City Council Packet - 01/20/2004
'x e f t.t -t^4 a i. r tt 'a= , Ir r 1 f. i.'~
Wi Ni.s• ivy . ~ } r4 f'r tikl.~•Y 7r r~. tYrr "~J h f r i ':7 ~ ' F~' ta.;~ ) ei..t- r'' 3~ik t.. ~ r ~ ' 4yx ~ r r, t i ~ l:
s K F ~~rt r Gl. r'. ~ r ~3 , ri t r-t t ~a. x f, /r - 4
1 ✓~,'llTrvl! 'tY ~ Y i~,J• SYt h! V ~ ~ ~ J e l t ~ 1~ J ? , 4 r
Y ^'"ti ^N,vt~ r 1~n I ry'it. ' At1 c• i x { r
rv sty t s 1 ~:1 Tr✓ : 71tiE a ; ~ 1 x F y s ! e f r I t r, t,:
0A. r ry l t 4,
rq r F ii r Y1_~YxL r~ _y y {.k I y i. fi F t 7",;
14
nl c f r
t P r ~"6 k'a,~rtl r,ls k a ' a t. -
f3w l I yr 4 f ,r r s
r f r, i i. f, t J, :r. t t r ,7r 7
~ r
I. ~
tti~sTC 1
r; , s
~f TIGAR® CITY COUNCIL
WORKSHOP MEETING
January 20, 2004
f _
COUNCIL MEETING WILL NOT BE
TELEVISED
=~I airy '
r 4r _
s° sz M1'" ~ l.~OfslDonnas~ccpkl.~r
~ y ~~t r.Ef7dr a?sri a ~ E ~ ( t I l` ~ L' ~ .
Wp. ~ t;t J~';A r „ x"ao'e~Yulb. ,,.,~L`E, 9f~ ~I± e I.{ ~T•
Agenda Item No. 3, 1
Council Meeting of Q. i
COUNCIL MINUTES
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING
January 20, 2004
1. WORKSHOP MEETING
i.1 Call to Order - Mayor Dirksen called the meeting to order at 5 p.m.
1.2 Roll Call: Council Present: Mayor Dirksen, Councilors Moore, Sherwood
and Wilson.
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications U Liaison Reports: None
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non Agenda Items: Administrative Items were
discussed at the end of the meeting, those items are listed below.
2. COUNCIL DISCUSSION - TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC PLANNING
Community Development Director gave an overview of the resources available with
regard to current transportation plans and priority lists. These resources included the
Transportation System Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, Regional Transportation Plan,
Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Plan, the Local Service Transit
Action Plant (TriMet)and Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program.
Listed below is a summary of the items discussed by Council members and staff:
• The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) proposed project list will be presented to the
Planning Commission on February 7 and to the Council on February 17. The
Plan will show a five-year plan; however, the Council only approves the project list
for the upcoming fiscal year. It is not too late to revise the CIP.
• The MSTIP-4 funding list has not yet been developed.
• The Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force (TSTF) will be reconstituted;
additional members will be sought. Councilor Sherwood advised she would like to
see a business representative on this Task Force.
• Discussion returned several times to a potential Walnut Street extension (from
Walnut at 99W to Ash Street to Hunziker Street to 72,d Avenue) to provide an
additional east/west connection through the community, which could provide
some relief to the heavy traffic on 99W.
• 99W is the "worst problem" because of its congestion and it is not pedestrian
friendly or nice looking.
• An alarming number (one-half) of Tigard intersections are projected to fail by
2015.
• There Is a need to prioritize how the City would like to proceed on transportation
Issues with dollars spent on those areas that will provide the most benefit.
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - January 20, 2004 Page 1
• Funding was discussed several times noting that there are limited funds available at
all levels - local, Metro, state, and federal.
• An observation was made that bicycle lanes on busy roads (i.e., Scholls Ferry
Road) are not used extensively and it was expensive to set aside these lanes for
bicycle traffic. Would it be better to use those lanes devoted to bicycles for
vehicle traffic and provide for bicycle travel elsewhere - reroute away from
streets? Ask the state to reconsider this rule.
• Consider prioritizing those areas that will ease the congestion in the worst areas
first.
• As the TSP notes, many things must be done to help Pacific Highway. Look at
Scholls Ferry which works much better than Pacific Highway with about as much
traffic.
• Review the findings made by the 99W Task Force.
• Are there alternate routes that could serve as a bypass to 99W? It was noted that
the Wilsonville 99W bypass route had no positive effect for that portion of 99W
in Tigard.
• There is a need to convince other agencies that 99W conveys regional traffic.
• TriMet has begun talks about a light rail connection along Barbur Boulevard.
• Consider using Capital Improvement Plan funds to alleviate problems on 99W.
The Walnut Street extension (also referred to during the meeting as the Ash Street
connection) might be a good starting point.
• Issues on 99W seem to include access control and improving connections at cross
streets (traffic signals).
• Consider reconfiguring how businesses develop and it was suggested that parking
areas be built centrally behind businesses. This could be considered during a
Comprehensive Plan review.
• The Highway 217 study plans show funding is needed for major arterial
improvements.
• Tigard's transportation problem solving efforts are impeded because of obstacles
such as railroad tracks, natural streams, and 99W.
• Strategies need to be identified for problem areas. City should work with those
agencies responsible; i.e., the Oregon Department of Transportation. The City
might be able to offer to fund part of the needed improvements to help move
some of these projects higher on the state's priority list.
• It is crucial that Tigard has a role in regional discussions with both the staff and
City Council. participating in those discussions.
City needs to determine what will benefit the most for the dollars expended before
discussing needs with other agencies.
• Burnham Street is being considered for an overlay project. Major work will not go
forward until it is known what will be proposed for the central business district.
• Council reviewed the draft Council goal for 2004 for transportation and made
some changes. The goal now reads:
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - January 20, 2004 Page 2
A. Aggressively pursue solutions to congestion of state, county and city
facilities that cross through Tigard.
1. Reforming the Transportation Financing Task Force.
a. Explore outside funding sources
b. To recommend to the City Council expansion of the task force
functions
2. Identify project priorities and funding needs for state and city
facilities.
a. Prioritize all project needs - city, county and state facilities in
Tigard
b. For priority facilities which are controlled by another entity,
1. Discuss the project with the entity which has jurisdiction
over the facility; and
2. Negotiate a funding solution which could include partial
city funding; and
3. Offer to improve a related city transportation problem in
exchange for the other entity completing a needed
transportation facility; and
4. Offer to accept jurisdiction for the improved facility
upon project completion.
• Consider utilizing the TFSTF to review and make recommendations on some of
the items discussed at this meeting.
• Adding a dedicated right-hand turn lane on both Hall and Greenburg would be
beneficial. This might be eligible as an MSTIP project.
• City Engineer will look at developing a proposed priority list of transportation
projects based on the discussion at this meeting to prioritize projects that provide
the most benefit to alleviate congestion. Estimated costs will be shown on this list.
• City Engineer will review a Metro grant program, Creating Livable Streets.
3. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS: None
4. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: None
5. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Not held.
a Administrative Items
• Discuss Bull Mountain Annexation Plan Subcommittees. Council decided that, as
a starting point, the following subcommittees would be formed: Parks,
Police/Sheriff, Streets (Maintenance and Capital Improvements) and Planning.
Tasks are to be Identified that can be completed within the established time frame.
• Council reviewed the draft Council goals, which will be considered for adoption at
the January 27, 2004, Council meeting.
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - January 20, 2004 Page 3
6. ADJOURNMENT: 8:06 p.m.
W
Catherine Wheatley, City a ! r
Attest:
/,,Z-; ,
or ity of Tigard
Date: 2 -/a
iAadm\cathy\ccm\2004\01 01 20.doc
Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes - January 20, 2004 Page 4
City of Tigard, Oregon
Affidavit of Notification
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
In the Matter of the Proposed Notification of Meeting Time
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
City off/ Tigard (A,-:5 I, L'1y Eee A. TUAJ , being first duly sworn (or affirmed), by
oath (or affirmation), depose and say:
That I notified the following people/organizations by fax of the meeting time of
the City Council meeting on \.T,4A 1i AR y_2D~ 2004 with a copy of the
Notice of City Council Meeting Time being hereto attached and by reference
made a part hereof, on the day of l {1NGL 20U-4-
El Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724)
Steve Lindsley, Regal Courier, (Fax No. 503-968-7397)
P /Paige Parker, The Oregonian, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-968-6061)
C iS,Q C 1
Signature of Person who Performed Notification
S bscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me this Z day of
~1 , 20-"-.
OFFICIAL SEAL
;b J BENGTSON -
NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON Sig ature of Lary Pu lic for Oregon
COMMISSION NO. 368086
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR. 27, 2007
I:WDM\GREER\FORMS\AFFIDAVrrSV\FFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION - MTG TIME.DOC
01/12/2004 16:34 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard Ca 001
7
MULTI TX/RX REPORT
TX/RX NO 2495
PGS. 1
TX/RX INCOMPLETE
TRANSACTION OK [ 0615035460724 TT Newsroom
[ 0915039686061 Oregonian
[ 1115039687397 Regal Courier
ERROR INFORMATION
CITY OF TIGARD
NOTICE OF
CITY COUNCIL 14EETING TIME
Please forward to:
D"Barbara Sherman, News om, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724)
'Steve Lindsley, Regal Co trier, (Fax No. 503-966-7397)
["Paige Parker, The Orego flan, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-966-6061)
ANUARY 20, 2004 - 5 p.m.
Notice Is hereby given that a Tigard City Council is meeting at 5 p.m. on Tuesday,
January 20, 2004. (The Council's customary meeting time is 6:30 p.m.) The meeting will
be held In Town Hall and R d Rock Creek Conference Room, City Hall, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon.
The meeting topic will be "Strategic Planning for Transportation."
i
• For further information, please contact City Recorder Cathy Wheatley by calling
503-639-4171 or at 1312 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, 97223.
i
i
City Recorder
Post: City Hall Lobby
Date of Notice: January 12, 2004
P.%[3KCATHYICCA%C0 MTO NOTICESW ME MTG TIME 1-20.04.DOC
M01
CITY OF TIGARD
NOTICE OF
CITY COUNCIL MEETING TIME
Please forward to:
L"1 Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724)
WSteve Lindsley, Regal Courier, (Fax No. 503-968-7397)
5''Palge Parker, The Oregonian, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-968-6061)
JANUARY 20, 2004 - 5 p.m.
Notice is hereby given that the Tigard City Council is meeting at 5 p.m. on Tuesday,
January 20, 2004. (The Council's customary meeting time is 6:30 p.m.) The meeting will
be held in Town Hall and Red Rock Creek Conference Room, City Hall, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon.
The meeting topic will be "Strategic Planning for Transportation."
For further information, please contact City Recorder Cathy Wheatley by calling
503-639-4171 or at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, 97223.
kD-
City Recorder
Post: City Hall Lobby
L Date of Notice: January 12, 2004
c
IAADM\CATHY\CCA\CC MTG NOTICESWOTICE MTG TIME 1-20-04.130C
J
J
City of Tigard, Oregon
Affidavit of Posting
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
In the Matter of the Proposed Notice of Meeting Time
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
City ofd Tigard )
I, [ WEee Q--_665TV A being first duly sworn (or affirmed), by
oath (or affirmation), depose and say:
That I posted in Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, a
copy of Notice of Meeting Time for the City Council meeting of
J'-4NU f-le 2G~-2'o)6 4 with a copy of said Notice being hereto
attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the w~ day of
- J'z~'
Signature of Person who Performed Posting
S bscribed and sworn (or aff' ed) before me this day of
20 a 71-
Si ture of No Public for Oregon
-o OFFICIAL SEAL
J BENGTSON
NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON
COMMISSION NO. 368086
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR. 27, 2007
I:VADM\GREER\FORMS\AFFIDAVITS\AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING - MTG TIMEMOC
CITY OF TIGARD
NOTICE OF
CITY COUNCIL MEETING TIME
Please forward to:
Barbara Sherman, Newsroom, Tigard Times (Fax No. 503-546-0724)
02"Steve Lindsley, Regal Courier, (Fax No. 503-968-7397)
52"'Paige Parker, The Oregonian, Metro SW (Fax No. 503-968-6061)
JANUARY 20, 2004 - 5 p.m.
Notice is hereby given that the Tigard City Council is meeting at 5 p.m. on Tuesday,
January 20, 2004. (The Council's customary meeting time is 6:30 p.m.) The meeting will
be held in Town Hall and Red Rock Creek Conference Room, City Hall, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon.
The meeting topic will be "Strategic Planning for Transportation."
For further information, please contact City Recorder Cathy Wheatley by calling
503-639-4171 or at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, 97223.
City Recorder
Post: City Hall Lobby
Date of Notice: January 12, 2004
IAADM\CATHY\CCA\CC MTG NOTICESWOTICE MTG TIME 1-20-04.DOC
Ci 'C'y (Ze Gc>
4`. T~c'~►~tD v;ITY co.Ui~cirr "
MEETING
]ANUAI2Y 20 004 6:0m. CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
TIGARD CITY_ HALL
1312.5 SW. 'HALL Z VD
TI RD, OR "97223
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be
scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please
call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications
Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;
and
• Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow
as much lead-time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the
Thursday preceding the meeting date by calling:
503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices
for the Deaf).
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 20, 2004 page 1
AGENDA
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING
JANUARY 20, 2004
5:00 PM
1. WORKSHOP MEETING
1.1 Call to Order - City Council
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications at Liaison Reports
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non Agenda Items
2. COUNCIL DISCUSSION - TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC PLANNING
3. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
4. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
5. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If
an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be
announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and
those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news
media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3),
but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held
for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive
Sessions are closed to the public.
> ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS -
• Discuss Bull Mountain Annexation Plan Subcommittees
• Discuss Draft Council Goals
• Urban Renewal Meeting - 1 /21 /04, 7-9 p.m., Beaverton Library, 12375
SW 5' Street, Beaverton (Agenda is attached and is titled: Economic
Revitalization in the Highway 217 Corridor)
10:00 PM
6. ADJOURNMENT
I:\AD M\CATHY\CCA\2004\040120. DOC
COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 20, 2004 page 2
CITY OF TIGARD
Community Development
Shaping A Better Community
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD
TO: City Council n
FROM: Jim Hendryx
DATE: January 13, 2004
SUBJECT: Bull Mountain Annexation Subcommittees
On December 16th, Council voted to take no action on the Annexation Plan as proposed, with the
intent to put it on a November, 2004 ballot. Council directed staff to form subcommittees to
provide additional time for public discussion and understanding of key impacts, including costs and
benefits of annexation. The subcommittees shall consider several issues: Parks, Police, Library,
Planning, Capital Improvements, Street Maintenance. The issues and number of committees
could change.
The objectives of the subcommittees are:
➢ develop an approach for transition of key urban services that occurs through annexation
➢ provide additional venue for public involvement and discussion
➢ develop a strategy for implementation of the Annexation Plan, e.g., funding, planning, etc.
The subcommittees will consist of at least one member from the appropriate City of Tigard
department, the appropriate counterpart from Washington County, and an equal number of private
citizens to be chosen from the Bull Mountain area and City of Tigard residents. It has been
suggested that we could draw upon existing Tigard committee members, e.g., Budget Committee,
Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Board, etc., to serve on corresponding Bull Mountain
subcommittees.
Each subcommittee is charged with producing a white paper of recommendation on their assigned
issue, to be completed on or before June 30, 2004. Council will then review, make changes if
necessary, and approve the white paper. The white papers would be adopted by a separate
resolution. This is necessary to separate the land use process associated with the Annexation
Plan from the public outreach process.
Staff is looking for concurrence on the above-stated objectives and the various subcommittee
designations. Staff will return on January 27th to formalize Council's direction. The December 16th
resolution is attached.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 03--J&&_
A RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING IN JULY, 2004 ON THE BULL
MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION PLAN AND PLACE THE BALLOT MEASURE BEFORE THE
.ELECTORATE IN NOVEMBER, 2004.
WHEREAS, for over 20 years, the City of Tigard and Washington County have recognized that Bull
Mountain and its citizens would be best served by the City of Tigard; and
WHEREAS, one of Council's goals is to establish an annexation policy for unincorporated non-island areas;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard, along with Washington County began looking at the benefits and costs of
annexing the Bull Mountain area in March 2001; and
WHEREAS, the Bull Mountain Annexation study was completed in 2002, after input from Bull Mountain
residents, which identifies potential costs and revenues for the area; and
WHEREAS, in order to gage the public support for a potential annexation, a survey was conducted of
registered voters in the unincorporated Bull Mountain area and the City of Tigard; and
WHEREAS, the Draft Facilities and Services Assessment Report for the Bull Mountain Area was presented
to Council in June and July 2003; and
WHEREAS, ORS 195.220 authorizes "annexation plan" type annexations which allows territory to be
annexed if a majority of all of the votes cast in the territory and the city favor the annexation plan; and
WHEREAS, there are several steps leading up to an election on an annexation plan, including preparation of
an annexation plan, public outreach, public hearing, preparation of ballot title, election, etc.; and
' WHEREAS, Council has considered the alternatives and determined that an annexation plan type of
annexation is the most efficient and effective means to provide unincorporated Bull Mountain and Tigard
residents the opportunity to decide on the issue of annexation while also addressing the City of Tigard and
Washington County goals of annexing the unincorporated Bull Mountain area; and
WHEREAS, per the Urban Service Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Tigard and
Washington County, the County shall allow the City to collect a Park System Development Charge
> (SDQ for new development for the period between the approval date of the Annexation-Plan and the
effective date of the annexation;
i
I WHEREAS, Council reviewed and discussed the Bull Mountain Annexation Plan at the Dec. 2 and Dec.
16, 2003 and determined that the Plan meets the approval criteria as identified in ORS 195 and 222,
j Metro Code Chapter 3.09; Tigard Community Code Chapter 18;
RESOLUTION NO. 03 -
Page 1
1:1CDADWERREEVlhf%AnnexationUtFSOLUnON 124"Idoc
WHEREAS, after receiving public testimony and submittals at the December 2, 2003 public hearing,
Council determined that additional time is needed to work with Washington County and the public to
communicate the benefits of the Bull Mountain Annexation Plan recommendations and to place the Plan
before the voters.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
SECTION 1: Council directs staff to form appropriate subcommittees, consisting of Washington
County representatives, Tigard residents, and unincorporated Bull Mountain residents to
provide additional time for public discussion and review of key benefits of the Bull
Mountain Annexation Plan;
SECTION 2: Council will review subcommittee work by July 2004 and consider placing the Bull
Mountain Annexation Plan on the November 2004 ballot with a July 1, 2005 annexation
date;
SECTION 3: Council requests that the Washington County Board of Commissioners accept this
resolution as a commitment from the Tigard City Council and begin collecting parks
System Development Charges in the unincorporated area to set the funds aside until the
effective annexation date;
SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage.
PASSED: This Day of bahn&r- 2003.
"or
Mayor Pro Terri - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recordet City ofTigard
Greer A. Gaston, Deputy City Recorder
RESOLUTION NO. 03 - (p (D
Page 2
L=AD M1r~RRP~;11IIv1~Mnexa6onlRESOLUTION 12-16.03.doc
MEMORANDUM
Administration
CITY OF TIGARD
ShapingA Better Community
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Bill Monahan, City Manager
DATE: December 16, 2003
SUBJECT: Bull Mountain Annexation - White Paper Task Forces
The City Council is considering delaying action on the decision to adopt the annexation
plan for Bull Mountain. Under consideration is the potential to delay a decision until
July, 2004 allowing sufficient time for City, County, CPO, and citizen representatives to
meet and discuss several key issues.
Discussion of the key issues (streets, parks and open space, sheriff services,
comprehensive planning, etc.) would take place from January through June 2004. An
expected outcome of the discussions would be creation of a White Paper addressing
the issues and opportunities related to each topic and the funding availability and
shortfalls which are anticipated.
To assist the City Council in defining the tasks and likely participants in the White Paper
Task Force, I have outlined a few of the tasks. I would appreciate your review and
comment so staff can develop these task forces over the next few weeks. Attached are
brief outlines of the streets, parks and open space, and transition of service from sheriff
to police.
1AadmlbUAmn os120031=rid1 121503 wNfepapertaskWws.doc
Streets Task Force
Tasks to be worked on:
■ Review of the conditions of all streets within the unincorporated area.
■ Determine which streets will be transferred eventually to Tigard and which, if any,
will remain under County jurisdiction.
■ Determine what revenue will be transferred to Tigard from the enhanced road
maintenance district at the time of annexation.
■ Determine what improvements are planned, and will be made, by Washington
County prior to the effective date of annexation.
■ Determine what road improvements the County can and will make to roads after
the effective date of annexation.
■ Assess the pros and cons of the City requesting transfer of jurisdiction of county
roads. Develop a proposal including timing, sequencing, and identification of
conditions which are necessary for transfer to occur.
■ Determine eligibility of any roads in the area for future Washington County
MSTIP funding. Specifically, determine the County commitment to fund
improvements to Bull Mountain Road under MSTIP.
■ Review the process utilized by Washington County since the mid 1980s when
developers routinely were required to provide non-remonstrance agreements for
all new developments. The non-remonstrance agreements either promised
financial participation on future road improvements or maintenance.
■ Assess the extent of the non-remonstrance agreements and determine if
Washington County should form Local Improvement Districts, calling in the non-
remonstrance agreements, to make road improvements.
■ Obtain and review legal analysis from the County Counsel's office regarding
whether after annexation the City or County can enforce the non-remonstrance
agreements for:
1, a County LID,
2. a City LID, or
3. a combined County/City LID
• Determine the extent of road improvements which will be needed in the area and
the possible means of funding the improvements with resources from:
1. Washington County,
2. LIDs formed from existing enforceable non-remonstrance agreements,
3. Conditions of development which can be legally imposed upon future
development.
■ Determine the unfunded road improvement needs that will remain after the
revenue generating tools identified above have been exhausted.
Task Force Participants:
■ Washington County Administration
■ Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation
■ Tigard City Engineer
■ Tigard Public Works
■ Representatives of the Tigard Transportation Financing Strategies Task Force
■ CPO 4b
■ Citizens from City of Tigard and the unincorporated area (number to be
determined).
•
LM
Parks and Open Space Planning Task Force
Tasks to be worked on:
■ Review of existing publicly owned parks and open space in the unincorporated
Bull Mountain area.
■ Review of City produced documents which detail the remaining development
potential in the area.
■ Review the City report on the park deficiencies in the area.
■ Review the Parks System Development Charge (SDC) methodology and fee
structure to determine if adjustments are needed.
■ Project the remaining opportunities for Parks SDC revenue potential for the area,
based upon remaining developable lots.
■ Review County action to create a Parks SDC including the status of the effort,
potential revenue generation, and specific details of the policy implementation.
■ Calculate the total funds likely to be generated in SDCs from the area, determine
what the funds can be used for to apply to the need.
■ Based on projected SDCs to be generated, develop a draft CIP for parks and
greenway which, among other things:
o Calculates acreage to be purchased,
o Identifies a list of potential site to purchase,
o Defines the facilities which could be built/installed,
o Would be applied to develop for public use the Cache Creek property.
■ Define the difference between the facilities which could be developed and the
total need of the area using the SDC methodology as a basis.
■ Explore whether land acquisition and development for parks can and should
occur outside the area, in the UGB expansion areas or beyond.
■ Review other recreational needs and opportunities for the area other than parks
and open spaces (i.e. trails, paths, etc.).
Task Force Participants:
■ Representatives of:
o Washington County
o City of Tigard
■ Public Works - Parks Division
■ Community Development
o Tigard Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee
o CPO 4b
o Citizens of the unincorporated area and City of Tigard (number to be
determined).
Transition from Sheriff to Police Task Force
Tasks to be worked on:
■ Plan for the transition of service delivery, at the time of annexation, from
Washington County Sheriff to Tigard Police. Among the specific questions to be
answered are:
1. What level of service will be provided to the area by Tigard Police?
2. What level of service will be provided to the area by Washington County
Sheriff?
3. How will the agencies coordinate their efforts?
Task Force Participants:
■ Representatives of:
o Washington County Administration
o Washington County Sheriff
o City of Tigard Administration
o City of Tigard Finance
o City of Tigard Police
f:ladmVUVetterst20031wtdle paper task forces. doc
I ~
Memo
To: Bill Monahan, Jim Hendryx
From: Barbara Shields
RE: Bull Mountain Annexation Plan Program/Comprehensive Plan Update Task Force
Date: December 31, 2003
This memo outlines the main points related to the creation and mandate for the Bull
Mountain Subcommittee/Task Force.
As you are aware, the Planning Commission has already started the Comprehensive Plan
update discussion. The following is a summary of the Planning Commission approach:
1. Objective. To develop a good understanding of the Comprehensive Plan update
program (education) to be able to determine the time/line and resources for the Plan
update. The "program" is simply a combination of tasks/timelines and resources.
2. Scope. The scope of this learning effort will include three basic phases that must
be addressed in the Comprehensive Plan update program:
(1) preliminary issue identification/data collection;
(2) updating the plan through public involvement;
(3) adopting the plan.
3. Product. A white paper/report for Council review. The report would include:
1. work program general matrix (phases, tasks, resources),
2. discussion of resources and timelines to update the Comprehensive Plan,
3. role of the Planning Commission in implementation of the Comprehensive Plan
update program;
4. level and role of public involvement in the Comprehensive Plan update phases.
4. Timeline
January/February: Issue identification techniques/data collection
March: Major components of effective public involvement
April: Discussion of adoption process.
May: Final review of a white paper on Tigard Comprehensive
Plan update
5. Public Participation and County Involvement. The primary objective of this
project is to develop a general understanding of the Comprehensive Plan update concepts.
Given the educational emphasis of the project, public involvement will include
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Comp Plan Update Task Force.doc 1
attendance of Planning Commission worksessions which are open to any interested
citizens and subject to public meeting law. The worksession format would allow for a
broad level of citizen participation and does not favor and exclude anybody, by providing
equal opportunities for participation.
The open meeting format also allows for a county representative to effectively participate
in the process.
Planning Commission Role
As we discussed, the Planning Commission should assume the leading role in the
Comprehensive Plan Update Task Force in developing the Comprehensive Plan Update
Program for the following reasons:
1. it is the Planning Commission's legal role to advise Council on land use policy
issues;
2. assures fairness and structures broad public involvement through public meeting
law;
3. provides solid foundations for the Comprehensive Plan update process, which is
long overdue, regardless the Bull Mountain annexation.
Recommendations for the Subcommittee/Task Force Makeup and Tasks
A. Subcommittee Makeup
1. Planning Commission members;
2. Two or three interested citizens and a county representative consistently
attending Planning Commission meetings to review Planning Commission
work, learn and ask questions about the program;
B. Subcommittee Modus Operandi
1. Subject to open public meeting law
2. Planning Commission develops recommendations for Council review;
C. Subcommittee Products
1. Work Program (Concept) for the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Update
2. White paper, including a discussion of resources and timelines and the
type of public participation and Planning Commission involvement in the
Comprehensive Plan Update.
C.XWINDOWS\TEMP\Comp Plan Update Task Force.doc 2
Economic Revitalization in the Highway 217 Corridor
Agenda
January 21, 2004
7 to 9 PM
Welcome
Tom Brian, Chairman
Washington County Board of Commissioners
The Urban Renewal Process
What is it, How it Works
Jeff Tashman
Tashman Johnson LLC
Redevelopment of Commuter Rail Station Areas and the Highway
217 Corridor
Overview and Rationale
Charles Cameron, County Administrator
Concept
Jeff Tashman
Tashman Johnson LLC
Questions
Current Feasibility Study
Jeff Tashman
Tashman Johnson LLC
l 237 S t.c t 5' S}
Council Goals for 2004
Goal 1 - Financial Strategy
A. Develop and implement a sustainable long-term financial strategy for issues such as:
a. General Fund needs
b. Library
c. Transportation
d. Parks and open space
e. Washington Square regional center
f. Central Business District
g. Water system
h. Extension of urban services through anne tion
Goal 2 - Tigard Central Business District
A. Support the activities of the Downtown Tas Force as ' e i es a vision redevelopment.
B. Select a consultant to carry out the Transpo tion Gr 'wth nagement (T M) grant to create a
redevelopment plan based upon the recomme ations f Task Force 'nd Council.
C. Choose a financing mechanism, such as tax inc meet financ' , for carryi out the
redevelopment plan or vision.
D. Broaden the Task Force to include citywide repres ntation.
Goal 3 - Transportation
A. Aggressively pursue solutions to congest' n of state, o nd city acilities at cross thr gh
Tigard. I ~rveq t ;y prJ e4-
a. Reforming the Transportation R ancing Task Forc f _
5. Identify project priorities and fu ding n ds r state nd ci facilitie G~i'st
B. Continue working with Tri-Met t ca ut the emo andum o Unde tandin and identify and
fund additional improvements th a e has' on ' tra-city bus outer
C. Council ll meet with OD rese tat sat I ast on in 20 to di uss st a road
facil' es in Tig and th relate undin needs nd prio tie .
D. C uncil will continu iscu ion of he ransport tion Go I du 'ng the teg 'Planning meeting
n transportation.
Goal 4 Parks a Red ation
A. et with t Park a Recrea ' n visory ommittee
Discus the visi of the sk orce an the Cound 'to the City need for parks
nd recr tion.
b. ' cuss po ible ac isition n eds nd fina ing for the City of Tigard as well as
uni orporat Bull M ntain.
C. Discu option nd inte est in cr ating park d recreation district.
B. Continue to pa 'cipate in iscuss'ons with he Ti r ualatin School District and neighboring
cities to consider a schoo istr' is fundin needs.
C. Meet with the Skate ark Co ittee and fo mulate a plan of action.
D. Continue to support th efforts of the Youth orum.
Goal 5 - Growth Management
A. Continue Bull Mountain anne ation i rmation preparation leading to a July 2004 Council action
on the Annexation Plan.
B. Form subcommittees and review heir completed White Papers.
C. Designate a subcommittee which will review the Planned Development section of the Community
Development Code, led by the Planning Commission.
D. Develop a framework/timetable for a Comprehensive Plan update.
E. Negotiate with Washington County staff to determine who will prepare the plan and zoning for the
UGB Areas 63 and 64, and identify the source of funding for the plan.
Goal 6 - Communication
A. Increase Tigard's communication with other local officials and elected bodies through active
participation of City Council members and staff.
B. Improve and expand communication with citizens, particularly communicating successes and
future concerns.
C. Support the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow goal to maximize citizen involvement opportunities through
educational programs by implementing a citizen leadership series.
D. Investigate the possibility of supporting the mission of the Tigard Youth Advisory Council "to
empower, improve and connect the lives of Tigard's youth" by adding a youth representative to all
City boards and committees.
E. Investigate the possibility of supporting the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow strategy to "encourage
public participation through accessibility and education with an annual citizens fair for community
events and businesses."
iAadmWINcouncil goals for 2004 drakdoc
i
CITY OF TIGARD
Community Development
Shaping A Better Community
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD
TO: City Council
FROM: Gus Duenas and Jim Hendryx
DATE: January 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Resources for Council's Transportation Strategic Planning Workshop
Council is scheduled to have a Transportation Strategic Planning workshop on January
20, 2004. In an effort to help you prepare, we want to make you aware of several
resources that are either available on the web or can be made available for the meeting.
Tigard's Transportation System Plan (TSP) provides a blueprint for transportation
investments over the coming 20 years. It can be found at
www.ci.tigard.or.us/city hall/departments/engineering/transportation plan/default.asp
The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes improvements to City streets, storm and
sanitary sewer, etc. The CIP outlines potential projects over a 5 year period and is
updated each year. This can be found at
www.ci.tigard.or.us/city hall/departments/engineering/cip proiects/default.asp.
The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) established regional priorities for transportation
improvements. The RTP is administered by Metro. Tigard's TSP must conform with the
RTP. The RTP can be found at http://www.metro-region.org/article.cfm?articieid=236.
The Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Plan evaluates both short and
long-term implementation strategies for storm, transportation, natural resources, parks
and open space in the Washington Square Regional Center area. It also includes
funding needs. The summary report for the Implementation Plan can be found at
www.ci.tigard.or.us/city half/departments/cd/docs/FinalSummarvReport Consolidated.P
DF.
The Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program (MSTIP) is a Washington
County Capital Improvement Program. Since 1986, the County has been improving
major streets throughout the region. MSTIP313, currently under consideration, continues
the program and can be found at www.co.washingon.or.us/MSTIP.
TriMet has been a major focus for the City for several years with a goal of improving
transit access to the residents of Tigard. Recently, Council adopted the Memo of
Understanding, spelling out the process and commitment for Tigard and TriMet to work
together to better serve our residents. Likewise, Council adopted the Transit Action
Plan which further identifies transit priorities and needs. While these documents are not
on the web, copies can be provided.
If you would like any particular small scale maps or hard copies of any of these
documents, please advise so they can be provided.
L
i
~ i
. j
I
I
1
I
Tigard Transportation System Plan What is a TSP?
Master Plan for the next 20 years • Blue print for Transportation
Investment
• Enables City to make prudent and
effective choices regarding land use
• Coordination tool with regional and
nearby agencies
CITY OF TIGARD • Fulfills State mandate (Goal 12) & RTP
OREGON • Addresses Existing and Future needs
Why do a plan now? Steps Taken So Far to Get Here
• TSP Task Force Approved TSP
• To get ready for the future - Now - Spring 2000
• Growth • Planning Commission Recommended
- Forecasts call for 6,000 more Dwelling Units and 15,000 Approval Of TSP
more employees in the next 20 years
• Metro RTP completed in 2000 - Winter 2000
• State Requirements (new highway plan) • CIT & Public Open Houses
- Nov 2000
• New Funding Opportunities • City Council Workshops
- Nov 2000, March 2001, November 2001
Existing Conditions Transportation Goals
A
• Key bottlenecks i • Livability
today:
- ORE 99W/McDonald • Balanced Transportation System
- ORE99W/Mall-Greenburg Safety
- Hall/McDonald Performance
- Schoft Ferry/Nimbus z.
- Scholls Ferry/Halt ice' • Accessibility
-I-5/CarmanInterchange ,f..-.a . Goods Movement
l • Coordination
Capacity and Circulation Key Solution Concepts for Tigard
Key Issues
• ORE 217 and I-5 are over capacity Connectivity/ Circulation Enhancement
• Tigard serves more ORE 99W through - Washington Square
traffic in future - Tigard Triangle
- Western Tigard
• ORE 99W fails in future - East/West
• Half of the traffic signalized Traffic Operational Improvements
intersections fail in 20 years assuming - street Improvement Plan
no improvements are made - Intersection capacity upgrades
Other Modes in TSP Preliminary Cost Summary
• Rail Modes 20 year Costs
• Air Motor Vehicle: ODOT $900 M
• Water Motor Vehicle: City $250 M
• Pipeline Maintenance $45 M
• Freight Commuter Rail $75 M
Bicycle $25 M
Pedestrian $13 M
Why are these estimates so large? Potential Transportation Funding
• Over 20 years current programs would
I Motor Vehicle Ped/Bike/Transit only fund $250,000,000
Significant new • Commuter Rail • Substantial shortfall due to regional
roadway connections . Significant right-of-
and widenings way and topography nature of improvements
Major regional needs to establish bike • Key sources of future funds:
In the vicinity of lanes and sidewalks - Bond Measures (local, MSfIP, regional)
Tigard • Leek of on-going - Increase existing fees commensurate with needs (sDc)
programs for - Focus on high priority needs
sidewalks,TDM, - Exactions
Traffic Signals - Roadway pridng
2
1
OKS Assoaafos
i 1• I 41L I~.I 7.~j:p I an®
Additional Issues and Major Impacts; Transportation
•p. Sys stems Plan i
• Walnut Extension
• Scholls Ferry Road Widening
- > lanes, south of Hail (122 foot right-of-way) i.r •.-•;p: ` +
• Hall Boulevard Widening - z; f° -
- up to 5 lanes (98 foot right-of-way) _
• New Functional Classification
(Neighborhood Route)
r; I
• Transit Service 1-- + "Ili'• ` I x .a~..rr
' . ~n.„..YWMn' t.~r;^ ^ 'I ROW Y~YnmtlM
DKS A4soaa183 DKS Al-.f.3
' - Transportation Transportation
Systems PlPlan Systems Plan
j I w w
i r t 7 I
ilFi ~rt % q- 'cr'..~RY.awsnao•.r I•'I 1 • s.,..u
f~s.~w.•s n
Summary
• Provides Master Plan for next 20 years
• Consistent with the Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP) 1 A
77
• TSP and Comprehensive Plan " -
amendments meet all applicable -
standards
• Staff to return in Spring with
Development Code amendments
• All comments received addressed in
comment log