City Council Packet - 10/19/2004+i n;.p: ~ea ea ...rj}il$ 2€R! ay y-!'; S yat{ "q s yY +r S r ~~,r .'-n r y v e t i y' Kr 'u_.' r+'3
a, • "'9.. N r w` +i"y a r S f Sr .Yi-
int
~+'''+.y ~ t+) r~~kV 4?~ a r }~,y - .1 7d , F a ~ ~ rW u~r1(s >sxxc~f r iJ. yr
rrt a4 ~4~aAf~?~•1'iif ,.r c ~ t• 1, t r i r S.,aY#' f.~7 fta a~lA
a.YY -.t firF'~' "`,~"~v!•b~i'r'~C,`l: ~`~`"f~7 ' ` - ti ' o- 5 ~'t k''y4}fNr ~Mr•s. `~"'~'r ~'r'~
Y , fad •~.tr~'`A'''~ ~.r, aZ+"' r ~l rf+z ~ tx-; :-a ,.f 'ii t :,r
'~'F ~ 'S.~ 5~r-y~1. ry~~'r .'~F3•S- 'v~ r a 7 ~'i1 ~ _ t f < ,r?t
F i *li2Sntl' F~s tt r 4 -
x_14 ' ~g .•7. ~ ~..r~,5~kc r - -
1 6. •f~taf~_ "yF~J~'}µf j. r.4~~ -
f `"Tx- I ARD C11 N,,,,,.".COUN C IL
`F~6•'~r yr
4. ;a k WORKSHOP MEETING
October 19, 2004
!u ,ks
tt'~~ k 4..1 A l
Agenda Item No2-77Z57
Meeting of /COUNCIL MINUTES
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING
October 19, 2004
1. TOUR PERMIT CENTER REMODEL PROJECT
Loreen Mills, Risk Management, briefly reviewed the layout of the building and where
each department will be located. During the tour, Ms. Mills pointed out the need to
run new power lines into the building in order to provide power for phones and
computers for 60 employees to be located in the building. She explained there is a
budget amendment scheduled for the Council's October 26 meeting for the
additional work to bring power to the building as well as hire licensed personnel to
install the wiring for phones and computers.
2. BUSINESS MEETING
2.1 Call to Order - City Council
2.2 Roll Call
2.3 Pledge of Allegiance
2.4 Council Communications 81 Liaison Reports
> NW Medical Team's Dinner
Liz Newton, Assistant to the City Manager, noted the NW Medical
Team has 11) relocated its International Headquarters to Tigard and 2)
in recognition of its 251 anniversary, is holding a special dinner
November 6.
Councilor Sherwood indicated she would attend the dinner on
November 6.
> Annual Employee Benefits Fair, October 20, 11 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Ms. Newton invited Councilors to attend the Benefits Fair.
> LOC Annual Conference
Councilor Sherwood indicated she would be attending the LOC Annual
Conference.
Tigard City Council Minutes Page 1
Meeting of October 19, 2004
> ADMINISTRTIVE ITEMS
a. Calendar Review
• October 26: City Council Business Meeting - 6:30 pm
• November 2: Election Day
• November 4-6: LOC Conference - Marriott Hotel Downtown
Portland
• November 9: City Council Business Meeting - 6:30 pm
• November 11: Veterans Day- - City Hall Closed
• November 16: City Council Workshop Meeting - 6:30 pm
• November 23: City Council Business Meeting - 6:30 pm
• November 25: Thanksgiving - City Hall Closed
• November 26: City Hall Closed
• November 29-December 4: National League of Cities Conference-
Indianapolis
2.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non Agenda Items
Mayor Dirksen noted the receipt of correspondence from John Frewing, 7110
SW Lola Lane, concerning some issues regarding the annexation of the East
Metzger area in 1987. He noted Mr. Frewing's letter would be forwarded to
the appropriate staff to review the concerns.
3. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OPPOSING STATE BALLOT MEASURE
37
a. Staff Report
Ms. Newton noted she had prepared the proposed resolution as directed by
Council after Alice Ellis Gaut had requested the Council on October 12 to go
on record in opposition to Ballot Measure 37 because the financial impacts on
Tigard would be catastrophic. After meeting with Mayor Dirksen, she had
prepared the resolution distributed to Councilors on October 15.
b. Public Comment
Alice Ellis Gaut thanked the Council for proposing the resolution and urged its
adoption.
' Lisa Hamilton-Treick indicated she supported the resolution as well.
Tigard City Council Minutes Page 2
Meeting of October 19, 2004
C. Council Discussion
Councilor Wilson noted the opinion written by former Representative Bob
Smith in the Eugene Register-Guard (Agenda Item No. 3, Exhibit 1) in which
Mr. Smith discussed the history of land use laws in Oregon, beginning with
Senate Bill 100, and the issue of compensation to owners. Mr. Smith is
supporting passage of Measure 37. SB 100 created a committee to
recommend a program to compensate landowners for regulations that took
their property, but the committee was never able to make any
recommendations to the Legislature regarding the compensation provisions, so
the vital component was never addressed. Measure 7 was passed by voters
four years ago. There has been a wake-up call to the legislature they needed to
address this omission, but again, nothing has been done through the years. As
a result, Measure 37 was drafted by "Oregonian's in Action." There is a good
chance the voters will pass the measure. While Bob Smith supports passage of
Measure 37, he is opposed as it will gut the land use system in Oregon. He
had some problems with the draft resolution. As a result, he had written a
revised resolution for Council's consideration (Agenda Item No. 3, Exhibit 2)
which was distributed to Councilors and members of the audience.
Councilor Moore noted he personally had a problem with the Council taking a
stand on any ballot measure because it is up to the voters to make up their
own mind on how they wanted to vote.
Councilor Sherwood asked what the history has been on the City taking a stand
on statewide ballot measures. Ms. Newton said Council took a stand on a
measure during Mayor Edward's term of office.
Councilor Moore concurred Council had discussed taking positions in the past,
but he personally feels uncomfortable advocating for or against a ballot
measure.
Councilor Woodruff noted that there will be impacts of Metro Goal 5 on
citizens of Tigard. Maybe if a measure has direct financial impacts on the City,
then City should let the voters know what the impacts are, but not advocate
one way or the other. He noted he had some concerns with some of the
wording in the original resolution. He felt Measure 37 should have been a
wake-up call to the legislature to address this issue.
Councilor Sherwood said she felt comfortable advocating voters of Tigard vote
in opposition to this ballot measure, because of the financial impacts the
measure would have on the City and that the resolution urges the State
Legislature to address this Issue.
Tigard City Council Minutes Page 3
Meeting of October 19, 2004
Councilor Moore explained he was uncomfortable suggesting the 45,000
residents of the City vote a specific way. At Council meetings, he votes the
vote their citizens. He is very concerned
way he feels would benefit the
citizen to City's
conscious at the ballot box.
about the rights of each c
He could support a resolution which outlines the impacts a measure would
have on the citizens and the city. After a quick review of Councilor Wilson's
proposed resolution, in Section 1, he would delete the words "and vote No on
Measure 37," so that it would read "The Tigard City Council urges all Tigard
residents to study the measure and its impacts." There would need to be other
changes relating to the word "oppose" in the resolution. He suggested in the
future, if Council was going to advocate for a State Ballot Measure, the
resolution needed to be started earlier in the election process.
Alice Ellis Gaut requested that the comment proposed resolution. The
allow public comment about
Council concurred.
Ms. Ellis Gaut indicated she was concerned with preserving the land use law
regulations. She understood Councilor Moore's personal concern that Council
should not endorse measures in general, but this measure could have such a
detrimental impact on Tigard, she felt the City needed to relay the effects the
measure would have on the City. She supports the draft resolution as written
by staff.
Gretchen Buehner noted she had reviewed both the resolutions proposed by
staff and Councilor Wilson. She felt it would be wise for Council to address
the issue of the damage this measure would have on the city as a whole. Both
resolutions would do that. There will be impacts on the average John Q.
Citizen if this measure is approved by the voters. She would urge all citizens to
vote "no" on Ballot Measure 37. It would be wise for Council to address the
impact question, as the regulations will negatively affect a lot of citizens. Many
people do not understand the ballot measure.
Councilor Moore stated if the City were going to do something, it should have
been done in September. make much a difference. He has already tvotedeand
before the election date to
returned his ballot.
Ms. Newton indicated she could try to put together a revised resolution for
consideration at the October 26 Council meeting.
Page 4
Tigard City Council Minutes
Meeting of October 19, 2004
The Council discussed the proposal, and there was unanimous concurrence by
the Council that it would really be too late to try to influence voters, and
would therefore not consider either of the resolutions at this time or at the
next Council meeting. In the future, if Council wants to adopt a position on a
ballot measure, it would need to be done earlier in the process, not a couple of
weeks before the election.
*At the end of the meeting, Councilor Woodruff indicated he had prepared
some language which the Council might consider. The Council concurred that
they would not take any action on a resolution to oppose or support Ballot
Measure 37.
WORKSHOP MEETING
4. JOINT MEETING WITH THE SENIOR CENTER BOARD
Staff Report
Karen Gardner, Executive Director of the Tigard Senior Center presented her staff
report which included a PowerPoint presentation (See Agenda Item #4, Exhibit 1 for
copy of PowerPoint slides) about the Center's operation, programs, volunteer
program, work being done on a Community Development Block Grant application to
improve the Center between 2005 and 2010, and their outreach program. In
addition to the PowerPoint slides, Ms. Gardner distributed copies of the October
activity calendar (Agenda Item #4, Exhibit 2) and the brochure entitled "Food for
Thought" for October, that is distributed by Loaves ex Fishes Center for the Tigard
Center edition available in both English and Spanish (Agenda item #4, Exhibit 3).
The following are major points Ms. Gardner included in her presentation:
• The Center serves not only the City of Tigard, but also seniors living in King
City, Metzger and Progress areas.
• Meals on Wheels are delivered to both homebound residents and at the
Center. When the restaurant closed in the Wells Fargo Tower, all the
restaurant fixtures, including tables and chairs, steam tables, dishes, glassware,
cutlery, etc., were donated to Loaves and Fishes, and the Tigard Senior Center
received tables and chairs.
• There is an "English as a Second Language" (ESL) program operated at the
Center in cooperation by Portland Community College, serving mainly
Hispanic and Asians.
• The Center is staffed by volunteers, with over 13,000 hours donated last year.
These services provided included operating the gift shop, delivering meals, and
so many other areas.
Tigard City Council Minutes Page 5
Meeting of October 19, 2004
At a recent geriatric conference she attended, she received information to
indicate people are going to live longer, which means more services are going
rn he needed by the elderly for a longer period of time. Service operations
.;,d to change to address the needs of seniors.
She described the Center's outreach program they operate, in an effort to
reach more seniors in their service area.
The CDBG grant they are applying for was reviewed. The staff is not sure how
the proceeds will exactly be used, but would probably be used to remodel the
kitchen/dining room, or possibly construct an addition to the building.
There will be a need for citizen's to be involved during the long range planning
component, there is always a need for more volunteers to help on the various
programs the Center operates as well as financial donations are always
welcome.
The following Board members described their involvement with the Center: Corrie
Stalk, Bill Gerkin, Kris Magaum, Arthur Davis, and Mary Ellen Seeger.
Councilor Sherwood indicated she would be willing to work on the CDBG grant
application with Ms. Gardner. She was very surprised by the quality of the food, and
the warm inviting atmosphere of the Center Itself.
Ms. Mills concurred with the excellent quality of the food.
Councilor Woodruff complimented Ms. Gardner on the operation, but indicated this
presentation should have been made at a regular Business Meeting in order to have the
presentation televised.
5. BRIEFING ON METRO PROPOSAL FOR MANDATORY BUSINESS RECYCLING
Staff Report
Tom lmdieke, Financial Operations Manager, presented an update on the recycling
program businesses are required to use in the Metro region. This program is intended
to reduce the amount of solid waste going to the landfill as a result of recycling. The
region's recovery rate for 2002 was 54%; the goal for 2005 is 62% recovery rate
and an increase to 64% recovery rate by 2009. This is for residential and business
recycling programs. Tigard has implemented a mandatory recycling program in 1996
patterned after the City of Portland's program, with a goal of recycling up to 50%.
The City works with haulers to monitor and implement the recycling program. Fees
for violations range between $500 and $5,000.
Tigard City Council Minutes Page 6
Meeting of October 19, 2004
Mr. lmdieke distributed a handout entitled "Recommended Practices Being
Considered by Metro" (Agenda Item No. 5, Exhibit 1), which details the various
programs Metro is considered.
Councilor Sherwood noted restaurants, caterers and grocery stores in the past had
been sending perishable foods to a depository to be used at food shelters, but by the
time the food was received, the food had gone bad and had to be put in the garbage
by the depository. The only thing that was being done was to move the disposal of
the food from the original source to the depository which was adding to the
depository cost of their garbage.
Councilor Woodruff asked how Tigard businesses compared to the 54% recovery rate
on a regional basis.
Mr. Imdieke replied Tigard is on target with the rest of the region. He routinely
receives information from the haulers on the amount of material that has been
recycled.
Councilor Wilson asked if manufacturers are using plastics that are recyclable. Mayor
Dirksen concurred that some of the plastics used by manufacturers are not recyclable.
Mr. Imdieke stated the region is working with many manufacturers to address this
concern.
Councilor VVi6wi stated new packing peanuts are being used that are completely
degradable. He recently received a package with the new packing peanuts; he tried an
experiment of putting water on the peanuts which dissolved the peanuts and the
residue could just be washed away.
Mayor Dirksen recessed the meeting for a short break at 8:19 p.m.
Mayor Dirksen reconvened the meeting at 8:25 p.m.
6. POTENTIAL PROJECTS FOR THE MSTIP TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL
PROGRAM
Staff Report
Gus Duenas, City Engineer, presented the staff report which included a PowerPoint
presentation concerning potential MSTIP Transportation Capital Program projects
(Agenda Item No. 6, Exhibit 1), copy on file with the City Recorder. During the
current MSTIP-3 program, Tigard and Tualatin submitted 2 projects, Beaverton
Tigard City Council Minutes Page 7
Meeting of October 19, 2004
submitted 1 project, and the rest of the projects were for other cities and the rest of
the unincorporated area. Washington County Board of Commissioners is now
soliciting applications for the MSTIP-4 funding cycle. They are looking at
$5,287,000 for this six-year period. Municipalities have until October 29 to submit
their requests, and the County Coordinating Committee will make their decision on
the applications on November 15, so this is a very fast-track system.
Mr. Duenas then reviewed each of the proposed projects that had been identified,
photos shown of the area, and costs identified. The proposed project list included:
Walnut Street (Tiedeman Avenue to 121" Avenue)
Greenburg Road (Shady Lane to Tiedeman Avenue)
Burnham Street (Main Street to Hall Boulevard)
• 72nd Avenue (Beveland Street to Dartmouth)
• 121" Avenue (Rose Vista Drive to Tippit Place)
• Scoffins/Hunziker/Hall Intersection Realignment and Signalization
Greenburg Road/Highway 99W/Main Street Intersection Improvements
Mr. Duenas also answered questions from Councilors during his presentation. Staff
recommended forwarding the following projects for Council consideration on October
26.
• Walnut Street (Tiedeman Avenue to 121' Avenue) - $1,700,000
• Greenburg Road (Shady lane to Tiedeman Avenue) - $1,500,000
• Burnham Street (Main Street to Hall Boulevard) - $2,100,000
Mr. Duenas stated an alternative or additional project is:
• Greenburg Road/Highway 99W/Main Street Intersection Improvements -
$2,250,000
Following additional discussion, The Council concurred to place the recommended list
of projects on the Council's October 26, Business Meeting for approval.
Councilor Wilson noted there had been a bridge over a ravine near the Progress
Quarry, which were constructed rapidly using pre-constructed arches. He asked Mr.
Duenas to look into that type of bridge.
7. COMMUNICATION PLAN UPDATE
• Staff Report
Liz Newton, City Administration, stated the staff report was included in the Council
Newsletter on October 15, in which she reviewed the City's Communication
Program. Responses in the Vision Task Force survey indicated the different ways
Tigard City Council Minutes Page 8
Meeting of October 19, 2004
residents kept informed about what is happening in the City. Staff has been
considering a change in the City Newsletter, "Cityscape," to include a column titled
"Heads Up," which will highlight issues that will be started in about one to two
months away, so citizens can be on the look-out for additional information about
issues. Some Issues Identifled so far include the Metro excise fee and the
comprehensive plan review process. If Interested, citizens can then find a way to get
involved In an issue. Ms. Newton noted that the survey results indicated that between
6 and 7% of the citizens use the city website as a source of information. There
continues to be a core audience watching council meetings on cable television.
Ms. Newton stated there has been a proposal for an Enhanced Community
Connector/Citizen Involvement Program for the City. The Community Assessment
Program (CAP) is concluding Its second year of operation. She then showed a map
showing the 40-plus CAP areas in the city, which was taken from the police grids.
The Idea for each area Is that each shares some commonality, such as a school, major
street, park, commercial area, etc. Each week, staff is assigned to walk through several
of the areas, talking with citizens and observing situations which need to be addressed.
There is a proposal to incorporate representatives from each area in the CAP program
into the Citizen Involvement program.
Ms. Newton noted areas with schools have a link to the surrounding neighborhood
area. As a property owner without children attending school (Fowler Middle School),
she personally understands the impacts schools have on neighborhoods. For her, the
issue is transportation system and the problems on Walnut. Other neighborhoods,
such as the one surrounding Cook Park or a major commercial area, have situations
unique to their neighborhood. There is intent to have citizens from each
neighborhood participate in the CERT program, who would help their neighbors
during an emergency, until the trained emergency personnel could respond.
Ms. Newton explained the Vision Task Force had proposed the Enhanced Community
Connector/Citizen Involvement Program and this proposal is on their meeting agenda
on November 18. They feel the program needs to be enhanced as soon as possible in
order to be in place by the time the City begins the comprehensive plan revision
process.
Councilor Sherwood noted Council has discussed this proposal at the Strategic
Planning meeting.
Ms. Newton asked if Council agreed to the concepts as outlined in her memo so that
it can be forwarded to the Vision Task Force on November 18.
The Council concurred with the proposal.
Tigard City Council Minutes Page 9
Meeting of October 19, 2004
> ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION CONCERNING BALLOT MEASURE 37
Councilor Woodruff indicated he had written additional language regarding the
resolution opposing Ballot Measure 37 and asked Council if they were interested in
hearing his proposal.
Mayor Dirksen asked if the Council was interested; no one indicated they were
Interested in further discussing the proposed resolution.
> DISCUSSION CONCERNING THE FIFTH TUESDAY CITIZEN FORUM
Councilor Sherwood noted the Council had discussed holding an open citizen forum
during months with a fifth Tuesday, no staff would attend except for the person
recording the meeting. The first month with five Tuesdays Is November. Council
indicated they would like to try this on November 30. She did not want citizens to be
yelling at the Council.
Councilor Moore stated he was concerned this not just be a griping session, but would
be offering suggestions and bringing new ideas.
The Council concurred to schedule the first Citizen Forum on November 30, 7 p.m.
at the Tigard Town Hail (or other location if the Town Hall Is not available due to
construction). No decisions would be made, and the Deputy City Recorder would
take notes.
Councilor Sherwood asked if this would conflict with anyone's attendance at the
National League of Cities. It was determined that Councilors were not scheduled to
leave until Wednesday, so this would not interfere with the forum.
Councilor Moore asked who would be able to participate. The Council concurred this
would be an open forum for residents of Tigard only.
8. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
u ;
J `1
a
Tigard City Council Minutes Page 10
Meeting of October 19, 2004
10. ADJOURNMENT
Councilor Woodruff moved, seconded by Councilor Sherwood, to adjourn the meeting, and
motion passed unanimously, and the meeting was adjourned at 9:27 p.m.
ca n, eputy ity ecor er
Ci
Tigard City Council Minutes
Meeting of October 19, 2004
Page 11
mayor's Agenda
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s).
If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda
item. Visitor's Agenda Items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set
for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager.
Times noted are estimated; It is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present
by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in
any order after 7:30 p.m.
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be
scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please
call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications
Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;
and
Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow
as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the
Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-
2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
COUNCIL AGENDA - OCTOBER 19, 2004 - page 1
AGENDA
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS AND WORKSHOP MEETING
OCTOBER 19, 2004
6:30 PM
1. TOUR PERMIT CENTER REMODEL PROJECT
Staff Report: Loreen Mills, Risk Management
6:50 PM
2. BUSINESS MEETING
1.1 Call to Order - City Council
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications 8L Lialson Reports
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non Agenda Items
7:00 PM
3. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OPPOSING STATE
BALLOT MEASURE 37
a. Staff Report, Liz Newton, City Administration
b. Public Comment
C. Council Discussion
d. Council Consideration - Resolution 04 -
Councilor. I move for adoption of the proposed Resolution 04-,
Councilor: I second the motion.
Mayor: Will the City Recorder please read the number and title of the Resolution.
City Recorder: (Reads as requested.)
Mayor. Is there any discussion?
Mayor
(after discussion): All of those in favor of adopting Resolution No. 04- , please say "aye. "
Mayor/Councilors:
Mayor: All of those opposed to adopting Resolution No. 04- , please say "nay. "
Mayor/Councilors:
Mayor. Resolution No. 04-- (is adopted or fails) by a (unanimous, or however votes
were split) vote.
Tie votes = failed motion.
COUNCIL AGENDA - OCTOBER 19, 2004 page 2
7:10PM WORKSHOP MEETING
4. JOINT MEETING WITH THE SENIOR CENTER BOARD
Staff Report: Loreen Mills, Risk Management
7:45 PM
S. BRIEFING ON METRO PROPOSAL FOR MANDATORY BUSINESS RECYCLING
Staff Report: Tom imdleke, Finance
BOOM
6. POTENTIAL PROJECTS FOR THE MSTIP TRANSPORTATION CAPITA
PROGRAM
Staff Report: Gus Duenas, Engineering
8:40 PM
7. COMMUNICATION PLAN UPDATE
Staff Report: Liz Newton, City Administration
8:55 PM
8. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
9:00 PM
9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
9:10 PM
10. ADJOURNMENT 1: ADM%CATHY%CCA12004%041019).DOC
COUNCIL AGENDA -OCTOBER 19, 2004 page 3
10/18/2004 11:04 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard
x## MULTI TX/RX REPORT xxx
xxx##xxxssssx#xxss#xsssx#xxxx:
TX/RX NO
PGS.
TX/RX INCOMPLETE
TRANSACTION OK
ERROR INFORMATION
3599
3
1 0915039686061
1 10115033712635
1 1115039687397
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Im 001
Oregonian
Valley
Regal Courier
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda Item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s).
If no sheet Is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda
item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set
for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager.
Times noted are estimated; It is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present
by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard
in any order after 7:30 p.m.
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be
scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please
call 503.639-4171., ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications
Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;
and
Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow
City of Tigard, Oregon
Affidavit of Notification
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
In the Matter of the Proposed Notification of Revised Agenda
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
City of Tigard )
1, (Jd , , t being first duly sworn (or affinned), by
oath (or affirmation), depose and say:
That I notified the following people/ organizations by fax of the agenda revision
of the City Council meeting on October 19. 2004 , with a
copy of the Notice of City Council Revised Ag 'tend a hereto attached and by
reference made a part hereof, on the / day of 0 c to 6-c-r'
200y
Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724)
Steve Lindsley, Regal Courier, (Fax No. 503-968-7397)
II Paige Parker, The Oregonian, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-968-6061)
Signature of Person who Perfo ed Notification
Subscribed and sworn (or affu-med) before me this day of
DCA~-)YjC , 20.0 .
OFFICIAL SEAL --~~wGf' 6~- l-l''
JILL M BYARS Signature of Notary Public for Oregon
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
COMMISSION NO. 381M
MY COMAMOVION EXPIRES JUNE 14, 2008
City of Tigard, Oregon
Affidavit of Posting
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
In the Matter of the Proposed Notice of Revised Agenda
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
City of Tigard )
I, 0 Oh r0~--- r. 4^ f 1,e ✓l , being first duly sworn (or affinned), by
oath (or affirmation), depose and say:
That I posted in Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, 'Tigard, Oregon, a
copy of the Notice of Revised Agenda for the City Council meeting of
October 19. 2004
with a copy of said Notice (Addition of Business
Meeting) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the
g t day of
D 6- , 20 0 ly
(Z')
Signature of Person who Performed Posting
Ve"
Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me this i $ day of
20.0-_.
40OFFICIAL. SEAL
JILL M BYARS
NOTARY PU XIC-OREGON
COMMMM MY COMMISSION 0WRES JUNE 14, 2008
Signature of Notary Public for Oregon
~rXit i h 7 6.( ~ .ti. X 4~~,y~ • SM L { j )«y t - r ~ ~ _
I,.. , T i3) ( y{
! S S 7 4
hY
e ..na*~:Ln er r+t i ur~y'E w ~T1 t r'~. r. t a 1 ~ t
n
w'aw r `ihF t r tiJ X:r : r; . t
V-Akpe
ra + _ r '~'tGAitD CITY COUNCtL,WOWCSHOP MF.M. G-STUDY SESSION
Y}~ October 19, 2004 - 6:30 p.m.
l r '
13125 SW Hal 8oulevat'4 TtgKd, Or"On
S 'S sloe is held h the Rid ROtat Creek ConferelCe Roan. Era' at the batik of Tam HER. The Council
i - w attend 'A Ix pan of dw nueft if dw tMtrrtlkr of attendees eocreds the capadq►
'die C=xg may Mitre dte Study Sessbn to the Tam Had.
Ruon
Y y
T k
• S i1W(S%WN ;
s; .
n,. , > ' N01tTHWEST MEDICAL TEAMS FUNDRAISING DINNER November 6:
RSVP'd Yes:
RSVP'd No: Tom Woodruff, Brian Moore
> ANNUAL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS/WELLNESS FAIR - Ocu)ber 20 11 AM -3 PM
in she La way Community Room
> ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
a. Calendar Review
• October 26: Oty Coma Busbuss Meedng - 6:30 pm
• November 2: FJocdon Day
• November 46: LOC Cale+e ce - Marriott Hotel downtown Pordand
f' . . November 9: City C mcl Business Meeting - 6:30 pm
• November 11: Veterans Day- - Clty Hal Closed
• November 16: City Council Wor cdm Meeting - 6:30 pm
• November 23: Oty Councl Business Meeting - 6:30 pm
November 25: Thardagiving • Oty Hal Closed
• November 26: City Hal Closed
November 29-December 4 Nadond League of Clues Conference- lndianapols
a,..r
Jzj;
r^ x L
tit c ~.•'YG r( k t R~ Y<~y u~y ~d" 'Gf..tt l r r r/ i ' -
~ `altY~~~~~~&~~5~~ .~~L?~i~k'.} `•i' 'yyp~+ v~~'I' x ik ;4' 1 } t .S.TF ~.4:' .1,
ti:. -T~YY'}f~ .4 fi~ sf,4,~5• 4Y t tr ~f `-i} `f Pr£'"T q,-s~ .;:tb
-~fx F~ ~fpr:tt~ cr .ik {~"a
,~}nij' a ~a3C r+ r~rsjtt 4t r ~'iS;3SAa. rA 5. r.k:~F<. ??Y r ` .:,Ayr'1 v~'{r~'" =y i;c a-Z; Kr
fY{y~ • ; ~ N~ Law ~ gov ertdns bodies t l meet In e~GlGhtive S1S310111n 1
684): ruin matars." of a r
~s ~ , f #gppr ~-RS' 1 ~
tp
wlilch k d _
~ rs 'e)I~ bah4
O'A ~ie PuiTa~a tocibpe~!'e and agents,
{a) Tci11 of phbik Ofiket:,
If the body ~ _sbas s~lieed ter aln P~~~o" - ~ r~'w" requests M
l K dti! .4"r h~`r7ti, a ~itl ~v~.YYM'r{~~ t~) ^.,•~,~"`~I of officers and Y ~~ToI~_' (unless NRrM
} t bane An.opep heatf.
to medical staff of a public hospltaL
To coroider matters P In this Instance.)
r 1 ' i ~~q.p~ • L9w negotiations. (NeWS media can be excluded
ty~ {
!i'560 (2) {e) - Reaf property tratssaction rhegodadons. Al
r S►1t.660 {Z) to • p records - to consider records that are ~mP ~ Oregon ftm
pMc hq*ctlon, These records are specficalh► idendlied
Rev>xd Stsahces.
Trade negotiations 6nvdit matters of trade or commerce in whkfi the
bodies.
192-660 (4) t~ • body compe:ktg Widr other+erning
p" Ilk.,
A,
- ft r consultation with counsel coocernft k1al rights and duties
192.b60 (2) (h) . Leggy Counsel
reprding current litigation or Ndgadon likely to be filed.
y 192,660 (2) (t) To review and eva>thate, Pursuant to standards, criteria, and poky directives
adopted by the governing body, the employment-rNated performance of the
j chief executive officer, a Public offker, employee or staff member unless the
afktted person regyescs an open hearing. The standards, cr feria and pocky
directives to be used in evaluating chief executive officers shall be adopted by
the goh►erft body in rrheedngs open to the public In which there has been an
opportunity fbr public comment. n negotiations under ORS Chapter 293 with
02.660.(2j (1) public -briestrnents - carry o acquisition, exchange or
private persons or ~ regarding proposed
liquidation of public htiyestnhents.
192.660_(2) (k)• Relates too heahh professional regulatory board.
142.660 (2) (1) Relates to State Landscape Architect Board. retesting to severity.:
19 2:660 (2) (rrh)- ' ltelatjes to the review and approval of. Programs
,
rx2
J
k v r~~,~iy, s.;x~tcr~ *4r ~t S~
T
Northwat Medical Teams
ows,
September 28, 2004
Craig & Jackie Dirksen
9131 SW Hill St
Tigard, OR 97223-6069
I am so grateful for your faithful and generous support for Northwest Medical Teams
over the years. With your help, our volunteers have brought hope to millions of people
suffering from poverty, disease, disaster, and war - around the world and here at home.
To celebrate our 25th ANNIVERSARY of life-saving work around the world
and a record-breaking year in 2004, please join us at our
"Doors of Hope" Celebration Dinner
7:00 pm, on Saturday, November 6
Held for the FIRST TIME in our own building,
our new Headquarters and International Distribution Center in Tigard, Ore.
At this exciting event, you' 11 join with hundreds of Northwest Medical Teams'
friends to hear inspiring firsthand stories from our volunteers about their work.
Come early and tour our permanent "Windows of Need, Doors of Hope" multi-
sensory-exhibit. You and your guests will experience the realities of poverty and human
need, without cven leaving the country.
And you'll be able to do all this while experiencing a fun evening filled with
good food and fellowship.
It's been good to have you with us in the past. Please consider sponsoring a.
table and sharing this inspiring evening with your friends. For $400, you can host a
table for 10 guests. Individual dinner tickets are $40. To reserve your space, we must
hear from you before October 22. Space is limited, so contact us soon. Call, e-mail or
use the enclosed card to reserve your seat(s) now.
You are an important part of our local Northwest Medical Teams family. We'd
love to have you join us for this. important event.
XED
OORS
OF
flupt
Dear Craig and Jackie,
Thanks for yo partraership, P.S. - To reserve your table or tickets, please
contact Julie Sies at 503-624-1023; Email
jsies(@,nwmti.org. Thanks.
Bas. Vanderzalm
President
NON~~WEST
MEDICAL TEAMS
0 IN.TERNATIO.NAL INC.
P.O. Box 10 - Portland, Oregon 97207 - 503-624-1000 - 800-959-4325 (HEAL)
www.nw.medicalteams.org
World Tour
Joanne
- Annual
lee Benefits/Wellness Fair °y" = ;
From: Sherrie Burbank
To: '
Date: 10/18/2004 7:10:38 AM
Subject: Annual Employee Benefits/Wellness Fair
It's happening this week Wednesday, October 20th, from 11:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. in the Library
Community Room.
Here's a brief overview of the events:
Naturopathic Services - Dr. Walsh will be here to once again provide a new health screening opportunity
for Interested of employees. She hydration in your i have electronic equipment
type of test is called a B o-lmpendance Assessment. fluids
and the level
Massage Therapy - Actually I was recently advised that we may have 2 massage therapists on-site for a
portion of the day. Sign-up sheets will be available at the fair. In addition, Mary Dalton from "Massage on
the Go" is providing an antioxidant screening. This is a test that measures the level of antioxidant activity
in your body.
Fitness - Curves for Women is graciously supplying bottled water and Tigard Fitness Center is presenting
information on the 5 components of fitness.
Credit Unions - Oregon Central and Oregon First Community
Retirement - The tradition continues ING is again providing freshly popped popcorn (yum). Our new sure representative from ICMA will be attending the Citys II a fair for the
ep ee so be a on s to top and meet her
have a first
if you haven't already had the opportunity. PERS w
Alternate Care - Chiropractic, naturopathic, and acupuncture providers will be on-site for this big event.
Meet representatives from EASE (our new EAP provider), and MSA-VEBA (our new medical savings
account provider). Our Life/LTD representative has only been with us for about a year and we rarely get
to see her so be sure to stop by and say "hi."
Of course, we will again have free health screenings including cholesterol, glucose, blood pressure, and
body fat/body mass.
as be here well as lflex our
ible spending and the CIS Healthy Benefits Program.
Representatives from CIS health/dental/vision coverage will
Finally snacks, door prizes, and lots of fun and information!
See you at the fair on Wednesday!!
Sherrie Burbank, Senior Human Resources Analyst
sherrie@ci.tigard.us.or
Phone: 503-718-2414
Fax: 503-718-2718
AGENDA ITEM # /
FOR AGENDA OF October 19, 2004
COUNCIL TOUR OF
PERMIT CENTER
Meet in the Red Rock Creek Conference
Room for a tour of the Permit Center
Remodel Project.
For more information, contact the City Recorder's Office at 503-639-4171
IL
a
J i
W
J
Entered into the Record on
By: J011/1 x1/71
MEMORANDUM Agenda Item#~~ Exhibit /
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON M M
TO: Jim Hendryx, Liz Newton, Bill M., Jane McGarvin
FROM: Joanne Bengtson jyl-"
DATE: October 19, 2004
SUBJECT: John Frewing Testimony
Yesterday John Frewing delivered a petition with attachments for Bill with the note "This is
my 2-min Tuesday night. Just so there are no surprises."
I then called Mr. Frewing and reminded him that October 19`"'s City Council meeting was a
workshop and would not have a visitor's agenda. He said "It'll hold 'till the 26 IN.
I am providing a copy of the materials to you for review. Mr. Frewing will appear on the
Visitor's Agenda at the October 26 Council Meeting.
tl.anr;arr+e4ne++o ~ Gewlrg bsUncny w~ois.aoc~a~aa
BEFORE THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 19, 2004
PETITION
Tigard resident John Frewing appears before the Tigard City Council on October 19, 2004 and
petitions such governing body to 1) acknowledge and then 2) initiate and approve an amendment to
its Comprehensive Plan, correcting an omission made in 1987 as part of Tigard's annexation of East
Metzger into the City.
BACKGROUND
The Tigard Comprehensive Plan was adopted by Ordinance 83-52 in November, 1983. It consists
of three parts: Volume 1, Resource Information, Volume 2, Findings, Policies & Implementation
Strategies and the Tigard Community Development Code (sec Findings, Vol 2, Policy 1-1). An
integral aspect of the Comprehensive Plan is the Comprehensive Plan Map, which is intended to be
the visual representative of the policies and adopted land uses. Where there are apparent
inconsistencies between the policies and the map, the policies shall control (see Vol 2, Introduction,
p 2.).
The Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been revised some 30 times since its adoption to be consistent
with legislative changes, statewide planning goals, regional plans and changed community
conditions.
In June of 1987, by Resolution 87-80, the Tigard City Council annexed East Metzger, generally
bounded by Taylor's Ferry Road on the north, SW 75th and SW 72id on the west, Spruce St. on the
south and SW 65 h and SW 68 h on the east. This annexation included about 9 acres straddling
South Fork Ash Creek between SW 74`h and SW 70a` (Tax Lots 300 and 400, WCTM ISI25DC,
with a street address of 9750 SW 74 h, owned by Ernest E and Elda H. Senn), hereafter termed the
Senn tract.
The annexation of Resolution 87-80 was approved by the Portland Area Metropolitan Local
Government Boundary Commission in its Final Order 2413 dated July 30, 1987. As stated in
Finding 8 of this Final Order, East Metzger, including the Senn tract, was previously governed by
the Metzger-Progress Community Plan (MPCP), an element of the acknowledged Washington
County Comprehensive Plan.
Finding 10 of Final Order 2413 noted at the outset that "land use and zoning designations on areas
annexed to cities will continue in effect unless, or until the City has by ordinance or provision
provided otherwise." In the governing MPCP, the Senn tract comprises ASC 10 (Area of Special
Concern), which is a land classification of the MPCP. In designating the Senn tract as ASC 10, the
MPCP notes "Development of structures and land divisions in this special wooded area shall be
planned and reviewed under the Type III review provisions of the Community Development Code.
Because of the importance of trees and other natural vegetation to the wildlife habitat and scenery
of the community, development shall be designed to minimize the area disturbed." The MPCP
further lists the Senn tract as a "Significant Natural Resource" and specifically highlights its
wildlife importance, stating that it has "sensitive habitats identified by the Oregon Department of
Fish and Wildlife, the Audubon Society, Urban Institute Habitat Map and forested areas coincident
with water areas and wetlands." Finding 10 of Final Order 2413 concludes that upon annexation,
the city would convert county plan designations to city plan designations which most closely
approximate the county designations.
THE OMISSION
The conversion of ASC 10 on the MPCP to the Tigard planning maps was never considered or
accomplished. The only map in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, which illustrates important
wildlife habitat is DIAGRAM V, which follows page I-40 in Volume 1 of the Tigard
Comprehensive Plan. It is this diagram, which should be corrected to show the Senn tract as an
important wildlife area.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AUTHORITY AND MANDATE FOR CORRECTION
Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Policy 3.4.1 tesThccity shal oncernl a esignabte, in acacia da~e~w ~u Goal
5, the following as areas of significant environmental
for their fragile character as habitats for plants, animal or acquatic life, or having endangered plant
or animal species, or specific natural features, valued for the need to protect natural areas."
Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Policy 1.1.1c states "The city shall ensure that the Tigard
Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code are kept current with the needs of the
community. In order to do this: 1. This plan shall be reviewed and updated at least every five
years."
CONCLUSIONS ts agree The City of Tigard has not implemented "important provisions of i ate the ment with hover ng
plan
to u
and its authorities in annexing East Metzger in 1987. Opportunity
maps has occurred every five years since 1987. Compliance with current Comprehensive Plan
policies requires correction of this deficiency.
The Senn tract today, and until acknowledged as otherwise in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, is
properly governed by requirements of other Tigard areas designated as significant natural areas,
including the requirements for sensitive lands contained in the TCDC.
Signed this 190i day of October, 2004
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR
503-245-5760
ifrewing@teleport.com
.ctrl
- -1%
CITY OF TIGMO, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 97-20
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY
OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "A" AND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED (NORTHEAST
IETZGER ZCA 07-05).
WHEREAS, a petition requesting annexation of an area described as Northeast
Metzger containing 180 signatures was submitted to the City of Tigard; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 1R" 1987 before the Tigard City
Council to consider the request; and
WHEREAS, by authority of ORS 199.490(1)(a) the Council of the City of Tigard
my initiate the annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
a
H
N
J_
_m
W
J
Section 1:
The Council, pursuant to ORS 199.490(1)(a)
hereby initiates
proceedings for annexation of the territory to
the City.
Section 2:
The Council hereby approves the proposed
annexation and
requests the Portland Metropolitan Area
Local Government
Boundary Commission to approve it.
Section 3:
The City Recorder is hereby directed to file
a certified copy
of the Resolution with the Commission at once.
PASSED
This day of 1987.
:
c
Mayor - City of Tigard
€ATMBT :
G(~h
,•Rorii
4r - City of Tiga
'reh/'82a9P
L sy. IT=-:, , .
X A
{
~
~
i
}
M1
\
4Y
rCF p
}~...r
,~,Y h 1q
+p
•
f
51('7
r
M
I
r
~D
EEF9 own
,a
'A
0
v
:1
PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
320 S. W. Stark (#530) - Portland, Oregon 97204 - Tel: 229-5307
FINAL ORDER
RE: BOUNDARY CHANGE PROPOSAL NO. 2413 - Annexation of territory
to the City of Tigard.
Proceedings on Proposal No. 2413 commenced upon receipt by the
Boundary Commission of a resolution from the City on June 24,
1987, requesting that certain property be annexed to the city.
The resolution meets the requirements for initiating a proposal
set forth in 199.490 particularly paragraph (a) of section (1).
Upon receipt of the petition the Boundary Commission published
and posted notice of the public hearing in accordance with ORS
199.463 and conducted a public hearing on the proposal on July
309 1987• The Commission also caused a study to be made on this
proposal which considered economic, demographic and sociological
trends and projections and physical development of the land.
The Commission reviewed this proposal in light of the following
statutory guidance:
11199.410 Policy. (1) The Legislative Assembly find that:
(a) A fragmented approach has developed to public ser-
vices provided by local government and such an approach has
limited the orderly development and growth of Oregon's urban
areas to the detriment of the citizens of this state.
(b) The programs and growth of each unit of local gov-
ernment affect not only that particular unit but also the
activities and programs of a variety of other units within
each urban area.
(c) As local programs become increasingly inter-
governmental, the state has a responsibility to insure
orderly determination and adjustment of local government
boundaries to best meet the needs of the people.
(d) Local comprehensive plans define local land uses but
may not specify which units of local government are to pro-
vide public services when those services are required.
(2) The purposes of ORS 199.410 to 199.519 are to:
Final Order - Page 1
(a) Provide a method for guiding the creation and growth
of cities and special service districts in Oregon in order to
prevent illogical extensions of local government boundaries;
(b) Assure adequate quality and quantity of public ser-
vices and the financial integrity of each unit of local gov-
ernment;
(c) Provide an impartial forum for the resolution of
local government jurisdictional questions; and
(d) Provide that boundary determinations are consistent
with local comprehensive planning, in conformance with state-
wide planning goals. However, when the proposed boundary
commission action is within an acknowledged urban growth
boundary, the state-wide planning goals shall not be applied.
The commission shall consider the timing, phasing and avail-
ability of services in making a boundary determination.
199.462 Standards for review of changes; territory which may
not be included in certain changes. (1) In order to carry
out the purposes described by ORS 199.410 when reviewing a
petition for a boundary change, a boundary commission shall
consider economic, demographic and sociological trends and
projections pertinent to the proposal, past and prospective
physical development of land that would directly or indi-
rectly be affected by the proposed boundary change and the
goals adopted under ORS 197.225."
The Commission also considered its policies adopted under Admin-
istrative Procedures Act (specifically 193-05-0nn to 193-05-015),
historical trends of boundary commission operations and deci-
sions, and past direct and indirect instructions of the State
Legislature in arriving at its decision.
FINDINGS
(See Findings in Exhibit "A" attached hereto).
REASONS FOR DECISION
(See Reasons for Decision in Exhibit "A" attached hereto).
Final Order - Page 2
ORDER
On the basis of the Pindings and Reasons For De cisiondalisted in
Exhibit "A", the Boundary Commission approved Boury Change
Proposal No. 2413 as modified on July 30, 1987.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED THAT the territtoranne desxec toribed in
the
Exhibit "B" and depicted onthfromattached dmap, be ate which is September
City of Tigard as of 45 days
14, 1987•
PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREASIOCAL GOVERNMENT
BOUNDARY COMMIS
DATE: ' I-cl-t'
BY
ha rman
Attest:
Final Order - Page 3
Exhibit A
Proposal No. 2413
FINDINGS
Based on the study and the Public Hearing the Commission found:
1. The territory proposed to be annexed contains 215.5 acres,
458 single family residences, a National'Guard armory, an
estimated population of 1104, and an assessed valuation of
$32,610,400.
2. In August 1986 the Commission approved the Metzger/Washington
Square annexation to Tigard (Proposal No. 2260). An election
was held and the proposal was voted down. In February, 1987
the Boundary Commission approved Proposal No. 2344 which
annexed a southern portion of the metzger community and
Washington Square. That Proposal was approved in an
election.
3. The City initiated this annexation proposal inresponse to the
petition for annexation from 180 area residents.
4. This proposal was initiated by a resolution of the Tigard
City Council. Proposals initiated by this kind of petition
area subject to a remonstrance. This means an election may
be held on the annexation. Such an election is not, however
automatic. If the proposed annexation is approved by the
Boundary Commission, it is not effective for 45 days. If
during the 45 days the Boundary Commission receives a
petition requesting an election signed by 100 registered
voters or 10% of the registered voters residing in the area
to be annexed, the proposed annexation would be subject to a
vote. The registered voters in the area proposed for
annexation would do the voting and a simple majority of those
voting would decide the issue. If the Boundary Commission
approves the proposed annexation and no remonstrance petition
is forthcoming within 45 days of the decision, the annexation
would become effective on the 45th day (or any subsequent day
up to one year later as specified by the Commission) and
there would be no election.
5. The Boundary Commission has three adopted policies. The
first of these policies states that the Commission sees cit-
ies as the primary providers of Urban Services. Recognizing
that growth of cities may cause financial problems for
districts, the Commission states in the second policy that
the Commission will help find solutions to those problems.
The third policy states that the Commission may approve
Final Order - Page 4
Exhibit A
Proposal No. 2413
illogical annexations in the short term if these lead to log-
ical service arrangements in the long-term.
6. Most of the area consists of detached single-family
dwellings. Approximately 22 vacant lots are within the area
and two lots are identifed as potential greenway/wildlife
sanctuary.
7. The territory is within the boundary of Metro and within the
regional urban growth boundary.
8. The territory is designated Urban on the acknowledged County
Comprehensive Plan. The area is covered by the Metzger-
Progress Community Plan. This Plan, which covers an area
larger than the area proposed for annexation, was adoptedThe
the Board of County Commissioners on December 27, 1983•
Metzger-Progress Community Plan has been reviewed by LCDC and
found to be in compliance with the state-wide planning goals.
It is considered to be an element of the County Comprehensive
Plan.
The Metzger/Progress Community Plan identifes the area as Low
ntsnlwith annsof SW 67th and Oak Street, the location of the National Guard
armory.
9. Washington County has recently reviewed its role in service
provision in its County 2000 program. The County is
proposing a service delivery system which clearly
distinguishes between municipal and county-wide services in
attempt to achieve tax fairness and expenditure equity in the
provision of public services. It is County policy that all
tax payers should pay for those services which are of County-
wide benefit.
,I 10. The City of Tigard has an acknowledged City Limits plan. ORS
215.130 provides that "land use and zoning designations on
areas annexed to cities will continue in effect unless, or
until.the City has by ordinance or provision provided other-
wise." Furthermore the City of Tigard and Washington County
have entered into an Urban Planning Area Agreement the
effective date of which is September 9, Urban
Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) is considered to be a part of
both the County's and the City's adopted Comprehensive Plans.
The UPAA sets out an "Active Planning Area" within which the
assumes City " in responsibility which the or Coland use unty agrees an to planning,
Area of Interest coordinate
Final Order - Page 5
Exhibit A
Proposal No. 2413
its planning due to the potential impacts on the adjacent
City. This proposal falls within the rules for the Tigard
"Area of Interest". The Interestngporertint tion of theaUPAAnts are
from Section
4. The consider requests for annexations in the
'Area of Interest' subject to the following:"
CITY may
"A. The CITY shall not require annexation of lands in the
Area of Interest asda condition" to the provision of
urban services
"B. Annexations by the CITY within the Area of Interest
shall not ecomplete asthedislandsannexation.declares its
intent
"C. The CITY agrees in principle to a plebiscite or other
representative means for annexation in the
Area, which
Metzger/Progress Community Planning
includes Washington Square, within the CITY Tae CITY
Interest. NOT CONTRARY TO THE FOREGOING,
RESERVES ALL OF ITS RIGHTS TO ANNEX AND ACKNOWLEDGES
THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS TO ANNEX TO
isE)ISED STATUTES. (Cap-
THE CITY PURSUANT for emphasis.)"
italization
"D. Upon annexation of land within the area of Interest
to the CITY, the CITY agrees to convert COUNTY plan
designations to CITY plan designatioprovisih most
closely approximate the density, use standards of COUNTY designations. Furthermore, the
CITY agrees -to maintain this designation for one year
ag unless both
after the effective date of annexation
the CITY and COUNTY Planning
time of annexation that the COUNTY d esignation tis II
outdated and an amendment may b
one year period is over.
The City of Tigard. has conducted a municipal Services Study
covering the area proposed for annexation. The study
describes the area, discusses annexation, service provision,
expenditure requirements and revenue projections. On July
14, 1986, the City of Tigard adopted an Urban Services pPolicy
rovide
declaring its willingness to plan and ultimately p
urban services in an area around the current City limits.
The area proposed for annexation falls within the territory
covered by this policy.
Final Order - Page 6
PROPOSAL N0.2413
AREA TO BE I
ANNEXED I I H H I I I.c.f. I Id ~ al-L. L
T~R0f3
)-U L PARCEL A
Q
FIGURE 2d
.T • ~ • FIGURE ~ 2b s .
in,
i::• :~L : rr:.'
FIGURE '2c:
T'n
,f
' PARCEL B
FIGURE 2j FIGURE 2e: FIGURE 2a
] t~ • i~~~ 25 0 ~
36 I
4 l 3
i 3L
'FIGURE Z;'
J 11 FIGURE 2f
fTft[T
FIGURE 2h r
r}}[(T FIGURE • 2g
a FRS • : Tigard
PROPOSAL NO. 2413
CITY OF TIGARD
AMEXATION
FIGURE 2 INDEX MAP
METZGER1111111PROGRESSv
COMMUNITY PLAN
•COMMUNiTY PLAN OVERVIEW*
Metzger-Progress Planning Area encompasses
two substantially developed urban
communities in unincorporated Washington
County - one historically a residential
community, the other a younger community of
primarily commercial activities. 'Old
Metzger% the residential community, is
conceived as generally east of Greenburg
and Oleson Roads and west of the county
line, between Taylors Ferry Road and
Pacific Highway and Highway 217. Hall
Boulevard and Locust Street form the main
axis for neighborhood commercial activity
in Metzger. Progress, Including Washington
Square, lies west of Greenburg and Oleson
Roads. Most of this area is developed as a
fairly intensive regional commercial
center.
The development approach planned for the
Metzger portion of the Planning Area is
intended to protect the integrity of the
existing, primarily low density,
residential neighborhood, while
accommodating a variety of housing options.
Some development is also planned to provide
for neighborhood shopping, employment and
recreation opportunities which are readily
rccessible to Metzger residents. Moreover,
he use of public transit, and bike/
'edestrian ways is encouraged in order to
educe the number and length of trips
esidents must make to work and shop by
utvrnobile. Together, the Community P!an
'ements foster development which moves
,is area toward the goal of the balanced,
!11 serviced community prescribed in the
'mprehensive Framework Plan.
e development approach for the Progress/
chington Square portion of the Planning
!a is continued development as an
!nsive regional, primarily commercial,
ter. Progress will continue to be
(loped as a diversified and compact
:er of commercial and high density
dential uses. Washington Square and
ounding uses are intended to continue
loping as a regional commercial center
appropriate supportive uses.
-itation of the uses in this area are
,ded to be ton--4
protect what is unique about the
Metzger-progress c
at the ommunity Plan Area, and
same time connect its land uses with
the surrounding metropolitan community.
General Design Elements are first listed
which describe policy direction for the
whole Planning Area. Then, the land uses
planned for Metzger-Progress are
characterized for six subareas and design
elements specific to each subarea are
presented. All of the design elements in
this Plan, both general to the Planning
Area and specific to subareas shall guide
land use In the Metzger-Progress Area.
Areas of Special Concern are also defined
in this Community Plan. Some sites within
the Planning Area present special
resources, opportunities or problems to the
Metzger and Progress community. In such
cases, a creative design approach is called
for to resolve development conflicts and/or
assure consideration of important
amenities, such as proper circulation and
open space. Special policies for analysis
or design, as well as directions for the
public review process are given where these
special areas are noted. Fifteen Areas of
Special Concern are mapped and numbered on
the Community Plan Map. /
General Des- n Elements
1 In the design of new dPvelcmment•.
floodplains, drainage hazard areas,
streams and their tributaries, riparian
zones and wooded areas, steep slopes,
scenic features, and Powerline easements
and rights-of-way shall be:
11 Noise reduction
incorporated into
developments loci
arterials and Ma
reduction measur,
vegetative buffer:
backs and structu
;uch as insulation
windows away fro,
12 Proposed new com,
Boulevard, Greenb
Road and Pacific I
evaluated against t
to discourage strip
development. Desi
features outlined it
Development Code !
orientation, parking
landscaping which n
detrimental effects
development.
13 Where the impact of
associated with comr
uses adjacent to res
not meet the standar
Development Code, ti
development shall be
hours of operation.
14 A height limitation of
apply to all developm,
Boulevard south and e
9leson Roads.
15
New development shall
determined to be appr,
development review pre
for road extensions an,
indicated in Washington
Transportation Plan anc
Plan. New developmen
subject to conditions se
County's growth manag(
public facility standards
development review proc
used to accent, define, or separate 16
areas of differing or similar residen-
tial densities and differing planned
land uses;
preserved and protected to enhance the
economic, social, wildlife, open space,
scenic, recreation qualities of the
community; and
Transportation planning
sensitive to the integrity
residential community.
shall provide that statior
integrated with surroundi
and other modes of traff
pedestrian. Truck traffi
traffic to and from regio
crYnmo..•:-I
of the flood plain
be permitted without
improvements to the
which have been prepared
didlife biologist.
ge capacity shall be
velopment for the portion
ve the flood plain and
,way 217 shall have access
3th Avenue and shall be
!red from the traffic
y 217.
for development on this
e for open space for
e flood plain portion
vith the appropriate
managing agency, in order
such as practicable of
ng Ash Creek.
ation study shall be
e Greenburg Road - Oak
y 217 intersection area by
ie resulting design plan
rculation in this area
following nhiectivet:
th the County
t Plan, Oak Street west of
d shall be used for local
circulation only, not for
1c.
A mixture of land uses within this Area
shall be encouraged, consistent with the
Code. Special attention shall be given
to shared access, orientation and signage
with minimum detrimental impact on
surrounding low density residential uses.
2 Parcels which include the forested land
along the east fork of Ash Creek comprise
Area of Special Concern 10. Development
of structures and land divisions in this
special wooded area shall be planned and
reviewed under the Type III review
provisions of the Community Development
Code. Because of the importance of trees
and other natural vegetation to the
wildlife habitat and scenery of the com-
munity, development shall be designed to
minimize the area disturbed.
)ordered by the City of
e Street on the south, Hall
ishington Drive on the west,
-Garden Home Community
the north, and the county
Portland or the east.
area is designated low
al, R-5.
Development approval shall not permit
removal of more than fifty percent of the
mature standing trees (six inch diameter
or greater) unless demonstrated that
removal is necessary to permit
development of the site at the planned
density. This demonstration shall be
reviewed by the review authority to
ensure that the applicant has vsed th-
flexibility provided in Planned
Development provisions of the Code to
minimize removal. Development design
and clearing for structures shall provide
for maximum retention of larger trees.
No additional street crossings of the
stream, except for SW 74th Avenue, shall
be permitted within this Area of Special
Concern. Since the portion of this site
east of SW 74th Avenue is within a
park-deficient area, public open space
use of the part along the creek shall be
considered during the development review
process, in coordination with the
appropriate park/open space managing,'
agency.
3 A number of wooded lots south of Ventura
Avenue are designated Area of Special
Concern 11. Development of structures
and land divisions within this Area shall
be planned and reviewed under the Type
III review provisions of the Community
Development Code. Because of the
importance of trees and other natural
vegetation to the wildlife habitat and
scenery of the community, development
shall be designed to minimize the area
disturbed.
Specific Design Elements:
1 Parcels designated for medium density,
R-15, residential uses west of SW 74th
Avenue and Pacific Highway make up Ar
of Special Concern 14. Development of
structures and land divisions within this
special area shall be planned and
reviewed under the Type III review
provisions of the Community Developmen
Code. Such development 'shall account
adequate acces to all portions of this
property and shall not result in an
overload of local residential streets.
2 Several parcels north of Pfaffle and we
of SW 03rd Avenue make up Area of
Concern 15. Development of structure:
and land divisions within this Area shal
be planned and reviewed under the
Type III review provisions of the
Community Develoment Codte. Because
the importance of trees and other natul
vegetation to the wildlife habitat and
scenery of the community, development
shall be designed to minimize the area
disturbed.
11
removal of more than fift+ percent of
mature standing trees (sixllinch diamet(
or greater) unless demonstrated that
removal is necessary to permit
1 development of the site at the planned
density. This demonstration shall be
reviewed by the review authority to
ensure that the applicant has used the
flexibility provided in Planned
Development provisions of the Code to
minimize removal. Development design
clearing for structures shall provide fc
maximum retention of larger trees.
The access and circulation system shal
provide for no crossings of, the stream
Since the site is on-the fringe of a
park-deficient area, the development
proposal shall include consideration of
dedicated public open space, coordinat
with the appropriate park/open space
managing agency.■
Development approval shall not permit
removal of more than fifty percent of the
mature standing trees (six inch diameter
or greater) unless demonstrated that
removal is necessary to permit
ess for commercial uses
ided on both sides of
-ad, including Lincoln
ington Square and
nd future establishments.
L
AREA OF SPECIAL CONCERN
areas demgnated nn the trxr
S.C. 1 vv' Lave specific tlesig, e
within the plan text addr:•ss.
itwrF- special concerns atu ut
NOTE: A.S.C.4 HAS BEEN DELETE[
BY 84-109M MAY 23, 191
SUBAREA
PrAFF LE J
r
CITY OF
PORTLAND
J u
rrq
[[1Mrr
1 t ~ -
to 9AGI
-ct •R
A1.0-i r
a ~ , S rWrJrut _
/L . ,7
i L Rxr[f
VICINITY MAP
d ~u'u'N
NN°~ mEr
a~L
ro~
m~
>
ro V1
U u ro 4
w
6! •
p
N
ro
E
.n
`
(D OO
C.
~o
~ uOQ~
c
O
N a
c Q LL_
E
O
r'a
u W
- i
N
5 ro_
A
V
m 4,
_
4
N y` d i V
w .C i
t m 5 an <
c> x
a c$ ~
ro Cl O
C
t
ro
C
u
.
_ „ C
y Y ~i ^
O
C
C o0
=
:Y N Z N
00
r-
r N N • A ro
N N
a
0 0•~-c ca
u
m
~
S
at
N = r
.o N
c Iv `~ccc ro
~ c _m
O=
U d
y c 0
u
O O n m
'
tt M
r ur
,0
ar•
- v c
U
41
O
U
67
~
v
m
ro `
N .
m
o c
U N
C 61
C
C 0,3
U O0 r
c '
ro v c d d
7 d~ v
~ >,e ro y
N
a
c
u d u
1 O
. O ~ E
p
p
7 N
> O o
CJ m <
> ~ v
~ ~
ro N `0 C .
N
~ ro
N ~
O ~
'0 a
m a c
'a Q. U
a o
v d O ro
ro
i U Z
r m o a>i
> N
Z
0
ro
v
ro
c
c
ro
M.
Ll >
C ~
3: a a E
ro ro
ro~EEC
V ro (U V
> a
a = "
x E E
L C C
F- E
O O .OE
fur _u
U . U
C ~ d N •C
~ c a c
° m ax,
O Cl.
u v c
t a Q v ro
f' ~ p -p a
Ou.
i
1
7
i
ri.
CO
U
cc
Z)
U
Z _
`/yc
U J
- Cr LL Cr
vJ 7
'wit-
ILL E[lg jj 1. - V~Li
U~,~ 'r
l~
rJr
Z_
O •
r l I\
t
- -
3W
¢
2 a-- r
W
W
L,
Pan
O
O
U - =
< Q a -
W 2 N
y
s
U
3 "
Q a
a
3- O
W
W
-
_
-
W
S
:
U
Z
a~
~
W
rn
a
a
I
AGENDA ITEM # 3
FOR AGENDA OF October 19, 2004
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE: RESOLUTION, OPPOSING STATE BALLOT MEASURE 37
PREPARED BY: LIZ NEWTON [A V DEPT HEAD OK ` CITY MGR O
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL.
Should the Tigard City Council approve the Resolution Opposing State Ballot Measure 377
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached resolution in opposition to State Ballot Measure 37.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On Tuesday, October 12, 2004, Council directed staff to prepare a resolution to officially oppose State Ballot
Measure 37.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
None
ATTACHMENT LIST
Resolution
Resolutions from the cities of Corvallis, Medford, Oregon City, and Ashland.
FISCAL NOTES
3 I
i:ladmtrcwYrtioml212 appoiming ju mcguvio dry rcwrder doc&=04
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL OPPOSING STATE BALLOT
MEASURE 37.
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council supports existing federal and state constitutional provisions
to compensate property owners for their loss when a taking occurs; and
WHEREAS, the "Tigard City Council believe that cities should have the authority to balance the
rights of property owners and the rights of residents if required to go beyond current federal and
state constitutional requirements to compensate property owners for a loss when a taking occurs;
and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 would undermine local zoning authority; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 would create substantial potential takings liability beyond the state and
federal constitution that would include issues such as: wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat, buffer
zones, access denials, recharge areas, flood plains, geologically hazardous areas, shorelines, open
spaces, view corridors, environmentally sensitive areas; and actions such as denying permits, re-
zones, subdivisions and variances; and
WHEREAS, because cities are financially constrained, the Tigard City Council believes that any
requirement to compensate property owners beyond the current constitutional standard
requirement should include a new state or local funding mechanism which is absent in Measure
37; and;
ti
WHEREAS, Measure 37 provides an alternate waiver provision that would increase
infrastructure costs when a city waived a regulation that puts additional unplanned capacity on
public facilities, transportation system improvements, curbs, sidewalks, open space requirements,
parks; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 creates significant costs for claims assessment; including ownership
research, costs of an appraisal that makes multiple value determinations, staff reports, assessment
of impacts to neighbors, assessments of collateral impacts to existing infrastructure investments,
legal assistance and additional public hearings; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 could create a loss of property tax revenue to cities by having
neighboring property owners demanding a reduction in their assessed values if an unplanned
development were allowed next to their property;
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -
Page 1 .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Tigard City Council opposes the passage of
Measure 37; and:
SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council urges the Oregon Legislature to review the State's
current land use laws and look for common sense approaches to Oregon's
future planning; and
SECTION 2: The Tigard City Council urges:ill Tigard residents to study the measure and
its impacts and vote NO on Measure 37.
SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage.
PASSED: This day of , 2004.
Craig Dirksen, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jane Iv:cGarvin, Deputy City Recorder
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -
Page 2
RESOLUTION 2004-22
Minutes of the August 16, 2004, Corvallis City Council meeting continued.
Griffiths
A resolution submitted by Councilor
WHEREAS, the Corvallis City Council supports existing federal and state constitutional
provisions to compensate property owners when land is needed for public purposes; and
WHEREAS, the Corvallis City Council supports the existing land use system in Oregon
established many years ago under SB 100; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 would undermine Oregon's Land use laws and local zoning authority;
and enforcement
WHEREAS, Measure 37 provides that "Governments must pay
buPeres es owners, :tanffordo to het local
when certain land use restrictions reduce property value" government decide when to pay and when to allow landowners to violate the law it would require
new processes for assessing value and land use code requirements and appeals creating delays in
development; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 creates significant costs for claims assessment; including ownership
research, costs of an appraisal that makes multiple value determinations, staff reports, assessments
of impacts to neighbors, assessments of collateral impacts to existing infrastructure investments,
legal assistance and additional public hearings; and
WHEREAS, the City of Corvallis is financially constrained, and Measure 37 does not include a
new state or local funding mechanism for increased staff requirements or payments to property
owners; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 provides for a waiver provision that would increase infrastructure
costs if the City were to waive a regulation that puts additionalplan pa on public
facilities, transportation system improvements, parks & open sp requirements;
WHEREAS, Measure 37 would not require property owners to compensate government for
governmental actions that increase property value; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 could create a loss of property tax revenue to Corvallis by having
neighboring property owners demanding a reduction of their assessed values if an unplanned
development were allowed next to their property; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corvallis City Council opposes the passage of
Measure 37; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Corvallis City Council urges all Corvallis citizens to vote
NO on Measure 37. o . n
uounUw i / i
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the foregoing resolution was adopted, and the Mayor
thereupon declared said resolution to be adopted.
Page I of 1 - Resolution in opposition of Measure 37
Joanne Bengtson - Medford City Council Resolution 10.7.doc
Medford City Council Resolution
Opposing Measure 37 (Takings)
WHEREAS, cities support existing federal and state constitutional provisions to
compensate property owners for their loss when a taking occurs; and
WHEREAS, cities believe that they should have the authority to balance the rights of
property owners and the rights of residents if required to go beyond current federal and
state constitutional requirements to compensate property owners fcr a loss when a taking
occurs; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 would undermine local zoning authority; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 would create substantial potential takings liability beyond the
state and federal constitution that would include issues such as: wetlands, fish and
wildlife habitat, buffer zones, access denials, recharge areas, flood plains, geologically
hazardous areas, shorelines, open spaces, view corridors, environmentally sensitive areas,
and actions such as denying permits, rezones, subdivisions and variances; and
WHEREAS, because cities are financially constrained, cities believe that any
requirement to compensate property owners beyond the current constitutional standard
requirement should include a new state or local funding mechanism which is absent in
Measure 37; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 provides an alternate waiver provision that would increase
infrastructure costs when a city waived a regulation that puts additional unplanned
capacity on public facilities, transportation system improvements, curbs, sidewalks, open
space requirements and parks; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 creates significant costs for claims assessment, including
ownership research, costs of an appraisal that makes multiple value determinations, staff
reports, assessments of impacts to neighbors, assessments of collateral impacts to
existing infrastructure investments, legal assistance and additional public hearings; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 could create a loss of property tax revenue to cities by having
neighboring property owners demanding a reduction of their assessed values if an
unplanned development were allowed next to their property;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Medford City Council oppose the
passage of Measure 37; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Medford City Council urge the citizens of the
City of Medford to actively oppose the passage of Measure 37.
Page 1
I
CITY COMMISSION OF OREGON CITY
RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION 1O BALLOT MEASURE 37
September WHEREAS, we support existing federal and state constitutional provisions to
compensate property owners when land is needed for public purposes; and
WHEREAS, we support the existing land use system in Oregon established in 1973
by Senate Bill 100; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 would undermine Oregon's Land Use laws and local
zoning authority; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 would create potential takings liability beyond that required issues
plains, and
such State and Federal zones, access denials, aqufererecha ge areas, floodands,
wildlife habitat, buffer
geologically hazardous areas, shorelines, open spaces, view corridors, environmentally
sensitive areas, and would include actions such as denying permits, re-zoning,
subdivisions and variances; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 provides that 'governments must owners, or forgo
' but creates no
enforcement, when certain land use restrictions reduce and when vallueallow landowners to
standards to help local government decide when to pay
violate the law; and uire the City of
new WHEREAS,
land fuse grequirements a drappeals, the eby crreat ng
assess nq value37
processes for
delays in development; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 creates significant administrative costs for claims aisal assessment for Oregon determinations, ltt staff ownership research, cos of an
assessments of impactsrto ne ghbors,
makes multiple value
assessments of collateral impacts to existing infrastructure investments, legal assistance
and additional public hearings; and
WHEREAS, the City of Oregon City is financially constrained and Measure 37 does
requirements or for
not include a new state ownel bfunding mechanism for increased staff eyond that currently required by state and federal
owners
compensating property
constitutional standards; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 requires a city to waive a regulation even though a waiver facilities
ion of such regulationputs
curbs, sidewalks, open space equrelme ts, he ghtrequiirem nts,
system improvements,
parks, and even though such a waiver would increase infrastructure costs; an
WHEREAS, Measure 37 does not require property owners to compensate
i Joanne Bengtson - Oregon City RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO BALLOT MEASURE 37.doc Page 2
government for governmental actions that increase property value; and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 could create a loss of property tax revenue to Oregon City
by having neighboring property owners demanding a reduction of their assessed values if
an unplanned development were allowed next to their property; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Commission of Oregon City
opposes Measure 37; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Commission of Oregon City urges all
Oregon City citizens to vote NO on Measure 37.
City of Ashland RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-_
RESOLUTION OPPOSING STATE INITIATIVE BALLOT MEASURE 37
Recitals:
A. Cities support existing federal and state constitutional provisions to compensate property
owners for their loss when a taking occurs; and
B. Cities believe that they should have the authority to balance the rights of property owners
and the rights of residents if required to go beyond current federal and state constitutional
requirements to compensate property owners for a loss when a taking occurs; and
C. Measure 37 creates significant costs for claims assessment; including ownership research,
costs of an appraisal that makes multiple value determinations, staff reports, assessments of
impacts to neighbors, assessments of collateral impacts to existing infrastructure
investments, legal assistance and additional public hearings; and
D. Measure 37 could create a loss of property tax revenue to cities by having neighboring
property owners demanding a reduction of their assessed values if an unplanned
development were allowed next to their property; and
E. Measure 37 would undermine local zoning authority; and
F. Measure 37 provides an alternate waiver provision that would increase infrastructure costs
when a city waived a regulation that puts additional unplanned capacity on public facilities,
transportation system improvements, curbs, sidewalks, open space requirements, parks; and
G. Measure 37 would create substantial potential takings liability beyond the state and federal
constitution that would include issues such as: wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat, buffer
zones, access denials, recharge areas, flood plains, geologically hazardous areas, shorelines,
open spaces, view corridors, environmentally sensitive areas; and actions such as denying
permits, re-zones, subdivisions and variances;
THE CITY OF ASHLAND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. We oppose the passage of Measure 37; and
SECTION 2. We encourage residents to study the Measure and its impacts and vote against this
as a strategy for addressing land use concerns raised by its proponents
SECTION 3. This resolution takes effect upon signing by the Mayor.
This resolution was read by title only in accordance with Ashland Municipal Code Section
2.04.090 duly
PASSED and ADOPTED this day of , 2004:
Barbara Christensen, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this day of , 2004:
Alan W. DeBoer, Mayor
Reviewed as to form:
Michael W. Franell, City Attorney
Measure 37: Do owners deserve compensation for land-use laws? Yes: Compensation is 1... Page 1 of 3
Entered into the Record on e lw
By: 60-N'41 Agenda Item#:~__ Exhibit vg-- /
auIft "_01a www.registergo ari.eoo engele, eregi
HOT LINKS: UO Football IUO Hoops ISearch IFront Page INW NowIWire IR-G Free Trial ISite MapIForms IFeedt
FINDERS: classifieds IEvents IRestaurants IWebCamsICity InfolWeb Directory IAutos IHomes l)obsICoupor
ADS/DELIVERY: Place ClassifledlR-G AdslSpecial SectionslOrder R-GlDeliver R-GIDelivery IssueslNIE
NEWS
l ga!
Iyatlon/World
Busm
start home delveryl
524[u
puskJaskatball
October 6, 2004
Duck Football
G21%.X [a
PreQ In~rx
Measure 37: Do owners deserve compensation
s
01
EOU
0
for land-use laws? Yes: Compensation is long-
12
M
200m
iece of plan
lost
p
NOW
(hourly)
B.zVO .«Arshlye
By Bob Smith
30J.0y-4bsuaoc
Index
Search
Forward
Opponents of Measure 37, the property owner
'
°r
s
compensation measure, ignore the history of Oregon
THE WEEK
unique planning system when they describe Measure Printer-
Considering the
`
dl
i
Sunda
y
ng.
frien
37 as an attack on land-use plann
day
mo-
intent of Gov. Tom McCall and the Legislature in version
rue
sday
Tue
Wednesday
passing Senate Bill 100 in 1973, nothing could be
Thursday
further from the truth. I should know, I was there.
Friday
at rd y
The passage of Measure 37 would complete the land-
WEATHER
use package that the Oregon Legislature adopted but
AP for Eugene
only partially implemented in 1973.
NWS for Eugene
AccuWeather for
Eugene
As a state senator in 1973, I participated in the deliberations leading
state l
to the passage of Senate Bill 100, which created our land-use system.
Passcams-
Road reports
school, other
Many realized that SB 100 would cause economic harm to Oregon
Closures
l
property owners, though none of us could have imagined the extent of
es
Tide tab
those impacts or the changes that would be made in subsequent
INFO
years to the original idea. Our current land-use system bears little
CITY
Eu en
resemblance to what was adopted in 1973, and the economic
Sprinafield
devastation to which some unfortunate landowners have been
cottage Grove
subjected is far beyond what we expected.
Florence
N w o
Bend
Because we knew that SB 100 would reduce some property values,
Corvooallt
Senate Bill 849 was introduced. SB 849 was similar to Measure 37,
Roseburg
and required compensation for property regulations that would be
ADVERTISING
implemented under the new planning scheme. McCall and I supported
AdConnect
Place classified
SB 849, and his staff indicated that land-use planning would not work
http://www.registerguard.com/news/2004/10/06/ed.col.yesown37.1006.html
10/19/2004
Measure 37: Do owners deserve compensation for land-use laws? Yes: Compensation is 1... Page 2 of 3
view classifieds
without the compensation that the bill provided.
Home & Garden
AAdv Kise
Unfortunately, SB 849 was held up in committee, jeopardizing
SB 100 was changed to
Display
Adyertw
passage of both bills. To break the logjam,
reate a committee to "make recommendations to the Legislative
Rate te cards
Online ad
c
Assembly on the implementation of a program for compensation by
this state for the value of any loss
hi
i
index
n
t
the public to owners of land w
of use of such lands resulting directly from the imposition of any
N9VA2D r
Ads online
zoning, subdivision or other ordinance or regulation regulating or
Online
ll
restricting the use of such lands."
venr
Ad de
GM L FIQM
Match.com
In other words, SB 100 created a committee to recommend a
lations that took their
patina
program to compensate landowners for regu
Volunteer
Link
property values.
TO DO
Although a committee was formed, due to political bickering, it never
nd the compensation
Mans
k
made recommendations to the Legislature, a
idered to be a vital component of
Lin
s
~NebCams
provisions McCall and I cons
tewide land-use planning were never adopted. The results have
t
Bovies
Events
a
s
been predictable. For 31 years, land-use regulations have destroyed
R
property values, ruined retirement dreams and bankrupted
C uraDA
Restaurant
businesses.
vi w
Tir, sediOn
TV listInos
Measure 37 requires government to share the burden of the planning
of SB 100. Not only is that fair, it is
tes the intent
l
S
-
e
system and comp
what McCall and the Legislature wanted in 1973.
OTHER LINK
Site Mao
EAQ
Because it protects property owners' investments, Measure 37 creates
d stabilizes our planning system. Contrary to opponents'
Srimewatch
a
PaR
certainty an
Measure 37 will reduce litigation and provide a way to make
claims
o
ad re reports
Ro
,
claims that is fair to property owners and government.
30-Dpy
rs2tumnis
archiv :
Opponents who cry that Measure 37 is expensive ignore the fact that
Bellamy
Godbold
the current costs of the system fall squarely on those whose property
Stahlbera
is regulated. Opponents may want someone else to pay for
We1rh
regulations they find desirable, but that is hardly fair.
oL tterv
Support Services
Newspaper In
Measure 37 also contains many exemptions to protect neighborhoods.
Education
Measure 37 does not apply to public health and safety
For example
Crime Watch
Migh.com
,
laws, nuisance abatement ordinances or private restrictions such as
the covenants found in nearly every subdivision.
SPECIAL
Mission to
Measure 37 recognizes that nobody has the right to pollute or create a
Ad
Africa
Thurston
nuisance.
Tragedy
Trouble
Because Measure 37 restores fairness and protects homes, businesses
set
Waters
casualties of
and neighborhoods, it has earned the support of urban and rural
Ne
Ad
Abuse
organizations, including the Oregon Cattleman's Association, the
We
We
Oregon Homeowners Association, the Oregon State Grange, the
l Federation of Independent Business,
Fra
Oregon chapter of the Nationa
the Oregon Family Farm Association, county farm bureaus, the
of
OF Gr(
Taxpayers Association of Oregon, Citizens for a Sound Economy,
Tr.
Tr
numerous state and local officials and many others.
Ad,
In
http://Wwwr.registerguard.com/news/2004/10/06/ed.col.yesonm37.1006.html
10/19/2004
Measure 37: Do owners deserve compensation for land-use laws? Yes: Compensation is 1... Page 3 of 3
If our land-use system is to survive, we cannot continue to unfairly
place the entire costs of the system on a small minority. Fairness is
what Measure 37 is all about, and that's why I support it.
Bob Smith, R-Medford, served four terms in the state House of
Representatives, three terms in the state Senate and seven terms in
the U.S. House of Representatives.
. November 2004 general election index
plo or TransuQt3
R~ai~er yard Mevtisnaoer
Home delivery Just $1.50 a week. Save up Eugene/Springfield, Lane Coe Oregones
to 57% off the cover price. Ads by Goo __oooQ1C
~py~~4Q41hc. Rsglsicr=Guard
unlessin wh1G1Lta"RYllght2Q9 4_9ICdssAP).
cc
http://www.registerguard.com/news/2004/ 10/06/ed.col.yesomn37.1006.html
Fre
TO
Su
P1
10/19/2004
Entered into the Record on /o
~~nula-u;~~:tU,(sdv
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON By:
Agenda Item#.3 Exhibit
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL OPPOSING STATE BALLOT
MEASURE 37.
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council supports existing federal and state constitutional
provisions to compensate property owners for their loss when a taking occurs; and
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council supports the Oregon State land use planning system
as established by SB 100 in 1973 and
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council acknowledges that the framers of SB 100, including
Governor Tom McCall, recognized that the proposed land use planning system would
have negative financial impacts on many property owners and proposed separate
legislation to address those financial impacts and
WHEREAS, SB 849 a companion bill to SB 100, seeking to address inequities in the
states land use system was never adopted and
WHEREAS, in the ensuing thirty-one years, the financial burdens of our land use
planning system continue to be inequitably distributed and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 is an earnest but flawed attempt to fully implement the intent of
the framers of our land use system by addressing these inequities and
WHEREAS, Measure 37 may have severe negative consequences including a significant
loss of local authority to address development impacts, and extreme administrative and
financial burdens on local government
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Tigard City Council supports the
intent of Measure 37 but opposes its passage on grounds that it is not the best solution to
a serious statewide problem; and:
SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council urges all Tigard residents to study the measure
and its impacts and vote NO on Measure 37.
SECTION 2: The Tigard City Council, in recognition that the entire land use system is
in jeopardy because of legislative deadlock, urges the Oregon Legislature to put aside
philosophical differences and craft and pass legislation that will complete Oregon's land
use planning system as it was originally intended with financial safeguards for property
owners.
SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage.
PASSED: This day of 22004
Craig Dirksen, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jane MCGarvin, Deputy City Recorder
AGENDA ITEM #
FOR AGENDA OF 0/19/04
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Joint Meeting with Senior t_;enter tsoara
PREPARED BY: Loreen Mil)L~~~_ DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK
i
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Annual joint meeting with the Senior Center Director & Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
No action is anticipated.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
City of Tigard and Loaves and Fishes have been partners in operating the Tigard Senior Center for more than 20
years. Each year during the fall, the City Council and Tigard Senior Center Director & Board meet to provide an
open fonun to discuss the types of programs being delivered to the significant multi-cultural senior population in
our community.
As discussed during previous visits, one of the challenges for the City and Loaves and Fishes at the Tigard Senior
Center is to keep current service and program needs relevant for today's senior population while preparing to meet
the escalating demands for services and programs as the "baby boomers" mature. Tigard's population of 65 and
older is over 10% with the baby boomers making up another 22% of our population base.
Knowing the service and program needs are on the rise and space is limited at the existing Senior Center, the City
has received preliminary approval for a $450,000 CDBG Grant for Center improvements. This grant must be
applied for and the construction completed within the next five years. The Senior Center Director will explain
some of the process in place for achieving the space improvements at the Center.
The Senior Center operation continues to be run very cost effectively and the Center is very successful in
fundraising, however, these efforts alone will not be enough to meet the "baby boomer" explosion on the senior
service industry.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
N/A
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
N/A
ATTACHMENT LIST
N/A
FISCAL NOTES
The City currently funds the Senior Center operation by providing cash in the amount of $20,000 in this fiscal
year and in-kind services valued at about $60,000. In-kind services include utilities (other than phone),
janitorial services, public works staff time and materials for building maintenance, etc.
The total budget at Tigard Senior Center for Tigard Loaves & Fishes for last year was about $246,000. The
resources taken in at the Center came to $206,000. That includes money from contracts held by Loaves &
Fishes for the senior nutrition program ($84,000), money 00)~int the
on the Centeras endowment(of almost
donations from individuals and groups and beque($412 700, With the $20,000
$10,000. Additional projects, pancake breakfast, and sales brought in an additional $9,
from the City of Tigard there was still a shortfall of almost $40,000 for the day-to-day operations. That support
came from funds raised by the Loaves & Fishes Centers Incorporated. The Loaves & Fishes support totaled
$124,000 due to all the government contract money coming through L&F contracts.
Over and above the budgeted funds mentioned above, it is important to also recognize the contract for client
services that supplies so much for seniors and their families through the work that our coordinator does in the
community. Also, there is savings for the Tigard Center because we get our food through an operation that
prepares 4,000+ meals a day.
L,m\.H.\DOCS\Senior CenteACC Sum 10-19-04.doc
Entered into the Record on
BY:
Agenda Item# 'r Exhibit I
1%1fMll8klP8lMlWllM
ONOMM
Lam and
VAIM
SON=
Uo~s
Muss
Tird Senior Center
Tiverd Senior Center
Almost 2,,/3 of the
meals delivered & served
are to residents in the
City of Tigard
ever 1/2 of the
"English as a second
language" students
live in Tigard
Monthly Senior
Center
Newsletters
a
Tigard Senior Center
New Look in Dining Room
linafd SMIU Ce
Lower Birth Rate
• coming of Age of Baby Boomers
• increasing Longedriy
ure exnectaacv
1900 = d1 veers of ale
1955 = 65 veers of 39e
2000 = 71 veers of age
20501ffe ex8ecta®cv Is N u h•
age i0 for men and 85 far we®eo 1
Beginning In 20110 in the Us, a Baby
Boomer turns 65 every 7 seconds...
for 18 years!
ili ~ Ii~OSt
p~pm didal grow
dd, toy di9d.
6
1Mers ars70.o00 pew ovw
100lIanMel"IN1MIL
ig prpH,~11 t0
v
b~ ONE MILLION UV
1050.
Mh NNr Ts Nie1iN
M-ow
AtlMf1:
umm" moms
Moomr0l
A
age is it stage of l:i?xE
Not it stage of dying
What is our response now?
Senior Home delivered Meals on Wheels &
Lunches Lunches in the Dining Room M-F
Classes
Computers, writing, ESL, Spanish,
jewelry making, home maintenance,
knitting, quilting, carving...
Programs
Health and wellness, Hispanic lunches
nutrition education, drug interaction
insurance information, local topics...
Activities
Clubs for gardeners, artists, stamp
collectors, knitters, embroiderers,
Model A, T and Vintage Speedsters...
Outreach Programs
• If our hope is that no senior will go
hungry or experience social
isolation,
• Thinking "outside the Box" we have
begun programs to serve isolated
seniors by extending our reach
• We took lunch and information to
mobile home parks and church
senior groups.
8
P ne Kfure
ParipfFor what service changes are needed to attract
baby boomers and meet their needs?
Given the current financial condition of all
Senior Center partners, how Will this
increased need be staffed a funded?
Due to healthy Ittesriles, more older people
will live in the community rather than
institutions. Now do we prepare service
delivery networks for this situation?
9
Thanks to City Council
,,Preparing For The Future
Upgrade/update for tomorrow's seniors
Expedite meals delivery/dining experience
Offer varied food types and menu choices
Program and plan for a wider age range
Increase socialization/education space
improve lighting, traffic patterns and
storage
CDCC Funding
• Within next 5 years
(hopefully 2007-08 year)
• plan Development
• Engage the community
• Assistance needed
10
NOW Can I Halop
• Serve on the Planning
Committee
• Provide vision for the project
• Volunteer at the Senior
Center
• Tax-free giving at year end
Serving our Changing
Senior Community
Questions
11
Entered into the Record on /G I %Z&
October 2004 Tigard Senior Center By: n<<r~~i
Tigard Loaves Fishes Agenda Item# #7 Exhibit
MONDAY
TUESDAY WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
1
COME JOIN US FOR LUNCH
F
10 Intermed English
I
9 Wood Carving
TUTOR ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGU
AGE
9:45 Pinochle
I
10 Intermed Span.
DELIVER MEALS ON WHEELS
Eugene Cecchini
I
Piano
VOLUNTEER AT THE CENTER 11
12:45 Pinochle
Golden K Klwanis
4
5
6
7
8
Bread from Winco
9-12 Tigard Art Club
9:00 Computer
10-12 Computer help
10 Intermed English
and Fred Meyers
10-12 Bridge
Fundamentals
9 Wood Carving
9:30 Computer
10 Intermed Span.
for seniors II
10-12 Knitting
9:45 Pinochle
Eddie Lim - piano
BINGO
10 Writing
10-3 Quilting
10 Intermed Span.
1:30 ESL-Spanish
10 ESL Talktime
Eugene Cecchini
Speakers
1:00 Beg Spanish it
Eddie Lim - piano
Piano
1:00 Beg Spanish 1
3 Tai Chi
7:00 Rose City
Rose City Stitchers
6:30 Water Color
7 Jewel Makin
Model T Club
12:45 Pinochle
St.Anthon 's
NORPAC
St. James Episcopal
TI and Methodist
TI and Christian
11
12
13
14
15
9:00 Yoga
9-12 Tigard Art Club
9:30 Computer
10-12 Computer help
10 Intermed English
9:30 Computer
10-12 Bridge
for seniors
Blood Pressure Check
9 Wood Carving
Eddie Lim - piano
10 Steering Comm.
9:45 Pinochle
1:30 ESL-Spanish
10 Intermed Span.
9-12 Footcare Clinic
10-12 Knitting
10 Intermed Span.
Speakers
Medicare supp.
Eugene Cecchini
1:00 Beg Spanish I
BINGO
10 ESL Talktime
10-3 Quilting
Piano
1:00 Beg Spanish II
Eddie Lim - piano
12:45 Pinochle
7 Rose City
7 Home Maintenance
1:30 ESL-Spanish
Stitchers
6:30 Water Color
7 Jewelry Making
Speakers
Providence
Kin CI Lions
Calvin Presbyterian
Church of God
Tigard Methodist
18
19
20
21
22
9:00 Yoga
9-12 Tigard Art Club
9:30 Computer
10-12 Computer help
9 Wood Carving
9:30 Computer
10-12 Bridge
for seniors
9:453 Pinochle
Eddie Lim - piano
10 Intermed Span.
10-12 Knitting
10 Intermed Span.
BINGO
10 ESL Talktime
10 Intermed English
1:00 Beg Spanish ii
FLU SHOTS
10-3 Quilting
Eugene Cecchini
1:00 Beg Spanish 1
7 Home Maintenance
Hispanic Lunch
1:30 ESL-Spanish
1:30 ESL-Spanish
7 Northwest Vintage
1:30 ESL-Spanish
Speakers
Speakers
Speedsters
Speakers
1-4 Legal Assistance
6:30 Water Color
Trabajadores
TG Knitting Guild
b appointment)
Woods rin s
Transition Students
Atrevidos
St Vincent de Paul
Retired Teachers
25
26
27
28
29
9:00 Yoga
9-12 Tigard Art Club
9:30 Computer
10-12 Computer help
9 Wood Carving
9:30 Computer
10-12 Bridge
for seniors II
9:45-3 Pinochle
King City
10 Intermed Span.
10-12 Knitting
10 Intermed Span.
Senior Lunch
BINGO
Footcare Clinic
10 Intermed English
Eddie Lim - piano
1:00 Beg Spanish II
10 ESL Talk-time
10-3 Quilting
Eugene Cecchini
1:30 ESL-Spanish
6:30 Water Color
Eddie Lim - piano
1:30 ESL-Spanish
Speakers
7 Home Maintenance
1:30 ESL-Spanish
Speakers
1:00 Beg Spanish 1
7 Alzheimer's
Speakers
Support Group
OR Trail Model A
Christ the King
St. Anthony's
Calvin Presbyterian
Metzger Methodist
Tigard Christian
Tigard Loaves & Fishes
Tigard Senior Center
NEWSLETTER
Servina Tigard. King City, Metzger ana rrogress ova o~••
Tigard Loaves
Tigard Senior
LOAVES&F'ISHES
The Meals-On-Wheels People
NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION
US POSTAGE
PAID
PORTLAND OR
PERMIT 1087
Fishes
Center
O
a`
v
w°
®Q1
d~
y
C
~I
-P I
0
0
0
11._.
L
N
O
C
V
N
C
b
O
CL
N
a~
ce
3
F-
N
~ U 7 ~ ; O tJ
d
.O
W G 'b C t A
~
C
O O ~
`J
C
N H
°f2 o o 3 •y o`°o ai
`o
Z ~ ~ ~p o c d o o° `n
c0 .
~ N
A E
~
~
c
°
C
x
8
c
01 ° co u
U~ 3 T~ S c
A
A Ln c_ a
w~ u o
, 13
~i O '~7 a+ c
N o .p
t
2
2 0
L L C N= s
QQ$ c c o .e ~
I~ m
d 3 E v A 0 N'
i
C N
O
Hp y~ ° V V 4 r
.C J~ L V ~ t
y>~ O
N
c A O v F y U
tO C ~ 10 to
c• +•'c 6 i
N W = ]1
roles o P, u r , ~ E r
y~
~ y L 6 G L 'S N 3C .NC
= 4 W C p ~
~ ~ N E ' L c
w 3~ c ~ p Cx y N
c c E g G s v s u v
Z co v1 U s u u 3 3 3 L 9
N
C_
~ .G C
W
OG 'a
C ~ A
v
N
A
° a
V!
.y
s ~
a'
a
C
_ u
i
c C 7
°O
N c
-
g
~
~
~
U ~
~7 ~ c •
~ ~ t
~
C
C ~ O
p
v
C
y
o ~
12 C)
p
~
O u
+U~ O V
N~ C
. ~ i ~N s v 0 `p N a Q1 c
7
v
u N
C
~
E 8
C W
j
o
i
0 C i
E ai E 'N a° c
~ 0.
1L
q ~ ~ A
sz~
y
+p
L
Gebr~~o~ve
r.
•
~
'
u
u
o
,
•c °
Q
m oa
G C Q
w
S 1
'„L
L=M
~.C .O ^
O
~Q„
~
00
O GN O
0
0
'O
C
5 N '
r
M
qN i
~p
M
r K
7 A~
7p` S
M1
U yQ:~ y
00
M
>
Ipi1i 0~0~
y~~+~ L
L
-c
0.0.10- y
3U0°r°
.
~cC p v
cF O~ °
> o0v =
°
Zc 1 C)
°
iJ3~~C7
ow a
cn
r3 ,11
N v
°
V
z c°°
m
V] 00 `
~V v
~
N y
1001M
~ y
yApM~
n
ra
7•AM'S
,
a
30r
C3 =
N
a
~lO 1-MQ
°O~
N MQ
~L=a°p C
oo p°.
U~_.av,~1
00
rain is
00.0.
~-ooF-v,•G
02iE°~
E-C, a. ce
0_rav,
1
O
/
1/
i
i
N
t w
~
c
y
c'`,
i
U N
M 2
p
N
SQ
>
_ M Q
C
V
O
O w
C
.y
r •
'L
N O
N
,p
0
IM CA
o
Cn
C ti
N
C,
M1 d
N
4F
V)
y
C° C
O
Q
"0 r, D E
z
O
~G
~ _
m -1
t4 P
o "x Y
E N
r
C7~
~
O
y~
C
030
~0
c
°p
R am
x
O
°
x
o
u
°W~
a
-
~
N
z
N
C~
Q0
~
~w d
C
~
°
V
o
o• °
-
"
N V=im
C
uj.,
^C~
Z 1 C00
~m
C'
C
[
'
m
C
°
-
{ff
Q
d~
a
Cv,
A
ao
o
LL rG C00 y
A .
n
r S3
C .0 00
3)z z
r N c
o
'
Vl t
d
C N
i+ A 00 y
L
0
>
V
1 t0
U O°O 1: M C-R i
C
W
N N
(
~
v J
N
UM T.. M tl
<Z r.. M d
0cn t: + 00 d
0
c, 'n
OT OOw
~
L
In .i
0~
0
00
c.
CA
M 00
Z,nav,tr
r 00 Q
CGra f,~
Q
GO 00
_ra~n
, 00
Z- a~,F
u d a~,a
-a n
Q~
v
~
c0
°
10
o o`,
c
~
Q
~
V
~
v
Q
a
Q
:z
K
-
0
oq
C CQ
!
.
C
v,O
'bO
C
E
U
0
i
8
N
=
A pc~v~
NO
fi
>
O 'a
v, V]O i
7
~
O
>r
O,
Q
C N
E
N >N
O
O
C
N K
I Qr N Q
N p
O C r
CyF~ a c
r0•G
004
c N •O
AO
E
C ~'a
1~ y
J
04 oo
'e s v,
Ofx oo~
U
p c od r_
:1Z
°
00
p
.;a oi, oci
oo Z
11
0x CMS
OR
o
~
p
dC
++m 0v, °
'n
C
a
µ.a ,p
OO a
'a
6 N
p
0 o
0
U> '0oo'i
°
O,oNO e`,nA
oo c
. W'o
V
zf O v
oo'C
-O -0
O O~0 d
p
3
r+i
> N y
OW
oo
00
E A b
\
g
V VI N
00
p
cm oo c:
b
CC
00 (Z
0 00 p`
01 C
A O > .Op
~
0 T. M N
-c 0 tir M b
°
E O O °
N O O
I
.
,O O O p Q
Q§t tonq
gv°,4
~vlnip
cLl,p°v°1W
On~
Una
U~ a W)
DC4
DoP
cl.
v
Z' u 8 oa0o .o e p o
•i/'~ 3 ° is Cp Cu L~ .`-u' N `,9 Fs 3 o~ r
Cl.
.iJ 9 A C .1C .iC O L E C V C vi -N p is O U
to A to
C V
~ V U .C OD Q C ~J •iF
> co y ~ u e o j '
> Nf t u u A 00 p~
.2 A
on E2
7~.. r T° L ~y y y `C z i' Y.,.
5 c E c= c a ❑ ?o .2 ~S a ti y E "11Y.r
Ta c d i ? w O
°u < .6 C~ E o K h a
`o
H y, _ N C N ~ ~ _
C o V o ° u w` E i c V c c c L o s c
to 00
c N W .n 7J W V~1 0. ,O.
V < a h a s` ° n •E ° v E .~J L OG C H o c
C1 N u v r u . .w H E `o % U C O v¢ o v> o a.
~y C O M G4 ~ 7 ~ N OC a' Gil
,A g C t L° N A L y 7 N C ~i 'O 2 ~7 U N 'N C ~ W G v ~ ^:7 N
W ~ y
H C a ,p N •.1, V v 1 J > W L ° C C 4. `n H
O LL. C Li. h O~ L 'O 7 O` d+ O C 4 O T y Z^ ~y • C
C Y, n V y
yJ dJ C3 v -
c E o
C N C+ 0 0~ 5 C y j E w n 'c-1. a c 4' L° b Z O OG O y y oo f 1
O u P c c G E s `o Ql ° ri% !i ° v
.2 E
yj v ti > c v
l) y (1)
O O v E c v u_ u ~
o. o E ° C c 1 Fes- c s °v
U h .5 ti? E n o or A v 'L o
N in b o . _ J~
ai
v
b cOd c 3=
c y 5 2 s o i c i°
o a v o ono a y 3
C oo = cc°i t ai
W. 0 CZ .2 Sp
/1~ U •y Li i~ 'LS •C fC •,y U U 4J N y U 'p N •V U Ll.
ii Y/ t0 GU 6~~ ~ it 7J U 6J C C~.
41
C O cn e~uo a+ y d d o o JS L t, c c d
V t 22
v 3 a~ b H 'O fd w G E w:
F a a U 0 O a O si w
Q d v 3 1,:a
l• •
o -s cn
a o„g ~ .5
tii p N ~ 7 p
G co T ~CC
r. O O ~ O cY
Q cd y L r
R Q cd (U
U
T 3
CD cn O to
N O O 5 Itl 14
e 3 x ° o
y v
O
L v o >
T
r0 O O .~C 0
GO Q •G 4'y U L _W
o
o " E°v en Z ~o°e
O $ cA g ¢ ° " o n
(1) 5.12
h U C U b 1 W
L Z° ° g E b
dl o~~ ~~~o
u , U
V O ce i O roil O
0
0
b
w°
0
O
co
V.
O
cd
z
Q
3 0
r^~ ~ Q
V ,
E o Y s
< o 0 o E E n
s 61 3 R v
y v c ° c -o vi 0 a E ° °
4 ~ y
a < •E .N U y C °
4
W N .C y .d u L U
C
w ~ ~ .ti. LR.. C Iy.. •pN ~
C u y C R 'L F' N C p
C C y
° y v v EC w` ° p
h C y` O V •O C3 7 N y C y= C
w u o c= c E$ s, c o c
R •o A s E .3 u m E S cu
-ID
Z = O .0 C= u C H s C~ O
O N v Y C' C LR. u y L' C h :.D C y
YJ' 4- u O L "O
b ~ ~ c 5 a~ x~ w U .°ic s E o 13
° Q C L :Q • 3 V
C ° y 'u C N d N C
o, c ro` W a_y+ 73
p O M C R h
-h- V U C U ~Nn T 'CIO h n O
QO r y, N ~ ~ N C ~ T ~ C L = 'D 4 K
S Z O fl O O
16
K N V
r° s R s t w 3°
72
C :3 • G ~CFy ' ~ = v~
~ ~ y V ~ • A ~ V ~ • ~ y ny1 7 K
yy .L V w 3 .o O V
V C4
N p o. ~ ■ ~ n i Y T ~ ~ t O C~
T O U ~
rn ti c L v c V, m
o 9~ c e 2 0 V a c y
AK
d y 4 V 8 O
g
tr_
° E
l yy
t3 :3 0
Q Ll Q v an V V :J
R
a
v
u
C
E N
>
W L
0) E R
C o E
O C
$ e
d
7 ~ N
R d
O
t
pp LL
r. O ~N
~ - >
A
= O
J
c
C
L e >
b
F~^ C)
b
d
O L"
E y $
U p T
0
; 4 >
~ o
R N
s
v 7 ai
~ d d
~ E C
~ y •Ir
N T
N
~ O
U C
V R
w O ~ .
'G C w y
R o v
V
o v
L ~ O
t ~ d
v
' E
Y ~ U
O
C N
n
U y d
i
43 U
v
r•"-• s
v .0 3
c
u C
O
R •
7
T •7 ~
O C .R..
E R „
E = E
•5 d
0
U U
> o ~
N L
L.. N. N
O y >
y C O
O E o
E R m
~ y E
a
T ~
a
p
e
y •u
~
~
` •7
n
o
g E
c
c
o
1
y
U
•
~
y ~
V o
u
E
=
C
E
w-y
•
N
T C
O
V
i
€
T
O
-0 0
O
O
7
E n•
b O
u
m h
C
O
. ~
.
>
c
0 •O
a
T
J
Y u w
L C
O
.
O
0
~
N L
n.
U ~
°
O :Jl
e. C
:a O
=
V ~
C O
Y
c... roil
o
a t
O
v
C 2
°
U~
o c
N r'
n
o 0
p ~ 'C
•9 C
Y Q•
y C CU.D •O
O r3
-C y cl1
0.
a
V
L
y
j
v
= 0
7
~
L ~ °J
u
D
L u u u E
a
"
5J 'O
u C on
d>
y
~0~
O
R U d
C O
C~ qY
U
U p
W
o,p O o0
~
'b d
u w ^
N
c1 4
°
L
•
p
y
y
O
T
N
H
u u o
9
C =p
U CA t.
.
C o
.
O
>
p
•
L 0.L-•
C
O
Y N
.
Y U Q
..D I
COi R
r C
•
N
R
7 L
R
.C L
u O y v
•C
O O cy„
t
R
o
`U'
c y n
c
o
°
$
v
0 7 0
C
C
R s
>
E
0'
u
U w •y s
° o
.O
c"U
R
c
b t
i
p
°c.
O A
R 3 C
it
u C A
U 0
x w 7
v.
.
d d 0, o
c
U
C
C
7 C
.
a
d n
Z'
N
0
U y
xi
°
E
7 'N io
°
V C b
V
ev p?
O
a
u
.p O
~ U
1 7
N
4
.
E M
O
T cJ
R U C
R
>v
'v
Y R U G..
'L"' ~ s y
'C E
E y
~
q c.4
C
v+ •
u
3
U
°
.
4: y
•L
H
O L
s
L
0
C
O
O
E N U
c
~O
y y
.
p T R
•
A
.0. C O .C '0
vi
K
v '0
E O
R O A
u t A a~i
y
O
bN."
0
° u v
4 C
CL
ca
W w
O R
~j
pyp in
r
N
R C
N'
OO
.O CU
U
C
c
>
C ^ t0
I
`
.
r
.
X
O N
d YOD N Y-i C
'
~ ti
t
TM E
O
b b p
V co
coo ~
r E U R p
F •oo~ = ~
d
R C
U N o
MENU - OCTOBER 2004
Entrfe 2, available on& at senior dining sites. will also receive menu items not in bold print
Fri 1 BREADED FISH w/ Lemon Wedge & Tartar Sauce, Hashbrown Patty, Chuckwagon Corn, Homemade
Applesauce, White Roll, Chocolate Cake w/ White Frosting
*Taco Salad (Beef) with Shredded Cheese, Sour Cream, Taco Sauce, Tomato Wedges & Shredded Lettuce,
Refried Beans, Tortilla Chips
Mon 4 TURKEY TETRAZZINI CASSEROLE, Green Peas, Capri Mix Vegetables, Lime Applesauce Gelatin, Whole
Wheat Roll, Peach Halves
*Cheese Manicotti with Shredded Cheddar Cheese & Tomato Sauce, Sliced Yellow Squash
Tue 5 CURRIED PORK w/ Pasta, Shoestring Carrots, Red & White Slaw, Whole Wheat Roll, Raspberry Parfait
.Roast Beef & Cheese Sandwich with Shredded Lettuce, Tomato, & Mayo Pkg., Cream of Potato Soup
Wed 6 CHICKEN SALAD on Lettuce Leaf, Red Grapes (Garnish), Mandarin Oranges, Marinated Green Bean
Salad, French Bread, Strawberry Cheese Cake
*BBQ Pork an Whole Wheat Hamburger Bun, Seasoned Potato l*dges, linter Mir bcgetables
Thu 7 SPAGHETTI w/ Mcatxauce & Parmesan Cheese, Sugarsnap Peas, Spinach w/ Red Cabbage & Italian
Dressing, Whole Wheat Roll, Seasonal Fresh Fruit
*Tuna Salad Sandwich, Shredded Lettuce, Tomato Basil w/ Raviolini Soup
Fri 8 SALISBURY STEAK w/ Gravy, Rosemary Potatoes, Oregon Bean Medley, Mixed Greens w/ Blcu Cheese
Dressing ( MOW - French Dressing), White Roll, Banana Pudding Cake
*Macaroni & Cheese w/ Not Deg, Sliced Carrots
Mon 11 SWEET & SOUR CHICKEN , Brimn Rice, Oriental Vegetables, Apricot Gelatin Mold, Roll,Vanilla Pudding
*Cheeseburger wll.eaf Lettuce. Sliced 74maro, Ketchup & Mustard Pkg, French Fries
Tue 12 HAMBURGER STEAK w/ Gravy, flashed Potatoes , Bruswl Sprout, Four Bean Salad, Roll, Orange
*llegetarian Sandwich ( Ilumus, Swiss Cheese, Red Onions, l.rttuce, Cucumbers, 7nnrato,) Mayo Pkg,
with Shredded Lettuce, Tomato and ,tlavo PAg, Carden Iigetable Soup
Wedl3 SWEDISH MEAT BALLS, Spiral Noodles, Shoestring Cnrruts, Creamy Coleslaw, Roll, Sugar Cookic
*Chef Salad ( Lettuce, Letruce Liner, /lard Boiler) Bgg, Tomato, Turkey, Nam, Cheese,1000 Island Dres.)
Thu 14CIlICKEN PROVENCE, Brown Rice, Sugarsnap Peas, Pineapple Juice, Whole Wheat Roll, Fresh Pear
* Ilam & Cheese Sandwich , Sliced Tomato, Shredded Lettuce and Mayo Pkg., Captain's Corn Chowder
Fri 15 TUNA CASSEROLE, Cut Green Beans, Sliced Yellow Squash. Tossed Salad w/ Italian Urea„ Roll, Banana
*Chicken w/ Dumplings
Mon 18 CHICKEN BASIL SAUSAGE, Hot German Potato Salad, Chopped Spinach, Carrot Raisin Salad, White
Roll, Raspberry Bar
*Baked Potato w/ Shredded Cheese & Ham, Green Onions & Sour Cream
Tue 19 HUNGARIAN GOULASH, Fancy Noodles, Vegetarian Dinner Blend, Layered Salad , Whole Wheat Roll,
Russian Creme w/ Berry Topping
*Turkey Salad Sandwich, Shredded Lettuce, Sliced Tomato, Minestrone Soup
Wed20 TURKEY DIJON CASSEROLE, Seasoned Rice, Winter Mix Vegetables, Fruit Cocktail Melba Mold,
Whole Wheat Roll, Peach Cobbler
*Pepperoni Pizza, Tossed Salad with Italian Dressing
Thu 21 BREADED FISH w/ Lemon Wedge & Tartar Sauce, Lyonnaise Potatoes, Flavor Fiesta Vegetables, Red &
White Slaw, White Roll, Fruited Applesauce
*Roast Pork Sandwich, Shredded Lettuce, Sliced Tomato, & Mayo Pkg., Cream of Mushroom Soup
Fri 22 PORK TIPS, White Rice, Italian Cut Green Beans, Asian Slaw, Whole Wheat Roll, Lemon Pudding
*Ginger Chicken
Mon25 ORIENTAL CHICKEN w/ Low Mein Noodles, Stir Fry Vegetables, Perfection Salad, Roll, Rice Pudding
*Hot Dog on a Bun w/Ketchup & Mustard Pkg, Potato Salad
Tue 26 BAKED HAM w/ Cranberry Sauce, Scalloped Potatoes, Italian Vegetables, Cottage Cheese & Diced
Pears, White Roll, Chocolate Zucchini Cake
*Sliced Turkey & Cheese Sandwich, Shredded Lettuce, Sliced Tomato, Mayo Pkg., Roasted Vegetable &
Radiatore Soup
Wed27 BBQ CHICKEN, O'Brien Potatoes, Capri Mix Vegetables, Creamy Coleslaw, Roll, Strawberry Parfait
*Seafood Salad (Shrimp, Krab) on Leaf Lettuce, Lettuce, Shredded Cheese, Tomato Wedges, Sliced
Cucumbers, 1000 Island Dressing
Thu 28TERYIAKI BEEF TIPS, White Rice, Sugarsnap Peas, Tossed Salad w/ French Dressing, Whole Wheat
Roll, Peanut Butter Pie
*Corned Beef Sandwich on Light Rye Bread, Swiss Cheese, Shredded Lettuce, Sliced Tomato, Mustard
Pkg, Mayo Pkg, Potato Soup
Fri 29 SPINACH SALAD w/ Turkey & Cheese, Italian Dressing, Baby Carrots, Orange Wedge, Marinated
Beets, Whole Wheat Roll/ Crackers, Halloween Cookies
*Open Face Pork Sandwich, Gravy, Mashed Potatoes, Green Peas, Spinach tv/ Red Cabbage Salad
MENU t IS Cr ME TO CHANGE Each meal includes milk and a choice of coffee or tea (senior dining sites only).
Modified diets are available with a doctor's prescription: soft, low sodium, diabetic, low cholesterol.
AGENDA ITEM #
FOR AGENDA OF October 19, 2004
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Briefing on Metro Proposal for Mandatory Business Recycling
PREPARED BY: Tom Imdieke DEPT HEAD OK -d- CITY MGR OK 4
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Staff briefing at a City Council workshop on a proposal to initiate mandatory business recycling in the Metro region
along with other management practices being considered to meet the region's target of 62 percent waste recovery
rate by 2005.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
No action needed at this time.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Regional Solid Waste Management Plan (RSWMP) is designed to provide a framework for coordinating
solid waste and recycling programs in the Portland metropolitan region. Metro first adopted the RSWMP in
1988. This plan is now being updated for the next ten years (2005-2015). The purpose of the plan is to:
• Provide a framework for coordinating solid waste programs within the region;
• Establish direction for the solid waste system;
• Identify roles and responsibilities; and,
• Fulfill a state requirement that Metro have a waste reduction plan.
Metro's goal is to have a draft plan completed and public hearings held with the Metro Council in the fall of
2005.
The region had set a goal to recover 62 percent of the waste that is generated by 2005 and 64 percent by 2009.
Although great strides have been made to reach the goal, data is now telling us that the region is not on track to
meet the target of 62 percent by 2005. As of 2002, the region's recovery rate stood at 54 percent.
As part of the process to update the plan, a set of recommended solid waste management practices are being
developed designed to meet the overall goal of the waste management plan. The process has included
roundtables involving approximately 200 citizens. Recommended practices are being developed in the
following areas:
• Residential Waste Reduction
• Business Waste Reduction
• Building Industries.Waste Reduction
• Solid Waste Facilities and Services - Regulation and Siting
• Solid Waste Facilities and Services - Transfer and Disposal
It is Metro's intent that each local government will implement either a recommended practice or an approved
alternative.
Metro reports that half of the waste going to area landfills comes from businesses, and much of that waste could
be recycled. Metro also reports that in order to meet the 2005 goal, the region must recover more than 200,000
tons from businesses.
So in August 2003, Metro Council appointed a stakeholder work group to recommend a "Contingency Plan"
that identifies strategies to increase recovery for the sectors where the largest tonnage of recoverable waste
remains: offices, the food service industry, and the construction industry. The work group included
representatives from public agencies, private businesses, citizens, and the solid waste and recycling industry. A
list of the members of this group are attached to this memo.
The work group's recommended strategy would require local governments to adopt standards that mandate
businesses to recycle specific materials, while Metro would provide additional funding to expand business
recycling assistance and outreach. The Washington County Coop staff is already providing this service to
businesses in Tigard and other cities in the County. These funds would be used to expand this program. The
City of Portland has required businesses to recycle since 1996.
Staff will be providing Council with additional information at the October 19 workshop. In addition, the
Washington County Coo is compiling additional information that will be available some time in November.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
N/A
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
N/A
ATTACHMENT LIST
Additional information will be provided at the meeting.
FISCAL NOTES
Unknown at this time.
Recommended Practices Being Considered by Metro
Entered into the Record on /o/-/-
By: Torn
Residential
Agenda Item# Exhibit
1) Education and Information for Waste Prevention
2) Expansion of Home Composting
3) Expand and Increase Participation in Existing Residential Curbside Programs
4) Development of New Collection Technologies
5) Curbside Collection and Processing of Residential Food Wastes
Business Waste Reduction Practices
1) Waste prevention and recycling education, information, and market development
2) Expanded source-separated (pre-collection recycling)
3) Collection and off-site recovery of source-separated food and non-recyclable paper
4) Regional processing facilities for mixed dry waste
5) Fibcr-based fuel
Buildin Industries (Construction and Demolition)
1) Develop targeted technical and education programs
2) Ensure availability of on-site source separation at construction sites where practical
and cost-effective
3) Develop markets to support recycling rather than energy recovery
4) Develop regional dry waste processing facilities for construction and demolition
waste from sites where separating and collection of recyclables is not practical or
cost-effective
Solid Waste Facilities and Services - Regulation and Sitin
1) Yard debris processing system
2) Establish organic waste regulatory system
Solid Waste Facilities and Services - Transfer and Disposal System
1) Maintain existing system of three transfer stations. Build no new transfer stations.
No redirection of haulers from Metro South to Metro Central.
2) Maintain the existing system of private general and limited-purpose landfills.
3) Maintain options for haulers to choose among disposal alternatives.
4) Allow reload facilities site, owned and operated by haulers for consolidation of loads
for hauling to Metro transfer stations to serve areas distant from transfer stations.
AGENDA ITEM # ~ ~
FOR AGENDA OF ctober 19, 2004_
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Potential rro ects for in `OK` v` `u11V„ ~ CITY MGR OK C lh ~ V v ' '
PREPARED BY: A.P. uena~s DEPT HEAD
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Presentation to Council of potential projects to be submitted for consideration in the County's MSTIP
Transportation Capital Program. Council discussion and direction will be requested. Based on Council direction, a
project list will be submitted for formal Council approval at the October 26, 2004 business meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
That City Council, discuss, provide direction on the projects that should be included in the list for consideration in
the County's MSTIP Transportation Capital Program, and direct staff to submit the project list for approval at the
October 26, 2004 Council meeting.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Washington County Board of Commissioners recently approved a list of projects for the County's MSTIP 3b
(Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program). The funding for the projects approved will come from the
portion of the County's general fund that is attributable to the Measure 47/50 conversion of the MSTIP 3 serial
levy. The Commuter Rail project was considered Tigard and Tualatin's project under MSTIP 3b. The final project
list therefore did not include any new road projects for this area of the County.
The Board of Commissioners is considering an additional allocation for the six-year period 2007 through 2012.
This is in part to show the citizens of the County that the serial levy permanized by Measure 50 would continue to
be used for transportation. In addition, the County's Transportation Plan adopted by the Board in October 2002
identified significantly more needs than resources likely to be available to meet them. As part of the development of
a Transportation System Funding Plan, the County (in conjunction with the cities in the County) is beginning a
public outreach process to obtain input from citizens, policy makers, businesses and interest groups on the funding
alternatives that would be acceptable to meet this shortfall. The six-year commitment of MSTIP dollars would
identify high priority projects to be designed and constructed through 2012. The high priority projects that would
not be addressed through this commitment could be addressed in part through increases in traffic impact fee,
through a fixture MSTIP measure, or through other funding measures that could surface following evaluation of the
input received through the public outreach process.
The County estimates approximately $23 million net annual revenue resulting in approximately $140 million over
the six-year period. The County will submit a list of projects to improve major roads that have Countywide
benefits. The cities in the County have been asked to submit projects that are of high priority within the local
jurisdictions. The target allocation for the City of Tigard is $5,287,000 based on 2002 population information.
Attached is a memorandum dated September 23, 2004 from Kathy Busse, Assistant Director of Land Use and
Transportation, providing many of the details on the program and the process for project selection.
The time frame for project selection is extremely aggressive. The County's TAC (Transportation Advisory
Committee) will review the list of projects on November 4, 2004 for recommendation to the Coordinating
Committee. The County Coordinating Committee is scheduled to discuss and approve a proposed project list at its
November 15, 2004 meeting. This would allow the Board to act on the list sometime in January2005. Based on
this compressed schedule for submittal, the County is requesting cities to submit their list of projects by October 29,
2004. This would allow the County to consolidate the various lists into one master list for discussion at the TAC
meeting on November 4, 2004.
Attached is a list of potential projects for Council discussion and consideration. The list is not all inclusive but
reflects some of the high priority projects that need to be addressed at some point in the future. Because the funding
is limited for the six-year pcriod, other high priority projects not included in the list or selected for submittal could
be submitted for inclusion in a future MSTIP proposal for Countywide vote.
Following the discussion, Council will be requested to provide direction on the project list to be submitted to the
County. The project list would be submitted for formal Council approval at the October 26, 2004 meeting to allow
submittal of the list to the County by the October 29, 2004 deadline.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None
VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY
The construction of major street projects in the City mects the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow goals of Improve Traffic
Flow, Improve Traffic Safety, and Identify and Develop Funding Resources.
ATTACHMENT LIST
1. Potential MSTIP Transportation Capital Program Project List
2. Key Points for the Proposed Projects (MSTIP Transportation Capital Program)
3. Memorandum dated September 23, 2004 from Kathy Busse, Assistant Director of Land Use and
Transportation, to the WCCC Transportation Advisory Committee
FISCAL NOTES
The matching funds for the projects would primarily be from the Traffic Impact Fee Fund. Metro's MTIP
funding may be available for one or more of the projects.
Lierp~Ovskanca agenda yymmWWSX10.1004 {ntedjw woleas W the msnv mwn apey awrn+ a13 60C
V
° C,
$ o
CD CD C) 0
$ $ o $
p
o
S
$
o
$ °
$
11-1
r+
i
~
i
y H
N V) H H N
e'
H
u
°
O
$ H $ H N
$
° %n
14
O
cz 2
N N
N H
N
rw
$ OO
° $ $ pp $
O O
S O
O
O
O
U
O O
CD O
O
O O O O 00
N
O
Vl
N
$
N
N
H H N N
H
Q
Q Q QQ 5Q~
S $ S S S
°
$ S
8
$ in $ $
is
{%i ~
N N N N
M
°
0
U
~
w
$ $ $ o $
0 0 o g °
3
C °
tn %n
o o a
C. cz
a
N N H N N
a
i
a
°
CD cm
$
$ ° o
o
o U
°
o
C
°
°
o o °
N
C
°
{q H
°
°
.Nr N
N N N N N
y .8
G
0 CL
A
'L7
ri
O O
O O
O Q
O Q
O
C
w
`
w
eT
O O
O O
O O
O
G
W
~.y
°
ape: L
6~
a
n vZ
O
O
W)
N
H
jo
F~
~i
p"'
N N
N
3 a°~ I•_°-
e3 o o
°
y
fin
ao~~
a
a- '
L
O
p O
0O
•
G W :J O Y
0
V
R t
' T.
O
. p
8 p
G O p
O
G
.
N 0 0
M
7
W w b "
R ` O d
L
R
o°a e°t 3= H
p °
s c
Ae0 u
A
A Z A R Z Z
e7
O
L o QN
u
O
A a
r R T
F
co
°
ro a
'
O
m co
>
p 'O O
3 ~d
R
8
° >
ON
a
a
,
A
o
H
p
ca cc
yy _
y~
X
w 4>w
9 o L~
_
a,
a 4
i b d
9
s
' C O Q
~ N~ O 0 8
s
d i
~
a
y
f-I
°
a o, a
„
ea
of
d
co
d°° °
rm
L
°
~
0
e
L
o a
o
Q 4 C
ca
Wa
g
cc Ca
C3
d d
a
= C3
3
C7
C7 v
a
3EC7
0~s~a~ °
m
n
a
oa
i
L
p
°
g w
o
rA
t
V
U
E;
vn
j
U
9
s
8
Key Points for the Proposed Projects
MSTIP Transportation Capital Program
Walnut Street (Tiedeman Avenue to 1215` Avenue)
• Fills in the gap between the improved intersections
• Promotes better balanced traffic flow by providing an improved alternative to Gaarde
Street
• Improvements should be in place in anticipation of the Murray Boulevard Extension
implementation
Design completed and rights-of-way acquisition more than halfway completed
• Will be ready for construction immediately (2007)
Greenburg Road (Shady Lane to Tiedeman Avenue)
• Supports the Regional Center
• Main entry into the Regional Center via Greenburg Road and Tiedeman Avenue
• Arterial classification. Carries 18,000 vehicles per day with 31,000 vehicles projected
future traffic
• MTIP funding provided for design and ROW
• Commitment for MTIP funding is that project must be constructed 9 years after initial
funding is made available
• Expensive project in that the bridge needs to be replaced as part of the widening
• Multi-modal project in that it would include bikelanes on both sides (versus one side only
on the existing road) and sidewalks on both sides
Burnham Street (Main Street to Hall Boulevard)
• Supports the Tigard Downtown Development
• Project will be guided by the results of the Tigard Downtown Development Plan
• Design and ROW can be performed to prepare the street for construction when MSTIP
funds become available
• Street badly needs reconstruction and widening
72nd Avenue (Beveland Street to Dartmouth)
• Widens a bottleneck into the Tigard Triangle
• Dartmouth/72nd intersection improvements would most likely be constructed before the
MSTIP funds become available
• Project would provide a widened and improved street from Hampton Street to Dartmouth
Key Points - MSTIP Potential Project List
Page 1 of 2
1215' Avenue (Rose Vista Drive to Tippit Place)
• Provides an improved connection from Gaarde Street through Walnut Street to Scholls
Ferry Road
• Design completed. ROW acquisition in the initial stages
• Project would be ready for construction when MSTIP funds become available
Scoffins/Hunziker/Hall Intersection Realignment and Signalization
• This project would create the existing dogleg in that area by realigning Scoff ns to form a
4-legged intersection with Hunziker Street and Hall Boulevard
• Project would improve traffic circulation on Hall and reduce the backups that currently
occur on Hall and Hunziker at various hours of the day
Project has long been identified as high priority in the City's transportation plans
• Project would provide more efficient access into the Tigard Central Business District
• Acquisition of apartment complex necessary for the realignment
Greenburg Road/Highway 99W/Main Street Intersection Improvements
• Identified as one of the high priority projects for east-west circulation in the City across
Highway 99W
• Would promote more efficient movements to and from Highway 99W
• Would be the next logical intersection for improvement following the improvements to
Hall and 99W funded through MSTIP 3
• Would have high visibility with the public and the citizens of Tigard
Key Points - MSTIP Potential Project List
Page 2 of 2
September 23, 2004
To WCCC Transportation Advisory Committee
From: Kathy Busse, Assistant Director
Land Use and Transportation
Subject: MSTIP TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM:
Framework and Project Selection Process
As discussed in the memo on this item in your meeting packet, the Board has been
considering an additional allocation from the portion of the County's general fund that is
attributable to the Measure 47/50 conversion of the MSTIP 3 serial levy.
The Board will not formalize its decision until October 19, but we have decided to
proceed on the basis of its preliminary commitment to the program. To that end, we
have put together the following overview of proposed provisions for consideration:
Framework considered by Board:
Six-year commitment: 2007 through 2012
Approximately $23 million annually (net of commitments for $10 million in 1-5/99W
Connector matching funds and Commuter Rail and MSTIP 2 and 3 bonding expenses)
Program considerations:
• The program would be composed of two project sets: 1) Countywide Ni ujcuia, ii iuac
on major facilities that have countywide benefits, and 2) Local projects, which have
more localized benefits.
• The County would take the lead in developing the core set of Countywide projects
package, with discussion and consultation by all jurisdictions as the package is
defined.
• Each jurisdiction would be responsible for allocating ies share of the Local share
allocation
• Providing project matching funds is encouraged and will enable local jurisdictions to
extend their local shares
• Program expenditures should follow cash flow (i.e. minimal-to-no bonding)
• Projects previously funded from "special funds" (e.g., bike and pedestrian projects,
bridge projects, etc.) should be specifically identified up front.
• The County intends to focus resources on detailed scooping of proposed projects
before the proposed package is finalized.
9 Project Eligibility Criteria:
1. Countywide projects must be multi-modal;
2. Local share projects should be primarily multi-modal, but may include single-mode
projects;
3. Projects must be on the major system of arterial and collector roadways,
4. Projects must be consistent with an acknowledged Transportation Plan.
CAWINNTNTemp\WCCC TAC_DRAFT Project Selection 092204.doc
Proposed WCCC TAC Project Selection Process:
1. September 23 WCCC TAG - Review general funding commitment and allocation
structure (i.e., Countywide and local shares) at WCCC TAC meeting.
2. County identifies and does the analysis for countywide system project candidates.
(City suggestions encouraged during this time.)
3. County and cities independently review candidates and select projects as candidates
for use of local share funding arnounts.
4. October 29 submittal deadline for proposed proiect lists Submit of project
proposals to DLUT by 10129 for County staff to review and consolidate before 11/4
meeting.
5. November 4 WCCC TAC meeting - Initial review of proposed package by WCCC
TAC.
6. November.4-rSpecial WCCC TAC meeting for further review and refinement in 1:50
preparation
7. November 15 WCCC meeting - Distribution and initial review of package by WCCC
Attachments:
Proposed Funding Allocation
2001 "MSTIP 4" Project Candidates List
CAWINNT\Temp\WCCC TAC_DRAFT Project Selection 092204.doc
l+
~ I
I I
I
I
j
I
I
I
I
~ ~ I
1 cn
! 1
I
~
I
!
E
j
~
I
I I
~
~
N
1
!
I
1 I I
~
I
~
' { I f
l 1
I
I
~
~ i ~~i
I
f
I
I
I I ro i i
I ~
I
I
! i I
I
j
I
I i
O l i
I
I
~
!
i i
f (
Ip
O O'0
1CA
0
►
0 0 0
I
~
0
C)
0
O
0 O;
N~
C) 01
C O
C O Oj0
O C) O O
O
O
O
Ol
O
O
O
Oi0IC
Oj
0
0 c
O C
CD r! I,
N
Op
r) I- ti
r
-0
Cn O I Z1 i
I
o
i
i
(fl to rn (D
N
I--
U-) v co
NICOjN
a)
co
r
0) p
to O NI j
0 O
O
0 M r!r
0 O)
N
N
Q)
co
M! r u)
U)
N
U)
~
O
N
I
M CD >
I
Ery to
i co
Q Cn l to
C1>
U)
I U)
M
l C
I
I
I
l
rti ~
O
j
I c
I Ifo~ X
f
o
O o
-
Q
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
-
i E
0:
0 0 _
O CD
I
d
O I- r I m
d
O
O
H Q) "Zt
C`J
I U')
_
O. : E
O
E
C
I
O
tD N 16
d
CD
O N CT
Lo
CDM
, CD O
CL 0
L
I
O
L
O
p
w r
r
I i aj
V
lO N
I C
m
C
o
o
I
- CU rn
v
o
o
o
CD
o
0
w
0
0o
>
c
\
o
\
0
0
0
0
OO
m
CD
m
CA
CD
N
0
-T
r
co
I-
O
to
O
co
t
V
p
O
.W
O
C~
CD
co
0)
C)
M
to
CO
I
r
CD
C)
r
r
O
I-
.
CA
C
C
D
~
O
O
O
1 i
t--
m
co
zr
N
d
N
0
M
r
c7
O
O
O
p
r
r
r
o
to
N
C
O
O
O
O
C
o
lY
C
c0
co
o
O
c
C14
>
e
n-
co
~
N
N
o
!
O
CL
L
0
F-
U)
to).
ka
CD
C-4
CD
C4
D
EL
C~
C
G
O
dl
m
v
C
co
j
~
C)
o
-
m
L)
O
II
I
~
0
'
a)
f
4
a)
=3
_
CL
_
v
E
E
E
0
O
r
C
O
II
v
E
m
II
o
U
0
O
Q)
C'j
CU
E
O
U
_
cc
0
C.
o
im,
3
69.
7
a
0
Co
v)
CD
O
r,
O
'OC
H
E
0
E
O
O
a)
p
U
H
c0 a)
04
Z
Q)
Z'
rn
7
M
N
.
V
C
O
-
C7
O`
00
C
C
C
N
E
ca
C
w
C
LO
N
I 'a
'C
a)
a)
Co
to
U
n
j
iii
(U
E
E
p
0
L
O
L
CO
f
~
N
C
N
~
~
~
O
~
v
.4)
-3
~
o
a)
o
~
o
Y
s
U
D
:3
~
Q
z
t)
CL
f"
V
J
1--
U
a
-
U
m
o
o
LL
2
4
)
H
-
N
Entered into the Record on 1O ay
By: C 17/0A
~uena~
Agenda Item# G Exhibit
C/)
a)
L
a
L
E
L
0
L
8a
C
O
0.
CD
O
O
N
L
V
0
y-
v
L
m
V
E
C~
O
L
C~
cu
U
.0
O
0.
cn
(q~
u
WORM
M
a.
O
O
4-
fu
0)
O
CL
c
O
M
N
fu
E
■
O
c
fu
-W
O
fu
O
0
L
1
X
u
^
O
r)
0 0 0
c
O
w
O
t
i
N
O
N
cn
O
L
O
O
N
.o
O
4-J
L
O
U
O
O
L
O
CL
L
fu
M I
.0).X
L Q~
OC-
4- 4-J
C L
O O
4-J O
fu
V O
O O
f O
Q) 00
~pL •
~ V LO
4d)-
It
O
O
N
O
N
L
s~
O
V
O
U)
w
V
(1)
1
O
CL
0
c
fu
E
vn
C)
O
L.
CL
Q,
O
CL
tl)
N
rl
O
fC~
E
O
CU
O
J
"O
co
(n
i
O
O
rv
3:
m
O
oC
O
N
V
fu
O
I
.-J
U)
ro
L
O
t
0
4-JO
..O
ca
i
O
O
C
N
-6J
a
Q
O
N
J
U
fo
V
i
N
c
N
4-J
(n
T-i
N
O
O
U O
O
L 4-)
~ •N
H
ca ~
L
fU
N
O 4-J
~ O
O O
O fu
u O
U
O
O
4-)
U
O
H
"0
M (A
O 4-J
oC ~
~l
.s] >
O O
O Q
V H
0 0 0 0 0 0 O
h
4
L.GVI10IL.1I T a I Mir
Walnut Street (Tiedeman to 121st)
J
r 3 .+7 i ;MMARe~
17
~ s
OOOMOW-1.
-F-+
r
04
qr~
0
♦J
cu
E
0
W
. o
AW
W
~J
co
3:
0
a~
c~
c~
-o ~
o ~
~ o
o -o
~ o
4;
,
0
a)
cu
cu
U)
-0
CU
0
2~
C
a~ -0
C9 i~
.t,
mmmmpm~
re~►Brr.RY STRrP
Stteet
z (tA -
,i.
qty.
I
Lt~►►i1411't ~ ► KIN
H
n ~
►a~
street 10
dam
'i
T
J
O
O
-f-a
ti!
W
W
W
d~
{ F-
,sy~~',t ~ ~Y
00000%%
.6-a
0
E
If
W
CD
W
W
Q
O
com
O
E
Q
c
N
ti
Fy,;
CF)
O
O
E
D
a~
Q
N
ti
i
CL
O
~J
n~
W
U
C~
a~
Q
Cl)
qq~
N
CL
CL
O
-i-j
^W
W
L
U
0
a,
Q
r
N
T"m
~•T t
3
1~.
W
W
O
N
4-1
~
~
N
=3
T
s
_
P
V /
CD
co
0
-0
v
C=
U)
cu
'a ~
3:
C Y)
E
.m 0
_ >
O
o E
Q
~ U
C: cn
C
O
3:
CF)T
CIO
W
~v, W E
\ 0
o E
or. s
.0
~ U
cn
0
0 0
m
E
Ga O
t'n C O
O E6-
N Lo V L
=
~-1 m
0 c) c)
41 m 0 C) C)
=C)C:) op Oop -41 C) C)0
o o-O
mpo o.1
C) ma C)
r
~or o'o o
C) t~cca
Q~pM o
= (Q~V R~N
C) ( cO
AA- -L+ 4Q U) 4-j .ice i- n n -~v o
U) un
a Co v v c°
O I
L U4) OU~`.
V ~u®C0 0)
=3
U 45 :3
(V 0-0) cr (1) 07 07
Op L pC DC _ 0
0
4-0
OI
4-J • -J i 0
E ~ ~ c ~
0 co
O O O O
UJ
L
ASS 1::
4w
..e
H
O
ow
.~C
O
L
V
0
C/)
a
-6-+
1
O
V
O
E
s a
c n
LU I o
O
V
O
_
i
O
m
=
N
O
C)
°
O
°
C)
_
cri
o
o
°
00
L
~
V)
°
N
4
.o
o
~O
_
JCP
-
- •
N
m
AA
4J
o
~
=
O
• W
O
Cl)
::3
U
a~
07
a)
Cl)
-,-n
07
a)
L
(A
c
H
1.
CD
F-+
4-J
0
ME
O
Y
r
O
V
i
O
ow
N
CD o
O O
CD o 0
C) CD
kO X O N
409- N .
N
m (A +Pr
O =
0
V v U
cn O a~
07
.a; L E
O°-
ca L ca
4-0 U) 4-j
~ L E
O
N
Z
O
I
4-0
V
V
O
U
O L
O O
CD w 0 ~!7 N
L > 4-J (d jo V
O
cn W Z
cn co -fl 4-J
-0 4-J fo
s
0 L- 4-J
c p E O U) fa
it O N >
a)
C) Z;
d' N ~
O C:
N 0 w- 00 C O Q
a. -a 'N r~i V fo
N mc E E
a)
> U -0 s-• V
F- 0 v, n -
0 z 0=
4-1 u ~ cn 4-J U 4 • V O~
a U+
0 0 0 0 a) • L
V -a 0 o o O
-C a-' O O O O c~ U E
Ln a) ca C- 191-
~0c~E °
cNC
0
' =1 v) E =3 , :3 EL _0 O O ca 0 0 Ln O~
N
Q) E
® a V V V V
L- fu
L • • • • CO v) N
O O
A.
C
O
(a
N
O
V
fI)
Ova%
O
O
O
O
O
rl
V
3m
O
O
O
O
O
rt
i~-
V
Lon
O
O
O
O
O
N
V
OW
m
W
cn
Ism,
C
L
w
O O O
4
O
O
L..
Lm Ln
~ N
= N
~
V
~
a1
O
O
= p,
O
O
4
cn E
O
O H
x
A
O
L
~F
L
CL
L •w
u
cu
CD
4w
-W
= L
_
f
a
Agenda Item No.iV--I--
Meeting of. October 19, 2004
COMMUNICATION PLAN UPDATE
Council will receive materials for review in the Council Newsletter
October 15, 2004.
A COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION PLAN UPDATE WILL BE
AVAILABLE IN THE CITY RECORDER'S OFFICE
OCTOBER 15, 2004.
For more information, contact the City Recorder's Office at 503-639-4171
MEMORANDUM
Administration
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council /
FROM: Liz Newton, Assistant to the City Manager Vi
DATE: October 15, 2004
CITY OF TIGARD
Shaping A Better Community
SUBJECT: Update on the City's Communication Program and Proposed Enhanced
Community Connector Program
This memo provides an update on the status of many of the tools used to communicate
with citizens and promote their involvement in community issues. In addition, a
proposal to enhance the community connector program is outlined.
Focus on Tigard
Over the last six months, Focus on Tigard topics have included the Downtown Plan,
Budget 101, the Bull Mountain Annexation Plan, water conservation and supply, and
Traffic safety.
The October Focus on Tigard was a Tigard mayor and council candidates forum that
was taped in advance to air during the regular "Focus" time slot. The new format with
announcements closing the program allowed staff to tape the announcement portion of
the program the day after the Forum was taped.
Just over 4% of respondents to the recent Tigard Beyond Tomorrow Survey identified
cable programming, including Focus on Tigard as the most effective way to get
information about city events and issues.
Communications Plan
There continues to be an emphasis on developing communication plans when projects
and programs are initiated to ensure a proactive approach to communication and
information sharing. As an example, the Communication Plan currently being
implemented for the Downtown Plan is attached.
Press Releases
Staff continues to fax at least one press release per week to newspapers regarding a
current issue, event or program. Staff continues to track press releases and if they are
published, a report will be issued at the end of the year.
IM M\LIZ\Memos\Communication Plan update 101904 mtg.doc
Update on City's Communications Program and Proposed Enhanced Community Connector Program
-1-
Community Connectors
Regular communications continue.
The Vision Task Force members were asked to consider becoming community
connectors when communication was discussed at the Task Force meeting in April. As
part of the enhanced program, I propose all current Task Force and Board and
Committee members (that aren't already connected) be formally invited to become
connectors.
Cityscape
Cityscape continues to be distributed nine times a year. In the recent Tigard Beyond
Tomorrow Survey, Cityscape (and other mailed notices) was identified as the most
effective way for citizens to get information with other 28% preferring that method.
Web Site
In the last six months, visits to the city's web site peaked at 42,962 in August with a
decrease to 36,259 in September. The Tigard Beyond Tomorrow survey showed a
dramatic increase in the web page as a preferred method to communicate with citizens.
Around 6% indicated a preference for this method in 2000 with over 17% preferring the
web page as a communication tool in 2004.
Bulletin Board
Staff continues to place four to five new slides per month on the TVTV Bulletin Board.
The Bulletin Board is used primarily to highlight programs and events. In the last six
months, there were bulletins on the candidates forum, the Downtown Plan, library
program and library hours.
Enhanced Community Connector/Citizen Involvement Program
At the April 20 Council meeting, staff offered to bring back to Council a proposal to
expand the community connector program into an enhanced citizen involvement
program.
The City currently offers a number of opportunities for citizens to be involved from Task
Forces to volunteer opportunities to public meetings, to the police academy. Most of
these are city wide and don't focus on a local neighborhood area.
The city is also completing the second phase of the CAP program which conducts
assessments and follow-up on issues on a neighborhood unit. Although citizens in the
city view some issues from a citywide perspective, more often issues that affect citizens
on a day to day basis are unique to their neighborhood.
Staff proposes that the City combine some aspects of the Community Connector
Program and the CAP program into a "Community Connectors" program. The City
would be divided geographically into areas that share common interests.
I:WDM\LIMMemos\Communication Plan update 101904 mtg.doc
Update on City's Communications Program and 2 Proposed Enhanced Community.Connector Program
For example, areas bordered by the same major streets, are within a common
elementary school boundary, within a certain commercial service area, within walking
distance to the same park, have the same water service provider and waste hauler,
have organized neighborhood water. City police grids and public work areas could also
be overlayered. Citizens could also have the opportunity to add other neighborhood
features to be included in establishing the area boundaries.
The proposed map could then be reviewed by citizens in initial
informational/organizational meetings and adjustments made as suggested by citizens.
Each area could then have a citizen representative on the Committee for Citizen
Involvement. Citizens from each area could also serve as CAP liaisons, land use
contacts, neighborhood watch captains, community connectors and be CERT trained.
Connections could also be made to volunteer in the schools and on community projects.
The Capital Improvement Program process could incorporate recommendations from
each neighborhood and neighborhoods could organize community clean-ups and
beautification projects.
The purpose of the program would be to involve citizens as partners in addressing their
neighborhood issues and in the broadest range of issues as early as possible.
The current numbers of the CCI are in support of the concept in general. If Council
concurs with this direction, staff will work with the existing CCI members to expand its
membership and to develop a plan to begin working with the public to develop the
concept further.
I:WDM\LIZ\Memos\Communication Plan update 101904 mtg.doc
Update on City's Communications Program and 3 Proposed Enhanced Community Connector Program