Loading...
City Council Packet - 03/15/2005 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING March 15, 2005 COUNCIL MEETING WILL NOT BE TELEVISED I:\OISXDOnna'slccPktZ Agenda Item No. Lk) For Agenda of 4 , a (.o •0 5 COUNCIL MINUTES TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 15, 2005 1. WORKSHOP MEETING 1.1 Mayor Dirksen called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. 1.2 Present: Mayor Dirksen; Councilors Harding, Sherwood, Wilson, and Woodruff 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports: None 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. JOINT MEETING WITH LIBRARY BOARD Library Board Members Present: Marvin Diamond Sue Kasson Brian Kelly Ruthanne Lidman - Alternate Jane Smith Suzan Turley, Chair Library Director Barnes introduced this agenda item. She noted that this is the City Council's annual meeting with the Library Board. Library Director Barnes introduced Library Board Chair Suzan Turley. Ms. Turley then introduced the other Library Board members who were present. Ms. Turley thanked the City Council for its support of the new library. She noted that people are thrilled with the new space. The library has three and one-half times more space than the old library. Board member Diamond reviewed statistics regarding the new library. Since opening, the library has experienced a 31 percent increase in visitors - more than 200,000 visitors have accessed the library since its opening. Reference desk transactions are up more than 70 percent and library checkouts are up 14 percent. The number of print and audio visual items processed is up over 20 percent - more than 260,000 items have been processed. Mr. Diamond noted appreciation for the City Council's support of the library. Library Board member Kelly noted that the Library offers lifelong learning opportunities and bedrock services for the community. Library programs and services are offered to all ages. Mr. Kelly reviewed some of the programs available. COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 15, 2005 page l 0 Board member Kasson reviewed that the library has been open from 1-5 p.m. during the last two Sundays. Ms. Kasson referred to a recent survey wherein 71 percent of those participating in the survey requested that Sunday hours be added to the library. On March 6 and 13, approximately 905 people came to the library. Board member Smith reviewed the results of the recent public survey for the library. This information obtained from the community is important so that the Library Board knows how the community feels about the services being provided. 2,830 surveys were completed this year and were available both in English and Spanish. Last year, 1,265 surveys were completed. Of those who responded, 49 percent used the library four or more times per month. Patrons were asked if they found the materials they were looking for when the came to the library: 31 percent said "always," 61 percent said "sometimes," and only .75 percent answered "never." Of those survey respondents who used the reference desk, 97.5 percent rated the service received as excellent or good. 97.5 percent of the respondents who use the check-out desk rated the service as excellent or good. Mayor Dirksen noted the accessibility of the reference desk, which is much better than the old library. Library Board Chair Turley, again, noted her appreciation of the City Council and the City staff. There was some discussion on the peripheral library amenities including the coffee bar and the community room. From the survey comments, people were pleased with the coffee bar. Library Director Barnes noted the community room is available for the public's use; its use is scheduled through city offices. This room has been used for regional training by government agencies as well as by private groups for functions. In response to a question from Councilor Woodruff about the rental income from the library as a potential source for funding library services on Sundays, Interim City Manager Prosser noted that the rate established for the community room was only enough to recover costs for utilities and janitorial services. The library board is working on a Strategic Plan. This information will be presented to the City Council at a later date. 3. JOINT MEETING WITH SKATE PARK TASK FORCE Skate Park Task Force members present for this agenda item: Rich Carlson and Pat Biggs. Staff members present for this agenda item included Public Works Director Koellermeier and Parks Manager Plaza. Public Works Director Koellermeier introduced this agenda item. COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 15, 2005 page 2 Task Force member Rich Carlson reported to the Council on the work to get ready for fundraising. At a recent meeting, there were a number of volunteers who agreed to contact about 80 businesses to raise money for the skate park. A packet of information on the fundraising effort was distributed the City Council. The theme is "Get on Board!" for the Jim Griffith Memorial Skate Park. Fundraising strategies were briefly reviewed with the City Council. Mr. Carlson noted that Mayor Dirksen had signed a letter that would be sent to businesses. There is a plan to publicize the names of those who make a contribution to the skate park. Ms. Biggs noted that, in the packet distributed to the City Council, there is a contribution pledge form. The information contained in the packet was reviewed with the City Council. Councilor Sherwood said it was important to remember to ask those with whom you come in contact about whether they would be willing to make a contribution to the skate park. Mr. Carlson noted that fundraising will continue through May 2005. Information about the Skate Park will be included in the next issue of Cityscape. The skate park article will feature some information about the park as well as asking people to "Get on Board!" Laura Tietz has donated her time for the graphic design work. The Board members discussed with the City Council the fundraising activities to date and solicited ideas from the Council about how volunteers could make contacts. Mr. Carlson asked for help from City Council members in raising funds. Ms. Biggs is coordinating the list of people contacted. Public Works Director Koellermeier noted that an update on the grant application for skate park funds will be coming to the City Council in April. City Council must give staff the authority to apply for the grant is needed. The grant funds come from state lottery dollars. The grant, if received, would be used to match the pledge of $150,000 by the City. Public Works Director Koellermeier advised that General Contractor Doug McDowell will help the City of Tigard work on this project. Mr. McDowell will coordinate the commercial/corporate sponsorships and donations of construction materials. Public Works Director Koellermeier referred to the concept plan. A company by the name of "Dream Land" will create the set of plans which will make it possible to request and obtain permits. The plans will also show a timeline for construction. COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 15, 2005 page 3 Parks Manager Plaza reviewed the proposed schedule, which would be to apply for the State grant in April. By June, it will be known whether or not the City was successful in receiving the grant. Money from the grant would be available in the fall of 2005 and it is anticipated the skate park would be open by June 2006. In response to a question from Councilor Wilson, Public Works Director Koellermeier noted the need to work with the contractor to determine what materials can be provided by donation and those materials that the contractor would need to provide. A system needs to be devised to assure that items donated are available when needed. Mr. Carlson noted that Mark Scott would also be helping with the coordination of donations. Councilor Wilson said he could also help with a list of contacts for construction materials. City employee, Marco Cabanillas, has offered to volunteer to work on the skate park. 4. JOINT MEETING WITH DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE/DOWNTOWN PLAN UPDATE Downtown Task Force Members Present: Janice Arave, Carolyn Barkley, Martha Bishop, Marland Henderson, and Mike Marr Staff present for this item: Community Development Director Hendryx, Planning Manager Shields, Associate Planner St. Amand. Community Development Director Hendryx introduced this agenda item and distributed to the City Council a Downtown logo button. Highlights of the presentation made by Community Development Director Hendryx are contained on a PowerPoint handout; the presentation is on file in the City Recorder's office. Council received handouts during the presentation and discussion that followed. Handouts included: a brochure entitled, Your Tigard, Your Downtown; a packet of materials entitled, Community Dialog Packet. In addition, a Refined Design Alternative map was reviewed with the City Council. Staff, when reviewing the Refined Design Alternative map, noted the reality of the plan will depend on whether the market will respond to the plan. There are many things the City can do to jumpstart the plan in the implementation stages. The downtown area consists of 140 properties, with 107 property owners. Most of the property owners have been in the City for a long time. Ten percent of the property owners are out-of-state; while 88 percent are from the Metro area or are located within the state. Two-thirds of the people in the downtown area have not been involved in the planning for the downtown area. Communication tools used have included newspaper notices, fliers, and focus meetings. There is some frustration COUNCIL MINUTES -MARCH 15, 2005 page 4 that there has not been more involvement. The Task Force will continue to outreach to the downtown property owners. A meeting was held last week regarding a potential extension of Ash Street. The neighbors that attended this meeting were opposed to the extension. This connection is shown in the Transportation System Plan. The Downtown Plan is not dependent upon the Ash Street extension; however, developers have advised that access and visibility to the downtown are highly important. Decisions will be needed on how the Plan will be implemented. Measure 37 complicates and raises additional issues. Funding of the Downtown Plan would include formation of an urban renewal district. However, it was noted that the Downtown Plan is distinct from an Urban Renewal Plan. The Downtown Plan is a land use document. Task Force Chair Marr noted that there are approximately 22 members of the Downtown Task Force who -represent a wide variety of perspectives. Mr. Marr advised that Tigard. is one of the last communities to set a Downtown Plan in place and said that he believes the Tigard community is suffering because of this. He advised that people do not feel there is community center and he would like to see this corrected. Mr. Marr said the Downtown could have a unique identity where people could spend their time and dollars. He noted the additional employment opportunities that could be made available. He acknowledged there would be issues to work through including the Ash Avenue extension and the railroad crossings. The plan calls for rebuilding most of the Downtown except for Main Street and City Hall; however, the Task Force wanted to make sure that no property or business owner would be on the "losing end of the stick." Relocation of businesses would not be the first choice - the Task Force members want to minimize impacts on business and property owners. Mr. Marr noted that there are a lot of issues that are yet to be decided upon - but there's a need to "start from somewhere." He said that the Task Force felt if would be reasonable to first layout a drawing of what "might be" and then refine the plan. Plan implementation will need to be market driven and developers will need to be certain of the Plan's viability before they will invest. Recently several large developers were contact (including Commercial Realty Advisors, PacTrust, OPUS Northwest, Gramor Development NW, Specht Development, GSL Properties, and Center Oak Properties). Their comments included suggestions about the need for visibility of the. downtown area. The developers said this is an ambitious plan overall, which balances diversity. Mayor Dirksen referred to the Washington County work on an urban renewal plan for the Highway 217 corridor. In the County's study, the mixed uses for residential and commercial for the downtown area were supported. COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 15, 2005 page 5 Planning Manager Shields noted there is excitement about the Downtown Plan - for what's uniquely Tigard and the basic concept of the "green heart of Tigard." There is concern about the need for more parking and the constraints on access from Hall Boulevard and 99W. It is anticipated that the Main Street area will remain much as it is now. New development will complement the Main Street development. Councilor Woodruff noted that the Downtown Plan drawing shows the clearest vision that he has seen so far with regard to concepts for the downtown. He referred to the Vision Task Force recommendation that the downtown become the gathering place for community activities such as the Saturday Market. He noted support for use of the Fanno Creek area for family friendly events. Community Development Director Hendryx referred to a community dialog packet, which gives information on projects that the community and consultants say are key. There was some discussion of the "branding Tigard" efforts for both the downtown and the City of Tigard (which is being pursued as part of a City Council goal). Councilor Wilson noted he attended a December meeting regarding the downtown. He said the drawing appears to have changed. since then. He commented that it looked as if the Task Force backed off on density. Community Development Director Hendryx responded that the current map is a more site- specific plan. There is a need to develop more parking. Planning Manager Shields noted that the number of units that will be available in the downtown is not yet known - a variety of housing options could be pursued. Councilor Wilson commented that, as the downtown area redevelops, he hoped that it would be able to support a mix of uses. Councilor Wilson noted in December that it seemed as though the Ash Street connection had some interesting elements and was depicted as a "spine." Planning Manager Shields noted that if the Downtown Plan does not rely on the Ash Street extension, then the "spine" would move to Pacific Highway. Mr. Marr said that he did not think that the Task Force should rely on the Ash Street extension so much that the Plan would fall apart if there is a great deal of opposition to the extension. He noted the need to work with the neighborhood for a crossing of Fanno Creek and to provide some traffic calming. Another hurdle will be to cross the railroad tracks - to give the downtown some needed traffic circulation. It was suggested that work continue with the Railroad to look at the possibility of consolidating crossings in other areas. Mayor. Dirksen said an over crossing of the tracks was also discussed. Mr. Marr said that a viaduct to address the railroad situation would ruin the ambiance of the downtown. Mayor Dirksen advised that it would be worth considering - to review illustrations of what it would look like if put into place. COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 15, 2005 page 6 Mayor Dirksen said there is much speculation about the Walnut Street extension and a scientific study is needed so that it can be determined exactly what the impact will be. Councilor Harding noted the Greenburg intersection also needs to be addressed. Councilor Wilson referred to the Transportation System Plan and acknowledged the opposition that the Ash Street connection would generate. He also agreed that the downtown area needs traffic circulation improvements. Task Force member Barkley distributed a March 9, 2005, letter to the City Council and Downtown Task from Daniel and Kathy Strauss regarding their questions and concerns associated with the downtown improvement plan. She reported that Mr. and Mrs. Strauss have not received an answer to this letter. Task Force member Henderson noted that the downtown effort will need additional city staffing and requested that this be reviewed during the City's budget process. Mr. Marr encouraged the City Council to look at this as an opportunity to pull the community together. He said there will be a need to compromise. The City will need to have a significant majority of support (85 percent) from the citizens for the plan to become a reality. It is critical to work with people to find ways to give them something they would want. The Ash Avenue neighborhood is critical and for plans to be in place to protect property values. There was brief discussion on Measure 37 implications. The goal would be to make improvements that would increase property values. Community Development Director Hendryx noted the Plan was not far enough along to make a determination about impacts relating to provisions of Measure 37. Planning Manager Shields said Measure 37 issues would have to be addressed. Mr. Marr said if the Council decided to go out for a vote on urban renewal, there would be a need to respond to opposition on this concept. Councilor Sherwood said the urban renewal effort would need to include some funding for public relations. Mr. Marr remarked that how urban renewal works would need to be explained in plain language so people could understand tax increment financing. He suggested that this information be presented by other citizens. Councilor Sherwood said she agreed with Mr. Marr and indicated that this had been also discussed by the Council. Councilor Woodruff said that the challenge would be to work with people directly affected by the Downtown Plan. He said he thought the plan looks "great" for those people who are not directly affected. Mayor Dirksen said there will be some opposition as there are some people who will not want to see any changes. COUNCIL MINUTES- MARCH 15, 2005 page 7 In response to a question from Councilor Harding, Mr. Marr advised that there are not a lot of alternatives for traffic circulation in the downtown area. There was additional discussion on the need to work with the railroad to determine if some of the railroad crossings could be eliminated. The Downtown Task Force will visit again with the City Council in June. Mr. Marr agreed with Councilor Wilson that there needs to be a grassroots campaign for the Downtown Plan to be successful. Councilor Harding suggested that information and a public survey be made available at the Library. She also suggested that the map (drawing) of the proposed Downtown Plan be made available for public viewing at the Library. Mr. Marr said he believes that the majority of the community would support the Downtown Plan; however, there is a need to address the concerns of the minority. Council meeting recessed: 8:38 p.m Meeting. reconvened: 8:44 p.m. 5. PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS FOR FY 2005- 06 City Engineer Duenas presented a staff report; the presentation outline reviewed with the Council is on file in the City Recorder's office. With regard to the $50,000 overlay for Burnham Street, City Engineer Duenas said that after receiving input from Councilors Sherwood and Harding, he is recommending that improvements be delayed until the Downtown Plan is finalized. City Engineer Duenas talked about how concerns could be alleviated with the Walnut Street extension study and to look at the Ash Street corridor. He recommended holding off on this item until the Downtown Plan is completed. There was discussion of the railroad switching area located in the City of Tigard. Mayor Dirksen suggested this might be a good time to talk with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) about this area being used for switching of cars - why can downtown Tigard be used as a switching yard? Councilor Wilson suggested that talks be held with Railroad to advocate finding another alternative. City Engineer Duenas said that one mile of track is needed for this switching operation, which is presently being done between Bonita Road and Tiedeman Street in Tigard. Councilor Harding noted she had received calls about the Walnut Street improvements (a County project). Residents have noted concerns about the type of street lighting to be used for this project. City Engineer Duenas said there are COUNCIL MINUTES -MARCH 15, 2005 page 8 lighting requirements. Councilor Harding reported that the neighbors wanted the lighting to look less industrial. City Engineer Duenas said he would look into this with the County. Councilor Woodruff noted the Skate Park amount as shown on the CIP list should indicate that this total amount is not all City dollars. Councilor Woodruff said he appreciated being supplied with the comments from the public. He was surprised,that more people did not comment. Councilor Wilson asked about fee-in-lieu of undergrounding money (for utility lines). City Engineer Duenas noted that the fees collected have been used for projects and this money could be used in conjunction with Transportation Growth Management (TGM) money. Councilor Wilson pointed out there are a lot of overhead power lines and he would like to see more of these removed. In response to a question about the money shown in the Capital Improvement Project list for the water building, Interim City Manager Prosser noted that this money would be used for the HVAC system, window seals, and reconfiguration of office space. This would be paid for by water funds. Councilor Sherwood noted the need to coordinate with the Senior Center with regard to the Community Development Block Grant for remodeling. 6. CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF A PROPOSED RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT COLLABORATION WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY JURISDICTIONS REGARDING PROPOSED CHANGES TO GOAL 14, URBANIZATION AND THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Community Development Director Hendryx reviewed the information contained the City Council meeting packet including a proposed resolution. Also included in the packet was a resolution adopted (October 25, 2004) by the City of Tualatin. Community Development Director Hendryx referred to the City Council 2005 goal to seek changes with Metro. He noted that the City Council wanted to see some ability to free up the Comprehensive Planning process so the City could respond to citizens' concerns and to have more flexibility with density requirements. Interim City Manager Prosser referred to the draft resolution. At a previous City Council meeting there was a proposal that to split the resolution into two separate resolutions. One resolution could address the City of Tualatin's issues and the other could outline the City of Tigard's issues. Interim City Manager Prosser asked if the City Council was interested in pursuing two separate resolutions. There will be a meeting with the City of Tualatin Council on April 4 and this might provide an COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 15, 2005 page 9 opportunity for the City of Tigard City Council to discuss with Tualatin their issues with Metro. Councilor Wilson said he would rather talk about the City of Tigard's issues as he was not sure he totally understood Tualatin's issues. Interim City Manager Prosser reviewed the history of how Metro came into existence as it is now structured including the 1992 Charter ballot measure approved by voters. Councilor Wilson commented that the 1992 Charter measure was billed as a "Home Rule" piece of legislation, but it also established a regional framework which gave power to Metro to "trump" local planning. He said that he felt that Metro ignores the impacts to local communities. Councilor Wilson agreed there are issues that should be addressed on a regional basis but, as much as possible, planning should be a local responsibility to respond, to neighborhood concerns. Councilor Wilson said that the Metro Policy Advisory (MPAC) recommendations are ignored by Metro. He said he did not believe the issues with regard to setting urban growth boundaries were seriously debated. Councilor Wilson suggested a review of Metro could range from elevating the importance of MPAC all the way to whether or not Metro serves any purpose. He said it seems that cities are constantly on the defensive while local planners spend their time reacting to Metro's initiatives. Citizens have no easy way to send feedback to Metro when Metro issues regulations affecting them. Citizens complain to local government, and Councilor Wilson questioned whether Metro had any idea of the level of the public's dissatisfaction. Councilor Wilson summarized that the above issues are examples of what needs to be dealt with; although, at this point, he is not sure to what extent he would support changes to Metro. Councilor Woodruff said he basically agreed with Councilor Wilson, but asked what could the City realistically do? Discussion followed on options including proposing a ballot measure to address concerns about Metro (initiative process). There was a comment that the City of Tigard could not do this alone; however, there may now be an opportunity to join other jurisdictions on Metro issues. MPAC would be a good venue for these types of discussions. City of Tualatin Mayor Ogden has invited others to participate in a regional discussion. Councilor Wilson reiterated that the stature of MPAC should be raised. Mayor Dirksen advised that he recently met with Lake Oswego Councilor Jack Huffman and discussed the possibility of an MPAC-sponsored symposium to review Metro issues. COUNCIL MINUTES -MARCH 15, 2005 page 10 Council consensus was for Mayor Dirksen to pursue the idea of a symposium. Suggestions for invitees to the symposium included the Metro Council, regional mayors, City Council members, and business leaders. Another option would be to approach the State legislature with proposed changes . to Metro. Councilor Wilson said he could support the proposed resolution as a starting point for the City of Tigard. Interim City Manager Prosser suggested that a section be added to the resolution to direct staff to contact other cities to identify issues and develop a common strategy. Consensus of the Council was that Section 1 of the resolution be fleshed out. There was discussion on whether or not to pursue a resolution or focus on working with MPAC or businesses. Community Development Director Hendryx and Planning Manager Shields noted that the City of Tigard is hoping for assistance from Metro with the downtown area. The urbanization, section of the proposed resolution was reviewed. Mayor Dirksen referred to problems with urban growth boundaries whereby properties should have been required to be tied to an urban area before development could occur. Staff will redraft Sections 1 and 2 of the resolution. Section 2 will need to indicate the City's need for more authority with regard to local comprehensive planning and limit Metro's authority on local land use controls. A revised draft resolution will be brought back to the City Council at a later date for its consideration. 7. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS: None 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS: None > ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS: City Hall Day at the Capitol - April 13 -The day will include meetings with legislative leaders, briefings on issues and opportunities to meet with your legislators and network with other city officials. Contact Mary Macpherson (503) 588-6550 or mmacpherson(a-orcities.org. Staff needs input from City Council to prepare a list of Tigard issues. Interim City Manager Prosser advised the Assistant to the City Manager Newton is working on a list of issues. There are three bills regarding limiting government authority on imposing staffing limits. Councilor Wilson noted the need to get staffing costs under control as the current trends are not sustainable. Interim City Manager Prosser will review this matter again with Council on April 12 so the City Council can give staff its final word on matters of concern. COUNCIL MINUTES -MARCH 15, 2005 page 11 • Fifth Tuesday Meeting Notice: The notice was revised to delete the requirement for meeting participants to submit a written statement. • Council Calendar: o March 29: 5th Tuesday Council Meeting - 7 p.m. -'Water Auditorium - check to see if library com. room is available o April 4: Special Meeting - Library Community Room 6-7 p.m. - Goal update (staff) 7 p.m. Joint Meeting with Tigard-Tualatin School Board and Tualatin City Council o April 12: Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Town Hall o April 19: Council Workshop Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Town Hall o April 25: Budget Committee Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Library Community Room o April 26: Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Town Hall o May 6: Shining Stars Banquet 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Not held. 10. ADJOURNMENT: 10:16 p.m. Catherine Wheatley, City Reco er Attest: May , Ci y of Tigard Date: Ll • ~0• 0 5 1Aadmlcathytccet20051050315 finhl.doc COUNCILMINUTES - MARCH 15, 2005 page 12 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 15, 2005 6:30 p.m. CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503- 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 15, 2005 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 15, 2005 6:30 PM 1. WORKSHOP MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council K Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications 81 Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 6:35 PM 2. JOINT MEETING WITH LIBRARY BOARD • Staff Introduction: Library Staff 7:05 PM 3. JOINT MEETING WITH SKATE PARK TASK FORCE ■ Staff Introduction: Public Works Staff 7:35 PM 4. JOINT MEETING WITH DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE/DOWNTOWN PLAN UPDATE ■ Staff Introduction: Community Development Staff 8:05 PM 5. PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS FOR FY 2005-06 ■ Staff Report: Engineering Staff 8:25 PM 6. CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF A PROPOSED RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT COLLABORATION WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY JURISDICTIONS REGARDING PROPOSED CHANGES TO GOAL 14, URBANIZATION AND THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY ADMINISTRATIVE RULES ■ Staff Introduction: Community Development Staff 9:25 PM 7. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS COUNCIL AGENDA -MARCH 15, 2005 page 2 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS > ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS: • City Hall Day at the Capitol - April 13 - Message from League of Oregon Cities says, "This is an opportunity for you to ensure that the voice of your community is heard in Salem. The day will include meetings with legislative leaders, briefings on issues and opportunities to meet with your legislators and network with other city officials. Watch for more information from the League. Contact Mary Macpherson (503) 588-6550 or mmacpherson@orcities.org. Staff needs input from City Council to prepare a list of Tigard issues. • Fifth Tuesday Meeting Notice: Change the notice to delete the requirement for a written statement? (See attached copy of the Notice.) • Council Calendar: • March 29: 51 Tuesday Council Meeting - 7 p.m. - Water Auditorium • April 4: Special Meeting - Library Community Room 6-7 p.m. - Goal update (staff) 7 p.m. Joint Meeting with Tigard-Tualatin School Board and Tualatin City Council • April 12: Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Town Hall • April 19: Council Workshop Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Town Hall • April 25: Budget Committee Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Library Community Room • April 26: Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. - Town Hall 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 10:00 PM 10. ADJOURNMENT Eleam\c thy\cca12005W50315.doc COUNCIL AGENDA -MARCH 15, 2005 page 3 kN C 'I' Y1 CITY OF TIGARD 5"' TUESDAY MEETING WITH THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MARCH 29,2005; 7-9 PM TIGARD WATER BUILDING AUDITORIUM 8777 SW BURNHAM STREET, TIGARD, OREGON Please forward to: Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) Newsroom, The Oregonian (Fax No. 503-968-6061) Editor, The Regal Courier (Fax No. 503-968-7397) Members of the Tigard City Council will be available on the Sth Tuesday of March, March 29, 2005, to hear and discuss citizen input in an informal setting. The purpose of this 5th Tuesday meeting is to have an interchange of ideas pertinent to the City and the issues which affect the City. Therefore, issues will be limited to City issues, with the City Council members present making the determination which issues meet this standard. Council has invited State Senator Ginny Burdick and State Representative Larry Galizio to attend the March 29, 2005, 5th Tuesday meeting. The meetings will be facilitated by a trained facilitator, with Council encouraging all those citizens in attendance to provide input. No time limits have been created; rather, the Council will set limits for an evening based on the number of citizens who attend. The meetings will be devoted to the topics suggested at the meeting. The facilitator's role will be to insure civility and the opportunity for all to participate in an equal manner. The meetings will be noted as public meetings, and topical minutes will be kept. A quorum of Council will not be needed to conduct the meeting; in fact, lack of a quorum is likely. Those citizens who attend will be asked to sign in ,,a -to iscuss 'a e mee that evening. Council may determine that discussion of a topic requires additional resources; namely staff, documents, or other materials to help focus a discussion. In such a case, Council may choose to accept the issue for further discussion or correspondence at a later time. Fifth Tuesday meetings will conclude promptly at 9 PM, or earlier if the discussions conclude earlier than 9 PM. Council encourages citizens to attend the fifth Tuesday meetings and take advantage of the opportunity to meet the Council members and interact in an informal setting on City issues. For further information, please contact City Recorder Cathy Wheatley by calling 503-639-4171, Ext 2410. t~ City Recorder Post: Tigard City Hall Tigard Permit Center Tigard Public Library 3 lAndmlcathytcounclllmeeling noliceslcc meeting notlcesVllth luesday public notice.doc I AGENDA ITEM # °Z FOR AGENDA OF March 15, 2004 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Joint Meeting with the Library Board PREPARED BY: Margaret Barnes DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL This is the regularly scheduled, annual joint meeting between City Council and the Library Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION N/A INFORMATION SUMMARY Annual meeting with the Library Board to provide information to the City Council. The Library Board is prepared to update the Council about the following areas of library service. • Update on overall Library operations • Update on Annual Patron Survey • Update on Library Life-Long Learning Programs • Update on Strategic Plan OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Goal #2: A wide array of opportunities for life-long learning are available in a variety of formats and used by the community. Goal #3: Adequate facilities are available for efficient delivery of life-long learning programs and services for all ages. ATTACHMENT LIST None. FISCAL NOTES None. Cathy Wheatley - BRDTERM2.DOC Page 1 LIBRARY BOARD ORIGINAL APPT. DATE/ CURRENT TERM EXPIRES DAVID BURKE - VICE-CHAIR PRO TEM 05-11-04 / 06-30-05 8986 SW Waverly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Res: 503-968-6384 Bus: 503-330-9512 E-Mail: davidburke04@yahoo.com MARVIN DIAMOND 07-11-00 / 06-30-07 13325 SW 72nd Avenue, Unit 3D Tigard, OR 97223 Res: 503-620-4282 Bus: 503-241-4784 E-Mail: resipse@aol.com SUE KASSON 05-27-97 / 06-30-05 16132 SW 113`h Avenue, Apt. 165 Tigard, OR 97224 Res: 503-620-9771 Bus: 503-670-0440 E-Mail: suekasson@hotmaii.com BRIAN KELLY 07-01-04 / 06-30-08 7045 SW Ventura Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Res: 503-293-2356 E-Mail: brian.kelly@mitrebox.net RUTHANNE LIDMAN - ALTERNATE 05-11-04 / 06-30-06 10200 SW Century Oak Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4643 Res: 503-684-0351 E-Mail: rlidman@comcast.net JANE SMITH 04-11-00 / 06-30-06 9200 SW Elrose Court Tigard, OR 97224 Res: 503-639-4622 E-Mail: jasmithpdx@aol.com JAN THENELL 07-01-01 / 06-30-05 17015 SW Versailles Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Res: 503-598-8472 E-Mail: jthenell@teleport.com Cathy Wheatley - BRDTERM2.DOC Page 2~ SUZAN TURLEY - CHAIR PRO TEM 06-25-02 / 06-30-07 11285 SW Meadowbrook Drive, #7 Tigard, OR 97224 Res: 503-620-1919 E-Mail: suzant@juno.com Margaret Barnes, Library Director - margaret@ci.tigard.or.us Connie Martin, Sr. Admin. Specialist - connie@ci.tigard.or.us Revised 9/24/04 Mar aret Barnes - Sunda stats Page 1 From: Linda Parker To: Connie Martin; Margaret Barnes Date: 3/14/2005 10:15:09 AM Subject: Sunday stats Hi Margaret Here are the basic stats for the last two Sundays: March 6. 1,211 Checkouts. 464 Gatecount March 13. 1,176 Checkouts. 441 Gatecount Linda '44Z2 CA CL AJ cxrrh CQ. ! ~ a 5'(o y = v r s , burs r- ~~~ti y~~ ~~ec-kns a-) Draft Talking Points Tigard Library Board Council Meeting-March 15, 2005 Annual survey: The annual Library survey of patrons was conducted February 7 through February 19. Surveys in both English and Spanish were handed out in the library and an English language survey was also available on the Library website. A total of 2830 surveys were collected, as compared to 1265 in February 2004. Of these, 60 were from the website and 27 were Spanish-language. 49% of patrons answering the survey said they used the library four or more times a month. Patrons were asked "If the library were able to be open more hours, which hours would you prefer." 71 % of respondents chose Sundays as their first choice 19% chose Friday evenings • 9.5% Saturdays evenings C~ Patrons were asked if they found the materials they were looking for when they came to the library. 31 % said Always, 61 % Sometimes, and only .75% answered Never. 76% of total respondents rated Reference desk service excellent or good, while 21.5% said they did not use the Reference desk and couldn't rate the service. That means that of the 2025 respondents who did use the Reference desk, 97.5% rated the service received as excellent or good. 94% of total respondents rated the service at the check-out desk as excellent or good. Of the respondents who said they actually used the check-out desk, 97.5% rated it as excellent or good. 51 % of respondents said they did not use the Children's Room desk, but of the 1204 that did, 97% rated the service provided here as excellent or good also. Question: Favorite Features... examples to be given out at the board Meeting Question: One thing to change... examples to be given out at the Board Meeting Sunday Hours: Gate Count information won't be available until March 14 Comments-given out at the Board Meeting Life-Long Learning-Programs for Adults and Children Picture Collage-Life Long Learning-Programs The new Library is a very busy place as you can see from these photos. 1 r Many people, both children and adults, come through the doors each day to use one of the 60 public access computers we have available. As a response to many requests, we have increased the hours of use for individuals from one to two hours per day. This provides for time to fill in applications online, write a new resume or compose the great American novel! The Youth Services work group has blossomed in their new space, seeing a steady increase in attendance at programs and story hours. Wonderful performers like Magical Strings and the Portland Taiko have entertained the generations from toddlers to grown- ups. Volunteers from the Bonnie L. Hays Small Animal Shelter share the calm presence of trained "reading helper" dogs to assist reluctant readers. The literature based program featuring the characters and tricks from the Lemony Snicket books drew over 100 middle-schoolers to the Library. The great author and educator, Dr. Seuss, is honored on his birthday with "Read Across America" day - this year providing stories and cupcake walks with a visit from the Cat in the Hat. Adults benefit from our beautiful new space as well, with program offerings and book displays. Paul Clark from the Tigard Area Historical and Preservation Association provided a talk on Tigard history for interested residents in the welcoming and warm Houghton Reading Room. The new library serves the citizens of Tigard with ❖ welcoming, useful spaces such as the study rooms, Local History Room and Houghton Reading Room; ❖ entertaining and educational programs for children, young adults and adults; ❖ displays of new and interesting books; ❖ computers for information and document preparation; ❖ and books! Wonderful, funny, interesting, challenging books on all subjects for all reading levels. August-February com arisons 03-04 to 04-05 Readers Services Numbers Aug 03--Feb Aug 04-Feb 04 05 Difference % difference Reference Desks Transactions 34,525 60,084 25,559 74.03% Youth Program Attendance 3,915 .4,977 1,062 27.13% Adult Program Attendance 303 722 419 138.28% Library Operations: Tigard Public Library has been open seven full months--August 2004 through February 2005. It is interesting to compare statistics for the similar period the previous year- August 2003 through February 2004. In the new library, the checkouts have increased by nearly 15%. New Library users registered have increased by a whooping 95%! The number of people walking into the library has increased by 30%. This has all been accomplished in less open hours and fewer days open-172 less hours, or nearly 10% less and 28 days less-about 13.5% less days open. The checkouts per hour have increased by 26.5%. Circulation Numbers August August 2003 2004 Through Through February February 2004 2005 Change % change Checkouts 371,121 423,538 38,464 14.80% Renewals 71,342 78,446 3,995 8.00% New Libra Users 2,467 4,235 1,521 95.06% Visitors 153,655 201,381 32,611 30.09% Hours of Service 1,756 1,584 -129 10.15% Days of Service 205 177 -20 .13.51% Self Check Out 19,350 33,364 10,118 73.61% Web-based renewals 25,298 33,533 5,416 31.98% materials circ/hr 211 267 7757 W.77% Library Specs: Outside drive-up book drop Courtyard-"Bricks for Books"-community support Beautiful Reading Room 48,000 square feet 3.5 times the old library Large community room Conference room Study rooms Technology room 14.7 acres of property Public Art-Bequest Money Additional comments from survey-will be given at Library Board Meeting Strategic Plan Talking Points will be given at the Library Board Meeting- Survey Management Website > February 2005 Library Survey > Tabulated Results Report Page 1 of 2 Survey Manaoement Website > February 2005 Library Survey > Tabulated Results Report Source: Library, Website Surveys submitted: 2830 Report generated: Thursday, March 03, 2605 - 1:57:44 PM 1.) How often do you visit this Library?. view comments .4 or more times a month 1356 48.83% 1-3 times a month 946 34.07% Less than once a month 274 , 9.87% First-time visitor 200 7.20% Never 1 0.04% Total 2777 100.00% 2.) How old are you? view comments 18 or younger 329 11.84% 19-25 233 8.39% 26-40 732 26.35% 41-60 1042 37.51% 61 or older 442 15.91% Total 2778 100.00% 3.) If the library were able to be open more hours, view which. hours would you prefer? comments Friday evenings until 8 PM (currently open o until 5 PM) 493 19.21 /o Saturday evenings until 8 PM (currently open a until 5 PM) 244 9.51 /o Open on Sundays 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM 1829 71.28% (currently not open Sundays) Total 2566 100.00% 4.) When you come to the library to look for a book, DVD, video, CD, magazine, or other a of material view type , comments do you find what you were looking for Always 834 31.22% Sometimes 1637 61.29% Never 20 0.75% Not applicable 180 6.74% Total 2671 100.00% 5.) Check-Out Desk view comments Excellent 1875 69.94% Good 651 24.28% Just OK 59 2.20% Poor 5 0.19% Don't Use 91 3.39% Total 2681 100.00% 6.) Reference Desk view comments . Excellent 1453 56.27% Good 521 20.18% Just OK 46 1.78% Poor 5 0.19% Don't Use 557 21.57% http://wvw.ci.tigard. or.us/online-services/surveys/manage/lib_feb_survey2005/reports/tabu... 3/3/2005 Survey Management Website > February 2005 Library Survey > Tabulated Results Report Page 2 of 2 Total 2582 100.00% 7.) Children's Room Desk view comments Excellent 902 36.74% Good 267 10.88% Just OK 32 1.30% Poor 3 0.12% Don't Use 1251 50.96% Total 2455 100.00% http://www.ci.tigard. or.us/online services/surveys/manage/lib_feb_survey2005/reports/tabu... 3/3/2005 Patron Rating of Service at Check-out Desk 80% 70 ° 7©x/0 - 17 60% ~52%.-. 0 Excellent 50% ■ Good o>o- 40 /0 t ~A~o El Just OK r fie' S%o r L - Poor 30% r{ : o ■ Don't Use 20% _ -10 /0 60° x o f 30,0 4 7 ° 35° 70% 40% 19. 0 /o 2002 2003 2004 2005 Patron Rating of Service at Reference Desk 80% 1470% 60% RExceller -d=~ae5 ■ Good 50% - 43 40% E ]Just OK 30% - El Poor ■ Don't U, 10%~ra° 36 °0.78 58 07.19° 00 0 /o 2002 .:2003 2004 2005 AGENDA ITEM # 3 FOR AGENDA OF March 15, 2005 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Joint Meeting With Skate Park Task Force PREPARED BY: Dan Plaza, 2590 DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK 41 Cm, ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Skate Park Task Force Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION No action required. INFORMATION SUMMARY The last joint meeting with the Skate Park Task Force was held on February 10, 2004. Rich Carlson, Task Force Chair, and other members of the Task Force will attend the March 15, 2005 joint meeting to discuss these and other matters with Council. The Task Force is currently in the process of joining with a local 501(c)(3) in preparation for the Task Force's fund raising campaign. The Task Force has raised, to date, approximately $12,000. They will be seeking cash donations, as well as in-kind contributions of services and materials such as; steel, concrete, earthwork, etc. City staff is working with a local skate park builder who is held in high esteem by the Task Force and many other skate park aficionados to "tweak" the current design so that it will be in a more rectangular configuration which would eliminate fewer parking spaces at City Hall. Further, City staff is talking to a retired contractor about his involvement as an independent contractor/project manager for the skate park fund raising and construction projects. The project manager would: 1) serve as the City's liaison with the Task Force and the contractor, 2) coordinate donations/in-kind services, etc., within the City's procurement process, and 3) provide technical expertise for the construction of the skate park. He would also assist the Task Force by providing technical and practical advice for fund raising efforts. The Task Force has prepared a fund raising packet which they will share with the Council at the March 15, 2005 meeting. Council has authorized staff to prepare and submit a grant application for a State of Oregon Local Government Grant funded by the State lottery. The grant is due on April 15, 2005. We will know by July 2005 whether or not the City received the grant. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED n/a VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY "Tigard Beyond Tomorrow" Recreation Goal #1, "Partnerships will provide a wide range of leisure and recreation opportunities that are coordinated and available for the Tigard community." ATTACHMENT LIST n/a FISCAL NOTES $150,000 - SDC matching funds $150,000 - State Grant $105,000 - Task Force Obligation $405,000 1 3 r O • ~ S • ~ ~R A r • ~ ~ yKpTF i 'nord Shale Park T' Rich (arlson, Skate Park Task force (hairman pAR~J 14250 SW 88th Ave. / Tigard, OR 97224 Tel: 503.224.0811 / Email: rich@teleport.com Dear Friends, We need your help! Former Tigard Mayor, Jim Griffith, believed in kids and he wanted to provide positive choices for Tigard youth. He created the Mayor's Youth Forum whose members immediately pointed out that the city did not have a place for kids to skateboard, in-line skate, or BMX bike. Mayor Griffith's vision was a place where youngsters, teens or adults could come together to skate or ride BMX bikes - a place that was accessible and was free. Skating and BMX biking are the fastest growing sports in the United States. For many kids, it is their only sport. When the community doesn't provide a place for these activities, young people are forced to skate or bike in public places where property may be damaged or they may be dangerous to pedestrians. . The City and the Skate Park Task Force which was formed from the Mayor's Youth Forum have worked with an architectural firm to lay out a conceptual design. Our kids are excited about the design because it has more "'street" features that any of the over 60 skate parks in other Oregon cities. The City has committed a part of a large parking lot in front of City Hall and the Police Station to be the site. The site will be easily monitored which should ensure that it is drug and alcohol free - safe for all of our kids and their families. The Skate Park will be named after Mayor Jim Griffith at the request of the young people on the Skate Park Task Force. Although it will cost $405,000 to build the park, the city will invest up to $150,000 and will apply for a state grant in the same amount. That means the Task Force will need to raise the balance of the funds through a combination of cash contributions, grants and in-kind donation of materials. Our young people cannot raise these kinds of funds on their own. Please help them with your charitable contribution to the Tigard Skate Park c/o Tigard Tums the Tide, a 503(c)(3) nonprofit corporation. If you have questions, please contact me at (503) 224-0871, (rich@teleport.com) or Pat Biggs, Treasurer, 14250 SW 88th Ave., Tigard, OR 97224, (503) 639-5337 (patbiggs@teleport.com). Please help Tigard youth build the Jim Griffith Memorial Skate Park. Very truly yours, Rich Carlson, Chairman Tigard Skate Park Task Force The Vision 9 ~Af In 1001, members of the 6,Itvor's Youth Gr om collected information about what services were being provided to - - 1 ' youth and what additional services were needed. They - noted that while there are many facilities and services available for other sports, Tigard lacked facilities for - skateboarders, in-line skaters and BMX bikes - sports popular with a large - R number of Tigard youth. 'The thing that impressed me Mayor Griffith established about Jim was how hard he the "Skatepark Task worhed, especially for the hills Force" to further pursue ~Pr_oviding a Safe Place the idea and named Rich He always wanted to be sure Carlson chairperson. the kids were involved. That C dedication is so important to thef o r Skate Boarding, Since then much work has been done by the task community. That's his legato - force. Early on, more than That's what I'll remember. 100 Tigard skaters, BMX ° ( I Line Skating & BMX -School Superintendent free-style bikers and their Steve Lowder parents participated in~ planning efforts. The City hired a professional landscape architecture firm to work with the task force on conceptual design, view online at www.tigardskatepark.com. sm Gi~K`~h A variety of sites were explored ! May °c and evaluated. After many public meetings, and much discussion, the task force unanimously endorsed the City Hall parking ° - Tigard Shoheparh J lot as the preferred City- owned site for the skate ? fundraising W001 t 14250 SW 88th Ave. park. Centrally located, _ highly visible, accessible via Tigard, OR 91224 public transportation, near the police Phone: 503.224.0811 department, lit at night, the site is ideal for the Skatepark! --L. www.tigardskatepark.com y F It's about supporting our young people bwd QO~IIg~~~JQ~~Oo an WOM T' - - o WU g! and steering them toward healthy lifestyles. The Tigard community understands the value of providing Wing ag soon ig o Og gQQ~~Q~O Contributions may be made with p opportunities for its youth to be active and engaged in cash or in-kind contributions of healthy "off the couch" activities. Talk to kids about skate Now mu(h will this (09! materials or services. All donors parks and they get excited! They voluntarily attend public will receive public recognition and a "We're On Board" meetings where they City Contribution (as matching funds) ...$150,000 bumper sticker. For more information on Platinum and (ugene = S Sliale60ard ParliS learn about community Grants $150,000 Gold Sponsorship please contact Rich Carlson (address below). (pop. 131,093) involvement, civic responsi- Community Fundraising .......$105,000 linfoln (ity =1 Skateboard Parks bility, collaboration, public Yes, 1 want to help. WR 1,431) process and ownership. Total Cost .............$405,000 loreg Cron =1 Skateboard ParliS Giving young people an become : El I wish to contribute In-Kind Materials of (pop 10,100) opportunity to A community fund-raising campaign is now underway to , Tigard = 0 Skateboard Parks involved in the community, come up with additional funds needed. This campaign is (example: Concrete, Rebar_ & Reinforcement Ties, Steel Pipe, water) (pop. 44,010) builds on their strengths being run through a non-profit organization "Tigard Turns and gives them ho for ~ ❑ I wish to contribute In-Kind Labor g hope the Tide whose mission is to empower the youth of the future. Our Tigard Skatepark is enabling our youth Tigard to feel valued by the community, provide (example: Earthmoving, Grading, Fabricating Steel, Irrigation) to develop leadership skills and interact with other opportunities to make a difference in W , young people with the same interests. society, and work to prevent ❑ I wish to make a cash donation of: $10, $25, $50, $100, Other: W drug and alcohol use and Tigard provides baseball fields, sower fields abuse among the. our and bashetball courts but has no 10(ilities youth of o Name: community. Address: for the fastest growing sport among City: State: Zip: We are seeking private a young people in the U.S. and public grants from Daytime Phone: Evening Phone: - everywhere is a shateporh! several sources. Young people Email: One of the concerns of the City and local businesses are involved in various fund ° is that skateboarding can cause damage to public and raising activities. Make your check payable to Tigard Skate Park and mail to... private facilities. When skating in parking lots and on And we are counting on Tigard Skakepark Fundraising Campaign sidewalks, and mixing with vehicle and pedestrian traffic, YOU the local Community! The 14250 SW 88th Ave. / Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard Skatepark c/o Tigard Turns the Tide is a S01 (c) (3) non-profit organization. skaters put themselves and others at risk. By building skate park will be a benefit to the ; All donations are tax-deductible as allowed by Law. a safe, legal spot to skate we offer a place for skaters whole community, so we want to reach For more information, a complete list of needed materials and labor, to enjoy their sport and not be in conflict with vehicles, out to everyone in town -businesses, parents, schools or to get involved with the fund-raising effort, please contact: Richard Carlson, Chair Phone: 503.224.0811 EMAIL: rich@teleport.com pedestrians and the business community. and service organizations or visit www.tigardskatepark.com M ON BOARD t. : Name/Company: BAR - Contact: Moil your contribution plus the original Address: and one copy of this ~ rm to: State: Zip Code: Tigard Skakepark City. 114250 SW 88th Ave. ` Phone Email: Tigard, OR 92224 Phone: 503.114.4$71 ❑ I/We pledge the amount of $ www.t`gardskatepark.com ~3i ❑ I/We pledge the In-kind gift of. T Ski eta } c:o Tg~~~~rns ire T;de s c 5011 0!w'!2AL0~. ~1~ OOROIt~tY 0'E IO.tv~P~L°CII[k'E 9S GilJ'~c~ EY ~.QMI 1 1 TOTAL CONTRIBUTION VALUE $ Contribution received by I/We are making the above contribution to the Tigard Skate Park c/o Tigard Turns the Tide as part of a community fund raising campaign to build the Jim Griffith Memorial Skate park in Tigard. I/We further understand Pledge received by that all contributions will be applied in furtherance of the final design and construction of the skate park. Confirmotion of Contributor: Name of fund raising volunteer M Name Tide Date ' i o Q o 0 d D , SITE WORK ROUGH AND FINISH PHASE y Asphalt Removal Framing Materials Grading • . / 90-120 sheets of 5/8 CDX Plywood, 2x4's 2000 - 2400 lineal ft., misc. lumber Safety Fencing ei~q Concrete Pumping (with air compressor) Drainage Waterproofing (concrete sealant) Evercrete Landscaping Excavation - large excavator for two-three days, bobcat throughout the project, labor Rebar - 2500 - 3500 pieces 3/8 20' lengths Questions? Please contact Rich Carlson, Chair at Concrete - 440-600 yards 4000 PSI concrete Phone: 503.114.0811 Coping - 2" schedule 40 pipe rich@teleport.com i Crushed Rock - 300- 400 3/4 minus crushed rock- depending on the existing soil Tigard Skakepark 14250 SW 88th Ave. • Tigard, OR 91224 Sidewalks Tigard Skatepark do Tigard Tams the Tide a 501(c) (3) noo-profrt organization. Grind Rails M d o n o t i o n s a r e t a x - d e d u c ti b l e as ollowed ~ law Guard Rail y ij LEARN MORE: www.tigardskatepark.com ,sAU \ ~I II0 0 11 3l: iii :WT-12 2" I ~ ~ ~7 + ,r•'., -2.5• Ik IIH:CH30UCD.2,V 1 IEj .lair : y, Wffm r t SLOPED PLCN'X 3AR AND LEOCES -S TABLE WATERFALL 3ANKS SUU3 B; SARK SETTING; _ a4 KINKED t'~GE ~~i - 1. _ lir' • P 1 P 1 r I WfTH COPINL - .~S S P +I I Af 1 r2"' ,A,'"~•` 3 r' - + !DNG~ ••BANKS 1l4PIPEHIP, - - _ tN -S. d. a. 0 ffSET 114 PIPES - d t I OF_fSTIJ<PIPES -5• ?f~ ` { P P ,I LAUNCH PS ° 4 ' - S J~ sl I S 1 1's 1 117/ - _S. fy r ~ . . , y t C PAD A.CS d o - ! .04 a C ; - 6 •P~t M11tiWLL BA X00 4. G- / .l 'f b - g4}~ yid ~'r SFWc ';~L } 1 I r t,r,~_ MO STEP WITH CAP :r yti:~ r r3ax1 ~,,.:P III v I y -3.3 HI _l. LONG ,c ( r c,; I ~ LEDGE 3 ; LANDING PAD 'F - .4 - r- ~ - ° it~cli ? _ ;LAi 3Ait L 4 . g T S i- BOUIN . 5' 15,000 5.E 30X WITH BM'KS 11 i .I ,_.ti.1" - 4 d -.'(INKED LEDGE'=- - - S ti i C i a4- PY3AM{} d ID WR-ri - J~-•~5,.' -S• i SLOPEOlEDG6 j 25.000 S.F. 0 ' t o 'BLOCKS SIXS'Tc -5. WIiH,A.T FOUBSt-P~ _ f - WITH LEOGES PARK S ETTI N 4 - •04 <}J\~ 3 f~li'I'` f~}i 'tt##~"`-'2'"'~Ii %v0T -t 1 p :p•- ' ',J \ ~I Oa~'. t ~MM3OXWIT}I -1 - r.L..f`.' CI r-. LEDGES AND+ -3' 31G 3LOCK5 FLAT BAR - I - IERSEY 3AA.RLR CHAIN GAP , + r ROLL IN ~ : "A' II 8 STEP U . 1 p t; '~SUSafi,. x'"' ~-t ~ WIT' RAIL Illll ` + f 5 s r a- 7 ` 1 Fri 3AR I - I ! wr 1ia"c., EVENT PLAZA - ,uca Fr, d f ilk F V-F i S TEPARK ammASTER PLAN TIGAR SKATEPARK SCALE: I" ® 1010 01o TIGAR®9 OREGON r dip 40P o ~ I r ~ rhe Vision In 1001, members of the mayor's Youth Nrum collected information about what services were being provided to youth and what additional services were needed. They noted that while there are many facilities and services available for other sports, Tigard lacked facilities for skateboarders, in-line skaters and BMX bikes - sports popular with a large number of Tigard youth. Mayor Griffith established the "Skatepark Task Force" to further pursue the idea and named Rich Carlson, chairperson. "The thing that impressed me Since then much work has been done by the task force. Early on, more than about lim was how hard he 100 Tigard skaters, BMX free-style bikers and their parents participated in planning efforts. The City hired a professional landscape architecture firm to Worh@d, especially for the bids. He work with the task force on conceptual design. The resulting design is always wanted to he sure the kids included in this informational packet. were involved. That dedication is so A variety of sites were explored and evaluated. After many public meetings, important to the community. and much discussion, the task force unanimously endorsed the City That's his legacy. Hall parking lot as the preferred City-owned site for the skate park. That's what I'll remember. Centrally located, highly visible, accessible via public transportation, o~ ~01\ May near the police department, lit at night, the site is ideal for the skatepark! - School Superintendent Steve Lowder dormer Mayor Im Sri f f ilh will loop be remembered • Invest in our hills. • Mahe it accessible, sate and free for everyone to use. for his uuwauerino commis em to the youth of Tigard. • Build it as big as we can with durable materials. He uodemood the value of ennitog youno people in the public : Involve shoters and BMX riders throughout the process. Establish rules and regulations before opening the park and process. The share park will be named in his houof. PPT IQ guQQQOo Important! J 0 00 0 0 0 2mpd QO~ilg~~~Jdlo al Mom ~1g mul Cg Wiflg 0 ON gQQuT o T. How much will this cost? City Contribution (as matching funds) .....$150,000 Grants .....................$150,000 a tremendous asset for our (ommunitU The 5hat@pafh i5 immensely popular with youth Community Fundraising ..........$105,000 of many 002 groups and is the one pla(e in Total Cost .................$405,000 town where you always see a mixture of youngsters and teens, [loth hays and girls, 0(tiuely playing and slating tog21hQrif ou Pnd-mosono 01od0 is sue ~0 52 Rahed as we OH PHU wvk! - Lou Ogden, Mayor of Tualatin The City of Tigard is providing the land, and a matching contribution of up to $150,000 in SDC funds. The City is also hoping to secure a matching grant from the State. A private fund-raising campaign is now underway to come up with additional funds needed. This campaign is being run through a non-profit organization "Tigard Turns the Tide" whose mission is to empower the youth of Tigard to feel valued by the community, provide opportunities to make a difference in society, and work to prevent drug and alcohol use and abuse among the youth of our community. We are seeking private and public grants from several sources. Young people are involved in various fund raising activities. And we are counting on YOU the local Community! The skate park will be a benefit to the whole community, so we want to reach out to everyone in town -businesses, parents, schools and service organizations We need your help. So please be generous and get on board! The Need 1 .I Oregon Cities Support Skateboard Parks! ~ogar~~ ~aa~~ a AmPOTN Wane o 0 It's about supporting our young people and steering them toward healthy lifestyles. The Tigard community understands the value of providing opportunities for its youth to be active and engaged in healthy "off the couch" activities. Talk to kids about skate parks and they get excited! They voluntarily attend public meetings where they learn about community involvement, civic responsibility, collaboration, public process and ownership. Giving young people an opportunity to become involved in the community builds on their strengths and gives them hope for the future. Our Tigard Skatepark is enabling our youth to develop leadership skills and interact with other young people with the same interests. Tigard (urrently has no place for skating to occur safely and legalli And without a safe, legal shating area - everywhere is a shateparho One of the concerns of the City and local businesses is that skateboarding can cause damage to public and private facilities. When skating in parking lots and on sidewalks, and mixing with vehicle and pedestrian traffic, skaters put themselves and others at risk. By building a safe, legal spot to skate we offer a place for skaters to enjoy their sport and not be in conflict with vehicles, pedestrians and the business community. Skateboarding, in-line skating and 3A~ free-style are three of the most popular re(reational a(tivities for young people ages 8-10. D Innovations in technology, product design and the boom in construction of skate parks have created a sport that is much more than a 'passing fad'. Skateboarding is a sport that has survived and thrived for over 50 years. D International TV coverage and the low cost of equipment have resulted in the creation of one of the most popular individual 'pick-up' sports in the world. D Board Trac, who surveys sporting good purchases, estimated there were 13 million skateboarders nationwide in 2003 an estimated 240% increase in 10 years. D An assessment of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State found that skateboarding is the fourth most frequently performed outdoor activity for all ages; falling just behind walking, jogging, and gardening but ahead of soccer, football, tennis, baseball, swimming and golf. D The Skate Park Assoc. of the USA estimated that there are 1 million BMX bike riders in the nation. D National Sporting Goods Manufacturers Assoc. estimated in 2000 - 29 million in-line skaters. M ire = ~GateWrd pflFz lesear(h shows that youth who are involved in positive development a(tivities d~, (alp ~itU = gCatear pares during adolescence, are less likely to involve (~t~ IAN) themselves in rishy behaviors such al(ohol, • tobauo and other drug use." ~c~st „ro~~ _ ~ ~P~at~~~ar~ °ar~ss oreW wenc slaap.b (m NAM - AYouth Development Approach Tigard = 0 Shateboard Parks - Reconnecting Youth and the Community ` •i6AY"'"""'° (poi 44,010) U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources Get On Board! Your support is needed. %m piodes bogeboll Rlds`souu Nis Ong bogheodl uuns bm his no Ndkies DoT ~ . • pAR~ fie Nqes~ y4flg span among Voung people on AQ U.S. Skaters Boarders BMX Blokes o~ R ,~q • Rich Carlson, Tigard's Skate Park Taskforce Chair, stated, "It is wonderful to see the Council continue to support the efforts of the kids that have been working on this project for so long. As many communities in Oregon and across the country have recognized, this is the type of Community Park that will be used by hundreds of kids on a daily basis. While we still have a major community fundraising effort in front of us, the City's continued support is very much appreciated". POA suome a paneo ~ ofl AQ Hew %ad shl~Q o lUJ D o o 0 o Contributions may be made with cash or in-kind contributions of materials or services. All donors will receive public recognition and a "We're On Board" bumper sticker. Platinum and Gold sponsors will also receive permanent recognition in the skatepark. QUMUS: From $10 to a truck-load of cement ...all levels of contributions are welcomed and appreciated. Wd Spot TS: $5000-$9999 All Gold Sponsors will receive both public and permanent recognition in the skate park. HEIRUM SPORSOFS: $10,000+ All Platinum Sponsors will receive both public and permanent recognition in the skate park. Your name or logo will appear on all future advertisements and publications as a proud sponsor of Tigard Skate Park. IN) C~OH21k(3o Make your check payable to Tigard Skate Park and mail to... Tigard Skakepark Fundraising Campaign 14250 SW 88th Ave. Tigard, OR 91224 For more information, or to get involved with the fund-raising effort, contact: Richard Carlson, Chair / Phone: 503.224.0811 / EMAIL: rich@teleport.com. or visit www.tigardskatepark.com Mere Will the Shalegarh be located? The ideal site has been identified. The new park will be located near city hall and police station, using a portion of the parking lot that once served the old library. The area is centrally located. It's on a bus line, lighted, and has bathrooms and telephones available at fity Hall. Since the fity owns the site there will be no land acquisition costs. ?HOW did YOU Me Up With the design! The fity hired a professional landscape design consultant to work with the taskforce to complete the conceptual design and provide a cost estimate for construction. Approximately 100 youth and adults helped create the design through three public involvement meetings. The resulting conceptual design includes a mix of features that will appeal to novices and at the same time offer plenty of challenge for experienced riders. The design includes concrete bowls, ridges, a pyramid, and other "street skating" and "free style" elements desired by skateboarders, in-line skaters, and BMX free-style riders. The features can be combined to create many unique "lines" or circuits at various levels. The features have a maximum height of five feet and will be constructed of extra strong concrete with steel edging for durability and safety. Further refinement of the park design will occur as part of a design-build process under design leadership of a professional skate park contractor. ?M6 going 10 PQ for it! Funding will come from both public and private sources. The City of Tigard is providing the land plus up to $150,000, and will apply for a matching State grant, which will effectively double their contribution. A private fund-raising campaign is currently underway to come up with additional funds needed for construction. The taskforce is seeking private and public grants and matching funds from several sources. Young people on the taskforce are actively involved with various fundraising efforts. And finally, we are counting on YOU - the local (ommunity! The skate park will be a benefit to the whole community, so we want to reach out to everyone in town - businesses, parents, schools and service organizations. ?Is this really a good investment, or just a gassing fad, Based on what we are hearing from neighboring cities (Tualatin, Beaverton, Newberg, Hillsboro and Portland) skate parks are indeed a good investment and not just a passing fad. One of the most consistent messages we hear when talking to other cities and municipalities is that, "We wish we had built ours bigger, we wish we had money to build another, and please hurry up and build yours to take the pressure off ours." Built right, this will be a good and lasting investment and an excellent addition to the recreational opportunities available in our community. "Building a shale garh in Tigard aren't you just AN for trouble with fighting, drugs, and gangS! The experience of Would show the youth of Tigard that (ity other communities with skate parks is that fighting, drugs, and gangs are usually not a government and (itilenS of Tigard greatly problem. Skating and free-style biking are the usual activities. Skaters and bikers practice (are about the issues f a(ing today's youth. and show their skills to each other. They teach and support each other, and self-regulate behavior, A shalegarh viould give the youth of Tigard taking turns using favorite features. The Tigard skate park will have an added safety advan- tage being located right next to the police station. It's going to be a safe, drug and alcohol- a Sense that their UOI(eS (an be heard and free environment for all to enjoy. that the adults of today are listening." - Seam Belveal, Tigard Police Activities League Director Men WIII the shale garh be open WE! E! The site is already available, so construction can begin when funding is in place. If all goes as planned, the park could be open for use in late 2005 or spring 2006. Y d.f More F.A. Q l not all teens z young adults play saver or basketball. We must 0150 meet the recreational needs of those who prefer skating, boarding A biking to competitive, team-oriented Sports." Who will maintain the park, The City of Tigard. - Craig Dirksen, Mayor of Tigard font the City's liability insurance go Sky high, No. There will not be an increase in the City's insurance premium. The insurer views skate parks as they do other park features such as playgrounds, sports fields, swimming pools, and basketball courts. However, the skate park must be properly designed and maintained. This is one reason the City hired an experienced consulting firm to plan the skate park. dill DAR bikes be allowed in the skate park! Yes. The BMX bike community is strong in Tigard. They, too, need a safe, legal location to practice their skills. A good number of young people who enjoy BMX riding have been active members of the Tigard Skatepark since its inception. Mat is being done to assure that the park is inviting, sale, secure, and built in a way that is as environmentally sensitive as possible! There will be minimal disruption of natural environment as the site is an existing parking lot. Planned site improvements will make the most of surrounding natural areas with trees planted on the periphery providing shaded areas with picnic tables and benches where spectators can view the action. Trash bins will be placed on site, and the City will maintain the park. Quality construction materials that are least susceptible to the elements will be used in construction. Located next to the police station, and lit at night, this park will be safe and secure 24-1. ?Where can I get more information? 100 '0 0 , ` - Contact Skate Park Taskforce Chairperson Rich Carlson at rich @ teleport.com or (503) 224-0811. ~ \ or visit www.tigardskatepark.com. 0 00" 0 '00 - 0 ~y F 0 .10 O T' p. 0 A AGENDA ITEM # "-I FOR AGENDA OF 3/15/05 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Joint Meetin with Downtown Task Force wn date PREPARED BY: Jim HendW DEPT HEAD OK e,4.KGR OK (°Jr ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Council will be updated on the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan's progress and have the opportunity to discuss the plan with Task Force members. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. INFORMATION SUMMARY For FY 2004-2005, the City received a Transportation and Growth Management Grant (TGM) from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to create the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan. In four months, the Plan will be complete. The Downtown Task Force has worked with the Tigard community and project consultants to develop the Plan, which focuses on the green "heart" of Tigard (Fanno Creek), natural and public spaces, and creating a vibrant urban village. Over the next months, the Task Force will meet with 20 different groups of Tigard citizens (Community Dialogs #2) to get their comments, hold an April 23rd Open House, explore funding options, and finalize the plan. When complete, the Plan will provide a short- and long-term strategy for Downtown improvements, including recommended approaches to funding. Council will review the Plan in July 2005. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Community Character and Quality of Life/Central Business District Goal #1, Provide opportunities to work proactively with Tigard Central Business District Association (TCBDA) businesses and property owners and citizens of Tigard to set the course for the future of the central business district. ATTACHMENT LIST None. FISCAL NOTES None. I:\LRPLN\Council Materials\3 15 05 Task Force Update AIS.doc DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE MEMBERS JIM ANDREWS JANICE ARAVE CAROLYN BARKLEY MARTHA BISHOP IOSHLIA CHANEY KEN DAWSON CRAIG DIRKSEN HEATHER GLIEVARA MARLAND H ENDERSON PALIL IFORD (YOUTH LIAISON) CHRIS LEWIS MIKE MARR SUSAN MORELLI JUDY MUNRO DAN MURPHY LISA OLSON NICOLE PALMATEER YLIDHI PATEL CATHERINE RENKEN JAN RICHARDSON MIKE STEVENSON JOHN WILSON SUE WIRICK ~I 7-a,,WC March 9, 2005 ty. "t" - V; d~p-d Gxvz~ Tigard City Council & ;t; Downtown Task Force c/o Beth St. Amand at downtown@ci.tigard.or.us 3' and Julia Hajduk at Julia@ci.tigard.or.us Dear Ms. St. Amand and Ms. Hajduk: Kathy and 1 mailed a letter to the Downtown City Council & Downtown Task Force on September 23, 2004. Because we do not know whether the letter was read and our thoughts considered, we wish to resubmit questions and concerns pertaining to the Downtown Improvement Plan: 1. Presently there exists an Ash Avenue and an Ash Drive. We cannot find an Ash Street on any map of Tigard. Are you planning to change the name of a street or are you, in fact, refering to either Ash Avenue or Ash Drive? 2. In 1991, extensive discussions regarding the extension of Ash Avenue took place. Tigard City Council put the idea to rest based upon data gathered at that time. Has the Task Force studied the minutes of those meetings for an historic perspective on today's plans? 3. At a Task Force led meeting held at 13220 S.W. Ash Drive on October 5, 2004, Ash Avenue neighbors were told that there were no plans to extend Ash Avenue into downtown Tigard. At the Developers' Focus Group meeting of March 2, 2005, Mayor Dirksen indicated that the extension of Ash Avenue had been part of the city plan since at least 1999. Exactly when was the Ash Avenue extension idea returned to Tigard's city plan and by whom? 4. Also, at the Developers' Focus Group meeting of March 2, 2005, it was stated that the Ash Avenue (Street) extension is a "critical part" of the Downtown Improvement Plan. How long has the extension been considered critical, why is it critical, and if it is truly critical, why were the Ash Avenue residents in attendance at the October 5, 2004 meeting told it was not in the plan at all? 5. Considering the scope of the Improvement Plan as depicted in the Refined Design Alternative dated March 3, 2005, what specific research data has been gathered concerning the following issues: a. projected traffic flow increase on Ash Avenue b. environmental impact to wetland areas c. traffic speed control on sloping Ash Avenue d. parking on Ash Avenue e. pedestrian safety on Ash Avenue f. bicycle safety on Ash Avenue g. noise level increase in Ash Avenue neighborhood h. neighborhood security with increased transient traffic i. impact on neighborhood property values j. cost to taxpayers to realize your visions k. impact upon existing businesses 6. What is the specific alignment of the planned street extension from Walnut Street at Highway 99, across Fanno Creek, and into downtown Tigard? What private property must be acquired? Are all property owners in agreement to sell? 7. Who, specifically, owns the property on which the downtown improvements are to be built? 8. How, exactly, can a downtown redevelopment plan of this magnitude, that includes visions of anchor businesses like Barnes and Noble, as mentioned at the March 2, 2005 meeting, do anything but generate even more traffic congestion on already crowded Tigard streets and Highway 99? Sincerely, Daniel Strauss Kathy Strauss 9565 S.W. Frewing Court Tigard, Oregon 97223 503.620.7748 TIGARD DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN c;t..of Tigard COMMUNITY DIALOG PACKET CONTENTS 1 FACILITATION INSTRUCTIONS 2 SUMMARY OF GREAT IDEAS & DISTRICTS 3 District 1 - MAIN STREET DISTRICT 4 District 2 - ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT 5 District 3 - COMMERCIAL STREET DISTRICT 6 District 4 - REGIONAL RETAIL DISTRICT 7 District 5 - HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 8 District 6 - CIVIC DISTRICT 9 District 7 - FANNO CREEK RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 10 COMMENT MATRIX TIGAR0 DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN I PAGE 1 ;NOfT;gard FACILITATION INSTRUCTIONS Parametrix Steps to the successful facilitation of a Community Dialog event - ■ Introductions ® Purpose of Meeting This is a reality check - we are here to present the plan and take your specific comments about recommended changes or additions to make the.plan better. Described the packet - overview of Districts, Catalyst Projects, Brand Tigard Projects and a Comment Matrix - indicating that you would like them to leave page 10, the Comment Matrix with you. ® The Plan The Plan has taken shape over the past 6 months with community input (Community Dialog #1, workshop, Task Force meetings) and will be finalized this June. The Plan currently consists of Great Ideas - six things that will make downtown Tigard unique. Districts - seven sub-areas within downtown distinguished by the type of activity envisioned. Catalyst Projects - eight public and private projects that are designed to cause a complementary development reaction of surrounding properties. Brand Tigard Projects - Public projects designed to support the catalyst projects - street improvements, beautification, parks and public spaces, pedestrian paths, fountains and water features, etc. Implementation and Financing Tools - these are being developed by the consulting team and will be tailored over the next few months to best implement the Final Plan. ® Dialog Process Page 2 - read the Great Ideas and Districts and request that participants follow along on the map Pages 3-9 - while participants continue to follow along on the map, read the location, vision and catalyst projects in bold type. Make reference to the Brand Tigard Projects as the public infrastructure required to support the catalyst projects. Take questions encouraging balanced input from all participants Ask participants to record their comments on page 10, Comment Matrix. Encourage them to be positive, constructive and specific about what they think would improve the plan. TIGARD DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN I PAGE 2- City Ofrigard GREAT IDEAS & DISTRICTS J! Parametrix The Plan is organized into seven Districts supporting six Great Ideas for making Tigard unique. GREAT 1 D EAS Developed through community outreach, these are the things that make this plan uniquely Tigard - 1 Evolution of Main Street Atwo-sided retail street with unique small-scale shops bordered to the south by a pedestrian promenade with pocket parks, fountains and plazas. 2 The Heart of Downtown A central gathering place adjacent to Fanno Creek supporting a diverse range of activities including farmers market, entertainment, restaurants, retail and housing. 3 Mixed Use Urban Village Awalkable village with ample opportunity for all ages to live, work and play. 4 A New Transportation System A safe and well connected street system providing walking, bicycle, auto and transit access throughout downtown. g Green Connections A pervasive blend of pedestrian oriented natural features throughout downtown including wide sidewalks, linear parks, water features, trees, native landscaping, pocket parks and plazas, etc. 6 Transit Options Service and facilities enhancements designed to meet the needs of Tigard's growing downtown employment, residential and visitor population. DISTRICTS (see reference numbers on map) 0 Main Street District 0 Entertainment (Arts & Culture) District © Commercial Street District 0 Regional Retail District 0 Hillside (Hall Blvd.) Residential District 0 Civic District 0 Fanno Creek Residential District TIGARD DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN I PAGE 3 Parametrix City of Tigard 1. MAIN STREET DISTRICT Location. Centered on Main Street between 99W and Scoffins St. Vision. Preserve and enhance the historical downtown character while opening a "new face" to the rest of downtown. Projects. CATALYST PROJECTS BRAND TIGARD PROJECTS 1. Hall Blvd. Regional Retail 1. Fanno Creek Clean Up and Access 2. Ash St. Extension Area 2. Main St. Beautification 3. Post Office 3. Streetscape Improvements 4. Fanno Cr. Public Area 4. Gateways and Landmarks 5. Transit Center Residential 5. Linear Park Along Rail 6. Urban Creek Amenity 6. Water Features 7. Burnham "Great Street" 8. Fanno Cr. Bridge Ono i5 VO~1J~OlN - nn nn(~~ nn ~LI~S~~LIV °~Lf U o ors Boa ~o. a a~ c @MK19@Vooa _ • FUOMa 3 TIGARD DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN I PAGE 4 City ofTignd 2. ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT Parametrix Location. The physical center of downtown connecting the Fanno Creek natural area with the Hall Blvd. / Hwy. 99 Regional Retail District. Vision. A mixed-use core of live, work and play activities including live/work space, performing arts, community gathering and celebration space, and arts related office and retail. Projects. CATALYST PROJECTS BRAND TIGARD PROJECTS 1. Hall Blvd. Regional Retail 1. Pedestrian facilities 2. Ash St. Extension Area 2. Transit Platform 3. Post Office 3. Park & Ride 4. Fanno Cr. Public Area 4. RR Crossing 5. Transit Center Residential 5. Linear Park Along Rail 6. Urban Creek Amenity 6. New Street - Ash St. to Park & Ride 7. Burnham "Great Street" 7. Gateway 8. Fanno Cr. Bridge WOMB U@lm CCIO MM400GJ V [ ~ @12RE[Vl. 4G~a~3a4 W W IJLAS ° ° LfV " ° ~~lY~o dao fl=&0~ TIGARO DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN I PAGE 5 CitiofTigard 3. COMMERCIAL STREET DISTRICT _ -arametrix Location. Central E-W axis connecting the heart of Main Street with Hall Boulevard. Vision. A horizontally mixed-use corridor supporting affordable housing and commercial uses complementary to Main Street. Projects. CATALYST PROJECTS BRAND TIGARD PROJECTS 1. Hall Blvd. Regional Retail 1. Pedestrian facilities 2. Ash St. Extension Area 2. Transit Center Improvements 3. Post Office . 3. Access to Park & Ride 4. Fanno Cr. Public Area 4. RR Crossings 5. Transit Center Residential 5. New Street - Commercial St. to Scoffins St. 6. Urban Creek Amenity 6. Linear Park Along Rail 7. Burnham "Great Street" 8. Fanno Cr. Bridge W C V@1U.U000U o ltV~ll u . ~Q ° L ~UV U l~J °VLf'Do V p UCH JQaa Gi]~QG°34 C oaaC~C~40QGa OG?~'i 0oa 3 ~n _ d _ _ ff L W TIGARn DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN I PAGE 6 Cih of Tigard 4. REGIONAL RETAIL DISTRICT , Parametrix Location. Bordered by Hall Boulevard, Hwy 99W and Scoffins St. Vision. Stand alone "medium box" retail with pedestrian orientation to a new public amenity based intersection. Projects. CATALYST PROJECTS BRAND TIGARD PROJECTS 1. Hall Blvd. Regional Retail 1. Pedestrian facilities 2. Ash St. Extension Area 2. Public Plaza 3. Post Office 3. Streetscape Improvements to Scoffins St. 4. Fanno Cr. Public Area 4. Water Features 6. Transit Center Residential 5. New Street - Commercial St. to Hall Blvd. 6. Urban Creek Amenity 6. Hall Boulevard Improvements 7. Burnham "Great Street" 8. Fanno Cr. Bridge 1RW@1UV0oa ME %a OF KQOM o.. Czl °3~ C~IOd~C~( ~3~` ~1'C~G OQi~]I 1CC 40011 0 ° O@M,3 TIGARD DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN PAGE 7 Parametrix City of Tigard 5. HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Location. Fronting Hall Boulevard from Garden Place to Commercial Street. Vision. Residential boulevard with a variety of innovative high density housing including rental and owner- occupied mid- and high-rise. Projects. CATALYST PROJECTS BRAND TIGARD PROJECTS 1. Hall Blvd. Regional Retail 1. Pedestrian facilities 2. Ash St. Extension Area 2. Pocket Parks and Plazas 3. Post Office 3. Streetscape Improvements to Scoffins St. 4. Fanno Cr. Public Area 4. Water Features 5. Transit Center Residential 5. Hall Boulevard Improvements 6. Urban Creek Amenity 6. New street - Commercial St. to Hall Blvd. 7. Burnham "Great Street" 8. Fanno Cr. Bridge Q Q :C~IOdM4~0[~ 4G1]C~ _[~t]D~C~D .MIL o . ~ C~G°3C~C~[; l 4 ° ° `a ~4 W W . MG3C3G°~[~ 4G3G~~[~l~3pOo p @ Wa[][vl 1254o M ° 4 CEO[ ]I~]C C~4~OI l Op4~bl~J~3 . TIGARO DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN I PAGE 8 Cite of Tigard 6. CIVIC DISTRICT , Parametrix Location. Centered on Burnham St and anchoring the southern end of downtown. Vision. Civic, office and flex related employment with ample connections to existing and new amenities such as the Fanno Creek natural area and pedestrian connections to Main St. Projects. CATALYST PROJECTS BRAND TIGARD PROJECTS 1. Hall Blvd. Regional Retail 1. Pedestrian facilities 2. Ash St. Extension Area 2. Pocket Parks and Plazas 3. Post Office 3. Streetscape Improvements to Burnham St. 4. Fanno Cr. Public Area 4. Water Features 5. Transit Center Residential 5. Fanno Creek Clean up and Access 6. Urban Creek Amenity 6. Hall Boulevard Improvements 7. Burnham "Great Street" 7. Potential Long-Term RR undercrossing 8. Fanno Cr. Bridge at Hall Blvd. WORD I;flRm LSV~~I~J~~~W ~LtiJ~ ~n{~ /urn r,,~ M n ~LI~LS~~ . U ° U~1~Q U ' . W W lJ1J ° /:.1UV U ° W~L~~a ~ o • o~ ~i~°a~a .`~.~o. a~a~ _ . c~oac:~~~oo~ . o~~~a~ - TIGARD DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN PAGE 9 7. FANNO CR. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Parametrix .I City of Tigard - Location. Adjacent to the Fanno Cr. natural area between the Civic District and the Ash St. extension to Burnham St. Vision. A natural amenity focused, owner-occupied "green" condominium community. Projects. CATALYST PROJECTS BRAND TIGARD PROJECTS 1. Hall Blvd. Regional Retail 1. Pedestrian facilities 2. Ash St. Extension Area 2. Pocket Parks and Plazas 3. Post Office 3. Streetscape Improvements to Burnham St. 4. Fanno Cr. Public Area 4. Water Features 5. Transit Center Residential 5. Fanno Creek Clean up and Access 6. Urban Creek Amenity 7. Burnham "Great Street" 8. Fanno Cr. Bridge tlG°Qo[~J Uo ; GJC G3' C~O[~I~I@UG9K DoDcL [ TICCARD DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN PAGE 110 City of Tigard COMMENT MATRIX -J1 Parametrix PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR OPINION Check here if you support as proposed Check here if you would change" Main Street District 2 Entertainment District 3 Commercial Street District 4 Regional Retail District 5 Hillside Residential District 6 Civic District Fanno Creek Residential District * Recommended Changes orAdditional Ideas: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Meet the Downtown Take the First Step... Join us as we plan for The Downtown Task Force is composed of 24 Downtown's Future. volunteers appointed by the Tigard City Council. Attend our meetings: We are residents, roe and small business owners - we are your neighbors. (Sept 16, Nov. 4, Jan. 6, Feb. 10, • , _ March 3,April 23, May 26) Talk with aTask Force member: / ■ Small group discussions will be ; held Sept.-Oct. and in Jan.-Feb. Yo, V /W 0,4,W,01 ■ Email us a comment "0 - N, downtown @ci.tigard.or. us ■ Contact the staff liaison below if you're interested in holding a dialogue. R Workshop - December 2: Roll up your sleeves and give us your I ideas. Open House -April 23: How has the plan taken shape? Provide your comments. m Vist the Downtown Task Force web page: www.ci.tigard.or.us/downtown Downtown Task Force Members - l Join the Mailing List or Contact All - theTask Force Staff Liaison: Associate are committed to strengthening our Planner Beth $tAmand ; Email: beth@ci.tigard.or.us _ community by developing a Downtown Phone: 503-718-2435 Improvement Plan that will: ■ improve the Downtown core area, ■ create long-lasting benefits for all of Tigard, 6, re ■ achieve the community's vision, and be cost-conscious. LIBERTY PARK Join us as we develop a Downtown Improvement Take the First Step... Plan that is realistic and addresses funding for join us as we plan for Downtown's Future. future improvements.Together, we can plan for a Northern Gateway into Downtown Tigard future that inspires Tigard by investing in our community, our home. . • Printing donated by B&B Print Source . Services donated by Smart Marketing . EXPLORE YOUR DOWNTOWN For the Heart of Tigard Every city has a heart, a place that reflects its true community Facts spirit-Downtown. As we step about Downtown into the future, it's time to strengthen this special place for Commuter rail is Tigard, keeping it strong for coming in 2007 generations to come. Downtown Let's Plan Together! have a station We need you-we can only do Past Am and PM this with all of Tigard's citizens t. k Office service and our Downtown partners! Chamber, Will link Wilsonville to Together with the Downtown I + • Task Force, we will develop a .Future Slte of Commuter Light Rail Tigard Downtown Improvement Rall StatlOn Tigard Transit Plan from September 2004 - June In 's 2005 using a state Transportation Center Downtown 146 acres... and Growth Management (TGM) ` grant. - There are over 150 registered businesses, hat is an Improvement 11/F&R' W Plan? ~ with 800+ The plan will build upon what is " employees, Downtown today by proposing and more than improvements based on answers800 residents. to these questions: What' happens in Downtown today, The Fanno Creek Where does it happen, How do v we want to use this special place z, GreenwayTrail is Future Slte of part of a 15-mile in the future, and How we can Skate Park regional trail that make that happen? - links five cities. City Hall allce Together, we'll explore these questions - come join us and New Library add your voice! , y $~.xX~ w Y ~ ~ x y1f CIO it M 91 IN Rom r x. { r'y f' E n 1 <.w r ( ~r n r. L ^ S 1, y " s Ea S ~ 2 _r j v' 3 t$ \A_ t, 40 1,~ f / • b ~4.cPf9^<~'° t . Y' espy, All ' y a~J" P <"~g 8 V d `k' *y~x,, .b i` w, .at pl4y,. M`s. A n 'arn k 4b q g M t/ 15~0\ l~°~ ~ ✓`"a ~ ~~"Ji+ .1 f 'vd Yf~toxl 0./v. s PN t~./ tr f a q ry ~ ,44 Ar.R ,r ` q y . °G ~ . ~ ,~4.~`~% 1 amp t 0 »'"""444yyybbbSS9,,,,,, M I K, 0 , (7- Z5 9 f Rk;-'.>dI"w+ENOAL RE aM4::, °i'"dM. CWFWE-. MAW Sl°trEFi F CIVIC, ! Fl-f'-.:.N; C':DIU DENSITY HN;"H D&"NS11'Y EMPLOYME'N'T RE^~° AU_ EPL'Tf^R$.d:7`9'ffAE9" I RETAIL. .3/islo5 The Downtown Improvement Plan; Tigard 's ■ Led by Citizen Task F Downtown Task Force dedicated hundreds of hours Update ■ Our Community's Plan; City Council Joint Meeting over 40 outreach events March 15, 2005 ■ For the "Heart" of Tigard ■ Implementation - Make it Happen! Plan Status Design Process ■ Community-Driven: Survey, fall ■ Completion by July 1, 2005 ■ Refining Design Right Now Dialogs (26), Dec. Workshop, Task . 20 Community Dialogs in March Force ■ Working Groups: Implementation ■ Comments = 6 "Great Ideas" . Finance, Catalyst, Brand Tigard ■ Consultants translate "Great . How Do We Make the Plan Happen? Ideas" into map, projects, 7 Districts . Recommendations March 31 ■ Check back with Community (March dialogs); Open House April 23 Design: "Great Ideas" Districts: 1. Main Street Summary ■ Preserve, enhance historical ■ Vibrant Village; retain Main Street character historical feel ■ The "Green Heart" of Tigard; Projects' Environment, Fanno Creek, Trees 4 Focus on pedestrian environment, Fanno Creek, gateways, beautification, ■ Welcoming, Safe for Walking; Burnham Accessible for Cars, Bikes, Transit Options ■ Live, work, play and shop here 1 2. Entertainment 3. Commercial Street ■ Geographic Center ■ Mixed uses, including ■ Focus on arts, gathering affordable space housing and commercial Projects: Projects: 4 Focus on pedestrian environment, 4 Focus on pedestrian environment, Transit Center, linear park along Fanno Creek, Rail platform, rail, Burnham, residential park and ride, linear park along rail. 4. Regional Retail S. Hillside Residential ■ Visibility, entry point from ■ Boulevard with Mid-Size Housing: 99W with supporting retail Take Advantage of Valley Views to draw people Downtown Projects: Projects: + Focus on residential projects, 4 Focus on medium-size retail, public transportation connections, pedestrian plaza, water features, Transit Center improvements, pocket parks and plazas. residential, street improvements 6. Civic 7. Fanno Creek ■ Concentrate all Civic Uses ■ Condo community adjacent Around Existing Complex and sensitive to Fanno Creek Projects: natural area 4 Focus on possibly moving Post Projects: Office here, Burnham, Fanno Creek, + Focus on pedestrian connections, water features, pedestrian Burnham, Fanno Creek enhancement improvements, other street and access, street connections and improvements. improvements 2 Working Groups Upcoming Events ■ Identify Key Projects, Funding Tools, Begin FY2005-06 ■ March - 20 Community Dialogs 4 Finance ■ March 31 - Task Force meeting -Examine LID, CIP, Grants, Urban (Working Group Recommendations) Renewal ■ April 23 - Open House and r j 4 Brand Tigard Funding Discussion -Small Projects Create Momentum ■ July - Council Reviews Plan Catalyst , . -Major Key Projects to Jump-Start Plan NFAMMkINVOWWRnm NMI. Ph=IL nr.■: 11110 TOOK IIILI 3 AGENDA ITEM # 5 FOR AGENDA OF March 15, 2005 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Proposed Capital Improvement Pro am Projects for FY 2005-06 Vim.., PREPARED BY: A.P. uenas DEPT HEAD OK: A.P. Duenas CITY MGR OK: ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Presentation to Council of the current FY 2005-06 draft project list for discussion, input, revisions and suggestions for additional projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That Council review and discuss the draft project list, provide input on the existing list and on any suggested additional projects, and provide any other direction necessary for staff to finalize the project list for submittal through the City's budget formulation process. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) formulation process for FY 2005-06 began in November 2004 with a CIP overview at the Focus on Tigard program, and will be completed when City Council approves the CIP budget and project list for implementation beginning July 1, 2005. A Citywide meeting was conducted on January 19, 2005 to receive input from the public on the draft list of projects, which was posted on the City's website for over three weeks prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission was given the opportunity for input on February 7, 2005. The next step in the process is to obtain City Council input prior to finalization of the list for submission through the City's formal budget process. The need to ensure that funding is provided for Tigard Downtown Improvement Projects was emphasized at the Planning Commission meeting. At this point, the Downtown Improvement Plan Study has not identified specific projects beyond the need to improve Burnham Street. A project has been added to the FY 2005-06 CIP for implementation of specific projects that would be identified through the study during the next two to three months. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY The projects in the FY 2005-06 CIP all promote the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow goals in Growth and Growth Management, Transportation and Traffic, Urban and Public Services and Community Character and Quality of Life. ATTACHMENT LIST 1. Draft List of Proposed Projects for FY 2005-06 2. Executive Summary of the Public Input and Staff Responses on the Draft FY 2005-06 CIP Project List FISCAL NOTES None at this point. hen0\gus%council agenda summaries\3-75-05 cip projects for y 2005.08 ais.doc City of Tigard Page 1 of 7 Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year' FY 2005-06 3/1/2005 4:39:13 PM Street System Program $5,019,725 72nd Avenue/ Dartmouth Street Intersection $500,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $258,636 status: Proposed Traffic Impact Fee Fund $241,364 description: The intersection of 72nd Avenue and Dartmouth, which is currently controlled by a four-way stop, is one of the most heavily-traveled intersections in Tigard. 72nd Avenue shows significant delay both northbound and southbound in the PM peak. In addition, the traffic volumes would most likely increase as large vacant properties in Tigard Triangle are developed. Increased traffic volumes would make the intersection unsafe and more difficult for orderly movement of traffic. This project installs a traffic signal and constructs necessary improvements to the streets at the intersection to improve the traffic handling capacity of the intersection. Funds have been collected from developers in the amount of $108,636 for improvements to the intersection. The intention at this time is to form a reimbursement district to allocate the project costs among upcoming developments. The amount of $391,364 will be contributed by the City for completion of the improvements, which would be fully or partially reimbursed by the developments as they occur within the proposed district. Bull Mountain/Roshak Road Intersection $100,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Traffic Impact Fee Fund - $100,000 status: Proposed Urban Services description: This project widens Bull Mountain road at Roshak Road to provide safe turning movements for vehicular traffic and to accommodate additional traffic volumes generated by new subdivisions north and northwest of the intersection. Also included in the project is minor drainage work to allow widening of the intersection. Some land acquisition required for the widening has been purchased by a developer. This project is funded by the Urban Services TIF Fund for implementation in FY 2004-05. In addition, a developer is providing $35,000 for a half-street improvement required for the development at the northeast corner of the intersection. Construction is expected to begin in late-spring 2005 and should be completed in mid-summer 2005. Burnham Street - Design & Right-of-Way $300,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $300,000 status: Proposed description: This project is to complete the design of Burnham Street between Main Street and Hall Boulevard. Based on current design standards, the street requires reconstruction and widening to the minimum paved width of 44 feet specified for a collector with bike lanes, sidewalks and landscaped strips on each side of the street. However, the elements proposed for the street may be modified to incorporate the recommendations of the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan, which is currently underway. Those recommendations are expected to be provided in the spring of 2005. The project design incorporating those recommendations is expected to begin in late spring 2005 and would continue to FY 2005-06. Commercial Street Sidewalk (Lincoln to Main St) $250,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $250,000 status: Proposed description: This project involves construction of a half-street improvement with sidewalk on the east side of http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 2 of 7 the street. It also widens and realigns the street underneath the 99W over-crossing to provide space for installation of the sidewalk. The total paved width of Commercial Street after improvement would be 28 feet curb-to-curb. The close proximity of existing homes and the bridge piers of the Highway 99W overpass precludes the placement of a planter strip along the street segment. In addition, the amount of right-of-way that can be acquired from Portland & Western Railroad and Union Pacific Railroad is limited due to setback requirements by the companies. A chain link fence will be constructed adjacent to the tracks to prevent pedestrians from crossing the tracks. Completion of the project would provide a safe and convenient pedestrian route to downtown Tigard and the proposed commuter rail station. This project has been approved for CDBG funding in the amount of $91,300. The City provides local matching funds in the amount $158,700 from the Gas Tax Fund. Downtown Improvements $150,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $150,000 status: Proposed description: This project constructs miscellaneous projects recommended by the Downtown Improvement Plan which is scheduled to be finalized by the end of 2005. Projects selected for the construction will be limited to the total cost of $150,000. Durham Road/108th Avenue Intersection Signalization $200,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Traffic Impact Fee Fund $200,000 status: Proposed description: Traffic south of Durham Road attempting to turn left from 108th Avenue onto Durham Road experiences excessive delay. Whenever the gaps in the traffic flow are infrequent, the left-turn movement becomes highly difficult and is often unsafe. The problem will become worse as the residential developments along 108th south of Durham are completed and generate an increase in traffic volumes at this intersection. This project installs a traffic signal on Durham Road at 108th Avenue to provide safe and controlled turning movements at the intersection. Greenburg Road - Design & Right of Way $660,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Traffic Impact Fee Fund $660,000 status: Proposed description: The project was funded in FY 2004-05 through Priorities 2000 & 2002 MTIP funds in the amount of $660,000 with Tigard providing $85,000 in matching funds. The project scope is to improve Greenburg Road from Washington Square Drive to Tiedeman Avenue. However, the bulk of the work will be to widen Greenburg Road between the Highway 217 overcrossing and Tiedeman Avenue to a 5-lane facility. The completed improvements would enhance movement into and out of the Washington Square Regional Center. An engineering consultant has been selected to perform the engineering design and right-of-way acquisition for the project. Additional funding in the amount of $450,000 will be proposed for FY 2005-06 for right-of-way acquisition. This project has been submitted for construction funding of $1,000,000 under the MTIP Priorities 2006-09 project selection process and for $2,100,000 under the County's MSTIP 2007-12 Transportation Capital Program. Greenburg Road/Highway 99W Intersection - Feasibility Study $40,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $40,000 status: Proposed description: Greenburg Road is a north-south Arterial providing direct access to Highway 217 & the Washington Square Regional Center to the north and Highway 99W to the south. Greenburg Road terminates at the highway as it becomes Main Street, a storefront street through downtown Tigard. The current level of service on Greenburg Road at Highway 99W is extremely poor http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 3 of 7 especially in the PM peak hours when vehicles waiting through multiple traffic cycles to clear the intersection. In addition, forecasts for Highway 99W shows it is well over capacity in future demand, which makes the intersection nearly un-mitigatable due to heavy through traffic and conflicts with turning vehicles. The Tigard Transportation System Plan adopted by the City in 2002 identifies existing and future transportation conditions along Highway 99W and recommends several approaches to alleviate traffic congestion. One of the approaches is to implement access management which means closing driveways and limiting access to the highway. This proposed project provides funding for a feasibility study, which includes an alternatives analysis, to determine what alternative works best to alleviate congestion at the Greenburg Road and Highway 99W intersection and possibly improve traffic flow on Highway 99W through that area. One option is to widen Greenburg Road at its approach to Highway 99W. Another option is to eliminate the through movement from Greenburg Road to Main Street and divert downtown traffic through either 95th Avenue or 98th Avenue to Commercial Street. The intent of that study is to determine the best alternative, evaluate that alternative in detail, then scope out a project that implements that alternative for design and construction. Hall Blvd/Wall Street Intersection - Phase 2 $500,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Traffic Impact Fee Fund $500,000 status: Proposed description: This project is carried over from FY 2004-05. The project widens Hall Boulevard along the Library and the Fanno Pointe Condominiums frontages and constructs the first 425 feet of Wall Street to provide a common access to Hall Boulevard for the two developments. To ensure that the intersection would be designed and constructed expeditiously, the project was divided into two phases: Phase 1 is the half-street improvement of Hall Boulevard which has been completed. Phase 2 is the realignment of Pinebrook Creek, the installation of a traffic signal and the construction of 425 feet of Wall Street at the intersection with Hall Boulevard. Construction of this phase begins in the spring and scheduled to be completed in late summer 2005. Hall Boulevard (at McDonald St) - Design & Right-of-Way $25,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Traffic Impact Fee Fund $25,000 status: Proposed description: This project was funded in FY 2004-05. The first phase of this project is the design and acquisition of right-of-way for construction of a southbound right-turn lane on Hall Boulevard at McDonald Street. In addition to widening the street, curb and sidewalk are proposed along the new segment of street to improve pedestrian safety. An ODOT permit will be required for the design and construction of the project. A traffic study will be conducted to identify required design elements that need to be incorporated into the project. Construction of the project is tentatively scheduled for FY 2006-07. Hall Boulevard @ Fanno Creek Crosswalk Light $65,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $65,000 status: Proposed description: This project was funded in FY 2004-05 and is the installation of a marked mid-block crosswalk on Hall Blvd to provide a safe crossing point for Fanno Creek trail users. A traffic study will need to be conducted for compliance with ODOT's design requirements for a mid-block crossing. Completion of the crosswalk will provide a connection between the existing Fanno Creek trail west of Hall Blvd and a proposed trail beginning from the street to the new library. Hall Boulevard Sidewalk (Spruce St to 800' south) $166,725 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $166,725 status: Proposed description: This project would enhance pedestrian movements along Hall Blvd by installing sidewalks within http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 4 of 7 existing gaps on the west side of the street. The close proximity of existing homes and limited right-of-way on this state route preclude placement of planter strips between the proposed sidewalk and street. This project has been approved for CDBG funding in the amount of $136,725 with local matching funds of $30,000 coming from the Gas Tax Fund. Highway 99W Corridor Improvements Study $125,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $125,000 status: Proposed description: Highway 99W carries over 50,000 vehicles per day, half of which is regional through traffic. This highway is currently overwhelmed by the existing traffic volumes. There are no significant parallel routes to this highway, and the traffic congestion will continue to worsen as traffic increases during the next few years. The intersections of Highway 99W with Hall Boulevard, Greenburg Road, and McDonald Street are bottlenecks that seriously hamper the smooth flow of traffic. At peak travel hours, cut-through traffic uses the City of Tigard's collector and arterial system to avoid the Highway 99W traffic congestion. This traffic adversely impacts the arterial and collector street system in the City. This project provides funding for a study to evaluate various alternatives for improvement of the highway (including development of new parallel routes and connections that can feasibly be made between developments parallel to the highway) between Durham Road and Interstate 5. The intent of the study is to address current traffic deficiencies, present design alternatives and propose strategies that would provide for effective traffic circulation, connectivity and operational improvements to the highway and its corridor. The findings of this study would be used to prepare a package of projects (both large and small) that can be implemented over a period of years as funding sources are identified and designated for these projects. McDonald Street (at Hwy 99W) $180,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Traffic Impact Fee Fund $180,000 status: Proposed description: This project adds capacity and enhances traffic flow at the intersection of McDonald Street and Highway 99W. It re-stripes McDonald Street at the intersection to provide a westbound right-turn lane into the state highway and to lengthen the left-turn stacking capacity on McDonald Street. In addition, the project widens the street immediately east of the right-turn lane to provide a transition between the lane and the existing edge of pavement. Improvements to the storm drainage system and modification of the existing signal at the intersection will also be done to conform to ODOT design requirements. The street cross-section of McDonald Street at the intersection after the improvement will have dedicated left-turn, through, and right-turn lanes at that intersection plus extension of the bike lanes. Sidewalk installation is not included in the project since the primary scope of work is to add a turn lane within the existing paved width of the street. North Dakota Street Pedestrian Bridge Conceptual Study $25,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $25,000 status: Proposed description: The North Dakota Street bridge is too narrow to safely pass pedestrian and vehicular traffic simultaneously. This project provides funding for preparation of a Conceptual study and preliminary design to possibly construct an 8-foot wide by approximately 50-foot long pre- fabricated timber pedestrian bridge adjacent to the existing bridge. Also included in the project is the construction of roadway approaches to connect the new bridge with nearby existing sidewalks. Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PMMP) $635,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Street Maintenance Fee $635,000 status: Proposed (SMF) http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 5 of 7 description: The Pavement Major Maintenance Program is an annual long-term street preventative and corrective maintenance program that the City utilizes to extend pavement life and avoid much more costly reconstruction. The Street Maintenance Fee revenue funds projects in this program. The City has applied a variety of minor and major maintenance techniques that include pothole repair, crack-seal treatment, slurry seal, and hot-mix overlay or inlay. The program also includes assessment of types, severity and extent of pavement distress, traffic volumes and environmental conditions prior to identifying appropriate treatments for the streets. Streets scheduled to be included in the FY2005-06 PMMP program are: - Greenburg Road (North Dakota to Center Street) - Highland Drive (109th Ave to 1000' east) - Marion Street. (124th to 121st Ave) - James Street (124th to 121st Ave) - Alberta Street (end of street to 121st Ave) - 124th Street (Marion to James Street) - Spruce Street (89th Ave to Hall Blvd) - 89th Ave (south of Spruce Street) - Thorn Street (east of 89th Ave) - 66th Avenue (south of Taylors Ferry Rd) - 109th Avenue (north of Naeve Street). The project list is subject to change depending upon actual bids received on the projects. The number of projects implemented will be tailored to the funding available. Those street projects that cannot be accommodated within the projected funding would be moved to a subsequent fiscal year. Pine Street $170,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Storm Sewer Fund $70,000 status: Proposed Gas Tax Fund $50,000 Street Maintenance Fee $50,000 (SMF) description: Pine Street is a narrow roadway located in the northeast quadrant of the City. The street has no shoulders, sidewalks and curbs. The pavement surface has extensive longitudinal and transverse pattern cracking and numerous patches along the travel lanes. It also has an inadequate drainage system and two significant curves that limit visibility and speeds. The main goal of this project is to reconstruct the street to provide proper drainage and improve rideability on the street. Ultimate improvements to the street including correction of the existing curves, installation of sidewalks and construction of the street to the ultimate width, will be performed in the future when funding is available. School Zone Signing $5,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $5,000 status: Proposed description: This project would complete the installation of appropriate signs to conform to the new state law, alert drivers on changes of speeds, and to outline the limits of the school zone at each school within the City. Sidewalk Improvements $75,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $75,000 status: Proposed description: This project constructs sidewalks to improve pedestrian safety and access between bus stops and adjacent residential developments. Landscaped strips are not included in the scope of work as the need for the improvement is to fill in gaps between existing sidewalks within limited right-of- way, or to enhance pedestrian access to transit stops. Sidewalks will be installed on Hall Boulevard at Bonita Road and at various locations in the City. Street Striping Program $20,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $20,000 status: Proposed description: http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 6 of 7 This year's program includes placement of permanent or short-term striping on Shady Lane between Greenburg Road and 95th Avenue, Johnson Street between Highway 99W and Grant Street, North Dakota Street from Tiedeman Avenue to 1,500' west, 68th Avenue between Dartmouth Street and Atlanta Street, 69th Avenue between Hampton Street and Dartmouth Street, Boones Ferry Road from 72nd Avenue to I-5 off-ramp, and on various streets located throughout the City. Traffic Calming Program $8,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $8,000 status: Proposed description: The Traffic Calming Program is an annual program that installs traffic calming measures aimed at slowing vehicle speeds within residential neighborhoods. Speed humps have been favored by the majority of residents and have been installed in many cases because they have proven effective in reducing speeds by 4 to 6 mph. Streets are selected for speed humps using the following criteria: traffic speed, volume, number of accidents, existence of sidewalks, cut-through traffic and neighborhood's participation. This year's program includes installation of speed humps on the following streets: - 2 speed humps on O'Mara Street (between Frewing and McDonald Street) - 2 speed humps on 100th Avenue (between Sattler Road to View Terrace). Other streets may be added to the program depending upon neighborhood interest and the street ranking in the speed hump criteria rating system. In consideration of the comments from TVF&R, the speed humps to be installed in the future would be shaped to accommodate emergency vehicles. Wall Street Local Improvement District $40,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Wall Street LID Fund $40,000 status: Proposed description: This project was proposed in FY 2002-03. $300,000 has been allocated since FY 2002-03 for completion of a Preliminary Engineer's Report for construction of Wall Street between Hall Blvd and Hunziker Street. The amount of $40,000 is included in FY 2005-06 for any expenses incurred in the preparation of environmental permit applications and the railroad crossing application and hearing. Any funding for work beyond the Preliminary Engineer's Report and the hearing will be provided primarily through the Local Improvement District, if it is formed. Walnut Street (135th - 121st Ave) $740,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Traffic Impact Fee Fund - $370,000 status: Proposed Urban Services Gas Tax Fund $20,000 Underground Utility Fund $230,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund $80,000 Street Maintenance Fee $40,000 (SMF) description: This project is the last phase of a three-phase project funded through the Washington County MSTIP 3. The first phase is the improvement and signalization of the Walnut/121st Avenue intersection. The second phase is the construction of the Walnut/Gaarde Street intersection, which was performed by the City as part of the Gaarde Street - Phase 1 project. Improvement to Walnut Street between 135th and 121st Avenue will begin in early-Spring 2005 and is scheduled to be completed by July 2006. The City has been working closely with the County on the design of the project and has agreed to reimburse the County for the cost of incorporating in the project such work as undergrounding existing utilities, upgrading the water system, and extending the sanitary sewer mains as these items are not included in the scope of work for the County's MSTIP-3 project. Also included in the project is the resurfacing and widening of Fern Street between 138th and 135th Avenue to accommodate additional traffic anticipated upon closure of Walnut Lane. The Street Maintenance Fee funds will be used for the pavement overlay on Fern Street. The Gas Tax Fund will be used for the widening of Fern Street to provide a pedestrian http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/ 1 /2005 City of Tigard Page 7 of 7 walkway on one side of the street. Walnut/Ash/Scoffins Street Connection Feasiblity Study $40,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Gas Tax Fund $40,000 status: Proposed description: This project is identified by the Tigard Transportation System Plan as an alternate route to Highway 99W for enhancement of intra-city circulation. The TIF Fund provides funding in FY 2004-05 for a corridor study to determine a feasible alignment for the extension of Walnut Street over Fanno Creek to Ash Avenue then north to connect to Hunziker Street. The connection would allow traffic to proceed on Hunziker Street east to the Tigard Triangle without entering Highway 99W. The long-term plan is to route traffic from Hunziker Street over a proposed future Highway 217 overcrossing to connect to Hampton Street. The corridor study was delayed pending recommendations from the Downtown Improvement Plan Study. If the recommendation from that study is to retain the Walnut Street extension as a collector street to make the connection from Highway 99W through downtown Tigard to Hunziker Street, the corridor study would be initiated in the spring of 2005 with selection of a consultant to perform the work. The funding for the project would be continued into FY 2005-06 to complete the study. The study which was funded in FY 2004-05 has been placed on hold awaiting the developement of a Downtown Improvement Plan that will address improvement concepts for transportation system in downtown Tigard. http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 1 of 2 Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year: FY 2005-06 3/1/2005 4:37:40 PM Parks System Program $3,915,541 Fanno Creek Park Outdoor Exercise Trail $15,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $15,000 status: Proposed description: This project constructs an exercise trail made up of various pre-fabricated exercise stations placed along the trail or in one major grouping area. Runners, walkers and bikers may stop and exercise at the various stations. Fanno Creek Trail (gathering place to Wall Street) $85,400 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $85,400 status: Approved description: This is part of the Fanno Creek Trail System. This segment completes the Fanno Creek Park trail across Fanno Creek Park. Fanno Creek Trail (Hall Boulevard to gathering place) $101,486 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $101,486 status: Approved description: This project constructs a Fanno Creek Trail segment east of Hall Boulevard crossing Fanno Creek to the new Library and Wall Street. A pre-fabricated timber bridge will be installed to cross Fanno Creek. Jack Park Install Picnic Shelter and Irrigation $31,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $31,000 status: Adopted description: This project will continue the park master plan with the addition of a picnic shelter and an irrigation system. The irrigation system will improve the fields for use by soccer teams. Northview Park Install Playground & Soccer Facilities $45,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $45,000 status: Proposed description: This project will continue the Park Master Plan by adding a playground and improving the fields for soccer use at Northview Park. Park and Open Space Acquisition & Development $2,355,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $2,355,000 status: Proposed description: The City is responding to the City Council's goal relating to growth in Tigard. Specifically, the goal addresses the identification and purchase of parks and open spaces. NOTE: The City currently has $1,300,000 of SDC funding to accomplish this goal. However, because the City does not have a significant non-SDC revenue source to match these funds, as required, the City may not be able accomplish this goal during the 05/06 fiscal year. Although we will seek grants to accomplish this goal, a non-SDC revenue source is still necessary. http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/project_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 2 of 2 Park Signs $50,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $50,000 status: Proposed description: This project installs community oriented park signs at pedestrian areas and across streets where appropriate at parks and entries to the City. Skateboard Park Development & Construction $405,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $405,000 status: Approved description: This project constructs a 15,000 square foot, in-ground skateboard park inthe area of the City Hall parking lot approved by City Council. Funding for this project will come from private donations, grants, and system development charges. Tree Replacement/ Planting $50,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $50,000 status: Yearly Program description: This continues the yearly program to plant new trees in greenways and parks, remove old and hazardous trees, and maintain and protect existing trees. Funding for this is from the fee developers pay when it is not possible to protect existing trees on property that is being developed. Tualatin River Cook Park Trail from Garden to Bridge $97,530 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $97,530 status: Proposed description: This project connects the existing Cook Park pathway to the proposed Tualatin River pededstian bridge which is scheduled for construction in FY 2005-06. The work includes construction of approximately 10 feet wide by 1350 feet of asphaltic concrete pathway with gravel shoulders. Completion of the project will fill a key gap in the existing riverside trail system and provide community access to the future pedestrian bridge. Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge $250,125 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $250,125 status: Proposed description: This project is to construct the long awaited pedestrian bridge crossing the Tualatin River and linking Tigard to Tualatin and Durham. Washington Square Regional Center Trail $430,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Parks Capital Fund $430,000 status: Proposed description: This is a major MTIP project. The City's share of this project is $44,000. This trail will ultimately provide transportation from the Washington Square area to Tigard. http://www. ci.tigard. or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 1 of 2 Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year: FY 2005-06 3/1/2005 4:38:17 PM Sanitary Sewer System Program $2,310,000 79th Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall $75,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Sanitary Sewer Fund $75,000 status: Proposed description: This project installs approximately 1,000 feet of sanitary sewer pipe between 79th Avenue and the CWS 60-inch interceptor running adjacent to Fanno Creek. Construction of the new pipe is necessary to provide an outfall to a proposed sanitary sewer extension district on 79th Avenue that will serve approximately 18 lots on the street. Benchview Terrace Sanitary Sewer Access Road $40,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Sanitary Sewer Fund $40,000 status: Proposed description: There is an existing maintenance access road for a sewer line that was constructed as a part of the Benchview Estates project. The roadway is accessed from Greenfield Drive, just south of the intersection at Benchview Terrace. Approximately 250 feet of this access roadway has been severely eroded by winter rainfall over the last several years. Construction of the project that includes repair and/or reconstruction of the roadway starts in FY 2004-05 and will be completed in FY 2005-06. Bonita Road at Milton Ct. - Pipe Removal $30,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Sanitary Sewer Fund $30,000 status: Proposed description: In FY 2002-03, the City installed approximately 250 feet of 8-inch sanitary sewer pipe to replace an existing pipe that had servere bellying and poor grade. This segment of line is located at Fanno Creek crossing west of the Bonita Road/Milton Court intersection. At the time of construction, the City decided to abandon the existing pipe in place with the intention of removing it at a later time. This project is the removal of that pipe crossing Fanno Creek between 2 existing manholes located immediately west of the Bonita Road/Milton Court intersection. Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension Program $2,000,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Sanitary Sewer Fund $2,000,000 status: Proposed description: The Citywide Sewer Extension Program is a 5-year program to extend sewers to all developed but unserved residential areas Citywide. The City uses the formation of reimbursement districts to construct the sewers. FY 2004-05 (the 3rd year of the program) includes six reimbursement districts to provide approximately 200 connections to existing homes. The program for FY 2005- 06 (4th year of the program) includes the following proposed six districts: 100th Avenue (between Inez and McDonald Street), Fairhaven Street (east of 115th Avenue), 97th Avenue (between Murdock and Pembrook Street) Hillview Street (at 102nd Avenue), Ash Avenue (east of Garrett Street) and 93rd Avenue (south of McDonald Street). The districts will provide approximately ill connections to existing homes. The Commercial Area Sewer Extension Program is also funded from the Sanitary Sewer Fund and offers commercial entities the opportunity to participate in reimbursement districts for extension of sewer service to commercial areas. The current incentive programs for early connection in residential neighborhoods are not offered to the commercial sector. Funding is provided to accommodate potential projects that may surface during the fiscal year from the commercial sector. http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_projects/project_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 2 of 2 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program $75,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Sanitary Sewer Fund $75,000 status: Proposed description: The Sanitary Sewer Fund will be used to contract out sewer repair projects that are beyond the repair capabilities of the City's Public Works Department. This program is expected to be a continuing program in future years as routine maintenance would avoid restoration costs that could be several times higher. The Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program in FY 2005-06 will include sewer repair projects located at various locations in the City. Sanitary Sewer Master Plan $40,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Sanitary Sewer Fund $40,000 status: Proposed description: CWS is currently updating the 2000 Sewer Master Plan Update to include planning for urban reserve areas. A proposal to add additional planning for the City is being requested including: - Flow monitoring of lines identified by the 2000 Sewer Master Plan Update as having inadequate capacity, -Identifying collection system rehabilitation needs, -Preparing a capital improvement plan. Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Program $50,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Sanitary Sewer Fund $50,000 status: Proposed description: This project rehabilitates sanitary sewer pipes located throughout the City utilizing a trenchless construction method to prevent damage to existing pavement and eliminate conflicts with existing utilities. Construction of the project will be combined with a storm drainage rehabilitation project to generate larger quantities that typically would result in lower bids. http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 1 of 3 Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year: FY 2005-06 3/1/2005 4:38:45 PM Storm Drainage System Program $744,000 79th Avenue Storm Drainage Outfall $90,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Storm Sewer Fund $90,000 status: Proposed description: This project constructs approximately 1,000 feet of 18-inch storm drain line east of 79th Avenue for discharge of storm runoff to Fanno Creek. The project also installs an energy disipator manhole and riprap for water to flow through prior to discharging to the creek. Construction of this project will be combined with the 79th Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall project to minimize impacts to private properties. A 20-foot utility easement will be dedicated by a property owner for construction and maintenance of the storm drain and sanitary sewer pipes . Completion of this project will provide a direct point of connection for future upgrades of the storm drainage system on the street. Clean Water Services Master Plan Projects $150,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Quality/Quantity $150,000 status: Adopted Fund description: The Fanno Creek Watershed Plan provides the plan for the Tigard area. The beneficial uses the plan is expected to protect include: the survival of resident fish an aquatic life, salmonid spawning and rearing, water-contact recreation, aesthetics, fishing, and water supply. The plan accomplishes this by identifying prioritized projects and other management actions that will improve water quality and flood management. In addition, the Healthy Streams Plan is expected to be completed during February 2005. This plan will include projects to treat stormwater, replace culverts that are barriers to fish migration and plant trees to shade creeks. Derry Dell Creek Wetland & Vegetated Corridor Monitoring $2,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Storm Sewer Fund $2,000 status: Proposed description: In FY 2004-05, the City enhanced wetland areas and the vegetated corridor along Derry Dell Creek at 110th Avenue. The enhancement is required by the DSL, the Corps of Engineers, and CWS due to impacts generated by the installation of a sanitary sewer pipe across the creek. Intallation of planting materials has been completed. This project involves field inspections and preparation of the first-year monitoring report for submittal to the agencies. Durham Rd at 108th Ave - Stream Bank Stabilization $100,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Storm Sewer Fund $100,000 status: Proposed description: A creek bank and a portion of the segmental-block retaining wall south of Durham Road have been eroded and undermined due to high stream flow oufalling from a 36-inch culvert under the street. The contributing factors to the problems are a large boulder which was placed in the middle of the stream and the culvert alignment which does not line up with the creek. This project removes and reconstructs a portion of the retaining wall, removes the existing boulder, and extends the culvert for proper alignment with the creek. Bank stabilization immediately south of the outfall is currently being performed by a developer under a private project. The project site is located within a sensitive area according to the City's Wetlands and Stream Corridors map, which will require environmental studies and permits. http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 2 of 3 Gaarde Street Phase 2 - Wetland Mitigation $2,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Storm Sewer Fund $2,000 status: Proposed description: This project provides mitigation measures that were required by the DSL, the Corps of Engineers and CWS to offset the loss of 0.009 acres of wetland associated with the widening of Gaarde Street. The offsite mitigation area is along the Fanno Creek Greenway immediately north of Tigard Street. The vegetated enhancement area is located along the Fanno Creek trail south of the Burnham Business Park. Initial vegetation management and plant installation were completed in 2004. This project is the monitoring and preparation of a wetland report for submittal to the agencies. Highland Drive (109th Ave to 1100' east) - Storm Drain Pipe Replacement $150,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Storm Sewer Fund $150,000 status: Proposed description: The existing storm drainage system on Highland Drive from 109th Ave to approximately 1,100 feet east of the Highland/109th intersection consists of 12-inch pipes that have been crushed in numerous places and are beginning to fail. This project includes installation of new pipes, manholes and upgraded catch basins. Construction of the project will be combined with the Pavement Major Maintenance Program, which is scheduled for the summer of 2005. Construction coordination would be more efficient if both projects are handled simultaneously by the same contractor. Riparian Restoration and Enhancement $50,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Quality/Quantity $50,000 status: Proposed Fund description: This project restores and enhances existing riparian areas along Hiteon Creek (Englewood Park), Summer Creek (Summerlake Park), Fanno Creek (Englewood Park) and Fanno Creek (Bonita Park). The scope of work includes removing of non-native plant species, planting native plants, placing soil protection measures, maintenance and monitoring the enhancement work. The project is scheduled to be continued over a period of 5 years beginning FY 2005-06. Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitaion $60,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Storm Sewer Fund $60,000 status: Proposed description: The City of Tigard's television inspection reports identify several thousand feet of damaged storm drain pipes. In FY 2001-02, the City established a yearly rehabilitation program to restore the structural integrity of the damaged pipes. The program uses a method to install pipes that eliminates the need to excavate and minimizes disruption to traffic and underground utilities. This project continues the program by rehabilitating approximately 600 feet of pipe through installation of cured-in-place pipe inside the existing pipes utilizing the trenchless construction method. Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program $75,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Storm Sewer Fund $75,000 status: Proposed description: This program addresses minor storm drainage problems requiring more than normal maintenance effort by the City's Public Works department. The Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program in FY 2005-06 includes the following and other projects located at various locations in the City: - Benchview Terrace (between White Cedar and Brim Place) - Catch Basin Installation - 112th http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineer-ing/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/ 1 /2005 City of Tigard Page 3 of 3 Avenue (south of Gaarde Street) - Pipe Extension and Catch Basin Installation Summer Lake Culvert $40,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Storm Sewer Fund $40,000 status: Proposed description: Summer Lake Park is located along Winterlake Drive, near Shore Drive. There is an existing pedestrian pathway system that leads from the parking area into the park and also to a separate area of the park. A natural stream crosses this area from Winterlake Drive to Summer Lake. Where the pathway crosses this stream, three 12-inch culverts were installed. However, these culverts are not sized large enough to handle the winter runoff. This project replaces these culverts with a single large culvert and raises the pathway to accomodate the larger diameter of the new culvert. The project begins in FY 2004-05 with submittals of permit applications to DSL and the Corps of Engineers. Construction of the project is scheduled for the summer of 2005. Water Quality Enhancement $25,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Quality/Quantity $25,000 status: Proposed Fund description: This project converts the existing water quality pond to a new Swale, or extended dry pond, on Steve Street west of 81st Avenue. Also included in the project is the enhancement of the water quality facility on Greensward Lane between 88th Avenue and Hall Boulevard by planting the facility with native grasses, trees and shrubs, and installation of a temporary irrigation system. 0 http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_projects/project_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 1 of 2 Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year: FY 2005-06 3/1/2005 4:42:47 PM City Facilities System Program $1,265,425 IT Building Generator Upgrades $76,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Facility Fund $76,000 status: Proposed description: This project will upgrade the current generators at the IT building to handle the necessary capacity. This facility has recently experienced power failures and the computer power is a critical resource for the City. Library Parking Lot Expansion $125,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Facility Fund $125,000 status: Proposed description: The library parking lot is almost always full, especially during events that draw a crowd to the library. This project expands the existing parking lot to provide additional parking spaces for library patrons. The expansion of the parking lot is contingent upon the construction of Wall Street from its intersection with Hall Boulevard to a point 425 feet east of the intersection. The main entry to the library will be relocated to line up with the book return and the existing driveway will be removed. The area for expansion is between the existing parking lot and the northerly right-of-way of Wall Street. Included in the construction are minor reconfiguration of the existing parking lot, installation of parking lot lights, landscaping, and retaining walls if necessary. Library Site Arsenic Removal $75,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Facility Fund $75,000 status: Proposed description: Soil contaminated with arsenic had been removed prior to construction of the library and Hall Boulevard half-street improvement. This project provides funding for additional soil samplings to determine if arsenic levels in the vicinity of the library fall below the background levels required DEQ. Additional soil clean up may be required as a result of the samplings. PD Underground Storage Tank Upgrade $20,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Facility Fund $20,000 status: Proposed description: Decomission and remove existing underground storage tank for the emergency back up generator at the Police Department. Install above ground storage tank of same capacity (500 gallons). Police & Records Storage Remodel $149,425 cip year: FY 2005-06 Facility Fund $149,425 status: Proposed description: The project is to remodel the current Public Works operations building to accommodate storage of Police evidence and city records. The remodel includes architect fees, construction costs including modifications to plumbing, electrical and heating systems, purchase of a generator and above ground tank, man lift and shelving units for storage. By remodeling the operations facility, Police and City records will be able to store records and evidence in one location consequently http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 2 of 2 reducing overall operating costs and working more efficiently. Senior Center Seismic Upgrade Design $20,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Facility Fund $20,000 status: Proposed description: Engineering services to provide plans, specs. and inspections in preparation for the Senior Center Seismic Upgrade, scheduled for FY 06/07. Water Building Remodel $800,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Facility Fund $800,000 status: Proposed description: This project remodels the Water Building to consolidate the Public Works Department staff and crews in one building. Public Works will move from the Ash Street offices to the Water Building after the remodel is completed. http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 1 of 5 Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year: FY 2005-06 3/1/2005 4:41:09 PM Water System Program $4,450,743 550' Zone Beaverton Connector $200,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $84,000 status: Proposed Water SDC Fund $116,000 description: The City's water system is currently connected with the City of Beaverton (Joint Water Commission) in our 425' elevation zone. This project will create a second connection to serve our 550' elevation zone. This project will also allow us to postpone the construction of one 550' elevation reservoir for an indefinite time, thus postponing the expense of about $4,000,000. 550' Zone Improvements: 10 MG transfer pump station upgrade $200,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water CIP Fund $200,000 status: Proposed description: The existing transfer pump station, located on the 10 MG reservoir site at Bull Mountain Road/125th Avenue, serves both the 550-foot and 713-foot service zones. The Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study identified a need to replace this pump station with one that would provide a higher pumping capacity to both service zones. Construction of this improvement increases pumping capacity from 2,000 gpm to 3,300 gpm for the 713-foot service zone. The pump station will also provide 3,900 gpm to the 550-Foot Zone Reservoir No. 2 listed previously. Along with the piping improvements listed below, the existing pump station at the Canterbury site (Pump Station No. 1) will be abandoned. 550' Zone Improvements: reservoir #2 construction $600,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water CIP Fund $600,000 status: Proposed description: This reservoir is proposed to be located on the Tigard Tualatin School District (TTSD) site for the Alberta Rider Elementary School. Constructing this reservoir will eliminate some of the demand currently supplied by the 713-Foot pressure zone. Supply to the reservoir will be provided through the transfer pump station upgrade and transmission piping projects separately listed. ASR #3 (Production) $1,090,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water CIP Fund $1,090,000 status: Proposed description: The City completed an ASR expansion study which indicated that the City could achieve a total of 5 to 6 MGD from ASR wells placed around the City's aquifer. ASR provides the ability to inject water during the winter months in the aquifer (when water is plentiful), store the water in the aquifer for a few months, and then withdraw that same water in the summer months to help manage higher water demands. The ASR program may include the drilling of a test well first to indicate the suitability of the well for ASR use. If the test well is deemed appropriate for ASR use, a larger well will be drilled for a production well. The production well project would include the design and construction of the well pump, pump house and necessary water line piping to connect the well to the City's water system. ASR #4 (Test) $92,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water,CIP Fund $92,000 status: Proposed http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/ 1 /2005 City of Tigard Page 2 of 5 description: The City completed an ASR expansion study which indicated that the City could achieve a total of 5 to 6 MGD from ASR wells placed around the City's aquifer. ASR provides the ability to inject water during the winter months in the aquifer (when water is plentiful), store the water in the aquifer for a few months, and then withdraw that same water in the summer months to help manage higher water demands. The ASR program may include the drilling of a test well first to indicate the suitability of the well for ASR use. If the test well is deemed appropriate for ASR use, a larger well will be drilled for a production well. The production well project would include the design and construction of the well pump, pump house and necessary water line piping to connect the well to the City's water system. ASR Expansion Consulting Services $15,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water CIP Fund $15,000 status: Proposed description: For siting studies and evaluation of additional ASR well development projects. Defective Meter Replacements (1 1/2-Inch & Larger) $40,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $40,000 status: Proposed description: This has been one of the long-term projects for the Public Works Department. The large meter replacement program is for the systematic testing, repair and/or replacement of all 1 1/2-inch and larger water meters. Meters of this size have developed problems where actual water flows are inaccurately measured; most of the time, the volume of water is under-reported. The result is that water customers could be using more water than they are being assessed. Testing and or replacement of these water meters have proven to make financial sense in that the investment is recouped by the additional revenues received due to accurate meters. Defective Meter Replacements (Smaller Sizes) $15,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $15,000 status: Proposed description: This has been another one of the long-term projects for the Public Works Department and is similar to the program for 1 1/2-inch meter replacements. But this program is for the smaller meters. Meters of this size have also developed problems where actual water flows are inaccurately measured; most of the time, the volume of water is under-reported. The result is that water customers could be using more water than they are being assessed. Testing and or replacement of these water meters have proven to make financial sense in that the investment is recouped by the additional revenues received due to accurate meters. JWC Raw Water Pipeline Pre-design $82,503 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water CIP Fund $82,503 status: Proposed description: This project will include a pipe connection between the JWC treatment plant and the headwork at Scoggins Dam. At present, water from Hagg Lake makes its way to the treatment plant via an open channel waterway and the Tualatin River. There are two problems with the existing system. First, the JWC treatment plant must submit a request to the Scoggins Dam control authority to release more water into the open channel system as the demand rises. But the treatment plant can only handle a certain volume of water at the intake; any extra water bypasses the plant and continues down the river. Therefore, there is a loss in efficiency. Second, it is estimated that 20% of the water from Scoggins Dam is lost to evaporation prior to reaching the treatment plant. This raw water pipeline will allow the JWC to control how much water is released from the dam into the pipe so that only the flow rate needed by the treatment plant will be released. In addition, http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_projects/project_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 3 of 5 the pipeline will eliminate the water loss due to evaporation and will provide more capacity to the JWC system. Menlor Reservoir Recirculation $45,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $45,000 status: Proposed description: Menlor reservoir is developing a water quality issue in that, at certain times of the year, water does not circulate throught the reservoir thus allowing chlorine residuals to diminish to below state standards. This project will install a small circulatory pump system that will address this problem. Meter Installations $60,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $60,000 status: Proposed description: This on-going program ties in with the Water Service Installations program. When new water customers, or existing customers who need an additional water service, apply for a new service, Public Works staff install the service line and will set the new meter. Replace Well House #2 (Gaarde Site) $35,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $35,000 status: Proposed description: The existing well house at Well #2 is approximately 40 years old and needs to be replaced and upgraded for security reasons. Sain Creek Tunnel Study: JWC Joint Project $21,500 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water CIP Fund $21,500 status: Proposed description: The Tualatin Basin Water Supply Feasibility Study (WSFS) outlined a number of projects that could be constructed to increase the water supply capacity for Cities in Washington County. The Sain Creek Tunnel project is on the that could be constructed in conjunction with the proposed Scoggins Dam raise at Henry Hagg Lake. The tunnel would be constructed from the Tualatin River to the mouth of Sain Creek at Hagg Lake, covering a distance of approximately three miles through the coast range. The tunnel would take water from the Tualatin River during the heavy winter rains and divert it to Hagg Lake. It is estimated that the tunnel will help fill Hagg Lake if the dam were raised, and would effectively increase the watershed by approximately two-thirds. This will help to reduce the number of years that the lake may not fill, thereby increasing the reliability of this source. Scoggins Dam/Tualatin Water Supply $389,490 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water CIP Fund $389,490 status: Proposed description: Secure 550' Reservoir #1 Site $400,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water SDC Fund $400,000 status: Proposed description: This reservoir is shown in the City's Water System Master Plan and will be located on the north side of Bull Mountain. These funds will be used to locate and secure a suitable site. http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_typq_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 4 of 5 Telemetry Upgrade $262,500 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $262,500 status: Proposed description: The existing telemetry system is out of date and the software and hardware are no longer supported by the manufacturer or local representatives. The City has also experienced failures of controllers at various sites due to the aging of the overall system. Replacement of controllers can take up to three weeks, which is not adequate for the City's need to have continuous monitoring ability of the water system. The upgrade process will enable the City to have up to date technology that is more user friendly, and to explore modes of communication other than the phone line system currently used. Walnut Street (121st to Tiedeman) Relocate 12-Inch Line w/Street Construction $116,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $116,000 status: Proposed description: This project is in conjunction with the Walnut Street improvements to be completed by Washington County and the City over the next two years. Due to grade and alignment issues the existing 12" water line needs to be upgraded. Water Line Replacement-Walnut (135th to 121st) $528,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $264,000 status: Proposed Water SDC Fund $264,000 description: This project is in conjunction with the Walnut Street improvments to be jointly completed by Washington County and the City over the next two fiscal years. The "Water Distribution Hydraulic Study - May 2000" recommended that a new 24-inch water line be completed between 121st Avenue and Barrows Road. In addition, a separate 16-inch water line is needed approximately between 132nd Avenue and Walnut Lane. The roadway improvement project makes it timely for the installation of these transmission water lines. The funding of the water improvements will be roughly 50% from the Water Fund and 50% from the Water SDC Fund. Water Main Oversizing $50,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water SDC Fund $50,000 status: Proposed description: During the course of the year the City may find the need to upsize a planned pipeline through a new development, thus accomplishing an identified capital improvement as listed in the "Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study - May 2000." Water Main Replacements $78,750 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $78,750 status: Proposed description: This on-going program is based on the needs identified in the "Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study - May 2000", and is for the routine replacement of leaking, damaged and older water mains throughout the water system. In most cases the existing mains have adequate capacity and will be replaced with the same diameter water mains. This program is also for the completion of loops in the system to maintain hydraulic efficiencies. Water Reservoir Seismic Upgrade Evaluation $70,000 http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 City of Tigard Page 5 of 5 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $70,000 status: Proposed description: This is the beginning of an annual program that will review all of Tigard's water reservoirs for conformity to current seismic standards and recommend upgrades where needed. Water Service Installations $10,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $10,000 status: Proposed description: This is another long-term program for the department. Each year the City adds new customers to the system through individual building permits or additional water services. Customers apply for a new water service, and Public Works staff installs the service line and will set the meter (see Meter Installations line item). Water Site Security Upgrades $50,000 cip year: FY 2005-06 Water Fund $50,000 status: Proposed description: This project will accomplish the water site security upgrades that were identified in the PW Vulnerability Assessment and Emergency Response Plan. The security upgrades will include improvements to such things as access, fencing, intrusion alarms, and monitoring. http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_hall/departments/engineering/cip_proj ects/proj ect_type_repo... 3/1/2005 CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Responses to Public Input on FY 2005-06 Capital Improvement Program March 1, 2005 Executive Summary - FY 2005-06 CIP March 1, 2005 Page 1 of 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) formulation process for Fiscal Year 2005-06 began with an overview of the process presented by the City Engineer on the Focus on Tigard on November 4, 2004. The draft list of potential CIP projects for the fiscal year was posted on the City's webpage on December 28, 2004 and was presented to citizens in a Citywide meeting on January 19, 2005. Prior to the meeting, the program informational flyer was inserted in 5,400 copies of the Tigard Times newspaper on January 13, 2005. In addition, the CIP formulation process was also posted on City of Tigard Events Calendar, Cityscape and bulletin boards in City Hall. A Press Release was also submitted to the Tigard Times on January 7, 2005 for publishing of CIP event schedules and contact information. Citizens have been notified through the City's webpage that they can continue to submit their input for the FY 2005-06 CIP through February 28, 2005. They have also been informed that the proposed CIP list will be discussed with City Council at the March 15, 2005 workshop meeting and that comments received after the deadline will not be in the Council packet. However, projects submitted after the deadline will be considered on a case-by-case basis up till the time the CIP budget is submitted for consideration in the City's formal budget formulation process. Four responses were received by the Engineering Department via postal system and telephone. Five people registered their names on the sign-in sheet for the Citywide meeting on January 19, 2005. Of the five people, two submitted comments in writing while others discussed their comments with staff at the meeting. Of the nine responses, two contain comments that request the City to install a mid-block crosswalk on North Dakota Street at the Fanno Creek Pathway. This project has been included in the FY 2004-05 CIP and is scheduled for construction in early-spring 2005. Other comments provide input on the draft CIP list and nominate projects for consideration. General comments show interest in land acquisition to protect natural resources, expand the City's park system or preserve open space at various locations in the City. In addition to those comments received by the City since the beginning of the CIP formulation process, citizens have also nominated projects for consideration during the past year. Staff has responded directly to citizens at the time each individual request was received and has included those projects in this summary. Included in the summary are the press release, the CIP program informational flyer, as well as letters and e-mails from citizens requesting or opposing improvements. The following is the summary of public comments and staff's responses to those comments, including requests that were submitted prior to the beginning of the CIP formulation process. 1. North Dakota Street Pedestrian Bridge A designated pedestrian and bicycle access across the North Dakota bridge at Fanno Creek was requested by two citizens who indicated North Dakota Street at this location presents a dangerous situation for pedestrians and bicyclists when crossing the bridge. It was also mentioned that a bridge on Tigard Street at the Fanno Creek Trail could serve as an example for the proposed project. Staff Response - The existing 18-foot wide North Dakota bridge that spans approximately 50 ft across Fanno Creek is not wide enough to provide a sidewalk or bike lane on the bridge. Executive Summary - FY 2005-06 CIP March 1, 2005 Page 2 of 9 There are certain physical constraints on both sides of the existing bridge. It may not be feasible to construct a free-standing pedestrian bridge at that location. A Feasibility Study and accompanying Preliminary Design will be included in the proposed FY 2005-06 CIP. If the project is determined to be feasible, it will be a candidate for construction in the following fiscal year. 2. North Dakota Street Pedestrian Crosswalk The comment suggested installation of a mid-block crosswalk connecting the two pathways north and south of North Dakota Street. Staff Response - This project is included in the FY 2004-05 CIP. A marked mid-block crosswalk will be installed in the spring of 2005. Also included in the project are improvements on the north side of the roadway to connect the two paths and provide a paved walking surface for pedestrians. 3. 109th Avenue Improvements The request came from a resident who lives at the corner of 109th Avenue and Naeve Street. The resident while recognizing the existing gravel street been treated with dust abatement by City forces in the last few years, asks the street be improved or repaved. Staff Response - As part of the Major Maintenance Program (PMMP), each year the City selects one or more gravel roads for maintenance using appropriate construction technique for each street. Streets selected for maintenance have to meet certain criteria. For example, Mapleleaf Street between 72„ a and 71St Avenue, which is a short connector, was selected for paving in FY 2004-05 due to its location, traffic volume, speed and surface conditions. 109th Avenue is a gravel road that basically serves two lots and has the lowest traffic volume of all gravel streets remaining in Tigard. Paving the street does not make sense. However, it does present an annual maintenance problem and does need to be addressed. An appropriate treatment can stabilize the surface and reduce the maintenance requirements on that street. It will be included in FY 2005-06 for investigation and implementation of a treatment appropriate for that street. 4. Fanno Creek Trail (Tigard to Tiedeman Avenue) This comment was about a portion of the Fanno Creek trail between Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue having standing water after heavy rain events requiring trail users to walk through existing vegetation adjacent to the path. The comment suggested the trail section be replaced with boardwalk to provide better drainage and allow users to have access to the trail in the winter. Staff Response - The Tigard-Tiedeman trail segment is located adjacent to a wetland area. The FY 2004-05 CIP allocates $10,000 for a preliminary study and design to determine what alternative works best to alleviate the standing water issue. The City plans to complete the Fanno Creek trail system between the boundaries of Tigard and Beaverton and Tualatin. Funding for the trail system is through the Parks Capital fund or grants which are generally limited. The City is trying to complete all the trail segments first and then go back to fine tune sections that have developed problems (i.e. wet trail due to heavy rains or high groundwater table). The City has determined that placing an additional three inches of asphaltic concrete to raise the pavement surface of the trail above the water Executive Summary - FY 2005-06 CIP March 1, 2005 Page 3 of 9 level would be the most cost-effective solution to the problem. This work can be performed this fiscal year using available funds. Additional drain pipes will also be installed to allow water to flow toward the creek. The proposed work is scheduled to be completed by June 2005. 5. Walnut Street/Ash Avenue/Scoffins Street Feasibility Study Two citizens were concerned that the study could lead to a project that would result in increased traffic along the residential portion of Ash Street. Staff Response - The proposed study is expected to establish a feasible corridor for this collector street and will take adverse impacts to the existing neighborhoods into consideration. The process of determining that feasible alignment will include opportunities for the public and the residents in the project vicinity to comment on the proposed project through neighborhood meetings. No construction is currently planned. 6. North Dakota Street Streetlights, Curbs, Sidewalks and Speed Humps The request was for installation of streetlights, curbs and sidewalks, and speed humps on Dakota Street between 95`h and 901h Avenue. Staff Response - Currently, the City doesn't have a program for installing curbs and sidewalks on residential streets in existing subdivisions. City staff will conduct another study in this segment of North Dakota Street to determine if the street would meet all criteria required for installation of speed humps. There are two suitable locations for installing a cobra head-style streetlight. PGE has reviewed the two locations and indicated that the existing power pole at 9155 North Dakota Street is the best location for a streetlight to be installed on for around $450. The City does have a Streetlight Fund, which provides minimal funding for new lights. These available funds should be reserved for installation of streetlights at critical locations on arterial and collector streets. This section of North Dakota Street has been designated as a neighborhood route and would be lower in priority for streetlight installation. There is a process for residents of a neighborhood to pay for installation of streetlights and for the City to assume responsibility for the energy and maintenance charges after completion of installation. This may be an option for this and other neighborhoods in the City. The above response was discussed in a telephone conversation with the resident who submitted the request. 7. Interpretive Signage at Summerlake Park This project was proposed by the Biodiversity Group of Tigard who indicated the group had been working with a former parks director to develop interpretive signage at the park. Signs recommended include informational (i.e. bird species) and warning (i.e. alert park visitors that feeding would be potentially harmful to park animals). Staff Response - Signage is already being addressed by the City's Park Division. Parks staff is currently working with a Boy Scout organization to name the various plants in the Rhododendron garden. The division has also installed signage directing the public not to feed the geese/wildlife and to direct the public as to where they can and cannot fish. Some interpretive signage has been installed at various parks (Fanno Creek Park, Cook Park, Bonita Park and Summerlake Park). Interpretive signage is a continuing project for the Parks Executive Summary - FY 2005-06 CIP March 1, 2005 Page 4 of 9 division. The division has spent up to $5,000 this year in materials and labor installing interpretive signs. Citizens who want to volunteer their help in the installation of interpretive signage can contact the division. 8. Land Acquisition The comment was regarding provision of CIP funds for acquisition of parcels that would complement the parks system in Tigard as well as protect natural resources including large old trees and wildlife. The comment also included an "option to purchase" idea allowing the City to accumulate funding for full purchase of the land in the future. The following four parcels were recommended for acquisition: - Black Bull Development: 8-acre parcel along Fanno Creek north of North Dakota Street. - Stonechase Development: 4.5 acre parcel on North Dakota Street at 112`h Avenue. - Ash Creek and adjoining Gates properties: 9-acre parcel and adjoining parcel by 74`' Avenue and Ventura Street. - Fanno Creek east of the library site. Staff Response - The Parks System Development Charge (SDC) Fund is available for land acquisition and park development projects directly associated with growth. The funds cannot be used for any other purposes. For example, if the City wanted to add playground equipment, or purchase properties adjacent to an existing park not associated with growth, SDC funds could not be used. Another example, let's say the City wanted to buy park land for active use and/or passive parks such as greenways, wetlands, etc., and the purchases were not in response to growth, SDC funds could not be used. If park land and/or greenways, wetlands, etc. were purchased in an area where growth was occurring, e.g. Bull Mountain, up to 100% of the land acquisition cost could be SDC eligible. Purchase of the four recommended parcels is highly unlikely because the properties are being developed. Development status is summarized as follows: - Black Bull Development: Subdivision application was submitted previously which was incomplete. The development just had a pre-application conference for a different project. - Stonechase Development: Subdivision approved, under appeal. - Ash Creek and adjoining Gates property: The Ash Creek Subdivision was remanded from LUBA and is going to Council next week for review. Subdivision of the Gates property is in review. - Fanno Creek east of the new library site: This property belongs to Mr. Fred Fields. The City, at the present time, does not have the funds to purchase this property even if it were available. The School District also owns property east of creek and north of the Fields property. 9. Skate Park Location A person was concerned that the Skate Park, which is designated for construction in the City Hall's parking lot, would be an unsightly complex. Staff Response - The parking lot location was deemed appropriate by the Skate Park Task Force and Council because of its visibility from the street, nearness to the police station, and Executive Summary - FY 2005-06 CIP March 1, 2005 Page 5 of 9 nearness to drinking water fountains and restrooms located in the Police Department entryway. In addition, sitting the Skate Park on land owned by the City should reduce the overall project costs making the project more cost effective and affordable. 10. Spruce Street, 89th Avenue, Thorn Street, 66th Avenue, Upper Boones Ferry Road Paving A comment received by the City in May 2004 requested that Spruce Street (between 89th to Hall Boulevard), 89th Avenue (south of Spruce Street) and Thorn Street (north of Naeve Street) be paved. In June 2004, a different citizen asked for a pavement overlay be applied on 66th Avenue (south of Taylors Ferry Road). In September 2004, the City received a request via telephone to include Upper Booties Ferry Road (between 72"d Avenue and Interstate 5) in the PMMP. Staff Response - Spruce Street, 89th Avenue, Thorn Street and 66th Avenue will be included for paving in the FY 2005-06 PMMP. However, the paving work will only provide a two- lane paved roadway with gravel shoulders as needed to protect the paved surface. Full improvements to the streets are typically done through formation of a local improvement district with the befitted properties paying for the improvements. Due to its current rating, Upper Boones Ferry Road does not qualify for the program in FY 2005-06. However, the street will be monitored periodically by the City for possible inclusion of the street in the maintenance program when required. 11. Highland Drive Overlay In September 2004, a citizen called to request that Highland Drive east of 109th Avenue be re-paved. Staff Response - The existing pavement on Highland Drive from 109th Avenue to 1,000 feet east of the intersection is moderately cracked and shows significant signs of deterioration. The street will be included in the FY 2005-06 PMMP for overlay. This project will be constructed in conjunction with and following completion of a storm drainage project located within the project limits. 12. Pine Street Reconstruction In late-summer 2004, a resident that lived on Pine Street requested that the street be included in the City's Pavement Maintenance Program as soon as possible. Staff Response - The pavement surface on Pine Street east of 69th Avenue has extensive longitudinal and transverse pattern cracking and numerous patches along the travel lanes. The 800-foot deteriorated segment of street that provides access to about 15 residents also has potholes due to frequent traffic movements and insufficient subsurface materials. The street will be proposed in FY 2005-06 for a combination of reconstruction and overlay, where appropriate, on this segment. Ultimate improvements to the street could be performed in the future through formation of a local improvement district. 13.103 d Avenue Sidewalk In April 2004, a community resident called to request a sidewalk along 103rd Avenue between View Terrace and Amanda Court. Executive Summary - FY 2005-06 CIP March 1, 2005 Page 6 of 9 Staff Response - Currently, 103`d Avenue is a narrow street without curbs and sidewalks. Existing trees and vegetation adjacent to the street obstruct the view of motorists creating a hazardous situation for pedestrians walking along the street. Sidewalks are needed at this location, Hall Boulevard, 72°d Avenue and various other locations in the City. However, funding for such projects is extremely limited. The City has applied for and received funding through the Community Development Block Grant program. This area most likely would not qualify for such funding. The declining gas tax revenue remains as the only other viable source for new sidewalk connections. If the desire is to establish a sidewalk improvement program, projects need to be prioritized and a new funding source (or sources) needs to be established and dedicated to that program. Until that happens, this and other sidewalk improvement projects would have to contend with the limited funds. Because of those reasons, this project is not recommended for inclusion in the FY 2005-06 14. Pine Street Storm Drainage Improvements A property owner contacted the City several times regarding improvements to the undersized storm drain pipes on Pine Street that cause flooding to adjacent properties during heavy rains. Staff Response - The inadequate drainage system on Pine Street will be proposed for upgrading for FY 2005-06. Construction of this project would be combined with the Pine Street Reconstruction project to minimize construction impacts to the neighborhood. 15. 69th, 701h Avenue & Lola Lane Storm Drainage A citizen was concerned about a general lack of drainage facilities in the 68th, 70"' Avenue area and about a drainage problem between houses at the Lola Lane cul-de-sac. Staff Response - Drainage facilities in the 68th, 70th Avenue area have been reviewed and a few improvements have been made by the City. The remaining drainage needs are not suitable CIP projects because they are local improvements and are generally the result of a lack of street improvements, which could be done through formation of a local improvement district with the benefited properties paying for the improvements. To resolve the drainage problem between houses at Lola Lane, the City has built a rock-lined ditch to convey runoff between the houses at the Lola Lane cul-de-sac and the sidewalk so that it continues to the street. The remaining needs for an inlet at the end of the ditch and a connection to the street drainage will be installed by the City's Public Works Department by the spring of this year. 16. CIP Process A recent e-mail from a citizen contained several questions about the CIP process. The questions were regarding what options for making comments on proposed CIP projects, how citizens find out how public comments are going to be addressed, if a hearing is going to be conducted by City Council, etc. Staff has responded to the e-mail. A copy of the e-mail addressing each question is attached to this report. 17. Hall Blvd/Wall Street Intersection - Phase 2 On February 15 & 16, 2005, the City received an e-mail and letter from Fans of Fanno Creek opposing the construction of Wall Street. The e-mail and letter indicated that the Wall Street extension would create a negative impact on natural values in the area and that construction Executive Summary - FY 2005-06 CIP March 1, 2005 Page 7 of 9 of 425 feet of Wall Street wouldn't be needed as adequate access has already been provided for the library and Fanno Pointe Condominiums. Fans of Fanno Creek were also concerned about the extension of Walnut/Ash/Scoffins Street that would create another crossing of Fanno Creek. Staff Response - The Wall Street extension is identified in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP) dated January 2002. It is shown in the "Proposed Functional Classification System" map as a proposed collector roadway. There are several goals and policies identified in the TSP that support the need for construction of Wall Street between Hall Blvd and Hunziker Street. The City evaluated nine alternative roadway alignments and five alternative bridge lengths for the extension of Wall Street in order to minimize impacts to the Fanno Creek floodway, Pinebrook Creek, associated wetlands and ponds. The proposed location of the Wall Street connection to Hall Blvd which is approximately 360 feet south of O'Mara Street has several advantages over other alignments: a shorter bridge (320 feet) over Fanno Creek will span both the creek and its floodway, minor impacts to wetlands located east of Fanno Creek, elimination of cut-through traffic on O'Mara Street, a neighborhood route serving existing residential developments. Oregon Department of Transportation's (ODOT) access spacing standard for Hall Blvd is 500 feet minimum with a minor deviation limit of 475 feet. Due to the fact that four existing private driveways and a public roadway are located within 475 feet of proposed Wall Street, consolidation of driveways on Hall Blvd is required with the construction of the library and the Fanno Pointe Condominiums. As the rail crossing has not been approved for extension of Wall Street, construction of the first 425 feet of Wall Street to serve as a common access for the library and condominiums meets the access spacing standard required by ODOT. Wetland creation, wetland enhancement, wetland restoration and stream channel construction will be also included in the construction of 425 feet of Wall Street. The extension of Walnut Street from Highway 99W over Fanno Creek to Ash Street then north to intersect with Scoffins/Hunziker Street is one of the improvements identified in the TSP for enhancement of intra-city circulation. Funding has been allocated in FY 2004-05 for completion of a corridor study to determine a feasible alignment for the extension. Staff has requested the funding be carried over into FY 2005-06 to allow time for incorporation of improvement concepts of a Downtown Improvement Plan into the study. 1:\eng\vannie\cip\2005-06\executive summary march 1, 2005.doc Executive Summary - FY 2005-06 CIP March 1, 2005 Page 8 of 9 ATTACHMENTS Executive Summary - FY 2005-06 CIP March 1, 2005 Page 9 of 9 CITY OF TIGARD PRESS RELEASE 13125 SW Hall Blvd. January 7, 2005 Tigard, Oregon 97223 For Immediate Release Contact: Vannie T. Nguyen, P.E. CIP Division Manager City of Tigard 503-639-4171, ext. 2460 FY 2005-06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Public Meeting January 19, 200 - 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Tigard City Hall - Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 This public meeting is your opportunity to provide input on any proposed projects or submit suggestions for additional projects. The City's CIP (Capital Improvement Program) includes improvements to City streets, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, water, parks and other City facilities. The CIP formulation for Fiscal Year 2005-06 began on November 4, 2004 with a CIP overview on the "Focus on Tigard" program. Comments received will be considered in the development of a list to be submitted through the formal budget process for funding. The CIP formulation process is outlined as follows: ➢ CIP Process overview - November 4, 2004 ➢ Draft List of CIP projects posted on the City's website - December 28, 2004 ➢ Citywide Meeting - January 19, 2005 ➢ Planning Commission Meeting - February 7, 2005 ➢ City Council Meeting - March 15, 2005 ➢ Modify CIP project list - mid-March to late-April 2005 ➢ Budget Committee approval - mid-May 2005 ➢ Planning Commission approval - late May 2005 ➢ City Council approval - mid-June 2005 ➢ Program becomes effective - July 1, 2005 Citizens will have other opportunities to comment on the project list during the formal budget process leading to adoption of the CIP for FY 2005-06. Please direct comments to: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E., City Engineer us(a,ci.tigard.onus 503-639-4171 Ext 2470 Vannie T. Nguyen, P.E., CIP Division Manager vannieaci.tigard.or.us 503-639-4171 ext 2460 i:\eng\20052000 fy cip\cip program fy05-06\press releases\fy 200500 cip public meeting 1-19-05.doc Page I of I FAX TO: 0 TIGARD TIMES 0 OREGONIAN 0 REGAL COURIER 0 OTHER: City of Tigard Fiscal Year 2005-06 A2i -i k Y0MIGARD Capital Improvement Program Open House Sanitary Sewer Street System pyJ 'x Storm Drainage ,Yt4 .y. Wl..•L) ~ 11 ~ r . ,rfti t ~ QY : r: rt '1 Join us .Wed., January 19th Town Hall _ 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 6:30 - 8:00PM at t 1 7 t l I I 1 f - City Facilities Water System Park System We Need ou u rn For more information go to: Contact: Vannie T. Nguyen, PE http://www.ci.tigard.or.us_ or 503-639-4171 ext 2460. If you would like to provide written comments please mail this back to: Vannie Nguyen, PE City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Or drop off at City Hall or the Library on or before January 19th D ~k rovlde written comments . to p Gk to*. ou would 1►ke e marl th►s ba If y leas PE nnie N90 Ia ;t of -T,gard G y Vn Hall Blvd • QTY OF 3125 S 97223 gth Tigard' OR re Janua~_--- on or befe ~r a►► or the Ijbrary oil at City Or drop ;cos jv~ JIt a AAAA rye. J~ q dvI` ' D~ 4AAA 0/yA If you would like to provide written comments t please mail this back to: Vannie Nguyen, PE City of Tigard i 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ry.Tigard, OR 97223 Or droo off at City Hall or the Library on or before January 19th Gam- l/ ~ 21 F05i VII1 ogand of.T~ f .T ~g CITY OF'LIGARD Year 2op5-o Fiscal o ram nt Pr oveme , r • al ~mpr 0 U ~qwJ'4a ~t 0,~,~~ $d~. JIM open LJ sewer ry Sanita Storm Dr street System i?r':'~ F.s..-~_'P~;~s1~~+~ ;a; ~ ' ~ : ; i j~tii; ~f j ,~l ~,a ~ ~ a ~L••' S,q~. r,,• } ~~t rr~y~•' • d'`~ `d5 .1~59'i5~r'i~''..a '~'t~'~.~~s•>;r ;Ir' •~~K~'d.' ~•.rS` %~1 .C - 4 +~I di + e ~~R F 'b' ` tE":`+~1'. a•' ~ ry ~!'1:. join us y ti ed., januar w _ Town Ma11 SW a lv 13125 B.OOPM 6.30 axv.c'.c.-. Yt ~ i • . ~tl 1 +tl. 'l 1 } C ?l In1~~fy. ~ J.. rsc:•. ~~yt`~„2F :t: ~ . J •'1y~`t r Y t _ ~ ~.r:"✓.:•' .r, f ~?11. ter sys ei cilities ity F Park system u n a ee +aur V PE Contact: Vannie T 2460 en formation go t°. or 503-639-4171 ext For more ►n ard.or.us http:llwwW •ci.tig 1 ,fIJ V\f -T X3--3 COMMENTS (so3 624 ©ts e r Na e or Dist 'ct o.: -Xtlj W 1 N 0,r-R-`y q N I a Z7 ACT w \A O L,-C- ~ a LTC-~~y 'Tb NNy P i. J. W a 2 Nf6 Ld P +v\-Evv -r v.tOJ t_D *1\ A1~E f~S (~vE (jiff A~-Te2N RAJ wyq~ o fL ~C1t~-0 \lG K TR-'ELF Fl E o N -\-H CiQo~ n►~5 -T~~A-( T vvo j u1 NLA14~ S l~ S \J 1 (ZFS iV~,(- NT 1,P, L PUT l'} E S WC- S d C 1} t 1-DE N h v SE CON S'T Q c r( o N U~ AC) N C N D R 64-4- ~ i tt E- t_J t-~ i~~ C=R A N A► CY GLL Name - Address & Phone would be nice but not required.' Ro J e Pii--u< A-4-k TIART Tl CrR RD C.1 y` )-IN LAG- P 1q1 os ~ PROJECTS FOR THE 2005 CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CITY OF TIGARD SUBMITTED; BY SUE BEILKE, DIRECTOR, BIODIVERSITY PROJECT OF TIGARD January 19, 2005 We are delighted to take part in this important civic opportunity by providing the following projects that citizens believe are crucial to improving the quality of life here in Tigard as well as protecting our natural resources. With input from many citizens, we have developed these projects in order to enhance our community. 1. Marked crosswalks and lights at Fanno Creek trail crossings: Provide marked crosswalks as well as flashing lights at the points where Fanno Creek trail crosses Tigard street and SW North Dakota street. This will improve the safety of the users of the trail and make it more enjoyable. We have talked to many citizens who use this trail about this and it is a high priority. Cost: No estimate at this time, but most likely at least $10-15,000 for each crossing. 2. Replace parts of Fanno Creek trail with boardwalks: There are a number of low, wetland areas on the trail which flood quite often in the winter and spring months, making the. trail un-useable, even after 1 or 2 inches of rain. Replacing the asphalt with a boardwalk would all ow users to have access to the trail in the winter, would allow for better drainage and improve the hydrology in these areas, and prevent users from trampling all the vegetation next to the trail which is what currently happens. Cost: No estimate at this time, but we currently have a project approved from last year for $10,000 which has still not been implemented and needs to be done in 2005. Once this project is completed we will have a good idea of what other trail replacements will cost. 3. Provide interpretive signage at Summer Lake Park: A number of years ago we worked with a former parks director to develop interpretive signage at the park. We would still like to see this completed so visitors would learn what species of birds, etc. use the park and also use it as an educational tool, in particular to ask people not to feed the ducks and geese and explain why this is a bad thing to do. Several good places for signage would be by the bridge crossings in the center of the park where they would be highly visible. Cost: No estimate at this time but possibly in the range of $5-10,000. 3. Land Acquisition: Use some of the CIP funds to begin land acquisition of several parcels that would nicely complement the parks systems in Tigard as well as protect valuable resources including large old growth trees and wildlife. While these funds most likely are not sufficient to purchase the land, they could be enough to fund an option to purchase, allowing .the city to meanwhile work on funding the full cost of the land. • Black Bull - an 8 acre parcel along Fanno Creek off North Dakota Street. bleludes wetland, floodplain and riparian values, as well as high wildlife values including 2 State listed species. Cost: No estimate at this time. • Stonechase - a 4.5 acre parcel on North Dakota, the last upland forest left in this neighborhood. It would make an ideal park, is flat, has large trees on it and many species of birds currently occupy the forest including downy woodpeckers and towhees. We have already spoken to Dan Plaza, the parks director, and he agreed it would be a good site for a park. Cost: No estimate at this time. • Ash Creek and adjoining Gates property - the 9 acre Ash Creek parcel. is the largest remaining predominantly Western red cedar forest left in the entire Metro area. It has some of the highest wildlife and habitat values left in the city and would be an. ideal "nature park", something the residents in this area desperately need for they have NO park in this entire section of Tigard. Cost: No estimate at this time. • Fanno Creek east of the library site. There is a wetland and forest complex east of the creek and library which have extremely high wildlife and habitat values and includes several listed species and rare .plants. Acquisition of this parcel would greatly complement the open space around the library and provide acreage to the park system which is currently deficient in both open space and parks. Cost: No estimate at this time. . Vannie Nguyen - Re: '05-'06 CIP Comments Page-1: From: Vannie Nguyen To: BASIL CHRISTOPHER Date: 1/28/2005 9:55:14 AM Subject: Re: '05-'06 CIP Comments Basil, 1. The deadline for making comments is Feb 28, 05. 2. Email would be fine. 3. I'm addressing public comments in a report to be submitted to the Planning Commission/City Council for review in their meetings of Feb 7 and March 15. People submitted comments will get a copy of my report. However, any comments received after the Citywide meeting won't be addressed in the report. 4. Yes and no depending on projects. We evaluate all comments before recommending for approval. 5. In the report mentioned earlier. 6. You can attend the City Council Workshop meeting on March 15 which is not a public hearing. The meeting is for Council input on proposed projects. Two public hearings will be conducted by the Planning Commission and City Council in May and June 2005 respectively prior to adoption of the program. Please call me at 503-7182460 if you have additional questions. Thanks. "BASIL CHRISTOPHER" <Basil_Christopher@msn.com> 1/27/2005 9:56:42 PM Vannie, I have several questions regarding the proposed CIP projects, and the CIP process. 1) Beside the one public meeting, do I have other options for making comment on proposed 05-06 CIP projects? 2) If yes, how should I make comments, email? 3) What happens with my comments? And how are they handled and/or addressed? 4) Will any of my comments make a difference in the final selection of projects? 5) How do I find out about the comments made by others. 6) Will there be opportunity for members of the public to talk informally with City Council about the proposed projects? (tour?) Thanks, Tigard Resident, Basil Christopher Vannie Nguyen - Re: '05-06 CIO Comments Page 1 From: Vannie Nguyen To: BASIL CHRISTOPHER Date: 1/28/2005 10:04:54 AM Subject: Re: '05-'06 CIP Comments Basil, My previous response to your question No. 1 will need tore modified as follows: 1. The deadline for making comments is Feb 28, 05. Submittal of comments after this date will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Thanks "BASIL CHRISTOPHER" <Basil_Christopher@msn.com> 1/27/2005 9:56:42 PM Vannie, I have several questions regarding the proposed CIP projects, and the CIP process. 1) Beside the one public meeting, do I have other options for making comment on proposed 05-06 CIP projects? 2) If yes, how should I make comments, email? 3) What happens with my comments? And how are they handled and/or addressed? 4) Will any of my comments make a difference in the final selection of projects? 5) How do I find out about the comments made by others. 6) Will there be opportunity for members of the public to talk informally with City Council about the proposed projects? (tour?) Thanks, Tigard Resident, Basil Christopher Vannie Nguyen - Nomination of Capital Improvement Project - 69th, 70th and Lola Lane Storm Drainage Page 1 t From: "John Frewing" <jfrewing@teleport.com> To: "Vannie Nguyen" <VANNIE@ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 12/1/2004 9:06:45 AM Subject: Nomination of Capital Improvement Project - 69th, 70th0d Lola Lane Storm Drainage Vannie, VV Over the past year, I have commented to City of Tigard that the storm drainage system for the NE part of Tigard, actually starting in the City of Portland, on the south side of Taylor's Ferry Road and extending down to Lola Lane, is nonfunctional. The result is a surge of storm drainage down Lola Lane in even moderate rainfall events. On the CAP 45 walk this year, I pointed out where the drainage system is deficient at the upper end of Lola Lane. Yesterday I got a call from Al in Maintenance who told me of the history and their (maintenance) efforts in this area. He acknowledged that what they can do is limited and in response to my query, suggested a CIP nomination to you. This issue came to my special attention recently, when, as a Community Connector for Tigard, I was walking the area and a resident at the low point and downhill side of SW 70th pointed out the sandbags on the front of his lot which prevent water running into his house. This resident told me that the whole system in this area is to be evaluated in the spring of 2005, but Al knew nothing of such evaluation. Please consider this email a CIP nomination and include it on the list of projects for the coming year. I think what is needed is 1) a system evaluation according to modern standards, including evaluation of drainage coming from Portland, 2) modification of drainage ditches and placement of critical drainage in storm drain pipes in the area bounded by 65th, Taylor's Ferry Road, Alfred St and the upper terminus of Lola Lane, and 3) connection of the downstream end of this drainage into the storm sewer already located on Lola Lane, so it doesn't flow down the street. If you would like to visit the area, and have me show you the situation, I would be glad to do so. Of course, one doesn't see the impact except in a rainfall event, but maybe you have long term monitoring systems to document the condition to your satisfaction. The problem arises because of the historical development of the area when the area discussed above was developed, standards said simply to get the water off the lot. When Razberry Addition was built, there was no standard to consider storm water running on to the tract from uphill (the code requires such consideration now). Please confirm to me that this project is of the nature considered by the CIP process and it is placed on the nomination list. I await a suggested time for a tour. Thanks, John Frewing CC: "Gus Duenas" <Gus@ci.tigard.or.us> Vannie Nguyen -Nomination of Capital Improvement Project - 68th, 70th and Lola Ln Page 1 r From: Greg Berry To: jfrewing@teleport.com Date: 12/3/2004 2:57:49 PM Subject: Nomination of Capital Improvement Project - 68th, 70th and Lola Ln December 3, 2004 To: Mr. John Frewing From: Greg Berry, Engineering Department Subject: Nomination of Capital Improvement Project - 68th, 70th and Lola Ln. Thank you for suggesting a project in your December 1, 2004, e-mail. Staff is familiar with the lack of drainage facilities in this area having responded to numerous complaints. As you mentioned, Al Dickman of City Maintenance has asked the Engineering Department to evaluate the feasibility of improving drainage between the southern dead-end of SW 69th Avenue and Lola Lane. On Tuesday morning, December 7th, Al and I plan to visit the site; I will let know what we find. As for improving drainage in the remainder of this area, projects could be considered for the Capital Improvement Program, but are unlikely to be assigned a sufficiently high priority to be considered for funding. First, the projects would for the construction of local improvements; improvements primarily intended to serve lots fronting streets in which the storm drain is located. In general, construction of local improvements is the responsibility of the adjacent owners. The City's role is to maintain the facilities once they have been constructed to City standards. Occasionally, the City has installed local improvements where a small project could significantly reduce a hazard or eliminate continuing property damage. For example, following review of the drainage in this area, a culvert was installed at SW Alfred Street and 67th Avenue to prevent flooding of a street and a garage. A few other small drainage projects have also been completed in this area. We believe that no additional drainage projects appropriate for the Capital Improvement Program remain in this area. In addition, the installation of drainage facilities alone can not solve the drainage problems in this area. Other local improvements such as street improvements to collect rainfall runoff and disposal sites to receive the collected runoff are also required. Greg N. Berry, PE Engineering Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard Or 97223 Voice: 503 718-2468 Fax: (503) 624-0752 CC: Gus Duenas; Vannie Nguyen Vannie.Ngyyen - CIP request age 1 From: Diane Jelderks To: Vannie Nguyen Date: 1/19/2005 4:47:01 PM Subject: CIP request Edith - who lives on North Dakota Street close to the Morman Church complained that she had requested that pedestrian improvements were needed for the North Dakota Bridge to make it safe for pedestrain who have to walk to Greenburg Road to catch a bus... She said she was told this would be done last year and now she does not even see it listed as a project. She has lived in Tigard 61 years and doesn't understand why we give all the improvements to people who haven't even been in the City Limits very long. When is North Dakota going to get some attention??? She is not able to drive at night and will not be able to make your meeting. If fact she may have to quit driving all together and would like the ability to walk to where she could catch a bus. I told her I would pass on here conerns. Thanks, dmj Diane M. Jelderks Senior Administrative Specialist Engineering Department Direct No.: 503-718-2465 dianej@ci.tigard.or.us City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 CC: Gus Duenas Mike Mills_ N. Dakota capital improvements Page 1J - rr,&,p From: Chad Whipp <chad_whipp@symantec.com> To: <mikem@ci.tigard.or.us>, <vannie@ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 12/10/2004 9:02:52 AM Subject: N. Dakota capital improvements Hello Mike, Thanks for taking my call earlier and please let me know if there is anything I can do to provide you with more information. I live in-between 95th and 90th Avenue on SW North Dakota Street. Address is 9293 SW N. Dakota Street * The neighborhood needs more street lights there aren't any a block in either direction of my home * Sidewalks and Curbs to prevent the rain water from draining on my property and * Raised bumps to slow down traffic Thank you in advance for your time. Chad 503-459-3767 Chad Whipp (800) 388-3858 ext: 8180 (503) 617-8180 Direct (503) 614-2240 Fax JIG - - - - - 35---- ~'(.v~~ - -~'i. - - eala~ 0~. 1 1 /°9 ~ C-Oro P A~Ilatf A. 67 _ _ 9/7/04 via phone - She has seen other roads being resurfaced that are not as damaged as this road.- I check PMMP list, street was not listed - suggested citizen write letter requesting project be added and made a high priority. Upper Boones Ferry Road between 72nd Avenue and Interstate 5 (especially in front of Chevron Station and as you approach the tracks. Diane Jelderks tax e I tq.AZ4~ uL-e- poHA--ol-e-2 ,dA.W FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION Dr. Gene Davis, President 10875 S.W. 89P Street ~r Tigard, Oregon 97223 USA Tel: 503 246-5862, fax: 503 977-9343 -.A k Email: fief-india@comcast.net Web: www.finf-india.com Bill Monahan Ph: 503-639-4171 City Manager City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 may 5, Z.vo~ Re: Paving Spruce, SW 89th, and Thorn Dear Bill, I wonder if you would do me a favor. Please take a look at our streets, which are only about two blocks long, and the only streets in Tigard without blacktop. They are Spruce, 89 h, and Thorn. Several years ago we had every assurance that blacktop, with all city amenities, would be provided if we annexed into the city. As you know, I worked hard on that annexation, however we didn't get the street improvements. I wonder if you could review our street and see what it would take to put blacktop on it this year. Thank you very much, RECEIVED C.O.T. Dr. Gene Davis MAY 0 6 2004 CC: Gus Duenas, City Engineer Administration Vannie Nguyen -Comment on FY 2005-06 Street Capitol Improvement Projects Page 1 ~ a From: Brad Baugher <baugherb@oes.edu> To: <vannie@ci.tigard.or.us>, <gus@ci.tigard.or.us>, <craig@ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 2/15/2005 9:03:07 AM Subject: Comment on FY 2005-06 Street Capitol Improvement Projects Tuesday, February 15, 2005 City of Tigard Craig Prosser - City Manager Vannie Nguyen - CIP Engineering Manager Gus Duenas - City Engineer Comment on FY 2005-06 Capital Improvement Projects My name is Brad Baugher and I am Co-president of Fans of Fanno Creek. Fans of Fanno Creek is a volunteer citizen group dedicated to the protection and restoration of Fanno Creek and its tributaries. We have been working for more than a dozen years in the watershed to protect and enhance the creeks, with several major projects and thousands of volunteer hours over that time. I am writing to comment on the CIP proposal on The Hall Blvd/Wall Street Intersection - Phase 2 at a cost of $500,000. This project appears to be a companion to the proposed crossing of a significant natural area, an important local wetland, Fanno Creek, and an active railroad line, namely, the extension of Wall Street between Hunziker Street and Hall Blvd. Tigard has already spent three hundred thousand dollars on this ill-conceived project, with little to show for it. Indeed, there is another request in the current CIP list for an additional $40,000 to prepare for 3any expenses incurred in the preparation of environmental permit applications and the railroad crossing application and hearing❑ for Wall Street. The natural areas along Fanno Creek will have a greater long-term financial benefit to Tigard if kept intact, both in terms of increased property values and enhanced quality of life for Tigard residents. Fans of Fanno Creek opposes the Wall Street extension and any project which would lead to the same outcome because it would have such a negative impact on important natural values in the area. As the largest stream, Fanno Creek is the backbone of this watershed. Another bridge over Fanno Creek would bring with it additional stress to the native cutthroat trout and other wildlife that call the creek home. It would also result in increased water temperatures and pollution through additional street runoff pouring directly into the creek as well as a variety of other harmful impacts on the surrounding wildlife and habitat. The stated purpose of this 425-foot spur and intersection would be to provide common access to Hall Blvd. for the new library and Fanno Point Condominiums. Both already have adequate access to Hall Blvd and the expense of this dead end road simply does not make fiscal sense. The safety concern that might otherwise call for an additional street driveway for each development has also been addressed since both developments contain internal building sprinkler systems for fire. The construction of The Wall Street extension has met with opposition for a variety of sound reasons and the City of Tigard has many other important projects which could use the additional half million dollars listed for this project. Another project listed on the 2005-06 CIP that leads to the same concern is Vannie Nguyen - Comment on FY 2005-06 Street Capitol Improvement Projects Page 2 the Walnut/Ash/Scoffins Connection Feasibility Study. From the description, it is clear that this project would also include yet another crossing of Fanno Creek. Fans of Fanno Creek will oppose any additional crossings that involve a significant natural area. We encourage the City of Tigard to recognize these natural areas and green spaces as valuable assets to the livability of the city and to make a concerted effort to protect these assets when considering future development. Thank you for your time. Brad Baugher, Co-president Fans of Fanno Creek baugherb@oes.edu Fans of Fanno Creek Volunteers dedicated to the restoration and protection of Fanno Creek. and Its tributaries Tuesday, February 15, 2005 In S ~ V ~ . City of Tigard i Agustin P. Duenas', P.E., City Engineer 13125 SW Hall Blvd. F E 3 b 2005 D Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Duenas, CITY OF TIGARD My name is Brad Baugher and I am-Co-president of Fans of Fanno Creek. Fans of Fanno Creek is a volunteer citizen group dedicated to the protection and restoration of Fanno Creek and its tributaries. We have been working for more than a dozen years in the watershed to protect and enhance the creeks, with several major projects and thousands of volunteer hours over that time. I am writing to comment on the CIP proposal on The Hall Blvd/Wall Street Intersection - Phase 2 at a cost of $500,000. This project appears to be a companion to the proposed crossing of a significant natural area, an important local wetland, Fanno Creek, and an active. railroad line, namely, the extension of Wall Street between Hunziker Street and Hall Blvd. Tigard has already spent three hundred thousand dollars on this ill- conceived project, with little to show for it. Indeed, there is. another request in the current CIP list for an additional $40,000-to prepare for "any expenses incurred in the preparation of environmental permit applications and the railroad crossing application and hearing" for Wall Street. The natural areas along Fanno Creek will have a greater long-term financial benefit to Tigard if kept intact, both in terms of increased property values and enhanced quality of life for. Tigard residents. Fans of Fanno Creek opposes the Wall Street extension and any project which would lead to the same outcome because it would have such a negative impact on important natural'values in the area. As the largest stream, Fanno Creek• is the backbone of this watershed. Another bridge over Fanno Creek would bring with it additional stress to the native cutthroat trout and other wildlife that call the creek home. It would also result in increased water temperatures and pollution through additional street runoff pouring directly into the creek as well as a variety of other harmful impacts on the surrounding wildlife and habitat. The stated purpose of this 425-foot spur and intersection would be to provide common access to Hall Blvd. for the new library and Fanno Point Condominiums. Both already have adequate access to Hall Blvd and the expense of this dead end road simply does not make fiscal sense. The safety concern that might otherwise call for an additional street driveway for each development has also been addressed since both developments contain internal building sprinkler systems for fire. The construction of The Wall Street extension has met with opposition for a variety of sound reasons and the City of Tigard has many other important projects which could use the additional half million dollars listed for this project. Another project listed on the 2005-06 CIP that leads to the~same concern is the Walnut/Ash/Scoffins Connection Feasibility Study. From the description, it is clear that this project would also include yet another crossing of Fanno Creek. Fans of Fanno Creek will oppose any additional crossings that involve a significant natural area. We encourage the City of Tigard to recognize these natural areas and green spaces as valuable assets to the livability of the city and to make a concerted effort to protect these assets when considering future development. Thank you for your time. erely, . GG✓ , rad Baugher, Co-p si ent Fans o anno ree Fans of-fanno Creek P. O. Box 25835 Portland. OR 97225 Q111 o~% o Post Consumer Content ' A non-profit 501 (c)(3) organization 3M `4 . FY 2005-06 Presentation Overview Capital Improvement Program • Formulation Process • Program Areas March 15, zoos • Priorities for FY 2005-06 • Proposed Projects • What's Next? w R 2 Formulation Process Program Areas • CIP Overview - Focus on Tigard Street System Program (November 4, 2004) - Traffic Studies • Citywide meeting (January 19, 2005) - Traffic Safety-Related Projects • Planning Commission (February 7, 2005) - Pavement Major Maintenance • City Council (March 15, 2005) - Traffic Calming Program • Finalize Project List (March - May 2005) - Major Street Capital Improvements • Presentations in May and June 2005 - Bridge Replacements 3 4 Program Areas Program Areas • Sanitary Sewer System Program • Parks System Program i - Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance - Citywide Parks - Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvements - Trail Systems - Sewer Extension Program • Water System Program • Storm Drainage System Program • City Facilities System Program - Storm Sewer Major Maintenance - Storm Drainage Capital Improvements 5 6 Priorities for FY 2005-06 Priorities for FY 2005-06 • Initiate projects to improve traffic • Signalize the library entrance at Hall circulation across and on Highway Boulevard 99W • Construct the Wall Street approach to Hall • Initiate and implement projects in Boulevard to provide joint access for the support of the Downtown Improvement library and Fanno Pointe Plan recommendations • Install additional traffic calming measures • Continue to implement the Street • Continue with the Citywide Sewer Maintenance Fee funded projects Extension Program projects 7 6 r Priorities for FY 2005-06 • Perform storm and sanitary system repairs • Implement planned Parks projects Street Projects • Continue to acquire land for new pathways • Implement additional water system improvements • Evaluate and develop alternative funding sources for major street improvements 9 10 FHighway 99W/Greenburg Road Highway 99W/Greenburg Road 1 ~ f 7 • Feasibility Study, a • Alternatives study to determine feasible M aye` <f • . solutions for that intersection • Study will select the best alternative • Scope will be established for design and construction 11 12 2 Highway 99W/Greenburg Road Highway 99W Corridor Improvements • Study of the Highway 99W corridor to - Evaluate various alternatives for improvement I M - Look for potential parallel routes or connections - Review both land use and physical improvements .a J to improve circulation and reduce congestion - May be funded through a TGM grant - Result will be a package of projects and land use j strategies that can be implemented to improve 13 - - 14 conditions on Highway 99W I ~ McDonald Street (at Hwy 99) McDonald Street/Highway 99w • Provides a dedicated right-turn lane C c • Extends the left-turn lane to provide -t Widening of IY_ a McDonald additional stacking Street • Provides a dedicated through lane 99W to add a right- • Includes storm drainage improvements ' turn lane • Includes traffic signal system modification f a S: • l 15 16 I Hall Boulevard/Highway 99W Hall Boulevard/Highway 99W • MSTIP 3 Project • County has initiated the project t~ 771, • W&H Pacific is evaluating alternatives to ' , ✓ establish a scope for design and ' s "y,`\~_, constructions o~as~41~"`1 y ~r • Scope should be established in May I q; . `'I • Design and construction to follow ~\;~g~+' - °3 • Construction begins - Possibly late 2006 17 18 3 Hall Boulevard Dartmouth/72nd Avenue Intersection • All-way stop needs to be signalized -1 i r Widening of • Project widens the approaches and Hall a McDonald to installs a traffic signal system add a right- • Uses funds collected from developers to turn lane partially fund the project • Formation of a reimbursement district is ~being considered to fund the balance 19 20 Dartmouth/72nd Avenue Intersection 108th Avenue/Durham Road r' Development occurring along 1081h Left-turns onto Durham are difficult during peak travel hours r; Traffic location shows signal is justified at that Project will design and construct a traffic - signal at the intersection 21 22 108th Avenue/Durham Road 108th Avenue/Durham Road 23 24 4 Burnham Street Burnham Street • Project begins with design and rights-of- way acquisition z: • Street will be designed in accordance with Downtown Improvement Plan 4 • Project will support the Downtown revitalization effort 25 26 i ~Burnham Street Walnut Street Extension • Thin overlay planned for this spring Corridor study needed to determine • Would eliminate continued maintenance costs feasible corridor • Estimated costs: • Connects Highway 99W at Walnut Place - Travel lanes only - $50,000 with Hunziker Street - Full width overlay - $80,00 Study was delayed pending • Burnham reconstruction and widening expected to begin in mid- calendar year 2007 recommendations of the Downtown Plan • Would thin overlay be worth it for about 2+ years Downtown Plan recommendations of improved rideability expected by May or June 27 28 Walnut Street Extension FCU p coming Project ommuter Rail 29 30 0.. 5 Upcoming Project Commercial Street Commuter Rail (Lincoln Avenue to Main Street) • Existing narrow road with pedestrian traffic R R • Project will widen the street and provide a sidewalk • CDBG Funding approved • Gas Tax funding will supplement • Right-of-way needed from Portland & Western Railroad (potential obstacle) 31 32 I _ i Commercial Street (Lincoln Avenue to Main Street) Downtown Improvements t• f~" Placeholder for projects to be implemented # + Widening on based upon the Downtown Improvement north side to o provide a Plan recommendations { ` y pedestrian walkway to • Total of $150,000 set aside for the projects 3y y a4a Main Funding sources ~ Gas Tax Fund - $75,000 " +r,►vr~J~rn1 - General Fund - $75,000 33` 34 Sidewalk Projects Walnut Street (1351h to 121St) • Projects anticipated in conjunction with TriMet projects (support of the MOU with Washington County MSTIP-3 project TriMet) Will widen to 44 feet with curbs, sidewalks • Sidewalk improvements for and storm drainage - Pedestrian connections between transit stops City to participate with upgrades to water and key activity centers system, sanitary sewer extension, and - Extension of sidewalks to schools for safer underground utilities school access from residential areas 35 36 6 Greenburg Road Greenburg Road (Washington Square Drive to Tiedeman Ave) i ~f Existing Conditions Greenburg Road Improvements I - Congested 3-lane - Federally funded MTIP project (design roadway with and land acquisition) sidewalks a - Widening of Greenburg Road (Washington Square Drive to Tiedeman - Bike lane on one Avenue) to 5 lanes side' Project Status - Narrow median - - - Project design by consultant upcoming No center-turn lane 37 38 Wall Street Wall Street , • Signalization of library entrance under design MALL BLVD I WALL BTREHT STRUT tO • Construction of 425 feet of Wall proposed - Would provide joint access for library and Fanno Pointe Condominiums - Environmental permits have been obtained -Comprehensive Plan Amendment pending to remove one pond and realign Pinebrook Creek _ 39 40 Wall Street Pavement Overlays • Proposed LID would extend it across the creek • Options were discussed with Council at the -Highland Drive 1091" Avenue east February 15' workshop meeting ( ) • Construction of segments of Wall Street may be -Marion Street (124th to 121St) feasible James Street th to 121 S' • At-grade railroad crossing contested by ODOT - (1 24 ) and railroad - approval appears unlikely -Alberta Street • Loop down to Milton Court considered by property owner -124th Avenue • Will be brought back for Council discussion and direction on April 12, 2005 41 I 42 7 Pavement Overlays Greenburg Road (North Dakota to Center Street •Greenburg Road (North Dakota to Center) a. -Spruce Street (89th to Hall) .89th Avenue (south of Spruce) t ' r f ~'t3 -Thorn Street (east of 89th Avenue) -66th Avenue (south of Taylor's Ferry Road) s, Y -Pine Street (Reconstruction & overlay) -Other streets to be determined during the, next few months 43 44 f' ' f Greenburg Road (North Dakota to Greenburg Road (North Dakota to Center Street Center Street RIU.:,-;92_4 ~ - q 'y,arq 45 46 Pine Street Pine Street I - - y .4 r 4i ~t, 74 47 ILI , 4 48 - 8 Traffic Calming Street Striping • 2 speed humps on O'Mara Street • Shady Lane (Greenburg Road to 95th) (between Frewing and McDonald) • Johnson Street (Highway 99W to Grant) • 2 speed humps on 1001h Avenue (Sattler • North Dakota Street (Tiedeman to 1,500 to View Terrace) feet west) • Others to be determined based on • 681h Avenue (Dartmouth to Atlanta) neighborhood interest and rating system • Various other streets 49 50 Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension Program • Five -Year Program established by Sanitary Sewer Projects Council in 2001 • Fourth Year of the Program in FY 2005-06 • Completed the 100th & Murdock and 121 st Avenue sewer projects • Edgewood/O'Mara area coming in the spring 2005 51 52 I Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension Program FFY 005-06 Sanitary Sewer Projects Edgewood Street area Sewer Project Lots Status 45 services planned 10011 Avenue 21 Planned Cherry Street 25 Planned 971^ Ave/1001h Ave 21 Planned Hillview Street 6 Planned 112WWalnut 34 Planned _ Ash Avenue 11 Planned 93rd Avenue 33 Planned Subtotal 151 53k 54 9 Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation • Project scope Storm Drainage Projects - Rehabilitate approx. 600 feet of pipe - Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP) trenchless construction method will be used - Will be combined with rehabilitation of existing sanitary sewer lines - Continuing program till completed 55 56 I Highland Drive Drain Pipe Durham Road @ 108th Avenue • From 109th Avenue east 1,100 feet • Existing culvert not aligned with creek • Existing pipes are cracked or • Large rock in the middle of the creek crushed in spots Retaining wall needs repair • Project Scope • Project Scope - Remove and repair portion of retaining - Install new pipes wall - Install new manholes - Remove existing boulder - Install new catch basins - Extend and realign culvert 57 58 Durham Road @ 108th Avenue Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Retaining wall repair needed'': • Addresses minor storm drainage problems requiring more than normal maintenance effort >"Y,, n, • Next Fiscal Year's projects: s • Benchview Terrace (catch basin installation) • 1121^ Avenue (Line extension and catch basin installation) ^a 59 1601 10 FCity Facility Projects • Water Building remodel - Public Works will move into the water building City Facility Projects • Senior Center seismic upgrade design • PD Underground storage tank upgrade • Police & Records storage remodel - Remodel of existing Public Works operations building for consolidation of records and evidence in one location 61 62 Parks Projects • Park and Open space Acquisition and Development Parks Projects - Responds to the Council goal relating to growth in Tigard - Approximately 18.5 acres identified - Types include neighborhood parks, greenspace, and pocket parks 63 64 Parks Projects Parks Projects • Park and Open space Acquisition and Fanno Creek Trail Development - From Hall Blvd to shelter - From shelter to Wall Street • Amount proposed: $2,395,000 Park signs - Park SDCs - $1,174,355 Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge - Non-SDC funds - $1,220,645 Washington Square Regional Center Trail • Skate Park (from donations primarily) - Non-SDC funds must be obtained through Tualatin River Trail (Cook Park to bridge) grants or other means Skate Park Development and Construction 65 66 l~ Parks Projects Parks Projects Fanno Creek Park and Trail r0- 1 ' Jil Fanno Creek Trail -Hall Blvd to Wall Street thru library 67 68 property Parks Projects I Skate Park re+R~?7~Qr f~-a. S a p ate Location Water Projects `V Tigard City Hall & Permit Center 69 70 1 Water Project Other Water Projects • 3 MG Reservoir Project • 550-foot zone connection to Beaverton - 550-foot elevation 550-foot zone 12-inch loop system - Originally proposed for the Alberta Rider around the Canterbury Hill area { Elementary School site • Aquifer storage & recovery production well and other ASR projects - Alternative site in the vicinity currently being explored Water line replacements in conjunction with street projects - Most likely would not be constructed until 2006 or 2007 Miscellaneous other water projects 71 72 12 Potential Additions or Revisions I What's Next? • Proposed Local Improvement District for 791t, Avenue Improvements Finalize FY 2005-06 CIP - Resolution to prepare a Preliminary Engineer's Submittal through the City's Budget Report will be considered by Council on April Process 12, 2005 Presentations to: • TGM Grant funding for the Highway - Budget Committee (May 2005) 99W Corridor Study - Planning Commission (May 2005)) - City Council approval (June 2005) - review by lication ODOT submitted received favorable Program effective July 1, 2005 review 73 74 13 AGENDA ITEM # ~O FOR AGENDA OF 3/15/05 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Continued Discussion of a Proposed Resolution to Support Collaboration with Washington County Jurisdictions Regarding Proposed Changes to Goal 14, Urbanization and the Urban Growth Boundary Administrative Rules PREPARED BY: Duane Roberts DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ' ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Review and discuss a proposed resolution (or resolutions) supporting (L) region-wide collaborative efforts to revise Goal 14, Urbanization and Urban Growth Boundary, administrative rules and (2.) region-wide efforts to limit Metro's authority to adopt land use controls. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Council should provide direction to staff regarding additions or revisions to the agreement and the specific issues the resolution should highlight. INFORMATION SUMMARY At its February 22, 2005, meeting, Council reviewed and discussed a draft resolution that (1.) supported region-wide efforts to revise the Goal 14, Urbanization and Urban Growth Boundary, administrative rules, and (2.) supported efforts to build a region-wide consensus in support of limiting Metro's authority to adopt local land use controls. The Tigard resolution was modeled on a recently-adopted City of Tualatin resolution that advocated for limiting Metro's authority to expand the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The March 15th agenda item is a continuation of the February 22 discussion of local control issues. At the February meeting, Council spoke of approaching this issue from a broader and more Tigard-specific standpoint, as opposed to the narrower UGB expansion process referred to in the Tualatin Resolution. The Council goals that would apply are No. 3, Address Growth, wl2ich is defined, among other particulars, as undertaking comprehensive planning for the City and seeking changes to Metro. Staff is seeking direction from Council on how to proceed with drafting a resolution or resolutions that reflects Council consensus on this subject. Briefing materials accompanying in this packet include copies of the draft resolution, minutes from the initial February 22, 2005, Council discussion on this topic, a copy of Tualatin Resolution No. 4301-04, a March 2, 2005 e-mail from Tualatin City Manager Steve Wheeler with draft legislation, and some information on and a draft of Senate Bill 730. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None considered VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Goal 1: Growth Management: Growth will be managed to protect the character and livability of established areas, project the natural environment and provide open space throughout the community. ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment # 1: City of Tigard - Draft Resolution. Attachment #2: Excerpts of February 22, 2005, City Council Discussion Attachment #3: City of Tualatin Resolution No. 4301-04 Attachment #4: March 2, 2005 e-mail from Tualatin City Manager Steve Wheeler and attached draft legislation. Attachment #5: Information on and a Draft of Senate Bill 730 FISCAL NOTES N/A i:\admtpacket'05t050315W rb4ais.dac Attachment 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TO SUPPORT COLLABORATION WITH OUR WASHINGTON COUNTY NEIGHBORS REGARDING PROPOSED CHANGES TO GOAL 14 (URBANIZATION) AND THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY EXPANSION ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, AND TO SUPPORT LOCAL CONTROL OVER THE LAND-USE PROCESS. WHEREAS, as an incorporated city in the state of Oregon, the City of Tigard is subject to state land-use planning laws and must have an adopted Comprehensive Plan that results from broad citizen involvement that meets mandatory state standards, which include 19 statewide planning goals; and WHEREAS, as an incorporated city in the Portland metropolitan region, the City of Tigard also is located within the service territory of Metro, which has the primary responsibility for regional land-use and transportation planning; and WHEREAS, in October 2004, the City of Tualatin passed Resolution 4301-04 which voices local concerns in defining Metro's role in balancing regional and local issues, including the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) expansion; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard recognizes that while regional efforts have focused on establishing and amending the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), critical aspects of implementation have been overlooked, including the process of converting urbanizable land to urban land, the timing of conversion, and the availability of public facilities, services and patterns; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard feels strongly that implementation must be addressed in a cohesive and comprehensive manner - including annexation - prior to development, or areas will continue to urbanize without adequate services, creating additional costs and administrative burdens to jurisdictions providing services and creating unincorporated urbanized areas which are in direct opposition to Goal 14; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard recognizes that there have been efforts to clarify Metro's authority under the Metro Charter based on the Oregon planning program principle which emphasizes citizen involvement and direction and local land use controls; any directive by Metro to address local plan and zoning content is inconsistent with state law and prevents the exercise of balanced legislative judgment by a.local council. Resolution No. 05- Page I 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The City of Tigard supports region-wide collaborative efforts to work on Goal 14 Urbanization and Urban Growth Boundary administrative rules in order to address transition of urban uses and services in unincorporated areas, including annexation before development. SECTION 2: To assure that the Tigard Comprehensive Plan reflects our community's sense of place, the City of Tigard supports region-wide efforts to limit Metro's authority to adopt local land-use controls. SECTION 3: This resolution takes effect immediately. PASSED: This day of , 2005. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder - City of Tigard Mdmtpaeket'05100222Wrb resolution.doc Resolution No. 05- Page 2 Attachment 2 Excerpt - Februrary 22, 2005, City Council discussion: 7. DISCUSS A PROPOSED RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT COLLABORATION WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY JURISDICTIONS REGARDING PROPOSED CHANGES TO GOAL 14 (URBANIZATION) AND THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, AND TO SUPPORT LOCAL CONTROL OVER THE LAND-USE PROCESS Interim City Manager Prosser advised that staff developed a draft resolution to attempt to address some of the issues discussed by Council previously. Council discussion followed. Mayor Dirksen said that in reviewing the draft resolution he was not sure the issues were addressed. He noted concerns that the wording was not strong enough, but upon consideration he suggested that what might be needed is more than one resolution. The proposed resolution really addresses more the issue of collaborating with Tualatin and other cities. The City might want to consider the proposed resolution or a modification of the resolution at this time and then consider further steps to take in the future which addresses more directly the concerns by the City of Tigard. Councilor Sherwood asked if Senate Bill 730 would address some of the concerns. Mayor Dirksen said the Senate Bill would address issues at a state level, but he didn't think it would conflict with the proposed action before the City Council. Councilor Sherwood suggested the Council consider a resolution supporting Senate Bill 730. Mayor Dirksen thought this might be something to consider in the future. Councilor Wilson said he would be uncomfortable considering any resolution at this time. He noted this was the first opportunity for the Council to discuss Metro at all, other than the*discussion at the previous goal-setting session. He said, "We're not happy. I'd rather discuss things at a policy level ...what are our problems. While I appreciate our relationship with Tualatin ...I think that our issues are slightly different and I'm not sure that they frame the problem entirely as it should be... I would rather just throw it out for discussion... about what our issues are." Mayor Dirksen noted that Tualatin has requested another meeting between their Mayor and other cities to continue this discussion. He said that, "Perhaps, through that process we could further clarify what Tualatin would ask of us..." and then the Tigard Council could consider a resolution in support. Then, the Mayor suggested, in a separate discussion, the Council could discuss the issues pertinent to the City of Tigard. The Mayor said that one of the questions the City of Tualatin is asking is, "Are cities interested in continuing this discussion?" 0 Councilor Sherwood noted one of the biggest issues for Tigard is density. She said she thought the Mayor should continue with the discussion with Tualatin. She questioned whether a resolution would be the appropriate way to show support for Tualatin. Interim City Manager Prosser said staff had understood there might be a timing issue; however, he was hearing from Council that more discussion is needed. He suggested looking at future tentative agendas to schedule a longer discussion at a workshop meeting to discuss and identify policy issues. After that, staff could redraft the resolution for Council consideration. Council agreed with Mr. Prosser to schedule this item for more discussion. Mayor Dirksen will continue to go to the Tualatin meetings. He asked Councilor Harding if she would be available to attend some of the Tualatin meetings, which are usually held during business hours. She confirmed that she would be available. Mayor Dirksen said that one of the outcomes the City of Tigard is looking for is for more flexibility when it comes to redrafting the Comprehensive Plan. Councilor Wilson said, "I think we need more than a change of heart at Metro. We need a Charter change or a new state law... because personalities have come and gone... it's structural. It seems almost really unlikely that much is going to change by the time we get our Comp Plan done ...I'm a little uncomfortable in waiting two months to even discuss in broad terms our frustrations." Mr. Prosser reviewed the tentative agenda with the Council and with some rearrangement of agenda items; this topic was scheduled for further discussion at the March 15, 2005, workshop meeting. I:tadmkeath&=%2005te:cerpt 05 02 22 - metm.d= Attachment 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4301-04 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUALATIN, OREGON DESCRIBING PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY EXPANSION PROCESS WHEREAS Tualatin is a city in the territory of the Metropolitan Services District (known as "Metro"); and WHEREAS cities in the Metro region have their urban boundaries established by Metro; and WHEREAS the Metro Policy Advisory Committee (MPAC) is a Metro committee charged with providing a voice and input for Metro cities'on Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) expansion issues; and WHEREAS there has been mounting frustration and concern in Tualatin in particular, and many cities in general that the UGB expansion process does not balance local needs and concerns with regional issues, and that soil classification predominates in Metro led UGB expansion decisions; and WHEREAS the City of Tualatin proposes the following seven 'principles of legislative change be adopted and incorporated in appropriate sections of Oregon Revised Statutes, Oregon Administrative Rules and Metro drafted rules and guidelines concerning UGB expansion. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUALATIN, OREGON, that: Section 1. Additions to the Urban Growth Boundary should not be determined solely by soils classifications, with exception lands always being the first to be considered for addition. Metro should be allowed to consider other factors, such 'as preexisting development in the area, the wishes of the adjacent cities that would have to serve the area, and other appropriate local concerns. Section 2. The frequency for reviewing whether the land supply is sufficient for development purposes should be changed from 5 years to no more often than every 7- 10 years. Section 3. The Legislature should enact or amend a statute to make it clear that Metro cannot add land to the Urban Growth Boundary of a city without the city agreeing to that addition. Resolution No. 4301-04 - Page 1 of 2 Section 4. The Legislature should enact or amend a statute clarifying that cities retain their zoning authority, separate from a UGB expansion. Metro cannot add land to a city's Urban Growth Boundary and specify the zoning type that the City would have to impose on that land. Section 5. The Metro Council election and representation process should be changed from districts to at-large to ensure a broader-based representation process. Section 6. The Legislature should enact or amend a statute to require lands added to the Urban Growth Boundary by Metro concurrently identify a viable transportation system to support the added land and the existing city transportation system in coordination with a city. Section 7. The Legislature should enact or amend a statute to require lands added to an Urban Growth Boundary by Metro concurrently have allocated funding for transportation infrastructure development in the added land and the existing city transportation system. INTRODUCED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of October, 2004. CITY OF A IN, OREGON By Mayor ATTEST: By City Recorder Resolution No. 430 1 -o4 - Page 2 of 2 Craig Prosser - Proposed UGB legislation Page 1 Attachment 4 From: "Steve Wheeler' <SWHEELER@ci.tualatin.or.us> To: <aloble@ci.wilsonville.or.us>, <sfadey@ci.westlinn.or.us>, <craig@ci.tigard.or.us>, <schultzr@sherwood.or.us>, <dschmitz@ci.oswego.or.us>, <davel@ci.hillsboro.or.us>, <time@ci. h illsboro.or. us> Date: 3/2/2005 5:16:25 PM Subject: Proposed UGB legislation To All - A couple months ago a group of Mayors met in Tualatin to discuss proposed changes to the UGB expansion process. I understand some are continuing to review and consider the City of Tualatin Resolution on that subject (No. 4301-04). Please share this e-mail with your Mayor or any relevant legislative committee. We understand this is ahead of feedback on 4301-04, but we need to move now due to legislative filing deadlines in Salem. Senator Devlin has agreed to carry this draft legislation, most likely attaching it to an existing bill. Please forward comments, reactions and suggested changes to Mayor Ogden (lou.ogden@juno.com as soon as possible. We plan to have this in'Senator Devlin's office this Friday. We remain interested in all constructive feedback on Resolution 4301-04 as well. Thanks in advance for your thoughts and advice. Steve Wheeler, City Manager <<UGBmetroLegisDraft.doc>> CC: <lou.ogden@juno.com>, "Maureen Smith" <MSMITH@ci.tualatin.or.us>, "Brenda Braden" <BBRADEN@ci.tualatin.or.us>, "Doug Rux" <DRUX@ci.tualatin.or.us> A BILL FOR AN ACT Relating to modifying standards for expansion of urban growth boundary; adding a new section to ORS chapter 197; and repealing ORS 197.298. Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: Section 1. A new section is added to and made a part of ORS chapter 197. (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of state law or regulation, no metropolitan services district with authority to expand an urban growth boundary may add land to the urban growth boundary without the consent of the city that will likely provide governance to that addition nor may it impose specific zoning or general zoning types on specific parcels or areas added without the governing body of that city giving its written consent (2) Before a metropolitan services district may add land to the urban growth boundary, it shall concurrently identify a viable transportation system to support the added land and the existing city transportation system in coordination with the city that will likely be the service provider to that added land. (3) In determining which lands shall be added to the urban growth boundary, a local government or metropolitan services district shall not make its determination on a single factor but shall consider all of the following: (a) The need to accommodate long-range urban population growth; (b) The need to accommodate housing needs in accordance with ORS 197.296; (c) The need for employment opportunities; (d) The availability of economically-feasible provision of public facilities and services; (e) The impact on environmental, economic and social concerns; (f) The compatibility of urban uses with nearby forest or farm land; and (g) The need to retain agricultural land and forestland in that area. Section 2. ORS 197.298 is repealed. Attachment 5 ----Reasons-to-Suppor--t SB 730 - - - - - - - - - The Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) recently ruled that a metropolitan district has broad authority under ORS Chap. 268 to prepare, as well as compel the adoption of land use zoning ordinances by cities and counties within the district. This ruling upheld adoption by the Portland Metropolitan Service District ("Metro")'of a Title 4 Ordinance which requires certain cities and counties to adopt and enforce detailed restrictions on mixed uses on industrial lands (relating to building size and floor area, street access, lot sizes and divisions, business type, etc.,) even if those restrictions conflict with their comprehensive plans and zoning ordinances. District ordinances like Title 4 usurp the traditional and longstanding city and county zoning authority and "home rule". SB 730 clarifies that a district's current authority, under ORS Chap. 268, permits it to adopt generalized policies to guide the contents of comprehensive plans and to review and recommend changes to these plans to ensure they comply with the regional functional plans, but does not permit districts to write comprehensive plans or land use regulations for cities and counties or compel them to adopt such particular plans or regulations. SB 730 makes metropolitan districts statutes consistent with its Charter Metro's Charter does not allow it to adopt comprehensive plans or prescribe the content of local zoning laws. SB 730 realigns ORS 268.390 with that original intent. SB 730 maintains the traditional home rule authority of cities and counties. Under Oregon's land use planning statutes and city and county enabling statutes, the authority to enact comprehensive plans and land use zoning regulations has been delegated exclusively to cities and counties'- a system that has worked for decades. SB 730 provides a clarification that this delegation was not intended to be repealed when ORS Chap. 268 was adopted and later amended. SB 730 does not take away a metropolitan district's authority over the compliance and enforcement of local zoning laws with state policy. As important as what SB 730 does, is what it does not do. SB 730 does not take away district's authority to review comprehensive plans and implementing land use regulations to ' assure compliance with state land use policies and regional functional plans. SB 730 provides needed certaintyfor economic development For Hillsboro and other cities and counties that have been successful in recruiting, keeping and nurturing industries and businesses, SB 730 will remove the prospects of businesses having to serve two "zoning masters"; a district and a city or county as a result of the LUBA ruling: If a district's authority extends to directing specific zoning ordinances, the land uses certainty associated city or county zoning ordinances since their inception in Oregon will be lost. This added layer of bureaucracy and land regulation authority will be a deterrent to economic development and business investment in cities and counties that would 6e subject to such a dual zoning regime. For more information, contact: MON PERR)NPACK FAX W. : 5032496592 Feb. 14 2005 03:39Pt1 P2 LC 2625 2%11/05 (BHC%ps) DRAFT ( S.6 73 0 SUMMARY Modifies standards for metropolitan service district review of compre- hensive plans and land use regulations of cities and counties within district to determine whether comprehensive plans and land use regulations comply with regional framework plan and functional plans. 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT 2 Relating to land use planning in metropolitan service district; amending 3 268.390. 4 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 5 SECTION 1. ORS 268.390 is amended to read: 6 268.390_ (1) A district may define and apply a planning procedure [which) 7 that identifies and designates areas and activities having significant impact 8 upon the orderly and responsible development of the metropolitan area, in- s cluding, but not limited to, impact on: 10 (a) Air quality-, 11 (b) Water quality; and 12 (c) Transportation. 13 (2) A district may prepare and adopt functional plans for those areas 14 designated under subsection (1) of this section to control metropolitan area 15 impact' on air and water quality, transportation and other aspects of metro- 16 politan area development the district may identify. 17 (3) A district shall adopt an urban growth boundary for the district in 18 compliance with applicable statewide land use planning goals. adopted un- 19 der ORS chapters 195, 196 and 197. 20 (4) A district may: 21 (a) Review the comprehensive plans [in.effect on January 1, 1979, or sub- 22 sequently) adopted by the cities and counties within the district. (which) that NOTE: Matter is boWacea typc in eo amended 3ec6an » neq matter li:atic and brarlettdj to csiriinp low to ho entitled. New nttiona are iu bulat a tppn FR64 PERR I NPACK FAX tom- : 5032496592 Feb. 14 2005 03: 40Ftl P4 • l LC 2625 2/14/05 1 affect areas designated by the district under subsection (1) of this section 2 or the urban growth boundary adopted under subsection (3) of this section 3 and recommend or require cities and counties, as it considers necessary, to, 4 make changes in [any plan to assur`e).a comprehensive plan to ensure that 5 the comprehensive plan and any actions taken under fit) the comprehen- 6 sive plan conform to the district's functional plans adopted.under subsection 7 (2) of this section and its urban growth boundary adopted under subsection 8 (3) of this section. 9 (b) Review and recommend changes to land use regulations of a city 10 or county within the district to ensure -that the land use regulations 11 implement comprehensive plan provisions related to a functional plan. 12 (5) Except as provided in ORS 268.330 (1) -and consistent with ORS 13 chapter 197, a district may not: 14 (a) Prepare or. adopt a comprehensive plan or a land use regulation. 15 (b) Adopt,. enforce or require a city or county within the district to 16 adopt or enforce a comprehensive plan provision or a land use regu 17 lation that prescribes or limits the zoning of specific land within a city 18 or county. 19 (c) Compel adoption by a city or county within the district of the 20 specific text of a land use regulation. 21 [(5)) (6) Pursuant to a regional framework plan, a district may adopt im- 22 plementing ordinances that: 23 (a) Require local comprehensive plans [and implementing regulations) 'to 29 comply with the regional framework plan within two years after compliance 251 acknowledgment- 26 (b) Require adjudication and determination by the district of the consist- 27 ency of local comprehensive plans and land use regulations with the re- 28 gional framework plan. 29 (c) Require each city and county within the [jurisdiction. of) the district 30 and making land use decisions concerning lands A6thin the land use juris- W diction of the district to make those decisions consistent with the regional [2] FROM PEP.RINPACK. FAX 140. 5032495592 Feb. 14 2005 03:40Pt1, P3 LC 2625 2/14105 1 framework plan. The obligation to apply the regional framework plan to land 2 use decisions shall not begin until- one year after the regional framework 3 plan is acknowledged as complying with the statewide land uise planning 4 goals adopted under ORS chapters 195, 196 and 197. 5 (d) Require changes in local land use standards and procedures if the 6 district determines that changes are necessary to remedy a pattern or prat- 7 tice of decision-making inconsistent with the regional framework plan. 8 [(6)) (7) The regional framework plan, ordinances that implement the re- 9 gional framework plan and any determination by the district of consistency 10 with the regional framework plan are subject to review under ORS 197.274. 11 (8) If a change in the local land use standards or procedures of a 12 city or county that are required under subsection (6)(d) of this section 13 cause the Land Conservation and Development Commission to find 14 that the comprehensive plan and land use regulations of the city or 15 county do not comply with statewide land use planning goals or with 16 rules adopted by the commission, the commission shall excuse the city 17 or county from compliance with the changes in land use standards or 18 procedures required by the district. 19 [3) MEMORANDUM ~b _f rn f 1l LL~ TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT PN_ i 4o DATE: March 15, 2005 Ito Cvr~ I ~ TO: Craig Prosser, City Manager GtIWVV FROM: Bill Dickinson, Police Chief VIA: direct SUBJECT: Legislative Bills of interest to Tigard I know that the City tracks a number of legislative efforts in Salem, but I would like to briefly bring your attention to 3 Bills which if passed, would have the potential to significantly increase our costs of operation. You may recall that virtually the same Bills were introduced in the last legislative session and were defeated at that time. I have attached for your reference a letter I sent to Senator Burdick in May of 2003 expressing my strong concerns at that time. The Bills were introduced in 2003 as Senate Bills 444, 445, and 446. The new version of these old Bills are now known as SB 319, 320 and 321. SB 319: Modifies the criteria used by arbitrators in public collective bargaining. As you know, police officers cannot strike, therefore we use arbitration and final last best offer as the means to resolve impasses. The arbitrator's decision is final upon us. Currently, the arbitrator must use the "interest and welfare of the public" as the primary consideration in evaluating the last best offers of both management and labor. SB 319 eliminates the current priority of public welfare and interest, and simply makes it one of several equal factors. Our concern under the proposed law is that an arbitrator could choose to place employee factors as a higher factor of consideration and ignore the public interest and welfare. My greatest concern here is that the arbitrator can impose his or her personal bias without being directed to consider the impact to the public. SB 320: This law would have the effect of making supervisors members of the union. In this situation, supervisors no longer represent the management, who in turn represent the elected bodies of government. The local effect is that the supervisors can not be held accountable for carrying out management initiatives, because they themselves are union members and would not carry out correction or discipline of their fellow union members. Some years ago, Tigard went to great lengths to remove Sergeants from the bargaining unit. Today all managers are part of the management team and are not committed to representing a labor organization. We worked hard to get to this point, and to lose this accomplishment would be a waste of money, not to mention, make it much harder to effectively supervise what police officers are doing on the street. Close and effective supervision of police officers is the only sure way of avoiding unnecessary lawsuits and liabilities. SB 321: This Bill is the most worrisome of all. It has the effect of modifying the definition of "employment relations" to include certain staffing levels and safety issues to be mandatory subjects of bargaining. In effect, if the union can convince an arbitrator that our current staffing level has "potential impact on the on the on-the-job safety and workload of employees", the city could be forced to staff at what ever level the arbitrator agrees. Since virtually EVERYTHING has the "potential" for having an impact on safety and workload (make and model of patrol cars, color or uniforms, insufficient training, ad nauseum...) we could be compelled by a non-police professional to achieve heights of staffing, training and equipping that would bankrupt the city. Past legislatures have correctly put limits on mandatory bargaining subjects as those things that have a "direct and substantial effect" on employee safety. Clearly police and fire managers care deeply about the safety of their staff, but placing those decisions into bargaining and arbitration processes, erodes the ability of elected officials to manage public resources and their ability to fulfill public expectations for service levels. In a worst case scenario, imagine the union convincing an arbitrator that our staffing level should be twice what it is today. If they prevailed in their position, the City would be compelled to double the police force. I suspect we would have to stop offering all other city services in order to comply with that decision. This bill removes management decision from elected officials and their police managers, and hands it over to an arbitrator's decision. Please feel free to call on me if I can provide any further information on these issues. May 7, 2003 Senator Ginny Burdick CITY OF TIGARD 900 Court Street NE S-317 OREGON Salem, OR 97301 RE: Senate Bills 444, 445, and 446 Dear Senator Burdick: I am writing to you today to offer my strongest opposition to the above referenced Senate Bills. I join the majority of police management officials in Oregon when I express to you our very sincere concerns about the ramifications of these misplaced legislative efforts. Senate Bill 444 has the effect of rolling back most of SB-750 (1995) in the criteria interest arbitrators must use to award either the labor or management last best offer package. It devalues the interest and welfare of the public criteria. Interest and welfare of the public is more than a financial matter and should remain the primary criteria for interest arbitration awards. The bill deletes consideration and weight to other services provided by the government unit criteria. Consideration and weight to other services provided by the government unit should continue to be a re uired criteria for interest arbitration awards. Without this criteria, services by strike-prohibited bargaining units may require more budget resources that would have been used to fund other essential state, city and county services. Further, SB 444 expands the definition of "comparable community" beyond communities of the same or nearest population range by stating "comparable community includes communities of the same or similar population". The population limitation on comparable communities should not be removed. Interest arbitrators are already comparing small city fire department bargaining units to large fire districts because as a part of their service, the fire district provides service to one or more small cities. As a result, small cities are being compared to and forced to pay the wages, fringe benefits, etc. of much larger entities with greater resources. This ultimately results in a dog chasing the tai I circumstance where the small cities get bumped to big-city pay scales, followed by big cities demanding to get paid more because they are bigger agencies, followed by the small cities again demanding to keep pace. The small agency work forces constantly demand to get paid the same as big agencies and the large agency work forces constantly demand to be at the top. There is no end to the upward spiral. In the case of Senate Bill 445, I am completely mystified. The effect of this would be to make virtually everyone in the police department a union member, from the Chief to the volunteer Reserve Officers. What may seem like a simple definition clarification has much more profound ramifications and is an effective tool to remove the traditional separation of 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-277 Senator Ginny Burdick May 8, 2003 Page Two management levels. I cannot see any issue which would warrant this bill to begin with, other than to reduce the ranks of management and supervisory personnel. Finally, Senate Bill 446 requires government entities to bargain over staffing levels and safety issues that have a POTENTIAL impact on the on-the-job safety and the workload of employees who are strike-prohibited. This change would erode the ability of elected officials to manage public resources and their ability to fulfill public expectations for service levels. Let us imagine for a moment that the legislature elected to reduce funding to the Oregon State Police because of huge revenue deficits. Now imagine the labor organizations were successful in determining that those reductions might have the POTENTIAL to make the remaining troopers' jobs dangerous. You, the legislature, would be forced to either hire back staff for which you had no budget, or you would have to pay exorbitant overtime costs to the remaining troopers so they can keep this artificial staffing level above that which you have authorized. In the extreme, you might be forced to abandon providing all other state services in order to pay for a service level which has been defined by an arbitrator. This is exactly the situation in which you would be placing our cities. It is, or certainly should be, strictly the purview of the state or local government elected officials to determine the level of service a municipality will deliver. It is not, nor should it ever be, the decision of an arbitrator to decide the service level to a community. The community, through their elected officials, should make that determination. SB 446 not only gives this authority to an arbitrator, it also expands the definition of strike-prohibited employees to force even more public safety employees into this category. During these austere times, it is a constant battle for public safety management professionals to deliver efficient, cost-effective services. I assure you that the members of the Oregon Association of Police Chiefs have no personal benefit from resisting these legislative efforts. We want nothing more than-to deliver excellent municipal services that balance the welfare and desires of our communities with the welfare of the public safety employees who work for us. Please help us to achieve these ideals by actively working to defeat Senate Bills 444, 455, and 456. Thank you for your consideration and please feel free to call on me if I can answer any questions or provide any further information. 0 Sincerely, William M. Dickinson Chief of Police cc: Tigard City Manager Tigard City Council OACP I Joanne Bengtson - Tgrd 05-proc.doc Page 1 IVY PROCLAMATION NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK March 28 - April 3, 2005 WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program has operated since 1974 to provide local governments with the resources required to meet the needs of persons of low and moderate income; and, WHEREAS, Community Development Block Grant funds are used by a vast number of cities, counties and neighborhood-based nonprofit organizations throughout the Nation to address pressing neighborhood and human service needs; and, WHEREAS, the City of Tigard, Oregon and other local governments have clearly demonstrated the capacity to administer and customize the CDBG program to identify and resolve pressing local problems, such as affordable housing, neighborhood and human service needs, flood relief, job creation and retention, and physical redevelopment; and, WHEREAS, the week of March 28 - April 3, 2005 has been reserved for recognition and appreciation of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT I, , Mayor of the City of Tigard, Oregon, do hereby proclaim the week of March 28 - April 3, 2005 as COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK in Tigard, Oregon and urge all citizens to join in recognizing the Community Development Program and the importance it serves to our community. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of Tigard, Oregon to be affixed this day of , 2005. Mayor DRAFT e 'l`` ga -'1`ualatin "L~fi o JOINT MEETING WITH TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, TUALATIN CITY COUNCIL, AND TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD AGENDA Monday, April 4, 2005 7 p.m. Tigard Library Community Room 13500 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard 1. Call to Order / Introductions 2. Joint Discussion on Methamphetamine issues 3. Update Park Bond projects -especially joint projects with TTSD - City of Tualatin 4. Update on Library capital improvement project - City of Tualatin 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Other Topics That May Arise I:1adm\cathy\ccat20051050404 joint meeting ttsd-tualatin.doc3/15105