Loading...
City Council Packet - 11/27/2001OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 27, 2001 COUNCIL MEETING ILL E TELEVISED H:yeannie%doeskcpkf3 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 .Mayor's-Agenda PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 mm. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, x309 (voice) or 5033-684- 2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA - November 27, 2001 page 1 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 27, 2001 6:30 PM • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660(1 e). All discussions are confidential and' those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council 8t Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications 8T Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 7:35 PM 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) 7:40 PM 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Properties-for the Gaarde Street Improvements (Phase 2) Project - Resolution No. 01 - 71 Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion 7:45 PM 4. UPDATE ON BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY a. Staff Report: Community Development Staff b. Council Discussion COUNCIL AGENDA - November 27, 2001 page 2 8:15 PM 5. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10.28.030 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHANGING REFERENCE TO OREGON REVISED STATUES AND ELIMINATING THE TERM "HOUSE TRAILER" a. Staff Report: Police Staff b. Council Discussion C. Consideration of Ordinance No. 01- 23 Suggested script for Council consideration of an ORDINANCE: Councilor: I move for adoption of the proposed ordinance. Councilor: I second the motion. Mayor: Will the City Recorder please read the number and title of the Ordinance. City Recorder: (Reads as requested.) Mayor (after discussion): Will the City Recorder please conduct a roll-call vote of Council. City Recorder: Conducts roll call vote. Mayor: *Ordinance No. 01-23 (is approved or fails) by a (unanimous or however votes were split) vote. COUNCIL AGENDA - November 27, 2001 page 3 8:25 PM 6. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE 96-08 AND ADOPTING REVISED TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO THE LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD a. Staff Report: Finance Staff b. Council Discussion C. Consideration of Ordinance No. 01- 24 Suggested script for Council consideration of an ORDINANCE: Councilor: I move for adoption of the proposed ordinance. Councilor: I second the motion. Mayor: Will the City Recorder please read the number and title of the Ordinance. City Recorder: (Reads as requested.) Mayor (after discussion): Will the City Recorder please conduct a roll-call vote of Council. City Recorder: Conducts roll call vote. Mayor: *Ordinance No. 01-24 (is approved or fails) by a (unanimous or however votes were split) vote. 8:45 PM 7. VOTE ON THE CITY OF TIGARD'S CHOICE FOR THE WASHINGTON COUNTY OTHER CITIES ALTERNATE POSITION - METRO POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (MPAC) a. Staff Report: Administration Staff b. Council Discussion C. Council Consideration:. Motion naming the City of Tigard's choice for the position of MPAC Alternate. COUNCIL AGENDA - November 27, 2001 page 4 8:55 PM 8. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 9:05 PM 9. NON AGENDA ITEMS a. Tigard Central Business District Association Invoice for Holiday Tree Lighting Council Motion: Should Council authorize payment for Holiday Tree Lighting electrical work? 9:15 PM 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is tailed to order, the appropriate ORE citation will be announced identifying the applicable statue. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9:25 PM 11. ADJOURNMENT \\T I G333\U S R%D E PTSIAD hACAT FMC CA\011127. D OC COUNCIL AGENDA - November 27, 2001 page 5 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, begin first duly sworn, on oath, depose and 54y: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number (s) n~- -AS , b \ - 34 which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated It \ -a 1 \ I copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attachd\ and by reference made a part hereof, on the _ S- day of -1)-2 Q}~yt\ly~A , 2001 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. Tigard Library, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 3. Tigard Water Department, 8777 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon Subscribed and sworn to before me this - 'day of 20 61 OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Public for Oregon D L ISSE A ~ lYSSSION NCO.33220M My Commission Expires: ~o • x-003 mMYCOMMmssos I SSiON EXPIRES FEB. 11, 2OW CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO.01- Jj AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10.28.030 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHANGING REFERENCE TO ORS AND ELIMINATING THE TERM "HOUSE TRAILER" WHEREAS, Sub section 10.28.030 of TMC currently refers to section 10.28.010 (c) for definitions of types of vehicles restricted; and WHEREAS, the definitions further refer to ORS 801.565, and WHEREAS, subsection 10.28.030 (a) and (b) refer to "house trailer" for which there is no definition in the TMC or ORS; and WHEREAS, subsection 10.28.030 (a) and (b) should be changed to delete "house trailer" and delete the reference to subsection 10.28.010 (c) and add the wording "ORS 801.560." NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The subsection 10.28.030 (a) of TMC is changed to eliminate the term "house trailer" and the reference to 10.28. 10 (c) subsection 8; and add "ORS 801.560." PASSED: By UrlalAiMott 5 vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this ,MUIday of 1110V n'1 k e " , 2001. Greer A. Gaston, Dty City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of AID VP 1" e u ~f , 2001. T~-Ies E. G ffi or Approved as to form: Attorney t Date ORDINANCE No. 01-23 Page 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE Chapter 10.28. PARKING. 10.28.010 Definitions. 10.28.020 Repealed by Ord. 93-21. 10.28.022 Purposes for which parking is prohibited. 10.28.025 Vehicle sales on private property. 10.28.030 Truck, trailer, bus, camper, motor home, recreational vehicle, and boat restrictions. 10.28.040 Removal of parked vehicle from fire area. 10.28.050 Required precautions. 10.28.060 Parallel parking requirements. 10.28.070 Space markings. 10.28.080 S.W. Main Street between S.W. Burnham Street and Oregon Electric Railroad right-of-way. 10.28.090 Two-hour time limit. 10.28.095 Twelve Hour Limit 10.28.110 Fifteen-minute time limit. 10.28.120 Sunday restrictions. 10.28.125 Specified period restrictions. 10.28.130 Prohibited at any time. 10.28.135 Parking prohibited eight a.m. to six P.M. 10.28.136 Loading zones-Authority to establish. 10.28.137 Loading zones-Designated. 10.28.138 Construction zones and temporary loading zones. 10.28.140 Violation-Mode of charging defendant. 10.28.150 Violation-Penalty. 10.28.160 Authority to impound improperly parked vehicles. 10.28.170 Parking prohibited in specified places. 10.28.175 Residential parking zones. 10.28.180 Definitions for Sections 10.28.190 through 10.28.210. 10.28.190 Application of parking regulations to disabled persons. 10.28.200 Parking in space reserved for disabled persons prohibited-- Exceptions. 10.28.210 Removal and impoundment of vehicle unlawfully parked in space reserved for disabled persons. 10.28.010 Definitions. (a) "Parking" or "parked," for purposes of the city motor vehicle code, means the standing of a vehicle, whether occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily for the purpose of and while actually engaged in loading or unloading property or passengers, or in obedience to traffic regulations or traffic signs or signals. (b) It is unlawful for any person to park or stop any vehicle for a longer period of time than that designated by official signs, parking meters or other markings placed by or under authority of the city. "Parking time limit" includes the aggregate of time of all stopping or standing of the same vehicle on the same side of the street within a space of three hundred lineal feet measured along the curbline and between intersections; and the parking, standing or stopping of any vehicle within such expanse shall not exceed the designated time limit during any three-hour period. (c) For purposes of this chapter, the definitions of the following terms as used herein shall conform to the following ORS sections which by reference herein are made a part of this chapter: (1) "Camper" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.180. (2) "Highway" or "street" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.305. 10-28-1 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (3) "Mobile home" is defined as set forth in ORS 801.340. (4) "Motorbus" is defined as a Commercial Bus as set forth in ORS 801.200. (5) "Motor home" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.350. (6) "Motor truck" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.355. (7) "Recreational vehicle" is defined as set forth in ORS 446.003. (8) "Trailer" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.560. (9) "Travel trailer" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.565 (10) "Truck tractor" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.575. (Ord. 99-28, Ord. 93-21 §1, 1993; Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7, §1, 1970). 10.28.020 Repealed by Ord. 93-21. 10.28.022 Purposes for which parking is prohibited. prescribed by the Oregon State Motor Vehicle Code. It shall constitute prima facie evidence of storage of a vehicle if the same is not moved for a period of twenty-four (24) hours. The continuity of the time shall not be deemed broken by movement of the vehicle elsewhere on the block unless the movement removes the vehicle from the block where it was located before it is returned. Any vehicle mentioned in this subsection parked on the right-of-way of any highway, or upon any public street or public way within the city in violation of this subsection may be treated as an abandoned vehicle and the provisions of Chapter 7.60 shall apply. (Ord. 93- 21 §3, 1993) 10.28.025 Vehicle sales on private property. (a) No property owner, unless in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 5.04, Business Taxes, and in further compliance with all applicable zoning codes, shall allow more than one vehicle to be displayed for sale on his or her property. (b) Violation of this section shall be a Class I infraction and shall be subject to the provisions of the civil infractions ordinance, Chapter 1.16 of this code. (Ord. 8740 §1, 1987). No person shall park a vehicle on the right- of-way of any highway, or upon any public street or public way within the city limits for any of the following purposes: (1) Selling or offering merchandise for sale; (2) Washing, greasing or repairing such vehicle cxcept as may be necessitated by emergency; (3) Storage, for any period of more than twenty-four hours, except that this subsection shall be subject to the limits elsewhere prescribed in the city motor vehicle code or as may be 10.28.030 Truck, trailer, bus, camper, motor home, recreational vehicle, and boat restrictions. (a) No person shall at any time park or leave standing a heuse ~~motor bus, motor truck, truck tractor, motor home, boat, vehicle with camper, recreational vehicle, or trailer, as defined in Seetien 10.28.010(3-4 ORS 801.560, whether attended or unattended, on any improved public highway, public street or other public way within the city limits, for a period greater than thirty (30) minutes, between the hours of one minute past twelve a.m. and six a.m. 10-28-2 Code Update: 01/00 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (b) A recreational vehicle, hetise ailer, or motor home may be parked on a public street longer than the period allowed in Section 10.28.030(a) if: (1) It is owned by the resident or guest of the resident of the property in front of which it is parked, (2) It is parked on the public street adjacent to the lot of the resident, and (3) It is parked on the public street no longer than ten (10) days in any calendar year. (c) Such vehicle must be parked in a manner which does not interfere with traffic or create a hazard by obstructing the view of drivers. (d) Tractor Trailer, Truck Trailer. No person shall at any time park a tractor trailer or truck trailer as described in Section 10.28.010(c) unattended on any improved public highway, public street or other public way within the city limits. (Ord. 93-21 §4, 1993; Ord. 81-86 §1, 1981; Ord. 81-84 §1, 1981: Ord. 79-109 §1, 1979; Ord. 76-57 §1, 1976; Ord. 76-30 §1, 1976: Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 §3,1970). 10.28.040 Removal of parked vehicle from fire area. Whenever the owner or driver of a vehicle discovers that such vehicle is parked immediately in front of or close to a building to which the fire department has been summoned, he shall immediately remove such vehicle from the area unless otherwise directed by police or fire officers. (Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 §4,1970). 10.28.050 Required precautions. No person having control or charge of a motor vehicle shall allow it to stand on any street unattended without first fully setting its parking brakes, stopping its motor and removing the ignition key and, when standing upon any precipitous grade, the front wheels of the vehicle shall be angled into the curb. (Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 §5, 1970). 10.28.060 Parallel parking requirements. No person shall stand or park a vehicle in a street other than parallel with the edge of the roadway, headed in the direction of lawful traffic movement, and with the curbside wheels of the vehicle within eighteen inches of the edge of the curb, except where the street is marked or signed for angle parking. (Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 §6, 1970). 10.28.070 Space markings. Where parking space markings are placed on a street, no person shall stand or park a vehicle other than at the indicated direction and within a single marked space. (Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 §7, 1970). 10.28.080 S.W. Main Street between S.W. Burnham Street and Oregon Electric Railroad right-of-way. All parking of motor vehicles on that portion of S.W. Main Street between the intersection thereof with S.W. Burnham Street and the Oregon Electric Railroad right-of-way shall be parallel with the centerline of S.W. Main Street, and all diagonal or head-in parking is prohibited. (Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 §8, 1970). 10.28.090 Two-hour time limit. No person shall park or leave standing a vehicle of any kind or character, whether motorized or not, continuously in excess of two hours, except on Sundays and holidays, on the following public streets and highways, or portions thereof, during the hours herein specifically designated: 10-28-3 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (1) BE'T'WEEN EIGHT A.M. AND FIVE P.M.. (A) In that portion of the southwest half of the rightof-way of S.W. Tigard Street extending from the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway (99W Overpass) to the northwest right-of-way line of S.W. Main Street; (B) In that portion of the southwest half of S.W. Commercial Street extending from a point which lies forty-five feet southeasterly of the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Main Street to a point one hundred thirty-nine feet southeasterly therefrom; and P.M.. (A) S.W. Main Street; (B) S.W. Pine Street from S.W. Main Street to S.W. Pacific Highway (99-W) right-of- way; (C) The northerly half of S.W. Center Street extending northeasterly from the intersection thereof with Greenburg Road to the intersection of S.W. 87th Avenue; (D) The east side of S.W. 87th Avenue between Pacific Highway and Center Street, except any area designated as a loading zone. (C) In that portion of the southwest half of S.W. Commercial Street extending from a point which lies five hundred thirty five feet southeasterly of the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Main Street to a point two hundred fifteen feet southeasterly therefrom; (D) In that portion of the northeast half of S.W. Commercial Street extending from a point which lies ninety-five feet southeasterly of the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Main Street to a point two hundred fifty-three feet southeasterly therefrom; (E) In that portion of the northeast half of S.W. Commercial Street extending from a point which lies four hundred forty-eight feet southeasterly of the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Main Street to a point two hundred fifty- seven feet southeasterly therefrom; (F) In that portion of S.W. Walnut Place extending from a point which lies one hundred sixty-five feet southeasterly of the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway to a point one hundred twenty feet southeasterly therefrom. (2) BETWEEN NINE A.M. AND SIX (E) Along the northeast side of SW Burnham Street between Main Street and a point 100 feet from the southeast curb line of Main Street. (3) ANYTIME: (A) Within the southwest half of S.W. Walnut Place beginning at a point which lies one hundred seventy-five feet along the curbline from S.W. Pacific Highway, thence extending southeasterly ninety feet therefrom. (Ord. 99-13; Ord. 95-31; Ord. 92-27 §2, 1992; Ord. 87-05 §1, 1987; Ord. 86-45 §1, 1986; Ord. 84-03 §1, 1984; Ord. 82-75 §1, 1982; Ord. 81-87 §1, 1981; Ord. 80-65 §3(part), 1980; Ord. 79-108 §1, 1979; Ord. 79-10 §1, 1979; Ord. 77-36 §1, 1977; Ord. 77-5 §1, 1977; Ord. 76-53 §1, 1976; Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 §9, 1970). 10.28.095 Twelve ]flour Limit No person shall park or leave standing a vehicle of any kind or character, whether motorized or not, continuously in excess of twelve hours, except when a portion of that twelve-hour period occurs on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, on the following public streets and highways: 10-28-4 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (1) On SW 76th Avenue between Bonita §13, 1970). Road and a point 500 feet south of the centerline of Bonita Road. (Ord. 94-15). 10.28.125 Specified period restrictions. 10.28.110 Fifteen-minute time limit. (1) No person shall park or leave standing a vehicle of any kind or character, whether motorized or not, and whether attended or unattended, for a period of longer than fifteen minutes between the hours of nine a.m. and six p.m., except Sundays and holidays, in any area designated as a fifteen-minute parking zone. (2) The City Engineer shall establish fifteen-minute parking zones to include no more than twenty parking spaces on SW Main Street. In selecting the locations for the fifteen-minute parking zones, the City Engineer shall consult with the owners of businesses along Main Street. The fifteen-minute time limit shall become effective upon installation of appropriate signing designating the parking spaces where the time limit applies. (Ord. 95-30; Ord. 86-59 §1, 1986; Ord. 71-33 §1 1971: Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 §§10 12, 12A, 1970). 10.28.120 Sunday restrictions. No person shall park a motor vehicle of any kind or character between the hours of six a.m. and twelve noon, on Sundays, according to Pacific Standard Time or Pacific Daylight Time as may be then in effect, on the following defined portions of public streets in the city: (1) The westerly side of S.W. Grant Street extending from the intersection thereof with S.W. Johnson Street to the intersection thereof with S.W. Walnut Avenue; (2) The southerly side of S.W. McKenzie Street extending from the intersection thereof with S.W. Grant Street to the intersection thereof with S.W. Pacific Highway (99-W). (Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 No person shall park a motor vehicle of any kind or character between the hours specified on the following defined portions of public streets in the citf: (1) Between the hours of eight a.m. and six p.m. within the right-of-way of S.W. Villa Ridge Road extending from the point of intersection of the centerline of S.W. 72nd Avenue with the centerline of S.W. Villa Ridge Road northeasterly to the junction thereof with S.W. Pacific Highway (99-W); (2) Between the hours of eight a.m. and five p.m. within the northwesterly half of the right-of- way of S.W. Grant Avenue from the intersection thereof with S.W. Walnut Street, southwesterly, to the end of the roadway at Charles F. Tigard School grounds; (3) Between the hours of seven a.m. and six p.m. within the right-of-way of S.W. Garrett Street from the intersection thereof with S.W. Pacific Highway southeasterly four hundred feet, excepting therefrom the southwesterly two hundred fifty feet; (4) Between the hours of seven a.m. and six p.m., except Saturday and Sunday, within the right-of-way of S.W. Garrett Street between Cresmer Drive and a point four hundred feet southeasterly from Pacific Highway, except along the southwest side of Garrett Street within two hundred forty feet of Cresmer Drive. (5) Between the hours of eight p.m. and six a.m:, no person shall at any time park or leave standing a vehicle of any kind or character, whether motorized or not, and whether attended or unattended, within any portion of the right-of-way of SW Milton Court beginning at the north right- 10-28-5 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE of-way line of Bonita Road and extending northerly the full length of the street up to and including the cul-de-sac at the end of the street. (Ord. 98-23; 90-12 §1, 1990; Ord. 84-68 §1, 1984; Ord. 83-18 § 1, 1983; Ord. 74-44 §2, 1974). 10.28.130 Prohibited at any time. No person shall at any time park or leave standing a vehicle of any kind or character, whether motorized or not, and whether attended or unattended, within the following defined portions of public streets and highways within the city: (1) Within the improved portion of the right-of-way as bounded by the curb lines, on each side of S.W. Pacific Highway (99-W), extending from the intersection of the centerline of S.W. Bull Mountain Road and the same extended to the southeasterly right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway, northeasterly to the northeasterly city limits, being an extension of the easterly line of that tract of land deeded to Max R. Reed and recorded in Book 611, page 286, Deed Records, Washington County, Oregon; except that there is authorized and designated as a limited parking area, two parking spaces along the northwesterly curb parallel to the southwesterly lanes of travel, for vehicular parking purposes limited to any continuous period of not to exceed fifteen minutes, extending from a point southwest along the curbline twenty feet from a point opposite the most easterly corner of the Charles F. Tigard Schoolhouse site, southwesterly forty feet, the boundaries of said spaces being delineated by painted markings; Railroad tracks (Southern Pacific) southeasterly to the intersection thereof with the center of Fanno Creek; (3) Within the east half of the right-of-way of S.W. Hall Boulevard, within four hundred thirty-five feet northerly of the intersection of the east right-of-way line of S.W. Hall Boulevard with the north right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway (99-W); (4) Repealed by Ord. 80-65. (5) Within the west half of the right-of-way of S.W. Hall Boulevard, within seven hundred twenty-four feet northerly of the intersection of the west right-of-way line of S.W. Hall Boulevard with the north right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway (99-W); (6) Within the southeast half of S.W. Main Street, extending northeasterly thirty-six feet from the intersection of the curbline thereof with the curbline of S.W. Burnham Street; (7) Within that portion of the northeasterly half of S.W. Burnham Street lying within fifteen feet of the intersection of the northeasterly line of S.W. Burnham Street with the southeasterly line of S.W. Main Street; (8) Within the right-of-way of S.W. Commercial Street extending from the westerly right-of-way of S.W. Hall Boulevard on the north side northwesterly one hundred feet, and on the south side northwesterly one hundred seventy feet; (2) Within the following described portions of the right-of-way of S.W. Hall Boulevard: (A) Repealed by Ord. 80-65. (B) Within that portion of the right-of- way of S.W. Hall Boulevard, extending from the intersection thereof with the Oregon Electric (9) Within the easterly half of the right-of- way of S.W. Electric Street, within one hundred feet northerly of the intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of S.W. Electric Street with the northerly right-of-way line of S.W. Main Street; (10) Within the north half of the right-of-way 10-28-6 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE of S.W. Pinebrook Street, within one hundred eleven feet westerly of the intersection of the west right-of-way line of S.W. Hall Boulevard with the north right-of-way line of S.W. Pinebrook Street; Frewing beginning at a point five hundred feet southeasterly of Pacific Highway and extending thence southeasterly a distance of two hundred feet; (11) Within the southeasterly half of S.W. Main Street from the intersection thereof with the northeasterly line of S.W. Scoffins Street, northeasterly to the intersection thereof with S.W. Pacific Highway right-of-way; (12) Within the northwesterly half of that portion of S.W. Main Street from its intersection on the west and thereof with S.W. Pacific Highway, northeasterly two hundred thirty feet; (13) Within the right-of-way of S.W. Walnut Street, extending from the intersection thereof with S.W. Pacific Highway (99-W) northwesterly approximately one thousand nine hundred twenty- two and forty-four hundredths feet to the city limits as the same exist on September 28, 1971; except that there is authorized and designated as an unrestricted (time) vehicular parking area, along the southwest curb of S.W. Walnut Street, two spaces, parallel with but not within the southeasterly lanes of travel, commencing at a point which lies one hundred ninety-two feet southeasterly of the southeast right-of-way line of forty-foot wide S.W. Grant Avenue and extending, thence southeasterly forty-two feet to a terminus point; the boundaries of said spaces being delineated by painted markings; (14) Within the curblines on each side of S.W. Sandberg Street, including the cul-de-sac; (15) On the southeasterly one-half of S.W. Villa Ridge Road within that portion thereof lying southwesterly of and within one hundred fifty feet of the intersection of the southeasterly right-of- way line of S.W. Villa Ridge Road with the centerline of S.W. 72nd Avenue; (16) On the southwesterly one-half of S.W (17) On the southeasterly one-half of Grant Street beginning at the right-of-way line of Walnut Street and extending thence southwesterly to the end of the street at the Charles F. Tigard elementary school grounds; (18) On the south one-half of Scott Court beginning at the right-of-way line of S.W. 98th Avenue and extending thence westerly two hundred eighty-three feet; (19) On the northeast one-half of S.W. Commercial Street beginning at the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Main Street and extending thence southeast ninety-five feet; (20) On S.W. Hunziker Street extending from the intersection thereof with S.W. Hall Boulevard southeasterly approximately two thousand eight hundred fifty-three feet; (21) On all that portion of S.W. 69th Avenue lying southerly of S.W. Pacific Highway; (22) On the northerly one-half of S.W. Walnut Street beginning at the westerly edge of the driveway entrance to Fowler Junior High School and extending westerly to a point four hundred and ninety feet from said driveway; (23) Within the southwest half of the right- of-way of S.W. Commercial Street, within forty- five feet southeasterly of the southeast right-of- way line of S.W. Main Street; (24) Within the curblines on each side of S.W. Lomita Street, beginning at a point in the centerline thereof, which point lies two hundred feet east of the east right-of-way line of S.W. 90th Avenue, and running thence easterly and northerly 10-28-7 Code Update: 01/00 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE a distance of one hundred sixty feet therealong; (25) Within the southeasterly half of S.W. Grant Avenue, beginning at the northeast right-of- way line of S.W. Walnut Street and extending northeasterly to the southwest right-of-way line of S.W. Tigard Street; (26) Within the right-of-way of S.W. Summerfield Drive, extending from the intersection thereof with the north right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road to the intersection thereof with the west right-of-way line of S.W. Alderbrook Drive; (32) Along both sides of S.W. 121st Avenue between Scholls Ferry Road and Burlheights Drive; (33) Within the right-of-way of S.W. Summerfield Drive, extending from the intersection thereof with the north right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road to the intersection thereof with the west right-of-way line of S.W. 98th Avenue; except that there is authorized and designated an unrestricted (time) vehicular parking area commencing at the west right-of-way line of S.W. Century Oak Drive running westerly a distance of three hundred feet along the south curb of S.W. Summerfield Drive; (27) Within the right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway, extending from the intersection thereof with the south right-of-way line of S.W. Irving Street to the intersection thereof with the west right-of-way line of S.W. 66th Avenue; (28) Within the northwesterly half of the right-of-way of S.W. Main Street, within four hundred ninety-seven feet southwest of the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway; (29) Within the southeasterly half of the right-of-way of S.W. Boones Ferry Road, beginning at the intersection of the west right-of= way line of Interstate No. 5 with the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Boones Ferry Road and extending southwesterly a distance of two hundred seventy feet therefrom; (30) Within the right-of-way of S.W. Scoffins Street, extending from the intersection thereof with S.W. Main Street, southeasterly to S.W. Hall Boulevard; (31) Within the right-of-way of S.W. Summerfield Drive, from the intersection thereof with S.W. Durham Road, northerly and easterly to S.W. 98th Avenue; (34) In the southeasterly one-half of S.W. Main Street, extending southwesterly one hundred fifteen feet from the intersection of the southwest right-of-way line of S.W. Scoffins Street with the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Main Street; (35) Along both sides of SW 72nd Avenue between the Beaverton-Tigard Highway (State Highway 217) and the south city limits; (36) Within the southwesterly half of the right-of-way of S.W. Tigard Street, commencing at the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Grant Avenue and extending southeasterly to the southeast right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway (99-W Overpass); (37) Within the right-of-way of S.W. 112th Avenue, extending southerly from S.W. Gaarde Street to the frontage road along S.W. Pacific Highway; (38) Within the right-of-way of S.W. Burnham Street, from S.W. Main Street to S.W. Hall Boulevard; excepting that portion within the northeasterly half of S.W. Burnham Street beginning at a point fifteen feet southeasterly of the intersection of the northeasterly line of S.W. Burnham Street with the southeasterly line of 10-28-8 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE S.W. Main Street and extending therefrom southeasterly forty-five feet, said portion of S.W. Burnham Street being designated as a loading zone between the hours of eight a.m. to twelve noon, Sundays and holidays excluded; (47) Within the right-of-way of S.W. Hall Boulevard extending from the intersection thereof with S.W. Pacific Highway (99-W) southerly to a point which lies two hundred feet south of the centerline of S.W. Scoffins Street; (39) Upon or within any delineated bicycle and/or pedestrian path(s) or lanes; (40) Within the paved portions of SW 72nd Avenue between Pacific Highway and the Beaverton-Tigad Highway (State Highway 217); (41) Along both sides of S.W. Greenburg Road between Pacific Highway and Shady Lane; (42) Within the right-of--way of S.W. 110th Avenue, beginning at a point one hundred six feet northerly of the north right-of-way line of S.W. Gaarde Street and extending thence two hundred seventy feet northerly; (43) On southwest Gaarde Street from Pacific Highway to 112th Avenue, except for that portion of the north half of Gaarde Street beginning at a point eighty feet east of the east curbline of 110th Avenue and extending to a point one hundred ninety feet east of the east curbline of 110th Avenue, measured along the north curbline of Gaarde Street; (44) Within the northeasterly half of the right-of-way of S.W. Canterbury Lane, extending from the intersection thereof with S.W. Pacific Highway, southeasterly a distance of seventy-five feet therefrom; (45) Within the right-of-way of S.W. Fir Street, extending from the intersection thereof with S.W. 72nd Avenue, easterly to S.W. Fir Loop; (46) Within the right-of-way of S.W. Fir Loop, being all that portion thereof lying easterly of S.W. Fir Street; (48) Within the right-of-way of S.W. 70th Avenue, extending from the intersection thereof with S.W. Hampton Street, southerly to the terminus thereof; (49) Within the northerly half of S.W. Walnut Place; also, within the southwest half of S.W. Walnut Place beginning at S.W. Pacific and, thence, extending a distance of one hundred seventy-five feet southeasterly along the curbline; (50) Within a portion of the right-of-way of S.W. Hampton Street being all that portion thereof lying between S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. 66th Avenue; (51) Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; (52) Repealed by Ordinance 98-09; (53) Within the southeast half of the most southerly end of S.W. Main Street, beginning at the intersection of the southeast curblines of S.W. Pacific Highway and S.W. Main Street and extending seventy-five feet along the Main Street curbline to a point; also, therein, beginning at a point on the Main Street curbline which lies two hundred five feet from said intersecting curblines and extending thirty feet therealong to a point; (54) Within the westerly half of the right-of- way of 115th Avenue extending from the intersection with S.W. Gaarde Street northerly to the intersection of S.W. Former Street; (55) Within the northwesterly right-of-way of S.W. McKenzie Street from a point twenty feet southeasterly from the intersection of the centerlines at S.W. McKenzie St., and S.W. Grant 10-28-9 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE St., to a point ninety feet southeasterly of the centerline intersection; (56) On the northwesterly half of S.W. Ash Avenue beginning at the northeast right-of-way line of S.W. Commercial Street and extending thence northeasterly one hundred thirty-eight feet. (57) Within the curblines on each side of S.W. Genesis Loop, extending from the most southerly intersection thereof with S.W. 115th Avenue easterly a distance of one hundred sixty- five feet; (65) Along the north side of S.W. Burnham Street from Hall Boulevard to a point six hundred seventy-five feet west of the west curbline of Hall boulevard, measured along the north curbline of Burnham Street; (66) On S.W. 69th Avenue from Pacific Highway to a point one hundred fifty feet north of the north curbline of Pacific Highway, measured along the east curbline of 69th Avenue; (67) Along the south side of S.W. Locust Street between Greenburg Road and 93rd Avenue; (58) Along both sides of S.W. Durham Road between Hall Boulevard and Pacific Highway; (59) Repealed by Ord. 95-32; (60) Within the west half of the right-of-way of S.W. 92nd Avenue, beginning at the intersection thereof with. the south right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road; thence, extending southerly one thousand four hundred fifty feet; (61) Within the right-of-way of S.W. 92nd Avenue, beginning at a point which lies one thousand four hundred fifty feet southerly of the south right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road; thence, extending southerly one thousand one hundred ninety feet; excepting therefrom the south six hundred eighty feet of the west half thereof; (62) Along the east side of S.W. 85th Avenue from Durham Road to a point four hundred fifty feet south of the south curbline of Durham Road; (63) On S.W. Varns Street from S.W. 72nd Avenue to a point one hundred twenty-five feet west of the west curbline of 72nd Avenue; (64) On S.W. Watkins Avenue from S.W. Pacific Highway to a point seventy-five feet west of the west curbline of Pacific Highway; (68) Along the south side of Spruce Street between a point one hundred feet east of the extended centerline of S.W. 72nd Avenue and a point 100 feet west of the extended centerline of S.W. 72nd Avenue; (69) Along both sides of S.W. 135th Avenue between Scholls Ferry Road and Morning Hill Drive; (70) Along both sides of S.W. Nimbus Avenue between Scholls Ferry Road and a point two hundred forty feet south of the south curbline of Scholls Ferry Road; (71) Along both sides of S.W. Bonita Road between Hall Boulevard and S.W. 83rd Court; (72) Along both sides of S.W. Bonita Road between 83rd Court and Fanno Creek; (73) Along the east side of S.W. 76th Avenue between Bonita Road and a point one hundred seventy five feet south of the centerline of Bonita Road; (74) Along the north side of Canterbury Lane between Pacific Highway and S.W. 106th Avenue; (75) Along the north side of Benchview 10-28-10 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE Terrace between S.W. 132nd Avenue and the west boundary of Benchview Estates subdivision as recorded in Book 66, page 38, of the plat records of Washington County; (76) Along both sides of S.W. McDonald Street between Hall Boulevard and 93rd Avenue; (77) Repealed by Ord. 95-17. distance of 285 feet measured along the west curb of SW 109th Avenue. (84) Along the east side of SW 109th Avenue beginning at the start of a curve approximately 260 feet south of the south curb line of Canterbury Lane and continuing south a distance of 125 feet measured along the east curb of SW 109th Avenue. (78) Along the west side of S.W. 108th Avenue from Chateau Lane to a point two hundred thirty-three feet south of the centerline of Chateau Lane until such time as 108th Avenue is improved in this location to full minor collector standards. At the time that the street is improved, the effect of the ordinance codified in this subsection (78) shall cease; (79) Along portions of S.W. Fir Street between S.W. 72nd Avenue and the street terminus west of 74th Avenue, as follows: along the entire south side of the street; along the north side of the street within sixty feet of the west curbline of S.W. 72nd Avenue; and along the north side of the street west of a point which is sixty feet west of the centerline of S.W. 74th Avenue; (80) Along both sides of S.W. North Dakota Street between S.W. Tiedeman Avenue and S.W. 115th Avenue. (81) Along both sides of SW Dartmouth Street between SW 68th Parkway and SW Pacific Highway. . (82) Along the west side of SW 108th Avenue between Durham Road and a point 145 feet north of the centerline of Chateau Lane. (83) Along the west side of SW 109th Avenue beginning at the start of a curve approximately 260 feet south of the south curb line of Canterbury Lane and continuing south a (85) Along the south side of Canterbury Lane from Pacific Highway to a point 200 feet east of the east curb line of Pacific Highway; (86) On both sides of SW Durham Road between SW 72nd Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road; (87) On both sides of SW North Dakota Street between Scholls Ferry Road and Springwood Drive; (88) On SW 70th Avenue between Beveland Street and Franklin Street; (89) Along the southwest side of SW Commercial Street beginning a: a point 250 feet southeast of the southeast curb of Main Street and continuing to a point 510 feet southeast of the southeast curb of Main Street; (90) On both sides of SW Walnut Street between the south leg of 135th Avenue and SW Scholls Ferry Road; (91) On both sides of SW Royalty Parkway between Pacific Highway and Naeve Street. (92) Any portion of the right-of-way of SW 76th Avenue beginning at the south right-of-way line of Bonita Road and extending southerly 482 feet. (93) Within the northeast half of SW Commercial Street beginning at a point three 10-28-11 Code Update: 01/00 . TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE hundred forty eight feet southepst of the southeast right-of-way line of SW Main Street and continuing to a point four hundred forty eight feet southeast of Main Street. (Ord. 99-12; Ord. 99- 11; Ord. 98-23; Ord. 98-09; Ord. 96-01; Ord. 95- 32; Ord. 95-25; Ord. 95-23; Ord. 95-17; Ord. 95- 07; Ord. 95-06; Ord. 94-22; Ord. 93-27 §§1, 2, 1993; Ord. 93-26 §1, 1993; Ord. 92-28 §1, 1992; Ord. 92-17 §1, 1992; Ord. 92-11 §1, 1992; Ord. 91-29 §1, 1991; Ord. 91-25 §1, 1991; Ord. 91-24 §1, 1991; Ord. 91-23 §1, 1991; Ord. 91-09 §1, 1991; Ord. 90-42 §1, 1990; Ord. 90-36 §1, 1990; Ord. 90-35 §1, 1990; Ord. 90-34 §1, 1990; Ord. 90-33 §1, 1990; Ord. 90-32 §1, 1990; Ord. 90-31 §1, 1990; Ord. 89-12 §1, 1989; Ord. 88-30 §1, 1988; Ord. 88-05 §1, 1988; Ord. 88-04 §1, 1988; Ord. 87-53 §1, 1987; Ord. 87-46 §1, 1987; Ord. 86-67 §1, 1987; Ord. 87-06 §1, 1987; Ord. 86-55 §1, 1986; Ord. 86-54 §1, 1986; Ord. 86-45A §1, 1986; Ord. 86-13 §1, 1986; Ord. 86-04 §1, 1986; Ord. 84-53 §1, 1984; Ord. 83-50 §1, 1983; Ord. 83-46 §1, 1983; Ord. 83-29 §1, 1983; Ord. 83-28 §1, 1983; Ord. 82-82 §1, 1982; Ord. 82-76 §1, 1982; Ord. 81-80 §1, 1981; Ord. 81-57 §1, 1981; Ord. 81-46 §1, 1981; Ord. 80-65 §§1, 3(part), 1980; Ord. 79-60 §1, 1979; Ord. 79-107 §1, 1979; Ord. 79-113 §1, 1979; Ord. 79-114 §1, 1979; Ord. 79-39 §1, 1979; Ord. 79-9 §1, 1979; Ord. 78-45 §1, 1978; Ord. 78-68 §1, 1979; Ord. 78-39 §1, 1979; Ord. 78-38 §1, 1977; Ord. 77-93 §1, 1977; Ord. 77-92 §1, 1977; Ord. 77-78 §1, 1977; Ord. 77-77 §1, 1977; Ord. 77-73 §1, 1977: Ord. 77-61 §1, 1977; Ord. 77-40 §1, 1977; Ord. 77-39 §1, 1977; Ord. 77-36 §2, 1977; Ord. 77-6 §1, 1977; Ord. 76-56 §1, 1976; Ord. 76-38 §1, 1976; Ord. 76-33 §1, 1976; Ord. 76-31 §1, 1976; Ord. 76-20 §1, 1976; Ord. 76-8 §1, 1976; Ord. 76-7 §1, 1976; Ord. 76-6 §1, 1976; Ord. 75-47 §1, 1975; Ord. 75- 38 §l, 1975; Ord. 75-34 §1, 1975; Ord. 75-51 §1, 1975; Ord. 74-44 §1, 1974; Ord. 71-32 §1, 1971: Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 §14,1970). 10.28.135 Parking prohibited eight a.m. to six P.M. No person shall park or leave standing a vehicle of any kind or character, whether motorized or not, between the hours of eight a.m. and six p.m. on any day of the week, including Saturday and Sunday, on the southerly one-half of the following portion of S.W. Johnson Street, in the city of Tigard, Oregon: That portion of the southerly one-half of S.W. Johnson Street lying westerly of and within four hundred feet of the northwesterly right-of- way line of S.W. Pacific Highway. (Ord. 75-19 §1, 1975). 10.28.136 Loading zones-Authority to establish. (a) The city council may establish loading zones along any street for the purpose of permitting the loading and unloading of merchandise and persons. The action of the city council establishing such loading zones must be taken by ordinance. In establishing loading zones the city council shall give consideration to the volume and nature of business within the area under consideration, the traffic demands upon the street in question, the nature of the need of the adjacent business or businesses and of the needs of other businesses within the immediate area, the width and surface of the street, and any other relevant information. In establishing loading zones, the city council may limit the applicability of the loading zone restriction to certain hours of the day or night. The characterization of the loading zone as an area of restricted parking shall be indicated by the placement of signs which shall indicate clearly the area affected, and which shall state the' hours of the day during which the "loading zone" restricted applies. 10-28-12 Code Update: 01/00 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (b) Loading zones shall be reserved for use by commercial vehicle in loading and unloading persons and commodities during the hours designated on all days except Sundays and holidays. No person shall stop, stand or park any vehicle other than a commercial vehicle within the designated area between such hours, except that noncommercial vehicles may use such zones while actually 'engaged in the loading or unloading of persons or commodities, but noncommercial vehicles shall upon demand give way to commercial vehicles whose drivers desire to use the zone for loading or unloading purposes. Commercial vehicles using loading zones shall be entitled to the use of a loading zone only during such time as may reasonably be necessary for the loading and unloading of persons and materials and for so long as such activity actually continues. Loading zones shall not be used by employees of the business or businesses for the benefit of which they were established, for any purpose except the continuous loading or unloading of persons or materials. 10.28.137 Loading zones-Designated. The following portions of public streets within the city of Tigard are designated as loading zones for the hours indicated: (1) Repealed by Ord. 95-20; (2) Within the easterly half of S.W. 87th Avenue, beginning at a point thirty feet southerly of an easterly extension of the south boundary line of S.W. Center Street and, thence, running southerly sixty feet. The described zone is designated as a loading zone between the hours of nine a.m. to three p.m., Saturdays, Sundays and holidays excluded; (3) Repealed by Ord. 95-20. (Ord. 95-20; Ord. 92-27 §1; 1992; Ord. 86-60 §1, 1986; Ord. 86-14 §1, 1986; Ord. 81-90 §1, 1981; Ord. 76-10 §2, 1976). 10.28.138 Construction zones and temporary loading zones. (c) At all times other than those times designated in the ordinance establishing a particular loading zone, such zones shall be available for general use under the parking regulations applicable to the district in which they are located. (d) The city council shall consider creation of loading zones upon application by any resident or property owner, and if, after consideration of the factors identified in subsection (a) above, the city council determines that a loading zone should be created, it shall create such loading zone by ordinance, and direct that the loading zone so established by marked by appropriate signs. The city shall procure appropriate signs and cause them to be installed. The applicant shall pay the city the cost of the necessary signs and poles and the cost of the labor necessary to install them, and installation shall not be made before such payment. (Ord. 76-10 §1, 1976). (a) Provision for Permits. Any person who finds it necessary to park a motor vehicle for actual construction or maintenance work or who finds it necessary to block off a parking space or spaces along the curb in a zone in which parking is controlled, shall be entitled to a construction zone permit. Any person who finds it necessary in connection with the conduct of a commercial enterprise or in the construction of a building, to park a motor vehicle or to block off a parking space or spaces along the curb for such work shall be entitled to a temporary loading zone permit. Application for a construction zone permit or a temporary loading zone permit shall be made in writing to the chief of police upon a form to be provided by him showing such information as he may request. The chief of police shall make such investigation as he deems necessary and, if he is satisfied that the applicant has a reasonable need for the permit, the chief of police shall issue a 10-28-13 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE construction zone permit or a temporary loading zone permit. (b) Term of Permit. The term of a permit issued by the chief of police pursuant to subsection (a) above shall be established by the chief of police and entered upon the permit but in no event shall a permit be issued for a period to exceed one year. 10.28.140 Violation-Mode of charging defendant. (a) In all prosecutions for violation of city motor vehicle parking laws, it shall be sufficient to charge the defendant by an unsworn written notice if the same clearly states: (1) The date, place and nature of the (c) Fees. The fee for a construction zone permit or a temporary loading zone permit shall be twenty-four dollars for one year or two dollars for each month or portion of a month for periods of less than one year. The fee shall be paid to the chief of police at the time of application. In the event the need for the permit terminates before the end of the term allowed by the permit as issued, the applicant shall be entitled to a refund in the amount of the charge that would have been made for the unused term of the permit. (d) Display of Permit. Before any person shall use a parking space in such a way as to require the issuance of a construction zone or temporary loading zone permit he shall obtain the construction permit or temporary loading zone permit, and at all such times as the vehicle or vehicles shall be parked in the place authorized by such a permit, the permit shall be displayed in such a way as to permit one observing the vehicle from the outside to read it. If the vehicle is equipped with a sunvisor above or beside the windshield on the driver's side, the permit shall be displayed on the sunvisor, which shall be turned down so as to expose the permit toward the outside of the vehicle. (e) The purpose of this section is to permit use of the public streets for parking in circumstances in which parking would otherwise be prohibited or limited as to time pursuant to the ordinances of the city of Tigard. (Ord. 78-75 §2, 1978). charge; (2) The time and place for defendant's appearance in court; (3) The name of the arresting officer; (4) The license number of the vehicle. (b) The notice provided for in subsection (a) of this section shall either be delivered to the defendant or placed in a conspicuous place upon the vehicle involved in the violation. The notice shall serve as the complaint in the case. In all other respects the procedure now provided by law in such cases shall be followed. (Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 § 15, 1970). 10.28.150 Violation-Penalty. Any violation of the provisions of any section of this chapter or any rule or regulation therein stated, shall, upon conviction, be punishable by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars for each violation. (Ord. 70-41 Ch. 7 §30, 1970). 10.28.160 Authority to impound improperly parked vehicles. (a) When any unattended vehicle is parked upon any street, alley or public way of the city of Tigard in such a manner that it is unlawfully parked in any prohibited or restricted area; or is unlawfully parked for a length of time prohibited 10-28-14 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE by ordinance or resolution of this city; or is parked in such a position that it constitutes an obstruction to traffic or creates a danger to travel upon the street, alley or public way; or is found abandoned in any street, alley or public way; or in the event that an operator of a vehicle is arrested and placed in custody and is not in condition to drive the vehicle to a place of safety and there is no other person present who may properly act as agent for such operator to drive the vehicle to a place of safety, such vehicle is declared to be a public nuisance and subject to summary abatement, removal and impounding. 10.28.170 Parking prohibited in specified places. It is unlawful for the driver of a vehicle to stop or park the vehicle, whether attended or unattended, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control signal, in any of the following places: (1) Within an intersection; (2) On a crosswalk; (b) Both the owner and the operator of a vehicle impounded pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall be legally responsible for payment of the costs of towing and storage. The towing and storage charges shall be established in advance, pursuant to an agreement between the police department of the city of Tigard and the towing and storage firm or firms called upon to conduct such business. No charges in excess of those previously agreed upon shall be levied against the owner or operator of a vehicle towed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. (c) The 'towing service called upon to impound a vehicle and finding the owner or driver thereof present shall release the vehicle upon the presentation of proper identification of the owner or operator, and upon the owner or operator's signing an authorized receipt in duplicate (except where exclusive orders are given by the police department that the vehicle be impounded), and a service charge not to exceed one-half of the cost for the towing of the vehicle shall be made, that charge to be paid by the owner or operator. The duplicate signed receipt shall be given to the operator or owner of the vehicle, and the original signed copy shall be recorded by the towing service in its ledger of releases. (Ord. 77-98 §1, 1977). (3) Within fifty feet of any uncontrolled intersection or any intersection controlled with side-mounted stop signs, side-mounted yield signs, or side-mounted signals, except: (A) One one-way streets leaving an intersection; (B) On streets otherwise signed if: i) The vehicle is over six feet in height, or ii) The vehicle is less than six feet in height but by manufacture or modification, obscures the vision of: a. Any official side- mounted traffic control sign or signal, b. Intersection traffic, or c. Any pedestrian in a crosswalk; (iii) Vehicles described in (3)(B) above include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Vehicles with darkened, shaded or curtained windows, 10-28-15 Code Update: 01/00 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE b. Vehicles modified to eliminate side window(s) and/or rear windows, c. Vehicles with visibility through windows blocked by parcels, packages or freight, d. Pickup vehicles of less than six feet in height but mounted with a canopy or camper with limited visibility through it, e. Panel trucks (except those with windows on both sides of the rear portion of the truck, and also on the back of the truck); (iv) An uncontrolled intersection is one where there are no traffic-regulating signs or signals. (4) Any other vehicle not identified in subsection (3) above, within twenty-five feet from the intersection of curb lines, or if none, then within fifteen feet of the intersection of property lines at an intersection within a business or residence district; (5) Within fifteen feet of the driveway entrance to any fire station; (6) Within ten feet of a fire hydrant, save and except taxicabs occupying properly signed taxi zones; (7) In front of a private driveway; taxicabs or other public conveyances may stop for not more than thirty seconds in such a tow-away zone for the purposes of loading and unloading passengers; (11) In front of the entrance of any post office or other place where mail is received; or within ten feet of a mailbox during the hours of eight a.m. to four-thirty p.m. in any residential area; (12) In any street, alley or lane, so as to prevent the free passage of other vehicles in both directions at the same time (except on one-way streets), or so as to prevent any vehicle from turning from one street into another; (13) In any street, alley or lane, in lieu of offstreet parking, for a period longer than forty- eight hours; (14) In any emergency zone; (15) In any loading zone, except as to a commercial vehicle when actually engaged in loading or unloading goods, wares, merchandise or materials, for a period not exceeding twenty minutes; and as taxicabs when loading or unloading passengers or merchandise, for a period of time not exceeding two minutes; (16) In a bus loading zone, except a motor bus or taxicab actually engaged in loading or unloading passengers or merchandise for a period not exceeding two minutes; (8) On a sidewalk or parking strip; (9) On the roadway side of any vehicle stopped or parked at the edge of a street or highway; (10) At any place where official signs, curb paint, or markings have been installed prohibiting standing, stopping or parking; provided, however, driver-attended private passenger motor vehicles, (17) In any construction zone, except by such vehicles as are actually necessary to the construction work being carried on; (18) On city-owned or city-operated property designated for use for motor vehicle parking by authorized city personnel only, without the consent of the city, if there is in plain view on such property a sign prohibiting public parking or 10-28-16 Code Update: 01/00 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE restricting parking; (19) Within any city park or part thereof, during the time the park, or the relevant part of it, is closed to the public. (Ord. 87-70 §1, 1987; Ord. 78-76, 1978). 10.28.175 Residential parking zones. (a) The city council, pursuant to TMC Section 10.32.010 may establish residential parking zones. The purpose of residential parking zones is to prohibit parking by nonresidents during specific time periods within specific geographic areas used predominantly for residential purposes. The city council resolution which establishes the residential parking zone shall clearly define the geographic limits of the area affected by the zone and the hours during which the parking by nonresidents will be prohibited. Residents within the parking zones may obtain a permit from the city administrator pursuant to subsection (b) of this section to allow for the parking of vehicles within the zone during the restricted hours. (b) The city administrator shall establish procedures and standards for the issuance of permanent and temporary permits to residents that will allow the residents and their guests to park their vehicles within residential parking zones during the restricted hours. At a minimum, the administrator shall establish rules which establish the criteria for issuance, surrender and revocation of permits, evidence of proof of residence and vehicle ownership, terms of the permit, standards for display of the permit, and allow for the issuance of temporary permits to residents for the parking of nonresident vehicles for temporary periods upon a showing of reasonable need for such permits. (c) The city administrator shall cause to be installed and maintained, pursuant to TMC 10.32.020, official signs for residential parking zones which clearly identify the parking restrictions for nonresidents and the exception to those restrictions for permit holders within the residential parking zones. (d) It shall be unlawful for any person to: (1) Provide false information in connection with an application for a permanent or temporary permit; (2) Fail to surrender a permit, when requested to do so, when the person is no longer entitled to the permit; (3) Use a permit when the permit holder is no longer entitled to the permit; (4) Use, or allow the use of a permit in conjunction with a vehicle other than the vehicle for which the permit was issued; (5) Use, or allow the use of a temporary permit in a manner inconsistent with the terms and limitations of the permit. (e) The city administrator is authorized to revoke any permit when the permit holder is found to be in violation of the provisions of this section, and, upon written notification thereof, the permit holder shall surrender the permit to the administrator. Failure to do so shall constitute a violation of this section. (Ord. 91-26 §1, 1991). 10.28.180 Definitions for Sections 10.28.190 through 10.28.210. As used in Sections 10.28.190 through 10.28.210 unless the context requires otherwise: (1) "Disabled parking space" means a parking space that is on private or public property and is marked or signed to provide parking for disabled persons. 10-28-17 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (2) "Disabled person" means a person who permanently suffers from any of the following disabilities: (a) Loss or loss of function of one or both legs or significant limitation in the use of the legs; (b) Inability to be mobile without the use of a wheelchair or other assistance device; (c) Loss or loss of function of both hands; (d) Loss of vision or substantial loss of visual acuity or visual field beyond correction; (e) Respiratory disability that makes use of walking as a means of transportation impossible or impractical; or (f) Cardiovascular disability that makes use of walking as a means of transportation impossible or impractical. (3) "Government building" and "public building" have the meanings given those terms in ORS 447.210. (2) Park a marked motor vehicle in any public parking zone with metered parking without being required to pay any parking meter fee. (3) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section do not apply: (a) To parking in zones where stopping, parking or standing of all motor vehicles is prohibited; (b) To late evening or overnight parking where such parking is prohibited; (c) To parking in zones reserved for special types of motor vehicles or activities; or (d) To parking in zones where parking is permitted only for thirty minutes or less. (4) A person who is not disabled as defined in Section 10.28.180, and who exercises the privileges granted a disabled person under this section, commits a parking violation as provided in Section 10.28.150. (Ord. 80-58 §2,1980). 10.28.200 Parking in space reserved for disabled persons prohibited- Exceptions. (4) "Marked motor vehicle" means a motor vehicle conspicuously displaying the decal, insignia or plates issued under the provisions of ORS 487.925. (Ord. 80-58 §1, 1980). 10.28.190 Application of parking regulations to disabled persons. A disabled person may: (1) Park a marked motor vehicle in any public parking zone restricted as to the length of time parking is permitted therein without incurring the penalties imposed for overtime parking in such zones; and (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, no person shall park a vehicle that is not a marked motor vehicle in a disabled parking space. (2) Subsection (1) of this section does not apply: (a) To a vehicle that is momentarily in a disabled parking space for purposes of allowing a disabled person to enter or leave the vehicle. (b) To any disabled parking space that is subject to different provisions or requirements under city ordinance if the different provisions or 10-28-18 Code Update: 01/00 1 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE requirements are clearly posted. (3) Violation of subsection (1) of this section is a parking violation as prohibited in Section 10.28.150. (Ord. 80-58 §3, 1980). 10.28.210 Removal and impoundment of vehicle unlawfully parked in space reserved for disabled persons. A vehicle parked on private property in violation of Section 10.28.200 is subject to the provisions of Section 10.28.160. (Ord. 80-58 §4, 1980). 10-28-19 Code Update: 01/00 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO.01- 2_4- AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 96-08 AND ADOPTING REVISED PROVISIONS RELA i uv it TO i t E LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD. WHEREAS, The City's Tigard Municipal Code Section 2.46 relating to the Local Contract Review Board was last updated in 1996. WHEREAS, The City desires to update and revise provisions relating to the Local Contract Review Board NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Ordinance No. 96-08 is hereby repealed in its entirety and the following is adopted as the revised provisions relating to the Local Contract Review Board. Section 2: Policy 1. All public contracts shall be based upon competitive biding except as expressly provided by State law, this chapter or the rules adopted by the T eeal Gentfa t Board. 2. If federal ftmds are involved in any contract subject to this Chapter, federal laws, riles and regulations shall control in the event of conflict with State law or this Chaffer Section 33: Definitions: As used in this chapter, unless the context requires otherwise: 1 "AR" means City of Tigard administrative purchasing rules adopted by the Board. 4-:2. "Board" means the City of Tigard, Local Contract Review Board. 33. "Competitive Bidding" means the issuing of invitations to bid which follow the formal process for advertising, bid, and bid opening. , 4. "ORS" means Oregon Revised Statutes as applicable and as amended. 35. "Personal Services" means a contract for services performed by an independent contractor in a professional capacity. 46. "Public Contract" means any purchase, lease or sale by the City of personal property, public improvements or services other than agreements, which are for personal services. 37. "Public Improvement" means projects for construction, reconstruction or major renovation on real property by or for a public agency. "Public Improvement" does not include emergency work, minor alteration, ordinary repair or maintenance necessary in order to preserve a public improvement. Section 4: T al Gent feet D,.,.;ew Board: Powers: Authori to adopt rules 1. The eCity Council shall be the }Local eContract Review bBoard. 2. The bBoard shall have all of the powers that may be exercise in the State at large. 3. The bBoard shall adopt rules governing the awarding of-publie-eeakeets CitXcontracts and bidding procedures. I Section 5: The Organization of the bBoard 1. The mayor shall act as the eChairperson of the bBoard. The president of eCouncil shall I act as the vVice-eChairperson. 2. The eChairperson shall preside over the meetings and in the absence of the eChairperson or in the event a vacancy occurs, the line of succession shall be the same as the line of succession which applies to the eCouncil. Section 6: Rules of Procedures Council groundrules will govern proceedings of the bBoard where they do not conflict with these rules or statutory provisions. Section 7: Meetings: Notice: and Agenda 1. The applicable provisions of the Public Meetings Law shall control the notice and character of meetings of the Board. 2. Meetings of the Board may be scheduled at any time including eithe before, during, or i after a regularly scheduled Council meeting. 3. Meetings shall be called in the same manner as a Council meeting. 4. Notice of the meeting shall be given as provided by sState law. Meetings of the Board may be held by conference telephone call after required public notice. The City shall make available to the public at least one place where the public can listen to the meeting by means of a speaker telephone. 6. On urgent or perfunctory matters, the Chairperson may, by telephone, poll the members of the Board. Electronic transcripts of the polling calls will be made and retained. In the course of a poll, any member may request the matter be discussed by conference call or deferred to a meeting. ORDINANCE No. 01-'~ Page 2 7. Prior to conference calls or telephone polls, the press and public, including persons directly interested in the subject matter of the poll, shall be given reasonable notice of a place where they can listen to the meeting or poll at the time of the meeting or poll. 8. The agenda shall be prepared by the City Recorder. tr, will list all pfepesed pending n`• v prepesed disgeeli 4-09. Routine T eeal Gent aet Revie•• Board business may be conducted on the consent agenda of a regularly scheduled Council meeting. Section 8: Attendance: Quorum: Voting 1. Attendance of, at least, three Board members shall be required in order for the Board to take any action. All actions of the Board shall require a majority. vote of the Board I members present and voting. ORDINANCE No. 01- 2-4 Page 3 Section 9: Decisions by the Board 1. The Board shall exercise its rule making power in the same manner that it exercises its legislative power. 2. The Board shall exercise its adjudicative power in the manner provided by State law. Section 10: Records The City Recorder or designee shall be present at all meetings and shall provide for the recordin aAee of all meetings and shall maintain minutes of all meetings as required by law includins any vote taken. 2. The Director of Finance or designee shall maintain the records and prepare findings and reports as required by the Board and the rules adopted by the Board. BeaFd member- .,.~a..,lll-e R of [if[IIGTCCI7T-TJ sfeview:Staff reports shall be provided to each Board member in advance of the date the item is scheduled for review. Section 11: Administrative authority to obligate the ity 1. The Board shall approve all public contracts, and personal services contracts or any We of contract let by the City except as otherwise provided by Section 12. ection 12: Delegation of authority to obligate the City The City AdministfatefManaeer or designee shall have the authority to obligate the City without specific Board approval provided as follows: a. The obligation has been appropriated in an adopted budget. b. The rules adopted by the Board have been complied with as indicated by written findings and records. C. The public contract, of personal services contract or any other We of contract let ! by the Citv does not exceed $25,000. I d. The obligation is for a single complete item or contract and not a part or component of a project. ORDINANCE No. Ol- .2~ Page 4 bills tAil ifes an Fell taxes an ifies a , - , p y Section 13: Authorization to advertise The City Administreter-Manage or designee shall have the authority to approve advertising for all bids. The 1pufebase shEd! be far. an - ideal, 1 ndit r$' Section 15: Limitation to expenditures 1. The delegated authority to obligate the City shall be subject to the following limitations: a. The expenditure shall be for a single complete item or contract; and ~Q: The item Y^7 eemplete et The expenditure shall not be a component of a project with a total cost in excess of $25,000, except in the case of a project which involves a personal services contract and a public contract. If a project involves a personal service contract and a public contract, the two contracts shall be considered separate projects. Section 16: Duties of the City Manager 1. The City Administfater-Manage or designee shall establish and maintain a centralized system for the purchase, contract and sale of property and services. 2. The City AdmiaistfMefMana or designee shall prepare a manual which sets forth the procedures and forms to be used in the award of public contracts, personal services ORDINANCE No. 01-2,'+ Page 5 contracts, construction contracts, and the sale of property for adoption by thQ Board by Resolution. 3 The City "=Manager or designee shall implement the procedures set forth in the manual and, as necessary, shall recommend amendments to the manual to the Board. 1 -.The Din- ete. , IU; Section 1 g: Purchasing from eCity employees 1. The purchase of any supplies, materials, equipment, labor or services, including personal, professional, technical and expert services from any City employee, or any business with which a City employee is associated shall be subject to prior written approval by the City .Adn+i~lyianaaer and approval shall be based upon findings that: a. The purchase will be at the least cost to the City; b. The purchase will result in the most efficient method to accomplish the City's purpose; C. The purchase could not lead to any alleged violations of the Personnel Rules; d. The approval of the purchase could not lead to an adverse employer-employee relationship should the contract be unsatisfactorily performed; and e. All rules adopted by the Board have been satisfied. 2. For purposes of this section "any business with which a City employee is associated" means any business of which the employee is a director, officer, owner or employee, or any g oration in which the Cily_employee owns or has owned +~~~~-10 percent or more of any class of stock ai an rrevc-c. r Yithin the preceding calendar year. Section 19: The Tigard City Council further directs the City Recorder to file this document and any future revisions with the Washington County Board of Commissioners pursuant to ORS 279.055. ORDINANCE No. 01- Page 6 SECTION : This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By LLM11 vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 0'0 day of /\6 MM b"-' , 2001. Greer A. Gaston, Deputy City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this 4 T62 day of AJoYem JuA` . 2001. ames E. riffith ; yor Ap roved as to form: A V_ City Attorney l l f 2--7 Date ORDINANCE No. 01- 24 Page 7 AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS FOR REVIEW NOVEMBER 27, 2001 The Study Session is held In the Red Rock Creek Conference Room. Enter at the back of Town Hall. The Council encourages Interested citizens to attend afl or part of the meeting. If the number of attendees exceeds the capacity of the Conference Room, the Coundl may move the Study Session to the Town Hall. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations and current or potential litigation under ORS 192.660 (1e) and (1 h). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any Information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. ➢ NON AGENDA ITEMS: Mal.& da- =ftj *9) d Tigard Central Business District Association Invoice for Holiday Tree Lighting A motion for Council to authorize payment for Holiday Tree Lighting electrical work Executive Session - The Public Meetings Law authorizes governing bodies to meet in executive session in certain limited situations (ORS 192.660). An "executive session" is defined as "any meeting or part of a meeting of a governing body, which is closed to certain persons for deliberation on certain matters." Permissible Purposes for Executive Sessions: 192.660 (1) (a) - Employment of public officers, employees and agents, if the body has satisfied certain prerequisites. 192.660 (1) (b) - Discipline of public officers and employees (unless affected person requests to have an open hearing). 192.660 (1) (c) - To consider matters pertaining to medical staff of a public hospital. 192.660 (1) (d) - Labor negotiations. (News media can be excluded In this instance.) 192.660 (1) (e) - Real property transaction negotiations. 192.660 (1) (f) - Exempt public records - to consider records that are "exempt by law from public inspection." These records are specifically identified In the Oregon Revised Statutes. 192-660 (1) (g) - Trade negotiations - involving matters of trade or commerce in which the governing body Is competing with other governing bodies. 192.660 (1) (h) - Legal counsel - Executive session are appropriate for consultation with counsel concerning legal rights and duties regarding current litigation or litigation likely to be filed. 192.660 (1) (1) - To review and evaluate, pursuant to standards, criteria, and policy directives adopted by the governing body, the employment-related performance of the chief executive officer, a public officer, employee or staff member unless the affected person requests an open hearing. The standards, criteria and policy directives to be used In evaluating chief executive officers shall be adopted by the governing body In meetings open to the public in which there has been an opportunity for public comment. 192.660 (1) Public investments - to carry on negotiations under ORS Chapter 293 with private persons or businesses regarding proposed acquisition, exchange or liquidation of public investments. 192.660 (1) (k)- Relates to health professional regulatory board. Agenda Item No. 4- / Meeting of - 26, - OZ MINUTES TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 27, 2001 Mayor Griffith called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. Council Present: Mayor Griffith, Councilors Dirksen, Moore, Patton, and Scheckla (arrived at 6:40 p.m.). Executive Session was called to order at 6:35 p.m. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations and current and potential litigation under ORS 192.660(1 e) and (1h). Executive Session adjourned 7:26 p.m. 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 The meeting of the Tigard City Council 8z Local Contract Review Board was called to order by Mayor Griffith at 7:34 p.m. 1.2 Council Present: Mayor Griffith, Councilors Dirksen, Moore, Patton, and Scheckla 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications 8z Liaison Reports - None 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items City Manager Bill Monahan stated that the Tigard Central Business District Assocition's invoice for holiday tree lighting electrical work should be added to the agenda. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: Before considering the consent agenda, Councilor Patton asked City Engineer Gus Duenas to discuss the process related to the resolution of necessity. Mr. Duenas stated that the City would make every effort to negotiate an amicable agreement with the property owners. If this is not possible, Mr. Duenas stated he would return to the Council to get their approval prior to condemnation. COUNCIL MINUTES - November 27, 2001 page 1 Motion by Councilor Dirksen, seconded by Councilor Patton to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: 3.1 Approve Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Properties for the Gaarde Street Improvements (Phase 2) Project - Resolution No. 01- 71 The motion was approved by a unanimous vote: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Patton - Yes Councilor Scheckla - Yes 4. UPDATE ON BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY Community Development Director Jim Hendryx introduced this topic and gave a PowerPoint presentation. A copy of the presentation is on file in the City Recorder's office. Mr. Hendryx concluded his presentation by saying that there would be a public meeting in January to discuss annexation with Bull Mountain residents. Focus group participants from the July 2001 meeting will be notified of the January meeting. Copies of the Bull Mountain Annexation Study can be purchased or reviewed at the Community Development counter in City Hall. The Study can also be found on the City's web site. Councilor Moore stated he would be interested to hear the public's comments regarding the annexation. He expressed concern about the "price tag" of annexation for both the City and Bull Mountain residents. Councilor Patton noted the projected revenue shortfalls associated with annexation, and questioned where funding would come from. She pointed out the estimated tax increase for a $227,000 home is $256. Mayor Griffith advised that if the annexation was not to the mutual benefit of Bull Mountain residents and the City, then the City would not pursue annexation. Discussion of three pending applications for annexation ensued. Mr. Hendryx stated he would like the Councilors to attend the January meeting with Bull Mountain residents. In response to a question from Mayor Griffith, Mr. Hendryx stated that the Urban Reserve Area had not been factored into the annexation calculations. Mayor Griffith commended staff on the Study. COUNCIL MINUTES - November 27, 2001 page 2 5. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE REFERENCE TO OREGON REVISED TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHANGING STATUES AND ELIMINATING THE TERM "HOUSE TRAILER" Police Chief Ron Goodpaster introduced this item. Chief Goodpaster explained that the amendments would eliminate a double reference within the Code and would eliminate the term "house trailer," which is not defined under Oregon Revised Statues. Motion by Councilor Patton, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Ordinance No. 01-23. ORDINANCE NO. 01-23 - NMUNICIPAL CODE AMENDING 10.28.030 OF THE TIGARD MU ORS AND ELIMINATING THE TERM "HOUSE TRAILER." The motion was approved by a unanimous vote: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Patton - Yes Councilor Scheckla - Yes ORDINANCE 96 -08 AND 6. CONSIDER ORDINAR CMUNICIPALL CODES PROVISIONS PERTAINING ADOPTING REVISED TlG TO THE LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD Financal Operations Manager Tom lmdieke introduced Buyer Terry Muralt. Ms. Muralt described the proposed changes to the Code as listed on the Council Agenda Item Summary, which is on file in the City Recorder's Office. Motion by Councilor Patton, seconded by Councilor Dirksen, to adopt Ordinance No. 01-24. H H ORDINANCE NO. 01-24 - AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE 96- 08 AND ADOPTING REVISED PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE LOCAL d CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD a The motion was approved by a unanimous vote: COUNCIL MINUTES - November 27, 2001 page 3 Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Patton - Yes Councilor Scheckla - Yes 7. VOTE ON THE CITY OF TIGARD'S CHOICE FOR THE WASHINGTON COUNTY OTHER CITIES ALTERNATE POSITION - METRO POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (MPAC) City Manager Monahan discussed this item. Washington County has both a regular and an alternate member on MPAC. A recent vacancy has occurred in the alternate position and the Council has the opportunity to vote on who should fill this position. The nominees are Angela Weeks, a Sherwood City Councilor, and ]im Griffith, Mayor of Tigard. The City of Tigard has one vote. Motion by Councilor Dirksen, seconded by Councilor Patton, to cast Tigard's vote for ]im Griffith. The motion was approved by majority vote: Mayor Griffith Councilor Dirksen Councilor Moore Councilor Patton Councilor Scheckla Abstained Yes Yes Yes Yes 8. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS - None. 9. NON AGENDA ITEMS Tigard Central Business District Association (TCBDA)Tree Lighting Invoice City Manager Bill Monahan described the TCBDA's request for the City to pay $4,900.49 to cover the cost of providing electrical service to the City-owned park. The electrical service was needed to light the holiday tree. Mr. Monahan reminded Council that this item had been discussed at an earlier meeting, and Mr. Tyler Ellenson of the TCBDA had now presented the City with the final bill. Mr. Monahan recommended the Council approve payment of $4,900.49 to TCBDA to be paid to Oregon Electric Group. COUNCIL MINUTES - November 27, 2001 page 4 Councilor Moore asked if funding was coming from money allocated to the TCBDA during the budget process. Mr. Monahan confirmed that there had been $26,667 allocated to the TCBDA, and this was the only expenditure he was aware of. He continued by saying the $4,900.49 would be deducted from the $26,667. In response to an inquiry from the Mayor, Councilor Moore stated that the electrical box was permanent, while the electrical connection was temporary. It is anticipated that the TCBDA will return to the City for an additional $8,000 to $10,000 for a permanent connection. Councilor Patton confirmed that the permanent connection would need to be placed underground in order to meet City code. Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Patton, to authorize payment for the electrical work performed for the TCBDA holiday tree lighting event. The motion was approved by majority vote: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Yes Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Patton - Yes Councilor Scheckla - Yes Councilor Dirksen reminded the Council that he would not be attending the December 11, 2001, Council meeting. 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION - No Executive Session was held. 11. The meeting was adjourned at 8:17 p.m. Greer A. Gaston, Deputy City Recorder Attest: Y ayor City o ' a ate: -D. 1"d \\TI G333\US R\DEPTS\ADM\CATHY\CCM\011127.DOC COUNCIL MINUTES - November 27, 2001 page 5 AGENDA ITEM NO.2 - VISITORS AGENDA DATE : November 27, 2001 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Manager prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED ' VISITOR'S AGENDA Page 1 AGENDA ITEM # Z, i FOR AGENDA OF November 27, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Properties for the Gaarde Street Improvements PREPARED BY: Vannie en DEPT HEAD OK A.P. Duen CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall City Council approve the attached resolution declaring the need to acquire properties for the construction of the Gaarde Street Improvements (Phase 2) project? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council approve, by motion, the attached resolution declaring the need to acquire property for the construction of the project. INFORMATION SUMMARY The improvement of Gaarde Street between Walnut Street and Highway 99W is divided into two phases. The first phase of the project between Walnut Street and the Quail Hollow subdivision is identified as Gaarde Street Improvements (Phase 1). Construction of the first phase was completed in August 2001. The second phase of the project is the reconstruction and widening of Gaarde Street between 121st Avenue and Highway 99W. This phase of the project is identified as Gaarde Street Improvements (Phase 2) and includes installation of a new traffic signal at the Gaarde Street/l21st Avenue intersection and improvement to the 121st Avenue approach north of the intersection. The project design is nearing completion and will be advertised for bids sometime in late January of 2002. Bidding the project in early 2002 would allow construction of the project to begin in the spring with the intent of completing all construction work by the end of calendar year 2002. To ensure timely construction of the project, all properties needed for the improvements must be acquired as soon as possible. The resolution of necessity for this project directs the City Manager and City's attorneys to attempt to negotiate a satisfactory agreement for purchase of each of the properties. In the event that satisfactory agreements cannot be reached, the resolution authorizes legal action in accordance with the provisions of ORS 281.510 to acquire the properties for timely implementation of the construction project. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Delay implementation of the Gaarde Street (Phase 2) project and continue to negotiate until all properties are acquired. ATTACHMENT LIST Resolution of Necessity with attached Exhibit A VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY The improvements proposed for the extension of Gaarde Street meet the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow goals of Improve Traffic Safety and Improve Traffic Flow. FISCAL NOTES The design and land acquisition necessary for the project are funded from Traffic Impact Fee funds in the FY 2001-2002 Capital Improvement Program. IACitywide\.Sum\Resolution of Necessity for Gaarde Street - Phase 2 AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF November 27, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE 1'r 2VA06~K PREPARED BY: Barbara Shields DEPT HEAD OK gut Y MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Review the draft study and provide staff with any comments/suggestions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION N/A. Review only. INFORMATION SUMMARY At the March 20, 2001 City Council work session, Council directed staff to review the possibilities of annexing the Bull Mountain area. Following the. Council directive, staff prepared a study, which would be used to evaluate a range of policy recommendations related to the Bull Mountain area. Staff will provide Council a draft copy of "The Bull Mountain Annexation Study" and a draft copy of "The Bull Mountain Annexation Frequently Asked Questions" that will be briefly discussed at the November 13, 2001 study session meeting. Council will have an opportunity to review the materials and provide staff with comments and questions at the November 20, 2001 work session meeting. Staff will then come back to the Council meeting on November 27, 2001 with a final report, which will include Council's comments and suggestions. This document will serve as the basis for the public outreach component in December 2001. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Not applicable. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Growth and Growth Management Goal #2, Urban services are provided to all citizens within Tigard's urban growth boundary and recipients of services pay their share. ATTACHMENT LIST None. FISCAL NOTES N/A I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final Report\11-27ccreport.doc DRl'lg' 1 For Internal Ra ew THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY CITY OF TIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LONG-RANGE PLANNING NOVEMBER, 2001 NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 0 lALRPLN\Barbata\ANNEXATION Final ReporAl1 02 01 DraR.doc DRAF -f For Internal ReUi w THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY FOR SPECIFIC QUESTIONS, CONTACT THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE AT 503/639-4171: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JAMES N.P. HENDRYx, EXT. 405 jRvIH@CI.TIGARD.OR.US FINANCE DEPARTMENT CRAIG PROSSER, EXT. 345 CRAIG@CI.TIGARD.OR.US PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ED WEGNER, EXT. 396 ED@CI.TIGARD.OR.US POLICE DEPARTMENT - 503/639-6168 RON GOODPASTER, EXT. 218 00859@CI.TIGARD.OR.US ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GUS DUENAs, EXT. 378 GUS Cox CI.TIGARD.OR,US NOVEMBER 2001 CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 1 1ALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATI0N Final Report\l 102 01 DraR.doc , DRA 1 For Internal Rezim THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY 'T'ABLE OF C ONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION . 1. STUDY AREA PROFILE............ 2. URBAN SERVICES IN THE STUDY AREA . 3. COSTS AND REVENUE OF ANNEXATION UNDER CURRENT CONDITIONS - SCENARIO 1 4. COSTS AND REVENUE OF ANNEXATION LONG TERM CONDITIONS - SCENARIOS 2 AND 3 5. ANNEXATION AND TAXATION 6. CONCLUSIONS APPEND ICES APPENDIX A. COST AND REVENUE ANALYSIS BY SUBAREAS APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS APPENDIX C. COST AND REVENUE ANALYSIS BY FUNDS APPENDIX D. ANNEXATION AND TAXATION APPENDIX E. METHODS OF ANNEXATION MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION QUESTION AND ANSWER APPENDIX F. BULL PACKET NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXA'T'ION STUDY PAGE 2 lALRP1.N\Barbam\ANNFXATI0N Final Report\1102 01 DraRdoc DRA 1 For Internal Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since adoption of the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan in the mid-1980s, the Bull Mountain area has been identified as eventually being within the City limits of Tigard In 1993, the State Legislature passed Senate Bill 122, which required the coordination and provision of urban services for lands within the Urban Growth Boundary. In 1997, Tigard and Washington County entered into an urban services agreement that transferred land development and building permit activity to the City. The Tigard City Council established a goal for 2001 to establish an annexation policy for non-island area, such as Bull Mountain, and directed staff to study the feasibility of annexing the Bull Mountain area. "The Bull Mountain Annexation Study" is an outcome of Council's direction. "The Bull Mountain Annexation Study" provides a context for policy issues related to annexation of Bull Mountain. Since the demand for services and generated revenue is dependent on the number of people living in the area, the study examines the costs and revenues of annexation based on growth scenarios. Three growth scenarios were developed for the purpose of this study: current conditions (Scenario 1), buildout (Scenario 2) and moderate development (Scenario 3). A comparative analysis of the three scenarios constitutes the quintessential portion of this study. Scenario 1 assumes that no future growth occurs in the area and is used as a starting point for a comparative analysis. Scenario 2 assumes that all buildable land will be developed and built out at the maximum densities under current land use regulations. Scenario 3 assumes that development will occur at lower density (50% of the "buildout" growth). While Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 reflect two extreme conditions for comparison purposes, Scenario 3 provides a conservative estimate of what could occur in the study area. A capital improvement funding strategy for roads and parks is the key policy issues in all three scenarios. The estimated need to provide an adequate level of service for parks and roads is the most critical aspect in evaluating the Bull Mountain annexation issues. Furthermore, the projected park and transportation improvement cost, exceed the projected revenues in the three scenarios. This report does not contain a fully developed strategy addressing the funding issues. However, it does identify the discussion parameters to provide a context for the decision making process. A possible strategy would consist of a variety of alternatives, as identified in Section 6 of the report: • Use a portion of the General Fund to address capital improvements. • Assistance from Washington County to address some or all of the capital improvement needs. • Form Local Improvement Districts to address specific capital improvement needs, such as parks and roads. • Delay improvement of streets until funding sources are available. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 3 lALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final ReporAl 1 02 01 DraR.doc DRAFT For Inowa Rniew u Obtain grant fundings to address portions of capital improvements. u Identify the effective sequence of annexing specific sub-areas of Bull Mountain. The study identifies several alternatives and policy choices for Council's review and discussion over the next few months. Public outreach must follow. Ultimately, annexation of the Bull Mountain study area is a policy issue that deserves considerable discussion by the City and those people most affected. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 4 lAl,RPLN\Barbam\ANNEXAT[AN Final ReporAl 1 02 01 thakdoc DRAFT' For InireMaal Review INTRODUCTION One of the Tigard City Council Goals is to provide urban services to all citizens within Tigard's urban growth boundary and that recipients of services pay their share. In March 2001, the Tigard City Council directed staff to conduct a study of the Bull Mountain area (see map on page 6) to help Council evaluate policy recommendations related to annexation of the Bull Mountain area. The purpose of this study is to determine if the City of Tigard should pursue annexation based on an analysis of annexation's costs and benefits to both the City and current Bull Mountain residents. In order to be assured this study addressed the concerns of Bull Mountain residents, the City and Washington County held a Focus Group meeting in July 2001. The Focus Group meeting gave residents an opportunity to ask questions related to the Bull Mountain area. The meeting was attended by over 100 people and provided a direct input to the scope of the study. As an outcome of this effort, two documents were initiated. The first is "The Bull Mountain Annexation Study" and the second document is the "Bull Mountain Annexation Question and Answer Packet.." The study report is divided into six main sections. Section 1 provides background and a current profile of the study area in terms of population, development and zoning. Section 2 provides information on the levels of urban services provided to study area residents. Sections 3 & 4 examine the costs and revenues of annexation based on three growth scenarios: current conditions, buildout, and moderate development. Section 5 provides information on how annexation will affect taxation rates for residents, and how it will affect expenditures and revenues for the City. Section 6 summarizes the findings and raises key policy issues for Council to consider. Appendices A through F provide detailed background information, which was used in preparing the report and the "Bull Mountain Annexation Question and Answer Packet.." NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 5 lALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final ReporAl102 01 DraR.doc DST For Internal Reim 1. Study Area Profile The Bull Mountain Study Area consists of approximately 1,440 acres of land located west of the City of Tigard (see Map below) in Washington County, within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) . The Study Area abuts Beaverton and Tigard on the north and east, respectively, King City to the southeast, and unincorporated County land outside the Urban Growth Boundary to the south and west. The land in the Study Area is sloped- steeply in some areas- allowing for views at higher elevations. Traditionally a farming area, the last decade brought additional home developments to the area. Today, both farms and subdivisions co- exist here. Although the identified area is now outside the City limits, the City of Tigard provides many urban services to residents. In 1997, the City of Tigard and Washington County entered into an Urban Services Agreement, which transferred responsibility for land use decisions, building and development related engineering to the City of Tigard. The County adopted the City of Tigard Community Development Code for the Buli Mt Study,AreaJVi coni4j/ Map 7 ' _ L__ _j 7 . PorEian ' Be verto z I ~ Tiard, y S, e9a'. dull Mt Study Area / uala cm ornoum_.,.. , Bull mountain area, which applies standards to any new development in the area.' Currently, approximately 7,300 people live in the Study Area, according to 2000 Census data. There is no commercial or industrial zoned land in the Study Area. Most of the property is zoned R-7, a medium density residential zone requiring lots of a minimum of 5,000 square feet. The area consists of a combination of (1) a mix of larger undeveloped lots, (2) larger lots developed through the County under different standards, and (3) smaller lots that are built to the minimum density allowed under the current zoning regulations. Given the existing development pattern and topography, this study divides the Bull Mountain area into 4 subareas: North, South, East and West (see map, next page). I Section 2 of this report further discusses current and anticipated service provisions for the Study Area. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 6 1ALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATI0N Final ReporAl 1 02 01 Drag doc DR!'1l' 1 For Internal Raiew North This subarea is located south of Barrows Road, north of Baker Lane and Roshak Road, east of the urban growth boundary and west of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) easement line. The North area consists of approximately 383 acres and a population of 2,813. This area has a combination of R-7, R-12 and R-25 zoning; however, all of the higher-density (R-25) residential lots were developed as single-family home subdivisions. While there are several larger lots, there are very few redevelopable or vacant lots in this area due to steep slopes. This area is largely built out with only about 10% of the area identified as vacant or redevelopable. Based on the household growth rate of 2.2% identified by Metro, it is estimated that this area will be built out in 4.5 years. West The western subarea is bordered on the south.and west by the Urban Growth Boundary. It is bordered on the east by SW 150'h and to the north by Roshak Road and Baker Lane. The western area consists of approximately 259 acres with 944 people. The majority of the area has been developed with large lot subdivisions, which are not expected to be divided further. However, 15.3% of the land in this area is identified as vacant or redevelopable. The zoning in this area is R-7 (medium density residential). Based on the 2.2% household growth rate identified by Metro, it is estimated that this area will be built out in 6.9 years. South This subarea is generally located west of SW Peachtree, east of SW 150`h, north of Beef Bend Road and south of High Tor Drive. The southern area consists of approximately 507 acres of land. and 3,077 people. The zoning is primarily R-7 (medium density residential) with a small portion of R-25 (medium-high density residential) to the south between Foxglove #2 subdivision and Beef Bend Heights. Many of the subdivisions were developed with large lots that are not expected to be divided further, as a result, this area has larger lots with only limited infill potential. This area has about 10.6% vacant or redevelopable land. Based on the 2.2% household growth rate identified by Metro, it is estimated that this area will be built out in 4.8 years. East This area is generally located east of the Mountain Gate subdivision, south of Bull Mountain Road and north of Beef Bend Road The eastern area consists of approximately 282 acres with 434 people. This area has most of the Study Area's growth potential, with almost 40 percent of the land identified as vacant or redevelopable. The zoning is R-7, which calls for a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. Based on the 2.2% household growth rate identified by Metro, it is estimated that this area will be built out in 18 years. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 8 lALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final Report\l 102 01 Dmft.doc DRAFT For Internal Review Table 1, Bull Mountain Study Area Profile Bull Mountain Study Area Profile Study Area is 1,440 ac, or 2.25 sq miles, or 62,726,400 square feet' Total Assessed Acres is 1130 ac or 1.77 sq miles North West South East Total Total Acreage 383.8 259 507. 282.3 1 1432. Total Population 2000 Census 2813 944 307 434 72681 Median Average Household Size 2.85 3.00 3.0 1.88 1 2.921 Number of Housing Units 948 331 110 1601 25451 Total Assessed Value BI and land)* 98 668 803.00 102 772 030.0 261,492,712.0$ 61 350 130.0 624,283,675.011 Median Assessed Value bid and land 174 440.00 215 960.0 239 550. 283,760 .0 227 755.0 % Remainin for Development 10.0% 15.3% 10.6°/ 39.9°/ n.a Projected Rate of Population Grow1h 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0°/ 2.0% Pro ected Timeline to Reach Buildo t 4.5 years 6.9 years 4.8 years 18 years ' Data from Magic, Sept. 2001, which reflects Wash. Cly. Tax Assessor's records. Note: Subarea totals do not add up to the overall total due to scale; these are only approximations This total is less than the 2 143 from the overall calcuation; this reflects rounding down Also, please note that GiS sq It was used, which is not as accurate as surveyor's measurements. All square footage is approximated. 1 From Metro's Data Resource Center. 2 Also from Metro. Based on household growth rate for the City of Tigard at 2.2 percent. The above table provides a general overview of the Bull Mountain area by four subareas. The following is a summary of the major assumptions and sources, which were utilized in preparing Table 1: • population, housing unit and household data were obtained from Census 2000 information; • land data and assessed value information were obtained from the City's MAGIC GIS system, which uses Washington County Tax Assessor data, • the growth projections utilize Metro's 2.2 percent growth rate for households or housing units, and 2.0 percent for population.; this rate could vary based on the economy and other factors;' • "Redevelopable land" refers to partially developed lots; these large lots are not built to minimum density, and could potentially be subdivided for "infill." 2 The City has approved approximately eight subdivisions in this area with approximately 432 lots total. All lots and infrastructure in these subdivisions were built to City standards. It is not anticipated that growth will continue at this rate, however. Therefore, for this study, the Metro assumptions of 2% were used to develop future population forecasts, and 2.2% for future housing units. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 9 1ALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATI0N Final ReporAl 1 02 01 DrafLdoc DRAFT For Intl Review 2. URBAN SERVICES IN THE STUDY AREA As stated earlier, although the Study Area lies in uninco_*porated Washington County, the City of Tigard already provides some urban services to residents. In 1997, the City of Tigard and Washington County entered into an Urban Services Agreement, which transferred responsibility for land use decisions, building and development related engineering to the City of Tigard. The remainder of the Study Area's services are provided by either Washington County or regional service agencies, such as Clean Water Services, etc. Table 2, next page, identifies each service for the Study Area., the current provider, and compares the current level of services to the projected level of services under annexation. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL 1 ouwAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 10 1ALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATI0N Final Report\l 102 01 DraR.doc DRA g For Internal Ra ew Table 2: Service Provision in the Bull Mountain Study Area Police Washington County provides f Tigard would provide the Ci Yes 1.0 officers/1000 people :L 15 oflicers/10~0 people There would be (.5 standard; .5 from Enhanced Patrol) an increase of approximately .5 officers/1000 people Fire/Rescue Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue provides'.: 'Tuala.iin Valley:Fi e,&'Rescue No services. contmui s to provide services. Parks Washington County doesnotprovide Tigard'iT- aiks standard is 7.65 acres Yes parks services. for eve' :1,000 residents: This The City iacludes'Greenways, trails, open provides park :space and-,improve services. parks could be provided`in Bull 146,untau4the City rat o would be appOx'irnafel~ ~4/1Q00 General Road Washington-County through'the urban Th`e~Crty' toad)mtenance l n Yes Th Cit Maintenance Road Maintenance:Distnct::General, egu ar rp'e oru~s mauttenance o e y. , street maintenance'by the County is sche~dules'aS,,vp ll+as on a complaint provides primarily on a,complamt driven-.basis ' driven basis T ical maintenance h ' additional road n e i rriaintena.nce activities include f Typical inclu viries a c ma ntena 'services. • pothole.pat6Wg + pothole patching • grading graveled roads grading graMed loads • cleaning drauiage facilities cleaning drau►age'facililies. • . street sweeppi' street sweeping • mowing roadside grass.and brush b . avowing roadside grass'and (only the shoulder stns); s ti bFusfi'(shouider step + ditch . mamtaiiimg traffic signals 'k e) r • replacing damaged signs ! iAintaunng trafl"ac signals ' t replacing dariiage., signs ahsWiiiig and replacing street markings a crack seal vegetation removal for vision clearance e?` stieeE`laght.tree.trimming for Ai-hi clearance. dust,abaterient on graveled roads Sanitary Sewer Clean Water Services (OWS) ' Tate Gttyrof TtV& -d vtiall rrteet the same level of service as CWS. x+:11 {sergcelevels •for. CV11S and surrounding s6ns :must-be ` `uniform by July 2003 NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 11 lALRPLN\BarbaraWNNEXATION Final ReporAl 1 02 01 DraR.doc H rn H a N . DRAFT For Intemal Ra ew Storm Sewer Water Street Light Maintenance Development and Building Services Library Clean Water Services (CWS) Intergovernmental Water Board contracts with the Tigard Water District to provide water. • r he Cityof Tigard wiltmeet the same level of service as CWS. All .service levels.'for CWS and surrounding jurisdictions must be uniform by july 2003. Service remains the same. Tigard No WateiDistrict will continue to provide water but will bill directly. Washington County administers, `-.The Ci}y',of Tigard will assume all I ice remains Serv e but th Service Districts for Lighting for PGE.• and street light rations ' e sam Residents pay an annual operations and s. . mamtenance~for existing light te property owners assessed ot re maintenance assessment. Reis &d n s do not pay a separa e n , a for the nt assessm operation of the -lights:.: The City of Tigard provides building `The City:of,Tigard will continue to ` ;(3nly change in that i i services= includingaanduse decisions, services to this area ;provjde:bunlding x s ce serv the City reviews building and engineering-under, an intergovernmental agreement With . MUTiri" 'use'tlecisnons will continue dgis'lative t Washington County. fhbete tevle' undgrAo'Chty,,. siattdads~~and though tleCity's ters. ma All land use decisions are reviewed 'heanng.~process~; The Citywould be under the City standards and through he re` the City'stearing process with the. action exception,of-legislative actions..(zone -comp! Changes, Comprehensive Plan <retc) amendments, etc:) Washington County Cooperative " Thee Library Services (WCCLS) hr fnr;trv,sia$ve a appro. Consortium,-which provides' f -in ing } through4he countytax io areailibianes, L Including.Tigard. , .Schools Both theBeayerton SchoolDlstnctand the' TigardSchool District provide. service based'on'thstnct: boundaries il. s s d well'(zone changes, . bli8ps.. I- aznondments, ' i itv of,I'igard, whihh receives No NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY I:UMLN\Barbara\ANNEXATl0N Final Rgmrt\l 102 01 Dratt.doc PAGE 12 DRAFT For Internal Ra iew 3. COSTS AND REVENUE OF ANNEXATION UNDER CURRENT CONDITIONS - SCENARIO 1 Introduction The previous section showed how annexation would affect services in the Bull Mountain area; however, there are additional considerations affecting the City's decision to annex. The City must also project the study area's demand for services and the cost and revenue of providing those services. The following section looks closely at the City's projected revenues and costs to serve the study area if it were annexed in the near future. For estimation purposes, this scenario (Scenario 1) assumes that all currently approved subdivision lots will be built with no future growth occurring. While it is highly unlikely that no further land development will occur, this scenario creates a starting point for evaluation. Service Demand The demand for services in the Study Area is dependent on the number of people living in the Study Area, and the number of housing units. The area has approximately 7,300 residents living in 2,545 housing units, according to Census 2000 data. As of this date, an additional 164 building lots have been approved. Assuming that all approved lots are built, it is expected that over 2,700 housing units and 7,680 people will live in the Study Area, under current conditions. The major objective of the report is to examine costs and revenues associated with the City services for the entire area. This provides a solid understanding of the key-parameters affecting the area which will ultimately help in the decision making process. It should be emphasized that the amount of services required for the study area will also vary by subareas due to differences in population and development densities. Appendix A provides details on all four subareas. This information could be used in examining specific strategies for different subareas. Based on the projected population and number of housing units, Table 3, next page, contains the City's expected revenues, operating costs, and capital improvement costs associated with each City fund for the entire Study Area. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXA'T'ION STUDY PAGE 13 lALRPLN\BarbaraWNNEXATION Final ReporAl 1 02 01 praR.doc Table 3 DRAFT For Internal Raiav Projected Revenues and Costs by Funds for Bull Mountain Area (Scenario 1) Costs Fund General State Gas Tax Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Water One-time Capital Costs Fund Traffic Impact Fee Parks SDC Water SDC Revenue ! Operating I Cost $2,161,822 1,298,469 $319,081 391,932 $202,904 $85,597 $97,524 78,188 $1,767,550 691,659 Fund Balance/ Capital Improvements 'apital Revenues $370,640 0 $268,960 $13,105,000 $334,724 0 Balance $863,353 ($72,851) $117,307 $19,336 $1,075,891 Balance $370,640 ($12,836,040) $334,724 Based on the above table, the following is a summary of issues that need to be addressed in considering annexation of the Bull Mountain area: • with the exception of the State Gas Tax Fund, the operating costs are significantly less than the respective revenues for allfunds; e annexing the study area in the near future would create a significant need for land and park improvements to meet the City's current level of services for parks; the projected park improvement (CIP) costs (Appendix B), exceed the projected revenue (park SDCs) approximately 49 times; e there is a need for water system improvements that need to be addressed regardless of annexation. Sufficient revenue is projected to address capital needs. Summary: The estimated need to provide an adequate level of service for parks is the most critical aspect in evaluating the Bull Mountain area annexation in the near future. Capital costs for transportation are not assured with this assumption. However, transportation improvements ultimately will be needed. Scenarios 2 and 3 identify potential capital needs, however, a certain level of transportation improvements will also be needed with Scenario 1. Scenario 1 does not reflect capital improvements for transportation. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 14 I:\LRPLN\Barbam\ANNEXATION Final Repordi 1 02 01 Draft.doc DRAFI' For do mdl Review 4. THE COSTS AND REVENUES OF ANNEXATION IN THE LONG TERM - SCENARIOS 2 AND 3 Introduction The previous section (Section 3) showed the Study Area's estimated demand for services based on current population and housing units. However, for purposes of calculation, Scenario 1 assumes no further growth. Bull Mountain will continue to grow in the long term and, therefore, this must be considered. This section examines two additional scenarios, Scenario 2 and Scenario 3. Both of these scenarios assume future growth in the Study Area will consist of 5,000-sq.ft. lots with single-family housing units. This assumption is based on the current R-7 medium density residential zoning, which requires a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. Both growth scenarios are based on the following assumptions: • Future growth projections are based on the amount of "net buildable land" in the Study Area. "Net buildable land" refers to available land that can accommodate housing units. This excludes land that is publicly owned, owned or under option by the Trust for Public Lands, reserved for right-of-way, wetlands, with a slope exceeding 25 percent, or already developed to its minimum development potential. This also excludes all lots in existing and approved subdivisions. • Buildable land consists of two categories: vacant and partially developed. Vacant lands are those without housing units. Partially developed lots are oversized lots that are not built to the minimum density, and have the potential to be divided. • Both scenarios are based on aerial photographs and tax assessor data in determining the net buildable land in the Study Area. Scenario 2: "Buildout" This scenario assumes that all buildable lands will be developed and "built-out" by the year 2019. Based on current average household sizes, it is projected that the Study Area would have 12,905 residents and 4,824 housing units. Based on the number of additional homes and residents projected in this scenario, service demand would increase. Table 4 details those changes by examining each of the City's expected revenues, operating costs, and capital improvement costs associated with each City fund at the buildout. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 15 lALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final ReporAl 102 01 DraR.doc 1JR 1C' 1 For Inxt nz l Renew Table 4 Projected Costs and Revenues by Fund for Bull Mountain Area at Buildout (Scenario 2) Ongoing OveratinL, Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $3,806,006 $2,260,681 $1,545,325 State Gas Tax $535,816 $628,011 ($92,195) Sanitary Sewer $361,318 $143,739 $217,579 Storm Sewer $173,664 $131,300 $42,364 Water $1,767,550 691,659 $1,075,891 One-time Cavital Costs I Fund I Fund Balance/ I Capital Improvements Balance Capital Revenues Traffic Impact Fee $5,150,540 $12,718,600 ($7,568,060) Parks SDC $3,737,560 $22,033,000 ($1S,295,440) Water SDC $4,651,439 $816,400 $3,835,039 Based on the above table, the following is a summary of issues that need to be addressed in considering annexation of the Bull Mountain area: e with the exception of the State Gas Tax Fund, the operating costs are significantly less than the respective revenues for all funds; e as compared to scenario 1, the needed operating costs will more than double to serve the entire Bull Mountain area at buildout, which is proportional to the population and development increase; e the significant need for road improvements and parks (Appendix B) would be the major consideration in the development and annexation of the Bull Mountain area; e the projected park and transportation improvement (CEP) costs (Appendix B), exceed the projected revenue. Summary: The estimated need to provide an adequate level of service for parks and roads is the most critical aspect in evaluating the Bull Mountain area annexation at buildout. Revenues for these improvements do not fully address capital costs. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE .16 [ALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXAT[ON Final ReporAl 1 02 01 Draftdoc Scenario 3: Moderate Growth DIZAF1' For Iniaernd Review Introduction This scenario assumes that development will occur- at a lower density, or 50% of the new growth in Scenario 2. Scenario 3 allows for current land-use patterns on Bull Mountain, which includes the following. some existing lots are larger than 5,000 sq ft.; some homes occupy more than one tax lot; some owners do not want to further develop their property. The Study Area would have 10,235 residents and 3,755 housing units approximately by the year 2010. Based on the number of additional homes and residents projected in this scenario, service demand would increase. Table 5 details those changes by examining each of the City's expected revenues, operating costs, and capital improvement costs associated with each City fund. Table 5 Projected Costs and Revenues by Fund for Bull Mountain Area, Moderate Growth (Scenario 3) Onzoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $2,974,309 $1,843,752 $1,130,557 State Gas Tax $424,978 $509,303 ($84,325) Sanitary Sewer $281,324 $114,005 $167,319 Storm Sewer $135,216 $104,134 $31,082 Water $2,354,165 $921,240 $1,432,925 One-time Capital Costs Fund Fund Balance/ Capital Improvements Balance Capital Revenues Traffic Impact Fee $2,739,120 $12,718,600 ($9,979,480) Parks SDC $1,987,680 $17,482,500 ($15,494,820 Water SDC $2,473,692 $816,400 $1,657,292 Based on the above table, the following is a summary of issues that need to be addressed in considering annexation of the Bull Mountain area: NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXA'T'ION STUDY PAGE 17 lALRFLMI3arbara\AA'NEXATION Final ReporAl 1 02 01 Drakdoc DRA 1 For Internal Ruview • with the exception of the State Gas Tax Fund, the operating costs are significantly less than the respective revenues for all funds; the significant need for road improvements and parks (Appendix B) would be the major consideration in the annexation of the Bull Mountain area; the projected park and transportation improvement (CYP) costs (Appendix B), exceed the projected revenue. Summary. The estimated need to provide as adequate level of service for parks and roads is the most critical aspect in evaluating the Bull Mountain area annexation in the Moderate Growth Scenario. Capital costs exceed projected revenues. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 1$ lALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final ReporAl 102 01 Draft.doc . . DRAFr For Internd Review 5. ANNEXA'T'ION AND 'T'AXA'T'ION In all scenarios, this report focuses on service provision and its costs. This section provides a comparison of the tax rates for the study area. The following is a brief summary of the Bull Mountain area taxation (see Appendix D) for details). • Property owners in the Bull Mountain area are grouped into two tax districts: 51.78 and 23.78. The City of Tigard tax district is 2374. • Bull Mountain property owners (tax districts 51.78 and 23.78) now pay the following taxes for general government services and would continue to pay them under annexation: Washington County, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, Port of Portland and Metro. • Bull Mountain property owners (tax districts 51.78 and 23.78) now pay the following taxes to support General Obligation bonds, and would continue to pay them under annexation: Washington County, Portland Community College, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, Port of Portland, Metro and Tri-Met. • Bull Mountain property owners (tax districts 51.78 and 23.78) would cease paying the following taxes for gener .i government services, as these services would be assumed by the City of Tigard: Washington County Enhanced Patrol, Washington County Road Maintenance, and Washington County Street Light Assessment. • A home with an assessed value of $227,755 would pay an additional $256.50 per year if annexed. Those taxes support the full government and operations of the City of Tigard, and the additional services provided to City versus County residents, as detailed in Table 2, in Section 2. It also includes one existing general obligation bond for the City of Tigard. The Federal government offers the Entitlement City Program to those cities with a population of at least 50,000. The program makes cities eligible for HUD grants. Under scenarios 2 and 3, the City's combined population is projected to be over 50,000. The City would become eligible for Entitlement City grants in the year it reaches 50,000 population, which is dependent upon the area's growth rate. NOVEMBER :2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 19 lALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXAT10N Final R.eportU 1 02 01 Draft.doc LAeA.C' .L For Int~~nal Review b. CONCLUSIONS AND KEY POLICY QUES'T'IONS Summary of Conclusions • With the exception of the East Subarea, the majority of the Bull Mountain area is built out. • Assuming buildout of approximately 12,905 residents and 4,824 housing units for the entire Study Area, each subarea could reach buildout at different times. • Annexation under scenarios 2 and 3 would make the City an Entitlement City in the future. Additional funding may become available to Tigard • Revenue projections are mostly dependent upon growth. The rate and amount of growth determines revenue forecasts. • The Study Area has extensive capital needs, mostly road and park, improvements. • Capital costs for road improvements and park improvements exceed revenue projections. Key Policy Based on the -above conclusions, the key policy issue is a capital improvement funding strategy. Possible strategies: • Use a portion of the General Fund to address capital improvements. • Assistance from Washington County to address some or all of the capital improvement needs. • Form Local Improvement Districts to address specific capital improvement needs, such as parks and roads. • Delay improvement of streets until funding sources are available. • Obtain grant fundings to address portions of capital improvements. • Identify the effective sequence of annexing specific sub-areas of Bull Mountain. Appendix E identifies the various methods of annexation available to the City of Tigard. NOVEMBER 2001 THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION STUDY PAGE 20 1ALRPLN\13arbara\ANNEXATION Final Repordl 102 01 Ihatt.doc Appendix A East Sub-Area Scenario 3 Ongoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $641,478 $286,864 $354,614 State Gas Tax $60,868 $59,265 $1,603 Sanitary Sewer $53,142 $16,328 $36,814 Storm Sewer $25,542 $14,915 $10,627 Water $337,180 $131,940 $205,240 une-time capital costs Fund Fund Balance/Capital Revenues Capital Improvements Balance Traffic Impact Fee $1,243,000 $2,500,000 ($1,257,000) Parks SDC $902,000 $2,497,500 ($1,595,500) Water SDC $1,122,550 $65,900 $1,056,650 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final Report\Appendix A.doc Page 12 Appendix A East Sub-Area Scenario 2 Ongoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $1,050,707 $418,523 $632,183 State Gas Tax $99,150 $85,137 $14,013 Sanitary Sewer $89,880 $26,598 $63,282 Storm Sewer $43,200 $24,296 $18,904 Water $549,240 $214,920 $334,3201 une-ume uapnai uosis Fund Fund Balance/Capital Revenues Capital Improvements Balance Traffic Impact Fee $2,350,400 $2,500,000 ($149,600) Parks SDC $1,705,600 $4,095,000 ($2,389,400) Water SDC $2,122,640 $65,900 $2,056,740 I:\LRPLN\BarbaralANNEXATION Final ReportWppendix A.doc Page 11 Appendix A East Sub-Area Scenario 1 Ongoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $231,537 $102,946 $128,591 State Gas Tax $22,587 $29,993 ($7,406) Sanitary Sewer $16,403 $6,059 $10,344 Storm Sewer $7,884 $5,534 $2,350 Water $125,120 $48,960 $76,160 One-time L;apitai costs Fund Fund Balance/Capital I Capital Improvements L Balance Revenues - Traffic Impact Fee $133,340 $0 $133,340 Parks SDC $96,760 $855,000 ($758,240) Water SDC $120,419 $0 $120,419 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final Report\Appendix A.doc . Page 10 Appendix A North Sub-Area Scenario 3 Ongoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $828,156 $621,312 $206,844 State Gas Tax $143,742 $165,637 ($21,895) Sanitary Sewer $88,794 $38,561 $50,233 Storm Sewer $42,678 $35,224 $7,454 Water $796,260 $311,580 $484,680 cane-time uapitai costs Fund Fund Balance/Capital Capital Improvements Balance Revenues Traffic Impact Fee $537,880 $2,846,600 ($2,308,720) Parks SDC $390,320 $5,917,500 ($5,527,180) Water SDC $485,758 $189,200 $296,558 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final Report\Appendix A.doc Page 9 Appendix A North Sub-Area Scenario 2 Onaoina Operatina Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $936,587 $699,038 $237,550 State Gas Tax $165,167 $188,222 ($23,055) Sanitary Sewer $101,639 $44,308 $57,331 Storm Sewer $48,852 $40,474 $8,378 Water $914,940 $358,020 $556,920 cane-time capitai costs Fund Fund Balance/Capital Capital Improvements Balance Revenues Traffic Impact Fee $924,340 $2,846,600 ($1,922,260) Parks SDC $670,760 $6,795,000 ($6,124,240) Water SDC $834,769 $189,200 $645,569 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final Report\Appendix A.doc Page 8 Appendix A North Sub-Area Scenario 1 Ongoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $722,853 $516,800 $206,053 State Gas Tax $124,602 $144,651 ($20,049) Sanitary Sewer $75,949 $33,426 $42,523 Storm Sewer $36,504 $30,533 $5,971 Water $690,230 $270,099 $420,131 vne-time capitai c;osts Fund Fund Balance/Capital Revenues Capital Improvements Balance Traffic Impact Fee $149,160 $0 $149,160 Parks SDC $108,240 $5,175,000 ($5,066,760) Water SDC $134,706 $0 $134,706 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATiON Final Report\Appendix A.doc Page 7 Appendix A South Stub-Area Scenario 3 Ongoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $1,057,617 $673,712 $383,905 State Gas Tax $159,624 $207,997 ($48,373) Sanitary Sewer $101,639 $42,821 $58,818 Storm Sewer $48,852 $39,110 $9,742 Water $884,235 $346,050 $538,185 vne-ume c;aDnai costs Fund Fund Balance/Capital Revenues Capital Improvements Balance Traffic Impact ee $567,260 $5,444,000 ($4,876,740) Parks SDC $411,640 $6,570,000 ($6,158,360) Water SDC $512,291 $365,600 $146,691 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final Report\Appendix A.doc Page 6 Appendix A South Sub-Area Scenario 2 Ongoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating) Cost Balance General $1,244,099 $778,549 $465,549 State Gas Tax $189,207 $256,469 ($67,262) Sanitary Sewer $119,091 $50,757 $68,334 Storm Sewer $57,240 $46,365 $10,875 Water $1,048,110 $410,130 $637,980 vne-ume capitai costs Fund Traffic Impact Fee Parks SDC Water SDC Fund Balance/Capital I Capital Improvements Revenues $1,093,840 $5,444,06-0- $793,760 $7,768,000 $987,844 $365,600 Balance ($4,350,160) ($6,974,240) $622,244 :\LRPLN1Barbara\ANNEXATION Final Report\Appendix A.doc Page 5 Appendix A South Sub-Area Scenario I Ongoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $887,928 $541,657 $346,271 State Gas Tax $132,698 $164,764 ($32,066) Sanitary Sewer $85,761 $35,598 $50,163 Storm Sewer $41,220 $32,517 $8,703 Water $735,080 $287,640 $447,440 One-time Capital costs Fund Fund Balance/Capital Capital Improvements Balance Revenues Traffic Impact Fee $88,140 $0 $88,140 Parks SDC $63,960 $5,400,000 ($5,336,040) Water SDC $79,599 $0 $79,599 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final ReportlAppendix A.doc Payee 4 Appendix A West Sub-Area Scenario 3 Ongoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $447,059 $261,864 $185,194 State Gas Tax $60,744 $76,404 ($15,660) Sanitary Sewer $37,750 $16,295 $21,455 Storm Sewer $18,144 $14,885 $3,259 Water $336,490 $131,670 $204,820 tine-time caDitai costs Fund Fund Balance/Capital Capital Improvements Balance Revenues Traffic Impact Fee $390,980 $1,928,000 ($1,537,020) Parks SDC $283,720 $2,497,500 ($2,213,780) Water SDC $353,093 $195,700 $157,393 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEYATION Final ReporhAppendix Adoc Page 3 Appendix A West Sub-Area Scenario 2 Ongoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $574,613 $364,571 $210,042 State Gas Tax $82,293 $98,183 ($15,890) Sanitary Sewer $50,707 $22,076 $28,631 Storm Sewer $24,372 $20,165 $4,207 Water . $455,860 $178,380 $277,480 Une-time caaital costs Fund Fund Balance/Capital Revenues Capital Improvements Balance Traffic Impact Fee $781,960 $1,928,000 ($1,146,040) Parks SDC $567,440 $3,375,000 ($2,807,560) Water SDC $706,186 $195,700 $510,486 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final Report\Appendix A.doc Page 2 Appendix A West Sub-Area Scenario I Ongoing Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $319,504 137,066 $182,439 State Gas Tax $39,195 52,524 ($13,329) Sanitary Sewer $24,792 10,514 $14,278 Storm Sewer $11,916 9,604 $2,312 Water $217,120 84,960 $132,160 vne-time uapiiao uosis Fund Traffic Impact Fee Parks SDC Water SDC Fund Balance/Capital I Capital Improvements Revenues $0 . $0 $0 $1,675,000 $0 $0 Balance $0 ($1,675,000) $0 is\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final Report\Appendix A.doc Page 1 Appendix B Assumptions Streetlight Operating Costs $7 per light per month for streetlights in local streets $10 per light per month for streetlights in major collectors Road Maintenance Assumptions Frequency of Maintenance Scenario I North Cycle every 5 years West 6 South 6 East 6 Scenario 2 North Cycle every 4 years West 4 South 4 East 4 Scenario 3 North Cycle every 4.5 years West 5 South 5 East 5 Source of information: City of Tigard Engineering Department IAL.RPLMBarbarMANNEXATION Final-Report\Appendix B.doc Appendix B CIP Assumptions: Assumptions are that Bull Mountain Road, Beef Bend Road, 150th Avenue, Menlor Street and Sunrise Lane will have to be reconstructed and widened to collector standards. These improvements will be sometime in the next 20 years and are included in Scenarios 2 and 3, but not Scenario 1. By Area: North Menlor Street - From existing pavement across ravine to Scholls Meadow #2 (2,500') Sunrise Lane - North to existing paved area (1000') 1501h Avenue -Bull Mountain Road to Sunrise Lane (1,150') West Bull Mountain Road -Beef Bend Road to 150th Avenue (3,450 South Beef Bend Road - 131St Avenue to 150th Avenue (5,085') Bull Mountain Road -150th Avenue to 133`d Avenue (4,122') 150 Avenue - Bull Mountain Road to Beef Bend Road (5,950') Source of information: City of Tigard Engineering Department IALRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final ReportWppendix B.doc W x .,-I c a~ a a Ott C6 C%j ° ' - O _ _ aa c O r FQ 0 O CA V) N CA O O r N d9 69 Q O O M O O O O ~ r O 0 D !j] co Ooi W- cD cA v> EF? = N O O O CD Nr ca O O N O N N ~ C4 6R 6f9 O O O O O to N O 3 O r- N M r C7 CA ~ _ N O O O O O O O 0 Z Ld O (6 td ~ 1a- °o F i~ x # Z ti i- 10 i O O ~0 In O w W 2 0'~p o p V w 1 eo Z 0 11J ! w Q Lu 44 U ~ „ U yUT ~ WCO<1 W v v~ a 404_ . in a.2 1 1 « JJ C N 14 QJ a Q V1 1-~ O 3 U r-1 .0 a O -4 41 to E 1a O W ~i r-1 w O U 1a a O cn co O O O N Co O O v_ C4 M M O M O N O M Q ~ 0 N O CD O CD. O (0 (0 OV O O Co O L G O O O M co ~ Q O O c O OOD 0004 ) 7 O ( M O r M 0 a 649 a N ate- O O O O O O LO In N O pj ti ( O N GR U) W N O O O O O C) (co r co 0 to O p; N i _ (.q 0 z (O. Y a- o w R 0d « o 0 0^-R a 00 ^ c 40 _3 z LLl v WF- ~M W e: W M 93 In Q AQ~ 02~ O O 0 0 x cQ R 0 N a J Fa- F- N ~I Z H 3 uI 0 V V) ao 0 C) C> ° o _ oo o _ v tD ~ G N M th EA 0 . = O 0 ~ « r to O tp t( (O t M lT to 6 9 r ~ FA C) C) O O co N O O tD r tD O r ~ tR 64 64 O O O r r U) O co to co to C) ea r t1). b4 M O O rn N E O O r Go O M ~ 69 0 N M O co r- O c'o O r O C' J Q C Z V ° W V- - X p g a (2' X A Ci~O G J O )mU~ > W O ~is 0) !eW--M c O V A- W ~ O O O O _O X co m U to l0 0 N Appendix G Total All Areas General Fund Costs Fund Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Revenue $2,161,822 $3,806,006 $2,974,309 Operating Cost $1,298,469 $2,260,681 $1,843,752 Balance $1,545, $1,130, One-time Co Fund Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Costs Fund Balance/ Capital Revenues $863,353 $1,545,325 $1,130,557 Capital Improvements $0 $267,200 $267,200 Balance $863,3531 $1,278,125 IALRPLN1Barbara\ANNEXATION !Final ReportWppendix C.doc Page 1 Appesndik C Total All Areas State Gas Tax Fund Onzoinz Oneratinz Costs Fund Revenue Operating Balance Cost Scenario 1 $319,081 $391,932 ($72,851) Scenario 2 $535,816 $628,011 ($92,195) Scenario 3 $424,978 $509,303 ($84,325) One-time Cavital Costs Fund I Fund Balance/ I Capital Balance Capital Revenues Improvements Scenario 1 ($72,851) $0 ($72,851) Scenario 2 ($92,195) $252,500 ($344,695) Scenario 3 ($84,325) $333,900 ($418,225) 1 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final ReporhAppendix C.doc Page 2 Appendix C . Total All Areas Sanitary Sewer Fund Ongoing Oueratine Costs Fund Revenue Operating Balance Cost Scenario 1 $202,904 $85,597 $117,307 Scenario 2 $361,318 $143,739 $217,579 Scenario 3 $281,324 $114,005 $167,319 One-time Capital Costs Fund Fund Balance/ Capital Balance J Capital Revenues Improvements Scenario 1 $394,830 $0 $394,830 Scenario 2 $5,486,693 $1,510,100 $3,976,593 Scenario 3 $2,917,890 $1,510,100 $1,407,790 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final ReporhAppendix C.doc Page 3 Appendix C Total All Areas Storm Sewer Fund Onwiniz Ooeratin2 Costs Fund Revenue Operating Balance Cost Scenario 1 $97,524 $78,188 $19,336 Scenario 2 $173,664 $131,300 $42,364 Scenario 3 $135,216 $104,134 $31,082 Cane-time Caoital Costs Fund Fund Balance/ Capital Balance Capital Revenues Improvements Scenario 1 $82,000 $0 $82,000 Scenario 2 $1,139,500 $0 $1,139,500 Scenario 3 $606,000 $0 $606,000 IALRPLN1Barbara\ANNEXATION Final ReporhAppendix C.doc Page 4 Appendix C Total All Areas Water Fund H a N Costs Fund Revenue 1 $1,767,550 2 $2,968,150 3 $2,354,165 Cane-time Co Fund Costs Fund Balance/ anital Revenues Scenario 2 Scenario 3 $1,806,700 $1,432,925 lALRPLN1Barbara\ANNEXATI0N Final Report\Appendix C.dec Operating Cost $1,161,450 $921,240 Capital improvements $542,094 $429,996 Balance $1,806,700 $1,432,925 Balance $753,037 $1,264,606 $1,002,929 Page 5 Appendix C 'T'otal All Areas 'T'raffic Impact Fee Fund One-time Capital Costs Fund I Fund Balance/ I Capital I Balance Capital Revenues Improvements Scenario 2 $5,150,540 $12,718,600 ($7,568,060) Scenario 3 $2,739,120 $12,718,600 ($9,979,480) IALRPLN\BarbaralANNEXATION Final ReporhAppendix C.doc page 6 Appendix C Total All Areas Parks SDC Fund One-time Cavital Costs Fund Fund Balance/ Capital Balance Capital Revenues Improvements Scenario 1 $268,960 $13,105,000 ($12,836,040) Scenario 2 $3,737,560 $22,033,000 ($18,295,440) Scenario 3 $1,987,680 $17,482,500 ($15,494,820) lALRPLN1BarbaraXANNEXATI0N Final Report\Appendix C.doc Page 7 Appendix C Total All Areas Water SDC Fund One-time Canital Costs Fund Fund Balance/ Capital Balance Capital Revenues Improvements Scenario 1 $334,724 $0 $334,724 Scenario 2 $4,651,439 $816,400 $3,835,039 Scenario 3 $2,473,692 $816,400 $1,657,292 I:\LRPLN\Barbara\ANNEXATION Final ReporhAppendix C.doc Page 8 O x C C CL CL Q N ~ O a ~ K G O W 8 F 88 8 8 N 9 C., 18 8 8 8 ~ 8 $ $ 8 E8 p p p pp p NNNNM o o po q p1 ~ 1~1YY p p p y~N yeti y~M 1fI C'IN N p p p p p p ~ Q p p _"NNMNMNMNK M YM1 N ~i vv c~ BpQY, 8p O p O$$ 8p 8p N , O$ i n O O N 8p~pSpSalp 111H O O O O O N G 10 L R 00000 - - COON -O ~6 V 00000000 yl 3 a m s Eq N pp O'f $ m ftpDVp O 001, C9 Q~1. 8 BONi. $S WO N N UN Nt? N~$~O ^OI^~,NO O NNMNNYfNw c W „ O d m G ^ N W W N N ~ t m O. ~ m ~~Cppl ~(fD~p o~ 0 ~ n OO O 0 H r 66 0 0 10 b A O$ N 0! N 0 0 O0 0 1 f 1 ` tD f 0, { t O, l 0 0 0-00000" ^ 'S ~ N A ~ C p G Hb W m 8p8p88 8 $$80$o~8Wi 6 6 0 N p8o$ppSoBp$p$pp8$8p~81pp NNw 1 O m o p NNNHM 0 11 tiMMl N N M N N NNNNNNw N N g 5 N H }QQ}{{ QXQ~j s 0 8p 88pp ~SS~ff 8p ~1♦p0 N 0 0 0 10 fi ~ N 8O 8p Sp pp 8p 88 O$ O O O~ O O O O N C C O O o O • G O C N O O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G E~ a t L ~ eO~" oK°~ n~, 8 A! ~8$ ~ 8 8 o m• n~ , ~ 8~ ~ go~ ~ ~ $ 3 0+ N N pp ((yy VN~NNNN~ p pm Jp pp~ NNNNN°~ ♦ NN N O ~ ( M w N N N N N 41 10 ~ n o 8p N N Q~j♦yO 0 ~ 0 0 0 ^ -nw 8 8p (ny pQQ tp Q~RM UO G N O C C ui C 0 1 0 0, T N 0 6 O H O 10 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 o d N -W O gGg ~ t m ~ C C pp O O 10 O ' f 001, C9 O^i C^'), NN$$ $f0 N 1100 pp pp~~ W pp 10$Or~', ~ N 1.7 m gi pNC ~ _ryry 0 L ppp~ tY ppp ~ N N~ ~ M N N p N N w 1p ( pp N N h M N N N N O O N O Q N N N N HN m 2 n 5 8 ~ N ~ 0 ~p GpO 8p ~ 0 W CpO ~ppp ty¢p~~ F' ~ O t0 O 0` ~ N ~ O ~ O 0 o C m a /0 00 b 1~ O IA N G N OO G to OO O l OO BOO COOO N N fs~ v cO O G c O m E 0 C ~s 0~ m r k s .2 a o E C LL G G N EE p~t QE _ ~ G G O ~ ~ g m m E g . 0 ~ IO rp O S m9NpS cS~ r g > jigs ~~~aF $ $~58~~ D ~ t ~1 S m ~ E G ~~t- r ~ 3 ~ c {ap ~y11 ye .o g H E 1.1 O O Z' a~a Hwa mu°i racZ 333~ - , ~ mra a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 42 .2 Appendix E METHODS OF ANNEXATION PROVIDED BY ORS CHAPTER 222 Method: Prior Election Election consent requirement within requirement required? City? within territory to be annexed? City Initiated - By the legislative body of the City, on its NO NO (City charter does YES own motion [ORS 222.111(2)] (requires public hearing not require, but and Ordinance which will set election and effective date Council can send to upon passage) election if desired) Subject to referendum Owner Initiated - By petition to the legislative body of YES NO (City charter does YES (if prior the city by owners of real property in the territory to be not require, but consent of annexed. [ORS 222.111(2)] (requires public hearing and Council can send to electors and land Ordinance which will declare the territory annexed upon election if desired) owners is not condition that a majority of votes cast in the territory provided, as being annexed favor annexation or as described in a, b Subject to referendum described in or c below) subsection a, b or c below, prior to action) a. 100% Owner and Majority of Electors - by YES NO NO written consent to annexation by all the owners of land and not less than 50% of the electors, if Subject to referendum any, in the territory [ORS 222.125] b. Triple Majority - by written consent to annex YES NO NO of more than half of the owners of land in the territory who also own more than half of the land Subject to referendum in the territory and of real property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real property in the territory [ORS 222.1701 (Triple majority discouraged beccuse it may not be constitutional) c. Double Majority - by written consent of a YES NO NO majority of the electors in the territory along with the written consent of property owners of more Subject to referendum than half the land area in the territory. [ORS 222.170(2)] Island annexation - When territory not within a city is NO NO (City charter does NO surrounded by the corporate boundaries of the city, or by not require, but the corporate boundaries of the city and the ocean shore Council can send to or a stream, bay, lake or other body of water, except election if desired) when the territory not within a city is surrounded entirely by water. [ORS 222.7501 Subject to referendum DRAFT For Internal Revlew Appendix F BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION QUESTION AND ANSWER PACKET DRAFT ANSWERS TO THE JULY 2001 FOCUS GROUP QUESTIONS DRAFT For Internal Review BULL MOUNTAIN STUDY AREA: DRAFT ANSWERS TO THE FOCUS GROUP QUESTIONS A. WASHINGTON COUNTY 1. What is the County's long-term outlook on services to this area if Tigard does not annex Bull Mountain? (Answer provided by Washington County and the City of Tigard) Washington County has no plans to change existing levels of County service to the area. If the annexation does not occur, service delivery would continue as it is. The County would continue to provide a basic level of service as it does countywide. Municipal-type services would be provided on a fee-for-service basis (building permits, street lighting, etc.) or through special service districts (Urban Road Maintenance District, Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District, a possible future Park and Recreation District if voters set one up, etc.). The City of Tigard is continuing to provide some services such as planning, engineering, and building services in accordance with an intergovernmental agreement between Washington County and the City. This agreement is in effect for 5 years from the date it was executed (May, 1997) and may be renewed for an additional 5 years by mutual agreement. In addition, the agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement or by either party between the months of March 1 and July 1 of any year with 90 days written notice. 2. What are the County's current responsibilities to Bull Mountain residents? What is the vision of the County (i.e., what the County sees as its main roles in the future, as it applies to its entire area of governance)? (Answer provided by Washington County and the City of Tigard) Washington County has indicated that it sees itself both as a provider and as a convener (one who convenes or brings together partners in a given situation) of services. The County covers 727 square miles, 85% of which is rural. The population is over 450,000 residents; 90% of them live within the Urban Growth Boundary (half in their 12 cities, half in the urban unincorporated areas). Services the County provides to everyone include public safety (the Sheriff's Department, the jail, parole and probation, Community Corrections, the court system, district attorneys, victims' services, etc.), the county-wide road system (including maintenance and new capital construction), Juvenile Services, Housing Services, Health and Human Services (health clinics, child and family welfare, public health, restaurant inspections, solid waste and recycling), Assessment and Taxation, marriage licenses, passports, animal shelter and adoption services, funding support for the county's 12 libraries (city-supported and otherwise. For example, Tigard receives 62% of its overall operating funds for the Tigard Library which serves a population of 53,519), Aging and Veterans Services, Consolidated Emergency Management and support for Citizen Participation Organizations. Washington County does all this with the second leanest per capita staff of any County in the State of Oregon. According to Washington County, it cannot meet many more needs with current resources. Thus, the County strives for efciencies in government, and also engage in broad Page 2 DRAFT For Internal Review partnerships with the private and non-profit sectors. Currently, Washington County is engaged in a broad outreach effort called Vision West, which is bringing together the best minds in the County in areas ranging from education to health care, transportation, safety and the environment. Their on-going charge is to make sure public and private agencies converse and collaborate to improve the communities' future. The specific services the County provides include: Roads - as part of the Urban Road Maintenance District (URMD), Bull Mountain property owners pay for and receive both County and URMD levels of maintenance to County and public roads in the area. County policy allocates available road maintenance funding with priority given to the major system (arterials and major collectors) throughout the County. Neighborhood roads (minor collectors and local streets) are the lowest priority, and as a result, have deteriorated relative to the major system over the years. The URMD is a special district that does provide road-related maintenance and repair on these minor collector, local and public roads in the urban unincorporated areas of Washington County. It provides a paved surface to fair or better conditions. The URMD also provides $100,000 per year for the Neighborhood Streets Program. • Law enforcement - Bull Mountain is part of the Enhanced Sheriff s Patrol District; thus its property owners pay for and receive both County and ESPD levels of law enforcement service. The County service level is .5 officers per 1000 and the ESPD provides an additional .5 officers per 1000 residents for a total of 1 per 1,000 residents. Building services and Planning - the County currently has an intergovernmental agreement with the City of Tigard, under which the City provides land development and building services to residents of Bull Mountain directly, saving them the trip to Hillsboro. The County adopted the City's Development Code for this area. This agreement is in effect for 5 years from the date it was executed (May, 1997) and may be renewed for an additional 5 years by mutual agreement. In addition, the agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement or by either party between the months of March 1 and July 1 of any year with 90 - days written notice. Street lighting - not required, but usually built in by developers with payment organized under a Service District for Lighting. This annual fee is included on a property owner's property tax assessment. Assessment varies from $32 to $37 per year, on average. The assessment amount is determined by three factors: 1) the number of property owners in each district, 2) the number of lights in the district, and 3) the type of lights. The assessment covers the operation of the lights, and is provided by the County through a contract with PGE. PGE owns the lights and will continue to own them upon annexation. • Library services - supported through the Washington County Cooperative Library Services (WCCLS) consortium. This is funded partially by County tax. The City of Tigard receives 62% of its overall operating funds for the Tigard Library from the WCCLS. Funding levels are determined by circulation, open hours, collection expenditures, etc. Page 3 DRAFT For Internal Review • Park services - none. • Fire protection - Bull Mountain residents receive fire protection directly from Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, to whom they pay a separate tax or assessment as part of their property taxes. • Community organizations - the County provides basic support for the Citizen Participation Organizations. CPO 4B has represented Bull Mountain over the years; however, it is presently inactive. • Code Compliance - compliance with standards found in the City of Tigard Development Code are enforced by the City of Tigard Code Compliance Officer as part of the intergovernmental agreement between the City of Tigard and Washington County. The County continues to regulate standards that are not covered in the City's Development Code including: solid waste, animal control, noxious vegetation, junk/cars and noise. (To see the difference between the County level of service and the level of service the City will provide if annexed, see table 3 in this document.) 3. Why did the County decide to be a County and not an urban/rural County that provides City services? How was the County 2000 vision created? (Answer provided by Washington County and City of Tigard) With approximately 200,000 County residents now living in urban unincorporated neighborhoods (outside cities), the demand on the County for neighborhood services has been steadily increasing. Planning for growth at the neighborhood level, traffic management, enhanced police patrol, local street maintenance and zoning enforcement are a few examples. These are the types of services that a city normally provides. Related to this is the issue of equity. City property owners pay City taxes to receive these local services, as well as County taxes for countywide programs. For years, County taxes paid by City property owners subsidized a portion of local services the County provided to urban unincorporated neighborhoods. The subsidy issue was raised by Cities and this was corrected in 1986 when the Board of County Commissioners adopted County 2000, a long-term financial plan. Recognizing its fmancial limitations and the underlying theme that the County cannot be all things to all citizens, County 2000 makes a distinction regarding the financing of traditional services that are of countywide benefit versus municipal-type services that benefit specific geographic areas. Updated in 1994, County 2000 focuses general purpose tax dollars on services that benefit residents countywide, regardless of whether they live inside or outside cities or in the rural area. The current County 2000 plan is the result of a comprehensive public review process during which the County gathered extensive public feedback,'suggestions and evaluations. Every Board since 1986, including the current one, has maintained a policy that cities will eventually provide neighborhood services to the entire urban unincorporated area, sometimes Page 4 DRAFT For Internal Review in partnership with special districts like Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. The County has maintained a position of "aggressive neutrality" with regard to annexation, with practicality and resident interest driving the timeline. However, lack of annexation may significantly impact the infrastructure of affected communities, potentially resulting in a lesser quality of life. For this reason the County is also working closely with Metro, the cities and special districts in setting Urban Services boundaries, preparing for future annexations (Senate Bill 122). In 1997, the County entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the City of Tigard, turning over certain urban services including land development, building permits and some local road maintenance for the Bull Mountain area to the City. This agreement is in effect for 5 years from the date it was executed (May, 1997) and may be renewed for an additional 5 years by mutual agreement. In addition, the agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement or by either party between the months of March 1 and July 1 of any year with 90 days written notice. 4. Explain how Senate Bill (SB) 122 relates to the annexation process. (Answer provided by Washington County and City of Tigard) In 1993 the state legislature passed Senate Bill 122, which requires the coordination and provision of urban services for lands within the urban growth boundary. It requires the collaboration of counties, cities and special districts to determine which jurisdiction will be responsible for the long-term provision of urban services (such as sanitary sewers, water, fire protection, parks, open space, recreation, streets/roads, and mass transit) to residents of unincorporated. areas. The County, the CPOs and SB 122 Citizen Involvement Advisory Committees have been working with the cities of Beaverton, Tigard and Hillsboro for the past few years helping settle urban services boundary lines. The City of Tigard and Washington County have had an Urban Services Agreement in effect since 1997 that transfers land development and building permit responsibility to the City of Tigard. This agreement is in effect for 5 years from the date it was executed (May, 1997) and may be renewed for an additional 5 years by mutual agreement. In addition, the agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement or by either party between the months of March 1 and July 1 of any year with 90 days written notice. 5. Who should residents talk to at the County about annexation and County service issues? (Answer provided by Washington County) If it is a question of policy, the appropriate contact is their County Commissioner Roy Rogers or County Chairman Tom Brian. Staff points of contact are Walt Peck, County Communications Officer, 593-846-2013, or Anne Madden, Sr. Program Educator, Department of Land Use and Transportation, 503-846-4963. 6. If there is no parks department at the County, how does the County deal with park issues? (Answer provided by Washington County) The County parks effort is focused on Hagg Lake and Metzger Park. Hagg Lake is supported entirely by user fees and Metzger Park is supported 2/3 through a Local Improvement Page 5 DRAFT For Internal Review District (LID) and 1/3 through user fees collected from the rental of Metzger Hall. The County owns other properties that are designated as parks but are not developed. The only park land that has been purchased in the Bull Mountain area, is a portion of the Cache Creek site, however, there are no plans at this time for the County or City to develop it. Otherwise, all other park services in the County are provided by local park providers such as Tigard, THPRD, and Hillsboro. The remaining unincorporated areas receive no park services if they are not in the THPRD territory. Individuals living outside the THPRD district can pay a non- resident price to use THPRD facilities. 7. What is the Washington County permanent tax rate? (Answer provided by Washington County) The County rate is $2.2484 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. It should be noted, however, that the permanent rate does not include special district assessments such as the URMD or ESPD. For a complete breakdown of assessments paid on property taxes, refer to Table 6 at the back of this document. 8. How much money is now available for infrastructure under Washington County? (Answer provided by Washington County) The County does not have a dedicated amount of resources available for infrastructure improvements. Most large projects (such as the new jail) are funded through voter-approved bond measures. Other projects, such as transportation improvements, are funded through the discretionary distribution of property tax resources. For sewer related capital improvement projects, Clean Water Services updates a five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) annually during the budget process. From this document, an annual construction program is developed and included in the annual budget. The Sanitary Sewer Construction Fund in the current FY 2002 budget includes more than $52 million. Proposed treatment facility projects account for $24 million; collection capital projects, $23 million; and plari-ing and support projects, nearly $5 million. However, the CIP generally supports the major sewer projects; a transportation analogy might be the funding of the State or County road system. As with improvements to the local street system, the local sanitary sewer system is generally funded by the adjacent (or directly benefited) property owners. As a result, most of the local sewer system is funded by development or through local improvement districts (LIDS). The District's Board recently adopted a revised LID ordinance that does provide financial incentives, under certain conditions, for the sanitary sewer projects. Page 6 DRAFT For Internal Review 9. What local service levies (i.e., Washington County Enhanced Patrol) or LIDs do Bull Mountain residents pay for in addition to the current County tax rate? (Answer provided by Washington County) • The Urban Road Maintenance District (URMD); the URMD tax rate is $.25 per thousand assessed valuation. County policy allocates available road maintenance funding with priority given to the major system (arterials and major collectors). Neighborhood roads (minor collectors and local streets) are the lowest priority, and as a result had deteriorated relative to the major system over the years. The URMD is a special district that does provide road-related maintenance on these minor collector, local and public roads in the urban unincorporated areas of Washington County. District revenue is from a property tax that residents voted to assess themselves in 1994 and is unique to Washington County (as far as we know). Since formation of the URMD, neighborhood roads have improved. In 1997, Ballot Measure 50 passed, which made the URMD permanent. • Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District (ESPD); the ESPD tax rate is $1.0534 per $1,000 assessed valuation The ESPD program began in 1988 and provides (approximately) an additional .5 officers per 1,000 residents. This is in addition to the County-wide provision of .5 officers per 1,000 residents. • Service District for Lighting (SDL) Property owners of urban unincorporated areas pay for their street lighting services (if they have street lights) through the SDL. The average charge is somewhere between $32 and $37 per year per property owner. The assessment amount is determined by three factors: 1) the number of property owners in each district, 2) the number of lights in the district, and 3) the type of lights. The assessment covers the operation of the lights, and it is provided by the County through a contract with PGE. (Source: Washington County) B. SEWER/WATE _STREETS 1. Will residents be forced to hook up to sewer or City water? If so, how much will it cost per household? If not, how can residents get access to City sewer or water, and how much will it cost to do so? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) Once sanitary sewer is available in proximity to a property, the property owner has the option to connect after paying the appropriate fees. There is no fee to be paid until property owners choose to connect to the sewer, and there is no obligation to connect to the sewer if property owners continue to use an existing septic system as it is now being used. Property owners may, however, be required to connect to sewer if there is a sewer reimbursement district and Page 7 DRAFT For Internal Review they do work that requires a building or land use permit. For residential developments, any building permit for a new building or for an addition, modification, repair or alteration exceeding 25% of the value.of the building will trigger the need to connect to sewer. They would also be required to connect to sewer if their septic system fails. If the City chose to provide sewer service to fully developed subdivisions on septic, it would most likely be accomplished through a reimbursement district under the existing City program. The City would not be likely to propose a project unless there was an expectation that one-half of the owners would connect within three years. The City engineering staff estimated the cost of providing sewer service based on an existing subdivision in the Bull Mountain area. Based on this scenario, it is estimated that the cost would be approximately $6,000 per household. Under current policy, property owners must connect to the sewer within three years from the time sewer becomes available to take advantage of any benefits of the Incentive Program. However, if a property owner is able to wait fifteen years after the district formation date to connect, there is no reimbursement fee (except for the connection fee that is currently $2,335 which all property owners have to pay regardless of when they connect. This fee may increase over time). In addition, the property owner is responsible for the cost to bring the sewer line from the main line to the residence. Existing property owners on wells would not be required to connect to municipal water. For new developments, or in instances where property owners wish to connect to water, the property owner or developer would be required to pay for a water meter (price depends on the size of the meter required/needed) and, if needed, extension of the water main across the frontage of the property. Construction of a new well or to replace an existing well is determined on a case by case basis depending on many factors. For information on well placement or construction, contact the State Water Resources Department at 503-378-3739. 2. Are any street improvements planned? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) The City of Tigard, in cooperation with Washington County has scheduled to make minor improvements to the Bull Mountain/Roshak Road intersection. Bull Mountain Road, Beef Bend Road, 1501h Avenue, Menlor Street and Sunrise Lane have been identified as needing improvements (widening, resurfacing, etc.) to be brought up to collector standards in the future (within the next 20 years), however, they have not been incorporated into the City's or County's Capital Improvement Plan. C. DEVELOPMENT TRENDS 1. Will development trends on Bull Mountain change if annexed? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) The County developed its comprehensive plan for Bull Mountain in 1983. It established development standards which guided development. Tigard and Washington County have an Urban Planning Agreement that has been in effect since 1997, which gives Tigard the authority to review and approve land use applications, building permits and engineering permits. The area has been reviewed under the City's regulations since that time, while maintaining consistency with the County Comprehensive Plan standards for the area. When Page 8 DRAFT For Internal Review the Urban Planning Agreement was developed, findings were made that indicate that "the City has functionally equivalent plan and zoning designations ...because of the historic coordination between the County and the City." It is not anticipated, therefore, that there will be any change in the current development patterns as a result of an annexation. Should a property owner seek a change of land use designation to develop property in a way not allowed under the present zoning, the application would be reviewed and decided by the Tigard City Council in accordance with the City's standards. 2. Will the residents have a say in the vision for the Bull Mountain area? Will they get to decide how Bull Mountain should look? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) Yes, residents will have a say in the vision for the Bull Mountain area. Residents will have a say in who their representatives are by participating in the election process. If the Bull Mountain area is annexed into the City of Tigard, residents would have an opportunity to participate in any public process that would change plans for the area. However, the current zoning and development code standards will continue to apply and there are no plans for changes in the near future. If standards or zoning were desired to be changed at some later date, there would be notification to all affected property owners within 500 feet of a subject site and opportunities for public involvement at public hearings prior to any changes taking effect. 3. Will they be forced to accept a more citified look, such as sidewalks and street lights? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) Existing developments would not be forced to "upgrade" to a more urban look. New developments, however, are required to provide infrastructure (streets, sidewalks, lights, street trees, etc.) improvements. In addition, there may be opportunity through the City's capital improvement program (CIP) process to make street improvements in areas needing them which would result in upgrades as well. The City's annual CIP formulation process provides opportunities for citizen input through a wide variety of means including Citizen Involvement Team meetings; internet email, written correspondence, Planning Commission public hearing, and City Council public hearing prior to adoption of the CIP projects for implementation. Major streets such as Bull Mountain Road and Beef Bend Road may be widened at some point in the future to provide additional capacity and to accommodate alternative modes of travel (additional lanes, sidewalk on both sides, and bike lanes). Potential funding sources could be the Washington County Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program, the Countywide Traffic Impact Fee, or a bond issue that requires voter approval. 4. Will adding Bull Mountain to the City of Tigard create a need for additional multi- family built-density areas on Bull Mountain or within the City of Tigard? (Metro 2040 Growth Plan) (Answer provided by City of Tigard) No. Both the City of Tigard and Washington County currently meet their target population goals by requiring development to build at no less than 80% of the maximum zoning allowed in that zone. The existing zoning, adopted by Washington County, in Bull Mountain will Page 9 DRAFT For Internal Review continue to apply and new developments will continue to be required to build to minimum densities. 5. Will zoning be changed because of annexation? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) No. The Urban Planning Agreement between the City and Washington County, and the City's development code, requires the City to apply the equivalent County zoning to land annexed into the City and not make any changes for at least one year. If, however, it is mutually agreed upon by both County and City Planning Directors at the time of annexation that the County designation is outdated, an amendment may be initiated before the 1 year period is over. There are no plans to change the zoning in this area. If zoning were desired to be changed at some later date, there would be notification to all affected property owners and opportunities for public involvement at public hearings prior to any changes taking effect. Notice would be provided to all property owners within 500 feet of a site specific land use proposal. In addition, public notice would be published in the local newspaper (usually in the Tigard Times). D. PARKS 1. Will annexation change the mindset of the City towards purchasing green space on Bull Mountain? Will Bull Mountain buy land for parks if annexed? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) Tigard has allocated Metro green spaces money to purchase land in the unincorporated area, but has not spent parks System Development Charges (SDC) generated by development in Tigard. The City's primary funding source for park improvements is the park SDC on new development. The park SDC is collected at the time a building permit is issued and is used solely for park acquisition or development. At present, the park SDC imposed on a single family house inside the City is $1,600. Because the City lacks jurisdiction and Washington County doesn't charge a park SDC, a single family house constructed in the Bull Mountain area contributes no fees for parks. Tigard is designated as the area's future park provider, but currently has no funding source to improve parkland conditions outside the unincorporated area in Bull Mountain. Annexation would allow the City to begin collecting the park SDC on new development within the annexed area. From June 1997, when the City first began providing services in the Bull Mountain area, to August 2001, the City issued permits for 776 permits for single family and 56 multi-family housing units inside the Urban Services Area (Bull Mountain). Based upon the current City fee structure, had the City had authority to collect park SDCs during this period, approximately $1.3 million in SDC revenues would have been collected and been available for park acquisition and development. Over the last 8 months (March to October 2001), 200 permits were issued with a potential $328,000 of parks SDC funds going uncollected. The longer the area waits to annex, the more funds are lost and the less vacant land is available to begin to meet the area's park needs. In addition, property values are continuing to rise, making land all the more difficult to obtain. The City's primary source of funding for park maintenance is the City General Fund. Property taxes paid by City property owners and businesses provide the revenue for the fund. The unincorporated area does not pay City property taxes. Page 10 DRAFT For Internal Review Bull Mountain annexation would not necessarily provide immediate revenue for parks. As new development occurs over time, park SDCs would be collected which could be used for park acquisition and improvements within the area. Revenues collected from property taxes would be used for the on-going maintenance of park facilities throughout the City. At the time of annexation, the beginning SDC and maintenance fund balances would be zero, unless the City Council chooses to provide start up funding from City resources (the General Fund). 2. What are the chances of Bull Mountain getting a park if it isn't annexed? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) County policy is that it does not provide park services within the area it governs and it does not charge a parks SDC. To date, the City Council has chosen not to invest limited City park dollars in providing park services in the unincorporated area. The City has applied some of its Metro greenspaces dollars to the Cache Creek property in the Bull Mountain area, as has Washington County. There are approximately 12 acres, but no development of the site using general fund dollars has been planned. Without additional funds, the City would not purchase additional park lands in the unincorporated area. 3. Will the study select locations for parks on Bull Mountain? What is the likelihood of a park located on the spine of Bull Mountain? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) No, the scope of the study does not include selecting parks. However, in 1999, Tigard adopted a park system master plan that covered both the incorporated and Urban Services Areas. The plan identified future park needs and priority improvements. In the Bull Mountain Area, it identified the need for three neighborhood parks and one community park. An exception is that the City and County jointly acquired a 12-acre site on Bull Mountain for a nature park. The park is not open to the public at this time because the City does not have funds for park improvements and maintenance outside the City. In general, buildable residentially zoned property is very expensive, particularly property with a view amenity, such as the spine of Bull Mountain. A portion of the powerline corridor is close to the Bull Mountain summit. The park master plan identifies the potential opportunity for a playfield and a regional pedestrian and bicycle trail within the powerline corridor, however there has been concern about developing within this corridor and no development would be planned until these concerns are addressed and development and maintenance funds secured. E. LAW ENFORCEMENT 1. How will La-,,v Enforcement service differ between County and City? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) The County currently provides .5 officers/ 1000 people county-wide and an additional .5 officers/1000 people in the ESPD (Enhanced Sheriff Patrol District); the City of Tigard provides 1.5 officers/1000 people. If the entire Bull Mountain area were annexed at its current population, the City would need 10 additional officers and 3 additional cars to serve Page 11 DRAFT For Internal Review this area at the City's current service level. The City's average response time for Priority 1 calls is 3.5 minutes, for Priority 2 calls the average response time is 3.5 minutes and for Priority 3 calls the average response time is 6.5 minutes. Priority 1 calls are defined as calls involving threat of physical injury to life or property, Priority 2 calls are urgent, but not life and death matters (still dispatched immediately), and Priority 3 calls are routine calls, which must be dispatched within 15 minutes. Tigard Police continues to work under a mutual aid agreement with other jurisdictions which allows for Tigard to provide officers in another jurisdiction with aid when necessary and vice versa, however, this is generally for large scale need situations. 2. How will the City provide service to the area, since annexing adds a lot more land and people to the police service district? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) The City's police department will respond to calls originating in the Bull Mountain area. The level of service will be provided at the City's standard ratio; see #1. If the entire Bull Mountain area is annexed, the City will most likely create a new patrol district for the area. The City police department has indicated that they would want to locate a kiosk in the Bull Mountain area, with the annexation. The Chief of Police envisions the kiosk to be a small substation which would be used by patrol to make telephone calls, write reports, meet people, make computer queries, receive and give out information and to create a high visibility of a police presence in the area. It would not be staffed full time and would be used daily on an as needed basis by the officers. In the future, when the level of activity warrants it, they would like to have it staffed part-time. 3. How will the proposed Washington County Police consolidation affect us: will it eliminate the benefit of annexing to the City in the Law Enforcement area? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) It is unknown at this time how such a consolidation would affect law enforcement services in Washington County, if it occurred. There are numerous questions about such a consolidation, which include cost, service levels, local control and local identity, that have not been addressed. At this point, there are more questions than answers. To date, the study of consolidation of police services in Washington County has been promoted by the Washington County Police Officer's Association and a private citizen. Cities and the County have not suggested consolidation. Page 12 DRAFT For Internal Review F. ANNEXATION PROCESS AND OPTIONS 1. What is the process of annexation, and who votes on it? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) The following table identifies the methods of annexation available: 'r. f,l t x,r1Q'runn4Z nta A ATM-P Y A TTnM PR OVTT)F.T) BY ORS CHAPTER 222 1_Uki 1 - 1~1L 111VLV V Method: - - - Prior consent Election Election required? requirement within requirement City? within territory to be annexed? City Initiated - By the legislative body of the City, on NO NO (City charter does YES its own motion (ORS 222.111(2)] (requires public not require, but hearing and Ordinance which will set election and Council can send to effective date upon passage) election if desired) Subject to referendum Owner Initiated - By petition to the legislative body of YES NO (City charter does YES (if prior the city by owners of real property in the territory to be not require, but consent of electors annexed. [ORS 222.111(2)] (requires public hearing Council can send to and land owners is and Ordinance which will declare the territory annexed election if desired) not provided, as upon condition that a majority of votes cast in the described in territory being annexed favor annexation or as Subject to referendum subsection a, b or c described in a, b or c below) below, prior to action) a..100% Owner and Maioritv of Electors - by YES NO NO written consent to annexation by all the owners of land and not less than 50% of the electors, if Subject to referendum any, in the territory [ORS 222.125] b. Triple Maiority - by written consent to YES NO NO annex of more than half of the owners of land in the territory who also own more than half of Subject to referendum the land in the territory and of real property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real property in the territory [ORS 222.170] (Triple majority discouraged because it may not be constitutional) c. Double Majority - by written consent of a YES NO NO majority of the electors in the territory along with the written consent of property owners of Subject to referendum more than half the land area in the territory. [ORS 222.170(2)] Island annexation - When territory not within a city is NO NO (City charter does NO surrounded by the corporate boundaries of the city, or not require, but by the corporate boundaries of the city and the ocean Council can send to shore or a stream, bay, lake or other body of water, election if desired) except when the territory not within a city is surrounded entirely b water. ORS 222.750 Subject to referendum Page 13 DRAFT For Internal Review 2. Can the City annex only part of Bull Mountain? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) Yes. A preliminary recommendation will be made by City Council on how best to approach a possible annexation. Among the options are full, partial, or no annexation. Whichever course is chosen will be further refined in an outreach plan if Council directs staff to pursue annexation. In addition, individual parcels meeting the established City standards (they must be adjacent to the City limits, they must be able to be accommodated by necessary services, etc. - see Comprehensive flan policy 10.1.2), may submit an annexation application at any time. 3. Can the area become its own city? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) ORS 221.020 and 221.031 allow for property owners to petition for incorporation of a city in an unincorporated area and sets forth the process. However, ORS 221.031 (4) states that when the area proposed to be incorporated lies within an urbanized area, the petition must be accompanied by a resolution approving the proposed incorporation by the city or cities whose proximity would otherwise prohibit incorporation. The City Council has not considered this issue. 4. Is there the possibility of any other city annexing the area? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) No. The Bull Mountain area is in the Tigard's Urban Services Area, which means that this area has been identified by Washington County and the City of Tigard as being part of the City of Tigard in the future. The area was identified in an Urban Planning Agreement between the City of Tigard and Washington County which was signed in 1988. Both jurisdictions have adopted this as an Area of Interest in their comprehensive plans. The area south of Beef Bend, however, is in King City or its Urban Services Area. G. RIGHTS AND LAWS 1. How will property owner rights, laws, processes of law, and mediation differ between the current County standards and City standards? (Answer provided by Cipy of Tigard) In general, land use regulations will be the same as now, since the City of Tigard administers land-use regulations in the area. Municipal code standards will replace County code requirements and enforcement will be ultimately in municipal court. While we can not provide an analysis of all issues in this document, below is a list of some common issues which explains the difference between the City standards and County standards: Page 14 DRAFT For Internal Review Table 2 - Comnarison of standards for Washineton Countv and Tieard Topic County standards in Bull Mountain area City standards in Bull Mountain area Noise No specific decibel level restrictions. Very Specific - decibel levels may not exceed Construction may not occur between 7pm 50db between the hours of lam and IOpm or and 7 am Monday-Saturday and not at all 40db between the hours of IOpm and lam. on Sundays or holidays. Between 7pm and Construction activity is prohibited between the 10pm no excessive people noises such as hours of 9pm and lam Monday through yelling, etc. After 1Opm enforcement is at Friday, 9pm-8am Saturday, 9pm-9am on the sheriff officer's discretion. Sunday. Tall grass and Complaint based- letter issued telling Complaint based- letter issued telling property weeds property owner to cut if nuisance exists owner to cut if nuisance exists Livestock Covered in City of Tigard Title 18 so there "When an agricultural use is adjacent to a is no difference between City and County residential use, no poultry or livestock, other since the intergovernmental agreement than normal household pets, may be housed or between Washington County and the City provided use of a fenced run within 100 feet of of Tigard was signed in May, 1997. any nearby residence except a dwelling on the same lot." TDC table 18.510.1, foot note 6. Abandoned/ On-street is enforced by Sheriff. On-street is enforced by the Police. inoperable Private property - can not have more than 5 Private property - can not have any in- Vehicles vehicles stored unless they are in a structure operable vehicles stored (other than in a or are driven in a 48 hour period. structure), however there is no limit on the number of vehicles stored as long as they are operable. Home Covered in City of Tigard Title 18 so there Anyone doing business out of the home must Occupations is no difference between City and since the have a home occupation permit: intergovernmental agreement between Type I - no employees or customers - cost is Washington County and the City of Tigard $175 in the URB ($30 in the City), good for was signed in May, 1997. (Properties in the duration of business City are charged a lesser fee at this time Type II - up to 1 employee or volunteer and 6 because the URB fees represent 100% cost customers per day. Notice to property owners recovery whereas the City fees are partially within 500 feet prior to decision. Cost is $883 subsidized by general fund dollars.) in the URB ($545 in the City), good for duration of business. The Washington County standards are very similar to the City's except it must be Note: additional regulations apply, sce 18.742. renewed annually, allows a few more customers (up to 10, versus 6 in the City), and does not have a limit on the hours of operation (so businesses such as bed and breakfasts were allowed in the County but no new ones will be allowed under current City standards). Business Tax None Required to be paid yearly for anyone engaging in any business within the City of Tigard. Tax is based on the number of employees and ranges between $55 per year for up to 10 employees to $220 per year for 51 or more employees. Accessory Covered in City of Tigard Title 18 so there Detached accessory structures may not exceed Structures is no difference between City and County 528 square feet on sites less than 2.5 acres or since the intergovernmenta * l agreement 1,000 square feet. on sites larger than 2.5 acres. between Washington County and the City May not exceed 15 feet in height, may not be of Tigard was signed in May, 1997. The located in the front yard setback. Side or rear Washington County standard however, is: and setbacks are 5 feet. Page 15 DRAFT For Internal Review Detached accessory structures may not exceed 600 square feet for lots up to 12,000 square feet, 5% of the total lot area for lots between 12,000 and 24,000 square feet and may not exceed 1,200 square feet for lots larger that 24,000 square feet. Special setbacks for structures for livestock or poultry. If greater than 120 square feet, setbacks of the underlying zone apply. If less than 120 square feet, side or rear yard setback is 3 feet. Tree Removal Covered in City of Tigard Title 18 so there Commercial forestry is prohibited. is no difference between City and County Commercial forestry is the removal of 10 or since the intergovernmental agreement more trees per acre per calendar year, not between Washington County and the City associated with a development. Removal of of Tigard was signed in May, 1997. In less than 10 trees per acre per calendar year is addition, in certain areas in Bull Mountain, permitted. If trees are removed as part of a based on the Bull Mountain community development, a mitigation plan must be plan, tree removal for development is reviewed and approved. limited to 50%. Storage of RV's May store 1 RV or boat on private property, Can not be located on the street for more than however, it may not be occupied. 10 days per calendar year. May be stored on private property as long as it is outside of vision clearance areas. May not be occupied. Animal Control Washington County Animal Control regulates licenses, nuisances, removal of Washington County Animal Control regulates licenses, nuisances, removal of dead animals, dead animals etc etc The above table is a GENERAL summary only, and it is strongly recommended that all property owners contact the City of Tigard and/or Washington County if there is a .specific issue they would like information about. In instances where the City standards are more restrictive than the County standards, uses that were in existence and legally created prior to the Urban Services Agreement would be considered pre-existing non-conforming. A pre- existing legal non-conforming use may remain but may not be enlarged or expanded and may not be discontinued for more than 6 months without losing its non-conforming status. 2. Mow will the City's Development Code and Municipal Code affect the daily life of a Bull Mountain resident? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) In most cases the answer is that it won't, since land-use issues are now reviewed under Tigard's land-use code standards. There are additional County code issues relative to home occupations, construction hours, and public rights-of-way, that will come into play when annexed, however, citizens will see little difference from what they see now. People are encouraged to evaluate individual differences between the two jurisdictions by reviewing the various standards themselves. Page 16 DRAFT For Internal Review 3. Will existing home businesses (specific example was a bed and breakfast) have to change the way they operate? Will they need to pay more for permits? How will annexation affect home businesses? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) The bed-and-breakfast operation will become a nonconforming use in Tigard. A pre-existing legal non-conforming use may remain but may not be enlarged or expanded and may not be discontinued for more than 6 months without losing its non-conforming status. The City will be considering regulations for bed-and-breakfasts in the future. Existing home businesses would be required pay an annual business tax. Land-use permits are currently based on County fees, which are more than City fees. The City of Tigard is studying its fees, and they may change. All City home occupation standards now apply within the Urban Services Area with the exception of the existing County regulations that the City adopted, including prohibiting outside storage, distribution of materials or sales outside the home, and parking of a commercial vehicle as part of a home occupation, which are all part of the County code. 4. Currently, residents of Bull Mountain enjoy life as a rural community. Will annexation affect the current standards involving livestock, farmland, and rural atmosphere? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) The Tigard Development Code provisions related to livestock state that when an agricultural use is adjacent to a residential use, no poultry or livestock, other than normal household pets, may be housed or be provided use of a fenced run within 100' of any nearby residence, except a dwelling unit on the same lot. Existing conditions would remain nonconforming unless changed by development. Regarding farmland and the area's rural character: Those areas considered for annexation are zoned for urban development at 5,000 sq-ft. lots. That is no different from Washington County. There are, however, many larger undeveloped lots that probably would still consider themselves "rural". These areas are most likely to be found in the eastern sub-area and found throughout portions of the southern sub-area. Piease refer to the comparison provided in Table 2 above, that shows how some identified issues differ between the City and County. For specific issues, you will need to contact the City and/or County. There is no requirement for properties to develop, however, if land develops, it is required to be developed to the minimum density. The minimum density is calculated at 80% of the maximum. Washington County recently adopted similar standards. H. OTHER QUESTIONS 1. (Some) Bull Mountain residents like the County because the County has pretty much left them alone. Will the City continue this laissez-faire attitude? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) It was not clear what exactly was meant by this question since there are rules and regulations in the County that every resident must follow and if they are found to be in violation of a standard, appropriate action would be taken to bring them into compliance. The City of Page 17 DRAFT For Internal Review Tigard does not go out "searching" for violators of land use and development standards, however, if a resident or property owner is found to be in violation of a standard (and is not a pre-existing non-conforming use) the City's code compliance officer would work with them to bring them into compliance. Washington County and the City of Tigard have a variety of standards and regulations. Table 2, above, illustrates some of these differences. Both jurisdictions are complaint driven with regards to enforcement of regulations and standards. 2. How will the City identify what the residents want before and after annexation? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) The City held a Focus Group meeting with Bull Mountain residents in July 2001; the questions in this document reflect residents' queries at that meeting. The issue of annexation is subject to Council direction. Based upon the direction Council decides on, public outreach will be determined. 3. Does annexation affect school boundaries? (Answer provided by City of Tigard) No, school district boundaries for elementary, middle and high schools are determined by the school districts. In addition, there are two school districts: the Tigard-Tualatin School District and the Beaverton School District. The City is not a decision maker in the district or school boundary lines, however we do provide data, as requested, on the number of lots approved which helps each district in their school boundary decision making. 4. What is the difference in service levels between the County and the City? The following table summarizes the level of service provided in the County and what will be provided by the City if the area were annexed. Table 3 - Service Provision in the Bug mountain s tua Fxrea Police Washington Countyprovides : The City of Tigard p(ovides Yes 1.0 officers/1000. people 1.5 offcers71000•people . (.5 standard; .5 from Enhanced Patrol) Fire/Rescue Tualatin: Valley'Fire & Rescue ;Tualatin Valley,Fire" Rescue s N- ` provides -servlceS. #o provide tervlCeS CQntinues Parks Washington County does not e ' Tigard' Parks standard is 765 nts. This 00~0':rdsid acresifo every' _1 Yes`` . s. provide parks"servic .t , e 1 rid- krads,,open space;an.JTriroved,parks l7r til parks coilld,te provided.in ;Bull Mountain,-the City ratio would be a" • roxirnaiel =6:74/1000. ' Page 18 DRAFT For Internal Review General Road Washington County through the The City's road maintenance Yes+ Maintenance Urban Road Maintenance District. performs maintenance on regular General street maintenance by the schedules as well as on a complaint- County is primarily on a complaint- driven basis. Typical maintenance driven basis. Typical maintenance activities include: activities include: • pothole patching • pothole patching • grading graveled roads • grading graveled roads • cleaning drainage facilities • cleaning drainage facilities • street sweeping • street sweeping • mowing roadside grass and • mowing roadside grass and brush (only the shoulder strip) brush.(shoulder strip + ditch line) • maintaining traffic signals • maintaining.traffic signals • replacing damaged signs • replacing damaged signs • installing and replacing street markings • crack sealing • vegetation removal for vision clearance • streef tight tree'trimming for light clearance. • dust abatement on graveled . -roads • . Sanitary Sewer Clean Water Services (CWS) The,City.of Tigard will meet the No same level of service as. CWS. All service'levels for CWS and .surrounding jurisdictions must be uniform b Jul' ;2003. Storm Sewer Clean Water Services (CWS) The City of Tigard will meet the No same level of service as CWS. All service levels for CWS:and surrounding: jurisdictions must be uniform b Jul 2003... Water Intergovernmental Water Board Service remains`the same. Tigard No contracts with the Tigard. Water . , Water'Distnct will:continue •to provide 'DistrictAo provide water.-i waterbut will'tiill directly: Street Light Washington .County administers The City'ofjigard-will assume all Yes Maintenance Service Districts for Lighting for costs for street light operations and PGE. Residents pay an annual maintenance.for ekisting lights. operations and maintenance Residents d.not;pay a separate assessment.. assessment. Community The City of Tigard.provides building The. City of Tigard ;will continue to Yes T Development and :services--including land use provide building services to this, area. Building Services decisions,; buiidinga nd.. rjcJCr an . engineering--u,_ All,tand-usebecisions yvdl contmueao intergovernmental<agreement with be reviewedru'nderttie City Washington*, y.. t.. standards and,through the City's hearing process:. The City would,:be . A11 land use decisions are reviewed ' . the'review authonty:for legislative .under the-City standards and actions as well .(zone changes, through the Cit `'s hearing process comprehensive plan amendments.. Page 19 DRAFT For Internal Review with the exception of legislative actions (zone changes, Comprehensive Plan amendments, etc.) etc). Library Washington County Cooperative The City of Tigard, which receives Yes Library Services (WCCLS) approximately 62% of its funding Consortium, which provides funding through the WCCLS. Bull Mountain through the county tax to area residents would have influence on libraries, including Tigard. the library's services, and could advocate,for the services-the want. Schools Both the Beaverton School District Annexation does not.change,school No and the Tigard School District district boundaries. provide service based on district boundaries. 1_COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS (Answers provided by City of Tigard) 1. What is the difference between the Washington County permanent rate vs. City of Tigard permanent rate? The County rate is $2.2484 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. The City of Tigard's rate is $2.5131. The County permanent rate pays for countywide services such as juvenile justice, jails, courts, social services, etc. The City permanent rate pays for local services such as police, parks, library, and a portion of land use planning and street maintenance services. Following annexation, Bull Mountain property owners, like all City of Tigard property owners, will pay both permanent rates. It should be noted that the permanent rate does not include special district assessments such as the Urban Road Maintenance District or Enhanced Sheriff Patrol District. Upon annexation, Bull Mountain property owners will not pay the special district assessments anymore. For a home assessed at $227,775, this amounts to a difference of $256.50 per year. Refer to Table 6 for a complete breakdown of property tax assessments. 2. How would annexation affect Tigard's "tax base" and tax rate? Since the passage of Measure 50, there are no longer any tax bases in the State of Oregon. Measure 50 eliminated tax bases in favor of permanent tax rates. Tigard's rate will not change as a result of annexation. Following annexation, the City permanent tax rate will be applied to assessed values in the newly annexed area, producing additional property tax revenue for the City to help pay for City services provided to those areas. 3. What would property taxes be if annexation happens? Property taxes will be based on Tigard's permanent rate and the total assessed value of your property. The tax rate is permanent. For a home assessed at $227,755, annexation would increase taxes by approximately $256.50 per year. See the attached Table 6 for a complete breakdown of all the assessments paid in the County and the City of Tigard. If the assessed Page 20 DRAFT For Internal Review value increases, the property tax paid will increase as well, however, it should be noted that a property's assessed value can only be raised a maximum of 3% per year. 4. Would there be any additional taxes beyond property taxes (such as existing local option taxes in Tigard)? Currently, the City of Tigard has one General Obligation Bond tax levy for construction of the Civic Center and transportation improvements. For a home assessed at $227,755, it equates to approximately $51.77 a year. The last year of this levy is FY 2002-03. Tigard does not have a Local Option Levy. Bull Mountain property owners now pay the following taxes for general government services, and would continue to pay them under annexation: Washington County, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, Port of Portland and Metro. Bull Mountain property owners (like Tigard property owners) now pay the following taxes to support General Obligation bonds, and would continue to pay them under annexation: Washington County, Portland Community College, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, Port of Portland, Metro and Tri-Met. However, Bull Mountain property owners would cease paying the following taxes for general government services, as these services would be assumed by the City of Tigard: Washington County Enhanced Patrol, Washington County Road Maintenance and Street Lighting districts. For a home assessed at $227,755, the net increase (after subtracting the special district assessments and adding in the City of Tigard permanent tax rate and one general obligation bond) in property taxes would be approximately $256.50 a year. 5. What potential local option taxes are on the horizon? (schools, roads, etc.) Tigard is considering placing a General Obligation Bond levy on the ballot in 2002 to build a new library. The size of the bond is currently under development, so the tax impact is not yet known. This information will be developed well in advance of the election. The Tigard-Tualatin School District is also considering a General Obligation Bond levy to be referred to the voters in 2002. Annexation to the City does not affect school district boundaries, however, so annexation will not affect this levy. (Attendance boundaries for elementary, middle and high schools are set by the respective school district. Annexation has no impact on the attendance boundaries.) The Washington County Cooperative Library Services (WCCLS) is considering going out for a local option levy in 2002, however, if this bond were approved it would be paid regardless of whether annexation occurred. Other overlapping jurisdictions may also be considering bond levies or Local Option Levies, but the City has no information on these plans. It should be noted that any decision on proposed bonds rests solely with the voters in the district to be served. Page 21 DRAFT For Internal Review 6. How much additional revenue for Tigard would annexation generate? What would the additional revenue be at build-out? The following table shows the Projected Revenues and Costs by Funds for Bull Mountain Area upon annexation with the existing population. Numbers in parentheses represent balance shortfalls. Fund General State Gas Tax Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Water Revenue $2,161,822 $319,081 $202,904 $97,524 $1,767,550 Operating Cost 1,298,469 391,932 $85,597 78,188 691,659 Balance $863,353 ($72,851) $117,307 $19,336 $1,075,891 haute 4-K - une-time Lanitai costs Fund Fund Balance/ Capital Improvements Balance Capital Revenues Traffic Impact Fee $370,640 0 $370,640 Parks SDC $268,960 $13,105,000 ($12,836,040) Water SDC $334,724 0 $334,724 Page 22 DRAFT For Internal Review The next table shows the Projected Revenues and Costs by Funds for Bull Mountain Area at build-out which is 80% of the maximum buildable using vacant and re-developable land. a H H c~ a Table 5-A - Ongoine Operating Costs Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance General $3,806,006 $2,260,681 $1,545,325 State Gas Tax $535,816 $628,011 ($92,195) Sanitary Sewer $361,318 $143,739 $217,579 Storm Sewer $173,664 $131,300 $42,364 Water $1,767,550 691,659 $1,075,891 Table 5-B - One-time U a iaai %-,oszs Fund Fund Balance/ Capital Improvements Balance Ca ital Revenues Traffic Impact Fee $5,150,540 $12,718,600 ($7,568,060) Parks SDC $3,737,560 $22,033,000 ($18,295,440) Water SDC $4,651,439 $816,400 $3,835,039 7. How is the annexation study being paid for? Funding for this study comes from the City's General Fund. 8. How much money will be available for infrastructure under Tigard versus under Washington County? The Bull Mountain Study, prepared by the City of Tigard, identifies infrastructure needs for the entire area. Transportation and park improvements exceed revenue projections. At this point funding strategies have not been determined to address the infrastructure needs of the area. 9. If annexation happens, how much of the Bull Mountain revenue stream will stay in the Bull Mountain area? How much will stay in Tigard, and where will it go? The City does not segregate revenues by geographic area. Revenues are used to provide needed services to all citizens. As part of the annexation study, the City is in the process of identifying those services needed in the Bull Mountain area, and if annexed, the City will provide services. Page 23 DRAFT For Internal Review 10. By annexing, would the additional revenue coming to Tigard actually outweigh any additional costs to the City? The tables (4A, 4B, 5A and 5B) above show that, in some funds the City would have increase in revenue whereas in other funds the City would see a shortfall in order to provide the level of service currently provided to City of Tigard residents. 11. Are there additional benefits (such as grants) that become available to the City of Tigard if they annex Bull Mountain that aren't available now? Are there any negative consequences to the City if they don't annex Bull Mountain? The Federal Government offers the Entitlement City Program to those cities with a population of at least 50,000. The program makes cities eligible for HUD grants. The 2000 Census shows Tigard's population as 41,223. If Bull Mountain is annexed, 7,268 current residents will be added, for a total of 48,491. If the Bull Mountain area is fully built out to the minimum density, the study projects an additional 5,637 residents. The City would be eligible for Entitlement City grants in the year it reaches 50,000 population, which depends on the area's rate of growth. In addition to grants, certain state shared revenues (such as cigarette tax, liquor tax, state revenue sharing, and state gas tax) that are shared with cities based on formulas that include (among other factors) population. The share of these revenues to Tigard will increase with annexations. The City currently provides some services to the Bull Mountain area under contract to Washington County. These services (such as land use permitting and building inspection) will probably continue to be provided as along as fees charged for these services continue to cover costs. However, Bull Mountain residents also use City of Tigard facilities for which they are not assessed; i.e., the library and parks. Growth in population in an un-annexed area, such as Bull Mountain, requires increasing levels of service from the City without a corresponding increase in funding. This can result in lower levels of service for all citizens, whether they live in un-annexed areas or within the City itself. l:lrplan/julia/annexation/Draft answers to the questions.doc 11/7/o1 3:24 PM Page 24 The Bull Mountain Annexation Study City Council Presentation Nov. 27, 2001 Bull Mountain Project History •1997: Tigard and Washington County enter into urban services agreement. 'transfers land development, building permit activity to City. .March 2001: City Council creates goal to establish annexation policy for non-island areas. Directs staff to study feasibility of annexing Bull Mountain area. ❑ ❑ The Bull Mountain Area ❑ 0.11 MI M.Uy A... V I.My M.V a °o •1,440 Acres of Land ❑ •7,300 Residents o .Residentially Zoned °o 1. .Mix of Development ❑ -Farms, Subdivisions ❑ w o. ❑ - Bull Mountain Project History •1988: Tigard and Washington County recognize Tiigard's active interest in planning and development of Bull Mtn. •1993: Senate Bill 122 passes. Requires coordination, provision of urban services for lands within the Urban Growth Boundary. Bull Mountain Project History .July 2001: Focus Group meeting with Bull Mountain residents. Gives residents opportunity to ask annexation questions, which influence scope of study. .November 2001: Study complete rea Summary ■ North and South are the most populated and built-out ■ South has the most existing homes ■ East has the most potential for growth 1 rban Services in the Study Area Today, the City of Tigard Provides Bull Mountain Residents With: .Community Development • Building Services • Water (through a contract with the Intergovernmental Water Board) n Services in the Study Area What Service Changes Would Occur For Area Residents with Annexation? ■ Police .Additional .5 officer per 1,000 people ■ Parks ■ General Road Maintenance .City standards include more services Scenario 1: Current ■ Includes current dwellings and approved subdivisions ■ 2,700 Housing Units n 7,680 Residents rban Services in the Study Area Annexation, the City Would Provide: • Police • Sanitary Sewer • Parks • Storm Sewer • General Street o Street Light Maintenance Maintenance • Garbage Collection • Library Scenarios ■ To Evaluate Current and Future Service Needs for the Study Area, Three Growth and Development Scenarios Were Created: • Scenario 1: Current .Scenario 2: Buildout + Scenario 3: Moderate Growth Scenario 2: Buildout .Based on development of today's vacant and partially developed lands .4,824 Housing Units .12,905 Residents ®Approximately 1.5x Scenario 1 2 Scenario 3: Moderate Growth ■ 50% of New Growth in Scenario 2 ■ 3,755 Housing Units 10,235 Residents Conclusions ■ With the exception of the East Subarea, the majority of Bull Mountain is almost built out. m Assuming Scenario 2 buildout of approximately 12,905 residents and 4,8; housing units, each subarea could reach buildout at different times. ;sues for Consideration Development will occur regardless of annexation. How do we work with Washington County in the interim to capture park funding; i.e., SDCs? dy Conclusions ■ Capital costs exceed projected revenues. Operating costs are less than revenues, except for the Gas Tax. ■ The significant need for road and parks improvements would be the major consideration in annexation. Study Conclusions ■ Revenue projections are mostly dependent upon growth. Rate, amount of growth determine revenue forecasts. ■ For a Bull Mountain home assessed at $227, 755 (median), the net increase in property taxes would be approximately $256.50 per year with annexation. for Consideration Annexation process has to be completed by March of a calendar year for properties to be on the tax rolls July 1st. The annexation process will require significant City resources, which will be determined by how Council wants to proceed. 3 es for Consideration There are several annexation methods. Some require a vote, either by the area to be annexed or the entire City. .City Initiated .Owner Initiated eIsland Annexation for Discussion Are there advantages to a phased annexation plan? How will this affect the funding of Capital Improvements? Should the City consider only partial annexation, leaving other subareas to the County indefinitely? questions for Discussion How do we fund Capital Improvements in the area? • Use a portion of the General Fund • Washington County assistance • Form LIDs • Grants • Delay improvements until funding is available • Park Levy • Special Districts ues for Consideration The timing of capital improvements, such as parks, needs to be determined with annexation. There are three pending annexation requests in the study area. estions for Discussion Do we continue to allow incremental annexation of vacant or developed land in the area? How do we involve residents in this process? Should we create a task force to Identify resident needs and preferences? ext Steps Schedule a public meeting for Bull Mtn. Residents in mid- to late January Notify by mail all July Focus Group attendees and residents who requested placement on our mailing list. Interested persons contact Beth St. Amand at 503/639-4171, ext. 648 4 text Steps Follow up with City Council after January public meeting with residents. es of the Report Available Dec. 1 : .City's website, www.ci.tigard.or.us • Reference copy at Uie Tigard Public Library .Copies for Review or Purchase at Community Development Counter at City Hall AGENDA ITEM # 5 FOR AGENDA OF 11/27/01 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE TMC 10 28 030 Parkin, - Truck trailer, bus camper, motorhome recreational vehicle, and boat restrictions PREPARED BY: Ronald D. Goodnaster DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should TMC 10.28.030 be amended to eliminate the language "house trailer," and refer to definitions in the ORS rather than referring to definitions in the TMC which then refers to ORS. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the change to the ordinance be approved. INFORMATION SUMMARY Currently the TMC refers to "a house trailer." There is no such definition in the CRS. Also TMC 10.28.030 refers to the definitions listed in TMC 10.28.010 (c), which in turn refers to ORS 801.560. This double referral needs to be eliminated so the TMC refers directly to ORS. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED No other alternatives considered. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Not related. ATTACHMENTS Ordinance amending Section TMC 10.28.030 Current TMC 10.28.030 FISCAL NOTES There are no additional costs attached to this change. iAcitywide\sum.dot AGENDA ITEM # Lo FOR AGENDA OF 11/27/01 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Amending Section 2.46 of the Tigard Municipal Code relating to the Local Contract Review Board PREPARED BY: Terry Muralt DEPT HEAD OK_ CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall Council accept the amending and updating of Section 2.46 of the Tigard Municipal Code relating to the Local Contract Review Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Accept the amending and updating cf Section 2.46 of the Tigard Municipal Code relating to the Local Contract Review Board. INFORMATION SUMMARY Section 2.46 of the Tigard Municipal Code relating to the Local Contract Review Board has not been updated since 1996. The amending and updating of Section 2.46 is part of the larger project of updating the entire Tigard Municipal Code that , s initiated by the City Manager earlier this year. In summary, the major changes in the TMC 2.46 are as follows: • 2.46.010 Policy - Additional language has been incorporated regarding federal funds involved in any contracts subject to this chapter. • 2.46.060 Meetings: _Notice: tii.,-;nda - Deleted wording relating to Board agenda exemptions. The wording was determined not necessary for this chapter. • 2.46.070 Attendance: Ouorum: Voting - There was duplication of wording in section (b) and (c) regarding the voting action of the Board. These sections were deleted and put into section (a) to read: All actions ofthe Board shall requ.,e a majority vote of the board members present and voting. • 2.46.130 Petty Cash - This section was determined not necessary for this chapter and is being deleted. Petty Cash or "Imprest Cash Accounts" is covered in chapter 3.04. e 2.46.140 Limitation to expe ldigM - Clarifies expenditures in regards to projects and type of contracts. • 2.46.160 Duties of the Finar,.,P Director - This section was determined not necessary for this chapter and is being deleted. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Reject update and proceed to revise amendments per Council's request. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY None A 1 1 Aumy1n~1V 1 Ljla 1 Ordinance r 16UAL IN U t r_3 None C•`TTT~~IIDTi November 28, 2001 Washington County Board of Commissioners 155 N First Ave Suite 300 Hillsboro OR 97124 FILING OF LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD REVISIONS At it's November 27, 2001 meeting, the Tigard City Council passed Ordinance 01-24, adopting revised provisions relating to the City's Local Contract Review Board. Pursuant to ORS 279.055, 1 am required to file this document with you. Should you have any questions, you can reach me at 503.639.4171 ext. 382 or greer@ci.tigard.or.us. Greer A. Gaston Deputy City Recorder Enclosure: Ordinance 01-24 c: Terry Muralt Craig Prosser I:1ADM\GREER\CORRESPOND\LETTERS\LCRB FILING REQUEST W COUNTY.DOC 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 AGENDA ITEM # 1 FOR AGENDA OF November 27, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Vote on the City of Tigard's Choice for the Washington County Other Cities Alternate Position - Metro Policy Advisory Board (MPAC) PREPARED BY:1thy Wheatley DEPT HEAD OK V4-0-r---CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Select City of Tigard's choice for the Washington County Other Cities Alternate Position for the Metro Policy Advisory Committee (MPAC). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Pass a motion nominating the City of Tigard's selection for the MPAC alternate position. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City of Tigard City Council submitted Mayor Jim Griffith's name to Beaverton Mayor Rob Drake as Tigard's nomination for the vacant MPAC Alternate position for "Other Cities in Washington County." One other nomination was forwarded to Mayor Drake: Sherwood City Councilor Angela Weeks. The City has now received a request from MPAC staff (attached) to vote on its selection for the vacancy. Once the Council's selection is made, the City Recorder will notify MPAC staff's of Tigard's vote. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A ATTACHMENT LIST November 15, 2001, Letter from Metro MPAC Staff. FISCAL NOTES N/A I:=M\PACKET'01\20011127\MPAC NOM AIS.DOC 6 0 0 N O R T H E A S T G R A N D A V E N U E I P O R T LAN D. ORE G O N 9 7 2 3 2 2 7 3 6 T E L 5 0 3 7 9 7 1 7 0 0 F A X 5 0 3 7 9 7 1 7 9 7 November 15, 2001 The Honorable Jim Griffith City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mayor Griffith: 11 111 ~~~•/I ,,/~ii~ ~~O/ 410/ ®coMETRO 16 ZQ 1` Y') The Washington County Other Cities Alternate position on the Metro Policy Advisory Committee (MPAC) is currently vacant. Recently, Rob Drake, Mayor of Beaverton solicited nominations from the Cities in Washington County to fill that position. The nominees are: Jim Griffith, Mayor of Tigard Angela Weeks, Sherwood City Councilor I would ask that at an upcoming Tigard City Council Meeting that the City Council indicate by vote who their selection would be to fill that position. If you would ask your Council Clerk to notify me of the selection after the vote, I would appreciate it very much. If there are questions, do not hesitate to contact me at (503) 797-1501. Sinc ely, Cathy Kirc r MPAC Staff Recycled Paper www.metro-reglon.org T O O 797 1804 AGENDA ITEM # (1L~L_ FOR AGENDA OF November 2 , 2001 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Invoice for Holiday Tree Electrical Work PREPARED BY: J. Hendryx DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK / ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should Council authorize payment of $4,949 to the Tigard Central Business District Association (TCBDA) to pay for electrical work for the holiday tree that will be set up in the downtown area? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize payment of the invoice for the electrical work. INFORMATION SUMMARY In the past, the City of Tigard has held the annual holiday tree lighting celebration at City Hall. This year, City Council voted to allow the TCBDA to hold the celebration in Liberty Park on Main Street, in the downtown area. On November 13, 2001, TCBDA approached Council to request that the City pay for the electrical outlet for the tree. Council approved the request. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment #1 - Invoice from Oregon Electric Group FISCAL NOTES Cost of the electrical work is $4,949. There is $26,667 approved in this year's budget for TCBDA expenses. There have been no other expenses to date. FROM : TYLER W-26.01 10:41 fl&M1'Y TO., FAX NO. : N, A tachment 1 FROIher~nn f:ltactrlc Soattrete~t OR$( ON trLECTRIC GROUP WADI IINCTON ELM7171C GRnI IP 1090 SE 11TH Ave. PORTLAND, OR 97214 Invoice 38661 Bii to: TYLEX6 AUTOMOTIVE 12485 SW MAIN TIGARD, OR 97223 Job Address: Job: 38661 TYL.ER$ AUTOMOTIVE 12485 SW MAIN TIGARD, OR DeecAptlon of Work Completed CHRISTMAS TREE ELECTRICAL - PER QUOTATION BY ROB TEAGUE 11/8/01 Material Used U41 or Ruanthy oe rApftn Meeau,o Unit PrIce Exten5W 1.00 AS QUOTED EA 4.949.00 4,9'9.00 r nta LAbPr 1 4AU-00 0.00 4,448.00 0.00 THE GOAL OF OUR C.P.I. PROGRAM IS 100% CUSTOMER SATISFACTION ! InvaicoTatal: 4.949.00 Atnt rase: 11=1