Loading...
City Council Packet - 11/10/1992 Bar- Revised 11/4/92 (Item No. 5 Amended) CITY OF TIGARD ' OREGON AGENDA PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). if no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard In any order after 7:30 p.m. 6:30 p.m. STUDY SESSION The following. items are tentatively scheduled for discussion, time permitting, during the Study Session or Administrative Update/Review portion of the agenda. Update.... - Police Department Community Youth Services Gang Grant Emergency Preparedness Report on FBI Academy Experience 7:30 p.m. 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 7:35 p.m. 2. PRESENTATION: • Public Service Announcement Video - Libraries (Featuring Portland Trailblazer, Terry Porter) 7:45 p.m. 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 1 7:55 p.m. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 4.1 Council Minutes: October 13, 20, 27, 1992 4.2 Receive and File: Council Calendar . 4.3 Authorize approval of an Agreement with the Oregon Department of Transportation for Improvements on Scholls Ferry Road - Resolution No. 92-- 4.4 Approve Community Development Block Grant Needs Assessment - Res. No. 92-_ 8:10 p.m. 5. PUBLICS HEARING POSTPONED: 5.1 CONSIDERATION OF WITHDRAWAL FROM TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Public Hearing Continued to a Date Uncertain - Council decided at their October 13, 1992, meeting to focus on efforts to prepare a 190 Intergovernmental Agreement. The public hearing scheduled for November 10, 1992, to consider withdrawal of the City from the Water District will not occur because of the renewed "190 Agreement" effort. 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 91-0005/ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 91-0006 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL PLAN DESIGNATION/C-C ZONING DISTRICT Public hearing was continued on September 8, 1992 to November 10, 1992. Staff is recommending that the hearing be set over to November 24, 1992. C8:15 p.m. 6. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION - ZCA GARRETT (NPO #3): A request to annex one parcel consisting of 2.44 acres into the City of Tigard and to change the zone from Washington County R-6 (residential, 6 units/acre) to the City of Tigard zone R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre). LOCATION: 12040 S.W. Bull Mountain Road. ZONE: The R-4.5 zone allow single family residential units, public support facilities, residential' treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. • Open Public Hearing • Declarations or Challenges • Staff Report - Community Development • Public Testimony Proponents Opponents Rebuttal • Council Questions/Comments • Staff Recommendation • Public Hearing Closed • Council Consideration: Resolution No. 92-53 and Ordinance No. 92- 3p r' COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 2 8:30 p.m. 7. POLICE-RELATED ORDINANCES FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION (Police Chief Ron Goodpaster): 7.1 Ordinance Regulating Parking of Large Vehicles (rMIC 10.28.020) -Ordinance No. 92-_ ( 7.2 Ordinance Regulating Removal of Abandoned Vehicles (TMiC 7.60.030) - Ordinance No. 92- 7.3 Ordinance Concerning Police Reserve Officers - Ordinance No. 92-52- 8:45 p.m. 8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 8:55 p.m. 9. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW/UPDATE Annexation/Growth Management Discussion (Community Development Director Ed Murphy) 9:45 p.m. 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. 10:00 P.M. 11. ADJOURNMENT =1110.92 5 i COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 3 Ftg { i as 1 1!!! a ' Council Agenda Item 3 T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 • Meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m. by Mayor Edwards. 1. ROLL CALL z Council Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors Judy Fessler, Valerie Johnson, Joe Kasten, and John Schwartz. Staff Present: Patrick Reilly, City Administrator; Ron Goodpaster, Chief of Police; Ed Murphy, Community Development Director; Liz Newton, Community Relations Coordinator; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Duane Roberts, Associate Planner; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; Bob Wheeler, Police Lieutenant (present for Study Session only) and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. STUDY SESSION a. Police Department Report on FBI Academy Experience: Lt. Bob Wheeler, a recent graduate of the FBI Academy, thanked the City council for making it possible for him to attend this schooling. Highlights of his reporte included the following information: • Academy is an 11-week course, and one earns 27 college credit hours. • The program focuses on increasing workloads and decreasing financial resources. • The emphasis is on problem solving and community policing. • The program utilizes a holistic approach: physical fitness, academics, and social (developing a network for future resources). • In U.S., Portland is the role model for community policing. • Community policing is not a "program" rather it is a philosophy. • Police Departments, including Tigard, are changing their ways of doing things this is difficult for some to adjust- More citizen involvement and integration of the officers into the community is foreseen. i CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 PAGE 1 mom i Community Youth Services Gang Grant: Chief of Police Ron Goodpaster advised of a four-phased program (beginning in January) to assess, disseminate information, hold workshops and then reassess anti-gang efforts. Tigard, Tualatin and Sherwood will participate in this program which is funded by a $7,500 grant through Washington County Community Youth Services. Very few programs of this type have been tried; however, preliminary results from a similar effort in Phoenix, Arizona look promising. It is hoped that elements of the program can be shared in some manner during the Fanno Creek Conference in February. Oregon State Patrol 1 OSPZ: Chief Goodpaster reported that an OSP representative contacted him recently about assistance on portions of I-5 (south bound) and Highway 217 which run through Tigard. Assistance is requested for "first response" by the Tigard Police Department while the OSP cuts back their hours to two ten-hour shifts each day. Tigard P.D. coverage would be from 2 to 6 a.m. In return OSP would be available to Tigard for assistance at other times. The proposal is still being developed; although, the OSP appears to want to implement such an agreement sometime this month. Chief Goodpaster noted this is probably the beginning of a series of cutbacks for OSP because of the State's financial situation. Emergency Preparedness: Chief Goodpaster noted that an emergency preparedness plan was adopted in 1983. It has never been necessary to implement the plan. Emergencies which Tigard may face include possible problems resulting from failure of Scoggins Dam (flooding of several homes), a mishap at a chlorine plant, or earthquake (to give an idea of the magnitude of what Tigard may have to deal with). The plan is being updated. The needs of the community in an emergency would be met with varying degrees of success depending on the type of disaster. For example, is the emergency self-contained (that is, only the Tigard area is involved) or is the disaster is regional. A regional disaster would mean comretition for the same equipment and resources at the same time. The Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District is the primary planner for disaster plan-implementation. The Police Department would assist with roles to be played by the Public Works Department, Council, and City Administration. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 2 Mr. Goodpaster advised that the County applied for a grant a couple of years ago for earthquake planning. An intergovernmental agreement to participate in such planning will be forwarded to City Council for approval. Discussion followed on emergency preparedness and the need for continued communication and work with other agencies in the area. b. Agenda Review Council briefly reviewed the business meeting agenda. Chief Goodpaster answered several questions about the three police-related ordinances which were proposed for council consideration. Most questions centered on the police reserve officers, ordinance. Mr. Goodpaster described the contributions by the reserve officers. This ordinance would be implemented only if the reserve officers were called to duty under an emergency or if the City chose to subcontract to others for security services. The Chief explained that he would have control over the circumstances which would necessitate the use of the provisions in the ordinance. BUSINESS MEETING 2. PRESENTATION: • Public Service Announcement Video - Libraries (Featuring Portland Trailblazer Terry Porter) Jody Westerman of the Tigard Public Library (TPL) introduced a public service announcement video featuring Portland Trailblazer Terry Porter. This feature was filmed in the TPL and will be shown nationwide over the next several months. 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA: No visitors. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: M^.tion by Councilor Fessler, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to consider -Item 4.4 separately and to remove it from the Consent Agenda. Motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. Motion by Councilor Kasten, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to approve the following Consent Agenda Items (4.1, 4.2 and 4.3) : CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 3 4.1 Council Minutes: October 13, 20, 27, 1992 4.2 Receive and File: Council Calendar 4.3 Authorize approval of an Agreement with the Oregon Department of Transportation for Improvements on Scholls Ferry Road - Resolution No. 92-52 The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. Council consideration of: 4.4 Approve Community Development Block Grant Needs Assessment Associate Planner Duane Roberts explained that the Needs Inventory was a compilation of potential projects identified by staff and Council. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Fessler, to approve Consent Agenda Item 4.4 as submitted. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. Councilor Fessler noted that if more needs are identified within the next day or so, Council should contact staff. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS POSTPONED: 5.1 CONSIDERATION OF WITHDRAWAL FROM TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Public Hearing Continued to a Date Uncertain - Council decided at their October 13, 1992, meeting to focus on efforts to prepare a 190 Intergovernmental Agreement. The public hearing scheduled for November 10, 1992, to consider withdrawal of the City from the Water District will not occur because of the renewed 11190 Agreement" effort. 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 91-0005/ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 91-0006 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL PLAN DESIGNATION/C-C ZONING DISTRICT Public hearing was continued on September 8, 1992 to November 101 1992. Staff is recommending that the hearing be set over to November 24, 1992. Mayor Edwards advised of the set over of the two items above. These items were set over as requested by Council consensus. 6. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION - ZCA GARRETT (NPO #3 A request to annex one parcel consisting of 2.44 acres into the City of Tigard and to change the zone from Washington County R-6 (residential, 6 units/acre) to the City of Tigard zone R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre). LOCATION: 12040 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 4 S.W. Bull Mountain Road. ZONE: The R-4.5 zone allow single family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. a. Public hearing was opened by Mayor Edwards. b. Declarations or challenges: Councilor Fessler advised that she had been contacted by Mr. Lasselle who advised her about some of his concerns with the process for the annexation. c. Community Development Director Murphy reviewed the staff report. He noted there was a correction to the legal description which should be incorporated into the approving documents. He advised that staff recommended approval of the annexation. d. Councilor Kasten noted, in reviewing the map of the area, that a small portion of Bull Mountain Road, not contiguous to the proposed annexation area, was not included. He questioned why this road section was not annexed at this time. Councilor Fessler also questioned why the portion of Bull Mountain Road was proposed for annexation which would create an island of the Lasselle property. These items were discussed. Community Development Director Murphy responded that 'the reason the island was created was due to staff's understanding of council's direction to be proactive in their annexation of this area. With regard to Councilor Kasten's question above, staff did not consider any non-contiguous roadway for this annexation proposal, although it would be possible to do so . e. Public testimony: Lynette Garrett, 12040 S.W. Bull Mountain Road, Tigard, OR 97224, noted that she was one of the property owners of the subject annexation area. She said they wanted to annex because of their desire for a sewer connection and for future development of the property. Ms. Garrett said she favored the annexation of the road as proposed as well as the Lasselle's property in the future. f. Council discussion followed. Councilor Fessler said she agreed that both sides of the road should be annexed, but noted she had concerns with the road being extended to CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 5 i create the island. There was reference to a Council workshop held earlier in the year (May) wherein Council had decided to be more proactive in annexations. There were questions concerning the portion of Bull Mountain Road that Councilor Kasten identified. City Attorney advised that if this particular piece of property was placed with this annexation then additional public notice and a new hearing would be necessary. Councilor Johnson advised that she thought staff's recommendation with regard to the annexation of that portion of Bull Mountain Road which makes the Lasselle property an island was what Council wanted staff to do from their previous workshop discussions. City Council requested staff to bring back, for future consideration, annexation proposals for portions of Bull Mountain Road which are contiguous to the City. g. Public hearing was closed. h. Staff recommended the proposed ordinance and resolution be approved. i. RESOLUTION NO. 92-53 - A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "A" AND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED. (ZCA 92-06) (GARRETT) j. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to approved Resolution No. 92-53. The motion passed by unanimous vote of Council present. k. ORDINANCE NO. 92-30 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZCA 92-06) (GARRETT) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to approve Ordinance No. 92-30. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 7. POLICE-RELATED ORDINANCES FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION (Police Chief Ron Goodpaster): 7.1 Ordinance Regulating Parking of Large Vehicles (TMC 10.28.020) a. Council consensus was to set this item aside until after their review of the recreational vehicle (RV) CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 6 t - ffillawomi cum front yard storage (setback requirements) issue. The RV ordinance will be discussed again during a Council workshop scheduled for November 17, 1992. 7.2. Ordinance Regulating Removal of Abandoned Vehicles (TMC 7.60.030) a. Police Chief Goodpaster summarized the staff report noting that the proposed ordinance amendment will give the City a definition of what a stored vehicle is and will require movement of an abandoned vehicle of at least 500 feet. b. (City Recorder Note: A motion to approve Ordinance 92-31 was made by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Fessler, and passed by a unanimous vote of Council present. At a point later in the meeting, it was noted that the Police Chief desired to have this ordinance be declared an emergency in order to address several problem areas in the City. There was a motion by Councilor Kasten, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to reconsider Item 7.2 which contained Ordinance No. 92-31. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. The following sequence of action reflects the Council's amendment to the ordinance to include an emergency clause.) C. ORDINANCE NO. 92-31 - AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 7.60.030 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO, THE PROCEDURE FOR REMOVAL OF AN ABANDONED VEHICLE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. d. Motion by Councilor Kasten, seconded by Councilor Fessler, to approve the amended ordinance which also contains the emergency clause wording. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 7.3 Ordinance Concerning Police Reserve Officers a. Chief of Police Goodpaster reviewed the staff report concerning the ordinance amendment pertaining to the police reserve officers. He advised that the reserve officers' duties are regulated closely by the City Police Department. b. In response to a question by Mayor Edwards concerning the fiscal impact, Mr. Goodpaster advised that the fiscal impact would be minimal since the implementation of the payment to reserve CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 7 Lm officers and worker's compensation insurance would be done only in circumstances under the control of the City. Any subcontracted work done by the reserve officers would be sanctioned and coordinated by and through the City. Discussion followed on the reserve officers and the services they provide the Police Department. Mr. Goodpaster responded to a question from Councilor Johnson and noted that the Tigard Police Officers Association (police union) supports the reserve officer program. He also noted that a large number of officers, including himself, began their career as a reserve officer. Often times, the reserve officers are used as a hiring pool and a cooperative relationship exists. C. ORDINANCE NO. 92-32 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.28 BY AMENDING SECTIONS OF 2.28.030 RELATING TO THE EQUIPMENT AND UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS FOR POLICE RESERVES; AND 2.28.100 RELATING TO COMPENSATION FOR POLICE RESERVE OFFICERS. d. Motion by Councilor Kasten, seconded by Councilor Fessler, to approve Ordinance No. 92-32. The motion passed a unanimous vote of Council present. 8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: None (council recessed and reconvened in the Town Hall Conference Room at 8:40 p.m. Prior to exiting the Town Hall, Mayor Edwards announced that Annexation/Growth Management would be discussed in a workshop setting in the Town Hall Conference Room. The Mayor also advised that the Council would hold an Executive Session as outlined below.) 9. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW/UPDATE Annexation/Growth Management Discussion (Community Development Director Ed Murphy) City Administrator Reilly advised that this discussion was a follow-up to the September 22, 1992 Council meeting. During the September meeting, council decided that the Walnut Island would not be forced to annex to the City. Instead, it was proposed that a double majority annexation be attempted. j ("Double majority" means a majority of registered voters, plus a majority of landowners must approve annexation.) The other alternative would be to continue the current practice of annexing in a piecemeal manner when individuals approach the OEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 8 City to request annexation. The Community Development Director reviewed the double majority process. The City must declare their intent and then the formal process would begin. Once the declaration of intent is made, information would be disseminated throughout the area. A door-to-door petition-signing campaign would be conducted. It would be expected that this part of the process would be implemented next fall. A public hearing would be scheduled, probably, in 1994 to forward the issue to the voters. Councilor Kasten advised it would probably not be wise to continue annexation by piecemeal while this double-majority effort is occuring. He suggested a non-remonstrance type of agreement could be entered into with those persons who needed to hook up to sewer. In response to a question from Councilor-elect Paul Hunt, Community Development Director Murphy advised that there have been no contacts by staff with the people in the area to determine if there are great concerns or how they stand on the annexation issue. Mayor Edwards advised that years ago, there was a great deal of opposition to annexation. Council Fessler suggested that once the declaration of intent is made by the City that a survey be conducted to determine the concerns of the people living in this area. Councilor Schwartz noted that people were not coming in large numbers to the City and requesting to be annexed. He said an education program would be very important. Staff advised that a proposed work program would be submitted to Council in January with regard to the Walnut Island annexation process utilizing the double majority method. Councilor Johnson noted that the declaration of intent appears to be an aggressive City stance but is required by state law for a double majority annexation effort. Mayor Edwards noted that in order for an annexation campaign to be successful, the Council must be proactive and they must be unified. Councilor Schwartz added that information must be given to the community in a consistent fashion. He suggested that a fact sheet be prepared for reference by those who will give out information. City Administrator Reilly advised that the double majority process would be explained and the staff would return to the Council with a package outlining procedures in January 1993. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 9 Councilor-elect Hunt advised he did not think Council was necessarily bound by a letter written by a previous Mayor or Council. He said that he did not think one council could limit the actions of a future Council. Councilor Schwartz agreed with Mr. Hunt; however, in reviewing past annexations which occurred where people were not willing to be annexed, the situation was not good and it took years for the City to recover from the negative results. Councilor Johnson noted the importance of maintaining the integrity of the City's word. Discussion then turned to the area south of Bull Mountain Road which was identified as an area which the City would like to see annexed in the near future. It was noted that if Tigard's active area of interest was extended, then these properties, as they develop, would have to annex because of the need to hook up to the sewer. It was noted that the City should be talking to owners of "raw" land. Community Development Director Murphy noted that if this area was in Tigard's active area of interest the City could provide planning, charge development fees to support the area, and identify available open space. Staff will pursue the extension of the active planning area and meet with County staff. 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive session at 9:20 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. 11. ADJOURNMENT: 9:48 p.m. Attest: therine Wheatley, Ci Recorder City of Tigard Coun 1 President Date: =1110.92 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - PAGE 10 's i COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal Tr 7389 P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising e City of Tigard C E 1,00 • ❑ Tearshest Not, v o eo ~n ' ~•es PO Box 23397 E w 41992 w ® Tigard, OR 97223 ❑ Duplicate Affid, ;moo ,ty , e ~cn zoo CITY. Of.TIGAR* N Qv. g ~o'~ q o :SvU Q AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) Ix ° E COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. H Judith Koehler ; 04 ~AA. ~-EM,`~ o being first duly sworn, depose and say thqrp t I a a o p Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the TiRarCt Ames Ern a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 153.010 .4,0. ~ w; lsi. _j, %n and 193.020; published at-__ Ti garci in the aforesaid county and state; that the City Coundi Business Meeting C7•~.~ as a ` t ::'"go b` q a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the o ~ Z entire issue of said newspaper for__ Or►e successive and 11.2 .9 = cr. 6: consecutive in the following issues: °q~F^, 9 U, t~ C November S 1992 0 . Ag s=t ce, S w dd ~i M ° iii rA 'M Subscribed and swo to before me this r, 1992. Notary Public for Oregon My Commissio xpires. AFFIDAVIT 15111 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 T1' 7385 Legal Notice Advertising ° City of Tigard R E C t V. • ❑ Tearsheet Notie ° P.O. Box 23397 21~g~ l Y.ICARIIAi~ Tigard, OR 97223 ® ❑ Duplicate Affids The followm wiu,be considered b die T! ~ C! ly, Cburiell on ldavtii = • Cl,y of TIGARf ° ber 10, 19928 at 7:30; tvlr'atTagazd C!v!c Ccilicr, T®wn liefll,Ri3oln, .13125 SW_ Ball Bbulevardl, 'Tigard; _Oreg6n.1~ui~tlit:r lnftsr=iiatint! may. be obtained €roan the" Coiitrniinlty.Deeelopmeat Dina for or,Clty Romer at the same location or byvd ing 639-4171 Ydii are !nv#tt it ta'sibvwrit . ten testiinany.in advance of the public hearmgg--:wrltteat'atttl oiltrliony AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION wall`be considered al cfie heang !T&V, 4n i- lte conducted in accosdw" with the bppllcable Chapter 1$32 of ilia .Tigard unicigial STATE OF OREGON, ) Code and 'an' bf prcceduaes adopted by t6 Council and eat COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss.,l Judith Koehler)IVE CHJGF ANNE:Cr'i,Tt 3 ? A 92-{fk1fl6 t3A1IL't°T (N?0 #3) A being first duly sworn, depose and say tOrd That I am the Advertising request to antiez`pnt; garcel'eonststillg Of;2:4d dCre3'lrlio iliC Cl3y'af Director, or his principal clerk, of the i maS Tigard anti to chsnge;the zone fibin has higton Coun R-6 (li esldenti a newspaper of general circ tion s defined in ORS 193.010 6 unlts/acrd) to the City of Ti t{rtl zone:ltl-4 5 (ltesldebhad, $S:iaants/acre).' and 193.020; Published at igarg in the APPLTCAl31.E REVIEW' CRITERIA -Cd-m- -ehensive Plat; P+rellt:ies aforesaid county and state; that the 1~:1.n,101:2:1(? 13;`10 21;:10 2.2`10.2 3,'110.3 I, 10.3 2, Ctuniituiziiy'" _ZC.A 92_000 Garrett DedelopmentCd& Secilons.`.18 32.020,18;32130,;1$ 136,;:).813$, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the 18.13 020 (A) (B); LOCATION 12040 SW Bill] 1Vlointo; n Road (2S,I, one lOBC; tax lot I400), 20)VE .R4-S' (lteaideniinl, 4 5 ts/acae) Tie it-4 entire issue of said newspaper for successive and zone. alioWs-10 :5 igIe fan►ily xesrdeniia~ eatil6s,`gublic suppori~fgt tl~i consecutive in the following issues: residential tres ti tmgntt gM08,-farming, snail sctuat:d homes. a t #i tiare,:home oteiipauons, tertipsirary )ises, and at aecsory an~ori. October 29, 1992 otL"'r s - T7385 Publish.Octaber 29,:1992. , Subscribed anjSwor to before meththis Z9 da•. of Q tober 1992 -srs Notary Public for Oregon Ally Commission Expires: el AFFIDAVIT 110 ~ij CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) 1, 1 begin first duly sworn, on oath, depose an say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number (s) qa - 3B'. q 1, q ~l° 3 which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated W&4 I c 1 149 A- copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and. by reference made a part hereof, on the day of ` jt,4 , 19 9-5-1 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. West One Bank, 12260 SW Main Street, Tigard, Oregon > 3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 4. Albertson's Store, Corner of Pacific Hwy. (State Hwy. 99) and SW Durham Road, Tigard, Oregon Subscribed and sworn to before me this. day of 19R Z . , OFFICIAL SEAL CONNIE MARTIN Notary y Public for Oregon NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON COMMISSION No. 015677 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE d, 1996 My Commission Expires: login\jo\affpost CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 92- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZCA 92- 06) (GARRETT) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for annexation signed by Nicholas and Lynette Garrett, who are the owners of the subject parcel; and WHEREAS, The City Council held a public hearing on November 10, 1992 to consider the annexation request and to consider zoning designations for the properties; and nt u tre•n ~ 1 ~ WHEREAS, on September-, 1992 the City Council approved a resolution forwarding the annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission; and WHEREAS, the zoning district designation as set forth in section 1 below is consistent with the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan Map. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The recommendation of the planning staff as set forth below is consistent with policy 10.1.2 and 10.1.3 of the City's Comprehensive Plan (See attached Zone Change Exhibit). Tax Map/Lot-Number Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 2S1 10BC, 1400 Wash. Co. R-6 Tigard R-4.5 Section 2: The property meets the definition for a developing area as defined in Chapter 18.138 of the Community Development Code and shall be designated as such on the development standards area map. Section 3: This ordinance shall become effective upon filing of the annexation final order with the office of the Secretary of State. PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 10-bh day of 7A) Catherine Wheatley,'City Recor r APPROVED: This day of v , 1992. e d R, s, Mayor Approved as to t Attorn Date a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ! ` ORDINANCE NO. 92-~_ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 7.60.030 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROCEDURE FOR REMOVAL OF AN ABANDONED VEHICLE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, a police department request that an abandoned vehicle be removed often results in the vehicle being moved a few feet, requiring further police action; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to amend the Code to aid in the removal of abandoned vehicles; now, therefore, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 7.60.010(1) (c), (d), and (e) are amended to read as follows: (c) The vehicle appears to be wrecked, partially dismantled or junked, or (d) The vehicle appears to have been stored. For the purpose of this section, "stored" is defined in 10.28.022(3) of this code, or (e) The vehicle has remained in the same position, or within the 500 foot radius of its earlier position, for a period of 30 days. SECTION 2: Section 7.60.030 is amended to read as follows: Section 7.60.030 Removal--Procedure. An abandoned vehicle which remains in the same position, or remains within a 500 foot radius of its earlier position for a period of five days (holidays, Saturdays, and Sundays not included), after an owner has been requested to remove it or after notice has been served as required by Section 7.60.020, shall be removed by the police department using their own personnel, equipment or facilities or those of others. SECTION 3: Inasmuch as it is necessary that this ordinance be adopted with the least possible delay in order to ensure that reasonable safeguards for health, safety, and welfare of the public are maintained, pursuant to the removal of abandoned vehicles, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage and approval by the council. ORDINANCE No. 92-3) Page 1 f i t a V i 3 t 1 1 Cl PASSED: By U n Ct Y1 t M V U5 vote of all Council members } present after being read by number and title only, 3 1992- this lam- day of r\ Catherine Wheatley, City Rec der 1992. APPROVED: This ~ day of- Gera war s, Mayor t Approved as to form: r Ci Attorney i~ Z/0/ Date i r Page 2 - ORDINANCE No. 92-0-L- t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 92- 3 a AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.28 BY AMENDING SECTIONS 2.28.030 RELATING TO THE EQUIPMENT AND UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS FOR POLICE RESERVE; AND 2.28.100 RELATING TO COMPENSATION FOR POLICE RESERVE OFFICERS WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to provide and maintain uniforms for the Police Reserve; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to guarantee police officer base rate of pay to reserve officers called to duty under an emergency; and WHEREAS, reserve officers are often called upon to perform duties falling outside their regular duties, such as providing security for athletic events and directing traffic for large gatherings; and WHEREAS, The City Council wishes to allow the Police Department to contract out the police reserve officers for such outside jobs at the base police officer rate; and WHEREAS, ORS 656.031 allows the City to elect to have municipal volunteer personnel considered as subject workers for purposes of j Workers' Compensation.; now, therefore, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 2.28.030 of the Tigard Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 2.28.030 Equipment and uniform requirements. The City shall furnish and maintain uniforms for reserve officers. All reserves will be required to purchase their own protection vest, weapon, duty belt and equipment. The protection vest will be replaced when needed, as determined by the chief of police, at city expense. SECTION 2: Section 2.28.100 of the Tigard Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 2.28.100 Compensation Provisions and Contract Services. A. Members of the police reserve shall receive no compensation for their membership therein or while on duty unless the chief of police declares an i emergency and then they would be paid based on police officer rate. 1 B. However, Section (A) above shall not prohibit C the City from contracting with public or private entities for services provided by reserve police officers including, but not limited to, providing security and directing traffic, and shall charge base police officer rate for such services. s C. While on duty as a reserve officer, each individual will be covered by the city workers' compensation insurance for work related injuries and under the city's liability policy as long as they are acting within the scope and responsibility of their position, unless prohibited by a separate agreement. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its z passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By UnCt n1m Uy~s vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of _ l~I o V P b~ , 1992. ,s Ca herine Wheatley, City Re rder 0 APPROVED: This _ day of OV o , 1992. al dwards, Mayor Approved as to form: Attorn y Date Page 2 - ORDINANCE No. 92-,3QL 111 11!! In AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 -VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE: Noviiiibdr "'i992 (Umited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. STAFF NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC CONTACTED 1 og n o rs.s 1 9 Council Agenda Item MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Patrick J. Reilly, City Administrator DATE: October 5, 1992 SUBJECT: COUNCIL CALENDAR, October - December 192 Official Council meetings are marked with an asterisk If generally OK, we can proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars. November '92 3 Tue Election Day * 10 Tue Council Meeting Council Study Session (6:30) Council Business Meeting (7:30) 11 'Aced Veteran's Day Holiday - City Offices Closed 14-16 Sat- League of Oregon Cities Conference - Portland Mon * 17 Tue Council Study Meeting (6:30) * 24 Tue Council Meeting Council Study Session (5:30 - Tentative) Council Business Meeting (7:30) 26,27 Thur- Thanksgiving Holidays -City Hall Offices Closed Fri 28 Sat Departure for National League of Cities Conference - New Orleans (November 28 - December 2) December '92 4 Fri Community Tree Lighting Ceremony - City Hall (5:30 p.m.) * 8 Tue Council Meeting Council Study Session (6:30) Council Business Meeting (7:30) * 15 'life CQ'.'`ici l Ctl3dy Me t3 ng (6:30) * 22 Tue Council Meeting Council Study Session (6:30) Council Business Meeting (7:30) 25 Fri Christmas Holiday - City Offices Closed January '93 1 Fri New Year's Holiday - City Offices Closed * 12 Tue Council Meeting Council Study Session (6:30) Council Business Meeting (7:30) Oath of Office - Council Positions 1 & 2 State of the City (Mayor) Executive Summary (City Administrator) 18 Mon Martin Luther King Jr. Day Holiday - City Offices Closed * 19 Tue Council Study Meeting (6:30) 21 Tue Joint Meeting with Tigard-Tualatin School Board (7:00) * 26 Tue Council Meeting Council Study Session (6:30) Council Business Meeting (7:30) h:\login\cathy\cccal COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 10, 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: - ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ODOT Agreement PREVIOUS ACTION: for Scholls Ferry Road AJI PREPARED BY: City Engineer DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: ISSUE Ar, THE COUNCIL Shall the Council authorize approval of an agreement for improvements on Scholls Ferry Road? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of the attached resolution. INFORMATION SUMMARY The State is preparing to make improvements on Scholls Ferry Road between the railroad crossing and Highway 217. The improvements will include widening to provide additional turn lanes, regrading the railroad crossing, improving and interconnecting the traffic signals, and addition of pedestrian and bicycle paths. All construction costs will be paid by the State. The proposed agreement allows the State and its contractors to make 1 associated improvements within the right of way of Cascade Avenue. In addition, the agreement provides that Beaverton and Tigard will pay all costs of power to the signal at Cascade Avenue. It is standard practice for cities to pay for the power to traffic signals on State highways at the intersections with city streets. ISM The attached resolution authorizes the Mayor and City Recorder to sign the agreement. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES - FISCAL NOTES Tigard's share of the costs of power for the signal will be approximately $50 per month. rw/sprr-s MEN= i September 18, 1992 Misc. Contracts & Agreements No. 11299 COOPERATIVE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION FINANCE THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the STATE OF OREGON, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, hereinafter referred to as "State"; WASHINGTON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, acting by and through its Board of Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as "County"; CITY OF BEAVERTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, acting by and through its City Officials, hereinafter referred to as "Beaverton"; and CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, acting by and through its City Officials, hereinafter referred to as "Tigard". W I T N E S S E T H ' RECITALS 1. Scholls Highway (State Highway No. 143), is part of the State highway system under the jurisdiction and control of the Oregon Transportation Commission, (a portion of which passes through Tigard, Beaverton and Washington Co. jurisdiction). Cascade Blvd. is a city street under the jurisdiction of the City of Beaverton and Cascade Ave. is a continuance of that same city street under the jurisdiction of the City of Tigard. 2. By the authority granted in 366.770 and 366.775, State may enter into cooperative agreements with the counties and cities for the performance of work on certain types.of improvement projects with the allocation of costs on terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the contracting parties. 3. Under such authority, State is planning to construct the SPRR X'ing - Beaverton/ Tigard Hwy. section of Scholls Highway. The construction will include widening of Scholls Hwy., Cascade Ave./Blvd, and the S.B. on and off ramps to Hwy. 217; upgrade and interconnect the traffic signals at the intersections of Cascade Blvd./Ave. and Scholls Hwy., and the 217 SB on and off ramps at Scholls Hwy., hereinafter referred to as "Project". The location of project is approximately as shown on the sketch map att&,:.hEu hereto, warked Exhibit A, and by Lliii reference made a part hereof. Project will be financed 100 percent by State. B3192001/Key #03908 M C & A No. 11299 WASHINGTON COUNTY, CITY OF BEAVERTON AND CITY OF TIGARD 4. By authority granted in ORS 810.210, State is authorized to determine the character or type of traffic control signals to be used, and to place or erect them upon State highways at places where State deems necessary for the safe and expeditious control of traffic. No traffic control signals shall be erected or maintained upon any State highway by any authority other than State, except with its written approval. Traffic signal work on the project shall conform to the current State standards and specifications. 5. State and County have previously entered into agreement No. 6975, on April 20, 1979, covering construction, power costs, and maintenance responsibilities. It has been determined that the responsibilities for power and maintenance costs as previously defined shall be superseded by this agreement. All other provisions that previous agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 6. State, County and City of Beaverton are currently entering into agreement No. 10832 which transfers signal maintenance responsibilities to City of Beaverton. NOW THEREFORE, the premises being in general as stated in the foregoing RECITALS, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: STATE OBLIGATIONS 1. State shall identify and obtain or issue the required permits; perform all design work required to produce final plans, specifications and estimates; advertise, let and award the contract; furnish all construction engineering, material testing, technical inspection and project manager services for administration of the contract. 2. State shall annually reimburse Beaverton for 100 percent of maintenance costs of traffic control signals in accordance with agreement No. 10832 and will provide power at its own expense for the signal at the intersection of Scholls Hwy. and the on and off ramps to Hwy. 217. 3. State shall annually reimburse Beaverton for 100 percent of the costs of maintaining the signals at the intersection of Scholls Hwy. and Cascade Blvd./Ave. State will provide power for this signal and will bill City of Beaverton annually for its share (50 percent), and City of Tigard annually for its share (50 percent). B3192001/Key #03908 - 2 - M~I MEMO= C ' M C & A NO. 11299 WASHINGTON COUNTY, CITY OF BEAVERTON 1 AND CITY OF TIGARD BEAVERTON OBLIGATIONS 1. Beaverton hereby grants State the right to enter onto and occupy city's right-of-way for the construction of the project and possible or emergency maintenance of the traffic signal equipment, including vehicle detector loops. 2. Beaverton shall maintain the project signals in accordance with agreement No. 10832 and bill State annually for 100 percent of maintenance costs. 3. Beaverton shall annually reimburse State for its share (50 percent), of all power necessary for the operation of traffic signals at the intersection of Scholls Hwy. and Cascade Blvd./Ave. 4. Beaverton shall provide the necessary right-of-way and easements on Cascade Blvd. for any roadwork and for installation and possible or emergency maintenance of the traffic signal equipment, including advance detector loops. 5. Beaverton shall upon completion of project, continue to maintain Cascade Blvd. and maintain the pavement surrounding the vehicle detector loops installed in its city street in such a manner ac tc -provlde adequate protection for said detector loops, and shall adequately maintain the pavement markings and signing installed on its right-of-way in accordance with the plans and specifications. 6. Beaverton shall authorize execution of this agreement during a regularly convened session of its City Council. TIGARD OBLIGATIONS 1. Tigard hereby grants State and Beaverton the right to enter onto and occupy city's right-of-way for the construction of the project and necessary maintenance of the traffic signal equipment, including vehicle detector loops. 2. Tigard shall annually reimburse State for its share (50 percent), of all power necessary for the operation of traffic signals at the intersection of Scholls Hwy. and Cascade Blvd./Ave. 3. Tigard shall provide the necessary right-of-way and / easements on Cascade Ave. for any roadwork and for installation l~ and maintenance of the traffic signal equipment, including advance detector loops by State and RenvPri-on.. B3192001/Key #03908 - 3 - M C & A No. 11299 WASHINGTON COUNTY, CITY OF BEAVERTON AND CITY OF TIGARD 4. Tigard shall upon completion of project, continue to maintain Cascade Ave. and maintain the pavement surrounding the vehicle detector loops installed in its city street in such a manner as to provide adequate protection for said detector loops, and shall adequately maintain the pavement markings and signing installed on its right-of-way in accordance with the plans and specifications. 5. Tigard shall authorize execution of this agreement during a regularly convened session of its City Council. COUNTY OBLIGATIONS 1. County hereby grants State the right to enter onto and occupy county right-of-way for the construction of the project. 2. County acknowledges the effect and scope of ORS 105.755 and agrees that all acts necessary to complete construction of the project which may alter or change the grade of existing County roads are being accomplished at the direct request of the County. 3. County shall provide the necessary county right-of-way and easements for any roadwork for construction of the project. 4. County shall enter into and execute this agreement during a duly authorized session of its Board of Commissioners. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. State, County, City of Beaverton and City of Tigard agree and understand that a mutual review of the project plans and specifications will be conducted prior to advertisement for construction bid proposals. 2. The contractor, its subcontractors, if any, and all employers working under this agreement are subject employers under the Oregon Workers' Compensation Law and shall comply with ORS 656.017, which requires them to provide workers compensation coverage for all their subject workers. B3192001/Key #03908 - 4 - M C & A No. 11299 WASHINGTON COUNTY, CITY OF-BEAVERTON AND CITY OF TIGARD IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their seals as of the day and year hereinafter written. The SPRR Xing-Beaverton/Tigard Highway section of Scholls Highway was approved by the Oregon Transportation Commission on July 21, 1992 as part of the Six Year Transportation Improvement Program. The Oregon Transportation Commission, by a duly adopted delegation order, authorized the State Highway Engineer to sign this agreement for and on behalf of the Commission. Said authority is set forth in the Minutes of the Oregon Transportation Commission. APPROV R N STATE OF OREGON, by and through its Department of Transportation, By Highway Division Region Engineer By APPROVED AS TO State Highway Engineer LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Date By Asst. Attorney General WASHINGTON COUNTY, by and through its Board of Commissioners By County Councel By Chair By ~I,UV~ SL i..4~ - Beaverton City Attorney Date By CITY O -by and through Tigard City Attorney its C' O ci is CITY OF BEAVERTON by and B v`4'= Y through s City Officials Ma or By, _ By Mayor City Recorder By Date 1 //0) City Recorder t Date B3192001 - 5 - MEN=, Yv.:•Y~,sy{ atF~ .I-.- dia _ j.r. .p sr r Ei r{+;. t. r•, A « •j ! Lit PFS~ 5y [kDACt Pf S~ A'_ 7aiJ ay`' £ t .v --i r; - - 1 1 ail+, r St il,,et., . M, 5, n1El,µ t v t SY * - - iiY~ J ty' A 't \ l u: Y WASHIMi Sf1tMAF ~ Y J'i~" eI K:x•.• ; t .r ~ wL _.rl ' _ r. ?1e'' \c i vtw E• 8 IL nHrov, 91 dFltt WYE f a' 1\~i"` •t• \ .y.., 1'` r TN ; a " Rr SN iE Z ll 9. .:a'-Z.. ` 4 s. ` w wlutn x•: l• y At tt it ~~r• %4`''' ~..L'+ ~~y tn:e 4= .i.% ofuL w.,n Sl ,t , n "i• .-~`t.•. 3' \ ± YP I w~a 1 e^:_'e.~y '7J1.h"„ 'L~ S .I~n..: ,V J CA~SCti! S11 1 -.~IfINAN L - St It a •..S''__: At , "Ir~ GH[AW/ 1 F~~y 2~"I.j 'MI ,Q ! ."xy1 YC - a ~•S~•_ ~I .K"`~`•'~ In -r : ~i `,~0. '-~`~,,~f\\ PALL 4t'~,LpiPAI ,r Y T Sib:a 1 rl \ tR W??? SI S_S •a c% 1_ '~7 _ yt rtr~•1 r rllla ~c 7 t• a ._~CI'"^S ~ .ey,V_W S -Y Q `i_ - V:. ) _ . a. F A I _ _ cwt iv N.LPtEttu Si V i.~.1•taY t^;., • jt. kk'7tf.Yl l1-` Ii.. •Y. 1 a • 5Y r - ` y, r /~f ,4a?: 'w•t~u 1'r':,.- l'L,pt~n~ 5.3 - ,y ~fr ~e Si 1 ~-L-:~. `i ~r"+,~ 'L~. -i ` I;CNIC •in ,L. { Z. ,.1 Y~, `S MK J I ,1 i; t K. i' ~ ' - ( .i)`~J~ S i • r''!=} ~ 1000 J , '.M 1 'ihl .!'.-{}~S~,~i f,.,. ai,>r• d•,~' S~? 1 >.u "jl I , I 1 •b.. :e , i~T` ~L..qr y y e+wlut Y.r M1 d SY__ _ _ _ q •ft ti~ 1 2 4 'x - a Sj N y•j:0=~ r~ Lr SFNiY 1N W r Mrr P 71 I i19i7 tlf 1 ' ` 0' r-v Y. % . t ~ • A~ \ 1L y f y h, v or or v r 't. - a s, f ~y h ,~Fp sl L I') ~r _ ,1~ •.j.>.._ ;t CIAYl1le _}i~ SY r < J _S ` 1 z~ rp r:11 Cf• f` ~ ' ~ rt < SY CF AFl FE elm 1 ~ STS AllA •,~5` •f' • a ♦ 6 d m A( F/L~ ^ t 't' t Fn t'1 • v x n I 1 rLa ~ 1 •..w. s' r~.' ; 1~\ 1 1 _ ` p 1 ~ .I :'~c w_ Mt ( iSt ~ .~_r. la Y . L,Y I IWRN ! 1 1:: ~1 Q _Y nom' QP 9, yo; 1• _ ri .t T 'ate .l. i•.• . K ,;Y. s rI AL, .I \ V g is Fc- tt y, 31 _-(Fink > s - , 3 f<i rte, ".1 v , i ,y ~ E' i ♦,ti Y ffi' , uA "R T•~c w $ s ® 3;}. i; ;J„r..:.'.'~.. 3 ` r. w` 1 L:. sY ti•, •'Yl, C` <`•C ~llq(~~ ty,4. f~ . j'a n t f- ti, ME AIM Sl ~ 7. H r ♦ ~ r~~qf, - C _Si_, y - \ ' r ` rt[!. w S fyM>,5 T) r1Y~ RAi11(RINS>-j _~':S'7.,, aY ,l.-F -7 -1lt .o;WtN j , <1 717 - .tr.-. w 1 AiM!Ai NC • Si _ 1 t 1 _ .Lt) .4ti i,(-.H/ m y FlHl1RS"Sii` K ~ G Lw - r -mod .1 `:y.. ~T~ +/1•E rfr , 1 a y? I t "2` I Z ar 1 } :1' • Ir~it, Y n i PR { t/ - r`•~ 1 \'FQ.F tr ly 5Y NFaer'l Ye It 1 f / `n ' A _ vL - L r-, t p • ` I , a Nf t E. h~ j SY~FfJxr~toi o yr'L^- r I V.• uw lr til ] ~.':;'^7S1 1 +~L , \V~ f5.~. t#. I Sy tYEIAKI 1111 1 - _ V yl„wi! 1- i` 1 • _ :1 `;_i _ _ . a pn 4` P rl _ S .I 1 •4 t. pt1{ 1 1 i~ ._y ".•cf t\~ IT '4'11y i•_ Y•r` >,K -'°¢'r ~'>.Yi Y - •~•(1 y'~f;: Sr •Z`,''L1'•:,/,4.~ S ` -i 5r`r s Fv _:t.1:.\ s- `ye ? L.._ _ w•Ir:. '1 rV ` 4 a fw `-,P.rr,~(i / r"S,• ~ \~Y\' ;1 `•~'ff °~i SY FLNI ~~t--•~ ~ti 4ti~.: !_~t-y. :r-•i ~ _S _ .f "ko~r"jSS lirttccFFr yy f }t<i _ 'I. r+ " • ( et.• MLIr ' l -Ir ' ' t FL, 1r i MAIN PAWL ti!'s MAI NUT 5'+o•L+Y 4 fir`. 1 \ r It C`_•.-\ e;1d11'{Imlw' ''~..`_''`"3A. --:1 "f M • _ 1 1... W l,lL tL .iw: v' St ' >r NATYIts vt .~°.L d cFN. _ l---I -[MS^iTC. , e-}}t 'T--j nrs> :.,sip'.- - _ . •;1 I a~ . J': F{ui \.1 N t;` 4 '1 f~ - M-e R \ . i {_YAa_FG 3 ._ra•.. . t a-: ••--mr.. 4~1- t•3 H~•'`"1'1,t, --1 1 T: A FAI0:0 ~ ~i ~c ~",as iii u- „v(,l Y, v . i rYe. -•~">y M: i._ S.r'i:r'. •j' ^r rr 1 ~SU F(a_ ' i L 4 r~r1 ~ w ~ t• , `w~a r A' 1 55•re : St $ v P ~ _>a t • i 1•Ljt eY i1 ~1.~.~a+• 1 , 'Lf < n., ~J,•`t Q d{`w CMP sM 14 r ! r..+•.r `I S f h• y' f~[ 'Ci t r!' , Y r~S7 Y'• SA!®BFAG s :AOY ~'Y fir IV " \,Vp QP -:1 St Z• fllff4_gODi7 4 1 ~ •1. 4 "w % rt (ENT CA USE ' ~'1 ' • ' ,Y, `Y`IWLr, t, fah ` t' NlltYll~ 'it N1ylY11V a`.,,- -liiSR/• ' / I - Rc ti r`iw . ilt,>i ~ M1 _TSW 11p1 MCDONALD •1"Y•• tv• 1AF.111 ~''L> S1 1 r -vra d m Sr `.57 S_ 1130M C a Y t - . E i • , ' - . )M i i Y \ '~..r Mir D~ _ Xt ~ _-~C4~ V ` ,L K l • F ` 1 y _ . ! N1MTA(M/1!Y Ut i ! I A?l --"-•t ^I< :r i z r!ntAiie ? i.~Sy_tFfYS' ~a ITA - :'-',j,~_s Kr,4r•~..~,,i .fit d`=~ k~QS' S ci 41FSY t It" n E INf °~'___a~l~f .i~ntr w=`'SY °4A - "1 L-,uJJ •i _ •t _ a• '1 'N 1• I~ 1r _1 ' / _ i fl - _S 1.F ••°5a 1 gI ~s L,:. r _ s_'1•, f > ; ! ~1y , r . r,`n,~.P~.-r pD ";.~'rf• ~ 'y a~! ~ ~ ■ R tt • If ~ 31G LtAip y5 L ` _ JR NS T A I.1y.~ur • - AO( I1C St i A au n -,,jL1 G I 1 i .z"'. '~+.t~Cf .:t Sfl s 6` _ BtLA _ _ - , - P 1- taMU q r I v nin R A a W ro v.~ 1 'L fIINAL_ 'Gl ` 1 • 1 ; 1 A ara CF Ir,ln tL 5_M ''1t _pja "w• cr .!t ' - 1 / _ - w~r n j _ a~ nwaL-c. a> Q._ jY f51S_5 •riU.l...~ z.: • , r { l i r • \ ~J~J,Ct E r~ ' ,7, ~ ~ j r. ~ SY !OW'/llY p1q _SY" xt v wHnum' A y ,w ~_1•~ AE7Nfff~YYY!JJIi ? Q ` 3, f:~iil .:1.-r. ti • ..sw a i ~ iw eAet,~` ST ~ ~~,.~eJ~~- _ ~ ~ t)UFF , ~ } 5 . / v -•k!F s,yteritta- -1 s ~ { a n.. ~ Is~r~_ ~ 1T3.e r, 1 EN ruual.r'•-M £ ~ -R.wA -I F - . l~, 1 if .St,'~~N• rcr 1`y. S-{ //\~Fr+6 `r~t i r da+a~\'~_ I" ' ~ t 1•. •v`Y'A'a ? r •1•L.{~l'Sb~'~ } ~ QY\«~- ~iC ~Y a ,y~WeaF A r'' M1„~ ,1 1 ~ [A? a . 'µ~f ?•-L~l.1: . :mot ; _ .~.'_S¢y,M,' .r[ ~ S ~1, }M Q~` a _ _ i/ ~+5^' I y~, e 1 Wi\iYi , a r r-` Sv av `ti~ ' v A 'S%5 1~ E`'• 1~ • VT • ! 171, r :J )i l ~ •~1 cnF ~.C r ! o' I i •--0q ~ d P[~ N.. d •er~ RlIAM' ~ _ t ' ~c f ei ~I SW w ,1 1 Lts ` !r F 'i ~ 1 - - S51 r f>tfrJfAM L , 1 1 \ ~7. • also= COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 10, 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: -October 10, 1992 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CDBG Needs PREVIOUS ACTION: none Assessment PREPARED BY: Duane Roberts DEPT HEAD OK CITY An OK j' QUESTED BY: Edward Murphy ISSUE BEFO THE COUNCIL Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Needs Inventory STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize submittal of the needs inventory. INFORMATION SUMMARY The County is in the process of preparing the 1994-1997 CDBG Plan. The plan will describe the community development needs of low and moderate income residents. Project applications, to be submitted in fall 1993, must be based on the needs identified in the 1994-1997 plan. Based on 1990 census block group data, only one area within the City is pre-qualified in terms of 51% or more of the residents having low or moderate incomes (see attached map). Four potentially eligible capital improvement needs have been identified in this area. These include construction of an eight foot-wide pedestrian pathway along Fanno Creek through the area; overlaying of several area streets; sidewalk, curb, and drainage improvements on Grant Ave; and various improvements to Woodard Park. Additionally, improvements to two City-owned facilities that house programs that serve an eligible clientele are identified. One facility is the Tigard Youth Services, Center, which is identified as needing renovation and expansion or replacement by a new facility. The other facility need identified is for exterior improvements to the Tigard Senior Center, including a gazebo, raised bed planters, and paved parking near these improvements. Also proposed is the acquisition/renovation of the Commercial St. fire station for use as a community service center. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. Not submit a needs statement. 2. Add or delete identified needs. FISCAL NOTES Authorizing the submittal of the needs assessment does not obligate the City in any way. Submission of the needs assessments is equivalent to a notification of an intent to apply for funds. Submission of an application to address an identified need would require separate Council action. Acceptance of a grant and appropriation of funds would require separate Budget Committee action. In order to increase the chances for project selection, match amounts in the form of in-kind or hard dollars will be recommended for consideration later, when project proposals are submitted. dr/needs 111 NIPPON: §!1511111111 imam REffmm ~1 / CORNELL L. k. It, u s Q Z !w, tvoinAVE. S. 0 Z 3 0 MI 0 r O A 5 x + S.W CLY dy (Oath A WATAINS tp wrl v~~ L N N I~ 8 to , / s \ ~ O tid ~ qj 41, >R ,~'~5 QROOKSI E 41~. r c ~ A~ ~•~-+r k~sr fy ~ Aid Oy 11. S 1{ 8 S.W. r Eln AVE • ~f off' A ~ r s 1cl ~iy s .f. r S.W. r 9S iN it 4 y 4 S_ 941n A E. S•, 4rf \ 4. ~t S. W. 94na AVE. ~oK y .4r (f B.W. 9EA0 AvE ' J+ S.W. 91H A Q. r` LW. 9!d AVE !.W 91 U Cr. 1 IV NEEDS ASSESSM ENTJPR®JECr IDENTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE (NOTE: Identify only one community development need and related project per form make additional forms if necessary. Use a separate form for each CDIBG program category in a pre-qualified area. For example, if a neighborhood revitalization project addresses several component needs, e.g. street and related sewer and sidewalk improvements in the same location within a pre-qualified area, this is considered to be one project) 1. Identification of respondent Name: Duane Roberts x Agency: City of Tigard Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard; OR 97223 Phone: (503) 639-4171 2. Program Category: X Neighborhood Revitalization Community Facility Public Services Housing _ Handicapped Access 3. Describe the need and the project proposed to address it. Please be as specific as possible. (Attach more details if there is not enough space here.) gonstruction of an eight foot wide pedestrian pathway along Fanno Creek through the 2goJect area is proposed. This would address the need for increased recreational opportunities and better pedestrian access through this neighborhood. t - 11 1 4. Identify the geographic service area to be served for this project: C _ County-wide _ City (identify): _ Unincorporated Washington County X Pre-qualified areas; Map No. 32 - Other. please specify Note: H this a neighborhood revitalization or community facilities project which is not located in a pre-qualified area, then you should submit a description of the area to be served and a map. (See Attachment III of this packet) 5. For the specific need you have identified, ;what is the estimated number o people that will be served directly by your proposed facility of activity? Please provide as much information as you can about the population to be served, and identify. your data sources. Total # # Low/Mod- crate Income Data Source a. Population to be served by proposed activity or facility 289. 147 1990 census b. Estimated # to be served by the proposal that are: Elderly (over age 62) 43 23 " Physically handicapped 15 10 Mentally handicapped N/A N/A Abused children N/A N/A Battered spouses N/A N/A Homeless persons 0 0 Illiterate persons N/A N/A Migrant farm workers 0 0 Members of a minority group (African- Amcrican, Native American, Asian American, Hispanic) 17 9 " 12 t 7. Why is this facility/activity needed or important to the population in need? Include any reports, statistics, or information which supports the need for this proposal. The project would be an important enhancement to the quality of the neighborhood and would improve access to Woodland Park, which is located in the center of this pre-qualified area. 8. a) What is the estimated total cost of the project(s) which you have identified? Ram $96,000 b) Are you assuming CDBG funds will pay 100% of this cost? Yes _ No x c) If no, what other funding sources will be used to share in these costs? City d) If yes, what is the anticipated CDBG share of the total cost? '80% 10. Is there any other information that you would like to make available regarding this need or activity/facility? 11. Name of organization which would sponsor this facility/activity.- City of Tigard Date approved by the sponsoring Board or Elected Body: (Attach minutes or record of action) Please return by November 15, 1992 to: Cogan Sharpe Cogan 10 NW Tenth Avenue, Penthouse Portland, OR 97209-3120 9232m#3.wp5 13 IV. DEEDS ASSESSMENT/PROJECT IDENTMCATION QUESTIONNAIRE (NOTE: Identify only one community development need and related project per form make additional forms if necessary. Use a separate form for each CD18C program category in a pre-qualified area. For example, if a neighborhood revitalization project addresses several component needs, e.g. street and related severer and sidewalk improvements in the same location within a pre-qualified area, this is considered to be one project) ' 1. Identification of respondent e Name: Duane Roberts Agency: City of Tigard Address: 13125, SW Hall: Boulevard Tigard,•OR 97223 Phone: (501_)_ 639-4171 I Program Category: i X Neighborhood Revitalization - Community Facility Public Services - Housing Handicapped Access 3. Describe the need and the project proposed to address it Please be as specific as possible. (Attach more details if there is not enough space here.) Grant Avenue is a walking route to two elementary scholls: C.F. Tigard and St. Anthony's. At resent, because Grant Avenue lacks sidewalks, school children must walk to school in the street or along the shoulder of the road. Sidewalk, curb and associated drainage and street widening . improvements are proposed to address the need for improved pedestrian 11 _ safety for school children and other-neighborhood residents. gill I t 7 I4. Identify the geographic service area to be served for this project: _ County-wide _ City (identify): Unincorporated Washington County g Pre-qualified areas; Map No. 32 Other. please specify :t Note: ~f th1$ vaiiiniiX ..aneighbwx hood r iz.,,Gd c ~.imereTitatxJt•.toia or ~'I•••••iLC~.i~i1L~GJ Project which is not located in a pre-qualified area, then you should submit a description of the area to be served and a map. (See Attachment III of this packet.) 5. For the specific need you have identified, what is the estimated number of people that will be served directly by your proposed facility of activity? Please provide as much information as you can about the population to be served, and identify your data sources. Total # # LOW/Mod- erate Income Data Source a. Population to be served by proposed activity or facility 289 147 1990 census b. Estimated # to be served by the proposal that are: Elderly (over age 62) 43 23 " Physically handicapped 15 10 Mentally handicapped N/A N/A j Abused children N/A N/A Battered spouses N/A N/A Homeless persons 0 0 Illiterate persons N/A N/A W*rant farm weikers 0 0 Members of a minority group (African- American, Native American, Asian American, hispanic) 17 9 12 7. Why is this facility/activity needed or important to the population in need? Include any reports, statistics, or information which supports the need for this proposal. This older neighborhood developed without sidewalks. A safe pedestrian route through the neighborhood is needed, especially for children walking to school. 8. a) What is the estimated total cost of the project(s) which you have identified? $350.000 b) Are you assuming CDBG funds will pay 100% of this cost? Yes _ No x c) If no, what other funding sources will be used to share in these costs? City d) If yes, what is the anticipated CDBG share of the total cost? 60% 10. Is there any other information that you would like to make available regarding this need or activity/facility? 11. Name of organization which would sponsor this facility/activity. City of Tigard Date approved by the sponsoring Board or Elected Body: (Attach minutes or record of action) Please return by November 15, 1992 to: Cogan Sharpe Cogan 10 NW Tenth Avenue, Penthouse Portland, OR 97209-3120 sznm#aaps . 13 1 r IV. NEEDS ASSESSMIENT/PROJECT IDENTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE (NOTE: Identify only one community development need and related project per form - make additional forms if necessary. Use a separate form for each CDBG program category in a pre-qualified area. For example, if a neighborhood revitalization project addresses several component needs, e.g. street and related sewer and sidewalk improvements in the same location within a pre-qualified area, this is considered to be one project.) 1. Identification of respondent Name: Duane Roberts Agency: City of Tigard Address: 13125 SW Hall ,Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: (503) 639-4171 2. Program Category: x Neighborhood Revitalization _ Community Facility Public Services Housing Handicapped Access 3. Describe the need and the project proposed to address it. Please be as specific as possible. (Attach more details if there is not enough space here.) The streets within this neighborhood are old and deteriorating, with cracking and alligation evident in many places. overlaying of 5,200 lineal feet of roadway is proposed. 11 . r 4. Identify the geographic service area to be served for this project: County-wide _ City (identify): Unincorporated Washington County x Pre-qualified areas; Map No. 32 Other. please specify Note: If this a neighborhood revitalization or commi-in r y fiae ities project which is not located in a pre-qualified area, then you should submit a description of the area to be served and a map. (See Attachment III of this packet.) 5. For the specific need you have identified, what is the estimated number of people that will be served directly by your proposed facility of activity? Please provide as much information as you can about the population to be served, and identify your data sources. Total Low/Mod- crate Income Data Source a. Population to be served by proposed activity or facility 289. 147 1990 census b. Estimated # to be served by the proposal that are: Elderly (over age 62) 43 23 " Physically handicapped 15 10 " Mentally handicapped N/A N/A Abused children N/A N/A Battered spouses N/A N/A Homeless persons 0 0 Illiterate persons N/A N/A Migrant farm workers 0 0 Members of a minority group (African- American, Native American, Asian American, Hispanic) 17 9 r { 12 7. why is this facility/activity needed or important to the population in need? Include any reports, statistics, or information which supports the need for this proposal. Overlaying is needed to prevent the further deterioration of several streets within the project area. NNE 8. a) What is the estimated total cost of the project(s) which you have identified? $88,000 b) Are you assuming CDBG funds will pay 100% of this cost? Yes _ No x c) If no, what other funding sources will be used to share in these costs? City d) If yes, what is the anticipated CDBG share of the total cost? 80% 3 10. Is there any other information that you would like to make available regarding this need or activity/facility? 11. Name of organization which would sponsor this facility/activity: City of Tigard Date approved by the sponsoring Board or Elected Body. (Attach minutes or record of action) Please return by November 15, 1992 to: Cogan Sharpe Cogan C 10 NW Tenth Avenue, Penthouse Portland, OR 97209-3120 vzum#3.%-ps 13 IV. NEEDS ASSESSMENT/PROJECT IDENTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE (NOTE: Identify only one community development need and related project per form - make additional forms if necessary. Use a separate form for each CDBG program category in a pre-qualified area. For example, if a neighborhood revitalisation project addresses several component needs, e.g. street and related sewer and sidewalk improvements in the same location within a pre-qualified area, this is considered to be one project.) I. Identification of respondent Name: Duane Roberts Agency: City of Tigard Address: '13125-SW Hall Boulevard Tigard; OR 97223 Phone: (503) 639-4171 2 Program Category: x Neighborhood Revitalization Community Facility Public Services _ Housing - Handicapped Access 3. Describe the need and the project proposed to address it Please be as specific as possible. (Attach more details if there is not enough space here.) Woodard Park is a neighborhood park located within pre-qualified area 32. .At present, a slide and a swing set are the only facilities in the park. -installation of additional playground equipment, a basketball court, and a picnic shelter are needed to increase the useability of the park for- neighborhood residents. Landscape construction, including installation of 11 an irrigation system is needed to develop the park to city standards. i 4. Identify the geographic service area to be served for this project: _ County-wide _ City (identify): Unincorporated Washington County x Pre-qualified areas; Map No. 32 - Other. please specify Note: If this a neighborhood revitalization or community facilities project which is not . located in a pre-qualified area, then you should submit a description of the area to be served and a map. (See Attachment III of this packet.) 5. For the specific need you have identified, what is the estimated number of people that will be served directly by your proposed facility of activity? Please provide as much information as you can about the population to be served, and identify. your data sources. erate Income Data Source q2889 tal # Low/Mod- a. Population to be served by proposed activitfacility 147 1990 census b. Estimated # to be served by the proposal that are: Elderly (over age 62) 43 23 Physically handicapped lr-y 10 Mentally handicapped N/A N/A Abused children N/A N/A Battered spouses N/A N/A Homeless persons 0 0 Illiterate persons N/A N/A Migrant farm workers 0 0 Members of a minority group (African- American, Native American, Asian American, Hiispanic) 17 9 n 12 f C 7, Why is this facility/activity needed or important to the population in need? Include any reports, statistics, or information which supports the need for this proposal. Upgrading of Woodard Park is needed to improve the livability of this neighborhood g. a) What is the estimated total cost of the project(s) which you have identified? $45,000 b) Are you assuming CDBG funds will pay 104% of this cost? Yes _ No x c) If no, what other funding sources will be used to share in these costs? City d) If yes, what is the anticipated CDBG share of the total cost? 80% 10. Is there any other information that ,you would like to make available regarding this need or activity jfacility? 11. Name of organization which would sponsor this facility/activity. City of Tigard Date approved by the sponsoring Board or Elected Body: (Attach minutes or record of action) Please return by November 15, 1992 to: Cogan Sharpe Cogan 1O.NW Tenth Avenue, Penthouse Portland, OR 97209-3124 vzumolwps 13 IV. NEEDS ASSESSMENT/PROJECT IDENTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE (NOTE: Identify only one community development need and related project per form make additional forms if necessary. Use a separate form for each CDBG program category in a pre-qualified area. For example, if a neighborhood revitalization project addresses several component needs, e.g. street and related sewer and sidewalk improvements in the same location within a pre-qualified area, this is considered to be one project-) I - 1. Identification of respondent Name: Duane Roberts 1 Agency: City of Tigard Address: 13125 SW Hall: Boulevard Tigard,'OR 97223 Phone: (503) 639-4171 2. Program Category: ! Neighborhood Revitalization x Community Fatality Public Services - Housing - Handicapped Access .3. Describe the need and the project proposed to address it_ Please be as specific as possible. (Attach more details if there is not enough space here.) Exterior improvements to-the Tigard Senior Center are needed to provide outdoor recreation opportunities for the elderly. The needed improvements include a gazebo, raised bed planters and a paved parking area on the r south or Fanno Creek side of the building near the proposed landscape improvements. 11 . i 1 4. Identify the geographic service area to be served for this project: _ County-wide a City (identify): Unincorporated Washington County Pre-qualified areas; Map No. X Other. please specify Tigard and Metzger areas. Note: If this a neighborhood revitalization or community facilities project which is not located in a pre-qualified area, then you should sub*_mit a description of the area to be served and a map. (See Attachment III of this packet., 5. For the specific need you have identified, what is the estimated number of people that will be served directly by your proposed facility of activity? Please provide as much information as you can about the population to be served, and identify your data sources. Total # # Low/Mod- erate Income Data Source a. Population to be served by proposed activity or Loaves & Fishes facility 4,500. 4,000 Files b. Estimated # to be served by the . proposal that are: 1 El 4,500 1 derly (over age 62) 4,000 Physically handicapped 2,100 1,500 Mentally handicapped N/A N/A Abused children 0 0 ` Battered spouses N/A N/A Homeless persons 0 0 Illiterate persons N/A N/A Migx ant farm workers 0 0 Members of a minority group (African American, Native American, Asian American, mac) NA NA ` 12 10101 MEN= -MMENEVaRNMEM I 7. Why is this facility/activity needed or important to the population in need? Include any reports, statistics; or information which supports the need for this proposal. The proposed improvements would provide outdoor recreational opportunities for the elderly. The raised bed planters would be used by the handicapped for gardening and flower planting. 8. a) What is the estimated total cost of the project(s) which you have identified? $80,000 b) Are you assuming CDBG funds will pay 100% of this cost? Yes _ No x c) If no, what other funding sources will be used to share in these costs? City- d) If yes, what is the anticipated CDBG share of the total cost? 80% 10. Is there any other information that you would like to make available regarding this need or activity/facility? 11. Name of organization which would sponsor this facility/activity: City of Tigard Date approved by the sponsoring Board or Elected Body: (Attach minutes or record of action) Please return by November 15, 1992 to: Cogan Sharpe Cogan 10 NW Tenth Avenue, Penthouse Portland, OR 97209-3120 9M m/3.wp5 13 11 11101 NO l~Ill lllisi IV. NEEDS ASSESSMENT/PROJECT IDENTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE (NOTE: Identify only one community development need and related project per form - make additional forms if necessary. Use a separate form for each CDBG program category in a pre-qualified area. For -example, if a neighborhood revitalization project addresses several component needs, e.g. street and related sewer and sidewalk improvements in the same location within a pre-qualified area, this is considered to be one project.) i. Identification of respondent Name: Duane Roberts Agency: City of Tigard Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, -'OR 97223" Phone: (503) 639-4171 2 Program Category: _ Neighborhood Revitalization x Community Facility Public Services _ Housing Y , Handicapped Access 3. Describe the need and the project proposed to address it. Please be as specific as possible. (Attach more details if there is not enough space here.) The Tigard Youth Services Center houses programs that serve youth residing in the Tigard-Tualatin area. The existing 45-year old facility is in poor repair. The rehabilitation and expansion of the existing _building or the acquisition/renovation of a new facility is proposed. . 11 MEMNON= 4. Identify the geographic service area to be served for this project: _ County-wide _ City (identify): _ Unincorporated Washington County Pre-qualified areas; Map No. X Other: please specify Tigard-Tualatin School District attendance area. (map attached) Note: if this a neighborhood re.dtalimfion or community d t es project which is not located in a pre-qualified area, then you should submit a description of the area to be served and a map. (See Attachment III of this packet) 5. For the specific need you have identified, what is the estimated number of people that will be served directly by your proposed facility of activity? Please provide as much information as you can about the population to be served, and identify your data sources. Total # # Low/Mod- crate income Data Source a. Population to be served by proposed activity or faality 165 115 case files b. Estimated # to be served by the proposal that are: Elderly (over age 62) 0 0 " Physically handicapped 3 N/A Menially handicapped 17 N/A Abused children 80 N/A " Battered spouses 20 N/A " Homeless persons 0 0 Illiterate persons N/A N/A Migrant farm workers 0 0 " .Rim Members of a minority group (African- American, Native American, Asian American, " Easpanic) 2 N/A . c- 12 . • 7. why is this facility/activity needed or important to the population in need? Include any reports, statistics, or information which supports the need for this proposal. The Tigard Youth services Center is the focal point of social services to youth living in the Tigard-Tualatin area. 8. a) What is the estimated total cost of the project(s) which you have identified? $35,000 - $150,000 b) Are you assuming CDBG funds will pay 100% of this cost? Yes No x c) If no, what other funding sources will be used to share in these costs? City and cpmmunity youth services of Washington County. i d) If yes, what is the anticipated CDBG share of the total cost? j 80% 10. Is there any. other information that you would like to make available regarding this need or activity/facility? 11. Name of organization which would sponsor this facility/activity: City of Tigard Date approved by the sponsoring Board or Elected Body: (Attach minutes or record of action) Please return by November 15, 1992 to: Cogan Sharpe Cogan 10 NW Tenth Avenue, Penthouse Portland, OR 97209-3120 9n2M#3%-p5 13 i' r IV. NEEDS ASSESSNiENT/PROJrECT IDENTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE (NOTE: Identify only one community development need and related project per form make additional forms if necessary. Use a separate form for each CDBG program category in a pre-qualified area. For example, if a neighborhood revitalization project addresses several component needs, e.g. street and related sewer and sidewalk improvements in the same location within a pre-qualified area, this is considered to be one project.) 1. Identification of respondent Name: Duane Roberts Agency: City of Tigard Address: 13125 SW Ha11:Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: (503) 639-4171 2. Program Category: Neighborhood Revitalization x Community Facility Public Services - Housing Handicapped Access 3. Describe the need and the project proposed to address it. Please be as specific as possible. (Attach more details if there is not enough space here.) Social service organizations and self-help groups serving the south County area, such.as Neighborshare, Headstart, and alcohol and drug recovery support groups, lack adequate and reliable office, classroom and meeting space. The acquisition/ renovation of a 9,000 sq. ft. abandoned fire station for use as a multi-purpose service center to addreos this nlei d is proposed. 4. Identify the geographic service area to be served for this project: _ County-wide City (identify): - Tigard and environs _ Unincorporated Washington County Pre-qualified areas; Map No. _ Other. please specify Note: If this a neighborhood revitalization or community facilities project which is not located in a pre-qualified area, then you should submit a description of the area to be served and a map. (See Attachment III of this packet.) a 5. For the specific need you have identified, what is the estimated number of people that will be served directly by your proposed facility of activity? Please provide as much information as you can about the population to be served, and identify your data sources. Total # # Law/Mod- crate Income Data Source a. Population to be served by proposed activity or fa dy 7,000 61800 W A C O b. Estimated # to be served by the proposal that are: Elderly (over age 62) 11000 900 Physically handicapped 200 Mentally handicapped N/A Abused children N/A Battered spouses N/A Homeless persons 650 Illiterate persons N/A Migrant farm workers 0 , Members of a minority group (African- American, Native American, Asian-Amc ican, Hispanic) N/A 12 Emmons= 7. Why is this facility/activity needed or important to the population in need? Include any reports, statistics, or information which supports the need for this proposal. A multi-use service center is needed to eliminate the uncertainty for non-profit organizations of relying.on donated space and would increase the availability of programs and activities serving the area's low and moderate income population. 8. a) What is the estimated total cost of the project(s) which you have identified? $500,000 b) Are you assuming CDBG funds will pay 100% of this cost? Yes _ No x c) If no, what other funding sources will be used to share in these costs? City. d) If yes, what is the anticipated CDBG share of the total cost? 80% 10. Is there any, other information that you would like to make available regarding this need or activity/facility? 11. Name of organization which would sponsor this facility/activity. City of Tigard Date approved by the sponsoring Board or Elected Body. (Attach minutes or record of action) Please return by November 15, 1992 t-,. Cogan Sharpe Cogan 10 NW Tenth Avenue, Penthouse ' Portland, OR 97209-3120 7Mm#3.ap5 13 IMMEW 11,11! 15 1:1, 1 1 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM AMW CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 10. 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: 10/28/92 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Garrett's Annex. PREVIOUS ACTION None ZCA 92-0006 Zone Change Annexat o IIA01 PREPARED BY: Victor Adonri DEPT HEAD OR ~ CITY ADMIN OR REQUESTED BY: Ed Murphy ISSUE RE THE COUNCIL Should the City Council forward 'a request for annexation of one parcel consisting of approximately 2.44 acres located at 12040 SW Bull Mountain Road to the Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution and ordinance to forward the annexation to the Boundary Commission including the right-of-way of S.W Bull Mountain Road, and to assign a zoning designation of R-4.5 to the property. INFORMATION SUMMARY This annexation request consists of one parcel totaling 2.44 acres that is contiguous to the City of Tigard on SW Bull Mountain Road. The owner of the property requested annexation in order to partition the parcel and obtain sanitary sewer service. The applicant requests annexation of his property via the "expedited method". (The "expedited method" requires no public hearing by the Boundary Commission, and will allow annexation approval within 28 days, instead of the customary 45 days). Notices were given to property owners .4ithin 250 feet of the subject property. There has been no response from neighboring property owners. Staff is recommending that approximately 420 feet of S.W. Bull Mountain Road be included in the annexation. This is suggested to create a more consistent boundary, aid in police patrol and enable the future annexation of island property. NOTE: The annexation of this property will result in the creation of a two lot island on Bull Mountain Road, both lots being under the single ownership of Mr. and Mrs. Lasselle. The Lasselles were contacted by mail, and subsequently responded verbally they will not object to annexation into the City of Tigard in the future, but are not interested in initiating annexation of their properties at this time. Since the owners will be in an island, the City can initiate annexation of the two lots at any time. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt the attached resolution and ordinance to forward the annexation to the Boundary Commission including the right-of-way of S.W. Bull Mountain Road, and assign a zoning designation of R-4.5 to the property. 2. Deny the proposal. FISCAL NOTES The City will pay the Boundary Commission fee of $240 for annexation. The current tax assessment is $243,750 The City could increase its tax base 4 )y approximately $472. (Assessed value multiplied by City tax base portion of pax rate of $1.94/1000 as of 1/1/90 = $472.87). ! Y STAFF REPORT November 10, 1992 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TIGARD TOWN HALL 13125 S.W. HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. CASE: Zone Change Annexation 92-06 REQUEST: To annex one parcel consisting of 2.44 acres of unincorporated Washington County into the City of Tigard, and for zone change from Washington County R-6 (Residential, 6 units per acre) to City of Tigard R- 4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre). The applicant requests that the expedited process be used. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Washington County Residential, 6 units per acre. ZONING DESIGNATION: Washington County R-6 (Residential, 6 units per acre). APPLICANT(S): Nicholas and Lynette Garrett 12040 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, Oregon 97224 OWNER(S): Nicholas and Lynette Garrett 12040 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, Oregon 97224 LOCATION: 12040 SW Bull Mountain Road. (WCTM 2S1 1OBC, Tax Lot 1400) 2. Background Information + No previous applications have been reviewed by the City relating to this property. 3. Vicinity Information Two properties to the north of the site are in Washington county and zoned for single family residential development. one other property to the north is in the City of Tigard and is zoned R-2 (Residential, 2 units per acre). Properties to the east are in the City of Tigard and zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre). All properties to the west are single family lots in Washington County. Properties to the south are in the city of Tigard and are zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre) 4. Site Information and Proposal Description The property to be annexed has one single family residence with the remainder of the property undeveloped. The property is primarily covered with some trees. The applicants requested that their parcel be annexed into the City of Tigard in order to partition the parcel and connect to sanitary C ZCA 92-06 Staff Report 1 d sewer line. An existing sewer line is located on the southerly portion of the parcel to be annexed. 5. Agency and NPO Comments Tigard Water District, Tualatin Valley Fire District, General Telephone and Electronics, NW Natural Gas, Tigard School District ' 23J, Portland General Electric, and Metro Area Communications have reviewed the proposal and have offered no objections or comments. 6. Police Department Consideration The Police Department has reviewed the proposal and have offered the following comments. The roadway on Bull Mountain Road north of the property to be annexed should be included with this annexation so as to promote effective police patrol of the area. The owners of the two lots to the north should also be approached for annexation. (Both issues have been addressed by the planning staff). mma 7. Engineering Department Consideration ZX= The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and have offered the following comments: The Engineering Department suggests that a 420 foot street right-of-way of S.W. Bull Mountain Road be included with this annexation. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, Citizen Involvement; 6.4.1, Developing Area; 10.1.1, Service Delivery Capacity; and 10.1.2, Boundary Criteria and chapters 18.136, j Annexations; and 18.138, Established/Developing Area Classification of the Tigard Community Development Code. The planning staff has. determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: 1. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and Community Planning Organization as well as surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the request. 2. Plan Policy 6.4.1 is satisfied because the area to be annexed is designated as a developing area on the development standards map. 3. Plan Policy 10.1.1 is satisfied because the City has conducted the Washington County Urban Services Study which includes the subject property. This study indicates that adequate services are available in the vicinity and may be extended to accommodate the subject property. 4. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the annexation is a first step in eliminating an island and an irregular boundary that makes it difficult for the police in an emergency situation to respond in a timely manner. Inclusion of the street right-of-way of Bull Mountain Road will make police patrol more efficient and effective. C ZCA 92-06 Staff Report 2 i i r e The land is located within Tigard's Active Planning Area, and adequate service capacities can be made available to accommodate the eventual development of the property as noted above. A two lot Island will be created north of Bull Mountain Road, and northwest of the property to be annexed. The City intends to annex both lots sometime in the future. i The planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: 3 1. Section 18.136.030 of the Code is met because all facilities and services can be made available, the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies discussed above have been satisfied and the property has been determined to be a developing area in accordance with the criteria in Chapter 18.138 of the Code. .b s. Since the property is within Tigard's Active Planning Area, the zone designation shall follow the City's comprehensive plan map designation for low density use. The most appropriate zone is R-4.5 with a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. s 2. Chapter 18.138 of the Code is satisfied because the property meets the definition for a developing area and is designated as such on the development standards area map. a C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the findings noted above, the planning staff recommends approval of ZCA 92-06, including the street right-Of-way of S'.W. Bull Mountain Road. Staff further suggests that City should consider annexing the properties in the island that will be created as a result of this annexation. PREPARED BY: 1 Victor Adonri, A tant Planner i i Y i r r i ZCA 92-06 Staff Report 3 i i MOM Fam a.- -CJ- - 21so-i - (5o? j rap~o- y UP fir. xb RECEIVED PLANNING _ AUG 17 1992 i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 10, 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: October 27, 1992 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Amendment to TMC PREVIOUS ACTION: 10.28.020 Re latin parking-of 1 vehicles PREPARED BY: Ron Goodpaster DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK, REQUESTED BY: Ron Goodpaster ____`_`___-____ISSUE BEFO THE COUNCIL Approve attached amendment to existing Tigard Municipal Code 10.28.020, specifying prohibited parking and regulating the parking of large vehicles on public streets. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. INFORMATION SUMMARY We currently do not have existing language that allows us to resolve complaints of large vehicles (motor homes, boats, trailers, etc.) parked on the street. These types of vehicles cause visibility and traffic flow hazards. The amendments also give us the ability to deal with complaints we receive regarding vehicles for sale on public streets and brings our definitions in line with current state law. This amendment will also eliminate several paragraphs in the ordinance dealing with motor bus layovers that no longer apply because of the new transit mall. We will issue warnings and try to get as much publicity as we can regarding this ordinance during the 30-day waiting period before it becomes effective if passed by the Council. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. Do not accept amendment 2. Approve amendment FISCAL NOTES These changes will save us considerable time. Officers will be able to resolve these problems on initial response without call backs. Dollar amount hard to identify. IN! --NONE 111, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 92- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY UPDATING DEFINITIONS; REPEALING SECTION 10.28.020; SPECIFYING PROHIBITED PARKING; AND REGULATING THE PARKING OF LARGE VEHICLES ON PUBLIC STREETS WHEREAS, the Oregon Vehicle Code has been renumbered, and certain terms re-defined; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds offensive advertising or sales of merchandise from vehicles parked on public streets; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that maintenance or storage of vehicles on public streets is offensive and can create a traffic hazard; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the parking of trailers, campers, motor homes and other similar vehicles on public streets or public property can create a traffic hazard and obstruction; and WHEREAS, the Tigard Municipal Code must reflect all of the above changes; now, therefore, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 10.28.010 of the Tigard Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 10.28.010 Definitions. (a) "Parking" or "parked" for purposes of the city motor vehicle code, means the stopping or standing of any vehicle upon any street or highway within the city, except for the purpose of and while actually engaged in loading or unloading passengers or freight, or in obedience to traffic regulations or traffic signs or signals. (b) It is unlawful for any person to park or stop any vehicle for a longer period of time than that designated by official signs, parking meters, or other markings placed by or under authority of the city. "Parking time limit" includes the aggregate of time of all stopping or standing of the same vehicle on the same side of the street within a space of three hundred lineal feet measured along the curb-line and between intersections; and the parking, standing or stopping of any vehicle within such expanse shall not exceed the designated time limit during any three-hour period. (c) For purposes of this chapter, the definitions of the following terms as used herein shall conform to the following ORS sections which by reference herein are made a part of this chapter: ORDINANCE No. 92- Page 1 (1) "Camper" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.180. (2) "Highway" or "street" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.305. (3) "Mobile home" is defined as set forth in ORS 801.340. (4) "Motor bus" is defined as a Commercial Bus as set forth in ORS 801.200. (5) "Motor home" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.350. (6) "Motor truck" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.355. (7) "Recreational Vehicle" is defined as set forth in ORS 446.003. (8) "Trailer" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.560. (9) "Travel Trailer" is defined as set forth in ORS 801.565. (10) "Truck Tractor" is defined as set forth in ORS Section 801.575. SECTION 2: Section 10.28.020 of the Tigard Municipal Code, specifying purposes for which parking is prohibited, is hereby repealed. SECTION 3: Chapter 10.28 is amended by adding Section 10.28.22 to read as follows: "Section 10.28.022 Purposes for which parking is prohibited. No person shall park a vehicle on the right-of-way of any highway, or upon any public street or public way within the city limits for any of the following purposes: (1) Advertising, selling or offering merchandise for sale; (2) Washing, greasing or repairing such vehicle except as may be necessitated by emergency; (3) Storage, for any period of more than twenty-four hours, except that this subsection shall be subject to the limits elsewhere prescribed in the city motor vehicle code or as may be prescribed by the Oregon State Motor Vehicle Code. It shall constitute prima facie evidence of storage of a vehicle if the same is not moved for a period of twenty-four (24) hours. The continuity of the time shall not be deemed broken by movement of the vehicle elsewhere on the block unless the movement removes the vehicle from the block where it was located before it is returned. Any vehicle mentioned in this subsection parked on the right-of-way of any highway, or upon any public street or public way within the city in violation of this subsection may be treated as an abandoned vehicle and the provisions of Chapter 7.60 shall apply." ORDINANCE No. 92- Page 2 I SECTION 4: Section 10.28.030 is amended to read as follows: Section 10.28.030 Truck, trailer, bus, camper, motor home recreational vehicle and boat restrictions No person shall at any time park or leave standing a house trailer, motor bus, motor truck, tractor trailer, truck tractor, motor home, boat, vehicle with camper, recreational vehicle, or trailer, as defined in section 10.28.010 (c), whether attended or unattended, on any improved public highway, public street or other public way within the city limits, for a period greater than thirty (30) minutes, between the hours of one minute past twelve a.m. and six a.m. Tractor Trailer, Truck Trailer. No person shall at any time park a tractor trailer or truck trailer as described in Section 10.28.010(c) unattended on any improved public highway, public street or other public way within the city limits. SECTION 5: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posted by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 1992. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: This day of , 1992. Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor Approved as to form: i 3 City Attorney 1 Date A I ORDINANCE No. 92- Page 3 i r i C~u.vlei l a, , ~ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 10. 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: October 27, 1992 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Amendment to TMC PREVIOUS ACTION: 7.60.030 (Removal of Abandon Vehicles PREPARED BY: Ron Goodpaster DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Ron Goodpaster ISSTIF, BEF01 THE COUNCIL Approve attached amendment to existing Tigard Municipal Code 7.60.030, procedure for removal of an abandoned vehicle. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. INFORMATION SUMMARY Frequently people will move their vehicles a short distance after it has been tagged as abandoned and that then requires us to start our process over again. This amendment will give us a definition of what a stored vehicle is and will require movement of an abandoned vehicle 500 feet. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. Do not accept amendment 2. Approve as proposed FISCAL NOTES This will save us considerable time. Processing an abandoned vehicle requires several formal processes and time frames; and with this amendment, we will be able to identify and remove abandoned vehicles quicker. C. ;3 10 a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 92- AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 7.60.030 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROCEDURE FOR REMOVAL OF AN ABANDONE -tlCet.~ ~ 1 HICLE. c"`_ 14~R Q WHEREAS, a police department request that an abandoned vehicle be 3 removed often results in the vehicle being moved a few feet, requiring further police action; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to amend the Code to aid in the removal of abandoned vehicles; now, therefore, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 7.60.010(1) (c), (d), and (e) are amended to read as follows: (c) The vehicle appears to be wrecked, partially dismantled or junked, or (d) The vehicle appears to have been stored. For the purpose of this section, "stored" is defined in 10.28.022(3) of this code, or (e) The vehicle has remained in the same position, or within the 500 foot radius of its earlier position, for a period of 30 days. SECTION 2: Section 7.60.030 is amended to read as follows: 7.60.030 Removal--Procedure. An abandoned vehicle which remains in the same position, or remains within a 500 foot radius of its earlier position for a period of five days (holidays, Saturdays, and Sundays not included), after an owner has been requested to remove it or after notice has been served as required by Section 7.60.02.0, shall be removed by the police department using their own personnel, equipment or facilities or those of others. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. Page 1 - ORDINANCE No. 92- I i i 13 CouncAL U.9 -0V-M *7•3 r t UAM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON i COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 10. 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: October 27, 1992 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Amendment to PREVIOUS ACTION: TMC 2.28 Police Reserves /Ta Al PREPARED BY: Ron Goodpaster E DEPT ?3E_nD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Ron Goodpaster ! ISSUE B®rrn,17V HE COU NCIL s t Approve attached amendment to existing Tigard Municipal Code 2.28, Police Reserves. STAFF RECOMMENDATION z Staff recommends amendment be approved. INFORMATION SUMMARY The amendment requires the City to furnish uniforms, which has been a common practice for several years, allows compensation to be paid to reserve C officers if called out by the Chief of Police for an emergency, and requires the City to provide worker's compensation insurance for work related injuries and have them covered under the City's liability policy, as long as they are acting within the scope and responsibility of their position. ; The amendment also allows the reserves to contract their services to public or private entities for base police officer pay. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES i 1. Not to accept proposed amendment 2. Approve amendment FISCAL NOTES Fiscal impact would be minimal since old uniforms are given to the reserves. Any additional money needed would come out of existing budget. i i 1 i