Loading...
City Council Packet - 06/22/1999 .N C F POO OREGON J~ TIGR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 22,1999 COUNCIL MEETING WILL NOT E TELEVISED I:,admyo'ccp".d 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tlgard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 634-2772 Revised on 6/18199 ;i^Fi;t3y y'i} t ry,1. i xl (h„ay+?t:1rY sr {~lr,YiatY`"4~ k4 v oc r n.St f,3'pfY Ktiv'~'S ' xT~GaP~ "F,~C6~ 6' ~ aK t R xne +..n f. s. 4{L c~.t+it,~.t~'a h`t?~ xrs ~l- R Y N 2i„1tiV f/WYR Y'~tA J 1 ~t 'Y~brP\@Y) ' 5.,i F1x ' ; -~~f4a 1; f t CITY OF TIGARD x.TIGAfi;® CBs. ~AI:I.r~~h~ x c..r s d ra t t I b t a m ' 125 1 S~II HA'L,LI,~VD:~}~ r5il r + n ~'It t -rri' pK S`iiF x~ S'.la~. i! xr y t }F~N +n4iN.+ .t1!f N.~.l4.I Y.+>.'e.+l l' +.f VA i,l._ a.1Y c l.PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor°s Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone + numbers as listed above: 639-4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 22,1999 - PAGE 1 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 22, 1999 AGENDA 6:30 PM s STUDY SESSION > EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), '(e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore those present may disclose nothing from this meeting. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. > DISCUSSION: SIDEWALK DESIGN ISSUES DISCUSSION - TIGARD TRIANGLE (Continued from the 6/15/99 Council Meeting) > DISCUSSION: STATUS OF FANNO CREEK PATH 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 7:35 PM 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) 7:40 PM 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Receive & File: Americans with Disabilities Act - Facility Compliance i Update 3.2 Approve Tualatin Valley Cable Access (TVCA) Public, Education and Government (PEG) Access Franchise Fee - Resolution No. 99-!f (Z 3.3 Approve Budget Adjustment No. 11 - Receipt of prthland Insurance Company Funds - $450,004 - Resolution No. 99- L/ s 3.4 Approve Appointments of Liz wton and Dee Wise as Deputy City a Recorders - Resolution No. 99- 2.. COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 22,1999 - PAGE 2 111111111 mmmi 3.5 Declare the Need to Acquire Property for the Improvement of Certain Streets within the Boundaries of the 691' Avenue Local Improvement District -Resolution No. 99- q3 3.6 Amend the Intergovernmental Agreement with Metro for Pass-Through of Greenspaces Funds - Resolution No. 99- ad • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 7:45 PM 4. PUBLIC HEARING -1998-99 USES OF STATE REVENUE SHARING a. Public Hearing Opened b. Declarations or Challenges C. Summation by Staff d. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents) e. Recommendation by Finance Director f. Council Questions or Comments 9- Public Hearing Closed h. Consideration by Council: _ • RESOLUTION No. 99- - A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY OF TIGARD PROVIDES SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR STATE SHARED REVENUES • ORDINANCE No. 99- /(D - AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE CITY'S ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES 7:50 PM 5. PUBLIC HEARING -1999-00 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET a. Public Hearing Opened b. Summation by Staff C, Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents) d. Recommendation by Staff e. Council Questions or Comments f. Public Hearing Closed g. Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 99- 4-6 8:00 PM 6. PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM a. Staff Report: City Engineer b. Open Public Comment (Proponents, Opponents) C. Close Public Comment d. Council Discussion e. Council Consideration: Determine, by Council motion, the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 1999-00 COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 22,1999 - PAGE 3 8:20 PM 7. INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING - FORMATION OF SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 13 - SW 100TH AVENUE WEST OF INEZ o Open Hearing • Staff Report: Engineering Department • Public Testimony • Council Questions • Staff Recommendation • Close Hearing • Council Deliberation: Resolution No. 99/1/y? 8:35 PM 8. PUBLIC HEARING - (QUASI-JUDICAL) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT (CPA 1999-00001, SLR 1999-00003 The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges C. Staff/Applicant Report: Community Development Department d. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents, Rebuttal by City as applicant) e. Council Questions f. Close Public Hearing g. Staff Recommendation h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 99-~ 8:55 PM 9. FORWARD INITIATED BALLOT MEASURE TO WASHINGTON COUNTY ELECTIONS DIVISION FOR THE SEPTEMBER 21, 1999, SPECIAL ELECTION a. Staff Report: Administration Department b. Council Discussion C. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 99- COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 22,1999 - PAGE 4 r 9:00 PM 10. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR PACIFIC RIDGE TO USE CITY PROPERTY FOR PRIVATE WETLANDS (MITIGATION ® Staff Report: Community Development Department o Council Consideration: Motion to Allow Pacific Ridge and Specht Development Company to Use City Property for Private Wetlands Mitigation 9:20 PM 11. WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION -REQUEST FOR FUNDING (Discussion continued from the 6/15/99 Council Meeting) a. Update from Mayor Nicoll 9:30 PM 12. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 9:40 PM 13. NON AGENDA ITEMS 9:50 PM 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore those present may disclose nothing from this meeting. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. 10:00 PM 15. ADJOURNMENT MADM\CATHYICCM990622.DOC COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 22,1999 - PAGE 5 "11MEN 11MI NINE 1111101 ~illillimill NINE Agenda item No. Meeting of_, 1 D TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 STUDY SESSION > Meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m. by Mayor Jim Nicoli > Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli, Councilors Paul Hunt, Brian Moore, Joyce Patton, and Ken Scheckla. > Staff Present: City Manager Bill Monahan; Property Manager John Roy; City Recorder Catherine Wheatley; Associate Planner Duan-. Roberts; Long Range Planner Nadine Smith; Public Works Director Ed Wiz;;ner; Legal Counsel Tim Ramis; City Engineer Gus Duenas; Planner Mark Roberts > DISCUSSION: SIDEWALK DESIGN ISSUES DISCUSSION - TIGARD TRIANGLE (Continued from the 6/15/99 Council Meeting) Gus Duenas, City Engineer, reviewed the three options he asked Mr. DeHaas, the City's consulting engineer, to develop for the sidewalk design. He explained that because this was a unit foot price project, they could move the sidewalk back and forth without impacting the cost very much, as long as they did not affect the quantities. He said that the three options were to move the sidewalk to the curb, to meander the sidewalk based on cut and fill, and to build the sidewalk along the property line with keystone walls built as necessary. He stated that the options of moving the sidewalk and meandering the sidewalk added no costs to the project while building the keystone wails would add between $10,000 to $15,000 to the project cost. Mr. Duenas mentioned the meeting staff held with Mrs. Corliss and Specht Development this afternoon. He explained that because Specht did not want the delay that moving the sidewalk to the curb would cause, Specht preferred leaving the design alone and making the two sides of the street symmetrical. He stated that if the Council approved meandering for the Corliss side, then Specht wanted meandering sidewalks also. Mr. Duenas indicated that meandering sidewalks was a compromise proposed by staff. He reiterated that moving the sidewalk to the curb was not feasible for this project because it would take too long to go through the process of changing the standard. Councilor Scheckla mentioned the poorly maintained condition of separated sidewalks in the area. He asked if they could allow the construction work to continue while granting a waiver for the sidewalk in order to allow sufficient time to modify the standard. Mr. Duenas explained that the contractor would install the curbs and utilities early during the construction. He said that once they did that, then they would want to install the walkways. Mayor Nicoli asked Mrs. Corliss for her comments. Mrs. Corliss reviewed a color map she had made to illustrate the locations of the existing curbside sidewalks. She said that she became involved because the City design impacted her landscaping work along the fence. She said that it made sense to have the sidewalk continuous as opposed to suddenly changing its configuration. She stated that their preference was for curb- tight sidewalks all the way around. She indicated that the Schneiders, one of the homeowners, preferred curb-tight sidewalks for a wider buffer between their property line and the sidewalk. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 1 Mrs. Corliss addressed the issue of a timely response. She explained that when she and her husband saw the plans in January, the plans showed a curb-tight sidewalk. They did not find out about the changed layout until May 7. She said that they immediately met with Mr. DeHaas. She asked why installing meandering sidewalks instead of the planned design would not delay the Specht development just as much as changing the design to curb-tight sidewalks would. She pointed out that the standards called for 12 feet of sidewalk and therefore, by definition, the plans did not meet the standards. Mrs. Corliss asked why the City could not grant them a variance to build the sidewalks the way they preferred them. She stated that she did not see an aesthetic conflict between having one side of a block one way and the other side something different. Mayor Nicoli stated that the Council would gladly consider a .,uiiance if it were an available option. He explained that, due to both time and legal requirements, they knew that it was not option. He commented that, although the Council has directed staff to revisit the sidewalk issu'- in the Triangle in the future, that did not help the Corlisses. He said that, for right now, the best they could do was push the land use laws as far as possible. He pointed out that the City had to get permission from the State to change its land use laws. Mrs. Corliss said that she understood the implications of setting a precedent. Mayor Nicoli commented that the best way to handle these situations was to foresee them and to write in the flexibility that the Council needed to address these situations. He noted the difficulty the City had in developing a Triangle plan and the fine-tuning the Council has done in recent months. He reiterated that the Council had to follow the law until it could get the law changed. Mayor Nicoli mentioned that another complication was the requirement on the Specht development approval that the road be completed around the same time as their building. He indicated that they could not delay the project in this case, as they could in other situations. Councilor Patton asked for clarification on staff's option to meander the sidewalk. Mr. Duenas confirmed that staff had the latitude within the standard to meander the sidewalk in response to topographical constraints. He said that the Specht property also had topographical constraints that would allow a meandering sidewalk. Councilor Scheckla asked for clarification on why the Corlisses did not know until May 7 that the staff had changed the sidewalk design. Mr. Duenas confirmed that the design had shown curbside sidewalks at the January meeting. He explained that they changed the design when Planning staff notified them that they were not following the Triangle standards. He stated that they noticed the change for the second meeting. Mayor Nicoli summarized the staff viewpoint. Staff proposed an option of meandering sidewalks (allowable within the rules) that would provide some relief to the Corlisses for 30% of their property and save the City $10,000 by not having to build walls. 'T'odd Schaeffer, Specht Development, stated that at the second meeting they voiced the same concerns as those raised by the Corlisses with regard to the change in sidewalk design. He said that this street did not need planter strips to buffer pedestrian traffic from auto traffic. He reiterated that people getting out of their cars would step on the planters, not on the sidewalks. He mentioned Mr. Duenas' information at the meeting that the change responded to a design standard which could not be changed without going through a lengthy process. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 2 Mr. Schaeffer conceded that it would take an unusual step outside the proscribed process for the Council to decide tonight to change the design to curb-tight sidewalks. He reiterated that they supported the Corlisses option for curb-tight sidewalks. He described their concern as the City not getting the image it wanted in the Triangle if the two sides of a street looked different from each other. Mr. Schaeffer commented that meandering a 12-foot sidewalk strip would look unusual, as the meandering sidewalks shown in the pictures needed a 20-25 foot strip to achieve their park-like look. He argued that, with a narrow strip, the meandering would be tight and not look natural. He said that planting the trees in a linear strip either next to the curb or next to the right-of-way also would took odd. He emphasized that they wanted an attractive first class location with the implementation of the Triangle standards. Councilor Hunt asked for clarification on what Specht Development wanted. Mr. Schaeffer said that they suggested leaving the design the way it was. Councilor Moore mentioned the lengthy process involving the property owners that the City used to develop the Triangle standards. He commented that it was unfortunate that Mr. Corliss, as a member of the Task Force, missed out that the standards called for separated sidewalks instead of curb-tight sidewalks. He spoke to sticking with the standards adopted via this process unless the Council went back through the process to change the standards. Councilor Moore said that the one situation that he would make provision for was flexibility for topographical constraints that disallowed following the standards stringently. He commented that he did not think people would notice anything unusual with the design once they completed the development of the area. He reiterated that he supported sticking with the standard but allowing adjustments for topographical constraints. Councilor Scheckla spoke to providing for more flexibility in the Triangle standards to allow adjustments to fit individual situations and to avoid the monotony of a uniform design. He argued that the area would be better maintained with curb-tight sidewalks, citing the lack of maintenance of existing parking strips. He contended that, without flexibility in the standards, they would not achieve the attractive image they wanted for the Triangle, as exemplified by the Landmark Ford property. He said that they needed incorporate more flexibility into the standards in order to prevent people from coming in to plea bargain with the Council. Councilor Patton agreed with the need to reevaluate the standard for greater flexibility, as discussed last week. She said that staff has developed a plan to allow some flexibility in response to topography. She commented that the plan addressed some of the issues in a small way. She indicated that she preferred a meandering sidewalk to the keystone wall, if doing so was consistent and allowable within the standard. Councilor Hunt stated that he did not understand the legal technicality of why staff could allow a meandering sidewalk but not a curb-tight sidewalk. Mr. Duenas explained that the standard specified a pedestrian-friendly walkway (a 12-foot walkway with trees between the curb and the pedestrians). He said that they could make an exception to the rule for reasons of topography and allow a meandering sidewalk but changing the design "wholesale to curb-tight sidewalks" would not meet the standard. Councilor Hunt stated that he was not convinced that it was legal to do it one way and not the other. Fie said that he preferred the curb-tight sidewalks. He disagreed that "pedestrian CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 3 friendly" included making people step into the planters as they got out of their cars. Mr. Duenas confirmed to Councilor Moore that the Triangle plan defined the standard as a 12- foot pedestrian walkway with the trees next to the curb. Mr. Monahan pointed out that Mr. Duenas was saying that going to the curb eliminated more of the elements and features of the design standard than meandering did. He indicated that Mr. Duenas conferred with Mr. Hendryx who made a Director's interpretation that meandering was more consistent with the standard than curb-tight. Councilor Scheckla spoke to modifying the standards while construction continued with the sidewalks installed at the end of the construction process. Mayor Nicoli pointed out that it would take six months to get a change through the entire process, including State approval. Mr. Monahan pointed out that allowing a change to one Triangle standard might precipitate requests to change other standards. Councilor Moore agreed that changing the standards opened up the possibility of the very situation they had tried to avoid with the standards in the first place: the Triangle as a hodgepodge of development. Mayor Nicoli summarized the Council discussion as a 5 to 0 decision to allow the plan to move forward. He mentioned the agreement last week to bring the entire standard back at a later date for further discussion. Mr. Monahan reiterated the three options before Council: adhere to the standard for sidewalks against the property line, authorize a meandering sidewalk, or initiate a Comprehensive Plan change resulting in a delay of the project. He confirmed to Councilor Hunt that whichever one they voted for applied uniformly throughout the Triangle. Councilor Moore pointed out that this was strictly an interpretation in looking at the topographical constraints, an option available to anyone who met the same conditions. Motion by Councilor Patton, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt the proposal for the exception to allow for the meandering sidewalk for this particular development to the extent that restrictions based on topography, etc., make this more amenable to this LID. Motion passed by majority voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Moore and Patton voted "yes;" Councilor Scheckla voted "no"; Councilor Hunt abstained.) [3-1-0] Mr. Schaeffer asked if Specht could meander the sidewalks on their side also. Councilor Moore said that they could do so if they had similar topographical constraints justifying the meandering. Mr. Monahan commented that the Council was giving staff authorization to look at situations on a case-by-case basis to determine if meandering was allowable. Councilor Moore concurred. N > COYOTES Mr. Monahan stated that about a month ago an issue concerning coyotes was raised. He { referenced the list of complaints distributed by Property Manager John Roy from neighbors in the area involved (from the railroad tracks in Cook Park over to SW 1086'). He mentioned working with the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) to address the problem. Councilor Scheckla mentioned the raccoon problem also. He asked how could they look at coyotes and not at raccoons. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 4 Mr. Monahan stated the question was: Did the Council want to do something about the coyotes or leave the situation alone? He indicated that the citizen concerns centered not only on cats and dogs but also on small children. He said that the USDA staff told them that the only method to handle coyotes was to trap and eradicate them; they could not be relocated or rehabilitated. It is believed that a breeding pair of wolves and their pups have settled in the area. Mr. Monahan asked if the Council wanted to authorize the USDA to set up a program to deal with the coyotes. He mentioned that the USDA staff did not recommend going to the press because the City would be flooded by people raising issues and they would not be able to get anything done. Councilor Scheckla mentioned hearing of coyotes sightings over by Deercreek Elementary and Fischer Road. John Roy, Property Manager, told Councilor Scheckla to give his phone number to the people complaining about raccoons and he would get them in touch with the USDA staff who handled trapping nuisance animals county-wide (at no cost to the citizens). Mr. Roy said that the USDA came to the City because of the numerous citizen complaints that the USDA had received from residents in the Copper Creek area. He stated that the USDA Wildlife Specialists evaluated the Copper Creek Greenway and determined that the coyotes had a nesting den somewhere down around the railroad trestle. He mentioned that the coyotes traveled a territory through the whole Riverwood Lane area. Mr. Roy indicated that the coyotes have been in the area long enough to lose their fear of man and have been seen taking cats. He said that the USDA Wildlife Specialists' concern sprang from the case studies that demonstrated that attacks of humans by coyotes started out with the same type of behavior as witnessed here. This behavior included occasional sightings on the street followed by going into yards and on to decks for peffood, and then progressing to attacking dogs and cats. He stated that the next step was coyotes attacking children under the age of five who could not run fast. Mr. Roy said that the USDA notified the Copper Creek Homeowners Association members to keep their pet food and pets inside. He reiterated that, although the citizens were concerned for their pets, their major concern was for their children. Mr. Roy said that the USDA Wildlife Service obtained written permission from all affected property owners to set up a trapping program. He mentioned that they had cooperation from the Unified Sewage Agency and the City of Durham also. He described the signage program they would implement to inform the park users of the trapping program. Mr. Roy commented that this was the first time in the 14 years he has worked at the City where they have had a coyote problem anywhere in the City. He pointed out that it was cyclical, and they might have to do it again when the coyotes returned. He emphasized that if they did not implement this program, then they had no other recourse of action other than "doing nothing." Councilor Hunt asked if the City's only involvement would be to grant permission for the USDA to do the trapping. Mr. Roy said that staff has agreed to check the traps daily but otherwise the Wildlife Service handled the trapping and disposal. He confirmed to Councilor Scheckla that the Service also provided the signs. He mentioned that staff would probably help them post the signs. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 5 Nis= 111111M 1101111=1 ME 111MIE111 Councilor Hunt asked about the traps. Mr. Wegner described the spring snare trap used by the USDA as the most appropriate trap for coyotes. He said that the Wildlife Service would place the traps on the identified coyote trail coming out of the park. He emphasized that the coyote trail was not the pedestrian trail. He stated that it was against the law to trap live coyotes and relocate them because of disease. He reiterated that coyotes could not be rehabilitated into pets any more than wolves or bears could be. Mr. Wegner said that this program was what staff felt was necessary to eradicate the coyotes. He referered to the leash law in the City; if a dog owner did not obey this law, then it was possible that a dog could be caught in the trap. He emphasized that no one should be in the area where the traps would be located. He reviewed the use of signs to warn people the closer they came to the area of the traps. He explained that USDA took responsibility and the liability for the program. Mr. Monahan said that the issue was the potential for public outcry. He said that the USDA told them that while coyotes were everywhere, no one else has implemented the program. The Council would be standing alone. Councilor Patton commented that she would rather do that then face a family whose child was mauled by a coyote. The Council agreed. > COUNTRY DAZE Mr. Monahan informed the Council that the Country Daze parade organizers received $500 from the Country Daze account controlled by the Chamber but they needed additional funds to cover the costs of insurance and prizes. He said that they may attend the July 13 Council meeting to ask for $1,000. He reviewed the parade route starting and ending at City Hall or the Water Building. The Council authorized staff to allocate up to $1,000 to the Country Daze parade organizers. The Council indicated an interest in participating in the parade. > WASHINGTON COUNTY LAWSUIT Mr. Monahan advised the Council that the City of Tigard has been named in a lawsuit filed against Washington County with regard to "The Great Wall of Tigard," the wall built behind Bull Mountain Meadows. He said that Tigard was named because the petitioners were seeking an injunction against the City issuing any further building permits. He explained that this was an inverse condemnation claim against the County. > AGENDA REVIEW Mr. Monahan reviewed several changes to the agenda. He noted that Item #4 should read 1999/2000 budget, not 1998/1999 budget. He said that Mr. Roberts would like to change the ordinance in Item #8 from being effective in 30 days to an emergency ordinance so that they could build the path this year if they got all the permits. He reported that Mr. Petrie wanted to set Item #10 over to July 13. He mentioned that Troop 799 would lead the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. m Mr. Monahan advised the Council that Joe Taylor requested recall information. He mentioned that Mr. Taylor has testified about the Erickson Heights subdivision. ® Mr. Monahan informed the Council of the City of Sherwood's invitation to the Tigard Council and staff to attend their ethics training. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 6 ljm~mm~n-- MIERIM INS- ~E== ==J • Councilor Scheckla mentioned the three-minute report on the Tigard water issue broadcast on Channel 8 tonight. He said that the report included talking with both Citizens for Safe Water and H2OK. • Mr. Monahan announced that Jessie Lowman of the Tualatin Valley Water District was retiring on Friday, July 9. He asked the Council if they wanted staff to start sending mementos regularly to these retirees. • Mr. Monahan mentioned a request from a Tigard gymnastic organization asking the Council to participate in welcoming a group visiting from Germany in August. He asked if the Council wanted the staff to start getting involved in setting up these types of welcoming activities. The Council indicated yes. 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board Mayor Jim Nicoli called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton, and Scheckla were present. James Connor of Troop 799 led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.4 Council Communications 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA Staff reported that the 79 h Avenue plans would be ready on July 13. Mr. Duenas said that he would have a status report on the design. • Debra Margeson Ms. Margeson presented a petition in opposition to the Murdock Street extension. She asked that the study recommended by Gus Duenas focus on the cost effectiveness of the extension (feasibility versus cost). • Eric Margeson Mr. Margeson mentioned that he would like to see the land become a park. • Betty Banford Ms. Banford reviewed the involvement of the neighborhood in opposing the Murdock Street extension, beginning with learning of the potential extension at the Erickson Heights subdivision hearings. She concurred that the neighborhood wanted the area to be part of the existing park with bicycle and pedestrian connectivity (as opposed to vehicular connectivity). She mentioned concerns with regard to the increased traffic volumes from the apartments. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 7 Mayor Nicoli explained that the Council had to implement the State of Oregon and Metro land use laws or face a rewrite of their local land use laws by the State. He referenced threats made by ODOT, Metro and the Land Conservation and Development Commission to force cities to comply with their laws and regulations. He said that the State required local jurisdictions to maximize connectivity in the cities. He pointed out that the type of request the neighbors have brought forward asked the Council to contravene the land use laws. Mayor Nicoli mentioned that lately the Council has received numerous requests from citizens who did not want their streets improved or put through. He reiterated that the Council had limited control on what they could do about it because of the local, Metro and state land use laws. He remarked that the Council found this a difficult situation to deal with, and one which they knew upset people. Mayor Nicoli discussed the City's work to upgrade the safety of City streets, especially those serving schools. He mentioned the Transportation Task Force currently looking at upgrading the sidewalks on streets in the vicinity of a school. He said that the Council would not ignore the neighbors' petition but it was a difficult request for the Council to deal with because they did have only minimal leeway in the connectivity issue. Ms. Margeson said that the neighbors understood and appreciated the Council's position. She explained that their objection was not based on wanting the City to put the street through but rather on the safety concerns inherent in a narrow, winding street that could not be widened enough to allow two way traffic to pass in both directions. She argued that extending the street for connectivity made no sense if the cars could not safely use the street. Mayor Nicoli mentioned that the Council stood firm in the face of neighbor objections in requiring the connection of neighboring streets with the new streets in the Erickson Heights subdivision. He explained that those neighborhoods asked the Council to hook up all the through streets in the area as a matter of fairness. He said that Murdock Street was mentioned in that discussion. He stated that the City would not put a street through without thoroughly studying the entire length of the street. He commented that he did not know when the City would move on the project. Councilor Moore described the open process used by the City that provided opportunities for citizen input. He pointed out that the Murdock Street neighbors would not be the only citizens involved in the project. He said that, at this time, the Council has given no direction to staff to move forward. He emphasized that it was a long process. 9 Mr. Margeson asked that the City use the area for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity instead of n vehicular connectivity. Ms. Banford spoke to using the entire area outside the Water District „ fence as a neighborhood park instead of turning 20% of it into a street. She agreed with improving or moving the existing pathways through the area. Mr. Margeson pointed out that the street would remove one-third of the natural tree grove. Luther Stowe, 791' Avenue neighbor C1 Mr. Stowe registered his and his neighbors' concerns regarding the improvements to SW 79m Avenue. He said that while they appreciated the improvement and safety enhancements, they did not want to see the street significantly widened or altered in ways that would increase the speed limit. He mentioned concerns with regard to safety and LID costs. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 8 111111111 E111=1111 ENE • Ed Ivey, Murdock Street Mr. Ivey stated that he has lived at the top of the hill since 1973. He explained that the loss of most of the trees on the hill over the past 20 years motivated the neighbors in their fight to retain the few trees remaining in a park. He said that SW 1090' (being a steep hill) was a poor connectivity street. He stated that the neighbors on Calloway Hill received no notice of the Erickson Heights subdivision. He agreed that some of the natural paths needed to be upgraded so that the kids did not walk through private property. He suggested that the Boy Scouts or a similar organization undertake that project. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Duane Roberts, Associate Planner, verified to Councilor Hunt that Item 3.6 was reimbursement for expenditures already authorized by the Council (the Cache Creek property). Councilor Hunt asked if the resolution outlining the use of the greenspaces money for the Fanno Creek Trail corridor would allow use of the money for other trails, such as behind City Hall or down by the Tualatin. Mr. Roberts said that they would have to modify the resolution to allow use of the money on other trails. Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Patton, to approve the Consent Agenda* Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted "yes.") [5-0] 3.1 Receive and File: a. Tentative Agenda b. Council Calendar 3.2 Approve Tualatin Valley Cable Access (TVCA) Public, Education and Government (PEG) Access Franchise Fee - Resolution No. 99-40 3.3 Approve Budget Adjustment No. 11- Receipt of Northland Insurance Company Funds $450,000 - Resolution No. 99- 41 3.4 Approve Appointments of Liz Newton and Dee Wise as Deputy City Recorders - Resolution No. 99- 42 3.5 Declare the Need to Acquire Property for the Improvement of Certain Streets within the Boundaries of the 69`h Avenue Local Improvement District - Resolution No. 99-43 3.6 Amend the Intergovernmental Agreement with Metro for Pass-Through of Greenspaces Funds - Resolution No. 99-44 4. PUBLIC BEARING - 1999-00 USES OF STATE REVENUE SHARING a. Mayor Nicoli opened the public hearing. b. Declarations or Challenges: None c. Summation by Staff Cyndi Turner, Acting Finance Director, explained that the City of Tigard was eligible to receive state revenue sharing and has met the requirements for doing so. She indicated that there had been no public testimony at the Budget Committee's May 24, 1999, public hearing. She said that the budget anticipated the $205,000 of state revenue sharing in the general fund. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 9 d. Public Testimony: None e. Recommendation by Finance Director Ms. Turner recommended that the Council elect to receive state revenues. E Council Questions or Comments g. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing h. Consideration by Council: e RESOLUTION No. 99-45 - A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY OF TIGARD PROVIDES SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR THE STATE SHARED REVENUES Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt Resolution No. 99-45. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton, and Scheckla voted "yes.") [5-0] m ORDINANCE NO. 99-16 - AN ORDINANCE DELCARING THE CITY'S ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Patton, to adopt Ordinance 99-16. The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton, and Scheckla voted "yes.") [5-0] 5. PUBLIC HEARING -1999-00 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET a. Mayor Nicoli opened the public hearing. b. Summation by Staff Ms. Turner reviewed the budget process resulting in the Budget Committee's recommendation of the $50,176,950 budget before the Council. She mentioned an operating budget increase of 12.8%, an increase of 9.69 positions over last year, the $86,000 included for Y2K ready preparedness expenditures, big ticket capital purchases for new and replacement equipment, and ADA facility improvements. She explained that the general CIP budget of $315,000 included a carry over of $156,000. She mentioned the $19,693,800 CIP project budget. c. Public Testimony: None d. Recommendation by Staff Ms. Turner recommended adoption of the improved budget. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 10 Jill 11111gli,11111111 111 11 J .e. Council Questions or Comments Ms. Turner confirmed to Councilor Scheckla that the budget did include the Council pay raise. Councilor Scheckla stated that he would vote "no" on the budget because he disagreed with the Council pay raises. E Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing g. Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 99-46 Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Resolution No. 99-46. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 99-46, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD APPROVING THE BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS, DECLARING THE AD VALOREM TAX LEVY AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS PROVIDED BY ORS 210.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/00. Motion passed by majority voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, and Patton voted "yes;" Councilor Scheckla voted "no.") [4-1 Mayor Nicoli thanked Gene Famstrom (in attendance) for chairing the Budget Committee this year. 6. PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STAFF REPORT Mr. Duenas mentioned the CIP budget process begun in March with the CITs. He said that staff has made some further changes since the Planning Commission's approval on May 17. He presented his report using graphics illustrating the projects in Streets, Parks, Sanitary Sewer/Storm Drainage, and Water. Mr. Duenas reviewed the street projects continuing from FY 1998-99, including the Gaarde Street design and right-of-way acquisition, the Walnut Street/Tiedeman Avenue realignment, the Lincoln Street improvements (a CDBG funded project), the SW 69`h Avenue LID, and the design for SW 79 Avenue. He noted the new projects for FY 1999-00, including the Burnham Street design and acquisition, the Maple Leaf Street and SW 715` Avenue design, and a traffic circulation study for the Murdock extension area (SW 109'h to SW 97d') to evaluate the connections needed in the area. Mr. Duenas stated that they were continuing the pavement major maintenance program and including county roads this year (paid for by the County). He mentioned developing a comprehensive traffic calming plan to look at neighborhoods instead of focusing on individual streets. Mayor Nicoli asked if the SW 79`'' Avenue improvements referred only to planning and design. Mr. Duenas said yes. He indicated that staff has already said two neighborhood meetings to get input from the neighbors. He said that staff did not want a freeway in the area either but they CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 11 111N111111111M 11111=1 MIN did have to follow design standards. He mentioned bicycle connectivity in the area. He said that staff was trying to incorporate all the necessary elements while still addressing the neighborhood concerns for safety. Mayor Nicoli asked in which budget was the Walnut/Tiedeman intersection improvement located. Mr. Duenas said that it was in the current year's budget but they were carrying the money forward to next year. He directed the Council to Appendix A for a comprehensive listing of the projects in the street system program. Councilor Scheckla asked why staff included SW 107`x' Avenue from Cook Lane to Park Street (a private street) in the pavement major maintenance program. Mr. Duenas explained that Council gave direction at a previous meeting for staff to proceed with the project, provided that the City acquired all the land. He said that the property owners have already dedicated the property and that staff was working with the City Attorney's office to get title to the remaining 25 foot strip of land that was never recorded (as it should have been). He stated that, as soon as the City obtained all the land, the street would become a public street. Mr. Duenas reviewed the changes made to the parks system program. He said that when staff redid the estimates for the boardwalks and bridges, they discovered that some segments cost quite a bit more than the original estimates had shown. He explained that staff decided to reschedule construction of the most expensive segment, the Woodward Park trail, to FY 2001/02. Mr. Duenas mentioned substituting the Fanno Creek restoration project and deleting the ineligible Cache Creek Park master plan. He noted the addition of the Summer Lake Park master plan update and the reallocation of some greenspace funding to supplement the trail project. He indicated that he included the Summer Lake bottom barriers in the hopes of completing the promise made to the residents. Mr. Duenas reviewed the sanitary sewer program projects. He said that they were continuing the sanitary sewer major maintenance program and the neighborhood/commercial sewer extension program. He noted the projects requested by the Public Works Department, including replacement sewer lines for Commercial Street and Bonita Road. He mentioned the need for sanitary sewer facility plan studies as part of creating a sanitary sewer public facility plan this summer. Mr. Duenas reviewed the storm drainage system program. He noted the projects they were carrying forward to next year, including the Lincoln Street drainage improvements, the SW 116' Avenue drainage improvements, the Washington Square/Cascade Blvd project (also listed in the Unified Sewage Agency's master plan), and the Summer Creek wetland restoration at SW 12151 Avenue. He mentioned the projects requested by the City maintenance people or coming out of land developments. Mr. Duenas reviewed the water system program projects. He noted the water projects done in support of road projects, such as the Walnut/Tiedeman intersection project, the County's Beef Bend/Elsner project, and the Lincoln Street improvements. He mentioned the distribution and transmission mains at North Dakota and 150th. Mr. Duenas asked the Council to approve the program with the recommended changes. PUBLIC TESTIMONY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 12 IN I Mayor Nicoli opened the meeting to public testimony. Kathy Sieger Mr. Sieger requested that the traffic circulation and feasibility study for the Murdock Street extension area include Kable Lane and Lady Marion by name. Mr. Duenas explained that those two streets were included within the project's defined boundaries, even though he did not list all the streets by name. Mayor Nicoli closed the public testimony. COUNCIL DISCUSSION Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Moore, to direct the City Engineer to proceed with the CIP. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted "yes.") [5-0] 7. INFORMATION PUBLIC HEARING FORMATION OF SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 13 SW 100TH AVENUE WEST OF INEZ Greg Berry, Engineering Department, stated that the reimbursement district would provide service to seven homeowners at the intersection of SW 100`n and west along Inez Street. He said that the estimated cost of $102,000 divided among the seven owners yielded a per owner cost of $14,640. He mentioned that staff proposed implementing the $8,000 cap, limiting those connecting within one year of the final approval of the engineer's report to an $8,000 cost. PUBLIC TESTIMONY Mayor Nicoli opened the hearing to public testimony. o Don Quinn Mr. Quinn stated that he opposed the formation of the district on the grounds that the plan should include lower Inez as well as upper Inez. He said that to hook up his line to SW 100' took 100 feet more line than hooking up to a line in Inez. He spoke to running a line up Inez from SW 98`h in order to pick up more people. He asked the City to send out a letter to the seven homeowners to see how many really wanted this district. He supported waiting and doing the whole thing at one time. Councilor Hunt asked if staff sent a letter out to the property owners. Mr. Duenas explained that staff has tried several different ways in the past to get sewer to this area. He said that most of the people on Inez Street did not want the sewer. Therefore staff dropped it because the intent of the program was to accommodate the people who wanted sewer. He stated that one of the property owners in this district has asked for sewer for many years. He indicated that when four out of the seven property owners indicated support for a sewer in response to letters, staff went ahead with the district. Brigitte Partington, Inez Street Ms. Partington said that she has lived here since 1971. She asked for clarification on how the CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 13 program worked to accommodate a few people while not impacting their adjacent neighbors. Mayor Nicoli explained that the City would put in the sewer line. The property owners paid nothing and owed nothing until they chose to hook up to the line. Councilor Scheckla pointed out that the longer a property owner waited to hook up, the higher the dollar amount would be (due to inflation). However if a property owner could wait for 15 years to hook up, then he/she did not pay the district assessment at all. Councilor Hunt noted that property owners hooking up within one year paid only $8,000 of the assessment. Mayor Nicoli explained that the intent of the program was to get as many people in the City hooked up to sanitary sewer as possible, including those pockets in the older parts of the City where the residents could not afford to bring sewer in on their own. He said that when half of the people in a neighborhood wanted sewer, the City installed it, financing it out of its own pocket. He mentioned that the requirements of the Endangered Species Act would probably push this program harder. Ms. Partington asked how the Endangered Species Act impacted sewers. Mayor Nicoli explained that, through a process called "non-point discharge," septic systems released sewage into the water table and it eventually ended up in the rivers. He said that the Unified Sewage Agency was looking at bringing all areas of the Tualatin Basin into compliance. He commented that USA would probably offer a similar sewer reimbursement district program to areas outside city limits. Ms. Partington argued that by the time the water from the drainfield got down to the water table, it was fairly clean. Mayor Nicoli pointed out that the problem was not with the discharge from an individual tank into the water table but with the large number of septic tanks that remained in the County discharging septic tank water into the water table. Ms. Partington asked if sometime down the road, the City might require the property owners to hook up to the sewer. Mayor Nicoli said that that was a possibility but noted that the federal government would instigate that requirement. Councilor Scheckla pointed out that Ms. Partington's septic tank water impacted the people below her on the hill. Ms. Partington said that someone would have to prove that to her. o Annette Marshall Ms. Marshall pointed out that half of the Inez people were in attendance. She asked how much the connection fee would be, in addition to the $8,000 district assessment. Mr. Duenas said that the connection fee was $2,335. Councilor Scheckla pointed out that if a property owner hooked up right away, the total cost was just over $10,000 (a savings of $5,000) whereas if he/she waited to hook up, the cost would be considerably more. Ms. Marshall asked if the costs would go down if the law mandated more people hooking up. Mayor Nicoli indicated that they might be able to save some money by combining several small projects but he was not certain that the costs would go down. Councilor Patton pointed out that frequently Congress passed unfunded mandates, requiring local governments to do something but not providing any money to do it. Councilor Scheckla noted that a house on sewer would sell more quickly than a house not on sewer. Councilor Moore asked what the cost would be to replace a septic tank system. Mr. Berry stated that in most of these areas, installing a replacement or new septic tank system was not a feasible option because of lack of space (it needed at least half an acre for the drain field) and the CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 14 BEER ME= III I difficulty of getting the equipment into the back yard. He mentioned the high ground water that would cause a new system to fail. s A gentleman in the audience said that the person who bought the old church house on SW Canterbury Lane two years ago paid between $8,000 to $10,000 to replace the septic system. ® A lady asked if they had to pay the $8,000 cap up front or could they pay it off in installments. Mr. Duenas said that the City's Finance Director has stated clearly that he was not in the financing business, and therefore the entire amount was due at the time of hookup. He recommended that the property owners obtain a loan. Janet McBride Ms. McBride asked what the cost would be per household if the district included the people on lower Inez. Councilor Moore said that those who hooked up within the first year would pay $8,000 no matter-which direction the sewer line went. Mr. Duenas confirmed that the assessment for a line in the other direction would be $8,000 to $9,000. Ms. McBride asked what the difference was if the people on lower Inez did or did not want sewer, if the environmental laws and the federal government would force them off septic tanks anyway. Mayor Nicoli pointed out that it was not yet law. He stated that USA would brief the Council on this direction shortly. He reiterated that the City tried to reach the neighborhoods in need of sewer that had 50% of the residents wanting to hook on. He explained that the money paid by those hooking on went back into the program to fund the sewer for another neighborhood. He stated that the City began with the older neighborhoods because they were at such a disadvantage in trying to hook on to sewer. Ms. McBride contended that the City did their street a disservice in allowing an improvement district just one street over because that gave the properties on one side of the street the opportunity to hook up to that district. She said that it was unfair because only one side of the street would pay for sewer down Inez. Mayor Nicoli referenced the $8,000 cap and the City eating the rest of the assessment as part of the fairness issue. Ms. McBride contended that they did not get much in their area for their tax dollars, as they did not have street lights or sidewalks either. She suggested that the City leave Mr. Quinn out of the district and allow him to connect to the other sewer when it was put in because his connection fee would be so much higher than everyone else's. Ms. McBride said that only one of the seven property owners was desperate for sewer while the rest just saw it as what happened if you bought a house with aseptic tank. She argued that the neighbors did not have a real choice because of the hammer held by the City - pay now or pay even more later. Councilor Moore pointed out that the City installing the sewer meant that it was available to the property owners in case of an emergency. Councilor Moore noted that Ms. McBride was listed as favoring the district. Ms. McBride said that she did not care one way or the other. She reiterated that only one side of the street had to pay for the improvement district. She suggested that the City make this a bigger district by going down the hill, since those people would have to go on sewer at some point anyway. Mayor Nicoli reiterated that, with the limited funds available to this program, the City went first to the neighborhoods with a 50% majority in support of sewer. He explained that this was a way for the City to maximize its investment while at the same time getting as many people on sewer CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 15 as possible. Mr. Duenas pointed out that this area at the top of a hill was one of the most difficult locations around. He said that only a limited number of people could be hooked on in a certain direction. • A gentleman asked what the costs were (beyond the $8,000 and the $2,300) to get from the street line to the house. Mayor Nicoli mentioned hiring a plumber to install the line and decommission the septic tank. He said that the City brought the lateral line to the property line. Mr. Quinn stated that it cost his neighbor on Pembroke $2,200 to install a 70-foot line to hook up to the sewer lateral. He alleged that the City designed this program to placate the one neighbor on the hill who has been trying to get sewer for years. Councilor Moore stated that he has not met the gentleman. He argued that alleging that the City did this program for one individual was ludicrous, citing the other neighborhoods put on sewer through this program before this neighborhood came up for consideration. Ms. Partington reiterated that the whole community should do the program at once, not just a few people. She asked if doing so would reduce the cost to something reasonable. Mr. Duenas said that the easiest installations cost between $6,000 to $8,000 with the more difficult ones costing much more. He confirmed that this neighborhood was one of the most difficult areas to sewer because it was on a hill. Mr. Duenas explained that the City could not extend a sewer line for miles and had to go with the one closest to the properties. In this case, the closet line was in SW 100'. He reiterated that the people on Inez indicated no interest in sewer. Councilor Scheckla asked Mr. Duenas about the Fairhaven Road district. Mr. Duenas said that more than half of the 29 homes in that district have hooked up. He reiterated that, after 15 years, the property owners did not have to pay the assessment, although they still had to pay the $2,359 connection fee. Councilor Scheckla pointed out that the connection fee could be considerably higher 15 years from now. Mayor Nicoli commented that he allowed this hearing to drag out because his experience indicated that if he dragged it out long enough, enough people would ask questions to allow the City to explain the situation fully. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Mr. Duenas recommended approval of the district. n o Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing N COUNCIL DELIBERATIONS Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Resolution No. 99- 47. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 99-47, A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 13. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 16 Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted in favor.) [5-0] S. PUBLIC HEARING - (QUASI-JUDICIAL) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT (CPA 1999-00001, SLR 1999-00003) The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 and 2SX102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. a. Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the public hearing. b. Declarations or Challenges There were no declarations or challenges. All members indicated that they were familiar with the application. c. Staff/Applicant Report Mark Roberts, Planner, pointed out that the City was the applicant in this proposal to construct five segments of the Fanno Creek Trail. He stated that the Tigard Street and SW Ash Avenue extension required a Sensitive Lands Review because it involved land form alterations in the 100 year flood plain. He said that this extension also required a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to remove 0.2 acres of affected wetland from the water resources overlay zone. Mr. Roberts said that the applicant demonstrated that the proposed development would not negatively impact the 100 year flood plain. He stated that the ESEE analysis provided by the applicant demonstrated that the economic, social and energy benefits of the trail outweighed the environmental consequences of losing a small portion of the wetlands. He indicated that the applicant has met the Sensitive Lands Review standards and the Metro Functional Plan Title 3 standards for a conditional use trail. He reported that on June 7, 1999, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval to the Council. d. Public Testimony: None e. Council Questions 1. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing g. Staff Recommendation Mr. Roberts recommended approval of the proposal with the conditions of approval as outlined in the staff report, and the amendment adding an emergency clause to the ordinance. h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 99-17 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 17 Motion by Councilor Bunt, seconded by Councilor Patton, to adopt Ordinance No. 99-17 with the emergency clause change. The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 99-17, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 99-00001, SLR 99-0003, AND TITLE 3 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW, REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted in favor.) [5-0] 9. FORWARD INITIATED BALLOT MEASURE TO WASHINGTON COUNTY ELECTIONS DIVISION FOR THE SEPTEMBER 21, 1999, SPECIAL ELECTION STAFF REPORT Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder, reported that staff found that the Citizens for Safe Water • group followed the necessary steps in submitting their petition to the Council. She said that the attached resolution forwarded the ballot measure requesting a Charter amendment with regard to a new section of the Charter, Section 51. She read the new section: "The City of Tigard shall not use the Willamette River as a drinking water source for its citizens unless the question of using the Willamette River as a drinking water source has been approved by not less than 50% of the voters voting in a city wide election." Ms. Wheatley stated that this special September election would cost the City approximately $16,764. Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Resolution 99-48. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 99-48, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD SUBMITTING TO THE VOTERS A PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE SEPTEMBER 21, 1999, SPECIAL ELECTION. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted "yes.") [5-0] 10. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR PACIFIC RIDGE TO USE CITY PROPERTY FOR PRIVATE WETLANDS MITIGATION Mayor Nicoli said that the applicant requested to withdraw this item. 11. WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION - REQUEST FOR FUNDING (Discussion continued from the 6/15/99 Council Meeting) Mayor Nicoli said that he was not yet ready to make a recommendation but hoped to be able to make a report next Tuesday. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 18 12. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS - None. 13. NON AGENDA ITEMS - None. ' 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Canceled. 15. ADJOURNMENT: 9:13 p.m. l Attest: Catherine eatley, City ReWer r, City o igard Date: r1 1AADhACATHY%CCMX990622.00C ' I I I I CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 - PAGE 19 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684.0360 Notice TT 9 4 3 h BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising ®City of Tigard ° E3 Tearsh 013125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 ° ❑ Duplice TUALATIhI The Ttialaun Summer Kids Tennis C>tmQ i ® scheduled to- Accounts Payable 21, through"June 25 at thu 'jhalatYn ;1 High 5cho611enms courts sib The sessions, fare kids $8~~ 7 fl 1 will be held. f in: o fo 10 a.r0- 'each H AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION day, with the sessions for kids ages,, . J 12-16 scheduied,>or 10 to'1'1 a ni: E STATE OF OREGON, ) , COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, lss. being first d& Y sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the Ti Bard-Tualatin ` i a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the City Counci 1 Meeting i a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for aNE successive and consecutive in the following issues: Tine 1 7 , 1 999 Subscribed and sworn to afore me, thig2 '7 a- t•, A a xx n f June, 19 9 9 I OFFICIAL SEAL ROBIN A. SUROM Nota ublic for Oregon NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: *COMMISSION NO. 062071 IAY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16, 2001 AFFIDAVIT - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) a ~f I, begin first duly sworn, on oath, depose ands That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number (s) which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated a-c-)- \qqq copy(s) art hereof, on the _ of said,, `o`rdinance(s) being hereto attached and by re rence made a p~~ day of 119 p~ 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Ball Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. Tigard Library, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 3. Tigard Water Department, 8777 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon Subscribed and sworn'to before me this Q'f"r~ day of n --4 WTO&SEA 4P Notary Pu is for Oregon n Expires. 5 -3 v c).3 spy My Commissio r iA2dm1joWffposLdoc CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 99-Uo~- AN ORDINANCE'DECLARING THE CITY'S ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1:Pursuant to ORS 221.770, the City hereby elects to receive state revenues for the fiscal year 1999-00. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature. by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after bei g read by number and title only, this (DDjxej day of , 1999. Catherine Wheatley, Cit Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of 1999. Ja Nicoli, Mayor Approved as to for i ttorne ~ Dat I certify that a public hearing before the budget committee was held May 24, 1999, and a public hearing before the City Council was held on June 22, 1999, giving citizens an opportunity to comment on the use of State Revenue Sharing. atherine Wheatley, City ecorder ~ a a J~q9 Dat ORDINANCE No. 99- Page 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 99- 1 -7 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 99-00001), SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR 99-00003), AND TITLE 3 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW, REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT FANNO CREEK, TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the City's Water Resources Overlay, Sensitive Lands Review, and Title 3 Conditional Use Review to construct sections of the Fanno Creek Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 1999, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the aforementioned land use applications, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval included in the attached Exhibit "A!'; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 1999, the City Council held a public hearing and approved the aforementioned land use applications, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval included in the attached Exhibit "A." NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all of the relevant criteria as noted in the attached Planning Commission recommendation to the Tigard City Council, also referred to as "Exhibit A." SECTION 2: The City Council approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Sensitive Lands Review, and Title 3 Conditional Use Review, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval as set forth in the attached "Exhibit A." SECTION 3: Because the prompt implementation of this ordinance is necessary to complete the construction of the Fanno Creek trail improvements during the current building season, ' an emergency is declared to exist, and this ordinance is effective upon its passage by the Council. ORDINANCE No. 99-J--2- Page 1 of 2 PASSED: By UrLWMOUS vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this,2D_L'_Oday o , 1999. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder rid APPROVED: By Tigard City Council thiQ day of 99. I ROW es Nicoli, ayor Ap roved as to form: Attorney as .mac e Date i:~ciWMdebrd\Fannotrail.ord.dot N ca a ORDINANCE No. 991-~- Page 2 of 2 Ban 09 'AGENDA ITEM N0: 2 -VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE : June 22,1999 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda Items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Manager prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. STAFF CONTACTED NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC -t ~ v YI D G~~ L D 47t~'( kzr~ Ajo T 7 4d&a,5?z--YW 4 9 ar , 6 L,- S Au WIN r AGENDA ITEM NO.4 DATE: June 22, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING -1999 - 2000 USES OF STATE REVENUE SHARING PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHEID.SHEETS AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 PLEASE PRINT Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (S kin Against) Neutral Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone NT Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 DATE: June 22, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING -1999 - 2000 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PLEASE PRINT Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) Neutral Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Nan r, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. s-¢Rdvv) r AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 DATE: June 22, 1999 PUBLIC CON! OIENT - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACKED SHEETS e, a i i i 3 r AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 PLEASE PRINT Proponent (S kin In Favor) O nent - (Speaking Against) Neutral Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Y,qT 4 Y S L. EE&ER 147;W ,3w )00`1 ~'7z24- Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. it i i i Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. now 13 v' AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 DATE: June 22, 1999 INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC BEARING - FORMATION OF SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 13 PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACKED SHEETS AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 PLEASE PRINT Proponent - (S kiwi In Favor) ® vent - (S A ainst) Neutral Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. DaN QvIIV N iy5-3 0 5. W, I b01;fq- 68~f - O~'66 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. N 1 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 DATE: June 22, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING - (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT EANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS N a a AGENDA ITEM NO. S PLEASE PRINT Proponent - (S loin In Favor) O neat - (S ]kin A amst) Neutral Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. i i Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. =mama Nils= - - - L9 0©1 06m14-9~ : 16'.3 43 Jam- --~"uC~j I ~ ~ ~ ~i ~YH • f TOY UaFeiasd,eicl+~!. `\hl' 1d44•pjWOpu, dR 97MIS . 91 raliiav, t ;~ftlali ~.NCdcI~lOdfAlet~' ; t.,~ _fi_t car ~ ~ ► ~ ~ . I L4 (o LA V,& k UP, ti 1 os ~ C het 41, NV, LCA.- i mill MINOR I M 11111 r5~ X02 OEM- ~fi~i~-99 • 16"43 2 4 (,~~,Q~l.••\ ije titD.forrstlsv •i•.;"~ ( ':~:14.Rooq ~ ~om-" ~ •AaW~'~,, Wi 9TH Lb' t Ep 1964. , . l S0~'A7V~ P'IDt S,r L.1 a ~/~i T - ~ 4~./~l' ~ rQS~T4A•Q49@ ASK ' . 94, US s^. ; ~ ~ 11 Jam"" c.~ c~ ~ w~- C-V CA- C. F k1c). 1 ~e. ~~d 06-14-99• 16:44 003 6-L4 0-1 Program in Germany 07/14 Arrival in Ulu- around.noon 07/16 Reception at the Lahr city hall (11.00 a.m.), city tour 07/17 Reception at the sports club Lahr (around noon), street party 07/20 Train to Stuttgart, State Capitol, Reception at the capitol. 07/21 6.00 p.m. B13Q at the Tretenho+f in Seelbach 07/22 Black Forest trip, "Vogtsbauerhoefe", peasant lunch, clock museum, waterfalls etc. 07/23 Visit of a Getman business in the morning. leaving for Paris at night 07/25 Late evening back from Paris 07/27 Trip to Rastatt and Baden- Baden, reception with the Sports orgLanization of the State, visit of the state training center 07/28 All day trip to the Europa Park (flan park) with the bus 07/30 Rehearsal in the citu park for exhibition, B'BQ in the evening 08/01 Matinee exhibition at the city park 08/02 Train trip to Freiburg, shopping, city tour toc, 08,103 Train trip to Strassbourg/France, shopping, city tour, invition to the European Parliament 08104 Leaving; for Portlan 6 5(j& Gtr o ~ ~ .06/15499 08:29 W03 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 0001 xxxxxxxxxxxsxxsxxxxxxxxxxxx xxa ACTIVITY REPORT xxx xxxxxxxxxx$xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 6565 CONNECTION TEL 503 684 3836 CONNECTION ID JIM NICOLI START TIME 06/15 08:27 USAGE TIME 01'55 PAGES 3 RESULT OK 06-14-'~9 16' qk% X01 ' i Awo ien tee. 1.- rtsw -03 q,--7 aa3 L~ . I II Uo l L>-~ w•.r~ I i c, 14V Jurr-19-99 10s57A Jim CcorliSS 503 5988363 P_01 ° &rI"? C', Ads- k = 0" AT law OIL ME Itm Lied M_ ir June 18, 1999 (!p Gv(he~~ 7 ~0~ 110-2__ ~~l'Gl City Council Members City of Tigard VIA FAX 598-8363 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or 97223 Dear Council: 1 received a copy of Greg Specht's letter to you dated today and I would like to clari fy and restate some points. Please recall my original request was to do exactly what Mr. Specht said they requested, to have "curb tight" sidewalks for the entire LID. Mr.Specht said they were turned down I assume because of this issue over Triangle Standards. My contention is the sidewalklstrcct tree Standards arc flawed and do not represent the opinion of the task force of which I was a member. I am glad the Council has agreed to review the Standards when they have time, but the issue at hand needs resolve be lore then. Mr. Specht said we had ample time to provide input, l agree. However I attended the first public meeting where Mr. DeHass and Mr. Duenas showed the plans. Those plans called for a curbside or "curb tight" sidewalk. Since the fbrmula for assessment discussed secured fair and we had executed anon-remcroslra-ice agreement, i had no reason to object to the plans. It wasn't until a few weeks ago when Mr. DeHass met with me to request a slope easement and to dedicate some property that i discovered the original sidewalk plan was changed. At that point 1 addressed the issue to the City Council. Every property owner i have spoken to would like a "curb tight" sidewalk. Mr. Dehass and Mr. Duenas have both said it is cheaper to build. It allows for friendly street parking without having to step into a planting area or hit car doors on street trees. At the same time a 6-lbot sidewalk is pedestrian friendly. Can you vision a family with a baby stroller + or an elderly person with a walker trying to navigate through the planter? The Triangle is not a residential area so the vast majority of the pedestrian trallic comes from cars that have to park somewhere. The standard for street side planter is fine for a street that does + not allow parking, but it is simply wrong to do so on a local street with parking. Specht + has said they are in favor of the "curb tight" plan but do not want to delay the 1.I13 or to increase the cost. I restated their concern to you at both council sessions. At the last session Staff was directed to get cost estimates to just address the sidewalk I placement adjacent to our property. 1 received a call from Mr. DeHass who was directed to look at alternatives like a meandering sidewalk where cut and 51,1 areas border our property. While some meandering sidewalks arc attractive, I don't think it is appropriate as a general design where street parking is allowed unless it is minor and done to preserve trees. fircfiaH is taNY twain rntrccrrr" "satis 12000 ti.«'. 60h rlvc•. • P-0-13ox'23970 • Tigard, Ort-Wil 97281-3970 s (5o fsaS}-11::1 ~ I'11N (503) 59M 8368 MENOM Jun-19-99 10:57A Jim Coriiss 503 5998363 P_02 No one wants to delay the project. if the council has the power to approve a modification to the placement o C street trees and sidewalk, I don't believe that there would be a delay. Again our intent is not to cause problems or to delay the LID. Our intent is to get it correct R)r what we believe arc the right reasons. Staft'has-already varied from the Standards as it pertains to the Sidewalk si7& and the requirement for groundcovcr planting in the planting area instead of bark dust. That being the case it seems reasonable that the sidewalk/street tree placement modification could be accomplished in the same manner at a lesser cost and not delay the LID. Irthe issue can't be resolved then the solution proposed by Staffseems to be a keystone wall along the cut and fill areas oi'our property at an estimated cost of $10,000, most of which would not be needed with a "curb tight" plan. Properly done it is a solution to our topography issues, however it is not the right solution tier the right reason, that being to make the local street usable to both pedestrians and vehicle uses. F wanted to try to clarify some of the issues in ease 1 can't be represented at your L uesday meeting. I will be out of town until Wednesday evening. Iryou have questions please try calling my wile, Cora, at home 639-9630. Thank you again ror your understanding of our concerns. Sincewiy, Jim C:orliss C: Greg Speeht Bill Monahan Dehlaas and Assoc. MA COYOTE COMPLAINT LIST TO CITY OF TIGARD Laurel Kirschbaum Copper Creek Drive 684-5440 5-4-99 Barbara Smith Riverwood Lane 684-4041 6-2-99 Susan Cannon 16240 Copper Creek Drive 684-3762 6-3-99 Linda O'Donnell 16325 Copper Creek Drive 684-0316 Donna. Farlow Serena & Durham Rd. 624-3932 6-9-99 Nancy Rodacker Copper Creek & Woodcrest 620-7389 6-18-99*(Cat killed) Although this is the list of citizens that I spoke with personally, I did receive a few voice mail messages on sightings that did not leave names or hone numbers. These sightings were located in the approximate area of Kent Ct. & 108 , 1080'& Durham Rd. I myself and other park staff members have seen coyotes between the Waverly subdivision and Cook Park in the last month or two. Complaints received by USDA Wildlife Services from 1 October 1998 to present. 22 coyote complaints received from Tigard citizens. .14 leaflets mailed or handed out to Tigard citizens. Reported damage to Wildlife Services 16 coyote complaints for human, health and safety 6 complaints for incidences of coyote predatory behavior towards dogs or cats. -11MIJ ~~~~~lY ~lnlr I y i ~NI) ~T ~4 JUN-23-99 07:45 ABM USDA.WILDLIPE SERVICES 503 399 5613 P.02 A , IBM V V I STEEL TRAPS OR SNARES NAME BEEN SET IN THIS IMMEDIATE AREA FOR THE PROTEC- TION F LIVESTOCK ANDIOR PROPERTY.. WILD ANIMALS CAPTURED IN THEM ARE THE PROPERTY F THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND COOPERATORS. PETS SHOULD RE DEPT ON A LEASH OR UNDER CLOSE SUPERVISION TAMPERING WITH TRAPS, SNARES OR THIS SIGN IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEAL'T'H INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES t COOPERATING WITH ' OTHER FEDERAL, STATE, AND COUNTY AGENCIES PRIMATE ORGANIZATIONS c ~ ~~lvrs Che Addresses: City of Tigard Mayor Jim Nicoli Councilor Paul Hunt Councilor Brian Moore Councilor Joyce Patton Councilor Ken Scheckla The attached petition to the City of Tigard contains signatures of our neighbors who are opposed to extending Murdock Street between 103rd and 106th. This petition began circulating just after we learned, quite by accident at a City Council meeting in January of this year, that the City was looking at this extension apparently as part of a compromise between the neighbors and developers of the Erickson Heights Subdivision. Our neighborhood has been actively writing letters, attending all the `proper' meetings, and speaking with the appropriate City staff members, as well as City Councilors, to express our concerns. The City's Master Park Plan has, in the meantime, been approved designating the Canterbury Water District unused public property as a proposed neighborhood park. We have a hard time understanding why the City would want to waste any of the precious land they have available for the proposed park by putting in a street that would do nothing for neighborhood identity or livability. We note that a neighborhood park is intended to be within walking distance to the area being served. Nonetheless, ample parking already exists along the surrounding streets. The Transportation System Master Plan even states that planning should be done to DISCOURAGE automobile traffic and ENCOURAGE pedestrian and bicycle modes of travel. We believe a pedestrian path connecting SW 103rd and SW 106th would provide a more desirable mode of `connectivity', would enhance the value of the proposed park, and would be accomplished at a considerably lesser expense. Many residents of this large neighborhood have been using this public land as a haven for enjoying nature, a safe place for children to play, an occasional picnic, walking dogs, and for a short reprieve from automobile traffic for many years. We are committed to opposing the further removal of the `natural' trees and park-like atmosphere which can not really be justified by the `connectivity theory' being used by street proponents. We urge all of you who have not personally visited this area to do so, and we are sure you will see why we are so opposed to putting yet another street through a residential neighborhood. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD OBJECTIVES We would like to see the area of the neighborhood park maximized by using the undeveloped portion of the Water District property and the area that is within the public right-of-way utilized as part of the park. We support the City's proposal to develop a Master Plan or Concept Plan for this neighborhood park, and wish to participate fully in that process. IBM We support the development of a pedestrian, rather than vehicular, connection from 103rd to 106th street, formalizing the pedestrian trails that have been used for years through this property. We support enhanced pedestrian accessibility and safety throughout the neighborhood, and especially along school-age children routes to Templeton and Tuality Schools. We do NOT support connecting 103rd and 106th with a full public street. We see it as a loss of what little public park land and trees exists in this neighborhood, unnecessary as a vehicular traffic transportation link, a waste of limited public funds, and a degradation of the neighborhood. i V~4ca A, PETITION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD We, the undersigned, being concerned citizens against the proposed Murdock extension project, request that the City of Tigard not extend Murdock Street from 106th to 103rd Streets. We believe such an extension to be a detriment to the neighborhood and will introduce a new safety hazard for our school children. We also believe the City of Tigard should consider the morality, as well as the legality, of the extension of Murdock to placate and expedite the development of the Erickson subdivision. NAME j~ ADDRESS 1. 4 O S. w~ 4 3. X1JAf;AV1AJ, /19 d 3 a 50 Ao Inc 4. U LQJ /U 5 S40 6. /y 4i ~OU4-y 7. suz s. II{IS5 3U.) 1041"- AV.E 10. ,/~4~. y /1-6, 3 s ~5 lL~ Cep ~U 11. Lwu- Xwo' - /K ilegAA (q ~f 0 8 S w /0~ f~ U~~ Yd , AC 12. 1 GG~ ~t+-r7'~-tom-- ! ~o S lc.~ /v c D 13. . 73 /`n o d rZ- 14. .,j4s;~ /L9 lvrlS4JAlall!LZzK' T/6f►2o D 15. 16. \V ~//t%Y~L~ ► 4 8 a5 S lti I 1 Gt T i [~vt.~ D 17. 18. 1lG~G`7 r!~ A'ic 19.-' ~ t, GZL ~d ~I CL~ C~?, 20. i06,y 5- 7,r d s' D.Jy S 1 1-18 7 0 - IOS 61 ~ ~l ~f~rDr~ ceC s7 cl J 3-(k tl l V 9'6,5-- s w t o 3 ate, 33 ~~3s ~w row 4~ - 3 J.,37- 14. oq V 3 - ° Cao 5w r0~ rL~ 34 ~,w r a k~yeoo 3 g L C2, (~-6'.1,a / D / S S 5 w /1-t cam' o 57~ . T col ~ q 5 ,I / i. J Its LG_~ ~ r /0Jm-- 46 N~Va r - 77,7-0. _ W..._cLrd a_CA_..S_ coo 14'2(QS SIL,3 (C) - G Z .o (o 0 70 51u / o ar,~j3ac( 57= D,Q cl 7 zz - - - - (oq. . I. Z. 5 LJ ~'?1u X21 Ic 5 f 1 c17ar. 66 -sw/ ifi-ja6k St 7;' a✓'~ ~f'f"~Z2~/ 16 Z. or 'i coq WlLO Ss U3 lool'h - - - - ----~~4A¢D.- 9ZZ24 ai) ~a. Tµ 1 Gl-- -.0 M 11111 PETITION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD We, the undersigned, being concerned citizens against the proposed Murdock extension project, request that the City of. Tigard not extend Murdock Street from 106th to 103rd Streets. We believe such an extension to be a detriment to the neighborhood and will introduce a new safety hazard for our school children. We also believe the City of Tigard should consider the morality, as well as the legality, of the extension of Murdock to placate and expedite the development of the Erickson subdivision. NAME ADDRESS Oh poAlE Pbg V 6,:3 q- q 27- o 6. 441-A - S~- r I L p 1 G 20 b 5 w PI n -7 7 f -7 by y0c. s"s ~a 3: C. 2.4-03~~-S 8~ b SS(-- l(~1~~durt.Fz~n,~ ~2 a.o - ? S~ r, 5 Sup l d~ 10 A/ - GAS ` 60 e- 53 7 ffiKSS s w roc--6 4ue 49f-7 91 If q; Z41WU n_ 1+0.25 SYV ID ~AALIE ``f f3(P~S a 0. q3- 101MINNOMM AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF 6/22/99 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE AD acili Compliance Update PREPARED BY: Loreen Mill DEPT HEAD OK LPV) CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Receive update on City's ADA Compliance for City buildings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Receive & file updated report. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Americans with Disabilities Act became effective 1/26/92 and extends federal civil rights protection in several areas to people who are considered "disabled". The act states its purpose as providing "a clear and comprehensive national mandate for elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities." The ADA prohibits the City from excluding people from jobs, services, activities or benefits based on disability. The ADA requirements were divided into five titles. This report to Council addresses requirements in Title II - Public Services & Transportation. This title prohibits state and local governments from discriminating against disabled people in their programs and activities. This title also requires cities to conduct self evaluations, name an ADA coordinator, adopt a grievance procedure, develop transition plans for structural changes, provide program accessibility with non-structural changes, and take affirmative steps to ensure accessible communications. On January 26, 1993, the City published its first ADA self evaluation and transition plan. The City has been implementing this plan since that date. In 1998 & early 1999, the City conducted a second self evaluation to make sure that Tigard's existing facilities and buildings achieve the ADA's purpose. Attached is a copy of the report highlights including: grievance procedures and the transition plans for each facility for structural and non-structural modifications. A copy of the full update plan is on file in the Tigard Public Library. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Take no action to comply with ADA regulations. Respond only on a complaint basis. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A FISCAL NOTES Dollar amounts are not known at this time except for the expenditure budgeted for 1999-2000 fiscal year which amount to approximately $103,725. j111jjj1mll~ 11111111 ®4 SELF-EVALUATION TRANSIT/®N PLAN Vp 4 Fa te. City of Tigard, Oregon June 22, 1999 x TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Numbers Introduction What is the ADA and why is an update to the City's Plan needed? i City's Statement of Compliance i Updated grievance procedure ii Compliance Reviews for Buildings City Hall/Police Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. CHP 1-36. City Hall Modular Units 13125 SW Hall Blvd. CHM 1-20 ➢ Library 13125 SW Hall Blvd. L 1-18 ➢ Niche Offices 8720 SW Bumham Street N 1-12 Water Building 8777 SW Burnham Street W 1-35 Leased House 9020 SW Bumham Street Bur 1-16 ➢ Public Works Offices & Shops 12800 SW Ash Avenue Ash 1-25 ➢ Senior Center 8815 SW O'Mara Street SC 1-29 9 Water Offices/Shop 10490 SW Canterbury Street Can 1-26 Compliance Reviews for Signage Building signage Sign 1-7 ➢ City HalUPolice Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. City Hall Modular Units 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Library 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Niche Offices 8720 SW Bumham Street ➢ Water Building 8777 SW Bumham Street ➢ Public Works Offices & Shops 12800 SWAsh Avenue ➢ Senior Center 8815 SW O'Mara Street Compliance Reviews for Parks ➢ Park Philosophy & Priorities All parks Pk 1 Park Facility Evaluation Summary All parks Pk 2-12 Transition Plan TP 1-12 (Listed by facility as noted under Compliance Review area) Appendix Architectural & Transportation Barriers Compliance Board ADAAG updated 1113138 Buildings & Facilities; State and Local Government - 36 CFR Part 1191 ➢ Architectural & Transportation Barriers Compliance Board ADAAG updated 1113198 Building Element Design for Children's Use - 36 CFR Part 1191 INTRODUCTION WHAT Is THE ADA? The American's with Disabilities Act of 1990, the ADA, was enacted on 712611990. The ADA extends to people with disabilities similar civil rights protections available on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex and religion through the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A person with a disability is an individual that has a physical or mental impairment that substantially 1knits a major life activity, has a record of such a disability or is regarded as having a disability. WHY 1S AN UPDATE NEEDED? All local governments must ensure that access to their programs, services and activities are conducted in such a way as to not discriminate against a person with a disability, as defined in the ADA. Title 11 of the ADA requires local and state governments to: conduct self evaluations, name an ADA coordinator, adopt a grievance procedure, develop transition plans for structural changes, provide program accessibility with non-structural changes, take affirmative steps to ensure accessible communication; and maintain and retain files about the ADA compliance efforts. The City of Tigard published its first self-evaluation & transition plan report on January 26, 1993. Since that time, the City has been committed to ensuring those programs, services and activities are provided in the most accessible way possible. The City desires to make sure structural changes previously identified have been completed, thus another self-evaluation for City buildings was done. The transition plan has been updated to identify the steps necessary to complete the modifications to buildings and a time frame for the needed modifications. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE FOR CITY OF TIGARD The City of Tigard is committed to the full and complete implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The City believes in the intent of the ADA, which is to remove the architectural, and attitudinal barriers that prevent equal access to programs, services and activities to people with disabilities. For this reason, the City has undertaken an update to its 1126133 ADA Self-Evaluation & Transition Plan to continue its efforts to remove barriers that prevent access. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE The City of Tigard has an ADA Coordinator and a grievance procedure in place. This is to ensure that complaints are handled promptly. Equitable resolution is strived for through the review process. Please contact the ADA Coordinator with questions or complaints about the ADA compliance efforts. The City's Grievance Procedure is on the following page. LOREEN MILLS, ADA COORDINATOR 93125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 VOICE OR - (503) 664-2772 TDD EMAIL- loreen ci.tigard.or.us i A®A GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE The City of Tigard has adopted a grievance procedure providing for prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action prohibited by the U.S. Department of Justice regulations implementing Title /I of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Complaints should be addressed to. Loreen Mills, ADA Coordinator, City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon, 97223 - (503) 639-4171 - TDD (503) 684-2772, who has been designated to coordinate ADA compliance efforts. 1. A complaint regarding access or discrimination should be filed in writing or verbally. It must contain the name and address of the person filing it, and briefly describe the alleged violation of the regulations. 2 A compliant should be riled within thirty days after the complainant becomes aware of the alleged violation. 3. An investigation, as may be appropriate, shall follow a riling of a complaint. The ADA Coordinator or designee shall conduct the investigation. This procedure anticipates informal but thorough investigations, affording all interested persons and their representative, if any, an opportunity to submit evidence relevant to the complaint 4. The ADA Coordinator shall issue a written determination as to the validity of the complaint and a description of the resolution, if any, within 30 calendar days. 5. If the complaint cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of the complainant by the ADA Coordinator, it shall be forwarded to the Hearings Officer. The City will retain the services of a Hearings Officer. The Hearings Officer shall establish ground rules or procedures for hearing complaints, requests, or suggestions from disabled persons regarding access to and participation in public facilities, services, activities, and functions in the City. The Hearings Officer shall hear complaints in sessions open to the public, after adequate notice, in an unbiased, objective manner, and issue a written decision within 30 calendar days of notification. 6. If the complaint can't be resolved to the satisfaction of the Complainant by the Hearings Officer, it shall be forwarded to the City Council. The Council at a public meeting shall hear the complaint. A determination shall be made within 30 calendar days from the date of the hearing. The decision of the City Council is final. 7. The ADA Coordinator shall maintain the riles and records of the City of Tigard relating to the complaints' filed. 8. The right of a person to a prompt and equitable resolution of the complaint filed, hereunder, shall not be impaired by the person's pursuit of other remedies, such as the filing of an ADA -complaint with the responsible federal department or agency. Use of this grievance procedure is not a prerequisite to the pursuit of other remedies. 9. These rules shall be construed to protect the substantive rights of interested persons to meet the appropriate due process standards, and to assure that the City of Tigard complies with the ADA and implementing regulations. 10_ Time lines referred to above concerning the scheduling of hearings may be extended if, after reasonable effort and justification, the hearing cannot bd conducted within the 30-calendar day limitation period. 11. All decisions shall be sent by regular mail to the complainant within 30 calendar days of the date of the hearing and shall be retained in the program rile. Phone notification shall also be made in cases involving visually impaired individuals. 12. The ADA Coordinator may modify this grievance and appeal process in order to assure equal access to programs, services and activities for people with disabilities. 13. Nothing in this grievance process is meant to be used for any personnel, EEO, or labor agreement grievance procedure for the City of Tigard. Contact the City of Tigard Human Resources Department for further information regarding Title 1 grievances. U PARKS AIWA IMPROVEMENTS The City of Tigard developed its philosophy for ADA improvements in the park/greenway areas and priorities for improvements within those areas. Following is a synopsis of the plan. ftmoSOPIIY AND PRIORITIES The City of Tigard Public Works Department is committed to the full and complete implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The Department believes in the intent of the ADA that is to remove the architectural and attitudinal barriers that prevent equal access to programs, . services and activities to people with disabilities. The Department will first focus its energy and resources on providing equal access to people with disabilities in our two community parks; namely Cook and Summerlake Parks. They offer the most well rounded set of services, facilities, and programs within our community. These parks are located on the north and south ends of the City and are within 2 miles of any location in the City. The Department will review its plan for greenways and natural areas. This work will begin first in the Fanno Creek Greenway due to its close proximity to the Library and Senior Citizens' Center and its heavy usage. Englewood Greenway will be next due to its existing uses and heavy patron use. No time line has been developed for this work. Finally, the Department will review its plan for neighborhood parks. Due to limited funds and the fact that very little activity is provided at these parks, it is anticipated that the City will provide access to parks at primarily the community park level. No time line has been developed for this work Community parks will have ADA modifications made on the following priority basis: • parking spaces • restroom access • playground access • picnic facilities • auxiliary services (i.e., sport fields, docks, fishing, tennis, concession stands, basketball courts, etc.) The plan will address existing structures, programs and services being brought into compliance with the ADA requirements and any new facilities to be built in compliance. TBIELU4E The City's_ self evaluatici vrill be conducted in two phases. During 1998, as a part of the development of the Parks Master Plan, a park facility evaluation was completed (see copy of report in this section). During the 1999-2000 fiscal year, an evaluation will be conducted to identify specific ADA needs in the parks. The Transition Plans for each park will be prioritized and developed during the fiscal year 2000-2001. Lmft/docs/ada/98-99/park philosophy.doc Pu ~ u CITY OF TIGARD - ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE APM 1. 1999 CITY HALL - Public access areas - includes City Hall lobby & public restrooms in Police lobby, Town Hall mom and Red Rock Creek conference room LOCA77ON17TEM RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED COST EST. Parking raise signs to correct height Property Manager 1998 DONE change fine amount ($300) Property Manager 1998 DONE • Curb Ramp $ 8,000 modify ramp Building Official at Lib. addition add handrails Building Official at Lib. addition • Public Restrooms - Men's & Women's door pressure Property Manager 1999 $ 10 sink faucet pressure Property Manager 1999 $ 10 relocate signs to latch side Property Manager 1999 $ 30 evaluate whether signs can be relocated, if not, to remain in place • Public Restroom (Women s) stall dimensions small Property Manager 1999-00 $10,000 • Public Restroom (Men's) back grab bar installed wrong Property Manager 1999 $ 100 stall lock not accessible Property Manager 1999 $ 100 • Public Counters lower counter Property Manager at major renovation unknown provide interim accessible table of City Hall • Town Hall . door pressure Property Manager 1999 $ 10 • Signage install correct signs Property Manager 1999-00 $1,500 (See detailed sign report) • Self Help Computer Table provide accessible table CD Director 1998-99 $ 200 • Emergency Alarms (Prior) install visual alarm system Property Manager 1999-00 $10,000 i • Building Emergency Evacuation Plan Risk Manager 1998 DONE i i 3 Lm/hAocs/ada/98-991CIty Hall.doc r_P I CITY OF TIGARD - ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE Andi 1, 1999 Modular Units behind City Hall - Employee Areas LOCATION11TEM RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED COST ESP • Parking provide a sign for accessible space Building Official at renovation $ 100 BMMIng 1 & 2 Building Official • Accessible Route decrease slope or add rails decrease slope of curb ramp to walkway (cungntly 11.5%) Modify existing handrails to comply Since modulars are temporary structures, City will not be spending $21, 000 to upgrade accessible route. Program access will be made by City staff meeting the public in another facility that is accessible. Building 1: Buildlna Inspectors • Restroom relocate seat cover dispenser Property Manger 1998-99 $ 25 • Hap Watkin's Office replace door hardware welever Property Manager 1998-99 $ 10 • Emergency Alarms install audible and visual alarms Property Manager 1999-00 $ 2,500 Interior Doors install accessible door hardware Property Manager 1999-00 $ 60 Building 2: Engineering Department • Interior Doors replace door hardware w4ever Property Manager 1999-00 $ 40 • Emergency Alarms install audible and visual alarms Property Manager 1999-00 $ 2,500 1-nVh:/docs/ada/98-99/City Hall Nlods.doo CITY OF TIGARD - ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE .April 1. 1999 UBRARY - Public access areas - Does not include workroom, lunchroom, behind ciro. desk, staff offices. LOCATION/ITEM RESPONSIBLE PANTY SCHEDULED COST EST • Entrance Doors door threshold < 112" Property Manager 1999-00 $ 250 bevel threshold Property Manager 1999-00 $ 250 • Public Restrooms reverse door swing (Prior) * replace back grab bars Property Manager 1998-99 $ 50 sink height (Prior) Head Librarian at renovation $ Z000 reduce door presgrare Property Manager 1998-99 $ 10 • Tables modify 5% of tables-height (Prior) Head Librarian 2000-01 Unknown • Signage restrooms & counters Property Manager 2000-01 $1,500 all other permanent rooms Property Manager 2000-01 $1,500 • Emergency Alarms install visual alarm system (Prior) Property Manager 1998-99 $10,000 * Fins Marshall will not approve access door swing modification. Police lobby restrnoms w,`I be mrda available to Library patrons who are unable to use Library restroorns. Lmlh:/docs/ada/98-99/Library.doc ~P3 CITY OF TIGARD - ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE April 1. 1999 POLICE DEPAR77WENT - Employee access areas - all areas other than lobby are employee access LOCATION/ITEM RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED COST EST. • Door Hardware - throughout install lever handles Chief of Police Remodel $ 1,500 • Interior Lobby door to employee area reduce door pressure Property Manager 1999-00 $ 10 modify maneuvering clearance Chief of Police Remodel unknown • Telephone (in lobby) Network Services Remodel unknown lower telephone & intercom install volume control • Signage all permanent rooms Chief of Police Remodel unknown • Emergency Alarms add visual alarms to system Chief of Police Remodel unknown • Counters (Police Records Window) lower counter Chief of Police Remodel Unknown (Interim provide accessible table) Chief of Police 1998-99 Unknown Lm1h:/docs/sda/98-99/Po11ce.doc . ~ J CITY OF TIGARD - ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE Aprtl 1. 1999 NICHE - Employee & Public access areas - downstairs, except lunchroom and in unimproved storage areas (Note: This building may be phased out for office use, thus access will be modified at major renovation. In the meantime, program access will be given by meeting the public downstairs when necessary.) LOCAT/ONWTEW RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED COST EST. • Accessible Route bevel transition and repair Property Manager 1998-99 $ 200 • Interior provide 2nd floor access via elevator Property Manager at renovation $50,000 • Parking DONE provide second accessible space Property Manager 1998-99 raise signs Property Manager 1998-99 change fine ($300) Property Manager 1998-99 • Restroom relocate seat cover dispenser Property Manger 1998-99 $ 20 replace sink with accessible space Property Manager at renovation $ 500 • Training Room replace door hardware Waver Property Manager 1998-99 $ 20 • Emergency Alarms raise visual alarm 3" Property Manager at renovation $1,000 • Signage Replace Network Services sign Property Manager 2000-01 $ 25 with braille sign & raised letters Replace two rear exit signs Property Manager 2000-01 $ 50 with braille sign & raised letters Lm/h:/docs/ada/98-99/N1che.d0c -TP5 CITY OF TIGARD - ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE April i. 1999 WATER BUILDING - Public and Eml2lQm s gees erea~s LOCAT/ON11TEM RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED COST EST. • Accessible Route & Parking $30,000 modify sloped walk from public walk Property Manager 2000-01 replace public walk curb ramps Property Manager 2000-01 van stripping Property Manager 2000-01 replace parking curb ramps Property Manager 2000-01 • Restrooms (Public) $ 5,000 door swing pressure reduced Property Manager 1999-00 reconfigure stalls to specifications Property Manager at renovation unknown change stall lock location Proper ty Manager at renovation unknown lower coat hook or Install 2nd hook Property Manager 1999-00 relocate flush control in woman's rm. Property Manager 1999-00 sink lever faucet pressure Property Manager 1999-00 sink height Property Manager at renovation unknown lower urinal flush control Property Manager 1999-00 unknown • Restrooms (Employee) Employee restrooms are Inaccessible. Employees will use public restrooms if accommodation is needed. • Drinking Fountain hi-low fountain Installed Property Manager at renovation $1,000 Interim paper cup dispenser (2 ea.) Property Manager 1998-99 $ 40 • Counters lower a portion of counter Property Manager at renovation $5,000. Interim - lobby table & chairs Finance Director 2000-01 $ 800 • Signage parking Property Manager 1999-00 $ 100 restrooms & counters Property Manager 1999-00 $ 400 all other permanent rooms Property Manager 1999-00 $ 300 auditorium listening system info. Property Manager 1999-00 $ 200 • Auditorium assistive listening system Property Manager 1999-00 $1,000 no ramp for raised stage area Property Manager N/A N/A stage used as storage area - no public access needed. • Emergency Alarms Install visual alarm system Property Manager 1999-00 $15,000 N 5 Lm/h:/docs/ada/98-99lWater-Bumham.doe r CITY OF TiGARD - ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE Am# 1, 1999 LEASED HOUSE AT 9020 SW Burnham SL Note: This building is planned for demolition for future right-of-way needs. The cost is high for ADA modifications and long term use of the building is not planned. Currently Interfaith Outreach Services leases the building. That lease expires 5/30199. If the building is leased to a non-profit service organization after that date or used for City of Tigard storage needs, the building will not be modified since program access can be made available without modifications. If the building is leased to a for-profit organization or used for Co of Tigard employees to receive the public, modifications will need to be accomplished to bring site into ADA Compliance. LOCATION11TEN RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED COST EST • Accessible Route Property Manager at renovation $50,000 when sidewalk is constructed an accessible route will need to be connected to the accessible entrance • Parking provide one disabled space/ van stripping reduce transition to >114" . Ramp Property fWanager at renovation $10,000 modify ramp to decrease slope install handrails • Entrance Property Manager at renovation $3,000 install accessible door hardware bevel door threshold • Interior Doors Property Manager at renovation $Z000 install accessible door hardware • Restroom (1 to ADA standards) Property Manager at renovation $15,000 replace door to make accessible reconfigure to specifications relocate sink install grab bars sink pipes wrapped sink lever faucet pressure lower mirror lower dispensers • Drinking Fountain Property Manager at renovation $5,000 hNow fountain installed Signage Property Manager at renovation $ 1,500 va parking y, restrooms E-+ all other permanent rooms • Emergency Alarms Property Manager at renovation $5,000 install visual alarm system • Misc. Equipment Property Manager 1999 $ 25 Fire Extinguishers are 72" above floor, lower Lm/hAoca/ada/98-99/House 9020 Sumhom.doc CITY OF TICARD - ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE A2al 1. 1999 IC WORKS • Public and ®rnalovea aces areas LOCAVON/1TLclb1 RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED COST EST. • Accessible Route sidewalk from street to bldg. Property Manager When public $20,000 sidewalk is built M • Parking - accessible stalls $ 200 remark proper dimensions Property Manager 1998-99 raise signs/change fine amt Property Manager 1998-99 • Entrance (Public) bevel door threshold Property Manager 1999-00 $ 200 • Interior Accessible Route Install handrail on both sides of stairs Property Manager 1999-00 $ 1, 000 Install ramp or elevator Property Manager at renovation unknown • Lunchroom replace sink faucet Property .Manager 1998-99 $ 200 lower phonelnstall volume control Network Services 1999-00 $ 300 • Restroom - (Women's) and Public Unisex door clearance only 4" on pull side Property Manager 1999 $ 100 wrap pipes Property Manager 1999 $ 25 raise sink Property Manager 1999-00 $ 200 replace toilet seat Property Manager 1999 $ 50 reconfigure stall to specifications, Property Manager 1999-00 $3,000 • Restroom (Men's) wrap pipes under sink Property Manager 1998 $ 25 raise sink Property Manager 2000-01 $ 200 reconfigure stall to specifications Property Manager at renovation unknown • Drinking Fountain paper cup dispenser-interim Property Manager 1998-99 $ 20 hNow fountain installed Property Manager 1999-00 $1,000 • Emergency Alarms install visual alarm system Property Manager 1998-99 $ 5,000 I * Since extending handrails into lobby and upper landing areas create safety hazards with the current building design, a major remodel would have to be undertaken. During the interim, stab` will accommodate by meeting visitors downstairs when needed or relocating staff downstairs. Currently, Men's restroom is unable to be modified for accessibility without major renovation. Until that happens, the Women's restroom will be made accessible and used for women staff members and any of the public who wish to use a unisex, accessible restroom rather than the men's restroom which is some what inaccessible. Lm/h:/docs/ada/98.99/Pub11c Works-Ash.doc `TPA CITY OF TIGARD -ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE AAriI 1. 1999 SENIOR CENTER - Public access areas - all areas are considered public access except equipment/control rooms & kitchenAvork rooms LOCATION17TEM RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED COST EST. • Accessible Route - provide route from public sidewalk . Property Manager when public $ Unknown no sidewalk traffic at this time with transit service lack of public transit service available to sidewalk • Parking $ 1,000 replace curb ramp from sidewalk Property Manager 1999 crosswalk from parking space Property Manager 1999 (with detectable warnings) install ADA sign in rear parking Property Manager 1999 restrip access aisle Property Manager 1999 replace fine amount on sign Property Manager 1999 raise sign Property Manager 1999 • Entrance Doors bevel front door threshold Property Manager 1999-00 $ 400 bevel rear door threshold Property Manager 1999-00 $ 600 • Elevator bring into compliance w/new ADA guidelines Properly Manager 2000-01 $10,000 • Public Restrooms - Men's in Lobby $ 500 reduce door pressure Property Manager 1999-00 relocate toilet paper dispenser Property Manager 1999-00 replace stall door lock Property Manager 1999-00 relocate seat cover dispenser Property Manager 1999-00 install accessible coat hook Property Manager 1999-00 wrap hoWlaste water pipes Property Manager 1999-00 lower paper towel dispenser Property Manager 1999-00 install additional soap dispenser Property Manager 1999-00 • Public Restrooms - Women's in Lobby $ 200 reduce door pressure Property Manager 1999-00 relocate seat cover dispenser Property Manager 1999-00 relocate toilet paper dispenser Property Manager 1999-00 • Sink areas - main hal0basemenUcraft room $ 200 lower towel dispensers Property Manager 1999-00 • Phones $ 1,000 basement phone lowered Network Services 2000-01 provide volume controls Network Services 2000-01 • Public Restrooms - men's & women's downstairs Can't comply with modifications. At renovation 1 uni-sex restroom will be constructed Property Manager At renovation $ 5,000 Lm/h:/docs/ada198-991Sen1or Center.doc R CITY OF TIGARD - ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE April 1. 1999 SENIOR CENTER - Public access areas - CONTINUED - all areas are considered public access except equipment(control rooms & kitchenAvork rooms LOCATION11TEM RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED (FYI !COST EST. Condnued - Public Restrooms downstairs lobby restrooms will be made available to building users who are unable to use basement restrooms. Short-term solution to most users can Access downstairs restrooms follow. door swing reversed Property Manager not scheduled not done"' reduce door pressure Property Manager 1999-00 $ 50 relocate paper dispenser Property Manager 1999-00 $ 50 • Coat racks some racks/hooks lowered Senior. Cntr. Director 2000-01 $ Unknown • Tables modify some tables-height Sr. Cntr. Director upon request $ Unknown • Signage provide accessible signs Property Manager 2000-01 $ 1,000 • Emergency Alarms Review & identify changes needed Property Manager 2000-01 $ N/A Modify existing system with visual Property Manager 2001-02 $ Unknown Fire Marshall will not approve door swing modification. Thus, upstairs Lrt1h:/docs/ada/98-99/Senior Center.doc ~-T P o ~ CITY OF TIGARD - ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE Aori/ 1. 1999 WATER DISTRICT BUILDING Canterbury Street Site, Public and Employee Areas (Note: This plan assumes no space leased to another organization and site used for City storage only.) LOCAT/ON/ITEM RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED COSIEST. • Accessible Route Property Manager at renovation $10,000 sidewalk from parking area curb ramps • Parking Property Manager at renovation $ Z000 provide. one disabled space & van stripping • Entrance Property Manager at renovation $3,000 install accessible door hardware bevel door threshold • Interior Property Manager at renovation $9,500 rebuilt walkway ramp, level landing, & handrails • Restroom Property Manager at renovation $15,000 replace door to make accessible reconfigure stalls to specifications remove/reconfigure shower stall relocate sink install grab bars sink pipes wrapped sink lever faucet pressure lower urinal lower dispensers • Interior Doors Property Manager at renovation $ 750 provide accessible door hardware • Signage Property Manager at renovation $1,000 parking restrooms all other permanent rooms • Emergency Alarms Property Manager 2000-01 $5,000 install visual alarm system Lm/h:/does/adN9a-ggMater-Canterbury.doc -~r P I 11 11 1 IN I 1 1; f CITY OF TIGARD - ADA COMPLIANCE UPDATE April 1. 1999 CITY WIDE CURS CUTS LOCATION17TEM RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED COST EST. • DESIGNICONSTRUCTION Response will be on a compliant-made basis Determine requirements City Engineer 2000-2003 Unknown Determine action & schedule City Engineer Unknown PARKS MAID GREENWAYS - City Wide LOCATION/ITEN RESPONSIBLE PARTY SCHEDULED COST EST. • PARKS -identified by park Determine requirements Grounds Supervisor 1999-2000 $ 7,500 Determine action & schedule Public Works Director 2000-2001 Unknown • GREENWAYS - identified by greenway area Consideration will be given for access, slopes, etc. at the time of greenway development * upon first task being accomplished t.Whidocs/ada/98-99/curb cut & parks.doc AGENDA ITEM # 3. c~ FOR AGENDA OF 6/22/99 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE PEG Access Franchise Fee Support PREPARED BY: Liz Newton I/ir L DEPT HEAD OK k# CITY MGR OK 144A-V:~ ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Continuation of the City's franchise fee contribution for PEG Access. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution authorizing a 15% franchise fee contribution for Peg Access for the 1999/2000 fiscal year. INFORMATION SUMMARY At the June 8 meeting, Council directed staff to prepare a resolution setting the City's franchise fee contribution for PEG Access at 15%. Further, the City Council committed to a review of the support level within the next year. The attached resolution sets the franchise fee support for PEG Access at 15% and commits the City to consideration of the franchise fee support sometime after July 1, 2000 and before January 1, 2001 in conformance with the MACC Intergovernmental Agreement. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Set the franchise fee contribution at 17%. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMTI'TEE STRATEGY i Community Character and Quality of Life Volunteerism Goal #2. "Citizen involvement opportunities will be maximized by providing educational programs on process, assuring accessibility to information, providing opportunities for input and establishing and maintaining a program of effective communication." s FISCAL NO i S It is estimated that the City would pay $41,072.85 at the 15% franchise fee level, retaining $164,291.40 or 60%. \\TIG333\USR\DEPTS\ADM\CATH\'\COUNCIL\STAFF REPORT PEG ACCESS.DOC.DOT awl AGENDA ITEM #3 .3 For Agenda of June 22, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Budget Adjustment #11 for receipt of Northland Insurance Settlement. PREPARED BY: Cyndi A Turner f_DEPT HEAD OK -1'*/W .ch CITY ADMIN ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the City Council approve a resolution adjusting the 1998/99 adopted budget for the award of a legal settlement from Northland Insurance Co.? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution adjusting the 1998/99 adopted budget. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City of Tigard has been awarded a legal settlement regarding the Dolan case, which settled December 10, 1997. The 1998/99 adopted budget did not anticipate resources from an insurance settlement. The Budget must be adjusted to recognize the receipt of such funds. The attached resolution includes the budget adjustment. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A FISCAL NOTES Approval of this budget adjustment increases revenues in the General Fund by $450,000. OWN Rig zip AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF 6-22-99 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE APPROVE APPOINTMENT OF ELIZABETH A. NEWTON AND DEE WISE AS DEPUTY CITY RECORDERS PREPARED BY: Cathy Wheatley DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should Elizabeth A. Newton and Dee Wise be appointed as Deputy City Recorders? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached resolution appointing Elizabeth A. Newton and Dee Wise as Deputy City Recorders. INFORMATION SUMMARY In order to assure continuity of the job functions and services provided by the office of City Recorder, Deputy Recorders are appointed to serve in the absence or unavailability of the City Recorder. The attached resolution appoints Elizabeth A. Newton and Dee Wise as Deputy Recorders. Ms. Newton, Assistant to the City Manager, has served in this capacity previously and has assisted with Council support and in elections. Ms. Dee Wise, Senior Records Specialist, has assisted in areas of records research, codification of ordinances and has been working with the City Recorder to learn Election Official responsibilities for City elections. This resolution will replace Resolution No. 98-43, which appointed Ms. Newton and Ms. Gomez as Deputy Recorders. Ms. Gomez is no longer a City employee and, therefore, the records should be updated. This request is also timely since the City Recorder will be on medical leave for approximately six weeks beginning the week of June 28, 1999. When the City Recorder returns from leave in August, the plan is to recruit apart- time employee for the position previously held by Ms. Gomez. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Other suggestions by Council members for providing City Recorder services could be implemented. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A i FISCAL NOTES Information will be submitted to the Human Resources Department, in the proper format, describing the Deputy City Recorder duties performed by Ms. Wise accompanied by an estimate of the amount of time spent in this area. This will be done for the purposes of analyzing the position within the Classification and Compensation Plan. I:WDM\CATHMOUNCIOSTAFF REPORT - DEPUTY RECORDER.DOC.DOT 10 d AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF June 22. 1999 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE A Resolution Declaring the Need to Acquire Property for the Improvement of Certain Streets within L hg of the 69th Avenue Local Improvement District. PREPARED BY: A.P. Duenas DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK Cn/yQyl-~ ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall City Council approve a resolution declaring the need to acquire property for the improvement of certain streets within the boundaries of the 69th Avenue Local Improvement District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve, by motion, the attached resolution declaring the need to acquire the property described in "Exhibit A" of the resolution? INFORMATION SUMMARY The Tigard City Charter grants the City authority to acquire land for public purposes. In addition, the City is authorized by ORS 281.510 to purchase, acquire, take, use, enter upon and appropriate land and property within or without its corporate limits for the purpose of establishing, laying out, widening, enlarging or extending roads, streets or highways. Ordinance No 99-07 established the 69th Avenue Local Improvement District (LID), authorized the acquisition of land as provided by State law and the Tigard Municipal Code, and authorized the construction of street improvements within the boundaries of the LID. This resolution declares the need to acquire property for the construction of the street improvements within the LID boundaries. This acquisition of property to allow construction of the street improvements within the City of Tigard is for the health, safety, benefit and general welfare of the public. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY The improvements proposed by this LID meet the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow goal of Improve Traffic Safety, strategy Encourage through traffic on major collectors and arterials. It upgrades an existing gravel street to provide safer, more efficient traffic movements. MUM FISCAL NOTES Funding is provided through the 69`h Avenue Local Improvement District. I:\Ci*rMde\Sum\Agenda for 69°Avenue LID Land Acquisition AGENDA ITEM # 3. FOR AGENDA OF LP - a a- 4Q _ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Amending the Intergovernmental Agreement with Metro for Pass-through of Greenspaces Funds PREPARED BY: D. Roberts DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL A resolution amending the intergovernmental agreement with Metro to obtain funding for certain open space and trail acquisition or enhancement projects pursuant to the local share component of the Metro open spaces general obligation bond measure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the resolution. INFORMATION SUMMARY The attached IGA amendment for the pass through of local share Greenspaces funds reflects the changes to the Metro-Tigard IGA project list directed by Council at its June 8th meeting. Under the IGA, the City is eligible to receive $758,000 in Greenspaces bond measure funds. These local funds are dispersed by Metro on a reimbursement basis for eligible activities as the money is expended by the local park provider. The City list includes five projects: Tualatin River Tracts, Fem Street Forest Parcel, Bull Mountain Forest Area, Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge Design, and Fanno Creek Trail Corridor. Except for the Fanno Creek Trail project, all of the projects on the City list have been completed. Among these completed projects, only the Bull Mountain Forest project, which was completed last year with the acquisition of the 4-acre Cache Creek forest property, has not been closed out. Metro requires local share budgets to be subtotaled by individual project. In the case of the Bull Mountain project, the amount expended on the purchase of the Cache Creek site exceeded the amount budgeted for the Bull Mountain target area by $66,000. In order to pay for this additional cost, unspent funds identified for the Tualatin River pedestrian bridge design project ($43,500) and $22,525 identified for the Fanno Creek Trail Corridor are being shifted to the purchase of the Cache Creek site. Amending the IGA to reflect the actual purchase price of this property is needed to meet Metro's subtotaling requirement and allow the City to be reimbursed for the full cost of this transaction. This adjustment provides no funds for the recently considered one-acre Bull Mountain property, identified as the Hanson site. It merely a allows the City to collect from Metro the Greenspaces dollars the City has used to purchase land for what is now called Cache Creek Park. As indicated, the Fanno Creek Corridor Project is the City's last remaining active project. As defined in the amended IGA, this project includes land acquisition, trail construction, natural area restoration along the creek, and extension of the northern boundary from Tiedeman Avenue to Tigard Street. Five trail sections between Tigard and Main Streets have been identified for construction this year. The remaining Greenspaces dollars will be applied to the cost of individual segments as they are ready to implement. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY Growth Management Goal #1 calls for accommodating growth while protecting livability, with natural resource protection identified as one of the action strategies listed under this goal. FISCAL NOTES Revision of the official City project list to reflect the purchase of the Cache Creek property will allow the City to seek reimbursement of the full $345,025 project cost from the City's Greenspaces set aside. IAcitywidcNsum\fannotnW.doc Egan= i E AGENDA ITEM # For Agenda of June 22, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE State Revenue Sharing and State Shared Revenues PREPARED BY: Cyndi A Turner lJt DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the City Council approve an Ordinance declaring the City's election to receive state revenues and shall the Tigard City Council approve a resolution certifying that it provides certain services making it eligible to receive state shared revenues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the approval of the attached ordinance and resolution. INFORMATION SUMMARY State Revenue Sharing The City has estimated the receipt of $205,000 of state revenue sharing in the 1999/00 budget. Such funds are available from the state for those cities that meet the requirements. The requirements include a public hearing before the budget committee and a public hearing before the City Council. The hearing before the ':adget committee was held May 24, 1999. Approval of the attached ordinance will meet the states requirement for the City's election to receive these revenues. State Shared Revenues The City has estimated the receipt of the following state shared revenues in 1999/00: Cigarette Tax $ 93,170 Liquor Tax $ 295,680 State Gas Tax $2,170,245 The state requires the City to certify its eligibility to receive these revenues by stating that it provides more than four of the services listed in ORS 221.760. The City does provide a sufficient number of required services and is therefore eligible for such revenues. Approval of the attached resolution will meet the state requirement of certification. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Remove these revenues from the budget. FISCAL NOTES Approval of the ordinance and resolution secures $593,850 of revenue in the general fund and $2,170,245 in the state gas tax fund. AGENDA ITEM # For Agenda of June 22, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE 1999/00 Budget Adoption PREPARED BY: Cyndi A Turner VI DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK JA ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Local budget law requires that a budget for the ensuing fiscal year be adopted prior to July 1 by the governing body, after approval by the budget committee and after a public nearing has been held before the City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Resolution which includes the Budget Committee recommendations. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City of Tigard budget committee reviewed the 1999/00 proposed budget as submitted by the Budget Officer. The Budget Committee completed their review on May 24, 1999 with approval of the budget proposal as amended by the committee in the total amount of $50,176,950. The committee's changes to the proposed budget are reflected in Exhibit "A" of the attached resolution. The resolution to adopt the budget normally establishes the cost of living adjustment for non-represented employees, however Council has not yet approved such an adjustment. The Budget was prepared using an estimate of 2.5% for non-represented employees. The budget was also prepared using 2.5% for OPEU employees, per the current contract. The TPOA contract is currently under negotiation, however, the budget was prepared with a cost of living adjustment of 3% maximum. Local budget law gives the governing body the authority to make certain changes to the budget committee recommendation prior to adoption of the budget. The Council may adjust budget resources up or down and may increase or decrease expenditures. Increases in expenditures are limited to 10% of the published total in each fund. No adjustments by the City Council prior to adoption are recommended. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED If the Council wishes to adopt the budget as recommended by the budget committee with no changes, the attached resolution should be approved. FISCAL NOTES The budget as approved by the budget committee provides appropriations of $50,176,950. The recommendation includes the levy of general property taxes at the City's permanent rate of $2.5131 per thousand and a debt service tax levy in the amount of $246,685. I AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF June 22, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE FY -2000Capital Improvement Program PREPARED BY. A.F. Duenas DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL COUNCIL Adoption of the FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program and approval of the FY 1999-2000 Projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, adopt the FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program as described in the attached memorandum dated June 8, 1999 with Appendices A through J. INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is a memorandum outlining the FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program. This memorandum with appendices presents the recommended projects for FY 1999-2000 and a tentative list of projects for the following six years. The 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program was presented to the Planning Commission at its meeting on May 17, 1999. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed program with minor modifications and corrections as recommended by the City Engineer. This revised program is submitted to City Council for review and approval. The adopted program would be the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 1999-2000. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Adopt the FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program with further modifications. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY COMMITTEE STRATEGY The 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program supports the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow Transportation and Traffic goals of Improve Traffic Safety (all strategies in the plan) and Improve Traffic Flow (all strategies in the plan). FISCAL NOTES The FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program project amounts are based on the Finance Director's funding projections for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 IAcitywide\sum\1999-2000 CIP I I 2A a= L CITY OF TIG,ARD Engineering Department Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD 13125 5W Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Phone (503) 6394171 Fax (503) 624-0752 TO: City Council C J~~" FROM: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E. City Engineer DATE: June 8, 1999 SUBJECT: FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program This document presents the proposed FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for review and approval by City Council. The FY 1999-2000 CIP was presented to the Planning Commission on May 17, 1999 for review and recommendation to City Council. The Planning Commission approved the FY 1999-2000 CIP as submitted with minor modifications and corrections as recommended by the City Engineer. This document reflects those modifications and corrections. Background The long-term Capital Improvement Program, initially adopted by the City Council on August 23, 1994, identified projects for the 1994-95 CIP Program and proposed a list of projects for the next 6- year period. The Capital Improvement Program includes improvements to the streets, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, water and parks systems. The Engineering Department manages the street, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer CIP's. The Public Works Department manages the Water System CIP, while the Parks CIP is managed jointly by the Planning and Engineering Departments. The Capital Improvement Program is updated each year, and is reviewed and approved by the City Council. The CIP formulation is separate from the yearly operating budget process, but is approved on the same fiscal year basis as that budget. While the program lists projects for subsequent fiscal years, the projects shown are tentative and are subject to change during the formulation process for each specific budget year. The CIP, through the adoption process, therefore establishes the budget for each fiscal year and serves as a planning document to guide the infrastructure improvements over the following 6 years. During each budget year's update, the revenue estimates are adjusted, the project MEN= cost estimates are reviewed, and the program and project priorities are re-evaluated based on changes in City plans, citizen input, and additional data which may become available. The 1996-97 CIP listed a 6-year program; the 1997-98 CIP returned to the 7-year period originally established in 1994. The 1999-2000 CIP continues with the 7-year program projections. Process The Capital Improvement Program update process begins with citizen involvement through the Citizen Involvement Teams. An overview of the CIP process is presented to the CIT's, usually early in the calendar year so that the entire process can be completed and the annual CIP budget submitted to and approved by City Council prior to the beginning of the next fiscal year (July 1). This overview was presented during the March CIT meeting this year. The CIT meeting in April provided the CIT members with the opportunity to provide input into the process and to nominate projects for evaluation and possible inclusion into the program. The Planning Commission review typically provides another opportunity for public comment on the proposed plan. After review by the Planning Commission, the plan with subsequent modifications, if any, is submitted, with Commission recommendation, to the City Council for review and approval. Council may make additional modifications to the plan during its review and approval process. The approved plan would be the approved Capital Improvement Program for the next fiscal year. The following summarizes the program update for the 1999-2000 budget year. It is important to note that each funding source has restrictions on the types of projects that can be constructed. Projects cannot be moved from one funding source to another. Committed projects are those projects that have been previously approved for 1998-99 funding, but have not been completed as of June 30, 1999. The specific lists of projects are contained in the appendices associated with each of the program areas. FY 1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STREET SYSTEM PROGRAM The following are the street projects proposed for FY 1999-2000. A complete listing of the projects, including the full 7-year program, is attached as Appendix A. Recommended Street (Gas Tax) Projects The gas tax revenue can be used for upgrading the collector and local streets within Tigard, without restriction. However, this revenue is limited. and is not sufficient to fund all the street improvement needs of the City. The total State Gas Tax amount shown for the 1999-2000 fiscal year is based on current budgetary projections. Although there were numerous major street projects initiated and completed during FY 1998-99, there are several projects that require funding to be carried over into FY 1999-2000. The following is a brief description of the projects recommended for Gas Tax Funding next year: ® Committed Projects: These are projects that have been already committed but not completed at the end of FY 1998-99. Memorandum to City Council 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 2 of 13 • Pedestrian Improvements (Grant Avenue): This project will provide a $47,000 pedestrian path along Grant Avenue connecting the existing walkway along Park Street with School Street and providing pedestrian access to Charles F. Tigard Elementary School. Design was completed in FY 1998-99 and construction will begin in July this year. • 79th Avenue (Design and Right-of-Way): This project has been awarded to an $80,000 engineering consultant to design the improvements of 79th Avenue from Durham Road to Bonita Road. The final design will be completed by the end of 1999. • Transportation System Plan Update Study: The funding under this project is $25,000 for the transportation consultant contract to complete the TSP Update study. The consultant has basically completed the "Motor Vehicle" portion of the contract. The remaining work includes analysis of other transportation modes, development and participation in the public involvement process, preparation of the draft TSP, public hearings on the draft TSP, and finally adoption into the City's comprehensive plan. o New Projects: • Mapleleaf Street and 71st Avenue (from 72"d Avenue to Oak Street): This $50,000 project widens the existing pavement on 71 st Avenue and Mapleleaf Street to the standard width of a local street. This amount provides funding for right- of-way acquisition and design of the improvements. Construction will be programmed for next fiscal year's budget. c Traffic Circulation and Feasibility Study: This project is to perform a traffic $20,000 study in the area of Tigard covering Canterbury Lane, Murdock Street, 109`h Avenue, Royalty Parkway, Naeve Street, and areas east towards connections with 97th Avenue and Sattler Street. The study is intended determine which street and sidewalk connections make sense for improvements to provide balanced transportation and pedestrian circulation within this area. • Embedded Crosswalk Lights (Pilot Project): This provides funding for $30,000 installation of embedded crosswalk lights at two or more locations. Potential sites for the pilot project are the following intersections: Grant Avenue and Walnut Street, 121St Avenue and Katherine Street and 1215` Avenue, and Springwood Drive. ® Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PMMP) - This is a program of $233,000 corrective and preventive maintenance on all paved streets in Tigard. It addresses those streets that can still benefit from corrective or preventative action. Last year's program expended $415,000 from the $500,000 PMMP budget. Streets proposed to receive overlays during the 1999-2000 fiscal year include Bonita Road (72"d Avenue to the City Limits), Scoffins Street (Main Street to Ash Avenue), McKenzie Street (east of 99W), Meadow Street (at Memorandum to City Council 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 3 of 13 Tiedeman Avenue) and 107`h Avenue (Cook Lane to Park Street). Scoffins Street may need reconstruction to correct problems with the street crown and provide proper drainage. This will be determined during the design phase of the PMMP package. • The Traffic Calming Program - This program provides funding for traffic $60,000 calming measures Citywide. Much of the funding will be used to place speed humps on streets that have clearly demonstrated the need for installation of these traffic-calming devices. However, other traffic calming measures may be installed for streets where speed humps are not appropriate. The program for FY 1999-2000 includes $60,000 for City-funded projects. Up to $15,000 of this amount can be used on a 50-50 cost sharing basis with residents for placement of speed humps in streets that do not make this year's list. This year's program includes speed humps for 135`h Avenue (south of Walnut Street), Grant Avenue (Walnut Street to Tigard Street), Summerfield Drive (Durham Road to 98`h Avenue), Benchview Terrace (Bull Mountain Road to Mistletoe Drive), North Dakota Street (south of Anton Drive) and Canterbury Lane (103`d Avenue to 106`h Avenue). Recommended TIF (Traffic Impact Fee) Projects TIF Funding can be used only for highway and transit capital improvements that provide additional capacity to major transportation systems. This finding is limited to major collector and arterial streets, and 50% must be spent on arterial streets. A major portion of these funds was being held in reserve until our transportation planning is completed. The Transportation System Update Plan Study has made significant progress with the "motor vehicle" segment nearing completion. The projects proposed in the FY 1999-2000 CIP are high priority projects in the Transportation Plan. However, there will not be sufficient funding in the TIF to complete all the projects that are envisioned over the next five to 10 years. A Transportation Bond Task Force has been formed to examine potential bond projects with the intention of placing a transportation bond issue on the year 2000 election ballot. That proposed transportation bond, if approved by the voters, would provide a major amount of the funding for transportation-related improvements Citywide. In the meantime, the TIF will be utilized to design some of the potential bond projects and to reconstruct and expand portions of the major collectors within the City. The TIF-funded projects proposed for the next CIP Budget Year are as follows: • Committed Projects: • Gaarde Street (Design and right-of-way): This project is the design of Gaarde $650,000 Street from Highway 99W to 121St Avenue, and from the Quail Hollow-West subdivision to its intersection with Walnut Street. The funding of $650,000 is provided to design the projects and begin the right-of-way acquisition necessary for construction implementation. • Bonita Road from the Railroad Tracks to the Fanno Creek: $800,000 was $386,000 funded in FY 1997-98. $414,000 was expended for Phases 1 and 2, which Memorandum to City Council 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 4 of 13 included underground utilities and reconstruction of the railroad crossings. Phase 3 of this project will include street widening. Necessary right-of-way and easements required for the widening have been obtained. Construction began in early June on this project. • Walnut Street/Tiedeman Avenue Intersection Realignment and Signalization $1,300,000 (Construction): The design of this project was completed in FY 1998-99. Project construction is expected to begin July 1999 and is projected for completion by September 2000. • Burnham Street Reconstruction and Widening (Design and Right-of-Way): $300,000 This project is the design of Burnham Street for development to ultimate width from Main Street to Hall Boulevard. The project design would identify the right-of-way required and begin the acquisition process. Additional funding that may be needed for right-of-way acquisition and construction of the project would be programmed either in future budgets, or in a transportation bond issue. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Project: $190,000 Lincoln Street, between Greenburg Road and Commercial Street, has been approved for CDBG funding effective July 1, 1999. The scope of this project is to construct half-street improvements, which include construction of sidewalks, curbs and streetlights. The total project cost is $190,000 with $166,800 in CDBG funding and $23,200 in City funding and in-kind contribution. 69 1h Avenue Local Improvement District Project: $1,600,000 This project is the construction of 69`h Avenue between Hampton Street and Dartmouth Street to its ultimate section in compliance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The LID was initiated and formed by the City at the request of Specht Development, Inc. The project has been designed and bid award has been made for construction of the improvements. Land acquisition for the extension of Beveland Street from 68th Avenue to 701h Avenue is included in this project. The total LID cost is estimated at $1,600,000. This amount is approximate and includes all costs involved in the LID. The actual costs could well be less than this amount, and will be compiled after the improvements are completed and accepted by the City. PARIS SYSTEM PROGRAM Introduction This initial draft of the parks component of the City CIP provides a schedule for addressing local park and open space needs over the next seven years. Following public review and adoption, the projects Memorandum to City Council 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 5 of 13 listed for the first year of the park CIP will be incorporated into the City's 1999-2000 budget process. Although the general intention is to include the projects for each following year into the next year's budget process, projects listed for fiscal years 2000-2001 to 2006-2007 are regarded as a tentative list. The scheduling of these projects is subject to change based on the changing needs of the community and changes in available funding for financing park capital improvements. The need for flexibility in making modifications to the seven-year plan, as the need arises, is especially important with regard to potential land acquisitions. Land acquisition opportunities may present themselves prior to their identification in the CIP. Flexibility is needed to ensure that if properties considered critical to the park system come on the market, the City has the ability to evaluate the situation and move in a timely manner, if appropriate. In order to maximize city park improvement dollars, the same flexibility is needed with regard to potential grant funding and partnership opportunities, which may not follow the timeline or be identified in the seven-year plan. Park and Open Space Master Plan The ten-year "Park and Open Space Master Plan" adopted March 1999 was used as a framework in developing the parks CIP. However, the present CIP includes only a portion of the improvement projects recommended for funding in the master plan. This is primarily because the master plan recommendations assumed a much higher level of funding than presently exists. As a financial planning tool, the present CIP takes a conservative approach and reflects funding levels for which there is some level of confidence. Should new funding be realized, it will be possible to accelerate the schedule of capital improvements and to include additional projects recommended in the park and open space master plan. Woodard Park Expansion Plan The same month the parks master plan was adopted, the city adopted a site and management plan, developed with neighborhood involvement, for Woodard Park and an abutting a seven-acre property purchased with Metro regional Greenspace funds. Metro approval of this plan is pending. Three projects included in the present CIP relate to the expansion area and are contingent on Metro granting to Tigard the authority to manage the seven-acre property in accordance with the city's adopted site plan. Funding Sources Revenue sources for the 1999-2007 parks CIP include Park System Development Charges (SDCs), local share Greenspaces bond measure funds, other funds, and grants. The park SDC is the city's most consistent funding source for parks. It is a charge imposed on new development in order to recoup some portion of the cost of providing new residents and employees with park facilities. The draft CIP assumes the park system development charge will be revised upward during 1999. City Council has indicated an intention of increasing the fee structure and, if allowed by Washington County, of expanding the SDC to new development in the Urban Services Area. Local share is the portion of the regional Greenspaces bond measure to be passed through to local park providers for neighborhood and community scale Greenspace projects. These funds can be spent only on natural area acquisition and trail related projects. The inter-governmental agreement with Metro for the expenditure of these funds expires 12/31/99. Other funds include an annual contribution of $15,000 from the Atfalati Recreation District toward the cost of acquiring land and improving Cook Park. Q ant funds include a pending Memorandum to City Council 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 6 of 13 transportation department grant application (Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge) and a potential Community Development Block Grant proposal (Bonita Park). It is important to emphasize that these grant programs are competitive and there is no guarantee that Tigard's project proposals will be picked for funding. Project Descriptions The list of first year, or FY 1999-2000, projects include "Committed" and "New" projects. "Committed" projects are projects that were funded last year, but were not anticipated to be completed as of July 1, 1999. The funding shown for these projects are the amounts needed to complete the project. "New" projects are projects that will be funded for the first time. Attached as Exhibit B is the Parks component of the City's seven-year CIP plan. ® Committed Projects 1 & 12. Cook Park Expansion: Construct bio-swale, east restrooms, parking lot, and install utilities. 2. Woodard Park Play Structure: Replace older play structure with new structure designed for younger children. 3. Woodard Park Improvements: Install new restroom or other improvements as called for in master plan. 4. Fanno Creek Park Lighting: Install overhead lighting along pedestrian trails. 5. Tigard St./Fowler School Trial: Construct 1,800-foot segment of Fanno Creek trail with bridge over Fanno Creek. 6. Fowler School/Woodard Park Trail: Install 1,526 foot segment of Fanno Creek trail 7. Woodard Park/Grant Avenue Trail: Acquire land and construct 1,100-foot trail segment, including bridge over Fanno Creek. 8. Grant Avenue/Main Street Trail: Obtain right-of-way and install 650 feet of new trail connecting to existing trail at Morland Plumbing. Replace existing path located under Pacific Highway. 9. Main Street/Ash Street Trail: Install boardwalk, bridge, and paved path between Main and existing Fanno Creek trail segment. s 10. Greenspaces Acquisitions: Purchase natural area along Fanno Creek by 12/99 with remaining Greenspaces local share funds. Memorandum to City Council 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 7 of 13 11. Bottom Barriers - Summer Lake: Provide bottom barriers for weed suppression in Summer Lake at those areas that cannot be reached by the aquatic harvester. Y New Projects 13. ADA Transition Plan: Develop system-wide plan to meet federal American with Disability Act access standards. 14. Fenced Dog Park: Locate suitable site for fenced dog park and address on-going maintenance requirements through dog owner friends group. 15, 20, 27, 29, & 33. Upgrade Playgrounds: Replacement and retrofit all play structures as needed to improve safety. 16. Cache Creek Park Master Plan: Hire consultant to develop site plan for natural area park with public involvement. 17. Realign trail at N. Dakota Street: Realign Fanno Creek trail at N. Dakota St. to connect opposite southerly segment. 18 Cook Park/851h Avenue Trail: Extend multi-use trail from the end of 85th Ave. to connect with the Cook Park trail system. 19. Cook Park Field Drainage: Upgrade existing sportsfields at Cook Park. 21. Trail Alignments Study: Determine the feasibility of and map alignments of proposed trail extensions: Ash Creek/Fanno, Summer Creek/Fanno, Genesis/Pathfinder, Durham Road/Tualatin River, and Powerline from Barrows to Tual. River. 22. Walnut/Woodard Park Trail: Construct segment connecting Pathfinder/Genesis to main stem Fanno Creek Trail. 23. "Albertson" Park Improvements: Construct priority improvement(s) identified in park master plan now under preparation. 24. Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge: Construct bridge over Tualatin River using grant funds, if awarded. 25. Bonita Road Park: Construct neighborhood park financed by grant funds, if awarded. 26. "Canterbury" Park: In cooperation with water district, develop neighborhood park on Little Bull Mt. Reservoir site. Memorandum to City Council 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 8 of 13 OWN= ffl~lmlmffimnm~~ 28. Cook Park/RR trail: Extend Tualatin River trail from Cook Park to railroad tracks. 30. Construct rollerblade/skateboard facility: Identify site and construct skate park. 31. Renovate Woodard Park: Develop Woodard Park in accordance with master plan. 32. Hall/Bonita trail Construct Hall/Bonita Fanno Creek trail segment. 34. Bonita Road/Durham trail: Obtain right-of-way and complete segment of Fanno Creek trail. 35. Develop nature park: Implement master plan for Cache Creek Park. 36. Acquire land for Jack Park Expansion: Acquire 3.4-acre property located between existing park and Walnut Street. 37. Pathfinder/Genesis Trail Extension: Extend trail from Fairhaven to Gaarde Street. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PROGRAM The sanitary sewer funding has funding sources that are reserved for maintenance repairs to the existing sanitary sewer system, capacity upgrades as recommended from the USA Master Plan, and for the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program. A new program was created by City Council in FY 1997-98 to extend sewers into commercial areas. This new program is included in the 1998-99 CIP budget and is again included in the 1999-2000 CIP budget. The unrestricted portion of the Sanitary Sewer Fund can be used for repair and maintenance projects Citywide and for extension of the existing system to unsewered areas. In addition, one of the City Council goals is preparation of a Comprehensive Public Facility Plan for sewers, both storm and sanitary. Several studies will need to be performed in FY 1999-2000 to obtain information necessary for preparation of the Sanitary Sewer Facility Plan. Funding for these studies is included in this budget. The detailed project listing for 1999- 2000 and the full 7-year program is attached as Appendix C. The projects that are proposed for Sanitary Sewer Funding are as follows: • Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extension Programs: The $500,000 Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program has been a highly successful program commencing with its implementation in the 1996-97 CIP budget year. Last fiscal year's program included two homes on Hillview Street. There are two projects that have been designed and are ready for implementation in FY 1999- 2000: 106th & Johnson Street and the Walnut & Tiedeman Intersection. Memorandum to Cit•/ Council 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program page 9 of 13 • Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program: These funds would be used to $40,000 contract out sewer repair projects that are beyond the repair capabilities of the Public Works Department. This program is expected to be a continuing program in future years. A proposed sanitary sewer major maintenance project in FY 1999-2000 includes Pinebrook Street (west of Hall Boulevard). • Commercial Street to Burnham Road: This project provides funding to upsize $100,000 approximately 1,250 feet of sanitary sewer between Commercial Street and Burnham Road. • Bonita Road (at Milton Court): This project is to replace or relocate $40,000 .approximately 250 feet of 8-inch sanitary sewer pipe that crosses Fanno Creek at Milton Court. The existing pipe has poor grade, severe belly and has required monthly cleaning for many years. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PROGRAM The storm drainage funding has the same mix of sources as the sanitary sewer fund. The funding is generally reserved for currently unknown small projects that come up during the year. Funding from the new SDC's must be used on projects designated on the USA Master Plan. One of the major objectives for the Engineering Department during the next fiscal year is the development of a Comprehensive Public Facility Plan for Storm Drainage, in accordance with a City Council goal. Once the plan is developed and projects are identified and prioritized, implementation of project design and construction will be incorporated into the annual CIP budget. The Public Facility Plan projects are expected to be initiated in FY 1999-2000. Until the Plan is developed and adopted, non-SDC funded projects selected for incorporation in the CIP budget will be on a case-by-case basis with emphasis on resolving relatively small-scale, severe drainage problem areas. The detailed project listing is attached as Appendix D. The projects currently proposed for CIP Budget Year 1999-2000 are as follows: o Committed Projects: • 118th Court Erosion Control: This is an erosion control project that needs to $50,000 extend the improvements further downstream to alleviate the heavy erosion 4 on the side slopes and streambed. The initial step would be to initiate a study of the area along the entire streambed to determine the extent of the erosion and to provide measures for resolving the problem. The remainder of the + funds would be used to design the project, obtain any necessary permits, and initiate construction based on the plan developed. Any additional work that cannot be completed with the funding available would be considered for inclusion in next fiscal year's program. • Lincoln Street Drainage Improvements: The drainage system upgrade on 91 st $60,000 Avenue, from Greenburg Road to Lincoln Street, has been included in the 91st improvement project. This project extends the drainage system along Lincoln Street from 91st Avenue to Commercial Street. Design and Memorandum to City Council x 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 10 of 13 construction of this project will be combined with the Lincoln Street project that is funded by CDBG. 116th Avenue Drainage Improvements: This project intercepts the existing $75,000 drainage on 115th Avenue and re-routes the storm runoff down 116th Avenue to an existing creek. The existing system is inadequate, cannot accommodate the storm runoff during the heavy rains, and frequently overflows flooding the surrounding homes. S New Projects: • Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program: This program addresses minor storm drainage problems requiring more than normal maintenance effort. $60,000 This year program includes drainage repairs at Katherine Street (at 12151 Avenue), Ann Court (at 124`h Avenue) and Gaarde Street (at 118th Court). • Pacific Highway and Durham Road: The outfall of the existing drainage $50,000 system at the intersection cannot be located. This project installs approximately 100 feet of storm pipe and connects to the State system in Pacific Highway. Completion of this project will eliminate traffic hazards created by standing water during heavy rains. • Walnut Terrace (at 69`h Avenue): The existing storm lines on this street are $80,000 impossible to maintain due to failing materials and various diameters in the same run. This project provides funding to replace approximately 800 feet of storm drain pipe and construct needed catch basins. • Hoodview Street Drainage: This projects installs an underground drainage $40,000 system on the east portion of Hoodview Street to collect the storm runoff and pipe it to the drainage system on Kable Street. The project is intended to alleviate the extensive amount of sheet flow on the street and to divert year- round discharge from one or more of the lots to the underground drainage system. • Thorn Street (at 82nd Avenue): This project installs 860 feet of storm pipe, $75,000 catch basins, manholes and an outfall structure. The funding will also be used to acquire a permanent drainage easement. The total project cost is $75,000 with $65,600 in CDBG funding and $9,400 in City funding. WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM The Water System projects and funding are decided by Maintenance Services in the Public Works Department, with the approval of the Intergovernmental Water Board. The list of water system projects for the upcoming fiscal year, and for the next six years afterwards, is attached as Appendix E. The following are the Water System Projects for FY 1999-2000. • Replace 460 feet of 10-inch cast iron water main with 12-inch ductile iron; $90,000 460 feet of 8-inch cast iron water main with 8-inch ductile iron; and 175 feet Memorandum to City Council 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 11 of 13 of 6-inch cast iron water main with 8-inch ductile iron on SW Tiedeman Avenue at SW Walnut Street. This project is part of the Tiedeman/Fonner/Walnut intersection improvement project. • Install 3,400 feet of 24-inch transmission main on SW Beef Bend Road from $750,000 SW 131st Avenue to SW King Arthur. This is to be completed during the County's project that will be funded by MSTIP 3. The County project consists of widening Beef Bend Road from two lanes to three, construction of retaining walls, sidewalks, storm drainage improvements, and vertical and horizontal realignment. The County postponed this project during 1997 due to Measure 47. • Replace 800 feet of 6-inch cast iron water main with 6-inch ductile pipe on $60,000 SW Lincoln Street from SW Greenburg Road to SW 91st Avenue. This is an on-going program of replacing old cast iron water mains with ductile iron pipe in conjunction with the City's street improvement program. • Construction of pressure reducing stations within the Bull Mountain system. $40,000 The pressure reducing stations are constructed as needed, when new subdivisions come on-line. On Bull Mountain, properties below an elevation of 580 feet are serviced from the 713-foot service zone. At an elevation of 430 feet, the water pressure becomes excessive and the operating (working) pressure must be reduced. Depending upon timing, we have identified two proposed subdivisions (Autumn Hill and Quail Hollow West) that would . require pressure-reducing facilities. • Install 2,700 feet of 12-inch distribution main on SW 150th Avenue from $260,000 Bull Mountain Road to Hawks Ridge (Bull Mountain system). • Install 1,450 feet of 12-inch transmission main on SW North Dakota between $140,000 115th and 121st Avenue. This will complete a 12-inch loop to SW Scholls Ferry Road. APPENDICES The appendices with the detailed project listings and other relevant documents are attached as follows: • Appendix A: Street System Program • Appendix B: Parks System Program • Appendix C: Sanitary Sewer System Program • Appendix D: Storm Drainage System Program • Appendix E: Water System Program Memorandum to City Council 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 12 of l3 • Appendix F: 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program ® Appendix G: Pavement Corrective and Preventative Maintenance Backlog o Appendix H: Capital Improvement Program Overview dated March 4, 1999 Appendix I: Proposed PMMP Projects -FY 1999-2000 o Appendix J: CIP Funding Projections from Director of Finance dated March 29, 1999 c: William A. Monahan, City Manager Ed Wegner, Public Works Director Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director Cyndi Turner, Financial Operations Manager Vannie T. Nguyen, CIP Division Manager 1:\ENG\GUS\1999-2000 CIP\1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program to City Council i i f ' Memorandum to City Council 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 13 of 13 I~ yROG ~ G 0000 T S ~ 000 GOT $80,000 Committed Projects ~ (ant Avenue) $25,404 Pedestrianlml?rovem and$ht-of-SNay) $650,000 esign Update Study 440 ($166,800 CDBG ded) 79th Avenue (p plan of Way) $386,000 $190, !o L~ OOa Transpo~'rion System & %911t - $1 $1,600,000 (100°$1,790, esign ° Creek) ,300,000 Gaarde Street (D Tracks to Farm ealig nen, Bonita Road (PRedeman Avenue R $152,000 ytalnut Stree mprovements antDismct $2,336,000 $1,790,004 Lincoln street ocal Impr°vem gray 69th Avenue L Toth Comtetied $152,000 $2,336,000 vy 1999-2000 $220,000 $9g4000 nomir~tted projects $300,000 $50,000 ,1¢TransitReServe eprolects ht of-Wa`!) $20,000 .M Reserve fox Fumr and Limited Rib $30,000 Bhan► Street (Design Avenue $1,790,000 $ p of ct) $6p000 Mapleleaf Street dFeasibi lot Study Traffic Circulation ani hts (p $545,000 Embedded Crosswalk L g Ce prog $3,900,0" IM OT ~laintenan pavement mingPr°gra'x' Totals for FY 1999-2000 Traffic $325,000 Py 20001 $2,039,000 $70,000 Walnut $30,000 Transit Reserve uail Hollow to $6Q,00o TV Exten 71st Avenue (Design and ROB Gaarde Street sion-Q M,apleleaf Street @ ant (sign) page A-1 Traffic Studies ealiga galVl~unz~et~Scoffins R ~ ~RpVENiBNT PRGGRAM 1999-2000 CApIT gm, liss . 580,000 . 5300,000 $60,000 cement (Design) $600,000 Pia" 7 m Tig d street Bn a ten Ge ° 3 2000 ~1 SZ' }QQ4 pavem Ca matey ptog am Totals for vv Trdff 5430,0p0 $235,000 FY 2001-02 5$60,0Q0 580,Q04 ese~e $34,000 Tg T~ansitR Walnut 560.000 Res tre f0f n-Q Ii"ol1 2ad Const') $350000 Gaarde S et @'llst Avenue (R 590000 tr N Sd X610,000 T anlmPrOVements Geptogtarn $l,SxS,000 pedestri tMa]°rMa~tenan ~ 2001x12 Ttaff Calm~gptOgram Totals for 5534,004 0040 S1,7.7 5,000 53 560400 ' ~ 20fl2-03 e S430,000 ,M Transit R or projects $104,000 Reser`~ 5620+400 Tm~'ic Smd~es ImpTOVements ceptogtam 51,'155,004 pedestrian a aintenan 2002-03 pavernentNj lof Total for FY Traffic Calming 5620.000 5~035'~,Q0 534,044 OQ A 2 page 2003 Reserve IvTrani pr e for projects TV Remedies Traffic Sm ov I S T j~~n MPRG 4RCG~' 19992000 C~TT~' STREET SYSTEM PROGRAM PROJECT I U GA TAX OT ER-FUNDING Pedestrian Improvements $60,000 Pavement Major Maintenance Program $440,000 Traffic Calming Program $100,000 Totals for FY 2003-04 $2,655,000 $630,000 FY 2004-05 TIF Transit Reserve $700,000 TIF Reserve for Projects $2,755,000 Traffic Studies $30,000 Pedestrian Improvements $60,000 Pavement Major Maintenance Program $450,000 Traffic Calming Program $100,000 Totals for FY 2004-05 $3,455,000 $640,000 FY 2005-06 TIF Transit Reserve $770,000 TIF Reserve for Projects $3,385,000 Traffic Studies $30,000 Pedestrian Improvements $60,000 Pavement Major Maintenance Program $440,000 Traffic Calming Program $120,000 Totals for FY 2005-06 $4,155,000 $650,000 1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPENDW A Page A-3 low TETA PRO 11ITMGROT P SY UI F sDC GpXENSI?A,' S Comwitted Projects $165,000 $60,000 Cook Park expansion $50,000 1 Woodard Park play structure $60,004 2 Woodard park improvements $125,000 3 Fanno Creek Park trail lighting $42,000 4 Tig andSt./Fowler Sch tral $55,000 5 oodard Pk trail $40,000 6 Woooedara IKJG6 nt Ave trail $150,000 $185,000 7 venuetNlain St trail 8 Grant A Main St/Ash Ave trail $20,000 $185,000 9 ace acquisitions $767,000 10 Greensp 0 Bottom Banners Total Committed projects 11 $lm,000 $15,000 $767,040 1999-2000 00,000 Committed Projects $30,000 Cook Park Expansion $20,000 12 ADA Transition plan $50,000 $37,500 13 14 Fenced dog park $10,000 $222,500 15 Upgrade playgroup aster Plan 16 Cache Creek park Dakota $1,277,000 Realign trail at N • Totals for FY 1999-2000 17 $100,000 FY 2000-01 $250,000 Cook pkl85th Ave trail copst $80,000 18 19 Cook park field drainage $30,000 Upgrade play rounds 20 Trail alignments study 21 page B-1 1999:2000 CAp1TAL IMPRG~EMEI~T PROGRAM I 1A PARIS SYSTEM PROGRAM PROTECT ' 'PARK SDC GREENSPACES OTHER/GRANT 22 Walnut/Woodard Pk trail $35,000 23 "Albertson's" Park improvements $50,000 24 Tual Riv Ped Bridge $1,000,000 25 Bonita Road Park $320,000 Totals for FY 2000-01 $545,000 $1,320,000 FY 2001-02 26 "Canterbury" neighborhood park $320,000 27 Upgrade playgrounds $80,000 28 Cook Park/RR trail $80,000 Totals for FY 2001-02 $480,000 FY 2002-03 29 Upgrade playgrounds $180,000 30 Provide rollerbld/skateboard facility $150,000 31 Renovate Woodard Park $250,000 $30,000 Totals for FY 2002-03 $580,000 $30,000 FY 2003-04 32 Hall/Bonita trail $416,000 33 Upgrade playgrounds $80,000 Totals for FY 2003-04 $496,000 FY 2004-05 34 Bonita Rd/Durham trail $415,000 35 Develop nature park $100,000 Totals for FY 2004-05 $515,000 1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPENDIX B Page B-2 OGR CVVL 4~CT 8,454,400 Fl 20056 $140,400 IackpargExp• $550,000 36 p ,quite land trail 2045-06 pathfind Totals for 31 page B-3 NT MOGRW 1999-2000 WITAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PROGRAM PROJECT FJN STRICTER SDC OTHER FUNDING FY 1999-2000 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $40,000 Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $500,000 Commercial Street to Burnham road $100,000 Bonita Road (at Milton Court) $40,000 Sanitary Sewer Facility Plan Studies $25,000 Reserve for Capacity Upgrades $2,500,000 Totals for FY 1999-2000 $705,000 $2,500,000 FY 2000-01 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance ,$40,000 Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $220,000 Reserve for Capacity Upgrades $2,885,000 Totals for FY 2000-01 $260,000 $2,885,000 FY 2001-02 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $40,000 Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $220,000 Reserve for Capacity Upgrades $3,270,000 Totals for FY 2001-02 $260,000 $3,270,000 FY 2002-03 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $40,000 Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $220,000 Reserve for Capacity Upgrades $3,655,000 Totals for FY 2002-03 $260,000 $3,655,000 1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPEND LX C Page C-1 SANITARY SEWED SYSTEM PROGRAM I Pm s ~ SDC OTHE14 IvG VROJECT FY 2003-04 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $40,000 Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $220,000 Reserve for Capacity Upgrades $4,040,000 Totals for FY 2003-04 $260,000 $4,040,000 FY 2004-05 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $40,000 Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $220,000 Reserve for Capacity Upgrades $4,425,000 Totals for FY 2004-05 $260,000 $4,425,000 FY 2005-06 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $40,000 Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions $220,000 Reserve for Capacity Upgrades $4,810,000 Totals for FY 2005-06 $260,000 $4,810,000 1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPENDIX C Page C-2 vuOGRAM STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PR - OT G SDC pRo, CT Committed Projects $50,000 $b0,00G 118th Court Erosion Control $75,000 $100,000 116th Lincoln Street Avenue Drainage Drainage improvements Improvements $260,000 Washington Square Pretreatment $185,000 $360,000 Summer Creek Wetland Rest~oraatiOComwitted Projects $360,000 FY 1999 2000 $185,000 $60,000 Committed Projects $50,000 $80,000 $75,000 ($65,600 CDl3G) Storm Drainage Major Maintenance program and Durham Road Pacific Highway 69thAvenue) $40,000 Walnut Terrace (at $90,000 Thom Street (at 82nd Avenue) Hoodview Street Drainage $35,000 $450,000 Reserve for USA Master plan projects $450,000 Reserve for Public Facility plan Totals for FY 1999-2000 $130,000 FY 2000-01 $115,000 Reserve for USA Master Plan projects $60,000 $130,040 Reserve for Publ Facility Maintenance 2000-01 $175,000 Storm Drainage Totals for FY $170,000 FY 2001-02 Reserve for USA Master Plan Page D-1 ,NDLX D ~pF 1999-2000 CAPITAL- IMPROVENMNT PROGRAM GRAM PRO x6owwwwolow M AGE 5'FO -r $215,000 $170,000 $60,000 projects $275,000 Public Facility Plan 2001-02 Reserve for e major Mainten totals for' Storm Dram $210,040 $315,000 Fy 2002-03 $60,000 $210,000 Reserve for USA Master Plan pro}ecis $375,000 Facility plan2002_03 Reserve for Pu blic Ma3OT . Mainten totals for SWIM Drainage $250,000 `,415,000 2003A4 $60,000 $250,040 eforUSP.Facility plan Plan projects 15,000 Reserve Facility 2003-04 geserv~ymage Major Mainten 'Totals for FY Storm $290,000 $515,000 Fy 2004-05 $60,400 14aster plan projects $290,000 $575,000 blic Facility Ylan Reserve for USA Vy 2004-05 Reserve for Pu a or Main%eran als for Storm Drim-ne M 7 rot $39,OQ0 0,00 S615,000 $G0,000 $330,OOQ for USA Muster Plan projects $615,000 geserve public f acihty Plan 2005-45 Reserve for a Major 14atntanan ce Dra. Totals for FY page D-2 Storm 1999-2000 Cpp1TAY- UaROVSMSITT pgOGRAM WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM >P;'6 cT DESC ON FY 1999-2000 WATER FUND • Replace 460 feet of 10-inch cast iron water main with 12-inch ductile iron; 460 feet of 8-inch cast iron main with 8-inch ductile iron; and 175 feet of 6-inch cast iron water main with 8-inch ductile iron Tiedeman Street at SW Walnut. This project is part of the Tiedeman/Fonner/Walnut intersection im water $90,000 project. on SW provement • Install 3,400 feet of 24-inch transmission main on SW Beef Bend Road from SW 131st Avenue to Arthur. This is to be completed during the County's project that will be funded by MSTIP 3. The County consists of widening Beef Bend road from two lanes to three, retaining walls, sidewalks, SW King $750,000 improvements and vertical and horizontal realignment. The County postponed this project during 1997 due to • Replace 800 feet of 6-inch cast iron water main with 6-inch ductile pipe on SW Lincoln Stree Greenburg Road to SW 91st Avenue. This is an on-going t from SW ductile iron pipe as program of replacing old cast iron water mains with $60,000 part of the City's street improvement program. • Construction of pressure reducing stations within the Bull Mountain system. The constructed as needed, when new subdivisions come on-line. reducing are 580 feet are serviced from the 713-foot service zone. On Bull Mountain propertiesebelow an elevation of $40,000 excessive and the operating (workin At an elevation of 430 feet, the water pressure becomes proposed subdivisions Au g) pressure must be reduced. Depending upon timing, we have identified two tumn Hill and Quail Hollow West) that would require pressure-reducing facilities. • Install 2,700 feet of 12-inch distribution main on SW 150th Avenue from Bull Mountain Road to (Bull Mountain system). Hawks Ridge $260 000 Install 1,450 feet of 12-inch transmission main on SW North Dakota between 115th and 121st Avenue com lete a 12-inch loo to SW Scholls Fe Road. . This will $140,000 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Total for FY 1999-2000 $1,340,000 Page E-1 of 4 APPENDIX lE S 85 000 S 0- 110 ~t • ,Ws project urham. the enue between Boni- da nn this estimate is 5954,400 win on SW 9thAvent pxolect. Intl water services- 135th Ol water m rovem of 33 SW y 20110" cast iron Street Impdram and relocati°n 121st &~ror►n Walnut street 4 000 feet of 8-mthce SW ?cam Avenue new fire by Street from art of the $565,400 Replace , on with Nation of a n SW Walnut cted asp con3uucri ts, insta along . constru is in ent of three fire by ~ia ion ma ,mss pxolect would ~ Barrows Road . replacem of 24- inch Vault. Walnut to SW $1,800,p00 feet and 2001 Avenue an SW 135th Avenue 2040- Install 5,604 V control srnission d PR 'Total for ~ an main from improvement project. inch trap • install feet of 16- $?60,444 Arthur to Bull W Beef Bend ROa$e watetransmissioz► to the tWee-phase pxolect to $1,400,400 g"5( 2001-fl2 sxnassion main 011 Bradley Corn of 24-inch ,s the second of a H`'f y 217 to Install 3,800 feet and 99W ain Roa Bull Mo twin. SW GCeenburg Roa andonem w meter Vault ($100,000) south $1,760,440 Oil ~f station side of B and a PR 2001-02 4-inch txansmtsZlj ($10 ,000) 'Total for Install 4,404 feet of 2 der Hwy un This would include a We $380,440 W Gaarde Street. 'This fain end Road to Road S to SW Gaaxde Street. fission main from SW Bull MBouneef B 2002-03 sin SW 131st Avenue on (~~f~~f4 feet of 24-inch tran o3ect from e install 1," a new 24-inch loop pr completes th ravement program ~P~~~. ~ 1999-2404 Capital Imp page E-2 of 4 ill p~t,®G s O 5320,000 A CT ~'ES orth Dakota e from SW Walnut Strsm~ss o vfac~ilities. Bull 2 000 on SW 121 st Avenu medium sired tran S25 3,30 water mau' ent from upon growth' on 0 feet of 12-inch ending additional reinfarcem 550 feet, depending ® lnsta11 This area was identified as n overflow elevation of 410 or $952,000 an 2002-(!3 d for a reservoir with Total for FY Reserve fun a Mountain. $300,000 end Road. SW Beef B . 9W from SW Canterbury of ouoservice area. This cost F'X 2003-04 water main on 9 the south S160,00 feet of 12-inch facilities to smisston SW 135th circulation Avenue to • Install 1,904 will reinforce trap from This water ma'' allowance fete a loop for SW Scholls Ferry s Rwilload comp includes a rock water main on $400,000 12-inch on SW Scholls FenY owth, on ~ Install 1,620 feet of ent complex Upon emergency access to apace' feet, depending elevation of 410 or 550 $860,000 this area. overflow Total for FY 2003-04 d for a reservoir with an • Reserve fun gull Viountaln $410,000 Road from SW 146th Avenue to SW on FY 2004-05 mission main Install 3 SW $eef Bend R 200 feet of 16-inch oir (410 zone)' 150th Avenue north to fliture resew 1999-200(1 Capital Improvement Program page p-3 of 4 WATER SYSTEM PROGRAM W it t Fcl~® T lll< ' Tz T i! ; j f t 6~L9TER F~~'~,~g~ L'Jl\$D • Construction of 1 million gallon reservoir on the northern flank of Bull Mountain with an overflow $1,300,000 elevation of 550 feet. Also included is a pumping station ($120,000) to transfer water from the 410 zone to the new reservoir. This is within the Bull Mountain system. s Install 1,500 feet of 4-inch water main on SW Scoffins Street. This is to replace an aging 4-inch cast $54,000 iron water main that has had increased maintenance this past year. Total for FY 2004-05 $1,764,000 FY 2005-06 • Install 3,200 feet of 16-inch transmission main on SW Beef Bend Road from SW 146th Avenue to SW $410,000 150th Avenue north to future reservoir (410 zone). • Reserve fund for a reservoir with an overflow elevation of 410 or 550 feet, depending upon growth, on $500,000 the southern flank of Bull Mountain. 'T'otal for FY 2004-05 $910,000 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page E-4 of 4 APPENDIX E s 1 IN 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program APPENDIX E . 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program , , I MEN= Appendix F CITY OF TIGARD FACT SHEET 13125 SW Ball Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Contact: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E., (503) 639-4171 AGENDA: June 23, 1998 TOPIC: 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program BACKGROUND: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes improvements to the streets, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, water and parks systems. The program is updated each year, and is reviewed and approved by the City Council. The CIP formulation is separate from the yearly operating budget process but proceeds on a parallel course and is approved on the same fiscal year basis as that budget. The formulation process begins with Citizen Involvement Team input followed by Planning Commission review and recommendation. The final step in this process is City Council review and approval. The CIP, through the adoption process, establishes the budget for each fiscal year and serves as a planning document to guide the infrastructure improvements over the following 6 years. The 1998-99 CIP documents outline the program and present the recommended projects for Fiscal Year 1998-99. Also included is a tentative list of projects for the following six years. The 1998-99 CIP was submitted to Planning Commission on May 20, 1998. At its meeting on June 1, 1998, Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed program with minor modifications to conform to the Finance Director's updated projections of funding availability. Council may make additional modifications to the plan during its review and approval process. The approved plan would be the approved Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 1998-99. COST: The 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program project amounts are based on the Finance Director's funding projections for Fiscal Year 1998-99. l:\ci tywide\facts\cip98 fct.doc AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF June _23, 1998 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUEIAGENDA TITLE 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program PREPARED BY: A.P. Duenas DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Adoption of the 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program and approval of the 1998-99 Projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, adopt the 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program as proposed in the attached memorandum dated June 2, 1998, with Appendices A through E. INFORMATION SiJMMARY Attached is a memorandum outlining the 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program. This memorandum presents the recommended projects for 1998-99 and a tentative list of projects for the following six years. The 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program was submitted to Planning Commission on May 20, 1998. At its meeting on June 1, 1998, the Planning commission recommended approval of the proposed program with minor modifications to conform to updated projections of funding availability. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Adopt the proposed Capital Improvement Program with additional modifications. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY The 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program supports the Tigard Beyond Tomorrow Transportation and Traffic goals of Improve Traffic Safety (all strategies in the plan) and Improve Traffic Flow (all strategies in the plan). FISCAL NOTES The 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program project amounts are based on the Finance Director's funding projections for Fiscal Year 1998-99. ~ry.„ewL„~pvs-vq as CITY OF 1TIGARD Shaping ,4 Better Community MEMORANDUM CI'T'Y OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Phone (503) 6394171 Fax (503) 684-7297 T®: City Council FROM: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E. City Engineer DA'L'E: June 2, 1998 SUBJECT: 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program This document presents the proposed 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for review and approval. The Planning Commission approved the 1998-99 CIP during its meeting of June 1, 1998, with minor modifications necessary to conform to the latest projections on funding availability. Background The long-term Capital Improvement Program, initially adopted by the City Council on August 23, 1994, identified projects for the 1994-95 CIP Program and proposed a list of projects for the next 6- year period. The Capital Improvement Program includes improvements to the streets, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, water and parks systems. The Engineering Department manages the street, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer CIP's. The Public Works Department manages the Water System CIP, while the Parks CIP is managed jointly by the Planning and Engineering Departments. The Capital Improvement Program is updated each year, and is reviewed and approved by the City Council. The CIP formulation is separate from the yearly operating budget process but is approved on the same fiscal year basis as the operating budget. While the program lists projects for subsequent fiscal years, the projects shown are tentative and are subject to change during the formulation process for each specific budget year. The CIP, through the adoption process, therefore establishes the budget for each fiscal year and serves as a planning document to guide the infrastructure improvements over the following 6 years. During each budget year's update, the revenue estimates are adjusted, the project cost estimates are reviewed, and the program and project priorities are re-evaluated based on changes in City plans, citizen input, and additional data which may become available. The 1996-97 CIP listed a 6-year program, the 1997-98 CIP tetumed to the 7-year period originally established in 1994. The 1998-99 CIP continues with the 7-year program projections. • Pedestrian Improvements (Grant Avenue). This project $ 30,000 will provide a pedestrian path along Grant Avenue connecting existing walkway along Park Street with School Street and providing pedestrian access to Charles F. Tigard Elementary School. • 79th Avenue (Design and Rights-off-Way). This project $ 100,000 will provide funding for selecting an engineering consultant firm to prepare the final design of the entire . street from Durham Road to Bonita Road. • Traffic Studies: These are funds that are committed for $ 40,000 completion of the Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update study, for the preparation of a regional transportation plan specifically focusing on the Washington Square area, and for the development of a feasible route to connect Dartmouth with Hunziker Street and Hall Boulevard south of City Hall. • Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PUMP) - This is a $ 500,000 program of corrective and preventive maintenance on all paved streets in Tigard. It addresses those streets that can still benefit from corrective or preventative action. There was a backlog of $1,500,000 in FY 97-98 for corrective overlays, repairs, and slurry seals and last year's program expended $320,000 from the $500,000 PMW budget. Last year's program included funding projections based on anticipated increase in the gas tax. That increase dad not materialize. Hence, the budget funding level was scaled back by $186,000 for all gas tax funded projects. Projects for this program will be drawn from the Pavement Overlay Backlog list (Appendix G), and from evaluation of those streets that need slurry seals to extend the pavement life expectancy. The list of AC overlay and slurry seal projects for this year's program is attached as Appendix J. 50 ,000 • Traffic Calming Program - This program provides funding for $ -70-ION installation of traffic calming devices on streets that have clearly demonstrated the need for installation of these devices. The program emphasis to date has been on the installation of speed humps. During FY 1998-99, a more comprehensive approach to traffic calming will be initiated in accordance with the Council goal for development of a Comprehensive Public Facility Plan for streets. Speed hump installation will continue to be the mainstay of the program until the comprehensive plan Memorandum to City Council 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Page 3 of 10 Recommended Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Projects TIF Funding can be used only for highway and transit capital improvements that provide additional capacity to major transportation systems. This funding is limited to major collector and arterial streets, and 50% must be spent on arterial streets. A major portion of these funds is being held in reserve until our transportation planning is completed. The Tigard Triangle area will need major improvements to develop streets to arterial and major collector standards. In addition, as the Walnut Island area is annexed, TIF funding will be required to improve 12181 Avenue, Gaarde Street and Walnut Street. The TIF reserve is currently large, and will grow even larger in the out years as shown in Appendix A. This increase in the reserve will most likely not occur as major projects are initiated and implemented once the transportation plan is completed. Significant drawdowns of the reserve amounts are expected in the next several years. The TIF-funded projects that are proposed for the next CIP Budget Year are as follows: Committed Projects: $ 761,920 • Greenburg Road/Mapleleaf Intersection - Construction $ 8,920 of this project began March 1998 and will be completed by December 1998. This project is Federally funded and the City's share of the project cost is $50,000. The sum of $41,080 has been expended for the project, and the remaining of $8,920 needs to be carried over to FY 98-99 to complete the construction. • Bonita Road from the Railroad Tracks to the Fanno $ 674,000 Creek - $800,000 was funded in FY 97-98. Phase I construction cost was $126,000, which included underground utilities. Phase 2 and 3 of this project will include replacement of the railroad crossings and street widening. Acquisition of right-of-way required for the widening is delayed due to the ongoing transfer of ownership between Burlington Northern Railroad and ODOT. Therefore, the construction of the next two phases of the project will be postponed until the spring of 1999. • Walnut Street/Tiedeman Avenue Intersection Realign- $ 79,000 meat and Signalization (Design) - This project was funded in the amount of $80,000 in FY 97-98 to design the realignment and signalization of the existing Walnut/ Tiedeman/Fonner Street intersection. A Request for Proposal was prepared to select a qualified consultant to design the project. Design is scheduled to begin in mid- June 1998. The amount of $79,000 will be needed for the consultant contract to complete the project design during FY 1998-99. Memorandum to City Council 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Page 5 of 10 PARKS SYSTEM PROGRAM 17 Attached as Appendix B is the parks component of the City's seven-year CIP, which begins July 1998. The list of projects in the proposed plan includes a single newly developed project: extending the existing Fanno Creek Park trail to connect with Main Street. In almost all other respects, the seven- year parks CIP is identical to last year's seven-plan, with the same projects listed by the same program year. Projects budgeted for last year but not anticipated to be completed by July 1, 1998 are listed as "committed projects". Projects identified during last year's C[P process for the 1998-99 program year are listed as "new projects". The reason for making only limited changes to the previous parks CIP at this time is that a comprehensive update of the city parks and open space master plan is currently underway. The revised master plan will look at the long-range needs of the community, identify future park sites, establish priorities for development, and recommend funding strategies to implement the plan. Methods for involving the public in the master plan process include interviews with community leaders, community workshops, a teacher-student outreach program, and a survey questionnaire distributed to 6,000 randomly selected households. Beginning in 1999, revisions to the parks CIP priorities will be developed within the framework of this newly developed plan. On the budget side, the CIP identifies additional unexpended Park Levy funds. Last year's budget assumed that $17,000 remained in unspent levy funds. New information indicates that $91,000 is left over from the 1989 levy. These funds have been allocated for 1998-99 Cook Park expansion projects. Cook Park projects proposed for next year include sportsfield development, parking area construction, restroom replacement, shelter construction, and water and irrigation line extensions. In summary, pending the completion of the parks and open space master plan now in progress, an essentially "no-change" parks CIP is proposed. No change means that the list and timing of projects in the current CIP is unchanged from the parks C[P as approved last year. Among the 1997-98 projects, completed projects are deleted and projects still in progress are carried over to 1998-99. SANI'T'ARY SEWER SYS'T'EM PROGRAM The sanitary sewer funding has funding sources that are reserved for maintenance repairs on currently unknown projects, capacity upgrades as recommended, from the USA Master Plan, and for the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program. A new program was created by City Council in FY 1997-98 to extend sewers into commercial areas. This new program is included in the 1998-99 CIP budget. The unrestricted portion of the Sanitary Sewer Fund can be used for repair and maintenance projects Citywide and for extension of the existing system to unsewered areas. In addition, one of the City Council goals is preparation of a Comprehensive Public Facility Plan for sewers, both storm and sanitary. Several studies will need to be performed in FY 1998-99 to obtain information necessary for preparation of the Sanitary Sewer Facility Plan. Funding for these studies is included in this budget. The detailed project listing for 1998-99 and the full 7-year program is attached as Appendix C. N Memorandum to City Council 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Page 7 of 10 111111 all The detailed project listing is attached as Appendix D. The projects currently proposed for CIP Budget , Year 1998-99 are as follows: • Committed Projects: • Park Street Drainage - Park Street Drainage is a major $ 86,000 drainage improvement project between 107th Avenue and Mira Court. The project design and rights-of-way acquisition have been completed and remaining funding will be carried forward into FY 1998-99 for construction implementation. The remaining funding is not sufficient to construct the project improvements. Additional funding is being requested for this project as shown below. • 118th CI'. Erosion Control - This is an erosion control $ 30,000 project that needs to extend the improvements further downstream to alleviate the heavy erosion on the side slopes and streambed. Design will begin in winter 1998 with project construction to follow in early summer 1999. • Park Street Drainage - The project funding of $95,000 in FY $ 35,000 97-98 is insufficient to complete the project. The project design required a drainage outfall adjacent to 110`' Avenue. As a result, the estimated project cost has increased by $35,000. This additional amount will supplement the project funding to allow construction in FY 1998-99. Advertisement for bids is scheduled for May 26, 1998, and construction is expected to begin in late July 1998. 0 Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program - This program $ 40,000 addresses minor storm drainage problems requiring more than normal maintenance effort. The program in FY 97-98 included minor drainage repairs totaling $21,000 on Main Street, View Terrace, and Pinebrook Street. The Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program for FY 98-99 is proposed at the same funding level as last year's program. The anticipated projects for FY 1998-99 include drainage repairs at Walnut Terrace (east of-69th), Durham Road at the Highway 99W intersection, and 115th and 116th Avenues. • Lincoln Street Drainage Improvements - The drainage system $ 60,000 upgrade on 91st Avenue, from Greenburg Road to Lincoln Avenue, has been included in the 91st Avenue improvement project. This project extends the drainage system upgrade along 91" Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to Commercial Street and provides a drainage outfall into the existing drainage ditch adjacent to Commercial Avenue. Memorandum to City Council 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Page 9 of 10 PROJEC r TIF GAS TAX OTHER FUDIDUIO Committed Projects Pod. Improvements - Grant Ave. 30,000 79th Avenue (Design and RM 100,000 Traffic Studies 40,000 Greenburg/Mapleleaf Intersection 8,920 Bonita Road - RR Tracks to Bridge 674,000 Walnut StreetlTiedeman Avenue 79,000 Intersection do Approaches (Design) 91 st Avenue Improvements from 188,000 (166,800 CDBG Greenburg Road to Lincoln Street funds, 21,200 City funds) TOTAL Committed Projects 761,920 170,000 188,000 FY 1998-99 Committed Projects 761,920 170,000 TIF Transit reserve 100,000 T[F reserve for future projects 1,538,080 Pavement Major Maintenance 500,000 Traffic Calming Program 46.009- tai O -304,)W Traffic Studies 360- 50i o Gaarde Street (Design and R/W) 500,000 Walnut Street/Tiedeman Avenue 800,000 Intersection & Approaches (Design, R/W and Construction) Totals for FY 1998-99 3,700,000 800,000 FY 1999-2000 TIF transit reserve 220,000 TIF reserve for future projects 3,380,000 Pavement Major Maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 79th Avenue (R/W and Construction) LID and Storm Drain Funds Traffic Calming Program 60,000 Tigard Street Bridge Replacement 180,000 Totals for FY 1999-00 3,600,000 590,000 1998-99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page A- I APPENDIX A 7~ PROJECT TIF GAS TAX OTHER FUNDING FY 2004-2005 TIF transit reserve 700,000 TIF reserve for future projects 7,700,000 Pavement Major Maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 Traffic Calming Program 60,000 HalUHunzikar/Scotfins 234,000 'T'otals for FY 2004-2005 8,400,000 644,000 l.kng*tiA 9&99cipVvicetskUmip99.doc 1998-99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page A-3 APPENDIX A PROJECTS METRO TIGARD PARK PARK SDC DONATION GRNSP GRNSP LEVY FY 2003-04 26. Fanno Creek Park Improvements 325,000 27. Tualatin. River Ped Bridge 100,000 FY 2004-05 28. Improvements to be determined from TBD Parks Master Plan "TIG333%USR%DEPTSXENG%GUS%98-99CI P%PARKSCIP.DOC 1998-99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page B-2 APPENDIX B r UNRESTRICTED SDC FY 2004-05 Major maintenance 40,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 2,930,000 5,285,000 Neighborhood and Commercial Area Sewer Extensions 200,000 Totals for FY 2003-04 3,170,000 5,285,000 "TIG333tUSRIDEPTS%ENG%GUS%99-99CDMSEWER%SASE99.DOC'9d•99CU'1SE WER%SASE99.DOC 1998-99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page C-2 APPENDIX C ~..c 1 ya .rt. LJIVIdF.STRICTEIID SDC FY 2003-04 Reserve for USA master plan 1,400,000 Storm Drainage Major Maintenance 40,000 Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects 484,000 Totals for FY 2003-04 524,000 1,400,000 FY 2004-05 Reserve for USA master plan 1,500,000 Storm Drainage Major Maintenance 40,000 Reserve for Public Facility Plan Projects 524,000 Totals for FY 2004-05 564,000 1,500,000 r %%TIG373WSRIDEPTSIENGZUS%96.99CIP %SDRAIN%STSEMS. DOC 1998-99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page D-2 APPENDIX D PROTECT DESCRIPTION WA''E1t FUND • Reserve fund for a reservoir with an overflow elevation of 550 feet on the 111,000 northern flank of Bull Mountain (Bull Mountain system). Total for FY 1999-2000 1,236,000 FY 2000-01 • Construction of a one-million gallon reservoir on the northern flank of Bull 1,300,000 Mountain with an overflow elevation of 550 feet. Also included is a pump- ing station ($120,000) to transfer water from the 410 zone to the new reservoir. This is within the Bull Mountain system. • • Install 4,000 feet of 244nch transmission main on SW Greenburg Road, from 1,000,000 Hwy 217 to Bradley Corner. This would include a bore under Hwy 217 (S 100,000) and a PRV station and new meter vault ($100,000). Total for FY 2000-01 2,300,000 FY 2001-02 • Install 3,200 feet of 16-inch transmission main on SW Beef Bend Road from 410,000 SW 146th Avenue to SW 150th Avenue north to future reservoir (410 zone). • Install 3,800 feet of 24-inch transmission main on SW Beef Bend Road from 760,000 SW King Authur to Bull Mountain Road and.99W. This is the second of a three phase project to increase water transmission to the south side of Bull Mountain. ► Total for FY 2001-02 1,170,000 FY 2002-03 • Install 1,900 feet of 24-inch transmission main from SW Bull Mountain Road 380,000 to SW Gaarde Street. This completes the new 24-inch loop project from SW 131st Avenue on Beef Bend Road to SW Gaarde Street. 1998-99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page E-2 APPEND[X E FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program APPENDIX G Pavement Corrective and Preventative Maintenance Backlog , , Summary Reconstruction Projects: $ 749,433 Resurfacing Projects (Overlay): $ 835,387 Slurry Seal Projects: $1,094,773 Grand Total: $2,679,593 L APPENDIX G Page 2 Date: 4/9/99 50:44:45 Page 1 of 1 Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 0 . TIGARD ENGINEERING City of Tigard Costs Updated: 1219198 7 9 0 0 0 - + 17500 + Pave Length Prelim Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO (ft) PCI Est $ 1 0 7 3 3 ' 199900008 79 TH AV CHURCHILL WY N 145 THURSTON DR N 0 RE MNMNP FLEX 1080 33 79000 3 5 2 0 0 ' 199900013 SCHOOL ST PACIFIC HW N 0 GRANT AV N 0 RE LNMNN FLEX 350 26 17500 9 9 3 3 3 4- 199900015 79 TH AV BOND ST N 145 CHURCHILL WY N 0 RE MNMNP FLEX 115 37 10733 6 3 3 3 3 L 199900021 121 ST AV SUMMERCRE DR N 0 SUMMER ST N 0 RE CNMNT FLEX 320 47 35200 4 1 6 0 0 199900025 79 TH AV GENTLEW00 DR N 145 MARA CT N 0 RE MNMNP FLEX 1490 47 99333 199900026 ROSS ST HALL BL E 0 81 ST AV E 0 RE MNMNP FLEX 950 47 63333 6 1 2 0 0 199900030 BONITA RD FANNO CRE BR E 0 RR CROSSI E 0 RE CNMIN FLEX 390 53 41600 5 8 6 6 7 199900032 FONNER ST 113 TH PL E 0 111 TH PL E 0 RE CNMW FLEX 680 54 61200 4 6 6 5 6 6 # 199900064 FONNER ST 115 TH AV E 0 115 TH AV E 800 RE CNMW FLEX 800 64 58667 e B Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions. All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed. NMI Date: 4/9/9910:54:9 Page 1 of 1 Project Candidate Summary Worksheet ~ o TIGARD ENGINEERING City of Tigard Costs Updated: 1219198 9 6 8 0 0 + Pave Length Prelim & 6 0 6 7 + Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPe (ft) PC[ Eat $ 3 7 4 0 0 + 199900001 BURNHAM ST ASH AV N 0 ASH AV N 760 RE CNCIT FLEX 760 28 96800 3 2 0 2 6 7 199900002 BURNHAM ST HALL BL N 0 ASH AV N 0 RE CNCIT FLEX 1205 30 186067 199900038 SCOFFINS ST ASH AV N 470 MAIN ST N 0 RS LNCIN FLEX 425 46 37400 199900057 ASH AV COMMERCIA ST N 165 SCOFFINS ST N 0 RO LNCIN FLEX 415 55 443 199900141 MAIN ST FANNO CRE BR E 0 SCOFFINS ST E 0 RO CNCIT FLEX 1795 78 3216 199900232 MAIN ST PACIFIC HW E 0 PACIFIC HW E 285 RO CNCIT FLEX 285 84 589 199900292 SCOFFINS ST HALL BL N 0 ASH AV N 155 RO LNCIN FLEX 625 82 479 199900327 BURNHAM ST ASH AV N 760 MAIN ST N 0 RO CNCIT FLEX 150 86 270 199900414 ASH AV HILL ST E 0 HILL ST E 270 DO MNCIN FLEX 270 71 0 199900430 ELECTRIC ST MAIN ST N 0 END N 0 DO LNCNN FLEX 180 74 0 199900435 MAIN ST PACIFIC HW E 285 FANNO CRE BR E 0 DO CNCIT FLEX 305 76 0 199900490 ASH AV END N 0 BURNHAM ST N 000 MNCIN FLEX 285 85 0 199900558 COMMERCIAL ST HALL BL N 0 MAIN ST N 285 DO MNCIT FLEX 1765 90 0 199900678 MAIN ST SCOFFINS ST E 0 PACIFIC HW E 0 DO CNCIT FLEX 550 85 0 199900780 TIGARD ST PACIFIC HW E 0 MAIN ST E 0 DO MNCIN FLEX 158 91 0 199900953 ASH AV HILL ST E 264 END E 0 DO MNCIN FLEX 53 95 0 199900954 ASH AV COMMERCIA ST N 0 COMMERCIA ST N 16500 LNCIN FLEX 165 93 0 Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cast assumptions. All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed. Date: 419/99 10:45:54 Page 1 of 1 Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 0 ~ TIGARD ENGINEERING Costs Updated: 12/9/98 city of Tigard 1 7 4 5 3 + 1 9 3 1 1 r Pave Length Prelim Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO (ft) PCI Est $ 1 6 4 2 7 199900375 BULL MOUNTAIN F ASPINE RI DR E 160 117 TH AV E 0 RS CFMNK FLEX 210 88 17453 1 0 0 2 2 199900168 WALNUT TE 69 TH AV E 0 69 TH AV E 395 RS LNMNN FLEX 395 76 19311 1 4 7 1 4 199900154 BOONESFERRY UI CITY LIMI N 0 CITY LIMI N 160 RS ANMIT FLEX 160 80 16427 1 3 c 8 9 199900153 136 TH CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 WALNUT LN N 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 205 74 10022 1 3 2 3 6 7 199900129 KATHERINE ST KAROL CT E 0 KAROL CT E 317 RS LNMNN FLEX 317 72 14714 199900125 CENTER ST 95 TH AV E • 0 95 TH AV E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 280 71 13689 3 1 6 8 0 199900095 BULL MOUNTAIN F 114 TH AV E 0 PACIFIC HW E 0 RS CFMNK FLEX 1425 71 132367 L 0 9 7 3 199900083 SPRUCE ST 89 TH AV E 0 HALL BL E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 720 62 31680 1 2 5 4 0 199900081 FERN ST CITY LIMI E 0 138 TH AV E 225 RS LNMNN FLEX 355 62 20973 5 1 0 7 6 199900079 95 TH AV END N 0 OAK ST N 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 285 61 12540 5 4 2 0 8 199900075 PINE ST 69 TH AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 815 60 31876 1 0 3 2 5 199900058 KABLE ST END E 0 END E 693 RS LNMNN FLEX 693 55 54208 5 5 7 3 3 199900040 THORN/81ST CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 THORN ST E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 106 47 10325 1 42 2 199900029 MEADOW ST TIEDEMAN AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 570 42 55733 199900028 70 TH AV OAK ST N 0 END N 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 515 41 20142 5 5 0 0 0. • 199900023 BOONESFERRY UI CITY LIMI N 160 DURHAM RD N 0 RS ANMIT FLEX 500 50 55000 1 6 3 C 4 199900020 115 TH AV NORTH DAK ST N 0 TIMOTHY PL N 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 230 35 16304 3 1 6 8 0 199900018 OAK ST 67 TH AV E 0 66 TH AV E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 360 34 31680 3 4 9 0 7 199900017 66 TH AV HAMPTON ST N 0 HAMPTON ST N 510 RS LNMIN FLEX 510 30 34907 1 3 7 2 8 0 199900010 BONITA RD INTERSTAT HW W 0 72 ND AV W 0 RS CNMIN FLEX 1170 40 137280 199900007 OAK ST 69 TH AV E 0 67 TH AV E 0 RS LNMNN FLEX 365 21 32120 3 2 1 2 " 199900004 NORTH DAKOTA S 121 ST AV E 0 119 TH AV E 0 RS MNMN1` FLEX 520 28 29236 c 9 2 3 6 7 9 7 9 8 7 Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions. All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed. 4653• Date: 419/9.910:47:41 Page 1 of 8 4 9 5 0 Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 1 3 5 3 , TIGARD ENGINEERING 2 6 3 7 + City of Tigard Costs updated: 1219198 1 7 8 5 a" 3 9 3 0 Pave Length Prelim 2 7 4 2 4 Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class Type (ft) PCI Est $ 199900006 NORTH DAKOTA S SCHOLLS F RD E 0 PRIVATE RD E 0 SE MNMIN FLEX 620 31 4653 2 5 2 0 199M12 TIEDEMAN AV MEADOW ST N 0 TIGARD ST N 0 SE CNMNN FLEX 990 40 4950 3 3 8 0 , 199900016 TIEDEMAN AV CITY LIMI N 0 CITY LIMI N 290 SE CNMND FLEX 290 42 1353 5 4 4 0 • 199900022 BELL CT . 127 TH AV N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 565 36 2637 2 3 9 3 . 199900034 MCKENZIE ST END N 0 PACIFIC HW N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 315 45 1785 1 5 1 199900035 106 TH AV NORTH DAK ST N 0 BLACK DIA WY N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 855 45 3930 199900036 DURHAM RD SUMMERFIE DR E 0 113 TH AV E 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 470 56 2742 2 B 6 l ' 199900037 GREENBURG RD CASCADE BL N 0 SHADY LN N 0 SE CNMIT FLEX 270 56 2520 3 9 7 6 ' 199900039 67 TH AV CLINTON ST N 0 END N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 845 46 3380 4 a 1 7 . 199900042 GREENBURG RD NORTH DAK ST N 0 ASH CREEK BR N 0 SE CNMIT FLEX 720 58 5440 1 3 6 0 199900043 66 TH AV HAMPTON ST N 510 FRANKLIN ST N 100 SE LNMIN FLEX 620 49 2893 9 1 5 , 199900044 121 ST AV SUMMER ST N 0 BURLHEIGH DR N 0 SE CNMN7 FLEX 275 58 1513 5 y 2 2 . 1999001145 BLACK DIAMOND 1 108 TH CT N 0 106 TH AV N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 505 50 2862 199900048 WALNUT ST BENISH ST E 0 135 TH AV E 0 SE CNMND FLEX 555 60 3978 1 5 4 0 _ 199900050 GARDEN PL GARDEN PL N 0 GARDEN PL N 850 SE MNMIN FLEX 850 58 4817 1 0 6 1 7 199900051 NORTH DAKOTA S GREENBURG RD E 1075 95 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 240 52 1360 3 6 4 3 • 199900052 69 TH AV DARTMOUTH ST N 145 CLINTON ST N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 305 52 915 6 7 0 0 199900053 SANDBURG ST 72 NO AV E 630 CUL-DESA E 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 935 53 5922 6 3 8 7 199900059 MARIE CT 128 TH AV E 0 CUL-DESA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 264 55 1540 3 1 2 0 199900060 NIMBUS AV CUL-DE-SA I d 0 SCHOLLS F RD N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 1300 55 10617 199900061 NORTH DAKOTA S GREENBURG RD E 390 GREENBURG RD E 1073 SE LNMNN FLEX 683 55 3643 3 4 5 199900065 NORTH DAKOTA S PRIVATE RD E 0 TIEDEMAN AV E 0 SE MNMIN FLEX 1340 62 6700 3 6 3 2 199900066 SHADY LN GREENBURG RD E 0 GREENBURG RD E 1000 SE MNMIN FLEX 1000 62 6387 1 9 3 0 . 199900067 FRANKLIN ST 68 TH AV E 0 66 TH AV E 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 520 56 3120 1 0 5 199900068 92 ND AV PARKING L N 0 PARKING L N 335 SE MNMNP FLEX 335 63 2345 2 8 9 0 199900069 TIGARD ST SUMMERCRE DR E 0 115 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1056 57 5632 1 6 s 0 199900070 BONITA RD RR CROSSI E 0 INTERSTAT HW E 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 1990 65 1393( 199900072 NORTH DAKOTA S 119 TH AV E 0 115 TH AV E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX. 810 64 310! 4 5 0 5 ' 199900073 SPRINGWOOD DR COTTONWOO LN E 0 IRONWOOD LP E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 510 64 289 5 5 7 3 199900077 72 ND AV PINE ST N 0 OAK ST N 0 SE CNMNN FLEX 420 67 168 4 4 3 5 . 1999D0078 85 TH AV CITY LIMI N 605 DURHAM RD N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 795 60 45C 1 3 3 7 5 2 199800085 66 TH AV 68 TH PW N 0 HAMPTON ST N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 1045 62 55, 199900088 WALNUT ST PATHFINDE CT E 0 GRANT AV E 0 SE CNMN 1 FLEX 950 69 4435 Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions. All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed. 7 1 1 3 . Date: 4/9/9910:47:41 Page 2 of 8 5, 5 0 0 Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 1 3 2 6 TIGARD ENGINEERING 1 9 0 1 • City of Tigard 3 3 5 5 ' Costs Updated: 1219198 62 2 2 Pave Length Prelim i t 8 8 Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO (ft) PCI Est $ 195900090 121 ST AV NORTH DAK ST N 0 MANZANITA CT N 665 SE CNMNT FLEX 970 70 7113 1 7 7 6 7 ' 199900091 121 ST AV SPRINGW00 DR N 0 SCHOLLS F RD N 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 750 70 5500 6 4 3 5 199900100 PFAFFLE ST HALL BL E 0 HALL BL E 215 SE MNMIN FLEX 215 70 1326 1 7 5 0 • 1 199900104 KAROL CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 KATHERINE ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 317 66 1901 4 1 6 3 • 199900106 130 TH PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 MORNINGST DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 610 66 3355 4 5 0 0 199900109 68 TH PW 66 TH AV N 0 HAMPTON ST N 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 1525 73 6222 3 3 4 3 ° 199900112 ELMHURST ST 72 ND AV E 0 70 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 515 67 1288 199900113 GREENBURG RD LINCOLN AV N 0 98 TH AV N 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 2150 74 15767 1 5 1 5 2 - ' 199900115 FREWING ST ASH AV N 0 PACIFIC HW N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1430 68 6435 5 0 9 7 199900116 126 TH AV KAREN ST N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 375 68 1750 7 3 9 9 • ` 199900117 NORTH DAKOTA S 108 TH AV E 0 PRIVATE RD E 0 SE MNMNP F' EX 785 73 4163 6 2 4 0 ° 199900118 DURHAM RD 74 TH AV E 0 BOONESFER RD E 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 450 75 4500 4 6 5 7 199900119 KATHERINE ST 131 ST AV E 0 128 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 590 70 3343 7 4 1 3 199900122 DURHAM RD SERENA CT E 0 92 ND AV E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 2020 75 15152 199900123 GAARDE ST 118 TH CT E 0 114 TH AV E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 1390 76 5097 4 7 9 2 199900124 72 ND AV OAK ST N 321 VENTURA DR N 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 1087 74 5399 1 5 7 5 199900128 BONITA RD 79 TH AV E 0 MILTON CT E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 1170 76 6240 5 4 7 5 • 199900130 108 TH AV TITAN LN N 0 DURHAM RD N 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 880 76 4657 1 3 4 9 3 199900131 98 TH AV DURHAM RD N 0 SUMMERFIE DR N 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 1160 77 7413 5 8 6 7 199900132 PARK ST DERRY DEL CT E 0 WATKINS AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1250 72 4792 8 6 7 199900133 TIEDEMAN AV CITY LIMI N 195 106 TH A'✓ N 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 225 77 1575 199900135 PARK ST WATKINS AV E 0 GRANT AV E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 695 76 3475 1 4 1 0 199900136 DURHAM RD 92 ND AV E 0 HALL BL E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 1799 78 13493 5 6 0 2 199900137 GREENBURG RD CENTER ST N 0 LINCOLN AV N 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 800 78 5867 1 8 8 2 5 + 199900139 CLINTON ST 69 TH AV E 0 68 TH AV E 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 260 73 867 9 1 0 3 ; 199900142 OAK ST 66 TH AV E 0 65 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 235 73 1410 S 9 2 5 139900143 PFA.°FLE ST 81 ST AV E 0 PACIFIC HW E 0 SE MNMIN FLEX 1130 77 5602 2 9 9 7 ° 199900144 DURHAM RD 113TH AV E 0 SERENA CT E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX 2510 78 18825 199900145 MCDONALD ST 93 RD AV E 0 HALL BL E 0 SE CNMNP FLEX "1830 78 9193 6 3 0 7 199900146 WATKINS AV WATKINS PL N 0 WALNUT ST N 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 1185 77 5925 1 2 2 7 199900152 114 TH PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 TIGARD ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 580 74 2997 1 8 8 1 7 4 # 199900155 CASCADE BL GREENBURG RD N 2490 GREENBURG RD N 3370 SE CNMIN FLEX 880 80 6307 199900156 PARK ST GRAM AV E 0 PACIFIC HW E 0 SE MNMIN FLEX 175 78 1225 Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions. All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed. • ~ Date: 4/9!9910:47:41 Page 3 of 8 0 Project Candidate Summary Worksheet TIGARD ENGINEERING 1 0 0 5 3 City of Tigard 3 1 6 8 Costs Updated: 1219198 1 3 5 3 Pave Length Prelim 3 2 3 8 Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPe (n) PCI Est $ 4 6 2 0 • 199900157 SUMMERCREST D TIGARD DR E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 BE LNMNN FLEX 1885 75 10053 2 8 0 5 4- 199900158 WALNUT ST GRANT AV E 0 PACIFIC HW E O SE CNMNT FLEX 475 80 3168 199900160 78 TH AV PFAFFLE ST N 1195 SPRUCE ST N O SE LNMNN FLEX 280 75 1353 1 5 5 8 199900162 DERRY DELL CT PARK ST E 0 WATKINS AV E O SE LNMNN FLEX 925 75 3238 6 9 7 9 199900163 MAN2ANITA ST 119 TH AV E 0 115 TH AV E O SE I NMNN FLEX 840 75 4620 1 2 0 8 199900165 108 TH AV END N 0 BLACK DIA WY N O SE LNMNN FLEX 495 75 2805 6 7 5 ° 199900166 108 TH CT BLACK DIA WY N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 BE LNMNN FLEX 275 75 ?558 5 6 8 3 - 199900167 MORNINGSTAR DF WOODSHIRE LN E 0 CUL-DE-SA E O SE LNMNN FLEX 1675 76 6979 7 3 3 8 199900169 COMMERCIAL ST' 95TH AV N 585 98 TH AV N 0 BE MNMIN FLEX 250 80 1208 199900170 FONNER ST 111 TH PL E 0 CITY LIMI E 0 BE CNMND FLEX 150 81 675 9 3 5 199900171 NORTH DAKOTA S PRIVATE RD E 0 ANTON DR E 0 BE MNMNP FLEX 775 80 5683 1 4 0 8 199900173 PATHFINDER WY CUL-DE-SA E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 BE LNMNN FLEX 1295 77 7338 2 4 6 5 199900174 BLACK DIAMOND 1 PONDEROSA PL- N 0 PONDEROSA PL N 165 BE LNMNN FLEX 165 77 935 8 5 3 • 199900175 MANZANITA CT 121 ST AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 BE LNMNN FLEX 264 77 1408 1 5 3 0 • 199900176 MERESTONE CT CUL-DE-SA E 0121 ST AV E 0 BE LNMNN FLEX 435 77 2465 3 8 5 3 - 199900177 MURDOCK ST 106 TH AV E 0 END E O SE LNMNN FLEX 160 77 853 103;• 199900178 PONDEROSA PL BLACK DIA WY N 0 GUL-DE-SA N 0 BE LNMNN FLEX 270 77 1530 199900179 SERENA WY PICKS CT E 0 GRIMSON CT E 0 BE LNMNN FLEX 680 77 3853 1 b 5 199900180 STEVEN CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 CRESMER DR N 0 BE LNMNN FLEX 230 77 1035 7 0 0 ° 199900181 SUMMERCREST P CUL-DE-SA N 0 SUMMERCRE DR N 0 BE LNMNN FLEX 310 77 1653 3 9 2 4 199900182 FONNER ST 115 TH AV E 800 E 0 BE CNM* FLEX 175 82 700 6 7 7 7 199900185 HAMPTON ST 68 TH PTV E 0 66 TH AV E 225 SE CNMIN FLEX 755 82 3924 1 5 0 0 ° 199900186 LOCUST ST GREENBURG RD E 0 92 NO AV E 0 BE CNMIN FLEX 1070 82 6777 199900187 MURDOCK ST 98 TH AV E 0 97 TH AV E 0 BE CNMNP FLEX 300 82 1500 1 6 b 7 199900188 OAK ST 72 NO AV E 0 71 ST AV E 0 BE CNMNh FLEX 460 82 1687 1 6 6 3 199900189 WALNUT ST BARROWS (RD E 0 SHOPPING E 0 BE CNMNP FLEX 260 82 1863 1 6 4 8 199900190 WALNUT ST SHOPPING E 0 NORTHVIEW DR E 0 BE CNMN7 FLEX 230 82 1648 7 0 0 199900191 69 TH AV PACIFIC HW N 0 PACIFIC HW N 140 BE CNMIN FLEX 140 82 700 . 1 6 6 0 - 199900192 71 ST AV PINE ST N 0 OAK ST N 0 BE CNMNh FLEX 415 82 1660 1 6 0 O 199900193 72 ND AV BAYLOR ST N 1190 VILLA RID WY N 0 BE CNMN( FLEX 150 82 1600 199900194 OAK ST GREENBURG RD E 0 95 TH AV E 380 BE MNMIT FLEX 1085 81 6329 6 3 2 9 199900195 BENCHVIEW TE ALPINE VI CT E 0 BRIM PL E 525 BE MNMNP FLEX 2495 81 16218 1 6 2 1 b 199900196 COLONY CREEK C CUL-DE-SA E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 BE LNMNN FLEX 850 78 3967 3 9 6 7 1109b3~ Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions. All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed. 1 3 3 3 Date: 4/9/9910:47:41 Page 4 of 8 1 9 8 9+ Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 4 5 1 8 1 TIGARD ENGINEERING 2 3 4 0 City of Tigard Costs Updated: 1219198 9 5 3 - 1 5 b 3 Pave Langth Prelim Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO. (ft) PCI Est $ 1 1 9 0 199900197 87 TH AV PACIFIC HW N 0 CENTER ST N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 250 78 1333 6 2 0 5 199900200 116 TH AV END N 0 TIGARD DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 385 78 1989. 8 1 8 0 199900203 BENCHVIEW TE BULL MOUN RD E 0 ALPINE VI E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 695 82 4518 1 1 5 3 8 199900204 MISTLETOE DR HILLSHIRE DR N 0 BENCHVIEW CT N 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 360 82 2340 7 0 9 a 199900205 PFAFFLE ST 83 RD AV E 125 82 ND AV E 0 SE MNMIN FLEX 220 82 953 d 8 0 199900206 SATTLER ST 100TH AV E 195 98 TH AV E 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 475 82 1583 199900207 SERENA CT SERENA WY N 0 DURHAM RD N 0 SE MNMNP FLEX 210 82 1190 2 1 7 5 ' 199900210 WINTERLAKE DR SHORE DR N 0 WINTERLAK CT N 295 SE MNMNP FLEX 1000 82 6205 1 6 7 4 ° 199900211 EDGEWOOD ST OMARA ST E 0 OMARA ST E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 2670 79 8180 6 1 3 3 199900212 WALNUT ST NORTHVIEW DR E 0 135 TH AV E 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 1610 83 11538 2 2 6 7 + 199900213 115TH AV TIMOTHY PL N 0 SPRINGWOO DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1535 79 8098 1 3 6 0 199900214 76 TH AV VARNS ST N 0 CRESTVIEW ST N O SE LNMNN FLEX 330 80 880 2 4 3 7 199900215 91 ST AV GREENBURG RD N 0 CUL-DE-SA N O SE LNMNN FLEX 725 80 2175 199900216 CORYLUS CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 HAZELTREE TR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 372 80 1674 2 2 3 8 199900217 GARDEN PARK PL 110 TH AV E 0 110TH AV E 1115 SE LNMNN FLEX 1115 80 6133 2 1 0 0 199900218 JULIA PL CUL-DE-SA E 0 93 RD AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 400 80 2267 1 7 0 7 1 199900219 LEHMAN ST GREENBURG RD E 0 GREENBURG RD E 255 SE LNMIN FLEX 255 80 1360 2 0 u 7 199900220 MARTHA ST COPPER CR DR E 175 93 RD AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 430 80 2437 1 9 5 4 6 199800221 MILLEN DR 93 RD AV E 0 92 ND AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 395 80 2238 199900223 SCOTT CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 98 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 450 80 2100 6 2 6 2 199900224 113TH PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 320 SE LNMNN FLEX 320 80 1707 7 9 3 3 199900225 123 RD CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 KATHERINE ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 430 80 2007 2 9 4 7 - 199900226 HILLSHIRE DR CUL-DE-SA N 0 BLUE GUM CT N 890 SE MNMNP FLEX 3175 83 19546 2 1 3 3 . 199900227 SERENA WY WOODCREST AV E 0 PICKS CT E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1105 80 6262 1 4 9 6 , 199900228 93 RD AV CUL-DE-SA N 0 MARTHA ST N 305 SE LNMNN FLEX 1400 80 7933 1 6 0 0 199900229 MILLEN DR COPPER CR DR E 0 MILLEN/94 CT E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 520 80 2947 3 2 8 2 199900230 CARDINAL LN SEQUOIA P E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 400 84 2133 199900231 GAARDE ST 121 ST AV E 0 121 ST AV E 264 SE CNMN~ FLEX 264 84 1496 1 4 5 8 199900233 121 ST AV MERESTONE CT N 0 SUMMERCRE DR N 0 SE CNMNT FLEX 300 84 1600 1 9 0 1 199900234 68 TH PW HAMPTON ST S 0 66 TH AV S 0 SE CNMIN FLEX 895 84 3282 1 2 8 S 6 199900235 BOXELDER ST HILLSHIRE DR N 0 MINT PL N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 265 81 1458 1 3 4 3 2 9 # 199900236 PATHFINDER CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 WALNUT ST E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 422 81 1901 199900237 IRONWOOD LP SPRINGW00 DR N 0 SPRINGW00 DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 2270 81 12866 Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions. All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed. loom 10200.1 Date: 4/9/9910:47:41 Page 5 of 8 4 5 7 9. 1 Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 1 3 8 5 5 TIGARD ENGINEERING 1 2 5 0 City of Tigard 2 4 3 7 Costs Updated: 1219/98 1 5 8 7 Pave Length Prelim 2 1 5 3 Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO (ft) PCI Est $ 1 3 2 0 199900238 RIVERWOOD LN RIVERWOOD PL E 130 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1825 81 10200 199900240 CANTERBURY LN PACIFIC HW E 0 109 TH AV E 0 SE MNMNt FLEX 785 84 4579 3 6 5 $ j 199900244 COTTONWOOD LN 115 TH AV N 0 SPRINGW00 DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 2445 82 13855 1 6 0 0 199900245 76 TH AV END N 0 SPRUCE ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 250 '82 1250 1 9 1 7 7 199900246 86 TH AV INEZ ST N 0 GREENSWAR LN N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 430 82 2437 5 9 2 2 199900247 87 TH CT INEZ ST N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 280 82 1587 4 6 2 0 199900249 93 RD AV NORTH DAK ST N 0 END N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 380 82 2153 2 0 0 7 199900250 98 TH AV COMMERCIA ST N 0 LONDON CT N 165 SE LNMNN FLEX 240 82 1320 199900251 ALPINE VIEW BENCHVIEW TR E 0 MISTLETOE DR E 490 SE LNMNN FLEX 665 82 3658 3 L 2 3 199900252 ALPINE VIEW CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 BENCHVIEW TR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 300 82 1600 1 4 2 3 199900253 ASCENSION DR MISTLETOE DR N 0 WALNUT LN N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 4180 82 19177 5 2 0 199900254 ASHFORD ST 76 TH AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1045 82 5922 1 6 1 5 199900256 BENISH ST WALNUT ST E 0 MORNING H DR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 840 82 4620 3 0 8 0 199900257 BEREA DR CRESMER DR E 0 GARRETT ST E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 430 82 2007 3 1 1 7 - 199900258 BRIM PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 BENCHVIEW TR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 695 82 3823 199900259 BROADMOOR PL END N 0 WHITEHALL LN N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 305 82 1423 3 1 2 7 199900262 CLINTON ST 67 TH AV E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 130 82 520 6 5 0 199900264 COOK LN 107 TH AV E 0 WATKINS AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 495 82 1815 1 2 3 2 199900265 FAIRVIEW LN FAIRVIEW CT N 0 CUL•DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 560 82 3080 4 9 7 3 199900266 FANNO CREEK LP FANNO CRE CT E 0 FANNO CRE DR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 550 82 3117 1 7 6 0 199900267 GARRE17 ST ASH AV N 0 CRESMER DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 690 82 3127 3 2 1 d 199900268 GENTLEWOODS D ASHFORD ST N 0 ASHFORD ST N 150 SE LNMNN FLEX 150 82 850 199900269 GREENLEAF CT GREENS WY E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 264 82 1232 4 9 7 6 199800270 GREENFIELD DR RIDGEFIEL LN N 455 BENC'rlVIEW TR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 765 82 4973 7 4 8 ' 199900273 KENT PL CUL-DE-SA E 0 GREENLAND DR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 440 82 1760 1 1 2 0 199900274 LEAH TE END E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 585 82 3218 1 3 1 3 . 199900275 LIDEN DR WILTON AV E 165 MARCIA DR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 905 82 4978 6 6 a 3 199900276 LUKAR CT ASCENSION DR E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 195 82 748 6 0 3 5 199900277 MILLEN/94TH CT MILLEN DR N 0 MILLEN DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 240 82 1120 199900278 MISTLETOE DR ASCENSION DR N 0 ESSEX DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 255 82 1318 5 3 9 0 199300279 MISTLETOE DR ASCENSION DR N 0 HILLSHIRE DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1615 82 8883 1 3 1 7 7 5 # 199900280 MISTLETOE DR BENCHVIEW CT N 0 ALPINE N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1065 82 6035 199900284. MURDOCK ST 103 RD AV E 0 98 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1470 82 5390 Pr*d Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions. All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed. Date: 4/9/9910:47:41 Page 6 of 8 2 3 0 + Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 2 6 4 6 - TIGARD ENGINEERING 4 3 2 0 City of Tigard 6 1 0 Costs Updated: 1219198 1 2 9 3 = Pave Length Prelim 3 9 7 . Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYRO (n) PCI Eat $ 199900282 NORTHVIEW DR 140 TH TE E 320 MARCIA DR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 460 82 2530 3 4 5 3 199900283 OAK ST 71 ST AV E 0 69 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 635 82 2646 3 1 6 3 199900284 OAKTREE LN ALDERBROO CR N 0 ALDERBROO DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 810 82 4320 6 7 8 199900285 OXALIS TE ASCENSION DR N 0 END N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 180 82 810 6 6 8 199900286 RACELY PL LEAH TE N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 235 82 1293 1 8 9 8 ' 199900287 RIDGEFIELD LN END E 0 WiLMINGTO LN E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 85 82 397 1 8 4 3 • 199900288 RIDGEFIELD LN WILMINGTO LN N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 740 82 3453 9 2 3 6 199900289 ROCKINGHAM DR END E 0 132 ND AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 730 82 3163 199900293 STARVIEW DR END E 0 END E 170 SE LNMNN FLEX 170 82 878 5 6 0 - 199900294 TALON LN AERIE DR E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 125 82 688 1 3 6 0 199900295 TANGELA CT 95 TH AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 335 82 1898 i 0 8 5 199900296 TANOAK CT BRIM PL E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 335 82 1843 2 0 9 7 199900297 TERRACE TRAILS CUL-DE-SA N 0 115 TH AV N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1600 82 9236 1 7 9 8 - 199900299 VARNS ST 72 ND AV E 550 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 140 82 560 1 1 6 7 199900300 WAGONER PL MISTLETOE DR E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 255 82 1360 1999x0301 WALNUT LN ASCENSION DR E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 210 82 1085 2 6 6 0 199900302 WATKINS PL CUL-DE-SA E 0 WATKINS AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 370 82 2097 2 0 5 6 - 199900303 WELLINGTON PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 ROCKINGHA DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 415 82 1798 1 0 5 0 • 199900304 WHITEHALL LN 135 TH AV E 0 BROADMOOR PL E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 250 82 1167. 2 3 3 3 • - 199900305 WHITECEDAR PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 BENCHVIEW TR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 520 82 2860 2 4 9 7 199900306 WILMINGTON LN END N 0 RIDGEFIEL LN N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 475 82 2058 1 8 3 0 3 3 199900307 WINTERLAKE CT CUL•DE-SA E 0 WINTERLAK DR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 225 82 1050 199900308 WOODSHIRE LN MORNINGST DR E 0 FERNRIDGE TE E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 560 82 2333 9 3 5 ' 199900309 122 ND CT KATHERINE ST N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 535 82 2497 1 3 7 5 199900310 123 RD AV WALNUT ST N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 340 82 183033 9 3 0 199900311 123 RD TE GAARDE ST N 0 AERIE DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 170 82 935 6 5 0 199900312 124 TH AV AERIE DR E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 250 82 1375 2 7 0 0 199900313 129 TH AV MORNINGST DR N 0 END N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 180 82 930 199900314 133 RD AV BENISH ST N 0 BENISH ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 150 82 850 1 5 2 1 199900317 71 ST AV PACIFIC HW N 0 SPRUCE ST N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 450 82 2700 9 3 3 - 199900318 71 ST AV SPRUCE ST N 0 PINE ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 415 82 1522 3 1 1 7 199900319 71 ST AV OAK ST N 0 MAPLELEAF ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 400 82 933 2 4 7 4 1 5 • # 199900320 FIR LP 72 ND AV E 0 72 ND AV E 0. SE LNMIN FLEX 935 82 3117 Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions. All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed. 5800.1 Date: 4/9/9910:47:41 Page 7 of 8 6 3 6 5 _ Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 1 4 3 0 TIGARD ENGINEERING 4 0 2 3 City of Tigard Costs Updated: 12/9/98 3 4 1 3 223. Pave Length Prelim 7 Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO (n) PCI Est 3 9 3 0 9 . 199900321 GREENLEAF TR SUMMERFIE DR E 0 GREENS WY E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1220 82 5800 4 3 4 7 199900322 AERIE DR TALON LN E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1510 83 8305 5 0 3 4 199900323 BLUE GUM CT HILLSHIRE DR N 0 CUL-DESA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 260 83 1430 4 1 0 is 199900325 FANNO CREEK CT FANNO CRE LP N 0 FANNO CRE DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 710 83 4023 1 1 0 2 2 199900326 KABLE ST HOODVIEW DR E 0 100 TH AV E 330 SE LNMNN FLEX 640 83 3413• 7 3 7 199900328 GAARDE ST 121 ST AV E 165 118 TH CT E 0 SE CNMNf` FLEX 610 86 2237 199900329 SUMMERCREST D NORTH DAK ST E 0 121 ST AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1729 83 9309 2 3 8 3 198900330 WALNUT ST 124 TH PL E 0 122 ND AV E 0 SE CNMNI~ FLEX 1003 86 4347 c 0 7 0 199900332 WALNUT ST 116 TH AV E 0 112 TH AV E 0 SE CNMN7 FLEX 1162 86 5034 3 6 5 0 199900333 72 ND AV DARTMOUTH ST N 0 CLINTON ST N 0 SE CNMNI` FLEX 465 86 4108 9 3 5 199900334 COPPER CREEK C RIVERWOOD LN N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1945 83 11022 0 199900336 88 TH AV REILING ST N 0 END N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 130 84 737 1 2 0 0 199900337 89 TH PL CUL-DE-SA N 0 CUL-DESA N 550 SE LNMNN FLEX 550 84 2383 199900339 AMBIANCE PL GENESIS LP N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 460 84 2070 1 6 0 0 1999900342 FALCON RISE DR MORNING H DR E 0 MORNING H DR E 730 SE MNMNf FLEX 730 86 3650 2 8 7 8 199900343 FANNO CREEK DR 80 TH CT E 145 FANNO CRE PL E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 165 84 935 2 0 9 4 - 199900344 FANNO CREEK DR FANNO CRE CT E 0 COLONY CR CT E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 220 84 0 1 6 4 3 . 199900345 FERN ST 138 T H AV E 225 CITY LIMI E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 400 84 1200 1 0 1 3 3 _ 199900347 GREENLEAF TR GREENS WY W 470 GREENS WY W 870 SE LNMNN FLEX 400 84 1600 199900349 KNOLL DR HALL BL E 0 HUNZIKER ST E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 785 84 2878 1 8 4 _ s 199900350 LAKEWOOD CT IRONWOOD LP N 0 CUL-DE-SA N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 370 84 2094 1 6 2 3 199900351 MARA CT CUL-DE-SA E 0 79 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 290 84 1643 1 2 3 8 • 199900352 MILTON CT BONITA RD N 0 CUL-DESA N 0 SE LNMIN FLEX 1520 84 10133 6 4 0 • 199900353 MINT PL BOXELDER ST E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 335 84 1843 d 0 0 • 195900354 MOUNTAIN RIDGE CUL-DESA E 0 134 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 295 84 1623 3 6 5 5 199900355 NOVA CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 GENESIS LP N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 275 84 1238 199900356 PICKS CT 103 RD AV E 125 SERENA WY E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 120 84 640 1 0 6 0 199900357 PICKS CT SERENA WY E 0 SERENA WY E 200 SE LNMNN FLEX 200 84 800 7 9 3 199900358 REILING ST 88 TH AV E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 645 84 3655 6 4 0 - 199900359 SYLVAN CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 SERENA WY N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 265 84 1060 3 0 9 8 , 199900360 TIGARD ST TIEDEMAN AV E 0 TIEDEMAN AV E 170 SE MNMIN FLEX 170 86 79: 1 0 3 7 4 1 199900365 WILLOWBROOK DI END E 0 109 TH AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 120 84 64( 199900368 100 TH AV LADY MARI DR N 140 MURDOCK ST N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 845 84 3098 Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions. All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed. Date: 41919910:47:41 Page 8 of 8 Project Candidate Summary Worksheet 0 ~ TIGARD ENGINEERING City of Tigard Costs Updated: 1219198 1 0 5 0 Pave Length Prelim 2 0 9 4 Priority Road Name From Offset To Offset Act Class TYPO (ft) PCI Est $ 2 1 1 5 199900371 69 TH AV HAMPTON ST N 0 HAMPTON ST N 175 SE LNMIN FLEX 175 84 1050 6 6 8 5 199900372 ASHBURY LN SWENDON LP E 0 SWENDON LP E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 370 85 2094 2 1 4 5 199900373 FERNRIDGE TE END N 0 MORNINGST OR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 470 85 2115 5 0 2 3 199900374 WAVERLY DR 92 NO AV E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 1215 85 6885 199900376 GAARDE ST 110 TH AV E 0 110 TH AV E 330 SE CNMIN FLEX 330 88 2145 1 9 9 ' 199900377 HAMPTON ST 72 NO AV E 0 70 TH AV E 0 SE CNMIT FLEX 685 88 5023 1 3 2 0 199900379 BASSWOOD CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 IRONWOOD LP N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 352 86 1995 2 9 4 7 199900380 BOXELDER ST MINT PL N 0 ESSEX DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 240 86 1320 6 7 4 5 199900381 CHIMNEY RIDGE C MORNING H DR E 0 131 ST AV E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 520 86 2947 1 5 3 0 199900382 ESSEX DR HILLSHIRE DR N 0 BOXELDER ST N 170 SE LNMNN FLEX 1590 86 8745 3 9 $ 8 199900383 FANNO CREEK LP CUL-DE-SA E 0 CUL-DE-SA E 270 SE LNMNN FLEX 270 86 1530 199900384 MARCIA DR 139 TH AV E 100 LIDEN DR E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 725 86 3988 2 3 7 6 199900386 118TH CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 SPRINGWOO DR N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 475 86 2376 1 5 9 d 199900387 FAIRVIEW CT CUL-DE-SA N 0 FAIRVIEW LN N 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 355 88 1598 7 9 3 ; 199900389 WEAVER WY FANNO CRE DR E 0 END E 0 SE LNMNN FLEX 140 88 793 4 4 6 0 4 0 V 133752•, 1 b 8 1 4 110963 134329•, 131775•.. 2 4 7 4 1 5, 1 0 3 7 4 1 4 4 6 0 4 1G94773~ Project Candidates on this Worksheet are based on visual condition ratings, engineering assumptions, and cost assumptions. All assumptions should be verified and updated as needed. MM-M QTY OF TIGARD MARCH 4.1999 CA PIiAL IMPROV~M~NT PAakliuAr'%GRAM OVERVIEW IFY 1999---9000 Von/ 1 Appendix H TABLE OF CONTENTS City of Tigard CAPITAL, IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW Page Number Background 1 Process 1 Funding 2 Policy Issues 2 Program Areas 2 Pavement Major Maintenance Program 2 The Speed Hump Program 3 Stone Drainage Major Maintenance Program 3 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program 3 Major Street Capital Improvement Program 3 Bridge Replacement Program 3 Surface Water Management Funding Program 4 Storm Drainage Capital Improvement Program 4 Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Program 4 Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program 4 Parks Program 4 Water System Improvement Program 4 Program Highlights 4 Street Projects 4 Drainage Projects 7 Other projects 7 Proposed Priority Areas for FY 1999-2000 8 What's Next? 9 Capital Improvement Program Overview APPENDIX H CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Overview and Status Report) March 4, 1999 The summer and fall of 1998 have been subsequent fiscal years, the projects shown extremely busy with the implemention and are tentative and are subject to change during completion of pavement overlay and slurry the formulation process for each specific seal projects. In addition, the Engineering budget year. The CIP, through the adoption Department has initiated design work on the process, therefore establishes the budget for realignment of Walnut Street at Tiedeman each fiscal year and serves as a planning Avenue and the reconstruction and widening document to guide the infrastructure of 79`h Avenue. Furthermore, the Engineering improvements over the following 6 years. Department has established an ambitious schedule for the coming months that would During each budget year's update, the ensure timely implementation of projects revenue estimates are adjusted, the project during the heart of the construction season cost estimates are reviewed, and the program next spring and summer. The purpose of this and project priorities are re-evaluated based briefing is provide an overview of the Capital on changes in City plans, citizen input, and Improvement Program, to update the citizens additional data which may become available. of Tigard on the accomplishments so far during the past year and a half, and to Process anticipate what is in store for FY 1999-2000. The Capital Improvement Program update Background process begins with citizen involvement through the Citizen Involvement Teams. An The long-term Capital Improvement Program overview of the (AP process is presented to (CIP), initially adopted by the City Council the CIT's early in the calendar year so that on August 23, 1994, identified projects for the entire process can be completed and the the 1994-95 CIP Program and proposed a list annual CIP budget submitted to and approved of projects for the next 6-year period. The by City Council prior to the beginning of the Capital Improvement Program includes next fiscal year (July 1). The CIP overview to improvements to the streets, storm drainage, the CIT's is scheduled for the March 4, 1999 sanitary sewer, water and parks systems. The CIT meeting at the Tigard Senior Center. The street, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer citizens are provided the opportunity to CIP's are managed by the Engineering provide input into the process and to Department. The Water CIP is managed by nominate projects for evaluation and possible the Public Works Department, and the Parks inclusion into the program. This opportunity CIP is managed jointly by the Planning and will be provided in the April CIT meeting. Engineering Departments. For example, in previous years, there has been strong interest in pedestrian walkway The Capital Improvement Program is updated projects and on installation of traffic calming each year, and is reviewed and approved by devices, primarily speed humps. The Speed the City Council as part of the yearly budget Hump Program and specific pedestrian process. While the program lists projects for Capital Improvement Program Overview Page I of 9 APPENDIX H lillilillillimil~l walkway improvements resulted directly the respective systems. System development from CIT participation in the process. charges collected for the parks must be used for the acquisition, development, and After input from the CIT's, other citizens and expansion of additional recreation spaces and staff, the Capital Improvement Program is facilities. prepared and submitted to the Planning Commission for review and comment. The Policy Issues Planning Commission typically provides another opportunity for public comment on In the past, it has generally been City policy the proposed plan. After review by the not to use City funds for projects outside the Planning Commission, the plan with city limits. Some of the key streets that lie subsequent modifications, if any, is partially outside City limits include Gaarde submitted, with Commission Street, Walnut Street, and 121st Avenue. recommendation, to the City Council for These streets are major collectors and will review and approval. Council may make need to be addressed in the next few years, additional modifications to the plan during its regardless of jurisdiction. review and approval process. The approved plan would be the approved Capital Since the City has now assumed certain Improvement Program for the next fiscal responsibilities within the Urban Service year. Boundary through agreement with Washington County, joint projects to improve Funding major collectors are now being programmed for improvements in the coming few years. Funding Sources: The sources of revenue The 1997-98 CIP included design funding for for funding the Capital Improvement the realignment and signalization of the Program are the following: the gas tax, the existing dogleg configuration at the Walnut Traffic Impact Fee, Storm Drain Fund, Street/Tiedeman Avenue intersection. This Sanitary Sewer Fund, the park levy, park design project is nearing completion and is system development charges, the water fund, expected to begin construction during the and miscellaneous other funding sources. summer months in 1999. Washington County has initiated the design work for signalization Funding Restrictions: The gas tax can be and improvement of the 121 Avenue/Walnut used for upgrading the collector and local Street intersection and approaches. This streets within Tigard, without restriction. project would be Phase I of three phases to However, the revenue from the gas tax is improve Walnut Street from 1215` Avenue to i limited and is not sufficient to fund all the 135`h Avenue using MSTIP 3 funds. The a street improvement needs of the City. The Engineering Department is in the initial Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) can be used only for stages of the design for the extension of a highway and transit capital improvements Gaarde Street to Walnut Street and for the which provide additional capacity to major reconstruction and expansion of Gaarde transportation systems. The unrestricted Street from 121St Avenue to Highway 99W. funds for storm drainage and sanitary sewers Other projects to improve Tigard's major can be used for any project. However, collectors within the City limits and the systems development charges for water, Urban Growth Boundary will be considered sanitary and storm sewers must be expended in the next few years. on projects that provide additional capacity to Capital Improvement Program Overview Page 2 of 9 APPENDIX H MEW Program Areas overview presenied during the February CIT meeting. The streets that are to receive the Pavement Major Maintenance Program speed humps this year will be selected during (PMMP): This is a program of corrective and the next month or two for implementation in preventative maintenance on all the paved the spring and summer of 1999. streets in Tigard. It addresses those streets. that can still benefit from corrective or Storm Drainage Major Maintenance preventative action. Those streets that cannot Program (SDMMP): This program be rejuvenated through this program are addresses minor drainage-problems requiring eligible for reconstruction. There is currently more than normal maintenance effort. The a backlog of $1,500,000 in corrective funding for this program is typically overlays, repairs, and slurry seals. The typical established at $40,000 each fiscal year. The funding for this program is $250,000 to SDMMP is expected to be a continuing $300,000 per year. program in future years. The Speed Dump Program: This program is Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance a sub-element of the Comprehensive Traffic Program (SSMMP): This program is Calming Program which is currently being typically established at $40,000 per fiscal developed. The Comprehensive Traffic year to contract out sewer repair projects that Calming Program will analyze streets as part are beyond the repair capabilities of the of a network to determine what traffic Public Works Department. This program will calming measures may be appropriate to resolve existing sanitary sewer problems by reduce motor vehicle speeds without contracting out the repairs to fully equipped adversely impacting other streets in the licensed contractors and is expected to be a network. During the development of the continuing program in future years. Comprehensive Traffic Calming Program, the existing Speed Hump Program will continue Major Street Capital Improvement to provide funding for installation of speed Program: This program reconstructs and humps on streets that have clearly expands streets within Tigard. It addresses demonstrated the need for installation of those streets that have substantially these traffic calming devices. The streets are deteriorated, are beyond normal corrective selected using strictly applied ranking criteria maintenance, and are in urgent need of based on traffic studies to determine motor reconstruction. It also provides additional vehicle speed and volumes on each of these capacity on those streets that are in need of streets. The funding level for this program is widening to accommodate increase in traffic. $45,000 for 100% City funded installation, Projects are normally funded either through and $15,000 to be applied on a cost-sharing the gas tax or through Traffic Impact Fees. i basis with residents paying for 50% of the Among the streets that have been funded i cost. Because of limited contractor interest under this program are Main Street, and extremely high bid submittals, in-house Commercial Street, 130th Avenue and Public Works street crews are now installing Winterlake Bridge. + these speed humps at significantly lower a costs. To allow the Public Works crews more Bridge Replacement Program (HBRR): flexibility in scheduling installation of speed This is a federally funded program which humps during the spring and summer, this replaces badly deteriorated bridges program has been accelerated with the throughout the country. Each bridge Capital Improvement Program Overview Page 3 of 9 APPENDIX H undergoes a detailed inspection and is issued not currently served by the City. The City a rating, which determines eligibility for the funds each project for installation of new program. Replacement of the qualifying sewer lines to connect to the existing system, bridges requires 10% funding participation then establishes a reimbursement district to from the City, and 10% from the State. The recoup the costs from the residents as they Fanno Creek Bridges (at Grant and Tiedeman connect. The cost per resident for the Avenues) have been replaced under this installation would obtained by dividing the program. Tigard's bridges have been recently total construction and administrative costs by inspected. There are currently no candidates the number of residents that can connect. for inclusion in the program during FY 1999- Each resident would also be charged a 2000. connection fee and their fair share of the cost at the time of connection. The program is Surface Water Management (SWM) entirely voluntary, and residents do not have Funding (Water Quality/Quantity) to connect to the new sewer line unless they Program: Projects under this funding must choose to. A cap of $8,000 has been be included in the Unified Sewerage established by City Council for those Agency's master plan. Since these funds are residents who connect within a year after the collected as System Development Charges, sewer extension has been completed. they must be used to provide additional capacity to the drainage Systems within the Parks Program: The Parks system City. The City's 10% participation in the development charges are used to fund the Grant and Tiedeman bridges is funded from acquisition, development, and expansion of this program. additional recreational spaces and facilities. The current priority for the City is to acquire Storm Drainage Capital Improvement park land for future development. That has Program: This program provides funding been the primary focus during the past few from the unrestricted (user charges) storm fiscal years. drainage funds for improvements to Tigard's drainage system. This program repairs the Water System Improvement Program: The existing system, or otherwise provides funds water system development portion of the to improve those portions of the system that charges received when new meters are sold are not eligible for SWM funding. and installed must be used only for capacity related projects. The revenues from the Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement charges for use of water provide funds for the Program: This program is similar to the operations of the Water Department and for storm drainage program in that the Sanitary any improvements or repairs to the system Sewer Fund consists of System Development that may be required. Charges and unrestricted funds. The + unrestricted funds are used for system Program Highlights improvements or repairs while the restricted funds must be used for capacity related The following are the highlights of the improvements. Capital Improvement Program Projects accomplished in calendar year 1998 and in Neighborhood Sewer ]Extension Program: Fiscal Year 1998-99 to date. This program takes a proactive approach to extending sewer service into areas that are Capital Improvement Program Overview Page 4 of 9 APPENDIX H Street Projects August and completed most of the work 1998 Pavement Major Maintenance by mid-December. The remaining work Program (PMMP): The PMMP is an will be completed in January. annual program of corrective and preventive maintenance on all paved Slurry Seals: A slurry seal is a streets in the City. There was a backlog of preventative treatment to rejuvenate $1,500,000 at the beginning of FY 1997- streets with minor cracks that do not 98 in corrective overlay, repairs, and require removal and replacement of the slurry seals. Each year, additional streets existing asphaltic concrete pavement. The with an estimated $200,000 in pavement following streets were selected to receive upgrade requirements, are added to the this preventative treatment: Alderbrook backlog as the overall street network ages Drive, Summerfield Drive, Bond Street, and deteriorates. Approximately $300,000 Churchill Way, 80th Avenue, Genesis was expended in pavement upgrade Loon, Pathfinder Way, Terrace Trails, projects during FY 1997-98. 118` Avenue, 92"d Avenue, Heidi Court, Approximately $500,000 was allocated in Leslie Court, and Dawn Court. FY 1998-99 for the PMMP. Because of Approximately 17,000 lineal feet (3.2 the relatively large amount of funding miles) of slurry seal was applied on these available this fiscal year, the PMMP was streets. California Pavement Maintenance divided into two phases of approximately Company, Inc. began work in August and $250,000 each. Phase 1 was completed in completed most of the work by mid- calendar year 1998. Phase 2 will be December. The remaining work has since constructed during the late spring and been completed. early summer 1999. This division of projects into two phases should ensure The Speed Hump Program: This good bids and construction activity in the program installs speed humps in minor months prior to July 1999. The PMMP for collector and residential streets to reduce 1999-2000 will further continue the traffic speeds. Due to high prices pavement upgrade work through the entire submitted by contractors, this year's summer. program was performed by the Public Works Department. Installation of speed The projects included under Phase 1 were humps on 115`h Avenue, Ventura Court, basically categorized under pavement 90`h Avenue, Baylor Street, North Dakota overlay and slurry seals. The following Street and 103rd Avenue were completed are the projects completed under Phase I during the summer months of 1998. The in calendar year 1998: residents of 103`d Avenue were the first City residents to take advantage of the Pavement Overlay: There was 50% cost-sharing option made available approximately 4,050 feet (0.8 mile) of each year in the CIP. pavement overlay placed on the following streets: Scott Court, Center Street, Bell Bonita Road Improvements: This Court, 82nd Avenue, Nimbus Avenue, project is split into three phases, the first Hampton Street, Highland Drive, and two of which have been completed: Tiedeman Avenue. Benge Construction Company, Inc. began construction in Phase 1- Utilities relocation: Construction Capital Improvement Program Overview Page 5 of 9 APPENDIX K began in January 1998 and was completed service performed by David Evans and in March 1998 by Marshall Associated Associates. Construction work began in Contractors, Inc. The scope of this phase September. The Contractor experienced included relocation of the existing unforeseen weather conditions and was electrical conduits from above ground to unable to meet the CDBG deadline of underground. An 18-inch steel pipe casing December 3151. The project deadline was was required in the area where conduits extended to February 14, 1999, and the have to cross the railroad and was contractor was able to complete the installed by boring under the railroad project within the extended deadline. tracks. 79`h Avenue Improvements: This street Phase II - Railroad Crossing and Flashing is classified as a minor collector road per Light Signal Installations: Phase II was the Comprehensive Plan Transportation designed and constructed by Willamette & Map. The project will improve the Pacific (W&P) Railroad. The scope of this existing sanitary sewer and drainage phase included replacement of the systems and widen 79th Avenue from rubberized railroad track crossing with Durham Road to Bonita Road. Century concrete material and installation of a new West Engineering Corp. has been selected crossing signal system. Construction of to finish the design. A neighborhood this phase began in August and was meeting will be conducted in January to completed in October. obtain public input into the design process and to gain public support for the project. Phase III - Street Widening: Phase III Construction funding has not yet been includes widening of the street to full identified for the project; however, this width, and requires right of way project would be a candidate for funding acquisition and temporary construction under a future road bond issue. easements to accommodate that expansion. This is an in-house design Greenburg Road/217 Overcrossing project and is scheduled to advertise for Widening: This project is a joint effort bids in mid-February 1999. All necessary between Washington County and the City, right-of-way, construction easement and and was constructed to improve traffic railroad permits have been obtained. circulation on Greenburg Road in the Construction is anticipated by mid-April Washington Square Mall area. The project 1999 with project completion expected by is primarily funded via MSTIP 2 funds the end of August. with an additional $400,000 in federal funding. The City's share of the federally + 915` Avenue Widening: The widening of funded portion is 10.275%. The project 91" Avenue between Greenburg Road and widened Greenburg Road over Highway Lincoln Street is a Community 217 and added a northbound and Development Block Grant (CDBG) southbound lane in this area. ODOT project. The scope of work is widening of provided the project design and the existing street to local street standards. construction management. Construction Construction of curb, sidewalk, water and began in February and was completed by storm drainage is also included in the the end of November. improvement. This is an in-house design project with right-of-way acquisition Capital Improvement Program Overview Page 6 of 9 APPENDIX H Walnut Street and Tiedeman Avenue problems. The Pinebrook Street project Intersection Realignment: Walnut Street was awarded to HPS Construction, Inc. has been proposed for realignment to and the View Terrace project was correct a dogleg configuration with awarded to Gelco Construction, Inc. The Tiedeman Avenue and Fonner Street. The design was completed in-house in 1997. project is now being designed by Murray, Construction began in January and the Smith and Associates and will be ready projects were completed in March 1998. for construction by July 1999. Other Projects 69th Avenue Improvements: This is a Local Improvement District (LID) project Neighborhood Sewer Extension initiated by Specht Development, Inc. Program: This program extends sanitary Based on a favorable preliminary sewer service into residential evaluation report presented to Council in neighborhoods. The City initiates and October, Council directed the preparation completes the sewer extensions, then of a preliminary Engineering report which recoups the total cost of the design and was submitted to Council in February construction via creation of a 1999. DeHaas and Associates, Inc. was reimbursement district. As residents selected to perform the preliminary connect to the new sewer line, they have design. If the district is successfully to pay their proportionate share of the cost formed and the project proceeds according of the line, plus the normal connection to the established schedule, the street fee. At least 50% the property owners that improvements would be completed by can connect to the new line must approve November 1999. the project for the new sewer system to be extended into a neighborhood. Council Drainage Projects approved a resolution reducing each resident's share of the cost to $8,000 for 110th and Park Street Storm Drainage: those that connect within a year after This project was originally intended to completion of the project. widen Park Street to provide a pedestrian path from Watkins Street to 110th This year's program included two homes Avenue. Citizens in the neighborhood did on Hillview Street. The contractor, Miller not want the pedestrian path installed, but and Sons, began the work in October and requested that the City alleviate an completed the project in November. existing drainage problem on Park Street instead. The Engineering staff prepared Another project that is still under design the design plans in-house and bid out the includes nine houses on 106th Avenue and project for construction. Wystan Brown Johnson Street and requires a creek Excavation, Inc. began construction in crossing. Construction will begin in July May and completed the project in 1999 to meet the construction window October. within the creek required by the State. Pinebrook Street and View Terrace: Tigard Street Parking Lot: The site is These two relatively small projects were located on Tigard Street, near the intended to upgrade the existing drainage intersection of Tigard Street and Main systems and alleviate periodic flooding Street. To provide additional parking for Capital Improvement Program Overview Page 7 of 9 APPENDIX H NEW. downtown shoppers, the project includes • Tigard Vertical Net: Establishment of five construction of 14 regular spaces and 1 additional Bench marks with elevations disabled space with landscaping and and monumentation. lighting installed throughout the parking. MH Construction, Inc. began the work in Traffic Studies October and substantially completed the Over 100 traffic studies were conducted on streets project by the end of December. in Tigard and in the Washington County urban HighTor Reservoir: A paved pathway services agreement area. The.studies were needed to be installed for maintenance conducted for many different reasons. Studies access and to direct storm water from the were performed to determine the needs and reservoir site to the street. Construction priority of streets where speed humps have been began in June and was completed in July. requested, and to determine their effectiveness after speed humps were installed. Studies were Fanno Creek Trails: Projects in the done to evaluate the need for new or existing proposed Fanno Creek trail system traffic control devices (signs and pavement include seven greenway trail segments markings). Regularly scheduled traffic studies with the first segment beginning at North were done to maintain current data in areas under Dakota Street and the last segment ending development. When speeding problems were at Main Street. Two trail segments were identified, information was provided to the police constructed during calendar year 1998. department to assist in enforcement. Many Segment 1 (North Dakota Street / Tigard citizens, developers, realtors, and consulting Street trail) and Segment 6A (Ash engineers ask for this data on a regular basis. Avenue/Fanno Creek trail). Construction Most of these 72-hour studies began on Tuesdays of the other segments are delayed until and ended on Fridays, using Hi-Star magnetic calendar year 1999 to allow time for imaging equipment. Data gathered includes obtaining wetland permits and acquisition volumes, truck percentages, and speeds. The of permanent easement. information obtained from the studies provide the Survey projects: Topographic survey basis for decisions on future street improvements, work for in-house design projects was and for design and implementation of traffic performed throughout the calendar year. calming devices to reduce high vehicle speeds on Other survey projects included the minor collectors and residential streets. following: Proposed Priority Areas For FY • Encroachment survey for the area 1999-2000 northwest of Cook Park. • The preventative and corrective actions • Albertson's lot line adjustment for necessary to preserve and extend the life of Park acquisition. the various streets in Tigard will continue to be a high priority each fiscal year. • Parking lot staking for the Balloon festival. • Street reconstruction will again be considered for those streets that are beyond normal • 107th Avenue right of way research. maintenance. Capital Improvement Program Overview Page 8 of 9 APPENDIX H • The realignment and signalization of the • The Parks Program will continue with Walnut Street/Tiedeman Avenue acquisition of properties for future park intersection will be a construction priority development. In addition, the construction during FY 1999-2000. In addition, design of several bike/pedestrian paths is of Gaarde Street to provide a connection scheduled for summer of 1999. Design to Walnut Street and to widen and work and compliance with permit reconstruct the two-lane section from requirements are currently underway and 121st Avenue to Highway 99W will be a are nearing completion. major project during calendar year 1999. • Water projects for maintenance and • The preparatory work to enable placement expansion of the system will again be of a road bond issue on the ballot in the continued in the next fiscal year. year 2000 will be a major priority in calendar year 1999. The establishment of What's Next? a task force to oversee the process and selection of projects for that road bond The opportunity for citizens of Tigard to issue will be the initial steps in this effort. nominate projects for consideration in the FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program • Traffic calming efforts will continue to be will be provided in this meeting and in the a high priority for the next fiscal year. The April CIT meeting. For those that cannot development of a Comprehensive Traffic attend the April meeting, the City will accept Calming Program will be a major priority written comments or suggestions at any time this calendar year. in the process prior to approval by City Council. The final project listing will be a • The City Council has indicated a strong combination of City staff input and citizen interest in providing street lighting in unlit recommendations. The proposed program will areas of the City where street lights are be presented to the Planning Commission in required to enhance pedestrian safety or to early June and to City Council during the deter crime. The establishment of a June 22, 1999 Business Meeting. The program to provide such lighting will be a approved plan will be ready for priority in the coming fiscal year. implementation July 1, 1999. • Minor repairs to the storm drainage and . _ sanitary sewer systems will again be For, more:infbfmdti©n,:please call,orwrite to performed through the Storm Drainage th e following: Major Maintenance and Sanitary Sewer Yannie T. Nguyen, P.E. Repair Programs. Engineering Manager • The Neighborhood Sewer Extension E-mail: vannie@ci.tigard.or.us (503)' 639-4171 Ext. 375 Program will be continued for those residents that indicate a strong interest in Agustin P. Duenas, P.E. connecting to the City's sanitary sewer City Engineer system. We have several extensions that (503) 639-4171 Ext. 378 are currently under consideration for E-mail: gus@ci.tigard.or.us installation during the summer months of 1999. Mailing Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Capital Improvement Program Overview Tigard, Oregon 97223 Page 9 of 9 APPENDIX H FY 1999 -'2000 Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PMMP) Slurry Seal 70th Ave 69th To Taylor's Ferry Road 94th Ave Lakeside To End 106th Ave North Dakota To Black Diamond 108th Ave North Dakota To End 108th Ave Black Diamond Way To Cul De Sac 108th Ct Black Diamond Way To Cul De Sac 115th North Dakota To Springwood 121st Scholls To Springwood Alderbrook Ct Summerfield To End Alderbrook PI Summerfield To End Black Diamond 106th To 70' West Of Ponderosa Place Johnson Grant To 99w Karol Ct Katherine To Cul De Sac Lakeside Drive Alderfrook To 98th Marie Ct. 128th To Cul De Sac North Dakota Scholls To Springwood North Dakota Greenburg To 400' East Of Greenburg Pathfinder Ct Walnut To Cul De Sac Ponderosa P1 Black Diamond Way To Cul De Sac Summerfield Ct 92nd To End Tigard Drive Summercrest To 115th Walnut City Limits To Grant • Asphaltic Concrete Overlay 107` Park street to Cook Lane Bonitia Road 72"a to the City's Limits Scoffins Street Main street to Ash Ave McKenzie Street 99W south to end Meadow Street Tiedeman to end APPENDIX I MEMORANDUM TO: Gus Duenas, City Engineer FROM: Wayne Lowry, Director of Finance RE: CIP funding projections DATE: March 29, 1999 We have prepared the estimates for CIP for each fund for 1999/00. These estimates are preliminary and are based on the budget as requested by Departments. The requested budget has not yet been reviewed by the City Manager. We therefore expect the numbers to change. Sanitary Sewer 3,000,000 Storm Sewer 900,000 Water Fund 2,000,000 State Gas Tax 545,000 Traffic Impact Fee 3,800,000 TIF Urban Services 900,000 Parks SDC 910,000 Underground Utility 373,000 Water Quality/Quantity 882,000 Water SDC 946,000 Metro Greenspace 247,000 Tree Replacement 227,000 Water CIP (Supply) 4,000,000 Park Levy CIP 218,000 Let me know if you need any further information or if you have any questions. APPENDIX J y ..ii..,.B~'..y!w.i....~~.a,..Lawi.-__...o.u..,.~•:u.1.,r'...-~..a._,_..~w~.,w.~...~..r....w......r.v_.,v...v.J..... LL.._...a-... .~..i......._..,. ~L~ _ ,w_... •1 I ~ l ~ (b f d ~ -ly ~ M , ~ hr K , g f ,11t, '1 I, 3 :fit r-c I 412 a a ~ 3 aw- ~ a. a `III ~ wr 1 a 9t ttI t%t,1I ~ tl Il, t, ti•,~ a.~ •ty s II 4itr9i t. ~,.j 1,3i;tt ;i ;f 1 q r.~t~ n 1 yt1 OGi ~ ~3➢ ~ ~ ;t!~t9,1~; I dill tH i>jt I , . ~ ~ a ~r 19~;t" l~lltitl A~Ij Y i 4 : s ~ f8 E~ . t is ,;;II~. ~i';;.I~~j;1~41i t ~ 4 q r f $ R srv Q ~ G! 1 ; 4 f!'s• 4 1;4 L I x® a ° o oll d A °;tr w r L ~ 7 -7 - ~ - _ ~ .f: I t S _.v .~xu_ u~r_...,~.-•.......... - J...~.~'J;_....~,ui~~~.+`'~~u....-.i...v~.i~.---) - r ~ F ~ ~A k c i _ 1' F ItyW~Fm yuvl. OUDTyBLAIiE PABR AIAOT=p= BBALIONTI2AILATN.DAKOTA < 1 { ee, ' FOWLEHOCRIWOODABDPILTR®IL s F~ ParkR*ots I r Yk e. „ a WOODABD PARR/61RANTAVE TRAYL SOTTO%DARBIERS a z GRANTAVENUEMMINBTTRAIL , d I ~ f y. d MAIN 6T/ABH AVE TRAM o TIYIABD OT OAR OCI TRAIL 1 I , } dwN / ~ ~ r ®UOOIBABD t*t A,RT~ p a ~ r FI~V OTBIICTIT~ 'i 7 e I-A s ; 9H00DABD FAI e IMPROVEMENTS q r ; e I FANNO PARK TRAIL LIGHTING d [ d w» did p ~ .m ~j Q~OL{FA.BIt 0 ` / E {PANSION COOKPARK . EXPANSION 10 «tSdd4.xMd..Akt~~lyrA g,; 11I71 )ffi MMlN pq ~ IN41.iwtill 1 f ~ MprtloaMyelN~ - ~ 6 - 1MM~ ~..{1f Ii City offigard ' - - it _ 1 r' ~ a II a r ~ b Q 3~ F !i W4v.K ` r. gy , F b ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ g Jam/ I r. a - v a a '"tee„ a ' + ? e ~'q It, f ry l~ 1 II $ ~ , F r ~ Js WW ~ h p~ ff 1 I m 4 S4 ~ q ~ I ~ - .ter f ~ s ` 63 s fl. I y~ ;3 ;s I I` 3~ t ( i! f r i i f 4 C i •G 5 i SFr s 2 is a t re)' ® ;a 8i x ~ ( E a. low I I' -am 0-1 'x'00 ~J ' E ` < a~8r a F d '17 C h ~ ! _ N p ~ m t am ~ o H9 yr > a ~ ~ " i zt 9 e.. ~ ~ 4 L 5 ~ ~ 1 y h ~g -1 le NYq YM 1 a ~ ~ ~ m 3 r 151 ~ rI ~ c is 9 I i ~ t , j ! r C rap I-T yf . ji 1k:'. f f x xah c :irk ~ E$~ ~ f F Lam.. a a Ila ~I 40 99 cm 16 ~1 wz ~ h] FI 1 alp rt•, i.: r I II =ri ae. es 'ytl I Iii Ir I I. itV 11~ q. Vi °~~I - T, f A iYl q~ Ffl +j 1f41II 1 n I ~ YI y7 I tli ~ Vtly~+' i0q>:~.<` °"e:<• ~ I s tlt~il ~ t II} I a Fa 'B g{ t ~ cQ ~ i:. "i g i w p b i V1EA] 4 14 s s k =i 7 :`a 7C 1 , C y. ~ ~ r :c5 - pr .7 p ~ :I 4 f p SUMMERL&KE PACK MAGTHRPLAN ' l REALIGN TRAILATN. DAKOTA r } FOWLER 19CEVWOODARD PH TRAIL < F ° w ou I ~ DOTR'Y31DYdA i3YE WOODAKDPAIt&b/Q~ID~AVETRAIL k ow.meugsp s ~ 1 , ~ QriY,tAA3'i'A~IIIEi~4IP119'TTIdAYL ~ • - s~ w ~ t r TYtdAKD ST,JFOC+GXEE. OCR TRAIL MAIN ST/ASH AVE TRAM I F L~ B 3 I WOODARD PARK PLAY STBU WOODARD PAS d IMPROVEMENTS , Y i a ; PANNOCEEEKPARK ® . TRAM LIGHTING S j yy I i d ✓ ~ pp E"ANSION COOKPARK EXPANSION ~ ;q - ~ ~ - ~ P ~ - bt.misstlwmPe 6rgvd6a.wuk F I t wM . ~ ed.td/kwld.iYivq«f£q+d qpy Ii+I.Y+m FnwiMiiw i I:htW Vd Nh~ I ~ 'i 9 0. '19.61~9f^J Ole City of Tigard t 4 ~ h k ' o ' 0. ~ "aw ~ s- 3 M6 r a a i ~ m r" q,. h s ter. i i L __j ei~~ 6d s G N = E >j a;y j 1 r e '1 7 71 - .t r.t_ ...JJ.y_-.:W......,...»u'.is ...E _.~.....~,...w...c...,w_ v~-y..~..., - - - ~ i f~ r Sry ~O EF c b a~4{H. - ~ l NORPH DAY0T4 a ..rn x v i IATHAVOT0 e ;t w` J 4 - - r T7696RiANAiB E WaterProj>Neta S j x k QUAM HOLLOW W89T LINCOLN NP. p2ZS*UHSHSDUC GOTATIOfN ENDUII07`0016TA , r~ AUTUMN HIL ¢ p p ' t7 PEE69UHH DEDUCING STATRO 7] gg r~ r, ~ 9 fi A 8 . I~I ll _ HurHta~ ~ ~ / C ;j 043LL1AOmITAtrN eaTO HA8!ffie aIDGE 1 ! i o` kY~ 91, tai r' DE@.lMMM,13D i. ..::I 13=TTOKMOAMBUH ~..`,..I i y^.wqe, h fa.urw i.YnM•c. P.nJMww W, { ~ W.'MM4xwfd.nl4[n(Tywd _ Ipf!ym't ~OMn• _ j7pS~ _ E i copy R, ~ ~ ~ f ~ N Y 4 ~ f ` 77-1 i City of Tigard Agenda Item No.~. Meeting of ~o 0-1 Qg CITY OF TIGARD Engineering Department Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-624-0752 TO: City Council Bill Monahan, City Manager FROM: Gus Duenas City Engineer DATE: June 18, 1999 SUBJECT: Revisions to the Proposed FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Attached are revisions (project descriptions and Appendix B) to the proposed FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program submitted by memorandum dated June 8, 1999. Updated estimates on the Fanno Creek path projects, modifications to the IGA with Metro for greenspaces (local share) funding, and the addition of two other projects required these revisions to the Parks System Program. The following are the specific changes: • Reallocated the greenspace acquisition funding (Project No. 10) to supplement the various trail projects and deleted the lump sum greenspace item. • Added the Summerlake Park Master Plan Update to the project list. • Deleted the Cache Creek Park Master Plan (non-eligible project) and substituted Fanno Creek Restoration project. • Allocated funding for land acquisition on the Woodard Park/Grant Avenue Trail (Project No. 7), but rescheduled the actual construction to FY 2001-02 (see Project No. 29). This project requires extensive boardwalk construction and a bridge. Funding for construction based on the updated estimate cannot be included in the FY 1999-2000 project listing. I request that these revisions to the Parks System Program in the CIP be reviewed and approved during the FY 1999-2000 CIP budget action scheduled for the Council meeting of June 22, 1999. c: Cyndi Turner Jim Hendryx PARIS SYSTEM PROGRAM (Revised June 18, 1999) Project Descriptions The list of first year, or FY 1999-2000, projects include "Committed" and "New" projects. "Committed" projects are projects that were funded last year, but were not anticipated to be completed as of July 1, 1999. The funding shown for these projects are the amounts needed to complete the project. "New" projects are projects that will be funded for the first time. Attached as Exhibit B is the Parks component of the City's seven-year CIP plan. ® Committed Projects 1 & 12. Cook Park Expansion: Construct bio-swale, east restrooms, parking lot, and install utilities. 2. Woodard Park Play Structure: Replace older play structure with new structure designed for younger children. 3. Woodard Park Improvements: Install new restroom or other improvements as called for in master plan. 4. Fanno Creek Park Lighting: Install overhead lighting along pedestrian trails. 5. Tigard St./Fowler School Trial: Construct 1,800-foot segment of Fanno Creek trail with bridge over Fanno Creek. 6. Fowler School/Woodard Park Trail: Install 1,526 foot segment of Fanno Creek trail 7. Woodard Park/Grant Avenue Trail: Acquire land for the construction of a 1,100-foot trail segment, including bridge over Fanno Creek. Construction is listed as Project No. 29. 8. Grant Avenue/Main Street Trail: Obtain right-of-way and install 650 feet of new trail connecting to existing trail at Morland Plumbing. Replace existing path located under Pacific Highway. 9. Main Street/Ash Street Trail: Install boardwalk, bridge, and paved path between Main and existing Fanno Creek trail segment. 10. Bottom Barriers - Summer Lake: Provide bottom barriers for weed suppression in Summer Lake at those areas that cannot be reached by the aquatic harvester. 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Pagel of 3 EMMA !1!11:111111_0 Mal M111~111 lii-li~ollilli o New Projects 11. Summerlake Park Master Plan Update: Update park master plan, with public involvement. 13. ADA Transition Plan: Develop system-wide plan to meet federal American with Disability Act access standards. 14. Fenced Dog Park: Locate suitable site for fenced dog park and address on-going maintenance requirements through dog owner friends group. 15, 20, 27, 30, & 34. Upgrade Playgrounds: Replacement and retrofit all play structures as needed to improve safety. 16. Fanno Creek Restoration: Restore 1.6 acres of natural area along Fanno Creek. 17. Realign trail at N. Dakota Street: Realign Fanno Creek trail at N. Dakota St. to connect opposite southerly segment. 18 Cook Park/85th Avenue Trail: Extend multi-use trail from the end of 85th Ave. to connect with the Cook Park trail system. 19. Cook Park Field Drainage: Upgrade existing sportsfields at Cook Park. 21. Trail Alignments Study: Determine the feasibility of and map alignments of proposed trail extensions: Ash Creek/Fanno, Summer Creek/Fanno, Genesis/Pathfinder, Durham Road/Tualatin River, and Powerline from Barrows to Tual. River. 22. Walnut/Woodard Park Trail: Construct segment connecting Pathfinder/Genesis to main stem Fanno Creek Trail. 23. "Albertson" Park Improvements: Construct priority improvement(s) identified in park master plan now under preparation. 24. Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge: Construct bridge over Tualatin River using grant funds, if awarded. 25. Bonita Road Park: Construct neighborhood park financed by grant funds, if awarded. 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 2 of 3 MIMENEMIM 26. "Canterbury" Park: In cooperation with water district, develop neighborhood park on Little Bull Mt. Reservoir site. 28. Cook Park/RR trail: Extend Tualatin River trail from Cook Park to railroad tracks. 29. Woodard Park/Grant Avenue Trail: Install boardwalk, bridge and paved path between Woodard Park and Grant Avenue. 31. Construct rollerblade/skateboard facility: Identify site and construct skate park. 32. Renovate Woodard Park: Develop Woodard Park in accordance with master plan. 33. Hall/Bonita trail Construct Hall/Bonita Fanno Creek trail segment. 35. Bonita Road/Durham trail: Obtain right-of-way and complete segment of Fanno Creek trail. 36. Develop nature park: Implement master plan for Cache Creek Park. 37. Acquire land for Jack Park Expansion: Acquire 3.4-acre property located between existing park and Walnut Street. 38. Pathfinder/Genesis Trail Extension: Extend trail from Fairhaven to Gaarde Street. 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Program Page 3 of 3 PARKS SYSTEM PROGRAM PROJECT PARKS SDC GREENSPACES OTHER/GRANT Committed Projects 1 Cook Park expansion $165,000 2 Woodard Park play structure $60,000 3 Woodard Park Improvements $50,000 4 Fanno Creek Park trail lighting $60,000 5 Tigard St./Fowler Sch trail $155,000 6 Fowler Sch/Woodard Pk trail $58,000 $28,000 7 Woodard Pk/Grant Ave trail $12,000 8 Grant Avenue/Main St trail $85,000 $12,000 9 Main St/Ash Ave trail $200,000 10 Summer Lake Bottom Barriers $20,000 Total Committed Projects $698,000 $207,000 FY 1999-2000 Committed Projects $698,000 $207,000 11 Summerlake Park Master Plan Update $22,000 12 Cook Park Expansion $400,000 $15,000 13 ADA Transition Plan $30,000 14 Fenced dog park $20,000 15 Upgrade playgrounds $50,000 16 Fanno Creek Restoration $50,000 17 Realign trail at N. Dakota $10,000 Totals for FY 1999-2000 $1,230,000 $257,000 FY 2000-01 18 Cook Pk/85th Ave trail const $100,000 19 Cook Park field drainage $250,000 20 Upgrade playgrounds $80,000 21 Trail alignments study $30,000 22 Walnut/Woodard Pk trail $35,000 23 "Albertson's" Park improvements $50,000 1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Revised June 18, 1999 APPENDIX B Page B-1 TIM! PARKS SYSTEM PROGRAM 24 Tual Riv Ped Bridge $1,000,000 25 Bonita Road Park $320,000 Totals for FY 2000-01 $545,000 $1,320,000 FY 2001-02 26 "Canterbury" neighborhood park $65,000 27 Upgrade playgrounds $80,000 28 Cook Park/RR trail $80,000 29 Woodard Park/Grant Ave. Trail $275,000 Totals for FY 2001-02 $500,000 FY 2002-03 30 Upgrade playgrounds $180,000 31 Provide rollerbld/skateboard facility $150,000 32 Renovate Woodard Park $250,000 $30,000 Totals for FY 2002-03 $580,000 $30,000 FY 2003-04 33 Hall/Bonita trail $416,000 34 Upgrade playgrounds $80,000 Totals for FY 2003-04 $496,000 FY 2004-05 35 Bonita Rd/Durham trail $415,000 36 Develop nature park $100,000 Totals for FY 2004-05 $515,000 FY 2005-06 37 Acquire land for Jack Park Exp. $450,000 38 Pathfinder/Genesis trail $100,000 Totals for FY 2005-06 $550,000 1999-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Revised June 18, 1999 APPENDIX B Page 13-2 AGENDA ITEM o FOR AGENDA OF June 22, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Formation of Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement District No 13 PREPARED BY: G.N. Berry DEPT HEAD OK aT'Q"'CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Formation of a sewer reimbursement district to construct a sanitary sewer project as part of the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of the attached resolution forming the reimbursement district. INFORMATION SUMMARY Eight property owners at SW Inez Street and SW 100' Avenue and west along SW Inez Street have requested to be provided with sewer service through the Neighborhood Sewer Extension Program. Under this program, the City would install public sewers to each lot and the owners would reimburse the City for a fair share of the cost of the public sewer at the time of connection to the sewer. If this resolution is approved, bids will be requested from contractors to construct the sewer. The construction contract will require approval by the Local Contract Review Board. The Engineer's Report attached to the proposed resolution provides additional details. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Direct that the resolution be revised. 2. Reject the reimbursement district. FISCAL NOTES Funding is by unrestricted sanitary sewer funds. IAdtywide\sum\relm 13s.doc oil Agenda Item No.-a- Meeting of t0' of 'ol C CITY OF TIGARD Community Odw&pment Shaping.g Better Community P WINE% UOLI'm REMIN"ROOT1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, AT A MEETING ON TUESDAY. June 22.1999 AT Z= PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER RE MBU SEMENT OISTRICT NO. 13 The Tigard City Council will conduct an informational public hearing to hear testimony on the proposed Reimbursement District formed to install a sewer Eight property owners at SW Inez Street and SW 100ei Avenue and west along SW Inez. Both public oral Ind written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted as required by Section 13.09.060 of the Tigard Municipal Code. Further information and the scheduled time for this item during the Council Meeting may be obtained from the Engineering Department at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639-4171. I 6 -'/0- 9 oil i it I sement District No• 13 ewer lgeimbnr ,two proposed 3 Owners une 16,1999 Tax Lot Number 25111 BD X01 Address 100 Avenue 2S111BA &i at 14530 SW 100th Avenue 2g111BC 400 OW°er d Shine ' 14470 S 2S111BC 500 d ~ pvenue 11BC 600 NO DonalK°dler 14485 SW lOQZ Street 2S1 Hem o yes taUnhall 10055 SW ez Street 2g111BC 700 YeS Jose and Bette M 10085 S w1 eZ Street 2S111-BC $00 ynS Ian .ttePar on 10135 hiezStreet IVO Bn et aallMeBude 10175 SW yes and Carla Renick AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF _6 / 2 2 / 9 9 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Council Review of Fanno Creek Trail Improvements (CPA 99-00001/SLR 99- 00003/Title 3 CU) A/ PREPARED BY: D. & M. Roberts DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK L_ ~ ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the Council approve the Fanno Creek Trail proposal, as recommended by Planning Commission? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposal, subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in the attached staff report. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City, as applicant, requests approval of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay from small portions of three wetlands to allow construction of segments of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Greenway trail between SW Tigard Street and the SW Ash Avenue extension. As part of the same application, the City requests Sensitive Lands approval for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain and Title 3: Water Quality, Flood Management, and Fish and Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone. In addition to its location within the sensitive lands 100-year floodplain, the proposed trail alignment will unavoidably disturb portions of three wetlands listed as "Significant" on the City Wetland Inventory. The combined disturbance area is approximately 0.30 acre. The City development code prohibits landform alteration within wetlands. In order to develop within wetlands, a comprehensive plan amendment is required. Whenever a local comprehensive plan amendment is proposed, applicable sections of the Metro Functional Plan must be addressed. In the case of the present application, the applicable functional plan section is Title 3, which protects streams, wetlands, and floodplains. At its June 7, 1999, meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and voted unanimously to recommend the City Council approve the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay, Sensitive Lands Review for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain, and Title 3 Conditional Use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone, based on the findings and conclusions included in the staff report. A copy of the staff report, labeled Exhibit "A", is attached. The approval conditions are the normal requirements for work within sensitive lands and setback areas as set forth in the applicable City, USA, and Metro regulations. As a side note, the most important permit required for trail construction to proceed is the Corps of Engineers fill permit. A separate application for this permit was submitted last year. Agency action, dependent on this application, is pending as of this writing. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED No alternatives to Council approval have been considered. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A FISCAL NOTES Approximately $460,000 has been budgeted for the completion of the trail sections. i:\ci"delsum\fannocreektrails.sum i 1 i f 11111 01. EXHIBIT A :l TOKE FBI. 0Ft D, O~ON C ~eweFee h 1 t 120 DAYS = NIA SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment CPA 1999-00001 Sensitive Lands Review SLR 1999-00003 PROPOSAL: The City, as applicant, requests consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay from small portions of three wetlands to allow construction of segments of the multi- modal Fanno Creek Greenway trail between SW Tigard Street and the SW Ash Avenue Extension. The combined area included within the wetland fills in question is approximately 0.30 acres. As part of this same application, the City requests Sensitive Lands approval for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain and Title 3: Water Quality, Flood Management, and Fish and Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: City of Tigard Attn: Duane Roberts, Project Planner 13125 SW Hall Boulevard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential, Industrial, Central Business District. ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5, IP and CBD. LOCATION: Fanno Creek Greenway between Tigard Street and Ash Avenue Extension. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3 Model Ordinance. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff proposes that the Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL to the City Council CPA 1999-000011SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 1 OF 13 for the above request subject to certain Conditions of Approval. The proposed findings and conclusions on which the recommendation is based are noted in Section IV. TMFOLLOVYINC CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 1. Submit a copy of the permit approval from the Division of State Lands and US Army Corps of Engineers. 2. Install erosion control measures prior to construction. Erosion control measures may not be removed until construction has been completed. 3. Any fill placed within the floodplain shall be offset by an equal amount of excavation elsewhere within the floodplain portion of the project area. 4. Upon completion of construction, the Water Quality Resource Area shall be restored and maintained in accordance with the mitigation plan and specifications contained in Table 2 of the Title 3 Model Ordinance. 5. To the extent practicable, during construction existing vegetation shall be protected and left in place. Work area shall be carefully located and marked to reduce potential damage to the Title 3 Water Quality Resource Area. Trees in the Water Quality Resource Area shall not be used as anchors for stabilizing construction equipment. 6. Where existing vegetation is removed during construction, or the original land contours disturbed, the site shall be revegetated, and the vegetation shall be established as soon as practicable. Nuisance plants, as identified in the Metro Native Plant List, may be removed at any time. Interim erosion control measures such as mulching shall be used to avoid erosion on bare areas. Nuisance plants shall be replaced with non-nuisance plants by the next growing season. 7. Prior to construction, the Water Quality Resource Area shall be flagged, fenced or otherwise marked and shall remain undisturbed, except as may be required to complete the proposed trail improvements. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The Comprehensive Plan includes a bicycle/pedestrian trail element that calls for a bikeway along Fanno Creek. The Comprehensive Plan and 1987 Tigard Park Plan identify the Fanno Creek bikepath as a continuous, off-street path that follows the route of Fanno Creek as it flows between the northern and southern city limits. Between the 1980's and mid-1990's, new development in the area of the Fanno Creek Greenway was conditioned to provide the bikepath as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Within the boundaries of the present project, bikepaths have been constructed along the streamside edge of the Morlan Plumbing property and under the Pacific Highway bridge connecting to Main Street. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 2 OF 13 In order to add more specificity to the Comprehensive Plan designation, in 1997 the City conducted a technical study, with extensive public participation, to map the alignment of the trail from Tiedeman to Durham Road. In designating the most appropriate route, the study considered wetlands, soils, vegetation, wildlife, and topography within the greenviay corridor as well as various social factors, such as neighborhood and employment locations. Vicinitylnformation and Proposal Description: The land uses along the two sides of the trail corridor consist of a school sports field, industrial development, commercial development, and older single-family residential development on 7,500 square foot lots. The boundary of the Greenway Corridor is coterminous with the floodplain. Over the years, significant encroachment and fill has occurred within the greenway Corridor, which is located within an older part of the City. With the exception of parts of three segments, the proposed trail segments consist of a 10-foot-wide paved pathway with two feet of shoulder on either side. This width is consistent with regional and state standards for the Fanno Creek Trail and is designed to provide for the safe passage of two bicycles approaching in opposite directions. The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (Fowler School Site) Wetland Impact Area: 11,250 square feet (SF) (750 linear feet); 52 cubic yards (CY) excavation; 427 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park (Woodard Park Site) Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue Wetland Impact Area: 1,995 SF (133 linear feet); 0.17 CY excavation; 117 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street Segment 6b: Main Street South Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Total Wetland Impact Area: 13,245 SF (0.30 acre) or 833 linear feet of trail; 52.17 CY removal and 544 CY fill Three bridges are part of the project, and will span Fanno Creek (twice) and Summer Creek from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND PROPOSED FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: CHAPTER 18.775, SENSITIVE LANDS Section 18.775.020.0 states that landform alterations or developments which are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 3 OF 13 the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, Unified Sewerage Agency, and/or other federal, state, or regional agencies do not require a sensitive lands permit. The City shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies are obtained. All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the 100-year floodplain, slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground, drainageways, and wetlands that are not under state or federal jurisdiction. The proposal will impact wetlands that are under state and federal jurisdiction and, therefore, do not require sensitive lands review. Permit requirements of state agencies are addressed elsewhere within this report. The Water Resources overlay is applicable to the wetlands impacted by this project and is addressed elsewhere in this report. Floodplain impacts are addressed below. Section 18.775.020.E.2 states that sensitive lands permits shall be required in the 100- year floodplain when any of the following circumstances apply: o Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in all floodway areas; o Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in floodway fringe locations involving more than 50 cubic yards of material; e Repair, reconstruction, or improvement of an existing structure or utility, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction provided no development occurs in the floodway; e Structures intended for human habitation; and o Accessory structures which are greater than 528 square feet in size, outside of floodway areas. The proposal includes ground disturbance involving more than 50 cubic yards of material in the floodway fringe. Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 183.120 defines "floodway fringe" as the area of the floodplain outside the floodway area. Therefore, sensitive lands review is required for this project. Section 18.775.070.6 provides that an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: e Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; The project engineer has determined that the proposed project will preserve the floodplain storage capacity of the portion of Fanno Creek within the project area, that the zero-foot rise floodway will not be disturbed, and that the project will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 4 OF 13 -121111111 ME-Mmuffiffim 111111l • Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the Comprehensive Plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards; The land within the project area is zoned R-4.5, IP, and CBD. Landform alternation is permitted in areas designated as commercial or industrial. The proposed use is community recreation and, as such, is an exception to the prohibition on landform alteration within residentially designated zones. ® Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood The applicant has proposed to offset the proposed floodplain fill with an equal amount of excavation within the 100-year floodplain, so that the proposed alteration will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year floodplain. • The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely; The proposed alteration is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway project that carries out the City pathway plan and the policies and objectives of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. • The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood; The applicant proposes to locate the pathway above the elevation of an average annual flood. • The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained; and The approval of the Division of State Lands has been obtained. A copy of the project permit has been provided to the City. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval is pending. • Where landform alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The proposal under consideration carries out the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PACE 5 OF 13 PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Planning Commission recommends City Council find that the proposal satisfies the approval criteria for landform alterations within the 100-year floodplain. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (18.797.080) This Chapter has standards for sites identified as significant on the Tigard Wetlands and Stream Corridors Map. The standards identify Fanno Creek as a Major Stream, which requires a 50-foot setback from top-of-bank or the upland edge of associated wetlands. Table 18.797.2 identifies water related recreation facilities and trails as a "Type I allowed use with mitigation" within the riparian setback area. Powever, any landform alteration within wetlands in the Water Resource overlay is prohibited. Section 18.797.140 states that in order to develop within wetlands, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is required. This section addresses the applicable criteria for construction of the trail in the riparian setback area and for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Section 18.797.060.A states that, for Type I uses, the applicant shall prepare a plan that demonstrates that the use will be constructed and located so as to minimize grading, native vegetation removal, and the area necessary for the use. The Director may require additional information where necessary to determine WR district boundaries or to mitigate identified impacts from a proposed development, including but not limited to: o Site survey as prescribed in Section 18.797.06013; The applicant has submitted a site survey completed by certified land surveyors. • One or more of the reports described in Section 18.797.060D. The applicant has submitted a topographic survey as conducted by David Evans and Associates along with a technical study prepared by Fishman and Associates addressing the vegetation removal and grading associated with the proposed and alternative trail alignments. The proposed alignment minimizes natural vegetation removal and grading to the maximum extent consistent with trail safety. The applicant also has provided a wetland delineation study covering the project area, as well as a wetland mitigation plan. Alternative sites are limited due to the intended location of the trail adjacent to Fanno Creek and the location of the existing trail system. Segment 2, Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue, has unavoidable wetlands within the project area. Beginning at Tigard Street, the trail is routed outside the wetland boundary and crosses the unavoidable portion of the wetland near its narrowest section. The trail then skirts the edge of the wetland and the edge of the playing field and associated equipment (fitness course signs, workout equipment stations, and ballfleld backstop) and impacts only a narrow fringe of mowed and disturbed wetland. All Oregon Ash trees on the north side of Fanno and Summer Creeks are avoided, and only emergent wetland is impacted. The bridge crosses Summer Creek where no adjacent wetlands are present, and then joins with Tiedeman Avenue to connect with Segment 3. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 6 OF 13 11 Jill --mommom Segment 3. Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands in the park, as well as an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) mitigation area north of the park. Segment 4. Woodard Park to Grant Avenue: The trail skirts above the wetland boundary where possible, impacting a narrow fringe of emergent wetland on the north side of Fanno Creek. The trail runs in an upland area on the south side of Fanno Creek and then crosses a narrow neck of unavoidable emergent wetland, avoiding forested wetland areas. Trail alignment is constrained through this segment due to steep upland slopes on the north side of Fanno Creek; the trail has to cross a backwater emergent area on the south side of Fanno Creek to connect with the paved ramp up to Grant Avenue. Impacts to the backwater wetland area are avoided by constructing a boardwalk bridge across the wetland area, with piers in the upland (top-of-bank to top-of-bank). Segment 5. Grant Avenue to Main Street avoids wetlands. The trail alignment has been routed outside of the wetland area; it connects with an existing concrete walk located north of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Main Street. Segment 6b Main Street South: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands, and a large section of the proposed trail on the east side of Fanno Creek was abandoned due to the extensive amount of wetlands present. A part of the trail in this section is a boardwalk, to raise the trail up and avoid excessive fill (in uplands) near the top-of-bank of Fanno Creek. In this segment, the location of the bridge crossing Fanno Creek was constrained by the City's easements on the adjoining properties (and by construction of a new building south of Main Street on the east side of Fanno Creek). The trail continues in upland on the west side of Fanno Creek to connect with the existing paved pathway. A southern portion of this trail segment connects to the Ash Street right-of-way, avoiding wetlands on both sides of the trail. The wetlands along the trail alignment have been delineated and described in two wetland delineation reports prepared by Fishman Environmental Services (FES) in the spring of 1998. The two impact areas are described below: The northernmost impact area is in Segment 2, on the Fowler School site owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The trail skirts a broad flood plain of Fanno Creek dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail, and crosses a narrow neck of the wetland that extends away from the floodplain area (this wetland neck extends upslope to the west, off-site to a wetland seep area). The trail then impacts a narrow grassy fringe of emergent wetland east of the school ball field and west of an Oregon Ash wetland forest that is immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek. Part of this wetland area is regularly mowed as lawn associated with the ball field. Soils in the floodplain area were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam, with no redox concentrations to 6 inches, over a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) stiff clay, with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations to a depth of 16 inches. Soils in an upslope position near the crossing of the wetland neck were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silty clay loam to 16 inches, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations, and gray (10YR 5/1) depletions at 14 inches. The floodplain receives high-water over-bank flows from Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 7 OF 13 The other segment with wetland impacts is Segment 4, north of Grant Avenue. The trails passes through an emergent meadow associated with the floodplain of Fanno Creek. Bentgrass and Reed dominate the meadow area Canarygrass, and has soils that were a very dark grayish brown and dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 and 4/2) sandy silt loam, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1) depletions in the surface 10 inches. The soils had a compacted hardpan at 10 inches, possibly disturbed from previous sewer line construction. The second wetland crossing in this segment occurs on the opposite (south) side of Fanno Creek, where the trail crosses a narrow finger of sparsely-vegetated, disturbed wetland dominated by Climbing Niightshads and Red-Osier Dogwood, with Himalayan Blackberry on the slopes. The trail avoids the surrounding Oregon Ash and Red Alder trees near the trail. Water quality in this backwater area appears to have been negatively impacted by trash and debris. Section 18.797.140 requires the following criteria to be addressed to allow the proposed fill and mitigation of wetlands designated on the City's Significant Water Resources map: The analysis shall consider the Environmental, Social, Economic and Energy (ESEE) consequences of allowing the proposed conflicting use fully, consider both the impacts on the specific resource site in comparison with other comparable sites within the Tigard Planning Area; The ESEE analysis must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Tigard City Council that the adverse economic consequences of not allowing the conflicting use are sufficient to justify the loss, or partial loss of the resource; In particular, ESEE analysis must demonstrate why the use cannot be located on buildable land, consistent with the provisions of this chapter, and that there are no other sites within the Tigard Planning area that can meet the specific needs of the proposed use; The Comprehensive Plan calls for a trail through the Fanno Greenway, which is defined as the area cc-terminus. with the 100-year floodplain. Because of existing development along and with,n the floodplain and also because two-thirds of the floodplain area is wetlands, very limited locations are available at this time for the retrofitting of the trail within the corridor. A trail located on buildable land outside of the corridor would not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and, because of creekside development, would have to be designed as an on-street trail. Such a trail would serve a transportation function but would not serve the purposes of a recreational trail as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's ESEE analysis demonstrates that the benefits of allowing the trail far outweigh the limited negative consequences associated with its environmental impact. The ESEE analysis shall be prepared by a team consisting of a wvildiiife biologist or wetlands ecologist and a land use planner or land use attorney, all of whom are qualified in their respective fields and experienced in the preparation of Goal 5 ESEE analysis; CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 8 OF 13 In addition to City of Tigard Planning and Engineering Staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to the ESEE analysis include David Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area based on the Water Quality Resource Area Requirements table included in the Metro Model Ordinance. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek. If the application is approved, then the ESEE analysis shall be incorporated by reference into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and the Tigard Wetland and Stream Corridor Map shall be amended to remove the site from the inventory. PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above and the applicant's ESEE analysis incorporated herein by reference, the Planning Commission recommends City Council adopt a finding that the adverse economic, social and energy consequences of not a!lowing portions of the Fanno Creek trail are sufficient to justify partial loss of the wetland resource. TITLE 3: WATER QUALITY, FLOOD MANAGEMENT AND FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION, MODEL ORDINANCE CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.F 1 n 1998, Metro Council adopted performance standards for the protection of streams, wetlands, and floodplains, called Title 3 of the Functional Plan. Tigard and the other jurisdictions within Metro are required to amend their Comprehensive Plans and develop codes to address these new standards by January 1, 2000. In addition to Title 3, Metro has adopted a model ordinance that provides approved examples of provisions that can be used by jurisdictions to comply with Title 3 performance standards. Although the City has not as yet adopted Title 3 compliance measures, the Metro attorney has determined that local Comprehensive Plan amendments related to water quality and flood management must comply with Title 3 as it stands during the period before adoption and acceptance of such measures. Since only the model ordinance, and not Title 3, contains standards for pathways, these are followed in this application in order to address the present proposal's consistency with Title 3. The applicable portion of the Model Ordinance is Section 1.5 "Walkways and bike paths". This section states as follows: b. A paved walkway or bike path shall not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the Protected Water Feature. For any paved walkway or bike path, the width of the Water Quality Resource Area must be increased by a distance equal to the width of the path. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation. Where practicable, a maximum of 10 percent of the trail may be within 30 feet of the Protected Water Feature; and C. A walkway or bike path shall not exceed 10 feet in width. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999.00443 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 9 OF 13 The trail alignment was developed based in part on the avoidance of significance natural resources and maintenance of the 10% standard specified in the model ordinance. However, due to development along the creek and the extent of wetlands within the floodplain, aligning the trail to meet the 10% standard prove) impracticable. According to the applicant's submittal, as presently designed, 29% of the trail including paved and boardwalk portions, is within 30 feet of water resource boundaries. The reasons for this amount of encroachment and the consideration given to alternative alignments that could reduce this impact are detailed in the ESEE analysis section of this report. To recapitulate briefly, Segment 2 is constrained by the sports field location. Segment 4 is constrained by the need to cross the creek bend and the configuration of the wetland within the greenway area. Segment 5, Grant Street to Main Street, is constrained by existing buildings (the Woodard Apartments) and the existing berm, which is located very near an oxbow of Fanno Creek, and also by the need to connect to the existing trail, which is close to the creek. Segment 613, Main Street South, is constrained by an existing building on the Dolan property. In each case, no alternative alignments are present. Although the alignment exceeds the 10% standard, the trail poses very limited disturbance to the existing vegetation and has avoided all forested and most scrub-shrub areas, with the exception of the two Oregon Ash trees that need to be removed for the bridge over Fanno Creek in Segment 4. In order to compensate for the removal of riparian vegetation, however limited, and to enhance the vegetation along the creek, the applicant has provided a specific planting plan for two highly disturbed sites of 0.83 and 0.78 acres. The proposed planting plans satisfy the Title 3 baseline standard of 80% groundcover and 50% tree canopy using non-nuisance planting from the Native Plant List. This proposed upland re-vegetation work is in addition to the mitigation required by wetland fill permit conditions. As a result of these two projects, the net effect of the trail project will be to improve the overall biological conditions of the riparian area along Fanno Creek. In addition to City of Tigard Engineering Staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to this project included David Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek (attached). Topographic, tree survey, wetland, and debris and noxious materials information is depicted in the base maps accompanying this report. The implementation schedule, including timeline for construction, mitigation, mitigation maintenance, monitoring, reporting and contingency plans are included in the reports. These timelines are subject to right-of-way negotiations and the timing of the necessary permits and approvals. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 10 OF 13 911111 111111 111111 PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Planning Commission recommends City Council find that the applicant's plan satisfies the standards of the Metro Title 3 model ordinance relating to Walkways and Bike Paths. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department and Water Department have had an opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. The Operations Utility Department has had an opportunity to review the proposal and has offered the following comments. Because the proposed trail will parallel an existing sewer trunk line, the trail could provide access for sewer line maintenance and emergency repairs. It also could provide improved access for much needed stream bank stabilization projects. As such, the trail surface should be constructed to support the weight of utility vehicles SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and The Unified Sewerage Agency have had an opportunity to review this proposal and offered no comments or objections. The Oregon Division of State Lands has had an opportunity to review the proposal an offered no comments or objections. The Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development has had an opportunity to review the proposal an offered no comments or objections. The US Army Corps of Engineers has had an opportunity to review the proposal and offered no comments objections. Metro was given an opportunity to comment on the proposal and provided the following comments: Once again, thanks for taking us on the field trip. We all enjoyed being able to see the alignment first hand and to see that two critical needs, providing trail opportunities and protecting natural resources, are being met. Metro is totally supportive of Tigard's efforts to design and build the portion of the Fanno Creek trail that lies in the City. It is a key segment of the entire trail system from the Willamette Park at John's Landing to the Tualatin River. Overall, the City is proposing a reasonable plan to comply with the Title 3 requirements. As discussed on Friday, below are our comments: When the trail abuts a wetland or is in the vegetated corridor of a stream, where possible or practicable, reduce the area of impact through means such as: CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 11 OF 13 o Narrowing shoulders (from 2ft to 1ft) with native vegetation and/or grasses • No mowing of the shoulder adjacent to the wetland e Narrowing impervious trail surfaces (from 1Oft to 8ft) • Pervious trail surfaces where possible (Gresham is using compacted gravel - call Phil Kidby, Gresham Parks at 612-2530 and Metro is planning to use compacted gravel on the Springwater Corridor Trail - call Dawn Uchiyama, Portland Parks at 823-5596 for more information) o Boardwalks as an alternative along wetlands and at pinch points There are numerous opportunities for restoration of the riparian corridor including removal of non-native, invasive plants and replacing them with native plants. A 3-year plan for monitoring the success of the restoration projects is recommended. Title 3 requires that any fill added to the floodplain be matched with an equal amount of fill removal to maintain the capacity of the floodplain. Staff Responses: Regarding the necking down of the trail and shoulder, our understanding was that this comment applied to two areas: the wetland area along the edge of the sports field and the portion of the trail alignment located on top of flood control berm. We understood that Metro had no objection to a ten-foot wide trail in the upland areas. In order to avoid user conflicts, we would prefer to build to the state and regional ten-foot standard. City staff is agreeable no mowing of the shoulder adjacent to the sports field wetland. Since the trail route and shoulder is within the existing lawn area, we will need to coordinate with the school district regarding a change to their current practice of mowing the entire sloped area. Pervious surface Where possible is a suggestion we have investigated. Other than experimental surfaces and expensive inter-locking pavers, crushed rock appears to be the only feasible alternative surface available. City staff do not view this as an appropriate surface for the Panno Creek Trail. This is because the trail is intended to be multi- modal, serving pedestrian, bicyclist, wheel chair users, and skaters. Compacted gravel is not suitable for narrow wheeled bikes and roller and in-line skates and is problematic from a maintenance point of view. Therefore, we would prefer to go with an asphalt surface. We plan to use boardwalks at the two locations we pointed out in the field. The plan has been revised to include compensatory excavation, as required under Title 3. The excavation will include removal of the overgrown hard surface basketball court and the grubbing out of the blackberries in the area between the flood control berm and creek bank on the Johnson Street Apt property. The cleared area will be restored with natural vegetation as described in the project proposal. Engineering is doing the quantity calculations at this time. CPA 1999.00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 12 OF 13 -Mill To go back, when we visited the apartment property, we incorrectly identified the trail as running on top of the portion of the berm near the bend in the creek. Instead, the trail is proposed to run over and along the apartment side of the berm and within in the lawn area. It then runs up and back over the berm. For handicapped and ramp safety reasons, we would prefer to not narrow down this section of the trail to eight feet. Our engineers believe this width is too narrow relative to the gradient of the trail and would pose a potential safety hazard to trail users Robert Bothman of the Panno Creek Trail Working Group has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: I have reviewed the amendment and the plans for segments 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6B. I have visited the segments and support the amendment and plans for these sections. SECTION VII. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS Dewey and Margaret Hamilton have reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: We are retired and walking and riding bicycles along these trails is important to us in maintaining a healthy life style. Being able to walk and ride on a trail with a natural setting rather than a roadway is an important safety feature for us. Ken Tolliver has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: want you to know that at least one family is 100% behind the needed amendments that your are considering. Actress to the trail will increase the exposure of local residents to the natural areas along the creek and help them to be more connected with it. Please approve the amendment requests. Mike Meredith has reviewed the proposal and provided comments in support of approving the applicant's proposal. June 9. 1999 PREPARED BY: Mark J. Roberts DATE Associate Planner June 9. 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager i:\Irpln\duane\fannocreektrail.doc CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARO FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 13 OF 13 it I Ge OGaAIMIc Ie Foe Ye.TIOe a TaTEw d VICINITY MAP ig rTi t I T I i tcwrt~ I I CPA 1999-00001 i-H CITY OF TIGARD ` r FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT I ~ 16 Sub'ect properties i are included in the I ~ 5~ `rs i trail alignment project Sti ~ Il or 9~`F N I 5 f`\ Streams MAJOR 4 , r MINOR i Tigard Wetland Inv. N r ~ 4 sr "U7I I 0 100 800 1200 Feel IP~ 1 1'• 858 feet Qty /rte ~ ~'~i i ` i City of Tigard ' Information on this map is for general location only end should be venfied with the Development Services Division, j till---___--Jll 13125 SW Hall Blvd i I -J I I I Tigard, OR 97223 1 f l I I I j i i i~ i (503) 639-4171 I httpJrwvtw. ci ti srd.w.us Community Development Plot rlatP• Mav 19 1000 r. lmani~tnncnlrm eoa 01 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM z Fanno Creek Trail Corridor r 1 Proposed Trails iit 1 c ~ ~ E f i • poi, Existing Trails as 2 - f mEkDow t. N f. A 0 407 800 Feet r City of Tigard i W ;,!e shmidh w6edwththeDe tserAmDv-jl 13125 SN Hall Blvd r 639-4171 FItp/Mwwd.tKprdor.vs Ctimrrunity Development piS date: Jun 15,1999; C:1rrlagic\Magic03.apr CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 99- AN ORDINANCE APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 99-00001), SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR 99-00003), AND TITLE 3 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW, REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the City's Water Resources Overlay, Sensitive Lands Review, and Title 3 Conditional Use Review to construct sections of the Fanno Creek Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 1999, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the aforementioned land use applications, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval included in the attached Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 1999, the City Council held a public hearing and approved the aforementioned land use applications, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval included in the attached Exhibit «A „ NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all of the relevant criteria as noted in the attached Planning Commission recommendation to the Tigard City Council, also referred to as "Exhibit A." SECTION 2: The City Council approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Sensitive Lands Review, and Title 3 Conditional Use Review, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval as set forth in the attached "Exhibit A." SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 1999. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of '1999. James Nicoli, Mayor is\citywidebrd\Fannotrail.ord.dot ORDINANCE No. 99- Page 1 of 1 Project Proposal PANNO CREED( TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Proposal Summary The City, as applicant, requests consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay from small portions of three wetlands to allow construction of segments of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Greenway trail between SW Tigard Street and the SW Ash Avenue Extension. The combined area included within the wetland fills in question is approximately 0.30 acre. As part of this same application, the City requests Sensitive Lands approval for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain and Title 3: Water Quality, Flood Management, and Fish and Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone. Introduction The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The comprehensive plan includes a bicycle/pedestrian trail element that calls for a bikeway along Fanno Creek. The Comprehensive Plan and 1987 Tigard Park Plan identify the Fanno Creek bikepath as a continuous, off-street path that follows the route of Fanno Creek as it flows between the northern and southern city limits. Between the 1980's and mid-1990's, new development in the area of the Fanno Creek Greenway was conditioned to provide the bikepath as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. In order to add more specificity to the comprehensive plan designation, in 1997 the city conducted a technical study, with extensive public participation, to map the alignment of the trail from Tiedeman to Durham Road. In designating the most appropriate route, the study considered wetlands, soils, vegetation, wildlife, and topography within the greenway corridor as well as various social factors, such as neighborhood and employment locations. The Fanno Creek trail is part of the Regional Trail System and 40-Mile Loop first identified in the early 1900's. Metro is the government responsible for regional planning and in the 1990s designated the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail as a priority project and promoted a bond measure for acquisition of property and trail construction. To date, regional bond measure funds have been used to purchase two properties, respectively covering seven and eleven acres, within the Tigard portion of the corridor. The present, city-sponsored project includes the construction of five trail sections all located between Tigard Street and Ash Avenue. Along with existing trail sections, these projects will complete approximately two miles of trail inter- s connecting at Scholl's Ferry with 1.6 miles of trail in Beaverton. A total of $460,000 has been allocated for right-of-way acquisition and construction of the pathways. The projects are programmed for construction in 1999. The properties within the Greenway areas proposed for the pathway improvements are zoned R-4.5, IP, and CBD. The topography generally consists of typical floodplain, with the creek bordered by steep banks and broad floodplain. Approximately two-thirds of the Greenway floodplain within the project area is wetlands. The main benefits of the projects include providing opportunities for healthy, outdoor recreation activities, such as walking, jogging and bicycling; increasing pedestrian and bicycle access through the community; and providing access to the natural environment as a refuge from the stresses of urban life. A 1998 citywide park and open space needs assessment indicates that walking is the most popular recreation activity in the City and that the demand for additional recreational trails is high. Proposal Description The proposed five trail segments consist of a 10-foot wide paved pathway with two feet of shoulder on either side. This width is consistent with regional and state standards for the Fanno Creek Trail and is designed to provide for the safe passage of two bicycles approaching in opposite directions. The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (Fowler School Site) Wetland Impact Area: 11,250 SF (750 linear feet); 52 CY excavation; 427 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park (Woodard Park Site) Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue Wetland Impact Area: 1,995 SF (133 linear feet); 0.17 CY excavation; 117 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street Segment 6b: Main Street South Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Total Wetland Impact Area: 13,245 SF (0.30 acre) or 833 linear feet of trail; 52.17 CY removal and 544 CY fill Three bridges are part of the project, and will span Fanno Creek (twice) and Summer Creek from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. Project Impacts and Alternatives Alternative sites are limited due to the intended location of the trail adjacent to Fanno Creek, the location of the existing trail system, and the City's ownership and easement procurement. 2 all; Segment 2, Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue, has unavoidable wetlands within the project area. Beginning at Tigard Street, the trail is routed outside the wetland boundary and crosses the unavoidable portion of the wetland near It's narrowest section. The trail then skirts the edge of the wetland and the edge of the playing field and associated equipment (fitness course signs, workout equipment stations, and ballfield backstop) and impacts only a narrow fringe of mowed and disturbed wetland. All Oregon ash trees on the north side of Fanno and Summer Creeks are avoided, and only emergent wetland is impacted. The bridge crosses Summer Creek where no adjacent wetlands are present, and then joins with Tiedeman Avenue to connect with Segment 3. Segment 3, Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands in the park as well as an ODOT mitigation area north of the park. Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant Avenue: The trail skirts above the wetland boundary where possible, impacting a narrow fringe of emergent wetland on the north side of Fanno Creek. The trail runs in an upland area on the south side of Fanno Creek and then crosses a narrow neck of unavoidable emergent wetland, avoiding forested wetland areas. Trail alignment is constrained through this segment due to steep upland slopes on the north side of Fanno Creek; the trail has to cross a backwater emergent area on the south side of Fanno Creek to connect with the paved ramp up to Grant Avenue. Impacts to the backwater wetland area are avoided by constructing a boardwalk bridge across the wetland area, with piers in the upland (top-of-bank to top-of-bank). Segment 5, Grant Avenue to Main Street avoids wetlands. The trail alignment has been routed outside of the wetland area; it connects with an existing concrete walk located north of Pacific Highway and north of Main Street. Segment 6b, Main Street South: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands, and a large section of the proposed trail on the east side of Fanno Creek was scrapped due to the extensive amount of wetlands present. A part of the trail in this section is a boardwalk, to raise the trail up and avoid excessive fill (in uplands) near the top-of-bank of Fanno Creek. In this segment, the location of the bridge crossing Fanno Creek was constrained by the City's easements on the adjoining properties (and by construction of a new building south of Main Street on the east side of Fanno Creek). The trail continues in upland on the west side of Fanno Creek to connect with the existing paved pathway. A southern portion of this trail segment connects to the Ash Street right-of-way, avoiding wetlands on both sides of the trail. In order to minimize construction impacts to the waterway and wetlands, best management erosion control practices (silt fences and biofilter bags, as outlined 3 in the Unified Sewerage Agency Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans, Technical Guidance Handbook) will be specified in the construction documents prepared by the City of Tigard. Physical and Biological Description of Impacted Wetland Areas The wetlands along the trail alignment have been delineated and described in two wetland delineation reports prepared by Fishman Environmental Services (FES) in the spring of 1998. The two impact areas are described below: The northernmost impact area is in Segment 2, on the Fowler School site owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The trail skirts a broad flood plain of Fanno Creek dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail, and crosses a narrow neck of the wetland that extends away from the floodplain area (this wetland neck extends upslope to the west, offsite to a wetland seep area). The trail then impacts a narrow grassy fringe of emergent wetland east of the school ball field and west of an Oregon ash wetland forest that is immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek. Part of this wetland area is regularly mowed as lawn associated with the ball field. Soils in the floodplain area were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam, with no redox concentrations to 6 inches, over a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) stiff clay, with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations to a depth of 16 inches. Soils in an upslope position near the crossing of the wetland neck were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silty clay loam to 16 inches, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations, and gray (10YR 5/1) depletions at 14 inches. The floodplain receives high-water over-bank flows from Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. The other segment with wetland impacts is Segment 4, north of Grant Avenue. The trails passes through an emergent meadow associated with the floodplain of Fanno Creek. The meadow area is dominated by bentgrass and reed canarygrass, and has soils that were a very dark grayish brown and dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 and 4/2) sandy silt loam, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 411) depletions in the surface 10 inches. The soils had a compacted hardpan at 10 inches, possibly disturbed from previous sewer line construction. The second wetland crossing in this segment occurs on the opposite (south) side of Fanno Creek, where the trail crosses a narrow finger of sparsely-vegetated, disturbed wetland dominated by climbing nightshade and red-osier dogwood, with Himalayan blackberry on the slopes. The trail avoids the surrounding Oregon ash and red alder trees near the trail. Water quality in this backwater area appears to have been negatively impacted by trash and debris. 4 Wetland Mitigation In order to compensate for the unavoidable disturbance of wetlands and meet state and federal mitigation requirements, the City has developed a conceptual mitigation plan. The proposed plan calls for the mitigation of the 0.30 acre wetland impact by enhancing 0.90 acre of non-forested, reed canary grass and meadow foxtail- dominated wetland, located in the floodplain area east and south of an Oregon ash wetland forest adjacent to Fanno Creek, on the Fowler School site in Segment 2. This provides a 3:1 enhancement ratio and mitigates adjacent to the largest wetland impact incurred by the trail system. The existing wetland forest area is dominated by Oregon ash and reed canarygrass, with scattered clumps of Piper's willow, clustered wild rose, and Douglas' spirea. The wetland will be enhanced by planting large Oregon ash saplings and Piper's willow cuttings, to extend the forested wetland area into the meadow area, and appropriate shrubs (clustered wild rose, red-osier dogwood, and Pacific ninebark) will be planted adjacent to the existing forest near the trail to provide additional wildlife habitat. The trail will still remain open and not obscured by the plantings (for security reasons). A complete copy of the proposed mitigation plan is included with the printed material submitted as part of this application. Sensitive Lands Review Listed below are the approval criteria contained in the Sensitive Lands section of the Tigard Community Development Code along with the applicant's response to each: 1. Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered II professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. 5 The attached letter signed and stamped by a City of Tigard state-registered civil engineer certifies that the proposed project will preserve the floodplain storage capacity of the portion of Fanno Creek within the project area, that the zero-foot rise floodway will not be disturbed, and that the project will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. 2. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards. The land within the project area is zoned R-4.5, IP, and CBD. Landform alternation is permitted in areas designated as commercial or industrial. The proposed use is community recreation and, as such, is an exception to the prohibition on landform alteration within residentially designated zones. 3. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year floodplain. As indicated in the attached memo from Vannie Nguyen, P.E., the proposed alteration will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year floodplain. 4. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely. The proposed alteration is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway project that carries out the City pathway plan and the policies and objectives of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. i { 5. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. i The above-mentioned memo from city engineer Vannie Nguyen, P.E., verifies that the pathway will not be located above the elevation of an average annual flood. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained 6 The approval of the Division of State Lands has been obtained. A copy of the project permit is included with this submittal. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval is pending. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and ESEE Analysis The Water Resources Overlay provides for the consideration of a comprehensive plan amendment to remove the WR overlay designation from a property based on a specific development proposal. According to 18.85.140, the approval process requires the applicant to justify the appropriateness of the proposed removal based on the results of a State Goal 5 ESEE analysis. In response to this requirement, the applicant's analysis of the economic, social, environmental, and energy consequences of allowing the proposed pathway use is provided below. Economic Consequences Numerous studies illustrate that proximity to natural resources increases property values. Similarly, inclusion of greenways in new developments has been shown to increase the land value of surrounding properties and to accelerate lot sales. Other studies have shown that property values tend to decrease by distance from open space. However, no studies could be located that specifically address the effect on land values of the placement of an all-weather pathway through a greenway. In general, based on the popularity of pathways, it is possible to speculate that a well-developed greenway path system contributes to rather than detracts from the economic well being of a community. Social Consequences The social and other benefits of preserving wetlands are widely recognized in this community. Though its Sensitive Land and Water Resource Overlay code provisions, Tigard currently provides more protection for its wetlands and water resources than most other communities in the state. The social consequences of allowing the 0.30 acres of wetland fill may include the incremental diminution of: the scenic value associated with the complete preservation of the resource sites, the quality of life related to the protection of wetland wildlife habitat, the urban design and open space values associated with full preservation, and the educational value associated with complete protection. To the extent that the wetland fill decreases the scenic, wildlife habitat, open space, and educational values associated with the three wetland sites, then there are adverse social consequences associated with allowing the proposed vegetation removal and fill. 7 Ear- Most of the 0.30 acres of wetland impact occurs to the wetland located along the western edge of the Fowler School athletic fields. The area impacted is the fringe of mowed and disturbed wetlands. It is infeasible to avoid this impact by moving this path segment further away or to the other side of the creek. This is due to the existing sports field use on the one side and to the location of the t wetland within the backyard lawn areas of six residential lots on the other. The other areas impacted are the narrowest sections of two lineal wetlands, each of which crosses the route of the pathway and cannot be avoided by the re- routing the trail. The impact to the wetland within Segment 4 potentially could be avoided by moving the trail alignment to the upland on the other side of the creek. However, this is neither practicable nor less detrimental, because the area between the top of bank and the existing industrial uses on this side is narrow and steep and would require much of the path to be located to within a few feet of the top-of-bank. An additional obstacle to moving the path is that one of the two owners of land within the area under discussion has refused to consider allowing access for the trail. The social benefits of allowing the 0.30 acres of wetland fill relate to outdoor recreation and to the improved accessibility the trail would provide. The trail would provide a reasonably direct route through the center of the city for long or short trips. It also would provide a more direct and safer walking route for many of the children who walk to Fowler Middle School. Tiedeman Avenue is the main walking route of the middle school-aged children living north of the school. This street is designated as a major collector, but includes a sidewalk on only one side of half its length. Two-way traffic volumes are in the 7,000 ADT range. This creates a dangerous situation for school children and other pedestrians. The proposed greenway path segments connecting to the school will provide a much safer walking route than presently is available. Lastly, to the extent the trail project is consistent with the 40-mile loop regional trail plan, it also will meet regional social needs. Environmental Consequences In general, the typical environmental consequences of allowing a trail to disturb wetland sites are related to the incremental loss of wildlife habitat as well as degradation of other wetland functions and values. Placement of fill for a trail will eliminate wetland vegetation. Even without wetland fill, a trail will generate significant levels of human activity and will degrade wetland habitat values. Examples of these disturbing uses include wildlife harassment by unleashed dogs and off trail uses. Illegal trash dumping and littering also occurs along trails. Trash can pollute water, harm wildlife and provide a seed source for non- native intrusive plants. Restricting a trail would keep human activity to a minimum. 8 Although, to a greater or lesser extent, these typical human impacts would apply to the present project, the.physical design of the trail segments poses very limited disturbance to the existing vegetation. It avoids all forested and most scrub-shrub areas, with the exception of the two Oregon ash trees needed to be removed for the bridge over Fanno Creek in Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant Street. The majority of the wetland impacts occur to emergent (and in some areas mowed lawn grass) wetlands. The impact to riparian vegetation is very limited. With regard to maintenance of the existing hydrology where the alignment crosses wetlands, the trail as designed provides very little disturbance to existing hydrology for two reasons: 1) most impact areas are located near the outside edge of wetland, where little or no disruption to the wetland's hydrology occurs, and 2) the trail passes surface water hydrology adequately by surface sheet flow of water over the top of the trail, since the trail is set at grade. A boardwalk is proposed for two areas, the impact area east of the bridge included in Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant St., so that net fill can be avoided (this area was still calculated to be fill) and on the Dolan property just south of Main Street where the trail is constrained between the top-of-bank and an existing building. The acquisition of the wetland and upland area of the proposed trail location on the south side of the creek will allow removal of an undesirable use of the natural area, by no longer storing heavy equipment and vehicles in this area, and allow for clean-up of this disturbed urban wetland. An additional goal of the trail through this section is to connect with the existing ramp up to Grant Street. Re- routing the trail to the other side of the creek in order to avoid the wetland is not feasible because the path route would traverse a very steep slope immediately upslope of a wetland and Fanno Creek and would come very close to exiting industrial buildings. Moreover, the owner of one of the two parcels on this side of the creek is opposed to granting access for the trail. Segment 5, Grant Street to Main Street, is constrained by existing buildings (the Woodard Apartments) and topography (existing berm located very near an oxbow of Fanno Creek). Near Grant Street, the vegetation impact from the trail located within 30 feet of the creek is mainly to Himalayan blackberry. The alignment minimizes riparian impact by preserving existing trees. The trail is close to the creek at the oxbow, again due to constraints of the building and berm location, and from there connects to the existing trail which is located close to the creek. This area also is constrained, specifically by the George Morlan { warehouse. No alternative alignments are present. , Segment 6B, Main Street South, is very unfortunately constrained by an existing building on the Dolan property as well as the long political history of "Dolan vs. the City of Tigard". This segment is located within a fixed easement purchased from A-Boy and it is not possible to be re-routed. No easements are currently present on the other side of Fanno Creek, which in any case also contains an existing commercial building sited close to the creek (eighteen feet at the 9 narrowest point), and the owner is opposed to granting access to the Main Street portion of his property. Energy Consequences There appear to be no positive energy consequences of prohibiting the proposed wetland fill. . Rather, the energy consequences of allowing the fill are overwhelmingly positive. They include reduced oil consumption and reduced reliance on energy inefficient' automobiles. The project will complete a link in the city and regional bicycle circulation systems. It will encourage bicycle commuting and bicycle use for recreational purposes by providing connections to neighborhood destinations and commercial and industrial land uses. As future trail extensions and neighborhood connections are completed, the trial system will further help reduce air pollution and reliance on the automobile. Conclusion Based on the evaluation of the resource sites wetland functions and values, and based on the analysis of the environmental, social, economic, and energy consequences of allowing and restricting the conflicting use in question, the conclusion reached is that the City should allow the conflicting use on a limited basis. It should amend the comprehensive plan to allow the 0.30 acres of wetlands fill needed to construct the Fanno Creek trail segments in question. The rationale for this conclusion is that full protection of the three wetland sites, while maintaining existing environmental conditions, but would have important adverse economic and social costs. Full protection would require not connecting the long planned trail. Avoiding the wetland sites would require cost prohibitive boardwalk construction in addition to that already proposed or the re-routing of portions of the trail onto the street and leaving gaps and missing links in the trail corridor. The trail's social and energy benefits of providing outdoor recreation and improved accessibility clearly outweigh its wetland impacts. Providing a reasonably direct route through the center of the city for long or short trips and helping to reduce air pollution and reliance on the automobile are important social benefits that carry out Comprehensive Plan transportation and recreation policies and goals. The impact to riparian vegetation is very limited and again, one of the values of the urban Fanno Creek Greenway is to provide recreational, aesthetic, and educational opportunities for people. A counter balancing environmental benefit of allowing the fill is that the wetlands involved are of limited value (the mowed wetlands along the sports fields) and will be mitigated by the enhancement of a portion of the better quality wetlands on the school site. 10 e Title 3 1 n 1998, Metro Council adopted performance standards for the protection of streams, wetlands, and floodplains, called Title 3 of the Functional Plan. Tigard and the other jurisdictions within Metro are required to amend their comprehensive plans and develop codes to address these new standards by January 1, 2000. In addition to Title 3, Metro has adopted a model ordinance that provides approved examples of provisions that can be used by jurisdictions to comply with Title 3 performance standards. Although the City has not as yet adopted Title 3 compliance measures, the Metro attorney has determined that local comprehensive plan amendments related to water quality and flood management must comply with Title 3 as it stands during the period before adoption and acceptance of such measures. Since only the model ordinance, and not Title 3, contains standards for pathways, these are followed in this application in order to address the question of the present proposal's consistency with Title 3. The applicable portion of the Model Ordinance is Section 1.5 "Walkways and bike paths". This section reads as follows: b. A paved walkway or bike path shall not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the Protected Water Feature. For any paved walkway or bike path, the width of the Water Quality (Resource Area must be increased by a distance equal to the width of the path. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation. Where practicable, a maximum of 10 percent of the trail may be within 30 feet of the Protected Water Feature; and c. A walkway or bike path shall not exceed 10 feet in width. The trail alignment was developed based in part on the avoidance of significance natural resources and maintenance of the 10% standard specified in the model ordinance. However, due to development along the creek and the extent of wetlands within the floodplain, aligning the trail to meet the 10% standard proved impracticable. According to the attached chart, as presently designed, 33% of the trail including paved and boardwalk portions, is within 30 feet of water resource boundaries. The reasons for this amount of encroachment and the consideration given to alternative alignments that could reduce this impact are detailed in the ESEE analysis section of this report. To recapitulate briefly, Segment 2 is constrained by the sports field location. Segment 4 is constrained by the need to cross the creek bend and the configuration of the wetland within the greenway area. tt Segment 5, Grant Street to Main Street, is constrained by existing buildings (the Woodard Apartments) and the existing berm, which is located very near an oxbow of Fanno Creek, and also by the need to connect to the existing trail, which is close to the creek. Segment 613, Main Street South, is constrained by an existing building on the Dolan property. In each case, no alternative alignments are present. Although the alignment exceeds the 10% standard, the trail poses very limited disturbance to the existing vegetation and has avoided all forested and most scrub-shrub areas, with the exception of the two Oregon ash trees that need to be removed for the bridge over Fanno Creek in Segment 4. In order to compensate for the removal of riparian vegetation, however limited, and to enhance the vegetation along the creek, a specific planting plan for two highly disturbed sites of 0.83 and 0.78 acres, respectively, has been prepared (see attached). The planting plans are designed to meet the Title 3 baseline standard of 80% groundcover and 50% tree canopy using non-nuisance planting from the Native Plant List. Construction drawings for this work are under preparation. This proposed upland re-vegetation work is in addition to the mitigation required by wetland fill permit conditions. As a result of these two projects, the net effect of the trail project will be to improve the overall biological conditions of the riparian area along Fanno Creek. In addition to City of Tigard engineering staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to this project include David Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek (attached). Topographic, tree survey, wetland, and debris and noxious materials information is depicted in the base maps accompanying this report. The implementation schedule, including timeline for construction, mitigation, mitigation maintenance, monitoring, reporting and contingency plans are included in the reports. These timelines are subject to right-of-way negotiations and the timing of the necessary permits and approvals. I/Irpn/dr/trail.sela nds.ap 12 I'~ t 5~ cFr'. ,j fE • a I I e !11/81'PC Marred ~ Ea a of - \ 1 CH ENCR PLS 990' 11 I O:A 0 o Ru-1 Scapa ckstop Br11 ouUs school B fWnnNg f1a10 \ - _ ~F I Sost \ l 'j ~o Mon R d I 5/8' eon Rod p _I { - Na GOD CONTR - ~t Ha Rod CZ., Work ul 1n4 PS 1 I . Bent •iitnesJ Y RIC Marked Coup Si I 0.0 E i Course Sin UEA CtN& t• Equipment \ 1 d Egpmenl- 6 1 Iron Rad- Mo,ked ONTROL' 4f 5 N ro'1 9*69E nn _A - _ m'- _ 66aa / E4uipmenl \ 4~ 1® 1 t N RRR s ' , ll a N v \ 0 r O I ° ° Q 6 \ r l r 6* Ch Ic N 052146,3974 link Fen 4 ~,1 E 7315154,4697 ,bh ^ r , A AP r 0,• I a I!) 11 N~ .Vi°Y 1 1 I I I t I Fsial 9OeeaR f p\ EI \ I I I I..J ~ 4a2 r j 10404.51 P~0 Canal Sled Pool.-'. n. 4 p --4..------ I F4.~ I ; 1 E -IiI \ 0 ~ 1 L ROW ♦,Ar ` G ~ i 1 I~ /1\ 1 i i i ~rk1 1 Tap of Boni I I I / vv vv Curve Table Curet No, tarn ih ft flatlim It Ddlo Ton 0 ' I 6611 I .4 14.21 10.00 01-23-52 1 1234 i 70-42-13 7.09. 1 ( 1 J \ I / 0 I \ \ 57.09 74,00 44-12-13 30.05 I , \ \y / \ \ 4 1. 134.00 59.65 16 I I 1., 20.79 50.00 23-49-OS 1 \ \ 6 294.34 1)&00 95-22-02 19&61 • Z 34s1& r~ 40 , 5/_I,- aRod ` 1 \ 1 53~ IDO.m '.A-s1-34 27.00 7 I 1 W BEC PLS 2553• 42.17 100.00 24-09-34 21.40 ka 36 5B+J., cM u~ARNEO J \ 1 ' 39.27 3&00 2&00 t 1L 1tI// { ' { ~I B r \ \ I ' 30.34 1&00 77-19_48 52.00 t' 11 1 Y 1 FANN09A 9975 1945 P 71 ®0 1\ 1 / 2282 15.00 06-23-10 14.06 1 1 I F £€t Iron Rod \ \ I \ 1 C-.9 //gg1YPpC LS 25 I I I s jIbEC PS 2554• \ e ' `t \ , , g . \ 1 \ 1 4.S t o hP moil` 1 \ 1,` \ .j Poth•oy LEGEND V 1 •NARRQW E 5 8 Iran Rod \ \ \ tG Markn 1 BRIDGE. Sign t• I. r _ {r6BEC PL2551• , I \ s WaUand impact Aran 6 \ Briaq ROW 1 \ \ e. Y ~ ~I 23/4"rose CaO 3 Marked q1Y OF OGARO \ 1 \ \ \ UNLAWFUL R1~OISTURB• \ 1 1 F 1 6. \ \ I l 3 34 \ I GT¢ M e • 514tl Poalm - 2 as @ 1 2 ns>~1411 CORNER ~Obo t 6&H310900 1 J 1/2 ALUMINUM CAP 'I 2.)5~ SEC1 MARNED"WASH. CO. ~•pEA CONTR(3.- 76157281201 a PC Marked J AC SURVEYOR 1982 R Top of Ball E/ 6 !§~ial UNLAWFUL TO DISTURB' 1 W/[2 Iron. Rod 35" 1 gs sistinq Aaphol!-. Tra9 E Pe ge i i y 154.86 - NOTE: Stoll Poet. rill be awn4ualed a Per PK ' SIM 1540 Rod an5 h \ \ 1 Standard Oala7 Na 192 ofttha Slai6ard • 5/6 Ir in ed ottn. red .roaINOD'cD'0'o, \ \ l - E 5 Oatoia... Pala sAd9 54 PO a9klnn dart. PoUnay ell t P and shito alr:ga roa.xon ,e/s \ v • \ mce - - - I , 'r 1 25 9 S' 25 A V t j 0 Eaisl^' Gwnd ~ Fanno Creek Trail Perm'st. 1 m J ab I \ Sheet of 11198 - ss slope, ~ ~ oar.. , •----~~•~~,'7 ti, A9gl+pala SAOUtdv b' OF 7/4 veal, - 3/4 - D (T ) 1 FANNO CREEK TRAIL SEGMENT 2 -T-161 0 +®40 4! VAMMiE T. XOUTEM TIGARD STREET TO TIEDEMAN AVENUE f.~ 0axmxe>w~Akn 4, ICAh SEGT~a? LAYOUT KIM erasAmf CITY OF TV ENOMEEl9NC DF.PAa@Rllr 0040 N+W- y i rbt N"" STDB'i WEC~1 wY.a ru r,e iaENa Y30 Sheet 2. Segment 2-TraII Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Over Summer Creek E~\EN~199~rANM9~rE l 1 j araome sJaub.. o lfamle~ pw m nn «we- , FFt 7 k~. MEADOW STREET m_ N N 632500.1356 I . E 7315613 9 2 61 { t~ .Wn (alai AC \ 1 ~T 2 coda. I I I I I - Curve Table 4ifi p / I I I I 1 ~i ` fi Cwe Na. langth (It) Rad4, t Odeu Tongent (N) C , r Y~/ s i 1 a I _ 21.1e l0 1217e5S 117.61 . 2 3/4• ¢ oss Cap / W 1107 15 49'54'50• 6.95 Tigard Cantr. Paht ~P o Na6Ca+0 / $ J 26.60 25 65'JY36' 10.W p t E 2 4 34.63 25 79'49'3C 2691 3 ] cMd - 12+oo - ° ✓ aa» 4 - 13x00 16N00 15+00 - _ - ° 36.15 25 6251'00" 22.06 4 I - 0epag PoU 6 J Eaial t Fro4 ° ~g I SaiR> b 4 - - - - v/mc u kad I 1 F.tutst IEolharha trml+ a 'OHEC Pl 255.7 I 1 D.O.T. Cmtre4l' o I Iyal I 1~P / A 1• Metra Q{ I' Robert B Chr'sl ne Everett F~ 600 NE 0rund Are. I 131 I I F9 Seel' sD 10240 SW 3Veel W . C PaUand, OR 9728 ( 1'igord, OR OR 972 9722] t 3 1 Alum \ ash. CoCane. 1962gp w Es oa ath y e Cen~ma". I 1',' r~ 1 I - -S 1 , 40' ,..9{ 12ppRC Ma Id ethay CmlaCa f ~y N. 'DEA Control' t " RZ Fa F= I \ tw tars Kenneth k Alice Tolle- - io^ of 10200 SW Koth«lne Street ,ldusson SUeal 1 1; Ha k I I r.gad, OR 97223 1 1 I I R~/~4°re Roa 1 +D.1 to r sonlt rY I ; [ 0 RIm.15 15 I 1 1\ i~ - ~4• woo I 1 E ' ii \ $ ( S~6pc uan e \ \ rM B Assoc PL5.2 64' i \ \ ./Y kon a.e m 6' Chain M Woll 1 [ F EO Guard Posts - - - - _ _ - - - `I II A - Son tart ® o 4. ibH~p~H~ I L mll9 sanila+I~Cho'nN~oard Fm P7pone 1 Sg s 1 I- Rod 1 + PC 1111gd 1 scow- u Sanil ykEA Contr. F r 1 ~ I se,c:e Q1400. +00 ~ 3+00 0D ~m=1 2 Achar Pa Se"oot 4 E. eta ' % sW PK Nog tlll0ald 19.9 7 , ! Pa 7 / wr rr rqo a / P Z. FM i. ' j uus sr nm a.a / 00 Z5•. Y 5' Z5 0-a-=.77 rq«a. OR 97223 A .u. .may J mslope I?.gpsgats.W,"kla ®•'QF.3/4•_0 (Nal, _ y+• - or (7y,) eel F~'N° i i 100, e\ Fanno Creek Trail Permit 4GAL_SECTIQN' Sheet of 11/98 ` 0. NE T. ar~mx FANNO CREEK TRAIL-SEGMENT 3 ie4 TIEDEM9AN AVENUE TO WOODARD PARK ~ 4asaA LAYOUT _i 2. ISO gg~ dTY OF 1) DiWEEI6N00FpM541tT 6ARIXEN N. ANJIEIE 6RE6W F0.E N0 290 0WG NAME ` wmu.aan 1 lgaN~3RE Lt 1 SlTeet 3. Segment 3 Frail Location 41Ja~# a0aQMm ~pg,_ 16\ 9291 ~_.7 _ 77 f Y l N ( f ` S 1 ! t f f W l/ C j ~ ~ ~ ! f/ Sp 1; 1 Y1 r ` F,1 9 I ! / f k t3 ! wat Paukq Lot Propwty Ons t~d e kao / E\~•'et (rye 0xtronk wm I \ f R . ;y / P q\~,\ \ p 9aza sm tyere St 1 6/ltl / 1 \ \ 1 v d A, -7 vuuro OXM ` / LEGEND Slop Wand Are* 3 / % \ \ 4 y ^ t vfttiora Wgmt Arco - g \ -~s Area N Po 4 ' 5' s' 2.5 _3r Cie= WETW40l --~MP#,Cr r io m lq ato a- (TIP) OF 7N•-0 zus° ffi R/w i j Curve Table C.,b H. t-9u (to w~~e n -to -9-1 (it) Fanno Creek Trail Permit - - 1 1317 SD Ir2mor 7.62 - - - f 14 x %40 so 557x79' tam Sheet of 11198 [ .7 - 7 td47 50 557754• 2634 r 4 50.56 200 14-"W 2542 • -j ( 5 64.57 210 2e1316• 42.96 _ 6 6@.30 200 ?J17N' ee.66 Baas 100 26SV16 25,7 FANNO CREEK TRAIL m SEGMENT 4 she °e 9AXwa T. MMM WOODARD PARK TO C3RANT AVENUE asp .n.+mr F LAYOUT p e+~El6wc to Penttmas pwc w,A ~Rti E "a~ r w $ QTY OF MGAW ,~.a~aw wa 290 t7B99- 1~~twCY1296~TAww9e\sst I m.m `.LC rWmx L1 ge Over Fanno Creek C__~ Sheet 4. Segment A Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Brid KARLUM $L ft 544. ,gpla IB°9' Jl `M9°N t-. / J Jxp Yqull li' CI8 P ^ R7n+155.17 P '7 / a. '7:, A/sN' um Foe Fxav ~aF d, w cog AM I1t1 Sa 0.1 rypa w ln77 ♦ J B \ 5y Pia 114 M CRY.4f4wd ~yy7 1112b IM IN Ippa on 9Wn2J 1 \ " I 1 ,d+ 7• 6 r 8 a,- E.W C9.a , ltil lmx a `p/fir" 0a A t /,0M J IJi'FT Fw - I 1 / AOC ppAy e 'p(3, Cm4rf 6 a..4,.p1 7NA mt I How / pri. End Cambuotbn R- /a k Swn1 9iw / aaq I 1 I 1755 ua »..m s,w.. P 1/2• Fan R. I " 651257.9912 / tpu.w, W 97711 FPC upF 1 I E 7616237.1141 J •I7A Cm 9 I JWn Et&t Corte Path / I 1 Cora UW. / ,51ss sr wm aM / R I I rgpa w e7u7 - Yvkn tr°.pVx / 55529 SE fair A- / 9an0. .Mt 97311 c I Pa h r as• s' s as 1 1 Exist" Gr 21/2• scar C.. T J'Ctaa7 C. AS 1~'Nan Wa1 1 o 0.L 115719.1' ~ / Foe upFa ,J 1 a my I aNVr 2x st'" We 'g! t4EP995 VFM'aIH` Na• Awraga Vwliq C,mm<r ABpregata AaAde:i~i. a wa:°ai»~ 1p. Malt m to - 0' (77P) 6' or 1'-6 asvr swp\,\ Scefe: a 50~ Nova .9 , i 12* e "0 ra ® J r nOP ob / / xl wm r.wmml / LnF /mtr tCEryS.f+a pmM 181 P.\ o• 157 V / e / ~p a \ i r J r JS1.N Pi _ F d I7551 Sp Yob 5VM t J 6 J 1;9-.OF97223 p tlp4~' Ipm je / e alto Curv:'7eble - 7enpM,t pJ ~ 9w./..a./awp ~1ae s°' E laps Ma. 1.M,p1n (ft) RadF7p n 77dtu I 13,71 10 96n6'Iw' 10.00 ,~q J / pd .w T'irol' ° 93,71 10 9045.56' 1002 _ _ / / - \ a♦' o r rF: pv.m1 1 63,38 75 49.12.44' 3cm 4 1816 25 427690• 9.67 5 11.55 75 24'06'11' f801 5 art i - 4 lies 71 41m95' 3875 0. DI H sJl• ups Fa . ~ Fanno Creek Trail Permit a3,s9 25 6I 30W 2i 14 Sheet Of 11/98 6 17.94 23 41'09!4• ' 9.1T t I' 4 FANNO CREEK TRAIL-SEGMENT 5 01 mg 4` "b Y GRANT AVENUE TO MAIN STREET LAYOUT OTY E"041EEW"0 pEP7Ji1567l7 TAE M0. 260 - 090 NAME: Sheet 5. Segment 5 Trail Location is 6"~`E"" ACME *\CNAIt18AEA"OD~Sr1E L1 +sse ®/a~ wucom 7tw~AA ~~+'~^-m"e k6Y6- ._.._J..,_..t7...,..+ _ .w~:l ~_.v.w~~..v ~,~._...Iu_~_. v...~r. ,[may .,7~•v_.±. ';F y; _ a a I ! - I41+ ..r... - ar.r-__+_.1L.LV.ui ........~..y_.+•1~.4..w... .uL_~..:,~'3'-L..ur.~~f-r.r~_...~Si.~.-..~+4.~.c .w.- ~ ..lv__u'....-W......-.~r. .r~u....a... v ~ . Curve Table •1 C rb Na LnOM (a) Rodluf n Ddta Ya~6n! (tt) r.J 1176 19.17 411WSW 7.20 17.17 Is SD1D'1s• 7.04 E . 3 16.49 91.70 7TSS'IS' 9.55 \ 4 2140 is SZW531 15.26 5 42.33 its 2118115' 21.40 6 19,7) 200 0s77s2' 9.66 5' WOODEN FENCE ON f 7 &74 10 sOTJS'26° 4.67 RETAINING WALL 12OTTOSS RG { MAIN t 6' CHAIN i d +S LINK FENCE m$g \ Y. DANO & CHRISTINE HAMMOND 12562 SW MAIN t k, EatMnnl Eovvant PolNvoy ; A $ ~ III \ ~ ~ 11i, 8 YAt! va f, Rclin ' \P &W pC I S' aaa C AL' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FpRL I,~ L 6 y Ir a1 3/4•-p E0.0,9 C~d 411 / ` ~ ~ \ -C d _ 400 -l. Easanna PA771YLAY Eawnnl`. S I IlJ ) 4! F- 9 Z i / DOLAN k COMPANY INC I ' I / f A-D0Y ELECTRIC 12520 SW MAIN STREET 1B' a 6'.6ue L- I, I I Vi e' v 0' 1 . \ P7vr PAVE N. STEVENS STEVENS MARINE I I l 9180 SW BURNHAM STREET i I 66tex7 6auA6 Fanno Creek Trail Permit I i Sheet of 11198 i SEGTIQi~ 1B-H : , r, A YANNk T. WMMN FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT OS AT MAIN STREET +mas LAYOUT 6AleEEM N. CITY MCMD ENC94EERING IDEPAR➢kN7 Sheet 6. Segment 6b Trail Location and Bridge Over Fanno Creek, yP.fE~" CREW" iN.E PW: .260 a%C NNE` - t~liElE .we la w9. mve T _ - r wrl!✓$ Awxi,ronaw °r ' ~°m+N'^ixmr aP66 1t\EKG\I9*9\rdHN66\S"[ L1 F -^~.--""--.-..,...-.ten-.- - ' EXISTING PIPERS WILLOW FOREST 1 w//, uaR a i" ~ Cd9e al ° ~ I '1DCN fNU1 PLS 990' ~ . :I ad I io+1a Sdidd o ` BaYlisld ~ Fowln Shod Runnrq TIdQ 5 Backstop . n I 8.4 fldQ-~ r JNOBCOP oe~ Wm,~ lrmRd ` SHRUB ENHANCEMENT AREA 4 PS PC Oak 1 i _ EA CONRi 1/ 'Iron Nod nes W-k-t /j1t ~ I 10.0 / Y ' 'Fit. w PC 4atrd Cwrs 5 Equipment 1 ~ ~ ~ ; Course 5. n "DfA CIXJIRa' 6 ' o eoul i j ¢ N ' , X- tgripmmf ( 1 Rod rI ~7\Dq/ZRPCNan 4orked {I 6 Wak°ut I I 1 quipment \ r~ n - Tom- _ _ _ r~ 1 I 1 + r O wy ` + p O Q O 'Path CenIMF¢ u Ek)gm O OD O e I ¢ ¢ ~y~ ¢ \ pt N 652140-I14 E 7515151.1897 q,rk Fm + 1 0 3 ' Wet Si°¢w° - ¢ D EXISTING OREGON ASH FOREST PROPOSED -st. S Steel Posts e¢, a; ~ + D PIPER'S WILLOW eans-r~ r,Q i ----4 PROPOSED FOREST D RDW\ , D OREGON ASH 1 t ' I I 1 i ( I 1 \ \ Zr i' Tap of Dmk \e\\ FOREST 1 P - I t r % \ 7// I 1 s cmaR~ \ t \ \ % 5!8' IRIX! R00 _B EC R5 2553' Al. CAP MARKED F~ I A \I \ 1Y+ I WW%URANASNI Ply 195 I q w I I FANN09 199Y I I 5 8" Nan Rod \ \ I d G: ti//19C flaked \ J e d 9r, I i P LS 2553' P N.a a`` , f \ Pathway ' \ I LEGEND \\D 4arkeq I RIMEQWSign PA 5 8"CPI IronSRod2553' I / //MC Marked i¢aUand MIpOCI Arm 'pBE Bridq ROW \ I \ 3 t j Mafied CITY OF"'DCARD SURVEY CONTROL UNLAWFUL TO DIS-RB" \ t 31. 1 27+00.35 ' 3 31 \ CE M e C,%L Sled Posts. - 2 m. J A EW COW13 um l r ~a o I 27 89.61 [ 651U3.09P,8. .2.75' 2 }1~2i}WAU~4INSN.U CAP ~ro A CONTROL' 75157%.taO1 E 4A ED CO. W PC 4orked 2 a~ ~ : SURVEYOR 7932 /rTop of Oar* i, GEI 86 ' SPEED 35' 4 UNT.AWflII TD D69URB' 1 2 Iron Rod 11 AsphMl. Tr°a Pt is a = it it 174M i MOM St" pod. shill be -111 algid Ve Per Pi I I SIU 15iN05 Standard Was Na, 192. a1 'the St-dad .twlxaa.'t'd'OO. 5/8" Mon Rod Gotoi¢..Potts ~ be Parted with red ¢7sN,m aah/o Pothrv7 • • \ \ rd con roe ,¢/a and .hlte..slrtpsa, e \ \ ` r gn m.. 1 i. trherq GWnd S o L PAST DEIAL s Daa,.D. ,C fanno Creek Trail Permit N.T.S. Sheet of 11198 I F dn 2$ Sao" \ ,may i... ~ _ _ ~ r rgo1$/9audD* (T ) FANND CRC-EK TRAIL - SEGMEN7 2 VANNIE T. WCUMN. Ti4iARD STREET TO TIEDEMAN AVENUE t , LAYOUT ? TYPlC~SECTION Sheet 7. Existing Conditions and Proposed Enhancement Mitigation N.T.s ~~~g 'nGARD cNaNE~e+T FEES aaa DwDNA4F: d to STAFF EXISTING WETLAND CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED ENHANCEMENT REDS iSF90- N\tNL\IfY®\FWNOa\SPIE L1 ,c ._r; ..~,_-',..mow _ .-~...~~.wv ~._W.... -~:31,~. y ~i.c......,+..ue...J>i-. ~~...tM.ru-u ...«~1.. ~_r -,~~v: .~.ti_:..'dL i. a: ..~~.~~u.f ,.~,•_..~_cw.__ $ h r i F' h Quantity per Approx. Planting Total # Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Type Size (minimum) Template Area (sq. ft.) Plants i Oregon ash raxinus latifolia FACW nursery 5 to 6 feet tall 1 31,700 317 r 1 Trees Oregon ash** raxinus latifolia clump of 3 every 50 feet 13 I' Piper's [Hooker] willow alix piperi 1hookerianaJ FACW cutting 4 to 5 feet tall 3 7,000 210 ' **Total Oregon ash trees = 330 ~l W red-osier dogwood Cornus stolonifera [sericea] FACW si ckry 2 to 3 feet tall 2 3,300 66 Shrubs Pacific ninebark Ph socar us ca itatus FACW- sto kry 2 to 3 feet tall 1 3,300 33 clustered wild rose Rosa isocar a FAC nursery 2 to 3 feet tall 2 3,300 66 Fanno Creek Trail Permit Sheet of 11198. LEGEND loft. Consultants in ecology and P I r - 71 natural resource management Fanno Creek Trail - Fowler School Site j X X = number of plants within template J DRAWN: S. Benjamin Mitigation Plan ` APPROVED: M. Walker • toff. OMAN Fishman Environmental Services PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS 1- j 0 434 NNV Sixth Avenue g Suite 304 DATE: 11/16/98 L Portland, Oregon 97209-3600 Sheet 8. Proposed Planting S ecifications Fi re # Pro ect # 98073 9 P (503)224-0333 J y t~-- e~ *x~-`~`,/;,,'ti` 04> H Ito A re ",•l~ ~{sPt'; bY!;4 ',i^q~a,'tt& •d' ~'~x~r~'`+ , -'6w~ h i 'i3' 'Y~ < ~ a a <~J' ~ rk. .'t•"~ ~M^'14 ,4"'4eL~'P +.1~~,'~ ,ti~~"`"A g„ r• ) ~t,,, .yt'~°"' M4.."`~i P ink + „+r .C.$~ tn~4t a~'', y, Ax;$,~a a<w ;e°`,.1"L7 a r x•}' ~ A~ n.;Gat 4 p -~~=~ri'#`.~?"~"+t,~t, y ,J .'%,,s.,'1,lkS' i• ~ y, 1m' iF t ,~f 'GCt~ y r 7. ~ efi,'' - i r rl, , b ti `,a~N 6. ~ ~ k d}. r ut, M~ s ,t^„ 3 s et*~ ,yet a , I,~. , ~t •t„ 6r, t3 < zf~:elr, ~ , ~ t(q, r u y t W 'fir r wi, .w ,~s . F' ~,f~ ;'~~hl'," , +f t c -L: ~,i E`'~' •7- ' ~S' l~ ,f t: 't4<g~.5 i r ,I Y~ ' 'tr''# 37 ,•r' r,°, ~ .1i t~ ~~';.;,r."ar;%r~`~'i,t..,trr,~ ►t-gp~ .y'~" '!4y.l.rtw •n~',,y}+d„ 5, e' i. ~ly"y"r~~:$.a' 4~•+ t''z,C:1-". 't l.: r1.~~ S' ;,,y`^° "'~a'~` I., ~t. ~y.3~~,1 a4yry'S F., Yi',"~ ,Y,•~~A ~cf~~',!"ygR~t ~'s"rY'?1_t ,}~:~~''ra .y~y,`,!},ry'- ~LLU ?~'~,yM~••:r ~ s c y3r ev ,y y. ~,V Y'x~'y'~'4Y•",. U. 'H 4 k! ` f; N it'd It It rAi.^ 1~'NY;%~. ~"'+'M1 ,'a 3~Y r~~ ,t'v. ',FX,y{'Rr''• I'6 ~9 R' { ~ •;i d ~"4 '~S `~~k P ¢ ~ 7'a"~ 4t' a r'. + ry„~i • ~ 1 t',.Kta<~ J,^y ,+;~~ra L.., 4:;V~~+` r_ ~ r .mi>«`r~;e"~4.,".{r tt t 1~~,,A ,,,a+s Y, w .rp V"- 5'c r fi 1 , p.c •,C,;..a' .r.. "'6t.f ,IJ,.a,SJ 1 t-~ ,phr 2 00 tr i .:II 7 7! +k•'l.r. ,gy ti , t 4~tjf.LLp. u y r. 4 r n.w y M e ' YpY a+' $rq( z ~ ~ ' L'J!' . ~,.r ~ d:>,{. } f fi r r "I rC,, ',r r,. t ~`t a t i ` Yz, {'~l "L `t'' :,i Amin # -e '?R •a yr 4`4 ~°'w u' s 's rrj 1 4 ,k f, r }c t Otto R , t°,iy*, T• ti'ur ,9!•. '^Y \ i:'1 P,°, ~ ?tf'r". ~ ~ •x} is 4. ' a 'u ? r ~ r ! ) ~~y~ , ~ y , a,, ~ j v.'~•,-,~# e t Z F § y fi• a x ° F y,'' i Y e. Vii' A k¢ As F~- 't 7 ' f s ~ •dr' m. t t S' - ,I f ~ J r'R, • r' N", ~ ! '1 - s' s ~ ~,je r 7aA'f~r ~ ri a,+.t ~ r ~•!e,~ ra7 F i 5 t ~ d ".I d- r F~ r, yx. r w n ns`.'"> .r r w text- Js e p p $N ~T w 'T a a'P..t r~Xt .,Y rr 1 a< 4 q r'kr~ Sr': u'4 't u ! . r 1S4~dA:. p r4 f Sri F T r3y,.r f 'yq'Ir"V . y F'^d~'S'` ot,. --t ^%~-v`~~'t f r✓ rt r.;. A •.c~~P'g* 1 - "Zl , ~"'r e ti 5 i} a~ k Aga +.•kS.•..• tr 1 ra~,x. a;t Y rt r #r ^ gnrrt's^ a?'!{ '+'5:_ ♦ ',~'v. a., ! ~.Cr'",.p i•47X ` .~-J,°X 4 E "<P `4t 1 a rw 'r,; 1 V 14 - q + a r 7 k'w'r a r.vn tk $ e+f`1 dr "t' r ri t + 4! , a+' e r . .u 7 , ;M' r Ln } r .z t X. y a Yh 1 4 z' bS , w.{` - r ~,,;~~:i''~ a?.A ~i~~, ''i~. 1C, r•~ 4f ti ~ ~ Tt~'M t '4. }~4 w^ri rr r ,.g t t~ " p~ ' , istF+ ,1' rr"c r s•„t.`..'~~, r - n' ~u*''~"'' St't+ kl+r 1,5 it 1x Sd z ,y r t rs k t 4 r„ . er i. ',k t•t.' r ~r'k, CkR' k t1~4 r`T r, t r 4yt y,", Pj U a r ld .r :x .;y'~{F~,~ p f,~aLky >f.tF "~?`kr }tp t x dL / ?1G +'.SY~` l 4. , r' , ~ ~F 1 n, tII tr~•z, 1., . r, *5 - Sr4~i!`'r~w;t;irtl' ti . ^ p:. _J p r'n "a y ~ I t X k `"R ~ r y w,:. a ~ tr ~ '•Y +s r 7 1"' ANY? 4.~ i,'z t Y •;?+,IY' "1', x~," F d > A'z .•lie+•l' r. '~.e„ ~r'1 2 r r ""fi L , ,`1 'kn, rww i !n a' 1 ll aa~-~a.~~~~ 1 S= r,~ytirY+ .,.~n'dtt,u ,r .,?rs t ~ .'°^~•"JI, 'Y 8'~``r n:V^ i ~~lk~ t:'}~ t•'.~~~*, kl.~,.'R~M~~+,. d + ":>H:~i ,i'Vl .3}f ~~°"s' . s~°"` i•f 1v ti'rv,?, r : Y' ~4r~t~ d $ x ~1 N~~, $,~1 .r ~r ? 1t~ r -rt r' • v..,,tm.,. s L! . 1-.5 ° _'J z s~ P y I ° M 4 r . il, 2 4 + r i rw 'Y1xws>P.•a`1',, sa{''34 0 - nro" d Y ^ "'HUN (~~~~Y"t° ;r e,i t„r rw } ,.ce,S,,>,. ~rry •4~ Y X ~p t+ - 'nw ."""^-~-tt~ e tw / r t- r't('1 ' r O}r t . T „7"'L t ~ !~z e.J,Y",s~+•'^. ' s~" r , c v'. r"~ b / .~K 1 r t . , :'.)'t 1"c . r a„a.,w a y t , r. y i"~.. - ° ''r ~ r yr: 5 + k • r Ir- } ~s a 1 r 41°,,.et1'f^R'~, X.. ,,,"`Ary.,..1 .'r•,~ M,+;~ /L 7'"-. t""` ,r ' ~j,•F{,tr `}tri9`r 'I E'r: '•~;.r ~ya.L's. ;,)'d"z"%4j 7r;+r:• ,t 1 ~i'~"-~'rO~' L'<F't'+t`r .3' gYS'as ,.Sr °~A"M; ••,'`yJ}r Ya Fs`;i^+~,R . z. ;.kro G , ! .1 ti •a •'i L, t `'r ,f, r 1 !N; .7.Y,.t'~S. R":' .y*, r! a Cp/~Jr', 7;;i:; y;.r~.,$ "'".M { "~aa.•y u :'_i s i tr a r tUA'K," a § F k e . +.c • : u rd iaF",> t r w "E ~ s `J 'r+4. ro! . 4;, : Y~ r.a•~;,aw'• i : s a. A~ I _ ~,.i+ " ~ ~2-ate- t .i° ~ 't ,f, '"~.arit;, t'"`N ,~x t - v a'• w r r 1 :9 7 Cv `•i ~ ~ / ~ i i i . , ~ r~~ h ~ ~ r)Y % }a? ,t4..~.4' ' @ d~.;'"4,.•Jy, ~vzr1,r ,"'~y, r, at % fi,Y r• ,;b`f', ,4 Gt.4.: ~Y A"'~' .lr< .,t~R „s/: .,T , ly MtYr I - .,ydn5 ti ~1t 5 " .aa33 r „a, 4 _r ~r ¢sk~' yp~ r ae.~ y~ yie t it j a ia+6 ri tiI ~4"L^" x t r y~1~WC~»y~1 try<r~aer ~r :dad v`~u re 'ureeua r tr`'3r. ,"t Maaa:" •`Lf. z.. f.~ 12 RVFN µx 't.;•r? N} et+ r~'1 °r F ~ , t, gk~wF t Fl 6. . ~5 ~y ao~, r e - ~ ~y r~fkr. ~p'p-*•~~.•~; s' 1P,,a~,,,,< L3; v r< f ~ t } ;s1 ,t t „•1 d3t.,.,,,,,_~+.1",~ 1e.~ 'x,ra r ~a! <.at'.a * ~..v F,. +•5~,., t';;~r£ .,2 et. rw',i :«q-,n o•r ' ~ ~ r A 4a kid f 3~r~v •yti' .K ~'S~(~""'4 : re . '.~d: $ &;,'~~N~ ~3.a: .,q5 ~dF'F~ p •xi'~.f,~ t ~ ~ 77 a _ 1 - "~','`t r~ T r r?• : y, <p: ;"'iJ pry a;+;r, at e A} : „ "0• (7 "r . 7 - +A. , a a ir! T r 1 ~rI iL. .r r5;.r"y r ,rr• r,y R ~I.- _Y!~rS"•' - r i r .,w Sur ' it •.:i~ t ^ 4 - •r t ? ~ ~ ti z Y t iv1 7 -,J~,~ .v d rE,'~, i J ij ate' r;' i 4~i V Y°'4 :~~y r.. ~:t~ '4 k~: y. ~l aw Y~.t~f`r9'u.Y.7"rr 4f +~F& ;.~.a ~~~5 •i '.I' _~:1 by ,~,R s ;d" ~v:y. j~ .Py ~f`, a, ~ ~ yt ~ , + .z r ,d~~ Sri t r~ r~u`r~< ht •a ;iZ F 2 x~y~,„ s' A,Y tt y y ~ Any, ",X tJ4, N . L p > t I ! • a :t:.~"R'~4 . . fi`.L:Bmn .«...e4.F3w" , , - i Community Development I9rtdab..`ai 1. 4rp1ndudne'wctmapapr r Sheet 9. Digitized Aerial Photograph of Mitiztntion Sit'. , ,.7- 777 1 vom - m fr w „ a no= AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF 6-22-99 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE FORWARD INITIATED BALLOT MEASURE TO WASHINGTON COUNTY ELECTIONS DIVISION FOR THE SEPTEMBER 21 1999 SPECIAL ELECTION PREPARED BY: Cathy Wheatley DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK L/4''--~ ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the City Council approve the proposed resolution to forward the initiated ballot measure to the Washington County Elections Division for the September 21, 1999, Special Election? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached resolution and direct the City Recorder to do what is provided by law and necessary to place this matter on the September 21, 1999, ballot. INFORMATION SUMMARY The attached resolution was prepared as the result of the process that has been followed for placing an initiated ballot measure before City of Tigard voters on September 21, 1999. Members of the organization, Citizens for Safe Water have followed the necessary steps required by law to place this matter on the September 21, 1999, Special Election ballot. If approved, the ballot measure will amend the City of Tigard Charter as described in the resolution. A draft explanatory statement has also been prepared and is attached for City Council information. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Consider a competing measure for the September 21, 1999, Special Election. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY This will affect the Vision Task Force Goal to actively participate in regional development of water sources and a adequate, innovative funding mechanisms to develop those sources for Tigard users while exploring local options for water reuse and groundwater sources. Also affected is the strategy to "form a consortium of neighboring jurisdictions to develop a regional water plant for Willamette River water." FISCAL NOTES Estimated cost of the election is $16,764. (This was calculated by using the number of registered voters in the City of Tigard times the estimated cost per ballot of 75 cents. 22,352 x .75 = 16,764.) I:%DM\CATHY\ELECTION\STAFF REPORT - RESOLUTION FORWARDING BALLOT TITLE TO SEPTEMBER 1999 ELECTION.DOC AGENDA ITEM # FOR AGENDA OF-4L99 Sef- od e;l 1-0 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON (D (y~ IGG COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Pacific Ride Inc. Re guest to Use Ci Pro e for Priv a Wetlands Mitigation PREPARED BY: Duane Roberts DEPT HEAD OK TY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should Council allow Pacific Ridge and the Specht Company to use City property for private wetlands mitigation? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve the request subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. INFORMATION SUMMARY Pacific Ridge and the Specht Company have submitted a joint request to use city parkland to mitigate for the wetland impacts of the Autumn Crest and Tigard Triangle projects, respectively. The proposed mitigation sites are five small areas located within Fanno Creek Park just behind city hall (see map attached). In June 1996, Council adopted a formal policy addressing the use of City property for private wetlands mitigation. The attached submittal prepared by the applicant's wetland consultant addresses these criteria. The propose mitigation plan is consistent with the Fanno Creek Master Plan, which calls for the majority of the park area to be a nature preserve. According to the plan, the natural vegetation and habitat areas are to remain undisturbed or altered to improve their natural character and ability to support the area's wildlife inhabitants. If properly implemented, the proposed planting plan will improve the park's natural character. The applicant's final mitigation plan has been reviewed and endorsed by the Operations and Engineering Departments. Staff recommends the city impose a charge of $14,740 for the use of the land. This amount is based on the $20,000 per acre rate recently charged by the Tigard-Tualatin School District in two recent cases for the use of school property for private wetlands mitigation. The rationale for charging Pacific Ridge and the Spect Company a fee for a project that will provide a positive benefit is that the demand for mitigation sites in the Portland area is high and, based on recent information, the prevailing private-sector rate for the use of land for wetland mitigation appears to be in the $20-30,000 range. Patricia Uber, the applicant's wetland consultant, will be present at the Council meeting to overview the mitigation plan and respond to any questions Council may have. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Do not allow the applicants to mitigate on City property, and instead preserve the sites for future City mitigation use as needed. Charge the applicants at a lower or higher rate than the proposed $20,000 per acre for the use of city property. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY The proposal addresses Growth and Growth Management Goal #1, which calls for protecting natural resources, and Urban and Public Services Goal #2, which calls for citizen education aimed at wetland protection. FISCAL NOTES Staff proposes the city charge the applicant $14,740 for the use of city property. i:1ci tywide\sum\paci flcridge.sum CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: City Council FROM: Jim Hendryx DATE: 7/14/98 SUBJECT: Pacific Ridge and Specht Development Request to Use City Property for Private Wetland Mitigation Pacific Ridge, Inc. and the Specht Development submitted a request to use city greenway along Summer Creek for the off-site mitigation of an upstream commercial project that will disturb 9,200 square feet of wetlands. The proposed mitigation site abuts the proposed city wetland enhancement at 121 st Avenue. The proposed enhancement project covers approximately 0.74 acres and includes the removal of existing areas of Reed Canarygrass and its replacement with native riparian and wetland species. Long Range Planning, Engineering, and Operations have reviewed the plans for the project and recommend Council approval of the project as designed In June 1996, Council adopted a formal policy addressing the use of city property for private wetlands mitigation. The policy stated as follows. It is the policy of the City of Tigard that city owned property may be used for private wetlands mitigation. The City of Tigard will consider proposals for such mitigation on a case by case basis subject to the following: 1. It can be demonstrated that there is benefit to the city and the general public. 2. The mitigation must provide a documented physical enhancement of existing wetlands. 3. The city should be compensated for the use of the area either through rent, lump sum payment, benefit to the city, or as agreed to by the City Council. 4. The wetland mitigation should demonstrate no additional cost to the city for maintenance or other factors unless acceptable to the City Council. The present proposal addresses these criteria in the following ways. The proposal calls for the removal of noxious vegetation within five small areas of Fanno Creek Park, all located behind city hall and its replacement by native species. This work implements the recommendations included in the Fanno Creek Master Plan. The mitigation under discussion is a physical enhancement of the existing wetland. Replacement of the monotypic area of Reed Canarygrass by diverse native species will improve the water quality and wildlife habitat value of the wetland and riparian area. To compensate for the use of city-owned greenway staff recommends the city charge a fee of $14,740. The applicant's proposal does not offer a cash contribution to the City. However, the imposition of the proposed fee at the indicated rate is warranted based on the prevailing market value of mitigation sites. As for the fourth and last criteria, the project will not obligate the city in any way. The initial project and any additional work and maintenance, including plant replacement, ordered by the Corps of Engineers or the Division of State Lands, will be provided by the applicants. Staff finds that the wetland enhancement proposal satisfies the criteria relating to the use of city- owned property for private wetlands mitigation and recommends Council approval of the applicant's request, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain a city sensitive lands permit and all other necessary permits and approvals required for the work. 2. The applicant shall obtain a street-opening permit issued by the city Engineering Department. 3. The applicant pay to the city the amount of$14,740. The proposed approval conditions will protect the city's interest by providing for city oversight and inspection and for the bonding of the excavation portion of the work and by capturing the market value of the land for private wetlands mitigation. SCHOTT & ASSOCIATES Ecologists & Wetlands Specialists 11977 S. Tollver Rd. o Molalla. OR 97038 o (503) 829-6318 o FAX: (503) 829-3874 AUTUMN CREST & TIGARD TRIANGLE WETLAND MITIGATION SUPPORT DOCUMENT INTRODUCTION The proposed mitigation is for two different projects and developers. Pacific Ridge existing permit requires off-site mitigation for a water quality facility, which was built on property it is developing off Scholls Ferry Road. Spect Development, Inc. needs off-site mitigation for its Tigard Triangle Office Complex. The Spect development proposes to culvert approximately 230 linear feet of an ephemeral drainage and a 35 square foot emergent wetland associated with the drainage. The mitigation will be implemented as one mitigation project. Pacific Ridge will be responsible for implementation of the mitigation area, and its monitoring. Spect Development will pay Pacific Ridge its proportion of the mitigation costs. The mitigation area is located on City of Tigard Property, which is located behind City Hall. The mitigation area is on Phano Creek, west of SW Hall Blvd. The city property was examined for potential mitigation areas, and approximately 10 different areas were identified as potential enhancement areas. The areas identified are existing low quality wetlands. Al! of the areas are dominated by reed canary grass, and are adjacent to either Phano Creek, or a body of water associated with it. MITIGATION Five different areas along Phano Creek and its flood plain area proposed for wetland enhancement. All of the areas consist of low quality emergent wetlands. The mitigation areas are designed to convert the emergent wetland into more diverse scrub-shrub/forested wetlands. The reed canary grass will be treated with an EPA approved herbicide for use in and around water (Rodeo) prior to planting. The intent of the herbicide application is to knock back the grass until the trees and shrubs have had a chance to establish. After the grass had been browned the trees and shrubs will be planted. A 30" diameter circle will be scalped around each planting location. A three inch thick layer of bark mulch will be spread around each planted tree and shrub. This will further help control the reed canary grass. Five different areas will be enhanced within the same general vicinity. Areas A, C and D (0.604 arm Acres) will be used for Pacific Ridge mitigation. Areas B and E (0.133 acre) will be used for the 12111111111 01111111 J Tigard Triangle mitigation. The amount of mitigation for Pacific Ridge meets the amount of mitigation original proposed by Pacific. Ridge on the Summer Creek mitigation project being developed by the City of Tigard. The amount of mitigation proposed for the Tigard Triangle project is nearly at an eight to one ratio. MONITORING A five year monitoring period is required for the wetland mitigation and buffer areas by the Oregon Division of State Lands and the Army Corps of Engineers. The monitoring will insure successful development of the wetland and associated buffer. If problems with the mitigation area develop contingency measures will be developed to correct the problems. There are numerous factors which could impact the development of the mitigation area, these include but are not limited to; establishment of unwanted plant species, incorrect hydrology, predation on the planted plants, disease, etc. The monitoring will attempt to identify any problems and their causes, and make recommendations on corrective measures. The corrective measure will be implemented by the landscape contractor. A monitoring report will be prepared after the'growing season. The report will document the establishment of planted shrub and tree species, The hydrological conditions of the wetland mitigation area, the ground cover in the wetlands, identify any observed problems, and suggest corrective measures. The report will be sent to the Oregon Division of State Lands, the Army Corps of Engineers. After each'site visit the landscape contractor will be contacted, and given instructions on what measures need to be implemented. If necessary, a site visit with the landscape contractor will be arranged to show him the problems and go over corrective measures. An eighty percent survivorship for each woody species planted is the goal by the third year of monitoring. This will be determined by counting the established trees and shrubs by species and then dividing by the total number planted. This fraction is then multiplied by 100 to obtain the percentage. Canopy coverage of herbaceous vegetation will be estimated by using 10 one square yard n&roplots. Area a will have four microplots randomly located, Area B will have one, as will areas D and E, Area C will have two microplots. By the end of the third growing season an eighty percent ground coverage is anticipated. Finally, fixed photopoints will be established, and photographs taken each monitoring year. Locations of the photopoints will be determined in the field, and then marked on a map. The location will depend on visibility of the mitigation areas. CONTINGENCY MEASURES As stated above, it is impossible to predict what may go wrong with a mitigation project, but there are some general areas which can be addressed. Specific contingency measures will be developed, if needed, during the five year monitoring effort. Possible problems are identified below. Invasion by exotic species Selective grubbing or herbicide treatment Survivorship of planted species Area too wetland for planted specie Replant with a more wet tolerant specie Area too dry for planted species Replant with a species which grows in drier conditions Insect damage Determine type of insect and use systemic or biological control MAINTENANCE During the period of the required monitoring the maintenance of the mitigation area will be maintained by the landscape contractor who had the contract to plant the mitigation area . They will be instructed on what needs to be done within the natural area by the biologist who has the monitoring contract (Schott & Associates). A follow up inspection visit will occur by the biologist to insure the corrective measures have been implemented. The landscape contractor will be required to inspect the mitigation area for unwanted plant species, and control them. The following is a list of species that the contractor will be required to control or remove; Canadian thistle English Ivy, Evergreen blackberry Himalayan blackberry, holly, Scots Broom, teasle It is anticipated that after the first three years of monitoring that control of these species will prove to be a relatively simple matter. Control measure may include, but are not limited to grubbing, cutting and selective herbicide treatments. Blackberries may be controlled with an appropriate herbicide. Reed canary grass should be controlled by application of Rodeo, an EPA approved herbicide for use in and around water. Control of Scots broom, English ivy and holly a may be most effective accomplished by grubbing and cutting. If the landscape contractor has had 2 prior success, or has knowledge of herbicides which are effective on these species, he may use ' them. Herbicides should be used selectively, and only applied by a licensed applicator. They should be applied only to individual plants, in order that other species are not harmed. I Herbicide application shall be by manual "spot spraying", wicking, or backpack methods as per manufacturer's specifications. Herbicide use in waterway areas shall be subject to approval and be strictly applied by manufacturer's specifications. Y Selective hand removal by non-herbicide methods shall be utilized if herbicide application threatens native plantings. All native plantings indicating damage by herbicide application shall be replaced immediately at no additional cost. N t FIGURE 2 Planting Plan Detail Key Scientific Name Common Name Specifications Quantity (d A.melanchier alnifolia Service Berry 24" 82 Cornus Scricea Red Osier 24" 604 Rosa nutkana Nootka Rose 36" 286 Spiraea douglasii Douglas Spiraea 24" 612 Symphoricarpos aiba Snowberry 24" .277 Crataegus Douglasii Black Hawthorn 36" 4 Fraxinus latifolia Oregon Ash 3675 2 ® Prunus virginia Choke Cherry 36" 1 Salix lasiandra Pacific Willow Cuttings 6 i i a~ i 3 a a ~ y7 r ~ n2 fy~-i C tlTY +Z kALL S i i III 141 1997 Metro aerial photograph showing approximate locations of proposed mitigation wetlands at Fanno Creek Park, Tigard, Oregon. Proposed mitigation wetlands to compensate for wetland impacts at Autumn Crest and Tigard Triangle development projects. r Q 150 C.B. X 149.5 BR. i, X / _ SR. 140 \ \ BR. IM3 ~M 136.4 a'''Y t,t X X 139.6 r r' i! 9R. a SR. S( ' 42.3 137.2 j ~p;S9rar r& ..06R BRUSH vi I c . I o.t ~Z BR q. 04 o ,35Z C - ! BR ` ~.4 X 139.1 ' I x 141.9 T i .~e ~ t F'~ • 142.6 x 14 SR. 1 \ G3 140 €1. . n 150 " 3 L~ I ~ x , 3 I . 1 Mitigation Enhancement Design o l Q SCAIF 1:1100 "IOU' 100 50 0 100 200 300 Q0 50011.11 ll Cs 50 40 30 20 10 0 SO 100 ISO METER _x arse, - ~ CL~x PC ' aQ x IIrb 0 x x BO i Q 0V f~ e o W.L. 1 y Q~ i ® z '148.4 S.P. x ~ IF i '71 '77 77 - SCHOTT & ASSOCIATES Ecologists & Wetlands Specialists 11977 S. Tollver Rd. • Molalla, OR 97038 • (503) 829-6318 • FAX: (503) 829-3874 April 28, 1999 Duane Roberts Planning Dept. City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Pacific Ridge Wetland Mitigation Proposal for Fanno Creek Park at City Hall. Dear Mr. Roberts: In a letter you addressed to Craig Petrie, dated 11/21/98, you requested additional information for a proposed wetland mitigation plan he submitted for Fanno Creek Park last November. Below is additional information required by city staff in order to evaluate and present the proposal to City Council for formal action. Also enclosed is a revised mitigation plan. The base map used for this revised plan is the Kurahashi & Assoc. map which you referred to in your letter to Craig Petrie. I have also included a copy of a 1997 aerial photograph of the project area. The approximate location of the mitigation areas are identified on this photo. Below, I have listed and responded to the pertinent policy, code, planning, and management issues that related to the wetland mitigation project in Fanno Creek Park at City Hall. • City Council's 1996 Policy - Use of city property for wetland mitigation. (Exibit "A") Approval criteria. 1. It can be demonstrated that there is a benefit to the City of Tigard and the general public. Response: This project is consistent with the master plans that have been adopted by The City for Fanno Creek Watershed and Fanno Creek Park. lilies 11000MM 2. The mitigation must provide a documented physical enhancement of existing wetland. Response: The enclosed aerial photograph identifies the approximate location of the proposed mitigation wetlands at Fanno Creek Park. As seen on this photo, the mitigation areas are located in unforested areas. Existing vegetation consists of reed canary grass and Himalayan blackberry. These undesirable, invasive species will be replaced by native wetland species. The existing low-quality wetland communities will be replaced by shrub-scrub and forested wetland plant communities. 3. The City should be compensated for the use of the area either through rent, lump sum payment, benefit to the city, or as agreed to by the City council. Response: All expenses for the enhancement project will be covered by Pacific Ridge, Inc. Expenses for the project include clearing of undesirable vegetation, planting, irrigation, monitoring, maintenance, and weed control. The standard estimated cost for mitigation wetlands is $35,000/acre. 4. The wetland mitigation should demonstrate no additional costs to the City for maintenance or other factors unless acceptable to the City Council. Response: As stated above, Pacific Ridge will assume the entire cost of the project. The enhancement area will be monitored and maintained by Pacific Ridge for five years, after which time it is presumed that the plantings will be well established. ® Community development code - Standards and Specifications for Riparian Area Management. (Appendix "M") This code includes provisions for wetland enhancement programs, non-native vegetation removal, and planting of native plant species, activities of which are included in this proposed project. Provisions A-F: A. All necessary and applicable permits required to perform the activities shall be obtained from other agencies including the Oregon Division of State Lands and Us Army Corps of Engineers. Response: Permits have been granted for this project by Oregon Division of State Lands and the US Army Corps of Engineers. B. All proposed activities shall comply with the regulations for wetlands and streams aaupted by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA). Response: This mitigation project does not allow material, construction debris, runoff, etc. to enter the creek, and therefore is not regulated by USA. The project is consistent with USA's enhancement goals for the Fanno Creek Watershed. C. The proposed activities shall be consistent with detailed management actions contained in the Fanno Creek Watershed Plan. Response: The proposed activities are consistent with the proposed riparian enhancement projects outlined in the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. The watershed plan summarizes the condition of the reach in the area of City Hall as follows (Table 12): bank/bed erosion - moderate percent native plants - 25 percent shade - 0-50 amount of woody debris - low habitat value - low overall condition - poor-fair. To improve the water quality, flood management, channel stability, and habitat, the plan specifically recommends planting native vegetation in the riparian corridor of this reach (Table 17B). By creating shrub/scrub wetlands and riparian woodlands through the planting of native shrub and tress species, this project will help meet the goals of the Watershed Plan. . Consistency with design recommendations included in the " Fanno Creek Park Master Plan". Included in the objectives of the Master Plan is "preservation of the natural habitat corridor". The Pacific Ridge project will not only preserve, but also enhance the natural habitat corridor. The Park Plan shows wooded areas within and near the boundaries of the enhancement project areas. The design of the enhancement areas include plantings of shrub-scrub and tree species. a Address any work expected on the city's part. Pacific Ridge will monitor and maintain the mitigation areas for 5 years after planting. Maintenance will include irrigation when needed, removal of weeds, and replacement of damaged and dead plantings. o Will proposed project adversely affect the trees located along the creek? The proposed mitigation areas are outside the areas where trees were recently planted. The mitigation areas are located where there are currently no trees growing. See enclosed aerial photograph. ® Response to park maintenance supervisor's comments. We agree with the supervisor's blackberry control methods. Pacific Ridge will be responsible for grubbing blackberries from the enhancement areas for a period of five years. Herbicides will not be used for controlling the blackberries. Please let me no if there is any further information the City Council may require for formal action on this proposal. I can be reached at 293-6150. Sincerely, ~ atricia U er t ' Community Aotion 503 648 4175 P.01 Agenda Item No. L eetl of (.0I az0q,, COMMUNITYACTION RGANIZATION 1001 SW Baseline St. o Hillsboro. OR a 97223 DAVE: -----~-p-f # of Pages (including cover sheet) FACSIMILE COVER SHEET 4pgq - -79,77 FAX -r • ATTENTION: COMPANY: FROM: 5 / MESSAGE: L42~/1_ - Iryou do not receive all or the pages or cannot react the pages please call (503) 648-6646. Thank you! Maim (503) 648-6646 0 Client Assistance (503) 648-0829 0 Fax (503) 648-4175 Community Action 303 648 4175 P.02 GOOMMUNITYACTION C)KGANIZATION 1001 SW Baseline St. a Hlllsboli OR a 97123 0 Main (503) 648.6646 0 Client Assistance (503) 648-0829 0 Fax (503) 648-4175 June 15, 1999 Jim Niccoli, Mayor City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mayor Niccoli, Please accept this letter as an addendum to Community Action Organization's 1999- 2000 request for Social Services funding from the City of Tigard. As you know, CAO has agreed to sponsor, in collaboration with Washington County and the East Washington County Shelter Partnership Council, the new homeless shelter in Tigard (formerly the RITE Center). We are requesting-that the City of Tigard grant us an additional $10,000-15,000 toward the costs of operating this vital community resource. CAO will be responsible for operating the shelter during its first year. The County is leasing the facility to CAO and will provide about half of this year's operating funds. The Shelter Partnership Council will form a non-profit organization to raise funds and assume responsibility in future years. The shelter will be run primarily with volunteer support, recruited by CAO and the Council. The support we receive from the City of Tigard continues to be invaluable in our efforts to provide services to the low-income residents of your City. We ask the City to continue this support to enable us to provide efficient and cost-effective services. Please call if you need any additional information. Thank you, and we look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Jerralynn Ness Executive Director /111 ot'Directr rs Dan All • Deena Barrett • Mayor Ralph Brown • Commissioner Tom Brian • Councilor Evelyn Buezinski • Kim C arlsun kla nr Rnh brake 9 Mtvgarel lilckniann Mayor Gordon Faber • Councillor Darlene Grecne 9 Richerd Hager • Cindy Hirst • Charlotte Karvia s C rain Finnic