City Council Packet - 05/16/1995
ffy F TIC A
q _
t
4
i
I PUBLIC IVOTICE. Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the 4
'a appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor
at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes k
or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or f
the City Administrator: ,
Times noted are estimated: it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be
present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. slness a i terms ;
am be h in 7:30 p=ans
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should
be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting.
Please call 9-4171, Ext. 309 (volce) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications devices
` for the Dem.
Upon request, the city will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing
' L
' impairments; and
' Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to F
allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on
the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above:
639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (*DD - Telecommunications Devices for the Dem.
SEE ATTACHED AGE14DA
COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 16, 1995 - PACE 1
-
TI O CITY COUNCIL.
BUSINESS MEETING - Y 15, 1195
AGENT
E` -
6:30 PM
I SCUT SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session
under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations,
a real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware,
j all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore nothing from this
meeting may be disclosed by those present. Representatives of the news media
r are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed
during this session.
FOCUS MEMBERSHIP (COUNCIL DISCUSSION)
' City Administrator
7:30 (PM) `
1. BUSINESS MEETING
1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board
1.2 Roll Call
j 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items F
i
7:35 PM
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please)
E
7:40 PM
3. COPSE AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an
item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to:
j 3.1 Approve Council Minutes: May 3, 1995
F,
7:45 P
4. JOINT MEETING WITH A Ti IN !!ALLEY DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVES
Maintenance Services Director
i
COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 16, 1195 - PAGE 2
1
f
1 5.45 PM
5. PUBLIC HEARING - SOLID WAS RATE INCREASE V The purpose of the public hearing is to review information and take public €
i testimony regarding a possible solid waste rate increase. Rased on existing
Council , franchised solid waste haulers are allowed a rate of return between
S% an per year which is computed on gross revenues. The 1994 haulers t
s financial reports, in the aggregate, reported a 7.52% of return. Council will also
consider enhancing the residential recycling program by adding collection of all 1
through #7 plastic bottles at curbside.
a. Open Public Hearing.
b. Declarations or Challenges
c. Staff Report: Management Analyst Mills
d. Public Testimony
• Proponents (Support a Fee Increase) t_
• Opponents (Oppose a Fee Increase)
_ e. Council Questions f
f. Close Public Hearing
g. Council Deliberation: Resolution No. 95-D-D.
3. NON-AGENDA I SFAS E
7. ®ECU-IWE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session
3 under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations,
real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware,
all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore nothing from this
meeting may be disclosed by those present. Representatives of the news media F
are allowed to attend this session, but must not disc;ose any information discussed
during this session.
8. ADJOURNIMENT
a
craw ss
i
i
i r
i
COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 1S, 1995 - PAGE 3
}
f
i
1 I
I
L
COMMUNITY
Legal ~
F.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0350 Notice TT E 18 8
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising t `
i2 E C E I V F D
OCity of Tigard e E3 Tearsheet Notice
13125 SW Hall Blvd. m A. y 15 igr~ s
'~4rigard,Oregon 97223 ❑ Duplicate Affidavit
- r'
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION - ,
STATE OF OREGON, )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Ass. ~
Kathy Snyder
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising 4
Director, or his principal clerk, of thdCi qn rd -Ti, a at nT; me s
'j a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at Tigard in the
aforesaid county and state; that the
' City Council Meeting
'I a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for 010~successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
May 11,1995 `
s
~ i
Subscribed and sworn t "fore me this 11th day of Nay, 19 ~
OFFICIAL -",'+L
6 rc-F,.`: A M49GE S j
'i ?UEtI -
AF -:?^I
Notsry blid or Oregon NQ7 t CQM7atIS110N NO. 0245-52
Commission Expires: MY C0MMIv'S!0 i XPiRE$ SAY iry *9~7
AFFIDAVIT _
r
L
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, I NC. P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice TT 8189
BEAVERTON. OREGON 57075
kECEIV'Et)
Legal Notice Advertising
MAY 51995 ;
'City of Tigard e ❑ Tearsheet Notice f
13125 SW Hall Blvd. CITY OF TIGARD
'ITigard,Oregon 97223 ® ❑ Duplicate Affidavit
, ~ g r .:ty C1"i'1f ~P 1"ECs~"t s.~~: -~-4'~+t$'w.~~~1.~ f
ota is hereby given that_th-6'Tigrird City Council Wfij hd M n p r f
' °ie g oa stay 16,4995 at 8:30 P.M., a the Cite Hat[ `lhcr ~ If,~
1,3125 S.W. Halt Roukyard„ Tiprd, t~ga~i ' '
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION!
nepurpm f age Council l'ab is ti' s, # to
r, 'e `hn c rf f
STATE OF OREGON, y t~]ce uea¢1ny regerrltrig ~ ~SSi$tle ~vaet~; ~r~ ~ r f ~ ? F
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss existing Council policy, franchi solid w ° 6ts,:5
i, Kathy Snyder o return bet~rre~tf a% and 10% per e€itb I FHFF i::r gra K
rev6tiu The 1,094 Is1 rs financial rex uG st d~ t U cz ~ a f
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising 7.62% 'Mr oil4, .Cog€~ti tg -1v All °1%6 ^c;
Director, or his principal clerk, of the. Tigard-Tua1 atinn mimes reiyclirgjimpj~n iy iy ca;i of.-t
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 1 curb: i-Ja L1 C__r m.~ ,a:
and 193.020; published at Tigard in the tht di cti o O~~ f ,~7 Rc^ i. f
pareaaid county a(id state; that the
I 130ti.ce Public Hearin :
g City
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the May 5, 1995
~
entire issue of said news a er for ONE 'l ;89 Nu Ush iby 11,19 5_
P P successive and
consecutive in the following issues: j
f '
May 11,1995
1
Subscribed and sworn to or3 me this 11 i h day of P.taT.,19 ~ -
i
OFFICIAL
'A.
j Notary lic or Oregon CG.m&I;SgiO;N P'O. O:?4;;52
My COMMI~•'ON EX iRES mim,
My Commission Expires: - y
AFFIDAVIT
f
f
t: ng highlights am publ!*A, for,
r a obtained from the City Re6or bi4
~6,uwvara, I`igard, Oregon 97223, or by Willing 539-4171. -
- '17C'fps}2PLOrl HALL-
13122-&M b°JI~T 1 .4°il,r ~m
H74I L 13t3?[JLFV BD -LQAPD =Q % S
5tcss U,!,*,tin (Pied Rttek Creek Confeteuce fE~am for.nerFy r as
Town Mall Ce~fereat Roorri)
3J p.rn.
lyxx utiv0 esson: I ie r
® gird ¢b€f Cotsaacil spayo into axe, u
dve Sessiosi unrFer iliaSr(vioaas as6C3RS 132.6p (1),(d)a (e),
(h) ins discslss lata~u relations, r gropety tras:seHioz~s, eitrceesat F
a ~sdpe itlIng litigation issues.
Busistese Meeting (TpiAm Hall)
7-30 prt
i
j d ® Zt Meeting u WI 'i'Wja6n Jal y water District f;
&:30 par l,
a Fulalic Hearing --P, rsible 3olid',Waxte hate Increa c
Local Cortmrt Review Board meeting
i 115,11 lt - z~ ti` a x i, 3;
i
i
f,
i
i
i
_ i
j
6 Council Agenda Item
yr
_I-IGAPD CITY CC)UNCIL f.
MEETING MINUTES - MAY 16, 190-5 ~
Meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m. by Mayor Jim Nicoll.'.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council event into Executive Session under the
provisions of ORS 192.E (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property
transactions, currant and pending litigation issues.
i Executive Session convened into Open Session at 7:35 p.m.
1. QLL CALL
3 Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli; Councilors Paul Hunt, Bob Rohlf, and Ken ~
Scheckla. Staff Present: Bill Monahan, City Administrator; Wayne Lowry, Finance
Director, Liz Newton, Community Involvement Coordinator; Jim Coleman, Legal
_ Counsel; Catherine ~~'heatley, City Recorder; and Ed Wegner, Maintenance
Services Director.
BUSINESS MEETING
1.5 Mayor Nicol called for Non-Agenda items: See Item No. 6 below.
Councilor Bunt brought up two separate items:
a. Sewer systems -referring to the Lake Oswego ordinance with regard to
hook-ups.
b. An easement issue with regard to the Gensman property - Taco Bell.
CKy Administrator Monahan advised that both of these issues would be discussed
at a later date by Council. The first item would be brought as a Council discussion
item and the second item would be delayed until a pending Land Use Board of
Appeals case is resolved.
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA: There were no visitors.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 16, 1995 - PAGE 1
I
J
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
3.1 Approve Council Minutes: May 3, 1995
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded. by Councilor Rohlf, to approve the Consent
Agenda.
Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoll and
Councilors Hunt, Rohlf and Scheckla voted, "yes.")
4. JOINT MEETING WITH TUALATIN VALLEY DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. Cone Seibel of the Tualatin Valley Water District addressed Council. He
reviewed the history of the Wolf Creek Water District which merged with Metzger
'j Mater District in 1531 to form the Tualatin Valley Water District. Presently the
' Water District has water rights for 150 million gallons per day (mgd) on the
Willamette Diver. An application for an additional 251 mgd is pending with the
State.
i Mr. Seibel referred to a research pilot plant at Wilsonville to treat the water. This
-j has been a long, but successful, project.
Mr. Joe Giicker of Montgomery, Watson reviewed the Willamette River Pilot Study.
Mr. Glicker referred to several overhead projector slides which illustrated highlights
of the study. Key points covered included the following:
® Willamette diver is a high quality, good source of water.
` Reviewed the guiding principles for the project.
® Water treatment can provide potable water which is chemical-free and
- j environmentally safe.
Reviewed a conventional water treatment process diagram.
Reviewed treatment goals and established project goals.
The water treatment cost process (optimized filtration) gave costs G
comparable to other facilities and presented water quality benefits.
e Public perception will be an issue; the public is concerned with the quality
of Willamette water.
f CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 160995 - PAGE 2
E
d
j
I
1 {
- L
' • Willamette water, even in its raw state, contains less organic chemicals than
' allowable by EPA standards.
;j
• Tualatin Valley Water is conducting a two-year monitoring project to
a determine duality of Willamette River Water. During the first year, they did
not find anything of great interest to indicate any problems with water
quality.
• Next step is to proceed with engineering tasks.
• ReAewed the layout of the water treatment plant plans.
® dater treatment plant will allow for joint uses: recreational, wetlands
enhancement, demonstration gardens.
• Educational opportunities would be made available.
• Costs for the plant: $33 million for 25 mgd. This cost does not include f.
t
engineering, legal, administrative, or land acquisition costs.
Mr. Seibel described an area they are looking at south of Dammasch, Oregon
where 250 acres of State lands are available for lease or sale. Tualatin Valley
Water District presented an option to purchase 40 acres of the site on May 15,
1995.
Mr. Seibel then described the potential uses for this 40 acre site. He has received
an opinion that the water treatment plan would be a "permitted use" on this site;
in addition, this site is outside the Urban Growth Boundary. There was reference
to other options available for a site if this particular proposal did not work out.
Mr. Seibel noted the study will be completed in the next two to three months the
Willamette Diver is looking better all the time. He reiterated that there is a concern
with the public perception about the Willamette River's quality; the River's quality
will have to be proven to the public. On the financial side, there has been
consideration of a public/private partnership contract.
There was discussion on Tualatin Valley Water District's needs, with Mr. Seibel
noting Tualatin Valley does not need to go to the Willamette River at this time.
However, it is not their intention to hold the water rights; in fact, they would like to
{ share their water rights.
There was discussion regarding what cities might be interested in partnering with
Tualatin Valley Water District. Those cities include Canby, Newberg, and possibly
Wilsonville.
I
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 16, 1995 - PAGE 3
i
i
'i
Council meeting recessed at 8:28 p.m.
Meeting reconvened at 8:49 p.m.
y
} S. PUBLIC HEARING SOLID WASTE RATE INCREASE
The purpose of the public hearing was to review information and take public f'
{ testimony regarding a possible solid waste rate increase. Based on existing
Council policy, franchised solid waste haulers are allowed a rate of return between
j 8% and 12% per year which is computed on gross revenues. The 1994 hauler's f
financial reports, in the aggregate, reported a 7.62% of return. Council will also E
consider enhancing the residential recycling program by adding collection of all No.
s 1 through No. 7 plastic at curbside. E
a. Public Hearing was opened.
b. Declarations or Challenges - there were none.
j c. Staff Report:
Finance Director Lowry summarized the staff report and reviewed options
' presented to Council, "a" through "f."
An additional option was offered for Council review, in response to an
earlier request from Councilor Hunt. This option utilized $15,0001 from
franchise fees collected from the Solid Waste Haulers. (see memorandum
to Bill Monahan from Wayne Lowry dated May 15, 1995 regarding solid
+ waste rate option "f,° which is on file with the Council packet material.)
There was brief discussion by Council; Council also asked some questions
j to clarify elements of the options proposed.
d. Public "testimony.
i Proponent:
Pat Phillips, a resident of Colony Creels Estates, testified in favor of
the proposal. She advised she thinks option Y sounded the most
promising, and hopes that plastics No. 1 through 7 could be
collected at curbside.
r
t IE
h
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 16, 1995 - PAGE 4
i .
3 -
• Opponent: d
t
Enola Coolman, 11150 SW 82nd Street, Tigard, Oregon, 97223,
testified with concerns over being charged for yard debris. Ms.
Coolman advised she recycles all her yard debris and re-uses it in
her yard with the use of a chipper and conservation methods. In
addition, she noted she recycles and does not make use of a lot of
the service because it is not needed. She advised she thought there
.i should be an exemption from those fees that she did not use. She `
questioned why she should have to pay for something she does not
use.
1 e. Council Questions.
Mr. Miller of Miller Sanitary Service responded to questions from Mayor F
Nicoll with regard to drop box rates. This is a non-scheduled service which e
has historically not done very well with regard to rate of return. This is a
"market-driven system." Drop box service is a support type of service for
construction and residential clean-ups; it is a secondary service.
In response to a question from Mayor Nicoll, Finance Director Lowry
advised the drop box service fees represent 25% of the gross income
revenue for the haulers. In response to a question from Councilor
Scheckla, Mr. Miller responded that everything but hazardous materials can
v be placed in drop boxes. The haulers will generally try to recyc°e the j
material that is placed in a drop box.
~
There was some Council discussion on the relationship between
commercial and residential. Currently, commercial rate payers subsidize the E
rates paid by residents. Whether or not this is an acceptable practice to
continue will be discussed at a later date by City Council. In fact, Council
will be discussing a number of policy issues in the coming weeks and will
only be reviewing the rate question at this hearing.
In response to questions posed by Councilor Pohlf, each of the haulers
testified before Council with regard to what they have done to contain costs
and described incentives to keep costs down:
Mike Leichner, Pride Disposal, reviewed the equipment upgrades his
company completed last year; also employee training was provided
for recycling programs and new equipment. ilVith regard to
motivation to control costs, he advised his company is always being
compared to haulers in the area; "personal attitude" and concern of
the image being projected were also factors.
i
j CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 16, 1995 - PAGE 5
i
• Larry Schmidt of Schmidt Sanitary Services also advised of F
equipment upgrades, shifting of personnel to avoid hiring additional
people and a new computer system. He advised that to be efficient,
service needs are reviewed on an on-going basis. He advised his
company reviews the service area to get through the routes faster
l and to avoid wear and tear on their trucks. f
In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Schmidt
advised his company services the Surnmerfield area. The
Summorfield area pick-ups begin at 7:50 a.m. Residential pick-ups
are not begun before 7:50 a.m.
i
Tom Miller of Miller Disposal Company noted replacement of old
1
equipment with new trucks, the addition of voice mail so operators
could respond more quickly, implementation of a drop box
scheduling program for greater efficiencies, safety incentive program,
productivity incentive plan, and office operation restructuring. With
regard to motivation to keep the rates down, he noted the fixed rate
is established once a year and there is some competition with that
rate in order to do Weil as a company.
7 Councilor Schsckla referred to the testimony from Mrs. Coolman, i
questioning if there was any solution for her concern that she was paying
for services she does not use. There was discussion between the haulers
and Council with regard to on-call service. This may be an option for Mrs.
Coolman.
' If a number of people opted not to pay for yard debris and this was
presented as an option, it was noted that yard debris rates would go up to
$7 to $10 a month.
There was discussion on what happens when people leave the area.
Haulers have different guidelines with regard to starting and stopping
service.
f. Public hearing was closed.
# g. Council deliberation: Options were discussed at length, with Councilors
offering different scenarios and proposals for a method to structure a rate.
One underlying principle was that the commercial subsidy to residential
would not be increased to a greater margin than it was presently. Councilor
Hunt noted an issue wherein the haulers sort and reclaim yard debris; any
money made from this activity is outside the franchise agreement.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 16, 1995 - PAGE 6
It was also ascertained that the rate, which will get the haulers to a 10'
aggregate average of profit margin, will also provide that plastics #1-7 will `
be picked up at the curbside.
Legal Counsel Coleman noted the ordinance requires the City to collect a
franchise fee of 3%. If Council makes a determination to not collect part of
i that franchise fee, then an ordinance would be necessary, along with i
accompanying hearings. Mr. Coleman advised if Council does not want to f
amend the ordinance, the City could collect a franchise fee and make a
budgetary decision to rebate it back. This would be a year-by-year
decision.
After lengthy discussion on the options, a proposal was made by Council
for staff to present as an option at the May 23, 1995 Council meeting. This
option is outlined in the motion below:
Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to structure the
rate as foltows: $15,009 in franchise fees would be utilized to offset the total
of $170,000 which is needed to bring the haulers to a 10® rate of return
(aggregate of the three haulers). Drop box rate would be increased by
6.1%. The remainder of the amount needed to get to a dotal of $170,000
would be spirt between an increase in residential and commercial fees.
i Residential would pick up 60% of that amount needed, and commercial
would pick up 40%.
Motion was approved by a majority vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli
and Councilors Hunt and Rohlf voted "yes," and Councilor Scheckla voted
"no.")
I
6. NOM-AGENDA ITEMS
j a. ADDITIONAL RETIREMENT PLAN WHICH ALLOWS CITY TO COMPLY
WITH MEASURE 8.
`j City Administrator Monahan reviewed the staff report. Staff was requesting
9 that Council authorize the City Administrator to implement an additional
401(a) retirement plan with IC►MA-RC to provide for mandatory employee
contributions pre-tax of 65/6, required by the passage of Measure 8.
The City was planning on instituting this additional retirement plan which will
cover City employees who are newly hired or who take new positions within
the City after January 1, 1995. It was anticipated that newly-hired
employees who begin their pension benefits after six months would need
this plan. However, a Library employee was recently, promoted and a deed
for the plan has occurred earlier than anticipated.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -TRAY 16, 1995 - PAGE 7
i
I
I
R
F
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to authorize
6 the City Administrator to implement the retirement playa as presented in the
staff report.
Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoll
and Councilors Hunt, Rohif, and Scheckla voted "yes.") 3 ,
b. FOCUS MEMBERSHIP - 1595/19
Issue before Council was whether Council wished to continue membership
in the Forum on Cooperative Urban Services. City Administrator Monahan k
summarized this item, noting that staff was recommending the City retain f
membership this coming fiscal year, with the understanding we should have
a Council representative or staff attend to make sure we receive the i,
benefits.
Council discussion followed. Mayor Nicoll noted he agreed with retaining
membership for this year, especially with the plan to utilize approximately
i two-thirds of the FOCUS staff resources for involvement with Metro's `
various regional planning processes. He advised he would like to take a
hard look at continuing membership after this year. Councilor Rohlf advised
he would strongly support FOCUS membership this year, also because of
the need to get help with monitoring the process on the plan by
Metro. i
€ Councilor Hunt noted he would probably abstain from voting, or vote "no" i
on this issue. He expressed concerns with the number of organizations
with which the City is involved, and the lack of manpower time to be
involved. 'there Council discussion about concerns with Metro and whether
or not FOCUS would present an effective communication tool. Councilor
Scheckla noted he would not support membership. After discussion,
i Councilor Rohlf and Mayor Nicoll noted they would assist staff when notified
of key meetings, by attending the FOCUS meetings as elected officials.
Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Mayor Nicoli, to continue
membership in FOCUS.
Motion was approved by a majority vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoll
and Councilor Rohif voted "yes;" Councilor Scheckla voted "no;" Councilor
Lunt abstained).
' CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 16, 1995 - PAGE S
1
-I
E.
F
I.
f
C. Cable TV Franchise
Legal Counsel Coleman advised Council that `Tigard is a member of the
Metropolitan Area Communications Commission (MACC). MACC has been
told that TCI Cable Company is in the process of purchasing Columbia
Cable. TCI currently services unincorporated Washington County plug.
portions of Tigard and Beaverton. TCI operates a franchise under a court f
decree with Washington County. A contract is under negotiation with
regard to a franchise agreement with TCI and Tigard. If TCI purchases
Columbia Cable, TCI would be under a franchise agreement with Tigard. '
MACC has been handling TCI issues on behalf of Washington County. It
is estimated that $600 a month is lost in Tigard franchise fees with TC!
operating without a franchise. Past franchise fees that TCl has not been
paying is an issue that will need to be addressed. Legal Counsel Coleman
described the way in which the franchise agreements come into effect.
Through the process of renewals, all franchises would be under the same
agreement by 1999.
Mr. Coleman is coordinating these issues with MACC. Many of the TCI f
issues would be addressed if the transfer of ownership occurs. It is `
anticipated this transfer would occur by July. If not, Mr. Coleman will report i
back to Council. There were no objections by City Council with regard to k;
Mr. Coleman's recommendation that the negotiation for the TCI franchise,
as it currently is doing business in Tigard, be set aside until it is determined
whether the purchase of Columbia by TCI will take place.
d. Mayor Nicoli noted he would like Council to meet with Bruce Warner, the
Regional Manager for the Oregon Department of Transportation. Issues of
concern include the following:
(1) Conditions put on land use applications that circumvent proper
notification to citizens.
(2) Allowing Tri-Met to install shelters which violate ADA criteria. In
addition, there is not sufficient access around power poles where f
these bus shelters are installed.
(3) Concerns about the Tigard Triangle Study and ODOT's comments
relating to impacts on Highway 99. r
Consensus of Council was that such a meeting with Mr. Warner would be
good, especially if it could be held prior to the discussion on the Tigard
Triangle.
G
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -BRAY 16, 1995 - PACE 9
- J
i
r.. e. Mayor Nicoll advised he has been asked to testify on a bill proposed by
Representative "rom Brian with regard to allowing the State highway to enter
into public lprivate partnerships. The,,s was discussion regarding the
potential of toll roads." Councilors Scheckla, Rohlf and Huraa advised they s
would not be opposed to Mayor Nicoli testifying; however, they would not
want such testimony to be on behalf of the City, as the Council members
were not necessarily in favor of a toll road or would want to support this
E
idea as a Council.
f. Mayor Nicoll referred to today's election results (preliminary results obtained
i by a telephone call to the Elections Division shortly after B p.m.) in
Washington County. He noted the MSTIP Metro Greenspaces and the
j school bond appeared to have passed. E
g. There was some discussion on the Greenspaces program. Councilor Hunt E
clarified he would want to review the minutes to make sure the park
included in the Greenspaces would not have to be on Bull Mountaln. He 4
noted his concerns with providing improvements near the island area at this
j time, adding they should not continue to receive benefits offered by the City
without being part of the City. Councilor Hunt noted it was his belief that
Council was very careful not to approve an area which would be binding on
the City if the Greenspaces bond measure passed.
h. Mayor Nicoll noted that with the passage of the School District bond,
perhaps the School District would now be able to assist with funding for a
traffic light on Durham Road. Councilor Hunt advised he believed the City
was still waiting to hear whether or not the State would approve such a
signal.
7. ADJOURNMENT: 11:03 p.m.
Attest: Catherine Wheatley, City Record r
. M r, City of Tigard
j
Date: 5 /36 f ~t 5'
exxn~v9E.~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 16, .1995 - PAGE 10
f
i
r
W _ = - -
~ z
E
AGENDA M O.. 2 - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE: v 16. 1I MS
1 -
(Umited to 2 minutes or less, please)
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on
other Issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff.
Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
STAFF `
NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC CONTACTED
I
a
i
1 r
l
1
1
1
j
4
j
l
1
i [depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount ~
(tea of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 8 - 5 minutes. The Chair
may further limit time it necessary. Written comments are ways appreciated by the Council to
supplement oral testimony.
f
A EA ` DATE: May 15, 1995 f
PUBLIC HEARING - SOLID WASTE RATE INCREASE
The purpose of the public hearing is to reviews information and take public testimony regarding
a possible solid waste rate increase. Based on existing Council policy, franchised solid waste
haulers are allowed a rate of return between 8% and 10%® per year which is computed on gross
_ revenues. The 1994 haulers financial reports, in the aggregate, reported a 7.62% of return.
Council will also consider enhancing the residential recycling program by adding collection of
all #1 through #7 plastic bottles at curbside. I
t-
j r
1 iFF
I
f
d PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS
F
~ j
1
j '
s E
j.
F
j f
1
-1
a
i f
1 AGENDA, M O.. -
M 1 PL SE PRO_
Proponent - (Speaking In Favors Opponent - (Speaking Against)
rasa reps Nam
i rasa
j re88
t I
j N~~vea Name
_ I
Address Address
Nye Name
Amddreess Address
I~arese Name
Ad raw
Address
j Name r
_ Nsme ~
y t
Name Name
Address
- f
Iwm® Name...
Address Address -
Nems
Name
dress E Address
i
i ~
Narm Name i
r ~
teas 6@88
i
Name Name
I `J
Address ; Address
l
i - k
1
I
ff
f
a
r
P SE -PRIN'T'
Proponent - (Spearing In Favor) {opponent - (Speaking Against)
e Name
i
~ r
f
e me ~
~ ram Address 'r
Name a
I `
Name
F ress Address
i rams
Nma
tLddross ~ctdreas ~ , ,
i
- Addres Address G
Nama Name
Pddr~s Address
1
;+4eana Name
rasa Address E
i
i
{
t
i
i
f
k
f
s , AGENDA ITEM # or)
For Agenda of a is 9?a5 - -
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA, ITEM SU TAR,Y
i ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Focus Membersh.in 1995196 ~
! E
PREPARED BY: C. Wheatlev DEFT BEAD OR CITY ADMIN OR
ISSUE BEFORE THE COOLQU
Does council wish to continue membership in the Forum on Cooperative Services f
(FOCUS)?
STAFF RECO,teNDATIO
Retain membership this coming fiscal year with the understanding that we
should have a representative from Council or staff attend to make sure we F.
receive benefit. We have not had representation for quite some time.
1
INFORMATION SUP~SARY €
Attached is the invoice for 1995/96 FOCUS membership. Also attached is the p
Draft Management Plan outlining the direction for the FOCUS group next year. ~
.~.FOCUS is the result of a_conference of elected officials and managers held in
'1990 (Timothy Labe). At that time, they wanted to establish a framework for
creating a neutral forum for regional (Washington, Clackamas and Multnomah
Counties) general purpose governments and special districts to work together
i on common issues. t.
E
As stated in the attached Draft Management Plan, approximately two-thirds of
Focus's staff resource will be devoted to much closer involvement with
% Metro's various regional planning processes. This would address one of the
j suggestions recently made at a joint Council/Planning Commission meeting to
coordinate the local jurisdictional concerns to give input to Metro.
The deadline for notifying McKeever Morris for membership is June 9, 19958
payment can be made after July 1 the new fiscal. year. This amount has
been submitted in the proposed budget.
ALTERNATIVES TO CONSID'~2 j
1. Approve participation for the upcoming fiscal year.
2. Discontinue membership.
i
FISCAL, NO'T'ES
i Annual dues for 95/96; $5,500.
haelog in\cas:hy\focus. eaN
-1
j
1
-k
MIT'
L-.
McKeever/Morris, Inc.
722 S. W. Second Avenue
Suite 400
Portland, Oregon 97204
fax 503 228-7365 c
503228-7352
INVOICE ~ ~ ? 4
APR 23
Date: April 18, 1995
To: Bill Monahan, City of Tigard
From: Mike McKeever, FOCUS Staff
RE: INVOICE FOR 1995-96 FOCUS DUES ~
- - -
This is an invoice for services provided to the City of Tigard by the Forum on Cooperative
Services (FOCUS) for the period of July 1, 1995 to June 30, 1996.
Amount Due: $ 5,500.00
The level of service for this amount is based on the same level of service for the current 1994-95 ;
year. Enclosed are a description of the draft 1995-96 Management Plar. and summw of the
l 1994-95 FOCUS accomplishments.
Please discuss this year's memberslup with your governing board. If you would like a
~ b
presentation on FOCUS to your board, please give us a call. The deadline for notifying us of
j your, mmembership status is Friday, June 9, 1995. You may do this by calling Greg Chew at 228- i
7352.
Send the dues check to:
FOCUS
c/o Citv of Tualatin, Finance Dept.
P.O. Box 369 , .
Tualatin, OR 97062
Again, please give me or Greg Chew a call at 228-7352 if you have any questions.
r
4 ge.HD.95-96 _
166-1995-96mtigard
i
f f
i I
- f
f
~ Planning m.i
Pitbtic Involvement i
€ Project Management
Landscape ArcWtecture J
- -
161~1 1-11 Y ,;,j
v - ,a r - O-.
71
Akg
rM WITO
Rz "F
a Y F - ayt - s -a+ S s
-t' _ Sii~ # f r'
*t'ar -
jMN
'max - a.a - .ri - - so x
mi MW
talaetel tlz tan twctnsisu etaterf ;
WO 'e
s , .
slensrin uteZOta
" ;IS
-P mrp
aowp,
z ~s c
{arzav.t~1ot2rtx sit okey, a ; ESd
O ~ o t ve nent tt3:;on2 €o et ° ` a + , t a ~i ro anin+ ckszcj
Of,
_ --s: - - - - _ _
c1 d e ac's a a ra has t a very ~ ~z 1~S's~~sii;dy- of tot~t *ater r ~o ces w
gave addition & one.
` rrtrs j ntf , CU member ve e1*-,ted xo a day urnrkslxop d
urces
L f e tie `z pz~ g co t ent to totat grater reso in ire t
}ffi'tI"+ 111?
k t 106, o r fan t tT ' 3'ror s noa~t mast a ecttvrlY Ibe pt sa ed
x
Y
ou t r ks Savo e Mere a caima #ci t€~tal water resource
i na emen d C rrm Y` d3 cu sin the 'oest to zr`IP ememt that ca€nzr izn ttt
ieHAiiN 'o .1,
_de ' ~ actdtpo~g t€efse€itar,s Aso, i put t0
load umby cr dOZI PC 9ovei er t p rsf n to fiil1~ r le ntatxa t to t to
North acka~ e.
akm cca
v~ No ,"T t cu pinm ce co ttee 3s`cots ntazn tc, stetO the feast ili of
aiid
e uhc ovece Tiandc deqtot tex,
re;xor f°au caps tsn it€'^t zr
i e C teii h ked r qn 961vt s v~#Iz re ouat rict:u ec s a ef3 c e €sst rc~-
ndtq ro e s csg ai s ad t s issue Alog is t e , C °s s" of regional recreation
pct JQ;Mj fael IUes:,.
a $fraerl er~tela~ cozdurted ati det stud ejusticejn se -q
aII s t t sir the he .em rs ip meeti Teat r #
AND'
SCHQ CALO b GVEWOWNT COO B TIs of e ht
~ f o
4 t c tta p di3 s f d s6wssed zol6i gar sc r r2s n 'lbc i d use Is atuqi~
u as t o z ' t sttao is~ste :Finance 3 coo zt tids it etweeil sc a + erg uts d
sca j
cevi de ! angel td, scho 1,finahct_ vere € Scus-st: zd e6i4 5 as 6r ng 7-7 ri t the.
~sir€ t an the r6 to d INIpird €ts itsu e Riau h tF i ee s d~ a the tonC, t to adequate Y
eet:s need,b 9 h :the f it
J of the send ye ice} t'co-sso~ tie Le E
tled
" rt to k ih ' ° 1`dr ~c ra a ttstt do s yd's kq6 f ence js ti,
~€c~ atars o ity anl3catz~,~ g
NUT-t
'nom _ ?__-x i_- it t 4' -a. i - -
~ a8w- PF.~wmww.~P^~:ln'1'^fll^'^"^ d.^, 4^>~^°Ip:s -r
- - ~ - .
RM tco- , - N _ -11._1- ~ z
C
; .'A u-N4 g,";_. , ~ ~ ,,e',~_--,, ~ - ,
t €
-M ate ~_a x w? V,.,w
f ~ t
- - ' , I iaaai e t ye a i 9~ thx a yaaaae 30 i )his been s$ €aafi by
~ e a c e ~ nt t nipo r a m r`s rur
r a
3 te3~t s £1 ot~, staff re s aarces 'svaii,i e of d to mph ci€ see aaa qi~e
4 ,t3 - - - - -
~xth d*cas reaa pittntaln processes, and -
rkieai elite, tctsacs of the ~rsr€it£a' foie rax€aatyec gene mrsp
n s aia to ',pa s~°aa~s acz And A in t of tiaY:ei issues a csn~ the mner ,S W
dd1dbJn, jja. tags r ed tox the FOC-U ` ove aa.ce scam g ina ~ stxzs rY caz u e s Wig Co
a e I US N- 11 A ain ccq §pgiv . a ria~ L eadersYa,p r"€~nfexe~ce ~~ath the i~~artiaaa~ State ~ni~°~~s~t~
Y tftiOd -tro -0 taaoaes
- - ~vaai xican rn ' ratacai r€ tia aaaa ean€nt d is~ons d€a xa she e t axtpnths, aac ttd
4 Pf *b tai 2 lap ~JaG ~ menu, conside ¢io"n bfthang s the_ 7 b an
~~jlistia =haz serv xtaazat s~f eras `Tags
:Re , ae~€aa za ew~,€~rk p n cccaa~t naed cii iig es a the - 11
po tiaoi i t app tie st f tiae t
3oaatadcsaasrah t~perz spacrouiaaa-th iiht rnal* management nd f aoag f
4 _ d ~siccs a alto on the €t~u.i t
S~ ' lie, Aik of these lssaaes ~ h~~e ~ r^~ic~ pact ion 11 ovemme es th ougiaa~t th° r~~ip~a rseed tai ~ p
anf€~asaae€ ~d oscteiyprcr-ctaeiy iravoicsi sn re;ion] -Ian,p~rea iesar r~. _
gaar at €r t *s `anc3 et~cted as iiaxis' tiixae T CVS iL tale9 ttci oar nctive;toi , dk-heiping' .
I
to ~iSsen an is` ni~rination zd, i-66fitnte m ;Otto z -~p,° r aa~ai aisc6s~i a.n and c~z~tse-ns~s tta ttan - x. i 'i'iae i as icy incr~a e b€~th the tfi ie4cy s e tectave~icss af ui~roiI xa~enfi in se aoaaai, issaaes 11 I
i
U V1,U 6066, aaa t wash ik"#~C (i~~etr slat :i~pacy''Advas€~ry C'omini ) to estai~iasii keggu iar
€~r as ntt' tioaa r r'dos" to ensw- thag t seiy communication occurs-bet zi these two pnr3~nt _
E i~raxa
_ - ~ - fF 1 - i - - -
ti *t ri c',wok k W i .1 aliciii& d round of b efin s ~tttii aid i; e r elected i~ee on '
t y r' pa it t crr on TW Mater ests ~ avian <s ciaient Maas wv , .p to:erzsu that t or ,b 1, ii a~~a~as die grad f it€a l p cta itaes arc. untatiate asap p site ~ a#;mod ax~ttee
M, ~ ri c6ntania~ td shy r6 vita fiaa ee issues, p acacia y as tiaeg~ reiha to the funding of re .o al
- rae ek, e` n a some 1taepf ; i-av expressed": re en for t rt=eNttia t ati y{ 3fi
'f :a wn nas r Ct- I cs€ lags aisd re or~nd chaa a per eat: tr etzn pJ h
~ ~ d- . - c at -f ~c °rsase _ k ~ mashes t =us t s saes t - -en ~ 1 i~ n ~ c ,b, hap ee~ V_ an -
d e, nate to h~ air'
fie s ,
i
1 { •
AGENDA ITEM
For Agenda of May 16. 1995
.CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON {
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE SOLID WASTE RATE ADJUSTM NT HEARING
"y PREPARED BY: W. Lowry & L. Mills_ DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK*&L t
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL -
Consider a solid waste rate adjustment and the addition of #1 through #7 plastic bottle recycling at residential curbside based
on existing Council policies.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommendation, in keeping with the current Council policy, is to adjust rates to bring the haulers up to a 10% rate of
i return in the aggregate by approving Proposal A or E. Proposal A would have the least overall impact on any one service
- line with a slight increase in the commercial to residential subsidy. Proposal E would allow for a slight decrease in the
commercial subsidy of the residential rates.
j`
INFORMATION SUMMARY E
On 4/25/95, the Tigard City Council requested staff schedule a public hearing for May 16, 1995 to consider a solid waste rate I
_ t increase. This was the result of the 1994 haulers' aggregate financial reports showing a 7.62% rate of return. City Council's s
existing policy allows an 8% to 12®lo rate of return in the aggregate. Further, the policy states that if the rate of return falls
below 6% or exceeds 12%, the rates should be adjusted to achieve a 10% rate of return.
' The City is also reviewing when to expand the residential plastic recycling program from milk jugs to collecting all #1 through
#7 plastic bottles with necks. A plastic market for this material is now open in Salem. Other jurisdictions in our area will be
adding this program sometime between 7/1/95 and 9/1195. Another existing Council policy states that "future service
enhancements should be reviewed prior to implementation after the haulers demonstrate what affect the increase service will
have. on the business" to determine whether a rate adjustment is necessary before adding the service. Mr. Tom Miller, owner
of Miller's Sanitary Service, commented at the 4/25 Council meeting that if Council would adjust the rate of return to 10%, he
' didn't believe an adjustment for the enhanced plastic program would be necessary.
At the 4/25/95 Council meeting, Council's direction to staff was to develop rate adjustment alternatives that would:
r o achieve a 10% rate of return for the haulers (in the aggregate); and
• not change the commercial subsidy of the residential rate structure.
{
Below is a listing of five alternatives for Council consideration to achieve the 10% rate of return for the haulers in the i
i aggregate (see fiscal notes for affect on the commercial subsidy of residential rates). Attached are rate comparisons for
garbage service and drop box service in the region and a sypnopsis sheet of proposals A - E as compared to regional
averages, two letters received from citizens regarding a possible solid waste rate adjustment; a letter from the haulers dated
4/18/95, and a copy of an Oregonian article (dated 5/9195) regarding City of Portland rates and plastic recycling plans. Also,
attached are five resolutions, one for each proposal option.
j_
i
I
Q_-
' Tigard Mayor & City Council, page 2 ~
t
Finally, the proposed residential rate of $18.15,i: an
overall increase of 2.8%, which compares favorably with
- the current; cost of living, at 2.9%. It remains below the
actual cost of residential service, but would move toward
-i reducing the commercial subsidy. E„
We appreciate your consideration of this information, and
would be pleased to work with you to resolve these matters.
i
Yours r•t ly
7 Michdel Lei.chner
Thomas Miller-
Larry Schmidt
i
i
i
i
a r
f
3 j
f
j
S
7
i i
t
N
DC"'UrY:kj
-I
i
ARE OF POOR
:i
L
..a
AL
c
-77 l 1 ,
k
f
i I -
-1
1. C
i
I i
E
I
t ~ ^".:3~.1 u~: t;~df"~~°s; q•, f ~'t a~~i;^ : t r"~. , ~i , i:S::l.:•..;:-. k F
,r., ~,.t' .i,~r,3e-_ •_,°,',~.~.1`I `'ke:^'4 T.'~,i." _3 -is. ».L.-..
IN i"~~ i' ttifi,l~.t~ ~~s k `'a;'e
s ry (r gg5't q.. r,i t r§Si`a r i 4:t~.x sr a' "
R a
'
i 1 r a '`i='„,si' § r~'x' ,K~ ~f~' y t • L r 4 y ni.n',r. ~ y ~
t r- 9'x0.. s ,r4,i t-ta `S~ a yra,, r wtayKr:',.4h1 s. - tft'"3 ~rc,> k+,~K, ~Y'i '
~ .i. ~,%ti` t
1 ~ z r p rr s Y r~ ~t tt'f 'tL t~ a - s rte{ a $ y1tttN E u, c ~n~ ~ ( k
! f t rt r fix }'u •xs'ts+ *r;~ lhks N.5 ; - 7 S t•;- .:x 1 f' 4 k
-AG
r LAS ;P~ 4 -^h ,`ANNE
~
b a<Mill
,
7 k t f
`FV. {{7t f,
3 ,5 G
r- ~ j E ! '
1 ri' ''n, v, rtt i,. _=Y.'.x{ +s"'t r _ vl {$"'73ee't~X` 7S,vu`1;4ff `.RC'000asBEGH1El/TFke 0r64UttEo^31,
a -:AultddzeiVP ' qe l% ei3~~e.asou~d °l ld unCoad®tlle:,m,truck 4brle~~l~a rntE~isr~lan~1'~S~ tl~"~~ tl,offis®rc tio`s
Rod coun4l
ti • a Y tc -fi • y,„ a;. t >t,t~ .ste+., , ° -et t' . # 1r t : Jil t . It ee'neaetft-1I' taet ra adli psd'1> max~area~~~;yari,com~ d 1°~ "dl
x f~`L l ~1 a+
;1 uO tmpl
y~n
a, ~ 1.; llb N -•fr~y+, r-:' r'9t v,. ~ 4..km•~?ap::r+i.°ky~",,; ~i;f°a~.^.d~.{r - ➢ o, ~ 7 _
1 e~ E gar . sa ~ i.F t ~ y!
Ni
M
1t~
~5 ' I• t. - ztt.46~ip uS's~7+'~ -nr.jir a
g i t^,~ 4 ai4 t ~J rt3 s~ -`s F
t.'2 i
_ ~'x~t i, ra x r'~@~-i~~ N Sp0:
'#1 1 •.r. FYri~y14t s"a vs5~ a yT.Yf t i {
3c..A F0@.o,..,1. ~a~8~."a~,w~^~-°:.'•cir~o.~BCVICBu.etiC.~t..4 7f i t'1 t
f
s
i 4.i k ~ 11 t- Y 1J,la> ~i 7~
t r YN' N .e.• r
'?x° '•~~CBS f9P3d; to°€va+.k3ytfAE6r Rt'+~ :a~.~r It®E1~;b ~$td cSl. j~rgdrdebrisl
t
I~~tkr '
--Two,
v~: «L'ski Px>¢Sn'§ ~.~'ti~.a,.~,.t i t~.~%a,.~.~ u u..t.~ .kr.r~',:•: ~.~.i...
! r ~ s _ s~ ~i`i ~ ~.xm~4*~~ L r '^,s • _ ~ ~ ms's '~S ~ ~ ,i
1 l~`2y1 ~t ~ t ~ 71 t i~"'tl ~..`1 ~ dk~~ ~ i 4, i k -:r~s" e " 1 r n
se v €~7 i
yF " 1 x*"'- 6~9 1 J r~ 1~:1'. t rL~ , No
~
LIMiL L . ~..i w, 4~ yT~!u~i'" , ,~~,yr..~•; ,%e.: >;.°iltt~t`:
i
e1 s rt..s :}s fr .4at s +a e
i 3~td.l;.' irk y tJii ~•~;k"'srSti'.f, jryr`,e'as1,': ,.;:F t;URrt~ly.!9yr.'6=$'' g:8~: afU i 1 d U30t1 -
T.fvs,. ...3' , 3r,Ot , li~...,•'f' '+„:,tll sr(.1~t2 9. .~~tVY~ 2, 4V89~(~7r; .r; is t[
?d .rtt};..i f'i ~p...~.
a,i { '.nit.,^el,a~;'s''{ ~ 3!?a~:, `if. ra.. }~.~:.9Y ~:1;, s.. ,,„i. '~}~t'1`~,. . (V2 ~~IInI~C "8C11'dBbfiS'y",'•~'r,'e..
,;.t~~ ~ _ ikr ~x.~r~ • ~i3>. c FtW .~,~...,z"'S:. r;,; `>xS~:': ~,;~t~'.. v~: dt:; 3,;..:RY,, d,Y . -'1,...1.~,;<:",..
,Yy;~'~~;".y .s,, .,~Tfi*..,,4.,:':~~t:.»,. _ n~r..».r xr.'.r...:~...tk4p'. 1,~?,a
i . f 1' r :
{;®T~9e'P®731q1d .'!BYT.R. GREGORY.tdOtCE$
' k" of,;lYes;QregonlanstaNwr~:+., ? x' r.~u~'~~~:
~~.'.5..'ft i.~~+ll. uy..+ROi.n trr, c'^r• r, f'~ *`~:.FC.~~s,.~.ti~<~"`a-•~ak",'i.•~i'
'~i`~ >z r.= r,3 "i Sacramento , 21-$38• 1~;50~' 90=`~ailon e.
p i ddeb
:,~„~:.~~r~=r.=;~.~~•:~sr~s.,~,y=~i,4.~~~~•.~~~~d~.~g,•4~.~~~`y;:~!~.m
z > i q~S' hat rG 'Tortland-gregkoupeIA?idsofpay pore any t Q
VI1~11 13riall ~0 18Trw@St@I II C1t1e8 i ! .,.b . r tx - F-5 F r ° tis ae}r~ 1 7? a s
"thdri i is
"`:ofc k`' ff 3,f is 4 . r Y Y'. r~it a u
~f~rjppr~,ry°tag,rra.' compai'ab7e.~s~ze 'including;`San,.^s' `;San-Jose: $7#sy~,f$1a3~t allo~]samesk~6simJ~Aweek ebrls6
i°+".'b' a t1 k• _ ISfi T->z~ , P ~~43
tiP V`,®lx1:~l IY®p(l
,v ti ~krancisco; Sacramento-d.0akland:
uv'aegd'%v ;tf. ; s >J.tir as t ' ~t a s St
s~--~~831~$1!®z Portlaniiers~pagM~J.7f60imonthly'.for,. ~t :i~S
tern] = " ~weekly~pickuP~;of a'32 gaUon:can;;in ice. w - ~ J OW
'h f
:'i 5~+.wn3k3'4?!i.,~,; n.L1y{>•g.fi.In t . t f{:+. t FiY w.ts `ir. r,£ ti 5 'L
ty ip. :a ~tt2~r fi. }ti
. luc1ingky'ard,;detiris.and'ec;'
Yc7abies i a K 4
x'r~S?Elfi 1r, „~l Poster°co d~br°a°C® ti, a=
k0, is t<d1-vs; i~ . R6 d8ritS'ifieTO 2 ~IDOrL;', 'E CII,- 3 id,' ` t
satitiA Cid`!'`t'~;r t!.""""."' 1' `tz'n y'T° p" ak'
rn, ~,ar;.4r,S23t`tle, ~altliou fSeaftl f~ _ r.,
~ ,~a:~ .,a .•i gl?, „1'i COSt`.IT10T@;. '4I'a(BShSITI'~-.Gd.r" .ysa 4{ 4~~18.115s:cf~ ~st'~,+x'.r Ars'~ ~ixts;~it_ r; s" t
r-`:P'*,~t{`tc>ftgyhfer'Add112~8dd1tl0IIa~yar(~°@I'V1C8
C t r r'' a of $ 4 i,r t' ~'S ' "t° t 1 -'t .y t t. ..Vlla
f 9 d~ k L tt;5 1 1F' S as I' ~"?'t~ 7 9' - 4
ef,cuiprit
j gtrt{ fy 20-Yearscon= ; stiirigt ton Cofl
t }ti'^'. tYe. tn:,k;,r. z-3¢etr'11@:Cal a tz s,
u urlln~ ;
~f sr y a ;pon i .by~;tlie`MEtro' overnmen r~'. r,
Y g~. !
tttecregion''s'~,gaib3max
C~x PRO
#art r r "rules u the,Columtiia CP ilwauwe~ , r : s krj,i~$17.25~ .r,,ed' z s z F r,
p River rge.at.:b_t
+y c t f`r' « r ,7 • jl'.ra AI'l1IIgt011.;~ ~e rCOII~T&Ct. ; loC1S5 ~r;the ~ {,'a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~u~~~~~~.-c.,. „r ~ ~ r
,.;,.u=td a~ ! i , srxPortland area into;pia landfill dis ; ~:Sand~:, •,$16:80 ~no'debris?r . ixtzsr . .k. .
,543' ; t .r at'I~`' r~i+'',~.`.,'O"ini:pOSaalrAtE3rtthat ar8.Il0,Ff.,abO~Ut La,pEI;~q. r
CIS ' t t~}~ aCt 3S 1nC2Tlt'.~ $11ET,'•thdllt110 ~Y89te111 Suter rif mi f4.~+KnT ,;,rs± J.r.Sb d Ii't~
rtY.ry •a, t'C" "':-t.#ESL, T^r i A,'~ ° 4'"'x`'3
~~~.~.rr •~s,of~J~ne
♦ rat ~ rI C` i':;1 .:6~x •~Fr ~1 j'Ei srdi" „r..r. ~,f
a s f F t { s z~w~ yen ~3~<~iW ,f .t}~, ~ ~ t ®~'p"~'y"/~t~~~*SW, ~@.lS7iptOpn ~ Ow.
, i fi ,t tk ~f ~ L+`i,f,iiL~iG ~'7 4Y~. f iti ®R~GgRa63~nai~~~@ f9'9•0' yt1 ,1 7
v..
1.
i
i
,
t i
,T
p' `r r'' liefmal
J 1r• L-.,~.
fcontinusd 9rom PaG .ii } ;
3 age It+was effechvs in iS90 and hws ry-- x '
no renegotiation requirement LA41iFlLL Tt nbla R(dga landti 1 at Arlington ri bQift for Metro alone 4
;Consider[ng tt a: circum5tanres although Metro paid i uch ql the cost Othor cube dumping here Include Seattle'
t ent contract st;tlie t } x+ F .,e r« rt + { it Kennewlok Wh(dt,s andarlo Pudman in Washlnpia scow and Bonner Cowl'
It was an excell
In Idaho; and Sherman antl GHllam count(es in Orvg?n ' r v'{ •
time ime lt;,yvas signed',gaid Jon:gA , .i l d~Ii a : , ty",
ad„the ` 4letro couttclkor yin i 1, r r: x t ; y , : At 2,000-*ms Columbia Nidge was the tlrstreglonal landUlf in the raglan and is , f
charge; of ,waste issues; With bens- Portland residents could.see a said to be large enoLgh to tjandie the ragiPn s garbage for 50 years: It is owned by
d+ of 20.20 hindsigtst, therel are ` smalldrop in their, garbage 'Oregon Waste Systems Ina w ~rhngton a subsidiary of Waste Management Inc Oak E
ed + t k r our -Il F.
14, 'things;'d~11ka to;see'clang P
I ekup fee. , i Brook !II , # 1 e „;t ?7 I S 51, i
'Surew,,paidtoomucti;butwhat of }•.iCommissioner Mike Lind ®g{}Mph(qf1}tdTher°arenowthrsootherregronallandhils, RlverbendinYamhiild' '
z the risks?; What ifit didn't work? , taerg te-eicpected to'announce a County, cwned by Sanffill Inc: of Houston; Roosevelt Regional Landfill at Roosevelt; i E- -
4 The, contract with Oregon Waste 10-cent drop, in monthly rates Wash owned by Rabanco Ltd of Seattle, and the Finley Buttes Landfill near. Board
j Management looked :good atr;,the fbr.,curbside coll echan of a 32 man owned by Tidewater8arpaLinesofVantxwyer.' y a
time be ,ause the region was desper 41 I gallon can r
ate io find a place to`,dttmPtita'ga? current'moA y. rate as 0 MEMO: Metro runs the iegional waste d(s jowl system(JThe system includes the,. F
o her near
bag Only West-- i • agement ar x17.60 for.the`east'side, $19 30 two Metro-owned tmhifer statons one in Northwest PoNand and the o
garbage;dis' I grant out of Chita F for; the west, side:' The_ n2 Oregon City plus transp6rraUon py ppvatsiy operated trucks.140 miles up the C~'
go ,£tTered,a'solution; apropel i jgallon. r an fa+used by,about t t' yluinhfaRtverGrge oArlingt anddtspOSalatthelandfill [
'.J osII t ofthea Enlandflll,et Ar half thecity's"residents Cbrbsidecollection srepulat ¢y localpoverltments;whic~setiheratesfarttiein;?, t
. # I ~'Mozi y:rates for: single !dependenthaulelswhotakethegaragetothebansie~rstatlanswheretheyaro ? t`
1 But flvo;•years later: what lookea family residents in:'Portland chat9edadumPmgtee calledaU pingfss 4 v'
1 1Lke araugar plum mny be+tuining include weekly curbside gal ®~FPINt3FE~Th°ttppinglee~sSZ5a,ton highesilntheWestandthreetimeslhe S
nto a lemon at least forsconsumsrs , bege # at_,iL recycling collection "rate fP Sacr3manto and San Oose From that fee Metro pays the costs of the system i t
3 i?ortlandFdty officials are relied 8ndbiweeklycollection'of;one including about $2Z itonto,WastebtanapementandSl4atonto;JackGrayTrans:? t
1 uled toamiounoea`emall decrease ~
' , bag or bundle of yard de-
tn rates %zTuesday am°unting _to r b r y port Irm the trucking fifth The jae also mciudes a7 5 percent excise taX currently:e
Izghfly more tlum,lO cents a month ~n r t , r $512 r t ,i:?i: rt`s°, i1Ti i, r t ~z1;, * } tar , IS, c
There,may also be an inemase•in ®THEURBRGE.TireamquntofPOrgar6arsapageheadedtoArlingtonhasBops
Jbagt ofryard,or i upsteadily_s?ncathaprstloads4asdelfveredJan 1 1940 MetroseM757000 on5~
rvlce anothi*
hrls every two weekgrand pa3ibly ] r6e':enough to. erve all of the Pa- lastyear,aridproJectc77.4,000m1995?`
adding`plasllcstotheElistrccycl ciH13 No tat., t`for 5O Years:,The Recycled materials do nofgotothelandbllbutarotakentoIndividualrecyGmg`cen ,
I ablematerlals lieY~mighibe115yeurs 5 JackG yTiausport which also lets t !6 ir'i eyjh ll , 2 r ,i{A ` i Y v , a
But 4 arrv l6t r ru s- a~ ~r v1G Y a ,1# i t.
afinY h.: (1:3 4 d• "-°'nuiiA ~s d:ki ` has a.2o-year contract wit}i':Metro ~t;. r 3 a it~it 1sal s of . fix, t vrxx5 , ire ~ ~ +l ,ss i~t( ".rf l
V for which it's paid about$14'a ton
etro which managesahe region
at oarbage ystemjjwill Pay;Waste Disposal°costs "account::for abou4 Cus as agrees4rates}are hag}~ nut especially since there s+nathing a
k..
j Managenientarba$about `$2T as jtgn§fora},25'pereentofa Portand~household s <;'she said We ryere against th fwa L r9>?izzng K sere Management" o`ie
t umping'Be ate Arlfn6 onrthisr. garbage feeLocal governments rag ,We had tq closelSCITOhna a dfdn'tF, spend zx t ,(,r q `
ear•about $6 Mors than°the ests ulateitthe curbside collection and 'haveal6tof'6i6fes; 'Gvtage~dtssigsal bAig,business
ern averagerof about $21 says Bob rates,inthePortlandazea , Jfithea~n r1lFCttaiag afe d nd ni? @r a~O.t~pabrie` 'blg$er
i Martlnlformer'head ofroasts die cs S~Burton~fand "otherj,3cntics thwf It peas ie~l f4 ris td {}sW ka agsnnpt etha;pa k
f r W to ssagem t
al for tries?Metro regaonaL govern 41 itid lost an opportum for signit o obovy hoedsd ak a H°ut 1A ° ~
I j nf 3, `iuY 4 t t' nOl lowetrdisposal costs`last yea I3ti{~there~are"nxwldesP +f~?~ OC~ 09¢anngal~global~revenueFf
I bi11t enreetrAlPS~rer} 14000 t
s _ end G hentrihe exccatlvan•Reilb, tsma t :ti hether'suchTsaving$ ou d eve t o
~
y Metr-4 id3 ~,JnBli9n to{-. n 7 mYSI 1`R h[la eamuch asf10 iI7 7n7 000. tons o~Agarpage to~lrlington l~traded away a rate protection clause tial a mate'Ial~'ed since Y,asW ?en e
: last year:'If itw?re.paying less it tin the contract:The clause.had guar : `agement thmatened t° build a hex l ercent',af the Snaklon:s garbage:tIt
woiiWhave~saved;$45 m111fonfor t~antegd Metro .the same low rates landflll'at`fAdams CountylWash `If v¢nGt'disclose !ta Prof}tsillomrthe
about.halt,"3 ffi6_nth s 6arwe'feepf°r aanyorie elso±rece.ived at thd;Arlmg ',Waste ManagameRiiI ad iiada,&cd Met?o contract not even to Metro.',
en,, president pf
eve PoiTland a.;e`a. housshPld ton]iintlfllls"uch as Seattle r ¢ ton its threat 41etm would have ie (DUUglas V 5Ccen
t TheneyrgoadbfMetro+MllcaB n WfriiYcalculates,Seattle"' ill ' '•.coi- 'nothing,-no lobateazrdno Oregon%s` ante,<Systems;,doesp't
ton saidiit'r time tod6 somethingPaYtig about,$2 a ton, less than ..rata reduction ; ilrr tS«i, s ' think Metro p ys'to° much and says ' i
I, about the high costs ' Mincluding an x Metro beginning next years Instead I nk Waste yManagemeiit the way we loot. at the numbers,
a+templ fo renegotis th a.yFaste f ama opted for other.cc,, io ns oul
wd move heaven and earth to h!11 hstenx4o'Burttt n s`pcoDosaJs,
Management ,contract wbich kinclu3ing a $11150 rebate;to Metro y -avoid > givinB Metro signiffcantlY ?y r . `
doesnt:;eupirei until{2010';Wastef,,for';every tom°of Seattle;gazbage •lowerrates;Martins`aid.rc a bet',Coenen wonders rf Waste'M3n- E
i Managiinent officials u say . they ll t'tnken to Arlington In a coming vote t1ie;Metro Coup agement were'losing m°ney, wogld
{ talk Ibm ut notmake no promises a Metro estimates it will receive as cal is expected to aDProve Cusma s Meirowe had gone ant there; made
. interested in 'gougInga ymuct as,$6&00(1D fromlthe:cances contractchan ges- 1 11 t ofraTl.av7s uit 7 arid suddenly
n next + 'settlement.'74 yen t in the lunlllcely ;l tird toMetro ,
uaem and I hoprz,4hey;re nggf' tter # stone thrs"year"and $1 m il lio ,
ested in gouging us i Burtonsaid Z Year But libel's not as :much as revent the councll tnedto+restore th found ourselves) losing : money, do
hope ws: can tzlca a look at the ;vsay4} #Mefro would have received if it had t .`rate protection ilaus$u , a reiiegoetro wath thisib greet
the bustness climate has cbanged Seattle a rate Seattle s rate could I itililks at sYtoo ]ate i + s l azb " etcompanY: out of; Chicago?; '
w 3 ` divp another $1;50 a ton of it bungs t w 36 A.
j ; Threw snore tantlfarlls , i in more garbage: ! S P:o holds on eompany ; ac§ed 'No way'' We took
The biggest change,ln the past five t Cusma gave; away the store say It s hard:to knowhon trot~sttook i9aka rThlnFSrhave
,4i{Tp1D .`'Chane,tc L
yearshs'.;the development Of three some'members of the Metro' Connell rton is about trym'!.f iiow
more compeUng?ti landfills When~,~ .Tlo I think.W, Ca r that our rate 1 ` of l +
Waste .Management=subinihed ;the~fipayers subsidrze;Seatfle waste'+ilvo I . .
only bid'forrMetroa garbage ;there ;adopt said"Kyistad thecouncrllor
were no 'other available JandAlY;$V npharge'o€waste disposal tssues;'T 4 r
at St r thinkr it as blatantly unfair and''I t
j and Portland s emitting landfill
Johns faced'forcedclosur^ for~'eiavi"thvdt~there ought to be some eqm' f
r ronmentalreasons- = ti ty~yi to r'x+ ' pa's
MettoQras out ofptionsanddesz Susan McLaint a Meru councillor I
pernte whenlftaasked forwbids ;Not asaid:Cusma,approved the change on
only dad•Waste Manzgementoffer toherrownafter a Metro committee ap
11
tuild alandf3]i the companybuiltit ,xgearEd on thsfverge of rejecting it
L an area Ideal forihsposal„east iheiMetro Council sum challeng f
i offheC reader'nt`in rcommainifv xiQCusrnaq,authoritytoactMiliout
thatwanfedw 1 ~4 rennet 7P The utdtis sill
t
I
i ~
' r7 E ` Washington County Haulers Association
PO Box 1622
4800 SW Griffith Drive Suite 260
Beaverton, Oregon 97075-1622
503-641-4337 FAX 503-641-5937
:s
pri.l. 18, 1995
1 G,a,ys,onorable Mayor of the City of Tigard
Dnt~ i Honorable Members of the City Council of Tigard ~
ubject: Solid Waste Programs in Tigard
t ¢
I~s members of the Washington County Haulers Association,
We, your solid waste haulers, appreciate the opportunity to k,
c jxpr.ess our concerns about the Solid Waste rate review
The citizens of Tigard have enjoyed continually improving
rograms, with high service levels. Based upon a first
,ry review, it seems important that we work together to preserve:
these programs in a way that fairly covers their costs.
We have made the investments and providcad the services ~
itequested by the City (to meet State and Metro mandates).
There is an understanding with the City that an annual
eview, based upon guidelines previously set, would be I
sed to evaluate the +effectivene:::s of the prc~gramand t:o
1 Fdjust the rates as needed. This policy understanding has
~een used successfully since 1987. '
:S
iIn order.to maintain a completa solid waste program for
3 Tigard's citizens, including recycling arid yard dabri.s,
,s we must meet the financial obligations of those programs.
i
Let's work together., using these guidelines, -to make the
Fhanges needed to preserve and improve our programs,
l
1 nother concern is the continued dependence on a commercial
ubsidy to maintain residential rates well below the actual
"t°' ~_ost of service. The costs of the coming commercial
recycling programs will add pressure to the commercial rate,
± „G faking the subsidy more difficult to maintain.
Since 1987, the haulers have contained costs successfully.
Rate increases have come from either new services or
increases in the Metro disposal fee. There has been no
Metro disposal fee increase since 1992. Each of Tigard's k
dew programs has been added to the rate at a conservative
1 estimate of its cost.
~ i
l
I I
I Associated Members Providing Solid Waste & Recycling Collection Service to:
the cities of Banks, Beaverton, Cornelius, Durham. Forest Grove.
Gaston. Hillsboro, King City. North Plains, Sherwood. Tigard,
Tualatin. Wilsonville, and Washington County
11
If the City should pass an increase on to the residents of this
1 city, I for one will consider purchasing a trays compactor and
request the smaller trash barrel. It may take an few years to
recoup the cast of the compactor and, nature will have more
difficulty decomposing my trash, but I do not intend to sit idly
by while the City and the franchise haulers work together to fiat
a perceived problem by just throwing more money at it. There
! comes a time when you just have to say not
E
1
Lester Fishkin
f
,
i
l t
j
C
i -
i_
i
-i
1 ~
1
1f
y
i
i
i I
{
E _
{ April 28, 1995
Gar L3t.~/"
Lester rishkin
12611 SW Bridgeview Court
Tigard, OR 9 223
(503) 524-4675
i
_i F"•?!'~
' Tigard City council BAY 0 11995 `i
City Mall
13 .25 S.W- ?all Blvd-
Tigard, F
Tigard, OR 97223 ---°-----._~.~..e
]dear Council Members:
i
I recently read where consideration is being given to grant a
rate hike for garbage pick up to the three franchised haulers t'
contracted with the City of Tigard. The basis of the hike is the
fact that the hauler's overall profit fell below an 8% rate of
return, which the City feels is acceptable. As I understand it, G.
r` the loss was due to lost revenue from recycling. And now, the '
City is considering a rate hike to benefit the haulers and i
penalize the homeowners.
I final this appalling, that the City will consider price
increases when a) the hauler has a responsibility to control
costs and find more efficient ways to provide service and b) the
city, I assume with input from the three companies, set the
initial rate to provide the 8% profit. In a day and age when the
average annual salary increase for the majority of working people
is no amore than 30. Asking for a 9 to lot increase to make up
for a less than it loss in revenue is outrageous.
I am asking the members of the City Council not to give in to the
franchise haulers desire to increase their rates. Although a
i $21,00 annual increase may not be a financial hardship to most
residents, it does indicate to all residents that when a company
j contracts with the City of Tigard to provide services at a j
specific price and as a result, cannot turn a desired profit, all
they need to do is come to the City and ask for more money.
Let's ask them to manage their businesses more efficiently!
i
i E
F
1
1
- April 18, 1995-
Carolyn De Frang
` 11650 S.W. Terrace Trails Dr.
Tigard, OR
i.
Dear Councilors,
This letter is to bring to your attention the discrepancy in
the relative amount paid for trash pick-up by someone who has
on-call service versus the usual weekly pick-up. E
The current charge for disposal of one 33 gallon can, on-call,
is $8.50. Someone who puts out a 33 gallon can 4-5 times a
month pays only $16.50.
3 Such rates penalize the family who recycles, composts, mulches,
and purchases food and other commodities in recyclable or more
environmentally friendly containers.
It is suggested that those who generate the trash pay accordingly
for its disposal relative to the amount generated. Sewer payments t
G in Tigard recently went to a fairer payment schedule wherein usage
! dictates the rate charged. Rates for trash pick-up should also
reflect usage, and if someone doesn't need yard debris pick-up
because they compost and mulch, they should not be required to l'
subsidize those that do.
Your attention to this as you review the current trash rates and
franchise arrangements is appreciated.
E
Sincerely,
Carolyn M. De Frang
i
i
i
SOLID WASTE RATE/SERVICE COMPARISON (in effect In April, 1995)
all rates include bin & yard deN Is recycling services (yard debris rates computed on service offered that is closest to Tgard's)
i
i
i
SERVICE TYPE BEAVERTON DURHAM GRESHAM HILLSBORO LAKE PORTLA14D SHERWOODY TIGARD TUALATIN WILSON. WASH. CLACK ~ MILV/AUKIE OREGON WEsTLINH AVERAGEOF f
i
OSWEGO VILLE CNTY' CfTfY.' i CITY BOTH PAGEI.
20 gallon - curb $14.50 $16.18 $15.95 $15.30 $17.00 $20.60 $1750 $14.25 $15.60 $16.60 $17.76 $15.50 $13.70 $14.25 $18A0 $15.17
iI
20 gallon - yard same same same same same $23.60 $21.00 same same same $f8.76 $171DO same same same $20.09
32 gallon - curb $16.50 $18.50 $18.05 WA $19.55 $23.60 $19.28 $16.50 WA $18.60 $19.15 $17.70 $17.25 $17.95 $20.90 $18.73 )
(
32 gallon - yard same same same same same $2660 $22.78 same same same $20.15 $18.20 ; same same sane $2216
35 gallon rc NIA $18.50 $19.05 $17.45 0 $25:30 $19.28 $16.50 $18.60 $18.60 WA $18.10 NIA IVA WA $17.05 ~t
-i II
Recycling only WA $4.5D bin WA WA ? $ 4.50 bin $ 5.60 bin $ 7.40 bin & WA $ 925 bin & $6.53 bin & $325 tan N/A NIA WA
only only only yard debris yard debris yard debris
i Yard debris FOW-60-RC EOW-60-RC W-32-C EOW-60-RC W-60-RC EOW-60-RC EOW-60-RC EOW-60-RC W-90-RC W-90-RC EOW-60-RC W-32-C V °.2-C W-32-C W-32-C. Milk jugs yes yes yes ?
yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes -
Scrap paper yes yes yes ?
no yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes -
Plastics #1-#7 no no 911195 ? no no 7/1195 ? no no 4195 4911/95 ? 911/95 ? 9/1195 " 911/95 ? 9/1/95 ? -
Rate of return
=N/AWA 7% v
WA 9.5% WA B%-12% adj. 6%-12% 6%-12% 10% N/A NIA WA '
policy codified
to 10% informal nformal informal
j
County Urban Service Rates (not rural service rates)
R.C. =oll cal t service rather than can service
EOW = every other week service
i W = weekly service
60 = 60 gall/,/, container
j 32 02 gallon container
rc = roil cart container (mechanical assisted dumping)
can = can container (manual dumping)
I ? Unknown
nw„aar -
I
'i
.
SOLID WASTE RATESERVICE COMPARISON (In effect in April, 1995)
Drop Box Rates
I
I
SERVICE TYPE BEAVERTON * DURHAM GRESHAM HILLSBORO LAKE PORTLAND SHERWOOD ` 71GAND ° TUALATIN WILSONVILLE MASH. CLACK. AVERAGE
r i OSWEGO CIM.
FJ yard drop box $ 93.94 $125.45 $ 76.66 $ 74.70 $ 87.95 $120.00 $ 99.40 $ 88.60 $ 6835 $ 74.00 $ 95.76 $ 80.65 $ 90,48 E
C:
30 yard drop box $130.12 $125.00 $ 98.96 $105.70 $111.35 $174.00 $119.80 $108.70 $ 89.95 $111.00 $ 132.05 $ 98.10 $117.15
40 yard drop box $159.41 NIA $110.93 $107.85 $123.35 WA NIA N!A $103.80 $128.00 $158.27 $11335 $125.62
' Cities that charge actual costs of disposal fees and franchise fees back to the customer above the cost of service listed above
Average cost for the four cities using this rate process is: 20 Vaal drop box = $100.67; 30 yard drOD box = $123.34
f
` Still need to co.A. Beaverton, Gresham and Clackamas County • Also would tike Into on 191wa+tle,Or_gpe on city b West Linn
1
~ t
i
i
1
f
I
I
I
SERVICE TYPE AVERAGE TIGARD'S TIGARDTIGARD TIGARD TIGARD HATE TIGARD
RATE IN CURRENT RATE UNDER ABATE UNDER RATE UNDER UNDER RATE UNDER
REGION RATE ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION
A E C D E
1 R - 20 GALLON $15.17 $14.25 $14.65 $15.65 no change $1435 $15.05
R - 32 GALLON $18.73 $1650 $16.95 $18.10 no change $16.60 $17.45
R - RECYCLING ONLY $ 7.73 $ 7.40 $ 7.60 $ 815 no change $ 7.50 $ 7.55 E
I
C - I YARD CONTAINER
LOOSE (IxlweeA:) unknown $ 74.10 $ 76.10 no change no change no change no change
C - I YARD COMPACTED
(Ixlweek) unknown $17734 $182.13 no change no change no change no change
i
DB - 20 YARD LOOSE' - I
REGULAR SCHEDULE $ 90.48 $ 88.80 $ 94.25 no change $110.15 $10925 $ 97.70
(Ix/wk)
DB - 20 YARD COMPACTED -
REGULAR SCHEDULE unknown $106.80 $113.35 no change $132.45 $131.40 $11750
(lx/wt)
R = Lesideneial service line
C= Commercial service line j.
DB = Drob box service line
-I OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
!
Proposal A - 2.7% increase to residential & commercial lines and a 6.1% increase to drop box rates
2. Proposal B - 9.6% increase to residential rates only
3. Proposal C - 24% increase to drop box rates, only '
4. Proposal D - 230/a increase to drop box rates and $.10/month/customer increase to residential rates t
5. Proposal E -10% Increase to drop box rates and a 5.6% increase to residential rates`
3 FISCAL NOTES i ,
Under all proposals a 10% rate of return is achieved for the haulers in the aggregate. The City would continue to receive a
3% franchise fee on the haulers revenue. The estimated revenue from franchise fees would increase about $5,000 per year I'
under the new rate assumptions (proposals A through Q. Proposals C & D would achieve Council's direction from the 4/25/95
Council meeting. It appears that Proposal A and E most closely achieve the Council direction, honoring the two existing
i council policies referred to under the information summary section of this document while keeping residential and drop box
I service rates close to the regionsl average.
1. Proposal A - would spread the increase among all rate payers, however, this change would slightly increase the
commercial subsidy of the residential rates. The residential rate on a 32 gallon can would increase $.45 from $16.50
- i to $16.95 per month. The commercial rate on a one yard container would increase $2.00 from $74.10 to $76.10 per i
month. The drop box rate for regularly scheduled service of a 20 yard non-compacted box would increase $5.45 from
1 $88.80 to $94.25. With drop box rates making up only 44% of the total drop box revenue (disposal costs are 56%
of the total revenue) a larger percentage increase in required in drop box to achieve the same 10% rate of reLurn
result.
2. Proposal B - would increase residential rates only and would somewhat decrease the commercial subsidy of
residential service rates. (Last year residential rate payers experienced a26% increase in rates when yard debris
and scrap paper recycling services were added to curbside). The residential rate on a 32 gallon can would increase
$1.60 from $16.50 to $18.10 per month. The commercial rate on a one yard container would stay at $74.10 per
' month. The drop box rate for regularly scheduled service of a 20 yard non-compacted box would also stay at the
current rate of $88.80.
3. Pro sal C - would increase drop box rates only and would have no affect on the commercial subsidy of the
residential service line. This proposal may raise drop box rates beyond an acceptable level when compared to the
I regional average. The residential rate on a 32 gallon can would stay at $16.50 per month. The commercial rate on
a one yard container would remain the same, at $74.10 per month. The drop box rate for regularly scheduled service
of a 20 yard non-compacted box would increase $21.35 from $88.80 to $110.15. `
4. Proposal 0 - would increase drop box rates and residential rates. This proposal would have no affect on the
commercial subsidy of the residential service line. This proposal may raise drop box rates beyond an acceptable level
when compared to the regional average. The residential rate on a 32 gallon can would increase $10 from $16.50 ;
to $16.60 per month. The commercial rate on a one yard container would be the same at $74.10 per month. The
drop box rate for regularly scheduled service of a 20 yard non-compacted box would increase $20.45 from $88.80
to $109.25.
5. Probosal E - would increase drop box rates and residential rates. "This proposal would slightly decrease the
commercial subsidy of the residential service line. This option allows the Council to correct the profitability of the drop
box service line while at the same time, lessening the impact on the residential customer over that of Proposal B.
The residential rate on a 32 gallon can would increase $.95 from $16.50 to $17.45 per month. The commercial rate
on a one yard container would stay the same at $74.10 per month. The drop box rate for regularly scheduled service
of a 20 yard non-compacted box would increase $8.90 from $88.80 to $97.70.
r
F
i
f
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO.95
A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL INCREASING GARBAGE RATES DUE TO A LOW AGGREGATE
RATE OF RETURN FOR THE TIGARD FRANCHISED HAULERS REPORTED IN THE 1994 ANNUAL FINANCIAL
REPORT. (Proposal A)
f
i
k
WHEREAS, the above entitled matter came before the Council at the meeting of May 16,1995; and '
' WHEREAS, TIC Section 11.04.0901 provides that adjustments to solid waste rates may be discussed at a public f
hearing and adopted by Council resolution; and
WHEREAS reviewing the recycling rams provided at curbside and responding to citizen request, the Tigard Ci
9 E~~ tY t
Council has determined that there is an adequate plastic recycling market in the area and has determined that #i
through #7 plastic bottles should be added to the residential recycling program; and
r
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has an existing policy that recognizes that the aggregate haulers' rate of return
should be between 8% and 12°/a annually; and
WHEREAS, the rate of return was at 7.60/6 for the 1994 annual report which invokes Council's rate of return policy '
to bring rates up to a 10% rate of return in the aggregate for haulers through the rate increase process.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: f
i
t
Section 1: The Tigard City Council hereby approves an increase in the current garbage rates to provide
a 10% rate of return on gross revenue which is in keeping with Council's rate setting policy
adopted in 1967. The rate adjustment, reflected in Exhibit W, adds a 2.7% increase to
residential and commercial rates and 6.1% increase to drop box rates. These rates will be
effective 7/1/95 throughout the City of i igard. E
Section 2: The Tigard City Council hereby approves the implementation of a #1 through #7 plastic bottle
recycling program at curbside for residential customers. There will be no rate adjustment
approved for this new program since the haulers are receiving an increase in rates to a 10%a
rate of return. This program will be effective throughout the City of Tigard on July 1, 1995.
r
PASSED: This day of .1995.
t
Mayor - City of Tigard
i
ATTEST:
~j
City Recorder - City of Tigard
r
~ krJvxr~lres9S
f
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF TIGARD
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATES - JULY 1, 1995
PROPOSAL A - 2.7% INCREASE TO RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LINES AND 6.1% INCREASE TO DROP BOX
RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES
E
Recycling only (reel bins & cart) $ 7.60 monthly F
(red bins only) $ 4.65 monthly t
(yard debris cart only) $ 3.00 monthly
Mini-canlcart (20 gal) without yard debris exemption $14.65 monthly
with yard debris exemption $12.60 monthly M
Cart (32 gal) without yard debris exemption $1695 monthly
with yard debris exemption $14.90 monthly
Cart (60 gal) without yard debris exemption $2822 monthly
Cart (90 gal) without yard debris exemption $3450 monthly
On-call service (mixed waste, red bin and yard debris recycling) $ 8.75 each call
j.
* See Tigard Solid Waste Administrative Rule #94-1 for yard debris exemption process
COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE (LOOSE) MONTHLY RATES t
Container Size One Two Three Four Five
CanlCart (32 gal) $13.45
Each additional 13.45
60 gallon cart $ 24.73 $ 46.78 $ 6857
i
Each additional
90 gallon cart 31.01 5891 85.88
Each additional
i .
One yard 76.10 144.69 211.24
Each additional
One and 114 9096 172.49 251.63 $ 329.44 $ 401.21
Each additional 84.49 160.67 23496 307.87 37553
One and 112 105.63 20652 301.07 389.79 477.80
Each additional 100.08 191.11 28258 36498 446.68
Two yards 139.87 270.60 393.83 509.77 624.18
Each additional 13155 250.06 35994 46438 567.80
Three yards 191.53 369.08 53524 690.83 85339 E
Each additional 18228 353.68 516.86 67850 83798
Four yards 243.07 468.19 691.85 901.13 1,102.42
Each additional 234.85 45997 67953 892.81 1,09123
Five yards 291.65 572.03 84527 1,111.04 1,359.87
Each additional 28631 55630 822.17 1,08239 1,344.47
Six yards 334.99 656.42 971.69 1,276.48 1,57758
Each additional 321.11 644.09 953.10 1,246.08 1,53855
Eight yards 424.94 831.7:7 1,228.00 1,61628 1,992.86
Each additional 416.45 81528 1,203.56 1,58352 1,951.78
-
i COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE (COMPACTED) MONTHLY RATES
F
Container Size One Two Three Four Five
One yard $182.13 $345.72 $ 504.45 $ 660.72 $ 804.68
j Two yards $309.05 599.83 875.60 1,136.79 1395.02
Three yards $426.87 826.01 1,202.48 1,557.29 1,926.71
~ i
DROP BOX SERVICE (LOOSE) EACH SERVICE CALL
i
f
Drop Box Size Regularly Scheduled Service Occasional and Special Service f
Up to twenty yard box Charge $ 94.25 Charge $10550
Demurrage 5.00 Demurrage 5.00
Disposal fee actual cost Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost
j Thirty yard box Charge $11535 Charge $127.15 f_
Demurrage 6.80 Demurrage 6.80
Disposal fee actual cost Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost
DROP BOX SERVICE (COMPACTED) EACH SERVICE CALL
Drop Box Size Regularly Scheduled Service
t.<.,., r
Finder 20 yards Charge $10825
i Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
i
20 yards Charge $11335
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
30 yards Charge $14925
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
40 yards Charge $17130
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
1 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE RATES
Service Rate
Extra mixed waste per can $ 3.65
Extra yard debris (manual up to 32 gal.) 2.00
Additional yard debris service (second 60 gal. cart) 290 j
Call backs/return for pickup of inaccessible can per service call 825
Extra distance per foot after first 100 feet (cans) .01
Extra distance per foot after first 5 feet (carts) .01
Special service fee per hour 65.00 I
Account reinstatement fee per occurrence 10.00 j
NSF check fee per occurrence 15.00
i ~dYT4W9s
-r '
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON r
RESOLUTION NO.95
3 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL INCREASING GARBAGE RATES DUE TO A LOW AGGREGATE
RATE OF RETURN FOR THE TIGARD FRANCHISED HAULERS REPORTED IN THE 1994 ANNUAL FINANCIAL
REPORT. (Proposal B)
WHEREAS, the above entitled matter came before the Council at the meeting of May 16, 1995; and
WHEREAS, TMC Section 11.04.0901 provides that adjustments to solid waste rates may be discussed at a public f
hearing and adopted by Council resolution; and f
i
WHEREAS, reviewing the recycling programs provided at curbside and responding to citizen request, the Tigard City
Council has determined that there is an adequate plastic recycling market in the area and has determined that #1
through #7 plastic bottles should be added to the residential recycling program; and
' WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has an existing policy that recognizes that the aggregate haulers' rate of return
should be between 8% and 12% annually; and
' WHEREAS, the rate of return was at 7.6% for the 1994 annual report which invokes Council's rate of return policy tl
to bring rates up to a 10% rate of return in the aggregate for haulers through the rate increase process.
B
-a NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: i
Section 1: The Tigard City Council hereby approves an increase in the current garbage rates to provide
- a 10% rate of return on gross revenue which is in keeping with Council's rate setting policy j
adopted in 1987. The rate adjustment, reflected in Exhibit "A", adds a 9.6% increase to
residential customer rates. These rates will be effective 711195 throughout the City of Tigard.
f,
Section 2; The Tigard City Council hereby approves the implementation of a #1 through #7 plastic bottle
recycling program at curbside for residential customers. There will be no rate adjustment e
approved for this new program since the haulers are receiving an increase in residential
rates already which is in keeping with Council's rate of return policy. This program will be
effective throughout the City of Tigard on July 1, 1995.
{
PASSED: This day of 1995.
i
i Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
EXHIBIT "A°
CITY OIL TIGARD
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATES -JULY I, 1995
PROPOSAL II - 9.6% INCREASE TO RESIDENTIAL ONLY
i RESIDENTIAL RATES
i
j Recycling only (red bins & cart) $ 8.15 monthly
(red bins only) $ 495 monthly
(yard debris cart only) $ 320 monthly
I Mini•canlcart (20 gal) without yard debris exemption $15.65 monthly
with yard debris exemption $13.45 monthly
Cart (32 gal) without yard debris exemption $18.10 monthly
with yard debris exemption $15-90 monthly
Cart (60 gal) without yard debris exemption $30.12 monthly
Cart (90 gal) without yard debris exemption $36.81 monthly f
On-call service (mixed waste, red bin and yard debris recycling) $ 935 each call
* See Tigard Solid Waste Administrative Rule #94-1 for yard debris exemption process
r.
-i r
COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE (LOOSE) MONTHLY RATES ;
E
a
Container Size One Two Three Four Five -
Can/Cart (32 gal) $13.10
i
Each additional 13.10
60 gallon cart $ 24.08 $ 45.75 $ 66.77
Each additional
90 gallon cart 30.19 57.36 83.62 j
Each additional
One yard 74.10 140.89 205.69
Each additional
One and 114 8857 16795 245.01 $ 320.78 $ 390.66
Each additional 8227 156.45 228.78 299.78 365.66
One and 112 102.85 201.09 293.15 37954 46524
Each additional 97.45 186.09 275.15 355.38 43494
Two yards 136.19 263.49 383.48 49637 607.77
Each additional 128.09 243.49 350.48 452.17 552.87
Three yards 186.49 35938 521.17 672.67 83095
Each additional 177.49 34438 50327 660.66 81595
i
Four yards 236.68 455.88 673.66 877.44 1,073.44
Each additional 228.68 447.88 661.66 86934 1,06254
Five yards 28398 55699 823.05 1,081.83 1324.12
Each additional 278.78 541.67 800.55 1,05393 1,309.12
Six yards 326.18 639.16 946.14 1,24292 1,536.10
Each additional 320.08 627.16. 928.04 1,21332 1,49810
Eight yards 413.77 809.85 1,195.72 1,573.79 1,940.47
Each additional 40550 793.85 1,17192 1541.89 1900.47
COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE (COMPACTED) MONTH Ly RATES F
r ' r
i Container Size One Tivo Three Four Five E
1
One yard $17734 $336.63 $ 491.19 $ 64335 $ 78352
Two i yards $30092 584.06 85258 1,106.90 1,35834
Three yards $415.65 804.29 1,170.87 1,516.35 1,876.06
DROP BOX SERVICE (LOOSE) EACH SERVICE CALL r
Drop Box SizeRegularly Scheduled Service Occasional and Special Service
Up to twenty yard box Charge $ 88.80 Charge $ 99.40
Demurrage 4.70 Demurrage 4.70
- Disposal fee actual cost Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost
Thirty yard box Charge $108.70 Charge $119.80
Demurrage 620 Demurrage 620
Disposal fee actual cost Disposal fee actual cost k`
Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost E
DROP BOX SERVICE (COMPACTED) EACH SERVICE CALL
Drop Box Size Regularly Scheduled Service
r
Under 20 yards Charge $102.00
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost `
20 yards Charge $106.80
j Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
30 yards Charge $140.65
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
40 yards Charge $161.45
t
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost f
C
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE RATES
-1
Service Rate F
Extra mixed waste per can $ 3.90
Extra yard debris (manual up to 32 gal.) 2.00
Additional yard debris service (second 110 gal. cart) 2.90
Call backslreturn for pickup of inaccessible can per service call 825
Extra distance per foot after first 100 feet (cans) .01
Extra distance per foot after first S feet (carts) 01
Special service fee per hour 65.00
Account reinstatement fee per occurrence 10.00
NSF check fee per occurrence 15.00
mduss
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
' A RESOLUTION OFTHE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL INCREASING GARBAGE RATES DUE TO A LOW AGGREGATE
RATE OF RETURN FOR THE TIGARD FRANCHISED HAULERS REPORTED IN THE 1994 ANNUAL FINANCIAL
REPORT. (Proposal C)
i ~
WHEREAS, the above entitled matter came before the Council at the meeting of May 16,1995; and
WHEREAS, TMC Section 11.04.490.E provides that adjustments to solid waste rates may be discussed at a public
hearing and adopted by Council resolution;'and
j WHEREAS, reviewing the recycling programs provided at curbside and responding to citizen request, the Tigard City F:
Council has determined that there is an adequate plastic recycling market in the area and has determined that #1
through #7 plastic bottles should be added to the residential recycling program; and
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has an existing policy that recognizes that the aggregate haulers' rate of return
j should be between 8% and 12% annually; and
WHEREAS, the rate of return was at 7.6% for the 1994 annual report which invokes Council's rate of return policy
to bring rates up to a 10% rate of return in the aggregate for haulers through the rate increase process.
a k
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: s
Section 1: The Tigard City Council hereby approves an increase in the current garbage rates to provide
i a 10% rate of return on gross revenue which is in keeping with Council's rate setting policy
adopted in 1987. The rate adjustment, reflected in Exhibit "A", adds a 24%® increase to drop
box rates. These rates will be effective 7/1/95 throughout the City of Tigard. f
Section 2: The Tigard City Council hereby approves the implementation of a #1 through #7 plastic bottle
recycling program at curbside for residential customers. There will be no rate adjustment
approved for this new program since the haulers are receiving an increase in rates to a 10°/n
j rate of return in other program lines. This program will be effective throughout the City of
Tigard on July 1, 1995.
i
PASSED: This day of 1995.
j
k
f
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
f
City Recorder - City of Tigard
f
!
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
1
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF TIGARD
SOLID {WASTE DISPOSAL RATES - JULY 1, 1995 ~
PROPOSAL C - 24% INCREASE TO DROP BOX ONLY
RESIDENTIAL RATES #
Recycling only (red bins & cart) $ 7.40 monthly
I (red bins only) $ 450 monthly f
J (yard debris cart only) $ 290 monthly
Mini-canlcart (20 gal) without yard debris exemption $14.25 monthly
with yard debris exemption $1225 monthly
Cart (32 gal) without yard debris exemption $1650 monthly
r
3 with yard debris exemption $1450 monthly
Cart (60 gal) without yard debris exemption $27.48 monthly
Cart (90 gal) without yard debris exemption $3359 monthly E
l On-call service (mixed waste, red bin and yard debris recycling) $ 850 each call
* See Tigard Solid Waste Administrative Rule #94-1 for yard debris exemption process
COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE (LOOSE) MONTHLY RATES
z
Container Size One Two Three Four Five
Can/Cart (32 gal) $13.10
Each additional 13.10
60 gallon cart $ 24.08 $ 45.75 $ 66.77 f
Each additional
i 90 gallon cart 30.19 5736 83.62
Each additional
One yard 74.10 140.89 205.69 i
Each additional
One and 114 8857 167.95 245.01 $ 320.78 $ 390.66
Each additional 8227 156.45 228.78 299.78 365.66
z:a
One and 112 102.85 201.09 293.15 37954 46524
Each additional 97.45 186.09 275.15 35538 43494
! Two yards 136.19 263.49 383.48 49637 607.77
Each additional 128.09 243.49 350.48 452.17 552.87
F
j Three yards 186.49 35938 521.17 672.67 830.95
a Each additional 177.49 34438 50327 660.66 81595
J
Four yards 236.68 455.88 673.66 877.44 1,073.44
j Each additional 228.68 447.88 661.66 86934 1,06254
i
Five yards 28398 55699 823.05 1,081.83 1,324.12
i Each additional 278.78 541.67 80055 1,05393 1,309.12
Six yards 32638 639.16 946.14 1,24292 1,536.10
Each additional 320.08 627,16 928.04 1,21332 1,49830
Eight yards 413.77 809.85 1,195.72 1,573.79 1940.47
Each additional 40550 793.85 1,17192 1X41.89 1900.47
COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE (COMPACTED) MONTHLY RATES
Container Size One Two Three Four Five
L
One yard $17734 $336.63 $ 491.19 $ u; 3 3 i $ 78352 : .
Two yards $30092 584.06 85258 1,106.90 1,35834
Three yards $415.65 804.29 1,170.87 1,51635 1,876.06
_j
DROP BOX SERVICE LOOSE) EACH SERVICE CALL
I;
a Drop Box Size Regularly Scheduled Service Occasional and Special Service f:
i
q Up to twenty yard box Charge $110.15 Charge $123.25
1 c;,-U-,ag6 5ns Demurrage 5.85
` Dispo sal fee actual cost Disposai fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost
i
Thirty yard box Charge $134.80 Charge $14855
Demurrage 7.70 Demurrage 7.70
Disposal fee actual cost Disposal fee actual cost
1 Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost i
i
f
i DROP BOIL SERVICE (C01tIP?CTSDD EACH SERVICE CALL
j Drop Box Size Regularly Scheduled Service
i Under 20 yards Charge $126.50 c
j Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost [
20 yards Charge $132.45
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost '
30 yards Charge $174.40
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
a
40 yards Charge $20020
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
i
MISCELL4NEOUS SERVICE RATES
i
Service Rate
Extra mixed waste per can $ 3S5
1 Extra yard debris (manual up to 32 gal.) 2.00
Additional yard debris service (second 60 gal. cart) 2.90
Call backslreturn for pickup of inaccessible can per service call 825
Extra distance per foot after first 100 feet (cans) .01
Extra distance per foot after first 5 feet (carts) .01
Special service fee per hour 65.00
Account reinstatement fee per occurrence 10.00
NSF check fee per occurrence 15.00
a
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO.95
3 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL INCREASING GARBAGE RATES DUE TO A LOW AGGREGATE
RATE OF RETURN FOR THE TIGARD FRANCHISED HAULERS REPORTED IN THE 1994 ANNUAL FINANCIAL
REPORT. (Proposal D)
i
F
WHEREAS, the above entitled matter came before the Council at the meeting of May 16, 1995; and
I
WHEREAS, TMC Section 11.04.090.E provides that adjustments to solid waste rates may be discussed at a public
i hearing and adopted by Council resolution; and
i
WHEREAS, reviewing the recycling programs provided at curbside and responding to citizen request, the Tigard City
Council has determined that there is an adequate plastic recycling market in the area and has determined that #1
F:
through #7 plastic bottles should be added to the residential recycling program; and
3
i WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has an existing policy that recognizes that the aggregate haulers' rate of return '
should be between 80/6 and 12% annually; and
WHEREAS, the rate of return was at 7.61% for tie 1994 annual report which invokes Council's rate of return policy
to bring rates up to a 10% rate of return in the aggregate for haulers through the rate increase process.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: V
s
Section 1: The Tigard City Council hereby approves an increase in the current garbage rates to provide
a 10% rate of return on gross revenue which is in keeping with Council's rate setting policy
adopted in 1987. The rate adjustment, reflected in Exhibit "A", adds a 23% increase to drop
box rates. These rates will be effective 7/1/95 throughout the City of Tigard.'
Section 2: The Tigard City Council hereby approves an increase in the current garbage rates to reflect
the implementation of a f#1 through #7 plastic bottle recycling program at curbside for
residential customers. The rate adjustment, reflected in Exhibit "A", adds $.10 to the monthly
residential rates to cover the cost of the new recycling program. This program will be
effective throughout the City of Tigard on July 1, 1995.
PASSED: This day of 1995.
i
i
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
j lmtswrat».SS
RESOLLITIONNO. 95-
i.
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF TIGARD F
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL PATES - JULY 1, 1995
{ PROPOSAL O - 23'31, INCREASE TO DROP BOX AND A $.10 INCREASE TO RESIDENTIAL FOR PLASTIC
MOTTLES (#I - #7) RECYCLED AT CURBSIDE
RESIDENTIAL RATES
Recycling only (red bins & cart) $ 780 monthly
i (red bins only) $ 4.60 monthly
(yard debris cart only) $ 2.90 monthly k
Mini-canlcart (20 gal) without yard debris exemption $1435 monthly
with yard debris exemption $1235 monthly _
Cart (32 gal) without yard debris exemption $16.60 monthly
with yard debris exemption $14.60 monthly
s Cart (60 gat) without yard debris exemption $2758 monthly
Cart (90 gal) without yard debris exemption $33.69 monthly
On-call service (mixed waste, red bin and yard debris recycling) $ 8.60 each call
6
* See Tigard Solid Waste Administrative Rule #94-1 for yard debris exemption process
j COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE (LOOSE) MONTHLY RATES i
i Container Size One Two Three Four Five
! CanlCart (32 gal) $ 13.10 `
Each additional 13.10
1
s 60 gallon cart $ 24.08 $ 45.7° $ 66.77
9 Each additional
90: gallon cart 30.19 5736 83.62
Each additional
? One yard 74.10 140.89 205.69
Each additional
One and 114 8857 167.95 245.01 $ 320.78 $ 390.66 E
Each additional 8227 156.45 228.78 299.78 365.66
One and 112 102.85 201.09 293.15 37954 46524
I Each additional 97.45 186.09 275.15 35538 43494
Two yards 136.19 263.49 383.48 49637 607.77
a Each additional 128.09 243.49 350.48 452.17 552.87 j
Three yards 186.49 35938 521.17 672.67 83095
Each additional 17749 34438 503.27 660.66 81595
Four yards 236.68 455.88 673.66 877.44 1,073.44
Each additional 228.68 447.88 661.66 86934 1,06254
Five yards 28398 556.99 823.05 1,081.83 1,324.12
Each additional 278.78 541.67 80055 1,05393 1,309.12
}
i
Six yards 326.18 639.16 946.14 1,24292 1,536.10 i
Each additional 320.08 627.16 928.04 1,21332 1,498.10
Eight yard;
413.77 809.85 1,195.72 1,573.79 1,940.47
Each additional 40550 793.85 1,171.92 1,541.89 1,900.47 i
COMMERCIAL C0l4tTAd1ltE€l SERVICE (CORiPACTED) MONTHLY RATES
L
Container Size One Two Three Four Five
One yard $17734 $336.63 $ 491.19 $ 64335 $ 78352
Two yards $309.05 584.06 85258 1,10690 1,35834
Three yards $415.65 80429 1,170.87 1,51635 1,876.06
SERVICE CALL
DROP BOX SElt4'!CE jLOi3SE) EACH
Drop Box Size Regularly Scheduled Service Occasional and Special Service
Up to twenty yard box Charge $10925 Charge $12230
Demurrage 5.80 Demurrage 5.80
_ Disposal fee actual cost Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost f
Thirty yard box Charge $133.70 Charge $14735
1 Demurrage 7.65 Demurrage 7.65
Disposal fee actual cost Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost
1 r.
DROP BOX SERVICE (C0AlPACT ED) EACH SERVICE CALL
a Drop Box Size Regularly Scheduled Service
Under 20 yards Charge $12550
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
20 yards Charge $131.40
-1 Disposal fee actual cos.
Franchise fee actual cost
30 yards Charge $173.40
Disposal fee actual cost
p Franchise fee actual cost
40 yards Charge $19858
i
Disposal fee actual cost
{ Franchise fee actual cost
i
MISCELLANE,0US SERVICE RATES
Service Rate
Extra mixed waste per can $ 3.65
Extra yard debris (manual up to 32 gal.) 2.00
Adddttonat yard debris service (second 60 gal. cart) 2.90
Call backslreturn for pickup of inaccessible can per service call 825 i
Extra distance per foot after first 100 feet (cans) .01
i Extra distance per foot after first 5 feet (carts) .01 '
{ Special service fee per hour 65.00
Account reinstatement fee per occurrence 10.00
1NSF check fee per occurrence 15.00
i
daaawrata9S
i
3
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO.95--.. F
~ l
A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL INCREASING GARBAGE RATES DUE TO A LOW AGGREGATE
RATE OF RETURN FOR THE TIGARD FRANCHISED HAULERS REPORTED IN THE 1994 ANNUAL FINANCIAL
x
REPORT. (Proposal E)
1
WHEREAS, the above entitled matter came before the Council at the meeting of May 16, 1995; and
' WHEREAS, TMC Section 11.04.090.E provides that adjustments to solid waste rates may be discussed at a public
hearing and adopted by Council resolution; and C
WHEREAS, reviewing the recycling programs provided at curbside and responding to citizen request, the Tigard City
Council has determined that there is an adequate plastic recycling market in the area and has determined that #1
through #7 plastic bottles should be added to the residential recycling program; and
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has an existing policy that recognizes that the aggregate haulers' rate of return
should be between 8% and 120%6 annually; and
"r
WHEREAS, the rate of return was at 7.6% for the 1994 annual report which invokes Council's rate of return policy E
to bring rates up to a 10% rate of return in the aggregate for haulers through the rate increase process. t
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: b
Section 1; The Tigard City Council hereby approves an increase in the current garbage rates to provide
a 10% rate of return on gross revenue which is in keeping with Council's rate setting policy
adopted in 1987. The rate adjustment, reflected in Exhibit "A", adds a 10% increase to drop
box rates and a 5.6% increase to residential rates. These rates will be effective 7/1/95
throughout the City of Tigard.
1
Section 2: The Tigard City Council hereby approves the implementation of a #1 through #7 plastic bottle
recycling program at curbside for residential customers. There will be no rate adjustment
approved for this new program since the haulers are receiving an increase in residential
rates already which is in keeping with Council's rate of return policy. This program will be
effective throughout the City of Tigard on July 1, 1995.
E.
PASSED: This day of 1995..
f
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
Mvs~r~~oa.~
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
a - EXHIBIT #A"
CITY OF TIGARD i
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATES - JULY 1, 1995
3 PROPOSAL E - 10% INCREASE TO DROP BOX AND A 1.6% INCREASE TO RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RATES
i
Recycling only (red bins c& cart) $ 7.85 monthly
1
(red bins only) $ 4.75 monthly
(yard debris cart only) $ 3.10 monthly
Mini-canlcart (20 gal) without yard debris exemption $15.05 monthly
with yard debris exemption $1295 monthly
Cart (32 gal) without yard debris exemption $17.45 monthly [
with yard debris exemption $1535 monVy
Cart (60 gal) without yard debris exemption $29.02 monthly
Cart (90 gal) without yard debris exemption $35.47 monthly
On-call service (mixed waste, red bin and yard debris recycling) $ 9.00 each call
I
j * See Tigard Solid Waste Administrative Rule #94-1 for yard debris exemption process
COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE (LOOSE) MONTHLY RATES
t
Container Size One Two Three Four Five
Can/Cart.(32 gal) $13.10
Each additional 13.10
60 gallon cart $ 24.08 $ 45.75 $ 66.77
Each additional
90 gallon cart 30.19 5736 83.62
Each additional t
One yard 74.10 140.89 205.69 l
Each additional
i.
One and 114 8857 16795 245.01 $ 320.78 $ 390.66 i
Each additional 8227 156.45 228.78 299.78 365.66
One and 112 102.85 201.09 293.15 37954 46524
Each additional 97.45 186.09 275.15 35538 434.94
Two yards 136.19 263.49 383.48 49637 607.77
Each additional 128.09 243.49 350.48 452.17 552.87 f
Three yards 186.49 35938 521.17 672.67 830.95
Each additional 177.49 34438 50327 660.66 81595
Jf
Four yards 236.68 455.88 673.66 877.44 1,073.44
Each additional 228.68 447.88 661.66 86934 1,06254 f
Five yards 28398 55699 823.05 1,081.83 1,324.12
Each additional 278.78 541.67 80055 1,053.93 1,309.12
Six yards 326.18 639.16 946.14 1,242.92 1,536.10
Each additional 320.08 627.16 928.04 1,21332 1,498.10
k
Eight yards 413.77 809.85 1,195.72 1,573.79 1,940.47
Each additional 406-50 793.85 1,17192 1541.89 1,9 0.47
COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE, (COMPACTED) AYONTBl Y RAP'L5'
container _Size _ One Two Three Four Five
One yard $17734 $336.63 $ 491.19 $ -543.35 $ 78352
Two yards $369.05 584.06 85258 1,105.90 1.35834
" Three yards $415.65 80429 1,170.87 1,51635 1,876.06
1 DROP BOX SERVICE LLOOSE) EACH SERVICE CALL
DMe Box Size Reeulard~_Scheduled _Service _ Occasdonal and SneCiat Service
- -
Up to twenty yard box Charge $ 97.70 Charge $10935
Demurrage 520 Demurrage 520
Disposal fee actual cost Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost
j Thirty yard box Charge $119.60 Charge $131.80
i Demurrage 6.85 Demurrage 6.85 -
i Disposal fee actual cost Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost
DROP BOX SERVICE (C(3l~SPACTED) EACH SFRVICE CALL
? Drot) Box Size Reeudariy Scheduled Scrvice
Under 20 yards Charge $11220
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
20 yards Charge $117-50
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
30 yards Charge $154.75
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost k
i
40 yards Charge $177.60
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE RATES
Service Rate
Extra mixed waste per can $ 3.75
Extra yard debris (manual up to 32 gal.) 2.00
Additional yard debris service (second 60 gal. cart) 2.90
Call backsdreturn for pickup of inaccessible can per service call 825
Extra distance per foot after first 100 feet (cans) .01
Extra distance per foot after first 5 feet (carts) .01
Special service fee per hour 65.00
Account reinstatement fee per occurrence 10.00
NSF check fee per occurrence 15.00
i
r N Washington County+ Haulers Association
PO Box 1622
Agenda item No.
i 4800 SW Griffith Drive Suite 260
Beaverton, Oregon 97075-1622
F. j f 503-641-4337 FAX 503-641-5937 Meeting of_
j May 12, 1995
Honorable Mayor of the City of Tigard "
3 , a
Members of the City Council i
Subject: Solid Waste Rate Adjustment
-j As your solid waste haulers, we respectfully request that
the following be considered in making solid waste rate
i adjustments: i`
Adjust the rate where the cost is, as much as possible.
j This suggests that a major part of the rate adjustment i.
D should go to the Residential service line, since that is
i where the largest cost increases have occurred. These
increases have been due mostly to mandated new programs, as
i customer participation has grown.
I Also, the Drop Box service line has historically been weak,
and an adjustment there is also appropriate.
We therefore support the Staff's proposed Alternative E, as
the most effective way to meet these objectives, and
- encourage you to direct implementation of Alternative E.
1
r Another aspect of the rate-setting process is education.
The more that citizens understand the basis of the rates,
1 the easier it is for them to accept the complete program.
It is therefore important that we continue to work
together to inform citizens about the benefits and true
costs of all elements of their programs. It is vital that
they understand what these programs do, as well as
understanding that the cost increases in "garbage" are
really helping to accomplish the recycling goals and
objectives which most citizens desire.
We appreciate your thoughtful consideration in this
decision.
G
1 Yours Truly,
- Mike Leichner Lar Schmidt Tom Miller
Pride Schmidt's Miller's
Disposal Sanitary Sanitary
:service Service i_.
i
i
Associated Members Providing Solid Waste & Recycling Collection Service to:
t
the cities of Banks, Beaverton, Cornelius, Durham. Forest Grove,
Gaston, Hillsboro. King City, North Plains, Shervoood. Tigard.
Tualatin, Wilsonville and Wasl)ington County
Washington County Haulers Association
PO Box 1622
Agenda Item No
4800 SAN Griffith Drive Suite 260
Beaverton, Oregon 97075-1622
503 64 1 -1337 FAX 503-641-5937 Meeting of 5I-ilDI 7P
j May 12, 1995
s Honorable Mayor of the City of Tigard
Members of the City Council
C:
Subject: Solid Waste Rate Adjustment
As your solid waste haulers, we respectfully request that
the following be considered in making solid waste rate
adjustments:
Adjust the rate where the cost is, as much as possible. E
j This suggests that a major part of the rate adjustment
1 should go to the Residential service line, since that is i
where the largest cost increases have occurred. These
increases have been due mostly to mandated new programs, as.
customer participation has grown.
Also, the Drop Box service line has historically been weak,
and an adjustment there is also appropriate.
j `
We therefore support the Staff's proposed Alternative E, as
the most effective way to meet these objectives, and
encourage you to direct implementation of Alternative E.
Another aspect of the rate-setting process is education.
The more that citizens understand the basis of the rates,
i
the easier it is for them to accept the complete program.
It is therefore important that we continue to work
together to inform citizens about the benefits and true
costs of all elements of their programs. It is vital that
they understand what these programs do, as well as
understanding that the cost increases in "garbage" are
really helping to accomplish the recycling goals and
objectives which most citizens desire.
' E
We appreciate your thoughtful consideration in this
decision.
Yours Truly,
Mike Leichner Lar Schmidt Tom Miller
Pride Schmidt's Miller's
Disposal Sanitary Sanitary.
Service Service
a
i
Associated Members Providing Solid Waste & Recycling Collection Service to:
f?arrs. 3eava ,cn Corierus. Durham. =ore t Gave.
} L tier. ua:crc KcgCu~ lrr Sne;,•!cod.-gar~.
runty
alatin.'~Glscn,..1e ar:d `rVasungtcn i
f .
i
Washington County Haulers Association
PO Box 1622 - r
4800 SW Griffith Drive Suite 260 Agenda item No _
e r ; e Beaverton. Oregon 97075-1622
503-641-4337 FAX 503.641-5937 Meeting of
May 12, 1995
= Honorable Mayor of the City of Tigard
I Members of the City Council
Subject: Solid Waste Rate Adjustment
As your solid waste haulers, we respectfully request that
the following be considered in making solid waste rate
adjustments:
Adjust the rate where the cost is, as much as possible.
This suggests that a major part of the rate adjustment
should go to the Residential service line, since that is
where the largest cost increases have occurred. These
increases have been due mostly to mandated new programs, as F ;
customer participation has grown.
Also, the Drop Box service line has historically been weak,
and an adjustment there is also appropriate.
We therefore support the Staff's proposed Alternative E, as
the most effective way to meet these objectives, and
` encourage you to direct implementation of Alternative E.
i
1 r Another aspect of the rate-setting process is education.
The more that citizens understand the basis of the rates,
the easier it is for them to accept the complete program.
It is therefore important that we continue to work
together to inform citizens about the benefits and true
costs of all elements of their programs. It is vital that
' they understand what these programs do, as well as r
understanding that the cost increases in "garbage" are
really helping to accomplish the recycling goals and
objectives which most citizens desire.
-
We appreciate your thoughtful consideration in this
decision.
1
1 Yours Truly,
i -
Mike Leichner LarSchmidt Tom Miller
Pride Schmidt's Miller's
Disposal Sanitary Sanitary
Service Service
Associated Members 'P'roviding Solid Waste & Recycling Collection 'service to:
LIE an:~5. Ear: ° J • !i r T. c si Grave.. -
d.,COrC. r<irg C&, la;ns S'1 i vrCd carci. g...
- aiatin. ,Vilscrvliie and Wa "-Jncmr, Cow •
f-
i
f
" Washington County Haulers Association
a ' r7 ✓ f' PO Box 1622 W"
4800 SW Griffith Drive Suite 260 Agenda ~t~~ " t Beaverton, Oregon 97075- i 622
503-64.1-4337 FAX 503-641-5937 Meeting of ~ + S l~ l_~t ~
i May 12, 1995
.1 Honorable Mayor of the City of Tigard
Members of the City Council E
r
i Subject: Solid Waste Rate Adjustment
As your solid waste haulers, we respectfully request that
{ the following be considered in making solid waste rate
adjustments:
-l Adjust the rate where the cost is, as much as possible.
`i This suggests that a major part of the rate adjustment
t
should go to the Residential service line, since that is
where the largest cost increases have occurred. These
increases have been due mostly to mandated new programs, as E
customer participation has grown. E
Also, the Drop Box service line has historically been weak,
and an adjustment there is also appropriate.
' We therefore support the Staff's proposed Alternative E, as
the most effective way to meet these objectives, and j
encourage you to direct implementation of Alternative E. E'
Another aspect of the rate-setting process is education.
The more that citizens understand the basis of the rates,
the easier it is for them to accept the complete program.
It is therefore important that we continue to work
together to inform citizens about the benefits and true
costs of all elements of their programs. It is vital that i.
they understand what these programs do, as well as
understanding that the cost increases in "garbage" are
really helping to accomplish the recycling goals and
objectives which most citizens desire.
4
We appreciate your thoughtful consideration in this
decision.
f
Yours Truly, {
L ull-lw~
Mike Leichner Lar Schmidt Tom Miller
Pride Schmidt's Miller's
Disposal Sanitary Sanitary
Service Service
Associates) Members Providing Solid Waste & Recycling Collection Service to:
is ark= Seaver , meWjS, UT-a:n. Forest Grove.
a o crc K r,g G't Va. !a r 5re ,roci. Tigard: i
. ' - ~uaiat~n..'vi~sonvslie 3rd u'J~.,i-+r_ton C~i ^.t,J ~
Washington County Maulers Association `
r PO Box 1622 ;
r a ` ' 4800 SW Griffith Drive Suite 260 Agenda Item No.
I t 4 Beaverton, Oregon 97075-1622
503-641-4337 FAX 503-641-5937 Meet ii1 {9E
E
May 12, 1995
Honorable Mayor of the City of Tigard
Members of the City Council
i
Subject: Solid Waste Rate Adjustment
As your solid waste haulers, we respectfully request that
the following be considered in malting solid waste rate
adjustments:
i
Adjust the rate where the cost is, as much as possible.
This suggests that a major part of the rate adjustment
i should go to the Residential service line, since that is
where the largest cost increases have occurred. These F
increases have been due mostly to mandated new programs, as
customer participation has grown.
Also, the Drop Box service line has historically been weak, r;
and an adjustment there is also appropriate.
we therefore support the Staff's proposed Alternative E, a43
the most effective way to meet these objectives, and
encourage you to direct implementation of Alternative E.
t
Another aspect of the rate-setting process is education.
The more that citizens understand the basis of the rates,
the easier it is for them to accept the complete program.
It is therefore important that we continue to work
i
together to inform citizens about the benefits and true
costs of all elements of their programs. It is vital that
{ they understand what these programs do, as well as
understanding that the cost increases in "garbage" are
really helping to accomplish the recycling goals and
objectives which mole citizens desire.
-i i
We appreciate your thoughtful consideration in this
. decision.
r
j
Yours Truly,
Mike Leichner eLart Schmidt Tom Miller
Pride Schmidt's Miller's
Disposal Sanitary Sanitary
Service Service
Associated Members Providing Solid Waste & Recycling Collection Service to:
_arius Se wei- 7~ ~t:^=r7.. _rest Gf^ve.
i on :I'sno' rC ng ` ns. ~'r,er~:n d -'gam.
T.i_iaen.`il8sor. de ard'f"Jasin ccr wr.y
` Washington County Haulers Association
PO Box 1622
j 4800 SW Griffith Drive Suite 260 Agenda Rom No• i
Beaverton. Oregon 97075-1622 c
;J 503-641-4337 FAX 503.641'-5937 1V1estingof
g May 12, 1995
' Honorable Mayor of tha City of Tigard
Members of the City Council
1
Subject: Solid Waste Rate Adjustment
a
As your solid waste haulers, we respectfully request that
the following be considered in making solid waste rate
` adjustments:
Adjust the rate where the cost is, as much as possible.
This suggests that a major part of the rate adjustment r
should go to the Residential service line, since that is
where the largest cost increases have occurred. These
increases have been due mostly to mandated new programs, as t
j
customer participation has grown.
Also, the Drop Sox service line has historically been weak,
and an adjustment there is also appropriate.
We therefore support the Staff's proposed Alternative E, as r'
the most effective way to meet these objectives, and k
encourage you to direct implementation of Alternative E.
_ F
f i. Another aspect of the sate-setting process is education.
The more that citizens understand the basis of the rates,-
1 the easier it is for them to accept the complete program.
It is therefore important that we continue -to work
together to inform citizens about the benefits and true
costs of all elements of their programs. It is vital that
' they understand what these programs do, as well as
understanding that the cost increases in "garbage" are
j really helping to accomplish the recycling goals and
objectives which most citizens desire.
l
We appreciate your thoughtful consideration in this
decision.
i
t
i
:4
Yours Truly,
G rCi~~ a
i
Mike Leichner Lar Schmidt Tom Miller
Pride Schmidt's Miller's
Disposal Sanitary Sanitary
Service Service
i
i-
Associated Members Providing Solid Waste Eli Recycling Collection Service 3o:
_ - `,~..,..as - artGc a~,.: , Cm~irJS. cGm. =crest G~ ova.
- _ cr , ro ~u,r; !crt. i . ~nen=,oca. "igard.
i iaiatin. `i s i9oCr,1i and Was,^,ing;cr ar
Washington County Haulers Association
PO Box 1622
4300 SW Griffith Drive Suite 260 Agenda !tart Nls•
} 3 Beaverton, Oregon 97075-1622
- 503-641-4337 PAX 503-641-5937 Meeting ni LP ~ ~ ~i J JY
May 12, 1995
Honorable Mayor of the City of Tigard
99 Members of the City Council
Subject: Solid Waste Rate Adjustment t
3 '
As your solid waste haulers, we respectfully request that
the following be considered in making solid waste rate
adjustments: j'
Adjust the rate where the cost is, as much as possible.
This suggests that a major part of the rate adjustment
should go to the Residential service line, since that is
where the largest cost increases have occurred. These
increases have been due mostly to mandated new programs,, as
s customer participation has grown.
Also, the Drop Box service line has historically been weak,
and an adjustment there is also appropriate..
i
L ';n
We therefore support the Staff's proposed Alternative E, as
the most effective way to meet these objectives, and
{ encourage you to direct implementation of Alternative E.
Another aspect of the rate-setting process is education.
The more that citizens understand the basis of the rates,
the easier it is for them to accept the complete program.
It is therefore important that we continue to work
together to inform citizens about the benefits and true
costs of all elements of their programs. It is vital that
they understand what these programs do, as well as
understanding that the cost increases in "garbage" are
really helping to accomplish the recycling goals and
objectives which most citizens desire.
{
We appreciate your thoughtful consideration in this
' decision.
Yours Truly,
Mike Leichner TalySchmidt Tom Miller
Pride Schmidt's Miller's
Disposal Sanitary Sanitary
Service Service
Associated iMembers Providing Solid Waste & Recycling Collection Service to:
3a ° rive re ;us. D_ rham.. cr~s: „ ve.
'"airs. Snetvv r_.o. tg
Tur:;aun. ':~/i;< ~ ±i? arr3'>^Jas^ma:cn Cvunsi
i
Washington County Haulers Association f
PO sox 1622
4800 SW Griffith Drive Suite 260 AgendaItem No•
Beaverton, Oregon 97075-1622
503-641 -4337 FAX 503-641 -5937 Meeting of 1 I LI,
May 12, 1995
Honorable Mayor of the City of Tigard
3 Members of the City Council
j p
Subject: Solid Waste Rate Adjustment
As your solid waste haulers, we respectfully request that
'i the following be considered in making solid waste rate
adjustments:
d
Adjust the rate where the cost is, as much as possible. t
This suggests that a major part of the rate adjustment
should go to the Residential service line, since that is
where the largest cost increases have occurred. These
increases have been due mostly to mandated new programs, as
customer participation has grown.
Also, the Drop Box service line has historically been weak,
and an adjustment there is also appropriate.
,r
We therefore support the Staff's proposed Alternative E, as
the most effective way to meet these objectives, and
encourage you to direct implementation of Alternative E.
Another aspect of the rate-setting process is education.
The more that citizens understand the basis of the rates,
the easier it is for them to accept the complete program. j,
It is therefore important that we continue to work
together to inform citizens about the benefits and true €
-.E costs of all elements of their programs. It is vital that
they understand what these programs do, as well as
understanding that the cost increases in "garbage" are
really helping to accomplish the recycling goals and
objectives which most citizens desire.
We appreciate your thoughtful consideration in this
decision.
1 f'
Yours Truly,
Mike Leichner Lar Schmidt Tom Miller
Pride Schmidt's Miller's '
' Disposal Sanitary Sanitary
Service Service
s
Associate-3 Members Providing Solid Waste $ Recycling Collection Service to:
c en 3ea e v r-s. Dur, am. F;rest Gv-cve.
~ ~r; .{:rq•f f Vcr' ~a^r.s. 5'rerr:rcr{, -.Hard.
L,asatir,; `Ali s-r ide and 'rtlaseinrror . ~Urity
p_
Washington County Haulers Association
PO Box 1622 s
4800 SW Griffith Drive Suite 260 Agenda ftgm No.
i t Beaverton, Oregon 97075-1622 p
_ I 503-641-4337 FAX 503-641-5937 Meeting of d I lP l et -
May 12, 1995
j Honorable Mayor of the City of Tigard
ii Members of the City Council
Subject: Solid Waste Rate Adjustment
As your solid waste haulers, we respectfully request that
a -the following be considered in making solid waste rate
adjustments:
Adjust the rate where the cost is, as much as possible.
' This suggests that a major part of the rate adjustment
should go to the Residential service line, since that is
where the largest cost increases have occurred. These
increases have been due mostly to mandated new programs, as
customer participation has grown.
Also, the Drop Sox service line has historically been weak,
,i and an adjustment there is also appropriate:..
We therefore support the Staff's proposed Alternative E, as
the most effective way to meet these objectives, and
r
encourage you to direct implementation of Alternative E.
Another aspect of the rate-setting process is education.
The more that citizens understand the basis of the rates,
the easier it is for them to accept the complete program.
It is therefore important that we continue to work
together to inform citizens about the benefits and true '
costs of all elements of their programs. It is vital that
a they understand what these programs~ do, as well as
i understanding that the cost increases in "garbage" are
really helping to accomplish the recycling goals and
objectives which most citizens desire.
We appreciate your thoughtful consideration in this
decision.
1
j
Yours Truly,
/o-
i Make Leichner LarSahmidt Tom Miller
Pride Schmidt's Miller's
Disposal Sanitary Sanitary
Service Service
r
Associated Menbers Providing Solid Waste & Recycling Collection Service toe
"e --;ties c' "enks. ?eavertcr. Cornehos. vLrr'ram. Forest Grove.
Gast n. r'~illsoorc. K!r.g Qty. Ncrtn F!atns. Shenvoc)d. Tigard.
T,;alatin. bvilscnvilie 3rd Washington CCUn r
r
Washington County Haulers Association
7 r PO Box 1622 ~j
i
4800 SW Griffith Drive Suite 260 Agenda
1 Beaverton, Oregon 97075-1622
503-641-4337 FAX 503.641.5937ptit l t9 ~S
May 12, 1995
Honorable Mayor of the City of Tigard
Members of the City Council
Subject: Solid Waste Rate Adjustment {
As your solid waste haulers, we respectfully request that
the following be considered in making solid waste rage,.
adjustments:
l
7
`i Adjust the rate where the cost is, as much as possible. ¢
This suggests that a major part of the rate adjustment
should go to the Residential service line, since that is
where the largest cost increases have occurred. These
increases have been due mostly to mandated new programs, as
customer participation has grown. r
Also, the Drop Box service line has historically been weak, t
and an adjustment there is also appropriate. E
We therefore support the Staff's proposed Alternative E, as r
the most effective way to meet these objectives, and
encourage you to direct implementation of Alternative E.
Another aspect of the rate-setting process is education.
- The more that citizens understand the basis of the rates,
i the easier it is for them to accept the complete program.
It is therefore important that we continue to work
together to inform citizens about the benefits and true
costs of all elements of their programs. It is vital that
`S they understand what these programs do, as well as
understanding that the cost increases in "garbage" are
really helping to accomplish the recycling goals and
objectives which most citizens desire.
1 f
We appreciate your thoughtful consideration in this
decision.
i.
i
Yours Truly, '
I
Mike Leichner Larld Schmidt Tom Miller
Pride Schmidt's Miller's
Disposal Sanitary Sanitary
Service Service
l
7
1 dissociated Members Providing Solid 'Taste & recycling Collection Service to:
`-!ie aies - Mks Beavertcn. Corne:vjs. Dur^am. Forest Grove.
aston. -;iisbor Kmg Cii-y. N(-:ih :=lairs. Sherwccd. Tigard.
7ua;atin. `PI:Isonvilte and Wasninn,:cn G.cumv
F
flu lq
MEMORANDUM ~j
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
-j
1
TO: Bill Monahan, City Administrator
FROM: Wayne Lowry, Finance Director
DATE: May 15, 1995 f
SUBJECT: Solid Waste Rate Option F
t
You had mentioned that Councilor Paul Hunt wanted to see an
alternative solid waste rate structure that involved the reduction
-,i of franchise fees. In response to Councilor Hunt's suggestion, we
have developed Option F.
This option includes the 10% increase in drop box rates proposed in
option E which produces an estimated $85,000 in increased revenues
.1 per year. In addition, this alternative proposes to reduce
franchise fees paid by the haulers to the City by $15,000 on an
q annual basis. The $15,000 approximates the 3% franchise fee on the
revenues from the yard debris increase last July and the current
n_ increase being considered to bring the haulers to the 10% rate of
return.
Taking the reduction of franchise fees into account reduces the
proposed increase in residential rates to 4.8%. This results in an
increase of $.80 per month for single can service.
To benefit from the reduction in franchise fees, we propose that
the haulers be allowed to pay the 3% franchise fee on 73% of
- residential revenues instead of the current 100%. We are also
proposing that this reduction in franchise fees be in effect for
one year beginning July 1, 1995 and only apply to residential
revenues. This would give the council the opportunity to review
the 1995 financial reports to determine whether this reduction will
be needed in the future.
It should be noted that any reductions in franchise fees directly
affects general fund revenue. This reduction of $15,000 for
-s 1995/96 will have a minor affect on general fund revenues.
4 ~
s
F
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO.95-____
a
A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL INCREASING GARBAGE MITES DUE TO A LOW AGGREGATE
RATE OF RETURN FOR THE TIGARD FRANCHISED HAULERS REPORTED IN THE 1994 ANNUAL FINANCIAL E
REPORT. (Proposal F)
WHEREAS, the above entitled matter came before the Council at the meeting of May 16, 1995; and
WHEREAS, TMC Section 11.04.090.E provides that adjustments to solid waste rates may be discussed at a public
hearing and adopted by Council resolution; and
WHEREAS, reviewing the recycling programs provided at curbside and responding to citizen request, the Tigard City
# Council has determined that there is an adequate plastic recycling market in the area and has determined that #1
through #7 plastic bottles should be added to the residential recycling program; and
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has an existing policy that recognizes that the aggregate haulers' rate of return
should be between 8% and 12% annually; and
WHEREAS, the rate of return was at 7.6% for the 1994 annual report which invokes Council's rate of return policy
1 to bring rates up to a 10% rate of return in the aggregate for haulers through the rate increase process.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
i - Section 1: The Tigard City Council hereby approves an increase in the current garbage rates to provide t
a 10% rate of return on gross revenue which is in keeping with Council's rate setting policy
adopted in 1987. The rate adjustment, reflected in Exhibit "A", adds a 10% increase to drop
box rates and a 4.8% increase to residential rates. The City of Tigard will then subsidize the
residential revenue by allowing the haulers to pay 3% franchise fees on 73% rather than
100% of residential revenues. These rates will be effective 7/1/95 throughout the City of
Tigard. The franchise fee reduction will be in effect for all residential revenue reported
7/1/95 through 6/30/96.
Section 2: The Tigard City Council hereby approves the implementation of a#1 through #7 plastic bottle
recycling program at curbside for residential customers. There will be no rate adjustment
approved for this new program since the haulers are receiving an increase in residential
rates already which is in keeping with Council's rate of return policy. This program will be
effective throughout the City of Tigard on July 1, 1995.
i
PASSED: This day of .1995.
t,
Mayor - City of Tigard
f ATTEST:
i City Recorder - City of Tigard
ImVSwr<,tres.95
-e~
EXHIBIT "A01
1 CITY OF TIGARD ,
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATES - JULY 1, 1995
J PROPOSAL F - 10% INCREASE TO DROP BOX AND A 4.8% INCREASE TO RESIDENTIAL
gll SIDENTIAL RATES
Recycling only (red bins & cart) $7.75 monthly P
(red bins only) $ 4.70 monthly
(yard debris cart only) $ 3.05 monthly
Mini-carlcart (20 gal) without yard debris exemption $14.95 monthly
with yard debris exemption $12.85 monthly
Cart (32 gal) without yard debris exemption $1730 monthly
with yard debris exemption $15.20 monthly
Cart (60 gal) without yard debris exemption $28.80 monthly F '
Cart (90 gal) without yard debris exemption $35.20 monthly
On-call service (mixed waste, red bin and yard debris recycling) $ 8.90 each call
See Tigard Solid Waste Administrative Rule #94-1 for yard debris e-remption process
COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE (LOOSE) MONTHLY RATES ,
I
Container Size One Two Three Four Five
• Can/Cart (32 gal) $ 13.10
Each additional 13.10
.1
60 gallon cart $ 24.08 $ 45.75 $ 66.77
_ Each additional
1 90 gallon cart 30.19 57.36 83.62
Each additional f
One yard 74.10 140.89 205.69 F
Each additional
One and 114 8857 167.95 245.01 $ 320.78 $ 390.66
i Each additional 8227 156.45 228.78 299.78 365.66
One and 112 102.85 201.09 293.15 37954 465.24
Each additional 97.45 186.09 275.15 35538 434.94
Two yards 136.19 263.49 383.48 49637 607.77
Each additional 128.09 243.49 350.48 452.17 552.87
i Three yards 186.49 359.38 521.17 672.67 83095 f
Each additional 177.49 34438 50327 660.66 815.95
Four yards 236.68 455.88 673.66 877.44 1,073.44
Each additional 228.68 447.88 661.66 86934 1,06254
Five yards 283.98 556.99 823.05 1,081.83 1,324.12
Each additional 278.78 541.67 80055 1,053.93 1,309.12
Six yards 326.18 639.16 946.14 1,242.92 1,536.10
Each additional 320.08 627.16 928.04 1,21332 1,498.10
Eight yards 413.77 809.85 1,195.72 1,573.79 1,940.47
Each additional 40550 793.85 1,171.92 1,541.89 1,900,47
3 -
COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE (COMPACTED) MONTHLY RATES
Container Size One Two Three Four Five
One yard $17734 $336.63 $ 491.19 $ 643.35 $ 78352
Two yards $309.05 584.06 852.58 1,106.90 1,358.34
Three yards $415.65 804.29 1,170.87 1,51635 1,876.06
1
DROP BOX SERVICE (LOOSE) EACH SERVICE CALL
j
i
Drop Box Size Regularly Scheduled Service Occasional and Special Service F
Up to twenty yard box Charge $ 97.70 Charge $109.35
Demurrage 5.20 Demurrage 520
i Disposal fee actual cost Disposal fee actual cost
' Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost
'-1
Thirty yard box Charge $119.60 Charge $131.80
Demurrage 6.85 Demurrage 6.85
11 Disposal fee actual cost Disposal fee actual cost
1 Franchise fee actual cost Franchise fee actual cost
DROP BOX SERVICE (COMPACTED) EACH SERVICE CALL
Drop Box Size Regularly Scheduled Service k
Under 20 yards Charge $112.20
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
i
20 yar is Charge $11750
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
30 yards Charge $154.75
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
_ 40 yards Charge $177.60
Disposal fee actual cost
Franchise fee actual cost
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE RATES
Y.
T Service Rate
Extra mixed waste per can $ 3.75
Extra yard debris (manual up to 32 gal.) 2.00
Additional yard debris service (second 60 gal. cart) 2.90
Call backsireturn for pickup of inaccessible can per service call 8.25
1 Extra distance per foot after first 100 feet (cans) .01
` Extra distance per foot after first 5 feet (carts) .01
Special service fee per hour 65.00
Account reinstatement fee per occurrence 10,00
NSF check fee per occurrence 15.00
i
t ✓rwrota95
s L
1 C~ f
AGENDA ITEM # AI DA) _ A 6 t,-AV
For Agenda of'/
~ t
F CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY t
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Additional retirement plan which allows Cho comol
h Measure 8.,
wit
PREPARED BY: Lorry Christian DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK i ,
ISSUE BEFORE THE~COUNCIL-'-
Should the Council approve International City Manager's Association-
Retirement Corporation (ICMA-RC) as a provider for an additional 401(a)
retirement Yplan _to-comply with Measure 8-__==_.
_ i--- _ - - STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Administrator to implement an additional 401(a) Retirement`
Plan with ICMA-RC to provide for mandatory employee contributions, pre-tax,
of 6%, required by the passage of Measure 8.
=INFORMATION SUMMARY
Measure 8, which was adopted by the voters in the November 8, 1994, general
election amends the Oregon Constitution to prohibit public employers from
paying their employees' 6% contributions to any retirement system or plan.
` The City's current ICMA Retirement Plans allow only for employer
contributions. A new IC14A Retirement Plan would be designed to allow for
joint employer-employee contribution.
The.additional 401(a) retirement plan will cover City employees who are newly
hired or who take new positions within the City after January 1, 1995, which
are non--represented. These non-represented employees are required to make t
mandatory contributions of 6s into a retirement plan.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
FISCAL NOTES
During calendar year 1995, City contributions to retirement plans will be
reduced from 14% to 8%: 1) for employees who are newly hired into non-
represented positions (after_ the successful completion of their 6 months'
probation), and 2) for employees who take new positions within the City which
are non-represented positions. It is estimated that there will be between 10
and 20 City employees affected.
f
is
~ I.
! f
f