The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 06/18/1996 t 2 _x , al IV=q } r r t s3 t t' r 'i ~3i S: . 3:y? E',4~.~.11 A ~LSS ~ fl F t'I 1 _ v 1 r - r t I~ F lr~ I it [p ,I . ;~II~ ~S I 1 t7 r 1 ` i t 'iil S I i ~ J)11 YI , L r ~-dr , ..i . , . . '1 'f CJI ~ t II ~ ~ [I. 5. t~F - 1 1 I t{ r ri 3 ' 4 - ~ ~ '1 f JI• I 1 Y ~ 4 X71 . 1 IrYYp £ ' 1- . lam- , , I..,u a.. ~ ~ i..~ l...::....1 ~~..,.c.,ti a.J~. ...1...~:.._ . _ _ 5 ~ _....r .._y i •il 'a 'y _i 4r { 7~ 777777777=77 77777777.,777-77, - . > - , -F _ - b - .ci. r t - s ,y7 E -i hjS` s'-~ - - _ _ - _ { ill } YJ, 5 l _ J - .:e.wY+.eln'1vLtY3-YaxY.+cs.oa~+. .e....+amw.....o..-..w...A_L_,__',:._- _.c ......w . -F C .t -A _ Y f - Y ti.. Yk1 da - } v -t t L . SEA _ R ^ to- " ' i C -{.-r a ./\5 e 4 et a'-", 7 - _ Tit"rA~,i,?' +Gt i ti S"ii. . ~ -s f CITY OF TIGARD - - ~ # k " y~ p w 2 >,•r ~W[ L1~a8~~'+y Z, 6 cwrV PR~f { I P 5 5, r f 8c ti i1- v1 2: y c ' t i i ' is recommended that aF V, f PUBLIC NOTICE: Times noted are sst.-.:a:_ . it persons ~Y ~ interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in i sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. ~ ! ' I F 3 Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and'3 _ "it , , should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Q y , - 4~~L,~ Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - f . I rh, Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). ~ ~ r r-`~ s , 5 _ ~ - i p 4 :s Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: , . s , • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing - _ ' _ , F,,~_~:,, -1 impairments; and l3; ~~5 ; . r x • Qualified bilingual interpreters. - T J~~~ M s 4 r Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is I` x ~ T important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your ,x" ,.i ;~t [ 1> need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above: 639-4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - 3 yZ Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). ` j, ~ , I x ;4 SEE ATTACHED AGENDA Y F >z p it F F --J z s S-`1 rr t - i+ 2-_ m w p. h- E l' R. -x L"' a r & COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 1 f M. x, max,.-m - _ --^--,p- -N t ~';v, r: - 1 _ t- _ - ,g F, T5 ~a - - - f K A k f i a~' y 4`$ ~zj n ~ ' ~ ir t ~ ' , ~ I - , , t~.~ " s - - _ - i,' t r a rp✓ i 4 t } _ - S Cr SE .A } 7 / 4t L [kC _ PL X j - 3, p r, , , , - ~ I r I , - ~ I : . - ~ ` ) I -I L,7,~ f a'':t1 ,----'a^.+-^^^.~`•`~-- -c-n •^~c'--^ _ .rye-..-e.^^ r y r3 M I f .1 _w sy rte' - 4 W x. - - - a r a 3 ~ s e~f ~ . '~'.n-fe'e' 's.:~°'z 'ftsr 4 - a r s z'-y 'i Sy #'*a 4'° - t ..~~i2si.,.~~,~. d- fx Y* ; - - i r t # 's -i '~.i , 4`11''.'€ - 2y. _ ' - _ r r - - t * f`' - - W~ 3}' x j -,ms s \ 4-ny yid 1^ d rt - -f*'•ijM,,- 's 11 K ~ a AGENDA a x j 5 , z , { TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING , t 3 ` , Tune 18, 1996 E`: ~ ~ j YVz 2 . -.1' , l F7t 'max r ` 'M c x , cr - - n a-- 6:30 P.M. ft Svi.a 5. - A I. WORKSHOP MEETING Lk~ Y k 1.1 Call to Order -City Council at Local Contract Review Board ~ " r h ' ' t f , T = Roll Call - 5 x , k" W _ 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance - ' ~ W f Q_ , t 1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports f I J, 4r t 4 - 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda items kf` f e - 1 - 6:35 P.m. - d *i } a 2. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM COMMUNICATIONS P `kaav: x " 3 Citizen Involvement Team Representatives , rt ~ _ _'1 6:45 P.m. 3. UPDATE: COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING ~~ayF~, gi_ 4. I { c (CPAH) 11 U CPAH Executive Director Sheila Greenlaw-Fink r , - " r - LL z.,-zs ; x c - 7:05 p.m. tY S„i,,t? V y ' I 4. UPDATE: METRO 2040 h. - , f , r j Community Development Staff s ' ~ I'll .*r_-,''- yy~~ 7:20 P.m. irna zrj a,s c ice 3x1 . DISCUSSION: UNDERGROUND UTILITIES - tr i 5 L ~_I u , 11, }P r 6 t-- • Engineering Staff EL~b~,~-~.`.?r'`... ~ Y ;ys. 7:40 P.M. ';i v , 'r _ m,..; {r 6. DISCUSSION: ANNEXATION POLICY ~~t" Community Development Staff , . - t s ll rv E r- E f, 8:10 P.M. 0 ,,:.-~W+S o a 7. UPDAAdmin Administration Staff101"~ t t- 8:20 p.m. S u' fir' b r r S. UPDATE: CITY COUNCIL GOALS r r - . r Administration Staff ; -z__ ~ s - 8:40 p.m. K t ~xI ~,,r ~•,;rzn r, W , -P j 9. DISCUSSION: CHARTER AMENDMENTS ;s k` r i~ - . a 'r y - - • Administration Staff 'r' ~-r: .t~ ~ x. ~ fir- L+ ~..1 ~r~C r t z { a ~ 11 ar ~ ti y { S* s _ COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 18 1996 - PAGE 2 r , 4pi a,xa h~ s d a b~ "b y 4 4 J 3n 7j i "gy'p' h' .,r' 'y Aa j - ~,,I , ;a ; 4 ,tr. xd- av_ -'^^'°°~cnre~rfr Y., - s:a;2 x m+s.er c'e § x z ~ 1- .i1 a - # _ ,.Y r _"%!C r r x fi # ~F i ~ , ~j 4 .s ~a -:t ' _ t 3 X45 - 11 Y 4 Iz O, Ma} i ~ S ~ s~ a rM '~~`,'2'k Zt e 1 f t,a s - 1 - , s 3r - 'ta. A E Ni s T i 'gas r _ zn.'k" y .`t _ x _ r - - - r, k'' - z4 " r' -a.. , , F i 4 k - fy i t } C .'Iii- } 3"\[ Y € ba" 4 y 2 ~l,ur, .<.^F'-xN-~•F.yn '3 t'"P t - _ X.' 4 "'S. fe F 97 -91-ME" [Sri vY ` s Wyk 2 e~ ~'4.r kk~3 rake _ _ x r Jy s~q .t3-~a n~ ~~"a~ ~s rt w Y - z ~t v Y 9:IsP.M. n i s ' 10. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 9:25 P.M. ; ' r ~r ab g Y i SO: ? s 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION! The Tigard City Council will 90 1=0 Executive p x i Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), 8z (h) to d _ discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. This Executive Session is being held under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), at (h). As you are aware, all discussions g~. r v } within this session are confidential, therefore nothin from this meetin st-, a r g g 4r may be disclosed by those present. Representatives of the news media areN allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any informations ? i ' discussed during this session., g al k w3 ~ r f - a- ` - i 9:45 P.M. 12. ADJOURNMENT ~e, sr jar 4 ,n v cca0618.96 t n "Ok r xy ° -,Z N ° t 'z r t :j COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 3 C a ca ~ t k _ ' a t 4.~ r ro --:r t }-tA.t y } ? # .n" ~t r3 ~`a - K ^^'^µm ra;s^cs.:uzm, a.,,,.,v...m,- -777777- .13 y - r f n 5,1 J{ h .M tT _ ~S1- - 1 it +S 4_ Y k ~ ~y , l , A - i _ u.-_ ~-..._:.~._r,t.._t, , _.i ut-.___ _':.~3 r_ .w r. r... ~ .L r_ ~L_ v r.! ~__.c.'__._i.,.. ' z s _ - 'l' 4 Yay} L.y H _ _ _ x r t x~isr y iii -~hs,F-'e'.Y:f'j:~e'' ) .t e'„ j. S {,y,+~•.yp"+`+ ` e I yl~-~sy.~,"'y`¢m qhl ~w r er x-t _._.-»~-....w.v -~a'. _'>.~w:....- - ...,..r,: -__.,._n.-._..~.._-,..._ - M5J 5 'I Y r ` t $ ~~4 t- - Agenda Item No. 3, - ' sai1 ?y, kx 5, n W'V~144i~- Ili € ~q - t_'J7'7s r--7- t Meeting of A t* f x *f spit nom' -"f`„ s - f - 't ° dV _ -r.{rk y, 1 -t -G F t3kt Ti- < 3 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL _ "r k WORKSHOP MEETING "3 N'-M- ~ 11 c _r € - MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 18, 1996 " ~ Meeting was called to order at 6:44 p.m. by Mayor Jim Nicoli ~ ",M ~ ~ ~ i~~ i, ' 117 t 1. WORKSHOP MEETING 3%~ - 1.1 Call to Order -City Council & Local Contract Review Board - -'Iqj n ~ . 1.2 Roll Call F ~ -F_y X1,4" - 1-11 I. ~ - Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli; Councilors Paul Hunt, Brian Moore, - x IT, Bob Rohlf, and Ken Scheckla. Staff present: City Administrator BillxF % Monahan; Acting City Engineer Greg Berry; Legal Counsel Jim _ ~ ~x i 7 Coleman; Community Development Director Jim Hendryx; Administrative , Analyst Loreen Mills; Assistant to the City Administrator Liz Newton; City r r r Recorder Catherine Wheatley; Human Resources Director Sandy t " ~ Zodrow.fr , Citizen Involvement Team (CIT) Facilitators & Resource Staff Team #&3 q Members present: Brian Wagner, South CIT. i ~ ' 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance ~k ~ f r F 1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports `1 , - 11 # s Councilor Hunt reported that last week he attended a meeting with the 11 group of citizens concerned about Cook Park (whom Brian Wagner had r L'.,~ f mentioned at the last Council meeting). He said that it was a cordial t t meeting and that the primary concern was about environmental issues ~~s~~Fh ;s f and whether or not the consultant would be cautious about the wetlands , ~ r ~ and environmental restrictions. C I r - - f _ q, w t --'Y7'{w` Sts 3 G - Councilor Hunt stated that this group requested to put four E[~~~ 11 ~i- r , ' ,.".1A r representatives on the Steering Committee but when they understood I - r that the other interest groups only had two representatives each, they were willing to do the same; the two representatives appointed were Brian Wagner and Mark Vossler. He said that Mr. Vossler commented t r~te~ ! after the Steering Committee meeting this morning (when they reviewed N s .-,.Z the RFP), that if their group had been in on the drafting of the RFP, a lot ` E 5 ? , of their concerns would have been alleviated. s ` qk_ { d - f a '4s 7' S v _ _ ,r t - y. .rS. pj V - t - us F.w r- - - i s }L ~~N~~!'.-"~"~ , ~ ~ " - , I- -1 - - ' - - ' I ` ~ ~ - - j t i' . , ~ x' t. fin- , r r rt j„ v 9 # ` I aVV"'v+~~^'iri~T.] - - _ . - e ^.'^o/+Tr4~'Y _`°-'Je-t ki ..r a3`Ifi•T Tl^91~T -.t_.. .a . s . -.3. ..,.a-~ _ .Y.t r u' _«_.~.i.. f~c.y',~v._...c_.,. ._._i .._--.L"' :i 1. _1_ L--_. ..~_uti - 3.. ,x_-, - h y, Y 4C s k r 6 C ,11 2 _ a. cr«a ?iW - x t r' - - ,4, ' - ` , r±' - _ - - - - a f _ s x j_ 3T k V p V C ~;.i J - ---F - - 4 '4 a 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items ' P ~ Councilor Rohlf expressed his appreciation for the extra time and effort r : , 'i the City staff put into the Balloon Festival last weekend. Mr. Monahan I a t_ F . . , ® noted that they received only positive comments on the efforts of police, ? public works and administrative staff. lA A: r 2. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM COMMUNICATIONS 1 I'll I V - Y Brian Wagner, South CIT, reported that people commented on two issues at t ~j the South CIT meeting. The first was the Waverly Estates parking conflicts Z, { associated with athletic events at Tigard High School. He reviewed the _ ~ : a f- problem of a hnlP in the fence on the east end ihat encouraged people to park 1 % x' i t 1: # h 1 - -10 1 in the neighborhood and then walk to the fields. The result has been double s , t r parking in the Waverly neighborhood and blocked access. Other problems kgu~Y T M . F included arguments, litter problems and students going to the park when they , < r probably should be in school. He said that a neighbor called Tigard High si J l School but got little response. He noted that the curb on the east end of the ~ _4 _ neighborhood was painted red for fire code access. " ~ "f ~ _ rz s Mr. Wagner stated that police officers asked the neighbors to call them when a G g` problem occurred. Another point raised was who was responsible for the fAx4 ' fence; the school district said the developer put it up and that they had no r ~ a~.k. , I responsibility to maintain it. One neighbor liked the hole in the fence. i s r ~k i~r ~~x~ 4 . Liz Newton, Assistant to the Administrator, confirmed that she would et x pta2F - n~ , g z ~ ' ..i back with the neighbors interested in finding solutions after she talked with ' 3 Russ Joki. ~ r ~ r Y~ Mr. Wagner commented that the people had been concerned that development of Cook Park would change the nature of the park; they have since come to --t _ understand that the 28 acres of athletic fields slated for development included , s t , , ; r wetlands. He concurred that the problem of a lack of representation on the ` "t 0 Steering Committee from the neighborhood and those concerned about the " _ - P A _"L ' natural values of the park has been resolved. E M~ g ~.e c 1~ t, Mr. Wagner listed the neighbors' concerns as traffic, noise, lighting, changing ` , 3 the view of the park, private groups controlling access to a public facility, public i " ~ ~ F'= r input coming in to the process too late after the RFP and master plan, and theL i , lack of a complete City of Tigard parks master plan (resulting in piecemeal t,. r j parks planning). r.'. . -11 g _ 9 t. 4 Mayor Nicoli commented that there was a certain level of tolerance expected ' from a neighborhood with regard to problems generated by public facilities. He `k` t -4 noted that pleasing one group of people could result in action detrimental to a, , f I et 4, `YYtF. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 2 r _ 'I a 1- ? F FsF• L?K(+(' (x- S,y-". - _}r'agy@" f 3 - X-'` - - ✓ f g L Y 1 - h- ¢bo' } k :•v } T }l 12 ~11~`~','~~ -1 " , , ~ ~r , ~ , ~ : , " " , D , , , ~ - , - - " , , , ~ , - , _1 ' , r - ~L, 6 , , " - - M ~,•.-...-a. ~c-~.~.... ~ ,t._ _ _r. ~.i -v.-s-ter. - ~ .i -_i~.4--..L - " , - - k { J F, Flo , sj~s 1,',~.*Z,',',',-.. - ~ ~ ; ~ , - t ~ s 4a"3 x s r r .a~, - s a fi . h-. r 7 _ _ _ - -,Y =k.. S • 'i. - - f S Y~ M i _ - - F - - _ ter. _ 4 - i , f h i r +m ~ others, such as closing the fence would block off neighborhood access to the ~ ,4 I - high school track. He noted that Waverly was unique as a subdivision ; ~ j, 4 h 4 } x surrounded on three sides by public areas and that perhaps some special g r # &a, x considerations could be reviewed. r - 11 kF 3 - , Councilor Hunt stated that the people knew the high school was there when & ~2` ~ p ' r they purchased property in Waverly. He said that the only concern raised to } him at the meeting was a concern that if a band shell was built that it face the ? .1 river, not the neighborhood. 'S ` ~ _ 2 -r ,K,- Councilor Scheckla concurred with Councilor Hunt's comments. The people g ,--,--1,--,M, t knew what they were getting into when they bought property there. He said _ L ~ r s that he didn't think that they could alleviate the problems without creating more _ ~ x h~ `2` } ri problems in the long run. ` , W, x W ' s Y' Councilor Moore asked what the zoning was south of the development. Mr. ° > r t w n , Hend x said that the Gray " r ryproperty was zoned R-12 and designated as an 4 -T r open space in the Plan; the Thomas property was zoned "County residential." & ~ - ~ , . F - Mayor Nicoli noted that before the high school split (by adding Tualatin High), ~I' ~ _ s fi ' the City stepped in to help with the problem of high school students parking in ~r #W l ~ ' IR% neighboring-- He agreed the City should monitor what occurs in , r^. F k A"-T,215 - # the Waverly neighborhood because of the special circumstances. r 3 , _1 r t Mr. Wagner stated that he would take back the message of tolerance to the 1 , M11 ' 11 CIT but asked if Ms. Newton could help work on solutions. " 11 ry r y Mayor Nicoli said that he thought that the school district would help if they . - 1r knew students were leaving the school grounds out the back way. He noted that they cooperated with the developer by allowing the fence. Councilor Hunt sr ~ z, - suggested having the School Resource Officer assigned to the high school check out the problem. ' ~y,n~ u - ~g 1, 3. UPDATE: COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING (CPAH)? City Administrator Bill Monahan introduced Sheila Greenlaw Fink, ,T,-,t e, r Executive Director of CPAH. cI ~ `w s k-~ . ' Ms. Fink introduced Topaz Faulkner, Executive Director of Tualatin Valley - ' ,~T s" , Housing Partners, a county wide community development organization whose y' first project was Hawthorne Villas in Tigard. Ms. Faulkner distributed some ¢ M a materials on her organization and the Hawthorne Villa project. Ms. Fink also k,' ~ , x introduced Sam Galbreath, CPAH Development Controller, who has helped ~ ` y them structure their first project at Tiffany Court. k ; t' i r i £g r V t r.. 11 >s 5-- CITY COUNCIL MEETING MIN[TTES - JLNE ifi, 1996 - PAGE 3 I~i~ A. s _ _ u, -111 . , h ~ 11 S _-a~. 'z ya i F - h ti qK, s { ar t mks r "i w - '1 } t _ t - , 1 j ` ~ :1 7' 'r ' ' ? ~ ' * 'J ~ - . ~ ~ . ~ , - -..r- - ~ . ~ ~ ~-:":.'--:-,-7-,~-,~ ~ : - . ~~4 , ~ . -r, , , - r , , : _ , ' ' , , , - r ~ - - I ~ ug r ~ ~ - ~5 - . ti - . w _ " . f-~-T--- .F 3.`i 'V _ sk,'1 _§1_' 9 'f 1 a- _ 0 ~X5 N' i k`" -I - fa--~. s 4 --S iv.,'5,'d t5 1 ....-.........._e.a.. _.......-"AW:.1. .___e....._ -S^-1 'Ck! - .frt. , ' ti 3 L 1`- 4?f? - - # f, S-Y-rti Ms. Fink reported that negotiations with the owner of Tiffany Court improved s~ t when the owner realized that his price was unrealistic for the market. She said that at the same time as their negotiations on Tiffany Court, Villa La Paz, - another troubled project needing rehabilitation, came up; they secured an j option for Villa La Paz and have decided that they would like to do both 5 p projects. She noted that they had an excellent development team and a :'--i s- community-based board committed to putting together the resources needed to r C a Ms. Fink advised the key assistance needed from the City included tax t= ` ins . i5D1_ abatement and reduced fees. This would help to persuade lenders and r , 5 R issuers that this was acommunity-supported project. s ` 3 y ; n > , r k..' U JZ r v - Ms. Fink reviewed the options for providing tax abatement and stated that they f N W S " preferred a policy-based approach as opposed to an individual-project F " I - $ ` approach. She referred to the question and answer sheet they put together to f fY p~ F ` L address concerns.& Mayor Nicoli asked if CPAH hoped to get the other local jurisdictions ~ ' ' 3 r y participating in tax abatement in addition to the City. Mr. Fink said yes. Ms. ; 1 ,T Faulkner said that they have approached Washington County on this issue and ' s »r r provided them with information on the benefits of this type of project for the I. f # X. r .6 community and Washington County. Y x it _ ; Mr. Monahan reviewed Finance Director Wayne Lowry's memo on this matter. s`1.1 ` s r (See Council packet for a copy of this memorandum.) The assessed valuation :i I~ 6 of Villa La Paz was $2.4 million dollars with a tax liability of $33,000 (of which Tigard received $5,400 or 16% of the total tax base); Tiffany Court's £ . assessment was $2.7 million with a tax bill of $37,800 (of which Tigard ' 4 o, -e t, - received $6,000). He explained that if 51% of the taxing jurisdictions agreed to N abate their tax, then the entire amount was abated by law. _ } . - s x L ; Mr. Monahan said that the players were City of Tigard (16%), Tigard-Tualatin P" School District (48/0), Fire District (12/0), Washington County (1210), Others n F ~ F 12% He noted that if the school district didn't agree to abate taxes, tax l , 1 abatement probably wouldn't happen. He stated that impact on Tigard f, r j taxpayers if both projects were approved for abatement was four tenths of a tx_ s : percent per $1000 or .42 per year on a $100,000 home. ( x ' ~ 4 k ~ e~ In response to a comment from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Monahan spoke to the , . z , ~ issue of balancing abating the taxes with the benefit to the community in terms - ~ s of reduced police time spent in handling calls for assistance. He stressed the xr importance of community policing. { s B v - s r I CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 4 s X 4 - 1 i - ,.r I,- 0 1-1 . - - f k, f} t `1E r C {4 n t 2 j y E , d + 3 z t ;j w F, h , E , i , ' ' ; : L - : ' _ ~ L~ L 1 ~ ' . ~ ~ ~ : L ~ ~j ' , , , , " I I - , ~ , , " ~r ~ T . L__. - _-.-Y..- Z...."v.2.~.r _.1._,.-_. . r~ s- a } MUM% - , ~ - ~ , - I Na > -yM x N ,~~t~. Z a V:TR y- t p z.r - g r, t f Z's ~ d w efi* _ - - . - - c.~n:.e.,....._......._-.._.,_,.c..z..+'_t1..<++....r.....-~..__.__ .L ---~..._-_.....r_.._:_ • v + r i 4. " "k - - _ t _ v 2 ~ , Mayor Nicoll stated that he favored CPAH's request. He noted that Tigard was x k struggling to meet the Metro densities and that Metro encouraged involvement Y i - ` in projects such as this. He said that the dollar amount to the City was small ' but had a large return of benefit. F Councilor Hunt stated that he was 100% for the request but asked why they F .r:_ x ~ a - were paying $5 million for a property that sold for $3 million in recent years. :i 11 1 Ms. Fink said that the numbers included a significant amount of rehabilitation. 4` Ms. Fink emphasized that they needed strong support from the City in order to t ~ `i - ,RW } , s secure a bond issue and funding commitment. She said that the reduction in ~ - rent of $34 per month per tenant if 100% tax abatement was approved was ~ s critical to the success of the project. Councilor Hunt asked if Tigard could abate its percentage of taxes if 51% did h, ; x f not approve the request for abatement. Mr. Monahan said yes. He confirmed S ~ . v a to Mayor Nicoli that the City did not lose any taxes through this; it simply _ gti3; ' I s - reapportioned them. yvt + I r. Councilor Rohif raised the issue of Measure 5. Mr. Hendryx noted that the 63 r k' 4~"~ " - _ i Council might not be able to shift the tax burden based on where they were w - ' q~ ~ni ^ , under Measure 5 currently. Ms. Fink agreed that they needed to look closely ~ ~ ~ #Zl f at where Tigard fell in terms of the tax levies. She noted that Portland didn't s „ I feel that it could shift the burden under Measure 5 but because of escalating p { property values, it could generate the revenue it needed to operate. Councilor 4 ' "x Rohif commented that they needed to discuss policy on whether they City , ' r should shift the tax or absorb it. a Mayor Nicoli raised the issue of the $1.5 million in upgrades. He commented - - = ' that gutting units or adding on units invoked costly ADA requirements. Ms. ~ a_ - Fink said that they had addressed that significant challenge with the architect ` j and contractor looking at ways to modify the ground level units to meet federal k j uidelines. , a 9 .i j- t - r r N x tt rz,PC I Councilor Hunt complimented them on their presentation of written materials. r ' & f=ti f~k ` Mr. Monahan noted that the fees depended on what the actual construction M M n r i would be. He raised the issue of the need for a Comprehensive Plan change £ because the development was anon-conforming use. He noted that the r 341 4 ! ~ ' ~ ' Council could not make a commitment to a Comprehensive Plan amendment - . ;,Q F because they must go through the land use process objectively. ~ 4 4 4 r` The Council discussed the issue of nonconforming use. Mr. Hendryx n` ~ explained that all three projects were in zones that didn't allow the current density. Ms. Faulkner said that the issue of nonconformance was critical to v I f ,1 5 I. ' 4 ' CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 5 2' , k ~ } f v u Z's S_ t } Y ill i r Y Yh V 'ii r - x - - t - e{ t - - - t l l §C 4 iz a ',c t - - - ' s } t R&, .t 'f F - _ - _ t .t , , r - - h 'rl a _ _ b r _j 5 S J , E , - ~ _r IF Z. ~ M1 ~3 -•~z+-r`.~.3A!~'~'. Y`om' 'f35` f~• "i`,~ -S, ,t_ 3 C$ t -x '-rc~'s' W'tfuV x.p a1 } C y . 1 f - _ 4, _ - - - kF ~l _ _ _ _ t f i 2p *'4 iA'. i - i y~ tri 3 d y'4`4 k--.f- .i' - ._..4.s .be~>sa~....w....w e..~_.._.... - - _ } t; .Y 1, f y- S F n 1 f 1 j I-, - F 7 t3 ,F the financing of their project; the financing was contingent upon getting the zoning changed from R-12 to R-25. Mr. Hendryx stated that while it was i - 4 1' important for staff and the Council to understand the predicament the community development a pora"aons were in, they had to go through the Y ` , _ r i j public involvement process. zvr t + ® e f Mayor Nicoll asked if the issue of densities had to be resolved before the ` project could move forward, noting that it was a lengthy process. Ms. Faulkner F` stated that she had to start the process immediately because the issue of fire - was raised by the insurer. Mr. Galbreath said that CPAH was not that far P ~ J } a ® ~I along but that it could become an issue. He said that they have dealt with t - - other projects with a nonconforming use that did not require a zone change as a -~x,'s a condition of final financing. j4 { Ms. Fink stated that they were asking the City if they were willing to be involved in discussions and tend moral support. Mr. Monahan reiterated his r ' caution regarding the land use process and Council's inability to indicate 'M , t whether or not they approved of the requested change. Mayor Nicoll noted that they could make statements of support on any issue other than the zoning `s , , issue. ] Yp 4 Y 3 Mr. Galbreath commented that the support of the City was very important in ' ks~~C~~ garnering support from other jurisdictions and lenders. He reassured Councilor AT s I I Rohlf that they did not risk failure by taking on two projects instead of one y h u x S ~ ~A , i because they would not move forward unless all the pieces were in place. Ms. ' ' - { x{ ~ s~ , 3 7 Fink noted the expertise and experience of their development team in handling - r , t r projects of this type and size in the Metro area. r fit' " x' Councilor Rohlf commented that since they did not know how much the tax 7-a , 4~ ' ' and service fee abatements would be, it was like asking the City for a blank = ~ , check in supporting them. Mr. Galbreath stated that they would never ask the , 4 - City to do more than what they have laid the groundwork for right now; the - ° x c § requests for land use change and tax abatement should be handled according a , to the law and the established procedures. He noted that their financing F F +t partners (Key Bank and Northwest Natural Gas) were equity investors rather than lenders and would took very closely at those same issues in order to r i "O insure the best return on their investment. c, tF ; r - The Council discussed the financing. Mr. Monahan said that Council could j j A f { F$ , I make a decision on the tax exemption each year while Mr. Galbreath pointed,: - s out that the financing structure was built around the exemption. Mr. Galbreath j r - ~ { stated that program they were working with was "risk share" in which the - 5 t federal government and the state each guaranteed a portion of the 30-year M Q bond. , kF F YAi i ~i t 4 S - r1- W ` ! 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 6 } V.. F` ,J 6;, R x s- 1 p Y "k ,v t} C r - x , r i- t 4 _ t I A t 1 5 { # s s 5 - f $ - > 1 s t - 3 - - - .I' , , r ms's r 1 'i - ~ L .t_rv.x.tii .x.__ - i. - - ~k t .r.. _ -4- - . ,r ._..i ,r _ r__ . .t. _ „s.. fi, { r g a as 3 - t✓rY - SL - .`t - 0,- V -_6g-,'~, .~,A "t M , 'j ° t,,J -c 4'' - a _v_.. i 351 $ \ w :r q ✓r `t - - - e > ? t `i: Jeannette Sander President of the Board, commented that I-:nra-i cl,nrnn.rF , of fi their project was a primary consideration in getting support from the state and others. J ' k The Council agreed by consensus to support the request. r 4. UPDATE: METRO 2040 u h Mr. Hendryx reviewed Council's direction for staff to send a detailed letter to . MPAC regarding concerns with the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. He said that MPAC was evaluating the Plan thoroughly because of all s n - X the comments received from jurisdictions. After this review, the Plan would go , -i, out again for comment. He noted that a challenge for staff would be to track . ~ _ S 5 their comments to see if the various drafts incorporated them. ~ f " Mayor Nicoli complimented staff on the letter. He noted that Tigard submitted t - , _ ~k t the most comments of any jurisdiction in the Metro area. MPAC accepted over t r m - 50% of these comments. Councilor Hunt asked if the other jurisdictions' " t as " s comments had been as direct and detailed as Tigard's. Mr. Hendryx said that I Hillsboro provided a detailed submittal but that the others' submittals were r ~ " - more philosophic in nature. s { Mr. Hendryx said that staff would continue to monitor this issue and bring back 1 4- - updates to Council as needed. He commented that staff has invited the x. ~ ~ I Y 4i`T Y}l i Planning Commission to attend the work sessions on this issue but that they ~ _ f ' ti r have focused mainly on providing information to Council. He noted the t3 W'~ , 11 disappointing citizen involvement at the CIT meetings. , F§ 1cs I Councilor Rohif suggested making Jon Kvistad aware of Tigard's concerns ,~v'-~ ~ r k - prior to the issue reaching the Metro Council, noting several key issues. Mr. M y F. , , Hendryx commented that the issues raised at MPAC would also be raised at K ~a3, Metro Council. a ~ 5. DISCUSSION: UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ~ Acting City Engineer Greg Berry noted that the single remaining issue in the t' ti a ordinance mentioned in the memo from the City Attorney's office was whether ` ` + g~ or not the funds collected for undergrounding should be spent in the district in f f„ a a which they were collected. The City Attorney recommended spending the a i~, , money in the immediate area in which it was collected, as the ordinance was ' r ~ _ j currently proposed. y, f 4 F The Council discussed the issue. Mayor Nicoli noted the argument that if they ~r M. left the money in separate accounts, they would not have enough money in j - any one account to start undergrounding. Councilor Hunt stated that he would ' a, i.. , ; K c CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 7 a r t r rr° A d, F ~y 4 1 i h - FE'S-,.S\ h k - - . :H 3 9 P - _ 1 u f j Y t' - f C f L [L~ t , , - , t tr , - - - ~ " ~ " .111.1~ -I " 11 ~ ~V r < - - i 3 1 r' _ -'I r t tt" n n - a i, Y ry1 - - 3 - - = fi - - 4 - E - , I , - - - - , ~ ~ : ~ , : ~ : ~ , , , - , - ~ , I - - : ~71 . ~ I I . I " . ; ~ - ~ ~ , , - -1.1 1, i - I "I a a t - 7 i r y-a -A`,, - F 5 - S l,1 - kr,~x t { v i r k F , ~ ~7~ - vote against spending by district because of the amount of bookkeepi~ ~g it x ; ' ~ t generated and the lack of sufficient funds to do anything by district; he said _ ~?N that he supported putting everything into one account. fi z; Councilor Rohlf commented that the City should develop an undergrounding - { g ♦Y bi a 1,7--l-11, plan to use the money in the best way possible. He noted that the City often ` § x{: spent money in one area that was collected in another. He said it was a waste ` ~ ' of tax dollars to do nothing. Mayor Nicoli concurred and spoke to allowing the ~ k ~t, r .x Council to use its judgment for funding projects within the City similar to the z process used for purchasing parks. Councilor Scheckla stated that he would a X n support that position also. `s. , r 7 fr sz`"~~n Councilor Moore concurred with the concerns expressed by the other , {F*. Councilors. He added that the $95,000 currently collected would only pay for h ' ' e` 4 #,x , 1,000 to 1,500 feet of underground utilities. ~j Mr. Monahan reviewed that the Council direction was for staff to come back with the ordinance changed to place the funds into one fund. Expenditures for underground utility priorities will be reviewed annually. 1 1 - I > Mayor Nicoli recessed the meeting at 8:10 p.m. for a break. Councilor Moore" x left the meeting. z' z~ > Mayor Nicoll reconvened the meeting at 8:30 p.m. x 'x'xs~c 3'- - 1 ki, $ Sk , ` pz„ a A. x#'' s` k j 6. DISCUSSION: ANNEXATION POLICY ~ ~ _ ; ~ Catherine Tibbetts, 12235 SW James, reported on the sewage problems - ;~s created in her neighborhood as a result of the winter storms. She described~~ the unsanitary conditions existing on the three streets (Alberta, James and Marion) off 121st. She said that most people were interested in connecting to = 'r the City sewer. r`,r.aC E F w Mayor Nicoli noted that if the area annexed into the City, then they became hW,--z,%,-A`2,,,1!'- ~ - a eligible for funding available from the City to bring sewers into the ? neighborhood; however, that money had to be repaid to the City. Acting City -ti4 r a Engineer Greg Berry said that he estimated $8000 to $10,000 per property to I~ ' - r connect to the sewer. Ms. Tibbetts said that most people with whom she has -a - 1- I ~ - talked were aware that they would have to pay to get sewer but that they didn't ' ; know how much it would be. t , (E ' ~ h, Mr. Monahan stated that the policy question before the Council tonight was did f:. y~ they want to continue allowing annexations individually or did they want to goy r y P t " t a , $ for the entire area at once. Mayor Nicoli stated that he favored bringing in h w a Y developed neighborhoods but leaving out the large undeveloped parcels until -,J ~ { r - CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 8 .r, C s x `Y ~ ay - r a s 3 r F [ ' ;t i 1 afm4. :i~ = - --k 3"i. v R - - - 1' P /_'-t F , ".,r , , ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ - . ~ ~L '1~ I ~ : -'-I'- ~ " . _ _ . 'I,- J_. ' 1'13" , I , I , IL , , ~ -_,-"-~"-,-";.'J,~,,~ , , - - , r , - , ~ - 2 Y _ t- x n I - j } - - - `i r & ' - - - - - - .C f - i t t - ~'-y z - K _ ~ ' y 1 t 1 11'1':~', E I I I I ~ ~ r~, I ~k r r y , I . . __~~'._--,1_. L~ 1__L 14 ~ x - rsy r t - ta,, y' - - - - -J t - -35 - x 6 - - - - 5 - } Y ~ \ s y i~ 3 t e a they reached 80% buildout (he cited the new IGA under negotiation with 4 ` lie, _ Washington County). " Y x - f Councilor Hunt comrinan.od that simply annexing to the City did not guarantee = the neighborhood that the City would put in a sewer system. Mr. Monahan raised the issue of how close the sewer line currently was to the ~MnF 4 y= f properties under discussion. Mr. Berry said that the line was at Walnut and 121st; it was a distant connection. He confirmed that the $8,000 to $10,000 ~a per property estimate assumed that everyone connected on the line as it was ~s constructed. Mr. Monahan asked if they were discussing annexation of all the properties that could connect along 121st or were they discussing a cherry-stem annexation to the failing area with the expectation that the other properties s & would annex later on to get sewer. Mr. Hendryx commented that different k standards came into play if an island annexation was for health-hazard reasons or property-owner initiated; he said that a cherry-stem annexation to s=gym the development that wanted to annex was most likely. , vi__~ Va Councilor Hunt commented that he was still in favor of forcing annexation of # the island. He referred to other areas needing sewer that were already in the , City and paying taxes. He said he was reluctant to bypass existing taxpayers in favor of providing sewer to a newly annexed area. Mayor Nicoli concurred r } with Councilor Hunt. He noted that the property owners could "Bancroft" their' improvements once they were in the City. !z 4 The Council discussed the issue of cherry-stem annexation. Ray Valone,~ ~ Associate Planner, pointed out that though the Boundary Commission didn't ' ' -7 look favorably on cherry-stem annexations with the exception of those located QM -~1 K"7 within islands. Mayor Nicoli commented that the result of annexing Mrs. z g Tibbett's neighborhood would be to divide the island in half one half would have a lot of small properties (which the City should take in) and the other side ' s would consist of large, undeveloped parcels (which the City should leave out). Wft , if R, >r- Mr. Bob Bledsoe reviewed the results of a door-to-door survey he took several years ago on the residents' attitudes towards annexation: 20% were € r ` for annexation, 10% didn't care, 60% were mildly opposed and 10% were " vehemently opposed. He said that he did not think the attitudes had changed ' I j any and that the majority of residents were still opposed to annexation. Mrs. 4 r z y Tibbetts commented that that was before last winter and the undesirable t x=t r h E { sanitary sewer situation. ( t Mr. Hendryx presented the staff report, noting Mr. Valone's memo outlining the , h 3 history of recent efforts to annex the island. He noted that the 1994 resolution t 3 p`` ey r CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 9 f; E 7 e-P. A fi'- 2rY - - e "}e SS ~ 7 _7 -77 Y fS yt ~ ' L C: ~5 7 5 t f t` X - - - * - - r<~. J, i 3 _ ~ F v 3 J - J, v t' _ y 1 h S ^M PV s =-TM a , ~_-_~..»...~.-.~....~.a•~L .f Y z ,~jr7 r + s L r 4t,1- „N1- - _ - 5 - "'4 } -'-.1 If °`+q- -q - ...,_.,.....,..3......---..._ .e.-'m~~ \'k.+'av- - 4 - - 3ys?.- # v kit - - i _ i s - - \ y u , - e t1 T - 1 - { _ Yom` r passed by Council to force annexation for health issues was rescinded in 1995 i' E , " because of trends at the Boundary Commission regarding island annexations. ` ~ --:y-...,.,-° 'Y._..: He noted that a series of steps came into play if the county was asked to - t w evaluate a health hazard. i - 3, Mr. Valone reviewed the process for determining annexation based on health 1. ~ t` # } ' hazard. I-le noted that it had to be proved at the local level (Washington y County Board of Health) before it went to the State. Property owners could also initiate a health-hazard annexation. 6 ; r r` ~t K> r - 3 " I, 5- - P - - Mayor Nicoll encouraged the neighbors to annex into the City on their own k~ s rather than through the health-hazard process. He agreed that the process h s t j r would probably take a year, even if the residents began discussions with staff E y 1 5 > right now. Mr. Valone stated that he would discuss options with the residents. , ^ r Mr. Monahan asked if Council wanted to go in the direction of individual .,f[ ; Tp n t V* 3 . z rV annexations as opposed to annexing the entire island. Mayor Nicoll supported ~ - _ individual annexations of developed neighborhoods while leaving out the large = - - r undeveloped parcels to develop under the IGA with Washington County. (The ` " ,k, IGA included a pre-annexation agreement of automatically bringing the ,gym. properties in when they reached 80% buildout.) He commented that doing so ~ - 4 i was better for the City financially. f Y p~~ Sr 4 6 F L Lt , Mr. Monahan reviewed Council direction that staff was to bring back two" ~i scenarios, one describing the process that would occur if they split the island rx and one analyzing the complete picture. He commented that if they had two Sys ~ , ~ t = strategies laid out for Council, then staff had something solid to show citizens n n regarding annexations into the CitY - ; ' I ' 'mac - c§,,- Mayor Nicoli asked how close the staff was on finalizing the IGA with the County. Mc Hend x said that the were close to an agreement but that there , L ~ f were still some fundamental issues to be resolved. These issues included 1 y determining zoning and whose land use regulations would be in effect the t ' , ~q . ~ ' City's or the County's? He said that staff preferred that the County adopt then s , City regulations so that the people at the counter had only one ordinance to ~3 .'t ~.,?-t, - - administer. A ; ~ t , Councilor Scheckla asked Jim Coleman, Legal Counsel, if there were any i g3 .Vv.,.~ t tj a problems with dividing the island into smaller pieces. Mr. Coleman stated that i r , the creation of islands was more of a practical problem than a legal one; the } ` k question was how would the Boundary Commission view it. 3 {[t m h'? ~ k F _ Councilor Hunt asked that the alternatives include a "forced" annexation option for the entire island.<~ r S f t• 70--- j l CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 10 ° = wr $ y fir - t i _ -r f V - , - a _ t r - h <f ~_i ~P t s8 I - 3, ^P 3- r ` > nz > a ` . , Y t _ - s- ~L m. i . . - - : {v z a IiPI }if`rc`}. 5.4' Y iY r. - -2 t t v h } - - -t - F y _...-+.,.m s....rac.... - I :Yt t c - -fie t s Councilor Rohlf asked if the alternatives could include dollar figures. i:;,' j > Councilor Hunt expressed concern with receiving staff reports and memos at ` ; '1f x the meeting. Mr. Monahan agreed with this and said staff would try to avoid ` W j this in the future. K ,,2_ 7. UPDATE: INSURANCE "101" r - +•~o+ Ron Graybeal. JBL&K E. ~ 1 Loreen Mills, Administrative Analyst, ~r,ro.. Insurance, the agent of record for the City since 1991. She reviewed his s rM credentials in providing insurance and services to public entities. s# , f'" Mr. Graybeal presented slides (see handouts) to review JBL&K Insurance. 5 " - This included their internal structure and personnel, their service specialties, other clients the specific insurance coverage for the City (ProPerty/liability, ` - 4~ '1' Y> ~ worker's compensation, and employee benefits), recent accomplishments for t -tit ~ s~ k z the City and future plans. 5 i " A ~ -z I Mr. Graybeal noted that there was an opportunity to move toward self- + t insurance. Ms. Mills reviewed the criteria they used to evaluate insurance I RK, carriers, including coverage and service. Mr. Graybeal commented that with ` , u no US carrier offering coverage for inverse condemnation or eminent domain ` - ` ~ r. z proceedings, they were talking to Lloyds of London regarding that coverage. x F s ~r - Ms. Mills commented that their Workers' Compensation insurance has been s -mss=a r with Liberty Northwest since 1987 when they switched from SAIF to get better g a t~ 1 service. She said that they rebid the contracts every year but that this year ; (with Mr. Graybeal's help) they have negotiated a rate lock for - 3 u property/casualty. { - - u I I - I " -11 r Councilor Hunt asked how much work staff did to reduce the risk to employees ` - through developing better working conditions, citing PRIDE's conversion to y i € automatic garbage trucks that reduced the risk to their personnel and reduced x , , „ 11 their worker's compensation insurance premium. Ms. Mills reviewed the City's h y f~ efforts to address this issue through running loss control and safety focus w T programs, developing wellness programs, renegotiating work processes to ' ' E ' reduce repetitive injuries, and utilizing automated tools. She said that since 1 I k ' ` 1990 they have reduced their rating to below the average for local ~ governments and received a reduction in their premium as a result. r { ' ` r _ i In response to a question from Councilor Hunt, Mr. Graybeal said that the . - } ~ insurance covered Councilors individually in lawsuits on issues within their - F scope of duties. Mr. Coleman explained that the government was responsible Y: to defend or indemnify a Councilor named personally in a suit as long as he or { i she was acting within the scope of duties; the insurance coverage was ; ,ii ~..y 7 Y L {E 1 ~ 3 C . i~"- Y~ - ..5 } V ?MA _ ,g -r31 t F.- t C. - 1 i, -I d-' CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 11 pri' r ' t + s~ w s O f7 { $ h f - - }t I ~`f2'~, , I LI " . ~ . - , , ~ r " ' ~ : ' ~ E;i r aya S 3 _ S ,3~ k l' I %Z p Y h .i r Y 1 y: 4 r t - 12 11 ~ , - , J , , c s - - :w - i 57- Ap F~4 n..Y^ F 1 - NA ii~ 7 y -sef y ~ sy _ _ , f - y . 5 i 1 +.s J 3 J } designed to cover the costs of a judgment rendered against a Councilor acting 4 , ' within the scope of duties. Ya _ _ ' ~ In response to a question, Mr. Coleman said that in the case of a past elected official, a statutory responsibility still existed. Ms. Mills explained that their f ` - . - t coverage was written on an occurrence basis rather than a claims made basis. x „ vP a 5 Therefore a past Councilor was covered if named in a lawsuit for taking action r 1_ within the scope of duties at the time the insurance policy was in effect. She ` - " agreed that there were two tests: did the City have a duty to defend an official , ' 1 py and did the insurance cover it or not? ' t „ Mr. Graybeal commented that one of the things they could negotiate for the - City prior to a claim was a choice of legal defense as opposed to the insurance' } ' company simply appointing one (which they had the right to do after a claim f:; T Y was submitted). - , Ms. Mills cited an example of the City going to Lloyds of London to purchase ["i ; n- n z ; coverage for law enforcement operations in 1984 when they could not 3 k.; purchase it in the US. She said that it was not unusual to look at other options ay 2K' - tip xn , ' " w,~ ~ rF:r if the 'wf:s=s='" ~F~r ~ - - -j they couldn't find coverage in a tight market. u ~ Mr. Graybeal noted the improved earthquake coverage and decrease in flood I L ~ deductible in addition to negotiated rate guarantees to protect the City from market swings in the next years. He said that future plans included risk ~ ` I~ ` _ h i ' t rt . 11. 11 financing option analysis to look at self insurance versus traditional insurance, 11 - r W1`,` -'@" Z g, i x } € ' M and review of employee benefits. ` b In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Graybeal said that their 2 aF s W contract with the City was up every three years (current term expiring 1997). N-g A ( i a r, If 8. UPDATE: CITY COUNCIL GOALST_ ,It Mr. Monahan noted the update in the Council packet. He said that staff (.;;,y _ fart# y,- [ wanted to know if Council liked the format._ - ' 9. DISCUSSION: CHARTER AMENDMENTS 3 o ~ e r s o-t vas j Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder, presented the charter amendments. She k t, V m NE - ~ ' - # # noted possible language changes to Section 3 to update the wording. She K i pointed out the change in the filing requirement from candidates for office h _ M - 5 having to file for a particular Council position to those candidates receiving the K ikri - t most votes. For example, if two positions were available, the two candidates I tea + who received the most votes would be elected. Council discussion followed. ~ e - s _ r r^-sk -F r ~ t I~ - Q.'~ i ? a s i k T _ 1 ~,tt `S CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 12 4 I, 7 Y' 1. - - 4t ' J T , 11 . Y W 1 W t b 4 `l;~ - " " , . . A L ' - Y T 4 l k L V~"h SS - 5 t Y- U zs y - t S , 1 - y - r- Y ,w + t } 2 t' rtz , f \r ,9 s - r'- 1 -r--.--a~-~ arc - - - _F . - _ - , J« aL~ 'vS +w - - S C "YES-`''-- i _ F~ m x- _ - a i , 1 NA - . ~ , - - , - , -'11.11§', dA } y - t } d ~"--`-ci `re, - .=.n v.k w~.,,a..._... _ ~..._ti.....,.._„...,,..-'... has- t~'" " , Ms. Wheatley confirmed for Councilor Hunt that they needed to file the' > ~ measure by September 5 to get it on the November ballot. She recommended J a public hearing on August 13 to allow enough time to insure that the measure , _,,a, y.,,.. k~ , ' ~~'~-~'4 E_ r was written properly.,7, _ c':` Ms. Wheatley noted the proposed change in the Oath of Office language. The _ ~ E current Oath included a statement that the official has never been in an Z~~ t , ~ organization advocating the overthrow of the US government; the Oregon r.s^;:;~i'_ y. _ R. h-'T` r11F Wi--t- Constitution simply required an oath to support the state and federal a ` constitutions. I , R fi 'ter c , s Councilor Hunt suggested that Ms. Wheatley proceed with writing up the 2 suggested changes and bringing it back to Council for a vote on each section. p`` ss o-~ Councilor Rohlf asked about Section 45, Urban Renewal, in which it stated that t Y the City had to take the formation of an urban renewal district to the voters. ' *a ` t _ Mayor Nicoli noted that urban renewal districts were no longer permitted, and 3N $ ~ , . ~ - Y, 11 ` that they could take that provision out. Councilor Hunt expressed concern that = ? ' ` I such a change be explained carefully to the people. k ° y " ,T s S *rt5*a3~ a J Mr. Coleman recommended voting on each section individually to avoid f ; - M1 F ~ 4, ~ someone voting all of them down because of disagreement with one item. r , - M- -<'RAR~~ i v ~ F%; a3 x c Mr. Monahan raised the issue of proposing that a City Manager position be xs 3 placed in the Charter. Mr. Coleman noted that typically the position was r 4,` r } I -1 defined in detail in a separate section, though the Council could add it in %n 1k-~ I -1 Section 10 under Other Officer section if it so desired, and define the scope of3. s ~y' duties through an ordinance. , 1 e Mr. Coleman asked if the Council wanted to up date the language to make it ti ' t - - ri gender neutral, noting that they could do it as a general direction. The Council ~ ~ - concurred. '40- # 'a ! I - 4i zeta L ,4a Ms. Wheatley reviewed Council direction to bring back options on the four 'ea " { suggested changes. r~ z ~q 0 ~ r~~a-a h. 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS 4 + f : 1 Mr. Monahan asked that any Councilor interested in representing the City at ",^Ln} r ` 4 the June 26 groundbreaking for the new PERS headquarters on 68th & } n ' N'" ~ _ I I t ~ Parkway contact him. " F ` - , - r4 . J~ ~5M e..'`~ ty S N 5 y S 15 5 f R4 l z",a -.a t ° CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 18, 1996 - PAGE 13 - , _ 1'r fir- i ,r t sy1, :r .'s-"err„=T t a b,~ r a' t t c I z,f 11 , C ` - - r U . 1 , , - , ; - . i:: - ~ , - . , , , I 1 sW - - r°° _ _ r a0 r r i ~*Y 3 a fi St d ' =p , S pte t - 2 } X9,'4 P {Y - / - - ' t ~1 A 1 f Mal S_ - t S L . 4 , - _'_,,-1• _ i -0 - 7 c; n ' . , :c: max.. .:"sa• ,:r> : , n: zrv. y a. 1 . '+.'`''W'~ L ;ix, - •;ts; r,'"4 "'ka ^ ;1 ,x~%x:A• . . ra'•r ~yw. .J. 4"` ..5 :9! t"`'"<Nu ."h, w'>"°' sr "iS" -zFSY a `J'Fr r A ' f -m'" nr t s :k"Fs n'~, , )•Hr~ +T.' T±j"-i ;•-4! ' 9''• n fi Y 4 -'9~+`§ +a9"a"vt~n ,~t ,a d fc"-'` ;x^-x :ixy. ~s.m t `k,. :;r;~n, r4"i.`"tt w,d .tG' _w. •nt a. .r" xx~ ' S d'~`•`"PEE >rm "'~I.i '•"a:~+ 'i°„ .a, ."ei r" °«<_1++ -r,x.4 4eP: ~"dre' .:1 = ~'x . y ~'sks i , ,.a,,-i •r.:er. ,°•w•,„ . I„»,.. +s . I . 3, , ~ y~ rr~ , 2~„ . fie "y 3 ii, srl-• ;~,atr."= J, . f, , p `y'a • r rk" JM' > { 'a3aS •'"t S d ry. s ni'7:F•'• ;c$R+ K. r x•, tt' 3 µMfl,, .'a x,- r14' h, .r:--' '.bi .v?fin '4 • . . ° i , , ' ap'M : 3^A .,¢,..n 4ti .r7, „I, a'y1t, ATV _ J..,•3„ 1, n1. q ~n'~r s; }rr 'mss^' fir- ~_9•,,A .p r, r ~y, Irz.,. ♦ of ,ca k r r~: +rs5 g x,. gg T `E„°C, ,:t t 4 ! r- . P l1k F a y I d° fi ;;4 ~':w arty". ..~a...,vwc»d,._ , I ;'s'xAer-~+-.".'c....r. S`te ,.a• 'y,° .,r}., s-.a x >ki ,P „t;i,;c r•,t :,v;,i .r:i'„t's' $k . ,ruaS,4 ii!`"ir: -&K °cli~ I t a~ L r " xy3 b 3 i,rF i r ~ F~ ~ •~'uv,.~~t'~.ri z' w~,>k rrel~ ,~€t d'i m, r } ~ - i ry ~ „5 ki n sy t. V r+„4•~ iX r,~ h5 P _x . f a 7 a x 1 r 7 H N ~ k IP r fir, 1 r~t4 C vp d v' "3 K r lee 4r K o v n °o~'m y' r O a-~ ` t i y ° o m n ti r c = <°c c r ! ;a 90 N :3 rr y M z d° C f/1 F S, z j~ co a :9 Co =r z (D 0 fj- N y y y (D 1 _ ! ~ I \ _ CD i r (A O N Ol kf f CD oCL ka w i , 1 rn = ~o o~ `LM1 ro ' ° CD n~ ( t f CD r' ,P t r CD a a a,'" t k U) I r o 4 rr' i y Y C :t t J r 1 ~ _ a r S P s k _ ~ c" nb I 'sxL ~ ~ yr -,.Lh r '7 ~sP~4 ~r p.r4 j~ xr'i bra f r x c ~ a3 - ; r- fi iF4' fr ~^"!^•n'"•--~.'T^*~.,r•'^4°'r'"' M",,,e~""''; -~sr~r^.r^s:':'T,~!Y;<.+,5i x~<-.~ ,rr+"~.,s •~."8'"', r„sr„* ~A.r'l v ~ ».Yi,<, b 111 a? :ReN , 1,-'x.+,. ' L . L ~s hraj} '•xa: r~,'~r'~'"'St'• ?^?,~s" ,c'~"5 „5 rte.'. "'`Y . ecT'x~.. ,3 i _ t:r ~A'Y-~. 'J:` •C- A~,: FF1,M'. .:.A1"; fi: !t. ,"t' 4'•:',;, "^f, a, ,t. b ,'`"f!; S 5 " e , r.. .,r>,a t'' x .''Y'•.; sw 4 e'e.s r„r . !i.° ~,y +al .r f' .5: .rai° r S ,fie^•' c -i~~v t '~.:T"!U 'I'•b^. ~',~'1 5 L3 <fe.Y:T.. .9 i, f R~i = a•^ hi. 'v-+', "`Si' wi;G'- I'-^%"'F r% F._r,. r Sw: Y 's} F,r t~'=B e. '~°r d "<•l.~FTi z.'mY*.. :4~"...-,. . , _,x ` .r 'r:r•'1. ~r„ n: Fr. •9' ,a r„~Rf«.i i~, 9..s.v w , i. k.~~ 'v* r,*:s~21 •,ra`:."`" n'~d%~' '•r 't. < c~'' J v~N a i-';,r-' zri... r .a d, t~,,,. .•.,~n _rc , .,L d * f M' ''•'d+„'s}, •f dry., 4 ¢ a b~>K•" J' t:..:. w'~t , h' ' f'✓~<, :..a, " a',r-. ~n,:'.^4 .s? r , S,. r • s„, r v,r. ~ ~ : , rr-'~.:» : •s _ ; . , >r:,'=r~+:~, , ~r,.... ~ Y ~ y: ,.,",,r' ,..W ..x,. K •a ,Y, k +J zRf° ".'=,r, inp t'<„ ..r,. * -.r^^ sr~•3. 'a .,.cd rr %!k"•'r car . ,aC a,E"~Q 1i' !~'~si,,$,i:.a ~ s~ q } .,:t E'YS rX .z~v ,5, a#:.rq, •~p' r K :dyt... ,r` } : SalJ•-:} m},. ,v'/ "3 t W-ax 6 " ~rrs a ``E • -,.rt.. ..u(, . ,t ..ti1 ;`<.-fs ° •-a , 'S~ ;:;'r y,. '`F ' .,.na,~3,.,rs .,t," f x,.~--,Zr- r.~D , a:,r s ..i ' • ~ , _l,n 4"'G 4 i,. }aF t4.iA ~xV-, :5k": Ns'~,,: ,trM ~ Y,w'. .k .YZnY%' ~ tl~ :iL r`t. , ~ ,d - 1• . ~r 3 s ,N .fib "h ! ,W~ fs 4 F? i p '1 - 4'.i, 9 •'i,~'"F"' ek ,r~, t~" t+: "•T ~e`a•e"F. a"1 i•,',zs^< T, :3 ~..s'°.0.:V .h •9, ~ rl, $ s F+'."r 5 i. t .C Sir::-~. ?,•1~. y.x. .a:}_ ~gF•..y r,8°. J'r' ~r~' .1' x va'"-Mx"uS.;..,,, , pen=. ~ t-~. nt t +x:•. x .+1 :"*.'=C'" . ~ d 4:, d.,y y> - :k ~ x , ~ 4+ .y.° <,A ...w 7 't:~'^ ' "$r . fi X, i^, -`'rks' ,t4 'K!J'~t ,.,•z•'Y: `vw~•1- .`fi's' ~r .y A' A,7 .^'}H."e»-Yi'2 §.:4,~ ~ Y't''La 9~ H =i~`,a .,~v. .tr mst+, i , S'-:, ~€tk kxK': :A'wt",~.` ' aLr, . 3' rl. w .E*.`t ,c 's . I -'k.~ v~: rl, e .,f "fa•;~' :l„,.r~; <rN;`:r', 4 z r ,I'l Rr , Fr. v ar.. .r. .a ,•u 'h , x J ~•~<r~ >n>_ `~S ~Y ; „ a., ,,5~a r°l ar, -r ,--.r^*F'Sx'•54 s s :~.'t'°,., r ''y, Ma tit! +1-"A";~ 3 .c r,'~''°e;,a :.2t,: .,'a.r.k',. ,;A.,~~'"•;4 a^^ _`.r3ti :,r:. wx'-t .,r f ri ?.q,~3„~~''~„. ' x s, a r~ - ~ °i ^ ~ a . ,r.a„' . ~~J'. 7. ~ 1.^ ~ S".t ^ ,,p~i,_., ,t_ ~ .~K' -a "%°~€G-.. p',,~%t`'TF`"~.^~a.ew •y' 'a ~ ~,~t-. 1,'rr: ,«t;:~r''~ ,tva.- .x.?J-.,. ~a :~a~'.;'4. s,€+,. k ''~ff o,atS'., :.5:,: ,:.r~„",-rs ..r, n,. t, ,Y,•yh ~'s^,:Y 'fir ~n .ri,P,+~., r, yz _ e a { - d- "4 ~ ~ t v Fk f F, s-' ri t- Y •{4 ?1. f a -L' fia +*m, r-iaw,~. 1~ k" t'r'r `7 ~.-.•>r `r ,ry~r'+•Kr~'h - i-.--t°•'.-c.,.=•. r'o... r.,..,~ - ..ar.i- .,2... _ :e~' s: , ~i ' L:. t .?t~ _ rr ~.{i t Il•i;l , ~ ~ ~ ,.xrrwl t~' 7 r ~ r 'i; Y , ! , 'i , r t [''t vi ~iw ~ . 3,r P 4',.-r;is h r i B r~.e )`7 •F.F rr,',f - : [ ' .'t ! ff }a,L .v r;'-" ..sir--> ,t~:~' 1 ~ F. , : • 'S% ~1 I.;;:,r. i~': 5. :F_. 'J:' 1,u ki; i.=a;":' ::l:::'' It - .L r.: a S-°l.x,~i t - , ,1 1 y I v v ~ ! "fi~ 4 r ,1 t :i~"' . i1' +r !r5 t t ;.>i t r:, ~•d x 4a.:yP rr'. 'i1' i{:;1 t 1.,<'p ( '~}a2 yti I„~ {.~~it. _ , z:d:;ar. 4p 1y ! ' r a e° „ ^:41,. Lfi , 11+^J•i ye`I. ~~y F z r 777 - - ~~zk i its c'..ta` 3 1.1 e""-Yar . r x w)s 3 1S - a Y Y- k t a ^a~`~`r' ,~7' i di m - a E - - . 0. u ~yi 'soft h`- + ,r- I- ^+w+ _p 4n.l ?"4A.! .w.-.+~...a: e.... wku.d _-.+,e.+.-. 'd y1t- 'n i„M _ T P - i a € I.7. ~-aI , , { Lac . _ `v ,r _ g COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, , lkl, "`tize, , - '`'"4 P.O. BOX 370 Legal - . T, 'x - .}-i PHONE (503) 684-0360 1: <NoHCe TT 8535 ~ ,W 7 l- _ BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 M, - rtt - W ' r x+ Legal Notice AdV®rtisili rfns i f ~ x k -h` 9 1.y:1~ e a 't~ v n - _ + °City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice ' ''77' rtGAur, _ x~ E 813125 SW Hall Blvd, -l ' F ? e_c Tigard,Oregon 97223-8199 • 13 Duplicate Affidavit { -4~cr Kam, Y - w ,y f n i °Accounts Payable:Terry • ,,?4 a + x ; t- - -.x.` mss ` d ' r1 s s a ,x- :S~ r 4. Y y AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ' " ` " ' z -.t..;.1':., % : z .t ttls:l bw 'r € L° rr, STATE OF OREGON, ) Yi - ri ❑,r r y Y OF WASHINGTON, )as- pr tF. -'a x: a; r ' t r ~ - . COUNT - x:, 'his `r~ du r ' s` +s 11 1, I<athv Snvder t,i- t I being first du,y sworn, depose and sa tghatr1 am the Adve tisinTi Director, or his principal clerk, of theiad-Tualatin mes a tt ~ ^J a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS i93.010 q, 1 t a and 193.020; published at Tigard , 3 fir., =R42; _ of r s in the - - `.x~ - ~4,:-=- ; a eld ountY ari !e thgt the =F P . _ i _ _ - ' it ~'ounci o ,?.NN, 3 - ,,y!:. a F: T E p 2~k.A.P Meeting :.;--_r'~ `"~u' OM;; Yr i a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the N ix Y, i - i g}' _ IN .P r entire Issue of said newspaper for Ot1E successive and z ~ ~ ° k x ° consecutive in the following issues: ,1 tai Or i) F c+ -~d i x - June 12-199Fi +,.,.~```•';ca 5 t - t t , * P rx"a~ .7 '44e g 4 xr, F Subscribed and sworn to re me this? tth day of ' ]nne,19a16 r - h-'` l OFFICIAL SEAL I-V 1 - °,v ,ts--2 r %L s e»iz ROF''i A. ?tiPGESS ' F Notary lic for Oregon % N OIAh: { OREGON s a°~~ is ✓ My Commission Expires: A4,.tr cSIC: , ,.:iicS61AY76,?99_, r i~~a1, t' t AFFIDAVIT Tbefollowin% meeCm M- ] % highlights are published for your mformatioa gull " c e' agendas may be obtained from the City 'Recorder, 13125 S.W' -Hall. - ' . V ` , i < s Boulevard, Tigard. Oregon 97223, or by calling 639-4171 - ' a - Mt " ry e ` } CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEEMr ;w - f .~k R 11, - " i Tune 18.1996 6:30 PM. i~} ,f sw E ti E TIGARD CITY HALL-.TOWN HALL K, f t 13125 S.W. HALL BOULEVARD, T[GARD, OREGON p`j WarirshopMeeung'Tapics " r - ~f ` ~ 4 4 • Cituen IavolvementTeams (CIT) Communications & MecUna' r ( 1 nh r 'r I with - Crf Facilitators and Staff Resource Teams % , -Update: Metro 2040 mss. x,-tom,t t w • 51stus"ofCity ,COUncilG08I4 - • Discuss Potential Charter Revulons I } ) • Discuss Annexation Policy r. • dergrwmd Utilities ti „ x e , Ij ~ ' ~ : - • ` . T erring Insurance 101" w u sF 1 F - t r e , , , * Executive Session The Tigard City Council may go into Exeur ' t - a five Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e) r~ -41 x z (h) W discuss labor rcladons, real property transxuons, cwt ' 4 y -x - g- x , rt and pending liuganotl issues. * , + I t 1 s r a TrM- 5 , Pubhsh June 13 I996 - kw ¢ oi~„ i _i f i d'..-x=. xaaxr-0y,sc*aa;,. ----,~-,.+~,~«n ....,.,«,..ese, _ r , i `c,y Rte` '2~ a - { 1 -'-'3" -Y Ff tc"` t y ~.r A,j ?$r c-}~Y~F d ftd-l- ~f t s Ld s t" N/ - 7 - rte. 2 Y s _ r 'tta"~.r r - 4 i -,a - C v f a" z J; S i 'y - - L ,,.,',,,,,r, ',---,!~--"L,--`~ ~r . . - - - I ~~M~ I r - r ~ , 'r- , . b.-- a r--rte ~•"~T _ _~~a.~. ~.~.~r { _....f _-..z_~ :.v,.....- _ - r~.W . - I- -1 " - c~ 11 :d A ~ 4 - 51=0-, y. _ _ a v r` y ; Y L" i t - i - i,2 Y.^ s°' _ _ t - _ A t b~ an ~tal "rya. r r, `t r - -F - ; ti i x - ';r-~ 'k,} -,.x ,.r t x- n , a.5`*~.sC.`y r.~ c ) a r k z t- L N ,.5 ; fim* --t " ,g,~.a n s Qz 11 E ~ -ux„, ' 4q~.rv Memorandum - "-a,:;.,,.,4nar`^.'ia n~~= Agenda Item No. 3 4 V r-. ? r-; T0; City of Tigard ~;4 ~ ~x City Council Members Meeting of I ~_~rt (yam 4 Ya3sd mET -4 _ James Nicoli, Mayor F Q , Bill Monahan, City Administrator N ,N x ~ VZ,x 110 Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director . -t s ~t € X~ Ron Goodpaster, Police Chief r _ -q Washington County M~ ~x W - z' Roy Rogers, Board of Commissioners ~ - 3 Susan Wilson, Dept. of Housing Services Director E r _ Hank March, Office of Community Development Director g «ia~s } s State of Oregon > Vince Chiotti, Housing & Community Services Dept., CDC Rep. a' - I3 v f s„e { > & FrOm: Jeanette Sander, President A -jlY' 'Yfi gt i Y,~s Sam Oat hreath_ CPAH Development Con-_ 1t_-„t r, ,f ~ ~Z 1-1-1 Development ~ R - - Sheila Greenlaw-Fnk, CPAH Executive Director ' T j '`S v- r sexyS-°w ,T - - Re: Stakeholders Meeting " ` .n~-- I -9 O~~ s~ Tiffany Court and Villa La Paz Acquisition/Renovation Projects * rM _ , " Dt: June 10, 1996~~ ' 'ja~~ r t t f - ~ Y Community Partners for Affordable Housing, Inc. (CPAH) has been working for the past 6 ^ 9- r, -eft a months to identify and secure an option on its first housing project. CPAH's mission is to - promote a healthy community in the Tigard-Tualatin area through the development of affordable ~ r x 1 r housing, sustainable economic growth, and community-based partnerships. _L, } s4r L f i it We find ourselves in an unusual situation, with site control on two projects, rather than one. We ' x r originally sought control of Tiffany Court (96 units)--having identified it as the highest priority ~z sr xk~~ - renovation protect in the city of Tigard. After breakdowns in the negotiation process we *,O A i decided to move on, and negotiated a favorable offer on Villa La Paz (84 units). We are 4~ Wz~, rrrrrrrrrrrrrr m llr r committed to proceeding with the Villa la Paz project. F 4'~ - z - Subsequently, the owner of Tiffany reduced his asking price, and nego Tifftiatedany, even and are better now terms # a " _ that we had originally requested. We were able to obtain an o tion on t ,-I'll g4 ' exploring the feasibility of acquiring and renovating both projects on a parallel timeline: . , " . 1 4 acquisition in November-December 1996 with renovation beginning early in 1997. ry ° Completion of a combined project (Villa and Tiffany) would produce significant community ~ ~a~'~ benefits, but would also require broad-based support from the City, County and State. The ~ attached information sheet outlines what we believe to be the key community benefits, as well r ' 7 as the requirements for state and local support. 11 - 3 { j We'd like to schedule a meeting to solicit your thoughts on how we should proceed, and to ~ « { 4 ensure that we've identified the most critical issues. Unfortunately, our timeline for { ~ q s~ , ~ a decision-making is very short. If space is available at Tigard City Hall, we'd suggest that ; Y _ l dY,' . ~ g a ~ } ~ Location, sometime this week. Each of you will receive a call to discuss your interest and 4 e~ 1 ~ ~ t -n x availability. We look forward to meeting with you soon! }f 11, - ~ .f ommtanity 3 ~r~*~ ~ g- r,f: artners for -A I affordable l ~~t x , -zra - d _ ~~ti Housing, It1C. P.O. Box 23206 • Tigard, OR 97281-3206 • 503/968-CPAH (2724) ]29 a y f , ~ ~ a s_ 11 - ':~„p 'as t33y. -3 -,7 } -".".°"'y""'^x.nrorra" ?a.,^?"`"1`"-m"-,,041*".p:,wm;*'"'""'~ri..'~s "i, ~a ~rx 'e_,,,g.f I ..L f BRA h."^S2y'.,-.,,J~' -fP "f Y Y ' _ - iY.. a'-ieT -TeX$~t ,r 1,-, j. r} r s r r a t sg a y 'W x"E r, 1 L ,xm..-6~' p r q, a '•l i - ° y, " 'yyy ~ in ,~~,t, , ~ , - _ , ~ :1' ; - ~ L:'~~' , ~ _'t _ i q ~ x„. , #6 - P - -r - F hys` ~5 ~~'fr L. 1 `a' r m' e: e-~.43~- ,t ; r , rj-av % ~ d Yth ' tir,;r - a'- "r"- , j x - r . c I t "4" oE, r 53 1t'tr 'T f- 1 , x_ / , ---t l - _ r zt- r r ~ x r/ x r j(Z" S a n-r t° k?'- r Z - rT° i A _ m 4x t~'~~'"..,r~r rt zz,r - - - t } t 1-- r.>z - t vn ,'x°r.)S a 7 Tx -1 s W~'i, .t s, ' u t t, _ r _ z' w# ~x-~-3. •s y < f ~'"s f br }a e _ l_ - . 1 'E"Ealm. 1.""":-~~`,`!, rye S-r - r i% ~ - - ' My 4 ~.a,'a- . ~ ,tj 5 t, r"Y.t cr,.-.- - ..s,' ixy ~,d' +d "~.j gt. & - 9 s.w ` x"„~ 1r 0' q~ ? 7 - r S - g- lam'.,,,` _ - a_ & i N, s ,,t f t M Eug a ] __T R ~kl ~ ~k r 4a Community Partners for Affordable Housing, Inc. € ~ e 1 t Y Tiffany Court /Villa La Paz -Acquisition & Renovation Projects A~ a ' xL~<.'.des Yr'+a3' iy5`.'~i m lp~ , s Community Benefits A. , ~g - - Renovation would address critical life, health and safety issues at two aging apartment ~ "x ~ ~ , complexes, and remedy existing code violations; rents will even be reduced in some cases, a ~a w t ¢ ~ r, for much higher quality housing _ i zT tis' r t; 'rieP - " A 5 6~ Mls t " - s ~ri r s > ' • Quality of life would be enhanced not only for 180 families residing in complexes, but for r' . _i_ , 4 surrounding community zr , e~ ; ,I fig's ,,q , ? . < mss, z tx 'f4;';.} ~ F3': ' i.;1' • i.. 1.i"-,r"~_J, .yr .'..~-e?. Community-based ownership and management would guarantee timely and effective 1~. N' responses to issues arising within complexes and surrounding community r *t . i r ~ t '~fi be vided on-site and in the community, and resident councils ti "r z Supportive services would pro -11 formed to enhance self-sufficiency of residents ~i` A, , 1 s ~ - sn ~ a, ~ _ • Partnership with Tigard police would enhance community policing iniiiatives in iuese a ~ _ . neighborhoods, and reduce crime f I, , 3 `s .~~t,i7- _ r_ Partnerships with Portland General Electric, Community Action Organization, and the State's y It, : h Housing & Community Services Department would allow for significant weathetazation and s. . ~ F energy education =t li ` r t- l Community space would be enhanced at both sites, providing increased opportunities for $ M'yr a ;r" w- ; zq F safe and legal youth activities, and the possibility of cooperative day care F - 1~ r'z'v 4 f a 4 beg rf -;a S Preservation of 180 affordable housing units in Southeastern Washington County would be Q l guaranteed in decades to come, through CPAH's long term commitment to maintain r_ti . - I v ~ I affordable rents and well cared for structures and residents ; ti~ t x State & Local Resource Requirements t - r Washington County has already committed $39,591 to pre-development activities and u $270,659 to project development (through the HOME and CDBG Programs)' , the State of ` ~ { ~ . r Oregon has committed $100,000 (through the Trust Fund); however, these State and County * . s s ' funds were committed on the basis of CPAH renovating one project, and will need to be axa 3 { reviewed for the "joint" project scenario - # r v. ref ~sx, r g a r Affordable housing projects rarely "pencil out" without some level of local assistance related fi _~.r t a, w s to property taxes and fees; CPAH asks that the City and County support property tax % , . " abatement and a reduction in building permits and fees I - Me 1- aht k In taking on two projects, it is possible that CPAH will need to make additional requests for -Miy' ~ ' § Hk County, State or other development funds this fall; particularly if tax abatement is not , ,X rf t , r - z - secured sx s - ` -i Both Tiffany and Villa are currently "allowable non-conforming uses" under Tigard's € * try ~ 1~ planning criteria; CPAH asks that the City consider a proposal to amend the r r ` 3 ,f t _ ~ r - { Comprehensive Plan to bring them into full compliance , y e , ~ • In fielding applications with various financial entities, CPAH asks that the City and County ; % ~ r a provide political and/or financial support which will enhance our credit worthiness t y,js*' 1 F - t - PM ct 1 K111 3. Sx~° a " I ~,e arc -l ~ ,rx , rt~Y'rf, ' 11 7-^h 4 ; "`,+-'S'r t M - ,,,~y T h - ;v ,z- a 33„~~-'Fr" - - r wa °r y2 - 10 ~ 5 .x. f, t - 3 .+r x x- F 7 _ 'mot ~T.~, _ a -n ' - E{ N Y [ P ~O,A'., `~~Irl-_---,'~ ~ U - 2 ~ , _,~r, - 1, 1~~, 11~1~ , @ -?t , v,tp v 1 r > f ~a Rr - 5 s - 's w - y .F,., r , Y - 421h - ~.C } f - 3 3 t - {k vF'0i I - J [ " C•w"`"- .~r~.--~ -r'aa--~"•°.~'°7'- -,~`^-F~_-~z.~. meT^ -..'"rte mos.„- pt; 0, v x -a,s _ c - L r3 - r.y- n 1 ~y!"~gas @ 'J _ x - t 5, $ ~.u. 5 `''r 3 x~ + -v -,mss ~L p , 3 , st' ~ E? as M w a V, , k =h x au~ "gam", r ^~.5 Y's - n~ 4 Community Partners for Affordable Housing, Inc. - Oar w4 O A, , , PROJECT OVERVIEW d ~ t tfi y2 Y Q - k _-i t - EsM.-C 4 i, a.4o - , Villa La Paz/ Tiffany Court ~ ; ,it, , . Irr" w Acquitision'Renovation Projects ~ 'r; g "j ~ i a - - ar M -1 r X June 1996 I z i x N 15 3 Ake-;?;^~".i Fa~sz _ r , _ - h - ,y e. s~ fE 1;1 1,91R" - 11L,2_, 11 4 v x*-~_:.F t fig. I -1 f - s gam. 4'F - ' " ' ~,.'t_,,_ } a f i ri g ~ i 'i ft'Z A`r '-T A b~ t t 2 u _ fit` 3 1, -5 s Z A '1 s &3.-& rta S $ +~,~i tax i` .1 S~l f _ ' F EF ? , rite r, ' ^ ' Y _K r G aj ommunity P.MrS£-- ,~`~~1 , J, ~N_,~~ artners for , ~v - affordable kf~~fi { a r L__ & o u s i n g, inc. P.O. Box 23206 • Tigard, OR 97281-3206 • 503/968-CPAH (2724) ~ L- ^J'z- s rn il, i~""' i~;,,.,,p -4, M, F, T'r;^"-+ n Y Yf ~'?sww,%pv-.,- `a' ' ; r s .J'^ T - S+:Y b,',' -T.` za*~' r "a t° ..9 Y~ - z rt- a - - - 3 _ yU s a a- } s i - t -'S * r i a s xS ~ ~.~,'~j, M , - ~ ,,~~L, L, ~~,~~~~~~""~,--c"",~,~,~.--~.,-~~~~-,r"-r,.,r,-~* , , " , ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ r 4t- 35 t5 - --t ,s C ,ya 1~~'k w°8 3~-G d' _ - 1 T' s,*~,k`" * «,E - r _ 3 j s i p "sue ~ .I, _ I _L tt s~ r _ f s' s k r L U7 1 ~ ~ ~ : , - ~ , , ~ , r , - , ~J , , , -1 - ' -1 ~ IF a; a r r , k 'i , r-", ~ - ~ - 'L . PM , - , o , " , , , ~ , " - - , , 1 -~...~T..--_"_- a.~....-^^"~---~..~..-.....- ...r^, rte,° --c ,^v.~-'-r,..-t.er y_. t_ _ e1 L_ _4_ i -,.r. - _ ,ice - _ - - - _ - - - ,ci - xt' , v ` r {~jaekr`v. 1 KY - rr 7t•'_ ,-y ,-v _ , -14 _ -v_'aN~u.a..a,. .s..2Sa..Lu°..:.;.Ln....at-.MV`,.LL.631'{td.1..W3a':cgG - 9 N r ~ _ x - s y c 4g ,L y c - K ' LOAN/GRANIYTAX CREDIT PROGRAMS PROFORMAt rt a Data Summary f [t r Project Name: Villa La Paz and Tiffany Court _ a , 11 , -3 ~ t Galb . r Applicant: Community Partners for Affordable Housing Aprp~pIka n am Ga~tbreath Assoc Address: PO Box 23206 Address: 7720 SW Macadam fi20 s Tigard, Oregon 97218 Portland Oregon 97219' Contact Sheila Greenlaw-Fink Telephone: (503 244-3435 t Telephone: (503) 968 2724 Fax (503) 244-M6 Q $ _ c - ' Fax: 503 598-8923 -i i ~j ( ) W Applicant Tax ID 93-115555-9 r ;;k 'r :t_t- f Government -USltl/i.. v 7 3~`' I`" : T..r..^.::,°,S.^ A,oh-Apy auu,i Is ed _~J j k ' Nonproffit Organization - I~o♦ meless-Stielter t~ ~y _ ~ r -j, F t - For-Profit Entity - Transitional € 4'k - CHDO Elderly/Disabled (check one) ' a r z x - - - Apartments -1 IV a..1tt - Coneregate Care ~ V% _ p j - Assisted Living Facility ; E z 1 S' 1 g ' ' f x '5 ii! } -'X_ Option u g `~3 a _ ~,a {"i 7a r s - Other s 5 _ Plrolect TVOe , , -.,_,A-- - X-,, F _ New Construction - 7 r r X Acquisition -1968 Year Built E ~ '}r7 ~ ° x y `j Rehabilitation Year Built R 5_ y y .v P"3 b,6~ ` f 4 M ,ft A ~ ,I,, , I r 4LG"'4`ti Y ?rl- PCO CtV Location: 118'95 SW 91st Avenue, Tigard, OR 97218 7520 SW Bonita Rd., Tigard, OR 97223 ~ 4 I a s - x, x t. c~ J r ounty: Washington ~ i T 1 In ~Conlonal s t I rcate o units 8 At or below Median State Senate . - x a c _ , - At or below 80% of Median __-3-- State House { i , 4 1*s , At or below 60% of Median i ~ x s - At or below 54% of Median ]yllmr of ~ssisteay E No Income FHiOU - Total Units Trust Fund ~ LIHTC~ ~ ~ } - i ; 11 c,,- n 1 s Population: Working low-income families with children. F Target x a r „ Length of Commitment to Serve Tar~eLPopuliition: 40 (Years) + , ~ f 3„ The Undersigned, being duly o lication on behalf of the named Sponsor, _ € hereby represents and certifi ormation rovid this application, to the best of his/her r r _ 4 r { : 1 knowledge, is true, complete, and u vibes the pposed project. ,fit , i,, s - , Nam i f h i• K Signature Title Project Consultant_ ` i < 9~ _ Name (Please Print) am Galbreath M r > S ' a,.t2 f - 1 ,es s f t F, .k - - _.zKes .n.,, - -.s a r f Lw P, } G " tt~,-_,!, L2 ~ _,~_-,.~'11',_1?1`1 tl,',,~ , - , , ; L, , 1, t-"~,-~ , I " ~ ~ - - ; ~ ~ , "t - , , .f - - - l..' -t u9 U t -f~f,t f - f t 4 Ti. . y k: f➢ 'y r v - r z s 3 t , t U ry h - 3._°z - - 4 xf; - 7 _ - - 't_~S _ l. _ - t a. r - - r '&>~G iL . I a - 5 - 5 t4, ,04 E f i~ = 3x s y tam v rc k ,I si f~ STATE OF OREGON ~ , , I- ~ 3 ~A - _ LOAN/GRANT/TAX CREDIT PROGRAMS PROFORMA ~ _ 4- r Housing OceraUna Budget -INCOME ij - ~ s " Villa La Paz/Tiffany Court g 7 a , ` + IRS Set Aside: 20!50 or X 40160 (Select one) r zz W z a - w Project's Gross Square Footage: 180,700 sq. ft. - --,,r r ~ e 's YEARLY Residential Income: t'"~ ""P Medan Mnntni1 ~ r; ; K Income Rent Per 1st Full Project j.~~ , 'K-* it ' x Unit HOME N nits Per Unit Year Year 5 E ~ T 1 Bedroom 50% 12 X $390.00 X 12 = $ 56,160 $ 60,372.00 a` ri, - ~ ~ %1 ~ Ir - - y :t - 1 Bedroom 60% 12 X $474.00 X 12 = $ 68,256 $ 73,375.00 - k _ " z . = t M l~~ ~ 2 Bedroom 50% 12 X $ 448.00 X 12 = $ 64,512 $ 69,350.00 y~~ n 2 Bedroom 50% 30 X 5 486,00 X 12 = $ 174,960 € 188,082 00 - 2 Bedroom 60% 90 X $568.00 X12= $ 613,440 $ 659,448.00 , ~x t. r ~v 3 Bedroom 50% 12 X $539.00 X 12 = $ 77,616 $ 83,437.00 r v - - . _ 3 Bedroom 60% 12 X $654.00 X 12 = $ 94,176 $ 101,239.00 l ' -TOTALS 11,235.39 4-000 =Y~ t ° SUB ]§2 L_1.149-120 ~ 1A a t Service Revenue: 1- s,x; .y~"y 4 - { - Medicaid-Resident Services (Averaged) NA s,. ¢ - r.Y, ~~r wt Private-Resident Services (Averaged) NA c. ' ~r n v Other Services NA tr -,a4r I ' G~ ~ .x srk Other Revenue: I ~ _ Laundry $ 18,000 $ 19,350.00 i'rt rx y ~ . J Garage/Parking $ 11,400 E 12,255.00 z - Double Occupancy NA Deposits on Turnover $ 6,750 $ 7,256.00 a w y - T A j Other. Vending $ 1,800 $ 1,935.00 ' z ~I ¢ _ SUB-TOTAL OTHER REVENUE $ 37,950 $ 40.798.00 ~ ~ s et v- , x Effective Gross income: - s a w r $ 1,187,070 $ 1,278.099.00 t Less Vacancy Rate (5%) $ 59,354 $ 63,805.00 1 -11 (F T Net Effective Gross Income: ;_1.127,716 1,212,294.00 L , E c ' Note: Projects that provide care services need to delineate the service levels and anticipated revenue as well , r t as the bask rents on a separate page. , ' , * ` E r' s E t 1 ap ..a(/ k " y- , - YTS$R ->F-'S i J 'F+ 5 K? ! r J 1 f" y Sk s e - -Y F '4,' -L- ;'Sh ~i w5 ply. r r `2 L r ~ S £ ~ , is a3-f' za~ k ' J f pt 1- - - - . , t E - ¢ [ - - k ' "'q 3 r Fl 7 4 3 Yl- 3_ s k - r 9 { $ - M -p 4 .S r' _ - . - tg § Y t ~ at: t - f kn"ny PY K9'" - - - - m-t F h - }i 'S td - YF - - -d Cam; ~zi $ et - - -11 ~ x ._.._._..»w ,,.~,..~w. -..,~.t, .....a2,e..«_oa r.., -.~...W.,..is-. r.,,--, .i.%L,-s::s-tz.. x .,i-,a-».r........,..._._.. - 3 t -2 ' A~,~"-, y t x _ c,- c y _ 5i e z,-"°- -a#-,k, i. - - -,-a'te ` s F Y.-' Q 5 d STATE OF OREGON yg - ~ I j - , s Q LOAN/GRANTlfAX CREDIT PROGRAMS PROFORMA 3 - r _ ,i 3 - 3 y 51, c o _ a - Housina 0oeratino Buduet - EXPENSES r [ z - t: Project Name: Villa La Paz and Tiffany Court Annual lst full Project } - 11 ann=mr n~._!i Per Untt Year Year 5 4 T re r CD Insurance S 60.00 S 10,800.00 $ 12,420.00 r i UtilNes: (common areas) f t Gas/Oil $ 33.00 S 5,940.00 $ 6,831.00 ' i + $ ' z s - Electric $ 38.00 $ 6,840.00 $ 7,866.00 k' £S& _ k>~f , s'. Water & Sewer $ 384.00 $ 69,120.00 $ 79,488.00 ? -A 11 I 1~ Garbage Removal $ 156.00 $ 28,080.00 $ 32,292.00 E;` - I h ' ~ ` rz _ Omer ~4 c,-Q, 4 Repairs $ 325.00 S 58,500.00 $ 67,275.00 d General Maintenance $ 34.00 $ 6,120.00 $ 7,038.00 _ g'g~ Landscape Maintenance S 70.00 S 12,600.00 $ 14,490.00 -s ,~.r-', w y t Replacement Reserve $ 150.00 S 27,000.00 $ 31.050.00 i~_ £ } Property Management: * ' Q- A i On site $ 376.00 S 67,680.00 $ 77,832.001 ` 3 t Contracted (Off site) $ 339.00 S 61,020.00 S 70,173.00 i Professional Services: ~h . Resident Services $ 30.00 S 5,400.00 $ 6210.00 Z 3r~a 5 n ~r 1 ° r Case Management By Others By Others By others - 7 Legal $ 33.00 $ 5,940.00 $ 6,831.00 y , . 4 ` . V.3'; h Accounting $ 45.00 $ 8,100.00 $ 9,315.00 ~ ~ ~'i t Lti Omer x 3 ' , -Y J,-,I t W, P s ; z Office & Administration $ 80.00 $ 14,400.00 $ 16,560.00 ~ V u' Advertising/Marketing 6 Promotion $ 33.00 S 5,940.00 $ 6,831.00 r . r -rte Unit Turnover $ 156.00 $ 26,080.00 $ 32,292.00 3l - r, Taxes (non-real estate) Inc. Above Inc. Above Inc. Above , - . Real Estate Taxes NA NA NA ' - F Omer. Supplies $ 22.00 $ 3,960.00 $ 4,554.00 ° ° , ~ [ } 4-. t~ S.. may,.' { ~j'`N,4 5+ t' 3 Total Annual Operat)ng Expenses $ 2,361.00 $ 426,000.00 $ 488,760.00 -a r ` , Sr r Net Operating Income $702,716.00 $723,544.00 ~ ~ t ^ n ~ 1 t Less Debt Service: t i y,, 't. s 6.51 on $7,875,603. for 30 years S 597,350.00 $ 597,350.00 , fr ' _ 3% on $270,659. for 30 years $ 13,693.00 $ 13,693.00 U~ r s Total Debt Service $ 611,043.00 $ 611,043.00 s Cash Flow Per Year 4 91-673.00 $12.501.00 , i n J 4 S - f""" 1. 1 - - d Y I j 3 t< fr r a vy x.! _ - - - i y''- 1 4i r~ r Rt i• ° _ r 1} ~r i__ , § fl,i 4 - T - YI1- Y t h-u T~F~ - b` i pn" ~n - R { 11 - 1 _ "v I'Y _I ' k f - t r A 7 r~ : , ~ . : I I r , , r f'~:`,,', I- ~ I --~y - ~ f,1 _ .1 , , M, , , , L"~'-- £ - i 4 r/1r.-c~-.•-_ .r v { _:5s-+~h! .8 - "-_"-f 1 ~s ~~1- _ - -r c - 1 k > -.riff _ _ - € _ 7 I i i FGS tk s-S - 4 ; y _ . 3 p _ _ ! _ d f~z,~ ``s .1.1.1, - it~.' i'~' - -1- I - - 1 3 .f . j_ 11 w) F - y ,r kc fie . ~ - i STATE OF OREGON ~ { ~ t~ q ~i LOAN/GRANT/TAX CREDIT PROGRAMS PROFORMA c #Ir li 'tee w e a _ r r i r - Utility Allowance information ! - c , - Project Name: Villa La Paz and Tiffany Court E ` ~ ~-n 1-1 x~ ~ ° TYPE OF a Tom.-,~--.,,. T` rr .`r` f - UTILITY 3 s' k-s. t,£, "r. --`~bx i~Y v Heating Electric X $ NA $ Inc. $ Inc. $ Inc. $ Inc, r ~x e b 1 Lighting Electric _ X_ $ NA $ Inc. $ Inc. $ Inc. $ Inc. tqs - -z~ s"wi' Air Conditioning NA , 3 Cooking Electric X_ $ NA $ 26" $ 32. $ 39. $ NA s Hot Water Electric/Gas _X_ f _ g I L' #s "1~' ? x ; Water NA X_ ~...S .x+1 tzf,S e " , . - ' Sewer NA _X Trash Removal NA _X_ ~ ? s E i TOTAL UTILITY t t { ' v f - } ALLOWANCE $ NA $ 26, $ 32. $39. $ NA Y ~ "r , ' ^f r 1 If allowances are calculated by other methods, attach the appropriate schedule and include unit rents, number of J •-3*,-i~ 'Y4 { ;rzrk.. - _ v E.a bedrooms, and allowances. - ? 'f 6. ~ K z.E 101, i a, Source of Utility Allowance Calculation - 11 ~ aT '3 i - k} Name: 5 S J t„yVI`y1:'11 " 3' L ; X Local Housing Authority: Washington County Department of Housing Services K` 2 a.° Utility Company a r Other cr - t s . s s ~ " , .1 M k e`J 1 - wPt rv%yr 11 3 a~ _ ~ E a, s 's ` ~yw rx~, - ' ~Z4 _1 V, ftm i -.h C`: ice}" {i } fi %91 G L • 'l R £ ~ x-' k ~ F - 4 a"ti ~ M- 6 ~ 'A r~ ; ; i` 41.n i ~ ' M f s F4 k ~ ~ i s .a_ - r _ a: n 7.n :ate.. s § > - 3,a xt y ~"i ~ b3~ " '"1b cry - z 3 t- x c 1T"L''C~ s 4'F^ M '4 fry' E 5 S X y s.1L,- E ~ dj , ~ 12 _ ~ _ ~ ~ ' ~ r, , ~ " - r, - - - - _ " - _ , , ~ / x ✓ x fix _ 1 _ ,Fmss,. '`-i x a _rvtr V' I~ Y i. d,y s f - t -i' } a Z', '-;~k~'~%'~~ ` -rL"---, ' ' I , ~ 1, I ~ a , ~ " ~ , _x , . , r. .-.,4"-. ,i-" 51-F- J .r , 11 .1 y s r 3 S F - E % _ .J iggF l+. e- _ s. - - i- ~ f _ .g. 'eM` W 1 w t - _ jl c _ _ -s ks r' k - 1- 11 -,t. a`R:... mil- i sf z t j k - I .Z N T- t ~ 11. - LOAN/GRANT/TAX CREDIT PROGRAMS PROFORMA - .3 z~'a'- r rf #r _'k-'r°-' _ x,39 "4M,.~w5 ° - r_ x { h Uses of Financing 'a Project Name: Vila La Paz/Tdfany Court tm-.>' ng % - p I COST SUBTOTAL SOURCE t - ,a gs "%s. - - Aegulsltlon COSts ~k ,f 3 Mf r ` 7 , Purchase Price: c- _ w s Land $ 870.000.00 4 - u- £ _ Im{xwements 54,784,400.00 Taxes NA .,£'-.;•~g>'h ";;~,'-,t _ PS s s 5- a Liens and Other !s~ F;e Closirg/Recordiin9Costs $ 2,400.00 ~Vj _ OH-sPoa CosisllmP is NA - sr,. f j s P r Other NA # j Tx ri - -i - - - Subtotal S 5,596,600.00 WCDHSr73orW/EgtAy - k L r. z ~ . `t)" s - vet' x F Deveboment Costs t' - ~ _ - 3 Building Parmts/fees $ 00 ~ ~e ' ~ System Devdoprnerrt Charges S 3,600.00 . ,I' F I 'F ` t Y s ? - i Market SEnvirwvne ta1 Report (h'P~Y a Level 1) $ 3,600.00 - ...s~_ 4-1 4 ` - 7 _ _ Sails Report (Geotedurieal) $ 4.400.00 ~4~ . -1 iF " } ' Survey $ 4,800.00 _-3--' f._' " r 7 ArddtectrnUErgineering Fees $ 84.000.00 - x Legal/Accounting Fees f 45,000.00 ,45 ` Cost Certification Fee $ 4,800.00 j t - _ Appraisals $ 8.600.00 3'~ -c- my,.' . ht Lender Inspections $ 2.400.00 - r . i.' _ { - lender Tide Inwranee S 3,600.00 a ' s - - "A~ ~e~ 5 ,-9 z t rrrrr e Construction Loan Fee Inc. in Penn. ¢ _ :,t !2 s "S n .rte ,-1g ,i;1 _ `T, °i Y z Pemwnent Loan Fee $ 157,512.00 ' : - - _ Constnrction Period Interest/Taxes In Operating _ ` , " _ t 2. _ Construction Period Insurance In Operatug f ° a. p„ rf 3; r Tax Credit Fees S 1$000.00 - y, ry ,,r, r" j, s x Bridge Loan Interest $ (59.609.00) - 5 , R - - Ckxcing Fees $ 3,600.00 _ ~ ; - i t!x f f - Marketing $ 2.400.00 M i- - ~;1, , , Lease Up/Operating Reserves f 518,030.00 ~ -~r c*~ Dsvebper Fes $ 520,000.00" e r 4 Consultant Fes Inc. Above -r rt y t_i %t Dsvebpn7ent Contingency f 24,000.00 r `v ` :">'p,.. x, { Tenant Relocation f 24,145.00 1-11.111.1- i l t - . Other: Letter of Credit $ 118,134.00 _ z 7 ~ p i - r r i Contingency Reserve $ 238.268.00 i i a r~ - r Replacement Reserve $ 13,500.00 p t'' r -.a } x z- - Subtotal 'f 1,761,483.00 Bond/Trust FundWCCDBG r t~,t - t - t Construction Costs a , " ~ , r r's" s F a _ On-sits Work f 270.000-00 - °t"r'`^ Y T'-~,1~ ; : i t~ - 91 I 'i ' t ; Hazardous Materials Abatemarrt Inc. Above s m' ,s, < 1 - Q'~ a Residential Building Construction $1.807,859.00 - P'T try I—)a, - I - a Common Use Facilities Inc. Above - b-F'>- t, ~ . t , -4x ;1 t Laundry Facilities Inc. Above >F' ` k ' "„f.=-M~ ' 'I y, t dy a' .a a a.` Storage/Ganges Inc. Above f .'rr' ;:j " ~a `c - h Landscaping f 58,000.00 rtri , y~f,,. r . .4 1 P a° k Contractor Overhead/Profd S 144,618.00 c. P - Construction Contingency $ 104.023.00 i P/ „ I , - fi r OtMr': Bond S 37.177.00 _ -'~4'r ,-g- Sr- a Subtotal f 2,354,217.00 Equity/Bond 'r-A .sEL$ia 1 zxtE`t „f " TOTAL PROJECT COST j 9.724138.00 i - -sr i w £ r z jk j ~ --mss Ixl tN. - ?-'-c- -.,-..,....grew mYn3__ ;n ,a ;n-;.a srJ`,. ' .m.. iw s=z.r.^artm,~.,..-.r.-a<.. , `a tit ~sA'^il„ - ~t -r'as- fi 'T '",.r,, -uY.~, zY ar - : :as`ir'"`',.~,~T:_~ ~Xi t r -}-y j ~ k'4 f S- - - -1 F i7y{ i i i' r e- Lr raj x i'#-,ter - t _ } - j s ..y^.x+rf~L 'f,.,~jl "-4" - {tt.... r . 2j - ' ~ rr r F r k 1 o xr - .r xis H -~#a" { _ - - { _ e`-';~ ~It er r ~ £ : r.3 s.f ib -7.E- t - - 1~ ' - -7 { N-4r-`~te, k a - c yy~ p yN~> r t e ''t'v' a ¢x r r x _ z -A.b t 3 r k z' x i +y`/ ,-w-~~ t ya..i~t. Gam-.- L 6 rat-...~' ^t i^.,^ - - N. _.y.4 ~...__._1 _`.t_«.._s_.._:._1~___.. .1- ~..~ra _.n_ _--s-..... _-~.,.__Yi ,<f~Y F - I - t 11 s 1r 1~'~,"'~-5' , - L-""-.~"'~ ~'j~~' , " ~ - , - - ~~7~ , 4'! I ---~Ij_ _~-'_~~t iM _N~~ U';7Z'91__1 l~-:,~'~'-,'~b'-'~-L-,~-.,',-'~-"' - - ~ ,I- ,1- _`7 _ - J. - dre, zirc}=. . - - Prs _ mot- s- - T "!i$ g* awn 11~1.11,_';_- ~ _iJ'', I 1- - - > 4 1i,,' v tj _ ~;~a - _ I r " yr z LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM ~ s 5~ `M 4- ~ x VILLA LA PAZ/ TIFFANY COURT " k Sources of Funding Statement` t Source Committed Conditional Tentative _ _z i ' ° HCSPrograms: P s ~ Trust Fund $100,000 ~ i s wY i 7 Risk Share $7,875,603 _ s"; i I" iT'"'S 3 C ".n~A arH i . Grants /Non•HCS:~ ~ w WashCo. CDBG $ 24,981 ~ f -T fi t-,,K '.'0M ~r r a ~4, t Loans/Non-HCS: ~ , #W' t a4 i£-r d xr ~ xf aI . ~c;z; , 9 WashCo. DHS $270,659 'Z U , r ; WashCo. DHS $14,610 ~kk?. << s k Applicant Contributions 9 ~ i a Equity $1,452,995 Subtotals: $410,150 $9,328,598 t i -Lr € .rh"z - , ~ - TOTAL FUND SOURCES: $9.724.238 S ~ ~ ~ k E3 ` - - ~Y; - i p §i 1 g a ' E ' y. f r Z ~4 m, r _ L , N d l E~u~ ~ X _ r 1 k'.;L1 3 't e YN $ c _ ~"I1_ ? p } Cdr IC y F _'gP${ 44. d° a y~s I _i rc 4 S _ Ya'- x t y^ >sty-x-~ -.3&T i 6_ `fir x,s ✓ 2 i 5a "ra >f'~S < .l.~k - I 7 aw , c+s - ssk~ ~9.f - S o{'a-5 ~~~zf~ aA 5g3 _ z - ~ _ - r - ^ - „ - ice` „",.,s'" ' a y 0 r~~ ~ - f yF dY' 4 r rs r, r £ z k r - r r " _ ri.ss"- "vim y - L , - ` - ` '-jr ..r i - , . , W F kc/ - tr ty'* - t- d2, 4-, z'ataFx; b1. £.u~-.~-fY'+ trd zc x.~Y r _ 3i t ..,r 3,~v` ?*T' A k P'yy3 r -r-r a -5 4 2 ,ter _ .l - a r,~, _ K..P'L _„S, k 'fi't'-{ i 4 I - i -t' -t3 4 "'a F~ r,{l Yy_ «z`~ `yx ' %E. ".iceia 0 i. c' ~+~m'~`~ T>'~.~i ---~`1 s u r _ . , 1 " - ~ - - , _ ~ -~L!";7'1';- _P""11*1351d , ~ ~M E? ~ - ~ ~ __'~L~,'~'~"' . " - 'X~ , ~ I -L 3 -11 t _ W 2 - - - 2t ~1111 H 4 a - .....w... ....,..«».v.,.+sw3..._:.,.-.a,......n ....•.,.,.__-.,.-..«..._•..w..+.xxrwsx..umn:S.Sa~~v.ww......a.~.«. x.....~_.~.Y.. S i, r~ - r f STATE OF OREGON as _ LVAIV/lltAN'1'fl'AX CREDIT PROGRAMS PROFORMA F..-- Estimated Project Schedule Project Name: Villa La Paz and Tiffany Court 4 3 c 3 - mµw -i 4 't ESTIMATED DATE REMARKS ACTIVITY (month/ ear k 7 _ SITE' tion/Contract 3/96 OBTAINED t c S s Site Acquisition 121% 10 YR OWNERSHIP Zonin A royal 4/% LETTER ATTACHED ' f A Site Analysis 6/96 LEVEL I - - , 4 Building Permits & Fees 7/% RT & ASSOCIATES . { c ~l fi a s l Off-Site improvements NA NONE REQUIRED FINANCING .t Construction Loan' ry r a"z 17 7 s 43 - yak.W' s # Prosal 6/% KEY BANK y iii, Ni ' Finn commitment 8/96 Permanent Loan: rk ' 4 11V t Proposa OHCSD RISK SHARE t + 4.7, l t Firm Commitment 8/96 OR WASH. CO. DHS SYNDICATION AGRE bWM* 11/96 r t`~ f egg CONSTRUCTION BEGINS 12/% 12 UNITS/PHASE r4 s CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 10/97 9 FHASES/30 DAY EACH j ` S PLACED-IN-SERVICE°O NA CURRENTLY OCCUPIED LEASE UP 11/97 FINAL 12 UNITS ° as 3s? 5 { *For LIHTC Projects a } x f "Certification of Occupancy s sr t + ` I' a s }Y l _ - r 44 t - { 1,~ i 4• - F I I 4 T s a a s r ~ ~ f ~ r t ry , d 7 1 - - d P r -Ii- 7 P 1 1 } t"~ k - - - - Pill IWO 'i r7~.fr~az ~AXS.s f I aa~ _ # Pik^,_ s;"•+ ~.,`"','.3 _'`F':s ..,c. *~-x e:~.~,.. iit,' T 3'er - `'s'^,' rcFQ U,i..,, `':n'.'._~:~.~;yjr• TM~;, f STATE OF OREGON t~ 1 4 LOAN/GRANT/TAX CREDIT PROGRAMS PROFORMA Villa La Paz and Tiffany Court s } r Project Description $ , Total Building Area 180,700 square feet gross t ti #t - Fs 5 z ? Site Area 6.46 acres 01 Zoning R 2 Form or Site Control Purchase Agreement , 4 r SITE INFORMATION } t sw+ x s a F ' Is the project site currently under applicant's control? Yes t ~ g ~ ~ ' h 5 If yes, control is in the form of. Purchase Agreement Expiration date of contract or option: 12/46 Exact size of site: 3.01 acres: Villa La Paz, 3.45: Tiffany Court, 6.46 acres total t ,t^ r is site properly zones for the development? Yes - R-2k r 20. Are all utilities presently available to the site? Yes s kx rs 4 r Is any building in the development with 4 or fewer units occupied or to be occupied by: The owner? No. A person f r4 x?~~ related to the owner? No. ' WELDING INFORMATION Y f Project Floor Area F f k x F;-mT~4 j laL]fdGlifi~ FT. x UNIT NUMBRR OF AVG. c t TYPE UNITS SQ FT. SUBTOTAL ax x y : h Studio NA NA NA NA -3 ROM, ]-Bedroom 24 564 13,536 13,536s 2-Bedroom 132 839 113,265 130,265 I 3-Bedroom 24 1,007 24,168 24,168 § 5 ' All Other NA NA NA NA g x J"I r y Sub~tal 150,696 { a 7 a i Common Anal 2,020 Office/ * t Maintenance Commercial None NA NA NA NA k Y f r v k Areas w Other None NA NA NA NA a F $ ~c a TOTAL FLOOR 152,989• E ^ AREA 1, d l d ~ p f Y }i- F Fr v; • Net Rentable Area 39, ~ t, F - fry - _ 1 F 1 C}. „t }y s''+,~ t n 63 i d LIT a > i-w F -.9, f - Y k ➢ 1 W ..:,I~),ll R1, , - kLV 0 "i 'I i~~-~,~'_~;-_,.,.,~~','-~-~ ~l-,"-,-, ~ ~Z,,,'!`_~, - I - - ~ . , , .1 1. , , ,'~l , , - ~ , , , -1; I - - ` I'll - ~ , ~~,4t,." ~ ,',~;r ',Z`W,;Z~A~_~,,- Y~y .'y+~F"3., , % a i r t h s t z t t Z f i 1 e # z t fit . - '27'"` '.`'cy. ~t € 7"*,' - r - 2- t' seta L ~y ~AW~~ Vx.F skv it y ti a 1, .:l C ,fin 10 'WE& N,~ g b' a Number of Buildings: Total Number of Parking Spaces Required*: _262 ea fp; ~ ~ *4 2 , ~ i Total Number of Units: 180 Percent of Floor Area Low-Income: _IQQ% F , r' (n Number of Low-Income Units: 180 Percent of Units Low-Income: 1009¢ r Y is -r - t K. f~ ~ - Numbee of rwide^tlat doors: 3 * Spaces Available on Site to i i ~ x Does this project consist of transient housing. _ yes X no - F em . k t ~ i' 7 3 ; Preliminary Architect Documents Please provide the followin¢: n x. ~ ,_.,i -,T a" ' 4 t Site Plan Photos attached r~ < Floor Plan (1'=40' min, scale) Attached s w Typical Unit Design Attached - s,r' - xy ` 4 a ~ + ` a DEVELOPMENT TEAM INFORMATION F ~ y Contractor: RT & Associates, Inc. Phone: 777-8096 - ` is f - 11 Z 1z Consultant: Sam Galbreath Associates Phone: 2443435 $W 11 Architect: Aaron Faegm & Associates Phone: 222-2546 = { c Tax Attorney: Michael Chellis, Preston Gates & Ellis Phone: 228-3200 .111 - _ " € ~ Tax Accountant: Deloitte& Touche: Mike Silver Phone: 222-1341 - ' = Syndicator. Sam Galbreath Associates Phone: 244-3435 a z. c ,111Z.-U, s Manager. Guardian Management Corp. Phone: 242-2350 4P - ~ , . Other. Lavielle Geotechnicat Phone: 287-0511 z ~ , n - - _4 :.,do- } -r "C -fps T t - What, if any, are the direct or indirect, financial or other interests members of the development team may have with other members »r _ of the development team? "z - I e ° ' " All development team members are Independent Contractors working for the project sponsor. ~ % , 1 - F 1- , 11W! R } Thera are no director indirect, finaacial or other interests existing between team members. # # } k i" i In what other projects, if any, has the developer(s) or general partner(s) received an allocation of low-income housing tax credits and r in what other projects, if any, has the developer(s) or general partner(s) sold a project which received an allocation of low-income l ~ M housing tax credits? None a ~-j } - t - '"4ta"a. 3 a Notification of Local Official ~ x I „ ~ ~M I 1-11-1 Provide the name of the local politico! jurisdiction in which the project shall be located, and include the name and address of the chief 4R'r~r F y r executive officer (e.g., the mayor, city manager, etc.) of the political jurisdiction. The Applicant must notify the local official in " writing of intended project development and attach copy of letter sent with response you received, if any. The Department will also I p ' j 5 make contact with the CEO prior to reservation of tax credit. :~fL, w ~ j - , F _ CEO Information a ~ ` ~ a j ° r Name: Bill Monahan r h R i sg Political Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Administrator k ~ , ' :1 $4 n { Address: 13125 SW Halt Blvd. r e{ ~ { x t City: Tigard State: OR Zip Code: 97223" - r n u-' Telephone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 - a I z ~ y a I 1-1 _ ` 1. a fs b~ g, r i d{ .d.« # 5` , - Y ; F EAR s _ a r r ''~'-v'.x-;r s,.~ 5c: -.:-.3 ,,.~.7iw..i'. ~'x ~~"i,'t "l "'7 -S r' h _ j d is A A,< i . ti G ' mss., E-1 r s _ - Fg Gel z_., s 4'~ - - t - - - s - +,nt fi G 1 z`"`-{f t ; --.sb 3s. - Y A L `t 'r177 ak--t d d s,j 4 x. EE LLLLLLLLL - - - - - - - -_afi - -,5- - r I - I" " ~ I . I I - " ; ~ - - ~ - - k , ,~z -~-5~~, , , ~ _ - , ~ . - - r- a> 5 c ss.z - fin, fJ " S - - - - - - - - 'z. R X 1 fx - 'k . t { - 1` ! L - a ,a G S - _ T - rI _ ' ` PROJECT NARRATIVE - s i r NEED AND MARKET ANALYSIS e _ ti s. s ' I. Market Area x' 'Ift r s a t* Community Partners for Affordable Housing serves the Tigard-Tualatin area (including King - s• g 1 ; City, Durham and other contiguous incorporated and unincorporated communities). The I market area for the proposed projects is the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon t 4 E. , P , ~ p ` z - r,t -t. a ~tl Housing Needs G r , a`"l r it The need for affordable multifamily rental housing in Washington County in general, and Tigard i f specifically, is well documented. While nearly one half (41 of the multifamily rental units to R I ~ 11 111.111,11 the Portland metro area are priced under $500 monthly (therefore affordable to households at i - , 50% of median or less), only one-quarter (26%) of those in Tigard fall within this range- This " ~=3~ ` s M`a - housing unit supply information is displayed in the table below, "1995 Multifamily Rental Units." : - - tl ' Based on 1990 Census data, about one-third of Tigard's households (3,588) had incomes at or below 50% of the PMSA median. An admittedly rough estimate of need can be calculated by nngg ~k r o tali the number of households at or below 50% (3,588) and deducting the number of units a r2 affordable t0 these households (1,370), resulting in a shortfall of 2,218 units. Applying the ~x A 1. r { same calculation to Washington County as a whole indicates a shortfall of 26,979 units. This t xs information is displayed in the next table, "1990 Households by Income Level."ri ` ; ul-1 , _ - 1995 MULTIFAMILY RENTAL UNITS Y % _ ~ t4lonthlyRerrt Tigard. Wash. Co i Units s Units 9 (PMSA), t ' { Less Than $200 61 812 ra r $200299 150 1,353 5.029 z x ,ogg., . p I [ , - ~ 7,738 4 , W111, $4005499 5514 14.563 x,; 46,439 & Subtotal: s Units 1,370 (26%) 10,328 (24%) 73,769 (41%) ( Y , I-E 1 Affordable to If -holds h t at 50%o/Median p -1 I a $500-$599 954 11.059 , " a $600 $749 828 7,551 28;0 5 _ f 5 $750-$999 1,106 8,751 27,226 y $1.000orMore 1,072 5,442 13,187 ' Total 5,331 43,131 181.063 r s 1 Q~ a- 11 10- F` r x z - ` r , r. 2`~ ice, x. - Y r _j, x { - p sj< ,r t s { Y 5 fh s t _ _ - - - - ,n '1- R - - - - y,- `7 d 5 C _ I " L ~'R` ~ ` ' ~ - - I I - ~ I - I ' ' r ~ , ~ _ _ , - , ~ , + [ J_ 12 - , , L~, ; , , , I ~ . 11 V . ~ r, ~ , ~ ~ ~ r ; : ~ ~ ~ I r , , ~ ~ I . ~ , ~ I I I I ~ I , ~ ~ , ~ , . , - - , r t r as - r4 s>~ s.°h 3 h F - _ - 4 y a`NY. - J Y - 4.-. - - - 3r a Fliga a - - - - ..._._..,.•,...,....,.,E:~.,scr ,.aea _ Y - , 7 - T~, 1 d a b ..S E i , - il.. Y ttt.~ _ Y 'k , e'". , wry } _ " _ y ~ { - h 1990 0 HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME LEVEL k°' ,z j s - ~ti Income Level Census Tract 0309 Tigard Washington County e - r Less Than $5.000 36 252 3224 : 3 $5.(X)0 9.999 166 646 6.525 ( - } P s _ 755 7,803 M 3 $10,000.14,999 169 t r M y S15,000 24,999 390 1.935 19.755 _,J I I r Subtotal cnreaGi 3588(30%) 37,307(31%) C : 1990 Families 7"s , b t at50%ofMedian r or Below _ x i% £ - M 21,170 $25,000-534,999 421 2,344 a~ $35.000.549,999 291 2597 25.268 t s $50,000 or More 194 3.555 35.413 r , y Total iHouseholds 1,666 12,084 119,158 ? , g - h j ~ z Notes: In 1990, 50% of median income figures for Tigard and Washington County were roughly the same rr , , } ($17,800). The closest Income range category is that capped at $24,999. Note that TgaN's 9opulatbn has r` a~ ^^re ~d by 5,350 since 1990, an estimated 2,326 households. This should more than compensate for the fad & £ ` - that the high end of the selectd income range was greater than 50% of median income. :k , 1:_, z « Z Note that the Census Tract where Villa La Paz is situated (CT 9309) has a far greaterconcentration of low-income t , , - , families than Tigard or Washington County as a whale. Source for Multifamily Rental t1nIL5 is Metro; Income is r E . 1990 Census. € a r ' f , a € ~ - .rte u , The Department of Housing Services' unified waiting list includes over 2,000 families, almost 80% , 't of whom earn at or below 30% of area median income. Most applicants for housing assistance E " wait from two to four years before being housed. As of 1990, less than 5% of all rental units in f ` r Washington County were affordable to the more than 5,000 renter households earning less than ! rr r 0Y It -A - 30% of median income. The 1990 Census found 8,977 low-income and 13,593 moderate-Irtoome F , households living in unaffordable housing in Washington County. ~ - X ;n,,~ , ~ , - 1-; 3. A Target Population € r Population Type: Families who live and/or work in Tigard; particularly those at _ a 60% of median or less. ~ ` r i Size of Population: More than 3,588 households in Tigard y ~z k ` More than 37,307 households in Washington County y r A 4 ^Y ,"Rx`' , i 5 r i Income Level: 1000/6 of units will be affordable to those at 60% of median. , ' - Y j ) ,g x Age: The project will not be targeted by age. t 1A r h2 P tf, i9 tv,. - Other Characteristics: The project will draw upon community and site based supportive services which encourage self-sufficiency. I 4 f ~ 3 } j 7t 11 F ` - ° _ i f~ y ? Z, r ' i FF1 _ ~d J _ ~ ~ >E F A ! - `t - - - - k 1 f, 1 i -t, _ - - _ - _ Y v _ J ,Ir " - - ~ ~ , , - i ~ ~ . I ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ - ~ ~ - 23 4 , _ , _P~~Z' , , ! - , j-' - r ,fi Yl {f - z, i - k- x a s- 5. - s 1~ a r 1 y v , f + i L , , , , , ~ _ L r,; ~ ~ , . . - - ~ , ~ , - ~ ~ , , ~ -'r, , ! ! ~ ~ , , - I : ~ . ~ - - 43 z r iw - S=,.i i - _ tf f+' ~F~p - -S S - ~ _ - t ' ' f ys }TZ to I _ - Rxis... ~a. -,t - _ - 3 4 _ ; ,31 ~V -~,tk',~ mss" •4 4 s ` R"' '-v~'r .«,~-,..s.l~ 7. .4..>a.s.A». .s,.e....a,~S.:.r,...a. ,.a.~~... :s":.:.~.,aa.. ~.:......._...~..._.~.~<.-W.-.. _ __0 g 9 ~c, 11 I 1. . y -s iXrN t, 1 - ~,fir.'-- - L - ;Z 4- Rai - C' u ;°T t44 7 ry e -nth ` a" _ _ I a; = 3. B. Loco! Housing Gap a 11 p Number of households in need: 3,588 ` 4 t , Number of units available that are affordable to the population: 1,370 { Number of units deficit: 2,218 ~ .1 4 ` f - { ' _ - Notes: Information referenced in two prior tables. x ' t `a.: s 'x Ott a _ Y - ~ 4. - i' - RENT BURDEN: GROSS RENTS AS A °k OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME PAID , „ Census Tract M309 Tigard , ~i~.q-":i7~-~i:"~1,1~?~m--~~"-."..'~-1.11I , I[- I IL . - $10,000 annual income: `na a r r paying less than 20°/. 6 6 w- Paying 2024% 0 13 x; s , paying 3034% 8 8 "F:__-_~ paying 35%orMore 129 660-E $10,001 $x,000 annual income: , ~4 y , ~ V t 4 paying less than 20°k 0 0 . paying 2024% 28 128 paying 25-29% 35 172` `f - j Paying 30-34% 56 262 ~F` x _ , p i paying 35% or More 108 511 6" - , ' , , F — - i Total Paying 35% or More to Rent 237(64%) 1,231(45%) ~ , ~ , s 3. C. Housing, Jobs, Population Trends ' a~ - j ba~~ The City of Tigard (incorporated in 1961) is an affluent suburb 15 minutes south of Portland. - 11 While Washington County is the fastest growing county in the state, the cities of Tigard and Tualatin are by far the fastest growing cities in Washington County (populations increased by ~ a 105% and 103% respectively between 1980 and 1990). (Source: Consolidated Plan, page 3) I ~ p CPAH serves those who live and work in the Tigard-Tualatin area. An estimate of the ~r ~ " population represented in the market area (Tigard) is over 50,000 in 1990, growing to neady ` ~ , 75,000 in the year 2010. I - P - T .,ri L~~y~~.`, -a Persons Living/Working in Tigard, 1990 and 2010 -1 I ` , ism 2010 r ; , ~ ~ Live in Tigard: 32,145 44,078 s~ 0 , , , t Work in Tigard: 23.415 30.343' V^ V. f4 Total: 55,560 74,421 ` r~ s r ,r x 4 _ E 4 ' r Notes: size of population is slightly overstated, since 18% of those who work in Tigard also live in the City. I Y r x f r Sources of informal on: 1990 (U.S. Census). Projections for 2010 (Metro). For Tg~ard's cost of and 209, , an estimated A R r - r x ~ ( r r one-third of workers are in retail sector where wages generally don't support _ j 12 ;f P ~c -+1 ,s st - -zJ- ,3 - - i a F 4 } _ 1- f C y''1 2 - - --ter-- s - -T~. '3. 'v"- t _ h h } *1C A Z V `t; f tE I t _ .,.t it _ _ _ J?Z~. Y_ f 9 { t l Y F _ "vh ,~5 ~ A. 'F 3 fF t - } - -r .e p I I. u~ J r I } _ F - ~ : 4 ,i tY ~ t _ fi ~ f it f t a - The County's Consolidated Plan outlines the increasing need for affordable housing: 'The a increasing population in the county (from 311,554 in 1990 to 416,889 in 2000) will have a ` further negative impact on the cost and availability of rental units an average of 358 low- ' e income and 724 moderate-income renters will be added each year in Washington County through the year 2000." "Families of any size who make less than 80% of median income- - 31%of the households in Washington County--cannot afford market rate rents." (consolidated " Qty t Plan, pages 10 and 22) 3. D. Relationship of Protects to County's Consolidated Plan t s Priorities for Rental Housing in Washington County's Consolidated Plan include: "High Priority: ( Low-income households with severe cost burdens or living in substandard housing; large extremely low-income households living in overcrowded housing." Villa La Paz and Tiffany Court address the highest priority for rental housing, and specifically, the following "Objectives": 1) acquire epsdng rental properties, 2) support construction of r small and large family rental housing (actual count of units produced will be made in the new rn construction or rehabilitation categories), and, 3) weatherizetmake energy improvements to existing units. (Consolidated i)bn, page 42) # 3 ! f h y3 The highest priority indicated for the Homeless in the Plan: "Services for all families and ` individuals, across the full continuum of care." Objectives in this area include: 1) develop additional transitional housing units, and 2) provide supportive services to homeless individuals 1- x4 and families or those threatened by homelessness. (Consoffdated Ptan, page 45} r I r y j For SMial Needs rental housing, highest priority is placed as follows: "Resources are to be i a 4 N { allocated to persons having the greatest need, emphasizing programs and activities that foster a ri ; 3 self-sufficiency and independence." An objective in this area is: to 'coordinate services among ti z y agencies serving target groups." (Consolidated Plan, page 481 s }tom _ e s y y •i gay ~ } ' CPAH's proposed projects (Trffany and Villa) support the highest priorities in the area of t homelessness by targebng a certam number of units for use by families wemer~encyi transitional housing need, and through the ongoing coordination of supportive services (indudemergency rental assistance ) to prevent timelessness. In the special needs area, « z accessiMlity improvements will be implemented in certain ground floor units. The projects also addresses several of the key goals and objectives outlined in the County's h~ Community Development Plan, including: l) ensuring provision of affordable child care for h - incometlualified persons, 2) assist individuals m becoming self-sufficierrt, 3) improve ~ ~ v ? ~ ~ { pedestrian and driver safety (potential sidewalk pro ect on 91st), 4) assist at risk youth in becoming seH-sufficient and law abiding citizens, 5~ reduce busing disaimination, and, 6) ensure that landlords and tenants are aware of their rk3hts and responsifHlities. Of these, the following are considered to be the hghest priority: neighbortiod facilities, street j improvements, and fair housing. {Consolidated Plan, pies 70-75) ~ ~'f This project also utilizes several of the strategies identified in the Consolidated Plan to reduce (j public policy barriers to affordable housing, including: 1) reduction in the impact of fees, service charges and review processes on the cost of housing targeted to low- and moderate income groups, 2) use of financial incentives such as tax abatement (Consolidated Plan, pages 87• r „ F 881 a .13- J k' t t e d~ F Y - - - - 4 C tai 1 ' J t f :F 4 j r ~ l Eg' f. f T W-",2 ,+.Fi [.1 5iS58 4- - - I - - X 0", p $ ar .s,. - . - - - - p -A" g -F kAl, - { k. - .~.~......~e._.,_. ...v..uew..~,.m.. «u+w>4.II•t.£:....e...a. - ♦ .sr z. l---nAa ,HV...a...~.- +J S y-- + fi 1 i ~Y F }4 -F .i It is important to note that the Consolidated Plan includes an estimate of the resource levels ' { needed to cover homeless/housing and community development priority needs areas, and that actual funding falls short of this target by nearly one billion dollars ($880 million). r - PRIORITY NEEDS h Y Activity Area Estimated Dollars Needed-Housing Anticipated CDBG/HOME/ESG, 1996 > - - r - I f 6 Outreach Assessment $500,000 r , p,h , , 'x Emergency Shelters $3,750,000 ~ - Transitional Shelters $8,656,250 Permanent Supportive Housing $3,462500 a i" - Permanent Housing $9,656,250 Community Development $882,686,000 n ; Tofal $M million $3.2 million'* " t w S I 11 11 h , A Note: Source, Consolidated Plan, pages 48 and 50. "Anticipated funding for 1996 is from County's 1996 Action Plan. r~ ` s tS. s 11NEED AND MARKET ANALYSIS -j k x ~~j;a Vie - C..- sF 4. Physical Characteristics of Projects a ` a j, Villa La Paz is bated at 11875 SW 91st Avenue, just off Greenburg Road and Pack ,f r x Highway in Tigard. This 84-unit garden court apartment complex is centrally located, near the County's largest shopping malt, Washington Square, and Tigard's Main Street. It is very close 7 s to Neighborshare, the community action and emergency services program for the area. , s 3- $ 'T * f.Yt.r.rea.,,,~a t e 5 The neighborhood is basically multifamily residential, with some commercial and light fig, ti industrial. It is a convenient location for those working in service and manufacturing centers off t,~-! the Pacific Highway, 217, 72nd Avenue and Greenburg Road corridors. Children in the t e{_ r complex attend Phil Lewis Elementary School (which is also a Head Start Center), Fowler r F h Middle School and Tgard High. A private Catholic school and a day care center are within T,~ walking distance. There are several child care providers within the apartment complex itself. 3 A- I Tri-Met operates several major bus lines near Villa La Paz. The #78 bus, with a stop at E { j x Greenburg & 92nd, runs weekdays every 20 minutes to lake Oswego, Tigard and Beaverton r , r c transit centers and Washington Square. On Pacific Highway, the #12 bus runs between ,Z - x" ty g " , Sherwood, downtown Portland, and (on the eastside of Portland) to the Portland International Airport. It stops at Portland Community College's Sylvania Campus on the way to Portland. - " ' It The 195 bus is an express/peak hours line wit limited stops, operating on Pacific Highway f T, , between Portland and Sherwood. The #45 bus line serves the Tigard Transit Center,, , Washington Square, Garden Home/ Multnomah Village, and downtown Portland. ) ; Villa La Paz is located within Census Tract #309. This area has a higher than average f x concentration of lower-income (median income $26,843 vs. $35,669 citywide) rental , r s households (68% renters and only 28% homeowners). The number of area residents without a ~ ~ -7,~~,-,t,r~~,-r.Ft- I [ -1, high school diploma is notably higher than for Tigard as a whole (15% vs. 9% overall). This 3 r area boasted the second highest concentration of children under 9 of the eight census tracts in Tigard. While this area represents 9% of Tigard's population base, it is home to nearly 16% of 2 ` the city's non-white households. r -14- w r' e r E -o_ - -t. C J S 4 am-wvWGr+} t' 1--, r - - - - { f - - Y _ - - - L _ 1-, - f - - - - - - L GjyrA ' 1 - -d^ y. § S£ f - - - - - 5. - - _ e ,F 2 - - - - _ - ! x . h - - _ .~-f r...... i.; L._..-~::~ f t _ ~ . . e _ _ _ ' ' _ W.L,z = z. - .i' -~.3 I ~ - - . . - . . . - . - _ _ _ t _ a ` , - - - - - - - . 1-11 El, , I . S - - - - - - 2 F - - - - - . ? Y - - - - - i i t Villa La Paz consists of 84 units, with: 12 one-bedroom/one-bath units of 564 square feet, 60 f I two-bedroonVono-bath units of 839 square feet, and, 12 three-bedrooMone•bath units of 1007 square feet. There are four buildings of two and one-half stories, each containing 21 units. All are wood frame, with stucco and concrete exteriors with pitched, composition shingle roofs, built around 1970. There are 7,200 square feet of net rentable area. V - , - A 1,008 square foot community building is located adjacent to the swimming pool and ~ x children's play area in the center of the complex. A barbecue and picnic table are also provided for community use. Forty-two of the units have fireplaces. Listing realtor estimated rents could be raised 810% with some upgrade of the property. The total site contains 3.01 acres or 131,115 square feet. It is zoned single family residential. It has been built at a density of 28 units per acre, and is an allowable non-conforming use. 4 There are 64 carports and a total of 142 parking spaces (for a ratio of 1.7 spaces per unit)- On-street parking is not allowed. =F The current owners, Villa La Paz Investors, Ltd., purchased the property in December 1996 - p-My f- Bahia is S2.471.890 (imDrevementS ~ c-A data price of $1.5 muiion. inne 1,,,, assess n. pro,. at $2,110,690 and land at $361,200). 1995-96 property taxes levied were $33,874: 7 i Tiffany Court is a 96-unit garden court apartment complex located on Bonita Road between ` f z" I Hall Boulevard and SW 72nd Avenue, near the intersection of 1-5 and 217. Several Tri-Met t _ bus lines serve the area. The neighborhood is basically residential (single and multi family) , and commercial. There are several light industrial facilities one-quarter mile east of the { i 1 complex, an SW 72nd Avenue. E } 3 t Tiffany Court consists of 96-units with: 12 one-bedroonVone-bath units of 750 square feet, 72 two-bedroom/one-bath units of 950 square feet, and 12 three bedrooMone bath units of 1,000 Q - squarefeeL , 11 There are four buildings of two and one half stories, each containing 24 units. All are wood ' , . z~ ? frame, with stucco and concrete exteriors and pitched, composition shingle roofs, constructed 1~ in 1969. There are 89,400 square feet of net rentable area An 1,800 square foot recreation r building is located adjacent to a swimming pool and children's play area. None of these 1 E ~ - recreaUonalamenities are currently being uGl¢ed (repairs and improvements need to be `(S , made). There are 12 carports and a total of 114 parking spaces (fora ratio of 1.19 spaces per' r i unit). On-street parking is also allowed on the west side of the property along SW 76th t. t ' ' Avenue. ,x" f 1.. ~ 3 FFL s The total site contains 3.49 acres or 152,024 square feet. It is zoned R-12, multi-family ~ residential allowing a maximum of 12 units per acre. It has been built at a density of 27.5 units ' per acre, and is an allowable non -conforming yse. A portion of the eastern side of the site is located within the 100 year flood plain; however, all buildings have been constructed outside the flood plain. ¢ 3~, The current owner, Anastase Anastassiou, Bonita Holdings, Inc., purchased the property in r s February, 1993, at a price of $2.4 million. The 1995 assessed property tax value is $2.76 t million (improvements at $2.35 million and land at $412,8110)., fr' 7 15 - 1 T t Y y - N 'Sn La ,J i LL T ? P h` - 4 _ Y - -`f `i - ~ - - yV 1r 1' - i 12 rr J - i [ _ ' F - - > r - d ~ : ~ r ~ ~ 1 ~ . ~ - - , , _ - I , - ~ L r I I .1 , r ; : - J _ - - 5 te e:, _ _ " u_._rr,. _ _S i, - z _ W - 3. s . s - _ fp, - r i ti - t ¢ r - ~Xi - _ a i e if s. 7t> - 1, 4, T 3 ~ - , - , M yr r t.. >i*S_ s; v' W,' * a err c nx^«' q"Z" z,,-2'~ " t - t - st x i ~e - -,_k' , _ § 'as, lx~S r ; 3~ , X T .g y F,.,,, Y _ s x - 9 s - Mai -""svH:.,a` s~;:aw,-mx.-r3N'"awa~ .~..r...._.--z.a. - - - c 4 ~C ~''t - Lfi fi =k 5- m` ,s ~ x i 5. Market vs. Project Rents {Z , a 9,~ - y MARKET RENTS VS. CPAN'S RENTS ° +x t ,Fr r* ' r r r a R . hi ~ NW. _ " One-Bedroom Two-Bedroom lhree•Bedroom ~ - t y. `7e s't I ' Current Villa La Paz Rents $355-$435 d - ~ s ~ r ¢ y¢ s CPAHProposedRents $390-$474 $405•$495 $995 ? P_w s~ 5 f~ g7W,4 $486•$569 F- r , `k ; ` Current Tdiany Rents $450,3475 ~ 4 $SOD-$550 ~ $450 $475 t= CPAH Proposed Rents $390-474 $448-$568 $539.6,54 ~ g~+~ ~ l°,; t Win? ` - ~ 9s9 av J _ b' f 3 }3c,"^xiyri==r'iirr 4. ~y 6. Period of Project Affordability r rt s The period of affordability for this project will be 40+ years. Rents will be increased only to { * . COVef fixed onPlatinn cvncn°nc Dµ.~....... r ----..a r-.•~w. c ~crwru Wni be based on Llli IG, not partlClpatl0n in .W&I _ " 0 > cash flow. Finan ang co stsare low ba'sed on use of tax exempt bonds. Rents will raise signifKntty more slowly than they would in a market rate project Annual increases are 'tr .z h ~T ,Ml _ a ' .G = `3'_,`" -"}4 estimated at 1.4°I°, which is 1!3 to 112 under market. ~ e tK u 53gz)r I 1 t~ + i x F 3 g~` fEpL~.,J'~ + C { €al J a+5'fit' , • it Y'xt- i R e - i t }y~ ~'ux r - e is d 7yx~ x ; s aty'4.. ° }rte ,r- r t - a ' as t ste t t a3" - - - 16- c s r; i a '7 - r,-9, rA r r'A" r a J t - s~} - is .a~ , 1F - r FF 14 k V - ~I -',z S 9 r - y ,~,.~..vwe^,: vas ..r .~;+,7+ - ns k .J,"t~s- <,t t ~1 iC.r 3t, rw+^.~,._- - s~. "'e 1~ ` r r~? ' a T f F s YN+x rt t Y _ M 3'r' Mf s'S x ter, ° I y v g~ p,_ , F, , w i , U _ ~ - , ~ - ~ " ~ , a ,f"y, xjR ' A d '"f s - 1. -k f yd P a i rr - +I ,L _ T" f m». - - - - - 4 t r fs x-+ p r - e i '171, , , , ,r, , 1~ - - ~ ~ ~ , , . - - ;1,"u--_;__,;,~~,._ - 7~~4 t-.~.` , I ~ 1- - r~ I j f~ _ - - i H. - FLAK 4 _-.2- f $ - _ _ - - C - t - - - 2r - - 3 „ eke u. 'I~'~ t _ -e t' `,%'f tk, t F ~~5 Ss - fl r - - - - - , fix, - - f s , 4 a r 7. Project Proximity to.. yz r Type of Service Description/Name Distance from Project Other Information ~ t r Z Commercial Major Shopping Mall 75 - 1.75 miles Wash. Square (Grecnburg) a s Services Major Grocery Chain 5 - I mile Albeasons/Safeway (99W) - E.- _ _ s Main Street Retail/Sues. .5- I mile Variety of vendors (Main) t - t } r _ Convenience Store .65 miles Platd Pantr}' (Hall) r , fy Gas Station/Car Wash .65 miles Shell (Main Sir.) - r < w - -1 -1 Restaurants .Smiles Mc Donald's/Playland 4 _ Cleaners .5 miles Various Cleaners 1, - y. - -r - Hospital Tualatin, 5 mins. Legacy Meridian park - Beaverton, 5 mins. St Vincent De Paul I f, Medical .5 miles Various Clinics # ¢ # Optical .5 miles Tig. Ciptometric Clinic . -`1'-:1_,-J_ s_+ _ c I - " t' mD OVment rRard's 10l Largest 1 -zt r Cellter3S Employers: . y-t-*- x _ r t t r l ' Precision Interconnect 16640 SW 72nd manuf. electronic cables a _s y v - Yir:." Nordstrom Washington Sq. Malt department store _ - _ 4 -ILi: j. Fanners insurance 13333 SW 68th insurance company ss w ~,,r Puget Corp. of Oregon 744 SW Bonita manuf. plastic inject. prod. " , ° ~ 11 Kam Automated Office Systems 12100SWGardenH. office equipment dealer ' , r ~J~,- Meier & Flank Washington Sq. Mall -department store _ US West Direct 10200 SW Grecnburg publishing company t Physician's Medlab 6600 SW Hampton -outpatient blood testing -'-~y L Coe Manufacturing 7930 SW Hunziker -plywood machin. manuL a u ` Fiskers 14200SW72nd -cutlery manuf. 7 '4 _'il - , c,~ Via, s ransportatlon Tri•Met Bus Imes: 14 blocks Pacific Hwy & Grcenburg s Serv Ices M78. t2.95. as -t ~ a Ptld. lnternaU. Airport 25 minutes Accessible with no-ttansfer " cs 3 - - onTri-Mel line 1112 & r 4 "-cog - S Phil Lewis F~ementary 1.25 miles also a Head Sort Ctr. : r 1, - Fowler Middle School .65 miles _ r,- y - , ' Tigard High School 1.5 miles a ,-k~ r 'r t par playground c -s t" t 3 { Parks ecreabo Commercial Park 25 - I mile local WPIaY8round ` - f . Cook Park .5 - 1.5 miles 57 acres (city's largest of 9) a cr [ r S+ r s I 11 a NICeS Neighborshare 12750 SW Pacific Hwy. emergency services (food, t , y • rent, utilities,ctcJ i r I Head Swart .Phil Lewis Elem. -coordinated broad-based r y a 'L -7 , services for tow-income h ra , A parents of children 3-5 yrs. f " r 1' 1.11 Tual. Valley Mental Health Tigard & Beaverton -based on residents' needs - A Tigard Senior Center 75 miles ESL, t , sz r ;i ttT _ - 5 ? Y , . s I J , , z e ' 'I - t t i A i i - _ A. _t- r - F f 5 Y 4c _ t P;F'':'x` ~ ..yi/,'Y' 1. k ~rM3 T i~ 41- - - t k -fit M .9 x f J r a r '7 - ~ - _ - ' s --4 2 --k _ 4 1 ! '4 - 'h } r - - , - t r7 . f - ' r, F i - - -E 7 ` r r U 'I, ~:,,L ~ ~ , , ~ . _ , - -1 ' r~ ' r - - ~ iJ 7 a . - _ qtr ~~R' - " 1,'y' r'Zn~~" , -7~ L r z_ . , _ - F C t - - - - - - - - _ - 3 4 _ _ - - - T : K S 4- - - - - _ 1 L EEE n d 3 k f6 " & Anticipated Social Services: , I . x, _ An J s o opu atul ntlc pate Uclpate ttapate f~z Services Outcomes Provider(s) t Child Care I&R Information and referral Matches betwcen Metro CC Information and `F_ r a registered child cart individuals with children Referral $ _ rovrders/ ro rams and care roviders in area - ,p - v Affordable Child Care Cooperative child dev- Facilitates employment Community Action (Head ; - ,ft Stan) clopment center (including and job training 1 i ' for rents Professional Providers ; . ` c- ri18A HctdStart/Latchke o rtunitics r Drug and Alcohol Drug and alcohol Reduction in incidenu Tualatin Valley Mental K' c Issues counseling and educational related to drug/alcohol Health 7 programs; including AA use; reductions in:_ c v~ f and NA meetings on criminal activity, family ~ 4 4, d sfunction 'ob loss _ Emergency and on One-time or ongoing Ensure that tenants are Neighborsharc - - _ 8 Rental ASSISfBnCe accictanm with rental ab!_ t^o re.T.ai : in ho e and 6z- x' - payments based on tenant's despite temporary set- Dept. of Housing Services I . family situationlincome backs ; ' 1 Emergency lity One-time utility payment Reduce burden of winter Neighborshare r..a w' ~ - 1 Assistance assistance heating costs; prevent I k _ °I disconnection of services Emergency Food Emergency food boxes; Prevent hunger & Neighborshare (screening); z ' _ , t Assistance 'Brown Bag` program with malnutrition; rovide St Vincent de Paul ;i surplus food, nutritional food and nutritional Tigard FISH _ ' t' info & reci s information - Advocacy Related to t&R, Legal Assistance Assurance that tenants Neighborshare. I fr , 2 i its th y are Including Oregon Health Icg [ly eligible foreon O~pening~Doors Services, and ey # _ Plan timely basis " : r Medical Assistance; Advocacy on individual Improved overall health; Meridian Park Hosp. Sax H . Health Care Education issues; screening and reduction in preventable OSU Extension Services r x education diseases Cancer Societ ~ . ',-`1 11 Job Training & Preparation for work force; increased level of Oregon Human 3"` _ # 'l Placement career counseling-, resume employment, higher Development Corp.; - to ~ ~ T prepatration;Job-finding eamingcapacity Employment Division f . and training assistance sr.. Fam Y Ca a management for two Attain positive goals and Neighborshare r t lli;~ Program years to ensure goal-setting decrease negative cycles > . resultin in emer encies a , ` L~ - ~~11 , , ,.-I - , , Mental h Individual and group Attain, or maintain Neighborsharc / SAFAH - y ~ _I s~ Counseling counseling mental health; support pro gram (involves Lewis & families Clark interns V~ _ - parent Education Cl uses and support Build healthy family OSU Extension Service structure for parents systems; prevent and Lutheran Family * q d sfunctiontenant's housin/sc Lion Services Nurturing Program x - t _ Tenant Education Classes on budgeting, self Improve g Community Action advocacy ,resources, apt. maintenance; positive Orgam~ation ' s' , F , maintenance' h-hold safety rental records _ H is I _ Media n 10r Mediation for variety of positive tenant-landlord community Action I ,Y, _ l.,andbrd/fenant ISSUES tenant-landlord roblcros relationslsoluuons organization & Legal Aid " 1, I i I - , I I , I!, ] " - r ~ , L---' ~L DomestleVblenr a Support Oroupstoutreach support for those who Domestic Violence r f [1, " - _ arc/have faced dom. cio. Resource Center l . a; } s' wrr t r r _ 't _ 1 t- I i N F ~ f , i _ t , - " ~ - - , ,jl . ~ I . ' i ~ . r . I r r . ~ . : : ~ , I ~ ~ I , ~L r . ~ , , . L I ' A r _ri,~' , f" .~,,~,i r, , i E7 - - - - - + ~ ' , 4 - L ' ~ ' ~ , , L , ~ ' ~ i , ~ r - . r , ~ I I . ~ ~ - , ' - - I ` r I'_ - "'6z', - : ~ , g', . - . 7 i, , . ~ , , . ' 1~. ' ' ' , L - ~ . . I I I r 4 ' , , , _2 , , L ~ - , , I - L ~ L I . - I ~ , , ~ ~ , - i - ~ I I - I . ~ L l~ - , , I - , Z - # _ - - r . - F .A..., r. _ .':.mss::_ `-r^4_ ~-'~-~T'T--rte err Tom, tip. Ty t,.nn,e +r.,.+-mot - - - 3. - , - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - t - - y 5 kk.yy'r.`d ,t~r'tY'"9'.,hx 'a' - 1 '4 3- _ - + - t i ,sty } z 4'k-'mat _ a'r 11 -1 -1 ~ s ri ~-,,,.....w N_,r _ I izt r x ,f .Y q i 4% x, - f .k s r ~ COMMUNITY/NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT ,-4 * . a > r, 9. Community Suppor! a CPAH is active in an active participant in community affairs in Tigard and Tualatin. Project r presentations were made at meetings of the City Council, Citizen Involvement Teams, E s s : Chamber of Commerce, Tigard Christian Ministries, County Brown Bag Housing Network, 'Y Housing Advocacy Group and others. Partnerships with the City's Police Department and t 4 Portland General Electric have been outlined. f' 'r1 j rt ~ While concerns about criminal activity appear to be less in the area surrounding Villa than they 1 t I are around Tiffany, CPAH will partner with the Police Department to address security desgn - - x 3 k r i ti" 1- s issues and community policing options at both sites. r 4 57 (:PAI.1 will pneart An o..w,uia.,..a G_......-.enchai Ek....w. nunen n=. Corn..........:ry e rwwhh v ..ni..~za....w..h, _ - c,.,.w ..,it~N. h h ohhu h la.tay,, v. ICSD and imuritn...hya i7171'1711.7-01171S to address weatherization, energy education and pre paid metering options for tenants. Both , projects serve large, lower-income families who historically have had problems paying their i i B utility bills. Both serve families and individuals with a variety of economic and social needs, ; %5 5 { 5 t' Fh "p 1-, f ? thereby requiring a strong partnership with Neighborshare. t , Eli ~ t j Because of the concentration of young children at Villa La Paz, the need for sidewalks and bike ) MT, 5 paths has been highlighted. CPAH is aware that the City of Tigard may submit a CDBG z, funding application this Fall for the construction of a sidewalk on 91st Avenue adjacent to Villa La Paz. CPAH will work closely with the City to identify any partnership or volunteer € opportunities associated with this project (i.e. volunteer landscaping). ~ j Z -t £-R _ At Tiffany Court the population is somewhat older (teens), and significant gang activity has ri~~ { le, ,7, t been noted. CPAH has approaced La Casa del Futuro, a youth gang intervention program, for r assistance in dealing with this issue. n 1 7 4 On-site child care was identified as a potential service at both sites. CPAH will examine the f, T feasibility of cooperative day care and/or latchkey (before and after school) programs. 77 , z E, _ f , i CPAH has received support for these projects from the City of Tigard and expects to receive } ~ support from the relevant Citizen Involvement Teams. Any and all concerns about the projects u will receive thorough and timely responses. CPAH will seek tenant and area representatives y;,z: u 5 for its governing board and committees. t 5 h 4 t - - 6, - d 3- _ 1 - fs h t7~ - l J } - TC t » F , FY i Y t 1 {4 s t a 7 - a - ¢ Y V, FtY4" rl r r " F A , 19- s r } V 4 - F 1 { J f ~ a ♦44q i A - F¢ f} jq k - t r F'' - - % K 5 - 4 L';!S- - - - . , ~ ~ , ~ ~ . I . . I. , I f. "I'~~l.--~,",;,~-~~~,"".,~.,,,,-~~~,~,~ A-- 1 _ Y yz _ k t L a r 'X - ~F 3 - - S; fff s . , _ r rt t t ; , r Fk~ k a ` '7_ F , , _ , ~ _ rL R I I _ ~ , ~ I - : ~ b . - ]J , I - . ~ I r ~ ~ . ~ I : - ~ ~ ` - , , J, . ~ ~ , r~~r. . , - - t --p - I - J _ - - - u 3 -$-i , _ - _ - - [Y .fxR TT ""k-- k t Y - - - 4 Z 40. Po arWaf community-based funding sources S, P Source Value Contact Status X - I ~ - Payment in Lieu of up to $33,874 annually at Villa Mayor James Nicoli, or, Discussed with City Council on a Taxes (PILOT) and $37,840 at Tiffany City Administrator, Bill 2/20/96; they were receptive Monahan i rte,., Waived, Reduced or unavailable at this time City Administrator, Bill Discussed with City Deferred Permits or Monahan Administrator on 3/21196; told Plans Examination Fees to bring to City Council 4 _ Section 8 Rental based on per unit rents and Wash. Co. Dept. of Housing CPAH will work with DHS to Assistance individual household income: Servirpc, Directm Sts-an b=.-.a -••-"tid lurid;ord availability of subsidy Wilson under Section 8 and will E x { £ } 4uau, tt - actively seek tenants vn- Transitonad Housing / based on per unit rents and Ne' hborshare, Man Y ~ ig Manager CPAH will reserve up to 15 SAFAH Program individual household income; Carla Tungwenuk units for Transitional Housing; avalabirdy of subskly; $30,000 no maximum number of value of case mgmt. & allow. families under SAFAH (could r r ¢ be30+ z~ qa s x Yrf Rebuild America/ up to $3,000 per unit Lynda Tatum, Portland Application to be submitted to i WeatherfzaUon, Ercerrggyy (weather¢atlon, energy General Electric; Dept. of Energy in early April Education and Pre`Pald educator/counselor, program Leon Laptook Community - Metering evaluator) Action Organization £ $ia , Security Audit and estimated at $1,500 Kelley D. Jennings, Tigard IeBer of commitment to ti~ rk;~ K p ' 3 =~axr DeslgnofCommunity Crime Prevention /Public conduct work and build Policing Plan Information Officer partnerships j z F . On-Site Health estimated at $2,500 Linda Pedersen, Community Letter of commitment to provide r Education and Outreach Coordinator, services to be identified based F [ screening Meridian Park hospital on tenants' specific needs [ r ' ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY, t 11. Development Team 3 Sam Galbreath serves as CPAH's development consultant/project manager. Sam is nationally j recognized as an innovative housing program developer who has raised over $100 million to t 1 ' support the development of housing and community facilities. His clients include: Portland 4 Development Commission, Housing Authority of Portland, Downtown Community Housing, ¢ r Inc., Northwest Oregon Housing Authority, Southeast Uplift and REACH Community Development, Inc. Sam has worked with a variety of community-based housing groups to < t 1 negotiate for the acquisition of property, structure financial packages and oversee the j a development process. Sam will coordinate all working arrangements and agreements with the ! following team members. t -20- € ~ j .1 J Y F j. J T iwt S - - - { ~x F 4 ,.z 'i.~~- J:'" .,.elf `...1 ~...t t. ..c_1._L.!-.....-..~ Ll' _7 7: ~ 1 t YFrr.aYa.L....Y-..wr.er_.....__.... - - _......_...-.u+..t..a.rn.wu _ ....-.....,_r.r...-,(t.aw.M .-?rx ~"r"'u."t'• - I - t t t f ^r S 4 ~ ~S i slow Aron Faegre, of Aron Faegre Associates will directly manage architectural services for CPAH. He practices as an architect, civil engineer, and landscape architect. With a five-person staff, Aron's firm has been providing services in the Portland area since 1983. Aron has a strong y* z interest in public works and community projects. During recent years the firm has provided services for the YMCA of Columbia-Wilamette, Housing Authority of Portland, Central City 7 Concern, City of Portland Bureau of General Services, Park Bureau, Fire Bureau, Police I Bureau, State of Oregon Division of State Lands, Park Bureau of the City of Lake Oswego, - Portland Development Commission and the Port of Portland. Richard P. Tolvstad, President of FIT & Associates, Inc., serves as CPAH's contractor. x A Richard has a solid background in commercial construction with over eighteen years experience. Prior to s~ ,frog R T & Associates, inc., he was employed by P&C Construction as s aproject manager. Rich graduated from Oregon State University w!th a Bachelor of Science z z degreein Construction Engineering Management r to that, he completed a carper! apprenticeship, gaining exposure to all stages of new and remodel construction at the field ; level. Over the last ten years, Rich has handled a variety of projects where his responsibilities included: estimatvalue engineering, scheduling, and project management. Projects varied l in size from several thousand building and cons truc tion typesto seven million dollars and included a dnrerse spectrum of _ . i Doug Blomgren, Randall Bateman, Michael Chellis, and Mark L Bonnet of the Preston" Gates & Ellis law firm will represent the project with broad and deep backgrounds in real estate i law, finance, partnerships and low-income housing development. The Preston team will be a under the direction of the firm's managing partner, Douglas C. Blomgren. Mr. Blomgren's 1 } r practice involves low-income housing development, non-profit corporations and real estate litigations. Mr. Blomgren serves on the Housing and Community Development Commission for ! Portland, Gresham and Multnomah County. He is council to a regional housing authority in t OA connection with its development of tax credit projects. These four attorneys, as well as others VQ-m k in the firm (which consists of approximately 240 attorneys in eight offices on the West Coast , and in the District of Columbia), will be available to assist CPAH. Their municipal bond and r ` kk. finance attorneys are the most experienced in the Northwest. r t..a + d ~ { fib„ a k Randall Bateman, Parner at Preston Gates & Ellis, has a practice focusing on real estate and , commercial finance. He has represented a broad range of lenders and developers in real estate transactions including Hartford Insurance Group, Credit Slvisse, New York Life Insurance Company, Allstate Life Insurance Company and Simpson Housing. ` k y Michael R. Chellis, Partner at Preston Gates & Ellis, is one of the tax partners of the firm and is an expert in partnership taxation. He is council for the Washington State Housing Finance Commission in connection with its administration of their low income housing tax credit j program. 1 r. Mark L. Bonnet, Associate at Preston Gates & Ellis, practices in the area of real estate and business law. His practice includes the formation of limited partnerships, limited liability , companies and other development vehicles. -21- v I r s r A f GE E i r r r _ ~~i _ _..mow W _ _~_3_ _ _,i..~~., .~......~..aiw-*L-':`_ ~ yr;=. u,:: • _ - , . 4 ..a° .F 4. J S - RNARRIT WJ3 zxS- f - - .1 - A - fit- ✓75rc".T r t 4 m$ sr` - - - - r - - - - - - b r - - - - - - - - - f'- Y,.M -.,'k',, 4, - 2 r, _ _ _ _ 4.3k ` t4 P A - - _ - _ - yyt - ,t`~ - 1....,,< »u»u:,f,:3...n.,s ,.a.,-:..,...,._y,+ax....,...~_____.._.._..-. t f zti ¢ r § F , t Thomas Brenneke, President of Guardian Management Corporation, will oversee that firms' ~ involvement in ongoing property management. In addition, Mr. Brenneke's firm will be } k r ti.r performing baseline surveys and coordinating required notifications in connection with the ; Uniform Relocation Requirements on the project Guardian Management is among the' region's largest property management firms and is the leader in management of Section 42 fi j (tax credit) and other publicly assisted projects. As such, they are expert in the special i-, CE) a s administrative and reporting requirements of these types of projects. The firm has 225 projects - , containing 11,500 units under management. The firm is highly respected among developers, ~ sunders and owners of projects and has repeatedly been sought out by nuhlin anemias and the ' , - .,opal uuCrn or Housing and Urban Development to rescue troubled projects and tackle a I -,~':~~7:,~~-.~,.,,~~,,~',",": .:i PF , ~ r 1_ those with the greatest challenges. 1711, ~ z C. Lavelle, of Lavelle Geotechnical, P.C., will serve as CPAH's environmental and registered ~ _ Civil Engineer, and holds numerous other registrations and affiliations. Craig has had ' ' r , responsibility as project manager and principal engineer for a variety of 9eotechnical ` ' t 1 `1-. M engineering studies involving slope stability, deep foundations, underpinning and site drains e, 1=i s as well as level I environmental site assessments. In addition to his own firm, he has worked < for Golder Associates, Applied Technology, Inc., Rittenhouse Zeman & Assoc. Inc., and Alaska s p~g { Resource Sciences. r- ~k m , j: rt . J 12. Project Experience , n r 1 - , Z~ ,~t 9 i Villa and Tiffany will be the first development projects for CPAH. Accordingly, an experienced , _ , j development consultant/project manager was selected (Sam Galbreath and Associates). Sam tix 1 1 has provided development assistance to a variety of non-profit organizations in recent years producing five completed low-income houising projects currently operating (298 units, over $14 ; ; r million), and sa projects ects under development or in PredeveloPment stages 347 units, over $23_ ' million). Of the five completed projects, four received OHCSD funding, and of the slot under 5 development, three are, or will be, using Low Income Housing Tax Credits. Accordingly, Sam .r Galbreath Associates is knowledgeable regarding the requirements and procedures ofr managing projects which enjoy OHCSD participation. :r 4 r _ CPAH believes that its affiliation with Sam Galbreath Associates, coupled with the familiarity , and experience of its development team and CPAH board members with direct development ~ ' ; + experience, along with the use of OHCSD and HOME grants, bans, tax credits and bond ` ~ financing, assure that the desired bevel of development and operation expertise is provided. j '1 - `s,- 11R_ I 11 r f 1 , ti 3 k,-'' Vim. f `i }mss M 3 l x' ;)~.53^YI } L - t - -ztl F } „i2 ?4„5 $ - r , 5 w; 't, -Y-. 7~.^~ - ry f A?Y I 22 4 z t d 2 € S _ - h _ i€€ M f , f 4 - - I - i3 5 F 1 _ .7 . k i~, - Zi 1 t, , . , . , L , : : " L : ~ ' ~ ~ ~ " . .,i:: I 1 i t {Yx - - - - 'E _"'1,'T-' . ~ .r'-: j ` 1 , - , r . r I ; , , ~ ~ ~ ~ I - 11 : ' L L~ r - ~ - 11 r , - " ~rl~ . ~ 1 , ~ , - - - - , - , , M _ Z -it 'F. - 'Y i etc t1~ ~ - ~_--..--_c^~, _ 't" `3 ,.e_. L ...L .c ._yrr. ss....~t__...4_ ._-3.~~~ax. ..v. _ r __r_'._. - ,L__. i.n u. _ ti ..::LY~i,.. _~.....c .y _ i.r..r.~_.. _.._..t- i i Community Partners for Affordable Housing, Inc. i Board and Staff Qualifications CPAH has considerable experience in the areas of affordable housing and community services. ,Y Jeanette Sander, Development Program Manager for the Housing Authority of Portland (HAP), is CPAH's curent Board President. Jeanette has had direct involvement in affordable housing programs for fifteen years, including her work as HAP's Development Program Manager since 1985. t = Site has wordinateu devctoprnient of Tiariy aiivrdable housing projects, inciuding completing four HOME new construction projects and one HOME rehab project. Marge Jozsa, CPAH's immediate Past President, is a commissioner on the Multnomah Housing and Community Development Commission, and is well-versed in housing issues. She also previously founded and managed for six years a shelter for battered women and their children. Margaret Nelson was most recently an Assistant Vice President in First Interstate % Bank's Community Banking division. In this capacity, Margaret established relationships with t a variety of players in the affordable housing arena, and provides expertise to the board in the t area of housing finance and project structuring. Loren Kerkof, O.F.M., is a Catholic Priest with 26 years involvement in social services to low { income people and community action groups. It was through Father Kerkofs initiative that CPAH was formed. Carla Tungwenuk, Manager of Neighborshare/Community Action Organization, has more than 10 years experience in social service work including seven years in the Tigard/Tualatin area. She has served as Coordinator between church and community services. Neighbors hare is the primary point of contact for low and very-low income families , r and individuals in the TgardlTualatin area who are seeking assistance with basic needs. t ~•~s'f Mary Owen has been an active volunteer in housing and human service organizations for ~ k f r r ' Tigard for the past sic years, and served as CPAH's first President. She is currently a medical staff services professional for Legacy Health Services. Mary was formerly employed in a rehabilitation workshop for mentally and physically handicapped adults in California and participated in establishing a residential group home for clients sponsored by the workshop. , a Doug Plambeck is a MBA/CPA working for Portland General Electric as a Business Analyst in Corporate Accounting and Reporting: He has worked previously with Oregon Accountants for a the Public Interest Marianne Potts is the Accountant for Tigard-based Ash and Associates, and has been an active volunteer in the area for many years. Marianne brings database and business management expertise to the board. t k Sheila Greenlaw-Fink, CPAH's executive director, is responsible for the day-today operations t k of CPAH. Sheila has over ten years experience with affordable housing programs, ranging from hands-on direct service as Multnomah County's Project Self-Sufficiency Coordinator to broad policy work for the National Council of State Housing Agencies as Director of Program Information and Research and Policy Analyst. In both Portland and DC she worked with a variety of community-based groups. In DC she served as President of Housing Opportunities , for Women, a CDC that owns and operates group homes for formerly homeless women, most of whom are chronically mentally ill. In her previous position as education director for the American Public Power Association she managed a budget of nearly $700,000 annually. Sheila will continue to work with CPAH's organizational development consultant, Marc Smiley. Marc is President of Reach Community Development, and has significant experience with nonprofit development issues. Marc has created and managed a variety of public education and outreach campaigns and designed fundraising, and staff/board development plans. _ I t r 1 -23- y 3 n- a ~C- f-- _ i5.'y 111 ~ -Y _ 11 I 11 Ss ,r.a~e r;•-+%q,g.s •se- ?,.:ate-.,J,.~_...._» ._~_r'...-. - - s r i` s. ex i ¢s 3- I y t z l i ~ ~ "Axe . n 11 At ~ rL m. "r., T":ii:`,"~' y~'.m Vii. 3,, F'r» k.tw'?.~ ,k x * 4 ' " 5 W5 ~ r s =s_' Community Partners for Affordable Housing, Inc. k - i p , , Board of Directors Roster } t # ~ a , {t y'~3 L z Jeanette Sander, President Development W , E- n Program Manager , x -4#~ 19259 SW 55th Court Housing Authority of Portland r- y ~ ; r, Tualatin, OR 97062 $ .7" P,- t _x~ z Marge Jozsa, Immediate Past President Executive Director . ~ 4 , 14980 SW 103rd Street Neighborhood Health Clinics d $ t> fi Tigard, OR 97224 , 1 A 1' 3 ~g tai q, 1 x- : aCw,w,2:}i'~:'z*. u Marianne Potts, Secretary Accountant ~ _I ~i t 20390 SW 86th Avenue Ash & Associates z Tualatin, OR 97062t~ , w r _ A-- t ? s F, Douglas Plamtsedc, Treasurer CPA, Business Analyst, Corporate a t ° ~ z 10600 SW Starr Accounting & Reporting -1 U- M, - ~ , Tualatin, OR 97062F Portland General Electric 3.. 4 r ) ~ Loren Kerkof, O.F.M. Catholic Priest 5 ~ , 9905 SW McKenzie St Anthony's { Tigard, OR 97223 u t,, b Margaret Nelson Community Development Lender . 8134 SW Ashford Street 46 tom' a i L t Tigard, OR 97224 ! ~ . _ -Y.r S E~ Mary Owen " z - Medical Staff Services Professional x w - ` y 760 Timberline Drive Legacy Health Services ~ "I Lake Oswego, OR 97034 , a a ~ a , Carla Tungwenuk Man er ~ ~ 5960 SW 41st Avenue aagg N 4L Portland, OR 97221 CAOlNeighborshare Office I'll .11. I , s a n a 1, - - " I'- 194~ " L~ [ - `a +ajars ' .a1 kr _ -a• 's,.~,7 E i 24, r - a. f- , J v -24- 4i 4- T a r 3 t ,.tea ! Us- l 5 . ~i t , W, I - ~`D L J ,.,3' r,',.g r{ -:rT:;''•:rEX qt 1 <-,'r=ft .J-: try .'s'. ----"'rr. s.,rvk,.o mq.r..t«-.a..c _ -f, ~1 rj "l X y 7" 114k I - gif! ',t'-k i f 1. Y 485 - i ry 2 tom- Y*r1f a y `s'S Il~~ .Y x- tY4,, Yj - f i e r L C - d- x_s < 1 ~ ~ : ~ ---,,.r ~P,'~ - r , , ~ I _ ~ x jji~~ , i . , . I '7 _ W! { G'«?'f YF { - - - ..C3 'h l r fY "1- i 54~ 5,' I x a _..tu . , .~.5r,c -a _ .r _ ter.... _ t-. , _ - - - - _ _ z zx'^ ~ja"1'Ll - x 1 7 Cf^ ern S r - _ 2 ' sE - y - - - - - _ S Z _ 'vr~.,'~S . ,-'s,.s' - r u _ .u,•- _ . . .............a...e..._....-.- ~ •v' - - t a-r 4;k4~in, ~iS,Sy r'%' °.'F-.?f_ _ :;A - ,4; ',~.r S• 'z_;ss J- - _ . • a + r y+.l:?x,,' - ern. : - - - »;i:„isy- _ i:, t c f i CPAH DEVELOPMENT TEAM ~ ~ _ ~ h ~ ~~-'t . tis a . , 3 ,s.. Development Consuftent Partnership Council_ Environmental & Geotechntt~l ~ "r" _ y b y ti Y I r - rv'SS`fc.7:r any Sam Galbreath Randy Bateman. Partner - E q- , a Sam Galbreath Associates Preston, Gates & EJlis Craig Laviclle, Principal - ; ' - ; - i 7720 SW Macadam Ave. #20 see bottom left Lavielle Gcotechnical t - _ 5 q l ~ s Portland, OR 97219 2313 NE Alameda Street ; 244-3435 (E'. 2447416) Tax Attorney Portland, OR 97212 ~ ' ' 287-0511 (F: 282-7671) - CPAH Housing Committee Michael Chcllis v - 1 _ Preston, Gates & EJhs AApnraisef - - a ` - - s Jeanette Sander see bottom left ~ K; s Development Program Mgr. Mark D. Berry - , Housing Authority of Pttd. Partnershlo Tax Advisor Mark D. Berry & Associates 1 135 SW Ash 1420 SW Broadway ro Y~- a * , Portland, OR 97204 Mike Silver, Fanner Portland, OR 97201 .a . ° " y{ 2734514 (F: 228 4872) De(oitte & Touche 343-2925 (F 243-2175) l(ISWFifthAvc.,A3900 g - ,rte a e tip; Margaret Nelson Portland, OR 972043635 Cost Estimator s x f 8134 SW Ashford Sir. 222-1341(F:228-4979) ? f-,i ~ r - a Tigard, OR 97224 James A. Gerde, AIA a rr 3 $~fh _ 624 7937 Architect Architectural Cost Consultants % , Y ' 6441 SW Canyon Ct, #103 - 11-- S » {i"r j~ 6 Carla Tungwenuk Aaron Faegrc Portland, OR 97221-1458 x kr n _n r- - Manager Aaron Faegre & Associates ^_97-7210 (F: 297-7187) `h e~y - ds-~-rq y _ r = -.f Commit tyAction Org/ 520SW Yamhill i~ • Tigard Neighborshare Office PoNand, OR 97204 General Corrhactor l - 12750 SW Pacific Hwy. #118 222-2546 3 - Tigard, OR 97223 Rich Tolvstadt President - a v 5 r 598-0505 (F: 598-8923) Strttetttral Engineer RT & Associates, Inc. f y 11858 SE Solomon Ct. f ; r ~t Sheila Greenlaw-Fnk Af an Associates, Inc Portland, OR 97266 ; CPAH Fs ecutive Director 4320 SW Barbur Blvd., #175 TT7 8096 (F: 788 3124) r, ~-1 r PO Box ?3206 Portland,-OR 97219 y~:M_ , _ I ? Tigard OR 47281 2442450 (F: 2442887) HOME Funding Contact -11 x-,`. 968-2724 (Fax: 598-8923) ,5~ a .11 r Home: 245-1182 TitteComtranv Todd Adkins ~ 15 , Housing Services Specialist . e, i CorD4rate Attnmett Sherri Stray Dept of Housing Services ~ a 3 t Escrow Officer 11 t NE Lincoln Str., #200 L r , r~, ~ a r C Mark Bonnett Fidelity National Title Co. Hillsboro, OR 97124 ¢ ` i-I I" -1 t j 14 r' RX Preston, Gates &Ellis 900 SWFfthAvenue 693~f777(F:6934795)-g 3200 US Bancorp Tower Portland, OR 972041235 ~~,x~~ 111 SW Fifth Avenue 222-2424(F: 227-2274) CMG Fundlttg Contact , ,xt ( Portland, OR 97205 s nr - t 228-3200 (F: 248-9085) Pmoerty Management Co. Shana Aucsmith }ii ] I Sr. Comm. Develop. Spec. { .r_ F ! T ] L.an"se Attomey Tom Brenncke, President Office of Community Dev. 't - rx~ ~ a # Guardian Management Corp. 155 N. First Ave., # 170 t ` - , , y z ],_I-~~_ _Y ~ . , - l~ ~ r Tim Sercomb 4380 SW Macadam Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 - - x Preston, Gates & Ellis Suite #380 693-4437 (F: 81-2983) " see above Portland, OR 97201-6486 F, b "tA _ r t 242-2350(F:242-3648) p ry,~,=-»- 25 Ai }r ~ '1 G 5- d-_ rk j 5 S 'C ' ff 1 - I r~ a r v ib R., _ X ' 1 e l h - T r f I~ £ r - - is `FL - _ Y N 4 4 {t{t{~~~~ - A „t 1 - d f t, _ E `y t. - - t 'tli- 1 r 4 r f r _ - ~ - - - - - L ' - ' ~ - , ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ I I L ~ .1 I M t~~r 'LG- r~ I I , I . I . I I- ~ - ~ I - ~ ~ j - 77- - . _ _ _z _ . -._,-4 - - _ _ _ I- 6i WA K. I'M 1 2, -1 W4 q.~1r0t'yx 1 K .xzz" tea. +<s' sv t - _ - CE _s , q XA §«s 3.r "n' - - - ' - - v ^rhh IN, tint re ` till s om-v z sr- OHCSDContacts a> s -a.6 2 Vince Chiotti _ku _ re,nr ' CDC Pmgnun Rep. r z e k 1600 State Street s % ~4 " Salem, OR 97310-0302 4z R, * t 986-2113 (F: 98&20_0) I Portland: 731-8354 r '4-'g,-s Victor Smcitz MF Program Manager Housing Finance Section t4a~ 4f- Mm. u as above ti°t 98b-2053'' , s v TiffenySellerBBroker Tasso Anastassiou, Seller r Bonita Holdings. Inc.> inl~r SFr f` ~b >s-` - x 4252 Musqueam Drive Mi ty~ r " f $ Y aG Vancouver, BC V6N 3R7 Canada PIR 60 4126 1-6747 s ~ ~ z _ t Cellular. 6041961-0491 t _ Lewis Arnold, Broker ' Marcus & Millichap ttr to 07- 1800 SW First Avenue, 110 S li { n Portland, OR 97201 $ r e _ + " ' s 220-2333 (F: 210-2155) W 2 ' Villa Seller 8 Broker ` LIL d s~ r Villa La Paz Investors, Ltd.) C r t - _ PO Box 1989 r' Lake Oswego, OR 97035 z t r 636.1163 g v t f John Ferguson Selling Broker Tilbury, Ferguson & ) % k r r Neuburg,lnc. a ~~a - 'S 530 NW 3rd Avenue, 112 Portland, OR 97210 s ° t¢nf [ t 224-6743 Mg t ` r erg *E 5 z Bob Zink h' Usting Broker r Kr 'M tt-- r ; Zink Realty f sw 445 Second Sir. 2141 VIV .V Lake Oswego. OR 97034 zr tk'''} ou fr 2 635-3998 _ 2G _ h- z 1€"ke''sk k a + 4 s' A. €k parr -I a/~i - ~ f kf'.~~~,Sx r 'W I - C 3 4 M 4v'r,r` i~;n 4•y"3m~- - F' s - - ,tea -;,z;~' ai - E", t {'`tr a o =*n-~•-'- - - 1 - :..;,w. .t:..- -,.,_.axa.r~ tT~~d:~~., 3 Y sz_ _7-.y _7..__~ i L _ - - : _ _ a wu't 6~ t t' y - S - tj - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ i _ t f. - k' y„ .u.~,_ _ _ . _~.x+~---_-_ - ._.....,..,..,_-...~..-.._.r.- _ z+~,..., _ f 7___~ t R x - ! 13. Assumptions Regarding Funding for These Projects: 4' ' Protect Cost Discussion; j Project development costs were determined through direct consultation with key project _ pa,«;pa ,ts inc!!d!rig the property sellers, contractor, architects, title company, development team members, funders, public agencies, uiiiiues, appraisers and specialists in commercial real estate. The acquisition cost represents the option price: the reasonableness of the option price in each y case was determined in conjunction with Mark D. Barry, Appraisers, based on analysis of ten . 'I comparable sales in the immediate Tigard area adjusted for current conditions of the subject operty. Related costs were developed by Fidelity National Title. Special consideration was given to assure that the project budget reflects all the requirements of the State of Oregon Risk Share Program, especially as they relate to operating, repair/replacement and contingency i " ksa I j reserve funds. " ; - F Land use and building permit estimates were provided by the City of Tigard. Environmental, soils , ~ ' ! and survey costs were estimated by Lavielle Geotechnic and W. B. Wells, Associates. Architect- , y ural and engineering fees were estimated by Aron Faegre and Associates with legal, accounting t and cost certficatbn estimates provided by Preston Gates & Ellis and Debitte & Touche. - The appraisal estimate was provided by Mark D. Barry and Associates. „ t Lender costs, including inspections, title insurance and loan fees as well as letter of credit costs in amounts appropriate for operating reserve were developed through conversations with = our potential bond issuers: The State of Oregon and Washington County, plus discussions s ~ : a ~ with Key Bank. Title costs including recording, owners extended coverage and lender a ~F endorsement were provided by Fidelity National Title. Tenant relocation reflects temporary moves of tenants within the complex consistent with i N~, d F ; project staging requirements. , a , _ g' Construction costs are based on RT & Associates estimates, consistent with the scope of work I jointly outlined by the architect, developer and contractor as a result of on site inspection and y II the developer's objectives to provide least cost, longest tens affordability related to operation of r 3 the project while meeting or exceeding all City and County building, environmental and energy ~ y" ~ h 1 ' } - E requirements. i~ j Allowance for Cost Increases ' s RT & Associates based costs on a December start of construction. € ti r a b ,Q Sources of Income A principle objective of CPAH in undertaking the Ti fany~lla project is to provide excellent quality, iong term housing at the lowest possible rents. Th e rents and resuft;n~ financial LT structure of the project were designed to maxim ¢e this objective within the lim;tations of , currently available funding. The proposed rent structure insures that 37% of the units will be available to families at or below 50% of area median income. The remaining &3% will be aflordaWe to families up to 60%of median income. Three bedocom rents targeted for the r highest priorrry needs reflect a $75 reduction (9%) in current rents after completion of ; substantial rehabilitation. All Tiffany Court rents will be reduced as were three bedroom rents 4 in the Villa La Paz. One and two bedroom rents will be raised slightly for consistency between ¢ a 4 ; " ~'.i - ~ the two projects and to reflect the upgraded condition and project rent targeting. 27- , ,K - I° - - 4 11 ~ '7 , ~ , . , ~ T _ r I ~ r I , . - . ~ T L . - i ~ . ~ ~ ~ - 1 ~ -it L ' - " _-Tl,~'~ , ' ' ' , ~ - - - - r- _ e { . - i .r _ . _ - - - - - - F. < r 4 _.1-.._._. _ S v. a~ - . _.L .L_s t.._s...~ . r.; . - r { 1~ 11 1 -4 ',-4~ 7",~,---. , , , ~ - M ,P z R.- `s a tt - - - r'ax ..y F}yf- C - - - _ L. Z*4 f - - - - _ - w z Z,U - - - - - - - r ~1 F -,x~`m.Er" ru..r..+r+ ....-..~_~n.c-.u~L.-=a_>.~...~...._.L. ,-,:-_-.,.+.w..r..w~r`✓ ....e..........._'.13t-:<i.a:.Y.-a......~_.._~.~....'......v - r 1 E , 4 v`t F { A ~1~ I f 0 Annual income in Year 5 is based on a modest 1.5% per year income. These projected ' * increases are estimated to be between one-half to two-thirds under expected market increases over the same period. This should assure that all units fall well within the 50% median income , ' affordability range at the end of the first five years. „ l Other revenue includes coin operated laundry estimated at slight increases over the last 24 r " i ®s a months based on higher anticipated occupancy. It is conservatively estimated at $1,500 per r - I x , month from 16 pairs of washers and dryers located at each of eight buildings. The 184 i f uncovered parking spaces are free. However, there are 78 carports for which monthly rent is a estimated at $12. Forfeited $75 security deposits are estimated for a one-quarter of the l anticipated annual turnover. Gross reiiwl irixme is adjk~sted fora 5%vacancy which is conservative given the units' low market rent. _ { 5 Operating and Maintenance Protections 41 - Operating costs were estimated b Guardian Management Corporation and reflect their e enivexperience in managing Section 42, Section 8 and other forms of assisted housing throughout the State of Oregon. insurance is based on the ro'eet's after rehabilitation value -ire ` as quoted by Guardian's underwriter. Utilities are individually metered to tenants with . J electricity use for cooking, heat and lighting and domestic hot water. Garbage is based on current estimates by the local disposal company. Water and sewer is based on utilization - , ~~'R. charges for projects with similar occupancy. Other expenses include the management office, ' ? , ° related supplies and equipment, allowances for at and acoounGng Legal expenses include - 3; those required for any termination actions and compliance with the Oregon Tenant Landlord , 4 1f s Law. Accounting includes proviswns for monthly, quarterly and annual reports required of , owners, lenders and limit partners. a i~ - t x Property management fee is estimated at 5% of adjusted gross rent and includes provision of a ~ a: , full-time, on-site manager, a maintenance technician and part-time assistant manager. A ~RRV ~ < ~ y y mod' E i, Repairs, general and landscape maintenance and unit tum-over costs also reflect conservative - a~ ? fi ` r a allowances based on projects of similar size, type and condition. yy l _ ~ 1 tM T n 1 Other expenses include allowances for advertising and marketing. Operating reserves are 'r t based on $150 per unit per month. Tenant services described elsewhere in this application will be provided through the cooperation of area social service providers. However, a resident ; t serv ices program has been legated to give management an opportunity to support special 4 _ tenant needs and programs as jointly determined by management and the to-be-formed ~ . , J, resident councils. Property tax abatement will be provided through agreement with local s government(s). cx i' t r, , g , r t Term and Cost of Financin : a l _ The terns and cost of financing are summarized in the next table. These reflect reasonable, yet conservative terms expected at the time of closing of acquisition, and financing of the e beginning of rehab work scheduled for December of this year. Six and one-half percent on 30 year tax exempt bonds were felt to be reasonable by both Washington County and the State of f Oregon. This is also the case with the bridge loan interest as estimated by Key Bank. Already a committed Washington County funds reflect terms in current funding agreements. , . ` 28- . •'I, t - - - - - - -'t'om, L, - f 1 f ( - - - ,F F - - - t F-- - - - . t. b - 2 f _ _ _ i ,j ,e - - E - ~ ~ - , - , ~ ~ ~ r - , - I I ~ - I ~ - ~ I ~ . I . ~ . I ~ r I r - . ~ ~ ~ ~ , ; "'r , - , , 1, ~ : ~ . ~ 1~ - - - - - - - a' r I _ J~ - - - ,4 r~_ ♦z.:z,~-~' w~-,...'~'., ja.c::...y_.__ t t=: _ _.n~ y ._.z.v _r... , ..~.i.._ s..r. _ _ y L ~.._•..s 't~. , - a. t - h - _ - c - p » x t -~q~ 7 ~ a.rr,..... _ __.~.w_..~...:rx..._N.~sa~,..~...-__....__-., ..._..u_.~.._.~..a......~_. r V 1 ~1 c z st .r ti - A V5 R G T Costs related to financing include a 2% fee for bond issuance, 1.5% of the outstanding balance of a letter of credit and a required s~-month pre-funded operating reserve and a contingency reserve of 3%of the tax-exempt bond amount. Legat, accountin g and cost j certification relate to both bridge ban and partnership documents. There will be no syndication fees for placement of the low income housing tax credit so that maximum benefit can accrue to t F the projecL t4. { r ~ 14. Funding Contacts a j ~s t x r i Source Anticipated Amt Contact Parson/ Anticipated Status fi . a 3 Phone Number Terms k y t 9 WashCo. Dept of $270,659 Susan Wilson, Loan Committed 4J96 Housing Services (HOME program) Executive Dir. 503/693-4755 WashCo. Dept. of $14,610 Todd Adkins, Loan Committed 7/95 x >z3~;:. Housing Services (HOME program) HOME Coord. 503/693-4777 ° er WashCo.Office of $24,981 ShanaAucsmith, Grant Commincd3/96 raa t, r ? Community (CDBG program) Sr. Comm. Dev. x i Develo ment Spec. 503/693-4437 WashCo. Dept of $7,875,603 Susan Wilson, Tax-exempt bond, Ongoing dis- 4 j sf s Housing Services Executive Dir. 6596 interest, cussioru re: terms, J r c 503/6934755 30 year term pricing &timing Oregon Housing & $100,000 VinceChiotti, Grant Committed 6196 Community (Tout Fund CDC Program Reps r r `F R # 7 Services Dept. program) 503/731-8354 { Oregon Housing & $7,875,603 Victor Smeltz, MF Tax-exempt bond, Ongoing dis- Communit Program Manager 6.5% interest. cussionsre: terms, it s Services Dent. 503/986-2053 30 year term pricing & timing Portland General to be determined Lynda Tatum, Grant - energy Ongoing discus- Electric r Electric Revenue & Feld education & sions around 'Re- Office Ops/Cust improvements; pre- build Oregon - ; gh C Svc. 503/612-3736 vaid meterin Communities" -r EF Key Bank of $726-500- Larry Iverson, Bank LIHfC Equity Initial project - s c s Oregon $1,453,000 Compliance Officer participation - 16- review with strong ; ' - 503-795-6057 18%IRR.24 expression of x month pay-i n interest t j ° NW Natural Gas $726,500 - Larry Iverson, Bank UHCC Equity Initial project = r $1,453,000 Compliance Officer Participation - 16- review with strong r `jL 503-795-6037 18% IRR, 24 expression of month pay-i n interest City Housing $60,000 Jeanne Staehli, 9% Bridge Loan, Committed 6196 Development, Inc. Board Member 50 day term k ` 1-503123-5-3515 Enterprise s Cp€ $100,000 Dave McConnell, 6% interest only, Preliminary project t Foundation Program Director 12-month term review, expression of interest r v -29- kp)) k ~J $ , c It t- r F d ?t a 3 +p r '3 t ' -s - ~ x S. r t r ,r r t { - - C _ y 1 _ - - -~l t - d_ - t-J L 1 ti x r r 3 i_ s n -..i r _,r_ V, 1aa n»p a 7,77 4 d : :k•i.; ..v s,~i` ,..µz , . w s-, ,Yd» k'ra ° x' '.,Y n:,.•. ,A t'Y' ~4 99 "P", ,:-,j'?„.b`:,J."y f!,- ,•,(.o 'S .,..i, ,rt+q. - 3.' _ ."•S" .i'~ 1^e rsa... 5 ~ x h J:" Ria, • F. Y'} , ?L~ .,i. u 'iy , a: ,;d; e•'= ~4~5-5 awl. r'.,K .aYi`YT -r '1 PC 'd vau $5. 't Cr• i1x `ik:" .t. irfr"~„,;H,, ~a^'3"F:~` ,"rf.~r 5- '3"• .h~~° -ny~.'r~,..,~ t W. 3ar 1 w-! 4„ ';rri=- •-5,:, 8, sP.,. g, 4.` f"t .~,^Y.,ia. w'!:~'^, z; a aF i'tP ;~r~., „a .x,. _ ,,q -a~: ' a.l °r•c= 7' - . - , r ~;i ^:4:'.-1..^~ Yr"''- •s;, e .,.V" r.1 r m x,:[rn:. , e.,:.`.'., .:•er`:k -"z ~ a°.•' n'~z:: fC: .r,.• ky,.¢t~',/ ~ ~r* r - ' *t r. ,•,,;.a: - rfk• ~ .,r . : } . ds. -n .`1'nn , ~ . , x r 11::r' r 8 P•` 2 . rt3°++ naf+'= 'a °r .ar~P~. ~e,:4^ .a,;,,a,w. ors ,~,a,~Y,, ."'scF.>..t~ .,t,r .r°i-,N•+ , s.+''r7 xa. ."1%~.. ~ '~.'a>~~ .a., Nt ,~Y y_a~ •x'?`c•-- ,Y-+:-, ~E. ,~n• ,t •u ..yk.;^" tp ..w•a •a Yr; '3 •'}r",q :,ai*, xi A. ~1'..a t',S` " R'h.x Y 1Y'4. X~ I t~ k ~ , r~ b vt)t.t . ~..4', a~+l ur• v Y^ ' `Y r .M-.n a ~ s,.3,. :r` ,+tcs rva M.#'., r1',t, 'TS aq 1'n" A' •L I l'r .3':. f+ -k..t•3` .'3,~.x r i,',~Pv~,4. . n'arx 1.. . ? t J.:c..° r, k'~r r' A y '?7 1::. ✓=',t"'` a f~a ~"4 :1 ~ } ,:F ; fr`- .-3~ ^zi,6!'f" fit )!xS >;'a. I'.-,'f. "TC "r,. al. p,.. 55~~v'S+ ~Y ; rTlarv p, 5 2:4'""-,t~ ev . 3 ' ~T ..8, , r+s..=r~. '`:.f•t s;'e x.:-a ar. r ' i r' 1° ' "yyrt s'#q> 3 L', V _ :r4'=p v .n „i'+'t awl; v-l. * «n, .~r w s ,a xp rd' ,-G, f<-~ R • .fit A. '":t ' P.• ( ~i F'YI' y'm'., r '~^y,' fly.. ,-.'i3 r^~:,.v ! } t-~P' rh . l •A' '•s's, v %;.:L:+ ".tr„,,,.., r"~3'„ ate' `f- t' 't=~ r' ¢ k~ MA , x,ySi L sr-. ❑ .c -G.e•~yx x~ T u„ 1.bvr ~l ` x, i `y , Q .l, 4.4u i:Mf'- 'K-.3 '1 i ~^F. 4$i : ..rw,,~~~.`:~»ry,,,.a.~.s.;., f.,...r,«,,'r. ~ y:•.,~ ~Y~-e•dt. ~.~,+F 1 51-1, Y! o- .r a _r.''.ix,~, „kr. .a,Yc W^-,:,,,-'z ,r w- - zIS"+ s ".*a.,.g$ a°'SRat•XsvA EtA t y'j r< k ,~e`e 4 tin" P r 1•rTi,..„rl s r_Pf PS t i 3 .jar ~~~~~'E'#£rd;;rri,~ ~,s , " i :,ivt „t"P h 46H ~Y; Yy'F,'PkY '{h:,' BOARD of DIRECTORS s Y) 01, ° w ( Jeannette Hamby r " State Senator r }t ,f$ tr r r ri 2 a Y 'I SL - N ' Wes Yuen t Beaverton city Councilman " Mary Tobias t 1 President & CEO, Tualatin Valley Economic f } Development Corporation Peter Herman h : I President, The Mortgage Network Barbara Smith , V.P., Manager, Community Investment, US Bank TUALATIN VALLEY Sharon Geraci HOUSING PARTNERS 1 ~ { Real Estate & Development Manager, Trl-Met a comnuFnlty development corporation j R % ' Greg Lutje Attornev at Law Anna Geller '•>y Principal, Geller & Associates Karl Mawson l , Community Development Director, City of Forest Grove Judy Bauman " + r Executive Director, LINK CDC c, F A l r ' Leon Laptook Topaz Faulkner L Executive Director Director of Housing, a Community Action Organization { Pi f Mike Schmidt 12350 SW Third Street " i Partner. Schmidt & Yee, Attorney at Law Beaverton, Oregon 97005 p Dan O'Leary sp F Tax Manager, Arthur Andersen, LLP 1 rte) 231-2987 ry, 239.5750 F~p Y? it L amy Benson y Architect & Project Manager, Cj I City of Portland. t i p k t- 5 t '*y i *'~f, ~ r er-SGtfr>?'t - +^y F'• M E YY~ O a ' { 1 d 'n - k ~\h f ~ , - to r a ~ -ra°, yl I bl,t~f ~f l§ih-s ~F' _ 2 ^..^^^.,t^,-,,.rv,s^-^,:yg4^rn,'^„Fns;>tgn:e,m.,,,s 17- . m 74F 7,7 'r,°, 4•wt~=`~4r ,.:rf ~~s'r rr'a„ . r v -x.:y, , tx 4 mg r °~a R u , „ aatir _ '.r. ~ `yir r.C:,.,,:+,. J'"'. .+x , =.a =ra , ~t^ -,~'R i i'n t:'~ `4"'-". =Yi$,y ,.i.. :.L° f .,Y,G' ..,°H ~1M1 V V 1 41 }*4k h , w. ) ~ r. r U .f r ;u,~. tnf+a.C t~ a c~~= .'r : "A:w, v>i Mgt a1a-~ * t t ` ~'4 u' cC' . V :'.1•. -t ':rte, q.' ..rG n., ,i, r.;;r; ..U dt,v".f;':.t: ,.4 - ra,~i V✓» a 77 . - i•~ :p~ ( K y.r . Wi: d+k - 'i'h ss: - .a c .!<a•r.: _ h ' iT`ETSr'~*~t~tr`h,,,. 'r#`rn, d. .>x', ,t 14 'h~ ii ,apes h. %•.i '`mf4` 'Y ;''•i.~• .V~ 5 M'--, .f • . r~^.~ ~:c,. , h r a 'mss ~ , s. „w~, „d-" ,,,arc atv •'a....: ":};w=i: .k.' rk:.thy., NJ~,. T,~I ~ r`nM.'., A•`4. `n, +2' , a;,w ..u : yy =e"ai 4' n~•y z a. .g '.'$~,r.. n6 `«r=. ,rN Y'=.~» ,1'S:n ~*yaE - ?`n,^: ~Yi r uPCga; a'i . l n~. 4: : "Tr' - ,..r' pY N #"W!j jz" 4,,r.• °*'Jr"'-,, I _'$a~ ^>*s:'• .$."x`u••a'x' F.a e> YY an ,:vk'k,` -,'',se,+, is' :t m ➢ i' - e . S t', ,t r;. Yr .?r+, t`,k' # : . Este .7 r-aA.-~~~'r,;'•z'~~~''` 5~ . ya'a „•a° ` s+` k ~:~5'~ ~ ra _ p~. a .it , •v w .t;~"`..,.. r'S,c r~,r',`~«: 'v+;,.a.~:'a<.v Q!~`' d ~8 e `t'"e a.- a .''n^T y Y'ei , ,.'-^p ~ ;nr4+R^ 'Yr .F . z, F.. , , 0 3 :,$x S~r,.ro ;rr . fi t ~~y~ ,lY~ 3t"• %W , ~ . - ` K, r. a ^ ~ ~ r53"k, ~.,"s, 3 w 'a as st~ I M , l,-:^rda5°, a. H. z,a: » t-` ~ , ,a`$} ~i a! 'S' J,`b~ ~.k 1 f'~nT,''~ 4 YfI s. " x s: • xo:• ; ur 4a}~&, _ a3 a •.k3h*r~,;k,IM. YP x-'~~•t" l s a I' k-3a, , AX•a. •;'+R 3t $°f,y, 3y,'+~^3- 5.•, t k>rz., 'e~ v.~'"`r'f~+3P ,t , z v N:a P''-;a~a Ord } "aa..•,-' 1}, at,., - *''~~„a.3•,.~,~,„ N,~° .st„ ,w,. "x3 r.';,.~. sy,4, '.t,'Cr• s ~.5.-.a, '~''°~"~~"•;'Y~~,~~" yr~ M~,+,,?~:6~~;°S~ w s rr y , zc, e :s x',«. > II, rs~u?"ugztt ,,,,•.,a ~,j+n ~ >=r ~:ri „ z.. . ;a,, -.a .,zi r~;:~.G" ~ „r•n.a.,. ,r°, . e, ~ '+r; I , L »:-,_-,n ..n, i-; ..t ,F. ex"'ixSJ rv „ ti~'+tie .-r4`,*,i!4+`u '.=:'F, t+', ~•'F" yg W43 :t,.. ;y`R 'vM ^ .a ,'4`w, .Xt= -S.F.`4,g. ,Yt,;`a~." :.;•4 .:'r,."~R' ,w r e!~ i ,..,~,e•ka s :~sxa +;rSff' 'k..~,. 'ie'M;' c a'i.. .e.. . ,3r ;•ys,., $;,,=a°., ;~,4', °s, rc ^'1 ~ I , "a=~x~,a"r~.~. . `.c~,~- ~ r~'' ~ , a~,..'~„~. - 14 t ~s-r x sm ^c^rl. 3 7~ 79 i ~1 3c+~'~l4 , i ~ •1 r; fl 'I ~ t'4 ~f ~a;, j r yy :~I t I ~ ~"i •..~i ~ if d ,'1'~ G:~..., tt a~ i ,L ~ R ~~}y;l~ I % - -..t-r.-..•_.._. ..y ._.i ,-,r- r:.t .c T[~p~es:«~t~jltl Pl .t4S1~ _ _ rti•'!!- ,~'.-•:'7: r. ~-w„-, RT1if'l.i...:Fa=j ~S ®rdablO ifi '®n d le - 'It's` t 0 Mettrv," dties'arid rounttes ~ ` ~ ='n [ 1 Cl r to ng aboui'this need now (I V VS Me continuesto dexelop co`me hotrieIe§s this year with a { 4i'polic es for citiesand coon _ : main factor being the i3sing cost of Ltiesto,follownowsothere-: bousing_x =;Iy _~:~cy;~m,;r'• - gion can use. up less land in It's easy to agree that a@o;dahle e thture,one refinement is wel::i.j' housing is a good thing`.. Beyond that 'come. ~+;c ~ . +Y. •w: 'a • • however,'the discussion gets more&- d That is putting ideas for promoting ficult. How much is needed, when will ordable housing in the plan. The' it be needed, where will it go. what : ; . ocument's title alone takes up plenty will it look like: who will it shelter,. ace" Urban Growth Management how much will it cost aadwho will `.ctioPlan It would tequiye cit pays Players including potential rest- Fe. nd counties to do such things dents, advocates for lgw•income e summ they --an H~S^rti'Wci1- pie, neighbors, lenders, homebuilder9 a .r t hare"-of new people and iobsiman-' , a nd,gov~rnments all view those gttea ! 1jl parking; traffic and congesfion; n, - tit ngpom different perspectives; and { - d protect "water quality and fish and the answers won'tcome qulckl or.f ildiifeFhabitat" ~ss re~~:x .n :u,. t T ,a ,•Notliffig sssetln'stoneya ~ t,~ anil c'on- Haut foz•new~the~Taa suggests~sims~ ersaflons codtinue betiveeu McWb f' counties t~ E anti, fhhe~usc-i`tiong; whicli:V°tieed~" $ - r l c - to make~zoningand other changes 'p Donating. ' c; w l aftertliep_3s-@ppro~ ilettifsfalt, developmentotaff lI §eea prdablleehpus M ® pidiug" w illg b rv~M21 of tlaCOIIv-ers- : ta7~ exemptions k'•~tion,'q~l~e&+NO E ion*i . o t , urinate in a'c#fisibn`bn ezpandig the g E& ban g`d;WkE oiinddrY The bonrid= ' Plaee~ent of affoida. ' y Gary's role in ifisirig land auil housing stroyed by other pro Mit'% r ts't4 hotldebated: Moving toward r ° ®Provldinggeneral fund orblock ' al of less Ian epiiist'tdked to house more grant money for development of af- plUto~ccoimtthe fordablehousing. to house peop The other sections'of the in alriii&s of the; region:: v, -I management plan areely nd it is a ` ments, but so far,thissection is fn. tl. hastieenthenbleader ly suggestions. Metro may t, other juilsdictions can't deny consider making it stroe problem'ni'duck the responsibii terests of early action on what is be t ity. coming an increasingly pressing issue ' Recently, for example, The Oregon- around a tight urban growth-bound- t aian's Cristine Gonzalez reported that ary. - - f Washington County, one of the richest In any case, cities and counties 'cer- jin the state, has an estimated 40,000 tainlY need to be thinking now about people living in poverty. She quoted a how they can help with affordable non rofit u 's statistic that at least _ housing as they work to build a tour- = j 10,0000 peoplein the county will be= , pact reon in he future. } } Unsigned editorials in this column present the mews ojThe Oregonian z Signed columns, letters and editorial cartoons elsewhere on this j;4 and In the opinion section express the views ojtheir authors and cartoonists ti ~ ~-IL-9c c ~ j % tF x i _ _ _ - - - I - T - . _ 3 _ _ _ _ - y i 3c-, "I R a "-'zT '.fir- 's,= - ~r - r - -ri 'T - x '-i s 4+' l ;f i, cav''~ a z r- v ! - - - r _U -5 - is awes W-11- z 7 'a c}7` 'i J - as m"C C ' t tat, { - - € t .4 7, j g St - } fit,}Y- 10€. yr s e - -f ' Mme- tx _ t - _ _ _ ` s s. i- t fr z ~'a - - 11 . 7 -i"r to n~ - z - 5~ ? i t?i f _ =Rte.-L'~.~s;.`s ?S;ata..' &//0,,- !Y}" r iE., 8~ TJ R _ y y'le 4 gyp. t E L - - ? ~ti-k 1 ~w - g~Ti,.`%Ft~y'~3..'¢ - .s - 'i~:-- _ JPV,t" . jj a y$€.`,'£ ?YtC _ JaF, :sf:'ta.~ '-Ai 01<iF: '`mil"t~ - -;,'A , Kr1 +`.5,~~ roaT?;, _n 11 9 x HAWTHORNEVILLA @S 'ta rr _ . ~ i„s" 'a, K it , .1 , -11 z - z 'J Hawthorne Villa Apartments is a 119 unit complex located on Pfaffle Road just x ~ 3 2 11 11 r F off 99W in Tigard. It was originally built in phases between 1969 and 1971. The tF £ ` z M x~ u - ~t a - property includes eight apartment buildings and one house that is used by the - V - , °a~ra t} on-site managers. The buildings are one and two stories in height, with pitched "~~a - roofs and covered stairwell entrances. Five of the buildings "wrap around" a central courtyards where the mature trees and plantings add to the r attractiveness and provide a measure of privacy. N. N. ' - t Q' ~ 111 t` . K 51 ~ ` * , , - ~u j,'~'~ 'I-, Bill' _ ~ 11$,P st , The complex has been purchased by a partnership formed by Tualatin Vall ey zt€ - } r . Housing Partners (TVHP) and The Arcand Company. Funding for the purchase was provided by a combination of Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits, ~_~g , u 11,2 1-r,,A41 and State Bonds through the Health, Housing Education and Cultural Facilities , '04 11 Authority with credit enhancement by the Federal National Mortgage ~'~f t~ ~ { -111i.11 - 21; Association (FNMA). This funding requires that the units be rented to ,,;,a ~ I ` b r households earning 60% or less of median income. Many of the current , f- t ° residents will qualify to remain and TVHP will try to assist those who must - ! leave to find new housing. ~ > , I 11 11 ,2 I 11 +,~,'fr f 7 'r Both TVHP and The Arcand Company have deferred their income from the x -sir k project to invest in renovation Every unit in the complex will be renovated by Lxs -Y r a a x , , 1 December, 1996. As part of these improvements, appliances and floor R . 4 t c L ai f coverings will be replaced, the exterior painted, and pedestrian pathways " 11 { created. At the close of the tax credit compliance period, in fifteen years, TVHP `y - , ? will become the sole owner and continue to maintain the project for the ' P - { "working poor" that include, grocery clerks, bank tellers, assembly workers I ' . 3 and others. _ . ~ ~ # N ~ i s saJ ; _ x i- jY s r t r,tt, - - s - r - - s. - r -nw a - r T -C{ '-2 y U 1 f g i }i f a - - rasa t 3 $S n a 54 N~, x f v~,s 044 5 t' - 2 ,w }e i "r ~i S~ 61 ~v k 's S i t a H { a _ R a a 2 + f : . - ~ ~ , : ~ . , ~ ~ _~NF - -0, - , ~ T, , ~ - . 11 I , ~ ~ I - ry- - - { { 3...: Community Partners for Affordable Housing, Inc. Discussion Paper PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UJ ( D. Who Authorizes Property Tax Abatement for Affordable Housing Projects? Provisions in Oregon's Revised Statutes allow local jurisdictions to provide tax abatement ® - to nonprofits who own, operate or manage housing which is targeted to individuals earning 50% or less of the area median income. This may be done on a case-by-case basis or through adoption of a broader policy. In Washington County, the City of North Plains recently abated taxes for a particular elderly housing project. In Oregon, two jurisdictions with very active abatement programs are Portland and Eugene. Hood River, Cottage Grove and Grants Pass also have adopted such provisions. Cities who participate state that this type of program gives them the "most bang for the buck" they can have in affordable housing. The impact on rents based on the per unit t u abatement is dollar for dollar. For instance, abating taxes on Villa La Paz (currently $37,400) would result in rents which are, on average, $34 dollars lower than they r - otherwise could be for every calendar year in which abatement is provided. For lower- income families, this monthly resource difference is dramatic. h=° , How Long are Taxes Abated For? t In the case of Eugene, nonprofits enjoy the exemption for a 10 year period. In Portland, groups must reapply annually, and will only receive the exemption to the extent that they µ are still serving the targeted population. The abatement is prorated for any units rented to families or individuals above the income guidelines. kv >a ~ ' as`'` How Does the Loss of Revenues Impact the City and its Other Taxpayers? Before Measure 5 was introduced, jurisdictions could simply shift the tax burden for the f abated property to other taxpayers who felt minimal impact. However, since Measure 5 5 limits the amount each taxing authority can charge, and requires taxpayer approval for l., any shiftstincreases, recovering the revenue is more problematic. In Portland, this has not presented a problem, as property values have been escalating enough that tax revenues have kept pace with the City's basic needs. r Does a Tax Abatement Policy Open the Door for Fraudulent Nonprofits? It a d With proper certification and monitoring, there should not be a problem with "undeserving nonprofits or projects" receiving abatement. The City may want to ha4 an annual application process with a fee to cover the costs of administering its review O.e. f $50). In this way, nonprofits can be asked to certify their own status as welt as that of 4 F each of the housing units under their control. Abatement can be prorated, if necessary, for non complying units or portions of the project (i.e. space used for commercial leases). In Portland, for instance, about 20 nonprofits participate in the tax abatement program. r What Benefits Accrue to the City, County and Schools Through Such a Program? First and foremost, local jurisdictions can have a critical impact on the provision of F affordable housing for residents within their service areas. Tax abatement is perhaps the single most effective form of financial commitment that can be made for such projects. The need for City, County and School resources should be reduced, as community-based U nonprofit ownership of affordable housing significantly impacts the degree to which said. units are maintained in decent, safe and sanitary condition, and the level of service which ° is provided to tenants to ensure that they can maintain their tenancy, jobs and school- related activities. i z~ 1 ~ - - fit - _ _ _ - - - _ - ?Ay -''r' - f a `fi ~a`~ a'~ e'7+1i 7 f z ~ _ a ` - _s _ 5 ,f_ s ~ - ~r r k. ~~t~ ks ~ ~'~*~`z.,~r~ Ns 1'~r 'S. - - ~ x ~e - _ r - *Y ,~bx•h ~ ~ + g- ~ ,s~b'~• ~`3r - z - - alF „i - - 'a~-~ v~+~ '~s",~-~~`*" Y ~ Leh - - s 4 tax rs r ~~'~-~N``~s ~,y~{x,~ ~ `~,~~Fs~.s,~,P: -s:.~~~±',~~c,.~.~s: .d..x,,..,..,.,r...,.K.xbcr~.`:~eitasza ~s::•.".~`.1'°.."a~ass2x:."'r>e.~:~'»,~`3'"a*F~-~~~z-'ia~~e• r s.`q*~.^"z~c..~~~~~y i W 011 x l A c r ae^''a MEMORANDUM ' CITY OF TIGARD r fug _ TO: Bill Monahan a tom, FROM: Nadine Smithy . k' fw t 'nax X'6,- DATE: June 12, SUBJECT: Metro Response to Tigard's Recommendations on :f Functional Plan yx,x :ar„;,:y Attached is Metro's response to the suggested revisions to the Growth Management x=-d=4 > Functional Plan. Tigard's recommendations are those with Jim Nicoli listed as the f'{ x~ L~ 3 Proponent. RR N cx s; vs3 f qVII e~ k p~ ~T gv r x. a`, f iP' + ~Yzp;sr 4~ L OR 4, NA~ s AMP 5F_N ~ i MK~ ~ if' rJ -T GH1d1o"~'~ ~C aE R`~xAt~ c'a ~ r. > 7 ~~ck ~ nd ~~z'y~ ss,: a+f~ C.. .,.S-''xG~rsw tr~x -r -'4 r - ti d Y J 5.4 f E - RNNx cur ( r n1`x' ~a 74 ,71 ~qd 4R~ xy9Y k2g t rz rc-~~~ K - r } E M O R A N D U M -<xry.;. s ii 'z < 5 asp j 17 S lamb y; M` METRO V F TO: Charlie Hales, Chair, MPAC and members ~ FROM: Andrew C. b Cotugno, Director Transportation OWO ,e. John Fregonese Director Growth Mana y Bement Services o ~k'~ ' fi nA'I'C. June Inc c ~z v' x '°`t cFa , Sin o 'SC Fhb 1 ) 42~' } s SUBJECT: Analysis of testimony on Urban Growth Management -Fnnctional Plan Attached please find a copy of our analysis and recommendations from Mike Burton, Executive - IN; Off y kr; , r rtf r e I would be please to discuss this with you at your June 12 meeting. s-,; x» s t t Thank you. :rcter"-t .+$5 - y k S i 542 s - k - ,fit,-•L~[ ; t ka §q F~ C 53 11 OMII"-~ r s - c: Jon Kvistad and Metro Council members3 Mike Burton, Executive Officer y goo? t' 3 W y } c 3 r r.r' ad's. ••^_,T - - w.wx,gn., u..,,...:.,. - t iF S.Hi x Fy A F r✓ ~ ~ 6 i{ j ,h % ml V-r'0-NrN ? w %S '-z m za^} e.c%cb+ c y' T f .t s E r- i r # 4 a rr MY f a - -r- - - ft ~f;' s ~k -f =4 ~c _ ry , `y s x Y 3 N kris a ~a ) ; "=E is''~Va _.....w.~. '-4'¢.,w_1_'? _ r....,:.mz.,... _ r.-......u..a~ms..e,....e.e..__.,...__.. • Y 7 i d-L.... Fr. A f t t _ 4 11 ~MM I - ,,5 1- -J Y, _ s'i'r e,S . - ' ' ~ ~ x roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan J . J N - v.:t^ 5 - il - d 'r Amendment 1 Testimony 34 ' l; , s, } C ` Number Page Number , i T - fi- - 4 -•!y h 1 - 1 Eta _ L ' Title - Structure of Requirements -lines 54 - 62 ' n.x x ,sir"-, 3 f Stephan I.ashbrook, Planning Director, City of Wilsonville 40b, I` r : Proponent(s) [ - z' z~ a r 0. ,-y I -t ek ` } 'T Explain or clarify that where permissive language is used; e.g., "should" "may", t ~ ` s r Proposed etc.) that is is recommended, not required 4 v r y Amendment I =~ra2 t S'- - L fi^1 - xK h'3 .A - - ,dig' ac~sr; F ! S {-N. t ri -s i I . 3 M~_"_'~7~__" ~5: l~ X ~ u Functional pleas may recommend or require changes to local jttrisdiworts - V . ~ , .11 Staff Analysis comprehensive plans and implementing ordinant:es. The Urban Growth ° " Management Functional Plan has both in it i 4 z s ` t , 17 r , _41 - n , , ' ~ tk- ~~~W 7 - I - - A 1~L r` a" - ` Executive Revise tines 54-55 to read: the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan is a regional i` Officer functional plan with "regttirements" binding on cities and counties of the region > t 1 Recommendation " , k t w sx - , r«»-.. p W . t - 5 h,o-W ..a t: Le•Y.t Q! . A~ . sm.,tt. ohx. , " "A 4 a W~ ,v , F , .t ea d- z MPAC E Recommendation - s _ x, S fff I ` r, :r tE 3 ? a i 4 I June 5, 1996 Page 1 ' ~ "~.'Z~_';'f~ "_,~~"-j'~r~' 0 - 'k ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ wn.o 7 - S L - r i 3~ S 4 3t - .•T' S -t r k - - - - - _ t - _ _ , . _ I . f [ i -F k " r g - - _ - 3 , j( Y - - _ p - -.'.1 . "k i I - , e fi v t I l ri t t W7 . : rs - - - _ "nlk ' I ~ , 11-0-1 11 _ w t r,r h'& +%'i-rCU ' f ~3 Jt_- r r ~,.,4 F'4`rrfi - y z,r - - .5 - i rod F 7 \ zsS s -x '0 Z S pW' s t y - - to - R 11 j D roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan ' 02 k ?~"s . , rt~~' " Amendment Testimony ff ~ r* z { ' ° i Number Page Number L * - fij x -~4t ,~l , - i r ] '~-q" ~ - N s , L i Title Title 1 - General comment E ' " , ~ > g' l 1 - 7 Mary Kyle McCurdy, 1,000 Friends of Oregon 5 lif ' q" yy Proponent(s) { : 1.1 Y Proposed Adopt specific minimum density standards for residential development and i A-111 a{ Amendment - , 3 minimum floor-arcs ratios for employment areas. i , - tf srr _ 5 - R_ tom' F 6 y - "-S s° F t r t W ~5 - ^s C¢ z Y N"cr - -"'k A'Y- "v y3 Staff AnalysisGrovAh orntion numbers for each jurisdiction is the region are included in Table€ sir 1. Jurisdictions will have to meet the numbers that the Metro Council adopts. tt*r~ A ~a - Existing practice at the state level (Metro Housing Rule, etc.) use averages rather.. ~ l A vi i %4 than minimums, so that jurisdictions can make decisions on individual properties _ _ 4. consistent with specific conditions, with the knowledge that the jurisdiction-wide ! numbers must still be achieved # #i~ ~ x ter` ` , r- d,,, , ~ , 7-`.'~`-- 1, x _r i 1nr - C EX@CUt1Ve. t;, p,,,F~wi t x , offerer Recommend no change to existing language. ~ ~ Recommendation ~ t ' , - 4 A j 1 -t$..e 5- 11 Y F i - ! S 'y ..~t, gt~ I. r' 'fir, r 1-, s - r z - a 5 MPAC y, ' w~t t ' gX t Recommendation .X -"I 5 q t ~z r t ~ { June 5. 1996 Page 2 ¢ . ' E+ N J `e 'r7~ a~5 wn.o~ d r d . ? - C -;l- psr - K, y } Ar - - -f -i4x 3 p - 4 " ~ "-k*b - la f .+v Y p~ }A -".r-Fr d 7fi t ? X - - - i+ 43 - Z Y- ( S } j I d- E~.,, f U , , IJ I J { ' . f - J NW fi 5 -J $ t ,t i _ P r n-~R r, g x - a ` art ,T_ 9 i' } I ~ ;fig s~"g-Y fin z s- s .,~d~ x - - - - } _.__._2 _ - c..,_ _ _ . I _ _ -i 7 _ y_, _,~-_.z ~ Mfr _ r ~ a g 'z f S- f tip. ly„ s _ a. .v k - - s - # i? - ,v i .fib 'k x' i i-- w - z -.r"°a~~'i• a - ~.t i a - t -g tr j y-.„ < '-"`t'~9 s S b `M' ow`.'`ret ...3a.s,.t'w.bs.,e..s.~,..... 'i2'aa - - 3.....~.. a t.,w3- xt • g; + - t o'gg ~rctiz 4:* e fix- 5a, - 7 tC ' ° , r roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan c ~ ss'-Z ~-i _ r ' ? . ,-M x 0 Amendment _ ~ 6r 3 Testimony 95 , Number Page Number r _ - x - ~ t 4 k Tine Title 1 -General comment, k ! ~ _ 2 Robert L. LeFeber, Mayboume Realty Proponent(s) ~~,r~~~~ r >t ,rl H, , r- c i Yx j c, t J--- P ct Delete title 1, let market forces detetmine - a , . t l t - - Proposed z £ -"",r~ r-~- r , Amendment * _t f ` , _ . 1 i CSC[-I -5,".- . .4 :L 1~~f { t E ` fi *c~ 4 4 s~'x..a, ,mac. y .1 I _ `3u 6,~ _ 7 4,T- zyr ~yw~ n t~ 3 f { If market forces were to be the determinant the urban growth boundary and all Staff Anal sis is y zoning would have to be withdrawn. In addition, streets, water, sewer, 7 k~ ; 11 11 ; 3 stotmwater, parks and other public services would have to be privitized ff W` rc f z ~I - h u y~ z~ t _ a i , , N .y, _ ~ ~ K F 'I, I ' i Executive Recommend no change to existing language. M- 5,~ k I'll ~ ' Officer t 4 - - Recommendation z r i~ - r~ 112, ~ ~'W tQ~ ,Y MPAC Recommendation ~ 4~ e y l x t~s° ' f Lj~ Y a - f 4 , t°--p~'t'~F 3 8 r^ , F~ -'j mfr Y t June 5, 1996 Page3 sy yrt K~rc;, I y-, Yn.e ~a 'r ck 7 E i s - - f s r k... r^ ~,.a a' - . _ r f O,.~~ 4E-", ~ . 1 I o"s-rt c - -I' f c x t ir- y- _ i i fie` aCF 3'' d L y r .1~1'11 , , 1~, , : L -,t~ I _Ir-,~ " , ! '11, , I ,I 'r - - J-~ r- _ i} f y C i Ff t 3t f C r..- . A`- Y t _ ✓ 1 ra `H 'rk ~ -7, 7 az'm F s r } 3 5i air M~ a (EE ti..'°'.~"'^<~--^^to.+^..~.~..,~..--°",,,~""_•.-t~r^a.~---~.--~-•-~.r-,r-ma'r'-."._'~~r _ ~-~-•-s"----~_~.g- n rr - _ " - r W - - - L 7 t . MS- 'tS..+-ern` p'z x-b q _ - - - r s 'i,xt* S i yZ _ . a+ fq '3. - 3' nib y - e `F~' >'MF sKs; - '.y _ c t f t r4 t w -a'+g.a 1 - r - ~y ' +s ~+'.$x ~x~ 1 -'t(.j t T - z t i^ '~-C 4 # tom` 11 g, P " s .r' ti - -c 2 ~ s 't:^+-mfr `*a - ~"'4x. - T _ 1 _ - - u -s as3 S-fro s ti e d a: t i -I;; .-r '-E 5 9 T;„ i k y _ k-fez' a#~`- _s a,,.t r s x z i s3 a `Mi r E- c tM y wxy a ~ x k z d -'fir } ' roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan ~ _ t w " Zia ~ ` e 1 Amendment r4 Testimony r~ ? " ° Page Number t Number U M c vv .r,r. x' 4 % M,.,s &x # , p , , 1-1 fi r Title Tide 1-General comment y r ' c a`S xh C'- ^ 3sy 1 et J r ~ a'~ Alan Sht grin. ; t a;z ~ r - ~ t Proponent(s) t.. < * ` t v'k: s x I 0- e s 2Y r- 7 ~i?{ $ Sr.~,'~y 1 Late: L '7T S q '-`x' , t 9 v r Expand the language of tide 1 to include industrial, commercial and retail land use aH - - - ~ _ . 5 ' . Proposed - X 0- Amendment t - r ms's - • ys~ r C~M z i `a*x ms's rt t # n , 'N ,--Yr - - r v l yl _ i j kk T.3 1 i '..Z I IN- Y 1 Staff Analysis Tile 1 includes employment -which encompasses industrial, office and re tail ® , .I zU + $ x - { ;,':.j COIDIDCIC181. t. t+ P'3' l`;' r ~ IS M- ;42.w r ;,.,t t i~ n N s ~ 3 i, 7 11 ak s Executive Recommendno change to existing language, unless Mort specific proposal made, t # , , r x r t 11 } i' fi Officer s , Recommendation ` - .z s , t ~ ,l ""~~5,a s i N 'C j% c W ,6 1 - n - + Recommendation o ' F u - k tt-' e 7 ~ { i FLr n r+ ~ - c ~ , ' i x June 5, 1996 ~ Page 4 t ~ i s'x .€.r - -v - atteo r - ! {Y ' yy-,'y"'t " c 11; - ~J r C 'sue _ 3k,, F_.. - 1 v~ ~k ~lt t~ r f a~ #yA~`L 3t x t - - - 's - -',mat,- - i w is r z , - fw'.~` # r s..~> s wx r r t 1 f f- { ; hZ _ °f4 G y C „'t L~ K _ '1 E ~ z t .r+r - - - . a a h-`" - ,f r _ t w - ' le _ -1 ) h - ' a''a -s fit-'-.t K 6 - ' t - °J-.,.:= ••-"a,... ' ,..v}F_. - !9~ y d ~ ~1 ~A. un > rt a xt s i m -,,,..rl t ~ t H - - - - - Y ~j f 1 1 ~T.-3Y~~- _...~_d_-. ~s~ _.~L _ ...n_ ...._.v. v`'~ la- - rr+rn>-'T^±~`•^`,.c_7~Yf...,_c.~s~.__ _ ._K-..~._L_ x._.-rl-x-_.`._' 2 -11 1~ - - - 7 _ I - - - - I - - y i§ : _ , IN " v L - x, 1 `.i . MR 4 j'~' ~ ,1 - . ~ - , z : , . - ~ I . ~ = ~ ~ - 1. t~ , _ 5~ , - .ji• - w _ 'si r r "rd ? y Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Er _i a y x 3 + 3 it - Amendment D Testimony 85 s _ ` z - Number Page Number 3 _ fit, - 1 s~ j' r _ - - 9' • - 4- ~,r~ES - a i3 - v f Title _ F Title 1 - lines 75 - 82 y, r 'r ' $V I" 1, - fr S E - } .tom ms - C} s Proponent(s) Jon Chandler, Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland ~~t x ~yE- i - } t k, ~ ,t-?~.§,; s it . . iiii G - } § ' Proposed Clarify whether the "Performance stsadard described in this section is in lieu of c ~,f t , ~ Amendment - local compliance with the balance of Title 1. i' r , y,e 5 3 - ~,y.•.#.31.~ Jaye LCS i ,41 a' ..,y'w.,, .';L'., _ t*'a Z"g,*X~.',`. ` atm., cam. 'wS~4 ' I I a~ . Staff Analysis li, .11 § q~' s t' The intent of this section is to provide an overall performance measure that would + 4 s ~ 1 - be imphneated by the other sections of the title. Clarification could be made. a- , I .1 z _ ~ i r 5 - z,-tr r Executive f s , F. Revise the language starting at line 75, as follows Meer "Local governments, a g`' Og Recommendation - s ate mast demonstrate that ~ r 5 J, x i € c _ } - hL - - 1;; V,! i L ( MPAC f p w w .3 a Recommendation + t 1' ` A r,j ` -1-1`1 u ~c M" 1 , ~ r ~ - t nary a" e .1 - v - - ~ i, t § F June 5, 1996 £ t E f2 - Pages r ; #j -,s- f + F - k 1 - £ f { j - -mow..,, ~,,~u _ " _ a x R yam' as, R ' i - t _ - - 'a-,-1 v -i.-z"-' of y { Q3 3 - - r tY, F f t r u ; ' - , Y _ _ r -f..,Y l- F+f 3 4 f - .P'~ - Y s1 - F'w3 7~ °~-9' 'g~"_F+P - S "^'4 row- - - _ ~Y V s - r- a - .j a. `S^-- . 1 Y y Q 7 F t: - 1 r 2v'~.f'vxi.z.4f't'°~y.-isx" r y - g a - € 3 ;iv' ~r{ 2 y x § t i ~ c r. - fir.. b } r asc-rtr .irY Vi- ~ - - Y T'" r Droposed Amcu1_ x c y, it 24, i996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan { I fl , -5 ~r „ w '#K`~ - - s, 3 'x e T ' Amendment Testimony 17 $ ;jF Number [!D Page Number it $~x - atti I'll, ~ 11 t z 4 ,tom - Title _ " t 7 k~ r ®a r C" Title 1 -Line 81 k } ~ N a a _ ~ 'a~.,, - b Yy rt'• , 3p ' cf]•!. .r$rs'i3, z'e _ _ _ _ Jim i li mayor, City of Tigard :;I ; yk `-r~ is-~?:' N Proponent(s) <t1 - reS ,5 sa t e 11. ese a _ x_~' & . a sm 'he'x, Yi ' ; , amend line to read: °...during the planning period by the private market or nssrsted s } 'P Proposed Amendment g prograass once all..." r . . , -t c--~_ ;a-.. ' - t tr a VVV~• e: 3s a` 7 ' FS F~?iR 1'S'k a Ley Y , [ k State planning law, adopted b the le ' lature t ` H~ - requires that all jurisdictions - ro r Staff Analysis Y throughout the state provide for needed housing, which is defined to include 3~ assisted housing- 9hS ~ "gt C .y's n ~ ,-,-3 ti t +.y5 f'k Y i I r { - „Y ~ S yr `Fr Executive Recommrnd no than to Z~ ' ' ~ ~ 3 s h Officer ge existinglanguage. E n t 1 R Recommendation - - ,3 l rk r a s Y MPAC v as x a° Recommendation j, n Mn - - - - f~+ , ; , + ' 11- G _ 77 5- t 1.TS- S ..K;i P,, f {Eg,. L. -,T r - L 4 -i 5 .3 t 'r, +3 }s• t`da . " a June 5, 1996 '°p st - S.F Pagc6 t _r A M y ...tv,1.. 2 Mciwo _ ' - ryam, ~.r"~. t "W i~ - 3 " _ z § e°aa k id tx k J: 3 to ° > - T"' _ r 1 r ~ X 7 ,3'.4" 1 q{ S Y4 r , . d fr~'~ h~'4. k 9 , 6 r - - - - - F a k~ axe 3.r 9 t C'w, aj k - - / ~ 11; - Z 1 'Tf ~ C ~.T, 2- 4' U {tE.. '2r .e'l F 1 2 4 XS ZN, i € ,537 ~„~'~^a~.u~"~,,'~;t•t..~r ~ ~ - -mss x - ~ ~'a~,~.~~~`~83f~t '~"3-` -_•=.....vavassyid::..m>:.a.X:.?..,L:.:-fo~~w...-.._..._< ' ~r3cs° ra ~~r`,~ ~ ~,~.k ~ ~ roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Amendment Testimony 1T x ,a rr Number Page Number s Title Titlellines-104 ZWA51k,:~- Jim Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard , ~ Proponent(s) ~i 5 - i rtti4x~ t ~ rr a City can't comment on this section until ? Proposed growth allocation is lmown and the I ,s _ q 4 Amendment growth allocation variables have been established Implementation of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan should be delayed until the final growth Y -r allocation decision is made and evaluated by local govemments and the a ' ; s~• Jz fit="- .=-'T•"s r. -W"P T-~c- availability of turban reserve lands to accommodate that growth are lmown. r{ F e r~ ~M•tR 5 # 3 k SSW-elf ~k This comment would not change functional plan text. Local govemments have Ek' r s= <r Staff Analysis been t requested to determine the growth capacity and responses have be= N YY- r rCCelVed•`"si-`^` .`CZ _rLV phv~ q, - a - •t~~ roux - 1' f'i`le) .N.l' T Officer Recommend that deliberations proceed x ` s a5< Recommendations` 4 ~t- f ~ t t t - Wiw MPAC a Recommendation s i r h v t Ma, 4 { z k June 5, 19% t Pagel i_l g R 3 - hvf wmu+s¢Wnae;m _ +.wiB + _ % 7J 7 4 z ~ 5~5. - b - - i 1 a'I y~r'x C ~ - , _ 4 _ - _ tom- r T ! 1Y 1 h `_.C y R r K = •1 $„t f 5 i' 5- 1 - 5 ~ { mI ~V` @+ x'.gn 'ate 3~c, s - _~x3i n - t , - ~t _ t - ,y _ a -Apo } _ ..t 'qty 'C ~'Z- , Sasl.. mz3 5'za'.w w..__.i...--.•. ++s,4oTs^.1EuJ . ,t r4 ~ . i 11 -1 1,-Y g ,k ~ . Y $ ' Proposed Amrndmrnts to the April 24, 1996 Urban Groulh Management Functional Plan -ma `4 a' y 3k k wit e- r r',it ^r}32r~? S - - k~- i al''Tk"•. s 6 L I Amendment Testimony ff& ~U + } ` 31I Number Page Number ] .,~~:,,,,~~!F~,`, - ~ f s , , j 5 4 E 't R 3 Title Title 1, lines 108 - 117 ` z Z" k gs - -R s a- - , , ` s* -rte, ~ , _ cs Jon Chandler, Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland v~ x ' ` / 7 Proponent(s) t 1- ~ 1",R, k No specific wording proposed. Proposal is thatjttrisdictions seeking to justify E 1-1 - x W Proposed higher density capacity by means ofminimum density regulations should be T t x r ~ t Amendment required to demonstrate that the minumnms are in fact likely to be achieved. r e j r 3'. 11 Z. M1- - - - _ 1V", ,ffWe, `Y..ti] ':v'iFirV;:ly, ° -,•rY ~'v~i-kk -rr k}fi i tip he ti; r W L -11 The following section (lines 118 through 135) require that jurisdictions consider : ~ - ~E Staff Analysis the effects of streets, landscaping and setback requirements, tree preservation N .1 , + k ordinances, etc. when determining their development capacity. r - y - , -rY y .1,~-~~.-~-,-~,-.~,--.,,~,~,,~,F-,~,."- 1-l"I ~ - _ _ -5,^ L _ 1, -l 1 F E fps b n t # Executive Recommend no change to existing language. 4f - 1-1.11 t ! Officer a a ra _ F x , ~ d 4 Recommendation 2 k t N s t 'v.3 rx mar- -P~~*ar`Fw , ' - I _ - L, I % I t ~ ~ -1 rrrr ~ [_~"_,-_11~",__ e y r' ! ( Eby" 7` 9 f' k, MPAC t r`z~~ t- Reeomrnendation k r ~ j - 11 x { ~ - - _i A w is I x 4 - ti - f e r a r r !We 5.1996 ~ x ~ Page 8 t Jp 9 y - k£ M- a i L•'~k,+a i v - - a t 'a z ' 777 -"~'-"et°,' c e~ a .e~""~-.- - r tress .~.,.«,.mae ~v S E ,,q f E. ` ` - - - ' _ '-r 4 t e,'~a T 5 - - :i _ err J'W f I L', ~ 1~1 , : , ~ - , - - _ , , " L - " r - T . , A , , , " x r r + a sf , " " i I I ¢ { i J _ f 1. - h- - t Cyy. i g r ~ - ~ - I 4 , , " - 04 , - , , ~ ...L 4, A y m 1' E I - ~L;_,_ ,I -.1 ~ 1 G s s s"w yam`` l7-77-,-'s- ,,",w 3 . _~fff : , - ~ 74~,,`111' ` Y , ) - I i 1 1 J - 2 _ - 4 - f H; - J a- _ S _ - - r i.r x., , _ - T tine m, "LL s -Y, } roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan a n ~E r ?33 1-rr Amendment D Testimony gg 1 Number Page Number > -:S,1'-,-i---,,?,~, ~ I,-*~,. t?~-, ~~i~-,- ~ , 11-~.'~K,,,~ r s " , - Title Titte 1, lines ! 18 - 135. t _ z c Jon Chandler, Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland Proponent(s) 7r ,r' I x.as,1 } u e:n a a - z,y y,s '4y _ 11, y No specific language. Requests that if a local jurisdiction relies on density c Amendment transfers or "add backs", that they demonstrate that these transfers can actually 4 z - haPPan Y 8 f( d S,E-i Y"T y - - .'A a I'`e j~ aa y $A f y - , f."4. 1 71, k l [ i 5 f t ` f Demonstration that density transfer works can be achieved in several ways. If the . Stan Analysis jurisidiction can show that has not only allowed transfers, but can show approved projects, one type of demonstration is shown, It is likely that off-site transfers are.. v- a J more difficult to achieve and past history of approvals would demonstrate that ` such approvals can occur in the future. On-site transfers are less difficult tok achieve than off-site transfers and more likely to occur, even in communities that have yet to provide for such transfers. Communities that have demonstrated that t~ , - - little underbuild has occurred in the past could be the test for allowing on-site transfers, , - ~ - s - v, v zs , Executive add after line117:'1e,.' pputryrhmughth%.~%-a~,de~tly, g~ yyaior}~ s ~ 'MW ` Officer Wnc ar~raas ua ~ edS> +s. i- o7Drsti; o. sZ%pE¢vatssl•dr iY i ~ ` ' - "i, i 1y Recommendation a s w~ , ~a1ii&y - . r _ t ?Rlat?!It 4i!Ft _ r j r5'.g & rk - Recommendation 3 T ' - ' - - L J I i1 k {4i P t ✓ ~..er - 2~ _ 1 r June s, 1996 Page y f M-.. $yx p Y Y r _ - P' 4 - - L 4 _Ka 4 ' f l _ f} - 1 1 , Y T" ~a „ - S k S , , , I , , t , , I - - ~ ~ . - - , ~ ~ , ~ , ~ ~ I - - , ~ . I I . r . ~ f ; _7 _ r . ~ , U , - I I ~ ~ r' ~ . . : ~ * . ~ I ~ ~ . I ~ ~ 4 ~ . ~ - , - - - ~ ~ ~ _ - _ _ - _ - FFF///' 7 t ,11 . ":_.u. v_~_ r _LL._ , tr .i,`. r' _ -_,u t :v cc~~Z ,_.li .4• f 3+. nkwa ax - - - mss- x _ ff~3r ffl ~ , ' F 11 r- - s•3 S # l { - * Y y - 3 S f;:OK.-'k-y ,~'-s.Y ~ f _ E 5 XX:.a'ui. W.. _ yra....e.+n+JJ.•acu3~ru*.`-~~ r :Fi suav ..wa ~._.a._~ - +FYSUUY.awa raMfuur...mr. _ 3~ } T - _ ~ _ ~f J _r r g,, - z 1 roposed Amendments to the April 24. 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan s a _ 1 a r r at <y x Amendment !0 Testimony s5 ,s e k - Number Page Number x a P , - i ; Title (Title 1 lines .164 - Jon Chandler, Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland e - x ~ ~7~ f ~s -`Proponent(s) 7` 3 4 ~ . , , - - - 7~'-,'._..~~ - 9- F-al,' No specific language proposed. Proposal is that in addition-to the requirements R Proposed s x " Amendment listed in the section local governmenu need to anal)-te their current housing mix t _ 'i r Aa~ $ I F and compare that to the housing mix that would be required by 2040 compliance. t t , " , To the extent there is a change, they should be required to justify that is light of ,I, r k , goal 10 and the needed housing sections of HB 2709. " a N,,,& _ sy - ts -+1..'.t'& _ LT .yfF`"ue.v' ~n W V,m" -TA 11 l If local jurisdictions meet the capacity numbers.as shown on?able 1, Metro will, ? ` l t Staff Analysisz s through its Housing Needs Analysis, demonstrate compliance with BB 2709. s ` = i fix 77 , - Ir.'3 , ' yy f,~ J .,sy ~ s5y i 5 F ,11 F i t ~ ~ ~ 3 .1. - fir. 5 .+~.g ~ f N I -11 'A , S~ C Exeeutrve j Recommend no change to existin lan a e. If k` a Officer g gu gr ;mil F Recommendation F w f - ' ' - , , x l 1 F -r }~T, x «V z ' MPAC z -tee' ` im! E j J 'k ? Recommendation h' - r n s _ i #X$ J I n ( c 3 ra3 - g t r - s r ' f1= ' ti ' -s {[r a ' 'E r , h g . } - + >y r a - tune S. 1996 f ~ -s^' +K "`"3 Page ] 0 K=: r E l` -y - { is - s kjt" r. k k r s sCe , {--i"` 5,,' sw - ~ r J. r E , { Y lit' t•-" r P - ~ t L..S' ! - - _y 4 _ .';~L , . , , - , " _ i~ , , ~ , ~ 21 ~ { ~s y Ml r _ P L S L _ S -y 3 ) 1 5 k I ` k K 1 .3.13 71r , 4 lj,ri- W- r 4 t _ F- -~T t M. t Y r - - " 7•` s~ , 4 _ k f _ _ u _ t . _ , _ . ti, W_.. t _ - 3_ _ ' ,-1,-k,,4& Yx-Nc =a ; 3+ t I - S - , ~~'X~~,~Zf!4~~,17~"lk7~,c~l~~r,--,,,,~,,~--- - . , , ,:,;L~ , - ~ : 1, I I ~ I a', z - ~ - ~ ~-;:-B 11 xx- $ F3 - i - Y --Z 11 3, ~ Ev - , 4~ - - - - -~--,~C, , 7~:, , -~'7.-, - - I - I its 7, f2 _ t t,§ T!p."'",- 'v. , - ._,.w.xvs3 4cKCa~.w..+a~r:=ssnaa.eeGSwt''~ b 3 , r rt-W-.y,y P x ~ ,-st{ gm'.-`- . r 1 _ T ~+h4d Pe^xAmcnu to the Anri124; 1945 UrLa~ Qv lt'! r agrnrni F~ etio o;~,I i i.; y N Amendment t1,11,11- k 11 Testimony 17 ~~4 ti h ,t - Number Page Number ~ , K , . x t-s h - tr T Title Title 1 - line 145 c} , e - .Y 1 ° k aE - Jim Niwli, Mayor, City of Tigard f r 3+ Proponent(s) yy f k i'ti I4 r x : ' vx - ~ ar - c Proposed delete the phrase: ~ f Amendment tig: \ c Y -?r r- a z'z - y+"c a, y S c~'=t~ - s , r. =r x - -r , li rays wry r eur-tr'r• r , { This is language that closely follows state law (HB 2709), adopted by the state : t` -t 3~ x - M L v Staff Analysis legislature at the last session. Even if Metro would not re - , F 'z~-l { quirt this test, Yy 1 compliance with state law would. s 4 - -Y E rf t'^h i„ . ryry,s~ r ~ F- F w 3 } f-- - Executive - , Recommctd no change to existing tcxt a Officer f, . < _j Recommendation It t ] i~ , " ti a y, i rs t J 11 ~ .}s t MPAC : m- -.yet st : Recommendation , ; , E 11 4_ 1 s - d r F ~u g -r7 . i4 12,ts t r K~ S r lb- tk `'fi f4r# t'r tt`~ it "t,`, i^r` t, i a k4` s i ~ 1" f June 5. 1996 Page) I 64 t C f t i' L, xg t ! f w'+mWim "A, ~=F'. 3 as .-a:.'w~^'."`b - ^ .+..o r` , t N- t 7 rte. , 'z t } s, _ --Y;.t t - s1 - - ELI t 'tea x ¢ z - _ a r it'"~f " ° ,'I Vii - ! -r a~ y < r_ s tr t-,, t`Jh A. z -i u a _ " f 7' F 5 E k -,y ft-4 _ 1 fit` __-1.,-. _ _ l.-+rr .r`!lF'.~.'~;, _^'.f.~•^~L7C '.'.ter-a-~±~sf-ST- T° _~T~'+~"' r-'---_!. :.TrF. _ - i " R , QK 1- R G tY ! K k fit - _ _ 3 ,d~., i w.zfYr~v°.aiam W.._..........M.,,o..r...,..vw-:mi..Ma.awry.a,......,.`.._..._: .,.r «:.a..._..--._...'~..,~._ - _ V W 3 {t~z5 vrt cas 3*;'% ~'s --t -d f .1 j Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 19% Urban Growth Management Functional Plan ~ ; 1 U & Y ` .y 4 , 3t^ Amendment 12 Testimony 9, 17, at k Number Page Number i i , , F.! - ~ { v - ~i - r i Title Title I -Lines 156 - 158 4` x, - : - a x 1 - x Gordon Faber, Mayor, City of Hillshorn (nroposal a, below) .U.. ~ 3 J Proponent(s) I Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard & Mark D. Whitlow, Retail Task Force ,F~ i~ R " x i L(proposal b, below) t t MT r t 4 t E y, i - I - . a.) No specific language change. Proposes that outside Light Rail Station areas, 3 Proposed the marketplace rather than zoning should establish minimum residential zoning t cw 1 Amendment densities and minimum FARs. Such densities and FARs should not be artificially 4 ; F u established F k ire t i'! fz > b.) " Lor0 governments have adopted densities mitrim- permitted - _ zoning designations that r 1 ; 4,111 n provide GrJht jurisdiction's expected capacity for 0 J'`s housing units or employment and.. " x r a3 The Metro 2040 Grown Concept calls for a compact urban form and calculation ~z 4 Staff Analysis of the capacity of the urban growth boundary requires a clear understanding of the fi , it . ; ~ k ~ potential capacity of jobs and housing within the current UGB. Without specific numbers, it would be difficult to implement or monitor progress of the 2040 _ ~ 1 F t A r v Growth Concept or better manage the urban growth boundary. ~ r `t' g Ts~ t' . r I (.S x_.°, k t' N A a z e 9 5-r`' a fi`Yl r „ Executive , _ , ~ ~ ~ r~~ r Officer No change to existing language is recommended § 4 i Recommendation K a,.Y, 2 c ; .i M 4 e - i 1 t - z n 1- x'~ u y s -i , r , _ - rr cn MPAC - - { Recommendation , Ipp Z f I Q_ k ,1 4 y i , ` 1 June 5,19% Page 12 1 x _ -,x-J c t ; , t k- _j d L f 2 U ' S f t r _ 1".. r YJ 7, Z 3 _ _ - ? - F I 4 t _ Y J ~ F! t i r, {1 3 _ - r - _ Y- dl r -d' S'-rl _ --_n~ 4~ k s s ~,i ' 4? ~FFE, , E 0`S~ - - - - i A f RT( l- k, ~L'cP - ^w.-'rte^w~~ _ 3777 , rt s - 3- E fir - a - ra . d . _ ~«.r - Ux - ~Y ,-05"L . - f 'h L - - - - 3 C ~ a`tq { } _ - - w,r.w.4. G.. sf .Y ..5.s.4«.,.-w.m,..:.n:saa..w+ts~.,..'.::..:s... _,sid a.- v 7 .y,. - - IV. aL { L t t ' #F T] roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan , c`t'= s P $ - - 3 } a'L4. _ F „ _ , t' Amendment 13 Testimony M Page Number z Number fl~-t - 91 4 t~- . - 8 a'4 a x x U 'r - Title Title 1-line 159 4 V+ I t G, - -s r-~ 4 v - S-a-s - ~4 M°'- s y yK.vfy ~c~ Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard rz __--t(s vpv,.c.,a) I a.> Proposed } reviewed their public facility plans and have, or can provide t -7. x 11 Amendment w.>: Mx.. , q , t}' igud(ngspurpGS.3orCVicie planned public facilities to accommodate growth t - within the plan period; and..." _ `,1 ' < - a 9 a W 4 tx, # ✓ -x u a This is a budget and polity issue for which Metro elected officials would s Staff Analysis determine Z 4,, - t Qa t 'rte y Metro, along with the State and Federal governments, have provided planning MIF x_~I-Ifl funds from time to time. "a ` t p. } - x =x 1, ~r I , . Oificve Metro expenditures decisions arc the progative of the Metro Council and ac a determined on a year to year basis. While Metro may decide to offer assistance ~ 1 Recommendation from time-to-time, it is not appropriate to include the above proposal in the ' 4- P functional plan language. s ; - . x~ < ~u} j - , ' , r F - ; { S , MPAC Recommendation x n' f Ir r. " :2 r r t ~~n* _i Y - Y -~K - S ; '~-f - 0. - t ip , '.y.,- . June 5, 1996 Page 13n 1 ~ °'C t Mn.o - n TY 1 s E F 1 av"n" - - " K-F .,L, , . . , I . ~ , . F dF D- K S r - ! } _ y 1 1 - L Y N i 4 J , , - , , q . . . , , I - I - - , ~ ~ ~ - I S . Y 7 - , t = , - ' 3 ti _ ; 4 n', { I r~s- - -~a- r t--~ ,r~ A fir' E f r p ( LL Y ] J i { [4 'I - j fr - - - j - 2t -t..n t. ,.~.~-.-a,Y ..v F'~-air ^•.0.__• 1v _ _ ~t. _ ~,m~.~~Tef~!Ti v__.4. __v.. ~.1 .w z.- -:n ~L. ^ .t ter] .fy - -T, ,1 Y'- x~..w nits` - - k a - ' _ ` Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan c ` t as -'S - - 3 1 ¢ y 3 - ` f cc's ZA.1-- k-s r a t 4 Amendment 14 Testimony 2 a } t- 3 Number D Page Number Title Tills 1 -lines 162 - 164 a ~F 3 4 .t gi----.t'f k 5 _ Y "itS Y r Mcu~h'n Mayor; City of Gresham ~`~4 to L ' Proponent(s) - - j -~-,~!,r",,,~,~' --',,~,~,7,'.'.~~-':Z.-' " , ~ i I I -'-I,,-- V , z s No specific language proposed. Propose that where physical constraints such as ; rr Y1" Proposed steep slopes, areas within 100 year flood plain etc. are located that language ? p x r Amendment about local governments permit partioning or subdividing in urban areas where e~fD 5 existing lot sizes are two or more times the minimum lot size of local jurisdiction g ~ e` - -0 A be amended to recognize these constraints. t ' % } " F r - This provision applies to those jurisdictions without sufficient capacity -and °d StaftAnalysis Q 4' g'V applies to the istin minimum lot size of local zoning - not Metro 2040 zoning. G tx r k r 1 In examining iufdl statistic from the past few years, a substantial proportion of t" yr ~ ` development occurred through flag-lot approvals. J, x I,', _ .pc r - _ ' fir'' zx•' ~ „3• - - K r. - " hx~v M Sri V [ ,t, _ -11 1 e - ~ $ f - t Executive Recommend that jurisdictions may wish to examine their minimum lot size 111 1 , , Officer regulations in sensitive areas and no change to existing functional plan text Recommendation a z _ 57 , a C - , , - t i t - i, MPAC h m t Recommendation fi~ } & + _ v t f l - ,4 - w '1 J_ - i 1 ` { x sr r .a y? -1v Z k f 1 e n i' x..-_ :Lune 5,. 1996 Page 14 i' _ - i - gz Lr t€ 1 ip~ Mwa' yN' 1 5 ' gj -14, '1 - r - -1 --~7,-,-, _ _ _ _ _ _ `^'ms 'S - ?',±!e u •;f' s 'a` j -xt k" lrE{ l d ,rat -f - - 'Y' { y.' ± _ .+v{T y t~;Ktk" F i3 t Z ~ fj' 1 L. a _ _ J - IL -r _ ~ - L - - - ' L - I : - - -,"Iri J., , "Q 1~1 A t n M 4 c {i E - ty pA[ 1 5 - ; L I r r . , , _1 ~ . I I I I ~ . . I ~ . r ~ L , , ~ 1. , : , ~ ~ "M - , ~ , ,.r x m , - E., 'P a z 4 ~ r 4, -war ~uu - a r - - _ _ mvay ' s k ,t C - " 4 ^w b1..iF4 .....~wv "4t2'~~'t.,,' ..s...,i~ksuo :1kY..u.x..em, 1.{11a'S.aa,. .:,...c..xiimc4..d;w.cat...x..~,~ 4 ~ - r'??- f 11j, I tea" ~k'_ - x'~ 2 -vs x. y. Y ' .r 5 - , k ,g,,- Z ~ i ~ ~ j Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan vi~ 0 Amendment 15 Testimony 18 a Number Page Number k , a Y r { Title lc r4 Title 1 - new language to be added after line 164 t- - a ~ x l+ 3 Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard fI , Proponent(s) t - n ' 1 a ;lcu.: OgotbF.ijrtsan. L t - Proposed w . , ,.:fSattegement Ftmtetioaal P1.4, d, + & r Sur? t ~ cw sdicnwt yroCourica'Yiisavelt x a , Amendment $5 Gi£$ cap " . - ~ 4K, ; t?' p~,Z 2.$" rS4 .I,ff tz 4~"~ t 11 , c sty,,; , - i- Staff Analysis The adoption of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan would include a $ y ~ 3 sL ` a 4' Metro adoption of the required capacity of each jurisdiction - z v~sY3~Ld Determination of the amount of land needed for urban reserves can only be done r ti 3 after determining the capacity within the current urban growth boundary, A IM ~ I - r decision about the capacity of all of the jurisdictions within the current urban Ill I growth boundary could be done at the same time that a determination of the needed number of acres of urban reserves. 4l?~ ~ r t !Y 3 <-9 t`f'k , _ ~ Executive Recommend no change to the existing language, Officer - a< Recommendation t rW + { t t N% ti F - - t '4 t iy E"r 1. e MPAC t y - of _ _ 11 Recommendation s 1 ti 4M , {M f a ar - t. j'. June 5, 1996 , Page 15 4 r y - . - f -'l t t M 't<n 4 F ~+S t+ x I & _ b _ k b ~?t I _ _ ate' [ f~j M - t t J~ 4 sX P - W - ,E - - k Sr n s Y r s 7 r 3 - 7 _ , , I I - , ~ : , , - I . . , ~ . - I , I - -'-'L , - ~ L - , - , 9 ''c r t{ y P9- n - , . _ _ ~ , .'.~r.r,-,-,~".-~--.'~,,~'.---;,-.'~,~',~~-,,,,,~~~"r -1 I , 1 . I - I- ~ - `rr wr--~,.~~v.Y,.ti _ -~•v.4-r .~arn-~-4- ._.r..~ _~is '-„-a".'_'----^---. x p 3 - - - Y ..~`~t`Y4.xrY`E 9A Y -1 6 t` .r,= F - Mrs + -a' - - t r r - c, ~,a` m.,~.:_~...., -.as..,.:,v..a - _ -u::.s .w,..~.,.,. J _:a {a-~ - r 1, t-'V r'- ' {...""..ice~, t 4 ; x - 2 1 } 7 a Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Groµlh Management Functional Plan t ~ e ,54 -3 - tai t~_ ti r a srs - z + { l tr - Amendment [ 16 Testimony 18 ! w, , Number Page Number v " ''~t- : S- c i Title Title 1 -new language to be added dier line 164 ' {f , 1 - 77 r < E Jim Nicoli, Mayor, Cityof Tigard F ~ Proponent(s) = hn m . . '~~p I ~ip 1.1~',{ir~tSRFrttptadopttOnPf[rt7anCuowtl~e[gal' , ~~-t~% r,"~ Z: ~ - Amendment i~b Wv not PU.Sltal#bc.${YeD [e%artiitgxs hcuilt shall tfi[~ , 'c> `K k 2 ' It My . < Mr, 'o 21 4 a3ia11 S o e-, w s rat V i ~.F - 9 4 =Y'~i' ' 3 wh''•i''"y_1rr~G1n V Rh y R'- JJ Staff AnalYsis The Metro Council will hold a public hearing, which willliW. y consist of several y ~ ~ 4 a v different days and evening where the public will testify about the Urban Growth ~ Management Functional Plan, growth allocations and jurisdictional capacity r t - y ~ re uirtxt[ents. i ~ r'. ' 4 + i w 4 y r 11 jk~ Executive , _ Recommend no change to existing language s c t i officer -Y r~ Iii' r. I -1 e Recommendation ~t'~;. fns t t ' i ? v F v - . - 1. { Recommendation i z w 4 - J L b [ { G t 'rte M^ a June5,1996 Page 16~ g y MRIIO i - 'S - l -ttp J 1 3,1 ,v h i. L _ f Y L 3 e-s } y t- % - - Pot- Z Y 'T^+PS•mnmw!4 . {zbt ron - -a t { ~nq~s ~°Y-i5 ':.•"+aia'f~"^_SSJaw~ - .,i'.'+:R..""'I3Y'~^^d b-•< t~ t e ' ' ~ i.4E~ _ P - - _ g .L . A " _~.r ' - " , , _ " _ j " - ~ 1:' - I , , ~ ~ , : . - , ~ 11 , . ~ " : I '-I I - 1 ~ - ' , ~z ' . ~ j il , , - " , , " 4 } J _ _ 5 f - { P-, , E. 1 _ t r x r5 ,E~ f 's1 .r i ' e t z _ _ f .I t-'a x "I"; , : : : ~ : I ~ I - ~ : . . I - , I ~Z : t 3 - - - - - - - u k ✓T 1 t, Y C t y 1 Y _ _ _ 1 CCC E - ~h - .~_-._,•.-..~~a,~•~ F'---~-..~~..r a,,.T,...--,.--"? „z - _,T^_-__-_~._ 4 il - . S Mf -v` 4t - - - - - I- W yl~ =xdx' 2RK' 412i........ l 't _ 4q k j. ,s. 5t k.ry sX rT "P s 1 ~ `ai..u......z~,....ar.u. cti vz ........,,~w.uj..v.,z..«_..,'~ .~,-.mss ._.~.a~..~. - - t~ ~ _ j . ~d yzz s , r,~', Yr _ v: ~ NR ',11 ~ IN "I `s FS 4 4 kV ~i G- % s; ~roposed Amendments to the April 24. 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plsn a" ' 1 ° ` WE: :g r i Amendment 17 Testimony 85 E{ a {'_t r x Number Page Number E t fi t - s t d k k ,y'~. r "4 t t _ K N; t ' y.- a Title Tide 1- lines 165 - 195 "k, I 3 N Jon Chandler, Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland t Proponent(s) ra t`1 , , F y No specific language comments. Unclear as to wlry-diffet'entiabon between " 5, ~ ti Proposed jurisdictions with capacity and those without. Suggests that jursidictions that do „+S v P-11 3 Amendment not have capacity currently outght to be required to consider the tools and d~ ~1 mechanisms set forth at Lines 184-193. He also suggest that Metro ought to , ` - require those jurisdictions without capacity be held to the same "what did you x F~ 7 r k really do" standard as is proposed for those that think they have already have 2040 _ „ 1 , zoning on the books. air , k Q 9 ' `err r 7 O Staff Analysis Lines 184 through 193 contain six tools which could be used by a~ jurisidition to ~ a implement the 2040 Growth Concept and need not be limited to communities '0 which actual built densities for 1990--1995 are less than 80 of permitted densities.. Uz i ~ - 1 v F L rh..~f'~ , 41 4 ° le7 - Executive Agra with concern. Add-after line 164 _ { m.,..n~.-,,.co.. y $ r - OiTc@P "(`„°t -.;....1'..~SY~~,. ~^r. "n?^~ r ~ 1 - , It - r- L ° # si - - MPAC a ~ t Recommendation i , 3 F 4 7 ` .y i id E f 1- - t~''- y4Pl - `3 1t F , Apr " 11 ~ R "4- 't a t - r' t ~ June S, 1996 Page 17 r r 4' y rn.o s SY v1 If 1 a3- -s C + t 1 I'll r 3 ~ ; 'p - -ors ~',•.-•y , - r- - - - e - s s % s: { 3 - - 4 - f'' 1 ? - - F rt f[ [ Y _ - L % II~YY 1 ~.ty r- _ f Y- f , y r y Y 'e~ " _ N - 6 d ~ iE _ -f' 4 ' - v x i f r C Y y t S - _ i - - - - Y ..r 4 L L v{, Y - iJ' Ix _ _ ' y~ L{ $ S f_ n 4 # _ l' - i - - _ _•z L - 7 - . - F -.t ..ci.~. J - i try` - z °v - •h -7 't ~'$s'~`t Ste'-,y r4 n ; . TI. t-% ~roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan a il.x.,r, ,x"i. 7 a ' $ Amendment 18 Testimony Is - € a z rs Number Page Number' - yak} i Title Title 1 -line 1?4 + a rf # aF Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard r , Proponent(s)i +~a i r revise the line to read ...measured in household oremgloyneeat density per net tsa f hi Proposed developed acre.,, Amendment M _ . s "•"5 °E't'~ 9a ;.yesfx y - f x_ Yen x Measuring employment density, or guaranteeing such is n difficult task Macy rya 4 Staff Analysis industries of similar characteristics may cluster in particular parts of the region and may be more or less land extensive in their needs. a OZ~ A ~ il'k' T' 4'~a ~ 4*• E- z y, a Executive Recommend approval of the above recommendation IPW t , rE i Officer t' 3 f {y Recommendations l } 2 ax a # MPAC v{ C { y s Recommendation ti r ~~+~'yry F 1 i June S. 1996 Page I8 s w~k S"i 'r;~} E -Y A . 9'xaZ Ti#'vw6•fi°.`:.#mCXr4.Y°°`'".+. "'a.y"".p 5¢s'. w _ S 5' ,R `xt "rg"'Te'?n F t o f 2 n...a 1 r 11 14, z - fir' - i i •r s - _ - - J}zF .fix t' y~~~s firti~~-- r 1. - _ r 3" 4 r k ~l,r fg r+l 3 Sr • ~ z i _ 4- ~ - 1 -,MP j.r ~ -1 ^ •e" - - - ` r F b _ G ".Ik~12EL # .e - ~i' e _ ,fit h - ¢ - _ - ~ igR 4i,-,~ - r)"',- N" - _ - I - I : 2 ~ , , , , ~ , . , I ~ 11 - I - I - , , ~ ' - - ~ - , ~ ~ - - ' - ~ i~ - „4 -2' i "i=, 4 r - , - s.......~.. ,max. .,.~-:~.3`~s.:.~s,~- L,,,- r'a.,:- ..w ....._.~s_b~._ 2 > "'s ue, 'S ~ i;~ - f - - - yam. xi n roposed Amendments to the April 24, Urban Growth Management Functional Plan ' - ~ 3 r I , g , t Amendment 19 Testimony ru-I t ' 11 - I ,a`rxl E Number Page Number _ { ' - _ -q t 0 - -T a kY - ( _ Title Title I, inc Lin - ~ - f c ' - r . a` x t awl, . a - i " ! - Stephan Lashbroolc, Plammng Director, City of Wilsonville z ' t ,7 c Proponent(s) t, r S ~ y f revise to state: "...80 % of the maximum densities pemtittedwlt3tout a 1. I ' Proposed » .ty = Amendment S- _ i t {i i f Current language does not have provision for considering density bonus, although ~ 'j, I ~ ~ a ~ s 11, + J Staff Analysis it does refer to maximum densities t * ""Y Pd. Bch Prestunable would include 4r i 1 r 4 density bontu provisions. However, suggest that the above amendment still is sr" ";1 unclear as to how to that density bonus, if allowed by local jurisdiction. Also, at. ° y} ~ , _ lines 110, 113,116 and 194 a percentage number is used which may also need ,A F 'T d ; m clan fcation. ~ f r ~r t - I r- ' I I- _",Ir . . Executive revise to state: "...80 % of the maximum densities permitted a fi t' S.-Y t3? z - a' Officer 6orius,;.i Also, similarly revise lines 110, 113, 116 and 194. 1 a [ Recommendation s t r ' fiI k' ~ Y , X iii f t - -x' 1? 3 MPAC a } Recommendation - ' 2 k K S - y {E - s r "11 'w. ' ~.8 L 4ih j' ) 4 ski _ 5a Lune 5, 1996 C - Page 19 Sl d' ii s F r Mn~1° k _ f° y - '_I' 1, ~ ~ I , - '-"'k,~z t't",'~'~'Iv~~'_~ 7, , ~ f~ F C k _ - -4 s - F ! {`P 3 P - a tt f- "L'I~',"'~:'~V' 14 I I f ~k ' L - rk5 F f -f - t e - f Ka g}'i - - - - I d~ 1 f F - f _ nr - - - - F-~'~ Y * [FG p,- - - - § l - - - 1' ~a , 0;r t~,R.... } t4 - 3 - 1 - f a r - frf~Y y ft r7 t``y'3 4: ` ~ a : rg't"'.`, r rp k .SS 1~ S- s 1i y s t P T s Pro posed Amendments to the April 24,1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan P , r + ` 5 ` Jf -11 _ lc ~ a m!x Amendment 20 Testimony is N "?t~ - y Number Page Number :7 a N , } a Title Title 1-lines 181-182 i -a+0 +k rh•w} d _ _ 9`r Y - Fem. - t ^^2` . -'~'c!-L 4, Y W,m, Jim lVtcAL, Mayor, City of Tigard _ a - r0.-, ~ ® x " Proponent(s) , Y4 ' tz 11, ' s tr w ~~l,',-,-*,-~~-,~~".~""~-_-~,.-~-,~~-,ii'~:~-~~~ i R,~-;-;?,,,~` " } revise the lines to state: "Metro recommends the use of-minimum density . ` } -i , * `s - , # 1 Proposed requirements as a preferred measure to achieve actual built dcnsitiesvrrnvice3 nse p>?~° Amendment' - 4 _ Al 'f_ r'ye' ` l 1 -Sat r The mixed use areas of the Metro 2040 Growth Concept an critical to the success - i ~ r r - Staff Analysis of the plan, but they are not the only areas in the region ~ ? ~ x, - ~t ~ .1' °yt ,-1--l", `.s, r e cam' $ - h 's r ~ r v - s cc- .L t~ , Ll 4 'mss soma- r t j'°-aa- tJ. J + fi Executive Agree with proposed language. t, - t + a Officer ~ iu z~A } r-' s i Recommendation - ,,u k i. L p .s s t"`.. } a R ` MPAC C ~ ` ir'-, - } ,t i Recommendation , a 4 r t , " f, 4~, .t,~ i j elm r2t ° - June 5. 1946 Page 20 c ~ 3 is s . S" s - -c L'n - i - - " t . - , 7 a r -s .r - >z _ 'e r.^s...-m- -,w...r«.-,~rS"u~tax= 1. s -Se t P- t - .iri d- 31 - f b S - F-"'- F'» ~ M, 1*1;j, y , L - ~ - r, , _ . - I , , , - - M t , ~ T 3I - : - , - , 7 I . - - . € { 4 ? s ! ,v y - 'S, - _ ~~,fi CIF £I}tom j 'o .7EF"4 Y-5'i- F Z A ~ F - S 4 J'g?3Y e1 7 2 A' a4 - C -7i' t sL? i(4 1 k `4 / - :I .y_ T - ~~__~-.a~...~!^^^•a."'_.~ - ~s--, - n.~.,..a...~r„».s..,.~: . ; r_--. _..t. - ,_r _ v _~s~ _ __.s I ' _ . . - r-u i , 07, `-'Z'D-1-:,",":" 'gA~',~f. g~'~'~";' ~ ~ - - , ~ , 11 Agg z~pig .1 ---i",'g , , - - ` ' ' ~--~~'-r.-~"- , - , , ~ " ~ , . , ~ , , " `~k y~~'°4'~' 'i'ce ss _ X J t'~~i°'' k q a_ s by ' 4 1 ,c'-" - tics-tr _ - k • y, 11 's x~ 'v ;,x-z .=:;.z• ;eSs :..c,..tz -...3.a....,... _.-...........a.. j ` -t ~ j' m£{s.tz?, s i 1", I ! 9~~:~"'~ t ' , rz Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban GroN1h Management Functional Plan a -tom 3 t.' Amendment 21 Testimony 19 n 11'z - z-_ ;fir - l : 3 Number Page Number _r y _r",, Title Title 2 -line 216 I ~ r < ' 11 --',-"~'N~-'li, Mayor, City of Tigard ` - r'ti - F- 7; 11 1_ Proponent(s)` ,s us 1, - { 4 revise line to read: "A. Local Governments may adopt - - e E f _ Proposed amendments, if necessary, to insure that Q- r„ ~n Amendment - ~ al, LI 11-11, r ' _ S~ re,ss h3} , +s 4 Proposed language would likely have the effect of changing tide from? , C Staff Analysis requirements to rtomtnmdations. . " - r p F ' ° ygvti 5-.~ moa I ' 17 ¢ 's 11 t 14, ~ ~ £ i _ r ' t Executive Region wide paridng policy is important to implementation of the 2040 Growth } ' Officer Con~Provisions have bees made in the tide to allow for local adjustments, : L e i f t a Recommendation but the Prt.indPle of rcducin8 Parlg for the reEton, its economy and its air quality ±f a'° - d dn rshould include requirements, not recommendations. ' J k 1 Recommendation y ~ --f _ i'trl -3 }j j c r s = ~s'~ t'z y y E Si J. -c5 Y f { t ra June 5, 1996 Page 21 ¢g $ - T r - t J ,S3 Mnto S 4 ~ i y, Y - q~' of Ia t F I P. O 3U, I I k ' u _ - _ - _ F I''{l 1' _ - _ -s S _ - , ; , ~ IL , , - ~ . , . . , ~ . 3 ' r- ~r r'. L -r ' _ n- - rr x c z see a + _ 2' > - r h£ _ k r _ r,sSI, F I C i S'1's. b, t 1 5 _ - - 7_ 1.X'~ ..-y « - __s - u~ 1,.. _ ~r - y zy - W~ 7: g - E- x - ` x_ 't'a`d s -t - - , - - - - t &izr L -M' h F+ ~i _In ~roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan t } z Amendment 22 Testimony r 81, v a - r Number Page Number 96 Title Title 2 -line 221 and elsewhere f Mar} D. Whitlow, Retail Task Force (proposal a) w , t Proponent(s) Gordon Faber, Mayor, City of Hillsboro (proposal b) Robert L. LeFeber, Maybourne Realty (proposal c) eg +rv a„ .~,s a aJ Re-examine the need for imposing maximum parking regulations of a region -tx - Proposed wide basis. - Amendment b.) Hillsboro does not support parking maximums and cannot support any maximum parking restrictions in areas where public transit is not assured within a s~ZY, , 1 rr reasonable time period. Public transit nt Pe available at the time when 2040 r t---~ land uses are developed; otherwise our transportation system vt 4" will not function t-x- j properly.r sF~ wore best way to reduce the use of land for parking is to let the free market P L f r f r n ~ r f < G ~+,•s ~l ~n B Stall Analysis The parking map has the greatest restrictions on lands which resent] have 20 minute or less pm peak hour service as well as Metro 2040 Growth Concept 5 s' mixed use areas (some which do not have 20 minute service). Local jurisdictions xnM~ ` f 4RI may propose less restrictive standards on a case-by-case basis as development 3e , e occurs in mixed use areas without 20 minute service. 45 t y g y'w Y r0 ME RK - Wil- Executive While convenient transit service is critical to this element we must be catefutfi Otrieer about mixed use areas and the design of uses even when transit is not yet fA~Q # Recommendation sttfficient Recommend that sufficient provisions for adjustment now exist in the teat 1, h P l MPAC > _ Recommendation 6 { s l 5 ~ F 1 €Y~~2 June 1996 r 'p Page 22 y N k ~ ~ .3T N k ?y S ~ 1 ~ - - F i ~ ♦ 1 i y s{ S ~ .fi- P» ~t H v 7-7 ~9 ~ 3 5 . ~i, a i -~~~x .ri L._ ~ i`_ ~c t 1 L. - Y - ~ ~ i 1 -i c.. .1 t s s_] i y iT✓ I 2 - - - j - - - 4. -F p 3 7 _ f))i }}`~z -.thy t - - k '3. . 2M~F~~U ~ Yb 1 Y - { N ~ ~ ~ $V k1~ r - 3 2 -Y 3 It fi 'r' - - R"'" S - f. - - i £ 1 - - {t~ dK ,z }~t~ - -k~ty }f'r', .1 3 T f E i + ~i d y i ~z r f 7f~ t-' b LU' ` ! da ~ail®"' w°aXdtsk :.~..:...,..a..-.,.n.. , - sw -2 ~f~ ? k,{L N 3 i >•a' a= , f e* '811`9-. ° , y2 .n..,~ , as- r; tFr a roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan ; e` f fE~LY Yny~"i T - r _ r*,y - P xM n, Amendment ' `r Testimony 19 Y z Number Page Number M _N z_ ci - s~ a xz~ k` 5 Title Title 2 -lines 228-229k-~- ~ .16I .1611 r r43a g R ° * ' ? - - Jim NicoG, Mayor, City of Tigard r `t+ps Proponent(s) pp~ t t _ - 4: , . s pa' 4 f mce, ~t x Revise the lint to read"Estaslraa as administrative or public r t Y ' P hearing process for co: nsidertng ratios for individual or joint developments t3ratme 4 Or , r Pro osed Amendment ...,.asOa~t ...wf,.., , WW ad ar. - # J Pegg--"k ..ter:-., ~a r a 3 r u R .x a The intent of the original language was to make sure that local jttrisitlictions did - a7~z sa 12 ~ Stott Analysis rovide for adjustments of Parldn8 n4turtanents on as may be needed r P A~ % } 7i - _D7 ~ r , ~~501' f x Executive _ ~-X Officer Recommend approval of proposed language.~J 1 -11 _z a ~ s? Recommendation : i a 11 I ;t MPAC T-4 s .t " , r t Recommendation {g,- ~ -r,,.~.," x r1 , {t( J X ~ t - S+,' 3 'Y ~J~ N 'l k J f -7 it P - FI - ;5" I 4 > >"1' 3 3rr ' ~YJ 4'p S Y _-q a 3 tSg.&aPb 3 ,FS - V ~ 1 S - pY. y June 5.1996 Pagc 23 4 ^r X zs M~}RO 1 4 3 ..F 5 f. ` t '31 A P h t h I -1 3 G I _'n --war 'TV/u:"` ..~P"f=n.L::~'-n.A+rXL;ii'^~-'.,;; .a---- `":?x:t~ K~ ! l 4 , _ _ , - - , -1 L I ~z - ~ r- - _ _ y x ~ s ' 5 {I 6 d - V i - tf F - - - n 3 j t t - - - - - - y 3#r'd 3 h - a is , J" 4. - - C L Cx .r-lq E-1 : , ~ ~ : ~ - , ~ - , , I - , , , . , r . ~ I - . ~ - ~ _ . q al _3.~.T_1 7.-.f..~..._.a.. ~ _ _f~v ..i..~.]L_t _f x~:._~....- i-. _ ~r_x..r:LLfL-.,. 11 - ~ n i , - I- ~ - - - , , t ,a'a- ~~vz3 er r - _ - - t _ - + "o -4 gy^' `s,E PC x , 3. s e _ 3=t' `J*+ Ap? t xP - J {t ' x ? ay q tF~r p ss ~r guru _+r , a roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan } t t ^a - r✓-saes i - '1 , a s - Amendment 2q Testimony 19 - n cr~ Number Page Number z` i; 'V ,n 9,, s - t f Title Title 2 -line 248 T s .A x~ k ' Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard Proponent(s) _ D. Metro shgtl + r Proposed r a~ moi:iioi on an annual basis. 4 - Amendment+ -x- I k Si - .1 9, i -ter'"--.~ r~~ -i 31 k . } T'f' } 2 4 } 11 5- I Metro, through a private contractor, currently gathers a substantial amount of c a w Staff Analysis ~.*hMv "h , 1 y { information from local jurisdictions, especially building permit data Gathering Q tt ~ , lh - y parking data could be added to this task I- >4 ~ " ' - - ; n T'a L ? } r r 'q ' f'Sh t"r -g t 11 F - Cam'? a-S"- S YU +.~3 _ f. " r , , x - 7. i t . .''''lA ~j 4.y;k _ Zy r - v 6 $ y~y. 3 V 4e Executive While Metro could gather this data, perhaps the most important consideration is p aPf } Officer the number and size of a parking requirement adjustments made by the jurisdictions. F Recommendation Recommend no change to existing text i j : } t 6- ti C ~s a 9 , rt, £4= < 4 - y MPAC a . - a -1 Recommendation -ft } - , r s 4X' - E ;A ,"a r - - i - 1 _ IT ,f i b -1 r a AMC 5,19% ~ f r } - .1 Page 24 FF,,, - e- t - n' z t FI 4 n1 f M... - i h_ , R 1, r :3 x - °'"E r _ F ; s's-,~m.~...••°•°-----.,.....~~~,e t-.r ~?"m~"".'^'. v;--- ,-fir 4E #4' t err K - - . 7` 5' 5- - ni 3- SA C { _ S, ` , ~4- yjt'r y ~ 7, ,'j, - ' --,:r r J, , ~ ,,,j~,,-,~, - r z x s 'fit, 3 ~ , , - -i .rte, t - _ - s z - < h } S a ' S Kk - - - ,5 4M ^.4 L f »-'-n . -,-;c >J .I, . _I _ 1 W.. - c........._.. , Y ~i.._ _ - I ti - _ x. _v .~.~t~v~.~_. .i..~ _c.. ~ . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . .t 1-"9 r x q' - dF _ E '~$'g i'7x`ta k' - t h L S A_ - - - - 1-1 h71_;;& 11 &~v5 $--r - y,'.uv ...t r., rwaarvww...~.-zr... aG.v+..n2.e.k __f«w'. v~us+.Y# . -I, '7 ".t. 'tF F .x..cs m . ate...- S - x, n t y- '1 -.I "t 6v- v{'4 Pr y {traces- t r ~]roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan_ x r Amendment 25 Testimony 4 _ Number Page Number 171 S' J, c. Title - Title 3 -general comment 'A - _ 5y_ £ - g t--. -.v 4 e Gussie McRobert, Mayor, City of Gresham (proposal a) r ~1 S i~ Proponent(s) Jon Chandler, Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland (proposal b) : -,rr r- -F - g 3~,4 a.) No specific language change. Recommends that it may be more prudent to i , _ - ` Proposed confine regional efforts to that which is provided in Statewide Planning Goal 5 ' ? 'f Amendment ~ and not duplicate efforts of local governments in the past to meet goal 5 t~FX : a & . requirements. , 1 ' ' - ` ' - b) in written testimony recommends entire title to be removed. In oral testimon y ; at =-1'; ~ 17 public hearing stated that the VWAGMTAC version is much improved. 1 r p': 11, I x a k 4~ -i; ~s r 3-_ >z, ~ hrr'~ F" i 0 a) The Region 2040 Concept recognizes the need to protect rivers, streams ands 'V tip Staff Analysis other environmental factors throughout the region, not just exclusively Goal 5 - , ' " ~I E resources. The Title 3 provisions, therefore, are more comprehensive than Goal 5 I ~ e , i ~'2' 1 - y and emphasize the need for connectivity to protect resources on a watershed basis n' fi e t ; _ 4 across jurisdictional boundaries. Title 3 will not duplicate existing Goal 5 wort: -j "'N r t that has been done by local governments. It rues local Goal 5 work as a starting 4 i r point, identifies data gaps and establish performance standards for protection of i ' ~ .1i , 14 regionally significant fish and wildlife habitat ~ s 1. ' I~i b)Protection of natural resources and open space is a cornerstone in the Region ~ 2040 Concept, RUGGOs and Gtt spaces Master Plan. 1 ' i . , ' c ~t 5ys. 9 ` Z t P ^a IC 'em 11 iu Fp Executive Further exploration may be necessary to ensure that no duplication of already 4 ' f y , ~ Officer completed Goal 5 efforts will occur. The recommendations of the + , Recommendation MTAC/WRPAC groups attempts to address this. With this issue satisfied r i , *t ' f believe no further change is necessary a "y - , MPAC Recommendation ' F f' i` , r f h i _ t June 5 , - . 3 L t c s 1996 Page 25 r _ Y NiI110 - s_ s , - f - - - _ } NE j- z b1t r z _ .Nr._,.....L T q, s - - i b -F Y 3` i'~ Tg 5 7 i p' - _ - r- t 7 { - h 11 y - - - i. W - - - E - - f.. ` - - - -a c C, I ~ 11 as _.,_x>. s.c _._L- -7~ _ ~,s. _ -."z .i.~_ ...1. - r1..._.~.4 ...t. ,r,... i"i c_.~ ,L. _ i.__.~ t 's . g _°'T 'filth- 1Yt - ~d T 1 S _ _ - ~ t ~z' T~ 51 M a" acesr- - - _ - N- , " t t - - - - - - a - -_"-s,-F- g 4e~~wr`. 1.A 4 {.j ant, F ,Y?4 {A5~ # r ` roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Groutih Management Functional Plan ` 5a g 11. - _ t ;,tax t; _ tZ rxs _ - Amendment' 7.6 Testimony = m Number Page Number 171 -wf y 4 4 s r ; r - ,4n4 - . Title Title 3 - general comment - , Gail Parker x+. - ?a } e~ Proponent(s) ¢7- , r t , c 44 4--1 ~J"3 t ffJ e t M1 µ ry,,.i r~ y fT 1 (_l F No specific language change. Recommends that protection-of wetlands and f*xt k 18 Proposed stream corridors be based on its existence, not whether it has previously been x' x I IM 4 Amendments identified and recommends that land proposed for development shall be Certified s by an independent biologist and/or wetlands specialist as having or not having= - - d3r , r wetlands/stream corridors on it px ` -M~ I, -y ry v. Stall Analysis Title 3 uses the US Geological Survey (USGS) perennial streams map as a basis , , , x # ` a for rives and strum proterxioa Staff recognizes that all perennial streams may 3 - 3-' f t : not be on the USGS map. Through the Title 3 map adoption process Metro will , r - ` ~ x c'= K ' request local jurisdictions, citizens and utilities to recommend corrections and s additions to the map. The map will be updated periodically based on new data. ? ' ~ ~ ~'~x 11 ' - -I , The Title 3 map will delineate natural resources for protection by local § Y s jurisdictions Local jurisdictions will present findings to the Metro Council tops f r show how they are meeting Title 3 performance standards. R ° k l aq~Qr° f ' F -11 Executive Recommend no change to existing text i ° ,X11- t' ' € Ofricer= s E Recommendation `i _ r t 41 _ a - - =s, Recommendation x T_xf,r - _3:j E n ~ - Y - S - S~~i. 4 _ i S Wk k` r -;h '1 / ' - f - 1 - - asfry C June 5, 1996 { }'t J Page 26 - "h - - x'-y R Z 3 ~:l P.. I-'~''f kk _ .w.a...~ - t ` _»WE sn RY'tPZ4w --4 l W , 17 > - - x - N _ yst ..%t C' FN d bS" r ' tT4f f X -x -Y k %1F NxI - F E! S B _ f r ~4v.,,, ,n L - ' ~ ~ ~ , . 4T,~ , 6 U2 _ ; , _ _ _ ~ ~l, 7 , ,.i ~ , , - -cJ 1~` - ..~~..~.r~~'r__- ---'r^•.-+..---T.~n-rc^_•s•iS~'~CT'.•~'^~~ ~1cr -ZY+'ar.-. ^-'~T~-~r- ~ _ 5 .u _...v ~~.::rt- _ v..a_.. ..._.s" u: w. Y~ t_, _.u~.~ .yuL` i. i _ 1., - c,..~" .~_._Y....-._,=. ;~,'i~;~~'-~V'~~ - , 7i-t - ~ I , VI .i I , - "I 3.;..;t$ ''a3 3,k'S r. 'x i ire' t- -r a -'.t ' .~<s s 5 ter- - - r _ - - t - - - - x~-. - -4x .f - " r t _ _ g`~~3ar~° ,.,}iry` 4 k C - _ _ _ - _ 3 3 sG f r6~ -nsw4 l i'T~ .f _ -L - i - r {5 t fin . e' 4 m t t azti ,bxq%-'B&j .&_g~ai az,m.. .`sysu.s . __....eY,,. -CX'R - - r 7 t ° 11 . 1 Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management F.unetional Plan a + Amendment 27 Testimony 37~ x 'x Number Page Number D, ~z rte, _ hC s~'2 fi * s - Title Title 3 rte} " - F- t''huh ' ''W'" N t 1. a Mike Houck Audubon Society of Portland i - i s"' ; ~ u' t < Proponent(s) Kirk- Schroeder, American Fisheries Society, Oregon Chapter ` °rt t a t ~ 't Oar i Adopt MTAC/WRPAC revised title 3 . _ - y a- x V, 'Ag-° ~ f n , Proposed ~ asp a _ Amendment r ! > v~ ~ i ` e-y # - ~ 'oaf M W-2IM '.~c ; - X i t- I ?i" ~ - s'"v ' I k Staff Analysis ° s`5 J x This text is an almost complete redraft of the title and addresses the concerns of :s { 1 s r a~'. x many different perspectives. ' - a d - - ' i~ t t a i s ! _ i~ i r- i - "L a Executive Retwmtnend adoption ofproposed text 1, I fi Ft ' , Officer v ` Recommendation :jam' ~ x"' 7,1 - 7" "gipp r r MPAC r next',-'' - Recommendation ~ r- - a K , t r- r s +..,x 4" Ci fy S gas, ! ! -.t a „ a i r,r r Y',,x + j: June S. 1996 Page 27 i'_ ~r c - ' ~4yp s ?''A --v Mn11o 1 f' ..f -r 3 'x'- h Y f- j r` ` fik rt r y d'x fi„r YS a 4 7 '^`^'.'^°•Ma ,z 5.,. 'E. Srt axvY,r -:t a'^--' 0 t Ity ~~7- y V' - j c - J F I Y 4 ^`.x tr' t t _ , x T Xy. 6"'l # <-Si f - .f t - Y - _rt a J~ t~[ " I i I I- ,It"" ~ ~ . " 1_1 ' I ~ ' , . , _ , ~j 5}F bevy. r z- _ m - P 1 - - ~ e a E a 4 . w1 t _ i4itt R~ ' b ~s z~~ Via` r' k i - ~t 7 z,C~i~ k~x Y^x'.~.~ ~ t ~.y ~x - r ""`._7-----...y - zs•-l, .z-x # _..t.~,..,•.._,.-3... w c` r , _ _ k y,. a r - ti ,7 k5 - I -,gS`« - - - - - - - P 1 y 3l' -d - - ~1 Fa G sY ~ ,_11 , ~ - - -R-,B,,~~-: ',@ 1,0~ -S'P,4X_,:- k`,k-,;,VbA--",' , " ~ , ~,'~~.,.~,-~,~,,-,'v,'.~,,,-,_.q,""~4~ ~ - - _ s - t J akT~ +N T'S. - °3' ' -krr' ' otc~....,A...e.._;'..._ °~°~....<...n.•,.re ..._.,..an. *•ana,..>.. ' ~ . rr5' 'h~4 #`t~. X Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan - 4 Vii- x b 4 3 2x F ? T5 S' # - S~te~ -y `TY y"~5 • 'i}i } .rte i~3 } a1 '~*F _ ~.:;;V_ ,ig,,si~ - cxt," ~~t~ ~ Amendment 28 Testimony r9 { 11 a Number Page Number r oI -10 F a . z ~r 11 r r ~ t~ 1 Title Title 3 - line 270 ~ , , a u R € k i Jim Nicoll, Mayor, City of Tigard € f t f~a I ` ; - - „ Proponent(s) 'y _ y x ''c delete line: " t r t nit z3 Proposeda-- 1 s . t cz s Amendment - 4 t s _w.s.s - .t Staff Analysis Section 3 describes the implementation process for local governments. The model f ~r x, f ordinance will be developed within the next several months and local jurisdictions ~ f ; _ ~ s e i on WRPAC and MTAC will develop the ordinance language. Neither Title 3 nor.. x } 5 R ' the attached map take effect until the model ordinance is approved by the Metro ' - a Council. Local jurisdictions will have full opportunity to comment on the content % ~ . of the Title 3 ordinance. - - t r F - - t ~`3 it's, ~.a y~'r _a,,,~ .r If, s. V~w li~~~ F s - 5n 4x 5F a` r' , Executive Recommend no change to existing text r t rt { 5 t 1 Officer Fp } D~ t ~YV xr y y i f Recommendation i 't,,r , h r y r .,..,r s f C ,5 tit ti1 _L - , ~"yy :r '4 * rf - • MPAC P st " r ~ -r f , ' ' Recommendation , ~ , ztt " L,F - t t f M- - - - 4t s r4'` -4 Y ¢ r i y June S. 1996 Page 28 ~ E 1 - f ~7,,, hf,, r, , w t , t 'f - f, -s C i 4~1 r N ,4 of r r9. a ~ 7 y y , j~! ' .g -~3n,y~',~, 1'~,,","- _ - - . " - : ' - , ~ ~ ",_4", . _ , ~ _ _ ~ - - " , r ` , r . - - ',"~~i~ ;4,';'!~', .*!',',~L, - 1, , ~ , I . , : y S any t ! - rVt 1 - _ _ 'Y , 2 ~l V U- _ t X w _ - s y' _ 1 I; yy i I Y t - ' " t'] " [ rc S - - - - . , d z - 3 _ • ,E r s 11 ~ - r , , - ~ - , , , , - I ~ , 1~ - , 1, ~ ~ ~ ~ - i - , -1,- , , _ q~~ YI IPN,~ y- / F { 5 _ 1-1 "'fa- Yx.:'ktu g, 7 s °s'4'~i' ^r ~r s - T -t z t lul "'IV. "N - x f yet , ~t Ya ' _ - ',~iAi - _ - a yta , ` r ~ 4 ti z° ~ roposel Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan t' . _ r _ Amendment 29 Testimony 31 , Y - - " - f- 3 - Z'st Number Page Number - x t- - £ S k - ` z c . Title Title 3, lines 290-291(line 57 of WRPAC draft) t -c 4.a 7 gs.G 'i Kk5 - ,S r - ' Russell D. Peterson Oregon State Office, Fish and Wildlife Service, US Dept of I z>s~ 'r' Proponent(s) the Interior FY r $ ti f- { a r r Y u 3 define the design flood height, at a minimmq as-the 100 year recurrence interval. ` . , t t - -11 Proposed - x Amendment sew- ~ t z T 3 :f b --t FY T~ a i'fs"t Zi' y s x ,e - h 4'yia44 4 'w k `Y P^5 9 ~t >r}t~+ ' ctt 0 Staff Analysis This level of detail regarding flood height will be specified in the Title 3 model I - t ~ ordinance. USFWS is a member of WRPAC which will develop this language and w s this recommendation should be made at that time. - S ;may ?5~t•-.7 F _ _I- I MA , a at -"^fi-~ 'fit x _ >»e, I Executive Agri that flood height definition, especially after February occtaences is - X !1`F Officer important , but it needs more research more appropriate to the model ordinance- . $ ° 1 F Recommendation Recommend no change to existing text at this time, , ` f { .r t , ~ r ~,r ~ t ~ ; t ~e h sr tt k kt_~ + f z MPAC x 1 ~ ' ~ r Recommendation j f~ w ~ ~s { " 4 Y ; -C 4 1 - t e s , u-x^ i - j a Y ~a s° , -t ~-'A June 5, 1996 - Page 29 - l" i- ° $ r 4> i t 'sr a k - r i of ..?~i• r ,xy f . - yr r t t it c' - # F { i - , y 3 ";,~~,-`,,,~~,t~ -,-,,~~,~,~t" ,~,4;'v,:~~ I 12 - ~ 0 - t - -r - - 4~ T Z F T d 'C-s [ ~ '.,f_,-,, , -r , ~ , ,~2~ , , _1 ~ 7 ~ I - i ~ ~~_"t , -:.V; ,_r, , , ,~r~, L ~EsL v- t 1 Y, - - - - - - a - • d,,i~- ,-a z 111 - r a K r. u 4 > a i_}..-...- .a..t - *c'fr "fiN S 5'"t i5~. a xto .f?. -z z - - ~ei 't-=•Skk~- `;`"r 3 's _ i -„t =a Sec tr, ` , hx 4 u c I as x s a A - ' _ ask i A 4 - '~"ss. ; `r 3# `^c i--f4tf x i D ropoud Amendments to the April 24. 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan A ` _ ` Y - 7 ` ~ -x' 3w - r r f - t 'iii x . t ~r i 1 - E' Amendment 30 Testimony 19- s 1 Number Page Number Zo t il~ a, S ' ~ Title Title 3, lines 293-295 t ° - Z _ , 7 ' x Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard ` 'W f _ Proponent(s) 2 i r- - S - g k 4 'r'k v Without the provision of specific definition ofwhatthis refersto (w'hat . - Proposed document?, what definition of water quality? What is beneficial use), the reference I'R 4 - ~ r ` Amendment to OW1tD and DEQ have no meaning. Accordingly, revise the lints to read "B. t' " y ' Water Quality. The purpose of these standards is to protect and allow for ~ - r enhancement ofwater quality associated with beneficial rues as-def brthe ' - N a - ~'.,~F+ t. E ~ I„gs=rr ~Y i Staff Analysis The Title 3 model ordinance will refer to the specific DEQ and WRD code v ` 3 4 r, defining beneficial uses. "Beneficial use" is a term of art used to describe the . r_ s} , r 3 many competing uses for water. Some of these are agriculture uses, urban ; v ~a drinking water sources, fish habitat, etc. h n %Ox 4 ~ ~ kll,p . - ~O s 1" 1 Executive , i Specific referrnxs to already defined terms help clarify infest Recommend retain` G"~~ 7 ter -!sting language ,r , Recommendation 1, t <z E 't I w v ~ 11. ~ ' MPAt: S s Recommendations a fi tR Y L 7 ° n + { kr, =-11 e r Ruz _r - _ - 3 r r-r 4 K .J i } i - -1Y E a ' 3 June 5, 1996 Page 30 , , s ~ + x, - f v ri *%°~*.~+rmea.'rts _samacr,....^-F- _ _ .y.:*, t- j! s' ~,vp,'F If } fF _ - _ 777777-.-- I - / - - F S E5 E. . J 4 --~-,`~),I~ ~,4'i L2 , ~ ~A S_ t7' _ r t J'' n.t - t c 4' a - 1 i t' ? s i, d - Syr y F p. d' - i T-k # 5 { - f x# ' 7 F Y _ f..,,. ST t {4 'F7 , - , - I- ~ i ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ . , ~ - " - ,~7 ~ I - r - , j, , _ _ _ . - - V_ l - _ ~5 L~- .i- ! j t i - at s 1 i w , . . f M,Mt a„„rl - - - - 1g .4 ~ s z- - amt ,;s 4. - d - - ~,5ym...4J'`vyN9i7r J - - t ---i -1 ~'k - _e'^.; _ { M R~ ..fit s a eY ~ _ _ . , w ..I ~ ~ - ~ , - - ,a 4 Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan r r x S - - - ` 4 `¢x 4 ter" - Amendment 4 w , R _5 i -F + 31 Testimony 20. M Number Page Number , - `t. C C _ '6e "A k~`vvl z 'r{ Title ' Title 3 lines 298-301 z = _ E 'v. _ F~ - - 7 y of 1 igard ' Eicoli, Mayor, Cit ' Proponent(s) t - x i t 1 i,sF t, Proposed Without having the standards referred to as anattacltmeattbere is no way to s Amendment determine what this will mean fora ]Deal jurisdiction. If it is a permit that is Yet' nexssary from the State, then it is not necessary to include in this document ~ 4 . s Accordingly, delete the following: ` J s ba x v' ys- - c .'r Er . I ate' - ;v - tom'; r X L Staff Analysis This spetxiic language has been removed by WRPAC and MTAC in its joint z : ~ - `-sir s proposed language for Title 3 dated May 23, 1996. Both committees have r,~~ recommended that this language be included in the model ordinance. - r- ~ a , an~ nxzf 'I b a a ` ~ fi 7 a r I ~ . Executive With the nplncemmt of the WRPAC/MTAC , drat:, concur with removal of above ' r , " Officer } N k language. r Recommendation ~t . r r } r +4 3 f s 4 MPAC S ,4 ~ FF1 Recommendation : r S -f _ 1 t f _ - } p x _ June 5. 19% _ "N : Page 31 k - z' -t - mm. r i h r- rkr , F ~ , , ~ ~ , r ~`f s i §f r~ f, "4.s1~~}:RE!?^a`+w-^F ,w. .i~ F " t Y 4 t .i. - 3 _ _ j i'C- 'L d F 1 F ' "4 '''3 i G y - - , ~ ; ~ , ~ - . 1. ' r ~ . - . _ ~,_~~,"~r, J.;-~',~,~~L~`%,'~,~~,~~' Ll _U~"-' ` ~7 1 ~ . . _ - I ~~"L;i:IA ~;,,t,~.~~ .~,.r " ~ LE , r ~ ~ r : , -~L . I r ~ I I ~ ' i ' ~ ~ - kX r f, + fi, z t rc - - - t TI 2 Y - } TH Y - 7 fi r I" * - - , ~ . ~ I, r ~ . ~ . , , M , I E , , L~,,,' ~ , ~ , - . ~ w v_ ' t v. - s L..- .v .t _v_._._. 1~.,_. ,,,,j .._..i3, =A~:~z _.i - rte: a~ € r fi 14 y - - t ~Iz z 7't Vii' z0M 4t't Ij t E6 I y a° tf C t~Tety t k _ a £ rx- K C £ _ ~ - P roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan + ' ,0 Ij_ t 11-14 6 I 3 't I„5 g{ i -k Amendment 32 Testimony € e 4 Number Page Number , t# Title Tidc 3 -lines 303-305 }t~£ q i i - Y ~ M M t Lm Nir_li Moyne Ciwnf T,•. M U x r ~`.r Qm- k' t 1 Proponent(s) i I ~ n~ f { t E-y Yom } Pf I; _ _ ?t a _ ~ Without having the document or that portion of the document specifically referred ~ , , , y a. , t r i Proposed to, then is no way to determine whether this is an appropriate standard for a & i ~ -t`" k , ~N c , , 1 Amendment growth management document Accordingly, delete: r by 1-J Y 4 S^a'F'«'j'y4 F3, y' e - and 4 y*1 y ,F I A 3G tS I' 41 -0,; ~.TY'4~' -,y't Y;!i , - .11 y - t Staff Analysis WRPAC and MTAC have agreed that this specific language be removed from F i z--_,02 Rl t~ 5% I 'I R„ F s 41 ' ti k Title 3 and included in the model ordinance. See WRPAC and MTAC Tide 3 z' u i ~ k - w r recommendations dated M 23, 1996. , f , , - -111-1 Saw . v 6 f=," s t - z fi~a 9 - $ i-~ P ' ~ . w . - r ' Executive With the lacementoftlieWRPAGMTAC ` t rep draft, concur with removal of above ~ ° h r Officer language. , ; ,4 3 r~" ~ , Recommendation y w,„ ado s-% f ; f Recommendation s ~u'# f x t .p - r.- ' ,t -11 p R'x` y, d v 4M f a- 5 FF tF s ' Y S u~ ~`r 4 June S, 1996 r z ri `r Page 32 , 7 Y r y r . 7..t i } 'f , Mn.o t1 -r'~~' ~"r~~ - -2,~ -4--,~,'] - . -:-~,.-I £ t rt .3t •aw.,'x~#a - .a~ Axa .ter--x,v ^"°w'B - ) ; ' k - ' F,-'.Vs r 1 - - P~ `n F t r s .t e _ _ t - t? a7 5 -3-- s t t - - t'~ 1~sY - f ~6 iv^a~ i C ~r - r _ _ L t a 3 - _ - - t 9 - T~ L {[Fr ~p t , F j , , - - - . M . ' : , ~ , ~ , ~ _ , , , . _ , ~ ~ ~ r- ~ , I I ~ r , _ _ ' r i , _ ' ;,r,:,? _ r ,r- T R a r 1 F,+t - w _ r - t -._T,,s k k' a 3 F, - a ) x #uI k1^ 'e -.S i 'P„ S. - f ''S As'f ^~`-'Sr- - - SS - U` e z Lq -f'k~ - ,,,~C 't"~rz-- - - fit. - _ 4 ,f = ,;:.a.,e..~`.....-' .,±a.~uzav..„.a~.._..._.~,_.- r,.~ws.~m.2.te::.:~uca.,.~.,..~.Y,....~:__~__.: -.z 't. -t s, - .,:y.,.- - d a ; Spa-- _ ' 4 r ~*}1~ -N - -p „nary " } s.. r a -f "y ' ~roposcd Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional plan u~ i x' Amendment, Number 35 Testimony 21 Page Number Title - Title 3 -lines 328-331 ' ' < p { e .z s' - } _ h Proponent(s) Jim Niwli, Mayor, City of Tigard } <r s s r - - _ a~ Until it is ]mow what the substant9 _ { Proposed ally equivalent e8xt ofthe Metro Water ; '5 k Amendment Q~ and Flood Management Model Or' E as follows: durance ts, section should be deleted OK~ ~ i ~~€t~ -a w~.`n-c1_ L -~-'-"d . - . I _ _ _ - ---o ...wc Ii r;Mrz ` - - - ` j_rvJ Fro.;«a .,..q i i,~.`"1` a Staff Analysis This section describes the laud use 5 h f y requirements of Title 3 while still all tools local jurisdictions can use to meet the - ~r * ' - ordinance owing for development The Title 3 model cE '4 - Will establish specific performance standards and ma - a resources which local jurisdictions must ro p the affected < ,6 ~ x ~ p test , } r . &".W a ~ ~ F -11 f - a- €y+ _ - Lc iN Y~ 3 l ~i'YC~ 'h ti -ix l E 4 T ~5 ~t Ah Executive r - r ' Officer Transfer of development rights is a trsefiil tool ' Property owner aehiev that can help to ensure that a A x Recommendation conservin es the density local utti¢g may suggest _ while still g important resources. Recommend no { chaa ~ ~ i 8e to existing language, ; i, W" 1 MPAC - y4 Fpp - 6 Recommendation `5 r i - X LL L June 5.1996 ~ i m-.. Page 35 t { , f A. ' a - _ t_~1~ r w e - S f A k f f - _ _ y - - - - - - G ' _ i L -ft F r2 - x P . } _ - _ - ' - , - -i F r '"I t t E 3- - - _ _ _ . Am . Am _ _ +s.a._ - s. _ti II - y,.- _._y 5..,:. c., I...~ .__....,s 1-` r_. __;'.,._.:.3'? g C tr ,-32 ~ -t _ q~°•- y r f - ` - Y,e - , t -4.. y . 3 d 5 Y - - hl . - . : GV 6 am sn w _ _11Ji, Z.Iw..GCII-. . - ,_.._-•---.+.+.:-.asr, - f j 'd - Tt d Y i t t f t' _ a Proposed Amendments to.the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan X _ , i , . , Amendment 36 Testimony 69 I Number Page Number I 11 . ~ - , ~'-,',~,;-,'-~~-~4"",~,~"ir"--"~~',.!r _~:;j, - ~ I Title Title 3 -lines 338-344 f } y t H R -j Guy Orcutt -Association of Northwest Steelheaders ` x Proponent(s) € 1 {n F F - i` r { revise these lints w :..way: "Twr pL• i~e- of thecte standards-is-to prCCidCr I i Amendment n agciiesaiiileotutUestOdeitixnxSiu2dleat x >lbcse - ? I SICK $R t 1 - i ~ - Y~ l aarra s o • " _ Ffi!!S4E 1rP?hongiheifftLX~~• in - - - $ S A a 4 This section is the intent section, intended to broadly stateshe goals of the title. % ' r y _j ` a r w Staff Analysis (~i q, z _ z "E_ i~, , r ' 3 r~3 3. _ p Executive Amend the language to read "The propose of these standards is to provide s Officer recommendations to cities and counties to protect and allow for enhancement of s Recommendation Ian t, rnugra_ a fish and wildlife.... i III > r 1 , . MPAC * . Recotmnendation " - o- o r, 6 1 -t . r . t~~ f -1 1 iIemg , v ,1 June 5, 1996 Page 36 r r. r we..a F 1 t f J F f YC1 "1 J _ t f ,T - Sr fr' f 6 [tprF, y"' - _ S 1 - } . - ~ - " - - - - ; - ; - I-r, " , ~ " Iro'l-, , ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ " . I .1 - , , . , A - Y_ t r 1 F"in^_ v.~._+r~.. nT^.r _~-n-+-.-~ _ -.-r^r~ L,' fi 0 .men.-.".~.s.• - . ,.r,_ _ - - v a . ys r 'sv.-a~ .d _ '`£..a..v - - - ~.,..~..R____.,__......u......~.~_....~s.,aa-..~i~•-~.a.....-~ - _._......,...~:o-~,r~.s....ra.sw:m..... - _ - gar - L ~ f k. `7 .z 4 roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Amendment 37 Testimony 70, Number Page Number 111 " Title Title 3 -lines 350-351 - Guy • . t • C ~ r w Proponent(s) Orcutt, Association of Northwest Steclheadcrs (proposal a) E- Callison (proposal b) k- a < t 5 a) Revise lines to read: Utility construction Proposed - c~dsts within x r Amendment: a .:rte where ~ ~FOeEw 0.. -ibeaoi~f3~ts Y ~ ~M y ~ apt t' 4_1 taut r i«etlietz~mgu artnfthc z- _ tz:- b. Delete ex+ e:eptions Dla and refer back to WRPAC. I Staff Analysis t ' r }r a) Specific requirements regarding utility or other construction will be described s_ in the Title 3 model ordinance. b) There are cases where utilities must cross Fish and Wildlife Conservation Areas 1 y because there is ao alteraative. Both WRPAC and MTAC have acknowledged the a 4, _ need for utility exceptions. MTAC has added "transportation faciliti es es " to utiliti 4 r in this exception section. The model ordinance will fully describe the specific conditions for exeptions. r} F Executive k With the adoption of the WRPA Officer GMTAC revisions to title 3, believe concerns have been addressed- { Recommendation n t~ E 7 ' MPAC Recommendation K g t t~, r ~ E t' Jame 5. 1996 j c r Page 37 ~a } vI, ~a r' h ,5~ 4 ` k v~ 'W y T 3L i roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan i Amendment ( 4 38 Testimony W - 1 Number Page Number l l l 1 .3 Title Title 3 -lines 352-354 Guy C7cutt, Association of Northwest Steelheaders (proposal a) - x y ~ Proponent(s) E. Callison (proposal b) - - Proposd a.) Reviu section "b. Overhead or underground electric Proposed eablettlevisioniines po,WecoumeaLOnsand NT ~;,xun! Amendment Vtt~l7nx~sewaraiaiRrjgtitefapyy~jgy-r pnecmB~~?~iv~X'...~-'1$esseat~8eulyrdA ~ n iit ire _ RPtNp4Oty~vPla+usats4s~eriuane"rL_~ "S O~[abOrtd.,~• y a~arra--~iN.lmyz~.scy}~b~P6plN6\'f{$+~.wwiw•t 9. -i ff h.- _ M A~p'W~.witliiti;p~ian~arra: ' Mq":~""F?a6s4>>~'~at~tie¢;u~ualx3tsi,t~vea2rava w..._ ,~•ktc?Ft4r,~A.,.Gc~a'Sinr£ms°t~,"~a,,,~»~v.II ..uodis ~ ~3 - F Eis Uz Proposal b.) Delete exceptions Dlb and refer back toWRPAC. Ki c f R ` t7rz~ Staff Analysis a) The terms and conditions under which exceptions are allowed will be described - r } in the Title 3 model ordinance. 7 { F"U b) Both WRPAC and MTAC have decided to allow for this exception with the s ? " F understanding that under certain conditions there are not alternatives for utility Crossings. ` rt - - 'r F-n 1 Executive With the adoption of the WRPACWTAC revisions to title 3, believe concerns _ 5' f7 ' r a Officer have been addressed ~t Recommendation 4 7 k k-p j 3 i d z F ' ~ MPAC Recommendation r'i s _ Y y E + 4 a y F r I j-- y ~ t 4N,}t l 1~l~ June S. 19% 4 7 Page 38 E ~ 11ai RC • A 1 ' _ } t S _ i 3' C l i ~ - - - x?~;'!r."1s""'G`f'Yw°`^r' t !Y 4i "K P 1 is - - - _'r" _ K 5y G •5 _ - - - - - . j F _I d t j 7 r - x na' ' - j, s tyE Y- 3~'S~•. $Si,•~h-`'aiCi~ S f -L~7 x~~k~ r i _1 i r' a. - a - - - } t sh ~I~ -:rte - .N", a. xa.x - :twxxy"a.:uC.LkCla2 'i - i{,R -k-r t3K L P .-EN X3,4,-i y fR Yqx G. - 4 - 1 i s 5k S - - 3 `tiY i 3 f~ r- t'Ft.' ' ~ t - roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional plan g w V " i; - -a d~ ,y x - 4 Amendment 1 s1 39 Testimony ff "r j r r Number a Page Number ~ ~-'~Ii~il' ~~'~"'-"--"-"t~' ; ~ . ~ i ] ~ , L Y x e o it x !ate Title Title 3 - lines 355-357n + { t ~Jy Y f Guy Orcutt, Association of Northwest Steelheaders W a ~ T Proponent(s) , , 1- K-- > 4 5-t ~,a Y' W - I s P" , Proposed rtvise language to read Trails, boardwalks and vi^~u g stcas construction - .r 'b> , ~ t ivnendment .11 , 1111.1- IC where local jurisdictions determine 5 that the nattueal ftmaions of the arse act not harmed by such construction and _ ~ I a - e when habitat frier design a ~a tilt' is used along with mitigation such as e~uivalat~ t widminoen! ~l a y:ai _ _ FF - 'T~ s , ~ i u # Try try x f y - M5 G f } ~ ~fr R , Stab Analysis The Title 3 model ordinance will sa 7 i Y speedy the conditions under which trails, . ~ a~ ~ wg stand wardds for and mitigaon c= be constructed and determine minimums? " ,a" '13 ' , i s I _ in I r . a . f t Executive KS~E'i With the adoption of the WRPACJMTAC revisions to title 3, believe sorceress ' Officer ` kyR ~ ` Recommendation have been addressed > p A z F # 'lkL4 di Ad rf{2•..rv i G MPAC k x _ r Recommendation ~ fS~ `t ~ . . , r i - ~ ~ kyys ;j F _ y } t - L-- 4r1 -d ;Y ! t./ h 3 --y£ r k a - Z _ i r June S. 19% - Page 39 j--'r*; Mn~6 - ,'-~c.-xl y flit a - -t t' It P t - - A - s } Y-} _ i Z - U - ~ ~ - i : - ' ' , ~ M1 ' 4 - ~ - r rt ~I - F - -~.i"~ '~.-;'-_-'~"!'."~,i "i. ~~f - f k 4i -s- } - - - - a - f _ , i.x fi. 4 Y F ` f i. t..,t..,.~~ f _ r _ ,a `~-.orw- - •i--F t 4 - - - - - - - t rte, ,,,7, ~ ,g k.,. _ _ _ - _ - rv x st - ;r ` iiiiiiii g ""xwz + i a nacu ._:v.s......~,n a t,u'.~.-. - - i _ _ ~ 4' 4 _ -17 11 `L e ":.C S'p t Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan ~ra ' t r -'j'-w; Amendment 40 Testimony 21 `J 4 i 4 5 _ Number Page Number 1- y- - x x - Y I - , ] I] ~-,i ,,-,-,,-~P-,~k, I Title Title 3 -lines 361-365 A _ _ r w , 11 y - , t - _ Jim Nicoll, Mayor, City of Tigard Proponent(s) t M - m = t ~d ~r §E;3 v a _ -A - _ q Y#-y 't', .may # 5 x y, Ir. r ; c - Since no Metro approved list of plan nor a Metro prohibited list of plane exist, 3~ ' , 1"' Amendment revise language as follows: q s _ - ? °Rcquire the revegetation of disturbed areas with native plants to 90 oerrr~! co,- f 4 within three years. Disttubed areas should be replanted with native plants on the . approved locally adopted plant list e V,4 I -1- ~ ~ kf }U yam' Slta}}bCprVhibttL'r~" a AtS -ws S 'g 4' r ~,.Y* A . tit {,fi k` ~11 11 '1'5 I j Staff Analysis The "Metro Prohibited Plant List" will be developed when the Title 3 model / I 1- gx t ordinance is writtan Title 3 does not become effective until the ordinance is , ez; - f , r t adopted and the plant list will be available at that time. I jL ~ E 4~ - as - With the adoption of the WRPAC/MTAC revisions to title 3, believe concerns x ; (]freer i 3 have been addressed. Recommendation r , a T- '1- t i, n r.1 ~-x'V~ - MPAC S = e ~ Recommendation w {1 6 ! - LRF' t l Q 61 i x t r hlax t, _ k 3. , f,` E"t fi R. x" t I 1-1- , V ? June 5, 1996 Page 40 r r ' s' c E of „ •-s ,--f rn.o rr - N 4~ ~ t er - t 'S-. - #r < ; 1 , _ ~ -~.nnaa. =tT'~wa ,'r_ 'v -r: w w,e .>.v-f *zr.3't I 1. YY t kt}' - 5 - h ! [ :I 1L 4F r - - 12 - ~ ` rr ~ r, _r_ - -1: - ~ , ; - ~ - r ~ ~ , ~ " - t~'.~,J~ n f^ ~r ( , #y F y l 4. 'Z` -f Y t- d 5 J le T s r t 4 3 r i . ~r..~.-~rtF.r+"^'t.`+~•F ..c`~. 'l^ am..['~~~^^~~r d..r.._. _...z _ ~h'~,"_ -,r-'-'cT ~-'.!Tr. _ _ --1-... a.. r~ - _ a, x Lug: ~ ..c . ~ i .r. ._.t. t r ~ ~ i i.. ~ 0. _.~~.wT.i.._. d kz' _ .;s as 5 - gyp, ti - _ - - r - - - f 3i T - 't ..a."Lrb'.a3 _ - -yy yid, '0 . ~ 4 . - F - ,R SJ, - i Y -1 _ I " - _ - _ - auu.S4.S~.w:=3w..,b...3~st...'>x...,«_.~_... urd1:.:.3:.z=sawax,,. -.•...e_.._. a a_.......w.._~_- - viuesg`m at'n'7- S - qTm i ~ - - a >f - r a 1 y -.'x -ems - S - 1 - i- - - /i i - 3 4 c { nroposed Amrndmrnu to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functions! Plan 't 3 - aa~ r 1- y 4~ S 2i i1 5 Y 4 f, -~S - V _ j w: , Amendment 41 Testimony 21 a~ # u. Number Page Number D ' Title Title 3 -lines 366-370 x"'_ i,' S Tr . t £ - y~.i i, ~'e 1. i Jim Nicoll, Mayor, City of Tigard 11 I IT Proponent(s) I Ifth F ere are specific requirements for in-stream development activities from the Proposed documents that are referred to that should be adopted regionally, then those? ~i _,:T~ .i. - .11 ; : Amendment requirements should be made a part of this document rather than included by~ .11 reference. Accordingly revise language as follows: ( s ~ { Limit 1. " f?ga>xr development activities l that would impair fish and wildlife during k J ~ a key life-cycle events ag-tothe i ccmili `4 - r 'Ok L K a' L" to Protect fish mid Wildlife Resomccs.- sa _ - r., -.~#'r 4," VM- ~*M'AW{. ~1 I 11 1. `V,3 , Staff Analysis Staffrecommendsthat referencestotheODFW guidelines give clan and the - ~4~ Kti r most technically sound guidance to loce1jurisdictions and ensure there is M- ~ E'j ; , consistency between jurisdictions in how this work would be carried out -I I - Y 'C q-'l t,LXfS ' i ti; li3 f 1 'Y `e _ - - 1 ~ ~ ~ f, t 7 S ' s c E n z ~ 'f i r Officerive Recommend that existing language be retainedz~j t Recommendation N I ~ t t r r'a MPAC -a;,, - Recommendation { 7 LM t # ' ] 1 t{ n TM, Y µ1 1 , c ~ - ' , t , f l t June 5, 1996 Page 41 1 F ' ~ 1 1S V. t t ro 1 J s 7 - - S . r ry "s} - - - - - Y' - d 1 , ~_~~'u'.;'~ ~ " L . : : : , r, - r I , ~ ' " - , f ' ' 1 - - Ls l}4~S k / S- I 7'Ii ; + f (ice I rq E{ * r y r' y tt+~,r i~.;. - - - 1WE •~~.t'u Y5 s.~r t~ r f a - r . - - r - r, "ME 'ky~k~.+ R ~L S F ~ R ~ x. ,F......r e. ••3t,.:...CUUUw....+ m j ~ - t 9 + 9`.tst •.^,.v..°,^'.`" { tea, a )y„' - 4 b ~ X ak{'y13.cfti -T1 J 3. - 3 r t ` s~f _ 5 m Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, z kpy _ J Y- j rT•~ 'Y I- +t Wry t a Et s A 7 S vi - r ` U a Amendment 42 Testimony 21 ra € }x Number Page Number ~ i F Tile Title 3 - lines 371-372 u a 4 tc ; Jim Nicoli, Mayor, Cityof Tigard tQ, Proponent(s) =;r 4 { _ t y t' - '~•~-ate' ~r r Local input mast be assured as part of any ESEE that is accomplished by Metro. g- : a - Proposed Accordingly, revise the language to read: Amendment i " Metro shall complete LCDC Goal 5 economic, social, environmental and energy r (ESEE) analyses by beginning with the inventory of local ESEE, m[s;1ucAl input, t f~ s< Kim j and identifying gaps that..." . ;z., jX s x, ;'Ot 5' } -AJfi -7G S~ f Staff Analysis WRPAC and MTAC have recommended new language that replaces lines 371 to 375. Refer to the joint WRPAC and MTAC language dated May 23,1996. This ` a proposed language states that Metro will use =rising Goal 5 data developed by local'unsons. to identify inadequate or inconsistent data and protection of J 5 Goal 5 resources. Metro shall then complete Goal 5 ESEE analyses for mapped* F regionally significant fish and wildlife habitat areas only for those areas where ~rT inadequate or inconsistent data or protection has been identified. t VINO JVI - Ezeetrtive With the adoption of the WRPACIMTAC revisions to title 3, believe concerns have beta addressed t Officer £ry rt - iv Recommendation rr t 4 MPAC Y c1 `'*-'mot _ s Recommendation ax-.f_,ahw,~r,x a ! P June 5, 1996 Page 42 t' v+ as k k~`3t 4 d k -tylZ J 4 ( L 77- 37 - Y Y K a ,tea " x64 2 kn,- - - s - R r? 'e,..,,,s,•,,,:` u, ~riaaa.,..m-.,,..y..>e:,,r~,;.._.....,.w_.._.__.,....,.,.aus,.a.:o..s..;~.Aa...,.........---'_.__ .w. - i _ } -MM a D s xt ~roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan w y xz - ` Y" Amendment q3 Testimony 21 } Number Page Number r4 2 y~ Title I iUr 3- Lines 378-379 It y k z i a F f Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard Proponent(s) tr t~ ~ v``, f e a Jurisdictions should be given time to address the provisions.of this document and J r 4 Proposed incorporate appropriate provisions Amendment into their comprehensive plans and ordinances. st { Accordm2ly revl[e!a -Ag~to reel. s title shall not become effective until the Metro Council has adopted a Model Code and map that addresses all of the ' provisions ofthis title. its s.- r 5 a „ rx r'~ a.s a ,i 1 ~ wl O a"~'k 4 k 4 - Staff Analysis This title will become effective as soon as it is adopted as model code by the h ` Metro Council. This Urban Growth Management Functional plan is being developed so that implementation can take place immediately and to avoid loosing .5 4 M y E" current opportunities to achieve the Re on 2040 Concept Local jurisdictions will have ample opportunity to participate in the development of the model ordinance language. There will also be a 16-month period for local jurisdictions to change j their local comprehensive plans to be consistent with the Urban Growth T n , Management Functional Plan. r E _ 3 4 Executive Recommend no change to existing language. Officer a - _ Recommendation 4 4 3 ~ f~ t MPAC Recommendation June 5,19% r Page 43 t • rn~d h a 3 }d` jSi ~ L .Z- t 4n f ~ E S C C `v 0 n -,t t y _ y x ~r 71, ,1 ,2 - 1 --A'4-?fit - 4•f'" f- - - - d ra y - 't j t - - s ' _ .a s - t _ a Y a• - - 'ti p fir - - kt- - ; ,;F 3 rf- -'S.,a.c" - - t t - - -.W.. .A..,,a....,~a.aura.cu.:-_, - - f a i h, - B £ X33, S 4 _ ,ry°,£ w #s4+~ - ....+.+.wr.mr,......*','a:__,,,,.,p~y..,n., k a t . e ' r 5 a --'Y; i e i D roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan c P ' i Amendment 44 Testimony 1010 22 - a _ qJ Number Page Number col u; i ,''s r ? ~ 4 Title Tide 4 - General h i x f? Gordon Faber, Mayor, City of Hillsboro (a) F r f , j Proponent(s) Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard (b) - s h ) - ;,V) Mark D Whitlow, Bogle & Gates (c) ts. 7r (a) Hillsboro lacks commercially-designated sites that are suitable for such outlets t u ~ Proposed and must look to its industrial and employment ateastoprovide such sites when ~ ~ + Amendment needed in the fitur Hillsboro d~ not support Title 4's restrictions. . '7q ` ' Title should be deleted Etn 1oot a t and industrial areas are intended to be r ' Fri mixed use local planning commissions city councils should be allowed to p , w I determine that mix of use. ~ - = i (c) Prohibiting retail uses larger than 50,000 feet of gross leaseable area will r -"-N s r impede future commercial development Prohibition should be specific focus of at 4 x 1 ~ . t -x i ]cast one public workshop. p u~, ' ~t °~f . s3Q t 4 t v The Urban Growth Management Functional Plan allows jurisdictions , using the err t Staff Analysis Metro 2040 Growth Concept Map, to designate aeas r where they believe that large ~ ' ' y scale retail commercial uses maybe appropriate in employment or industrial areas. , ~z ~ . -,k i «r t~ e K - ~ s i Executive Believe that the existing language provides the oppommity-for local jutisidictions f I v ' V t Officer to mekc exceptions. Recommend no change to existing tcxt 4 v7~i Recommendation ks3j xyr s .1 3rd cam,vi S 4 i w; -N, f .r ikO'I ! r , z- - I MPAC % ~ Recommendation llf r - -1 % iF ~ t b l_ - Z .k" `-t d € A r Jame 5. 1996 n ~ ;y k 's ~y ' r r: 3 - y f Page 44 wcr.o k ; v~ t^"" - f € _ _ ~ ~ t 1 t•` fit{{ i' - f„ kr-' _I f f 1 awl 4~"- ' X - ax - _m+y. --Y'3 .x_t M--m.w.-'"m3 9b#T-9X fi, ? t - 9.a - F - 4 G ` t Y i i S✓ s - C1'-,'r,- '--'~--'~J LLL - - , : r . I ~ , ~ Ar I - I - - r- 5 G Y, $tf 1 _ _j - _ ~ - - L k t 1 j - - 2a ~ '--r" t' _ r - r~ - - ,4 s r ' 5 - - rn • k i s z z - - - T, 71 "tt srt` K r s-F Ct •k Y C t :ry4 k v}- roposcd Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional plan fa Amendment t-~ - (45 Testimony ao, ay, 0-7 az, , Number U Page Number .7 1-Tr 97 s Title 'title 4 - General (cont.) A M 4 s Z , Jon Chandler, Homebuilders Association of Metropolitan Portland (d) Proponent(s) Mike Wells, National Association of Industrial and Office Properties (e} r F ® j L Robert L. LeFeber, Mayboume Real Estate (f) (d) What is the ex - j pectation under 2040 for shopping arras - are we going to rely & jJ Proposed entirely on catalogs? t Amendment --(e) R--taill c.opmcni is not encouraged anywhere. Metro needs to clearly define } 4r retail shopping areas inside and outside of employment and industrial areas- E - (f) Jurisdictions should be allowed to open employment and industrial areas to retail. By banning mail from areas that previously allowed retail development, t Metro would be down-zoning these areas, which would be a potential regulatory a tag' Y a - fi,a a t t t F 5 Redevelopment and infill are expected to provide substantial opportunties for all Staff Analysis uses - especially mail commercial. The Curter City, regional centers, town amen, mainstreets and corridors are all areas where retail commercial is planned' p k - and encouraged. -YN fi. .~.g Fi~F" , _ Executive Recommend no change to existing language. _....s4 n Y Officer 011 1,t Recommendation r3Y r t -+.~`z - MPAC k- t Recommendation s Y t` ¢-A Jl'S "OT 6 E p y _ v z A % TT 7 Yf t ~ ~ d June 5, 1996 a a Pagc 45 Sf MLinO ti lY" `n i' _i " 77777 -t - - - ` d \ 71 ~ f k - - - 'ley ~i Rt,_ l _3~ - - - _ ~.Yd ( d 1 i f l~ ~ - . - - - - - ~ - , "L V M s ` - s _ st x! Vie- - 0 - , ~ , , - , ,W - ,-~.11-,-:, ;I W. - - ~ I 11 ~ -,U 1 ~ , r f O t a - i C. s pia r J 1- Z - d - S L _ } c- P 1- 14 u r £ `qq roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Managemrnt Functional Plan I y w { -F 4 - - Amendment 46 Testimony 86 ' n 9 Number ,u$ zr x n Page Number f A ~ _a _ --.3 g n. a w a. t Y Title Title 5 - General fil } r ;t - z Jon A. Chandler, Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland t'y1 , .1 , Proponent(s) fig- 32 ON - ili- a - Y• 1. ..y 4F'J t - - i s - .,Y,. Tie wu~.c`yi ufi was re3CIVC is proDlematic - there has never bCCn an explanation _ I;Z11 ~ 1y~ d ] Proposed as to why an additional designation is necessary for land already off-limits under - i Amendment current n E t 8 ->sft4 - t- `j t Z- 1 {et-i 4Y'° F 3 # r~ u - - x rtw3, - 1 Rural reserves, adopted by the Metro Council, are intended as a statement about ` tM {-x - x r '41 , + Statf Analysis . where urban r." t I growth boundary expansion is not Planned = jtutas urban reserves ~y ` < are intended to indicate where expansion is planned , ~R - 11 I E : z ' ' a z z . .fig ~ Y4- T ti"` S ' ,ace a sP Executive a - L- - ~ cF Metro has made a clear statement about how the region should grow. It will G , ) ' Officer determine the location Of urban reserves and has made its policy about where the ; , e i3 um ~ b Recommendation boundary should not be expanded Recommend no change to existing language. s" $ r > L 't 'Y.. T. - - ' t v ^r -r 5 < ~yW~~r, f- .3 f- 4t' L. - f y MPAC I„ r u i- Recommendation t r a- , k s v~~z w ` L ~'?t t t - L { June 5, 1996 c e x - , _j'f ` Page 46 _ c~~ - VaEa/--,;, it tt ` MR11C `bbf, . lk - . 4 1~ - i- - , .,w X3+.2 S _ y-{ q , _ - - td 34 t b p 3'r } ,i a- ~r4t t~ i _ r.. - " t'- t ! S -L: _ IL I _ ,mom,. ..rsaa,~a~~^.-,tt _ '~q rr t - -,j 1 t - t Y - 3 k _ - z - S s i - - - < [s<L- rz2`7 b G - v J F S r -`t ' l ° - - y r Nr J Y f - N v',+°k- 4' - r M1+.k.' 'r i N , E J - k I F f t { - ~ I I I , 1, . , _ , , r , i; - ~ - ; t . r : . I r , : i ~r - I . _ . ~ _ - --10 " J 4 .w.~_..,_ ..11 ~cv- - -..._.,r.~~.~. . u L .e.= ..i.. _.....,.'v..t~[ _v .l _ - v.-~_Rk,.... -i.- - _ :v i... _4_... - 1 ...~...L b--. v. ri t 1 - - - rr _ _ _e - - - q f, ^c r - k cr i Z } - - s+ - a Y 6 _ - - q,_ a - - tT- - - - tf< Y 4 f - L{ { - ..._....~...,_...w.w Vv.~.:ra _.....w..e..La~....w..++.vunu,ssV...~.+.v.V `.v«~a"s.a:.`ra}.'aaa.w..+--»...x~_»-. h t N h'i 5 , _ - r _x s r - - Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, r~ r c , ~ Amendment 47 Testimony 3 t ` w w - Number Page Number a ii~~;; " 11 z Titte Title 6, Section 2, Lino 455-458 and 460480 k - ` k.. x_ ti x III a k k11 City of Gresham s . p : t Proponent(s) y r r s -S t 3 'h I I s Kry areas eslong corridors should be supported by pedestrian-friendly sweet design. r y}; z Proposed Revise lin 455-458 to read: amenity-oriented boulevard it eatment that beta saves k c ~ Amendment pedestrian bicycle and transit travel in the central city, regional ccuias, urein ,tea;, a~.cn 11 ~ ~t z centers. corridor intersections and mixed rue commercial districts slon¢ corri dors and " - _ r station communities nrr"c is a key step is overall implementation of the Metro 2040 ~ + Growth Concept "Revise lines 466-468 to read '...pedesCi b' c e and transit-oriented - L , design elements are the priority in the central cityand regional centers station $ ; . , - communities, main streets, corridor intersections and mixed use commercial districts along ~ 1-a , corridors. and town centers. Revise line 481 to add the following "I Other state of the art ~ , street design elements which give prio ' to pedestrians and transit " - ~m wt s _}~6 'Ltd The bicycle mode is an important component in the region's strategy to provide a> ` a i, fx Staff Analysis multi-modal transportation system The intent of the boulevard provisions is to s r~ -t w-' focus these amenities in the most concentrated areas of development F E z x ' f ";£.J } , .4' "05' - h t 9 '1- 01" M -J F Executive Recommend adding bicmIc- but not other requestedtevisi=:, Revise lines 455- m Y Officer 458 to read: "Therefore, the need to implement amenity-oriented boulevard ~ ' ' ~ ' y] Recommendation t S _ treatment that better serves pedestrii le and transit travel..." ~M 4 , , k 17 n , MPAC it Recommendation ' ;rra { - -%r ~ - _ r, e , i s 'r i } r l z - r t _a _ _z ~..i _t+, f _ a - , Yr is Juste 5, 1996 r Page 47 an"o h - - s- r _ _ _ - - - j 'AX _ -.I 7' - _ y a _ - - : ft-1 5 4 h _ f _ 1 'y' 'e 'z ,1 t" - -I ! , ti li _ - - F _ r' ...i _.Y l hr-VTrwr --a--~• - _....:'..-iILet __i i~.. - y4>>z _ -4_~ .LL ~a v.tu -Y rs% £ } M.9 Z - P r St _ - = - - IF , - , t -~-v , . , , , - ~ I , * - ~ ~ , - - - .1h . I,, 1-1 i - w 4'"~" x5~ F. } rj~+1 rY.LC L k - o gym[. e, F - ..kkY~~~ ; , o1~E1yyy}} t t t - - , - - - ' - - - i C - L 'sxvr_itrsge:anY s3.ze...s~. _ _ ......,.w.ue k- , 1..._L.mo.aae+:._,__ - -F Q - h , rgYZ -V, 3 c { Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan y x 'B 11 Amendment 48 Testimon 4,81 ` - Number Page Number ' ` t h r £ t Title Title 6, Section 3, lines 483-538,503-505 and 519-522 ) a t , i► i 2 Mark Whitlow, Retail Task Force (a) 3 f P Proponent(s) sic McRobert Mayor, City of Gresham (b) a 'w , , -I _ t _ ti -A F i Sf i v " -t s -J`r 0.a i ,1 (a) Request further deliberation of the proposed minimum spacing Standards for pedestrian and s M" r r Proposed street connections. Requiring a maximum grid or block size for alijutisdietions throughout the f 3 a t , _ - - i Amendment region dos not appear workable. Request a public workshop on this issue. x: s tz ry a . " _ (b) There hub= no regional or local technical review and agreement on whether connectivity j - -ts'", ` ` t standards in the Design Option and Pafonaan« Option ane the right ones (e.g., eul.desacs no -i - r~~ i ,,,4j r'^'' ' -i longs than 200 feet, bike and pedestrian connections with minimum spacing of 330 f«t). M ~3 . Therefore, remove precise standards from A Design Option" and'B. Performance Option" and ct revise text to state that praise Design and Performance standards win be adopted in the RTP. This # ~ - ~ K t; . 2 ' 'F adoption should occur after substantial technical review in the RTP update process. 5A'».. t ~ A...4 . -aJ ~c rn Staff recognizes the need for more research on this topic and has begun a regional rt . . . .-.Staff Analysis street design study, which will include research on stred'spacing and connectivity ~ ,-M- ,o,~ i 0 a 4 issues (among others). The study will produce information to use in developing ~X auk°ri F long-term standards for street design and network connectivity. The standards ;v j r included in this funcdona! plan are interim standards which apply in the short term a~m j, and are based on language requiring 8 streets per mile as adopted in RUGGC)s. r s + g 'V This requirement, as written only applies to areas of five aces or more. a 5 - , -,z,,~~-,,t, , - , . 11" " H a ~ 3 ? 1, R A~ i i a ~j ~.~a,T s ~i ) , W $I Executive No change recommended at this time. is } -a ,V_ , c Officer ' , r ~ t §tt ` P Recommendation $4Y ~ `v 1 .S - m1 £ t j t Ai 7, - a E-,#YI: Z dY Y t K pC`+ _ l r5Y a, .1 I1~ r 1 t' j "i7 F4 t Y F MPI,ti - . Recommendation , s ce ~ ~ t'° 4" Y f7 Gr d - t[ t t t Afire'` i i. 4 Y 7 y r .c _ W r 't &R~a'~ I June 5,1996 Ty^ - v, - } a fi -,z ` i Page 48 " _ 1 j m... - .r f e .t r S, 3 , [ a I 3 5`,-, {r i r Y , - . k k _ I t t {r _ F- ) ~ 74 i V P,~~,~,~~-~ , ~ i - , IF t I S y " § f y - 4 { - t - _ x .L ' _ • _ _ d - .3l , - -r , - " I 11 I , I I ~ ~ . - - ~ - , 11 : 1. , : - ~ , ~ M , ~ , - I I - , . .Y - - - "-cy+-.~ _ e" - , - -Irani,-`: .11 , I.,-r7 ~ 7 T k _ I I r x Tv pv - } _ 1. ' f t I~+£ _ - IM f t 'i _ .BEY- h^ 2 -r gym,.-~.m.S.Y.au .ce__xcw..ssm-- rsts° "'a:a w...-_...__..._ ..1--i-_.__ 1 ~-71 ' R - ~ a `4AT al, w f'-x, - 5 M t - s Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan a L s_Ft ' -r r Q Amendment 49 - r - Testimony -6,29, w Number Page Number c h e Z l 2' 4 - ~ Title Title 6, Section 4, Level of Service Standards ` y - L-- n Stephan Lashbrook Planning Director, City of Wilsonville (a) rte: " w Proponent(s) Paul Thalhofer, Mayor, City of Troutdale (b) Y Gussie McRobert, Mayor, City of Gresham (c) l l t 1 (e) We have received little explanation for proposed changes to level of service standards. r ' f Proposed There needs to be considerable public information anddebate otherwise the.public f _ Y t"4 ' ` Amendment reaction to this provision alone could derail the 2040 pleasing process. S ; (b) and (e) It is premature to include Motor Vehicle Performance Standards in the UGM , ? Function Plan and should not be mandated for the entire region There needs to be further ~ 4 - : R-,~ - technical review and public comment co the proposed changes prior to inclusion in the - e r .1 ' - functional plea n , r, ~ i - _ , - i r_ - - I- 11 \ sr r - ~ x -Y'E 2"T V f z" As written, the Urban finowth Management Functional Ptah proposes a blanket change in level of ' r a ` - a .Staff Analysis service standards O.M. The Proposed LAS standards in Section 4 ofTnle 6 would apply to the i r - - f rr - regional nclwrork. However, the connectivity provisions of Section 3 are intended to support the - ~~:sr ~ r `kI . > - - LOS standards by serving more local trips on local street, with fewer local trips on the regional -.11 11 ~ r' + 1 ,1 ~ - _ system. WFule the Regional Transportation Platt may need to evaluate diffarnt IAS standards for ' g{ z"t _ d$erent reasons, those reasons need to be addmssod in the Regional Trruaportation Plan but not - - ` tretxsaanly in the functional plan. However, the concern that does need to be addressed in the _ t "-f e,. g functional plan is what LAS standard should be used as densities immue as a result of + = : fis - • implementation of the functional plan. E !h - . t- tL i Executive Recommend that if densities arc increased in the cenysl - erty;regionalern~ts,town centers,main t -s~yM~"' a _ Officer streets, station communities and corridors then we should allow them to use this revised LAS i ~ s c Recommendation to meet TPR requirements and to achieve a balance between land use and Additional analysis should be done for the RTP. r ,a - v h n ` _ ' M a MPAC . , I Recommendation - } t r aTN 4 ; t - a - fc + r~~ June 5, 1996 1 r^" b € Pa 49 " : - M- r 1 R f 7♦ - _ „t£=!r~r= . ~i + -:`same. 4 - If fy ~ . L I r I ' , ~r , - ' ' ' ~ I ~ ~ r - 11 ~ ; . e x r r - -,-3V 't i - N - - - - - - } l L r t fKW'. - - } - r t , 1 a _ t t - x _ Y_ z ~'t~ 171 - FJ ~.ix '-L's~- 4y'YRE 4 -gF 3 } - - t f ?0,-C", 3TV - s a i _'~.LS 1 FS _,''3. L s y ~i+,r , x - r v.SMSGL. Zb ,.,.ra.~....._ i rr- may` s ~ z I 3 ,f { Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan ' # 1 I a. 1z 11 , t *s y{$ s. 3 7x, y R 3, x r a .,..r Z jLr Amendment M Testimony to a, 1 t _ - Number Page Number i 4 h Title Title 6, Section 3, lines 492-538 t i ' r _ a - r - - z y r_t,c. u.~a..... f`iw .,f Hillehnrn S w-in+ 5 i m } V or. • u , ~r,w, v.~ _ s 3 C i Proponent(s) I I " I 11 - ,sue I a + Neighborhood-level road standards are appropriate only within local development ; 3 Proposed regulations. ~k ` + k Amendment r~ 1'. k"'F• ly.'''Seie'j.£ t rl,t Z i a ;nt ~Ifl I --1 a The cumulative effect of poorly connected local streets results in excess volumes r, 3 ° sg - t I , X } Staff Analysis of traffic needing to use the regional system to make local trips. The RUGGOs a z address the regional interest in increased local street connectivtity and limitationsf& o on cul-de-sac designs by recommending 8 to 20 local through streets per mile. (rx3- 1 i Improved pedestrian and bicycle connections are important to implementation of A ! the 2040 Growth Concept and are also identified in the RUGGOs. The RUGGOs were revised in December 1995 and reflect adopted regional policy. - , } t - _3 r' ~s R s r t- # it _r,?) p S t "r ~ rv e- 7'AS~g P Exeetrtive Recommend no change to existing text` r ~s i ' v Officer . r r Recommendation 3~ a r k t - N 2 1 MPAC s: rj Recommendation Y i' rF # t - tF y ~ ,-11 11 j". I t X i i'`] g -1 t e lone 5, 1996 f s l r f g , 11.11 - 1 £ G~x.,a ; a - - Page 50 F ' - Mm6 n„..y Y- .ham sys t t E t f a£ `4 f !t t - - - - - - 1 H{ 1 LL , ~ ~ , A - ~ ' , 3 f z _ .f N r }'t aS ' _ 7 L!x* y # _ - - k1 L q w E ~ ~ ~ : ~ . - , 4 ' ~L - _ r ~ . ~ , , , , " - , -1, - M i - ' - _ f r---- } ik . •-..r•a-ns•>~.~-tea. _ _ t. .t c_z_..~,~._.._.- - s 3.- ,.r.__. . _ f .d..-:-_... ~ ..J_ ~ -J _ _r, _c..~s' ~ L r'a~ 11 - r` _ txt ; - _ s =s 4Y $4 ^'n S 'S. .._.-....ut:~...brd'i'Gw_~'w'J. L^.<......au~ +.6 +'<.'+1u4, ~-I..._.°..., -..u.... i._._. v' x5 # '4 - r - -'t P d't ,t ' sk e { - i Proposed Amendments to the April 24,1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan t' , ~ . - - 3 Amendment 51 Testimony 11 ~ ,e, -k ' ' * x, , c , $ Number Page Number D , s , , t 'f FX" } j - Y j r d - { r Title -Ys Nj_ ^ - Title 6, Sxtion 4, lints 569-583 # r 4 " 6 - - - - E 2 } Gordon Faber, Mayor, City of Hillsboro r- k Proponent(s) ` "r CD n ° y at w 3ru. _ r _ - t ~ n, II - sue. - - ri 3 ? r r - It is awkward to ask the public to towers its tolerance to traffic congestion so that ' , y - ` t } Proposed 2040 concepts maybe achieved without also increasing public transit to ease some t k A t- -e 1x s ; . Amendment of thatgrcatcongestion. ~sT r ~'Z, ~ - x- As noted in other -Po-es, the inter-agency study to evaluate and revise, as . s a X; i 3~~ r . -1 .1 Staff Analysis necessary, Title 6, Section 4, will examine areas where the new standards should 1- + I ti. 1 be "targeted." These target locations am generally the higher density, mixed-use - _ { ~IK w 2040 land use types (Regional and Town Centers, Main Streets, Station Areas,Y r - etc.) have or will likely have good transit service. As important, these areas win - r- " beextremely walkable and have good bicycle access and circulation g~ { ~ - I .1 1. _-!HIFF IF,~ 11 - rYy l s§,,,v`~t C Executive Recommend no change at this time. , ' i "5 - - - r Officer ,f3 r- 11, k "r Recommendatl P on , ; r a a as ( _ { ,1fi ,4 '4. ~ o E"--' ,till $,x- t > . 6 _ i - x % ~r ay tom'' - MPAC v~ Cv C'6 [ Recommendation ' Fe t 1 F, ~ y- 1 1 'J C - 1 iIn M 'a' I, f ~M~ ° - - t s ism f `K rp- r - June 5, 1996 Page 51 i, 4 ( Mn.u xy f_ i s j .k'y 4 ,r F, h 4! - S z , h ✓ h y 't -Tyr f - 1 tr i a. - + `t ~'y..n x a ° - - .r t. r. a t yj. _ _ A I r K t - - i a f A.y i t, k r - - , ~ - - - - - , Mr,~,-~,'~1,1-1~ ~ r- , ! 1. I 1: - UZ f , , , . , , mm F - 'y~ ; G W- FP-,--R-~ "C ~1tr aid -S - B ty~'9n a~f - - r f s 5 - - r it +.-tnLS.`> `mot _ ,.r d., t 3 - ' 'i G -k „~2~'3'kt'j ~"5 - 4 - - - I~r v, - b j ~ tk~ - ,J \ -'w $tt s "9 Propoud Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan~¢ , FN Amendment 52 Testimony 22 € - a;' ~ _ ' F ~ 1,;a._.-:~ Number Page Number D 4 { F - ~ x~r Y, - -3 }y 6 45 C - y Title Title 6, Sxtion 2, lines 461 464 a - , J 2 I Jim Nicoli, May City of Tigard s- Proponent(s) ;.z A -rte m,, t -1 Revise semtence to read "...town cents designated on the Boulevard Design Map, all cities s E ~ Proposed and counties with the Metro region are hereby uir od to aliearitn lementa ' t s Amendment boulevard desi concepts as improvements are made to these facilities...- Without this r a amendment, the provision assumes that cities and counties have the ability to implement `r' r boulevard design In some cases, the boulevard may be within a city's limits and " s i a transportation plan but is under the jurisdiction of the state or county. In othercases,- y j money might not be available to implement this design and to require a city to do so would' - 4 '-i be unreasonable. The amendments recommended require that city's make whatever F _ r ' amendments to their :7~a'~~;,~~ t~~.'. ;l.., comprehensive plan and implementing ordinances that would allow z; boulevard designs to occur. k1 ' s gc-yk 4 s- ° s t This change could be made and be consistent with the title intent z t a- 4 r Staff Analysis 4,~ e ss +3 { q j?-c r, E 5 _ _ - fi F'i~ th"~ A'S1 j & f"t - M y Executive R:DfT~ d revised to rcad: "...town center designated'on the Boulevard Map, {71 , u Officerd counties within the Metro region are 5 t Recommendation huired W implement botilevsrd design concepts as improvements are - ,k rF' , 5 r' made to these facilities..." 4 g , < i MPAC f x r Recommendation r ° r - 1 JY- I fi{ I V rt r tv _ - h - aq J11 y ~f, ➢ j - 5 t r 1 t t June S. 1996 Page 52 s r . } Y C - 1 .rte - _ s z,~ t 5 - _ _ _ € F F Jy t - - .J ? ` - ' E D t t _ h fJ f r F - t - t i Vii. rs 'fit y r 1 u c a[ i _ c _ _ _ f 1k .f fi { Y, , ~ - 2, 'I ~ , , : ~ . , , - - I . . ~ , ~ L I _I, , , ~ - . , : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ 91 ~ I - I L , ~ ' ' - ; f f r F i r -;7 I - F - ♦ - - ,i:._i_. 1_:. _-5-u i-';; t, _ r -.1- _ ~:;rt. -r11 '''i - 3 1' _ - - - _ _ - _ 4 t"42- - x _ i _ y fi - - - - _ _ 4 iju M Y:51r4' 'A A _ cs M i - i i£y 'wi`• y t - - - - k - S ,R sy-0 3 fi 9 a # s £ z `E - : roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Grout Qt Managanrnt Functional Plan S h . ' - i , tea 1 { a s ' Amendment 53 Testimony 65 - " 1 ' r Number Page Number H - ' F'r 1 1 .f c _ _-y _ i a h a, i u Y}, i Title Title 6, Section 3, lines 501-502 and 520-522 i - . t.... r 9 -„Y k Fr? Y y K A Friends ofAmoldCreek -v n- Proponent(s),,_ {l y - - F ds- 2SJ 1yS1a Revisc criterion tti iaciude an exclusion for streets with covironmmiai consaeiuu. : ( . _ Proposed In Southwest Portland, requiring cul-de-sacs to beao longer than 200 feet and E t ~ i ° Z' 'r V 7 Amendment • Ile serving no more than 25 units would make many lots unbttildable because of ~x W - existing environmental constraints. It is preferable to build more lots on cul-de• egg'' ` " g`r s Tf s sacs within the UGB while leaving stream corridors intact rather than build more x s y f 5 n r x lots outside the UGB, or crossing streams to provide connectivity. ~ 's' } - R h` --0 'sp 11 r ~•.g~'£F} zz- Title 6, Section 3, lines 513-515 already provides for the waiver of culde-sac as -'i Staff Analysis designs and closed stmt systems limitation is areas with topographic and ' t ! ,r environmental constraints. Title 7, Section 2 contains exemption criteria and r - E s procedures where a local jurisdiction can show that "a street system or connection " , 0 is not feasible for reasons of topographic constraints or natural or built ~ ' -er g environmental considerations." - r- -1- k isl r y i• L,` 4 - - . 1 4. t 2 v^a - cE. f - t Executive Believe already addressed Recommend no ehangeto existing text g ?r t - a , z lr j Officer 1 Recommendation f'-` f is e - r _ t- - r - - 3 f - " - s~?~ i --b xx a J ` Recommendation ~ x - C . T' " v` . t - is Y fEFFF Gti t 'I v . s u#' L ao „z i~~ ~ L k §F _ - ` r rx , 1 - _ '.e Fky d 24 „ June 5, 1996 Page 53 'k ' r ' ri "d a 3 ~1x ° f - - ""r.., ,t , ---L, -1 I -1-L - ~ = ,d'- E 4' w,-i'fi't. :;C<. ~.Hp'.F _ ,.^°;~m-'~" - ~5 I , , ~ I i - . ~ ~ , , 77,7-wf f ; , ~ Y ~l Td, I{ 1 y f - - - j wr 4t { 9 ' j - 4 - - _ J- N _v 13 R- ,g_ _ C a - i ti; nr - - - z _ G' m 7 - d L _ . , - r :61F, Y I ~ I ':4 ~'.i I ~ ~ , - - is I y iS , S°^°°i`x" £s.. - , it, a s t 1 C1- t4 ~f N' roposcd Amrndmrnts to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Managemrnt Functional Plan , r t t ,a,s , x - 1 Amendment ff Testimony 86 ~Y yc j Number Page Number F €T Title i i° '.1 - Title 6, Section 3, lines 482-522 { w_ s , # _ _ '_f l - g rr _ -1 ` Jon Chandler, Home Proponent(s) Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland ( ? i 11 1 , F a- I -'lz~-;i"-'~ -~'L~- -~i'~Q-'-'-.'.- ~ Metro's standards in this section should parallel TPR regtriremwts, not exceed I "I ; n . v- - Proposed _ Amendment them (e.g., limitations on cul de-sacs, minimum street spacing the ttirement to y} t t r~ providt public right of-way routes). P'.' Sent lanwa_oe _n the 5metinnal ptan exceeds what LCDC requires. - r F " u: i 1 z~ n"4~'u.J`dye Y t - a - ? ~ , ~ s x, C rr -f1.. d?3' The street I , "lion s acin re tr r - ~Y ' ~ Staff Analysis P g quirements and limitations on cul-de-sac designs x , P comply with the RUGGO requiremInt of 8 to 20 local ~ t :r 5~%.,, through streets per mile. t -4, 1 .-M- r The RUGGOs identify increased street connectivity as being necessary toimprove - ~ } the operation of arterial street network Improved pedestrian nerd bicycle t c F ~,M~ w*' - comwdons are important to implementation of the 2040 Growth Concept and are f it - - - f max, 9 I I [ I 1: ~7L -1 also identified in the RUGGOs. The RUGGOs were revised in December 1995 4•= z `r, ~ : and reflect adopted regional policy, _ r,:y`r r~ ,v, b'; -,c ''r . v "I , x;q~t ,E ~ k Executive Recommend no change to existing text { § { , k 51 Officer a a g a V'5 Recommendation U r I 3 s„ Recommendation ' i 4 r i C 4 x. C 3t 1 - i #e 4 i- - . -1 -''ti - C -2 - w H ( a t - - t t x°'Sr 'i, v s` 3rd ' 'aG, ` _ June 5 1996 - f Page 54 ' i' ' ~j,-~ I ' a„ r~ -3 4 7 ' ~ t - _ i . lrt r a - _ _ F ?ra-k t t t J s ,1 - \ - f t ^i uu ~5l,. r - it I }``3 5 t-- } ~iyI' Y < 1 - - F -k f 1~ r . ~'.:~.._rw.-.,~.~...: _t. :pis _ v -.,t ..;.i.,S~_. ~ _7_.••r_~~ ~._e~ I , ~ Q, , - , - - . , ~ 1~, - I - - , - - - ~ - , ~ , ~ - ,2~,,,,~-,,,-,,~:-;, --,,~,e~,-~ RA - C~v r , t q} ~ 1 4 7 r - - j ~i r err ,A 3 - _ t M-~ --~c Ys r 2,'e~ t ' - ; Sey } PA's v '4[ f ' 'tl a" -S -t~°'-' '*asa tis3t,.u aav _ y 4 ' R - 11 { ty~ _ y4.4 P 3 _rE} z~Y z a ' Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan a - j _ s r R IT - - -f' a _ 4 x Dar k ,asp k - _ k „ - 'a~ i kw, Kt S 4 ; Amendment 55 Testimony 86 r ' - Number Page Number r - r Y - 4 1 r - F - S r Title Title 6, Section 3, lines 510-12~ t.... - ,4 _ _ _ Jon Chandler, Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland "4 cr - Proponent(s) rr za -n-4x ° FqFg i F. a pct---'' -h~"* , Requiring narrow pavement widths is good, but does not accomplish much from a`1 9~c # a , Proposed land use perspective unless right-of-way width is likewise curtailed The Amendment functional elan should tW~t dye _ - t of nghiroi-w ay that can be required - . , - , - , , F Y< 3 as c~ w S~?'t' -a 5 ~a 13f~+'~'l 2Y?F k; t . If, Staff Analysis Bpedestrian facilities can be maintained, right ofwa 1111-- y r ytatabe redutxxl J ,,3- Ir - r-'fi- .1may, s* - - , jr } - _ { - -t"1 , ~3~:~,,,,,; i,,~ ~ " I 1 i -.,i:,,~- Executive Revise Title 6, Section 3, lines 510-512 to read 'eomsid4 amrawstreet psi alternatives r 4' ~s Z ...,.n..,....,,,,.. e e,.> o-rr !TA n s a { Officer that feature mta7 is k ¢y afomo x Pavement widths ofno f , - `r`, a ; Recommendation more than 28 feet curb -face to curb fax, sidewalk widths of at least 5 feet and Inndseaped ~ C', g'" _ I i _ pedestrian buffer strips that include street trees and. " X: - 11 k ,:i a - r a Recommendation a a EES 71 1 Ike z7 ~t,anag - rI v r- a t3 s ,Y f r g t June 5. 1996 4 t Page 55 ,I' - _m a 4 r$- Mn11O St <'Yr r r k -.r rks r u k- t a. n a Zip s , ^ r t .r«..,„ •a k - 1r - T' - - - - P = ' _ i } _ _ a . 3 W' r x S I - - { j J t t { t d r MS 1 hW - 1 fi } [{E/ S T T E 9t i -'f1 & P s F Y{F SSW x- ; ; - - t , tK_..Yx } .h - - a 1 - _y,7 1 _ _ - > 7 ~ 7 ~_l_.~_, _I_3 y-_ z._.S-.55 ~ 9~,€ 3fi f fi, -t _ -r,,,~ t t t gis 12 tee. y„r - ' T r..s 5 3~•,+~+.t' ng i Y . Y 3 3 - .aa.:avwp f _ maZ -a " ~'r - ar _ _I s v - , k i --~r,'s; a- S.~"ft"tx-l - v ( - Id4 h tltt-' }M r'_: rz y,a yv- s~u:^.. - 5. 9 " ^M v v V 0J'%7,'..- - cif - . _ t (5 r t,'t --i1- 8^ F t+ 3 - ' :fit 4 4 'rl - z$ r s > >F Proposed Amrnrlmrnts to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan s ,x- Y 7 V t Y rte[ - S, r~ Amendment 36 Testimony $y 1 :4r 1 x" t Number Page Number t. T g' ~ Title Title 6, Section 4, lines 568-583 i ` , " ~ f : t ' 3 ~g`v C 7C r? S > y - 5 - Jon Chandler, Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland ' Proponent(s) `s` *4 ttt~ ~E}Y fi The "actions" that shall be applied prior to recommending a significant capacity ; „ ' ems'. , 11 ry,ns r } ? Proposed expansion io a regional facility are not defined clearly enough. ' a - Amendments ~'U r v L 1-2- s ~ a , ~ v ? sir , 1 ; . y _ M." dcrcl the o owmp, mi.d tang-pew hop 3 thrmgy Sa3. The putpwc the tevw® V ~fi , ~..1- '3a- i u- 4 StaHAnalysis is tobeaeraddrmStateTPR(12)Seaion66012-060. + g~~ 4 j r. T. address level otServioe: - h* . vt i i -1 - ; _ Corridor ar site-lerclfnnmanation demandmwcemmttetlmiwes ~n~,°•r1 ~ t- Additiotul rcudwav «paeitvm parallel faa70ies, ineNd'me the wtaideratim of. eid uaantt l- '~:,y r t - eotaistent with mrvfecti itv aanduds ooMained in Title 6. Sat ion ofthis plan v-,. - ,r,'W •f,'„~ x q r - • TransitbHVi0[ hrtttmatettllomarase ridership s t,.t~*'.,' rt' t I d' 9 a _ y 2. To addrta of oraerve rtroe! function: t M" g t~,~~~ s i F • Tnff~e tahnine r # So-et function daasification K. - J E 3. To address or preserve adAina sVM ansMV v"' z.. q'i _ • Tramportatim maroeen'M fee. mom m marctnettt siaiij inleries. lane ehvtelivtionl P, r ' 'x' y~, ~ r Argrftheahoveem Acrau=dotwadc*mWy"oaat effvmwty'd&=tmpmblem,-mgopaczW •y. ~.E. 3:•- ,t y '._L i r - - mtpovemesrta E be included in the amprebaaiw plan. n ¢ Executive Recommend above language be adopted. rc f Officer era 1 j Recommendation t;; t~ F -F W f 1:~' f Y - -e^Y I MPAC i 0~x k - Recommendation ' ? x ; gz - Z fit', r ,t i } 7 1$ p Z 3 4 f "t k ' C st t i i 4 - i iJ - -G.._ 1 n AVi, ~ lure 5, 1996 '3 .eta - xr } Page 56 wa„a k 4 j _ ^:^.b .S~ aC'',4iv_sie3c':~tL: °TXT; °+::~,,^'N2 raT~ xevn-+,:5ts~wY ^7"°". - YY h' ~ i _d Li` _ r - - - a -t x ,at 7 - >a E g 4. b - S- 1 _ t i i ) s t P 4 -y _ _ _ 3`--_ yy i t-67 t t i4 K tt 14" . P~ F'i~k C C t. 4. \ k _ , Y Y -'3ii i i2 d- - :s - 54•S t Y 1 6l ''1`y 1 : ' - - ~ - I I W : , , , r 'r.",", . , _ L, ~ --_I , M r r{r{w S ~ y. L _ . t • . - . r~---~ti ~'~'7'i ,-ac~~ _ 1 L i . •.,.v _ r ._._!._._a_~~L_a_v - y FyF Xra^ w k S :i- F-PeFF a k '.~fi - .r'a i,'~. r"rn -fit„ r - - _ S f- J awl s k s - t r s "r' spy - t '.-......:.~...::r.....__...~. .,,,r-a, ......;:s,.:c-'., c~.o.....~......:~ ~ssr.- .-.I-- f { - ~3ai- - .sec ,t' t '-q ^tY- _ 4 a i ~ r r - ' - ' x Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan ~S a s x rtk fi t z r, €a a Amendment 57 Testimony El S F 4 , Number Page Number t " $ - -dam Je Title Tide 6, Section 3, lines 482-522 r f y Robert Lefebcr, MaYbourne Real Estate r s `-'k r ~ Proponent(s) ~.p~ 4r q-'d -y~ .X -1M1. ' The street, bicycle and pedestrians connections standards should not be based on k _ Proposed minimum spacing requirements. Rather thr.;na: d al connections of a particular 'ik~' ' `s Amendment pr ject should be made based on the surrounding circumstances. In addition, W x af~- r gridding parking lots with streets and walkways serve to decrease shopping > F' ' ~ , Ill between retailers and have the effect of separating store customers fr om puking. ar ~ "'q 4 L° * 7 S t k~YL'-m"x$ 1 1 41. _ t t ,d 2}Is r t ~E 1 t t The maximum rte' ' 2 r^ Staff Anal sis spacing requirements for pedestrian and bicycle connections are I y needed to ensure that new development provides for reasonably direct pedestrian ` w 5 - and bicycle travel between developments, adjacent streets and transit as required n€ ( t ° - a by the Ttathsportation Planning Rule. In order to encourage more we and a bicycling, out-of-direction travel and trip lengths need to be minimized, Providing ` ~A estrian access through P~ Parking lots is a Transportation Planning Rule (1PR)' ,s 4 r _ 34' requirement of local plans to make it safer and more pleasant for people to wall: to F r stores from adjacent transit stops, stores and other developments, reducing the ' ~ - need for some automobile trips. - z ,ii £ y, f 7 Executive4 Recommend no change to existing text r a Officer ~ r3 I Recommendation ~ ~ e' Y 't~ 5 fc9 !y _ E S t - ti - , 'E+ 4 MPAC ~ " Recommendation "uy -;4i s a 3A F r~ } # J I r ; - - , Cb _ 4 F { y ) k June 5,1996 a 4'z { Page 57 s y _ k"4 - 4nwo Ii. 1 1 .'r, F s t~F4 i _ ~ 1: ~ a 5a w K r t d k i / Y- 12 _ _ _ f- Vt~ t _ r 3 a~ - , - - i : , , i ~ . I , ~ - - ~ ~ ~ I 'T~ , "~'T~; , ~ --~~i i.+, }4 - A T - y { h - S t # _ { t ' - I - ~"r _ L ` vY 1`__- . s~ . - _ t.r_ ..4 _ w _ v, -_.r.. `i . - t_.. z._t r _.__ay_., s -.1. - - . , . v , - t _ i v ft~ - ~ff ',',,,~~-,,,~'~~,:'~,'-"'~.--T-~I ,;i--' -,i'~,~-~T ~ - . I I - - , M I 2 i g-,-O Q ej 3 _ 3. v .f' fit, if ''S! 1, L x P.r.,32 a t-:l~"~r°t;Lic_,.. 11 ^x'±14`°- :M°i:..-„3`'-:~~-,.°`s~•~+.y~;rySiC'tit:T <6tis.': ~ a roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan ,--m fi- r t ;x -y x _ Amendment 58 Testimony 126 , l Number Page Number c k , O' s u J 4 tshY`rj ,f _S 'st 't-.u } R $ ~ Title Title 6, Section 1, lines 445-458 _ s• { P { 4, ,tb ?gyph ® s tom` tr -,-r Judy Skinner ; Proponent(s) E k}.,. } € K.,- - - ii - 4 h 3i yi 'tts - - 1 ,7 ~ t W The street classifications should be unique and should not include boulevard, ` & Y } VV, i' „ x _ Proposed drive, road or other descriptions that are commonly used iQSUxt names. ~ 2 -c s - r _ Amendment 4iy i fiL.~,a' a grp f _s5 3 ti~G+ t tj7~t s~ < I . Consistent with terms used for the 2040 Growth Concept (such as "Main Street" ti j T `M a ~`5-r•~ - emu Staff Analysis and "Town Center'), the street design classifications are de5ned [[sing common o"+ - ~ ,g terminology. It is Metro's intent that technical terms be avoided and that common a - "J f words that are readily understandable by the public be used instead l. k f k n~ 4?~ tit 1; - 5 r k l v, € v sKV~ _ t Executive No change recommended t ) ~ t t > 4 Officer # I ~ ~C~ a ' r Recommendation t £ { § a> . a. i - t ax f E' i s f E- 19,~, t Nye Recommendation } yl ` 3'* G ~ h, - - - '4 P yak ,.,x iI -max., t f~ ➢ a r `rt -5 F i _ . -.g - - - I x xd~7 w - " June 5 1996 ~ " k' * 2 x r r Page 58 ~y 'a.-.-..,"'..,.^^°°"F...""'°'^"'^M...^^•'°• ~ w ,c ,n :e~s -.:~.-S, .,e~se~a+vva?nww t " n c T S 'Y 3H„ P' 5 - _ S - -'t-'y ~ ~ 1.~ ' r r - :7,:-;~-~ ~ L ~ I ~ ' ,,r, ~ - - ~ " ~ , _ " ~ Z _ 7,- r _,I" _ - - ~ , " I ' I I ' - - I I - ~ ~ I " _ . j 1. t y k dtFd- _ i T T Yi ? J -A _ 3 L f E c`. 'F i' k T z. * ,LL a t 1 4 S _ '^r F k 7 ..--dos. _ - Haan ~ r r'~ w r -2- , - $ # - - _ 'T a -:.:a.,tz.Naa,.s - _ mc,' -';rs.v» ' < t,~~ 4 r-f5 1. -1 ham' F . t sP - - i44 t lYc ~ ~ ~ ti to ~ c ~ ggp- e -t ,k hetgg~ 11 ~roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Fwctional Plan r : r +?,E tf s ? , ~ _ Amendment 59 Testimony 130 , , r , ~ rs3 t Number Page Number - F x t s s v r rx q- a_ ' gat - ~ $ --i , _ r (D - I 7~,~,; > _ Title Title 6, Section 3, lines 482-538 u sj E4" 4` . 1 h~ _ -1, x - - ltObl~fel:e,MaVn_r !`;~_....f$;,,,-.•c:wn - ` Proponent(s) ' ,t ~ MF- b Application of connectivity ttgtttrements' M, "'~a r f V :r Proposed r - ,t, .~t :f F to r - .r Amendment F - M 4 $ , k J M;y -t 1 f", K° ~ a : Staff Analysis poposed connectivity standards would apply to both developing ar ens and , 4- ass~~ developed areas where infill or redevelopment is occurring on vacant lead areas of 5 acres or greater. The intent of this station is to improve conntxtiviry whenever fill x , - r, :I I . 11 11 possible through the local development review process. These standards are n< divided into "design" and petformaace^ options (one requirement, the future " ' . ~ r x strut plan provision online 516 of the °design^ option would only apply to sites is t , offve acres or larger). The ° p p performance" o lion is intended to rovide the local * flexibility that is proposed in this commwt N- I!M~`§' } =z # ) J i - Vito- ' ay}}y- _ x Executive As this is for vacant lands larger than 5 acaes,zecemtmtxid no' change ° Ty Officer } ° mss' t Recommendation r'. " ..4,,,, t i E e{ 4 _ fi MPAC ,I n,y Recommendation r _ r~ ,r z ~t '1' F Y _ 1, x fie r ~,n f r, Page 59 y ' 3 R f k - YRRO r iY i r x r r Y f k?3 f f ~i x k'"8X .ca:.c "<.{c`'r ..--e"' ,mot _ _ _ t _ 'f''~- _ 'I 5 b, i LZ"s D - - - i 3-- 1v 9" ] ..i { S vY. - x _ - - {f s . a ' kk'L J,ry t f,e E- Y Cf' - t "T - - - 4 { - 1 7 - f i J,. 3 ` 1 S -.f < Y - - ! . 1ik$ - _ , YY J i 4 A q W E .S.i.c-. . ...vt.r_v: ~,_.,f~.,':,:_, ~.v z.~._ ,x. ]L:- ...r.._ __s .t v.. .v - L.I ..v ...5 __.._.____t.. ~_..f~ zr 1 s.`. :ti.~.i,__•~ s x snr ` y W ~"L r ,.ai-_ _ .s.. _ ~ a'~', - 6AR y - it r gF ,M 1»~ fTz?. `,'j - I x i s ~z ~ { t a . zz s e ter,, . ~ I'M I i s<~`~,° Y { ~ reposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan v a a~ ~ a ~ c r' lx xr s F deL l t ` Amendment 60 Testimony 130 1r "~,I gf a ` k- Number b-_ Page Number r 4 -AISI- -1 r , ' ' ' Title Title 6, Section 4, lines 539-583, LOS Standards - - .1. '111"Zi di 11-. s 1 d~G 1`i1 ?2W b .7 x" Rob Drake, Mavor, City of Beaverton d N" ~ g` Proponent(s) W ` dt'` (a) Local road congestion standards i i, ~ R; NIP Proposed "xa Amendment (b) Application of LOS standards by land use type r 4 i,, g b r _ Y S - L A- f I, r, _ t_ eg K, ~ ' e Jtx~pxa (a). The proposed level of service standards in Section 4 of Title 6 would apply to the 4 o T Staff Analysis regional network However, the connectivity Provisions in Section 3 of Title 6 are" r - r intended to support the level-of-service standards by serving more local trips on local G - r streets, with fewer local trips on the regional system r. 2. y ! ~ ~ _ (b). The Proposed LOS standards are still being refined for the functional plan and may , t ty w 0-F 11 I L, A5-:; l become more reflective of land use districts However,,rtcw?.OS standards are also being a q "r r F`r - developed as part of the system component of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) ' ° i~ update, and these standards are likely to be tailored to more localized areas, and based sT k more closely on tend use designations. S o ~ @ ` Y - l r 1' ! 4- - Executive Recommend no change to existing texL s -r, o rg t 1 Officer k , r2,4} T-A ~c t Recommendation a t - s t , hk y tr gn ' fir _ .1 C _ I il,' y MPAC ? a$o - 'i~ ~~rr 1 - i Recommendation - y , - e - .11 ~-~~-.,,~'?~~r',,~,,,~r~~,,-.---'r~,,~~~~,",~~,_4,,"- - "j,-~,"--~-r-,L*' - ~ r, L 1- I. 'i - - u p A - Y - - t ?~~,,~~-',.',--i~:~ ~ ~V,~,~,~,-~, ~~4 i~~, ~~~,.~'~~,~";"~:~',,--'.~-1.~l'~, ~'~~,~'~Q ~ ~ 9' - i ~11L-,~-- Y.,. - - 5p {.Nth { June 5, 1996 ! k { t ~ Page 60 t i (11' w- itua S L T Y - t'e.ruatr F{ p*11 1,~. ttt 1 k f, - ` L k e #ta ~r 5, 4 }r - - }-d'~'~ 1 ..,jr t E- pit; Ys r a e m -t T { a j ,x x i S - - - - t Iz std,+~. ,,<,Z • ~,c - - _ - c'k - - - - - - - r 3+ L tz° '3,..~' 3 5#°•3,x.5 L~ X J, V S -i r- b k + - r.<-t` 'S t'• ht3 Sf ; A' t - i - j x i j si t - Fy A Y'~ ~.,...~•_-.tea a _ 5 `'h~il`S} e` x++. , Y S+ , FFt -NI EZWfy, WA, f' rx- _ - - ? y^ C3M'fl y,~ j ~,'i, a % r Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan >°Y rv u~ F i Y Y ~ Amendment 61 Testimony 130 . le, s 3 Number Page Number z k 7s,_ h. b IR' ' 'Q~~ Title Issue not part of Urban Growth Management Functional Plan a~ A'K - " r' z X . 11-6 :,x r n- s , Rob Drake, Mayor, City of Beaverton _ Proponent(s) ' E' 't - x~ t+s~fi u A k 1 -r .~'~3. d 3 Drop Tigard extension station area designations .Tp Proposed -in Amendment a P F YYg ^a^;hyS''%ti y, t 3 T,~ - - ~ - .Yt EL While a light rail extension to Washin on Square and Tigard is a long-term 1 ',l - 0-- 8m P r f Staff Analysis the intent of the station area designation is to bcgin•developing transit-oriented t x , communities that will eveatusUy be served with light rail. Over time, other high-m k y capacity transit, such as busways or Fastlink bus service, may be used to phase in £ ' x r an eventual light rail extension. In addition, no growth allocations were made to . - , these station areas. ~a- ' c. , aL F 5 a~i Fit -WIC, 11 j yi t ,S i F e3 F Executive Recommend no change. "X " ` 11- 1E I ' . YS , Recommendation P 5 # F MPAC } , g c t €n Recommendation _ aZ3 r f ~ "x~- -1 11 2 F rr - j d ` 3~ It. y,T ,44 . L y y e Va June 5. 1946 - -sue'u` r f54 r. ~ ? o- H r a Page 61 r Mn~o Sr ~r''O j h t-4 A'r, YY ~ }kS t F 4 "ty _ r !~.T+Y~s.?s."'+1.'r ••TT' ' -7 - R~4` V+c" L'daT..isM-a...r+...>-.+-- x-..,mv.d. `Z 1 i'# - 'ter - x' 7' ✓ _ 1 - _ V 1' 4 -Y, - - - - 3' ft'- 2 _ '1 # ' } U-1 & - . . . , - -1 , , L ` e" - El I , g-,,,~ 1, is & .-gr~5.x' 3 c F ; d a V x I - ' r ,,s r 1 = i C..Ar, - a ,t - - - - 1 -i h,~ 9 f i `~r.Y - F'- - C t . F_ r i q I d 60 NZ, VZ~ h x K6~ yr `tom h { ~WtSgz Troposed Amendments to the W ='ti , 0.:3 Y April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan t;- = L t*'S•'.< rte: x y Amendment 62 Testimony 130 r < ti Number n Pane Number ta fi fps -'si . s ,i etc 3 ~„sE FE- Title Issue not part of Urban Growth Management Functional Plan 1 `ys -:Z r Rob Drake, Mayor, City of Beaverton, ,w i Proponent(s) ~e ae +.~hs4 y l r' C s Transit/fav share allocation Y Proposed" Amendment AD- z~. Ras w i'e t ~fi z R"- x Long-tesrn regional transit service improvements are defined in the Regional # x T xr K a Staff Analysis Transportation Plan OM). During the neat several months, the transitsystem element of the RTP will be updated to better reflect the 2040 Growth Concept, and guide Tri-Met in development of the future system. 1 k r } R7-- T p y P _ .5 dtt F l Executive As an alternative, explore local based transit operations inspecif sub•regiotss..- Officer fij s Recommendation r' 1 ,y 'L MPAC Recommendation n t ✓ _ y, h try ' JWCS. 1996 Page 62 i fsia s _ x k t ¢ 777 _ r - _ A 13 } - t ?I ~5J pk _ J-. - yM" -JV II F~ s - -3 r ~h s 77- tu-"Ximps, t ~ rat , , ~i,-,qj,%,~ , I - - ,I; ~ ~ I I -11, " " , , , z 3 n _ - Y- s _ 14 >-r- ,ia 's;.,a k re-f € r - 1 5. _ {i" ® _ 2 - # ~'g , „~'~w.,a ,~'sz f r. ?5 3.~,~ r y 1 alts r T 1 - S ~.ff-S~'i$..'43--`.t~` T- ke { - - h,- 5' e. i y. ~.a;*°+k~~tx s. _._..-...,rte a S..'--r- y~ I,-,- _ c , ,4 r A _ r" r x + =r t -a,~'~ uE, I' ,ate' ,t h n : Proposed Amendmcnts'to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan ~ ~~1 ~ ` Y 1004 1 ;75 t~ b - r Y t c_, ` '*,TSeri s3 a 0 Amendment 7 t'~ nt Testimony 63 !0 x w t ,r ,x- r Number Page Number C ; , 9z ~ ry ~ _ ` - Title Title 6 -General @ ` ' , "tom ' t, _ , Gordon Faber, Mayor, City of Hillsboro .t ~ ~ Y - i Proponent(s) t -s ~c-.- fM 3 Y t f M, It .le a`-,e~ 10" (a) Title 6 should prescribe a major, immediate role for public transit in _ ' ! E , Pro osed t s ~1 P im lementin 2040 land use strate es in Hillsboro. " ',`sr Amendment p g gi - S 5 r (b) Hillsboro does not support detailed design standards for roadways. a - F T k ~0. X ''6i LF t ktr'`:Yi. a .f "..w - - 4- - „`mil ' I _ 'ZN to tx '1`3~C•t~^v" .d ' K,r...'~.-. - $ ' f , ~ i Staff Analysis (a) Title 6 addresses this concern in part, by increasing transit and pedestrian r'~: s design emphasis in planned regional centers (like Hillsboro) and outer , concentrated activity centers (lines 455-458 and litres 466-468). The Regional • r~~ x~ r 4 - Transportation Plan will provide a more detailed plan for improving transit service r~3-,~ j £ f' y t0 these 8rea5. r s~,.:+• ~3''z. rt 34 ~ t (b) The functional plan does not provide "detailed" standards for jurisdictions to "w x -'w s follow. The plan just require that these type of design treatments be k _ s incorporated. tis' RN , r r ' , ~ - _ r - r _ s {3-'-fir` - V k*a x'a t - Executive v ~ t Officer Recommend no change in existing text ~ - - " r fF Recommendation t . " { t ` ' 4:. li r ' MPAC r t { Recommendation r` , kk f, , ~ a t , s x ti C + P EEf r ~x f r - { s- s 9 y C. ! f" J 1 [ - f t -f~rf d --E- _ bane 1996 4- r{'i Tza~axAS, ~,I ° , Page 63 , c Y I r Y F A , CM r' 1 ri kf r 1'°~.'"--°- - 'a xfc s -c r;... a'E, ,.fix ^"°'c °r'•."` - y'- - r r, -e k -.r z.y ar ax { j _ _ - t,~ k_ -VF r wz ) ' Ya ~%,~,~~",3, U 14 n~ , , , , - . ~ 2J t 2 sr , fir J - < - F F `yd` - - ~ , - , , , ~ , , ~ r ~ 7--'~ " " , - 21 "r ~ r ' - 7 ; .k , - t - - a - w - -I - , I , ~ , , - ! I : , ~ t --•+~f.n~..._- -~.~-n Svc`- "'"'"_~T^ ~ -~V.. i, - ^"p-P cl~ 1'Crl9~iT , . ~,-Y~~.Y .Y_L _ _ ts_ _ .i ,...--._i s e..~_- .Iw`~ ~l..s•L .~»J.. .s.! _ ,aY 1 ..v~.. i.{_.. e... ~ v- t`u.__ 1 .._L - ~'c,~ - d - -:VOR 1--Ii~110 -,~Ihlll'~;", - % ~ M . ri-,#,.~,.,,n+,,..d 5 - - - - s s pv if xP g, n +.,c vL,' i s s - . u~.".w._., ' F Yt - wry t F~~' - " i•RY i u"" i 5-- - 3 2 4g, e k f-, P roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan s , r , - a t z ~ Y , m 4 4 Amendment 64 Testimony 83 ' ; Number Page Number F s a D ~."f - } s - - ) Title Title 6 - Section 2 and Section 3 t , - t ` Jim Hitrzdel and Associates r h A e x Z Proponent(s) ( , 2 ~ ~ s ; x i - } t a § x s x , ' The addition of language to these sections that exphcitly states that the standards as a ^ , - Proposed outlined in section 2, Boulevard Design and section 3, Design Standards for 1 - r x~fi ~ t e { Amendment " tx Connectivity, do not apply to state highways in areas which are primarily s : K residential (e.g., Highway 43 through Dunthorpc, southeastern Lake Oswego and a' a West Linn). In addition, the functional plan should indicate that capacity and y _ '-iV ,ter, `c t ri safety for all forms of traffic, including buses, bicyclists and pedestrians, is of ' u w'x~- primary importance. t - a xv - '.I _ ~~i l'} 9n ~ ~S p i$'raF' F 3 4 _ 1. ,a $ No change recommended. In the 2040 Growth Concept, the central city, regional r ~ 'aj ~ , n Stall Analysis centers, station communities, main streets and town centers-are planned for dense f , r, ,5~ development with a mix of uses and frequent transit service. These areas will k t r " t, a attract significant pedestrian activity, and will require improved pedestrian , t ~ < ZY~y, tp, pp . G f y walk-ways, crossings and other amenities needed by pedestrians. Street designs # a x I....?-, ~ ; . and networks to these areas must give priority to pedestrians and transit, but will - z-V :x still accommodate other modes. The intent of the boulevard provisions is to begin - I ~ 3 P t phasing in these design features in the most concentrated areas of development i ~ ~9~ ~ They are not recommended to apply to "corridors" at this time. 1;~ r w . ' " IV -Executive Boulevards need not be 5 lane facilities, and local designs and plans are important 4 , as Officer Recommend no change to text, but that RTP and other Metro documents reflect i - e , t c Recommendation that boulevards need not be a minimum of 5 lanes. r u , , t r s 1 x I + r MPAC I } Recommendation " y b f i ,h6r,k . "'iZ,M~ , ~ , ~ L " ~ [ , _I y r e t z~ r S J t t I 11 1-1~ t June 5 1996 , ~ 4 -,~{?x a °3 r Page - wn~o k r y { 1 * N - - - j iv 1 < - -r" K - 'g T '_l ,c~ ~ - - = r - - a - h mt ¢ _ .s 4r 1Z - 11 -1~ h?^ } L , ~ , I ~ I ~ A } - -,s - .a r _.L..._~ a r 1 + f ...z - _ t t M1 d -6'- - l'r r - - } Y -•----I:-° T ~m-~- _.^-~-P-~--n:s Tc a--'""~-a--•-••--•--,--,..-.-r"~"` ~~f i s uY s r , tom. _ zx - - t -gg M ref - - a' 1i R ' a , 5Q 111- : Y. 1 4 b_,._.,a _ c t i - r, . n - 'f s - - n - s3 .parr 11 6$m~,;` . '-z- as _ Y,5, 3:c •,c r"Pdrv i x:i-' .,.._.t, -"s.. 1 , %11 ~a t Z2 I NO I - ` ~roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan R _ r # a- r - - ,s fir` I L a -.z... r Amendment 3 r r * Number Page Number r ,pg - - 3, 9- _ Title Title?-lute 588 Y ^ v,rI - ~ k - , i s-r~- t i x _ ip`ti~ x a x fr - - , 4 i Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard t _ Proponent(s) I $ . - f.'€''a'y rys ti T Proposed ,,,functional plan within twenty-fora months of the effective date of this ordinance s', ~ ~ , k t Amendment once etnents utcludal ui this docitiualtliaye f?ea~~ala11 - pttzl lryrn;tiimc: s 11 t r s - r --a i.- 1 r5 .V ~C { ,t , k The intent of this functional plan is to eacotttage early implementation of the < 4 s k Staff Analysis Metro 2040 Growth Concept In title 3, there at,. model ordinances to be - 5 completed after adoption of the functional plan. If this proposal is made a part of D k the functional plan, early implementation would not be likely. ggq fi" x {r , . st tiL F~ c 'r ~ ~ 1 r Executive Recommend no change to existing text . a - b t, ` Officer WK - 'r r 21 Recommendation a 14 tr I I € we A ,P", 'ate r " r tNPAC r - t-s -}cwt' 1 Recommendation C - x'; #t ,Mt ,0 w - - T F ,-rv- .--errf 3-~ - x4s - x r t r ~f, As a,Y4 - - P 4 Y x i tt~ y iG 1-' "p c T -I x June 5. 1996 Page 65 i ~y 1 d € #uar M-6 s. k - >n - s ~sF % u, e.se-q+C. - w -..sF,q• , - f _ 1 Pxh t - y k - { } s xt x d .,.tar it - - ~j, q'-W,-;,,.',_L,-~l - - - ' - ~ I 3 _,y,~,~,~,~,,, - L" " L I ~ i, , , ~ , _ , ~ , I ~~L - ~ , . , - ' ' ' - ' . " ~ , ,~k, ~ I .-V t i- y , d 3t.1. C - _ - v L ,y `r~^.-,--~. ,f 5 4 j t~~' .b- 5''S - T`L^^^ r, =Lei. yµ~n 11 die' b - ",r _ -v- j-7^ -~r-- - r r y3' k f r l =.y - 1 1 1 r . .11 F - ".g"""am-ri' .-w~cr•-~-~• -fw- _ _ - _ _ ~.3 3 P Y ti - r:F s- 4 } •a,- d - c f s . .'x Jr- $ L ~3 MI. `_-,~,=!,1~_1_____ ~ I-- I - - - , , - - , - , ~ I. " ~ ~ I , -1 ~ C.'~,'~Z tt",,i-~~*,.,~, J,w-N,~Foi't~ , :£JT~d'+. z "'^JiPy' ?4 ~ ` 4~ p' _ _ - _ _ _y r L. )L . xZ fy .a ,l~iy as - - - L '-,.,r'> - 'F~Y - Tt - - . - e- ,2 3 yr- f--*f~=5 i- .w AF, - .3w " as#' '`car ~,W A 6 ti A i Y~ } ? f 14t roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Managemrnt Functional Plan tai t , X Amendment 66 Testimony 22 i? - ! Number Page Number l : , x 1 ,.:gyp 3- Lt•°~? - i=}~"rr Title .a f t w S,g ~ Title 7 -line 601 + + b ' . r r s .a rm - a - t k _ t , A TM""... . c d Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard r r d, ` Proponent(s) s z 11 1, a- N i Fy ° f i Proposed Line 601 (additional language): Vletitiiv li"giptti tun Tpac~aipij;la _ . ' Amendment td t - -i tGClit!}Ca18TId1S5lS 7C1j111rK1 it1(;~hCSetWAS: 1 7- - - s ~r .3 ""~w a i x A Y kyxW ryk-3,FT,"r _~J~~ F- x - 97z"-k +c~A' Y•'s-jy`c`.'.~st`~}iaFv"k i a - Similar to an additional proposal, this has Metro bud g implications that theP=rx ~6 b Staff Analysis g F- . Metro Council would need to decide. r ; _y~4g, t ~~~,ra r - t - dv ar i l r 1 } ~ a ti ' M i.. v. ' 11 N' r a t ! Executive Metro, on an annual basis, through its proseribedintdgetpnocess mould decide to,'x~`} ter make funds available to titles and counties of the region. However, do not believe 11 , _ Recommendation : 1 s ~ ~ !g ~ ' that this is an appropriate addition to the functional lan. Recommend n r 1 to existing text P o change a t ~r' yS F ,_``I k y 4 ' - " lam'" t K MPAC r t, s ` { s - r Recommendationw ,Y ; 7 y - , tf; ;t I - 9 d -d '>r+Y, 1 , a 'r -w` 4 § 1 t s , ~ tt - # •J'c ki"' § June 5, 1996 b Page 66 r 1 'x'' t' ' 4 i'~j S d . I i` d Y - R i r yc. i - - s r r s- r - - - i a : err a k - - - r w ' t ' r x , ~!,,,~"4."~,_L`.,~- ~ _ . _ _ , " _ _ ~ - - - ~ ~ - , i , _;.-,.ttt. ~ , t' I d4 .yo- . dY' r y -E'sdt q r 5 fi*--' z _ - - y'f -'max" r ,a y' s ` . F. t.- r..~.-r...~s. 1.1. 1'L v___ c s_ -1 -'L _V_. _ r-,_h -I- -`L , - 11 _ . - . S p p ~ri 3 „t .......wz,mu.:.c:..x,.~umm._~_ -mss m d = a7a , I z ,anti's c N w x+ 5- ; G°a s z - - - a, tom,, a - ra , Lam; v z Pro posed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Managemrnt Functional Plant , , , j d y~1 ,Y_'W 4 F " 6 t - - Amendment 67 Testimony 23 s r r T' , Number Page Number * r a ~ a y4~. ` Title Title 7 - lines 617-618 y _ ° 3 $ ' - k Jim Nicoli, Mayor, City of Tigard * $ Proponent(s) I i' _ 7. I v€a 3 r } _ °f f .i~4 4; P' I 1- - .d-.5~ - Line 617-618: e. 'A recommendation for where the unaccommodated . = lr,-s } , - r i l , Amendment growth could be located $ , . 11 `s ~-h I' 11 i , # - t raft m~ One of the concerns with the management of the urban ° , K I.. 3 Staff Analysis growth boundary >a' t is that communities could simply suggest that growth be accommodated rd, k F ~ , . some place else. The cumulative effect of this could be that forecasted r ~k . ,i, growth would not be accommodated as required by state law. This - 4 - ti,, requirement was placed in the document to have any city or county which could not accommodate growth within their current limits help Metro a e -W with the task of finding other appropriate places.; - . ti - , ; - 1 { - j t+ `x ~ _ " t "S - x a4 x- 0 'M -1 € at + Executive i Cities and counties, along with the region haveresnmtstblities for accommodating growth. Recommend no than a to the existing text. : x O~, 4 r r Recommendation 8 e, t ~ e, x ' ` g` 4 r w MPAC' ` Recommendation , j - , t ki K'- - -c i 3£ f d - t - d 3-, r i : r-.~~,~4-g~p ,,j1,,,~__.',~--' - I-,; ~~'4~, , ~ [ ~ " 1, t June 5, 1996 4 Pagc67 4? _ ;j 4 .I s ;i r - - .r _ w~ 4 5 t 1 5 4 Y* p - -L 1 --fJ L , M - k - - - t' , _ wy 4 j C T 11 t r - - i t a ` t j i r ta= -T - - a a...,- j L S _ i F t 5' i _ 5 CL 1 . I, -1 ~ ~ 4~ ~ I ~ ~~r :.E 4, - 'A L- ;~M , - k a _ . - Z s _ _ _ _ 'x 5- ell -:1 ~ a- nib ' ' a ~roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan r' y , ~ f ~ ~ - Amendment 69 Testimony 68 " ~ " , : Number Page Number - V a : t ik s - r Title Title 7 - line 617-618 x * ~ _ . ~ ~ - L F `4„5+'x",.F,;~ c-- z ds` ~ . ' a- - . g , P 3 Mary Kyle McCurdy, I000 Friends of Oregon Jf ; Proponent(s) a' a" y ~"-4 K . ' * ~a 's r I s r V - Proposed If local government cannot accomodate fairshaze population and ~ ;tom` -A ° Amendment employment growth allocated and instead recommends that excess should R- } >M~ y , 5 be directed to expanded UGB area, then either local government or ' ' ; > 3 a Metro should do an analysis ofinfrastructure and service impact including, ` ` ,L analysis of sewer, water, roads, stormwater infrastructure, fire, police, s - j %a x , 'Y and school setvices.~ :r:'::,:~. .-i - ? E`'~-.S y.~- 3 are - a L There are costs to accommodating growth within the current urban P; 5.-- "O , r Staff Analysis d growth boundary as well as by expanding the-boundary. The Metro 2040 4 - r ~ Growth Concept does include accommodating growth in a compact ~ ark , . %Wi ' * k a , fashion. ` S"r 1 r~ v a. ' r x was" " v j P' f: z ~ - ~t 5 f ' e -P snd ~K ~ 1 f _ _ , % Executive Recommend that the text revised as follows: " ..adjncen t to the -city or coon t`> Officer _ g ~ X, . 111-1 -e n ak>ag?si LectfiBr sU tsmatEthG ; I I cost of . R ins icd r Recommendation t" h' P wservi ai P , x y y + + 9ompancthoseavnhesmaated..,. ...tm?®cito7t f fW f,' I 11 111=11,11 ;111 ;r- • { 4- a 3 r bra ~,,,sg MPAC S Y Recommendation N- t f i` - a ~,.yA k Z 1 _ SYL -j 3 r' '7 = i June 5, ] 996 p r~ Page 68 $ r-. x !p r . ~~r-} rn~u Sy 4s 4 II f 4 f4 ~ ~ S S - > 6 s - L M ~0 - _ u»u'v'>^"e n+r-d,. "+m.'F°• Ar kz 4. ,k ,'t j - - e - i '*t l 4 F s' k- - - Z .r , j f, U ! E " --~L " " -L, - $ ' y ; 10 ~a r'-` ' 't F' t{ c-, rr k L1 -j, ~,t z s s F a ~I _ -1 MM ? 1 ti _ 1 - d F ~-b 4~ a, i 't - 4- - 6t 3 1- A 'S { _ F - i 9 d hJa - s "4 - _ s r FFF i f - - $ --.If.".~.T~ '-^_^.t~'.Ta~'wr~~..s.-r-r•~--~."-,-'C"` lT.orN'f`ti- -rr.^_'ve~-~~n'o-^.--i--^ - ~C Ht.J._ ...Y...r-... .c ~.~.n _ s"•-LL.•-1~.5 .t S. _ _ t. 1. ~.~~i v. .....t _ . _ _ . ~ . ' -L.= _i. ~..t~. € a"s x w }fYtzi - J Yin,-7 r - - 3 - - id .Y~r .Fmt 3-A 54 3 _ _ E 3' 'Yt,$5Y ~,h ) i -11 11 ~4 s y"i9 _ - - _ t - } f ids i 6- V}d F~ . ,q '-+..:~+~..1+....~.r.. .6..➢L'4,..aS."Pv. uY Ysk` x*h,3yi'. ..:............~W...~. `S t,~4 T~ A'E':R IK - ~ a. - - - g a `pert 4 rnroposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plana X, I 1 Amendment 69 Testimony 97~` x. ` r ~ _ Number Page Number x`. .1 I r-r,--ire r _ ii _ ~ Title Title 7 -lines 628-629 ` - d ` Ez"w - r Proponent( s Robert L. LeFeber, Mayboutne Real Estate - - - r r" as t 2t ? I'll, 777' - ~11' , , delete lines 628-629 r , a Proposed } t1 % -11-1111 - a Amendment -1 - " 'e. ~A' 3' D iv r- ,x `7 _ - 4, ? rs1~~,,e~ fir, _ w y - Adjustments to parking maximums -t may be made by local jurisidictions. - - a Staff Analysis € s Adjustments could be made in part on the basis ofcuttent lack of transit. a Lq- "4 L However, transit could be provided later, but building and development h - x y , ` , '11 1~ patterns set. If development plans were designed so that expansion onto 1>g ~ ~ ".ft Y 4 parking areas, if not needed in the future, were anticipated, transition to - I I , ~ . less parking would be much easier. ~ 11 . ~LL ~ 3 e r* 1 ' I . Executive J {T € ~I 11 Recommend no change to existing text. - f t Officer o- x 3 Recommendation Nc h ~ t1€ r $ - a- , k r , ~ MPAC ~ t n t a ' ' Recommendation r i irz F 4 { j~ 2~ K` t a. yFq t' , F June 5, 1996 ~ r _ e, y k ti .qI' ¢ x - , Page 69 u p s - ~ V t _ a - f ,r €i C s. _ LL - t Oaf - ~tla„x' - yr t - k t F - k71- R _ f .~.u'~yav: "q!.`4- - Y.9s - F:,3 ff'£a T f - t j1 -f - S It . - -1 't• r 1- _ _ - s J '5M .,f - .'6r{' s. a §tf ~ { "k '-71~;-- '-~,p , ~ - ~ . ~2 - , 1 I 7 x# ac r L-1- ~ ~ ' ~ 1 '~7:1~ ~ ~ - ~ - , ~ ' , I - ~ , - ~~q 4 1 -1 4 s rv~ 77-~~o~,..-..~-....~~r y ..::..t - Sx - ..,t - - ` r - - ~I - _ _ x 'gal.'` ^Y LLLLL a, Y 'A s ^.'3'.U<"AQ7W K.ya' 7 +g i 1 sue' c FF ~ 4 - v-, rt eccunu.vvn x~a~.u.cm~.z,~......,a._.._.~_ ..o,s". ,-c. a: sss,eniau. -m'w r. - S.1 r _ ~T , s h - - ~ . ~ " A- ,-t (~roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Y ' ' 3 e P P -Ta .a Y A- .'L ri~ .r` a x Amendment + r t _ l y 70 Testimony 23 w r q x i5 } Number D Page Number f a x a n - - > - 3' _ v b , c y £ Title Title 7 -lines 650-651 'F ; S t 1 i, E LF V k Tim Nicoll, Mayor , City of Tigard " , Proponent(s) s s - , .ms`s Y r ,-c- '~:~ATi3y~`` - :tF i`~f l°i"'4'nt3[i S-"Y bys ffi.>r~'. r~i~cr$vicivnns r ~ - ' 4 J Proposed a a com -r r Amendment meted- phance I?. any change to a comprelensive plan or , ,1 „ implementing ordinance shall be consistent with the functional plan r? W: 4 i ~s I requirements contained in titles I through 8. ~ ~ t , - - -a 11 1 r F - s„K tr~~rcz, ;r { 4 rts..~- £ 3f 1 Staff The existing text provision was included so that even though a local t z p Analysis jurisdiction may not have made revisions to its comprehensive plan and , " ~r ordinance, individual projects would not "go backwards" from the intent % ~ , -s-, of the Metro 2040 Growth Concept. , - - t 4 S S , n Ya~„4, k - - N. `+y~"1-~'+a.F. r~> R 3 k T' T~11 ~ r -4 ffig } 'arc , ' v -i Executive: K , T - While in general, Metro does not wish to addressiniiividual projects, , ~ ' 4 A - Officer Recommendation early and effective implementation of the Metro 2040 Growth Concept is fish +T 5 important. Recommend no change to existing text. , ~ .7> ~ i i r n T SJ t s E '•f :r'I 1 - i t- 3--{ vi, , t i r, i MPAC zr as x x~ E ' Recommendation } a~ y 3 :t li, .2 1 IL' .2 1 IL' .2 1 IL' L c } 1, t_ s Fd 'a i ~ 1,- r i Yk , ~ t M _ s s ) 4 A , !we 5, 1996 11 r - 'i Page 70 £u` - a sy i < } , wR.d z - mow- x~ S G K* ` a - g - .erg - r 1 € rs , k - r t{ h5 Y C1 ? i'Y d a- -3 - 4 - 1 # 1 - -'U ~d i 9 f"` 'h ) b ,4 - - x ; hr J'F- } 'i' Y d 'r i -3 Y'1, ; L' ,rf S a - - _ .t 3 A k trfa - t 4 1.~' q~i Z /FA i T - V 4 11 `h f E 3' - - f 9~ i b i._....1. -.i i~.a...'._-..~~-.... _.~c ._~.-..1 ._ac_. , _...1,.. 1 ._"-..v..-__.-._.».-a __-1.L - ,.r._..i +.tv ,tv I . "~1-- MTh )..r _ e~ f r _ . - S +"H R - - - - - sib r e ~x J x~ ' ate`' {r .a ..x. _ t - ?3 si .~,ar a rte i a .m kz a K - - - i S L...'Y td" rt' , -t t, - v 61 k'~' 45t' r z' _ - - n x ,F' = 3, rf` ~'.,jF ra tz,gN xi -11 Proposed Amendments to the April 24, 1946 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan sf~x~ * r Amendment a r 71 Testimony 23 s i I T4a~ Number , r:-s Page Number . Title Title 8 -line 679-680 , x# . 3 . 1-1 - _if ~ e t~q - s'~ skirt t a• a f Jim Micoli, Mayor, City of Tigard i1,*r_=• - Proponent(s) 6~6: p~ - - r aj - - ~ Cj x 's 4 i trr a i s~~ - I N~4Fny _ 5 - Vile definition of Designated Beneficial Water Uses from ODWR should ~ ~ a kr Proposed , ~ _ _ p 11 1. { s Amendment be repeated rather than referenced. ~I 11 4" Ks,_?, Staff Analysis This could easily be added to the definitions section, as long as it was 7 ; _ t ttt clear that ifthe state changed the definition, this reference would change F~~~ } c as well. =+~z-a t q - .t x p S- -r-~ x f s ' s. _L, , F - i fN y _'t'I11 ~ 'Y t z Executive Recommend add definition with reference. r ~ Y weerx x Recommendation { µ ~ x MPAC ' _ n , Recommendation t,' I E 4 -rf3 1'A~ 1. I ~ Y - ; r Ez„ dk Yy? it 1 ,*a ✓ i, q a „eZ L i June 5.1996 {n Page 71 rR~6 `fie ~x 4 H i A ~E zyr °r..~ 5 raf f ~k'FF , ;,.Y y zr e" - -°c ~z3' 'Eea -,z; : we°m,:_ - _,j , Lx d kLLe , e _ _ ,L A - Y- - 1 J i C -r~ 'T d 1 t 'fi 4) . I^ t ~ , ~ , ~ , , ~ - , " , _ - ~ - , _ Or " - I", _~,e ~6 " , g G - ''wCi r - - - - J "',i Y- r, ~ma - _ ' - i€ x i Kµ F f r q i' 4 4 } i BE L~ t- •n^ra~n_.`^.n~~';" 3~~.^"1.` /^Y_ziPy~~_l[~'YlP'•^' r. ('I f J _ i ~~t.- Ji i2.F_.~~._,__ ~L. r~.~• r._ 3 _ ] f "i• s _~vt..._ ,.......r..tD _ e i - -__.r..... 7L..,~ r.5...~ a r~ T _ , : i:. n n.; _ v~iyaa s.w`..Y'_,t'j'd- - s6 _ ¢ T r _ _ _ x . tt I'" v w?+~MVI"r' a r~--.;.a-...LL_.._a~....n.:s sisa~.. .e.ti, ' 1 - r' y •fi r* r't-u.} '4 i Proposcd Amrndmrnts to the April-14, 1996 Urban Groulh Management Functional Plan 4 Fri r '""Fad- c ~K 5, , f- 2. 'fi Amendment D ( r ` 5 72 Testimony i07 ~s - 1'1 3,,, Number Page Number 1 r 3 . ; I ~ C4. ~.~vS 3s-f F s tR - k, r5 $ ° ' Title Title 8 -lines 690-691` a a C , h.~ t emu. e , 'I Douglas W. Bollam S4 9 4 ~ 1 Proponent(s)' kt a : .A Proposed t "~~F D~ g Y Amendment Lines 690-691: Additions and alterations to existing structures and k x xor ~ - H 3~za.n...rt 1 n dtsyelopmerit that do not encroach into the Water Quality and Flood 5 4 Management Area more than existing structure grwdcvetit't}}~'y~ end.M s -F Y rk - 4'i - Zv'•,:...... h 3 b''-n K 7S TIt s _K~~R ~m - - ~q.,h st' i, - _ Pi s This change would presumably apply mainly to existing driveways or w 1 r } A -IM Staff Analysis , 5 x roads. X7 " f ` p5} u c f i Tr.45r1~L s z , Executive Recommend change as written above. t - s, Officer t' , ~ aka u~ s l Recommendation r. 11 I w Y2 y L, M i I- 11 5rii _ Y Recommendation . i"- 3 66 r-Gt 9 'L - , 1 } 'V i L( ,ter ~qs t - i',-, 4S - - d Y4 , rs i ~ f 9 June 5.1996 ` 4 ' t ? 6 LT3, r a4,jrF k y,,, i J C FF - d. F .p'^"~,•a'4xnx~srs i•°s t~tSA Y t ..3 1. f o r l 6 - C 14 2 S r,Y y 4..,L y. € - 3 ,y - i r x , $ r 1 - . U ~ - i~":, I , , ~ ..f} _ 4' 4 Fitt -;dr,, - x x- _ - a qxq~ ~+'"4t -.r I t 'Y 3' 1- -S t 2 y Y S - 2 k 1 , - - ' ~ f ` a fir' a ' ~ta_ i tic [ - _ y .ri 7 -l i, , { d f , l i ~ - 11 , ,r . I ~ , , r I I ~ - . . M , - , ~ ~ - "i I " ~ - ii;, ! - ,fie=`~T'' ^^1.--, R•- •s. r.^.r---.rte-- -....oa _ 'T"'- ,-'a. _ - - ti 3 111- - - i~ . - ~ - ~ , , ffit~, ~ y k • P f, ~la k.:, 'tc ;.z r r - _ t~,r - F-_ Tx3 - C 3§ . w 'Y ` ^,4. - 4 f.- f Y f. .u~_ t fl Z:: F l: - - . o r - w - n" y, T - , '~Z .;lrfzE F c r n r - r 4- °^~#Y`'% ~.a.G c~ r x F4,{~4 .s k...+: o. ....._,_._......_-.•.......sy, -^.-S ,'a'', W it "YFi+33t , pia{3 £'r _ - y'.,~s*-' 2N x,~" - - ~1's ,-a~ ~""w~ six t~ r 4 a L - k~`y - ~..~v.,_t-~~i . roposed Amendments to the April 24, 1996 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan . + r " Alm rl im~ x , , I ~ ' Tz- , g a~ K - Amendment M Testimony 23 - c ~'.v - fr~ " .a. - Number Page Number~~ "_~,__7 I . 1'11"{ try H k F 4n - t Title Title 8 - lines 698-699 4 t ~ AP t LY - - 3 '^'H °n 5 a { Jim Nicoli, Mayor, Tigard ; xt, s ~ ~ 1 1 __,{k4:.- Proponent(s) . ~g ai,v N.; a _ 3 - - < d k t i j ` The definition of Hazardous Materials from DEQ should be repeated Proposed rather than referenced. g' ~ Amendment P 1.~~ c Y~ r ri- a ti z , _7 - - `f ~ § P } This could easily be added to the definitions section as long as it was4 Staff Analysis g 'r _ clear that if the state changed the definitiotrthis reference would change - { u , as well y ' p~ s- L e~r ; t* - - ..rr-rte £"-t x r R.;.. a T - , fi 3 ~ I I r s -W L Officerive Recommend change, with reference. £t j Q ! ~11 - x Recommendations V } 11 x,,, - s r - . t ' , T ,ice "~yy'r•' _ 1 ar MPAC ~ ° % e J~ q, t Recommendation ' , j,, Y,-. ~ ~x f q j - Ri, ; • ,a e et -,c dpi Lg, , ,g r # , gyp- v f } June 5, 1996 Pagc 73 sss M Y_ i" 3>..f1 Y ~t ,'4.nr rss~^ - sxsr.^eayn xU.x _ { -1 ~'`.r d" E - - t - -r s - - ' ki - K' -r Ai' x^- k .k,-+' J t fh ° - r-axe s ~ -i 1""'' }qt ~'r 4 F T L ~c i'rv- 'l .ti _ - - r - `pct V z t 6 , - - --c } Lt i S P f - f F .t 1 _ i rf - _ - e. - , n a~'$ xY a s sT w " z . i s ° ~a 3 a°a - r r '3 'r §s 4- s'""~' '.ati r. - a .u _~.,...Y.....y..W,~.s,-u..g - =s h s . rt ",t `'r„ zu,7 - -,t s- r z 'vf yr k x -'f ' ~ a k r k~~~ ~ ~ ~roposed Amrndmrntc to the Apri124, 1996 Urhan Groulh Management Functional Plan t-k. - - , of 1 Amendment 7q Testimony 9 ' 4 max, ' 4 Number D Page Nurnber G{ ` > - _ Title Table 1 -line 753 LLLLLr: - f~ C, 1, - r i - t - =r ate- _ .'R.,~~ q r t t Z~ rs ,t Gordon Faber, Mayor, Ciry of Hillsboro r F f Proponent(s)° t 1 t 1 t F' F4 i5 °'-y 3 ay ttr Reiiec:t 11iiisboro's 2017 HH and Emp. estimates for its planning area in ~ ' ~u`~t~ - Proposed Table 1 ofTitle 1:23,454 HH; 61,483 Emp. xF ?s t Amendment . > Ufa The single faznily/multi-family housing mix in Hillsboro arti5cially skews' , a x,~ new housin stazts towazd MF units without evidence that market will _ ~ 3 support the required mix on a sustained, long-term basis. y2 .f t } ` it N 315^ yF yr i ,i td -w-~ - z t 7 z a a arm r ` The capacity number are listed for existing city limits. Metro did not attempt to forecast ; > _ u ' Staff Analysis or suggest whether presently unicorporated areas within the current or future urban growth U t ~ - ~ ~ r r boundaries would annex or not s+ , - m ' I The intent is to ensure that cities and counties can demonstrate that thry can accommodate € `~_r- ¢ fig' ; , ihcse capacity numbers. The market may or may not respond but the twits will not be., - ` ` built if thry arc ant permitted In addition, recent evidence suggests thatregulatory - ,r!I, 1 barriers,rather thxnmarket factors are one of the primary obstacles to mttlG-family a~ a developments. In addition, the state's housing rule now requires drat cities and wunties in . Y l r ilte teigon provide the opportunity for 50% of housing to bemulti-family. 7 - - Executive Metro should provide numbers for current city limits and planning areas if i R I _ A }n ~ j Re ommendation requested. Recommend no change to singlefamily/nittlti-family.;'r s~~4'k, 4 . + hz r . MPAC - x' a` , , Recommendation ' j. F S f u T c , r n - { 1 ~R ti _ ~ a t{ r -_y w - ~r xy{r r r { t June 5. 1996 g r , s ° £ Pa a 74 a - t S - t P z+ - 4r 4 I r a > $ aj* F h_ $ - r 1 _ _ t- l^ F. ( 7 a 1 " r• - - ~r t R f , n t x 6 i - 1 .r v','J 7 4 F t' - 4 j i- - E`er d - - { ,r. ',F T` 1 j t jrrL., r!T 4 Y - t 1 -n ~ T d... n ._f_~_ _ r._, - - ~ ,m _ , . _ _ _ _ . _ _ w _s -.s, t ~ _y _ _ - _ ' v. _ e. _ e . ' 43.. ` -z - 4 r ~v , , ~ ~ . ~ --Y , ,~-z ~:ha I ."I", , ,i"-i , " - , 2 - ~ ;7- - , , , , , - ~ ~,I~ 'r 11~'I~il-,---' , i -1- , I ~ ---7--" ~';,J~~ a";~, 1,1- ~ ~ - N 4 a ~ , 4 0 ~ S1 ~~t 11 11 - y Proposed Amendments to the April 24. 1996 Urban Grot+lh Management Functional Plan aW € ' t} ( k1 I' , r~ ~r - - Amendment 7$ Testimony 20 * - t-c eT Number Page Number D Y -A6 ,F'a k S ~.d f 7~ Title Table i -line 764 xx~ fi ~ r- . s' - '?xk 3'e` 3 a-.-rh - 01 _ ~ Proponent(s) Paul Thalhofer, Mayor, City of Troutdale ~ - : x ~«Fx 51 - Troutdale has less than 1% of the regions households (.64% according to€ g° g f' F , Proposed Metro's 1994 figures), yet we are being asked to accept 1,264 "extra" 4 Vie; ~~'s Amendment M - dwelling units by 2017 under the Zero Option. Troutdale's current , j x,, annual rate of development is consistent with this growth as well as itsp~' inventory ofbuddable lands. 1 _ f ,,~,Tx,, x 4 A 4 tw. tiff}' n2 "tir"f.s . ~1,, - -11 'M L 4'v1i, `x yx„ k 33 Yy x k k Allocations were made in large art based on the amount of vacant 4 , r Staff Analysis p r buildable land available, not present population. Troutdale, on the edge t r ( of the urban growth boundary, tends to have more buildable land than .~'N * - ~ - y s s~ I Iv „ many cities. ~ yi ~ ct; j ,7 .i 11 ' F ; r a r - `tc r 11 ~r/k s. 31 t ~dy-n~$ l k Executive Recommend that communities in east Multnomah-Cwnty review , P a N I Officer capacities to see if some accommodation could be made. ~,,fk i Recommendation n 47 - Y C' ,S' T t 3 1i 5 fFF S X- S_, Y 4L f - GR , i ~T _ s a MPAC , r 5 Recommendation F i ~ c I kk ^r s _ 4-T-) irti _x b'~6 iC ` N June 5, 19% Page 75 ' s , ` t x'4 r C t~ 'ay -i5-v 3'.k E x F ~ k r r n r a r~ N -ii~~,~,~,~"-114,~-- L ,-,L~,~I,r'-:~!--~~: , , ~ Fi'SI~111, § Z i r ¢a iF aroma t. r,r a a - _ +J x} + .x r - - t.t N F - - - -r---`~ov r x tl r 5 L - s J f r r - F C. r - Fc, : - - - - :t _ r: - i. x v.v.,.. - _.r i _ - - - 7.1 } r s'z , v c y tr r5 h d Ar s - t t S - ~ k`? ~l 'x 3 zs'°3 t~ ,x - 4 _ X10„ §s -r. xi Y A, _ "t ,W Propoxd Amendments to the April 24, 1946 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan - r to i aF x r YY2S F 53',y YFS M~tt 95 - - - t %L,}„hr y Ry~•nl i,. ti Amendment 76 Testimony Sp r -I s t h Number Page Number D F Ana . xy k5 - Title New title? { Tasha Harmon, Coalition for a Livable Future e ~ i Proponc.u_) Y. y, ^t a~ - ~rr ti~ _ 11 Add a new title addressing affordable housing. a' f tj ~,,r a Proposed a - i ;t~ g, x r Amendment rv~ i 4 X97 _ t . --a VN H~sS -9 - Z <e a ,5, r}nr"•-}-~ -"rte I ~ K' r -71 - I I., Attached is an outline by Larry Shaw, Metro Senior Assistant Counsel s " t 1.1 ~ 3 t Staff Analysis r ' { a q which contains possible recommendations that cities-and counties could _v w ' t J avail themselves of to provide more affordable housing. r f E . ~`~k E 4 - - - - ~ C ~ `x ~ rt t s c A3.~. AY F r - s Executive i ~ q N pus { Recommend consideration of additional title for affordable housing. a r Officer tM~a ~ 11 Recommendation s r %-g 1 ~M { 1 Y MPAC r s S € r - Recommendation ~ , !>2 P - - - 1 - N - . r r r 1 - } x 'r {fit f~,t t f 6k a ,I K~ rs 3 r A June 5, 1496 Page 76 t j ~ , * U ~ r,. t -I- - h , w - - fi , r t,.r t- ,r X-~ _ , dP , L ~ ~ - ~ . . , , , " : r~,~~, , ~ , ,1,0,,Y~,, r,~-`,,~gU-,~~,-,-:~,, ~ tA.TP - , , ~74- ,,I- , 11 Ii -1 ~ , - , , ~ , " - - , :0, , - ~ , :1 ~ _ I ~ I , , -~,~~,U ~ £i l} As L ,'i ¢ f q i1 b 3 ! g _ a* f F, vt 'S i rL K y 4 z E - iF- -g:5 C ' ~ " Fes' x c 5 _ ,I , b x" i Nl -rte - .`Kell - - s`ub' -S V 7 - I . - ~ - ,"l-l-', , - . ~ a { y yPd - IF - - L - 11 . r~ t y -y - - - . A B Ki R . ,,Rgl",,~ - - , - , - ~ - ~ , , - 'i - B r'-" - it Y 4 f i~ Y - - L t f'- ~M,i~ r- r C 1`35 ""ma y „°l?E Y' - _ x = - - , --i. '.i ~c V. } 7 e. «•fi.. , ~ fwd T5 7-- ~rZ x - -'~e4- rf M E M O R A N D V g A, ~i x x M A a~ I 1-11 p StdG-y" T a 3 yi, ~'3 t 1 k a f -a"~~ h L's r z t - a n s a_! _ ( si"fit ? t s ''f'x b METRO ` -s yg-efU -t ~y'PI - I,- t 'fi r ~ - - ' ` `S W .--r-: 7 III 4§~_ - a z Date: May 31, 1996 , ~ s i To: John Fregonese, Director of Growth Management Services rr a x~ 't4 _ s y From: Larry Shaw, Senior Assfstant Counsel , ~,x ~ l., A - Regarding: Affordable Housing Title ~v 6 " t j , _ ~ a 'x Introduction ' r ':x ' • Councilor McLain has communicated her support for the concept of a separate affordable housing r3i _ y ~ M 1 r h functional plan title containing recommendations suggested by the Community Development ~ ' Network (CDN). This memo (1) summarizes the statutes on manufactured housing covering the ~ ` g ~P_"~, Manufactured Housing Association suggested amendments; (2) recommends incorporation of n some manufactured housing provisions; (3) in a separate Affordable Housing title combining - ~t : ' r CDN and Manufactured Housing recommendations. 11 s F. I k 4, t-- - 5 rte-,- ..1 F Manufactured HousinE Statutes 1 r : ORS 197.475 has established a policy to provide "manufactured dwelling parks within all urban ~T x growth boundaries" based on clear standards since 1987. Each city and county is already required r~~ -W - ~ to make such parks an allowed use and, especially in areas zoned 6 to 12 units per acre, project , £ ~ ~ . and meet the need for such housing based on market trends and an inventory. ORS 197.480, u 1, 197.307(3). Only safety, not age, restrictions may be used to prohibit placement of manufactured 4; - - - " 4 , k~, homes. ORS 197.485, 197.312. Manufactured housing is included in ORS 197.303, "needed housing." However, cities and counties do have authority to adopt "placement standards" like x, x~ a size, foundation insulation performance, garages and architectural codes:-{ S 197.307(5). h x Manufactured Housing Recommendations ; i Y ~c~ : y - i, Consistent with the CDN separate title suggestion and Councilor McLain's support for one that is • / P. primarily recommendations, the following approach could combine the manufactured housing , t suggestions with CDN affordable housing recommendations: . _ - fig,", { 1- r • Recommend that manufactured housing park restrictions to five-acre minimum lots be , f y reviewed and modification to a two-acre lot size be considered. " t r t 43 ct,Y n = S i?F 1 r ,1 • 4 - Recommend that attached single-family duplexes and triplexes be encouraged and "-7 t r Kti' L ,p - distinguished from manufactured home parks. _ r as (D. - 2 , ~ , 5' _ _ _ 4L '4 -'rv5' k S- F6f r Y i l "'k 4X57. - 4 I -I I - K r } K- 'tn - J .x3 - , - 4j., -1 ~ ~ , ~t 12 ~ f" , r-., r., "'r," - - j- - ~ ~.r. ~ ~ , -_LL ~ 'I ' I'~'2 r 1, . I 1. ; ~ , " I : - ~ L " ~ , , , =y z . t t JFf y Y ` x } } f . - r, , I r - , 3 ~ I r, I __~1".' ~ I ~ I - L . - ~ : . ~ , t L - - ~ _ ~ ~ . I ~ * ~5, , , - , , 1~ - . - ' 'L ; L 7 ' -tit La'" i' X-- - f , !Z~ 5-4"~, ,~o'-;,4 ~'M~` , - , , I - ~ , - ~ ~ ~ ~ . , ' . - - ~ ' : : r M ' ~ - - ~ - I .Y-I- I ~ _ S - 1 i y4~ t E• 4 lL:- ~s ; 4 r 3- - x - C T LL r. _ - Y 5 '!6 a0i~ € s r rF .a - t j _ -t ar .n K'. .x-} e , e -yes . -6w+4 S.ty...._.. - .3 u .3..L,m Jct.YZ ~i - h -"yY`j`,J"3,ry ` rz t A i~r z 's.as. KS f - v John Fregonese a a } I : s . x - r May 31, 1996 ` 3 + - ':d- "mod a ~ N, W ~ , , Page 2 , y .i These recommendations address alleged "regulatory roadblocks." The suggestion to require cities a ` 1, ' .1111- 11 ? . 2 I'll ~ , , and counties to "determine the effects of minimum parcel requirements for mznuL y ~ W 4 , I t,~.- dwelling parks' has been omitted here. y y y" zi, 3~ 7crh s "R r ~a~ i4kY i CDN Affordable Housing Proposal ~ ~k.s - 3 C, 1 The attached draft title begins, as suggested, with a restatement of the RUGGO objective. It ~ s f x ' ` ' _ I x li I 1z omits requirement ofa work plantanalysis. The list of tools that Metro "recommends" is used. iz , ZWR, M.P 9i z - The list is edited to remove editorial and additional explanation, parentheses, and requirement 1' k language. A general statement on undefined "unreasonable regulatory barriers" was the only k tsk 3 r ~ CDN "tool" omitted. Concerns about functional plan requirement exemptions in (old) Title 7, -r ? _ M t Section 2.B, are not addressed here. 3, a $ } j z' Conclusion ~ ~r The attached is a rough first draft to demonstrate the idea of a separate Affordable Housing title = 3 "fA r r - s a containing recommendations that incorporate manufactured housing. The policy content of the ~ ~s, ~ g~ "m te z~~ s r,,,`,: suggested recommendation provisions retains the suggestions of the testimony with some editing y. - r 1„ I~ 2, , of the editorial comment in the submitted list of tools. References to tax incentive programs were 4 7 ~ 1 added and additional required local analysis for manufactured housing was omitted. u , s," w~ j - zq - f @,.t k 45..i 1 ;~AN 9f .1 ,~ta'`'`'z n 11 k-~' ~ Enclosure $ ,O ~ an,, cc (with enclosure):ouncilor McLain, y ark Turpel t ' zr a s` kiti I:MDOCSa07.P&D'0420<01.MPLW3UGMFNC.PLNb531FREG.MEM 71 "x ~ ~ - 3 3 S ;r ~ L. _ £ F 4 k t lf$'aS ~ . 1 1 w `v ae.O x . e4 - f ,mom - .~.x{*, 1 kY t _ a ~t,t 1 x' 4 QQ 4 t e _ t 4 G' , }g N , 4' - b ,],'I -1 1 , - - 4't t- k - t 11k ' - r k t 3 I - " r i 11 I I ~ - . . , - ~k ~ : I ~ - ~ ~ " ~ " ~ ~ L , , - - , , - - - j - i a y_ r u3 o r rx NEW TITLE 7: AFFORDABLE HOUSING (Renumber Title 7 to Title-8) u z c a- ~'mz_'- - F ! y t erection 1. Intent RUGGO Objective 17 requires Metro to use a "fair share" strategy to meet housing needs, which fh } includes housing densities supportive of "development of the regional transportation system and.', , ,f t s ai designated centers and corridors," like Title I, above. Two other parts of the "fair share" strategy ' are addressed here: (1) encouraging use of tools identified to improve availability of sufficient: ' y 3 "y z 2 housing affordable to households of all income levels; and (2) encouraging manufactured housing to assure a diverse range of available housing types. 4 Section 2. Recommendations to Improve Availability of Affordable Housing The following tools and approaches to facilitate the development of affordable housing are recommended to begin to meet the need for sufficient and affordable housing: % r y~ " w f { 1 A. Donate buildable tax-foreclosed properties to nonprofit organizations for development as x mixed market affordable housing B. Develop permitting process incentives for housing being developed to serve people at or below 80% of area median income. f 0Z Pi n. g C. Provide fee waivers and property tax exemptions for projects developed by nonprofit ~4--;M organizations serving people at or below 60% of area median income. v 9 ° D. Create a land banking program to enhance the availability of appropriate sites for permanently affordable housing. M E. Consider replacement ordinances that would require developers of high-income housing,{ commercial, industrial, recreational or government projects to replace any affordable housing destroyed by these projects. r- y F. Consider linkage programs that require developers of job-producing development, x F 1 K particularly that which receives tax incentives, to contribute to an affordable housing fund. r G. Commit locally controlled funds, such as Community Development Block Grants, SIP tax d 1 - , abatement funds or general fund dollars, to the development of permanently affordable P mx~ housing for people at or below 60% of area median income. H. Consider inclusionary zoning requirements, particularly in tax incentive programs, for new development in transit zones and other areas where public investment has contributed to x the value and developability of land. c T E Page 1 - New Title 7, Urban Growth Management Functional Plan (DRAFT 5/31/96) t ~ ~ x _ ter` 1. _ 1 ' ~ 44 Y' _ i r' d t '4 t~...- r ~ C ~ rr Js w * -~'*r+ _ _ - _ t S _ .a-_ v 1 Lv. _i 1-. ra..~= t-.~~:.:_ - ~„t ~4.: ~ti ~ i_.".._ ~ ~.1_ ~ _ ~ ..u... ..i ~cL .~.~.i. . + `fie vg y - ---p~`8. - 1- - - nS f 3s , } # z„"'F' -Pp7 - F3 "A:.szw~.'s h'~'.,r...1-Y E l _ f. i T± t'. Er.: "f" - 3 t .x C .r'`i"a.: x t^w- - o~ - ><t7,k ;M= , r% t c 7 ' ; : a r < .a1_ "t om ' ,`S x, "'Rtc+~ y~ k s r - S { - ^c r -N7t ~'`i- ~q t ✓ ,i Vfit.,~,~~.-• t t 1A.-II; 7 p$nrL „u'b Ni - s i t S- -'S lix`*..y,''~ t,~-S. # - i # k., ~c - s '`n,"'1.•I j~'sr''hh r 3 _ _ t _ - r a ,rte - _ ira .7u -r^s~g s-+'' z d'"g fir` fi.•drC=a~` i~~. e -x > ati rd~.~- Syr °~"^x, E " - Y`" M 4 g 3 L 9T1 c ' `ss k a s d Section 3. Recommendations to Encourage aciured Housing ~sx i b rim" /I~„{ z3 'r '~`1f•~5 a I -R- I - 11 1111 , f# ~ 4 WVM ' .„<<I State housing policy requires the provision of manufactured housing inside all Urban Growth G seassi t~ y r a, y ~ 1;~ I H - Boundaries as part of the housing mix with appropriate placement standards. The following are Nt- - - recommended to reduce regulatory barriers to a ro riatel laced manufactured housin aQ 4 a PP P Y P B ' , ® e. yy-~ E A x F i A. Requirements for a minimum of five acres to develop a manufactured housing park should y V" " - r,, , s ' It ~i~~r a e be reviewed to consider a lesser requirement, such as a minimum lot size of two acres. r -0 - s ~ 11 ' B. Single family duplexes and triplexes should be encouraged outside manufactured dwelling ~ 1 I parks where zoning densities are consistent with single story development. x Sys ! ,4 F t ~ :t° ,r. t kaj L•1DOCSX07.P&Ds0430<OI.MPLtOIUGMFTIC.PLT.'WENTITLE.7 p -£r ¢ - - - - ~Y~ .'g;'R PfU-7 - 1 j7~ ru 7 s - 1 ,,,"aev a rs. 51111 I tiK F i Y N f ttS S ,f3 s~f-t Q { ; P~ I M, i -1 r~ r S" 4 T e Y ~,j j 5} f - -.f - r. ,F~~ j 3 F ~ ii`i1- y~ - L J {x4, 1 C S G~i,N 3 fr'r x'" _ d - p - ,j, P a v s - y - j Ly r-: - -s N t""4L: E~ 7 ~ - r•~x - !may , Cs"-NIP x' y r'' r,z - F - 1 ° rz1{• ~ , f 4 xp Page 2 -New Title 7, Urban Growth Management Functional Plan (DRAFT 5/31/96) - x~ a~` s`--rte ' F -t "Y r 1 tat S _ °s g3 R .Yt n ` Fay ; _ TM, '8r?-m'.*r+=,,m~w £ ' ~'u 'hy?-- d ; ~ ~ A , , ,1 o ^s t4 S, F S - T t - 3 _ l- -y j , L ' -x. zs' sx' f d t i` - z a J = rTa 'h SE s " fir; fP sr"*~''v.-,i'E+ i - - ..a - a`, -li, ua:i..n<r x 27-5 s r t r t ra. r < _ - F ` P - hT;', ,R..'c`'r t - - - t -T s' - +F" 1,3'is n S,~ i MMO','t _ r -R r $ pit y ~ - , W I'-,` - - ,1~ 11-, r _ , : .1 r r -~p;"-'~ d T, . ._n... -Y._~.. 1..-_._ 41.:.x.. `c' - i.., -~..a.i~. -~.-..~~....~iµ... .Y - - , - A cv~ -,„a} - - t, _ v - 's 2. tfi t .c v~r anti _ ! ¢ f z R`"'w'7' '.?t'-c - - ss, Y-rv - - } ''to- - r S; s r : v Y is F 't.: 111 W TV 'Ma jSya.y,5 , ~ .S. M V - i C 14 f - - 4 .i 4 ry >'Y4+2 2't S - Y1 a' ~x'F~y-tcP3t. y _ t, ax' as' T~ 2 h ,;i4 -1 i "x - ° .?z; M E M O R A N D U M r ;s . ~ ~ 11 , I r ° 'tt ,mss. METRO ; 4 x L- - t - tl~'1 - xfiF~ - - r t, ' i ate s., r ~ € ~ 4 tr TO: MTAC \ ~ ~ Y r .=°3.y Y FROM: John Fregonese, Director, Growth Management Services t§, n j ; W z SUBJECT: Buildable Lands and Capacity Analysis ~AY71,~ 26 M it Nine Variables - MTAC's Changes DATE: June 6, 1996 J $ k f a IA-?_ i F b s ) ~;'M'E & t ~ _ Attached is a sheet showing the changes to the Buildable Lands and Capacity Analysis . i , j according to the MTAC May 23rd meeting. , s F 7 It uses the *Nine Variables' format. These being the key variables presented to the Metro `1,111' x !-5 s .4!: 'ry:.~:i, ;~::i-~ i ; ; caritaw", sY I Council and its Growth Management Committee as specific factors to review. The nine W, fJ ':I are: population and job forecast, unbuildable lands, gross-to-net for future facilities, c t~, 4#P- , . underbuild, ramp-up, Zell factor, redevelopment, infll, and farm use assessment. t C After a presentation on these nine variables MTAC asked to see the estimate of capacity 7" ,.O- ~w s and land need when four changes were made. These were: I - " - , 1.) Population and job forecast - i 1. I s`~ Z'11, -1 - change the forecast horizon to 2017 M " A - change the vacancy rate from 2.3% to 3.05% (single family up from 1 % to { 5 i~ t r - 2/o) e . ~f -u 9~ - keep the estimate for new growth at 70% of the 4-county growth increment - _ - Ali" 2.) Underbuild of dwelling units , ~`t } rry -change the underbuild to 10% instead of the 15% used in the report to ' eliminate overlap with the Zell factor ~~1 1l " I,~_ 3.) Ramp-up s c w ' - change ramp-up to five years instead of seven to recognize closer than ' t f thought similarities between the current zoning and 2040 densities x 3 - f_ ' ^'y 4.) Redevelopment k r~ l s - factor down dwelling units attributable to redevelopment to make the net - y units 20% of the total capacity instead of 25% ~ y : F~ - a M Q,) The results show a capacity shortfall of 19,000 dwelling units and 2,000 jobs, s ~ i ' i a t a s i 'a L = I:VmA2D40palbuilWnlmta~rev.mem y f t` c t ~t a Cv` + wsv ss -arms.-t.,.h..ac.,-s~a~.v: _ _ r r a - ~ L rv. 2 ✓ - - -i v r s r- _ - - v y t u4 K C• y t w ' x U-mom y % z= i'4, _ a a P Iw j . ,j~',~, -0 - , " ~ - , , tr . - - , , , , , . , _ _ ~ r . ' r " - , -,R~,~` !~,R l f .F t c a t ' ¢ ~:1 ` - ` l _.__..c ice.. . __.i: - 1__a-.. s - .L,_ .._..__._..1. r _.u._. _.~..i _,r _v-_ _c_ri .L.._ -y.z ~ = r__ _-..r.-.y -A! -Mig y f tears" ,3-5 - axv9{ - r -r _ : j x i _ 'sue s i. SS-rR PA. ~ .cd'~'a.~:;ko~~ ~~~'~--c~,"~ x~ ~~3..'~~ ~ ~ .g z r- - - - _ ~ - r~ ---k ~ A# ~ -'f''~ k•~+ ~",,..r d = t~: ms=s S R u r a kw ram $ ; a ® . F 4-1 3 4 MTAC -analysis based on meeting 5123/96 I:Vmu040pawuild4nw,ucrevt.wbr p. B 6/6196 F 041* ;xM g t ~r t, f Initial review of "nine variables" from the Urban Growth Report -Only variables with recommended changes shown. Staff Estimate - Capacity Analysis € r 2 k- AAK, x ?4 Variable 1 - Forecast Original 223,423 f i sg 4: f Revised 245,836 Adds growth 2015-2017 (81 70% of 4 County Forecast t~ a ^ ZiU Vacancy rate at 3.05% (Single family upped from 1% to 2%) _a ° tour t Difference 22,413 -AA EMP Original 437,000 _ Revised 477,918 Adds growth 2015-2017 @ 82% of 4 County Forecast € 4 4`s t ax z Difference 40,918 sv t g F f{ Variable 4 - Underbuild of Dwelling units DU r -~~-4 d4 . r e k , - Original (29,105) At 15°6 e- yr r Y ; Revised (19,403) Changed to 10% to remove overlap with Zell factor r=~ Difference 9,702 _ - Y ` Variable 5 -RamP u r p DU x NV M t NNY O riginal (17,000) 7year ramp-up ~g Y~s Revised (13,000) 5 year ramp-up ,y c_ ,r k Difference 4,000 * NO I ~~k v k u x i Variable 7 -Redevelopment DU s Original 54,207 Residential redevelopment nets 25% of all units t;yr °~i~° cr e-y y Revised 43,911 Change Residential to 20% of Total CapacityT i s Difference 10,296 r 4$ ' ' Variable 9 - Farm Use Assessment No change, land considered available z -MM, P 2 Total Changes - Capacity shortfall DU- to . n g' Original 219,555 f ~A Revised 238,562 Difference (19,007) ~,4s % EMP 11 t4 Original 475,911 4 , 5 3 Revised 477,918 a b L4 Difference (2,007) Notes: T", t A o-- Other factors to still consider. delete mobile home parks from redevelopment acreage k w k 1 d~ 3'" + c F iri r f - K s -jZ i z~,..ax.~~'. t _ z'. -tom ~~..:a W S a "-uy^ Y 6 s s a'!.Y 7 t, =,a1 = Y Lf _..v_...,......~._,.,.,._..., _ :J~~;+~---`` •,r'-__.. YW`n,... <.t: i,r.:r•:n~,~s~,~~nz•~v:.~t; ...i..lN 4.,u ~..».4u... t: •':••L,. .~.{..~c.:'--•eWR,9a'.~?t•i.ir: 'tf "*tu t`'.~ t 'i ' It s prcident fcr Metro "ivies &1d counties" 9 to be talking about this need now V s Metro continues to develop come meess year-a policies for cities and coup- ties to follow now so the re , g l f 1 re 4VD ion Bari useup less land in St's easy to agree th iftot~dable ---.7 e,.one're9nement is wel• r` 1 1, housing is a good thin Beyondthat; - ft - however; the discussion gets more putting ideas for promoting ficult. How much is needed, when will le housing in the plan. The' it be needed, wherewill it go. what t's title done takes up plenty will it look like, who will it shelter, f space: "Urban Growth Management how much will it cost and who will , nctional Plan." It wouldrequire cit- pay? Players including potential resi- es and cpunties to, do such things'as dents,-advocates for low-income peo- a t ake sure they can absorb their "fair ple, neighbors, lenders, homebuildeSs ar bare _of new people and jobs; man andgo_v_ernments all view those. gg ge.parking;'tra@ic'and congestion;*;` tions m'different perspectives; aAtd q pm- d protect water quality and fish and the answers won't come quickly or on ..~i dlife " ~ Nothing fs satin stone ye`t; and con= - e~'-.Bu~or~~hhe sust'~ ~ ~ er3afis cronthid6 between Metro f' _ ratirsanil.couritres fnins a ufsdi`~pns;wp{cliOd l Pend te s e¢ r~.~.•.® s; to make zo`niag and other ehanges m ' is =®~y~ " f y after`.tliep'iptaDEg'oved'tliLs faII veto 'meutofaff EBu seeaitordablehous YY v ; :u.®Priidiagfea, ~dVx c Mi -6 f which will 'Ul tY to eaemghons fo k C t on od~~ oii on expanding * 'nl3uate"in r i daiy the : Enactingo ~ „ I P 3 y banowth The bound placement of affords e+ stro ed by other projs"aud • ~ ry,srolelnrisingland"andTiousmg _ Y_:... ;>.,...~t.~, ~ osts is hatl~debated Moving toward :ntO Providing general Hind orblock o goal of less land to house more grant money for development of of usi, plemto account the' _ fordablehousin-: s ' to liduseeople'ofalt income lev= The other sections of thegrowth-~" " ]s; in all aieab of the region: iNV- management plan are laigely:iequire :i 'j It is a ragignal'issue: While' j ' = wants, but so'far, this section is large _ ortlandhasiieenthe`abviousleader . lysuggestions. Metro'mayiva&to..:"..- n it; other `UfIsdkctions can't deny consider making it stringer in the In- t the problem"of duck the r'espoivsibll- terests of early action on woof fs be W 71 iry. t dri ; coming an increasingly pressing Issue I _ Recently, for example, The Oregon- around a tight urban growtkpound- Xian's Cristine Gonzalez reported that . t " tMashington County, one bf the richest in any case, cities and counties cec- 1 j din the state, has an estimated 40,000 tainly need to be thinking now about 1 people living in poverty. She quoted a how they can help with affordable = nonprofit group's statistic that at least _ housing as they work to build a cam- i,10,000 people in the county will bepact region in the future. t Unsigned editorials in this column present the views ofPhe Oregonian E Signed columns. letters and editorial cartoons elseuwhere on this page and. in the opinion section express the views of their authors and cartoonists 3 4-1L-9c t. L ._u.... 1 r Yr -311 y s'..sc?i rte, _ 7 L _,r a'_ a.` z`+E - yam` - - s - t"_- t a, is k5 tit r ~ _ - ,y'a _ - s s ^6:~~'"''FY .Lt ! f f - _ _ _ 4 - ~yt t-~, ra"3-~ 4 'TS - - 31 - .._.L.....,..e- ' .___w.« "F, .vav.-.- - st 'gym - t ' {yM1 V ODONNELL RRMIS ET AL 503-243-2944 Jun 17.96 12:25 No .006 P.02 _ - jz ~ S+' 3 i-- • z - - z - OTONNBLI., RRMIS CREW - c !y CORRIGAN & BACHRACH^ I- I -x'`r' t,Sr-.= ATtOANaYSATIAW / /Gj ik t3'!~~- M~,s,+".I„ - 1 - 1-7 1177 N.w Her 9eraet sFl, ' _ PaEand, Oneon 97109 ,7 v P' 4,,, r TaIJWHONR (50r)llympl -r' §-eaat6- t TAX: (aor) lAa•146/ tx c~ ' r c > rt f, i DATE: Juno 17, 1996 L` . - TO: Tigard City Council r f i 4 , , Q ~~fi PROM: Pamela J. Beery, City Attomay'a Offipe $,R b f RE: Undergrounding Utilities Ordinance ~ ''i, 12 ~ r 'i a 1 u ~x n ' f a When this ordinance last came before the City council, information was requested as to whether a -3 i 11 the provision currently Proposed as 1MC818.164.120(D)(4) cues a legal requirement or a policy` _ ti _ choice. This provision as currently drafted requires that funds collected in each service area , kl.F J ; s x Vi shall be used for undargrounding utilities only within that service arcs, It ie our undcretanding ' z ' -r qC'S - from the previous City Engineer that such service arras have is fact been established within the ' ~ e City. s , sp w t t ac We believe that It is prudent for the City to retain the provision as drafted though state law and r ^c ~ y ° ' ' , Oregon Administrative Rules (OARS) do not directly regulate the spending of funds obtained by T x- rt s a municipality in lieu of und"grounding such a number of related requirements do exist. We s x 11 its t ' r think the current approach to the most sound. ' X ' I p,s f For example, ORS 758,220 authorizes titles to form assessment districts to achieve r_ undergrounding. This assessment district works much like an Local Improvement District ham. . ~ ' a (LID). Pursuant to this provision, a city has the authority to require the conversion of overhead ~ a utilities to underground facilities. and requires that the cost of such conversion be assessed ` against the real property included in the district which is specially bcacfttted by that conversion. " $ ' { a amt st`" Y~~~ Similarly, OAR 860-22-046(3) and (4) provide for charging back of forced conversion costs by ?`fix U~ the utility to the customers of the city which orders the conversion. The city has the authority F T -tea - - " d ` } within that rule to direct that each charges be collected only from certain arose within the city. s i . V ' ~ 5 - Finally, system development charges, governed by ORS 223,247 al aeq, are collated from and x . ' ' spent on properties and projects in a system which assures that benefined properties both pay 3, 1 for and receive the benefit of the im z provemcnp in question. yy 9 j e 3 T 1* a_$. ~ 9 f ti3 4-_ i 1 . i- i p - a ~ r sv } ,P C - " - 4 -5- 1 1 ~ a ~ F .,ew•~y«.eu..+ L A- - t - F s W-4 - ,X a 1 - - y r 5 g t,~ 3't a _ „ a - i .r i ,.E.i y - - - - _ 4 -1 ant r +t 9 - t - f i - rxr c~ _ r f lh = - _ - S L rl r., , fs - - _ _ _ r. li . _ _z _ w . _ - 1 . T 7 I .1 Y ~ . _ _ t _ 4+ - ~ " - " - - , 0 - E'f-""' +*-vim '.1 -z T Y - Y 8 - 4 t h A -u H F_ 3 a M ~q-a_` _ , `,~x....a,.a-,..:,.,u,._,....~ "t z ats. -*s"~t,KnT~ ,Iii T~$ ~;h~,_ z 'ODONNELL RRMIS ET RL 503-243-29A4 Jun 17.96 12:25 No .006 P.03 € 1 , 4 x 5F _VC t F w a 1x`? 1"M ' r? "s pi ,,.y O'1)ONN1i1,T RAMIE CRDV/ ? nk .;k s a, aq, .1- U CORRI4AN & 8ACi1RAC11 4 .1 . > M _g r Memo re: Undorgrounding Utilities Ordinance _ 0' ~ ryt'i 1u Juno 17, 1996 ; , €u_ Page 2 st10 '-:7 Again, none of these ulremenW j- ~ ro4 specifically mandate that the City use the funds collected only 'w 11 -K ~ L. x x within the service rtes from which they have been received. t ould fallow in the most the formation ofian ~ 4R~ 1~^ -1 .V a roach would be to follow the same dice h y H, ~;i- i 4 undcrgrounding assessment dietrlet rnes . In this way, overall fais and some assurance that the ~ A proportlcs actually paying the foes will ultimately receive the benefit are achieved. t _ 3 ; , ~ mr I hVo this Information is useful as you discuss this ordinance, L'- 04 Iffin . . 50 cc: William A. Monahan ' r~.. .11 _ James M. Coleman - 11` I e 4~' WW-j"0W.ragm.na ,AN SL:0tzt t I -11 Y€/ _ik f i Ali. -0 Q f y# z v t~~'~ i t - F es ; `3~~y a'KI a t:, r ; i'~,~:~,~,L;4~,`~_'~3 , I ~ ~ B-%._. r k , .e' ~ d lx s a t rf -?f _ Y i R3 I ,y. } '9 _ ~ t 4 - d°`t 5,..x, 2 _ - J .jY a' - d. e" } '}tom! E k L - ~ } 4 v` 4 is~ i455 ~F t F tq 6 '.I"'r'" i -11-11 . .1- r~ t L , i r k s r k ----,~-"'-,~-'~~'.11~-~*~~-*",~~1.1,~-.",, , 1i -1 .V~.$'Vil~~_R~VF;, L~~~ s-_ Y` ASS }`~:~t' y l n~,+:ry-, s 3 c,"T~' ' r ,f/ a - rte E R r' ~ j `Y''7, vex' y Pj, { T 5 1. - t,_ f - c.,kSZ"4 -et s - " jti - - X~,- "UMV- I" - - s,~;- _,J, , - , - 'L- - , : 1, , - - , ~ - ~ - - _ ] 11-'. --I- 'a, sc`"c~, - - 4 s- ,a - mss. , oz--tr; t iii-,•a r _ ` - - ti M s{ ~`yF-, t t -k ir. ~rS ~ ,111 ~ t cs ~ "M I ~LL kS N o,„, ,z .i t --2 - ,t, 1 P t~ i {s. s r is.''v3;M.ti~ - s b /o(, _ ? s s 'r'."tf V4 4 _ r D - t„ 6 Tom, I'll ~ -Y -S'ii- ) ~r ~:'s• - GAS a+ D-- £ 3 R F F " - y MEMORANDUM 64 ' /ski ?x ~ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON - ? `rXVCR ~ . '7' - ~ t t „N W TO: City Council ` , FROM. Jim w and Ray Valone a - x s' x V-11111, , C s s s.~._ +'su_i ; DATE: June 18, 1996 ~ ' n r n z R'°_ r ' SUBJECT: WALNUT ISLAND: ANNEXATION INFORMATION AND ISSUES ,-'i ,t, t5! f - ,j - r r - A RECENT HISTORY AND EXISTING SITUATION r , N 1 ~ 4-: .r*,. The Ci 's current a roach to annex M -u" ation within the Walnut Island is to process owner YP P.x NiM I . " " ' ' a , .'d' ` initiated requests for annexation and to encour ? 4 - ` -;f ;g., age adjacent property owners to join the t iA-. , w,:_, a V annexation process, as appropriate. This policy was the result of Council's action in M;;' - " March of 1995 (Resolution 95-15) that rescinded Resolution 94-20, adopted in April of ` , ~ t 1994. Resolution 94-20 proclaimed the Council's intent to annex all unincorporated areas g , es, , h s 't,' s_ that are completely surrounded by the city using the 'island' method of annexation. The ,,,,max z M , r= r.,. 3 d> decision to rescind this polic was based art/ u on staffs resear of <r r'°g? , Y P Y P ch County health , OA'l -R ~ . . r , department files for reports of septic system problems and failures, as well as an -,mot=~~~- ~ ~ investigation into previous Boundary Commission (BC) cases of island proposals, A ~ ' ` including creation of Walnut Island. Staff found very few reported cases of septic system 4 ~t~ , W,l problems and most of these were minor. Based on previcus BC cases and the existing r ~ ~ ~ appointees of the Commission, staff concluded that the BC would not approve annexation - of the island given the widespread resident opposition. This opposition was expressed ` - : ,t~ ` ~ during the City's survey of residents in 1993. x ~~r ~ f~ t ° - -i '3 In recent months, there has been increased interest by property owners to annex to the , ~ : i City in order to receive sewer service and/or develop their property. Staff processed 12 vt Kfll - annexation requests in the past year, and encouraged annexation of nei hborin _ ~ : 9 9 properties. This effort resulted in 29 parcels, consisting of over 47 acres, annexing to the§ City. Several other inquiries have been received but not pursued because of the cost to ~~F o- ~ - the owners to extend the public sewer line. , - . -t . Yom, k ` ` ~ ' Sewer extension cost to individual owners could be reduced by projects that include a x ,M ` , ~ number of owners who would share in the cost, perhaps through a reimbursement or X`" r~ ~ ~-l _ _ , , r . ~ . - local improvement district once the area of the project has been annexed. The demand r + 4 1 , -3 SE ➢ - t - ? - Imo . 5 . ` . x N 2 L,e 5 Y ° t`'sk 'i - - 4i } -Z E J:h - - A£ t` E{F Ky a u r 1` _ ,r 5 "'9 ~ 1 2 5 ~ y - f 41 e/j 4y S S t '1 - (`Y -1 rti Y - xi - Y fE. Y s-` 4} (m 4 x k ~~S~ a 't' . ~ , Tw I r I I - . ~ ~ . . . I ~ I r~ r t_ x - -z. ..t.:: N ,,(t}~'~ 2 qt-VxS- - { S - { k-a 34Ftvwx 1 rs _ - - L _ - ,i,+Si t I R W J t3r..."..... _.~.-...+....u w.u:%mi,k.-✓,s:. e5.~a.~sro....v_.:t~-'a.wM1l.~ ...m.„ w..3.,.und<...v... ..:....._.L,.1...,. i r f Y jR ~T l NTU' `t i j - _ r SY V 1 -"~~7 for such projects is expected to increase along with a growing realization among ter: - f owners that most septic systems in the Island have exceeded their expected 30-year „TF . ~ 1 life. s_ Moreover, there is an increasing number of complaints of failed systems; the County s ' $ ` - + ' _ Sanitarian is currently investigating 10 complaints. Based on recent complaints directed to City staff, these investigations are expected to reveal failed septic systems i L }Y { 1 " releasing raw sewage to the surface of the ground. Those with failed septic systems ' will be told of the need for sewers or some other method of treatment such as sand m7 ; -fltarc Sand £Ib?rc ara ic-~~lly lcec 911r3Ct;V° because they are a s ' ~„~y arc frequently more ~ s , expensive than sewers, are unsightly and occupy at least 400 square feet of ground. k ~ ~ - However, they may be installed without annexation. , s ; 1 } ~ f F` 3~ : ~ 7 li - t A ANNEXA"PION INFORMATION - 11-1 There are several methods to initiate boundary changes, as indicated in Attachment A. " £#h - The first four methods are subject to remonstrance by voters in the area to be annexed or ;:'"M voters in the city. The three additional methods including double majority, island and N ~ ~ a health hazard are not subject to remonstrance of voters. City staff prefers to use the = f-~ double majority method for processing owner-requested annexations. Though the island method is not subject to remonstrance of voters, the resolution or ordinance initiating the n ''i _ annexation is subject to referendum. All of these methods for initiating annexation must A L R~ f'- ` , be approved by the Boundary Commission. ~r _ i4e, .ate ''f `i The health hazard method is covered in ORS 222.840 to 222.915. A summary of the ' ~ `-i 'V ~ ~~r - process follows. Territory otherwise eligible for annexation which is within the UGB may s k~K t be annexed by ordinance without any vote, if it is found that a danger to public health ~ i ~ ` ~ exists because of conditions in the territory and that these can be removed or alleviated r ~0. by facilities ordinarily provided by the city. This process can be initiated by four different - organizations: The city itself, the governing body of any district having jurisdiction over ' the affected territory, the local board of health, or the Boundary Commission. In the first~~ , Pi two cases, the city or county adopts a resolution containing a proposal to annex the t territory without vote or consent in the territory. In all four cases, however, the local board a cis r of health (Washington County) must verify the conditions. The initiator then submits the f , resolution and verification to the State Health Division and requests the division to I ascertain whether conditions are dangerous to public health. If the division finds - ' V'e ' substantial evidence of a danger, a hearing must be held within or close to the affected ' territory for the purpose of determining whether a danger exists. Depending on the ` ' findings and recommendation from this hearing, the Assistant Director for Health may y issue an order to terminate proceedings if no danger is found, or continue the proceedings if there is a public health danger. The city then must perform a study and develop preliminary plans and specifications for providing the necessary facilities to _ 1' a p - N'- a t 2 s r x t 1'- I y i l - Y r fl i n {!_f i s e _ s - - ~ - - x a k . - , , . - ~ ~ ' ~ - . ~ : : , ~ , r, I . . - I- 1 2 , ~ I . ~ , , . I " : ~ 1~ , ~ , : 21 ~ r I , : i..=r - r.. _ - ..___..._~=r-a=-.ti- _W_ i ..s_._ * , . . 7 ; 't - S - Y M - , - - , 7, ~ ~ - ~ ~ I , - , , , " ~ , - ~ - - - - ~ - I - - 1- , , , - - , , rl-~t- -U-g,--;j-1- , , " , ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ y S wS<4 ri'-r a~ )s-- - z' _ - - _ u ie - ix k rr K i s 3 n - t rn o7 , - iv- w f remove or alleviate the danger. If these plans are adequate, the State Environmental his ~3 Quality Commission shall approve the proposal and certify its approval to the city. The ' - ~ ,=F city shall then adopt an ordinance annexing the territory. ~y r„}rt { , . _ - tT f 4 X e ~ t In addition to the above methods, any 11 residents of the affected territory may apply to - the local board of health to initiate proceedings to annex the territory. Within 90 days, the r°-`! board must investigate the allegations of a danger and either initiate proceedings or a certify that the evidence is insufficient to continue. If the board initiates proceedings, then - t - -L' process uesc.nucu above would apply. T-~- , tc. - f"P"'," E SB 122 AGREEMENTS k t SB 122, passed by the Oregon legislature in 1993, requires the adoption of cooperative ~ ~R agreements and urban service agreements between each city and county and each r ,x Ia service district that provides an urban service inside the UGB. The urban service agreements will specify the provider of each service, set forth the role of each provider, determine the future service area, and assign responsibilities for planning, constructing t . T , 4 ' , and maintaining the service. In addition, this law created a new method for planning and 4:r < 10 implementing annexations. After urban service agreements are in place and two units of ~ r,~ government agree to a transfer of territory and service responsibility, the city may hold 4 a y'~ , hearing and submit an annexation plan to the voters. If a majority of the voters in the x r ~L'l r^, territory to be annexed and the city approve the plan, then annexation can proceed in a i ' , ~ a t phased manner according to the plan. ,Io, t41- ti Currently, staff is working on urban service agreements with the County, Beaverton and ~ ,A,~` the special districts that provide service to our area. A consulting firm will be chosen soon - 3 ~ s - -11 to help the jurisdictions develop the needed information for establishing these ~ E agreements. The schedule indicates that agreements will be negotiated by June 1997. ` - ' L~ r BOUNDARY COMMISSION REVIEW BY METRO ~ d -.4~ --e a ~-t The MPAC Workgroup has completed its study of the Boundary Commission and ~E. . E ti conveyed recommendations to MPAC (Attachment B). MPAC supported the Workgroup g Yt > , recommendations at their meeting of May 22. The recommendations are scheduled to be presented to the Metro Council on June 20. The Council may refer the issue to Metro's ~ t , r ° Government Affairs Committee. If the Council approves the recommendations, state 1 5 e{ legislation would be needed to enact the changes since the existing Boundary E T,11 . Commission is a state body and their function is defined in the Oregon Revised Statutes. t 5 , The needed legislation would likely be introduced for the 1997198 session. _3 ~FF pytj 1 r . Y X~,' ~y s _s 4 t - x a i "t r r` 7 S q P ?4 -V 3 J Y 4 f r } a'>^..,1,3T,xsa^ _ .,e..w-...c =a,.,, Rs s.t.. ra - tl r ~ ~ IC _ - +y R,. t r _ _ _ 'E~-_ ti$ r r e i rJ } ffF -t - .F a z p t a Yr t ! - - _ _ -mot' A q r - - - - i- ..j T- I _ t ,f - --r 1 x t - E t _ - - - - `F _ ,fir.. r _ - - C - 1-, - _ - , _L _.Y - Yom.. tF Now c e ~ 'a,,,,~f,5r°e+ ~ t,r _ ~ s ° - ~ t 1 - ~ s _ 11•~ ~ R a - ~.;!Y. k +{4 °y.*t v 5 - 7 - } -y r i - - _ k f s -r ,a 2 <as ~ 3 a s -x a \ --i i~ fv, s a rya 's.•js~°~.r ~ . ~.Yt 3. F,,,, ~5-~'at.• h. w?-i, _ - ~ _ - _ F .,2 vy ~ - F~ r, - "~~~,-fig - ~F: ..,:._...,:...•:~~3....3: ~x~~ ~ ` ATTACHMENT A d - 4 E, INITIATING A PRCPOSAL L-7 Fzz a Every proposal which is considered by the Boundary Commission must be started NO say "initiated") in one of several possible - r' d-`f 6-~AV M" ways. For some types of proposals there is only one method of ~~•,y - - Kati t'+ro _ n~z _ N"'v)d''`-acs' c.2 initiation. For other kinds of proposals there may be a numbers ' of ways to initiata. Listed below are the various ways to start 4 to -2- proposals and the kinds of proposals to which they apply. axy'r' `r 7 ; rrN a;5 n w~ ~ ; MINOR BOUNDARY CHANGES yM r y- I. Annexations or Withdrawals -Cities and Districts n~ k -nc x- A. Four Basic Methods NOW" * - 1. Resolution of Governing Body 2. Petition of owners of more than 50% land area ' E 3. Petition of more than 10% registered voters ' Ni - - - s 4. Boundary Commission Resolution J<.~ s via All of above methods subject to voter remonstrance by - ' a) voters in area to be annexed or withdrawn; or b)p°y~F c voters in the city or district pg~ B. Three Additional Methods gw 4! P5 4 1. Double Majority (Property owner/registered voterE r NSA" ' petition & Council or District Board resolution}-~'`~ x Esc - 2. Island (City Resolution when territory completely ~y surrounded by City) -Applies to cities only r got V 3. Health Hazard (Initiated by Findings of Asst. Admin of State Health Division) - Aoolies to cities only >r all of above three methods not subject to remonstrance of voters t"~~ c- r, II. Transfers Between Cities or Districts k MW? A. Joint Resolution of governing bodies of cities or districts F k~ 7 3iy B. Petition of 10% registered voters in affected territory l C. Petition of owners of more than 50o , land in affected 3 territory„ 4 k}K C. Boundary Commission Resolution r _ K PLC Actions - ?3 ? 1 r .s z c? - - xa 1003 - - ~1 W to-, 4 N:E tY y` 't %Wr F its" T FK t= •a t '1 .«-+,5 "-w. nc;f~^t'i9',.' tt. sal "i% s,,. Y 2 X K ! f _ - 3F '}k{€s 2cs~' s _ u 7r f p r- tss > x- X.r 1 y va[_ _ Y y .i, ~ E . 9 t - J 1. - .FFL . _ lam'.-.`-`~.. ^"r-"""-,..1.^' -`ts' ..~•1':• _ - - .ter---••+-••"nw_.~~r•t.` 4 c+~. ~~wlr. - lr-ter i ~ , man.,' - fl.=4'„?r ax - - - - , - - . - - - . VTR - a ak i 'psi , u„{ b r,, j L,. - e III 4 4W I IN 11~,EAEM ~ . % ~ 114, e W } a ~z.,x,4k s~_'tx' .u:..Ars~..xr".' ~.aa~sv-..~.zx'+,.'asa - - - ATTACHMENT B ~ k F Q 6? -mss rt- t x` $ - r 2412: - ^~r < ~ MPAC BOUNDARY COMMISSION WORKGROUP ~ x r RECOMMENDATIONS i >a'~"XS 4 ` ? 4 - t :x- z m,, , x j _ 1, Function and Structure --K,2 I t- I 11 e a ~ - W-, A. Scope of boundary review process be reduced to include only t' " J P i r - "contested" cases, which are defined as those in which there is a dispute TF ~ t~ between two or more jurisdictions or when a staff review of the action w w a ' concludes that it might violate any regional plans or local urban service # a~ r , rk{ ' agreements. - B. The boundary commission function be transferred to Metros 11 - 4 C. The review process be separated into "noncontested" and "contested" i f - " cases to streamline procedures. If a contested case cannot be settled ~1 -11 I y between parties, a hearings officer would be used to hear the case. a,e " R z - a.f - 1 It. Decision-making Criteria { A. As part of transfer of boundary review process to Metro, statutory ~ ` language be enacted to give Metro the authority to establish clear and , ` objective criteria that will be used to examine local proposals. Metro 0 would work with local jurisdictions in developing the criteria. s ~ -r. C,//"",r a, V t ~t a w s III. Geographic Boundaries . - I r i{ -may a~ A. Jurisdiction should be limited to units of government that are wholly or.~ t partly within Metro's boundaries. Proposals outside the Metro boundary ~r - ii, would be processed using existing statutory procedures that apply in ; F _.t . ? areas of the state that does not have boundary commissions. Z~ F fl 'Al IV. Funding ~ rI A. Funding for Metro's boundary review office be provided from three , sources: 1) A minimal assessment collected from all jurisdictions subject ,1 . e to the revised boundary review process; 2) A system of fees for the filing h F ` of proposed actions; and 3) Payments for the costs of a contested case ,'f 'e. -A? i `uz review by the party initiating the case. a F B. The transfer of the boundary review function to Metro should include Y all current Boundary Commission contingency and capital reserve fund . , z, , t - balances, files and equipment. The fund balances were estimated to be , bd n s' $52,482 in FY 95/96. 0 ~ a I Y u _ -z 6 f 3S b t t$ a~a a}_ .."`L r> -r. r,+»-- r,F^.: ^=..a•~s..^ :z-Ar",:•,•.. ^~a< r..~i~aQ ~,rr r z + d ~N t Y Y F 6 _ G1 +.wP,.43 - ,,,,,r- _ , J-;,V~ ~,i4l,! - , 4 sC - _ -f r X' s "s ~ 3 { f # , Y _ -k - - - ' ! , - f 3 5 k - - r r a*4r e s n s ~ L - r , . r , , . ~ T 4-. - I or , I . , 11 . 6 - - - w y - y _ - F u s;. shy t ~ e 9 717171 -'r t t ti +ffi~t~ ~r i~ - t Y F s yt 4 4 - ~ j iy t f 1' l f F 1 Sett. r a M 3 yr LY~ ~~I lt~~U11G~ ~YPSPr1~Q~T~$l1 - CD/~6 '77 7-7~ 1,7 tc~ 31 ~..:r f k i is c Tt t r' Is tr Ir., Jrva v li. Ji{r • •~If z I,I f I t I r R s I 1`~ I } I io a} i. ~ I _ 'or f I I INSURANCE k ('i ~ ~E,t r Presents: F , ; ~s4 N L 14 E AIND S u i S MANAGEMENT SERVICIEd a.a June 18, 1996 r r~ 7-7 q ; _ .~i!L ¢ .sj•y, ..u~ 7777777 77 7,-~, 7-777777 1 ~ t _ :r 4' ~ 4~ _ e'f x hsk- ~t ,s 7t 't 4 'e r a S' t. v -7 h;.'/5`~7,~:;,.i',v~ t K,r .t t +"''C riT c r uo- v~ t- +r, cr.: t _ 3 t .yr Y LIB .4y?.sdh 1 i' tr - A 1 ' L." . u. r. { a y' S. ``r'.vse .a'.7~~~^`<°G;'<,5 .;•`N.s..;'•.F..>; x•'~'°.-::^', -y ~ep~y~` -yr :7 4 ns~. 777 7 7 7 SS I+ i.r a +-1_1.iylf_._.,~'.+ k t f s r II c x i f ..r i - .I. {y r r r l r I 1 I .1 F I.; B L&K N S U R A N C E" l `r ` Established in 1870 , Oregon's Oldest and Largest Independent { i - } 4 1 Y Agency t l Property/Casualty, Workers' Compensation, a and Employee Benefits f~ Employee Owned ~i - 4 r f Specialists in Oregon's Public Sector i F 1 Marketplace ~ 4; j ~ a o f 1. r a ~ L~ s V I ~11,~ a t r. . 1 t y n ~ a•„S C t'~ 4j s ~ _ 1 5 I _ 1 r "77777- - L°, dlf y. J r I 1' N' ;i Iti x _.,le I d 3 1y 11, ',t 1 ( , J 4 r rk 1 IS T7 I 777777777777-7- t' f4 dt°, i rll , JBL K PUBLIC ENTITY DIVISION I f f Insurance Team - I 5 ~L1 { ~ llr ' CITY OF TI CARD Y. OREGON rf e Ron Graybeal i f. f CPCU, ARM r Division Manager Team Leander - i r Ted Ferguson Sandy Suter Gary Christie, ARM Chuck Floberg Phil Dollar, ARM Mary Shelley, COI1N k V, Account Execulivc Customer Service Risk A1gmt. Admin. Employee \\'orkcrs' Occupational health ;q + Back Up Representative Team Leader Renelits Cmnpen!',ation Consultant t'A k Grace 1lfaguire Jan Young Laurie Nichols ti [ + i Claims Custpomer Senice Custmer Service Re resenlative Repo resentahve 77777777777 1 l : I ~ Y a - ~ c x, , t J v + xr.r. ^~yt .v-,+~.'k` Y" ".^!.r,- f r..+-~v, -^'r"^.,` i '._t_~ ~;r^~.r*w•- ..c-~- `I~,?E'vi' ~"'•ei+''' 0~ Q f 4 F ~ 1 1 -,;t1 - ~:1.i ~ 1 h 'S' alv7 ~ ~ m II I L.1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 u ~,f - - . t t r~:i•-... ~1~ , I _ _ _ ~ _f... I .~VU. :,2.rs3 . •S~ w .i,.a _ .,6.., { J f T7 E 1, c f 4r - - _ - 77 77 I IS - - - t t ~ i B L&K a - l N S U R A N C E i.f A ent of Record for more than 30 9 ! Public Entities, including:' - Multnomah County rt - City of West Linn - Bend La Pine Public Schools Aa G Multnomah Education Service District y+ „ - Clark County, Washington $1 • ~ I r . + i I- F ~ - Metro ( 1 { k I 1 n .4 t r s {d`; L v rrl +S 1 r li +F 1 r h ! E F-6 aaY , . ''`a 1 ' 4 E i h 4 Y ly-Jw k r 07,5~7 s, 4 h r rt ~t .Y~ 6' y. • 1 - r t r B ~ { I L&K I N S U R A N C E Ifl - "1' - -I - " r?y a.; o* Relationship with City of with City ®f j Tigard since 1991 r j~ Risk Management Services SL.- ~ Ixesource f x r , t 77 k r 7777777777777 L _ } f,t Y r !t -3v"I'~uP ~fi ~l r y 'V 5", ~ ~~MMMM ~ - C „ t„ 12 i` ILL t S ' {'?"•r.~..y.-„,-_,'+r'~y "a'i' 'fit -"t"^'Ty `r_"g""";~ -~"m""•". +t~•c r.'~31-^'TS-74'm---•wm-ems'' - Y r f..- r I r! 7 Y X96+L~~ 41, - P r .s r 3 P 11 t r r ~ SE VICES PIS®V IDED BY: , j, t ! y a' I B LK S U R A N C E fr ~ F ry a `'~u ttrG F _ Risk Management Research and Support t r. 1 j 1 Occupational Health Nurse Consulting l" Actuarial ConsultingY h ~ I Self-Insurance Planning ; Insurance Placement and Analysis ar Building Valuation's Y f _ Internet Communications z ` } I t ~ I cr u E t u _1 1 I f C,. 2 11 4' i r 77 t TR^'~ T7~q!a~.'~ ^~f' en'C,-- ~"Ij"fi^ 7r ~w"'r'm^+^'+'+^T'~~!'~m~'t.`~.I 1 p ie It ~j4i sr ^s I' II kq. 13 5 All ~i - ,y" 'I 3 k ~ E'.,• ' S.II,1 ,.1.~t ...,I{ lrJl f 'ty r-~. -'.~I ~ ,r . 'd~; i.. ~ e dr _._,..,,1 t .w ,1... ,~..n~~.nr i :,r..L..,,~~.~_, iu ~...~,,.(1.,.. I,d.y~ 11..,C~; ...J,. _v.__....t _•..a.a ,S,I~c tt 'irf C , f (-nl `eaoeeWN~ t~la,~a.~m'~'n ~ +eea&n 777777777 A 7r _ h J P ~4+ 1P t{ i . } _ I Jj a Jat 'Sr C r4 rRorl"ERTY/LIABILITY INSURANCE ALTERNATIV03 - } [;j o Northland Insurance/Zurich Insurance- Combination ert o Reliance Insurance Group 1 ` R r , t ; ® City/County Insurance Services k y ` ® other t ~ .f r , ` r i e. r ~ J t, I ` a ( , - a 'z, ~ „at ~...Pr t~lY r2 (art '1 P'.t sr,r fi, a ,t r ,v 4 'G"'_.:., 77 [ l r ~ , ~ . I [ 3.t1 ~ f r k- t d,'t- IQ -7.- 77A r < Fit 4 I 7 ~ .12 - -`-.mil'-r...~.,-,. -7 7P pvl ivy 01 k'r 1. k l t z a I ,k F{ WNROARINKMERS' COMPENSrx 417 • - - 1 ht, E J INSURANCE ALTERNATIVES w 'I - o SAW Corporation ` o Liberty Northwest a o City/County Insurance Services x4E , Y. t ®®ther 6 A 3A LJ~ 0.0 s~ f- 7777777 77777' 77 ~~7, VIA, two mostly N r t' OR A f, !1 -t.. ,.,.y »_tn,rr J t. Y a { i f» S-. lq L3 _ t. - _ _ + b 'J~.~, •g5=;;A~.v''" ~i.~ ~5- t' 4t 'ter .I y • „ i 3 ~ 4 - j. r_; ~ - ~T TI^"+'^T~M.•'.f~.~ ~-T~r~r--.w•. p+~~'~' •4 A P 1 I~ .~,5'... + e ,..y,. g -tr ~41r , 1. i ":I','.7 r 77 _7 777~ it 4 ` - t t r ' 21 4 F F, 3 CS k E ~ - ~ E ! 1 I t 1 7, d f G• p 1, - _ 1~ t 1 I I y If fi 4 z a } ~ t. , Qt, CC ! EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INSURANCE If ' ALTERNATIVES Y t. Full Carrier Access Including: { 1a Standard Insurance Company f t Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon Kaiser Permanente r ! 1 E ~ E fit' `T~ pr, - rTT- r C ,;.i. Ire t Il [ r{{i-` 77 k- r , 771 - 777 I ~ C . 41y~ t ~ 1 } -1 1 Iv,,;4 i .1`y C x~}.. d I 1 +1'. C'T"_",.. ^t°„I^ ~+.1,'r"~C ^T..,i•~•.e_- . ~7~,1.~'^~*"'r",""!,' ti--- ~^-...-r-..~. 7777-7777' y..~..+rt~....•.,,,~- t~~..6. -r~-.c~~.-'f'• , _ !6~ _ r 'Il jl ,4. t , ~I 1 } t t a.msw.YlutL .~.iy':3eSiK».r~ '-"+dmrrawYwuwdwiuaitww9eumdS.3'ni'«1.,6+aA~J~kid usu.'uyle rt2au.iiwWa. - _ - w~ - CITY OF TIGARD i. - - r - i ars, u PREMIUM tP < t> BREAKDOWN j General Liability x Automobile $47,918'' $52,384 X { 4 - "y ~ - y I,I 11 ^ y R r ; Property Umbrella 4 $371246 $19,604 Pollution" 4I, f. k $3,073 ttsi 411 i Workers Compensation I. 1 $154,826s i t. r' - I. I) 7 r t ti s ~~r 1; J ° r 1 n i3` ( S ti _ k 1 f r 41 f ~ L tE J 3 i 3'' eE r h t }r P 4~= " r w~ S E 77 `r 777777, [ s 1 k INSURANU 101 - UABIM 3 Ei f 3 ~ a TM - 1 r ! ~ 1:'+{ Who is Insured? r ' `I r What is Covered? What is Excluded? . x ~ = G r r ly r ry t ~ 77777 h i J J 1 I a l r J - jf; C z rr a k -k,r ~'w,rdr•~,ty, er t r r, y l~ ;3 r;ri r' 4, aiw.,~yo~..~•o ~:~'Ai•1.i ~ 'r'f', s, . IJr''1- )r I' J -:;r~ 'e 1 E= c• ki } Y ~''$w; < ¢rt ~_y r 7' ~r ! ^'E r-vs~•~_nwimr--, . ire-'^^+-~^.^^ 1 f ^ 'T'^^, 7.'_'°""'~`'i-0r~ ~ ~y ti I r ® ® ~ , - ,u~,' y s If;N ~ r ~ 1 •:i ~ I^'-- II' ~ x ~~i.k r •>z rt Y U~ I 1.:. ® ~r{ 1 5 ~ i .r 't ; r 1. .1:1.51 -l 1 .!I_{ r, t r`i J 1f= L ~ ~''I',. .r^ k4 ,a("' a: n fi~ ~ _ I rFl' 1 .a1:="~:. „d ; I(; E r gal''. _ }'t r - 1 ~2 ! ~i; t i, .✓rl ;'a r w'~ J.. 1 .:t<.1. ~ !',~~J;.~ ~~e t f T. EE r } - r z .r .f r• J r I.. ; . t.. -5 ;~i}'.y r. ~,7 yddy e r 1 J':9i t I la 1r F ..:?4, X Ik' ~ r i K ) ,I ^ 1 WHO IS INSURED"'? E ~ i~ ll~ t7 Q The City of Tigard All members of the governing body T 1= f All boards or commissions ~r l o All elected or appointed Officials (Scope of Duties) All Employees (Scope of Duties) x r ~ r f,. s o All Volunteers (Scope of Duties) `l F ` "Additional Insured" by Endorsement N - t r s C' f' L ~ } V ~ I l .t `~e?J.' `"T` ~'--•~."I'4~n•-, F"1,.~`A"~"i +'r r~~y A s, p ~ ~ ® 0 4 f ~ y+l ~ 3~ f ti~ II t ::r •~~{G 1 y {II r~,.'it + 4~if•. ~ ; y~_I:'~1 4~d ~ J rY(~en 7 h . ~f F ~ { IRW : f ~ ~F ( ^mwrR I r 1~ I l ~ ~ ,L t t, p u a~ he sP ~ cl p'~ WHATIS r; a o f.. two Bodily Injury i r Li _ 6 X19 , " Property Damage{ Breach of Duty ` Negligent Act, Error or Omission } ► Law Enforcement Operations r <i a f Including Cost of Defense Settlement at Company Discretion iiv 771 k ` 0t 777 r . F r T'* ,`.e f p .~.~...a« '"n." - ""`c--: I ""y'"; L"rr"! r--~71^' 7--~s ""'^,pn'~I"~^~ '`r p r yn 1 I k;~~ ti ! G' t+ r r iP~: 1 a , ir' t ~II 1~ k. 1 :I~'. n s~^~"i~t it ar,.{ 1;S4zr ~ , {3 I f, 177 RECENT ACCOMPUSHMEMM Significant Coverage Improvements a a, ` Increase Earthquake Coverages to $7,000,000 y} 41. ` Decrease in Flood Deductibles ($25,000)' sµ ® Rate Guarantees }'l Staff Training Sessions Enhanced Statutory Compliance Training Appraisal of City Properties r ' P ( C€ 1, _ _ z I 11 777777777777 I + y 0 R k? 4 a F a : , ~ I { ~ .i~ I ~ 1 I 1i y ~.P n j s.~ _y r 5~ . W.. r I 1 - `.S f-~ A 1 ` 1 i i y 'VI T~ L # 4 f Fi. ' 77 y, :i I : t FUTURE PLANS r A Risk Financing Option Analysis AAA < EmptoYee Benefits Plan Review f~ Self-Insurance Funding r r 11 S 777, Y l ] {3 ~I I { t. _ f 4 tly5 1 Y;-,425 f 4 ~ W F l t t ' 'l, xfl `T 5 r y t9 h ~J 'rr'/ r?^L t - r E~I I y i ~^r~~x~r~4 }"~'~v,~-~..I'~-•r<s-'?.~r~~rn I,~ ti I "rs*7,. .I~ ~ ~ 1I' I F , , ~ E { + i ~ ':1 ~ r ~ ! ,aq y t Itcy il.,~ SS s 71 - kl -r:, i T1 .z T J L ~Y lh k 2'Y NI 4. i- P ' LLJ z4 1 L _ ry ~ ry xY i ? ~ f 5- E F y r ~ F f wA --^t-~-T.Cw_'wr~• "^~c ~„~r,_,_ ..t.~,~r~srln - P_ . sa - - - . - - - 4 F~ ,s{ a f` F .d, ' ~-h Ft t' _ q Y - t~ z r 3 , - . t x ,,k't z - 11-1 Fey .''M - l € F _ C -M . t e-: L ~3~~ a _ ? \ ytwc.........-........_........-....» v.._ _ c.sr..-.aa~.an~~+=... .,....._-_»x......,.-l s _ §tt - - z 3X r Agenda Item No. T i t `_4, t€~d - L: Meetingof - !8P(p' 65 ~1 ; Council Goals -1996/97' p _ ` } - L r- - x, -t t i - r4„ i, e "gs_", _ Listed below are the Council goals arid the ti~inelines established by the City Council and s z staff earlier this year. We have made substantial progress on some goals, while others _ti 1 5 - 4 - are ongoing in nature or are "standing by" because of timing or staff availability. Status 3 reports on -Council goals will be scheduled quarterly on the City Council Workshop 3 'tea,' r Meeting Agendas during the following months: June, September December and March. ~ ;T J > Council Policy Areas Ye r r i3 `4 } April 1996: Participate in Youth Center Study (of private interest groups), l w,;z~ a s, ~~P consider the results, and determine City position on developing a youth center. - > n { Update (June 1996):.. The. Youth, Comm ttee is in the process of ~ - forming community .focus groups to. get more .information from the g } - a r- 1 community. They are considering a pilot project. ~ _2 ~ ~ , , I ~~`~,',:,'_'WR - April 1996: Improve media relations. ~I - mot{ :Z ~ Update.'(June 1996). Plan is to meet with the, nempapers, .television t ~ and radio stations to determine the type of stones they would be interested . in covering After those meetings; W Newton will:ttevelop a calendar of story ideas for the next year The goal is. to have the calendar dev@topcct ,_4 ' ? tiy.July 1: tW r ~k as,~n I -1 rl § r~ - .51 May 1996: Resolve the issue of authority and areas of responsibility for the I 11 Planning Commission and Citizen Involvement Teams. ~ , l 3 Update (June 7936): Policy was submitted for Councit: review. The Planning Comrriission. and CI'Ts;are currently revtewPng the policy _ ~ ~ p -_,,s r k r G~ f- i £..i4 r_-: r i i - - 1 d ri t { m -1 y ' City Council Goals 1996!97 -Page 1 x M i ! l Y j tft .1 L - Ir, p t r 7 i - -1r9v~ R - H" - ' _ } - - t _ ! Z" k - , 3 - - - 1 z ~ In ~ - - ' 4" ~ ~ . r I I . ~ , ~ _ r I - I . r I ~ ~ , j : ~ 2 ~ ; R } t 's k{kC' F~ - iT3 - JS.-n... :t .1..,..~~z._ -..fL _ a, - , _-~...u .v _ _s.- 4.. c__-_~.,tc-a ..__s .c..~ .r ._1 e.--~.s...L. r~_ y.__u. Z r~YrRF . l _TV -7771T~ S - June 1996: Develop long-range and short-range space plans and evaluate funding alternatives. i t Update (June 1996):. The space:. committee is in. the process of } evaluating whether or. not our current site can accommodate facility growth over the next 20 years. We have.reviewed departments` initial estimates on " r future. parkins needs and determined that it is necessary to reduce parking d _ needs. The nent'step is foir departments to reevaluate their parking needs 112~7 M, and meet within the next two weeks to make a final decision on What growth _ can be accommodated on site. In :the. short term, Jirri Hendryx is ` £ =rv developing' a' plan for city hall to accommodate the new, hires anticipated a ; after July 1 m aS July 1996: Conduct Charter review for November 1996 election. a-_ r 111 Update: (June 1996): Scheduled: for Council discussion on June 18, 19961`to: consider whether Charier amendments should be _ placed.on November ballot. „i ! f - September 1996: Develop long-term computer system (hardware, software). Provide public access to information. Et 3-11 < r ate, a~f -'4i Update:. (June 1996): Comprehensive Plan is being written and will be presented to City Council in September. r ~ September 1996: Develop a plan to address the problems of Tigard's F homeless. S 4, n f ~ Update (June. 9996): Council update `and discussion scheduled for f~ f the workshop Meeting of July 1 e 19964 r M, 1 - September 1996: Finalize long-range plans for Cook Park. T tpz Update June 7996) Consultant, selection process is underway "and s~ Public "Involvement and Task Force meeting will "be, scheduled over the coming months: :3 t a l City Council Goals 1996/97 - Page 2 F 'T T7, f w~~ t t -,T 7 r F S -..emu - _ -77 7, PPP 1 Y - S4 - - - - - - tF Pu,~ r. ~ U - November 1996: Explore the development of an Employee Wellness 4 Program. r ' Update (June 1996): Staff has been gathering information . on other wellness' programs to assess what are the more useful and. popular f elements generally being: made available to employees. Staff is, evaluating ¢ r employee newsletters and developing questions to survey our employees on what program services or elements they would find most beneficial. I _ January 1997: Integrate Council into City Computer system. Update (June 1996): Purchase of computers for Council was placed in the proposed 96/97 Budget. Staff will `contact the Council to.determine where jo,begin with the computer installations and: to coordinate tra'::Wing where desired. a i i r h - June 1997: Conduct Visioning process. E ~Y 1 ~ y ! ,ff~RY i Update: (June, 1996): Council approved, proceeding .with Visioning on t May 28.: Staff contacted Lewis and Clark and Partland: State University regarding. interns and expects.to hear from these institutions, by June 17. k Staff also contacted DLCD and Metro regarding possible grant money,fdr r T f the citizen involvement portion of the process. The Tigard Tualatin. School District will also..be involved. ' Staff:wil{ rneet on June 11 to;discuss the consultant - what we need and the selection process. ~W Ongoing: Consider issues of affordable housing. ? Update. (June 7995) Council and staff have supported the efforts of i the Cominunttv_partners.:for! Affordable;:Hotasing: The Cu;limun ; Development Department is compiling information on community housing i codes for review with City Council at the July, 16, 1996 workshop meeting.` j City Council Goals 1996/97 - Page 3 € i d ~ o { ~ f ter r F- i as r k ~ _ Yt r' v- - - - - - - - x C, ~3 .~...A......._.......~~..... -..__..._.-.-.-.....~.-...~,..a..LV....isY....,....~...J:»:~.wzssmr+un+ew_..-...~......__ ~ _ _ _ k I t t 1. -tr > Transportation/Planning/Development 3 H 3 - July 1996: Develop Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington T s County for areas in Tigard's Urban Growth Boundary., Update (June 1996) Discussions ; continue. on levels and types of services, Attorney's office is drafting Intergovemmental Agreement Citizen involvement under discussion. - September 1996: Develop a neighborhood traffic manageient program. ° "V Al Update (June 1996): Citizen's Traffic Calming Committee is expected -k . to complete their initial work in September.' Staff plans to update Council in October, , ' - t ~ - November 1996: Complete Triangle rezoning & transportation elements. S } (Includes Toolbox, design, transportation system, multi (mixed) use zoning. k- etc.). z r U ate June 1996: Consultants. have been'hired. Task, Force is being appointed.. Public`invotvement process will 'occur through summer rg F and fall. r K r - November 1996: (was May 1996; but moved timeline back in anticipation of new City Engineer) Update Engineering Fees to recover staff time spent f qfi , in development review process. tr ,,_x Update (June ?996): A fee increase: has been proposed. Staff is Wtirki^g ^i ii8 levlSton ZD the COrii~Uniiy~-D°veto r??8nt CRde to imalemdnt the fee change. This will require Council reviewand approval. t nr l: December 1996: Complete 99W analysis, adopt findings and design standards. ti Update (June: 1996); ODOT isnearing cornpletiori:. of the 99W/I=5 _ a corridor plan.:Work _on.g9W access. management plan has been deiaved: I Timeline should be shifted to June 1997. n City Council Goals 1996/97 - Page 4 i 4 4 - ~ i- j f ~ cJ i 4 ~f ps ?tea k a - - s _ y 7 C , v . d 7'- 1 -3 - - - i - -,i _ t,~' ;,I "P , , -~2 - - ~Kf- 'C 3 . ` - January 1997: Develop Annexation policy; especially for island areas. { } -7 1 a ;3 - - -4 t -y r Y - z~ yr' ~ Upda(Jane 1996). Staff. has begun to forrnulate policy to : be ter' M [te resented to the City Council per timeline: t~ x 3 - June 1997: Evaluate use of traffic, calming devices for SW North Dakota M, 3 7y 5y ( M - y - " I -1 Update (June 1996). Plan is to collect additional data to add to traffic ~ ' ~ 4M 7 ' information previously collected. k " - June 1997: Rewrite Tigard Development Code. f ~ 'c ,a„ ~ ,k I Update. (June.1996): 1996-97 budget includes funds to .complete this u' k, ; work, Work will be, initiated this summer. _ " , . `L - Ongoing: Define and develop Tigard's approach to working/dealing with ~ ~ ~ , y Metro. ,t W , " , ~ i Update (June 1996):. ' This is an ongoing process , that is being ~ Y ~~K~ ~ tr developed through the 2040 process: k #'at ¢ a ` -Y ~ t , - . 3 ~ ~a > Long-Range City Service Areas a~ } . r - June 1996: Develop City's direction `t -the Downtown Area. xa -x ' , t `,t Update (June ?996): Staff needs to push this. Timeline back. A . { ^ - 3 meeting has been ' scheduled .during June 8f. staff fo_ meet- with : a ~ ~ r4 w representative of the Downtown Merchants Association- , ° `rte - - October 1996: Develop a long-range plan for development and ~ ~ ' W_ maintenance of city streets. ` L ~ 5 ~ ~ Update (June 1996}: Staff plans to begin work on this: goal to rrtid- k 1 summer. ! _ j ~ i ' ' t ' C Y 1. K kb L d .r 1 r A r , Y 2 G F_ fl~ City Council Goals 1996/97 -Page 5 k ~ _7 { 11 x` 5 - , ' - a' ~ 2 - J " a> id E t t- 4,, 4 r t 3_ T, p { _ -A.h,. yF- -d { T' Y - - - } P t , . , ~ 2 . / - _ _ =1 4._I ..c_. _..Y sir .a- _ _..r _ r_-.- .__i...e'_~ ~._...._._t_ _`_'-.'il':_.- si._ _I- ~_~_...a x v"_ _ _.~:_r1_e } -'S- lYSM1~§ ~-~a ~ •___.w_,..ra....n..~.,.+-. .__...-.rv...._ _ .._.~.......r.~»..e.wxet -..,....~.e....A......v.v_ i. t _ - t December 1996: Investigate feasibility of contracting for water meter reading (as model for comparing internal cost and contracting out). { + ' Update (June 199,6): Staff will gather information, during the summer z Y ® y months:: H i -azt a January 1997: Secure long-term water supply (contractual arrangements with Lake Oswego, Portland, Tualatin Valley knrwter District, 'Willamette River partners. (Note: by April 15, decide where to buy water in short term.) Update (June_ 1996). Tigard entered into an agreement, to.buy_1 mgd 3 y of water..from Portland; staff continues to participate in the fegional staidY to . rr~e look at 6iher. options.such as the willamette River.8taf€ aril Murray Smith r t ` x ~ & Associates will present options to Council at the Work Seslyle. sion of Ju January 1997: Review the City's Street light policy. f ~ A Update (June. 1956): A map showing, alt street lights has been4 E prepared: areas with deficient lighting will be identified., June 1997: Create a sewer extension program. k 5 a rn Update.(June ?596)As a result of. responses to the announcement rt rte, of this program :from the owners; in unseweied areas :about; three 'tiigh» priority , project have been identified and detail pioject plans are being 1 x developed.'. Construction of at least:one of those -J-;;--6+s cxpeLied:Uy ' early,fali. Ongoing: Promote use of Metro Greenspaces funds for the Tualatin River ' w t and Fanno Creek. €5 3 M -MAW sa fi C 3 Update; (June 1996):: - Staff is 'actively involved in Metro's selection; #a 2,1 process for properties of regional significance: 1 3 . City Council Goals 1996/97 -Page 6 i:. f t ~J r {r ? f 1~ [ 3 T'- 4 r t 1 f t I L ' 1 - " l fff ~ 'l a i..t. rte. K.~:' a _ J. 7 .t:~ '•Ly'is +r'`a"-' :+te •,S.ts ^<iT"" rf~-,r 3 KYi "r5'-. e~;.kv. "i.l, ,sr•^J `%.di ^ . 3 Lx q, }.e s• yt 4 N .r k -'3 ="'S4• g~ soft x , Y ` ia'1 . {,tr a$ ss .~t* , -r r,- .W:. 7 cif+r. ,r_, • t• , :,•hv r ~Y " °4'. t ~ .T . 't`E ^>9'~ re° w:r:%`r', rt I .n ".G•. J 5°fi "ew 'r .'Y t 5 . . a~ • '3. ? ar iz, r, ~ ,A r t. r v ~i.:c,. P.+'t .=,R .J, • r n+ , ~ s ~ ...t~1 1~ ' Y r r.~9~.~,. ~•<''•.~r~,:~_ t`e:, ~ =n:.^'-:fir ,i,. ~ t < >,s J 4 „r~•'. f.~ a-' r, y.-,~ .k1 g':c~ .2' s" r, n ~ ,rr° w• N~i'``~i a'a°:. "at .e,, t 1. r `~``+r- ':+':.w t'r,i, e ~ Y:M. +c r,.. " ^,r-s:+~; .d . li>f'^ ~tt3• ,~y , ,w u - k`u rse:».. h d.t~ "K"<§~', v r!~_ k d'- m a5. .3 ,r^y;'}- r=-F:~ . hr.,- .t' ' t :i x` 1.,.p .rr.S(::`->r.7 n r xs." z . r.k: •4, , ,r''0.. , _ -1 - ,nPx :+i3'> ~".59,5. „d. ° -,i yp.~^ •t~"^~, - ..a1 - .,r a `ay:;TM=, .ar,.i'a^i +.4r:= ~~5 ,•5 a!^ SCr- as!"' n- . , ~ A-,.,,.... "f . ~~:X , rc 1 . < 'k~ ~ ^ P ,`»%~r .+1 rrr, -x, - >C >a'v 4 r<.of : ~"L<' w•Y" ,r, v, ~k '~3a, : t. .c kd. e e`;.L ?!-€i:=k+, .,H',`'ac,•rg nN'Y~. •5 F , J; a~• w-3'~r, y a:` ,'i x7. u"v;+,-,:sue. ~ U ~„f;'r,"d~r ,<.,'.s,, r•„ i•:,r~. "t, rrv-`rxn. e v, a `i „'S"~b"''i+ S''ih.. 4„ r'r'X' ' •r! ~ :'4'~ " r 3k . f: , i' .k'. Y4. d - 'j t aC•a +`,°iy{a.'qc.., xe:..A'x r.4 '°T ..E r .¢-.d ,i l"' n"'N n :x:Y, ar"t.~v~': :"-J. ,;i.. . a J^°;!a"^,!'C""v`• ~j'a '^g• ~rvy ~ r .1 ~ s~"'+.. ~ `~;b . sn: ~ 'r'Y.~ - ,>~_•4 . „-fi`r; sa . f ' .,.§4; 3€C"a " r,. +~r' ~'3 C d ,''!'ea .:f.F,.'`+"•s c.c a`^,ti. [•r: d: r,- ,.7. n -..3.-r ai.~1.e+S v.i•. {i:y v4 _ .."24r.~",v Y-~ t ,.b'rat'` +i- J7`r>. '^`~^J'k''."^"•3 `''n~ ^"iT a< a ..t. 4'R, is ..f "'',,y.~, ''.g „+M' r n. 4,,Y. .1 ,5 a .GS'u'," 3. ~°'S„'• ia:a`, 4. , - ~ '.f. t 9,r ,~'"-kra3" : ~ t<"'°~. x':5 , , ~ ."r,,~ti.'.a , L< ~ .~rm'•,f "':iw z1 s • r46.~,., L~„ kW„ ' ~M ; f - _ ,i^E"~. F kY . R k ,F.•r 't,'e'`rS s,•'`a. v^;' 'is, L, •.'""~t. ^ a, _ . `~'M , i4), n-r .,,3 t s °`q,;:p, e t' ,,;.iS Ju °.4' ~u 44.: N: eV~~: r:'J'. ' uy» vr': • ,.5r :fir' •1 ''C''r`,{ "A'r r',, rlw ~a,_ •,L . ."k "•"~:f , F ~ r'HY' <'N ~ % ~`=I,. 5t• ( w,it. °syrrl, t 'if a ° .J -,1"f • ~ S'# _ +i` F s +b'r n . 1, 'vi'i ~F i ' 1 f k g„kya. k. r+ m.'><,- ale . a.•:. a` e "Fr. 4 i S!,. e It A! 9MARMS ~ ar` "s. ~ , k"t m w .,c •r„ _ .rs~.r ~t . x ~ r. X, ,r"1'=, '?tl' ~ •.r , e-h, ire x$ r'K ,•"a: .•§r. ri., S1 '"i't.^k t,,,c C, x,~':y s,r .vr-. 7- LLs , -qq +rw ?rv • r N T evf'.'.r` psi, ~ 4[" P°+ •'alsi: . .'tom ev e.a~= .r. is s h^i ~9k. „ _,.L''' i ~n ..t X. A r'1%7',. v C- f .?a `Ly. „i • _ •xµ5, i~ n 1 e•. f.:` ,^t a . ..a, r"r. ,u. . .,,r ,-:..-t...,.rp; "^-,e w:y,",?", a;i" I': ~ ry, ..1 -S..h a. cs ,.`t ..G ,f e" t_,, < t. , a. . o,.i T, - .k~tx "t Y'a`4:,'•'r, ,re. •f." . ? , i. , k":' t :t '^4';'t;F'r e.-4. . ?r .•.-Srx,_ ,rk,x, a~.r '7"... ``C:a'F' vt1' L v 11 a x t t .t ' ~ + s ~ ~~•l~ Y"" -.;F; a~+~?,, • s'_ - :~,~d..t,ut ,VJ'.r~>r~'a, E -tt + Tr 1 ky Y~ rk w' t'.,r'. f': Nrbu4,nl~`Y Clfe'`~-kJ~~,z ' t? Sx r', - s ON t€"`",; F S k! - Y d °i,' S M fa 1 t ^ w } F l t r -ssa 1 _ /1k-<a "eE e ~fl.~,nS,ry sic I x Shop 414 r~ jgf~!>1 dat' 1 ,t - L ' ; C ~ 1 s ~ il~ct a~ mt FS'~ ; !~1 = r ' '>3 r ~ [ ff ~ 'i nb C O ~3 z t ,.a of •7. O• 1 3 x-i ...3 (Q CCL wry.` F , ! li 10 maim P" g: E 1 ~r ' L~. fD~ C , L t v n: 'o ~ 4 SD ID COD a t f t -SW 8S , , ,r f O~ ~ 2 ;1 ' , n C13 0 ~ v 4 ~ m r c "now ' -0 - W .Z: f r All t t (fl' i r i~ t t r.. k ~ r ^ k 3 a Ty, : k A { i ~ 1 ~ ~a ,s d sr - r w ? 9X y a„y rr / Y1I § n AS OWN ~ - ak %Y § t y rz"tic r„1t ~Fy2 .+y ~d~+E`iG''U'^ t,fi, n5.'~ S~1 ! ! rr s~J a a. 'r, '3,' I-, ? a,z >r 1'.r - m.•o»;,~.-.. c4.. °r '`.t H, 'a,~'"i='°.i~ w, 1 ^'•k" fi' lR 'a,^. ,d'Y ._af x~.k~st~i> ai: L`Y'k+ 'Y i.~? .„•.n....-~^'9- d. z R.~y,[" _ ^ •rra,' ♦ ,::da"` x _-'F 3'..-u"'?*• 4 «t e , rr.,+ t «.x:17, ,~.gg ~'''r'~t<- r^ wF.. .C . n Y• ,'.4';Y {r. x'. ~.1- '~2nn Sk "vj ,v,,,j+ ,d.,, ,>;,~x 'F u;a}.7., 0.r,v ;Ir h„Xm' y 'fal" iC?v,~4, ,:.yh~ c '°s ~t r , "~xt 1 q ,q`•a4+.. { S ~d',A.e;- A.' x{''Yrv. a.S a~ gg `,q. .r„r .rl r. . ek1' , 'E` }a. .a : 'k,•:•s t :-•9. W'~ reF.., f}~,^.. ~N e r . r~. Yi'p'-•a '.1'~ v9F+> ~ -.:...r.,,, , t. , t } a ".rte d 'N .t ~ _.-.r .v c, rz., >v., n t: z. a n. ,~L 'wC,F'~ f~9r.~•« ~4`~`a ».•;~?k , E"" s,..:.. ` r ~•..b r a i9t k' +'x, -05`x, ar ;}a•G . 1 - ~ s:•~ , ~ . ~7 ~ ;s• ?,.y I .,r . ~ .~s~_. ~ , . ,r+^s. eT>.. M,. , .~Py~.., ,_R _ _,.ys : '7:rr .,r. .^p .k "'i•:;: - t...-., - .au_g r z .,r 'ar 1, „ .:p tw k~,..,_~a!",: -u.,4a~alf.a' G?"',r~ e~•'!,- C. ~r is ^5" '!c ra } - .rX. ?;_'~,,uf,r F X1,7,5.,;.., :4° .,r"i x x4 fe- ~ $ $ ~ •Y . ~w s' r ';a'he•«_ >P ' :k. "fr„ "•V' ~•?.F _w>~ . ,:'2;'t, .r t, ."^L=' .'~k ki 1•S. ~ 'M .J Y s'~ ~k~.s r:b1• ~dS s„r!. ,.t. -r r.~',~ s'~' . r . raa, .i^Y, M~` , ca „it , a.° , ~a'"r,. t•:~+,• A - f , x • i, M,,grr e, ~ ,•e r~,.`` , ~ -•~a ~ ,w `ma'r t}`~ ,Cri...-'. . '>;,y! t" r v ?akr; 4 ~4 , r?+'d t !t 'a , s .a+, t'•~ , ^ "!?e "f 'k„ w. " , Y '4` ~ ,°.d t w "r- . r 'x~.. r'~`•e r:t rr ~ „"s - >d', ~;.~-,1.'~'^. ' , ra `'~„~a at ~ r"H'~3i. "z .4 , .x :r.+: w•,, r~ - 4. :+'i"r ~ e, a+3'`S~cd;, r'u ' ^~w "k.,w.4s I? WOW". _'3 , a.,i. n "`4'^.pS ~ ,.3E_ s'•',,,:. :.yrr =M .^.a ~a1. •-•~ie k .,`fir, 3,:t - ~ ' sh..,4: t, r , 3' ° ni,+, t*• . N 7 ~ ~..'Sfi"r: 'p 1'~°~,'r '~'n:rTxk: 'u r;'a~,~. t Ek x..., x .ca„ r- r .:Fv."°3,,. "r .tk>r u, E,;Y . r rrSC _ ; >3 .,ro :a'.EMd?v ^C.`k t. k , b~• a, - «yx"y`,K x..t_. rrc`~'<^w N~q{ xcs-,~vs>',n "{r1>v s ry?: 2 1 * S v a :rr, .,4. f f. f. • . ~ F =:'S"' ;ta •'a y to ^~«vr*.. "'ys v° ~r``*, ;'r.=^~Pa'ua.'t" t7 r, >v3 v ,~yw^,.a s v . ,x ° . d .~xi'>i4• ,.ra;,. ; s'¢,J .n'"r< -sLL4 ~~~G~ ,'^~3 R'_ ...~ue 'rJ , ggi" j• r.9 . UN" ~,t x..I`",' l x T"~A c, .s'irtd. 1 { ,4'.°V~t, tt- + ^t'3~i'b °~4:•'"" Ji. J : 4 ~ 'Y,u M," R'+::we "4~ f 1 :Y y"ipi .W, 'Ff` .t:r' Y'-, .a M.x ,i ~ a' d.+ '•"'£u xa ~°°J'' Ya".' , t- g , f .>j ~Ix w Ca,`=' ?E'S :sNs~~'.. 4 .ro; ,s, " rFe 9 r'a:fi•, s,' )...;t?',..rc. J. x~5= ...i' c:tiL-•- .4° ''+.t„ r~? .6~ exr'E" `•',~iw tr_, 3r '.,.x3r,f„F " °e.~, s~'r-.fir.'°.$'•w•.k rt' , g J'. .rri"5 r , „kkyr.n~,v°- t,Yr •~~..`vn.s.;"%°~':4' § , ,t .'y+ •Sr` ' > ,y=iz ``9, . fta~. .r, ,t r, y , F ,•"'~i:~"`W„,,.; ,ra~.{~- 2-" 1,T lo-g •.w>~,r ~e°~`-,~ raw ,a, ^a : *f~ y~ .k,. a 5r" qr><r E' ' t . s s a<'>fi< ~ t^`s. a , sq r .YE `itnk`•'3 , t. S d'''S7'4 S.y 44~t r ,h'~': d: k3 a vr~,. •i s.,p E< u.. ~ _ „„p,+ i ~S , p 'r ` A.7:; , n-~ .iq, F r,r.- 7 }r, , >y vN-, , 6},S r F,° PS' e ' ; ,,,~~~y. : ,r'T``, ' .n ~Fi•,. `~t~4a. ':ti ,:'°N u}'.C0 P?+'s',:z`u,*w•~& . <'s= R t~E'7 .,a .•„",ky~~ st a, . # 4 d:•W ea J xf t ~ i%y,i,, "•I'ki aY, .'ii` ,.:a^`: a"„k',',t! .ci,r„"rh`r:;r; .e""r' .s,' ,,.i;, `S''''~°1a .j ^+i(?ex ,ea'S"°e P'`~;`~t+::.t";~ ^.•y .r r, '~r"„'7n~:' ~ 1~,~,5„r; -~d, t <ar.., z~~• `tx~: ` ~:a ~ z .s~ro ~ _a, i • "r~~., -,a "r, IN a ;fi~t-~'Y''' ,.ss ai'e'},,,,4nr;,'.'., 's @'£.rl„ fk>, R ~a"~+t t,i ,.,,<re 5S.f a, f A' 1 "Y..PYd"i§3":i "-°'a'-~^,: ,Y~. 4 t~ 'r-4,.m,, r'~3.. ~ ~ E t• ~'Wr' "'`#"2~±.^ ~ -.p i' .f 4~, [ ,"x,}'3,"3 ~~»~"P•*: f'*; .'F^ } £~7 ~~'r 4ry.~ a'~;'*'^- =;,w, 71:(r;~ ~',,:z<<S g~' `^t.,"*•C['''er` j ""3 Irk.-.I_ , t"*' .-..-c--r7~7 I t ' 'kt" f ~ T, E ~ T g~~11S~ ~ ® e a~ , 4~1 t , C , ; i F e ,..i~-,, it }SUi~' k rj"_ 9Fg'~It' a t :;r - 1[ 1, L '.I t ..I ~yr 1 1 h ,.t:, ~N t ,t,u f u y; t I,~ . - -ii l _.yr. 113 p a`~~ w 7 a 1?, rt: ,i "1y11 fir: To yy. ~ 5 ~~RR 1 i a ~,t'rl' I 6 r e Y. ru ' } '';s.,r3r --c^` 1030* A Mg SRI, - ? vmts51 n" 2 ~yF _ 1 -i 41 i r,, i-; -r r Fsz.3s lt..'sp [$~YCy~-*¢''s--4° .x '4 4FY L - - '3 - c- N-.># - ,g-fs~ta T• } 1 f t 1 G, _ i 3 'ice T'''J~P(,y - t Yz - Y. "`'pia nt- 6 t~ *0- i iKs~. f . MIN- o- ~ ql .~~5 „ x s AGENDA ITEM # 1x_w,$ u ~1v~ s s t For Agenda of rn 1 `d (2 61 - 07 - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Z3 M ' + COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY _ Eli, ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Discuss Charter Revisions w-f -tom, ; G PREPARED BY: C. Wheatley DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK_~/"~ ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL . t t { RZi, 1, s k Does the City Council want to proceed with a public hearing soliciting input on Charter amendments which would ~~v 3 ~ be forwarded to the Tigard voters? ' l- -g r b~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION g 3:, R Determine whether the City should submit Charter amendments on the November ballot. x rfi~" +3 4,,:_'h 5 na: Vk V, r c INFORMATION SUMMARY - g - A copy of the Charter is attached. Listed below are some areas Council may want to review: > s r 0 Page C-1, Section 3: Consider updating language to indicate Charter and up-to- „ date boundaries will be available at City Hall. z I ` e Page C-2, Section o: Consider changing the requirement that candidates fora r=~ -b Council office have to file for Position Nos 1, 2, 3 or 4. f • Page C-3, Section 14: Noted for Council review. There is no ordinance to ¢ "compel the attendance of absent members." sir V • Page C-5, Section 30: Consider updating or changing the "Oath of Office - ' E s-r Language." a'~y t OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED - 1. Do not propose Charter amendments at this time. r~ 1 2. Consider additional amendments. #+y = j k f'i ty*t`L`' k~ FC t FISCAL NOTES g ak; t}' Cities are not charged for measures during a general election. ~q z rt y 1;4 e +`r ~as< -ems a 1 } 44 xi"Y 4 h- f~.rL} e a vp gr ist r ? r _ - 3'}~e z,`~ k k i X t~ ~ - - - -f rf t A~ fr - . _,~'~"'-`-----ter""_.."' --°*.q^-••-~z~~...r'~i"_._^' _ V ^ 3 - - -1 k~+~axi~a E2 4 - - - f - - _ - 4'- ~ ~ .1:` - - F Q r - j /L ,k - s ,t I. a E, . TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE 4 1 I: ~ - I - t~ _~Y Chartax - F f CITY CHARTER United States and of this State expressly or Y ` impiiLdly grant or allow municipalities as fully as though this charter specifically enumerated y CHARTER of the CITY OF TIGARD OREGON each of those powers. x { xt Referred to the voters and adopted November - s z.- 6, 1962 (Amendments through May 1:, 1994 Section 5. CONSTRUCTION OF CHARTER. ' F i- Election) g -f-='1- - ;i Effective January 1, 1963 In this charter no mention of a particular power shall be construed to be exclusive or to a a Chapter I restrict the scope of the powers which the City , NAMEA.WBOUl~DARIES would have if the particular power were not F r ~~I",*._;, mentioned. The charter shall be liberally 4t- , Section 1. TITLE OF ENACTMENT. construed to the end that the City may have all z, ' r powers necessary or convenient for the conduct , v Al cz This enactment may be referred to as the of its municipal affairs, including all powers that W' Ta Y Citv of Tigard Charter of 1962. cities may assume pursuant to state laws and to , i i .1 the municipal home rule provisions of the state ,x fit,; Section NAME OF CITY. constitution. r vf-'= t - a , ---r- t r 3-4- U -X T The municipality of Tigard, Washington Chapter III f, County, Oregon, shall continue to be a FORM OF GOVERNMENTY P '_4 v Municipal corporation with the name "City ofz p+ a` Tigard Section 6. WHERE POWERS VESTED. " - - a Section 3. BOUNDARIES. Except as this charter provides otherwise, all , 1 r,~ ~ powers of the City shall t a The City shall include all territory be vested in the council. ~ 4 : t encompassed by its boundaries as they now Section 7. ,MAYOR AND COUNCIL ' t exist or hereafter are modified by voters, by ~ the council, or by any other agency with legal The elective officers of the city shall be a k , power to modify them The recorder shall mayor and four councilors who toether shall rk keep in his office at the city hall at least two constitute the Citv Council. At the general copies of this charter in each of which he shall election held in 1990. and every fourth year c q maintain an accurate up to date description of thereafter, a mayor shall be elected for a term of ; , F 1. the boundaries. The copies and descriptions four years. No councilor shall serve the city as . 11, shall be available for public inspection at any councilor for more than eight consecutive years, time during regular office hours of the nor shall the mayor serve as mayor for more recorder. than eight consecutive years. In no case shall r any person serve on the City Council for more r IC , vfAYOR-COUNCIL FORM than twelve consecutive years. These limitations t: J j Chapter II do not apply to the filling of an unexpired term. 1 1 POWERS k No person who is serving as mayor or , Section 4. POWERS OF THE CITY. councilor shall become a candidate for any city --'Q,,-' j office for a term which would be concurrent The City shall have all powers which the with the term in office then held unless that constitutions, statutes, and common law of the $ person first submits a written resignation from J ' [ JI C - 1 Reformatted i994 I ' i k xs - - _ - - - a j 'C. ' - - r -q - - - - - - f' i'i 11 f ✓ - 5 Y - x _ _ . r r . _ . ` , 1 ZVM ?$r "M t _ x FF x n _ - - x - r X ea 3 nk - rv„.•.. 'Seq - - a - --y - - - ~,-,I.g~"Z,.,"~,~~',~ieA~,;~,,~ r e 1 x a ~'•,t~ TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE Charter J 11 ,'r the then current office at the time of filing for council positions three and four shall be subject ° the other office. A resignation submitted to to election in 1974. The candidate receiving the I satisfy this section shall not be withdrawn. A highest number of votes for each of the council '3 resignation shall be adequate for purposes of this positions shall be deemed elected for a four-year g - _ 1 5 section if it provides for the termination of the term. (Measure 53, November 2, 1982 election). ; t signer's service in the office not later than the - ~ , last day before service would begin in the office Section 4. a _ r for which that person seeks to become a n _ r candidate. Repealed by Ordinance 72-16, Section 9, May 't 'k ti 7 - 33, 1972 election. 1- s h F;,' { In the event the office of mavor or councilor ` J, 11 becomes vacant before the normal expiration of Section 10. OTHER OFFICERS. } z _ *a its term a special election shall be held at the ~ _ i next available date to fill the office for the Additional officers of the City shall be a F ✓r < unexpired term. Such an election shall only take municipal judge, a recorder, a finance officer, 6,} ~ place if the council can schedule and hold a and such other officers as the council deems _ 'f F f4 t`a- special election at least twelve months before the necessary. Each of these officers shall be ' '~:~.i'~-"'-~~",;-"-~~:~ ~ r - " ' * term would otherwise expire. If an election is appointed and may be removed by the mayor ~ t ~ 1, g held, it shall be held in accordance with the with the consent of the council. The council may ' ~ T election laws of the sate of Oregon and city combine any two or more appointive city offices. F d E" ~ I -1 . ordinances not inconsistent with such election The council may designate any appointive ry z 3 laws. The council may appoint a person to fill a officers to supervise any other appointive officer ' ' vacancy until an election can be held. (Res. 93 except the municipal judge in the exercise of his ( irr , 11 i 63, May 17,1994 election: Measure 34-6, May 15, judicial functions. (Measure 52, November 5, ~ s,~ ~M w r 1990 election Measure 51, November 4, 1986 1985 election). a u ~ ,l z~ ~ , election: Measure 51, November 5, 1985 election: f pleasure 53, November 2, 1982 election: Measure Section 11. SALARIES. c r ¢t ,w 53, May 18, 1982 election). + _ E a v 's ' f ' - The compensation for the services of each , " u ~ ~ Section 8. COUNCILORS. city officer and employees shall be the amount r £P°~~ 'F fixed by the council. ' 7!s'' 1 The four council positions are hereby i 1 , designated as positions number 1, 2, 3 and 4. Section 12. OUALIFiCATiONS OF OFFICERS. j47' -s ,A`,' ' The councilors shall be elected to hold office for T a period of four years; provided, however, the A qualified elector within the meaningoF the ° r officers holding office at that time of adoption of State Constitution, who will have resided ? , a • this amendment shall hold their offices for the continuously for a period of twelve (12) months _ r - ~ balance of the terms for which they were elected or more immediately preceding the election in an t or appointed and until their successors are area which is within the corporate boundaries of # elected and qualified. the City as the same shall exist as of a date one P `d rt F r- hundred twenty (120) calendar days immediately c a ' At each biennial general state election after prior to the date of the election (inclusive of all t k r this amendment takes effect beginning in 19M, territory previously effectively annexed to the --1 -111-11 f two councilmen shall be elected, each for a term City), shall be eligible for an elective office of the t y 1 t of four (4) years. Candidates to fill positions one City. The Council shall be final judge of the > ; ` f~ - and two shall be submitted to the voters in the qualifications and election of its own members, general election in 1972, and candidates for . ` - t- i - - t$1 ; 3 C . 2 Reformatted 1994 ? t, ! r1sr z kf r a '%'~n'__-~~z ~Z~2~~,~~',~,-,,~~,.,'~~~,"~~-~,-~:~ , . - i~-'~~" . ~ " - , , - I E f - 1 I I _y _ [ !r - . . 1 t - - - i - _ Y r t ^'i fa. - 1 r P ~ , , L - I ~ ~ - , r~ ~ i i _ r 1 - - - r l - - 4 ,I t 3 11L7 y t fv 4 SRe ~x Z- } L ......>uoma._.g.wk,,.,.s~t_u..,a-.rest~u~..r r -s -,A ~-t i - r' i ` • , S ' T ~ TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE + . ; ""„",C A~ _ ; _ { I - - s } Charter` " r - , j subject, however, to review by a court of question before it shall be taken, and a record of x F 3 i r z f competent jurisdiction. the vote entered in the journal , a Chapter IV Section 16. PROCEEDINGS TO BE PUBLIC. r COUNCIL c ~,t a No action by the council shall have legal ? r Section 13. MEETINGS. effect unless the motion for the action by the . , t; ' 1 + _ council vote by which it is disposed of take place Y E • The Council shall hold a regular meeting at at proceedings open to the public. , a~ S,,.. - least once each month in the City at a time and y p1 at a place which it designates. It shall adopt Section 77. MAYOR'S FUNCTIONS AT ?s, "1 Y F rules for government of its members and COUNCIL MEETINGS. f V _5~ proceedings. The Mayor upon his own motion T, -~u may, or at the request of three members of the The mayor shall be chairman of the munch €u' " r. Council shall, by giving notice thereof to all and preside over its deliberations. He shall have r r, k_,x, members of the Council then in the City, call a a vote on all questions brought before the ' 4 j M ~ special meeting of the Council. In the event of council. . the physical absence of the Mayor from the City, `S' ` , ` Y " --i'~xrka the Council President shall be empowered to call Section 18. PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL. , , p,,n special Council meetings in the same manner as i* r ~1 J ` the Mayor may call such meetings. At its first meeting of each odd-numbered , ` t wFf ~ ~ year, the council by ballot shall choose a ` x} r Special meetings of the Council may also be president from its membership. In the mayor's v}n y held at anytime by the common consent of all absence from a council meeting the president s , members of the Council or by the delivery of a shall perform the duties of the office of mayor T`~ fir' s request for a special meeting, signed by a and preside over it. Whenever the mayor is 9 f ~ r r mot majority of Council members, and delivered to physically or mentally unable to perform the - r the City Recorder and to remaining Council functions of office, the president shalt act as the c= s members and the Mayor, if they are then in the mayor pro tem. (Measure 54, May 18, 1982 1 -1-11}F City. All meetings of the City Council shall election). ~ z _Ir conform to notice requirements consistent with a s state law. (Measure 53, November 5, 1985 Section 19. VOTE REQUIRED. , F, election: Measure 59, May I8, 1982 election). Except as this Charter otherwise provides, ` , ~ Section 13. QL 'ORUh1. the concurrence of a majority of the members of , ` ~ the Council present and voting, when a quorum ` t r,; , ~ ; , F A majority of members of the council shall of the Council is present, at a Council meeting, rz constitute a quorum for its business, but a shall be nettssary to decide any question before ` r 11 - smaller number may meet and compel the the Council. (Measure 54, November 5, 1985 w attendance of absent members in a manner election), kf - ,t Q, ~ provided by ordinance. k r 1' R " 11 .1 Chapter V ? F x Section 15. TOURNAL. POWERS A..ND DUTIES OF OFFICERS " F j t a , The Council shall cause a journal of its Section 20. MAYOR. s _ - proceedings to be kept. Upon the request of any t - of its members the aver and nays upon any > t c F R _ C - 3 Reformatted 1994 r xi ;J fi 'r -a- S _ 4 x ~ J J G x i - -'3 - } Yk 1 5 - _ fy~,` f _ _ - _ a C _ r F R , f - 5 F ' . ~ 5-'} - - - -1 L F C- - r 1• ` 1 ~ , 2 , " L , - - ~ , V , ~ I , ~ . _ r ' -1 ~ . " ' I , ~ - - I - ' , ,,,,..^.wr<+-"f'-A-1_, ~'^".r'.-"N { r ? - - 4.. 1 2 a ..r u.a-~. . - - t. i r 5..= ,ter t c. Kil.,a~ ~ 5 t t 1 a 11-11 r~ t 4 z lr' Se-y'^q€."' k.- 1 - il J RCS _ x: Vii..... ~ _ ~ o .:''`"T^' _.,5`' mow": <a'r'3tns%.;~.zi~'.:;?:.q:' . V' , s ' TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE g [ = ~ ~ . y N fit, ~ s$' y i .f 7 Charter ~ } _ a• "'a l The Mayor shall appoint the committees ordinances shall be entitled to a trial by jury as i r 1 provided by the rules of the Council. The Mayor provided by state statutes. (Measure 55, May 13, < r shall sign all approved records of proceedings of 1982 election). j r " the Council and countersign all orders on the treasury. The Mayor shall have no veto power Section 22. RECORDER. r - r r.' 3 and shall authenticate by signature all - w a , _t,. 9 1 _ ordinances passed by the Council after being The Recorder shall serve ex officio as clerk of i= ~ L° r enacted. After the Council approves a bond of the Council, attend all its meetings unless r 3, ~ " g- 1 Y " a City Officer or a bond for a license, contract, or excused therefrom by the Council, keep an n ,,I '.-g v;--' - f ' proposal, the Mayor shall authenticate the bond accurate record of its proceedings in a book ~z' _ " ' by endorsement thereon (Measure SS, provided for that purpose, and be the City's t, r f sip - i j November 5, 1985 election). election officer. In the Recorder's absence from s , d § t'gk. t , a Council meeting, the mayor shall appoint a r. a l ~ x _ j Section 21. MUNICIPAL JUDGE. clerk of the Council pro tern who, while acting in T " that capacity, shall have all the authority and _ = , r ? The municipal judge shall be the judicial duties of the Recorder. (Measure 52, November ~ . t ? officer of the City. The judge shall hold within 5, 1985 election). a S L the City a court known as the Municipal Court ~ 1 4 for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Section 32A. FfNANCE OFFICER. 1 7" Chegon. The court shall be open for the F ' transaction of judicial business at times specified The Finance Officer shall be responsible for 4 - t ~ 4 } by the municipal judge. All areas within the the administration of the City's fiscal functions -r :x T City shall be within the territorial jurisdiction of and shall sign all orders on the treasury. t _I , i- " - A - , the court. The municipal judge shall exercise (Measure 52, November 5, 1985 election). ' original and exclusive jurisdiction of all crimesa i s and offenses defined and made punishable by Chapter VI I x- ~ 1 € ordinances of the City and of all actions brought ELECTIONS i ~ I- to recover or enforce forfeitures or penalties r I defined or authorized by ordinances of the City Section 23. ELECTIONS. i ' W or as otherwise provided by state law. The r ? ' a" I judge shall have authority to issue process for Except as this Charter provides otherwise, t " I t - the arrest of any person accused of an offense and the Council provides othenvisebyorder, the z f -1 1- ` 'i against the ordinances of the City, to commit any general laws of the State of Oregon shall apply ~ p~# ~ 3 ' f such person to jail or admit him to bail Pendin to City elections. (Measure 56, November 5, ° ' , I I 1-1 I "`V - ~ o - N I l ~ ~ - " S i 1' r na trial, to issue subpoenas, to compel witnesses to I933 election). r - ;y Y E appear and testify in court on the trial of any i~ - s { cause before him, to compel obedience to such Section 24° , ? e W ' E Z`U , subpoenas, to issue and process documents A ~ r ~"r e necessary to carry into effect the judgments of Repealed by Measure No. 36, November S, % f the court, and to punish witnesses and others for 1985 election.' ` contempt of the court. When not governed by t ; s t Y,A ordinances or this charter, all proceedings in the Suction 25. ' r r'~-f ` municipal court for the violation of a city r ' Y4 _ E - Ordinance shall be governed by the applicable Repealed by Measure No. 56, November 5, , j 5 ' 7 } general laws of the state governing justices of the 1985 election. 1 ~';'T~--"'_- , f~V~, - o "lll~_',"'__ ~ w peace and justice courts. Defendants in the a h ~ ; municipal court charged with violation of city ~ f ' k it a ; C- 4 Reformatted 1994 y x i }aF F J - ~ - 1 'k ,7 Z '~"-~o~ - U . , 1, " - , . " , I , .7 I .1 I -1: . , , , , - - 1~ i - - ~ A , - , , , , - W t x T, r i a - r " & - - - - h .x z f ~ 1 J L , f - F T"" ::I s f gf, t ` h Y'S4•cYy 3 G Y _ Y - Y . 00 1 -12 T~ 3 1 ..-.t... ~ ~ a«.,.~......o.... ,..v.5'esi:+:L•a:✓.~..[b.a..,..~i`.a~..~S3&L`-wtzasc~.ur......oe. - - - . ~ } T ' F ~i'~ -tar- w TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE Charter ' Section 26. effectively annexed to the City), may be ~ r nominated for an elective City position. Repealed by Measure No. 56, November 5, 1985 election. The procedures for nomination and election for elective City positions shall be governed by r Section 27, the election laws of the State of Oregon, or by City ordinances if such ordinances are not ` Repealed by Measure No. 56, November 5, inconsistent with state law. (Measure 56, May s r- 1985 election 13, 1982 election). w Section 28. TIE VOTES. Chapter VII }v VACANCIES IN OFFICE In the event of a tie vote for candidates for a E an elective office, the successful candidate shall Section 32. WHAT CREATES VACANCY. err*Y " be determirud by a public drawing of lots in a~3 £ --T manner prescribed by the council. An office shall be deemed vaunt upon thee" incumbent's death, adjudicated incompetence, Section 29. COMMENCEMENT OF TERMS OF conviction of a felony, other offense pertaining to ra' OFFICE. his office, or unlawful destruction of public s- records, resignation, recall from office; or ceasing r"'', ; The term of office of a person elected at a to possess the qualifications for the office; upon regular city election shall commence the first of the failure of the person elected or appointed to x Y k the year immediately following the election. the office to qualify therefor within ten days S-a after the time for his term of office to commence; F ` Section 30. OATH OF OFFICE. or the case of a mayor or councilman, upon his absence from the city for 30 days without they Before entering upon the duties of his office, consent of the council or upon his absence from each officer shall take an oath or shall affirm that regular meetings of the council and upon a - he will support the constitutions and laws of the declaration by the council of the vacancy. f United States and of Oregon and that he will faithfully perform the duties of his office. He Section 33. y z +f C shall affirm that he is not then nor ever has been r h t ti at any time a member of any organization Repealed by Measure 57, Mav 18, 1982r advocating the overthrow of the United States election. ¢ eg d government.x Chapter VIII 5 Section 31. NOMINATIONS. 2- ORDINANCES A qualified elector within the meaning of the Section 34. ENACTING CLAUSE. State Constitution, who will have resided , continuously for a period of twelve (12) months The enacting clause of all ordinances u or more immediately preceding the election in hereafter shall be, "The Citv of Tigard ordains as s F any area which is within the corporate follows: , t boundaries of the City as the same shall exist as ' of a date one hundred twenty (120) calendar Section 35. MODE OF ENACT' MEN17. days immediately prior to the date of the£ 1 election, (inclusive of all territory previously c ] C-5 Reformatted 1991 a ? C tt4 yS~ S I- [vl i {f Y J _ - t 's F r Cl- - . - - k 11 a. ' . r.- mod' -M{. <t - Y ~~4 t <.e... 5 S } - } Y?y.„t t F - - - y - fi..gS9 ht' - "doh - - Y } Z wF 7- r- t z ! '.I l ..4Y 1 y Y TIGARD MUNICIPAL AL CODE 4T> s Charter 4 t w i .,3 1 c tY for the Ci 1 , F (1) Except as paragraph (2) of this section Any necessity of taking proper y h' provides to the contrary, every ordinance of the by Condemnation shall be determined by the z council shall, before being put upon its final council and declared by a resolution of the r passage, be read fully and distinctly once in council describing the property and stating thet ! t open council meeting. uses to which it shall be devoted. - ® . - r a , e ~rx z (2) Any reading may be by title only (a) if Section 38. INIPROVONIENTS. g ' i ~ r _ no council member present at the meeting 3 ` ;a 1 requests to have the ordinance read in full or (b) The procedure for making altering vacating a r if a copy of the ordinance is posted in at least or abandoning a public improvement shall be ?v~ ' 3~ V a - three public places within the city limits before governed by general laws of the state. Action on > ,k L it becomes law. (Measure 57, November 5, 1985 any proposed public improvement, except a .Z ~ f election). sidewalk or except an improvement F x- t unanimousiv declared by the council to be \ },i O (3) Repealed by Measure No. 57, November needed at once because of an emergency, shall ` * ' T f s; ~3V 5, 1985 election. be suspended for six months, upon a "n g ~a l remonstrance thereto by the owners of p (4) Upon the final vote on an ordinance, the two-thirds of the property to be specially r~ j ayes and nays of the members shall be taken and assessed therefor. For the purpose of this section - , 7 + recorded in the journal. "owner" shall mean the record holder of legal 3 f 7 a title to the land, except that if there is a z " c r 4 (5) Upon the enactment of an ordinance the purchaser of the land according to a recorded " , t ,<-tea t * recorder shall sign it with the date of its passage land sale contract or according to a verified t 1 ,'ter s i and the recorder's name and title of office, and writing by the record holder of legal title to the R- - £ s°~ the mayor shall sign it with the date of )and filed with the t! recorder, the said ) v t signature, and the name and title of office of the purchaser shall be deemed the "owner". r mayor. (Measure 55, November 5,1985 election; , ° - lLp " Measure 54, November 2, 1982 election). - Section 39. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. ~ w s ( a- l 'N Section 36. WHEN ORDINANCES TAKE The procedure for levying, collecting and gi i EFFECT. enforcing the payment of special assessments for ~ i i public improvements or other services to be - - N 5 ~ An ordinance enabled by the munch shall charged against real property shalt be governed , _ , , ~ T , ~ ~ , - - L--" I take effect on the thirtieth day after its by general ordinance. p `y enactment. When the munch deems it advisable, , however, an ordinance may provide a later time Section 40. BIDS. 1A , r r ` j for it to take effect. In case of emergency, an , i ordinance may take effect immediately, provided Except as provided or allowed by state law, " F " 1'~ that there is set forth in a separate section the all contracts for public improvements to be made ' reasons why it must become effective by a private contractor shall be let to the lowest r r immediately. responsible bidder for the contract and shall be ' performed in accordance with plans and r ` c' t ' `r 7 - ! Chapter IX specifications approved by the council. The 1 PUBLIC LWROVENfENTS council shall have the right to reject any or all s t bids for public contracts. (Measure 51, Section 37- CONDEMNATION. November 1982 election). F - i - V./ f a C - 6 Reformatted 1991 a m f i ~ r r l E Y 1 - 1 { t t - tmr S ,JF r - - $ f r - - , IL 7r 1~ .111, ,~L_ ' A }h - - F 1~ ; ~Y ?~..1 ;'}~TT'~ 3R !`^T"'I[ '._~'z r~~ _v.... ~e _ tIG.G _.,'_3 _ e-.-.s ~.,._e _~_..y. _..1.... _.ic..i._ u. - -.i .~t z 'v 8 - { S - - - ugh'--, - - , . ' - - aw.. ~,a..m,,...,a.a,,.wrw: • xm=:s:+wx.-._.w-,.X ya, -'n. _ x. t 1: a TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE v r 9 , Charter MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS of said agency, and the city shall be substituted for said agency in respect thereto. if, at the ame Z Section 41. DEB LIMIT. this section is adopted, termination of the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency is legally prohibited by „ Except by consent of the voters, the City's any mandatory provision of controlling state S postponed until law, the termination shall be voluntary floating indebtedness for general city purposes shall not exceed the limits of state law. such legal impediment has been removed and r d employees who create or shall then automatically become effective; and, in z All city officials an officially approve any indebtedness in excess of the interim pending the effective date of such this limitation shall be jointly and severally liable termination, the city shall not authorize, approve for the excess. (Measure 58, November 5, 1985 or assist in the incurring of any new debt or Es' y election). obligation or in the performance of any portion of the urban renewal plan. a t Section 42. ` Section 46. ; r { Repealed by Measure 58, May 18, 1982 election. Section 45 is and shall be deemed to be an Section43. EXISTING ORDINANCES ordinance of the city within the meaning of ORS` `r 4 CONTINUED. 457.075. Therefore, Section 45 may be amended or repealed by nonemergency ordinance adopted x All ordinances of the City consistent with by the City Council. The City Council may in t, this charter and in force when it takes effect shill the future activate, create, reactivate or recreate ' remain in effect until amended or repealed. an urban renewal agency in the city in the a manner provided for by law, subject to the ~~r rr q Section 44. TIME OF EFFECT OF CHARTER. limitations of Sections 47 and 48 concerning the s a tr 250 1 methods for financing the activities of such any Ij This charter shall take effect January 1, 1963. agency. URBAN RENEWAL - CTRR~E N1S RIGY,T TO Section 47. VRI VOTE The city shall not approve an urban renewal Section 45. plan or an amendment of an urban renewal plan z t ¢ ' if such plan includes tax increment financing as The voters of the City of Tigard, exercising a permissible means of paving the debts and s' their powers as the ultimate governing body of obligations of the agency unless, prior to the the dry as reserved to them by the ordinances of activation and implementation of tax increment the city and by the Constitution and laws of the financing, such method is approved by the ( State of Oregon, do hereby find and determine voters of the city at a regular or special city s y F that there no longer exists a need for an urban election held in Slav or November. renewal agency in the city. Therefore, the Tigard _ 3 Urban Renewal Agency, as established or Section 43. A, activated, by Ordinance No. 81-91, adopted in December, 1981, is terminated. The facilities, Any urban renewal plan or amendment tiles and personnel (if any) of the Tigard Urban thereof hereafter proposed or adopted shall j Renewal Agency shall be forthwith transferred to require that the plan, including the method of f the city. The termination shall not affect any financing same, shall be approved by the voters e outstanding legal actions, contracts or obligations at a regular or special city election in May or ~ i C _ Reformatted 1994 , ppp~ r a r A r ^-Tom,-~1 7T . , = , . ~~gz g V - 4~ s t ? to . , t its N -y~I F .7 - - ..y..,.. tt l y - - - )k , `iii Vi -Li 4 - _ Aft. -4 - - h ;S Y d h" ...jaV!, ~,X{ .3 ' "j '1 X t ' t 1 F TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE ' 7 a • = t Charter f - if: e~ r Z, , or amendment would or severable and shall remain in effect. (Measure Co ' r i~ovz,,,, if such plan 1 Q 7 could involve the levying of a tax on properties #51, September 20, 1983 election). j outside the urban renewal area to pay the debts t j{ or obligations to be incurred in carrying out the AUTHENTICATION CERTIFICATE OF CITY ) " , , r plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing separate RECORDER r -t- approval at an election is not required for: y x ~ RALPH V. SYMONS, do hereby certify that I r F 'j (1) Expenditures by the city, as am the duly appointed, qualified and acting _ s_ " j distinguished from the urban renewal agency, Recorder of the City of Tigard, Washington a b which have been duly identified and included in County, State of Oregon, and as such have the $ nt yssv; a duly adopted city budget or care and control of the official records of said i' x 4 city. F -a - ,-5 ~ 11 (2) Issuance of Bancroft bonds (ORS '-1.205 sy $ " , 4, to 223-295) in connection with assessments for I further certifv that pursuant to resolution of the e local improvement districts, if such issuance is City Council of Tigard, duly adopted at its - tjr Otherwise authorized by taw. regular meeting of October 8, 1962, there was j t I a ` 3~ a referred to the voters of the City of Tigard, in s : t; ' Section 49. conformity _ with initiative and referendum r~'~f ~ 's,~- ! d powers contiincd in Ordinance No. 62-20 of said ' q ! As used in Sections 45, 46, 47 and 48: city, at the regular city election of November 6, ~ ' - r y } t , 1962, the question of the adoption of the above „ + 5 (1) "City" means the City of Tigard, herein and foregoing Charter of the said city, , 'y gt eg e s , fie Washin on County, Or on. and that a total of 631 votes were cast with respect to said charter proposal at said election 'pry - (2) "Urban Renewal Agency" means an of which 456 votes were cast in favor of said s S°=1 r re agency created or existing under ORS Ch. 457 as charter and 175 votes were cast against same, ' r ' , it now exists or may hereafter be amended, or a and that as shown by the official canvass of the ` ~ _ similar agency with similar powers andpurposes returns of said election, the above herein andw LLl t created under any other provision of law. foregoing Charter was duly adopted by the ~ people of the City of Tigard at said election of : . -L 1' (3) "Urban Renewal Plan" means a plan as November 6, 1962, by majority of the votes cast. _-a defined in ORS 457.010 (11) as it now exists or _ a t y S may hereafter be amended, or a similar plan I further certify that I have carefully compared - adopted under any other provision of law. the above and foregoing copy with the original , , of said charter proposal as filed in my office and k C ' (4) lax Increment Financing" means the that the foregoing copy is a correct transcript f 1,14-'.,M~:z_' :j method of financing described and referred to in therefrom and the whole of said original as the " i ORS 457.420 to 457.460, or a similar method of same now appears on file in my office and in my z k~k financing provided for under any other official custody. s f provision of taw. rr k [ further certify that by resolution of the City Y - . r : i Section 50. Council of the City of Tigard, Oregon, duiv r _ t -Y a t passed at its regular meeting of November 26, If any section or portion of this charter 1962, the above herein and foregoing Charter - r r amendment (Sections 45 through 49) is was duly and confirmed as the a x i~ determined unconstitutional or unlawful, the Charter of the City of Tigard.-Oregon, to be 3 remaining portions and sections shall be k_, j C) E :K C C-3 Reformatted 1994 - at I t - i k; S I ` ~ , . f l --3 - -t 4 : ,;,,'_p r':.~., , , -L, , ~ : LL - , ' - I ' 1 0. I ~ . ~ r~ I I . ~ ~ I I ~ ~ i , j I - , , - . 1-,-~ , - - - - T f , t 1 Y. - - - R I r 777 _ .tom-•_,~_ , ..._~a - ate __'..r--r-,~.a.,..,. r,^-.-......-_...'.._.--J'_' +^..-r~.T.~.-..... i s u._x..__.. Y _ ~.~i_..~ ,._t.2...v..~. __.~i - ....r... s,:1.. ~S .1i F,.r _2 _J,. s ~..~.,.s~. y. ~._.c' _u.._..r`•` s fi i I :c'~ r ''-t t i h',7 S'. ~ I„~ ~ 1 It ;.p } ~ ~y ff I .1 a- a . ^ . r r><,.:.,..>:,r: v., .,y.,•,. x _ ..=1`c'°„ "-4y.,al., awl t Yxl'_ kl. h ar r Y; -..x, .M ti. o.,, 1, _ "i- -:1 . 'u,', 'ixY x ~",.,e [r r ~ a.,b?',v~u,~r~•. cy t h. v: . ."rc, ~.•C.`4~~.'' ^~.'-7 ,e of w ,±~Y'r;1~` t ~~J::a. ,~t:~':54ts,'X t4.- 'r: ''~5 'l~ • . ~.-..>F Si..~.:. S • .s Es!.. .w., ,.<3, .w _ a G : - r,M:^'f-'~^,"~. K4rmr,?=aan'::rlt.:~ •assS:, rar„„G'kW r r Ir d' ,ar.,k,3M ry .Y?re~~' n, d . - ~ , J 4.,: a.. `L Ps' ,may 4k, +s✓' 1`'^r.,,rr+• x«r 5 ~p ' ,a! ,,r~,>r ~,.s",>~ >a:a , =:+h,.3:i'F - ri$+.xw+ , w a 9 s%A- . ?kFY - ` `kY k. a , dr,^{r '+„n e=c^q€,' .s• >:•a:ar'f. x,`t~{6>N'1ry~.', sR+rxtL. t°- .t 1. , .'=f v ,rvw I. , a q , r r €x.'=. a+ h d ty, r „ d' :P, a. r t. =a$., Y'` t,,; r,,F. =s , r•n-. a. JY : ,w vCsr ,a".. k'$" .s '"k„ r.e n, tdkr',, ~ - ffk- , .t .i. f a^ .'.a.. %s~. s. x,F,'r^-':r-r.-.,..rJ r, Sx~X^ ekia r Swt s. u" Gr~ l ~ !i a»'" ' k`. ~k :~F ti L=, tr r . ,LtY- ~ YEu, s.:Yz'Si n'•3;'iii% n:valJT 5 : 'fr f<~~;§- .'A ~n5 ,<yw SS'~: g is raw J . , : .w; . 5 a =,,.rk:lri A s _ .ts~a, - 5 . <1`,"'1~-: S:v'rv. E . =a. IS` - .x "•4i2v~,z. „ ~ x, w r,., t, h . r7•' ~ NG is c~` a ~4y 7•'. : f, xt.rr r 'A v^~s _ ",~'a`' .y'~+'e.:F'~`S` „P a, `i, 3'r', .4. "<,~`~•8"-.,ad,c^, a'2 tv.,, tl m xr t'. .a.::r.~ S-Ad '.,;s`s'. •aP` s+y°, - r'r r *IM, $Lt~~ :t" R+ r „~°S P' <H 2 , V. , n S: ^ , `r = t'c£a;;'rWM~`:'° 3 ?k' tl~':'' , CNhEF K 'a't. ~ ,err B e+ s. t ] ^ »,i. ,.r5,> .,~~?•»~'e , f} .:er,>•. aw 3'~ r - ~ : • x3'r +y~~• p ~ i :ii ;"ti " ,'.t " .a >•^ry4 „an'~.'^., e•,,en P a. , it uA , n~n 3X .A -.s. "•i c ,•„w", C ,h '~ttr ~ .i.~ t' ry i , ^ ,':'f . i • J ?d ,z *k .'~c r::a,rf+` ~ ..~i, , -v+ ~ d tii. : ~tv' ;_,r. _ ,:,+f ,~firr Y - Irva: , J ,+r':s d `N` a t~ r x yk Lr _ G i,4". . f .g t ~ ;rrrr`:` t ~'',F~~r1. 6. ,3'• '"~I§`!, ~':"Sn 1 J .<W-° ]i S 3 . u'4^v°; +.v1i. y ss t';.r„ F,x#J. Rf..A'^ -r t)'^ x•y `r'c+ f r-':t~E .Y.~'>k-. t .,<V,n' T,., A,< J"C'f• h:4? +f 9, - - G .a!'"w "i ,ti"c F ~ n 'Ih: 4£' ~ 4 r••.a • ~'a, _<ftir , ~ .a,,,', r•~< rb ^cxvarv• ti~: "1'a3 ~*Y:~'MST: k Y k~ f' Y -r• t, n @~ s ~ ~ ~ . s,'.'ti „,',f°i L" i%' Tk' t<ns 'ra , bL ' ,'t, "a" 4 ,"3 ns t41Y`'' 5. ,.1~ M1. ^ '~i3 C . ~ ' ~ 'a -Y"'''e } r. ~ - 'i a",~ v >k"~ 'iJ tY,t•• ? ~ r M E± .a. Ifi % 1 .l'4 «d';=i7,'x - M` )v ynv. :tklA' y} f ':sa'• `4~,,.q a y.•.s., , k , : •P .b ',Y ° h t 1 ~ 3v ,..';Fv.~•. ,~Z" ,Y~ r,~ C+ <W::.•,hn$'rd, ,k kiwn3. 'P"' r °ix:°%~{ f ?4' A ,xs'F.n ~ .1{,: +cl4 'Va '4 , ~ k .h,.-.r' w. ,7 i "`k it ^ •`fdr -,1 5 d . ,1 f' °'i: .-i:',::e ~i"r, Y. S.i7'et nzT^-,`'x ~~'S•., tr ~ r °w V M ,y '+:'Yr4 it r~ J - ^~+-t .,vl ..~L r`J°'/•e J. ~£9 ;x7r 'd'^i ;ika''+i'x+y,.t ,vr,' .'M'%'rJ'" _ _ y d y 6 R %i T MEN ON., } s r~3rt >~k~ _ woo W slog PF 9E ' e .d r I r~ x { } ~ ° J 'n r S J i i l a % r "S ySl ' u E hF '1' * -3l ~ + t, W I J AM- } " .r t~d { d ~ _ Ft ! ~ G ~i.. ~ ~ t - Z NI U + Z, s uJ ~o F n ° - --°3 Q o E o a - - r $ V lJ i'. i d 1 H 'n ~ t r;I t 3 H ~ ~ ; r L o c o c ~.ij WARM r G v n d n Z' - '.1i,J < - to I yy O r w'O W C - - f t ~.h - Am }r Is f Y y y `7' O O r s dr R- v -,rl 1 {'x- r,j tf y, _'1 p' m .L~ O - c ^ P S ME Ike; r~ f e r "p C i > ~ W G 7 G 7 r Isl 1 ri'a ~}+a r na t I s n Op X x k ~ t 1 'ti' f. F T H ! •7 Aj r d3 r nWr« }t rwi t oa c t g til i xar ryR.xr'{{, k~"'k - d .-r C xo O fL 3 I x' irks itv 'r 4 t1tJ „ ;k ~ r - Y { E + L "a r k.:2r'~t v~'qt wti~ t ~ ` - d{ ~ } 'i _ ,v i5 fAi`Mxs rrY~#a 3~x ~ra~?~ M~'xt n, rv, { fi F - ry j~ til.~ +r l+ 6A #~1ru 1 ~ e^`r"`~ t~, _ A `r ~:~t kY~ ~'a > -rf ZEmE c± S~+kS, (t'tS.,xw, 3.`c~'?r> i,';M. z,e 1.4~' 7^m' _ , ,t' F'' - t,j j a-a a' _ 4,i-''- ] 5 •`tn 's 'x 5 a s zI 3 Y kc~. r h i_ d xr.x- :-t. rr K i X ~ d i b f~ . < ~ `I~ 1 E x k ~ • +n„ ,4 7§, - ` -`ar5 , ~ , : ,7 ~ 'fi'r., ~ . s>~ x r`•:~";r'~"°; ~ c- n S -all M i7: .r x . ' •'Sns. ,f , 'a = . ~ , "A (C. f, ti . G a4 S:','@.. •'4egR . -Ei~'•.T1'J ~ , .A D m°.: , , t:3 ,..y,.,u 't '..J, a?h• II Y.,s.,.-k, t}~ 55 :N ~teu f! JL,.. •r•R'.'+N' k.e^=,+=ei „`r;. ?i b4 +°A 1 f~ r,3i I 1 A~ .4 ,,'i>Le L• ,°oC.:, ;.5 e`T 3+ iiA ,A ,.s-., ~t S'".!i r. .M ....p',s .,ra•t':,,; ~3'k.`.,u<ryN, C•MY ( it 'k•,k r,,~s;ai r'.i'=r w't• k, `rr< ~,.ti, <i , .,.:c '4"u' „t, 1.. . ..'d•..i<- a>a"•rr tr~ t . tm_ ,:u,+a., w•,r `x'~.. ! .'A%" ,Srr +.i fir v'^:~i<:•'t :`^1.. i` ''7?~' •t4`a: n-a to +`"iS - 'T.T` ,4 y+. 4.: i.n4, ..a,-`,- .,A.. y,•%.=, Y":d9111 `AY •`4.v,+z. p l r" - '>S :Fri " 'J. °•Sx '4P-:« W>' r6i,"a' :h Z~j .'6, ' S. 't',4,"', ail. .i ;~-~e.si`•' yi' W'' ,.<'yt n . ,..4 _ Cat n.<, Hl: .SSFv'~' .r,~ +f-~>. „~'`v,.,r5 +r44ti "'a'.'v`', 1 1.-,.•L.•EU { .ky i. A u+'y, ~ is , 3,:. ",s, . ~"'-,r:.r:,, .,.~.,t ^3 f } - a ~ , S .ek'."; ss': ^'S• r-2 ri "a? H V-, r,2~. `5: YA rs" , #yyy ttl. i xl A.5 1'~ ` d~..?i.:~^`'• <n:Ai^: 'fib ~5i, .,fr~ ~ t~ ,'t3~ rr '^rn.°, { ++r9 3 3 aY eYa, tr o-A ns}:.at,, ,_r1"^ "IeW, °id~"L~''. :`M1'r'ii aa'ry`t. +Y ~'ipv, `{r' ?«p Sj`3 i.Zu <YCi•e ny r,, 4MeM^Ft : ",f.-+rx4'" '.C S, yea,v Ate""" .,,J• +^=x,. h~.r a„,J< ,T °'Ka < ^~•"::;-c £ .n S, _ F •-sY' Y F A ti k f d. ~^t!"•'~, 's?. 4i.>~ ,1~:': ea,, ,s -u4"emt.,rS. 'Sw .w ~n >s a~,i,,~ ~ y^_ ~>7r" r afy s s ~ ear, t-~ VAR b + r.R+ .:.l rV> i<,. d, ",^"U ,+rC-,.- °k s!-_• "+..y. ~weT-w.,~p_~tl- 4 G .K E•• i scaP-' .-x,i,,i .3+W .~:a^A: 4 S'r`i': ',k'r. #S C . Y' e a^^~ " .ai^ I:S•,. tt~,. °r,r. c._. ^ -.fit .~a.~ 1a+-<, , ;t = ''r '.a ,•rr 4-r. • ate., .s. e . :s ^+f."°4 ",~>a` ~ '.e1 ;,S` a, ',la',~.~P, ~ f -V rr. . ~ , w.~r •t. . h• ,5, y~FU'.:~: F. 3.'en ,fi+etT. v ~'i. a., arv °d Jk .nr_ ' 'arch. ~^e':. ~Y,;~;a .C",•,„'*,:~ : i ` :stwr;. .~2 ; `".:T" Fi=, ~rr.,r .n,'"~ 4'. ~C - ~i`:'., +~.k, ~ ~•r esal. 5, t1' .et ss~~,, . `f,. ~"xlbm'.. : ;P"aa::~t.: i,r3 ;~i _ r4 . . ~"4z"w,° < . .s",•~s.St e"RN~. .,,,v.„<.,. ...,~a'i:•':~:r. :~`~''a1~:.,.,.:ku: .,,!i%-`..,. N.~.~,-.<„_. rna ml.,_x:r•_:a e$=~sna°t._- .s. ~~'a' a, .+~~5 tis'*-..'~-. .d.a. _..°t3..,h..s.'b5„<. ..r..e_w„.°:,:z"~4a,k'. .r'ir .r..c.r'. _.v.i y f pry r-..~~~.a. +n-v~w'~--.~n_~ •a.+•rP -^'7777717' 7 l - { Err uonnlnswj', ~a1O 96-5661 { - - . z aldcad Aq wlwndde ..q- anu j. Pasdww a.-.mot cr.:-pc warm°J° Moo C ililT'IOL (•K W PndoPe'6161•d'rut ,o cwaeoalrta act - 7 am a-M Pal , •cawl %¢J v>nc Puoq :,paa ~ aq Ueys uonmunII.0 Mahal alms aqL lel(r) _ PaaY i:aamoJ^ Z -f.i ao 1taiu."{adns -IM uobaaO in lu>wdol>Mp arwouoaa I--. wtwlap uo uaya cuopEam -n. man »ryo ploy o, c+»uto t ~aam Aigta>cseaAn¢IC6a'f aW.'aI>R+v m'4s cPu°q = . 1 bwa4yl pue sgof 5Mea1> Jo acodlna aql ,d panacl spuoq atR J. lsa+atul Pu¢ ,o) Dax== d Jo lulu Ard pm uonrs SII03NV'I'I3~SIL¢ bpalo mamA¢d In a api- m lvnoul¢ ,laoad A4 w ' -erulwpe)- lnq 7saaalui bMpnPnl 1PW11c N uobalOJo aims aN N Auadwd •A1ano7 alms am uto.q cP.d UV •L.11 7 alrls AX 3TDISiiV - p4iO. Q. Anenvu¢ pawl aq Ueyl ram v tT Ac j I, alvado p- tIengmsa Hmi. 4algm uwsnlnwoO 7 r,~oJu py •o°aauclo oamo6'9 °oRa°S Aq w,aopr •u,e - - A+allal alms a41 wleala Aga1a4 sl a1agJ, lCl Iza61 'a AoN al aieA9ad>,f paAO,dda1 10861 'OL Aerl aido ao aln:~ - pn•'ia61 '6'oN l3 r 5 W pa•odo, :IapoA' ynd of iyl -A-be aI- Twd mP N C tort 1 nr°wa• -a--3 Jo Nq N P-Wd 'awl •K roN NPS Onant, wealol -Pan -ol ~~IP~ 'Alole(nb>taan a411— Ue4c IawY •nPJ° 1 uort>x n-1 we 4%61 'It roN NIT _I'Op laltnweag1 Pagan 6P4oq bmPunJ>a dde Aue m Aluoglne - _ aAq.Z uoltv5. R wtatmnap vonaa• snnl 8561 'r'A417" - 4 Ile o tmol stn [[r45 a41 01 w P goo p .q j bUfuu1.¢ uo xpw - 1 Alqu+asa • aM¢Igb>'1 •1 - ' alp 10 lwuvlme a agnbal Pur eaznd aq! 11utn aidoad Aq wMOpe'a56i •tr wy v'r'S Vano,yt wte++Jl Anwelnmi r - Va• ®P•as2 Y o•pa•8 , 7ng aPIW I," in 1 uonaac M Paai aq blgcnq -.vetawp•g •1rn J. ~ in .1 A.-w.u- wnulpcew a 1x -o»ol ao ovinq'caliJr-t jP,rowe >gl 8utleba~8e~ uoq awn Auc _ i _ nbaq M agtrald Ae,n pus •cuonePlln J Ilalxuv mnlo t uonla• aawoJ 1>u< uonaaa mnJ° ^aq of bwPbwtq - -l Wope apWVSMNCUw,aaa BS6l aavu lPUeluwaa• P°e wn lagA alaW.'aP1W Ue18'la a' 5 a ao suonr:Pleb,o algoiP>Wap nr4c -.prinbal 1 `_•dl Bs61 'r'AON aldoad Aq wtdone Pu•'aS61 'Ir'M Z P'°¢ I Nollaax in Alpoglne aaPun woes{ col alms a+~ - r - agy -.-dand m,oonw ao •lewaiwj •algt1Peq> v rS Aq p-iw teadad •8061 't aunralaoad Aq wtd°P• 'Jemq At. Patq. m pi- p- wnw aq Amu J - utagl )o xnr-»q,wei Aq wuUaP se suonePuno) ao pur't061 -I '°N v IS Aq Da•odo,a luav,gnfvy bggl ~ ~~IgppnJalj -.p°oq Tulpmajag •6 a°Raa6 atul alp to I ` - _ xuope3l4e510 vanscn- suonmiuebao snoklnw J-y....... 31 glwnnmaw+•1i~nrf-,i- -•iPTTE 10961 vz 1- -1 AV 1e •paa>"' - > o (¢LLla 4 'algelPega •uon>al cM ul Paco •Y ~t8[8~ IrL wN Nl'S 4inonl, wta01 'alnlels -1gaP°I pw; uonean e8 o enotbna ao •1¢~alr9 ..Iqm a¢4> Aq -,u fwn. Pie P-P-11 ee 7s> a ul to easy 4anc -q P_ tlP_ ail -u ouol ao obulg se 4a1nw1 A[--- /-liol am Pue uaalybu -A nn of -,d asngH a,nS a in uop r°pgyd -n. ao) vtu Ileys Pue m1o) g>ns N w°re+ua - - . aloe agl J0 uonebnf laagp a aq ~.r f oUJe1 )o uoneptbal Pur •uonr-tatlo •1ww4cngelsa -gala agl aq wt>wlum 1q.p a° 'wPuad» a»gS ^1¢I A9 wD aa f y - _ a,n aoq apv-d Aew AlgwascV annlq.Mvj -ILL IZl a1n j. f- ao •wwl aq Ueys m oN'696T P_ I ILL R1 ganc &meal>Jo asodlnd ~ P ofaoudPoq eig• )o agpaap •L oouaas j>lyy sM )0 1 uonax Aq wluog,ne p -q feu Aq au,ec 7 . _ >411wAald [R4c A19uussy annElsiba7 a41 Pue 11,iW srytp C W° 1 -uu-1•°" "ju-Wm ua o1 wn•'cl aq Arl°'a l wPNwd ula+>VI au°I P,uq n wdop• afxuy mn A C uonaa• 8561 ay, AeJ of •w ql are •aa vleq% acodnld Aue ao) •slallan ° ~lg aqi 1n4¢ yoanlp amen -3 r aauuol Poe uorivc •ttP18561 'r aldoaa M -d°P• 1 - irint _ AM1.1 N -1- a111 Pin, _a ".l ...n- sin in 'G561 'I,'oN ll r s Ononn 1_'An: 'A1ungO uoY¢W ~c 11° aq Uo xtwotd 1aagP a 5uluwlu°a i . - + 19,PUe'ISI'Irl'ICl 'IZl cuonaasgncwwPlA°ld ce 1r-sASf(~7°a1mS a411°sW°6'¢pa°8 -L °.Baas ldaaa31tl ~aRa»o17o ooR¢P~an. v°RaaS aq II¢4c .1m. aN ao)luauwanob in leas luau Id161 'oL A•N Aw¢Pn i --ad at, -1w-wo7 13-1 'i -0-0 !s Jq Paldop• •6L61 "Z'oN'tl'f S 49no,yf wI-31 t - - -aalpo)o glen ue ale Pue -alms IPpwV •nnJO c vouaz m,di„o aau+t4 Q3'. lr•rcr I c11i11 Pue'calmS w,NJI alp )o ugPnmcuoO >1n pue uonas sty, P nan w wldov aptw •nn n t uonaaa `.:::.^a',T°t9 gane .q Au.. in lug®xrenp¢ atp r 1 z - 111 -ddns al -neuI WI, ao m- u¢ ,m 'Joalagt 8561 a°uuol D,1• t uonax tnacvdl BS6, 'r'AON ald°ad d e T PIIe aq Ile4l Jovayl luauv adal ZIQII l o - opnp atp uo Iftw. a alPJaq •mnic'uonnlncuo0 Aq wdow pue'as61 r m: v'r•s Aq pa•naatd poda6 'slaaf d Abnua T..q ar- U- J° luaw c'nn aapun aaulo Aue of wllnodtl¢ ao wlaala :6sgi J° uonnn.uoJl vw,vwu•1 jr a•o6 •t .oaao.s dqu_ . op aql aoJ 8w>sseug apuotd °1 pass aQ Ueyc - .-ad A1an3 -aoa®o le s p.O -C uop.a6 MI m aoud a•noy mn• to uonaa,3 Z .Jli'J11111d ue q 1>a(oy .Olaau3 teaal attfa9 a - - F ,uouwa•o9 Jo t•aS oas aia sB luolq aq of Pury a bunrala in aeod •ctnaA q :+md all aol alms aIp w Auadnld in fF J. amen w•.31M1141n,- Jo shoal 241 •a. in Au¢ al +r. lorlr4 s AlgwaecV annnlxha"1 SNi11RNIi3AOJ .d0 •LV3S l ion luann nowc Iin a n, ue m qM I all n lag auo in Jlet P- ijun- r; . y s noddy a1, Alun4l- a AIX 3 I3I L8V p-1 ssaulip g p aol uo wv sn fni: am ln0 '111- _ - >q A- uobalp Palms av1 a in MJo nP'~a> In 41 1 uonricu. in alnx¢ald am buyn - ° ti P PP4 aQ Im4c aaUl° 4onx ~"'Uollwpsuo'sM 1° A alanlV '6 P°r 1 cuon>as ..Ppw. -palelaap m lou Jf i n-:mel Aq pat¢laaP aq Arw fq. ni 'q A mdoad Aq w,dopr 1>u<"SS61 'ZI 'oN lJ 1 5 . S 1 - a 11 'UOnn)nxuoO aI n Aq l.I pp-d ]nu Sr a>11,o Ai pxadnd,•ada9 :6SPI Jo ugtnnano)J 'Yaa®° aIm. '..;T Sq w1,IgUOa gpUn atp bulPUmcmtAUON •em a+g v'1'S y`•. Aur in uoun,np a4l uagM •vna•11mt_P_ to °onn•oadwoa aaglo ao satmm -1 .opaas mgl7hf.: I Assam lea°1 PI- IT— :Pazu coq :aa®° Jo -I •L °ouoa6 _.ti•it{,aaa u¢ot of P--odwa 63-6 -1 °.Pass aI.q. ui'.. 10161 'V -N a,d..d 1.5r- i ala,vV at•ntv)p or uonel•°ai 'S a11NO,t _ - Aq wdopr 1M'168ntt is ro f"N Aq tr••odo,a rvaum,rau,v I= '.TI.' IIZ nyacv ro av^°5 'r 6141 al lur - - - :6591 JO UOnnut-al -uontnnsuw sigl Jo u.,.-tl a•P°°q bum,nya9 'C lydPUP', - r- nmo Aue buIP11ms4)uuou P2M-.I.P AtM.U el dread sWoB 'Z lux., I!q(1 Y a°nf at Aq wdopr n„r'gWt 'r qaJ L+t gyaua P,AI alq~li•I a4. Madde A- 1n loon A1un wnt ummad anenm Aq Damd^,d tuawpuauN •°'°t w I P- lsalual a ilr4s Mat a Aq w~doin- p.r'1 W I '1 0 'N f q a) lipan yaol of puvn,dwa at¢1S ' 1 '»S atu' - - P.,_ _11 nv~= M! nt naluloddr .-ad 'o sure waid°,d 5 5 (•y"~ ~ -lsaluoa uon 1 4 J asnraaq paillmnb w tL-••urv x5vt to uonnn•uo~l -smrl , r4 'wlaaP P a P-1-1. gaaq loo xr4 aan,o Ir-lauab a41 P11r uomm~ntc> 6141 nq wVlnoad atoJ c WM 7txJ2I3IS3 Aq wa.1 •anv,,,. l i r i if, g aocxao>n. r Pur D wqwn>w ur 1Janx olalay xr auoP bnn„Yd In p-'w1a21a aq Ilr4o r Wool) 37v3s 17V US - - I Jo uual aVt u2q n 23U,o imp buivuOw xLno.. aqt nluud T¢K a4, w,atva ay ❑r4a vnrl y>ns 1PUf1 rg. 3'IOIyYIV btnpmaw - sum n. - _ - - i ul bulpuad si lxa,uw uonaala ur l1 pm :wal qv --I nq wpin°la aq awn of >wn wotJ Aew In, in pw Pm tnun Awn a>UIO plo4 Ilr4c a4 'w,wPp uonmuadwoa 43n6 aAia>a1 llCtll aalnpd ilmx atjl, IgL61 'C Any aldnaA A9 patdopr -lmm~r q Pu , tuna-j- mass I..q,unaui -11 (Z) 'FUnuud In lte am m a>uaYadav et¢aA ual ueg, '"St 'I. TI'r N M^o,N woa,Ji'eltot.N.d lr buim:{ 'wUlwnb Pin• •P.,-T. x-j loo pro alry iw4l ot; -luud alms r :n Puonnnlsuoa bunallwn lw pauad- Hoye x;ql Jn t I E _ i '„t1m7 tal♦ - - nm{t inure ca>ufo auto PIn4 luawluioddr ao uon>aia ay1 ao) Pur'SulPwg ptn' alanly srgL •alatul• cM J. xu.;= j In. Aura sP°' - 11.4 .r,m•t - _ _ _ _ em wrn FunaVd alp,. stn aoi 6 ,v=d p>1-s2 aq Arw . ac S.04 1asu. P. p a Algw_-ry anneln:trJ aul Spuoq u e ~:,~Y - IIe4e •palsa)aP gar u¢ uon>alaa111aas o4m w2 eluaq n 1 Ir wnaui pug A19wacxlr ann¢ICi1i>J agl J. uag __1 -/aloud ng6:JlonuVd °1n6 •T uoPaa6 'oPwv alawaoyo °1 aePgxi -1 -t °°Paa6 - Al NO •c1n.Uto fN (11 otaagtmug Pwes)>p least 'CZ AnIX wtdon' - o01_p. :S°°t1da21n:paaaal•Yo••aaan• 010114UHIT SUMS 2ldmd AQ-dop•'Aa61'19- T IN y1nWr wt•arJl Aq w~ . -c ~t - IP® .also ploq o1 vas®o •T UnP..s II% MOLLIIV von¢b al an i- 2nrq Jos. sna loon wP°m nqo aan to w lc>lalui 1 m'• . u,uovq algto anRaap uz" '6 cPUnq agt,'•¢ei Aq Nin- d av lir4Yaw ut sum to SJnu --ma, d 1Pnc aq S cl . ea, n of ata®I,a •.-M 's lo9m 'oz Any 4' al¢1 l,anc maqp aAq wdope •6[61 'Y roN b rS 4ano,Yt 41 Jo xuon 41 a a^° ,In - - - rn twr•ae nn.y=m° w,.a,al -u¢lodlooui tar ao 1 at>nl w aq Ile4l P - ,uaurtn ao,uoq wl ae,aaa, m ,ou.,»610 1° Alt> aP o l aagP da1 ag ImVe a1a11+Y aM Jo 1 nnnax 1un°un• _ A,-. a Jn -iSUOld bunatlr- Aura2xap11°4aasladnc wncn4 cPvo9 'lapuag T °°Paa6 leant - utw uor,aptdad sa,e n",i 'P u 1 I- P• om d .,p loo A- a,mc stn Alntlod a,•+•dac p Son•n.dat gu•q.nvF aPNV "U ,.PiW c11n Jo SuolslAOl .Map n »alq,+• ,aa ua¢,°o w1a+•n n Avadad y: m uMWcibal 1>ew limp AJgwar aN1elsTa'1 a41 Igtet 'R Any Ur:w _ wuangNuq,el,3aN 'f -o-/RV-3--JP 01 UoRT~a7'61MPaa6 ndoad Aq w,dnpe'aas,'iq oN N'1 Ht(s^oM 011 . KN h _ • - _ J... S , r't' v.x•ya- lAv+i~..ar+. ti ~i i'p" - Frt'~t, _ - - 1 ?*u-_ r _')Y q• C~:r 4. -v w e~-W ?~.l_"^^n ~ '~x'Calll' ...a