City Council Packet - 07/08/1997
,,1
CITY OF TIGAMRD
®O
y ,
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
1
~ t
j MEETING
I
I
f
JULY 8, 1997
j
COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE
TELEVISED
r i
h\admtjolccplR7.doc ~
1 I
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
? i
t
106. L
1
E
~a
a CITY OF TIGARD
1 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
j BUSINESS MEETING
JULY 8,1997 6:30 P.M.
TIGARD CITY HALL
13125 SW HALL SLVD
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
f
PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the
appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the
Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be
two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting
i either the Mayor or the City Manager.
Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying
be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda
items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m.
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and
' should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the 1
Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD -
Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing
j impairments; and
i Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is
important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your -
need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone
i numbers as listed above: 639-4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD -
Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 8, 1997 - PAGE 1
I
i
Aft-
a
I ~ l
AGENDA
I
CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JULY 8, 1997
3 STUDY SESSION
I
> Executive Session: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to
i discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and
pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within
this session are confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may
be disclosed by those present. Representatives of the news media
are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any u.
information discussed during this session.
> Discussion: Water - Lake Oswego
1. BUSINESS MEETING
1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports
" 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please)
3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be j
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to.
3.1 Receive and File:
a. Council Calendar for July, 1997 through September, 1997
j b. Tentative Council Agenda
II C. Certificate of Appreciation - Tigard-Tualatin School District -
School to Career Activities
3.2 Initiate Vacation - Right-of-Way - SW Park Street - Resolution No. 97-
COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 8, 1997 - PAGE 2 j
i
i
. e --t.~
• Consent Agenda Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any
items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate
discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted
on those items which do not need discussion.
I
4. Review Options for Traffic Mitigation - SW North Dakota (carried over from
6117197 Council Meeting.)
City Engineer Gus Duenas
5. Vision Task Force Update - Presentation to John Williams
Assistant to City Manager Liz Newton and Risk Manager Loreen Mills
6. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
1
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive
y
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss
labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation
issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are
i confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those
3 present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this
session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this
session.
i
8. ADJOURNMENT
i iAadm\cathy\cca\970708p.d°c
i
i
~ f
a COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 8, 1997 - PAGE 3
Agenda Item No. I f
3 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL Meeting of
MEETING MINUTES -JULY 8, 1997
• STUDY SESSION
a > Meeting was called to order at 7:14 p.m. by Mayor Jim Nicoli
> Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli, Councilors Paul Hunt, Brian Moore, Bob Rohlf, and Ken . "
Scheckla. i
j > Staff Present: City Manager Bill Monahan; Asst. to the City Manager Liz Newton; Public
Works Director Ed Wegner; and City Recorder Catherine Wheatley.
> Executive Session: Cancelled Y,
> Balloon Festival Costs
Councilor Hunt expressed concern at the cost of the Balloon Festival as reported in the staff
memo. He asked for a Council discussion of the issue prior to meeting the Balloon Festival
organizers. He said that he did not see in the budget the authorization for an additional $41,000
! for the Festival. Mr. Monahan said that this cost was the cost of the City staff work and
services. Since they did not go over the budget for the year, they did not need a special
appropriations. He said that he was equally concerned at the dollar amount involved.
Councilor Hunt said that he would like to see an accounting of how much money the Festival
took in, and where it went. Mayor Nicoli concurred. Mr. Monahan suggested holding the
discussion soon, in late July or early August.
Mr. Monahan recommended discussing the philosophy behind the Balloon Festival and other
community events. He noted that the Balloon Festival organizers wanted to make contributions
{ to the park from their profits.
Councilor Hunt asked if these events should hire people to do the work rather than using City
staff. Mayor Nicoli pointed out that the City subsidized other community events such as -
Country Daze. However the Balloon Festival pulled in 70,000 people over three days.
Councilor Rohlf suggested doing an analysis of the economic benefit of the Festival to the local
merchants. Councilor Hunt concurred, arguing that if Washington Square benefited from the
I Festival, perhaps they should pay money in instead of the City using taxpayer dollars.
Councilor Scheckla mentioned the burden that this three day event put on the City staff. He
disagreed with the City picking up the extra $41,000 by itself, although he considered the event 47
to be great public relations for Tigard. Mayor Nicoli said that he did not disagree with others
helping with this extra cost but he advised caution in dealing with a volunteer organizatior that
put in hours of unpaid labor to organize this event.
Councilor Moore pointed out that sponsoring community events was part of what a city did as a
method of showcasing the city. The level of City funding given to an event was a benchmark of
how important that event was to the city.
t
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 8, 1997 - PAGE I
J
:F7
00) Mr. Monahan mentioned that staff has done a better job of tracking the dollars and thus had a
more accurate accounting of the costs involved with the Festival. He said that staff would
inform Bruce of the Council's concerns and ask him for input on how to offset the cost.
Ed Wegner, Public Works Director, reported that the staff worked in shifts 20 hours a day for
those three days. He noted the tremendous growth of the Festival since it began. He said that
1 staff wanted to work this community event. He mentioned that they did get paid overtime but in
addition the Festival people took care of them, providing food, etc.
~ i•
Mr. Monahan mentioned that one of the goals for community character in the visioning process
1
was what should be the City's role in community events. Liz Newton, Assistant to the City
Manager, commented that the Task Force wanted the Action Committee to look at events that
could eventually become self-supporting.
Mr. Monahan reiterated that this was a question of Council philosophy for which staff needed t. .
clear direction on in order to deal properly with requests for community events. Mayor Nicoli
commented that in his experience as a volunteer for community activities he found that raising
the funds needed to put on the activity was the downside. He said that he was not aware of any
event in this community that ever supported itself.
Mayor Nicoli said that he would not accept the visioning committee's recommendation unless
they had people on the committee who had experience in putting on a community event. He
said that community events and volunteerism were part of what made the city a good place to
live in.
Councilor Rohlf spoke for discussion on what the Council wanted to do to promote the City, to
make an investment in the City. He said that the Balloon Festival was an investment in the City. _
He commented that while the costs did surprise him, they did not "floor" him because he was
aware of how hard the staff was working to make this the excellent event that it was. Mr.
Wegner mentioned that staff was proud of their work on the Balloon Festival. 1
Councilor Hunt suggested more publicity for the Fourth of July as that was also an excellent
community event with many citizens in attendance.
> Agenda Review j'
> Mayor Nicoli recessed the study session at 7:35 p.m.
1. BUSINESS MEETING'
• Call to Order- City Council & Local Contract Review Board
r
Mayor Nicoli called the business meeting to order at 7:40 p.m.
Council Communications/Liaison Reports: None
• Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items: None
1
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 8, 1997 - PAGE 2 {
I
_A
> Presentation to John Williams
Ms. Newton reviewed the work John Williams contributed to the Vision Task Force as an intern. i
She expressed her and Loreen Mills' appreciation for his helpfulness in the process. On behalf t
j of the Council, Mayor Nicoli presented a plaque to Mr. Williams and thanked him for his work.
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA
Jack Polaris, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, King City, commented on the need for a
Corporate Commission in Oregon to hear citizen complaints about corporations.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
j Councilor Scheckla asked what would happen if ODOT decided not to vacate its right of way
(Item No. 3.2). Mr. Monahan said that staff was initiating the vacation process in the hopes that
ODOT would initiate their process concurrently. Staff could add a condition that the vacation
decision was pending on ODOT's similar decision.
Staff noted that the reference to Exhibit B in Section 1 should be corrected to Exhibit A.
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to adopt the Consent Agenda.
j
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors f
Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") {
3.1 Receive and File:
a. Council Calendar for July, 1997 through September, 1997
b. Tentative Council Agenda
C. Certificate of Appreciation - Tigard-Tualatin School District- School to Career i
j Activities
3.2 Initiate Vacation - Right of Way - SW Park Street - Resolution No. 97-28
4. REVIEW OPTIONS FOR TRAFFIC MITIGATION - SW NORTH DAKOTA (carried
over from 6/17/97 Council Meeting)
Gus Duenas, City Engineer, reviewed the findings of the staff report presented on June 17. He
j presented the background on the street connections in this area that resulted in the situation that
exists today. He said that the NPO 7 community plan (1970s) clearly showed SW North Dakota
a connecting to Springwood Drive but the Comprehensive Plan (1983) showed SW North Dakota
connecting to Scholls Ferry. He said that citizens did have ample opportunity for public input
during the year and a half Comprehensive Plan process. He presented aerial photographs from
1986 showing a connection to Scholls Ferry prior to development of the area. He concluded that
S those moving into the area knew that there was a connection to Scholls Ferry Road.
Mr. Duenas mentioned the island improvements placed in 1989 and 1991 to address the traffic
volume and speeding issues. He reviewed the five options from the JRH Transportation
.1 Engineering study conducted in between the two phases. In addition to the traffic islands, the
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 8, 1997 - PAGE 3
1 j
options either completely closed SW North Dakota or partially closed it. The problem was that
any kind of closure on SW North Dakota rerouted the traffic to neighborhood streets not I
designed to carry the traffic.
Mr. Duenas recommended creating a 10 person task force to review these and any other options s.
in depth for a recommendation back to Council. The task force should include neighbors from
Springwood Court as well as North Dakota, businesses impacted by traffic changes in the area,
City staff, and a Councilor. He suggested that Council provide direction on what alternatives
were not acceptable, such as closure of SW North Dakota.
Mr. Duenas pointed out that North Dakota was a minor collector in the Comprehensive Plan,
and any substantial changes to it required an amendment. He said that this was not a unique
situation, other minor collectors in the City intersected with arterials. He commented that the
discussion on this situation would possibly have ramifications elsewhere in the City.
i
S
? Mayor Nicoli suggested using the same process that the City used for the tree issue and 130`h.
3 The City created a task force chaired by a Councilor and gave them free rein to find a solution
that everyone could live with. He commented that a staff member or Councilor knew that a ,
street closure was not an acceptable solution to the problem. He recommended Councilor Rohlf
1 as the chair of this Task Force. Councilor Rohlf requested Liz Newton as a staff facilitator.
i
Councilor Rohlf spoke to the engineering report. He stated that the North Dakota neighborhood
did not intend to divert traffic to another neighborhood. At the time the study was done, the
options given were viable. He commented that the aerial photograph could not be from March
j 1986 because he moved into his residence in October 1986 and North Dakota was not yet -
1 connected to Scholls Ferry. He said that he was willing to serve on the task force.
The Council agreed by consensus to direct staff to create a task force with Councilor Rohlf as
the chair.
1
> Jack Polans reiterated his suggestion from last week that the City take aerial film of the traffic
flow along that road. Mayor Nicoli reiterated his answer that the City could not afford to do
that. He mentioned that aerial film of traffic flows was not a method used for traffic analysis. t
Traffic engineers have found better methods for gathering data to resolve problems. Councilor
1 Moore suggested that Mr. Polaris meet with Mr. Duenas on the City's current traffic analysis
equipment.
> Jackie Glen, 12500 SW North Dakota, explained that she was given the vacant lot next to her
house. She asked if the City would plant trees on it for the benefit of those driving by.
! > Rob Hansen said that he would like to learn the terminology used in discussing traffic, such as
how much traffic volume was a minor collector designed to carry. Mayor Nicoli suggested that
Mr. Hansen attend the task force meetings, as they would be open to the public. Staff would
present appropriate background information at the meetings.
> Joe Afrangi, 12470 SW North Dakota, spoke for a speedy process. He said that he did not
want this to drag on because the lives of families were at stake. He invited the Council to back
out of his driveway at 7:30 a.m. in order to gain an appreciation of what really went on. f
f
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 8, 1997 - PAGE 4 €
E:
t
i
Francisco E. Lopez, 12560 SW Summererest Drive, volunteered for the Task Force as a
i
f resident in the area.
5. VISION TASK FORCE UPDATE
1
i Ms. Newton reported that at the last Vision Task Force meeting, they met with the leaders of the t
Action Committees to present the individual target areas and goals. They have finished the year `
under budget and on schedule.
Loreen Mills, Administrative Risk Analyst, explained that the Action Committees were
composed of City staff, technical people from ODOT, school resource people, parks &
recreation people, and others to represent the variety of viewpoints. Each committee had
between 12 to 15 members. She reviewed the Action Committee process to develop an action
plan to achieve the direction set by the Task Force. She mentioned the first public report in
January 1998. Ms. Newton pointed out that each Committee would be structured differently to
accommodate the particular issue under discussion.
j Ms. Newton projected that the Committees would finish up in September. Councilor Rohlf
t expressed concern about timeliness, citing the grant process. Ms. Newton explained that the
Committees were developing strategies, not necessarily taking action. Ms. Mills pointed out
that some actions could take three to four years to implement, others a couple of months.
1
a Councilor Scheckla asked for clarification on the process. Ms. Newton said that staff served as
resource people only with the Committee members themselves generating ideas and strategies.
She said that staff would inform the Committees if a suggested strategy had legal obstacles but
pointed out that the Committee might decide to change the law. Staff's intent was to provide f
enough information to allow the Committee to make a good decision. o
d
a 6. NON AGENDA ITEMS
l:
7. ADJOURNMENT: 8:26 p.m. f
n z((k)
,Cc E /n om'
3 Y
Att t Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder
{
x4r y^iii- ~
/ Mayor, City of Tigard
Date: r-)
i:\adm\ca1hy\ccm\970708. m
i '
~ v
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 8, 1997 - PAGE 5
T
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice TT 8 8 7 6
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
F 9 Legal Notice Advertising RECEIVED
• City of Tigard ❑ Tearsheet Notice JUL p 9 1997
13125 SI9 Hall Blvd.
° Ti-gard,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit CITY OF TIGARD
7 •Accounts Payable •
i
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON, )as.
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. J I,,
ti uA~v .Gnyaer - - "
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of them; 2a rd-Tua 1 a in Pi.mes
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at___ raard_ in the r i
aforesaid county and state; that the • ;
City ~>1~i1 Business tfeetin4
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for_MIE successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
Ju_l_3 , 19 9 7
q '
Subscribed and sworn to fore me this 3rd d of Jul, 1997
OFFICIAL SEAL
7 ROBIN A. BURGESS
Notaryblic for Oregon NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
My Commission Expires: COMMISSION NO. 062071
MV COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16, 2001
AFFIDAVIT
The following meeting highlights are published for your information. Full
agendas may be obtained from the City Recorder, 13125 S.W. Hall
Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639-4171.
a CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
TIGARD CITY HALL-TOWN HALL
13125 S.W. HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON
JULY 8,1997
i
Study Meeting (Red Rock Creek Room) (6:30 P.M.)
• Executive Session
Water Issues
Business Meeting (Town Hall) (7:30 P.M.)
• SW North Dakota Mitigation Optior. Review
• Vision Task Force - Update and Presentation
• Initiate Vacation - Right-of-Way - SW Park Street
TT8876- Publish July 3, 1997.
i
-J
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 -VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE : July 8.1997 16
f (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
3
y lease sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from
ou on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns
4 through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
j STAFF
NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC CONTACTED
dF-i
'1 k
i
I
i
1
19admgoWlsltshtdo 4
f'
i
I
yl- L~
vA MC). y
~nr~ .~1~~~ }mss
/~'G ~ ~ L ~f.J t2"D .~Y/s 94 tP'P l~( ~ , C (~r~~ ~ ~
i
i
k
~I
J
Council Agenda Item 3.
For Agenda of 'f
MEMORANDUM 1
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
~ I
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bill Monahan, City Administrator
DATE: July 8, 1997 -
SUBJECT: COUNCIL CALENDAR, July through September, 1997
1 ,
Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk If
generally OK, we can proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly
Council Calendars.
July
4 Fri 4th of July Holiday - City Offices Closed
* 8 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Study Session
Business Meeting
*15 Tues Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
*22 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
j Study Session
3 Business Meeting
1
A ust
*12 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Study Session
Business Meeting
*19 Tues Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) j
*26 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Study Session
j Business Meeting
September j .
I Felon lAbor Day -City Offices Closed
* 9 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Study Session
Business Meeting
*16 Tues Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
*23 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Study Session
Business Meeting
30 Tues Special Goal Setting Council Meeting - (6:50 p.m.)
. 1Aadm\cathy\counc11\ccca1.doc
1
i' Tigard Counc: entative Agenda
7115/97-Workshop 7122/1997-Businesss 8112/1997-Businesss 8119197-Workshop
7/8/1997-Businesss Study Session
Study Session
Study Session
Attalati
Water - Lake Oswego
Presentations Presentations
Presentations
l11 it ollsell Bell a
o1ISl'll g ,
case" gen a Metro 2010 Update
initiate vacation-Park St.
(resolution)
Business Meeting Workshop Topics
workshop Topics Business Meeting p y date
Business Meeting Franchise Agreement Hrg. Wireless Comm. Annexation olic up
SW North Dakota SWETF - Report (I hr.) r ordinances) Hr g: Park St. vacation
Traffic Mit. options Ins. Update - R. Gra beat Atfalati-adopt agree
Vision Task Force Basketball Hoops
Update and present.
Initiate Vacation-SWPark mm . m
C
o
Council Goal Council Goal 3
Coum:il Goal Council Goal -4 oZ
Council Goat Goal Update 00
tT-`
Page I
f
Agenda Item No __4d_
Meeting of
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: City Council
~
FROM: Diane M. Jelderks
DATE: June 23, 1997
i
SUBJECT: Certificate of Appreciation
i
Attached is a Certificate of Appreciation for participating in Tigard-Tualatin School District School j
to Career Activities. This last year I had three students who choose to spend time at the City of
Tigard.
Beside providing an opportunity for students to team what type of work opportunities are available,
they also learn about how local government works. I look forward to continuing this program next
school year.
A~
H ~
pucwim
C,
r-JSc S
1996-1997
~
✓Ylauy 7997
L~
AGENDA ITEM # A
For Agenda of 1 /9Z 7
l CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T7-
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Initiation of Vacation Proceedings for approximately 4.172 square feet of public right-
of-way Highway, south of SW Park . tre ajiqccn~ to Tigard Marketplace,
PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK I t1~1~
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Should the City Council initiate vacation proceedings involving approximately 4,172 square feet of public right-of-
way adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, south of SW Park Street and adjacent to Tigard Marketplace? h .
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1
It is recommended that Council initiate vacation proceedings by adopting the attached resolution.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
i
In the City vacation process of streets, easements, and other public dedicated areas, the City Council may begin the
~Yocess by passing a resolution to schedule a public hearing to consider such requests.
Michael Magnus, representing Pacific Corp., is requesting that the City Council initiate vacation proceedings for
approximately 4,172 square feet of public right-of-way adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, south of SW Park Street
and adjacent to Tigard Marketplace. In 1986, a street vacation (Ordinance 86-19) was approved to vacate a
portion of a frontage road along SW Pacific Highway, to facilitate a commercial development planned for the area. '
In 1987, a Site Development Review (SDR 87-15) was approved to allow the construction of a 153,180 square foot
retail center, commonly known as Tigard Marketplace. Since the 1986 street vacation only vacated a portion of the
frontage road right-of-way, a portion of the right-of-way remained. Within that right-of-way is a landscaped area
that is adjacent to the access road leading into the Tigard Marketplace center. The landscape area supplements the
t landscaping of the center and is maintained by the center. The petitioner is requesting that the City of Tigard
a initiate vacation proceedings to vacate a portion of the remaining frontage road right-of-way. This portion of the
right-of-way contains the landscape island. The landscape island contains approximately 8,617 square feet.
j Approximately 4,172 square feet is owned by the City of Tigard and approximately 4,445 square feet is owned by
y the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The petitioner has contacted ODOT to begin the ODOT
4 vacation procedure. The City will be contacting and coordinating with ODOT through the City's request for I
a comments process. There is a potential issue if ODOT does not vacate their portion of the right-of-way. The City
will need to evaluate the vacation decision based upon the outcome of the ODOT vacation process.
7
1 Appropriate agencies shall be contacted for comments, prior to developing a report for Council consideration.
.1
i \city%vidcVum\vacigmktsum !
7 t,
S'.
Attachments: Exhibit A - (site plan) Exhibit C -(SDR 87-15)
Exhibit B - (Ordinance 86-19) Exhibit D - (vicinity map)
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Take no action at this time.
FISCAL NOTES
All fees have been paid by the applicant
d.
I
is%ci"idc\sum\vnctgmkt.sum !(4F[ i.. {
t l
a
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGIM
C ORDINANCE NO. 86-
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE 99W FRONTAGE ROAD IN THE VICINITY OF
PARK STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. .
1 WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to
;i Section 15.08.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code; and
.fi WHEREAS, the reason and purpose for this vacation is to return a portion of
` the frontage road along 99W in the vicinity of Park Street to the adjacent "
property owners to facilitate a commercial development planned for the area;
and k
A WHEREAS, the vacation is recommended by the Planning Commission and the City "
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with ORS 271.100, and TMC Section 15.08.110, the
Council fixed a time and place for the public hearing and the Recorder
published notice and posted notice in the area to be vacated; and
WHEREAS, notice has been mailed ~o all property owners abutting said vacation
area and all owners in the affected area, as described in ORS 271.080; and
WHEREAS, the Council, having held a hearing on April 14, 1985, finds the
public interest will not be prejudiced by the vacation as provided by ORS
271.120 and TMC Section 15.08.130; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is in the public interest to ipprove the
request to vacate a portion of the 99W frontage road in the vicinity of Park - "
Street because the public interest will not be prejudiced; and j
WHEREAS, the Council finds that the following condition is necessary to vacate
said land:
The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of
Z this ordinance and it shall not be effective until a cert;Fied
' copy of this ordinance has boon recorded with the Wash.ngto"
County Clerk, Assessor, and Surveyor,
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Tigard City Council hereby orders the vacation of that portion
i of the frontage road along 99W in the vicinity of Park Street as described on
the attached Exhibit "A" and shown on the attached Exhibit "8", and by this
reference made parts hereof.
Section 2: Tho Tigard City Council further orders that the vacation be
; subject to the following condition:
aj
ORDINANCE W. 96-J9
Page I
Iw/375OA
3
t
t &
=a
i'
>'r
The vacation shall noL be effective until the effective date of this
;k ordinance and it shall riot be affective until a certified copy of
C this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk,
Assessor, and Surveyor.
Section 3: In no situation shall this ordinance be effective until the 31st
day after its enactment by the City Council and approval by the Mayor.
PASSED: By n1 Ly)IYY),;L~S vote of all Council members present after
being rr,ad by number and title only, this Th day
of 1986.
r ' 1 b '
I a.reen R. Wilson, Deputy Recorder
APPROVED: This day of 1 1986.
ohn'E. Cook, Mayor
Y
7
a
.c
ORDINANCE No. 86-j
' Pago 2
Ir/3750A
i
I
J
I
~f
EXHIBIT "A"
'.1
Mercury Development
i Street Vacation (Taylors Bridge Rd. - C.R. 477)
Project No. 273-01-85
February 25, 1986
;i
3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
j
A tract of land situate in the S.W. 1/4, Section 2, T.2S., R.1W.,
W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more
particularly described as follows:
1
Beginning at 5/8" I.R. on the southe4sterly right-of-way line of e
Pacific Highway (Hwy 99) at Engineer's Station 133+90.79, said
point being 40.0 feet, when measured at right angles, from the
centerline of said Pacific Highway, and being South 39°42'32"
West, 70.74 feet from the northwest corner of that tract of land
described in Book 831, Page 415, Washington County deed records;
thence, along the southeasterly right-of-way line of said Pacific
Highway, North 34023138" East, 70.66 feet to a point on the
northwesterly projection of the southwesterly line of that tract
of land as conveyed to Southwest Church of Christ, recorded in
Book 1013, Page 402, Washington County deed records, and the true
i point of beginning;
thence, continuing along said southeasterly right-of--way, North 1
34°23138' East, 577.06 feet to a point of intersection with the
northwesterly right-of-way line of Tayloru Bridge Rd. (C.R. 477),
being 60 feet in width;
thence, along the northwesterly right-o£-way line of said Taylors
Bridge Rd. (C.R. 477), North 39°42132" East, 303.44 feet to a
point on the northwesterly projection of the southwesterly line
of that tract of land as conveyed to Roland and Mary Ingalls,
?T recorded in Book 270, Page 455, Washington County deed records;
thence, along said northwesterly projection of the southwe-_t:rly
line of said Ingalls tract, South 50°28'48" East, 60.00 fee, to a
Foint on the southeasterly right-of-way line of said T •''ors
Bridge Rd. (C.R. 477);
thence, along said southeasterly right-of-way line of Taylors
Bridge Rd., South 39°42'32' West, 877.85 feet to a point on the
southwesterly line of said Southwest Church of Christ tract;
thence, along the northwesterly projection of the southwesterly
line of said Southwest Church of Christ tract, North 53138152"
West, 6.56 feet to the true point of beginning.
Contains 37,329 square feet.
ORDINANCE NO. 86-
I
i
~ ~ ; I
i j
fi _ o _ ~ ~ _ -
3 a a m aN =
O ~Zr ~ N _ + ~ ~ - u..1~..,.
1 l~ N~ h W ~ - 1 y ~
< AK _ i__ ~J 3 ~ ~ _ - -
, _
~~Q I (fir Y
0 8 E d _ a N Q ~ 8 N r7 ~ I .m v-
1Y ~ N Q Q9 ,rj po ~ d' J I(+ _
V ~t NY ~ ~ F A t-~ - - I U) T e ~9 F r- L - n ~ I a 3~ s
_ ~
a
' ~ ~ gnu ~ ~ / z = - ~
- ~ 90005 - ' •'m•"~` o' a
_ .g - _ i - ~ S 3,Bti tiz.q~- N_. i
S M bb Sfl }.MH 71d1~Vo M i i •I N _ I.N I R II ~ ~
.i'.• d N. ~ ~ f o ~ r~'i 't .
LL. j/v",
~~~Jri i ;y
OftDIN~1NCE N0. 86- C .c:`' 7 ~
~_-._T
h ~
~ sw,
Y' E P' , . :.~..:..:..a...
' If this notice appaarg clearer than the ~ = .
{ AUG 2 41998 ;document, the document is of marginal qustiity. ; MICROFILMED
I,, --~tt , ~1 s1r, -
i ~t x _ a s ~ 7o u u tr u ~s , u a se -~r ~ _ ' ~ . lIl#I~I~III#I(4lllllllllllldti#Ilfii~llfllf[ll l#I#I#Ill~l(1#~#[fIII#III~II##II(IIIIIII(illll~l #I[d1111I1#IIIIIIII###ft111111[#Ilfll#I#Il~llll(GIIU#l~Ullll#11711[IIINII##Ifhll#I(li#l #fll ~ lllll~#~lllt(Ill~#~ (~llllllll I; .
_ ~ x H N
.:Pf ~ R !g PERK
_ , - - - -
-
_ `a SIGNAL d
5' IILL LAN! . B WIDG 91DQWALK'
....",_el,C _LALIDSCArINC! oLJ'
1 ~ • 24 ~ tQ ~ I
~ i • ~ ~
. s"'.' _ loc ~ I
RI bIK P A! K
• F. N • ~ I
• STp.TlSTI~`~ ~ I
g LAND ARFA 12.2 Ai s 531,418 SFt
1 Rls'i'O LANOtjGAPIN(s 7R, 232 J LAFJrJ,'~"AI'Ir,;, ~ ~~~:vin'r~~ 84, lo5~n
IZ
~4 4 GROG8t2y 40i761 ~ 1200 • 2.04 -
_ DRUCti 5 30! 600 ~ ~ 400 • 77 j
SHOPS t7, 275 / 400 = 43 m ro PADS 8,944 aoo ~ 1't
r~ RES"CAt~Rp•rfT s~rooo / l00 ~ ~ s6 I ~ _
N ~ FUTURE LEASH. SO 000 ~ 40p s tZ0 I'S3 I8o Sti -082 SPAGf:S Rt°1~hD ":.._FU•TuRE LEAStr - ~ tlJ ~ ~b9 srAG>`5 P(ZpV1DCp _
:'_=50, oao S F - • 25~ 5' 3.b ~ 1000 SF G f3A G. P
` • ~ I ~'i•'< I ~ oil I
o I
~ to t2 : i ~ v-• i
V) ~;y/~ ~ ~ ,
~ Y a ~ _ p
I, .
J' `J ~ fs
a 07106!97 4 , ~ ✓'y{ I Agen ~ ~ '~.I
• 1 , ~ 2 of 2 ~ ~+'.,,y,.. - 12ISIicG ~ ,..,,r~,
(2AGK ~ '1
_ . ~ _ - I a
" If this notice Hppz;irs-clearer :h:In the AUG 2 41995 document, the docum~n. is of marginnl~,uliih' ~ MICROFILMED • ~ a t
_ - ~ ~ ~ ; {
INCHMACE HI CH y - - i ~*•t r a _ = • _ , - tt- tt w ~xs , If to ~ l~lllll nGlltt ~ >tiI11Uill ~
llul~uuhli~i<mh~uluidluliiit~tlilfitl uulul lul~ld(ll(~iudli((ll(Il~ui(IIi[Guild(Iluullluhul~llnllnlhu~illlliiu~luplul~ulilulumullllliillilil~~1~ iii imam im►uil pt~ u • ,
- • ! ; ,
-71
? CITY OF TIGARD'~' C
NOTICE OF DECISION
SDR 87-15
PORTLAND FIXTURE
APPLICATION: A request by Portland Fixture Limited Partnership for approval of a
153,180 square foot retail center and related facilities on property zoned C-G
(Commercial General) and located on the southeast side of Pacific Highway 700 feet
S south of SW Garrett Street (WCTM 2S1 2CC tax lot 100, 200, 500, 800, 801, 900 and
901).
DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard
has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and
conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below.
1
A. FINDING OF FACT
j
=4 1. Background r
i In 1982 the Tigard City Council approved a revision (Resolution q82-132) to
the NPO pl Comprehensive Plan and a Zone Change for these properties from
Commercial Professional/General Commercial to General Commercial (CPR
4-82/ZC 18-82). This change was approved subject to several conditions.
Three Sensitive Lands permits have been granted by the Hearings Officer
from this property. M 3-02 and SL 6-85 approvals were valid for one year
but each expired before land alteration was done. The decision for the
third approval, SL 87-08, was granted recently and will expire June 23,
1988 if not acted upon. l
{ i
A Site Development Review (SDR 8-06) was submitted in March, 1986 for
{ approval of a 157,000 square foot retail center and related facilities.
Approval with conditions was granted in April, 1986 but expired after one
year.
2. Vicinity Information
The property is adjacent to Pacific Highway along the northwestern frontage
j and properties zoned C-G lie on the opposite side of the street. Other
parcels zoned C-G are situated immediately to the northeast and southwest
along Pacific Highway. The area to the east and south is committed to E
! single family and multiple family residences. The homes to the east and
southeast are zoned R-4.5 (Single Family Residential, 4.5 units per acre)
q and R-3.5 (Single Family Residential, 3.5 units per acre) respectively and
the apartlurfls along the remainder of the southern boundary are
71
non-conforming units which are zoned C-G.
3. Site Information and Proposal Description
The subject properties are presently undeveloped except for one 4,644
square foot retail building. A drainageway slopes downhill toward the
s southern end of the parcel.
The applicants are proposing to develop the properties with a 153,180
square foot shopping center called Tigard East. It is intended that the
j center will contain a grocery store, drug store, restaurant and assorted
shops.
i
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 87-15 - PORTLAND FIXTURE - PAGE 1 k
MEOW
7771
I The site plans submitted for this project are similar to SDR 8-86 regarding
building placement and site design. There has been a reduction in the
total building floor area and adjustments have been made in placing fewer
Z loading and trash areas in the rear of the
pick-up property near
a residential areas.
_a
4. Agency and NPO Comments
The State Highway Division has reviewed this proposal and state that they
:y are familiar with this development since they have reviewed it several
times. The present proposal appears fine to them.
The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District has considered the proposal and
has responded that any new traffic signal to be installed must be equipped
with opticom controls. They are somewhat concerned that this size of
development could cause the 3000 gpm fire flow requirement to be exceeded.
It is required that an automatic sprinkler protection system be
incorporated into all buildings in this development.
3 NPO ql considered the proposal and has offered the following
recommendations:
1. Fencing should be solid wood (with no gaps) or made of concrete or
brick and 8 feet high.
2. There should be adequate sound deflection of heat/air conditioning
systems. _
oil% 3. Truck traffic in rear of buildings should be limited in their time of
operation.
The Engineering Division has provided the following findings: _
1. Notice of Final Order SL 87-08 became final on July 6, 1987.
j
4 2. Site Development Review SDR 08-86 expired on April 21, 1987.
3. The proposed development fronts State of Oregon right-of-way, namely -
i SW Pacific Highway; a frontage road exists therealong.
4. An existing City 8" sanitary sewerage main-line facility and storm C
drainageway traverses applicant's site, both draining generally
northeasterly. f -
a
5. The applicant proposes to develop a retail shopping center with two
primary (signalized) access points and one right in - right out minor
! access point. The applicant further proposes to realign the existing
public sanitary sewerage line and install a closed conduit storm sewer
line, traversing the site, to enhance public operation and maintenance
thereof while facilitating site structure layout.
6. Further, the applicant has acknowledged awareness of the need for (and
is already participating in) action to vacate a portion of public
roadway running "through" the property, to improve the portion of
roadway running from the property to SW Park Street intersection
a
33 3
;i NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 87-15 - PORTLAND FIXTURE - PAGE 2
L~
L.~
(providing access to adjacent tracts), to acquire fronting surplus
property from the State, to landscape the frontage, to modify an
existing traffic signal and add a new traffic signal, in an endeavor to
3 develop the site.
j The Building Division, Portland General Electric and the Tigard Water
! District all reviewed this proposal and have no objections to it.
No other comments were received concerning this proposal..
1
i B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
The proposed project is consistent with Community Development Code provisions
pertaining to vehicular access, building setbacks, lot coverage, visual
clearance and parking. The following topics warrant further discussion
regarding conformance with Code requirements.
1. Landscaping and Buffering
The minimum landscaping requirement for developed properties in the C-G
zone is 15%. According to the- Site Plan and Planting Plan provided by
the applicants, this minimum requirement will be met. These plans
indicate that a 15 foot wide buffer strip wi'il be provided along all
properties that are residentially zoned.
j As noted in the staff report SDR 8-86 concern remains whether the
ii proposed fence will adequately deal with the potential for adverse I,
A noise impacts. The Site Plan indicates three loading and/or trash
collection areas which are to be located behind the proposed buildings -
and along the rear property lines. Although this number has been
3 reduced from six such locations proposed in SDR 8-86, the potential for
adverse noise impacts have not necessarily been reduced. NPO ql
/j suggested in SDR 8-86 that the fence should include wooden slats and
1f that no loading or trash pick-up should occur prior to 7 AM.
I As proposed, the screening, buffering and fencing will have minimal r-
effect relating to sound deflection or absorption. To better serve the
intent of the Code to minimize commercial impacts spilling into
residential areas and consistent with a condition of approval stated in
a SDR 8-86, it is recommended that a 8 foot high fence or masonry wall be
situated along all residentially zoned !
parcels. In addition, a loading
and delivery curfew between the hours of 10 PM and 6 AM should be
observed.
2. Noise
'j
a A second noise issue unrelated to the mitigation of loading and trash
1 collection impacts concerns the heating, ventilation, air and cooling
(HVAC) units to be used in heating and cooling the buildings. The Site
Plan has identified the proposed siting of various structures on the
property but details are lacking with regard to HVAC unit placements on
Y the buildings. Since HVAC units are sources of potentially constant
and incessant noise, sound mitigation controls (such as enclosures)
should be located around these units to diminish impacts on nearby
residents.
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 87-15 - PORTLAND FIXTURE - PAGE 3
L~
3. Trees
SDR 8-86 had proposed 592 parking spaces while the current proposal
provides 589. Based upon the number of parking spaces in a
development, one tree for every seven spaces must be planted in or near
+ the parking area. Because the original landscaping plan showed
approximately 60 trees when 85 trees were required, once again staff
would like to review this aspect of the plan since the present
landscaping plan is almost identical to the original.
4. Signage
i
a
No plans for signage were submitted with this application although SDR
8-86 addressed allowable signage previously. The shopping center
1 complex is entitled to one multi-faced, free-standing sign.
j Contact with the applicant revealed the desire to be considered for an
increase in sign area of 50% as permitted in the Community Development
Code when such a request is made during the Site Development Review i."
process. This amount of increase allows sufficient sign area to
advertise the various tenants in a new development. An increase in
height of 25% may also be gained when the " . sign's visual appeal and
overall design quality would be served..."
It is expected that the shopping center will have at least six tenants
{ and perhaps as many as ten or twelve. Therefore, staff supports
justification for an increase in sign size. Since no sign designs and
plans were submitted and since the applicant provides no reasons for an
increase in sign height, staff finds no justification for permitting an -
increase in height.
1
C. DECISION f
The Planning Director approves SDR 87-15 subject to the following conditions: '
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
! BUILDING PERMITS.
2. The design and configuration of improvements impacting SW Pacific Highway
including accessways and signalization, shall be reviewed and approved by
the City of Tigard and Oregon Department of Transportation. A Road
Approach Permit from O.D.O.T. and a City-0.D.O.T.-Applicant signalization f
agreement is required prior to commencement of street improvement work.
-
3. Street improvements including lighting. sidewalk, riirb, dri_ u_ay approach,
road base and surfacing, traffic and pedestrian controls including
signalization, signing and pavement marking, closed conduit storm drainage
and sanitary sewerage facilities and, also, general utilities, shall be
1 installed by the applicant in conformance with City and State requirements
1 and standards and specifications.
4. All documents relevant to the improvement (dedication, easement, etc.,)
A shall be on City and State forms; and shall be reviewed and approved
thereby prior to recording. A complete copy of the State Road Approach
Permit shall be provided to the City.
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 87-15 - PORTLAND FIXTURE - PAGE 4 Y
__d
5. Joint use and maintenance agreements for common driveways shall be provided {
by the applicant to the City for approval and shall be referenced on and
become part of all applicable parcel Deeds.
Ago&
6. The final conditions of SL 87-08 shall be considered a part hereof as
i though inscribed herein in full.
7. The center shall be entitled to one free-standing sign that does not exceed
the allowable sign area by over 50 percent.
8. No deliveries or trash pick-up shall occur at the rear of the project
between the hours of 10 PM and 6 AM.
a 9. A. solid wood fence or masonry wall which is 8 feet in height shall be
i installed along the property line where the subject property abuts the
2 R-3.5 and R-4.5 zoning districts. Said fence shall be constructed prior to
it the issuance of building permits, f
10. The location and method for noise reduction for the HVAC systems shall be q '
3 approved by the Planning Director.
-i
11. The landscaping plan shall be revised to meet Code requirements for trees
{ within parking areas.
i' 12. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision
?.j date noted below.
D. PROCEDURE
f 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and
mailed to:
XX The applicant 6 owners
1 XX Owners of record within the required distance
XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization
XX Affected governmental agencies
2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON UNLESS
AN APPEAL IS FILED.
3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance
with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community
Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with
the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent.
3 The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M. v m7.
4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard
Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., PO Box 23397,
Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171.
_ tj ~ 7 Z/-87
%,,,REPARE oommDDi~xon, R is nt P ner DATE
-:3 7 vim/
William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE OPPROVED
j (TD:cn/0107D)
NOTICE OF DECISION - SOR 87-15 - PORTLAND FIXTURE - PAGE 5
• ~1
t
L'-4 ZJ
i
R ~
rr~ J1;I =I M- -
C s± live G
51-
;J 1 L~r ` y~ • 4
i J
T ~
. j
77]
\ ~9
IA t VACANT
VACANT
G RZTAIL A"LIANCE LOT ❑ LOT bAS F
m 3TORES REPAIR STATION
- - - - - - - - - - - - - PACIFIC HIGHWA`f WESTs _ - - r - - - -
APT'S VACANT -
STORE EAIU) FR ONTALE
0. PAIR ROAD
i. J I -1 m
I•
®rA 0-15ARDER ~ PROPOSED SHOP
DEVELOPMENT n~
"I BOUNDARY n +n
~ A Z is G+70
0 7D z m
p~ o Z rv
D Z
Z rr
cn _p r m
~ o
Z
- cn
- PARK STREET /
EXISTING / ,OR~ f
TRAFFIC SIGNAL q~`
C
a's
i
A.
h /
' PROPOSED
TRAFFIC SIGNAL.
IL-C
~
e
FSS
ti
Y
a \ • 9CCF ~ aJ
SITE PLAIN
IGARD EAST _
NO SCALE _ j
:i -13-
°j
QP. \ G ww ~
U~rJ-
45``
_ Nr oa+ r w 3 ~1 d i° fr VUF'ua-'`_ Nr "S r w+
i
+ ~z$ G~ ~ ~ a F~~~~8~ 1 r G 8 k ~ Jryg1'.t ~~1 F ~ w ~ t b
-SU
NV 6 •t r
x Y f ,w5iw"• ~ ~ 4~ t C v- L 1~r ~ :7 1
u co
- - C ~ •O bQ q G y,.~n ~ 6 ~+'J M ~ y,~ ~c ~ Q ~~c'+ ~ Y C
\ ccl q 4' y \ w a 4S a 1 ~r ~~n~
•.3 ~ a > 1?..i1,E l(f✓IJ t i~r ~ ~a111~~~JLL~~~~--- Y'i4L'i~ 5~u'~'
7 u i •nrwcc ~
wlw• -
u _ +
_ .
Agenda item No--
Meetin _ .7~
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
i
TO: City Council
City Manager
FRONt: Gus Duenas%-'J
City Engineer
.:t
DATE: July 2, 1997 i
t SUBJECT: SW North Dakota Street Progress Report
f
I~
I presented the findings of the speed study performed in February 1997 during the City Council
Study Session on June 17, 1997. The study focused on SW North Dakota between 121st Avenue
j and Springwood Drive. The results of the study indicated that 85th percentile speeds on that
street had remained relatively constant at approximately 4 miles per hour over the posted speed
limit during the past few years. Based on the study, the traffic islands installed on SW North
1 Dakota are effective at reducing traffic speeds. The initial 85th percentile speed of 35 mph in
9 1990 was reduced to 29 mph after installation of the islands. This is a reduction in speed of 6 _
mph, which is typically achieved by speed humps.
l Despite the results of the study, we realize that there are still serious problems with speeding and
volume of traffic on that street. Many of the residents are not happy with the traffic islands and
stated during the study session that the islands introduced more problems than they solved. The
existing islands were not all installed at the same time. The rectangular islands were placed in
1 1989. Because of continuing complaints, numerous options to resolve the problems were
examined after the installation of the islands in 1989. As a result, the circular islands were added
to the street in 1991.
Council members expressed a strong interest in reviewing the options proposed at that time with
the intention of further discussing what actions need to be taken to resolve the problems on that
street. The input of the residents during study session on June 17th is that the street is serving as
a hyrycc for rPainnal tryffc. The trwiffc volumes are slightly higher than that expected for a -
minor collector. The curvature of the street as it proceeds from 121st Avenue to Scholls Ferry
Road is such that at least one resident on the inside part of the curve cannot safely back out into
the street from the driveway. In addition, there was a contention that a previous master plan had
not shown North Dakota connecting to Scholls Ferry Road, but that a change to allow that
connection was made later without due notice.
j Council scheduled further discussion on SW North Dakota to continue on July 8, 1997 and
a
i directed that residents of SW North Dakota, to include the residents along Anton Drive, be given
`3 I
i
• L~
l+
1 notice.of the scheduled discussion. Attached as Appendix A is a copy of the notice prepared and
a list of the residents of the area, including Anton Drive, that were seat these notices. The notices
were mailed out on July 1, 1997.
The following sequence of events that led to the development of SW North Dakota as it is today
is presented as background information, together with the options that were considered in 1990
for resolving the problems on that street:
Background
I
Prior to the development of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Tigard used the
Neighborhood Planning Organization system. That segment of SW North Dakota Street was in
:j the NPO #7 Community Plan. The major problem with the NPO system was that the various
i NPO areas developed independent plans that were not coordinated citywide. NPO #7 clearly
1 intended SW North Dakota to connect to Springwood Drive, which was to connect to 121st "
I Avenue. The City's Comprehensive Plan superseded the NPO #7 Plan in 1983. Development of
the adopted plan took at least a year and a half and there was ample opportunity for residents to
comment on the plan at that time. The Comprehensive Plan recognized that the lack of developed
areas west of 121 st Street required development of a number of collector street connections. One
j of the collector streets clearly identified for connection to Scholls Ferry is the extension of North
Dakota Street west of 121st Avenue to Scholls Ferry Road. The detailed information regarding
NPO #7 and the City's 1983 Comprehensive Plan is attached as Appendix B.
An aerial photograph of that area in September 1984 showed an orchard west of 121st. Another I "
aerial photograph in March 1986 showed SW North Dakota already constructed with a few
houses in the three cul-de-sacs north of that street. The apartment complex was just newly
j constructed eliminating any future extension of Springwood Drive through that lot to 121st .
Avenue. In short, the construction of SW North Dakota from 121st Avenue through to Scholls
Ferry Road preceded the construction of the homes along that street. Anyone who bought homes
i in that area moved in with full knowledge that the street connected to Scholls Ferry Road. The
two aerial photographs with corresponding dates are attached as Appendix C.
I
The installation of the traffic islands began in 1989; however, there were still complaints after
installation of the islands. In 1990, a consultant firm (JRH Transportation Engineering) was
contracted to review the traffic concerns on the street and develop potential solutions to the
problem. At that time, the installation of traffic circles and closure of the street north of
Springwood Drive were two options suggested by the neighborhood. The study by the consultant
resulted in the development of a variety of options that were considered prior to implementation
j of additional measures on that road. The option that was eventually selected and implemented
I was installation of a traffic circle at the intersection of SW North Dakota Street with each side
street. excepting only SW Tony Court and Summercrest Drive. The City Council at that time was
opposed to closure of the connection to Scholls Ferry Road and fully expected that the selected
solution would resolve the matter once and for all. The selected option was accepted by the
residents of the area at that time. Concerns about the safety hazards introduced by the circular
SW North Dakota Street Progress Report
d Page 2
I
' J
fi
j ',island at the intersection of Springwood Drive and SW North Dakota resulted in the subsequent
removal of that island a few months after installation.
Alternatives
Except for the alternative to install traffic islands to slow traffic speeds, the various alternatives
resulting from the study proposed either partial or total closure of SW North Dakota to through
traffic. One of the options closed North Dakota and routed traffic through Anton Drive. Another
option routed the North Dakota traffic through Springwood Drive and closed the connection to
l Scholls Ferry Road. On the surface, none of the alternatives proposed appear readily acceptable.
Closure of the connection to Scholls Ferry was strongly opposed at the time by some of the
residents of the area and by one of the businesses. The alternatives considered and the pros and
cons for some of the alternatives are attached as Appendix D. F
3 Recommendations
l
~t
• I recommend that a task force be established by Council to review in-depth the
j options proposed by the previous study and to develop any other options that may be
deemed feasible to resolve the problems on this street. This task force should include
representatives from City Staff, City Council, residents of the area, and the businesses -
that are located at the north end of the street. The task force should be given a
reasonable period to examine the potential solutions and report back to Council on the
findings and recommended solution.
3 o I further request that Council provide direction on what solutions would be acceptable
from the task force. If closure of the street and hence the connection to Scholls Ferry
4
Road is not an acceptable option, that should be made clear to the task force at the
onset of the effort. Closure of the street would require an amendment to the
Transportation Plan, and would also run counter to the City's efforts at establishing
connectivity wherever feasible for better distribution of traffic flow.
l It is clear that there is a continuing problem at SW North Dakota. It is time to take a closer look '
j at the possible remedies and reach a solution that would be acceptable to both the City and the
I various parties that are affected by the traffic volumes and speeds through the area. The City
Staff stands ready to participate in the process and actively seek feasible solutions to the
problems on this sueet.
1 Attachments (Appendices A-D)
clcmrwnoEswMooars.ooc
j SW North Dakota Street Progress Report
Page 3
L~
® July 1,' 1997
NOTICE
. 4
City Council Business Meeting
Tuesday, July 8, 1997
7:30 P.M.
Town Hall
The Tigard City Council will review the options that had been proposed in
the past for SW North Dakota Street between Springwood Drive and 121st
Avenue, and will continue discussions on developing feasible solutions for the
traffic problems on that street. This is a continuation of the agenda item f,
addressed in Study Session on June 17, 1997. i.
The meeting begins at 7:30 P.M. The SW North Dakota discussion is
tentatively scheduled to begin at 8:00 P.M.
t'&#GGUSW0140T)CE000 -
APPENDIX A I
s ~
L
L
••DUMMY-T`CLOr 1S134CB-13700
FRITTS, BRETT C AND MICHELLE M I
12113 SW ANTON OR
TIGARD OR 97223
1 _b4CS-13600 1S134CB-13800
LEWIN, KAY F NHIM, VONG & JENNIFER
12109 SW ANTON DR 12121 SW ANTON DR
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CE-13900 1S134CB-14000
SIMS, BRETT M & KAREN J BRICKLEY, GERALD J & MARGIE A
12129 SW ANTON DR 12137 SW ANTON DR
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CB-14100 1S134CB-14200
1 QUIRIMIT, ANA ERLINDA A AND NELSON, BRANDON O & JENIFER J
jUANITO BEN I 12151 SW ANTON DRIVE
12145 SW ANTON DR TIGARD OR 97223
TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CB-14300 1S134CB-14400
TAYLOR, DELL P & DOROTHY A POWELL, WILLIAM V & ELIZABETH
12159 SW ANTON DR 12163 SW ANTON DR
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224
1 4CB-14500 1S134CB-14600
NL, DAVID A & KIMBERLY A KWOK, WAI MING &
12177 SW ANTON DR LI, YUK YIN
TIGARD OR 97223 12185 SW ANTON DR
TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CB-14700 1S134CB-14800 1
BONN, JAMES PATRICK SEQUERA, ANTONIO R AND CARINA I!
12199 SW ANTON DR 12205 SW ANTON DR
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
- 1
1S134CB-14900 1S134CB-15000
BERGSTROM, SUE A PETTY, THOMAS E AND MURIEL A
12694 SW SPRINGWOOD DR 12235 SW ANTON DR
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CB-15100 1S134CS-15200
LOCICAOOD, ROBERT L & LESLIE A DUGAN RUPP, J
12249 SW ANTON DR 12261 SW ANTON DRIVE
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
e 1S134CS-15300 1S134CB-15400
YANG, JOHN O & HARPER, SHAROL R
SHUPING 12295 SW ANTON DR
2~°S3 SW NTON DR TT-GAiRD OR 97223
:IGA.R* OR 97223
1
1S134CB-17500 1S134CB-17600
FBRYANS, DONALD R WU, YANG & DAN
ALP, LINDA A 12286 SW ANTON OR
12298 SW ANTCN OR TIGARD OR 97224
{ TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CS-17700 1S134CB-17800
MITCHELL, BRUCE A & ANDREA C ZEE, CATHERINE CHING-CHING
12272 SW ANTON DR 12254 SW ANTON DR
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CB-17900 1S134CB-18000
ABUAN, FELIX E AND ELIZABETH P HADLEY, KENNETH L
12230 SW ANTON DR 12218 SW ANTON DR j
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CB-18100 1S134CB-18200
PRICKETT, LELAND P & HATTIE MILLS, SCOTT D & DIANA BURDETT
12202 SW ANTON DR 12184 SW ANTON DR
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CB-18300 1S134CB-18400
BOWERS, SHAWN LEE OLDHAM, CHARLES G
12170 SW ANTON DR BY PERFORMANCE PROPERTIES
TIGARD OR 97223 PO BOX 230513
TIGARD OR 97281
1S134CB-18500 1S134CB-18600
FORSYTH, JOHN H & JOANNA C NAKAO, YOSHINORI & EIKO
3849 KLAHANIE DR SE #7-205 12132 SW ANTON DR
ISSAQUAH WA 98027 TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CB-18700
j DARROUGH, CHARLES S & KUMIKO
12110 SW ANTON DR
TIGARD OR 97223
I
{
j I
i
1
is IS134CB-15500 i
4EWLON, DALE R AND CAROL L GENTRY, WAYNE PATRICK AND
12313 SW ANTON DR DEANNA HELENS
IGARD OR 97233 12337 SW ANTON DR
TIGIRD OR 97223
1a'i34C8-15700
1S134CB-15800
COREY, MARK D & KIRSTEN M EDGAR, TROY L &
12351 SW ANTON DR POAD, ALISON
TIGARD OR 97223 12369 SW ANTON DR
a TIGARD OR 97223
a
i '_S134CB-15900
1S134C8-16000
DEHARPPORT, DALE C DEHARPPORT, DALE C
# ?O BOX 1577 PO BOX 1577
9EAVERTON OR 97075 BEAVERTON OR 97075
' IS134CS-16100 1S134CB-16200
SOO, KUM YEW AND VAUGHAN-JONES, PETER & LYNNELL a
TANG, SHEET MAY 12419 SW ANTON DR
12393 SW ANTON DR TIGARD OR 97223
TIGARD OR 97223
_S134CB-16300 1S134CB-16400
=HIEL, MICHAEL S & SHIRLEY A DEHARPPORT, DAVID J & SUSAN B
12435 SW ANTON DR PO BOX 1577
TIGARD OR 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97075
i
i
CB-16500 1S134CB-16600
DEE PPORT, DAVID J & SUSAN B SCHWAGER, KAREN f
?O BOX 1577 12438 SW ANTON DR
BEAVERTON OR 97075 TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CR-16700 1S134CB-16800
BLISS, LUMAN T MILLIS, JILL D
2ANKENBRING, KACY 12394 SW ANTON DR
12406 SW ANTON DR TIGARD OR 97223
" TIGARD OR 97223
1S134CB-16900 1S134CE-17000
?APPIN, JUDITH C MATHISON, MELINDA
12388 SW ANTON DR 12370 SW ANTON DR
A Gr1.RD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 i -
1
134CB-17100 1S134CB-17200
AUKLAS, THOMAS C & STEADMAN, JULIE A
LXTHERINE
12340 SW ANTON DRIVE
y 12362 SW ANTON DR TIGARD OR 97223
{ TIGARD OR 97223
i
-S134CB-17300 SS134CB-
- 17400
;j ?REcaELL, MARTIN K & DE NA M IMPSON, JASON W AN-D STACY J {
3 SW ANON DR 12312 SW ANTON DR
_-GARD CR 97223 TT-GARD OR 97223
i
L~
' S134C846300 1S I3 4C8-06000
>FRANJI• JHAO S RIMA AUSTIN. ROBERT H 6 LESLIE K
3 ':4%0 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 12"0 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
- { ..CARD CR 972:3 ❑GARO.OR 97223
j •s,3,cB-0+400 1S134C"asoo
3ARLOW LEWIS R a NANCY J BASART• MICHAEL S
2350 SW NORTH DAKOTA 11110 SW 124TH PL -
'iGARO.OR 97=3 TWRD.OR 97223
•S131C8-09200 1S134c8-0a7o0
3ATEMAN. CRAIG E 6 BONNIE JEAN BEAN. TERESA E
125 SW 12380 PL ,4072 SW FANNO CREEK OR _
j *IGARD.OR 97225 TIWRO.OR 97224
IS 134CB4"W IS134CS45500
3IGELOW. JOHN a AMY A BTTHER. EDWIN H 6 MARIANN E
'23W SW NORTH DAKOTA 5T 11135 SW TONY CT
- TiWRO.OR 97227 TIGARD.OR 9722]
S134C8-06900 IS134CS-043M
3REAUX ROGER J d GRACE K DAVIS. ARTHUR E 6 E GRACE
'2455 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 12260 SW NORTH DAKOTA
TiWRO.OR 97223 TIWRD•OR 97223
• S, 3408.07600 , S, 34C84M400
3ELUCA JUDY L EDKNAROT. JOAN L t.. .
• n26 OVERLOOK IN 4550 SIN " 1 AVE
]{I-AKE OSWEGO.OR 97034 ALO OR 97007 -
I' S 1340847000 1 S1348C•00403
ELSTROM. ROY NANO AGNES E EOR•WEYER VISTAS INC
"5 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST BY EOURY TAX OEPiJMEADOVVCREEK
GARD.OR 97223
PROP TAX DEFT (2711a) r
1 PO BOX RAda79
11 CHICAGO.IL W690
IS134CS-040DO -
7ORREST. S SCOTT 7S134C8.09700
SW NORTH DAKOTA ST FRIEND. F ANNETTE TRUSTEE
0 11145 SW 123RD PL
rZRD.OR 97223 TIGARD.CR 97=3 -
- ,,5,3408-0660, ,S134C8.05100 y
GLENN, JACOUEUNE GRCCE. OLIVER 8
1:!00 SW NORTH DAKOTA 12450 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
CWRD.OR 97224 TIGARD.OR 97=3 -
ij
I !
S73aC8-06600 IS134CS-CS100 I .
" UTIERREZ EMERITO Z S MA ANIT HAGENBOECK KAREN MARIE
460 SW ANTON OR 11175 SW 124TH PLACE
~WRD.OR 97223 :IGAAD.OR 37223
I
•.7~CB-07200 1S134CS-00700 "
'SEN. ROBERT E S aABErrE L HARMAN, JOHN N 6 MARY C
- 'iS SW 125TH PL 12493 SW ANTON OR
;ARD.OR 97222 T1WRD.OR 97222
' S! 3.CB45300 I S134CB-05701
,!Ar. ICKEN8 TTOM, HOUSTON M AND IBSIES. 8ASM1 AMINMIHAVA BASt : -
' IHARON L 11110 SW TONY CT
• 1105 SW TONY CT TIGARO.OR 97222
'ICARD.OR 97223 "
.t? •SIUCB-09400 1S134C847400
GUCHI, CHIKAKO IRWIN. MARK A AND NANCY J
'1100 SIN 12380 11135 SW 125TH PLACE - - '
TIGARD•OR 97223 TIGARO.OR 97223
' S t 3~C8-09900 I S 13408-05800
c : ENSEN. DENNIS A 8 CHRISTINE C JOHNSON, MARK E AND "T
'1953 SW ANTON OR DEBORAH G
'IGARO.OR 97223 11100 SW TONY CT -
TIGARD.OR 97223
C
- •SIUC8-05700 1S134C84TWO
CHNSON. MARK 60EBORAH G JOHNSON, MICHAEL L 6 LYNNE E
I
- • 1100 SW TONY CT 11170 SW 125TH PL j
'IGARD.OR 97222 TIGARMOR 97222 I
S+ 900 1S134C&08600
- t :YOLA KELLAS. SCOTT THOMAS AND
50 SW NORTH DAKOTA CATHERINE X
"CARD.OR 97273 11120 SW 124TH PL (f
TIGARD.OR 97224 (f!!
. 1
•St34C8.04500 1S134CB-09000
-ANG. ROGER A AND LARUE E LEE. CHAN XEE d NEE SUNG
:2200 SW NORTH DAKOTA 11165 SW 123RO PL -
CiGARD.OR 97223 TIGARO.OR 97273 .
S134C8-04600 IS134CB-05200 r
LOYD. THOMAS GCITIRE M LOPEZ FRANCISCO E d SARAH G +
^310 SW NORTH DAKOTA 12560 SW SUMMERCREST OR L
-C-_AR0.0A 9727^
t 'S134CB43200 IS134C8.06000
MCA K S HAD. PING LIAN MARTING. MERLAN LEE JR
• 155 SW 124TH PL 11190 SW 125TH PL
-GARO.OR 97223 TIGARD.OR 97223 .
S13ACB-041 W IS134CS48M '
'+CCaU-;SUSAN OPPIE MUNNE. SUSAN TAYLOR -
-.220 L ~RTH DAKOTA ST 1964 Ae1NANTE LN .
,GARO. 97=3 SAN JOSE.U 35124
4 j.
f
MIA
F7
1S134CS48400 1S134CS-10000 _
J'BRIEN. JOHN M & SHERYL PANGSORN. JEFFREY L
• 1115 Sw 124TH PL PO BOX 19207 "
':CARO.OR 97223 PORTLINO.OR 97200
•SI34C54N8W 1S134CH-00900
'ARSONS, JUDITH P PATEL SANJAY T b SHILPASEN S
I x170 SW 123RD PLACE 11100 SW 124TH PIL
nWRO.OR 9722] TIGARO.OR 97223
+S134CB-07500 tS134CH-09500 - "
- -ERE?- ANTHONY PETERSEN. HENRY S AND GEROA E
It 123 SW 125TH PL 11110 SW 123RD PIL
71CARO.OR 97223 TIGARO.OR 97223
IS 134CB-090W ISIUCS47700
I PETERSEN. SOREN A POWER, JAMES D b ANNETTE J
IJEANETTE STORM 11130 Sw 125TH PL
111130 SW 123RD PL TIGARD.OR 97713 "
TIGARO.OR 97223
S 134CS-06M IS134C5-07200
ROO PROPERTIES. LLC REGAN. GERALD J b DANA J
:2105 PEREGRINE CT 11105 SW 125TH PIL
'NEST UHN,OR 97060 TIGARO.OR 97223
S134C8-06400 IS134CEWSSOO
ROBINSON. JULIE M ROHLFI ROBERT C AND
•2450 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST JEANNE C .
IGARD•OR 97223 12430 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST - -
TIGARO.OR 97223 -
1!S134CS-09700 1S134CH•08400 ~
SNEDECOR. ESTES b HELEN N SPEZZA. BUD b CARMEN
11150 SW 123RD PL 14266 SW 134TH
7TGARD.OR 97223 TIGARO.OR 97224 -
I
K
tS134C8-00.700 IS134CM7100
STORUEN. ROBERT D d MARILYN STRIBUNG. GRETTA S
• 1135 SW 124TH PL 12433 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST -
CIWRD.OR 97223 TIWRD.OR 97223
- •St34CB45100 IS134CS45000 -
SUTTON, STANLEY J AND REBECCA THOMAS, MARIJKE S
2390 SW NORTH DAKOTA 12370 SW NORTH DAKOTA -
',WRO.OR 97223
TIGARO.OR 97223
'Sf34C84S400 1S134CB4S600
'JANOESERGHE DENNIS C b MICNEL WARE, WILLIAM BERNARD -
_ 1 :125 SW TONY CT AND FRANCES MARJORIE
-IGARD.OR 97223 11130 SW TONY CT g 7 "
TIGARO.OR 97223
i
J
S t 34Ca478W 1 S 104Ca•a.200
VALLICK. ELAINE L WILGER, CAROL ANN -
r• . 10 SW 125TH PUCE 1400 SW TELLURIDE TER
`CARD OR 97220 aEAVERTON.OR 97007
~Y
S 134 loo
*RAY. DOUGLAS L S
EONARO. NOELAN:C '
:020 SW NORTH DAKOTA STREET
.IGARO.OR 97223
f
t.
k T
wq_
Y~ I
`F ~ i I
The NPO #7 Community Plan
and the 1983 Comprehensive Plan
SW North Dakota Street
';13 Detailed information regarding the provisions of the NPO #7 Community Plan for SW
North Dakota Street and the changes brought about by the 1983 Comprehensive Plan
are as follows:
The NPO #7 Community Plan
I
c: The NPO #7 Community Plan was adopted on January 23, 1979. TRAFFIC AND
TRANSPORTATION POLICIES in the plan regarding North Dakota read as follows:
h
• "POLICY 19. It is intended that the collector that extends NW from 121st
and the extension of N. Dakota Street that joins with the extension of
Spring-wood Drive, should not be a major bypass that would carry cross
community traffic across from Scholls to the Tigard Community, to the area
of Greenburg Road. This should be implemented by stop-signs and the
maintenance of existing off-set intersections.
• POLICY 20. Access onto Scholls Ferry Road shall be limited to the major
collectors indicated on the approved NPO #7 Plan map and the approved
access for the commercial development to be located at 121st and Scholls
'j Ferry Road."
The 1983 Comprehensive Plan
In 1983, the NPO #7 Community Plan was superseded with the adoption of the city's
Comprehensive Plan.
In the transportation section of volume 1 of the plan, the need for new collector streets
was addressed as follows:
NPO #7:
Due to the lack of developed areas west of 121st Strect, there are a number of collector
street connections needed in the NPO #7 area. All of the collector connections would
be minor collectors. These would include:
11 1. The extension of Springwood Drive west of 121st Street to 130th;
2. The extension of North Dakota Street west of 121st to Scholls Ferry Road;
E•r~ 3. The extension of 130th from Scholls Ferry Road to 128th and to Falcon Rise j
Drive; and
APPENDIX B
Page 1 j
i
s I
i
4. The extension of Murray Boulevard to 135th as provided in the NPO #3
section.
i
The transportation plan map that reflects North Dakota Street west of 121st as a
collector was adopted by City Council May 9, 1983. No one testified in support or
opposition at the city council meeting. However. Yvonne Larson, a former NPO #7
member did testify in opposition of the extension of North Dakota to Scholls Ferry at
the Planning Commission meeting on January 18, 1983.
The site development review decision for the Meadow Creek Apartments refers to the
Comprehensive Plan calling for a minor collector street between Scholls Ferry and
North Dakota.
Condition #2: of the Site Design Review approval reads as follows:
C. DECISION
The Planning Director approves DSR 22-84 subject to the following conditions:
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET
i PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS.
j 2. Standard full and half-street improvements to minor collector standards {
including sidewalks, curbs, street lights, and driveway aprons shall be provided along
the frontaee of the Sorrento Road-North Dakota Street extension. A cul-de-sac meeting-
City standards shall be provided at the end of the Springwood Drive. The local street
coming from Summerlake shall connect with the collector street and shall be
constructed to the City standards for a local street. All the improvements noted above
shall be completed prior to occupancy.
1^.crrYW0eN0APB.D0C "
i
I
I i
i
APPENDIX B
Page 2
i
- I
i
1 : j .f E tit. ~ ; r ~ ' ~.r ~ 1 _ •v,+ W
n :'t J r . Ott` ~i•~.td'. • rl ~ ;il") ~r i. ,~r~R i ~wy' ! ~ n\ a ~ is '6 .s ~'ti>. d y r• ! '?..47Ew~~/ :e16~ .~L11~9 YY. '~n"~~.I'~.i ~'LY•~ • h ,.1
i.c 7~' , fib, ' i i„ M 1'' ~'i r A ~
t1,1,, 51 i l17 .1' 'F it . ~ `iI r_+-.~: z(wi z.'.'S. xT~~. .v a i'; AiY. _3,fi e.. ~v~„~q.
Y~:~ 't 3 _ F .rah is t, ~i !~1 r I` l -f'~.;' Ij y~,Wt',~a .p~ .7~, + ,r, r
~ ,.e,,,:,; . ' -.:_'-mac-- _ ,r! k:'•,. ~ ~ L • \ , -
.~M~: 'fit ~ _ _ _ ^ L.. ' ~ ' U'.
"'d 4 , rq 11 SIT r. ~'~~'4 ~ [p~ ~ ~ i ~ .,!'1'~' ' CAS', '~is f ~:I v C. . {a .a.. -I
' 4 e 1; ,.J, Pt : ~ '
3/~.. 1 ~i A t „ Asx' ` ~ o- a~ 3: a: ,
?:!f' ``e ,~`.."?Tnf'i'3 ''r¢ '"'~4~i1`rnre^pp ~ ro,~y~~7 S',~'A 1~• ~.•Tr V rfA• I is, y~1~,J'~F7{ 1'{2~ If .r. ~^.:,C i L~,Q. Y(r¢fl
I •X•!r ~~Z.r. I ~''fP~ 1{ei1F 'f '.it;j2 NP'}y2f 11 I 1 , fl'•r . ~ ? 1: ,'t~`: s'.,~ r ~ ~,8 a!s•, rr YYw:°° " w i • d fir. '
• ;9. j ~ i . r ,~r.r, ~ ~r n .gy ti1~7` , ;z~+r• ~ : , t'. ~'q i:. .x 3~_, ~ i !(M rf~l ~ F 3'~ : L Lv •I p't' i~ 1. 4.,;c~i f 't. IY
i '~.1 p~}y~~ 11 ~1 r4t;k 'I nr~ ' ~qpw Y 1• ~1 + el K-; 17'1' 4x ~ !'A/.- SM ~ F{..1"
~`s :'"'1 i ' 3§ ~•l .ri ~jdrnr ~ :n f ~ ~r,:r" ~ 3~.'' 6,, ~ Eiy~ i'^z , fyj• i:~ ,S. t, i P 7r ~ rrY ' !r . ~ ~tje tyA ~ yt " 1+ ~ ;
}~I > ;F•, , a r, dig .j d: " a~, TrT ~i~.~:enn'rr T ~ ~ r' 'rr ~•K * > r.. ~'•h
,~Y-~ z 3 wM1~a;..+a.trr-i4vq 9 ~ y~ ~x~r~:~~; q y~t~ .,G, a"\ I.y~,y A ~.7
-.~1~I ' Y y ~ fps fl r L ~ ' li;j: xtf 7yN \ "'~'a~ ~ 4~ ~ d ,i `..,e.tY ,Y ~~C' ~ r x F . ~1~•, IIN w _ !~1 s r~~~ '4'' 't~~" ~"r +~',1 Q- •V(^ ti:., W ,i. S a g~}'
1 ~ '1 ri r l ,C-~I 1 i 1 1 ~ r, ~ a /5~?~-• •a~ C ~'J : {L f,
) < ( ~•dA. ~;Nyva..; ter... 4 y ~t ~~ww^t •yS x a „ _v ti + i~~~n .{C f'. t I ^+~f1. r/~1Yru'+ J' 6 '.1•V,• ~ f'~ •1' 1 a
x[L II N + ~ ~
~;c d A r ?~f,~ 2 1 ,1, .a5 ' ti~ ,~I ~'~Y,.
'~tal.j ~ z.. •~`•:,.7 °~tud9+ gip;,
~ ~ J.,w' ~ ' ;.r t 5^ r #
"~5f t' !S ; ~ ~ 'nryk,a v~d~ -¢a q . ,6 o¢~
;'r;l i 'pia ~fa[ .ad;/'~' . vy r ~ I 'f 9: Lf l'?:~ p41"l~iT..r t~} e. T OJ U
- .a.
. t~ _~~yy' ~t.;r--G`,~ ~°,~,~'n'•c••••~ yt~ ~~'''~!,}nY, 1'w.~`t~r '`~,~~t: r;i'•~_, C1~~
•!M + i.• l~K~...V ~ i j ~ ~ ,r>rAj ly~r ',r IL I ;'t ,r;' ~ ..yA'+i' ~}r ~ ~T~'' ~ ~ 1? I. 'L~ r.,~rr~ ! i 'l' L .wnl. 'i w h~y 3 ~rl: i ~ .~~y~ ~ ~'i {il ~"1
~ +:L y: ~ ~`~f+ tir ~ 'i~,~l-;wi•„~h~~41 ,~o„ ~"r`.h.~ ~ o W v,
w~.. dr0 :~1. ~d I'~•y i. 'M: :Vn - .rC^- Dili}.' )jl a. '3' ~IJ,,, '3` ~b'S iF '>♦~„?~+}q• ;un+~o." ~p '.ri ~ ~ ' . ; ,n'~py ago c ' ! .i~".y:~c LTA' . 'q•,",'; ',w,
~ '1 ~ ~ ~ ~a~r~' i. Rj'g, +1r c, ` :,5•.ah><nN,n' ~a~ ~ f 3~~A~'_ 3 ~ rnim ~~`6 • F, I 7 r 7~ --r• b' Y ~ ~'k~~:~ ..r~~~~.'(~ ~'z +f'~' r ~ + r ~7 ' i i5+'
of ! T w ~ z ~ _`~tir~i~~% '~I? ~i is ,n, ?6l ' ~'L '`8
S• If this notice appa:u's clearer thin ibe I •
aUG `v ~i 1998 document, the documznt is of m;;rginal ,n,eiq, MICROFILMED
~~~f~l~Pj~f~i~~ ~Ii~Ii~ilij~li~ijij~I~~~I'I~i~'I~lil~~if~l'I~i'I~~Iiill~iii!i i~ij!~i i! ii!'~fi~r~Ir t.~Ii i i .1i I iii~i I'i IIIi l~lil~lilil iilll}iilflllli t i~11t IlIi111~!~lk~' INCH ( MADE Ia CH INA2 I 4 i ~ I I ~ i I ~ I l t l l r ~ I l l~ I C I I l._ I 1 r ..I I i I
- 6 1 II ' 1 2 3 d S- fi ~ T 6 I 9 I lP I I I 12 13 14 IS 16 11 18 1B 1Q tl. • a :-'~=33=' td - 16 36- '=:A-='.' 26C:. 18 30 ~ '
'llll~lllllllll~lllllllll)lilllllll~lllll!III~III!IIIII~II!IIIIII~III(~!II!III!IILIIlII!II?IIIIpIQIii?~Illllillflfllf~l!II~IIIII~III~lllllllll~lllll!Ill~illdpll~lllIIIIII~f IIIIIII,~~IllIIIIU~IIIfIII(I~IIi11111.I~IIIIIIIIIfIfgfllll~l!iI~IIII~'!I:.Il~flili!Illllllllllfllll IIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIII~LIilii~i!
„ •
r
~S1FA., ~ I L .1 : J1., ~ . l ~R { ,,~,LEf , FJ ) • ~Y".4r, ,
-1 ' ' • + ~"~Yi E9M'1 y ~ car`, ° ~a L l r ~ r, , f~~~ ~ , . , a C• ~s tt ,,,w .1 - ~
. ~ A Sytt I d .y ~ ~ y ~ ~ { ~,i k~~`r, ! / i ~ 1~~err..g,, . G . 1j ~',y'. a ~ . '.>uv , ~ 1. t>.. ~ ~r, . - ' i~ I 3
C i c',: i , t ~,^~,L~1~~.~q '.r
, ~ . i a,~ - ,V.,
l~. y 1. 1 . ~ r~ ~ _ ~ _ -",t~ . .r-Y ~ - - ~x , Y ) ~ L 111 11 11 .p : ~ 1 • _ a'
rt , sit ;•:~i~l",l ~ ,„fir tfI-t,laoii~tg~ -
r i } ~ 311t1f ~ . ! :r 71:... a
t > ~ i t z i. ~ h ~ e't ~ F e4~', I
'~Y.. ~SY. ~ o t~' [ L 11 "'.'%[::7{~ Jq il~d F. 'i "",~~t'~~; f -•.r~P1~i~t f t. , ~_.,l'1•rM1l.r'ttrJ ~i `t1N t ~
_..b tt _7. I F, Et.. 1 ~ ~i~ 'i t `~t It 1°~ JJ R v S ttt `i t ~w
r & K 1~ t t l t. t
;kt ~k I: t1l (tttY tNt(` ~ ®1~' ~ ~vC - w .t r -
{ •I r
t L~' ~a11 i... ~ [ ~ 'kE ;FiV llk~llKtL6,F~! ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ S ~a,• '~lr ~5~..
.:t~ ~r y.. iy%,y ~'~A ~ ' ~I`!^FiAa!•w2'~ ,r/NYI' , , 1 FT -4 :Y~ _ ~~irl ~ 1},~' Y
d [N to n, ~ r "WfC~aum - I IUCt It i I y ~ 4 - 1.~ 1 ~ 7,4~
~!`Yx~J aFj ~h:. , j 1 _,i ~ ~a v 0:. 9 'SF S !C 2 i~
T,N ~'I~ ~ ' r r , . . f y. If I~ .n it~^ TI x
.7 ~ r f i '~eS.i. xV rti , , ,i ~''T- kkp~r c. .
~.rik ` 1 -
3"'~ t.'
_ ~ r l ~ .r I r t ( i r:' J, ',kgi4~F - ~ y!~." .nom, 1.
- s ' ' ' ~ FMK , r ~ h . ~ .cp~q I
t,,,;~,,s!-ti+ ,h'~e ~1^' "Y.~ w ~ I "".t,, {l:~'fll,~i a'~-y'c . ...lw . yf,• p~
1
,
,r ~ '
~ . _ ~ I r av
ai 1 f M"h c,' .1s.: ~
If Ihis nulicc ;q,pa:u•s clcucr :h;m Inc C. 1998 i •
document, the documcn, is of maI'gin;,l quautt, MICR~TILM~I)
~rTrifij~l~~l Ilf~i~r~(~Ijili~iji;!~ijiji~lilj!~iji~ilji~ljl~ ~I;~j(;I~(li~ili~iil~iu~i i~rililri;i . Ili~i i'~ ~ ~ lil'1 I'i i i !I!~f~lilil ifllll~llfi Ili trll~ ill ~i Ill~ll~ INCH I MADE IN CHINA2 ~ 4, i I ~ i I I I ~ I~~, ~ I I I I t, I_ I-.. ~ .I , ( I i
6 i II I =m-2 i b I S- fi i L I 0 I 1~ I1• ,I, 12 17 14 1S Ifi II 19 18 ~ 20 -21. • ~ -;23*= . id 2S 26- -:A--_ZHS 28 JD ! '
'llll~llillllll~llfil!II!~I~!II!gll~'VIII!Ilhil!!!IIfI~IIIIIII!I~Illfl!li!~Ill~lllllill!I~i~~~ltlllllill~fflilii~iiiflill!D~plllflll~'~'I!flll~lllll!Iil~Ilu~~IfI~IIIIII111~i111111lI~~UIIIIIII~piIgll~Ili111111~ffliii(O~Iff!IIIII~I!il(IIII~'•!Illllgili!dlul~gllll~ll~ll111flll~ll[iiliu~niliii~
,r .
j _ p"
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
GOALS
• Reduce 'Through Traffic on S.W. N. Dakota Street
• Permit Emergency Access to All Portions of Neighborhood
• Do Not 'rransfer Problem to Another Neighborhood
• Permit S.W. Summercrest Dr. Traffic to Access Traffic Signal
at S.W. 125th and S.W. Scholls Ferry Road
' APPENDIX D
i
ROAD
SCHEMATIC SCHOLLS FERRY
2%O iu
pY
StPSE HIGHW ~o
SCNOllWg00 CI
C„~p0.y
4wCM000 4i
So~NOM H
PoO F
C~
O r
Sk =
109 -
Qfl ~ s
f0
I
O
7
SW NAWIC'S S[AFO Sr. *O
SX SNow -
AroJH
O S.W. ANION
S04 - _
4Q m _
IAX[ OaNC y _
M YAN AAcT
- - cr.
N n
o -
c4ote ~ ~ G =
CIRCL[ y`A, O o 0
utr
o
T.M. -001N Ol.o[A SUM
ALTERNATIVE 1 LEGEND
INSTALL TRAFFIC CIRCLES 0 TRAFFIC CIRCLES
EXISTING DRIVEWAY
JPIH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
s ,
I
JPH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
i s
IID
ISLAND 090 ALTERNATIVE 1 DETAIL
INSTALL TRAFFIC CIRCLES
U
T^n-- % 'J. TRAFFIC CIRCLE
LECEPA
f _
TRAFFIC CIRCLES
try PARKING PERMITTED
2 1 I
POTENTIALLY IMPACTED DRIVEWAYS >
1 /
S N
- TYPICAL VEMCUM PATH N I' ISO' F Ir 1~~ 3
0 WO-50' r=45' 6
0
0
f ~
O S.W. ANTON
I N
A I
I
ISLANDS S.W. 4ANSANIIA Cl.
L t
YI M
N N
~ 3 3
mummommumm.
l0
j
N SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD
SCHEMATIC
P
5(P'l NIGHVI 2 At
CH`COKT ScmOLLWOOO Ci.
S
S.N. SF SyFU.,;.000 C.
NOW
i -
0
SN ' -
'TO t
4p(
OW4.
O!
O
SW NAYK1 YE/.a0 ST. TFp
SN 1
Sx°N,~
SM. ANION -
rG~+ '
L.K° °a vc
SY YAYIANNA
C I.
°aar► LILT Coca a,`or N =
ALTERNATIVE 2 SW
LEGEND
CLOSE NORTH DAKOTA
NORTH OF.-SPRINGWOOD CT. EXISTING DRIVEWAY 1^u
.JlaH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
.00
i RQP ~A
N
MA'iVC SCMOltM000 Ct.
SCKE
VI-
~GN
••S~Pt6 NN y C,
N ~
f
1.r. J~.tA..
hv000 `
z
0
i
Jy
Spgtt ~ t
K rr, <ro
Y .
S.W. RMTON ~
0[RRD Si, sr srOr I*LJM - SM M~ RyR1R
SM HRKR'S - Ct
- ~y N
JLkVt Ott ~ ~ S1F[CI
{ LDiC N Sy. 10%19 0001,
yC.
[dClf
ptACuR v. LEGEND
AY ENGINEERIt+G
EXISTING DRIVEW
JRH YRAtiSFORfAttON~_----
A~TE~NpTRTw DpK~~~
' I.
a
J ~ pA0` sQ
• FCRRY t~
SCHCMA110 SGHOLCS
u.aa.om
t
a., Y
n
l
D
!t St
txac _
CKII
u
LEGEND
RA DIVERTER TV E r LANE DESiGNAZiONS
Ex1S71NG OitIVEW AY
AL
PAR
QQD lAH TRANSPOATAiION ENWtICCRtN G
AT SPRiNGW
NpRTHgpRN[) PERMITTED a..J
I
...~u~aw:Ia:a-:~J_.:u•..m.....o.•=::.ti;i:[.c.a ,...ri_..a:.:~.J.,IF.. ~-.~~.:C.._~.r_i...isG~.:l......d:...:...a.~ii.._4~ a
ttttttttt~tttttttt~tttttttt~
4k- i /
N
SCHEMATIC
•J FERRY RDPD
SCNOLLS
' St L HIGHW
s
t~ t. vnwc.aw a
f. 1YKi ttYO tt. p '
t • .n
wt a _
. W[if1 [Kt[ „ - - -
4 ~ w
ALTERNATIVE 5
PARTIAL DIVIERTER LEGEND
AT SPRI1dG~4/OOD (-LANE DESIGNATIONS
[--EXISTING DRIVEWAY
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
I
/J JP"IH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
Partial Diverter _ ALTERNATIVE 7
Existing Island INSTALL TRAFFIC DIVERTERS
possible removal
m LEGEND
• 's
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
1 POTENTIALLY IMPACTED DRIVEWAYS
O 6
fl~~ N
N 011 Y 100 IY
0
7
I ib
S.W. ANTON
P
I Partial Diverter
t"
A
Existing
Islands
L y 4 S.W. -hiAhITA CT.
G
N ry
3 3 ;
{L, N N N
S~. Existing
Diverter
& Island
rc
,A
i=
in
A
c
t
r I
z t f
C
JPH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
ALTERNATIVE 8
Existing Island CLOSE S.W. DAKOTA
LEGEND
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
"Q- POTENTIALLY IMPACTED DRIVEWAYS
s
°P Phase 1: Close S.W. N. Dakota al S.W. 1213t
s <
Phase 2: Extend median through S.W. Summercrest Drj (AAJb4 L Z f
Phase 3: Porlial dtverler at S.W. Anton fW~ A Y H
a ;
a
o N
~ ~u w ao Iw
6 S.W. ANTON
I
t Phase 3
Existing
Islands
a
M1 C J 5.W. YANIANIIA CI.
t L t
h _ A
N N
0
Existing
3 Diverter Phase 1
Phase 2 & Island
W
7
IA
r
ROAD ..r._.- m
SCKOLtS FERRY ~ ~ ,
N H
SCHEMATIC -rF m
i' P C
PY 2tp 1crt ~1L I{At r! E{. 0).% Nil
. 5I xi.Kl' F St10 v{ n'S•,1`+ho_o5', n. '
J S G rc
ter.+e ~u.~•:. s; i• ~n
c
. Di1~Y+' ry~ >=as~Dr av. an~~'~uc v
U -`rQ~~ic vi
CF.
Ir!cv
'wo
Jn s'*a~, ~ Vf 1{ G~ rir~il'.. Q
i .~Gll L'tGl~ Y _
e r114 IwAIj1Xh (p, N
n~2•~ ,I, l:vcdc. -
GW V1b6u~ 4ntfIT i
? OlL v)
r-+ OViv'a w'FS~ On
P't" 3g,
W
pr yA.YY HMD at.
~\l.~/J ~?~A, n fro.L. -
qa Sm. "aat /
14~~ r y vrtA , W
otR Cwtt
U[T S.W. NORM tiAxD]A ME, C.
G
t~
LEGEND ~4c tielULI A"6-•-'e. "
No4c . ►oca o
ALTERNATIVE I o TRAFFIC CIRCLES cwA+a( ~5S 1;15 R. by
INSTALL. TRAFFIC CIRCLES ~EXI AY
STINGDRIYEMI Jp eTRANSPRTAToN RANG
1
1
o SPEED TABS
Spnngwood
LO
m
L~l
STOP SIGN
E- i Temporary closure during Srholls
construction
130th opening & connection to
k• MHavMs Beard
x k -1, q Scholl's Ferty Rd construction
~ completion + 3 month period
a
PERMANENTSOLMON
tx BARRICADE--op. 12 ft
gee. x One lane access - built to
prespecified description
"ir e`t w - Traffic circles at cul de sacs built
LT~
to prespecified description
improvements to island at 121st
Flt,,; i•
_ t
L~ z 4; Q t
Q Z
Fit EE
rn C. Ui I
CV p R+
¢ 9
r K U1
'J It C U a U
6
}
FIN
~ SpxplLS FERRY _ ~
a
scttEUAltc
SCMOtL~000 [t.
-/.-SPY
p-A
51
1k S4e _ ~ i {
n x~ SC,
s 1
z
l
O
y
~ S rl. 0116» ,
10,x•! !1 µ0 !1. L{N 11•
' '~7 ut M WM
h.
O i „ r
M a ~ s
M6tl- O+IOt. S1K~~
o \
♦ /_•lj'f lit 1
i 4aGr'i 4I •
LEGEtt~
CIRCLE o 7RAFfiC CIRCUS
R~,~ATIVE ~~X~SYtKC oR►v~wAY (RANSPORTAtION EtiGiNCERING
INSTALL TRAFFIC
SW North Dakota Traffic Alternatives
Alternate 1, install Traffic Circles:
Advantages:
Does not change possible traffic movements.
Will reduce traffic speeds.
May reduce volume of through traffic.
Disadvantages: .
High maintenance costs.
Potenti
al fixed-object obstruction in roadway.
May make it difficult for truck access through neighborhood. f
Alternate 2, Close North Dakota North of Springwood CL:
Advantages:
Reduces through traffic.
Separates commercial traffic from residential traffic.
Disadvantages:
May create through traffic pattern on Summer Lake Drive and
Springwood Ct.
Complicates emergency access.
Alternate 3, Realign S.W. Anton:
Advantages:
Eliminates through traffic on segment of S.W. North Dakota. t
Disadvantages:
May produce same problems on new through street.
Does not address problems on North Dakota between Anton and
Springwood Court.
nuua'nic -
4, Pact" Diverter at Springwood - Northbound Permitted:
Advantages:
Reduces southbound traffic.
Relatively low construction cost.
Disadvantages:
Does not affect northbound traffic.
May increase traffic in adjacent neighborhood.
1
1
Alternate 5, Partial Diverter at Springwood:
Advantages:
Low installation cost.
Will reduce northbound through traffic.
Disadvantages:
Does not affect southbound through traffic. !
May divert some through traffic to Summer Lake Drive.
~aT t
a~
I
r
t
_ ~ f
I
I MEMORANDUM I
CITY OF TIGARD ►
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
?i
FROM: William A. Monahan, City Manager
DATE: July 2, 1997 !
SUBJECT: Metro Initiative
Attached is a copy of the draft "An Act to Prohibit Regional Governments." Mike Burton
distributed this to the Washington County Managers last week. It was re-filed on June 24,
1997. The new draft contains various changes to the original.
Among the changes noted by Mike are:
(2.)(c)(i) - Calls for transferring responsibility for "park, open space or zoo owned or
j{{ operated" by the regional government. Thus, Metro's owned facilities would be given
;J to cities or counties to own and operate. This could result in the City of Portland
receiving the zoo to operate, along with the ability to tax regularly for capital and other
expenses.
Another issue is the reference to "any bonded indebtedness." Mike feels this means
counties would be able to impose a property tax outside the limit to pay debts.
Cn thr countyy resp risible for the Convention Center (Multnomah) would be able to a()
_
outside the metro area and charge property owners in other parts of the county who 1
now do not pay for this metropolitan area center. j
;i (2)(c)(ii) - The MERC would continue to operate until the Legislature creates a new
'i commission to handle facilities. Thus, MERC operates while the Legislature decides
what to do. The Legislature is directed to merely create another entity.
j.
IOWA
i
Memo. to Council
r.. July 2, 1997
Page Two
Mike suggests that if this process is adopted, at least four new districts will need to be created; i,
solid waste, transportation, zoo, region-wide park district. Each would have a group of
elected officials.
He also feels the initiative would effectively eliminate the UGB, leaving decisions on UGB
amendments to either the state or individual cities.
WAM\jh
attachment
.dm~bdI\( 70?97-2.dm
}
sd ~
- y
r
i
i
x~
stj
jij I
a o w ~
a g~ g
G d 8
C'j id
L
~ pO p
1 N ~ 4 tl
8 m. e ~ T
' 4 C r V
hL
3 ~ b
9
El
US" "
77
City of Tigard
Notice to Builders and Developers
Change in Collection of Parks System Development Charges
(SDCs) for Multiple Tenant Developments
This is to notify you that the City of Tigard, effective July 28, 1997, will change its
procedure for collecting parks SDCs on multi-tenant leasable construction. s..
In May 1996, the city began collecting a park SDC for non-residential development of
$49 per employee. Until now, this charge has been collected when the building owner
applies for a certificate of occupancy for the tenants or when the building owner applies
for a building permit for tenant modifications.
Under the new procedure, effective July 28, 1997, the fee will be collected at the time
of the issuance of the permit for the building shell. The fee will be a one-time charge
based on the applicant's estimate of the number of building employees. Subsequent
park SDC fees will not be collected.
The reason for this change is to make the park SDC easier to administer. Existing tenants
often shift to make room for new tenants. This has made it difficult to track which
employees already have been accounted for. The new procedure will bring the application
of the multi-tenant SDCs into line with the procedure established for other types of I
commercial/industrial development and help reduce the potential for under- or over-
charging that can result from inaccurate or incomplete tracking information. It will
increase efficiency and improve turn
-around-time.
k
The decision to change the point of collection will not change the basis for determining f
the fee. Self-reporting will continue to be used as the method of determining the ( .
number of employees. Likewise, the amount of the charge will remain unchanged at
S49 per employee.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the new procedure, please call Duane
Roberts at 639-4171.
UlryNdds&.pto
'P
. j
t MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: William A. Monahan, City Manager
DATE: July 2, 1997 I'
1 I
SUBJECT: Balloon Festival Costs
During the recent Festival of Balloons, the City incurred costs in Engineering, Public Works,
Police, and Administration. Staff has calculated the costs associated with the City contribution _
a to the event. In addition to City contributions, volunteer help from local corrnunity law
enforcement agencies was employed.
The breakdown of expenses and functions is as follows:
f.
Enoineerino Staff was involved in surveying and laying out parking on adjacent land ' -
and school property. A total of 41 hours of staff time was contributed to
the event. Four employees spent time on the event, at a total cost of
$696.03.
Public Works Staff worked with the event organizer before and throughout the event to
make sure the City facility was ready to accommodate the huge daily
crowds. Fields were mowed, the stage was set up, sisgns made and set
up, barricades placed, and facilities repaired. The major exper.,,e and
time commitment was clean-up during and after the event. In total,
818.75 hours were contributed to the event, at a labor cost of
$18,963.00. Of the 818.75 hours, 340 were devoted to Festival clean-
up and restroom cleaning. Material costs were $2,810.67, electrician
costs $1,143.35, and soccer field restoration work $5,687.50. A total of
$9,641.42 of out-of-pocket expenses were contributed by the City. Total
Public Works expense for the event was $28,604.42.
Memo to Council
July 2, 1997
Page Two
Police Police contributed 432.75 hours to the event, at a total cost of
$11,995.83. Of the amount, $6,673.59 was overtime pay. We also
received 708 hours of volunteer time from our Reserve Officers, two
troopers from the Oregon State Police, and Reserves from Beaverton,
King City, Sherwood, Tualatin, and West Linn. Volunteers from
Pacific Northwest Search and Rescue also contributed. I
A mini ~ Cathy Wheatley devoted hours throughout the months leading up to the
Festival to coordinate the City staff involvement. She and other
Administration employees staffed the City of Tigard tent on the Festival e
grounds throughout the activities. A total of 16 hours of staff time was
devoted to staffing the tent, at a cost of $265.14.
;j -
Total oct The total estimated cost of City services to the Balloon Festival are as
follows:
Engineering $ 696.03
Public Works $28,604.42
Police $11,995.83
j Administration $ 265.14
Total $41,561,42 I
The above information is presented to show the actual cost of the City's participation in the
event. The figures do not, however, reflect the time devoted by staff from several
departments throughout the year doing the planning and coordination of the event. In
j addition, the volunteer hours given by employees are not shown. City employees, led by
Kathy Davis, volunteered many hours to the event souvenir sales.
Now that cost figures are in, I suggest that we have an informal discussion with event f
coordinator Bruce Ellis to review options to reduce City costs. Bruce has already stated that
i
the event would like to contribute inward the cost of some repai.*s and improvements to the
park which are required because of the event. Staff also has some preliminary ideas of ways
to affect costs.
f
7 We will contact Bruce Ellis to determine his availability to attend either the July 22 or
August 12 or August 19 Council meeting.
WAM\jh
i:\2dm\bill\702197- 10. doc
~ i
h
t
City oCTigard, Oregon Page 1 01 72
City of Tigard Parks
Tigard is blessed with many areas of natural beauty including the Tualatin River and Fanno Creek. Tigartparks take
advantage of these natural features as well as provide playgrounds and various sports facilities fotactivities such as soccer,
volleyball or softball.
Tigard parks are open 8:00 a.m. to dusk every day. Ball fields and picnic areas can be reserved by calling thCity of Tigard at -
6394171. Dogs are allowed in parks on leashes only.
Cook Park
17005 SW 92nd Drive ~ i
_ On the banks of the Tualatin River. Cook Park has something for cveryone. There are baseball, softball and soccer fields.picnic areas,
a fishing dock, a small boat ramp, a children's playground and hiking trails. Originally 36 undeveloped acres the park has grown over j
time to its present size of over 51 acres. I h,
"l
Summerlake Park
11450 SW Wnterlake Drive
With two footbridges crossing it, Summer Lake is the centerpiece of this park. The lake is home to numerous waterfawland aquatic
w animals. This is an area of open spaces interspersed with small woods whcre one can enjoy the natural surroundings or use various
play areas.
;j
Fanno Creek Park
Located behind 77gard City Nall between Hall Boulevard and Main Street
This natural area along a stretch of Fanno Creek is a wonderful place to view wildlife, catch crawfish. and let thehustle-bustle of
urban life melt away. The tloodplain area is mostly grassy or wooded wetland that provides habitat fora variety of small animals. j
Woodard Park
- Located adjacent to Johnson Street between Walnut and Tigard Streets
( -
On a heavily wooded bend in Fanno Creek. this park is a pocket of tranquillity in a growing community. A pedestrianpath winds
through this arcs. f
Englewood Park
Located south ojScholls Ferry Road at SW Soringwood Drive -
Stroll along a path, relax while the little ones climb on a play structure. then continue on to the creek. Englewood is awalkers park
with a variety of interesting things to see and do as you traverse the trails. The park is split into an eastand west segment, but each is
easily accessible from the other by a short walk on ironwood Loop.
Windmill Park ~
Tuesday, July 01, 1997 12:52 PM
I
~ J
Pity of Tigard, Oregon Page 2 oft
- - Located at the corner of 121st Avenue and Katherine Street - -
't. ITuilt around the turn otthe century to pump water on the Wood-Christensen t'arm. this histaric windmill has been aTigard landmark
_;_f}a for years. The windmill, preserved on its original site. is a visible link to Tigard's agricultural past.
Jack Park
Located north of l i$lnut Street and east of 127th
This five and one-half acre grassy area features a creek and a small playground.
Allah
r
C-'
4
%
+ Tuesday, July 01, 1997 1i
12:52 PM j
f i I
k
I
City
of Tigard, Oregon Page I of I
'y'117 Cook Park Recreation Area
Located south al Durt," Road at the end of 92nd.wmue near 77gard Hlgh School
To reserve one aflhe covered pavilions, softball or soccerlields at Cook Park. cull our PorkReservallon
„Ills Hotline at 639-6556,.041. or E-mail us at Bark Rrservmlons.
Covered pavilions can be reserved up to one year in advances
Far reservationsplease include the following information:
I
Name
E-mail address
• Nailing address and phone number
A
Dates and times desired for reserving park Include alternate bates
Sheller fJ and/orJield(s) desired Include estimated number of people in parry.
EMT -W~~
Picnic Shelter 91
Picnic Shelter 92
3
New soccer 6 talibal!)fefds ear renroaar d playground area
Co:ard pmiltan with i stationery tables Covered pavilion with IS stationery labia
Electrical hookups taricai hookups
- Dv 3 s 3 barbecue grills Three 3 1 3 barbecue grills
Re trootns nearby tstroomr nrarbr
D.0 bast bibs ILO hors 6161 u - -
Athletic Fields Additional Facilities OW
I I
l I _..a
oJ76at! F(eldr al and 92- olfrybait courtr (2) (Bike trails
otter Fields ql. a2 and 03 I Boa! ra+rrp and/(shingdock ,Horseshoe pin
,t iBarketbsil courts iWatking nails
!Largeplavground
j • (Softball Dues and other sports related equipment are not supplied through the City of Tigard.) ~
a
9 Tuesday, July 01. 1997 1:10 PM
,.t
i
City of Tigard, Oregon Page I of I
Summerlake Park Recreation Area
Located in northwest Tigard, south of Scholls Ferry Road and east of 135th
Avenue (11450 SW Winterlake Drive)
!'s To reserve the covered pavilion or small ballJleld at Surnmerdake Park, call our Park y
Reservation Hotline at 6.19-6556 x611 or E-mail us at Park Reservations -~,y:3s -
' Covered pavilion can be reserved top to one year in advance. .r,yi ~
For reservations nlea_se include the rollowineiarormadan: v {d
Name i .
E-mail address f
Mailing address and phone number ~
Dares and times desired Include alternate dates
Include esdorwwed number ojpeople in party.
Picnic Area Features Additional Facilities
- >i • !
Cowed pavillm with 6 stationery tables Tennis courts (1) t
Electrical hookups lSmdl battbaR field -
I'.e 1-l/." barbecue grill Basketball court (1) 1.
Ranoamr nea: by Walking ndls
;f Little wash slob at the ratroomr a playground
me bib (key must be picked up prior to eves) kNWild11/e
Drlwk/ng foanralns (2)
cnic la es an gnus ocatt throughout the park tee o c arge)
I
~0000~
Tuesday, July 01. 1997 1:11 P'M
1
data i. Hands...Over
~
nt "
on r TO
r gees
r ctute. Builders and develop
u•
alto Jim Funk,
• .planning services. the same tees to plans Examiner
rm 'am will pay did to Supervising ext. 39
'is not dust BuilMountain, Beginni
Noincluding veber,
effe rig In m
Pe. .
want to build a home in sheetma,rig ncS- the City olT that
t1: I Walnut island and an area fixing Washington County.
north of the Tualatin River and aging potholes and i • Please [Slat to the toltowing Bob Poskin,
the Bull mountain area, but t bui hwa 9B near King P will also ext. 39
contact names and Plans Examiner
understand that I need to go to east of his y broken traffic signs olTigard's fist of
der the City numbers for the City o
aid rather than •;l, numb
the City of Tg City. . • coma un phone
ton County tot a build- codas tot Oach Tigard: BobThomP5On,
Washing ening7 . I The those building uiisdiction.: Ie famih
ing permit. What's haPP Builders in the etieCted areas t For griestions [elating t0 Plans Examiner (sing 35
t"
o areas are the same as I went to the Permit application e
in the city of Tigard, according who previously the building P arding POI'.
1'shappening is a teg- John , Rosenberger, offices for
o to the Giry process and/Of rag
A:Wha, to Director • Washington County .
Washington CountY's ortation.' ~ services will now go mils that have e not been issued, Mike Sheehan, inspector
utatory change 'called the
f Tigard's' ~p639A171, ext. 304. Senior Plumbing 'Tigard Transfer" 'n which
ext. 31
of Land use andTrans?nanages office. The city inspections,
rts ot u Per,
b at has . , • •
mitring tot some p And because the city paveloPment of nine call • 639For bui4 176. Wing this °
one sat of building ordinances, as approved the Kiting
corpotatad Washington county
tin, h le to handle the lnsPection
is being transferred to the City rather than several et theextra Steil POOP a 24-hour recorder. Mike Rudd, ermitting process must be received by 6 Senior Electrical inspector
Community are for the
requests
otligard. level, the P said Tigard's oasts
lasler;' an , • • ,ext. 351
whichwentinto ty d.easier, load, ment Director Jim nee
it they
this change. should be r•' ' , ; Develop y^~ r' t p e.., .
esuit of al , ,
sifect June 2, was the r ttected finder ~ Hendry>< "t1~~ ' ' '"'P day. Rosenbergarsa foltowing
id.;, • : eart!that,Bull Division, a Steele,
elloris by. .both entities that .`s• e gees.@, • , Does this' m , . For the Building Georg
p The : I niC'
Senior StructuraVMecha
started neatly t3 Years a9 • . ement are: Mountain' and?the' other areas 171. Individuals within
of the the,aew atran9 t etmits, ,and the, I calf 6394 can be reached .ext. 36.
idea was to take-soma bui}ding .,P ; , an`~tex9d r•, is ' a the division ca inspector • • •
bureeucrettG butdah oil of the r trlatl-,yut fere'b atdt No, although this
arses • inspections,. review: • ; o1?'g , r e future, directly:
county r; daveloprtient. -1 ssj• rli ty,k1:0 '„~h Jeanne Temp and letTigard, • . 16,
y. on the will of David Scott, ecialist 11
areas that are almost in the city aevelapme~► A,glg i'. 0 .,rig~~dependin8 p 00, rat ....oxt. 311 Administrative 'ext. 3u
Oa ` ro party owners. Building
limits. It also utd
as Bull Mountain inqes,'` - : •`services that wotit change
. tneettng se end P . ; ;
in areas BUCK ton eng r,,..r ) t:• ' `Qr18'thldg tee
having a~rµAyi'M• • .f 4
to make the 9 for the time being
iew, d
trip to H' is the Q„a,..ava+r .
from traffic rev
rllsbo . coda Onlorcement, an ci.: "
sla,
Tl)e transervices
i; r■_~y__..
r
a ale
-
L
-71
ll
RECI) JUN 24 1997
METRO
;ra
June 23, 1997 !I
Gordon S. Martin, Jr. I
12265 SW 72nd Avenue
J Tigard, OR 97223
Subject: Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Issues; h
Tigard Triangle
pear Gordon:
This letter summarizes and elaborates on the Metro staff comments made at our meeting
of June 2 regarding issues associated with implementation of the Urban Growth
Management Functional Plan (UGMFP) in the Tigard Triangle area. In the meeting and
in this letter, we are attempting to assist the parties in implementing the UGMFP. Our
] comments explain our approach to administering the UGMFP provisions. Resolutions of
a any disputes or application of specific provisions must be addressed by MPAC and the ! - -
Metro Council.
'r General Comments
As noted at the meeting, the authority for land use and transportation implementation
j actions within this area resides with the City of Tigard and with the Oregon Department
1 of Transportation (ODOT). The City has ultimate land use approval authority and
i both the City and ODOT have responsibility for the area's street and highway system.
We will be contacting them both to update them on our conclusions and clarifications,
identify any additional issues, and determine if additional action is necessary.
We also noted at the meeting that the UGMFP was intended as a set of interim measures l
to help begin implementing the Region 2040 Growth Concept. The UGMFP implements
the regional adoption of the 2040 Growth Concept by requiring local adoption of !
specific revisions to Comprehensive Plans and zoning and development codes. Further,
local elected officials, through MPAC, requested that Metro adopt the UGMFP
1 re^ nts. To that extent, the UG,v rP is not strictly a Metro document. It was
developed through consensus of all jurisdictions and the public. The UGMFP represents
a set of measures that are minimum standards. However, Metro staff would generally
support instances where local jurisdictions exceed the minimums where a public process
has determined it appropriate.
Finally, we also recognize that many of these requirements are new and do not have a
history of implementation techniques. We therefore expect a certain amount of
flexibility in meeting the letter of these requirements, while also expecting that the intent
of these requirements will be maintained.
i
l
- o
rw.F
i 1 Cordon Martin, Jr.
June 23, 1997
Page 2
Specific Comments
Following are our responses to specific comments and questions raised at the meeting.
1. Comment: The group asked for clarification as to the general intent, purpose, and
benefits of the Design Standards for Street Connectivity as required in Title 6, Section 3 of
the UGNfFP.
Response: The UGNIFP notes that the effectiveness of the regional
transportation system is impacted when local travel is restricted by a lack of
connecting routes. Local traffic is then forced onto the regional network. In
addition, the preliminary results of Metro's Street Design Study (currently
underway) show that street connectivity reduces vehicle miles of travel by providing direct routes to the collector and arterial system; and that additional j
connections are conducive to increased use of alternative modes (more direct
access to transit, walking and biking is less circuitous, etc.).
i 2. Comment: Public street rights-of-way and other development requirements j
{ (landscaping, sidewalks) will render the properties in the area undevelopable. [
Response: Metro staff noted at the meeting that we have supported the
1 concept of "skinny" streets in the past as one way to help maximize densities
j within developments and to avoid over-building streets where traditional rights-of-
way seem excessive. For example, the City of Portland allows rights-of-way as f
narrow as 46 feet in some areas. This is significantly less than normal minimum t
j M right-of-way requirements of 60 feet for local streets. We would support exploring r
Vy the option of skinny streets with the City of Tigard for streets internal to
commercial and/or mixed use developments within the Triangle.
s We also noted that pedestrian connections (primarily sidewalks) are required from
{ streets to building entryways under the Transportation Planning Rule. Those
connections should already be included in the developable land calculations.
Similarly, landscape requirements are generally the rule, not the exception within
most local codes, and have been for a number of years. Landscape requirements j
should also already be included in any developable land calculations and should
not be a surprise to most developers.
3. Comment Can "T" intersections be included as part of the 8 to 20 street `
[ connections per mile calculation (street connections at intervals no less than every 660
j feet)?
Response: We noted that the UG.:LIrP doe., not spc^fically address Uds
question. However, our preference is for full intersections in order to maximize
I traffic operations and safety. We also understand that circumstances may result
in a few partial connections'
onnections in certain areas. Whether the intersections are full or
i partial, we would expect the 8 to 20 standard to be met on both sides of a street
j where conditions allow. Title 6, Section 3.A.11-L and Section 3.B. describe the
situations where closed street systems may be necessary. These situations may
result due to topography, pre-existing development, barriers such as railroads or
freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams or riven.
l
1 I
Gordon Martin, Jr.
June :3, 1997
Page 3
i
4. Comment: Can private streets be included as part of the 8 to 20 street connections
per mile calculation?
Response: Public streets are the preference. However, private streets may be
allowed but should generally have the appearance of a public right of way and be
adequately constructed to accommodate the size and weight of vehicles common
to the street function and underlying zoning. By the term "appearance," the street
should include curb and sidewalk, appropriate lane markings, and should connect
with other private or public streets. To be counted, private streets must allow free
1 public access and circulation.
S• Comment What was intended by the term "local origin" under the Performance l '
Option of Title 6, Section 3.B.2? l
Response: As a set of minimum standards, Section 3.B2 was written for
residential areas or mixed use areas that include residential. It was understood
t that in those areas, buildings are set either at the street or at a short, insignificant °
distance back from the property line consistent with State Transportation Planning
i Rule requirements. There was no need to differentiate whether local origin was the i
property line or the front door. When drafted, this section was not written for
large commercial only land uses. As I stated at the meeting, if Metro staff were 1
i asked to re-draft the language for large commercial developments, we would likely
1 recommend that the front door be the point of local origin. With the front door
being the point of local origin, it would ensure a shortest path for pedestrians to a
designated collector or arterial street Any re-draft of the UGMFP would require
MPAC and Metro Council action
I hope this letter helps you and the meeting participants better understand our
Functional Plan and will help facilitate the process for development in the Tigard
Triangle. As we agreed, I would appreciate you circulating this letter to the other non- 1
y staff meeting participants. If you have questions or if I may be of further help, please
call me at 797-1743.
Sincerely,
G
4 /-Xc~
Michael Hoglund
1 Transportation Planning Manager
' cc Tom Kloster
Mary Weber
5 Larry Shaw
Leo Huff, ODOT
Jim Hendryx, City of Tigard
a '
y _
i
j
y
~~o
e' NL IENIORANDUi41
CITY OF TIGARD j
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: William A. Monahan, City Manager
I -
DATE: July 2, 1997
SUBJECT: Arbor Heights Update
The Arbor Heights Apartment complex is progressing well. Area residents are continuing to
raise questions of when construction will be complete, units occupied, 109th open at the top of
the hill, and other conditions met. I expect that once the units are occupied and traffic is
generated to and from the apartments, calls and questions will be a daily occurrence.
Staff will provide regular updates of the status. At this time, we know:
> According to the Planning Division, two-thirds of the site appears to have at
least two months of work (at a minimum) to complete before occupying.
> The other one-third is close to ready for occupying, but no Certificate of
Occupancy has been issued.
> Street improvements and utilities are nearly complete. ,
A copy of Mark Roberts' summary memo is attached, as well as a letter responding to issues
raised by Marge Davenport, a neighbor who has consistently expressed concern about this
project for years.
An issue of stop signs has also been raised. A copy of Walter Cosgrave's letter is attached.
Engineering is reviewing the issue now.
WAM\jh
attachment
Oadm\bWN,0297.1 Ldoc
i
J
;i
June 24,1997 CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
Marge Davenport
15100 SW 109th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
j RE: 109th Concerns
Dear Ms. Davenport:
This is in response to your letter received May 28, 1997 regarding concerns about 109th Avenue. j
SW Royalty Parkway through Arbor Heights is classified as a minor collector street and is'
therefore required to meet the following design parameters:
• Right-of-way: 60 feet
• Paved Width: 40 feet
• Grade of street: 12% maximum _
• Centerline Radius in Curves: 166 feet (25 MPH design speed)
The design that was approved by the City met all of the above standards, as well as the criteria in
our public improvement design standards. There are portions of the meet that are at 12% grade,
but the majority of the roadway is between 8% and 100/6. The relatively steep grades in this
3 street are not unusual for developments that are situated along a hillside. The major curve in the
' section where Old 109th Avenue transitions into the new Royalty Parkway has a centerline
radius of 185 feet, which exceeds the minimum standard. The roadway does have a posted speed
Ij limit of 25 MPH.
i
s'. Connectivity throughout the City for better distribution of traffic is becoming increasingly
important. Tigard's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map indicates that Royalty Parkway is
to be extended as designed to tie into SW 109th Avenue. The Arbor Heights plan accomplishes i
our Comprehensive Plan requirements.
Our traffic calming efforts are now primarily focused on the installation of speed humps *.o
reduce traffic speeds through residential neighborhoods. Properly designed and constructed speed
humps do reduce speeds through a neighborhood We typically would install these humps in
local residential streets and minor collectors. While 109th Avenue through Arbor Heights is a
minor collector and has a posted speed limit of 25 MPH, it does not qualify for speed hump
installation. Speed humps installed on sharp curves or on grades greater than 8% would create
safety hazards that outweigh any benefits derived from the humps. As I mentioned earlier, the
grades on the roadway range between 8% to 12%. Enclosed for your information is the extensive
criteria we now follow for rating the streets that need speed humps. This criteria has evolved over
13125 SW Hcll Blvd., Tigcrd, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
J
the past few years as the demand for speed humps has drastically increased. With residents of
over 50 segments of streets in Tigard expressing strong interest in the program, there is now
terrific competition among the neighborhoods for inclusion in the City-funded portion of the
program.
I have discussed your concerns with the Chief of Police, Ron Goodpaster. He has not received
any complaints from this area, speeding or otherwise. If you observe any such problems
occurring in that area, please give him a call. He is willing to initiate speed limit enforcement in
that area if it can be shown that there is a problem along that stretch of road.
rj In summary, the roadway design of SW Royalty Parkway meets our minimum design standards
! and the connection of that street to SW 109th Avenue was accomplished to satisfy the provisions
of our Transportation Plan Map. Speed hump installation is not a viable option along that steep i
stretch of road. Speed limit enforcement may be one method to curb speeding in that area. !
1
If you have any questions on the road design or on the speed hump program, please call me.
Sincerely,
USTIN P. DUENAS, P.E.
AML
C Engineer
Enclosure
c: Bill Monahan, City Manager
Liz Newton, Assistant to the City Manager
_ Ron Goodpaster, Chief of Police
Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer
Mike Mills, Senior Construction Inspector
z 11ENG%GUSU.ETTERS%109DAVEN.DOC
ec. Letter to Marge Davenport Regarding 109th Concerns
Page 3
x
tfF
HAY MV9
del
Ti__ard City Council & City manager
Tigard, OR 97223 Re: 109th concerns ~
Sirs:
Please thank Liz Newton for her concilitary letter. She was misin-
a formed on one thins.-when plannerslenLrrineers told her thev had ! r.
consulted with "Neighbors"-that is not true. I am the only "nei__hbor".
on 109th, and 1 was not consulted! This could be another example of
my complaint about the lack of concern of these staffs for citizens.
Another concern about 109th: The kids have already discovered the
joy of racing down the hill and seeing how fast they can snake the new
and dangerous corner as the street goes into Arbor Heights develop- l '
r ment. In conversation with Arbor Heil-hts Devlopment manager
Nlike, he has expressed concern about the potential danger opening
this street will create. Manv cars will be leaving the apartment corn- `
? plea onto 109th, and entering with many left turns (both ways) and no I
center rum lanes.
In addition to the hazard of the sharp turn (if they miss they will shoot
off into space, if they don 7t crash into a car coming up the hill,) the
potential for interserion accidents at the apartment entrances (and also
for me) is great. The Ciry Council, in all its wisdom, would be pru-
dent to lease 109th closed at the top to avoid killing people!
j If staff can convince them this is not a viable solution-then speed '
i buntos should be authorized. and speed posted at 20 or (of course -
this can't be enforced.)
As an on-site observer, I kttow• that 109th has always been a challenge
to motorcycle riders, beefed up pick-up drivers and others who are
them an even grater
testing something. If it is opened, it will off..
oeoornmirv "to really set a rood tun at it!"
Thank you foS_.your consideration of these maters.
'Manse Davenoort
1:100 SW 109th. Tigard. OR 97224. 639- o3 7
COSGRAVE. VERGEER S. KESTER. L. L. P.
ArroRNCY3 Ar LAW
wu.i. ! •C3rCw Sulr[ 13co .nOwCw • •e»wnf
_3lar.v[ ..1r1c[n .w 1•~'
•Cw + l-cc. 3.w. O. .r [wIC. TIn.r1C1.~ C[nr[w
+ ..•aClCn•• IZI W rOwwlfOn Srwt [T cn1.1311nc It.
r1f.l,[w
i ~w
"a f•GCnc wuC+~C •c.. 1 J..6cwc.
wr suc Powrowwo. Owcoon 9720+•310
woo~s•
son rcf.cw-ancv o31323•-73+cnor- r.
• • - [wOww ' wff,4f.r O. 610
3.. ,.f~111.r9 ..1f O]I ]l]••OIw
.c'--cr • lawmen ou.wc vcoacc•
••.wlcs~•..ec. waccl.1•r.a WI.C
fra.-. w.cr.w Iu~.1~.0
s;~ vlcn.ct G IC'wlan[
vow... a ro11w.3• war 1. Mse-.66-
wOCnw -
..coc..c
••.•w r....w uu•e.-r M. 11033•1lb9.1
June 27, 1997 ALFA
Mw ...wi..aw •e.
L.. Firm
Mr.~lgustin P. Duenas, P.E.
City "$a_gineer
City o igard, Oregon
13125 SW all Blvd.
Tigard, O 97223 .
Dear Sir:
This will confirm my comments to Mr. Rager several weeks
ago, at which time I requested that consideration be given to
installing stop signs on S.W. Royalty Parkway where it intersects
with S.W. Naeve St. in order to minimize the danger of serious
- injury at that location. As you know, stop signs have been
installed on Naeve at that intersection. Mr. Rager suggested
"that I direct my request to you.
Because of the restricted angles of the northeast and !
southwest corners, because of the slope of Royalty from north to tf
south and, because of the curve of Royalty to both the north and 1
the south, this intersection presents a hazardous situation for t
those crossing or entering Royalty from Naeve St. It is realized
that Royalty was designed to carry the expected flow of traffic
from the high-density apartment area to the north. However,
Naeve St. is an important route for Summerfield area residents, t
many of whom are older citizens with restricted peripheral
vision, and for many other motorists. Traffic at this
intersection will become much heavier, too heavy to be safely
a managed by stop signs only on Naeve. It is also realized that we j.
cannot have stop signs on every corner, but this is a unlcrae _
situation of which you would not have been aware at the time the
plans were developed.
A The writer has no qualifications as a traffic engineer; but,
based upon rather extensive experience in the handling of
litigation involving injuries and deaths arising from
intersection accidents and, based upon my own daily use of
69447_1--
a~
Mr. Agustin P. Duenas, P.E.
June 27, 1997
Page 2
Naeve St., it appears to me that, until stop signs are placed on
Royalty, a real danger exists at this intersection. Fast-moving
southbound vehicles on the rather steep down slope of Royalty are
already a hazard. Other respected Summerfield residents have
indicated that they share this concern.
The adding of stop signs on Royalty Parkway (at little cost
and with minimal inconvenience for drivers using Royalty) would,
I think, also protect the city from claims that it did not
correct this hazard. Although a public body is generally immune
from liability based upon discretionary acts (such as the design
and signalizing of intersections), it is my understanding of the { 5
law that a public body and its officials may be held liable for
failure to correct a situation which is shown to be dangerous. j
See Little v Wiamier, at al, 303 OR 580, 739 )2 564 (1987) in
which the Oregon Supreme Court held that the state could be found
liable for failing to correct an intersection danger by
additional proper signs or controls.
I would be happy to discuss this matter with you if you
should desire.
I take this opportunity to commend all of those responsible
for the administration of the affairs of the City of Tigard for
What I consider to be a truly admirable job.
Very truly yours,
r,
Walter J. Cosgrave
WJC:sad
cc: Paul Hunt
Mr. Donald Pinkerton, President,
Summerfield Civic Association
Mr. Brian Rager
49447-1
i4
L~
.J
MEMORANDU vI
i
CITY OF TIGARD
r~
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: William A. Monahan, City Manager
DATE: July 2, 1997
SUBJECT: My Vacation Plans
Over the summer I plan to take some vacation days. In each case, Liz Newton will be
working and available. i
The days I will be gone are as follows:
aj
? Wednesday, July 16 = -
Thursday and Friday, July 24 and 25
Wednesday through Tuesday, August 27 to September 2
I will be out of town July 24 through July 27, and August 29 through September 1.
I may take additional days off; again, making sure that Liz will be available.
M1 r
The ICMA conference is in Vancouver, British Columbia from Saturday, September 13
through the 17th. I plan to drive up on the 13th, and returning the evening of the 17th.
,
My family and I are also planning a winter week to ten day trip. Originally we were planning
for the first week of November, but the Dolan case has been scheduled for that week. I will
be monitoring the Dolan schedule and making plans over the next few months. I will keep
you advised.
WAM\jh „
12dm\biM(T70297-3.doc
i
r
1
cife
a • ®
I
l
June 26, 1997
The End is Near
From all appearances, the 1997 Legislative Session is drawing to a close. Few committees are meeting;
long lists of bills face each House for floor sessions and people are actually discussing what they intend to
do after session. As usual, though, significant issues for city officials remain to be decided. Legislators
must still complete final action on bills to implement Ballot Measure 50, the $1 billion transportation
package, and more tax breaks for business.
House and Senate leaders have been meeting as a'super-committee' trying to agree on final budget
numbers, while a smaller *supergroup' considers the transportation package. In both cases, the
differences don't appear to have changed significantly. The House and Senate remain several million
dollars apart on the K-12 education budget and the Oregon Health Plan, with the House seeking the
higher figures. The flexible funding in the transportation package continues to be the sticking point in an
agreement between the House, Senate, and Governor John Krtzhaber. If this issue is not resolved in
some manner over the next few days, it is likely that legislators will either adopt a 'maintenance only- -
proposal or simply walk away from the issue completely. In neither case will they have done their job.
Wen legislators do finally adjourn, city officials wanting to know the fate of a particular issue will have a
difficult time finding League lobby staff for a few days. It is our intent to come back to the office within a
few days of adjournment to send out a final Bulletin. We will, as usual, be producing our "Summary of the
1997 Legislative Session' and touring the state in the Fall to discuss the changes you will face in
operating your city.
To all of you who walked out of meetings to take our phone calls, who got home late because you were at
the office gathering data for us, or who got out of bed at ridiculous hours to drive to Salem to testify,
Thank You! Your energy and commitment kept us going!
i
INSIDE
Measure so 2
Call Your Legislator' S81137 2
Transportation Funding Package 2
ISSUe Pave # SJR 27 _ 3
EDD Budget 3 -
Transportation 2 Intangibles . 3
SIR 27 3 Franchise / Right-of-Way 3
EDD Budget 3 Electricity Industry Restnreturing Bill 4
Intangibles 3 Sanitarian Registration 5
Fish Passage 5
Week in Review 5
Publ6hed meelrly by the league of vregon Cities. _ ubscriptian fee: 820.00
L`C Information Line: (503) 528-6550: (800) -1.52-0333 toll-free: Fa_c (503) 399-k'63: E-mail locCdotlocalgov.org
Le:islati,r Bill Information: (503) 086-1150: (800) 352-2313 .14-frca: lntcnct bttp /,ww.1N.state.or.us
Old
Measure 50 permits and related permits would have to be taken
within 30 or 60 days of receiving a completed
Early this week, the Senate approved HB 3710 as application. If the jurisdiction denies the application or
passed by the House. It would add a supplemental fails to take action within the deadlines, the applicant
reduction on levies that had not previously been could petition the circuit court for a writ of mandamus to
reduced. This bill also would impose Measure 5 limits compel the municipality to issue the approval. A third
on a property by property basis, rather than on the tax party plans review and inspection system would be
code basis language derived from the language of developed under the pilot, with the idea that if a
Measure 50 itself, and would reset the maximum jurisdiction is too busy, the work can be sent to the third
assessed valuation if it went below real market value at party for review. These plans reviewers would have no
any time. The League did not support this version of deadlines to meet The House Rules Committee,
the bill. chaired by Representative Lynn Snodgrass (R-Baring),
is expected to consider the annexation amendment
In other action, the Senate and House Revenue sometime Thursday afternoon. If approved by the
committees began slogging their way through final Committee, SB 500 will go to the House floor and then
implementing bills (SB 1215 and HB 2048, back to the Senate for concurrence with House
respectively), focusing on urban renewal, various amendments.
'anomalies' in the allocation formula specific to the
cities of Gresham, Heppner, and Hillsboro,
administration of the double majority provisions, and Transportation Funding Package
other technical corrections. Both committees are Lives
hoping to complete their efforts early next week
Despite two weeks of intense political maneuvering
which saw the House pass and the Senate defeat, HB
Night of the (Living Dead 3163, transportation funding package. the prospects for
the passage of a transportation funding package
In a session which has seen dead bills rise. Dracula- remain alive. The House, Senate and Governor
like, from their graves, the question of city-wide votes appear to be game to take another run at a package. A
on proposed annexations continues to lurk in the Group comprised of Representative Lee Beyer (D-
Legislature. SB 1137, which would have imposed a Springfield), Representative Tom Brian (R-Tigard),
two-year moratorium on the adoption of new local Representative Mike Lehman (D-Coos Bay) and Rep -
voting requirements, died in the House Transportation Bob Montgomery (R-Cascade Locks) has been
Committee, chaired by Representative Bob meeting with Senator Ken Baker (R-Clackamas) and
Montgomery (R-Cascade Loch) two weeks ago. The Senator Joan Dukes (D-Astoria) to assemble a new
controversial bill, supported by the League, would have funding bill. Their challenge is to develop a package
protected the integrity of the charter amendments that meets the conflicting requirements of the House,
previously adopted in seven cities. The Oregon Senate and the Governor and is further complicated by
Building Industry and the Association of Oregon needing a near equal number of Democrats and i
Retailers have crafted amendments which they hope Republicans to reach the three-fifths vote needed for
will prevent'mis-use' of the annexation votes. This passage.
language would authorize LCDC to impose an
'enforcement order" against cities which demonstrate a There is a consensus developing around the core
'pattern and practice' of violating state land use elements of the package: a six cent increase (2+2+2
requirements in the exercise of their annexation phased in this biennium); a $10 a year ($20 biennium)
authority. registration increase and adding several elements to
increase ODOTs accountability. Additional elements
Proponents hope to "stuff' this language into SB 500, a that were in both the House and Senate Bills such as:
bill which originally related to local government rule doubling the Special City Allotment Program; the high-
adoption procedures, and which was first amended in growth-county additional registration increase; $3
the Senate to allow local government employees to million to offset federal forest cutbacks; and the
select from additional deferred compensation increases in aviation fuel taxes have so far remained
investment options. This bill, however, has become so intact
richly festooned with unacceptable amendments to the
local building code process that both League and One major new component under discussion is the
Association of Oregon County officials are considering creation of a Transportation Reinvestment Account to
a request that the governor veto the bill. Under the capture additional income tax generated from
latest proposed amendments, a pilot program would be transportation expenditures. This new fund would
established for building inspection programs in replace the fee on phone or income tax that was in past
Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington counties. bills and be used to support elderly and disabled
Final action on single-.amity and certain multi-family transportation, high speed rail and other transportation
Page 2 League of Oregon Cities Legislative Bulletin /June 26, 1997
L J
J
t Projects needing flexible funds. A flexible funding are consolidated into the Oregon Community
mechanism is essential in obtaining support of the Development Program. Under the plan developed by
Democrats but has reduced support among legislative leadership, all of the programs have to
Republicans especially in the Senate. Finessing this compete for limited funds during 1997-99. Some
impasse is the trick to passing the package. programs were held harmless, including the Arts
Commission, Tourism, and Film and Video. Also,
04 e trucking industry along with Associated Industries minimal reductions were made in the Director's Office.
Of Oregon and other business groups are now During the interim, a work group will review EDO's
advocating a package developed by Senator Marilyn programs and make recommendations to the
Shannon (R-Salem), that includes a four cent gas tax Emergency Board after the one-year process.
increase with a break in taxes for trucks and earmarks
the entire increase to cities and counties. Their LOC would like to thank all city officials who have
than package does the would actually yield less for local government responded to the Action Alerts and encourage you
package being developed by the group to continue contacting legislators in sup on rt ci
of legislators. Senator Shannon's proposal provides adding up to a total of 511 million in additional
zero funding for maintenance or new projects on state funds to EDD's budget 1S6 55101 for the Special
roads. Public Works Fund. Water Fund. Rural Investment
Call your legislators with the message: Fund. and Regional Strategies to replace the cuts
made by the Joint Ways and Means Commfttee.
TRANSPORTATION FUNDING: DON'T COME HOME
WITHOUT rn
Intangibles - House Battle Looms
SJR 27 The House is expected to take up HB 2062, to exempt
intangible personal property from taxation for centrally
Although the House Transportation Committee, chaired
by Representative Bob Montgomery (R-Cascade assessed utilities, on Thursday. The League is
Locks), had a hearing on SJR 27, the bill which would strongly apposed to this bill Readers should urge
refer to the voters a constitutional amendment to repeal their legislators to oppose this bill, which would
the 50°6 tumour requirement no further action has cost local governments a minimum of $10 million
~~,~gen scheduled. The Senate has already approved in additional tax revenues, and conceivably
considerably more.
is measure. Readers are urged to contact their
members to support this Measure. House The vote is expected to be extremely close.
Transportation Committee members are Montgomery,
Lehman, Harper, Josi, Lokan, Roberts, Wells.
Franchise and Right-of-Way
Authority Upheld -Flo Legislative
EDD Budget Lingers on Senate Solution for Electric and Gas Pilot
Floor Programs
EDO's budget (SB 5501) remains on the Senate floor, On Thursday, June 12, the House Commerce
while AOC and LOC work with rural legislators in an Committee considered, but rejected, a *gut and stuff of
attempt to add 56 -12 million back to the budget HB 3500 (previously HB 2060). Committee Chair
While there appears to be agreement from the Eldon Johnson (R-Central Point) proposed two
Governors office and legislative leadership to add back conceptual amendments - one would have required all
$6 million, LOC and ACC are seeking an additional 56 franchise fees (on telephone, electricity, and natural
million to ensure that infrastructure programs are gas) to be fully passed through to pity residents only
adequately funded during 1997-99., and the other would have required the fees to be
shown, in full, on city customer's bills. Although there
was some support for the proposal, the majority of the
Several weeks ago, the Joint Ways and Means Committee could not support the proposed
Committee cut 513 million from the Governor's 1997-99 amendments.
recommended budget for EDD; all of the cuts were
made to infrastructure programs that assist small Representative Tom Whelan (D Salem),
-ommunities. This includes the Special Public Works Representative Richard Devlin (D-Lake Oswego),
~.)und, the Water Fund, Rural Investment Fund, and Representative Ron Adams (R-West Linn), and
regional strategies. All EDD grant and loan programs Representative Cynthia Wooten (D-Eugene) were the
League of Oregon Cities Legislative Bulletin /June 26, 1997 Page s
t
most vocal in expressing their concerns about the In the absence of legislative direction, Welsh stated
rationale for the proposals, questions about their that electric utilities now will play the largest role in
expected impacts, and opposition to their adoption. helping to shape a competitive retail electricity market
Following these comments. Chair Johnson withdrew in Oregon. It was pointed out that with the merger of
his proposal and closed the work session on HB 3500. Portland General Electric and Enron, a tariff will be filed
That action prevented consideration of amendments within several months to create an open, competitive
sponsored by the League, Portland General Electric, market in their territory, which includes forty percent of
and some large industrial customers to address Oregon's population.
franchise fees under future 'direct access' pilot
programs of electric and natural gas utilities. In Calling HB 2821 a'model bill,' Welsh and Wooten said
response to a request from Committee Vice-Chair they will work with the United Consumers group to build
Wooten for these amendments to be considered. Chair understanding and support for future legislation. In its
Johnson stated that he believed these amendments to final form, the bill reflected a compromise which two
be 'illegal" and refused to consider them. coalitions, the Oregon Energy Coalition and the Fair
and Clean Energy Coalition, had largely crafted.
Since the Commerce Committee has now closed, with Oregon Energy Coalition members are: Associated
both HS 3500 and HB 2060 'inside,' it is highly unlikely Oregon Industries, Industrial Customers of Northwest
that legislation to reduce utility franchise fees and local Utilities, Northwest Pulp and Paper Association,
right-of-way will be passed this session. Oregon Retail Council, Oregon Restaurant Association,
and Oregon Grocery Industry Association. The Fair
With the closure of the Commerce Bad Power and Clean Energy Coalition includes a long list of public
Deregulation Committees, and the reluctance of interest groups, such as the Citizens Utility Board,
legislators to pass any electricity industry restructuring American Association of Retired Persons, Northwest
proposals this session, it also is unlikely that legislation Conservation Act Coalition, Northwest Renewables
addressing franchise fees under pilot programs will be Project, League of Women Voters, Oregon
considered. The League expects discussion of Environmental Council, Oregon State Public Interest
franchise fees under pilots and other direct access Research Group, and numerous groups representing
arrangements to continue as electric and gas utilities low-income households. Also supporting the
file proposals with the Oregon Public Utility 'consumers' bill were the Eugene Water and Electric
Commission for approval. "Keeping cities whole' once Board and the City of Portland.
again will be the message from the League. -
Bringing members of the United Consumers together
were 1) the desire on the part of large industrial and
No Power Left for Electricity commercial customers to get early direct access to
Industry Restructuring Bill electricity suppliers ; 2) the desire of public interest
ry 9 groups to protect small customers, continue public
As meeting after meeting of the House Power purposes, and to assure Oregonians of long-term
g 9 access to Bonneville Power Administration cost-based
Deregulation Committee was canceled in early June by power. At the press conference, several
the Chair of the Committee, Representative Jim Welsh representatives spoke about the need for a framework
(R-Elmira), it became apparent that there were not as restructuring begins, clear rules in advance, and
sufficient votes to get an electricity industry assurances that all classes of customers would benefit
restructuring bill passed this session. On Monday,
June 9, Welsh and Representative Cynthia Wooten (0. Welsh described HB 2821 as legislation that met
Eugene), Committee Vice-chair, conducted a press principles laid out by Governor Kitzhaber, followed
conference with members of the United Consumers for outlines of the Northwest Comprehensive Review; set
Oregon Consumer Choice to discuss the demise of HB realistic dates for open retail access, including pilot
2821. programs; established consumer protections, including
a rate cap to avoid cost shifts; continued investments in
Welsh and Wooten, both strong supporters of HB 2821, energy conservation, renewable energy resources and
said that heavy opposition and effective lobbying by low-income energy services; and allowed, but did not
electric utilities kept the proposed legislation from guarantee, recovery of past uneconomic investments
moving this year. Welsh noted that he discarded the for utilities.
idea of passing a 'study' bill this session after he was
persuaded that more study will not produce any more Franchise fee language, which had been drafted by the
consensus. 'The policy choices are clear. What is League and some of the large industrial customers,
needed are decisions by polio makers,' he said. also was in HS 2821. Although the League supported
the franchise fee section, no position was taken on the r.
overall proposal. b„o+
Page 4 League of Oregon Cities LegWatrve Bufeao /June 26, 1997 ~
i
Exemptions for Sanitarian Week in Review
Registration
Bills proposed by the Oregon Building Officials
SB 185 passed the full House and Senate. The bill Association (OBOA) have passed both Houses, but
- amended at the request of LOC to exempt any 1 not without some changes and bumps along the
person employed by a local government, or its agents, way. SB 822 provides a more expeditfou3;7.*.; 1t~y
.(.While employed in a job that did not require registration application process for various Cufldlno in~oeceor
as a sanitarian as at the effective date of the legislation and some flejdbi in eiecttk a . L
qualifications-',Language incttsding'*•r
y!,"The purpose of the amendment is to prevent the Inspector
= Sanitarian Board from expanding their rules to require- plumbing cerflficatlons was deleted iri the Sew to 1 .
kcal government employees, whose jobs do not and on June 19, the House passed ftie?
g Engrossed-version, 53-2.1SB 824 which
wren ortginafly
tly require them to be areistered sanitarian,
from having to register with the Sanitarian Board. The was proposed to allow ktcal jurisdictions to raiser.
rttecttanicalf structural, and One and Two Famii'y
, . . F
hill also exempts staff of the Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) from the requirements of Dwel 64 Code uildi& pFrmit f!£3 VyittlOUt see
1 `'.the Sanitarian Registration Board. with the`excapdon of.~ > nO
the the Sew bQ Inchrd~ a eR
-Was y? i'staff who work in the sub-surface sewage program
process` to BCD when increase tees are
increased;.
appirnred and to require that it fees are
; use~L for the id Is
qly
Z-4: ter;.
Conference Committee.. Reaches - entorceinnt of the codes ber°
Agreement on Fish, Passage the"ttousecoR,rr,er~ecomRtit _
~j ra,.....r^_ - . ?pw n- added from SB 823 which assure that.13
j A conference committee on House Bill 2607 reached Nrisdicfior rrie}( review a'master plan' for ktca an
agreement on the bilt. The Senate has approved the fc site-specific requirements andcharge ^adequa4e'`
°`'aonteience committee report; it now needs to be fees for the kicai review:;- chTriers Prr'ovtsioQs were
c'• a_.~... ed by the House.;. HB.2607 addresses ~ ' k>~iifed w'hers SB 823 yira~ -
passage requirements for'new, &3,e, 4 sting
dairts:and :c e'+dr e~ e
`N`eptaces. special legislation for two spedfic'projects ~:,cr the'Ue~n a empcertaat
':-MdtOown Hill in Douglas County: aril the Joe Ney`lUpper by an arct'uEecf•-or engineer from p(an -
oriy Creek Expansion Project in Coas_BajrMorth':'' "Fthe (-false passed SB 824; 8-Engrossedy9&13, the`X r'
cf`ertx~l~^-The bill includes atwo-year viraivef fro_ rrr~awsting' • _ `.Senate at furl refiised'to coircui in'the Hoes
1eyk_ f-S j ts'` ^~aa~eerldnl but Upon fOr-
'f° 7}1' 'tfie:b'199onre25.
ttauthorizes the State Fish and Wildlife Canvnission to ` ~ :^`.h
ender into a memorandum of understanding to waive ^y r SB 932 passedlhe tuft House thrs weekAThe bt71;
the frshway requirements, 'rf the Commission : - - s _ ;which is sponsored by Senato Ted Fe.mofi (Rlohn
i ~deterinsnes after pub)-tc review-and comment ttsarl - ~ • ~Y) wine the Ecoriornre ~ - .
a~tetnative mitigation proposed by ~e proms owner oc De~artmertt"(EDDl to give oiioif~i to cd~•~ties"""
a;~: operator woukf provide a net benefd loo wt7d`'~:~=~~ -R = av~nitie-s or otheraeooranhic areas'aie_ = -
-anadramori w and other migratory irative @sh; and; 2y as°d'>sfressed areas'b eEDDrbased on %
the proponent of the attemative mitigation submits a zr;'`',''5 $ix;tr as unemokrvmertt'rate: poverty rate
memorandum of understanding for approval by the _ • - D& Capita income: EDO will work withlitate ; : `
:.•.Y `w agencies in defuiiri distressed areas:.
Coirunission by January 1, 1999.-. HB 2607 a and local
lso.i~'..~• ; s i 8'..,~ w
fi requires the Director of State Fish and V11iidrrfe
convene a fish passage task force to develop - SB 1027, a proposal from the Oregon Burldina
re-mmtindations, which shall include alternative Industry Association to establish a pilot program for
mitigation requirements, for submittal to the Legislature 'master builders.' was passed by the House, 43-7,
in 1999- The recommendations prepared by the task on June 19- As amended in the Senate, the bin
force shat include suggested legislative changes authorizes a pilot program in only two jtirLsdictions j
necessary to improve the benefits to fish resulting from and directs the Department of Consumer and
fish passage, fishways, and alternative mitigation Business Services (DCBS) to adopt rules for the
requirements. Program, Under the pilot a building official Could
:a, . : Y- : •y -'waive certain inspection requirements for'niiaster
but5ders.' The bill also directs DCBS to adopt a
priority schedule for one and two family inspections
and plan review requirements. ;
(Continued on next page)
. League of Oregon Cider Legisle6ve Bu6emri % June 26, • 1997 r - - - - - _ - . .I~ - _ ` - • Y c +`'K'' Pa a 5 • is
'Fists- rA._.: ~rk:lT°Ht2r s,=..:'Y:.•>; _.f.. ,-.~..'rC :~:cy '~'i: ct'`W JG~' 'r ,-g`v'i
I
T i
.~~s'r:{ji rr-r,• '1~(y~, •^.a ;4''h• r 41 'Lr riaK.' r a f1~1
,9 i l.r`.>r„~'~-~~1\ f ~~;~i} r 2 ~'a('~}~`J"}t ~1 SF~ r'`r+„s~~~, ~.'A a. 1 ,,f~ r`,~i(1~ ~1 ••1~1/ "j}-~J ~i',t. ~ • ~
'7l €t F 1, 0 1
1•f'1 I 1 ti. a rtJ1Y. '.R", i 4 , ~S :L, 1 , .f.? U~'
~I ~ :'!}AK.Y 1 "r~.:±!l.. y~ M~.`e'f' r 'v i'~r1~ r, (~y s ~ ••riC'M
o v, ~,1 'l~r*,, ~r;s.~C:? • ,~i~~1rf,'r.•;~ r ~%~1 I ti" *s, n'{j;,s;.,;~j'ti• Q . ~ N -,r•'d'•.
r~~ 11/. O c: •1~,;'() ~ a~{.~aY~i~a ba3''" A{'1:~r~ ~t~7r1 r~~. • 7 f 1~ Ti i~ r 1 ~ N ~J ~ ~n{I,~'r
'4
.P 1•c YY t 4 ~ r ' t~: • ` ~ ; '1Vj'r s9;r ~J ip _ ..}}~~jj 1- b JJ77 Via'
_~yjr • 'aa `~1, ,'t.~,-ip` f• ~ ' "~~y/ ~~,3x~+: _ i ~..tr,?T4.,;y~'R ;:~G K'~'.':..~ ~m~~~~ g ~ (~]5~•:
o r" { 13 r• K.:, t~T,H ~`.9 ~a 4r'
~1 ti 1' l~ '1:. '.l. 1. ,~1, t i.:v :r 'f. 1': .s f. ~I k cl awe
a :~•L {a, 4b'.~ 'i' Z ir'k' ••'~:'r:.4•': ',i 'lJ. y m Cr, 1. ~dj 9 .R
• H . ~ r= Y` fi • rte"
,7 - .r, it''•.la~Ls o~ •rl• pe',17: $
.s ir,. ;;f tr .`fit r~ar .,1j .4 1• 61~ ~ ''•f' ~T: .•.Jn
}•rt;` ttd I~ ^J!; s~ C _ r
;)111) ISlll L., fi
' ti::'.. i • . v , /r'. '~4[r 'i•; m qt 'S p~ bOI 4
.1111151111 -'t" ' : i y;•, }i' 5 u~t rj d ~~ti t b A3
m c Uj 42 Y
a:' •'i~ a~p:• 1.-~ I~t~l 1: y ~ to m ~ k.
51
I•• 'i u~' `(~y*'',:.~9• r 1,•'t,: ••~'~7{y i•,••, O.SU s~.C Cl =r0. J
il` ~ A`•~, t~j1f .rti ~r;41a.'~iC~,7•f! ~ dP' ry EI 1~;•s,'•'::7,'~` w''1 ''L.r•u`;'' ~ ~ ~
• ~ j' rr t r• ;•.KS' 11,1 ~ S•' F. ''•F2S'y'u[~~'r,~r , I j i•, d t ~ ~ r
1. 4` + : : f r ht.v et(:;.'it r ms t~'Y!' 1 i
1 , f _ zS tl j ~ ~~t, 1,, t,1. s i ri 1L~j , • ' ~ v
ct:
ai_
yr ~ tr ~ ~{,~{~}j N ~Q1{ ~ 5 .11'
} irE s. `s.., s , ',l u t{ '•dH C13
3:~' >;~s C'' rt;.:;: ~,g SS i5 a.~ Ll
-1 F,
4 3z; r., m
i • r., 1''SSMMII >rc. ~1 ! , ~f ; 4,+ - c ai ~6 ? CY]
ryl aq~rl. ~Irt.t~;` S, }~'•ly~`F~ , E 10 ~a•~~~E~~i.
In i r~i ,lti(f~, {r,. i~~.~v ii tm GC E'c +66xx~11 8 4 ~L
U N -aa. 11 r~'. 1 '.j S• ;'1~ h 111. W r C 2
t~~'{~, 11 •'~li t ,~yt~~~; GG p..l O
71Dt,
p O Obi a''';~ t;:' j.; 'f~:'iN,~ ;~,~t~ - o m L ~ • B o ~ l' ~ v _ I
00
N
0a. . ~ ~%r~ ~~•1, i• Il y ~ lV174~~ ~ c ~Ej?,yC
N CS j • .•i tC'<Y,1 't'".a. ,ir .~-a . « ..dt. ;4d. '^:;ti..' F f.Y~ •sa I O C F-
~ ~ r ~ r • ti.~' +'t,^~.''~'i'~'~ij;..~,-}% f.{: ~y~ r ( i".~."r~. ~ y~# v^r' 1•,t~ (ri1~~;lUl.pN, r;7s•~.1t ;'Ni~~~.
cli
d r ' A? a 1 141'0: (a: S~''•1.. _ Z Ti'l~ ` . ! • Y 1 '~f. !i j.l I ,i ' i . i ,
l
J7Gl- ~s~l~ ~ -
Id y-2 o 7033 Cam,) a`
40,
}
i
.1
1
7771
49-encla 64c4,
July 7, 1997
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
Dear Council Members,
I am unable to attend your council meeting of July 8, which I believe will hear
public testimony regarding S.W. North Dakota St. traffic, so I thought I would
send this note..
I have lived on North Dakota St. for 29 years, and have experienced the increase in
traffic. It is difficult to get out of my driveway, and without sidewalks the street is j.
dangerous. I support your efforts to use speed bumps or other means to at least
keep the heavy traffic at a safe speed. The part of North Dakota St. east of 121st
1 street, along with many other streets in Tigard all have increased traffic and
deserve your attention.
' I do not understand why the group of people on the west side of 121st have
received so much publicity. They already have sidewalks and islands which makes
their street safer than many others. And besides, the islands were put their to slow
traffic not be gardens. It seems the time and attention that these folks have
demanded from the council is extensive. Any idea of closing the street, or rerouting
traffic seems to be very selfish to other residents who would receive the traffic.
These same people who complain must remember they drive down streets other I
y people live on.
Should we all say no traffic on our street? E
Sincerely,
Gary & Judy Gentemann
1 935 S. North Dakota St.
Tigard, Or 97223
-7 /97/q
sad