the break in slope. 16. For vegetated corridors that extend 35 feet from the.break in slope, the.width of vegetated corridor may be reduced to 15 feet wide if a stamped geotechnical report confirms that slope stability can be maintained with the reduced setback from the break in slope. 17. Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of enhancement/restoration activities. Enhancement/restoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements (R&0.04-9: Appendix D). 18. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation. within the vegetated corridor shall be removed. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native trees and shrub species. 19.' Enhancement/restoration of the vegetated corridor shall be provided in accordance with the attached planting plan and R&O 04-9, Appendix D. 20. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide the Districtwith the required vegetated corridor enhancement/restoration plan in compliance with R&O.04-9. 21. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with Section 2".11.2 of R&O 04-9. If at any time during the,warranty period the landscaping falls below the.80% survival level,, the Owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the two year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. 22. Performance assurances for the vegetated corridor shall comply with Section 2.06.2; Table 2-1 and Section 2.10, Table 2-2. 23. For any developments, which create multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership, the District shall require that the vegetated corridor and the sensitive area be,-contained in a separate tract. The tract plat shall include language protecting the vegetated corridor and sensitive areas.' 24.' The water quality swale and detention pond shall be planted with District approved native species, and designed to blend into the natural surroundings. CONDITIONS TO BE INCLUDED ON CONSTRUCTION PLANS 25.. Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. Plans shall include in the details a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution, condition and size of plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation methods for plant materials. Plantings shall be tagged for dormant season identification. Tags to remain on plant material after planting for monitoring purposes. Page 3 of 4 File Number 26. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final plans including methods, responsible party contact information, and dates (minimum two times per year, by June 1 and September 30). 27. Final construction plans shall clearly depict the location and dimensions of the sensitive ' area and the vegetated corridor (indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition). Sensitive area boundaries shall be marked in the field. 28. Protection, of the vegetated corridors and associated sensitive' areas. shall be provided,by the installation of Qermanent fencing and signage between the development and the outer limits of the vegetated corridors. Fencing details to be included on final construction plans. This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan Is attached. Please call (503) 681-5157 with any questions. Astrid Dragoy Environmental Plan Review Attachments (1) - Page 4 of 4 N - _ I,~ NOTE: BOUNDARY LINES ARE FOR GRAPHICAL PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED ytt~ a R is TO REPRESENT PROPERTY LINES - y a R 59939'46 .09' 4 9939'48' E 26116' \ a r FFFg NOR X EAS[1O41 230 s Id ell or 240 S.W. QABDEN PK PL S8939'46'E 7127 I / l l I ~,YL• I I ; M _ III III 41 FI / 4, CATCHBASIN l\Y/ y1~I II / Rl 1245 s a m ° r b .130 u / yc" 0 S2 D S 1 \ f I{ q\ ~ / ~ / / v = C axAt ;i6.If:i S 8939'46' 81.04'1 / / u 3 D JJ 11 I hhh{ P/ 3: z m 0'y /i / ti~ l/y~li 11 1 1 I p I P I / l E 11f1h, W `~11\\111 ~ ► II 1` - - u I NJ's I I(II I I I 0. 1 \o\\\\\III II1 11 I I l ~I I• • • I ~I II .I % I ~J3 I S.W. GARDEN PK PL CIR III 49 1! 1 IE A. 10• WIDE % _ - - - 111 \\\J\\1\ 1 1 l I I WALLSTONE _ II I V\ `C(A STEPS {Ij I I 13 • 33.00. ~~III\III IIII ~I~'I ~ I I I I 4 / I I n W KEY STO STONE I ,LyO °~AAF'55'SB' W ~IIIIIiIIIIIIIII III ~I~ I I I I I 10• WOE - IIIIIIIII IIII II I J5 4 1 I I d l/ / 57.17 I W L u ~ SHOP IIIIIIIIIIIIIII j~~`~E l l ^I111 IIII r I CONCRE N EDAJ I IcA ; IIII III II I I 1 ~I I I I / O STTWCPPSS TEp 3'000"°' : IIIIIIIIIIIIII I i I I I I / / Ili Ii111 II I a ,o . SDE E I >r) I p o STEPS III I a i I I C'D z° "~wa $ I IIIIII Ii~1 y/ III I /IIII II I I I I I I I ALL ~ I I ~ I I I I n~ MAIN ODORS TO FO I \u Q ~IIIII II / /~~,~p I / 11 I~IIIIIIIII~$' STEP III > . E IIIIIIIII I~//~I~ I I III I ISI 11 I~ II I g .oRS., I I / N~BL . » y I Il l III d CENTER I I 1 a ,o. WI SUIUDBFO I ~I II III / I I v IIII / IIII TO I I l~ %IIII rl ((~i /,e I m / III WALLSN J I I ~j/l/ll II1~A`~%^ r I I \ - FF 254.93- 1111 I I° ; l/1~111////l~/ I GRAVEL NDE CHURCH OFFICE I I I . PAKKINU WALL 478 \ R~2018'IY I u / / PIN I w o l~],.3°S 1P C p' P P y 1 - f V N P V N r m -71.30. / - _ _ - - 20 of NI a• w tL Sa936•oo•W 10483' T&M S 8936'00' w 31119'- - - - - - - 0 )L 3 ~ ~ COMMUNITY BOUNDARY r hi O [x a1RB AND'S/M-V Pf ~~q ~p d l_ S.W. GAARDE 8TREET AAp $ 3 asi p T-Im ;t 9P 14 3 -q 71 s x g o r3 m z ~1 -lug 91 co 8m R, q i 11 ° 0 4 !R c AA q ° m (L~ n i j y m Z, c ~ R 3~ ~ Al ~l S IA ~~Qj a pg j y i a c, Q 2 r5 p a A ° > 3 P't ' 11 t S RC 11§ i' g85 pRill O ~ ~ ' b ~4 d A - 9A IR 11 1 Ali 119 51' ' 11 14 i IN] A 1-07-01 R N ' TIGARD BAPTIST.;; CHURCH I GRADING AND EROSION C ESINW 01 CONTROL PLAN 15573 SW BANGYROAD, S7E 300 ARCHITECT LA LAKE OSWEGO. OREGM 97035 805 SE SHERMAN STREET - 503.96R.6655 www.ccenw.com PORTLAND, OREGON I345-OIA948ASC.OMC 503-231-1122 I MAR-19-2009 FRI 10:53 All FAX NO. P. 02 503,524 6160 P. 81 MAR-19-2604 10:26 AM 'OHALLORAN Tiprd First Beptist.Church Neighborhood Meeting 03neN bumduation of project by. Scott Munger, Tigard First aaptist Task Sorce director. Presentations of artist renderings UY architect Larry Abell. ExpLrfation:of Phase L Phan ' U and Phase M. ~ m= How tkr from the creek will thiparldag lot be? -Lori Hughes' Answer: We will h" a 5000 ; kOr, tort o, as required by the city-. Are you planning to cut arty' trees down by the c vW. a$hes 0t`r Answer: Actually, we are working with an arbmist an1101pat' ncreasing the member of . freer What "of additional ping wM you do as a screen by the grassy slope? We currently view the Smst now we. will We asphalt. -Rick Kenn Will you plant a hedge by the 110* Streit side to Weld the parking lot from the view of the neighborhood? -40wrge Hughes Could you use the hest eatratsw (ck»est to Gsarde Street) prlmadly, instead of the wtond entrance off of t le Street? . We am concArned about the visibility txstering 110a Street and speed some motorists trawl. -0torge.Hughee , to shleld.lJ We haw hi~xd a tr'Tc Answer: We will land~cre and build 77n, m1sultant to stem Ilse Mee issues I hope you consider large plantings to `shield the view of the second Meares on' 11D°i Street. -bA Hughes, Amwer: 77m access poimt would be open, but we must defer to the trgf9c e)tginaer. ~ . . I What is the completion date of arch Phase? -Bruce Anderson Answer: Phast 1 world hopgfultVbegin swwfi re 1n the next year; Phase 11 ire aright passlbly Up" in Cogunction with Phase l; Phase III could emmimbty We emywhm ' . •>irom S to 7 years. ~ . . h p, 03 p.02 F spa SZa gimme 11 10 , 54 RM . + s2,6 AM , . ~KAt..i.0i?AN i out - .It 100wok r eta p,ject it► loak4 e a good 11 0 Yo'i w usidl t s 1t ~g tt~e tt~ a4 Yd 90 f is c~omP~a:od. - Ato Y°A' Ie R at Cab 1 . eGt we W~ oae !1" • rto *P' ut 11th` Stzod- aid You tad bVc Oat ° . . 09009. Wha~e oaf h8 la tox4O ra9ulrv"E°r TW WI ` t -Lail, at all OW t eci dam was aye !oo#n8. , . d a~ talti to ~ et" a tree 04 ; ram's and "0 ' tramo is bash' sve> ~ ~ ~Yhava ~ . Yom' _ Ms talaPJ'd1 Jaw" eat wr! V~ho the -Lca! ~tuig I wiJ! E An l~ Cam' " him • Out WO aro w the ~a' K wow t Air,-ht~ maw yob tro frame sued- wiUb1p k 1An B " }tom Ile flat plow Two A' A 11 . 02/15/2005 11:24 50362561.79. PRIDE,DISPOSAL COMPM PAGE 02/05 dMpk. 40 * :P*R*1 -E ' . DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (503) 625-,6179 Febirua y 15, 2005 Mr: Bill Oyen Architect - LA 805 SS Sherman. St Portland, OR"97124 Re: Tigard First Baptist Church Enclosure " We.bave reviewed the plan &r.the above-mentioned trash enclosure; the site plan does not make it cleat if 0'et a is a post in the center of the enclosure where the gate-would meet in the center. As long as there is no post there, we will be We to provide service to the enclosure given blie'site plans we were provided with. If you have any. questions or•, concermsy please feel free to, give me a call. Tbank you. ' ' Sincerely, Kristin JLeichner s. 02/15/2005 11:24 5036256179 PRIDE DISPOSAL COMPM PAGE 04/05 FEB^13-05 TUE 1 :39 ntl ARCHITECT-LA 503 2b1 0517 r•02 q, 114, h.2 jb~ 44 4- i: d; N '3 l 'p1 , l a i i • . I Bib ~ Y ~ u i `4 r - yy _```++_`y`y`~ ~ ! . 9-1 "y - II 014, %JAJ1r-4- s2 y . ~ • ~ ~ OAA110! Of11[ET . R r ~ 's I TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 3 I I WS SW OAARDE STREET ;p3PIN , I't W G I I TIQARD, OREGON P~ PAGE 05/05 P.01 cowm PRIDE DISPOSAL - p 2 k't r& 0 11:24 5036256179 t.A 02!15/2005 rU6 1®q 40 pM ARCN1TECT FEB_15:'a5 , AV E cs'N! 110TH _ f , ;f MASOMRY,. R"SR E 4GLOS RmE n ; l AfN 'X Urm 20l i. OPEN NG, GATES ROLE AL.10N Wrr pRf1lir . ' , j 22, 72~ PNASS a PAR'S TIGaR~ FIR T PTIST OREGON [~►"1 ARCHITCT•LA S GAARDE 1J075 BOS sE s~R gi2+•~ 2.16.QS . ~a~iai-ii72 - Bend Office Box 7918 sa}em'Office NB , P.O. OR 97708 Bend, 33 x 0-9155 Main office 4060 Hudson A Phone (541) ' al 14 Salem, oR 9773 1252 FAX (541) 63, 589 P.O• Bo 0 97281 Phone (503) 1309 G etie Tigard, Oreg FAX (503)589 1309 Phons (503)' 684'346Q. . , "1~ t~ FAX (503) 7" 147 Testing, Inc. n of carlson Kcal consulting d Related Tests coon Inspection an Report of icalErlgineering $erv~CeS Geotechn , Church Additio Tigard 15t Baptist e street . x'1075 SW Gaard : . • Tigard, Oregon t Number Gp502465. CGT projec prepared for: ell ~ Mr. Larry Ab ; Architects L. Street ? n 805 SE'sherm Portland, Oregon 97214 ; February 16 2005 ; C a d.s' O G e O 1, e.C n i ca1 Main Office. Salem Office Bend Office P.O. Box 23814 4060 Hudson Ave., NE P.O. Box 7918 A Division of Carlson Testing, Inc. Tigard, Oregon 97281 Salem; OR 97301 Bend, OR 97708 .Geotechnical Consulting Phone (503) 684-3460 Phone (503) 589-1252 Phone (541) 330-9155 Construction Inspection and Related Tests FAX (503) 670-9147 FAX (503) 589-1309 FAX (541) 330.9163 February 16, 2005 Mr. Larry Abell Architects LA 805 SE Sherman Street Portland, Oregon 97214 Report of Geotechnical Engineering Services Tigard 1s` Baptist Church Addition 11075 SW Gaarde Street Tigard, Oregon CGT Project Number G0502465 Dear Mr. Abell: Carlson Geotechnical is pleased to submit the results' of our Report of Geotechnical Engineering Services for, the Tigard 1" Baptist Church' Addition site located at 11075 SW Gaarde Street in Tigard, Oregon. We performed our work in general accordance with CGT Proposal P03346, dated January 18, 2005. You provided written authorization for our services on January 21, 2005. We appreciate the opportunity to work.with you on this project. Please call if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, Carlson Geotechnical David P. Holt, PE Senior Geotechnical Engineer Attachments TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 . PROJECT INFORMATIONAND SITE DESCRIPTION........:....:..:. "5 Project Information..* 5 Site.Geology . 6 Site Surface Conditions : 6 Site Subsurface Conditions.: 7 Field Exploration 7 Subsurface Materials,..::.:: Ground Water CONCLUSIONS : . 9. RECOMMENDATIONS 10 Site Preparation 10 .Wet Weather Considerations Structural Fill......................................... 11 On-site Materials 11 Imported Granular Material...... • - ,t Shallow Foundations 12 Bearing Pressure and Settlement...........:..,..' • 13, Lateral Ca acit P Y 13 Drainage 13 Retaining Walls........:.......... Drainage 14 . • Floor Slabs . . . 14 Asphalt Pavements................ . 15 Drainage Considerations _ 16 Utility, Trenches Utility Trench Excavation Trench Backfill Material 17 Permanent Slopes 1 • Seismic Design Liquefaction 18 OBSERVATION OF.CONSTRUCTION':..:'.:.........::.. 19 -LIMITATIONS:.::.:. . ' 20 Tigard 1s' Baptist Church Addition 'Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 INTRODUCTION ; This report presents the' results,, of our, geotechnical investigation for -the Tigard I 'Baptist Church Addition site located at 110,76 SW Gaarde Street in Tigard, Oregon. The, location of the site is. shown on `the 'attached Site, Location, 'Figure 1. The purpose, of our geotechnical investigation was to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site in order to provide geotechnical- engineering recommendations for' design and construction of the development. Our scope of. work, included the following: • Contact. the Oregon' Utilities : Notification Center 1o mark the locations of ' public utilities at the site Within a 20-foot radius of our soil boring locations. • Explore subsurface soil. conditions' at the life by,. advancing four (4) soil borings to depths •of,,11%2 to 16%2Jeet below ground surface (bgs) within. parking lot areas, and two (2) soil borings to depths of 31,%2 to 41%2 feet bgs within the, addition area., The borings were performed using a Geoprobe 6620DT soil, probe machine provided and operated by personnel from Geo Tech Explorations, Incorporated of Tualatin; Oregon Classify.the,materials encountered.in.the explorations in general accordance ' ,with American' Society for •Testing.and Materials' (ASTM) D2487,, and ASTM D2488: A qualified member, of CGT's staff. maintained a detailed log of each soil boring: • .Collect re resentative, soil samples from within the'soil borings 'in. order to verify our field class ifications,'and perform laboratory testing. Complete twenty-five (25)- moisture content tests on representative samples obtained from the'soil: borings. The moisture content tests were performed in general accordance,with ASTM D 2216. Complete•three (3)•sieve analyses on representative samples obtained from the soil borings in order to determine percenf passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve. The .sieve= analyses were performed in. general accordance with: ASTM C 117, respectively: " • Provide recommendations' forsite 'preparation, grading and drainage, stripping depths, fill type for :imported materials, compaction criteria, cut and fill slope criteria, trench -excavation and b"aekfill, use of. on-site soils, and wet/dry weather earthwork: • Provide geotechnical-engineering- recommendations for design , and construction *,of shallow ,spread foundations, including an allowable design bearing pressure, and minimum footing depth and width requirements. Estimate, settlement of footings for the assumed design loads. Carlson Geotech'6ical Page 4 of 21 Tigard I" Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February•16, 2005 • Provide ' recommendations for design and construction of -retaining walls, including equivalent fluid pressures for retained soil,' and.,backfill, compaction, and drainage criteria.' - 'Provide : geotechnical-engineering 'recommendations for design and construction 'of concrete'. floor. 'slabs,, 'including, an anticipated value for subgrade' modulus, %and. recommendations. for a capillary, break and vapor retarder: . Estimate settlement of.floor slabs for the assumed design' loads. Provide design pavement sections,' ',including aggregate base. and asphalt concrete thicknesses for parking and drive lane areas, based on an assumed California Bearing Ratio (CBR)..Value for the oh-site-soils, and assumed traffic loading. • Provide recommendations;- for `subsurface drainage . of, foundations, floor slabs, and pavements, if necessary. • Provide recommendations `for the. InternationalBuilding, Code (IBC) Site Class, mapped maximum considered earthquake : spectral response accelerations, site seismic, coefficients, and,Seismic Design Category. w• Qualitatively evaluate liquefaction potential of%the' soils encountered within', . . the depths explored. • Provide a~ written' report. summarizing the 'results., of our fgeotechnical investigation. PROJECT INFORMATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION Project Information Development will consist of construction of` an approxirnate '8,500-square-foot, single-story, . freestanding; building addition with possible'full basement,.and associated paved parking,'drive,' lanes; 'and underground utilities'.. , The. addition will be located on the west side of the existing church within an existing, asphalt paved, parking. lot,: Detailed' structural information has not, ' been 'provided; however, we have- assumed that maximum continuous wall and column loads will not exceed 3 kips per. lineal foot and 45 kips" respectively; and .that uniform floor loads will `be less than 100,pounds per square foot (psf). ,,The new, parking lots will be located north, and west'of'`the. addition, with the..west parking lot located at the base of an existing 2 to 2%H:lV (horizontal:,vertical) slope. In order to' ;acco'mmoddte-th6 west parking lot, a.'portion of,the hillside.; will be excavated, and a retaining wall will be constructed:, Height of the: retaining,wall'is unknown at this time.- Carl son Geotechnicat . Page 5 of 21 Tigard 1S' Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16. 2005. " Maximum cuts on the order- of 11 to 12 feet. are anticipatedprovided a -full basement is provided within the.building addition, with the finished floor elevation of the first floor located approximately 3 feet below current site grades.- An existing, single-story building located in the north parking'„lot area will be demolished., Site Geology Available geological mapping of the. area (Madin, 1990') indicates. that' the site is underlain by Pleistocene-Age, fine-grained, "catastrophic, flood deposits "(originating from glacial outburst floods of Lake Missoula) consisting of silt,. and sand extending to depths of approximately 40 feet bgs. These flood deposits are. underlain by 'Troutdale Formation gravels,- extending to depths of.about 150 feet bgs, that are interbedded with sandstone, siltstone, and. claystone. -.The Troutdale Formation gravels a?e 'underlain by Columbia,,River Basalt. Site Surface Conditions -;The site was bordered. by SW Gaarde Street on the :south; a, drainage creek and residential' development,on' the west, SW '110th Avenue, on 'the east, and 'residential development on the north. At the time of our field investigation, the following'site' conditions were observed. . Within the building addition'area, the* majority of'the. site was relatively level and. asphalt paved (reference. Photo 1 below). Along.the western boundary, of.the addition, the grade descended' .to the west at, an approximate 2 -to 2'/2H:.1 V gradient over a 'hori2ontal distance of about 15 feet, and was'grass covered (reference Photo 2 below). ; Photo. 1.- Looking north from"the south- `.,Photo 2.. Looking north from the central side' of,,the site. at existing parking southwest side of.the site of slope on lot. on west side" of church:' west side of parking lot in Photo 1. N 4 { , ~y.s~ 3 d~t~t' At '"~yn ate"'"' ,~r~`, t 1y ' .i.L'4::.i•~.... Z •.~::a .a'. .'.GYra~('•~"j'..+J._u~WG _ ~aur - Madin,, 1990. • Earthquake Hazard' Geology' Maps of the` Portland Metropolitan, Area,.,Oregon Beaverton . Quadrangle. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries., Open File Report 0-90-2. 1990. .Carlson Geotechnical Page 6 of. 21 { Tigard I" Baptist Church Addition' Tigard, Oregon; G0502465' February16; 2005 ; " . Within the west parking lot area;: the site sloped to .the west at'.an approximate gradient of 5H:1 V, and was grass cove'red'(reference Photo 2 above). The'area within the north parking lot sloped gently to the west.' The north half .o'f'the•site"was grass covered, while the south'half was-asphalt paved (reference Photos .8 & 4'below)'. An existing, single-story, slab=on-grade, building was located, within the central portion of the site. Photo. 3. Looking north from' the north Photo 4.. Looking south, from the north end of the existing. church.'. , central side of the-site. } f • No signs.of slope instability; such.as tension cracks, slumps, etc.,. were noted at the. site, '-Site Subsurface Conditions Field Exploration .Six Standard .Penetration Test (SPT)~ soil' borings (B-1 through 13-6); four (4)" boring's to depths of 11Y2 to 16% feet below ground surface, (bgs) within parking" lot areas",and, two' (2) borings to - depths of 31%2 to 4"1%2 feet-bgs~within the. building addition. area,.were* advanced'at the site on February .1', 2005. 'The. borings were "performed using -a,Geoprobe 6620DT soil probe. machine provided and operated by personnel from. Geo-Tech. Explorations, Incorporated of Tualatin, Oregon.. The approximate boring locations'`are shown on the attached ,Site Plan, Figure 2. The borings were located in the "field using a_ measuring wheel,. and marking. off distances from existing, site features shown on,. the Site Plah.z. A. member of CGT's " staff logged the 'soils observed-within the borings in general accordance with the, Unified Soil Classification System . (USCS), .and,collected representative samples 'of the materials encountered: We have provided an-explanation' of the USCS.on, the., attached., Soil Classification Criteria and Terminology; Figure 3. ' Our laboratory staff visually examined all samples returned to our laboratory in order r to refine the field classifications: °Logs of the borings are presented on the attached Figures 4 Carlson Geotechnical ' , Page 7 of 2'1 Tigard 1," Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 . through 9: Results of the moisture content .tests and sieve analyses are shown on the attached logs. The SPT is 'performed by driving, a 2-inch, outside-diameter; split=spoon. sampler 'into the .undisturbed formation located at the bottom of the advanced probe with `repeated blows of a 140-pound, pin-guided; automatic hammer falling a "vertical distance of 30 inches. The number of blows, N-Value, required to drive the sampler, one foot, the last' 12 inches of an 18-inch sample interval, is used to,measure the soil consistency (cohesive soil), or relative density (non cohesive soils). It should be noted that automatic hammers' generally, produce lower SPT values than those obtained using a traditional safety hammer. ' Studies have 'generally indicated that penetration' resistances may vary.by a factor of 1 %2 to 2 between,the r two methods. We. have considered ` this in our description of soil, consistency; and 'in' our, evaluation of "soil strength and compressibility. Subsurface Materials Building Addition Area (B-4 and 13-5)." We, encountered medium stiff;. transitioning Jo soft:with depth,',moist; brown; silt fill (ML) with trace to some gravel at the surface'of B-4 that extended`to a depth--of approximately 6%2 feet , bgs: The top 4 inches of the silt fill was rooted. Within B-5, we• encountered 1'/2 inches of asphalt pavement underlain. by 4. inches of dense, moist, gray, gravel fill'(GP) at the surface. The,fill within both borings was underlain by'native, stiff,; transitioning to medium stiff to stiff with depth, moist to., very . moist' to wet with depth, brown-gray' (mottled) silt (ML) with sand that ' .extended to the approximate'.31%2 to 41%2-foot depths of. exploration- with inthe.borings., Parking Lot Areas (B-1 through B-3, and B-6) y We, encountered medium, stiff, moist, brown-orange, silt fill (ML). at'the surface of B-1 and B-2' that extended to depths' of about 2%2 to 3%2 feet bgs. The top•4 inches of the silt fill was rooted. Within 6=6; we encountered 1%2 inches,, of. asphalt pavement ''underlain by ±6 inches;of dense;', moist, gray, gravel fill '(GP) at the surface.' Beneath the fill. within all'three (3) borings, and at the surface of B-3, we encountered native, medium: stiff to stiff, moist, to very moist to' wet with depth, brown-gray (mottled),silt (ML)' with sated that extended to the 'approximate 11 %2 to 16%2-' foot depths of exploration within%the borings. The subsurface materials are described • 'in more; "detail on the. attached soil boring logs, Figures 4 through' 9. Carlson Geotechnical " , ~ - , d;•'.. Page Spf 21 . . Tigard 15' Baptist'Church Addition. Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 Ground Water i. Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from approximately 7% to 10 feet bgs within the parking lot borings, with the exception of B-3 where no ground water was observed,'and 21 to 22%2 feet bgs within, the building addition borings:' The ground. water levels. were measured in the borings completed on February 1, 2005. The presence of mottled coloration .within the on- ,,site,; native silts (ML) is considered an indicator of` fluctuating ground * water levels. We anticipate that ground water. levels will fluctuate due to seasonal variations in precipitation, changes in site utilization,,,-. or other factors. Additionally, the on-site silts are conducive to the ' 'formatiomof perched water,tables.' CONCLUSIONS We encountered fill soils extending to a depth of.approximately. 6%2 feet bgs within the building addition area. The fill .soils consisted of..medium, stiff, •transitioning to soft, with depth, moist, brown,,silt fHIJIVIL) with trace to some gravel. Direct-support of building foundations on these soils is'not recommended due to the variability- of these :soils,- and the potential for excessive total and differential settlements.' Floor slabs ;may be supported on these soils provided the recommendations contained within:the Site Preparation section of this report are-followed. Building foundations should bear on the native, medium,. stiff to stiff, brown-gray silt (ML) with sand,' or on- structural fill that is properly placed and 'compacted on this material during construction. The native silt was generally encountered at depths ranging from approximately %2 to 6%2 feet bgs within the building 4addition borings:,' Fill soils••were also encountered within some of the, parking lot borings. The fill soils consisted of `medium stiff, brown-orange, silt fill (ML) that extended to,depths of about 2%2 to 3%2 feet bgs. The fill soils. 'were- underlain' by native, medium',stiff to stiff, brown-gray silt (ML) with sand. Pavements may be, supported on both the native silt and silt fill soils, or'on structural fill that'is properly ''placed ands compacted: on these,,, materials during construction provided the recommendations contained within, the Site Preparation section -of this report are followed .The following paragraphs present specific geote.chnical recommendations for design and construction of the development.., Carlson Geotechni'cal Page 9 of 21, Tigard 15' Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 RECOMMENDATIONS Site Preparation. . Surface vegetation, organic topsoil, :and asphalt pavement should be stripped and removed from proposed building and pavement locations, and for a 5-foot-margin around such locations. Based on the results of our field explorations, the depth of, surface vegetation and organic topsoil stripping within proposed building and pavement locations will be on the order of about 6 inches. The depth., of asphalt pavement stripping within proposed building and pavement locations will be on the order of 'about 2 inches. A geotechnical representative from CGT should provide recommendations for actual stripping depths based on observations during site stripping. Stripped surface vegetation and 'organic topsoil should be transported' off-site for disposal, or stockpiled for later use in landscaped areas. Stripped asphalt pavement should be transported off-site for disposal, or stockpiled and processed for re-use as structural fill- as recommended in the Structural Fill (On-Site Materials) section of this report. Grubbing of trees should include the removal of the root mass, and roots greater than '/2=inch in diameter. Grubbed material should be transported off-site for disposal. Existing footings, foundation walls, and slabs-on-grade associated 'with buildings identified for demolition should be completely removed and disposed off-site. After site preparation as recommended above, and prior to excavation for footings, a representative from CGT should observe a proofroll of the exposed subgrade soils in order to identify areas of excessive yielding.. If areas of soft soil or excessive yielding are identified, the affected material should be overexcavated to firm, stable subgrade, and replaced with compacted materials as recommended for'structural fill. Areas that appear too soft and wet to support proofrolling equipment should be prepared in general accordance with the recommendations for wet weather construction given below. Silt fences, hay bales, buffer zones of natural growth, sedimentation ponds, and granular haul roads should be used as required to reduce sediment transport during, construction to acceptable levels. Measures to reduce erosion should be implemented in general accordance with State of Oregon Administrative, Rules 340-41-006 and 340-41-455, and Washington County regulations regarding erosion control. Wet Weather Considerations The on-site silts (ML) are highly susceptible to disturbance during wet weather. Trafficability of these soils may be difficult, and significant damage to subgrade soils could occur if earthwork is undertaken. without proper precautions at times when the exposed- soils are more than a few percentage points above optimum moisture content. Carlson Geotechnical Page 10 of 21 Tigard 1s` Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 For construction that occurs during,, the. wet season," the site preparation activities may need to be accorriplished' using track-mounted equipment, loading removed 'material into ; trucks. supported on granular haul roads, or other methods: to limit. soil disturbance. A - qualified geotechnical engineer should: evaluate the' subgrade 'during excavation by probing 'rather than proofrolling. Soils that have been disturbed during site preparation activities, or soft or loose " • ' , areas identified during probing,. should be overexcavated to'firm, stable subgrade; and replaced with structural fill. Haul, roads subjected to, repeated heavy construction' traffic will require a minimum of 18 inches of imported granular' material. Twelve inches. of, imported. granular material should be sufficient' • for light'staging, areas. „ The imported granular .material, should consist of crushed rock that is • well-graded. between coarse and, fine, contains no organic matter; debris, .,or particles larger than. 4 inches. and has. less than 5 percent material','by weight passing the' U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve.' The import ed granular material 'should be placed in one lift over.the prepared, undisturbed subgrade, and :compacted using a smooth-drum, non=vibratory roller. ' . We recommend that a -geotextile fabric ,be placed, as a barrier, between. the subgrade and imported fill in areas, of repeated. construction traffic.,. The geotextile fabric should have a minimum Mullen burst-strength. of 250-pounds per square inch for puncture. resistance, and, an `apparent, open ing,size.(AOS) between the;U.S. Standard No: 70 and No. 100 Sieves.. Structural Fill On-site Materials Use of-the on-site sifts (ML), free .of organic matter and debris,',:a's structural fill may be difficult. because'silt'is.sensitive 1to small changes in moisture content a.nd is.difficult, if not impossible, ' to adequately compact during wet weather. We anticipate that the. moisture content of,the on- site' silts will'.be higher than. the optimum 'moisture' 'content .for satisfactory compaction. Therefore, moisture.. conditioning (drying)- should: be. -expected in order to. achieve adequate compaction. When used, as structural fill, the" oh-site silts should be placed in .lifts with a maximum thickness of about .8 inches, and compacted to not' less than 92 percent -of the materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM, D 1557. If the.. on-site silts* cannot be properly moisture-conditioned, 'we recommend using imported ..granular material for'structural fill. Use of the on-site gravel fill (GP),,. free. of•organic matter, debris; and particles larger than,1'/2. inches-,, as 'structural -fill is not anticipated to be .unusually difficult: When.used as structural fill, .the on-site:grayel should be'moisture, conditioned, placed in lifts with a maximum'.thickness, of •Carlson•GWechnical -Y ' . Page 11 of 21` Tigard'15f Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 about 12 inches, and compacted toy snot less than 95'percent of the, materials maximum dry- density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D'1557'. If used as structural fill, on=site, stockpiled, asphalt should be processed into material that is fairly well graded between coarse and fine, and':contain no organic matter, debris, or particles larger than 1,%Z inches. When used as structural. fill; the-.processed-asphalt shouid be moisture, conditioned; placed in lifts'with a maximum thickness' of_about 12 inches, and compacted to'not less than 95 percent of the, materials ,maximum' dry: density,. as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557: Imported Granular Material . Imported granular. structural fill should consistof angular pit or'quarry run rock, crushed rock, or crushed.,gravel and sand that is fairly"Well-graded between coarse 'and .fine particle sizes. The granular fill should contain no organic matter, debris, or'-particles' larger than 1%2 inches, and have less than 5 percent material passing the U.S.-Standard No. 200 Sieve. The percentage of fines can be increased to 12. percent of the material passing the US. Standard No. 200 Sieve if placed during dry weather, and provided the fill material is .moisture-conditioned; as necessary, for proper, compaction.. Granular fill material should, be moisture'conditioned, placed in rifts with . a' maximum thickness of about 12 inches, and compacted to'not less than 95 percent of the materials maximum 'dry density, as determined in :'general., accordance with ASTM D 1557. During fhe' wet season, :or. when wet subgrade.conditions exist, the initial lift thickness should be . increased to 24,inches, and should be compacted,by, rollingwith a,smooth-drum, non-vibratory roller. ' Shallow Foundations We recommend that building addition foundations bear on the native,. medium, stiff to stiff silt (ML)-with sand,,oron structural fill that.is properly placed a,nd compacted on this.material during construction. The native silt was generally, encountered at depths ranging,from approximately %Z to 6%z feet bgs within the building addition borings:, -if soft or otherwise'unsuitable soils'are encountered, . they. should ' be overexcavated as, recommended by' the CGT geotechnical engineer.' The ''resulting overexcavation should , be brought back- to grade with granular structural fill: All granular pads for footings, should be constructed a minimum of 6' inches wider • • 1 on each side of the-footing for,every vertical foot bf'overexcavation. Footings constructed within 'slopes should have a minimum. of 5 feet-between the -face of the slope, and the bottom, outside edge of the, footing. Carlson Geotechnical, Page.12.of 21 Tigard 15' Baptist Church Addition. Tigard, Oregon G0502465. February 16, 2005 We.recommend that all individual spread footings have a minimum width of 24 inches, and the base of the Jootings 'to founded at least 18 inches below the' lowest' adjacent grade. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width. of 18 inches, arid 6e founded a minimum of 18 inches below the, lowest adjacent grade. Excavations near footings should not extend, within a' 1 H:1 V (horizontal:vertical) plane projected out and down from the outside' bottom edge of the footings. Bearing Pressure and Settlement . Footings founded as recommended should be' proportioned for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. This bearing pressure is a-net bearing pressure,.and applies to. the total of `dead and long-term live, loads, and may be increased by 1/3 when considering. " 'seismic or wind loads. For the recommended design bearing pressure,: total settlement,of footings is anticipated to be less.than 1 inch. Differential settlements should' not exceed V2-inch. Lateral Capacity We recommend using a passive earth pressure'of'250 pounds per.cubic foot (pct) for design for footings confined by th'e' native, medium stiff tostiff silt (ML) with sand, or structural fill that is properly placed and compacted during construction. The recommended earth pressure was computed using 'a factor of safety:of '1 %2, which is appropriate due to the amount of movement required to develop full passive resistance. In order to develop the above capacity, concrete must,'be poured neat in excavations, the adjacent grade must be level, and the static ground 'water level must remain below the base-,of the footings throughout the year. Adjacent floor slabs, pavements, or the upper 12-inch-depth of adjacent, unpaved areas should not be considered"when calculating passive resistance. An ultimate coefficient of, friction' equal to'0.35 may be used when calculating resistance to sliding, for footings founded. on the native, medium stiff to. stiff, silt (ML) with sand, or on structural fill that'is properly. placed and compacted on this material during construction. Drainage We recommend placing foundation drains at the base'elevations of the footings on the outside.' of the footings.. Foundation drains should 'consist .of, a, 4-ihch-d ia mete e,perforated,. drainpipe wrapped with 'a geotextile filter fabric. The drains should be backfilled' with a minimum of 1 cubic foot'oer'foot of open„graded drain rock, which should be encased in a geotextile fabric Carlson Geotechnical „ Page 13.of 21 Tigard I" Baptist-Church Addition Tigard, Oregon ' G0502465 February .16, 2005 :.t,... ' in order to provide separation from the' surrounding silt. CGT. should be contacted to ,observe the drain. prior to backfilling. Retaining Walls Retaining, wall, footings should be designed and constructed in•"general accordance with the, recommendations contained' in the Shallow Foundations section of this report.. For retaining walls `not' restrained from rotation, we, recommend,"using . an equivalent fluid pressure of ,35 pcf for design for level ,backfill,-and 60.pcf for sloping backfill with a maximum gradient of : 2H:1 V. For retaining walls, restrained from rotation,, we `recommend using an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pcf` for level backfill, and 90 pcf for sloping'backfill ;with a maximum gradient-of 2HAV. ' ,.Retaining,walls.shbuld, be backfilled with imported, granular, material compacted to a minimum of. 90 percent of. materials maximum, dry density, as determined in, general accordance with ASTM .,D 1557 (Modified Proctor).' " ..The above design recommendations are based 'on the assumptions that:'(1) the walls consist of conventional cantilevered retaining walls or embedded building.walls,.(2) the walls.are less.than. 8 feet in height, (3) the backfill'is•level, drained, and consists,of imported granular material, and (4) no surcharges are imposed behind the walla Re-evaluation of our recommendations will be required if the retaining wall design,criteria for the, project vary from these assumptions. Drainage We recommend placing wall drains behind the ,retaining walls at, the; base of the walls. Wall " drains should.'consist of a 4-inch-diameter;, perforated, drainpipe wrapped with a geo'textile filter fabric. The drains should be backfilled with a minimum of,.1 cubic foot per foot of open graded drain rock. • CGT shouldd be cortacted to observe the drain prior to backfilling. Floor Slabs r- Satisfactory subgrade support for floor slabs 'constructed on grade, supporting up to 100 psf area loading, can. be obtained from the medium stiff, silt fill (ML), the, native, medium stiff to stiff silt (ML) witli sand, or on structural,fill.that,is`properly,placed, and compacted on these materials.,. during `construction. If soft or 'otherwise unsuitable soils are encountered, they should- be overexcavated as recommended*, by the ' CGT." 'geotechnical engineer. The • resulting overexcavation should be brought back to grade with granular structural fill. ; Carlson Geotechnicaf Page 14 of 21 'Tigard 151 Baptist Church Addition Tigard, :Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 , A minimum 6-inch-thick layer of 3/4-inch-minus, ' crushed rock base containing' less than 5 percent material passing the U.S. Standard No.. 200 Sieve should be placed over the prepared. subgrade in; order to provide'.a more uniform surface for placing concrete, and supporting the -slab. The crushed rock should be moisture conditioned, placed in lifts with a. maximum. thickness of about 6 inches, and compacted to , not -less than 95 percent of the materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. With the crushed rock base, a-subgrade. modulus of 150 pounds per cubicinch can be used for the design of the floor.slab. Floor slabs constructed as recommended will likely settle less than Y2- inch. We recommend that slabs be jointed- around columns and walls to permit slabs and foundations to settle differentially. The surface of the base rock should be choked with sand just prior to concrete placement. Choking th& base rock surface reduces the lateral restraint on the bottom of the concrete during curing. Due to the presence of on-site,, fine-grained silt near the surface' 'of the site, liquid moisture and moisture vapor should be expected at the subgrade surface. The mottled coloration of the on- site; native silts is. an indication of fluctuating ground .water levels; and suggests., that ground ' water may be' present within a few ,feet beneath floor slabs during-:wet times 'of the year: A capillary break, consisting of,at.least'6 inches of crushed rock base having less than 5' percent " of the material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200.. Sieve,, typically provides protection against liquid moisture. Where moisture vapor ,emission .th'rough' the slab must be 'minimized, e.g.; impervious floor coverings, storage of moisture sensitive materials directly on the slab surface, etc., a vapor retarding membrane or vapor. barrier, below the slab should be" considered.' Factors such as cost," special considerations for construction,' floor coverings, and .end use suggest that the decision regarding' a vapor retarding membrane or vapor- barrier, be made by the architect and owner: Asphalt? avements i Satisfactory subgrade support for asphalt pavements constructed on grade can be obtained, from the medium stiff, silt fill (ML), the native, medium_ stiff to stiff silt (ML) with sand; ,or on structural fill that is properly placed and compacted on these materials during" construction." If soft or otherwise unsuitable soils, are encountered, they should , be overexcavated as . recommended by the CGT •gdotechnical engineer. The resulting overexcavation should.-be brought back to grade,with granular structural fill.. Carlson Geotechnical Page'15 of 21, Tigard 151 Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 We recommend a minimum asphalt pavement section of: Table 1. Recommended Minimum Asphalt Pavement Section .y:i 4 Sx t' y4 .`CC - ~ }'eL. ♦t e Yd' 's. f"'+3 Y.t •S.~ r b W ' Sa ON Entrance &'SeNice`"Roads* 'Car Par** • • ' ;Material ,rvR "'.~"'..~~~n2~>~`~- •.r~,~, Thickness 11 ' T z :T (finches) hckness~(mches)~3 ; . n.{AS},.} F=.....Y t. ...i.y irf ti 5 w ` : x Asphalt Pavement 31/2 21/2 Crushed Rock Base Course 8 6 " 'Based on 5 trucks and 500 cars per day "Based on 1 truck and 300'cars per day. The design of the recommended asphalt pavement section is based on an assumed California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of 3 for the on-site silts, and on'the assumption that construction will be completed during an extended period. of dry weather. Increased base rock sections, and/or a separation geotextile fabric may be, required in wet. conditions in order to support construction traffic, and protect the subgrade. Asphalt pavement, and base course material should conform to the 2002 State ofOregon, Standard- Specifications for Highway Construction'. Place aggregate base in one lift, and compact to not less than 95 percent'of the materials maximum dry-density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557.'. Asphalt pavement should be compacted to at least 91 percent of the materials theoretical maximum density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 2041 (Rice Specific Gravity): Drainage Considerations We 'recommend that subsurface drains be connected -to the nearest storm, drain or other suitable discharge point. We also recommend. that paved surfaces, and ground near or adjacent to the building be sloped to drain away from the' building. Surface water from pavement surfaces and open spaces should be collected and routed to a suitable discharge point. Runoff from roof and pavement areas should 'not be directed into the foundation drain system. Utility,Trenches Utility Trench Excavation Trench cuts should 'stand near vertical to depths of approximately 4 feet in the medium stiff to stiff silts (ML) provided no ground water seepage .is observed in the-sidewalls. If seepage is Carlson deotechnical Page 16 of 21 Tigard 15' Baptist Church,Addition „ Tigard, Oregon . G0502465 February 16, 2005 encountered that undermines the'st'ability of the trench, or caving of the sidewalls is observed during excavation, the sidewalls should"be flattened or shored.* Trench dewatering may be required'to maintain dry working conditions if the invert elevations of the proposed utilities are below the ground water level. Pumping from sumps located within the trench will likely be effective in removing water resulting from. seepage. If ground. water is present at the base of utility, excavations, we recommend placing trench stabilization material at the base of the excavations. Trench stabilization material should consist. of 1-foot of well- graded gravel, crushed gravel, or. crushed rock with a maximum particle size of 4 inches, and less than 5 percent material passing the 'U.S. Standard No. 4 Sieve. The material should be free of organic matter and other deleterious material, and-'should be placed in one lift and compacted until well'-keyed. While we have described certain approaches to the trench excavation, it is. the contractor's responsibility to select the excavation and dewatering methods, to monitor the trench excavations for safety, and to provide any shoring required to protect personnel and adjacent improvements. All trench excavations should be in accordance with applicable OSHA and state regulations. ; Trench Backfill Material Trench backfill for the utility pipe base-and pipe zone. should consist of well-graded granular material containing no organic matter or debris, have a maximum particle size of 3/4-inch, and have less than 8 percent material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve. Backfill for the pipe base and within the pipe zone should be moisture conditioned, placed in maximum .12-inch-thick lifts, and compacted to not less than 90 percent of the materials maximum dry density, as determined, in . general accordance with ASTM D 1557, or as recommended by the pipe manufacturer. Backfill above the pipe zone should be moisture conditioned,, placed in maximum 12-inch-thick lifts, and compacted to not less than 92"percent of the materials maximum dry, density, as determined 'in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. Trench backfill located within 2 feet of finished subgrade elevation should be moisture conditioned, placed in maximum .,12-inch-thick lifts, and compacted to not less than 95 percent .of the. materials maximum dry density,: as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. Carlson Geotechnical ; Page 17 of 21 Tigard 15f Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February , 16; 2005 Permanent Slopes - Permanent slopes should not exceed 2H:1 V. Adjacent,on-site and off=site structures should, be 'located at least,5 feet-from the top'of slopes. Footings constructed within slopes should have a minimum of 5 feet between'the'face of the slope, and the bottom, outside edge of the footing. Seismic Design 'Based on the results of our subsurface explorations 'and analyses, the following International Building Code (IBC) design criteria were computed using•the 2003 IBC; Table 2. IBC Design Criteria IBC Coefficient Value IBC Source Site Clas's D -Table 1615.1.1 " Ss. 1.05. Figure 1615(1x) Fa 1:08 Table 1615.1:2(1) S, 0:37 Figure 1615(2) F~ '1.66 Table 1615.1.2(2) SMs 1.1.3 , Equation 16,-38 SM; 0.611. Equation 16-39 Sos 0.75 Equation 16-40 So,. .0.41 Equation 16-41 Category*. II Table 1604.5 Seismic Use Group I Paragraphs 11616:2:,1`, 1616.2.2; or'1616.2.3 Seismic Design D . ' Tables 1616.3(1), and Category '1616..3(2) "If this is not correct, please inform us in . writing so that changes to our recommendations can be made, if warranted. Liquefaction In general, liquefaction occurs when deposits of loose, saturated soils,. generally sands, and sand-silt, mixtures, are subjected to strong `earthquake••shaking: If these deposits cannot drain ! rapidly, • there. Will be an increase -in the pore water pressure. With' increasing oscillation, the Carlson Geotechnical Page 18 of 21 Tigard 1s` Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February. 16, 2005 . pore water pressure can increase to the value of the.,overburden pressure., The shear strength of a cohesionless soil is' directly proportional to the effective stress, which is equal to the difference between the overburden pressure' and the pore water pressure. When .the pore water pressure increases to the value of the overburden pressure, the shear strength of the soil reduces to zero, and the soil deposit turns into a liquefied state. The following parameters are generally used to designate non-liquefiable, fine-grained soils: • Fines content (percent passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve) greater than 80 percent. Clay content (particle size less than 0.005 mm) exceeding 20 percent. . • Liquid limit greater than 35 percent. • Water content less than 90 percent of the liquid limit. Due to the fine-grained nature of .the on-site silts (ML) encountered at this site, within the depths explored, this soil is considered non-liquefiable., OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION Satisfactory pavement and earthwork performance depends to a large degree on the quality of construction. Sufficient observation of the contractor's activities is a key part of determining that the work is completed in accordance with the construction drawings and specifications. Subsurface conditions observed . during construction should be compared with those encountered. during subsurface explorations, and recognition of changed conditions often requires experience. We recommend that qualified personnel visit the. site with sufficient frequency to detect whether subsurface conditions change significantly from those observed to date and anticipated in this report.. We recommend that site stripping, rough grading, foundation, floor slab, and pavement subgrades, and placement of engineered fill are observed by the project geotechnical engineer or their representative. Because observation is typically performed on an on-call basis, we ' recommend that the earthwork contractor be held contractually responsible for scheduling observation. Carlson Geotechnical Page 19 of 21 Tigard 15` Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by the owner/developer and other members of the design and construction team for the proposed. development. The opinions and recommendations contained within this report are not intended to be, nor;should they be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions, but are forwarded to assist in the planning and design process. We have made observations based on our explorations that indicate the soil conditions at only those specific locations and only to the, depths penetrated. These observations do not necessarily reflect soil types, strata thickness, or water'level variations that may exist between explorations. If subsurface conditions vary from those encountered in our site exploration, CGT should be alerted to, the change in conditions so. that we. may. provide additional .geotechnical recommendations, if necessary. Observation by experienced.geotechnical personnel should be' considered an integral part, of the construction process. The owner/developer is, responsible for insuring that the':' project designers and contractors ..implement our recommendations. When the design has been finalized, we recommend,that the design and 'specifications be reviewed by our firm to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. If design changes are made, we request that we be retained to review our conclusions -and. recommendations and to provide'.a written modification .or verification. . The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques,- . sequences, or procedures, except as. specifically described in our report for consideration, in design.' Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally: accepted practices in -this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions express or implied; should be understood. Carlson Geotechnical Page 20 of 21 Tigard 15' Baptist Church Addition please Tigard. Qfegon th►s project. G0502465 6, 2005 our 'geotechnical consultant on Februaryto, serve as y the opportunity V\le appreciate uestions• contact us it you have any q SincerSON GE4TECNNICA►L CARL ~~)PROF, s cam.-4i 60337FE r OREGON A q 1 . O h, PE. Weyrauc wife": W illiam M ° Engineer r Senio Gegtechnica1 David,P° Holt, P- ineer Senior Geotechnical En9 n Figure ents: Site Locatio , 2 Figure 3 Attachm Figure d Terminology Site Pian, Criteria-ari " . Soil Classification Figures 4 through 9 ~:doc tist Church Geo Repo Soil Boring Logs' ects\Tigard 1st Baptist Ctiurch\Tigard 1st BaP Ep7BCH\PROJECTS\2005 Prol poc Ira: P:\G. Page 21 of 21 ical Carlson Geotechn SITE LOCATION . TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD; OREGON 'yam =~2 l 1 (1`1 .3 ,f ~i q'',~ i t . rr•. ~I`~_- .a`~f .ti_'r _ faY~. ~y 4'~ T knK~ ,±I: j• 'J . '.\y ♦ Sri 1 -T•.• • ! 1 V t1K O~,i,I- ~ 1 Ar , ~ • ~ f '~~,I tr r ~ ~ ~,/i_ ••y ~ ' yr-` ! ~~a fig ,~a. ~ , ff , I r r+~ ~.r . i c~ • • y r rim-♦ ` SITE LOCATION 'f l.~aF`#; 9 ~'f• ~~r3--stye J: , t i .~C~ ir,.} ! : t . 't' ~ ~ ~ \ ( f0 ~ f ' r--. ,i• kJ•• fry ~ r. L'D `I L'. J(S1" I+. ' i +tf 1. _ r ~ "4-~ a : L'~ T r'•`~1 J/+~ -r•-•~ t i 1 rk ~ . ~ fit. ~ e~ f i~v • ~'r' ._~t l _ .y. :}k awc .r .y. ` R~.ryi'}• it 1 ,4{ 1. ih C_ 17 t y, ~ 4 ; k~~ 1-y~raater • _ 1 v'r . ~C j , . vttl t 1 ~~ru; • ~ ti~ . s , II) f C ~I` 4 fJt I f !r aP _ Map created with T0P0!1m @2000 Wild flower,Productions (www.topo'com). Scale 1 Inch - 2,000 feet USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series, Beaverton, OR'Quadrangle. Map version 1961. .Photorevised 1984. Township 2 South, Range ,.1 Kesf, Section 3.W.illamette.Meridian. 0 2000 4000 GP Carlson Geotechnical P.O: Box 23814 - CGT Job No. G0502465 RGURE 1 503-6® Tigard, Oregon 97281 SITE -PLAN TIGAR~, 'OREGON : TIST: CHURCH pDpIT14N. TIGARD FIRST BAP NORTH Y_.~'\s ` 8.3 '-0 _.B No. G0502465 CGT Job LEA ID 0210312005 NOTES: Larry Abell of Date: Site plan provided by . was repjoduced t] Location of drilled boring- j, Architects LA. Drawing CGT'staff. and modified r roximate. 120 feet . FIGURE 2• All locations are app Scale 1 inch P Carlson Geotechnical 240 U ~T? p.0. Box 23814 120 Tigard, Oregon 9721 31 0 - 563.6 SOIL CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA AND TERMINOLOGY TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH•ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON . Classification of Terms and Content USCS Grain Size NAME : MINOR Constituents (12-50%); MAJOR' Fines <#200 (.075 mm) Constituents (>50%); Slightly (5-12%) Sand Fine #200 #40 (.425 mm) Relative Density or Consistency Medium #40 - #10 (2 mm) Color Coarse #10 - #4 (4.75) Moisture Content, Gravel Fine #4 - 0.75 inch Plasticity Trace Constituents (0-5%0) Coarse 0.75 inch - 3 inches Cobbles 3 to 12 inches; Other: Grain Shape, Approximate gradation,' scattered <15% est., Organics, Cement, Structure, Odor....' numerous >15% est. Geologic Name or Formation: (Fill, Willamette Silt, Till, Boulders > 12 inches Alluvium,.:.) Relative Density or Consistency Granular Material Fine-Grained cohesive Materials , SPT SPT Torvane tst Pocket Pen tsf Manual Penetration Test N-Value Density, N-Value Sliear Stren th Unconfined Consistent <2 <0.13 >0.25 Ve ' Soft Easy several inches b fist . 0 - 4 Ve Loose 2 -4 0.13 0.25 0.25-0.50 _ Soft Easy several inches bthumb' 4-10 Loose 4 -8 0.25-0.50 0.50-1.00 Medium Stiff Moderate several inches b thumb 10 - 30 • Medium Dense 8 -.15 0.50-1.00 1.00-2.00 Stiff Readily indented b thumb 30 - 50 Dense 15 - 30 1.00-2.00 2.00-4.00, 'Very Stiff Readily Indented b thumbnail >50 Very Dense. • , >30 >2.00 >4.00 Hard Difficult b thumbnail Moisture Content Structure Dry: Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Stratified: Alternating layers of•material or color >6 mm thick Damp: Some moisture but leaves no moisture on hand Lamir ated: AItemating'layers < 6 mm thick Moist: Leaves moisture on hand Fissured: Breaks along definate fracture planes Wet: Visible free water, likely from below water table . Slickensided`. Striated, polished, or glossy fracture. planes Plasticity , DryStrength Dilatancy• Toughness Blocky: Cohesive soil that can be broken down into small angular lumps which resist.furtherbreakdown ML' Non to Low Non to Low -Slow to Rapid Low, can't roll Lenses: Has small pockets of different soils, note. thickness CL Low to Med. Medium to High None• to' Slow Medium Homogeneous:•Same color and appearance throughout " 'MH Med to'High Low to Medium None to Slow Low to Medium CH• Med to High High to V. High None High Unified Soil Classification Chart Visual=Manual Procedure Similar to•ASTM Designation D-2488 Major Divisions Group' Typical Names ° Symbols Coarse Gravels: 50% Clean GW Well graded ravels and ravel-sand mixtures little or no fines, Grained or more Gravels GP Poorly-graded ravels and ravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines Soils: retained on Gravels GM Silty ravels, ravel-sand-silt mixtures More than the No. 4 sieve with Fines GC Clayey ravels, ravel-sand-cla 'mixtures 50% retained Sands: more Clean SW Well-graded sands and ravel) sands, little or no fines . on, No. 200 than 50% Sands SP -Poor) -graded sands and gravelly sands, little or no fines sieve passing, the • . Sands' SM Silt sands, sand-silt mixtures No.,4'Sieve with Fines SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures Fine-Grained' ML Inorganic silts, rock flour, clayey silts . Soils: Silt and Clays CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, ravel) clays, sand clays, lean clays 50% or more Low Plasticity Fines OL Organic silt and organic silt clays of low plasticity Passes No. MH Inorganic silts, clayey silts 200-Sieve Silt and Clays CH Inorganic clays of high. plasticity, fat clays High Plasticity Fines OH: Organic clays of medium to high plasticity Highly Organic Soils PT Peat, muck, and other highly organic soils' ' Carlson Geotechnical P.O.Box 23814. CGT Job No. 00502465' FIGURE 3 . 503.684.3460 Tigard, Oregon 97281 EXPLORATORY BORING'LOG 'B-1 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCHADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 02/1/2005 Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations,, Inc... Logged By: Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable Z W w u _ `TEST RESULTS M~ a CO SOIL DESCRIPTION. a > o + Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot c~ ti z rn z 0 25 'so ML Medium stiff, brown-orange, SILT FILL with trace gravel; 8-1 7 0 d_ + ! ' i. ! _ _1 upper. 4 inches rooted; moist. X25 ML Stiff, brown-light gray (mottled), SILT with sand; moist. S-2 12 Very stiff below 5 feet. S-3 21 5 3 412 Medium stiff, gray; and.very moist below 7.5-feet., S74 6 ' , 1-33 Wet, with ground water level estimated at 10 feet. S-5 5 I ' ' o i i i I I l i 1 i I ' r _ is II A. 15 ® 0 S-6 5 i i i39 i Boring terminated. at 16.5 feet below ground, surface (bgs). Ground water was encountered at 10 feet bgs.: Boring was backfilled with granular bentonite on. 2/1/2005. 1 ! i 2 i I I 1 i : r a ~ I w 25 i` I I I L I I -12 I; t-- i . 30 - - -'I- I- r- - ' .35 i- Note: Boring backfilled with granular bentonite on 01%31105 L l egend =1 Water Level • Moisture Content in Percent CARLSON GEOTECHNICAL S-1 Dames & Moore•Sample. S`1 Split-spoon Sample S-1 Shelby Tube Sample P. O. Box 23814 ' Notes:' : Tigard, Oregon I. Soil interfaces and descriptions are interpretive and actual changes and transitions maybe gradual. 2. Water level is for. date shown and may vary with the time of year. 3. USC classifications are determined by visual-manual method. Figure: 4 EXPLORATORY 'BORING LOG B-2 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Project Number' G0502465' Date Drilled: 02/112005' 'Drilled by: GeoTech'Explorations„Inc. Logged. By: ,Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer . Surface Elevation: Unavailable v _ w w _ 'TEST RESULTS SOIL DESCRIPTION 3 a a o + Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot c~ rn z rn Z g 25 So ML Medium stiff, brown, SILT FILL with some gravel, upper 8-1 7 4 inches rooted; moist. - - S-2 7 ML Medium' stiff to stiff, brown=light gray'(mottled): SILT with i , sand; very moist. i S-3 8 ' S i ' X34 ' I a Soft, gray, and wet, with ground, water level estimated at ®0© S-4 2 42 . 7.5 feet.. A i Stiff below 10 feet: ©A9 S-5 12 1o i Ki -i 1 ; 1 , Boring terminated at 11.5'feet below ground surface (bgs). Ground water was' encountered.at 7.;.5 feet'bgs. . • Boring was backfilled with granular behtonite on 2/1/2005.. . ~ I I I i 3 I 'I i 15 ' 20 , i •1 i ! i L-L-L -LL 25 -4- J 30- 71 _ I Legend V Water Level • ~ ~ ~ ~ Moisture Content in Percent CARLSON GEOTECHN/CAL S-1 Dames.& Moore Sample, . S 1 Split-spoon Sample. S-1' Shelby Tube Sample., P. O. BOX 23814 Notes:. Tigard, Oregon 1. Soil interfaces and descriptions are interpretive and actual changes and transitions may be gradual. ^ ^ _ 2. Water level is for date shown and may vary with the time of year.. Figure: 5 3. •USC Gasifications are delermined by visual-manual method. - EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B-3• TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST=CHURCH ADDITION = TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465. Date Drilled: 0211/2005 Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations, Inc. Logged By: Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer, Surface Elevation: Unavailable v w w = TEST RESULTS SOIL DESCRIPTION 3 a a > o + Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot rnz Z 0 25 s0 ML Medium stiff, brown, SILT-with sand, upper 6,inches S-1 9 rooted; moist. - ; Slightly mottled below 2:5 feet. S-2 4 ! i I ! 26'' 5 S-3 4 l 128 i. Brown-light gray (mottled) below 6 feet. . l Stiff below 7.5 feet. S=4 14 g i 1- 10 I I I i S-5 8. tLL -4- 33 ; I Boring terminated at 11.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). ! I l i i i i I i Groundwater was not encountered. , Boring was backfilled with granular ben,tonite on 2/1/2005. I ' i i I I I I i. 15 , i i• F i. i i I 1 'i i I ,I I i. , .20 ' I ! I i I'I P i I i L-L I ' ! i' i I i 25 i i i 30 i i i , r-~ -T.., -4 -4 r - - -4 4- R7 -R- = Water Level • Moisture content in Percent CARLSON GEOTECHN/CAL S-1 Dames & Moore Sample: S-1. Split, spoon Sample. S-1 Shelby Tube Sample P. O. BOX 23814 Notes: Tigard, Oregon 1. Soil interfaces and descriptions are iriterpretive and actual changes and Vansitionsmay be gradual.' ' ',2. Water level is for dale shown and may vary, with the time or year. - . • Figure: I USc dassirications are determined by visual-manual method., - - - 6 LJ EXPLORATORY BORING,LOG B-4 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Project" Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 02/1/2005 Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations, Inc. Logged By: Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable Z w w _ TEST RESULTS M SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 3 Q M a > o ♦ Standard Penetration Test, Blows per foot _ `n z 0 2s SO ML Medium-stiff, brown, SILT FILL with some gravel, upper S-1 9 ! ! 4 inches rooted; moist. Soft, with trace gravel and fine sand below 2.5, feet. 8-2 2 28 _ 1 I 5 ! I Ii! !I S-3 4 i ML Stiff, brown-light gray (mottled), SILT with sand; moist. ~ i I I ~I II 1 73 percent passing the U.S. No. 200 Sieve. S-4 112 ! ! 28 ! !I L ' i ! , I I i! I I ' S-5 115 D I! 11 I 'I I ! ! I i I I !-.28 i I. I I I 15 ill Iii !I II Medium stiff, and very moist below 15 feet. S-6 5, 1 ! " i 20 I ! I I I I I ! I 1 1 S-7 4 I ! ! ! ! 33 I , 1 1 I ' ` ! i i I I i ! i i I Turns wet, with groundwater level estimated at ! ! i ! 1 ! ! ! 22.5 feet. p®p ! ! i ! ! ! 25"! ! [ ! I 1 I 81 percent passing the U.S. No. 200,Sieve.- - S-8 4 1' i ! - pAp I I ~ ; ' i j Stiff,,and medium gray to gray below 30 feet. S-9 7 30 i ._L i-LL - ! t- I,_j_ 39 _..i 4 _ 3 L - ! .(log continued on next page)' LeQend =Water Level • Moisture Content in Percent CARLSON GEOTECHN/CAL S-1 Dames & Moore Sample., S-1 Split-spoon Sample S-1 Shelby Tube Sample P. O. BOX 23814 Notes Tigard, Oregon 1. Soil interlaces and descriptions are interpretive and actual changes and transitions may be gradual. ' 2. Water level is for date shown and may vary with the time of year. Figure: 7 3. USC classifications are determined by visual-manual method. ' - EXPLORATORY BORING LOG'B-4(cont.) „ TIGARD:FIRS, T BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 021112005 Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations,, Inc. Logged By. Brad Wilcox' Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 66~20DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable TEST RESULTS SOIL DESCRIPTION a a Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot co 3 W z ti z o o 25 so , ML Stiff, medium gray to gray, SILT,with sand; Wet. ! .•;t r ; , 40 j i 85 percent passing the U.S No."200.Sieve. 0©A S-.10 9 ' Boring terminated 'at 41.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). ! Ground water was encountered at 22.5'feet bgs. Boring w,as'backfilled with granular bentonite on 2/1/2005. i 1 1 ! 4 '55 . J I t i i i 60 66 _ ,j_ - - -7-7-17 , i 0 - i - -i- - - i- - -i - Ledend : Water Level Moisture Content in Percent CARLSON GEOTECHN/CAL S-1 Dames & Moore Sample S-1 Split-spoon Sample S-1 Shelby Tube Sample P. O.' BOX 23814 Note3: - Tigard, Oregon .1. Soil interfaces and descriptions are interpretive and actual changes and transitions may be,gradual. 2. Water level is for dale shown and may vary with the time of year. . 3. USC classifications are determined by visual-manual method. . , .A, Figure. 7 (ll 0 n L,) . EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B=5 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 02/1/2005' ' . Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations,, Inc: o Logged By. Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method:. Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable v Z w w w _ TEST RESULTS SOIL DESCRIPTION a a < ii:: j w + Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot co H z h z ° 0 25 50 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE: 1.5-inch de the o GP Dense, gray, GRAVEL FILL; 4-inch,d,epth, moist. ML Stiff, brown-light gray (slightly mottled), SILT with sand; S71 10' I very moist. - S-2 . 12 5 I T- 33 S-3 8 ' t Mediumstiff; and brown `below ! 0'feet. 8-4 6 10 S-5. 5 1s Brown light gray (mottled) below. l5 feet. S-6 8 ; ' 34 Very 'soft below 20 feet. 84 percent passing the S-7' 1 2 U.S. No. 200 Sieve.. 29' Turns wet, with' ground water level measured at 21' A i ; i feet with water sounder,. conducted' upon. removal of 9~© drill stem. 6© _ Medium stiff below 25 feet. S-8 5 25 Q ..1 - - - ~Q® 30 Gray below 30 feet: S-9 ' 11 4 Boring terminated at 31.5 feet-below ground surface (bgs). Groundwater was.encountered at 21 feet bgs., Boring was backfilled with granular bentonite on 2/172005. 35 Legend Water Level . • Moisture Content in Percent CARLSON GEOTECHNICAL S-1? Dames & Moore Sample S-1 Split spoon Sample 8-1 .Shelbyjube Sample P.O.. BOX 23814 Notes:- • • - - Tigard; Oregon . 1. Soil interfaces and descriptions are interpretive and actual changes and transitions may be gradual. 2. Water level is for date shown and may vary with the time of year: - F I g U ire: I USC classifications are determined by visual-manual method. , EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B-6 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 02/1/2005. Drilled by:' GeoTech Explorations, Inc. Logged By: Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable v Z, W W W I cu TEST RESULTS SOIL DESCRIPTION x < a a w + Standard Penetration' Test, Blows per Foot N z 0 2s so ASPHALTIC CONCRETE; 1.5-inch depth. I _Lil ' ! L i I ! ! i I 1?,I-=} GP Dense, gray, GRAVEL FILL; --6-inch depth; moist. ; ML Medium stiff, brownr=li9ht mottled), SILT with ! ! ~ j ' ! ! ! gray (slightly I I L sand; very moist. S-1 8 -i LIL-L x--32 ! I 5 1 ~!i I'I II I S-2 7 A I ' ! I 31 II ! S-3 6 ! I I ! i I i l ~ I I Wet, with ground water level estimated at 10 feet. ©Q© S-4 10 4 Boring terminated at 11.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). ! ! if ! Ground water was encountered at 10 feet bgs. Boring was backfilled with granular bentonite on 2/1/2005. ! I I I ` ' I ! ! 15 1 i ! I 1 ' I 11 1! ! I ! I I 1 I ' I ! I I i! I I I ' I '20 I I I I I 1! I I ! I!! it !E( EI ! ' i I I i i t I I Iii I!I 111 I ! I?I I I 25 I i i I I - I ' i ! I ! I . ! I I I ! I ' i t I ii -'LL_ I ' I i 30 ! I i I I I I ! ' . ! 1' ! L _ I I ! I !!I 11 35 I I` i ! I I+ I --17-r--r - -t-I-^- rte-- - =Water Level Moisture Content in Percent S-1 Dames & Moore Sample S-1 Split-spoon Sample S-1 Shelby Tube Sample CARLSON GEOTECHNICAL P.O. Box 23814. Notes: Tigard, Oregon. 1. Soil interfaces and descriptions are interpretive and actual changes and transitions may be gradual. 2. Water level is for date shown and may vary vAth the time of year. 3. USC classifications are determined by visual-manual method. Figure: 9 Memorandum O PRO TO: City of Tigard GII,y~n . FROM: John D. Jensen, P.E. SUBJECT: TIGARD BAPTIST CHURCH 0R N VAI PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY/QUANTITY;, 15 14 CALCULATIONS DATE: February 14, 2005 okTE: ( 3c7 b Enclosed please find the narrative and supporting calculations addressing CWS' water quality and quantity standards for surface water management EXISTING CONDITIONS The Tigard Baptist Church project is located on the Northwest corner of the intersection of SW Gaarde Street and SW 110t" Avenue. Site elevations range from 257 feet down to 208 feet in a northwesterly direction. .A no-named tributary of Fanno-Creek crosses the western portion of the.site flowing from the South to the North. According to the Soil Conservation Service's soil survey of Washington County there are Woodburn silt loams located at the site. Woodburn silt loam soils are classified as hydrologic group 'C' with moderate erosion potential. WATER QUALITY The preliminary water quality calculations are based on the CWS design standards R&O 04-09. It is anticipated the proposed project will meet CWS' water quality standard of 65% removal of phosphorous with a combination of sumped catch basins, a water quality manhole, and a water quality Swale.. A total of approximately 86,120 square feet of new and existing impervious .surfaces will be treated in the Swale. Of this, 59;681 SF will be parking', and 26,439 SF,.will be building. The water quality Swale is located adjacent to the proposed parking lot. The bottom width wilt be 4,feet, side slopes will be 4:1 in the treatment.area. The-minimum length of the water, quality Swale will be 83 linear feet.. Total residence time will. meet, the 9-minute minimum as required by CWS. Depth of water in, the Swale during a water quality -event will be 0.25 feet. The 25- year storm, event will be conveyed in the Swale at a depth of 0.80 feet. WATER QUANTITY Subject to the City of Tigard's request, the proposed project will provide stormwater detention for the 2-year through the 25-year storm events. Two 5-foot diameter private stormwater detention pipes are proposed. The following table summarizes the proposed detention: Event Pre-development Peak Post-development Peak Detention Volume 2 yr 0.6 cfs 1.5 cfs 2470 CF 5 yr 1.0 cfs 2.1 cfs '3587, CF 10 yr 1.3 cfs .2.4 cfs 4300:CF 25 yr .1.7 cfs . 2.9 `cfs .6039' CF CESNW, Inc. CES Memorandum 'Page 2 SITE MAP ,r 2a} i it I J1_ ¢ RN N aI! pO ` % KF r 9 s i 1 '=rr ~ SW I- 12500. • ~FONNER i L=n t • C\i SW WJON •A r. T < ~j< err a oo i p ~r ti s, / ✓ del ° C1Lk n+ _ f ~ i _ f' ~ . n 4 FAlft-44YE1: 4 yam -p' . sT YL- cc? ie p~ SW E , a J 3yyb i°, ~~'\y A ~ ~sr.,a ar `i A rlL~etlE j~ S,r + SW HILLLLr7El1 sI HiLLVIEY 5w n 6AA LI, I , r Sld 3 " ar ci MCDONALD ~Iax 15 ) 9.00 tlE`~ sig. - iiA p t 4WL I a~ r;F r,ka a ..1I ? \t~ C3 PLI / ~ ~nnx P N C! L 1. i 7 I Sr . I nmL J vif n f BULL h'~~NTAIN in~ ` s~ ► MID Yl~lt - u ~ ~ d i6~Op ~ ~ ]GLY1H P ocu a ~t HnF J r 4, T T.nAl CESNW, Inc. Ct-S lations waier• Quality ' .preliminary . gapt Prolec st•Church t- T,141d 05 Date 21 imPer°VIous areas idewatks 59 Q3g sf t and S 26 Parking Building =sf total . 7f Qua ItY Storage ca e' Required Water- 3' = Requded Sta 9 ImPeN%ous Area _ 2583.6 Storage'(ofl flpW s _ W ater (luau O aseC a i. W Quality Flow (cf } X4;4 i Water cis W CAF r Project: Tigard Baptist Church CL S N V V Project Number: 1845 Date: 2/11/05. POND STORAGE-ROUTING Basin: Site Event: "2 through 25 . Pipe, Data::, Outlet Data:., Dia. 5 feet Onf1 A= 0.07.sq: ft. Broad Crested Radius = 2.5'feet. 041 E 0-' Weir1 L= 2.78 feet Length = 135 feet Dia 1' = 3.58' inches Weir1'E = 4.9 Slope 0.005 feet/feet Max Vol = 5301 Cubic Feet Orif2 A = 0.07 sq. ft.. Rectangular Height 0= " 100 Elevation Orif2 E _ 2.7.._ Weir2 L = 0 feet ' # Barrels= 2' . ` Di 'a 2 = 3.58 ` inches Weir2:E = 0 Orif3_ A= 0.08 sq. fft. MAX STOR. _ 5039 cu ft . Orif3 E 4.1 MAX OUTLET= 1.7 ds Dia'3 = 3.83" inches ' MAX HEIGHT = 4.9 feet • Pipe OdtflowOydrograph 3.5 : 1 14 I t I T ' l s t I I I I t'- I I - i t 2.0 U. V i i - - - - ' t - C 4..... 3• I i , rL 1.5 y 1 r_ i I i... 1.01- T' t : 0.5' • I i III 0.0 ` 0 200 400 - 600 800-_ 1000 1200. 1400 1600 Time in Minutes Routed Hydrograph - Inflow Hydrograph File: PIPE.XLS ' '"2/1112005 CESINW, Inc. Page 1 )J- - VVVV V W 01 Of 0I 0)o0i 0)U -U UUUU())UUU AAAAAAAAA WWWW'.WWWW W-'NN NNNNNN.N++-+++~+-+ 000000000 --~lD - O A W N+ (o U V O) U A W N+ o ID CD V D) N. A W N.-+ U O CD 4 Q7 U.A W N p tD m V T U A W.N + W O CD 4 W U A W N+ N.0 U 447 (n A W IJ iD m V O U A W N+ O (Q - m Cl) " U U U U W o C. U U U U U U U U 'U U U U U U j j U U A A A A A ~a A A j A W (A W W. W W j W-N' N N N N N N - - C - . W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N N N 0 0 (O W V Q) U A W N O (O V m U W N O-CO V O) A W N O t0 00 . U A W+ p tO W V CA (n A W N N 222223 0 0 0 0 O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO V A V W OD N U V pp pp m CO U V a A N O CO U N CD M W O m o T (d O C) W o V U N' O O D m U A W W A U O) (O N T O U N+ W N A: + W N V V- A W A co co W A+ U' OI A O A OI Q) O A+ co A -4 'D m w O W W O W ID U U to -4 + V O N (D (D + N O _ r- rri W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W,W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 'W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N O co D1 O. O CD _ U U U U U U U U U U O) U U U U U U U U U U'U U U (n 0 to U U 0n U to CD (n On U'U U (n U CD'tn'U CD (n. (n to 0 U (n (n U (n U Cn (n (n (n U U W U U U U U U 00 0 0 O O~O (Q CD - N.NNNNNNNNNNNNN N-N NNN NN NN-NNN (O'to OD co V.-V 0) 0) U;UAAW N+ +0 -~'y. 0000.00000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D CO CO (D CO CV CO V V 01 W W U W N N 0,0 0 U.A A W-W'N N++ 0 0 y . • O) cn O) O)"O) 0) 9) 0) U o p U,U U U U U U A 4'A A A U 'A A -b. A W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N+++ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W C - V O 0 A W IV + 0 0 OD V O) U is W N+ O (O'bu 4.01 6 A W N O 0 co V W U A (J N+ O.0 6 V o U A W N O'i0 OD V"01 UAW A1'_••+ o (o OD V O) N A W N O'O 6. 6 O O O O- (n O - 'N NN N N NN N N N N N'N NN N NN N - - _r (O(O CO CDV V.0)C) UU. W.twi N.NN+-+++0000000000 • O O;O O O O O O OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (O fD O IACD OD V V V D) W U U. A :9'Z: W N N+ 0 0 N rw +~~++ooooo0. . . . . 0000000000000000`0.0'0"00000000000000000;00`oooopooooo0000000 . O 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 (0 (O to to t0 io io ta to 0 W co .W W W iD CD 0 W OD m CO CO 4 V 4 V 4 4' V V 4 4 0. 0) O) 0-in b )'On in U U N (n W' Cn N Ut A 'ia A A. A A W W 'w 'W CD , - 00.0,000.00"000000000'0000-00000'00000000000000000000ooooopooooo0ooooopooooooooo'oo ~C t~A " VCD CD,WUOD OI(b4444•~14444 VOf~01U0f 01~~NU,Utn tntnN-CnAAAA A.AWia,WWNN N+0000000000 CCO0000:000O00 COOC0 Ty M m :.G 00000000000,0000'00000000000o0CD o0'00000000o0oo00.00000000000000000000000oo0oO0CD Ati Z co co V V V V 4 V V V 0) M .G) W T in in (n N N (n (n A' 4-:0. A A W W W N N+ 0 0 0 O o o 0 0 0 O O C G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.G O O O C O O O O C O O O O C O O:O 0 0 •Q ' _ ` _ _ -n - - - pa p) n' W (D V U W oCD Of U W N+ (O W 'V O) A CO N N ~ 00•o OO o 00000000000000-00000000000000 000,0.000000 O OO o0000 - 0 0 iJ A D). W+ U (O W O A 0 0 W O (0 (O'6 + A 4 W 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 i0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C O i0 i,7 o 0 0 0 0 C.0 0 6 _6. C 0 0 i0 i0 0 60'' 0 0 0 0 rn o0ooooCD o0.00'0o o00000000000000000000oooo0'ooooo00000000000000000000ooo,opooooop m - 000000000000000000000'0000000000000000.0ooo0ocoo0oocoooooo0bc0-00o0CD 0o00000.0'0o A CD W o CD OOj PO PD Pp O) OD CD R 92.p p W FD O CD O CD CD o W W o o CD U V V V V V 0) 0) 0) 0 0) U U U'U U A' A A A W W W W W N N N N N+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CDCDCDOODCOOOUCDCD COCO:UCDOCDOUCD 4 V CnoU'i W +OCDTN W +i DV U W'+tO NA N OO0)'W -+0 V A N o O W A NO'o TA K)•-(00 TU A W N+0000 w - _ V V V V V' V V V V V V V V V V V V v V V V V V Q) rn•rn U U U AA A W W W N N++ O O.O V v- d) Of p U~U A A A W W NNN O O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V V 4 V V 4 4 4 V V' V V 4.4 V V 4 4 O)-O) U A N iO co U N (D .a) W io 6-K) CD.A O'iA N m W to P 0. o m N O w w U O m N O A O m k) W (n O W N O w (n W N+ 0.0 0 0 ' to A A A PA A W W W W W W NN NNN NN K) N + + O W O V U W O W m p W N O t0 . 0) D A W N O O O CD CO V V V 0) 0) U U' U A A W W N N++ 0 0 V V V W Q7'U- U A A A W' O.O O O O O O N CD - ' N N W A 0 V (D N U 0 W V W W Cn + 0 0 A A A 0 V O U N iO 6 N CD :O- io -WO O) V"N.iD W m A'iD A tO A.o A (D N b n+ V W Co A o T W 0 U N to 0) (4 co 6)A W N O y - - W WNN NN NN++ - Q:O (nW tOVO)A NOtDVQ)AW+O~Wmcn.A A W;N N++++++-++++ +.++00'0000000000000000000000000000000 ,C„ N O) V t0O W U W'N O+U. . L,N0(D(0 (O 0",6 4 V V 66-6A 41 IJ N-+.+++ O O O iD(O ao o V 0)c)66)6 n6(n nin'N in in A A A to A A ''W' Ww NNN+O t2 M - N ~ _ - - - t0 tD.V7 tDO(p t0 (D (O O) ODOOD O)OD aD QDO V V V V V p~ - - O(Ow V 0(A W fJ ..•(D000 V Q7 tT1 A W N~ONQD V O) W - N m . - - - (71 /r "(f CI (.)1 O N lr Cn N N N O) (T V1 (A m cn N 0 N 0 N. N N - _ - W W W W W W W W W W W W WW W W W W W W W W W W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W _ - - N N N N U N N N Ir (.)1 N N V) N N N V1 (P N V) U1 W N (T N (r - NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N • - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O.O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ' 0 (D (O (O CD 00 ~ DD N CD OD O O) DD V V V V V -4.-4 V V V O M WN -~O(O CD VC)(n A W to~O'(D CD V O)(AA W N - O to CD - - ' N N-N N N N'N N N N 8 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a 00000 O O 000 O 0.00 000 O . - - O O O O O + O O O (O tD (D (O tD t0 DJ (D (O (D t0 tD (O m W W O Oo ' ~ -+000000_,00 000 00000 O - ' Z - _ _ C C OHO o O C 0 0 (D W-(O W (O (O W CO W CO OD CD OD OD CD CD OD Cl _ - Of W co NNt•VOJA+(OD COiA ~(.ND V ANO V V1'.W (WO V N, • - - N0 V 0 Wm0 AWN -l K) 0 AO C) 'W OV 6 W N-+00 - - ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O-OO O(O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 O C O O O C 0 C O.O.O C b O O O O 0 O O 0;. . O 0). PD, 90 FO P) Co Qo CDC CD DD O OD W Di CO CO OD CD CO CO CO OD OD CO' . • - , CO Co CO CO CO CD CD CO CO CO OD OD CO bO-OD CD O aD OD oD'CD aD OD CO W W ' _ - V V V V V V V V V V"V V V V VV`V VV V V V V V V V Y V V V V V V V V :-4.:-4 V V V :-4 .:,1 V V V V V V -4 N V V V N N co co A p m co -,V N N O .VOi W (NO J~ . _ F07A~CO'N W O _ tD ~..W (<!pp1 CDO A-4 0(D W W-OAS CD Ln ~CD(A N CD 'CA .4- W N - • - - - - f.00T W O~(OJ~NO V AN(OD A Nt.NOr VNiNOp CA) W+.tWD V W A C) OD A v' O A CD N v N V N CD A+ CON W (D (O V a) C) O N Pipe Storage Routing Time 11 12 2S1 " 11+12+2S1 01 02+2S2 STORAGE 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2. 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 40 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3 50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 6.1 32.0 60 0.0 0.1. 0.1 0.2 ' 0.0 0.2 62.1 70 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 80 0.1 0.1 0.0- 0.2 0.0 0.2 49.5 90 0.1 .0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 700 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.3 96.6 110 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.2. 0.0 .120 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.2 29.7 130 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.2 8.2 140 0.2 0.2 0.1 .0.4 0.1 0.3 50.3 150 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.3 38.5 160 0.2 0.2. 0.1. 0.5 0.2 0.3 48.3 170 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.5 02 0.3 36.2 160 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.4 45.0. 190 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.4 59.3 200 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.5 77.2 210 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.5 69.7 220 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.5 77.7 230 0.3 0.3 ' 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.6 96.9 240 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.2, 0.7 125.4 . 250 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.0 0.3 0.7 133.5 260 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.0 013 0.8 152.9 270 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.1 0.3 0.8 •175.3 280 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.2 0.3 0.9 185.0 290 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.10.3 1.0 2201 300 0.4 0.4 0.7' 1.5 0.3 1.2 273.2 310 0.4 0.4 0.9 1.7 0.3 1.4 316.2. 320 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.8 0.3 1.5 355.7 330 0.4 0.4 1.2' 2.0 0.3 1.7 409.3 340 0.4 0.5 1.3 2.2 0.4 1.9 458.8 350 0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 0.4 2.1 520.4 360 0.5 0.5 1.7 2.8 . 0.4 2.4 608.0 370 6.5 0.5 2.0 3.1 0.4 2.7 692.0 380 0.5 0.6 2.3 3.4 0.4 3,0 775.4 390 0.6 0.6 2.6 3.7 0.4 3.3 857.1 400 0.6 0.7 2.8 4.1 0.4 3.6 960.2 410 0.7 0.8 3.2 4.6 0.5 4.2 1117.6 420 0.8 0.8 3.7 5.3 0.5 4.9 1320.1 430 0.8 •1.0 4.4 6.2 0.5 5.7 1558.8 440 • .1.0 1.1 5.2 7.3 0.5 6.8 1882.8 450 1.1 1.6 6.2 9.0 0.5 8.4 2358.6 460 1.6 2.6 7.8 12.0 0.6 11.4 3251.2 470 2.6• 2.9 .10.5 16.1 0.9 15.1 4265.1 480 2.9, 2.2 14.0 19.1- 1.2 17.9 5034.0 490 .2.2 1.6 16.3 20.1 1.7 18.5 5038.8 . 500 1.6 1.3 16.7 19.6 1.7 17.9 - 4871.6 510. 1.3 1.2' 16.3 18.7 1.7 17.1 4627.5 526 12 1.0 15.6 17.8 1.5 16.3 4433.5 530 1.0 0.8 14.9 16.8 1.3 15.4 4221.7 , 540 0.8 0.8 14.2 15.8 1.2 14.6 4037.7 550 . 0.8 0.8 13.5 15.0 1.1 13.9 3826.9 560 0.8 0.7 12.8 14.3 1.1 13.2 3641.7 576 0.7 0.7 12.2 13.7 1.0 12.7 3491.3 580 0.7. 0.7 11.7 13.2 1.0 12:2 3352.2 590 0.7 0.8 11.2 12.7 1.0 11.7.' _ 3235.1 600 0.8 0.8 10.8 12.3 0.9 11.4 3141.8 610 0.8 0.8 10.5 12.0 0.9 11.1 3039.7 620 0.8 0.8 10.2 11.7 0.9 10.8 2974.0 630 0.8 0.8 10.0 . 11.5 0.8 10.6 2936.5 640 0.8 0.7 9.8 11.3 0.8 10.4 2875.1 650 0.7 0.7 9.6 ' . 11.0 0.8 ''.10.1 2784.3 660 0.7 , 0.6 9.3 ',10.6 0.8 9.8 . . 2713.3 670 0.6 0.6 .9.1 10.4 0.7 9.6 2673.5 680 0.6 0.6 8.9 10.2 0.7 9.4 2613.5 690 0.6 0.6 8.7 10.0' 0.7 9.2 2553.4 700 0.6 0.6. 8.6 9.9 0.6 9.3 2609.5 710 0.6 0.6 8.7 10.0. 0.6 9.4. 2627.9 720 0.6' 0.6 8.8 10.0 0.6 9.4 2647.4 730 0.6 0.6 8.7 MO 0.7 9.2 2552.3 740 0.6 • 0.6 8.6 9.9 0.6 9.3 2612.3 750 0.6 0.6 8.7 10.0. 0.6 9.4 2634.9 760 0.6 0.6 8.8 10.0 0.6 9.4 2645.7 Filei PIPEALS 2/1112005 CESINW, Inc. Page 4 N ~ O ( _ _ _ _ + + + + + + _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ m - W (JI N N N N_ N A A A A A AAA A_ A W W W W W (J W W _a (^I N N N N ( N (~n N N N N N++ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co t0 co co t0 f0' fD fD t_O f0 co p] co p] QY of pp CO Q_) OD V V V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O S w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ,Q (D 0 V T N A W N O W 0 V 0 V) W N C t0 CO V O N? W N <D Co V O (7t S W N O I OD"V O O O 000000000000 O 00 O O 00000 O O O O S O O O O O O 00 O 0000 W • - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0.0.0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0p0p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O' O O O O O O O O O A A. A A A A A A A a A A A A A a A A A A A AAA A A A A A A A? A A A A A A la A A A 1 1 V1 N Ut N ut V1 U1 N (n (J) ut N Ut (J1 (JI Ut U1 N W • O OO .O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O OO O OOO O O OA A A a A AA A a A A A A A a A AA lAA AAA A 4A A Afa A A is A A A A AA A A A F. A ANm m o o o o cp 666 cm N m Ln 6 V1 (n m Ln is6m - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O++ N N N N N N N N N!13 N NN N N N N N N N !Q N N N N-N N N N N N W W W W W W W A A A A Ot 0 N N N M UI 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V V V V V V V 0 ao Co co 0 0000000000 A Om00000000co NK)K)W WA A NI. C)L~I CJ fD O N AN V (O+fJ N,m O N A,in 6) ~.I co O N W L, V (OO+N A L, b, m fD+N A U1 V O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0++ N NNNNNNNNNNN N NNNNN N N W W W W W (A W W W W W W W A A A A A A ut W ut p 0)0)0)00)0)0 V V V V V m 000000 0 (D(D(D(D(D ' - O O O O O O O O O O A p W A W CD CD O) W CD-CD W CD W CO W CO (D (O'O (p (O O p O++ N N (J A A.'N O) ~I (D O+ W fn V W+ W (n OD O W A 0 0 CO (O - W A C) CO O N W A (A V 0 (O + k) :N 0 m - O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O.O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - O O OO O O.O 0 0 A + W W A A A A A. A A A A A A A a A A AA A A AAA A A A A A A J. A 4, A N N N Vt ut V7 N ut N ut N N W N N U(N N N C) 0 W b) W W 01 T W W W W 0 W W V '(p O O O O O-O O O O O 0 0 N!,) N N N N N N N N 'K) N N NNNNN N!- N N N N N N N NW' W W W W W W W A A A A A 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V. V V V V V -4,0 0 CO CO OD 0 CO CO CZ O O O O O O C O O O 0:W O A A A A A A A A :t, A A N (l( N 0 N N VI W W V, L4 1.4 W W tD O+ N W A in V'0'0 IV A W W O 4) D) V fD O+ N A 6 V fD + 4.) _A W V W FD + K) W 6 W OD O+ N N N N N N N N N N N A 0 0 00 0 0 0 0!pR 0 pp~~ 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V V 0 O) OD0 CO W 00++ N W A ((~n N000 j V 0 V [[yD 0 (OOO N N N W W A A N - . O 0 m O O ~D O O S O N N N W W j A (n V O N N J O N pp~~ O N V . ut N pp V I W 0 0 0 W V U t0 A 0 (n O (J) O A j O A W N 0 (n - O 0000000000 (Dm W W U)0 V DDO+W Ut V (DNA V O W L, P. W V V W 0 W?.O p V rl). pA.. . p NO W ppP W NN. W. Pp. A . V ONOO pp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W o o w W W W A ":-4 L" }a 6 07 iJ OD W 0 V P. V CO O A O 0 (D O W 0 V N CO N 0 U) + OD 0 0 W 0 W W W CD A P. CO W A (O a 0 W 0 C) N O W A 0,-4 A+ W W, " y O . V1 ' 1580 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1590 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1600 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1610 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1620 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1630 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1640 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 1650 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1660 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1670 0.0 0.0 •0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1680 0.0 0.0 0.0, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1690 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1700 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01. 0.0. 1710 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1720 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' 1730 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1740 0.0 0.0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 1750 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1760 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 1770 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0.0 1760 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1790 0.0. '0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 1800 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1810 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1620 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1830 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 1840 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 1850 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1860 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • 0.0 0.0 1870 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 1880 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1890 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1900 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1910 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1920 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1930 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1940 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1950 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1960 0.0 0.0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1970 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1980 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' 1990 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 2000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 2010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 2030 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2040 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2050 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2060 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,0.o 2070 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2080 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2090 0.0 0.0 0.0, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2100 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2110 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2120 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2130 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2140 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2150 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2160 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2170 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2180 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '2190 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2200 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2210 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2220 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2230 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 2240 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2250 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2260 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0- 0.0 0.0 2270 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 2280 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2290 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .2300. , 0.0 0.0' „0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2310 0.0 0.0'. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2320 0.0 0.0 0.0 "0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2330 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2340 0.0 0.0. 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2350 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 2360• 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2370 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2380 0.0 0.0 " 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 File: PIPEALS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc:. Page 6 2390, • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2400 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2410 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 2420 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0" 2430 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2440 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2450 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 2460 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2470 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 ' 0.0 0.0 2480 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 0.0' 2490 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2500 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2510 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 , 0.0 0.0 2520 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2530 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2540 '0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 2550 0.0 0.0 0.Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2560 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0" 0;0 2570 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 2580 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2590 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2600 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2610 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0, 0.0 0.0 2620 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2630 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 2640 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2650 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2660 0.0 0.0' 0.0 . 0.0 ` 0.0. 0.0 0.0 2670 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2680 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2690 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' 0.0 0.0 0.0' 2700 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2710 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2720 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • 0.0 0.0 2730 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 2740 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2750 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 2760 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 2770 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0. 2780 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0. 0.0 2790 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 2800 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 2810 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2820 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2830 0.0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2840 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2850 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2860 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ` 0.0 0.0 0.0 2870 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2880 0.0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 File: PIPE.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW„Inc., Pagel CES NW-. Project:. Tigard Baptist Church Project Number: 1845 SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date:. 2111105 SCS TYPE M24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Basin: Site Event: 2-year pre Given: 'Area = 4.64 acres Pt = 2.5 inches di = 10 min. Tc = 23 min. w = 0.1786 routing constant Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Area = . 4.64 acres Area = 0 acres Peak Runoff: 0.6 cfs ' CN = 79 CN ' = 98 Total Vol.: 13847 cf S = 2.66 S = 0.20 0.2S = 0.53 0.2S = • 0.04 Peak Runoff Hydrograph 0.6 t 1 0.5 i , , ~I t 0.4 t , , I i I ' t 0.3 ; i. i I • o 1. t. .t... _ _ ` - 111 ; i 0.1 - - - - I I ( I 0.0 0 '200 400 600 800 1000 1200,' 1400 1600 Time in Minutes File: SBUH-24-pre2.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 1 Pervious Area Impervious Area (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) ' (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12). Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- . Distri- mental fated lated mental. fated' mental Runoff Hydro- Hydra ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff. _ graph' graph (Min) of Pt) (in)' (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs ' 1 10 0.0040 0.0100 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0100 0.0200 0.0000 0.0060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 6.0100 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 ?4 40 0.0040,. 0.0100 0.0400 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0100 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0004 0.0000` 0.0 0.0 6 60. 0.0040' 0.0100 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 0.0016'. . _ 0.0013 0:0000 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0100• 0.0700 0.0000 0.0000 0.0037 0.0020 •0.0000 0.0 0.0 8, 86 0.0040 0.0100 0.0800 00000 0.0000 0.0063 0.0027 0.0000: 0.0 0.0 9' 90 0.0040 0.0100 0.0900 0.0000 0.0000 0.0096 0.0032 0.0000 0.0 0.0 16' 100 0.0040 0.0100:' 6.1000 0.0000 0.0000 ..0.0133 0.0038 . 0.0000 0.0 0.0 11 110 0.0050 0.0125 0.1;125 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0186 0.0053 0.0000 0.0 0.0 12 120 0.0056 0.0125 0.1250 0.0000 0.0000 0.0246 0.0060 0.0000 0.0 0.0 • 13 ,130 0.0050 0.0125 0.1375 0.0000 010000 0.0311 0.0065 0.0000 0.0 0.0 14 -140 0.0050 0.0125 0.1500 , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0381 0.0070 0.0000 0.0 0.0 15 150 0.0050 0.0125 0.1625 0.0000. 0.0000 .0:0455 0.0074 0.0000 0.0 0.0 16 160 0.0050 0.0125 0.1750 0.0000. 0.0000 0.0532 0.0078 0.0000 0.0 0.0, 17' 170 0.0060 0.0150 0.1900 0.0000 0.0000., 0.0630 0.0098 0.0000 0.0 0.0 18 180 0.0060 0.0150 -0.2050 - 0.0000 0,6000' 0.0732 0.0102 0.0000'.. 0.0 0.0 19 190 0.0060 0.0150 0.2200 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0838 0.0106 0.0000 0.0 0.0 20 260 0.0060 - 0.0150 0.2350 0.0000 -0.0000 0.0947 0.0109 0.0000 0.0 0.01 21 210 0.0060 0.0150 • 0.2500 0:0000 0.0000 0.1059 0.0112 0.0000 0.0 0.0 22 220 0.0060 0.0150 ' 0.2650 0.0000. 0.0000 • 0.1174 0.0115 0.0000 0.0 0.0 23 230 0.0070 0.0175 0.2825 0.0000 0.0000 0.1310 0.0137 0.0000 0.0 0.0 24 240 0.0070 0.0175 0.3000' 0.0000 0.0000 " 0.1450 0.0140 0.0000 0.0 0.0 25 250 0:0070 0.0175 0.3175 0.0000 0.0000 0.1592 0.0142 0.0000 0.0 0.0 26 260 .0.0070 0.0175 0.3350 0.0600 0.0000 0:1737 0.0145 0.0000 0.0 0.0 27 270 0.0070 0.0175 0.3525 0.0000 0.0000 0.1884 0.0147 0.0000 0.0 0.0 28 280, 0.0070 0.0175 073700 0.0000 0.0000 0.2032 0.0148 0.0000 0.0 0.0 29 290 0.0082 0.0205 0.3905 0.0000 0.0000 0.2208 070176. 0.0000 0.0 0.0 30 - 300 0.0082 0.0205 0.4110 0.0000 0.0000 0.2386 0.0178 - -0.0000 0.0 0.0 31, 310 0.0082 0.0205• 0.4315 0.0000 ' •0.0000' 0.2566 0.0180 0.0000 0.0 0.0 32, 320 0.0082. 0.0205 0.4520 0.0000 0.0000 0.2748 070182 0.0000 0.0 0.0 33 330 0.6082 0:0205 0.4725 , 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.2931 0.0183 0:0000 0.0 0.0 34 340 0.0082 0.0205 0.4930, 0.0000 0.0000. 0.3116 . 0.0185 0.0000 0.0. ' 0.0 35 350 0.0695 0.0238 0.5168 0.0000 0.0000 '0.3331. 0.0215 0.0000 0.0 0.0 _ .36 360 0.0095 0.0238' . 0.5405 '0.0000 0.0000 0.3548 0.0217 0.0000 0.0 0.0 37. 370 0.0095 0.0238 0.5643 0.0004 0.0004 0.3766, 0.0218 0.0004 0.0 0.0 38 380 0:0095 0.0238: 0.5880 0.0012 ' 0.6008 0.3985 0.0219. 0.0008 0.0 0.0 39 390 0.0095 070238 0.6118 0.0023 0.0012 0.4206 0.0221 0.0012 0.0 0.0 40, 400. 0.0095 0.0238 0.6355 0.0039 0.0016 0.4427 0.0222 0.0016 0.0 0.0 41 410 0.0134 0:0335 0.6690 0.0067 0.0028 0.4741 0.0314 0.0028. 0.1 0.0 42 420 0.0134 , 0.0335 0.7025 0.0103 ..0.0036 0.5057 0.0316 0.0036 0.1 0.1 43 430 0.0134 0.0335 0.7360 0.0146 0.0043 0.5374 0.0317 0.0043 0.1 0 44 440 , 0.0180 0.0450 0.7810 0.0214 0.0068 0.5802 0.0428,. 0;0068 .0.2 0.1 45 450 0.0180 0.0450 0.8260: 0.0293 0.0080 0.6232 0.0430 ' 0.0080 0.2, 0.1 46 460 0.0340 0.0850 0.9110 0.0474 _ 0.0180 0.7049 0.0817 0.0180 0.5 0.2 47 470 0.0540 0.1350 1.0460 0.0834 0.0360 0.8355 0.1307 0.0360 1.0 0.4 '48 480 0.0270 0.0675 1.1135 '0.1045 0.0211 0.9012 0.0657 0.0211 0.6 0.6 49 490 0.0180 0.0450 1.1585 0.1196 0.0151 0.9451 0.0439 0.0151 0.4 0.5 50 500 0.0134 0.0335 1.1920 0.1314 0.0118 0.9778 0.0327 0.0118 0.3 0.5 51 510 .:0.0134 0.0335 1.2255 0.1436 0.0122 -1.0106 0.0328 0.0122 0.3 0.4 52 520 0.0134 0.0335' .1.2590 0.1563 0.0126 1.0434 0.0328 0.0126 .0.4 0.4 53 530, 0.0088 0.0220 1.2810 0.1648 _ 0.0085 1,0649 0.0216 0.0085 0.2 0.4 54 . ' 540 0.0088 0.0220 1.3030. 0.1735 0.0087 1.0865 0.0216 0.0087 0.2 0.3 55 550' 0.0088 0.0220' 1.3250 0.1824 0.0089 1.1081 0.0216 0.0089 0.2 0.3 56 560 0.0088 0.0220 1.3470 0.1914 '0.0090 1.1297 0.0216 0.0090 0.3 0.3 57 570 ' . 0.0088 0.0220 1.3690 0.2006 .0:0092. 1.1513 0.0216 0.0092. 0.3 0.3 58 580 0.0088 0.0220 1.3910 , 0.2099 0.0094. ° 1.1729 0.0216 0.0094 0.3 0.3'. 59 590 0.0088 0.0220 1.4130. 0.2195 ' 0.0095 1.1945 0.0216 0.0095 0.3 0.3 60 600: 0.0088' • ' 0.0220 1.4350. 0.2291 0.0097 1.2162 0.0216 0.0097 0.3 0.3 61 610 0.0088 0.0220 • . 1.4570 .0.2389 .0.0098 1.2378 0.0216 0.0098 0.3 0.3 62 620 0.0088 0.0220 1.4790 0.2489 0.0100 _ 1.2595 0.0217 0.0100 0.3 0.3 - 63 630 0.0088 0.0220 1.5010 ;0.2590 •0.0101 4.2811 0.0217 0.0101 0.3 0.3 64 ' 640 0.0088 0.0220 1.5230 0.2693 0:0103 1.3028 0.0217 0.0103 0.3 0.3 65 650 0.0072 0.0180 1.5410 '0.2778 0.0085 1.3205, 0.0177 0.0085 0.2 0:3 66 660 0.0072 0.0180 1.5590 0.2864 0.0086 1.3383' 0.0177 0.0086 0.2 0:3 67 670 0.0072 0.0160 1.5770 0.2951 0.0087 1.3560 0.0177 0.0087 0.2 0.3 68 680 0.0072 0.0180 1.5950 0.3038 0.0088 1.3738 0.0178 0.0088 0.2 0.3 69 696 0.0072 0.0180 1.6130 0.3127 0.0089 1.3915 0.0178 0.0089 0.2 0.2 70 700 0.0072 0.0180- 1.6310 0.3216 0.0089 1.4093 0.0178 0.0089 0.3 0.2 71 710 0.0072 0.0180 1.6490 0.3307 0.0090 •1.4271 0.0178 0.0090 0.3 0.3 File: SBUH-24-pre2.XLS 2/11/2005' CESINW, Inc. • Page 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)' (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated fated mental lated ' mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) (%'of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (CIS) 72 720 0.0072 0.0180 1.6670 0.3398 07-091 1.4449 0.0178 0.0091 0.3 0.3 73 730 0.0072 0.0180 1.6850 03490 0.0092 1.4626 0-0178 0.0092 0.3 0.3 74 740 0.0072 0.0180 1.7030 0.3583 0.0093 1.4804 0.0178 0.0093 0.3 0.3 75 750 0.0072 0.0180 1.7210 0.3677 0.0094 1.4982 0.0178 0.0094 0.3 0.3 76 760 0.0072 0.0180 1.7390 0.3771 6.0094 1.5160 0.0178 0.0094 0.3 0.3 77 770 0.0057 0.0143 1.7533 0.3846 0.0075 1.5301 0.0141 0.0075 0.2 0:3 78 780 0.0057 0.0143 1.7675 0.3922 '0.0076 1.5442 0.0141 0.0076 0.2 '0.2 79 790 0.0057 0.0143 1.7818 0.3999 0.0076 1.5583 _ 0.0141 0.0076 0.2 0.2 80 800 0.0057 0.0143 1.7960 0.4075 0:0077. 1.5724 0.0141 0.0077. 0.2 0.2 81 810 0.0057 0.0143 1.8103 0.4153 0.0077 1.5865 0.0141 0.0077 0.2 0.2 82 820 0.0057 0.0143 1.8245 0.4230 0.0078 1.6006 0.0141 0.0078 0.2 0.2 83 830 0.0057 0.0143 1.8388 0.4309 0.0078, 1,6147 0,0141 0.0078 0.2 0.2 84 840 0.0057 0.0143 1.8530 0.4387 0.0079: 1.6288 0.0141. 0.0079 0.2 0.2 85 850 0.0057 0.0143 1.8673 0.4466 0.0079 1.6429 0.0141 0.0079 0.2 0.2 86 860 0.0057 0.0143 1.8815 0.4546 •0.0080 1.6570 6.0141 0.0080 0.2 0.2 87 870 6.0057 0.0143 1.8958 0.4626 0.0080 1,6711 0.0141 0.0080 0.2 0.2 86 880 0.0057. 0.0143 1.9100 0.4707 0.0080 1-6852 0.0141 0.0080 0.2 01 89 890 0.0050 0.0125 1.9225 0.4778 0.0071 1.6976 0.0124 0.0071 0.2 0.2 90 900 0.0050 0-0125. 1-9350 0.4849 0:0071 .1-7100 0.0124, 0.0071 0.2 0.2 91 910 0.0050 0.0125 1.9475 0.4920 0.0072 1.7223 0.0124. 0-0072 0.2 0.2 92 •920 0.0050. 0.0125 1.9600' 0.4992 0.0672 1-7347 0,0124 0.0072 0.2 0.2 93 930 0.0050 0.0125 1.9725 0.5065 0.0072 1-7471 0.0124 0.0072 0.2 0.2 94 940 0.0050 0.0125 1.9850. 0.5137 0.0073 1.7595' . 0.0124 0.0073 0.2 0.2 95 950 0.0050 0.0125 1.9975 0.5210 0:0073 , 1.7719 0.0124 .0.0073 0.2 0.2 96 960 0.0050 0.0125 2-0100 0.5283. 0.0073 13843 0.0124 0.0073 0.2 0.2 97 . 970 0.0050 0.0125 2.0225 0.5357 0.0074 1.7967 0.0124, 0.0074 0.2 0.2 98 980 0.0050 0.0125 2.0350 0.5431. 0.0074 1.8090 0.0124. 0.0074 0.2 0.2, 99 990 0.0050 0.0125 2.0475 0.5505 0.0074 118214. '0.0124 0.0074 0.2 0.2 '100 1,000 0.0050 0.0125 2.0600 0.5579• 0.0074 1.8338; OV24 0.0074 0.2 0.2 101 1010 0.0040 0.0100 2.0700 0.5639 0.0060 1.8438 0.0099 0.0060. 0.2 0.2 102 1020 0.0040 0.0100 2.0800 6.5699 00060 ,1.8537 0.0099 0.0060 0.2 0.2 103 1030 0.0040 0-0100 2.0900 0:5759 0.0060 1-8636 0-0099 0.0060 0.2 6.2 104 1040 0.0040 0.0100 21000 • 0.5820 . ' 0.0060, 1.8735 0.0099 0.0060 0.2 0-2 105 1050 0.0040 0.0100 2.1100 0.5880 0.0061 1.8834 0-0099 0.0061 0.2 0.2 106 1060 0.0040 0.0100 2-1200 0.5941• 0.0061 1.8933" 0.0099 0.0061 0.2 0.2 107 1070 0.0040 0.0100 2.1300 0.6002 0,0061 1.9033 0.0099 0.0061 0.2 0.2 108 1080 0.0040 0.0100 2.1400 0.6063 ' 0-0061' 1.9132 0.0099' 0.0061 0.2 0.2 109 1090 0.0040 0.0100 21500 0.6124 0.0061 1.9231 0.0099 ' 0.0061 0.2 0.2 ' 110 1100 0.0040 0.0100 2.1600 0.6186 "0.006i 1.9330 `0.0099' 0.0061 0.2 0.2 111 1110 0.0040 .0.0100 2.1700 0.6247 0.0062 1.9430 0.0099 6.0062 0.2 0.2 112 1120 0.0040 0.0100 2.1800 0.6309 0.0062. 1.9529 0.0099 0-0062 0.2 0.2. 113 1130 0.0040 0.0100 2.1900 0.6371 0.0062 1.9628 0.0099 0.0062 0.2 0.2 114 1140 0.0040 0.0100 2.2000 0.6433 0.0062 1.9727 0.0099 0.0062 0.2 0.2 115 1150 6.0040 0.0100 2.2100 0.6496 0.0062 1.9827 0.0099 0.0062 0.2 0.2 116 1160 0.0040 0.0100 2.2200 0.6558 0.0063 1.9926 0.0099 0.0063 0.2 0.2 117 1170 0.0040 0.0100 • 2.2300 0.6621 0.0063 2.0025 0.0099 0.0063 0.2 0.2 118 1180 0.0040 0.0100 2.2400 0.6684 0.0063 ' 2.0124 0.0099 0.0063 0.2 0.2 119 1190' 0.0040 0.0100 2.2500 0.6747 0.0063 2:0224 6.0099 0.0063 0.2 0.2 120 1200 0.0040 0.0100 2.2600 0.6810 0.0063 2.0323 0.0099 0.0063 0.2 '0.2 121 1210 0.0040 0.0100 2.2700 0.6873 0.0063 2.0422 0.0099 0.0063 0.2 0.2 122 1220 0.0040 • 0.0100 2.2800• 0.6937 0.0064 2.0521 0.0099 0.0064 0-2 0.2 123 1230 0.0040 0.0100 2.2900 0:7000 0.0064 2.0621 0.0099. 0.0064 0.2 0.2 124 . 1240 0.0040 0.0100. 2.3000 0.7064 0.0064 2.0720 0.0099 0-0064 0.2 0.2 125 1250 0.0040 0.0100 2.3100 0.7128 0.0064 2.0819 0.0099 0.0064 0.2 0.2 126 1260 0.0040 0.0100 2.3200 0.7193 0.0064 2,0919 0.0099 0.0064 0.2 0.2 127 1270 0.0040 0.0100 2.3300 0.7257 0.0064 2.1018 0.0099 0.0064 0.2 .'0:2 128 1280 0.0040 0.0100 2.3400 0.7321 ' 0.0065 2.1117 „ 0.0099. 0.0065 0.2 0.2 ' 129 - 1290 0.0040 0.0100 2.3500 0.7386 0.0065 2.1217 ' 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 0.2 130 1300 0.0040 0.0100 2.3600 0.7451 F 0.0065: 2.1316 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 0.2, 131 1310 0.0040 0.0100 2.3700 0516 0.0065 2:1415 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 A.2. 132 .1320 0.0040 0.0100 2.3800 03581 0.0065 2:1515 0.0099 0.0065 0:2 0.2 133 1330 0.0040 0.0100 2.3900 0.7646 0.0065. 2.1614 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 0.2 , 134 1340 0.0040 0.0100 2.4000 0.7712 0.0065 .2.1714 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 0.2 135 1350 0.0040 0.0100 2.4100 0.7777 0.0066 - 2:1813,; -0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 136 1360 0.0040 '0.0100 2.4200 0.7843 0.0066 2:1912 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 ' 137 1370 0.0040 0.0100 2.4300 0.7909 0.0066 ' 2.2012 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 138 1380 0.0040 0.0100 2.4400 0.7975 0.0066. 2.2111. 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 139 1390 0.0040 0.0100 2.4500 0.8041 -0.0666 2.2210 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 140 1400 0.0040 0.0100 2.4600 0.8107 0.0066: 2.2310 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 141 1410 0.0040 0.0100 2.4700 0.8174 0.0066 2.2409 0.0099 , 0.0066 0.2. 0.2 142 1420 0.0040 0.0100 2.4800 •0.8241 0.0067 2.2509 0.0099 0.0067 0.2 0.2 143 1430 0.0040' 0.0100 2.4900 0.8307 0.0067 2.2608 0.0099 0.0067 0.2 0,2 144 1440 0.0040 0.0100' 2.5000 0.8374 0,0067 2.2707 0.0099 0.0067 0.2 0.2 ' Total • 1.0000 2.5000 Hydrograph Volume ' 13847 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-pre2.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc: Page 3 Project: Tigard Baptist Church C r L S,,NW Project Number:• 1845 SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 2/11/05 SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION, Basin: Site Event: 5-year pre. Given: . Area = 4.64 acres' Pt = 3.1 inches dt = 10 min.. Tc = 21 min. w = 0.1923 routing constant ' Pervious Area • Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Area = 4.64 acres Area = 0 acres' Peak Runoff: 1.0 cfs' CN = 79 'CN = 98 Total Vol.: ' 20934 cf S = . 2.66 'S = 0.20 0.2S 0.53. 6.2S = . 0.04 Peak Runoff Hydrogr -h. 1.2 • . , L.. 1.0 r - - - - - - 7' T I i I .7 A t I ! t i I . _ i 0.8 ( I. Cl) , i ILL T . ! L c 0.6 3 I t o t t ll t.- I i ! , t ' 0.4 I , i I f._. I 0.0 .0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 ` 1600 Time in Minutes File: SBUH-24-pre5.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW,,Inc. Page 1 Pervious Area Impervious Area (1)' (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre Distri- mental lated ,,fated mental lated , mental Runoff„ Hydro- Hydro- ment bution, Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in), (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0124 • 0.0248 0.0000 0.0000 • .0.0000 0.0000 0.0000'' 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0124 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0124 0.0496 0.0000 -0.0000 0.0004 0.0004 0.0000 0.0 0.0 . 5 50 0.0040 0.0124 0.0620 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0020, 0.0016 0.0000 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0124 0.0144 'b.0000 0.0000 0.0047 _ 0.0028- 0.0000• 0.0 0.0 7 •70 0.0040 0.0124 0.0868 0.0000 0.0000 0.0085 0.0037 0.0000 0.0. 0.0 8 80 0.0040 0.0124 0.0992 0:0000 0:0000 0.0130 0.0045 0.0000. 0.0 0.6. 9 90 0.0040 0.0124 0.1116" 0.0000, 0.0000 0.0182 0.0052 0.0000 '0.0 0.0 10 100 0.0040 0.0124 .0.1240 ''.0.0000 0.0000 0.0241 0.0059 0.0000 0.0 0.0 11 110 0.0050 0.0155 - 0.1395 0.0000 0.0000• 0.0322. 0.0081 0.0000 0.0 0.0 12 120 0.0050. 0.0155 0.1550 '-0.0000 0.0000 0.0410 0.0088 0.0000 .0.0 0.0 13 130 0.0050 0.0155 0.1705 6.0000 0.0000 0.0504 0.0094 0.0000''. 0.0 0.0 14 140 0.0050 •0.0155 0.1860 0.0000 0.0000 0.0604 0.0100 0.0000 0:0 0.0 15 150 0.0050• '0.0155 0.2015 0.0000 0.0000 .0.0708 0.0104. 0.0000 0.0 0.0 16 166 0.0050 0.0155 0.2170 0.0000 0.0000 , • 0.0816 0.0108 0.0000 0.0 0.0 17 170 0.0060 0.0186 0.2356 0.0000 0.0000 0.0951 '0.0135 0.0000 0.0 0.0. 18' . 180. 0.0060 0.0186 0.2542 0.0000 0.0000 0.1091 0.0139 0.0000. 0.0 ' 0.0 19 190, 0.0060 0.0186 0.2728 0.0000 ^ 0.0000 0.1234 , 0.0143 0.0000 0.0 0.0 20, '200 0.0060 0.0186 0.2914 0.0000 0.0000 0.1381 0.0147 0.0000. 0.0 0.0 21 210 0.0060 -0.0186 , 0.3100 0.0000 .0.0000 • 0.1531 0.0150 0.0000 0.0 • 0.0 22 220 0.0060 0.0186 0.3286 60666 •0.0000 0.1684 0.0153 0.0000 0.0 • 0.0 23 230 0.0070 0.0217 0.3503 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.1865 0.0181 0.0000 0.0 0.0 24 240 0.0070 0.0217 0.3720 0.0000 0.0000: 0.2049 0.0184'.' 0.0000 0.0. 0.0 , . ' 25 250 0.0070 0.0217 . 0.3937 0.0000 0.0000 0:2236 0.0187 0.0000 , 0.0 '0.0 26 t 260. 0.0070 0.0217 0.4154 0.0000 0.0000 0.2425 0.0189 0.0000 0.0 0.0 27 270 0.0070 0.0217 0.4371 0.0000 0.0000 0.2616 0.0191 0.0000 0.0 „ 0.0, 28 280. 0.0070 0.0217, 0.4588 0.0006 0.0000' 0.2809 0.0193 0.0000 0.0 0.0 ' 29 290 0.0082 0.0254 0.4842- 0.0000 0.0000 0.3636 0.0228',„ 0.0006 0.0 0.0 30 300 ' 0.0082 0.0254 0.5096 0.0000 0.0000 0.3266 • 0.0230. 0.0060 0.0 0.0 - 31 310 0.0082 0.0254 0.5351 0.0000 0.0000' 6.3498 '0.0232 0:0000 0.0 0.0 32 320 0.0082 . 0.6254' 0.5605 0.0003 0.0003._ " 0.3731 0.0233 0.0003: 0.0 0.0 " 33 330 0.0082 0.0254 - ' '0.5859 6.0011 0.0008 0.3966 0.0235 0.0008, 0.0 0.0 ' 34 340 0.0082 0.0254 0.6113 0.0023 - 6.0012 0.4202 : ,6.0236 0.0012 0.0 0.0 35 350 0.0095 0.0295 0.6408 0.0043 0.0020 0.4477 0.0275 0.0020 0.1 0.0 36 360 0.0095 0.0295 0.6702 0.0069 0.0026 0.4753 '0.0276 0.0026 0.1 0.0 • 37 370 ' 0.0095 0.0295. 0.6997 - 0.0100 0.0031 0.5030 0.0277 0.0031 0.1 0.1 38 380 0.0095 0.0295 ,0.7291' 0.0137 0.0037 0.5309 0.0279 0.0037. 0.1 39 390 0.0095. 0.0295 0:7586 0.0178 0.0042 0.5589 0.0280 0.0042 "•_0.1 0.1 , 40 400 0.0095 0.0295, 0.7880 0.0226 0.0047 0.5869 0.0281 0.0047 '0.1 0.1 41 410`' 0.0134 0.0415 0.8296. 0.0300 0.0075 0.6266 ,0.0397- 0.0075 0.2 6.1 42 420 0.0134 ` 0.0415. 0.8711 0.0384 0.0084 0.6665 0.0399 '0.0084. 0.2 0.2' 43 430 0.0134 0.0415 0.9126 0.0478 0.0093 01065. _ 0.0400 0.0093' 0.3 0.2 44 440 0.0180 0:0558 ' 0.9684 0.0616 0.0139 :0.7603 0.0539 0.0139 - 0.4 0.2 45. ' 450 b.0180, 0.0558 1.0242 0.0770 . • 0.0154 0.8144 0.0541. 0.0154 0.4 0.3 46 460 0.0340 0.1054 1.1296 0:1098 .0.0328 0.9170 0.1025 0.0328 0.9 0.5. 47 470 0.0540 0.1674- 1.2970' 0.1711• 0.0613 1.0807 0.1637 0.0613 1.7 0.8' 48 460 0.0270 0.0837 1.3807 0.2056 0.0344 _ 1.1628 0.0822 0.0344 1.0 1.0 49 490 y 0.0180 0.0558 1.4365 ' 0.2298 0.0242 1.2177 A.0549 ' 0.0242 0.7 0.9 50 500 0.0134 '0.0415. 1.4781 0.2485. 0.0187 • 1.2586 0.0409 0.0187' .0.5 0.8 51 510 0.0134 0.0415 1.5196 '.'-O.2677 0.0192 1.2995*' 0.0409 0.0192 0.5 0.7 52 520, 0.0134 0.0415 1.5612 0.2874 0.0197 1.3404 0.0409 0.0197 0.6 . 0.6 53 ,530 0.0088 0.0273 1.5884 0.3006 0.0132 1.3673. 070269' 0.0132 0.4 54 540 0.6088 6.0273 1.6157 0,3140 0.0134 1.3442 0.6269 0.0134 0.4' 0.5 55 550 0.0088 0.0273. 1.6430 0.3277 0.0136 1.4212 0:0269 0.0136 0.4 0.5 56 560 0.0088 0.0273 1.6703 0.3415 0.0138 1.4481 0.0269 0.0138' ` 0.4 0.4 57 570 0.0088 0.0273 1.6976 0.3555 0.0140 1.4756 0.0269 0.0140: 0.4 .0.4 58 - 580 0.0088 0.0273 . ' 1.7248 0.3697 0.0142 1.5020 0.0270 ' 0.0142 ` 0.4 ` 0.4 ' 59 590' 0.0088 0.0273 1.7521 0.3840 , 0.0144 1.5290, 0.0270 0.0144 0.4 0.4 60 600 0.0088 0.0273 1.7794 0.3986 0.0146 .1..5559. 0.0270 0.0146 0.4 0.4, 61 610 •0.0088 0.0273 1.8067 0.4133 0.0147 '1.5829 0.0270. 0.0147 '0.4 • 0.4 .62 620 0.0088 0.0273 1.8340 0.4282 ' 0.0149 ; 1.6099 j 0.0270 0.0149. . 0.4 0.4 63 630 0.0088 0.0273 1.8612 '0.4433 0.0151. 1.6369 '0.0270 0.0151 0.4 0.4 64 640 0.0088 0.0273 1.8885 0.4585 0.0152 • 1.6639 0.0270 0.0152 0.4 0.4 65 650 0.0072 0.0223 1.9108 0.4711 0.0126 .1.6860 0.0221 0.0126 0.4 0.4 .66' 660 0.6072 0.0223 1.9332 0.4838 0.0127 1.7081 ,0.0221 • 0.0127 0.4 6.4 67 670 0.0072 0.0223 1.9555 0.4966 - .0.0128 1.7302 0.0221 0.0128 .0.4 0.4 68 680 0.0072 0.0223 1.97780.5095 0.0129. 1.7524 ''0.0221 0.0129 0.4 0.4 69 690 0.0072 0.0223 2.0001 0.5226 0.0130 1.7745- ' 0.0221• 0.0130 0.4 0.4' 70 700 0.0072 0.0223 - 2.0224 0.5357 0.0131, 1.7966 0.0221 0.0131 0.4 0.4 71 710 0.0072 0.0223 2.0448 '0.5489 0.0132 1.8187' 0.0221, 0.0132 0.4 0.4 File: SBUH-24-pre5.XLS ` 2/11/2005 '-QESjNW,1ric. Page 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (6) (9) .(10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre Accumu- " Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total _ Instant Design' •Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff ' Hydro- Hydro- ment bution ' Rainfall Rainfall- Runoff ' Runoff Runoff -Runoff, graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) .(in) (in) (in) (in) (Cs) (ofs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0223 2.0671 0.5622. ' 0.0133 1.8409 _ 0.0221. 0.0133 0.4 0.4 73 730- 0.0072' 0.0223 2.0894 0.5756 0.0134 1.8630 " 0.0221 0.0134 0.4 ' 0.4 ' 74 740 0.0072 0.0223 2.1117... 0.5891. 0.0135 1.8851 0.0221 0.0135 0.4 04 75 750 0.0072 0.0223 2.1340 0.6027 0.0136 1.9073 0.0221 0.0136 0.4 0.4 76 760 0.0072 0.0223 2.1564 0.6163 0.0137 1.9294 0.0221 0.0137 0.4 0.4 77 770 0.0057 0.0177 2.1740 A0.6272 0.0109 1.9470 0.0175 0.0109 0.3 0.4 ' 78 780 0.0057 0-0177 219117 0.6382 0.0109 1.9645 0.0175,.. 0.0109 0.3 03 79 . 790 0.0057 , 0.0177 2.2094 0.6492 0.0110 1.9820 0.0175' 0.0110 0.3 0.3 80 600' , 0.0057' 0.0177 _ 2.2270' 0.6602 • •0:0111 1.9996 0.0175 0.011.1 0.3 0.3 81, 810 0.0057 0.0177 2.2447. 4 0.6713 0.0111 270171• 0.0175 0.0111 0.3 0.3 82 820 0.0057 0.0177 2-2624 0.6825. 0.0112 2.0347 . 0.0175: 0.0112 0.3 .•0.3 83 830 0.0057 0.0177 2.2801. 0.6937 ; 0.0112 2.0522 0:0175 0.0112 0.3 0.3' " 84 840 0.0057 0.0177 2.2977, 0.7050' 0.0113 2.0697, 0.0175 0.0113 0.3 0.3 85 850 0.0057 0.0177 2.3154 0.7163 10.0113' • 2.0873 0.0175. 0.0113 0.3 0.3 86 860 0.0057 0.0177 23331 , 0.7277' '0.0114;' 2.1048' '0.0176 0.0114 0.3 0.3. 87 870' 0.0057 0.0177 2.3507 0.7391 0.0114 2.1224., 0.0176. 0.0114 6.3 0.3 88 '880 ' 0.0057 0.0177 2.3684 0.7505 0-0115 2.1400, 0.0176. ' 0.0115 0.3 '0.3 , 89 890 0.0050 0.0155 2.3839 0.7606. 0.0101 •2.1554 0.0154 0.0101 0:3 0.3 , 90 900• 0.0050 0.0155. 2.3994 0.7708. 0.0101 2.1706 0.0154 0.0101 03 0.3. 91, 910 0.0050 0.0155 2.4149 ' 0.7809 ' 0.0102' . 2.1862 0.0154 0.0102 0.3 0.3 92 '920 0.0050 0.0155 2.4304 0.7912 0.0102 2.2016 0,0154 0-0102 0.3 0.3•'' 93 930 0.0050 0.0155 2.4459 0.8014 0.0102 2.2170 0.0154 • 0.0102 0.3 0.3" 04 940 0.0050, '0.0155 2:4614 0.8117 0.0103 2.2324 0.0154 0.0103•, 0.3 . 0.3 95 950 0.0050 , '0.0155 2-4769 0.8220 6.0103 2.2478 0,0154 0.0103 0.3 0.3 96 960. 0.0050 0.0155 2.4924 0.8323 .0.0103 2.2632 ' 0.0154; 0.0103 .0.3 0.3 ' 97 970 0.0050 0.0155• = 2.5079 '0.8427 0:0104 2.2786 " 0.0154 0.0104„ ' 0.3 0.3- . 98 ' 980 0.0050• 0.0155 .2.5234 0.8531 " 0.0104 2:2940. 0.0154 0.0104 '03. 0.3 99, 990 0,0050 0.0155 . R 2.5389 0.8636 0.0105 2.3094 0.0154 0-0105 0.3 ' 0-3 ` 100 '1600 0.0050 0.0155 2.5544 0.8741 0.0105 2.3248 0.0154 0.0105 0.3 0:3 101 1010 0.0040 0.0124. 2.5668 0.8825 0.0084 2.3372 .0.0123 00084 0.2 0.3' 102 1020 0.0040 0.0124 2.5792 0.8909 0.0084 2.3495 0.0123 ' 0.0084. 0.2 0.3. 103 • 1030 0.0040 0.0124 2.5916 0.8994 0.0085 2.3618 0.0123 • 0.0085 0.2 0.3 104 1040. 0.0046 0.0124 2.6040 0.9078 0.0085 2.3742. :0.0123' 0.0085 0.2 6.2 105 •1050 0.0040' 0.0124 2.6164 0.9163 0.0085 23865, . 0.0123 0.0085 0.2 • 0.2 106 1060,." 0.0040 0-0124 2.6288 0.9249" 0.0085 2:3988 0-0123 0.0085 0.2 0.2 107 1070 0.0040. 0.0124 . 2.6412 ' 0.9334 0-0085 2.4112` 0.0123 0.0085 0.2 0.2, ' 108 1080 . 0.0040 0.0124 .2.6536 ,,0.9419 0.0086 ' 2.4235 0.0123. 0.0086• 0.2 ' 0.2 109 1090 ''0.0040: 0.0124 2.6660 0.9505,' 0.0086' 2.4358 0.0123 0.0086 •0.2•: 0.2 110 .1100 0.0046 0.0124. 2.6784 0.9591 • 0.0686 2.4482 0.0123. 0.0086 0.2 0.2 \ 111 1110 . 0.0040 0.0124 2.6908,,'. 0.9677 0.0086 2.4605 ' 0.0123 0.0086 0.2 0.2 112 1120; 0.0640 0-0124 2.7032' - -09764 0.0086 2:4728 ,0.0123 0.0086 0.2 , 0.2 113 1130 6.0040 , 0.0124 2.7156 0.9850- 0.0087 2.4852 0.0123 0.0087 0.2 0.2: 114 1140 0.0040 0.0124 2.7280 0.9937 0.0087• 2.4975 0.0123 0.0087 0.2 0.2 115 1150 0.0040 0.0124 2.7404 1.0024 0.0087 -2.5098 ."0.0123 0.0087' 0.2 0.2 116 1160 0.0040 0.0124 2.7528 1.0111 0.0087 2.5222- 0.0123 0.0087. 0.2 0.2 117 1170 0.0040 0.0124 2.7652 1.0198 , 0.0087 2.5345 • 0.0123 0.0087 0.2 0.2 118 1180 0.0040 0.0124 29776 " 1:0286 0.0087 2.5469 0.0123 0.0087 0.2 '0.2 119 1190 0-0040 '0.0124 2.7900' 1-.0373; 0.0088'. 2.5592 0.0123 " 0.0088 0.2 0.2 120 1200. 0.0040 0.0124 2.8024 1.0461 0.0088 2.5715 0.6123 • 0.0088 0.2 '0.2 121 1210 0.0040 0.0124 2.8148 1.0549 0.0068 2.5839 0.0123 -6.0688, 0:2 0.2 122 1220 0.0040 0.0124. 2.8272 1.0637 - 0.0088 2.5962 0.0123 0.0088 0.2 02 123 1230 0.0040 0.0124 2.8396 1.0726 0.0088' • 2,6086 0.6123 0.0088 0.2 0.2 124. 1240" , 0.0040 0-0124 2.8520 1.0814 ' 0.0089 2.6209 0.6123 0.0089• 0.2 0.2 125 1250. 0.6040 0.0124 2.8644 1.0903- 0.0089 " 2.6333-, - 0.0123, 0.0089 0.2 0.2 126 '1260 0.0040 , 0.0124 2.8768 1.0992 0.0089 2.6456 0.0123' 0.0089. •0.2 0.2 127 1270„ 0.0040 0.0124' 2.8892 1.1081 ' 0.0089' 2.6579 0.0123 00089 0.3 0.2 128 1280 0.0040 0.0124 2.9016 1,1170 0.0089 2.6703 0.0123 0.0089 6.3:,. • 0.2 ' 129 1290 0.0040 0.0124 2.9140 .1.1260 0.0089 2.6826 0.0123 0.0089 0.3 0.3 130 1300' 0.0040 0.0124 2.9264 1.1349 0.0090 2.6950 0.0123 0.0090 0.3 0,3 131 1310 - 0.0040 . 6.0124 2.9388 1.1439 " 0:0090 ' 2.7073 0.0123 ' 0:0090 0.3 0.3 132 1320 0.0040 .0.0124 . 2.9512 1.1529,, .0.0090 2.7197 0.6123. 0.0090 0.3 0.3 133 1330 0.0040 0.0124 2.9636 1.1619 0.0090 2.7320 0.6123 0.0090 0.3*. 0.3 134 1346 0.0040 0.0124 2.9760 1.1709 0.0090 2:7444.: • 0.0123 0.0090 0.3 0.3 135 1350 0.0040 0.0124. 2.9884' 1.1800 0.0090. 2.7567 ' 0.0123 0.0090 .0.3, 6.3 136 1360 • 0.0040 • 0.0124 3.0008,'` 1:1891 0.0091 • 2.7691 0.0123, , 0.0091 0.3 0.3 137, ' 1370''- 0.0040 0.0124 • 3.0132 1.1981 0.0091 2.7814 - 0.0123 0.0091 0.3 . 0.3 138 1380 0.0040 0.0124 3.0256. 1.2072 0.0091 2.7938 0-0123 0.0091 0.3 6.3, 139 1390 0.0040 0.6124 •3.0380 1.2163 0.0091 2.8061 0.0123• 0.0091 0.3 0.3 140 1460, 0.0040 0.0124 3.6504 1.2254 0.0091' 2.8185 6.0123 0:0091 0.3 0.3 141 1410 0.0040 - 0.0124; 3.0628 1.2346 0-0091 2.8308 0.0124 0.0091. • 0.3 0.3 142 1420 0.0040 0.0124 3.0752 1.2437 0.0092 ' 2.8432 0.0124,' 0.0092 0.3 0.3 143. 1430 0.0040 0.0124 3.0876 1.2529 0.0092 2.8555 0.0124 0.0092 0.3 0.3' 144 1440 0.0040 0.0124 3.1000 ' 1.2621 , 0.0092 2.6679 6.0124 0.0092 6.3 0.3 Total 1.0000 31000 Hydrograph Volume 20934 (Cubic Feet) File: S6 H-24; pre5.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc.-;. t Page 3 ( ES Project: Tigard Baptist-Church Project Number: 1845 SANTA BARBARA URBAN. HYDROGRAPH Date 2/11/05 SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Basin Site Event:. '10-year pre . Given: Area = 4.64 acres Pt = 3.45 inches, df 10 min. Tc = 20 min. W = 0.2000 routing constant Pervious Area Impervious Area. HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Area = 4.64 acres .'Area = 0 acres Peak Runoff: 1.3 cfs CN = 79 CN = 98 TotaFVol. : " 25365 cf S = 2.66 0.20. 0.2S = 0.53' 0.2S '0.04 Peak Runoff Hyq raph rog 1.4 } 1.2 I I , t-T I t 1.U i , I _.J -r-1 - } i - - - i T 08 LL. I : 0.6 - - i _4 - I'- - - - r f - , I i -1 : ! j.... f 1 { 4.. 0.4 - - : - - - - t f - - i t. ..p . 0.0 •0 200 400 600 800 1000. 1200: 1400 1600 Time in Minutes File: SBUH-24-pre10.XLS 2/11/2005 CESiNW, Inc. Page 11 Pervious Area impervious Area (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) - (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental fated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydra ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0138 0.0138 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0138 0.0276 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0138 0.0414 0.0000 6.0000. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0138 0.0552 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0009 0.0000 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0138 0.0690 0.0000 0.0000 0.0034 0.0025 0.0000 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0138 0.0828 0.0000 0.0000 0.0072 0.0037 0.0000 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0138 0.0966 0.0000 0.0000 0.0120 0.0048 0.0000 0.0 0.0 8 80 0.0040 0.0138 0.1104 0.0000 0.0000 0.0177 0.0057 0.0000 0.0 0.0 9 90 0.0040 0.0138 0.1242 0.0000 0.0000 0.0242 0.0065 0.0000 0.0 0.0 10 100 0.0040 0.0138 0.1380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0313 0.0072 0.0000 0.0 0.0 11 110 0.0050 0.0173 0.1553 0.0000 0.0000 0.0411 0.0098 0.0000 0.0 0.0 12 120 0.0050 0.0173 0.1725 0.0000 0.0000 0.0516 0.0105 0.0000 0.0 0.0 13 130 0.0050 0.0173 0.1898 0.0000 0.0000 0.0628 0.0112 0.0000 0.0 0.0 14 140 0.0050 0.0173 0.2070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0746 0.0118 0.0000 0.0 0.0 15 .150 0.0050 0.0173 , 0.2243 0.0000 0.0000 0.0868 0.0122 0.0000 0.0 0.0 16 160 0.0050 0.0173 0.2415 0.0000 0.0000• 0.0995 0.0127 0.0000 0.0 0.0 17 170 0.0060 0.0207 0.2622 0.0000 0.0000 0.1152 0.0157 0.0000 0.0 0.0 18 180 0.0060 0.0207 0.2829 0.0000 -0.0000 , 0.1314 0.0162 0.0000 0.0 0.0 19 190 0.0060 0.0207 0.3036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1479 0.0166 0.0000 0.0 0.0 20 200 0.0060 0.0207 0.3243 0.0000 0.0000 0.1648 0.0169 0.0000 0.0 0.0 21 210 0.0060. 0.0207 0.3450 0.0000 0.0000 0.1820 0.0172 0.0000 0.0 0.0 22 220 0.0060 0.0207 0.3657 0.0000 0.0000 0.1995 0.0175 0.0000 070 0.0 23 230 0.0070 0.0242 03899 0.0000 0.0000 0.2203 0.0207 0.0000 0.0 0.0 24 240 0.0070 0.0242 0.4140 0.0000 0.0000 0.2413 0.0210 0.0000 0.0. 0.0 25 250 0.0070 0.0242 0.4382 0.0000 0.0000 0.2625 0.0213 0.0000 0.0 0.0 26' 260 0.0070 0.0242 0.4623 0.0000 0.0000 0.2840 0.0215 0.0000 0.0 0.0 27 270 0.0070 0.0242 0.4865 0.0000 0.0000 0.3057 0.0217 0.0000 0.0 0.0 28 280 0.0070 0.0242 0.5106 0.0000 0.0000 0.3275 0.0219 0.0000 0.0 0.0 29 290 0.0082 0.0283. 0.5389 0.0000 0.0000 0.3533 0.0258 0.0000 0.0 0.0 30 300 0.0082 0.0283 0.5672 0.0005 0.0004 0.3793 0.0260 0-0004 0.0 0.0 31 310 0.0082 ' 0.0283 0.5955 0.0015 0.0010 0.4055 '0.0262 0.0010 0.0 0.0 32 320 0.0082 0.0283 0.6238 0.0031 0.0016 0.4318 0.0263 0.0016 0.0 0.0 33 330 0.0082 0.0283 0.6521 0.0052 0.0021 0.4582 0.0265 0.0021' 0.1 0.0 34 340 0.0082 0.0283 0.6803 0.0079 0.0027 0.4848 0.0266 0.0027 0.1 0.0 35 350 0.0095 0.0328 0.7131 '0.0116. 0.0037 0.5157. 0.0309 0.0037 0.1 0.1 36 360 0.0095 0.0328 0.7459 0.0160 0.0044 0.5468 0.0311 0.0044 0.1 0.1 37 370 0.0095 0.0328 0.7787 0.0210 0.0050 0.5780 0.0312 0.0050 0.1 0.1 38 380 0.0095 0.0328 0.8114 0.0266 0.0056 0.6093 0.0313 0.0056 0.2 0.1 39 390 0.0095 0.0328 0.8442 0.0329 0.0062 0.6407 0.0314 0.0062 0.2 0.1 40 400 0.0095 0.0328 ' 0.8770 0.0397 0.0068 0.6721 0.0315 0.0068 0.2 0.2 41 410 0.0134 0.0462 0.9232 0.0503 0.0106 0.7167 0.0445 0.0106 0.3 0.2 42 420 0.0134 0.0462 0.9695 0.0619 0.0116 0.7613 0.0447 0.0116 0.3 0.2 43 430 0.0134 0.0462 1.0157 0.0746 0.0127 0.8061 0.0448 0.0127 0.4 0.3 44 440 0.0180 0.0621 1.0778 0.0931 0.0185 0.8664 0.0603 0.0185 0.5 0.3 45 450 0.0180 0.0621 1.1399 6.1133 0.0202 0.9269 0.0605 0.0202 0.6 0.4 .46 460 0.0340 0.1173 1.2572 0.1556 0.0423 1.0416 0.1147 0.0423 1.2 0.6 47 470 0.0540 0.1863 • 1.4435 0.2329 0.0773 1.2245 0.1829 0.0773 22 1.0 48 480 0.0270 0.0932 1.5366 0.2757 0.0428 1.3162 0.0917 0.0428 1.2 1.3 49 490 0.0180 0.0621 1.5987 0.3057 0.0299 1.3775 .0.0612 0.0299 0.8 1.2 50 500 0.0134 0.0462 1.6450 0.3286 0.0230 1.4231 0.0456 0.0230 0.6 1.0 51 510 0.0134 0.0462 1.6912 0.3522 0.0235 1.4688 0.0457 0.0235 0.7 0.9 52 520 0.0134 0.0462 1.7374 0.3763 0.0241 1.5144 0.0457 0.0241 0.7 0.8 53 530 0.0088 0.0304 1.7678 0.3924 0.0161 1.5445 0.0300 0.0161 0.5 0.7 54 540 0.0088 0.0304 1.7981 0.4087 0.0163 1.5745 0.0300 0.0163 0.5 0.6 , 55 550 0.0088 0.0304 1.8285 0.4252 0.0165 1.6045 0.0300 0.0165 0.5 0.5 56 560 0.0088 0.0304 1.8589 0.4420 0,0168 1.6346 0.0300 0.0168 0.5 0.5 57 570 0.0088' '0.0304 1.8892 0.4589 0.0170 1.6646 0.0301 0.0170 0.5 0.5 58 580 0.0088 0.0304 1.9196 0.4761 0.0172 1.6947 0.0301 0.0172 0.5 0.5 59 590 0.0088 0.0304 1.9499 0.4934 0.0174 1.7248 0.0301 0.0174 0.5 0.5 60 600 0.0088 0.0304 1.9803 0.5110 0.0175 11548 0.0301 0.0175 0.5 0.5 61 610 0.0088 0.0304 2.0107 0.5287 0.0177 1.7849 . 0.0301 0,0177 0.5 0.5 62 620 0.0088 0.0304 2.0410. 0.5466 0.0179 1.8150 0.0301 0.0179 0.5 0.5 63 630 0.0088 0.0304 2.0714 0.5647 0.0181 1.8451 0.0301 .0.0181 0.5 0.5 64 640 0.0088 0.0304 2.1017 0.5830 0.0183 1.8752 0.0301 0.0183 0.5 0.5 65 „ 650 0.0072 0.0248 2.1266 0.5981 0.0151 1.8999 0.0246 . 0.0151 , 0.4 0.5 66 660 0.0072 0.0248 2.1514 0.6133 0.0152 1.9245 0.6246 0.0152 0.4 0.5 67 670 0.0072 0.0248 2.1763 0.6286 0.0153 1.9492 0.0246 0.0153 0.4 0.4 68 680 0.0072 0.0248 2.2011 0.6440 0.0154 1.9738 0.0247 0.0154 0.4 0.4 69 690 0.0072 0.0248 2.2259 0.6595 0.0155 1.9985. ..0.0247 0.0155 0.4 0.4 70 700 0.0072 0.0248 2.2508 0.6752 0.0156 2.0231 0.0247 0.0156 0.4 0.4 71 710 0.0072 0.0248 2.2756 0.6909 0.0157 2.0478 0:0247 0.0157 0.4 0.4 File: SBUH-24-pre10.XLS \ 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) . (5) .(6)'. (7) (8) (9) (10) (1q (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- ' Accumu- Incre- Total, Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental laced lated mental lated. mental Runoff Hydro- Hydra ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff . Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) ("/o of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in)'" (in) . (in) (in) (cfs) (cis) 72 720 0.0072 0.0248 2.3005 ' 0.7067 0.0158 2.0725 0.0247. 0.0158 0.4 0.4 73 730 0.0072 0.0248 2.3253 0.7227 0.0159 2.0971 0.0247 0.0159, 0.4 0.4 74 740 0.0072 0.0248 2.3561 0.7387 0.0160 2.1218 0.0247 0.0160 0.5 0.4 75 750 0.0072 0.0248 2.3750. 47548 6.0161 2.1465 0.0247 0.0161 0.5 0.4 76 760 0.0072 0.0248 2.3998 0.7710 0.0162 2.1712 0.0247 0.0162. _ 0.5 0.5 77 770 0.0057 0.0197 2.4195• 0.7840' 0.0129 2.4907 0.0195. 0.0129 0.4 0.4 78 780 0.0057 0.0197 2.4392 0.7969 0.0130 2.2103 ' 0.0195 0.0130 0.4 0:4 79, 790 0.0057 0.6197 2.4588 0.8100 0.0130 2.2298 0.0195 0.0130 0:4 0.4 80 800 0.0057 0.0197 2.4785 .0.8230 0.0131 2.2493 0.0195 0.0131 0.4 0.4 81 .810 0.0057 0.0197 2.4981 ' 0.8362 0.0131 2.2689 6.0195 0.0131 0.4 0.4 82 820 0.0057 0.0197 2.5178 ' 0.8494 0.0132 2:2884 0.0196 0.0132 0.4 0.4 83 830 0.0057 0.0197 2.5375 0.8626 ..0.0133 2.3080 0.0196 0.0133 0.4 0.4 84 840 - 0.0057 0.0197 2.5571 0.8759 0.0133 2.3276 0.0196 0.0133 0.4 0.4 85 850 0.0057 0.0197 2.5768 0.8893 0.0134 2.3471 0.0196 0.0134 0.4 0.4 86 860 0.0057 0.0197 2.5965 0.9027 0.0134 2.3667 0.0196 0.0134 0.4 0.4 87 870 0.0057 0.6197 2.6161 0.9162 0.6135 2.3862 0.0196 0.0135 0.4 0.4 88 880 0.0057 ,0.0197 2.6358 0.9297 0.0135 2.4058 0.0196. 0.0135 0.4 0.4 89 890 0.0050 0.0173 .2.6531 0.9416 0.0119 2.4229 0.0172 0.0119 0.3 0.4 90 900 0.0050 0.0173 2.6703 0.9535 0:01.19 2.4401 • 0.0172 ' 0.0119 0.3 0.4 91 910 0.0050 0.0173 2.6876 .0.9655 0.0120 2.4573 0.0172 0.0120 0.3 0.3 92 920 0.0050 0.0173 2.7048 0.9775 070120 2.4744. 0.0172 0.0120 0.3 0.3 93 930 0.0050 0.0173 2.7221 0.9895 0.0120 2.4916 0.0172 0.0120 0.3 0.3 94 940 0.0050 0.0173 2.7393 1.0016' 0.0121 2.5088 .0.0172 0.0121 0.3 0.3 95 950 0.0050 0.0173 2.7566 1.0137 0.0121' 2.5259 0.0172 0.0121 0.3 0.3 96 960 0.0050 0.0173 2.7738 1.0259 0.0122 2.5431 0.0172 0.0122 0.3 0.3 97 970 0.0050 0.0173 2.7911 1.0381 0.0122 2.5602 0.0172 .0.0122 0.3 0.3 98' 980, 0.0050 0.0173 2.8083 1.0503 0.0122 2.5774 0.0172 0.0122 0.3 0.3 99 996 0.0050 0.0173 2.8256 1.0626 0.0123 2.5946 0.0172 0.0123 0.3 0.3 .100 1000 0.0050 0.0173 2.8428 1.0749 0.0123 2.6118 0.0172 0.0123 0.3 6.3 101 1010 " 0.0040 0.0138 2.8566 1.0847 0.0099 2.6255. 0.0137 0.0099 0.3 0.3 102 1020 6.0046 0.0138 2.8704 1.0946 0.0099 2.6392 0.0137 0.0099 0.3 0.3 103 '1030 0.0040 0.6138 2.8842 1.1045 0.0099 2.6530 0.0137 0.0099 0.3 0.3 104 1040 0.0040 0.0138 2.8980 1.1144 0.0099 2.6667 0.0137 0.0099 . 0.3 0.3 105 ' 1050 0.0040 0.0138 2.9118 1.1244 0.0099 2.6804 0.0137 0.0099 0.3 0.3 106 1060 0.0040 0.0138 2.9256 1.1344 0.0100 2.6942 0.0137 0.0100 ' 0.3 0.3 107 1070 0.0040 0.0138 2.9394 1.1444 0.0100 2.7079 0.0137 0.0100 0.3 0.3 108 1080. 0.0040 0.6138 2.9532 1.1544 0.0100 2.7217 0.0137 0.0100 0.3 0.3 109 1090 0.0040 0.0138 2.9670 1.1644 0.0100 2.7354 0.0137 .0.0100 0.3 0.3 110 1100 0.0046 0.0138 2.9808 1.1744 0.0101 2.7491 0.0137 0.0101 0.3 0.3 111 1110 0.0040 0.0138 2.9946 1.1845 0.0101 2.7629 0.0137 0.0101 0.3 0.3 112 1120 0.0040 0.0138 10084 1.1946 0.0101 2.7766 0.0137 0.0101 0.3 0.3 113 1130 0.0040 0.0138 '3.0222 1.2047. 0:0101 2.7904 0.0137 0.0101 0.3 0.3 114 1140 0.0040 0.0138 3.0360 1.2149 0.0101 2.8041 0.0137 0.0101 0.3 0.3 115 1150 0.0040 0.0138 3.0498 1.2250 0.0102 2.8179 0.0137 0.0102 0.3 - 0.3 116 1160 0.0040 0.0138 '3.0636 1.2352 0.0102 2.8316 0.0137 0.0102 0.3 0.3 117 1170 0.0040 0.0138 3.0774 1.2454 0.0102 2.8454 0.0137 0.0102 0.3 0.3 118 1180 0.0040 0.0138 3.0912 1.2556 . 0.0102 2:8591 0.0137 0.0102 0.3 0.3. 1119• 1190 0.0040 0.0138 3.1050 1.2658 0.0102 2.8728 0.0137 0.0102. 0.3 0.3 120 1200 0.0040 0.0138 3.1188 1.2760 0.0102 2.8866 0.0137 0.0102 0.3 0.3 121 1210 0.6040 0.0138 3.1326. 1.2863 0.0103 2.9003 0.0137 0.0103 0.3 0.3 122 1220 0.0040 0.0138 3.1464 1.2966 0.0103 2.9141 0.0137 0.0103 0.3 0.3 123 1230 0.0040 0.0138 3.1602 1.3069 0.0103 2.9278 0.0137 0.0103 0.3 0.3 124 1240 0.0040 0.0138 3.1740 1.3172 0.0103 2.9416 0.0137 0.0103 0.3 0.3 125 `1250 0.0040 0.0138 3.1878 1.3276 0.0103 2.9553 0.0137 0.0103 0.3 0.3 126 1260 0.0040 0.0138 3.2016 1.3379 , 0.0104 2.9691. , 0.0137 0.0104 0.3 0.3 127 1270 0.0040 0.0138 3.2154 1.3483 0.0104 2.9828' 0.0137 0.0104 0.3 , 0.3 128 1280 0.0040 0.0138 3.2292: 1.3587 0.0104 2.9966 0.0137 0.0104 0.3 0.3- 129 1290 0.0040 0.0138 3.2430 1.3691 0.0104 3.0103 0.0138 0.0104 0.3 0.3 130 1300 0.0040 0.0138 3.2568 1.3795 0.0104 3.0241 0.0138 0.0104. 0.3 0.3 131 1310 0.0040 0.0138 3.2706 1.3900 0.0104 3.0378 0.0138 0.0104 0.3 0.3 132 1320 0.0040 0.0138 3.2844 1.4004 0.6105 ' 3.0516 0.0138 0.0105 0.3' 0.3 133 1330 0.0040 0.0138 •3.2982 1.4109 0.0105 3.0653 0.0138 0.0105 0.3 0.3 , 134 1340 0.0040 0.0138 3.3120 1.4214 0.0105 3.0791 0.0138 0.0105 0.3 0.3 135 1350 0.0640 0.0138 3.3258 1.4319 0.0105 3.0928 0.0138 0.0105 0.3 '0.3 136 1360 0.0040 ' 0.0138. 3.3396 1.4424 0.0105' 3.1066 0.0138 0.0105 0.3 0.3 137 . .1370 0.0040 0.0138 3.3534. 1.4530 0.0105 3.1203 0.0138 0.0105 0.3 0.3 138. 1380 0.0040 0.0138 3.3672 • 1.4635 0.0106 3.1341 0.0138 0.0106' 0.3 0.3 139 1390 0.0040 0.0138 3.3810 1.4741 0.0106 3.1479 0.0138 0.0106 0.3 0.3 140. 1400 0.0040 0.0138 3.3948 1.4847 0.0106 3.1616 6.0138 0.0106 0.3 0.3 141 1410 0,0040 0.0138 3.4086 1.4953 0.0106 3.1754 0.0138 0.0106 0.3 0.3 '142 1420 0.0040 0.0138 3.4224 1.5059' 0.0106 3.1891 0.0138 0.0106 0.3 0.3 143 1430 .0.0040. 0.0138 3.4362 1.5166 0.0106 3.2029 0.0138 0.0106 0.3 0.3 144, 1440 0.0040 0.01'38 3.4500 1.5272 0.0107 3.2166 0.0138 0.0107 0.3 0.3 Total 1.0000 3.4500. Hydrograph Volume 25365 (Cubic Feet) ' File: SBUH-24-pre10.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc: Page 3 Pervious Area Impervious Area (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) - (9) (10) {11) (12) Time Time , Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated fated. mental fated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydra ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0156 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 .20 0.0040 010156 0.0312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0156 0.0468 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0002 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0156 0.0624 0.0000 0.0000 0.0021 0.0019 0,0000 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0156 0.0780 0.0000 0.0000 0.0057 0:0037 0.0000 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0156 0.0936 0.0000 0.0000 0.0108 _ 0.0051 0.0000 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0156 0.1092 0.0000 0.0000; 0.0172 0.0063 0.0000 0.0 0.0 8 80 0.0040 0.0156 0.1248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0245 0.0073 0.0000 0.0 0.0 9 90 0.0040 0.0156 0.1404 0.0000 0:0000 0.0327 0.0082 0.0000 0.0 0.0 10 100 0.0040 0.0156 0.1560. 0.0000 .0.0000 0.0416 0.0089 0.0000 _ 0.0 0.0 11 110 0.0050 0.0195 0.1755 0.0000- 0.0000 0.0535 0.0120 0.0000 ` 0.0 0.0 12 120 0.0050 .0.0195 0.1950 0.0000. 0.0000 0.0664 0.0128 0.0000 0.0 0.0 13 130 0.0050 0.0195 0.2145 0.0000 0.0000' 0.0799. 0.0135 0.0000 0.0 0.0 14 140 0.0050 0.0195 0.2340 0.0000 0.0000 0.0939 0.0141 0.0000 .0.0 0.0 15 150- 0.0050 0.0195 0.2535 0.0000 0.0000 0.1085 0.0146 0.0000 0.0 0.0 16 160 0.0050 0.0195 0.2730 0.0000 0.0000 0.1236 0.0150 0.0000 0.0 0.0 17 170 0.0060 0.0234 0.2964 0.0000. 0.0000 0.1421 0.0185 0.0000 0.0 0.0 18 180 0.0060 0.0234 0.3198 0.0000 0.0000 0.1611 0.0190 0.0000 0.0 0.0 19 190 0.0060 0.0234 0.3432 0.0000 0.0000 0.1805 0.0194 0.0000 0.0 0.0 20 200 0.0060 0.0234 0.3666 0.0000 0.0000 0.2003 0.0198 0.0000 0.0 0.0 21 210 0.0060 0.0234 0.3900 0.0000 •0.0000 0.2204 0.0201 0.0000 0.0 0.0 22 220 0:0060 0.0234 0.4134 0.0000 0.0000 0.2407 0.0203 0.0000 0.0 0.0 23 230 0.0070 0.0273 0.4407.. 0.0000 0:0000 0.2648 0.0240 0.0000 0.0 0.0 24 240 0.0070 '0.0273 0.4680 0.0000 0.0000 0.2891 0.0243 0.0000 0.0 0.0 25 250 0.0070 0.0273 0.4953 0.0000 0.0000 0.3136 0.0246 0.0000 0.0 0.0 26 260 0.0070 0.0273 0.5226 0.0000 0.0000 0.3384. 0.0248 0.0000 0.0 0.0 27 270 0.0070 0.0273 0.5499 0.0001 0.0001 0.3634 0.0250 0.0001 0.0, 0.0 28 280 0.0070 0.0273 0.5772 0.0008 0.0006 0.3885 '0.0251 0.0006 0.0 0.0 29 290 0.0082 0.0320 0.6092 .0.0022 0.0014 0.4182 0,0297 '0.0014 0.0 0.0 30 300 0.0082 0.0320 0.6412 0.0043 0.0021 0.4480 0.0298 0.0021 0.1 0.0 31 310 0.0082 0.0320 0.6731 0.0072 0.0028 0.4780 0.0300 0.0028 0.1 0:0 32 320 0.0082 0.0320 0.7051 0.0106 0.0035. 0:5082 0.0301 0.0035 0.1 0.1 33 330 0.0082 0.0320 0.7371 0.0147 0.0041 0.5385 0.0303 0.0041 0.1 0.1 34 340 0.0082 0.0320 0.7691 0.0195 0.0047 0.5689 0.0304 0.0047 0.1 0.1 35 350 0.0095 0.0371 0.8061 0.0257 0.0062. 0.6042 0.0353 0.0062 0.2 0.1 36 360 . '0.0095 0.0371 0.8432 0.0327 0.0070 0.6397 0.0355 0.0070 0.2 0.2 37 370 0.0095 0.0371 0.8802 0.0404 0.0077 0.6752 0.0356 0.0077 0.2 0.2 38 380 0.0095 0.0371 0.9173 0.0489 0.0084 0.7109 0.0357 0.0084 0.2 0.2 39 390 0.0095 0.0371 0.9543, 0.0580. 0.0091 0.7467 0.0358 0.0091. 0.3 0.2 40 400, 0.0095 0.0371. 0.9914 0.0678 0.0098. 0.7826 0,0359 0.0098 0.3 0.2 41 410 0.0134 0.0523 1.0436 0.0827 0.0149 0.8333 0.0507 0.0149 0.4 0.3 42 420 0.0134 0.0523 1.0959 0.6988 0.0161 0.8841 0.0508 0.0161 0.5 0.4 43 430 6.0134 0.0523 1.1482 0.1161 0.0173 0.9350. 0.0509 0.0173 0.5 0.4 44 440 0.0180 0.0702 1.2184 0.1410 0.0249 1.0036 0.0686 0.0249 0.7 0.5 45 .450 0.0180 0.0702. 1.2886 0.1678 0.0268 1.0723 0.0687 0.0268 0.8 0.6 46 460 0.0340 0.1326 .1.4212 .0.2230 .0.0553 1.2025 0.1302 0.0553 1.6 0.8 47 470 0.0540. 0.2106 1.6318 0.3220 0.0990 1.4101 0.2075 0.0990 2.8 1.4 48 480 0.0270 0.1053 1.7371 0.3761 0.0541 1.5141- 0.1040 0.0541 1.5 1.7 49 490 0.0180 0.0702 1.8073 0.4136 0.0376 1.5835 0.0694 0.0376 1.1 1.5 50 500 ..0.0134 0.6523 1.8595 -0.4423 0.0287 1.6352 0.0517 0.0287 0.8 1.3 51 510 0.0134 0.0523 1.9118 0.4717 0.0293 1.6870 0.0517 0.0293 0.8 1.1 52 520 0.0134 0.0523. 1.9640 :0.5016 0.0299 1.7387 0.0518. 0.0299 0.8 1.0 53 530 0.0088 0.0343 1.9984 0.5215 0.0199 1.7727 7 0.0340 0.0199 0.6 0.9 54 540 0.0088 0.0343 2.0327 0.5417 0.0202 1.6067 0.0340 0.0202 0.6 6.7 55 550 0.0088 0.0343 2.0670- 0,5621 0.0204 1.8408 0.0340 • 0.0204 0.6 0.7 56 560 0.0088 0.0343 2.1013 0.5828 0.0206 1.8748 0.0340 0.0206 0.6 •0.6 57 570 0.0088 0.0343 2.1356 0.6036 0.0209 1.9089 0.0340 0.0209. 0.6 0.6 58 580 0.0088 0.0343 2.1700 0.6247 0.0211 1.9429 0.0341 0.0211 0.6 0.6 59 590 0.0088 0.0343 2.2043 0.6460 0.0213 1.9770 0.0341 '0.0213 0.6 0.6 60 600 0.0088 0.6343 2.2386 0.6675 0:0215 2.0110 0.0341 0.0215 0.6 0.6 61 610 0.0088 0.0343 21729 0.6892 0.0217 2.0451 0.0341 0.0217 0.6 0.6 62 620 0.0088 0.0343 2.3672 0.7111 0.0219 2:0792 0.0341 0.0219 0.6 0.6 63 630 0.0088 0.0343 2.3416 0.7331 0.0221. 2.1133 0.0341 0.0221 0.6 0.6 64 640 0.0088 0.0343 2.3759 0.7554 0.0223 2.1474 0.0341 0.0223 0.6 0.6 65 650 0.0072 0.0281 2.4040 0.7738 0.0184 '2.1753 0.0279 0.0184 0.5 0.6 66' 660 0.0072 0.0281 2.4320 0.7922 0.0185 2.2032 0.0279 0.0185 0.5 0.6 67 670 0.0072 0.0281 2.4601 0.8108 0:0186 2.2311 0.0279 0.0166 0.5 0.5 68 680 0.0072 0.0281 2.4882 0.8295 0.0187 •2.2590 0.0279 0.0187 0.5 0.5 69 690 0.0072 0.0281 2.5163 0.8484 0.0188 2.2869 0.0279 0.0188 0.5 0.5 70 700 0.0072 0.0281 2.5444 0.8673 0.0189 2.3148 0.0279 0.0189 0.5 0.5 71 710 0.0072 0.0281 2.5724 0.8863 0.0190 2.3428 0.0279 0.0190 0.5. 0.5 File: SBUH-24-pre25.XLS 2/1112005 CESINW, Inc. Page2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- :Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) • (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 2 720 0.0072 0.0281 2.6005 0.9055 0.0191 2.3707 0.0279 0.0191 0.5 0.5 73 730 0.0072 0.0281 2.6286 0.9247 0.0193 2.3986 0.0279 0.0193 0.5 0.5 74 740 0.0072 . 0.0281 2.6567 0.9441 0.0194 2.4266 0.0279 • 0.0194 0.5 0.5 75 750 0.0072 0.0281 2.6848 0.9635 0.0195 2.4545 0.0279 0.0195 0.5 0.5 76 760.., 0.0072 0.0281 2.7128 0.9831 0.0196 2.4824 0.0279 0.0196 0.5 0.5 77 770 0.0057 0.0222.' 2.7351 0.9986 0.0156 2.5045 0.0221 0.0156 0.4 0.5 78 780 0.0057 0.0222 2.7573 1.0143 0.0156 2.5267 '0.0221 0.0156 0.4 0.5. 79 790 0.0057 0.0222 2.7795 1.0299 0.0157 2.5488 _ .0.6221 0.0157 0.4 0.5 80 800 0.0057 0.0222 2.8018 1.0457; 0.0157 2.5709 0.0221 ; 0.0157 0.4 0.5 81 810 0.0057 0.0222 2.8240 1.0615 0.0158 2.5930 0.0221 0.0158 0.4 0.4 82 820 0.0057 0.0222 2.8462 1.0773 0.0158 2.6152 6.0221 0.0158 0.4 0.4 83 830 0.0057 0.0222 2.8685 1.0932 0.0159 2.6373 0.0221 0.0159 0.4 0.4 84 840 0.0057 0.0222 2.8907 1.1092 0.0160 2.6594 0.0221 0.0160 0.4 0.4 85 850 0.0057 0.0222 2.9129 1.1252 0.0160 2.6816 0.0221 0.0160 0.4 0.4 86 860 0.0057 0.0222 2.9351 1.1413 0.0161 2.7037 0.0221' 0.0161 0.5 0.4 87 870 0.0057 0.0222 2.9574 1.1574 0.0161 2.7258 0.0221 0.0161 0.5 0.5 88 880 0.0057 0.0222. 2.9796 1.1736 0.0162 2.7480 0.0221 0.0162 0.5 0.5 89 890 0.0050 0.0195 2.9991 1.1878 0.0142 2.7674 0.0194 0.0142 0.4 0.4 90 900. 0.0050 0.0195 3.0186 1.2021 0.0143 23868 0.0194 0.0143 0.4 0.4 91 910 0.0050 0.0195 3.0381 1.2164 0.0143 2.8062 0.0194 0.0143 0.4 0.4 92 920 0.0050 0.0195 3.0576 1.2308 0.0144 -2.8256 0.0194 0.0144 0.4 0.4 93 930 0.0050. 0.0195 3.0771 1.2451 0.0144 2.8451 0.0194 0.0144 0.4 0.4 94 940 0.0050 0.0195 3.0966 1.2596 0.0144 2.8645 0.0194 0.0144 0.4 0.4 95 950 0.0050 0.0195 3.1161 1.2740 0.0145, 2.8839 0.0194 0.0145 0.4 0.4, 96 960 0.0056 0.0195 3.1356 1.2885 0.0145 2.9033 0.0194 0.0145 0.4 0.4 97 970 0.0050 .0.0195 3.1551 1.3031 0.0145 , 2.9228. 0.0194' 0.0145 0.4 0.4 98 980 0.0050 0.0195 3.1746 1.3177 0.0146 -2.9422 0.0194 0.0146 0:4.. 0.4 99 990 0.0050 .0.0195 3.1941 1:3323 0.0146 2.9616, 0.0194 0.0146 0.4 0.4 100 1000 0.0050 0.0195 3.2136 1.3469 0.0147 2.9810 0.0194 0.0147 0.4 0.4 101 1010 0.0040 ' 0.0156 3.2292 1.3587 0.0117 2.9966 0.0155 0.0117 0.3 0.4 102 1020 0.0040 0.0156 3.2448 1.3704 0.0118 3.0121 0.0155 0.0118 0.3 0.4 103 1030 0.0040 0.0156 3.2604 1.3822 0.0118 3.0277 0.0155 0.0118 0.3 0.4 104 1040 0.0040 0.0156 3.2760 1.3941 0.0118 3.0432 0.0155 0.0118 0.3 . 0.3 105 1050 0.0040 0.0156 3.2916' 1.4059 0.0118 3.0588 0.0155 0.0118 0.3 0.3 106 1060 0.0040 0.0156 3:3072 1.4177 0.0119 3.0743 0.0155 0.0119 0.3 0.3 107 1070 0.0040 0.0156 3.3228 1.4296 0.0119 3.0898 0.0155 0.0119 0.3 0.3 108 1080 0.0040 0.0156 3.3384 1.4415 0.0119 3.1054 0.0155 0.0119 0.3 0.3 109 1090 0.0040 0.0156 3.3540 1.4534 0.0119 3.1209 0.0155 0.0119 0.3 0.3 110 1100, 0.0040 0.0156 3.3696 1.4654 0.0119 3.1365 0.0155 0.0119 0.3 0.3 111 1110 0.0040 0.0156 3.3852 1.4773 0.0120 3.1520 0.0155 0.0120 0.3 0.3 112 1120 0.0040 0.0156 3.4008 1.4893 0.0120 3.1676 0.0155 0.0120 0.3 0.3 113 1130 , 0.0040 0.0156 3.4164 1.5013 0.0120 3.1831 0.0155 0.0120 0.3 0.3 114 1140 0.0040 0.0156 3.4320 1.5133 0.0120 3.1987 0.0155 0.0120 0.3 0.3 115 1150 0.0040 0.0156 3.4476 1.5254 0.0120 3.2142 0.0155 0.0120 0.3 0.3 116 1160. 0.0040 0.0156 3.4632 1.5375 0.0121 3.2298 0.0156 0.0121 0.3 0.3 117 1170 0.0040 0.0156 3.4788 1.5495 0.0121 3.2453 0.0156 0.0121 0.3 0.3 118 1180 0.0040 . 0.0156 3.4944 1.5616 0.0121 3.2609 0.0156 0.0121 0.3 0.3 119 '1190 0.0040 0.0156 3.5100 1.5738 0.0121. 3.2764 0.0156 0.0121 0.3 0.3 120 1200 0.0040 0.0156• 3.5256 1.5859 0.0121 3.2920 0.0156 0.0121 0.3 0.3 121 1210 0.0040 0.0156 3.5412 1.5981 0.0122 3.3075 0.0156 0.0122 0.3 0.3 122 1220 0.0040 0.0156 3.5568 1.6102 0.0122 3.3231 0.0156 0.0122 0.3 0.3 123 1230 0.0040 0.0156 3.5724 1.6224 0.0122 3.3387 0.0156 0.0122 0.3 0.3 124 1240 0.0040 0.0156 3.5880 1.6346 0.0122 3.3542 0.0156 0.0122 0.3 0.3 125 1250 0.0040 0.0156 3.6036 1.6469 0.0122 3.3698 0.0156 0.0122 0.3 0.3 126 1260 0.0040 0.0156 3.6192 1.6591 0.0123 3.3853 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 0.3 , 127 1270 0.0040 0.0156, 3.6348 1.6714 0.0123 3.4009 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 0.3 128 1280 0.0040 0.0156• 3.6504 1.6837 0.0123 3.4164 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 0.3 129 1290 0.0040 0.0156. 3.6660 1.6960 0.0123 3.4320 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 03 130. 1300 0.0040 0.0156 3.6816 .1.7083 0.0123 3.4475 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 0.3 131 1310 0.0040 0.0156 3.6972 1.7207 0.0123 3:4631 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 0.3 132 1320 0.0040 0.0156 3.7128 1.7330 0.0124 3.4786 0.0156 0.0124 0.3 0.3 133 1330 0.0040 0.0156 3.7284 1.7454 0:0124 3.4942 0.0156 , 0.0124 0.3 0.3 134 1340 0.0040 0.0156 3.7440 1.7578 0.0124 3.5098 0.0156 0.0124 0.3 0.3 135 1350 0.0040 0.0156 3.7596 .1.7702 0.0124 ' 3.5253 0.0156 0.0124 0.3 0.3 136 1360 0.0040 0.0156 3.7752 1.7826 0.0124 3.5409 0.0156 0.0124 0.3 0.3 137 1370 0.0040 0.0156 3.7908 1.7951 0.0124 . • 3.5564 0.0156 0.0124 0.3 0.3 138 1380 0.0040 0.0156 3.8064 1.8075 0.0125', 3:5720 0.0156 0.0125 0.3 0.3 139 1390 0.0040 0.0156 3.8220 1.8200 0.0125 3.5876 0.0156 0.0125 6.4 0.3 140 1400 0.0040 0.0156 3.8376 1.8325 0.0125 3.6031 0.0156 0.0125 0.4 0.3 141 1410 0.0040 0.0156 3.8532 1.8450 0.0125 3.6187'; 0.0156 0.0125 0.4 0.4 '142 1420 0.0040 0.0156 3.8688 1.8575 . 0.0125 3.6342 0.0156 0.0125 0.4 0.4 143 1430 0.0040 • 0.0156 3.8844 1.8701 0.0125 3.6498 0.0156 0.0125 0.4 0.4 144 1440 6.0040 0.0156 3.9000 1.8826 0.0126 3.6654 0.0156 0.0126 0.4 0.4 Total 1.0000 3.9000 Hydrograph Volume 31329 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-pre25.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 CES NW Project: Tigard Baptist Church Project Number: 1845 SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 2/11/05 SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Basin: Site Event: 2-year post Given: Area = 4.64 acres Pt = 2.5 inches r dt = 10 min. Tc = . 14 min. W = 0.2632 routing constant Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Area = 2.66 acres Area 1.98 acres Peak Runoff:' 1.5 cfs. CN = 79 CN = 98 Total Vol.: 24216 -cf S = 2.66 S = 0.20 0.2S = 0.53. 0.2S 0.04 Peak Runoff Hydrograph 6 ! , : 1.4 - , - - r i- - 1.2 --I- -L j' , { -r•-.. _ ' i 1 1 1.0 J f I ! i ! I 0 f T I { i i - - . , 0.4 ! - - - - I ! 0.2 .i . ; J 71- 0.0' 0 200 400 600 800 1000. 1200 1400. 1600 Time in. Minutes . File: SBUH724-P0st2.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 1 Pervious Area Impervious Area . . (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6), (7) (8) (9) , (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental fated fated mental, lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) On') (in) • (in) (in), (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 1 16 0.0040 0.0100 0.0100 0.0000 ' 0.0000. 0.0000 P.0000, 0.0000 ' 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0100 0.0200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 . 3 30 0.0040 0.0100 0.0300 0,0000 0.0060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0100 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0100 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0:0004 0.0004 0.0002 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0100 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 0.0016 0.0013. 0.0005 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0100 0.0700 0.0000 0.0000 0.0037 . ' 0.0020 0.0009 0.0 0.0 8 -.80 0.0040 0.0100 0.0800 0.0000 0.0000 0.0063 0.0027- 0.0011 0.0 0.0 9 90 0.0040 0.0100 '0.0900 0.0000 0.0000 0.0096 0.0032 0.0014 0.0 0.0 10 100 0.0040 0.0100 0.1000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0133 0.0038 0.0016 0.0 0.0 11 110 0.0050 0.0125 0.1125 0.0000 0.0000 0.0186 0:0053 0.0023 0.1 0.0 12 120 0.0050 0.0125 0.1250 0.0000 0.0000 0.0246 0.0060 '0.0025 0.1 0.1 13 130 0;0050 0.0125 0.1375 0.0000 0.0000 0.0311 0.0065 0.0028 0.1 0.1 14 140 0.0050. 0.0125 0.1500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0381 0.0070 0.0030 0.1 0.1 15 150 0.0050 0.0125 0.1625 0.0000 0.0000 0.0455 0.0074 0.0032 0.1 0.1 16 160 0.0050 0.0125 0.1750 0.0000 0.0000. 0.0532 0.0078 0.0033 0.1 0.1 .17 170 0.0060 0.0150 0.1900 0.0000 0.0000 0.0630 0.0098 0.0042 0.1 0.1 18 180 0.6060 0.0150 0.2050 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0732 . 0.0102 0.0044 0.1 0.1 19 190 0.0060' 0.0150 .0.2200. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0838 0.0106 0.0045 0.1 0.1 20 200 0.0060 0.0150 0.2350 . , 0.0006 0.0000 0.0947 .0.0109 0.0041 0.1 0.1 21 210 0.0060 0.0150 0.2500 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.1059 0.0112 0.0048 0.1 0.1 22 220 0.0060 0.0150 0.2650 0.0000 0.0000 0.1174 0.0115 0.0049 0.1 0.1 23 230 0.0070 0.0175 0.2825 0.0000 0.0000 0.1310 0.0137 0.0058 0.2 0.1 24 240, 0.0070 0.0175 0.3000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.1450. 0.0140 0.0060 0.2 0.2 25 250 ` 0.0070 0.0175 0.3175 0.0000 0.0000 0.1592 0.0142 0.0061 0.2 0.2 26 260 0.0070 6.0175 0.3350 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.1737 0.6145 0.0062 0.2 0.2 27 270 0.0070 6.0175 0.3525 0.0000 0.0000 0.1884 0.0147 0.0063 0.2 0.2 28 280 0.0070 0.0175' . 0:3700 0.0000 0.0000 0.2032 0.0148 0.0063 0.2 0.2 29 290 0.0082 0.0205 0.3905 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.2208 0.0176 0.0075 0.2 0.2 30 300 0.0082 0.0205 0.4110 0.0000 0.0000 0.2386 0.0178 0.0076 0.2 0.2 31 310 0.0082 0.0205 0.4315 0.0000 0.0000 0.2566 0.0180 0.0077 0.2 0.2 32 320 0.0082 0.0205 0.4520 0.0000 0.0000 0.2748 0.0182 0.0078 0.2 0.2 33 330 0.0082 0.0205 0.4725 0.0000. .0.0000 0.2931 0.0183 0.0078 0.2 0.2 34 340 0.0082 0.0205 0.4930 , 0.0000 0.0000 0.3116 0.0185 0.0079 0.2 ' 0.2 35 350 0.0095 0.0238 0.5168 0.0000 0.0000 0.3331. 0.0215 0.0092 • 0.3" 0.2 36 360 0.0095 0.0238 0.5405 0.0000 0.0000 0.3548 6.0217 0.0093 0.3 0.2 37 370 0.0095 0.0238 0.5643 0.0004 0.0004 0.3766 0.0218 0.0095 0.3. 0.3 38 380 0.0095 0.0238 0.5880 0.0012 0.0008 0.3985 0.0219 0.0098 0.3 0.3 39 390 0.0095 0.0238 0.6118 0.0023 0.0012 6.4206 0.0221 0.0101 0.3 0.3 40 400 0.0095 0.0238 0.6355 0.0039 0.0016 0.4427• 0.0222 0.0103 0.3 0.3 41 410 0.0134. 0.0335 0.6690, 0.0067 0.0028 0.4741 0.0314 0.0150 0.4 0.3 42 420 0.0134 0.0335 0.7625 0.0103 0.0036 0.5057 0.0316 0.0155 0.4 0.4 43 430 0.0134 0.0335 0.7360 0.0146 0.0043 0.5374 0.0317 0.0160 0.4 0.4 44 440 0.0180 0.0450 0.7810 0.0214 0.0068 , 0.5802 0.0428 0.0222 0.6 0.5 45 450 0.0180 0.0450 0.8260 0.0293 0.0080 0.6232 0.0430 0.0229 0.6 0.6 46 .460 0.0340 0.0850 0.9110 0.0474 0.0180 0.7049 0.0817 ! 0.0452 '1.3 0.8 47 470 0.0540 0.1350 1.0460 0.0834 0.0360 0.8355 0.1307 0.0764 2.1 1.3 48 480 .0.0270 0.0675 1.1135 0.1045 0.0211. 019012 0.0657 0.0401 1.1 .1.5 49 490 0.0180 0.0450 1.1585 0.1196 0.0151 0.9451 0.0439 0.0274 0.8 1.2 50 .500 0.0134 0.0335 1.1920 0.1314 0.0118 0.9778 .0.0327 0.0207 ' 0.6 0.9 51 510 0:0134 6.0335 1.2255 '0.1436 •'0.0122 1.0106 -0.0328 0.0210 0.6 0.7 52 520 0.0134 0.0335 1.2590 0.1563 0.0126 1.0434 0.0328 0.0212 0.6 0.7 53 530 0.0088 0.0220 1.2810 0.1648 0.0085 1.0649: 0.0216 .0.0141 0.4 0.6 54 .540 0.0088 0.0220 1.3030 0.1735 0.0087 1.0865 0.0216 0.0142 0.4 0.5 55 550 0.0088 0.0220 1.3250 0.1824 0.0089 1.1081 0.0216 0.0143 0.4 0.4 56 560 0.0088 0.0220 1.3470. 0.1914 0.0090 1.1297' 0.0216 0.0144 0.4 0.4 57 570 '0.0088 0.0220 1.3690 0.2006 0.0092 1.1513 0.0216 0.0145' 0.4 0.4 58 580 0.0088 0.0220 1.3910 0.2099 0.0094 1.1729 0.0216 0.0146 0.4 0.4 59 590 0.0088 0.0220 1.4130 0.2195 0.0095 1.1945 0.0216 0.0147 0.4 0.4 60 600 0.0088 0.0220 1.4350 0.2291 0.0097 '.1.2162 0.0216 " 0.0148 0.4 0.4 61 610 0.0088 0.0220 1.4570 0.2389 0.0098 1.2378 0.0216 0.0149 0.4 0.4' 1 62 620 0.0088 0.0220 1.4790 6.2489 0.0100 1.2595 0.0217 0.0150 0.4 0.4 63 630 0.0088 0.0220 1,5010 0.2590 0.0101 1.2811 • 0.0217 0.0150 '0.4 0.4 64 640' 0.0088 0.0220 1.5230. ' 0.2693 0.0103 1.3028 0.0217 0.0151 0.4 0.4 65 650 0.0072. 0.0180 1.5410 0.2778 0.0085 1.3205 0.0177 0.0124 0.3 0.4 66 660 ' 6.0072 6.0180 1.5590 0.2864 0.0086 1.3383 0.0177 0.0125 0.4 0.4 67 670 0.0072 0.0180 1.5770.' 0.2951 0.0087 1.3560 0.0177 0.0126 0.4 0.4 68 686 6.0072 '0.0180 1.5950. 0.3038 0.0088 1.3738 ' 0.0178 0.0126 0.4 0.4 69 690 0.0072 0.0180 1.6130 - 0.3127 0.0089 1.3915 0.0178 0.0127 0.4 0.4 70 700 0.0072 0.0180 1.6310 0.3216 0.0089. 1.4093 0.0178 0.0127 0.4 0.4 71 710 0.0072 0.0180 1.6490 0.3307 0.0090 1.4271 0.0178 0.0128 0.4 0.4 File: SBUH-24-post2.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW,`Inc. Page 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- .,Accumu- ' Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0180 1.6670 0.3398 0.0091 1.4449 0.0178 -0.0128 0.4 0:4' 73 730 0.0072 0.0180 1.6850 0.3490 0.0092 1.4626 0.0178 0.0129 0.4 0.4 74 740 0.0072 0.0180 1.7030 0.3583 0.0093 1.4804 0.0178 0.0129 0.4 0.4 75 750 0.0072 0.6180 1.7210 0.3677 0.0094 :1.4982 .0:0178 0.0130 0.4 0.4 76 760 - 0.0072 0.0180 -1.7390 0.3771 0.0094 115160 0.0178 0.0130, - 0.4 0.4 77 770 0.0057 0.0143 1.7533 0.3846 0.0075 1.5301 '0.'0141 0.0103 0.3 0.3 78 780 0.0057 0.0143 1.7675 0.3922 0.0076 1.5442 0.0141 0.0104 0.3 0.3 79 790 0.0057 0.0143 1.7818 0.3999 0.0076 1.5583 0.0141 0.0104 0.3 0.3 80 800 0.0057 0.0143 1.7960 0.4075 0.0077 1.5724 0.0141 '0.0104 0.3 0.3 81 810 0.0057 0.0143 1.8103 0.4153 0.0077 1.5865 0.0141 0.0104 0.3 0.3 82 820 0.0057 0.0143 1.8245 0.4230 0.0078 1.6006 0.0141 0.0105 0.3 0.3 83 830 0.0057 0.0143 1.8388 0.4309 0.0078 11.6147 0.0141 0.0105 0.3 0.3 84 840 0.0057 0.0143. 1.8530 0.4387 0.0079 1.6288 0.0141 0.0105 0.3 0.3 85 850 0.0057 0.0143 1.8673 0.4466 0.0079 1.6429 0.0141 0.0106 0.3 0.3 86 860 0.0057 0.0143 1.8815 0.4546 0.0080 1.6570 0.0141 0.0106 0.3 0.3 87 870 0.0057 0.0143 1.8958 0.4626 0.0080 1.6711 0.0141 0.0106 0.3 0.3 88 880 0.0057 0.0143 1.9100 0.4707 0.0080 1.6852 0.0141 0.0106 0.3 0.3 89 890 0.0050 0.0125 1.9225 0.4778 0.0071 1.6976 0.0124 0.0094 0.3 0.3 90 900 0.0050 0.0125 1.9350 0.4849 0.0071 1.7100 0.0124 0.0094 0.3 0.3 91 910 0.0050 0.0125 1.9475 0.4920 0.0072 1.7223 , 0.0124 0.0094 0.3 0.3 92 920 0.0050 0.0125 1.9600 0.4992 0.0072 1.7347 0.0124 0.0094' 0.3 0.3 93 930 0.0050 0.0125 1.9725 0.5065 0.0072 1.7471 0.0124 0.0094 0.3 0.3 94 940 0.0050 0.0125 1.9850 0.5137 0.0073 1.7595 0.0124 0.0094 0.3 0.3 95 950 0.0050 0.0125 1.9975 0.5210 0.0073 1.7719 .0.0124 0.0095 0.3 0.3 96 .960 0.0050 0.0125 2.0100 0.5283 0.0073 1.7843 0.0124. 0.0095 0.3 0.3 97 970 0.0050 , • ,0:0125' 2.0225 0.5357 0.0074 1.7967 0.0124 0.0095 0.3 0.3 98 980 0.0050 0.0125 2.0350 0.5431 0.0074 .1:8090 0.0124, 0.0095, 0.3 0.3• 99 990 0.0050 0.0125 2.0475 0.5505 0.0074 1.8214. 0.0124 0.0095 0.3 0.3 100 1000 0.0050 0.0125 2.0600 0.5579 0.0074 1.8338 0.0124 0.0096 .0.3 0.3 . 101 1010 0.0040 0.0100, 2.0700 0.5639 0.0060 1.8438 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.3 102 1020 010040 0.0100 2.0800 0.5699 0.0060 - 1.8537 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 103 1030 0.0040 0.0100 2.0900 0.5759 0.0066 • 1.8636 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 104 1040 0.0040 0.0100 2.1000 0.5820 0.0060 1.8735 0.0099 0.0077 0.2. 0.2 105 1050 0.0040 0.0100 2.1100 0.5880 0.0061 1.8834 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 106 1060 0.0040. 0.0100 2.1200 0.5941 0.0061 1.8933 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 . 107 1070 0.0040 0.0100 2.1300 0.6002 0.0061 1.9033 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 108 1080 0.0040 0.0100 2.1400 0.6063 0.0061 " 1.9132 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 6.2 109 1090 0.0040 0.0100 2.1500 0.6124 0.0061 1.9231 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 110 1100 0.0040 0.0100 2.1600 0.6186 0.0061 1.9330 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 111 1110 0.0040 0.0100 2.1700 0.6247 0.0062 1.9430 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 112 1120 0.0040 0.0106 2.1800 0.6309 0.0062 1.9529 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 113 1130 0.0040 0.0100 2.1900 0.6371 0.0062 1.9628 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 114 1140 0.0040 0:0100 2.2000 0.6433 0.0062 1.9727 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 115 1150 0.0040 0.0100 2.2100. 0.6496 0.0062 1.9827 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 116 .1160 , • 0.0040 . 0.0100 2.2200 0.6558 0.0063 ; ;'1.9926 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 117 1170 0.0040 0.0100 2.2300. 0.6621 6.0063 2.0025 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 118 1180 0.0040 0.0100 2.2400 0.6684 0.0063 2.0124. ' • 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 119 1190 0.0040 0.0100 2.2500 0.6747 0.0063 2.0224 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 120 1200 0.0040 0.0100 2.2600 0.6810 0.0063 2.0323 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 121 1210 0.0040 0.0100 2.2700 0.6873 0.0063 2.0422, 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2. 122 1220 0.0040 0.0100 2.2800 0.6937 0.0064 ' 2.0521 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 123 1230 0.0040 0.0100 2.2900 0.7000 0.0064 2.0621 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 124 1240 0.0040 •0.0100 2.3000 0.7064 0.0064 2.0720 00099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 125 1250 0.0040 0.0100 2.3100 0.7128 0.0064 .2.0819 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 126 1260 0.0040 0.0100 2.3200 _ 0.7193 0.0064 2.0919 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 127 1270 0.0040 0.0100 2.3300 0.7257 0.0064 2.1018 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 128 1280 0.0040 0.0100 2.3400 0.7321 0.0065 2.1117 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 129 1290 0.0040 0.0100 2.3500 0.7386 0.0065 2.1217 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 130 1300 0.0040 0.0100 2.3600 0.7451 0.0065 2.1316 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 131 1310 0.0040 0.0100 2.3700 0.7516 0.0065 2.1415 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 132 1320 0.0040 0.0100 2.3800 0.7581 0.0065 2.1515 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 133 1330 0.0040 0.0100. 2.3900 0.7646 0.0065 2.1614 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 134 1340 0.0040 0.0100 2.4000 0.7712 0.0065 2.1714 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 135 1350 '0.0040 0.0100 2.4100 0.7777 0.0066 2.1813 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 136 1360 0.0040. 0.0100 2.4200 03843 0.0066 2.1912 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 137 1370 0.0040 0.0100 2.4300 0.7909 0.0066 2.2012 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 138 1380 0.0040 0.0100 2.4400. 0.7975 0.0066 2.2111 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 139 1390 0.0040 , 0.0100 2.4500 0.8041 0.0066 2.2210 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 140 1400 0.0040 0.0100 2.4600 •0.8107 0.0066 2.2310 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 141 1410 0.0040 0.0100 2.4700 '0.8174 0.0066 2.2409 0.0099 0.0081 0.2 0.2 142 1420 0.0040 0.0100 2.4800 0.8241 0.0067 2.2509 0.0099 0.0081 0.2 0.2 143 1430 0.0040 0.0100 2.4900 0.8307 0.0067 2.2608 0.0099 0.0081 0.2 0.2 144 1440 0.0040' 0.0100 2.5000 0.8374 0.0067 2.2707 0.0099 0.0081 0.2 0.2 Total 1.0000 2.5000 Hydrograph Volume 24216 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-post2.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 CE S N ProjeTigard Baptist Church . 'W~ Project Number: 1845' SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH :Date: 2111105., SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Basin: Site Event: 5-year post Given: Area = 4.64,acres Pt = 3.1 inches _ dt = 10 min. Tc = 12 min: „ W = 0.2941 routing constant 4 Pervious Area Impervious Area " ',HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Area = 2.66.acres Area _ 1.98 acres Peak Runoff:: 2.1 cfs CN 79 CN = 98",. " Total Vol. 32586' cf S' _ 2.66. S, _ ' 0.20 0.2S = 0.53 0.2S -1 0:04 Peak.'Runoff Hygro'graph 2.5 J , {I~ t . - _ 2.0. I I' I t - - _ _ _ I - , i.. 1 - t i 1.5 I ( r I r - e 3 I t. o - 4F- i 10 i .t. . ~ i I ~ ' I i - - : 05 a- I I. : 0:0 0 . 200 -400, 600 800 1000 1200 .1400, 1600 Time in Minutes' File: SBUH-24-post5.XLS 2/11/2005 ' CESINW, Inc: Page:'1' Pervious Area Impervious Area (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) . (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental Iated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (CIS) 1 10 0.0040 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0124 0.0248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0124 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.6124 0.0496 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0004 0.0002 0.0' 0.0 5 50 •0.0040 0.0124 0.0620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0020 0.0016 0.0007 .0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0124 0.0744 0.0000 '0.0000 0.0047 0.0028 0.0012 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0124• 0.0868 0.0000 0.0000 0.0085 0.0037 0.0016 0.0 0.0 8 80 0.0040 0.0124 0.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0130 .0.0045 .0.0019 0.1 0.0 9 90 0.0040 0.0124 -0.1116 0.0000 0.0000 0.0182 •0.0052 0.0022 0.1 0.1 10 100 0.0040 0.0124 0.1240 0.0000 0.0000 0.0241 0.0059 0.0025 0.1 0.1 11 110 0.0050 0.0155 0.1395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0322 0.0081 0.0034 0.1 0.1 12 120 0.0050 0.0155 0.1550 0.0000 0.0000 0.0410 0.0088 0.6038 0.1 0.1 13 130 0.0050 0.0155 0.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0504 0.0094 0.0040 0.1 0.1 14 .140 0.0050 0.0155 0.1860 0.0000 0.0000 0.0604 0.0100 0.0043 0.1 0.1 15 150 0.0050 0.0155 0.2015 0.0000 0.0000 0.0708 0.0104 0.0045 0.1 0.1 16 160 0.0050 0.0155 0.2170 0.0000 0.0000 0.0816 0.0108 0.0046 0.1 0.1 17 170 0.0060 0.0186 0.2356 0.0000 0.0000 0.0951 0.0135 0.0058 0.2 0.1 18' 180 0.0060 0.0186 0.2542 0.0000 0.0000 0.1091 0.0139 0.0060 0.2 0.2 19 .190 0.0060 0.0186 0.2728 0.0000 0.0000 0.1234 0.0143 0.0061 0.2' 0.2 20 200 0.0060 0.0186 0.2914 0.0000 0.0000 0.1381 0.0147 0.0063 0.2 0.2 21 210 . 0.0060 0.0186 • 0.3100 0.0000 0.0000 0.1531 0.0150 0.0064 0.2 0.2 22 220 0.0060 0.0186 0.3286 0.0000 0.0000 0.1684 0.0153 0.0065 0.2 0.2 23 '230 0.0070 0.0217 0.3503 0.0000 0.0000 0.1865 0.0181 0.0077 0.2 0.2 24 240 0.0070 0.0217 0.3720 0.0000 0.0000 0.2049 0.0184 - 0.0079 0.2 0.2 25 250 0.0070 0.0217 0.3937 0.0000 0.0000 0.2236 0.0187 0.0080 0.2 0.2 26 260 0.0070. 0.0217 0.4154. 0.0000 0.0000 0.2425 0.0189 0.0081 0.2 0.2 27 270 0.0070 0.0217 0.4371 0.0000 0.0000 0.2616 0.0191 0.0081 0.2 0.2 28 280 0.0070' 0.0217 0.4588 0.0000 0.0000. 0.2809 0.0193 0.0082 0.2. 0.2 29 290 0.0082 0.0254 0.4842 0.0000 0.0000 0.3036 0.0228 0.0097 0.3 0.2 30 300 0.0082 0.0254 0.5096 0.0000 0.0000 0.3266 0.0230 0.0098 0.3 0.3 31 310 0.0082 0.0254 0.5351 0.0000 0.0000 0.3498 0.0232 0.0099 0.3 0.3 32 320 0.0082 0.0254 0.5605 0.0003 0.0003 0.3731 0.0233 0.0101 0.3 0.3 33 330 0.0082 0.0254 0.5859 0.0011 0.0008 0.3966 0.0235 0.0105 0.3 0.3 34 340 0.0082 0.0254 0.6113 0.0023 0.0012 0.4202 0.0236 0.0108 0.3 0.3 35 350 0.0095 0.0295 0.6408 0.0043 0.0020 0.4477 0.0275 0.0129 0.4 0.3 36 360 0.0095 0.0295 0.6702 0.0069 0.0026. 0.4753 0.0276 0.0133 0.4 0.3 37 370 0.0095 0.0295 0.6997 0.0100 0.0031 0.5030 0.0277 0.0136 0.4 0.4 38 380 0.0095. 0.0295 0.7291 0.6137 0.0037 0.5309 0.0279 0.0140 0.4 0.4 39 390 0.0095 0.0295 0.7586 0.0178 0.0042 0.5589 0.0280 0.0143 0.4 0.4- 40 400 0.0095 0.0295 0.7880 0.0226 0.0047 0.5869 0.0281 0.0147 0.4 0.4 41 410 0.0134 0.0415 0.8296 0.0300 0.0075 0.6266 0.0397 0.0212 0.6 0.5 42 420 0.0134 . 0.0415 0.8711 0.0384 0.0084 .0.6665' . 0.0399 0.0218 0.6 0.5 43 430 0.0134 0.0415 0.9126 • 0.0478 '0.0093 0.7065 0.0400 0.0224 0.6 0.6 44 440 0.0180 0.0558 0.9684 0.0616 0.0139 0.7603 0.0539 . 0.031C 0.9 0:7 45 450 0.0180 0.0558 1.0242 0.0770 '0.0154 0.8144 0.0541 0.0319 0.9' 0.8 46 460 0.0340 0.1054 1.1296 0.1098 0.0328 0.9170 0:1025 0.0626 1.8 171 47 470 0.0540 0.1674 1,2970 0.1711 0.0613, .1.0807, 0.1637 0:1050 2.9 1.8 , 48 480 0.0270 0.0837 1.3807 0.2056 0.0344 1.1628 0.0822 0.0548 1.5 2.1 49 490 0.0180 0.0558 1.4365 0.2298 0.0242 1.2177 0.0549 0.0373 1.0 1.6 50 500 0.0134 0.0415 1.4781 0.2485 0.0187 1.2586 0.0409 0.0282 - 0.8 1.2 51 510 0.0134 0.0415 1.5196 0.2677 0.0192 1.2995 0.0409 0.0285 0.8 1.0 52 520 0.0134 0.0415 1.5612 0.2874 0.0197 1.340'4 0.0409 0.0288 0.8 0.9 53 530 0.0088 0.0273 1.5884 0.3006 0.0132 1.3673. 0.0269 0.0191 0.5 0.8 54 540 0.0088 0.0273 1.6157 0.3140 0.0134 1.3942 0.0269. 0.0192 0.5 0.6 55 550 0.0088 0.0273 1.6430 0.3277 0.0136 1.4212 0.0269 0.0193 0.5 ' 0.6 56 560 0.0088 0.0273 1.6703 0.3415 0.0138 1.4481 0.0269 • 0.0194 0.5 0.6 57 570 0.0088 0.0273 1.6976 0.3555 0.0140 1.4750 0.0269 0.0195 0.5 0.6 58 580 0.0088 0.0273 1.7248 0:3697 0.0142 1.5020 0.0270 0.0196 0.6 0.6 59 590 0.0088 0.0273 1.7521 0.3840 0.0144.' 1.5290 0.0270 0.0197 0.6 0.6 60 600 0.0088 0.0273 1.7794 0.3986 0.0146 1.5559 0.0270 0.0199 0.6 0.6 61 610 0.0088 0.0273 1.8067 0.4133 0.0147 1.5829 0.0270 0.0200 0.6 0.6 62 620 0.0088 0.0273 1.8340 0.4282 . 0.0149 1.6099 0.0270 0.0201 0.6 '0.6 63 630 0.0088 0.0273 1.8612 0.4433 0,0151 1.6369 ' 0.0270 0.0202 0.6 0.6 64 640 0.0088 0.0273 1.8885 0.4585 0.0152• . ' ' 1.6639 0.0270 0.0203 0.6 0.6 65 650 0.0072 0.0223 1.9108 '0.4711 0.0126 1.6860 0.0221 0.0166 0.5 0.5 66 660 0.0072 0.0223 1.9332 0.4838 0.0127 1.7081 0.0221 0.0167 0.5 0.5 67 670 0.0072 0.0223 1.9555 0.4966 0.0128 1.7302• 0.0221 0.0168 0.5 0.5 . 68 680 0.0072 0.0223 1.9778. 0.5095 6.0129 1.7524 0.0221 0.0168 0.5 0.5 69 690 0.0072- 0.0223 2.0001 0.5226 0.0130 1.7745 0.0221 . 0.0169 0.5 0.5 70 700 0.0072 0.0223 2.0224 0.5357 0.0131 1.7966 0.0221 0.0170 0.5 0.5 71 710 0.0072 0.0223 2.0448 0.5489 0.0132 1.8187 0.0221 0.0170 0.5 .0.5 File: SBUH-24-post5.XLS' 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5). (S) (7) (8) (9) (10(11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total - Instant Design Incre-' Distn--' mental lated lated mental fated`.. mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro-' ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in)' (in) (in) (in) (in(in) (cfs) . (cfs) , 72 720 0.0072 0.0223 2.0671 0.5622 0.0133 1.8409 0.6221 0.0171 •0.5 0.5 73 730 0.0072 0.0223 2.0894 0.5756 0.0134 1.8630 0.0221 0.0171 0.5' 0.5 74 740 0.0072 0.0223 2.1117 0.5891 0.0135 1.8851'' .0.0221 0.0172 0.5 0.5 75, 750 0.0072 0.0223 2.1340 .0.6027 0.0136 1.9073 0.0221 0.0172 0.5 0.5 76 760 0.0072 0.0223 2.1564 0.6163' 0.0137 1.9294 0.0221 0.0173 '0.5 0.5 77 770 0.0057 0.0177 2.1740 0.6272 0.0109 1.9470 0.0175 0.0137 0.4 0.5 78 786 0.0057 0.0177 2.1917 6.6382 0.0109 1.4645 0.0175 0.0138. 0.4 ' 0.4 79 790 0:0057 0.0177 2.2094 ,0.6492 6.0110 1.9820 0.0175 , 0.0138 - 0:4 0.4 80". ' 800 0.0057 0.0177 2.2270 0.6602 0.0111 1.9996 0.0175 0.0138 0,4 0.4 81' 810 0.0057 0.0177 2.2447 0.6713 0.0111 2.0171 0.0175 0.0139 0.4 0.4 82 820 0.0057 , . 0.0177 • 2.2624' 6.6825 0.0112 2.0347 0.0175 . 0.0139 0.4 0.4 83 -830 ' 0:0057 0.0177 2.2801 0.6937 0.0112 2:0522 0.0175 '.0.0139 0.4 0.4 84 840 0.0057 0.0177 12977 0.7050 0.0113 2.0697 0.0175 0.0139 0.4: 0.4 85 850 0.0057 0.0177 2.3154 '0.7163 _ 0.01-13, 2.0873 0.675, 0.0140 0.4 ' 0.4 86, 860 0.0057. 0.0177 2.3331 01277 0.0114 2.1048 0.0176 0.0140 0.4 0.4 87 870 0.0057 0.0177. 2.3507 0.7391 0.0114 2.1224 0.0176 0.0140 0.4 0.4 88 880• 0.0057 6.6177 2.3684 0.7505 0:0115 2.1400 • 0.0176; 0.0141 0.4 0.4 89 890 ` 0.0050 0.0155 2.3839 0.7606 0.0101 2.1554 0.0154 0.0124 ' 0.3 0.4 '90 900 0.0050 0.0155 2.3994 0.1708 0.0101 2.1708 , 0.0154 0.0124 0.3 0.4 91 910 0.0050 0.0155 2.4149 0.7809' 0.0102 2.1862 0.0154 0.0124 0.3 0.4 92 920 0.0050 0.0155 2.4304 017912 0.0102 2.2016 0.0154 0.0124 0.3 0.4 93 930 0.0050 0.0155 2.4459 ' 0.8014 0.0102, 2.2170 0.0154 0.0124 0.3 0.3 94 940 0.0050 • 0.0155 2.4614 0.8117 0.0103 2.2324 0.6154 , 6.0125 0.3, 0.3 95 950 - 0,0050 0.0155 2.4769 0.8220 0.0103 2.2478 0.0154 0.0125 0.4 0.4 96 960 0.0056 0.0155 2.4924 0.8323 0.0103 2.2632 0.0154 0.0125 0.4 0.4 97. 970 0.0050 0.0155 2.5079. 0.8427 • 0.0104 2.2786 0.0154 6.0125 0.4 0.4 98 980 0.0050 • 0.0155 2.5234 0:8531 0.0104 '2.2940 0.0154 0.0125 0.4 0.4 99. 990 0.0050 0.0155 •2.5389 0.8636 0.0105 2.3094 -,.,0.0154 0.0126 0,4 • , 0.4 100 1000 0.0050 0.0155 2, ,5544 0.8741 0.0105 2.3248 0.0154 0.0126: . 0.4 0.4 101 1010 0.0040 0.0124 2.5668 0.8825 0.0084 2.3372 0.0123 0.0101 0.3 0.3 102, 1020 0.0040 0.0124 "2.5792 0.8909 0.0084 2.3495 0.0123. 0.0101 0.3 0.3 103 .1030 .0.0040 0.0124 2:5916 0.8994 0.0085 2.3618 0.0123 0.0101 .0.3• 0.3 . 104, 1040 0.0040 0.0124 2.6040 0.9078 0.0085 2.3742. 0.0123 0.0101 0.3 0.3 105 1650 0.0040 0.0124' ' 2,6164 -0.9163 0.0085 2.3865 .0.0123 0.0101 0.3 0.3 106 1060 0.0040 0.0124 2.6288 0.9249 0.0085' 2.3988 0.0123 0.0101' 0.3 ' 0.3 ` 107 1070 0.0040 0.0124 2.6412 ' 0.9334 • 0.0085' 2.4112 : 0.0123 0.0102. 0.3 ' 0.3 108 1080' 0.0040 ' 0.0124 ' 2.6536 0.9419 0.0086 2:4235 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 '0.3 109 1090 0.0040 0.0124 2.6660 0.9505 0.0086 2.4358 0.623, 0.0102 0.3 0.3 • 110 1100 , 0.0040 ''0.0124 2.6784 0.9591 0.0086 2.4482 0.0123. 0:0102 0.3 0.3 111 1110 0.0040 0.0124 2.6908 0.9677 0.0086 2.4605 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 112 1120 0.0040 0.0124 2.7032; 0.9764 0.0086• 2.4728. 0.0123' 0.0102 .0.3 0.3 113 , 1130 0.0040 0.0124 2.7156 0.9850 0.0087 2.4852 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 114 1140 " 0.0040. 0.0124 2.7280 0.9937 0.0087 2.4975 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 , 115 1150 0.0040 0.0124 ' 2.7404 1.0024 0.0087 2.5098 0.0123 . 0.0102 0.3 0.3 116 .1160 0'.0040 0.0124 2.7528 1.0111. 0:0087 2.5222 0.0123 ' 0.0103 0.3 0.3 117 1170 0.0040' 0.0124 2.7652 1.0198 0.0087 2:5345 ' 0.0123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 118 1180 ' .0.0040' 0.0124 ' 2.7776 ' 1.0286 0.0087 2.5469-.0.0123 0.0103 0.3 ' 0.3' 119 1190, 0.0040 0.0124 2.7900 1.0373 .6.0088 2.5592 0.6123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 120 1200 0.0040 0.0124, 2.8024 „ 1.0461 0.0088 2.5715 0.0123'' 0.0103 0.3 0.3 121 1210 0.0040 0.0124, 2.8148 1.0549 0.0088 2.5839 . 0.0123. 0.0103 0.3 6.3 122. 1220, 0.0040 0.0124 2.8272. ` 1.0637 0.0088 2.5962, 0:0123 0.0103 0.3 ' ~ 0.3 123 1230 - 0.0040 0.0124 ' 2.8396 1_0726 : 0.0088 2.6086 6.0123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 124 1240 0:0040 ' 0.0124 2.8520• 1.0814. 0.0089 2.6209. 0.0123 0.0103' '6.3 -0.3 125 1250 . 0.0040 •0.0124 2.8644 1.0903'. 0.0089 2.6333 0.0123 0.0104,' 0:3 0.3 126 1260 0.0040 0.6124 2.8768 -1.0992 0.0089 2.6456 0.0123` 0.0104 0.3 0.3 127 1270 0.0040 0.0124 2.8892 ` 1.1081 0.0089 2.6579 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 128 1280 •0.0040 6.0124 2.9016 ' 1.1170 0.0089 2.6703. 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 129 '1290 0.0640 0.0124 2.9140 1.1260 0.0089 2.6826 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 130 1306 0.0040 0.0124 2.9264. ' • 1.1349 0.0090 4.6950 0.0123 ! 0.0104 0.3, 6.3 131 1310 0.0040 0.0124, 219388 1.1439 0.0090 _ 2.7073 0.0123 ? 0.0104 0.3 ,:0.3 • 132 1320 6.0040 .0.0124• 2.9512 1.1529 0.0090 , 2.7197 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 133 1330 0.0040 0.0124 2.9636 1.1619 0.0090• 2.7320- 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 134 1340 0.0040 0.0124 2.9760 1:1709 0.0090 2.7444 0.0123 0.0104 .0.3 0.3 135 1350. 0.0040 0.0124 2.9884 1.1860 0.0090 2.7567 0.0123 0.0105 0.3 0.3 136 1360 , 0.0040 0.0124 3.0008 1.1891• 0.0091 `2.7691 0.0123 0.0105 0.3 0.3 137 1370 0.0040, 0.0124 10132 1.1981 0.0091 2.7814 0.0123 0.0105 0.3 0.3 138 1380 0.0040 ' 0.0124 3.0256 1.2072 0.0091 2.7938 0.0123 0.0105 03 0.3 139 1390 , . 0.6040 , 0.0124 3.0380 1.2163 0.0091 2.8061 0.0123 0.0105 0.3 0.3 140 1400 0.0040 0;0124 3.0504 1.2254 0.0091 ' 2.8185 0.0123 0.0105 0.3' 0.3 141 1410 'O.0040' . 0.0124 3.0628 1.2346 0.0091. .2.8308 0:0124 0.0105 6.3 0.3 142 1420 0.0040 0.0124 3.0752 1.2437 0.0092. 2.8432 0.0124 0.0105 0:3` 0.3 143 1430 0.0040 0.0124 3.0876 1.2529 0.0092 2.8555 ' 0.0124 0.0105 0.3 0.3 144 1440 0.0040. 0.0124., 3.1000 1.2621 0.0092 2.8679. 0.0124 0.6105- 0.3 0.3 Total 1.0000 3.1000= • , , • , Hydrograph Volume 32586 (Cubic Feet) • File: SBUH-24-post5.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 C ES NW Project: Tigard Baptist'Church Project Number: 1845 SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 2111105 SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Basin: Site Event: 10-year post Given: Area = 4:64 acres Pt 3.45 inches - dt = 10 min. Tc = 12 min. w = 0.2941 routing constant Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Area = 2.66 acres Area = 1.98 acres Peak Runoff: 2.4 cfs CN = 79 CN = 98' Total Vol.: 37624 cf S = 2.66 S 0.20 0.2S = 0.53 0.2S 0.04 Peak Runoff Hydrograph 3.0 :i gilt !i ._I i 1 7- ' i i ! i ~ I 2.0 III , , ! v _ I 1.5 i! I t i I I ! i ! r t' 1.0 , ! 0.5 -1~- - --i-~ - I - I _ ! I : I I ) ' I f 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1.000' 1200 1400 1600 Time in Minutes File: SBUH-24-postl0.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, InC. Pagel " Pervious Area Impervious Aiea (1) (2). (3) (4), (5) (6) (7) (8) (gj (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu-' Incre Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro= ment bution Rainfall Rainfall ; Runoff Runoff Runoff " Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (Cfs) (Cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0138 . 0.0138 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0138 0.0276 ;,0;0000. 0.0000• ..0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0138' 0.0414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0600 0:0000 0.0000 0.0 6.0 • 4, 40 0.0040 0.0138 0.0552. ' 0.0000 0.0000. 0.0009 • 0;0009 '0.0004 0.0 0.0 . 5 ' 50 0:0040 0.0138 0.0690. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0034 0.0025 0.0011 0.0 0.0 6. 60 .0.0040 0.0138 0.0828 0.0000 0.0000' 0.00721 0.00Y 0.0016 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 6.0138 0.0966 0.0006 0:0000 0.6120 0.0048 0.0021 0.1 0.0 8 80 b.0040' 0.0138 0.1104 0.0000 0.0000 .10.0177 0.0057 0.0024 0.1 0:1 9 90 0.0040 0.0138 0.1242 0;0000 0.0000 0.0242 0.0065 0.0028 0.1 0.1 '10 100 0.0040 0.0138- 0.1380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0313 0.0072 0.0031 .0.1 0:1 11 110 0.0050 .0.0173 0.1553 0:0000 0.0000 0.0411 0.0098 0.0042 0.1 0.1 12 120 0:0050 ' ,0.0173 0.1725 0.0000 0.0000 0.0516 0.0105 0.0045 0.1 0.1 13 130 0.0050 0.0173 0.1898' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0628 0.0112 .0.0048 0.1 0.1 14' 140 0.0650 0.6173 '0.2070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0746 0:0118 0.0050' •010.1' 15 , , . 150 0.0050 0.0173 0.2243 0.0000 0.0000 0.0868 0.0122 .0.0052 0.1 0.1 16 160 0.0050 0.0173 0.2415 0.0000 0.0000 0.0995 0.0127 0.0054 0.2 0.1 17 170 0.0060 0.0207 0.2622 0.0000 0.0000 0:1152 0.0157' 0.0067 0.2 0.2 18 180 0.0060 0.0207 ' 0.2829 0.0000 0.0000 0.1314 , . 0.0162 • 0.0069 0.2 0.2 19 190 0.0080 0.0207 0.3036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1479 ' 0.0166 0.0071 0.2 0.2 20 200 0.0060 0.0207' 0.3243 0:0000 0.0000 0.1648 0.0169 ` 0.0072 0.2 0.2 21 210 0.0060 0.0207 0.3450 0.0000 10;0000 - 0.1820 _ 0.6172 0.0073 0.2 0.2 22 220 010060. 0.0207. 0.3657 0.0000 0.0000 0.1995 0.0175 0.0075 0.2 0.2 23. .230 0.0070 0.0242 0.3899.'' ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.2203 0.0207. 0.0088 0.2' 0.2 24 240 0.0070 0.0242 0.4146 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.2413 0.0210 0.0090 0.3- 0:2 25 250 0.0070 0.0242 0.4382. 0.0000 0.0000 " 0.2625 0.0213 0.0091 '0.3 0.2 , 26 260 0.0070 0.0242 0.4623 0.0000 0.0000 0.2846 , 0.0215. 0.0092 0.3 0.3 27 270 0.0070' 0.0242 0.4865 0.0000 0.0000 0.3057,' . 0:0217, 0.0092 ' 0.3 0.3 28 280 0.0070 0.0242 0.5106 0.0000 0.0000 0.3275 0.0219 0.0093 0.3 0.3. 29 290 0.0082 0.0283 0.5389 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.3533 0.0258 0:0110 0.3 . 0.3 ± 30 . 300 0.0082 0.0283 0.5672 0.0005 0.0004 0.3793 0.0260 •0.6113 04 0.3 31 310 0.0082 0.0283. 0.5955 0.0015 0.0010 - 0.4055 0.0262 0.0118 0.3 -0.3. 32 320 0.0082 0.0283 ' 0.6238 0.0031 0.0016 0.4318 0.0263 0.0121_. . 0.3 0.3 33 330 0,0082 6.0283 0.6521 0.0052 0.0021 0.4582 0.0265 0.0125 0.4 0.3 34 340 0.0082. 0.0283' 0.6803 0.0679 0.0027 0.4848 0.0266 0.0129 0.4 0.3. 35 350 0.0095 0.0328 0.7131 0.0116 0.0037 0.5157 0.0309 0.0153 0.4 0.4 -'36 360 0.0095. 0.0328 0.7459 0:0160 0.0044 0.5468 0.0311 0.0158 0.4 ' 0.4 37 370 0.0095 0.0328\ 0.7787 0.0210 0:0050 ' 0.5780' 0.0312• 0.0162. 0.5 0.4, 38 380 0.0095 0.0328 0.8114 0.0266 0.0056 0.6693 '0.0313 0.0166 0.5 0.4 39 390 '0.0095 0.0328 0.8442 0.0329 • 0.0062 0.6407 .0.0314 0.0170 0.5 0.5 40 400 0.0095 0.0328 0.8770 ' 0.0397 '0.0068 0.6721 0.0315. 0.0173 0.5 0.5 4.41 410 0.0134 0.0462 0.9232 0.0503 0.0106 0.7167 0.0445 0.0251 0.7 0.5 42 420 0.0134 0.0462 0.9695 0.0619 0.0116 0.7613 0.0447 0.0257 0.7 6.6' 43 430 0.0134 0.0462 1.0157 0.0746 0.0127' 0.8061 0:0448 0.0264 0.7 0.7 44 440 0.0180 0.0621 1.0778 0:0931 0.6185' .0.8664 0.0603 0.0364 1.0 0.8 45 450 0.0180 6.0621 1.1399 0.1133 • 0.0202 0.9269. 6.0605 ' . 0.0374 1.0 0.9 46 460 0.0340 0.1173 1.2572 0.1556 0.0423 1.0416 0.1147 0.0732 2.1 1.3 47 470 .0.0540 0.1863 1.4435 ' 0.2329 0.0773, 1.2245 . 0.1829 0.1224 3.4 2.1 48 480 0.0270 0.0932 L5366 •0.2757 6.0428 1.3162 0.0917 0.0637' 1.8 2.4 49 490 0.0180 0.0621 1.5987 0.3057 .0.0299, 13775 0.0612 0:0433 1.2 - 1.9 50 500 0.0134 0.0462 1.6450 0.3286 0.0230 1.4231 0.0456 0.0326 •0.9 1.4 51 510 ` 0.0134 , .0.0462. 1.6912 0.3522 0.0235 1.4688 0.0457 0.0330 . 0.9 1,1 52 "520 0.0134 0.0462 1.7374 0.3763 0.0241 1.5144 0.0457 6.0333 0.9 1.0 ` 53 530 0.0088 0.0304 1.7678 - 0.3924 0,0161 '1.5445 0.0300 0.0220 0.6 0.9 54 540• 0.0088 0.0304 1.7981 0.4087 0.0163 •1.5745 0.0300 0.0222 0.6 0.7 55 550. 0.0088 0.0304 1.8285. 0.4252 0.0165 1.6045 `0.0300 0.0223 0.6 0.7 56 560 0.6088 0.0304 1.8589 0.4420 0.0168. 1.6346 0.0300' - 0.0224 0.6- 0.6 57 570 0.0088- 0.0304 1.8892 0.4589 0.0170 1.6646 .0.0301, 0.0225 0.6 0.6 " 58 580 0.0088 ' 0:0304 1.9196 0.4761 0.0172 1.6947 0.0301 .i. 0.0227 :0.6 0.6 59 590 0.0088 0.0304 1.9499 0.4934 0.0174 1.7248. 0.0301 ' 0.0228 6.6 0.6' 60 600 0.0088 0:0304 1.9803 0.5110 0.0175 1.7548 0.0301 0.0229 .10.6 0.6 61 .610 0.0088 0.0304 2.0107 0.5287 0.0177 1.7849 0:0301. 0.0230 0.6, 0.6 ' 62 620 0.0088 0.0304 2.0410 10.5466 0.0179 1.8150. 0.0301' 0.0231 0.6'. 0.6. 63. 630 0.0088 0.0304 2.0714 0.5647 0.0181' 1.8451 0.0301 0.0232 0:7 0.6 64 646 0.0088' 0.0304, 2.1017 - 0.5830 0:0183 1.8752 0.0301 0.0233 0.7 0.7 65 650 0.0072 ` 0.0248. 2.1266 0.5981 0.0151 1.8999 0:0246,. 0.0192 , 0.5 0.6 66 660 0.0072 0.0248 2.1514 0.6133: 0.0152 1.9245 0:0246 0.0192 '0.5 0.6 67 670 0.0072 0.0248' 2.1763 0.6286 0.0153 ,1.9492 0.0246 0.0193 0.5 0.6 68 680 0.0072 0.0248 2.2011 0.6440 0:0154 1:9738 0.0247 0.0194 0.5 0:5 69- 690 - 0.6072 ` 0.0246, 2.2259 0.6595 0.0155 1:9985 , 0.0247 0.0194 0.5 0.5 70 700 0.0072. 6.0248 2.2508 0.6752 0.0156 2.0231. 0.0247 0.0195 0.5.' 0.5 71 .7110 0.0072 0.0248 2.2756 0:6909 • , 0.0157 2.0478 0.0247 09195 , 0.5 0.5 File: SBUH-24-posllO.XLS + t, 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)• (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall . Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0248 2.3005. 0.7067 0.6-58 2.0725 0.0241 0.0196 0.6 0.5 73 .730 0.0072 0.0248 2.3253 0.7227 0.0159 2.0971 0.0247 0.0197 0.6 0.6 74 740 0.0072 0.0248 2.3501 0.7387 0.0160 2.1218 0.0247 0.0197 0.6 0.6 75 750 0.0072 0.0248 2.3750 0.7548 0.0161 2.1465 0.0247 0.0198 0.6 0.6 76 760 0.0072 0.0248 2.3998 0.7710 0.0162 2.1712 0.0247 0.0198 0.6 0.6 77 770 0.0057 0.0197 2.4195 0.7840 0.0129 2.1907 0.0195 0.0157 0.4 0.5 78 780 0.0057 0.0197 2.4392 0.7969 0.0130 2.2103 0.0195 0.0158 0.4 0.5 79 790 0.0057 0.0197 2.4588 0.8100 0.0130 2:2298 0.0195 0.0158 0.4 0.5 80 800 0.0057• 0.0197 2.4785 0.8230 0.0131 2.2493 0.0195. 0.0158 0.4 0.4 81 810 0.0057 0.0197 2.4981 0.8362 0.0131 2.2689 6.0195 0.0159 0.4 0.4 82 820 0.0057 0.0197 2.5178 0.8494 0.0132 2.2884 0.0196 ' 0.0159 0.4 0.4 83 830 0.0057 0.0197 2.5375 0.8626 0.0133 2.3080 0.0196 0.0159' 0.4 0.4 84 840 0.0057 0.0197 ' 2.5571 0.8759 0.0133 2.3276 0.0196 0.0160 0.4 0.4 85 850 0.0057 0.0197 2.5768 0.8893 0.0134 2.3471 0.0196 0.0160 0.4 0.4 86 860 0.0057 0.0197 2.5965 0.9027 0.0134 2.3667 0.0196 0.0160 0.5 0.4 87 870 0.0057 0.0197 2.6161 0.9162 0.0135 2.3862 0.0196 0.0161 0.5 0.4 88 880 0.0057 0.0197 2.6358 0.9297 0.0135 2.4058 0.0196 0.0161 0.5 0.5 89 890 0.0050 '0.0173 2.6531 0.9416 0.0119 2.4229 0.0172 0.0141 0.4 0.4 90 900 0.0050 0.0173 2.6703 0.9535 0.0119 2.4401 0.0172 0.0142 0.4 0.4 91 916 0.0050 0.0173 2.6876 0.9655 0.0120 2.4573 0.0172 0.0142 0.4 0.4 92 920 0.0050 0.0173 2.7048 0.9775 0.0120 2.4744 0.0172 0.0142 0.4 0.4 93 930 0.0050 0.0173 2.7221 0.9895 0.0120 2.4916 0.0172 0.0142 0.4 0.4 94 940 0.0050 0.0173 2.7393 1.0016' 0.0121 2.5088 0.0172 0.0143 0.4 0.4 95 950 0.0050 0.0173 2.7566 1.0137' 0.0121 2.5259 0.0172 0.0143 0.4 0.4 96 960 0.0050 0.0173 2.7738 1.0259 0.0122 2.5431, 0.0172 0.0143 0.4 0.4 97 970 0.0050 0.0173 2.7911 1.0381 0.0122 2.5602 0.0172 0.0143 0.4 0.4 98 980 0.0050 0.0173 2.8083 1.0503 0.0122 2.5774 0.0172 0.0143 0.4 OX 99 990 0.0050 0.0173 2.8256 1.0626 0.0123 2.5946 0.0172 0.0144 0.4 0.4 100 1000 0.0050 0.0173 2.8428 1.0749 0.0123 2.6118 0.0172 0.0144' 0.4 0.4 101 1010 0.0040 0.0138 2.8566 1.0847 0.0099 2.6255 0.0137 0.0115 0.3 0.4 102 1020 0.0040 0.0138. 2.8704 1.0946 0.0099 2.6392 0.0137 0.0115 0.3 0.3 103 1030 0.0040 0.0138 .2.8842. 1.1045 0.0099 2.6530 0.0137 0.0115 6.3 0.3 104 1040 0.0040 0.0138 2.8980 1.1144 0.6099 2.6667 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 105' 1050 0.0040 0.0138 2.9118 1.1244 0.0099 2.6804 0.0137. 0.0116 0.3 0.3 106 1060 0.0040 0.0138 2.9256 " 1.1344 0.0100 2.6942 . ` 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 107 1070 0.0040 0.0138 2.9394 1.1444 0.0100 2.7079 0.0137 '0.0116 0.3 0.3 108 1080 0.0040 0.0138 2.9532 1.1544 0.0100 2.7217 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 109 1090 0.0040 0.0138 2.9670 1.1644 0.0100 2.7354 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 110 1100 0.0040 0.0138 2.9808 1.1744 0.0101 2.7491 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 03 111 1110 0.0040 0.0138 2.9946 1.1845 0.0101 2.7629 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 112 1120. 0.0040 0.0138 3.0084 1.1946 0.0101 2.7766 0.0137 -0.0116 0.3 0.3 113 1130 0.0040 0.0138 3.0222 1.2047 0.0101 2.7804 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 114 1140 0.0040 0.0138 3.0360 1.2149 0.0101 2.8041 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 115 , 1150 0.0040 '0.0138 3.0498 1.2250 0.0102 2.8179 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 116 1160 0.0040 0.0138 3.0636 1.2352 •0.0102 2.8316 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 117 1170 0.0040 0.0138 3.0774 1.2454 0.0102 2.8454 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 118 1180 0.0040 0.0138 3.0912 1.2556 0.0102 2.8591 0.0137. 0.0117 0.3 0.3 119 1190 -0.0040 0.0138 3.1050 1.2658 0.0102 2.8728 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 120 1200 0.0040 0.0138 3.1188 1.2760 0.0102 2.8866 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 121 1210 0.0040 0.0138 3.1326. 1.2863 0.0103 2.9003 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 122 1220 0.0040 . 0.0138 3.1464 1.2966 0.0103 2.9141 ' 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 123 1230 0.0040 0.0138 3.1602 1.3069 '0.0103 2.9278 0.0137 0.0118. 0.3 0.3 124. 1240 0.0040 0.0138 3.1740 1.3172 0.0103 2.9416 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 125 1250 0.0040 0.0138 3.1878 1.3276 0.0103 2.9553 ' 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 126 1260 0.0040 0.0138 3.2016 1.3379 0.0104 2.9691 _ 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 127 1270 0.0040 0.0138 3.2154 1.3483 0.0104 2.9828 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 128 1280 0.0040 0.0138 3.2292 1.3587 0.0104 2.9966 , 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 129 1290 0.0040 0.0138 3.2430 1.3691 0.0104 3.0103 0.0138 0.0118 0.3 0.3 130 1300 0.0040 0.0138 3.2568 1.3795 0.0104 3.0241 0.0138 0.0118 0.3 0.3 131 1310 0.0040 0.0138 3.2706 1:3900 0.0104 3.0378 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 132 1320 0.0040 0.0138 3.2844 1.4004 0.0105 3.0516 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 133 1330 0.0040 0.0138 3.2982 1.4109 0.0105.-: 3.0653 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 134 1340 0.0040 0.0138 3.3120 1.4214 0.0105 3.0791,, 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 135 1350 0.0040 0.0138 3.3258 1'.4319. 0.0105 3.0928 •0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3' 136 1360 0.0040 0.0138 3:3396 1.4424 0.0105 3.1066 0:0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 137 1370 0.0040 0.0138 3.3534 1.4530 0.0105 3.1203 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 138 1380 0.0040 0.0138 3.3672 1.4635 0.0106 3.1341 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 139 1390 0.0040 0.0138 .3.3810 1.4741 0.0106 3.1479 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 140 1400 0.0040 0.0138 3.3948 1.4847 0.0106 3.1616 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 141 1410 0.0040 0.0138 14086 1.4953 0.0106 3.1754 0.0138 0.0120 0.3 0.3 142. 1420 0.0040 0.0138 3.4224 1.5059 0.01.06 3.1891' 0.0138 0.0120 0.3 0.3 143 1430 6.0040 0.0138 3.4362 1.5166 0.0106 3.2029 0.0138 0.0120 0.3 0.3 144 1440 '0.0040 .0.0138 3.4500 1.5272 0.0107 3.2166 0.0138 0.0120 0.3 0.3 Total 1.0000 3.4500 Hydrograph Volume 37624 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-postlO.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 ES. NW C Project: Tigard Baptist Church Project Number: 1845 SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 2/11/05 SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION ; Basin: Site Event' 25=year post Given: Area = 4.64 acres Pt = 3.9 inches. dt . = 10 min. Tc = 11. min. w, = 0.3125 routing. constant Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Area 2.66 acres: Area = •,,.1.98 acres Peak Runoff: 2.9•cfs CN = 79 CN. 98 _ Total Vol.: 44266 cf. S = 1.!66 S' ..0.20 0:53 .0.2S = 0.04 Peak Runoff'Hydrograph 35 t rI - 3.0-' - i t I ] I- f - -E- _ ! ! i 2.5 y i i ! i i ( I 2.0 U C i I r # f 3 I: I - - - 1.5 - T- i r ! I t... a.. i 1.0 - T--- r-- - - - i r € ._I. : i i - . 0.5 - - - - 1 t i. _ I 0.0 0., 200 400 600 800 1000 '1200. ',1400" 1600 Time in. Minutes File: SBUH-24-POSP5:XLS 2/11/2005. CESiNW, lnc. Page 1 Pervious Area Impervious Area ' (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) . i. (6) (7) (8) (9)- (10) (11) (12). Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu-. Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0156 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0156 0.0312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0156 0.0468 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0156 0.0624. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0021 0.0019 ' 0.0008 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0156 0.0780 0.0000 0.0000. 0.0057 0:0037 0.0016 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0156 0.0936 0.0000 0.0000. 0.0108 0.0051 0.0022. 0.1 . 0.0 7 70 .0.0040 0.0156 0.1092 0.0000 0.0000 0.0172 0.0063 0.0027 0.1 0.1 8 80 0.0040 0.0156 0.1248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0245 0.0073 0.0031 0.1 ' 0.1 9 90 0.0040 0.0156 0.1404 0.0000 0.0000 0.0327 .0.0082 0.0035 0.1 0.1 10 100 0.0040 0.0156 ' 0.1560 0.0000 0.0000 0.0416 0.0089 0.0038 0.1 0.1 11 110 0.0050 0.0195 0.1755 0.0000 0.0000 0.0535 0.0120 0.0051 0.1 0.1 12 120 0.0050 0.0195 0.1950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0664 ' 0.0128 0.0055 0.2 0.1 13 130 0.0050. 0.0195 0.2145 0.0000 0.0000 0.0799 0.0135 0.0058 0.2 0.1 14 140 0.0050 0.0195 0.2340 0.0000 0.0000 0.0939 0.0141 0.0060 0.2 0.2 15 150 .0.0050 0.0195 0.2535 0.0000 0.0000 0.1085; 0.0146 0.0062 0.2 0.2 16 160 0.0050 0.0195 0.2730 0.0000 0.0000 0.1236 0.0150 0.0064 0.2 0.2 17 170 0.0060 0.0234 0.2964 0.0000 0.0000 0.1421 0.0185 0.0079 0.2 0.2 18 180 0.0060 0.0234 0.3198 0.0000 0.0000 0.1611 0.0190 0.0081 0.2 0.2 ' 19 190 0.0060 0.0234 0.3432 0.0000 0.0000 0.1805 0.0194 0.0083 0.2 0.2 20 200 0.0060 0.0234 0.3666 0.0000 0:0000 '0.2003 0.0198 0.0084 0.2 0.2 21 210 0.0060 0.0234 0.3900 '0.0000 0.0000 0.2204 0.0201 0.0086 0.2 0.2 22 220 0.0060 0.0234 0.4134 0.0000 0.0000 0.2407 0.0203 0.0087 0.2 0.2 23 230 0.0070. 0.0273 0.4407 '0.0000 0.0000' 0.2648 0.0240 0.0103 0.3 0.3 24 240 0.0070 0.0273 0.4680 0.0000 0.0000 ,0.2891 0.0243 0.0104 0.3 0.3 25 250 0.0070 0.0273 0.4953 0.0000 0.0000 0:3136 0.0246. 0.0105 0.3 0.3 26 260 0.0070 0.0273 0.5226 0.0000 0.0000 0.3384 0.0248 0.0106 0.3 0.3 27 270 0.0070 0.0273 0.5499 0.0001 0.0001 0.3634 0.0250. 0.0107 .0.3 0.3 28 280 0.0070 0.0273 0.5772 0.0008 .0.0006 0.3885 0.0251 10.0111 0.3 0.3 29 290 0.0082 0.0320 0.6092 0.0022 0.0014 0.4182 0:0297 0.0135 0.4 0.3 30 300 0.0082 0.0320 0.6412 0.0043 0.0021, 0.4480 0.0298 0.0140 0.4 0.4 31 310 0.0082 0.0320 0.6731 0.0072 0.0028 0.4780 0.0300 10.0144 0.4 0.4 32 320 0.0082 0.0320 0.7051 0.0106 0.0035 0.5082 0.0301 0.0149 0.4 0.4 33 330 0.0082 0.0320 0.7371 0.0147 0.0041 0.5385 0.0303 0.0153 0.4 0.4 34 340 0.0082 0.0320 0.7691 0.0195 0.0047 -0.5689 0.0304 0.0157 0.4 0.4 35 350 0.0095 0.0371 0.8061 0.0257 0.0062 0.6042 0.0353 0.0186 0.5 0.5 36 360 6.0095 0.0371 0.8432 0.0327 0.0070 0.6397 0.0355- 0.0191 0.5 0.5 37 370 0.0095. 0.0371 0.8802 0.0404 0.0077 0.6752 0.0356 0.0196 0.6 0.5 38 380 0.0095 0.0371 0.9173 0.0489 0.0084 0.7109 0.0357 • 0.0201 0.6 0.5 39 390 0.0095 0:0371 0.9543 0.0580 0.0091 0.7467 0.0358 0.0205 0.6 0.6 40 400 0.0095 0.0371 0.9914 0.0678 0.0098. 0.7826 0.0359 0.0209 0.6 0.6 41 410 0.0134 0.0523 1.0436 0.0827 0.0149 0.8333 0.0507 0.0302 0.8 0.7 42 420 0.0134 0.0523 1.0959 0.0988 0.0161 0.8841 0.0508 0.0309 0.9 0.8 43 430 0.0134 0.0523 1.1482 0.1161 0.0173 0.9350 0.0509 0.0316 0.9 0.8 44 440 0.0180 0.0702 1.2184 0.1410, 0.0249 1.0036 0.0686 0.0436 1.2 1.0 45 450 0.0180 0.0702 1.2886 0.1678 0.0268 1.0723 0.0687 0.0447 1.3 1.1 46 460 0.0340 0.1326 1.4212 0.2230 0.0553 1.2025. 0.1302 •0.0872 2.4 1.6 47 470 0.0540 0.2106 1.6318 0.3220 0.0990 1.4101 0.2075 .0.1453 4.1 2.6 48 480 0.0270 0.1053 1.7371 0.3761 0.0541 1.5141. 0.1040 0.0754 2.1 2.9 49 490, 0.0180 0.0702 1.8073 0.4136 0.0376 1.5835 - 0.0694 0.0512 1.4 2.2 50 500 0.0134 0.0523 1.8595 0.4423 0.0287 1.6352 0.0517. 0.0385 1.1 1.6 51 510 0.0134 0.0523 1.9118 0.4717 0.0293 1.6870 0.0517 0.0389 1.1 1.3 52 520 0.0134 0.0523 1.9640 0.5016 0.0299' 1.7387 0.0518 0.0392 1.1 1.2 53 530 0.0088 0.0343 1.9984 0.5215 0.0199 1.7727 0.0340 0.0259 0.7• 1.0, 54 540 0.0088 0.0343 2.0327 0.5417 0.0202 1.8067 ' 0.0340 0.0261 0.7 0.8 55 550 0.0088 0.0343 2.0670 0.5621 0.0204 1.8408 0.0340 0.0262 0.7 0.8 56 560 0.0088 0.0343 2.1013 0.5828 • 0.0206 1.8748 .0-0340 0.0264 0.7 ' 0.8 57 570 0.0088. 0.0343 2.1356 0.6036 0.0209 1.8089 , 0.0340. 0.0265 0.7 0.7 58 580 0.0088 0.0343 2.1700 0.6247 0:0211 1.9429' . 0.0341 0.0266 0.7 0.7 59, 590 0.0088 0.0343 2.2043 0.6460 0.0213 .1.9770. 0.0341 . 0.0267 0.8 0.7 60 600 0.0088 0.0343 2.2386 0.6675 0.0215 2.0110 0.0341 0.0269 0.8 0.8 61 610 0.0088 0.0343 2.2729 . 0.6892 0.0217 2.0451 0.0341 0.0270 0.8 0.8 62 620 0.0088 0.0343 2.3072 0.7111 0.0219 2.6792 0.0341 0.0271 0.8 0.8 63 630 0.0088 0.0343 2.3416 0.7331 '0.0221 2.1133 0.0341 0.0272 ' 0.8 0.8 64 640 0.0088 0.0343 2.3759. 0.7554 0.0223 2.1474 0.0341 0.0273 0.8 0.8 65 650 0.0072 0.0281 2.4040 0.7738 0.0184 2.1753 0.0279 0.0224 . 0.6 0.7 66 660 0.0072 0.0281 2.4320 '03922 0.0185 2.2032 0.0279 0.0225 0.6 0.7 67 670 0.0072 0.0281 2:4601 0.8108 0.0186 2.2311 • 0.0279 0.0226 0.6 0.6 68 680 0.0072 0.0281 2.4882. 0.8295 0.0187 2.2590 0.0279 0.0226 0.6 0.6 69 690 0.0072 '0.0281 2.5163 0.8484 0.0188: 2.2869 .0.0279 0.0227 0.6 0.6 70 700 0.0072 0.0281' 2.5444 0.8673 0.0189 2.3148 0.0279 0.0228 0.6 0.6 71 710 0.0072 0.0281 2.5724 0.8863 0.0190 2.3428 0.0279 ' 0.0228 0.6 0.6 File: SBUH-24-post25.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc.. Page 2 (1)• (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) _ (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0281 2.6005 0.9055 0:0191 2.3707, 0.0279 0.0229 0.6 0.6 73 730 0.0072 0.0281 2.6286 0.9247 0.0193 2.3986 0.0279 0.0230 0.6 0.6 74 740 '0.0072 0.0281 2.6567 0.9441 0.0194 2.4266 0.0279. 0.0230 0.6 0.6 75 750 0.0072 0.0281 2.6848 0.9635 0.0195 2.4545 0.0279 0.0231 0.6 0.6 76 760 0.0072 0.0281 2.7128 0.9831 0.0196 2.4824 0.0279 6.0231 0.6 0.6 77 770 0.0057 0.0222 2.7351 0.9986 0.0156 2.5045 0.0221 0.0184 0.5 0.6 78 780 0.0057 0.0222 2.7573 1.0143 0.0156 2.5267 0.0221 0.0184 0.5 0.5 79 790 0.0057 0.0222 2.7795 1.0299 0.0157 2.5488 0.0221 0.0184 0.5 0.5 80 806 0.0057 0.0222 2.8018 1.0457 0.0157 2.5709 0.0221 0.0185 0.5. 0.5 81 810 0.0057 0.0222 2.8240 1.0615 0.0158 2.5930 • 0.0221 0.0185 0.5 0.5 82 820 0.0057 0.0222 2:8462 .1.0773 0.0158 2.6152 0.0221 0.0185 0.5 0.5 83 830 0.0057' 0.0222 2.8685 1.0932 0.0159 2.6373 0.0221 0.0186 0.5 0.5 _ 84 840 0.0057 0.0222 2.8907 1.1092 0.0160 2.6594 0.0221 0.0186 0.5 0.5 65 850 0.0057 0.0222 2.9129 1.1252 0:0160. 2.6816-., 0.0221 0.0186 0.5 0.5 86 860 0.0057 0.0222 2.9351 1.1413 0.0161 2.7037 •0.0221 0.0187 0.5 0.5 ' 87 • 870 ' 0.0057 0.0222 2.9574 1.1574 0.0161 2.7258 0.0221 0.0187 0.5 0.5 88 880 0.0057 0.0222 2.9796 1.1736 0.0162 2.7480 0.0221 0.0187 0.5 0.5 89 890 '0.0050 0.0195 2.9991 1.1878 0.0142 2.7674 0.0194 0.0164 0.5 0.5 90 .900 0.0050 0.0195 3.0186 - 1.2021 0.0143 2.7868 0.0194 0.0165 0.5 0.5 91 910 0.0050 0.0195' 3.0381 1.2164 0.0143 2.8062 0.0194 0.0165 0.5 0:5 92 920 0.0050 0.0195 3.0576 1.2308 0.0144 2.8256 0.0194 0.0165 0.5 0.5 93 930 0.0050 0.0195 3.0771 1.2451 0.0144 2.8451 0.0194 0.0165 0.5 0.5 94 940 0.0050 0.0195 3.0966 1.2596 0.0144 2.8645 0.0194 0.0166 0.5 0.5 95 950 0.0050 0.0195 3.1161 1.2740 0.0145 2.8839 0.0194 0.0166 0.5 0.5 96 960 0.0050 0.0195 3.1356 1.2885 0.0145 2.9033 0.0194 0.0166 0:5 0.5 97 970 0.0050' 0.0195 3.1551 1.3031 0.0145 2.9228 0.0194 0.0166 0.5 0.5 98 980 0.0050 0.0195 3.1746 1.3177 0.0146 2.9422 0.0194 0.0166 0.5 0.5 99 990 0.0050 0.0195 3.1941 1.3323 0.0146 2.9616 0.0194 0.0167 0.5 0.5 100 1000 0.0050 0.0195 '3.2136 1.3469 0.0147 2.9810 " 0.0194 0.0167 0.5 0.5 101. 1010 0.0040 0.0156 3.2292 1.3587 0.0117 2.9966 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 102 1020 0.0040 0.0156 3.2448 1.3704 0.0118 3.0121 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 103 1030 0.0040 0.0156 3.2604 1.3822 0.0118 3.0277 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 104 1040 0.0040 0.0156 3.2760 1.3941 0.0118 3.0432 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 04 105 1050 0.0040 0.0156 3.2916 1.4059 0.0118 3.0588 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 106 1060 0.0040 0.0156 3.3072 1.4177 0.0119 3.0743 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 107 1070 0.0040 0.0156 3.3228 1.4296. 0.0119 3.0898 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 108 1080 0.0040 0.0156 3.3384 • 1.4415 0.0119 3.1054 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 109 11090 0.0040 0.0156 3.3540 1.4534 0.0119 3.1209 0.0155. 0.0135 0.4 0.4 110 1100 0.0040• . 0.0156 3.3696 1.4654 0.0119 3.1365 ' 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 074 1,11 1110 0.0040 0.0156 3.3852 1.4773 0.0120 3.1520 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 .112 1120 0.0040 0.0156 3.4008 1.4893 0.0120 3.1676. ; 0.0155 0.6135 0.4 0.4 113 1130 0.0040 • 0.0156 3.4 1.5013 0.0120 3.1831 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 114 1140 0.0040 0.0156 3.4320 ' 1.5133 0.0120 ' 3.1987 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 115 1150' 0.0640 0.0156 3.4476 1.5254 0.0120 3.2142 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 116 1160 0.0040• 0.0156 3.4632 1.5375 0.0121 3.2298 0.0156. 0.0136 0.4 0.4 117 1170 0.0040 0.0156 3.4788 1.5495 0.0121 3.2453 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 118. 1180 0.0040 0.0156 3.4944 1.5616 0.0121 3.2609, ' 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 119 1190 0.0040 0.0156 3.5100 1.5738 0.0121 3.2764 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4. 120 1200 0.0040 0.0156 '3.5256 1.5859 0.0121 3.2920 0.0156 '0.0136 0.4 0.4 121 1210 0.0040 0.0156 3.5412 1.5981 0.0122 3.3075 0.0156 0.0136 . 0.4 0.4 122 1220 0.0040 0.0156 3.5568 1.6102 0.0122 3.3231 0.0156. 0.0136 . 0.4 6.4 123 1230 0.0040, 0.0156 3.5724 1.6224 0.0122' 3.3387 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 124 1240 0.0040 0.0156 3.5880 1.6346 0.0122 , 3.3542 0.0156 0.0136. 0.4 0.4, 125 1250- 0.0040 ' 0.0156 3.6036 1.6469 0.0122 3.3698. 0.0156 0.0137 .0.4 0.4 126 1260 0.0040 0.0156 3.6192 1.6591 0.0123 3.3853 - 0.0156 0.0137 '0.4 0.4 127 1270 0.0040 1 0.015fi 3.6348 1.6714 0.0123 3.4009 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 . 0.4 128 1280 0.0040 0.0156 3.6504 1.6837 0.0123 3.4164 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 i 0.4 129 1290 0.0040 0.0156 3.6660 1.6960 0.0123 3.4320 0.0156 0.0137. 0.4 0.4 130 1300 0.0040 0.0156 3.6816 1.7083 0.0123 3.4475 0.0156 0.0137 0:4 0.4 131 1310 0.0040 0.0156 3.6972, 1.7207 0.0123 3.4631 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 132 1320 0.0040 0.0156 3.7128 1.7330 0.0124 3.4786 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 133 1330 0.0040 0.0156 3.7284 1.7454 0.0124 3.4942 0.0156 •0.0137 0.4 0.4 134 1340 0.0040 0.0156 3.7440 1.7578 0.0124 .3.5098 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 135 1350 0.0040 0.0156 3.7596 11702 0.0124 3.5253 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 ; 0.4 136 1360 0.0040 0.0156 3.7752 1.7826 0.0124 3.5409 6.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 137 1370, 0.0040 0.0156 3.7908 1.7951 0.0124 3:5564 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 138 1380,• 0.0040 0.0156 3.8064 1.8075 0.0125 3.5720 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 139 1390 0.0040 0.0156 3.8220 1.8200 0.0125 3.5876 0.0156 0.0138 .0.4 0.4 140 1400 ' •6.0040 0.0156 3.8376 ' 1.8325 0.0125 3.6031 0.0156 0.0136 '0.4 0.4 141 1410 0.0040 0.0156 3.8532. 1.8450 0.0125 3.6187 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 '0.4 142 1420 0.0040 0.0156 3.8688 1.8575 0.0125 3.6342 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 143 '1430 0.0046 0.0156 3.88441.8701 0.0125 3.6498 0.0156 0.0138 0.4' 0.4 144 1440 0.0040 0.0156 3.9000 1.8826 0.0126 3.6654 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 ,Total 1.0000 3.9000 Hydrograph Volume 44266 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-post25.XLS 2/11/2005 • CESINW, Inc. Page 3 'ZY tt x M, NA g ote ce al ~{or ix _ NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: Ancl,'~P - LA AGENT: lNtm yEkl /W,,7j2t3^J Phone: (5e>3) 931-112.2 Y2? Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 116 7.S SW Ckekar StREfY TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): -95 103Dc- TL IIGb NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: ~fd (f LAnJf2s RT-. V%EcJ PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ~~sr~ ~'Q a s / sd0" sG r ~o~ A~A: ch s~a or, I PA-; f%.xCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ~•~s.i~, FSil 4)Ti18L." ZONING MAP DESIGNATION:' W3 S CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.) AREA: C--,6~AJTIFj9 t- ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to.Code Section 18. 30 l MINIMUM LOT SIZE:,0o sq. ft. Average Min: lot width: 4v~ ft." Max. building height: ft.. Setbacks: , Front ' 2t s ft. Side d ft. Rear ft. Corner ;20 ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: - NEIGHRORHOOO.MEETING' (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review-the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. ' NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans, Examiner is encouraged, prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Appliicalion/Planning Division Section NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 183901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides' findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately, address criteria'would be reason to consider an application incomplete and,, delay' review of the proposal. The 'applicant should review 'the code for.applicable criteria. IMPACT STUDY . (Refer to Code Sections 18.390:040 and.18.390.0501. As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the' development • on public facilities 'and . services.,, The study shall.' address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways; the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, ' the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development: ' For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall'propose improvements necessary to meet, City standards, and to minimize the impact„ of the development on the public at large, 'public facilities systems, and affected private property users.', In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, 'the applicant, shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which, supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is. not roughly proportional to the projected impacts.of the development. [R/ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.7651 Minimum number of accesses: l Minimum access width: So, 5 . Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas,,must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND' FROM'.THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES,OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of.,all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses,. to, the streets which provide the required -access and egress. Walkways shall provide ;convenient connections' between buildings in multi-building comrercial, ..institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, Walkways., should be constructed between a new. development and neighboring developments. Q SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter .7301 ➢ STREETS: feet fr the centerline of LOWER INTENSITY ZONE feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOTSI E YARD SETBACK. % SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (efer to Code Section 18.730.010.0.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTION , Buildings located in a..non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor a .ea to site area..'ratio (FAR)-of 1.5 to 1'will exist;' ➢ All actual building setback will be' at least half of the building's height; and ° The structure will not ab a residential zoned'district. . BUFFERING AND SCREENING '(Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY. AND TO. EITHER REDUCE OR,ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE , OR VISUAL IMPACTS between: adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped, buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required 'buffer areas are described byhe Code in terms of width. Buffer areas' must be occupied bya mixture of deciduous. . and evergreen trees and shrubs 'and'must also. achieve .a.balance 'between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by, the Code. The r'eq'uired buffer areas may,-off. be occupied by vegetation, fences', .,.utilities, and walkways.. Additional information on required, buffer area materials and sizes may be found in. the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference, Notes' Page 2 of 8 NON-Residenfial Application/Planning Division Section ; The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary.' feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary.;, . feet along west boundary. . IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: "HOSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 183051, STREET TREES -ARE REQUIRED -FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100.feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way-or on private property within, six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. . Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced:, 20 to 40, feet 'apart depending on the branching. width of the proposed: tree species at maturity.. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. 'A MINIMUM'OF ONE (1)TREE-FOR EVERY'SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES "MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which,effectively screen the parking lot areas from view., These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. [RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY.. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service ..area. Lenny fling is-the contact person and can be reached.at (503) .625-6177. [vj/PARKING [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 , REQUIRED parking'forthis type of use: (Ywkf\ Parking SHOWN o.n ,preliminaryplan(s):. SECONDARY, USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES'MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ' ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: &feet, 6 inches"'x 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact. parking space dimensions: 7-feet, 6 inches'x .16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note' A. maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a'wheel stop or curb can be included 'as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED 'PARKING: ➢ All parking_ areas shah PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED, AND . DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number, of disabled person parking spaces.to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated'by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ , BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. [~/LOAUIING AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18365.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be' provided with. a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD. Pre-Application Conference Notes. Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential App11cadonlPlanning Division Section BICYCLE RACKS [Refer totode Section 183651 , a BICYCLE RACKS are, required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, 'COMMERCIAL AND, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS.' Bicycle racks shall be located'in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient. locations. SENSITIVE LANDS.. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 The Code Provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO. AREAS WITHIN THE ;100=YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON ,SLOPES IN EXCESS' OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE-GROUND.,'' Staff.will "a:tt'empt 'to-preliminar)( identify sensitive lands, areas at the pre- application conference.-based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to,precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries,, is the responsibility of the applicant Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides: regulations for..the use, protection,. or modification of'sensitive lands areas: RESIDENTIAL'DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS.- Q STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Section 18.715;080.C1 - When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order,'a geotechnica'l'report must be submitted which addresses the approval` standards of the. Tigard Community 'Development Code Section 18.775.080.C.. The report shall be based • upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations. for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEANWATER SERVICES [CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS. (Refer to R & 0 96,44/USA Regulations - Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT. ADJACENT TO-SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated, corridor for a buffer"wide enough to protect the water quality functioning- of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR. WIDTH is dependent;' on the sensitive area. The following' table identifies the required widths: " TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR.WIDTHS . SOURCE: CWS•DESIGN;AND CONSTRUCTION STAN DARDS;MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 "spy a ~T~ "t"5 a ctos'-T..". RA 'W pq '5 0, 3- :+c SLO ~JAC.ENT DTH t1,,EVE-,GEaTA- D ` K n~ SEIJST EVE fA DEFIN~T[ON R . s TOENSLTNE,AREAGORIDO,R ;F~tSIDE • . Streams with intermittent -flow draining: <25% LL ► 10 to <50 acres 115,feet > 50 to.,< 100 acres " . 25 feet " • Existing or created wetlands <0.5,.acre 25 feet' • Existing or. created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with'year-round flow . • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres ' • 'Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining:: >25% 1 101o < 50 acres -130 feet 1 50't'6 <I 00 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands 25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >11 60 acres . i point to the top'of ravine' (break in ` • • Natural lakes and ponds <25% slope), add 35,feet pastithe top of~ravinel' Starting point for measurement edge of the defined channel (bankf6l -flow)•'for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring 'boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of.15' feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor, shall not serve as a starting point for measurement 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet, if a stamped'geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained withthe reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes. Page 4 of 8 NON•Residential Apprication/Planning Divisi6n Section -Restrictions in the.Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction' activities,'' gardens, ` lawns, ,application of chemicals, dumping of any. materials of any kind, r* other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided _by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for: in the CWS Design and Construction Standards.' Location of Vegetated Corridor: I ANY'RESI ENTIAL DEVELOPMENT,. WHICH CREATES,MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision; .the 'vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not' be a part of any parcel to be used"for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR' TO' SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant' must obtain a. CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions•necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44'sensitive area requirements. If there.`are no,sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ; d (Beier to Code Chapter. 183801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO.. INSTALLATION -OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard: A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout. is available, upon request. Additional sign area or ' height beyond Code standards may.be permitted if the sgn proposal is reviewed as part of .a development review application. Alternatively, a, Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's. review. tZTREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS IRefertu Code Sectiion18390.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist' shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or . parcls for which a'. development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred'over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following:: Identification of the location, size and species, of all existing -trees including trees designated as significant by the City; . ➢ Identification of a .'program to .save existing trees `or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in 'caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060:D according to the following standards, and shall be exclusive. of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping; streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25%0 of existing trees over12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to"Section 18.150.070.D.,of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50%~bf existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be:removed be mitigated according to Section.18.190.060.D.; ' 1 Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires: that, 500/9' of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to 'Section 18.790.060:D.; . Retainage of 75%. or greater of .,,existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ a . A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used ty'the, applicant to, protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED "•WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR, TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION , LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried, as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790:060.D. MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18.190.060:E1 REPLACEMENT OF A TREE "shall take, place'.according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree, shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics., If.. a replacement tree of :the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably' available; the Director may allow replacement with a different species 'of' equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD, Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division section If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: 0 The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the.tree removed or. damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ; ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably- calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this,• section; a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the. City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code'Chapter 183951 The Cit requires that CLEAR'VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT ~8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required Gear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to. Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:. 25 fe unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition ust have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a'minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS S LL .NOT EXCEED 2%2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1'h times th minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS / 18.330 (conditional.Use) 18.620 (Tigard Triangle Design Standards) •18.765 (omtreet Paddng/Loading Requirements) 18.340 (Directors Interpretation) 18.630 (Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775 (Sensitive Lands Review) . .18:350 (Planned DevelopmenQ 18.705 (A=ss/Egress/circutation) ~ 18.780 (Signs) 18.360 (Site Development Review) 18.710 (Accessory Residential Units) 8.785 (Temporary Use Permits) 18.370 arlances/Ad'ustments 18.715 1 ) (Density Computations)- 18.790 (free Removal) 18.380 (Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720 (Design Compati bility Standards) 18.795 (visual Clearance Areas) 18.385 (Miscellaneous Permits) 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.390 (Decision Making ProceduresAmpad Study) ' 18.730 (Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) _ 18.410 (Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740 (Historic Overiay) 18.420 (Land Partitions) 18.742.(Home Oaupabon Pemats) _ 18.430 (Subdivisions) V 18.745 (Landscaping & Screening standards) 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts) _ 18.750 (ManufacturedIlMobil Home Regulations) 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/IRecycling Storage) _ 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Disl icts) 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations) y I , CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential `Applicationnanning Division section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: . . ~fDiT►1~NflC_ ~7SC ~Amcy\ it _Jrakes (9-q• ..U S -Icy rPr_."e 0>7 ORGe 41e_ ~PPy%,'-A r' Qle~'e. ` q o,f es tsei cA 6oA, ;t R C\e.~~. We~•e`- SQr.~.G~ C`OV,~ec c-. `~03 (pal = 3~a~ . . cee S6cJe~, YAQ(1 \P 'Q 1Q 0n Cc~^r~C9C1~' (e_`( >t'~t}itan rti'~ivY. j .(!n,-o 4cz.;}. Qrca~iae i+.L)SJ ~+~ric5~ 11 r a. ~P..SS rI~ QDtV~~JCrjc~n r'.h~nACS. r'~or-~o 7i~ ~nPr`e q Si-G~ qT G~inn~ ~ ['II~ ee~~l'S~rv,~..~ 6l` Ll.(`ri GhC:e- rn,1~ Vie` ~C>r, PROCEDURE ' Administrative Staff Review: Z ;Public hearing before the Land Use•.Hearing's_ Officer. Public hearing before the:Planning'Commission:. . Public hearing 'before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation` on the proposal to the City Council: An additional public hearing shall be held by the-City Council APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS. All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY-A PLANNING,. DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at. Tigard City Hall offices.. PLEASE'NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped -off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned.. The Planning'counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an a lication shall 'be folded. IN ADVANCE to 8.5 b 11 inches. One 1 81/2" X 11' ,'ma o a proposed. ro'ect shou d be su mitted or attachment to the staff re ort or administrative decision. Application with unfolded. maps shall not be accepted The. Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary. review, of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days.of'.the counter submittal. Staff will-notify the applicant if. additional information or additional copies of the submitted' materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON:Residen6al ApOicafion!planning Division Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application isaccepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. ' Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7), days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public. appeal eriod follows, II land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the. Planning Division upon request.' Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND'' THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirement's applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division - will not be granted until - there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or,, modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended 'to contact. a Building Division Plans. Examiner -to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to' be demolished has system development charge (SDC), credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded; the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first buildin ermit issued in the development (UNLESS, OTHERWISE. DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH `THE DEMOLITIOPERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: - The conference an noes canno .cover a Code requirements an aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site. plan. Failure of. the staff, to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is. recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read tbie Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION 'FEE' AND, CONFERENCE WILL,' BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION'CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE .(unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE:. (503),639-4171 FAX: (S03) 684-7297 E-MAIL (stairs first name)@.6.tigard.orms TITLE 18(gTY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.cijigard.Or.us . K: pattyhasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc 'Updated: 3-Oct-02 (Engineering section: preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes. Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section J, rl r e Y t. yPRE4FP %ICATI;ON CONFERENCENOTES .-X y y s F kr'`h~' y f ENGINEERING SECTION ClryofngamOregoni°' ,tI y',~C''tl. Lr _ _ j (mmu J1} ~T}r. i t~Jllt°t: <s1~ aks M wAa ,Sf x,4. S~kl~lllly~ hPC I t (mmurlTly PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map[sI: 2S1030C . Tax lot[s]: 1100 Use Type: RI'st Baptist Addition The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be, required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority: There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land 'area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way•to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication'for: ® SW Gaarde Street to 38 feet from centerline (37lane arterial w/ bike lanes). . AEG-.~'~~ l -t f S ❑ v.1 Ts2- l 10 A Ls, SW to feet tJ~~ Gtr xC('~G~t) Air ? R.'`ri~-' ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: ® Minor street improvements will be necessary along SW Gaarde Street, to include: ❑ feet of. pavement - ❑ concrete curb . ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ® street trees spaced per TDC standards (unless already installed as a part of the City's CIP project). ❑ street signs, traffic controlT devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Enolneering Department Section ❑ Other: L street improvements will be necessary along SW -;'to include: Ilo feet of pavement 5C~-k cc#-~4tAac .-t-• • E concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk Piz SrokPs. [street trees I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a, two-year streetlight fee. . B other: Wv&.-S hkrt ler (WA--,W ❑ street improvements will be necessary along.,SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ 'street signs, traffic control'devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. . ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW . , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control.devices,'streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: street improvements. will be necessaryalong SW to include: ❑ feet'of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm. sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engloeedag Department Sectlon ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: Aqreement for.Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred.. In,such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the, property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ❑ Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal-to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead,' utility lines which 'run adjacent to this. site along SW Prior to the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in- lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers.: ~ The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located along the west edge of the site adjacent to the creek. The proposed development must be connected: to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend a- new sewer lateral as necessary to serve the new building. r. Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire' Protection: Tualatin' Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) (Contact: Eric McMullen, (503)'612-7010] ..provides fire protection services . within the City, of Tigard. The District should be contacted, for CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Eeglaeoring Department Section information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City.shall, be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be, required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Onsite detention may not be required. The applicant's engineer can perform a downstream analysis per CWS standards to determine if the stream can accommodate the additional flows from this site. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management. (SWM) regulations "established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA). (Resolution and. Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains. a provision that would allow an. applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing, an on site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary, sizing calculations for any proposed water quality . facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project 'will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. . Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage" systems shall - be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have'unobstructed access to critical manholes' in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not 'otherwise readily accessible. 1) A traffic impact report is required to be submitted, as a part of the land use application. The traffic engineer will need to address level of service (LOS) at 110''/Gaarde. 'They will also need. to include an access study to address the proposal to relocate. the existing driveway on. Gaarde Street Access management standards,.of 18.705 must be addressed. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from. new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of.the project, and a general use. based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. 'in limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be-allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is, permissible oI when the TIF is greater than .$5,000.00. Pay TIF. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public' right-of-way, in the City. of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering' Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as.. street widening improvements, main utility line extensions, or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional, engineer must be submitted for review and, approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application,,, and. the City will track * its costs throughout the life of the permit, and, will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit' amount.' The Permittee will also. be required to post a performance bond, or 'other such .suitable security... Where professional engineered. plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI.: permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PH Permitls required, the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type. of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services' Counter at 503-639-4171, ext: 304. Site Improvement. Permit (SIT).. This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. 'This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading -and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on=site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in . cases where the., lot they are working. on has slopes in' excess, of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be'hauled from the site. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the .construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes, grading, etc:). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat. has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering. Permit, i(required, and return ,6 mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All.subdivision projects shall require a'proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess .of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections. will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans: - In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations- of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners-of the building. PREPARED BY: zee 0-1~, ENGINES DEPARTMENT TAFF DATE ` Phone: 15031639-4171 Fax: [5031624-0752 iAengtbrianrUemplateslpreap notes - eng.dot Revised: March 21, 2002 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicadon Conference Notes . page 6 of 6 . Engineering Department sectlon TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST. CHURCH J 11075 SW GAARDE STREET TIGARD, OREGON CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION RECEIVED 8/06/04 MAR 011005 Ai CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 2117/05 1 - - I ' 1~ "4. pia:: z c t xn . 0 rv r<, d M • ks 1 02- r. w. BE+...Y ~~y T x .Kp.~•~avt...~ s,. -.f+.•n»SY,n yam.: yf•; . °'"-'[Y~ " -T--- ° v'k . i ~ ~ r.✓d . ' ,~`+.,-.-•e } r,..x ~s• '1'- 'c - _ , Y RROJECT:TFAM r~ NUEX ? F~PNIING..~. :+"R'.' a c. . zs ' ":x`,.n ari - - ~._r "~_.._u .nz'- v- R H(TECT CIVIL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ARBORIST ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS CIVILDRAWINGS LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS ARCHITECT-LA CES/NW CHRISTOPHER FRES Al PHASE 1 SITE PLAN Cl EXISTING SITE PLAN L7 LANDSCAPE PLAN ITEM TREE CARE AND LANDSCAPES BOS S.E. SHERMAN ST. 15513 SW BANGY RD. SUITE 300 1pp S.W TAYLOR, SUITE 355 UNLIMITED A2 PHASE 2 SITE PLAN C2 PHASE 1 SITE PLAN PORTLAND, OR 97214-4666 LAKE OSWEGO. OREGON 97035 PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 PO BOX 1566 A3 PHASE 3 SITE PLAN C3 PHASE 2SITE PLAN ARBORIST DRAWINGS LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 A4 LOWER LEVELFl00R PLAN C4 PHASE 3 SITE PLAN Ti TREE INVENTORY PLAN CONTACT: LARRY ABELL CONTACT: CARL JENSEN A5 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN C5 GRADING AND EROSION - 503-231.1122 503/OW-665,5 CONTACT: CHRIS FRESHLEY A6 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN C6 CONTROL PLAN 5031222-9861 CONTACT: RAYMOND MYEFI 503-635J165 A7 ELEVATIONS UTILITY PLAN CGA PROFILE, SW 110TH AVE TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH -20216 • CONDITIONAL USE TIGARD, OREGON R3.5 R4.5 W R4.5 R7 W R7 a: o as Qa (OY NEW CURB AND GUTTER O¢Y cl (1) (L NEW PLANTER STRIP ma ARCHITECT • LA NEWS'CONCRETESIDEWALK - 805 S.E.SHERMANSTREET PORTLAND, OR 97214.4666 SW 110TH AVE (LOCAL) SW/ 231-1122 _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ FAX 503!231-0317 . _r EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ' - - - = - - - ' - - • ' - - - - • - - - 21'0' 110'-0' 32'6' STREETCENTERLINE 14 - - ~ ' - - - - - T~ ,z uF,R¢ { EXISTING PROPERTY LINE x - -ai I - ' liset i 20'-W ( PHASE 1 PARKING c 4 ISTB~(a ZiEXI _-bac 46 SPACES m v W N FF.2571T~ rx.~ ~I o,-0• w 4 i , 6 " - - m ; 3D'-0' NEW PROPERTY LINE W i I NG # ` - AFTER B' ROW DEDICATION N ~Z 24'-0 - - - ' - - 24-0' EXISTI ti ,5 = I ~ 0 - 1~ L a . I i 3'OVERHANG " I $ o Iv BICYCLE / N PIN 4 , TYP. /PARKING , m Q R3.5 4 , ,zRr4e < 00 EXISTING PARKING -76 SPACES , f Ir , u°1dE ! Q N C P------ I® ® SHED d i'•.. _ i W LL LO '•.OUAL WATER TTYSWALE 0 _ 4 F R12 LL O T co P rl o I Q Ir RR W T 10 cc IzFp 10 I (7 ' - -o 10 PHASE i PARKING - BB SPACES, ; U~NDPHASE IGAARDE V I , _ _ , ~ 24-FIR 5'TYP. _ r~ - - 'BIKE PATH I' :.10•Flfl ® ® BR v .'o 0 0 EAS ENT a~- _ _ F- WET ND BUFFER ~g r - - _ ]eAF 4P RR - I y o 27 Rfl m BOUNDARY , 3 VEGRTED " N17 -ALDERS yl ERR13r - I 20 80(E PATH. V - - ® - % ' EASEMENT E W FIRS RA i , - - - _ ® • \ ' WET ND BOUNDARY r ' I r CENT RUNE ' ' OFCR EK . R3.5 R3.5 CONTENTS : '•r-- PHASE ISITE PLAN . L ->1"- , R3.5. PROJECT : 20216 L- - I ~ I DRAWN BY: 1 H DATE : 8112/04 SITE AREAS: R3.5 se0v PHASE i SITE PLAN EXISTING PHA PH2 PH.3 II SCALra1`-W4r 05 ,s 30 REVISIONS: BUILDING 12,793 S.F.=6% 12,793 S.F.=6% 16,346 S.F.=B% 23,428 S.F.=13% I PARKING PHASE( I CONDRIONALUSE REVIEW 2117105 PARKING 27,460 S.F. = 14% 70,620 S.F. = 35% 56.650S.F.=28% 67.293S.F.*: 33% 3'OVERHANGSPACES: B'-6'X75'-0' 134 ' EXISTING SPACES 76 LANDSCAPE 162,449 S.F.=80% 119,289 S.F.=59% 129,706 S.F.=64% 111,981 S.F.=54% 210TOTAL I`f - - - - - - - - - - J. ' TOTALS 202,702 S.F. = 100% 202,702 S.F. = 100% 202,702 S.F. =100% 202,702 S.F. =100% Q1 u aRE v. Rgm..epoEU 9m ' w~mWmvmwnsmml -L& vmamm a Pa .r~uOrECTCr • u Otagnp----------------- R3.5 R4.5 R4.5 R7 R7 NEW CURB AND GUTTER ` NEW PLANTER STRIP ARCHITECT. LA 805 S.E SHERMAN STREET NEW S'CONCRETE SIDEWALK PORTLAND, OR 97214-46W SW 110THAVE So3r231-1122 - FAX 5031231-0317 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT 1 - - - - - - - - - - - + I: 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1RHAWTHORNE I - - - - _ - _ 76'-0' I 55'-0' m .78'6 STREET CENTERLINE KK . L 11 cc - I I • m )12' MAPLEO I PHASE2 I * o P ' I - - - - - - PARKING - EXISTING PROPERTY 1 SPAC 21Y 1 I 1 v 'F° 3'0' 24,-0, A.-X-C'II~( I - . Se 38'-0' NISTRYBU'r IN BUILD 4 1 ' .301-0' LLI . FF 257.1T .y I 1 9'-0' 1 ? z' I LLI I I 8 - - - - - - - - I P. i ANEW PROPERTY OW DEDICATION' Z EXIST7 17ti y•,.-y ' FTERB'R N _ _ , . 1 ' - - - - 43 PHASE2 6 r 3 rc 3'-0'I 156 24'-0- I I I . 1 I 6 - - - - - . 1a B 8 _ DDITION 1, ~ q e 1 I I nP. 8 ` CYCL ' ~[(J . gyp,;'.>. PARKING ' LL I 1 TL mx2vRniaFe+wc°i"""ES ' b lp¢ ^ i ' I Q Q O. . aAw umC . 'NJQl WIM OPoVE A6lE ' .N iC R3.5 h~ , ~6 I F m p. 'INIE 1.•10 ® ' ® 0 I 1 r' , I Q pprtu~F I ` 1 . ' -------r------ 10 FINE 1f I SM® I 1 ®IV P3'IF` hp I W S WATER ' '•.OUALrFYSWALE 10 4 S ' ' I Q R12 LL C) ~ 9 I r" I 10 I II trFw rFFi - - - - - - . ~ I 1r F31~~ •A',. 10 Q ®®1~Fw ~zF1H N e.8, 10 1o a r~ 10 88 Iq NEWICCESS ...V "5' TYP. I a I I. 214IR 24-FIR 'BIRE PATH • I - - _ 4r RR ® 0. 10 ® ^ Bq EASEMENT . 1 I c;;-_- PP - F- WETUNDBUFFER. . C r 4a FIR 20• FIR BOUNDARY 4W FIR -0-0-- \S ' VEGITATED = c - - - a~yszEn 3i I 6.AN COMMUNITY BOUNDARY 20' BIKE PATH I I , _ \ ---I- - - - - - - IT-FIB a _ r, E IWALD. EASEMENT 3w 1W FIR - - \ ' WEND BOUNDARY I I • I 1 i / J ' r - ~ /~I_CENTERLINE . ' I ~ ' I - 1 OF CREEK R3.5 R3.5 f - - - - - - - - - - I CONTENTS: 1 PHASE 2 SITE PLAN' I , R3.5 PROJECT: 20216 I ~ DRAWN BY l N DATE : 8112N4 - R3.5 SHOP PHASE 2 SITE PLAN ® I SCALE OS 15 b REVISIONS: PARKING PHASE 2 CONDIT ONAL USE REVIEW 2117105 , 3' OVERHANG SPACES: 8'•6'X15'-6' 144 ' EXISTING SPACES 8 152 TOTAL 1 Q2 m's me emceepope~• m ' ulan~Pu Nmee, apohvfm, a u1cNNCCr u . ®comgm - m R3.5 R4.5 R4.5 R7 R7 NEW CURB AND GLITTER NEW PLANTER STRIP ARCHITECT • LA . 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET . NEW 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PORTLAND, OR 97214.4666 SW 110TH AVE 503 /231-1122 FAX 5031231-0317 - - - - - - - r E, EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - - - - - - - - - - + r m m 10'NA 79~ 77 CEOAA . - - - - - - - . I 11 24'-0' rP,wAE , qa-0' 76'•8' n 37,6. STREET CENTERLINE - 11 <;j, .Y_.-,• m EXISTING PROPERTY LINE r,--------- r -LO - - - - 1 EXIST set 380' 'IAMISTRYBUdDING..EX INO V 30'-0' 11 . l 1 ' I FF 2571T f BUILDING 4 I r l 1 3'-0' ' 15'6' 24'-0• I ;7 FF 254 $ r I 0 4 11 1 DORION ' I NEW PROPERTY LINE . AFTER 8' ROW DEDICATION N Z r,D. --------r I I" I I 24'-0' 8 D I 1 fa O I I , 6 4 11 ICYCL 1 I I W W I r 1 PARKING _ I . a oQ uASannrlRw ERaosuaE ' 10 { ae 1pEAA Ns®EI wlrn I Q Ip1AN INKPULLOPENNG W lE4 1 • AR Q Q O 1SPNE •P -•PARKING 55 SPACES ~ i I . I m I . AWNWIIR ORhE A15lE R3.5 - TYP. < 0 - a •y I 1 10 3 - - - PHASE3 ~'oPOE ti ADDITION W cl) WATER _ I r ( Q LL i Ol1ALRY SWALE 10 - 4 5 i r 1 R12 0 ' 1'RR V - i I IL T - - I ry 10 I I ' 1, 1rF 7 - ' uRR~~Y,.F 10 FIR 3, . r I FIR _ p - - - BICYCLE PARKING 'r 10 76 INSIDE BUILDING TYP. R y' I " '..1 . _ I 24-RA 24'RR 14. %~-t J-.}5'TYP. 20' B0'(E PATH ""rte FIR -EASEMENT - -I- - - u• ® ® Blj p - 1 -C-,- ` ` /IV SLOPE ce w WETLAND BUFFER 0 10 r - _ - - - ~a~1n A0'~ m•Fw BOU DARY RR `~r_ VZ/-------~ - a3$" I\ I GRATEO o. 'a ASR ' COMMUNITY 20'0 O(E PATH p~IB.-_" m ' - , _ _ _ 1e rID.. , e E . EASEMENT - • - ® • ^ I WETLAND BOUNDARY 1 .I 1 , -I 1 I , r ---------------------------J CENTERLINE OF CREEK R3.5 R3.5 CONTENTS: , , , I , I PHASE 3SITEPLAN 1 ' t L_____________, f R3.5 PROJECT : 20216 DRAWN BY: , R3.5 SHW PHASE 3 SITE PLAN R DATE : 11n1/04 . ® SCALE =1b31YV os 1s 30 REVISIONS: PARKING PHASE3 Q CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW2/17105 , 3' OVERHANG SPACES: 8'd'X15'-6' 177 EXISTING SPACES 8 - 185TOTAl Q3 " ~a. rAaul~.u R~.nROa~mm . ' PtlrZbn bl rp bsbiay . admen aeegq.lfom Fmliam a ARpulECr •u • GCa~ya t , 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I / r / - 54'-0- r / , # I 1~ . 71 : 1 L~ I 1 ca 9 iri e, miinn v a ~n m c SJ v 44 • 1- D 3 ~yy 4i~ r. ~hh~y ` - cNi r! i ` ~ I I Z daJ! d C fZ m ~ 4~ h . • t ~i~.,.~.1' to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I T 4 I " ~ I m,y~R s'S1 R , ~ ,P e44 A. i y ' - it akS P, t~ - I - ' I. d i Z' .asra ~ } I N o 40'-0- 83--e- ' i 601-0" °m I N ~ I M < , m ' 0 - z Z QAARDE STREET a Oq R D m p M 0 "0 m r-O Tg Na y N Z TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCHo . M 4~h s 11075 SW GAARDE STREET 9~ ~m TIGARD, OREGON Nm~ r I r t I , 54'•0" r i I r , 1 O .T x ~~41 :n 0. N ; 8~ b 1 r ' ••h.,w ~I 1 k o~ aw' 0 r c . •~7IIJ~ 11 4 I D T 4~.' ~ 5 ~ p 7pp; 33 ~ ~ s is 1 ~ s"F isiAC I" O ,S M ~ \ ~ rlQ~ '1'~ y', ' r Ma k1 13 • r~`<' ,{56~~ f ~ ~ f / l£ ~ Z S ~ NFL r lffilr w x S"t. - t F ~u;" ias m i • I 40 -V ~ I 80'•0" N Z I q Nm ~ I I r O z • z GAARDE STREET a ea D m a ~g ~D g s TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 5X{= 2 2 2 co IN LSOM -1 a, I ~ Cil N 11075 SW GAARDE STREET ~N R' Z TIGARD, OREGON 0 ~ a C - - - - - -LL - L' I sa•o" A ' ' " ~1 7 cl) m ~a I tth ~ N+ 10 n ~ E yip i i 1 } -0" . . _740'.0" 83'•6" 60'k IC y r- §n m ~ 1 I M r , z Z GAARDE STREET a oa 4 D DO O 0 T > 2 p0 8ND 9 -.5 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH =y= a g s~09~ Z 11075 SW GAARDE STREET TIGARD, OREGON V m> E%IGTING CHURCH ASPHALTSNMGLES 0 . 12 2V.W T.GD. 01 F. FL 79.17 -m v M® - ARCHITECT LA caPasffmm SONG sNICr. F. FL z5197 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET 41 F. FL 2ISW ® 4.L F. FL 245.Wy PORTLAND. OR 972144669 - 5031231.1122 . FAX 5031231-0317 a "F R- IO'iST SOUTHWEST ELEVATION PHASED ADDITION . • I T~ W - w • _ 'O~- ASPHALT SHINGLES N I°C- Z p N 1/v1~SI ;U.L F. FL257.IP CWIPOSITION 9DNG m a 0w . 4L F. FL 245.W, 0 EXISTING MINSTRY BLDG. a L LL F. Q 1 11 RXIS.6W . r 3 N cn 0 NORTHWEST ELEVATION P USED ADDITION t- r U.o r V 1 L~ . ASPHALT SHINGLES.. a s a oo WMP~SILTFpNR61T1 1 mm m m m SANCT.F.R.75197 . EXISTING. CHURCH PHASE2ADDrtION EXISTING MINISTRY BLDG. 1 EAST ELEVATION SCALE=1b16'O ' CONTENTS: ELEVATIONS 250.67. - 1 PROJECT : 20216 ASPHALT SHINGLES _ DRAWN BY: DM DATE :11!11104 0 COMPOSITION SIDING - m REVISIONS : I.CT.F.FL25197 CONDITIONAL USE M.L. F. FL 215.W REVLEW 2117105 a EXISTING CHURCH LL R FL 2331W PHASED ADDITION l SOUTH ELEVATION A7 ngaae•mdm Opelya wicaim ac 7 • u y Is G m:av b.,l -as1.y aaiPL mam~on errU of ARCHITECT a 0(ipyn/1 . T ~DPED •gIN(EiP foR Ba os- ING►J~ too ►Rp AK N0-V TA pq,►1,C_5 d* S,,,riplls CAMP 40R~a~li pRaP~~ ~ ~ - IG RFf 4•. E 163.10 " S / Gkoll 233 yj~G,P i 240 011" ~ ~Rt~EN pK P1. a fj~l~~ c ~r!/~' 240 ~ It, I I,/ \ X3245 I i ~ i ~*~~~i~~!r(( j/! ! l rf t i 1, ~ ~jj j I 1 1 I N~ • I~ I I r III jr/ I 1 1 L ! 1 ► I E 7s.1r .~69~s•~ ~ ~ I~il lii~i il~l,.ll rl. (I 1 f1IIIIJf1 /l / if \lIf ~ti / • ; ~ ~ ~ I ~ • 1 I I I I I~I i ~ I j 1 III J j t 1. L.1.t ~ . i 1 . f i ~I I t 01/d JJi rl ! l I l /J Ile o lna j ~h (hll /llJl liJ i I ► ~ 1 1 t dllt d~I I, ~ c J I~ t+~ I~'~I~11 ~ t I 1 t l~ I I I f " Ii jll iptlfi~u~tt I i i I i~J t I IIj~l1~6~~ JI I X46 9,7 ''IJI f tjJ~f+l Ig/ ti~ I I ~1 \~~~~~/l) Ij~l 1, ~.l J J I ~Illttt(I~I/~ It. i 1 I II ~ } I 1\ I J ( 1 ,1 1 11 •1 r 1~=:,\'a l., IIII,; t JJ~J~J Itl,ll J~JJ / ~ ti ~ ~ tI~ I ~1 / 1' ill\~IJ 111 111 I J J J / J t Jill JJI~IJJtJti~ pwE ! a =1 46• G' 04 t .III 1 II IIII! 1 J JI /I J J t I II I IJ if II JI'~ l l I t t I t ! I 6 ' III! II ICI . i I I (I III ~If II p n r~ ' 1 111, ` 11 / ~II II J / It I ( I ((I I I I I I I M"I,acAp / 1 ~ / /I j 1yI, IIII I 1 1' I I Illilfllllll II _ / T F ;;s G £ I 3t SW, GpAID PK /l lti I~ 1~II I i i 1~~ 11 i l,lil llllll I l a, i_ I I ~t` ~Y / 1 1 r 1 ill IIII II I I I via 1( 11!!11 I N 16 11~~_1 I I III` ~1 _a t ,aE,, oRU~ 41 I \t 11 (j 1jj~~1~ fIR I evf ' ' ' I I I i KEY STOW W \l(~11~ .1 'IFlRI~ II X11111 v" ,11 ~ \ 1111 1 \ ~ ` 1 : I~11 I I - ~ _ s,Ers I ,a\\\\ 111, 1 \ I I 1 III' 111 I ~ ,w.~G~ I ~I " `1 ~ 11'11 ~ 1 1~1~ I i 11111111111 I / - / - w' 5i01~.11• 39 CAP 1 I T °0" "1\11111111 L 111 II , I 41U, a0~ ssa w~1111111111~11(1 1 I" I I I , _ 1 SIVS coo" ~ 111111111'i~~l~`P r f ~ ► ,i I~ i i ¢ I~i 11~1~i1 r _ w",!' lillllu~l 11 l ~ , ~l l , I I I I III~IIEI,1111 - -I SVS 11 ' ; SHOP '~1111111'`~ II r ' I 111111 II pl li ji I 111 I, ' an of 1WAO ' 1i11111I1~~~I~r~~ 1 I t 11 II~,~I"11111. _ d1~ 11 1 I vp ' /11111111 J I 11 ' IIIi1~lil~li111 ~.,tdf' "E 1~1 1" B" ~11111111I~~1't 111111 ~1 I J JJ Ili1~111~,1111 - 'wYr,, . 254.91 ~ 111111111` t I I i I I i 1~11,,111111111. z ~ a Mot •Ir 1h t1 {fl t! 1 j I I1 1 t I p„~rb i MOO 1 / T 1/111111 / 11!' , GR"VE G R 20.s~s I1I / / V I 1111111\ pK IM". F' IIJI~iI 11!(/// /j r 11.11 J 1 III ~ 111 \ N►~o`►o+~ • a dill Jt 11\~~ I I 11 / I I 1 IIII -249- j pIo' 1 Roo~„~ G!L IIit'll ~/1~/, ~11~r1 /II1111`t`~ _2„_ iYVsS„.._m,~ ti IIII JIJ jj j j/1. / , I' (I J I~;\~ ~.7 6 votoo Ls 59 0 . g~RtON - 0 gyp. 5/e WIC CAP sw_ SM 112tH ~9.56•Gp'M la66 t.M.p J 0Ir X o O E-dT Q m tn t 1~ D SW ,IG X q ZZOM YZ pO ~ ~ c G >C jX 4of 91 PAQ 1^A~ m. _ TIGAR~ 9, go g Z _ is S,A "N STFtEEO BOS SE N OREGON UWt3YA01D V035 PORTLAN0.1122 rot- iS57SSW aifr° 23 ~o• m+n 503- A~.~°• .965.6655 PHASE i 30 v'A / J I ~ ( t JlI ~ ~ J ld J / 1 j I % " \ " --SYC t3A~p~ . I11'J JJl J 1 /I / I! / I jf %fj / N . , TSyyeA51N I~ I r 111 l 111 1.1 / 1 / / J I l// / / a 45 , t th'I I I I~ I~ f~ f! 1 1 1 1 / ~ ~ r ~ a 7 I ~11 I.I't_ I I I f ! ! f~f I I I / 6 J ~ t"i ~ ~i 1 1 Z30 `tr ` N ~ I 1 llfff ~ ~r,• ii l l I 4 ~ ; m> ~ . I i J if 1 h f rIJ /111111/ f . ' ' sp„ ++N^ I I I f 5~j/t/Jl ,l J I J f f ~ / ,~o HA M ~1\\~ 111 Ilf J JJ 1 J 1 ~f 1 ' ;{z4'P,~E~,wu . lJ If 1 111 I I I i! / J I I. t X11 L/ I it iff I J/ s( j, 1 I.1 ,e i 1~ q 1 1' t I 1 I ti l J 1 I . I - / / r P", N~ - _ ppEN PK pt" / Iti (f~flll J / J f ;I I 1 ~`r1 SGNS II j as \ $W• I r T ~41 Z1,~~'~ id* V,\~ - - STEPS 3 3 t. GRAVEL IS To I I 1 1 > Npni I11111~i1~ 1 'T t I rf DOORS 111 t\ I1'' ~ 111V I I I I I ~il I . I i 1111 . I\ 1`1 11 4 4 41 , I I ~'0P s .1\1 I'llt'~1 11 I~' t t J r, 1'I; a0 1 1. ~ i 1~1 I" \ L j11111111If1 l i rK I I y 141 K J ~ 1 J 11111141' 11 ~1 I I1 11114111 1 l 15 10 l 24 . I 11 - EAU sue,, ~ 01 -FM ~(1141411I ~~Yj! I~~ l ¢ l ~ I I 4 G230 1 II it C / / J ~ 11 ~ PARK All y N7~ ~,n+ l J~ I 111 { I/ I~ f/ 1 ~ NANOtCAP \ v' . l~ JJIJII I J J 1 -249 ell' PARKING N fl~lfflllllj~li/1 "1 J _2+e 111J1 t~/1/ /II l 6 h' To 9E c~osEO - ~I1111 ~If l / ~ P~N = rm - °~'-t►FtDE SI R 0-4 > 1 I o 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 I 1 ~ li it I ~ ~ ' ~ ~ N r ~ pTIST ~ ~GARp BA ARCKI1EC1 LA STREET ' °rt arm ✓ SfA 805 SE SHER EGO N o+E,offMacs Gy!y~DA~5i8 PORTLAND' 122 ~~orw i. rW pw. 10 P 1ssl Vsm x = 503 23A JIA 503. _ giTE ALAN BASE EASEMENT 230 / / / / / / tA`+/ / j ' , - =40 B.W. 0 EN PK PL ! If1///// t /j~../ /mil c ~r-~ ' !II ! ' !!I!!l/ ll! / 1. i I " 245 l~ Y / l~ii ! ! 1 124• ! /Z / . 7t Bar HALL III ! I` I.\I/ / / r l I / w W-~ \1Jf. a EX. IA PA p. 10b A 1 ; l/ fl.. ob / a// 11 rrrJ.J .Lr:N I I / I \ \ `1\\ 1 ~I ^ I I I I I I~ ! I LI ~,Is y1, SIGNS 171 11 110111 I I I ~1 I I ( . e I _ / - I I I a I S.W. GARDEN PK PL .`\\\\II\\!11;\\I III 11111 I I ! E I I _ ~ 1 I I/ \ III ~II 111 \I I I 1 if ~\\~~Q11~1 ',I\ \ l~ ; \~I11~11I11I {I~l~r ~1 I if III = ,0'.IIGE ay II EI I / - }l j 111llll'll 1 1 I I STOW I AR IVIIII I I I II E►IIIJ / TiV>+. (W•. III II III~II~I /III III ~ y I~I111 N - SHOP II I I 111 ~1) 6• I I I I 3' rin IIIIIIIII ~I I I 1 l! l I ~ll~` I I I HIOI IIIIIIIIIIIt1 II o 1 ! I ~III~r Au_ I um 11 1111111 I/ ~I + / / j EI I I I FENCE • I~~ IIII ; ' a / _ ¢ ^ ` MAN 000" TO ►Illllpl ~ I A I h ~ ~ I v - ~I b > t I~IIIIIIIIIII~~/ I III! • N/ I I - - ~I : I ~ ~ ~ >d • I: II 111111 / / + r, I 1 3 I 1111/ h / lJ - ~ _ I I 141111111I~/ ////J/! ! / / E IIII. _ KE, ~ ( IIII I'LL 1 I ; III I . /~~~/1 l1f~11~ lI i /r~(/ r~ / I I II I=so TIC C"LRC" OFFICE ' "L~ V HIGH -=+e ~P R'KIN~P n- ' . - / - - - TO BE CLOSED . PROP. DRIVEWAY PHASE 1 ~ CONST PHAS Z F7c CM AND S- S.W. GAARDE STREET ill cap DRAWN Dr. ca 1. acv. PHASS 2M casm. or TO "MW- x-is-ot CATCHBASIN Z 9 P TIGARD r BAPTIST CHURCH :r,% 77 L n n _ CES NW PHASE 2 SITE PLAN, iSMSWBANGYROAD.M300 ARCHITECT LA LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 805 SE SHERMAN STREET 503.968.6655 w .Ce .Co PORTLAND, OREGON ' "aa-ei•aeASCOro 503-231-1122 SO • I a - zill- BIM PAY" EASEMOff CSCt- ,r 2*0 S.W. o~WEN PK.PL CATCHBASIN • t .1/III 111l 11'1/11//]Y/r/ llrl { ' ' ~ ~ _L j 111 ~1 I I Irl I ~1 1 / I l / l/ 1 R / / ; ; I 2,5 I II'T,1111/llr„~/ 1 1 I I 24 .24' -150; I ,~r~~l ~ l / l l1 ~T tRo w I rrh'411 I if /l1/Ill //r'/~/ /l lI/ r l 1 l I 3 J /i l ll ll / 111 f l''° l q 24' -A; 2 m / • ~~~.}1~~1.1 ~1 ~',II III III I 1 1 Ij , . 11~ 11 I I y I I ~f I I I I / 1 I I..I ~0 I I s \\~11~b11`~111~I ~I1 I $ I I fit I. I,~3 I S.W.OARDEN PK PL KEY sTDHE I Imo. \ WALL ``III\II\\\ ~III1 ~I III11 I I I I I I / \~\\~~~~II I ~ I I I I ( I I I I ~II I 3 \\III~1,11~ ~II h ~4 1/ 1 1 1 1 1 Ile ,D- wDe 'I 1 I. ►I,,Ilpl11lll~ll I ► I M ST. II IwA,S ~IIIIIIII`I~III I~I III ► ~ILII/ >,r 11111111111111 )III It I III III , _ SHOP II I WI I X11 1 I IIIIII111~~I111~~~~ ^11111 1 11 II ~I IIII III I ,s HIG" I1111111I~' lo II / III I I s ALL vow FDK9 1111111 I j1 1 I r ~ I I I I II I II II II II IIIIII~ Y/ ~ ~ I /III I I I I I I I I I I ~ MAIN, oRm Jill I ~ 1'~ • 111111111111;/ ~I) I I I i II I I O I ~i I II II I I I\ I. HM.. 3W I11I111Jill ))I //II ' IIII II IIII I I"s°E II. IIII l/1111 WALL J I IFF 254.99 ----w woe OWRCH Dance KEY IIII \ W A114TOW HASE lip -L 11, ~249 248 Q-TY COMMUNITY Bd1ND PROP. DRIVEWAY - I - - - - ' - - CONSTR. PHAS 2 - v~ - M S' w. DAARDE STREET IIII x, ,I 1 a -a 8 4 Q~ X a o "I lll~! rn Z. a P c m CBJ cal 1. RFV: OrG FOR PKG dYENSMS P1 3 3-15-05 "jI DRAW BY, R TIGARD 'BAPTIST 'CHURCH Es NW PHASE 3. - SITE PLAN FEB S 13373SWBANGYROAD, SM300 ..ARCHITECT LA IAKEOSWEGO,ORBGON'97035 805 SE SHERMAN STREET 303.968.6655 mmw.ce~aavmm PORTLAND; OREGON 1545-61404SAM0WO 503-231-1122 O►SOb3 Qi~1~d ON►QytiKJ N: -Ayl t£Z-fOS tow, 009 ~OusSt ~eaa N0+'ONtl~'a0d Stwb .INO~il?PNB ~a'4 "093 35 508 oo[ prie SA ~,L yNl up 13315'"tl Y1 1031IH921d. e s , VMS Ira z 3s ~ aoaa o"rwa ~{y' Ott ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ a ;;a e.z- 111 I I >~1 It t/il t!l g a W ill th ~A d d 1 •~~~ydy o . r 11 I' I l illlllll # I IIIIII . ~ 1 ~ s8~ III 1 f -•a ! I I ~ 1 1 ~ ICI IIIIIIIII 1 ~ ' ~I . I1 Illilflil~l 1 1 i 1~ 11t11111111) ` 1 11 0~ ►II11I 1 ~I~.f tl1~1111111 = ,,,,~s► 1111. ► $ l yl~lllllli l IIII r i ~ y~~ i (N,111111111111111' i dDVG dus `illlllllllllil. I ilVl~l~i~111111111111 1 1. ~ooo wv" I II1111~ II. ! ! 1111'11111111 I .c ~a 11 I I II 1 1111111111111 . gs s 111, $ I/ I I I I. I 1 1 ~1~1111111111% 1~ I 1 sd~► I 1 1111\ raa►' a 1 I I' M ~ 1 ~1 1 w' i / III ~ n~~ IM I / 111111 ~ 1 \~R~ X11 ~ 1\\ ~ s r It I saw 1 I 111111 \ M iy • I. I; au 1. 11 'AL ~1 p It d 1 1. I 1 1 I! a+i 1 ~1 ~ ~.MS 'Ad ITI r d I J l 1 Nei I!i! I /1 f~{ S / 1t ! 1 / / t t!!I IIIIV1~% o r i II y~ \ Ml/ ¢1 ~ ' of H 01 ~ i J,'JJJJj~tlt 1~~~~t o L# to ~ ~,m ~ g ~ r 1 I J , S~~J I~ I•! I f IA ~p•MS j 1 ~/lJ ll~/1/l j 'Ad "17 ~-4CE 1~4 ~ ~ / / / l.0/f~/J tr ~ Y ~ ; \ , 11' 1 ~ ~y _ ~1' ocr ~j / / / f vrA~a9 s ulalow an xw4ro"" J o co 0 256.5 I o CA o o M ONO ommaw"T 256.7 evcs 0+ 1 EVCi: 256. 3 267.30 ~ , ~ ~ + 257.6 i r4m 100 O 257.70 roc, .70 1 , ► SYC& 1 3213 9rCt: 11 258.3 ► • 266.J6 + 258.5 o'.~ N 267.66 ~ 257.3 1 1 PL fib 2" 2+62 mu I + 255.7 0 0 253.8 1 + 252.0 0 0 1+1 BVCLt 261 - 261.06 c 249.7 217.9) 1 1 245.8 24&79 --4 g > , m 213 20 240.1 / c1rc:211. .233.9 Msc,64 ' evCe 231. 231.19 228.1 ' Mopom La It 22ato ~ • + 224.1 0 U4.13. 22266 n 221.2 MJ7 IS 1 1 1 22as6- : - 1 _ • + 219.7. I 1 O 0 1 : 21416 220.6 _ 8016 1 1 1 . 1 + 221.5 1 O O 1 1 ' 222.7 ► 01 TIGARD BAPTIST. CHURCH PROFILE CES NW 0) SW 110TH AVENUE 13s73S1VEANC;YROAD,SMJM ARCHITECT LA LAKE OSWEGO. OREGON 97MS SM SE SHERMAN STREET 303.96&6655 vaw,onav,wm PORTLAND. OREGON 803-231-1122 i Q_ a a a' I R3.5 R45 z R415 R7 .0 R7 1 a NEW CURB AND GUTTER:__ . Z PtARMC.WRISNTHEPoSM CLEARANCE TMANGLES SHALL / NEW PLANTER STRIP ISE'uiolrAxEDSOASmvROVeEaRLaaESAFSGNF ' < / [VEXCEPF POR TREE TtMSfSjeEfN'®17 Ff ANDeFF. AROYE u Ul CURB NEIGNF NEW 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK ARCHITECT Y LA o aP S-W. 110th AVENUE 605 S.E. SHERMAN STREET -PORTLAND, DR 97214-4666 B AP 503 / 231-1122 12 NR FAX 503 / 231-0317 41r ~ ~ r Ism -r - --c" • n SP 9 - j STREET CENTERLINE (J L4 f / M tD 15 W N 11 S ME%5876 UNDSCAPE y';`~ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 5 / 1 13 FG 20 FC TO AFLAN '1217elhedj FPANG~: ' : 21 FG 21 FG F f--r 25 NR 18 B 25 u MINISTRY BUILDING CHURCH BUILDING I 1 W E)OSTING LANDSCAPE NEW PROPERTY LINE U' l 1 11 f TO REMAIN N AFTER 8' ROW DEDICATION W ' y' . 9 BN I _ PHASE 2 ADDITION W W I{ I I z L 11 14 BH ID O 3' R.c. ¢ Q I 15 FC 1B FG ' 2 RO 1B ID 2 RO-' 30 FIG 75 NR zz u w L~J 2 RO 7 SV IS FC 27; Gf5 Q 3g BpN 19 FG B N 23 G 31 W I I 8315 JSY~ 6R B05 66 i fN ~ a R L 11 ' 3 Q Q z JN I L 7 all B RFL N/ j 1B •JS • J 1 JA PM GYMNAS1UffDN I 3 I RA LSD •'l'i~f/ SR 9OS 5 2 py R1R H 9 NR 8 OrvC 36 DV 0-1 3 f1F I g , F• f 1 IL SP 1 S f-~ L(7 . 3 OF lr1H~r~ 3 21 W RA : 4 I , IPA ~ _ .--H . li 0 N ID ' 3 Ia' 0u IO 1 PA 4 10 4 17 -7 API 12 R I? F 0 IR i94RmC~ 2 PA 1 PA 2Q2 F ~ ~ q///II ~ IV FIR N 1 ! r OF 4 IoM s e i ID 20 u 24'FIR 21TIR gyp' 101 _J_] _Ij L 0600 S\II I U~/i \~XtIN7/~~~1L11X//~ \~IIU////fin I PA PA 4 - EA NTTN ' ~~l7JESI~f II y /xf y , AP d671rc / 40' FIR /V,27 FIR } - - _ f ~'0+~y~ GAT v N f OJU A Y QQ ppAA ATEMgg~~KKEEENTTH ~ + \ . ~n BE 6 P \ i ~11SQ\ WETL~NO BOUNDARY & CREEKE R3.5 8315 CONTENTS : R 3,5 I PHASE 3 LANDSCAPE PIM LANDSCAPE LEGEND R3,5 PROJECT: 20216 SN@4 cODUON NILE 92E/CDW. 9AONG _ , 60,ANW NAPE N PEES ~5 DRAWN BY : MS 6X BYe NoRy x'-3O' ]s• ac RF0 RN Go.ah6 pmrml 2 a o< AL° R At-. ' " R . e PHASE 3 LANDSCAPE PLAN N Arulmpl Pei f ml. 30' ae ors . manure TNe w Q W_ Boy' - (1/3 ah. GL 2/3 Om. bar) -t- tagaha+n Pym rAarma'M.tooU 6PH Rh. PNn.m Hmr VW. P,.,. 11•-3O' SS' ac Im ft- a- a-, 2e-»• a• a.. SCALE =1'=lY-0' 05 15 3D DATE : 8/4/04 ~ P Gmlem P_ 2- caL 15' as dv . menwa Oabah tnWagi Otragrpurea Am. Oo: PN mrap o'C5ml dw' ITS °ak w Sa 2 W i P.e RN R C:, D.0 2 go. S o d-4 - ' or w„Pm F'r •"s•-T is' ne Dy DP vb_ 2 go. 3• a.a I REVISIONS PLadd mmte 1 Sy 9,m!a ft- 2e-3°• - o._ Paa v dm1E2 tanmm prcmaa Imaatpwm 'Shan" K h.mu Eeaa 6'_ IC ac IG ramtu, G- I Td. 2.5' aa. Ma lm deo.ma Pembrlam aiapeanld.a N-dh• ~ .Y APma Rmle 1' cQ 25' ac CA C'My tM 390. . a P.a %%z t--t Catmvata •~~I pd. 37' a.a Aer pd-_ yeeinan tr.r -1. avtl5aa'Edwd 0wm.i W.-Na eamneri ta.IPN' PA Pa AA 2' rd. 31Y o.e OT PoNRan. so- 2 Oi Y o.e I, F,a .,.W 4mnwe' Sp:- brnalm'Wd6one' mtmam Pura cma RA R.~aod Am Tad ]0' as D ImW Dr_ PPa 2a'-b' 15' as 0 y°'"~~.iwy. pbga 2.• a.c i reauu. apw,Da RoWaod Carve 1Wr F Idn pygl .ii ae t m Red Odt r m. 3Y as N .npara AAee _ 2C-30• I wa. acapaa x• as . ' OxaP nArP PiPf1 %Wa^Pa Jmde xgnamwR PhS• SP S_W Phe 6'-T 15' as 9auT kaR° P ae ura rAaeabt. KO NWy(bgwd 15'-IB' Taa Coer ®ngla P49a tr- W na moll. 6•-T R' ae Cmua aeriaP lfebrli I Aar achauPn S-alan m'r,hmp MR PtR Iee'dimd Rau 2 Rd. Y'aa ldrn I ~1 Rwa : Lel6fad Phi' 0 E.61ea Oecwaa Tree tP Rm~ NR IIL-'IL Naa°P Rage 194 S a.c NOTES 1 Rmo tI- I. Ralala°m -.I trh urnpy aitb ob Imaaro. pd. r.mSmwU Db mr a m -_I 00 °rc Gape 24-30' 3• o.a Tipvd cmbWna al aPPa d. h !I Larwm aodrahna 2. N ro m amwea h 4am o 4N auuma° amvPwna PiGem. r +%g Emp Corte Ue 1. Rma Rk Tn' N DP r¢hNx pro d s' o,a Y ' os oaemapray 29& Ndoaema m.rna pRRR:CCIJ iA R(+Nt rcpad [tlm itN m by aR rR 6 p,- mR~6RG pdbtldR ~P`tlAh'a vlten pPrn59o: 1 ' F~~1 X01 I DCA AyN m~m O ~ T N i m 'g z 199.87' o N 4~ O Z p r 8 C N.b R I ~N o N 00"38'34" E 144.48' NO'56'34"E 187.09' NO'56'34"E .128.82' a r ~ CIL 50097'00"E 10.00' ,19'89l M .00,1L00 N GRAVEL ' m N ~Q Jr g r g~$ { " 42 IF1 ~ N ~ Z6 'M .Lf.9f.00 N ~ . 1 ¢ - ?~J H 1274 y1• E V r{ y1Z 70.41 m 2,1 2? z iJ1.80• GQ ~J - ~S I ro z~, ZZ 28 CL 228 127 2J1 ' ??3 ILZ ~f \ ?J? I ~I 22s tlZ 1 23 <26 ~£IZ. m ? z ml •O 22;p G7 iD 8 8 L2 !226 ill day J8 2.Jp g1Z IO ';Y 2J0 ? =1 A + ~~B ~sc~ M ffi 44 1u 7j OZZI v {v '!S l~3 v ~4 m ~3 0 i2 A. i A_ I ~ v R es ~ o 0 0- d 2 ~ F °pg "ZO __~'?49 g~v 'o' R. MINISTRY BUILDING = M?s w YN N spy @ p 71 MI, m 246 N~V p S/0015 wet .9 L6t may/ Sw 11 TH AV a ~s~ ee =-c c -c c - c _G -G - -c - c c - -c -c c ~-o - N G N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~,r 1a ~_.1 ~ ~lT' v A ati G^' 4L g' u b' .Ai Se S - S w r+i * S f"o & wi `d', a~n' X' f1 rv 1' o ~g §a WT_ w-w -w--w-yaw-w w-w w w w w w w ~-4 w. Z N• 1-1 . ~ gN D Ma Aug ° z z$ $S c v I r• r 1 1 25 c ' yI 0(,o f In M x m _ D. C ."'t1 U) C I.I I I I m ~$mcn0c z Om Cl) ' . m € ~ m Zi Tn r.' p m. n N Z^e FU,rm,,)rr_C M Foy St(.y D(,aW5 ~~nciC Pa.c efi Item No. Foy council Newsletter dated - 6 S MEMORANDUM TO: City Councilors. FROM: Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner RE: Tigard First Baptist Church. DATE: July 22, 2005 A Councilmember requested staff to reexamine the disputed access for the Tigard. First Baptist Church to see if there were any other alternatives other than Staff's recommendation and the Hearings Officer's. affirmation that the access on SW Gaarde be removed. The implied desire was to see if there was a way to work out a solution that would mutually benefit the applicant and satisfy the City's requirements. Following -the hearing on the .12th. of July, staff informally discussed the. matter with the applicant's-project manager who, expressed: his misgivings with.the City's position. Staff. advised the applicant's project manager that staff would,.continue to review.the facts with' a fresh set of eyes. Staff kept in contact with the project-.manager during this process. As with all appeals of city decisions, staff deliberates over the facts in the case and develops a,thorough, analysis of the issues to, present to the hearing body;. so that legal options and reasonable alternatives~are presented. Engineering staff, and planning, staff poured through the issues and found that the obstacle: remains; that is, the criteria in the code prevent an unrestricted access'on Gaarde. It should further be mentioned that staff had.tried to. find a solution:in the original decision, by looking at provisions for non-conformity, and a'close examination of the adjustment criteria. Unfortunately, similar to staff's initial determination, staff found. that the code language as written left no room for allowing the access onto SW Gaarde as requested. Staff contacted. the applicant's project manager to inform him of the outcome. If the council determines that the adjustment criteria have been inaccueately-,applied, then direction as to how the criteria should be applied will be needed. Without such direction, the problem will be that this Typ'e' II process Will'contain, largely,discretional criteria which would more appropriately, be a Type III process involving' a public hearing: MEMORA,ND•UM TO: City Councilors FROM: Morgan Tracy, Associate,Planner . RE: Appeal of CUP 2004-00005, Tigard First Baptist Church DATE: July 26, 2005 As Council is aware, the appellant requeste_ d this matter be continued from the July 12th hearing date to the July-26th hearing. The appellant'requested this additional time in' order to prepare and submit additional;supporting documentation and evidence in their argument against the denial of the requested adjustment to the access standards. The appellant's representative submitted a 16 page, memorandum along with 'a letter from Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue regarding "the need for emergency access, and •a letter from Charbonneau Engineering regarding the' lack of adequate sight distance at the intersection of SW 110th and SW Gaarde: Also, a letter from a nearby property owner. in support of the,Church's request.was received. Lastly, the appellant provided photographs of the site. These materials are enclosed. Staff has reviewed these materials against the Final Order, and finds that the Hearing's Officer's position is defensible in requiring, the elimination of access onto:Gaarde based . 'on strict application of the adjustment, criteria in the code. The Hearing's Officer erred however not including a provision to allow emergency.access to the site from Gaarde, and regardless of the outcome on the question regarding general access to the . site, staff recommends that at a minimum, Council modify..the decision to allow emergency' access consistent with the. discussion in the Hearings' Officer's final order, but not reflected in the final list of conditions. - , Summary oflssues A strict application of the adjustfnenf'criteria does not allow for an access on, Gaarde. The appellant argues that the provisions of 18.370.020.C.5 are' ambiguous; and as such an interpretation of those provisions is 'required. 'The stated ambiguity is,Whethler the six. review. criteria for granting an. adjustment must'all be; met or whether "some,of the, criteria may be balanced, by being weighted•more or less heavily than others:" The basis for this argument, is that the standard "based on the following criteria". omits the word "all," and should therefore not be read as "based on all the following criteria" as such similar language appears elsewhere in the chapter. I RESPONSE: Staff contends that the standard is-not ambiguous.. The lack of the word "all" is supplanted by the inclusion of the word "and" found at the end of the fifth criteria just ` prior to the final 'criteria. In standard language and code construction, the word "and" is . inclusive of all elements in the list. Should the word "or have'appeared instead, then only a single element of the criteria list would have to "apply. In other words, the term "all" is not necessary when the word "and" 'is included in the list. ' Staff is concerned that should Council resort to a standard of weighting the criteria, 'a detrimental. precedent is set for all subsequent development applications that may'seek an, access adjustment, rendering the adjustment criteria meaningless at worst, or at best' requiring direction from City Council at each application' of the standard. It would be hard to find an example of a case where. at least one of the adjustment criteria' would not be met. The result would be'that the standard would have no practical effect,, negating the need for the standard in the first place. ; The access as approved would not satisfy TVFR requirements The appellant has included a' letter from TVFR regarding the need for access on SW Gaarde based on the fire code which states.'where two. accesses are required they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum -overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line _between accesses!' Staff notes that this letter was received after the Hearings .Officer made"his. decision." and was not part of that'record Its introduction'in the record at this point is'valid as this is a'de novo hearing, and more importantly_is directly related to the item under appeal. ' TVFR has commented that they would prefer an open access to Gaarde, but that a .-locked gate "would be actable"_ 'The diagonal dimension of the property is _ approximately'714 feet. When phase 3 is complete, the dimension between the SW Gaarde access and the southern SW 110th access is 350'feet:; RESPONSE: Staff agrees that a modification to the conditions is necessary ' at a minimum to enable, the site to comply with TVFR requirements and be consistent, with the Hearings Officer's - discussion. Whether this condition allows an open access as preferred'by TVFR or a locked access as staff has originally recommended, is still a matter for Council's deliberation. However, consideration of the-circulation'issues discussed below should also be a part of this discussion.'' Lack of *a' n access on Gaarde results' in on=site circulation. problems-and leaves more traffic on the 'residential street (SW 110'). One of the "common sense" arguments that the applicant noted in the previous hearing was that without.an access on SW Gaarde, all visitors to the site are forced onto SW 110th Avenue adding traffic to this residential street. The adjacent neighbors supported' the applicant's- proposal to offload some of their traffic d'ifectly onto Gaarde as that lessened the burden-on the local street. 'Also, based on the applicant's site plan, the lower level parking area would be a 490 foot long. dead:end d'rive', causing' delays during peak parking periods and possible under utilization of the"parking area. With a through. route, drivers are more willing to "take their chances" at finding a parking spot since they know-that if one is not available, they.can`.circle~back around, instead of waiting' in-.a,line of other cars to turn around in the limited. dead end space. REPONSE: 1 One of staffs concems is that if this access were open and unrestricted, there is the potential for cut through traffic as drivers on either. fronting 'street attempt to avoid, the'. intersection of Gaarde and-SW 110th Avenue. An additional concern expressed at the ' previous hearing and in the staff report is that Gaarde 'Street, by its arterial, classification, should have limited access as provided for in the Transportation System Plan, adopted byCouncil in 2002. Should_ general access be allowed on SW Gaarde, staff would recommend that the northern driveway on SW 110th be eliminated. While this would have only limited impacts to the on site circulation, it would significantly compound the route through the site, making. it a 'less attractive option for such cut. through traffic, to occur. The site is only required to have two accesses, and this option is a reasonable method to limit; the amount.of'traffic that would use the-,.SW Gaarde• driveway. Sight Distance is not met for SW 110tH and SW Gaarde.intersection. Sight distance is, .a significant.problem, and. may be more problematic than the appellant's-issue with access on SW Gaarde: The condition of approval required that "the applicant's. engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification for.the intersection.of 110 Avenue and Gaarde Street,'Nith a' list of improvements required to meet the standard. The engineer shall use the posted speed of 35 mph .or the 85tH percentile, whichever is greater. The appellant has had a preliminary sight distance evaluation-conducted.-(Attachment--l- E-xhibit 1)which-determined-ihatthe-required'sight distance be 386 feet. With the vehicle positioned nearest to the travel lane, the greatest sight distance is 285 feet to the east: Sight distance to the'west was not'an,issue. The u appellant's engineer notes that to rectify this problem, it.will be necessary to modify or.; remove several trees and shrubs. The appellant argues that this should be a basis for . allowing the.,disputed driveway on Gaarde. RESPONSE:. , It is important for Council to, separate the issues;of sight distance with access spacing. While both are relevant aspects of traffic safety, -they are not part of the same standard. While the sight distance issue may be a reasonable argument to restrict or prevent access on SW Tie, it does not provide-the sole rationale. to open an additional access. on the arterial classification street it may be a sufficient argument to reason that. "there are no other alternative access points, on; the street in question or, from another street; " which is a key criteria that presently prevents. the' applicant's SW Gaarde access. If the access on SW 110th would direct the additional traffic from the development to an intersection ,where' inadequate sight distance exists, then the applicant could argue that access on SW 1 10th is not an altemative access point.- But that's not the case here. The applicant has claimed that more, not less access should be granted in light of this sight distance deficiency: Compounding the issue somewhat is the fact that, for the proposed number of parking spaces, two accesses are required. A single access on SW Gaarde would not meet this standard. Staff may be able to support an access on SW 110t' that did not direct traffic to the limited sight distance intersection, i.e. a left turn only exit from the site onto SW_ 110th with the requested second.access on SW Gaarde. Council must realize that this would continue to allow traffic onto the local street. Also, the appellant.must realize absent a change to the conditions as'written,. that if sight distance cannot,be achieved or best met with the recommended. improvements, the project would not be allowed to move forward, irrespective of the'disputed access. Other properties in the area were `granted additional accesses or access'that did not comply with the spacing standards during the Gaarde capital improvement project. A nearby resident submitted a letter.(Attachment 2), that requests "a clear explanation, as to why the 600 foot rule was not enforced just four blocks west on Gaarde.... the request is being made for a variance to a rule or code that the city has already made exceptions to just a few blocks away." Staff has identified that an additional driveway was constructed on Gaarde adjacent to St. Anthony's Cemetery. The cemetery has frontage on two roads, SW Gaarde (Arterial Road) and 115th Avenue (Neighborhood Route). An access already existed on SW Gaarde, about 235 feet from the intersection. Access'on 115th is not restricted in terms of spacing, but it must be at least 150 feet from the intersection. The existing'access on'115th meets that standard. The new additional driveway on SW Gaarde is about 200 feet west of the existing access on ' Gaarde, located directly opposite of 117th Avenue. RESPONSE: The' Capital Improvement Division Manager has provided an explanation for this driveway which is contained in the attached memo. Apparently, the driveway was "constructed to serve a vacant parcel adjacent to the cemetery, which at the time it was constructed it was not under the same ownership as the cemetery. Any future expansion of the cemetery onto this site will require conditional use approval, and staff will examine the access locations for that development at the time of application. Nevertheless, the case before Council is limited to the site presently under review. Conclusion An appeal requires that the Council' hold'the hearing to make findings and 'a decision. Staff understands the applicant would like to have an access on SW Gaarde as this would facilitate movement on and through the applicant's site; however, it is the responsibility of the City to ensure that the overall public (that is all members of the public, not just a limited section of the public) is not detrimentally impacted by development. The adjustment process provides an applicant the means to utilize his property if no other alternatives exist and it can be shown that the result will not negatively impact safety, but when `ah alternative exists, as is the case here, the Hearings Officer acted appropriately to deny the request. If the Council chooses another direction and approves the appellant's request, Council should direct the appellant to prepare the findings to support the alternate decision. This also requires Council to review the findings at a subsequent hearing for final adoption. Attachments Attachment 1 - Appellant's'Memorandum in support of the appeal, received July. 7, 2005. Exhibit A -Letter dated May 4, 2005 from TVFR regarding fire access'. Exhibit B.=Letter dated May 26, 2005 from•Charoonneau Engineering regarding sight distance for SW 110th and SW Gaarde' Attachment 2 - Letter from Gary E. Henry in support of the appeal, received July 18, 2005 Attachment 3 - Photos showing.' ight distance comparisons, received July 10, 2005 Attachment 4 -,Memorandum from Vannie Nguyen, CIP Division Manager, dated July 21, 2005. ` RECEIVED BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD CITY COUNCIL JUL U.7 ~QO3 G" OF TIGARD In'the Matter of the Appeal of the Decision of the ) Hearings Officer in CUP ) 2004-00005, SLR 2005-00005 - ) Applicant's Memorandum 00006, .VAR-2005-00016; - ) in Support of"Appeal• Tigard First Baptist Church, ) Applicant ) Nature of the Proceeding'and Relief Sought The City's Hearings Officer, on May 12,-2005, 'approved, with conditions, the Applicant's Conditional.Use Permit and.Sensitive ..Lands Review in CUP 2004-00005-and SLR 2005-00005 and 2005-00006, respectively.. The Applicant had proposed a 22`,500 square foot expansion to the existing church building and associated parking lot in the City's Low Density Residential (R-3.5) district,,with potential impacts to.an adjacent drainage way and steep slopes. The, I Hearings Officer also denied the Applicant's Adjustment, in VAR 2005-00016, to the City's atcess'and egress standards, which sought approval for a driveway from the Church's new parking lot to Gaarde Street within 600-feet of.the intersection with 110th Avenue. This denial was based on the.conclusions that "adequate alternative.access'is available to the site from SW 110`h Avenue," and "The additional traffic and congestion [at the intersection of 110th and Gaardel . . will not,. createa hazard." The Hearings Officer also found that "Inadequate sight distance at. .this intersection will create a hazard." The Applicant petitions the City Council to reverse.`the Adjustment decision of the Hearings Officer and approve the subject application with a driveway on Gaarde Street located 220 feet.west of the 110th Avenue intersection. Nature of the Judgment to be Reviewed Review is sought of the Hearings Officer's decision of May 12, 2005, entitled-. "Final Order; CUP 2004-00005 (Tigard First Baptist.Church)" (hereinafter "Decision") which was mailed.on May 12, 2005. Statutory Basis of Appellate Jurisdiction Appellant seeks review under CDC § 18.3,90-050.G as the applicant. Relevant Dates for Appellate Jurisdiction The Hearings Officer,'s decision was'mailed on May 12, 2005. The appellant's Appeal was fi 1 ed on May •25_, 2005, within 10 business days of the mailing of the decision, 'together with the re ui~ elda ---a-l-f ee - _ q ppe. -Thi smemorandum wasfiled on * Ju-`fy6; 2005. Jurisdictional Basis of Adency Action The City Council has jurisdiction over ;this decision of the Hearings Officer under CDC § iS A90.050,G. Summary of Material Facts. On March 29, 2005,.the Applicant, the First. Baptist Church of Tigard, applied to the City for a,conditional use permit, sensitive.l'ands review', and an-access adjustment. The Church proposed to construct a•4450 square-foot addition to the ex.ifsting 2 ; church building, together with. an expansion of the: existing church parking lot to accommodate 134 cars on. site, and an adjustment-to the City's driveway access standards" to construct a new driveway-on Gaarde Street approximately 220 feet west of the 110th Avenu.e•intersection..'As part of the development proposal,.the Church proposed to.construct another new driveway . on 110th Avenue, gi.ving'the.Church a.total of two driveways on 110th and one on Gaarde.Z On Apri.1 18, 2005, the. .City's staff published its Staff Report, recommending approval.. of the conditional use `permit: and sensitive lands review; subject to conditions,~'and 'recommending denial of the access adjustment. The applications were referred to the City's Hearings Officer pursuant to TDC § 18.310..320:3 The. Hea:ri-ngs Officer 'held a publ i c 'hearing on-April 25 2005 . - At that 'heari ng , he received.-testimony from the. Appl cant.'s_ architect, traffic engi nee-r.; . and proiect._..man_ager, '.and kept the '.record open :until May 2, 2005' for the Applicant to~ 1 TDC § 18.705.030.H.3 requires a setback•of 600•feet from any intersection on an arterial.street. Gaarde Street is an arterial. Z The Church al so'' proposed to. close the existing driveway, on Gaarde Street; which is located about 80 feet.west of the-110th,Avenue intersection. 3 Conditional use permits and sensitive lands, reviews are:Type III actions for which the Hearing's Officer is the_'approval authority:. Although access adjustments are Type II 'actions that may be 'approved by the Director, the adjustment action.-was consolidated •,with•.the other actions for approval by the` Hearings Officer. " 3• submit final. written. argument .,4 .,,,On May. 12, the Heari ngs, Offi cer issued his Final Order. and findings., In the findings, the Hearings, Offi cer. stated "the applicant failed.to bear the burden of proof that the application complies with TDC 18 A70.020.C(5) (b) (2).and (4), because adequate alternative access,is available to the site from SW 110th Avenue." Fi nal•, Order at 7. He went on. to find "The additional traffic and congestion will not exceed the capacity of streets or, -create a.hazard based on Mr. Charboneau's.expert.testimony.- fhere~.is .no substantial evidenc-e -to the contrary. Id. Then, he found "the applicant should be.required-to,provide an emergency..' vehicle access to•Gaarde Street if required by the Tualatin Valley Fire;District."Jd...at 8. Finally., he conc Tu.ded: The:applicant:is.required to'modify the•i.ntersection .[of .110th Avenue and Gaarde Street] if necessary,to provide adequate.sight distance: See conditions of approval 13'and 29. . All of the traffic from the proposed development Will travel through this intersection. Therefore the'hearings o f1 cer fi n`ds `tFia`t""this-:`conditi`on i-s -"°[n]-ecesaa-ry to ensure-"' ..the use is.compatible with other use in the vicinity; and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized." TDC 18.330.030.6..• Inadequate sight distance at this intersection will create a hazard and additional traffic generated by the proposed development will.exacerbate the hazard. Therefore, the applicant should be required to ensure that adequate sight 'distance is available. Id. „ . .4 On May 4, 2005,,,Tualati'n Valley Fire and Rescue submitted written comments. Since these comments were not received by the City before May•2, they were not considered in the Hearings Officer's' decision. A copy of those writ-ten comments _is'attached hereto as Exhibit A, and is'incorporated by.reference herein.. 4 The Hearings Officer went on to condition' the approval of the- conditional use permit with completion a preliminary sight distance certification for the Gaarde Street intersection, based on the posted speed limit,. of 35 miles per hour:-,"The applicant's' engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification using the correct speed, for the intersection of Gaarde'Street and'110`h Avenue along with.a list of required improvements, with their Public Facilities-Improvement (PFI) permit application.." Id. at 16.'. Finally, the Hearings Officer.concluded that,-under TDC § 18.390.040.B.2.e, the impacts of the Church's proposed development would result in an-$8937 value of unmitigated impacts. This value would result after dedication of additional right-of-way on its 110th.Avenue frontage, along with half-street improvements along that frontage. Id, at 36': The instant appeal ensued. STANDARD OF'REVIEW ORS 227.17.5(10)(a) provides that 5 The applicant's.traffi`c engineer has completed an analysis of ' the intersection using the 35 mi1e'per hour, speed limit. He has concluded that the sight distance to the east (looking toward Highway .99) is 218 feet for a vehicle stopped on 110th Avenue to enter Gaarde Street.at the painted stop`,bar. If the vehicle advances to near the closest travel lane on Gaarde Street, the sight distance to the'east increases to 285• feet. At a posted speed limit of.,3.5 'mi 1 es per hour, the AASHTO required sight.distance to the east is 386 feet. A copy of the memorandum from Charboneau Engineering; dated May 26,..2005, is' attached at Exhibit B, and is incorporated herein by reference. An appeal froma hearings officer's decision shall be-made to the planning commission or to the governing body of the city. An appeal from such other person as the governing -body designates shall be, to a hearings officer, the planning commission or the governing body., In either case,. the appeal shall be'a de novo.hearing. -APPELLANT'S ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR The Hearings Officer,exceeded,his jurisdiction, and misconstrued the applicable law when he found the proposed access to Gaarde Street could not,be approved because adequate alternative access was available on- 110th Avenue, even ,though he found,, the intersection of 110th Avenue and Gaarde Street already was hazardous, and egress of all Gaarde Street traffic .from the Church's site through that intersection would exacerbate that hazard. ARGUMENT The City Council may interpret the ambiguous language of Section TDC.§ 18.370.020.C.5, governing-access,and egress adjustments, to'conclude that the approval criter4 may be balanced such that the new Gaarde Street driveway may be approved - ° =b°e:c-au se - i t wi 1-1- resul t-i n safer--acres-s ;---eve-i-f---an=,al=te r-na-t--iiwe- access point on 110th Avenue is available,, but that alternative results in a more hazardous i nters.ect'i on of,(110th Avenue and Gaarde Street., TDC § 18.705.030.L authorizes the'Director to restrict the location of driveways when that location would "a. Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions,; or b. Provide.i,nadequate access.. for emergency vehicl,es." The-applicant sought an adjustment'to the City'.s access. and egress standards to establish.a new driveway on.Gaarde,Street -about 220 feet west of the '110th Avenue intersection. TDC § 18.705.030. H.. 3 'requi r6s "The mJ n'i'mum- s.paci ng _of-',dri veways and r streets..along an arterial. shal'1. be:, 600 feet:" . " The_,City's procedures governing.access,and egress.. ' adjustments are found. .n .TDC'. § 18;.370.0270 ,C. , 'Subsection 5 . a, of ` " that, section provides-.'that,"the Di-rectormay,grantan adjustment to the access requirements of Chapter 18..70.5 using approval criteria contai ned i h Subsecti on. 2b • [si c] -be l ow'.` 71 Subsection. 5-.b then-1 provides "I • The 'Di•rector-may approve, approve with condi-tions, or deny' a request, 'for` an, adjustment from the access re.quirements'.eontained in,:Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: . :(2),.There are no other a.lternati:ve access points on the 'street i n~'questi on or from . another•street;=. ; .(5) The approved" access or access 'approved wi'th:"conditiohs.wi-ll, result= in safe access;;... Since the provisions of TDC § 18.370.020'are ambiguous those -p.r'ovi si ons must.; be interpreted by the City `COUnci 1 The Hearings Officer made.no`su:ch,i.nte'rpretation: -It is wel:l.. establ'i shed: that In i nte.rpret'i ng the meaning of a .focal code, the focus :i s' ,on'Ai scerni ng th'e .,intent of he., body. that adopted , the code -.p`rovi si ons. The sta'rti ng• poi•nt of th-e'. ' analysis.. i_s'the •code's.,text and context..- If the text and context can r-easonably.:be,.construed'in'more 'than one way,.. examination of ,l eg'i sl ati ve' hi story i is app,ropr':i ate If 1 egi sl ad ve'~ hi'story' is 'uncl ear, after- consideration of the text, context and legislative hi story,:. then. reso.r, to -g.enera'1; maxi ms`. of. statutory. const.ruc•t';i on,`i s p e r m i ssi.bl e.' Kent, Ci ty'of, Port' l and, `39"'Or LUBA' 455,, 458 • (2'001) (ci"ting"' inter a1ia Hay v-. 'City `of,Ca'nnon Beach', .'17.0r- LUBA 322. 326 (1995) ; PGE v.. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Orr 606,. '610', 859 P2d 1143 (1993)) In making an interpretation , :the" critical issue i s; whether TDC § 18.370.020.0.'5 requires an ,access and egress-.adjus•tment to comply with a77•1i;sted'approval cr ;teria.'. LUBA. has held that"'` ` local ;gove.rnmen , o,rdi nance,p'rovi'si ons that permit variance approval that a,re worded "only i n event that' a 17 of the. ;fol l owl ng circumstances exist" and "on Ty if 'findings are made : based on.'the . . . 'cri_teri a 1 i sted below; " r,equi re variance approval 'onl'y'ri`f all of,-the' 1 i ste'd. o r ;;fol-l owing. criteria are' sati s f i e'd Lovejoy` v. . City of `Depoe Bay, 17' Or LUBA 51;• 52--(1'988) . (emphasis added).. See 'also Roberts V. 'City. of. Gearhart; 38.0x; LUBA 407, - 409' (2000) (emphasis added) rr. The text`an'd context of TDC.q 18.:370.020.C.5'.b~do not require 'that all listed. adjustment 'criteria be ful l v °sati sfi ed sfiows purposefuh omission olr- "aTl-:`" `In examining•,the text;'.TDC''§.:`18.370'.020:C.5'".b pr.ovi'des that- an. access adjustment may, be approved '"based ow the. following . cri feria Li sted thereaf,,te,r;'are' ,6',crfteri a;: including dile , addressing :alternative access.points, and one addressing safe. access.' PGE 'v:. % Bureau of Labor and Industries mandates, that "an. 6 It does not appear` tFiat the other;,standards' of :TDC 18.870.020. C, 5-. b are J n. questi on. It. is, ' undi sputed _I'(1) It •i 's 'not possi.bl a to share access;' (3) ,The access requirements ,.[on Gaarde Street] cannot be'me.t; (4) The request is -the minimum:adjustment to .provide adequate access;: [and] (6) U6 'visu'al clearance requirements of.Chapter;18.795:[35feet for arterial.. streets]' wi 11 be 8 i merpretati on should not insert what has been omitted or omit, that which has been inserted:•317 Or at 611 (citing ORS -174.010). In compari son:..to,; Subsection C.:S , , the' text of Subsecti on B.. 2•, provi des...,,!k Bevel o'pment adj ustment 'shal 1 be granted if there is a demonstration of compliance with a17 of the'applicab] e standards. Thus, if the drafters 6f'Subsection'-C.5 had intended to,require "all of the following criteria -to be fully satisfied; they would. have used -the word "al 1 just as they did in Subsection.B.2. The omission of -the words `."only" :and "all" from, Subsection C_. 5, and the; •i,ncl usi on in Subsection B,.2 of the word "all must 'have been purposeful The.phrase, "based on the following criteria" 'does not mean, "based"on a 7 7, of .the following criteria." This.leads to the conclusion that "based on the ..`fo-l1owing criteria" i.n Subsection C.5 means'that some of the criteria may be. balanced by -bei n'g weighted more,or less heavily" than others. In weighing subsections .(2). and : (5) of TDC § 18.370,020.C.5: b i n the A nstant":case, any interpretation must consi der. an "•apparent conflict between ,those subsections. Criterion (2) literally :means no adjustment should be approved if. an alte,rnative'access,'cn:avoid•the necessity for.the adjustment. In the instant case it is undisputed that a new, second access on 110th Avenue can .avoid the,need to, have any-,access on Gaarde Street. .The,Gaarde Street.acce!;,s is the subject matter of the met." 9 requested' adjustment: n' On the other hand, criterion (5) literally means that the approved (alternative] access must, be'safe. ';The. Hearings Officer has found that the intersection- of. 110th"Avenue-and'Gaarde Street is hazardous. He also`has found that when all "traffic from the Church exi-ts onto ,110th,Avenue, that traffic wi11-pass through'' that intersection, and will make-the intersection more hazardous. Thus, compliance with ;criterion- (5) mandates the% adjustment, ' . providing access onto Gaarde:Street to avo-id that intersection. - ' Subsections (2)' and (5) a"re in di rect confl i ct : (2)-requi res' no access on Ga.arde.-Street,. but (5) requires access-o'n Gaarde Street.. This reinfortes. the conclusion that.these criteria,mu-st be balanced: ; Context suggests alternative access should be used,if safety concerns can be mitigated:. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan-is within the context " . of TDC § 18.370.020. :Section. III.-1 of 'the'' Transportation element of the Resource' Document'; 'Volume IY, .of' the Plan provide's that "Direct access to arterials from',individual residences' or commercial or industrial.uses shall be.,proFiibited,'unless no other practical access existsSection V:D.3.b of the Also in the context of,Subsection C'. 5' fi s the "purpose" section of TDC § 18.370.020:. Subsecti:on.s,A:l and A.2. ,However, these is,. nothing in the l'an'guage- of ~ ei ther of those, subs'ecti ons .that aids' in the interpretation of Subsection C.5. 8 The recommended driving speed for arterials'is shown in this ,,section as 40 to 55 miles per hour. The recommended driving speed for Transportation element.of the Resource'.Document,.,Volume, IT 'of the- Plan provides that roadway hazards,impairing the. safety of those using the roadway include"Inadequate sight distance caused by poor roadway alignment, vegetation,or,other objects." Vol. IT P1 an . at ..243. Section 8.1.3.e-of the, Fi n,di ngs., policies and- Implementation Strategies, Volume.I1, of..the P1 an provides that, as a condition of development approval, "Street improvements be made and street signs or.,si gnals - be provided when the development is found to create or i ntensi fy a traffi c hazard." Vol. II, Plan- at II-55. These Plan provisions together would appear to suggest that, an interpretation of the.access'adjustment's criteria of al ternati ve 'access, poi nts, and safe access might balance in favor of alternative access points on .110th Avenue. Of cou rse ,,',PGE v... , Bureau of Labor and Industries also requires that- ".`where there,., are several'provisi_ons or particulars such construction is, if possible , to be adopted a•s w.i l l gi ve effect to al l 307 Or at 611 (citing ORS 174.010)., The Plan does permit effect to be given to both -cr'iteri,a if street improvements are made to- mitigate. the hazard'. Plan at II-55. However, the reduction of speed on Gaarde Street to 35 miles pe,r hour - the speed for major collectors - undercuts the Plan mandate that access by commercial major collectors. is 35-40 miles per hour. At this recommended speed,, "Direct access to major collectors from indivi"dual residences shall,be prohibited unless no other feasible option.exists." Vol I, Plan at 224. Although Gaarde Street i.s,an arterial, it has.the posted speed of a major collector: 11 (and arguably nonprofit) uses.: shout d be prohi bi ted'on 'arterials. On major collectors; such access is, fully 'permissible. Thu&,'it could be concluded that criteria (2) and (5) may be balanced by using alternative access (in this case, on 110th Avenue) as long'as intersection improvements,'can make that access safe.. However, access on Gaarde Street is permissible if access on 110th Avenue is impracticable because those intersection safety improvements cannot be imposed as a'conditi'on.of approval'. Moreover; TDC § 18.705 30.1.1 also is within the context of. TDC § 18.370.020.C.5. It provides that the Director may restrict access and "require.the location of driveways*be.placed on adjacent streets" when-a driveway would""a. 'Cause or increase' existing hazardous traffic conditions or ,b Provide inadequate , access. for' emergency vehicles.' TDC § 18.705:30.L.1. This provision, suggests that an interpretation of the''access : adjustment's criteria of al ternati.ve access point's and safe access might balance.in favor of safer access on Gaarde Street. The applicant cannot be required to make the necessary public improvements to the 110 Avenue intersection to make that intersection safe. The report/ of the Church's traffic engineer at Exhibit B specifies that the interference with sight distance at the intersection iis,Caused by "the existing vegetation,located on„at least two private properties fronting along'Gaarde Street east of the intersection,"' Those'two.private properties` just east of " 110th Avenue, Tax .Lots 1800 and 1900, have a total of 170.24: 12 lineal feet of frontage on•Gaarde 5,treet. Those two lots have assessed land values averaging about $9.50, per square foot.9 Assuming that,20 foot wide strips fronting-Gaarde Street could be acquired from, the owners of,those two lots,(both of which have single family dwelli.ngs),- the cost to the Church would be about $32,345. The Hearings Officer's decision shows that there is only $8937 of estimated value of unmitigated costs in his rough proportionality analysis.. Decision at 35.10 The addition'of an additional $32,34511 of mitigated costs causes the.costs of the conditions imposed to fa.r.exceed the estimated. value of impacts, causing the.'conditions to not be roughly proportional and . unjustified. Right of way acquisition on Gaarde Street to. improve sight dista6ce,may not be'A mposed as a condition,of approval .lZ 9 The Hearings Officer's report-shows the right of way on 110th Avenue required:to be dedicated by the Church a's a condition of approval is estimated to be valued at $3.00 per-square. foot. Decision at 35. Residential land values are-shown in assessor information to be much higher. One parcel has an assessed value of,,about $9.43 per square,foot; the other has a value of-about $9.61 per square foot. to The Hearings Officer found that•the proposal would have $74,925 of full impact traffic costs, $23,976 of estimated TIF assessment, and $42,•012 of mitigated costs. Decision at 35. "..This figure does not reflect costs for.removal. of vegetation interfering with,sight'd.istance,. nor severance damages to the adjacent properties for the removal.of that vegetation.. lz Although view easements would be.the likely property interests acquired from the owners of tax Lots 1860.and 1900, the value of'-those easements probably closely•approximates the assessed.value of the properties in question due to the preclusion of any developmental 13 CONCLUSION. In,conclusion the City Counci-1 -may i nterp'ret the' ambiguous access and egress adjustment provisions'of TDC §.18.370.020.C.5. to conclude that access on Gaarde Street may be. al l owed even- if alternative access on 110th Avenue is available; when that. alternative access. wi 1.1 not result-in safe access. The text of the adjustment provisions shows that not al ,l criteria must necessarily be complied with, and may be balanced against each other. On•balance, the context of the.adjustment provisions indicates that the alternative access criterion may be outweighed by.the safe access criterion, particularly if the alternative access increases hazardous conditions and.provides inadequate emergency vehicle access. .The Hearings Officer found that "the applicant should be required to provide.an emergency vehicle access to.Gaarde Street if required by the Tualatin Val ley Fire District'." Decision at 8. The Fire District letter of May 4 states The proposed new parking area located to the West of the buildings will need to have-access to' Gaarde due to ' .the. "remoteness". "requi•rement 'found in Condition' #5 below. The Fire District would prefer that this parking area be provided with an open access to Gaarde. An access with'.a locked 'gate woul.d al'so'be.acceptable. Exhibit A-1. Thus, not only does the denial of the adjustment to.allow Gaarde uses or landscaping taller,.than'ground cover on those properties. Moreover' it is not clear that the City will condemn such interests, or, barring that,, the Church can purchase those i nterests from the owners of those tax lots in arms' length transactions. 14 Street access and egress exacerbate-the hazard at the, 110th Avenue intersection, but it also.denies the emergency access, and egress from Gaarde. Street that the Fire District requires.. The Heari ng-s Offi ce.r apparently,, attempted to resolve this, problem by approving a,Gaarde Street access for emergency-, vehicles only.. However,, the Hearings Officer never explained. how. .it is permissible to approve an access and egress adjustment on,', Gaarde Street for emergency vehicles, but is impermissible to . approve that same adjustment, for Church traffic on Sundays.. The Church proposes to the Council that the access and egress Adjustment be approved subject to'the condition: that the driveway be gated and locked 'as specified in the Fire District . letter at Exhibit'A. The gate may be opened and used for vehicular access and egress by, the Church only from'5:OOpm.on- Saturdays until 6:00pm on Sundays, and from. 5:00,pm Christmas Eve until 6:00pm Chri s,tmas Day. This conditioned, adjustment approval avoids making the intersection.of 110th Avenue more hazardous, and avoids the complex, costly and problematic option of acquiring view easements to improve sight distance east of that intersection. At the.same time, the approval meets the-Fire District requirement for a Gaarde Street access. Establishment of this dri veway. on Gaarde-. Street 220 feet west-of the i.ntersection Outs the driveway well;beyond the AASHTO required sight distance to , the east of 386 feet. This makes the Gaarde Street driveway a.- . 15 , safe access and egress for both Church traffic on ,Saturdays and -Sundays and. emergency vehicles at any time. At the same time, it. avoi ds any possi.bl e` confl i ct on Gaarde Street wi th traffic entering from 110th Avenue'during'peak periods'during the week. The Church respectfully asks the,City Counci1'to,:-everse the decision'of the Hearings-.Officer and approve the proposed adjustment, with conditions' as discussed above.' DATED this-6th day of 141y, 2005. Respectfully.-submitiedi David B. Smith '6950 -SW 'Hampton Street Suite 232 Tigard, OR 97223=8331 (503).624-9352 Attorney for Applicant, Tigard First Baptist Church, 0514'-003.MEM ' 16 ' TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE SOUTH DIVISION • COMMUNITY SERVICES OPERATIONS FIRE PREVENTION Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue May 4, 2005 Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Tigard First Baptist Church Dear Morgan, , Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed :site plan.surrounding the above named. development project. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue endorses this proposal predicated on the following criteria and. conditions of approval: 1) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. The proposal was submitted appears to provide access to within 150' of all portions of all buildings. It Is noteworthy that the existing access from Gaarde SL was reconstructed due to Improvements to Gaarde SL and is too steep to allow entrance by all Fire District apparatus. 2) DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. The proposed new parking area located to;the.West of the buildings•will need to have access to Gaarde due to the "remoteness" requirement found in Condition #5 below. The Fire, District would prefer that this parking area be provided with an open access to Gaarda. An accesswifh a /b~K¢al~at~wo~ld~lsn ~~oc~pt~bI~IP`a-gate-is~iristalle~ol-andyacked,~~hall be provided.,with a Knox brand lock and meet the requirements of Condition # 10 below. 3) ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS -COMMERCIAL: Where buildings exceed 30 feet in height or three stories in height shall have at least three separate means of fire apparatus access. Buildings or facilities having a gross area of more than 62,000, square feet shall be provided with at least.two separate means of fire apparatus access. Buildings up to 124,000-square feet provided with fire sprinklers may have a single access. 4) AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with approved fire apparatus access roads; capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power line's shall not be kx ted within the aerial fire apparatus access roadway. Fire apparatus access , roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet in the immediate vicinity of any building or portion of building more than 30 feet in height. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building; and shall be - , positioned parallel to one entire side.of the building. 6) REMOTENESS: Where two access roads are required, they shall be placed a'distance.apart equal, to not.less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses.. . 6) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less t`XN~Q IT "q" than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 75,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will.be capable of supporting such loading. 7) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 28 feet and 48 feet respectively, measured from the same center point. 8) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted red and marked 'NO PARKING FIRE LANE° at approved intervals.. Lettering shall have a stroke of,not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red background. 9) GRADE: Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed 10 percent. Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%) with the exception of crowning for water run-off. When fire sprinklers are installed, a maximum grade of 15%-may be allowed. The approval of fire sprinklers as an alternate shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of ORS 455.610(5). 10) GATES: Gates securing fire apparatus roads shall comply with all of the following: Minimum unobstructed'width shall be 16 feet, or two 10 foot sections with a center post or island. Gates serving one- or two-family dwellings shall be a minimum of 12 feet in width. Gates shall beset back at minimum -of 30 feet from the intersecting roadway. Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type Manual, operation shall be capable by one person Electric gates shall be equipped with a means for operation by fire department personnel Locking devices shall be approved. ; 11) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS -REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less as calculated using IFC, Appendix B. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office: 12) FIRE'HYDRANTS -COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. This distance maybe increased to 600 feet for buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 13) FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: The minimum numberand distribution of fine hydrants . , available to a buldng shall not be less than that fisted in Appendix C, Table C 105.1. - -Eonsiderations=forulacirt"re--hydrants=maT-be=as=follows:=--- Existing hydrants in the area,may:be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved. Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants unless approved by the fire code official. ` • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets only as ; approved.by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved.by the fire code official.. 14) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. 15). REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations, shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly 16) FIRE HYDRANTIFIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 100 feet of a fire department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. FDCs shall normally be remote except when approved by the fire code official. 17) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION. Approved fire' apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site., 18) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required. for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's. Office for an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. . Please contact me at (503) 612-7010 with any additional questions. Sincerely, Eric T. McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal J ,~~•7, ' _ .ter' - • FNG N G u~c Date: May 26;. 2005 To; David Smith, Attorney _ copy: Jim Wilson jim@tigardfirstbaptist.com 6950 SW Hampton Street Tigard First Baptist Church Suite.232, ' Tigard OR 97223 From: Frank Charbonneau, P`E.G ` .Subject: Intersection Sight•Distance FL05142 SW 1.10' Avenue at Gaarde Street, Tigard In, response to your request we have reviewed the intersection sight distance situation at SW' 1.10`h Avenue and Gaarde Street in Tigard. A field survey.was conducted this week to measure and record the available sight distance in both directions along Gaarde Street from the stopped approach on 1 1Uh Avenue. ; For this determination a-travel speed of,35 MPH was applied in conformance with the current posted speed. Following the standards and criteria established in AASHTO the required sight distance at the intersection needs to be 386 feet. -The survey revealed that fora vehicle stopped on 11 dh Avenue at the normal position (vehicle front at the- stop bar) the sight distance is 298 feet looking to the east and 207 feet looking to the west. When the vehicle.,s-stop position is-advanced to near the adjacent travel lane edge the sight distance increases to 285" feet in the east direction an,d over 1,060 feet in Based on this investigation it has been determined that the sight distance in the east direction'' from 1 1 Vh. Avenue does not meet AASHTO's minimum sight distance requirement of 386 feet. The sight distance restriction is due to the existing vegetation located on at least two private properties 'fronting along Gaarde Street east of the intersection. In order to mitigate this condition it will, be necessary to modify or remove several trees and shrubs. At this time no mitigation.-in the westerly direction will be necessary. However, the. existing shrubs located on the Church's property will require sufficient ri~aintenance to insure•they do not degrade -the current sight distance that-'is available. Please contact Frank Charbonneau, P.E. if you should have,any.questions. 9370 SW Crreenburg Road; Suite 4,11; Portland, OR 97223 • Phone: (503) 293-1118 • Fax: (503) 293-1119 Df/ July 15, 2005 RECEIVED PLANNING Morgan Tracy, Staff Planner. JUL-, 1 8 2005_ City ' f Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.'' CITY OF TIGARD Tigard, OR 97223. Dear Morgan, Enclosed please find my letter to the City Council in support of the request for variance VAR 2005-00016 for Tigard First Baptist Church. Please place this letter before. the .City Council at. least 7 days prior to the continued ' hearing.,. P e se call if you have any questions: n rely c E. my 14111 So West 120`" Pla Tigard, re on 97224 (543)7.,93-0658 RECEIVED PLANNING July 10, 2005 ti a . , . , , - ~ . JUL•-1 8. 2005 . ' Tigard City Council - ' ' • • - City of.Tigard. ~✓1YOF TIGARD: '13125 SW Hall Blvd: Tigard, OR 97223 RE: ' Letter in support of Appeal of Hearings Officer's Decision ' . First Baptist Church of Tigard (VAR) 2005-00016 Dear City Council Members; . My name is Gary.Henry and my family and I reside at 14111 SW 1200' Place, ' Tigard, Oregon: I have lived in Tigard for over eight years and my home is just off of SW Gaarde St. and a very short distance from Tigard First Baptist Church. I am not a member of the church. I want to first thank each of you for'your service to the city and community of Tigard. I also want to thank you for the opportunity and privilege to express my c: opinion to the council on the matter of the church's driveway access to SW Gaarde St. I have read and studied the findings of the hearings officer'and I believe that I'' have a reasonable understanding of the issues involved. I understand that there is, what I will refer to throughout this letter•as, a 600 foot rule. The problem as I understand it is that the church is unable to move their, . Gaai•de St. driveway 600 feet-away from the intersection of .110'h and Gaarde 5t, because they do not have enough property along Gaarde. I do understand that they ---are-willing to=move4t-as-far-awa-yfr-om=the-subject-inter-seetion=as=possible,-wh eh=is-- around 220 feet. I have walked to the sight and can see that the sight distance is over 400 feet in both directions from the proposed location of the driveway. My understanding is that in a speed zone of 35 miles per hour the required sight distance is 386 feet. ' Moreover, most of the church's traffic will occur on Sundays when the traffic flow is traditionally lighter than.week days. The church's request is not only very logical but I see it as the only reasonable and fair conclusion: As a side benefit it will. assist the residents on and around 110f Street by reducing traffic on` that street and not . plugging an already'troublesome intersection, at 110 and SW Gaarde St. I experienced the construction on SW Gaarde St. around a year ago. I watched as the city crew created a new driveway for St. Anthony's Cemetery on SW Gaarde- St., in addition to their present driveway on Gaarde. Neither the-new driveway nor the old existing driveway is 600 feet from the intersection of 115'h and SW Gaarde St: I would appreciate a clear. explanation as to why the 600 foot rule was not,enforced just four blocks west on Gaarde. The church is simply requesting to keep the access that.they have had for over forty years, but relocate it further away from the subject intersection. Although it does not create the desired 600 foot separation it does create a safer sight distance than. does their existing driveway. It also provides more sight distance than does the intersection of 110ei and Gaarde. •I am very aware of the fact that a city; like any organization, has to have rules and regulations to operate effectively, fairly and efficiently: Our lives are filled with rules, regulations and codes which we need. to obey and live by. When an organization adopts a set of rules, then along with that comes the need or responsibility to apply and enforce those rules in a fair, consistent and equitable manner. It appears to me that the church has approached their desire to expand their facility by paying their fees and applying for their permits for development.Mithin that process they are asking for what appears to be a very reasonable variance or adjustment to maintain good traffic flow on and off of their property. The request is being made for a variance to a rule or code that the. city has already`made exceptions to just a few blocks away. If the city, allows one SW Gaarde St. property owner a second new driveway within 6001eet of an intersection with no paperwork or permit, I feel that.it is only fair and reasonable to grant the church'an adjustment of an existing driveway: Asa productive and responsible citizen•of the Tigard• Community and a local neighbor of the church I would strongly urge the.council to grant the requested var-ianee for-the-Gaarde-dr-iveway., I would be more than happy to discuss this matter further and-1 can be reached at (503) 793-0658. Thank you again for your service to our community and I feel confident that the council will find a reasonable, yet fair and equitable resolution to this request for the variance., Si erely % E. my •141 S 20~ Place Tigard, Or gon 97224 DAVID B.. SMITH , . ATTORNEY AT LAW 050 S.W. Hampton,Street, Suite 232 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)624-9352 Fax,(503)598=3028 ,July 18,-2005 Mr. Morgan Tracy; Staff-Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Appeal of Hearings Officer's Decision, First Baptist Church,. of Tigard -File Nos CUP 2004-00005. SLR 2005-00005, SLR 2005-00006 VAR 2005-'00016_, Our File No.: 0514 Dear Mr. Tracy: Enclosed,-for filing please find the original and six copies of the photographs showing six different views:of the Gaarde Street 110th Avenue intersetti,onThese photographs are for.review. and consideration.by the City Council during its continued Appeal Hearing of the Hearings Officer's Decision,of the Appellant, First Baptist Church of Tigard, in the'above referenced..matter. Please place this these . photographs before 'th'e. City Council . prior t-o :o-r--=at the _con.tinued--hear.i-ng on July 261x-2005. -Thank--you.. Please call me if you have questions. Very truly' yours, David.B: Smith Attorney for First Baptist Church of Tigard encl j cc: Mr: Jim Wilson, First Baptist Church of Tigard. 05147008.TRN PHOTO 1 Intersection of 110th Ave. and SW Gaar-de St.. LOOKING EAST 4j- s.e ka-tf. t~T»`~ s' ,,7 ~i J;.a,e"'a4xi?~ 9'~,j ~ ~ y~ ♦ V ~ 4 fb~ }1} 'Wi't/ C4" 22k'tt'ly`.~~ t a a ~.t ??w~ pY- k t~ 'yJ• ~ . kGZty:,~ ,~X.. "S" tt 'ab 4',9~ ,yc~ > Y+ t. S .r PHOTO #1 is the, view.from an automobile at the normal position (vehicle front at the Stop Bar). Sight distance is 218 ft. Distance required: 386 ft. #2 PHV U Gaarde,St. ~.1 ptn Ave. and SW intersection -of EST LOOKJNG S ,t VVjM.{#. ~,P r,~ u.Ry,',u d'- } fan ~"g' r F .ty ff.'s'{, 3 ~ '~5` a-k~~ +'euc~? ~ .ot -r"'L ~4x•~s;`_'','`k. a`'~24:is.~ ~t.,F.t~ s Y~'tt` 4 4~, ' 4I1 ,r U utomobile at. the #2 is the view from an the Stop Bar)' PHOTO Vehicle front at normal Position t 386 ft- ft, Distance required Sight distance is 207 VMVTO Intersection of 110th Ave. and SW Gaarde St. LOOKING EAST s ~-3id,~'.r/.C ~~!q, s}>~ i? o y ',shy S •S'°. `R F„'~•ityf#(iJ t a 3 7 I t QU, PHOTO #3 .is the view from an automobile that.'has advanced, beyond the-Stop Bar and! near the adjacent travel lane. Sight distance m increased' to 218 fit. :.Distancerequired: 386 ft. OT #4 Intersection of 110th Ave. and SW Gaarde St. l LOOKING WEST y} L~ kt It e } PHOTO #4.... 'is the view from .an automobile that has advanced beyond the Stop.Bar and near the adjacent travel lane.. Sight distance, is increased. .to-over 1000-ft. Distance required: 386 ft. I. 0 'PHOTO, 5 Proposed relocated driveway onto SW Gaarde St: LOO KI N GEAST 0 RIP 9, EOM,41,47, 2,01 l it )~.PStd 1 ~ .`-r { ~ '~=dot 4 35 _ i 4e -1 'J F u{ n ; f'II I S" - 1 yr Z E'' s to ! 4t r !r PHOTO #5 is the,view from an.automobile that would be-in position to-enter SW 'Gaarde 'StArom the proposed driveway location. Sight distance is 475 ft. Distance required: 386 ft.' PHOTO #6. Proposed relocated driveway onto. SW Gaarde St. LOOKING WEST s C t xiq a Ir { iT ^~Ku any r ns~St tp+ i ME' PHOTO #6 is the view from an automobile that would be in position to enter SW. Gaarde St. from the proposed driveway location. Sight -distance is over -1000 ft., Distance required,: 386 . ATTACHMENT 4 CITY OF TIGARD Engineering Department ShapingA Better Community MEMORANDUM . CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone 503-639-4171• Fax: 503-624-0752 TO:' Gus Duenas City Engineer FROM: Vannie-Nguyen CIP Division Manager DATE: July 21, 2005 SUBJECT:. Driveway, on Gaarde Street Adjacent to the Existing Cemetery During the construction of Gaarde Street Improvements Phase 1 (Highway 99W to 121St Avenue), the City provided a driveway into Tax. Lot No. 2S103.CD03400. This tax lot is west of and immediately adjacent to the existing cemetery. For lots that have direct access to an existing collector or arterial and are not served by a side street or an interior street system, the City would typically provide access as. part of the project. Early in 1999, the City's design consultant met with many of,the property owners along Gaarde Street to discuss details of the improvements. for the project. The Turnbulls on that. tax. lot at 11735 SW Gaarde Street were in the process of selling a 1.5-acre parcel to the Roman Catholic Archbishop ,of Portland in Oregon. The parcel had an existing gravel turnout into an empty field for mowing access. The property owners requested that access be maintained and that a concrete driveway be installed with` the road improvements at the location.of the existing gravel entrance. Our consulting engineer discussed this request with the City's private development engineer.- The driveway to the tax, lot was approved with a minor adjustment to line it up with 11701 Avenue on the opposite side of the street. The'driveway was shown on the plans throughout all the public': meetings and plan approval process, and was. constructed in accordance with the plan. c: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner, CD Department " !Y)C ~~-r+cK~ Address to Tigard City Council Tuesday, July 26; 2005 ~I RE: Gaarde' St. Driveway Appeal 46 Good evening. My name is Steve McCracken. I live at 16412 SW Luke Ln., here in Tigard. I have served as Senior Pastor of Tigard First Baptist'Church for 12 years. I plan to stay at that post until I'm old! Thank you Mayor Dirksen (dirk-sen) and council members for this opportunity to participate in'a decision you will make that has great implications for our church and its mandate to serve our community. We have been here - at this location - for about 50 years. Our church has been, and continues, to be, passionate about this city. It's in our name! Just 'as you each aspire to be.of service to this community as you serve on this council, our church exists to carry out a similar role in our community. So, to that end, for nearly five decades,(since before Tigard became a city), we have sought to be a benefit to this city. If you'll think about it, our church and the other Tigard churches exist with a unique mission: Not to take or get...but- to give to this city and its people. • We have always helped the homeless, hungry or hurting. We respond to need whenever/wherever we see it. We give financially to ease the strain and struggle of our citizens through food, rent and utility assistance. (By the way - most of the time the recipients of such humanitarian aid are not in our congregation ...but are connected by living in our community!) • We employ 4full-time pastors to equip and guide the children, youth and young adults of this community. • We patronize businesses in Tigard as our nearly 500 regular attendees shop at stores, eat at restaurants . and conduct other business in Tigard. 'So -our hope in this appeal is to plead with you to see. the value we add to this community., We want to continue and increase our favorable role in this community; but we feel the closure of our Gaarde Street entrance would greatly obstruct our positive' presence in our city. You see, Mayor Dirksen and City Council members, we are growing.,It's why we're here! And part of our growth plan is aimed at reducing any adverse traffic'-impact on our neighbors who live on or near 110th St.; by building adequate parking. Our desire to ease the street traffic impact on our neighbors off 110th is sure to fail if our Gaarde St. access is' eliminated. Therefore, it is our strong belief that our Expansion Project, which includes retaining - yet relocating-the Gaarde St. driveway further from 110th, is by all means reasonable and appropriate. Finally, for the many years of serving the people of our-city, the people of First Baptist Church of Tigard have responded favorably to numerous requests.by the city as you have sought to manage growth in our'city. We've, granted easements and bike path right-of-ways that had implications to our property. We've done so in good faith as a member of this community. We are asking that you demonstrate such willingness to assist us with granting this variance so, we can continue to serve the people of this city without undue 'or unreasonable restraints. I'm honored to have visited with you tonight. Out of respect for your busy lives I'm presenting signatures of over '300 members/regular attendees and neighbors in lieu of them speaking at this hearing: Thank you again. Address to. Tigard City Council Tuesday, July 26, 2005 RE: Gaarde St. Driveway Appeal Good evening. My name is Steve McCracken. I live at 16412 SW Luke Ln., here in Tigard. I have served as Senior Pastor of Tigard First Baptist Church for 12 years. I plan to stay at that post until I'm old! Thank you Mayor Dirksen (dirk-sen)' and council members for this opportunity to participate in a decision you will make that has great implications for our church and its mandate to serve our community. We have been here;- at this location - for about 50 years. Our church has been, and. continues to be, passionate about this city. It's in our name! Just as you each aspire to be of service to this community as you serve on this council, our church exists to carry out a similar role in our community. So, to that end, for nearly five decades (since before Tigard became a city), we have sought to be a benefit to' this city' If you'll think about it, our church and the other Tigard churches exist with a unique mission: Not to take or'get...but to give to this city and its people. • We have always helped the homeless, hungry or hurting. We respond to need whenever/wherever we see it. We give financially to ease the strain and struggle of our citizens through food, rent and utility assistance. (By the way - most of the time the recipients of such humanitarian aid are not in our congregation ...but are connected by living in our community!) We employ 4 full-time pastors to equip and guide the children, youth and young adults of this community. _ • We*patronize businesses in Tigard as our nearly 500 regular attendees shop at stores, eat at restaurants and conduct other business in Tigard. So our hope in this appeal is to plead with you to see the value we add to this community. We want to continue and increase our favorable role in this community, but we feel the closure of our Gaarde Street entrance would greatly obstruct our positive presence in our city. You see, Mayor Dirksen and City Council members, we are growing. It's why we're here! And part of our growth plan is aimed at reducing any adverse traffic impact on our neighbors who live on or near 110th St., by building adequate parking. Our desire to ease the street traffic impact on our neighbors off 110th is sure to fail if our Gaarde St. access is eliminated. Therefore, it is our strong belief that our Expansion Project, which includes retaining -yet relocating the Gaarde St. driveway further from 1 10th, is by all means reasonable and appropriate. Finally, for the many years of serving the people of our city, the people of First Baptist Church of Tigard have responded favorably to numerous requests by the city as you have sought to manage growth in our city. We've granted easements and bike path right-of-ways. that had implications to our property. We've done so in good faith as a member of this community. We are asking that you demonstrate such willingness to assist us with granting this variance so we can continue to serve the people of this city without undue or unreasonable restraints. I'm honored to have visited with you tonight. Out of respect for your busy lives I'm presenting signatures of over 300 members/regular attendees and neighbors in lieu of them speaking at this hearing. Thank you again. Address to Tigard.City Council Tuesday, July 26, 2005 RE: Gaarde St. Driveway Appeal Good evening. My name is Steve,McCracken. I live at 16412. SW Luke Ln.,. here in.Tigard. I have served as Senior Pastor of Tigard First Baptist Church for 12 years. I plan to stay at that post until I'm old! Thank you Mayor Dirksen (dirk-sen) and, council, members for this opportunity to participate in a decision you will make that has great implications for our church and its mandate to serve our community. We have been here - at this location - for about 50 years. Our church has been, and continues to be, passionate about this city.. It's in our name! Just as you each aspire to be of service to this community as you serve on this council, our church exists to carry out a similar role in our community. So, to that end,* for nearly five decades (since before Tigard became a city), we have sought to be a benefit to- this city. If you'll think about it, our church and the other Tigard churches exist with a unique mission: Not to take or get...but to give to this city and its people. • We have, always helped the homeless, hungry or hurting. We respond to; need whenever/wherever we see it. We give financially to ease the strain and struggle of our citizens through food, rent and utility . assistance. (By the way - most of the time the recipients of such humanitarian aid are not in our congregation ...but are connected by living in our community!) • We employ.4 full-time pastors to equip and guide the children, youth and young adults of this community. • We patronize businesses in Tigard-as our nearly 500 regular attendees shop at stores, eat at. restaurants and conduct other business in Tigard. . So - our hope in this appeal is to plead with you to see the value we add to this community. We. want to continue and increase our favorable role in this community, but we feel the closure of our Gaarde Street entrance would greatly obstruct our positive presence in our city. You see, Mayor Dirksen and City.Council members, we are growing. It's why we're here! And part of our growth plan is aimed at reducing any adverse traffic impact on our neighbors who live on or near I I0`h St., by building adequate parking.. Our desire to ease the street traffic impact on our neighbors off 110`h is sure to fail if our Gaarde St. access is eliminated. Therefore, it is our strong belief that our Expansion Project, which includes retaining - yet relocating the Gaarde St. driveway further from 110th, is by all means reasonable and appropriate. Finally, for the many years of serving the people of our city, the;people of First Baptist Church of Tigard have responded favorably to numerous requests by the city as you have sought to manage growth in our city. We've granted easements and bike path right-of-ways that had implications to our property. We've done so in good faith as a member of this community. We are asking that you demonstrate such willingness to assist us with granting this variance so we can continue to serve the people of this city without undue or unreasonable' restraints. I'm honored to have visited with you tonight. Out'of respect for your busy lives I'm presenting signatures of over'300 members/regular attendees and.neighbors in lieu of them speaking at this hearing. Thank you again. Address to Tigard City Council Tuesday, July 26, 2005 RE: Gaarde St. Driveway Appeal Good evening. My name is Steve McCracken. I live at 16412 SW Luke Ln., here in Tigard. I have served as Senior. Pastor of Tigard First Baptist Church for 12 years.. I plan to stay at that post until I'm old! Thank you Mayor Dirksen (dirk-sen) and council members for this opportunity to participate in a decision you will make that has great implications for our church and its mandate to, serve our community. We have been here - at this location - for about 50 years. Our church has been, and continues to be, passionate about this city. It's in our name! Just as you each aspire to be of service to this community as you serve on this council, our church exists to carry out a similar role in our community. , .So, to that end, for nearly five.decades (since before Tigard became a city), we have sought to be a benefit to this city. If you'll think about it, our church and the'other Tigard churches exist with a unique mission: Not to take or get...but to give to this city and its people. • We have always helped the homeless, hungry or hurting. We respond to need whenever/wherever we see it. We give financially to ease the strain and struggle of our citizens through food, rent and utility assistance. (By the way - most of the time the recipients of such humanitarian aid are not in our congregation but are connected by living in our community!) • We employ 4 full-time pastors to equip and guide the children, youth and young adults of this community. : • We patronize businesses in Tigard as our nearly 500 regular attendees shop at stores, eat at restaurants and conduct other business in Tigard." So'- our hope in this' appeal is to plead with you to see the value we add to this community. We want to continue and increase our favorable role in this community, but we feel the closure of our Gaarde Street entrance would greatly obstruct our positive presence in our city. You see, Mayor Dirksen and City Council .members, we are growing. It's- why we're here! And part of our growth plan is aimed at reducing any adverse traffic impact on our neighbors-who live on or near 110`h St., by building adequate parking. Our desire to ease the street traffic impact on our neighbors off 110th is sure to fail if our Gaarde St. access is eliminated. Therefore, it is our strong belief that our Expansion Project, which includes retaining - yet relocating the Gaarde St. driveway further from 110th, is by all means reasonable and. appropriate. . Finally, for the many years of serving the people of our city; the people of First'Baptist Church of.Tigard have responded favorably to numerous requests by .the city as you have sought to manage growth in our city. We've granted easements and bike path right-of-ways that had implications to our property. We've done so in good faith as a member of this community. We are asking that you demonstrate such willingness to assist'us with granting this variance so we can continue to serve.the people of this city without.undue or unreasonable restraints. I'm honored to have visited with you tonight. Out of respect for your busy lives I'm presenting signatures of over 300•members/regular attendees and neighbors in lieu of them speaking at this hearing. Thank you again. Address to Tigard City Council Tuesday, July 26, 2005 RE: Gaarde St. Driveway Appeal Good evening. My name is Steve McCracken. I live at 16412 SW Luke Ln.,.here in Tigard. I have served as Senior Pastor of Tigard First Baptist Church.for 12 years. I plan to stay at that post until I'm old! Thank you Mayor Dirksen (dirk-sen) and council members for this opportunity to participate in a decision you will make that has great implications for our church and its mandate to serve our community. We have been here - at this location - for about 50 years. Our church has been, and continues to be, passionate about this city. It's in our name! Just as you each aspire to be of service to this community as you serve on this council, our church exists to carry out a similar role in our community. So, to that end, for nearly five'decades (since before Tigard became a city), we have sought to be a benefit to this city. If you'll think about it, our church and the other Tigard churches exist with a unique mission: Not to take or get...but to give to this city and its people. We have always helped the homeless, hungry, or hurting. We respond to need whenever/wherever we see it. We give financially to :ease the strain and struggle of our citizens through food, rent and utility assistance. (By the way - most of the time the recipients of such humanitarian aid are not in our congregation ...but are connected by living in our community!) • 'We employ 4 full-time pastors to equip and guide the children, youth and young adults of this community. • We patronize businesses -in Tigard as our nearly 500 regular attendees shop at stores, eat at restaurants and conduct other business in Tigard. So - our hope in this appeal is to plead-with you to see the value we add to this community. We want to continue and increase our favorable role in this community, but we feel the closure of our Gaarde Street entrance would greatly obstruct our positive presence in our city. You see, Mayor Dirksen and City Council members, we are growing. It's why we're here! And part of our growth plan is aimed at reducing any adverse traffic impact on our neighbors who live on or near 110`h St., by building adequate parking. Our desire.to ease the street traffic impact on our neighbors off 110`h is sure to fail if our Gaarde St. access is eliminated. Therefore, it is our strong belief that our Expansion Project, which includes retaining - yet relocating the Gaarde St. driveway further from 110th, is by all means reasonable and appropriate. Finally, for the many years of serving the people of our city, the people of First Baptist Church of Tigard have responded favorably to numerous requests by the city as you have•sought to. manage growth in our city. We've granted easements and bike path right-of-ways that had implications to our property. We've done so in good faith as a member of this community. We are asking that you demonstrate such willingness to assist us with granting this variance so we can continue to serve the people of this city without undue or unreasonable restraints. I'm honored to have visited with you tonight. Out of respect for your busy lives I'm presenting signatures of over 300 members/regular attendees and neighbors in lieu of them,speaking at this hearing. Thank you again. Address to Tigard City Council .Tuesday, July 26, 2005 RE: Gaarde St. Driveway Appeal Good evening. My name is Steve McCracken. I live at 16412 SW'Luke Ln., here in Tigard. I have served as Senior Pastor of Tigard First Baptist Church'for 12 years. I plan to stay at that post until I'm old! Thank you Mayor Dirksen (dirk-sen) and. council members for this opportunity to participate in.a decision you . will make that has great implications for our church and its mandate to serve our community. We have been here - at this location - for about 50 years. Our church has been, and continues to be, passionate about this city. It's in our name! Just as you each aspire to be of service to this community as you serve on this council, our church, exists to carry out a similar role in our community. So, to that end, for nearly five decades (since before Tigard became a city), we have sought to be a benefit to this city. If you'll think about it, our church and the other Tigard churches exist with a unique mission: Not to take or get...but to give to this city and its people. • We have always helped the homeless, hungry or hurting. We respond to need whenever/wherever we see it. We give financially to ease the strain and struggle of our citizens through food, rent and utility . assistance. (By the way - most of the time the recipients of such humanitarian aid are not in our congregation but are connected by living in our community!) • We employ 4 full-time pastors to equip and guide the children, youth and young adults of this community. • We patronize businesses in Tigard as our nearly 500 regular attendees shop at stores, eat at restaurants and conduct other business in Tigard. So _ our hope in this appeal is to plead with' you to see the value we add to this community. We want to continue and increase our favorable role in this community, but we feel the closure of our Gaarde Street . entrance would greatly obstruct our positive presence in our city. You see, Mayor Dirksen and City Council members, we are growing. It's why we're here! 'And part of our growth plan is aimed at reducing any adverse traffic impact on our neighbors who live on or near 1 l01h St:, by building adequate parking. Our desire to ease the street traffic impact on our neighbors off 110th is sure to fail if our Gaarde St. access is eliminated. Therefore,. it is our strong belief that our Expansion Project, which includes retaining -yet relocating the Gaarde St. driveway further from 110th, is by all means reasonable and appropriate. Finally, for the many years of serving the people of our city, the people of First Baptist Church of Tigard have responded favorably to numerous requests by the city as you have sought to manage growth in our city. We've granted: easements and bike path right-of-ways that had implications to our property. We've done so in good faith as a member of this community. We are asking that you demonstrate 'such willingness to assist us with granting this variance so we can continue to serve the people of this city without undue or unreasonable restraints. I'm. honored to have visited with you tonight. Out of respect for your busy lives I'm presenting signatures of over 300.members/regularattendees and neighbors in lieu of them speaking at this hearing. Thank you again. PETITION IN SUPPORT OF TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH'S S.W. GAARDE ST. ACCESS we the undersigned members /attendees of the Tigard First Baptist church support the access on S.W. Gaarde street proposed as part of the church's expansion project. The S.W. Gaarde Street access is safer to use than having all traffic leave the church's parking lots onto 110th Avenue --and--try to-enter traffic flow on-s.w-.--Gaarde at its dangerous inter.s'ection-with 110th- Avenue. v ~ P, -r.~ DUE 0273 A ~~5~~ PETITION IN SUPPORT OF TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH'S S.W. GAARDE ST. ACCESS we the undersigned members/attenders of the Tigard First Baptist church support the access on S.W. Gaarde street proposed as part of the church's expansion project. The S.W. Gaarde street access is safer to use than having all traffic leave the church's parking lots onto 110th Avenue and try to enter traffic flow on S.W. Gaarde at its dangerous intersection with 110th Avenue. SIGNATURE DATE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE G/ 7 AK-e-5 JR!. IJ -k-J 143S7 S.~✓~ QD-n 0< T1G /Gs1~~ 012 7722 ~ 13re ,re -1-deers ~ 2 s3 In/ C~e~.tod< ~ * ~ ~ ba~ ~ ~ ~2 r K"APP a3 3 5V3 LA)iLt-iAfQt7 v~ -o 2 ~al G/7 Z3S-&7 S' Q Pivleh rA fir. - S~.e,r oA ql lqc) -j, i (F F Kil L7 1/1 6k 1-,Ifo,~-d S c " 8 N' (W l l amp 100(06 &W l eQ G 7-~c a l~-~i n g 706 *T4oo6- N~LCSNCtc`~F ri.~ ~u2~o s-✓ t,+00 c-r- ,A-+14; ZN 7706 h /~~h2 / '.z~'z 4 f~iC~h~ /lssrn•~/Er ,YkY s~ 33 e ;722/ a. aloe d G v m) ((Oy 15070 5W C.1io-ro(d Vt. I d 0K 6) 7g;-41 ° 0sl l~n rS 91 dz~ s~ v,ti~ c 7// %f. ox- Cr22 l menan r-o rd i ce: 13y1.1 50 UyJYA, Lm ~~aa3 (0 pAKW .Swq-nh4w ~(5~5 S1V R u►~~ t-v E ~ q 42 2 / rve ~rl~ Cf~i Z Su>. v/le L~J. ZZ z- 9 Ker►n Z1715 ,S'C.J Cv1u 6,a~ rv~e Tu0.f{2[ ~n k.al 0- 706 i3 6 1q Sc tf T~Y-o6 sw GGlk,~,,, i ~Z23 PETITION IN SUPPORT OF TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH'S S.W. GAARDE"ST:>ACCESS .we the undersigned members/attendees of the Tigard First Baptist church support the access.on S.W. Gaarde street proposed as part of the church's expansion project. The S.W. Gaarde.street access is safer to use than having all traffic leave the Church's parking lots onto 110th Avenue and try to enter traffic flow on S.W. Gaarde at its dangerous intersection-with 110th Avenue. SIGNATURE' DATE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY• ZIP CODE c~ `f r Wk b c3K, cg~ v Ya fly-S Ar/ S~v X171 'ere o(l6"lz"o~ K 1~1 Nfollcn up~(af 9qS 5W G>ecn Gv r+ (Q 7706 ~_1Z A00bL L • he Z 14°l~0 ~w tOb►~^ Aye Twayd -g- a'1 ZzA- wNR DQ e- 1' d 31 S G✓ ll2~L~1 rd _ X72- rriar urs C,-Jb,q sw 9-2 yliq 6~2~as a ~o. - ~ 311 ~ av~~A ~ PCB' ZI 9 rOr v eh S S~~S' S :3 s as Gzr f~/' ovae K X706 ZZ PETITION IN SUPPORT OF TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH'S S.W..GAARDE ST. ACCESS We the undersigned members/attendees of "the Tigard First Baptist church support the access on- S.W. Gaarde street proposed as part of the church's expansion project. The S.W. Gaarde Street access is safer to use than having all traffic leave the church's parking lots onto 110th Avenue- -and try to enter traffic flow on S.W. Gaarde at its.dangerous intersection with 110th .Avenue. IGNATURE DATE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE s is - I ro -29 "ss~ C&I Y; le a s v' 97D ,01? AD ~i o ►~a~cJl ~rso Scs EdOu ,f__ cr 72 3 4L -a ZJQ1 1 0-1 "n 0- oo ~a9 9U S S . 6 ; ;fin a IlG ~o 6 rd~~ <73 Le-Ka_ - q~3 3 3 ev-Z AW r( 27 a Gn e,4 ~i'0 v edZVO 6 7 44 l as , _J 7-1 7 C7 S~ &ake- ODD 291 wl Q as cc5 kady 4vevs441 S L s~~ Y 2 u~ to (ua, J_ loll 5 S41 ~l Z a .¢cJ 5 ?a 5;,a3 % ~ /G CAA ~L ~ ,e 1,97 G-/2 - Ild to,_5 _5 f I 4-1010&1~~AV C12--PAof-(' _s qz--2; q / y S s S~Fnz~flri a R ~~a a r ~O'~? c A~OS~x \J~~oZ. v~ho DC Q Z •12-6 t 310 sv-J >0+eT1)An_0 G-72j_ i~ Zz PETITION IN SUPPORT OF TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH'S S.W. GAARDE ST..ACCESS we the undersigned members/attendees of the Tigard First Baptist church support the access on S.W. Gaarde street proposed as part of the church's expansion project. The S.W. Gaarde Street access is safer to use than having all traffic leave the church's parking-lots onto 110th Avenue and try to enter traffic flow on S.W. Gaarde at its dangerous intersection with 110th Avenue. -SIGNATURE DATE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE ` '1 i rnGLf'1 co, 12 IDan ► eilt,m m dsb( i 5 eiztw Sw H&M sh LrC. Tew r. T d DP-- 11-7X* wenc ha-0 J~ 75 SGLJ Fvnnvr , a~ L 7223 ~~ol l~tt() G l?D5~ ~kclat l~U(~(~`~ ~4~57 S l✓ ~'r~o) S✓y yr ~j/Q T2~ I't" 2 w$ #1'1 L, 0.297 CLA, z- r 75gard_ (le, C? 1 75 St.~ OR Tai kA L (A m- yy Szu tee. Cf- aA,-04 ~?Cxq- -2 ° RLsC_LL_6op v F►oqM0451i sw K&11J- s1-1k_6r TI&W OR 972.2q is ~i3" uL P& `pal 5 4J z 6AQ 97a a ~ 2 os r; ~1 • 1-fL~-s erg ~l l ~s sub ez~geLoauA 7`. ~ 2 Z3 p I C~'I~ lam`-~(~ CJ~ O .f w r h ~c s C / 971' r ~-ltS 6 ~'k~ ros 6 o ScI ere,,., BQ 9>/ ~ -/1' cU ~ETS //(.9!7 1N9,1VZ4 f f T! th2~ 9 721 -1 L - So1~r , ~C--t C- S- J~ A/N -nr dfi 7-7 0 62 l L2 2 t ~-os - 6 522 Goy. Cf- z 7ZL 3 ~,,h « s C fw 0 G _~7 t I - is Gs-~NN~~ f~u►l~K ~y~i5 4) ~~sEy g~~J Shele ,&e Q7t3 22