City Council Packet - 07/23/1996
_ Fi:".iz.:..'s:.~.':k:<..e.tw~..~....w...z _...._~r..___,......,.w., .........<.1,.,_..a ...+~,...w....... ,.,....,_....v+„ _a.~.,.a.-.~._._...... _.~..__..r....v...,....,..,,,N - -
CITY OF TIG
i j I(1 OREGON
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
_ 6 b
MEETING ~ ~ t: kFa
JULY 23,1996
s r 7~,~
p
3
u
[ 1
f - =`sa F
1 COUNCIL MEETING ILL BE E r
TELEVISED
s F
S ~ J
kF`~
j
? i:%adWjolccpktt.doc
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
'
A, t:
-
. .
'3 - r } - - ,
a. yaR sY T * i c
-T a
Cn 'r{ .1_.S.f 3 k t
'E-s 5- -11- fix, r- t - "
_
,k stC x- ra E - - - - - - - - - .d.
a s x 4 r
~-I 3 - r i a
-.=~4b ~r , - 1 S-,
- I _Q
R
Vii, :x 7" - r h-q t
ra ~s _ yr 'k _
~i 4~
a
-...,x.:.. -
::`7"'
-+-era;Vm ,,N -e;r:... _
~"Y:?:„., ~.w new
:.{s~.x, 'A ..4.e~. Vi_
~T VC I1VMRY
5' 8 J;L+¢~^R."JR'kE~*3`g~yy$ Rr
x 1W .1 If
y~L yppi*i,aaSa p~~ f s
ti x ~ due «x}` - -
.wµ~.. - ..,r J - _ ,
.
- - - ...i 'es::3"~:'.b,":tX:Sa.; ~W ;RVV<::',1.;<:;.\^ _ _,.~rv5°-° r
t - - f a\ :~C 3~C` c eR - \ 21 \ !~;'u`.• :I' t L~ 4 - £ ,3*xC -
x -S '
PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the ,5 r~, ,
z appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the ' s t , '
x Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda Items are asked to a kL
Y 4~ s
be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda b
M
a contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator. (1 `1D., '
mfr" p(SS}h d.Yi.+fiAC -
T.11-1- 11
~P y--
Times noted are estimated: it is recommended that persons interested in testifying v r. q~ , °
be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business
agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. " '0-~~
_ 7 s~, 6
11. ~ ,71
s~ Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and -
should be scheduled for Council meetin s b noon on the Monday Prior to the s _,0 - „
Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - ' ,
Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). ~g i W~ ~ 'z
#i
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: _s
Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing , 'sue P
impairments, and 3
Y 'yi'`e
r ? Qualified bilingual interpreters. 111", I
C y r M,
_ - x 4 . EE -
-11
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is b ; ' + l
important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your
x need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone rt x'
Rfi numbers as listed above: 639-4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - r44
r
4 '
fj x
t Telecommunications Devises for the Deaf)., r
5
} SEE ATTACHED AGENDA t- t~ f f!
{ ~C
} ~x 3 ,
U G
COUNCIL AGENDA -JULY 23, 1996 -PAGE 1 # nx§.,t `
~ r L
3 5 4 - y
•v _ - F( - Z - 4
d
br
f
~ •h - 1 'h' - k , ~1I yl
r A S {
[ - S - S W +l~, 4
1~ - R t YJ ,
1 {f ~yF
M , r,", F i ~ ~ ~ ~ , r L ~ ! . ~ , , , " ~ , - il
I r , i , I . f ~ I ~ . - " r - , - , " , ~ - ~ 'r I , I F ' - k F Y
- -
-i. _ _
ih n-1, - - _ -
l X
, ~ ~ . ~ , 7 1 - ~ , . ~ ~ I , 59 .
s _ 4 -
y~- tu'" - --z a -
-.11 I .g f4
A
- Lti " d'w" k V f - t {
< "t A rt - - - - ° i - - - y :
s
r " d
t." §~y h ~...L....»..... .uua,.;'s....AwNrz.,s-_+v.........w......_... _._..._.,7 4,~
y^ 4- - £ t - - t Pj„ ,tom - .C
¢f
N tR } - -
.1i
-y_f jl`~iv ` - 4'sr. --'+~ip4 : .ro 95.x.. _
. - :y :tj- '
t~ - , R
.1. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JULY 23 1996 _j ;rv- y':: `
AGENDA r
Y- - - - 6:50 p.m. t r - ✓ > [ - -
STUDY SESSION
' > The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session under the - , 6
provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), et (h) to discuss labor ' „
--x -
f 4 relat-ons, real Droverty transactions, current and pending litigation g ; Z
..e: t• therefore, t r, ;
A_ Issues. All discussions within this session are co-311. ld..eWaLt
nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those present. k-
i Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session, e - E ;
gym, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. r 'fix
> Discussion: City Facilities Space Planning '
~
st s .
z > Agenda Review st t , piiir~~~' I
- g [
, 7:30 p.m. I
1. BUSINESS MEETING ~4#
_ t 1.1 Call to Order - City Council ex Local Contract Review Board , y ' ,
xi, i 3''rt S k^`§ 1
.2 Roll Call c
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance ~ -t 1
1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports 1 -
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items g z"~~ ,F tiro ; s
k"
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) c ~ ,Ott a
3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be ti ;Y
AN% ' enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request ~ r ~ '
. I
that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. ' ° M , ~ -
Motion to: -
, ~ I
3.1 Approve City Council Minutes: June 18 and 25, 1996 E ' a ` ~ 7. ~
-
3.2 Approve Municipal Court Judge's Contract - Resolution No. 96- ~ ~ ~ a -
3.3 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Tigard I. , -
and the Tigard/Tualatin School District -Resolution No. 96-_
3.4 Accept Transfer of Jurisdiction a Portion of Durham Road from the : y,r t'p
' Oregon Department of Transportation i
i1~&>
3.5 Approve Acquisition of Property on Walnut Street at TiedemanT ,
3.6 Local Contract Review Board: Award Contract for Architectural "
/t; t -
~ Services for the City Hall Expansion to Hanson, Dunahugh, Nicholson k~ y ~
Architects PC, Portland, Oregon ~
3.7 Receive and File: Proclamation - National Clown Week - August 1 ¢,a ,V-", * ~ P
through 7, 1996 ~~x<
' € '
Y 3.8 Authorize the City Administrator to Sign Documents Associated with
the Mentor Reservoir Special Use Application with Washington : 4~=m,
County Y:
1
c , z ,x o 9
c y 3 tF rJSy
< d ( tt E
COUNCIL AGENDA -JULY 23 1996 -PAGE 2 t ~ r
4
E
id 'rm #
L ~6 - { n' - :.2p ^3c5F ^P"y.~+ A CR^'- _ - - «rP 1a+x Y z-J4 ~~1` F 2 -S 1 ` _
f t 5. _ t.l.s , k
v
x
K
~z, , , , ,_~t:~: , ~ L - ~ L 1, " J ~
4 8d l
',m..5~ at
~~w
js -
F
4 '3
t ttr- -f - Y
t. N
E p F .
• Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items
requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate }
( discussion will be considered Immediately after the Council has voted w r
on those items which do not need discussion. y
4. CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18.164 OF THE 4 5
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE AUTHORIZING EXCEPTIONS TO
UNDERGROUNDiNG UTILITY REQUIREMENTS x'- s a
• City Administrator; r F -
- - -
Ia. DR IDI If- L,CADIIId- 1AIIACI_7NII%V -IAW C ♦ A ffpp C_V V..-
a-vr~rncnu®~,vc r~.r~iw g:e:=;.~~-~_- -_~xrx.2•;;~-..__ _ _
AMENDMENT (CPA) 96.0004/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 96- t -
0003/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) 96-0002 SATTLER SITE F x `x x a .
REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map and zoning map on 27.5
acres located on three parcels west of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW 5j.
? Sattler Street. The application seeks to change the eastern 8.5 acres, along `
ant w c'y
Hall Blvd., from Medium Density Residential/R-12 to Medium Density
r ti, 2 3 s z_;
Residential/R-7; and to change the western 19 acres from Low Density
= E
Residential/R-4.5 to Medium Density Residential/R-7. LOCATION: West
of Hall Boulevard and south of Sattler Street. 'a
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.2(2),
2.1.1, 6.1.1, 6.3.3, 8.1.1 and 12.2.1(2); Community Development Code
chapters 18.22 and 18.32; and Oregor. Administrative Rules Chapter 660 Y
;t Division 12. ZONE: R-4.5 (Single-Family Residential) allows single- r t
family detached units, manufactured homes, farming family day care and
a
conditional uses such as single-family attached units, duplex units, religious
;:nom
assembly and schools. R-12 (Multiple-Fatuity Residential) allows single-
family detached and attached units, duplex units, multiple-family units,' y,
residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivisions, public{
support and family day care services and conditional uses such as community
recreation, religious assembly, schools, hospitals and residential care i° ~
facilities., F
a. Open Public Hearing
b. Declarations or Challenges
C. Staff Report: Community Development Department
' d. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents, Rebuttal) x z . a
e. Staff Recommendation '
f. Council Questions
g. Close Public Hearing
%
h. Council Consideration: Motion giving direction to City staff.
Y q } i
t4 S
COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 3 xf
of
f - _
} 5
L
d
+ z at -'`~-s z
tv,
zyy
r
~ ~ G
u
- _
,rF
- _
y -
'mod ..=r..` t sF'` q - _ - v _ Y +s,_- ~ffi .mac
9 M - - _ _ "-'x° _ rr , - m
- L _ sw c - c.. i
5 A f/K
k _~i~ 4t - `s g fiz ti t
.;~7 m
~ RP
M P R
A j 3 i. k - "x
- Syr _ ( {4 t
g . PLAN
r 6. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) - COMPREHENSIVE
1~ I
1-1
a AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-0001 BLEDSOE r 11 AE- 7 REQUEST: Amend the text of the Urbanization section of the
Comprehensive Plan by adding a new policy as fuilovils: 10.1.4 A.:
exception to Policy 10.1.3 is that the city may assign zoning closest to '°a
~ existing development in low density residential established areas. tt s: ,t> F ; , F w
LOCATION: Citywide. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide rx
j Planning Goals 1, 2, 10 and 14, Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.1, - ; E " h
, 2.1.1 and 6.1.1; Tigard Community Development Code chapter 18.30 and, txK
Division 12. ZONE: N/A
,11 7 _ '-:n.'s-...+.s..e Rule Chapter 660, -
--sfin -
ana _ -VEC rw-.....
y' ' iw~F
a. Open Public Hearing`' x>k
7 b, SS 17'S,7 "}'Hsi~d C<"' F Y ht yi
r b. Declarations or Challenges
F x ~ g~i 1 ,
C. Staff Report: Community Development Department - "
d. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents, Rebuttal) . "
k e. Staff Recommendation=
f. Council Questions
f2
g. Close Public Hearing ?
h. Council Consideration: Motion giving direction to City staff. r
N
~'1 - "
7. ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL g
CODE REGARDING PAYMENT OF A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT tax )W -
ASSESSMENT IN INSTALLMENTS - ORDINANCE NO. 96- - 4
. City Administrator, - x =
i' Y ti
s r s .s,~ s a r~
ti 7. NON-AGENDA ITEMS$ -
xr
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive i,~-- ; I'll"
{
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), at (h) to E~
1
discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending ? ~ 7,, F
1, litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are ~ ~
confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those ~3 }
present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this t,- ,
session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. r ~ N , r
Ask
r
9. ADJOURNMENT s ~ .
~r,~,. 3 ,
° a - t:\adm\athy\cwBenda\960723.doc~' r;+`~-{'_~`~
a S 'd,, z
r
5
Y k
a
t C
a r,- - r s r - L
COUNCIL AGENDA -JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 4 ~4~ x , `
~0 3 * t-,f f'Y3v i ,
n
xn pai
y f y .-wsisn+neaw°f'{s'Pms S- -y -0Y3 { I ,I
5
k 1 J -P t 3 _ - rte= - s y k r
( _ _ - t,f k
x2 - Z r 5 - - td¢ -
- i,~,,,- ~ , ~ - W Y
x a rr
G i j
4 -,rig
~ 1 i ~f .sf H' t° j~ - e
- - - a
L _ _
- .fr* m'!
' i y I
t X
I -e 1, r ~ , , , ~ ~ ,N ; -
~ . - I - L I I , . ~ - ~ . ~ I ,
3
~q
r r , c c a a
. . _ , - -
}
,
t Sr~r
Y
-
r , c
Af - i y t i _
'AJSy Fr o # - J i - a,-t { -
` k. xd _ _ - - J YZ
x ~y .1 zr~ ,s - - w=f^t..,.m .:..,,b..._...,....._._._._ _ x _.._..,._.....m.. _ : a &.p,",
~ i ,j t a .
3• r r k
L Agenda Item No.
4
Meeting of d /a-71Rta t x
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL r
r
, MEETING MINUTES -JULY 23, 1996 ~
- r S s j v
aka,F S'y{
t
,
ti, > Meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Jim Nicoli 'J a t z jj
p 4 { s _
Y "
3 > Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli, Councilors Paul Hunt and Brian Moore. ~ . 4 Y
„fit , ,
4
> Staff Present: City Administrator Bill Monahan; Legal Counsel Pam Beery; Legal
r _ Counsel Garry Bullard (Executive Session only); Planning Manager Dick , x ;
2WerSdOrri; Legal GOUnSeI Robert Franz; Asst. to tnG ~.uy r dmiiiSu'awn i. , n ,.,J - .
N?vrton; Associate Planner Ray Valone; City Recorder Catherine Wheatley; Human I [ _ , t, ' . F
r 3
Resources Director Sandy Zodrow. r
> Executive Session: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 6:32 F,_ ~ , , ' .
p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (3), & (h) to discuss laborer
f relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. ; ~t,~,, N
- }c °rv i 'tc}'a
> Executive Session adjourned at 7:36 p.m. ~ -w,
„ ,
Ma
- > Agenda Review 3 . }
a _
1. BUSINESS MEETING g- z`' 6~ 3 .sF
_ Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board XA 4 zs 'j~
'
Mayor Nicoli called the business meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. ,,.,-,,M, ~,3. ~ 1
fit,
• Council Present: Mayor Nicoll, Councilors Paul Hunt, Brian Moore, Bob e,,' -1-t~; - ,
Rohlf and Ken Scheckla. <
~ 1 - - £
• Council Communications/Liaison Reports: None j t
Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items: None ~ _ -
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA ,
Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, King City, cited an Oregonian z,~ E
{ article (July 22, 1996) which reported on Tigard's efforts to find water partners. Hey'
asked if the future possible intergovernmental water agreement between Tigard 2 R. ~
- and Tualatin Valley Water District would usurp the present agreement between the x-
City of Tigard, the City of Durham, the City of King City, and the unincorporated x
g areas. He also asked if the future water director would be voted upon if the
N, r t possible agreement with the Tualatin Valley Water District went through. r
} , r F`
' Mayor Nicoli said that any contracts which the City of Tigard has already signed `7
x - F with any other water providers were a matter of public record. However no one in I 4, " "
- the City could comment on any contracts currently under negotiation. He said that
f r he did not think any of the negotiations would be detrimental to the partnership Y t
7 -
between Tigard, King City, Durham and the Tigard Water District. He said that the w E
r E ~t MR'' F iX 1; T
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 1fi" r
a M &5x
F s f FLa44*'"i° {
{ 4 1
I - ate- -3 ; f' t
fy ~ k
, G
L " d f [
{ per) 4 ~ '
F
d i _ ;X ~ £
,x F
x n~ ,
d - - s ti n r
a A x pr . ,
F
r
. 1___..,..... i.~~.. w.,. ~Y__ i_,._~. 3~_.~.xc._~~ Lt v_,~ .._~.u-. _ _ "Y"" : . -.1_.. ::4. _ ~f_ _?"r_ _ t.
R
z
- _ _
C .a'1 ate. 7 3. t L
.}T3 ~Y L
`~r' 0 is ' Jt~ 3- 3 - F t - -erg- -
'F'k"4' ,='.y- `3 1 k.... :...n..w ..«_...........+ar,..-......~~.r.,....s-}s..ms`~_. _..._.v............_...._. ...........,.__..w,..~~.x..o f 'TC
R`11- A 3 s
~,js.-~~["- {gyp 1- k~
41- _ `j',45 _ ' t C -
f e } , x - TF _ S z} _
x4 - Yc }
` City was not closing the door to any water source at this time, including Lake T -
~fi,~ Oswego. f
3 C i+-~
} ~ vim, ~ , City Administrator Monahan stated that Tigard has kept the Intergovernmental a
° Water Board apprised of its efforts and/or potential contracts to secure water from g t y
any of the providers in the region. He said that they were still waiting for the `e -
contract on the new rates from Lake Oswego. xF {
3. CONSENT AGENDA j ,4^': ;
{ ~ .yy k j~ 3t
`i 1 - 5.- .l S -.i
r Mr. Monahan asked to pull Item 3.4 for future consideration because of questions `
nn fhe ,al-Llnfion of the cost - -11
1 Motion by Counciivr Hunt, seconded by Gvunaiivr Rohii, to adopt the `~"f
r
s Consent Agenda, pulling Item 3.4. Y -V,i - ,
j- ~
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, er s ~ ~ - 1
Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") t ,
t a,j '
3.1 Approve City Council Minutes: June 18 and 25, 1996 .
3.2 Approve Municipal Court Judge's Contract -Resolution No. 96-44 ~ l ; -*x~t
3.3 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Tigard and the atuyfi° L .
Y r Tigard/Tualatin School District -Resolution No. 96 45
3.4 Accept Transfer of Jurisdiction a Portion of Durham Road from the Oregon u~ , s 'y
` Department of Transportation
3.5 Approve Acquisition of Property on Walnut Street at Tiedeman - , G '
E -1
4` 3.6 Local Contract Review Board: Award Contract for Architectural Services for Y a fir' 3 r r
the City Hall Expansion to Hanson, Dunahugh, Nicolson Architects PC, , a
Portland, Oregon ' > b ~ I
N
• Consent Agenda -Items Removed for Separate Discussion E , - r r
5
4. CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18.164 OF THE TIGARD `
MUNICIPAL CODE AUTHORIZING EXCEPTIONS TO UNDERGROUNDING r -
Kr UTILITY REQUIREMENTS x
I 'L Mr. Monahan presented the staff report. He reviewed the Council direction to staff ,
Ili 1~ to bring back an ordinance that allowed the funds set aside by developers for r ?
undergrounding utilities to be placed into a single account. He explained that 4 ' 1c
11111111-11- I.- ltzl,'~
currently the monies were held in separate accounts with the intent of spending the I
'
money in the areas in which the funds were collected; however that process has
not worked well because they could not get enough funds in any one account to ; y F x'1 ; t 1
L pay for undergrounding utilities in a given area. ~ , ,',n- ,
@. ,r , .
. `
Mr. Monahan stated that the ordinance provided for the Council to review on an . "
annual basis the funds available and proposed projects in order to determine where " y -
the money could be allocated for the benefit of the community. . `
{ s 4 x $ In response to a question by Councilor Rohlf, Legal Counsel Pam Beery stated 'r { Y ir, 11
+
y s "r that the Council was free to combine the funds.
« , TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 2 ` # s
y G F
t f e1s ,Y
f
S , YTS-- ~t } j {
is -'t T;,- r°k„. s - - ^~-'r*-saz:.re~"~':~c -t _ . :.4~
J
- 3- - 1 - - _ - -f
Y' Y z r nt E j
f _ - a , ,mows- e t
'If -a t,- y -
x `f
-r s - - - a
a 3 - ,qtr _ - a 3 3
,r, jj6 tk %J a - - SN 1
f.., !
.t, Y
C h
i 7
;
11 " ik Et _
4i - kZei 1 - 4 F '.i
c i ♦ _ - - , i f i 1{
, ~ i ',-,C~,,;~-i~,;~'r " ~ ,~,,~i~7,i,. ~ 7~L, , ' j _ - ~ 2~ , , ~ ,r,' , ~ - ,L:~ , L ' ' , I
rl~, ` - - - , - , ~ _ L , ~ . ~ - - - 11 ~ r " L , - 1, , ,1 'T . . 1 1 r, , J
, - ~ _ , , - ~~,~i",~,- ~ - r~~ " ,
, ~1~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ r . : ~ ~ - - .,L , ` -L`,,.-,~ , , , v "T--- " ~
, " ~ F " , , - L, , , . ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ , , r , ~ r I ~ - `1~11 4-~ ~ ~
-
,
tea. I._.,.~,.: .m. - h,.. - --~I...z.=. i _ _ - __.._-1--.--' ~_..7~ .
a-; > _ : -
f }
a
x Sri F , ,7 - --~,~`-":-~t--, ~ . - . ~ I . , , ~ . . ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ IL; ~ ~ ~ - , I e , , ~ ~ , -
' ° tt. ik y -K F - G
g, v~ ~ t
w+
-71i
, - - -
rt
; 11 "c k"~~z I S s w -
fR - j
k , ¢ i-'-
a
ra Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt T 4
r
z Ordinance No. 96-27. j -
The City Recorder read the number and title of the Ordinance.
z PK,a"
s ORDINANCE NO. 96-27, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18.164 OF THE ~ F
F e e
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE AUTHORIZING EXCEPTIONS TO - - " -
UNDERGROUNDING UTILITY REQUIREMENT t ~ , t
- Motion was approved by roll call vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, - ` r
Councilors Hunt Rohlf and Scheckla vote' "yes" Councilor Moore abstained.)
4r,
5. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ` W
(CPA) 96-00041ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 96-0031PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) fi { x a(
1-1 ;
96-0002 BATTLER SITE
REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map and zoning map on 27.5 acres , - -11 -11 .11 ~
located on three parcels west of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Battler Street. i ` r - - ~ _
The application seeks to change the eastern 8.5 acres, along Hall Blvd., from K "
Medium Density Residential/R-12 to Medium Density Residential/R-7; and to
I change the western 19 acres from Low Density Residential/R-4.5 to Medium'
Density Residential/R-7. LOCATION: West of Hall Boulevard and south of Battler ` kz
Street.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.2(2), 2.1.1, r k#,
6.1.6, 6.3.3, 8.1.1 and 12.2.1(2); Community Development Code chapters 18.22 ; p
and 18.32; and Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 660 Division 12. ZONE: R- * rC _ j
4.5 (Single-Family Residential) allows single-family detached units, manufactured x
homes, farming, family day care and conditional uses such as single-family - 4 r l- "I „ J
r3 s
attached units, duplex units, religious assembly and schools. R-12 (Multiple-Family
Residential) allows single-family detached and attached units, duplex units, F xt
multiple-family units, support and family day care services and conditional uses ~ ill I
I- 11"
such as community recreation, religious assembly, schools, hospitals and ' ? ~ .
residential care facilities. I ~ ;
f: _il; I " . a. Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the public hearing. " ~~~"iF~~;. t
b. Declarations or Challenges a 'r' r
s
i Councilor Scheckla declared that he would remove himself from this hearing o } gi ` 1 j
because he was related to the property owners. He stepped down from the ~ ~ - .4.
{ bench. x ' -
,
There were no other declarations or challenges. ' ,
k i
c. Staff RePort ( +
r --ys,j _ ",f-
s Ray Valone, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He stated that § -
r ' the 27.5 acre site was annexed to the City in 1982 and designated as urban ` M1
-~e " , - as< r - r -
t low density. He reviewed the two different zoning classifications on the site. : _
; 1-1
I w~ He said that there were no objections from City departments or the Oregon
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 3
y {
_ ~ i
Y
+ {
p. _ x
aY R _ - - - rF { t Y
y
{
# - -,tr i
- , LL ~ ~ . ~ . I , - , r ' ~ ~ I . r , I - ~ I- , '
7 ~ i b x' .r •I
f- fr - - - - - - ary%
p -r
-A~"_ F - _ - - - k 1
-r l - 4 i
Y
F
P ;
r i. --r - - -
-
_ -
- - - -y '
~r.~w,.__.. .ti ..c~-_~, _..~~-n-.._- t-~r,_. - -~.j i~....,~..,r~~^ - - r_....._--..y..-..a.~- mar r
- - -
-
ti
j 1 { l _
_,_,M~IfLA 01_i~_"_ , ''t _,"I", _i -l"; i , . , , I . ~ .,~f~ " W
S+ - - _ J Y - _
N-, - - .
1-y' a`•'S M Lt S yl
P'r ; W S'C. - -
~ % i } ' y 9 u.'.. l,.,.....c.a>:..-...«.~~.--- ' . Z-. ......y,... { q 5 ) !
IA
r. ?
Department of Transportation. He did note, however, receipt of a letter from l'
1-1 r-` the Summerfeld Civic Association expressing concerns over increased
ft density and two-story houses; the Association intended to work with the 4
developer to address their concerns. He mentioned a letter in support of the ,
project received from Mallard Lake Homeowners Association and a letter',
from the Hamlet Street residents requesting that the western perimeter . i
remain at R-4,5 with an easement to buffer their properties.
r Mr. Valone stated that staff found that the proposal met all the applicable rv , T
a Plan and r)PVPlnnme.^.t r.3d° ,v -T,.;,z-1-1--'7,, .'-.'•x=._.. _
Comprehensiv _ _In rovievv criteria. The applicant ~i
has ade a case for a physical change in circumstances concerning the # _
li~ transportation system that served the site (pages 3-4 in the staff report). He n
said that staff believed a "mistake" was made in rezoning the land from R-5 t ~ r "3
to R-12. (ll
i Mr. Valone said that the proposal also rEiet the rest of the review criteria` ~ i`
} ODOT found that this proposal would not significantly impact Hall Blvd, and € _
the City Engineering Department found that it would not significantly impact t
the local road system either. He noted that the Planning Commission 5 rY a `
recommended approval , x } E ° , ~
,
In response to a question from Councilor Hunt, Mr. Valone concurred that ti r i Z. a~ { q
- the net effect of this proposal on the site density was nearly zero. Under the ~ ? , ' s
two current zones, the density was 190 houses; by changing the density to ~ 1 +~q~ }y
the same zone for the entire site, the density would be 191 houses. °n _
I . '4 ~ r~~w~-
Councilor Hunt asked Ms. Beery if he had a conflict of interest because he s F `~r, p TM
was part of the Summerfield Civic Association. Ms. Beery said that she,
thought that it was up to the Councilor's discretion. x ;
} _ M
In response to a comment from Mayor Nicoli, Mr. Monahan explained that 4 r
the "mistake" in changing the zone from R-5 to R-12 was not so much a -mot
"mistake" as it was a result of the legislative zoning changes done as part of t s
the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning maps developed in 1982/83. g « ,
-7 E
d. Public Testimony` ,r
Mayor Nicoll explained the public testimony procedures. - 1 - .
PROPONENTS ` , f
-k `i f # 4 t
- 9 Larry York, Matrix Development, stated that their intent was to build single-family x
detached homes on this site. He cited Matrix's experience in building communities
throughout the Portland Metro area, noting in particular their care to be sensitive to " ` f
the existing community. He said that Matrix had no interest in an R-12 zone. F
' Chris Eaton W & H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Ave, Beaverton, the applicant's .
consultant, stated that they concurred with the recommendations of staff and the _ ,x i -3
- Planning Commission. She reviewed the proposal to even out the zoning across I
;g the entire site to R-7, pointing out that there was no net increase in the density. r ~
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 4 `
„ f
- t
` {
_ ,
'h - vr.rrvu... m.us,. ( - - a'T -¢r _
.
d k
_ 2 5 - SS E
- - - -
i!
d i _ J fE[c
r
/ f s
~ _`~`~11'1_ , 1 ' , I , I , ~ : ~ . I . 11 , ~ ~ : ~ , I , , : I I , ' ' ' ' - ~1' " " - - j L11 , , [ ~ , , . , ~ :
C
1; i
Y
' - - - -
,
'
- - 1`
. .
*
.
: .u - .
~ - -
&R~ _ - 4
~~rr,~ 3^c + - - ~i
~Y --',-S _-F _ -
-a we 5a~ f "s - f
t
, . ' . - t - - f
- - - - - l - ~
1
_ _ " _ 4 - 1 ~ -
fS,
Y
t ''4i •,5S ~4 ` J
3 kr ~ She stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request for
+ ( a planned development ovrlay. - f
F- i s y_ a . -
x Ms. Eaton responded to the letter from the Hamlet Street residents. She explained ,
the Tigard Code requirement of a "density transition zone" between R-7`
development adjacent to R-4.5 development which included a 100 foot buffer strip. I
u She noted the Mallard Lake Homeowners Association's support of the proposal. -
OPPONENTS tG
r-4 t t r .r r ,
Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, King City, stated that he was `°f+ r > ' `
neither for nor against the proposal. He asked a series of questions: r
- Would the City go along with the plan as staff has shown it to him;
Has the City done a report on its local job market opportunities concerning ti
the site (page 9); p `mot ' . + i r 't
What was the lowest price of housing to buy or rent (page 9, Figures A & B). x h.:~:
K -
Mr. Polans said that he has perceived a trend in Tigard in the last several years to " F F ;
attract affluent people rather than non-affluent people. He asked if there was a ;r 1: +g --g- # q
= the Cit 's b economic class.
report that broke down y population y kF :a _
r,,
Grace Hamlin, 15360 SW Alderbrook Circle, expressed concern about the traffic wlkv ` 'a
that would be coming through Summerfeld because of the new development. ` ~ t 4 ' x
Martha Hemmelright, 8855 SW Hamlet, asked for clarification on the practical t I 14 Y
application of the "density transfer zone" and for an explanation of what was z ;0Y J . 'rJ
allowed in the R-7 zone. _ 1 z{~ , w
REBUTTAL x~€m
r° a x--w
Chris Eaton, W & H Pacific, stated that the buffer zone meant that the lot sizes ~a
along the areas adjacent to the R-4.5 zone within 100 feet would be slightly larger t' 1
and that the housing size and height would remain the same in that zone as in the ,
R-4.5 zone. -
Ms. Eaton noted that any development would increase traffic but pointed out that 5
rz - 4
this development had clear access from Sattler down Hall and shouldn't move ~ € x r
~ r
' through Summerfeld. She stated that traffic studies and counts would be done
( and that any traffic impact would be mitigated through the development process. ` k :
She pointed out that the site plans and street layout have not been completed and s
mentioned that the direction from the City involved connecting some streets through
the development because of the Transportation Goal requirements for connectivity. f z - '
r j
4M x ,
j Ms. Eaton said that the exact costs of the units has not yet been determined but i r ¢ a
s that the developer planned on moderate-cost, detached single-family homes. t
SZ i Z-e k
z Ms. Eaton concurred with the City Administrator that the dates of the annexation t r
l proposal and the City rezoning were very close and might explain what happened, I
{ G ' although there was no evidence in the record to explain why the decision was s
,~~.-j-,,~~ ~J - F -
- s made. s y 4 t N,_ I
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JULY 23, 1996 -PAGE 5
„_J
} r
' f
4
Y. f f
y E
1} t` •.m.r:ae!: Ss'*' z:..:-c;"zti'r^rx-e.,.. .....a.* _ ..;t yam, v5
.r -
.s _4 - - -5„ yT
t
6 fi)
- i iii~~~~r _ 1
r
rt r -
i }
i
"Y _
-
I- T~ . _ - .w..T~.~ f7 - _ _ ,~"n~-1 l l
r
} t .
_Y. -_.,v.-:.L._ -v._ .2...il _ . - 1.S _71 _ 1 -v. _I_
hC 3
f`n's" - _ - - a - .F'
- ham' T $
RR's-L'4,F Sit-egL'}., - _ - p
.t uli- 4
,t _
7
4
a P Mr. Valone reviewed the description of the R-7 zone: a single-family residential - , t
. s zone of 7 units per acre or 5,000 square foot minimum lot size. Dick Bewersdorff, " }
5 Planning Manager, commented that one difference between the R-7 and R-4.5 x
zones was that attached units and duplex units were outright uses in R-7 but r re 1~
Vullu iUVlla1 UJGj 1111\-Y. J. k I~ry
Mr. Monahan reviewed the circumstances in 1981-1983 that might have lead to a I
- = zone change without any evidence in the record. He pointed out that the 'r- - ' t; F„5- _
r =1? , ;
Comprehensive Plan anal sis of the entire ci was a le islative look at the
- y ty 9 t~' ,-z:;__ -.s' e®
community. He also noted that the effort at that time to identify properties to meet i a «$r ry =
the Metro Housing Rule of 10 units per acre wasn't concluded until close to the end ) t
;A
1 of the process. a v e ' r
Mr. Monahan corrected a statement on Figure C (page 21) that none of the ~ g '
t upzoned ProPert ies were develoPed, cng the Timberline Apartments developed in " a ° :
t
fg
1989 as a result of upzoned property. :111. 7~
i t -t~'_ yr^ is
In response to a request from Councilor Hunt, Mr. Bewersdorff reviewed the City
; planning and development review process. He said that the applicant would meet _
with the neighborhood prior to submitting an application to the City, and that the
Planning Commission would hold a hearing to consider the site plan, layout, traffic
impacts, etc. F { ` ,q t . 1r,
~
Mr. Polans contended that none of his questions have been answered. He stated ~ t
A fti
that he opposed the proposal and suggested a continuance. : . 4
i J x s .,L,; t,M ,
Y e. Staff Recommendation ~
h
Mr. Valone recommended approval of the proposal based on the criteria. - t y
f. Council Questions: None . F F
' s -
'
, ° . ` 11
g. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing. < } ~ ~ F
'
r h. Council Consideration x r z;,. a
_ . _ `
Mr. Monahan reviewed the Council's alternatives: to direct staff to bring ;x F ~
back an ordinance and final order approving the change or to direct staff to ~ G ~
rrr
bring back a resolution denying the change. rj , 3
U I- ¢
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Rohif, to direct staff : ' ,f
to return with an ordinance and final order for adoption by the Council. ? 1 ,Zt
7 , E't n t.i
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor r
Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, and Rohlf voted "yes.") 4
' _O"T L J
4 Councilor Hunt noted that Mr. Valone was leaving the City to work at Metro. He * r C
r ' N400 expressed appreciation for Mr. Valone's work and thanked him. t~,,- ; s
"x - d~ -
-t 41
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 6 `
Y 7 k R R, 1L i
~a _ ` 4 1
a' - f r y d
, J
1 Y ' t YE- } t
I' ; ; r ]
a
i(4
f
{F Y wk lPr f 1 y £ - . E ti A' L
- ~ . I r ~ . ~ ~ -4 ' ~ I ~ , - ~ , 11 ~ I"' , - ~11 L r - - . ~t~- ~
-3~
s_
T
- -
r-
! R& ~ I ~
, u w
F'
M"
>f~
T,
a
4`t`js
c
t 2 t-_ * tT J
t- - J-,
F ~
x..,/,
i
s? Councilor Scheckla returned to the bench.
3
6. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) -COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT} r l
(CPA) 96-0001 BLEDSOE
REQUEST: Amend the . t ifr r
~~~C ~~x~ of the Urbanization section of the Comprehensive Plan ~ K r
by adding a new policy as follows: 10.1.4 An exception to Policy 10.1.3 is that the F' 4 -
i ` city may assign zoning closest to existing development in low density residential , '
established areas. ^i
y
LOCATION: Citywide. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planing F ,
Goals 1, 2, 10 and 14; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1 and 6.1.1; ; yz a
Tigard Community Development Code chapter 18.30; and Oregon Administrative ` ` *4
Rule Chapter 660, Division 12. ZONE: N/A
7 ; a. Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the public hearing. r 4{
-l
b. Declarations or Challenges: None . 3"
i
`max
C. Staff Report
& i
t .-k
11 ;1 Mr. Valone presented the staff report. He stated that the amendment ~4N
request would apply to properties within the urban planning area being a : f»: xa k -
annexed to the City. He said that the current City policy was to assign , a
1 zoning to newly annexed properties that most closely matched the County F?'!~
zoning; it was part of the urban planning agreement with Washington - -
County. , 3<,
1 2 _ t f Y
Mr. Valone reviewed the background of Mr. Bledsoe's request, noting that rrf t k rig'
the West and Central CITs presented the request to Council on September - , `svas;,a f.;, ~jzAf.4x
12, 1995. He said that Council agreed to waive the Comprehensive Plan ~
amendment fee and include concerns about zoning in the next IGA review, x ~ +
He stated that Mr. Bledsoe submitted this amendment in a timely fashion, `2 - ' {
and provided a rebuttal to the staff report. 4 f~~m~
Mr. Valone stated that all appropriate departments or entities were notifed.'c 'E -
He said that Metro responded that the proposal was not consistent with the Y~
direction of 2040 and would substantially reduce residential areas within the r t
incorporated areas. Washington County staff expressed concerns on its tx Y~r
impact on the Metro Housing Rule (page 6), its effect on infill development, - r - '
its possible contradiction to regional planning and increased densities, and .
its effect on Tigard's ability to accommodate its share of growth. He said that - °m
' ! the Central and West CITs supported the proposal, the South CIT supported
lower densities in general, and the East CIT had no comment. ~ ,
a
- ry Mr. Valone stated that staff found that this proposal did not meet all the
relevant criteria, including Goal 2, Goal 10 and Comprehensive Plan Policy'
1.1.1. He said that staff could not make a finding that Comprehensive Plan" g;' ?j
Policy 6.1.1 was satisfied; although the amendment would not cause the City ~r r 1
F,- to drop out of compliance with the Metro Housing Rule, it would increase the C L
t possibility of reducing residential density with resulting loss of incremental , E
' housing opportunities. i -
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 7 r'
ff
r ~J
~,-F ~ I , ~v~ ~
f
r
h
- - } d -
{ x
f _ _ _ T -
, r - _ i~ "j
E r
~ , : ~ - . ; , I , ,-9 - , - -
- - _ F
} - -
CC 3., )
, i 'J r TT .t.__-r.. _ r. r _ b!?+:r~c.__ .~~.~c .v-..f^r _i.J_ r_ - ._F.._ ._~__v._t [r A.i 4.. - -2_v.urL_
0-1
e.
4 ~ t
' Mr. Valone noted other staff concerns regarding how the proposal would be v P`
implemented (pages 7, 8), the fairness to property owners and the effect of
the proposal on current region-wide planning efforts. He said that the t X4;
Planning Commission recommended denial (8-0). !
d. Public Testimony .
PROPONENTS
y
' Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, applicant, presented signatures of people in the 4
Walnut Island who supported the measure. He reviewed the Metro map of r
redevelopable lands, pointing out that there were few redevelopable lands in the
areas that the City would be annexing in the future.
2 i ~ Z ^y 4 -
j Mr. Bledsoe stated that one of the tools that local government used to maintain high 5 x
i quality neighborhoods was zoning that closely matched the density of the k
neighborhoods. He contended that his proposal would not hurt the City in any way.F ^ {
Mr. Bledsoe noted the current City policy regarding the zoning of newly annexed a r
land. He said that prior to policy 10.1.3, (12 years ago) the City did not assign
zoning until a month or two after annexation, and that the zoning was assigned per `
the request of the property owner. He cited City Council minutes from 1969 and _x
1979 in support of his claim.
{ j Mr. Bledsoe said that zoning for buildable land was different from zoning for 5 u p e
? 7
established neighborhoods. Closely matching the zoning of annexed lands to the A
zoning of the adjacent neighborhood helped preserve the quality of the a~
neighborhoods; residents expected that the quality would be maintained. n r 5 i
Mr. Bledsoe noted definitions in the Comprehensive Plan for "established area" and
,1` { i
"developing area." He said that the great majority of buildable land in Tigard was in
the developing areas with very little in the established areas.
Mr. Bledsoe reviewed on a map the locations of buildable and not buildable land in
Tigard and their proximity or distance from established neighborhoods. He said ,
that his proposal only affected established neighborhoods. It would have no effect
on Tigard's compliance with the Metro housing rule because the housing rule was 3
calculated on buildable land only. He said that the Council could adopt a criteria r
limiting such zoning to requests for an occasional lot classified as buildable.
Mr. Bledsoe argued that Council should adopt his proposal because it would give
greater flexibility to Council to preserve the diversity of housing in Tigard and tt
maintain the high quality of established neighborhoods. He said that this £ `d
n amendment would enable the Council to better serve the future citizens of Tigard
j with little or no cost to the rest of the city.
Councilor Moore asked if Mr. Bledsoe was asking that the property owner who C
- annexed into the city be allowed to set the zoning for his property. Mr. Bledsoe €
said that he meant property owners should have the option to request the same
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 8
h L _
A F
H7 f ~ ~ is i T I
}l~ LF
,A 9 ~ ? v.l TS`iSPazy~n°" ~ _ `e MY" rE
5 ^Y 3,{ C
C'
i
FJ $ 4 f 4 Ii
1 5 J - - - 5r, ` ~ }J
s F ~
t
i
t-
,X k
-77
~a
_ -
` - - - - - - - - -
,t -a- _ - - - -
6 a
F
t' 7 S -
F ' -
i ~ , ~fl -
m
tx , x e ~
:,,,.z r3 - Y 2
`z... 5 J - - Y
y 41
,T zoning that already existed on their street. He reiterated that the City would not i '
1~ ,F
P''~ race any Incc of housing because the houses were alreadv built; staffs concerns il
j applied only to buildable lands and his proposal was only for established ,1 ti . 7
neighborhoods.
$ t-- ~'k-, t ~Y' k i ~d j
` } Mayor Nicoli cited an example on James Road where large lots currently exist. Mr. ti
Bledsoe commented that the neighborhood itself in that area was R-3.5 and that ` Z ?8
that was the zone that should apply. _
K
Mayor Nicoli said that while he agreed with what Mc Bledsoe was trying to do in ;
maintaining established neighborhoods, he saw a difference in the way Mr. Bledsoe - t~
t was understanding the process and the way he understood the process. He said sE : ~F
1=
that he saw any piece of land that could support another housing unit as open to =
this process, regardless of whether or not it was developable land. He commented R4, i
that all over Tigard new homes were going up in established neighborhoods on the * ; ~a
larger lots. He said that he understood Mr. Bledsoe to be asking them to stop that - '"U~ , F
process which appeared to be opposite to the direction of Metro's regional planning = ~ ~ ~V we
effort.
I Mr. Bledsoe contended that there was a difference in philosophy between the z, M ,
? actual documents and what staff expressed in meetings. He said that the k 4 ,
documents stated that the Metro Housing Rule applied only to buildable land and f 4;r ~ t 1
that the computations were based solely on buildable land. J,
, 1 -g - ,
Mayor Nicoli stated that the issue Mr. Bledsoe has raised has already been brought =sue
_ up in the 2040 process and was a policy question Council was going through now: ~ 1'1 ~
F what to do with the established neighborhoods in terms of meeting Metro's housing j am ' ,
goals? , . .z ; ee~~! - 71 -1
J Nico
rtant to
thou
this. Th Mayor sa d lihe ke ceiv dl of ear that he Council was was o spot chan de the zonine -.I `1~1 - ' -
and allow the deterioration of an existing neighborhood through additional house g g £ ~ uW V
units. He added that he could not think of one example where Council, even , 60-
though the Comprehensive Plan would allow it, had done this. He said that he ~ r
f thought the Council would face stiff opposition from the residents if they tried to do ~At~ j
SO. , ~ -
~z
1 _ Mr. Bledsoe said that his proposal would give better protection for the ; - r
j neighborhoods by zoning them closer to what they actually were. He noted the ~ ° , ,
Pt push in Metro was for more houses while the expectation of residents was that their mss'
j y eighborhoods would stay the same. He said that matching the zoning would a $ i. -i ` r -
preserve that expectation. r ~ ,
-x} Councilor Rohlf asked if it was fair to prevent a property owner from redeveloping r - , V ,
z his property as he wished. Mr. Bledsoe noted that it was an issue of the rights of
the individual land owner versus the rights of the local community or neighborhood. _ - ° .
? He said that in some areas redevelopment would work but that in other areas, it
,r would be destructive. r
,;5 1 0 _ i L
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 9 r
x
y
y L r[
d'
T , s L
' 7 yT - 4 .;,.;e.`.:k° . -'.;t - ro ..!rw-+ ~ A-r r ""-a f"' i~., } ~ p E
k _ E
K 5
-
5 01
k5
, r~ . ii I ~ F~ r . . , I r I I ~ . . I . I . ~ ' ' t°` i -
v i ' _ - - to
f J
k J
: ~ .1 ~Y* ~ f- ~ I
41
- t
-
_ n ,.s 7
F^
Fia - ~ ~ . - " , , -_'.-.:~::~Z'-~.' - ~~,-Ii-~---.,.i--~',,,~~",~-,.,..~-~--~
rs
-r _ _
a j b 4 - s T t- "
Y
t. -
,n I
P 2 i 3 fSy
- -tY' `h?c FED _
fz 1 } - - rt 'J t
~t
r In response to a comment from Mayor Nicoli, Mr. Bledsoe said that the concern s
,n 1,dd was not that the Council would destabilize a neighborhood intentionally but that the 1- "b , _ -
: f y Comprehensive Plan allowed for it. He contended that the City might not be able to
prohibit a request that was detrimental to a neighborhood because the criteria "t
allowed the request. s 4`
z y
4 ;L
_ e. Staff Recommendation , -
'~.t
Mr. Valone recommended that the Council deny the proposal based on the ~x = c
r staff finding that it did not meet the criteria and that it was not beneficial to a
4 the city as a whole. r: k ~v
r -a.' h f
f. Council Questions a ~ ~ z~~ 4
Councilor Scheckla asked if there was a way to use any part of what Mr. ' t
` Bledsoe proposed. Mr. Valone said that he has spoken frequently to Mr.
Bledsoe about this proposal. He stated that he stood by his comments in the µ , 10-1
_ar
staff report. He said that he thought this proposal would be a nightmare to
implement because it was arbitrary and did not address many questions. He
also questioned what purpose the proposal would serve as property owners ~k ~ 11 `
j had the right to develop their land as they chose and request a downzone. x
s :
He stated that he was not sure this proposal would fix anything and that it' _ r
s would be a complex law. 4I
. -
fv
In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Ms. Beery said that she "w y
concurred with staffs analysis. She said that the only legal constraint right , - 1 ,
now was the agreement with Washington County which would require A ' ~ ; ~ p
amendment should this be adopted. - y~
g. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing. - Sys k `
11 py 4.cTy ~J $
h. Council Consideration t_, r
F x ~ c'"
Councilor Rohlf commented that he saw a concern from the residents in
Walnut Island whose land would soon be annexed and who wanted to
i protect their neighborhoods from the kind of development that they observed " ,
in Tigard. He said that he thought the amendment was relatively innocuous ' g ~
rk because it gave the Council an option in making the decision; however, it [,~'~,:T,.,,~
~ f >
seemed fatally flawed for enforcement and interpretation. He said that he " : I
would send it back for reworking with respect to the definitions so that it ' ~ E
would be enforceable, if they chose to move forward with it.=,;a F
, s
- - k_ $ aM lp
, Councilor Moore stated that he concurred with staff. He said that he saw ~
this as setting up zoning for one group of people.
-
Councilor Hunt said that he also supported staff. He said that after reading " ` t
` ti the staff report, he thought that any annexation could become controversial E r
based on the zoning. e r
. r,e
;
I
a f
r TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 10 Y
e F -4~
t' - i"
.4 Y S l lam'(,-1iL o- } ,
F
, b
X
.....W xvyq T - 2x--,,f. 4,-_-" k t _ f
f S } f r' f
7 ti - 1v _ _ - r~'r} G r
}z a x
y V - f $ M1
Y F J' J _ 3 t5 t
f11I r i
i
- L_
- _ t _
1P y - 2 P 4t
t -51f
-
J - a - - -
y
- - - - - 4 t1.y
F
N-
r , E ~ - - a ~ , _ , { P - '7 " s x
_ `
Z x
W fMF
' o14Yr3f..x;Y -.5
F t
- 2 - t T
- Councilor Scheckla said that while he thought Mr. Bledsoe had brought up a r
* , good point, he feared it might trigger a domino effect if used throughout the
r whole city. He said that he could go either way but would probably vote to
;,r deny the amendment. :y - .
t ,
Mayor Nicoli said that while he agreed with what Mr. Bledsoe was trying to ;
t do, he perceived a problem with how Mr. Bledsoe was trying to do it. He
a x reiterated that he was not aware of any developed area in which the City has x " uw4 R,
destroyed its integrity as a neighborhood. He said that if he saw such an ~ - -
indication, he would probably vote differently but that he did not and. i
therefore, he could not support the amendment. He said that he supported ~ e_
Mr. Bledsoe's concern to protect the neighborhoods and that he thought it ; , z} -
was shared by the Council and the Planning Commission.
}t 7 iii s...
j Councilor Rohlf commented that developing areas iike'vValnut Island in a ! sue,
piece meal fashion led to an unattractive hodgepodge that led to further l _ v
problems, especially with the transportation network (which was best viewed e s ; ' <
on a global scale). , ~ ,W _
E' tE =rip Ye &
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Moore, to direct staff .
r:
to come back with a resolution denying the application. - i
E-, li~ 3E
Motion was approved by majority voice vote of Council resent. ~ T,'
ti P (Mayor F•'? a
r
I z` s 1
1 Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, and Scheckla voted "yes"; Councilor Rohlf
abstained.) ~ y ~
-I N 9
7 ; x ,t Z
I Mayor Nicoli recessed the meeting for a 10 minute break. 'l',` N'2
Nil,
Mayor Nicoli reconvened the meetin -,A`7 i
7. NON AGENDA ITEMS . = z ~ {Y ,
> ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE z`- r~ v
j REGARDING PAYMENT OF A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT t Y V;,"~ E~ _ 5
IN INSTALLMENTS -ORDINANCE NO. 96-26~{
,r
, f'a -
I Mr. Monahan presented the staff report. R , . ' ,
i,? f P- r
Mayor Nicoli stated that if the underlying verbal understanding that the City had with " ~ r ~ * V
" vi the participants in the Dartmouth LID negotiations was not followed through, he - I 1.
T would recall the ordinance and vote to reverse it. He said that right now he thought ` , .
r ,
that this was the best chance to resolve the problems in the Triangle. [ '
k fie, f
Councilor Hunt explained that he opposed the ordinance for reasons of r
consistency. He pointed out that they denied the previous agenda item because itx ~ _
was treating one group of people differently than the rest; this ordinance was _
written specifically for Mr. Martin and was treating him differently than anyone else.
-1 I
He commented that Mr. Martin has used the farm deferral for his personal benefit to kT
t ~ ° TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 11
5z '
T ,
K
?D
'r' i' 1 rs-- - _ a 1
~ , ,~t E', . 1 , . . 1, - I I ,"r I - - : - ~ ~ I , I , I - " ~
:2r ~L , { - - r"t k
.✓t k 1 f - d ,r
_ i, - - _ _ 4 '1
f.4 ~ 5 m
L t j
a
- - ?y +
r
"a 4x d 4 t ~ - - ~ ~Y
k
- T - - .....wauy..:~ - .teinsr.c.en.....- - .:.-.aY.......m..`.......-..._v-~~_..a......~-.m.._.......s -
V`A
F fi » ? v
t
~ 4 Y
rt letting him go the other way because
could not not s o a.,,,r,.
lower his taxes and that the - .
' it was now to his advantage to do so.
Councilor Rohlf said that he did not have a problem with Mr. Martin using a farm
deferral or asking Council to make this change because he had a legal right to do `
so. He said that his concern was the amount of litigation on this Dartmouth LID at fi w}_
the behest of a couple of the participants to the detriment of everyone, and the ? r
possibility of the City giving up a bargaining chip. He said that he would change his
vote on the issue because of the oral commitments made by the City`
representatives on the Council's behalf. He stated that whether or not those b
comments were misguided, they were made and the City had to live up to its word.
Councilor Moore asked if this proposal would benefit any properties in the future.
Mr. Monahan said that it would be possible and referred to the Sattler property
which is in farm deferral and, potentially, could also benefit if an LID were formed in
~t a gi Asa a ; k -t
that area.
The Council discussed the length of time needed by staff to resolve the issues prior
to this ordinance taking effect. Ms. Beery pointed out that the ordinance as Yf -
currently drafted included an emergency clause that could be deleted as part of the -
s Council's action. Mayor Nicoli suggested that an effective date should be placed in `x
i
} c e
the ordinance. Ms. Beery concurred, stating that that would be more workable from
` an administrative standpoint.3
Councilor Moore asked if Section 3 helped to speed up the process. Ms. Beery
said that that was the intent and that it provided the Finance Director with the n 3
authority to accept an application sooner. Mr. Monahan commented that Section 3t ; r a
wasn't necessary at this point because staff couldn't do a new assessment prior toy -
the expiration of the 30 days anyway; he recommended deleting Section 3." `
Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Mayor Nicoll, to approve Ordinance
96-26 with the deletion of Section 3.
The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance.}
ORDINANCE NO. 96-26, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARD MUNICIPAL 'I >g E
CODE CHAPTER 13.04 REGARDING PAYMENT OF A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT ASSESSMENT IN INSTALLMENTS d
Motion was approved by a majority roll call vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli,
Councilors Moore and Rohlf voted "yes"; Councilors Hunt and Scheckla voted "no.") r 5 f'y a~
Mayor Nicoli moved the meeting into a study session format at 9:55 p.m.
8. STUDY SESSION I
t ,
> City Space Needs
` Mr. Monahan presented an update on the Amber Foods property. He said that the ;
purchaser understood that the City was not ready at this time to be a tenant; also
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 12 Z
t x
a
~ 1
147
ry
t t
J ~ d
t
s.~~...e~_..~.~ i__~_L ...._r _.11 ~_:}3t,.__f._ F. ._v _~..r.._-.,._.__., u r__,__ti•_ ~r_~_~ i.._
. _
A _-I - . .
.a> -
r,
- , ~ , , ~ , - - I . ~ I . ~ - . - , ~ - ~ . 1, ~ - ~ ~ " - - ~ - ; I . I
< 4
i'£
~N~t ,
r
r..,-
F _ t
a~
M t v
n _ t3
, €r1
F r the purchaser no longer believed that he could get a buyout clause favorable to the M
i,n City. He stated that the City still had the option to purchase the building. 11
? - _ -l b-
Liz Newton, Assistant to the City Ada i11Estrator, presented the staff report. She - > ; >
-1- noted the parking problem that would occur if the library stayed on site; Tigard F --t-f 'o- .
Christian Church across the street was willing to allow City employees to park in h .,o5,a
their lot during the day.
4 & F `E - `'S "
Ms. Newton reviewed the square footage of the existing facilities by department. ~ zk
t She noted what building portions were not included in the square footage L~ 4M, f
calculations. She pointed out on a map the location of different facilities, noting F ,
which properties the city owned or didn't own. _ }
A Ms. Newton reviewed the 20 year space needs by department. L F
r . !V' rv ri y >y
a
a
w ["~`~i, - - - Y{ `i %"`~G
In response to a question from Councilor Hunt, Mr. Monahan noted that the
Canterbury site was not included because, according to Ms. Newton's calculations, r - .
they did not need it; however it could be used for limited office space. ft ~ ~ ~ ~ p " 4
V; f# g M r
Ms. Newton explained the situation with the Precision Graphics building. Since the y,a R
fire, the owner, Mrs. Schramm, has expressed interest in talking with the City about ~1 w
- 4 F4. L - T
purchasing the building, either as is or after she renovated it. t : 3~ 3 '3 ~ 1 r-11
z %xsW -
- - ; Ms. Newton presented a proposal she developed to address the long term 20 year
space needs, the interim space needs, and the immediate space needs. The n a
h proposal included: e
r 1 - Purchase of the Precision Graphics building for Community Development ~ -
and Engineering; ,fr
Move the Engineering modular unit to Public Works for use as storage; { x r - 4
Redo that location for parking for the police fleet; , it, '
Move library staff into the part of City Hall vacated by Community ` X«, ~ t
Development; , * x , r '
The library would use the freed up space in the library for children's' i _
< programs; r 7 Mr` ~ ~ -
Purchase the house on Ash Street with the WCCLS bond money (should it , t
pass); 9?
r - Build a new library on the Public Works site and remove the TCYS building; tF W '
rr
r r, - Move the Finance Department from the Water Building to City Hall where the - ;
library staff had been; k 3 - y k a -
- Move Public Works into the Water Building; §,fi %,.5,4,>~ i - r" t
- Renovate the library for office space for Administration, including some w~ ,1 ' g ;
Vr community meeting rooms; - l
r - Move the people from the Niche and City Hall into the new office space; - s
N,. Expand police into the vacated portion of City Hall;
a;
- Make the Niche a community center or parking lot. _ L l~ -i t
Mr. Monahan commented that right now the City could only get the Amber Foods 4
u >4Y property by buying it outright and they didn't have the money to do that right now; w xs
however they did have the money to buy the Precision Graphics building. ` 3 ' y
t~ f f i .j 4 'I , S 3
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JULY 23, 1996 -PAGE 13
k -y S,t ,
° r +"u~ a a : r,Ya .,y a s . z. ~ } ~ f
T
O ~ ~
- , - - .r -
i
~ t?~,',-,7X i~14-,*.-,~Y~.-.', r - 11 IL I - - - ~ . o I I . I , , ~ ~ , : ~ - - ~ - 7'r-1; e~ ~ f -1- L . , ~ - " { d
r
r} Y t 1 _ 4 F~ -3
x
,,Y~ -f',c4 - - P
E L;: ~ : 7 - , : ~ ~ - " F",_ ~ , _ j _1
1
♦...r~..~_~~ .~r.~ - _~..e , u.. _i._ v._~ _~..r 3 _.t._ -".~-~.'_{.J _r....,., _c_.y. . •21. i. 1. ..i .v
_ -
N.
y
£ }
Y
'Y i - 4 - -
A
,17~1 -Y
-fa ''3, 1.ks'v. - - - .,.tetl~°+.a-.".-t9s...> ~.v_.W_~..- - __,_-_-----...-~....,......".._s, -I G. k
ra m t _ - + e
r +
s,
V l"r
R ~
d
12 N t , Ms. Newton stated that staff felt that the Precision Graphic building property could
accommodate the needed parking. She noted that the building could be renovated ~ , -
to two stories. , c
Councilor Hunt suggested moving one or more of the Public Works buildings to the w T ~
Canterbury site. Mr. Monahan no that the Canterbury site was zoned N
residential. He said that he thought that the neighbors would oppose any use other
than limited office. 0 ~
Ms. Newton commented that if the City purchased the house on Ash and used the ~ s ,
11" -
Interfaith Outreach Services site to build the library, they would meet the ~ P
11
landscaping requirements and provide 179 parking spaces for the library. She said r
- that 110s Davis (~w 1 :'__--iaiy .
a~~ Director) Thought that the site had potential for a new library. F y _ x
F, _11 - ~-,~-~,,,,~--~,,,~.'~~-.,~~,,,~-i~',.~,,--', , , .I- -il,
C Councilor Hunt commented that the City could vacate much of Ash Street, since it 5 ~w A
existed only on paper, and get more land there. °
a
Ms. Newton commented that the parking at the proposed library site could also be x~I i
used by users of Fanno Creek, if the City fixed that area up according to the Fanno ~z
f ,~,l~
Creek Park plan. r t K ZF -
Ms. Newton reported Mc Wegner's comments regarding using the Water Buildings` -~f -A 11
for Public Works: he would like to continue to use the Canterbury site for storage of
gravel and other heavy items because it was more centrally located, and they -
l would probably not be able to park all employees cars behind the wall and would + "r , ` }
need some of the front 64 parking spaces for employees. ~
1 iDO
~ 11
In response to a question from Councilor Hunk, Ms. Newton stated that the s k t
calculations did include storage space. i
s: sW,% t 1
Mayor Nicoli stated that he was more concerned about the additional square -
footage needed then in how the buildings would be used. He noted that theme
Precision Graphics building could be easily converted into office space. He asked if
they could purchase the building over time. ,N , ' E
F
Mr. Monahan said that staff was looking for answers to similar questions. He € R j
commented that a payment over time might be beneficial to Mrs. Schramm as it
- , , - -i _F - ~ -
t would be similar to the monthly rent she has been receiving. He spoke for the r < :
proposal, pointing out how it addressed immediate and long term needs, even
without knowing if or when the library levy would happen. He said that while he
liked the Amber Food property, he didn't like the idea of children walking across the k u ~
street from the parking lot. s c
Councilor Hunt commented that he had opposed expanding the library because the c
f parking problems would simply increase in that event. He said that this proposal
x alleviated one of his greatest concerns.
-Y t - x -
`F" Y
Councilor Moore asked how comfortable staff was with the 20 year projections. Mr.
f Monahan said that he was not comfortable with the Public Works projections c
t -
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 14 ' _ ,
n t
y
~ i
7y f' - - - - - - E _
' E -
S -?l ~ E
z } - ra
a j i- r _ .
1'~~ ~ - . - _~r,!_. _ - - , . . , : , , - ~ I I , , , I I - ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ , , . : ~ , - - J ; ;~,--,~~r,~-_ -1~,~,~~.j% _ _ "
, . ~ _ " , , Ili . - - . . , ~ - , , , I _ ~ - ~ ~ 1 ~ " ~ ~";r_ , r I ~ . - - , , -
5 G
-
a F
I ~ e~~, , " , - , : I . . - I r ~ ~ . - ~ ~ - r- . ~ I r I . . I I I I ~ . I f , - - L , r _ - _ - I I , ~ _ - , , I
~,i ..i .G...3~ i. _.tiS u_ __cs Ti_ _._nr c.v.......... _ _'T. i.. 1.~L d. _r L
1 , T~ ~ _ a.~--
- - - - - _
S
! ~ FIN - , - , - - , , . , - - 2 - _ , - , I
r
x,+-5'` 'Ei '£!s f t......S..b^f u...- .......i....._...._e....w.r..._ - 'S i-f -
SaL M" 4 G V, 1 fk S
t
r_ ~ ,
11 because they didn't consider do Public Works in the analysis. Ms. Newton added ~ 1
11
that she also would need to analyze the police projections again, 11 ;1
o s ~ -t
Mr. Monahan reviewed the financing situation. The Finance Director will need time .
7 to review. More information will needed from Mrs. Schramm; that is, does she want f
to proceed with a sale of the property? In addition Mr. Monahan indicated3
x, ,~•.:•7 , _ concerns about the WCCLS levy because it was now estimated at $37 million. An n _
additional concern is the "cut and cap" measure on the November 5, 1996, ballot. ~ xx ~ g
-axi~
In response to a comment from Councilor Hunt, Mr. Monahan clarified the issue x
v~ ^th ± $100 ,000 from the sale of the buildin on Main. He said that the record 3r°
^s rr, rate- mongn nnn fir.-c_a~....t s , - _ ' I -
I .1 Z ihGy ii~ciiiucd ii 85 pair oI Inc vwv,vw w u is N. , F- iii- -
k showed I
expansion. Council needed either to allocate the funds to the police department I M"Va £ ~ -
expansion or the City must designate those funds from somewhere else. Gtza'
~~,x
Mayor Nicoli suggested using the contingency fund for purchase of the Precision'
Graphics Building. He asked staff to talk with Mrs. Schramm about terms and t ~ ;
obtain an evaluation of the building's worth. Y ` _
The Council discussed purchasing the Precision Graphics building. Councilor Hunt r$
supported purchasing it prior to renovation. Y
11
Mr. Monahan said that they would look at the Ash property also. He stated that he t x '
wanted the Executive staff to review Liz' proposal to make sure that there weren't , -V b k
any loose ends. He noted that it would have to go to the Water Board as well with g, , 5,
- this proposal.
1 s
4 t In response to a comment from Councilor Hunt, Mr. Monahan said that it would be x ,W+ , -
good to get the Budget Committee involved as well. , ~ ~
i - ~
t - i 9. ADJOURNMENT: 10:38 p.m. 4 K k
_ I _ M -
~ { _i
- , LP ~ a_ml,,~ kle ~,,++~-'i~;',',T="~ ,
' Attest: Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder ~ f
E~ ~ r
~ -~,~Ze_ - _~L~
re. City of Tigard r{
-11 I
L' -9
~ttS~ a7. 19~Cc x t
9~i
1 [ a - -,i
a f
- r i:ladmkccrn1960723.doc { ,
4 t 44 {
Z 11 d^, .5 M xJ
f
_s s'tt i
r L
- 3 - ~ i
- 4r I TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 - PAGE 15 x {
q r
F 3 42aSs_ i„Y°sP i
r j _ 6d a '^^m... rmu.~_.3 .sc, ° - ,T;~A4 ..~,,.Y«. a-s _ _ ...,.-,c .y„ ',7' -r` - 4'~s sx'kr3L- - i
z
iy
_ _ E
Y 4 - l t k~.:: -
rii" E' h - t P fi !
Sv'4 " `
U-
Jab # 11 { f )G t y~
1
y ~-A J { ~
r
E - , - . ~ , . ~ . , ~L + . , ' ~ r . . 1. ~ . . , . . ~ ~ . L r , ~ - L" , - - , ~ - - ' ~ ~ - I ~
C.7 ltt
r
...t i_.._. _ ..,.._._.~4
t
15
gyM
b
NO-
Eli
4..,, `
0 'A
ME!
m -7
.'h-{P .s TM-fu"~i 3 ^s'- 4d z+' s s , t - F-'z k yd
-M oil.
10 A;0,
1 -0 -1 Iffn
■NITY AIEWSP ~ ~ Syr
{t p_PERS. INC.
COMM tJ ld1 1 Ir6. ••v. L°oa
Notice TT B56`! a e
5M
io, + - P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360
t'A
V E r. BEAVERTON. OREGON 97075
1Cty
F 2 Legal Notice Advertising , ~rfi y
" n
• 3
E3 Tearsheet Notice
_ } ' . % • CITY' a7rrdT)CRkI +
City of Tiga'
3125 SW Hall Blvd. • -
❑ Duplicate Affidavit pLvg€
s Tigard,Oregon 97223-81109
- t a y,.. a o ~ss~ Vie'-~.
L ax Accounts Payable-Terry '
a
~P 10
R-$ s AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION k °n
z STATE OF OREGON, )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON,
)8s' \rys~5 Will Kathy Snyder s -?"q5 )Ns F being first duly sworn, depose and say hat I am the Advertising rb ,1? Y`
_K R4 1
Director, or his principal clerk, of the ,1 qa rd-mna 7 a r i n mimes
Xs a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010~#r Six
$ I and 193.020; published ar mTgar~l in the s
r - afgresaid county and state; that the'
C1tV CounCiI n cc S ting ~t-f~ t~M1 }
r r`rr t}r~fi L~F _
° - a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in then
successive and.`'`
f~ az u e , , entire issue of said newspaper for ONE
consecutive in the following issues: N~
July 18 1996
4~ A:
M 3 i f - jy .3 F - s E t
'PQ
y£-a i
4-h- A- f
Subscribed and sworn to o me this y ,19
OFFICIAL SEAL
rt a
ROBIN A. BURGESS 5~ r E
4 c 1 - NOTAR ^ L1C -OREGON x
lu~
a 3 Notary P c for Oregon CO)AM :0.024552~~ E
t # r~ ~t my C - SSiOi E- AdMAY16,1997
x My Commission Expires:, x =
.ig
a*ra AFFIDAVIT
'V i - Z thyy x T f'i
fyW X~
FF l - y v vµ
Mal rz, W",
t tom, a~ ~E
k i':2.'yr e. g
;s < rte ,
WRO
t §t r_ rC.aR""FY;k
- _
a
r
4. r
~ I , ~ I ~ ~ ~ - -I ~ ~ I ~ - . . - , - , , -1 - ]
a 9~ f ti _ _
Y E' RD _
S
"~1n
J { ,e - - .".._.>o,v.w✓awa..w.ti..._--.e..e.V......- .e _ -..11_,-..___.__._....__ _~~.....iv. y _ kq
} 4 3 -
r =t 1 ,
ry
, I.
c
1
- "
t
The following meeting pighllgh(s ate published for your information. Full p "f
agendas may be obtained front the City Recorder, 13125 S.W. Hall . r
Boulevard. Tigard. Ocegoa 97223: or by calling 639 4171. -
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING,. , r ,
jf TIGARD CITY HALL-TOWN HALL
AI~L oWvy:on~mlrssn OREGON.
13127 S.' 19. ii 3...my .T..
v
Study Meng 4Red Rock Creek Room) (6:30 P.M.)fi r
• Executive Session: The Tigard City Council may go into ' , r . ` , ,
Executive Session under thc`pmvisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d),
(e). & (h) to discuss labor relations. real property transactions. ~g F
i current and pending fitigatton issues rr A
• Agenda Review 5 e
Business Meeting (7bwn Hall) (730 P.M) ' ^ j " ~ -
d11 - i as
i Pubhc Hearings r a
1 -
1 (Quasi-Jndiual IJearing)'-,COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: r + 'r ti
AMENDMENT (CPA) 96.0004/ZONE CHANGE (ZON)-,
i i - 96.00031PLANNED- DEVELOPMENT. (PD) 96.0002 ` `
SATTLER SITE. REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive f LL - jf I;.
Plan map, and zoning map on 27 S acres located on three - "
pprcgis west of S.W Hall _lioulevard and South of S.W Saaler- = ` I ? a ~ r U Y
I Y`•'-~ - - _ k F i'ce'
k:i'
•_..(Leglsiative Hearing) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;`.. f x x` r F
AMENDMENT(CPA)96.0001BLEDSOE-REQUEST, "
Amend the text of the,Urbanization section of the' L r ~ I
Comprehensive Plan by adding a new policy as follows 10.1.4 s ~ ~
An exception to Policy 10.1.3 is that the city may assign
zoniag'closeatio existing development in low density , „per ~-11 a
iesldential established areas LOCATION Cvywide 11 , 1
Council Consrderanon -t-~~~
f ~
' Undergroundrog Utilities Ordinance -Amending Chapter' ~ ~ a `;"ter c
18.764 of the Tigard Municipal Code 1
T0569 Publish July 18;1996 ` a F -
- _ ,-°,a i~ z
Y k
3 ,J
, .
v
tv
y
3
{
y
- 'tJ-
i
a
r-
i
s
- - :
_ _
t - - - -
}
t Y- - - - - _ t
C
K
L i
t
- - -
- -
a
tr -•--'..f-Tr ~,,,T..r'~.~.y,.•,ms_.. ~....~.+.--.-~.^--rte .
t, y.m _ .w.. r_ ._.y~"~.__ _.-7`. __.._i~ .1 S__..._ a_ r.1
- -
r
I T I - ~F'M ~ , , 5- ~ -Q
N
-W ~ ~"5 3 JJr P1.4 ; _ A 54 p 5x. f 5"` . 9~ `$11" I i'h e4,
a.+- 1 " `.'s` t •c - - e i x S, _ _ K - r 1 x5 rz -e tiYg
_ ~
~r 'Y ,S, .P ,ya xr s° _ L t y , k vuz x51-~
' W Y ,g "~g - _ 4 t r y
rsty32a$, YFm «"'°"1 :C - 4 Y _ F P. \ k €A lyY 1yi+u"+Y,Y `i',i s'~ - _
111 , I s x 5
t q' , '
11 ~ { a E F'- ' .fir
I £ w
,.,:eaY: :-_,,.rtu wy,_t, -:,y i _ ,`Y "~!.s,r,._;.:.9
~z. err "fr4 3
,~„st-l~~ °:r ; fk COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. L.1.1 1 ,T. r
Lt a° 5°~ y -'_~E P.O. BOX 370 PHONE 503 684-0360 Notice TT 8564 , ' ` , y~
' BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 ua*h:.3?a~aF 11,
` f Legal Notice Advertising 1
}
11- , F
'j. N 11,
_ - x l _ 1*ity of Tigard • E3 Tearsheet Notice
~s1
a
r ; 13125 SW Hall Blvd.
7 fii ard,Ore on 97223-8109 ❑ Duplicate Affidavit 3 ,
i r
Accounts Payable •
2 - i ~4Tyaa 5 5§
-
a ` f u ) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ,="A -a-4'~ & 1 I` x
i
a x STATE OF OREGON, )ss 1f `a
s a- k - .L~ q ,..z x
, s F r COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) M~ i
,?r'ya' T~ - f f,- hV d r 4F ;a a pq - r , -
r y - being first duly sworn, depose and saY that 1 am thQ Adverhsmg ~,;~~r y
Director, or his principal clerk, of th~I_4ard Tualatin Times '0 '0 t+
a k a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.0105rfi~ 4
s and 193.020; published at Tic3ard in the P tiya
aforesQid county and state that the 0004 Settle Site I. e
Public Hearing-C13A 96-r -
F _ L
- , a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the n o f z
- > entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and -
consecutive in the following issues:
. I
a z n I , r I
i - July 11 1996 a -
:m y
, 3 t l
r- . a ti
OFFICIAL SEAL" ' -
s ` Subscribed and sworn to a re me this Y119 -I I
g Frri2' ROBIN A. SURCESS - K
0
r S NOTA "i.1r -OREGON n. 1 t}£ x x
' ~ r r Notary Pu i for Oregon COMRi 0. 024552 - i ~ t
- r~w-s _ P Z7 PYyC ,310'; EA :AjSMAY 11. 1191 a r < ,f7 €
'ffi ' ° G v f My Commission Expires: - d`r "z ~ M -
_ 'z`'r;r;z AFFIDAVIT _?s i -
< , .s z' - -k ~s is °c
' R r - I _
,v~ },,S art'' - ~~j` T ,1
°}°'e .d'w Fps a' v 3-,TZV s r, FFF 71, - ja
_ i
NLZ xr rFy ri -
i {
s
I t ,,~,.,z,-, , ; ~ -"L - ~ I "I , ,
#t. d,}*r4 +r _ - r r x- - ice' '3~ .cT',-z,
r ki a s r r 3,, - rx ,
} r~
6 4,
.11
A - rnS Z -3 dl - k% a1 c'>p F
r r i
a.+-,~-*- rte- ~r-:r- .-r`'~r t
- -
- a, s y, , 1 z s
,
r -
e®
- } -~.,._..k.r..:_: s n_= .-w..„5 :eX-.:.+«.,...„u.-w...... . - - . v..l .u. .....__-_r.__. _-._-.~.».w
The following will be considered by the Tigard City Council
on July 23.
1996, at 7:30 P.M.. at the Tigard Civic Center-Town Hall, 13125 S.W. Cl
Hall Boulevard, Tigard Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is
invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance
with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and rules
and procedures of the City Council. Failure to raise an issue to person or
by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing on the request or
fatiure to provide statements or evidence sufficient to afford the
j decisionmaker an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to the close of
i the hearing on the request, precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of
i Appeals based on that issue. Further information may be obtained from ,
4 the Planning Division at 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.. Tigard, Oregon 97223. or
i / by calling (503) 639-4171. ski
PUBLIC HReunaGe-,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-00041 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 96-000
r j
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) 96.0002 `
SATTLER SITE s
REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map and zoning map on
27.5 acres located on three parcels west of S.W. Hall Boulevard and south
1 of S.W. Sauter Street. The application seeks to change the eastern 8.5
acres, along Hall Blvd., from Medium Density Residential/R-12 to .
{ Medium Density Residential/R-7• and to change the western 19 acres
from Low Density Residential/R-4.5 to Medium Density Residendal/R-7. -
LOCATION: West of Hall Boulevard and south of Sattler Street.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies N
3.1.2(2), 2.1.1, 6.1.1.8.1.1 and 12.2.1(2); ZONE: R-4.5 (Single-Family-
1 Residential) allows single-family detached units, manufactured homes, a
farming family day care and conditional uses such as single-familyy
attached units, duplex units; religious assembly and schools. R=12 {
(Multiple=Family Residential) allows single-family detached and attached
units, duplex units, multiple-family units, residential care facilities, mobile
home parks and subdivisions, public support and family day care services
and conditional uses such as community recreation, religious assembly,
schools, hospitals and residential care facilities. <
t
I
I ! II' ~ I
TP8564 -Publish July 11, 1996. t
i
~n
_
_ . . . . _ .
1 »,,.1 tea, r s__ 3.' E v ova
s?''tzn a,~°rt -R~ p'3' .ya' iYL x 2 i s _ d { _ ~t S`: _y .-x_,;2y 4
- 11
ARNNIM :S;t ' a:-~ ;_~a ~Y- s ~ yi tf, ° t y+ :g't-i;~ +'"-+kr
~99$s.' <'ffk. w )~n - 3 _ d 'SK tk F + ~Y#v^~ 3
3F 1- - ? r - ~ ~i e t a'a Mx ; a 5 z OSC. Tat 12 tvb1.` ` -Ea,E.e-~z*~txti'. e-, t '"as- L ~'r n -*~t~4z• a..w,; i M~W 6 h sir
six 3x - - ~4 .,w>< .
4 , i x
~ s~ W , 1-1
qi I'M
c 4 - emu ' - . " -q..'~fZc' ^4X. - ,5M
, It
j/ t a rx f r wzM. ,
11 2 a
ax - -
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal .
a Y'} yk n. t •z' r a
t
- i - 1 P.O.BOX370 PHONE (503)684-0360 NOUCa TT 8563 ra t--,. ~
s - ' - 't SEAYER.ON, OREGON ^.7075 `.1 ~.,y
2"Legal Notice Advertising t #4ee t ~
.v`t'"..te st _ t~-. t 7.~ 11
yT #vs •City of Tigard : 13 TearsheetNotice
z" t (1~,3125 SW Hall Blvd. ❑
1'iQard,OrP- nn 97 Duplicate Affidavit
-11 v223-8108
4 a • n`, i-. rays.. p''~sc.+-h.t'a-
t ' •Attn:Accounts Payable y
4 •117 , }
" 1
5 r AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION c t1 it ~ -11 *r 11 . z e STATE OF OREGON. )ss. ^n"- "rl 1 ~ 1,~, # x k a
_ COUNTY OF WASHINGTON,) j" .
r , s { I Kathy Snyder _ ~ ~ a
k
being first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Advertising ° w.; 11-0 ;v_ Director, or his principal clerk, of theTi! -Tna 1 ar; n mimes L
1 a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 ' S I 44
' 1 ¢ r and 193.020; published at in the S
r t ` foresaid county end state; that the Tigard °ioa `ublic Hearinq pA aF-nnpl Bledsoe ?u mss:
' a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the v?,sV
EV j entire issue of said newspaper for nNF successive and n*`-
~ ' consecutive in the following Issues: x.#
G F_ a i, July 11,1996 y
r
x _ j, ~
-s
y
R Subscribed and sworn "U e me this 1 i-h fin" of ,199 r.xa~l,
'r , , ; `mot:,; R06I,y♦A(ARl3PGESS s~" _ C _
+ try NotaryIic for Oregon NOTAti iC. -OREGON s z 6`a 4 _
X , COMm 0.024552 24 r t`
'a $ My Commission Expires- 1•i'0 , ' : S[00 EA !RES W 18,199' 2, l
~,sa „ AFFIDAVIT _
A- Fa~ ~M~a-" s
'QAWN11-4 111108 ,.I,
a":-n";,_Ea _ e>,«p~e^+xsu ~x,`f 4'r1-ra,a
.,y Ur ri;,~ _-~r. T.&-: r•:',3-~`.~` q =-c',,., ~°r.^<~. _ ..~s a..~^
=iP'3; ~ `.,f ,''.;~,s`.i .t`* u'~ 2- wrt~i- .,t s - „-r Irv, 4$''-
NRQ°6 rc
.
r t
, 2 r
~y-a~- as L c zr -x{ v L µ~.ks 2yf~`t,°. i -
_i r - i't
, 3111i_ I`, '11, - Np-',',~ ~f ~ ~ _1~
x-
-ti i ?f' f
' Xj has ` v 1 r - ~~E r. o-y r dry
_ y - rr
t.4__ ,s,..-,.,.,fir ~~b _ .r__: ~i.' N ~ t. ,_s_._ .-o.. r,. . _ i._i .
i u_.
~~.k-.,-- a
s - . - -
~F°r " rS
K
Id .5 ,F J F S
~ -
I - _ rlSs
,jj , sera -~~::.aa.::.s.we».,.:,.:.....o. ..n«,.,.,.,-, . d_.._-..V.. a~....d......,_...~..,.....~...,.,~...-_._-. .-.I'-.-,,-
_ .,r
~2 1, 41 t~
i.s~ it '4-, li. ( 4 ~1'{
r _ i-. a E { a- -
r
-t 5,• ~ . - i t - - 2.,._
"
2 i " K - is r
4
l S _ e ' 3 kS
11
- t °r j , t _
--tY } I i Il
4
t
j bi
II
J'
I
-
The following will be considered by the Tigard Ciry Council on Jul~v 23, t
_ _ . 1494; at 7!3n "-;attheTigard C&t l` 12 _T .w[ rrrt/ 131?,c - - - "
, Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Both public oral and written testimony ; ~ - ,
, 2; ,,~-tj - - , ~3
is invited The public hearing on this mater will be conducted in atxor- ( , c `
dance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and - € _
rules and procedures of the City Council Failure to raise an issue in per. ~ ~ z~
son or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing on tha m- ' t~ 3
quast or failure to provide statements or evidence sufficient to afford the . t- - g s K x
ecisionmaker an opportumityto respond to the issue prior to the close of.
the hearing on the request precludes an'appeai to the Land Use Board of i s F 5
Appeals based on that issue. Further information may be obtained from #
i the Planningg Division al 13125'S.W. Hall Blvd.. Tigard; Oregon 97223 or
by calling 639.41~I.. i 5 ~
PUBLIC HEARINGS: , `j a F
ti S t ac`s
} COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-0001 i - 5 ,
HLEDSOE., t . qy
$,EtbUEST:Atpepdjlue text of ttjgJJrbanization Section of the Com 1. S 4~A ,l
prehensivo,P2an tiyadding anew, policy as follows: 20.1 4 An exception to.Poticy,l0.I.3, is that the city, may assign koning closest to existin . - i c `x F~ "'wa `
" development in low density residential established areas. g _ - s~R,'r, a,4
LOCATION: Citywide. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA i. ` - e - `
Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10 and 14; Tigard Comprehensive Plan ~
w,
policies 4.1.1; 2.1.1 and 6,1.1; Tigard Community Development Code Y 4
ZONE N/A and Oregon Administrative Rule Chapter 660 Division 12 - AN f
ti
T"8563-Pub, - , Suly 12,1596. '
~.F S ~ ~ E 11 ` r €
_ a - s r 3' ~a3
i ! 1#"`J1'H Y Y
~i t s
t~
_ L~} yaa$
b L i k at `fit }}r~
s
S,1- - S ? t -
} - k ,rv ,7- t, ' _
S
r °
1 S 5A' 4
~ ~ " ` ~ ~ ' " F:" -~'--L- - . , - ' [ ~ , ,
E CJ
'j
f
{ S l- 3
i X
it
£J,i - `Y- - ~ fr C .
i p - a d d' i(
.
4
n { ~w_r m -nxsp✓^ - t '~i,J -r:~. f r 't^ t -f -
s
- :i - - YI
i j - - - `s a5 x.
R511 i~,'t ~ - ,-~%"z L" ,7':~ v , , ~ , ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1, -1 - - - -1 I ~ 7 F . . , ~ -,Y-
- r
-
r
fF I - - - - kS Z r -t j
d
3 E C 4
- y ¢i
f
{
- - - - - 772
_ - - -
f F -S t- - - -
e '.t,(sj s C3, - x a ~ 'fir
rift z z- ,,~.-z xe - F~ 4z z
11
S s x r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ~ k ~.-~t
F A _ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING g _
s
P In the Matter of the Proposed
m<
-3 .t.I` b E di tiS`,u'~Y S 4 {f,u,Q _
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss. k a 'ss
5? .s,_-:~ C:fv of T; -1 )
11 Y _
nz'
I, begin first duly sworn, on oath, ` ~5 ~ ~ ~R
5
~';17"~~A"~',4~ ~.j AM 1A _ , t 3 depose and y:
, t 8
That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance ~
i Number (s) - a-1 (a ~ ,,suex~,I . 1-1 ~ ,
4 which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated 3 copy(s) ~~y~-~
of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by r ference made a part hereof, on the _ z~Wl V ; 7
day of Rt1~Jl , 19ab s x eft
(D rl ra 3 _ _ h" rj
' 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 3 #
yam- r ~ . w -
2. Tigard Library, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon ~g F
t t 3. Tigard Water Department, 8777 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon p~"
i ~ "a 1
"
- 1~ ~ t, I ,
`4--~,"- 11-1 -&U' -:;<'R ' E -1
lr' QC'_ ~ i ~ ,;i ~'r~
Subscribed and sworn to be;ore me this _Jday of s.- .19 °I S EE( _r; f
1 4 r - j sd F '41
1~
' , ra oFFICIAL SEAL Notary Pub U for Oregon ~ ~ r ,
` M JO ANN HAYES ;
t„
Z 'T NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON F t y - d' 3
° ,"I. T. e ~ rnrco~issroNEl PIR[SnV06 ,sss My Commission Expires: h ~ m'-x} ~ ;
YF
I ~ r
' 2 ` LUd.%JoX. fp=.dm - ~7 c t, l
> 1-._- yr+ .yY M 1 ? -
r- £jk"~-fig' t,r X t'eP .zxry
gI , G ~a ; r
r
n' _ a z j
1 ~ j eS f S~, F, x h
l3~ 3 r n
s a ( `y 7t - s' - ` r L. _
IY tro M ; t - xz, ,h V r t -
Z y t - - - r" a - r. t~F1 l
L t
M"' , - . . , , ~
f .~F 1
. _ ~'V T ~ _ , _ ' _ ~ _ ; ' , , _ _ I -
9 j, 4 t # 1
err P } isvE} $ r{ -5 K
{ jF9 -
! } - ! Y
r: - wr,.
~`rrt`^'"'-y-.R.^-^.-ar-T^ ~.w.r.-~..~-n--.E----.^C'^_w z^.~`!- 4 1
YEA. _3 6 - - -
f 2F - b - - -
} G E y, - _ - - -
I CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 96-~
f
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 13.04 REGARDING
PAYMENT OF A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT IN INSTALLMENTS.
Y-_
WHEREAS, subsection 13.04.070(b)(2) of the Tigard Municipal code provides that an application
for paying an LID assessment in installments shall be rejected by the City if the assessment
together with the unpaid balance of any previous assessments against the same property equals or r s'
exceeds double the ash valuation of the property; and i
o- ~ r
w o tap efv
•r HNNH\, the assesscxr ' slue r on t ..1.0.. Ml1/i.\!7\ °"oJpre v
t v cc.Tu,.ca..t ;r . emu.I...°e..`..... n. Vi ..J F 7
owner from being able to pay an T' M in installments because the assessed value of the x ~ n 4 x
property is insufficient; and r
t
WHEREAS, the assessed value of certain properties is well below the real market value of the ;
A V,
3 property, particularly in the case of partially exempt or specially assessed property; and
j; WHEREAS, the City Council finds it beneficial to amend subsection 13.04.070(b)(2) to allow an
increased number of property owners the opportunity to pay LID assessments in installments;
now, therefore:
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: x k g
K
SECTION 1: Subsection 13.04.070(b)(2) is hereby amended to read as follows: 3" 3W f
z C
"(2) The finance director shall accept the written application to pay in installments s -
unless the amount remaining unpaid on the current assessment together with the =
unpaid balance of any previous assessments for improvements against the same Y i
property exceeds the real market value of the property ' i
f 5u- T
yF ti i~F t ~.~1- -
SECTION 2: Subsection 13.04.080(c)(3) is hereby amended to read as follows:
~ E.
3 No on shall be made unless each
segregation part of the original tract of land
after the segregation has a real market value, of one hundred twenty percent or
more of the amount of the lien as to each segregated tract concerned." Y
rdl
PASSED AND APPROVED this. day of 199
6 ~F
a ,
l _
7 4
yr
~ Y
T: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
w , ~y/{UV-" i y
City Recorder City Attorney
DATE: Jo k.
j'Tr
sx r
a
! t ~
TIT
ti._.. u s~_. i i_ ~ _t;._ - ~ _.._.4. .Y. ._e..L.c~ .rv - . _ ~ Mui„3
iip
K~F
-K 0~
N, L
~ yrl
R -55
F ~ `l„ ~ hai~ Fb
CITY OF TIGARD
~ -ya SH 6 f d4 T`~E -
F ORDINANCE NO. Z7 t 4
A L }
-11 07
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18.164 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE i'x s q
a t AUTHORIZING EXCEPTIONS TO UNDERGROUNDING UTILITY REQUIREMENTS. t r
~ b~ ¢,X x2 4"s f ~
> K
Nst f?
ar WHEREAS, Section 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code requires under
~ - ground utilities to
r be installed under certain circumstances; and 4 r'
p ~
Al,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there are certain instances where exceptions to those
requirements are warranted as set forth herein- 7TWM 4
NOW, THEREFORE; THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS ~M
A~
SECTION 1: The Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.164, "Street and Utility Improvement r a
Standards" is amended by adding sections 18.164.120(C) and (D) to read as wk~ t Yx'
a
follows: '
I, szf
18,164.120 Utilities Y x .f s;
r - j
j F? "R
x C. Exception to UnderY~
~ grounding Requirement:
7 1. The applicant shall pay a fee in lieu of undergrounding costs when " the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing
utilities which are not underground will serve the development and ~k
the approval authority determines that the cost and technical - "
difficulty of undergrounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of~
~ - undergrounding in conjunction with the development. The omm
determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common,
but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for ,
+
which undergrounding would result in the placement of additional
ff E
~i poles, rather than the removal of above ground utilities facilities. A
2. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which a Yi~
r _ 6 are not underground and which are located across a public right of 14i x
way from the applicant's property shall pay the fee in lieu of r
undergrounding, s r
3. Properties within the CBD zoning district shall be exempt from the x 1
requirements for undergmunding of utility lines and from the fee in
Neu of undergrounaing.
4. The exceptions in subsections 1 through 3 of this section shall a
f PP1Y g E
only to existing utility lines. All new utility lines shall be placed f.
x a t { underground.e
3 l
-j X
3 8
T a r -,4 g~ 3~~ r
I A
' ° > s r r - ~ yam' - a 3- ~ 3 v
U, Vk
`w-C I b t' - - r i i E .1 k~
mk,
'Yb
11 ffii
, TPA - - - - - - -
~ y ~S ~ rtlea _ ° tl i
g r
1
t
-,-j
,tO r _ f a n
D. Fee in Lieu of Undergrounding.t- -
_ 1. The City Engineer shall establish utility service areas in the City._
All development which occurs within a utility service area shall a
a fee in lieu of undergrounding for utilities if the development does z`
m
not provide underground utilities, unless exempted by this code. "'y 2
yk
2. The City Engineer shall establish the fee by utility service area
i "
which shall be determined based upon the estimated cost to
underground utilities within each service area. The total estimated -
cost for undergroundine in a service area shall ►,F. arr ecated an a ;
front foot basis to each party within the service area. The fee due
from any applicant shall be calculated based on a front foot basis. k' }
-
3. An applicant shall receive a credit against the fee for costs incurred
in the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities. The City C r
g Engineer shall determine the amount of the credit, after review of
r cost information submitted by the applicant with
the request for
credit. .a`~ __N ?-€S'r""ss'"~t `•:y+,~r.
A{ rS~ ,kT 5N
4. The funds collected in each service area shall be used for
undergmunding utilities within the City at large. The City Engineer - E 3 r _ -S
shall prepare and maintain a list of proposed udergrounding
^X. S Si`ww 3'` i
projects which may be funded with the fees collected by the City.
The list shall indicate the estimated timing and cost of each project. 3 ,F
6 P list shall be to the City Council for their review and
3 r
PASSED: By voof all City Cod cil membe rs pre
sent after being read by
number and title only this y of 114,L!4 1996. € t i _
r
- lea ~ 3 therine Wheatley, City Recorders r
APPROVED this --3 day of , 1996.
J oli, Mayor k
r APPROVED AS TO FORM:
z
~t yl~ 4 -'a - 17 J`Fi- ~{t~ T
3 City Attorney E
z _ t 7/'1 p s- 3e _e ro7- ~y Y
JI.
a Date V
pjbimmdXu6udiwdertW.or2(7111F96) Y h ,
z _
v t
~r 1
y r T } k ;
t ,f 1
t{L...~. t
-
r u
fi d - tF _
' ` ' fa ~
111 111~ -
` y ~s A~ Ki iT (YI` dl~: ' Z VISITOR'S" AGENDA:,... DAT ut 23 996 x Y~-
11 3 fl } C ,.rn k k - ti s - t T' C 4iY } i "t
V (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) 1~
f
s - w n - - "t'jfi
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear s$
r, s from you on other Issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your`
z i 2f i a +
t r concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the , ; - rl
meeting. Thank you. V r 1
- , STAFF :e: j a 5
NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC CONTACTED ,~4~ " r
~ ate
J+TCi11 {-7f~Y~ _ F/w~i W.., i jT~ 1CM j,~C~f7+ - v+€>r.,>;y` s _
~ 'k 8'A I 1,3
3 - - t of ,`~~.x'`~a f'"Z -
(E
4 ,0.~
- : - iii . ~ 11
~ 1; I
a3
t _ S, j, t"
x 1
5~ d*` f i .1 +x..,4,5}.k.
r.
r d
c
i'' ~ q~ W t ,jz
i - 1 1N_' Lt F
f --1 i fTa - 1
_ f
jS
s
,ra A i:ladmyolviaitah4doe i Vi i{YM~ i x
1A 1I IL
r
i I F'-r- "I " - - ~ . , . , . - I I I I , , _-L"' ~L ,
`'a 1 r 7 ~ ,!c-' *'x'""wr..r,,"."a'sr. a<v - .°r_..~. - a ir 5 r ,J
t s,' 3 - "^^v^,vara": .X.M*'r° .ry - SG -.T t i
A d f _ yv - v 2 -'t
s% - -4,, t - ,F X E
34 15 X - f x - . fF'
y
~ FF
1411 " 5 - ,
r )
-c' a4#_ j _ _ N
z s r w
M , ' _ . - !'-'.-1r,. r ~ I ; , 11 . , '4- - - I , , , . L, _ ~ ~ .
- . ~ , ~ , _ , " , , " " , ~ W
~~"'~-~^'RT„ t _ eu'+~'a~T....r.~ ,^+_y+. ~•-r.~~..-...R...sra~ .'_-^<r~_.»~....~a ~z^.^°'~~~Fff 1 j.
.T C
Y, - -
-tom°, _
~z x
, F111, " - I ~ ` , " ~ ~ ~ - ~ , ; - - " . ' ~ - ' - z . ~ - , ~ - '~t' -
4
.4~'t'm F -t i - " 2 7-
-he _ - . _ S -,°4 ! 1 'L
~'i '4~. "~k'_ ~ - `t~ , , . , ~ : i - , - . I—_ ~ Y hg d, -t w - ® -
x t - r'
a f
w
i epending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of y ~
s xr = ne each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may e ,
further limit time if necessary - f' - `
. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement I; ~t
oral testimony. `s>
i - r~ ``y
sf-t l1 i { t
- - -t.
I r,
eve -
f
A1DA ITEIii NO+ ' r DATE: JUIY 23x,1996 5 r •s,
11 11
ff[cc[.. ~ p~,~a
.1 , 'z
5 PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 96- t. zY ,
off
t:. s
21, 3 J, 0004/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 96. 0003/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) 96-0002 SATTLER - " 11
{ SITE REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map and zoning map on 27.5 acres located on r? i- --s
r three parcels west of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Sattler Street. The application seeks to t w
r;'g
change the eastern 8.5 acres, along Hall Blvd., from Medium Density Residential/R-12 to Medium " 1 j f
{
Density ResidentiaUR-7; and to change the western 19 acres from Low Density Residential/R-4.5 to
k 3 x>. -.~M,.
Residential/R-7. LOCATION: West of Hall Boulev
tY _ '
and and south of Sattler Street. #i r~
zz Medium Densi ='rx . =x 110 ~
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.2(2), 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 6.3.3, a+~ r~ r
8.1.1 and 12.2.1(2); Community Development Code chapters 18.22 and 18.32; and Oregon ~ { 7"
Administrative Rules Chapter 660 Division 12. ZONE: R-4.5 (Single-Family Residential) allows t ';kRm =
single-familY detached units, manufactured homes, farmin famil da care and conditional uses such as '
g y Y %?a a , t. ;
single-family attached units, duplex units, religious assembly and schools. R-12 (Multi le-Famil 3 3;1
P Y r>:r s z-~
Residential) allows single-family detached and attached units, duplex units, multiple-family units, - 't z r<,4 tr s
residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivisions, public support and family day care
c , - ~ ~ T '
services and conditional uses such as community recreation, religious assembly, schools, hospitals and _P f % , x
# residential care facilities. rk ' y
g z x
~z f
r F,-
, , , , , ~
PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS y
r a + Sk
11-1 f r $ °
d
tw - P
'~i , ~ ~ - - ' ~
_ r _ -i kn
'M. L f
5
a Si
7 b- `
C r t
y -v
! r $
tt €'.i
1~ - } 5h ] N
C r d, - 8 hry I
I -
r - _ w r t to j
4~
s
r~
4c - r - C~" - n
~'~i'l'~~.`* , 'Q: ~t~.~ L : t':' ~ I I , ~ - 1, , - '~'~k_ , -
~&'_':'--_".'~'~~-.q,r -_-~~'-'I~' " _ . ~ I ~ - - . I I - 1. , . I ~ ~ , , - ` , , - , ~~_T'-~"..~'- . ,2;~ I ~
1
t 4 `1
;4
'
d
Fi t 4 F ✓ U -
+ y
- - - - - - -
s ,tea, t f
l - -'a - -t
r _
'"~t ur - _ - - - - _
1 _ k
s
.C t, s t-t t t
r
as , , ~
'fiy`5 }-1 - - a
- - o ..,:.ate. w.m...m.....__.. _ » ~......~....e...........~..e _ .Y. ..._.v......_ >
, 11 T. r_ I - - I
3 A
GI:NDA1 PENO.>:=
PLEASE PRINT ti
Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) 2
1-1 - a
N
4- u ` Name, Address and Phone No. Name Aand Phone No
0 0 IT5~ "
P i o a uo
Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address ap4 Phone No. - ® I
1 V-117' I
! _ r 6? W-e q - i F ts~ 1 '
Y f K c,, (nyfF2~ (y1! s z ~
f
Name, Address and Phone No. Name; Addres nd Phone o. T-
a - a n r^f s vw r~
J K
k{ - r Al ~s,'F,tt,~.ra ,1
i kc
- t / / - RY".x t3 NJ 1r~.
Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. *1
p VlJ l h A$ r . ,
~p ~
S - :
r ame, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and P one No. _ ~ ? ` ' . 'T
r r F
M x
3 }
Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. i}l t , - { u F-ON, 1 '.t ny.3', hd
- .i 4 3 T.
11 ~ -.~,D,~-.~ 'I ~ ~ ~ ~ , \ "g,' " ",*.,r,. -
Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Pho No
~y~ 13
4 1-;>1_1z~_!,4,e4,;kU,
1I-
Name, Address and Phone No. Name, A ress a N o 1 X- - t r °
( £ a c x
k/Ip i~ f)~ j ~r , z
- - 410 r £y 11
3 7
r+ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone N . ? ti
r a
di 4
~ ,f _
- : - 1.1.1- y rK' S y i t % 7, ~",;t~~l- - V
b ,
ft.
S - F h, x - `dSJ i
S r'
i 1. ~ , ~ I
_ `
n A
_ t t rr'.~`»g5z €n• - _ a , r.i zp-.=",'^*s g~,4~
~,~--",_Ir~,-__,rl'_., , , ,
- 11 r
r.
r- _ -fY'r a n 1_ _.,i
a r- x - & s -
ILL , , ,~-,L_,~",:~-__' A
>x r . f yF k
Zf
J 4
sl - - F - - r -
_ _ , - w a {
_ 111
r- y f x CS
r
A_ - 1
Ei j{ C _ 1
F ; r
. ~ ~ cm,~
Yx s t ke
r
j
y j
_=,.i__.
.~._..._._3. -
i x ~ ~ ~ ~ orb aQ u- zr i F
'S' z -t s _ _
- t' a a r?:.: - - -
- rrr~-' .a^,3i 'tea * fir ry -zt...t» - - s t - 2` h' t
a y'£t-, ' Ai; a _t t } s z . y? .f3'' WA *s lli r, 0 -61 9 z. f t
-A.}"x# -,g v .Lt'(r- - - F _ - - _ i Z., f -
r` ' P'' dw ra v c i4 sinSg
' $ *
` 3 ,I "qtr " 'A
11 - ?
i5
roxr+".-. '2'Lt y4 - h~V ~ -
I pending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of t fi } ,err- Z "I
1
>a~¢ ;ne each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may ,emu
further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated b the Council to supplement - a!; '
1 - T ST- w v"} d t.F .y......-
d oral testimony. ' I w
e
-11 "
s = l L-
3
11
ri L Y t t 4G~s ~a
t'-ss'x- a ~GENDA'ITEM 1Yfl.: ='DATE:--July-23;:I 6;;' gg- Y
t n s x ,
J , ` + PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 96-Ml i r',K
- C~ ,tip t
# BLEDSOE = f _ -
8
igx ; - r REQUEST: Amend the text of the Urbanization section of the Comprehensive Plan by adding a new P ~ , ~ s -
r I policy as follows: 10.1.4 An exception to Policy 10.1.3 is that the city may assign zoning closest to i, V1111 "I
' ` existing development in low density residential established areas. a ~ "
LOCATION: Citywide. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10 N PROW °
~y - j and 14; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1 and 6.1.1; Tigard Community Development E ,,RY_- r-~'~~'~r R" Z'
'
- =s. Code chapter 18.30 and; and Oregon Administrative Rule Chapter 660, Division 12. ZONE: N/A " : a- "a,
,
a ;X54 N, -1
r PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS x R': - 11-6
r = ~
h~ a ~~w 1
- ~R 01 €M e
-f.- 'I MW '~A_'~k~""~~"'z~'t~'~ , .j~~ I [-,--n
' ~ ~+~uq~:~ 'i I
- s - r --,,,ey t y71" f,> r
fky. .x 1 F I
ry y
d 4Y Y _ y E - 4`fiY'k si ''t l tY F [E[
y &4 z
, n l E ~ I t- ,
, 1-1
Y 5
- c -4 " Z rrnEy
s t ~rfi a.s~~x~M
"M t _ 'et -
.IN 'H f - s r ' "77" cc u_ .w-sue -wm..a l f , . .
-11
r ~p i F- _ sew ' j
` - , - " - , 4~,:' ' ~ _ ~ "J-"'
" - ',~f" , 1 U 7-'-' , - - . ~ ' _
J M r t.
Ita' t-~a3Yrd- z Yxi Ie - t -
N c qr 1. - _ _ , - s aM z i
sp~'~S Div"9 '3 'r r~ j 4
J " x e
x x -
e „
- 1
F ?e.^ _ "x . _ .v^• ~~T fem. - - cam""," _
t
-
xr
-e
a S,
w
Ca ' z z
€ -
{4 t
- - { z
- .1 op yx' 4 f - - - - 1 4 5 i, 4} -`T'-~5'S
s GENAi IT1 M•NOt a L
~j, a M - PLEASE PRINT Y
_4 Proponent - (Speaking in Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against)
~z~t r
x t Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. " - r
use ~ ' a --~i~
"f; ux.- h 5 's ue' £ psi
,
'y"r"2" r 3 - sue' fez
Name, Address and Phone No. f ~.~.i Name, Address and Phone No. { - ' c ® Y1
7
Name, Address and Phone No. Name; Address aid rh ne No s ~ 'a
.W' x
7 t
,14
e-- 4_, w
-x.-. --r. , _ . " Fwd
r j' - - - w 21- a .s
Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. s j
rz
F
t R "M -I v.
i ; ame, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. , i
r
- r i 1' +
Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. - ~
i _
Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 5;- w ~ %
'
9.{
$ 6. rs k
Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. a
£ r _ f ~ €
i a f
Y t - a,{ R M
_ _ 3 ; i ' fit i
- Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. C'' 4;g ~ r"x
s v `s
k,-,4k{ zr- + s ? y 4
a- f+ ~ may„
W -4 . 1
x
w t r-
f rS r - c ~ ,x M. av. --T-. _ _ ;y r fps w
3
Z y 1
C - S e` „ 3'k' 4 `af `kr
4
mil, r" X t v.> - F:~ - xt `~f f
y. fir' - - F' -1
pt,,. l - 3 ? t - 1 ,y'' ~i
p - ° q,F'
t
} - - f 4 '
i__...-a~_..~.~.~. ~.v.t-..-.. ._r .-_c
"IN 7777n. P~t~
~ t
a dt,
" r
{
- O 9~ Lim t
w n
r
tm w S "ki x8
--A ZM
Ay M
4ti
S ~tR
1
P f ~ f ~ a
j S A
t ~z
P ~ ~f
^ ~ 3 s
i
Fs s~ j
_ ST r r _ _
Vicinity Map n
t /y"\i L
Note: Map is not to scale N Fs
f
l
77-
iz~
rt
r
k r. ~ ~ _ may.. _ ,u._._~_ __~~~_.L.~. e. _ ~ s~ _ x. . r_...,...,.,~~ u._~ _ _ ~,L,
a
3 E p . F
N NO ,..,e 11_,~:_,~~7 1~111'11`~Z ~ I ,~1,`i.:~'.-;,~~f~-,~"' ~ . _ - , ~ ~ , ,`,,,`~'z~~'~'~,~,~,,,~;',~ -";";~~,",Ji,i,~,"'
Q #t1 f `
ii~f - - z , x ts.-Y.~~ ur ` . - i - ~ Y e -'"x v-r- .ti'!2l z a >;v * r'` '4-; 'a'+.~ - ~ 3 - W .4
1,; M - ~,_-Jb,, a.,c`" s'~. asp.- ~~S'Tea .sZf,!.s.. _.-....=...x. .,__`.,...z.ma...,.__.~..+-...~...: .5..a...a.,F.m.,_a >z., w cY::F.: 11 q r s-
;f 'k`3i - S `gyp E Gt - i k
i - ti x w
K I
2
_ j AGENDA ITEM # 3. D_ ~
-t ``a I For Agenda of July 23. 1996 , , a r a °S
3 ; a-y CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON E fi § .ti
- s' '
r { .y COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY r „ ® 4
t' b ` -i ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Approval of Municipal Court Judge's C-~' '^t i , n r * -n_ `t
x s PREPARED BY: N. Robinson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OKJ.1-..'_V'~,""., 44--1-- ~--_kl~"O, , ,
c Yy i ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL`
~1____
w
zr^a t- ^x 'e'a'u
- . Policy was set by Resolution 88-21 to appoint iudicial staff after nPgntia?ing a personal crrvicac contract za }
'e"s' - _ in _ d .2 µ ,
til_ r~
ax a' ' L a m i
STAFF RECOMMENDATION > -i
Approve resolution renewing Michael O'Brien's judicial services contract for 1996-97. I. d z tz, -1 I
-1 11
INFORMATION SUMMARY_ '1_ " ,
.1` 3 ' x,' - f ~
u„ t i Since 1988, the City has entered into a personal services contract for the municipal judge function. The City has ¢ $
s cL 1 ~ # r Y >
x ntracted with Michael O'Brien for judicial services since October 1989. ~v k t ~ Y $
~it4 y
T If the contract is approved, Judge O'Brien will be compensated $1800.00 per month to preside over hearings, r ; e
` 1 ~ s review and update Municipal Court rules and procedures, and conduct research as needed. The monthly payment , a
is the same as in the 95-96 fiscal year. If the average hours, over a three month period, fall below 26 hours per r x
I~~~,- 1--IR - T.~I~.,~,'~.' ,_1
r _ - month or exceed 30 hours per month compensation may be renegotiated. In the 95-96 fiscal year, Judge O'Brien 4 119--l ,
1 averaged 29 hours per month in his judicial capacity. z g r'.
'k$ F'j t,- - . ft "M
OTHER A.TFRNATIV CONSIDERED i. ,~x, ~ j~`~~~ ~ I
Y. l } { ,R per' W ,t w " N f. i
"r ° ~ ~ FISCAL NOTES ~ F 1 t, r _
c z 3 r~-~
r - ~r >WTa .S~sta f.
a £ { $ 1 Sufficient funds have been allocated in the 96-97 budget for judicial services.
I
€ vi'n' c`~`~+' f`"' E
S~. Y`` { , c-- ibip,.,d lwm don { b rT" r 3[
r 2 s--- + .^n ~ - .ti
,w r- - x t-- `'C
rm- - } va sf
f a
res. LS'- 1L``^a _ ,1
t
a T" p.x . .`r 'ui>'~' r,'. " -"_.;r.w:t s ° _:x~, _ z a - ' x^x. w',s'-r`r :.*a,. •T. y^r a w+C - ry 'x
lcr'"h L F _ x - y~ '
i -t ` t _ S _ - 6 L
u r
, - - ~s, ,~f E " , , , " - , M
- r - -_-t' 8 f- 'e6cm
skit
- ^n. # » i
tx
z » ? r r r
~ , • hi - ` } 3 iN? ,.fur i r
11 t:1, - 11
z n ¢
~ , ; . ~ ` 5 I- I` - " -.1 _'_1`1: - "
~1;t~l - 11L_~~, ~ , , . , , , - - , " ~ a -
--`v '.J - - - -'r
4^r.-'^~ _ -..~~.-•.--.-.`•-r..•-wR- --.~-..~.rn.,..~~-.~.~...-~.-.mow-~Y'-"V~.y' _ - -_r'"'te", a
, . 1
i'_ _
"
-~~~y,,,S'? rye rr - - -z,.y'ti f
w. v`a's .r s - - p ~ t z" - --4.t 4 0
t3-- - vv~ - 5 i - i- - - _ a k - k, SFr - -
n- _ c ..._W.».,...,~,-~:..:a. "..,.._......._J.~,. ""~y c-' rr y- re~r
"'~x S tY
4 F° 4 7 f 4 - "nom
2far - . -i- , 6Yx', ;-x 4-
r
- 1 3,3
-t AGENDA ITEM # flll~ 5 r
r 3 s For Agenda of `I Ac, 3 ! t? (47 x + s
I
k lr, ry CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON # : _ f
V r x COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 1 '1 r
a ' ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Tigard and the Tigard/Tualatin 7 ~
1 11
s
School District t "
t t - , / f Rys't
1A 4r7nT ugen Me CITY n iN OK " - ~ 'k -
PREPARED BY: Liz Newion . , . _ CI _ ADM
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL _ `--a °+z
` Should the City Council authorize the City Administrator to sign on behalf of the Cites, an Intergovernmental ,
-11 „
511 r- - Agreement between the City and the Tigard/Tualatin School District regarding the traffic signal at SW 79th t ?,M- ~ {
'K- ' Avenue and SW Durham Road? Q - z ~
1~ _ - 5, s r.,, >'R Z ''a'k+" cwt,
GAFF RECOMMENDATION N - `r r
- I
Approve the attached resolution which authorizes the City Administrator to sign, on behalf of the City, an " ~ °
u ° - _ 'r' Intergovernmental Agreement with the Tigard/Tualatin School District. ""y l , '
INFORMATION SUMMARY ~S ~ z Mf - -
~ . The District and City each desire to participate in funding the construction of a traffic signal at the comer of SW J f i ~ c n
j s row
l 79th and SW Durham Road. The traffic capital improvement was suggested to the District and City by area y 1,0 ~ PI z* - 1W
a sidents. These residents suggested that a traffic improvement would allow for easier and safer crossing of.t~ r ,
Durham Road at this location by school children. - > s a !Cr~ T - On June 11, 1996 the Tigard City Council adopted a budget including a capital improvement project for fiscal year s -..2
.'`x's-.'s~ a o:
1996-97. The budget authorized $49,289 for the City portion of the cost of installation of a traffic signal on~? ;
Durham Road at 79th Avenue. ' s
2~
' On May 21, 1996 electors in the District approved a bond measure which included an amount not to exceed afg s. t
' $50,000 to pay for up to fifty percent (50%) of the installation of a traffic signal on Durham Road at 79th avenue. t. k 11,14, x~
f, itv i
' OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED - V" p[
None ~ , mss *w_ ~
FI CA .NOT ~ ' 4 E
r - .f 9'' r
i The funds for the City's share of the signal project are authorized in the 1996-97 budget which was adopted on t x ~ '
June 11, 1996.
r ; z{~ s'
- - pt p% - I N - L
y F
"r t - u - ? i:kitywide~SUmVizigadoc ~f - n / ' g, i?`, 'fi't ~ j
'j - t - 4 -M"
_ 1I F ~ i
2
r
Y -F }rev -}.5.= L - E?R ~~',~j j
F7
R
r
3r `f f - t- ,r k df o- {
12 , - ~ - ~ , - , - , , - - , :*~.,_I,_ Li ,
r~ N' - - a e - sr fi
r" rv ~7 s
- 12
r fi
- - ,~`,.L, " - - - ~ - 11 . ~
i -
~ _..__a
_'cao3-
- . , _ •
- -
FIN - ,-r4 a'* y `w 7
rx
r :
I -1-
~ 5x ' ti v
n * Lid ' - L , M 43 z
0 ri a g- { r -r - • `
._.v._.o.,.__ .a w.,a~„a.....- t- - is .Ia
ter, -
4n
b q 'd
hs _ AGENDA ITEM#, 3,5 -I x tk' . x a~
a For Agenda of '71~.~ l4ty ` ; '
; 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON . ' 09 -11
il
JJ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY pYp66`~ ~`t fz, ni,
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Approve acquisition of property on Walnut Street at Tiedeman a a 3 t s
` - PREPARED BY: Gary Alfson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK - ki
2~~~ a `
00-1
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL. , .6
11 n Approve 'w a acquisition of property at the intersection of Walnut Street and Tiedeman Avenue, and authorize the + ~ -
11 City Administrator to sign the Option Agreement. n '
r i M
' STAFF RECOMMENDATION ` . vg ~X '
Approve the acquisition. I r N
t
k INFORMATION SUMMARY ' "%kZ*' -
x araw ' - a
The property at the intersection of Walnut Street and Tiedeman Avenue has been for sale by the owner and a recent ~'~a~-} , - ~ "t t _
re destroyed the house on the property. The intersection of Walnut and Tiedeman will need to be realigned in theme ~ ae~ x ~1
' i ture to improve the safety and capacity of the intersection. The subject property along with others will need to be { ' ~ t t; ~a
Q ` acquired to construct the realignment. Since it would create less impact to acquire the property before it is `
' 11
redeveloped we have been negotiating with the property owner to acquire the property. The property is currently I,. Sri
~ outside the City Limits but would most likel be annexed into the Ci in
the future. The County also sees the 3 -4 D
y n ~ k ~ r ¢
- benefit of acquiring the property and has agreed to fund 50% of the cost. The Option Agreement has been
4110 - .
;1 reviewed by the City Attorney's office and has been signed by the property owner. ~ - % _4 r ~
tK - . E T
Q7
OTHER A T NATIV ON ID R D E x t
uP
4 ~i , -11 r } - s# -
' FISCAL NOTES ~r~ " A.' k
j ,
Funding for this project is designated in the 1996!97 Capital Improvement Program from Traffic Impact Fees. The e ' £ s
a ~ purchase price of $134,000 is identical to the appraised cost of the property. Washington County will refund the r a
x i City 50% of the cost of acquisition and associated costs. r
@SS@ y
1 S 5 u•J-y`i t&
7-,x sr i +t 1- _ sa?~r~,.c,`yeef e _J
-p' ~n - t F }L_. 11.",de-1..ryiut sum. _ 1. a,3Y#y N. iE
E
M r f
,t z - C n t+x
` k p F r z $ -5'Rp* rrx.t~.. ..G - - :s"~ 2-'', i N "m :,~;~»,?c-:~.w. ~s-;.c^w,zr.4..k a'R _ ~.k~ ~z Sg y 1
--t Y -~U ~ " - , L , , - - - -
r - I -1 x
V .1" ?-'N, { F h, _ 1, { J p 1
"ergsN3 a - _ - sh~,_ ate
e'a K.~.ra - r' - - - _ 'ti
7 s r~- t 1 - 1
Rf A 5 k,¢
✓
I ,
J _ - r..
, ~ I I , ~ ~ L ~ , * : ~ I , ~ : M ~ "I , a , , I
fi T - -
$ r
v
g'~r - y - , - -y
7 S Vr ) _ _
-A -
1
a y
1St ~w`r23",,' J q~rf'}# -
s1- ~fAt F~ t ~.µ/L~, , 1 y
a
-M I u ~ r r
11 I EL IM ,W I z,'x
'mss ~*a - -L L, ' -
~Ao
y ~r E ` I 2L z ~ r ®o is + +aa ~ "°e ' aSS7 -
r JUL- 9-96 TUE 10:56 RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX N0, 5036447400 p,pl k< 3
sbF,
'L" fro' S t,},'. x#ar' Z-i 'q
q~ z a
4t x-- 3 S5': " E
1 C
~~s
~t Right-of-Way Associates, Inc
'Itz x
f $ EaveAoo, OR 97005=sA,a.~<.§; s
t v';r=..: s,x<. + FAX No.: (503) 644-7400 x'r" ' '
a'` -'I %ooe No: (503) 6443436 f`-s3') i I L
1 g r FAY/ AMMO SifiEET'
} ~ P4tTrel:Xramer 1 „
; ~ Date: Tilly O 1996 ; r t a z ..fir s.;
-r ! Project /.96022 - -
4 Transmitting to: Gary Alfson ' ZU ~
r r Index 1:96321 r ~a yC3 i & _
~F a City of Tigard ,
s '11.,X.- Fax 221-1171 ,
~W, r > From: Nate Pool ~
t
.3 1 -I I
41-' i 4'~t1 F
Subject: Walnut Avenue at Tiedeman Appraisal F<"~~'$"r*
RE: Tax Assessor's ID: 2S 103AA 01701~, r W-0 - ' Kramer Option TE , f .
ti Number of Pages: 14 including cover sheet >5j' fi -
1 °i t' ;-z,.- .
' Message: Please find attached the transaction documents whereby Mr, and Mrs. Kramer F es " 3
a~ a ' 11~& ~
have optioned their property at SW Walnut and SW Tiedeman to the city of Tigard. Y a k< , .
t r F t gY t 3.,,,
,s r,'~+ j
t' a I- Please contact me by phone at (503) 644-3436, or by FAX at (503) 644-7400 with our ,}I a~ p
questions, concerns or comments. y_s
.4z Y = t,n - I
;
s ti - - -
xr,
t s 401 F~ ~~-a cM
bx-rr a - f'}-,~S,q
v ; t ram t1 -1111
r F
u , @ - - i" tits f , Y-, r 4
`s` f' x - -P - .i r - ~ ~ - t $ f x i k x ? }FF----
a w s #
~-r3 -~r"s3,r t__ -
$
Cll ~;WQX, f* * i I s t y1T
^.n-7 ,4. y'i =s~s4'~u?r(gynn"~'~+a7 ss«v y- - .r - ~.a s. `4
"4 , {y t~l - f _
a - - ( -r ia.F ✓xF .>r- r - _ 11 - -3 -
YI' }C~ r U - - 4T~,p $ Y, ~Y
t
x y
~rsy`:'t f~l 7atk- y }J tr s,w i r I
a "N"
1' 3s I s - _ r _ - - 4
,r .F k[ 3 s, f r- 1
, - - ~ - , ~ ~ "'i ~i- - - . ~~Ic ~ , , , , - - . I . I M
T r,i ..mss
. .
'
-
- , - 6. 1` g
s -
_s._>-
- .r. LF _.r .i C.-:.c.__3~r:
~
. - - - - - - -
i .A. t- 1, F _ i - - -N
f 't.. c _ y k r
;3^ Y 1-x ~k- - s `t
at r- ~"'"",'t es.mv:- .t ........,...a_.,.. , ...s.~:ar_: .-_t.-rte: rR f_, , T- s,.~x - v- -3
~m -7 JUL- 9-96 TUE 10;56 RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO, 5036447400 P. 02 ` ~8 e~
a ~
,iw I . R- ,4 ~;j ~,'l
s~~ _ ' t,
a xr sa Yet` - t
j OPTION AGREEMENT , -
i 1
a r
DATE: S- ~ ~ , 1996 ("Execution Date") hYr
'a ~
. ~z I x k s
' { F I FROM: John A. Kramer and Jean C. Kramer ("Grantor") -
t , t
3 TO: City of Tigard, an Oregon municipal corporation ("Optionee") , s j l
RECITALS s
RU - -
WHEREAS, Grantor owns fee simple title to real property (hereinafter Property) consisting of F ~fi r; ;
rz z - approximately ,89 acres as shown on the Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 2S, 1W y ~ ~ x
Section 3 Quarter Section AA as Tax Lot 1701, (as described and shown on Exhibit "A" attached <-A 1
hereto), together with all improvements, hereditaments and tenements appurtenant thereto. `.r rw';V,2~~
4 'r- d J,3t4 t s 5 hJ
WHEREAS, Optionee desires to acquire an option to purchase the Property and Grantor is willing fi
;k.'- to grant such an option according to the terms set out in Section 2 of this Agreement; and.; „ gip.;.i,
f Rai
WHEREAS, The Grantor and Optionee, in the event of the exercise of the Option by Optionee, are + al " ,
further willing to consummate the sale of the Property to Optionee by Grantor in the manner set forth l k
t -S ~4 Y s6yV'a'9.S 3 3 ,(3 i
_ herein. , K Q- ; 0~-
- #
NOW THEREFORE, based on the foregoing and in consideration of the payment of $10.00 and tiL~s F~~ t
= other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor and " g 9z }
` ' `R~
Optionee agree as follows: °
ttt
_ a L s`izu.rr 5
AGREEMENT Z~~~ k - ,
-
11
i Section 1. Grant of Option . ~ - ~ I
Grantor grants to Optionee and Optionee hereby accepts a sole and exclusive Option to Purchase the 4 S°' 1
a
x i Property, for $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt of which is hereby n z
acknowledged) according to the terms set out in Section 2. ' , 3, ;
Section 2. Option Terms A ` ~
5 a cs -a Iri
2.1 Term, 6 ~i
_ 2 E t, 4'T'
j ` ~ $ s' The term of the Option ("Term") shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue L
3 for a period of 30 days. E ' E 2.2 Effective Date, u
,x .
s ` Grantor hereby grants this option to the Optionee under the terms and conditions herein stated p,' -A
subject only to a previous agreement between the Grantor and Sierra Pacific Development Inc.. The h x Una
Effective Date of this option shall be the date of notification by the Grantor to the Optionee of the v , r
i y
release from the previous agreement executed by the officers of Sierra Pacific Development Inc. '4--, F(
yY'h, yl~ !3 . Z'~ £r, Yy5 t - t _i
~
Y ' y' _ ''ra4`= r a } y :t s F:-T - mFr~.. ~w-•. . , ' ~ -a - - y r
s - - i--t x r~- .yea" f _ {
l e
k
{s
111 , Y -j a'. 'G -
C t - t t - _ N - 4-y -
R~,',~ '~t-`,_ IL ~s,,~,~.~~:~-'--,.~, ~ - ~ - , , ~ , - I : , . , , , : ~ ~ - - - ~ , , --T,
a ,~4-y 't Yi tz n' - - - - _ i rirl {F p S
a 1 ;~r. t - ?
c + 't r r 7 e 1
sr s r a
i~
a F p - L
- _ " , . ~ I r~,,I-', -20 . - -
- - e. , s'
il S
-t
t
, , " , 9
, .:.~~m col f C I - - _F.
4~ _ _ t,~
T x
t $ SC h 1 - r..-!y_ a rrAal * ? Lt az,:d.... ....n...~,,.wt.gwv..a.......~.._., _r.sw«.e..we. u_reioa. wa.ew.«wv...~ • £
rat 3- - -l
JUL- 9-96 TUE 10:57 RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 5036447400 P. 03 k { s
4~,
i ,
1
1
z' , - . 2.3 Exercisg, of Option.
a t _ s i - -ie
` This Option shall be exercised, if at all, by written notice (the "Exercise Notice") given by ; {
Optionee to Grantor at any time during the Term which notice shall state the Optionee has
£ , s elected to exercise this Option. This Option may be exercised only with respect to the ~ _ - `
entirety of the Property, and nothing contained herein shall be construed as permitting e T
` i Optionee to purchase less that the entire Property pursuant to this Option. Upon exercise of l F~
, - l this Option, Optionee shall be obligated to purchase the Property from Grantor, and Grantor
shall be obligated to sell the Property to Optionee, for the price and in the manner set forth ti ' -
11 1
3 L1 Je.I. J. 5
# 2" +
C r -r°V°o
i ,L 2.4 failure to Exercisepiio 113,,Z'
k Jyy
ld Y
If Optionee fails for any reason to exercise this Option in the manner set forth herein, s`` _ .
° Optionee shall have no further claim against or interest in the Property. In the event of the ' 1 ~
failure to exercise the Option, Optionee shall provide Grantor with any instruments that t x r { s
{ ' Grantor reasonably may deem necessary for the purpose of removing from the Public record z z-~,- '
- ~
any cloud on title to the Property which is attributable to the grant or existence of this , , `
Option.
#~w
I 2.5 Right of Entry
p -N}
; Grantor grants to 0Ptionee and its contractors and agents a temporary right of entry upon the ti I- °
Property after the Execution Date and during the Option period. This right of entry permits A 7
Optionee to commence testing, measuring and evacuating the Property. Optionee shall be N ~ l ,
ermitted to drill one or more test holes for the of testing the soils for contamination i ° r~, F I aa--
P purpose a k E , sn
by Hazardous Substances". 4 j r~ j'& t y
z -
I - - b Spy-~i-
-
Section 3. Purchase Price W _ F _
J
3.1. Purchase Price. t {
In the event OPtionee exorcises its option to purchase the ProPertY, the purchase price for the ° may-
I' I
M
Property (the "Purchase Price") shall be ONE HUNDRED THIRTY FOUR THOUSAND - e
AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($134,000). k1 -
s
` 3.2 Payment of Purchase Price. t a r,,,~ w ' , a ,
- ,a a S- . -,Y-~. 5 -
The entire Purchase Price shall be paid in cash at closing. ' 5 -
_ ti z 'P , F
f
Section 4. n itionPrecedent to Proceeding with Exercise of Option'
t L *Conditions
_
In addition to the other conditions contained in this Agreement, the following conditions
precedent must be complied with to the satisfaction of Optionee prior to Optionee electing " 'r s
i to exercise its rights under this Option Agreement: ~'~_2y i ,
rx
3 1 -3 f k k - 4.1. Grantor Will Provide. ~ _
{
{ + k
r a. a Title insurance policy insuring Grantor's good title to the Property and their ~ 1 c 7 j
v ability to transfer said interest free and clear from any and all encumbrances; ' f
k s , ,'s
~ g r..~--Amv.,,C .:•s = , .1W1 k-' i tie - "w + ?s
, j
C I
t {S t _ t Y Ir
i t- y rz+ it r u
,i'-,!, LL - ~ ~ - , ~ ~ ~ , , - , ~j ,
F
x r - _ d
e s f rR+' F Y J
3
4f' t ,y'-F T._1
(i
I ~tw , 1 ~ ~ . ~ 11 ~ - - - . - .
. - - . - - - "TV 1..:
f^ f~ 3
t .t , v.-c - _ .x_ F_. _ . c _ s, _a - s~ r - il~"rT - ~ _
lzN
_ F t5 '
A - . - - - - - - - - -
JUL- 9-96 TUE 10:59 RIGHT OF JAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 5036447400 P.04
{ ~ f r
f
t ~ s
r
? b. a Document warranting that: 4
1. to the knowledge of Grantor, there are no Hazardous Substances In, ,
upon, or buried on or beneath the Property and no Hazardous Substances have been emitted
x or released from the Property in violation of any environmental laws of the federal or state
z_
government;
t 2.
Grantor has not brought onto, stored on, buried, used on, emitted or
released from, or allowed to be brought onto, stored on, buried, used on, or emitted or
a.
released from, the Property any Hazardous Substances in violation of any environmental laws r , m L ~Y
of the federal or state government; and
3. To the knowledge of Grantor, no underground storage tanks are
`j
located on the P[upe diw-b - r 11MI-WOM any storage tanks that contain, or
- rTy, Including l.Ct:.
previously contained, any Hazardous Substances, and Grantor agrees not to cause or permit E
any such tanks to be installed in the Property before closing. Grantor hereby discloses the i
- existence of an underground septic tank and its attendant drain fields which are hereby h
excepted by the Optionee, s Y
4. Grantor shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend at its sole cost the r
r Optionee from and against all Costs, incurred by the Optionee or assessed against the
r
' Optionee under Environmental Laws in the event Optionee or other state or federal regulatory
agency discovers the Hazardous Substances on the Property. As used in this subsection then; j
rte, ,
terms "Costs", "Environmental Laws" and "Hazardous Substances" mean:'
rt t s-
' { (a) "Costs" includes but is not limited to claims of third parties, f _ a $ }
S` including federal, state or local governmental agencies, for damages, response costs, `
p remediation costs or other relief as well as all expenses of evaluation, testing, analysis
t{ relating to Hazardous Substances, including fees of attorneys, engineers, consultants, ;
paralegals and experts.
(b) "Environmental Laws" shall be interpreted in the broadest t , "
sense to include any and all federal, state, and local statutes, regulations, rules, and
ordinances now or hereafter in effect, as the same may be amended from time to time, which
govern Hazardous Substances or relate to the protection of human health, safety or the
environment.
n c
(c) "Hazardous Substances" shall be interpreted in the broadest
sense to include any substances, materials, wastes, pollutants, oils, or regulated substances, k
or contaminants as are defined or designated as hazardous, toxic, radioactive, dangerous, or ' - k
any other similar term in or under any of the Environmental Laws including petroleum ,
products as well as any other substance that because of its quantity, concentration, or a ,
physical, chemical or infectious characteristics, may cause or threaten a present or potential
V hazard to human health or the environment. j
Section 5. Closing
' Closing shall occur within 10 days after the date that Optionee gives notice to Grantor that it intends t
to proceed with purchase of the Property. Grantor shall execute a Statutory Warranty Deed to be 1 i
j prepared and submitted to the escrow closer of the City 's choice . Grantor will sign an affidavit
r ter. n. M M-
c f
k
a is
t
f 1
~-_.-~-.c..~ rx.Wr,_. Yom. ~ ~ ~i _...r~ i. - ._~c ..3. .ux_ -i.. _ ..1 ~ - .~._.r. _..t ~..r ti_ ~
r
r z
y~
f }
3
10- ,tea' JUL- 9-96 TUE 11:00 RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 5036447400 P. 05 x,
r
. xt , , - - ~ v~ ~ sate- -
S A g 5 -c aX ate
^4- A - -J i L( - k feat ,C
} tq - efSS
° w certifying that Grantors are not foreign persons, trusts, partnerships or corporations in compliance ~ ,
a z with the requirements of TRC Section 1445. Optionee shall deposit into escrow on or before the #
_yF;,~, s „z. closing date the full cash payment specified above. F.
>x-
i Optionee shall pay all of the escrow fee of the title company with respect to closing,the premium forte
' the title insurance policy, all conveyance or excise taxes payable by reason of this transaction and
l the fee for recording the conveyance documents referred to herein. rt 7 -
r
' Section 6. r lion k *F' ~
Y _ ~ p -
All items of expense incurred by Grantor with respect to the Property shalfbe paid by Grantor at f< ~ I~pl kx - cs- R.cv,
' i _ closing without proration. All property taxes and assessments payable with respect to the tax year £ i *;F ,
11 "i
r ~ in which closing occurs shall be prorated between Grantor and Optionee as of the closing date.
z ~ e
N ;:ice' r
t Section 7. Successors and Assigns - , - Y ~
i The terms, covenants and conditions herein contained shall be binding on and inure to the benefit y 3r ~ z
of the heirs, successors and assigns of Grantor and Optionee. a +
Section 8. Attorney Fees x~
w
adz
! 0 If litigation is instituted with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shalt be entitled to t , 4
recover from the losing party, in addition to all other sums and allowable costs, its reasonable rs ,
attorney fees, both in preparation for and at trial and any appeal or review, such amount to be set t 'j. -
> by the court before which the matter is heard. - ^ ~ t
5 - r,~,
Section 9. Statutory Disclaimer ~ _ - -
. 1 'P
THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS ~
INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. , ' " ~ » k
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE t- ~ 1 -
TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY = ` ~ ~
J - ; PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY - ~ r
LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS t
30.930. " ` 4
j 'e, r
} 4 Executed on the day and year first above written. z'~
x
GRANTOR OPTIONEE t~-- 1 1.
E
r
f
y
By: Q 'ea°~ " CITY OF TIGARD ,c t -
rl~~4, --r", ~ Y - R
ohn A. Kramer,
{7 c _
ai. By' - if 1 1.
S By: Name: William Monahan ; , J
r+ - 1- Y Jean C. Kramer e r "Cy a i v
_ 11 Title: City Administrator * ~r,
a r :v;: t ";xK'~ r- "ai v~.e:b:axce.:.r;s ,.c•~.> lx.,- ;•s.:.: s; ~Y . _ --c.-:~` - , t:.+ - fp> s fi wN ~3 4a
z _ t a^ ,
Y - F r 'R Y7"
- 1 - 1 rt " _ . - J 3Y
, , ~ , L2 - , _ ~ , _ i . . I I f ~ - ; ~ ~ . I . ~ . g ,
'4~ 1 S i - - - - - i
k *
4 y, fi
P
- A h` 4
1 &r
Y r
S -tv^ Y '§'2 - i
µi k ' * - f
d
U
_ " ~ , ~ ~ : ~r , - , - 1, . - I 1 - - I - - ~
. - - f , _ -i
.~.....L ]-e y.~:.._. 4 ~_~r- _e...
- - - ' - ..:tea: .
}
SC v~
3 i- _ k ~ k ~ "tj+ t
}3 of r - -r° -ss->'fa r - -
r"i"''Ya ~ ~ sc z, - - _ , - - : - ti y .r. sz•_ t
MR3
1.111-A-A 41111
..q .rj ,
JUL- 9-96 TUE 11 01 RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 5036447400 P, 06 l7 t
rc. c e..r F
I!m
•;j."'}ss~ y,: k...•r:_- m,.- r.r ~t=r§k{'.?+d4:7:*
1 M'
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Yom 11,'11 ) ti4 r rs"'xn
g4 F On this day of 1996, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public
In and for said County and State, ersona ty appeared the within named John A. Kramer and Jean
C. Kramer who on the basis of satisfactory evidence are known to be the persons whose names are
xc•„ $ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same freely and
z = t==? voluntarily for the purposes therein contained. Y
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year r~ ' ^
last above written. h~k
V 'N
t1i } j OFFICIAL SEAL
j NGTNAN R_ DOOL Varyry Public for gregoh
*
v
NOTARY PUBLIC -OREGON 'My Commission Expires:, 1yy0 - V6Y/
COMMISSION NO.031455
-
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN. 30. 1998
a;
in~
wZyw,
cr,
a
u f R 7
0
kt_
t Ik t-~
t r 't
-xa
f' f s 4s*, 'has F N,r3r'Y' _
7 l r' b ~s i ~i~"~ EF J
r - c--t'
.r a
WIr "M
F
3 ~ ikP a "%5 5 f. Yµ ,n~ r i F e
q a Y Y d k-
I
Y r
%
1 43- Y )1 y / 5
yk ~ .j l 1 r~ - - 4
F E~- 9- - - -
4 'ea.5..",a.'i. S»M1 E_.. .>.v..f......:...4 ;..:s, _.,x v...,_- _ _ _ ~........u.w.a. ..-a:.'s.:M.r..Y...4 ..:sal e, ,...5u... .?'.s.. .t..?5. " ""I
JUL- 9-96 TUE 11:02 RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 5036447400 P.07
DESCRIPTION:
- EXHIBIT "A"
{ The following described tract of land being situated in Section 3, Township 2
{ t South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian and also being a portion of lots
1 and 2 of the duly recorded plat of ECHO HEIGHTS, in the County of Washington
and State of Oregon.
{ Beginning at a 1 inch iron pipe at the center line intersection of S.W. Walnut
Street, County Road No. 494, and S.W. Fonner Street, County Road No. 495; ihanca
f South 0°57'00" West 235.70 feet along the center line of S.W. Fonner to a point;
thence South 81 °09'00" West 20.29 feet to a 1 inch pipe; thence South 81009'00 West 140.66 feet to a 5/8 Inch iron rod; thence South 89°13'00" West 31.33 feet
to a 5/8 inch iron rod; thence North 0057'00" East 238.25 feet to a 5/8 inch iron l1`
rod on the South right of way of S.W. Walnut Street; thence North 0057'00" East
20.00 feet to a point on the center line; thence North 89013'00" East 190.00 feet a
to the 1 inch pipe and the point of beginning.
EXCEPTING that portion of the above described tract dedicated for road purposes r
on S.W. Walnut Street and S.W. Fonner Street.
r
-Z
a 7
s ss• 1~'w :n 1~ ~ s u• rs• IS s ' 1905
~''•uu a a77 !-of
WE V 100
70 70 I90 1' - -
i I I 0 0 I 1500 11600 1700 1702 1701
x 1904 ff "
!!AC yN ' x y f}e r
i /.tl Ae. I .tsar. .1l Ar, Al.t e, .4`94r.
144. ii I .w • N ^ ca rY 7 r~ - - ~ f~ P f
1903 rr f zf r tF ° - g..
I 1 N
141 r J H ^ t "'r
OOOLLa77~77~ ~ 3 a- ~
e • 82. 7• •2.47. 361 ass
1401 1400 18 0 0 °v
R n 46Ar• AlAr. to 101. is !4L[z I_ r _ -
q• es9.11•s 71.93 ♦0' , gin` uj
1 99
4f ~
a: s' I s s 9.s' 1704 1703 a
ry~ w
1200 1300 O A N i
O 1 N N . ~y S
20.4c. JOAC.
N N Q O A O N A Iti01 O } -
41% J5Ac
v 0
FOR y
ss9'u' w DON y G
19•L 161.73 LL i
3r! 3/.S re• - 171.9! Met"
jib wiricn is ~ ! .coded, without charge, for your I,Jfomuulon. It is-not intended to show all Matters rotated to fire ^ N r
property including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, oncroachrrmo, or location of boundaries. it w s
I isnotapartot,nordoesdmodify,anyreport orpolicy towhich Risanwhed.TheCompartymunesNOUABILITY
fnr env mewar mt°fad 1n this aYoMh Rnfmmnra ahnidd ha mada to an AM/rura 4urvav for further information. c i
v
Y
5 ty _ f
s
rt t
t'-£"°e+ x`"-ors X'~Y t A _
''T.~,'~~. - '•Y,~ j' - f - - tar
g .sew` - T } 4' 7
" ]j ^3.".5 _'^r c r 3x i - x a 1l ou'r' eta f
s, k r`LiS Er - er: - ,:e i,arsa~a..:....~..•,.. . ,.r..,», .a•,&.w e. ,,!r tx..t_:~, ...:~.r xa., . --,,a~? r '~d a''~ -
a ~ JUL- 9-96 TUE 11 03 RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 5036447400 P. 08
<
rte, ~4
1?~, z' SELLER'S PROPERTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT x ~ r. , - )
Kt r (NOT A WARRANTY) I 3
-'-,-V- 3 R ~ T *S - EALIORe 2-11 f .`s 1t
"IV &J? -~'rL' ; ~ W " ISTRUCTIONS TO THE SELLER V, a 'E' , T ' .
t fi-~ - - J Y Tt _ _ .'4'S,
- - leamptate the following form Do not leave any spaces blank unless the question clearly does not apply to the property. Please refer to the line number(s) _ r
s- w,, ~ ti f tat slbn(s] when you Provide your explanallon(s). For your protection you must dale and sign each page of this disclosure statement and each attachment. _ - } 5- 6 t v-,
- g - - -s k q - - -1, -r xx'*
5 r z fur j NOTICE TO THE BUYER a,s:"''
5 - 1 1- x -
t.gh
K - HE D nc E-ENiATONS ARE MADE BY THE SELLER(S), CONCERNING THE COND TiON OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT!_.
' xx r0 (i G+d .•ftrJ. (16 /i) li t (-THE PROPERTY-). DISCLOSURES CONTAINED IN THIS FORM ARE PROVIDED BY THE SELLER ON THE BASIS OF g - s_- 1M '?{rnz~'r
i ELLER S ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF DISCLOSURE (i.e., DATE OF SELLER'S SIGNATURE BELOW). YOU HAVE FIVE BUSINESS a - ~ _ t - -
Mt - r~- - AYS FROM THE SELLER'S DELIVERY OF THIS SELLER'S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT TO REVOKE YOUR OFFER BY DELIVERING YOUR SEPARATE SIGNED k -tip cr 1` ;
a A3JTTEN STATEMENT OF REVOCATION TO THE SELLER, UNLESS YOU WAIVE THIS RIGHT AT OR PRIOR TO ENTERING INTO A SALE AGREEMENT. 1 aK' - - ' . - £
r. I
f9
` +'R+.vkK;k+fi,..,,'.,v~.,-..`,,. .mil
- t - r;;~'.e ORAMORE COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION OF THE SPECIFIC CONDITION OF THIS PROPERTY YOU ARE ADVISED TO OBTAIN AND PAY FOR THE SERVICES - - a,r 1
- a-c - - ,r' IF A QUALIFIED SPECIALIST TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY ON YOUR BEHALF, FOR EXAMPLE, ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, PLUMBERS, ELECTRICIANS, { - ~ a s'Es r
~ ' ' DOPERS, BUILDING INSPECTORS. OR PEST AND DRY ROT INSPECTORS. , - -sti - ' ;
ti ,
r,Z y
a ! eller 0 W4fis not occupying the property. Tom" - V
tam
'0 K
+ _ I -
S~. s - r L SELLER'S REPRESENTATIONS: £ y_,- % i
_ t The following are representations made by the seller and are not the representations of any financial Institution that may have made or may make a loan -X x,'' 11 i _
- P
pertaining to the properly, or that may have or take a security interest in the property. r
I L
s
w` - - - Yes No A. (b have 1 1'.1 -'v*;=.ti:: ?"a`' °st a,'R 'tgr -
- , You ve egal authority to sell the property? ;'c t r7 ~f g,',. e
] Yes R No *B. To your knowledge, Is title to the property subject to any of ft following: +l= ,,,f- ,,~,X ;f -'t -x ig„ tt
, (1) First right of refusal ""r . _ 6_ 4m
_ ~ _ (2) . Option -'~~:'"`'''~"^~r"
'<''z - (3) Lease or rental agreement "4 ' 1 % - 11,
5 Z - r - (4) Other ILsti t , ,4 6 n x t'-e .i•'`~ 9
,ec
t r - - (5) Ufa estate? $ - k ~ a. i a!`
D ( ] No *C. Am you more of any encroachments, boundary agreements, boundary disputes or recent boundary changes? x r' i d - i
* - > - ]Yes No *D. Are you aware of any rights of way, easements or licenses (access limitations) that may affect your interest In the property? - '`~~fas.~' ?v r -
_ 7 Yea No *E. Are You aware of any written agreements for joint maintenance of an easement or right of w
ay? ' , >r - i
I MR
x - 1 Yes 'No F. Are you swam of arty governmental study, survey or notices that would affect the property? c "'AM
7 Yes No G. Are you aware of any pending or existing assessments against the property? br ~
_ - ~ ]Yes No H. Are you aware of any zoning violations or nonconforming uses? ;,Z v r, , T ~ ~s, 1 fi
] Yes No *1. Are you aware of a boundary survey for the
r x property? x 5 - i 4, r K r
3i r, _ t - , ]Yes No *J. Are you swam of any covenants, conditions or restrictions which affect the property? T ` ~ -k
t h II'~~' x, nf` Y- 3
t e li 2. WATER t ,r i
A. Household Water z,'~,'^*g~` t
PI - _ ,r s ,~s c +j,, I
- - (1) The source or the water is: ~ 0 ° ~ ',#$,y,.•'" yI. _ 3
> : Public 0 Community _ '$fs
' N ~ PrNate 0 Shared - - ; ~ L
- (2) Vyater source information: x- ss { S t
,4 ]Yes jNo *a. Are you aware of any written agreements for shared water source? I-
a , e, 7 Yes No *b. To your knowledge, Is there an easement (recorded or unrecorded) for access to and/or maintenance of the water source? , i
1 Yes No c. Are arty known problems or repalm needed? ; ~ ; v _ 1
- f - - , 7 Yes No (3) Are you swam of any, water treatment systems for the property? 0 Leased O Owned Y vt "v"
x &
jk- abl t t- B. Irrigation -f ,et-7 ¢L,,,
6x - q 7 Yes ~r~~g~,nn No (1) Are you swam of any water rights for the Property? - - r _ _ ' _
1 ] Yes q'No *(2)tf there exist arty, to your knowledge, have the water rights been used during the last five-year period? - w f p
- z, - : 7 Yes No #(3)11 so, is the certificate available? €,:n -f „4 - 4 ,
+ { rrt
- - C. Outdoor Sprinkler System , j- 1 P
. r - 4 , 1 Yes No (1) To your knowledge, is them an outdoor sprinkler system for the property? " _ 'f 4 ~ j
a 9 7 Yes ~N. To your knowle w r
` - ] Y No (2) • has a back flow valve been installed? - - ")~g ,
r (3) To your knowledge, is the outdoor sprinkler system operable? j~t'rtia - 4 ( j
rir _
i 'r - ° .
r"{` ..i 3. SEWAGE - s . $
r ~i t
I, 1,1411`, 5. r y j' ]Yes No A. To your knowedge, is the properly connected to a sanitary sewer? 5 - -
'
' r;
_ _ € 7 Yea ❑ No B. Are you swam of any sanitary sewer proposed for the proper ty
16 f Yea 0 No C. To your k owiedge. is the- property connected to a(s~eptlc system or cesspool? 'r ~ - r , ,rt i I
" - 1 Yes No D. Are you swam of any problems or repairs needed? t - `.~t, r Ii
r,~ " z , 1
;=3 k r 3 y ` - { 1 Yes No E To your knowledge, does your sewage system mquim onsite pumping to another level? - -'Z6
.
x "n s
7., -,'C' r l- D a-W^ ,emu - :.-+.µ.,~sea•wr c5- y. _ •L r ,,'r' g
fi C-' 5- 12 - - y k 3'
- ~ , ' ~ r I I ~ ,q ~ ~ , ~ ~ : - ~ ' ~ , j
V S `~R ? Y _ 4- T { _1
t r h E
- -
i t e "r ~ t-
ten' - t - I'^' - y,-
d li g4C -
rdx, r te. -
v mfr _ _ Lam„
. - - . ' - p y`~ V~
_ _ ^ - -
Y
i c... a~._Na,+.._1 °"~Fr .,t_ _.t.-_1 ..-a 1- _ s-_.~.~ taut Ye i...Y _ .~.c~- tc~ r... , _ L._._ 7 _.1. - - _ . s F,y{
s
N~:
MOM
. ^ Yb `3`sy.. 7x { R ,y r 't-'St - - k l 4
M -5 ME:-
S•..s ".,.s."`~`-f' ,..._..?'r.. x e _ ,Y - t r.> `r b- i 4 .x~ -
"'r -
{i- a "WIR T'.
~WZ M,
_ 4. INSULATION
I Yes O No A To your knowledge, is there Insulation in the: O' * -
s 's"><ysa w.-Zws ~Ye$ 13 No t11 CeivrgT et 2rx~ 3,.
No 3
2) Exterior watts? R z
fi I Yes l x
(3) Floors?
Yes No 4
~t ,x
any defective insulated windows?
) Yes No & To your knowledge, are Thera
py,t e +Y x ,rt- s x
ag4{ 5. STRUCTURAL
L p No #A. To your knowledge, has the root leaked? r-
s r' L Yes Q No v yes, has It been repaired? - arrfiy
) Yes O No S. Addlllans/oorrversions/remodeft? ....bta,u, p.., 5 'x,,=_ .r •~`a~~" a~ . -
'"t of whether « b:_1U! Perna was o
~a a . you ~v'C vii a e
I Yes ONO
£ ~ iS M', c., 1 Yea O No Was fmal inspection obtained?
x
~
x-- - - Yes ❑ No C. To your knowledge, are there smoke detectors?
NA H
k, Yes O No If there are, which are electrical (hard-wired)? A r,~v.nt.Yes ❑ No D. 7o your knowledge, is there a wvodsfove7 Make a Is n )Yea O No was It installed with a permitT ri D"f r(b D p "'r i M E 4'14 Yes No #E. Are you aware of whether a pest or dry rot, structural or 'Wtola house" inspection hes been ? ^sE Lyt d ~®f
x n 2 'z..,r` - I Yea No *F. Am you aware of any moisture problems in the structure (especially in the basernenf)T If yea, explain frequency and extant
s of problem on attached sheet
I Yes - No O. Am you aware of a sump pump on the property? f Pp t ' } F
t : It yes, attac or ex~tain on attached sheet.
'S CvFi
}x°s " - xr^ - eWsSignatu W Date '19 AM. 29~9~ REALTOR
el, e
1~r r £x C
z - err, - 5 s-F w1S.."c 5'@
2
x
d
j-_ f ly }T Y j i S,
~ d
vf"
1 r
gz,
41
L''-tr„^tY,t F4
,r ri h
r
0jP
r ~~7 .r ,x r f ~ •r~, .rYi 's-~a- E _
3
,'Y'V~.3•+.1` 3 c 'y,s - 'tstr~ Y I
9 e s a ,yt s~
P ti '
s },z.Er,b N roll, ,S" .<''"'sc °..';'+!la~ms,...,.- -=..f,+:^ _ S;G:"I«9%xy+ N{s;`°„:;r';~ 'r~ y' F".
y(}ui 4t
r' { J i `4-sY r s -
trS o f ki
p~*• ~ -w s- - - z -z _ , sly{
r&°s~'«
k ~,g77
t
Y ~6~h ,z- r r- T' f~'f'•Y 1 J
M1•
•
h, r #
yY - 1 - _ I,
M _ 11,,4 s xi, 3
-1. t= is w
3a3vp. `rn .3'Y3'"FC''~« L_... - - 3it
ar• S .'omjr;, } f - A -
a ® .
-''?;u- 'ro'c ~ $ _ _ - - `t -
M k"7i - - - --x -ti y
$ kF -Y- y x 2 - - y„4.,:to-aam.r .e..maasP.Sae.ts=a-.v.v,,.vaeSCr_-s.-,c.3'L.va..7..;a,.,+t. r
x 4,ri -
=h JUL- 9-96 TUE 9,38 RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 5036447400 P. 09 S
irk v a t k Yom.'
-~+_f'~c~' rte -x4 k- t^E '~,.-'/t z
s ,a ,
°t~k-, : rd fl\\oar
t3 S, raj T- aentroa• SELLER'S PROPERTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT a r'
r ,s i (NOT A WARRANTY)- a _
i-~ _ j so S. SYSTEMS AND FIXTURES 4- - r ? ' i i -1
rKt - s _ 1 gt Rktf~
- ^^r _ ea it Its iaiowirg systems or fixtures are Included in the purchase price, are they, to your knowledge, in good working order on the 1' ¢ ~ - „1111'
date this form is signed? t e;,
y s 61 Yes ❑ No A Electrical system, Including wiring, switches, outlets and service "ra '~r. ~_'-yc
.1" r
ea Yes O No B. Plumbing system, including pipes, faucets, fixtures and toilets , . ~y
as % Yes a No C. Not water lank - s i ~ era T -
t ' { - .a O Yes No D. Garbage disposal 7`,11 _
.,m } - ar ❑ Yes No E. Built-In range and oven - - j~ r`
" ea 13 Yes No F. Built-in dishwasher V F - { -
t® _
_ ea ❑ Yes No G. sump pump Isms r /-r t All IV br - e i~6W T- Ia., r'
e x.,. oo Yea No H. Healing and --Cf~`/ '/-G'RlVN ~ E u ts ~ d h r ~£,`I_ '11-, -e1111 -11",
s-{
{ cooling
- t' at Yes No 1. Searil +
j ' y sys ❑ Leased `f
1, I
n, a: i. COlIvIMO 'INTEREST ~ ,
-',a ~n m n.
i _ a1 ❑ Yes .0 No A Home Ownere' Association? Name of Association ~A ; , y -
e-- - as ❑ Yes >d No & fiegular periodic assessments: $ per t - i~ ,
- s a as ❑ Month 11 Year ❑ Other t r - 1. t - .11 r ea ❑ Yes No C. Are you aware of any pending special assessments? x -,~s.I R,
Ij .1
- or El Yes (S No D. Are you aware d any shared "common areas" or any (ant maintenance agreements (facilities such as wells, fences , pools. 5 - ~,,.~ryi~,
r 7 ee tennis courts, walkways or other areas co-owned In undivided interest with others)? - y
s _ as 8. GENERAL "i
1100 ❑ Yes 'N No 0. Are you aware of any settling, soil, standing water or drainage problems on the Property or in the Immediate area? s g fi ..a,`„.,_,a
- rot El Yes ~1 No 8. To your knowledge, does the wopertY contain fill? e=
p4 J , ~r
E•
$ a r oe Yes No C. Are you aware of any material damage Io the property or arty of the structure from fire, wind, floods, beach movements, - eh+ Via'" `
r $r t r earthquake, expansive snits or landslides? c r` - it ty '
nos Yes No D. To I,A, , °
7 nos ❑ Yes y' knowledge. Is the property in a designated flood plain? E. To your knowledge. is the property to a designated slide zonal , ~ , --3 - s ' _ "i
- - - roe ❑ Yes No F, qre you aware a any substances, materials or products that may be an emironmentai hazard such as, but rat limited lo, _ - i I l~r
_'r - - . for asbestos. formaldehyde, radon ~ - ...a--?,r : _
gas. lead based point, tool or chemical storage tanks, and contaminated soil or water on the _ t_r-, ' s -2t,r I-^?-.+~ x -
- -:_s~~ _ = roe subject Property? wi :~a; 6;,s"
11oe 6( Yes ❑ No G. Are you aware of any tanks or uncle ground storage tanks (a li I chemical, fuel, etc.) on the property? r n
i 1110 11 Yes U No H. To E - -
.rc,.y~, _
your knowledge, has the Property ever been used as an illegalgdrug manufacturing site? L -may,
e - t - zu
' 11 r 9. FULL DISCLOSURE BY SELLERS ktw £'a •r- z 1
j , 1 ra ❑ Yes ' No A Other corxfittons or defects g 1t s -'rN `
Are you swam of am other material defects affecting this property or its valve that a prospective buyer should know about? s x"' T•=:~,i`tTr, i
r - rs B. Verification n __-r~
r ie The foregoing answers and attached explanations (il any) are complete and Correct to the best of my/our knowledge and , 11 7
r I/we have received a copy hereof 1/Vye authorize art a /our L c t, ''"3' t
ny agents to deliver a copy of this disclosure statement to - rL.fi
a., r - " n other real estate licensees and all prospective buyers a the Property, ~
I -7 5 ni s?;pFrr P
3 k
£ ,r ig # u
* ttach a copy or explain on attached sheet t
-t ;vtk7 `S r j
r ' 11 to 11 lt~'M t?Date -_.3-_,19 f [ r it . j
£ Signature 3
: A.M. P~Ivi. F h ' ~ +w,- 'i r
_ s Print Name ` t -r ,yam
§ as / _ `
"t , . II rs ~nalure Name E is 1 _ .19 ze~: A.M. ~ p1vi - -,r d a
v
s ; tr a. BUYER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT f s
ry, .a A. As buyer(s), I/wa acknowledge the duty to pay diligent attention 1o any material defects which are known to metes or can be known by me/us
5
s < _ s - r '1 , try ulifzing diligent attention and observation, ; f ,"Q 4 (L
_ B- Each buyer acknowledges and understands that the disclosures set forth in this statement and In any amendments to this stafernenl are made only E r - x~ r
- s by the seder and are ml the refxeselAationa of any financial instilWlon that may haw made or may make a Man pertaining to the property, or that w *'r 5 yF
f~j z - ° . - a ~ may have or take a security
Interest in the property and no such financial Institution shall be bound by or have any liability with respect to a / n-a~ Y1/ _ `
h _ y z representation, m'tsrepresenlatbn, omission, error or Inaccuracy contained in another party's disclosure statement required by this section w dry s - ;W -
y e amendment to the disclosure statement. % kx
f,r - s' a C. Buyer (which term Includes all persons signing the 'buyer's acceptanco' Portion of this disclosure statement below) hereby acknowledges re celpl - t } g, ,a )
, 0 of a copy of this disclosure statement (inctudng attachments, if any beng seder's signature. _ - r t F -
i x 3 r'- .7 ) ari - - k - St
_ r DISCLOSURES CONTAINED IN THIS FORM ARE PROVIDED BY THE SELLER ON THE BASIS OF SELLER'S ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE PROPERTY AT r ~ ~ ~ f
i , i z THE TIME OF DISCLOSURE fle.. ABOVE narF nc ccr n ro.c crrue.r,.,- .r . '.I 1 7
> a 'st~+xr°N»a." 5r'ew.-"-wa. - ..rs • _ e e ->-~'a ; mr 4 ~g» ty j
L e
1 r-h -u - -sa - rl
- ` _ , t
,
~ , _ _ I 4 " - , , ~ ~,:!]J -~-,,"",`,v~. . r -'I y r e~ S
t rt ' - ,ham . - r:
E - - ~ ~ ~ " ~ L", : _ ~ , " _ _ ~ " - _~L 4 , - . ~ ' ~ . ~ ' I , , r . ~ _-'~-~'FV'-~, ~`,I--~,`,~- , '
{ F
- - Y- k - 4 } ,--sy S.t` t%'t i 'm 1 d
' -
r
r E '
_ h s r
sE, r s
{ .
h
" , : r : 0
Y.
~ I - I 1 4 ~ - I r 1 0 ~ , " T ~ ~ _ ~ - - 1
..ice.... _ Y._ ...~SCC - t -
r j,~snsx.- s'r 1 S ; y $ t,t _ '"".§-r x^t r
3 f~
En
1
a .s _ - - t- - -
& I ",f,', , ~ . - -N a.T.L.a`e'Tea - rr4 s - e~~.i t`+-~ a Owgi~ 3'~, t ice' e d f. ,,"fie E+
x
5Y~, wit f k- - i 5 _ _ - -eye? ."b ¢p -I? Y
t$..h~y1 ~p~i s+'y~'x'- £ _ '~1~;... T q r^ _ _ .A .~•:.s. r e...w r • - Y. "'.L° .2'
a X L, I., ~5} _ _ - w.„,uncr. ruu, nryc nUYtH tWVt LIVE BUSINESS DAYS FROM THE SELLER'S DELIVERY ~ ~ ~ k x+
T ~~i,'1 OF Ttil3 SELLER'S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT TO REVOKE YOUR OFFER BY DELIVERING YOUR SEPARATE SIGNED WRITTEN STATEMENT OF REVOCATION .'u = ° r' - ;
~ + TO 7HE SELLER UNLESS YOU WANE THIS RIGHT AT OR PRIOR TO ENTERING INTO A SALE AGREEMENT: BUYER HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT z - 1`~r , '-n
S OF A COPY OF TWS SELLER'S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ON DATE AND TIME NOTED BELOW. ~
~a `>Gerrj'rc cL Rcv`~tc `~jz%te GtE l~lfa~C 6uJ.°ze~atr~ce a C1Ce.tc)~fttt~z Y .,-A 51H
t,T
t vm. %,a5 Cam Cc9)i ttco?Gr fx~ s ~ !qp-g,
s , e
z a -
r
r = y
arzyr,
tF - Date ---•19 _ A.M. P.M. V'
-rr
.'`a 3 MN -95- are Point Name ~t i
A 'r Date ,te A.M. PM. ~ 'k ~
~ - ~ - Buyers Signature Point Name F 3 °s -
,
r C
I'll
✓T s gTsz~~.~ w r 10 -L +qa ~g ~ A copy of the foregoing Sellers Properly Discbsure statement was delivered to (Buyer) a ~""-~-t
-
€4 r,'- 1 _ ' on , 1 B ` ; A.M.; P.M. ❑ at (Place of delivery) , O by telefax that - 9 r
r-„ t • 4q kr . date and time to (buyers telefax number) ( ) - or ❑ (other delivery rretfad) t°E tea c - k- 4"~t'
- j # ~ t - a,, - NOTE- DELIVERY TO ANOTHER REAL ESTATE LICENSEE FOR DELIVERY TO BUYER 1S NOT SUFFICIENT! AlX---t, D - "
g REALTOR' Timm making delivery: . , rci - -
z~~
~ ^z rte-., " r„e By. - s 11
s.. 2 i44 .E-.T' i s ,F' 1
,2 N-111 Eil,
~`Sitws
l; ' its Y3 r, e
r - s - r
r Yet } < -t ^F.,
14
:
}0 k'. 4 a
- 5P1
~a~., i
Ai
v<
F.,
r ~e ~s
' _ j aE
''ea~x- mi
rt Lwt
_ R to f 1
3~ z E - _ ypT e 4t$r.~` t i
9 ~.y yw ins :r ,
a slrtr ~,ir5 )
i`~"rr ,h- SFr rs a t, 41 r E
7QM~' ~ }a xA f J r j .
s " y i
A,~'-1 _ 12111?' r yr~ i u.r `p' seV ~a H.
c "a„" r' - arar ° m = ¢.r.: " - W4;.17- ,t: .a.<' .t".3' :I~ .xv" , X' T, - u r ~ t ! - - r -
- ,kr,r a"i F' ? t t',,,,` - - „-i h' '?,w is •;,»z,?T
a'r fir i -Y t v - ~ ^3. M~iR
+~X .g - rYf _ r k
2"5 ri GN! rte, n 7
L4 I", , A .q ` W .i,.. < t try rc^+ r r
f2 ,,s, irs,s" y,i e } rr ` -*a' ~s f xa✓^ e 1 - 3}
r 4 ,
Y~ I ~ - i ~ , , , , ~ _ '4~ - '1~t,--~, ~,Lt~' 11 ,1 - 11 , , ~
ex r r'.r Y' ',~5~~ ~s 7
1 3yu" hyx` 5 y - t - -f "s Tr x•j is ( -
~~4 5
~tzcsi 20
"mom
WIN
gv~
{a W s r ~3 j try z' wx
x g~
5M ah' X.-AN JUL- 9 96 TUE 9.40 RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 5036447400 P.10
rx z
Min,
?
- s
0
PRoP,---a. . =-AT-/o~So-_qrJ=ld~6o
r } S .Vin/ WALNu 7- r-*pq~vv1j Gt?~ • ~I~z13. - 4` ~ 'Eli
f~RE ...C3aTN-`-RAN ~t'S ' ' .
Tf
9 1r{/E ....NAVE chECKEp-.. sctosurr
t a A5"a ?hF. G~rrs.T Q
M Fr
y
Mum
~7fl Y-0-fYl EN7
CO vL.-D 13_E.. lit-iy.g's as
pu t2 iGtYa yyLEd ~fR k
k
r .s
f
n „£r- # -
4 NIB
211 ME,
5, R
tr t` $ ~ _t
66 32
QRV
-Z UN- VIRV
't- - - - 3
z - I J # -
_ I g~ SU F-
VM-g WIN
f
\ x Ve
a
z4W
. 11
x I _ s
wh Boom UMM Tv
Go Mkn
k'W
A?n
~ealk rF: -
~Nz
ERB
son 0
14
WQJ
Aga
t Ss' u~," f=°,e,;:.~;.:~axz:°.ru~ :r _..:^.z•t ,f Y3'd,3'`"'t "3"• °"7 =~=::7F+~s a."',.. _
"L 0 -q
r- ca 2 ! r a r f `,Y z- ,
0`11, -1
r t
~y-M1~5~ N nyL ~ - l -f E, -
toy
i3
""5 OR
i
off
777-
RIM
OWN XZT, U.,
_ -s°+s~- s r _ _ i p - 5.u s ~s ,.~£zri..Y.~.:s..v..`'"L•
u.'~ z.
oil
~ -
wp,
JUL- 9-96 TUE 9: 40
RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 5036447400 P. 11
_ k3a o-~z t
_Vii
r` x F a OPT10N MONEY RECEIPMT
gj~,z{~ i
z yt~ k Received of Right Of Way Associates Inc. paid on behalf of the City of Tigard check number #38568
{ in the amount of $10.00 (Ten dollars) as option money to execute the Option Agreement for the sale~~,
and purchase of property at 10650 and 10660 SW Walnut, Tigard, Oregon 97223 the legal, -
RM-
description of which is metes and bounds. Also known as Tax Lot 1701 on Washington Counvf T. ax
Akk1 V0
z Assessor's Map: 2S, 1W, Section 3, Quarter Section AA.
Ott
4 ~_~f 4 ~ as~c{ ~t ~ 4
r 3 ~ r d Sl _ar u5.
#y
J hn A. Kramer Date
SAM!
a
e C. Kramer Dates
ova,
3 ~
✓ z - Y~
ts~ l
My"
GY S y`u -'.Sa'{.- -
owe., WO
to Ila
RMURA E
so Wjj
f
V go up
Syn
to 0. Am M j- v
10,
a,z ?-a , - - ` _ -~''rK 4 -7; ir' r :r _8,,.•-'i'+'# ~x*'ry ; i -r -'ter a.4rai,N°'• .`~i ~I
21 loss M A_
on Vf
Amoco
~q gg
akgi - tt as ti z" at -~1~,}'Z Lt
coo W,
r° x $ rk; .t f
eT..+.fy, p- 3'1 4 > i Y - - t-7 sz~.#,te t
3--
3s~ t
1t ~ r a Srk
A4 N
"r N~ . 15
AM' MMER
Rt,
I- Itc v3'M1{a-?a++,•.s. -
"biz xf,
JUL- 9-96 TUE 9:41 RIGHT OF WAY ASSOC IATES FAX NO. -5036447400 P. 12Y ~ -
M" A M., Z,2a
A
Theftdenbai z
Ai., LiC P'Yti --Y ' yC DES ~2 -
'ts":..~ltz Snyder REALTORS'
ga#
19313 S. W. PdcIfIG H Sune K
+4 e.r fA. z 5 Tigard. OR 97223
A t Y r FBus, ax (303) 6363" 121
9-1158 +`TS42
Pz,
<3~ July 8, 1996
Z, C
Nathan R. Pool
`~s4
Citv of Tieard t
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
t ti Tigard, Oregon 97223
I'M
-WV-,Q, RE: Option Agreement: 10650 and 10660 Walnut Street, Portland, or MR-
z Dear Mr. Pool -Dic
This letter will serve as notification that the cities Option Agreement with John A. Kramer
r ? and Jean C. Kramer is moved into first position effective as of today's date, July 8, 1996,
5 M 'Y
Attached please find a copy of the executed Release agreement acknowledged by Ed n
_ 0 Freeman, representing Sierra Pacific Development, terminating and releasing his agreement to purchase. The release agreement has also been acknowledged by the, ` n
Kramer's, indicating their acceptance of the termination of agreement.
7-a
i Sincerely, o-P 5~t ~
' N F- 'I,
011? -M
x i x14
c z s, _ ` Syless K. Barnes r
Sales Associate
c 9-
-hr
r r` , cc:Jeanette Young w€ t i ° QN,
PIN Branch Manager
5 a r
M" j f
AR,
4 7x ,rv '7 ,m`'r s
MqW
'21 R'
. ` h., r~ _ s:.s:>eT'.'x, ` °:_s.;`:~`.~:~'~i~; ~.`~;~,4dcc€` s, -r u~ ~=•4".'-. -a'~!. r `
Ilk"
G
}t•`''{ 1 -
ccf 4" '4-M t f E - 5 F - L 7 y'. p, j` ~kcCS»k f 1
, -n r ~r "7 a a k
x"s',c -4'rt f t d t i sf'Pr`r'ti .u'm K
rr"y r`s~ " 4 4 r _
i
F C fir" - F~'4s
r
.
' .
'-fits - .a rw - € - - °
Em -~'---'---:2-:--~~'-,, .
-t _
arc >
Ax-k. Rsr are y~,~ n.:~ua..«a.vas7.ac.,-iw.0..::;. w..t~,...d.`.._...=.v. m .ms.,.i.,,, ax zs''~-s ; - Y,
JUL- 9-96 TUE 9:42 RIGHT. OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 5036447400 P. 13 ~R
X1';8,{-~,~ d-~ er :d~~.>:4 1r:ia e'HUn r18FR0 6RPIICH 39-1156 TO 98863176 P.9Z x-'}- tL.y.,_ t _
{4
- S z P
a< C Ya 1 - - j',k * y, f 4 ryI -
m
'r
We agree to the following conditions regarding the Pr0Part3' at:
- , - 3 - -4 E
k s f ! E F'?P +
:j Legal Descriptiotl: I e ! ! ~i ~i
LI (k dZ dl"-"-c" rt~~ } a 5, Cast 3' ~a2iZt . t .
s Street Address: 1 1 (a~, /i 41-11
. 1 r!nl_I'll au~
,r g rr c .c =w. T.;~1:.,iilEG( (~7~7 ~•.`~,i'',:,~ Zk-_ n'A'l
1. We agree to rescind and terminate our agreement for the purchase and sale of the I "~'f. ° g , r.
r
1^x a'-s.l - t above property. z g~t;,'~-a.+~,,r a
2. We ag ee that all earnest moneys be delivered to: fit) E► L a~ F
yx ~ ~
, - , ~-'-i" , - M-~'
v - z _ 2_ Name k r- ~`E t
;1
-t N
Street 14 ' W ` I
N
'3 City State ZIP W A
l.t=
R a
' _ r S as full and final settlement, r x "
! a r~ r
a I We agree the Earnest Money Agreement dated the d ~ da of ~ ~i~ ~ w~
y =t, t'"kx,x a,r 'i
j 19 ~1~ Is canceled, and Buyer, Seller, real estate salesper-
zoker do hereby jointly and mutually release each other from any and all y
liability resulting from or arising out of said transaction tt o~ 95 g 1' - ~ -
$
' c
t ;Zeasor► for Release: ~a~ldddLhlrJ 't3 tn~I, t J "r .1
. . 1 r s - e _ F yt _
f @~
I Seller: Bt1Ver: ''fi
r
"I 1~
i r' s x . Yi+rtS3 c ry
t' ~s
- Da 3 q fv Date: 7 _~-9l- , r ry' 4' t
su k
a Broker., § F _
'mod 1-1 (a~LS~ rl _S ' f f k
- to i } Date: v M1 Ow ya r'~ " y °'.'t~t ;
+x {
} - ? - 4~F' .'"s :.tz a ,.mss. - °7: A _ - _ _ _ r 1 f; tt }.c "t4- F
c 7 r d .<< i 7 a-= p s . M - 'rc- - r -,+.xb
" xs - 2 # sa z - -.1
rk 1"- VY ( f r I
i ~ , .'~v U , C , I I t ~ " r . ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ " " A
:-t 1 a e t - c i geN s t f
r "-r s
P I , , " _ , ~ , - , - . , - ~ ~ - I I 1 . . , , - , - a -
Ell ~ ~ , ~ , L : . ~ . ~ ,w~".r',".V~,",
€
- - - ,1
s
t'
^ s -
°'.F` - s r w+'Z'§ } sf- - L • t+~zit+ _ - - - 3 } 3 ~ 4
-
ry-ex-~wrxuiPz
JUL- 9-96 TUE 9:42 RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 5036447400 P. 14
Mx,
RECPTPT OF NOTIFICATION iE MM
K
k.t
and a copy of the executed Release
Received of Right Of Way Associates Inc. a Notification Lew
Agreement from Syless Names.#~~
-t x idd <~'V "r'r ~ -7" 8L-26 Susan Anderson k
gg,
~
Fz, k i~ Y,1 ~
fZUM
t
E rz
, g k ft L
M, M
t _ g
f x E
M p,
e s
Y T - ~EtM~,
t , 4F k f
IWO
NXf
"M" -fs-
,~a.b*~r.~, r^ ?T-:N/PA7'drt5i171~0RAN~A#Nl.llt&Y~Pi' may.. -"'V"+.
.m Mw, rF a 'C
Mipi
f~
„r~,a_.t~`~r
M r r a r r f -i' ~ 'k v
t
,"M A
W1 t
y1' ti e' y
'1'Y'
p 6^' - d f Y' _ - l ,E W.t krh' z b
r r t f `4''+s» a} a i t- - 7 z F z's."'2 1
~+~."4,'`:w?"
~sl a'*"5ye: -}`-'i~ x
s
t Y',
AL
a' a a
,c
~.f
a.-_-" n .tea t _ _ni + ;4 s^-. - - v - _ - - - m° V ° -
, If -tltt" , ',I-, &T--.-T i- -~P,~~;4-Vt_'~-~ -,~~-~Z;',-;t7,`~-. 1Z` ~ ":,..I'. 11 I ~ , I. ~11--. ~ 'i,_' -Ti*'. - --,_!4.'T-_~~~ ~"_I'-i--,_T,,. ~:,~~-~_,,---,-~,-,T f - - .11 I _11-1 ~ -1 11 _'.1,1- i~-- I - I - ~ - -1
y ..w`".- 47 7 e aT~t sx z_ s - d v. TTcr s - f 1 i -
Z 49~ e 3 - x- f _ Z
I'M ~ T`x°--t .3'a S2,'a R ..f' -t' - - - h a y - ,w ~y°' -p
Y ¢ c s h
# 11 X, "'-KE
> Tz h r -
# AGENDA ITEM # - r
r r For Agenda of T11jy23. 1996
< r ~ } CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
x x- ~ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY -F c, - P , fi k
1-11 ~ LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD "x $ ~
m4'~ _ - t h - "S `"tam
c a -
a i - ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Architectural l Can.irae Contract for City Hall Expansion - ~ a a FT
.y ° , t , PREPARED BY: Greg errv DEPT HEAD OK CIT Y ADN4IN OK 141t~ Mg'zyh~
1~ ~T a
_ k ti is , ~ x -
$ ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
,~s f_
Nr n " - ` Shall the contract to provide architectural services for the expansion of City Hall be awarded? rr I a
z _w
fwyc STAFF RECOMMENDATION _ m ;
s That the contract be awarded to Hanson, Dunahugh, Nicholson Architects PC. e
s r
4 s INFORMATION SUMMARY r 4F
x This contract would provide the architectural services required for the expansion of City Hall at the Police kzf
epartment. Improvements are scheduled for construction during FY 96-97 and FY 97-98 and include the z _'4~ 1
dition of about 2900 square feet of office space and remodeling of about 2700 square feet of the existing ~ ~ 1, r
1-111 _Ii4
"I ~ , ~ _ . building. The staff recommendation was reached following interviews with three firms selected from five firms 4§ ~ Y
. - responding to a request for qualification. Bid figures and the firms are as follows:: ~ ~ ~ „ , yam;
I'P
rr}
~3 $36,750 Ingrim Architecture PC, Tigard Oregon . ~ { < na
` " 4 $33,400 Hanson, Dunahugn, Nicholson Architects PC, Portland Oregon 0, - a
~Y $33,870 Peck, Smiley, Ettlin Architects PC, Portland Oregon, - ~
a
The recommended firm, Hanson, Dunahugh, Nicholson, PC, has completed several projects for the City including ( p
- s`, remodeling of the Police Department building and Library addition. ; - ; i ,,T ~ k~
~ , 2" - 1 3- , ~ 4t'z,~-'s,
` OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDER-ED r'
,.s t
r ,f _ None 4 zy ~
*a fist _ ~ i 4
rout I , , a FISCAL NOTES ~ - ~ r f
ill ill ill
i-plc. a- _ a r Y'a`s,f .1'«.,
s~ ' 9 The project is funded as a General Capital Improvement Y -
,,d-~ - 11 I
t'y y- t a f- 3 ikiywiecYUm dx @ 5" _ .i
s Y fi c s
a `'„2' - - t ~ .m:,•+n... -+~rt ^u azvx »«`na" aca. s"°°- ' i'~„ 'Mn .*-"Y"',~,- a T - ..T'
s T' f
, '
'I , U , . . ~ J 01"I",
d„c fi st irlg - k t e_ f, x' - fi > ~1
f~ A i
- py i at i
t I ~ t t
j a ' { rah _ T
m'a'r'` 0' t '+5 - - L[
'SF5'y^ TYCy A` " - r b r X 7` F' 9 F
r r , [
L
~c-• „~~..F'_. _yc_~i...~... ...~_...r a j S "~~~n~il~^'^.^,. ._-...._....l~a ~i- r-~777
. " s _ . - - - - - -
- &
z
g'r, r } - r _ ,rj !7 -
~y2 - a - - - - - z s fir' -
,F a is
i h Jd M' - y - 9f A
i'2&- ~ ~ n - t - t.,t ate' ,l P_ -
h3~ v, V4 Agenda item No. k x kN- ? Yi rt k . 55 h a i. 1 ,f'," t r -
` i Meeting of `7/a3~Gt0 `
K i a ~s~ a
~ "X ' PROCLAMATION p r'
Lz j F
National Clown Week fi -
r
'f s August 1 - 7, 1996 l:`
- 3K,
:
,
{ a,
u f
K - 'i-- ~ Whereas, Clowns have delighted the hearts of young and old for f iT ~
hundreds of years; and x - ~ 5 -
s ` t y
ii
1 Whereas for en r I ~_r - ~
R , g e attons people au over the world have enjoyed ~,F
being entertained through the efforts of both professional and ~
amateur clowning; and r~x ' "F"s x, ,
Whereas, many clowns have joined together in organizations x-
x 3 t ta-M, V 11 d 'Fi
r throughout Oregon to elevate the art of clowning and to bring
rt laughter and cheer to people from all walks of life. r ,
. IN - - r i _ t t u, erg? a ea
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT 1, Mayor Jim tX4~~~~
s
Nicoti of the City of Tigard, Oregon, do hereby proclaim x ^
~
August 1 - 7, 1996, as ~ ;rte '
, 11 - ~ t
a
NATIONAL CLOWN WEEK ~ . -11
Z ~
LLLL
s In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of s e _ - R - - ~ -
the City of Tigard to be affixed. I },x
t
F $ - - t ai'i ars }yNA 1
.4 11
_ t Y ~5, .eta
: 7 Nicoll, ayor ;1 X' z-- j, a-
i of Ti and ' r A i
- 'y. ~
Attest: h s
£ It
~ r
g Catherine Wheatley a ~ '
r uy City Recorder ; 't a 11 -
a 3 - - ikirywidelptoclaimlclow .dw _ ? ~ t z+ t
= r - '`3'
tn' ~ 5 - 3 k
1J 45'
5 > a, 2 S za l
¢ t i - - , . - v
mow}' -z - ":Y 3 - ` - j 4' 'fi'r-
- - - t 'hit{ s
s`e'nt- _ _ _ r v~ 7l- a:
-t f _ _ C -
, ~ r ~ ; . I L 2
-ztjK r j d F a~ S
" - . t" f 1, ~ L ~ , ~ , , _ ',~:'r I .1. ~1;-'~ -"~""~"","i' p4Z ~ -
4y $ x t h f .I ~i
? v ]'r - Y - v63 S 4 A r
4"i K ' Fl
S
w` ,Y h ter' - -
!
~ Y
F +1 _ --tY
" I" -.1 ~ , - ~ , 21
i f,3 3 - \
Y 3
-