City Council Packet - 03/11/1997■
I;
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON / I
TIGARD CIT COUNCIL
MEETING
MARCH 11, 1997
COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE
TELEVISED
a
a
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
i
t
a
i
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
BUSINESS MEETING
MARCH 11, 1997 6:30 PM
TIGARD CITY HALL
13125 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD,'OREGON 97223
CITY OF TIGARD
i PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the
appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the
Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to
be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by
contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator.
Times noted are estimated: it is recommended that persons interested in testifying
be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business
agenda items can be heard in any order after 7.30 p.m .
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and
should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the
Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD -
Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing
impairments; and
• Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is
important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your
need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone
numbers as listed above: 639-4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD -
Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 1
iU
AGENDA
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
MARCH 11, 1997
3
6:30 p.m.
• STUDY SESSION
> DOWNTOWN MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION
e
> HYDROLOGY STUDY REQUEST
• Director of Public Works
> EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into
Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d),
(e), ex (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions,
current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all
discussions within this session are confidential; therefore nothing
from this meeting may be disclosed by those present.
Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session,
but must not disclose any information
7:30 PM
1. BUSINESS MEETING
1.1 Call to Order - City Council 8L Local Contract Review Board
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
7:'35 Pi 7
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please)
7:45 PM
3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
3.1 Approve City Council Minutes: January 28 ex February 11, 1997
3.2 Receive And File:
a. Council Calendar
b. Tentative Agenda
3.3 Approve Supplemental Budget For Streets Capital Improvement
Program - Resolution No. 97-
COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 2
3.4 Approve Budget Adjustment For Transfer Of Urban Services From
Washington County - Resolution No. 97-
3.5 Approve Amendment To Pay Plan - Resolution No. 97-_
• Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items
requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate
discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted
on those items which do not need discussion.
7:50 PM
4. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING - (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 17
8t 30, 1996) - TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS
a. Open Public Hearing
b. Declarations or Challenges
C. Staff Report: Community Development Department
d. Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents
e. Staff Recommendation
f. Council Deliberation/Discussion
g. Council Consideration
8:50 PM
5. COUNCIL GOAL - PRIORITY LISTING
a. Staff Report: City Manager
b. Council Direction: (Motion)
9:30 PM
6. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
9:40 PM
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), ex (h) to
discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending
litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are
confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those
present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this
session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session.
10:00 PM
8. ADJOURNMENT
1AadmXwthy\co\97031 L.doc
COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 3
Agenda Item No. -L
Meeting of L//Oan
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 11, 1997
STUDY SESSION
> Meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Jim Nicoli
> Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli, Councilors Paul Hunt, Brian Moore, Bob Rohl f, and Ken
Scheckla.
Staff Present: City Manager Bill Monahan; Legal Counsel Pam Beery; Community
Development Director Jim Hendryx; Finance Director Wayne Lowry; Asst. to the City
Manager Liz Newton; Nadine Smith, Senior Planner; Ed Wegner, Public Works Director; and
City Recorder Catherine Wheatley.
> Hydrology Study Request
i
Ed Wegner reported receipt of a letter from the Lake Oswego Corporation in which the
Corporation requested all jurisdictions in the Tualatin River drainage basin to participate in a
hydrology study to determine if the level of the headgate on the Oswego Canal could be raised
to minimize flooding in their area. He said that they requested a $25,000 contribution from
Tigard to fund the study.
Councilor Hunt asked how raising the headgate on the Canal would benefit Tigard. Mr. Wegner
stated that staff did not believe it would benefit the City, as doing so would back up water in the
Tualatin causing more extensive flooding upstream, including in Cook Park. He mentioned that
the City of Tualatin was investigating working with the Army Corps of Engineers through the
Washington County Emergency Management Office to conduct and fund the first phase of a
smaller hydrology study on the Tualatin.
Mr. Wegner commented that staff was not aware of any jurisdictions willing to participate in
this study, including the City of Lake Oswego. He recommended not expending the $25,000 at
this time. The Council accepted staff s recommendation by consensus. In response to Councilor
Hunt's suggestion, Mr. Wegner said that he would inform Tualatin that they supported working
with the Army Corps of Engineers.
> Downtown Merchants Association
Bill Monahan, City Manager, asked for discussion on the direction that the City Council
wanted to set for the downtown, and on issues such as the funds left in the Merchants
Association's account. He noted the presence of Mike Marr and Heather Chrisman of the
Downtown Merchant's Association.
Councilor Hunt asked if the recommendation presented by the Association reflected the entire
membership. Mike Marr, Merchants Association, stated that like most organizations, only
20% or less of the membership was actually involved in the organization. He listed the seven
members who regularly participated in the weekly meetings. He said that they had a mailing list
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 1
of 160, including both property owners and business owners (who were not necessarily the same
person). He advised that he kept the mailing list up to date to the best of his ability.
Councilor Scheckla asked where the boundaries of the Merchants Association membership area
were. Mr. Marr said that the Merchants Association included the Central Business District
(south of Highway 99, west of Hall Blvd to O'Mara, and along Fanno Creek, including the
apartments).
Heather Chrisman, business owner, spoke to creating a sense of place in Tigard in the
downtown with which people could identify. She commented that businesses sometimes
weren't willing to join until they have already seen progress. They needed the vision and
leadership that the Association and the City could provide.
Mr. Marr reviewed his memo summarizing the ideas from the brainstorming session attended by
the regular participants. He noted that the ideas were not in priority order nor did the
Association necessarily unanimously agree on all of them. He spoke for the Council taking the
lead. He commented that after three years, he has learned that the private business or property
owners by themselves could not get the job done; someone needed to take the lead. He
suggested a joint session between the Council and the Association to generate ideas. He
expressed concern that unless the City and the Association became proactive on Main Street,
other elements would take over.
Mayor Nicoli noted Mr. Marr's concern about what might happen on Main Street, citing as an
example the intentions of the owner of the old GTE building on the corner of Main and
Burnham to put in a drinking establishment. He reviewed the two types of liquor licenses
granted by the OLCC, commenting that a OLCC Commissioner told him that the community
could influence which license the OLCC granted, if they spoke in favor of one over the other.
He suggested that the Council inform the OLCC that they preferred the license allowing liquor
to be served as secondary to food rather than the license allowing liquor as the primary product.
is
Councilor Scheckla asked to see the OLCC laws before voting on the Mayor's suggestion. '
Mayor Nicoli reviewed the process by which a community could influence the OLCC. He f
commented that they were not telling the property owner that he could not use his property, they
were telling the OLCC that they did not want a drinking establishment on Main Street. He
mentioned that they might be able to zone outright against a hard-core drinking establishment.
4
Mr. Monahan suggested that staff return with an overview of the options in this situation,
including the OLCC procedures. Councilor Scheckla reiterated his interest in how the liquor
laws read.
Mayor Nicoli noted that the OLCC required full compliance with a community's land use laws.
He commented that Tigard has been fortunate that no adult-only businesses have located along
Main Street but stated that unless they became proactive, it could happen. He recommended
providing incentives to business owners to put in appropriate businesses along Main Street
instead of using the method of area-wide restrictions used by the City in the past. He reviewed
several examples of such incentives used in Portland and Gresham to improve their downtown -
districts. He spoke to incorporating such incentives either in the current Code rewrite or
separately to promote and protect growth in the downtown.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 2
r)
Mr. Monahan commented that for the past three to four years the Citv has been waiting on the
Association to present their ideas for the downtown. Now he heard Mr. Marr asking Council to
take the lead in developing a plan with the Association's input. He recommended putting
together a plan for the direction of the downtown and then rewriting the Code so they would
have a direction within which to rewrite the Code.
Councilor Hunt asked how this tied in with visioning. Mr. Monahan said that staff hoped that
the downtown would emerge as one of the focus areas in the visioning process. Liz Newton,
Assistant to the City Manager, pointed out that while people were more generally concerned
about transportation and roads, staff has received comments about the downtown.
The Council discussed the idea of the Council taking the lead, concurring that the visioning
process was the best method to use at present in developing a direction for the downtown. It
involved other citizens besides the downtown merchants and should be completed prior to the
Code rewrite.
At Councilor Scheckla's request, Mr. Marr reviewed the structure of the Association, pointing
out that the same three people have rotated as the officers for the past several years (Chuck
Woodward, Pam Benson and himself) because they were the most involved. He reported that at
their last meeting he announced his resignation as President, stating his belief that he could be as
effective for the downtown by participating in the visioning process as he could be through the
Association.
Councilor Scheckla commented that the only complaint he heard about the downtown was the
planter box on Tigard Avenue that people kept running in to. Mr. Marr explained that ODOT
put that tear drop shaped curbing in during the improvements to Main Street; the Association
simply requested permission to plant flowers in it to make it look attractive.
Councilor Rohlf commented that the discussion included both short-term and long-term
situations. The reader board, the stop signs, the planter box and taking a position on the OLCC
license were short term items while the rest should be part of the long-term visioning process.
Mayor Nicoli noted that the options were to do something now on developing a direction for the
downtown or wait until the visioning process was nearer completion before setting up a Task
Force to make recommendations on zoning ordinances and other regulations.
Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director, mentioned that his department was
working on several things, including the Code rewrite, the Metro 2040 planning process, and the
visioning process, that would fit together to make a cohesive plan for the downtown and
Washington Square. He asked for more time for staff to look at the comprehensive picture
before reporting back to Council, including a review of previous City planning efforts.
Mayor Nicoli supported working some of the short-tern items listed in the Association memo
into the Council agenda over the next couple of months, commenting that incentives and
encouraging owners to upgrade their buildings was doable in Tigard.
Councilor Hunt pointed out that both Gresham and NW 23`d redeveloped because one member
of the community had the financial resources to take the leadership in investing in
redevelopment. Ms. Chrisman mentioned that since Tigard lacked such an individual, the City
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 3
could step in to put in place the ordinances and code provisions for pedestrian-oriented
development.
Councilor Scheckla expressed concern that the City was telling a property owner what he could
'i or could not do with his property. Ms. Chrisman noted that this wouldn't be any different from
current zoning regulations.
Mayor Nicoli recommended dealing with the short-term items quickly and making a
commitment to putting together a Task Force to work on the long-term items as soon as the
visioning process provided sufficient direction for the downtown.
1 Councilor Scheckla asked why the Association listed no parking between Main and Commercial
streets at certain hours. Mr. Marr reviewed the traffic situation, explaining that the elimination
of a few on-street parking spaces at the north end of Main Street would provide a through curb
lane for traffic turning into the Post Office. He pointed out that the problem was at its worst
i during the Christmas holiday season.
Ms. Newton commented that she heard a comment at the OLCC that cities should probably
i review their own internal review criteria for OLCC permits because there might be more that
cities could be doing than they currently were. At that time she picked up information for staff
review and consideration.
Mr. Monahan recommended putting the stop signs, reader boards, and other small items on next
week's agenda, directing staff to report back on the OLCC situation in May or June, and
keeping the visioning process on track.
> Agenda Review
In response to Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Monahan reported that Interfaith Outreach has not yet
j made application regarding their new site but they were preparing a report to address the City's
concerns.
Mr. Wegner commented that Public Works supported removing the tear-shaped island on Tigard
j Street.
I
Mayor Nicoli recessed the meeting at 7:28 p.m.
1. BUSINESS MEETING
• Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board
Mayor Nicoli called the business meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
• Council Communications/Liaison Reports
j Mayor Nicoli reported that the MSTIP 3 project funding has been frozen due to Measure 47.
1 The current contracts would be met but anything beyond those was on hold.
Mayor Nicoli reported that the Washington County Coordinating Committee was looking at
cities individually to determine how appropriate it was to require cities to spend 50% of its
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 4
s
k
TIF money on major arterials. He said that it was likely Tigard would be
given more leeway
'
I
in spending its TIF money since Tigard
s only major arterials were the State roads (Highway
99 and Hall Blvd).
• Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items: None
a
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilor Hunt pulled Items 3.4 and 3.5.
Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt the Consent
Agenda, Items 3.1 through 3.3.
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors
Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.")
3.1 Approve City Council Minutes: January 28 and February 11, 1997
f
3.2 Receive and File:
a. Council Calendar
b. Tentative Agenda
3.3 Approve Supplemental Budget For Streets Capital Improvement Program - Resolution
No. 97-08
Consent Agenda items Removed for Separate Discussion
j
3.4 Approve Budget Adjustment For Transfer of Urban Services From Washington County
i
Mr. Monahan explained the urban services transfer agreement was currently under negotiation
with Washington County. This included Tigard taking responsibility for planning, building,
engineering, streets, and code enforcement activities in the unincorporated areas of Walnut
Island and Bull Mountain. He said that staff estimated that the cost of providing those services
for the next two months, including the start up capital costs and the hiring of 10 additional staff
I
I
members, could be $150,000. He noted that the City would be reimbursed by the County for
these expenses.
Mr. Monahan said that staff was continuing to pursue the intergovernmental agreement with the
County to implement this transfer, per Council direction last April. They hoped to have a final
draft ready for Council at the March 25"' meeting.
Councilor Moore asked if the budget adjustment could be rescinded if the IGA did not go
through. Mr. Monahan said yes.
Councilor Hunt stated that he had many questions about this arrangement and wanted to see the
f
t
IGA prior to voting on the budget adjustment. He asked how long the agreement would run. He
commented that he initially thought the City would have to hire 3 to 4 new staff people, not 10.
!E
He pointed out the City's space needs and previous attempts to find additional space to house
the staff they already had, including the "temporary" trailer they brought in nine years ago to
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 5
l~
~J
s>i
h
y p
C
t
t
} t0
1
re
C
1 b
pr
H
i
ior to offering the position to anyone because it would enhance their ability to find someone.
al
ouse engineering staff. He asked how they could bring in more staff when they stopped the
olice expansion due to Measure 47.
ouncilor Hunt expressed concern at the public perception of the City hiring additional staff at
he same time they were trying to deal with the revenue cutbacks of Measure 47. He reiterated
hat he wanted to see the contract prior to moving ahead on any aspect of it because there were
o many unanswered questions.
M
r. Monahan suggested postponing this item for two weeks until the Council saw the IGA. He
commended discussing the City space needs in frill once the entire package was before the
ouncil, though he requested some discussion on the issue during the study session tonight
ecause staff needed to make some decisions fairly quickly.
M
r. Monahan explained that staff wanted to have the legal authority in place to hire new staff
e explained that Item 3.5 had two separate items in it, and that they could wait two weeks on it
so.
> 3.5 Approve Amendment to Pay Plan
Councilor Hunt stated his objections to hiring a Technical Services Specialist in the library,
asking how they could increase staffing in one department while at the same time telling other
departments they couldn't hire replacement staff. Mr. Monahan explained that the Inspector
Supervisor position related to the urban services transfer agreement and could be considered on
' March 25`h at the same time as the IGA. He reviewed the process by which staff dealt with
requests for new positions, and recommended postponing the Technical Service Specialist
request until they went through the budget process.
I
J 4. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING - (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 17 & 30,
1996) - TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS
a. Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the public hearing.
b. Declarations or Challenges
Councilor Rohlf stated that he talked to staff about this item to get more information on it.
Councilors Scheckla and Hunt each stated that he has driven by the area. Mayor Nicoli said
that he also has had discussions with staff on the issue. There were no challenges.
c. Staff Report
Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director, reviewed the process used to develop these
standards, including five Task Force meetings since January to reach consensus on the
recommendation. He expressed his appreciation for the citizens' and consultants' commitment
to the process. He introduced the consultants, Lloyd Lindley, John Spencer, and Elaine Cogan.
Nadine Smith, Senior Planner, listed the citizen members of the Task Force.
Lloyd Lindley, urban designer, concurred with Mr. Hendryx on the excellent work of the
citizen Task Force in developing these standards. He expressed appreciation on behalf of the
consultant team.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 6
Mr. Lindley reviewed the primary goal and five principles used for the design standards. The
goal was to create a mixed-use employment district that was complimentary to the rest of the
community and region. The five principles included a safe, secure, and convenient pedestrian
environment within the Tigard Triangle that linked internal uses and connected to the city-wide
system, integration of the development with the significant natural features found within the
Triangle, the use of streetscape as a key element in creating a high-quality image and
establishing people-friendly spaces, a transition from low-density residential to mixed-use
employment that respected the livability of the residential areas, and the allowance for the
opportunity of residential uses within compatible employment areas.
Mr. Lindley reviewed the standards. He said that the two options in the street-connectivity
standard were compatible with the Metro guidelines with Option B intended to provide
flexibility on difficult sites. He noted the two new landscape standards. He commented that the
Task Force felt it important to include a standard on roof mounted equipment. He mentioned
the portal standards, commenting that they identified both primary and secondary portal
locations as well as a fundamental design that needed refining. He pointed out the street and
access way standard table developed as a tool for staff to use in determining the character,
quality, and type of streets placed in the new developments. He commented that the access-way
standards were intended to provide connectivity through the site.
Councilor Scheckla asked about the Class 2 access standard which included a reduction of the
40-foot right of way for emergency vehicle access to 30 feet (page 12). Mr. Lindley explained
that the reduction was included to provide more flexibility for developers but noted that the fire
marshal had the final say on fire equipment access to buildings; the minimum standard was 20
feet.
Ms. Smith distributed a fax memo from Mike Burton at Metro received today that supported the
standards as proposed.
d. Public Testimony
Mayor Nicoli reviewed the hearing procedures and criteria.
PROPONENTS
> Jerry Cach, Cash Realty, 15170 SW Sunrise Lane, spoke for putting in as many streets as
necessary. He cited the Sunnyside Shopping Center, east of I-205, as an example of a successful
shopping center that provided parking without eliminating streets.
> Gordon Martin, Jr., 12265 SW 72°a Avenue, asked to speak after Mr. Whitlow because of
new information he had just received.
> Kathy Godfrey, 7435 SW Hermosa Way, Task Force member, reviewed the work of the Task
Force, stating that while the document was not perfect, the basic concept was great and
represented the best compromise they could reach.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 7
r)
j
i
i
f
i
OPPONENTS
> Mark Whitlow, representing Gordon Martin, Sr., reviewed his experience in land use
planning through his work with the Transportation Planning Rule and the Metro process. He
pointed out that Tigard had approximately half of the land identified in the Metro Functional
Plan as appropriate for large scale development (in excess of 60,000 square feet).
Mr. Whitlow commented that the one area of agreement in the regional land-use planning
discussion was that they should not try to make everything look the same. He pointed out the
two types of development as auto oriented and pedestrian oriented, either of which worked in
their appropriate places. He noted that the state and Metro planning concepts centered around
transit and pedestrians while allowing large scale auto oriented development to continue but
making them more pedestrian friendly. He said that they saw a difference in the application of
building placement and parking lot placement in the C-G area and the mixed use employment
areas. He asked that those standards not be applied to the C-G area.
Mr. Whitlow stated that a pedestrian-scale development worked only if pedestrians were there.
The only way to get pedestrians there was if they lived there or came there via a transit system.
He said that building and parking lot placements did not bring pedestrians to a development. He
asked to check the premise of what the City was really trying to accomplish and whether or not
the City was trying to do the same thing throughout the whole Triangle.
Mr. Whitlow reviewed the requirements for street connections for vehicles and pedestrians,
noting that they came out of the Metro Functional Plan. He contended that those standards
clearly applied to residential and mixed-use developments, not to commercial developments.
He spoke against breaking the large commercial areas into blocks too small to use for
commercial, and requested reconsideration of that standard as it applied to the General
Commercial zone.
Mr. Whitlow objected to the requirement in the site design standards for the larger developments
to have 50% of their perimeter in pads. He said that other jurisdictions have settled on requiring
half that amount. While lie agreed with the recommendation that the pads did not have to be
built in advance of the larger building, he contended that 50% of the perimeter was not an
attainable figure.
Mr. Whitlow pointed out that the maximum setback requirement of 10 feet presented a problem
for drive-through establishments which needed, at a minimum, the state standard of a 20-foot
setback to achieve a drive-through lane that looked good with proper landscaping. He noted that
the front yard setbacks did not appear to contemplate drive-through lanes either. He asked that
staff "tweak" the language to address this concern.
Mr. Whitlow spoke to the issue of parking location and landscape designs, arguing that parking
placed behind a building presented a safety problem because it was not visible from the
storefront. He contended that parking behind the building and pushing the building up against
the street also presented a logistical problem for retailers: they needed an entrance convenient
for their customers. He agreed with trying to make the "big seas of parking" look and operate
better but spoke against making the large-scale developments try to be pedestrian developments
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 8
i
I~
I
q because that would drive away the discount stores and increase the cost of goods and services.
t 7 He noted a need for "affordable goods and services" in addition to affordable housing.
Mr. Whitlow asked if it was necessary to require pedestrian connections through a building
every 300 feet (page 3), contending that that meant they could not have a big building. He noted
that Hillsboro took a similar requirement out of their ordinance.
Mr. Whitlow asked that a provision be included to allow a non-conforming building lost to fire
or flood to be rebuilt in the same building envelope rather than under the new regulations. He
requested more time to work with staff and leaving the record open so he could submit written
testimony.
> Gordon Martin, Jr., SW 72"d Avenue, noted that the sketchbook showed Dartmouth with a
70-foot right of way when the Task Force had revised it to a 92-foot right of way to build a five-
lane facility with a median, a bike path, and a pedestrian path. Staff said that they would double
check this standard.
Mr. Martin noted a concern of several people that irregular site sizes not be required to go
through the variance process. He concurred that it was essential to be able to put parking in
front of buildings. He spoke for interpreting the phrase "local origin" as beginning street
improvement from the property line or curb cut as opposed to beginning street improvements
from the building. He said that the second definition meant that he would have to dedicate roads
from a building through a parking lot which was unacceptable for reasons of maintenance,
security, planning, remodeling, and future financial hardship. Under the first definition he
could have driveways that were not publicly dedicated but would have 24-hour access
easements for maintenance.
Mr. Martin noted the items mentioned by Mr. Whitlaw, commenting that the 350-foot
requirement for pedestrian connections and the setbacks could be changed. He said that he had
agreed to the 50% frontage on a major arterial as a compromise.
Mr. Martin also noted the amount of work that went into developing these standards and what a
requirement could mean in terms of dollars to a developer.
> Ed Christensen, Christensen Engineering, 7150 SW Hampton Street, #226, representing the
Martin and Cub Food properties, stated that he was a civil engineer who attended the Task Force
design standard meetings. He expressed concern about the right-of-way sections, asking who
made the decisions on how the standards were applied. Fie held that the commercial sites in
Tigard were among those excepted out of the street spacing in the Metro standards (Goal 4). He
contended that the proportional benefit to the citizens of attempting to implement a grid system
throughout the Triangle was questionable. He cited the Kittleson and Associates traffic
generation model that determined that the existing road system could handle development at
buildout without modifications (other than those already slated).
Mr. Christensen argued that developers could not use these standards without knowing how they
would be implemented or who would implement them. He cited the calculations he did for a
site between 72nd and 68`h Avenues, concluding that almost 50% of the site would be taken up
with right of way improvements under these standards. He argued against placing those kind of
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 9
requirements on developers who could find other ways to deal with access problems (which they
did not want to see either).
Mr. Christensen reiterated that he did not think there was a proportional benefit to society in the
rights-of-way requirements. He said that developers needed more information regarding
implementation of these standards in order to design a site. He mentioned the lack of reciprocal
easement agreements, and the need for separate fire vault and driveway systems, even if several
parcels were under one ownership.
Mr. Christensen noted that sometimes these issues could be worked out on planning projects and
sometimes not. Fie cited examples of projects which developers could not lease (Washington
County and Eastport Plaza). He pointed out that commercial lessees had agreements requiring
the development company to maintain facilities and access but the cities already couldn't
maintain their part because of Measure 47.
Mr. Christensen said that the right of way for Dartmouth was 92 feet with 102 feet at some
points for turning movements. He said that the developers wanted a good physical environment
for Tigard, an economically viable project, and the opportunity to work with staff and the public
to develop the goals contained in the design standards. Fie contended that they could not accept
many of the elements in the document because they wouldn't be able to lease their sites and get
the kind of tenants necessary for a fiscally responsible project. He asked for more time to work
with staff.
Councilor Hunt asked if the Cub Foods representative on the Task Force expressed these same
concerns during the meetings. Kathy Godfrey stated that Paul Simmons, the Cub Food
representative, did state that he was categorically opposed to the dividing up of the tract and to
the road access.
> Elaine Cogan, Cogan Owens Cogan, 10 NW 10th Avenue
Portland, OR 97209-3120, stated that her job had been to help facilitate the process and keep it
moving. She pointed out that this was the third attempt to deal with the Tigard Triangle and to I-
address the community's needs and concerns with this special place in Tigard. She said that the
Task Force discussed extensively the issues and arrived at a document that gave the City the
tools to start developing the Triangle as the special place it was . She emphasized that the
document was not perfect and mentioned the amendment process. She said that this document
included the public comments and concerns heard at the two public meetings. She asked the
Council to keep faith with those who worked so hard on this document, and to adopt it tonight.
Mayor Nicoli recessed the meeting for a break at 9:11 p.m.
Mayor Nicoli reconvened the meeting at 9:25 p.m.
Mayor Nicoli entered into the record a March 11, 1997 memo received from Tigard Triangle
Task Force members and property owners. Mr. Martin clarified that it was only from those
members who signed the memo.
Mayor Nicoli suggested that the Council agree on what issues still needed refinement and
request staff and citizens to resolve those issues, if possible, and return in two weeks with
recommendations. Even if they could not reach agreement, Council would make the decision at
that time.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 10
i
Councilor Hunt suggested adopting the design standards tonight, and directing staff to return
with possible amendments on the items in question.
Councilor Rohif spoke for adopting the document tonight without a major rewrite, commenting
they could tweak a couple of things to make the document more acceptable to Mr. Martin and
Mr. Christensen. Councilors Moore and Scheckla concurred.
Councilor Rohif asked if Street Options 2 needed adjustment to define "local origin" as
beginning from the property line as opposed to the building. Mr. Hendryx stated that he thought
the standards were clear as written, and that further tweaking was not necessary. He noted the
built in variance procedure. He said that staff needed to see a plan before they could respond to
the developers' concerns about rights of way.
Ms. Smith commented that the street standards were intended to be tools to use in coming up
with the specifics of how a property would develop. The standards included a range from 10
feet to 40 feet depending on the purpose of the access, which was why staff needed an actual
plan to look at before they could know how the standards would apply.
Mayor Nicoli asked why access ways could not be required as part of the development but left
under the ownership of the property owner who would then be responsible for maintenance.
Ms. Smith said that a 24-our continuous public easement over private land was an option
available, as long as the access way was constructed to City standards. Pam Beery, Legal
Counsel, confirmed to Councilor Scheckla that while the City could assure the provision of
access with respect to private driveways, they could not dictate the level of maintenance short of
code violations.
Councilor Rohif asked if the variance procedure was onerous. Mr. Hendryx reviewed the
variance procedure, commenting that it was intended to provide flexibility in a hardship
situation. Within the standards, the definition of "hardship" was broadened to include other
considerations not currently in the Code.
Councilor Rohlf raised the "local origin" issue. Mr. Hendryx said that he did not understand
Mr. Martin's question. He said that the intent was to provide for right of way through the
property, not to retroactively acquire a street leading up to the building. Ms. Smith concurred
with Mr. Hendryx. Mr. Hendryx pointed out that they were creating legislative history tonight
on staffs interpretation of this section.
Councilor Rohlf noted that Mr. Martin had commented that he had other issues which staff had
told him he needed to bring to Council. He asked Mr. Hendryx if he knew of any other issues
that still needed discussion. Mr. I-lendryx said that he was not aware of any.
Councilor Rohlf asked if the large numbers of trees in the Tigard Triangle would be preserved.
Mr. Hendryx reviewed the tree ordinance and other tools in place to preserve trees. He noted the
replacement fund for replanting trees in the community, stating that he intended to propose an
implementation program for that fund. He stated that the Task Force spent considerable time on
developing standards to insure a high-quality development in the Triangle. Councilor Rohif
requested that the money paid into the tree replacement fund by Triangle developers be
dedicated to replacing trees in the Triangle.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 1 1
or
Ms. Smith confirmed to Mayor Nicoli that the requirement to pull the building to the front of the
lot applied to all lots, not simply corner lots. She noted that development on parcels of a certain
Id b 1 sed in be innin at the rear of the property but including future development
size cou e p ,a g b
along the right of way.
Councilor Rohlf asked how the portals would be handled. Mr. Hendryx said that the Task Force
thought that the property owners should take leadership in providing landscaping improvements
for the portal areas. He noted other options such as Council directing staff to work with a
consultant to design the portals or forming an association to fund and facilitate improvements.
He said that staff would return to Council with a recommendation on an implementation plan; it
might utilize a different Task Force.
Councilor Rohlf asked about long term enforcement of the standards. Mr. Hendryx said that
enforcement would come partly through development standards and partly through a property
owner association.
Mayor Nicoli asked if there was still the ability for a planned unit development to "throw out the
rules" and come back with something better for Council consideration. Mr. Hendryx said
planned development overlay was still allowed in the Triangle commercial zones. He
expressed concern at extending that to the entire Triangle because of discussion on the Task
Force concerning the issue.
Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing.
e. Staff Recommendation: Mr. Hendryx recommended adoption of the proposed amendments
f. Council Consideration
Councilor Rohlf spoke to adopting the standards tonight. He said that he thought the concerns
regarding uncertainty in language have been addressed through the legislative record made
tonight. He said that he was hesitant to tamper with the standards and breaking faith with those
who came to a consensus on them through the open public process.
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to adopt the Tigard Triangle
Design Standards.
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors
Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.")
Councilor Hunt expressed his appreciation for the successful work by staff and citizens
Councilor Rohlf asked for consensus to direct staff to come back with an implementation plan
for the standards, including dedication of tree replacement funds to purchase trees for the
specific area, design and implementation of the portals, and discussion on the formation of an
association. Councilor Hunt concurred with Councilor Rohlf, except he spoke to allowing staff
to develop its own plan on the replacement fund.
The Council agreed by consensus to so direct staff.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 12
r) 5. COUNCIL GOAL - PRIORITY LISTING
Mr. Monahan reviewed the staff work done on the 1997 Council goals, including issue
definition, elements needed to achieve the goal, and departments assigned to each goal (in
priority order). He said that, after receiving Council input this evening, staff would discuss these
goals in light of existing budgets and work programs. He asked for general direction from
Council on how to proceed.
Councilor Hunt said that he would hold his comments on the space needs until the study session.
He suggested that the City Council and the Planning Commission have input on the
comprehensive public facility plan prior to the staff recommendation (page 4). Mr. Monahan
said that staff could assemble what information the City already had, and then work with a
review committee of the Planning Commission and the Council to get direction. From there, the
engineer would work on the plan with regular checkpoints with the Planning Commission and
Council.
Councilor Hunt asked that USA be involved in the study of the trunk and sewer line (page 5).
He noted the library bond goal, contending that putting out a finance package for the library
separate from police and other city needs would not work. He spoke for combining police and
library in a bond request to the voters. He asked for more Council discussion on the issue. Mr.
Monahan said that staff would leave it as written with the understanding that it was not yet a
goal.
j Councilor Rohlf suggested combining the planning studies to include Washington Square,
Walnut Island, Scholls Ferry, and the downtown. He complimented the City Manager on the
layout of the Council goal report.
Mr. Monahan noted the discussion on bringing the goal process into a November cycle to work
1 with the budget process. He commented that it would also let them work with the goals coming
out of the visioning process. He said that staff would prioritize these goals after discussion, and
submit the list to Council for adoption.
i
Mayor Nicoii recessed the meeting to study session at 10:15 p.m.
6. NON AGENDA ITEMS: None.
7. STUDY SESSION
Mr. Monahan reviewed the staff proposal to move the four long-range planners to the Water
Building, pending IWB approval, and to rearrange staff placement within City Hall. He noted
the consideration of moving staff so that customer service and the cohesiveness of the
department unit was not affected. He reviewed the plans for providing space for the five new
staff members needed for the urban services transfer. He noted the problems of work disruption,
rearranging on a temporary basis, and environmental considerations.
Mr. Monahan reviewed the need to reexamine how City Hall was used to house staff. He
mentioned the environmental analysis report on molds and mildews. There are more employees
housed in City Hall than was the original plan. In addition, there is a need to clean up the
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 13
,,~~p~q, HVAC system. He said that he turned down the engineers' request for another trailer because
F' ) they had been trying to develop long-term space solutions.
Mr. Monahan said that the only available space was in the Water Building, the Interfaith
Outreach building, and the Canterbury building, He said that the Canterbury building was best
for Public Works, not City Hall personnel (whose work would be affected at a satellite location).
He presented the staff proposal to purchase and install a triple wide trailer unit for between
$75,000 to $90,000.
Councilor Hunt asked why not spend that money remodeling the building where Interfaith
Outreach was currently located. Mr. Monahan said that Interfaith wouldn't be out until the
spring. He said that he was not opposed to moving Interfaith Outreach out of the building and
having Public Works evaluate what was needed to upgrade it. He mentioned that Sandy Zodrow
has volunteered to move the Human Resources department to that building (six people).
The Council discussed asking Interfaith to move out of the building in September per
Interfaith's original estimate for their move-out. They noted the issues involved with
Interfaith's land use application for the Rite Center property. They considered renting interim
office space for Interfaith if necessary.
The Council discussed other options to meet the space needs. Mayor Nicoli pointed out that the
trailer proposed by staff had a good resale value; the City would recoup much of the $75,000 to
$90,000 cost of purchase and installation. Mr. Monahan said that staff would continue to look
at exactly what they needed in order to work the transfer of urban services. He said that all of
Engineering could move into the new trailer, thus freeing up the old trailer for Mr. Hendryx's
inspectors. He noted Chief Goodpaster's plan to move his Community Service Officers from
City Hall to the police section on a short-term basis. He said that another option was moving
Interfaith into the Niche.
Councilor Hunt expressed concern at discussing the purchase of the trailer during this study
session when they said during the business meeting that they would wait two weeks to move on
it. Mr. Monahan said that he did intend to wait two weeks on this because the time frame has
changed. However he needed to discuss this issue with the Council. He commented that staff
had also been surprised by the number of people needed for the transfer of urban services. They
had thought that they would need only four to five people, and now were pursuing any available
options.
Mr. Monahan said that he also needed to know what to request of the I WB regarding the Water
Building. He mentioned that Mr. Lowry, Finance Director, has said that the City did not need to
buy the Water Building. However if the City made any major renovations to that building, Mr.
Monahan thought that the City should own it.
Councilor Hunt asked how the additional staff would be financed. Mr. Hendryx said that they
would be paid for by the County and supported either by fees, direct revenue to the County, and
transfers from the County's general fund. Councilor Hunt commented on the difficulty of
tracking who spent how much time on County versus City work. Ms. Newton pointed out that
engineers already tracked their time for chargeback to CIP projects.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCII 11, 1997 - PAGE 14
l
Mr. Monahan concurred that the City would have to work out a program for those working on
County projects. He said that they were proposing a five-year term for the IGA. Mr. Hendryx
noted that either side could step out of the agreement, with proper notification. He pointed out
that the space proposal presented by Mr. Monahan accommodated only the staff added as of
May 1. Any staff added in July or September would require additional space.
a
7 The Council continued to discuss the space needs. Suggestions included using offices at
~ construction sites, using the auditorium in the Water building, asking Interfaith to consolidate its
y use into one area and letting the City use the rest, moving Interfaith into temporary trailers,
leasing the Precision Graphics building, moving the court to the Water Building, and utilizing
the USA building in Durham.
In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Monahan said that he could not estimate
how many people they would need for the road services because they only received sufficient
information from the County this week.
Mr. Monahan said that he would ask the IWB for authorization to move four to six employees to
the Water Building, and consideration of using the auditorium for a short time.
Councilor Hunt asked if they had an obligation to keep the water people in the Water Building.
He asked for discussion on whether or not it was to the City's advantage to move the water
people out and use the building for other uses. Mayor Nicoli spoke for talking with Durham and
King City before taking that position. Mr. Monahan said that they intended to leave the finance
and water billing people in the Water Building. He reported that Mr. Wegner intended to move
the SCATA monitoring system over to Public Works. He commented that unless they
eliminated the town hall, they would not have sufficient room in that building to fit planning,
building, and engineering.
Mr. Monahan said that he would contact Kim Brown of Interfaith Outreach to discuss the
situation.
8. ADJOURNMENT: 10:51 p.m.
I
w
Attest: Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder
r, City of Ti and `
ate:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 11, 1997 - PAGE 15
® COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS INC.
s Legal
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice TT 8752
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 i
K E ?J V? opce Advertising
•City of Tigard MAR 11 • O Tearsheet Notice
13125 SW Hall Blvd. 1997
• Tigard,Oregon 97223 CITY OF .71GARD • D Duplicate Affidavit
•Accounts Payable •
t
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON )
COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS, )as'
1, Kathy Snyder
_
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of the'-AFZr -Tualatin Times
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at Ti garcL_ in the
aforesaid county and state; that the
_Cit-y-Sn un _i 1 B lainesaP'ieeti ng
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for QNF successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
March 6,1997
ti
Subscribed and sworn to e~ore me this 6th
Notar
day__Q_f March, 1
OFr;CIAI SEAL
r ROC ai A. EURGESS
blic for Oregon NO7AR °LIC-OREGON
My Commission Expires:
COMM
M CO: ! NO. 024552
, 01011 i!IES MAY16,199"
AFFIDAVIT
The following meeting highlights are published for your information. Full
agendas may be obtained from the City Recorder, 13125 S.W. Hall
Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639-4171.
I..
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
TIGARD CITY HALL-TOWN HALL
13125 S.W. HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON
March 11, 1997
Study Meeting (Red Rock Creek Room) (6:30 P.M.) _
• Discussion-Downtown Merchants Association
Hydrology Study Request
• Executive Session
Business Meeting (Town Hall) (7:30 P.M.)
• Legislative Public Hearing - Tigard Triangle Design Standards
(continued from December 17 and 30, 1996.)
• Prioritize Council Goals
TT8752 - Publish March 6, 1997.
I AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 -VISITOR'S AGENDA -PAGE 2 DATE: March 11, 1997 I
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
lease sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from
you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns
through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
{
i
1
,depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of
A ending
each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may
further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement
oral testimony.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 DATE: March 11, 1997
4. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) - TIGARD TRIANGLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-0008/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 96-0008/ZONE ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT (ZOA) 96-0005
PROPOSAL: A request for approval of legislative Comprehensive Plan Map, Rezone and Text
Amendments within the area known as the Tigard Triangle. Specifically, the request includes
redesignation from Low Density Residential, High Density Residential, and Commercial Professional
to a new designation of Mixed Use Employment. Additionally, specific implementing amendments to
the Comprehensive Plan and amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map (Ordinance
No. 91-13) are proposed.
A request further includes a request for approval of a zone change from C-P (Commercial -
Professional), R-25 (Residential, 25 units per acre), and R3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units per acre) to new
zoning designation of MUE (Mixed Use Employment). The request also includes amendments to the
Community Development Code to add a new section entitled "Mixed Use Employment" to provide a
new zoning district.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential, High Density Residential, '
and Commercial Professional ZONING DESIGNATION: R3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units per acre),
R-25 (Residential, 25 units per acre), and CP (Commercial Professional) LOCATION: Generally,
east of Highway 217, west of Interstate 5, and south of State Highway 99 West APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 12 and 13; Oregon Administrative Rule
Continued on Page 4
660-12; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 6.6.6, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, 9.1.1, 9.1.3, 12. 1.1
and 12.2.1, and Community Development Code Chapter 18.22 and 18.32.
PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS
GENDA ITEM NO. 4_
Proponent - (Speaking In Favor)
a
i
i
i
i
1
PLEASE P INT
Onnonent - (SDeakine Aminst)
Nam , ress a d Ph
.
Name, Address and Phone No.~
/
LO
'
GG
/f~If
CZG
~
CO
,
LIIi~G
21 2 Sti,% CD
PiA
71
2
.
Na"e, ress and Ph ne N9.
&a„-6'~ S, /uY~ ~ ALi .
Name, Address and Phone No.
1 2.2 4 S ,5 W 73"--
C, 0P, a~aa3
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
6
4
9A
.P.t/
-
Z
Name, Address and Pho No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
Name, Address and Phone No.
7 02/19/1997 13:55 5036363226 LAKE OSWEGO CORP PAGE 01
!
3
~
~SSII~_
3//l14~
/ r o. 9oxY Ava %m
203
+va l I ! 1( 1 if
t
i
e
a C*-
%P. aoya1970U
CORPORATION (OW)636-)422
y
f
(6W) 636.=6 F~
I
k
I.
~i
-
FAX NO:
e
el, -71
f
COMPANY
FROM:
COMPANY: LAKE OSWEGO CORPORATION
FAX NO: (503) 636-3226
K
SUBJECT: e;
p Q~Gt e
NOTES:
~i
f
j
i
02/19,/1997 13:55 5036363226
LAKE OSWEGO CORP PAGE 02
700 McVey Avenue
P.O. Box 203
Lake Oswego, Oregon 970-14
(503) 636-1422
(503) 6363226 Fox
February 3, 1997
To: Prospective participant addressed:
The Flood of 1998 occurred just one year ago. Last month we again collectively
suffered with the New Year's Day Flood of 1997. We are all vulnerable when
mother nature delivers high precipltation to the Tualatin River basin.
As most of you know, losses in the Lake Oswego basin from the Flood of 1998
exceeded 520,000,000. Our basin was lucky the second time, but our losses
still exceeded $500,000. A rebuilding continues. For us, the floods are not over.
While we all face the same continuing threat of future Tualatin River flooding,
we each acted alone when the floods arrived. During these disasters, each of
us responded individually, fighting primarily the piece of water that threatened
our own interests.
It is time for us to depart from this history of individual flood fight responses. All
! of us would benefit from a collective understanding of Tualatin River hydrology.
With good information available, we should then join to develop basin policies
( which reduce flooding risks, better control flood events, and decrease damages.
We are told the Corps of Engineers, perhaps the most capable entity to
i undertake such a hydrology study, will not receive funding in the near future to
perform this work. A preliminary estimate of the costs of conducting an
independent hydrology study of the Tualatin River basin, one focused upon
flood causes and the reduction of flood risks, is about $250,000. This amount is
more than any of us can sponsor individually. But acting collectively, and also
i volunteering our individual data bases, the cost becomes feasible and the
I benefit/cost ratio becomes remarkably high.
j We are requesting each of you to consider, at the most senior policy levels of
your organizations, participation in this proposed study.
You and we cannot successfully defend against flooding as Individual entities.
We must unite to develop a better understanding of flood causes and then
adopt well supported risk reduction policies.
We will visit with each or you in the next two weeks to determine your level of
interest and to solicit your funding commitments in the $25,000 range for this
cooperative endeavor.
Thank you for your attention to this pressing need.
Sincerely,
Charles Schaefer, Lake Warden Donald C. Bu ck Ice Presi ant
i
I
L1iEMORAND
a
a CITY OF TIGi
y TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: William A. Monahan, City Manager
DATE: March 4, 1947
SUBJECT: Study Session Discussion with Downto
d
3
Council last met with the Tigard Downtown Merchan
a tour of several downtown centers in the Metropolita
Association, City Council, and staff viewed successf
✓ for application in Tigard.
i
The Association will meet with Council in a study se
our joint efforts to address the needs of the downtown
3 focal point of the City, although no definitive plans or
j Duriner the study session, I propose that the fa
Association:
i
j 1. Council's goal to determine a directior
the Association play?
2. Whether the reader board proposed by
funded by the City. The Association c
be located on City property, paid for b}
downtown businesses but any busine:
events. The proposal has been disci
I occasion. The latest proposal calls for
expenditure of City funds, with the C
board after it has proven to be useful.
i
j
i
~i ~
Agenda Item No ===L
Meeting of
~I
;D
a i
t Merchant's Association
Association in the Fall. In November
urea was held. Several members of the
revitalization efforts and gained ideas
1~.
ion format to discuss the next steps in
The downtown area continues to be a
irections have been established.
swing topics be discussed with the
or the downtown. What role should
e Association should be permitted and
grinally proposed that the reader board
ie City, and used to advertise not only l
in the City, as well as community
>ed with Council on more than one i
e reader board to be installed without
y having the option of acquiring the
I
f
- f .
l
i Memo to Council
btch 4 1997
ar
Page Two
City departments (Police, Risk Management, Finance, Public Works), as well
as ODOT have expressed concern about the use of a reader board facing Pacific
Highway, in the vicinity of Main Street Park. Harold Lasley, Manager of
ODOT's Sylvan office, has advised our staff that an electronic reader board
would not be allowed at any location along Pacific Highway.
A decision on whether to continue to pursue the reader board is needed.
3. Street improvements in the downtown. Improvements have been made over the
past few years on Main Street and Council. - The merchants propose that
Scoffins and Burnham be considered for improvements in future CIPs.
4. Approximately $31,281 remains of the original $50,000 allocated by Council
for Association projects. The Association and Council should discuss what
expenditures are expected in the coming year.
5. The center island on Main Street by Tigard Street has received mixed reviews
from motorists and City departments. The Association has proposed that a
water line be run below the street to the island to allow for easier watering of
plants in the island. A preliminary discussion point is whether the island should
remain or be removed.
6. During construction activity related to the Main Street resurfacing, a temporary
three-way stop was created at Burnham and Main. Over the past few years the
Association recommended installation of a three-way flashing light at this
intersection. The recent use of stop signs has shown that signs may be a
cheaper alternative to the flashing light and result in improved traffic flow.
Should stop signs be pursued as the solution to this problem until a traffic signal
is warranted at this location?
7. Once the Tigard Feed and Seed Store is removed by the Chamber of
Commerce, the City will be able to construct a municipal parking lot on the
City portion of the land purchased from the railroad. Limitations on City
revenues have reduced the priority for this project. Is there reason to move this
project ahead on the City prioritization list of projects?
Memo to Council
March 4, 1997
Page Three
i
:
Attached are the following:
t
`
• October 30, 1996 letter from dike Harr, explaining the laLCSt board proposal.
Staff concerns about the initial reader board proposal:
I
(a) Ron Goodpaster's memo - November 22, 1996.
(b) Wayne Lowry's memo - November 4, 1996
I
'
• Letter dated -ptember 26, 19^,6 from our insurance agent of record, David
Scherman of J. G. Newman Co. addressing issues of potential claims that could
arise if the City owned the sign located on City property.
WA2Mjh
attachments
-
i
0jdm\biLA0i0497-2. doc
I
3
I
M
Tigard Downtown Merchants Association
A Non-profit Corporation
October 30, 1996
Mr. William Monahan
City Administrator
City of Tigard
(3125 S.W. Hall Blvd
Tigard, Oregon 9722.;
Subject: Reader Board
(503) 624-2975
12420 S. W. Main Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Bill,
Following the last meeting with City Council wherein the Reader Board was discussed,
consideration was given to the amount of information Council felt they needed in order to
further review the idea. It was determined that the time required to gather that data, along
with some other considerations, was significant. The conclusion we came to was that it
might be better to show Council how it has worked, not how it will work.
Here is anew proposal The Merchants Association has received a preliminary offer by
which the Reader Board will be financed with private funds. All that the City would be
asked for at this time is a long term lease of property (less than 100 square feet on the
I park site at the south end of Main Street) for S 1.00 per year. It also would be requested
1 that permit and licen.ing fees be waived. naturally all code requirements will be adhered
to. The Tigard Downtown Merchants Association would take responsibility for the
operation of the Reader Board, probably in cooperation with the Tigard Chamber of
Commerce.
i
Use of the Reader Board would be for any and all, with certain limitations applied. All
users must provide proofof proper registration (Federal Identification, City License where
appropriate. etc ) Commercial use of the Reader Board will be limited to 35% of
operational time. :hvbalance 6>°.1u beine devoted to non-commercial use, i.e. City,
schools, and nun-piotits such as the Cancer Society, etc.
At a later date, tollrn%in a period of time for the operational financial data to be
accumulated, the C:~ could be offered the opportunity to purchase the Reader Board at
cost plus reasonable ::serest It is still the intent that net proceeds from the operation of
the Reader Bowd %ill he distributed amongst the Tigard Downtown Merchants
association, the ft_ar,i Chamber of Commerce (assuming their involvement
` ` operationally), and the City of Tigard.
i
William A. Monahan
i
October S.
Page 2
1
If you determine that Council is willing to consider this proposal, we will be happy to
j
work out the required details with you. Please let us know if you have further questions.
i
Thank you for your cooperation.
j
f
R Michael Marr
Board of Directors
f
®
Tigard Downto%%n Xlet-chants Association
f
i
<a
J
J
MEMORANDUM
+
TO: Bill Monahan
City Administrator
FROM: Ronald D. Goodpaster
Chief of Police
DATE: November 22, 1996
SUBJECT: Downtown Merchants Reader Board
~
l
I would like to advise you of the concerns I have regarding the plan the
Downtown Merchants Association has to establish a reader board in the area of
Main and Highway 99 at the south end. 1 have expressed my concerns to the
president of the Downtown Merchants Association and am concerned about the
effect it will have on traffic
The location proposed for the reader board is a heavity traveled intersection, and
I am concem?d about it causing a visibility concern and a distraction to motorists
as they approach an extremel
bus
inters
cti
ith
l
i
-
y
y
e
on w
severa
turn
ng lanes and
signal options.
1
r
I
I also have some general concern about how the reader board would work, the
i
type of message, the length and size of the letters, and the time needed to read
the message. Again, that would specifically address the distraction issue for
i
motorists as they enter the intersection and have to make a variety of decisions
about the traffic flow.
'i
,
~
I
,
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD
0
TO: Bill Monahan, City Administrator
FROM: Wayne Lowry, Director of Finance
DATE: November 4, 1996
SUBJECT: Merchants Reader Board
have reviewed the latest memo dated October 36, 1996 regarding the Downtown
Merchants Reader Board proposal. I believe there are many reasons why the City
would not want to encourage a reader board but I will Omit my comments to the
proposal by the Merchants.
• The proposal requires a long tens lease of space on public property in the Park at
the end of Main Street. Would this type of arrangement encourage other
commercial enterprises to expect to use other City properties for commercial
advertisement purposes and would we be forced to allow them?
• It appears that the Merchants still aren't sure who will be responsible for the
operation of the Reader Board. Mike uses the word, 'probably' in suggesting the
Merchants and the Chamber will be working together.
• The new proposal does not provide any financial information on projected revenues
or costs. It does not address any of the concerns raised at the last Council meeting.
• The proposal indicates that 35% of the use will be Commercial and 65% non
commercial. There is still no indication how the content of the advertisements will
be managed. Are there possible items that could get on the Board that the City
would find objectionable or unacceptable?
• There is no mention of insurance but we should make sure that because the Board
would be on City property, the City is in all cases held harmless and properly
insured.
• The last paragraph indicates that the City will be given the opportunity to purchase
the Reader Board at cost plus interest. I assume that the City could decide not to
purchase the Board. Other than to participate in the revenue distribution, what
advantage to the City would it be to own the Board? I can not imagine the cash flow
from the Board being worth the City's involvement.
I would be happy to discuss these comments further with you.
F
<.rl
~i
DAril G seArrw"w. CPCt1. ARM
J. G. NEWMAN CO-
Insurance Managing General Agents
TELEPHONE (503) 226-6245
FAX (503) 273.8855
400 SW &k S.ar 1103 Portland Oregon 97104
City of Tigard
Ms Loreen Mills, Risk Manager
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, Oregon 97123
Re: Reader Board
Dear Ms. Mills:
aECEIVED
r r n 1 Q 1946
,Cr J. v
CITY OF TIGARD
September 16, 1996
This letter will serve as a response to your request directed to Ron Gmybeal at JBL&K and this
office on behalf of Northland Casualty Company regarding liability questions arising from the
proposed installation and use of an electronic reader board along Highway 99W in Tigard.
From your memo, my understanding is that the sign would be purchased and owned by the city,
located on city property, and insured by the city. The Downtown Merchants Organization would
sell time and space on the board as well as manage and control the content and displaying of
messages. All revenues would be retained by the merchants' organization.
t
1
t
The city's concern about creating traffic problems resulting from driver dis+r^action and
subsequent involvement of the city in lawsuits arising from traffic accidents is well founded, as
is the concern about liability arising from messages themselves and issues concerning access by
the public to the board. This second concern raises the more difficult issues. The city, as owner
of a public information forum such as the reader board, would not be completely free to pick and
choose who gets messages on the board, nor would it have sole discretion as to the content of
messages, even if the reader board is managed by others. Under this arrangement. I believe the
city would expose itself to claims and suits based on free speech issues, currently a very active
field for lawsuits under the first amendment to the state constitution in particular as public
entities seek to regulate signs of all kinds, as well as advertising by various businesses, such as
adult entertainment
Given the arrangement regarding- the reader board as outlined above, it would seem prudent to
1 require of those who are operating the sign and deriving revenue from it to obtain liability
coverage for personal and advertising injury, including publisher's errors and omissions coverage
for themselves, adding the city as an additional insured,while also agreeing to hold the city
r
7-]
1
7
a
ha less and indcriunif it for any or suits for damages or injunctive relief arising
Y out of
the operation and maintenance of the reader board.
Thank you for requesting our opinion and comments on this matter. I sincerely hope it will be of
value to you and the city as you work on this project. Please feel free to contact me if you have
any questions, or if I can be of any further service.
Sincerely.
i
/,tea.--~-✓
David G. Scherman, CPCU, ARM
i.
E
I
_ j
>I
Tigard Downtown Merchants Association
A Not for Profit Corporation
(503) 634-2975
12420 S. W. Main Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
i
0
March It. 1997
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Subject: Tigard Central Business District Visioning
The Association has prepared a broad list of items for consideration jointly with the
Council. The fact that these items are listed should not be taken as unanimous agreement
by Association participants as to their importance or priority. There are many mixed
feelings about what our Central Business District improvements should focus on.
1) As we saw during the tour of other communities, there are different approaches to
addressing parking issues. Recognizing the existence of benefits and costs associated
with each, we find that current zoning and code requirements can be very restrictive
on growth and improvement if not outright prohibitive.
In the overall discussion of parking, should private development of new buildings take
place, there is recognition that placement of building to the sidewalk with parking at
the rear will accomplish more pedestrian friendly downtown streets.
Feelings continue to run strong by some that in certain locations, time restricted
parking should be strictly enforced by the City. Voluntary compliance, particularly by
employers and employees, does not work in certain instances.
It is suggested that there be 'No Parking' posted on Main Street between Commercial
Street and the first Post Office driveway during heavy traffic times, such as 3:00 PM
to 5:30 PM daily and the Christmas holidays.
2) The Association continues to feel that Main Street is ready for traffic control at the
intersection of Burnham and Main. Recently, there was an occasion for temporary
stop signs to be placed at this intersection and it seemed to accomplish what we feel is
needed; slower traffic and better tragic flow. We propose a multiple month
experiment with temporary four way stop (accommodating the vehicles moving in and
out of the Main Street Car Wash as well) to evaluate the ramifications; then, if it
works, proceed with a simple four way flashing red light equipped with emergency
vehicle controls. We feel this can be accomplished with cost efficiency and support
from the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue.
3) One of Tigard's drawbacks is the lack of a street grid; Main Street traffic cannot easily
circle" without traveling clear to Hall Blvd. The suggestion is to connect Ash Avenue
at Burnham with Ash Avenue at Commercial. This would involve creating a railroad
crossing but doing this is not an impossibility. It should be noted that this idea is
mentioned without researching implications on existing properties.
4) With recognition that public facilities, such as the Post Office, bring people to
downtown, if the City should find occasion to relocate any of it's facilities,
# consideration should be given to the center of the Central Business District as possible.
The library would be one example of a public facility enhancing our downtown area.
5) In the effort to protect some of the small town, old tovm flavor, building design
restrictions and/or guidelines could be helpful. Certain types of construction may be
very harmful to the aesthetics and the ambiance which we have a tremendous
opportunity to build on. Additionally, requirements that building be built to the
sidewalks, pedestrian friendly windows, square footage restrictions, etc. can set the
stage for what our town will look like in twenty or more years.
6) In one community, we saw curb outs and street lights which create a pedestrian
friendly atmosphere where people like to walk and feel safe about it.
7) Different projects, endorsed by our community, require funding. Not all can be bom
by the taxpayers nor by the local property owners. In each area of consideration,
research may find that tar incentives, low interest loans, economic improvement
districts, local improvement districts, etc., could be used to provide necessary money
for the projects and/or encouragement of investment.
3) With the apparent new ownership of the part or all of the railroad right of way thru
Tigard, we might find new cooperation in an effort to clean up the right of way with
nice looking ground cover and trees (a parkway, if you will). There is presently
conversation about developing a commuter rail from Beaverton to Wilsonville along
these tracks with a possible stop in downtown Tigard; it would be good to participate
in this process given the many benefits Tigard might enjoy.
9) There is the ever present concern for what types of business might find our Central
Business District attractive. Can we be proactive in zoning and codes to encourage
businesses where we would take our families and friends, or must we wait for the
undesirables to find us like they have some of our neighbors with more gambling,
drinking, nude dancing, `C-rated materials and other non-family style activities.
r)
Tigard City Council
ivlarch 11, 1997
Page 3
10) A healthy discussion of the benefits and costs with designating our Central Business
District an Historical District with the restrictions that would accompany it.
11) The previous suggestion for a Reader Board is still alive with varying support.
Resolution of this matter needs to be finalized.
As stated, many of these ideas are presented with varying amounts of support and a
multitude of reasons for or against.
Combined with the diversity of thought is the usual amount of apathy or complacency by
some. These ideas are presented by people who are motivated by a sense of being part of
special place, a community, they have given their time and energy to making our
community a better place. But within the Central Business District there are others
motivated by self interest and making money without consideration for the impacts it has
on others. It does make it difficult to have progress when not all will give a little for the
benefit everyone.
We are hopeful that this City Council can envision a community they will be proud of for
many years to come and assist us wit;i the necessary actions, if not taking outright
leadership to do so.
Tigard Downtown Merchants Association
Council Agenda Item
For Agenda of 111 k t "7
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Bill Monahan, City Administrator
March 3,1997
COUNCIL CALENDAR, March through May 1997
Tues Budget Committee Meeting (6:30 p.m.)
Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
~I
Study Session
Business Meeting
Toes
Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Tues
Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Study Session
Business Meeting
j
Tues
Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Study Session
Business Meeting
Tues
Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Tues
Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Study Session
Business Meeting
Tues
Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) j
Study Session
Business Meeting
Tues
Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Mon
Memorial Day Holiday - City Offices Closed
Tues
Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)
Study Session
Business Meeting
Mcccal.doc
Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk If generally OK, we can
proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars.
i k
Agenda Item No. y f~
Meeting of 3~ I! let
TENTATIVE COUNCIL AGENDAS
FOR 1997
Tigard City Council Meetings
• Computer Network Update (Paul deB)
• Subdivision Compliance Agreements at Standards (Brian K.) €
Measure 47 Update (Wayne L.) C
TYPE: Business Meeting ( No TV)
6:30 p.m.
STUDY MEETING
Agenda Review
PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS
CONSENT AGENDA
Approve Council Minutes
7:30 p.m.
BUSINESS MEETING
TENTATIVE AGENDA
Tigard City Council Meeting
April 8, 1997
PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
CONSENT AGENDA
Approve Council Minutes
7:30 p.m.
BUSINESS MEETING
_ • Volunteer Recognition
0 Update - TVEDC - Mary Tobias
TYPE: Business Meeting (TV)
6:30 p.m.
STUDY MEETING
Agenda Review
ICMA Loan Program (Sherrie Burbank)
TENTATIVE AGENDA
Tigard City Council Meeting
April 15, 1997
TYPE: Workshop Meeting (NO TV)
7:30 p.m.
WORKSHOP MEETING TOPICS
o Wetlands Local Regulations - Goal 5 Draft (Duane R.)
i
i
J
I~
U
s
I
TENTATIVE AGENDA
Tigard City Council Meeting
April 22, 1997
TYPE: Business Meeting (TV)
6:30 p.m.
STUDY MEETING
Agenda Review
Solid Waste Efficiencies Task Force and Results of Haulers' Financial
Reports
F
{
PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
CONSENT AGENDA
Approve Council Minutes
7:30 p.m.
BUSINESS MEETING
• 99W Corridor Plan (Representatives from ODOT• Laurie N.
i
i
L
I
I
AGENDA ITEM #
For Agenda of 3/11/97
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Supplemental Budget o Streets cTp,
PREPARED BY: Wayne DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK 410Y
ISS B OR. THE OTN_T ,
Shall the City Council approve a Supplemental Budget to increase
appropriations for street capital improvement projects?
STAFF RR OMM•NDATTO
Staff recommends approval of the Supplemental Budget.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
When the 1996/97 budget was adopted in June 1996, the list of projects
approved in the CIP process for the state gas tax fund exceeded the amount
in the budget. In addition, several projects on the list have exceeded the
budgeted amount. Gus Duenas of the Engineering department has asked to
7
mend the budget to provide sufficient budget authority to complete the
rojects on the approved list.
The 1995196 audit indicated a larger than anticipated beginning balance for
the current year in the state gas tax fund in the amount of
$55,000. In
j
addition, we are predicting revenues in this fund to exceed budget by
$60,000. Other resources can be diverted from contingency in the amount of
$50,000 and the operating budget in the amount of $50,000 to the capital
improvements program in this fund. Taken all together, these adjustments
will provide an additional $215,000 in the CIP program in the state gas tax
fund. This will allow the Engineering department to proceed with the
approved projects.
The attached resolution makes the necessary changes to the 1996/97 adopted
i
budget to increase CIP appropriations by $215,000.
OTHER TT NATTVES CONSIDERED
Delay projects into next year.
FISCAL NOT
Increases CIP appropriations in the state gas tax fund by $215,000, f
decreases appropriations in the Public Works program by $50,000, decreases f
contingency by $50,000, and recognizes additional resources in the amount of III
115,000.
i
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
4
TO:
Bill Monahan
FROM:
Gus Duenas A-,/
DATE:
March 3, 1997
SUBJECT: Supplemental Budget for Streets CIP
This memo provides supporting information for the Supplemental Budget request for the Streets
CIP prepared by Wayne Lowry.
The 1996-97 Budget showed $778,000 available from the State Gas Tax for the Streets Capital
Improvement Program (See attached page 12 of the approved budget). The approved Capital
Improvement Program for the budget year totaled $896,000 (See attached page 145 of the approved
budget). To fully implement all the projects and expend the funds already approved required
$118,000 more than was available in the revenue projected. The major projects for the 1996-97
Fiscal year included Main Street and Commercial Street Reconstruction, Pavement Major I
Maintenance, the Speed Hump Program, 74th Avenue and Alfred Street Paving, and committed
projects from the previous fiscal year. f i
The following questions and answers are therefore presented in support of the $215,000 requested I
i_
to supplement the $778,000 originally available to fund the approved list of projects.
1. How will the $215,000 be spent? On what Projects?
The $215,000 will be spent as follows:
Committed Projects:
$
53,000
Main Street and Commercial Street:
$
611,000
PMMP (Includes Alfred & 74th):
$
304,000
79th Ave./Durham Signalization:
$
100,000
Speed Hump Program:
$
45,000
Total Project Expenditures:
$1
,113,000
Funds available from other sources:
$
100,000
Total Funds Required:
$1
,013,000
Funds available from budget:
$
778,000
Additional funds required:
$
235,000
1 010) Memorandum to Bill Monahan on CIP Supplemental Budget
Page 2
The actual funding required is $235,000 for full implementation of the projects already authorized
for FY 1996-97. However, only $95,000 out of the $100,000 is expected to be expended by June
30. In addition, the $15,000 in Speed Hump funding is for the 50% City funded element of the
program. So far, there has been no serious interest in the shared cost portion of the program. We
anticipate that the $15,000 will not be expended this fiscal year. Deducting the $20,000 from the
funds required leaves $215,000 needed to pay for the programs this fiscal year. The $5,000 for final
payment of the 79th Avenue/Durham Road Signalization will be carried forth as committed funds
for next fiscal year. There will be up to $50,000 in funding to be received from The Tigard-Tualatin
School District as reimbursement for their share in the signalization project. That funding can be
put back into pot for next year's CIP program as additional revenue. We do not anticipate billing
for that until the project is completed and all costs are known for that project.
2. Why were the projects over budget?
The following are projects that are over budget and the reasons for the additional amounts required
Main Street and Commercial Street Reconstruction: The original bid was $578,523.00, which is
already $18,523.00 over the budgeted amount. The contract was awarded at that amount.
Additional costs totaling $32,477.00 were for the following: additional select backfill material
required to implement design changes in Main Street and Commercial Street, pavement quantity
overrun on both streets, pavement grinding (not included in the plan) on Commercial Street so that
new pavement can match existing curb and gutter section, and removal and reconstruction of a
segment of Commercial Street (including sidewalk, curb, and planter strip) to correct grade
problems and provide proper connection to existing driveways. Design changes on Main and
Commercial Street were made to provide better transitions, smoother riding surface, and to adjust
cross slopes to conform to existing curb and gutter.
Pavement Major Maintenance Program: The amount originally bid for all the streets was
$355,769. We awarded this project at full bid amount with the understanding that two streets would
be eliminated from the list (Cascade Boulevard and 68th Avenue) to bring the expenditure to the
budgeted amount of $288,000. As work progressed, we discovered that the quantities estimated on
74th Avenue were almost twice as much as required. We therefore reinstated Cascade Boulevard.
During the project construction, there were utility adjustments, driveway connections, and shoulder
rock required to satisfactorily complete some of the streets and minimize future maintenance. The
additional amount required to complete all the projects, including Cascade Boulevard, is $16,000.
The total project cost for this project is $304,000.
The ROW acquisition for Greenburg Road was to be reallocated to cover the additional costs.
However, that funding was to come from the TIF Fund and could not be used to cover these costs.
1
0
Memorandum to Bill Monahan on CIP Supplemental Budget
Page 3
3. Will the projects be completed on time?
The projects have basically been completed, with minor items remaining on Main Street,
Commercial Street, and the PMMP projects. The Speed Hump Program project will be bid in
March and will be completed by the end of this fiscal year. The only project that will have
carryover funds is the 79th Avenue/Durham Road Signalization. The anticipated retainage ($5,000)
for items not completed is projected for payment after June 30 and will be budgeted in next fiscal
year's CIP budget.
I have been working closely with Wayne Lowry to ensure that the CIP projects for next fiscal year
do not exceed the revenue projections. Individual projects may exceed estimates based on actual
bids received, but my goal is to ensure that the overall budgeted amount for the Streets CIP is not
exceeded.
If you have any questions beyond those listed in this memo, please call me.
Attachments
cc: Greg Berry
Wayne Lowry
I ~ENG\GUSISUPBUDGT.DOC
10
i
1998.97 Adopted Budget
City Of Tigard, Oregon
Pmgnm Budget Matrix
Budget Units
General
Fu
d
Building
F
d
EledduI Sanltary Stone Water
I
Criminal
Stets Clay
County Traffic
Police
n
5,108
065
un
nspectln Sewer Sewer Fund
Ferfalt
Tax
Gas Tsx Imo Fps
Library
,
1,326.713
5.000
Social Sorvlcas/Ans 8 Events
82,500
-
Parks Maintenance
449380
-
Total Community Services
8968658
0
0 0 a
0
5,000
0
0 0
.
AdrN n
45.887
45.887 45.887 45,687
45
887
Sanitary Sew
Sewer
438,410
.
- -
Storm Sewer
385,426
Street Maintenance
Stlops Services
64
979
7
249
55,682
659 9
420,009
107,979
Property Management
,
163,912
,
4,203
226 6,590 28,733
10
50' 10
507 10
507
14,367
Water
Storm Clean up
,
,
,
3.332,044
10,507
Total Maintenance Services
274.778
11 452
659 504 030 Sad 092 3 417 171
0
490,770
107.979 0
AdmiNStration
224,069
140,592
61,509 4,394 4,394
4
394
Building Inspection
560,669
124,411
,
; -
Current Planning
287,057
6,173 6,173
9
I
Advance Planning
297,292
'
Engineering
Street Ughtlng
672.191
54,502 54.502
83,588
83 588
Total DevHOpmsnt Sarvicea
1.480.608
701,261
105920 65069
65
069 0
403 000
_
,
0
480,239
0 63588
M
ayor B City Council
57,137
6,530
1,632 10,863
8,707 13,060
8
707
2
177
-
- -
Human
City
Administration
Human Resour
235,628
4,152
1,038 41,520 33216 49,824
,
41,520
,
6304
ces ces
Risk Management
215,422
185248
16,732
19
000
4,683 12,488 9,366 26,538
4
750 19
00
18,732
6244
~
-
Msioning
55,900
,
0
,
,0
12,667 50,668
19,000
6,333
i
Flnarlce
Computer Systems
33,417
1
1
3,819
955 25,461 25,481 25,461
10,184
2,546
Accounting
1
,951
215
028
10,585
14
496
4,146 41,463 41,463 41,463
13,821
5,528
AtlrtUNStretlve Services
,
_ 468.688
,
5 143
2,416 72,481 72,481 72,481
1 288 10 285 10285 10 2
24,160
9,664
Total Policy & Admin
1,576,420
88 457
85
20 906 233 582 213848 289778
10285
f
0
146,410
40.797
0
:
T
Non l Operating
Total Operating Budget
255,357
10
553
8
29184
7,196 48,640 48,640
48 640
12.
9
728
,
,
21
830,355
214,761 851,321 831,447 3,755,589
5,000,
1,156,330 , _158,504 63,588
e
Debt Service
-
General CapitalImprovements
389,500
Capital Improvements
1,500,000 1,827,000 740,100
778.
2,300.000
r
Contingency
300,000
50,000
20,000 200.000 75,000 300.000
50.000
150,000
t.
Total BudgN
11,243,321
880,355
234,781 2,551,321 2,733,447 4,795,689
5,000
1,999,330
158,504 2,513,588
1111
-
Total Revenue
Prolocted EFS 1998/97
14,713,350
923, 920
283M1 4 502 276 2 781 081 9135 647
43 000
1999 330
168 028 2 480
3,470,029
43,565
48 250 2,030,955 47,634 4.339.958
38,000
(0)
8,322 71 696
Estimated M7 Revenues
Prolected 96/97 Beginning Balance
11,337,850
3
375
S0
823,920
220,600 1,511,100 1,678,450 4,186,780
26,000
1,645,000
151,500 1,331,150 tits
Adopted TotalRwenus
,
,
0
14
713
350
100 000
923
920
62 431 3 071 176 1 102831 4948 887
2
7,000
354,330
15 328 11,254,()
3
_
.
.
,
83031 4582276 2.781081 9135847
43,000
1999330
I
166826 2585480
i
1
I
12
I
1
i
-
i
1996/97 Adopted Budget
City of Tigard, Oregon
Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
Adopted
Estimated
Estimated
Estimated
Estimated
Funding Source/Project
1996197
1997/98
1998/99
1999/00
2000/01
State Gas Tax
Committed Projects
Transportation Study
23,000
99W Study
16,000
79th/Durham Signal
43,289
ii
79th Ave. preliminary design
10,000
3
Major Maintenance
28,000
I:
+
Bull Mountain Road
8,000
!
I
Now Projects
Major Maintenance
223,711
300,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
Alfred Street Paving
30,000
74th Ave Paving (Bonita to Durham)
35,000
i
Main Street Reconstruction
260,000
`
Commercial Street Reconstruction
200,000
79th Ave/Durham Signal
6,000
Speed Hump Program
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
791h Avenue
107,000
Pedestrian Improvements Park/Watkins
160,000
Traffic Study
30,000
North Dakota Bridge
158,000
148,084
239,135
200,000
_
3
^
r~ J1
Pedestrian Improvements
Bumham/Main Signal
50,000
80,000
50,000
50,000
HaIVHunziker/Scoff ins
50,023
Total State Gas Tax Projects
896,000
800,000
623,084
634,135
645,023
i
`
1
Traffic Impact Fee
t
Committed Projects
j
TIF Transit Reserve
359,000
109th Avenue South of Naive
110,000
130th Avenue Scholis to Hawks Beard
300,000
130th Winterlake Bridge
575,000
Bonita Road
25,000
f
Burnham Street
10,000
New Projects
TIF Transit Reserve
89,000
70,000
54,000
45,000
35,000
Walnut/Tiedeman right of way
75,000
Greenburg Road right of way
200,000
Greenburg/Mapleleaf Intersection
50,000
a
TIF Reserve
507,000
341,933
538,675
482,509
373,135
Bonita Road RR to Bridge
400,000
Bumham/Main Signal
40,000
Total Traffic Impact Fee Projects
2,300,000
811,933
632,675
527,509
408,135
`T
33
t
145
1
i-
3
~ ul lc. t .f tom- C~v~.~_l CC tt<.~=c~~
lei
AGENDA ITEM # 1 ~
y
FOR AGENDA OF 3/11/97
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Budget Adjustment for Urban Services Proenm
PREPARED BY: Wayne DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK Gtod'h^
j
ISSUE BEFORE THE O N I
Shall the City Council approve a budget adjustment to provide budget authority for the Urban Services program
for the months of May and June 1997?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the attached budget adjustment.
INFORMATIONS TTviMARY
The City and the County have been negotiating an intergovernmental agreement under which the City will
provide planning, engineering and Building inspection services in the adjacent unincorporated areas. The
County is willing to transfer funds on May I to fund the start up of this program and to. provide funding for the
projects in process at that time. The City will also be entitled to revenues from fees and permits from this area
the balance of the fiscal year and into the future.
The provision of these services in this area beginning May 1 1997 will require the hiring of nine positions.
These positions were not included in the current 1996/97 budget and therefore must be provided for in the
attached budget adjustment. In addition, some capital equipment and materials and services will also be
necessary for use by the new employees.
The projected costs of this program for the remainder of the 1996/97 fiscal year will be accounted for in a newly
established Urban Services Fund. Revenue in this fund will be the amount transfered to the City from the
County estimated at $150,000 for the specific purpose of providing these services and any permits sold in May
and June for developments in the Urban Services area estimated at $79,000.
The attached resolution establishes the Urban Services Fund, recognizes the anticipated revenues and
establishes appropriations in the various programs for this effort.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Delay implementation into next fiscal year.
t FISCA . NO
Establishes new Urban Services Fund, recognizes revenue in the amount of $229,000, sets up program
appropriations in the Urban Services Fund in the amount of $150,000 for the remainder of the 1996/97 fiscal
year.
■
r- I
CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION ADJUSTING THE 1996i97 ADOPTED BUDGET FOR SERVICES PROVIDED TO
THE URBAN SERVICES AREA.
WHEREAS, The Tigard City Council is anticipating the signing of an Intergovernmental Agreement with
Washington County to provide development services certain areas of the County adjacent to the City which
services are projected to begin May 1, 1997, and,
WHEREAS, The 1996/97 budget did not anticipate the provision of these services and therefore must be
amended to provide budget authority to spend funds to provide such services, and,
WHEREAS, Local budget law allows the Council to adjust the budget by resolution when funds are
transferred to the City for a specific purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: A new Fund is created entitled
the Urban Services Fund. This fund will be used to record all revenues and expenditures resulting from
activities in the Urban Services area.
SECTION 1: Revenues are recognized in the amount of $229,000.
I SECTION 2: Expenditures in the Urban Services Fund are appropriated as follows:
Community Development Program
CD Administration S 8,735
Building Inspection $ 91,100
Current Planning S 17,550
Engineering $ 17,400
Contingency S 15.215
Total $150,000
PASSED: This _day of 1997.
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
i ~cinuidcrosolm.dot
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
Page i
1
t
I
' -7-c, LQSJ ,tee I
AGENDA ITEM # r, a
FOR AGENDA OF=_''_~y1I lR~7
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE A Resolution Am nding the existing FYI 996-97 SalarvSchedule for Management
and Professional Group to add the new classifications of Tgrt,n r
1 Services Specialist at~arv Range 52A. and
Ids tion Supervisor. at Sala_rv Range 60 i
PREPARED BY: Sandy 7odrow DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE OiTNC'Ti ,
1
Should the City Council act to amend the existing FYI 996-96 Salary Schedule for Management and
Professional Group Employees by adding the new classifications of Technical Services Specialist, Range 52A,
and Inspection Supervisor, Range 60.
j STAFF RECOMMENDATION
i
Amend the existing FY 1996-97 Salary Schedule for Management and Professional Group Employees as shown
' n Exhibit A attached to the Resolution
i
INFORMATION SUMMARY
a
Based on a request from the Library Director, Human Resources staff have reviewed the duties and
responsibilities of the current position of Microcomputer Support Technician. This position is proposed to
continue to perform its current duties as well as assume the duties and responsibilities of a full supervisor over
the Technical Services Division. The Library Director has proposed this change to accomodate some
i restructuring that is being done to deal with current and anticipated staff shortages.There is no current
classification which appropriately fits these proposed duties, therefore Human Resources is recommending the
i creation of a new class to correctly describe the functions, responsibilities and requirements. The Technical
Services Specialist is proposed at Salary Range 52A.
Human Resources has also reviewed the proposed new classification of Inspection Supervisor. As part of the
assumption of inspection functions in the May 1, 1997 urban services agreement with Washington County, the 1
Building Division of Community Development will be hiring an additional four (4) inspectors, bringing a total
i of eleven (11) inspectors to this division. The Building Official currently serves as the supervisor for these
positions. The Department has indicated that this represents too large of a manageable number of direct reports, I
and does not allow the Official adequate time to perform his managerial functions. They have requested the
creation of a supervisor to assist in this area. The new classification of Inspection Supervisor at Range 60,
'-'vould assume supervisory responsibility over the Inspectors, performing the full range of supervisory duties.
t
0
~
i
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 97- b
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE EXISTING FY1996-97 SALARY SCHEDULE FOR
MANAGEMENT AND PROFESSIONAL GROUP TO ADD THE NEW CLASSIFICATION OF
TECHNICAL SERVICES SPECIALIST AT SALARY RANGE 52A, AND THE NEW
a
CLASSIFICATION OF INSPECTION SUPERVISOR AT SALARY RANGE 60
f
WHEREAS, the duties and responsibilities of one position in the Library have been reviewed by Human
Resources and the creation of a new classification of Technical Services Specialist at salary range 52A has
1
been recommended;
WHEREAS, the duties and responsibilities of a proposed new position in the Community Development
Department, Building Division, have been reviewed by Human Resources and the creation of a new
classification of Inspection Supervisor at salary range 60
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the existing FYI 996-97 Salary Schedule for Management and Professional
Group Employees to be amended to reflect the additional of the new classifications;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
SECTION 1: An amended FY 1996-97 Salary Schedule for Management and Professional Group
Employees reflecting the addition of Technical Services Specialist at Salary Range 52A, and Inspection
Supervisor at Salary Range 60, is attached hereto and identified as Exhibit A:
SECTION 2: The Council orders the adoption of the amended FY 1996-97 Salary Schedule fur
i
Management and Professional Group Employees
t
PASSED: This 11th day of March 1997.
i
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-_
Page 1
L
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL GROUP
SALARY SCHEDULE FOR 199611997
t
RANGE
CATEGORY
CLASSIFICATION TITLE
PAY RANGE
43
M3
Confidential Executive Assistant
Hourly
$12.28
-
$16.45
Monthly
$2,128
-
$2,851
Annually
$25,541
-
$34,218
44A
M4
Library Volunteer Coordinator
Hourly
$12.59
-
$16.87
M4
Library Technical Services Coordinator
Monthly
$2,183
-
$2,925
M3
Micro Computer Support Technician
Annually
$ 26,191
-
$35,104
45
M3
Assistant Planner
Hourly
$12.92
-
$17.31
Executive Assistant to City Administration
Monthly
$2,239
-
$3,000
Human Resources Technician
Annually
$26,865
-
$36,003
Circulation Supervisor
Risk Technician
46A
M4
Buyer
Hourly
$13.24
-
$17.76
M3
Police Records Supervisor
Monthly
$2,296
-
$3,077
Annually
$27,551
-
$36,926
48
M3
Development Services Supervisor
Hourly
$13.94
-
$18.67
Monthly
$2,416
-
$3,236
Annually
$28,987
-
$38,836
50A
M3
Fleet Services Coordinator
Hourly
$14.66
-
$19.64
Youth Services Specialist
Monthly
$2,540
-
$3,405
Annually
$30,485
-
$40,859
51A
M3
Associate Planner
Hourly
$15.03
-
$20.15
Budget & Financial Reporting Analyst
Monthly
$2,606
-
$3,492
Annually
$31,271
-
$41,907
52A
M2
Wastewater Operations Supervisor
Hourly
$15.42
-
$20.66
Water Operations Supervisor
Monthly
$2,673
-
$3,582
Grounds and Streets Supervisor
Annually
$32,070
-
$42,981
Technical Services Specialist
53
M3
Human Resources Analyst
Hourly
$15.81
-
$21.19
Monthly
$2,741
-
$3,673
Annually
$32,894
-
$44,080
55A
M3
City Recorder
Hourly
$16.63
-
$22.29
Monthly
$2,884
-
$3,865
Annually
$34,605
-
$46,377
56A
M2
Library Division Manager
Hourly
$17.06
-
$22.87
Monthly
$2,958
-
$3,964
Annually
$35,491
-
$47,563
57
M3
Senior Human Resources Analyst
Hourly
$17.50
-
$23.45
Senior HRlfetecommunications Analyst
Monthly
$3,034
-
$4,064
Annually
$36,402
-
$48,773
V.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL GROUP
SALARY SCHEDULE FOR 1996/1997
GMT
RANGE
CATEGORY
CLASSIFICATION TITLE
PAY RANGE
58
M2
Project Engineer
Hourly
$17.96
-
$24.05
Operations Division Manager
Monthly
$3,112
-
$4,170
Property Division Manager _
Annually
$37,338
-
$50,034
Utility Division Manager
Administrative Services Manager
59
M2
Planning Supervisor
Hourly
$18.59
-
$24.67
Plans Examination Supervisor
Monthly
$3,191
-
$4,276
Annually
$38,287
-
$51,308
60
M2
Senior Management Analyst/Risk
Hourly
$18.88
-
$25.30
Inspections Supervisor
Monthly
$3,273
-
$4,386
Annually
$39,273
-
$52,631
61
M2
Planning Manager
Hourly
$19.37
-
$25.96
Financial Operations Manager
Monthly
$3,357
-
$4,498
Annually
$40,285
-
$53,979
64
M2
Building Official
Hourly
$20.89
-
$27.99
Engineering Manager
Monthly
$3,621
-
$4,853
Annually
$43,455
-
$58,236
66
M2
Assistant to the City Administrator
Hourly
$21.98
-
$29.45
Network Services Director
Monthly
$3,810
-
$5,105
Lieutenant
Annually
$45,715
-
$61,257
68
M2
Human Resources Director
Hourly
$23.12
-
$30.98
Monthly
$4,007
-
$5,370
Annually
$48,087
-
$64,440
69
M2
Police Captain
Hourly
$23.71
$31.78
Monthly
$4,110
$5,508
Annually
$49,323
$66,101
70
M7
Library Director
Hourly
$24.32
-
$32.59
Finance Director
Monthly
$4,215
-
$5,649
City Engineer
Annually
$50,584
-
$67,786
72
M1
Public Works Director
Hourly
$25.58
-
$34.28
Community Development Director
Monthly
$4,435
-
$5,942
Annually
$53,218
-
$71,306
73
M1
Police Chief
Hourly
$26.24
$35.16
Monthly
$4,548
$6,095
Annually
$54,578
$73,141
Pe e 2
H:\DOCS\MNGTSLRY.XLS
`
i
_
4
t
( .
I
f
r
i
I
II
I AGENDA ITEM #
1997
FOR AGENDA OF M
h 11
arc
.
>:3 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON
aj COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE ZOA 96-0005 (Tigard Triangle Design Standards Text Amendment)
PREPARED BY: Nadine Smith DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMINOK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Should the City Council adopt design standards for the Tigard Triangle?
i
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council direct staff to prepare a land use order to adopt design standards for the
Tigard Triangle.
i INFORMATION SUMMARY
_
i
On December 17, 1996, the City Council held a public hearing to consider comprehensive plan and zoning
-
.,,,mendments to implement a Mixed Use Employment zone in the Tigard Triangle. City Council approved the
comprehensive plan and zoning map and zoning text amendments and a final order was prepared and adopted
i -
by City Council on December 30, 1996 adopting those amendments. City Council left the public hearing open
to allow consideration of text amendments to implement design standards for the Tigard Triangle and directed
staff to pursue design standards with the Tigard Triangle Task Force.
f
Four meetings have been held with the consulting team, staff and the Triangle Task Force to consider design
standards. Standards have been developed for street design, building design and location, setbacks,
3 landscaping, entry features, signing, and lighting in the Triangle.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
i
Not adopting design standards for the Triangle.
1
- S
FISCAL NOTES
1
No direct fiscal impact at this time.
i
- APLNWADINEAZOA9605.SUM
v
I
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD
TO: City Council
FROM: Nadine Smith, Planning Supervisor
DATE: March 4, 1997
SUBJECT: Tigard Triangle Design Standards (Addendum to ZOA 96-0005)
On December 17, 1996, the City Council adopted a new zoning designation of Mixed Use
Employment, new Comprehensive Plan language and amended the Transportation Map within the
Tigard Triangle. The public hearing was left open on the text amendment to allow staff to work
i,~with the consultants and the Triangle Task Force to dev::iop design standards for the Triangle. No
further amendments to the comprehensive plan are proposed. -
The attached document incorporates the design standards that have been developed with the
consensus of the Task Force in a series of four meetings. They are intended to refine and add to
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 96-0005. f
I ~
j Tigard Triangle Street Plan
a
i
Tigard Triangle March 4, 1997
Design Standards per Task Force meeting on 3/3/97
18.070 Design Standards
Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation
projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address
several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a
high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway
system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape : o create a high quality image for the
area.
All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in non
single family residential uses, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the
area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development
standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be
required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary
sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and
pubfic improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle.
The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard
Triangle within both the C-G and the MUE zones. If a standard found in this section
conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall
govern.
A. Street Connectivity. All development must demonstrate how one of the
following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be
approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such
as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and
rivers prevent street extensions and connections.
1. Desin Option
a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of
no more that 660 feet.
b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall
be provided at intervals of no more that 330 feet.
2. Performance Option
Mixed Use Employment District 1 Design Standards
Spencer & Kupper
Lloyd D. Lindley. ASLA
Cogan Owens Cogan
v
1 Tigard Triangle March 4. 1997
Design Standards per Task Force meeting on 3/3/97
a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street
intersections per mile.
b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a
a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance.
1 c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a
collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-
line distance
B. Site Design Standards. All development must meet the following site design
standards. If a parcel is one acre or larger a phased development plan must be
approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met.
Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section
18.134.050 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied.
I. Building placement on Major and Minor Arterials and the street - Buildings
shall occupy a minimum of 50% of all street frontages along Major and
Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street
intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. See Diagram 1 for
some examples of how this standard may be met. -
2. Building setback - The minimum building setback from public street rights- i
of-way or dedicated wetlandsibuffers and other environmental features,
shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet.
3. Front yard setback design - Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced t
expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and
a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one street, the
required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall
be developed to an L-1 standard on public streets and an L-2 standard on
accessways. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete
or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are
encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping
requirement per Section 18.62.050 (A) 6.
4. Walkway connection to building entrances - A walkway connection is
required between a building's entrance and a public street or accessway.
Mixed Use Employment District 2
Spencer & Kupper
Lloyd D. Lindley, ASLA
Cogan Owens Cogan
Tigard Triangle March 4, 1997
Design Standards per Task Force meeting on 3/3197
This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with scored
concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near
a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to
the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.62.050 (A) 6.
5. Parking location and landscape design - parking must be located to the side
or rear of ncwly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is
limited to 50 percent of the street frontage, and must be behind a
landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum
depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building
setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be
landscaped to a L-2 Landscape Standard, except where a side yard abuts a
public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard.
See Diagram 2.
C1
C. Building Design Standards. All non-residential buildings shall comply with the
following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the
criteria found in Section 18.134.050 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied.
1. Ground floor windows - All street-facing elevations within the Building
Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50%
of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway
openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three feet
above grade to nine feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing
elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the
ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level.
Up to 50% of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an
adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building
corner.
2. Building facades - Facades that face a public street shall extend no more
than 50 feet without providing at lease one of the following features: (a) a
variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least 1 foot; (c) a
wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection,
such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the
building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than
300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building.
Mixed Use Employment District 3 Design Standards
Spencer & Kupper
Lloyd D. Lindley. ASLA
Cogan Owens Cogan
;u
1 i
I
i
I
.Cuado~a°1mmgy
a1n7,CrJado.y
,•'n~ n 1 ~ ~
o ~ ~
$ ~ °c' ~ of ~ ~i a,
~ ~ N
~ ,1 y 1 ~i a ~
I ~ ~ b ' ~ o
6 ~ U
h ~ ~ ~CiJado ~117n ~ 'F'' ti a
~ ~
- 'E- CY v by a
o laa~S 1mo7 ;`i ~
r arn7.Cl~ado.rd am7,Cl.rado~ i-1 0
E..i a
L i f ~ a
. i Rt ae d tie ~ ~ • bA. ~
~ ~ ~o o fi vt ~ ti ~ Sc o ~ d
n ~ ~ ~ I I i3 ~ ~ c a o o I m I ~ .h
N e,o 0 1 ~ I `o n 'n 1 0. I
~ m ~ ' '3 0 ~ ~ ~ 1
• ~ f a ouumtm8 ~ ~
L__-~
jvual~y lovlyy to ~o•oyy .
oarnrs~ Agenda d 4
1 of 11
,
•
If this notice appaars dearer than the ~ { AUG 2 41998 , , 'ddocument, the document is of marginal gnaiifi, ~ I L
M CROFI MED
L:. 4. "1 7 ~ll_-f: u "s 1t • •:1 -_::.II ,:'.10 11 _ - 1B_
IlII111llllfi~I11I111I1111dI1dIIlIjI[Illflli~l~(liilll~l(1((f1l(IIIflllill~llifiilll~lllli[1il~lllll(IIW[IIIIIIIhlllll~IiIIIIUI~It[lllil~IfUU1t~Ulllllli~lllllllllllllllllllfi11f1 ID iinTui~ui<uallu ~ ~ ~ii~~ .
' •
;:v1.:
n~
r
m
C tl .S ~ ~ r ~
4y m C .D .bo '
~..si a ~y - o
w
e ~ ~
1 d ~ fib ~ v] G ~ h ~ ~
Ge ri _ I i~ '.ry. 1 h~'~
~ - ~1~A11
fi p W O
g o 0 9 ~I C "•,c ~ o~ ~'dN a
o~.o ~
N ~ ~ H ~ a
~ laagspnao7 ~ :"a
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ •N A ~ q n ,y am7 d7~ado.rd i-i o
d i , ~ ~ i W E-~I a
1 a v ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ e bA ~ ; o
I y b R ~ fu v h a ey ~ h d a
c o, h ° ~
~ i e o N cp •n
eo ~ i ~ , ~ ~ ~N ~ m
$ ° ~'!PnnB 7 ,
~a _ N - .
jouatly ~ougq ~o ~o• vyy ;
oarnra~ Agenda#4
2of i1
4 • U this notice appams dearer lhan Hce AUG 2 41998 , , `idacument, the dncumon. is of marginal ,unlit}.
MICROFILMED t Iil~d i
INCR ..MACE CiW - - . ~ 1 °S2 a f Fr 11 u ,q'_ K 75 a.'. if 1',`.- 11 I1:-',., ~
~hummfmcomlammdiui~mi~tuuiu ~fula~loi iiihm~iu~uuiiiifiiiuut umiul _ _ ~ aumul~ml~~luuliudamuu~luu~uuxuiualuuiiuiViam~Ga~ z ~ma m~Tiui~uuua ~iuu
•
. r.
r
~ ~ ~ ° ° fl ~ n, ~ - ~o a ~ ~ ,
~ ° a o, ~ ~p-__ o t ~ 4 ° ~ o
p - C~ : U yO 60 Q g pJ ° C r~~. y
~ ~~~^^^ddd°°° . C ~ . p I ~ - ' p-I v p a a _ ib_
P .~o 0 ' '.i..i UUU
a aoa~ uu ~ ~ a 9 B q pF0 3 1 i~ 6 p .V o . 1 ~ d i~ ~ Q t~~ o Q D p;10 ~ ;,,,i ~ U
° ~ a Q p ',r~•1 ~ it
p 01 O ~
o o p E..., ~ a. o f ~ 'a,:
Q~ i ~ 0 ~ , y..
i ~ a,
r ~ 0 0 w m A cC ~ ,
0 00 0 'H °o m H ~ , i ~ 0. ` •r, ~ a~i v .
'o F m o R1 y
pop ~ o ~ e E~ ~ o ~ - ,
v~ U F F ....1
o3~f t>9~ '
Agenda#4 - 3of 71
i ?r ~
If this notice appe5rs clearer than the ~ AUG 2 41995 "document, the document is of marginal quaiih~ ~ IL
MICROF MED
- -iI r °.,t r 7~-:~ _ ~ -t n ~ it trx° u ne fe t n u _ _ _ u.
IIWUIWIIIfI11111IH[((Ill~tlllfli(l~Jf1lIIIU UUlllf IIIU}I[IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~iC(lllillfl(1(illiil[llIIIIlI1[liUlli~lIIIIIIIIVIIUIIII~fItUll~U1tl1111~11(IIl81IIIfIIUill~lifi i m Ol If>Irllil~IDUttll<fi1111 Ullll
' ~ '
- , , - -
~
° a ~7 q ~
d 1 ~ ' ~ ~ Q n Ln0 a ~ 0 m ~ ~ O
4 o a d 4 V 0
°~o o ad ~ ,~4 w 0 p ~ q ^ ~ A~
d g 8 pP _ _lb q`
a a' . p a o a a' a a a OO•I a ~ ~ 4 8~ Q b ap ~ ♦ N ~
' B ,~i0 0 P u p P~fl p p Q ~
o ~ Q; ♦ o X041001.LOQ0[~ 4 p o ~ } f ~ v v+
o o . O a a 0 0
0 0° ° ~ p 00 N C~ ..e A ~ O a o o a 0 .rl U v 0 Q i o
° >t o 0 I° - o r:~ a O e a ° o ~ v~ 'H ,
t°. 000 I:rl . o
o p Op0 CC3 ~
~ O 000 •a i , ~ ~ 000 ~ ~ c
Q a ~ v .a ~ a
~ ~ o ~ ~
•v " v ~ o o a a; H , [ ~ ~ U rn ~ F a •
.•1 ~ ~ a a w" O a ,
•
03/11197 -
Agenda # 4 bof 17
. i 'r1 •
If the notice appaars clearer th;m the - AUG 2 ¢ 1998 I : ~ •T +dacument, the document is of marginal ,uaiih•' { MI ROFILMED
C
4 . - ~ t , = r;: s _ ~ _ -,t ata u _ tr-~r _ tr •ts;-:, a .n a t4 , , _ _ _
llul8lulllii IIIIHItlilldiuillll~Ift[IIIII iI11111I tlii~lflI1IIIII~IIIIiili(II Il~ili1111tI111111111iiilillll(hllih(li~uillli(1I1I181111~fuUlU~I1IIIluIIfIIUIIl1IiI111lIllVllil ImCu lnduli6ulluuGuliun i~ullh
• _ -
1:
o ~ . a ~
C ~ a ~ •M a
~ G u .b ~ m i u ri ~
'tr ° ~ ~ ; •f3
L y Q ~ d a h se ~ f .o c
v .J eo
0
A Q 3
~ o { O ~o C Ell 7 ~ ~
7 'v ~ N U n o
P N Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 6~ O a
' ~ n ~ ~ ,N
o r^ .o ~O ~ l ~ d w 'C 4 ~ ~ vl C t , r.
•3 ~ •7 A 'n -r ~ ~ ..t q ' ~
~,C~ r
3 ` ~ ~ ~ 3 ~G ~ c~ ~
'Cbp 0 y •5 p A Sa 1l ~~1~{f ~
L1i 15 a ° Ci t oo rn . A 0 c
o
a p
~ ~ ~ _ Z ~ N ~ .C u , ~ ~
3 3
d'
` 4 V1 O h ~
i i ~ a ~ ~
maw w mo
~ ~ Q N
' _ I ~ -i1
If this notice appanrs clearer than the AUG 2 1996 4 jdocument, the document is of marginal ,uaiih, 'j MICROFILMED
i INCN NAVE IN IifNN ..'RSA'--_„ -v, -xr~~, _ - -'-1 - _ rE_... I , _ _ 'i- _ -e -t ,tr-..: I: •>s~ . w is r- a ; : to n:: - .-u _ _ ~
dumuullu mluu~md~uiiur~u~in► u~~~~1ui }tdu» iimhui►tiiif fiui~u - ~i i iluu~ui ~ ul~u~tl[ulmiluulm~luu~~upaulu~iimduuiiuiluumu~iit i ~ IT ln~llltiu~uullu ~ml~u
' •
N C
7
U ,OC -
i A C
O id ! 1 U l
O l N a ~ m
C C`P ~ , a, ~ r ~ y
ea ~ t ~ 'ro" r--~ v ~ ~ (r 3
s ~ a a o G o ' N ~ '°0 e ~ m c O~^~, ~ ~
m y. a> v. d ~ u a o d, ~ ~ c , ¢ > N ~ ~
~ ~b CL o° o c ~ ~ a
~ .r + ~ O h w y ~ Y~ Q' m T
C ~ m> ~eo a ~ ~ ~
d Gq ~ 0 ^ E E ~ ~ c e ' R'3 ~ Gl ~
w ~ a ~ c~ x
° ~ r bA ~ ~
'a 6~ z •7~ y ~J 0 y ~ W ry ~ N
~ L 1 ~ D ~
W bL o a r i
y o
y G~ ~ c
3 . a. CO u u
~ •a
~ ' F
i,, ' i. a
rna~
oQm
If this notice appaa~s clem'er than the ` AUG 2 1996 ~ : ~ ' c'.document, the document is of marginal ,uaiih { 4
• ~ MICROFILMED ~ ~ t
~ INCH .I 'MACE CI d - _ _ . 1 m52 3 1-- ~ -,i it - It 13 x.. _
t<lllllllll~IIIIIIIIINl1(Gldllltlllll II 4 u "~s.::n :~•=ie n_~ ~E._ _ so ~f~llfl llilll(~lll[II~IIIIpiIlOllllflillll~li[111f1llllillllll111111111~IIIIIfIiIII1111111Vi1111111~i111UII~AIIIIIIlUlfillllllllltlffll~lhli Hil ~i ~f lll i(IIG111~llU0.pllllllll UIIII
i_
4
o m ~ o ^ m
° 0 ~ e h r C'
in
eo oho ~ ~ U
~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ 4 p ~ r-~ gv3
4~ 0 D 4 Qi d
` ~ m m Q~ U.
~ ~ m ~ , ~ -
D) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a .
- ~ c ~°°v ~~r~.
~ d ~ a~.~ 0 b . ~ ~ ~
Q ~ U ,o
D eo ,a. ~ a c ~ ~ . t/1
~ 4 o a ~ v a
o C~ - ~ ~ ~
a
u o ° rn
i~ i ~ . , ~ ~
e ~fi ~ .y
Z
' ~ u
y~ qa„
- ~ O10 :OQI~
•~n
If this notice appzars clearer than the ' ' pUG 241998 .','document, the document is of marginal quaiih•.
MICROFILMED t
~ Tel ' . f~_., !,L~ _ _i~ G. [ _ _ I _ _ Iii; __ir~ .at u -,:;r
[lu[~uuh[i[ udil~fu[dm[[il1[~[I~[tl ti[[l n~i~iiul~[[Ii[[[Diu[lu[iliiifl[il[i[[Iui[luull[i[lu[[l[ui~ii- u~[[ - [ [ _ _ nlmm f11IlI~~uUtlf)IJUIIIUItllllull~I1IIWIlllllifl[~ i r [[gym [at~u~u~un~u [►u[[6
• i_ ,
i
c,
a o,
'o
fi ~ 5
~ N d y ~ o
~ 3 I a ~ U y a
~ ~ ~r rl ~ d 3 :_t.
i 8 ~ o
d o 0 0 ~ ~ U
u $ ~ d .1 C " ~ ~ 0 .a ~ ^ .M Ez ~ i ~ .N
pp 4 W:.i ~ a
:e`e W U '
ro ~ is ti a $..I a/ o
n ~ CY $ ~ Q a U y ~ > 3 rN` a ;.h a
' ~ ° ti ~ LUrll'V ~ N `V ~ V ~i '
~ ~ i ~ ~ m ~ z a
C h ~ ~ O
r u
~ I
r N y d
u u
d '
v n#
mn i mo
o¢m
If this notice appam•s clearer than the AU6 2 41998 document, the document is of marginal ,uaiiti•. ;i
MICROFILMED i ~ .J
INCR j MACE W ~ r - ~ - : ~ , . R l~ - . r
IIIIWIWIll~IIIINfllllll{Illl(fh~ffl[Iffll~lflll f(II4II~II~~Iilll~lli(IIII1Glliff~fllllllliilllllllll~l~lfllti~l[IIIIfIJII(ltlflll[111fUI1~U111fIII~111tlIII~iIIllI111I1ufi1 .ID I1llITi1lI)Utlllll(l~ll (VIII
.
_ - _
-f': : '
f,,,
_ - ' ~
.u .v w
~
~ ;ti ,
a 0.
.a
~ ~ ~ ~ 5 N~~„~Yl~~~ SaoF... j ~ 9 ~
.~G❑ o
-7 'ou ffi~ o'n vm v'u d~aoffio`°- :c uu9 I :u.:~`., v:avv.a;g'v'v' vva $ v ~u ~ o '5 ,
cEec6cEkEe~e D°•c ~v•~•~v vw~' ~ . ~u`v ~v ~~8iv~a~~'~~v ~i~~ra,d 'O ogav _ ~ i~
uu~ v° wv vu vv~'`~osi;oBSy°~'" °~'i» r ~ --,m:". ' muaamuwuwVw•Scaa'~ww"a~~~.5~ ~O3v~ T N v
(q u d d d u ti u ti ff u ti u u " u u ,P', °p~ y A ~ 6'o H ~ ~ r~-t'Gi.
V odo do eddo6 o dd ~,do ,~~cc ~ I-+ ww w w wwww w w w c.w yy p t, /~~I/~
E"~ C rt` r N N NN N N r r N N 1~N r9jD ~~7 t~ y ~ .I ~~y }N~ ~y ~ L N N ry N N N N N N N N N N ~ N N :a ~ ~y~n^ v v+ ' ~
y o,3zr~. F ~ ~ O ~ c N.
VJ ccc a ~e ae ~ N cc ~~a V 'O
vi E" 333 3 ~ ~ o 9~na ~ r.a m
~ ~ tiati 6ti Ev Etiti ti E v v'7 •r o ~ o0 0?0 oo=mob o o ~3 ~ 0`~7 ,~"'oa ~ ~ ~~i y~:.
cd ~ : ~ , 07 f0 W U07 Uf0 U10 W ¢1 viU WIAU c +-r ~ Rj g
V1 ~fi v f~7 p
~ ~ ~ - u ~
~y ~ E~i ~ p C y C C a' Ei J, 'J t~tl ~ ~ '
V VJ O> ~ 0 C~0 f/~J y CO 'C C u Q~ ~ N
q .o Q ~ e P1 ~ y° y a y ° ~ ~ '
.ry ' ~ 'f7
N ' ~ ~ ' a
~ 'Cy
v n#
• m m ~ ~a~ n ~`o
o¢m
~ ~ . If ~ s r .i
If this notice appavs.clearer :h;m the ` ~ 2 isse i • { AU 4 ,s document, the document is of marginal quality, ~ I~CROFILI~D
_ . ' ti
t ' ti I . I ,;t ' IRCR ' MADE Rl4IR& ~ u_'' . _ "c , x ~~i F., i r:~, .e=__ _ _ t< y _ .rr.:.tt _r. tc ~ts.._n i~,•;,to u;: _.-ac_~~ _ w
iluiiiuulm uiluidiiidiili►u~taiiiiii~[~ur~iiiiiiiidiiutunfuuiiufiui~u>Iioiiiiiihmiiiuliu~iirlluuliu~u~uiiGiuu~ulumiiii~imi~uluuiuu~~~ ~ r i ~it~ui~ui~uul~u>>ii~~ ~ul~tu
'y
4 ,
~T;
I ' I,p v o
~ \ ~ U ~l " r ~ o'.
~ b lM ri v
a ~ ~ ~ a~ b ~ I N o
a 1, ~ ~ 4~ ~ Q i do ~ h a t y b ..t
~ \ g i ~ ~ bap
t t ~ a e- V'9o 9 w o~ ;:a
l I' ono t ~ ~
~ 4"li. 51 v 4 ti ro I
W, ~ ~ l CC3 ~
~ ~ o 1 ~
N N h
i
b c ~u I '
a~
U
rn 'C7
C ' Ri ~
P ' n#
~ maw ' oQo
I .~'i If this notice appaars.clem•er :han the AUG 2 41998 ddocument, the document is of ma~•ginnl guaiih. '1 MICROFILMED
a - L •
~ INCH. ~ MADE IN IX -sm-aa-.-. ~ . i r;•_= r r-•--- 4 s n:.,~ It u~°~ tc rys.;:~tt r•°`,ia n.;',r _ - _ - ~s _ u;
IIuIIIIIIIIII~IIIIHI(1111dt1(1111f1~lf111f101111111( IIIll4([~II((IfI11~11IllIII(~1(IIIIIIf~IfIO((IWII111II(III1lflllilllIll(iuVllllllfl~lUUlUjUIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIl1Ii1IIIllAIYllli1 ~ m m (n~i(iiluiuuuGwnQ i~((il
1 _ ~ - ~
b ~
~ I
b
CCl
i..4
U!
C~
~r
If this notice appaarsklem•er :hxn 4he
'.document, the document is of marginal quality. 1
1~~' ~L~
fNCN NADE tN CH x;ec^:,~ss._ _-a:..:
dmmmhm ud~~u~ii~~riilili~~iiti►if►ti~i~i~~~~fi►1►~m~hu~►~if
N
R>
o~
U N
~ O
y
w~.
• C
v v
N
t. ~
U ~
~ D •N
U
v
• ~ o
o c
•c •o
a~.r U
Y.
~ y
A
U m
AUG 2 41998
MICROFILMED
N
O
4
I ,Y,
o
~
a
i
.
0
:U
~
~ ~I
:
m-
'
~
,DC
~ i-i
v
bQ
c
a
j
.
-
~ ~
~
.
a
~
a
i
' q
ni
. ;
> A ,
.
I ~
,
~
U
.
o..
•
~
.x
~
I
~
~
G '
.
~ ~
t
•
~
i
j
3
,per Tigard Triangle
• Design Standards per Task Force meeting on 3.'3197
March 4. 1997
3. Weather protection - Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings
canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather
protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public
sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building
frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway.
Awnings and canopies shall not be back lit.
4. Building Materials - Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal,
plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior
finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain
concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than
2 feet.
5. Roofs and roof lines - Except in the case of a building entrance feature,
roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the
building and should respect the building's structural system and
architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted.
6. Roof-mounted equipment - All roof-mounted equipment must be screened
from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other
communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that
exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels
are exempt from this standard.
D. Signs. In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.114 of the Development
Code the following standards shall be met:
1. 7onina district reculations - Residential only developments within the C-G
and MUE zones shall meet the sign requirements for the R-25 zone
(18.1 14.130 B); non-residential developments within the C-G zone shall
meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones (18.114.130 C); and
non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign
requirements of the C-P zone (18.114.130 D).
i
i
i~
1
I
i
Mixed Use Employment District 4
Spencer & Kupper
Lloyd D. Lindley, ASLA
Cogan Ovens Cogan
Design Standards
Tigard Triangle March 4. 1'
1 Design Standards per Task Force meeting on 313197
2. Sign area limits - The maximum sign area limits found in 18.114.130 shat
not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the
Tigard Triangle.
1
D
E.
U
97
1
3. Height limits - The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs
shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roof line of the wall
on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within
the Tigard Triangle.
4. Sign location - Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be
permitted within required L-I landscape areas.
Entry Portals. Entry portals shall be required at the primary access points into
the Tigard Triangle. f
1. Location - Entry portals shall be located at the intersections of 99W and
Dartmouth; 99W and 72od; I-5 and Dartmouth; Hwy. 217 and 72'; and at
the Hwy 217 Overcrossing and Dartmouth.
2. Design - The overall design of entry portals shall relate in scale and detail
to both the automobile and the pedestrian. A triangle motif shall be
incorporated into the design of entry portals.
F. Landscaping and Screening. Two levels of landscaping and screening standard
are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or
screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are define in
other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements.
Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met.
1. L-1 Low Screen - For general landscaping of landscaped and screened
areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting
standards of Chapter 18.100 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. The
L-I standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the
setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or
minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 3 '/z inch caliper, at a maximum of
28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provided a 3 foot
high screen and a 90% opacity within one year. Groundcover plants must
Mired Use Employment District 5
Spencer & Kupper
Lloyd D. Lindley, ASLA
Cogan Chvens Cogan
s
i
f
I
i
I
i
i
i
s~
Tigard Triangle Mauch 4. 1997
Design Standards per Task Force meeting on 313197
My cover the remainder of landscape area within two years. Any tree
planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation
credit.
2. L-2 General .andscapine - For general landscaping of landscaped and
screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets,
planting standards of Chapter 18.100 Landscaping and Screening, shall
apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 2 inch caliper, at a
maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to
achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Any
tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation
credit.
j
I
G. Street and Accessway Standards. The following tables and diagrams show .
street and pedestrian accessway standards for the Tigard Triangle. Landscape and
street design details are also included in this section.
0
Mixed Use Employment District
Spcnccr& Kupper
Lloyd D. Lindley. ASLA
Cogan Cmcns Cogan
Street
Policy Classification
Street Function
Land Use/
Design Prioritv
Right-of-Way
72nd Street
Major Arterial
Provide access
Mixed Use
92 feet
Transit Access Street
to Triangle
Employment
Hwy 99 to Hwy
Pedestrian-Transit Street
destinations
217
Bikeway
Limited access to oft
66 feet
Distribute traffic
street Puking
curb-to-curb
within the
Triangle
Enhanced Pedestrian
environment
Provide
Boulevard design with
connections
two-way traffic
between districts
Distribute traffic
Transit-oriented street
from regional
features
arterials and
Bike lanes
major collectors
to local service
Continuity of
streets
alignment and design
throughout Triangle
Local transit
service
Bicvcle mobilitv
{ Tigard Triangle
Design Standards per Task Force meeting on 3/3/97
;
i
J
J
;
9
a
7
Street
Policy Classification
Street Function
Land Use/
Section
Design Priority
Dartmouth
Major Arterial
Provide access
Mixed Use
70 feet
Transit Access Street
to Triangle
Employment with
Hwy 99 to 691
Pedestrian-Transit Street
destinations
Neighborhood and
44 feet
Ave.
Bikeway
Regional retail
curb-to-curb
Distribute traffic
within Triangle
Limited access to off-
street parking
Provide
connections
Enhanced pedestrian
between districts
rnvirotimrnt
Distribute traffic
from regional
arterials and
major collectors
to local service
streets
Local transit
service
Bicycle mobilitv
68' Ave.
Minor Arterial
Provide access to
Mired Use
70 feet
Pedestrian-Transit Street
local services
Employment
Atlanta to
46 feet
Hampton
Distribute local
Enhanced pedestrian
curb-to-curb
traffic
environment
Bicycle lanes
Bicycle access
Mixed Use Employment District
Spencer & Kupper
Lloyd D. Lindley, ASLA
Cogan Otrens Cogan
8 Design Standards
n
0
1
Tigard Triangle
Nlarcl.4, 1997
Design Standards per Task Force meeting on 313197
Street
Policy Classification
Street Function
Land Use/
Right-of-Way
Design Priority
217 Over-
Mirror Arterial
Provide access to
Mired Use
70 feet
Crossing
Transit Access Street
Triangle
i
Employment
Pedestrian-Transit Street
ons
destinat
46 feet
West of
Enhanced pedestrian
orb to curtr
Dartmouth)
Distribute traffic
environment
within the
Triangle
Transit-oriented street
features
Bicycle lanes
J
Bicycle access
-
Provide
connections
'
between districts
Distribute trntlic
from arterials and
collector streets to
local service
streets
Local transit
service
1.
Tigard Triangle
Design Standards per Task Force meeting on 313197
r
9
9
y
March 4, 1997
Street
Policy Classification
Street Function
Land Use/
Section
Design Priority
Hampton
Minor Arterial
Provide access to
Mixed Use
70 feet
St.
Transit Access Street
Triangle
Employment
Pedestrian-Transit Street
destinations
68°to 72nd
Enhanced pedestrian
46 feet
curb-to-curb
Distribute traffic
environment
within the
Triangle
Transit-oriented street
features
Bicycle lanes
Bicycle access
Provide
connections
between districts
Distribute traffic
from arterials and
collector sleets to
local service
streets
Local transit
service
Baekage
Local Collector
Provide access to
Mixed Use
60 feet
Road
local services
Commercial and
Retail along 99W
36 feet
Distribute local
traffic
Access to oiT-street
curb-to-curb
parking
Parking access
street
Enhanced pedestrian
environment
ri
9
a
a
r
i
i~
Tigard Triangle March 4, 1997
Design Standards per Task Force meeting on 3/3197
Street
Policy Classification
Strect Function
Land Usc/
Right-0f--Way
Design Priority
East-West
Local Service Street
Provide access to
Mined Use
60 feet
Streets
local services
Commercial and
Retail along 99W
34 feet
Distribute local
curb-to-curb
traffic
Access to off-street
parking
Parking access
street
Enhanced pedestrian
environment
North-South
Local Service Street
Provide access to
Mixed Use
60 feat
Streets
local services
Commercial and
Retail along 99W
34 feet
Distribute local
curb-to-curb
traffic
Access to of--street
parking
Parking access
street
Enhanced pedestrian
environment
f
Tigard Triangle Irlarch 4, 1997
Design Standards per Task Force meeting on 313197
.
Access Ways
CLASS I ACCESS WAY
Function: Auto and parking (at least on one side)
Access to parking (optional)
Bicycles (in roadway)
Pedestrian improvements
• Right-of--way: 52' - 60'
• Own. crswp: Public dedication
t
i
Application: East-west streets to parking access
CLASS II
• Function: Pedestrian and Bicycle
Right-of-way: 40'•
• Ownership: Public or Private with a Public Access Easement
• Applications: East-west access ways
Fire Access'
Critical pedestrian access routes.
C
'If emergency vehicle access is provided by alternative locations, a
i
lessor dimension to a minimum of 30 feet in width may be allowed
4
with approval of City Engineer.
i
I
Mixed Use Employment District 12 Design Standards
Spencer & Kupper
C
i
Llovd D. Lindley, ASLA
Cogan Owens Cogan
t
1
_..__-_-___r.
Applications: Fast-west and north-south accessways
Connections to meet accessibility standards
Pedestrian
10' - 25' case by case
Private
Design Standards j
-1
,o
OVERSIZED DOCUMENTS
f
MEETING DATE: 0311 I)q -7
~ AGENDA
SEE 35MM ROLL FILM
i:\records\microflm\targets\osdocccm.doc
Mar-10-97 07:39A Paul Simmons 50:3
MAR-O?-1997 15*.49 CFR1STENSEN ENG/UiKING
HRISTENSEN (p
NGINEERING
March 7, 1997
Ms. Nadine Smith
City of Tigard Community Development Department
13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
RE' TIGARD TRIANGLE STREET PLAN DESIGN STANDARDS
Dedicated Right of Way for Access Ways and Local Strewts
i
Dear Nadine:
Pursuant to our meeting on March 3, 1997 with the Tigard Triang
understanding that it was agreed that Access Ways shall be dedicated to n
curb including parking on both sides of the street, or 27 feet curb-to-curb
street. Local Streets shall be dedicated to no more than 38 feet curb-to-e
sides of the street, or 28 feet curb-to-curb with parking on one side of the
Dartmouth Street Section contained in the Design Standards arc supposed
in the Triangle Sketch Book on page 16 for 72nd Avenue which is a 92 fo
Your attention to these revisions prior to the March 11, 1997 City
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Edward K. Chris
l
President
Gordon S. Martin
Task Force Mein
Kathy Godfrey
3
a M
eern
/
^
ul Simmons
Task Force Mem
- ~j
715oS.W. Hampton Street Suite 226 Port1and.0rr&oe97223 P6one(%3)
9y
d
-588-5752 P.01
P.02
suhm~tf-e~
Urdc;r t"Y10.,ti7C„~,"
3/Il~ci~
CLARIECATION I
le Task Force, it is our
o more than 34 feet curb-to-
with parking on one side of the
urb including parking on both
street. Additionally, the
to be the same as those shown
of Right-of-Way dedication.
Council meeting would be
tcnsen, P.E.
bet, in attendance on 3-3-97 1
J
t
qE
r4.,r*4EERJN4C3
March 7, 1997
1
Ms. Nadine Smith
City of Tigard Community Development Department
13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
11
RE: TIGARD TRIANGLE STREET PLAN DESIGN STANDARDS CLARIFICATION
?
Dedicated Right of Way for Access Ways and Local Streets
[
Dear Nadine:
Pursuant to our meeting on March 3, 1997 with the Tigard Triangle Task Force, it is our
understanding that it was agreed that Access Ways shall be dedicated to no more than 34 feet curb-to-
curb including parking on both sides of the street, or 27 feet curb-to-curb with parking on one side of the
street. Local Streets shall be dedicated to no more than 38 feet curb-to-curb including parking on both
j
sides of the street, or 28 feet curb-to-curb with parking on one side of the street. Additionally, the
Dartmouth Street Section contained in the Design Standards are supposed to be the same as those shown
in the Trian
le Sketch Book on
a
e 16 fo
72
d A
hi
h i
92 f
Ri
h
f
W
g
p
g
r
n
venue w
c
s a
oot
g
t-o
-
ay dedication.
Your attention to these revisions prior to the March 11, 1997 City Council meeting would be
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Edward K. Christensen, P.E.
President
Gordon S. Martin
Task Force Member, in attendance on 3-3-97
Kathy Godfrey
Task Force Member, in attendance on 3-3-97
i
-
j
Paul Simmons
E
j
Task Force Member, in attendance on 3-3-97
7150 S.JV. llampton Street Suite 226 Portland, Oregon 97223 Phone (503) 598-1866 Fax(503)598-1868
DATE: March 11, 1997
SUBJECT: Street Connectivity Design Standards for the Tigard Triangle
After carefi:l evaluation of the Street Connectivity Design Standards for the Tigard
Triangle, the Task Force members and interested property owners recognize the need to
implement design standards that are clear and concise which will assure proper
implementation. "Performance Option 2" of the Street Connectivity Design Standards
requires clarifying to confirm its proper execution. Performance Option 2 reads:
a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than ei
ht street
g
intersections per mile.
b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a
collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line
distance.
C. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to
a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the
straight-line distance.
j
The following Definition and Clarification Statement is required to properly implement
"
Performance Option 2":
.
Definition.
j
The point of "Local Origin" is the curb-cut to a parcel at its property line.
Clarification
Statement
If the subject parcel directly abuts a Collector or Greater Facility, then the
distance from the subject parcel's property line to a Collector or Greater
Facility is zero (0)feet. Therefore, all roads constructed on the subject parcel
are private commercial drivetivays with Public Access F,asements.
i
1
r
;a
Triangle Design Standards
March 11, 1997
t
'
Without this Clarification Statement "Performance Option 2" could be interpreted to
require the dedication of right-of-way for a Local Street or Access Way from a Collector
Street all the way to the front door of every building. It is not the intent of the Task Force
members or interested Property Owners to allow publicly dedicated streets to encroach
within the boundaries of a planned development which is located on one parcel of land.
If this situation should occur, it will effectively eliminate large parcels of commercial
land which is a scarce commodity. Furthermore, it will cause enormous damage to the
j
remaining parcels by promoting: security problems, street and landscape maintenance
]
problems, site alteration and remodeling problems, site engineering and planning
problems, tenant leasing problems, and irreparable economic hardship.
Name Representing - ~ntt nTi. e a ev
Name Representing
1
4
'
1
l nwV
i
C PISTE, M;i ENG,'ujF:114G
® Triangle. llevign 5tondtuds
Mach 11, 1997
i
I
i
Without Chic Clarifrcalion Statoment "Pnrfonnanoe Option 3" could be interpreted to
mequire the dedierdion of dght•of--way for a local Strcet or Access Way frout a Collector
Street all the way to tho from doer of OVery bulld'uig. It i o not tlx: intcot of tbu Tarok Pcncc
niornberq or inter"ted Property Owners to allow publicly dedicated altccta to encroach
within the boundaries: of u plwtned development which is located on one parcel of land.
Ifthi. situation should occur, it will effectively eliminate large parccls ofcomntcrcial
land wltich is a scarce eotnrnodity. Furthermore, it will cause enonnous damuge tv the f
remaining parcels by pmonn,ling: security problems. Strcet and landscape mainteitanct f
problems, site alterntion and remodeling problems, site engineering and planning h
pmobJema, tenrutl leasing problems. mid in-cparable economic hardship. i,
Name TORNEY RepmSenting SSN, I
Name Representing
i
'i
m
i
z
9
1J
J~
1
l
t
{
J
a
7
1
3
3
a
I:
fl
•"•+l 177! 1c:44P!j F'oi - -
i TO: Mu)-or Jim Nicoli and Tigard ('Ity C•ovucll
rRU"A. Triangle Toth 1 arcc Members and ]nterested property O%vner.
DA'rR: March 11, 1997
- I
SUBJ13C'1 ; Sticet Conwectivity llcsign Standnrda for the Tigard Triuigle
Aftcr tau ilul eValunlion of the Strcet Connectivity Design Standards for the Tignrd
Triangle, the Teask 1'vrce tncnibei s and interested property owners racognive the need to
implement design standurds that are clear and coroisc which will assure proper
implementation. "Performance Option 2" of the Street C'omlectivity Design Standards
requires clarifying to confirm its proper execution. Performance Option 2 reads:
s « Local street spacing shall occur at inlervaly ot'nu leas than eight altroet
intersections per mile.
b. The shortest veltiOv trip over public streets from a local origin to a
collector or gn;ater facility Is no more than twice the straight-line
1 disaanec.
C. Thc shortest pedestrian hip on public right-of-way from a local origin to
Il a collector or grentel• facility is nu more than one and one-halt the
strsight•lire distance.
T'hr following Dcfinidou and Clarircntion Statement is required to properly implement
" Pcrrorninrtce Option 2"•
Us'flu tittui
! The point of "local Origin " is she curb-cut to a purrel at its properly litre.
i
~'J.dlj~chtinn Stat tts nr
If the subject pure el directly aburs a Collector or G;rrater Facility. then the
distance,i•am the subject pap coal's property line to It Colleoror or Greater
Fac1111~~ is zero (Ql finds. Thu fore, all ramie raartriieted an the a4lect parcel
arc private r otrunvrcial dritleivayt udrh Puhile .tcx•ess Eavopnent.r
:
M
G
i
503 620 INN ria~ . t t 1497 4' P1 t Fr,2
WiUtout this Clarification Stutemcni "Performance Option 2" could be interpreted to
1 rrtluiro the dedicution of right-of-way for a Lucul Yircct or Acecss Way from u Collector
sircet ull 1110 wily to the Iiurit door of every building. it it, not the intent of the Task Force
3 members ar interested Property Ownero to uilow publicly dodicated streou to wwioarh
C within the boundaries of a planned development which Is located on one paroal of land.
i .
If this siatattuu should uouur,lt will effectively eliminate large parcels of commercial
land which is a scarce conlnlodlty. Furthermore, it will cause cnonnous damage to the
n maiming parcels by prwnoting stluirily problems, street and landscApe maintenance
i Problems, site alicrntiun and remodeling problems, site engineering find planning
Problems, tenan! leasing prablums, and in•oparabla CcOnOMic hands hip.
i i' , 7 7 7
1 Not Representing _ G^
3 Name Representing
/
rrpm HBP. :nCCrpordt2U FHCNE No. 503 620 le42 tor. 11 1997
2:001'rt F02
i
`
7
MEMORANDUM
i
TO: Mayor Jim Nicoli and Tigard City Council
i
FROM. Triangle Task Force Members and Interocted Property Owners
{
DA'1'F: March 11, 1997
SUBJECT: Street Connectivity Design Standards for the Tigard Triangle
C
Aflcr cajvFul evaluation of the Street Connectivity Design Standards for the Tigard
Tri
l
h
ang
e, t
n Tusk Force mernbers and interested property ownorn recogniva the need to
impkanczrt dcyign standards that aro clear and concise which will assure proper
implementution. "Pcrfonnance Option 2" of the Stroot Connectivity Denitpi Standards
requires clarifying to "infirm its proper execution. Performance Option 2 rands:
` .
a. Local utmet spacing ahall occur at intervals of nn lecc than eight street
intersections per mile.
1
b. The shortest vehicle trip over public itrocts from a local origin to tt
wll"tor or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line
distance.
e. 77re shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local urigin to
a collector or LtreMOr facility is no more than one and one-half the
straight lieudit:lturcc.
Thu following Definition and ClarltIcation SlutenicuL is required to properly implement
1
"PL:rAmmuive Option 2";
jJQfinitien:
I
The point of 'Local Origin ° Is the curb-cut to u parcel at its property line.
!
.
I{
I
l~l rlfi"atiOn ~1~'t4'i?~4n1:
`
Y then subject puree! directly abuts a Collector or Grruter 1-ucillq; tlcarr the
disicnace froin the. subjecl parcel's propero, line to a C cillrewr nr C,reatrr
h'acilltY is zero (O) feet. 7hcrcfore, all roads constructed an the subject parcel
i
I
are private commercial driveways with Publicdec•ess Easvinmirs.
i.
From AHQ Incorporated PHONE No. 52~ 6223 1842
Triangle Design Standards
gg~ March 11, 1997
a
a
p Without this Clarificatinn Statement "Perfonuance Option 2" could be interpreted to
j requlru the dedicatlon of rtglu-of--Way for a Local Street or Aece.. Way froth " Collector
i Street all the way to the fl'ont door of ovary building. It is not the intent of the Taal: Force. -
members or hit_notted Property Owners to allow publioly dedicated streets to encroach
within the botmdarita u!' a planned development which is located on one parcel of land. -
I If thn: ultuallan sl ould occur. it will effectively eliminate large parcels of commercial
land which is u scarce cantmodity. Furthermore, it will cause enormous damage to the
1 remaining parwls by jyttrruot1nr i accurity probloma, no-oat and lantlaanpa maintenance
problems, site nitcrxtiuia and remodeling problems, site engineering and planning
problems, tenant leasing rroblcrns, and Irraparable economic hardship
Namt• Representing ~?I ~~i .~1/•."
NatnA _ Representing
(I
~ i
1
1
i~
i
j
i
I _
1 ,
1
r
MFF-~ -~=57 1_• CHNiSTENSEN ENG/U!r.itlG
Ms. Nadine Smith f
City of Tigard Community Development Department `
13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: TIGARD TRIANGLE STREET PLAN DESIGN STANDARDS CLARIFICATION f
Dedicated Right of Way for Access Ways and Local Streets
i
Dear Nadine:
Pursuant to our meeting on March 3, 1997 with the Tigard Triangle Task Force, it is our
understanding that it was agreed that Access Ways shall be dedicated to no more than 34 feet curb-to-
curb including parking on both aides of the street, or 27 feet curb-to-curb with parking on one side of the
street. Local Streets shall be dedicated to no more than 38 feet curb-to-curb including parldng on both
sides of the street, or 28 feet curb-to-curb with parking on one side of the street. Additionally, the
Dartmouth Street Section contained in the Design Standards are supposed to be the ,ame as those shoHa
in the Triangle Sketch Book or page 16 for 72nd Avenue which is a 92 foot Right-of-Way dedication.
Your attention to these revisiens prior to the March 11, 1997 City Council meeting would be
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely, J(~
Edward K. Christensen, P.E.
President
Gordon S. Martin }
Task Force Member, in art: ndance or. 3-3-97
Kathy Godfrey
Task Force Member, in attendance on 3-33.97
Paul Simmons
Task Force vlember, in .t:endancc on 3-3-97
I~ .
f
7150 S.W. Flampron Street S06 226 Portland, of -Znn 97223 Phone (503) 598-1866 Feu (503) 59S-1868 i
PW
.~f
_a
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Jim Nicoli and Tigard City Council
FROM: Triangle Task Fvrvo hlcmbera and Intorostcd Property Owners
DATE: March 11, 1997
SUBJECT; Strcct Conncctivity Design Standards for the Tigard Triangle
After carcM evuluation of the Street Connectivity Design Standards for the Tigard
Triangle, the Task force members and interestod property owners recognize the need to
implement design standards that are clear and concise which will assure proper
implementation. "Performance Option 2" of the Street Connectivity Design Standards
requires clarifying to confirm its proper execution. Performance Option 2 reads:
a. Lowt street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street
intwsectlons pcr mile.
h. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local ori& to a
collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line
distance.
C. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to
a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the
straight-line distance.
The following Definition and Clarification Statement is required to properly implement
"Performance Option 2":
Definition-
The point of "Local Orion " is the curb-cui to a parcel at its property line.
If the subject parcel directly abuts a Collector or Greater Facility. then the
distance from the subject parcel 's property line to a Collector or Greater
Facility is zero (0) feet. 7Rerefore, all roads constructed on the subject parcel
are private commercial driveways with Public Access Fascments.
~
Ma1-1.1-97 02:35P Farmers Ins Port RO
From : APR Incor?orated
PHONE 503 684-9151 p 03
No. : 503 520 1842 Mar. 11 1997 3:31PM P03
i
f Triangle nenign Standards
March 11, 1997
a
Without this Clarification Statement "Performance Option 2" could be interpreted to
rcduue the dedication of right-of-way for a Local Street or Access Way from a Collector
Street all the way to the font dour of every building. It is not the intent of the Tank Force
members or intor"ted property Owncra to allow publicly dedicated &tracts to encroach
within the boundaries of a planned development which is located on one parcel of land.
I If this situation should occur, it will offoctively eliminate Iarga parc*Is of commercial
j laud which is a.rcarce commodity. Furthermore, it will cause enormous damage to the
j remaining parcels by promoting: security problems, street and landscape maintenance
problems, site alteration and mmodchng problems, site engineering and planning
problems, tenant leasing problems, and irnsparablc economic hardship.
Name
I 5~ Representing
Name
Representing
a
l r. bc,~_l e b t.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Jim Nicoli and Tigard City Council
FROM: Triangle Task Force Members and Interested Property Owners
DATE: March 11, 1997
SUBJECT: Street Connectivity Design Standards for the Tigard Triangle
After careful evaluation of the Street Connectivity Design Standards for the Tigard
Triangle, the Task Force members and interested property owners recognize the need to
1
implement design standards that are clear and concise which will assure proper
implementation. "Performance Option 2" of the Street Connectivity Design Standards
requires clarifying to confirm its proper execution. Performance Option 2 reads:
F
a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street
intersections per mile.
b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a
collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line
distance.
C. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to
a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the
straight-line distance.
The following Definition and Clarification Statement is required to properly implement
"
Performance Option 2":
Definition:
a
The point of "Local Origin " is the curb-cut to a parcel at its properry line.
Clan ication Statem
1
ent:
If the subject parcel directly abuts a Collector or Greater Facility, then the
'
distance from the subject parcel's properry line to a Collector or Greater
Facility is zero (0) feet. Therefore, all roads constructed on the subject parcel
1L,J
are private commercial driveways with Public Access Easements.
I
,
Without this Clarification Statement "Performance Option 2" could be interpreted to
require the dedication of right-of-way for a Local Street or Access Way from a Collector
Street all the way to the front door of every building. It is not the intent of the Task Force
members or interested Property Owners to allow publicly dedicated streets to encroach
within the boundaries of a planned development which is located on one pa*ceI of land.
If this situation should occur, it will effectively eliminate large parcels of commercial
land which is a scarce commodity. Furthermore, it will cause enormous damage to the
remaining parcels by promoting: security problems, street and landscape maintenance
problems, site alteration and remodeling problems, site engineering and planning
problems, tenant leasing problems, and irreparable economic hardship.
I
Representing
Representing
ATH MAN 503 797 1911 Mar 11.97 11:46 No.007 P.02
~JJ
'~7 {fe •of •rrl->r 6-MO .r-r rut I •O~Ja♦>u. oaloa• trJli t/Jf ~ a_-/
r<a ffl ,)r rl.• I.t fJr r) 11)r 1
t
CA-
METRO C~1L1 /1G ,
March 11, 1997
r
The Honorable Jim Nicoli
Mayor of the City of Tigard
13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
`f
Dear Mayor Nicoli: t
~r
Re: Deslgn Standards for the Tigard Tdangla - /Addendum to ZOA 9&0005j
Your staff's work and that of the Triangle Task Force is a good effort at balancing the -
complex issues associated with creating connections and r vI'di`
alternatives modes of
transportation. P o ng for
AiP)
The proposed street connectivity standards are consistent with those outlined in Title 6 of the
adopted Functional Plan. The detail sheets on the proposed street sections of the Tigard Triangle
Street Plan provide options which offer flexibility for the property owner while meeting the City's
and Metro's goal of providing facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Through this process, I believe that we have established a good working relationship and I look
forward to working with you on the 217 Corridor Analysis and the Regional Center Plan for
Washington Square.
Sincerely,
Mike Burton
Executive Officer
MB/MW/srb
1AGM\MW\TIGC0M -1.DOC
cc: Metro Council
~qq
8 ~
9
soo xon*xr<s* cnnr.o avrxur roars<x o, aaecox vr„i >„c
o ,9r, o a. so
METRO
March 11, 1997
The Honorable Jim Nicoli
Mayor of the City of Tigard
13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Mayor Nicoli:
Re: Design Standards for the Tigard Triangle - (Addendum to ZOA 96-0005)
~u
MAR 12
oc ,
ICJ!
_„`7 ~."Lj Lir6
Your staff's work and that of the Triangle Task Force is a good effort at balancing the
complex issues associated with creating connections and providing for alternatives modes of
transportation.
The proposed street connectivity standards are consistent with those outlined in Title 6 of the
adopted Functional Plan. The detail sheets on the proposed street sections of the Tigard Triangle
l Street Plan provide options which offer flexibility for the property owner while meeting the City's
a and Metro's goal of providing facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists.
i
9 Through this process, I believe that we have established a good working relationship and I look
forward to working with you on the 217 Corridor Analysis and the Regional Center Plan for
Washington Square.
s
Sincerely,
a l
Mike Burton
Executive Officer
3 MB/MW/srb
I:\GM\MW\TIGC0M-1.D0C
cc: Metro Council
RI, 1, IN r,n„
f
j M
~sy AGENDA ITEM # - , l
FOR AGENDA OF March 11. 1997
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE 1997 Council Goals
PREPARED BY: W. A. Monahan DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK l/ Y
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Council met with the City Manager on February 18 to establish Council Goals for the coming year. A list of
goals has been established. An initial attempt has been made to define the goals and assign responsibility. €
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
j Staff recommends that Council review the draft goals and give input where the draft goals need refinement,
detail or change to conform to the Council's direction.
INFORMATIONSUMMARY
package of draft goals for 1997 and beyond. Some require further detail while others require City department
analysis before prioritization and scheduling can occur. Before proceeding, staff needs Council direction to
instruct whether the initial draft is a reflection of Council's intent.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Create an alternative set of goals.
C -
i FISCAL NOTES ! .
Financial impacts of goals will be determined as staff prepares workplans to complete some of the more I
complex goals. Some goals may take up to two years to complete, thus the cost may be spread over two or
more budgets. k
II
i i`1dm\cathy\coumil\goalssum.doc .
I
I
I
I
1
I
1997 Council Goals
i
Teen Center
Continue the effort identified in the 1996 Council Goals, to participate in Youth Center
Study.
1
Elements of City Involvement:
• City representation at meetings of the Youth Committee (Chief Goodpaster
z
has acted as the City's representatives).
• Work with the Committee to move the Committee's ideas toward a
+
j
proposal which can be presented to the public for funding (either by
J
Ill
private contributions, a funding measure put before the voters, school
,
€
district and/or City funding, or a combination).
• Provide assistance from the Community Development Department in the
identification of possible locations in Tigard for the center (temporary
and/or permanent siting).
City Departments Assigned:
~
• Police
i
t
• Community Development
,a
• Administration
L
ight_13ail
Continue to support the concept of passenger rail service planning through
Tigard.
j
During 1996 a consultant study was initiated by Washington County and
several cities, including Tigard. During 1997 the initial steps will be
undertaken to determine feasibility possible station sites, funding options,
timing, etc.
1
1
i
Elements of City Involvement:
Provision of information to the consultant study (Community Development
and Engineering)
Participation in the committee overseeing the study (Mayor Nicoli has
served in this capacity for the past year).
Report to Council on the status of the study effort, identify obstacles and
solutions (staff and Mayor).
City Departments Assigned:
• Community Development
Report to the public, through the media and Cityscape, the accomplishments of
City staff and departments. The objectives are to recognize staff for their efforts
and report the positive workings of the City. Consider ways to recognize
outstanding efforts of City staff that do not fit into the Employee of the Month
program.
Elements of City Involvement:
Present Employee of the Month (EOM) reports in the Cityscape
Issue press releases to media on the accomplishments of EOM's and other
staff members and employee teams.
Consider a program for Council to recognize outstanding employee
contributions on an annual basis.
City Departments Assigned:
® • City Administration
W
Continue to address the space needs of the City, including needs resulting from the
addition of staffing to handle Washington County Urban Services.
Elements of City Involvement:
• Prepare and propose space allocations to incorporate staff needed to handle
increased workload brought on by assuming responsibilities in
unincorporated Washington County.
• Prepare to utilize the building at the corner of Ash Avenue and Burnham,
once the Interfaith Outreach Services vacate the building to relocate to the
RITE Center.
• Evaluate opportunities, needs, and funding options to address the long-
term space needs of:
- Police
- Library
- City Services
• Make optimum use of City buildings, but place emphasis on customer
service and employee morale. Balance these concerns with available and
potential funding sources.
• Acquire complete interest in the Water Building.
Evaluate the opportunity to acquire 100% ownership of the former Tigard
Water District Building from the Tigard Water District, City of Durham,
and City of King City. Consider payment options that meet the needs of
the sellers. Present the proposal to the owners in 1997, seeking formal
action to accept or reject the City's proposal.
Prepare proposals, consider City funding options, consider options for use
of the building for City purposes, and develop funding mechanisms, if
needed.
City Departments Assigned:
• City Administration (with assistance of all others)
• Finance
Monthly Reporting of Pending Development Locations:
Provide information to Council, in a timely manner, which identifies for Council pending
development applications shortly after applications are filed. City Administration will
1 batch the information summaries and distribute them to Council in the weekly newsletter.
This will be a regular activity.
City Departments Assigned:
3
• Community Development
• City Administration
Review Ordinances and Resolutions
i
Undertake a review of existing City Ordinances and Resolutions for the purpose of
streamlining the City Code to eliminate those that are outdated. Bring forth agenda topics
to accomplish this purpose:
City Departments Assigned:
[ • City Administration
Comprehensive Public Facility Plans
Over the period through December, 1998, develop comprehensive public facility plans in
the following areas:
• Streets
• Sewer system trunk lines
• Sidewalks i
Engineering staff will assemble information and plans that exist today. The plans will be
evaluated and a work plan developed which identifies studies and plans needed to develop j
comprehensive plans to serve the existing City and areas likely to be annexed to the City
(the urban growth boundary). Tasks will be developed for both City staff and
consultants. The lead review committee of the staff efforts will be the Planning
Commission. Staff lead will be the City Engineer.
Once the plans are prepared, funding options will be identified. Proposals for individual
or joint bond proposals will be developed for consideration by the City Council. -
It is recognized that each of the three facility plans will involve an extensive allocation of
staff resources and budget. Therefore, an initial step of the process will be prioritization
1 of the three study areas. A two-year work plan will be developed to schedule work in the
three areas.
During the planning process, street classifications will be reviewed to determine if change
in specific street designations is needed. Coordination will be necessary throughout plan
deve!o,-MeRt wind Washington County, adjacent cities, Unified Sewerage Agency,
ODOT, etc. Changes in Development Standards may be required, resulting in
modifications to Engineering standards and the Development Code. Efforts must be
made to work within the work programs and resources of Engineering, Community
Development, and Public Works staff who participate in the development of these plans.
A minimum sidewalk connection plan will be part of the study. Emphasis will be placed ( 1
® ) on connecting neighborhoods to school sites. 1
City Departments Assigned:
• Engineering
• Community Development
• Public Works
• Finance
Schedule annual updates from City task forces and committees. The updates shall either
be in a meeting format or written report. Each task force or committee should have an
annual meeting with Council or meet at a particularly important time (dictated by the task
force's schedule of task completion).
Committees such as the Budget Committee, Planning Commission, and Library Board
will meet with Council for a Work Session (or combined with training) at a pre-scheduled I
time. For instance, the Planning Commission could meet with Council in a Work
Session format each April. Meetings with task forces would occur at an appropriate time
consistent with the work program of the task force, such as a point when the task force
requires Council direction or upon completion of the effort.
5
~
City Departments Assigned:
• City Administration (to schedule)
• Those departments which are assigned to staff committees or
task forces.
~ I
Visioning
J,
Continue support of the visioning program, maintaining the established schedule. The
program, initiated by Council goal in 1996, is on schedule for completion in 1997. Staff
and Council resources have been assigned to the program, citizen involvement is
underway, and the task force is moving ahead with its programs.
Council will receive regular updates on the task force's efforts. II
City Departments Assigned:
• City Administration (to coordinate)
• All (to support the task force's efforts and provide information as needed).
99W Improvements I`
The 99W Task Force has been in existence for a few years. Council wants to promote
completion of the planning process and support funding of improvements identified along
99W, such as the Hall/99W project.
I
A meeting of Council and the task force must be scheduled so that the task force may
report on its activities and seek guidance for either continuation of effort or completion of
the effort.
City Departments Assigned:
• Community Development
i
• Engineering j
1 • City Administration
t Police Funding- Specialty Programs
Police specialty programs (Youth Officer, GREAT, DARE, Washington Square, SRO's,
etc.) must be evaluated in light of general fund reductions brought on by passage of
Measure 47. As Legislature direction is given on how much funding will be available
s locally from property taxes, decisions on allocation of general fund revenues to Police
will be necessary. Continuation of specialty programs must be evaluated in light of
overall department needs.
{ Discussion with Police Administration will take place throughout the budget cycle in
1997. Affected service recipients (School District, Washington Square, etc.) will be
advised of the funding issues and given an opportunity for input (and contribution of
alternative funding) throughout the process. Funding alternatives such as future serial
levies shall also be evaluated.
City Departments Assigned:
i
• Police
i
j • City Administration
Long-Tenn Financing Options
Measure 47 has created uncertainty of funding for the Library through both general fund
resources and the WCCLS levy. Library facilities are at capacity. Plans for future
J expansion of the Library either cooperatively with other WCCLS members or through a
i City bond will be evaluated. Siting of either an expanded Library on the present site,
development of a new, larger Library, or satellite facilities, will be considered.
Financing options in light of present and predicted revenue sources and options will be
the focus of the goal.
i
I
i
3
7
City Departments Assigned:
• Library
• Finance
® Planning Studies - Washington Square/Scholls/Walnut Island
Three areas of the community have been identified as requiring planning to determine
future needs (land use, public facilities) and the role the City will play. Each area is
unique and is experiencing development pressures. Distinct studies are needed, not all
can be completed at the same time due to staff and financial limitations.
Initially Council and staff will develop a work plan and prioritization of the three studies.
At this time the most obvious needs of the areas are:
• Washington Square/Metzger - a decision of the extent of commercial
zoning between Hall and Greenburg Road is needed. Land use,
transportation needs, public facilities are all concerns. A scope of work
involving a consultant is needed. Extensive public involvement of CPO,
property owners, and potential developers is needed. Metro funding of
the study will be sought.
• Scholls Area - Working with the City of Beaverton and property owners
along Scholls, as well as the residential areas adjacent to proposed
commercial areas, the City will evaluate the area between 121st, along
Scholls to and beyond the proposed Albertson's development. Capacity
for additional commercial designations on the Tigard side of Scholls must
be balanced with Beaverton's plans, the need for multi-family development
in the area, and the overall capacity of public facilities in the area.
City Council and Planning Commissions of both Tigard and Beaverton
need to be involved in this effort.
• Walnut Island - the City's annexation policy and ability to deliver public
facilities to the area must be evaluated. A decision on how annexations
impact local governments is needed from the Legislature before much can
be accomplished. Once direction is available how to process annexations
so that newly annexed properties are assessed property taxes for public
services received (to avoid an unfair subsidy by existing City residents), a
decision can be made by Council on a strategy. The strategy will be
developed by July, 1998 involving residents of the area.
City Departments Assigned:
® i 0 Community Development
9 Work with the Downtown Merchant's Association to develop the City's direction for the
downtown area, continuation of the 1996 Council goal. Community Development staff
will work with representatives of the Association and Council to develop a work plan to
develop a concept plan for the area to meet the intent of the Metro town center
designation placed on the downtown.
Association proposals for the use of City funding (approved in 1994) shall be considered
and acted upon. A decision is needed on whether these funds should be directed (all or in
part) towards development of a concept plan.
The City's role in downtown revitalization must be determined and resources identified to
carry out Council direction. 1
City Departments Assigned:
• City Administration
• Community Development
This long-term goal requires a plan to allows for annual planting of 500 trees. A
program will be set up, with an emphasis on:
• Replacing trees on public property lost through storm activity.
• Replacing trees on private and public property which have caused damage
to sidewalks in subdivisions.
• Plantings within City parks and greenways, along rivers
• Possibly a street tree planting effort.
Funding from the tree mitigation program will partially fund the effort. Private donations
and alternative public funding will be evaluated. Evaluation of problem areas
(subdivisions with heaving sidewalks, park problem areas) is needed as an initial step.
9
Parks Master Plan
As the City expands the inventory of park lands, playfields, and trails, the park master
i plan must be updated. Development plans and maintenance programs must be adjusted to
accommodate the addition of greenspaces and trail sites.
Existing plans must be evaluated to incorporate expansion of facilities and the addition of
new sites. Funding decisions are needed as the prioritization of expansion must be
consistent with funding availability.
City Departments Assigned:
• Community Development
• Public Works
• Finance
Implement the Recomm ndations of th Traffic Calming Study
In 1996 a citizen's committee evaluated traffic calming techniques and recommended a
series of actions to Council. The recommendations require further refinement by City
staff before a set of action items are carried out. Affected City Departments will take the
recommendations and prepare proposals for carrying out the recommendations in a timely
manner. If additional funding is needed to carry out the recommendations, departments j
will prepare budget adjustments to carry out the programs. i
City Departments Assigned:
• Engineering
• Community Development
• Police
i
Implement Workplace Violence Recommendations
t
a
In 1996 an employee committee reviewed the safety of City work sites and made
recommendations for improvements to procedures, security systems, and physical
settings. City Administration will present recommendations to Council to address those
l concerns that cannot be addressed using FY 1996-97 funding. Those improvements that
s can be addressed within budget will be undertaken in the next few months.
City Departments Assigned:
• City Administration (including Human Resources)
I
1 • Public Works
j • Police
{ Change Goal Setting Cycle to Fall
To better coordinate goal setting of Council, the City Manager and City departments, the
Council goal setting cycle will shift to an October or November schedule so that
coordination of goal setting and budget preparation can be accomplished.
City Departments Assigned:
• City Administration
Public Transit Improvement
Tri-Met is working with local governments to identify how to address local needs in the
area of public transit. Tigard's opportunity will occur in the Spring. Staff will advocate
improvements to create better transit choices within Tigard, for instance, connecting
neighborhoods and commercial centers.
i
A list of possible transit improvements will be generated before discussions are initiated
with Tri-Met staff. The schedule of the program will be determined by Tri-Met as it
carries out a program of discussions with all of its service area cities.
City Departments Assigned:
• Community Development
a • City Administration
J
As City revenue sources are squeezed, reliance on volunteer assistance is likely to
increase. Tigard has been very fortunate to have a successful volunteer program
primarily in the Library and on boards, committees, and task forces. Our City image is
influenced somewhat by how well neighborhoods and our main street system appears to
the traveling public. Signage in the right-of-way, and litter along sidewalks and on public
lands are potential problem areas. City resources are not always adequate to address the
gradual deterioration of the community's appearance.
Increased use of volunteerism, such as in the organization of an "adopt a street" or
"adopt a greenway" program could be a solution. Community awareness of the need for
citizens to self-police community appearance must be increased.
An effort will be made to identify volunteer opportunities and the means to carry out a
program to channel the interests and efforts of volunteers toward an improved City
appearance.
City Departments Assigned:
• City Administration
• Public Works
i s \adm\bi11\cw]goa1.doc
12
.f
RE
I~
AGENDA ITEM # .
FOR AGENDA OF rfl-t 7
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SET OVER TO
3/25/97
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Budget Adjustment for Urban Services Program
PREPARED BY: Wayne DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK l ud h^
-i
j ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL,
Shall the City Council approve a budget adjustment to provide budget authority for the Urban Services program
for the months of May and June 1997?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the attached budget adjustment.
] INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City and the County have been negotiating an intergovernmental agreement under which the City will
provide planning, engineering and Building inspection services in the adjacent unincorporated areas. The
County is willing to transfer funds on May 1 to fund the start up of this program and to provide funding for the
projects in process at that time. The City will also be entitled to revenues from fees and permits from this area
or the balance of the fiscal year and into the future.
The provision of these services in this area beginning May 1 1997 will require the hiring of nine positions.
These positions were not included in the current 1996/97 budget and therefore must be provided for in the
' attached budget adjustment. In addition, some capital equipment and materials and services will also be
necessary for use by the new employees.
The projected costs of this program for the remainder of the 1996/97 fiscal year will be accounted for in a newly
j established Urban Services Fund. Revenue in this fund will be the amount transfered to the City from the
j County estimated at $150,000 for the specific purpose of providing these services and any permits sold in May
and June for developments in the Urban Services area estimated at $79,000.
The attached resolution establishes the Urban Services Fund, recognizes the anticipated revenues and
establishes appropriations in the various programs for this effort.
OTHER A .T NATIVES CONSIDERED
Delay implementation into next fiscal year.
FISCAL NOTES
Establishes new Urban Services Fund, recognizes revenue in the amount of $229,000, sets up program
appropriations in the Urban Services Fund in the amount of $150,000 for the remainder of the 1996/97 fiscal
year.
t :3ciryriW-dot
i
i
,
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION ADJUSTING THE 1996/97 ADOPTED BUDGET FOR SERVICES PROVIDED TO
THE URBAN SERVICES AREA.
i.
WHEREAS, The Tigard City Council is anticipating the signing of an Intergovernmental Agreement with i
,j Washington County to provide development services certain areas of the County adjacent to the City which ~ .
services are projected to begin May I, 1997, and, E `
WHEREAS, The 1996/97 budget did not anticipate the provision of these services and therefore must be
amended to provide budget authority to spend funds to provide such services, and,
WHEREAS, Local budget law allows the Council to adjust the budget by resolution when fiords are .
transferred to the City for a specific purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: A new Fund is created entitled
the Urban Services Fund. This fund will be used to record all revenues and expenditures resulting from
a activities in the Urban Services area.
t
SECTION 1: Revenues are recognized in the amount of $229,000.
SECTION 2: Expenditures in the Urban Services Fund are appropriated as follows: I i
i I
Community Development Program
CD Administration $ 8,735
Building Inspection $ 91,100 i
Current Planning $ 17,550
Engineering $ 17,400
i
Contingency $ 15.215
Total $150,000
PASSED: This day of 1997.
Mayor - City of Tigard I