Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Packet - 11/26/2002
TIGRD CI COUNCIL FETING November 26, 2002 COUNCIL MEETING ILL E TELEVISED H:Veannie%docsVxpk13 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 A&Adix- Revised 11-26-02 Mayor's Agenda PUBLIC NOTICE: CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503- 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA - November 26, 2002 page i AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 26, 2002 6:30 PM 6 STUDY SESSION > UPDATE ON URBAN SERVICES AGREEMENT REQUIRED BY SENATE BILL 122 > DISCUSSION OF THE DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE Mayor: e EXECUTIVE SESSION.• The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss current or potential litigation under ORS 192.660(lh). All discussions are confdential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications & Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 7:35 PM 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) COUNCIL AGENDA - November 26, 2002 page 2 7:45 PM 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve Council Minutes for October 29, 2002 Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 7:50 PM 4. CONSIDER ADOPTING THE WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER FUNDING STRATEGY a. Staff Report: Community Development Staff b. Council Discussion C. Council Consideration: Resolution No. Councilor: I move for adoption of the proposed resolution. Councilor: I second the motion. Mayor: Will the City Recorder please read the number and title of the Resolution. City Recorder: (Reads as requested.) Mayor. Is there any discussion? Mayor (after discussion): All of those in favor of adopting Resolution No. , please say "aye. " Councilors: Mayor: All of those opposed to adopting Resolution No. , please say "nay. " Councilors: Mayor. Resolution No. _(is adopted or fails) by a (unanimous, or however votes were split) vote. COUNCIL AGENDA - November 26, 2002 page 3 8:20 PM 5. PRESENTATION ON SKATE PARK FACILITY DESIGN a. Staff Report: Public Works Staff b. Council Discussion 8:50 PM 6. CONSIDER FORMING THE DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE AND APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE TASK FORCE a. Staff Report: Community Development Staff b. Council Discussion C. Council Consideration: Resolution No. QN. 7 Councilor. I move for adoption of the proposed resolution. Councilor. I second the motion. Mayor: Will the City Recorder please read the number and title of the Resolution. City Recorder. (Reads as requested.) Mayor: Is there any discussion? Mayor (after discussion): All of those in favor of adopting Resolution No. , please say "aye. it Councilors: Mayor: All of those opposed to adopting Resolution No. , please say "nay. " Councilors: Mayor: Resolution No. _(is adopted or fails) by a (unanimous, or however votes were split) vote. 8:55 PM 7. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 9:00 PM 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS COUNCIL AGENDA - November 26, 2002 page 4 9:05 PM 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9:15 PM 10. ADJOURNMENT I:\ADM\CATHY\CCA\021128. DOC COUNCIL AGENDA - November 26, 2002 page 5 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS FOR REVIEW November 26, 2002 The Study Session & held In the Red Rock Creek Conference Room. Enter at the back of Town Hall. The Coundl encourages Interested citizens to attend all or part of the meeting. If the number of attendees exceeds the capacity of the Conference Room, the Coundl may move the Study Session to the Town Hall. 0 STUDY SESSION UPDATE ON URBAN SERVICES AGREEMENT REQUIRED BY SENATE BILL 122 ➢ DISCUSSION OF THE DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE (Added to the study session agenda) 0 EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss current and potential litigation under ORS 192.660(1 h). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. (Added to the agenda) ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS o Revised Agenda - Addition of Downtown Task Force Discussion in study session and executive session o Distribution of City Limits map o County-wide election results o Reminder about airport shuttle service pick-up schedule in 2002 NLC Conference file folders Executive Session - The Public Meetings Law authorizes governing bodies to meet in executive session in certain limited situations (ORS 192.660). An "executive session" is defined as "any meeting or part of a meeting of a governing body, which Is dosed to certain persons for deliberation on certain matters." Permissible Purposes for Executive Sessions: 192.660 (1) (a) - Employment of public officers, employees and agents, If the body has satisfied certain prerequisites. 192.660(l) (b) - Discipline of public officers and employees (unless affected person requests to have an open hearing). 192.660(l) (c) - To consider matters pertaining to medical staff of a public hospital. 192.660 (1) (d) - Labor negotiations. (News media can be excluded in this Instance.) 192.660(l) (e) - Real property transaction negotiations. 192.660(l) (0- Exempt public records - to consider records that are "exempt by law from public inspection." These records are specifically Identified in the Oregon Revised Statutes. 192-6600) (g) - Trade negotiations - involving matters of trade or commerce in which the governing body Is competing with other governing bodies. 192.6600) (h) - Legal counsel - Executive session are appropriate for consultation with counsel concerning legal rights and duties regarding current litigation or litigation likely to be filed. 192.660(l) (1) - To review and evaluate, pursuant to standards, criteria, and policy directives adopted by the governing body, the employment-related performance of the chief executive officer, a public officer, employee or staff member unless the affected person requests an open hearing. The standards, criteria and policy directives to be used in evaluating chief executive officers shall be adopted by the governing body in meetings open to the public in which there has been an opportunity for public comment. 192.660 (1) (j) - Public investments - to carry on negotiations under ORS Chapter 293 with private persons or businesses regarding proposed acquisition, exchange or liquidation of public Investments. 192.660 (1) (k)- Relates to health professional regulatory board. 1:1AD M\CATHY\COUNCI L\CCLIST\021112.D OC ~OIi-26-2002 01:03PM FROM-WASHINGTON COUNTY ELECTIONS +5038465810 ~~Z=26~u 001/OD3- ~ 5~ 111 OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF THE GENERAL ELECTION ON NOVEKBER , 34-54 COUNTY LIBRARY LOL Page Number 135.084.00 1 u u E 4 E 4 0 I N s N 5 5 U 4 T U E T T C C E P U U D R T T v C Y y m T L L a E 1 1 S E R A A R R y Y u L 0 L O m $ : c 21 v a u 01 RURAL NU COUNTY 203 13 .1 54 761 02 KINNAMAN 2021 124 61.8' 51 Sq j 65 03 WITCH HAZEL 35 2 76.1 11 15 _ n 04 BUTTERNUT 255 16,21 63.5 692 1 83 05 BANKS 74 4 63.1 21 23 06 TANASBOURNE 53 35 65. 1- 12 07 WILLOW CREEK 163 1081 66.1 50 52 08 BLOOMING FERN NiLL 484 3 77. 17 1 0' 09 HAWTHORNE FARMS 162 9891 60.$ 51 42 Z 10 DILLEY I 1297 1 9121 70.3 34 5 ~ 11 LAURELWOOD 5. 3721 63.4' 12 22 u^ 2 HAGG LAKE - 741 51 70.0 1 329 1 Z a 3 H ILLS80R0-UNINCORP 4 R 3 271 726 11 137 1 GLENCOE 1 73 51 69.8 2 287 1 ° v 15 HELVETIA 60 46 77.3 20 231 a 16 PUMPKIN RIDGE 95 70 73. _ 26 403 1 1 17 VERBOORT 39 29 73. 81 199 1 18 MINTER BRIDGE 220 1525169.1% 6 76 19 QUATAMA STREET 79 479 59. 2 18 Tigard Precincts: 20 ASELDALE 1 11171 64. 54 21 GASTON 24 1261 51.6 3 400, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 22 JACKTOWN 223 15 71.3 a 408 409 416 23 INDIAN HILLS 325 195 60 0 91 94 , , 24 CHERRY GROVE 42 . 2 64.0 10 14 25 HILLSBORO-ISLANDS 3411 700.0 1 - ' 26 RURAL BANKS - 131 95 72. 35 5391 Ti 27 BROWN )RIDDLE SC 6 gard-Tualatin School District Precincts: HOOL 260 17 5.5 77 83 28 FARMINGTON VIEW 1323NI 90 68.0 3 51 396, 397 399 400 402 403 404 405 406 408 29 CENTURY SCHOOL 287 17 61. a771 , , , , , , , , , ORTH PLAINS 30 N 86 59 68.9' 21 33 41 0, 413, 414, 415, 417, 419, 420, 423, 428, 433, 31 PORTLAND /BARNES 31 66.6 436 437 438 441 32 ORENCO STATION 2D31 144 71` 76 6 , , , 33 JOHN OLSEN 2 6 W34 1291 !.8_9' 82 39 34 DIXIE MOUNTAIN 11 9 80.8' 41 35 JACKSON SCHOOL 32 231 71.3' 107 111 36 FAIR GROUNDS 237 154A 65.2' 73 75 37 WALNUT ST 32 202 61.8 89 104 8 CORNELIUS 335 189 56.4;4 1 69 109 39 FOREST GROVE-EAST 404 2 61. 1081 122 0 FOREST GROVE-WEST 4'01 . 2 69.2 11 14 41 CORNELIUS-SCHEFFLIN 31 2 72 2• 6 15 42 DAVID HILT. RD 21 _ 1 76.1 741 81 OSERRY 3461 227 65. 1061 111 , LLSBORO CENTRAL 293 182 62.0' 88 851 HILLSBORO-uNINCOR 12 7A 731 59 8 31 4 . ' RNELIUS TU . . AL RIVE 24 41 1 73.3 111 1 , /TUALATIN RIVER 3 2 75.0 1 a ! KE OSWEGO 11 T 7 65.5 331 31 1 - ; - : DIVISIQN STREET 205 122 ~ [ 59 5 5 ~ R GROVE 37 25 68. 12 113 OHA PARK 1931 110 5 45 AVER70N-CENTER 591 28 48.5 15 104 LKER ROAD-SOUTH 1460 9901 53 EHALEM SCHOOL 3301 23491 71.1 108 M ADOW PARK 292 195 66. V66 8 OHA-WEST 1501 94 62. 45 45 - 57 HERITAGE PARK_ 1521 9 63.3 44 45 58 SEMINOLE ESTATES 94 62 66.8% 31 281 59 WATERHOUSE 374 241 64.6 123 104 60 PHEASANT CANE 1 1191 63.0 55 591 - AOV-26-2002 01:03PM FROM-WASHINGTON COUNTY ELECTIONS +5038465810 T-206 P.002/003 F-158 - OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF THE GENERAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER , X34-54 COUNTY LIBRARY LOL eoe Number 136.OB4.00 1 E G T R E D 0 S U U R R U U T T F, E E G E 4 E - S 4 D N Y R A Y L 0 4 0 4 O N Y R A Y L 0 61 MILLMAN 7 49 52. 22 155 1 62 CEDAR HILLS 334 24231 72.4% 1 13 900 1 BARNES RD 302 20661 68.2X 1 122 724 1 364 MCDANIEL RD 316 23 75.1% 132 933 1 %5 LEAHY RD fib NEST TUALATIN VIEW b7TflDMPSON RD 284 144 204 2251 79.0% 9251 64.0% 1521 74.3 132 53. 75 812 323 684 1 1 68 SOMERSET 69 COLUMBIA AVE 3_ -1-6-7-q. 211 69.1 1208 72.2% 10 6 93 46 70 ROCK CREEK 1891 13991 73. 71 61 71 OAK HILLS 1943 1 145 74.6 8 499 72 RIDGEWOOD SCHOOL 160 126 78.8% 72 471 7'S CORNELIUS PASS 360 26 72.2' 101 14 74 JACOBSDN RD 50.0 1 75 PORTLAND CITY 21 13 65.0 71 6 i 76 WESTVIEW 1741 1237 70. 681 4 77 BETHANY 78 CANYON LN 79 HALL BLVD 425 934 2944 30 72.5 75 80.1 199 67_ 144 40 94 144 29 921 - - i 80 HIGHLAND PARK 202221 140 69.6 681 64 81 BEAVERTON/CENTER ST 187 113 60.6 5 4 82 GREENWAY 26721 1 62.3 83 71 83 BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE 12151 8 72.1 49 3251 84 GARDEN HOME 225801 16 74. 921 65 85 PORTLAND GOLF CLUB 26951 2011 74.6 11 6921 86 RALEIGH PARK 31091 24 79.3 1571 7561 87 SUNSET CORRIDOR 991 86.8• 3 421 88 WHITFORD 8 61 68.5' 2 89 SEXTON MOUNTAIN 272 185 68.1' 8 90 90 SOUTHRIDGE 317 22 69.5 1 100, 91 PORTLAND CITY 23 7 58.3 _ 81 3 92 PORTLAND CTY CON 2 2 12 58.3' 7 3 93 MONTCLAIR 521 39 .4% 23 134, 94 CORNELIUS EAST 44.4' 95 MURRAYHILL 209 140 67. 61 687 96 DURHAM 72 53 73.9 24 --5- 97 BULL MOUNTAIN 21 158 72.1 98 COOPER MOUNTAIN 6 51 76.8 207AI 26 99 METZGER 184 118 63. 5091 5871 00 WASHINGTON SQUARE 22621 149 66.2 6 791 01 MAYO STREET 148191 11% 74.4' 611 4331 02 TIGARD WALNUT ST 65 46 70.4' 19 25 03 TIGARD GAARDE ST 3291 71.8 1361 04 FOWLER SCHOOL 22651 152 67-314 5 8531 05 TWALITY SCHOOL 3370 2394 70.9• 101 1241 06 TIGARD CITY HALL 07 NORTH BARNES 283 75 17 62.8' 5_ 76.2 ' 77 321 90 22 08 SIMIMERFIELD 41 315 76:6 12 1687 09 SUMMERLAKE-WEST 197 1281 64.8 56 62 - 10 BEEF BEND RO 144 10 73. 42 57 11 SCHOLLS HEIGHTS 9971 53 53. 2 Z391 - 12 COOPER MT SCHOOL 13 FISCHER\PACIFIC HWY 16691 291 11 68.5 2 75.8' 5 5511 121 1 1 14 BARROWS RD 11141 681 61.1 28 3471 15 BEEF BEND/131ST 4451 391 87.8' 14 209 16 SLMMERLAKE-EAST 17 ELDORADO 152 13691 10 65.8 91 66.8' 43 4 50 429 X18 HART ROAD 27 17 64.921 b 419 KING CITY 1 142 82. 56 7 420 TUALATIN CITY 302 213 70.6 10i 99 OOV-26-2002 01:04PM FROM-WASHINGTON COUNTY ELECTIONS 1 +5038465810 T-206 P.003/003 F-158 34 . 54 COUNP OFFICIAL S A LIBRARY EM N LOL O HE-GENERAL ELECIICN 0 HOVEM , 34.5 aee Number 137.084.001 R I T E E o 0 R S U R 0 T U 0 T P E 2 A G E y E r ffi 4 C U a TV 18 R A Y L 0 ! 3, 0 4 C U N T 1, A R Y L 0 • • 21 TRI-CITIES 1151 7 1 Cal 22 FG NORTH/UNIHCORP 22 14 5 23 TUALATIN-NORTH 255 15 7 66 24 NN SHERN000 CITY 25 SHERNOOD-UNINCORP 4 5 2 42 j 1 15 151 5 26 GRONER 2 69 0 27 SCHOLLS 123 88 3 52 28 TUALATIN-NEST 10 649ql Z9 31 29 MILLER HILL 15 100 65-414 399 5 1 30 BALD PEAK 394 1 2 72.5• ' 1351 3 31 MOUNTAIN HOME 14491 111 76.6 60 32 WILSONVILLE _ 100.0 33 ED BYRON SCHOOL _20 14 " 72.1 68 70 34 ERROL HASSELL 2510 195 67.3_ 87 961 35 SE SHERWOOD CITY 3161 214 67_, 112 36 TUALATIN CITY 81 62 T72 2 37 i,0ELBROOK 7 61 82.4 2 3 138 SE COUNTY 54 381 70.1 12 2201 39 PCC 2 _ 161 7Q.5 81 80 40 HILLSBORO-SOUTH 0.0 4 41 PORTLAND CITY 3 61. 2 -11 42 KEMMER RD 5371 35 66.4 15 1 43 JENKINS/BASELINE 1131 6 54_ 3 27 44 SPRINGVILLE 173E 11 66. 59 51 45 SCHOLLS HTS N 37 23 62.6% 12 46 LOMBARD 10371 68j 65. 33 3141 47 HWY 217 EAST 2301 IT 66.5 48 CEDAR HILLS 3201 131 40. 4 49 CANYOHj217~ 2 1 63.6 50 WALKER RD 600 4 76.6 21 21 51 GRABHORN 471 2 60.5 11 15 52 JOHNSON\185TH 230 131 56.8 621 59 53 BASELINE/185TH 3 1 32.1. 54 BULL NT SPLIT 0. T 0 T A L S 2855 15500 67.81 7260 7321 1 NOV-26-2002 04:10PN FROM-WASHINGTON COUNTY ELECTIONS +5038465810 `200 tP 0Q2/004 F1-182 D Z ~8, 3, NOV-26-2002 04:1015M FROM-WASHINGTON COUNTY ELECTIONS +5038465810 Y-208 P.003/004 F-162 OFFIC AL STATEMENT OF THE GENERAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 34-56 COUNTY EXHIBITION age Number 139.085.001 E 6 U U 4 4 0 G R R S 6 S 0 0 6 T U U E T T C C R 0 0 D R Y T Y Y 0 E T N E E S B B E 1 1 I 1 0 0 N N 1 MILLIKAN 78 4121 52.8% 13 2 ^ 2 CEDAR HILLS 24 72.4 75 14 BARNES RD 63 302 20661 68.2 67 121 1 4 MCOANIEL RD '316 237 75.1 65 155 5 LEARY RD 284 2251 79.0 682 139 6 NEST TUALATIN VIEW 144 92 64.0 2 52 y 7 THOMPSON RD 204 1521 74.3 37 104 68 SOMERSET 3 211 69.1 61 133 69 COLUMBIA AVE 1671 120 72. 40 71 _ 70 ROCK CREEK 1891 13991 73. 4531 85 71 oAK HILLS 194 5 74 6 I 49201 85 72 RIDGEWOOD SCHOOL ~ , 160 - - 126 78.8° 37 76 73 CORNELIUS PASS 36 26 722 16 74 JACOBSON RD U SO 1 75 PORTLAND CITY 21 . 13 65.0% 3; 9 7 76 WESTVIEW 1741 1231 70. 381 751 ' 77 BETHANY 425 30861 72.S% 771 2062 78 CANYON LN 75 80.1 20 4 79 HALL BLVD 294 19061 67. 63 119 80 HIGHLAND PARK 20221 1403 69.6% 3 891 81 BEAVERTON/CENTER ST 187 11371 60.6% 3M 65 _ 82 GREENWAT 2672 1 1666 62.3% 1 5121 102 83 BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE 121 8771 72.1% 277 1 4991 84 GARDEN HOME 225 16 74. 483 1 105 CLUB RTLAND GOLF 83 P 26 201 7L.6 635 1 11551 ' ` - O 86 RALEIGH PARK 31 2 79.3 72 15011 $7 SUNSET CORRIDOR _ 86.8 20 1 5 88 WHITFORD - - 6i 68.5 23 1 32 1 •89 SEXTON MOUNTAIN _ 272 185 68.1 50 1195 1 90 SOUTHRIDGE 317 220 69.5 6414 1377 1 91 PORTLAND CITY 23 13 58.3 4Z W 92 PORTLAND CITY CON 2 20 1221 58.31 4 31 1 8 _ 93 MONTCLAIR 521 39 75.4% 11 23 94 CORNELIUS EAST 5 9 44_4 1 95 MURRAYHILL 209 140 67.0 35 92 96 DURHAM 72 53 73. _ 13 361 . 97 BULL MOUNTAIN 21 1587, 72.1 _ . 32 11 98 COOPER MOUNTAIN 6 51 76.8 14 33 99 METZGER 184 118 63. 2 781 00 WASHINGTON SQUARE 226 149 66. 357 AI 102 01 MAYO STREET 148 110 74.4 29 72 _ 02 TIGARD/WALNUT ST 65 619 70.4• 12 3 03 TIGARD/GAARDE ST 329 23 71.8• 47 171 04 FOWLER SCHOOL 226 51 1524 67.3 3 104 05 TWALITY SCHOOL 33 239 70. 63 157 06 TIGARD CITY HALL 283 91 17062.8 4 11714 1 _ 07 NORTH BARNES 75 5 7MO 76_2° 1 36 91 _ 08 SUMMERFIELD 41 315 76.6 T7 209 09 SUMMERLAKE,-WEST _ 197 ,,,1281 _64.8 82 ~ 91 '10 BEEF BEND RD 14 '10 73.8 2 71 11 SCHOOL$ HE1GM S 99 53 53.8 15 33 _ 12 COOPER NT SCHOOL 166 114 68.5 /44 27 7fU 13 FISCHER WACIFIC HWY 2 75.8 2 1 14 BARROWS RD 111 61 61.1 p 14 47 1 15 REEF BEkp%131ST 44 _ 391 87.8 9 61 25 _ 16 %WERLAKE-EAST 152 51 100 65.8 29 1 62 17 ELDORADO 1 91 .8 25 5 18 HART ROAD 27 1 64. 4 12 4 19 KING CITY 1 142 82- 34 86 20 TUALATIN CITY 302 213 70.6 5 14 I NOV-26-2002 04:11PM FRO41-WASHINGTON COUNTY ELECTIONS +5038465810 T-208 P.004/004 F-162 OFFICIAL S ATE14EWT OF THE GENERAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 51 34-56 COUNTY EXHIBITION Page Number 140.085.001 R G 1 T R E Q V 0 E R S U R N U T U R N U T P E C E T A G E 4 E - S 5 6 U 0 N Y X H I 0 T I 0 N 4 0 5 6 0 U N Y X H I 8 T I 0 N I 21 TRI-CITIES 1 1 8B. 1 1 22 FG WORTH/UMINCORP 22 1401 61.17d 4 91 23 TUALATIN-NORT11 255 15 61.LPA 4 971 _ 24 L5 SHERWOOD CITY 4D81 2 67.91 5 1941 25 SHERWOOD LM INCORP 587 4271 72.7% 311 26 GROWER 2 1 69_ 5 121 27 SCHOLLS 123 8871 71.6% 30 54 28 TUALATIN-NEST 104 6491 62.0% 15 441 29 HILLER HILL 153 100 6 5.4 2% 6551 30 BALD PEAK 39 2 _ 72.5 1 1611 31 MOUNTAIN HOME 1449 1 111 76.6 35 66 32 WILSMILLE 2 1 100.0 1 1 33 ED BYROM SCHOOL 204341 47 72.7 3 10321 34 ERROL HASSELL 290 195 67.3 58 12301 35 SE SHERWOOD CITY _ 3161 214 67. 47 15071 36 TUALATIN CITY 62 77 _ 11 47 _ 37 HA2EBROOK 7 61 82.4 1 38 SE COUNTY _ _ 56 -381 70.1 8 2591 39 PCC _ 1 70_5 4 111 _ 40 H1_LLSBORO-SOUTH 0. 1 PORTLAND CITY 6 3 61.9 321 42 KEMMER RD 53 35 66.4% 239 3 JENKINS/BASELINE 1131 6 54. 201 34 44 SPRINGVILLE 17391 11 66_ 3121 7641 45 SCHOLLS HTS N 37 23 62.6 621 1521 LQMBARD _ 103 b5_ 2 41 7 HUY 217 EAST_ ~ 23 15 66.5 4t4 861 CEDAR HILTS 32 131 721 9 CANYON/217 2 1 63.6 - 50 WALKER RD 4 76.6% 11 2 51 GRABHORN 471 28 60.5 761 1 _ 52 JOHNSONX185TH 23031 131 56. 4 7 53 BASELINE/185TH 371 1 32.4% 1 54 BULL MT SPLIT 21 1 0.0 - , o"+ Y 0 T A L S w*~M 2855 5500 67. 4586 972021 i Agenda Item No. 0, Meeting of f - 19 - D 3 MINUTES TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 26, 2002 Mayor Griffith called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Council Present: Mayor Griffith; Councilors Dirksen, Moore, and Scheckla. STUDY SESSION: > UPDATE ON URBAN SERVICES AGREEMENT (USA) REQUIRED BY SENATE BILL 122 Community Development Director Jim Hendryx introduced this item. Mr. Hendryx advised Senate Bill 122 requires counties to coordinate service provider agreements for areas that may be annexed and to identify who the ultimate service provider will be for the area. Such an agreement is a requirement of proceeding with the annexation plan. A discussion regarding the condition, maintenance, and jurisdiction of area roads ensued. Mr. Hendryx commented Tigard would be one of the first cities to sign the agreement. Beaverton and Hillsboro will be entering into similar agreements. Mr. Hendryx noted this USA is separate and in addition to the existing USA. Unlike the existing USA, the current agreement is related to the eventual annexation of the area and will be in effect indefinitely. The Council discussed the agencies which were listed as parties to the agreement. Mr. Hendryx stated the agreement would be ready for the Council's consideration at its December 10, 2002 meeting. > DISCUSSION OF THE DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE The Council expressed concern that the resolution they would be considering this evening was more restrictive in terms of timelines and tasks than they TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - November 26, 2002 page 1 had envisioned. Mr. Monahan proposed additional language to address the Council's concerns. The resolution was revised. e ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS: The agenda was revised to include the discussion of the Downtown Task Force in study session and an executive session. A map detailing city limits was distributed to the Council. County-wide election results were distributed. City Manager Monahan noted the Washington County Cooperative Library Services local operating levy was defeated by 600 votes. Tigard voters did not support this measure. The county exhibition center was rejected throughout the county. Election results are on file in the City Recorder's Office. The Council was reminded about airport shuttle service for the NLC Conference. Mr. Monahan mentioned there may be people interested in testifying about item 5, the Skate Park Facility Design. He suggested the Council may want to consider this item prior to other items on the agenda. EXECUTIVE SESSION: > The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 7:03 p.m. to discuss current and potential litigation and under ORS 192.660(1 h). EXECUTIVE SESSION recessed at 7:12 p.m. STUDY SESSION resumed at 7:12 p.m. > The Council discussed public testimony regarding agenda item 5. It was noted this item was not a public hearing and testimony should be limited to comments regarding the skate park facility design. STUDY SESSION recessed at 7:17 p.m. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - November 26, 2002 page 2 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 The meeting of the Tigard City Council 8i Local Contract Review Board was called to order by Mayor Griffith at 7:36 p.m. 1.2 Council Present: Mayor Griffith, Councilors Dirksen, Moore, and Scheckla 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications 81 Liaison Reports - None 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items Note: Item 5 -Skate Park Facility Design - was heard at this time 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA: No visitors testified. See Item 5 for those who signed visitor's agenda and testified regarding the Skate Park. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: 3.1 Approve Council Minutes for October 29, 2002 The motion was approved by a unanimous vote: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Scheckla - Yes 4. CONSIDER ADOPTING THE WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER FUNDING STRATEGY a. Community Development Director Jim Hendryx introduced Associate Planner Julia Hajduk and described how the Long Range Planning Division was developing detailed work programs covering financing, parks and open spaces, transportation demand management, and stormwater relating to the Washington Square Regional Center Plan. This discussion addresses the first work program, financing. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - November 26, 2002 page 3 Ms. Hadjuk gave a PowerPoint presentation. Her presentation is on file with the City Recorder's office. b. Councilor Dirksen verified the Funding Strategy Is conceptual in nature. City Manager Monahan stated the Strategy directs staff to research three aspects of funding: existing fees, new fees, and urban renewal. Council will be asked to give consideration to specific funding decisions at a later date when more detailed information is available. Mr. Hendryx asserted the Funding Strategy will serve as a communication tool with Beaverton and Washington County. He confirmed neither of these jurisdictions have approved their regional center plans, but plans are scheduled on their work programs. Councilor Scheckla reminded the Council urban renewal required voter approval per Tigard's Charter. Discussion of the procedure to implement urban renewal ensued. In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Hendryx reported Tigard has established the boundaries of its jurisdiction for the Regional Center. The county and Beaverton will establish boundaries when they go through the process of adopting their plans. Councilor Scheckla inquired about an additional commuter rail station in Tigard. Mr. Hendryx explained a station originally planned north of Scholis Ferry Road in Beaverton will now be constructed in Tigard, just south of Scholis Ferry Road. Possible benefits of the additional Tigard station were discussed briefly. C. Motion by Councilor Dirksen, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt Resolution No. 02-71 RESOLUTION NO. 02-71 - A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER FUNDING STRATEGY TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - November 26, 2002 page 4 The motion was approved by a unanimous vote: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Scheckla - Yes 5. PRESENTATION ON SKATE PARK FACILITY DESIGN At the opening of this agenda item, Mayor Griffith reminded the audience that testimony should be limited to comments regarding the skate park facility design. a. Parks Manager Dan Plaza introduced this item and indicated he was seeking Council approval of the skate park facility design. Mr. Plaza described the process involved in developing the design, various phases of the design, and cost estimates. Mr. Plaza added the design has "street features" was "kid driven." The design has been reviewed and approved by two of the city's insurance representatives. b. Mayor Griffith confirmed BMX bikes will also be able to use the park, and the design could be adapted to any location. In response to a question from Councilor Dirksen, Tyler VanDomelen, an audience member, described how the bowl design functions as a half-pipe. Rich Carlson, Chairperson of the Skate Park Task Force, commented how the design was the result of the kids' input. He encouraged the kids to come up with a fresh and progressive design, in essence to create their ideal skate park. Mr. Carlson asked the Council to hear comments from some of the kids who had worked on the skate park design. Ralph Anzellotti, 11942 SW 113d' Place, Tigard, inquired about wetland impacts, sidewalks, noise barriers, fencing, etc. Councilor Moore interjected that when a potential site is identified, the construction of the park will be subject to the same process as any other development. Site-specific issues such as the ones mentioned by Mr. Anzellotti would be addressed at that time. Mr. Anzellottl proposed round-the-clock site supervision be included as part of the design. Councilor Moore reiterated the Council was only considering the skate park design and once a potential site was identified, there would be opportunities for site-related public comments. There was a brief discussion TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - November 26, 2002 page 5 regarding other skate parks and residential supervision. City Manager Monahan Inquired whether the house used for residential supervision of the Newberg skate park was in place before the skate park was created. Steve Andrews, 12064 SW 113' Place, Tigard, concurred with Mr. Anzellotti's request for 24-hour-a-day supervision at the park. He stated the house used for residential supervision in Newberg existed prior to the skate park. He continued by saying in Newberg, a parks department employee supervises the site during the day. Mr. Andrews suggested without such supervision, the skate park could become a problem area. He encouraged the Council to consider supervision as part of the skate park design. Tyler VanDomelem, 15830 SW Colony Drive, Tigard, discussed the skate park design and how the groups' vision and feedback was incorporated into the design by the consultants. Mr. VamDomelen described some of the features of the park, and stated the group had done a good job on the design. Michael Layoun, 13792 SW Leaha Terrace, Tigard, testified he loves the skate park design. Others who have seen the design share his enthusiasm. He pointed out the design combines ramp and street features. He added this skate park would be one of the best in the area. Jacob Farrier, 11565 SW 90' Avenue, stated he was a skateboarder and he described the obstacles in the design. He asserted the design was totally unique, unlike any other park in Oregon. Sam Carlson, 11475 SW Venus Court, remarked he liked how the design contained street features. He added most skate parks are composed of vertical features. Greg Nicholson, 14120 SW 97' Place, Tigard, explained how some features of the park were adjustable to accommodate various skill levels of skaters. Zach Leary, Richard Peloquin, and Lily Peloquin had signed the visitor's agenda, but subsequently declined to speak. Sue Beilke, 11755 SW 1141' PI., Tigard, inquired about the cost of the architect. Mr. Plaza responded the architect was paid $12,000 from city park and recreation funds. Ms. Beilke commended the kids for their work and enthusiasm, but expressed concern over the cost and size of the skate park. She TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - November 26, 2002 page 6 stated the design was too ambitious and she would rather see money used for other programs, such as school programs. C. Councilor Moore commented the park was expected to be funded through donations. Mr. Plaza added city funds were available should more design work be needed. Michael Layoun and Tyler VanDomelen described how more advanced skateboarders help beginners. Mr. VanDomelen expressed concern about overcrowding should the size of the park be scaled back. Mayor Griffith remarked the donations would dictate the size of the park. Mr. Layoun described his dedication to getting the park built. Rich Carlson advised the Council both Newburg and Tualatin indicated they would build larger skate park facilities if they had it to do over again. Mr. Carlson discussed fund raising strategies. He did not rule out a request for a contribution for the city. He talked about the need for the park and said it was appropriate for the city to embark on a project of this scale. Nick Wilson, Councilor-elect, 12573 SW Winterlake Dr., inquired about constructing the project in phases and how the phases would be transitioned. Mr. Wilson suggested initial phases should look like a finished product, since subsequent phases may or may not become a reality. He continued by asking that drainage and the depth or shallowness of the site be taken into account. Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Dirksen, to accept the Conceptual Master Plan for the Skate Park. City Manager Monahan asked the Council to clarify whether it wanted to include any supervision criteria as a part of the Master Plan. Councilor Moore stated this type of stipulation was premature and should be considered later in the process when a site had been identified and the Council was ironing out the details of the park. Mayor Griffith concurred. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Scheckla - Yes TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - November 26, 2002 page 7 Note: The Council returned to Item 2 - Visitor's Agenda- at this time 6. CONSIDER FORMING THE DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE AND APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE TASK FORCE a. Community Development Director Jim Hendryx introduced this item. He stated the idea behind the Task Force was to use the downtown commuter rail station as a catalyst for other improvements. Mr. Hendryx noted the resolution under consideration had been revised in study session, and proposed changes to the resolution were outlined. b. Councilor Dirksen, liaison to the downtown group, recommended approval of the resolution saying it was consistent with the direction the Council wished to go. Mayor Griffith described his recent opportunity to travel on the commuter rail train. He stated the rail cars were plush and the 45 mph ride was smooth. He was impressed. Mr. Hendryx read the names of the Task Force appointees from the resolution and described their backgrounds. The group meets in Town Hall on the third Thursday of the month from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. The public is encouraged to attend meetings. Mr. Hendryx noted traffic analysis, circulation needs and commuter rail station design had been discussed at the last meeting. Mr. Hendryx described how the group had taken photographs of the commuter rail line and possible station features from other cities, then voted for their preferences and identified the key components they would like to see incorporated into the Tigard station. Mr. Hendryx concluded by saying that ultimately a design package would come back to the Task Force and then general design guidelines would be presented to the Council. C. Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt Resolution No. 02-72 as amended RESOLUTION NO. 02-72 - A RESOLUTION TO FORM THE DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE AND APPOINT MEMBERS TO THE TASK FORCE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - November 26, 2002 page 8 The motion was approved by a unanimous vote: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Scheckla - Yes 7. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS: None. 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS: None. 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: No Executive Session was held. 10. BUSINESS MEETING adjourned at 9:02 p.m. Attest: \\TI G333\US R\D EPTS\ADM\CATHY\CCM\021126. D OC eer A. aston, Deputy ity Recorder TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - November 2+6, 2002 page 9 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor Griffith, Councilor Dirksen, Councilor-Elect Wilson & City Manager Monahan FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder6 DATE: November 22, 2002 SUBJECT: CMS Airport Shuttle Attached is information about the airport shuttle to and from Portland airport. Here's a summary of pick up and return information: Name of shuttle service: C.M.S. Airport Shuttle (Jeff), telephone - 503-992-8585 Mayor & Mrs. Griffith will be picked up at 8 a.m. on Monday, December 2. Councilor Dirksen will be picked up at 8 a.m. on Tuesday, December 3. City Manager Monahan will be picked up at 2:15 p.m. on Wednesday, December 4. (Councilor-elect Wilson will get to the airport on his own.) For return: Everyone is returning on the same flight (arrival time Sunday, December 8,12:06 p.m.). There is one shuttle for all. After you get your baggage, please go to the outside information booth and advise that the "Bill Monahan party" for the C.M.S. Airport Shuttle is ready to go. I have prepaid the shuttle service. 1:1ADEACATHY\000NCILICONFEREN\SHU TLE PICK UP hAEMO.DOC F National League of Cities Conference 2002 Departures/Arrivals C.M.S. Airport Shuttle (Jeff) telephone # 503-992-8585 fax # 503-648-8540 Shuttle to and from the airport has been prepaid by Cathy Wheatley. To Portland Airport: re,.,..,...U- 1 _ C16, uiv arrive for Mavor & Mrs. Griffith at 8 a.m. IVIVIKU62 , LctcaaaaJCa + Name . - - Departure Date Departure Time Airline & Flight Carolyn Griffith Mon., December 2 10:30 AM Delta 1257 Jim Griffith & Mon., December 2 10:30 AM Delta 1257 Carolyn Griffith 10915 SW Fairhaven Way Tigard, OR 97223 Home # 503-639- 8629 d D b 3 - Shuttle will arrive for Councilor Dirksen at 8 a.m. Tues ay, ecem et Name Departure Date Departure Time Airline & Flight Craig Dirksen Tues., December 3 10:25 AM Delta 1257 9131 SW Hill St Tigard, OR 97223 Home # 503-620- 4829 t+,_ -v__ -2--- A _ QU-441o .A7;ti arative fnr rity Manager Monahan at 2.15 p.m. VVCUIIVbU4 , Lctcaaav Name ca ~ - v+a....+. Departure Date . - Departure Time Airline & Fli ht Bill Monahan Wed., December 4 4:50 PM Delta 885 10248 SW Kent Ct. Tigard OR 97224 Home #503-639- 9702 Nick Wilson leaves on this day; he will get to airport on his own. Portland Airport to home addresses: Shuttle will be at the airport at 12:06 p.m. to pick up everyone (one mini van). After you pick up your baggage go to the outside information booth and let them know that the shuttle for the "Bill Monahan party" is ready to go home. Sunda V, December 8: Name Arrival Date Arrival Time Airline & Fli ht Craig Dirksen Sun., December 8 12:06 PM Delta 231 9131 SW Hill St Tigard, OR 97223 Jim & Carolyn Sun., December 8 12:06 PM Delta 231 Griffith 10915 SW Fairhaven Way Tigard, OR 97223 Bill Monahan Sun., December 8 12:06 PM Delta 231 10248 SW Kent Ct Tigard, OR 97224 Nick Wilson Sun., December 8 12:06 PM Delta 231 12573 SW Winterlake Drive Tigard, OR 97223 1: 1AMAGREERIPROJECTSWLC'02 DEPARTURES-ARRIVALS -AIRPORT TRANSPORTATION.DOC AGENDA ITEM NO.2 - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE : NOVEMBER 26, 2002 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda Items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other Issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Manager prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. It 0' NAME, ADDRESS ill PHONE TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED S-03 'PALPR- A"PZ15/1071-1 791-179-L S~~TE }~~}21~ W1 3/~r-v33 7yl~~ ~a s170- I79? 5KATE PA&1C N1; clue! C. c~~vn'tb ' a~~ (~E ;--ZAC r on (A H R l'& h ard VISITOR'S AGENDA Page 1 S° dy AGENDA ITEM # --stns" O FOR AGENDA OF l l-!6-02 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Update on urban Jervices t'L UCHICHL 1 uiicu PREPARED BY: Julia Haiduk DEPT HEAD OK ITY MGR 01 ISSUE BEFORE THE C UNCIL Receive update on the status of the Urban Service Agreement (USA) required by Senate Bill 122 (SB122). STAFF RECOMMENDATION N/A INFORMATION SUMMARY Senate Bill 122 requires counties to coordinate service provider agreements for ubanizable areas to identify who the ultimate service provider will be. A signed USA is also a requirement of proceeding with an annexation plan. Washington County has been working with a SB122 Management Oversight Committee for a few years to develop agreed upon principles so that all USA's could be similar in format and content. Because of Tigard's interest in examining the Bull mountain area, the County determined that we would be among the first cities in Washington County to develop and sign the agreement. The City of Tigard, Washington County and the specific service providers (Clean Water Services, Tri-Met, Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, and Tualatin Valley Water District) have been coordinating their comments and issues and are close to a final USA. Attached is a copy of the draft USA. This has been coordinated by various City departments including Public Works (Parks, Storm and Sanitary Sewer and Water), Police, Finance, Administration, Engineering and Community Development. It is not considered the final draft because the other service providers have not commented and Tigard has a remaining minor issue with the Water section. Once a final USA is prepared, staff will bring it to Council for approval and signature. It is anticipated that the final USA will be brought to the City Council at the December 10, 2002 Council meeting. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Not applicable VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Growth and Growth Management, Goal #2 - Urban services are provided to all citizens within Tigard's urban growth boundary and recipients of services pay their share. ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment 1: Draft Urban Service Agreement FISCAL NOTES Not applicable I:\Irpln\julia\usa\l 1-26-02 USA update ais.doc Attachment 1 THIRD DRAFT TIGARD URBAN SERVICE AGREEMENT October 25, 2002 This AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between Washington County, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, hereinafter "COUNTY," the City of Tigard, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, hereinafter "CITY," Metro, a metropolitan service district of the State of Oregon, hereinafter "METRO," and the following Special Districts of the State of Oregon, hereinafter "DISTRICT(S)," Clean Water Services; Tigard Water District; Tri-Met; Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District; Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District; and Tualatin Valley Water District RECITALS WHEREAS, ORS 195.025(1) requires METRO, through its regional coordination responsibilities, to review urban service agreements affecting land use, including planning activities of the counties, cities, special districts, state agencies; and WHEREAS, ORS 195.020(4)(e) requires cooperative agreements to specify the units of local government which shall be parties to an urban service agreement under ORS 195.065; and WHEREAS, ORS 195.065(1) requires units of local government that provide an urban service within an urban growth boundary to enter into an urban service agreement that specifies the unit of government that: will deliver the services, sets forth the functional role of each service provider, determines the future service area, and assigns responsibilities for planning and coordination of services; and WHEREAS, ORS 195.065(1) and (2) require that the COUNTY shall be responsible for: 1. Convening representatives of all cities and special districts that provide or declare an interest in providing an urban service inside an urban growth boundary within the county that has a population greater than 2,500 persons for the purpose of negotiating an urban service agreement; 2. Consulting with recognized community planning organizations within the area affected by the urban service agreement; and 3. Notifying Metro in advance of meetings to negotiate an urban service agreement to enable Metro's review; and Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 1 WHEREAS, ORS 195.075(1) requires urban service agreements to provide for the continuation of an adequate level of urban services to the entire area that each provider serves and to specify if there is a significant reduction in the territory of a special service district; and WHEREAS, ORS 195.075(1) requires that if there is a significant reduction in territory, the agreement shall specify how the remaining portion of the district is to receive services in an affordable manner; and WHEREAS, ORS 195.205 TO 195.235 grant authority to cities and districts (as defined by ORS 198.010) to annex lands within an urban growth boundary, subject to voter approval, if the city or district enacts an annexation plan adopted pursuant to ORS 195.020, 195.060 to 195.085, 195.145 to 195.235, 197.005, 197.319, 197.320, 197.335, and 223.304, and if the city or district has entered into urban service agreements with the county, cities and special districts which provide urban services within the affected area; and WHEREAS, ORS 197.175 requires cities and counties to prepare, adopt, amend, and revise their comprehensive plans in compliance with statewide planning goals, and enact land use regulations to implement their comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Statewide Planning Goals 2, 11, and 14 require cities and counties to plan, in cooperation with all affected agencies and special districts, for the urbanization of lands within an urban growth boundary, and ensure the timely, orderly, and efficient extension of public facilities and urban services. NOW, THEREFORE, the premises being in general as stated in the foregoing recitals, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES A. Parties to this AGREEMENT shall provide land use planning notice to each other in accordance with the provision of the "Cooperative Agreements," developed per ORS 195.020(4)(e). B. The parties to this AGREEMENT are designated as the appropriate provider of services to the citizens residing within their boundaries as specified in this AGREEMENT. C. The CITY is designated as the appropriate provider of services to citizens residing within its boundaries and to adjacent unincorporated areas subject to this AGREEMENT as shown on Map A, except for those services that are to be provided by another party as specified in this AGREEMENT. D. The CITY and COUNTY will be supportive of annexations to the CITY over time. The CITY shall endeavor to annex the unincorporated areas shown on Map A, in keeping with the following schedule: 1. Near to mid-term (3 to 5 years): Bull Mountain area and unincorporated lands north of the Tualatin River and south of Durham Road and 2. Far-term (10 years or later): Metzger area. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 2 E. Pursuant to ORS 195.205, the CITY and DISTRICTS reserve the right and may, subsequent to the enactment of this AGREEMENT, develop an annexation plan(s) in accordance with ORS 195.205 to 220. F. In keeping with the County 2000 Strategic Plan or its successor, the COUNTY will focus its energies on those services that provide county-wide benefit and transition out of providing municipal services that may benefit specific geographic areas or districts. The COUNTY recognizes cities and special service districts as the ultimate municipal service providers as specified in this AGREEMENT. The COUNTY also recognizes cities as the ultimate local governance provider to the urban area. G. Within twelve months of the effective date of this AGREEMENT and prior to any consolidation or transfer of duties or any single or multiple annexations totaling twenty acres, the parties shall identify any duties performed by the parties that will or may be assumed or transferred from one party to another party by annexation, consolidation or agreement. The affected parties shall identify how the duties will be transferred or assumed, including the transfer of employees and equipment. The process to transfer duties, employees and equipment shall account for the cumulative effects of annexation, consolidation and transfer by agreement. This process shall also address large scale annexations and the large scale transfer of duties by consolidation or agreement. In the event the affected parties cannot agree upon the processes to transfer duties, employees and equipment, the provisions of Section VII of this AGREEMENT shall be used to resolve the dispute. H. The COUNTY shall have the responsibility for convening representatives for the purpose of amending this AGREEMENT, pursuant to ORS 195.065(2)(a). II. AGREEMENT COORDINATION A. Existing intergovernmental agreements that are consistent with this AGREEMENT shall remain in force. This AGREEMENT shall control provisions of existing intergovernmental agreements that are inconsistent with the terms of this AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT does not preclude any party from amending an existing inter-governmental agreement or entering into a new inter-governmental agreement with one or more parties for a service addressed in this AGREEMENT, provided such an agreement is consistent with the provisions of this AGREEMENT. B. The CITY and COUNTY have entered into an intergovernmental agreement for the CITY provision of building, land development and specific road services on behalf of the COUNTY to the unincorporated lands in the Bull Mountain area. C. CITY and COUNTY shall endeavor to take all action necessary to cause their comprehensive plans to be amended to be consistent with this AGREEMENT within twelve months of execution of this AGREEMENT, but no later than sixteen months from the date of execution. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 3 III. AREA AFFECTED BY AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT applies to the Tigard Urban Service Area (TUSA) as shown on Map A and properties added to the Regional Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) that are to be annexed to the CITY in the future as described below in Section VIII. IV. URBAN SERVICE PROVIDERS A. The service provisions of this AGREEMENT, as described in Exhibits A through G, establish the providers and elements of urban services for the geographic area covered in this AGREEMENT; and B. The following urban services are addressed in this AGREEMENT: 1. Fire Protection and Emergency Services (Exhibit A); 2. Public Transit (Exhibit B); 3. Law Enforcement (Exhibit C); 4. Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (Exhibit D); 5. Roads and Streets (Exhibit E); 6. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water (Exhibit F); and 7. Water Service (Exhibit G). V. ASSIGNABILITY No assignment of any party's rights or obligations under this AGREEMENT to a different, new or consolidated or merged entity shall be effective without the prior consent of the other parties affected thereby. Any party to this AGREEMENT who proposes a formation, merger, consolidation, dissolution, or other major boundary change shall notify all other parties of the availability of the reports or studies required by Oregon State Statutes to be prepared as part of the proposal. VI. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT shall become effective upon full execution by all parties. VII. TERM OF THE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT shall continue to be in effect as long as required under state law. The COUNTY shall be responsible for convening the parties to this AGREEMENT for the review or modification of this AGREEMENT, pursuant to Section VIII. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 4 VIII. PROCESS FOR REVIEW AND MODIFICATION OF THE AGREEMENT A. Parties shall periodically review the provisions of this AGREEMENT in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the processes set forth herein and to propose any necessary or beneficial amendments to address considerations of ORS 195.070 and ORS 195.075. B. Any party may propose modifications to this agreement to address concerns or changes in circumstances. C. The body of this AGREEMENT (Recitals and Sections I through IX) may only be changed by written consent of all affected parties. Amendments to the exhibits of this AGREEMENT may be made upon written consent of the parties identified in each exhibit. D. The periodic review of this AGREEMENT and all proposed modifications to this AGREEMENT shall be coordinated by the COUNTY. All requests for the periodic review of this AGREEMENT and all proposed modifications shall be considered in a timely manner and all parties shall receive notice of any proposed amendment. Only those parties affected by an amendment shall sign the amended agreement. All amendments that include boundary changes shall comply with Chapter 3.09 of the METRO Code or its successor. E. Lands added to the Regional Urban Growth Boundary that are determined to be annexed to the CITY in the future by separate process, such an Urban Reserve Plan, shall be subject to this AGREEMENT. The appropriate service providers to new urban lands for the services addressed in this AGREEMENT shall be determined through the provisions of this Section unless those determinations are made through the development of an Urban Reserve Plan and all affected parties agree to the service determinations. This AGREEMENT shall be amended to address new urban lands and reflect the service provider determinations consistent with the provisions of this Section. IX. DISPUTE RESOLUTION If a dispute arises between or among the parties regarding breach of this AGREEMENT or interpretation of any term thereof, those parties shall first attempt to resolve the dispute by negotiation prior to any other contested case process. If negotiation fails to resolve the dispute, the parties agree to submit the matter to non-binding mediation. Only after these steps have been exhausted will the matter be submitted to arbitration. Step 1 - Negotiation. The managers or other persons designated by each of the disputing parties will negotiate on behalf of the entities they represent. The issues of the dispute shall be reduced to writing and each manager shall then meet and attempt to resolve the issue. If the dispute is resolved with this step, there shall be a written determination of such resolution signed by each manager, which shall be binding upon the parties. Step 2 - Mediation. If the dispute cannot be resolved within 30 days of initiation of Step 1, a party shall request in writing that the matter be submitted to non-binding mediation. The parties shall use good-faith efforts to agree on a mediator. If they cannot agree, the parties shall request a list of five mediators from an entity or firm providing mediation services. The parties will attempt to mutually agree on a mediator from the list provided, but if they cannot agree, each Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 5 party shall select one name and the two mediators shall jointly select a third mediator. The dispute shall be heard by the third mediator and any common costs of mediation shall be borne equally by the parties, who shall each bear their own costs and fees therefore. If the issue is resolved at this Step, then a written determination of such resolution shall be signed by each manager and shall be binding upon the parties. Step 3 - Arbitration. After exhaustion of Steps 1 and 2 above, the matter shall be settled by binding arbitration in Washington County, Oregon, in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association, the rules of the Arbitration Service of Portland, or any other rules mutually agreed to, pursuant to ORS 190.710-790. The arbitration shall be before a single arbitrator; nothing shall prevent the parties from mutually selecting an arbitrator or panel thereof who is not part of the AAA panel and agreeing upon arbitration rules and procedures. The cost of arbitration shall be shared equally. The arbitration shall be held within 60 days of selection of the arbitrator unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. The decision shall be issued within 60 days of arbitration. X. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE If any portion of this AGREEMENT is declared invalid, or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this AGREEMENT. XI. SIGNATURES OF PARTIES TO AGREEMENT In witness whereof, this AGREEMENT is executed by the authorized representatives of the COUNTY, CITY, DISTRICTS, and METRO. The parties, by their representative's signatures to this AGREEMENT, signify that each has read the AGREEMENT, understands its terms, and agrees to be bound thereby. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 6 CITY OF TIGARD By: James E. Griffith, Mayor Date Approved as to Form: By: City Attorney Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 7 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE DISTRICT a By: Chairman, Board of Directors Date Approved as to Form: By: District Counsel Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 8 TUALATIN HILLS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT By: Chairman, Board of Directors Date Approved as to Form: By: District Counsel Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 9 TRI-MET By: General Manager Date Approved as to Form: By: District Counsel Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 10 CLEAN WATER SERVICES By: Tom Brian, Chair Date Board of Directors Approved as to Form: By: District Counsel Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 11 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT By: Chairman, Board of Directors Date Approved as to Form: By: District Counsel Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 12 TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT By: Chairman, Board of Directors Date Approved as to Form: By: District Counsel Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 13 WASHINGTON COUNTY By: Tom Brian, Chair Date Board of Commissioners Approved as to Form: By: County Counsel Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 14 METRO By: Presiding Officer Date Approved as to Form: By: Legal Counsel Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 15 EXHIBIT A PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR FIRE PROTECTION AND PUBLIC EMERGENCY SERVICES TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE DISTRICT, CITY and COUNTY agree: 1. That the TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE DISTRICT (TVFR) is and shall continue to be the sole provider of fire protection services to the Tigard Urban Service Area (TUSA) shown on Map A. 2. That TVFR, CITY and COUNTY are and shall continue to provide emergency management response services to the TUSA. 3. That TVFR is and shall continue to be the sole provider of all other public emergency services to the TUSA. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 16 EXHIBIT B PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE TRI-MET, CITY, COUNTY and METRO agree: 1. That TRI-MET, pursuant to ORS Chapter 267, is currently the sole provider of public mass transit to the Tigard Urban Service Area (TUSA) shown on Map A. Future options for public mass transit services to the TUSA may include public/private partnerships to provide rail or other transit service, CITY operated transit service, and transit service by one or more public agency to all or part of the area. 2. That TRI-MET shall work with the COUNTY, CITY, and METRO to provide efficient and effective public mass transit services to the TUSA. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 17 EXHIBIT C PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT COUNTY and CITY agree: 1. That as annexations occur within the Tigard Urban Service Area shown on Map A, the CITY will assume law enforcement services and the area will be withdrawn from the Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District. The Sheriff's Office will continue to provide law enforcement services identified through the Cogan Law Enforcement Project and those services mandated by state law. Eventually, the Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District, consistent with its conditions of formation, will be eliminated when annexations on a county-wide basis reach a point where the function of the District is no longer economically feasible. 2. That over time as annexations occur within the urban unincorporated area, the primary focus of the Sheriff's office will be to provide programs that are county-wide in nature or serve the rural areas of the COUNTY. The Sheriff's office will continue to maintain needed service levels and programs to ensure the proper functioning of the justice system in the COUNTY. The Sheriff's Office will also continue to provide available aid to smaller cities (e.g., Banks and North Plains) for services specified in the COUNTY'S mutual aid agreement with those cities upon their request. The Sheriff's Office will also consider requests to provide law enforcement services to cities on a contractual basis consistent with the COUNTY's law enforcement contracting policy. That the COUNTY and CITY and other Washington County cities, through the Cogan Law Enforcement Project, shall determine the ultimate functions of the Sheriff's Office that are not mandated by state law. 4. That the COUNTY and CITY shall utilize comparable measures of staffing that accurately depict the level of service being provided to residents of all local jurisdictions in the COUNTY. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 18 EXHIBIT D PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR PARIS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE CITY, TUALATIN HILLS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT (THPRD), COUNTY, and METRO agree: I. That the CITY shall be the designated provider of park, recreation and open spaces services to the Tigard Urban Service Area (TUSA) shown on Map A. Actual provision of these services by the CITY to lands within the TUSA is dependent upon lands being annexed to the CITY. Within the Metzger Park Local Improvement District (LID), the CITY will be a joint provider of services. The CITY and THPRD, however, may also enter into inter-governmental agreements for the provision of park, recreation and open space services to residents within each other' boundaries, such as the joint use of facilities or programs. This provision does not preclude future amendments to this AGREEMENT concerning how park, recreation and open space services may be provided within the TUSA. 2. That the CITY and the COUNTY should further examine the feasibility of creating a park and recreation district for the TUSA. If the CITY and COUNTY determine that it is not practicable to reconsider the creation of such a district, or if such a new effort is unsuccessful, the CITY and COUNTY agree to examine the feasibility of THPRD annexing the portion of the TUSA that is within the Beaverton School District and being the future provider of park and recreation services to that area. The examination should recognize the potential difference in service levels which could be offered by Tl-IPRD and the CITY should the CITY agree to allow THPRD to offer service in a defined area. Additionally, the examination should consider and recommend methods (e.g., funding) to close the difference in service levels so that neither party has the responsibility to provide a higher service level than the other party. The examination should also consider the potential length of service responsibility to provide a higher service level than the other party. The examination should also consider the potential length of service agreements should the CITY allow THPRD to deliver service, required notice prior to the termination of any agreement should the CITY determine that it wishes to take over responsibility to deliver service to the area, and how any disputes arising from a service agreement would be resolved. This examination should also recognize the difference in service levels offered by THPRD and the CITY and it should provide for methods (e.g., funding) to close any difference in those service levels so that neither the residents of the CITY or THPRD are negatively impacted by a change in service provider for that area. 3. That standards for park, recreation, and open space services within the TUSA will be as described in the CITY'S park master plan. 4. That the CITY and COUNTY are supportive of the concept of a parks systems development charge as a method for the future acquisition and development of parks lands in the TUSA that are outside of the CITY. The CITY and COUNTY agree to study the feasibility of adopting such a systems development charge for lands outside of the CITY. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 19 5. That at the next update of its parks master plan, the CITY shall address all the lands within the TUSA. 6. That the Metzger Park LID shall remain as a special purpose park provider for as long as a majority of property owners within the LID wish to continue to pay annual levies for the operation and maintenance of Metzger Park. The CITY and COUNTY also agree to the continuation of the Metzger Park Advisory Board. However, the COUNTY as administrator of the LID, may consider contracting operation and maintenance services to another provider if that option proves to be more efficient and cost-effective. This option would be presented and discussed with the Park Advisory Board before the COUNTY makes a decision. 7. That continuation of the Metzger Park LID shall not impede provision of parks, and eventually recreation services, to the Metzger Park neighborhood by the CITY. Continuation of the Metzger Park LID will be considered as providing an additional level of service to the neighborhood above and beyond that provided by the CITY. That the CITY and COUNTY will coordinate with Metro to investigate funding sources for acquisition and management of parks which serve a regional function. 9. That Metro may own and be the provider of region-wide parks, recreation and open space facilities within the TUSA. Metro Greenspace and Parks facilities typically are to serve a broader population base than services provided to residents of the TUSA by the CITY. Where applicable, the CITY, COUNTY, and METRO will aspire to coordinate facility development, management and services. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 20 EXHIBIT E PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR ROADS AND STREETS CITY and COUNTY agree: 1. Existing Conditions and Agreements A. The COUNTY shall continue to retain jurisdiction over the network of arterials and collectors within the Tigard Urban Service Area (TUSA) that are specified on the COUNTY-wide roadway system in the Washington County Transportation Plan. The CITY shall accept responsibility for public streets, local streets, neighborhood routes and collectors and other streets and roads that are not part of the COUNTY-wide road system within its boundaries upon annexation if the street or road meets the agreed upon standards described in Section 2.C.(2) below. B. The COUNTY and CITY agree to continue sharing equipment and services with renewed emphasis on tracking of traded services and sharing of equipment without resorting to a billing system, and improved scheduling of services. Additionally, the COUNTY and CITY shall work to improve coordination between the jurisdictions so that the sharing of equipment and services is not dependent on specific individuals within each jurisdiction. The COUNTY and CITY shall also work to establish a more uniform accounting system to track the sharing and provision of services. C. Upon annexation to the CITY, the annexed area shall be automatically withdrawn from the Urban Road Maintenance District (URMD). D. Upon annexation to the CITY, an annexed area that is part of the Washington County Service District For Street Lighting No. 1 shall be automatically withdrawn from the District. The CITY shall assume responsibility for street lighting on the effective date of annexation of public streets and COUNTY streets and roads that will be transferred to the CITY. The COUNTY shall inform PGE when there is a change in road jurisdiction or when annexation occurs and the annexed area is no longer a part of the street lighting district. 2. Road Transfers Transfer of jurisdiction may be initiated by a request from the CITY or the COUNTY. A. Road transfers shall include the entire right-of-way (e.g., a boundary cannot be set down the middle of a road) and proceed in a logical manner that prevents the creation of segments of COUNTY roads within the CITY'S boundaries. B. Within thirty days of annexation, the CITY will initiate the process to transfer jurisdiction of COUNTY and public streets and roads within the annexed area, including local streets, Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 21 neighborhood routes, collectors and other roads that are not of county-wide significance. The transfer of roads should take no more than one year from the effective date of annexation. C. The COUNTY: (1) To facilitate the road transfer process, the COUNTY will prepare the exhibits that document the location and condition of streets to be transferred upon receipt of a transfer request from the CITY. (2) Prior to final transfer, the COUNTY: (a) Shall complete any maintenance or improvement projects that have been planned for the current fiscal year or transfer funds for same to the CITY. (b) Shall provide the CITY with any information it may have about any neighborhood or other concerns about streets or other traffic issues within the annexed area. This may be done by providing copies of COUNTY project files or other documents or through joint meetings of CITY and COUNTY staff members. (c) Shall make needed roadway improvements so that all individual roads or streets within the area to be annexed have a pavement condition index (PCI) of more than 40 and so that the average PCI of streets and roads in the annexed area is 75 or higher. As an alternative to COUNTY-made improvements, the COUNTY may pay the CITY'S costs to make the necessary improvements. (d) Shall inform the CITY of existing maintenance agreements, Local Improvement Districts established for road maintenance purposes, and of plans for maintenance of transferred roads. The COUNTY shall withdraw the affected territory from any road maintenance LIDS formed by the COUNTY. D. The CITY: (1) Agrees to accept all COUNTY roads and streets as defined by ORS 368.001(1) and all public roads within the annexed area that are not of county-wide significance or are not identified in the COUNTY'S Transportation Plan as part of the county-wide road system provided the average PCI of all COUNTY and public roads and streets that the CITY is to accept in the annexed area is 75 or higher as defined by the COUNTY'S pavement management system. If any individual COUNTY or public street or road that the CITY is to accept within the area has an average PCI of 40 or less at the time of annexation, the CITY shall assume jurisdiction of the road or street only after the COUNTY has complied with Section 2.C.(2) of this exhibit. (2) Shall, in the event the transfer of roads does not occur soon after annexation, inform the newly annexed residents of this fact and describe when and under what conditions the transfer will occur and how maintenance will be provided until the transfer is complete. E. The CITY shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance and construction of roads and streets transferred to the CITY as well as public streets annexed into the CITY. CITY road Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 22 standards shall be applicable to transferred and annexed streets. The CITY shall also be responsible for the issuance of access permits and other permits to work within the right-of-way of those streets. 3. Road Design Standards and Review Procedures and Storm Drainage The CITY and COUNTY shall agree on: A. The CITY and COUNTY urban road standards and Clean Water Service standards that will be applicable to the construction of new streets and roads and for improvements to existing streets and roads that eventually are to be transferred to the CITY, and streets and roads to be transferred from the CITY to the COUNTY; B. The development review process and development review standards for COUNTY and public streets and roads within the TUSA, including COUNTY streets and roads and public streets that will become CITY streets, and streets and roads that are or will become part of the COUNTY- wide road system; and C. Maintenance responsibility for the storm drainage on COUNTY streets and roads within the TUSA in cooperation with Clean Water Services. 4. Review of Development Applications and Plan Amendments A. The COUNTY and CITY, in conjunction with other Washington County cities and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), shall agree on a process(es) and review criteria (e.g., types and levels of analysis) to analyze and condition development applications and plan amendments for impacts to COUNTY and state roads. B. The review process(es), review criteria, and criteria to condition development and plan amendment applications shall be consistent with the Oregon Highway Plan, the Regional Transportation System Plan, COUNTY and CITY Transportation Plans and Title 6 of METRO'S Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. 5. Maintenance Cooperation A. The COUNTY and CITY, in conjunction with ODOT, shall consider developing an Urban Road Maintenance Agreement within the TUSA area for the maintenance of COUNTY, CITY, and state facilities, such as separately owned sections of arterial streets and to supplement the 1984 League of Oregon Cities Policy regarding traffic lights. A. The COUNTY and CITY, in conjunction with other Washington County cities, shall develop a set of minimum right-of-way maintenance standards and levels of activity to be used in performance of services provided under the exchange of services agreement described above in 5. a. C. The COUNTY may contract with the CITY for the maintenance of COUNTY streets and roads within the TUSA utilizing an agreed upon billing system. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 23 D. The COUNTY, CITY and ODOT, in conjunction with other Washington County cities, will study opportunities for co-locating maintenance facilities. 6. Implementation Within one year of the effective date of this AGREEMENT, the CITY and COUNTY agree to develop a schedule that describes when the provisions of this exhibit shall be implemented. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 24 EXHIBIT F PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CLEAN WATER SERVICES, (CWS), CITY and COUNTY agree: 1. As a county service district organized under ORS 451, CWS has the legal authority for the sanitary sewage and storm water (surface water) management within the CITY and the urban unincorporated area. CWS develops standards and work programs, is the permit holder, and operates the sanitary sewage treatment plants. 2. The CITY performs a portion of the local sanitary sewer and storm water management programs as defined in the operating agreement between the CITY and CWS. This agreement shall be modified on an as-needed basis by entities to the agreement. 3. At the time of this AGREEMENT, the following are specific issues that the parties have addressed as part of this process and agree to resolve through changes to current intergovernmental agreements. A. Rehabilitation of Sewer Lines with Basins Identified with High Levels of Infiltration and Inflow (I & 1). B. For lines that are cost-effective to do rehabilitation, CWS and the CITY will consider cost- sharing regardless of line size under a formula and using fund sources to be agreed on between CITY and CWS. The cost-share is to be determined through specific project intergovernmental agreements. Following the evaluation of program funding methods, CWS, in cooperation with the CITY, will determine the long-term funding for I & I and other rehabilitation projects. C. CWS, with assistance from the CITY and other Washington County cities, shall undertake periodic rate studies of monthly service charges to determine whether they are adequate to cover costs, including costs of maintenance and rehabilitation of sewer lines. The rate study shall consider sewer line deterioration and related maintenance and repair issues. 4. Master and Watershed Planning: A. Primary responsibility for master and watershed planning will remain with CWS, but the CITY will be permitted to conduct such planning as long as these plans meet CWS standards. CWS and the CITY shall use uniform standards, such as computer modeling, to conduct these studies. CWS and the CITY shall determine their respective cost-sharing responsibility for conducting these studies. B. CWS and the CITY, in conjunction with other Washington County cities using the City/District Committee established by CWS, shall develop uniform procedures for the coordination and Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 25 participation between CWS, the CITY and other cities when doing master and watershed planning. 5. Sanitary Sewer Systems Development Charges CWS and the CITY, in conjunction with other Washington County cities, shall use the results of the CWS Conveyance System Management Study, or updates, for options for collection and expenditure of SDC funds to address current disparities between where funds are collected and where needs are for projects based on an agreed upon CITY/CWS master plan. 6. Storm Water Management System Development Charges A. CWS and the CITY shall use the results of the CWS Surface Water Management Plan Update Project to address all aspects of storm water management and to provide more direction to CWS and the CITY. B. Watershed plans being prepared by CWS for storm water management shall address the major collection system as well as the open-channel system to identify projects for funding. 7. Maintenance CWS, in cooperation with the CITY and other Washington County cities, shall use the results of the CWS Conveyance System Management Study for guidance to resolve issues related to roles of the DISTRICT and the cities in order to provide more cost effective maintenance of the collection systems. Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 26 EXIIIBIT G PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR WATER SERVICE TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (TVWD), TIGARD WATER DISTRICT (TWD), CITY and COUNTY agree: 1. Supply: A. Supply generally will not impact service boundaries, given that a limited number of sources provide all the water in the study area and the number of interconnections between providers are increasing and are encouraged to continue in the future. B. Future supply and conservation issues may be addressed through the Regional Water Consortium to the extent reasonable and practicable for water providers in Washington County. Service providers in the TUSA shall continue to participate in the Consortium and use it as the forum for raising, discussing and addressing supply issues. C. The Consortium may also serve as a forum to discuss and resolve water political issues to the extent reasonable and practicable for water providers in Washington County. The Consortium is an appropriate forum to bring elected officials together and for promoting more efficient working relationships on water supply and conservation issues. D. Intergovernmental agreements shall address ownership of interconnections between CITY and Districts' sources, whether for the purpose of wholesale provision of water from one entity to the other or for emergency use, in the case of a boundary change that involves the site of the interconnection. 2. Maintenance/Distribution: A. TVWD, TWD and the CITY do not anticipate any events in the foreseeable future that would necessitate maintenance, rehabilitation or replacement beyond the financial reach of any of the water providers in the TUSA. Each provider will continue to be responsible for providing the financial revenue stream through rates and charges and to accrue adequate reserves to meet foreseeable major maintenance needs. B. TVWD, TWD, CITY, and COUNTY agree to maintain and participate in the Cooperative Public Agencies of Washington County in order to efficiently share and exchange equipment and services. C. To the extent reasonable and practicable, TVWD, TWD and the CITY shall coordinate mandated (under Oregon law) underground utility locating services to efficiently provide service within the urban service areas. D. TVWD, TWD and CITY agree to provide to one another copies of as-builts of existing and new facilities and other types of water system maps for the purposes of facilitating planning, Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 27 engineering and design of other utilities or structures that may connect, intersect or be built in proximity to CITY facilities. The CITY agrees to incorporate such mapping into its GIS mapping system of utilities and other facilities. TVWD, TWD and CITY agree to develop and maintain a common, on-going, up to date GIS mapping system showing facilities of each water provider within the TUSA. 3. Customer Service/Water Rates: A. Price of supply and bonded indebtedness will most likely have the greatest impact on rates. B. TVWD, TWD, and the CITY believe that rates are equitable within the TUSA. C. Given adequate water pressure, level and quality of service should not vary significantly among different water providers in the TUSA and does not appear to be an issue for most customers. 4. Withdrawal/Annexation/Merger: A. Notwithstanding Section I of this AGREEMENT - Roles and Responsibilities, or existing agreements between the providers, future annexations may lead to changes in service provision arrangements. Modifications to any service area boundary shall comply with METRO Code Chapter 3.09 and provisions identified under Section IV. If necessary, the Metro Boundary Appeals process shall be employed to resolve conflicts between parties as they arise. TVWD, TWD, and the CITY shall continue to work together to adjust boundaries as appropriate to improve the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of providing service. B. In the event that the entire service area of any DISTRICT is annexed in the future, that district shall be dissolved. No attempt shall be made to maintain the district by delaying annexation of a token portion of the district (e.g., the district office). C. The area of TVWD known as the Metzger service area shall remain in TVWD, except those portions agreed to by both TVWD and CITY that may be withdrawn from TVWD upon annexation to the CITY. In exchange, TVWD will support the CITY joining as a partner of the Joint Water Commission. D. Providers that propose a merger, major annexation or dissolution shall give all providers in the study area an opportunity to influence the decision as well as plan for the consequences. None of the parties waives its right to contest a major or minor boundary change by any of the other parties on the issue of the appropriate service provider for the area encompassed by the boundary change except when the party has expressly waived that right as to a described service area in an agreement executed subsequent to this agreement. wpshare\Sb122\Tigard USA\TUSA 3rd Draft Clean Copy.doc Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 28 See attached PDF isle for larger scale chap. MAr A Tigard Urban Service Area Boundary Tigard Urban Service Area Boundary City of Tigard Uh aendGroMBaot~J'%ce 2000 0 2000 4000 Feet Xrea doundQ iiiiiaa a E Third Draft Tigard Urban Service Agreement October 25, 2002 Page 29 AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF November 26, 2002 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE PREPARED BY: Julia Hajduk DEPT HEAD OK / POOPY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Review the Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Funding Program and consider adoption. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Funding Program by resolution. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Tigard City Council adopted a resolution in February 2002 which accepted the Washington Square Regional Center, Phase II Implementation Plan findings and allowed the previously approved Plan, zoning and development code standards to become effective. Since that time, the Long Range Planning Division, along with representatives from Engineering, Finance and Public Works have been developing a detailed work program covering four areas: • Financing • Parks and Open Spaces • Transportation Demand Management • Stormwater The Council received an update on the financing portion of the program in July and received an overview of the Urban Renewal fundamentals in August. Attachment 1 is a memo from Barbara Shields, Planning Manager, discussing the Washington Square Regional Center funding program in the context of the overall Washington Square Regional Center implementation strategy. The Washington Square Regional Center Funding Program focuses on 3 major steps to help fund the Washington Square Regional Center improvements: • Evaluate the existing fees - This step involves evaluating the existing fees (TiF, SDC) to determine if they adequately cover what they are intended to. It may be necessary to raise fees citywide and/or have a separate fee structure for areas within portions of the Regional Center. This step also involves working with other jurisdictions to develop uniform fees so that all elements of the Regional Center vision can be completed, not just Tigard's portion. A final element of the work program developed is to move forward with necessary steps to ensure existing funds be available and eligible for Washington Square Regional Center needs (MTIP, TIF). • Look at potential new fees - This step involves looking at opportunities for additional fees and providing recommendations for Council's consideration. Examples may be a transportation SDC in this area in addition to the existing TIF. Other possible revenue sources that could be evaluated include: street utility fees, employment taxes, parking meters, off-street parking fees, etc. This step also involves getting all jurisdictions together to discuss collecting uniform fees in this area. The Council may also wish to look at supporting new SDC fees to help pay for support services such as emergency services. • Consider urban renewal - It was assumed in the Phase II Implementation Plan financing strategy that urban renewal would be a financing tool to fill the funding gap. Council will be provided more detailed information on urban renewal districts in the near future and more information will be provided on timelines of moving an urban renewal district through the process as well. Exhibit A is the final draft of the WSRC Implementation Funding Program. The program provides detailed actions that need to occur and the lead department or agency to effectively complete each step in achieving adequate funding for the Washington Square Regional Center area. Additional steps in the implementation of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan Implementation Program are to develop strategies and programs for parks and openspaces, transportation demand management, and stormwater. These efforts are incorporated into the Long Range Planning work program. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Do not adopt the funding strategy. Recommend changes to the funding strategy for staff to bring back for adoption at a later date. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Growth and Growth Management Goal #1- Accommodate growth while protecting the character and livability of new and established areas, strategy 5 - Address planning and growth issues associated with the Regional Center. ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment 1: Memorandum from Barbara Shields, Long Range Planning Manager Attachment 2: Draft Resolution adopting the financing strategy Exhibit A: Draft Washington Square Regional Center Financing strategy FISCAL NOTES The costs of completing program elements varies but will be incorporated into department budgets as necessary. Attachment 1 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director FROM: Barbara Shields, Long Range Planning Manager DATE: November 4, 2002 SUBJECT: Washington Square Regional Center Plan Implementation Funding Program: Context and Content The objective of this memo is to A. Define the discussion context for the overall Washington Square Regional Center Plan (WSRCP) Implementation Program; B. Discuss the relationship of the Funding element to the WSRC Implementation Program. It should be emphasized that the attached Implementation Funding document is only one of the four major components of the overall WSRCP Implementation Program and will be reviewed separately. Both the content and recommendations of the Implementation Funding document were impacted by several factors related to the scale and land use pattern within the Center area. While the Funding element contains an estimate of the overall needed infrastructure cost and funding sources, the three remaining elements of the program will address the ways to modify/offset the impacts associated with the functions of the Center. A. Discussion Context: Below is a summary of key elements defining the discussion context for the (WSRCP) Implementation Program: 1. Relationship between the estimated infrastructure needs and the existing economic importance/vitality of the Center The Washington Square Regional Center Plan is one of the significant and important centers in Oregon. The current assessed value of land and buildings in the Center is approximately $ 948 million, with City's share of approximately $ 489 million. The needed improvements are estimated to be approximately $ 144 - 160 million, which constitutes approximately 15-18% of the area's total assessed value. 2. Current versus future infrastructure needs Public investments in the Center are needed to address both the current deficiencies and improvements for future growth. In fact, many of the recommended improvements are necessary to address the current needs, not just impacts caused by future growth. The recently adopted Tigard TSP identifies significant deficiencies in the current transportation system in the vicinity of the Washington Square Regional Center area. The existing stromwater improvements are generally inadequate to address the water quality in the area. The open space \\TIG333\USR\DEPTS\LRPLN\Barbara\washington square\FStrat\CCfundmemoNov.doc and greenbelt system are the important open space improvement that would ultimately define the character and recreational opportunities in the Center area. 3. Funded/unfunded versus public/private revenues Given the regional nature of the Washington Square Plan area, only a fraction of the needed improvements, proportional to their impacts, can be funded in connection with the site-specific projects. The attached Implementation Funding document contains an analysis of the expected revenues from the variety of sources. 4. Long-term vision of the WSRCP Implementation Program The overall funding strategy contains a detailed description of actions that need to be undertaken during the next 20 years to adequately fund the improvements. Given the complexity of the program, the three-step strategy was developed to provide a sense of timeline benchmarks: Step 1: Evaluation of existing fees, 1-2 years (utilize the existing funds more efficiently); Step 2: Evaluation of potential new fees, 2-3 years (explore new fees to reflect unique functions of the regional center); Step 3: Evaluation of urban renewal, 3-4 years (consider urban renewal). 5. Urban Renewal versus available funding The analysis contained in the attached Implementation Funding document indicates that the first two steps of the implementation program can provide approximately half of the estimated $160 million revenue needed to implement the Washington Square Regional Center Plan. One of the key-assumptions of the funding program is its reliance on the urban renewal funds. Based on the growth projections utilized for the Washington Square Regional Center Plan, approximately $ 92- 162 million in accumulated urban renewal revenues could be available over a 20-year period. In short, even a very aggressive implementation of the funding program outlined in the first two steps will not generate sufficient funds to satisfy the overall need for improvements within the Plan area. 6. Multi-jurisdictional nature of the WSRCP Implementation Program The funding implementation steps require careful and ongoing coordination among jurisdictions. Given the long-term nature and magnitude of the needed improvements, the effectiveness of the implementation program depends on the coordination efforts among the three affected jurisdictions. B. Relationship between the Implementation Funding document and the overall WSRCP Implementation Program: 1. Dynamics of the Implementation Program The attached Implementation Funding document is a critical element of the overall WSRCP Implementation Program. It provides a long-term funding context for the entire Center area and foundations for the remaining elements of the Implementation Program. While the Funding element contains an estimate of the overall needed infrastructure cost and funding sources, the three remaining elements of the program will address the ways to modify/offset the impacts associated with the functions of the Center area. In short, the remaining elements of the WSRCP Implementation Program will examine the ways to reduce the level of needed infrastructure (capacity demand), which, in turn, may reduce the amount of revenue needed to implement the Center. The following three major groups of improvements make up the overall infrastructure need for the plan area: • Transportation Demand Management (TDM): will address ways to reduce demand for single occupancy vehicles and needed transportation infrastructure for the existing and future traffic flow; e Stormwater: will address ways to correct the existing flooding problems and future improvements related to stormwater quality in the plan area and the impact on the existing natural resources; Greenbelt/Open Space: will ensure that the projected densities are balanced with the need for additional open space, including a system of trails and existing natural resources. TDM Open Space/Greenbelt Stormwater \\TIG33I Funding Strategy 2. Need to Proceed and Complete the overall WSRCP Implementation Program As discussed above, the three remaining elements of the Washington Square Implementation Program affect directly the existing and future demand for capacity of the needed improvements and must be developed to complement and balance the Funding element of the Program. \\TIG333\USR\DEPTS\LRPLN\Barbara\washington squareTStrat\CCfundmemoNov.doc EXHIBIT "A" WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM FUNDING STRATEGY (last updated November 6, 2002) Council adoption November 2402 Prepared by City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director Barbara Shields, Long Range Planning Manager Julia Hajduk, Project Manager Duane Roberts, Associate Planner Beth St. Amand, Assistant Planner Technical Review Team: The following department representatives provided assistance, information and comments that contributed to the development of the funding program: Bill Monahan, City Manager Craig Prosser, Finance Director Ed Wegner, Public Works Director Gus Duenas, City Engineer Dick Bewersdorff, Current Planning Manager Dan Plaza, Parks and Facilities Manager Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer Greg Berry, Utility Engineer Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 1 • e A e e ® ' The financial strategy included in the Washington Square Regional Center, Phase II Implementation Plan identified potential funding sources and called for a number of actions by the City of Tigard, and by the City of Beaverton and Washington County, aimed at financing needed transportation and infrastructure improvements within the Washington Square Regional Center (WSRC). The strategy showed that there were no "fatal flaws" in the Washington Square Regional Center Plan and that the recommendations were able to be funded using various sources described within this document. This finding allowed the City Council to move forward with the adoption of the Washington Square Regional Center, Phase II Implementation Plan and implementation of the WSRC Plan, zoning and Development Code amendments. The major recommendations of the Washington Square Regional Center Financing Strategy from the implementation phase are: Aggressively pursue transportation funding, including the Highway Trust Fund, state and local sources, and Metro's Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP). Establish priorities so that locally generated fees from existing businesses and residents and new development activity located within the Regional Center are focused on the transportation and infrastructure needs within the Regional Center. Pursue the formation of local improvement district(s) (LIDs) where existing businesses and residents will directly benefit from improvements to existing transportation and stormwater facilities, or relatively modest new improvements are needed that benefit multiple property owners. Aggressively pursue Regional, State, and National grants and funding programs for specific improvements, and pursue dedications, donations and contributions from the private sector. Seriously consider the formation of an urban renewal district for the Regional Center as a local funding source for major transportation, stormwater, resource enhancement and parks and open space improvements that benefit the entire area. The funding program described in this document takes the work done by the Task Force to the next level by outlining specific steps and tasks needed to move the recommendations and vision of potential funding to reality. The major objective of the WSRC Funding Program is to develop a detailed timeline and determine the level of needed resources to accomplish the recommendations of the WSRC Plan and Phase II Implementation Plan and to move the WSRC Plan from a vision and concept level to fruition. The secondary objectives are to: Provide a level of refinement in understanding the major components of the WSRC Plan by focusing on actions and tasks rather than visions; Develop a simplified set of implementation tools which could be used to build a context for communication with stakeholders; Provide a starting point for a multi jurisdictional model in implementing the WSRC Plan. Summary of Funding [deeds and Funding Sources Appendix A provides a complete list of project improvements recommended by the Washington Square Regional Center Plan and Task Force and approved by the Tigard City Council. Appendix A also provides the estimated costs and potential funding sources identified for each improvement. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 2 The identified improvements account for more than $160 million in transportation, stormwater, and parks and open space improvements needed over the next 20 years to support existing and anticipated businesses and residences in the area and to preserve its livability. A summary of the improvements and costs are: Transportation $115.7-121.7 million Stormwater/Natural Resource $15.2-18.0 million Greenway, Parks and Open Space $13.1-20.9 million Total Needed Improvements (Over 20 years) $144.0- 160.6 million The following pie chart below shows how much of total funding requirements each category costs. 20 year funding needs (in millions) Based on the analysis of potential revenue sources during the next 20 years, the Washington Square Regional Center, Phase II Implementation Plan concludes that adequate resources will be available to fund the public improvements necessary to implement the WSRC Plan. A key component of the WSRC implementation plan is the formation of an urban renewal district. The following chart shows the funding sources that have been identified as contributing to the Regional Center. The largest portion (65.1 million) represents the gap in funds that could potentially be filled with urban renewal funds, additional fees and/or some other choices. Total funding sources (in Millions) identified in the WSRC implementation plan - over 20 years Fri-Total LID-funds (10) 43.7 1.2 ® Gap (65.1) OMTIP (43.7) ❑ Gas tax (3.9) ®TIF (10.6) 2.5 E3 Stornmater service charge (6) 1 ®SDC (1.2) 13 Parks SDC (2.5) ® Metro greenspaces fund (1) ®targeted fund raising (parks) (1) Some improvements will be paid by developers, however, most of the identified funding need is for projects of a regional nature which will not be fully funded by private development. It is necessary to secure funding from the funding sources that exist today and to develop sources that are available but not yet in use by the City of Tigard. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 3 The potential sources identified and discussed within this funding program in the following sub- sections are: A. Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Plan (MTIP) Amendments. B. Local Improvement District (LID) Formation and Feasibility (streets, parks, sewer) C. Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Amendments/Allocations D. Systems Development Charge (SDC) Amendments/Allocations (stormwater, parks, other) E. Additional Local Fees/Assessments F. Urban Renewal Plan Feasibility Assessment Council Policy Decisions The major policy question this document addresses is how to narrow and close the gap between funding needs and available fundin resources. The following general strategies will be utilized and will guide the work Now 17~ Yom) programs and implementation tasks that have been identified: ) haw"w(MIM) Throughout this document, there are occasions where a policy decision by Council is needed before a firm work plan can be developed. Council will be asked at key points for direction on major policy decisions summarized below: Policy Issues to be Discussed at Key Points in Program Implementation by the Tigard City Council • Provide direction on how aggressive the City should be in pursuing the formation of an LID. Option 1: City staff should keep informed of development activity within potential LIDs and make developers aware that there is City support for forming LIDs to implement the Regional Center Plan. (passive) Option 2: City staff should identify potential LID locations and assess support for the formation of an LID in the near term. (less aggressive) Option 3: City policy regarding development in the Washington Square Regional Center should be that all local streets shall be fully improved (not just % streets as currently accepted) before development may occur. This would force either the developer to construct the street or to enter into a non-remonstrance agreement for the formation of an LID. (aggressive approach) Option 4: Require the formation of LIDs. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 4 • Evaluate the feasibility and support for a parks LID in the Regional Center. m Consider whether to bring the TIF eligible projects up on the priority list through the CIP process -(Council policy issue as to priority compared to other TIF eligible projects). • Review the issue of dedicating TIF revenues generated within the Regional Center area solely to the Regional Center and provide direction to staff as to whether those revenues should or should not be dedicated. • Review the issue of dedicating SDC revenues generated within the Regional Center area solely to the Regional Center and provide direction to staff as to whether those revenues should or should not be dedicated. • Consider the creation of additional SDCs. • Provide direction on how to balance the competing demands for MTIP project applications. • Determine if staff should explore additional fees or local assessments with regional partners. • Consider whether the City should take the lead on construction of all projects in the Regional Center so we have a consistent approach to all projects. This would require an inter- governmental agreement. • Consider if the City should actively seek partnerships with neighboring Cities/County and the business community to participate in major funding decisions. • Discuss and strategize how we get buy-in and active support from the property owners and business community. • Consider Urban Renewal. Organization of Document The purpose of this analysis is to examine the critical steps and players necessary to acquire funding for the identified improvements. In order to fully implement the Regional Center Plan, the financial recommendations must be followed in accordance with the work program and implementation chart outlined in the following sub-sections. The information in each sub-section is organized as follows: Background - Provides a general overview of the fund source, its intent and an overview of additional issues. Process - Provides information on how the funding process works, including steps that need to happen before funding can be made available. Recommendations - Makes specific recommendations to obtain the funding utilizing the process outlined in the previous section. Work Program Description - Lists specific steps from near term to long term to obtain funding and get identified improvements completed. Implementation Chart - Identifies key implementing departments and agencies for each task in the work program. Also identifies the lead department or agency and the decision maker if applicable. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 5 The Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) allocates federal funds in the region and is updated every two years, and includes a rolling, four-year program of transportation improvements. In order to be eligible for MTIP funding, a project must be identified in the "financially constrained transportation system". The financially constrained transportation system is based on federal planning requirements and is based on a financial forecast of limited funding over the 20-year plan period. It is anticipated that funding will be available for projects identified in the financially constrained system. The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which was adopted in 2000, identifies projects of regional significance that are in the financially constrained system or the priority system. Every project identified in the financially constrained system is also included in the priority system. Projects that are in the priority system alone are not eligible for MTIP funding. The priority system projects are intended to guide local transportation plans and land use actions, and serve as the source of future projects in the financially constrained system, either through amendments to the RTP, or through the regular updates that occur every three to five years." The following lists the projects in the Regional Center and in which system they are currently identified: Task Force Recommended Auto- Related Improvements' RTP Designation Highway 217 improvements Financially constrained North Mall to Nimbus connection Priority system South Mall to Nimbus connection Not specifically identified SW Nimbus-Greenbur connection Priority system SW Lincoln Street from Locust to Oak Priority system SW Locust from Hall to Greenbur Priori system Widening of Hall Boulevard Financially constrained/priority system Non-Auto related improvements RTP Designation Washington Square Mall pedestrian improvements Priority system Transit Center improvements Priority system Hall Blvd. pedestrian improvements Financially constrained Greenbelt trail connections - tying into Fanno Creek Trail Not identified in the RTP TMA start-up Financially constrained - re er o appen ix or escrip ion o improvement, es ima a cos an a i iona po en is sources o un ing As the table above shows, the majority of the recommended improvements are not currently eligible for MTIP funds because they are not included in the financially constrained system. The City of Tigard has determined that the following auto related improvements are of regional significance and, as such, should be fully or partially funded through MTIP funds: • North Mall to Nimbus connection (Beaverton) • South Mall to Nimbus connections (Tigard) • SW Nimbus-Greenburg connection (Tigard) • SW Locust from Greenburg to Hall (Tigard) • Regional greenbelt trail system connections (Tigard, Washington County and Beaverton) Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 6 In order to fund these projects with MTIP funds, the RTP must be amended to include these projects in the financially constrained system. PROCESS The RTP financially constrained analysis must create a balanced system that does not bring the region into non-compliance with federal air quality issues. To amend the RTP to include a project in the financially constrained analysis prior to the 2006-07 MTIP funding cycle, the City of Tigard would have to provide an analysis which shows that the increased auto related project would not push the region over its air quality requirements. This analysis would be conducted at the City's expense. The City could then ask for a formal amendment to the RTP. Alternatively, the City could ask that these amendments be made as part of the 2004 RTP update. The 2004 RTP update is anticipated to begin late next Fall. In addition to addressing federal air quality requirements, the financial aspect is also critical. In order for projects to be added to the financially constrained system, other projects must be removed or funding forecasts increased. Once the improvements are included in the financially constrained system and eligible for MTIP funds, Tigard could apply for MTIP funds. Planning for the 2006-2007 MTIP funding cycle is currently underway, with MTIP applications due in December 2002. A summary of the decision making process for MTIP allocations is provided below. This process is subject to change and this document will be reviewed periodically to verify consistency with the current process. Council adopts resolution supporting projects to be applied for Project listed as financially constrained in RTP and eligible for MTIP funds City submits list of MTIP projects to WCCC for coordination and support Metro staff evaluates projects based on approval criteria and prepares project 10 recommendations TPAC review and JPAC approval recommendation Metro Council MTIP funds approval allocated There are several potential MTIP funded projects in the City of Tigard. Because MTIP funding is limited and competitive, the City Council should specify which projects are their priority projects in the event that all projects applied for are not able to be funded. This will require tough decisions, as any MTIP project is generally going to be of great public benefit both locally and regionally. Staff will forward recommendations to Council based on knowledge of the criteria and potential of a project to get funded when evaluated competitively with other regional projects. Washington Square Regional Center implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 7 FT RECOMMENDATIONS Monitor and comment as needed on the MTIP process revision proposals by participating in meetings with Metro staff. Begin discussions on prioritization of potential Citywide MTIP projects. (Council Policy Decision) Actively participate in 2006-2007 MTIP allocation discussions with Metro decision makers. Work with Metro to have the projects identified above (in section I. Background) added or altered in the 2004 RTP update. Work with WCCC to communicate the need to have identified projects included in the RTP update, the financially constrained system and included in the MTIP funding allocations. 14. WORK PROGRAM Status Near Term (Now) Talk to Washington County to get support for identified projects Consider RTP amendment process Write letter to Metro requesting amendments for the next RTP update Complete necessary amendment to the RTP during 2004 update Continue to support Highway 217 corridor project Short Term (0-10years) • Monitor and comment as needed on the MTIP process revision proposals and update this strategy document as needed • Actively participate in MTIP allocation discussions Work with Metro to have the projects identified above added or altered in the 2004 - - RTP update • Work with WCCC to communicate the need to have identified projects included in the RTP update, the financially constrained system and included in the MTIP funding allocations • Highway 217 corridor study - staff support Medium Term (5-15years) Highway 217 improvements - staff support regional planning efforts North Mall to Nimbus connection South Mall to Nimbus connection Long Term (11-20 years) Apply for MTIP funding for identified improvements Continue active role in the MTIP allocation cycles Continue active role in RTP updates to insure identified projects continue to be a regional priority • SW Nimbus to Greenburg Road connection Evaluate need to widen Hall Boulevard to 5 lanes Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 8 MTIIP IMPLEMENTATION CHART Tasks/implementers Near Term (Now) Work with Washington County to get support for identified projects Write letter to Metro requesting amendments for RTP update Complete RTP amendment during I 2004 update Short Term (1-10yrs.) Monitor, comment on MTIP process revision proposals Actively participate in 2006-2007 and future MTIP allocation discussions Advocate for recommended WSRC changes to 2004 RTP update Work with WCCC to communicate the need to have identified projects included in RTP update, the financially constrained system and included in MTIP funding allocations Medium Term (5-15yrs.) Monitor, comment on MTIP process revision proposals Actively participate in 2008-09 and future MTIP allocation discussions Long Term (11-20 yrs.) Apply for MTIP funding for identified improvements Continue active role in MTIP allocation cycles Continue active role in RTP updates ~{f O LRP CP PW Fin C O 0 'v » ® O n+ V ~da ~0 N U. v ® ® I3 071 ~ v v o o a p p ® D ~ ® ® O m = Lead Department ® = Involved agencies/departments Decision maker Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 9 1. BACKGROUND A Local Improvement District or LID is a means to improve a defined land area with City services constructed to City standards. The process includes both construction and financing and involves property owners, City staff and Council. LIDs are typically created to provide owners in a developed area an opportunity to finance the cost of public improvements that specially benefit their property. Districts may also be formed to promote economic development or to complete portions of an adopted plan in undeveloped or partially developed areas. The chief advantage of LIDs to developers within the Regional Center is that the districts could provide developers with financing for the construction of public improvements the developers are required to complete at their own expense. The LID designs and manages the project and the rates are generally better than developers would find if financing the project on their own. The remaining public improvements required for the Regional Center would be publicly funded by several methods including system development charges. Generally, developers are required to complete street improvements only along the frontage of the lot being developed. This can result in streets of poor quality because a number of disconnected projects are required to complete a single street. Local Improvement Districts can provide a means to avoid this by completing street improvements in a single project. The LID process begins with a need for a local capital improvement. The following street and storm drainage projects have been identified as potential LIDs since these improvements are expected to be provided by developers. • Locust Street- Provide a three-lane section including drainage and other utilities with parking, bike lanes, sidewalks and other streetscape improvements between Hall Boulevard and Greenberg Road. • Lincoln Street Extension- Provide a three-lane section including drainage and other utilities with parking, bike lanes and sidewalks between SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street. • Oak Street- Provide a two-lane section including drainage and other utilities with parking, bike lanes and sidewalks between SW Hall Boulevard and SW Lincoln Street. • Washington Square Mail Internal Roads - construct to public street standards including drainage and other utilities with bike lanes and sidewalks (must be dedicated to the public to be LID eligible). • Cascade Boulevard - improve to 3 lane standard with parking, bike lanes and sidewalks. While not specified in the Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Plan Financing strategy, it has been determined that some park improvements may be able to be funded through an LID as well. Specific improvements have not been identified, however a recommendation in this program is the further evaluation of this possibility. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 10 There are two ways to initiate a district: s Council may initiate on its own motion. 0 The property owners owning at least fifty percent of the property benefited by the improvements may petition the Council to initiate a district. By either method, Council may not proceed with a district if property owners owning two-thirds of the property area within the proposed district remonstrate against the improvement. Consequently, formation of a district depends upon property owner support. However, the developers that would benefit from the LIDs are not necessarily the current owners. The required support for districts is not expected until developers have purchased the lots within the proposed district. A proposed Local Improvement District requires a significant amount of effort and expense before owners are provided with an opportunity to remonstrate against the improvement. If the remonstrance prevails, this effort and expense is wasted. Consequently, one of the recommendations is that districts not be initiated until there is a showing of adequate owner support. This approach, however, can result in "patchwork" improvements within the Regional Center which could conflict with the overall vision of the area. It has been determined that Council must make a policy decision on how aggressively to pursue the formation of LIDs within the Regional Center. Council's decision will impact the subsequent work program and implementation chart. 1. Council must make a policy decision regarding how aggressive the City should be in pursuing the formation of an LID: Option 1: City staff should keep informed of development activity within potential LIDs and make developers aware that there is City support for forming LIDs to implement the Regional Center Plan. (passive) Option 2 City staff should identify potential LID locations and assess support for the formation of an LID in the near term. (proactive) Option 3: City policy regarding development in the Washington Square Regional Center should be that all local streets shall be fully improved (not just % streets as currently accepted) before development may occur. This would force either the developer to construct the street or to enter into formation of an LID. (aggressive approach) Option 4: Require the formation of LID. 2. Evaluate the feasibility and support for a parks LID in the Regional Center. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 11 WORT( PROGRAM) Status Near Term (Now) Prepare maps showing potential LIDs (all options) Get Council direction on approach to LIDs Include reference to the maps in land use preapplication checklists (option 1) Short Term(0-10 years) • Evaluate the feasibility and support for a parks LID in the regional center Monitor development activities in potential LIDs and inform developers of the availability of LIDs (all options) Develop list of property owners in potential LID areas and conduct information meetings on development potential and LID benefits (option 2) • If Option 2 resulted in significant support of an LID at this time, begin LID formation process (option 2) Y As development occurs, inform developers of street improvement requirements and inform developers of LID availability (option 3) Medium Term(5-15 years) • Continue to monitor development activities in potential LIDs and inform developers of the availability of LIDs (options 1 and 3) Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 12 LID IMPLEMENTATION CHART Tasks/Implementers Near Term (Mow) Council discuss options and make policy direction on which option to chose Prepare maps showing potential LIDs (all options) Include reference to the maps in land use preapplication checklists (all options) Short Term (1-10yrs.) Evaluate feasibility and support for a parks LID in the Regional Center Monitor development activities in potential LIDs and inform developers of the availability of LIDs (all options) Develop list of property owners in potential LID areas and conduct information meetings on development potential and LID benefits (option 2) If Option 2 resulted in significant support of an LID at this time, begin LID formation process (option 2) As development occurs, inform developers of street improvement requirements and inform developers of LID availability (option 3) Medium Term (5-15yrs.) Monitor development activities in potential LIDS and inform developers of the availability of LIDS (options 1 and 3) Long Term (11-20 yrs.) 0 .c o 6J CJ OL1' v In V LRP CP Eng PW Fin. Is 13 a n 13 ® ® p ® = Lead Department 0 = Involved agencies/departments ® = Decision maker Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 13 1. BACKGROUND The Countywide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact on the transportation system. Developing properties are required to pay based on the number of trips they are projected to generate. Proceeds from the TIF program are used to fund off-site improvements that provide additional capacity to the major transportation system including highways, arterials and collector streets. The number of trips generated is set out by the County TIF Ordinance and is generally consistent with the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The TIF rates vary depending upon land use category of the development. Currently, approximately $990,000 is in the City's TIF fund. It is estimated that an average of $765,000 will be collected each year (projected through 06-07) for use on all TIF eligible projects, depending on the rate of development. The program allows construction of improvements in lieu of payment of the fee. In general, the improvement must provide additional capacity to an eligible facility. Fifty percent of all net revenues must be reserved for designated arterials. TIF revenues may only be used for collectors if the County certifies that all necessary additional arterial capacity has been assured. Two collector streets within the Regional Center are expected to be TIF eligible facilities: s Locust Street- Provide a three-lane section with parking, bike lanes, sidewalks and other streetscape improvements between Hall Boulevard and Greenburg Road. Lincoln Street Extension- Provide a three-lane section with parking, bike lanes and sidewalks between SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street. These streets are not currently on the County TIF ordinance list. In addition, Greenburg Road is a TIF eligible street but improvements are not listed in the Washington Square Regional Center Plan project priority list. 0.PROCESS The list of TIF eligible projects is adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners. In order to have streets added to the TIF eligible list, the County would need to add them by ordinance. In order to expend TIF funds, the City submits a prioritized list of TIF eligible projects to the Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee to review for compliance with expenditure requirements and consistency with other TIF projects. Projects are constructed as part of the City's Capital Improvement Program. The priority for all TIF eligible projects within the City is determined through the City's CIP process. The CIP is ultimately approved by Council with initial recommendation by staff, input from the public and recommendation by the Planning Commission. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 14 The CIP process for this year budgets and plans for improvements for the next fiscal year and the following 4 years. The CIP is updated every year and projects are moved up, refined or removed as priority demands. The identified improvements are anticipated to be constructed in the short term (0 to 10 years); therefore the projects must be on the CIP project priority list no later than 2008. The actual timing of improvements will depend on development activity, TIF fund revenues and Citywide priority of the identified projects. There are 37 other Citywide projects on the TIF eligible list (5 arterial sections and 32 collector sections). The City Council must make a policy decision on whether the Washington Square Regional Center improvements shall receive emphasis during the CIP formulation process. The major arguments in favor of a dedication of TIF revenues generated within the Washington Square Regional Center to implementation of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan include: 1. The funding needs of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan are massive. The City will require every possible source of revenue to complete this Plan. A dedication of these revenues ensures that at least the TIF revenue will be available. 2. The dedication of this revenue source is a clear statement of the importance of the Regional Center Plan to Tigard and the entire Portland metropolitan area. 3. Property owners within the Regional Center may be more likely to support requests for additional funding to implement the Plan if they see all revenues generated from the area dedicated back to making the Plan a reality. The major arguments for not formally dedicating TIF revenues generated within the Washington Square Regional Center to the implementation of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan include: 1. TIFs, by their very nature, are charged to support Citywide systems, not specific geographic area projects. 2. A dedication of TIFs generated within the Regional Center could, in fact, tend to limit funding for projects within the Center. The need in the Center is far greater than the anticipated TIF can support; the City may decide, in fact, to devote more TIF revenue to supporting those projects in the short term than are actually generated from that area. If TIF revenues are dedicated, other areas of the City could rightfully argue that no additional TIF revenue (beyond the dedicated portion) should be used there. 3. A dedication of TIF revenues within the Regional Center would set a precedent that could ultimately lead to the balkanization of this important revenue source as other areas of the City request similar dedications. This would seriously impair the ability of the City to maintain and expand the transportation system. 4. A formal dedication accomplishes nothing beyond what can exist today. The City has already expressed support for the Regional Center through the adoption of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan. Council can make the Washington Square Regional Center a priority through adherence to that Plan and appropriations for the Plan's projects in annual budgets. In order for the County to process an amendment to the TIF ordinance, the City must submit a Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 15 letter requesting an amendment. The request is forwarded to the Washington County Coordinating Committee (WCCC) for recommendation and then, if the WCCC recommends the amendment, the request is put on the Washington County Board of Commissioners' consent agenda. The process takes approximately 3-4 months. The County has indicated that they plan on doing a comprehensive review of the TIF ordinance in the spring of 2003 and recommend that we wait to have the additional streets added to the list as part of that review. P. RECOMMENDATIONS In order to get the Washington Square projects identified above constructed with TIF funds, several steps must take place: • Get projects on Countywide TIF list. • Bring the projects up on the priority list through the CIP process - COUNCIL POLICY ISSUE. • The City Council should review the issue of dedicating TIF revenues generated within the Regional Center area and provide direction to staff as to whether those revenues should or should not be dedicated. COUNCIL POLICY ISSUE. • The prioritized list of proposed TIF projects should be kept current so that the availability of TIF revenues for improvements to the Regional Center may be readily determined. . WORK PROGRAM Status Near Term • Ensure that proposed projects have been approved for TIF funding. • Incorporate priority projects for consideration when evaluating funding of TIF projects. Short Term (1-10yrs.) • Monitor and participate in the County TIF ordinance review to ensure that the Washington Square Regional Center routes are included in the TIF list. Medium Term (5-1 S yrs.) • There are no long term work program tasks for the TIF section. L o n g T e r m (11-20 yrs.) • There are no long term work program tasks for the TIF section. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 16 4- ® 0- TIF IMPLEMENTATION CHART ,V P.W n. Lead Department E = Involved agencies/departments Decision maker Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 17 1. BACKGROUND The City charges new developments fees for improvements to water and parks systems necessary to support those developments. The City also collects development fees for Clean Water Services (sanitary and storm sewers) and Washington County Traffic Improvements. These fees, known collectively as systems development charges, or SDCs, may have two components: (1) a reimbursement fee, which represents a fair share buy-in to existing systems, and (2) an improvement fee to pay for additions or improvements to these systems to serve the new development. By law, SDC revenues may only be spent on projects within the system for which they are charged. For example, Water SDCs may only be spent on water projects, Parks SDCs may only be spent on parks projects, etc. The City, therefore, accounts for SDC revenues within different funds to ensure that these requirements are met. In addition, SDCs can only be spent for the capital needs of these systems: land acquisition, design, architecture and engineering, and construction. Projects eligible for SDC funding are identified in the City's Five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and funds for first-year projects from the CIP are appropriated in the City's annual budget. The new development envisioned by the Washington Square Regional Center Plan will generate significantly higher demand for water, parks, storm and sanitary sewers, and roads. SDCs paid by those developments will generate a stream of income which could be used to partially offset those costs, but which will not pay the full cost of these services. The following projects may be considered for SDC funding: Develop a stormwater facility upgrade and replacement program designed to improve existing stormwater facilities • Water quality projects identified in the Plan Parks and open space Master Plan Fanno Creek linear park development Ash Creek linear park development • Greenway trail connections Metzger School park improvements Whitford School park improvements Ash Creek Neighborhood Park Washington Square urban open space Highway 217 corridor trail system Special parks and facilities Streets and roads projects Water system upgrades The Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Plan recommends that the City formally dedicate all SDCs charged on new development within the Washington Square Regional Center to pay for the costs of improvements within that area. This is clearly a major policy question that needs to be addressed by the City Council. There are pros and cons to such a dedication. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 18 The major arguments in favor of a dedication of SDC revenues generated within the Washington Square Regional Center to implementation of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan include: 1. The funding needs of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan are massive. The City will require every possible source of revenue to complete this Plan. A dedication of these revenues ensures that at least the SDC revenue will be available. 2. The dedication of this revenue source is a clear statement of the importance of the Regional Center Plan to Tigard and the entire Portland metropolitan area. 3. Property owners within the Regional Center may be more likely to support requests for additional funding to implement the Plan if they see all revenues generated from the area dedicated back to making the Plan a reality. The major arguments for not formally dedicating SDC revenues generated within the Washington Square Regional Center to the implementation of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan include: 1. SDCs, by their very nature, are charged to support Citywide systems, not specific geographic area projects. 2. A dedication of SDCs generated within the Regional Center could, in fact, tend to limit funding for projects within the Center. The need in the Center is far greater than the anticipated SDCs can support; the City may decide, in fact, to devote more SDC revenue to supporting those projects in the short term than are actually generated from that area. If SDC revenues are dedicated, other areas of the City could rightfully argue that no additional SDC revenue (beyond the dedicated portion) should be used there. 3. A dedication of SDC revenues within the Regional Center would set a precedent that could ultimately lead to the balkanization of this important revenue source as other areas of the City request similar dedications. This would seriously impair the ability of the City to maintain and expand these important Citywide systems. 4. A formal dedication accomplishes nothing beyond what can exist today. The City has already expressed support for the Regional Center through the adoption of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan. Council can make the Washington Square Regional Center a priority through adherence to that Plan and appropriations for the Plan's projects in annual budgets. The City's decision not to dedicate SDC revenues generated within the Washington Square Regional Center to projects within the Center would not in any way negate the importance of SDC funding. Rather, it would underscore the importance of ensuring that SDCs are set at appropriate levels to recover allowable costs. As an alternative to dedicating Citywide SDC revenues to projects within the Washington Square Regional Center, the City could opt to create a special SDC district covering just that area. SDCs could then be developed and charged within that district. Revenue raised from this district would have to be spent within that district. This option would have the effect of dedicating revenues from development within the Regional Center to projects within the area. This option has many of the same pros and cons as does a simple dedication of SDC revenues, Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 19 but its major advantage is that it would allow the charging of different (and presumably higher) SDCs within the Center than are charged in other areas of the City. The issue of SDCs in the Regional Center is further complicated by the fact that the Regional Center extends into four different jurisdictions: Tigard, Beaverton, the Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District, and unincorporated Washington County. Each jurisdiction is responsible for setting its own SDCs. The four jurisdictions will need to work together to set comparable SDCs and will need to enter into intergovernmental agreements to ensure that each jurisdiction contributes an appropriate share of its SDC revenues to projects within the Center. 0. PROCESS State law governs SDCs (ORS 223.297 to 223.314). SDCs can only be charged for the capital requirements of a limited number of City services: water, sewer, storm water, transportation, and parks. By law, cities cannot charge SDCs for other services needed to support new development, such as schools, fire services, and police services. State law provides standards for the calculation of appropriate SDCs. Under state law, SDCs may be calculated in two pieces: a reimbursement fee and an improvement fee. The reimbursement portion of the SDC constitutes a buy-in to an existing system, reimbursing the City for existing capacity that will be used by the new development. The improvement portion of the SDC pays for new improvements necessary to serve the development. The improvement portion of SDCs is usually supported by Capital Improvement Plans and master plans which clearly identify specific future improvements. In addition to the requirements of State law, some SDCs collected by the City are actually charged by Washington County and Clean Water Services. Washington County levies the transportation SDC, known as the Traffic Impact Fee, and Clean Water Services levies the sanitary sewer and storm sewer SDCs (Connection fees). The City does not have direct control over the level of these charges. 3. RECOMMENDATIONS e The City Council should review the issue of dedicating SDC revenues generated within the Regional Center area and provide direction to staff as to whether those revenues should or should not be dedicated. The City should work proactively with Beaverton, the Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District, and Washington County to ensure that all SDCs are set at levels appropriate to recover existing and future costs of the transportation, water, sewer, and storm sewer systems. In addition, the three jurisdictions should explore changes in state law restricting the use of SDCs for capital improvements in other public systems (notably schools, fire and police) necessary to provide services to new developments. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 20 R. WORK PROGRAMI Near term (Now) • CIP -Ensure that all near term (five year) projects are clearly identified and funding sources (or lack of funding) are identified in the City's Five- Year CIP. Short term (1-10 years) • Master Plans - Review master plans for key City services/systems (i.e. transportation, water, parks, storm system, sanitary sewer system) to ensure that the plans reflect all improvements necessary to provide services to the new developments and projected growth in the City (including the Washington Square Regional Center). Develop project specific plans as needed. • Review and Update all City SDCs - Review and update all City SDCs and explore the creation of a Tigard Transportation SDC to ensure that they reflect the updated master plans and CIP. • SDC IGA - Develop a joint intergovernmental agreement between Tigard, Beaverton, Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District, and Washington County to ensure coordination of SDCs and to commit to shared SDC funding of appropriate regional Center projects. (Note: This could entail payments of SDC revenues by Beaverton, Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District, and Washington County to Tigard, with Tigard taking the lead in the construction of all Regional Center SDC- funded projects.) • Expand Use of SDCs - Review State statutes governing the application of SDCs in Oregon. Work with Beaverton, Washington County, Metro, and the League of Oregon Cities to request needed changes from the State Legislature. • Include Fanno Creek linear park development in the CIP • Include Ash Creek linear park development in the CIP • Include Metzger School park improvements in the CIP • Include Whitford School park improvements in CIP (Beaverton) • Include Ash Creek neighborhood park in GIP Medium Term (5-15 years) • Include Greenway trail connections in the CIP • Include Washington Square urban open space development in the CIP • Include Highway 217 corridor trail system in the CIP • Include any special parks and facilities identified in the parks master plan for the Washington Square area in the CIP Long term (I1-20 years) • Stormwater facility upgrade and replacement program to improve existing stormwater facilities Status Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 21 SDC IMPLEMENTATION CHART O City of Tigard Tasks/implementers LRP CP Near Term CIP Short Term I Master Plans I N Review and Update all City SDCs SDC IGA Expand Use of SDCs I Include the following in the CIP: p . Fanno Creek linear park development • Ash Creek linear park development . Metzger School park improvements • Whitford School park improvements (Beaverton) • Ash Creek neighborhood park Medium Term Include the following in the CIP: p • Greenway trail connections • Washington Square urban open space development • Highway 217 corridor trail system Any special parks and facilities identified in the parks master plan for the Washington Square area Long Term Stormwater facility upgrade and replacement program to improve existing stormwater facilities Lead Department p = involved agencies/depart ments Decision maker C O ® •C E O O> ;gC U) O O ' V 4) Z 00 w ® V 8% LL C2 ng. PW Pin. ® p p w ® ® p ® ® p p p ® p D ~ ® p p M p Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 22 1. BACKGROUND The Washington Square Regional Center Plan identifies a substantial number of improvements in the Regional Center needed to support projected development within that area. The City of Tigard is exploring existing revenue sources to help pay for these improvements, but it is clear that these sources will not meet the full need. None of the projects in the Washington Square Regional Center Plan are specifically identified to be built using revenues from "additional fees." Rather, additional fees may help expand existing revenue sources to support projects. Traditionally, cities around the county use a variety of fees and taxes to support various projects and services. A short (and non-exclusive) list includes economic improvement districts, street utility fees, tax base sharing, employment taxes, business taxes, parking meters, off-street parking fees/taxes, office rental fees, construction excise taxes, regional sales taxes, and congestion pricing. There are pros and cons to all revenue sources. Some may work in some areas, but not in Tigard; some may work in Tigard but not in other areas. Generally, however, it is advantageous to have a variety of revenue sources. This avoids over-burdening any one class of payers and protects the revenue stream from cyclical fluctuations such as changes in the economy or building activity. Tigard, in cooperation with Beaverton, Washington County and Metro, should explore various new sources of revenue to see which (if any) should be adopted to help support the needed improvements to the Washington Square Regional Center. Urban Renewal is discussed in a separate section of this report. 2. PROCESS New fees and charges may be adopted by a variety of means. Each will carry its own requirements. Some may be adopted by the City Council. Some may be referred to voters of the City or possibly just the Regional Center area. Some may only be adopted by action of the property owners and residents of the Regional Center. Research into likely sources will identify the process to adopt each possible source. 3. RECOMMENDATIONS canon Work with Beaverton, Washington County, and Metro to develop a list of "likely" sources of new revenues for further research. This "likely" list of new revenue sources may be refined and enhanced through the use of focus groups or other public involvement methods. In addition, it may be advantageous to enlist the aid of a consultant to aid in the development and public outreach efforts. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 23 F. WORK PROGRAM Near term (Now) e None Short term (I - 10years) o Determine Revenue Study Approach - Work with Beaverton and Washington County to determine how to conduct a study of possible revenue sources. Should this be a joint project by all three agencies or should Tigard take the lead and present the final results to the other two agencies? • Develop a List of Possible New Revenue Sources - Develop a list of possible revenue sources which merit further study by researching the literature, contacting other agencies, and working with stakeholders in the Regional Center. • Research Likely Revenue Sources and Develop a Report of the Options - Research likely revenue sources, including revenue-generating potential, costs of collection and administration, and economic, social, and political impacts. Based on this research, identify a list of sources recommended for consideration. • Public Review and Input - Present recommended options to the City Councils of Tigard and Beaverton and the Washington County Commission for public review and input. • Select and Adopt Final Options Medium Term (S - 15 years) • None Long term (11-20 years) • None Status Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 24 Near Term None Short :Terin Determine Revenue Study Approach ® ® ® ® i Develop a List of Possible New ® ® ® ® ® Revenue Sources ^ Research Likely Revenue Sources and I Develop a Report of the Options _ r Public Review and Input ® ® Select and Adopt Final Options 13 13 Long Term None Lead Department/agency Involved agencies/departments Decision maker Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 25 1.BAC(GROUN© Oregon law allows the use of tax increment financing within approved urban renewal areas. Tigard does not currently have any urban renewal areas. Tax increment financing produces revenues based on the growth of property values within the urban renewal area. These revenues are given directly to a Renewal Agency, and can be spent only for activities contained in the urban renewal plan, and only within the boundary of the renewal area. Transportation, parks, storm, water, and sewer improvements are common activities funded with tax increment financing. Tax increment funds can be used to pay for projects on an annual "pay as you go" basis, or can be used to support debt service on long-term borrowings. The funding needs of the Washington Square Regional Center are large and it was assumed that Urban Renewal could be implemented to contribute approximately 65 million towards the 144-160 million dollar identified need in the area. If urban renewal is not pursued or approved, alternate innovative funding sources will have to be acquired in order to complete the vision for the Washington Square Regional Center. 2. PROCESS There are several specific and necessary steps in developing a typical urban renewal district. • Establish an Urban Renewal Agency • Identify the blighted areas • Assemble final draft of Plan and Report, ensuring that all requirements of ORS 457 are contained in Plan and Report • Identify sequence and schedule for an public vote on the urban renewal plan • Meet with Count forapproval of maximum debt • Establish a date for a City Council hearing on Plan adoption • Submit draft plan to Renewal Agency. Agency should receive plan at an advertised meeting, review and respond to an comments, and ass plan on to Council forapproval • Council holds public hearing on adopting Ordinance. The adoption must by be non- emergency Ordinance • Public vote on urban renewal plan • Send "special notice" of adoption hearing to required parties. (The Plan and Ordinance must be available at this time • Ordinance becomes effective based on vote outcome and Council decision An urban renewal feasibility report must contain the following elements: A Establish goals and objectives for the renewal plan ➢ Prepare a list of project activities to be undertaken in the Plan ➢ Estimate the cost of the project activities ➢ Identify possible sources and timing of new building values in area ➢ Make a projection of tax increment revenues during the life of the plan ➢ Match project revenues and costs to establish when debt can be retired ➢ Establish the maximum indebtedness of the plan ➢ Estimate tax impacts of renewal plan on other taxing bodies ➢ Prepare final feasibility report and supporting presentation documents Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 26 Evaluate the feasibility and public support for the formation of an urban renewal district for the Regional Center as a local funding source for major transportation, stormwater, resource enhancement and parks and open space improvements that benefit the entire area. 3. RECOMMENDATIONS To be developed EWoRK PROGRAM Near term (Now) • To be developed Short term (I - 10years) 0 To be developed Medium Term (S - 15 years) • To be developed Long term (11-20 years) • To be developed URBAN RENEWAL FEES IMPLEMENTATION CHART Tasks/Implementers Near Term To be developed Short Tern To be developed Medium term To be developed Long Term To be developed Lead Department/agency 0 = Involved agencies/departments Decision maker Status City of Tigard o o - v S E t n V CD 'C1 L Im ~ I U) I LRP CP Eng PW Fin Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 27 Appendix A - Task Force Recommended Improvements Project Description F Estimated Potential funding cost $1,000 I source Transportation Improvements Highway 217 Identify and plan for the implementation of improvements to Regional/ Regional funds Improvements Highway 217 and its interchanges between Interstate 5 and ODOT Highway 26. funds North Mall to Task Force Priority 1 - Build a bridge over Highway 217 30,000 MRTP, Urban Nimbus connecting the Washington Square Mall with the Nimbus Renewal Connection Business Center. The bridge is intended to be a facility for local travel within the Regional Center. It would include a two-way roadway, bike lanes, sidewalks and facilities for transit. SW Nimbus- Task Force Priority 2 - 2 parts: 38,000 MRTP, Urban Greenburg - Modify existing roadway north of Scholls Ferry Road to a Renewal Connection 3 lane facility with parking, bike lanes and sidewalks. o Extend SW Nimbus Avenue to meet Greenburg Road. This would be a 5-lane roadway with bike lanes and sidewalks - no on-street parking. South Mall to Task Force Priority 3 - Build a new bridge from SW Locust 26,000 MRTP, Urban Nimbus /Greenburg Road, through Washington Square over Renewal Connection Highway 217 terminating at the extended SW Nimbus Avenue south of Scholls Ferry Road. SW Lincoln Task Force Priority 4 - Modify Lincoln Street to provide a 3- 3,000 TIF, LID Street from lane section with parking, bike lanes and sidewalks between Locust to Oak SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street. Widening of Hall Task Force Priority 5 - First, build a 3-lane facility with 18,000 for 3 MRTP, Urban Boulevard (3 or sidewalks and bike lanes between Oleson Road and lane, 24,000 Renewal, State 5 lanes) Highway 217. If after other project recommendations have for 5 lane been built and it is found that Hall Boulevard still needs to be a 5-lane facility, the roadway would be widened again. In the interim, and as possible, the City of Tigard or ODOT would acquire the right-of-way necessary. SW Locust Modify Locust Street between Hall Boulevard and 40-55 Urban Renewal, Street from Hall Greenburg Road to include a 3-lane section with parking, TIF .to Greenbura bike lanes, sidewalks and other streetsca a improvements. Washington Build improvements to existing Washington Square Mall Varies Require for Square Mall internal circulation roads to meet public street standards development, internal roads with bike lanes and sidewalks. LID, Urban Renewal Cascade Improve existing roadway (north and south of Scholls Ferry Varies LID, developer Avenue Road) to 3-lane standard with parking, bike lanes, and sidewalks. Oak Street Modify the roadway to provide a 2-lane section with parking, 40-55 LID, developer improvements bike lanes, and sidewalk between SW Hall Boulevard and from Hall to SW Lincoln Street. Lincoln Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 28 Project Description Estimated Potential funding cost ($1,000) source Stormwater Management Develop a storm 6 Complete a drainage analysis of area; Identify necessary 3,800-5,800 Urban Renewal, water facility improvements. total LID, SDC, Service Charge upgrade and m Construct upgrade for residential area north of Oak replacement Street program o Construct /replacement for other areas designed to G Demonstration Project improve existing storm water facilities Major new storm Water quality projects Ash Creek; Park Place to Cedarcrest 665 SWM SDC's water Rd., Hall to Metzger, Hwy 217 to Hall, confluence to Hwy improvements 217 identified as part of the Fanno Creek Watershed Master Plan Parks and Open spaces Parks and Open Master Plan for all parks, plazas and open spaces identified 250 SDC, Metro Space Master in the Washington Square Regional Center Plan and Plan Implementation Plan Fanno Creek Connections from the existing Fanno Creek greenway trail 425-700 SDC, developer linear park to the Regional Center to the east and to other parks and contributions, development trails Metro Greenspaces program Ash Creek linear Connections along Ash Creek and to the Fanno Creek trail 1,710-2,850 SDC, developer park system and Hwy 217 crossing contributions, development Metro Greenspaces pro -gram Greenway trail connections: . Fanno Creek Connection over Hwy 217 between the Fanno Creek MTIP, SDC, to Red Tail greenway to Whitford school and Red Tail Golf Course 838-1,234 developer Golf Course contributions Red Tail Golf Connections through or around the golf course 245-555 MTIP, SDC, c )urse Trail developer contributions . Oleson Road Connections between Red Tail Golf Course and Hall Blvd. 345-1,540 MTIP, SDC, to Hall Blvd developer contributions . Hall Blvd. to Sidewalk widening and improvements along Hall Blvd. to the 150-275 MTIP, SDC, Metzger Park park developer contributions Metzger School Improvements to recreation, sports and playground facilities 150 SDC, developer Improvements contributions, Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 29 Project Description Estimated Potential funding cost ($1,000) source school district Whitford School Improvements to recreation, sports and playground facilities 150 SDC, developer Improvements contributions, school district Ash Creek New neighborhood park east of Greenburg Road 755-1,585 SDC, developer Neighborhood contributions Park Washington New urban plaza near the center of the Regional Center 7,675- SDC, developer Square Urban 10,645 contributions Open sace Highway 217 Bicycle and pedestrian trail system to provide connections to 240-790 Part of Highway Corridor Trail the greenbelt, enhanced pedestrian streets, bridge 217 widening System crossings and open space facilities project, SDC, developer contributions Special Parks Possible local recreation and interpretive facilities include 175 SDC, developer and Facilities arboretum, butterfly parks, community centers, swimming contributions, pools, tennis facilities, skating parks, museums, interpretive targeted facilities and others fundraising Sources: Washington Square Regional Center Phase II Implementation Plan Summary Report and Washington Square Regional Center Funding Matrix developed by the City of Tigard internal funding strategy group. Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program/Financing Strategy Page 30 Background Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Program Funding Program November 2002 • February 2002, WSRC Plan implemented • Work programs needed for: - Financing - Parks and Openspaces - Transportation Demand Management - Stormwater • Funding Program the first to be developed • Remaining programs included in Long Range Department work program Why the Funding Program First? • The funding is the foundation for all Regional Center improvements • Need to begin working on funding strategy elements to fund: - transportation, -stormwater, and - parks and open spaces elements • Risk missed opportunities if we wait Myear funding needs (in millions) 13 1 152 iv. t K*ti.:: ; a Unfunded transportabon ■Stormwaler e3i 0 Grcenxay 1157 Funding Need • Total funding needed for the identified Regional Center improvements is $144 million. • Transportation • Stormwater • Parks and Open spaces Potential Funding Sources •(MTIP) Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Plan . Local Improvement District (LID) - streets, parks, sewer -Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) •Systems Development Charge (SDC) - stormwaler, parks, other -Additional Local Fees/Assessments • Urban Renewal How much can the existing funding sources contribute to the need? -A little more than half Council Policy Decisions • The major policy question is how to narrow and close the gap between funding needs and available funding resources. • Several strategies are recommended within the proposed Funding Program. Steps to Take to Fill the Gap s•' - a 'ta u28 ~ •~.~Y,;~~ Yas: y,a, Look at potential flew fees i" Pip" Consider Urban Renewal Total funding sources (k1 fAllbns) identified in the WSRC 4rplarrent2lbn plan - over 20 years aT. Lot— (10) 437 3a dap leS.n o MIP(~3 n 1as OOU W (3 a) a oTSpo e> 1,2 2.5 ~r 05bmv Y..wc. e.-ts) 1 ■soc it 2) + 1 on.M.5M121) pwnapc.r +vtl(1) es.1 ■ 0-M) (1..a 1...n (ca.) U) Steps to Take to Fill the Gap ~ ~ C~ Now (1,t yYaa) -~t.~k2r~~.t~..`..f~py1y..~~.g ~{~arhrmflVloer~l 4`~oas~de~~t7~an;~ena~,~at,'; G~ ~►~1~1~1 Evaluate Existing Fees • Dedicate funds generated in Regional Center or make Regional Center priority for funding but not c'edicate funds. • Initiate discussions regarding SDC's, local fees and assessments. 2 Steps to Take to Fill the Gap I Evaluate existing fees M./.tn~Cw.M~~~:- w l_ 4= Afa/kMPj1M) Consider Urban Renewal U AiW&2fM)W# Steps to Take to Fill the Gap Now(f,8yow) Evaluate existing fees Look at potential new fees KivfreP4)M# ~ ~rlom(~y~l Funding Program Document • The funding strategy has a detailed work program that will guide staff in completing the necessary steps. • Council will be asked to make policy decisions at key points throughout the implementation of the program. Look at Potential New Fees • Consider creation of additional SDC's including a traffic SDC. • Work with regional partners to develop consistent approach in the Regional Center. Consider Urban Renewal • Finance Director scheduled to come in December to provide information on Urban Renewal programs. • If Urban Renewal is pursued, the next step would be to prepare an Urban Renewal feasibility study Recommendation to Council • Adopt the proposed Washington Square Regional Center Funding Program by Resolution. AGENDA ITEM # 5 _ FOR AGENDA OF 11/26/02 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA Skate Park Facility Design Presentation PREPARED BY: Dan Plaza DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL City Council is being asked to approve the Skate Park Facility Design as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council approve the Skate Park Facility Design as presented. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Mayor's Skate Park Task Force has conducted many meetings since its inception. The Council, at their January 15, 2002 meeting gave their unanimous consensus to provide the Task Force with $20,000 in seed money to pay for a design consultant and to cover some of the initial costs of the Task Force. There have been several meetings focusing on a design for a skate park facility. At the City Council's May 14, 2002 meeting the Council approved the hiring of Purkiss Rose, RSI to prepare a skate park design and preliminary cost estimates. The consultants conducted three design meetings attended by kids and adults of all ages. The dates of those meetings were June 13, July 30 and September 18. The product of this design process is a final design and cost estimate for a skate park facility, which can be adapted to any given permanent site location. This proposed design has been approved by two of the City's insurance representatives. Issues remaining to be addressed are site selection, fundraising, and of course, construction of the skate park. The Site Selection committee continues looking for a site for the skate park facility. They have looked at various potential sites and the present focus is the Fowler School site on Tigard Street. The Finance committee continues to meet to discuss fundraising options and the Task Force Chair is presently trying to get additional members to serve on the fundraising committee. A community meeting to discuss the possibility of locating a skate park facility at the Fowler site has been set for November 20, 2002. Staff will provide an update from the meeting on the 20th at the November 26 Council meeting. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Council not approve the Skate Park Facility Design VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY ■ Urban and Public Services, Recreation #1, " providing opportunities for the Tigard community." ■ Parks and Greenways #2, Strategy, "acquire and develop park land." ATTACHMENT LIST Skatepark Master Plan Drawing (Larger, colored copy will be forwarded in the Council Newsletter packet on November 22, 2002.) FISCAL NOTES The design process, which is complete, cost $12,318. Funds for future design (prepare construction drawings/specs, etc.) and possible land acquisition are in the Parks Capital fund ($200,000). At the present time, it is anticipated that a fundraising campaign, spearheaded by the mayor's task force, will generate the funding necessary to construct the skate park facility. The estimated costs to construct the skate park facility are as follows (assuming no costs for land acquisition): Size Costs With Ancillary Costs 15,000 square foot ark $392,000 $540,000 20,000 square foot ark $519,000 $669,000 25,000 square foot ark $627,000 $777,000 Ancillary costs estimated at $150K (bathrooms, landscaping, walkways, spectator area(s) drinking fountain, security lighting, furnishings, additional parking, etc. N n m r rn i d Q 0 L/ 0 u AO I1 py~ T ~,aY P AGENDA ITEM # G _ FOR AGENDA OF 11/26/02 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE PREPARED BY: Beth St. Amand DEPT HEAD OK Y MGR OK vt/AI-` ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Since May 2002, the City has held informational meetings with Downtown business and property owners to discuss how Commuter Rail could benefit Tigard's Downtown. As a result, 12 individuals who have attended these meetings volunteered to join a Downtown Task Force to address the Commuter Rail station plan and infrastructure improvements, including pedestrian and vehicular circulation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That Council pass a resolution appointing the Downtown Task Force for an 18-month term. INFORMATION SUMMARY Washington County and TriMet-along with Tigard, Beaverton, Tualatin, Wilsonville and other regional partners- are planning a Commuter Rail train system that would carry commuters from Wilsonville to Beaverton beginning in 2005. As part of those plans, Tigard would have a Downtown station. In May 2002, the City invited all Downtown business and property owners to a Commuter Rail informational meeting with project leaders Washington County and TriMet. The meeting's purpose was to disseminate information, and then discuss how Commuter Rail could benefit Tigard's Downtown by acting as a catalyst for other improvements. To continue the discussion, the group met again in June, August and October. To recognize and support this group's work effort, Council suggested that the group be formalized as the Downtown Task Force. The Task Force will work closely with Washington County and TriMet to influence the station's development and appearance. The Task Force will also examine Downtown infrastructure improvements, including pedestrian and vehicular circulation. The timeline for this work is not anticipated to exceed 18 months. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED That Council not pass a resolution appointing the Downtown Task Force for an 18-month term. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Community Character and Quality of Life/Central Business District Goal #1, Provide opportunities to work proactively with Tigard Central Business District Association (TCBDA) businesses and property owners and citizens of Tigard to set the course for the fiiture of the central business district. Transportation and Traffic Goal #3, Alternative Modes of Transportation are Available and Use is Maximized. ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment 1: Proposed Resolution Exhibit A: Task Force Process FISCAL NOTES The Downtown Task Force will explore additional funding mechanisms for the Downtown station and related improvements. I:\LRPLN\beth\Downtown\11 26 02 DowntownTF AIS.doc CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON A tachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION TO FORM THE DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE AND APPOINT MEMBERS TO THE TASK FORCE. WHEREAS, Washington County and TriMet-along with Tigard, Beaverton, Tualatin, Wilsonville and other regional partners- are planning a Commuter Rail train system that would carry commuters from Wilsonville to Beaverton beginning in 2005; and WHEREAS, as part of those plans, Tigard would have a Downtown station; and WHEREAS, the Downtown Commuter Rail station will be located adjacent to the existing Transit Center and will front Main Street, thus bringing riders into Downtown; and WHEREAS, in May 2002, the City invited all Downtown business and property owners to a Commuter Rail informational meeting with project leaders Washington County and TriMet to discuss how Commuter Rail can act as a catalyst for other Downtown improvements; and WHEREAS, a consistent group of Downtown property and business owners and other interested parties met again in June, August and October to review the station-area plans, working closely with Washington County and TriMet to influence the Downtown station's development; and WHEREAS, one of e City Council's Goals is to plan for the Commuter Rail station; and wit P~J -t~4 v~rr.l P1an.f 4,0 Also ~ep"r(0p /onq /IArrSo P}An, Red;'(a~174,-l~u'^ A~ WHEREAS, to recognize and support this group's work effort, Council suggested that the group be formalized as the Downtown Task Force. The Downtown Task Force shall consist of up to 12 citizen fG,, members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Downtown Task Force is hereby established and its members shall consist of the following individuals: Chair: City Councilor Craig Dirksen; Members: Carolyn Barkley; Brian Bishop; Martha Bishop; Alexander Craghead; Francine Gritzbaugh; Marland Henderson; Chris Lewis; Mike Duyck (TVF&R); Mike Marr; Judy Munro; Mike Stevenson; Dr. David Torkko. SECTION 2: The Task Force will work closely with Washington County and TriMet to influence the station's development and appearance. The Task Force will also examine Downtown infrastructure improvements, including pedestrian and vehicular circulation, as outlined in Exhibit "A". u T(,,, 76r w u.ll c? 1+t /"Ja..A r o t IvA IaIt-, h llur cd^&.".( dYw!Is' 4jrv-4 n.v r~✓ O F eifo x, ~ SECTION 7:`1The timeline for this work~is not anticip ed to exceed 18 months. S J f-f S 77, RESOLUTION NO. 02 - Pagc 1 711^~ (I-^P 1=a„ A A L 1 S a r c y 1. { ~ v/~~, v t= 4-Gv i o ~ S ~ yr HJ _r ~o Li OK Ic f (i b1% 140 N* 1. Fie( rh ..Snc -1 ran 3 SECTION : This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2002. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder - City of Tigard I:\LRPLN\beth\Downtown\11 26 02 DowntownTF RES.doc V" a~ RESOLLMON NO. 02 - Page 2 Q I- z x uj L6 U) a- N Q Q V Q Q J OC 5 ME 2 0 0 W Vf O F ul W O h a w 0 m L a 0 F 0 W Q F e a► E ar N e 126 N d $ e a'° e U) jg 9 0 "v s 9 0 Z o* C ~ C N E N E o f CNi O - aE a w ~vE i e N C! C O. _A 0 E a e N O w ~ d 4 C E 0 O A ~ a ®~A E e ,0 r OC C d a E c 0 0 81 N O ® J o... CL 8 ,0 0 43 a (0.9 N O1 C dE c c o co p c v) LU