Loading...
City Council Packet - 03/23/2004 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 23, 2004 COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED C i a 1:%0fsV) ma'.%copkl3 13125 SW Hail Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 E M1 Agenda Item No. L4 j Meeting of JA-9-7-0!1 COUNCIL MINUTES TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 23, 2004 Mayor Dirksen called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Council Present: Mayor Dirksen; Councilors Moore, Sherwood, Wilson, and Woodruff. • STUDY SESSION > ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS a. Councilor Nick Wilson has been selected as the MPAC Alternate to Mayor Richard Kidd, representing the smaller cities in Washington County. b. Council discussed the process for Agenda Item No. 7: Presentation of Preliminary Engineer's Report for the Proposed Wall Street Local Improvement District. City Engineer Duenas will present the Preliminary Engineer's Report; however, his recommendation will be to postpone asking the Council to make a decision on whether to consider a resolution of intent to form the district until some time after April 7. On April 7, City staff will meet with the Oregon Department of Transportation for a pre-hearing session on the request for a permit to cross over the railroad tracks. No public testimony will be received tonight. City Attorney Ramis confirmed that he could update Council and the staff on the terms of the library property sale agreement with Fred Fields during the Business Meeting discussion of Agenda Item 7. The first 425-feet of Wall Street, which intersects at Hall Boulevard, will be constructed for the Library access and is separate from the LID process. Recent e-mail communications received by Council regarding the proposed Wall Street LID were distributed to the Council members. c. Calendar Review • March 31 - Retirement Dinner for Joe Grisham - 5 p.m. - Tigard Senior Center • April 5 - Joint Meeting with TTSD and City of Tualatin City Council - 6:30 p.m. • April 7 - Employee Recognition Event - 3-4 p.m. Town Hail - Councilors Moore and Sherwood indicated they planned to attend; Mayor Dirksen and Councilors Woodruff and Wilson will check their schedules. • April 13 - Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - March 23, 2004 Page 1 • April 20 - Council Workshop Meeting - 6:30 p.m. • April 27 - Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. d. Tualatin Valley Television program: "Talk of the Town." In response to a question from Assistant to the City Manager Newton regarding possible Tigard features, the "Downtown" and "Water" were suggested. e. Agenda Item No. 9 references the draft Metro Survey regarding a "Community's Sense of Place." This survey was discussed by Council on March 16. Staff prepared a letter that was signed by Planning Commission President Padgett. This letter was distributed to the Council and Is on file with the City Recorder. f. Mayor Dirksen advised that he had been asked to welcome the Hindu Spiritual leader who Is arriving soon in Los Angeles from India. A Hindu ashram was recently built In Tigard. After talking to the Oregon Government Standards and Practices Commission, Mayor Dirksen decided he should not go to Los Angeles as a guest of local ashram members. > EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went Into Executive Session at 6:45 p.m. under ORS 192.660 (1) (f) to consider records that are "exempt by law from public inspection." Executive Session concluded at 6:56 p.m. > Goal 5 Update Associate Planner Roberts presented information on this item. Tigard and nine other Washington County cities (Basin Partners) have joined with the County, Clean Water Services, and the Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District to develop a fish and wildlife protection plan for the Tualatin River Basin. This collaborative effort is being undertaken in cooperation with Metro. Two open houses have been scheduled to present information about the draft analyses of watershed health and the partners' site-specific recommendations on fish and wildlife habitat protection. A public hearing where citizens can provide input on the recommendations is scheduled for March 29, 2004. Associate Planner Roberts reviewed information on riparian areas (adjacent to streams) and wildlife resources, which included Tigard's existing map of sensitive areas. The Basin Partners have accepted the sensitive lands inventory. Mr. Roberts spoke about the Environmental Social Economic Energy (ESEE) analysis review of Impact areas (inner and outer impact areas adjacent to streams). Conceptual decisions are being finalized by the Basin Partners. He also reviewed conflicting use Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - March 23, 2004 Page 2 categories for high-intensity urban, other urban, future urban and non urban areas. A chart has been developed for areas that will "Allow Conflicting Uses," "Limit Conflicting Uses," and "Prohibiting Conflicting Uses" (ALP). The deflnitions for the uses and classifications for the ALP chart are conceptual at this time. Associate Planner Roberts referred to the March 29 hearing (see first paragraph above). Council discussion followed. Councilor Wilson Is Tigard's representative to the Basin Partners and he said other cities appear to have already formulated opinions on the Basin Partner's recommendation. He referred to the "fair amount" of protection Tigard already has in place for sensitive lands. Councilor Wilson was concerned that he was not prepared to cast a vote on this matter after the public hearing on March 29. A citizen from the audience, Brian Wegener, indicated that he thought the hearing was to be on the 29°i of March; however, the Basin Partners were not scheduled to take a flnal vote on Its recommendations for fish and wildlife habitat protection until April 12. The Planning Commission's recommendation to Council was to support the adoption of the Goal 5 ALP general recommendation, conditional upon Metro making changes to its sensitive lands inventory map, and to explicitly recognize the preliminary designations and deflnidons of the ALP chart are not yet developed. Council discussion followed on what its position might be. Mr. Wegener questioned why the Council would take a position before the March 29 public hearing. Councilor Wilson plans to attend the hearing. Study Session concluded at 7:33 p.m. 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Mayor Dirksen called the City Council 81 Local Contract Review Board to order at 7:40 p.m. 1.2 Mayor Dirksen and Council Members Moore, Sherwood, Wilson, and Woodruff were present. Also present: Tigard Youth Advisory Council r President Boyce. ? 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications 8i Liaison Reports: None i 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items: None i 2. PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Dirksen read the two proclamations fisted below: 2.1 Proclaiming April 15, 2004 as Arbor Day 2.2 Proclaiming April 12-18, 2004 as National Community Development Week Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - March 23, 2004 Page 3 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA • Mr. David Crosswhite testified noting his appreciation for the Council's efforts to make Tigard a livable City. He especially thanked the City for the sewer reimbursement district program, which is an affordable way for homeowners to eliminate septic systems. Mr. Crosswhite suggested that the City look at addressing storm drainage issues at the same time the reimbursement district Is formed for the Edgewood area. He recited some of the past problems with storm drainage. A copy of a letter outlining Mr. Crosswhite's comments to Council is on file with the City Recorder. Mr. Crosswhite's concerns/suggestions will be reviewed by City Engineer Duenas who will then report his recommendations to Council. (Note: Susan Murray signed in to speak to Council on the Wall Street Extension. Staff had advised Ms. Murray that no public testimony would be entertained by Council on this matter at this meeting. A public hearing will be scheduled if the Council decides to pursue formation of the Local Improvement District for the Wall Street Extension.) • Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce President Dan Murphy was present and announced upcoming Chamber of Commerce events. In response to an inquiry from Councilor Sherwood, Chamber President Murphy said he would follow up with regard to Chamber members' participation in talks with the Oregon Department of Transportation about traffic issues and the need for traffic improvements In Tigard. 4. PRESENTATION OF CRYSTAL AWARD FOR THE KOREAN WAR VIDEO • Tualatin Valley Television (TVTV) Executive Director Marc! Hosier presented the Crystal Award, which City of Tigard and TVTV received for its production of a Korean War 501 Anniversary documentary video. Carol McAndrew, a former volunteer for the City of Tigard, was instrumental in producing the video. Ms. McAndrew said a few words, praising the City's volunteer program and the opportunity to work on the video with TVTV staff member Josh Anderson. The Council and audience viewed a few minutes of the documentary. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: Council approved the Consent Agenda as follows: 5.1 Approve Council Minutes for February 24, 2004 5.2 Approve Budget Amendment No. 18 to the FY 2003-04 Budget to Increase Appropriations for Funding of the Implementation of the Billing for the Street Maintenance Fee - Resolution No. 04 -17 Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - March 23, 2004 Page 4 5.3 Appoint Initial Members to the Planned Development Review Committee - Resolution No. 04 - 18 5.4 Approve Right-of-Way Dedication for SW 681 Parkway Right of Way - Resolution No. 04 - 19 5.5 Local contract Review Board: a. Award Contract for an Automated Inspection Request System to Selection Technologies, Inc. b. Award Contract for the Construction of FY 2003-04 Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation Program to Planned and Engineered Construction, Inc. 6. ACKNOWLEDGE THE LEADERSHIP AND DEDICATED COMMUNITY SERVICE RENDERED BY JOSEPH GRISHAM, POLICE LIEUTENANT FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD FROM MARCH 16, 1997, TO MARCH 31, 2004 Assistant Chief Orr presented the staff report on this Item and noted the distinguished career of retiring Lt. Grisham. Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Sherwood, to adopt Resolution No. 04-20. RESOLUTION NO. 04-20 - A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACKNOWLEDGING THE EXCELLENT LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNITY SERVICE RENDERED BY JOSEPH GRISHAM, POLICE LIEUTENANT FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD FORM MARCH 16, 1977 TO MARCH 31, 2004 The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present: Mayor Dlrksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Sherwood - Yes Councilor Wilson - Yes Councilor Woodruff - Yes Mayor Dirksen read the text of the resolution. 7. PRESENTATION OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED WALL STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT City Engineer Duenas presented the staff report on this item and the PowerPoint slide presentation noting the highlights of his report, which is on file with the City Recorder. After discussion, consensus of Council was to agree with the staff recommendation to delay a decision until the hearing on the crossing is completed. Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes March 23, 2004 Page 5 (This item was also discussed during the Study Session portion of this meeting, see Page 1.) City Attorney Ramis, in response to an inquiry from Councilor Woodruff, advised that the agreement between the City of Tigard and Mr. Fred Fields (for purchase of the new library site) specifies that the City is to pursue, In good faith, the possibility of forming an LID for the Wall Street extension. Once ODOT renders a decision on whether or not to allow a railroad crossing, staff will report the results to Council and the Council may consider other options or decide at that time to terminate the LID proceedings. If the Council moves forward with formation of an LID, a public hearing will be conducted. 8. REVIEW POLICE YOUTH PROGRAMS Assistant Chief Orr, Lt. Rhodes, Officer Eskew, and Officer Huiras presented information on police youth programs. The School Resource Officer Program (SRO) provides many valuable resources for Tigard's youth, the schools, and the community. The SRO provides the response for emergency and criminal incidents that occur within the schools for 7,366 students. Programs highlighted in the presentation to Council Included Drug Abuse Resistance Education Classes (DARE), Gang Resistance Education 8z Training (GREAT), DARE to be GREAT Summer Camp, and Women's Self=Defense Classes. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation viewed by the Council is on file with the City Recorder. 9. REVIEW FINAL DRAFT OF METRO SURVEY: PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES OF A COMMUNITY'S SENSE OF PLACE Council received a copy of the letter (signed by Planning Commission President Padgett) sent to Metro. This matter was discussed by Council at its March 16, 2004, workshop meeting. 10. UPDATE ON MEDIATION SERVICES Assistant to the City Manager Newton presented a report to the City Council on the mediation services provided by the City through the Beaverton Dispute Resolution Center. This service is offered at no charge to Tigard residents and has a satisfaction rating of 95%. A copy of the highlights of Ms. Newton's presentation is on file with the City Recorder. 11. REVIEW METRO'S HIGHWAY 217 NEEDS AND VALUES SURVEY City Engineer Duenas presented Council with a compilation of their individual responses to the Metro Highway 217 Needs and Values Survey. Consensus of Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - March 23, 2004 Page 6 Council was for the City Engineer to combine the Council's response and forward It to Metro under cover of a letter from Mayor Dirksen. 12. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS Councilor Moore asked to be placed on the next City Council agenda to update Council on the Highway 217 Advisory Committee and the Policy Committee for the Tualatin River Basin (Hagg Lake dam raise). 13. NON AGENDA ITEMS: None 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Not held. 15. ADJOURNMENT: 9:16 p.m. Catherine Wheatley, Cityecorde Attest: ayo , ty o gar Date: -9 a7. Qd 1:ladm\cathytccm120041040323.doc Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - March 23, 2004 Page 7 City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of Posting CITY OF TIGARD In the Matter of the Proposed Notice of Special Meeting OREGON STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, /L H 6/1,-) ZZ1 A , being first duly sworn (or affirmed), by oath (or affirmation), depose and say: That on IV/Iff~ LIq 1C'CI4 at Z { p.m.`' I posted in Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, a copy of Notice of Special Meeting for the City Council meeting of 14P, l L Jr , 1- with a copy of said Notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the /,?j day of .2064 Signature of Person who Performed Posting S bscribed and sw rx (or firmed) before me this day of Z111 A A A/-? f , 20~ Signat a of Not "-vblic for Oregon OFFICIAL SEAL JBENGTSON NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. 368W6 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR. 27, 2007 :\ADM\GREER\FORMS\AFFIDAVITSV\FFIDAVLT OF POSTING - SPECIAL MEETING.DOC CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please forward to: O/Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-620-3433) 2i'Steve Lindsley, Regal Courier, (Fax No. 503-968-7397) Newsroom, The Oregonian, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-968-6061) April 5, 2004 - 6:30 p.m. Tualatin Police Facility 8650 Tualatin Road Tualatin, Oregon Notice Is hereby given that a meeting is planned between the Tigard City Council, the Tualatin City Council and the Tigard-Tualatin School District to discuss issues of mutual concern. Meeting topics will include: ■ Update on Construction Activity ■ Update on Visioning Program in the City of Tualatin ■ Gang Activity Report ■ Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge ■ Bridgeport Road Closure For further information, please contact City Recorder Cathy Wheatley by calling 503-639-4171, ext. 2410. City Recorder Post: City Hall Lobby Date of Notice: March 18, 2004 I:\ADM\CATHY\CCA\CC MTG NOTICESWOTICE SPEC MTG 040405.DOC City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of Notification CITY OF TIGARD OREGON In the Matter of the Proposed Notification of Special Meeting STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard I, ___6 ) /ZI<E L_ being first duly sworn (or affirmed), by oath (or affirmation), depose and say: That on 1 " 10 ~ 9 f7" _ 16 , ;wQ q at Z JD . / I notified the following people/ organizations by fax of the Special Meeting of the City Council on aIOQ l L , 2-004, with a copy of the Notice of Special Meeting being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the /Q~ Y17_.__ day of _ *'-I I~ O N.__ 20 0-4 Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724) V iteve Lindsley, Regal Courier, (Fax No. 503-968-7397) ewsroom, The Oregonian, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-968-6061) Signature of Person who Performed Notification Subscrib d and sn (or affirmed) before me this day of JU [1.411-( ~ ' ? OFFICIAL SEAL Signatu of Not blic for Oregon n J BENGTSON f` NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. 368086 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR. 27, 2007 y - I I I 1 0 03 8/2004 14:23 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard Q001 sss*s*sssssss***ssss****sss*ss sss MULTI TX/RX REPORT sss sssxssssssxxxssssxxsssssxxxsss TX/RX NO 2783 PGS. 1 TX/RX INCOMPLETE TRANSACTION OK [ 0915039686061 Oregonian [ 1115039687397 Regal Courier ERROR INFORMATION [ 0615035460724 IT Newsroom CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please forward to: Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-620-3433) 0 "Steve Undsley, Regal Courier, (Fax No. 503-968-7397) Rr Newsroom, The Oregonian, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-968-6061) April 5, 2004 - 6:30 p.m. Tualatin Police Facility 8650 Tualatin Road Tualatin, Oregon Notice is hereby given that a meeting is planned between the Tigard City Council, the Tualatin City Council and the Tigard-Tualatin School District to discuss issues of mutual concern. Meeting topics will Include: ■ Update on Construction Activity ■ Update on Visioning Program In the City of Tualatin ■ Gang Activity Report ■ Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge ■ Bridgeport Road Closure For further Information, please contact City Recorder Cathy Wheatley by calling 503-639-4171, ext. 2410. c~~ tee.. r• . City Recorder i CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please forward to: ZBarbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-620-3433) 0"Steve Lindsley, Regal Courier, (Fax No. 503-968-7397) Newsroom, The Oregonian, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-968-6061) April 5, 2004 - 6:30 p.m. Tualatin Police Facility 8650 Tualatin Road Tualatin, Oregon Notice is hereby given that a meeting is planned between the Tigard City Council, the Tualatin City Council and the Tigard-Tualatin School District to discuss Issues of mutual concern. Meeting topics will include: ■ Update on Construction Activity ■ Update on Visioning Program in the City of Tualatin ■ Gang Activity Report ■ Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge ■ Bridgeport Road Closure For further information, please contact City Recorder Cathy Wheatley by calling 503-639-4171, ext. 2410. City Recorder Post: City Hall Lobby Date of Notice: March 18, 2004 1MDM\CATHY\CCA\CC MTG NOTICESWOTICE SPEC MTG 040405.DOC Revised 3118/04 Mayor's Agenda TIGARD; CITY COUNCIL EET-1NG MARCH`23'; 2004' ~;>34' p.m: CITY OF TIGARD OREGON T -IGARD CITY HAEL. . 13'125 ~S1N HALL BLVD . TIhARI7,.OR 97223. PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet Is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested In testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard In any order after 7:30 p.m. Assisdve Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TODD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503- 684-2772 (TODD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). -SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 23, 2004 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 23, 2004 6:30 PM • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (1) (f) to consider records that are "exempt by law from public inspection." All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. • STUDY SESSION > Goal 5 Update • Staff Report: Community Development Staff 7:30 PM i . BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council 8T Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications 8t Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 7:35 PM 2. PROCLAMATIONS 2.1 Proclaim April IS, 2004 as Arbor Day 2.2 Proclaim April 12-18, 2004 as National Community Development Week Mayor Dirksen 7:40 PM 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce President Dan Murphy 7:50 PM 4. PRESENTATION OF CRYSTAL AWARD FOR THE KOREAN WAR VIDEO Tualatin Valley Television Executive Director Marc! Hosier COUNCIL AGENDA -MARCH 23, 2004 page 2 8..00 PM 5. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted In one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 5.1 Approve Council Minutes for February 24, 2004 5.2 Approve Budget Amendment No. 18 to the FY 2003-04 Budget to Increase Appropriations for Funding of the Implementation of the Billing for the Street Maintenance Fee - Resolution No. 04 -17 5.3 Appoint Initial Members to the Planned Development Review Committee - Resolution No. 04 - 18 5.4 Approve Right-of-Way Dedication for SW 681 Parkway Right of Way - Resolution No. 04 - 19 5.5 Local contract Review Board: a. Award Contract for an Automated Inspection Request System to Selection Technologies, Inc. b. Award Contract for the Construction of FY 2003-04 Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation Program to Planned and Engineered Construction, Inc. • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 8:05 PM 6. ACKNOWLEDGE THE LEADERSHIP AND DEDICATED COMMUNITY SERVICE RENDERED BY ]OSEPH GRISHAM, POLICE LIEUTENANT FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD FROM MARCH 16, 1997, TO MARCH 31, 2004 a. Staff Report: Police Staff b. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 04 - 20 Councilor. I move for adoption of the proposed Resolution 04- Councilor. I second the motion. Mayor., Will the City Recorder please read the number and title of the Resolution. CityRecorder: (Reads as requested.) Mayor: Is there any discussion? COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 23, 2004 page 3 Mayor (after discussion): All of those in favor of adopting Resolution No._-, please say "aye. " Mayor/Councilors: Mayor. All of those opposed to adopting Resolution No. , please say "nay. " Mayor/Councilors: Mayor. Resolution No. 04-20 (is adopted or fails) by a (unanimous, or however votes were split) vote. Tie votes = failed motion. BOOM 7. PRESENTATION OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED WALL STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT a. Staff Report: Engineering Staff b. Council Discussion C. Council Consideration: Provide direction to staff regarding the proposed Local Improvement District as Directed by Tigard City Council Resolution No. 02- 11 8:40 PM 8. REVIEW POLICE YOUTH PROGRAMS a. Staff Report: Police Staff 9:00 PM 9. REVIEW FINAL DRAFT OF METRO SURVEY: PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES OF A COMMUNITY'S SENSE OF PLACE a. Staff Report: Community Development Staff b. Council Consideration: Direct staff to send the final draft of the survey to Metro 9:10 PM 10. UPDATE ON MEDIATION SERVICES ' a. Staff Report: Administration Staff 9:20 PM 11. REVIEW METRO'S HIGHWAY 217 NEEDS AND VALUES SURVEY a. Staff Report: Engineering Staff 9:30 PM 12. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 23, 2004 page 4 13. NON AGENDA ITEMS 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any Information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9:50 PM 1 S. ADJOURNMENT 1:\ADM\CATHY\CCA\2004\040323.DOC COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 23, 2004 page 5 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING - STUDY SESSION March 23, 2004 - 6:30 p.m. 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon The Study Session Is Field to the Red Rock Creek Conference Room. Enter at the back of Town Hall. The Council encourages Interested ddzens to attend all or part of the meeting. If the number of attendees exceeds the capacity of the Conference Room, the Council may move the Study Session to the Town Hall. 6:30 PM • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go Into Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (1) (f) to consider records that are "exempt by law from public Inspection." All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. • STUDY SESSION > Goal 5 Update • Staff Report: Community Development Staff > ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS a. Councilor Nick Wilson has been selected as the MPAC Alternate to Mayor Richard Kidd, representing the smaller cities In Washington County. b. Discuss Process for Agenda Item No. 7: Presentation of Preliminary Engineer's Report for the Proposed Wall Street Local Improvement DWcL • Distribute recent e-mail communications received regarding the proposed Wall Street LID C. Calendar Review • March 23 - Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. • March 31 - Retirement Dinner for ]oe Grisham - 5 p.m. - Tigard Senior Center • April 5 - joint Meeting with TTSD and City of Tualatin City Council - 6:30 p.m. • April 7 - Employee Recognition Event - 3-4 p.m. Town Hall - • April 13 - Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. • April 20 - Council Workshop Meeting- 6:30 p.m. • April 27 - Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. ~t s D Execudve Session - The Public Meetings Law authorizes governing bodies to meet In executive session In certain limited situations (ORS 192.660). An "executive session" is defined as "any meeting or part of a meeting of a governing body, which is closed to certain persons for deliberation on certain matters." Permissible Purposes for Executive Sessions: 192.660(l) (a) - Employment of public officers, employees and agents, If the body has satisfied certain prerequisites. 192.660(l) (b) - Discipline of public officers and employees (unless affected person requests to have an open hearing). 192.660(l) (c) - To consider matters pertaining to medical staff of a public hospital. 192.640 (1) (d) - Labor negotiations. (News media can be excluded in this Instance.) 192.660(l) (e) - Real property transaction negotiations. 192.6600) (0- Exempt public records - to consider records that are "exempt by law from public inspection." These records are specifically identified In the Oregon Revised Statutes. 192-660(l) (g) - Trade negotiations - Involving matters of trade or commerce in which the governing body is competing with other governing bodies. 192.660(l) (h) - Legal counsel - Executive session are appropriate for consultation with counsel concerning legal rights and duties regarding current litigation or litigation likely to be flied. 192.660(l) (1) - To review and evaluate, pursuant to standards, criteria, and policy directives adopted by the governing body, the employment-related performance of the chief executive officer, a public officer, employee or staff member unless the affected person requests an open hearing. The standards, criteria and policy directives to be used In evaluating chief executive officers shall be adopted by the governing body in meetings open to the public in which there has been an opportunity for public comment. 192.660 (1) Public investments - to carry on negotiations under ORS Chapter 293 with private persons or businesses regarding proposed acquisition, exchange or liquidation of public Investments. 192.660 (1) (k)- Relates to health professional regulatory board. M8&M=&*VWX9r0* ShW-. *"SSan.GxWe,~2W+,Of022,.i we Page 1 of 2 Cathy Wheatley - RE: MPAC Appointment ..vn,...-rYiY/Oi!(dYORlo4S^'-i••°•-•• ~'•...:~5..^-.a.:C:4A6Q`.5-LTK-ST3LTS°~Su':YCiiY{:YC~IZ.:T.'(Ft A~.Y_vt:':'JSI:S=S iT ^~.5:~:.h~_'R~:• From: "Patrick Ribellia" <patrickr@ci.hillsboro.or.us> To: <pdgibbs@teleport.com>, <cityofdurham@comcast.net>, <lou.ogden@juno.com>, <etruax@pearsonfinancial.com>, <mayor@ci.tigard.or.us>, <15300116@msn.com>, <sheinrich@ci.cornelius.or.us>, <asheckla-cox@ci.cornelius.or.us>, <germac@gte.net>, < roneshay@verizon. net>, <mark@cottie.com>, < richard@groveweb. net> Date: 3/22/2004 2:33 PM Subject: RE: MPAC Appointment CC: "Tom Brian" <Tom_Brian@co.washington.or.us>, <rdrake@ci.beaverton.or.us>, "Tom Hughes" <tomh@ci.hillsboro.or.us>, "Kim Bardes" <bardes@metro.dst.or.us> AII: Mayor Hughes asked me to Inform you of the recent selection by each smaller city in Washington County of an MPAC Alternate to Mayor Richard Kidd representing the smaller cities in the County. All the smaller cities In the County and Metro jurisdictional boundary have cast their votes with the following result: By a 4-3 margin, Tigard City Councilor Nick Wilson was chosen to be the MPAC Alternate to Mayor Richard Kidd. Mayor Hughes will Inform Metro of the selection immediately and ask that it be confirmed by MPAC at the earliest available MPAC meeting (hopefully this Wednesday nite). Thank you. Pat. Ribellia -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Ribellia Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 7:32 AM To: 'pdgibbs@teleport.com'; 'cityofdurham@comcast.net'; 'lou.ogden@juno.com'; 'etruax@pearsonrinancial.com'; 'mayor@ci.tigard.or.us'; '15300116@msn.com'; 'sheinrich@ci.cornelius.or.us'; 'asheckla-cox@ci.cornelius.or.us'; 'germac@gte.net; 'roneshay@verizon.net'; 'mark@cottle.com'; 'richard@groveweb.net' Cc: Tom Brian';'rdrake@ci.beaverton.or.us'; Tom Hughes Subject: RE: MPAC Appointment Aik Today was supposed to be the last day for informing Mayor Hughes on your jurisdiction's choice or selection for MTAC Alternate for the smaller cities in Washington County. The choice are City Councilor Nick Wilson (Tigard) and City Councilor Amy-Schekla Cox (Cornelius). Thus far we have heard from the Cities of Tigard, Durham, Cornelius and Forest Grove. We have not heard from the Cities of Sherwood, Tualatin and King City. Please inform us of your choice by Monday, 5:OOPM as Mayor Hughes wants to have the Alternative Position filled by the next MPAC meeting next Wednesday, March 24th. If each candidate receives the same number of votes at 5:00PM next Monday, Mayor Hughes will confer with the other MPAC members from Washington County on how to resolve the voting deadlock. Thank you for your attention to this notice. Pat. Ribellia ---Original Message----- From: Patrick Ribellia Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 7:22 AM To: 'pdgibbs@teleport.com'; 'cityofdurham@comcast.net'; 'lou.ogden@juno.com'; 'etruax@pearsonfinancial.com'; 'mayor@ci.tigard.or.us'; '15300116@msn.com'; 'sheinrich@ci.corneilus.or.us'; 'asheckla-cox@ci.cornelius.or.us'; 'germac@gte.net; 'roneshay@verizon.ner; 'mark@cottle.com'; 'richard@groveweb. net' Cc: Tom Brian'; rdrake@ci.beaverton.or.us; Tom Hughes file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Cathy.000\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW } 00008.... 3/23/2004 • Page 2 of 2 Subject: MPAC Appointment Ali: Mayor Tom Hughes asked that the attached communication regarding appointment of an elected official from one of the following cities (Durham, King City, Tualatin, Tigard, Sherwood, Cornelius or Forest Grove) to fill the seat of "MPAC Alternate" for the smaller cities In Washington County formerly held by Tigard Mayor Jim Griffith until he passed away recently. The procedures and requirements to be met to fill that seat are explained in the communication. Thank you. Pat. Mbeilia 1 file://C:\Documents%2Oand%2OSettings\Cathy.000\Local%2OSettings\Temp\GW )00008.... 3/23/2004 Page 1 of 1 council mail counciimail - Proposed Wall Street Extension over Fanno Creek ..:9JSr.,~S~G`Cnv..aCr. .%.cn:•...:n:,..ieu•[!!1da7M1Si3Y.'FiGFS14t'KS?eF.tW4TNh`3u;~-w!,a... ;cT,'.ti'_.. L,,. _ ..w From: "Peake, Fran" <Fran@peakem.com> To: "'craigd@ci.tigard.or.us"' <craigd@ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 3/22/2004 3:39 PM Subject: Proposed Wall Street Extension over Fanno Creek Mayor Dirksen, We all know that we cannot stop growth, but we can plan well and do it right the first time around. Planning well takes into account the responses to the Tigard Visioning Survey. I understand a very large percentage of respondents belived saving open spaces was more important then going along with development requests. Also, this site is on the target list for Metro Greenspaces acquisitions for the Fanno Creek Corridor. These are but a couple of reasons not to make any regrettable decisions regarding this space now in a rush to push it through for the benefit of a few. Fran Peake i i i file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Cathy.000\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW) 00007.... 3/23/2004 Page 1 of 1 council mail councilmail - Preserving Fanno Creek - ,eaarocxxretinns.ra.e,~ +a:.,:_~.:~•:x.•.:,«c,r~+:.:~a~:: •,:.~•.a:w,:~.~rs~~c~v~;uvrxra,.tscv%~xa~rv:.«rs~:w::sx:_r~t.~_:w:r;,uw From: "Bruce Warner" <bwarner@colortechnoiogy.com> To: <craigd@d.tigard.or.us> Date: 3/22/2004 10:32 PM Subject: Preserving Fanno Creek I am alarmed and dismayed that the city of Tigard Is even considering encroaching on one of our last large remaining wetlands area with a proposed road. The people of Tigard, Metzger and Bull Mtn. moved to this area because It has some good open spaces, parks and several year round streams and creeks. The Wall SL project is not what the people of Tigard want. Check the surveys that have been done and ask people yourself. We need to stop the overdevelopment of Tigard and begin to recognize that the open spaces we have now are our best insurance of a livable city in the future. PLEASE listen to your constituents and voters--we don't want and don't need this road. I appreciate your consideration. Bruce Warner 8025 SW Elmwood St. 503-244-7035 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Cathy.000\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW) 00007.... 3/23/2004 R• council mail councilmail - Help Save Habitat on Fanno Creek in Tigard Page 1 From: "Brian Wegener" <bdan@tualatinriverkeepers.org> To: "'Tualatin Riverkeepers & Friends'" <brian.wegener@tualatinriverkeepers.org> Date: 3/22/04 3:07PM Subject: Help Save Habitat on Fanno Creek in Tigard For two years now Tualatin Riverkeepers have opposed Tigard's proposed Wall Street extension, a project that would build a road through some of the last best habitat on Fanno Creek. The area is known to have western pond turtles, a species on the Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife critical list. On Tuesday March 23 the Tigard City Council will once again consider the Wall Street Extension over Fanno Creek. At the meeting, the council will be reviewing the latest preliminary engineering report and directing the city staff whether or not to proceed with formation of the Local Improvement District to fund the project. Tualatin Riverkeepers has consistently advocated for alternative projects that would have far more benefits for traffic circulation, pedestrian safety, wildlife passage and flood prevention. The project is strongly opposed by owners of the railroad tracks that parallel Fanno Creek. The City Council meeting is at 7:00pm on Tuesday March 23. We are asking Tualatin Riverkeepers members and friends to come to the meeting and ask the City Council to stop the project, and pursue alternative projects that protect habitat and open spaces. Key points to bring up: In the Tigard Visioning Survey, 86% of respondents said it was more important to preserve open space than to accommodate new development. Alternative transportation projects benefit traffic, safety, wildlife and flood prevention. These alternatives are described in the Tigard TransportatiomPlan and the Fanno Creek Management Plan. The proposed at-grade railroad crossing is unsafe, and would expose people to dangers of a rail crossing that will soon have frequent traffic from commuter rail. The site is on the target list for Metro Greenspaces acquisitions for the Fanno Creek Corridor. The site is known to harbor the western pond turtle, a species on ODFW's critical list. Roads kill turtles. Tigard City Council Meeting - March 23, 2004 - 7:00pm Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Send your e-mail to Mayor Craig Dirksen: craigd@ci.tigard.or.us For more information see: Save Tigard's Turtles - Stop the Wall Street Extension: council mall counciimail - Help Save Habitat on Fanno Creek in Tigard Page 2 http:/ w iw.tualatinriverkeepers.org/tigardturties/turUes.htm Tualatin Riverkeepers' letter to Tigard City Council: http://www.tualatinriverkeepers.org/tigardturties/b*gardletter.doc Tigard City Council Agenda: httpJ/www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_halYcity munciYdocs/agendas/040323Age nda.pdf City Council Packet including the Preliminary Engineering Report (10.5 Mb): http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/city_halYcity_cou ncil/docs/packets/040323Pac ket.pdf Division of State Lands Wetland Fill Permit Application (12 Mb): http://www.statelandsonline.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Comments.ShowPDF&id =31719&sm=1 Brian Wegener Watershed Watch Coordinator Tualatin Riverkeepers 16507 SW Roy Rogers Road Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: 503.590.5813 Fax: 503.590.6702 E-mail: brian@tualatinriverkeepers.org Website: www.tualaUnriverkeepers.org Protect, restore, enjoy the Tualatin River and its tributaries. Become a member of the Tualatin Riverkeepers. e Page 1 of 1 council mail councilmail - Tigard's Wall Street expansion proposal ~ ..'::3:?:[AiJR29CKM1F:Yi:i:i7.'+.2r.Fi 6'Sx4'LVn17GWivl : NG~~CiD+S"i6•wY.i`V'Fffi~7:~.'t :`5!i:~JfiY+'u'.F.'•uit C7T"~ :~:fS::::.{'..~L'::1°.1'u:tls:~..:1'LZt..i u.::.ll::'?:".w✓.'I.~kiALJ'A~.:':.~::w.~ ^r.:2.-1 From: "Carver, Lynn W <lynn.m.carver@office.xerox.com> To: '%raigd@ci.tigard.or.us"' <craigd@ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 3/23/2004 9:37 AM Subject: Tigard's Wall Street expansion proposal Mayor Dirksen: I am a member of the Tualatin Riverkeepers. I also live on the Tualatin River in unincorporated Tualatin, Clackamas County. I am an avid paddler on the river. During the last 17 years I have watched and participated in the Riverkeepers' projects to clean up and protect the Tualatin River basin. In our cities development efforts, the path of least resistance is not always the best path to take. We must consider our environment and our neighborhoods. I understand that this expansion proposal will further endanger Fanno Creek habitat, specifically one of its inhabitants - the western pond turtle, a species on the Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife critical list. The Tualatin Riverkeepers have consistently advocated over the last two years for alternative projects that would have far more benefits for traffic circulation, pedestrian safety, wildlife passage and flood prevention. In the Tigard Visioning Survey, 86% of respondents said it was more Important to preserve open space than to accommodate new development Proposed alternative transportation options benefit traffic, safety, wildlife and flood prevention. These alternatives are described in the Tigard Transportation Plan and the Fanno Creek Management Plan. In addition to habitat endangerment, the proposed at- grade railroad crossing is unsafe and would expose people to dangers of a rail crossing that will soon have frequent traffic from commuter rail. I hope your meeting on March 23, 2004 at Tigard City Hall will be a forum where all will have open minds to not only what is financially beneficial but ecologically beneficial and safe for humans and the natural inhabitants of Fanno Creek. Regards, Lynn M. Carver file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Cathy.000\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW } 00007.... 3/23/2004 Page 1 of 1 Cathy Wheatley - Retirement Dinner From: Ellen Fox To: Date: 3/23/2004 10:27 AM Subject: Retirement Dinner Please join us on Wednesday, March 31st, as we honor Lt. Joe Grisham, who is retiring after 27 years of service to Tigard PD and the Citizens of this community. A lasagna dinner will be held starting at 5 pm at the Tigard Senior Center. There will be some presentations made and this will be a chance to toast or roast him, and to thank him for all his contributions to this Department. We will miss Joe and his great sense of humor. Hope you can join us as we say "Farewell." RSPV to Ellen by March 26th, if you plan to attend the dinner. Or you can show up at 6 pm for presentations and cake without an RSVP. Thanks, Ellen file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Cathy.000\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW } 00007.... 3/23/2004 Item No. 2. For Council Meeting of --23 t 11 ,awvr., fj~ PROCLAMATION Arbor Days April 15, 2004 WHEREAS, In 1872, Arbor Day, a special day set aside for the planting of trees, was first celebrated In Nebraska; and I~t i WHEREAS, Tigard's urban forest of public and private parks and greenways is part of a larger , i ecology that spans from mountains to ocean and is integral to our region's water quality; and WHEREAS, our urban forest includes a diversity of trees that grace our city streets, parks and <'L} greenways, provide habitat for wildlife, soften hardscapes, clean the air, protect water resources, and ensure that everyone can experience natural beauty where we live, work and recreate; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard recognizes that our urban forest Is a necessity and is an integral part of the city's infrastructure and ecosystems; and t ?9QII~ WHEREAS, we are committed to provide resources to maintain and enhance the urban ; i forest; and ' 'r WHEREAS, people of all ages and backgrounds, including citizens, civic organizations, businesses and city agencies, have formed partnerships to participate actively in the stewardship 1191gt~= ' and caretaking of Tigard's urban forest; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT 1, CRAIG DIRKSEN, Mayor of the City of 1 Tigard, Oregon, do hereby proclaim April I S, 2004 to be: ' I , off.. ARBOR DAY um>+= in Tigard and encourage people throughout the entire city to become more involved with the y planting and stewardship of the urban forest throughout the year of 2004. Dated this day of 2004. f+ ' i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Tigard to be affixed. Craig Dirksen, Mayor City of Tigard <.'•iltiii?r Attest: {"inlii~ City Recorder I 1A W-WE r Item No. 2.2 For Council Meeting of 3-,2 d"~'a III PROCLAMATION National Community Development Week, April 12 - 18, 2004 WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program has operated since ~ 197S to provide local governments with the resources required to meet the needs of persons i of low and moderate income; and WHEREAS, Community Development Block Grant funds are used by a vast number of cities, , counties and neighborhood-based nonprofit organizations throughout the Nation to address ~arlgU"ti`s g. pressing neighborhood and human service needs; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard, Oregon and other local governments have clearly demonstrated the capacity to administer and customize the CDBG program to identify and resolve pressing local problems, such as affordable housing, neighborhood and human service needs, flood: relief, Job creation and retention, and physical redevelopment; and WHEREAS, the week of April 12 - 18, 2004 has been reserved for recognition and _ appreciation of the Community Development Block Grant Program. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT 1, Mayor Craig Dirksen of the City of Tigard, auli+~ : Oregon, do hereby proclaim the week of April 1 2 -18, 2004 as COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK in Tigard, Oregon and urgg all citizens of our city to join in recognizing the Community Development Block Grant Program and the importance it serves to our community. Dated this day of . 2004. ' F I►~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set m hand and caused the Seal of the City of Tigard to be affixed. Craig Dirksen, Mayors f ` • , City of Tigard ;,y,4liin1. .'t Attest. J City Recorder s' a~~IIIIIPC€ Ry i,~ ~ ~ ~ , 14u n» ].k~.S ,tt ~ n''• 'rte.':-~y , ~ ~ t . ~ .sn l AGENDA ITEM NO. - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE : March 23, 2004 (Testimony limited to 2 minutes or less.) w The Visitor's Agenda gives citizens the opportunity to address the Tigard City Council on any topic or issue. w If you are interested in testifying on a "public hearing" item scheduled for tonight's meeting, please sign the public hearing testimony sign-up sheet for that item. NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED ~sss 6w &d16w, d S~ . D fi~ 9i tiz Ai 2m Dim . ~vhE~f/y UT 14< t t tqr S w Oe^'~ Plc l S4 . q14e5- i VISITOR'S AGENDA Page 1 Entered into the Record on 3 •a3 • of I By _-1)0- yr ~ Cro ss vac hi J-f Exhibit No. ► Dear City Council Members, Agenda Item No. My name is David Crosswhite, a resident living at 8855 Sw Edgewood St., Tigard, Oregon. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you so much for all your efforts and work to make Tigard a very livable city. I would especially like to thank you for the programs in place for sewer reimbursement districts. This is a vital need and the program you have put together is an affordable way for home owners to eliminate septic systems. My purpose for being here tonight is to suggest that the city along with th^ upcoming reimbursement district for Edgewood to also do a Capital Improvement project to put storm drains in at the same time. It seems fiscally responsible to do this at the same time to keep the cost down for providing this much needed storm drain. Currently there are some storm drain ditches along the upper portion of Edgewood that end at the bend in the road, the water runs to that point, crosses the road and collects in front of my property and at the corner of Omara and Edgewood. While I know the intent was not to promote development by getting sewer to these properties that is the inevitable result. I know myself and one or two other owners whom wish to build other homes on their property. Of course, without solving the storm drain issues that development would not happen. History for this street is that it was annexed in January of 1983 against the wishes of the home owners. Since that time I approximate that the 45 parcels have paid to the city somewhere between 1.5 and 2.3 million dollars in taxes. Now I know that money goes to pay for fire, police and to the city for projects, but it would seem that some money should have been used to improve the street surface and fix the storm drain issues. Your engineers have said the street needs to be fixed and storm drains put in. The current street was put in the 70's and paid for by the home owners at the time. I respectfully request that you consider my request. In closing just 2 owners dividing their lots to add 3 more each for a total of 6 would bring additional tax revenue to the city. I know there would be more owners divide than two. oL Thank David Crosswhite 503-319-0870 1 y N a ..Print-a-Map, SurveyNet, Washington County, OR Page 1 of 1 • J 111 - - ~ ; •l ~I - . - rte. _ I • ! _ ~'AAA • I+I SI - RL f.. 'yl lei 4 ♦ I i 1 J 41 I ! - -111 1`.1 I • Jh t -r ♦r 1 .L 1 _ Q(.. I- r www.co-washington.or.us/surveynet scale 1":829' County Surveyors Office This ma Washington County p was derived from several databases. 155 N. First Ave., Suite 350-15, The County cannot accept reponsibility for any errors, Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072 omissions, or positional accuracy and therefore there are www.co.washingion.ocus no warranties for this product. However, notification of (503) 648-8723 errors would be appreciated Printed On: 3/23/04, 1:23:26 PM Washington County, Oregon http://www.co.washington.or.us/scripts/esrin3ap.dll?name=SIRS&cmd=PrintMap&leit=7617... 3/23/04 AGENDA ITEM # Js 2 FOR AGENDA OF March 23, 2004 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE A RESOLUTION APPROVING BUDGET AMENDMENT #18 TO THE FY 2003-04 BUDGET TO INCREASE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FUNDING OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BILLING FOR THE STREET MAINTENANCE FEE PREPARED BY: Tom Imdieke DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the City Council approve Budget Amendment #18 to the FY 2003-04 Financial Operations budget for funding of the implementation of the billing for the recently approved Street Maintenance Fee? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Budget Amendment #18 to the FY 2003-04 Financial Operations budget. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Utility Billing section of Financial Operations will begin billing for the Street Maintenance Fee that the City Council established by Ordinance No. 03-10 beginning with the April, 2004 utility billing cycles. As part of the implementation, programming changes are necessary in the software that is used for creating billing statements. There is also a need to revise and print new billing statement stock that is used each time a billing is generated and mailed. Estimated total cost for both the programming and printing of new stock is $5,000. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Timely maintenance of public street infrastructure meets the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow goal of Improve Traffic Safety. The implementation and collection of the Street Maintenance Fee meets the goal of Identify and Develop Funding Resources. i i r ATTACHMENT LIST i Resolution adopting Budget Amendment #18 to the FY 2003-04 Adopted Budget. 1 FISCAL NOTES Estimated cost of implementation is $5,000. This action would transfer $5,000 from the Central Services Fund Contingency to Financial Operations. In FY 2004-05 Adopted Budget, a transfer of resources in this same amount would be made from the Street Maintenance Fee Fund to reimburse the Central Services Fund. AGENDA ITEM # 5.3 FOR AGENDA OF March 23, 2004 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Appoint initial members to the Planned Development Code Review Committee PREPARED BY: Susan Koepping 6y- 1 DEPT HEAD OK M Ufh`n CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Appointments to the Planned Development Code Review Committee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution making the following appointments to the Planned Development Code Review Committee: Tigard residents Alice Ellis Gaut, Ron Ellis Gaut, John Frewing, Charles Schwarz and David Walsh. Susan Beilke would be appointed to represent the environmental perspective, and Bill McMonagle to represent the engineering/building perspective. Planning Commission members Gretchen Buchner and Scot Sutton would be appointed as recommended by the Planning Commission to represent the Commission on this committee. INFORMATION SUMMARY On January 27, 2004 the City Council established a Planned Development Code Review Committee by Resolution 04-08. This committee will review and possibly recommend to Council changes to the Planned Development Section of the Community Development Code, Section 18.350. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Do not create this committee at this time. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Goal: City will maximize the effectiveness of the volunteer spirit to accomplish the greatest good for our community. ATTACHMENT LIST Resolution Biographical information on the candidates FISCAL NOTES There is no cost associated with this action. Biographical information on the Planned Development Code Committee members March 23, 2004 Alice Ellis Gaut resides in the southern end of Tigard. She has lived in Tigard for eight years, and is an active member of several community organizations. She graduated from New York University as well as Lewis and Clark University. Alice is an attorney and currently does pro bono work. Ron Ellis Gaut resides in the southern end of Tigard, and has lived in Tigard for fifteen years. He is founder and manager of a software consulting firm, and completed his college work in Oregon. Ron, too, is active in local community organizations. John Frewing has lived in Tigard for five years, currently in the northeast part of town. He previously lived in Portland. John holds degrees from Harvard and the University of Washington, and was a manager for PGE before his retirement. John actively contributes to his community in a variety of organizations. Charles Schwarz and his family have lived in Tigard for five years, and reside not far from the new library site. He holds degrees from the University of Illinois and Western Washington University. Charles is employed by the State of Oregon, and has volunteered in youth sports activities. David Walsh, a relatively new resident of Tigard and Oregon, resides near Cook Park. He holds degrees from the University of Tennessee and the University of Maine. David served on various municipal boards and committees where he lived previously. Susan Beilke lives not far from Fowler Middle School. A thirteen year resident of Tigard, Sue holds a degree in Biology from Portland State with additional advanced coursework. She has worked as a wildlife biologist since 1985, and is currently employed by the State of Oregon in that field. She actively volunteers with a variety of organizations doing environmental restoration and planting, and leading efforts to survey plant and animal species in Tigard. Sue will represent the environmental perspective on this committee. Bill McMonagle grew up in Lake Oswego and attended universities in California and Oregon. He is a partner in a local engineering, land planning, surveying and construction management company. In addition to owning and operating this company for 38 years, he has been active on a variety of public boards and committees. Bill will represent the engineeringibuilding perspectives on this committee. AGENDA ITEM FOR AGENDA OF March 23, 2004 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Right-of, -ay dedication for SW 68,0'.,Pnarkway PREPARED BY: G. Ben ~48 DEPT HEAD OK Cj CTTY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall City Council dedicate City-owned land for SW 68`' Parkway right-of-way? STAFF RECOMMENDATION That City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign the attached Dedication Deed. INFORMATION SUMMARY During 1987, SW 680' Parkway was improved through Local Improvement District No. 35. During the period 1985 through 1987, the land required for the improvements was conveyed to the City by four deeds recorded at 85043571, 85043572, 86002741, and 87061373. The land conveyed was not subsequently dedicated as public right-of-way. As a result of conveyances to the City, the street improvements have occupied City-owned land since the improvements were constructed in 1987. The attached proposed dedication deed conveys title from the City to the public to create right-of-way for those street improvements. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Not applicable VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Not applicable ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment 1: Proposed Resolution Exhibit 1: Dedication deed Exhibit A: Legal description and map FISCAL NOTES Not applicable AGENDA ITEM # J`. J Ct FOR AGENDA OF March 23, 2004 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR AN AUTOMATED INSPECTION REQUEST SYSTEM. PREPARED BY: Joe Barrett DEPT HEAD OK /4A CITY MGR OK kAlyn-- ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the Local Contract Review Board authorize the purchase of an automated inspection request system? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Award the contract to the best Proposer based upon responses received from formal Request for Proposal process that was utilized. INFORMATION SUMMARY Over the past few years, the City's Building Department has investigated the benefits of implementing an automated system for handling the City's inspection requests. In their investigations, staff has found that an automated system would improve efficiency and customer service for customers requesting inspections and inquiring about inspection results. City customers would also be able to schedule and/or cancel inspections and the inspection results could be posted the same day the inspection is requested via touch-tone phone. All these efficiencies would be highly beneficial to the department's inspectors, allowing for more inspections to be completed through the reduction of time spent retrieving phone messages and returning customer phone calls. Based on these findings, staff conducted a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) for an automated system in February of this year. The City received two responses to the RFP. After a detailed review of the proposals, staff has determined Selectron Technologies, Inc. to be the best and most responsive Proposer and recommends the City award a contract to the firm for the implementation of an automated inspection request system OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Do not award a contract thereby directing staff to conduct a revised Request for Proposal process VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A ATTACHMENT LIST None. FISCAL NOTES The estimated cost of the automated system software from Selectron is $38,900. In addition, the City will need to purchase a Tidemark Advantage IVR API attachment for $18,900 and a printer for inspection forms at $10,400 to complete the system. The Building Department currently has $70,000 available for the project. AGENDA ITEM # S b. FOR AGENDA OF March 23, 2004 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award of Contract for the Construction of FY 2003-04 Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation Program X11 ~ PREPARED BY:Vannie Nguyen •DEPT HEAD OK: Agustin P. Duenas CITY MGR OK: BV 1 Won an ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the Local Contract Review Board approve the contract award for the construction of FY 2003-04 Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation Program? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council, by motion, approve the contract award to Planned and Engineered Construction, Inc. in the amount of $62,830.00. INFORMATION SUMMARY In 2001, the City ofTigard's television inspection reports identified more than 6,000 feet of sanitary and storm drainpipes that are seriously damaged. The line segments have numerous cracks and the pipe joints are widely split allowing water to leak through. To restore the structural integrity of the damaged pipes, staff proposes a yearly rehabilitation program that would provide corrective and preventative maintenance to approximately 1,000 feet of pipe per year. The rehabilitation program would use a method to install pipe that eliminates the need to excavate. The installation of Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP) utilizes a trenchless construction method that prevents damage to existing pavement and minimizes disruption to traffic and underground utilities. This method is widely used by other governmental agencies and has proved effective in solving the problem. The installation of CIPP is formed by the insertion of a resin-impregnated flexible felt tube into an existing pipe. The tube is expanded with water in an inversion process to fit against the host pipe, and then heated to cure the resin. The finished product is a jointless, structural pipe that is formed to the existing host pipe. So far, the proposed program has rehabilitated 1,522 feet of CIPP located at various locations in the City. This year's program includes 1,596 feet of pipes on the following streets: Ashbury Lane, Swendon Loop, Feiring Lane, 133`a Avenue and Ventura Court. The bid opening for the project was conducted on March 9, 2004. The bid results are: Gelco Services Salem, OR $102,892.00 Instituform Technologies, Inc. Chesterfield, MO $ 98,890.00 Planned & Engineered Const Inc. Helena MT $ 62,830.00 Engineer's Estimate $ 98,000.00 OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY None ATTACHMENT LIST Project Location Map FISCAL NOTES The proposed project is funded in the amount of $100,000 in the FY 2003-04 CIP Storm Sewer Fund. This amount is sufficient to award the contract of $63,840.00 to Planned and Engineered Construction, Inc. I. WU=03-2m ry dP% wm Oren mrd"umn vovwn%=n 2101 pa Wwb cwtwl ~4 r tdoe r rrVYVV s • FY 2003-04 STORM DRAIN PIPE REHABILITATION PROGRAM ALFR£ ~I 1, ' ~~w~ B£NISH ST 1 Iii N/,Ay -L 69S~j ( 1 I I Z BOUN£FF Sr D t1111W \ 1 lUW 4OR {emu 9 1 ~1~OQOR} BRITTANY DR. SNBURY LN ~FEIRING LN Val - MORNING 01" VICINITY MAP NTS AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF March 23, 2004 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE A resolution acknowledging, the leadership and dedicated community service rendered by Joseph Grisham Police Lieutenant for the City of Tigard from March 16, 1977 to March 31, 2004. PREPARED BY: Chief Bill Dickinson DEPT HEAD OK f 6n!j CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL The issue before the Council is to approve a resolution recognizing the dedicated services rendered by Lt. Joseph Grisham to the City of Tigard from March 16, 1977 to March 31, 2004. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the resolution. INFORMATION SUMMARY The resolution is requested to honor Lt. Joseph Grisham as he retires from the Police Department after 27 years of dedicated service to this community. Lt. Grisham was hired as a police officer on March 16, 1977. He was promoted to Sergeant on August 9, 1990, and to Lieutenant April 15, 1996. Serving as Lieutenant, he managed the Detective Unit for six years; and following that, he managed one of the Patrol Unit shifts. He established high standards for his units, instructed and developed the officers under him, and maintained his own high level of expertise. His contacts with the District Attorney, Sheriffs Office investigators, and other agencies greatly aided in Tigard's ability to solve crimes and deal with drug and gang activity. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED No other alternatives considered. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY No specific goals or strategies are addressed by this resolution. i ATTACHMENT LIST i Attachment 1 - Resolution. FISCAL NOTES There is no cost for approving this resolution. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: The Honorable Mayor and Council City Attorney Ramis, FROM: Greer Gaston DATE: March 16, 2004 SUBJECT: Preliminary Engineer's Report on the Wall Street Local Improvement District A hard copy of the Preliminary Engineer's Report on the Wall Street Local Improvement District is attached. This report is also available electronically in your e-packet. This will be an agenda item at the March 23, 2004 meeting. I:%ADM\GREERSCORRESPONDWIEMOS%CC WALL ST LIDMOC AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF March 23.2004 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Preliminary Engineer's Report for the Proposed Wall Street Local Improvement District .tip PREPARED BY: A.P. Du~ DEPT HEAD OK~ CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Presentation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report prepared for the Proposed Local Improvement District as directed by Council Resolution No. 02-11. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council provide direction regarding the proposed LID in accordance with the recommendations in the Preliminary Engineer's Report. INFORMATION SUMMARY One new alternate route identified in Tigard's Transportation System Plan (TSP) is the extension of Wall Street from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard. This connection is projected to carry about 5,000 to 7,000 vehicles per day and relieves Hall Boulevard sufficiently to allow that street to function adequately at 3 instead of 5 lanes. This proposed street would allow northbound traffic from south Tigard to bypass Hall Boulevard and proceed directly to Hunziker Street, then north to the Tigard Triangle. The intention in the TSP is that this new route would be constructed in conjunction with development of the propertieaadjacent to the new street. The interest shown by a major property owner along the proposed corridor for the Wall Street Extension initiated LID formation process to construct the new street. Council Resolution No. 02-11 directed the Engineering staff to prepare a Preliminary Engineer's Report for the Proposed Wall Street Local Improvement District (LID). To fully explore all the aspects of the proposed LID, the Preliminary Engineer's Report preparation required that the design plans be approximately 60% complete. The City retained the engineering consulting firm of DeHaas & Associates to prepare the Preliminary Engineer's Report. Because of the major issues involved, an interim report at 35% design was included to provide City Council a progress report on the work to date. That interim report was presented to City Council at its meeting of March 11, 2003. The Council direction at that meeting was to proceed with the completion of the Preliminary Engineer's report. The completed report addresses key issues including crossing of the railroad tracks, crossing of Fanno Creek, and removal of an existing spur track. The completed report makes recommendations regarding the proposed LID for Council consideration and action. City staff and the design consultant will present a summary of the Preliminary Engineer's Report and recommendations and will be prepared to answer questions regarding the issues, the proposed LID boundary, the proposed improvements, and estimated costs. t> a ~ =Mani Because of the requirement from the Oregon Department of Transportation to limit access to Hall Boulevard, a segment of Wall Street needs to be constructed to provide joint access to the new Library and Fanno Pointe Condominiums, whether or not the LID is formed to construct the proposed improvements. By Resolution No. 03-16, City Council separated the Hall Boulevard/Wall Street intersection approaches from the proposed LID study so that it could be designed and constructed as a City project to allow for that common access point. Should the LID be formed to construct Wall Street in its entire length, the costs incurred for the Wall Street/Hall Boulevard intersection and approaches would be incorporated into the overall LID. However, if the LID is not formed to continue Wall Street beyond the joint access location, the costs would be absorbed by the City as a City-funded project. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY The improvements proposed by this LID meets the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow goal of Improve Traffic Flow by creating an alternative route that bypasses the Hall/Hunziker/Scoff ns signals and allows traffic to move directly to Hunziker Street from Hall Boulevard south of City Hall. ATTACHMENT LIST Preliminary Engineer's Report - Wall Street LID Resolution No. 02-11 Resolution No. 03-16 FISCAL NOTES The FY 2003-04 Capital Improvement Program provides $150,000 for the Wall Street LID and $1,286,466 for the Hall Blvd/Wall Street Intersection and Approaches. The funding available is sufficient for the preparation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report. "r MangVw%cawx:U agenda sunYnades%nenda summary - peBMnar/ en(ilnee s report for pmDosed wad sneer bd-doc a: i r i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 02- 11 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ENGINEERING STAFF TO PREPARE A PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED WALL STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND DIRECTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FUNDING MECHANISM FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE REPORT. WHEREAS, one of two new key alternate routes identified in Tigard's Transportation System Plan (TSP) is the extension of Wall Street from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard; and WHEREAS, this new route is projected to carry up to 7,000 vehicles per day and relieve Hall Boulevard sufficiently to allow that street to function adequately at 3 instead of 5lanes; and WHEREAS, one major property owner along the proposed corridor for the road project is interested in forming a Local Improvement District (LID) for construction of the new connector road; and WHEREAS, an Option Agreement executed to purchase property from this land owner for the proposed new Tigard Library requires the City to pursue formation of an LID for construction of the street; and WHEREAS, the City agreed in that Option Agreement to provide the funding for the engineering and construction management of the LID improvements; and WHEREAS, the Engineering staff prepared a Preliminary Evaluation Report which was submitted to City Council for discussion and direction during the meeting on January 22, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Evaluation Report determined that the proposed LID appears feasible, despite various major issues that need resolution, and recommended that City Council take the next step in the LID formation process by authorizing the preparation of a Preliminary Engineer's Report; and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Evaluation Report recognized that there is no funding currently available to move ahead with the project and recommended that City Council direct the establishment of that funding mechanism designating the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Fund as the funding source; and WHEREAS, City Council discussed the proposed LID and indicated that the LID boundary and improvements to be constructed by the LID are satisfactory as submitted; and i WHEREAS, City Council has directed staff to prepare a resolution authorizing preparation of a Preliminary Engineer's Report and submit that resolution for adoption at the next Council business meeting. RESOLUTION NO.02- ~l Page I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Engineering staff is directed to proceed with preparation of Preliminary Engineer's Report for the proposed LID in accordance with the proposed LID boundary and improvements as described in the Preliminary Evaluation Report. SECTION 2: The Preliminary Engineer's Report should include the scope of work, location of the pmposed improvements, proposed district boundaries, estimated costs, proposed assessment methods, and other information that may be relevant to the feasibility of the improvements and district. The report should recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial. SECTION 3: The City of Tigard shall provide the funding for preparation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report. The initial amount needed to prepare the report and continue with the LIDformation process is approximately $325,000. SECTION 4: The City staff is directed to establish the funding mechanism in that amount for the engineering work using the TIF as a funding source. Any budget adjustments requiring Council action and necessary for the establishment of the project funding shall be brought to Council for appropriate action. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Resolution shall be effective immediately. ->r PASSED: This day of , 2002. yor - City o Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder - City of Tigard lACitywide\Res\Resolution Directing Preliminary Engineer's Report for Wall Strad LID RESOLUTION NO. o2--LL Page 2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO.03-)(P A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE FY 2002-03 CIP (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAW BUDGET. WHEREAS, the Adopted FY 2002-03 CIP (Capital Improvement Program) of the City of Tigard lists all projects authorized to be developed or constructed in FY 2002-03; and WHEREAS, the FY 2002-03 CIP includes a project under the Street System Program funded under the Gas Tax Fund to reconstruct North Dakota Street (Greenburg Road to 95`s Avenue); and WHEREAS, visual inspection, confirmed by geotechnical investigation, of the street structural section un Bunita Road from Hall Boulevard to Fanno Creek Bridge indicates that reconstruction of that street is urgently needed at this time; and WHEREAS, Botuta Road is a collector street in the City's transportation network and carries significantly more traffic than North Dakota Street (a neighborhood route); and WHEREAS, the proposed improvements on North Dakota Street can be delayed and the amount of funding allocated to that project can be applied to the Bonita Road Reconstruction Project for the remainder of FY 2002-03 without increasing the CIP Budget: and WHEREAS, the FY 2002-03 CIP includes the proposed Wall Street LID (Local Improvement District) Project with funding of $300,000 allocated for the design of the project; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of both the City and the Oregon Department of Transportation that the new Tigard Library projcct and the Fmino Pointe Condominiums prujnct have one common access point to Hall Boulevard along the selected Wall Street alignment; and WHEREAS, there is a need to separate the Hall Boulevard/Wall Street intersection and approaches from the proposed LID so that it could be designed and constructed as a City project to allow for that common access point; and L. WHEREAS, the extension of Wall Street from that segment to connect to Hunziker Street r would remain under the proposed Wall Street LID project and would be constructed only if the 0 LID is successfully formed and permits are obtained to cross the wetlands, Fanno Creek, and the existing railroad tracks; and a WHEREAS, the $300,000 available in TIF funds for engineering design costs under the Wall Street LID Fund could be reallocated to provide $200,000 for the intersection project and J $100,000 for the Wall Street LID without changing the overall FY 2002-03 CIP Budget amount; and RESOLUTION NO.03- f Page 1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its meeting on April 21, 2003 approved the proposed amendments and recommends approval to the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION I- Amendment No. 1 to the FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program Budget is hereby approved to add the Bonita Road Reconstruction Project (Hall Boulevard to Fanno Creek Bridge) to the Street System Program project list and delete the North Dakota Street Project (Greenburg Road to 95L' Avenue) from that list. The amount of $120,000 allocated in the FY 2002-03 CIP Budget from the Gas Tax Fund for the North Dakota Street Project is hereby allocated for the Bonita Road Reconstruction Project. SECTION 2: Amendment No. 2 to the Approved FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program Budget is hereby approved to establish the Hall Boulevard/Wall Street Intersection and Approaches project as a project separate from the Wall Street LID. The $300,000 allocated from TIF funds for the Wall Street LID project is hereby reallocated as follows: Hall Boulevard/Wall Street Intersection and Approaches ($200,000) and the Wall Street LID ($100,000). SECTION 3: There shall be no changes in the overall FY 2002-03 CIP Budget amount as a result of these amendments. EFFECTIVE DATE: This resolution shall take effect on May 13, 2003. PASSED: This 3 - day of 2003. (J Tor~ City f aril ATTEST: i 's I City Recorder - City of Tig I.T-ngXGusiResohitionslResolution Amending the FY 2002-03 CIP Budget.doc RESOLUTION NO.03- Page 2 City of Tigard Preliminary Engineer's Report Proposed Wall Street Local Improvement District March 23, 2004 The Wall Street Extension *Connects Hunziker Street with Hall Boulevard ® Key route in new Transportation System Plan .0 Projected to carry up to 7,000 vehicles per day *Proposed for construction with development 1 'Reasons for the LID • Transportation Benefits ► Provides an alternate route to the Tigard Triangle ► Relieves congestion at the Hall/Hunziker and 72nd/Bonita intersections x ► Would delay widening of Hall Blvd and 72°d Avenue for 15-20 years ► Provides joint access for the new Tigard Library and Fanno Pointe 3 Reasons for the LID • Economic Benefits ► Would open up approximately 69 acres of industrial land for development (approximately 15% of total industrial land in Tigard) ► New jobs will be created ► Increased tax revenue for the City a 2 T Reasons for the LID • Major property owner owns over 70% of benefited properties • Major property owner in support of the LID • Provides City a rare opportunity to accelerate construction of this key connector road 5 LID Process *Preliminary Evaluation Report ® Preliminary Engineer's Report ® Declaration of intention to form the district ® District formation ® Construction of Improvements u, ® Spreading of assessments by ordinance ~j r ~ G 3 Actions to Date *Council Resolution No. 02-11 directed the preparation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report *Interim Report was presented to Council on March 11, 2003 *The Preliminary Engineer's Report brings the design work to approximately 60% complete r Issues * At-grade crossing of two main railroad tracks *Permits for crossing of Fanno Creek, flood plain and wetlands 4 *Comprehensive Plan Amendment ® Removal of spur track adjacent { s: to existing access road C. ► Rarely used since placement 4 Issues M. i 11 1 f 1 3 v Hall Blvd/Wall Street Project , r • Separated from the Wall Street LID • Phase 1 established as a City project ► Will provide joint access for the new Library and Fanno Pointe Condominiums ► Is planned to proceed to construction regardless of the LID formation ® Phase 2 (construction of the rest of Wall Street) depends on LID formation 10 s Street Alignments iing 1!~j s I a fill i Selected Alignment EXHIBIT 8 wswv¢s ~ aos,c +r..o.v j r!., 6 Mile i- Selected Alignment • ~ 34rN 2 a Overview of Phases 14 .0 7 Proposed Boundary r CXHIBIT C A+ .vs.n IS At-Grade Railroad Crossings 0 :7 WEN - _ Y t G• ~ ~ ju-: PROP EXTE\51.^,N _ ~D IICQ~=~/~ j~•„~,,,, _ WALL SrRHT s - - - _ ~i•~ L~~~L~__ dl![r~ FP C OC N, wP~. - 16 8 Proposed Bridge ~ 9~ ~s ,^,Igaec ~ Y 17 Y D ' Estimated Costs • Project Improvements $3.85 million • Land Acquisition $0.88 million • Interim Financing Costs $0.20 million • Miscellaneous $0.87 million Total LID Costs $5.796 million Y 4 IR 9 K Current Status • Application for at-grade crossing has been submitted ► Portland-Western Railroad objects ► Hearing has been requested • Applications for environmental permits have been submitted • Comprehensive Plan Amendment has been submitted iv Recommendations 0 Delay a decision until the hearing f. on the crossing is completed *After a decision has been rendered ► Staff will report to Council on the results ► Council may consider other E` options, or decide at that time to terminate the LID proceedings p4 F 1 20 10 ~ s i. •ae ~ ,/,CIF ~4. tic a r'••. ' '-Y. .i,. , 7 \XPRR 40 t / Ilk - , fem. .,.':t ,•r' 14 tit ,a } 4. ~c L)4t sA. 2i - '~y'~~ , 11~ ~+a~~3~ •`yM1~Y.~ T.. S~y P.•. M44 y~. i . ~ ~ „r` Y--TT~~-TTT.....~~777 t~~T..l •y" ~ `i ~ •'fR. y ~ b ,•C'~ •~te IFF y. . - - .'istx ' • i ~OtJ ar { > . f ,.r • t mr"~ • ` 4r IF ' ~ 1 ~ J 1 ~~`S` ,.~'~,\~,..Aisfersy~• '•_ti`~,. J.1 Y ; i Y-?'~~ .F_; a r-~t~7~ \ ~t ,~.}y"~{ 14 'i v. ' ~ ~ 1,~. S~j~ x~, a "P : ° f Y•? 1~Rw~ ~4--• .~-4 t "p~{~ M 1~ q•Y. - •7♦,y. f.•yI'•! ~ J- ~3=Lt i `i. +T 4. t ~ • T ^{~'F tea, 1 CITY OF TIGARD 1 1 1 PRELIMINARY 1 ENGINEERS REPORT 1 1 - WALL STREET 1 LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 1 PROJECT NO. 0455 TIGARD, OREGON 1 MARCH, 2004 1 1 Exp. 12131105 p PROF s/ 1 DeHaas & Associates, Inc. ~`5 ENS" oy Suite 300 - AGC Center a'ta 9450 SW Commerce Circle Wilsonville, OR 97070 (503) 682-2450 ~4<Y 14's6 l (503) 682-4018 Fax q'4C/N J. i SNP 02.629.118 Table of Contents I. NARRATIVE A. Background B. Proposed Improvements e 1. Street Improvements 2. Storm Drain Improvements 3. Water Improvements 4. Signing, Striping and Illumination Improvements 5. Underground Utility Improvements 6. Landscape Improvements 7. Buffer Mitigation and Stream Restoration Improvements ' 8. Signalization Improvements 9. Sanitary Sewer Improvements 10. Railroad Crossing Improvements 11. Fanno Creek Bridge Improvements C. Right-of-Way Acquisition D. Railroad Spur Track Elimination E. Summary of Project Costs F. LID Boundary G. Recommended Assessment Methods H. Preliminary Assessments 1. Important and Significant Issues J. Neighborhood Meetings K. Status, Summary and Recommendations II. EXHIBITS (SEE TABS A - .n A. Wall Street Alignment Alternatives B. General Street Alignment, Typical Sections, Bridge, Lighting, Underground Utilities and Railroad Crossing C. Storm Drain, Sanitary Sewer, Water and Water Quality D. Railroad-Highway Crossing Safety Application E. Fanno Creek (Wall Street) Bridge F. LID Boundary, Assessable Areas, Right-of-Way Acquisition Areas and total Assessments G. Estimated Right-of-Way Costs H. Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates 1. Proposed Assessments J. Preliminary Assessment Roll II. ATTACHMENTS (SEE TABS 1 - 14) 1. DKS Traffic Circulation Report 2. Preliminary Evaluation Report - Wall Street LID 3. Council Resolution 02-11 4. Council Minutes - March 11, 2003 5. Excerpt Illustrations Related to Environmental Challenges 6. January 15, 2004 ODOT Letter 7. Portland & Western RR February 3, 2004 Objection Letter to Railroad Crossing and Prior City/RR Correspondence 7a. 11/26/01 Duenas to Portland & Western Railroad, Inc. (Phillips) 7b. 1/21/02 Portland & Western Railroad, Inc. (Phillips) to Duenas 7c. 9/19/02 Minutes Railroad Coordination Meeting 7d. 9/26/02 ODOT Rail (Reiley) to Duenas 8. ODOT February 6, 2004 Letter to City with Procedural Instructions 9. City February 27, 2004 Letter to ODOT Requesting Hearing 10. Railroad Spur Track Removal Correspondence I Oa. Klokke Corporation 7/23/01 Duenas to Rivers I Ob. Klokke Corporation 9/07/01 Duenas to Rivers I Oc. Klokke Corporation 9/27/01 Ferguson to Duenas IOd. Klokke Corporation 1/17/03 DeHaas to Deering Management 10e. HGM Group, LLC 1/17/03 DeHaas to Bennett IOf. HGM Group, LLC 1/22/03 Bennett to DeHaas 1 l Og. Klokke Corporation 2/26/03 Rivers to DeHaas I Oh. Limited-Scope Property Appraisal Consulting Report 11. Fanno Creek (Wall Street) Bridge Report 12. Neighborhood Meeting Agenda and Minutes 13. ODOT State Highway Approach Permit (Wall Street to Hall Blvd.) 14. Shannon & Wilson Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation e a I 1 ~ R~TIVE ~ NA 0 i NARRATIVE (3/1/04) A. BACKGROUND The extension of Wall Street from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard is one of the two key alternative routes identified in Tigard's recently adopted Transportation System Plan ' (TSP). This proposed new route is projected to carry up to 7,000 vehicles per day and would reduce the level of traffic at two key intersections (Hall Blvd./Hunziker Street and 72nd Avenue/Bonita Road). This Wall Street improvement would allow northbound traffic from South Tigard to bypass Hall Boulevard and proceed directly to Hunziker Street, then North to the Tigard Triangle. A proposed future overcrossing of Highway 217 would allow traffic to connect directly from Hunziker to Hampton Street in the ' Tigard Triangle. DKS prepared a September 6, 2000 memorandum addressing Linkages between Hall, Hunziker and Dartmouth (See Attachment 1). A Preliminary Evaluation Report (Attachment 2) was prepared for the 1/22/02 Council agenda. By resolution No. 02-11 (Attachment 3), City Council directed the preparation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report, as the next step in the process to determine if the Local Improvement District (LID) should be formed. In September of 2002 the City retained DeHaas & Associates, Inc., a consulting engineering firm, to prepare a Conceptual Engineer's Report related to formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) for constructing the Wall Street Project, and addressing Sensitive Land Areas; Topographic Survey; Roadway Alignment; Bridge ' Design; Right-of-Way; Permits; Geotechnical Exploration and Report; Storm Drainage; Sanitary Sewers; Water; Utilities (Power, Telephone, Gas, T.V.); Signing and Striping; Landscaping, Coordination with Other Agencies; Neighborhood Contact; Cost Estimate; and Specifications, all culminating in a Conceptual Engineer's Report. The Conceptual Engineer's Report was presented to Council March 11, 2003. Although not advertised as a public hearing the Council took testimony from all that wished to speak. Minutes related to the LID issue are attached (See Attachment 4). After deliberation, Council directed staff to continue the LID process by completing the Preliminary Engineer's Report before making a final decision on formation of the LID. The following Subconsultants were retained by DeHaas & Associates, Inc. to address special elements in developing the Conceptual Engineer's Report and this Preliminary Engineer's Report. OBEC Consulting Engineers Bridge Design and Hydraulic Investigation Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. (PHS) Sensitive Lands Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (KAI) Traffic Engineering (Signals, Signing, Striping and Lighting) 1 Ell 11 Shannon and Wilson, Inc. Geotechnical Investigations and Reports David Evans & Associates (DEA) Railroad Crossing Application Greenworks, P.C. Landscaping Kurahashi & Associates, Inc. Water Quality Fishman Environmental Services Environmental Assessment, Wetland Mitigation, Biological Assessment and Environmental Permitting A condition of ODOT's approval of the recent Hall Blvd. Improvements fronting the new Library and Fanno Pointe developments, requires that the Library and Fanno Pointe developments must take access off Wall Street at a point approximately 400ft. from Hall Blvd., and their temporary accesses off Hall Blvd. be closed. In an effort to have the portion of Wall Street serving the new Library complete by the time the Library opened, and because issues of LID formation, railroad crossing approvals, spur track removal, etc. will consume considerable time, the City Council directed staff to proceed with design and construction of the first 425ft of Wall Street. B. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 1. Street Improvements. Proposed street improvements are approximately 3,200 feet long, beginning at a signalized connection to Hall Blvd. midway between Omara ' Street and Regina Lane and extending easterly across Fanno Creek, across two sets of railroad tracks and along the current Coe Manufacturing Co/Fred Fields access strips (Wall Street) to intersect with Hunziker Street. Four alternative alignments were considered and evaluated during the Conceptual Engineer's Report phase. While preparing this Preliminary Engineer's Report, an extensive Alternatives Analysis was conducted related to Division of State Lands and Corps of Engineers permitting. That Alternatives Analysis produced evaluation of five more alternatives, culminating in the selection of Alternative 9, which is believed to be the best alternative available, satisfying the principal issues of improving the street network, addressing ODOT requirements for access spacing on Hall Blvd. and a host of complex environmental issues. The alternatives studied, including recommended Alternative 9 are illustrated in Exhibit A. The basic typical section includes a 48ft. width between curbs (2-12ft. travel lanes, a 12ft. left-turn median and 2-6ft. bicycle lanes). The total R/W width will . be 70ft. Sidewalks will be 6ft. wide located at the R/W line and the remaining area between the curb and sidewalk will have street trees and landscaping. At the bridge and the railroad crossing the curb-to-curb width will be reduced to 36ft., 2 7~ eliminating the 12ft. left turn refuge and landscaped area. Lighting and underground utilities (Power, Telephone, Gas, T.V.) will be incorporated into the street improvements. See typical sections Exhibit B. 2. Storm Drain Improvements. (Excepting Buffer Mitigation and Stream Restoration). Contribution from West of Hall Blvd. South of Wall Street and the portion of Wall Street between Hall Blvd. and Fanno Creek will be piped to a joint water quality facility North of Wall Street (which facility serves both Wall Street and the new Library site) with effluent to the easterly pond area, which is spanned by the westerly end of the bridge. See Exhibit C. Contribution from the portion of Wall Street between Fanno Creek and the railroad will be piped to a water quality facility with effluent into wetlands spanned by the easterly end of the bridge. See Exhibit C. Contribution from the proposed section of Wall Street (between the railroad and Hunziker) will be piped westerly along that section of Wall Street, through a bore under the railroad, then further westerly in the new Wall Street R/W and eventually to the water quality facility with effluent into wetlands spanned by the easterly end of the bridge. See Exhibit C. 3. Water Improvements. A new 12-inch water main will be constructed the length of Wall Street providing a loop connection with existing watermains in I lall Blvd. and Hunziker Street. A bore will be required under the railroad tracks. See Exhibit C. 0 4. Signing, Striping and Illumination Improvements. Signing, striping and illumination improvements will be constructed in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and City of Tigard lighting specifications. Signing will include advance signing related to the railroad crossings. See Exhibit B. 5. Underground Utility Improvements. All utilities will be placed underground. Underground utilities will be gas (NWNG), power (PGE), lighting (PGE), telephone (Verizon), and T.V. (Comcast). No fibre optic cable will be included in this project. See Exhibit B. 6. Landscaping and Irrigation Improvements. (Excepting Buffer Mitigation and Stream Restoration). The area between the sidewalk and curb will be landscaped with street trees and appropriate ground cover. Any disturbed areas will be seeded. 7. Buffer Mitigation and Stream Restoration Improvements. From the testimony at 3 the March 11, 2003 Council meeting and on-going liaison with principal permitting agencies such as Division of State Lands (DSL), Corps of Engineers (COE), Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of Fish & Wildlife (ODF&W), etc. it became evident that a very thorough effort would be required in order to successfully comply with City of Tigard, Clean Water Services, State and Federal regulatory requirements. In addition there would be the need to answer questions of environmental and other public groups related to impacts to wetlands, water quality, wildlife species and habitat, and Endangered Species Act-listed fish in the Fanno Creek system. Fishman Environmental Services was retained to address these issues and to complete the permitting process. The Joint Permit DSL/COE Application has been submitted. The text and many ' exhibits are too voluminous to attach to this report. Contents of the application include: ' The application form executed by the City and Fishman Environmental Services. Supplemental Wetland Impact Information. Proposed Project Purpose and Description. ' Alternatives Analysis. Adjoining Property Owners and Interested Parties. Physical and Biological Character of the Wetland/Waterway site. ' Compensatory Mitigation Plan. Biological Assessment. Site Photographs. Wetland Mitigation Plan. Appendix A through D. Along with 158 pages of text, the application contains 72 exhibits consisting of plans, figures, pictures and tables generated by DeHaas and Fishman to illustrate the submittal. Several photos and plan excerpts are attached to illustrate the flavor of the effort involved in the Pinebrook Buffer Mitigation and Stream Restoration. See Attachment 5. i 8. Signalization Improvements. New signalization will be constructed at the Hall i Blvd./Wall Street intersection along with interconnect facilities with other signalization on Hall Blvd. as directed by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Signal design will be baser' on ODOT Standards, the signal layout being based upon ODOT recommended signal phasing. An interconnect system will be constructed tying this signal to the HallBurham and Hall/McDonald signalized intersections located adjacent to this intersection. 4 71 Sufficient conduit was placed in the Hall Blvd./Wall Street intersection during the widening of Hall Blvd. to support this future signalization and avoid having to trench into the new Hall Blvd. pavement. 9. Sanitary Sewer Improvements. Trunk sanitary sewers have previously been constructed sufficient to provide service to all the large parce!s included in the LID boundary, except Properties No. 5 (Tax Lot 1100) and No. 6 (Tax Lot 800). A 10-inch sanitary sewer will be extended from an existing manhole at the southwesterly line of Property No. 8, extending southeasterly approximately 680ft. to serve Properties No. 5 and No. 6 on the southeasterly side of Wall Street. It is assumed that Property No. 10 will eventually be combined with another tract that has available sanitary sewer service. See Exhibit C. e 10. Railroad Crossing Improvements. An at-grade crossing is required over two sets of tracks approximately 90ft. apart. The westerly Oregon Electric track is owned by ODOT. Portland & Western Railroad (PNWR) has an exclusive easement to operate this ODOT track. The easterly track is owned by Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). PNWR has an operating lease to operate on this easterly track. PNWR runs eight (8) trains per day in this section of track which could grow to 10 times per day in the future. In addition, this section of track is used for switching, storage and transfer. Future operations will change with addition of the proposed Washington County Commuter Rail project. The Commuter Rail project would add 30 to 50 trains per day at speeds of 60 to 70 miles per hour. Projections are for the commuter rail operation to begin in Fall of 2005. A preliminary application (Railroad-Highway Crossing Safety Application) for the new crossing was submitted to ODOT Rail for review and comments. There were a number of minor revisions required. The one major revision was the requirement that there be a set of signals for each track resulting in two sets of signals versus a single set proposed in the initial Conceptual Engineer's Report. This increases the cost of the railroad crossing signalization by approximately one-third. i The City has submitted the appropriate revised Railroad-Highway Crossing Safety Application to the Rail Division of ODOT (See Exhibit D). On January 15, 2004 ODOT Rail made formal distribution of the City's application to interested parties (See Attachment 6). By letter of February 3, 2004, Portland & Western Railroad formally objected to the railroad crossing application (See Attachment 7). By letter of February 6, 2004 ODOT Rail advised City that as follows: 5 If the City desires to continue pursuing the proposed at-grade crossing, provide a written request that ODOT Rail Division set this matter for hearing. (See Attachment 8). Other options for the City were to withdraw its application or amend its application from an at-grade crossing to a separated grade crossing. On February 27, 2004 the City provided a written request that ODOT Rail Division set the matter for public hearing. See Attachment 9. 11. Fanno Creek Bridge Improvements. A bridge approximately 320ft. in length is the minimum required to meet FEMA guidelines (no-rise in the regulated floodwa , but still falls short of City Comprehensive Plan requirements that there be (no-rise in the 100yr. base flood event). At the bridge location, the required floodway is 320ft. The 100yr. base flood is approximately 500ft. wide. O Accordingly, construction of the 320ft. bridge will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The City has opted not to pursue the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to address the "no-rise" issue until LID formation is eminent. The "no-rise" issue does not affect construction of the first 425ft. of Wall Street. See Exhibits B and E. C. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION Right-of-way acquisition will be required from Ident. No's 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, X and Y. Assessed valuations for the land portion of these properties range from 0.62/ft2 to 4.00/ft2. Any right-of-way taking will require a full appraisal process. The expense of such process is not justified for this Preliminary Engineer's Report. The appraisal and acquisition process should not proceed until after the LID is formed. See Exhibit F for proposed right-of-way acquisition. For nominal estimating we have assumed that R/W values are based upon the premise that all land being assessed will be served by the proposed Wall Street Improvements and that land in the 100-year flood plain will have a value of only 25% of land outside the flood plain. An additional 25% of the taking cost is added for legal, administration and contingencies. Accordingly we have assigned an assessed valuation of land outside the flood plain at $3.75/ft2 and the net taking cost as (1.25)($3.75) = $4.69/ft2 and costs inside the flood plain as $4.69/4 = $1.17/ft2. See Exhibit G for calculation of estimated R/W costs. 6 D. RAILROAD SPUR TRACK ELIMINATION The railroad spur track in the easterly side of the proposed Wall Street right-of-way northeasterly of the railroad crossing is required to be removed as part of this project. The section of spur track to be eliminated extends across Hunziker Street serving two properties northeasterly of Hunziker, (Tax Lots 103 and 200, Map 2S 1 1 BD). Permission for discontinuation of service will have to be obtained from those property owners and acknowledged by railroad officials. See Exhibit B. Both properties have been contacted in the process of developing the Conceptual Engineer's Report. Tax Lot 103 is owned by HGM Group, LLC, and Property Manager is Cheryl L. Bennett of Norris, Beggs & Simpson. Cheryl Bennett advises that HGM Group, LLC has no 0 objection to removal of the spur tract providing that the spur extension behind their building is removed in its entirety and the area is graveled and leveled. Tax Lot 200, Tigard Distribution Center (TDC) is owned by Klokke Corporation and Property Manager is Walter Rivers of Deering Management Group, Inc. City staff ' corresponded and met with Fred Fields, Walt Rivers and Klokke Corporation's Attorney, Ron Ferguson, on August 23, 2001 regarding the extension of Wall Street from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard. City staff emphasized that the extension was important to Tigard's future transportation plans and that the removal of the spur tract was essential to the extension. At that meeting Ferguson indicated that his clients were not interested in releasing their interests to the railway spur. By letter of September 27, 2001, Ferguson to Gus Duenas, Ferguson reiterated the position of August 23, 2001 and stated further that "Under no circumstances would my client consider attempting to resolve this matter unless and until complete assurances and approval have been received guaranteeing the construction of Wall Street to its anticipated terminus on Hall Blvd.". Property representatives involved with proposed spur track removal have been kept apprised of the City's status in pursuing the formation of the LID and removal of the spur ~ track. `i Current discussions with Walt Rivers indicates that Klokke Corporation has not changed its position. The 2/26/03 letter from Rivers (Attachment 10) throws out a $500,000 figure. Walt agrees this is without benefit of appraisal background, and we would opinion that settlement could be for far less. Accordingly, considering the responses of both HGM Group, LLC and Klokke Corporation, for the spur tract to be removed, there will have to be a financial settlement e 7 with Klokke, the tracts between the buildings removed and the area smoothed with gravel. Any settlement of this issue would require a full appraisal process and extensive negotiation. The expense of such a process is not justified until the formation of the LID is imminent. A limited-scope Property Appraisal Consulting Report dated 6/9/03 was prepared by Hanna, McEldowney & Associates, suggests that there may be little difference in the value of industrial zoned land with rail services versus without rail service. For purposes of introducing a cost element relating to this issue, we have assigned a nominal $100,000 amount. See Attachment 10 for correspondence regarding spur track removal. E. SUMMARY OF PROJECT COSTS (See Exhibit H for construction cost breakdowns). Schedule A - Street Improvements 924,847 Schedule B - Storm Drain Improvements 334,031 ' Schedule C - Water Improvements 213,728 Schedule D - Signing, Striping & Illumination Improvements 78,472 Schedule E - Underground Utilities Improvements 134,760 ' Schedule F - Landscaping Improvements 137,308 Schedule G - Buffer Mitigation and Stream Restoration Improvements 185,651 Schedule H - Signalization Improvements 198,000 Schedule I - Sanitary Sewer Improvements 40,304 Schedule J - Railroad Crossing Improvements 440,000 Schedule K - Bridge Improvements 1,156,650 Total Construction Costs $3,843,751 Legal, Administrative & Engineering (20%) 768,750 Right-of-Way Acquisition 883,341 Spur Track Elimination Agreement 100,000 * Interest and Costs for Interim Financing 200,000 i TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $5,795,842 Total interest and costs for interim financing depends upon the available rate of interest and length of the project. A nominal amount of $200,000 has been used for the purpose of this report. 8 F. LID BOUNDARY The area benefited by the proposed improvements is comprised of large tracts which front on and will take access from Wall Street. Portions of some of the tracts are within the Fanno Creek 100-year flood plain. All tracts will require on-site improvements as they develop. See Exhibit F. G. RECOMMENDED ASSESSMENT METHODS All the benefited tracts are large and the proposed improvements provide basic and utility road facilities, enabling future extension into the tracts as they develop. Accordingly, the basic benefit is proportionately related to the area served by the basic and utility road facilities. The approximate 100-year flood plain line has been located for the purpose of evaluating developable area. While areas within the flood plain have significant value, the proposed improvements do not benefit flood plain areas to the degree that they benefit buildable areas. Accordingly, it is proposed that a factor of only 25% of the flood plain area be used in totaling net area for assessment calculations. Areas within tracts that are taken for right-of-way have not been used when calculating total areas to be assessed. e See Exhibit 1. H. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTS Calculations of the proposed assessments are shown on Exhibit I. Total preliminary assessments, property identification numbers (Ident Nos), Tax Lot and Tax Map numbers, owners and addresses are illustrated on Exhibit J (Preliminary Assessment Roll). The cost of extending the 10-inch sanitary sewer to serve properties No. 5 and No. 6 will be assessed directly to these properties on a square foot basis. No other assessments are proposed for sanitary sewers. Costs for assessment purposes are estimated as follow: Sanitary sewer extension to serve properties No. 5 and No. 6 $ 48,365 All other project costs $5,747,477 Total Costs to be Assessed $5,795,842 1. IMPORTANT and SIGNIFICANT ISSUES a. Elimination of West Pend and Revision to East Pond. (Comp. Plan Amendment) Proposed treatment of the ponds require a comprehensive plan amendment, inasmuch as the ponds are a regulated resource. It is believed that this will receive approval inasmuch as the pond areas will be replaced by restoration of the original 9 stream and planned wetland and buffer mitigation will enhance the area. Application and permits related to wetlands will have to be processed for approval through the Division of State Lands, Corps of Engineers (DSL/CE) and Clean Water Services (CWS) before construction can begin. The Comp Plan Amendment procedure is in process. b. Storm Drainage, Water Quality Improvements and Buffer Mitigation. Storm drainage, water quality improvements and stream buffer mitigation will require review and approval by Clean Water Services (CWS). C. SiQnalization and Connection at Hall Blvd. Approval of the Wall Street connection to Hall Blvd. and signalization of the intersection requires application and approval from ODOT. ODOT will probably require interconnect with existing signals on Hall Blvd. at Burnham and McDonald. The proposed Wall Street connection to Hall Blvd. does not meet ' ODOT spacing requirements. However, an exception to the spacing requirements has been approved by ODOT. See Attachment 13. d. At-Grade Railroad Crossing As discussed earlier, Portland & Western Railroad (PNWR) has contested the City's application for creation of the new railroad crossings, causing the City to request that ODOT Rail Division set the matter for public hearing. ODOT officials have indicated that "No decision has been reached and no staff position has been formulated at this time". See Attachments 7, 8 and 9. There have been discussions of an elevated crossing or an undercrossing to avoid objections of ODOT and PNWR. The existing tracks are elevated approximately loft, above adjacent ground on the Hall Blvd. side. Adding 23ft. required clearance, the IOft. to adjacent ground and a minimum beam depth of 4ft. totals 37ft. of grade differential. At 5%, this equals to approximately 740ft. of structure t or fill roadway on the portion extending to the Fanno Creek Bridge. Access problems would be created on both sides of the tracks, requiring frontage roads. Costs would be in the range of many millions, five or more. There were also discussions of an undercrossing. Similar grade and cost issues are involved along with the problem of facilities being constructed below the flood plain. e. Bridge Across Fanno Creek Initial thoughts were that a bridge span crossing Fanno Creek could be similar in length to recent replacement bridges that have been constructed across Fanno Creek. However, findings are that a new bridge (not a replacement bridge) would have to span the total floodway width (320ft), greatly increasing the cost of the bridge. 10 There has been discussion of petitioning the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) with an analysis and plan for reducing the floodway width and therefore enabling shortening of the bridge span. Rough estimates of costs involved in an application process to FEMA are $20,000 for expansion of survey data, $25,000 for modeling, analysis, mapping, notification of impacts, etc. and perhaps $5,000 for FEMA fees, a total in the 1 range of $51,000. Indications are that the process at FEMA would take not less than one year, after the receipt of the application, and there is no assurance the effort would be successful. Attachment 11, discusses the bridge construction, hydraulic investigation and the FEMA process, along with construction cost breakdowns. The preliminary bridge design has been included as Exhibit E. The estimated construction costs for the 320ft. bridge is $1,156,650. Even if a FEMA process were successful, it's unlikely the width could be shortened to less than, say 240ft. Cost reduction would not be linear. A 240ft. bridge might cost, say $900,000, still a substantial cost item. It is also anticipated that a bridge shorter than 320 feet would receive monumental objections from environmental advocates and rejection by DSL/COE. J. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS A neighborhood meeting was held 11/10/03 regarding the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to modify the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and Wetland and Stream Corridor Map. Agenda and minutes of that meeting are included in Attachment 12. K. STATUS SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Status a. Sensitive lands reviews, applications and permits with the Division of State Lands (DSL), the Corps of Engineers (COE) and Clean Water Services (CWS) are in the process. Initial plans were to proceed with applications and permits to accommodate the Phase 1 construction of the first 425ft of Wall Street. However, the permitting agencies (DSL and COE) have determined that they would only review applications • ' addressing the entire LID project. i I b. Signals at the Wall Street / Hall Blvd. Intersection. The Application for State Highway Approach (Wall Street to Hall Blvd.) has been approved, including an exception to ODOT spacing requirements. Approval by 11 ODOT allowing the City to signalize the Hall Blvd./Wall Street intersection is currently under advisement. C. No-Rise Issue. Federal regulations require that any encroachment into the regulated floodway must result in 0.00 (no-rise) increase in the floodway elevation. Analysis showed that a multi-span bridge that spans the 320- foot floodway was the minimum length bridge option that would comply with the Federal "no-rise" in the regulated floodway requirement. Accordingly, a bridge consisting of four 80-foot spans totaling 320 feet is recommended. See Exhibit E. The Tigard Community Development Code calls for "no-rise" in the 100yr. base flood event. The 100yr. base flood event is approximately 500ft. wide at the bridge location. Accordingly, construction of the 320ft. bridge will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. This amendment should not be pursued until LID formation is eminent. S d. Spur Track Removal. There will have to be a financial settlement with Kokke Corporation in order to secure authorization to remove the spur track. e. Assessments against property are allowed to be bonded up to an amount ' equal to the assessed valuation of the property less any outstanding assessments. Exhibit J (Preliminary Assessment Roll) indicates that all the estimated preliminary assessments are well within their bonding capacity. 2. Summary Salient issues are as follow: a. Environmental permitting with DSL, COE, CWS, ODF&W, DEQ, and City. b. Tigard Comp. Plan Amendment. C. Tigard Sensitive Lands Review. d. ODOT Rail approval of the Railroad-Highway Crossing Safety Application. e. MOT approval of signalizing the Hall Blvd./Wall Street intersection. It appears that all issues, with the exception of the railroad crossing approval, can be properly dealt with and would not prohibit proceeding with the LID as proposed. 12 Elimination of the railroad crossing from the project would defeat the City's opportunity to make the through connection from Hall Blvd. to Hunziker Street, but could still provide access to the benefited properties. 3. Recommendations Our immediate recommendation is that Council should take the LID formation under advisement until the railroad crossing decision is in hand. Subsequent Recommended Action: a. If the City receives a positive railroad crossing decision, Council should approve the Preliminary Engineer's Report and call for the public hearing on formation of the LID. b. If the crossing decision is initially negative, the Council may wish to exhaust the appeal process. C. If the ultimate railroad crossing decision is negative the Council may wish to consider asking that the Preliminary Engineer's Report be revised to propose a project that excludes the railroad crossings. d. Or, if the ultimate railroad crossing decision is negative, the Council may wish to terminate the LID proceedings. Respectively Submitted, ~ 44~ Marlin J. DcH , P.E., P.L.S. 13 1 H W r • - ~ s _ - _ e v ~ City of Tigard o services services al Proposed Wall Street Extension ° Fishman J S, LC easwuuns n acaaor u~° MTIML aFlOn11C! MlNefttaT ~ R BU 1 C~ ~O . ` VARNS i 2Sr02AA000 1 j FIR III OUARA 2sro2DDOMW t I j / Q,bY ; - 2sro2oriao33ou ;c.~;° " ~ 2sr02DD00eoo _ TECH CENTS ARTWR JOHN M VNE y~ DEEANN MC NALD T CHAR 2 2 Key to Features Figure A-a. Aksmativss Anaysis Streams (CWS; modified by FES along project site area AlOemffiives based on topographic survey) Surveyed Project Site WcCLYv ds (DeHaas) , 5 t 4 ® 7 Dats:12.042003 Library and Fenno Pointe Water (FES Approx.) New I Tigard Poirda Developments 2- °a 5 e G5: R Gutisrro= ® Floodway (FIRM) Street 3 ® 6 ® 91 FlaodplahT (METRO) --4- Raliroad • 2 = Previous preferred aaemative Location: G:12003}03077 Tiglgislapr 9 ° Proposed Proles Unmapped wedands may be present east of Fens Creek and have not been delineated s i I I I ~ pm PUE RAY RI ^-----j ~j'------- I- ¢ ° as, 70 as' as' W4 0,5' 4' 74' 14' 00 B•R, Irotwl C f Trawl PART OF twe I,a, Nm wo two Lune SIGNALIZED e= TL I TL 600. I l s t uar f u INTERSECAON .I rii , I 3.1 A I 4.22 AC / 2x 25x 1 zsx x ~ I 5 A f- I 1 Nax „m N I Vdowafk - Carp ! attr - Std • 0.ACC J14--O- rock ' Std datal' dotal No. I127a 11' 'ro~k No. 120 Mkk 1 '-0 e / Gas D*Cfrk TC . -0,15' I - 1 I / voctrk TL 690 T~yw a au~ ~ j 0.20 AC WALL STREET TYPICAL SECTION I EE tk GENERAL f TL 300e cR 2.93 AC III I / PUE I R/N PUE 11 R~ as, 70' as, 6' E.S' _18! 18, - ON ~15X~ w, 12~ 12' wl 6' Bye iwo Tra tw 1 iL- y lm-Time Lane taH 1 0% 2S 253X 253x ~ u~r V ( 5' AC Slded k curb - cCara d C 1fx.- td ACC / Std dotal G. , 1e5 J" Nfck J14'-O'rork OOE OCE No. 120 12' thkk 1'-0' rack TL 1200 25.60 AC Gas Gas TC - max Goctrk TL 1201 iLphole WALL STREET TYPICAL SECTION 6.32 AC / ~~_cawo AT RAILROAD SPUR TRACK / TO BE REMOVED/ ST TL 1202 REET LIGHT I ~ R/W 9.78 AC IL - ® Rw as as' 6' 250 Q( 6 18, 1g z. s 12' -12' BAe II crawl crawl fJAe tae l `am two cane TL 800 sx ~x z~ 24,37 AC EXHIBIT B TL 200 KLOKKE CORPORATION J 6.26 AC GENERAL STREET ALIGNMENT, saes , , tJ l TYPICAL SECTIONS, BRIDGE, 6Nd9e aal LIGHTING, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND RAILROAD Tc = f~~ TL 103 CROSSING. WALL STREET TYPICAL SECTION HGM GROUP, LLC AT BRIDGE ~I 6.26 AC JEX 6" WATER 1------- I-~- rLn 77- - 7 , 12' PART OF ; TL 0 _ TL 600 .4I 3,2 A i 0 4.22 AC J~ f zr~L WATER WATER QUALITY x I FACILITY TL 690 O,aO AC i , I TL 300b ;i ~ 2,93 AC IOX ' r.._.._.._.._.. ..-..-.WATER QUALITY FACILITY],.--* STORM DRAIN i' pQ~~i/ % ' TL 1200 SANITARY SEWER 26.32 AC TL 1201 ;9 \ WATER LINE 6.32 AC / I I i'ppi \ ~ w% ~~'e 0 / JP/ i STORM DRAW \ IL 1202 9.78 AC WATER LINE 250' TL 1100 rc aoo 13.21 AC 24.37 AC EX 8" WATER i % i EXHIBIT C i , STORM DRAIN, SANITARY EX 12" WA TER SEWER, WATER AND hi/ WATER QUALITY i i - - - - - - 11 If irl OREGON DEPAIZTMENT~OF TRANSPORTATION Doc et No. RX RAII, DIVISION 555 13th Street NE Ste 3 Salem, Oregon 97301-4179 ODOT Crossing No RAILROAD-HIGHWAY CROSSING SAFETY APPLICATION US DOT No. SECTION 1. (To be filled out completely by applicant ) e 1.1. Name of Applicant: City of Tigard Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, OR 97223 Contact Person: Agustin Duenas Telephone No. (503) 639-4171 1.2. Application is made under statutory authority: (check appropriate box) 1 0 ORS 824.204 - New grade crossing ❑ ORS 824.206 - Alteration of an existing grade crossing ❑ ORS 824.208 - Construction of a new separated crossing ❑ This project is to be constructed under a contract let by ODOT. 1.3. Location of the proposed project: Street or Highway name SW Wall Strcet City Tigard - County Washington Jurisdiction City of Tigard Public Authority in Interest Railroad name and name of track Two tracks: Portland and Western RR Tillamook District, Portland and Western RR Oregon Electric District (Formerly Southern Pacific) Railroad milepost Tillamook MP 750.42 and Oregon Electric MP 33.0 Nearest railroad station Tigard 1.4. List contact information for the Railroad and Road Authority directly affected by the project: (see instructions for definitions of "Party" and "Interested Person") NOTE: Pursuant to ORS Chapter 824, only a Railroad or Public Authority may file an application seeking authority to construct, relocate, alter or close a railroad-highway crossing. Railroad Road Authority Interested Person Name Charles Kettenrin John Trumbull Organization Portland and Western RR Union Pacific Railroad Title AVP Engineering Manager Public Projects Address 650 Hawthorne Ave. 5929 S.E. McLoughlin Suite 220 Blvd. City, ST, Zip Salem, OR 97301 Portland, OR 97202 form 735-9202 (10/03) Mctric MOM. Telephone 1-503-365-1717 503-872-1809 / Interested Person Interested Person. Interested Person ' Naive Or d iization Title. ' Address City, ST, Zip Telephone 1 1.5. Describe here or attach the scope of the proposed project in detail. (See attached 1.5 narrative and map) 1.6. Attach drawings that provide plan views, profiles and cross-sections of the proposed construction. Drawings must comply with OAR 741-200-0050. Number of drawing pages attached: ❑ Note: All plan drawings must be in metric units and their English equivalents. 1.7. Will this be a separated crossing? ❑ Yes ® No If no, state reasons why a separated crossing will not be constructed.. A grade separated crossing would not allow access to the adjacent properties due to minimum Grade requirements and structure costs. This applies to either an elevated crossing or a depressed crossing. A depressed crossing would fall below the 100-yr. flood plain. _ 1.8. Is there an alternate access route to the area to be served by the crossing`.' ® Yes [I No Describe or attach map showing details: Alternate access from S.W. Hall Blvd. is to travel north on Hall Blvd. across the existing, at-grade crossing at SW Hall Blvd., turn right, to the SE, onto SW Hunziger, then turn right, heading SW, onto SW Wall St. Travel distance for the alternate route is,5,450' versus 3,200' with the new crossing. (See attached map). 1.9. Describe how this project is required by the public safety, necessity, convenience and general welfare. (See attached 1.9 narrative and map) G i >i 1.10 Upon completion of the proposed project, will it be possible to close any existing grade crossings in the area? ® Yes ❑ No Explain: As part of the Wall Street project, the spur track between the proposed crossing and Hunziker Street and its extension across Hunziker will be removed, eliminating the Hunziker crossing. (See attached map). If yes, complete Section 4. 2 1.2 The Railroad 6` List Tracks from N ❑ or E N to S ❑ or W N Name of track Angle of Elevation in Alignment Alignment Nearest Nearest intersection relation to N N or E S N or W switch switch adjacent track and distance ❑ ❑of < 914 m < 914 m from adjacent of crossing crossing N N or E S N or W ❑ track (multiple ❑from from track crossing) crossing crossing i Tillamook District 85 +0.5', 93' Tangent Tangent None 350' (to be removed Oregon Electric 85 -0.5', 93' Tangent Tangent None None District Train Use of the Crossing: Daily train movements over the crossing (average per day) Type of train Number of Maximum speed Typical train speed Average makeup of movements authorized observed train o. of cars Freight train 4 30 25 45 Passenger train (future 30 70 Switching movement 4 30 25 45 2.2. VISIBILITY FOR DRIVERS APPROACHING THE CROSSING (Distance down the track that a driver can view an approaching train.) ' At the STOP position N ❑ or E N of track looking lcfl 792 in At the STOP position N ❑ or E N of track looking right 50.3 m At the STOP position S ❑ or WE) of track looking left 457 m At the STOP position S ❑ or W® of track looking right_ 44.1 m At the SSD. position N ❑ or E.N of track looking left 24.6 m At the SSD O osition N ❑ or - E'® of track lookin right 17.8 m At the SSD position S ❑ or WN of track looking left 18.2 m At the SSD position S ❑ or WN of track looking right 17.2 m ® (SSD= Safe Stopping Distance - see table in instructions) ® Will these sight distances change on completion of the project? ❑ Yes N No e Explain Sight distances have been calculated based upon City planning code's minimum setback requirements of 0' from the edge of the railroad property, and 30' from the Wall St. right-of-way. i Will drivers' vision of devices to be installed at the crossing be obstructed on the approaches within 152 meters of the crossing (obstructions include parked vehicles)? ❑ Yes N No I If yes, describe obstruction and what will be done to alleviate this problem. 5 Traffic Control Devices To Be Installed At The Crossing: T~ ' +G+::R•Yf`Jtl-i' Y Tiv1.:r i1t" ' DF,, - CFr: Wlip will: Vlio-'Mil Wlio;wilfL YZesponsit~itli cfo c ist: 16ffiirnisliing ,t7 7, CIODE 3i' furnisi> install maintain:' antd installing,device (indicate She device?: 'device? device And ' source. of funds;an4 percentage of instructions) (list quantity ) (list quantity) bear the re§ponsiliility maintenance (mush-100%) cost? - (list uanti.... RR PA RR PA RR PA ]EM PA GCPA OTHER NO. 1 NO. 1M 2 X 2 100% NO. IS NO. IT No.2 4 X 4 100% No. 2B No. 2P No.4 4 X 4 100% SAS AWS 2 X 2 100% AWS-2 e AWS-3 AWS 4 AWPM 2 X 2 100% DNSOT SCL 4 X 4 100% ' TS ATSI ILL GR BC 100, x 100, 100% CSBR X X 100% CSOR X X 100% ES AES NOTE: PA = Public Road Authority RR = Railroad GCPA = State Grade Crossing Protection Account a a 6 1011 0- M SECTION 4 - PERMANENAOSSING CLOSURE 4.1. Name and location of crossing to be closed (if different from crossing described in 1.3.) S.W. Hunzikcr Rd. Tigard Ln t_~:-=":' Washin ton Jun~sdicf~o --L City of Tigard :~;ai7roadZ~ameAand~name.:of ti•ack;:.,::~ Spur track = il=gad=MR 1, `--Wear sQ9li`oail sta>ron 3 4.2. Describe in detail two alternate routes available in place of the closed crossing. Include the circuitry distance involved in the use of each route from the midpoint of the area served by the existing crossing to the major destination points. Route 1: No change in roadway traffic. Circuitry Distance: This route will use existing railroad-highway grade crossing No. N/A Vehicle traffic on this alternate route will be increased by N/A AADT Route 2 N/A Circuitry Distance: This route will use existing railroad-highway grade crossing No. N/A Vehicle traffic on this alternate route will be increased by N/A AADT. 4.3. Will the crossing closure adversely affect emergency services currently using the crossing? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, list each affected emergency service in SECTION 1.4. as a "PARTY" in this matter. Explain the extent of the effect and the steps to be taken to overcome the adverse effect. i a 4.4. Will a pedestrian and/or bicycle crossing be maintained at the site of the crossing to be closed? ❑ Yes ® No 8 LLD RAWING PLOTTED AT A" TYP. if THE NOTED SCALE Std No. 2 Flashing Light & Std, No. 4 ' Automatic Gate Signals, see detail 2. 2' TYP O Barrier Curb w/7" (ace. Curb to begin not m 2 less than 10' from frock centerline and Q extend not less than 50' in advance of crossing signals. O Sidewalks sholl cross frocks of a 90 25' 25' degree angle, q~ Median to begin not less than 10' from tp' S0' SEE PLAN R R ° 0~ T track centerline, g? O Advance warning pavement markings (AWPM). WIDTH MAY VARY ADVANCE WARNING SIGN (AWS) C~pY~(19C~ $W VVALJ' On multi-lone roads the traverse lines sholl 8' ACCORDING TO LANE WDTH TO BE 16"0, INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE 9~vv9 , extend across all approach lanes, and3ndividual llr µ)p1 MUTCD• RXR symbols should be used for each approach lane. Per OAR 741-110-0040 (11) see detail 1 Cf3C;l; I e °w ADVANCE WARNING PAVEMENT MARKINGS A' =STOP CLEARANCE LINE AWPM . ON MULTI-LANE ROADS THE 12' MIN. FROM NEAREST RAIL Stop clearance line 12' min. tion where nearest roil TRANSVERSE LINES SHALL EXTEND OR 1' IN ADVANCC OF THAT or 1' in advance r that location gae br ACROSS ALL APPROACH LANES, AND LOCATION WHERE GATE ARM arm crosses the roadway. Per OAR INDIVIDUAL RXR SYMBOLS SHOULD BE CROSSES THE ROADWAY. 741-110-0040 (10) See detail I. LANE USED ON EACH APPROACH LANE VICINITY MAP Advance warning sign (AWS) to be installed CENTERLINE DETAIL 1 N. TS. in accordance with OAR 741-110-0040 (11), N. TS w M I~ see detail . Z ' t I I + ~ I p UTURE BUILbJ~SO j v';;F~°'q I pp Q /1" / / (152 k ,--IhNf arfA25L m,Do,a ~Tae a; aam) II ' _AcDD q wl/ w 6.00 1 1 99 i A ` It 17' / FUTURE BUILDING I 500 1'mw ~~LlLll111/1/1/1/1/j1 / sa (s~ lr So (9.Im) Sa1Ea ¢ 0'(61m) - - _ 30' (9.fm)AfDaA Fmn Prop. ~.ROW, a?G~ 3 I W -r I - x'211 •.~dr Lhr ~J~ \ PLAN IgTJ/ r '.oD I SO 121. --,_(31. J Scale: 11=20' y09'Y R j FFF (d7m)`. 3t a I, 2 j{dl~ Rte. Nb93baf ROW 1 `I I 5 A ~ 5.00' I I w aoa' I 3 (ram) (l.am) i1 SIGNAL LIGHTS ill + FACING BOTH ° I g~ 2 10910' g 2 1g n (1.54 5 DIREC77ONS u r0 SW WALL STI +h 6 6 I N I 2 +0a TOP V)fW + 111±00g ~ _ - --W 0--ifC I ~ _ •1-testy r O - / - 8 t g 2' CLEAR MN. ~ 4 2 6 1 2 4 ps00m) 8 ry (dkn) a 1 4 q I (r.sm) ~ ry 12 aoy aoo' 500, 7" DIA. RED LIGHTS WW GO 0 (tsn) p.e*) / DOUBLE SIDED ~ S V Q; aoo' (r.-si 1 q . / J- EA. BATE 7 1Fr* wog soul aow • - ; o t 8~ 8 SR 1200' I~0 ftBlhq 7rxA to b* ftmwwd W t~ 0 ~~sY+srr ~3I Lai 2. oo' n. 3 a$f1 (a7m) i~r" y w ' "`,use 3,1 3.too 3 ~g°c I .30' Pm ROW ~(er~ s F I g 3 F ~l 3'-6" MIN. 16' ALTERNATE RffLECTOR17E0 _ _ _ _ _ _ fboat rm4 Pfoi Row \ rn I ~a E itt ah~" X/// F// 4'6" MAX. RED AND WNItE BANDS ®45' v ( UILDING FUTURE W = _ All I Jm) -2 FUTURE BUILDIN` worn / ri- DAVID EVANS AIM- n.~m ~000• DETAIL 2 ® C1 eNOASSOCIATESINC. _ z>aoP v 1 N. T.S moo' (2r. ) wf W,r n 3000' (laim I o rA9A wm99s9T r 1 SHEET DEHAAS S.W.- a DATE ' REVISION NO... BY .SSA tflQScr_ 9150 St. Wma Gck R "Po +0 n k Will ir• Otpon 97010 - DESIGNED BY. RGA WALL STREET EXTENSION V y 17252 ♦ u_ u DRAWN OC RDA >it St Cowwi I tes, Inc. - CxECRED BY. SOY ouwi " oueOot li{(icm A Surrgon R R CROSSING EXHIBIT "NE.- (507) 982-2450 1] F ' DATE: 11/21/03' N tA' - FAY: 981-4018 SCALE: AS SHOWN rx e CITY OF TIGARD TILLAMOOK MP 15D.42 AND OREGON ELECTRIC MP 33.0 0495 [nw[t n.xe[ DATE November 21, 20D.j (ILL WALtST-RR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECT NO. ME LOCATION.WALL91_RR.DWO - a`~\ DRAWING PIOfD Al 4 I C+, NAIi THE NOTED SCALE + 4>, p % % 1 : 0• ' r . a ' , 0- 1- w PLAN' W , L , I! 1 ;f ! W Scale.- 11-20' f t l 1 / P ~r J < ',1~•iv;l:~,+hfi _~"i i~i ~ rr I r_; r 44 /~~y, , ~f.. S 1 S'f' ' 4 ,S r - , L L CO 1 \ \ t • • e: 1r l,' r , a , ~J\ ~"'Y • e • e • • e • e ^ "Y" O c\l + 04 f- ~ I 100' VC (K = 45.66) 100' VC (K = J2.75J p ti o m H El 56.43 o . b tlbtl .,d t~ N n Ub S N d. m h c%4 N S h S vi W x) 4y, >h N hh Q O AIO q n O Obib m 4 h Ojx L0 UU 160 + + b h h tl Op, Np O b h r xi pV] O W W WN b1 Oy, b Al co p x1 V xl b Nx1 Nn + + x1co vLSI NW 0h NS h] 4 rytl bn np h Nh. N^ + `r co b Nh N _N RW .tj W N W N h 155 00693 - _ Sa 0.01296 S = -0.006 - 0.00893 - Fnlsh de at ~ (rode of exist EP 150 150 S. 0. 3946 7R = op of fOExist. gr nd 145 of 145 .140 d' 140 a ~ o y 1.35 o J a P FILE Scale: fi0i}.11 20' 1J0 W n ro b ro N m .1 m n h o w N N N V N n h c4 O n N b xl b to A O b U p n O p n xl 01 h b N N h -23 Qo ri y y1 xi vi vi vi xi t 'C ,C •1 0 w b b n h h n h n A 1~ Op of o; of 0 0 b h 7. tl tl tl tl . p m v to V tl 7 y, h x1 b b xl xl h h .121 125 M1' 25+20 15+60 16+00 26+40 16: 20+80 21+10 11+60 22+00 21+40 12+80 2J+20 2J+60 24+00 24+40 •14+60 Na By sa,ooo-7atmx SHEET G.AtE DEHAAS srwsc =Ox WALL STREET - LID X DESNFNEO BY. Y1D, LM Sit?~iiai y'Y,f rhnae. DRAM BY: W e'9 an ,SOC ,a,CS., n , In~MBY ~W,o 4 9 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS pNow~ (Solt stt-trso oArt xx-zx-zz Ee:-role OF , CITY OF TICARD STREET SCALE: AS SHOMM Ux PRO.ECI N0. 619 BAfC NOIrfMBfR ,5; 200,E FILE - 02.629.lIB CNCINCCRINC OEPAAiNFNr ERL LOCATION: FIIC-ICCAij ON t N~ b~ „h N N~ 3% r, ro m o ~ 03 r ~ ro n wt v 0 r E h h n n o~ h in n h 155 N YI 40 h 'NI N WEST AIL LNE 154 J 00 1+00 1+00 0+00 1+00 2+00 J+00 I' v 151 ti m ^ 106, V ` rid A N Vi to h h to ^ ^ h b to q N r0 MO t h vmi 0 3 N h 0 u ^ + h rl ^ ° ~ 156 ~ M h yh ~Nn u~j ~ EAST AIL LNE IL 155 00 1+00 1+00 0+00 1+00 2+00 J+00 H` H : PROFILE • Stole: Horir. 1'=40' W J; j De7E REVISION. NO. BY Exp.-f7JI/OJ Sutel00-ILCEmIv SHEET DEHAAS 945riW.Cm aC;r9M w mym BY. ALL STREET - LID , DESIGNED OM NA' ,der f ksllsocis, ti~ -R Ina GNECKEDB@ UJO N uu"Fgle«"'SxhmN STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS N"E (50) 682-2450 DAtt: 11/05/03 ruE ru-air SCALE: As SHOWN @1x1 oA~ CITY OF TICARD RAILROAD PROFILE OF , rxf LOCxR(ry0i_619\WAlEST xUCN - = PROJECT NO. 619 OAIC NOVEMBER 5, 2003 rid 02629.) IB ENDINEERINO DEPARTMENT a J20=0' clr.-clr. end bents I& '-o *precast prestressed slobs ea span '0' 80:0' 'elevations shown ore ' 80'-0' 80=0' 80 SPm 4 (inish _crode at CL bents Profile grade a o SPa! 1 o Spat Z SPan J 0 r o h P CL roadway =,a O~ `~°m 0.0118 W ° e h e h Proposed w slrcelcre II 1. 144,8 ' o GRADELINE DIAGRAM I1~ , r-M 0'14 W 1 1 D 3 ° ~EG j. y, o i ~fl. 14891 i 1 , 87'4 NO SCALE - h 0 V° 1 II i ~ II 1~1 1 ~ ~ 3 UV~ ° C( roadway 1~ v to ° to H I 8-O SEC. I, T. 2 S, P. I W, WM 55-2 'Ioper, I wingwol, ryp. LOCATION MAP Std 20'-4'bridge lyp ea side, end panel ea end this end PLAN Nu scALE t'=GO' Pedestrian roil on sidewalk momled C1 bent concrete pcrcpel CL 8ent I IL Bent 2 CZ Sent 3 Cc Bent 4 C1 Bent 5 JJ6'-0" edes1rion roil ea side Proil sifinish rded ' concrete pargael ed fin 160 (finish 150 Sidewalk $ 140 1.5.1, typ cz fx~ islin ound ° IJO j0=0' wide , kPPI&O575 steel 9 gr 0 0roadway CL ° 2=6' bike polh pipe pile, lyp. slob 120 m Il0 Remove berm 100 yr. flood , W £1.141.1 100 £sl. lip £l. 550 lyp. i Finish ELEVATION t,-60 Bode Wingwoll CL roadway 50-O'out-oul 1.0 6'-0. J6=0" 6=0' 1'0" syw IL rail s/w Pedestrion roll on roodwroy rail WINGWALL DETAIL sidewalk mocnled 12- 2=6'x '-O'precos1 concreld porapef p trek sed concrete o. 2'naaACW5 5I28 S1..2$ Naa.SUEICB •y _ I; CONSUlT1NC EUGEKIAEnf, 07EGa` QgEGW7Wa1 J :w j' { : , ~J • - ENGINEERS uwgeea ~uwgee~me ' .•S./• "rte `•'s' sr OATE DESCMPTION r-i r-i r-I r~ rt ri PPMOU75 FANNO CR. (WALL ST.) BRIDGE steel pipe pale, /yP• TIGAM OREGON TYPICAL DECK SECTION TYPE, SIZE d LOCATION -1 1 8'=f-0' o[s Diu Ga le a lhle , P. F. Pao w 604-19rt. ! OF 2 / nuwH FGC wm me la DATE [fC1CY11 Figure I anzroz aazsr.IAr crs~cwl~+Vtlc^aIArADI r_qlW400j Ol_c07S r ID TAX LOT AREA (SF) AREA (SF) AREA (SF) AREA (SF) NUMBER NUMBER a b c d _ 1 1 100 71,034 39,042 20,796 - - _ - _ ~_3WfG4LL;- - _ - 2 200 50,733 60,415 16,314 14,550 f --r- j'--, 3a 3002 119,451 ~II----~---- - 1T 36 3006 16,988 88 110,752 f a pot of n Bu? - - - - - - i I 4 1200 792,602 297,722 22,058 2,754 2S 122+ 5 1100 547894 _ 27534 - i Sbwt \4h \ ~of r / 115 / 6 800 996,019 - 65,538 97??S 7 1202 426,017 - ZTAVr 4.2 8 1201 250,835 24_464 ' 1It I I`~ I $180,844 9 600 85,495 99,941 - 10 690 - 8,712 6,936 11,412 ' I / _ _ - fJ 150 - IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ASSESSABLE AREA OUTSIDE FLOOD PLAIN J,~~~1~\ = © ASSESSABLE AREA INSIDE FLOOD PLAIN poll S \ 7,,` ~I~'~ AAA g 690 yp ?s ! 721 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION OUTSIDE FLOOD PLAIN 7,14 ~ ~tt ,~s ~ P. ~ 82824 ~y~ ~ ~ RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION INSIDE FLOOD PLAIN r ptir i i. Of 97282 a2o RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED 9Y FRED FIELDS $3,565 r/ X09%' / Q RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED BY FANNO POINTE 701/ LID BOOUNDARY X09° / / N. \\I \ i Of / (~iAI HY IL 12W R 1201 Mcl, ?S 1 1 F W vapf as r 1 i W. Fklde SW P. 0. COE 529 truln9 Ca, /r find 114,9 GbwnPa't P. Bay 520 r Or 97201 Ch. 44017 \ ?d60 Ac 8. $1,419,239 j` • $410,590 7Z 1202 Map 2S I I CO., LID BOUNDARY R o. Bar 520 i • painvsWlde, Oh. "077 9.78 Ac /r i i' I $697,343 L I ` 250' heel W. as 1 , Fleft J ff49 SW Av*nd i % ld al Ac I rz 8O0 Map 25 1 1 $914,006 fiord w R&W 5"DOW or. 1 1149 poiVand f /r ri 14.37A EXHIBIT I $1,661,577 LID BOUNDARY, ASSESSABLE AREAS, RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION AREAS AND TOTAL ASSESSMENTS /°'~T.®.._..e.._.,-.~,._..~.._.. .~..-.._.LID BOUNDARY I l L pjprl Wall Street LID Estimated Right-of-Way Costs March 1, 2004 Ident. Tax Lot c d Total No. No. Area R/W OFP Area R/W IFP $4.69c $1.17d R/W Costs 1 100 0 20,796 0 24,331 24,331 2 200 16,314 14,550 76,513 17,024 93,537 3a 300a 0 0 0 0 3b 300b 0 0 0 0 4 1200 22,058 2,754 103,452 3,222 106,674 5 1100 27,534 0 129,134 0 129,134 6 800 65,538 0 307,373 0 307,373 7 1202 0 0 0 0 0 8 1201 24,464 0 114,736 0 114,736 9 600 0 0 0 0 0 10 690 0 0 0 0 0 X R/W 6,936 11,412 32,530 13,352 45,882 y R/W 13,150 0 61,674 0 61,674 $883,341 C-- R/W Area Outside Flood Plain (OFP) $4.69ft2 d= R/W Area Inside Flood Plain (IFP) $1.17ft2 s i i 7 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE WALL STREET Phase 1 (425 feet) and Phase 2 (2775 feet) March 1, 2004 Schedule A - Street Improvements Phase 1 (425111 Phase 2 (2775ft) ftem No. Description Quantity 425tL Unit Unit Price Total Quantity 2775 Unit Unit Price Total A-1 Mobilization An Lump Sum $8,400.00 $8 400 All Lump Sum $32,000. 00 $32, A-2 TP & DT (Traffic Protection and An Lump Sum 10,000.00 10,000 All Lump Sum 10,000.00 10,000 Direction of Traffic A-3 Dust and Erosion/Sedimentatfon Control An Lump Sum 4,000.00 4.000 An Lump Sum 7.000.00 7.000 A-4 Clearing SGrubbing All Lump Sum 10.000.00 10, AN Lump Sum 25000.00 25,000 A-5 Remove Existing Piping in Est 300(1 An Lump Sum 1,500.00 1500 A-6 Stripping 5.294 Square Yards 2.50 13235 8100 Square Yards 3.00 24.300 A-7 Embankment 2,818 Cubic Yards 10.00 28,180 12800 Cubic Yards 8.00 102,400 A-8 Su rade Stabilization 40 Cubic Yards 35.00 1400 60 Cubic Yards 35.00 2,100 A.9 Trim Existing A.C. 130 Lineal Feet 1.50 195 200 Lineal Feet 1.50 300 A-10 Remove Portions of Existing Sidewalk, An Lump Sum 1,000.00 1,000 Curb and A.C. Pat A-11 Remove Temporary Fanno Pointe Access An Lum Sum 1'500.00 1500 A-12 Construct/Reconstruct Water Quality AN Lump Sum 2,000.00 2,000 An Lump Sum 3,000.00 3,000 Swale (Complete) A43 21-0 Crushed Rock 873 Cubic Yards 27.00 23.571 1450 Cubic Yards 28.00 40,600 A-13a Place Salvo ed Balest Rock 3000 Square Yards 10.00 30,000 A-14 3A" Crushed Rock 215 Cubic Yards 28.010 6,020 1115 Cubic Yards 29.00 32,335 A-15 Standard Curb 310 Lineal Feet 8.50 2.635 A-16 Curb and Gutter 830 Lineal Feel 10.00 8,3M 4850 Lineal Feet 11.00 53.350 A-17 A.C. Pavement 678 Tons 44.00 29,832 3450 Tons 46.00 '158.700 A-18 4' Concrete Sidewalk and ADA Rams 5,110 Square Feet 3.40 17 374 2800 Square Feel 3.50 98.000 A-19 6' Concrete Sidewalk and Apron 1,080 Square Feet 4.00 4.320 520 Square Feet 4.10 2,132 A-20 Gravel Pathway All Lump Sum 400.00 400 A-21 Adiusl Existing Manholes 3 Each 750.00 2,2 50 1 Each 750.00 750 A-22 Adjust Existing Sanitary Cleanouts 2 Each 350.00 700 A-23 Remove Spur Tracks All Lump Sum 42 000.00 42000 Subtotal $176,812 $663,967 Contingencies (10%) 17.681 66.397 Total Schedule A $194,493 $730,364 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE WALL STREET Phase 1 (425 feet) and Phase 2 (2775 feet) March 1, 2004 Schedule B - Storm Drain Improvements Phase 1 (425ft) Phase 2 (277514:1 Item No, Description Quantity 425tt. Unit Unit Price Total Quanti 2775 Unit Unit Price Total B-1 Mob0izallon Ali Lump Sum $900.00 =900 AN Lump Sum $13,500.00 $13,500 B-2 TP & DT (Trait Protection and An Lump Sum 100.00 100 AN Lump Sum 1,000.00 1,000 Diredirn of Traffic B-3 Dust and EroskNSedimentation Control An Lum Sum 100.00 100 AN Lump Sum 1.000.00 1.000 64 Clearing d Grubbim AO Lump Sum 50.00 50 AB Lump Sum 1,000.00 1,000 B-5 Trench Foundation 20 Lineal Feel 10.00 200 35 Lineal Feet 12.00 420 B-6 10' PVC (Complete) 265 Lineal Feet 37.00 9,605 540 Lineal Feet 38.00 20,520 B-7 12, PVC (Complete) 35 Lineal Feet 40.00 1.400 165 Lineal Feet 42.00 6.9W B-7a 15' Concrete (Complete) 227 Lineal Feet 45.00 10,215 B-7b 18' Concrete (Complete) 223 Lineal Feet 50.00 11,150 B-7c 24' Concrete (Complete) 701 Lineal Feet 55.00 38,555 B-7d 27' Concrete (Complete) 1.144 Lineal Feet 6000 68,640 B-8 Inlet Catch Basin CB-30 2 Each 1,200.00 2,4 00 15 Each I .W0.00 19, B-9 WQ Manhole 1 Each 800.00 800 1 Each 5,000.00 5,000 BAD 48' Manholes 1 Each 3.000.00 3.000 9 Each 3.000.00 27100 B-11 Ditch Inlet 1 Each 800.00 800 4 Each 850.00 3,400 0-12 W Manholes 4 Each 4,000.00 16,000 B-13 Class 100 Riprap 7 Square Yards 40.00 280 B-14 Railroad Bore 160 Lineal Feet 250.00 40 000 Subtotal $19,555 $284,110 Contingencies (10%) 1_,955 28.411 Total Schedule 8 $21,510 $312,521 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE WALL STREET Phase 1 (425 feet) and Phase 2 (2775 feet) March 1, 2004 Schedule C - Water Improvements Phase 1 (425ft) Phase 2 (2775ft) Item No. Description Quantity 425ft Unit Unit Price Total Quantity 2775ft Unit Unit Price Total C-1 Mobilization An Lump Sum $980.00 $980 AN Lump Sum $8,200. 00 $8 ,200 C-2 TP b DT (Traffic Protection and All Lump Sum 100.00 100 All Lump Sum 1,300.00 1,300 Direction of Traffic) C-3 Dust and Eroslon/Sedimenta8on Control All Lump Sum 100.00 100 AN Lump Sum 350.00 350 C4 Clearinci 3 Grubbing All Lump Sum 100.00 100 All Lump Sum 700.00 700 C-5 6' Ductile Iron Pi Class 52 9 Lineal Feet 9.00 81 40 Lineal Feel 8.00 320 C-5a 8' Ductile Iron Pi Class 52 155 Lineal Feet 12.00 1.8w C-6 12' Ductile Iron Pipe (Class 52) 405 Lineal Feet 15.60 6,318 2,755 Lineal Feel 15.00 41,325 C-7 Trench Excavation (Common and Class B 405 Lineal Feet 21.00 8,505 2.11W Lineal Feet 20.00 52,600 BacldJl G7a Hang Pi on Bridge AN Lump Sum 2000.00 2,000 C-8 Trench Foundation 20 Lineal Feet 10.00 200 20 Lineal Feel 5.00 100 C-9 Ductile fron Fitti s 410 Pounds 3.00 1,230 4,600 Pounds 2.60 12,880 C-9a 12' Ta i Sleeve 1 Each 1,000.00 1,000 C-10 12' MJ BF Valve 1 Each 750.00 750 3 Each 800.00 2.400 C10a 8' FL x MJ Gate Valve 4 Each 550.00 2,200 C-11 6' FL Gate Valve 1 Each 450.00 450 5 Each 450.00 2,250 C-12 Fire Hydrant 1 Each 1,800,00 I's 00 5 Each 1,800.00 9 000 C-13 Railroad Bore 160 Lineal Feet 220.00 35,200 Subtotal $20,614 $773,685 Contingencies (10%) 22.061 17.368 Total Schedule C $22,675 $191,053 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE WALL STREET Phase 1 (425 feet) and Phase 2 (2775 feet) March 1, 2004 Schedule D - Signing Striping & Illumination Improvements Phase 1 (425ft) Phase 212775ft) Item No. Description Quantity 425ft Unit Unit Price Total Quantity 2775ft Unit Unit Price Total D•1 Removal of Existing Pavement Markings All Lump Sum $500.00 5500 AN Lump Sum 500.00 $500 D-2 Pavement Legend, Type A: Arrows 4 Each 225.00 900 4 Each 225.00 900 D3 Pavement Legend, Type A: Bicycle Lane 2 Each 225.00 450 8 Each 225.00 1,800 Symbols D-4 Painted Permanent Pavement SB n 2,068 Lineal Feet 0.20 414 8,272 Lineal Feet 010 1,654 D-5 Remove and Reinstall Exds' Signs AN Lump Sum 500.00 500 All Lump Sum 500.00 500 D-6 Square Tube Sion Supports All Lump Sum 500.00 500 AN Lump Sum 500.00 500 D-7 Wood Sion Posts 6 Cubic Feet 100.00 600 24 Cubic Feet 100.00 2.400 D-8 Type 'G' Si ns in Place 6.7 Square Feet 20.00 134 26.8 Square Feet 20.00 536 0-9 Type 'R' Signs in Place 9 Square Feet 20.00 180 36 Square Feet 20.00 720 D-10 Type 'YI" Signs in Place 9.0 Square Feel 20.00 160 36 -Square Feet 20.00 720 D-11 Pole Foundations AN Lump Sum 3.500.00 3,500 AN Lump Sum 14 000.00 14.000 D-12 lJ hU Poles Fixed Base An Lump Sum 5,000.00 5. AN Lump Sum 20 000.00 20 000 D-13 Lighting Pole Anus AN Lump Sum 750.00 750 AN Lump Sum 3.000.00 3.0D0 D-14 Luminaires Lamps and Ballasts An Lump Sum 1,000.00 1.000 All Lump Sum 4.000.004.000 DAS Loo Detector installation (Complete) All Lump Sum 2.500.00 2, 0-16 Temporary Construction Area Signing All Lump Sum 1,000.00 1, An Lump Sum 1,000.00 1,000 D-17 Remove Railroad Crossing Signals AN Lump Sum 1,000.00 1,000 Al Hunziker Subtotal $18,108 $53,230 Contingencies (10%) 11811 5.323 Total Schedule D $19,919 $58,553 :e 00pow"100 00 ~GV►p►M11 i ~►r N COS? Eg'[iMAtE ® 00;;_7 y GoµSTRUC.0 .2r6feet) ® PREi VAINAR and phase 2 i 1 ~q25 feed WptL5tREEY Phase March 1, 2004 P e 2 2775tt Yotil onnptlce 2775 Unit 35000 se 1 425 pusntl ph tout 35000 500 roveme ~ntt Dnitp AA Wm Sum 50pU0 tytl ales tm pysntl 425tt S8a0 500 nound Al LUm9 Sum Schedule E -Undc 3sao ~ 200 500.Op LUni Sum mtJ pescri tlon 200 psi LUrti Sum 50 400 O. t~ no Lump Sum 200 00 at Feet t6 20 Mpbit'r2aliINr floe 40 00 3150 E 1 E 2 & Do ~ ~mK~rotec6on ~ ~ LUm Sum 15 ~ 5 700 50 L~eai Feet 7 429 7P 2. reG trot Di 30 $e~mentaGon Con L~l Feel 1,750 49 Dust acid Eroswd 360 35.00 L. e%Feet 1. E'3 lpandu0nUT19l 3150 Ovver 2000 cavalwn~a3 i8 Cm ete 50 Lw'alfeet 950 LW'ealFeet 100.00 rend'` ~sun9 2.50 653 2750 15600 E-4 ? a1an 6 Baclcfiu ter Llnea%Feet Each 390 1.80 ~ 20 E 5 Trench a Gom to Paved eAr s Fi1Ci S Lineal feet 6 Each 126% 380 100 3000 2.30 duit WISv~ E e 4- PYC Con s b Fittln S Each Lmeat Feet lWlSwee 5 3 ~ 4612 E 7 2' pVG Condo 1 Ead+ 2150 5500 1.75 2.50 LineatFeet S10joS 4 E 8 d-Boxes 2 750 PGE Sv'tchYaull Lltleal Feet 774 1.80 E.9 STelePhonel s 8 5116,425 Ve tq pYCConddill WiSwee s~FitU q30 LmeatFeet S16yT 668 E.10 Co CBS t2vPVG Conduit Gp tOta' Iles (t0"/°1 s18 3~5 E-11 total Schedu1e E 4ytiyrprrr r t ~ r ~ ES~MASE I tee O~a d Phase 2125 feed RE~yMINARY ~Q~g'LRUC~ • P +125 Wp4` SEES Phase 1 l Match i, 2004 Pha Tata1 UnnP~a 4T50 ~nh e1 425[t ~anU 27T5 54T~~ 26 phas Total Lum 2T5~ pa g5 400 t)nltPtlce 57200 E~ 4.00 Unh 04 9.750 In m to~em n QuanU 42511 51200.00 >>2T5 Fit 9T5 Schedule F .1.a 1,um Sum 27500 16 'i Ar tz pesetl tlon Sgd+ 400 i09T25 Item NO. 41 t 6X5075 p 1 g 150 S oats Fee 2y F2 SlteetS \td aUOn Subtotal lio-hl 527,583 Fa Plan edule B Total Sch PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE WALL STREET Phase 1 (425 feet) and Phase 2 (2775 feet) March 1, 2004 Schedule G - Buffer Mitigation and Stream Restoration Improvements Phase 1 (425ft) phase 2127751t) Item No. Description Quantity 42511 Unit Unit Price Total Quan 277511 Unit Unit Price Total G-1 Mobilization AD Lump Sum $7,000.00 $7, AN Lump Sum $1000.00 $1000 G-2 TP & DT (Traffic Protection and Ali Lump Sum 1,500.00 1,500 AN Lump Sum 100.00 100 Direction of Traffic v G-3 Dust and Erosion/Sedimentation Control An Lump Sum 2,000.00 2.000 An Lump Sum 200.00 200 G-3a Clear Evasive Species AD Lump Sum 700.00 700 -C-4 Clearing and Grubbing All Lump Sum B.D00.00 8. G-5 Excavation All Lump Sum 7,525.00 7,52 G-6 36' CMP (Complete) 93 Lineal Feet 70.00 6,510 G-7 Riprap and Fishrock 42 Square Yards 20.00 840 G-8 Weirs 31 Each 700.00 21700 G-9 Soil Amendment and Preparation An Lump Sum 900.00 900 G-10 Tem a Irrigation An Lump Sum 28,000.00 28.000 G-tOa Plantings, Temporary Irrigation and Evasive Species Control G-11 Invasive Species Control An Lump Sum 16 000.00 16, G-12 Seeding able 3 1.01 Acres 6.900.00 6.970 C- 13 Seedin able 4 1.33 Acres 7 ,20000 9,575 G-14 Slough Sedge 275 Each 0.45 124 G-15 Small - Fruited Bulruch 275 Each 0 45 124 G-16 Sword Fern 50 Each 7.00 350 G-17 Vine Ma le 25 Each 7.00 175 G-18 Bi Leaf Ma le 86 Each 14.00 1,2 04 G-19 Saskatoon Serviceberry_ 396 Each 7.00 2,7721 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE WALL STREET Phase 1 (425 feet) and Phase 2 (2775 feet) March 1, 2004 Schedule G - Buffer Mitigation and Stream Restoration Improvements Phase 1 (42511) Phase 212775111 Item No. Description Quantity 425ft unit Unit Price Total Guantity 2775n Unit Unit Price Total G-20 Tall Oregon Grape Clusters of 3 1,125 Clusters $7.00 S7 875 G-21 Red-Osier Dogwood 100 Each 7.00 700 G-22 Black Hawthorn 25 Each 7.00 175 G-23 0 on Ash 55 Each 14.00 770 G•24 Indian Plum 396 Each 7.00 2.77 2 G•25 Pacific Ninebark 24 Each 7.00 168 G-28 Douglas Fir 86 Each 14.00 1.204 G•27 0 on While Oak 86 Each 21.00 1,806 G-28 Cascara 320 Each $7.00 2.24 0 G-29 Wild Clustered Rose 48 Each 7.00 336 G-30 Pacific Willow 5o Each 7.00 350 G•31 Pi s Willow 100 Each 7.00 700 G-32 Scouler Willow 30 Each 7.00 210 G-33 Snowberry Clusters of 3 1,125 Clusters 7.00 7,875 G-34 Western Red Cedar 16 Each 14.00 224 Subtotal $148,674 $20,100 Contingencies (10%) 14.867 22.010 Total Schedule G $163,541 $22,110 ou on so 10 so so go so COST S:STt~`m ® MINARY Cot STRUCTlOt3 and Phase 2121,5 "at' PRS► WAIL S,~¢EEf Phase 1(425 tNt1 March A. 2004 Pha 2 2T7 Tota► Untt PAca p as 4251, puantl Znr, Udt tool UnitPtlce St50000 ► nta ton Un t , m n 5tt unit puanti 42 lum SOO 00 30 gch ute K - ali 000 Sum ~ 00 peacrl lio As n 30 item No. LSum $160 lsolo S. naffs l ~A H t intenwnn Conti gencies lt0'Al 41.2 5198, total Schedule H PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE WALL STREET Phase 1 (425 feet) and Phase 2 (2775 feet) March 1, 2004 Schedule I - Sanitary Sewer Improvements Phase 1 (425ft) Phase 21277511) Item No. Description Quantity 425tt. Unit Unit Price Total Otuan 2775 Unit Unit Price Total General 1-1 Mobilization AN Lump Sum $3,330.00 $3.330 1.2 TP & DT (Traffic Protection and AN Lump Sum 70000 700 Direction of Traffic) 1.3 Dust and ErosiorvSedimentation Control AN Lump Sum 2,100.00 2,100 1.4 Clearing and Grubbing AN Lump Sum 1,400.00 1,400 1.$ Trench Foundation 10 Lineal Feet 5.00 50 1-6 10' PVC Pipe 880 Lineal Feet 9.00 6,120 1.7 Trench Excavation (Common and 580 Lineal Feet 25.00 14,500 Class A Backlill) I.g Trench Excavation (Common and 100 Lineal Feet 15.00 1,500 Class B Bacldill) 1.9 t0• Plugs 2 Each 20.00 40 1.10 Connect to Existing Manhole 1 Each 900.00 900 1.11 48' Standard Manhole 2 Each 3,000.00 3,000 Subtotal $36,640 Contingencies 1110%) 3.664 Total Schedule 1 $40,304 e.a.varta.e a a a e err ~.v~..~ MINARY CONSTRUC71ON COSY ~TI", PREt-1 teeq WALL STREET Phase 1 (425 feet) and Phase 2 (2~ March 1, 2004 P a 2 V Total Phasel L425 Unit UnltPrice Quantl 2775 y100,000 V m Unit Unit Price Total AS Lump Swn 44.000.00 Railroad Cr s In lm Schedule J - puanu 4251 6400,000 Item No. Descrt uon p00 Railroad Cresstng Signals l2 Sets) J.t $440000 yJ,thpanels subtotal t0'h1 Contingencies Total Schedule J solo COSS EStiMAtE ® go to so 7RUCT1ON (NARY C0145 PREI ~M t1 and Phase 212n5 W ALI. SjREt t Phase 11425 tee March 1, 2004 Pae Tout Unit Prtu unit $1051 Ohs e j 42 tout CtwnU 2n5 1051500.00 L Sinn Unit Price pl 51,051,500 . Brl c e r v¢m n QU~nU Unit 1.x150 lm 4258 Sched ► Uon 51,156,650 Item No. p8scrt B e Gom eke 1 t10'~1 K 1 Conttlgentles total Schedule K mono as a® a a a a a a a®® a® a PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE WALL STREET Phase 1 (425 feet) and Phase 2 (2775 feet) March 1, 2004 Summary Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Schedule A (Street Improvements) $194,493 $730,364 $924,857 Schedule B (Storm Drain Improvements) 21,510 312,521 334,031 Schedule C (Water Improvements) 22,675 191,053 213,728 Schedule D (Signing, Striping & Illumination) 19,919 58,553 78,472 Schedule E (Underground Utilities) 18,335 116,425 134,760 Schedule F (Landscaping) 27,583 109,725 137,308 Schedule G (Buffer Mitigation) 163,541 22,110 185,651 Schedule H (Signalization) 198,000 198,000 Schedule I (Sanitary Sewer) 40,304 40,304 Schedule J (Railroad Crossing) 440,000 440,000 Schedule K (Bridge) 1,156,650 1,156,650 Total Construction Cost Estimate. $666,056 $3,177,705 $3,843,761 i Wall Street LID i Proposed Assessments March 1, 2004 i 1 Net a b 25% b Assessment Total Ident. Assessment Assessment Area Assessment i No. Tax Lot No. Area OFP Area IFP a+ 25%b 1 100 71,034 39,042 9,761 80,795 132,252 i 2 200 50,733 60,415 15,104 65,837 107,768 3a 300a 119,451 0 0 119,451 195,528 3b 300b 16,988 110,752 27,688 44,676 73,13 4 1200 792,602 297,722 74,431 867,033 1,419,239 5 1100 547,894 0 0 547,894 896,843 5 S.S. 1100 547,894 0 0 547,894 17,163 i 6 800 996,019 0 0 996,019 1,630,375 6S.S. 800 996,019 0 0 996,019 31,202 7 1202 426,017 0 0 426,017 697,343 8 1201 250,835 0 0 250,835 410,590 9 600 85,495 99,941 24,985 110,480 180,844 10 690 0 8,712 2,178 2,178 3,565 $5,795,842 OFP = Outside Flood Plain IFP = Inside Flood Plain i 1 1 ' Assessment Formulas I i Sanitary Sewer Extension (S.S.) $48,365 _ i 1,543,913ftz - $0.03133/ft2 All Other Assessable Costs $5,747,477 _ 3,511,215ft2 - $1.63689/ft2 WALL STREET LID PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL (and Ownership Report) March 1, 2004 Ident. Tax Lot No. Owner Assessed Outstanding Bonding Preliminary Bonding No. Valuation Assessment Capacity Assessment Deficiency ' 100 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd. $326,980 $0.00 326,980 $132,252 $0.00 ' 2S 1 2DD Tigard, OR 97223 200 City of Tigard 2 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 384,860 0 384,860 107,768 0 2S 1 2DD Tigard, OR 97223 300a Denell D. Zander & 3a Carol M. Est. 550,945 0 550,945 195,528 0 13700 SW Hall Blvd. 2S 1 2DD Tigard, OR 97223 300b City of Tigard 13125 3b SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR Est. 194,545 0 194,545 73,130 0 2S 121313 7223 1200 Fred W. Fields 4 1 149 SW Davenport 1,486,360 0 1,486,360 1,419,239 0 ' 2S 1 I Portland, OR 97201 1100 Fred W. Fields 5 1 149 SW Davenport 2,192,930 0 2,192,930 914,006 0 2S 1 I Portland, OR 97201 800 Fred W. Fields 6 1149 SW Davenport 3,980,810 0 3.980,810 1,661,577 0 2S 1 1 Portland, OR 97201 1202 The Coe Manufacturing Co. 7 P.O. Box 520 4,889,530 0 4,889,530 697,343 0 2S I 1 Painesville, OH 44077 1201 The Coe Manufacturing Co. 8 P.O. Box 520 2,890,040 0 2,890,040 410,590 0 2S 1 1 Painesville, OH 44077 600 City of Tigard 9 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Est. 317,000 0 Est. 317,000 180,844 0 2S 1 2DA Tigard, OR 97223 690 A. Eidrem 10 PO Box 82824 5,400 0 5,400 3,565 0 ' 2S 12DA Portland, OR 97282 Total Amount to be Assessed $5,795,842 Bonding Capacity = Assessed Valuation Less Outstanding Assessments ~ III ATTA~KMENTS t 1 t DIKS Associates _ 1400 SW Avenue, Suite 500 Portland, OR 97201 Phone (503) 243-3500 Fax (503) 243- 1934 MEMORANDUM TO: Gus Duenas, City of Tigard l auric Nicholson, City of Tigard FROM: R S. McCourt, I'.E. DATE: September 6, 2000 SUBJECT: Tigard TSP - Linkages between Hall, Hunziker and Dartmouth N9161 Several circulation alternatives were tested in the area between downtown Tigard and the Tigard Triangle. This memo summarizes the findings of analyzing these alternatives and the basis for the recommendations that are found in the draft Tigard Transportation System Plan. A general description is provided for each of the alternatives, outlining performance ' Today the downtown area of Tigard and the Tigard Triangle are linked together via two overcrossings of ORE 217 (ORE 99W and 72 Aventre/Hunziker). Because of the lack of connections between the Tigard Triangle and downtown Tigard, local circulation is constrained since local circulation must utilize the same routes that access regional routes (ORE 217 and ORE 99W). ORE 99W is by far the most direct route; however it is heavily traveled with extensive pcaY queuing, serving regional traffic. Lack of capacity along ORE 99W is a key issue. ?2"d Avenue is less traveled but is somewhat out of direction to reach downtown and can become congested near ORE 217. Because of these issues, one alternative that has arisen over the past ten years is an additional overcrossing of ORE 217 between ORE 99W and 72nd Avenue. It is one of several altemmVICs that were tested to addrass roadway capacity needs in this area. There were five basic alternatives considered (Figure 1) - A) new overcrossing of ORE 217; B) new overcrossing with access to ORE 217; C) widen existing roadways; D) new overcrossing between Hunziker and Hampton; and E) local linkages north and south of ORE 217 (Hunziker to Hall, Atlanta extension). Each of the general concepts were tested utilizing the regional travel demand forecasting model to evaluate the level of traffic that would be attracted to the new route(s). The benefit of each alternative in reducing traffic on key routes which are over or near capacity in the future was determined. Generally, as a rule of thumb, overcrossings need to carry 10,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day and roadway connections about 4,000 to 8,000 vehicles per day to produce adequate benefits to justify their consideration. Table I summarizes the first screening of the options L.GW1e7116J T 01 Mir DKS Associates To NOT VALE CITY OF TIGARD Transportation Systems Plan 217 PFAFFLE ST i Legend i i i OPT10N ~T BST HAINES ST \J -NewRoxwpwn0"mwgng ~(J (61% - N. InlerCiarge Q © •RoaQ~ayY(denea Rr o DO.NewO+ervossag 99w m ~ O • New Roaary 11Y'~~ c % j ~ ` • Nur,bet 01 Lanes to Wden I 5 y B © We So i P UN?i,~F~ f " I Reran SSnal i P~ D r HAMPTON ~ PSG ST Q , i j r r • j Figure 1 EAST TIGARD CIRCULATION OPTIONS MEMORANDUM 1 September 5, 2000 Page 2 of 7 Table I - Summar of Initial Scr-ceninL, of Circulation O ptions Option Description _ Issues _ A New overcrossing of ORE 217 from The potential alignment between tltc ('ostco t Dartmouth to Ilunziker and shopping area to the cast is not incorporated in any plans. The area between the two sites is a wetland and would require the alignment to impact one of the sites. If Screening Outcome: Significant one of the existing property driveways is not ' impacts are a major issue, resulting used for the alignment, then inadequate access in expensive project - consider spacing would result on Dartmouth. South of circulation benefits to determine if ORE- 217 would require the acquisition of one benefits exceed significant cost parcel and building before intersecting with Hunziker. Because the alignment that reduces impacts to adjacent properties is almost entirely in wetland area - only two options exist: 1) expensive bridged structure for the entire length - nearly 2,300 feet; or 2) significant impact to ROW of adjacent -property (very expensive) B New overcrossing of ORE 217 with The space between the ORE 99W and 72 new freeway access Avenue interchanges is 1,200 to 1,500 feet. The ODOT standard for urban freeways is 3 miles (15,000 feet). A new interchange between ORE 99W and 72nd Avenue would Screening Outcome: Drop this have only a few hundred feet between specific option from further adjacent interchanges, requiring braided consideration due to the resulting ramps (a total of four at a cost of about $15 severe impact to public safety or million each) to mitigate the unsafe spacing unreasonable cost Preserve the created by the new overcrossing. With costs option for an HOV only ramp in well over $50 million, this alternative would the future - beyond 20 year not be considered feasible. It may be possible planning horizon. to use the new ramps only for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) access to ORE 217 if HOV lanes provided on ORE 217 i C Widen existing roadways While right-of-way acquisition would be significant along ORE 99W for seven lanes, i Screening Outcome: Consider ROW on 72"d Avenue could be dedicated further. with development over time. Business impacts would be significant on ORE 99W. No major environmental issues with widenin s. MEMORANDUM 1 Scptcmbcr 5. 2000 Pagc 3 of 7 'T'able I Summar of Initial Screening of Circulation O tions o D New overcrossing of ORE 217 1) This improvement was originally between Hunziker and I lampton considered in the ORE 217 upgrading in 1989. The linkage has minor ROW impacts compared to other options Screening Outcome: Consider (mostly in ODOT ROW). No major further. environmental issues. Because of the short spacing between Hampton and ORE 217 northbound off-ramp - this option would likely require relocation of the northbound ORE 217 ramps from 72nd Avenue to 68`h'Parkway. This would result in only two traffic signals where four are present today on 72nd Avenue, improving operation. The 68'h ramp would have ROW impacts (through a parking lot) and a drainage crossing. This link will require ROW to be acquired on the old Lewis Elementary school site. 1 Other than the overcrossing itself, there are few impacts of this linkage. The eastern most part of Hunziker would be converted to a cul-de-sac. • E Local Circulation improvements: I) Wall Street is a local industrial roadway 1) Hunziker to Hail link via Wall St. between Hunziker and the railroad tracks. Extending Wall Street south toward Hall will require crossing of the railroad tracks (new crossings are difficult to obtain) and wetland areas of Fanno Creek. Few alignments between Hunziker and Hall can be developed without significant impacts. The exception is an alignment utilizing the existing Wall Street extending to the intersection of HaIVO'Mara. This alignment has the least impacts and provides adequate spacing between existing intersections. Alignments to the south or north would have greater impact in the wetland areas. It also has the least impact on properties n the area, aligning with property lines. 1 MEMORANDUM Scplcmbc( 5, 2000 Pagc 4 of 7 "fable I Suntrr►ar of Initial Screening Circulation Options 2)Atlanta extension to Dartmouth 2) This link crosses a sensitive area cast of 72nd Avenue Because the land between 72"d and Dartmouth is developed, any roadway would impact sites, would require some acquisition and/or impact Screening Outcome: Consider adjacent wetland areas. The recent further Babys-R-Its site provides an example of the difficulty The intersection on Dartmouth would also be an issue since the Costco driveway would be about the only possible location that would be safe for access due to spacing constraints. TESTING OF PERFORMANCE Each of the concepts were tested to determine the forecasted motor vehicle volume and the volume reduction on key congested routes. The overcrossing of ORE 217 (Option A) attracts less than 5,000 vehicles per day by itself Because it cannot mitigate the problems at 72nd/Hampton and ORE 217 - the Hunzikcr to Hampton crossing is also needed. The ORL' 217 overcrossing between Dartmouth and Hunzikcr has little benefit on 72nd Avenue and ORE 99W (only about 1,500 vehicles per day reduction each) and virtually no reduction elsewhere. It adds about 2000 vehicles a day to the Wall Street link between Hunzikcr and Hall. Most of the traffic benefits of the overcrossing are produced with the Hunziker to Hampton overcrossing and the Dartmouth to Hunziker overcrossing has limited additional benefit. Unfortunately, ORE 99W still requires mitigation with or without the overcrossing. Because of the low beneficial impact to ORE 99W and 72"d Avenue, this option was rejected. One option where this overcrossing may be desirable in the future would be where ramp metering is fully operational and A improvements to ORE 217 include a High Occupancy Toll (HOT) or High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane alternative where direct connections to ORE 99W are desired. The Dartmouth to Hunziker overcrossing couid provide access to the Tigard Triangle and ORE 99W area via drop in ramps. Therefore, a potential alignment should he preserved for future consideration (where Y the alignment would go through parking lots). However, the overcrossing is not part of the street A improvement plan for the next 20 years in the TSP s~ J Option C of widening ORE 99W (seven lanes) and 72"d Avenue (five lanes) are necessary in the Tigard Triangle area to preserve adequate capacity in the future. Between 1-5 and ORE 217, the j widening of Pacific Highway (ORE 99W) is the only option that produces adequate intersection J level of service. There are no parallel routes or alternatives that address the capacity needs on this segment. On 72nd Avenue, development in the Tigard Triangle creates significant future demand that cannot be addressed by a three lane roadway. In the future the segment between Dartmouth and ORE 217, extending south to Durham Road is over capacity without additional ME= MEMORANDUM Scplcmbcr 5, 2000 Pagc 5 of 7 capacity (this is even more the case if the 1-5 improvements identified in the TSP arc not completed). Because of the capacity deficiencies, these improvements are necessary to meet future needs in the Tigard Triangle area. A sensitivity test was conducted on both ORE 99W and 72nd Avenue without widening and with the overcrossing of ORE 217 between Dartmouth and Hunziker. The outcome was somewhat less traffic on both routes, but not enough of a reduction to alleviate the need for widening of ORE 99W and 72nd Avenue to relieve capacity deficiency on either route. Based upon these findings, the widening of ORE 99W and 72"d Avenue were recommended in the TSP. Option D includes the Hunziker to Hampton overcrossing of ORE 217. This overcrossing caries over 14,000 vehicles per day and combined with Option C improvements produces adequate level of service performance in the future. This improves circulation and capacity, while carrying nearly three times more traffic than the overcrossing between Dartmouth and Hunziker over ORE 217. The realignment of Hunzikcr to Hampton at 72"d is may be required to resolve the tight spacing of four traffic signals in the vicinity of ORE 217 which would be nearly non-functional due to queuing with a five lane 72nd Avenue. The Dartmouth to Hunziker overcrossing was tested various ways (linking to Hunziker, to Hall, to Walnut, to Bonita) and in no case was the volume of the Dartmouth/Hunziker overcrossing ever greater than that forecast for the Hampton/Hunziker overcrossing. Based upon these findings, the Hampton/Hunziker overcrossing was a recommended improvement in the TSP. Option E tested the performance of a few local circulation improvements in the east Tigard area - Atlanta Street extension and Wall Street extension. By extending Atlanta Street from Haines Street to 72"d Avenue and further south to Dartmouth Street, a new link into the center of the Tigard Triangle could be created linking to the I-5 northbound ramps at Haines. This link was tested with and without the Dartmouth to Hunziker overcrossing of ORE 217 and with and without the segment between 72"d and Dartmouth as well as with and without widening of ORE 99W and 72"d Avenue. The outcome of all the various tests indicates that the segment with the highest use was the linkage between 68`i'/Haines and 72nd Avenue (over 12,000 vehicles per day (vpd) in the future). This segment eliminates the future need to widen Dartmouth Street east of 72"d Avenue. Without the Atlanta Street extension to 72"d Avenue, Dartmouth would need to be widened to five lanes. The segment between 72nd Avenue and Dartmouth also carried significant traffic in the future (less than 10,000 vpd) if ORE 99W and 72"d are not widened. However, this segment does not relieve the need to add capacity on ORE 99W or Dartmouth and with ORE 99W and 72nd widened it only carries 2,000 vpd (as compared to the segment to the east that carries 12,000 vpd whether or not widenings occur). Because of these findings and the complexities of the alignment (wetlands and developed lands) the segment between 72nd and Darthmouth was not recommended in TSP. The segment between 68'h and 72"d was recommended in the TSP and additionally, it was recommended that parking lot connections/common access or a local/private street be developed through the redevelopment/ land use approval process as a backage connection to ORE 99W between Dartmouth and 72nd instead. 1 MEMORANDUM September 5, 2000 Pagc 6 of 7 The Wall Street extension was also tested under various scenarios (with and without Dartrnoutlr/flunziker overcrossing and with and without ORE 99W and 72nd widening). 'llic future forecast on the Wall Street was also tested under various alignments. The most northern alignment carried greater traffic (8,000 to 10,000 vpd in the future) but removed most of the traffic from the Walnut-to-Ash-to-Scoffins-to-llrrnziker link that had adequate capacity. The southern ainghnment linking to Bonita/79'" carried the least traffic (3,000 to 7,000 vpd) and the central alignment (linking to O'Mara) would carry about 5,000 to 7,000 vpd. All three linkages reduced the level of traffic at two key intersections (liall/Hunziker and 72"d/Bonita). This reduction produces adequate capacity at each of this locations which otherwise could not be mitigated without further roadway widening (hall five lanes). Because of this and the fact that the central alignment produces all the benefits with the least environmental impacts, the central alignment was recommended in the TSP. The specific alignment of the Wall Street extension involves four specific issues to be addressed First, the alignment tested utilized the existing Wall Street south of liunziker and then follows between property lines east of Hall and O'Mara. A small triangular shaped parcel of Metro open space property would be divided by this alignment. This specific alignment was recommended since it produces safe access spacing on Hall Boulevard that could not be obtained without going south to McDonald or the City Hall driveway (which would both have much more significant wetland and property impacts) Second, the crossing of the railroad would represent a new crossing (as would the Walnut/Ash crossing recommended in the TSP further to the west). These connections provide necessary capacity and cast-west connectivity which is lacking in Tigard. Without the railroad crossing, additional traffic would be forced to ORE 99W, flail Boulevard and 72"d Avenue where capacity is not available (resulting in further widening of these facilities). Each of these crossings could be controlled by automatic gates. While the railroad generally opposes additional crossings (due to greater exposure), the public facilities and safety of Tigard's motor vehicle system is enhanced significantly by these additional crossings. The City may work with the railroad regarding other crossings in the city that can be closed in exchange for the new crossings (Dakota Street). The volume of traffic in the future on these crossings would not warrant grade separation (particularly the downtown crossing at Ash - where 'here would not be room for grades to get over the railroad). The future volumes of traffic on these crossings (12,000 vpd for Walnut/Ash and 5,000 vpd for Wall Street) could safely be designed with gates and medians, not requiring overcrossings The highest volume crossing of the railroad in the area would be flail Boulevard (which is an at-grade crossing - if any route required grade separation - liall would be the first A under consideration) I The third issue would be the eventual treatment of O'Mara Street Because of their neighborhood status, both O'Mara Street and Edgewood Street would need to have neighborhood traffic management measures installed to minimize the potential for cut-through traffic created by the Wall Street extension MEMORANDUM Scptcmbcr 5. 2000 Pagc 7 of 7 Finally, the size of the roadway and right-of-way would need to be minirnized due the sensitive 1 nature of the wetlands. The TSP recommends for a three lane collector 74 feet and for a two lane collector 60 feet. The TSP also provides a table to consider smaller right-of-way in areas where constraints exist (similar to this case). At the intersections of Hall Boulevard and Hunziker r, Street, Wall Street would be three lanes wide (with left turning lane). Due to the modest forecasted traffic, a two lane road would be adequate in-between (with properly spaced access points 300 feet or more apart). In the two lane segment, the actual roadway could be as small as 32 feet in between the intersections (two I 1 foot lanes and two 5 foot bicycle lanes) with curb- tight five foot sidewalks or about 44 feet of right-of-way. As the roadway approaches Hall and ' Hunziker the right-of-way would widen out to 64 feet with three 11 foot lanes, two 5 foot bicycle lanes, two 5 foot sidewalks and two 5 foot landscape strips (plus two 6 inch curbs). Figure 2 summarizes the Wall Street alignment and right-of-way. 1 Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Julie Sosnovske. X.VROJECTS11 WP99161 (Tigard TSP)Wall•Hunziker Memo.doc 1 s . L.L~71DIL11 T g 1 K!C f ClT7 of -nGARD DKS associates Transportation (2) Systems Plan ! gat 217 sos~ I S L= 1 ( Cho Rt*WO F'W \ ~ s 64 FamoGeeVN°~ k°as pOW o ~ u"„11~"~ . 1` ~ h~ tiluuss~ I F-El V ROW ma Figure 2 O WALL STREET ALIGNMENT AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF January 22, 2002 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Preliminary Evaluation of the Proposed Wall Street Local Improvement District PREPARED BY: A.P. Duenas DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall City Council proceed with the process to form a Local Improvement District (LID) for design and construction of the Wall Street Extension from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council direct staff to continue with the next step in the LID formation process in accordance with the recommendations of the Preliminary Evaluation Report. INFORMATION SUMMARY One of two new key alternate routes identified in Tigard's recently adopted Transportation System Plan (TSP) is the extension of Wall Street from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard. This connection is projected to carry about 5,000 to 7,000 vehicles per day and relieves Hall Boulevard sufficiently to allow that street to function adequately at 3 instead of 5 lanes. This proposed street would allow northbound traffic from south Tigard to bypass Hall Boulevard and proceed directly to Hunziker Street, then north to the Tigard Triangle. One major property owner along the proposed corridor for the Wall Street Extension is interested in forming an LID for construction of the street connection. An Option Agreement executed to purchase property owned by land owner for a proposed New Tigard Library requires the City to pursue formation of an LID for construction of this street. This street would provide access to property which the landowner currently owns and which has 1 no access to either Hall Boulevard or Hunziker Street. The attached Preliminary Evaluation Report reviews the feasibility of the LID and makes recommendations for City Council to consider. The findings of the Preliminary Evaluation Report are as follows: The proposed LID appears feasible despite the numerous major issues that must be resolved. These key issues t are listed as follows: Removal of the existing spur track adjacent to the existing access road i o • Crossing of two main railroad tracks (requires approval by Portland & Western and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) • Obtaining all applicable permits for crossing of Fanno Creek, the flood plain, and adjacent wetlands between the railroad tracks and Hall Boulevard. • Acquisition of property for the road improvements 1 • Approval from ODOT for the intersection location and improvements at the Wall Street/Hall Boulevard intersection The alignment shown as Alternative 2 in Exhibit B-2 of the report is the recommended alignment at this point. However, that alignment may shift south on Hall Boulevard if circumstances prove favorable to doing so. The final alignment will be established during the design phase of the project. The recommendations are as follows: • That Council direct staff to proceed with the preparation and submittal of the resolution authorizing preparation of the preliminary engineering report, together with any special instructions that should be included in the resolution • That Council direct the establishment of the funding mechanism for preparation of the report designating the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Fund as the funding source OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY ' The improvements proposed by this LID meets the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow goal of Improve Traffic Flow by creating an alternative route that bypasses the flalVHunziker/Scoffins signals and allows traffic to move directly to Hunziker Street from Hall Boulevard south of City Hall. ATTACHMENT LIST Preliminary Evaluation Report for the Proposed Wall Street LID FISCAL NOTES There are no funds currently allocated for the Preliminary Engineer's Report. The appropriate funding source for preparation of this report is the TIF Fund. If Council agrees with the recommendation to use TIF funds, the resolution directing the preparation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report will include Council direction to establish the funding mechanism using the TIF as the funding source. The initial amount needed to continue the process is approximately $325,000. JACitywiddSum/Preliminary Evaluation of Wall Street LID.doc Preliminary Evaluation Report Formation of a Local Improvement District for the Wall Street Extension in the City of Tigard 1 ® BACKGROUND ■ The Wall Street Extension The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) does not have the funding or the intention to address improvements in capacity to Highway 99W or Hall Boulevard in the City of Tigard. For better circulation within the City, alternate routes to bypass Highway 99W and ' Hall Boulevard must be developed. One of two new key alternate routes identified in Tigard's recently adopted Transportation System Plan (TSP) is the extension of Wall Street from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard. This connection is projected to carry about 5,000 to 7,000 vehicles per day and would reduce the level of traffic at two key intersections (Hall/Hunziker and 72"dBonita Road). Based on traffic modeling conducted for the draft TSP, this new connector produces adequate capacity at those two intersections and relieves Hall Boulevard sufficiently to allow that street to function adequately at 3 instead of 5 lanes. This proposed street would allow northbound traffic from south Tigard to bypass Hall Boulevard and proceed directly to Hunziker Street, then north to the Tigard Triangle. A ' proposed future overcrossing of Highway 217 would allow traffic to connect directly from funziker to Hampton Street in the Tigard Triangle. Mr. Fred Fields is the owner of several parcels of property through which the proposed street could be constructed. In an Option Agreement (attached as Exhibit A) dated December 18, 2001 for purchase of property needed for a proposed new Tigard Library, the City agreed to consult and reasonably cooperate with Mr. Fields regarding establishment of a road to provide that connection from Hall Boulevard to Hunziker Street, and to proceed with the formation of a local improvement district (LID) to finance construction of the road. In this e same Option Agreement, the City agreed to fund the costs of engineering and construction management for the construction of this road. The LID Process The LID process is outlined in Title 13, Chapter 13.04 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The LID Ordinance is in the process of being updated and with the proposed revisions scheduled for Council consideration on January 8, 2002. The proposed revisions to the LID ordinance j remove the requirement for a Preliminary Evaluation Report, substituting a staff report by the City Engineer for that portion of the process. However, the revisions to the LID ordinance will not take effect until at least 30 days after passage. Hence, the Preliminary Evaluation Report is still part of the process until superceded by the revised ordinance. The process is therefore as follows, assuming positive recommendations to Council and approval by Council to proceed to the next steps in the process: Preliminary Evaluation Report Proposed LID Formation for Wall Street January 10, 2002 Page 1 of 8 • Preparation of the Preliminary Evaluation Report (This Report) • Submittal of the report to City Council for discussion and direction • Council adopts a resolution directing staff to prepare the Preliminary Engineer's Report • Approval of the Preliminary Engineer's Report and Council direction to prepare an 1 ordinance forming the LID • Formation of the District by Ordinance • Preparation of final plans and specifications • Construction of the improvements • Determination and levying of assessments Current Situation The existing Wall Street between Hunziker Street and the existing railroad tracks is a paved two-lane road providing access to the buildings on the west side of road. There is an existing railroad spur track parallel to the access road, which runs from the main tracks to serve the properties north of Hunziker. 1 There is no existing road from the railroad tracks to Hall Boulevard. Between the tracks and Hall Boulevard are a flood plain, wetlands, and Fanno Creek. A road constructed to provide a connection from Hunziker Street would have to resolve the following issues: • Removal of the existing spur track adjacent to the existing access road + Crossing of two main railroad tracks • Crossing of Fanno Creek, the flood plain, and adjacent wetlands between the railroad tracks and Hall Boulevard. e Status of Land Use Applications A conditional use permit for a temporary use as a dog park on the undeveloped portion of Tax Lot ID# 2S 1010001202 may be issued in the future. The application has not yet been submitted, but would probably be submitted in the next few months. The use of this property as a dog park should not adversely affect the formation of the LID. Major Collector Street Requirements The City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards call for the following on Major Collectors: Required ROW: 60-80 feet (minimum) Pavement requirement: 44 feet curb to curb (minimum) Sidewalks: 6-foot sidewalks (minimum) Planter Strips: 1.5 feet (minimum) Street Trees: Street trees are required; must be on the approved street tree list Preliminary Evaluation Report Proposed LID Formation for Wall Street January 10, 2002 Page 2 of 8 There is no existing rights-of-way along the proposed corridor for the Wall Street Extension. The required rights-of-way would have to be acquired from the property owners for the project to be constructed. ASSUMPTIONS This report assumes that the proposed library site remains under the ownership of Mr. Fred Fields and includes the property as part of the LID. This is a worst case scenario because if the library bond issue does not pass and the LID formation proceeds, the properties in the proposed site would be included in the LID. In addition, no contributions from the library bond are included. Should the bond issue pass, the costs can be reduced accordingly. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED There are four alternatives considered to provide the connection from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard. All four alternatives include a common segment from the railroad tracks to Hunziker. They differ in alignment from the railroad tracks to Hall Boulevard. The alternatives are described as follows and are depicted in the attached drawings labeled Exhibits B-1 through B-4: • Alternative 1: Connect Wall Street to Hall Boulevard at O'Mara Street. This alternative works well for traffic circulation, but severely impacts the property as a future library site and creates a situation whereby traffic could increase along O'Mara to the detriment of the surrounding neighborhood. (See Exhibit B-1). The estimated cost for the project (excluding rights-of-way acquisition) is approximately $4.37 million. • Alternative 2: Connect Wall Street to flail Boulevard at the south end of Tax Lot ID# 2S102DD00200. This would include the 20-foot access easement immediately south of this tax lot. This alignment locates the intersection approximately 350 feet south of the Hall/O'Mara intersection. This is not the ideal alignment from the standpoint of intersection spacing and traffic circulation, but moves the street to the south end of the proposed library site and allows for construction of the library and site development as envisioned in the model prepared for the New Tigard Library. A 1 variation to this alternative would be to move the street up to 70 to 80 feet south of the access easement. This variation would require acquisition of rights-of-way from the lot adjacent to the library site, but would allow for better use of the library site for site development and parking. (See Exhibit B-2). The estimated cost for the project (excluding rights-of-way acquisition) is approximately $4.34 million. • Alternative 3: Connect Wall Street to Hall Boulevard at the south end of Tax ID# 2S I 02DD00300. This alignment is at the south end of property that is not owned by Mr. Fields. The owner of that property has placed the property for sale. This alignment would be ideal from the standpoint of intersection spacing because it places Wall Street approximately 650 feet from O'Mara Street to the north and the same distance from McDonald Street to the south. The disadvantages are that the property is not under the control of Mr. Fields and would require land acquisition from the adjacent property owner to accommodate the street construction. In addition, unless Preliminary Evaluation Report 1 Proposed LID Formation for Wall Street January 10, 2002 Page 3 of 8 the City purchases the entire parcel, development would most likely eventually occur north of the proposed road. This future development may or may not be compatible with the proposed library. Alternatives 3 and 4 are two slightly different variations of the same basic alignment. Alternative 3 begins the curve in the street earlier than Alternative 4 and leaves less of the parcel for development. (See Exhibit B-3). The estimated cost for the project (excluding rights-of-way acquisition) is approximately $4.52 million. • Alternative 4: Connect Wall Street to Hall Boulevard at the south end of Tax IDOL 2S 102DD00300. This alignment begins the curve towards the railroad tracks later than Alternative 3 and leaves slightly more land available for development north of the road. (See Exhibit B-4). The estimated cost for the project (excluding rights-of- way acquisition) is approximately $4.82 million. The costs for the first three alternatives are basically the same. Alternative 4 is the most expensive at approximately $300,000 more than any of the other alternatives. ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED Some of the major issues that need to be resolved for the successful implementation of the improvements in the proposed LID are: • Removal of the existing spur track adjacent to the existing access road • Crossing of two main railroad tracks (requires approval by Portland & Western and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) • Obtaining all applicable permits for crossing of Fanno Creek, the flood plain, and adjacent wetlands between the railroad tracks and Hall Boulevard. • Acquisition of property for the road improvements • Approval from ODOT for the intersection location and improvements at the Wall Street/Hall Boulevard intersection RECOMMENDED ALIGNMENT Alternative 2 appears to be the most suitable alignment for the proposed LID. It moves the street to the south end of the proposed new library site and allows development of the library as envisioned in the concept plan and model. Moving the street even further south into the property to the south of the proposed library site would maximize the development potential of the new library. An analysis should be performed to determine the cost of acquiring the additional property versus the expected benefits. This analysis should be part of the preliminary engineering report that fixes the final alignment for development of the plans for construction. ESTIMATED COSTS The following are the estimated costs for the Wall Street Extension using the alignment described in Alternative 2: Preliminary Evaluation Report Proposed LID Formation for Wall Strcet January 10, 2002 Page 4 of 8 Description Estimated Cost Wall Street Extension from Hunziker Street to the $1,150,000 railroad tracks (not including the railroad crossing). This is common to all four alternatives Wall Street from the railroad tracks (including the $3,190,000 crossing and related improvements) to Hall Boulevard Project Subtotal (Improvements only) $413401000 Land Acquisition costs for rights-of-way to allow $1,770,000 ' for construction of the improvements (70 feet in width plus intersection widenings at Hunziker and at Hall. Subtotal Land Acquisition Costs $1,770,000 Total Cost for the LID Project (not including interest $6,110,000 on the interim financing) Interest & related costs for Interim Financing (4.5% $940,000 assumed Total Cost for LID Improvements $7,050,000 COSTS FOR THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT PREPARATION A The total estimated project cost (excluding land acquisition and interest on the interim financing) is $4,340,000.00. The engineering and construction management costs should be approximately 15% of this, or approximately $650,000.00. The preliminary engineering report needs to include preparation of construction plans and specifications sufficient to provide a detailed cost estimate. Assuming the preliminary engineering report needs to provide plans and specifications up to at least 60% stage, the cost for the preliminary engineering report preparation should be established at approximately $325,000.00. Because this is a City-initiated LID, the City would have to finance the costs to prepare the Preliminary Engineering Report. EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED LID 1 Advantages Exhibit C shows the properties involved and the proposed district boundary based on implementation of Alternative 2, the recommended alignment for the new Wall Street Extension. The properties owned by Mr. Fields constitute slightly over 76% of the benefited Preliminary Evaluation Report Proposed LID Formation for Wall Street January 10, 2002 Page 5 of8 properties in the proposed LID. Exhibit D shows the following for each lot: the tax lot number, the owner, the size in square feet, and the percentage of each lot in relation to the aggregate total in square feet of all lots. In addition, it summarizes the lots by ownership and presents the percentages of the total for each owner. The TMC prohibits Council from proceeding with the formation of the district if the property owners owning two-thirds of the land area in the proposed LID remonstrate against the formation of the LID. In this case, successful formation of the LID is assured since landowners in only 24% of the land area can remonstrate against the LID formation. In addition, the owner of Tax Lot ID€t 2S1 02DD00300 has indicated a willingness to participate in the formation of an LID to build a road to which future development on that lot can connect. Mr. Fields has also stated that the new owners of COE Manufacturing have indicated no objections to the proposed LID. This does need to be verified, but if true, would guarantee successful formation of the LID. The willing participation of a major landowner with benefiting properties along the proposed route offers a rare opportunity for construction in the immediate future of a major connection ' that alleviates the traffic congestion at the Hal I/H unzi ker/Scoffins intersections. This opportunity may not come again, especially if the various parcels are sold resulting in multiple landowners along the proposed route. A Disadvantages The existing flood plain, wetlands and Fanno Creek are all obstacles to construction of the new roadway. Permits have to be obtained for the crossings and creek realignment, and wetlands mitigation will be required as part of this process. In addition, approval from Portland & Western and ODOT for new at-grade railroad crossings (two tracks must be crossed) may prove difficult to obtain. Finally, the Local Improvement District formed will have to acquire the rights-of-way needed for the roadway construction. This further adds to the cost of the total overall improvement costs. There is no funding currently available to continue the LID formation process. The most likely primary source of funding for the preliminary engineering report preparation, as well as the engineering and construction management costs, is the Traffic Impact Fee Fund. Because this is not an authorized project under the FY 2001-02 Capital Improvement Program, funding needs to be made available to proceed with the Preliminary Engineering Report initially, followed by engineering design and eventually construction management of the project. There is a risk that expenditures by the City in the formation process my not result in construction of the desired project. The issues to be resolved are serious and may not be resolved in a timely manner. In addition, there is always the possibility that the major land owner could withdraw support for the LID at any step in the process. Any costs incurred to 1 that point would be the City's responsibility. On the other hand, the importance of this connection does appear to warrant the effort to move forward towards eventual construction of the project. Preliminary Evaluation Report Proposed LID Formation for Wall Street January 10, 2002 Page 6 of 8 Feasibility of the LID The LID does appear feasible. However, the total costs are relatively high because of the railroad crossings, flood plain, wetlands and creek that lie in the proposed alignment. With land acquisition and interim financing costs factored in, the total LID cost is slightly over $7 million. The value of the properties owned by the owner representing approximately 76% of the benefited properties can be generally estimated at $10 million using a relatively low and conservative $3 per square foot as an average cost of the undeveloped property. It appears that the costs of the LID can be covered by the value of these properties. If the major property owner is still interested in proceeding with the LID (after seeing the anticipated costs involved), the City can continue with the next step in the process to formAt. + ` Possible Assessment Methods ' There are several ways that benefit to the property owners can be determined and assessment proportional to the benefits received can be established. These methods include street e frontage, total area owned, or a mixture of both. The actual method or methods of assessment should be developed and recommended to City Council as part of the preliminary engineering report. RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed LID appears feasible despite the numerous major issues that must be resolved. These key issues are reiterated as follows: • Removal of the existing spur track adjacent to the existing access road • Crossing of two main railroad tracks (requires approval by Portland & Western and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) • Obtaining all applicable permits for crossing of Farino Creek, the flood plain, and adjacent wetlands between the railroad tracks and Hall Boulevard. • Acquisition of property for the road improvements • Approval from ODOT for the intersection location and improvements at the Wall 1 Street/Hall Boulevard intersection The alignment shown as Alternative 2 in Exhibit B-2 is the recommended alignment at this point. However, that alignment may shift south on Hall Boulevard if circumstances prove favorable to doing so. The final alignment will be established during the design phase of the project. The recommendations are as follows: • That Council direct staff to proceed with the preparation and submittal of the t' resolution authorizing preparation of the Preliminary Engineer's-Report, together with any special instructions that should be included in the4esolution • That Council direct the establishment of the funding mechanism for preparation of the 0 report designating the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Fund as the funding source Preliminary Evaluation Report 1 Proposed LID Formation for Wall Street January 10, 2002 Page 7 of 8 t o 0 The appropriate funding source for the Preliminary Engineer's Report is the TIF Fund. However, before the TIF Fund can be designated as that source, the Wall Street Extension has to be added to the Countywide Traffic Impact Fee Base Report as an eligible collector f C facility. Council approved the Transportation System Plan (TSP) at the meeting on January 8, 2002. The ordinance approving the TSP becomes effective 30 days after that date. Both the addition of Wall Street to the Base Report and the request for use of TIF funds for the Preliminary Engineer's Report have to be approved by the Washington County Coordinating Committee (WCCC). The current practice is for its technical arm, the WCCC Transportation Advisory Committee, to review all such requests and make a recommendation to the WCCC. This could take two to three months, depending upon the meeting schedules for those two o bodies. If funding is needed while this process to get TIF funding approval for the project is still underway, internal borrowing from the General Fund in the interim could be authorized. WHAT'S NEXT After considering the Preliminary Evaluation Report, Council may direct staff to terminate work on the proposed district, or continue with the process by adopting a resolution directing staff to prepare a preliminary engineer's report. The resolution, to be prepared by staff for Council adoption, will include any specific instructions resulting from Council's discussion and decisions after reviewing the Preliminary Evaluation Report. It will also include direction from Council on the funding mechanism to be established for preparation of the report. The recommended funding source is the TIF Fund. The costs to prepare the report can be rolled into the overall LID costs. However, because the City has committed to funding the engineering and construction management costs, these costs will be deducted from the overall costs when the LID assessments are computed. The resolution, if directed by Council, would be prepared and submitted to Council at the next available business meeting. o The Preliminary Engineer's Report should include the scope of work, location of the proposed improvements, proposed district boundaries, estimated costs, and other information that may be relevant to the feasibility of the improvements and district. The report should recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial If, based on the Preliminary Engineer's Report, Council decides to proceed with the formation of the LID, Council needs to declare its intention to form the district and proceed with the district formation and construction of improvements in accordance with Chapter 13.04 of the TMC. Attachments: Exhibit A - Option Agreement for purchase of property for a New Tigard Library (Not Included) Exhibit B-1 to B-4 - Alternative alignments for the Wall Street Extension Exhibit C - Proposed district boundary with benefited properties shown Exhibit D - LID Ownership Percentage Analysis I:\Eng\Gus\Wall Street LID\Preliminary Evaluation Report for Wall Street LiD.doc Preliminary Evaluation Report Proposed LID Formation for Wall Street January 10, 2002 Page 8 of 8 1 /{i Street enslon \ spa ptternat've lbit 8-1 I III It 61. 1 . A•~'','',~ ~ 'f~,r~►M•~~ -gip m Iwo V~GiBiLITY STRIP logo. wenston Matt Street rr o, ; OIL- it ; • , ~-1,11. , ~ ~ I.• •r~•, °o vit fAl 13 1 „a•V. Wall Street' Extension • .gyp. ~1, , ! 96 ACRVS t~ `7tCARD Sir", f97D1 MCD M. 1_[J7 ACRES Awe At 1.140 AMES Alternative 3 INK _ ~yy I J ACRES vur r.aa~ Exhibit EAU SmIr PUSIch, am :t _ _ L•- E~~iLOjl i 25.61 ACRES 6.X A LEGIBILITY STRIP \I \ ` Wall,tmet Extension i Alternative 4 Ca MAKrAC (96 ACRES ~fti ~`~10ARD~ AL'TAO r11 i /RED r, STRJCr ~ 7137 ACRES IXLDI /RED M. u40 ACRES "M DS FRED W. M DJ B-4 c*0 - tl I ~.L'.C4 j AIFES J. 1 LMP=d 6& fRO I- i 14C'RESi ° . „ lfKt70rQAd+11d ` ~ Litt it REEDS FRED N. r~-a '~j 1. ' i{-~..r...r 2162 AWS LEGIBILFIY; ' r • . i~.: r of III ~ Eli in" ~ ~~~Lyy ~!Q t R~~Tl}f (((f S i I ICI 1111 / ,.,;._1 .Q! e a I l i l ~ I a w{.I I I I,I 'I I I I I I 11 it ! t III - s. '1FA jl 1 I i Is: III b 1 LID Ownership Percentage a Analysis Wall Street Extension LID Tax Lot Ownership A Taxlot ID Owner Area Sq ft Acres 2S1010001201 COE MANUFACTURING CO, THE 303,170.8 6.32 2S1010001202 COE MANUFACTURING COMPANY 448.877.9 9.78 2S1010001100 FIELDS, FRED W 583,516.6 13.21 e 2S1010000800 FIELDS, FRED W 1,017,969.0 24.37 2S1010001200 FIELDS, FRED W 1,116,072.0 26.32 2S102DDDO10o FIELDS, FRED W 145,096.3 3.37 2S102DD00200 FIELDS, FRED W 143,962.2 3.37 2S102DA00600 FIELDS, FRED W 351,382.2 8.03 2S102DD00300 ZANDER, DENELL D 263,051.8 6.16 e Summary By Porcontagos Owner Area Sq ft Percentage FIELDS, FRED W 3,357,998.2 76.8% COE MANUFACTURING CO, THE 752,048.7 17.2% ZANDER, DENELL D 263,051.8 6.0% Total Area (Square Feel) 4.373.098.7 100.0% Exhibit D 1 - a CITY OFTIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 02- / A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ENGINEERING STAFF TO PREPARE A PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED WALL STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND DIRECTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FUNDING MECHANISM FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE REPORT. WHEREAS, one of two new key alternate routes identified in Tigard's Transportation System Plan (TSP) is the extension of Wall Street from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard; and WHEREAS, this new route is projected to carry up to 7,000 vehicles per day and relieve Hall Boulevard sufficiently to allow that street to function adequately at 3 instead of 5 lanes; and WHEREAS, one major property owner along the proposed corridor for the road project is interested in O forming a Local Improvement District (LID) for construction of the new connector road; and WHEREAS, an Option Agreement executed to purchase property from this land owner for the proposed new Tigard Library requires the City to pursue fortnation of an LID for construction of the street; and WHEREAS, the City agreed in that Option Agreement to provide the funding for the engineering and 1 cnnctniction management of the LID improvements. and WHEREAS, the Engineering staff prepared a Preliminary Evaluation Rcport which was submitted to City Council for discussion and direction during the meeting on January 22, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Evaluation Report determined that the proposed LID appears feasible, despite various major issues that need resolution, and recommended that City Council take the next step in the LID formation process by authorizing the preparation of a Preliminary Engineer's Report; and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Evaluation Report recognized that there is no funding currently available to move ahead with the project and recommended that City Council direct the establishment of that funding mechanism designating the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Fund as the funding source; and WHEREAS, City Council discussed the proposed LID and indicated that the LID boundary and C improvements to be constructed by the LID are satisfactory as submitted; and 1 • WHEREAS, City Council has directed staff to prepare a resolution authorizing preparation of a Preliminary Engineer's Report and submit that resolution for adoption at the next Council business 1 meeting. 1 I I RESOLUTION NO.02- I Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: ' SECTION 1: The Engineering staff is directed to proceed with preparation of Preliminary Engineer's Report for the proposed LID in accordance with the proposed LID boundary and improvements as described in the Preliminary Evaluation Report. SECTION 2: The Preliminary Engineer's Report should include the scope of work, location of the pmpnsed improvements, proposed district boundaries, estimated costs, proposed ' assessment methods, and other information that may be relevant to the feasibility of the improvements and district. The report should recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial. ' SECTION 3: The City of Tigard shall provide the funding for preparation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report. The initial amount needed to prepare the report and continue with 1 the LID formation process is approximately $325,000. SECTION 4. The City staff is directed to establish the funding mechanism in that amount for the engineering work using the TIF as a funding source. Any budget adjustments requiring 1 Cnnncil action and necessary for the establishment of the project funding shall be brought to Council for appropriate action. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Resolution shall be cffective immediately. t~'1 PASSED: This ~a dayof-4,e.a , 2002. 1~yor - Cityo Tigard ATTEST: /A) hXVtAM City Recorder - City of Tigard l.%Citywidc\RaUtesolution Directing Prelindnary Engineer's Report for Wall Street LID RESOLUTION NO.02-JI Page 2 Conceptual Engineer' Report Excerpts from Council Minutes - March 11, 2003 7. REVIEW PROPOSED WALL STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT INITIAL REPORT City Engineer Gus Duenas presented the staff report, which Is on file In the City Recorder's ofilee. Marfln DeHaas reviewed the elements of the report submitted to the City Council. Highlights of the presentations to Council are on file in the City Recorder's office (PowerPoint presentation). The presentation and Council discussion included the following- 0 Review of the types of Improvement proposed through formadon of the local Improvement dWct. • Review of significant Issues Including wetland mitigation. • Plans for a bridge (prellminary drawing). • Estimated cost of almost $6 million. • What the next step In the study would be if Council authorized staff to proceed. • Key Issues that need to be resolved with the Oregon Department of Transportation, Portland & Western Railroad, and the property owners served by the spur track. Review of the manmade ponds on the property (water quality - what Is proposed). While not a public hearing, the following persons spoke to the Council about the subject local Improvement district; s i 3 1 i 1 1 Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - March 11, 2003 Page 5 e Paul Zalek, 650 Hawthorne Avenue, Salem Oregon representing Portland et Western Railroad gave some background Information about the railroad and the accumulation of assets through the years. He referred to the shared use agreement with Washington County for the future commuter rail. Mr. Zalek advised that, In general, the Railroad was opposed to new at-grade railroad crossings because of safety concerns and economics (such crossings are expensive to install and maintain). ' He noted In the area where the LID was being proposed, the Railroad uses this unimpeded 1.9 miles length of track for a railroad car switching area. Mr. Zalek also noted that economic value would be lost if the spur track was eliminated. ' The Railroad would seek functlonal compensation for any losses. Council members discussed Issues with Mr. Zalek Including what options the ' Railroad might consider if an at-grade crossing were granted and where a yard might be located for the switching of railroad cars. Mr. Zalek reiterated the Railroad's opposition as noted above. • Brian Wegener, Tualatin RJverkeepers, 16507 SW Roy Rogers Road, Sherwood, Oregon 97140, noted concerns about the Impact to the Fanno Creek Watershed. Mr. Wegener submitted a letter containing the highlights of his testimony, which is on file In the City Recorder's office. John Mangheill, 16415 SW 93rd, Tigard, Oregon submitted a letter written by Pat Whiting objecting to the taxpayer funds being used to further this project. A copy of Ms. Whiting's March 11, 2003, letter Is on file In the City Recorder's office. Mr. Manghelil also expressed objections to proceeding with the study of the local Improvement disWct. John Frewing, 71 10 SW Lola Lane, Tigard, Oregon, expressed concern about continued work on the engineering study. The highlights of Mr. Frewing's 1 comments are outlined In a March 1 1 communication to Mayor Griffith, which Is on file In the City Recorder's office. He referred to the sales contract for the property, which included a consideration that the City of Tigard pursue a Wall Street LID. He said he thought that the City of Tigard has adequately "pursued." Mr. FrelAng also registered concerns about the 100-year flood plain decetmination - whether recent upstream development had been taken into consideration. Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - March 11, 2003 Page 6 7~ • Sue Blelke, Director, The Blod(versity Project of Tigard, 11755 SW 1 14" Place, Tigard, Oregon, said she concurred with previous testimony and recommended that the City discontinue any more work on the preliminary engineer's report. She cited better alternatives for traffic congestion problems than extending Wall Street. She referred to concerns by her and others In Tigard about preserving the quality of life by providing more parks, greenspaces, and open spaces. She asked the Council to honor the visioning process. Ms. Blelke said the impacts of the library construction will be great In and of Itself and did not want the added 1 Impacts of the . She also said there Is a high failure rate of mitigation efforts. She said she and those she has talked to are willing to pay for parks. • Jeff Douglas, 8317 SW Char Court, Tigard, Oregon said no more dollars should be spent on this Issue. He said die LID was not a good solution to traffic problems; another at-grade railroad crossing was not needed. He referred to the ' hurdles that would need to be overcome to proceed with an LID including permitting and approvals from the Oregon Department of Transportation, Railroad, Corps of Engineers and others. He said the area near the new library should be used for pedesti laps and bicycles rather than a road. Councilor Wilson commented about the cholce between parks and movement of traffic. He cited the increased capacity potential to move 7,000 vehicles per clay. The proposal to wldcn Hall Boulevard has no Idendfled funding, while property owners would pay for the Wall Street Local Improvement District. • Fred Fields, 1149 SW Davenport, Portland, Oregon advised that he Is the owner of the property that would benefit from the Local Improvement District. He noted that the Wall Street route has been identified for about 35 or 44 years. He also noted that he has paid taxes on this property since 1957 and he would like to do something with the property that would benefit both himself and the City of Tigard. Mr. Fields sold the property to the City for the new library and if the LID Is blocked at this level he might consider nullifying the deal for the sale of the property. Mr. Fields said he doesn't agree with the Railroad's position as stated tonight and commented that additional cars will still need to find a way to cross the railroad tracks regardless of the location. He noted the railroad spur could be relocated. In response to a question from Mayor Griffith about whether Mr. Fields could access his property from Milton Court, Mr. Fields advised that he already has access to the property. City Attorney Ramis commented on die term "pursue" as it is referenced in the terms of sale for the property purchased by the City from Mr. Fields. "Pursue" Is not a legal term; it is used In the contract of sale to describe the good faith effort the City Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - March 1 1, 2003 Page 7 1 will undertake to form a Wall Street LID. Mr. Ramis suggested that the point at which It would be "safe" (meet the terms of the contract) to stop pursuit of the LID would be at the time It Is documented that a fatal flaw had been encountered. Council meeting recessed at 9:48 p.m. Council meeting reconvened at 9:56 p.m. Council comments followed: • Councilor Moore cited the track record of the Council's support for gneenspaces. He said that if a bond measure was proposed for greenspaces, he would support IL The Preliminary Engineer's Report (as noted in the City Engineer's staff report) is at the Conceptual Report stage, which 4 at 3596 of design plans for the LID. Councilor Moore recommended that the staff: proceed to the next level, which would be to complete 60% of the work needed for design plans. He said that this was owed to Mr. Fields to assure that "due diligence" had been performed In examining whether or not a Wall Street LID should be formed. Councilor Moore ' also noted that this property could have been developed at R-12. Councilor Wllson concurred with Councilor Moore to proceed with the Preliminary Engineer's report. He referenced another railroad crossing that had been identified In the Transportation System Plan. Councilor Sherwood thanked those who testified, but cautioned them that they cannot close the door behind them with regard to development of property in the area. She stated that it was Mr. Field's right as a property owner to pursue A improvements for his property. She said she was not In favor of continuing with more work on the Preliminary Engineer's Report. Councilor Dirksen said that It looks as if the LID has obstacles; however, It will not be known whether one or more of these obstacles is fatal until more work B done on the study. He referred the need to pursue all alternatives to assist transportation, Including that of Improving Hall Boulevard. He support the property owner's right to develop property. Councilor Dirksen was In favor of continuing work on the Preliminary Engineer's Repots City Engineer Duenas commented on talk of a new railroad yard - he said that this 1 would be outside the scope of this project. He reviewed the next steps, which would be to make formal application to ODOT for the bridge. Mr. Duenas clarified that with regard to testimony presented by Mr. Frewing, that updated fioodplain maps would be used In the report. Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - March 111 2003 Page 8 1 Councilors Moore, Wilson, and Dirksen supported proceeding with the report; Coundlor Sherwood was not In favor of moving forward with more work on the Lid. 1 5a' o° Page 9 Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - March 11, 2003 It eytension C~kwoll-jcjald\Na ssment 5101091c,al Asse 2004 Vebfu3ri 00\~ e s d, XUTJ fe to 1 City of Tigard Wall Street Extension Biological Assessment February 2004 1 1 Photo 3. View of Pinebrook Creek's East Pond looking southwest to northeast. ~ ` `~1 r}Y ~0 ' ff / f Photo 4. Pinebrook Creek's existing confluence with Fanno Creek at east end of East Pond, August 2003. FES 03071 46 Fishman Environmental Services, LLC I 1 I 1 r ~`;w I /r - .~.,,~~,A ~ v ~..r>-•,r...~-, I I it v II fl ~ I ~1,~~,~~`~0 ~ r I r j ~ j I I I - 1 l I ~r I 'd , tv r! 1 t~ r'I P~ I ` v ~r ~ I 1 I I 1 - It I r .t A aKt I 1 r I I W I~' tn~1. 1 r I t e•1 I I l i r 1 j l I I 1 ~ ~~1 ~ .I ~ I Il ~ L ' ~ 811 `t A ' i I r r r i, r- - - - - - - - (14 r l r l Hundred year t l 1 1 I 1 ~ j { I al --a~ T v flood Din I I i ~I, I l JIh.- boundary - - d/adrrdg11,/i r I I Ai I O~ <r , I 1 1 I I 1 I• I I I I l I h ~ i ! I~ I- I ~ I 1•' ~I l. r t .~`".Ta, • I ( f' h I~t r 1 I I I ~I/~ r i I Rbyd ay Grading gfmi 1 1 / II w / ~ ,1 - ~~f ~ I~~ 1 i I ,i, I ~I t o 1 1 ~ l 1 1` V \ 7 ~ I y 1 SE -I .J~,, f I r t rr 1 1 t r t a \I 11 _ 1 ! I ~ I I~ I ~I . L - ! , - - - - -3- 1, We,(I nd impact\area =0.5J Acres 1 ~ 1 v 12. W flood cut and\flll; H't _!t' iCu1 i - ral I i !\y It' - x~, I 4 { jut= 0.28 acres j299 cu yd) it 1 ~ , ~ , Ar r f , I _ll t I I / hill= 0.25 acres (1892 cu yd) yI a ~ 1 l {r I 1 1r 3rr Acres Impact= Floodplain 0.54 ~ I ! ~ ~ ~ 1 I I _ , t 1 r 1 I 0.54 Acres cut 0,16 Acres till i ' T" F 1 y , lf. r - I t 1- _ r, ~u* i h~ r i ]r q I q . t 1 1 I 1 4} Berm removal= 0.34 Acres J f r r S j 1, % I Jv~t t 5. Wetland creation= 0.09 acres I I i 1 UL1 i II f'I y ~ r I I ,~.A r r l . 'j 1 t 1 T'- } ! / A ^ 1 „ t 1 6. Wetland enhancement= 0.39 acres f r r l I 1 n Yom,, r m vet 1~ , 3 r. L I ( q I i 7. Wetland restoration= u to 0.21 acres l gl l 1-1 I P q 5 I I \ - ~p~ ' la of It I La:e,„~.i tt~'i.l ~ c r WEf14N0 1 U LL,rI 1 ' PHASE Z / i 1 , A I p~ ~ I i r ~ /iA ~ 1 I Il~;r r t I q H q I I ' 2 25 Idlli~Ir 1. Wetland impact area = 0.09 Acres 10 r q I 1 r Z iY ~t - t IB I :rIP~;QI \It 2. Wetland cut and /ilf: 1~ Cut= 0 cu Fill= 0.09 acres (1057 cu yd) _ - 1 W - - - - vI -1 r T~ ~•T H1 I~ 1t 7; H I 1111 v 3. floodplain impact= 1 K 1 J I e IIIiIY I CITY OF TIGARD LIBRARY 11 " v 0.07 Acres removal 0.53 Acres fill - 111 I y 11n ` Q IJ10 sq. ft. Iq 777 sq. (t. z~l 1 , .Ill„1,~,11~~~ ~J::~1 ~'_L1.~.~~_.~~i ~~~-.~'Ll~~.~ , ~E 4aY ~t;tl 1.,....• ® 'EI® ~~~,'1 2 494 sq. It. Bosq,R. a 11 1 I~ l I i F f b't.' rq!'rr _ I II ® 59s9.ft. I ~ 1 1 ~ . f ! , ~ / I I :I' ~ vI 1 l4 t rr'a 1 ~ ~ I I 19 79 sq. R: 1 1 1 r , / L l1 1 r 1 'Y , / 1 i \ 11)t ' 1 I f I I 1 ? r r, r t i Irl:- ~l , r 1 0 7841 sq. ft. 20 98 s q. It. Y w Q) 2436 sq. ft. Gro r y LmrR r' l 2 i t 1068 sq. 1t. •r , ~ ~ r x~~~ - ~i ~ ~ , 11 v 2l ~ l r , II'il ~ i r vc Sc> . r ' 21 n 626 sq. ft. @ 31 sq. ft. 557 sq• ft 23 1691, sq. /t. 345 sq, rG 24 804 sq. lt. / - j - - _ 19 - - - - - - - - f 7A 54 sq. R. 25 1,9478 sq. R b ~ ~ 14, I ~ I 7B 727 sq. ft. ,I . ~ y' t s_ - I ` \ ` ` H -~I W - - I ~8 1792 sq. ft u....,y T , 10,503 sq. ft. 5487 sq. ft. z 1 IhIIII- m--tr"~. YI<<vi'vv1~~(il ri NO a~f~~limit! 1 qq 7185 sq. It. III;ryI 1 1 r i.,rf / I ti t 1 t i / ) 1 q @ l2 IJ25 sq. ft. t t IIII~I 9 ii WE~fAhIO/ } - I `r 1 \ Y U 11 11 itt Wf4A j11j111- . / ✓ f e h Y~4 \V . It ~t 11 1At l 12118 sq. ft. F III( 'A rr r 7 t, v ~,,7~ ~ I N i ~ { - I~ i,,.- 4 r / - t I 11.Y11 I 1 I r7 I J. ,l 111 / C 1 P I r t 19 9A. 0169sg1I 11 i ~l~/rrrr-71 ~\t\IiFdsul~+(~ II ijjlGl+lllljtlt 5` C- r t\t,IIIQG I t4 j0169 sq. lt. Ih~ fT" l u I;t'Yrrr ~v~tr ll,tl,.~,di1l /rllblr /l 71 ~Gradfng L nd l5 2127 sq. fl. U l t h I 1 " 1 t411 L FA~OINT I 11 Tti~ I ~ ~ 11 li 1 I t I~ - ~ . U I I i t I ~ 1 ~ I t ,f7/A~n bJ. I" I II t 1 19 J148 sq. ft. rr t ~11 I' I ~I 1 etc ET 18` I~lv~~~~~`, ! x'7;1' g l! I k ! SHE NO. BY ~'P• 111J110.7 9450 S.W. Commute Gal¢ DE HAAS Se"e~ WALL STREET -LID DATE MISION- ° NlSnrn Ile, Uegon 31070 - DESIGNED BY: S~~frca a DRAWN BY: ssoci&"" Inc STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS q n, CaosWBo( n ~{Ineere k. Surveyors PHONE: (501) 682-2450 I. CHECKED BY: FAX: 682-4018 DATE' nAK A~ CITY OF TIGARD YIETLAND MITIGATION AND STREAM RESTORATION OF SCALE: AS. SHOWN N1 December 17, 2002 02.644..118 ENGINEEPIUG DEPARTMENT _ PROJECT NO. DATE FILE FILE'LOCA110N. ` \ p r ' ✓ \ DRAWING PLOTTED AT HALF THE NOTED 5CALE W1 Thru W3= Weir offset 15~ ; 1 v lei S1= r~ ~01 /Aw r~\ 3~ ry, ry~ ~1 ° '1/ yy~ yy 1x II { / x h 1 g h 0 i ,1 ~ ryx Hey ® FTC/ l ' xry 0 p 9' 0 9 1~ ~ x y p 1~„~ ~ f0'I ~ .'rI•l I 5 G7/ p yp• . ~ ~N y0 01k1. f ~k` 1 '^alw.:' ~ ~ S \ ' " y Ue I ~I ` "1W 1 1 7 Rough grade CAL !b Ox A~ See sheet~9 and 10 for details V / / A \ PLAN 160 160 - 155 - Ori inol ground 155 Rough grading C/L Profile g ade) 150 d ---15b - - - - - - - - - 7Zf QC - F' f~ - 145 45 I PRO LE 140 ra cole: Ho-z. 1!0 140 ue . 1"=5' 7 O N N1 N7 N n K) r- d p n a 00 d In o 0) J to (D d d N1 d d d N7 N7 Ur u) N N N 177 N O a d d d d d d d d d d d a m a m a c6 do 00 o) m at m N aC W 07 00 D) 0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20 f 2+40 r 2+60 2 80 SOR, 360 - AGC Center SHEET DATE- RENSION. - Na. BY fxp.721J!10J DE HAAS 6450 S.N. Commerce Circle W1,on Ile, Oregon 62070 WALL STREET EXTENSION (PH. 11 R~ DESIGNED BY. MJD ~S,FE°PROI~f ~sociates Inc 'yr;r II VS t~''rU by DRAWN BY. LM s o-~ eu ° p11 CoomWn{ En{Ineen k°S CHECKED BY. MJD oneyon pHDK(; (503) 6112 -2450 STREET 8, UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS DATE: xx-xx-xx FAX: 682 6 -4016 CITY OF TIGARD STREAM RESTORATION PLAN 6 PROFILE SCALE: AS OF V SHGWN"NIAJ'OW''' ' PA0.1ECi ND. 02.629,1 IB DATE JANUARY, 2004 FILE 02.629.118 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT - FlLE LDCA7IGN: \ ORAWINC PLOTTED AT " „ - - HALF TNf NOiEO SCALE I /Cj 14-t. 29 od l l dry, _ `J L o 0h pxhp x- t, ~4 1 ~5 6 l~ ~ ~ ~ x~9't~ir ~ Np~ ~hh b ~.y9 .._....1~.., \J,{ I 1 1b~ _ 13a ti ~h oe ti c.~.! tr p h a0 O j x,06 x,'0$' ~ 00 1, b (is N op " op 5S SS b \ \ Rough grode C/L lylti n o tip PLAN scale: 1"=10' R ugh gr ding C/ - (Profile grad) Ori inol gro nd 145 145 - 36' Cl L=0.00 140 140 - - - AL 35 135 h 3+26.31 4+19 70 130 L 130. PRO ILE .J scale: m ~ rt 1 "=5' ~ ~ 12s W J 125 M N CO N -t N N n 0) "N r- 01 (D O O O 0) N N a O N 7 N O r r M 00 M. 'M N N M M N V N t0 CO O) cC D0 r M N 0) M M M M a a a a a a a M 5+2D 2 80 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 4+20 4+40 4+60 4+80 5+00 - SHEET NO. BY E,<p.1213110J DEHAAS 9450-M-ceCr STREET EXTENSION (PH. 1) R3 DATE AENSQN DSYI.O,ep0°70 WALL DESIGNED BY: MJD NRftO PROf~}. r Wlsanu lle re9an 9107D DRAWN BY LMy ~by~i s ¢m ssocia,teEoEineerek %,Gu Inc. STREET & UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS x. ConeuWoE m7on *Tit 1~1A~ CHECKED BY:. MJD PHONE: (503) 684-4150 OF DATE: %%-%%-X% FAX: 682-1018 CITY OF TGAPD STREAM RESTORATION PLAN d PROFILE X SCALE: AS SHOWN J. flLE L OCADON PROJECT NO. 04,629.118 GATE JANUARY, 2004 TILE 02.629. 118 ENCMEEAiNC DEPARTMENT - F RA PGNIW LOTTED AT LF THE NOW SCALE I I PLAN \ Scale: 1 10' ~I ~ ox /135 \ /l I I Rough grade C/L ~ \ ~ \ I x ~ 145 145 ough gr ding C - (Pro ile grad) 140 140 Origi al grou d 135 d 135 f ° 130 N- 130 tole: H iz. 1 "=7 ' _ ue t. 1 "=5' 125 'm (j 125 N a J m 01 DO DOO CD N oo 00 a a t o a 120 N N2 2 rl M ~ ~ ~2 to to 120 ~ ~ M ~ - ~J 7+20 7+40 5+20 5+40 5+60 5+80 6+00 6+20 6+40 6+60 6+80 7+00 SHEET Suite 300 - AGC Center NO. BY £XP.121JI10J DExaas 9450s.N.commerce Circle WALL STREET EXTENSION (PH. 11 R4 DATE ' REMION - `0 R 9 Wlsortnlle, Oregon 97070 DESIGNED BY MJD OyN~,e xc«eOr~~O c v r k DRAWN BY. LM ~ oi SuInSTREET UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS $ CHECKED BY. A ulW( EnEioeers k lare C V PHONE: 15031 682-2150 OF aww+ FAY: 602-1016 A DATE xz xx XX ~Zx 1 od STREAM RESTORATION PLAN & PROFILE scnlE AsSHOWN CITY OF TIGARD FILE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ne•oR'~ JANUARY, 2004 02:829.118 LOCATION. PAOvECT N0, 02.614.118 DATE FILE 1 0~ DRAWING PLOTTED AT ► V~ _ HALF THE NOTED SCALE 4 2.0' H2O' ry ' _ !Y 1, ?,0' V 50, or 8.0, h 0' 4.0' 5.0' or 8.0 4, 4,0, A . a A - - • - --1T p,,,- - I ~ I i ,i V L _ C t of weir-/ C/tof Wei ' 4' wide x 10' long J5' wrAe x !0' Ion Root wad Erosion control fabric £rosion conrol lobric wr0 fgp pieta 1W 4.0' p4 rebar llusnh J.5' wide x 10' long pis and insert a Erosion control fabric 0nl!ece5/8' hole thru both Log Weir Detail 2 Scale: 1 4'-0" Rock Weir Detail Log Weir Detail 1 Scale: 1 4'-0" Scale; 4'-0" Profile grade 12" to 18" rock Profile line 4.0' de J-0 g - and grade D D- - 12" Typ, or 0' e 4. 0' min, log b I 6" to 8" ryp. Section C-C Erosion control fabric Cut line _ J5' x t0' typical of Section A-A Stole: 1 4'-0° C/L of wei I ~ ~ alt weir locations. Scale.- 1 4'-0" ^ B 4.0' p . 8" Mn B J5' wide x 10' log tog Erosion control fa nc B,0' min, 12" Min. Rock Log Weir Detail 3 L Note: See Plan Sheets J, 4, 5 and Scaler t"= 4'-0" Detail Sheet No. 10 for Log Weir Detail 4 weir/Pool offset configuration. d Profile grade 80 I Rough grade C/t R 4.0' Profile grade 2" dia. log min. r Erosion control fabric Section D-D Section B-B J.5' x 10' typical at Scale' 1- 4'-0" Scale.. 1' 4'-0" ol/ weir locations. SHEET Suib'o - D. DATE REVISION ND. ' BY Exp. '2PRO DE HAAS 9'~ S.w.`regon WALL STREET EXTENSION (PH. 1) R6 w9,anan, Oregon 91oTD - - DESIGNED BY, - MJD StfpC AUffr• s ° ° k DRAWN BY: a b; ssociates, Inc, ',~NINl1~ STREET & UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS 1o IDaE Bnilne°n 9 9ungo CHECKED BY: MJD ConnI n9 W FAME, -4018 t•tlso OF X DATE - (AM; 692.1016 ~n, ,o° CITY OF TICARD STREAM RESTORATION DETAILS SCALE AS SHOWN SINJ.Oe'' - ~AA/uARY 2(7(74 02,629.118 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT - - - - PROJECT NO, 02.629.113 DATE FILE - FILE LODA110N DRAWING PLOiTEO Ai FA LF THE NOTED SCALE 15 F wri" 6 »n5 ' 125' 125' s I---~ 1.0 1.° 0.5 J- .5 I - - - 1 - - L0 0.5 0+80.5 0.5 0.5 a o--- T0.5 r, _~T---- e E F 1.0 1.0 pQW S CT70N -E _ :t Stda I'• p' Hmv. r, a5' wrt. G 1. 1.0 SIX imuvo vuvnHC r V h0uG1 cRNC 1.0 src xtNM7 vl.w7wC D(1M - L!!-- 7 / 0.5 AETfANO SECTION F-F I•• 70' Nuir. 1'• 0.5' Wrt. 0+60 ~EF and grade Profile C/L PLAN VIEW Scale:: 1 4 Rough grade OIL • _ 5 ' L5'. Profile grade tr! x c 0' 10.0' 2.0' 25.0' S2 Scale. 11-- 4' J m SECTION G-G w J SHEET QATE AEN SIGN Sme 30o N BY fXP.'2I"%°' DEHAAS "50 S.W,Commmm"ce "Circle WALL STREET EXTENSION (PH. R$ WlsOrcnlle Aegan 91010 DESIGNED BY:. IJJD S~Y'aEq`o J: DRAWN BY LM a I\ CHECKED EY:... MJD ,tn,. 4r rde aii teSs nc. i I M CSmuIDn{Endneer5&SuI7on PHONE: ISgJ1 5E2-2/ED STREET 8 UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS 12 C 682-1018 0 r y _ DatE' zx-zz-xz ~-srcg CITY OF TIGARD STREAM RESTORATION DETAILS I SCALE: AS SNOWN T~ilAIOsY`" JANUARY, 2004 02.629. 118 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT .:PROJECT NO, 02.629.118 DATE FILE FlEE LC-CATION: i t; ~ 02:P,4i2004 03:31 - NQ.951 901 ' - Gtr S~ %ss 1 gon I Department of Transportation Ure F ' < ( V Rail Division " r 'n,eodorc R. Kulongosl:4 Coveraor 555-131 Street NE-Suite 3 - Salem, OR 97301-4179 Telephone 503-986-4321 January 15, 2004 PAX 503-986-3183 TTY 503-986-3416 CHARLES KETTENRING VP ENGINEERING Post-Ir Fax Now 7671 ca"4 1p ~a9es~ 3 PORTLAND & WESTERN RR INC To lks IVUe., From U&A t•-e, No4-,rw L, 650 HAWTHORNE AVE SE STE 220 co.roept.~AS ss~>✓ co. T SALEM OR 97301 phone N Phon9 a 503-G8,2- sa 503' G JOHN TRUMBULL, PUS PROJECTS ENG Fax# S?p ,-6s2-401 F Fax# ya3- ~0 2~ UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 5424 BE McLOUGHLIN BLVD PORTLAND OR 97202 RX 1169: In the Matter of the Construction of a New Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing at Wall Street Extension and UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (UP), a Delaware Corporation, leased to PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD, INC. (PNWR), Tillamook District, and PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD, INC., Oregon Electric District, in Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Application has been received from the City of Tigard in the above-cited matter. By letter dated October 14, 2003 (copy enclosed), ODOT Rail Division (Division) staff requested amendments to the City of Tigard's application. Division staff received amendments to City of Tigard's application on January 5, 2004. The amendments included: 1 • Letter of Transmittal from City of Tigard dated 12/03/03 • Letter dated November 26, 2003, from David Evans & Associates • Amended application Pages 1, 2, 5, 6, and 8 only • Amended Drawing Sheet R1 dated 11/21/03 • Amended Drawing Sheets 1 and X dated 11105/03 e Copy of letters dated September 29, 2003, from De Haas & Associates to John Rosenberger, Deputy Director ODOT; Matt Garrett, Region 1 Engineer, ODOT; and Kathy Lehtola, Director Land Use & Transportation, Washington County • Copy of letters dated September 26, 2003, from De Haas & Associates to Walter Rivers, CPM, Deening Management Group; Alan Knokey, COE Manufacturing Company; and Cheryl Bennett, Norris Beggs & Simpson Copies of the application and amendments were, on this date, served on all parties. PNWR and UP are requested to review the application and amendments and provide their respective written positions to the amended application within 20 days. If additional time for review of this matter is requested in writing prior to February 5, 2004, such written requests will be duly considered due to the complexity of this matter. ~i•m 7~F.6~ii't I MN (9203 (1-03) 1 d2/04/2004 03:31 - RX 1159 January 15, 2004 Page 2 Parties providing comments or documentailon are requested to serve the materials on all other parties of record In a formal case, and provide proof of service to the Division. ' If you serve materials regarding this matter, please use a form similar to the enclosed cerMcate of service. e G C. David Lan ing Sr. Crossing Speclallst _ ReH-Divislon - Crossing-Safety Program 503.986.4267 ' (FAX) 503.986.3183 Email: david.lanningiModot.state.or.us Cc: Agustin Duenas, City of Tigard (less enclosures) Enclosures: Application and Amendments Division Staff Letter dated October 14, 2003 G:1W0 ML%CDLVO0] PMecmTNt A%AX 1169 StrAce latter for Anunded App),doc 1 ,0/04/2004 03:31 N0.951 1?03 1 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE RX 1159 I, Linda Williams, Administrative Specialist of the Rail Division for the Department of Transportation of the State of Oregon, hereby certify that on the 15th day of January, 2004, I served copies of staff's service letter, amended application, various correspondence and other supporting documentation upon the appropriate parties listed below via certified mail at Salem, Oregon, with postage prepaid and addressed as their addresses appear in the records of the Department of Transportation. APPLICANT _ _ . _ _ . ~ _ . AGUSTIN DUENAS CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 PARTIES CHARLES KETTENRING, VP ENGINEERING PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD 650 HAWTHORNE AVE NE STE 220 SALEM OR 97301 JOHN TRUMBULL UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 5424 SE MCLOUGHLIN BLVD PORTLAND OR 97202 1 Linda Williams, Administrative Specialist Oregon Department of Transportation Rail Division F:w9„ra11/11v; X-RC MUSTS AND LOGS/sen I.doe 1 l.1 ~E U g 2004 RA<< Di VISION a Qinam" & Wyaminp campony C David Lanning February 3, 2004 Sr. Crossing Specialist MOT Rail Division 555 13'" St NE Salem, Or 97301 RX 1159, Wall St, Tigard, OR e Portland & Western Railroad objects to this new at grade public crossing for the followic;o reasons 1. This crossing is not necessary. The property to be developed can be accessed from public streets from both sides of the track. 2. We have repeatedly, over the past 4 years, indicated to the City (both verbally and in writing) we would not object to an overhead structure. There is adequate land on both sides of our right of way to build an overpass without having to remove any existing structures. A 3. We have made it clear all along that the doable track at this location is vital to our train operations. We have three lines that converge here from Hillsboro, Portland, and Salem. This junction is used to meet and pass trains, swap cars from one train to another, and to reverse train direction by stopping it and moving the locomotives from one end to the other. The proposed crossing would be right in the middle of these operations and there is no other uninterrupted double track segment to perform this work. Therefore, construction of this crossing would have a severe negative impact on interstate rail transportation. 4. This location is also in the middle of the new Washington County rail corridor. In the very near future there will be up to 30 passenger trains per day on this track at speeds of 60 to 70 miles per hour. In the interest of public safety, grade crossings need to be eliminated, not added. 5. The spur track which the City proposes to remove serves two warehouses. We have made it clear to the City that interstate commerce law prohibits removal of this track until both property owners extinguish their easements and relinquish their right to be connected to the rail network. dliz r 6 % Charles S Kettenring, PE Vice President Engineering Portland & Western Railroad. Inc. 660 Hawthorne Ave. SE, Ste 220 Salem, OR 97301 503.366-7717 FAX 503-365-7787 02i0yi2004 00:53 N0.955 D04 Cc: Carolyn Larson, Kilmer, Voorhees & Laurick Jon Trumbull, Union Pacific Agustin Duenas, City of Tigard Daniel Blocher, PE TriMet I '~u Qe1,~ vim- ~e,~ 3 ! taa e APPLICANT AGUST'IN DUENAS CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 PARTdES ® CHARLES KETTENRING, VP l3NGINEFRING 2 ® PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD 1) 650 HAWTHORNE AVE NE STE 220 SALL, M OR 97301 3 JOHN TRUMBULL UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 5424 SE MCLOUGHLIN BLVD PORTLAND OR 97202 November 26, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Larry Phipps General Manager Portland & Western Railroad, Inc. 1 10 West I0'" Avenue Albany, Oregon 97321 Dear Mr. Phipps: The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) does not have the funding or the intention to address improvements in capacity to Highway 99W or Hall Boulevard in the City of Tigard. For proper circulation within the City, we must develop alternate routes to bypass Highway 99W and Hall Boulevard. One of two new key alternate routes identified in Tigard's draft Transportation System Plan (TSP) is the extension of Wall Street from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard. This connection is projected to cant' about 5,000 to 7,000 vehicles per day and would reduce the level of traffic at two key intersections (HalVHunziker and 72°d/Bonita Road). Based on traffic modeling conducted for the draft TSP, this new connector produces adequate capacity at those two locations, and relieves Hall Boulevard suffici°ntly to allow that street to function adequately 1 at 3 instead of 5 lanes. This proposed street would allow northbound traffic from south Tigard to bypass Hall Boulevard and proceed directly to Hunziker Street, then north to the Tigard Triangle (a triangular area in Tigard bounded by I-5, Highway 217, and Highway 99W). A proposed future overcrossing of Highway 217 would allow traffic to connect directly from Hunziket to Hampton Street in the Tigard Triangle. Enclosed is a report prepared by our transportation consultant, DKS Associates, Inc. In the report, Wall Street is proposed to connect to Hall Boulevard at O'Mara Street. However, the actual connection point could be at O'Mara or south of that location depending upon an analysis of physical, access control, right-of-way and environmental constraints, as well as parcel consolidation, in the development of the final alignment. That flexibility will be included in the TSP for this proposed connector. The connection point to Hall Boulevard could vary, but the portion of the connector from the railroad tracks north to Hunziker would be built in the roadbed formed by the existing service road and spur track adjacent to and immediately east of the COE Manufacturing facility. We have discussed the importance of the Wall Street Extension to Tigard's future plans in a meeting with your predecessor, Mr. Jim Benz. This letter is to reiterate the importance of this connection to us, and to again our interest in seeing this new connector street constructed. Mr. Fred Fields, the owner of much of the property over which this street would be constructed, is greatly interested in seeing this link established and is willing to participate in the construction of a portion of the proposed street. In discussions with ODOT, the Rail Division has indicated a preference for the City and Portland & Western to work out an agreement of support for ,13125 SW Hall Blvd.. Tigard. OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 construction of this street prior to approaching them with an application. For this connector roadway to be constructed, the following are the actions that we need to address with Portland & Western: ■ Removal of the spur track from [tic Fields property • At grade crossings of the railroad tracks as shown in the report In addition to the City's transportation system improvement benefits, there could be some significant advantages to Portland & Western in supporting the construction of this new street. ; These advantages are summarized as follows: • The roadway will open traffic to the old Brick Company property not presently utilized. This opens approximately 1,600 lineal feet of railroad frontage along the main line. • The roadway will create opportunity to install rail on COE Manufacturing land at the old Georgia Pacific site providing another 500 lineal feet of railroad frontage. • The roadway creates an entirely new rail traffic opportunity by opening another 2,700 lineal feet of new rail frontage riot now accessible. ■ The total new frontage is approximately 4,800 lineal feet, or almost one mile of new potential usage in place of the 2,000 lineal feet of frontage represented by the spur track, which has been available for the last 35 years but not used. ■ Finally, it allows for the development of approximately 75 acres, which would create opportunities for greater volumes of rail traffic in Tigard. In summary, this proposed new connector roadway opens opportunities for increased rail volumes, provides an alternate route to Highway 99W and Hall Boulevard for traffic accessing the Tigard Triangle, and provides better traffic circulation in the core area of Tigard. Please review the enclosed report from DKS. The draft TSP (including the new Wall Street Extension) is scheduled for City Council adoption at the Council meeting on January 8, 2002. We will be calling you after the TSP adoption to set a meeting for further discussion of this proposed connection. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. L ~ Sincerely, P OL.", STIN P. DUENAS, P.E. Ci Engineer Enclosure c: William A. Monahan, City Manager lAEng\Gus\Lc"m\Letter to Portland & Western's New General Manager I I-26-Ol.doc Letter to Portland & Western Regarding the Wall Street Extension Page 2 C~ 7b Portland & Western Railroad, Inc. J ` LLO~ 110 West 10th Avenue G Albany, Oregon 97321 1 . o...... a wr•~~•• ~•Tr••r (541)924-6560 v -CIGAR Facsimile (541)924.6580 January 21, 2002 Augustin P. Duenas, P.E. City Engineer City of Tigard I am writing this letter in response to your letter of November 26, 2001 concerning the proposed extension of Wall Street from Hunziker to Hall. You indicated that you had discussed this extension with my predecessor, Mr. Jim Benz. My position on the matter is the same as that of Mr. Benz and I will summarize that position here. The rail served warehouses are inactive but any removal of their spur tracks would require the agreement of the warehouse owners as well as the Union Pacific, owner of the track and easement. The area at which Wall would cross P&W's mainline is the only place within the Beaverton to Greton Corridor where trains cans be met or passed without blocku' lg 1 crossings. Frequently traffic is set out in this location and trains are often run-around for movement in the reverse direction. All of these moves require an area free of grade crossings. If Wal! is to be extended it must be grade separated to preserve the functional utility that now exists. Further the proposed commuter operation between WilsonvW,-- and Beaverton wail p!acc over thirty new train movements per day thru the area and many of those trains will also meet in that location on the Wall Street extension. This too calls for a grade separation. Because of the adverse impact on P&W train operations I oppose any extension that is rot grade separated. I apologize fbr the delay in responding but your letter was misplaced. Respectfully, aPresident and General Manager Portland & Western 7G City of Tigard Wall Street Extension Project Railroad Coordination Meeting Agenda September 19, 2002 Attendees: Vannie Nguyen, Project Manager, City of Tigard Gus Duenas, City Engineer, City of Tigard Marlin DeHaas, DeHaas and Associates Marc Butorac, Kittelson and Associates Steve Metz, David Evans and Associates Craig Reiley, Manager Crossing Safety, ODOT Rail Division Charles Kettenring, AVP Engineering, Portland and Western RR Notes by Steve Metz e 1. Introductions I1. Purpose of Meeting - Collect and share information. 111. Project Overview Gus discussed the background of the roadway project. The project leas been a part of the City's Transportation System Plan (TSP) for a very long time. The TSP indicated construction of the Wall St. Extension would occur when development occurs in the area. 1 Development is planned in the area including the Library project and a 400-unit housing project. An adjacent property owner, Mr. Fields, is willing to participate in a LID that would provide the funding for the project. The proposed roadway project would connect Hunziker and Hall by crossing over the two existing railroad track at-grade and cross Fanno Creek on a new bridge. The road is planned to be 3 lanes wide, with bike lanes and sidewalks. The roadway right-of-way would be 70' wide. The TSP anticipates 7,000 vehicles per day on the road. IV. Railroad Operations Charles Kettenring discussed the Portland and Western railway facilities and operations. Two parallel tracks run northwest and southeast across the proposed Wall St. extension. A junction occurs to the north of Tiederman Ave. where the two tracks join into one track that continues to the north. Both tracks are used alternately as a mainline track. The two tracks separate to the south of Bonita Rd. The Oregon Electric track continues to Wilsonville and the UPRR track turns eastward. The Oregon electric track to the west is owned by ODOT. PNWR has an exclusive easement to operate on the track. The eastern track is owned by UPRR. PNWR has an operating lease to operate on this track. 1 PNWR runs 8 trains per day on this track. This could grow to 10 trains per day in the future. Three types of operations occur on this portion of the tracks: switching, storage and transfer. Switching involves building trains by coupling cars together to form a train. The storage of trains occurs on this stretch of track when facilities are not ready to receive a train. A train is sometimes stored over night. The transfer movement occurs when trains come northbound from the south. The train is stopped while the locomotive switches ends by running around the train on the second track. It then proceeds onto the UPRR track to the south east. The addition of the Wall St. extension as an at-grade crossing would disrupt the existing railroad operations. The disruption would make it impossible to perform the three operations described above on this portion of track. No other similar segment of track is available that could perform the same functions. The project proposes to remove the spur track that extends across Hunziker running parallel to Wall St. This track serves two warehouses on the east side of Hunziker. The spur track cannot be eliminated unless the warehouse property owners agree to its removal in writing. 1 The future operations of the railroad will change with the addition of the proposed Washington County Commuter Rail project. The commuter rail project will add 30 to 50 trains per day through this corridor operating at speeds from 60 to 70 miles an hour. PNWR is close to signing an agreement to allow the commuter rail project. The time frame for operation of the commuter rail to begin is in fall of 2005. V. ODOT Crossing order procedure Craig Reiley described the ODOT crossing order application process. With the current design, existing rail operations and future commuter rail operations the project does not look like a good idea. ODOT is not supporting any new at-grade crossing projects. When a crossing order permit is submitted, it will be routed to the railroads (PNWR and UPRR) and ODOT rail for comment. Currently, the railroads and ODOT rail would object to the new at-grade crossings. The application would next go to a public hearing. The City, railroads and ODOT rail would present their cases for and against the crossing before the hearings officer. The City would need to provide all of the background information for the hearings officer. The hearings officer would make a recommendation. The head of ODOT Bruce Warner would make the final decision. Craig did not recommend letting the project get to the point of a public hearing. This puts the hearings officer, a lawyer, in charge of making an engineering decision. VI. General Discussion Possible next steps. How can the project be approved? An idea that Charles had was to 1 build a connection in Tualatin. The connection would connect the Oregon Electric line with the PNWR line that runs from Sherwood to Lake Oswego. This would eliminate the need for the transfer operation in Tigard. The connection would consist of an aerial trackway, 4,000' long, that would eliminate two at-grade crossings in Tualatin and allow for the abandonment of the Oregon Electric track along Fanno Creek between Tualatin- Sherwood Highway and Bonita Rd. The abandoned portion of track could then be used as a trail and bike path. The project would need cooperation amongst Tualatin, Tigard and ODOT. At the Oregon Electric trackway, PNWR owns the track and a permanent and exclusive easement. The State of Oregon owns the underlying real estate. ODOT owns the Oregon Electric right-of-way. The cost of the project is anticipated to be approximately $10 million. The funding could come from multiple sources including MT1P. The concept is that the larger project to the south would eliminate the impact on PNWR operation and at least two at-grade crossings. In exchange for these benefits, the at-grade crossings at Wall St. would be allowed. Construction of a grade separated crossing for Wall St. was also discussed. The benefits e discussed included: no impact to railway operations and increased safety. The negative aspects included: limited access for the adjacent property owners that are paying for the project, additional costs of approximately $5 million. Possible variations as part of the grade separation design could include, the addition of frontage roads, the relocation of the tracks to move them closer together allowing for a shorter bridge span and land for frontage roads. ' Craig suggested keeping the discussions open. He stated that the City is free to pursue the at-grade crossing concept. He offered to review information that the City would like to use to help build their case to justify the at-grade crossing design. A draft crossing permit application can be submitted to receive comments and input from ODOT rail. Responses could happen in a couple of weeks. 1 d Department of Transportation Oregon Rail Division John A. Kitzhaber, M.D., Covemor 555-13't' Street NE-Suite 3 Salem, OR 97301-4179 September 26, 2002 Telephone (503) 986-4321 FAX (503) 986-3183 TTY (503) 986-3416 AGUSTIN P DUENAS TIGARD CITY ENGINEER G yti 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 File Code: RE: Proposed Wall Street Extension across Railroad Tracks in Tigard f wanted to take this opportunity to reduce my thoughts and comments from our meeting on September 19, 2002, to writing regarding the City's proposed Wall Street extension. Vannie T Nguyen, Engineering Manager; Steve Metz, DEA; Marlin J. DeHaas, DeHaas & Associates; Charles Kettenring, Portland & Western Railroad Company; you and I attended the meeting. Based on an aerial photo with a potential alignment of the proposed Wall Street extension and your opening remarks, ODOT Rail staff cannot support the construction of an at-grade crossing at the subject location. Our understanding and experience suggests that placing a grade crossing in the area where railroad switching operations occur is not a good idea. When you factor in the likelihood of 30-50 commuter trains, you create a situation that has historically been problematic for the motoring public and the railroad. Mr. Kettenring voiced the railroad's opposition to the crossing proposal. He also provided a copy of a letter dated January 21, 2002, which articulated the railroad position. A review of our files reveals notes from Dave Lanning, ODOT Rail from a meeting held July 25, 2000, which summarizes the same type of comments from both staff and the railroad. After some discussion, there were other additional considerations the City had that may impact our position regarding the City's proposal. We discussed the process and the various steps in the process up to and including a formal hearing. While I voiced staffs concerns about the proposal, I also reiterated that the City had the right to file an application for any type of crossing they deemed appropriate. I suggested that the City might want to file a draft application for comment from the parties. This would ensure that the City could provide all the documentation they can for staff and the railroad to consider before finalizing their positions. Please call if you have any questions regarding this matter. Craig J. Raril y - , CL Manager Crossing Safety 503.986.4273 Fax: 503.986.3183 craig.j. reileyCc-_Dstate.or.us J_ _m cc: Vannie T. Nguyen Charles Kettenring, P&W RR Co. A Steve Metz, DEA Marlin DeHass, DeHaas & Assoc. H:1wg rail) AWall St Tigard.doc Form 735-9203 (4-02) 1 - 02i09i2004 00:53 N0.955 D01 F~~ 6 Department of Transportation r 1 r < i egon Rail DiviS1*011 13Y: 555-13`' Street NE-SuitO.1 Theodore R. KL11011goski, Govemor Salem, OR 97301-4179 Telephone 503-986-43:1 FAX 503-986.3151 February 6, 2004 TTY 503-986-34 1 r, 1 1 AUGUSTIN DUENAS CITY OF TIGARD File Code: 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 RX 1159: In the Matter of the Construction of a New RailroadHighway Grade Crossing at Wall Street Extension and UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (UP), a Delaware Corporation, leased to PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD, INC. (PNWR), Tillamook District, and PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD, INC., Oregon Electric District in Tigard Washington County Oregon. 1 By letter dated February 3, 2004, Portland & Western Railroad (PNWR) has filed its formal objections to the City of Tigard's application in the above matter. Copies of the PNWR letter of objection were, this date, served to all parties. The PNWR objection to a proposed at-grade crossing requires the City of Tigard to determine its next step. If the City desires to continue pursuing the proposed atgrade crossing, provide a written request that ODOT Rail Division set this matter for hearing. Another option is the City may withdraw its application, thereby abandoning its goal of having an at-grade crossing. A third option is the City may amend its application from an at-grade crossing proposal to a separated crossing proposal. 1 NOTE: Parties providing comments or documentation are required to serve the materials on all other parties of record In a formal case, and provide proof of service to Ran Division staff. The enclosed certificate of service is the form Rail Division uses to serve all correspondence. If you serve materials regarding this matter, please use a similar form. Staff requests City of Tigard provide its response to this letter within 20 days and serve all parties as required by OAR 137-003-0520(2). Call or email me if you have questions. 1 C. David Lanni Sr Crossing Specialist Rail Division - Crossing Safety Program 503.986.4267 (FAX) 503.986.3183 1 Email: david.lanning@odot.state.or.us cc: Service List G 1WG_RAI0C0IL033 ProJee W\PNWR\RX i 150 lanor re PNWR oC eGt o~:.JOC 1 02/09/2004 00:53 NO. 955 902 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE RJR 1159 I, Linda Williams, Administrative Specialist of the Rail Division for the Department of Transportation of the State of Oregon, hereby certify that on the 6th day of February, 2004, I served copies of staff's cover letter and Portland & Western's letter of objection upon the appropriate parties listed below via certified mail at Salem, Oregon, with postage prepaid and addressed as their addresses appear in the records of the Department of Transportation. APPLICANT AGUSTIN DUENAS CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW BALL BLVD e TIGARD OR 97223 PARTIES CHARLES KETTENRING, VP ENGINEERING PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD 650 HAWTHORNE AVE NE STE 220 SALEM OR 97301 JOHN TRUMBULL UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 5424 SE MCLOUGHLIN BLVD PORTLAND OR 97202 J Linda Williams, Administrative Specialist io Oregon Department of Transportation Rail Division J F:wg rsi1Alw/RX•RC SVC LISTS AND LOGS/scryI do February 27, 2004 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON C. David Lanning Sr. Crossing Specialist Rail Division - Crossing Safety Program Oregon Department of Transportation Rail Division 555-13`x' Street NE-Suite 3 Salem, OR 97301-4179 1 Re: RX 1159 Subject: Request for a Hearing on the City of Tigard's At-Grade Crossing Application Dear Mr. Lanning: The City of Tigard hereby requests that ODOT Rail Division set a hearing for the proposed at- grade crossing. Enclosed as requested in your letter of February 6, 2004 is a certificate of mailing to the other parties of record. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, V P. DUENAS, P.E. er Enclosure c: William A. Monahan, Tigard City Manager Vannie T. Nguyen, Tigard CIP Division Manager Tim Ramis, RCCB, City Attorney Marlin DeHaas, DeHaas and Associates IAVn foaVetlaaVdw m C4W faa rM=&q a heaftd= 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 City of Tigard Certificate of Service ODOT No.: RX 1159 I, Diane M. Jelderks, Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard Engineering Department, hereby certify that on the 27`h day of February, 2004, 1 served copies of staff's Request for hearing letter upon the appropriate parties listed below via certified mail at Tigard, Oregon, with postage prepaid and addressed as their addresses appear in the records of the City of Tigard. 1 PARTIES CHARLES KETTENRING, VP ENGINEERING PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD 650 HAWTHORNE AVE NE STE 220 A SALEM, OR 97301 JOHN TRUMBULL UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 5424 SE MCLOUGHLINE BLVD PORTLAND OR 97202 CAROLYN L. LARSON KILMER, VOORHEES & LAURICK 732 NW 19TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97209 --4 oq A4 Diane M. Jelderks, e or Administrative Specialist City of Tigard, Engineering Department I%erv%2007.2004 h dPkwan sueencer incze or senke - ceMee malkv esWoc •-t~e- July 23, 2001 Walter Rivers CITY OF TIGARD Property Manager Deering Management Group, Inc. OREGON 4800 SW Macadam Street Portland, OR 97201 Dear Mr. Rivers: The City of Tigard's draft Transportation System Plan (TSP) proposes the extension of Wall Street from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard. This proposed street would allow northbound traffic from south Tigard to bypass Hall Boulevard and proceed directly to Hunziker Street, then north to the Tigard Triangle. This connection is projected to carry about 5,000 to 7,000 vehicles per day and would reduce the level of traffic at two key intersections (Hall/Hunziker and 72odBonita Road). This new connector produces adequate capacity at those two locations, and 1 relieves Hall Boulevard sufficiently to allow that street to function adequately at 3 instead of 5 lanes. A proposed future overcrossing of Highway 217 will allow traffic to connect directly from Hunziker to Hampton Street in the Tigard Triangle. A key element in the construction of this new connection is removal of the existing spur track along Wall Street. The spur track runs along Wall Street and crosses Hunziker Street to serve property on the north side of that street. This spur track would have to be removed for the new street to be constructed. It is our understanding that your firm manages the Tigard Distribution Center property (presumably owned by Klokke Corporation) located west of the spur track. We would like to set up a meeting with you or your representatives to discuss this proposed new connection and the need for removal of the spur track. We will be calling you in the next two to three weeks to set a meeting for discussion of this matter. The extension of Wall Street is important to Tigard'.s future transportation plans, and we wish to do everything we can to make it feasible to construct. Mr. Fred Fields, the owner of much of the property over which this street would be constructed, is greatly interested in seeing this link established and is willing to participate in the construction of a portion of the proposed street. We see this interest as an opportunity for the City of Tigard to partner with Mr. Fields and others in 4 funding the construction of this new street. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 5 Q P STIN P. DUENAS, P.E. Ci Engineer c: William A. Monahan, City Manager Fred Fields 1AEng\Gus\Letters\Lettcr to Deering Management Group Regarding Spur Track on Wall Street.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 - - ln9 M9mt.~ Group PHONE NO. 503 2251959 Jan. 24 2003 04:35PM P2 1,06 September 7, 2001 ~g'~ CITY OF TIGARD Walter Rivers mss" Property Manager a SEP ?W? OREGON Deering Management Group, Inc. cMV REC-= IN E C) 4800 SW Macadam Street r' Portland, OR 97201 1 v Dear Mr. Rivers: This is to update you on developments that have occurred since our meeting on August 23, 2001. At its business meeting on August 28, 2001, the Tigard City Council approved the property adjacent to Hall Boulevard (across from O'Mara Street) as the site for the proposed new library. - This is the property owned by Mr. Fred Fields. The Council authorized City staff to pursue an option to purchase the property as the first step towards securing the site for the new library. The new library construction plans will show the primary access to the library coming from Wall Street connecting to Hall Boulevard at the south end of the Fields property. Hence, the segment of the Wall Street Extension that connects to Hall Boulevard will be constructed in conjunction with the new library construction. Enclosed is a drawing showing the preliminary alignment for the Wall Street Extension and the proposed new library site. We hope to hear from you soon regarding your analysis of the importance of the spur track to the Tigard Distribution Center. As I mentioned in my letter of July 23, 2001, and as emphasized in our meeting, the extension of Wall Street from Hunziker Street to Hall Boulevard is important to Tigard's future transportation plans. The removal of the existing spur track along Wall Street is essential for this connection to be made. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, app STIN P. DUENAS, P.E. C Engineer Enclosure c: William A. Monahan, City Manager Margaret Bathes, Library Director Fred Fields t.?-n8\0us\L.ettcrs%tAUer to Dccring Managerncnt Grovp Providing an Update as of 9-7-01.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-41/ TDD (503) 684.2772 LC%VIa1L11 T 01 Klr ® ® ' M ; M ' M Wall Street Extension ~ N ~ N r C WALL STREET EXTENSION KULL BLVD TO l MU= ZIMMI n~euwusei uYOUi 00 - ~omaa,~e • Proposed Site ' Spur Track Tigard - New ' r I 11 r~ ~ r I Library y Yv 1 o C71 1s- 01UWm W1 TO W-41 OEM LL FRO11 Deering Mgmt. Group PHONE NO. : 503 2251959 Jan. 24 2003 03:02PM P2 --g.e- JU c RON D FERGUSON, P.C. Altomey at Law Ron D F Tualatin Paris Offices Facsimile: (503) 691-2694 8555 SW Tualatin Road MAILING ADDRESS. ti0 PO Box 909 PO Box 909 Tualatin, OR 97062 Tualatin OR 97062 (503) 692-5350 C\1 co r, September 27, 2001 ~~6~gl1I91`~~°`~ qaq-~ City of Tigard Coot' Attn: Agustin P. Duenas, PE 13125 SW Nall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Wall Street Extension My client: Tigard Distribution Center Mr. Duenas: As you may recall, I appeared with Mr. Walt Rivers of Deering Management Group at a meeting on August 23. 2001, with yourself ind Mr. Fred Fields; concerning tic %Vall Street extension. I am representing the interests of Klokke Corporation. the owner of the "l iQa,d Distribution Center. In addition to the above-described meeting, I have now received a copy of your September 7, 2001, letter requesting some response out behalf of the Tigard Distribution Center I have consulted with Mr. Rivers of Deering Management Group, Inc., and representatives of Klokke Corporation and I would provide you with the following response. First, and foremost, I want to reiterate a position stated to you at the time of our meeting on August 23, 2001. The Tigard Distribution Center was purchased by my clients and has continued to be operated relying on the fact that this property is served by the railway spw- track. While it is not currently being utilized on a regular basis, it has in the past, and we anticipate that it is extremely likely that perspective future tenants will find this railroad spur extremely L advantageous. It has very real economic value to the property and my client's ownership C interests. At this time, my clients are not interested in releasing their interest to the railway spur and suffering a loss of that economic value. 3 In addition, beyond the simple economic value the railroad spur adds to my client's property, the 3 spur also provides significant benefits to my client's building, its use of the property, and its 9 construction. The preliminary information that I possess suggests that the zoning, access, parking, and fire district access, as well as perhaps setbacks of the construction, might be adversely impacted by the loss of the rail spur which may require significant modification to my client's property at rather substantial costs. Obviously, they do not feel they should bear any of those related costs should they ultimately lose use of the rail spur. When 1 view the overall concept of the Wall Street Extensions, it appears to me that there may be value to the City of Tigard by removing the rail spur and there may be some reduction in the existing traffic patterns if and when the Wall Street extension is concluded. It is not readily FROM: Deering Mgmt. Group PHONE NO. : 503 2251959 Jan. 24 2003 03:03PM P3 Agustin P. Duenas. PF September 27, 2001 Page 2 apparent to me how traffic will be significantly reduced. It does appear to me. however. that there will be very significant economic value to this proposed Wall Street extension to Mr. Fields. The extension appears to make the potential library location, owned by Mr. Fields, much more valuable. in addition, Mr. Fields will then own a great portion of the adjacent property that runs along the newly created and improved Wall Street, which would replace the rail spur. So 1 must confess, it initially appears to me that a request is being made of my clients to "donate" significant economic value to a project which will greatly enhance the benefit of the property owned by other participants in this venture. Personally, l wonder if a similar roadway could not be established adjacent to the existing railway spur located on the property owned by Mr. Fields, and accomplish many of the goals the City seeks to attain. Finally, I understood, at the time of our meeting, that the Wall Street extension is being approached in various phases. 't'here appears to be some regency, especially on behalf of Ivir. 1 Fields, to remove the rail spur and complete and approve a portion of Wall Street in the inlnnediate future. If I understand correctly, there appear to be numerous obstacles, planning and further activity required before construction can occur over the Fanno Creek wetlands towards the west end of the proposed extension. Under no circumstances would my client consider attempting to resolve this matter unless and until complete assurances and approval have been receiyed.guarartteeing a consntiction..of Wall Street to its .anticipated tcrniinus on Hall Blvd. Please understand that my clients are very much interested in working with the City of "l igard and cooperating with Tigard's future goals and plans. If they are to lose a portion of economic benefit of ownership of their property, however, they feel more than justified to demand compensation for that loss. They would also like to insure that the City of Tigard is erecting the best possible plan to improve its transportation system and that if those plans adversely impact the citizens of Tigard that those affected parties equally bare the burden of the proposal. Respectfully, RON D FERGUSON, P.C. r Ron D Ferguson o, RDF:lr d cc: Client 01 u DE ' Hl1J Suite 300 - AGC Center -8d- 9450 SW Commerce Circle x • • Wilsonville, OR. 97070 (503) 682-2450 ssociates, I ilC. (503) 682-4018 Fax 29 X Consu"Enp'neers d Surveyors IWI A- January 17, 2003 Mariann Deering Deering Management Group, Inc. 4800 SW Macadam Avenue, Suite 120 Portland, OR 97201 Re: Wall Street LID Dear Mariann: We are in the process of preparing a Conceptual Engineer's Report related to formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) that would provide a major collector street (Wall Street) connecting Hall Blvd, with Hunziker Street. The project begins at a signalized intersection of Wall Street with Hall Blvd. and extends easterly between the new library site on the North and the proposed Fanno Pointe development on the South, and then northeasterly with a 320ft. bridge crossing Fanno Creek, across the two sets of railroad tracks and along the current Coe Manufacturing Co./Fred Fields access to Hunziker Street. (See attached maps). A railroad spur track falls within the Fred Fields access portion and extends across I lunziker to serve the Hunziker Industrial Park along with property currently leased to Gage Industries. The LID proposes to eliminate the spur track along with the railroad signals at Hunziker. As a part of our conceptual report, we need to generally explain the procedure necessary to eliminate the spur service to the two properties West of Hunziker and approximately what costs may be involved. We are asking your assistance in helping us develop this information. Sincerely, 2 Marlin. DeR99, F.E., P.L.S. President r cc: 02.629.118 ~ Vannie Nguyen - City of Tigard Attachments MJD/lo 6291tr.117 -$er v D HAAS Suite 300 - AGC Center /v e s is r'~ I 1 J 94S0 SW Commerce Circle - " Wilsonville, OR. 97070 1 (503) 682-2450 22V ssociates, Inc. (503) 682-4018 Fax re A Conswmv Engineers d Suiveyots January 17, 2003 Cheryl Bennett Norris, Beggs & Simpson 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 ' Portland, OR 97204 Re: Wall Street LID Dear Cheryl. We are in the process of preparing a Conceptual Engineer's Report related to formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) that would provide a major collector street (Wall Street) connecting Hall Blvd. with Hunziker Street. The project begins at a signalized intersection of Wall Street with Hall Blvd. and extends easterly between the new library site on the North and the proposed Fanno Pointe development on the South, and then northeasterly with a 320ft. bridge e crossing Fanno Creek, across the two sets of railroad tracks and along the current Coe Manufacturing Co./Fred Fields access to Hunziker Street. (See attached maps). A railroad spur track falls within the Fred fields access portion and extends across Hunziker to serve the Hunziker Industrial Park along with property currently leased to Gage Industries. ' The LID proposes to eliminate the spur track along with the railroad signals at Hunziker. As a part of our conceptual report, we need to generally explain the procedure necessary to eliminate the spur service to the two properties West of Hunziker and approximately what costs may be involved. We are asking your assistance in helping us develop this information. Sincerely, 6 / 2 Marli . I~ aas, P.E., P.L.S. n President J Q cc: 02.629.118 j Vannie Nguyen - City of Tigard Attachments MJD/Io 62911r.1 17 121 SW MORRISON STREET, SUITE 200 • PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 PHONE: (503)223.7181 • FAX: (503)273.0256 NORRIS Now America International BEG GS & SIMPSON REALTORS January 22, 2003 Mr. Marlin Dehaas Dehaas & Associates 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 300 Wilsonville, OR 97070 Re: Wall Street LID Dear Marlin: 1 have reviewed the Conceptual Engineer's Report related to the LID for the proposed Wall Street, including the removal of the rail spur serving the area. We are agreeable to the proposed LID provided that the rail spur behind our building is removed in its entirety and the area is graveled and leveled as a part of this project If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call me at 503-273-0384. Sincerely, NORRIS, BEGGS & SIMPSON A Cheryl L. ermett, CPM Property Manager L CLB/mao t: dehaas.doc cc: Blake Hering Wall Street LID File 0 u iYO MORRIS, BEGGS It SIMPSON NORTHWEST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PORTLAND OLIVER VANC• BELLEVUE YOUR PARTNER IN REAL ESTATE SERVICES WORLD MDE LEERING /O 9 GROUP, INC. RECEIVED ,YL1G3 i February 26, 2003 Marlin DeHaas DeHaas & Associates, Inc. 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 300 i Wilsonville, OR 97070 RE: Tigard Distribution Center Rail Spur i Dear Mr. DeHaas: i Thank you for spending the time to explain the proposed project to extend Wall Street from Hall Boulevard to Hunziker Road. i The purchase of Tigard Distribution Center, located at 8001 SW Hunziker Road, was partially based upon the availability of rail service to the site. In the past, there have been several tenants that would not have leased without the rail spur. The owner feels there may be future tenants that would not consider leasing the site unless rail service is available. In addition, we have been informed that removal of the rail spur could create conflicts for the property with respect to parking, zoning and fire equipment access requirements. Finally, removing the spur tracks will further open access behind the building, increasing our exposure to unauthorized traffic and the littering, dumping, tagging and vandalism that goes hand in hand with that traffic. For those reasons, and to reiterate the positions stated in our April 9, 1999 letter to James Hendryx and our attorney's September 27, 2001 letter to Agustin Duenas, the owner of Tigard Distribution Center opposes the removal of the rail spur. If the spur is to be removed over the objection of Tigard Distribution Center, the owner calculates its direct value to the property to be not less than $500,000. Sincerely, DEERING MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. l Walter E. Rivers, CPM Vice President & Broker i F1TDf.Y~nhFSp.'t.0oc MAILING: 4800 S.W. Macadam Ave., Suite 120, Portland, Oregon 97239 (503) 225-1545 Fax (503) 225-1959 8000 NE Parkway, Suite 300, Vancouver, Washington 98662 (360) 260-9993 HANNA, McELnowNEY & ASSOCIATES 8835 S.W. CANYON LANE, Su1TE 405 PORTLAND, OR 97225 (503) 297-9588 Fax: (503) 297-2835 June 9, 2003 Marlin DeHaas DeHaas & Associates Inc. 9450 SW Commerce Circle, x/300 Wilsonville, OR 97070 RE: Wall Street Project, City of Tigard Dear Mr. DeHaas: I have prepared the following report dated June 9, 2003 per your request. The amount of research and investigation has been limited to the scope of work presented in this report. Based on the analysis of the available information it appears that there is little "market" evidence to support the conclusion that a rail spur line contributes to the value of industrial zoned land. Further, it appears that it will be difficult for an appraiser to measure the contributory value of a rail spur other than through the process of estimating either a depreciated cost new value or a salvage value. I am submitting this report for your review. Respectfully submitted, Ma in G. c ldowney 1 J REAL PROPERTY APPRAISAL CONSULTING REPORT PREPARED FOR Marlin DeHaas DeHaas & Associates Inc. 9450 SW Commerce Circle, #1300 Wilsonville, OR 97070 PREPARED BY Marvin G. McEldowney, Consultant Hanna, McEldowney & Associates 8835 S.W. Canyon Lane ##405 Portland, OR 97225 DATE OF REPORT June 9, 2003 Project: Wall Street REAL PROPERTY APPRAISAL CONSULTING REPORT Project: Wall Street Agency: City of Tigard This report was prepared for cost programming purposes only. No real property appraisal has been made of the properties in question. 77te report has been prepared in compliance with the provisions of Standard S of USPAP. Client: DeHaas & Associates Inc. Intended User: DeHaas & Associates Inc., City of Tigard and other possible government agencies. Property Location: Various properties located between Highway 217 and Hall Blvd. at SW Wall Street, Tigard, Oregon, that are served by a railroad spur (see attached map). Problem: To determine if the existence of a railroad spur on industrial zoned land B adds value to the property above and beyond the market value of industrial zoned land without direct rail service. Purpose of Report: To provide a cost estimate for programming/planning purposes for the possible extension of Wall Street which will require the removal of a railroad spur. Date of Report: June 9, 2003 e Scope of Work: Research HMA sales data for industrial land sales with and without railroad spurs; field inspection of property location; consult with Portland area industrial land brokers, Port of Portland personnel, Clackamas and Washington County industrial/commercial appraisers, PNWR rail manager and ODOT rail coordinator. FINDINGS The following question was posed to brokers involved in the marketing, sale and leasing of industrial zoned land: To what extent, if any, does the existence of rail spur service to an industrial site add value above the basic land price? Following are responses to this question: Howard Larson. Norris and Stevens: An industrial broker who occasionally works with clients who need rail service, he does not think rail service adds value to industrial land. Robert Rogers, Robert R. Rogers Co Realtors: Industrial, commercial and warehouse broker who has been involved with the central eastside of Portland for some time. He said that most of the rail in that area has been removed over the years and he cannot recall a single tenant that has moved as a result of it. Jack McConnell Sr. V.P.. Norris Beggs and Simpson: Very few industrial users are e looking for rail service, except in certain heavy industrial areas such as the northwest Portland industrial area. There is very limited demand for rail service in locations such as Tualatin and Tigard. Industrial users that need rail service will locate where it is available, or on rare occasions, they will add a new rail spur line as Wymore Transfer did in Clackamas west of 130th Avenue. Steve Barragar, Broker, Grubb and Ellis Co.: He said it is his opinion that there is no difference in the value of land with or without rail service, although he said he did not have sales information to back up his opinion. The Port of Portland (per Marie Malloy, real estate department) makes no value distinction between industrial land with rail service and land without rail service. They are currently short of industrial land inventory so they are primarily leasing land on long-term contracts (30 to 50 years). These leases reflect the same value for land with or without rail service. See the attached sale/lease memo. The Washington County Assessor's office (per John Hortenstein, industrial appraiser) said they do not value industrial land with a spur at a different rate than industrial land without a rail spur line. He said they add the depreciated spur cost to the land value as a cost basis valuation only. The Clackamas Count Assessor's office (per Dennis Brohgren, industrial and commercial appraiser) similarly treats the value of industrial land with or without rail service the same. A 1 spur line is treated as an improvement that may or may not add value, depending on its utility and condition. The best measure of market value would be a paired sales analysis of similar industrial land parcels with and without rail service. A review was made of HMA in-house industrial land sales but no sales with rail service were found. A similar sales search initiated with various sales data sources (Comps, RMLS, Metroscan) also yielded no results. CONCLUSION We have found no evidence to indicate that the existence of a railroad spur on industrial zoned land adds value to the property above and beyond the market value of industrial zoned land without rail service. To the contrary, statements from industrial land brokers as well as the Port of Portland indicate that there is no measurable difference in value. The best market evidence is the attached Port of Portland memo dated June 5, 2003, wherein rail served property was leased at the same unit value as the sale of property without rail service. However, a case might be made that rail service contributes value as an "improvement" to a parcel of land. Similar to the approach taken by appraiser's in the Assessor's office in Washington and Clackamas County, the estimated depreciated cost would be the basis for value. At the very least, a rail spur has a salvage value for the tracks, ties, spikes, plates, switch and r ballast. It is anticipated that an appraiser would value the spur somewhere between the depreciated cost basis of the spur track and the salvage value, but not less than the latter. r We are aware of no new industrial parks where rail service has been constructed on speculation r that there will be future demand for such service. Users who require rail service are more likely to select industrial properties located close to a rail line and construct a spur line as needed. This may be a reflection of changes in the transportation system that relies more heavily on air r and container shipping today and less on on-site rail service. r CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTANT I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: r • the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. r • the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limited conditions, and are my personal, impartial and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, conclusion and recommendations. r • I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. r • I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. r • my engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting r predetermined results. • my compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, r the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. • my analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, ~r in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. i • I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. s • no one provided real property appraisal or appraisal consulting assistance to the person r signing this certification. Date Marvin G. McEldowney ##C000192 Oregon State Certified General Appraiser r Transportation • Structural - Civil • Surveying • Inspection - Environmental CONCEPTUAL REPORT FOR FANNO CREEK (WALL STREET) BRIDGE CITY OF TIGARD e Introduction This report addresses the new bridge crossing of Fanno Creek as part of the roadway project that connects S. W. I lunziker Street to S. W. Hall Boulevard via S. W. Wall Street. Wall Street is currently 1/3 mile long and runs between Hunziker and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks. This project will improve the existing roadway section and then extend Wall Street southwest across the railroad tracks and Fanno Creek connecting to Hall Boulevard. An at-grade crossing is anticipated for the railroad tracks, and no existing bridge is present at the Fanno Creek crossing location. The recommendations contained herein are based on preliminary studies by OBEC Consulting Engineers with support from DeHaas and Associates for surveying and alignments, and geotechnical input from Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Design Criteria It is the intent of this design to construct a new seismically resistant bridge similar to the recent City of Tigard bridge projects at Grant Avenue and Tiedeman Avenue. The new roadway will include 12' travel lanes and 6' bike paths with 6' raised sidewalks on each side of centerline. The bridge will be designed for HS-20 loading according to the current American Association of State and Highway Officials (AASHTO) standards. The design will include 2" of asphalt wearing surface with an allowance of 2" for future asphalt. The new structure will be designed for a site peak acceleration of 0.2g based on current ODOT seismic hazard map. Foundation Investigation A preliminary geotechnical evaluation based on literature research and past experience with similar projects was performed by Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Their recommendations for the bridge indicated deep pile foundations driven into the Troudale Formation and Sandy River Prludstone equivalent. We anticipate that the piles will be either 14" or 16" closed-end pipe piles driven to bearing capacities of 80 to 90 tons and depths of 75' to 100'. Because of limited geotechnical information at this time, we have used 80' lengths and 16" pipe piling for cost EUGENE estimating purposes. (541)683-6090 g pure FAX (541) 683.6576 920 Country Club Road, 5wte 1008 Eugene, Oregon 974012206 MEDFORD (5011774.5590 Conceptual Report for Fanno Creek (Wall Street) Bridge FAX (541) 774-5591 Page I 1335 Poplar Drive Medford, Oregon 97501.5107 www.obec.com GU15U1I116 110111 R S Hydraulic Investigation The proposed road crosses Fanno Creek approximately 3.7 miles upstream from its o confluence with the Tualatin River. The proposed bridge site is located in Zone AE as delineated on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the City of Tigard, Oregon, Washington County, Map Number 410276000313, effective date March 1, 1982. The proposed road crosses Fanno Creek at approximately cross section "IT' from the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for the City of Tigard, Oregon, Washington County dated September 1, 1981. The FIS states the regulated floodway width for Fanno Creek at this section is 320 feet wide with a regulatory water surface elevation for the base flood of 141.1 feet based on the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). This preliminary study summarizes the results of a hydraulic analysis conducted to determine the effects the proposed bridge would have on the base flood elevations in order to comply with the Code of Federal Regulations 44 CFR 60.3 and the City of ' Tigard Land Development Code. Federal Regulation 44 CFR 60.3 section d.2 requires that any encroachment into the regulated floodway must result in a 0.00 (no rise) increase to the base flood elevations. IIEC-RAS Version 2.2, September 1998, was used to analyze the hydraulic conditions at the proposed bridge site. The hydrology used for this study is based on flows obtained from the FIS for Fanno Creek. 'File design flood for the proposed project is the 100-year event. Two models were developed for the bridge site: a natural condition model to represent the natural condition before any structures are built and a proposed condition model that represents the proposed bridge. All of the models were developed from a topographic survey completed by DeHaas and Associates. Several options were analyzed for the proposed condition model to identify a bridge that would comply with the "no rise" requirement established by Federal regulations. The analysis started with an 80-foot-long single-span increasing up to a 120-foot-long single- span bridge. All these single-span structures resulted in a rise in the base flood elevation. Extensive channel modifications were investigated with the 120-foot-long single-span but this also resulted in a rise in the base flood elevation. After numerous iterations, analysis showed that a multi-span bridge that spans the 320-foot floodway was the only option that would comply with the "no rise" requirement. This bridge option did require some berm removal on the west side of the main channel to offset the backwater caused by the interior bents of the bridge. 1 0 3 ' There has been some discussion regarding encroachment within the regulatory floodway as an option, thereby alloMng a shorter bridge. The only way to change the regulated floodway and the base flood elevations adopted by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is to apply to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). The CLOMR is submitted to FEMA for review to determine if the project complies with the minimum floodplain management Conceptual Report for Fanno Creek (Wall Street) Bridge Page 2 U ' MSUHING ~ tN61NIIRS criteria. This process can be used to get approval from FEMA to revise the base elevations and or floodway which could allow for a shorter bridge. However, this process could take up to a year which may or may not get approval and would require an extensive hydrologic and hydraulic analysis to determine the new base flood elevations and floodway that would need to be submitted with the CLOMR. This level of hydraulic analysis would require a copy of the original I-IEC-2 model used to develop the FIS from FEMA and additional survey data to be obtained for Fanno Creek. The existing survey data would need to be expanded to include Fanno Creek and its floodplain from the bridge crossing at S.W. Hall Blvd on the upstream side of the proposed bridge to 2000 feet below the proposed bridge on the downstream side. The original HEC-2 model would be modified with the survey data to create a new base model that would be used to determine the new base flood elevations for the proposed structure. The results of the analysis must show that the combined effects do not increase ' the base flood elevations "with floodway" by more than what is shown in the FIS. In this case at Section "H" the increase is 0.6 feet. A CLOMR could then be submitted to FEMA for approval with the appropriate review fees included. The submittal would include a topograhic map delineating the new base flood elevations and floodway; a statement that the City of Tigard has notified all the affected property owners of the proposed impacts to properties upstream and downstream; and a copy of the adoption of the new base flood elevations and floodway by the city of Tigard. Joe Weber from the Region 10 Office of FEMA was contacted on December 12, 2002, for verification of the procedure stated above. Our recommendation at this time is lix a bridge consisting of four 80 foot spans that utilize prestressed slabs totaling 320 feet. This bridge will comply with the "no rise" 1 requirement established by current Federal regulations and the City of Tigard Land Development Code. Further investigation into revising the regulatory floodway is beyond the scope of this preliminary report. Permits Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands fill/removal permits will likely be required at this site. We also anticipate a City of Tigard Sensitive Lands Permit for the approach embankment encroachment into the 100-year flood plain. Any encroachment volume into the 100-year flood plain will need to be mitigated with an equal volume of C removal somewhere near the site according to Chapter 3 section 13(c) of the Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards. 3 Because this is a new crossing, DSL requires an easement with legal description for any new structures above "waters of the state" according to OAR 141-65. Additional > environmental issues will be addressed by Pacific Habitat Services. Conceptual Report for Fanno Creek (Wall Street) Bridge Page 3 .1 crrsurrrrs e MUMS Proposed Bridge The proposed bridge is a 320-foot-long bridge consisting of four 80-foot-long spans comprised of twelve 30-inch-deep by 4-feet-wide prestressed concrete slabs (Figure 1). The typical bridge section consists of two 12'-0" travel lanes with two 6'-0" bike lanes for a total roadway width of 36'-0". There will also be a 6'-0" sidewalk on each side to match the approach sidewalk. At the west end, the bridge will be flared to a roadway width of 43'-61/4" to match the required taper for the additional turn lane at Hall Boulevard. This will require adding a cast-in-place concrete flared section to the prestressed slabs. We recommend that 20 foot reinforced concrete end panels be constructed at each end of the new bridge. We feel this would be an effective measure to minimize potential differential settlement at the bridge ends where up to 10 feet of embankment will be placed. The bridge rail recommended is the same as that used on the recent Grant Avenue and Tiedeman Avenue bridges. It consists of a concrete parapet with a steel pedestrian rail mounted on top that is 4'-6" above the sidewalk elevation (ODOT Standard Drawing BR250). The preliminary construction cost estimate for the bridge only is $1,156,700, including contingencies (Figure 2). i i i i i Conceptual Report for Fanno Creek (Wall Street) Bridge Page 4 1 ~o 320=0'c1r.-c1i endbenls 12- 24'x4 =0"precasl prestressed slobs ea'Spcn 80'-0" 80-0' 80-0' 80-0" '£levations shown are n (inish grade a! CL benls Profile grode Il~dl, o Span 1 o Spat 2 o Span 3 $ SPA 4 olh P CL roadway b e p of a o m -aol2ez n Of I'D eh Proposed ¢ y structure I III ,I i~ f ' L 144.8 0 3 GRADELINE DIAGRAM b a b 3 'El. 14&92 N87-40'14W m o 0 o NO SCALE aQJECT I I I I h ~ ~ ` I I I I it ~ CL roadway TY1, h 55-2 "Irper, t t 8-0" SEC. I, T. 2 S. R I W., WM wingwoll lyp.' 51d 20-4"bridge fyp ea side, end pail ea end this end PLAN LOCATION MAP NO SCALE 1'- 6D' Pedestrian roil CC bent sidewalk mounted concrete pwopel CL Bent 1 CL Bent 2 CL Bent 3 CL Bent 4 CL Bent 5 1 336-0" edeslriao rail ea side T-n Mau Pedeslrirn rail on sidewalk moaaled concrete pcrrpel Fractured fin !60 /finish q) * - : [ 150. Sidewalk 140 L5$ tYP o l3D PP/ 0375 sleet Existing ground Ike p wide 0 pipe pile, /),p 1=6" 120 bike slab NO Remove berm 100 yr. flood P roadway CL , W £l. 141.1 \ 100 olh Est tip f!. 650, !yp ELEVATION Finish -60 grade Wingwoll CL roadway 50-0"I out-out 1-0" 6-0' 3610" 6-0, 1-0, I A rail s/w Pedeslrimro!l roadway s/w roil WINGWALL DETAIL sidewalk mounted 12- 2-6'x4-O'precosl co,urelepcrgdel prestressed concrete slabs, typ 2"ndvn ACWS Sl. 2% Sl. 2R r 910a7EMAEClUBM0.W SlrlE IGe ,t ii;. t'.'•' 1 CONSUL17NG EUGEtir,axda+ernl m - ',~~~JJ,,..• •e ,•rvy: ENGINEERS mR49: rAu61gm3t5A W aEV. DESCRIPTION BY OAIE r~ r~ r-I r~ n ri n r~ PPI&O..375 FANNO CR. (YdALL ST.) BRIDGE • steel pipe , ple, lyp. TIGARO OREGON TYPICAL DECK SECTION TYPE, SIZE 8 LOCATION - 1 oczdaa Coyle 0 Able , P. IF Eedi Na 604-1sm. 1 OF 1 auxH RDC a" .'FILEEa DATELCC20,? 12//2102 0&39h.IPROXCTS16G41RT001ICAGIAC4DI'm16000191_00rsowt Figure 1 FIGURE 2 Fanno Creek (Wall Street) Bridge City of Tigard 320' Bridge Preliminary Cost Estimate December 13, 2002 Spec Item No. No. Item Bid Unit Est. Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION 00210 10 Mobilization Lump Sum Lump Sum All Lump Sum $ 95,600 BRIDGES 00510 20 Shoring d Cribbing Lump Sum Lump Sum All Lump Sum $ 2,000 00510 30 Strocture Excavation Lump Sum CY 120 $ 20.00 S 2,400 00510 40 Granular Structure Backfill Lump Sum CY 40 $ 25.00 S 1,000 00520 50 Furnish Pile Driving Equipment Lump Sum Lump Sum Ali Lump Sum S 20,000 00520 60 Furnish 16' Pipe Piles LF LF 3,200 S 20.00 $ 64,000 00520 70 Drive 16' Pipe Piles Each Each 40 $ 300.00 S 12,000 00520 80 Pile Splice, 18' Piles Each Each 40 S 200.00 $ 8,000 00530 90 Reinloroement Lump Sum Ibs 33,360 S 0.55 $ 18,300 00540 100 Structural Concrete, Class 25 (1) Lump Sum CY 278 S 300.00 $ 63,400 00550 110 30' Precast Prestressed Slabs Each Each 48 $ 12,500.00 S 600,000 00583 120 W Reinforced Corvxete End Panels SY SY 214 $ 135.00 $ 28,900 00587 130 Concrete Parapet with Pedestrian Rail LF LF 672.0 S 130.00 S 87,400 00591 140 Membrane Waterproofing SY SY 1303 $ 15 00 S 19,500 $ 946,900.00 WEARING SURFACES 00741 150 Asphalt Concrete Pavement (2) tons torts 150 $ 60.00 $ 9,000 SUBTOTAL OF ITEMS S 1,051,500 Contingencies Q I VW S 105.200 Construction Engineering Q 1 OW S 105,200 TOTAL PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE (3): S 1,261,900 (1)Quantity Includes BrkVe d End Panel sidewalks (2) Ouantity includes Bridge and End Panels (3) Bridge Only - toes not include TP&DT, Erosion Control, or Seeding L 'C e . NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Modify Tigard Comprehensive Plan and Wetland and Stream Corridor Map Monday November 10, 2003 Tigard Water Building Auditorium 8777 SW Burnham Street 6:30PM - 8:OOPM AGENDA 1. Introduction of Staff & Reading of Statement of Meeting Purpose 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process 3. Existing Conditions of Sensitive Lands (Pinebrook Creek, wetlands and ponds) 4. Brief Discussion of Proposed Wall Street Project 5. Brief Discussion of Proposed Reconfiguration of Pinebrook Creek and ponds 6. Questions and Comments 7. Wrap Up - Request attendees to sign the sign-up sheet C MINDOWSWemporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\OSJBU2D7\nov10 neighborhood meeting agenda.doc a 0 MINUTES NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Modify Tigard Comprehensive Plan and Wetland and Stream Corridor Map A Monday November 10, 2003 Tigard Water Building Auditorium 8777 SW Burnham Street 6:30PM - 8:OOPM The neighborhood meeting was convened at the time and location above. The agenda followed is enumerated below. 1. Introduction of Staff & Reading of Statement of Meeting Purpose 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process 3. Existing Conditions of Sensitive Lands (Pinebrook Creek, wetlands and ponds) 4. Brief Discussion of Proposed Wall Street Project 5. Brief Discussion of Proposed Reconfiguration of Pinebrook Creek and ponds 6. Questions and Comments 7. Wrap Up - Request attendees to sign the sign-up sheet The meeting was conducted by Fishman Environmental Services (FES) representing the applicant for the project, the City of Tigard Engineering Department. Also in attendance were Marlin DeHaas of DeHaas and Associates and Vannie Nguyen and Gus Duenas of the City of Tigard Engineering Department. Stacy Benjamin, Paul Fishman and Dan Stark of FES spoke to each of the agenda items above, with Paul Fishman facilitating the meeting and the question and comment period. The meeting'began promptly at 6:30 and continued until 7:50, whereupon Paul Fishman adjourned the meeting to allow time for attendees to view the display boards and ask additional questions in a more informal setting. Twelve interested parties came to the meeting, and all signed the sign-in sheet. Meeting attendees and their addresses are listed below. Questions and comments received at the meeting are summarized on the following pages. Tom Whittaker, 621 SW Morrison St., #125, Portland, OR 97205, (503) 228-7571 Joel Shaich, 7707 SW Locust St., Portland, OR 97223, (503) 238-5942 Sue Beilke, 11755 SW 114`h Pl., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-3519 Naomi Gallucci, 11285 SW 78`h Ave., Tigard, OR 97223 Alice & Ron Ellis Gaut, 10947 SW Chateau Ln., Tigard, OR 97224, (503) 639-8930 E. Solis, no address given Brian Wegener, 9830 SW Kimberly Dr., Tigard, OR 97224, (503) 639-7791 Bill Iron & Kathy Meads, 9780 SW Ventura Ct., Tigard, OR 97223, (503) 246-2215 John Frewing, 7110 SW Lola Ln., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 249-5760 Charles Colling, 13835 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223, (503) 620-7344 C:\WINDOWSWemporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\M23SFFCM\nov10 neighborhood meeting minutes.doc Comprehensive Plan Amendment Meeting, November 10, 2003 - Public Comments Attendee Question/Comment Joel Shaich (PAF) Was ESEE used for the original Comp. Plan? (SNB) Was original inventory and sensitive lands overlay done using ESEE process? Sue Beilke Why are we doing a Comp. Plan review for this rather than doing the whole city? This will cost a lot of money. Joel Shaich Is the purpose of the Comp. Plan amendment for this project just to allow wetland impacts due to road project? Joel Shaich On the display map, is the red showing the proposed street alignment? Sue Beilke Is this only being done because of Wall Street? John Frewing (PAF) Is this part of the engineering already done? (SNB) Is this work related to the engineering work that the City did to bring Wall Street project from 20% to 60% completion in Dec. to Jan.? Ron Ellis Gaut Who will conduct the ESEE process? What does it involve? Brian Wegener What is Pinebrook like during high flow conditions? Brian Wegener Is there any indication that this project is more feasible that when proposed last December? RR crossing? John Frewing Is the noxious plant occurrence typical or not for Fanno Creek? Kathy Meads What kind of wildlife will be affected? • Charles Coiling (Lives across Hall along Pinebrook Creek) Has put out duck nesting boxes and has seen more than 100 ducklings. Lower ponds are important for ducklings. He has a pond, always a trickle of water, even in summer. William Iron Is this the only answer, rather than cleaning up the ponds? Ron Ellis Gaut Regarding the ESEE process: to whom are impacts directed? i.e. e economic impact to land owners, City wide, etc. ! Zoned industrial land will increase in value - are there other ways to access these properties? Q Alice Ellis Gaut What is the relationship in ESEE to Metro's Goal 5 overlay? How does Tigard's decision come into harmony or conflict with these? Should Tigard look at preserving open space? What is the timeframe and can 1 public do their own ESEE? Sue Beilke Impacts to wildlife from development are often overlooked. Any development will cause some species to stop using the area. Proposed project will be a "monumental impact" to this area. C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\M23SFFCM\nov10 neighborhood meeting minutes.doc Sue Beilke Both ponds have waterfowl use, including wood duck pairs and migratory songbirds. Suggest taking ponds off-line, would prefer that ponds remain, enhance with native plantings, and allow turtles, red- legged fro s, and birds to use the pond. John Frewing Concerned about relying on the North Pond for wildlife habitat - the Fanno Creek Trail is proposed to go near the pond, would prefer to see alternative locations for the trail and keep trails away from the pond. What assumptions are being made about long-term maintenance? Le. invasive species control, etc? Tigard has 7 acres/1000 persons of open space. Parks vision is 11 acres/1000 persons; national standard is 18 acres/1000 persons. Sue Bielke Where will the Fanno Creek Trait be located on the Fanno Pointe site ' Charles Coiling What kinds of fish? Ponds could be holding areas. Ron Ellis Gaut Forest area (existing) identified as wildlife habitat and is designated as Industrial land. Will ESEE take this into consideration as an impact? Brian Wegener Is alternatives analysis for 404 permit? Kathy Meads Two things going on: revitalization of ponds, etc., and extension of Wall street. Who is paying for the studies currently being done? Will the City be reimbursed for the studies being done for Phase 1 if the entire Wall Street project is built? John Frewing Timing: does not seem to match Gus's schedule of reporting to Council on feasibility. 1 C:\WINDOWSWemporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\M23SFFCM\novl0 neighborhood meeting minutes.doc OF MWPVRT0A0 rdth ® TION FOR ® ® APPLIGA APPROACH accdmpen thisoform. d,rter,n that Brs concurrence must ~R,p,ete only , i. AS H'GHW AY of the ProPB ation the apd'c3nl S evidence oowner Inform „ F,~T NAME T District Oftice' A Tax Lot MOP e tax en lot 00300 r u5T NA1AE documents and submitLoca~on Information vi • of IS. fete this form, attach au nt~cessON npO~jpERTY e u T i and n c MPAW INSTRUCTlot Comp r AaoeESS a coutm q 1icant inform ton. >eSTREET ADDRESS STATE ■ cECT NAME RANGE 2 „ HNC AOORESs nTNSH,c P lW If T MAP TAXlO NUAtBERISt Rpt7TE s STATE y 23P CODE s utY 141 Sit a cirr NAME Hi 11Taa attAnONALI% xFAXNUMBER WAY tin 'sTt~ AotsFtE 1 1 No » r y r n s1oB OF tuer+wAYT 61E O V4 ❑ Yes PHONE NUMBER _ suutstto AGGRESS OW11 POIN r C3N 0S 5.88 Wall Street r SLATE ` 9ZIP 73 1 t~or th of ~ „ EMAIL AOORE55 ~prr et (365 N M of uo:s sweat and dista i and Ax NUMBER nce V4 d~xlion T OR F Qcnara Stre » F AX NUMBER ~PtioNENUMBER 684 -2772 W66I ) d NSkdamst0nd,a,atx.,u) „~oNENUMBER ~+=0752 (503)639-4171 (503 us Local GovernmenAformatton 503 639-4171 503 62 e ci.ti ard.or. 4LOCALGOVE N'Ti and »ErwLADDREss vanni City Nand TITLE OOVERNMENT CONTACT PERSO En ineer pro a Information Use of Approach LOCAL Cit ❑ Chang Gus Duenas co sed a APPU~TION REWEST l`' FOR T EMNt de a sketch of the Q Po Approach A roach v LOCULGO NER_igard us ®New AFP ❑ Tem OR '°r' orate sheet to Pro"' oWi gt15@Ci' tig Include to eareno foods 10 C3 A roach S4. Ft. of . this sheet or attach a sUto be to scale. i an~ to nearest approach ~a Existin p Retail v use the back The sketch is not It Location and d st S4 s. on both vdes of the tvgtMNaY. eto men, site a~• rest yr ppaOAptlost RVE Un1iS and 6rec4on to the r" the propertie Ft. develO locate" minimum or 500 ft. h dashed'nes. Residential p Medical Name, denote VA 13 S Ft. landmark ~ shoes,; " denote ~d ~s Ines Existing approa,_ denote w th dashed Ines q Rooms propos roachf a with Existing budding " en, Office p Lodging - . Proposed bug-gs - ttw propel H way edge of pavem Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. . Local streets or roads abutting ,,cation has Institutional IndusVIA96cu , Arrow indicating Nora' Ice ,Hitt contact you When your app vti0 be ❑ p Acres The OD~T O~sinct ntI e the apohcetiOn pt~ess ~ need onal 0 Other YyEN cLE rR P5 PLICANT ited to co it vA1l be ssued p Recreati _ CION f wnal moments are reQU nsttuctwn vem, p, bond andlor insurance _m J tJ"e "tA~ EsT,MATEOOUI NOTIFI AT Wall L been reviewed ~ gon is approved. a ce the DisU office. ce . int ormaiiotn, see OAR ® Public Street THE PR~RTY AND RETURNING 7 000 If your completed a sgn it, and return It to pp Trips? NOTE: LEAVING ,LS F note~ Ae the ~VUcbon permiL ete desarnD~n and a Vehicle n/ a (in to jvievN For a Como 0 Yes ~ No Use L._-~11 may be required at that time. OW OeNatan 40 what IS COW are the 0ERE0 TWO TWO T B edPS Daily R CON Perm'+ CherJt Number S~ Chapter 734 Di ~10n~ Q Yes t] No Amount and! oraPProvan 11 so. fist the conditional goes This require a;ocai use review Der try} Major OeNation Reteitred DateChad Number Number Of Local Land Use Case Number i Rese to rved Amount Administr live Fee roach fee a what is the current land use zodn9 of the propa~ n /a APP UNDER PENALTY D Ralundabk Temporary CERTtFiES AND AFFIRMS TtON PRO ~ RUE dine properNT ® No RES, L ~yVS THAT ALL INFORMA FEDERA KNOWLEDGE HE BEST OF HIS/HER u What is the propped land use 204 nts on or to the Property? It O Yes THE APPLICANT DECIA aasame APPLICABLE STATE OACHMFNTS ARE TO T Date u Goes the property ha of the recordeasement(s) Yes M d photocopy p NO THIS FORM AND f yes, attach a Ah adjacent Ptopertiss7 No AND COMPLETE ~ 6can! Q- t.~.r► ~ s of the 90-colslONlners hate interests in the ~ Yes Signature otAPP 10/1110 0o any No border this property? 0 Yes y Do other streets or roads bond Road Pamtii? a Is there an existing oDOT Approach 734.2495 CWA A's (4100) APO'Otlon =111 SHANNOAND N MMLSON, INC 2255 S.W. CanyonRoad Portland, Oregon 97201-2498 MEMORANDUM 503.223.6147 Fax: 503.223.6140 TO: Marlin J. DeHaas, P.E., P.L.S. COMPANY: DeHaas & Associates, Inc. FROM: K. Frank Fujitani, PE./N977- -COPY TO: Gayle D. Harley, P.E., OBEC DATE: September 27, 2002 PROJECT: Wall Street LID Il Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Marlin: This memorandum presents our preliminary geotechnical evaluation for the Wall Street LID project. The purpose of the evaluation is to provide preliminary geotechnical data sufficient for the 35% design cost estimates. The preliminary evaluation is based on subsurface conditions at the site characterized from a literature search and past experience for similar projects with simil,4 geologic site conditions. No subsurface explorations were made for this evaluation. GEOLOGY AND ANTICIPATED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Based on published geology for the area (Madin, 1990), the subsurface conditions at the site are a anticipated to consist of the fine grained phase of sediments deposited by a series of catastrophic floods during the late Pleistocene that resulted from repeated breaching of ice dams impounding glacial Lake Missoula. The fine grained phase consists generally of sand and silt, and based on Madin's (1990) mapping, the fine grained flood deposits are estimated to be about 60 feet thick. 0 Recent alluvium consisting of sand, silt and clay, possibly organic, is anticipated to be present 0 A a within the flood plain of Fanno Creek. Below the fine grained flood deposits, siltstone,.claystone and fine sandstone generally in the form of very stiff to hard silts, clayey silts and clays are present that have been named the Troutdale Formation and Sandy River Mudstone equivalent. 1WAL11sharedllproject\320013206.01 Wall St.LID\Mmd0l.doc 24-1-03206-001 oil, Memorandum to Marlin J. DeHaas September 27, 2002 Page 2 Past experience indicates that the groundwater in the project area fluctuates with the seasons of the year, being highest during the late winter and early spring and lowest during the late summer and early fall. The groundwater may fluctuate by up to 10 feet or more and may be near the ground surface during periods of heavy rainfall. The logs of two borings made by Geocon Northwest for the new Tigard Library site north of the west end of the proposed Wall Street alignment were reviewed. These borings generally encountered similar soils consisting of brown, silty fine sand and sandy silt to a depth of about 24.5 feet where very stiff gray silt was present to a depth of about 34.5 feet. Medium stiff gray silty clay was then encountered overlying dense sand to fine gravel at a depth of about 46 feet. Very stiff to hard gray sandy silt was then encountered at a depth of about 49 feet, and the borings were terminated in this unit at a depth of 51.5 feet. Groundwater was measured in one of the borings at a depth of approximately 9 feet. We interpret the very stiff to hard gray sandy silt as being part of the Troutdale Formation and Sandy River Mudstone equivalent. OBEC Consulting Engineers also provided us with the Foundation Data sheets for two small bridges they designed. These bridges cross Fanno Creek upstream of the site at Grant and Tiedeman Avenues in Tigard. At the Grant Avenue Bridge, soft to medium stiff sandy silt was encountered to a depth of about 36 feet where very stiff to hard silt was encountered to the bottom of the borings at a depth of about 75 feet. Similar conditions were encountered at the Tiedeman Avenue Bridge except that the very stiff to hard silt was encountered at a depth of about 46 feet. We interpret the very stiff to hard silt as being part of the Troutdale Formation 1 and Sandy River Mudstone equivalent. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Earthwork and Embankments i Earthwork for this project will primarily involve cutting and filling along the roadway alignment and preparation of the pavement sub ade. The soils at the site are fine l~' grained and moisture i sensitive so that earthwork operations should be limited to the drier summer months between 1 about mid June to mid October. Moisture contents of the in-place soils are probably above the optimum for compaction, and if the native soils are to be used in embankment fills, they may 24-1-03206-001 Memorandum to Marlin J. DeHaas September 27, 2002 Page 3 need to be dried by tilling or disking. If construction cannot be scheduled for the summer months, imported clean granular fill will be required. Where embankment fills are to be placed, the area under the fill should be stripped of topsoil and any organic materials. For estimating purposes, assume 9 inches. The stripped area should be proof rolled to re-compact loosened soil and to detect any excessively soft areas that would need to be removed. Tree stumps should be removed, and the resulting depression smoothed and backfilled with compacted soil. Embankment slopes and cut slopes should be designed on a preliminary basis at the rate of 2 horizontal to 1 vertical. Settlement of the embankments should also be anticipated. The amount of settlement will depend on the height of embankment and subsurface soil conditions. For estimating purposes, assume that the embankment will settle about an inch for every 10 feet of fill height. Most of the settlement will occur as the fill is placed and over a period of about 30 to ' 60 days. Settlement of the embankments at the approaches to the railroad crossing may impact the grade of the tracks. Pavement Design At the present time, there is insufficient data to provide a preliminary pavement section, and the City of Tigard pavement design standards require a design section if the street is classified as an arterial. However, the City of Tigard standard design section for a major collector, minor collector, or a local street is the same, consisting of 4 inches of asphaltic concrete over 3 inches of 3/4-inch minus leveling course over 12 inches of 2-inch minus base course. For cost A estimating purposes, we recommend that the standard City of Tigard pavement section be used. During final design, the pavements may be increased or reduced as the subgrade strength warrants. i For the replacement of the existing Wall Street pavement, our experience is that the subgrade under the pavement becomes saturated with time. As a result, compaction of the saturated subgrade will be difficult and will require drying and/or over-excavation and backfilling with compacted granular fill. 24-1-03206-001 Memorandum to Marlin J. DeHaas September 27, 2002 Page 4 1 Bridge Foundations The new bridge across Fanno Creek will be supported on pile foundations. Our experience is that the piles will need to extend into the Troutdale Formation and Sandy River Mudstone equivalent, and based on our review, the Troutdale Formation and Sandy River Mudstone should be present at a depths of about 40 to 60 feet. The penetration of the piles into the Troutdale Formation and Sandy River Mudstone equivalent is dependent on the pile type and design load on the pile. Generally, specifications require the piles to be driven a minimum of about 5 feet of penetration into the Troutdale Formation and Sandy River Mudstone equivalent. Once this minimum penetration is achieved, the piles are then driven to a resistance determined by a suitable pile driving formula. Usually ODOT specifications are specified which requires the use of the Gates equation except that the Wave equation analysis is required for design loads over 91 tons and for double acting and differential hammers. We provided the geotechnical investigation and recommendations for the light rail bridges for the Hillsboro Extension of the Westside Light Rail Project. Those bridges were supported on 12- 3/4-inch diameter pipe piles that were driven closed ended. Design pile capacities were in the range of 50 to 60 tons, and pile penetrations into the Troutdale Formation and Sandy River Mudstone equivalent were on the order of 30 to 40 feet, respectively. At the Grant Avenue Bridge, the piles consisted of 14-inch diameter pipe piles driven closed ended with an ultimate load of 175 tons and a design load of 58 tons. These piles were driven to an average penetration depth of about 75 feet with an estimated penetration of about 35 feet into the Troutdale Formation and Sandy River Mudstone equivalent. At the Tiedeman Avenue Bridge, the piles consisted of 18-inch diameter pipe piles driven closed ended with an ultimate load of 150 tons and a design load of 50 tons. These piles were driven to an average penetration depth of about 98 feet with an estimated penetration of about 45 feet into .i o the Troutdale Formation and Sandy River Mudstone equivalent. J J For preliminary design, we recommend assuming that the Troutdale Formation and Sandy River 'r Mudstone equivalent is at a depth of 60 feet and that the piles will penetrate 40 feet into the Troutdale Formation and Sandy River Mudstone equivalent. 24-1-03206-001 Memorandum to Marlin J. DeHaas September 27, 2002 Page 5 Retaining Structures Where retaining walls are required, they should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures. The lateral pressure will depend on the ability of the walls to yield. Conventional retaining walls should be designed for an equivalent fluid weighing 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for a granular backfill, which we recommend. Non-yielding walls should be designed for an equivalent fluid weighing 45 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). These values assume that the wall is properly drained to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressures and that the back slope is horizontal. If the back slope is not horizontal and slopes upward, the lateral loads can become significantly greater. If mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining walls are used, they may be designed for a soil having a unit weight of 110 pounds per cubic foot, an angle of internal friction of 30 degrees with no cohesion. The allowable soil bearing pressure at the toe of the wall should be limited to 1,500 pounds per square foot. REFERENCES CITED Madin, I.P., 1990, Earthquake-Hazard Geology Maps of the Portland Metropolitan Area, Oregon: Text and Map Explanation, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report 0-90-2. r L' . C h a i 24-1-03206-001 AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF 3 -23 - D CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL, AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUEIAGENDA TITLE Review of Police Youth Programs PREPARED BY: Sheryl Huiras~ DEPT HEAD OK JA~2 CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Hear and review police youth programs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION No action requested: presentation of information only. INFORMATION SUMMARY The School Resource Officer (SRO) program provides many valuable services for our youth, the schools and our community. Through educational programs such as DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education), positive interactions with students we are working on a proactive approach to law enforcement. The SRO also provides the response for the emergency and criminal incidents that occur within our schools (a community within a community) of 7,366 students. They are responsible for the safety and security of the students, staff and school. The Youth Services Officer (YSO) is a non-sworn position who works with youth, the community and local schools. Tigard Police through the SRO's and YSO provide many youth programs that benefit our youth and the community. Some of these important programs include: DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) Classes: The purpose of this program is to provide youth with the tools necessary to resist drugs and violence. This program is taught to 6 grade schools, over 850 fifth grade students. GREAT (Gang Resistance Education & Training): The program is taught in both middle schools to 60' and 7a' grade students. This reinforces the DARE Message and gives them education on gangs and violence. We have taught over 920 students this year. DARE to be GREAT Summer Camp: Provides students with an opportunity to enhance their social skills; make youth aware of alternatives to drug and gang involvement; increase positive relationships with adults and youth; build self-esteem and confidence; encourage community service; and provide opportunities for social, cognitive and interpersonal growth. Peer Court: Provides a second chance for young people who have made an error in judgment, accept responsibility and get them back on the right track to be law abiding citizens. Women's self-defense classes Teaches women self-defense techniques to keep them safe from sexual assault. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Schools and Education - Goal #1: Schools, city government, and other service providers, successfully work together to provide a community based recreation activity program for young people. Strategy #1: Identify community resources for supporting/providing recreation and activity program for young people. ATTACFB4ENT LIST PowerPoint presentation FISCAL NOTES The cost for 5 different camps, 1 week long each, is $21,000.00 i ® A13 (S • n"z o DRUGS lD VII ent lessons, each lesson students. 'den differ Tau ht to 5th grade g X45 mutes violenCe~ Assertiveness, is ~ youth and Decision Niaking Ways to say n0 ' • Self esteem, conflict Resolution, schools. s, Stress, a116 Consequence imately 850 students 'n h ear we teach approx de Eac y s with the stu • positive relationship Building nts. . z 0 0 w <c 0 4 ...4: v. I n ~ • s)}10vls t lZ 1111G~L~~ ~ . Tccl{ght t .ei~ yUta st11 tec~Ch 01 Eueh yea, 4) Plinlites conflict , ~s~n is i~,e~•sity, e~, ns, each 'l~l D , ,~s.5t~~'e, Ang g 1essOle lr~~es, ~ ee pj~'e I I i~y, Di'i{gs' rimes Mec~sz-~ n j\/jakinv, ,c)ctls C Dec,l, c111c, U Re Sol-litiOM col ion (l 0111 M.nCtgerlent, C,OURT XRID' iPM run bj . coutt1 ~12.19 teenage s b310, thel act ~ou~ clerk, POTS attorn~'nd d Chance for • A SecO St time offenders 1 me misde Types 01 grimes " . e~ MIP ina~ M~w, Trai~ic u~t Grim Theft, ASSa marijuana, Curfe and tobacco' ~rim~na\ Trespass a\c0ho\' -T rUan~y' Violations, Na~assment .niV.Y.M.. . V ...r Does Peer Court Work? y.. '`cwt=" L t.! o- Teaches them valuable life skills. Educational for our youth and beneficial to our community. ! ! We have a 1% re-offend rate. It's been very Yes successful in getting youth back on the right track. LGy101L1 I T a ~ R~r r%REAT DARE to be G SUilfiMER CAMP ~S t 1 A ~ A+ f; i r t f: L. d~ cam? IL ,0 t y One wee ~r t t' 1• we ~ _13, Every yea a, Qnth at end ageSS wanting to atten over Z5~ y list of i4d Wa~t~ng 'have 'a ~ er ~~~hion Sly°~'• <Ne`vsp fun without drugs having s or gng5. { iolcnec J' w •t fa, s c rr r w. .ia+. i t J Crafts a #inle to bond and gnat. llositiN,e ne`v Arts & f riends> LE'ISILITY g'TRIP y u a`~= r camp provides the ent d ring r SUmmex viron~',° ucational en and ed nths• t,.= surer mo - lode classy°°rn activities lnc game", lire.skills Can'p onCept gam vice projects' c commun~~ ser it1eS~ positiveuest speds and arts and reads g , with adult loll crafts t j,. ~ „ ~.,;~r '4 l i ~L~ N~` ~ ~ Sri e+1 fI _ 1 1 r ~ e++°\ ~ ~~r+~ e s p f ~ i ~ ~'t } vF('.. K ~ iM 4 d 1 ' ~~~P sm hk -J ~ ~ t ~y1~ ~a ♦f 2~~ P 3~ 'F, ~ J.' t C S?~~ ' ~Y i t t ~~i? . High school students act as camp counselors, mentor and friend l^ w 1I Mo Camp Counselors volunteer their time to help our youth and our community. N ~ •z x ?yy'..nwl, a CL a tom!) ~ ~ a"•f~"~~~ s akTK4~ • Self-defense class ages 12 on up. • 6 hour class Decrease vulnerability and increase their sense of confidence and personal power • Target areas - eyes -throat -groin -knees -feet • Trust your instincts • Increase your awareness Safety Tips o Safety tips -while walking - driving .in your home . Personal protection _ mace _ alarms -Whistles - dogs _ guns Agenda Item No.: 9 Meeting of: March 23, 2004 REVIEW FINAL DRAFT OF METRO SURVEY: PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES OF A COMMUNITY'S SENSE OF PLACE Council will discuss the survey at its March 16, 2004 meeting. The final draft will be prepared for Council review on March 23 by community development staff. For more information, contact the City Recorder's Office at 503-639-4171 r i i March 17, 2004 (C(OFED)y Gerry Uba CITY OF TIGARD Metro OREGON 600 NE Grand Ave. Portland, OR 97232 Entered into the Record o 3 -Q3 -oL( RE: Performance Measures Survey By Cnm m,ui V) e (IQ Llai_~4AIC~ Agenda Item No. Ot Exhibit No. Dear Gerry: The City of Tigard received Metro's Performance Measures survey and request to comment upon our community's physical sense of place. In response, Tigard considered the survey questions at the Planning Commission meeting on January 26, 2004 and March 14, 2004. The Planning Commission's observations follow: The City of Tigard occupies a unique location in the Portland area, defined by both natural features and major transportation thoroughfares. It was built upon a traditional zoning approach with separation of uses, but also a diversity of uses (commercial, industrial, residential). Tigard also possesses a number of physical features that help define its sense of place, based on the survey's attribute list: ■ The City has a distinct Downtown area (without common areas) with small businesses, however the future commuter rail transit station may become a "common area." ■ The Fanno Creek Greenway Trail winds through Tigard, connecting neighborhoods to one another and to the Civic Center. Cook Park is the City's communal backyard, sited on the Tualatin River. ■ Both the Washington Square Regional Center and the Tigard Triangle are distinct commercial areas with separate development code regulations. ■ Although Tigard does not have Metro-designated Main Streets, state highways OR99W and Hall Blvd. are the primary "streets" in the City. OR99W in particular runs through the middle of Tigard, carrying traffic through the City. Much of this traffic is by non-Tigard residents using the street as a transportation corridor. Highway 217 has a peripheral impact on traffic patterns in the City, since a number of trips are by local residents using the highway, in effect, as a local street. ■ The community's street design follows typical suburban design with residential cul-de-sacs and limited connectivity. 13125 SW H(#. iS>ie~TQary 9 X503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 ■ The City gains its greatest sense of place from its diverse topography and natural features, including trees. From Bull Mountain and little Bull Mountain, to the lowlands along the Tualatin River on the south, and the lower "bowl" elevation in between, Tigard residents identify with the City's strong physical presence. • Washington Square Mall is a regional shopping draw. The above list summarizes Tigard's primary elements that contribute to its sense of place. However, it should be noted that some of these features also present challenges, particularly those that are transportation-related, with respect to funding and local control. These challenges will continue as our community continues to grow and will require innovative approaches involving all of our government partners. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Best regards, Mark Padgett President Tigard Planning Commission t tq H:\PC1Metro Survey Letter 3-17-04.DOC AGENDA ITEM # /O FOR AGENDA OF March 23, 2004 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Update on Mediation Services •2 - PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Ann Newton DEPT HEAD OK _ tJ CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL A report to City Council on the mediation services provided by the city through the Beaverton Dispute Resolution Center STAFF RECOMMENDATION No action is necessary. This is an information item. INFORMATION SUMMARY Since 1996, the city has contracted with the Beaverton Dispute Resolution Center (BDRC) for mediation services. The city chose to contract with Beaverton rather than create its own program based on the Center's excellent reputation, highly trained volunteers, and ability to respond quickly to our referrals. Contracting with Beaverton is also significantly less expensive than an in-house program. The BDRC provides mediation services, offers conflict resolution workshops and has assisted the Tigard Police Department with large group facilitation. The services are offered at no charge to Tigard citizens. The city pays the $250 charge for each case. In FY 02 - 03 20 Tigard cases were handled by the BDRC. The types of disputes mediated include animal control, noise, trees, interpersonal and others. Citizens can contact the BDRC on their own but referrals are also made by police officers, the city's code compliance officer, and other city staff members. Mediation is confidential. The city is only notified of the type of cases resolved. Both parties must agree to participate in mediation. The satisfaction rate for participants is 95 Tigard residents are also eligible to be trained as mediators. The city pays the cost of that training provided the participant agrees to serve as a mediator with the program for at least one year after completing the training. The next training session is scheduled for fall 2004. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A ATTACHMENT LIST Review of Tigard Cases 7/96 - 3/04 City of Tigard Cases 7/96 - 3/04 City of Tigard Case Referrals 7/96 - 3/04 FISCAL NOTES There is $4,000 in the 2003 - 04 budget for mediation services. Review of Tigard Cases 7/96-3/04 Trends • Predominant cases o Animal control o Landlord/tenant o Interpersonal issues o Property maintenance o Consumer issues o Trees/vegetation • Most referrals have historically come from City staff but these have dropped off significantly since 7/02. • The Department of Justice and Attorney General's Office provided some consumer cases from 7/99-6/02 but they no longer refer cases. • More cases are generated from WC Animal Control, self-referral, previous clients, and advertising. We are also seeing a small increase in the number of HOA cases. Planned Outreach • New brochures targeting Neighborhood Mediation, Landlord/Tenant Mediation, and Business/Consumer Mediation. • Direct outreach to the small business community, landlords, and communities with HOAs. City of Tigard Cases 7196-3104 7/98-8/97 7/97-e/98 7/98-e/99 7199.6100 7100.8/01 7/014V02 7/02-6103 7/03-3104 Animal Control 1 2 3 7 1 5 5 5 Consumer/merchant 0 0 0 3 e 5 0 0 Harassment 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 Interpersonal 1 0 4 3 4 3 2 3 Landiorditenant 3 2 2 4 5 5 7 0 Noise 1 2 0 1 2 3 1 1 Property maintenance 3 2 3 1 2 4 0 0 Tree/vegetation 4 0 1 1 2 3 1 1 Workplace 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MDP 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Boundary 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Traffic/parking 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Nuisance 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Other 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 15 8 15 22 27 30 20 11 7/03-3/04 7/02-6/03 7/01-6/02 Ida x 7/00-6/01 ° Q -x 7/99-6/00 °c o~y 7/98-6/99 4~ cyJ 0, 0 4Z ca 0 Q° ~41 7/97-6/98 Q~ V° ~c v Q` ,~`a~ 7/96-6/97 City of Tigard Case Referrals 7/96-3104 Codes Staff Police WC Animal WC Housing Dept of Justice Att. Gen. Self Prev. Client Landlord Man. Dwelling Advert. 7/98-8197 8 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 7197-6/98 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9&6199 3 4 1 1 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 7/99.8100 1 9 2 2 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 7100.8101 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 6 0 1 1 1 7/01-6102 3 7 2 4 0 1 1 2 1 3 0 4 7/02-6/03 1 3 1 4 0 0 0 4 2 2 2 0 7/03.3/04 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 7103-3104 7102-6103 7/01.6/02 7/00-6101 - 7199-6/00 m`' e o~~c~ \cj G0~' 7198-6199 GQ$' ,~,o o~~ P,~• 0J • Nee, p 7197-6198 cip ~G N. Q~ fat`' -+-7196-6197 How Services are Provided City/ of Tigard . Contract with Beaverton Dispute Resolution Center since 1996 - Excellent reputation Mediation Program - Highly trained volunteers Program 1 -Quick response - More cost effective Beaverton Dispute Resolution Types of Cases Center Services • Animal control • Mediation • Noise • Conflict Resolution Workshops • Trees • Large group facilitations • Landlord / Tenant • City of Tigard pays $250 per case • Consumer / Merchant • Services free to Tigard residents • Harassment • Interpersonal Number of Cases How Cases Are Referred • City Staff -Code Compliance Officer • Range from 8 in 1997-1998 - Police to 30 in 2001-2002 • Average just under 20 per year • Washington County -Animal Control • Highest number are animal control - Housing • Self-referral • Majority referred by City staff 1 7i The Process • Mediation is confidential - City Is notified of type of case • All parties must agree to participate - satisfaction rate is 98% • Tigard residents can be trained as Mediators - Qty pays fee with commitment to serve for one year - Next training scheduled for Fall 2004 2 0~4 OF Tro Council Meeting Recap & A Staff Assignments Meeting of 3123/04 gum Number 0052 Barg (Note: The following recap was prepared to record, In an abbreviated outline, the final decisions by the Council or Council's direction to staff. Formal, more-detailed minutes will be prepared for Council consideration at a later date. For more Information, contact City Recorder Cathy Wheatley at 503-639-4171, Ext 2410 or cathy@ci.tigard.or.us) • STUDY SESSION > ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS a. Councilor Nick Wilson has been selected as the MPAC Alternate to Mayor Richard Kidd, representing the smaller cities In Washington County. b. Council discussed the process for Agenda Item No. 7: Presentation of Preliminary Engineer's Report for the Proposed Wall Street Local Improvement District. City Engineer Duenas will present the Preliminary Engineer's Report, however, his recommendation will be to postpone asking the Council to make a decision on whether to consider a resolution of intent to form the district and then hold a public hearing until some time after April 7. On April 7, City staff will meet with the Oregon Department of Transportation for a pre-hearing session on the request for a permit to cross over the railroad tracks. No public testimony will be received tonight. City Attorney Ramis confirmed that he could update Council and the staff on the terms of the library property sale agreement with Fred Fields. The first 425-feet of Wall Street, which Intersects at Hall Boulevard, will be constructed for the Library access and is separate from the LID process. • Distribute recent e-mail communications received regarding the proposed Wall Street LID c. Calendar Review i • March 31 - Retirement Dinner for Joe Grisham - 5 p.m. - Tigard Senior Center • April 5 - joint Meeting with TTSD and City of Tualatin City Council - 6:30 p.m. • April 7 - Employee Recognition Event - 3-4 p.m. Town Ha!I - Councilors Moore and Sherwood indicated they planned to attend; Mayor Dirksen and Councilors Woodruff and Wilson will check their schedules. • April 13 - Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. • April 20 - Council Workshop Meeting - 6:30 p.m. • April 27 - Council Business Meeting - 6:30 p.m. Council Meeting Follow-Up Meeting of March 16, 2004 - Page 1 d. Tualatin Television program: "Talk of the Town." In response to a question from Assistant to the City Manager Newton regarding possible Tigard features, the "Downtown" and "Water" were suggested. e. Agenda Item No. 9 references the draft Metro Survey regarding a "Community's Sense of Place." This survey was discussed by Council on March 16. Staff prepared a letter that was signed by Planning Commission President Padgett. This letter was distributed to the Council and Is on file with the City Recorder. f. Mayor Dirksen advised that he had been asked to welcome the Hindu Spiritual Leader who is arriving soon in Los Angeles from India. A Hindu ashram was recently built in Tigard. After talking to the Oregon Government Standards and Practices Commission, Mayor Dirksen decided he should not go to Los Angeles. > EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 6:45 p.m. under ORS 192.660 (1) (f) to consider records that are "exempt by law from public Inspection." Executive Session concluded at 6:56 p.m. > Goal 5 Update Associate Planner Roberts presented Information on this item. Tigard and nine other Washington County cities (Basin Partners) have joined with the County, Clean Water Services and the Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District to develop a fish and wildlife protection plan for the Tualatin River Basin. This collaborative effort Is being undertaken in cooperation with Metro. Two open houses have been scheduled to present information about the draft analyses of watershed health and the partners' site- specific recommendations on fish and wildlife habitat protection. A public hearing where citizens can direct input on the recommendations is scheduled for March 29, 2004. Associate Planner Roberts reviewed Information on riparian areas (adjacent to streams) and wildlife resources, which included Tigard's existing map of sensitive areas. The Basin Partners has accepted the sensitive lands inventory. Mr. Roberts spoke about the Environmental Social Economic Energy analysis review of impact areas (inner and outer impact areas adjacent to streams). Conceptual decisions are being finalized by the Basin Partners. He also reviewed conflicting use categories for high-intensity urban, other urban, future urban and non urban areas. A chart has been developed for areas that will "Allow Conflicting Uses," "Limit Conflicting Uses," and "Prohibiting Conflicting Uses" (ALP). The definitions for the uses and classifications for the ALP chart are conceptual at this time. Associate Planner Roberts referred to the March 29 hearing (see first paragraph above). Council discussion followed. Councilor Wilson is Tigard's representative to the Basin Partners and he said other cities appear to have already formulated opinions on the Basin Partner's recommendation more than what Tigard has done. He referred to the "fair amount" of protection Tigard already has in place for sensitive lands. Councilor Wilson was concerned that he was not prepared to cast a vote on this matter after the public hearing on March 29. A citizen from the audience, Brian Wegener, indicated that he thought the hearing was to be on the 29'h of March; however, the Basin Partners were not scheduled to take a final vote on its recommendations for fish and wildlife habitat protection until April 12. The Planning Commission's recommendation to Council was to support the adoption of the Goal 5 ALP general recommendation, conditional upon Metro making changes to its sensitive lands inventory Council Meeting Follow-Up Meeting of March 16, 2004 - Page 2 map and to explicitly recognize the preliminary designations and definitions of the ALP chart are not yet developed. Council discussion followed on what its position might be. Mr. Wegener questioned why the Council would take a position before the March 29 public hearing. Councilor Wilson plans to attend the hearing. Study Session concluded at 7:33 p.m. 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Mayor Dirksen called the City Council at Local Contract Review Board to order at 7:40 p.m. 1.2 Mayor Dirksen and Council Members Moore, Sherwood, Wilson, and Woodruff were present. Also present: Tigard Youth Advisory Council President Boyce. 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications 8t Liaison Reports: None 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items: None 2. PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Dirksen read the two proclamations listed below: 2.1 Proclaiming April 15, 2004 as Arbor Day 2.2 Proclaiming April 12-18, 2004 as National Community Development Week 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA Mr. David Crosswhite testified noting his appreciation for the Council's efforts to make Tigard a livable City. He especially thanked the City for the sewer reimbursement district program, which Is an affordable way for homeowners to eliminate septic systems. Mr. Crosswhite suggested that the City look at addressing storm drainage Issues at the same time the reimbursement district Is formed for the Edgewood area. He recited some of the past problems with storm drainage. A copy of a letter outlining Mr. Crosswhite's comments to Council Is on file with the City Recorder. Mr. Crosswhite's concerns/suggestions will be reviewed by City Engineer Duenas who will then report his recommendations to Council. (Note: Susan Murray signed in to speak to Council on the Wall Street Extension. Staff had advised Ms. Murray that no public testimony would be entertained by Council on this matter at this meeting. A public hearing will be scheduled if the Council decides to pursue formation of the Local Improvement District for the Wall Street Extension.) • Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce President Dan Murphy was present and announced upcoming Chamber of Commerce events. In response to an inquiry from Councilor Sherwood, Chamber President Murphy was going to follow up with regard to Chamber members' participation in talks with the Oregon Department of Transportation about traffic issues and the need for traffic improvements in Tigard. 4. PRESENTATION OF CRYSTAL AWARD FOR THE KOREAN WAR VIDEO Tualatin Valley Television (TVTV) Executive Director Marci Nosier presented the Crystal Award, which City of Tigard and TVTV received for Its production of a Korean War 501 Anniversary documentary on video. Carol McAndrew, a former volunteer for the City of Tigard was Council Meeting Follow-Up Meeting of March 16, 2004 - Page 3 7~ Instrumental in producing the video. Ms. McAndrew said a few words, praising the City's volunteer program and the opportunity to work on the video with TVTV staff member josh Anderson. The Council and audience viewed a few minutes of the documentary. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: Council approved the Consent Agenda as follows: 5.1 Approve Council Minutes for February 24, 2004 5.2 Approve Budget Amendment No. 18 to the FY 2003-04 Budget to Increase Appropriations for Funding of the Implementation of the Billing for the Street Maintenance Fee - Resolution No. 04 -17 5.3 Appoint Initial Members to the Planned Development Review Committee - Resolution No. 04 -18 5.4 Approve Right-of-Way Dedication for SW 68d' Parkway Right of Way - Resolution No. 04 - 19 5.5 Local contract Review Board: a. Award Contract for an Automated Inspection Request System to Selection Technologies, Inc. b. Award Contract for the Construction of FY 2003-04 Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation Program to Planned and Engineered Construction, Inc. 6. ACKNOWLEDGE THE LEADERSHIP AND DEDICATED COMMUNITY SERVICE RENDERED BY JOSEPH GRISHAM, POLICE LIEUTENANT FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD FROM MARCH 16, 1997, TO MARCH 31, 2004 Assistant Chief Al Orr presented the staff report on this item and noted the distinguished career of retiring Lt. Joseph Grisham. Council adopted Resolution No. 04-20 (which was read by Mayor Dirksen), recognizing the dedicated services rendered by Lt. Joseph Grisham to the City of Tigard from March 16, 1977 to March 31, 2004. 7. PRESENTATION OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED WALL STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT City Engineer Duenas presented the staff report on this item and the PowerPoint slide presentation noting the highlights of his report Is on file with the City Recorder. After discussion, consensus of Council was to agree with the staff recommendation to delay a decision until the hearing on the crossing is completed. (This Item was also discussed during the Study Session portion of this meeting, see Page 1.) City Attorney Ramis, in response to an inquiry from Councilor Woodruff, advised that the agreement between the City of Tigard and Mr. Fred Fields (for purchase of the new library site) specifies that the City is to pursue (in good faith) the possibility of formation of an LID for the Wall Street extension. Once ODOT renders a decision on whether or not to allow a railroad crossing, staff will report the results to Council and the Council may consider other options or decide at that time to terminate the LID proceedings. If the Council moves forward towards formation of an LID, a public hearing will be conducted. 8. REVIEW POLICE YOUTH PROGRAMS Council Meeting Follow-Up Meeting of March 16, 2004 - Page 4 Assistant Chief Al Orr, Lt. Rick Rhodes, Officer Mike Eskew, and Officer Sheryl Huiras presented Information on police youth programs. The School Resource Officer Program (SRO) provides many valuable resources for Tigard's youth, the schools, and the community. The SRO provides the response for emergency and criminal incidents that occur within the schools for 7,366 students. Programs highlighted in the presentation to Council Included Drug Abuse Resistance Education Classes (DARE), Gang Resistance Education 8L Training (GREAT), DARE to be GREAT Summer Camp, and Women's Self-Defense Classes. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation viewed by the Council Is on file with the City Recorder. 9. REVIEW FINAL DRAFT OF METRO SURVEY: PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES OF A COMMUNITY'S SENSE OF PLACE Council received a copy of the letter (signed by Planning Commission President Padgett) sent to Metro as was discussed by Council at Its March 16, 2004, workshop meeting. 10. UPDATE ON MEDIATION SERVICES Assistant to the City Manager Newton presented a report to the City Council on the mediation services provided by the City through the Beaverton Dispute Resolution Center. This service is offered at no charge to Tigard residents and has a satisfaction rate of 95%. A copy of the highlights of Ms. Newton's presentation Is on fife with the City Recorder. 11. REVIEW METRO'S HIGHWAY 217 NEEDS AND VALUES SURVEY City Engineer Duenas presented Council with a compilation of their individual responses to tiie Metro Highway 217 Needs and Values Survey. Consensus of Council was for the City Engineer to combine the Council's response and forward to Metro under cover of a letter from Mayor Dirksen. 12. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS Councilor Moore asked to be placed on the next City Council agenda to update Council on the Highway 217 Advisory Committee and the Policy Committee for the Tualatin River Basin (Hagg Lake dam raise). 13. NON AGENDA ITEMS: None 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Not held. 15. ADJOURNMENT: 9:16 p.m. 1Aadmncetl~=NW4()= swan fetter ace Council Meeting Follow-Up Meeting of March 16, 2004 - Page 5 Highway 217 Needs Values Winter 2004 Question Summary 6. How well do you think Highway 217 works? Choose one Ve well OK 2 vote that it works OK. 3 vote 'not very well' Not very well Ve oori 7. Where do you encounter problems on Highway 217? (Choose all that apply) Gettin on the highway Getting off the highway Problems are encountered getting on & off the Hwy and two say on the On the highway hwy itself. Other 8. What problems do you experience on Highway 217? Choose all that apply) Congestion 4 votes Bottlenecks at exits and entrances 2 votes Unreliable Difficult to mere 2 vote Lack of transit service 1 vote Other 9. Where should Improvements be focused? Choose all that apply) On Highway 217 3 votes On major streets Hall, Scholls Ferry, etc.. 2 votes On the rams 2 votes On bike and pedestrian routes On transit routes On routes that cross Highway 217 1 vote Other 10. Where is it most important to make Improvements? (Choose one) On Hi hwa 217 2 votes On major streets Hall, Scholls Ferry, etc.. 3 votes On the ramps On bike and pedestrian routes On transit routes On routes that cross Highway 217 Other 11. In other cities, a concept called rush hour tolling, or value pricing, has been used to give drivers another option to sitting in traffic and help fund construction of new lanes. In this case, rush hour tolling would Include building a new lane on Highway 217 that drivers would pay a fee to use. The Majority are against this Idea. toll would only be applied to the new lane and would be assessed electronically without requiring drivers to stop at a tollbooth. The toll would vary so that It would cost more to use the lane during congested times. What do you think of this Idea? 12. Carpool lanes are a way of getting more use out of a single lane and giving people an incentive to form carpools or take transit. What do you think about restricting a new lane Consensus is against this idea. to only carpools and buses? 13. All improvements to Highway 217 would have impacts. How Important is It that the selected option: 4of6 LEGIEILITY STRIP Highway 217 Needs Values Winter 2004 Summary clot Ve Question Neutral Avoid im to natural resources to 217 Somewhat acts Ve Avoid acquiring homes or businesses to build mP rovements Ve Avoid worsonln air uali void addin traffic to ma or streets nt are the follow infl' A in the corridor uses. How Important Very fflc flow Im rove tra for a variety of Purp Very % Flighway 217 Is used destinations along 217 Some,Nhat 5 and 26) Serving local residents In reaching and 217 Very Connecting 1 mut residents to areas h the corridor veling throu9 Very Serving commuters Ua ton Square and Beaverton areas Providing access for freight as the Washing ss to regional destinations such Choose providing a is most im ortant? 15. W hich of the followin one 3 votes destinations along the l tighway 2 votes Serving local residents in reaching hway 217 (Le. 1-5 and US 26) and Hig Connecting local residents to are- corridor s h the throu h Servin commuters travelin downtown Beaverton) °od access for fret ht ton Square providin regional destinations (washing you to Providing access to reg hway 217 corrldoua ea?at~h~ose tall that apply) 1 vote rovements in the llig ton Square 3 motes 16. What imp Beaverton or the washing access downtown Im roved interchan es on Hi hwa 2i7 b ke or edestrian access 3 votes lm roved surface streets Im roved m roved ti e or edestrian access across Hi hwa 217 More transit service iti on al lanes on Hl hwa 217 should Consensus = no study Add other on Highway 217, do You think the Asa way to improve trafficflow and suggest that this idea 17. As interchanges? to reduce on 8, off access consider eliminating Comments say onilyye 9oet of providing mobility. does not support 17a. If you answered Y85i Which interchanges? 5of6 `F~,v,Mr t r ~ ~ ~.r NeadsVslues H1,3103 ~n et 2004 sum so the a Question but connect it to at the 3 no 1 Yes, A m e. e 01 ' ategy is used at th interchan9 o close on Should considef dlgeavIi►04111 wou{d be t h1obvisy, Shl stustrdy pal. Canyon R Combine tnterchana that Parapets the u think the menu: com 18. One way a to roe hwaY exit, Do 10 TWO previous exit with Hillsdale 1119 dl 80 Canyon Ro j a cha e 0ses? combining es4 (Choose all that aPP{'~ 2 dies which interchang study? Bred YB5' ie to gather input about the 3 votes tf you anew can e best reach peoP 2 votes survey w 18• How 1 vote for scientific phone twa% Web site t AeV hborho~ meettn 5 votes E.mall nt web site Choose all that a 1 Lodi ovemrne read re ularl Other Brs do ou vote 20, W s 1 and limes 5 vote es i vote e geavert on Review im Lake Oswe es Tualatin Ti ► of Commerce 1 YOB td G,tyscaPe i► Jouma vote:TV oa OnAlatl jt,e ore The Portland Tribune Willamette week) Hillsboro pr us al Business 3oum Other • gof6 i Highway 217 Needs Values Winter 2004 Question Craig Dirksen Brian Moore Tom Woodruff Nick Wilson Sydney Sherwood 6. How well do you think Highway 217 works? Very well OK X X Not very well x X X Very Poorly 7. Where do you encounter problems on Highway 217? Getting on the highway x X 'Getting off the highway x On the highway x X X Other 8. What problems do you experience on Hi hwa 217? Congestion x X X X Bottlenecks at exits and entrances x X Unreliable Difficult to mere x X Lack of transit service x Other 7 Where should Improvements be focused? no answer On Highway 217 X X X On major streets Hall, Scholls Ferry, etc.. X X On the rams x X On bike and Pedestrian routes On transit routes On routes that cross Highway 217 X Other 10. Where is it most Important to make Improvements? On Highway 217 X X On major streets Hall, Scholls Ferry, etc.. X X X On the ramps On bike and pedestrian routes On transit routes On routes that cross Highway 217 Other 11. In other cities, a concept called rush hour tolling, or value pricing, has been used to give drivers another option to sitting In traffic and help fund construction of new lanes. In this case, rush hour toiling would include building a new lane on Highway 217 Best use of lanes 24/7'7 interesting- I would like Not appropriate for this that drivers would pay a fee to use. The toll would only be applied looks like a no. 217 is used mostly for local Good Idea to the new lane and would be assessed electronically without use/ wasted lane to know more facility requiring drivers to stop at a tollbooth. The toll would vary so that it would cost more to use the lane during congested times. What do you think of this Idea? 12. Carpool lanes are a way of getting more use out of a single 1 do not believe that Best use of lanes 24(17 lane and giving people an Incentive to form carpools or take they would incen4 transit. What do you think about restricting a new lane to only Looks like a no. 217 is used mostly for local Not too practical people to leave cars at Not effective carpools an buses? use/ wasted lane home 13. All improvements to Highway 217 would have impacts. How Important is it that the selected option: 1 of 6 n So ood LE~~61L[fY gTFtIP OOOOW e0She G 21Z Needsvalues NickWUso sydr► mawh H14twayjVintet2004 SomWpOdru" Notve Noiveri re Somewhat tot very somewhat Brian Moo $Ome,Nhat Craig 0irksa Ve Sommeat No ve Ve at Nje Not ve Neutral SorVe~ Ve Question Neutral $0 eat Ve Ve Very S1e 1 resources roVenents to 217 some at Ve at very 1 to naturo build imp gomev't'at Somewhat Neutra 01 IM acts businesses to Ve Very homes or somewhat Very c4 Very Very p,vold a ng "all gets oHant Somewhat nla Some,Nhat 5ome,'at v su How Imp enln 0 to Aoidvyors dor urposes. 0"'.0hat sie,Nhat Very Somewhat Av ddtn corn varietyofp oid a {ft°217 is Usedior a Very lm rove tra along 217 at VeN X 14. Highway deettnal~0ns Very Som are the EotiowIn and 217 (1-5 and 261 X 1 residents in reaching Very Very SeNing iota sidents to areas bey ma comdor through very Connectin9mmI 1e rere{mvalin9 Washin9tp° X $erving c° such as the X JOT fcelght bons access lonal desilna pt0vidin9 acre ortant? Choose one ss to re9 Providing act verton areas is mast lm along the Hlgn,01 S ua ht h of the iollowln destinations 1s. in reaching and Highway 217 Cti•e• 15 and X Song local residents areas bey local residents to h the comdor ~pnnecting throw S ware, X us 2 commuters travelin ton q tit setd ac l a Providin cess far tr` dasunaUons Washing p0 ss to re9iona the Highway 217 corridor would mak X X X B vent°n or the downtownat irnPrOVements Indowntown Beaverton X 16. Wh to access X No it easier for IOU uare area? 217 X No Washington es on k4 hwa IM roved interchce sUeets an access wa 217 No Im roved surfa bike or edestri s south cress across Ni rovethi Im roved north- edesbjan a Yes can imp by bike or You of any hwy eats IM roved Hi hwa 217 Maybe {unction ss but that no comet Umiung a ai hera- More transit service on Highway 217 do you think pddrgonal lanes or' o Is not th 19 or should The g°a . S ether rc flow & Ott no comments IMP rove traif ling interchange s? Only to r edu on be provid+ng 17. AS a waY to o consider elimina access to 217 the study should comments no answered Yes' which interchanges? 11a. it you 2ot6 Highway 217 Needs Values Winter 2004 Question Craig Dirksen Brian Moore Tom Woodruff Nick Wilson Sydney Sherwood 18. One way to combine Interchanges would be to close one exit, but connect It to the previous exit with a connector road that parallels the highway. This strategy is used at the Canyon Road/ No Yes No No Maybe Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway exit. Do you think the study should consider combining in erchan ? The above mentioned if you answered yes, which interchanges? no comment All no comment exit is the most no comments conaested 19. How can we best reach people to gather Input about the stud Mailings X X Metro web site Neighborhood meeting X X X E-mail Local ovemment web site X X Other Scientific Phone I 20. What newspapers do you read regularly? The Tigard Times X X X X X The Beaverton Valle Times Lake Oswego Review Tualatin Times Dail Journal of Commerce X The Oregonian X X X X X The Portland Tribune X Willamette Weekly Hillsboro Ar us Business Journal X Other Tigard Cityscape 3of6