City Council Packet - 11/22/1994
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
PUBLiC NOTICE. Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the
appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet Is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor
at the beginning of that agenda Item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes
or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or
the City Administrator.
Times noted are estimated: it Is recommended that persons interested in testifying be
present by 7:15 p.m. to sign In on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agmcfe items
amore be heard in order ader 7:~b
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should
be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting.
Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 6114-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices
for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services.
Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing
impairments; and
Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to
allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on
the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above.
639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deao.
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 22,1994 - PAGE 1
i WHOM=
w
i
k
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 22, 1994
sT AGENDA
® STUDY MEETING (6:30 P.M.)
Executive S Ion: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a), (d), (e), (f) & (h) to
discuss employment of public officers and employees, labor relations, real
property transactions, exempt public records and current and pending
litigation issues.
Council Discussion: Youth Activity Center
Agenda Review
1. BUSINESS -MEETING (7:30 P.M.)
1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications/Lialson Reports
1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please)
3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an
item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to:
3.1 Approve Council Minutes: October 11, 18, 25, and November 1, 1994
3.2 Approve Citizen Involvement Team Agreement
3.3 Authorize the Quitclaim of Gaarde Property, Lot 7, to Adjacent Property
Owners - Resolution No. 94-
3.4 Local Contract Review Board:
a. Award Construction Contract for 98th Avenue Storm Sewer Capital
Improvement Project to Miller and Sons Construction
b. Award Construction Contract for 100th Avenue Storm Sewer Capital
Improvement Project to Golden Valley Construction
C. Authorize the Request for Bids to Construct a Replacement Boat
Dock and Ramp at the Tualatin River Waterfront in Cook Park
COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 2
i'
a 4. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION - Z CA
94-0011 - WERT ANN TION
Location: 13970 S.W. Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 913D, Tax Lot. 1600). A
request to annex one parcel of approximately 0.46 acres into the City of Tigard and
to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zone from Washington County R-6 to City
of Tigard medium density residential R-7.
a. Open Public Hearing
b. Declarations or Challenges
C. Staff Report - Community Development Department
d. Public Testimony
Applicant
Proponents (Support the Annexation Request)
Opponents (Oppose the Annexation Request)
Rebuttal
• Staff Recommendation
• Council Questions
• Close Public Gearing
• Council Comments & Consideration: Ordinance No. 94
5. (FILL REPORT - HOMELESS TASK FORCE
• Homeless Task Force Representative Jack Schwab
8. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM UPDATE (Oral Report)
• Community Relations Coordinator
7. REGION 2040 - UPDATE. TO COUNCIL AND COUNCIL DISCUSSION
• Senior Planner Landsman
8. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PROPOSED BUILDING ROOM USE POLICY
• Finance Department Staff
8.1 Policies and Procedures for Reserving City of Tigard Meeting Rooms
(Resolution No. 94-_)
8.2 Update Tigard Senior Center Room Use Policy and Rental Procedures
(Resolution No. 94---)
9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session
under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a), (d), (e), (f) & (h) to discuss
employment of public officers and employees, labor relations, real property
transactions, exempt public records and current and pending litigation issues.
11. ADJOURNMENT
=112294
COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 3
Council Agenda Item 3•
TIGARD C„ITY COUNCIL
MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994
• Meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m. by Mayor Schwartz.
1. ROLL CALL
Council Present: Mayor John Schwartz; Councilors Wendi Conover Hawley, Paul
Hunt, Bob Rohlf, and Ken Scheckla. Staff Present: Bill Monahan, City
Administrator; Ron Goodpaster, Police Chief; Carol Landsman, Senior Planner;
Wayne Lowry, Finance Director; Liz Newton, Community Involvement Coordinator;
Jim Coleman, Legal Counsel; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; and Randy
Wooley, City Engineer.
STUDY SESSION
Council Discussion - Youth Activity Center
• Council heard information from Jack Schwab, resident of the City of 'Tigard, who
advised that about eight or nine months ago there was much publicity about a
problem with gangs in the community. Through brainstorming sessions with
several people, it became apparent that there were two groups of kids who were
,underserved: Latchkey kids and older kids (driver's license-age).
The YMCA has a program for middle schools which tries to get the kids to stay at
school and participate in sports activities and hobbles. There is a need to get kids
more interested in outside activities without it being the "uncool" thing. Of interest
is to find a place in the community for a teen center a place where kids can go
and have fun in a safe environment.
There is nothing like this in the City of Tigard, and a task force has been formed
that would like to put a program together. The task force is attempting to involve
the bids in putting together this program. A survey will be attempted at the high
school and middle school, noting that the program cannot be created just by
adults. If the kids do not have a direct hand in developing the program, they will
not be interested in it. It is anticipated that the survey will be done after the
Christmas break and all kids will be asked what their preferences would be for a
facility. Mr. Schwab advised that right now it is "pretty much a grassroots effort."
Criteria for the teen center includes the fact that the facility should be centrally
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 1
located as well as located where noise and traffic would not bother people. The
facility could be used for other purposes at other times.
It was noted the Canterbury property "water building" might be a possibility.
However, it was noted there may be problems because of the adjacent residential
neighborhood. Mr. Schwab said he would like to see the City involved in the
process, noting that there has been informal involvement with participation from the
Chief of Police and the Young Adult Librarian. Mayor Schwartz asked if the
building, at Canterbury was large enough to play basketball. Mr. Schwab noted
there was a paved area for a hoop, and that they were not looking for an indoor
basketball court. Some of the items they have heard were successful at other
centers is a big screen TV, a VCR, stereo system, and a room where they can play
air hockey, ping pong and arcade games. In addition, they would be looking at
having food and a microwave. He advised it would be a chaperoned facility.
Councilor Hunt asked about those who would participate from the middle school
and high school. He wondered if drop-out teenagers would be allowed to attend,
or if they would have to be in school. Mr. Schwab advised the task force was
grappling with that question. They started out by looking at alternatives for kids
' who might be "at risk." A lot of the kids involved so far in looking at this issue are
not at risk; they are the leaders in the school.
Mayor Schwartz asked about transportation from middle school. Mr. Schwab
advised he believed the facility was there and if they market it, the kids will come
if it is made interesting and attractive enough.
it was noted there may be some problems where high school kids and middle
school kids would not want to be there at the same time. It was also noted that
the Canterbury property was not owned just by the City of Tigard, but was the
property of those jurisdictions involved with the intergovernmental water agency.
City Administrator Monahan advised it may be necessary to purchase this property
from the water agency or to get approval from them.
In response to a question from Mayor Schwartz regarding how much financing
would be necessary, Mr. Schwab said he had no idea. He mentioned that the
proceeds of the saps of the Main Street building may be a possibility to help fund
it. Financing through the community foundation, an endowment program, or how
it would be built, equipped and operated would still need to be worked through.
Funding was discussed among Council. Mayor Schwartz advised he thought Mr.
Schwab had heard from most of the City Council that they think this is a good idea
and recommend Mr. Schwab's group keep pursuing it. He suggested they
complete the survey, develop a preliminary program, determine whether or not
there is any building space available, and come hack to Council when they have
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 2
z
111F,'' ISM; 11111 111 111,13 1I I'M
':3:
--111 REEMIM
Nis=
a "concrete: plan. Councilor Hawley questioned whether the City could be of
some help to accomplish the survey. She noted some department help had
already been given.
Councilor Scheckla requested earlier hours for the middle school students and that
curfews be kept in mind. He also noted there may be a need for a shuttle bus to
get the students to the center, and the need for volunteer time. Mayor Schwartz
noted the Canterbury building in the residential area would need a conditional use
permit, and he suggested the task force survey the neighbors to determine if they
would be receptive.
Mr. Schwab advised he was wide open to ideas, including a public-private
partnership, and was encouraged the City had an open mind to explore options.
He said he did not envision the City would be the sole source of funding.
Councilor Hunt said he felt this would be an extension of the DARE program and
the SROs. He noted that if a decent-sized building could be obtained, there may
be a need to consider having an employee to work at the center. He advised he
was not sure that a volunteer and/or service organization could handle the staffing
entirely.
Mr. Schwab also-noted there may be some dollars available from the Crime Bill.
Councilor Scheckla noted concerns with past attempts for getting a teen center
` going, rioting an attempt in the Portland area by Melvin Louie. He advised Mr.
Louie might give valuable input on both the good and bad of such a denture.
A student present at the meeting noted he had shared tha teen center idea with
his leadership class. He received positive comments only. Another student
present noted that the facility would be drug-free, but questioned whether a certain
section of the property would allow an area for smokers. Discussion followed on
this idea, with consensus of Council noting that if the City would be involved, no
smoking would be allowed. Mayor Schwartz noted that smoking by minors is
against the law, and would pose legal problems for the City.
Mayor Schwartz concluded the discussion by reiterating that there appears to be
a lot of support from the Council for this idea.
Council meeting recessed at 7:06 p.m.
The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 7:06 p.m. under the provisions of
ORS 192.660 (1) (a), (d), (e), (f) & (h) to discuss employment of public officers and
employees, labor relations, real property transactions, exempt public records and current
and pending litigation issues.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994• - PAGE 3
k ~1
j.
Executive Session recessed at 7:35 p.m.
BLISIIIESS MEETING
• Mayor Schwartz presented to Janice Deardorff, former Human Resources Director,
_ a gift from the City Council. Council acknowledged Ms. Deardorff's outstanding
performance sAs an employes of the City of Tigard.
Mayor Schwartz proclaimed December, 1994 as National Drug and Drunk Driving
Prevention Month in Tigard, Oregon.
Council Communications - Councilor Hawley noted a correction to the October 11,
1994 minutes; Page 5, top part of the page, Section D, should read "Motion by
Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to approve the Arts Policy and
criteria for eligibility to receive funds."
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA:
Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, Icing City, Oregon, questioned
Council minutes of October 11, 1994 with regard to the review of Icing City's
inquiry as to whether Tigard had any interest in pursuing a merger with the City of
Wng City. He noted the majority of land in King City was owned by the IUng City
Civic Association, and noted concerns with this issue. Mayor Schwartz advised
the Council was responding to a letter from the City Administrator of Icing City. He
noted Council had a lengthy discussion on this issue and said he felt the minutes
were quite clear on Tiigard's position. The City of Tigard is not looking to annex
Icing City to the City of Tigard, nor did the Tigard City Council bring this issue up.
Any future discussion would have to be initiated by a formal request from the Icing
City Council. Mayor Schwartz advised the City of Tigard has no interest in pursuing
annexation at this time.
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
3.1 Approve Council Minutes: October 11, 18, 25, and November 1, 1994
3.2 Approve Citizen Involvement Team Agreement
3.3 Authorize the Quitclaim of Gaarde Property, Lot 7, to Adjacent Property
Owners - Resolution No. 94-51.
3.4 Local Contract Review Board:
a. Award Construction Contract for 98th Avenue Storm Sewer Capital
Improvement Project to Miller and Sons Construction
b. Award Construction Contract for 100th Avenue Storm Sewer Capital
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 4
w
ill §11~121Z
MEMO ;I,
Improvement Project to Golden Valley Construction
c. Authorize the Request for Bids to Construct a Replacement Boat
Dock and Ramp at the Tualatin River Waterfront in Cook Park
.W
Item 3.2 was pulled until after the Citizen Involvement Team presentation by
Community Involvement Coordinator Liz Newton. (Agenda Item No. 6)
Councilor Scheckla asked for clarification on Item 3.4(c). City Administrator
Monahan advised the dock was replaced seven or eight years ago and that some
deterioration has taken place. In addition to problems of aging, the dock Is not In
compliance with ADA requirements. Funding has been received from the State
Marine Board to pay for the improvements. If bids should exceed the amount of
funding, there is a possibility that dollars from the bond levy for park projects could
be used. Mayor Schwartz advised the dock should last longer than eight years.
City Engineer Wooley responded to questions from Councilor Hawley regarding
Consent Agenda Item No. 3.4(b). She questioned the disparity between the
estimate at $42,000 and the bid at $29,000. City Engirill Wooley explained the
method in which bid prices are averaged over the years and how the =~r~gine~r
arrives at ant 'mate. He noted they did get very good bids on this project ;-d
said he feels comf -table that the bid was adequate a, id accur4 "e_
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Roll to approve thr, Consent
Agenda, with the removal of Item 3.2. (Mayor Schwartz and Councilors Hawley,
Hunt, Hunt, Rohlf, and Scheckia voted "yes.")
Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
4. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION - 7-CA 94-
0011 - WERT ANNEXATION Location: 13970 S.W. Bull Mountain Road (WCTM
2S1 9BD, Tax Lot 1500). A request to annex one parcel of approximately 0.46
acres into the City of Tigard and to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zone
from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard medium density residential R-7.
a. Public Hearing was opened.
b. Declarations or Challenges - No Council member reported any ex parte
contact or information gained outside the hearing, including any site visits.
All Council members indicated they familiarized themselves with the
application.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22,'1994 - PAGE 5
r
Y ..u bra
y
There were no challenges from the audience pertaining to Council's
jurisdiction to hear this matter; nor was there a challenge on the
participation of any member of the Council.
C. Staff Report
Senior Planner Landsman introduced Associate Planner Ray Valone, who
summarized the staff report. (Staff report is on file with the Council packet).
Mr. Valone answered some clarifying questions posed by Council with
regard to the map and maintenance of Bull Mountain Road.
d. Public Testimony
Mayor Schwartz read the following:
Do any members of Council wish to report any ex parte contact or
information gained outside the hearing, including any site visits?
Have all members familiarized themselves with the application?
Are there any challenges from the audience pertaining to the Council's
jurisdiction to hear this matter or is there a challenge on the participation of
any member of the Council?
Mr. Jack Polaris, 16000 Queen Victoria Place, King City, signed in as an
"opponent." Mr. Polans referred to Exhibit "B" Item No. 7, and wanted to
know if this was considered "island hopping." Mayor Schwartz noted that
islands are created when the City completely encompasses the piece of
property. Councilor Hawley noted this was an owner-initiated annexation.
Mr. Polaris questioned the change of zoning from R-6 to R-7, and noted
concerns with increasing traffic. Mayor Schwartz explained that the purpose
of the zone change was to assign zoning to the property which was as
close as possible to what the County had and what the City of Tigard's
zoning designations were. Mr. Valone also noted the R-6 and R-7 minimum
lot size were the same.
In response to further questions by Mr. Polaris, Mr. Valone advised the
Police Department looked at whether there would be problems of
enforcement. Councilor Hawley noted that with reference to some of Mr.
Polaris' concerns, Council was not considering any issues of subdivision at
this time. In response to a question from Mr. Polans, Mr. Valone advised
that no written response was received from the West CIT; they were notified
CITY COUNCIL MI=L=TING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 6
of the annexation. City Administrator Monahan noted the CIT has a choice
on whether or not to give written comments.
After some discussion, Legal Counsel Coleman advised Council that the
back-and-forth discussion during testimony on different points was not
required. It was up to Council to determine whether the annexation should
be forwarded to the Boundary Commission, with a recommendation for
approval.
Mr. Polaris said he was against the annexation.
Jeanne Bradley, 14500 SW 139th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon, testified. She
noted she owned property below Lot 2 as shown on the map. She said
she was not aware that people only within 250 feet needed to be notified.
She also read a letter from Jay Ronald and Cecilia 1. Thompson dated
November 22, 1994. The Thompsons live next door to the applicant
property at 14555 SIN 139th Avenue. The Thompsons protested the
change of zoning of R-5 to R-7, citing concerns with increased traffic (a
copy of the letter is on file with the Council meeting packet material).
Ms. Bradley questioned whether all of Mountaingate was in the City of
Tigard. She noted she and her neighbors were in unincorporated
Washington County. She advised that If there is an accident on Bull
Mountain Road, Washington County responds. Ms. Bradley advised in the
past sewer construction occurred where the owner of Lot S had to bear the
costs. The applicant did have an option of hooking up to the sewer, and
she described that situation. She noted the change in higher density would
create a dangerous traffic situation at the corner of Hillshire and Bull
Mountain Road. The increased density would change the entire character
of the neighborhood.
Mayor Schwartz advised that the City is required to change the zoning to
the closest zoning which matches what the County has. He also noted the
lot sizes, 5,000 square feet, were the same minimum lot sizes for both
zoning designations. In response to a question from Ms. Bradley, it was
explained how sewer hookups and non-remonstrance agreements work.
In response to concerns with Police service on the road, Mayor Schwartz
advised there was agreement between Tigard and Washington County that
the closest officer would respond to an emergency. Ms. Bradley reiterated
her concerns in the changes in livability with the higher density. She
advised that increased density is not meeting the needs of the people who
live there. She cited the safety concerns with the increase of traffic. She
noted the road was continually more congested.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 7
F
G. Staff Recommendation
Associate Planner Valone advised the application meets the criteria for
annexation and recommended adoption. There was discussion on the
number of units which would be allowed on the property, once developed
at full capacity. Mr. Valone explained the sewer service connections and
topography constraints. He also noted the property would have developed
at the same density, whether in the County or not.
f. Public Hearing was closed
g. Council Consideration
Councilor Scheckla advised the proposed annexation request would only
be beneficial to one lot, and he would not support the request.
Councilor Hawley referred to policy based on former action. She noted this
was an owner-initiated annexation. She said she could not discern any
legal challenges which were askew of planned policies. She noted there
appears to be some boundary irregularity. In response to density and
livability issues, she advised this did not represent a zone change in reality,
because there would be no more lots that would be able to built on,
whether or not the zone was R-6 or R-7. She noted she did not think this
would represent a traffic problem. She advised the CIT's did not respond,
even though they were notified. She requested the Thompsons be notified
that no density has been changed on the property. She advised she is in
favor of annexation.
Councilor Rohif noted he was not in favor of the proposal. He advised that
adding the extra lot and changing the boundaries added confusion. He
noted his concerns with the problems on Bull Mountain Road. He advised
it appeared that the owner had another option for sewer hook-up.
Councilor Hawley asked for clarification on whether or not this property had
an option for a sewer connection in another area. Mr. Valone described a
couple of options for sewer connection. He noted that one of the options
would require permission for access and another option might make it
necessary to have a pump station.
Councilor Hunt advised he could see no reason why the City would not
annex this property. He noted the property was within the UGB and there
was going to be no change in density. He advised he supported the
recommendation of the City staff.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 8
igill!
';Yi~ t JIiL"
Mayor Schwartz advised he believed the property conformed to the policies
for annexation to the City. He noted he did not think there would be any
adverse affect on the neighborhood, whether this property was served by
the C' or the County. He noted the property would produce the same
amount of traffic whether or not it was in the City or County. He referred
to the Urban Growth Boundary and that it is planned that properties within
the UG13 would eventually come into the City of Tigard. He did not see why
the City would want to discourage a property owner from annexing to the
City of Tigard who wanted to annex. He advised he supported the
annexation.
h. Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to approve
Resolution No. 94-52.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-52 - A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION TO
THE CI `Y OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT
"A" AND OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED (ZCA 94-0011)
Motion was approved by a majority vote of Council present. (Mayor
Schwartz and Councilors Hawley and Hunt voted "yes;" Councilors Rohif
and Scheckla voted "no.")
Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to adopt
Ordinance No. 94-25
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE
A ZONE CHANGE (ZCA 94-011, WERT) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Motion was approved by a majority vote of Council present. (Mayor
Schwartz and Councilors Hawley and Hunt voted "yes;" Councilors Rohif
and Scheckla voted "no.")
5. Final Report - Homeless Task Force
Mr. Jack Schwab, member of the Homeless Task Force, summarized the final
report to the Mayor and Council for the City of Tigard and the greater Tigard
community. (Copy of the report is on file with Council packet material). The City
Council created a task force in August, 1994 to study issues of homelessness in
the community. For the past several months the number of homeless people in
the City appears to have steadily increased. Council also had noted the activities
of certain homeless people had drawn attention to the plight of the homeless, and
led local merchants and other concerned citizens to ask that appropriate steps. be
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 9
r fit,
.L
ISBN 1,1151
taken to address the growing problem. Mr. Schwab identified the members of the
task force; members are listed in the task force report. Recommendations to the
City Council included the following: (For more detailed information, see task force
report on file with the Council packet material).
A. City of Tigard should immediately adopt a severe weather policy to help
provide such shelter on an emergency basis.
B. City of Tigard should immediately facilitate an effort to educate the public
about the problem of homelessness and what can be done as a community
to assist the homeless.
C. City of Tigard should immediately facilitate the formation of an action
oriented task force in Eastern Washington County to site and equip an
additional permanent homeless shelter and provide self-sufficiency
programs for the people sheltered there.
D. Eastern Washington County task force should facilitate a County-wide effort
to establish a Washington County detoxification center and achieve
significant increases in transitional and affordable housing options.
Sergeant Chuck Martin of the Tigard Police Department advised that from a
community policing perspective, this is a good effort. If issues are not dealt with,
the same problems would have to be dealt with over and over again. He noted
it was frustrating not to be able to find shelter for people, and that emergency
provisions would help save lives. He also noted the cost effectiveness of dealing
with the issues at detox facilities and in the long range, assisting families with
children so that we will not see the same problems continue with future
generations.
Councilor Hunt praised the Homeless Task Force for their work, noting the hours
that had been donated for this effort. He especially noted that Jack Schwab had
done a wonderful job in leading the group. He advised that Sergeant Martin was
a very good representative to have on the task force, as he saw a different
perspective on the situation. Councilor Hunt recommended that Council adopt the
report and act on it.
Mayor Schwartz asked some questions about the possibility of using the Senior
Center as an emergency shelter, and questioned whether 50 beds would be
enough. He noted the problem was County-wide, and questioned whether the
homeless of Tigard received.top priority.
Mr. Schwab advised that service would be provided on a first-come, first-served
basis. He said it was hard to tell where the homeless people actually come from,
CITY COUNCIL. MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 9994 - PAGE 10
4
as they generally have no address and no work history to check. He noted the
majority of homeless in Washington County originate here.
Kim Brown of the Interfaith Outreach Services advised that Multnomah County has
been expected In the past to deal with the overflow from Washington County.
Multnomah County does not have space. She noted the entire system is 'locked
up.
Discussion followed on how the people would be processed, how they would be
accommodated, and how the program would be administered.
Mayor Schwartz turned the discussion to public education and noted his support
for such an effort. Different avenues for getting this public education implemented
included public educational television, visiting with the CITs, and information
published in the Cityscape. There was additional discussion on the emergency
shelter and the time of operation. There was also discussion on the "Fish"
program and the fact that they are not doing food boxes at this time.
Kim Brown noted the severe weather shelter is different than some of the other
shelters in that the facility would be available to "just keep people alive" during
inclement weather.
After the end of discussion concerning the emergency shelter and what it would
offer, Mayor Schwartz noted that City should pursue, as co-applicant, securing the
conditional use permit for the Senior Center facility. He noted the Tigard Water
Building could be considered on an interim basis for use as an emergency shelter
if permission is obtained from the jurisdictions of the Intergovernmental Water
Agency.
There was discussion on getting assistance from other areas in the community,
such as food from local restaurants. Councilor Hawley suggested the task force
remain intact to continue to work on some of the ongoing issues identified in the
report.
There was some discussion on financing and what amount of money was available
to assist a homeless program in Tigard. Mayor Schwartz noted he was willing to
continue to keep the task force in place to work on education and to work with the
staff and City Council to formulate a larger task force with other cities and
jurisdictions. It was noted Kim Brown and Jack Schwab would also like to remain
involved.
City Administrator Monahan said staff would look at some short-term solutions for
the emergency shelter, including checking with the Unified Sewerage Agency and
their facility which formerly housed the Justice Court.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 11
Council meeting recessed at 10:10 p.m.
Council meeting reconvened at 10:19 p.m.
6, Citizen Involvement Team Update
Community Involvement Coordinator Liz Newton reviewed the activity of the Citizen
Involvement Teams. The following issues were discussed:
• !mast CIT
2040 Plan
Parks planning (indoor and Tigard park district - December 6, 1994
meeting)
Subcommittee on land use, transportation, and parks.
South CIT
2040 Plan
Street and road planning (look at Community Development Code)
• Central CIT
Walnut island (formed subcommittee)
99W problems
Community Service Officers (Police Department)
Yard debris program
Y E t IT
City sidewalks - capital improvement program (prioritize)
Speeding in neighborhoods, plus speed humps (ask staff to talk about how
effective they are)
-f
r' Tree ordinance
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 12
,fY. r
Ms. Newton noted that most of the CITs had discussed the trees in October.
Events coming up include:
• Facilkator training
• Developing questionnaire for distribution during December meetings
• An agenda item was added to ask for any issues where there is a need for
communication
Councilor Hunt expressed a concern that the NPOs were more involved than the
CITs. He said he did not feel Council heard enough from the CITs. Ms. Newton
responded that NPOs were involved in items such as land use issues to the City
Council. CITs are being utilized differently and are not necessarily reviewing all
land use issues. Some of the issues the CITs are reviewing are long term, and
take several months for them to work on. Councilor Hunt suggested an area. on
the agenda be set aside to hear from the CIT and to ask them to summarize what
had been discussed and what conclusion they had reached. Ms. Newton noted
she was hoping to get good feedback on the questionnaire.
Mayor Schwartz noted that staff liaisons have been helpful. The staff members
"field" many questions.
Ms. Newton also advised staff utilizes the CITs as they work on programs. For
example, the Walnut extension naming was one area where the CITs were asked
to assist. She advised there is more interaction with staff, but agreed a better job
needs to be done to link the Council to the Citizen Involvement Teams.
Councilor Rohl cited major issues where he would have liked to receive CIT
comments; i.e., tree ordinance, 2040. He noted he would like more of a
connection with the CITs and to hear proposals and requests from CITs.
Councilor Hunt advised he would go to the next CIT meeting to request the CITs
to report to Council on what they have done.
There was further discussion on the difference between the NPOs and the CITs.
Ms. Newton advised that attendance in the CITs fluctuates, depending on what is
on the agenda. Councilor Hunt noted the CIT agreement should be amended to
reinforce some of the concerns that were noted. Ms. Newton suggested they
postpone action on the agreement, noting a more formal communication link to the
Council be formulated with the CITs.
Consensus of Council was to postpone action on Item 3.2 of the Consent Agenda
until after staff has visited with the Citizen Involvement Teams. (Agenda Item 3.2
CITY COUNCIL. MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 13
gil
r
J ` ` h
Y
PJ
was the request for approval of the Citizen Involvement Team agreement). The
Citizen Involvement Team agreement would specify the responsibilities for
communication with the City Council.
7. Region 2040 - Update to Council and Council Discussion
Senior Planner Landsman reviewed the information contained in the packet
material and reviewed highlights of the land use plan. She noted that Washington
Square will be considered a regional center, which will mean it will receive
additional growth and more housing. This area will also receive extra funding. Six
regional centers have been identified. The downtown area was classified as a
"town center." Densities in Tigard are expected to increase. The 2040 Plan
envisions that by the year 2000 there will be 45,000 people in Tigard and by the
year 2040, there will be 49,000.
There was discussion by Council on the different elements presented in the 2040
Plan. There were questions on how the CiTs had received the proposed 2040
Plan. Ms. Landsman advised there has been mixed response from people in the
CITs; primarily, people were seeking information and were concerned about
density.
There is an expectation that Metro Council will approve the 2040 Plan. The new
1995 Metro Council may change or modify the Plan. Ms. Landsman noted staff
advised Metro that there is a need to continue to receive input from local
jurisdictions and that future actions must be more of a cooperative effort. Ms.
Landsman requested that Tigard stay active and involved. From December to
June, there will be another opportunity to make revisions to the 2040 Plan.
8. Review and Approval of Proposed Building Room Use Policy
This issue was removed from the agenda by staff, noting there wera issues which
needed to be reviewed further.
9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at
11:04 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a), (d), (e), (f) & (h) to
discuss employment of public officers and employees, labor relations, real property
transactions, exempt public records and current and pending litigation issues.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 14
Fill
y
10. ADJOURNMENT: 11:27 p.m.
Attest: Catherine Wheatley, City Recorclkr
IL Mlayo , 'ity of Tigard
Date: 1 1'7 ccml 22.94
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1994 - PAGE 15
r
pli
COMMUNITY NE'W`SPAPERS, INC. Legal
PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice TT 8 0 4 2
P.O. SOX 3,70
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 R E. C F I V F. 0
Legal Notice Advertising Nov 16 1994
eCity of Tigard a ❑ Tearsheet Notice CITY OF TIGAR®
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
4Tigard,Oregon 97223 ® ❑ Duplicate Affidavit
.PUBLIC HEARING: ~t
a he foilowiiig will be considci-,d by the Tigard City Council on Nov. -
t99 , at 7;30 F tvI: at the Tigard Civ e;Certle4, Town Hall Itorim.13
trap
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 5:W PTall Biulevaxd ~"iga'rd, Or:.ott Furscr iiitormaEidi~
obtained from t~v £:t?ntintillafy 13evclbpis~e3it~~ctor sir City Record
STATE OF OREGON, ) the same IoCation or by a ailing 639 4174 ?Cc?u aroapvste>;sij~ulsnilt;
_ COUNTY OF dYASHlNGTON, )ss' written testimOriy in advance of the pubiicheariitg, ~~eiatt ands`
Kathy Snyder ~es~mony.tvil! be Gonsidetedat thieiteartng ~The~islslic #ea~h~
t, conductedin accordance with the applrcablc ('8iaptec:IlR otr e 3
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising ;yfluntcigal.Gade; aia any rules of proccd~ teptr`by thez3ct'
Director, or his principal clerk, of the T; Bard-921,a 1 at; n' `rime avtilabtepiCit Hall. _
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at Tigard in thetAGE pig %A i'itlN 7CA l I
aforesaid ounty and state, that theAPy,f~It~
. `J~'CTM'~Sf 9Bt~Ptaxlo
HearincZ A 94-0611 Wert Annex. iIO7~is fl3 7t2 .4~ Butti~~oetntair Road(
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the ` requcst W ante ~n p2r, el gf ppgazczr+ai~Iy 0.46 •ecs ztt ditr
entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and Ci;J of T gard and to change the'campreltensivc plant and ~.csliel to
~,3~bnrgtr?nlrounty R$tttyof Tigardru,s*a d:ns3tgcer€~~al~F: -
consecutive in the following issues: --ZONTE, presently Wa&ngton Gounity R-G ;
November 10 ,1994 i~(?4 -Publish i4ovember0,1914 { rM
z
P9 ember-,t9
Subscribed and sworn to ore me this 10th da~' of Novemb C~- C AL SEAL
t ROF!N A. El
NOT;,RY PLI$,uC - OFEGCtd
lic for Oregon Notary Cr,1Mk !S~,N NO. 02+552
My COI1;~:.ISSt:J+i xp!~ s uA`lIs, ir117
My Commission Expires:
AFFIDAVIT - - -
1 :11 POISON! 1
MEN= EM
.q
_ o
r
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In the Matter of the Proposed
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
City of Tigard )
begin first duly swom, on oath,
depose say:
That ! posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance
Number (s) !3 E~s Q S
which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated 33 k4
copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof,
, 19g
on the 1 °k day of 'D k V*AJA
1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
2. West One Bank, 12260 SW Main Street, Tigard, Oregon
3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
4. Albertson°s Store, Comer of Pacific Hwy. (State Hwy. 99) and SW Durham
Road, Tigard, Oregon
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ! day of T ,gym. . 19 .
oil_ 4AS-U :0
OFFICIAL s aL No ublic for Oregon
f9. J^ANN, HAVES
NOTARY Pi1uUC•OREGON . My Commission Expires: S
COMMISSION NO.005513
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES M' 5, 1995
11.5 .
r & F. ;az ;fib:?-"sh''krS7xsoF f: ti:r~a ti «,5' w" N `y- t ~'M ~}I~
I Iriw.'a.'"r_t.e., ,i.w.. ` _..i »,o....... x V ~.°4s°!gp/~s~ ' t(Umited to 2 minutes or less, please)
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on
other Issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff.
Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
STAFF
NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC CONTACTED
,.oe n o sitors.
x`
Depending on the number of person ravishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount
6of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair
may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to,
supplement oral testimony.
4 s _eu:r'g. 9ee/0w£'r k ,tom
PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION - ZCA 94-0011 - WERT
ANNEXATION
Location: 13970 S.W. Bull Fountain Road (WCTM 2S1 9BD, Tax Lot 1600). A request to annex
one parcel of approximately 0.46 acres into the City of Tigard and to change the Comprehensive
Bolan and Zone from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard medium density residential R-7.
PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS
~N_ y~~~ a Sw ~2yrA.3
PLEASE PRIM
Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against)
rasa
ress
jPe~g
5 I f'h
~'or R Q~
~:ame Name
Address Address
Name
Address Address
e Name
i
fe6~ Address
ie Name
-Address Address
Name Name
Address Address
Name Name
Address Address
Name Name
Address Address
e Name
Address teas
5.
t
Name Name
Address Address
mig
~ f
yyt PROCLAMATION
R:,, hWt81 NATIONAL DRUNK AND DRUGGED DRIVING (31))
Ca x- t.~ 4o PREVENTION MONTH 1994 ,
t t r'd2~Jt
v L WHEREAS, drivers and pedestrians impaired by alcohol and other drugs
- account for nearly 17,500 highway deaths annually; and cs-.
WHEREAS, motor vehicle cashes are the number one cause of death for r u
children, adolescents, and young adults in the United States; and
}
)3
c WHEREAS, alcohol is involved in nearly half of all traffic fatalities; and
-v r-
WHEREAS, injury and property damage resulting from alcohol-impaired
driving cause physical, emotional, and economic hardship for hundreds of
s: thousands of adults and young people, and
WHEREAS, comprehensive community-based strategies to further reduce '
i and prevent impaired driving tragedies are known; and
WHEREAS, health care costs resulting from motor vehicle injuries cost t
American society over $14 billion a Year4and save $35,000 in health care
costs alone for each serious injury that is prevented.
~ WHEREAS, if we take a stand now, we can prevent impaired driving; ~c
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT I, John Schwartz, Mayor
t.~ of the City of Tigard, Oregon, do hereby proclaim December 1994 as
y' National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month in Tigard,
ryW-, Oregon. I also call upon all citizens, government agencies, public and r
private institutions, businesses, hospitals, and schools in Tigard, Oregon to j
promote awareness of causes of driver impairment, existing and proposed i
a; d laws intended to further reduce and prevent impaired driving, and
opportunities to establish safer and healthier norms regarding the use of ' .
alcohol and other drugs for all citizens, particularly young people.
Dated this day of .1994.
.'m IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the ?x
Seal of the City of Tigard to be affixed.
John Schwartz, Mayor 'z*
City of Tigard
. Attest:
' City Recorder
a y c s1 °I•t ' /
o
ill ION i
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 94-,:)S'-
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZCA 94-
11, Wert) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, The City Council held a public hearing on November 22, 1994, to consider
initiating annexation and to consider land use and zoning designations for one
parcel located at 13970 SW Bull Mountain Road; and
WHEREAS, on November 22, 1994, the City Council approved a resolution forwarding
the annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary
.Commission; and
WHEREAS, the land use and zoning district designations recommended by the
planning staff as set forth in the attached staff report and in Section 1 below
are that which most closely conforms to the Washington County land use and zoning
designations.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Upon annexation, the subject properties shall be designated as
follows:
Tax Map/Lot Number Current Land Use New Land Use
2S1 9BD lot 1600 Wash. Co. R-6 Medium Density
Residential
Current Zoning New Zoning
Wash. Co. R-6 Tigard R-7
Section 2: This ordinance shall become effective upon filing of the
annexation final order with the office of the Secretary of State.
PASSED: By /M 4-%Dr+~J vote of all Council members present after
being read by number and "tle only, this c~l_ a~f' L~day ofNOVOit s,„
Cath/e~r~ine tdheatley, Cit " ecorder
APPROVED : This day of 1994.
Schwartz, May 6r'
Approved as to form:
'•.4 J V
CyY~ ttorney
Date
i1gli
5
r
AGENDA ITEM For Agenda of DlaalcfLl
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Cozen involvement Team Agreement
PREPARED BY: Liz Newton DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Acceptance of the Citizen Involvement Team Agreements
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Accept the attached Citizen Involvement Team Agreement and direct staff to
print and distribute to Citizen Involvement Team members and others
interested.
INFORMATION SU14MARY
OThe attached Citizen Involvement Agreement has been reviewed by the City
Council and Citizen Involvement Team Facilitators twice. Suggested revisions
have been incorporated into this draft. The agreement will be used to
familiarize Citizen Involvement Team members and participants and others
interested about the Citizen Involvement Team program.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
FISCAL NOTES
Cost to print 2,000 copies is estimated at $300.00 and is budgeted in account
# 312-620.
LWM a=
5ubcommittee5 n The agenda topics and time frames will CI F TWA
be reviewed at the beginning of each CITIZEN
Each CIT may establish subcommittees to re- meeting to ensure that all items can be
search and report on issues or topics the INVOLVEMENT
members regard as of interest or importance, covered in the time frames allocated.
5ubcommittee5 may identify and research is- n Agendas will provide time for an-TEAM AGREEMENT
sues and report back to the full CIT member- nouncemerte that members wish to
sh;p. The subcommittees may research and make on items that may be of intereetto
develop strategies to address concerns and
present their findings to the full CIT. The sub- other members. The person wishing to
committees shall not act as a hearings body, make the announcement should notify
V4A MIT
but may monitor land use activity, host meet- the Facilitator before the meeting starts
J'CIT
inge between interested parties, and provide so time can be allocated.
input to hearings bodies. CIT subcommittees n Each agenda will include time for mom-
may suggest projects to pursue to the full CIT bere to ask questions or raise concerns
membership. If the full CIT membership elects PURPOSE*
not to pursue a project the subcommittee about ANY topic. Dependirg on time
may proceed on its'own but shall report on the available, time limits may be set on indi- The Citizen Involvement Teams (CIT9) serve as
status of the project at each CIT meeting. victual speakers. Members interested in broad based organized forums for the identifi-
speaking during this time should sign on cation of the publics concerns and values.
The subcommittees are not required to hold the sheet provided so the Facilitator can
regular meetings. The city will provide informa- allocate adequate time. WIRAT E CI4
tion and resources for subcommittee meet- CITe are grassroots, neighborhood groups es-
ings provided a majority of subcommittee n Each agenda will include an opportunity tabliehed to:
members will be in attendance and other inter- for members to suggeettopice for future
n Educate citizens on issues and
ested parties are welcome to attend. agendas. Preference will be given to those process,
topics of interest to the highest number and create better access to the deci-
Meetitig Procedure of participants. lion-making process.
a Meetings will start promptly at 7:00 p.m. Members will respectthe role of the Facilitator n Encourage citizens to address neighbor-
and end promptly at 9:00 p.m., unless a and will speak only after being recognized by hood problems, identify issues of con-
later adjournment is agreed to by a ma- the Facilitator. Members will respect others cern, and communicate issues to
rights to speak and not interrupt. The Facili- decision makers.
jority of members present. tator shall remain neutral on all topics while
n Time limits will be set for each agenda facilitating the meeting. The Facilitator shall n Provide a platform for citizens and the
item and will be, enforced by the make every attempt to allow all in attendance tools to ensure action on issues.
Facilitator. to participate. After the agenda has been
reviewed and set at the beginning of the meet- NOW E (i ORS
El Time limits may be enforced on individual ing, the Facilitator can modify it only if agreed
participants, if the Facilitator deter- to by a majority of the members.
Member5hip
mines its necessary to accommodate all
of those wishing to speak. CIT meetings shall be open to all interested
In ?g4 Quadons? CaH persons. Anyone in atter0anceshall be allowed
dN ~tl Y~y
I'M
1=1 OEM= I
to participate in discussions and be. given an Facilitators set and enforced by the facilitator. Members
opportunity to ask questions or raise issues and visitors shall recognize the facilitator's
or, allowed on the agenda. Each CIT has three trained Facilitators. The function. At the end of each meeting, the
Facilitators are responsible for facilitating the members shall reach consensus on the agenda
Members arethose participants who can vote meetings, the meeting record, scheduling and topics for-!;he next month's meeting.
and request items be placed on the agenda. setting meetings with input from the mem-
Members are defined as follows: bers. Facilitators also serve as contacts with Voting ng
City Departments and other CITe. When facili-
D Any resident of the CIT area. tating a meeting, the Facilitator shall remain As much as practical, the CIT9 shall make
13 Residents of anyCiTareathat choose to neutral. Members shall recognizethe authority decisions by consensus. Ifthemembership de-
be a member of a CIT area in which they of the Facilitator to set time limits, recognize cider a vote is necessary to decide an issue,
speakers, and keep order. Facilitators may the meeting Facilitatorshallconductthevoti
are not a resident. In this case, the indi- rotate duties as they wish. Only members who were preseritduring discus-
vidual may NOT be a member of the CIT in elon of the item may vote. Members must be
which they are a resident but may attend Facilitators shall be selected by the CIT mem- present to vote. If the vote is not unanimous,
and participate in those meetings as a hers to Facilitator positions at the October ALL minority position(s) shall also be recorded
visitor. CIT meeting of each year. When selecting Fa- and presented with the majority position.
cilitators, members shall give preference to
Q Each business in a CIT area shall be, al- members of their CIT but Facilitators need not Agendas
lower.! one representative at each meet- be members of the CIT in which they facilitate.
!ng -to serve as a member. Other Terms shall be for two years and shall be Major agenda topics shall be set by consensus
individuals representing the business staggered so that at least one Facilitator of the members at the end of each meeting for
may attend as visitors. term expires each October. There shall be no the next meeting. Time shall also be allocated
limit to the number of terms a Facilitator can for subcommittee reports, if appropriate, and
a Nonresident property owners shall be al- serve. Facilitators MUST complete city paid for members to ask questions or raise issues
lowed one representative at each meet- Facilitator training within three months of on topics not related to the main agenda. At
!ng to serve ae a member. Other election. the beginning of each meeting, the agenda shall
individuals representing the property be reviewed and may be. modified if agreed to
may attend as visitors. Meetings by majority consensus of members present.
Members and visitors shall sign in on the Agenda highlights for each CIT shall be mailed
9n Monthly meetings of each CIT shall be held at to all postal patrons in each CIT every month
sheets provided when attending meetings. aregulartimeandplace setbytheFacilitators and published in the Tigard Times. Agendas
Members and visitors shall also wear name with input from the members. Topics for the shall be. mailed at least 5 days in advance of
tags provided to assistthe Facilitators when meetings shall be determined by the members. each CIT meeting to everyone listed on the
recognizing members and visitors to speak. The Facilitators shall be responsible for notil attendance roster.
Members and visitors shall follow the ground cation to the city so that agendas can be
rules established by the membership and ad- prepared and arrangements can be. made for
ministered by the meeting Facilitator. Mem- speakers and presentations.
bers and visitors shall recognize the role of the Time shall be allowed at each CIT meeting for
Facilitator to conduct the meeting in an or, subcommittee reports, if appropriate, and for
deny manner. members to ask questions or raise issues of
concern or interest. In order to accommodate
agenda topics, time limits on speakers may be
t
RUDE I; IlliIIII'll, I
AGENDA ITEM #
For Agenda of II as ICN
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Disposal of Gaarde property _lot #7
PREPARED BY: Wayne DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Shall the City Council authorize the quitclaim of lot #7 to the adjacent
property owners.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City quitclaim this lot to the adjacent property
owners.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City completed the Gaarde street improvement in 1993. The City council
by resolution 93-15 declared the three substandard remnant parcels should be
sold. A sealed bid sale was held in which no qualified bids were received.
Ordinance 94-06 streamlined the procedures to be followed in the disposition
of substandard parcels. Then resolution 94-15 authorized staff to determine
the existence of interested parties and to negotiate for the sale of the
property. The amended TMC 3.44 also requires that any agreement be presented
to the Council before any final conveyance takes place.
We have discussed the disposition of lot #7 with Mr and Mrs Ryan. The Ryan's
own a duplex adjacent to the property directly to the north. It is their
desire to attach the remnant lot to their existing property so that they can
maintain it and use it to install a sound barrier along Gaarde.
We believe that it is in the best interest of the City to deed this property
to the Ryan's. We are proposing to charge only for the cost of the
transaction to the City up to a maximum of $500. This reduces the further
cost to the City of carrying the property and trying to sell it. This
arrangement also relieves the City from having to maintain the property.
Although an appraisal was done on this property in 1993 that determined its
value at $2,000, we believe that it has no market value because it has no
utility to anyone who does not own adjacent property.
The attached resolution authorizes the Finance Director to proceed with the
quitclaim of the deed to this property to the Ryan's.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Advertise and attempt to sell again.
FISCAL NOTES
GNone
S r
PREP L- 1
SUPS-US
S -VIP R
4
GARDEN F~ARK PLACE
S.W•
? LQT 13
LQT 8
LQT #1{cDpNALD STREE
ARDE S~.
MEw GA Al
Z
.V
_~f Q
s~ Q
s~~Fr
4161
2682
113 1847
, .
PrA
AGENDA ITEM # 3. L4 Q-,
For Agenda of November 22, 1994
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award construction contract for 98th Avenue Storm Sewer
CIP
PREPARED BY: A DEPT HEAD OK r CITY ADMIN OK
ISSUE BEFORE. THE COUNCIL
Shall the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for the construction
of'the 98th Avenue Storm Sewer CIP?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, award the contract to Miller
and Sons Construction.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The purpose of the project is to improve drainage at the intersection of SW
98th Avenue and Scott Court (south of Greenburg Road).
The Following Bids were received:
3D Construction, Aloha $38,083.74
Eudaly Bros., Portland $35,739.00
Brock Construction, Salem $30,370.00
Kerr Contractors, Tualatin $29,491.00
NW EEEZZZ Lay Drain, Gresham $29,208.70
Systems Const. Co., Portland $28,603.00
Golden Valley Const., Dallas $25,895.00
Lorin A. Meyer, Monmouth $24,852.25
Seminole Envir, Silverton $24,593.35
Miller & Sons, Sherwood $24,361.15
Engineer's Estimate: $25,000.00
Miller & Sons has successfully completed a number of similar projects for the
City.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Reject all bids.
FISCAL NOTES
his project is part of the 1994-95 Capital Improvement Program approved by
council on August 23, 1994, with a budget of $25,000.
Mam
AGENDA ITEM # 3. 1-1 b
For Agenda of November 22, 1994
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award construction contract for 100th Avenue Storm Sewer
CIP
PREPARED BY: APO DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Shall the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for the construction
of the 100th Avenue Storm Sewer CIP?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, award the contract to Golden
Valley Construction.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The purpose of the project is to improve drainage along SW 100th Avenue from
SW View Terrace to SW McDonald Street.
The Following Bids were received:
Kerr Contrators, Tualatin $60,954.00
D & D Concrete, Tualatin $56,840.00
CEMS, Inc., Vancouver $51,129.00
Seminole Env., Inc., Silverton $48,383.00
3DC, Beaverton $44,440.30
Paul Lambson Const., Vancouver $43,860.00
Gelco Construction, Salem $43,473.00
J.T. Inc., Portland $37,580.40
Brock Construction, Inc., Salem $37,173.50
Lorin A. Meyer Const., Dallas $32,627.50
System Construction, Portland $32,111.00
Golden Valley Construction, Dallas $29,422.OJ
Engineer's Estimate: $42,000.00
~t
Golden Valley Construction recently installed a water main in SW North Dakota
St. Project staff report that this contractor's work was satisfactory.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Reject all bids.
FISCAL NOTES
his project was added to the 1994-95 Capital Improvement Program by amend-
ment approved by Council on September 27, 1994, with a budget of $49,000.00.
r
AGENDA ITEM #
For Agenda of Ugmember 22, 1994
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE
PREPARED BY: John Acker DEFT MEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK G~
ISSUE BEF®RE THE COUNT
Should the City request bids to construct a replacement boat dock and ramp at
the Tualatin River waterfront in Cook Park?
STAFF RECO~NDATI()H
Staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board authorize the City to
request bids for the Cook Park boat dock and ramp replacement project.
INFORI~lAT~AN SURX
in accordance with City purchasing rules, authorization is requested to
advertise for construction bids for the Cook Park boat dock and rump
replacement project.
The purpose of this project is to replace the aging boat dock and ramp with
a new handicapped accessible unit. The new facility will meet ADA standards.
The City was awarded and has accepted two grants for a total amount of
$17,350 to replace the existing ramp and floating boat at Cook Park. These
grants; one for $13,012 from the State Marine Board, and one for $4,335 from
the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, will fund about two-thirds of the
project. The Department of Fish and Wildlife has verbally agreed to fund any
remaining costs after bids are received. The project cost is estimated to be
$25,545. If needed, an alternative source of funding could be the Park Levy
Fund which has sufficient unallocated funds.
Do not replace the dock and ramp and refuse the grant money.
FISCAL NOTES
Marine Board staff designed the project and wrote the specifications for bid.
The City has accepted $17,350 in grants for construction of the project.
According to the engineerts estimate there may be a difference of $5,195 that
would be paid by the Department of Fish and Wildlife.
I~
AGENDA ITEM #
For Agenda of November 22, 1994
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Wert Annexation (ZCA 4-11)
PREPARED BY: Ray Valone DEPT HEAD OK " CITY ADMIN OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Should the City Council forward to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local
Government Boundary Commission a request to initiate annexation of one parcel
consisting of approximately 0.46 acres located at 13970 Bull Mountain Road?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached resolution and ordinance to forward the annexation to the
Boundary Commission and to assign plan and zone designations to the property
in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and Urban Planning Area Agreement.
s• INFORMATION SUMMARY
The annexation request consists of one parcel totaling approximately 0.46
acres which is contiguous to the City of. Tigard. The area is located within
Tigard's Area of Interest on Bull Mountain Road. The owners of the property
request annexation to obtain sanitary sewer service. Attached is a
resolution initiating annexation and an ordinance to change the zone
designation from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard R-7 in conformance
with the City's Urban Planning Area Agreement with Washington County. This
annexation conforms with City policies on annexation.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Deny the proposal.
FISCAL NOTES
Since this area is not within Tigard's Active Planning Area, the applicant is
responsible for the Boundary Commission-annexation fee of $215.
MIMI gig!
STAFF REPORT
November 22, 1994
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
TIGARD TOWN HALL
13125 S.W. HALL BOULEVARD
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
A. FACTS:
CASE: Zone Change Annexation 94-11
REQUEST: To annex one parcel of approximately 0.46 acres of
unincorporated Washington County to the City of Tigard and to
change the comprehensive plan and zone from Washington County
R-6 (Residential, 6 units per acre) to City of Tigard medium
density residential, R-7 (Residential, 7 units per acre).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Washington County R-6
ZONING DESIGNATION: Washington County R-6 (Residential, 6 units per
acre).
APPLICANT: Stephen and Sharon Wert
10830 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
OWNERS: Same
LOCATION: The southwest corner of Bull Mountain Road and 139th Avenue,
WCTM 2S19BD, lot 1600.
1. Background Information
No previous applications have been reviewed by the City relating to
this property.
Vicinity Information
Properties to the east, south and west are in Washington County.
These parcels have single-family residences and are zoned R-6. The
property to the north (across Bull Mountain Road) is in the City of
Tigard and zoned R-7(PD); it is part of the Hillshire subdivision.
3. Site Information and Proposal Description
tirF'`
The property to be annexed has one single family residence on a
large lot. The property has frontage on Bull Mountain Road, which
is functionally classified as a major collector.
ZCA 94-11 Staff Report 1
IWO
4. Agency Comments
The Tigard Engineering Department, Tigard Police Department, Tigard
Water Department and PGE have reviewed the proposal and have no
objections. No other comments were received when this report was
submitted.
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The relevant criteria in this case are the following City policies:
A. Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, requiring an ongoing
citizen involvement program; 10.1.1, requiring adequate service capacity
delivery to annexed parcels; and 10.1.2, listing boundary criteria for
annexations.
B. Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136, providing the
process and requirements for annexations and 18.138, providing standards
for the land classification of annexed territory; and the Urban Planning
Area Agreement (UPAA) between the City and Washington County.
The planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with
the relevant portions of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan based upon the
findings noted below:
1. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the West Citizens
Involvement Team and the surrounding property owners were given
notice of the public hearing.
2. Plan Policy 10.1.1 is satisfied because the Police Department and
other service providers indicate that adequate services are
available in the vicinity and may be extended to accommodate the
subject property.
3. Plan Policy 10. is satisfied because the proposed annexation
will not create a boundary irregularity in this area; the Police
Department has been notified of this request; the land is located
within Tigard's Area of Interest and is contiguous to the City
boundary; and adequate service capacities are available to
accommodate the property.
The planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with
the relevant portions of the Community Development Code and UPAA based
upon the findings noted below:
1. Section 18.136.030 of the Code, requiring the following approval
standards for annexation proposals, has been satisfied:
All services and facilities are available and have sufficient
capacity to provide service for the proposed annexation area; the
applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and implementing ordinance
ZCA 94°11 Staff Report 2
12 1
.~3 q
provisions have been satisfied; the plan and zoning designation
placed on the property shall be the City's designations which most
closely implements the existing County comprehensive plan map
designation; and the determination of whether the property is an
established or developing area will be based on the standards
contained in Chapter 18.138 of the Code.
2. Chapter 18.138 of the Code is satisfied because the property meets
the definition of and will be designated as a developing area on
the development standards area map.
3. The UPAA between the City and Washington County requires that upon
annexation of land within the Area of Interest, the City convert
County plan designations to City plan designations which most
closely approximate the density, use provisions and standards of
County designations. This property is within Tigard!s Area of
Interest and, as such, will be designated medium density
residential land use and R-7 zone. These designations are the
closest comparable designations to the present Washington County
designations of R-6.
C. RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the findings noted above, the planning staff recommends
approval of ZCA 94-11.
ZCA94-11.stf
ZCA 94-11 Staff Report 3
i
.t
NOV-22-94 TUE 17 :39 RARCEL PLUS R. ®2
COU41&I
November 22, 1994 /G
City of Tigard
33125 Std Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: File No. LCA* 94-0®11
Hert Annexation
Applicant: Sharon & Steve Wert
13970 Sod Bull Mountain Rd.
Tigard, OR 97224
Dear Sirs,
lie live meat door to the applicant property at 14555 SW 139th
Ave, and are protesting the change of zoning from R-6 to R-7. This
neighborhood is a nice residential area with large logs, low traffic,
low density housing, making for a quiet and peaceful area.
We want to keep the same character that makes this area so
attractive. By allowing 1&7 zoning it would facilitate a change in
the nature of our neighborhood. t
We do not have a problem with our neighbors hooking up to tht
sewer. However, we do have a problem increasing the housing density
as part of the price to pay in order to join the city of Tigard.
We ourselves could at some point in time like to be part rif the
city of Tigard in order to have the better services provided by the
city, however if it means that we have to be rezoned to higher
density, then we do not want to join Tigard. Surely, the city has
another way of allowing annexation without forcing a zone change to
medium density residential R-7. If the city does not currently have
another way, then it needs to make a way that people can have their
property be made a part of Tigard without having to rezone it to R-7.
We are responding by mail because we are temporarily out of town
and could not be at the meeting in person. Please give us every
consideration as if we were present.
Sincerely,
R n~,ldl Thompson Cecilia 1. Thompsoi
1! 1=0111111 FMIMM
COUNCIL ITEM NO. 5
MEETING DATE: 11/22/94
flu V,
s ""ask Force
City of' 'Tis"ard
A report to the Mayor and Council of the City of Tigard
and the greater Tigard community
Prepared by the Homeless Task Force:
Rob Blakely Tigard Christian Church
Kiln Brown Interfaith Outreach Services
Christopher Craske Interfaith Outreach Services
Rick Peltier Oregon Drive Azle Supply
Jack Schwab Pearson Financial Group
Kelly Sholes Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce
Wes Taylor Tigard United Methodist Church
Paul Hunt City Council Liaison
Sgt. Chuck Martin Tigard Police Liaison
November 22, 1994
1, lip 11
a 51,4-
City of Tigard Homeless Task P®rce
Action Plan
Introduction
On August 23, 1994, the City Council of the City of Tigard created a task force to study
issues of homelessness in the community. The council noted that over the past several
months the number of homeless people in the city appeared to have steadily increased.
The council also noted that the activities of certain homeless people had drawn attention to
the plight of the homeless and led local merchants and other concerned citizens to ask that
appropriate steps be taken to address the growing problem.
The following individuals have served on the task force and what follows is their report:
Rob Blakely Tigard Christian Church
Kim Brown Interfaith Outreach Services
Christopher Craske Interfaith Outreach Services
Rick Peltier Oregon Drive Axle Supply
Jack Schwab Pearson Financial Group
Kelly Sholes Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce
Wes Taylor Tigard United Methodist Church
Paul Hunt City Council Liaison
Sgt. Chuck Martin Tigard Police Liaison
Charge to the Task Force
The resolution creating the task force charged the group with the responsibility of assessing
the following:
® extent of the homeless issue in Tigard;
® the needs of Tigard's homeless;
® the availability and need for shelters to house Tigard's homeless;
® the availability and need for additional social services for the homeless;
® areas of conflict between Tigard's homeless and other segments of Tigard's
population, including, but not limited to
a) property owners;
b) owners, operators and employees in commercial business areas;
c) users of city parks and open spaces;
d) neighborhoods.
The Homeless in Our Community
There is no "typical" homeless person. Many people's image of a homeless person is that
of a single man clutching a wine bottle in a downtown doorway. Many of the homeless are
single men and many of the homeless have problems with alcohol or drug abuse, but
yu .
single women also become homeless, as do childless couples and, increasingly, families
with children. It is difficult to put together an accurate statistical portfolio of the homeless,
since many do not seek or may even avoid help from the social service system. No data
exists on the number of homeless people in Tigard itself. However, a recent report on
homelessness to the Washington County Community Action Agency (WCCAO) reveals
the following general findings:
* there are approximately 1,700 single people, 3,420 family units, and 1080
childless couples who are homeless each year in Washington County;
0 38% of homeless families are headed by women;
0 21 % are employed at the time they become homeless;
• 48% are experiencing their first episode of homelessness;
o 39% have past or present alcohol/drug abuse issues;
® domestic violence, childhood physical/sexual abuse, mental illness, emotional
trauma, and lack of a support network can all be contributing factors to
homelessness;
• 57% of all homeless people in Washington County are families with children.
The WCCAO report, which is the source of most of the statistical information cited in this
report is too long to reproduce and append to this report. Copies are available from
WCCAO upon request.
The primary cause of homelessness is poverty. The fastest growing homeless population in
Washington County is the "working poor." These are people who work minimum wage
jobs ($4.75 per hour) and cannot afford rent. Average rental cost of a two-bedroom
apartment in Washington County is $528 per month. Low-income earners in our
community often must choose between eating and paying rent. There is no affordable
housing for this population in Tigard and the waiting list for subsidized housing can be as
long as three years. Experts contend that many thousands of the working poor in our
community are only one missed paycheck away from homelessness.
Available Resources
There are only two general access homeless shelters in Washington County. Interfaith
Outreach Services operates a 14-bed shelter in Tigard that serves both families and single
individuals. That shelter is open ordy October through May. WCCAO operates a 24-bed
shelter in Hillsboro that serves families and is open year-round. In addition, the
Domestic Violence Resource Center operates a 21-bed shelter for its women clients and
their children, and there are a handful of beds in the county that serve special populations,
such as programs at Luke-Dorf, Inc. or Harmony House, Inc. The total wintertime shelter
capacity in the county for those not involved in a special program is only 38 beds. In the
summer the capacity is only 24 beds and none of those beds are available to single men.
A Band Up Not a Handout
The homeless shelters in Washington County are not simply warehouses of the
unfortunate, where no questions are asked and nothing is expected. Both Interfaith
Outreach and WCCAO operate "self-sufficiency" programs designed to help shelter
patrons deal with the issues that led them to their present circumstances. In order to
remain sheltered, a person must work daily on his or her "issues."
The numbers of the homeless set out earlier in this report do not take into account those
people in Washington County who are camping, sleeping in cars, or who have not tried
to find shelter. It has been estimated that approximately 300 to 400 people are camping
around Beaverton, Durham, King City, Sherwood, Tigard, and Tualatin. For most of
those individuals or families there simply is "no room at the inn." A few others may be too
proud to seek assistance or are satisfied with a solitary lifestyle.
This task force does not believe any provision should be made for those homeless
individuals who choose to remain in that lifestyle. It is enough for us to concentrate our
efforts on those who want to work themselves out of homelessness.
Another small group may be antagonistic to mainstream society and resist any efforts to
assist them. It was a few such individuals who became a nuisance in central Tigard earlier
this year and whose presence indirectly lead to the formation of this task force. ]Public
inebriation,- disorderly conduct, and harrassment are inappropriate at any time and without
regard to economic class. These are matters for the police.
Concurrent with the deliberations of this task force, the City of Tigard is in the process of
adopting three public safety ordinances which should give the police the tools they need to
deal with that small minority of the homeless which can be an actual danger to our
community. One of the ordinances regulates consumption of alcoholic beverages in public
places. Another ordinance prohibits camping in public places. The third ordinance gives
the police additional tools to address disorderly conduct. The ordinances were written with
the participation of Interfaith Outreach Services and are not intended to roust homeless
people from campsites in the community runless they are engaged in illegal activities or
living in conditions that raise serious health and sanitary concerns.
A Call to Action
Homelessness has existed in Tigard, as in every city, since before the city was founded. A
shelter was opened in Tigard in 1989 in response to the obvious need at that time. Since
then homelessness has increased dramatically. In the 1991/92 fiscal year, 4,073
households in Washington County requested shelter due to homelessness. Interfaith
Outreach and WCCAO were able to shelter 365 of those households, which translates to a
total of 3,708 unserved homeless households in that year. As a community we were able
to shelter less than 10% of the households in need.
In the month of October, 1994, Interfaith Outreach sheltered 38 individuals and 60
individuals were sheltered by WCCAO. 362 people were turned away due to lack of
space, most of whom were families with children.
The fastest growing segment of the homeless population is children. These children are
victimized by a situation over which they have no control. Many homeless children lack
peers to interact with, have irregular schooling patterns, often suffer from health and dental
problems, but rarely see a doctor and never see a dentist. They are often exposed to
danger. Specific behavioral characteristics of homeless children include limited social
skills, especially in groups, withdrawn behavior, poor self-care skills, aggressive behavior,
sr` ' delayed language development, and difficulty with imaginative thinking, among others.
Clearly, our community must respond to this ever-growing problem before it grows beyond
our control. Hollers spent now and services and facilities provided now can help break the
cycle of homelessness and give these children an opportunity to develop into responsible,
productive adults. This is not only the City of Tigard's problem. This is a national
problem which our community can best address at the local level. Because of geographical
and economic overlap, the cities of Beaverton, Durham, King City, Sherwood, Tigard, and
Tualatin and the residential, business, church, and social service communities in all those
cities can have a major positive impact on the problems of homelessness in eastern
Washington County if we act together.
Recommendations to the City Council
The City of Tigard Homeless Task Force recommends to the City Council that the findings
and recommendations of this Action Plan be adopted by resolution and incorporated into
the council's formal goals and objectives and be put into action immediately. The
recommendations are:
1. Everyone, regardless of economic circumstance, should have shelter from the
elements. The City of Tigard should immediately adopt a severe weather
policy to help provide such shelter on an emergency basis;
2. Homelessness is a major problem in our community, but it is ail invisible
problem. The City of Tigard should immediately facilitate an effort to
educate the public about the problem of homelessness and what can be
done as a community to assist the homeless.
3. The number of homeless shelter beds in eastern Washington County is totally
inadequate. The City of Tigard should immediately facilitate the formation
of an action-oriented task force In eastern Washington County to site and
equip an additional permanent homeless shelter and provide
self-sufticlency programs for the people sheltered there.
4. In the long range, other programs should be instituted or expanded to help
people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. The eastern Washington
County task force should facilitate a county-wide effort to establish a
Washington County detoxification center and achieve significant increases In
transitional and affordable housing options.
Severe Weather Policy
Inclement weather, particularly cold weather, poses a substantial health risk to homeless
people without adequate shelter. No one should face hypothermia or death when there are
resources in the community that can be used to minimize the risk. A severe weather
shelter, open on an emergency, occasional basis should not be expensive to establish or
operate and could be opened now before the arrival of truly cell winter weather.
P
The task force believes such a severe weather facility can be located at the Tigard Senior
Center and be available for use almost immediately. The basement is a heated space with
bathrooms. It is not used at night, has a seperate entrance and parking area, and can be
secured from the other uses of the building. The kitchen is adequate to prepare or reheat
the simple meals that would be offered to shelter patrons. As an emergency facility, with
cots, it has space to sleep approximately 50 people.
The severe weather shelter would be opened under the following conditions:
® when temperatures are predicted to fall below 35 degrees for two or more
consecutive days; and/or
o when snow or other weather conditions are deemed severe enough to present a
substantial health risk to homeless persons.
The shelter would be operated by Interfaith Outreach Services and that agency would have
the responsibility for all operating costs, except for rent and utilities at the Senior Center,
which would be provided by the City of Tigard. The decision to open the shelter would be
made by the director of Interfaith Outreach or by the on-duty watch commander of the
Tigard Police Department. The shelter would be opened to all on a first-come, first-served
basis. Eligibility for a bed at the shelter would not depend on participation in a
self-sufficiency program. /However, Interfaith Outreach would have the authority to deny
admission or continued shelter to any persons intoxicated to the point of being unable to
care for themselves or who, by their actions or in the judgement of the shelter staff pose a
risk to other shelter patrons. The shelter staff would make reasonable efforts to segregate
singie men from single women and families.
This shelter would only be open on an emergency, occasional basis from November
through April. The severe weather facility would not have showers or storage space for
patrons' personal belongings. It would not have a staff of case managers to help people
deal with the long term issues of homelessness. It would not replace the need for a
permanent additional shelter.
Public Education Plan
It is obvious that the problem of homelessness is a big problem in our community, but it is
an invisible problem. Most ordinary citizens are surprised to discover that there are
homeless people in Tigard. Most of us tend to think of this as an issue for Portland, rather
than for a suburban city. The public is unaware of the facts or chooses to ignore the
problem. But this problem can only be addressed by the whole community. Efforts must
be made to educate the people of our community about homelessness, about what
measures can be taken to alleviate homelessness, and that those measures are not out of
reach for our community.
The task force recommends that the findings and recommendations of this Action Plan be
disseminated to the public and to selected interest groups in several ways, including the
following:
1. A continuing series of articles in Cityscape, outlining this report and future
actions taken as a result of its recommendations;
2. One or more public forums scheduled to increase community awareness of
homelessness, talk about myths and stereotypes affecting the homeless, and
discuss plans to help families and individuals on to the road to self-sufficiency.
These forums should seek out the public in different ways, including:
a) sessions with each of Tigard's Citizen Involvement Teams;
b) appearances before area chambers of commerce; service clubs,
parent-student organizations, and other community interest groups;
c) one or more Open House events at the Interfaith Outreach Shelter;
d) productions on local public access cable television;
e) teaching units and/or assemblies in local schools;
f) articles in church publications; and
3. Training sessions with police officers, firefighters, public works
employees, utility cocapw+_y workers, and others, on appropriate ways to
identify and interact with the homeless population.
4. Coordination with public awareness campaigns in neighboring communities.
The city's Community Involvement Coordinator should be the person responsible for
assembling the people and resources necessary to carry out this element of the Action Plan.
Eastern Washii Won County Task Force
The task force believes the City and community of Tigard can accomplish the siting of a
severe weather shelter for the homeless and can undertake to learn more about the
homeless and how best to provide treatment for this spreading social malady. But Tigard
alone cannot be expected to do more.
That is why the task force recommends that the City Council work with Washington
County and the councils of other eastern Washington County cities to take this discussion
to a more regional audience. Such a task force should have the official approval of the
County Commission and the councils of Beaverton, Durham, King City, Sherwood,
Tigard, and Tualatin. The task force should be comprised of nine members, as follows:
• two elected mayors or councilors;
• one city staff member,
• one local police official;
• one Interfaith Outreach Services representative;
• one other local social service agency representatives;
• two local religious community representatives; and
• one Washington County Housing Services representative.
It would be important for the nine positions to be widely spread among the several
jurisdictions involved. This more regional group would have authority from the cities to
site a new homeless shelter in eastern W=111dngton County. Ideally, the new facility should
have a capacity of 30 beds for single men and 30 beds for single women, childless
v
couples, and families in segregated quarters. All patrons would be screened for admittance
and must agree to participate in the operating agency's self-sufficiency programs. Interfaith
Outreach Services has already developed a model for how such a shelter would operate
and how much the operation would cost.
Long Range Issues
This regional group should also look at two long-range issues of homelessness:
1. Many homeless people have alcohol or drug problems and often first come to
the attention of shelter program operators when they have been picked up by
the police for public inebriation. In that condition a person is unable to start
dealing with the causes of his or her homelessness and cannot be admitted to
one of the shelters. Instead, such a person is taken into Portland for admittance
into Hooper Detoxification, the regions only detox center. For many, that has
been the first step to sobriety and the end of homelessness. There are
indications that Hooper may not be always be available to westside police
agencies on the present terms. The time to plan for a Washington County
facility or secure long-term access to Hooper is now.
2. Transitional housing programs are designed to provide long-term housing (up
to two years) for homeless people while they work on problems that simply
cannot be adequately addressed in a 3-6 week emergency shelter stay.
Placement in transitional housing allows families time to continue working
toward self-sufficiency and dramatically increases their chances of escaping the
cycle of poverty and dependency. More than 75% of the households sheltered
in Washington County last year (approximately 295 households) would have
qualified for transitional housing if it had been available. Incredibly, there are
only 9 units of transitional housing today in our county.
3. Another issue the regional task force should study is the dearth of affordable
housing in Washington County. Existing government and non-profit
sponsored housing currently serves only 37% of Portland area residents who
qualify for housing assistance. Rental vacancy rates m. Washington County are
very low, which drives prices higher. In our county there are 9,749 households
that have income of less than $10,000 a year. Affordable rent for those
households would have to be $250/month or less. But the average rent for a
small studio apartment in Tigard is about $335/month. County-wide there is a
maximum of 2,716 private rental units that could be considered affordable for
those 9,749 households. The inventory of public housing and Section 8 -2-1
units in the county is limited and must expand. At best, there is public housing
assistance for 2,980 households.
Conclusion
It should be clear from the findings outlined in this report that the number of homeless
people in our community is very high and the numbers are increasing quickly. The only
thing that is typical about all homeless people is that they are without a home. The
homeless come from all races and creeds. The homeless are single mien, single women,
Y
N 111 1:1
MORIN !I
1911'M WIN,, IIIiI;-:I'IIkIIiiI
`c ,a Y
d
Q~
childless couples, and families with children. It should also be clear that there is an urgent
need for additional facilities and services for this homeless population.
The Tigard community must have an opportunity to learn more about this growing social
issue and ways we can all help people with a hand up. The Tigard community can also
help in one very immediate way. No person should be, at risk for lack of shelter in a winter
storm and winter is upon us. As a community we should act quickly to open an emegency
shelter for use during severe weather conditions. We have a facility that would be
appropriate for this use, on an occasional basis, and we have an experienced agency that
can operate the facility.
But homelessness is pervasive far beyond the city limits of Tigard. Our City Council
should be congratulated for their willingness to address this issue, but there is a limited
amount any one community can accomplish The programs and facilities that do exist for
the homeless in eastern Washington County receive local government funding, but they
exist primarily due to the efforts of local churches and the non-profit community. This
task force is recommending a major expansion of those programs and facilities, which
will require a much broader base of support.
Churches and social service agencies must continue their involvement and those in other
cities will have to join in. The business community has not played much of a role to date,
and must give their support. Public funding will have to be increased and government may
well need to be creative to find these extra dollars. Someone needs to bring all these
interests together for the grassroots effort that will be necessary to treat this social
malady.The city councils of eastern Washington County can be the catalyst for that
grassroots effort and the task force recommended here can be the way to get started.
The City of Tigard Homeless Task Force urges the City Council to continue to show the
leadership you have already exhibited in this area, to accept this report, to adopt its findings
and recommendations, and to facilitate an ongoing campaign among all the communities of
eastern Washington County to help homeless people escape poverty and regain
self-sufficiency.
t
ONION
21
F
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
AGENDA ITEM #
TO: Rill Monahan FOR AGENDA OF ..11 9~;A1 cf y
FROM: Carol A. Landsman
DATE: October 17, 1994
SUBJECT: Region 2040 Update
The Metro Council will act on the Region 2040 Recommended Growth Alternative on December 8, 1994.
Metro staff has submitted a set of RUGGO (Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives)
amendments outlining a growth management plan for the region and a concept map that embodies
general principles. This plan delineates proposed urban growth boundary area expansion and outlines
urban form within the boundary.
While the decision made in December will not directly affect Tigard, it will set into motion a process
that will ultimately lead to mandated changes in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. It is important that
the Tigard City Council review this plan and comment.
The Plan
he recommended alternative would add a modest amount of land outside the urban growth boundary
and accommodate growth inside the present urban growth boundary by using land more efficiently and
utilizing smaller average lot sizes. This plan would accommodate 720,000 additional residents and
350,000 additional jobs. Metro staff highlights the following plan concepts in the Recommended
Alternative Decision Kit.
® The urban growth boundary (UGB) would be expanded by 14,500 acres
during the 50-year period. Lands subject to future UGB expansion would
be designated as urban reserves until the UGB expansion is warranted.
• The average lot size for new single-family homes regionwide would be 6,650
square feet, or 6.5 units per net acre.
o The ratio of single-family and multi-family in new development would be
62 percent to 38 percent (The current ratio is 70 percent single-family, 30
percent multi-family.)
20 percent of the single-family market would be accommodated by
rowhouses, duplexes or small-lot development. This housing type would
mostly occur along transit corridors.
® The majority of housing would be in neighborhoods (52 percent), followed
by corridors and station communities (33 percent), and city, regional and
town centers (8 percent).
® About 19,300 acres of currently developed land in the urban area would
redevelop for- more intensive uses.
a Open space would represent 34,000 of the 245,500 acres in the expanded
UGR, or 14 percent of the urban land area.
® One-third of the buildable acres would allow wed uses and two-thirds
would remain in single-use categories such as residential or industrial.
The majority ofnew jobs (two-thirds) would be accommodated in centers or
along corridors and main streets, which would be well served by transit.
The industrial areas would provide land for about 10 percent of new jobs
and employment' areas would provide space for 14 percent of new jobs.
Significantly, residential neighborhoods account for 15 percent of total jobs
(this includes people working at home, child care, schools and small-scale
commercial within neighborhoods), up from 11 percent currently.
® Land extensive and heavily auto-dependent commercial or industrial uses
would be limited to employment areas and industrial areas rather that on
corridors, centers or neighborhoods.
How Would This Plan Affect Turd?
Two elements of the plan are particularly relevant to Tigard. The City Council will want to let Metro
Council ]mow if it disagrees with them.
1.) Washington Square area is designated as one of six regional centers. As
a regional center it would be the focus of compact development,
41 redevelopment and transit and highway improvements. Light rail would
serve the Washington Square area. Density would increase to up to 50
units per acre or about 100 employees per acre for commercial development.
The Metro report notes "Eventually these centers would grow to the density
of downtown Washington, about one-third of downtown Portland's density,
but three times denser than areas today."
2.) Downtown Tigard would receive a town center designation. Densities in
this area would increase to those comparable with Hawthorn Street in SE
Portland or those in downtown Hillsboro. "Town centers would provide
local shopping and employment opportunities within a local market area."
(Recommended Alternative Decision Kit).
Under this plan Tigard's population and employment would increase significantly.
YEAR POPULATION EMPLOYMENT
1992 31,350 29,440
2040 49,750 40,930
While not specific only to Tigard, this plan will increase the residential density of presently
undeveloped land. This will be accomplished through the use of apartments and townhouses, as well
s smaller lots for single detached housing. The recommended average lot size for Tigard would be
bout 5,300 sf. (Tigard's average lot size for houses built in the last 10 years is about 7,000 sQ
In their analysis, Metro staff have determined the region has a surplus of industrial land. While part
of this surplus may rest in the definition of industrial, this plan may call for use changes in vacant
land presently zoned industrial. This might affect Tigard's present inventory of 190 acres of vacant
industrial land.
l
Sam
s: ill This Plan Mandate Changes in the TiggEd Comprehensive Plan?
Tigard will not have to change its comprehensive plan in response to the Metro Council decision in
December. In fact, it is not yet clear how final this decision will be since there is pressure for a
preliminary decision. There may be room for modification as study continues. This decision, however,
will be the first step in a process that will require changes to the comprehensive plan. Over the next
two 'years, working cooperatively with the jurisdictions in the region, Metro will adopt fimetional plans
with which Tigard must conform. At that time, Tigard will be required to change its plan and then
its development code to conform with the comprehensive plan.
i
Issues
A 50 year growth plan for the entire region must, by definition, be a complex process based on a lot
of assumptions that may or may not prove true. Metro has conducted extensive analysis in the areas
of landuse, transportation, open space and infrastructure. At the October 19th Public Officials caucus
Washington County staff presented the comments of Washington County planning directors regarding
this plan. While the directors' recommendations generally supported the plan, they did identify
concerns with the plan itself (see attached). The directors also identified concerns with the process.
These included the recommendation that the Region 2040 Plan not be too specific to prevent further
analysis and that it be flexible to acknowledge diversity across the region.
One of the important factors in the 2040 process is the potential shift in how the region conducts
O1snning and zoning. To make this regional plan work, Metro would have more control over how we
zone Tigard. Metro mightrequire mandatory minimum densities throughout the City or specify certain
types of land use in certain areas. Metro staff promises a cooperative effort between itself and the
affected jurisdictions. This cooperative effort seems essential if this plan will work.
Another closely related issue is implementation; that is, how do we get from here to there? Region
2040 is, after 0, a 50 year plan. We must consider interim stages in the process, how successful they
are and how the array of decisions affects individual jurisdictions as well as the entire region. For
example, if growth is focused in one jurisdiction, but not another, how do we ensure equitable
distribution of resources?
Cost and efficiency certainly must be considered. Metro has yet to evaluate the Recommended
Alternative in light of its social costs. In this era of limited resources it is important to choose a cost
efficient and effective model of growth. For example, we must consider the trade-offs between types
of transportation improvements to determine net benefits generated.
Conclusion
Region 2040 is a complex process and plan based on extensive technical research. The decisions made
in the process will have a major impact on Tigard. Therefore, we must stay informed and involved.
The City Council will want to review and comment on the decision to designate Washington Square
regional center and downtown a town center.
a
hA108in\pattY\CC2M.mem
Odober 17, 1994
0 jlgljg~i llj;~!!; ailill ~ill 1 1 WN
ii eWY
EM El=-- Em
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
REGION' 2`040 -RECOMMENDED ALTER"NATIVE
WAdo%zj8INGTON Cur%UNTY u'LAM1INING D IRECTOR'S
REVIEW COMMENTS
OCTOBER 1311994
HINGTON COUNTY DEPT Q[ LAND USE & TRANSPORi/~ION
A~-rE~N~TOVE T
9040 COMMEN
WAARY OF
SUM Growth
ent w►th general
Executive
a ~eea~ in the
. ONE ~`a ~describea
concept ~Ura1
F(eG0mmendation e en urban a~'d
Ced O~ Continued
~distinCton bebN
supp ~~s►s p !a ource
e the emP
lands end 1 natural res lands
rotection of rural
Centers and reco~~'►Ze
p concept
agree with streng Bay in ~~e CarQMrth
. we role t~ey Pand employMent in
the important ousin9 transit
~ e Support the 511x ot vlaccessWlp to
.\N
cpmpaCt areas that are
a.ncom
III 1~ 1~ 01
SEEM
REGION 2040 ® RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE
U M M A RY 04" F G E IN' E arol"A L u u M M E N T S
® Adopt the Growth Concept Map by Resolution Order
9 Generalize the amount of land needed as Urban Reserves ,
® Add Additional Areas as Urban Reserve Study Areas
(Evergreen West & Reef Rend/Eisner Road areas) :
s3
Develop in Central/Eastern Washington County a4
transportation system and/or revised land use
pattern that assures future mobility and
a jobs/housing balance
® Develop Work Programs with realistic time frames for
- Urban Reserves
- Regional Transportation Plan Update
- Regional Framework Plan
- Future Vision
- Local Government Compliance Philosophy,
process timing
- Descriptive Indicators & Monitoring Program
- Infrastructure Cost/Efficiency Analysis
October 1g ®neom
IVE
S
OWIM
40 RRIECOMMEN
F(EGIO son OF GEN'',
SUMMP'RY
more targe$edl ,
ser~~s to the voncept
MOMy Rural Be ree~corridor
strat~g~c greenbelt)
,)2C) VAouseieio1d ~
on Dra~C 2()A 5 or
z
~ 1rsist up
ent orecaSts 0wj the edge
EMPIOYM revisit (growth ~ire~~nts
to and land use rea
~ Seek COMrOtment
and InduStfial 'a ppo~unotaes system
for ernpl°ymenonitor`ng •tment to establis Wk
4~
Seed Review at `~eg►o
and FreCo
quent
a.neemx mnm'fi~=Q
5
__1_1 MIMM
REGION 2040 ® RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE
Oil I R11 1"% A
A A tr 10"Y F L03" E No E [ i A L U U
M M E N T S
® Amend RUGGC's for Regional Centers indicatin
they will be diverse places each exhibiting their
own characteristics and responding to varying
markets and local needs
® Amend RUGGO's for Town Centers indicating that
each will have different characteristics and that
the Regional Framework Flan should reflect
this in establishment of Town Center guidelines
® Amend RU GO's for Corridors indicating that each
will have different characteristics and that the
- Regional Framework Flan should reflect this in
establishment of Corridor guidelines
® Amend RUGG®'s to indicate that Industrial Areas be
set aside for industrial uses and supportive
non-residential activities versus that they
be set aside exclusively for Industrial activities
October 1 oncom3
4
REGION 2040 - RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE
Sp"AUMMARY OF GENERAL COMMENTS
® Remove selected Corridors from the Concept Map
- Carden Hoene
Scholls Ferry between Washington Sq. and
Beaverton Hillsdale Highway
- Bethany Boulevard between Sunset Hwy West Union
- Boones Ferry Road south of Sagert Road
- Murray Boulevard south of Allen Blvd.
® Modify selected Corridors on the Concept Map
- Cornell Road: shift to new facility alignment
- Springville Road: shift to existing road alignment
Barnes Road: shift to new facility alignment
® Remove selected plain Streets from the Concept Map
- Cornell Road between 143rd and Barnes Read
between Cornelius Pass Road and & Stucki Avenue
- Farmington Road west of Murray Boulevard -
® Add new Corridors Main Streets based on additional analysis
Octobor 1 anc=4
:111111 BID!
lig
t .
JOIN N!
NI
Ij
s A
Metro Region 2040 Update Fall 1994
_V 7'
_Th eC `in d d
Ai ive
YOLJ_ L
Saj*d It
wo years ago, we began Region
2040 by asking very basic,
' "These are tough issues
general questions about how our region
fee SIO Makin
R 9 9 because people like to have
< ; sP ASSN' should grow. We wanted to know
R~ vu people's regional values -which their space I know B d®."
b
elements of our community should be
% protected and which things needed
improving. We learned that, in general, community leaders, a video, speaking
Whe ® Me people tended to value most highly a engagements and open houses - we
rr9 ere? asked to tell us how the felt
% I clean and accessible natural environ-
ment, people freedom from excessive traffic about those four specific issues. Those
congestion and quiet, safe neighbor- questions asked people how they felt
hoods. about:
Th Future ra
As the Region 2040 program pro- ® increasing development along
r
gressed, so did the types of questions transit lines
rn we asked the public. We moved from redeveloping city centers
S u€iehts Focus
the general to the more specific.
rg'thef 0ture i decreasing the average size of new
f~ Earlier this summer, we narrowed the residential lots
focus to four questions that identified ° reducing the number of commer-
possible ways to use land more effi- cial parking spaces.
(fF~k79l19'. ciently inside the urban growth bound-
Public Involveme t_. + ary, in order to keep those elements
bfl4`3 = people said they valued the most. What•you told us
Through.an intense public involvement
effort - including the use of a direct More than 17,000 people responded' to
mail piece and questionnaire sent to the questionnaire, and the response was
J more than 500,000 households a
" ~ almost evenly distributed across the
telephone hotline number, a youth region. We also received about 300
1 S- involvement program, interviews with
continued on page 2
y
Region 2040 - Fall 1994 1
t
i ,
i
You said. at
contin:[ed from page 1 `01 think smaller lot sizes can make perfect sense, but only
if
METRO letters from people who wrote elo- there are neighborhood
quently and thoughtfully about their parks or ~reensaees.
ideas for their region's future. About
Executive Officer 600 people attended eight open houses
Rena Cusma
around the region, nearly 4,000 people tended to reflect concerns similar to
Aletro Councilors checked out a free copy of a Region those of the general public.
District 1 Susan McLain 2040 video from area Blockbuster
District 2 Jon Kvistad
Video 3 Jim Gardner stores and libraries, and 600 In our summer public involvement
District 4 Richard Devlin students participated in a youth in- effort, we asked for a rating of 1 to 5 on.
District 5 Mike Gates volvement program. The response was the questions, ranging from strongly
District 6 George Van Bergen overwhelming, exceeding our highest agree to strongly disagree. For many
District 7 Ruth McFarland
District 8 Judy Wyers, expectations. people, however, a simple numbered
presiding officer rating did not say it all. Some sent
District 9 Rod Monroe All responses have been categorized, maps, letters, articles and comments
District 10 Roger Buchanan counted and analyzed, and are being with their questionnaires. Many of
District 11 Ed Washington,
deputy presiding forwarded to the Metro Council. these comments are included in this
officer Additional public input this fall also update. They drew on personal stories
District 12 Sandi Hansen will be sent directly to the elected or technical solutions to offer their
District 13 Terry Moore
councilors. Summaries of the public suggestions. Here is a summary of what
To talk with your elected councilor involvement report are available at you said:
about Region 2040 call 797-1540 Metro, 600 NE Grand Ave., Portland,
Metro is the directly elected regional or by calling 797-1888.
government that serves more than Should we increase development along
1 million residents in Clackamas, In examining the responses, we found transit lines?
Multnomah and Washington counties that people tended to support more
and the 24 cities that make up the compact, transit-oriented development People enthusiastically endorsed the
Portland metropolitan area.
so that farm and forest lands could be idea of increasing development along
Metro is responsible for solid waste preserved. The responses of 45 stake- transit lines - 83 percent agreed, while
management; operation of the Metro holders, including such diverse interest only 9 percent disagreed. One of the
Washington Park Zoo; transportation
and land-use planning; managing groups as home builder associations, most frequently noted reasons for
and planning regional parks and environmental organizations, and supporting this was the potential
greenspaces; and technical services public school and housing officials, also increased use of mass transit.
to local governments. Through the
Metropolitan Exposition-Recreation
Commission, Metro manages the • • . e - - • e e •
Oregon Convention Center, Civic
Stadium, the Portland Center for
12,000 64%
the Performing Arts and the Expo
Center. Cc 10,000
v
Metro is governed by a 13-member 0 : 8,000
council and an executive officer. 6,000
Councilors are elected within sub- o
districts; the executive officer is 4,000 19%
elected regionwide., E
Z 2,000 8% 3% 6%
~
For more information about Metro 0
or to schedule a speaker for a 1 2 3 4 5
community group, call 797-1510.
Agree Disagree
2 Region 2040 - Fall 1994
go 5a. 1
Although some people worried about
having homes near transit lines, most
favored having shops, homes and
Students JL 0_,~_Cus
transit near one another. One citizen
0
wrote, "I do not have a car and live in
an area where I can walk to most ' . "n th r ,tur%.,
essential services, and have three
frequently running bus lines close by - _
it's great and should be a model for nderwater tides and space
{ uf^
future development." shuttles may not be included
as part of the recommended
Many people were adamant, however, alternative, but those were a couple
that while they liked the idea of of the ideas that students had for
concentrating development along how the region should grow. This
transit lines, they did not want strip spring, 25 elementary, middle and
malls or endless blocks of retail devel- high schools brought Region 2040 ' r
opment. Instead, many suggested that questions to the classrooms as part
shops and homes be clustered around of Metro's youth involvements
MAX stations or centrally located bus program. More than 600 students
stops to form more aesthetically offered their thoughts on what their
pleasing and pedestrian-friendly neighborhood might look like in 50
centers. years, expressing their ideas Many of the essays and letters
through essays, poetry, plays, rap focused on what we could do to
Many raised the concern of preserving music, maps, models, drawings and keep those fears from being realized.
the character of their neighborhood in diaries. The ideas were varied and sincere,
Othe face of increased development ranging from technological solu-
along transit lines. Few people wanted
lions to simply being nicer to one
to see their own neighborhood change "l want my neighborhood another. One heartening theme
drastically, which suggests that we in the year 2040 to look united them - the need to think now
should focus development around like a park. My park would about what the region will look like
transit lines that already exist or are have a rainbow there." tomorrow. As one student wrote,
currently in the planning stage. "There's millions of questions that
need answers. We must not sit
around and ignore them."
Should we redevelop city centers? For some, the possibilites were
fanciful. One student wanted to live
Redevelopment of city centers also was in a high-rise apartment with
a popular idea. Many people felt that redwood treetops just outside her
redeveloping rundown buildings could window. Another would have a "The year is 2040. The land
enhance the value of an area and that neighborhood with no crime. is dry and dead. The hills
vibrant downtowns would make cities Others imagined commuter space were once forests. The
safer and shopping easier. A common shuttles, parks on top of buildings, dumps were once parks for
suggestion was to remodel old build- and automated farms. Some, kids to play in. The
ings, rather than build new ones, thus however, took the opportunity to waterwastes were once
preserving communities' sense of express their fears that pollution, ponds, oceans, seas,
history and charm. pavement and traffic would prevail lakes and pools."
while trees, farms and quiet neigh-
borhoods would vanish.
continued on page 4
Region 2040 - Fall 1994 3
F
k
JYou said i#
continued from page 3
"(I'm) tired of seeing new
12,000 houses built while old
56°x6 neighborhoods are
10,000 falling apart.
8,000
6,000
O
4,000 21 °h
n Should we decrease average new
E 11%
Z 2,000 4% 7% residential lot size?
0
1 2 3 4 5 About 58 percent, a slight majority, of
Agree Disagree the people who responded said they
supported the idea of reducing the size
of new residential lots. Opposition to
this idea, however, was fairly high at
• • - o . • - a 32 percent. No other proposed action
received that high a percentage of
12,000 opposition, suggesting that we must
10,000 provide a variety of different housing
,13 options so that people can have choices.
a 8,000 41%
6,000 A key concern among people who
23% responded on this issue was the need to
4,000 17%
E ° have play and recreational space for
Z 2,000 9% 9%
their children and pets. Some of the
o solutions people offered included
1 2 3 4 5 making the houses smaller so that yards
Agree Disagree could be bigger or creating more small
neighborhood parks within easy
walking distance. Fears of increasing
- • - • o e • . • crime and tension among neighbors
were two primary reasons people
12,000 opposed reducing average new lot sizes.
Others, however, felt that a more
10,000 compact neighborhood would increase
a 8,000 efficiency for police and fire service.
cc 6,000 34%
o People also indicated that it was
4,000 21%
160 18%
important to have affordable housing,
z 2,000 11 a distinct neighborhood character and
-r p the option to own rather than rent
1 2 3 4 5 apartments and condominiums.
Agree Disagree
continued on page IS
- Fall 1994
Region 2040
p- lial
211 Ili 11115
Afi-d:hmative
Recuo
-,k=end-,%d P
0 reserving our quality of life
N
e, egion 2040's "recommended
alternative" is how we describe
the end result of more than two years
of working on Region 2040. The
recommended alternative is the Metro
executive officer's recommendation
about how and where the region should Residential
grow. This fall, the Metro Council will neighborhoods
closely examine the recommended continue to
alternative, listen to final public input he a key
and make a growth policy decision by part of the
recommended
the end of the year. alternative.
We derived the recommended alterna- is expected to receive about 275,000 Rural reserves protect open space
tive through two means: from com- additional people, while the neighbor-
ments we've heard from the public and ing cities are forecast to receive Although there are substantial areas
from the technical analysis of the 40,000. Rural areas of the three Ore- both within and around the urban area
growth concepts created earlier in the gon counties are forecast to grow by that are undeveloped, they are not
Region 2040 process. 18,000 people. likely to remain so without some effort
to protect them. The recommended
The basic philosophy we've heard from alternative proposes creating more
the public and have used to build the Using compact development to reduce permanent public and private open
recommended alternative is: preserve land consumption spaces.
our access to nature and help build
better communities. In general, people Compact development is important to We refer to lands designated as perma-
consistently have expressed concern many people because it helps preserve nently rural as "rural reserves." They
about open space, transportation farm and forest land outside the urban are areas outside the present urban
mobility for people and goods, a strong growth boundary. The more efficient growth boundary and along highways
sense of community and a sustainable we are in using land inside the urban that connect the region to neighboring
economy. By addressing these funda- growth boundary, the less rural land cities. They will not be developed in
mental concerns, the recommended outside the boundary we have to the foreseeable future.
alternative can help guide growth so convert to urban uses. The recom-
that our region remains a wonderful mended alternative calls for more These rural reserves would support and
place to live. compact development in city centers protect farm and forestry operations.
and good quality transit service. It The reserves also would include some
includes substantial development in purchase of natural areas adjacent to
Where is everyone going? downtown Portland, regional centers, rivers, streams and lakes to make sure
town centers and transportation the water quality is protected and
Our forecast of 1.1 million additional corridors where transit service cur- wildlife habitat enhanced. Large natural
people is for the four-county area rently exists or is beir_g planned. features, such as hills and buttes, also
(Multnomah, Clackamas, Washington would be included as rural reserves
and Clark counties), with about two- because they buffer developed areas
thirds, or 720,000, of them locating and are poor candidates for compact
within Metro's boundary. Clark County - continued on page 6
Region 2040 - Fall 1994 5
221111 EVIQ11111
Glossary o terms Recommended
continued from page S
Main streets - Neighborhood Rural reserves - Areas that are a
shopping areas along a main street or combination of public and private urban development. Existing rural
at an intersection, sometimes having a lands outside the urban growth residential developments and lots
unique character that draws people boundary, used primarily for farms and would remain as they are.
from outside the area. forestry. They are protected from
development by very low-density
Inner neighborhoods - Areas in zoning and serve as buffers between Rural reserves are designated in areas
Portland and the older suburbs that are urban centers. that are most threatened by new
primarily residential, close to employ- - development, that separate communi-
ment and shopping areas, and have Town centers - Areas o, mixed
slightly smaller lot sizes and higher residential and commercial use that ties (such as the land between Gresham
population densities than in outer serve tens of thousands of people. and Sandy or between Oregon City and
neighborhoods. Canby), or exist as special resource
Transportation corridors - Residen- areas (such as the Columbia Gorge,
Outer neighborhoods - Areas in the tial and retail development concen-
outlying suburbs that are primarily trated along major arterials and bus Sauvie Island or the Tualatin Valley).
residential, farther from employment lines.
and shopping areas, and have slightly The primary means of achieving rural
larger lot sizes and lower population Urban growth boundary (UGB) - A reserves would be through voluntary
densities than inner neighborhoods. line around the metropolitan region
that indicates land that already is or agreements among Metro, the counties,
Neighboring cities - Cities that are can be developed at urban densities. neighboring cities and the state. These
outside Metro's jurisdiction but will be Metro controls the urban growth agreements would prohibit extending
affected by the growth policies adopted boundary and is responsible for urban growth into the rural reserves
by the Metro Council. deciding whether to make expansions
to the boundary. and require that state agency actions
Neighborhood centers - Retail and are consistent with the rural reserve
service development that surrounds Urban reserves - Land outside the designation.
major MAX stations and other major present urban growth boundary that
intersections, extending out for one- later could be included inside the
quarter to one-half mile. boundary to accommodate future
growth. Open spaces inside the present UGB
Recommended alternative - The
Metro executive officer's recommenda- High capacity transit - Transit routes
lion for long-term growth manage- that may be either a road designated Areas inside the present urban growth
ment of our region, including sugges- for frequent bus service or for a light- boundary also would be set aside as
lions for where and how much the rail line.
urban growth boundary should be permanent open space, ensuring
expanded, what densities should Open space - Publicly and privately substantial natural area opportunities
characterize different areas, and which owned areas of land, including parks, for people, protection of water quality
areas should be protected as open natural areas and areas of very low and connections to nature and the
space. density development inside the urban environment. Some of these open
growth boundary.
Regional centers - Areas of mixed spaces would be vistas of trees or
residential and commercial use that natural countryside with limited access.
serve hundreds of thousands of people Other open spaces would be publicly
and are easily accessible by different
types of transit. As identified in the owned and much more accessible to
recommended alternative, there are six those who seek a respite from the urban
regional centers: Gresham, Beaverton, landscape.
Washington Square, Hillsboro,
Milwaukie and Clackamas Town
Center. About 35,000 acres of land and water
inside today's urban growth boundary
are included as open spaces in the
recommended alternative. We could
achieve these open spaces by a combi-
continued on page 10 ,qr~s
6 Region 2040 - Fall 1994
- SIZES,
s
" ow will the Region 2040 decision
be made? <1
The 13 members of the elected Metro
Council will consider a recommenda-
tion made by Metro's executive officer.
The final decision-making phase, which
will include considerable public input,
will occur this fall. The council will
adopt a 50-year growth management
policy by December 1994. This policy
will be an amendment to the Regional
Urban Growth Goals and Objectives Both citizens and technical advisors have helped to shape the recommended alternative.
that were adopted in 1991.
How will the decision about the Write to the Metro Council,
The decision phase will include recommended alternative affect me? Region 2040 - Recommended
extensive review by the council Plan- Alternative, 600 NE Grand Ave.,
ning Committee, recommendations The adoption of a Region 2040 growth Portland, OR 97232, attn. Gail
from various regional advisory commit- management policy will guide future Ryder.
tees, and a series of hearings devoted regional decisions about the urban o Contact your local government
exclusively to public testimony. Finally, growth boundary, land-use patterns and officials. They are our partners in
the Metro Council will use the volume transportation systems. Once the this process. Let them know what
of public testimony, previous public Region 2040 growth policy is adopted, you think.
input, technical information, and Metro will begin working with local
recommendations from committees and governments, citizens, businesses and ° Fax your comments to us at 797-
local governments to adopt the region's interest groups to develop a specific 1796. All materials should be
50-year growth management policy. regional framework plan. labeled Region 2040 - Recom-
mended Alternative.
A schedule of public meetings for the How can I get my ideas across? • Call our Region 2040 hotline at
council Planning Committee and the 797-1888 to request information or
full Metro Council is on the back cover. You still have opportunities to com- leave a comment.
ment on the recommended alternative
now and on the final changes it will
How can I get more information about undergo as it becomes the region's What's the deadline for comments?
the recommended alternative? growth management policy for the next
50 years. Here are the ways that you The sooner the better. The final date
A summary and map of the recom- can participate in the decision: for written comments to the Metro
mended alternative are included in this Council is Nov. 28. The council is
Region 2040 Update. If you would like Attend or speak at public hearings, scheduled to make the final decision on
more detailed technical information, advisory committee meetings and Dec. 8, 1994.
call our Region 2040 hotline at 797- council work sessions.
1888 and ask for our "Region 2040 Thank you for taking the time to
Decision Kit." participate. We guarantee it will make a
difference.
Region 2040 - Fall 1994 7
9' S
5: q
~ ~ T
i
YQ F 4.
V" r ~ A ~ C
~ '
~ ~ 111 e ~
ear
.3 cf
.F ~ + P O - ii Yj t
y
fV
l o - ~
~M
p ~ u`
1
a S 0 a L,
~ ~}.i
~ u @ ~ ~ k f fra?
~
~,a
s ~ a
kj~ ~ °t
t~ IK
3V• ?
Y e
~ a
e
o (~~j,
Q U - ~ ~q x.] ~ ~ w ~G ~u F'y$
o ~ ~
i
° ~
~ ~ ~ $
s 5 r - ~ - ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
-:r
r
_ ` ,
~O
y'E",
wh:!r?L,
%1''-'::kj 1
l i
)
~.N,~
}f
V, 7'
REG10N
Clark County
Urban Growth Area
Decisions for Tomorrow
3x j
_ b v
Executive Officer Recommendation
° --t_ 2040 Growth Concept
pp~~r M[TRO
•ry ~ _ _ o
ti
W
IA-Y
B
.a
,o»n. ■
d -
1 ~
V
rw
o
I C
fi•
~ A A ~
011
Recommended Regional centers are on the move center with compact development and
continued f -oni page 6 transit service. They would provide
The recommended alternative proposes local shopping and employment
six regional centers (existing areas that opportunities to a surrounding market
nation of ways. Some areas could be, serve hundreds of thousands of people): area of about 2.5 miles. Examples
purchased by public entities, such as downtown Gresham, downtown include the downtowns of Lake Os-
Metro's Greenspaces program and local Beaverton, Washington Square, wego, Tigard and Oregon City. The
park departments. Others may be Clackamas Town Center, downtown 1990 density of an average of 23 people
donated by private citizens or by Milwaukie and downtown Hillsboro. per acre would nearly double - to about
developers of adjacent properties to These centers would become the focus the current densities of development
reduce the impact of development. Still of compact development, redevelop- along Hawthorne Boulevard and in
others could be protected by very low- ment, and transit and highway im- downtown Hillsboro.
density residential zoning, clustering provements. From the current 24
housing on portions of the land while people per acre, the recommended
leaving important features as common alternative would allow up to 60 people Corridors also make use of transit
open space. per acre. To achieve this, new commer-
cial developments would average about Corridors are not as dense as centers
100 employees per acre, and housing but are located along good quality
Central city as the focus for density would average about 50 dwelling units transit lines. An example of a present-
and transit per acre. day corridor is McLoughlin Boulevard.
Some corridors are laid out in a linear
Let's look at how the recommended design, while others are laid out in a
alternative would accommodate more "I am adamantly against more circular pattern. Each provides a
compact development. First, it pro- building additional freeways; place for densities that are somewhat
poses encouraging substantial develop- they only further dissect higher than today and are convenient
ment and redevelopment of downtown communities and develop an to transit. Corridors would grow from
Portland as the region's city center. even greater dependency on 1990 densities of 18 people per acre to
This supports the region's primary the automobile. It is critical to as many as 24 per acre. Development
existing center - with its investments, provide alternatives that would average 13 dwelling units per
services and sense of community - and encourage less reliance on acre of 28 employees per acre - densi-
helps minimize the impact of higher the automobile." ties typical of rowhouses, duplexes and
density in other areas. most office buildings today.
Under the recommended alternative, Transit improvements would include
downtown Portland would keep pace light-rail and bus service to all regional Main streets make a comeback
with the rest of the region in employ- centers. Highway improvements also
ment growth. It would row at the would focus on ensuring that these
g During the early decades of this
same rate as the rest of the region and centers are attractive places to conduct century, main streets that were served
would remain the location of 20 business. Eventually, these centers . by transit and characterized by a strong
percent of regional employment. To do would grow to the density of downtown business and civic community, were a
this, downtown Portland's 1990 density Salem or Corvallis - about one-third of major land-use pattern throughout the
of 150 people per acre would increase downtown Portland's density, but three region. Examples remain in Hillsboro,
to 250 people per acre. Improvements times more dense than today. Milwaukie, Oregon City and Gresham,
to the transit system network would as well as the Westmoreland neighbor-
provide additional, mobility to and from hood and along Hawthorne Boulevard.
the city center. Town centers fill local needs Today, these areas are undergoing a
revival and provide an efficient and
Smaller than regional centers and effective land-use and transportation
serving tens of thousands of people,
town centers are the third type of
continued on page 12
10 Region 2040 - Fall 1994
Where We Go From Here?
nce the Metro Council adopts a The Regional Framework Plan will Council is scheduled to approve the
® regional growth policy and address elements such as: the Regional workplan in December as part of the
Region 2040 is then completed, what Transportation Plan, urban reserves Region 2040 decision.
happens next? Where do we go from that will be used for future growth,
here? rural reserves that will allow neighbor- Local governments also will be
ing cities to remain separate and involved in helping develop the
Planning for the region's future distinct from the metropolitan area, workplan, primarily through represen-
requires constant revising and refining development of centers and corridors, tatives on the Metropolitan Policy
to meet the changing needs of the water resource management, and parks Advisory Committee. The committee
communities it serves. The growth and open space. will make a recommendation to the
management policy presented in the Metro Council about the proposed
recommended alternative represents The framework plan also will be used workplan.
an important part - but by no means and updated in conjunction with other
the only part - of a multi-faceted Metro-related planning programs, Once the Metro Council adopts the
regional growth management effort. including the work being done now by Regional Framework Plan, and it is.
the Future Vision Commission. (See approved by the state, the plan will
The next step in Metro's planning article on Future Vision Commission.) be binding upon local governments.
program is to adopt the Future Vision The Regional Framework Plan will be
by July 1995. While that's being updated periodically, and the Future Metro's work on the Regional Frame-
completed, we will begin implement- Vision work must be updated at least work Plan, as in the Region 2040
ing Region 2040. We will do that by every 15 years. By systematically process, will be done in conjunction
developing the Regional Framework updating these two important planning with the advice and input of local
Plan, the charter-mandated plan that programs, the region will have the governments, businesses, citizens, and
the Metro Council must adopt by Dec. value of guidelines that reflect current important advisory groups. As always,
31, 1997. The framework plan will needs. we will keep you informed of our
outline the specifics about how the progress and involve you in key
region and local communities will Metro Planning Department staff now decisions.
implement the Region 2040 growth is developing a draft workplan for the
policy. Regional Framework Plan. The Metro
1994 1995 1996
August " July July
• ® e
CNI
IBM=
Region 2040 - Fall 1994 71
SRI li MUM
T
Portland shipping facilites. From 1990
r>-
Recommended
"We need to preserve our densities of 8.6 employees per acre,
continued from page 10 -
urban forests and streams to the recommended alternative would
alternative. The recommended alterna- preserve our sanity/, what include 8.9 employees per acre - more
tive calls for main streets to grow from wildlife we have left and our dense than today, but still providing
1990 levels of 36 people per acre to 39 Water quality." substantial space devoted exclusively to
industrial use.
per acre.
Other employment centers would be
In contrast, new areas in the outer designated as mixed-use, combining
Neighborhoods serve a key function neighborhoods would be farther away various types of employment and
from large employment centers and including some residential develop-
Residential neighborhoods would would have larger lot sizes (7,560 ment. Densities would rise substantially
remain a key component of the recom- square feet) and lower densities. from 1990 levels of about 11 people per
mended alternative but would not Examples include outer suburbs such as
acre to 20 people per acre. Its impor-
include high-rise buildings - a common Forest Grove, Sherwood and Oregon tant to industrial uses and employment
fear expressed by people throughout City, and any additions to the urban centers, however, that goods to and
our public involvement efforts. Neigh- growth boundary. From 1990 levels from these areas can be transported
borhoods would fall into two basic of nearly 10 people per acre, outer easily.
categories. Inner neighborhoods are neighborhoods would increase to 13
found in Portland and the older per acre.
suburbs of Beaverton, Milwaukie and
and would include Minimal urban reserves would be
Lake Oswego,
residential areas that are added
primarily Employment areas would be protected
accessible to employment. Average new
lot sizes would be smaller 5,720 square One important feature of the recom-
( The recommended alternative plays a mended alternative is that it would
feet) to accommodate densities increas- major role in strengthening the re- accommodate all 50 years of forecasted
ing from 1990 levels of about 11 people gional economy, primarily through growth through a relatively small
per acre to about 14 per acre. Inner protecting key industrial and employ- amount of urban reserves. Urban
neighborhoods would trade smaller ment areas. These areas would be set reserves consist of land set aside outside
lot sizes for better access to jobs and aside exclusively for industrial activities. the present urban growth boundary for
shopping. Most of the employment They include land-intensive employers, future growth. The recommended
would be neighborhood- based such such as those around the Portland r
as schools, childcare and some small alternative calls for urban reserves o'
International Airport, some areas along about 15,000 acres - substantially less
businesses. Highway 212/224, and along Port of
. than in growth concepts studied earlier
in the Region 2040 process. In addi-
tion, only 22 percent of this land is
presently designated for exclusive use as
Employment Housing farm land, reflecting the public's desire
City center 22% 5%9 to use as little farm land as possible for
Regional 'enters 9 3 use as urban reserves.
Town centers 7 3
Corridors 19 33
Neighboring communities would grow
Main streets 3 2
Inner neighborhoods a 21 The recommended alternative also
Outer neighborhoods 7 17 recognizes that neighboring cities
Mixed-use employment centers 12 5 surrounding the region's metropolitan
Industrial areas 13 1 area are likely to grow rapidly. Com-
12 Region 2040 - Fall 1994
mmmgil
Em!
munities such as Sandy, Canby and
Newberg will be affected by the Metro
Council's decisions about managing the
region's growth. Up to 86,000 people
would be accommodated in these
neighboring cities, according to the
recommended alternative, which
recognizes that cooperation between
Metro and these communities is
r
necessary to address common transpor-
tation and land-use issues.
Designating land
as "rural reserve"
Transportation improvements designed is one way to
protect open space.
to fat land use
particularly to downtown Gresham, about this region. The recommended
The transportation system for the which would be a regional center. alternative is our best attempt to
recommended alternative has many include what we heard from you and
of the same elements as the growth The Western Bypass has only those what we have learned through technical
concepts analyzed earlier - but with segments included in the recommended analysis. We heard that you value
some significant differences. alternative that are within the urban nature and want it nearby. As a result,
growth boundary. Specifically, the link we included substantial rural reserves
First, the recommended alternative between I-5 and Highway 99 in the outside the urban growth boundary and
assumes that the Sunrise Corridor and Tualatin/Sherwood area would be open space inside the boundary so that
the Mt. Hood Parkway will be com- included, as are arterial system im- both our rural environment and urban
pleted in the next 50 years. The Sunrise provements that increase accessibility areas are green and natural. You
Corridor would become a new regional from Highway 26 to the Tualatin Valley indicated a strong preference for
highway from I-205 to the Damascus Highway in the Hillsboro area. In transit, and the recommended alterna-
area and would connect with Highway addition, improvements to Highway tive would create a region that height-
26. There are about 150 other road 217 would be included. The segment ens the sense of community and also
system improvements included in the that crosses the Tualatin Valley farm- makes transit, walking, and biking more
recommended alternative. land, however, would not be included. efficient and convenient. You indicated
that you expected increased density recom- The roadways indicated in the In our earlier Region 2040 analysis, we along corridors and in centers but
mended alternative map represent nt just found that several of the light-rail lines didn't want it in your neighborhoods.
a concept and does not show actual would not have enough riders to be To the extent possible, we designed the
alignment. Access points, or inter- cost effective. So we reduced the recommended alternative accordingly.
changes, would be placed to reinforce number of light-rail lines and changed
the proposed land uses. In the Sunrise some from exclusive light-rail to high- We believe this recommended plan,
Corridor, for example, there would be capacity transit. We added transit more although it cannot meet everyone's
an interchange providing access to judiciously in the recommended wish list, is instrumental in achieving
Damascus, which is designated as a alternative and kept transit service to a strong growth management policy.
town center, but there would be very less than 12,000 hours. Under the recommended alternative,
few additional interchanges. transit ridership is projected to qua-
qua-
druple - up to 570,000 riders a day -
The Mt. the Hood Parkway is shown I-low your ideas became the significantly more than any of the 2040
it
w present urban growth recommended alternative concepts. Walking, biking and transit
boundary and would link I-84 with combined would account for 13 percent
Highway 26. It, too, is designed to have When we started Region 2040 we
limited access to support land uses, began by asking what you valued most continued on page 16
Region 2040 - Fall 1994 13
fill
ININ
rt
Fut-liare Vision Will Guide Region
measured. The Future Vision looks at
a nine-county* area in Oregon and
Washington and asks: "What do we
want to keep, change and add to the
area during the next 50 or more years?"
The F are 44 ` Metro's Region 2040 program - which
s on
address many of focuses on land-use and transportation
the issues facing tr planning through the year 2040 - is
the future of providing valuable information and
our region analysis that will be used by the Future
and our Vision Commission. The commision
children.
also is examining three technical papers
hat lies in store for this region - council in 1995. The council must on issues of vital importance to future
known for its tremendous adopt a vision by July 1, 1995. livability: the carrying capacity of our
livability and aesthetic beauty - is a natural and human resources, historic
matter of considerable interest and Commission members bring to their and potential settlement patterns that
discussion. Everyone wants to keep our task valuable perspectives and expertise show where people might live, and
future region livable. The dialogue in areas such as land development, changes and potential trends in the way
about how to do that continues to be finance, the arts, human services, the people work in the future. The charter
both lively and thought-provoking. role of neighborhoods, citizen involve- provides that the Regional Framework
ment, natural resources and transporta- Plan - an outline of specific regional
The mission of Metro's Future Vision tion. land-use elements - must address the
Commission is to devise a vision that Future Vision. This is of critical
will guide the metropolitan region into The Future Vision Commission was importance since the Regional Frame-
the next 50 years and beyond. It will created as a result of the voter-ap- work Plan will be binding upon local
shape a vision - resulting in specific proved 1992 Metro Charter, which governments.
actions - that serves as a guiding light states in part that:
for citizens, regional leaders, busi-
nesses, interest groups, and educators "The Future Vision is a conceptual How do I get involved in shaping the
who believe that, with hard work and statement that indicates population levels Future Vision?
forward-thinking, tomorrow can be and settlement patterns that the region can
even better than today. accommodate within the carrying capacity The Future Vision Commission
of the land, water and air resources of the
region, and its educational and economic meetings are open to the public, and
resources, and that achieves a desired public comment is encouraged. For
What is the Future Vision quality of life." meeting schedules or other informa-
Commission? tion, call 797-1562. Written materials
may be sent to commission members
The commission is an 18-member, How does the "vision" relate to Metro's c/o Metro Planning Department, 600
unpaid group whose members and other planning efforts? NE Grand Ave., Portland, OR 97232,
alternates were appointed in March or by fax at 797-1794.
1993 by the Metro Council, the The Future Vision is more general and
governors of Oregon and Washington, covers a broader geographical area than *All or parts of Cowlitz and Clark counties
and the Metropolitan Policy Advisory Metro's other planning efforts. It in Washington, and Clackamas, Columbia,
Committee. The commission will attempts to set goals and standards by Multnomah, Washington, Marion,
forward a recommended vision to the which other planning programs can be Yazvhill and Polk counties in Oregon.
14 Region 2040 - Fall 1994
in I gpll! 11
4 _
You said it concerns. All these have been tabulated but not surprised that the people of this
continued from page 4 by category, and some interesting region care so much about the place
responses were included. Some of the they call home.
most frequent suggestions included:
Should we reduce the number of As one citizen wrote, "1 think the core
parking spaces? ! preserve open space inside and question is what do we want the
outside the urban growth boundary character of the region to be? I am
Reducing the number of parking spaces slow or stop growth concerned that we're becoming a
showed a slight majority support (54 generic. urban sprawl community
percent), but many of those answers ° increase light rail and bus service without preserving enough of what
were qualified by people suggesting ® hold the urban growth boundary makes the area unique - green, trees,
that the reductions occur on a case-by- wildlife, arts and crafts, and friendly
case basis. Many people preferred create more bike ways neighborhoods."
multi-level parking structures that • revitalize city centers and neigh-
would reduce the land needed for borhoods, and restore rundown As we face the question of what we
parking lots without decreasing the buildings want the region to be, we also must ask
number of spaces. Others cautioned the more difficult question of how it
that mass transit should be a viable way The number of people who responded, can be accomplished. Public involve-
to reach the businesses affected by a and the thoughtfulness they exhibited ment has been a valuable tool in
reduction of parking spaces. in answering the questions and express- shaping the decisions so far, and we
ing their opinions, was both over- strongly encourage you to stay involved
whelming and encouraging. Given the as our future region takes shape.
Other concerns competition in today's world to get and
hold people's attention -especially
For 10,000 of our respondents, simply about ideas to shape the community for
D circling numbers wasn't enough. They the next 50 years - we are heartened
wrote in comments, suggestions and
I
I
ant to hear. We always value your input, and hope you stay involved. Unless you note
We w
I otherwise, we will continue to send you updates on growth management issues
fP0 Y and ask for your opinion.
Give us your comments on the 0 Please remove my name from your mailing list. I do not want to continue
recommended alternative. receiving your mailings.
Send to: 0 Please add me to your mailing list. I
I I
Region 2040
I Planning Department Name
Metro Street address
600 NE Grand Ave.
Portland, OR 97232-3726. City ZIP code I
i
1
I R, E G 10 N My comments on the recommended alternative:
I
( ~ecArioazs fcr Tonim~rrw I
- --.--1
j Region 2040 - Fall 1994 15
:10 11110; isIIIIIIiIII
IM 5
P
Recommended
continued from page 13 We want to hear from. you
of all trips in 2040, and in some areas as
high as 25 to 50 percent. There would ~j3~OPt1iP1~ f99~@t9C9gS
be open spaces close to nearly every
neighborhood. There still would be Planning, Committee Wednesday, Oct. 26
f room for industrial b public meeting scbedule 6:30-9:30 p.m.
plenty o 1o Gresham City Hall
growth, with commercial areas being Tuesday, Oct. 18 13 TNW Eastman Parkway, Gresham
used more intensely and functioning 6:30-9:30 p.m.
better. Growth would be accommo- Oregon Institute of Technology Otber important dates
dated as inexpensively as possible. Our Conference Center
analysis shows that while it is not 7726 SE Harmony Rd., Portland
Monday, Nov 28
perfect, it is the best future scenario we Wednesday, Oct. 19 Deadline for submission
have studied. 6:30-9:30 p.m. of written testimony. Mail to:
Westminster Presbyterian Church Metro Council
While this proposed plan is nearing Great Hall Region 2040 - Recommended Alternative
1624 NE Hancock, Portland 600 NE Grand Ave.
completion and is headed for a policy Portland, OR 97232
discussion and decision, it is very Thursday, Oct. 20 attn.: Gail Ryder
important that you still react to it. How 6:30-9:30 p.m. Fax: 797-1793 -
Hillsboro High School
does this sit with your ideas about how District Office Board Room Monday, Nov 28
the region should grow? Does this 759 SE Washington, Hillsboro 4 p.m. -
describe a place where you would like Special Metro Council public
to live? Even more importantly, is this Tuesday, Oct. 25 hearing on Planning Committee's
6:30-9:30 p.m. recommended alternarive
the place you want to leave for the next Western Portland General Electric
generation? Let us know how you Auditorium Thursday, Dec. 8
would improve the recommended 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd., 4 p.m.
alternative. Use the reply card in the Beaverton Regular Metro Council meeting,'
- formal adoption of recommended
inside back cover to send us your alternative.
comments, call your Metro councilor, or
call the Region 2040 hotline, 797-1888.
Printed on SO pcrrent re yeled paper, 10 percent post-consturer waste 94341SG
i, Bulk Rate
U.S. Postage
M ETRO I AI®
Permit # 6018
600 NE Grand Ave. Portland OR
Portland, OR 97232-2736
ADDRESS CORRECTION REQUESTED
~ sob ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ A \
*Kiim
~ l ~ I~arar, f r xrntaorv~
. Recommended ternative
e"' si
'r
Septeinber 1994
:
:Q;: I
70
ETR
i
1
•
~ , C: I r
i
, n~
METRO
To the Metro Council:
he 2040 growth concept that I am recommending is While this is a very big and very long-range decision, it
an historic first in several important ways. It aceom- allows for future flexibility. No one can say how long it will
modates a 70 percent population increase with an addition of actually take to grow to 2.4 million people. Part of the
only 7 percent to our urban land supply. Second, it integrates answer will depend on how well we succeed in the develop-
land use, transportation and greenspaces more closely than ment this growth concept proposes for land use, transporta-
ever done anywhere. Third, and most important, this is P. tion design and community building. The growth concept
REGIONAL decision. It was developed along with almost identifies 22,000 acres from which we need to select 14,500
every government in the region and with the input of acres of urban reserves. The specifics are not yet drawn in
thousands of citizens - more than have ever been involved in the 2040 growth concept. That task awaits more detailed
any planning effom work by staff and local governments, public hearings and
decisions by a new Metro Council.
This decision will have the most far-reaching effects of any
decision to come before this government since its inception Through a collaborative regional process, most of the final
16 years ago. And yet it is a relatively easy one because it differences can be worked out, but there will still be some
builds upon the success of the Oregon land-use experience people with very legitimate concerns about the effects of
and the experience of this region. It is also easy because the growth. There is no question in my mind that growth
2040 process, in its effort to find a consensus, has reached inevitably reduces some aspects of our quality of life. I am
out to and involved all regional interests. Certainly not every equally convinced that as long as this is an attractive region
person will be happy with every aspect of this growth with jobs, security and a much better than average environ-
INS but we can all live with it and understand both its went, our present residents will stay and newcomers will
rationale and the consequences of not coming together on a continue to be attracted. We should continue to be con-
common approach. cerned about how growth affects our overall quality of life.
We should not attempt to fax an absolute number beyond
This recommended alternative includes much of what we which we would eject our own or reject the next newcomer.
heard from the public - hold the urban growth boundary, Oregon's land-use tradition calls upon us to accommodate
establish rural reserves, encourage development close to growth where it is designated and to preserve the rest. This
transit, retain and acquire open spaces, and encourage 2040 growth concept is in that tradition.
alternative transportation options.
Let us move forward to develop implementation of this set
The 2040 growth concept puts a premium on our precious of policy directions. No set of initiatives as ambitious as this
land supply. While allocating 34,000 acres for natural and can be accomplished by any one government. A truly
open space within the urban growth boundary„ it proposes regional agenda must be moved by the region as a whole. I
the initiation of a new land designation of rural reserve to am confident this can happen because of the way this 2040
protect land that separates communities from each other. growth concept was developed. The Metropolitan Policy
Rural reserves would keep 300,000 acres in farm, forest and Advisory Committee has been a vital partner in the process.
rural residential uses. Implementation of this new category Its chair, Mayor Gussie McRobert, has been especially
of land use will require the active cooperation of six counties helpful in obtaining consensus. The entire region owes
and the support of affected state agencies. Mayor McRobert and MPAC a debt of gratitude. We also
owe special thanks to John Fregonese, who led the staff
effort.
C
The package you are receiving includes a resolution for work plan. Adoption of the Future Vision and the other
adoption of the 2040 growth concept including maps, a elements mentioned will be a full plate for a new set of
description of the concept itself and appendices. Regional elected officials. Even though some elected officials will
Urban Growth Goals and Objectives (RUGGOs) amend- continue, new ones will have to get up to speed quickly to
ments are also included. These are necessary to bring the accomplish the tasks remaining. The region is ready, the
RUGGOs into compliance with the 1992 Metro Charter time is now!
and to incorporate the 2040 growth concept into the
RUGGOs. We are still analyzing input from citizens of the region. You,
the Metro Council, have scheduled hearings that will
These elements all depend upon a decision on the 2040 provide even more opportunities for citizens to provide
growth concept occurring in the next few months. This input on this proposal. I am confident that the 2040 growth
council is well informed about the issues and the process that concept embodies what most of our residents want for their
has brought this decision to the fore. It should adopt the future and that of their children and grandchildren. I know it i
2040 growth concept, amendments to the RUGGOs and the is what I want for my children and grandchildren.
Rena Cusma
Executive O)uer
Im un am us an
IN III IN
Metro Region 2040 Decision-waking Kit
Fall 9994
e
'r
Overview adoption by the Metro Council. This map and descriptions
of its components will become the basis for overall regional
his document describes the Recommended Alternative policy setting through the Regional Urban Growth Goals
for the Region 2040 project. For background infor- and Objectives (RUGGOs). The Analysis Map provides a
mation, please refer to Concepts for'Growth, dated June 1994. detailed picture of one way that the Recommended Alterna-
(This report assumes familiarity with the ideas and terminol- five could be implemented and allows for computer model-
ogy used in the June effort). The Recommended Alternative ing and technical analysis. Much of this report describes the
is the Metro Executive Officer's recommendation to the results of this modeling and technical analysis. The distinc-
Metro Council and its advisory committees, the Metro lion between the ideas represented in the two maps are
Policy Advisory Committee (MPAC), the Joint Policy worth calling out. The Concept map provides the basis for a
Advisory Committee on Transportation QPACT) and the decision which will embody general principles while the
Future Vision Commission. analysis map is only and example allowing a greater level of
detail.
The Recommended Alternative considers the technical a
findings documented in the Concepts fir Growth report as well In the course of integrating feedback from citizens, and local
as nearly 17,000 responses received from the It's Your Turn governments we changed some category names from those
survey mailer. The Recommended Alternative is Metro described in Concepts for Growth because of concerns ex-
staffs attempt to blend all this information into one "best" pressed and to more accurately reflect the meaning and
alternative. Its a common point to begin discussion of the intent of the terms. "Preferred Alternative" is replaced with
major issues confronting our region to be refined through "Recommended Alternative". "Rural Reserves" has been
the Regional Framework Plan and Future Vision. The substituted for "Greenbelts", and "Open Space" for
alternative will be discussed at public hearings and is likely to "Greenspaces", to avoid confusion with Metro's Greenspaces
change in response to public comments received. program. "Node" has been changed to "Station Communi-
ties". "Employment Area" has been divided into two catego-
The Recommended Alternative would allow the expansion ries, "Industrial Area" and "Employment Area", just as
of the urban growth boundary by 14,500 acres over 50 years. "Neighborhoods" have been divided into "Inner Neighbor
This is less expansion than other concepts, except Concept hoods" and "Outer Neighborhoods". (Explanations of these
B. It preserves substantial amounts of rural resource lands categories are included below).
that surround the metropolitan region. The Recommended
Alternative also would accommodate growth inside the
present urban growth boundary by using land more effi- Highlights of the analysis version
ciently and utilizing smaller average lot sizes. Higher
density would be encouraged where good quality transit The urban growth boundary (UGB) would be expanded
service is planned. Finally, 8 percent of new regional growth by 14,500 acres over the SO year period. Lands subject
would occur in neighboring cities, less than the 30 percent to future UGB expansion would be designated as Urban
assumed in Concept C. Reserves until the UGB expansion is warranted.
The average lot size for new single family homes region-
The Recommended Alternative is illustrated by two maps. wide would be 6,650 square feet, or 6.5 units per net
The Growth Concept Map is intended to be considered for acre
Region x - Decision-making Kit
gllielciwl~
• The ratio of single family and multi-family in new and the analysis of the Region 2040 project to guide growth
development would be 62 percent to 38 percent (rbe for the next 50 years. Key components of the Recommend
current ratio is 70 percent single family, 30 percent Alternative are described for land use and for transportation.
multi-family.)
• 20 percent of the single family market would be acgom-
modated by rowhouses, duplexes or small lot develop-
ment. Use This housing type would mostly occur along
transit corridors. The following are categories of land use as defined and used
in this Growth Concept.
• The majority of housing would be in neighborhoods (52
percent), followed by corridors and station communities
(33 percent), and city, regional and town centers (8 Neigbbor Cities:
percent).
• About 19,300 acres of currently developed land in the The Recommended Alternative recognizes that neighboring
urban area would redevelop for more intensive uses. cities surrounding the region's metropolitan area are likely to
• Open space would represent 34,000 of the 248,500 acres grow rapidly. Communities such as Sandy, Canby, and
in the expanded UGR, or 14 percent of the urban land Newberg will be affected by the Metro Council's decisions
area. about managing the region's growth. A significant number of
people would be accommodated in these neighboring cities,
• One third of the buildable acres would allow mixed uses and cooperation between Metro and these communities is
and two thirds would remain in single use categories necessary to address common transportation and land-use
such as residential or industrial. issues.
• The majority of new jobs (two-thirds) would be accom-
modated in centers or along corridors and main streets, There are three key concepts for cooperative agreements
which would be well served by transit. The Industrial with neighbor cities:
Areas would provide land for about 10 percent of new
jobs and Employment Areas would provide spare for 14 There should be a separation of rural land between ea
percent of new jobs. Significantly, residential n,~ighbor- neighboring city and the metropolitan area. If the
hoods account for 15 percent of total jobs (this it ,eludes region grows together, the transportation system would
people working at home, child care, schools, and small suffer and the cities would lose their sense of community
scale commercial within neighborhoods), up from 11 identity.
percent currently. • There should be a strong balance between jobs and
• Land extensive and heavily auto dependent commercial housing in the neighbor cities. The more a city retains a
or industrial uses would be limited to employment areas balance of jobs and households, the more tips will
and industrial areas rather than on corridors, centers or remain local.
neighborhoods. • The "green corridor," highway through a rural reserve
serves as a link between the metropolitan area and a
neighbor city without access to the farms and forests of
Recommended Alternative Elements the rural reserve. This would keep accessibility high,
which encourages employment growth but limits the
This Recommended Alternative is designed to accommodate adverse affect on the surrounding rural areas.
720,000 additional residents and 350,000 additional jobs.
The total population served within this plan is 1.8 million
residents within the Metro boundary. Rurar! Reserves
The basic philosophy of the Recommended Alternative is: These are rural areas that keep adjacent urban areas separate.
preserve our access to nature and build better communities. These rural lands are not needed or planned for develop-
It combines the goals of RUGGO, the values of the region, ment but are more likely to experience development pres-
sures than are areas farther away.
2 Region 2040 - Fall 1994
Ji!
rfi 7 , J ~ ~ ' f ~ 1 . fit' rt ' f a• ~
' ~.f'` o ~ .ttt 4 T^--~~ ice' • T " ~ r
.4V F r;u ~2 r` S S4rL jr
vZ ~ ~ a~ Cd~., s s J ~ a' m~3 t ~f`. •t~ ~ ~ ~3 r r'
® e 4 Ft 5 t t~ ryas' }
e y S~~~a~r ~7rt1r l
o ~ rt
~`i`~'"~ ro Goa ~•i i~~ -L., t4 `c s~" .v .S ~•Y1•!- %
y ~~yptt A
l
3~~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ oaf r
I lo'l 1,11, 1111 11 !Ml
-all
C>_ JAL.,. ~ ^
Vonco`u"e4• i ~1./S~r~t ti. ~ 7~n 1t S`~:.~ i -z1','. ,.vl
_ rn•..,_1= ..ice,-~ ~ ) R
e ic7 ~
Q ! 4
tl ; ~ C
• ill
74--Irv
:1 Np'y "L '4 i '~1} f ~ z " 1 ~..-T ,~a~4•
f Y I ''~`4f .A• }Lw J"a1 ~?`Y 12F. , ~ lI L 1.
,native
'I`H CONc EP DDeiisi~rt~f°~ Tmorrow
~z ..r.
These lands will not be developed in the foreseeable future, unfenced). Many of these natural features already have
an idea that requires agreement among local, regional and significant land set aside as open space. he Tualatin
state agencies. They are areas outside the present urban Mountains, for example, contain major parks such as Forest
growth boundary primarily that connect the region to Park and Tryon Creek State Park and numerous smaller
neighboring cities. parks such as Gabriel Park in Portland and Wilderness Park
in West Linn. Other areas are oriented toward wetlands and
New rural commercial or industrial development would be streams, with Fanno Creek in Washington County having
restricted. Some areas would receive priority status as one of the best systems of parks and open space in the
potential areas for park and open space acquisition. Road region.
improvements would specifically exclude interchanges or
other highway access to the rural road system, similarly, Designating these areas as open spaces would have several
there would be no extensions of urban services. Zoning effects. First, it would remove these land from the category
would be for resource protection on farm and forestry land, of urban land that is available for development. The capac-
and very low density residential (less than one unit for five ity of the urban growth boundary would have to be calcu-
acres) for exception land. lated without these, and plans to accommodate housing and
employment would have to be made without them. Sec-
These rural reserves would support and protect farm and ondly, these natural areas, along with key rural reserve areas,
forestry operations. The reserves also would include some would receive a high priority for purchase as parks and open
purchase of natural areas adjacent to rivers, streams and lakes space, such as Metro's Greenspaces program. Finally,
to make sure the water quality is protected and wildlife regulations could be developed to protect these critical
habitat enhanced. Large natural features, such as hills and natural areas that would not conflict with housing and
buttes, also would be included as rural reserves because they economic goals.
buffer developed areas and are poor candidates for compact
urban development. About 34,000 acres of land and water inside today's urban
growth boundary are included as open spaces in the Recom-
Rural reserves also would be retained to separate cities mended Alternative Map. Preservation of these Open
within the Metro boundary. Cornelius, Hillsboro, Tualatin, Spaces could be achieved by a combination of ways. Some
Sherwood and Wilsonville all have existing areas of rural areas could be purchased by public entities, such as Metro's
land that provides a break in urban patterns. New areas of Greenspaces program or local park departments. Others
urban reserves, that are indicated on the Concept Map are may be donated by private citizens or by developers of
also separated by rural reserves, such as the Damascus- adjacent properties to reduce the impact of development.
Pleasant Valley areas from Happy Valley. Still others could be protected by very low-density residen-
tial zoning, clustering housing on portions of the land while
The primary means of achieving rural reserves would be leaving important features as common open space.
through the regional framework plan for areas within the
Metro boundary, and voluntary agreements among Metro,
the counties, neighboring cities, and the state for those areas Cente"
outside the Metro boundary. These agreements would
prohibit extending urban growth into the rural reserves and Creating higher density centers of employment and housing
require that state agency actions are consistent with the rural is advantageous for several reasons. These centers provide
reserve designation. access to a variety of goods and services in a relatively small
geographic area, creating a intense business climate. Having
centers also makes sense from a transportation perspective,
open spaces since most centers have an accessibility level that is condu-
cive to transit, bicycling and walking. Centers also act as
The areas designated open space on the Concept map are social gathering places and community centers, where people
parks, stream corridors, wetlands and floodplains, largely would find the "small town atmosphere" they cherish.
undeveloped upland areas, or areas of very low density
residential development. (These areas of residential devel- The major advantages of centers in the marketplace are
opment retain a highly open pattern and are generally accessibility and the ability to concentrate goods and services
Region 2040 - Decision-making Kit 3
%
WAVE
in a relatively small area. The challenge, however, is that the strengths of our regional downtown should remain a
most of the eristing centers are already developed and any high priority.
increase in the density must be made through redeveloping
euisting land and buildings. Emphasizing redevelopment in Today, about 20 percent of all employment in the region is
centers over development of new areas of undeveloped land in downtown Portland. Under the Recommended Alterna-
is a key strategy in the Recommended Alternative and tive, downtown Portland would grow at the same rate as the
favored by many citizens. rest of the region, and would remain the location of 20
percent of regional employment. To do this, downtown
The Growth Concept recognizes three types of centers, Portland's 1990 density of 150 people per acre would
distinguished by size and. accessibility. The "central city" is increase to 250 people per acre. Improvements to the transit
downtown Portland and is accessible to millions of people. system network and maintenance of the highway system
"Regional centers" are accessible to hundreds of thousands would provide additional access to and from the city center.
of people, and "town centers" are accessible to tens of
thousands.
Regional centers
The Central City There are seven regional centers, serving five market areas
(outside of the Central City market area). Hillsboro serves
Downtown Portland serves as our major regional center and that western portion of the region, and Gresham the eastern.
functions quite well as an employment and cultural hub for Downtown Beaverton and Washington Square serve the
the metropolitan area. It provides accessibility to the many Washington County area, and Clackamas Town Center and
businesses that require access to a large market area and also Milwaukee together serve Clackamas County and portions of
serves as the location for cultural and social functions that outer south east Portland. Vancover serves Clark County.
draw the region together. It is the center for local, regional, The Central city serves most of the Portland area as a
state, and federal governments, financial institutions, regional center.
commerce, the center for arts and culture, and for visitors to
the region. These Regional Centers would become the focus of compact
development, redevelopment, and transit and highway
In addition, downtown Portland has a high percentage of improvements. The Recommended Alternative accommo-
travel other than by car - three times higher than any other dates three percent of new household growth and 11 percent
part of the region. Jobs and housing are readily available, of new employment- growth in these regional centers. From
without the need for a car. Maintaining and improving upon the current 24 people per acre, the Recommended Alterna-
tive would accommodate about 60 people per acre.
Fs ure ~ a~ie!® a~l.~ Lards. D. a n~T: ~e itac®sroomentled ~i Erna#ive £ was,
d snniaCf~'i '1oAM LGYf r dOAl»~aua`s,'4amiX.itiGm.2a:a.ae~ct:d..+,..._.. fid6~
Design TypeTotal* Vacant Redeveloped
Central City 1,146 115 321
Regional Centers 1,719 154 447
Town Centers 2,156 514 346
Main Streets 2,758 186 352
Corridors station communities 35,519 6,099 4,024
Employment Areas 7,763 3,591 1;121
Industrial Areas 15,045 5,930 3,376
Inner Neighborhoods 52,481 10,224 0**
Outer Neighborhoods 29,537 14,588 2,079*"*
* This is total net acres (built and vacant) within the design type.
No redevelopment was assumed to occur in these areas.
***Assumea redevelopment would occur only outside the present urban growth boundary.
ayy 4 Reglon.2 0 - Fall 1994
Happy Valley and Damascus, to accommodate the retail and
service needs of a growing population while reducing auto
travel. Others would combine a town center within a
Design M um Building regional center, offering the amenities and advantages of
Type Valuation per Acre each type of center.
Central.City $450,000
Regional Centers $360,000 Comma°rs
Town Centers $250,000
Main Streets $240,000 Corridors are not as dense as centers but also are located
Corridors/Commercial Centers $160,000 along good quality transit lines. An example of a present-day
EmploymentAreas $40,000 corridor are Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway or Macadam
Industrial Areas $40,000 Avenue. They provide a place for densities that are some-
Inner Neighborhoods -0- what higher than today. and that are convenient to transit.
Outer Neighborhoods $120,000 Typical new developments would include rowhouses,
(within Urban Reserves) duplexes, and one to three story office and retail buildings,
and average 25 persons per acre.
Transit improvements for regional centers would include
light-rail connecting all regional centers to the Central City.
Highway improvements also would focus on ensuring that Station Communities
these centers are accessible as places to conduct business.
Eventually, these centers would grow to the density of Station communities are nodes of development centered
downtown Vancouver, Washington - about one-third of around a light rail or high capacity transit station. They
downtown Portland's density, but three times denser than provide for the highest density other than that found in
these areas today. regional centers. The station communities would encompass
an area approximately one half mile from a station stop.
The densities of new development would average 45 persons
Town centers per acre. Zoning ordinances now set minimum densities for
most Eastside and Westside MAX station communities. An
Smaller than regional centers and serving populations of tens extensive station community planning program is now tinder
of thousands of people, town centers are the third type of way for each of the Westside station communities, and
center with compact development and transit service. Town similar work is envisioned for the proposed South/North
centers would accommodate about 3 percent of new house- line. It is expected that the station community planning
holds and more than 7 percent of new employment. The process will result in specific strategies and plan changes to
1990 density of an average of 23 people per acre would nearly implement the station communities concept.
double - to about 40 persons per acre, the current densities
of development along Hawthorne Boulevard and in down- Because the Recommended Alternative calls for many
town Hillsboro. corridors and station communities throughout the region,
they would together accommodate 27 percent of the new
Town centers would provide local shopping and employment households of the region and nearly 15 percent of new
opportunities within a local market area. They are designed employment.
to provide local retail and services, at a minimum. They also
would vary greatly in character. Some would become
traditional town centers, such as Lake Oswego, Oregon. City, i1&aasa sareeas
and Forest Grove, while others would change from an auto-
oriented development into a more complete co'amunity, such During the early decades of this century, main streets served
as Hillsdale. Many would also have regional specialties, such by transit and characterized by a strong business and civic
as office centers envisioned for the Ceder Mill town center. community were a major land-use pattern throughout the
Several new town centers are designated, for example, in region. Examples remain in Hillsboro, Milwaukee, Oregon
City and Gresham, as well as the IVestmoreland neighbor-
} Region 2040 - Decision-making Kit
balance would be neighborhood- based employment such as
~~l0d schools, child care and some neighborhood businesses).
Design Type Households Employment Outer neighborhoods would be farther away from large
employment centers and would have larger lot sizes and
Central City 3.3% 20.7% lower densities. Examples include outer suburbs such as f
~
Regional Centers 2.0 6.3 Forest Grove, Sherwood, and Oregon City, and any addi-
Town Centers 2.4 5.3 tions to the urban growth boundary. From 1990 levels of
Main Streets 2.7 5.3 nearly 10 people per acre, outer neighborhoods would
Corridors/station increase to 13 per acre. These areas would accommodate 28
communities 32.7 24.8 percent of new households and 10 percent of new employ-
Employment Areas 2.9 9.5 ment.
Industrial Areas 0.6 11.2
Inner Neighborhoods 33.5 10.1 One of the most significant problems in some newer neigh-
Outer Neighborhoods 18.3 4,9 borhoods is the lack of through streets, a recent phenom-
~pen Spaces 1.6 i,g enon that has occurred in the last 25 years. It is one of the
primary causes of increased congestion in the region.
Traditional neighborhoods contained a grid pattern with up
to 20 through streets per mile. But in new areas, one to two
hood and Hawthorne Boulevard. Today, these areas are dough streets per mile is the norm. Combined with large
undergoing a revival and provide an efficient and effective scale single-use zoning and low densities, it is the major
land-use and transportation alternative. The Recommended cause of increasing auto dependency in neighborhoods.
Alternative calls for main street to grow from 1990 levels of While existing neighborhoods probably will not change,
36 people per acre to 39 per acre. Main arrears would areas of largely vacant land should develop master street
accommodate nearly two percent of housing growth. plans to including at least ten through local streets per mile,
which would allow for better access and still allow some
Main streets typically will serve neighborhoods and may albeit short, cul-de-sacs.
develop a regional specialization - such, as antiques, fine
dining, entertainment, or specialty clothing - that draws
people from other parts of the region. When several main EMP16)=ent areas
streets occur within a few blocks of one another, they serve
as a dispersed town center, such as the main street areas of Industrial areas would be set aside exclusively for industrial
Belmont, Hawthorne, and Division that form a town center activities. They include land-intensive employers, such as
for inner southeast Portland. those around the Portland International Airport, the
Hillsboro Airport and some areas along Highway 212/224.
Industrial areas are expected to accommodate ten percent of
1lreigbborboods regional employment and no households.
Residential neighborhoods would remain a key component Other employment centers would be designated as mixed-
of the Recommended Alternative and would fall into two use employment areas, mixing various types of employment
basic categories. Examples of inner neighborhoods are and including some residential development as well. These
Portland and the older suburbs of Beaverton, Milwaukee and mixed-use employment areas would provide for about five
Lake Oswego, and would include primarily residential areas percent of new households and 14 percent of new employ-
that are accessible to employment. Lot sizes would be meet within the region. Densities would rise substantially
smaller to accommodate densities increasing from 1990 from 1990 levels of about 11 people per acre to 20 people
levels of about 11 people per acre to about 14 per acre.
Inner neighborhoods have smaller lot sizes and better access per etas.
to jobs and shopping. , They would accommodate 28 percent
of new households and 15 percent of new employment (some
of the employment would be home occupations and the
6 Region 2040 - Fall 1994
Urban Reserves Since much of our regional economy depends on the
movement of goods and services, it is essential to keep
One important feature of the Recommended Alternative is congestion on these roads at manageable levels. These
w that it would accommodate all 50 years of forecasted growth major routes frequently serve as transit corridors but are
through a relatively small amount of urban reserves. Urban seldom conducive to bicycles or pedestrians because of the
reserves consist of land set aside outside the present urban volume of auto and freight traffic that they carry.
growth boundary for future growth. The Recommended
Alternative proposes approximately 14,500 acres of Urban With their heavy traffic, and high visibility, these routes are
Reserves to be chosen from a study area of about 22,000 attractive to business. While they serve as an appropriate
acres. In the example reflected in the analysis map over 75 location for auto-oriented businesses, they are poor loca-
percent of these lands are currently zoned for rural housing tions for businesses that are designed to serve neighborhoods
and the remainder are vaned for farm or forestry uses. or sub-regions. Neighborhood uses are better located on
multi-modal arterials. Through routes need the highest
levels of access control, but it is important that they not
Transportation Facilities become barriers to movements across them by other forms
of travel, auto, pedestrian, transit, or bicycle. Through
Transportation elements are needed to create a successful routes should focus on providing access to centers, rather
growth management policy that supports the Recommended than access to the lands that front them.
Alternative. Traditionally, streets have been defined by their
traffic-carrying potential, and transit service according to it's
ability to draw commuters. Other travel modes have not Multi-modal arterials
been viewed as important elements of the transportation
system. The Recommended Alternative establishes a new These represent most of the region's arterials. They include
framework for planning in the region by linldng urban form a variety of design styles and speeds, and are the backbone
to transportation. In this new relationship, transportation is for a system of multi-modal travel options. Older sections of
viewed as a range of travel modes and options that should the region are better designed for multi-modal travel than
reinforce the region's growth management goals. new areas. Although these streets are often smaller than
suburban arterials, they carry a great deal of traffic (up to
Within the framework of the Recommended Alternative is a 30,000 vehicles a day), experience heavy bus ridership along
network of multi-modal corridors and regional through- their routes and are constructed in dense networks that
routes that connect major urban centers and destinations. encourage bicycle and pedestrian travel. The Regional
Through-routes provide for high-volume auto and transit Transportation Plan (RTP) should identify these multi-
travel at a regional scale, and ensure efficient movement of modal streets and develop a plan to further encourage
freight. Within multi-modal corridors, the transportation alternative travel modes within these corridors.
system will provide a broader range of travel mode options,
including auto, transit, bicycle and pedestrian networks, that Many new streets, however, are designed to accommodate
allow choices of how to travel in the region. These travel heavy auto and freight traffic at the expense of other travel
options will encourage the use of alternative modes to the modes. Multiple, wide lanes, dedicated turning lanes,
auto, a shift that has clear benefits for the environment and narrow sidewalks exposed to moving traffic, and widely-
the quality of neighborhoods and urban centers. spaced intersections and street crossings create an environ-
ment that is difficult and dangerous to negotiate without a
car. The RTP should identify these potential multi-modal
Regimwl ebrougb-r0?#" corridors and establish design standards that encourage
other modes of travel along these routes.
These are the routes that move people and goods around the
region, and connect regional centers and the Central Ciry.
They include freeways, limited access highways, and heavily Colkceors and local streets
v,aveled arterials, and usually function as through-routes. As
such, they are important not only because of the movement These streets become a regional priority when a lack of
of people, but as one of the region's major freight systems. adequate connections forces neighborhood traffic onto
Region 21040 - Decision-making Kit 7
a
1 1102
arterials. New suburban development increasingly depends Outer Neighborhoods
on arterial strec to carry trips to local destinations, because
most new local streets systems are specifically designed with Below is an example illustration representing single family
curves and cul-de-sacs to discourage local through travel by homes at 6.6 net homes per acre. The Recommended
any mode. The RTP should consider a minimum standard Alternative assumes 5.7 houses per net acre, or 11 persons
of eight to ten through streets per mile, applied to develop- were acre. Assuming 25 percent of the land is used for
ing or undeveloped areas to reduce local travel on arterials. streets, utilities, etc., the average lot size would be approxi-
There should also be established standard bicycle and mately 7,560 square feet. If streets are built more narrowly,
pedestrian through-routes (via easements, greenways, fire average lot size could be larger. In the Recommended
lanes, etc.) in existing neighborhoods where changes to the Alternative, the lowest density urban residential areas are
street system are not a reasonable alternative. called "Outer Neighborhoods". These Outer Neighbor-
hoods are away from the center of the region along the outer
edge of the UGB and in the urban reserves. They represent
Light rail people trading larger lot size for greater distances to most
jobs.
Light rail transit (LM daily travel capacity measures in tens
of thousands of riders, and provides a critical travel option to (Note: the diagrams are to scale, in this and the succeeding
major destinations. The primary function of light rail diagrams the outside box represents the size of land area
(I,RT) in the Recommended Alternative is to link regional necessary to accommodate 100 dwelling units. The sub-
centers and the Central City, where concentrations of heading lists the acres needed to fit 100 of the units. For
housing and employment reach a level that can justify the example, for the standard-lot, single family home below you
cost of developing a fixed transit system. In addition to would need 15 net acres for 100 homes.)
their role in developing regional centers, LRT lines can also
support significant concentrations of housing and employ- In the Outer Neighborhoods, the average lot size would be
meet at individual station areas along their routes. LRT also somewhat smaller than the current region-wide average of
supports land use, especially in anchoring downtown Port- 8,500 square feet. However, the current average includes
land. lots as large as a half acre, about 20,000 square feet. A small
number of lots this size can substantially increase the
average. The most common new lot size being developed in
Regional design images the region is about 7,500 square feet, in line with what the
Recommended Alternative is suggesting. Outer neighbor-
In Concepts for Growth we included designs of specific areas of hoods would account for approximately 28 percent of the
the region which illustrated what kinds of land use changes new households of the region.
could be undertaken to accommodate growth in the area.
We did not complete such site specific designs for the
Recommended Alternative, although we do have a way to iren~r Neighborhoods
illustrate the kinds of development types that would have to
be built to achieve the Recommended Alternative. Inner Neighborhoods are closer-in residential areas with an
average lot size of 5,700 square feet, 7.6 units per net acre.
Residential development, particularly single family detached This would be 13 person per acre. These neighborhoods
housing, uses the largest amount of land within the urban would accommodate about 21 percent of new households. It
growth boundary. For this reason, changes to residential should be noted that most of the pre-World War II single
density have the greatest effect on the amount of urban land family homes in the region are on 5,000 square foot lots, so
needed. In the Recommended Alternative 62 percent of new the Recommended Alternative is suggesting a residential
residential development would be single family homes, this pattern slightly less dense than many existing neighbor-
compares with 70 percent single family development in hoods. The Inner Neighborhood, however, is denser than
1990. many existing suburban neighborhoods, particularly those
built in the 1960s and 1970s
a Region 2040 Fall 1994
Standard-Lot Singk-Fancily
SzouLard Lot Singh-Family 1-2 story buildings
1 Sar/100du Parking m recessed or alley accessed garages
6.6 dwelling units per acre
Ownership
Both Inner and Outer Neighborhoods are expressed in
Ss9aald--Lot Burgle-Family average number of homes per net buildable acre. As with all
9.4ac/IOOdu averages, different mixes of smaller and larger lots could be
used to achieve the average. A type of smaller lot develop-
ment is illustrated below, this example accommodates 10 net
homes per acre,
Corridors and Station Communities
a Corridors are not as dense as centers (see below) but are also
C located along good quality transit lines. Examples of present
f-== day corridors are the Beaverton-Hillsdale Mghway and
Macadam Boulevards. They would provide a place for
densities that are somewhat higher than today, should have a
quality pedestrian environment and are convenient to
transit. Corridors would grow from 1990 densities averag-
ing approximately lg people per acre to an average of
approximately 22 people per acre. This would be on average
12.5 units per net acre. Typical development along corridors
Snalf--Lot Single-Family would include rowhouses, duplexes and one to three story
1-2 story buildings office and retail buildings.
Parking in recessed or a&wy accessed garages
10.6 dwelling units/acre
fwnersbip
Region.2040 - Decision-making Kit
I MIS Nglig 1115
OEM
Ti
Thmh wnbomes
00 Carriage Units (Wan Law)
6acl100&
os ~
® ee
i
Townbomer
1-2 story buildings
Parking in alley accessed garages Carriage Units (with do Law)
22 dwelling unit here 1-2 story buildings
Ownership Ancillary (in-kw) unit placed over detached garage
Parking in alley accessed garages
16.6 dwelling units/acre
Ownership
Station communities are nodes of development organized In summary, there are three important paints about these
around a Light hail or High Capacity transit station. They residential housing types. First, many people will continue
provide for the highest density outside of centers. The to live in larger lot single family homes. Secondly, our
station communities would grow from 1990 densities demographic forecasts indicate that the population of the
averaging approximately 22 persons per acre to an average of region will be changing. The portion of the population age
45 persons per acre, or 23 housing units per net acre. 65 or over will increase from 13 percent (1990) to about 24
Minimum densities have been established for most Eastside percent (2040). Household size is also expected to decrease.
and Westside MAX station communities. An extensive These trends could support smaller, more compact residen-
station community planning program is now under way for tial patterns. Finally, small decreases in average lot size
each of the Westside Light hail station community areas. greatly reduce the amount UGB expansion needed. A
Similar work is envisioned for the proposed South/North reduction from the current average lot size of 8,500 square
line. It is expected that the station community planning feet to 7,000 square foot will save about 15,000 acres of land
process will result in specific strategies and plan changes to that otherwise would need to be added to the UGB, an area
implement the station communities concept. about the size of Gresham. Most of the increased density
needed in order to minimize expansions of the UGB can be
The illustrations below show carriage homes and accommodated by no more than two st^rr homes on their
townhouses (rowhouses) which provide home ownership, but own lot. Keep in mind that the above illustrations are to
are able to accommodate many more households. For scale and show a way for 100 households to be accommo-
example, the carriage homes (with an "in-law" unit) aceom- dated. Compare the size of the overall square (which
modate 16 net homes per acre, while townhouses accommo- represents the, space needed to fit 100 dwelling units) with
date 20-22 homes per net acre. Twenty percent of the single the others; with more density, less land is used.
family homes in the Recommended Alternative would be
small lot or townhouse types.
10 Region 2040 - Fall 1994
Fill
Podium Apartments Tuck-under apartments Garden Apartments
Podium Apartments
3-4 story buiOngr
Structured parking is Tuck-under Apartments
placed below grade and 2-3 story buildings
interior to the building At grade parking is placed in
66 dwekying units/acre parking garages that are tucked
Rental or condominium under the building Garden Apartments
40 dwelling units/acre 2-3 story buildings
Rental or condominiums Surface parking is placed in central
parking ciourts or behind buildings
26 units per acre
Rental or condonriniuna
Neighborhood, Town and Regional Centers As noted earlier, over 60 percent of all new jobs would be
accommodated in the centers or corridors designated in the
Multi-family development in 1990 provided 32 percent of Recommended Alternative. These areas are intended to be
total housing units. Under the Recommended Alternative, compactly built and well served with transit. Office struc-
38 percent of new housing units would be multi-family tures are a way to accommodate much of the employment in
housing. This would include apartments (both rental and centers and corridors. Of course the mixed use structures
ownership possible) as illustrated below. The podium included above would also provide places for employment in
apartments represent the type of residential development in the centers and corridors.
Regional Centers, the "tuck-under" units are similar to the
densities in Town Center and Main Streets, while the
garden apartments represent building types in Neighbor-
hood Areas Centers.
In the Employment Areas, a mix of land uses would be
however, some of the multi-family homes would be a part encouraged. The primary use would be employment, but
of mixed use developments adjacent to transit stops either residential,uses would also be allowed. Employment areas
along corridors or in commercial, town, regional or city would mix commercial, light industrial and residential uses
centers. These multi-family types are illustrated below in a compact way, providing affordable and convenient
The major difference between them is how parking is housing while reducing auto dependence. The uses in
accommodated. In the "retail-office-residential mixed-use", Employment areas would not necessarily be within one
the buildings are four to five stories in height with struc- building, but would be in relatively close proximity to each
tarred parking. The "retail-residential mixed-use" is two to other.
three stories with surface parking.
Reglon 2040 - Decision-making Kit I9
Retail Mixed Use Mixed-Use in St. Retail-OfficeResidential Mixed Use
Mixed-use main St.
1.2-acre site 2-3 Story Buildings (gv ound floor 1.2-acre site 4-5 story buildings (ground floor
retail with offwe space above) retail, 1-2 kvels of office and 2-3
Stcrfacegarking isglaced behind the levels of retail)
building Structured Parking is placed below
137 jobs/acre a' grade or interior to the building
a 12SjoWacre
62. S swelling unitslacre
~a cs
Industrial areas are reserved for employment, residential uses redevelopable lands totaling an additional 1, 100 net acres.
would not be allowed, and many retail and commercial uses Accordingly, 37 percent of the total developable land in
would be discouraged. Traditional uses, building types and these centers would need to be intensified in order to
employment are assumed to continue in these areas. implement the Recommended Alternative.
While Main Streets also show very little available land when
Recommended Alternative Analysis compared with some design types, redevelopment would
allow these areas to capture almost twice the development
As indicated above, we prepared an example of how the potential available through the vacant land supply. Corri-
Growth Concept could be construed. This enables us to dors and commercial centers with over 6,000 acres of vacant
show at least one way in which the Growth Concept could land and 4,000 acres of redevelopment land utilize 27
work. It is consistent with the analysis map and the results percent of the buildable land within the design type for
are described below accommodating growth.
Redevelopment plays a key role in of the Recommended
Land use Alternative. Current building valuations were used to
establish long term redevelopment potential. The following
In order to better understand what the Recommended table shows the maximum building valuation used for
Alternative would require to be implemented, Tigure 1 choosing redevelopment according to the design categories
shows the total acres and buildable land (vacant and used.
redevelopable) assumed for each design type. The vacant
lands are actual numbers of acres inventoried as buildable, Over 50 years, buildings with relatively low valuations were
while the redeveloped acres are assumed to redevelop over assumed to redevelop in the centers, main streets, and
the next 50 years. corridors. No redevelopment was assumed in neighbor-
hoods except those in potential Urban Reserves even though
The biggest vacant land supply is in the neighborhood a modest level of redevelopment will occur of very low value
categories where almost 23,000 vacant acres exist. The other buildings. Only low value buildings (less than $40,000/acre)
large supply is in the Employment Areas and Industrial were assumed to redevelop on industrial or mixed use
Areas, where 9,500 acres of vacant land exist and about 4,500 employment land. These redevelopment criteria allowed 21
acres of redevelopable land were assumed. percent of new households and 18 percent of new employ-
meet to be accommodated through redevelopment. Rede-
The larger centers - town, regional and city - have small velopment of higher value properties in the Central City and
amounts of vacant buildable land - in total less than 800 net Regional Centers would occur over time as more develop-
acres. These vacant lands are supplemented by meat takes place and land values rise.
_ i
12 Region 2040 - Fall 1994
MV INMN'11111=111
my=
Ce Qj)ice (Lm inte wow) 0.~ Oigb intensity)
1. s ce site 2-3 story buildings 44 story buildings
Surface parking is placed behind the Structured parking it placed bekv
building grade or interioir to the building -
AN buildings orient to streets of public Aid buildings orient to streets or
plazas and parks public plaza and parks
90% floor area ratio ' 200% floor are ratio ausamed
assumed 0 me jobs are calculated at 340 grcvs
Vice jobs are calculated - sq. ft./ employee or 300
at 440 grtus sq ftl jobs/acre
employee or 95'jobs/acre. I parking spaceloffla
e eeg face employee on site.
empkygkyet on n site site ,M. s1
It is important to understand that redevelopment includes The Central City would maintain its current share of 20
intensification of a site, and it does not necessarily destroy percent of regional employment by adding 80,000 jobs. The
the existing buildings on the site. For example, new build- Regional Centers would double their share of employment
ings in the parking lot of an existing complex is one common (to 6 percent) adding 40,000 employees. The Town Centers
type of redevelopment. Conversion of a single family home would increase their employment share from 3 percent to 5
to an office or restaurant is another common example of percent with 27,000 jobs. Corridors and station comnuni-
redevelopment that conserves existing structures. Redevel- ties would lose a small percentage of their regional share
opment thorough additions to existing structures would be mostly due to the effects of new growth on vacant land in
more common outside the central city area, where existing new urban reserves and elsewhere, but they still receive
densities are low. 64,000 jobs. Employment Areas would still add a sizeable
amount - 50,000 jobs. The Industrial Areas would maintain
11,000 acres or 57 percent of the redevelopment land occurs approximately 12 percent of the region's employment by
in mixed use areas. This 11,000 acres represents only six adding 35,000 jobs. Employment in neighborhoods (home
percent of the gross developable acres in the region. The occupations or jobs located in schools, child care centers or
redevelopment land in the Central City would accommodate very small commercial sites) would remain approximately
70 percent more employees (80,000) as it did in 1990. constant with today's share (IS percent), locating 37,000 new
Regional Centers would utilize redevelopment land at jobs there.
almost three times the existing density. Town Centers would
double the capacity on redevelopment land, as did main The large household increases occur in corridors and
streets. Similarly, redevelopment along corridors create a commercial centers (100,000 new households), and in
threefold increase of the housing units there - a net increase neighborhoods (175,000 new households). The corridors'
of 30,500 households. The centers' housing density would share of the region's households would drop slightly as
increase on redevelopment land by more than five-fold, from expansion and new growth dilute corridor concentrations.
1,000 - 1,500 units in 1992 to 5,000 - 10,000 units in 2040. The household share drops for closer-in neighborhoods, but
This growth is the result of the greater density called for in rises for those further out in the new Urban Reserve areas,
these areas. Resignations in the Recommended Alternative where the regional share rises markedly as 59,000 house-
would allow higher density condominituns and apartments holds locate beyond the current UGB (16 percent of the new
(30 - ISO units/acre, 2-8 stories). Redevelopment in centers residents). The Corridors and Centers add almost 41,000
and corridors reinforces transit and provides the opportunity households increasing their share of residents by 50 percent.
for more non-auto trips and concentrates redevelopment and Employment Areas also receive about 20,000 households - a
higher density in relatively small portions of the region - as six-fold increase in what was almost exclusively employment
compared with increasing densities throughout the region. land before.
The overall distribution of households and employees by To the extent that the area inside the current UGB can't
design type in 2040 can be seen in Figure 3. accommodate additional growth, Urban Reserves would be
Region 2MO - Decision-making Kit 13
Film=
needed. These are areas designated to be converted to urban form and our ability to serve a growing population with a
uses if and when a need for additional urban land is found. balanced transportation system. As we refine the Regional
The Recommended Alternative would require potential Framework Plan, the interplay between transportation and
Urban Reserves of 14,500 gross acres. land use needs will continue to shape both urban growth and
regional transportation policies.
The potential Urban Reserves designation considered state
and regional criteria. The ability to serve areas with sanitary Though detailed, our modeling does not address cost
sewer and water, access to jobs, potential health hazards and effectiveness of the networks or potential land use impacts,
avoidance of exclusive farm use zones were weighed. In and is not intended to be a comprehensive study of specific
Rural Reserve areas the desire to keep communities separate transportation needs. Instead, actual transportation needs,
znd efficient provision of facilities and services were consid- corridors and modes will be established in an updated
ered. The potential Urban Reserves Map is intended to Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The updated RTP
provide an overall direction for decision makers. Property will serve as the transportation element of the Regional
specific designations of Urban Reserves will occur after the Framework Plan, and will address transportation planning
Metro Council concludes its decision about the Recom- requirements of the Metro charter, state Transportation
mended Alternative. Planning Rule and Federal ISTEA.
In contrast to Urban Reserves, Rural Reserves have been Once the updated RTP is complete, detailed transportation
included as a category in the Recommended Alternative to alignments may need to be developed to implement specific
protect rural areas. The Rural Reserves are areas into which corridors within the region. We will also work closely with
no expansion of Urban Reserves or the UGB willbe allowed. local planners to further coordinate regional transportation
They are intended to protect commercial, agricultural and goals with the development of local transportation plans.
forest activities, providing separation between urban areas.
Existing large lot rural residential uses would be allowed to Connecting land use and transportation
continue as would development of existing lots of record,
five acres or larger. However, no expansion of large lot Two principles guided the development of the transportation
residential zoning would be permitted. system in the Recommended'Alternative - coordination of
land use pattern and transportation decisions and a balanced
Neighboring cities, or those cities directly connected to the transportation system. This was done by creating a network
Metro region by a major highway or road, are also addressed where the Recommended Alternative land uses and urban
in the Recommended Alternative. About 86,000 residents form were fully complemented by a range of transportation
and 49,000 jobs are planned to be accommodated in neigh- options. In general, urban centers are connected by a set of
boring cities, primarily Sandy, Canby and Newberg. These multi-modal corridors that accommodate auto, transit,
cities administer their own urban growth boundaries, bicycle and pedestrian travel to varying degrees.
independent of Metro urban growth boundary decisions.
These communities, either within their present UGR or Regional Centers and the Central City would have the most
Urban Reserves adopted or under review, could accommo- intensive package of transportation improvements and
date these jobs and households. However, the issue of services, reflecting their central role. They would be easily
maintaining separation between urban areas is of mutual accessible by multi-modal corridors and would have efficient
interest to Metro and the neighboring cities as are issues of pedestrian and bicycle circulation within the Centers. Town
access and job creation. *Centers would be similarly served with a multi-modal range
of travel options, but the magnitude of transportation
infrastructure would be generally less than the Regional
Transportation Centers. Corridors, Station communities, and Main Streets
would be characterized by high-quality transit service,
The Region 2040 Recommended Alternative establishes a bicycle and pedestrian amenities along the roadways, and less
land use context for future transportation planning efforts. auto traffic than other arterial streets.
We modeled transportation networks for the three concepts
and the Recommended Alternative. -The results allow us to Employment Areas and Industrial Areas would have more
examine the viability of the Recommended Alternative urban roadway connections, especially truck routes and better
14 Region 2040 Fail 1994
access to the regional highway network and would have
specialized transit service to major destinations. Highway and Tminsit ImpmvementS.
The Recommended Alternative also focused on connectivity
and the development of Regional Centers. Our primary
es -
objective in designing the preferred roadway network was to
create a dense, connected system that dispersed travel
demand and reinforced the regional centers. Using the
current RTP as a starting point, local planners helped us s
determine where collector and arterial streets could be
connected, and where new streets could be extended. These
® o
new connections were designed to enhance auto, transit, ` .7
bicycle and pedestrian travel options throughout the region,
and particularly in the vicinity of the Regional Centers.
Another feature of the transportation system was keeping Creek, Damascus and Highway 26. The southern alignment
arterials livable. While peak-hour congestion at street is used because it best supports the development of the
intersections is to be expected, local planners helped us Damascus Town Center. Although the actual model con-
define parallel routes that might improve local circulation, tains a "build-out" of the highway, the inclusion of the
while avoiding the development of massive arterial streets Sunrise route assumes a phased-in approach, with the
whose sole discourages the use of non-auto modes and portion west of Damascus improved first, along with the
undermines livability. In some cases, proposed highway- acquisition of right-of-way and construction of the segment
type facilities were dropped in favor of a series of smaller- extending east of the proposed urban reserve boundary. The
scale arterial and collector street connections. remaining sections would be improved over time, reflecting
gradual development of the Damascus town center.
Major bigbway tbrougb-rouges to connect Regional Centers Finally, a new Highway link from I-5 to 99W, is included as
and Neigbboring Cities a freight connection, and as a primary route to Newberg -
one of the two neighboring cities included in the Recom-
New highways have the potential to enhance the develop- mended Alternative. This connection is also intended to
ment of Regional Centers and the movement of goods divert through-traffic from Highway 99W and Tualatin-
throughout the region. However, new highways can also Sherwood Road that might otherwise undermine the
encourage urban sprawl, and undermine the viability of development of town centers in Tualatin and Tigard. To
Regional Centers. improve circulation and access in Washington county, new
arterials and collector streets were modeled in the area
The Mt. Hood Parkway is included in the recommended between US 26 and Tualatin Valley Highway. New freeway
network to reinforce the Gresham Regional Center, provide capacity was added to Highway 217. To address freight
a freight route from I-84 to Highway 26 and better connect movements from Washington County to the I-5 corridor,
Sandy - a Neighboring City in the Recommended Alterna- capacity was added to Highway 217 in the model. North/
five - to the urban area. The parkway is modeled with South from Tualatin Valley Highway to Highway 26, was
limited access, an 1-84 interchange, split access to the not included as a freeway, but a package of North/South
Gresham Regional Center, and an interchange at Highway arterial and collector street improvements was modeled to
26. improve mobility in this area for all modes of travel.
The southern alignment of the Sunrise Highway is similarly Although not included in our modeling, the growth of
modeled as a second route to Sandy, a freight connection neighboring cities, such as Sandy and Newberg, along major
from 1-205 to Highway 26, and to support development of freight routes will ultimately affect through-travel, and could
the Clackamas and Rtilwaukie Regional Centers. The create a need for bypass routes. Such impacts should be
Sunrise Highway modeling assumes limited access, with considered as part of implementing the Regional Framework
interchanges at I-205, the Clackamas industrial area, Rock Plan and each of these local comprehensive plans.
Region 2040 - Decision-making Kit °i5
+LS l _
Ligbt Rag eonneetionr these cities that travel through rural areas are still designed
as Green Corridor facilities in the Recommended nemork.
Tri-Met staff led the effort to design a Recommended
Alternative transit system. The backbone of the transit As with the previous growth concepts, we modeled a possible
network is a series of radial Light Rail Transit (LRT) transportation system for the Recommended Alternative.
corridors that connect the Regional Centers to the Central The results are heartening.
City. These radial routes include the Banfield and Westside
LRT lines, and LRT routes south to 1Vlilwaulde and With a road network somewhat larger than the other growth
Clackamas Town Center, north to Clark County, and a concepts, but a compact form, the Recommended Alterna-
Westside spur to Washington Square. Several alignments Live is projected to have less congestion than both Concepts
are conceptual, actual alignments of planned connections, A and B. Only Concept C, which assumes that one-third of
will be determined in later, more detailed studies. future growth will be in neighboring cities, would have
slightly less congestion. However, overall congestion in the
In addition to an extensive network of local bus lines, we Recommended concept would still be double today's levels.
have included a new level of service, called Fastlink, that
offers streamlined, express-type service to Regional Centers Our analysis of the model results also shows that areas of the
and along major corridors. Although still under develop- region with dense networks of through streets would have
ment, FastLink service is envisioned to be a bridge between less PM. peak-hour congestion, including close-in neighbor-
light rail and traditional bus service, with amenity-oriented hoods near the Central City. In contrast, areas with a more
buses that serve more widely-spaced "stations. dispersed, less connected roadway system are projected to
have significant peak-hour congestion - despite a number
Critical aspects of the transit system are improvements made of modeled roadway additions to these more dispersed
to the road network and pedestrian improvements. The networks.
road improvements discussed above increase connectivity for
autos, transit, bikes and pedestrians. In addition to improved Though transit service in the Recommended Alternative was
street connectivity in the vicinity of Regional Centers, less extensive than any other growth scenario, the close
bicycle and pedestrian travel is encouraged in the Recom- ordination of land use and transit helped to produce had
mended Alternative through improved amenities (modeled the best transit ridership of any concept. Transit ridership
as pedestrian environmental factors, or PEFs) within the was also encouraged in the Recommended Alternative by
regional centers, and parking cost factors applied to auto modeled parking factors and pedestrian amenities in urban
travel to the centers. As the Regional Framework Plan is centers and transit-supportive corridors. Despite a less
developed these modelling considerations will be translated extensive light rail system than other growth concepts and
into bicycle and pedestrian system improvements and the addition of more land to the urban area in this scenario,
parking management programs iailored to each of the six the percentage of jobs and households served by transit in
Regional Centers. the Recommended Alternative would be nearly the same as
current levels..
The Recommended Alternative assumes a series of "Green
Corridor" transportation links to neighboring cities that
span Rural Reserves. In the cases of Sandy and Newberg, Daily Transit Service and Ridership
the Green Corridors feature high performance, limited
access highways, high-duality transit, and bicycle and $ M
pedestrian facilities that give easy access to the neighboring 12 / too
cities while minimizing urban development pressure on the 10 / 4M
• = t+o
intervening rural landscape. o
a
Although other outlying towns are not planned to absorb a a j 100
significant sliare of growth in the Recommended Alternative, o 0
many are already experiencing growth today. Though major
Lum nsportation improvements to these towns are not included s e e
the Recommended Alternative, odsting highway links to
itegi on 2"0 - Fail 1994
I'M
I'll'i 151:11
ffm
Parks and cpen space
!/MT Per vita and 'dotal VMT The primary objective is to preserve natural areas and open
spaces within an intensifying metropolitan area so that the
region has active and passive recreational opportunities and
u is not exclusively urban from one end of the UGB to the
e other. The Recommended Alternative specifically accounts
® ~ wowvasr for open space on its map and in its capacity analysis.
Within the definition of open space is included public and
s private land that cannot be built on because it is in flood-
plains, wetlands, and parks (15,300 acres). Additional land
~q ®Q y would be added that buffers stream corridors and significant
topographic features as well as significant habitat areas from
the Greenspaces Master Plan. These additions would bring
the total open spaces to 34,000 acres. Much of the open
With regard to the state Transportation Rule requirement of spaces are vacant and privately owned (12,350 acres). Of the
a 20 percent reduction in vehicle miles travelled (VM f) over vacant land only 5,000 gross acres is considered buildable
the next thirty years, the Recommended Alternative would when environmental constraints and gross to net reductions
are taken into account.
achieve a drop of just over five percent during the 50-year
planning period. Though less than Concept B, this VAIT A portion of the total open space (6,400 acres) is already
per capita reduction is better than the other scenarios. developed, but at very low densities. While development
These modelling conclusions show the feasibility of serving within areas designated as open space would not be expected
to be removed, additional development would be discour-
aged. In addition, while some areas of privately owned,
attainable transportation system. Such a system provides for undeveloped land may be designated as open space, the
continued mobility via the automobile, ensures freight intent is to encourage the local jurisdictions to conserve
efficient movement on the regional highway system and these open spaces by clustering any permitted density,
offers attractive passenger travel options to the automobile leaving the bulk of the remaining land undeveloped.
via transit, bicycle and pedestrian modes.
Air quality
Wbar can we nrp:zave?
The lessons learned from developing the Recommended Air quality concerns carbon monoxide (CO) in the winter
Alternative will provide a valuable starting point for updat- and ground level ozone (03) in the summer. Forecasts show
ing the RTP. While individual road and transit links were potential problems with the ground level ozone, beginning
modeled in a conceptual manner, the Recommended Alter- in 2007. These problems will be exacerbated by all pollution
native will still help us address key policy issues about the sources, not only transportation related sources.
mix transportation modes, the need to complement transit
routes with supporting land uses, and the need to limit the None the less, air quality modeling results for transportation
impact of urban travel routes on rural land uses. sources were encouraging. When the Recommended
Alternative is compared with the other growth concepts;
The Recommended Alternative also gives us valuable data relatively low levels of transportation generated air pollut-
with which to establish specific objectives and indicators for ants are projected. For a seven county region (Clackamas,
transportation service and performance. These may include Clark, Columbia, Marion, Multnomah, Yamhill and Wash-
roadway density vs. capacity ratios, transit service thresholds, .ington counties) the Recommended Alternative would have
bicycle and pedestrian accessibility targets, freight move- the lowest forecast levels of CO. On a four county basis, the
meat considerations and levels of tolerable peak-hour Recommended Alternative would generate sl?ghtly more CO
congestion in specific urban environments and situations. than Concept C, but less than any of the other growth
concepts.
Region 2040 - Decision-making Kit 17
11!11111101 MMMMS 1: 0 gig III Inn=
The'Recommended Alternative, on a seven county basis, Housing
would have the second lowest level of projected transporta-
tion generated hydrocarbons, while on a four county basis, As noted earlier, the largest amount of land in the region is
concepts B and C would generate somewhat less. It should devoted to residential uses. Of this, by far the most land is
be kept in mind that because of fleet emission improve- used for single family development. With the Recom-
ments, the projections for hydrocarbon and CO levels from mended Alternative, the new development, which would be
transportation sources are less than existing (1990) levels. at a ratio of 62 percent single family to 38 percent multi
That is, for two important air pollutants, transportation will family, is more compact than existing development, with a
generate less pollutants than today. ratio of 70 percent single family to 30 percent multi family.
However, the Recommended Alternative includes as single
However, for the third key pollutant, oxides of nitrogen, all family about 78,000 new homes that would be built at 10.5
growth concepts would show an increase from transportation dwelling units per gross acre - average lot sizes of 3,000
sources. For the seven county area, concept B would square feet or less. These units comprise about 20 percent
generate less oxides of nitrogen than any other, while the of the total new single family units assumed to be built over
Recommended Alternative would be second best. For the 50 years. These higher densities could be met by combina-
four county area, the Recommended Alternative again is lions of single family and multi-family, accessory units ( or
projected to have slightly more air pollution that concept B, "granny flats") or developments such as rowhouses, duplexes,
but would have better predicted performance than all other and small lot single family along corridors and in Station
growth concepts. Communities.
New housing in the centers is almost exclusively multi-
Ene~sloy+ni~nt family, while the neighborhood categories are predominantly
single family. This difference between centers and neighbor-
As indicated in Concepts fur Growth, given our population and hoods reflects the strategy in the Recommended Alternative
employment forecasts it appears that in aggregate there is to locate higher density housing only in very accessible
sufficient land for employment uses. The Recommended locations. The corridors and station communities show a
Alternative, although different than the other analyzed mix of housing (35 percent single family to 65 percent
concepts, includes very similar amounts of employment land. multi-family) that often borders both transit and neighbor-
If the same analysis method is used, we would conclude that hoods.
some areas, particularly in Hillsboro and along the Columbia
South Shore, appear to have more land than is likely to be The Metro Housing Rude was set both to contain the UGB
needed over the 50 year time horizon of the study and ensure affordable housing. If we move away from
jurisdictional goals to the target areas in the Recommended
Having a surplus of such land may provide flexibility in Alternative we need to revisit each jurisdiction's responsibil-
locational decisions, although some land owners may ity for affordable housing. Metro's primary responsibility is
question the designation if development is not feasible to ensure an adequate land supply to accommodate housing
because of lack of market demand. Regardless, a more demand. The Recommended Alternative would accomplish
public concern is the balance between jobs and housing in this by moderate expansions of the urban growth boundary,
the region. The jobs housing table below shows each of the higher densities, and some redevelopment.
Regional Centers and the areas for which a jobs/housing
ratio was calculated under the Recommended Alternative. In our discussions with affordable housing providers and
advocates, they indicated that unless specific policies address
Portland would continue to be a jobs rich area, while other the issue, little progress is likely. Policies and incentives to
areas such as Clackamas Town Center would become more the private sector in particular, but also to non-profit
housing rich than they currently are. The overall trend is agencies, to encourage affordable housing would be needed.
towards more housing and less jobs. This is in line with
national trends for the time period due to the aging of the
population. The need for housing remains, but the percent-
age of the population participating in the workforce will
decline as greater numbers of people are retired.
tt3 Reglon 2040 - Fall 1994
NMI
Recommended
1990 Base Case Concept A Concept >B Concept C Alternative
Demograpby
Population 1,032,471 1,917,284 1,943,895 1,904,799 1,678,720 1,862,182
Households 410,853 827,843 839,333 822,452 724,836 804,051
gobs 723,982 1,284,210 1,305,193 1,293,427 1,169,913 1,257,365
Single-Family/Multi-Family 70/30 70/30 74/26 60/40 69/31 65/32
Location of Growtb
% of growth in existing - 83% 71% 100% 63% 87%
Metro UGB
% of growth accommodated - 0% 6% 18% 8% 19%
by redevelopment
EFU conversion - 63,900 17,200 0 11,400 3,545
% of employment on
Industrial land 32% 43% 53% 33% 54% 2S%
Transportation
Vehicle Miles Traveled 12.40 13.04 12.48 10.86 11.92 11.76
per Capita
Mode Split 92/3/5 92/3/5 91/4/5 88/6/6 89/5/6 881616
(Auto/Transit/Walk-Bike)
Congested Road Miles 151 506 682 643 404 454
Transit Riders 136,800 338,323• 372,400 527,800 437,200 570,000
Average PM Speed (mph) 30 28 24 24 27 26
Transit Service Fours 4,983 9,600 12,300 13,200 12,600 12,000
Air Quality
CC Winter (Kg/day) 835,115 614,451 613,537 579,579 569,091 574,749
CO Summer 574,708 528,601 525,133 496,017 487,188 491,995
HC Summer 177,857 70,700 69,810 66,375 65,745 663391
NOx Summer 80,452 94,024 90,987 83,817 86,988 86,230
Water
Drinking Water Costs - - Moderate I,ow Moderate Bower
Wastewater Costs - - Moderate Moderate High Moderate
Stormwater Costs - - Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate
The Ave Case did not have parking factors and pedestrian factors modeled consistent with the otbergr=6 concepts.
- Region 2040 - Decision-making Kit 19
Social stability should best meet the challenges of the future. It attempts to
blend technical analysis and the concerns heard so far from
For the earlier growth concepts we asked law enforcement, the public. It balances the concerns about expansion of the
fire fighting and emergency medical response officials which urban growth boundary with concerns about higher densities
concept might be most easily served. Their answers consid- and providing housing choice. It provides mobility and
ered response times and design elements that foster a strong, mode choice by planning for more light rail and bus service,
sense of community. Applying those criteria to the Recom- while considering the cost effectiveness of such services. It
mended Alternative, we conclude that it would likely have models expansions of the road and highway network, with
response times better than Concept A. because the total improvements linked to serving critical land uses.
urban land area is less. Additionally, the Recommended
Alternative is similar in response times to Concepts R or C The Recommended Alternative will be scrutinized by the
and much better than the Rase Case. The Recommended public, interested parties, Metro advisory committees and
Alternative is likely to do as well or better than the concepts the Metro Council. Changes to the Recommended Alterna-
previously analyzed when considering crime and safety five will undoubtably be made prior to adoption. The Metro
issues. Council, once satisfied with the revisions they direct, will
adopt a map and text that will be incorporated into the
Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives (RUGGO).
Water facilities The Recommended Alternative through this process will be
distilled into basic principles and a map and become the
In analyzing the growth concepts, sewer and water profes- formally adopted Region 2040 Growth Concept. The
sionals of the region considered a myriad of criteria. They directions set by this decision will become the foundation for
concluded that the potential cost differences between the Charter mandated Regional Framework Plan.
concepts for stormwater were too small to predict differ-
ences and a similar conclusion with regard to stormwater
costs and the Recommended Alternative can be reached.
However, service providers did find differences in water and
sanitary sewer costs. Consistent with their findings, it seems
likely that the Recommended Alternative would have slightly
higher costs than Concept R, but lower than A or C for
water and sanitary sewer services.
A regional water supply study is currently being completed
by the water providers of the region and Metro. This
analysis is using the Region 2040 growth assumptions and
data to evaluate alternative approaches and reach conclusions
about the most effective solutions to address water supply
issues in the region. These conclusions should prove useful
in preparing the Regional Framework Plan.
Summary
We have studied, analyzed, modeled, talked, changed,
amended, defined and redefined. It is now time for a
regional decision on how we want this area to grow over the
next 50 years.
The Recommended Alternative is intended as sn focal point
of discussion as to how the citizens of this region believe we
2b Region 2040 - Fall 1994
.~y
M
M E M O R A N O U M
ID
METRO
Date: September 14, 1994
To: Metro Council
Metro Policy Advisory Committee
Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation
Future Vision Commission
From: John Fregonese, Senior Manager, Growth Managemen
Planning Department
Regarding: RIBGGO Amendments
Attached are the Proposed Amendments to RUGGO for your consideration.
1) Goal I was modified to reflect the Charter mandated implementation responsibilities. Of note are the
additions of the Regional Framework Plan to the sections dealing with functional plans. This extends the
RUGGO process for developing, adopting and implementing functional plans to the Regional Framework
Plan.
2) Goal Ii was not amended.
3). A new "Growth Concept" section was added (11.4, page 34) to describe the findings and conclusions of
the Recommended Alternative.
4) The Glossary (page 45) was updated to include new language developed as part of Region 2040 and
the Recommended Alternative.
It is clear in reading the entire document that we have evolved significantly since RUGGO was adopted.
While most of the RUGGO objectives continue to be valid, they should be refined and strengthened in light
of the Metro Charter and the Region 2040 Concept. In addition, the use of indicators and planning
activities will shape the topics and direction of the Regional. Framework Plan. We believe that this work
should be undertaken with MPAC in the first six months of 1995, to be completed and adopted in
conjunction with the Future Vision. Most of the changes required would be revisions to Goal II of the
RUGGOs.
illi~l III ISBN II III 'Iffil,
INNER I! I 'Jill 11
WIN Will! IN
/ i
/ irWON,
r•;'• /r r
Table of Contents
Introduction 2
Background Statement 3
Planning a Vision for the i ietro Area 5
Goal I: Regional Planning Pros 6
Objective 1: Citizen Participation 7
Objective 2: Metro Policy Advisory Committee 7
Objective 3: Applicability of RUGGOs 8
Objective 4: implementation Rules 10
Objective 5: Functional Planning Process 11
Objective 6: Future Vision 13
Objective 7: Amendments to RUGGO 14
Goal H: Urban Form 16
11. 1 NATURAL E %rV1RONME T 17
Objective 8: Water Resources 17
Objective 9: Air Quality 17
Objective 10: Natural Areas, Parks, and Wildlife habitat 18
Objective 11: Protection of Agricultural and Forest Resource Lands 19
11.2 BUILT ENVIRONIVIENT 21
Objective 12: housing 21
Objective 13: Public Services and Facilities 22
Objective 14: Transportation 23
Objective 15: Economic Opportunity 25
n.3 GROWTH MANAGEMENT 27
Objective 16: Urban/Rural Transition 27
Objective 17: Developed Urban Land 29
Objective 18: Urban Growth Boundary 31
Objective 19: Urban Design 32
HA GROWTH CONCEPT 34
Glossary 45
g11111, III
MINKE, ;
Introduction
The Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives (RUGGO) have been developed to:
1. respond to the direction given to Metro by the legislature through ORS ch 268.380 to
develop land use goals and objectives for the region which would replace those adopted by
the Columbia Region Association of Governments;
2. provide a policy framework for guiding Metro's regional planning program, principally its
development of functional plans and management of the region's urban growth boundary; and
3. provide a process for coordinating planning in the metropolitan area to maintain
metropolitan livability.
The RUGGO's are envisioned not as a final plan for the region, but as a starting point for
developing a more focused vision for the future growth and development of the Portland area.
Bence, the RUGGO's are the building blocks with which the local governments, citizens, and
other interests can begin to develop a shared view of the future.
This document begins with the broad outlines of that vision. There are two principal goals,
the first dealing with the planning process and the second outlining substantive concerns
related to urban form. The "subgoals" (in Goal II) and objectives clarify the goals. The
planning activities reflect priority actions that need to be taken at a later date to refine and
clarify the goals and objectives further.
Metro's regional goals and objectives r uiml b ORS 268.380(1) are in RUGGO Goals I
and II and Objectives 1-18 . nly. RUGGO planning activities
contain implementation ideas for future study in various stages of development that may or
may not lead to RUGGO amendments, new functional plans or functional plan amendments.
Functional plans and functional plan amendments shall be consistent with Metro's regional
goals and objectives,,,,,, not RUGGO planning activities.
f
111 12
ROM
IBM FAREMBEffm gym l~mm
Background Statement
Planning for and managing the effects of urban growth in this metropolitan region involves 24
cities, three counties; and more than 130 special service districts and school districts,
including Metro. In addition, the State of Oregon, Tri-Met, the Port of Pordand, and the
Boundary Commission all make decisions which affect and respond to regional urban growth.
Each of these jurisdictions and agencies has specific duties and powers which apply directly to
the tasks of urban growth management.
However, the issues of metropolitan growth are complex and inter-related. Consequently, the
planning and growth management activities of many jurisdictions are both affected by and
directly affect the actions of other jurisdictions in the region. In this region, as in others
throughout the country, coordination of planning and management activities is a central issue
for urban growth management.
Nonetheless, few models exist for coordinating growth management efforts in a metropolitan
region. Further, although the legislature charged Metro with certain coordinating
responsibilities, and gave it powers to accomplish that coordination, a participatory and
cooperative structure for responding to that charge has never been stated.
As urban growth in the region generates issues requiring a multi jurisdictional response, a
"blueprint" for regional planning and coordination is critically needed. Although most would
agree that there is a need for coordination, there is a wide range of opinion regarding how
regional planning to address issues of regional significance should occur, and under what
circumstances Metro should exercise its coordination powers.
Coal I addresses this coordination issue in the region for the first time by providing the
process that Metro will use to address areas and activities of metropolitan significance. The
process is intended to be responsive to the challenges of urban growth while respecting the
powers and responsibilities of a wide range of interests, jurisdictions, and agencies.
Goal U recognizes that this region is changing as growth occurs, and that change is
challenging our assumptions about how urban growth will affect quality of life. For example:
overall, the number of vehicle miles travelled in the region has been. increasing at a rate far
in excess of the rate of population and employment growth;
the greatest growth in traffic and movement is within suburban areas, rather than between
suburban areas and the central downtown disstriict;
rsx
r
W / /
I In
in the year 2010 Metro projects that 70% of all "trips" made daily in the region will
occur within suburban areas;
currently transit moves about 3 % of the travellers in the region on an average workday;
to this point the region has accommodated most forecasted growth on vacant land within
the urban growth boundary, with redevelopment expected to accommodate very little of
this growth;
single family residential construction is occurring at less than maximum planned density;
rural residential development in rural exception areas is occurring in a manner and at a
rate that may result in forcing the expansion of the urban growth boundary on important
agricultural and forest resource lands in the future;
a recent study of urban infrastructure needs in the state has found that only about half of
the faunding needed in the future to build needed facilities can be identified.
Add to this list growing citizen concern about rising housing costs, vanishing open space, and
increasing frustration with traffic congestion, and the issues associated with the growth of this
region are not at all different from those encountered in other west coast metropolitan areas
such as the Puget Sound region or cities in California. The lesson in these observations is
that the "quilt" of 27 separate comprehensive plans together with the region's urban growth
boundary is not enough to effectively deal with the dynamics of regional growth and maintain
quality of life.
The challenge is clear: if the Portland metropolitan area is going to be different than other
places, and if it is to preserve its vaunted quality of life as an additional 485,000 people move
into the urban area in the next 20 years, then a cooperative and participatory effort to address
the issues of growth must begin now. Further, that effort needs to deal with the issues
accompanying growth increasing traffic congestion, vanishing open space, speculative
pressure on rural farm lands, rising housing costs, diminishing environmental quality in a
common framework. Ignoring vital links between these issues will limit the scope and
effectiveness of our approach to managing urban growth.
Goal H provides that broad framework needed to address the issues accompanying urban
growth.
Voll
S .
MIEN
l
J
Planning for a Vision of Growth in the Portland Metropolitan Area
As the metropolitan area changes, the importance of coordinated and balanced planning
programs to protect the environment and guide development becomes increasingly evident.
By encouraging efficient placement of jobs and housing near each other, along with
supportive commercial and recreational uses, a more efficient development pattern will result.
An important step toward achieving this planned pattern of regional growth is the integration
of land uses with transportation planning, including mass transit, which will link together
mixed use urban centers of higher density residential and commercial development.
The region must strive to protect and enhance its natural environment and significant natural
resources. This can best be achieved by integrating the important aspects of the natural
environment into a regional system of natural areas, open space and trails for wildlife and
people. Special attention should be given to the development of infrastructure and public
services in a manner that complements the natural environment.
A clear distinction must be created between the urbanizing areas and rural lands. Emphasis
should be placed upon the balance between new development and infill within the region's
urban growth boundary and the need for future urban growth boundary expansion. This
regional vision recognizes the pivotal role played by a healthy and act.ive central city, while at
the same time providing for the growth of other communities of the region.
Finally, the regional planning program must be one that is based on a cooperative process that
involves the residents of the metropolitan area, as well as the many public and private
interests. Particular attention must be given to the need for effective partnerships with local
governments because they will have a major responsibility in implementing the vision. It is
important to consider.the diversity of the region's communities when integrating local
comprehensive plans into the pattern of regional growth.
3
MIS/z W941
GOAL, Is REGIONAL, PLANNING PROCESS
Regional planning in the metropolitan area shall:
~~°~'dent:.fy and designate other areas and activities of metro's litan ' .9fleanee
through a participatory process involving the
citie~ counties ial districts, school districts, and state and regional agencies
r
WP---occur in a cooperative manner in order to avoid creating duplicative processes,
standards, and/or governmental roles.
These goals and objectives shall only apply to ack howled ed comprehensive plans of cities
and counties when implemented through r nctional plans, or the
acknowledged urban growth boundary plan.
c
t; ,
Objective 1. Citizen. Participation
Metro shall develop and implement an ongoing program for citizen participation in all aspects
of the regional planning program. Such a program shall be coordinated with local programs
for supporting citizen involvement in planning processes, and shall not duplicate those
programs.
°~,°aal-Cite
Anvetvment a. Metro shall establish
k / to assist with the
Gemmiftee Bevel, ment, implementation and evaluation of its citizen involvement program and to advise
th Policy Advisory Committee regarding ways to best involve citizens in
regional planning activities.
1.2. Notification. Metro shall develop programs for public notification, especially for (but
not limited to) proposed legislative actions, that ensure a high level of awareness of potential
consequences as well as opportunities for involvement on the part of affected citizens, both
inside and outside of its district boundaries.
Objective 2 /;Metro Policy Advisory Committee
The 1992 Metro Charter has established the Metro Policy Advisory Committee to:
W -assist with the development and review of Metro's regional planning activities
pertaining to land use and growth mane ement, includin review and im I entation
;of these owls and objectives,
AI,
present and prospective functional planning, and management and
review of the region's urban growth boundary;
2.ii. serve as a forum for identifying and discussing areas and activities of metropolitan or
subregional significance; and
2-iii. provide an avenue for involving all cities and counties and other interests in the
development and implementation of growth management strategies.
2.1. Metro Policy Advisory Committee Composition. The initial Metro Policy Advisory
Committee (MPAC) shall be chosen according to the Metro Charter and, thereafter,
according to any changes approved by majorities of MPAC and the Metro Council. The
composition of the Committee shall reflect the partnership that must exist among
implementing jurisdictions in order to effectively address areas and activities of metropolitan
111 a
i i
sl canes.
1.
2.2. Advisory Committees. The Metro Council, or the Metro Policy Advisory Committee
consistent with the MPAC by-laws, shall appoint technical advisory committees as the
Council or the Metro Policy Advisory Committee determine a need for such bodies.
2.3. Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT). JPACT with the
Metro Council shall continue to perform the functions of the designated Metropolitan
Planning Organization as required by federal transportation planning regulations. JPACT and
the Metro Policy Advisory Committee shall develop a coordinated process, to be approved by
the Metro Council, to assure that regional land use and transportation planning remains
consistent with these goals and objectives and with each other.
Objective 3. Applicability of Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives
These Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives have been developed pursuant to OILS
268.380(1). Therefore, they comprise neither a com rehensive Ian under ORS 197.015(5)
nor a functional plan under ORS 268.390(2). functional
plans prepared by Metro shall be consistent with these goals and objectives. Metro°s
management of the Urban Growth Boundary shall be guided by standards and procedures
which must be consistent with these goals and objectives. These goals and objectives shall
not apply directly to site-specific land use actions, including amendments of the urban growth
boundary.
These Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives shall apply to adopted and acknowledged
comprehensive land use plans as follows:
,
may recommend or require amendments to adopted and acknowledged comprehensive
land use plans; or
3.ii. The management and periodic review of Metro's acknowledged Urban Growth
Boundary Plan, itself consistent with these goals and objectives, may require changes
in adopted and acknowledged land use plans; or
igpil
Mai
f~
3.iii. The Metro Policy Advisory Committee may identify and propose issues of regional
concern, related to or derived from these goals and objectives, for consideration by
cities and counties at the time of periodic review of their adopted and acknowledged
comprehensive plans.
3.1. Urban Growth Boundary Plan. The Urban Growth Boundary Plan has two
components:
3.1.1. The acknowledged urban growth boundary line; and
3.1.2. Acknowledged procedures and standards for amending the urban growth
boundary line. Metro's Urban Growth Boundary is not a regional comprehensive
plan but a provision of the comprehensive plans of the local governments within its
boundaries. The location of the urban growth boundary line shall be in compliance
with applicable statewide planning goals and consistent with these goals and objectives.
Amendments to the urban growth boundary line shall demonstrate consistency only
with the acknowledged procedures and standards.
3.2. Functional Planns W , I ; functional plans containing recommendations for
comprehensive planning by cities and counties may or may not involve land. use decisions.
Functional plans are not required by the enabling statute to include findings of consistency
with statewide land use planning goals. If provisions in a functional plan, or actions
implementing a functional plan require changes in an adopted and acknowledged
comprehensive land use plan, then that action may be a land use action required to be
consistent with the statewide planning goals.
3.
i
i
Periodic Review of Comprehensive Land Use Plans. At the time of periodic review
for comprehensive land use plans in the region the Metro Policy Advisory Committee:
3.3.1. Shall assist Metro with the identification wllff
functional plan provisions or changes in functional plans adopted since the last periodic
review for inclusion in periodic review notices as changes in law; and
3.3.2. May provide comments during the periodic review of adopted and
acknowledged comprehensive plans on issues of regional concern.
G
3. .4: Periodic Review of the Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives. ate
elsa~ gtges-emu
. . T'he Metro Policy Advisory Committee
shall consider the periodic review notice for these goals and objectives and recommend a
periodic review process for adoption by the Metro Council.
Objective 4. Implementation Roles
Regional planning and the implementation of these Regional Urban Growth Goals and
Objectives shall recognize the inter-relationships between cities, counties, special districts,
Metro, regional agencies, and the State, and their unique capabilities and roles.
4.1. Metro Role. Metro shall:
4.1.1. Identify and designate areas and activities of metropolitan significance;
4.1.2. Provide staff and technic°,al resources to support the activities of the4RegieEW
Policy Advisory Committee;
4.1.3. Serve as a technical resource for cities, counties, and other jurisdictions and
agencies;
4.1.4. Facilitate a broad-based regional discussion to identify appropriate strategies
for responding to those issues of metropolitan significance;. and
4.1.5. Adopt functional plans necessary and appropriate for the am lamentation of
these regional urban growth goals and objectives, 4.1.6. Coordinate the efforts of cities, counties, special distracts, and the state to
implement adopted strategies.
4.2. Bole of Cities.
4.2.1.E Adopt and amend comprehensive plans to conform to and functional plans
adopted by Metro; 1.
4.2.2. Identify potential areas and activities of metropolitan significance;
4.2.3. Cooperatively develop strategies for responding to designated areas and
activities of metropolitan significance; 49, 1
WIN
;s.
IN NI
4.2.4. Participate in the review and refinement of these goals and objectives.
4.3. Role of Counties.
4.3.1.; Adopt and amend comprehensive plans to conform functional plans adopted by
Metro;
4.3.2. Identify potential areas and activities of metropolitan significance;
4.3.3. Cooperatively develop strategies for responding to designated areas and
activities of metropolitan significance;
4.3.4. Participate in the review and refinement of these goals and objectives.
4.4. Role of Special Service Districts. Assist Metro with the identification of areas and
activities of metropolitan significance and the development of strategies to address them, and
participate in the review and refinement of these goals and objectives.
4.5. Role of the State of Oregon.10111
MONE 9/99 ON WIN
Advise MetF "a: g .x,^ idea flea a ..41 .,tea ..a -F metrrepolm.,,
r
€ iA -
Obje Live S. Functional Planning Process
Functional plans are limited purpose plans, consistent with these goals and ftctives which
address designated areas and activities of metropolitan ~€gea~
/r
5. 1. Existing Functional Plans. Metro shall continue to develop, amend, and implement,
with the assistance of cities, counties, special districts, and the state, statutorily required
functional plans for air, water, and transportation, as directed by ORS 263.390(1), and for
solid waste as mandated by ORS ch 459.
5.2. New Functional Playas. New functional plans shall be proposed from one of two
sources:
5.2.1. The Metro Policy Advisory Committee may recommend that the Metro
Council designate an area or activity of metropolitan significance for which a
functional plan should be prepared; or
5.2.2. The Metro Council may propose the preparation of a functional plan to
designate an area or activity of metropolitan significance, and refer that proposal to
the Metro Policy Advisory Committee. 'A ff
r/a/i U
pon the Metro Council adopting factual reasons for the development of a new functional
plan, the Metro Policy Advisory Committee shall participate in the preparation of the plan,
consistent with these goals and objectives and the reasons cited by the Metro Council. After
preparation of the plan and seeking broad public and local government consensus, using
existing citizen involvement processes established by cities, counties, and Metro, the Metro
Policy Advisory Committee shall review the plan and make a recommendation to the Metro
Council. The Metro Council may act to resolve conflicts or problems impeding the
development of a new functional plan and may complete the plan the Metro Policy Advisory
Committee is unable to complete its review in a timely manner.
The Metro Council shall hold a public hearing on the proposed plan and afterwards shall:
5.2.A. Adopt the proposed functional plan; or
5.2.R. Refer the proposed functional plan to the Metro Policy Advisory Committee in
order to consider amendments to the proposed plan prior to adoption; or
k
5.2.C. Amend and adopt the proposed functional plan; or.
5.2.13. Reject the proposal functional plan-NO
The proposed functional plan shall be adopted by ordinance, and shall include findings of
consistency with these goals and objectives.
5.3. Functional Plan Innplementation and Conflict Resolution. Adopted functional plans
shall be regionally coordinated policies, facilities, and/or approaches to addressing a
designated area or activity of metropolitan significance, to be considered by cities and
counties for incorporation in their comprehensive land use plans. If a city or county
determines that a functional plan recommendation should not or cannot be incorporated into
its comprehensive plan, then Metro shall review any apparent inconsistencies by the following
process:
5.3.1. Metro and affected local governments shall notify each other of apparent or
potential comprehensive plan'inconsistencies.
5.3.2. After Metro staff review, the Metro Policy Advisory Committee shall consult
the affected jurisdictions and attempt to resolve any apparent or potential
inconsistencies.
5.3.3. The Metro Policy Advisory Committee shall conduct a public hearing and
male a report to the Metro Council regarding instances and reasons why a city or
county has not adopted changes consistent with recommendations in a regional
functional plan.
5.3.4. The Metro Council shall review the Metro Policy Advisory Committee report
and hold a public hearing on any unresolved issues. The Council may decide to:
5.3.4.a. Amend the adopted regional functional plan; or
5.3.4.b. Initiate proceedings to require a comprehensive plan change; or
5.3.4.c. Find there is no inconsistency between the comprehensive plan(s) and
the functional plan.
Bill
n
gill,
s ,
i
/ O
Objective Y/6. Amendments to the Regional Urban Growth Coals and Objectives
The Regional Urban Growth Coals and Objectives shall be reviewed at regular intervals or at
other times determined by the Metro Council after consultation with or upon the suggestion of
the Metro Policy Advisory Committee. Any review and amendment process shall involve a
broad cross-section of citizen and jurisdictional interests„ and shall iwiolve the Metro Policy
Advisory Committee consistent with (foal 1: Regional Planning Process. Proposals for
amendments shall receive broad public and local government review prior to final Metro
Council action.
%/6. 1. Impact of Amendments. At the time of adoption of amendments to these pals and
objectives % e Metro Council shall determine whether amendments to adop
functional plans or the acknowledged regional urban growth boundary are
necessary. If amendments to the alcove are necessary, the Metro Council shall act on
amendments to applicable functional plans. The Council shall request recommendations from
the Metro Policy Advisory Committee before taking action. All amendment proposals will
include the date and method through which they may become effective, should they be
adopted. Amendments to the acknowledged regional urban growth boundary will be
y' considered under acknowledged urban growth boundary amendment procedures incorporated
in the Metro Code.
low
If changes j ' ~ ~ nctional plans are adopted, affected cities and
counties shall be informed in writing of those changes which are advisory in nature, those
which recommend changes in comprehensive land use plans,lwid those which require changes
in comprehensive plans. This notice shall specify the effective date of par`4icular amendment
provisions.
i ~O
.i ii
OGOAL Hs 1"AN FORM
'Me livability of the urban region should
be maintained and enhanced through initiatives
which:
Mi. re gve environmental quality;
Il.ii. coordianat~ the development of jobs, housing, and public services and facilities; and
H iii. inter-relate the benefits and consequences of growth in one part of the region with the
benefits and consequences of growth in another. Urban form, therefore, describes an overall
framework within which regional urban growth management can occur. Clearly stating
objectives for urban form, and pursuing them comprehensively provides the focal strategy for
rising to,the challenges posed by the growth trends present in the region today.
H. EN/ W/11
'XI W" ff////, If9411111
1: NATURAL ENVIRONN=
Preservation, use, and modification of the natural environment of the region should maintain
and enhance environmental quality white striving for the wise use and preservation of a broad
range of natural resources.
Objective Water Resources
Planning and management of water resources should be coordinated in order to improve the
quality and ensure sufficient quantity of surface water and groundwater available to the
region.
.1 'Fui--nulate Strategy. A long-term strategy, coordinated by the jurisdictions and
agencies charged with planning and managing water resources, shall be developed to comply
with state and federal requirements for drinking water, to sustain beneficial water uses, and to
accommodate growth.
Planning AcdWdes:
Planning programs for water resources management shall be evaluated to determine the ability
of current efforts to accomplish the following, and recommendations for changes in these
programs will be made if they are found to be inadequate:
Identify the future resource needs and carrying capacities of the region for municipal and
industrial water supply, irrigation, fisheries, recreation, wildlife, environmental standards
and aesthetic amenities;
Monitor water quality and quantity trends vis-a-vis beneficial use standards adopted by
federal, state, regional, and local governments for specific water resources important to
the region;
Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative water resource management scenarios, and
the use of conservation for both cost containment and resource management; and
Preserve, create, or enhance natural water features for use as elements in nonstructural
approaches to managing stormwater and water quality.
Objective 0,9. Air Quality
Wili SEEM 111111111111111E
i! I Al Ell
Air quality shall be protected and enhanced so that as growth occurs, human health is
unimpaired. Visibility of the Cascades and the Coast Mange from within the region should be
maintained.
.1. Strategies for planning and managing air quality in the regional airshed shall be
included in the State Implementation Plan for the Portland-Vancouver air quality maintenance
area as required by the Federal Clean Air Act.
8.2. New regional strategies shall be developed to comply with Federal Clean Air Act
requirements and provide capacity for future growth.
.3. The region, working with the state, shall pursue the consolidation of the Oregon and
Clark County Air Quality Management Areas.
.4. All functional plans, when taken in the aggregate, shall be consistent with the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality.
Planning Activities:
An air quality management plan should be developed for the regional airshed which:
Outlines existing and forecast air quality problems; identifies prudent and equitable market
based and regulatory strategies for addressing present and probable air quality problems
throughout the region; evaluates standards for visibility; and implements an air quality
monitoring program to assess compliance with local, state, and federal air quality
requirements.
Objecti® . Natural Areas, Parks and Wildlife Habitat
Sufficient open space in the urban region shall be acquired, or otherwise protected, and
managed to provide reasonable and convenient access to sites for passive and active
recreation. An open space system capable of sustaining or enhancing native wildlife and plant
populations should be established.
0.1. Quantifiable targets for setting aside certain amounts and types of open space shall be
identified.
D9.2. Corridor Systems - The regional planning process shall be used to coordinate the
development of interconnected recreational and wildlife corridors within the metropolitan
region.
0.2. 1. A, region-wide system of trails should be developed to link public and private
open space resources within and between jurisdictions.
M4.2.2. A, region-wide system of linked significant wildlife habitats should be
developed.
0.2.3. A. Willamette River Greenway Plan for the region should be implemented by the
turn of the century.
Ping Actinides:
1. Inventory existing open space and open space opportunities to determine areas within
the region where open space deficiencies exist now, or will in the future, given
adopted land use plans and growth trends.
2. Assess current and future active recreational land needs. Target acreage should be .
developed for neighborhood, community, and regional parks, as well as for other
types of open space in order to sheet local needs while sharing responsibility for
meeting metropolitan open space demands.
3. Develop multi jurisdictional tools for planning and financing the protection and
maintenance of open space resources. Particular attention will be paid to using the
land use planning and permitting process and to the possible development of a land-
banking program.
4. Conduct a detailed biological field inventory of the region to establish an accurate
baseline of native wildlife and plant populations. Target population goals for native
species will be established through a public process which will include an analysis of
amounts of habitat necessary to sustain native populations at target levels.
Objective . Protection of Agriculture and Forest Resource Lands
Agricultural and forest resource land outside the urban growth boundary shall be protected
from urbanization, and accounted for in regional economic acid development plans.
rAjN. Rural Resource Lands. Rural resource lands outside the urban growth boundary
which have significant resource value should actively be protected from urbanization.
UW.2. Urban Expansion. Expansion of the urban growth boon shall occur in u
reserves, established consistent with Objective 15.3.
Isms M-II =111111 1:
PlarWng AcdWdes:
A regional economic opportunities analysis shall include consideration of the agricultural and
forest products economy associated with lands adjacent to or near the urban area.
A
IMM,
e
MEMORIES WIN "M
A"I
H.2. BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Development in the region should occur in a coordinated and balanced fashion as evidenced
by:
11.21. a regional "fair-share" approach to meeting the housing needs of the urban
population;
I1.2.ii. the provision of infrastructure and critical public services concurrent with the pace of
urban growth;
H.2.iii. the integration of land use planning and economic development programs;
H.2.iv. the coordination of public investment with local comprehensive and regional
functional plans;
11.2.v. the continued evolution of regional economic opportunity; and
YY.2.vi. the creation of a balanced transportation system, less dependent on the private
automobile, supported by both the use of emerging technology and the collocation of jobs,
housing, commercial activity, parks and open space.
Objective #44. Housing
There shall be a diverse range of housing types available inside the urban growth boundary
(UGB) for rent or purchase at costs in balance with the range of household incomes in the
region. Low and moderate income housing needs should be addressed throughout the region.
Housing densities should be supportive of adopted public policy for the development of the
regional transportation system and designated mixed use urban centers.
Planning Activities:
The Metropolitan Housing Rule (OAR 660, Division 7) has effectively resulted in the
preparation of local comprehensive plans in the urban region that:
provide for the sharing of regional housing supply responsibilities by ensuring the
presence of single and multiple family zoning in every jurisdiction; and
plan for local residential housing densities that support net residential housing density
NMI
.WJ MI i , M
we
assumptions underlying the regional urban growth boundary.
However, it is now time to develop a new regional housing policy that directly addresses the
requirements of Statewide Planning Coal 10, in particular:
1. Strategies should be developed to preserve the region's supply of special needs and
existing low and moderate income housing.
2. Diverse Housing Needs. the diverse housing needs of the present and projected
population of the region shall be correlated with the available and prospective housing
supply. Upon identification of unmet housing needs, a region wide strategy shall be
developed which takes into account subregional opportunities and constraints, and the
relationship of market dynamics to the management of the overall supply of housing. In
addition, that strategy shall address the "fair-share" distribution of housing responsibilities
among the jurisdictions of the region, including the provision of supporting social services.
3. Housing affordability. A housing needs analysis shall be carried out to assess the
adequacy of the supply of housing for rent and/or sale at prices for low and moderate income
households. If, following that needs analysis, certain income groups in the region are found
to not have affordable housing available to them, strategies shall be developed to focus land
use policy and public and private investment towards meeting that need.
4. The uses of public policy and investment to encourage the development of housing in
locations near employment that is affordable to employees in those enterprises shall be
evaluated and, where feasible, implemented.
Objective 0,U. Public Services and Facilities
Public services and facilities including but not limited to public safety, water and sewerage
systems, parks, libraries, the solid waste management system, stormwater management
facilities, and transportation should be planned and developed to:
.i. minimize cost;
0,4-2.ii. maximize service efficiencies and coordination;
iii. result in net improvements in environmental quality and the conmrvation of natural
resources;
.iv. keep pace with growth while preventing any loss of existing scTvice levels and
IN, I
E IS '!ii i
F r, '
achieving planned service levels;
MON. use energy efficiently; and
%2.vi. shape and direct growth to meet local and regional objectives.
42.1. Planning Area. The long-term geographimd planning area for the provision of
urban services shall be the area described by the adopted and acknowledged urban growth
boundary and the designated urban reserves.
9,42.2. Forest Need. Public service and facility development shall be planned to
accommodate the rate of urban growth fore-cast in the adopted regional growth forecast,
including anticipated expansions into urban reserve areas.
W2.3. Timing. The region should seek the provision of public facilities and services at the
time of new urban growth.
Planning Activities:
Inventory current and projected public facilities and services needs throughout the region, as
described in adopted and acknowledged public facilities plans. Identify opportunities for and
barriers to achieving concurrency in the region. Develop financial tools and techniques to
enable cities, counties, school districts, special districts, Metro and the State to secure the
funds necessary to achieve concurrency. Develop tools and strategies for better linking
planning for school, library, and park facilities to the land use planning process.'
Objective W3. Transportation
A regional transportation system shall be developed which:
BOA. reduces reliance on a single mode of transportation through development of a
balanced transportation system which employs highways, transit, bicycle and pedestrian
improvements, and system and demand management.
.ii. provides adequate levels of mobility consistent with local comprehensive plans and
state and regional policies and plans;
.iii. encourages energy efficiency;
.iv. recognizes financial constraints; and
MENEM
MAN 111
WIN. minimizes the environmental impacts of system development, operations, and
maintenance.
W.I. System Priorities. in developing new regional transportation system infrastructure,
the highest priority should be meeting the mobility needs of mixed use urban centers, when
designated. Such needs, associated with ensuring access to jobs, housing, and shopping
within and among those centers, should be assessed and met through a combination of
intensifying land uses and increasing transportation system capacity so as to minimize
negative impacts on environmental quality, urban form, and urban design.
3.2. Environmental Considerations. Planning for the regional transportation system
should seek to:
3.2.1. reduce the region's transportation-related energy consumption through
increased use of transit, carpools, vanpools, bicycles and walking;
W.2.2. maintain the region's air quality (see Objective S: Air Quality); and
W,.2.3. reduce negative impacts on parks, public open space, wetlands, and negative
effects on communities and neighborhoods arising from noise, visual impacts, and
physical segmentation.
W,.3. Transportation Balance. AiFhough the predominant form of transportation is the
private automobile, planning for and development of the regional transportation system should
seek to:
W.3.1. reduce automobile dependency, especially the use of single-occupancy vehicles;
9,14.3.2. increase the use of transit through both expanding transit service and
addressing a broad range of requirements for making transit competitive with the private
automobile; and
W.3.3. encourage bicycle and pedestrian movement through the location and design of
land uses.
Planning Activities:
1. Build on existing mechanisms for coordinating transportation planning in the region
by:
identifying the role for local transportation system provements and relationship
SPIN I
I~gg
between local, regional, and state transportation system improvements in regional
transportation plans;
clarifying institutional roles, especially for plan implementation, m local, regional, and
state transportation plans; and
including plans and policies for the inter-regional movement of people and goods by
rail, ship, barge, and air in regional transportation plans.
2. Structural barriers to mobility for transportation disadvantaged populations should be
assessed in the current and planned regional transportation system and addressed
through a comprehensive program of transportation and non-transportation system
based actions.
3. The needs for movement of goods via trucks, rail, and barge should be assessed and
addressed through a coordinated program of transportation system improvements and
actions to affect the location of trip generating activities.
4. Transportation-related guidelines and standards for designating mixed use urban
centers shall be developed.
Objective WN,4. Economic Opportunity
Public policy should encourage the development of a diverse and sufficient supply of jobs,
especially family wage jobs, in appropriate locations throughout the region. Expansions of
the urban growth boundary for industrial or commercial purposes shall occur in locations
consistent with these regional urban growth goals and objectives.
Planning :Activities:
1. Regional and subregional economic opportunities analyses, as described in OAR 660
Division 9, should be conducted to:
assess the adequacy and, if necessary, propose modifications to the supply of vacant and
redevelopable land inventories designated for a broad range of employment activities;
identify regional and subregional target industries. Economic subregions will be
developed which reflect a functional relationship between locational characteristics and the
locational requirements of target industries. Enterprises identified for recruitment,
retention, and expansion should be basic industries that broaden and diversify the region's
ail hi-MMIN, U,
011 11'
//i
economic base while providing jobs that pay at fancily wage levels or better; and
link job development efforts with an active and comprehensive program of training and
education to improve the overall duality of the region's labor force. In particular, new
strategies to provide labor training and education should focus on the needs of
economically disadvantaged, minority, and elderly populations.
2. An assessment should be made of the potential for redevelopment and/or intensification of
use of existing commercial and industrial land resources in the region.
III gg 11,
111:111111 11~11101111 11101, TIMOR pa I!
,
WA/WON, ! , X4 ~,I'xo
.
11.1 GROWTH MANAGEbMNT
The management of the urban land supply shall occur in a manner which encourages:
H.3.i. the evolution of an efficient urban growth form which reduces sprawl;
U.3.ii. a clear distinction between urban and rural lands; and
H.3.iii. recognition of the inter-relationship between development of vacant land and
redevelopment objectives in all parts of the urban region.
Objective M5. Urban/rural transition
There should be a clear transition between urban and rural land that makes best use of natural
and built landscape features and which recognizes the likely long-term prospects for regional
19 urban growth.
'~.1. Boundary Features. The Metro urban growth boundary should be located using
natural and built features, including roads, drainage divides, floodplains, powerlines, major
topographic features, and historic patterns of land use or settlement.
015.2. Sense of Place. Historic, cultural, topographic, and biological features of the
regional landscape which contribute significantly to this region's identity and "sense of
place", shall be identified. Management of the total urban land supply should occur in a
manner that supports the preservation of those features, when designated, as growth occurs.
W.3. Urban ]Reserves. Thirty-year "urban reserves", adopted for purposes of
coordinating planning and estimating areas for future urban expansion, should be identified
consistent with these goals and objectives, and reviewed by Metro every 15 years.
~D,U.3.1. Establishment of urban reserves will take into account:
9,14.3.1.a. The efficiency with which the proposed. reserve can be provided with
urban services in the future;
~W, 3.1.b. The unique land needs of specific urban activities assessed from a
regional perspective;
#,.M.3.1.c. The provision of green spaces between communities;
r ,
IRAN
09.3.1.d. The efficiencies with which the proposed reserve can be urbanized;
,W.3.1.e. The proximity of jobs and housing to each other;
W-3.1.L The balance of growth opportunities throughout the region so that the
costs and benefits can be shared;
U4.3. 1.g. The impact on the regional transportation system; and
W,3.11. The protection of farm and forest resource lands from urbanization.
Inclusion of land in an urban reserve shall be preceded by consideration of all of the
above factors.
5.3.2 In addressing .3.1(h), the following hierarchy should be used for
identifying priority sites for urban reserves:
W.3.2.a. First, propose such reserves on rural lands excepted from Statewide
Planning goals 3 and 4 in adopted and acknowledged county comprehensive plans.
This recognizes that small amounts of rural resource land adjacent to or surrounded by
those "exception lands" may be necessary for inclusion in the proposal to improve the
efficiency of the future urban growth boundary amendment.
W.3.2.b. Second, consider secondary forest resource lands, or equivalent, as
defined by the state.
W.3.2.c. Third, consider secondary agricultural resource lands, or equivalent, as
defined by the state.
U4.3.2.d. Fourth, consider primary forest resource lands, or equivalent, as defined
by the state.
W ,.3.2.e. Finally, when all other options are exhausted, consider primary
agricultural lands, or equivalent, as defined by the state.
W.3.3. Expansion of the urban growth boundary shall occur consistent with Objectives
11and 107. Where urban land is adjacent to rural lands outside of an urban reserve,
Metro will work with affected cities and counties to ensure that urban uses do not
significantly affect the use or condition of the rural land. Where urban land is adjacent to
lands within an urban reserve that may someday be included within the urban growth
boundary,', Metro will work with affected cities and counties to ensure that rural
development does not create obstacles to efficient urbanization in the future. ,
i ~ffiffio r / , ivm r r
ng AcllVides:
Plmd
1. Identification of urban reserves adjacent to the urban growth boundary shall be
accompanied by the development of a generalized future land use plan. The planning
effort will primarily be concerned with identifying and protecting future open space
resources and the development of short-term strategies needed to preserve future
urbanization potential. Ultimate providers of urban services within those areas should
be designated and charged with incorporating the reserve area(s) in their public facility
plans in conjunction with the next periodic review. Changes in the location of the
urban growth boundary should occur so as to ensure that plans exist for key public
facilities and services.
2. The prospect of creating transportation and other links between the urban economy
within the Metro Urban Growth Boundary and other urban areas in the state should be
investigated as a means for better utilizing Oregon's urban land and human resources.
3. The use of greenbelts for creating a clear distinction between urban and rural lands,
and for creating linkages between communities, should be explored.
4. The region, working with the state and other urban communities in the northern Willamette Valley, should evaluate the opportunities for accommodating forecasted
urban growth in urban arias outside of and not adjacent to the present urban growth
boundary.
Objective . Developed Urban lAnd
Opportunities for and obstacles to the continued development and redevelopment of existing
urban land shall be identified and actively addressed. A combination of regulations and
incentives shall be employed to ensure that the prospect of living, working, and doing
business in those locations remains attractive to a wide range of households and employers.
Pt& 1. Redevelopment 1& Infill. The potential for redevelopment and infill on existing
urban land will be included as an element when calculating the buildable land supply in the
region, where it can be demonstrated that the infill and redevelopment can be reasonably
expected to occur during the next 20 years. When Metro examines whether additional url?an
land is needed within the urban growth boundary, it shall assess redevelopment and infill
potential in the region.
Metro will work with jurisdictions in the region to determine the extent to which
redevelopment and infill can be relied on to meet the identified need for additional urban
t
III ME: 11m,
1 1111 i -0
a,
i ES , , v
/ /4//,Y" . NOW
land. After this analysis and review, Metro will initiate an amendment of the urban growth
boundary to meet that portion of the identified need for land not met through commitments
for redevelopment and infill.
.2. Portend Central City. The Central City area of Portland is an area of regional
and state significance for commercial, economic, cultural, tourism, government, and
transportation functions. State and regional policy and public investment should continue to
recognize this special significance.
06.3. Mixed Use Urban Centers. The region shall evaluate and designate mixed use
urban centers. A "mixed use urban center" is a mixed use node of relatively high density,
supportive of non-auto based transportation modes, and supported by sufficient public
facilities and services, parks, open space, and other urban amenities. Upon identification of
mixed use urban centers, state, regional, and local policy and investment shall be coordinated
to achieve development objectives for those places. Minimum targets for transit:highway
mode split, jobs:housing balance, and minimum housing density may be associated with those
public investments.
New mixed use urban centers shall be sited with respect to a system of such centers in the
region, and shall not significantly affect regional goals for existing centers, the transportation
system, and other public services and facilities.
Plcart dng Activities:
1. Metro's assessment of redevelopment and infill potential in the region shall include but not
be limited to:
a. An inventory of parcels where the assessed value of improvements is less than the
assessed value of the land.
b. An analysis of the difference between comprehensive plan development densities and
actual development densities for all parcels as a first step towards determining the
efficiency with which urban land is being used. In this case, efficiency is a function
of land development densities incorporated in local comprehensive plans.
c. An assessment of the impacts on the cost of housing of redevelopment versus
expansion of the urban growth boundary.
d. An assessment of the impediments to redevelopment and infdl posed by existing urban
land uses or conditions.
2. Financial incentives to encourage redevelopment and infill consistent with adopted and
ENE=
acknowledged comprehensive plans should be pursued to make redevelopment and infill
attractive alternatives to raw land conversion for investors and buyers.
3. Cities and their neighborhoods should be recognized as the focal points for this region's
urban diversity. Actions should be identified to reinforce the vole of existing downtowns
in maintaining the strength of urban communities.
4. Tools will be developed to address regional economic equity issues stemming from the
fact that not all jurisdictions will serve as a site for an economic activity center. Such
tools may include off-site linkage programs to meet housing or other needs or a program
of fiscal tax equity.
5. Criteria shall be developed to guide the potential designation of mixed use urban centers.
The development and application of such criteria will address the specific area to be
included in the center, the type and amount of uses it is to eventually contain, the steps to
be taken to encourage public and private investment. Existing and possible future mixed
use urban centers will be evaluated as to their current functions, potentials, and need for
future public and private investment. Strategies to meet the needs of the individual
centers will be developed. The implications of both limiting and not limiting the location
of large scale office and retail development in mixed use urban centers shall be evaluated.
Objective &7. Urban Growth Boundary
The regional urban growth boundary, a long-term planning tool, shall separate urbanizable
from rural land, be based in aggregate on the region's 20-year projected need for urban land,
and be located consistent with statewide planning goals and these Regional Urban Growth
Goals and Objectives. In the location, amendment, and management of the regional urban
s t_1f t- imeweva the fu-netion l ~r~lno ^f tl,n 1+r+a.me...
growth boundary, Mea`.~o swan swk Y.- .~v..v..,.. wv W . undaj y.
'§P. 1. Expansion into Urban Reserves. Upon demonstrating a need for additional urban
land, major and legislative urban growth boundary amendments shall only occur within urban
reserves unless it can be demonstrated that Statewide Planning Goal 14 cannot be met for the
urban region through use of urban reserve lands.
&7.2. Urban Growth Boundary Amendment Process. Criteria for amending the urban
growth boundary shall be derived from statewide planning goals 2 and 14 and relevant
portions of the Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives.
;x.2.1. Major Amendments. Proposals for major amendment of the UGB shall be
made primarily through a legislative process in conjunc`ition with the development and
i
r/w
/ WRI
adoption of regional forecasts for population and employment growth. The amendment
process will be initiated by a Metro finding of need, and involve local governments,
special districts, citizens, and other interests.
.2.2. l tional Adjustments. Locational adjustments of the IJGB shall be
brought to Metro by cities, counties, and/or property owners based on public facility plans
in adopted and aclmowledged comprehensive plans.
Objective ON. Urban Design
The identity and functioning of communities in the region shall be supported through:
~ 9J. the recognition and protection of critical open space features in the region;
public policies which encourage diversity and excellence in the design and
development of settlement patterns, landscapes, and structures; and
.iii. ensuring that incentives and regulations guiding the development and redevelopment
of the urban area promote a settlement pattern which:
, .iii.a. is pedestrian "friendly" and reduces auto dependence;
FJS.iii.b. encourages transit use;
W.iii.c. reinforces nodal, mixed use, neighborhood oriented design;
'l✓
,U.iii.d. includes concentrated, high density, mixed use urban centers developed in
relation to the region's transit system; and
is responsive to needs for privacy, community, and personal safety in an
urban setting.
jkg. Pedestrian and transit supportive building patterns will be encouraged in order to
minimize the need for auto trips and to create a development pattern conducive to face-to-
face community interaction.
Planting Activities:
1. A regionai landscape analysis shall be undertaken to inventory and analyze the
relationship between the built and natural environments and to identify key open space,
loll
X "W,
M Now
i
topographic, natural resource, cultural, and architectural features which should be
protected or provided as urban growth occurs.
2. Model guidelines and standards shall be developed which expand the range of tools
available to jurisdictions for accommodating change in ways compatible with
neighborhoods and communities while addressing this objective.
3. Light rail transit stops, bus stops, transit routes, and transit centers leading to and
within mixed use urban centers shall be planned to encourage pedestrian use and the
creation of mixed use, high density residential development.
r
/ r
r
r r ~ r
!!lU//////.l%//////!////////.•'//L//////.!(///"!U//////////!(//!!l///////!!!//,%//////•%U/////!!!////////////////////////////////iiii~~iii~~~i~~~~~~ viiiii vii rami vriri vriiii riiivviiiiiiiaiiiiiiiiiiiviviiiiiiia//iiiii.
/
/ r
/ r / n r r ui , , r
, , ,i r . r rr
IN -NWIM-All
YAM;
s.
MINIS ilI 11111
min=
WAN MEMO', Noffift",
,
~IRPRR,Wllll 11%
111011 ~
/
,
r
rb
I Ma
WOMEN
/
Sri r ~ / / r i r / ~ ,
,
r
•r
/
/
/
/
~i
:EWE= llllili~
ii
r ~ / iii / ~
r
i
r
Wgl:
i . .
r
526
a
i
/
I,
Rkm
/
/ /
i / I
oil
g
7 -
/
/
r '
s
S
IFE
11 1 111 IM
, m/ / . . I/1!//.
Y
~ Y
/ I
• •i 4i
j /
/1 I / / , I r / r
/
Arm
Wfffffffl'l ~41,
/
n -
rt
G
GII,
WAIN I
V, e
r i
W/r
/ r
r ,
i
ONE M®RE/, ON' PRO
/
/
• a4
N; RNTR
Jill
'A
ISO"
/
/
x
r
N
Y rQ
4
i
GLOSSARY
Areas and Activities of Metropolitan S eauee ~ A program, area or activity,
having significant impact upon the orderly and responsible development of the metropolitan area
that can benefit from a coordinated multi-jurisdictional response under ORS 268.390.
Beneficial Use Standards. Under Oregon law, specific uses of water within a drainage basin
deemed to be important to the ecology of that basin as well as to the needs of local communities
are designated as "beneficial uses". Fence, "beneficial use standards" are adopted to preserve
water quality or quantity necessary to sustain the identified beneficial uses.
Economic Opportunities Analysis. An "economic opportunities analysis" is a strategic
assessment of the likely trends for growth of local economies in the state consistent with OAR
660-09-015. Such an analysis is critical for economic planning and for ensuring that the land
supply in an urban area will meet long-term employment growth needs.
Exception. An "exception" is taken for land when either commitments for use, current uses,
or other reasons make it impossible to meet the requirements of one or a number of the statewide
planning goals. Hence, lands "excepted" from statewide planning goals 3 (Agricultural Lands)
and 4 (Forest Lands) have been determined to be unable to comply with the strict resource
protection requirements of those goals, and are thereby able to be used for other than rural
resource production purposes. Lands not excepted from statewide planning goals 3 and 4 are to
be used for agricultural or forest product purposes, and other, adjacent uses must support their
continued resource productivity.
Family Wage Job. A permanent job with an annual income greater than or equal to the average
annual covered wage in the region. The most current average annual covered wage information
from the Oregon Employment Division shall be used to determine the family wage job rate for
the region or for counties within the region.
Fiscal Tax Equity. The process by which inter jurisdictional fiscal disparities can be addressed
through a partial redistribution of the revenue gained from economic wealth, particularly the
,yI increment gained through economic growth.
Functional Ilan. A limited purpose multi-jurisdictional plan for an area or activity having
/o'
, /Yzg/r ON
NE , ,
significant district-wide impact upon the orderly and responsible development of the metropolitan
area that serves as a guideline for local comprehensive plans consistent with ORS 268.390.
~ , ry
Housing Affordability. The availability of housing such that no more than 30% (an index
derived from federal, state, and local housing agencies) of the monthly income of the household
need be spent on shelter.
Infill. New development on a parcel or parcels of less than one contiguous acre located within
the urban growth boundary.
Infrastructure. Roads, water systems, sewage systems,l~ /
€e -stermdrainag ' bridges, and other facilities developed to support the functioning of the
developed portions of the environment.
/
Rey or Critical Public Facilities and Services. Basic facilities that are primarily planned for
by local government but which also may be provided by private enterprise and are essential to
the support of more intensive development, including transportation, water supply, sewage,
parks, and solid waste disposal.
Loral Comprehensive Plan. A generalized, coordinated land use map and policy statement of
the governing body of a city or county that inter-relates all functional and natural systems and
activities related to the use of land, consistent with state law.
Metropolitan Rousing Rule. A rule (OAR 660, Division 7) adopted by the Land Conservation
and Development Commission to assure opportunity for the provision of adequate numbers of
needed housing units and the efficient use of land within the M, etro Urban Growth Boundary.
This rule establishes minimum overall net• residential densities for all cities and counties within
F
„
the urban growth boundary, and specifies that 50% of the land set aside for new residential
development be zoned for multifamily housing. 0, IN WA
me/a/ 01101,00M W/90~~ ME W~
.y
"Now.
/
YT B.. b A oe -.9 7..... ~..t d~ana~5
~j -~II'~iBY"`~1GIDIT~GIIT~S'i' • .y6T~'S'L9L~C' ~Pi7ii4T+~i7~4i-'°~''nb-a'
pe-
=o+ag 9 !
elmffiflts
• 9 !
leesli
state implementation Flan. A, plan for ensuring that all parts of Oregon remain in compliance
with Federal air duality standards.
/ / • / / J///!%/ M.1;
r,r
/ ME
rwww/ .~19~i9lT,Jji~~ Ly773YY~'liJ~i3~iJy
. ff-S
Urban Form. The net result of efforts to Mmr-ve environmental quality, coordinate the
development of jobs, housing, and public services and facilities, and inter-relate the benefits and
consequences of growth in one part of the region with the benefits and consequences of growth
in another. Urban form, therefore, describes an overall framework within which regional urban
growth management can occur. Clearly stating objectives for urban form, and pursuing them
comprehensively provides the focal strategy for rising to the challenges posed by the growth
_ trends present in the region today.
Urban Growth Boundary. A boundary which identifies urban and urbanizable lands needed
during the 20- ear anninfl, riod to be lanned and serviced to su rt urban development
densities, /
An area adjacent to the present urban growth boundary defined to be a priority
location for any future urban growth boundary amendments when needed. Urban reserves are
intended to provide cities, counties, other service providers, and both urban and rural land
owners with a greater degree of certainty regarding future regional urban form. Whereas the
urban growth boundary describes an area needed to accommodate the urban wth forecasted
over a twee ear riod,~ / /
ARE
ON
R
Al R,
G bA fM1 <C C
',e. 's Y. x ti r cat r y+-'
t - t ~ n t x a`~:1t . ' o5-w, h."cl l a ,C
Jp, ' t~ t ~ a i 1"'' s ~j '~y.,t-r ';e>A• Js
.i: ~ ci z~, r r L4 ~ ~a 1+. ~ rye a r e
Lf ~~r x'ax _ ~ '.v -f~..~'' b y^t! 2 rwy'i.= t
Ci ~ sYholo 9 ~•7 .C
~ a
r • 1,
.'':t~:t~ n e n
L E G E 1V
C..Uw uty y
',p~ K-d k Vd ins Ught
R.gk-I Centro Lay' Rupasd 14ht Roil Algn
'lb- (lent- np ro-tw MCI- Lire - -
C-...Lrl Nude. I>Sht Rail SM-km M,r•
Inn. N4ghb-l d. n;riiw Fxl°aee W. flee • J`
Outar Neghbothwde l',b.n Ro.avc Study Ma
Mh".L. kmployment UN- ~ It-I K-.
lnd-W Mau ' .at Open Spas
«7 A
C'arida•.n ~ l.rhun C:rooth R°undan• /
Mrln 5e EM NeiShb, ins Citire be
Gteen [brrid= publk ILIA,
0 45M sow Is= 240M 76000
_ nL
V• I •
REGION
J• ' l"`r~I ~ •f r' ~y p 6
J Clark County 1
, ° r• Urban Growth Area DeclVmuforTWXrm v
ror
r
Executive Officer Recommendation
2040 Growth Concept
MCTRO
IST
e~
s I 'aa
t
c
p° P pvrsroa _ ar J J
4
Y \ V S l
0
,1+=,tl _ 1 ~ s (Ym. "i•C). ? i ~ x ~M1 4 ~ ~ .
` rx fM
p\ ~ " . L .+..1 1 WOO tf
alt + C
- I .
a
AGENDA ITEM
For Agenda of 11/ 22/94
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Update Buildin.a Use Policies
PREPARED BY: N. Robinson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Shall the City Council adopt an updated building use policy outlining room
reservation procedures, room use guidelines, and setting forth fees and
deposits?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the updated Policies and Procedures for Reserving City of Tigard
Meeting Rooms.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Town Hall. Room and most conference rooms are currently available to the
public, by reservation, under an interim Building Use Policy established in
1987. The present policy does not require deposits and does not charge fees
for room use. In addition, there is no limitation on how the rooms are used.
Over the years we have experienced some damage to facilities from public use.
We also are currently allowing a variety of uses of City facilities some of
which benefit non-Tigard residents and some of which benefit for-profit
businesses.
The updated policy is based on the assumption that room use should be free of
charge to non-profit organizations and Tigard citizens and that those wishing
to use facilities for a profit venture or those from outside Tigard should be
charged a fee. In addition, refundable deposits should be collected to cover
the costs of clean up or repairs for functions such as parties, receptions,
and potlucks which typically involve food and beverages.
The updated policy encourages the continued use of the City facilities by
Tigard taxpayers and non-profit organizations and generally discourages use
by others. The collection of deposits will ensure that any damage to
facilities will be repaired at user's cost, so that facilities can continue
to be made available for public use.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Continue interim use policy currently in effect.
2. Adopt updated policy as proposed.
3. Amend proposal, then adopt.
FISCAL NOTES
Fees from room use are anticipated to amount to less than $1000.00 annually.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 94--
A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
FOR RESERVING CITY OF TIGARD MEETING ROOMS, ESTABLISHING FEES AND
DEPOSITS, AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard allows private, non-profit, and public use
of City meeting rooms; and
WHEREAS, use of the meeting rooms is increasing making clarification of
the room use policy necessary; and
WHEREAS, the effective date for the implementation of the updated
policies, procedures, fees and deposits is January 1, 1995.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
Section 1: The Policies and Procedures for Reserving City of Tigard
Meeting Rooms, shown as "Exhibit A," which outlines
meeting room fees and deposits is adopted.
Section 2: This resolution shall be effective on and after the first
day of January, 1995.
PASSED: This day of 1994.
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
Page 1 a
11 11, 1:11 5
.'Exhibit A"°
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR RESERVING
CITY OF TIGARD MEETING ROOMS
a
dw.
Making a Reservation
CITY OF TIGARD
• All reservations require that a City of Tigard Room Use
application be completed. OE
• Applications must be submitted at least seven (7) days
prior to the desired reservation date. Room use fees
and security deposits are payable at the time of
application.
° Applicants must be 21 years of age or older.
Reservation Periods
Meeting rooms are available for reservation Monday through Sunday - 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Group Classifications
For.purposes of scheduling reservations and determining fees, groups are classified as follows:
Class 1. City Business & Governmental Agencies
Class 2: Non-profit organizations or Tigard resident
A resident is defined as:
A person who resides, or owns property, within the city limits of Tigard.
A business whose office is located within the city limits of Tigard.
• Resident status is extended to those served by the Tigard Water Department
for the purposes of reserving the Water Department rooms.
Class 3: Profit events by a Tigard resident.
A profit event is one that promotes a for-profit business.
Class 4: General Public (Private and profit organizations based outside of Tigard)
Priority for room use is given to class categories in ascending order beginning with Class 1. All
efforts will be made to keep the room schedule intact, once reservations are made; however, the
City retains the right to cancel or relocate a meeting upon 24 hours notice.
Meeting Rooms Available and Room Rental Fees:
Room Capacity Class 1 and 2 Class 3 Class 4
Town Hall Room 90 No fee $20.00 p/hr $25.00 p/hr
Town Hall Conference
Room 20 No fee $10.00 p/hr $15.00 p/hr
Richard M. (Dick)
Brown Auditorium 150 No fee $20.00 p/hr $25.00 p/hr
Water Department
Conference Room. 2 No fee $10.00 p/hr $15:00 p/hr
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard. OR 97223 (503) 639-417.1 TDD, (503) 684-2772
11 1 MIN
lig
Cleaning/Security Deposit
A cleaning/security deposit is required for parties, receptions, and potlucks. The deposit must be
paid seven (7) days in advance of your event. The cleaning/security deposit is as follows:
Groups of 80 or less - $150.00 Groups of more than 80 - $250.00
The cleaning/security deposit will be returned under the following conditions:
a. The room is left clean and the furniture is in the original configuration;
b. The room is left undamaged;
C. The room is vacated at the scheduled time; and
d. The key and "Checklist for Meeting Room Users" are turned in to the Police Department.
The Administrative Services Manager will determine the amount of the cleaning/security deposit to
be refunded based on the Checklist and input from staff. If any of the deposit is kept by the City
a breakdown of how the deposit was used will be provided to the user. The Room Reservation
Coordinator will submit a refund request to the Accounting Division within five working days of the
event or when cleaning or repairs are complete.
General Information
The City is pleased to make meeting rooms available to the general public. Please help us continue
to offer this service by following these guidelines:
1. The person responsible for the group should make the reservation and be in attendance at
the function or designate a responsible substitute to assume responsibility for supervision of
the function.
2. Functions occurring in rooms must not violate any City ordinance or state statute.
3. Activities must not be disruptive to others present in the building.
4. Tables and chairs are supplied. The Town Hall and Water Department [Richard M. (Dick)
Brown] Auditorium have overhead projector screens that may be used. Other office
equipment and supplies, including telephones, copy machines, typewriters, coffee makers,
and supplies, are not available to users. Public telephones are located in the Police
Department lobby and Mater Dept. lobby.
5. Smoking is prohibited in any location inside the building.
6. Alcohol is not permitted in or on the premises of the City buildings.
Cancellations
All efforts will be made to keep the room schedule intact, once reservations are made; however, the
City retains the right to cancel or relocate a meeting upon 24 hours notice.
If you cancel your meeting, please notify the Room Reservation Coordinator.
Mailing Address
The application, room use fee, and cleaning/security deposit may be mailed, or delivered, to the City
of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 87223. If you have any questions, please contact the
Room Reservation Coordinator at 638-4171.
AGENDA ITEM #
For Agenda of 11/22/94
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Update Tigard Senior Center Room Use Policies
PREPARED BY: N. Robinson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Shall the City Council adopt an updated room use policy for the Tigard Senior
Center outlining room reservation procedures, room use guidelines, and
setting forth fees and deposits?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the updated Tigard Senior Center Room Use Policies and Rental
Procedures.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Tigard Senior Center is currently available for rental, by reservation,
under an interim policy established in 1990. Reservations for functions
outside the Senior Center regular hours primarily fall under the "non-profit
organizations and Tigard residents" classification.
The present policy allows for a room rental fee dependant on the
classification a user falls under. The updated policy clarifies user's
responsibilities and updates room rental fees. The fee schedule continues to
allow free use by Loaves and Fishes, City business, and governmental
agencies. Tigard resident no profit functions and non-profit organizations
pay the lowest rental fee and non-residents pay the highest fee. .
The Senior Center has experienced some damage from public use. Requiring a
refundable deposit will ensure that any damage to the facility will be
repaired at the user's expense.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED -
1. Continue interim use policy currently in effect.
2. Adopt updated policy as proposed.
3. Amend proposal, then adopt.
FISCAL NOTES
Fees from room use are anticipated to amount to less than $10,000.00
annually.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
~H.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING POLICIES, PROCEDURES,
AND FEES FOR RESERVING THE TIGARD SENIOR CENTER, ESTABLISHING A DEPOSIT,
AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard allows private, non-profit, and public use
of the Tigard Senior Center; and
WHEREAS, use of the rooms is increasing making clarification of room use
policies and procedures necessary; and
WHEREAS, the effective date for the implementation of the updated
policies, procedures, fees, and deposits is January 1, 1.995.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
Section 1: The Tigard Senior Center Room Use Policies and Rental
Procedures, shown as "Exhibit A," which outlines meeting
room fees and deposits is adopted.
Section 2: This resolution shall be effective on and after the first
day of January, 1995.
PASSED: This day of 1994.
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
h:\1ogin\nadine\scres
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
Page 1
b
"Exhibit A"
TIGARD SENIOR CENTER ROOM USE POLICIES AND RENTAL. PROCEDURES
Welcome to the Tigard Senior Center.
The Tigard Senior Center is located at 8815 SW O'Mara Street, Tigard. We hope this brochure
will be useful in answering your questions. If you would like additional information, please call
the Room Reservation Coordinator at 639-4171.
Making a Reservation
C All reservations require submission of a Senior Center Room Use application.
• Applications must be submitted at least fourteen (14) days prior to the desired
reservation date; room use fees are payable at the time of application.
• Cleaning/security deposits are due fourteen (14) days in advance of the rental date.
• Applicants must be 21 years of age or older.
Alcohol Use
Consumption of alcohol may be permitted with the written authorization of the City and in
accordance with state statutes and City guidelines. Authorization will be granted upon
completion of an additional application for use of alcohol. The "Application for Permit" must be
completed in its entirety. In addition, a $1,000,000 (one million) host liquor liability insurance
endorsement must be submitted with the application.
Rental Periods
The Tigard Senior Center is available for reservation:
Monday through Friday - 5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Saturday and Sunday - 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
The minimum reservation period is two (2) hours. In determining how Tong to reserve the
facility, please include enough time for both set-up and clean-up.
Kitchen Use
When the Upstairs Activity room is used, the coffee machine, refrigerator, and warming ovens
may be used. (User must supply the coffee.)
Cooking is allowed if the kitchen is reserved and with prior approval from Senior Center
personnel. A regular trained Loaves & Fishes representative must be in attendance whenever
the kitchen facilities are used for cooking purposes. A minimum two (2) hour kitchen charge
will be assessed in addition to the rental fee.
Cancellations"
F. > t Please submit cancellations, in writing, no less than 48 hours prior to the scheduled event. A
$10.00 service charge will be retained for each -cancellation.
Once reservations are approved, all efforts will be made to keep the room schedule intact;
however, the City retains the right to cancel or relocate a function upon 24 hours notice.
Page 1
:a
Group Classifications
For the purpose of scheduling reservations and determining fees, groups will be classified as
shown below:
Class 1: Tigard Loaves and Fishes
Advance Reservation Period: 1 year
Class 2: City Business & Governmental Agencies
Advance Reservation Period: 1 year
Class 3: Non-profit Organizations or Tigard Resident.
For purposes of determining group classification, those who reside, own property,
or whose business office is located within the city limits of Tigard are considered
residents. Examples of events falling under this category include: parties,
potlucks, receptions, and meetings that do not promote a for-profit business.
Advance Reservation Period: 3 months*
Class 4: Profit Events by Tigard Residents
A profit event is defined as one that promotes a for-profit business.
Advance Reservation Period: 3 months
Class 5: General Public
Private and profit organizations based outside of Tigard.
Advance Reservation Period: 3 months*
*Weddings may be reserved up to 5 months in advance.
To allow many different groups to have an opportunity to use the facilities, any repetitive users
will be reviewed on a monthly basis through the application process. Priority for room use is
given to class categories in ascending order beginning with Class 1.
Room Rental Fees:
The rates shown below are hourly rates. Please see "Group Classifications" to determine what
your rental fee is.
Class x # of
Area Capacity 1 and 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 hours Fee
Upstairs Activity Room 180 No fee $10.00 $20.00 $25.00 $ t;
Downstairs Activity Rm 150 No fee $10.00 $20.00 $25.00 $
rZIa oom (do wnstairs) 30 Pilo fee $ 5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $
oom (downstairs) 30 _ No Fee $ 5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $
3
Page 2
Se
-r
Cleaning/Security (deposit
A cleaning/security deposit is required no less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the
reservation date. The amount of the cleaning/security deposit is based on whether food and/or
beverages will be served, and the size of the group. The cleaning/security deposit is as follows:
No food or beverage Food and/or beverage
Groups of 80 or less $ 50.00 $150.00
Groups of more than 80 $100.00 $250.00
The cleaning/security deposit may be returned under the following conditions:
1. The facility is left in clean, good condition and the following has been done:
a. linoleum covered floors swept and stains damp mopped;
b. carpeted areas vacuumed;
C. sinks and counter tops cleaned;
d. all waste emptied into garbage containers; and
e. tables and chairs cleaned and returned to original set up.
(A checklist of items to be cleaned will be provided at the time the reservation is
confirmed.)
2. The facility is left undamaged;
3. The facility is vacated at the scheduled time; and
4. The key and "Checklist for Meeting Room Users" are turned in at the Police Department.
The user may also be liable for:
1. Repair or replacement of equipment or facilities damaged due to neglect, vandalism, or
misuse.
2. Replacement of locks and keys, in the event keys are not returned.
3. Additional expenses incurred by the City to clean room(s) if not left in the same condition
as found. (May include shampooing carpets.)
The Administrative Services Manager will determine the amount of the cleaning/security deposit
to be refunded based on the User's report and input from Senior Center personnel. If any of
the deposit is kept by the City a listing of how the deposit was used will be provided to the user.
The Room Reservation Coordinator will submit a refund request to the Accounting Division
within ten working days of the event or ten working days after the cleaning or repairs are
completed.
General Information
The City is pleased to make meeting rooms available to the general public. Please help us
continue to offer this service by following these guidelines:
1. The user shall designate an adult supervisor who will be responsibl6 for the group's
activities, signing the application form, receipting and returning keys, and being present
at activities.
2. Functions occurring in rooms must not violate any city ordinance or state statute.
3. Activities must not be disruptive to others present in the building or the neighboring
homes.
4. Amplified sound systems are permitted but at no time shall the decibel level exceed that
which can be heard beyond the room being used.
r Page 3
10i 11111111 1 ~ MW
5. Smoking is prohibited in any location inside the building.
6. Prepared refreshments are allowed with prior approval. Cooking is not allowed unless
the kitchen facilities are reserved.
7. Decorations may be attached to walls and fixtures with masking tape.
3. Use of the telephone, typewriter, copy machine, etc. is not allowed.
The application, room use fee, and cleaning/security deposit may be mailed or delivered to the
City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
Thank you for your cooperation. 'If you have any questions, please contact the Room
Reservation Coordinator at 639-4171.
YICIIATY MAP
n
CITY H Y
c AND 3E R R CEN
TA
J
m
(J
S
HAM-RD., LU
W1~ o
GARY
NNE
0 cR~EK p
LIP
TIGARD
SENOR R CENT
&A
i
LU
..d
Page 4
J~I!I 11,
ME BRIE Le R
W