City Council Packet - 11/06/1989
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item should sign on the appropriate
NOVEMBER 6, 1989 5:30 PH sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available,
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's
TIGARD, OREGON 972223 Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or
less. Longer matters can be set for a future
Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the
City Administrator.
5:30 o COUNCIL WORKSHOP (5:30 p.m.) - Agenda Review
6:30 o STUDY SESSION
- Workshop with Tualatin Valley Economic Development Corporation
7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING
1.1 Call to Order
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please)
3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
3.1 Approve Council Minutes: September 19, 25, 1989; October 9, 1989.
3.2 Receive and File: Council Calendar
3.3 Approve Final Order - Camprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 89-08 Zone
Change 89-08 Gross; NPO #7 - Resolution No. 89-
3.4 Authorize Issuance of General Obligation Improvement Bonds-
Resolution No. 89-
4. PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANA CPA 89-07 ZONE CHANGE 89-
07 METZGER-FMS/ROCKWELL NPO #5 A request for a Ccuprehensive Plan
Amendment from Commercial Professional to Medium-High Density
Residential and a Zone Omnge from C-P (Cxemlercial Professional) to R-25
(Residential, 25 units/acre) for approximately 5 acres. LpCATION: West
side of SW 72nd Avenue, between SW Varns Street and SW Fir Street (Wcam
2S1 1DB, Tax Lacs 800 & 801, 2S1, 1DC, Tax Lot 3600).
o Public Hearing Continued from October 23, 1989
o Declarations or Challenges
o Summation by Ca nminity Development Staff
o Public Testimony: Proponents, ' Opponents, Cross Mmmination
o Reccmmendation by Community Development Staff
o Council Questions or cannents
o Public Hearing Closed
o Consideration by Council
• COUNCIL AGENDA, - NOVEMBER 6, 1989 - Page 1
5. PUBLIC HFARIM - ZONE ORDINANCE AN~ ZOA 89-03 CITY OF TIGARD
An amerxbient of Chapter 18.90, Environmental Performance Standards, to
adopt temporary Oregon Administrative Rules related to construction
activities within the Tualatin River basin. Oregon Environmental
Quality Coamussion directives require the new rules to be in effect by
January 1, 1990. Location: City-wide.
0 Public Hearing Opened
o Declarations or Challenges
o Summation by Community Development Staff
o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
o Pjecotmnendation by Ct m unity Development Staff
0 Council Questions or Comments
o Public Hearing Closed
6. PUBLIC HEARING - PACIFIC CORPORATE CENTER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Consideration of an amerxtnent to Ordinance No. 89-14 creating the
Pacific Corporate Center Local Improvement District. The purpose of the
proposed amendment is to correct the legal description of the District
boundaries as set forth in Exhibit "A" to said ordinance. More
particularly, the proposed amendment will reduce the width of the
norther 475 feet of the district luuediately south of Bonita Road from
87.5 feet to 72.5 feet. This proposed correction of the legal
description will be the sole issue for consideration and action by the
Council.
o Public Hearing Opened
o Declarations or Challenges
o Summation by Cxm=nity Development Staff
O Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Emmination
o Recommendation by Comamity Development Staff
o Council Questions or Co menu
O Public Hearing Closed
7. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), (h) & (i) to
discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending
litigation issues, and City Administrator's evaluation.
9. AA70000TEN '
cca1107
C COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 6, 1989 - Page 2
i - 3 1
rr TIGARD CITY COUNCIL i
1.
MEETM NIINfTMS - NOVEMBER 6, 1989
1. FIRL CUL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors Carolyn Eadon,
Valerie Johnson, Joe Kasten, and John Schwartz. Staff Present: Patrick
Reilly, City Administrator; Irene Ertell, Librarian; Ed Murphy,
Community Development Director (arrived at 6:10 p.m.); Liz Newton,
Community Involvement Coordinator; and Catherine Wheatley, City
Recorder.
2. STUDY SESSION:
a. Library Discussion: City Administrator Reilly, Librarian Ertell,
and Council discussed the upcoming County Library Levy targeted for
the March election. The City of Tigard participates in a county-
wide cooperative library service; funding for this program is
presently calculated through a formula based on each city's i.
assessed valuation. The Cooperative Library Advisory Board (CT-AB)
has been considering recoamnen bxxj to the County Board of
Commissioners changing the formula to distribute funds based on
circulation. This latter formula would significantly impact the
City of Tigard - preliminary estimates indicate that the City
would receive about $100,000 less than with the assessed valuation
formula.
Two main issues were discussed by council:
r
1. Does the City support the proposed levy amount (approximately
double the amount currently being collected)? +
2. Does the City wish to pursue the concerns over the potential s`
change in the distribution formula?
t
Council consensus was that while they were disconcerted about the
levy increase, the proposed change to the distribution formula was
the primary concern. The philosophical question of marketing i.
versus reference was noted; that is, should libraries be
participating in programs such as video distribution to increase
circulation numbers or should libraries be concentrating on
providing reference services to their patrons. Librarian Ertell t`
advised Tigard purposely limited their video selections to avoid
'
ooaipeting with private video rental businesses. When other
libraries stock a large video collection, with a three-day check-
out time, the video circulation comprises up to 18 percent of total
circulation.
a
(Community Development Director arrived - 6:10 p.m.)
City Administrator, Librarian, and Councilor Eadon will be
attending the C IM meeting on Wednesday, November 8, to represent
Tigard's position.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MIIQ[IM - NOVEM13ER 6, 1989 - PAGE 1
t
b. Calendar Review: New dates to note for Council meetings are as
follows:
Special Council Meeting - November 16, 1989
5:30 - 7:00 Administrative Items (Space Needs)
7:00 Dartmouth LSD
Regular Council Meeting - December 4, 1989
6:30 - 7:30 Study Agenda
7:30 Business Meeting (Presently Scheduled:
Bull Mountain Annexation Public
Hearing)
Special Council Meeting - December 7, 1989
12:00 Noon LCRB - Award Bid - Bancroft Bonds
135th Avenue LID
Dinner Meeting - Date to be determined (12/6, 7, or 8) - with
Portland Councilman Earl Blumenauer regarding light rail
Council Workshop - To be scheduled in January
C. Discussion Items:
Tigard School District has requested City support of their position
with regard to class size being tied to "working conditions" as a
mandatory bargaining topic in union negotiations. This became an
issue as the result of a recent Employee Relations Board (ERB)
ruling. City Administrator will draft a resolution for Council
consideration to be forwarded to the league of Oregon Cities
calling for their support.
Whistle-Free Zone issue was discussed briefly. This agenda item
will be revisited if increased citizen interest becomes apparent.
Cable Television - Mayor suggested Council consider live television
coverage when major issues were scheduled.
Councilor Eadon advised she would be forwarding material to Council
concerning a request from the Metropolitan Area Communications
Commission (MACC) for a 10 percent increase in access funding.
Council will be asked to consider a resolution from MACC later this
month.
Hudson Property Development: Senior Planner Liden noted buffering
requirements included installation of a cyclone fence with slats
and evergreen plantings. Landscaping plans will be submitted to
fine-tune buffering layout. There was lengthy discussion with
Council expressing concerns over the buffering requirement; i.e.,
was this adequate? Community Develcpanent Director and Senior
Planner noted the final agreement was the result of meetings with
the developer and the neighbors. Mayor noted he had received
CITY C OMC M MEETING NIINUIES - NOVEMBER 6, 1989 - PAGE 2
t:
canm mication from several residents in the area advising they were
concerned about the type of buffering proposed.
After discussion, Council consensus was to review this issue as a
possible Coaamunity Development Code amexxbment. Cmmunity
Development Director advised such a change would take four to five
months to implement in order to work through reviews with staff,
NPO's, Planning C=maission and City Council. Council will note
this as discussion topic during their January work session.
Bull Mountain Transportation Study: Councilor Eadon noted that Bev
Fraude of the Bull Mountain CPO No. 4 has suggested the Bull
Mountain Transportation Study be delayed for public release until
January. This suggestion was made because of several issues being
worked through by residents on Bull Mountain. Lengthy Council f'
discussion followed. At issue with the delay was the concern that
development was occurring without the Transportation Plan in place.
t:*nnexation requests were periling; however, City Administrator
reminded Council that annexation and development were two separate
processes. Council consensus was to proceed with the
Transportation Study as planned.
3. WITH TUAIA r IN VAIr,FY ECONCHIC DEVECDPN NT ATICYJ:
(Workshop was postponed.)
4. VIS17MIS AGENDA. No visitors present.
b
5. CCNSENT AGENDA:
5.1 Approve Council Minutes: September 19, 25, 1989; October 9, 1989.
5.2 Receive and File: Council Calendar i.
5.3 Approve Wirral Order - Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 89-08 Zone
Change 89-08 Gross; NPO #7 - Resolution No. 89-86
5.4 Authorize Issuance of General Obligation Improvement Bonds-
Resolution No. 89-87
Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to approve the
Consent Agenda. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council
present.
4e
F
6. PUEUC WAKING - PLAN AFRIKKEI r CPA 89-07 ZCNE CHANGE 89-
07; 1*=GER-EM5/ROG%gUL NFO 15 A request for a Ccmprehensive Plan
Amendment from Colmwxcial Professional to Medium-High Density
Residential and a Zone Change from C-P (Ccmmercial Professional) to R-25
(Residential, 25 units/acre) for approximately 5 acres. 7JJC` ON: West
side of SW 72nd Avenue, between SW Varns Street and SW Fir Street (WCIM
2S1 1DB, Tax Lots 800 & 801, 2S1, 1DC, Tax Lot 3600).
o Public Hearing Continued to November 20, 1989 E
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 6, 1989 - PAGE 3
7. P[SGZC - CRDINIlAHM ANUUMV ZOA 89-03 CEN OF TIGARD
An amendment of chapter 18.90, Environmental Performance standards, to
adopt temporary Oregon Administrative Rules related to construction
activities within the Tualatin River basin. Oregon Environmental
Quality Cmm-ssion directives require the new rules to be in effect by
January 1, 1990. Location: City-wide.
a. Public hearing was opened.
b. There were no declarations or challenges.
C. Senior Planner Liden summarized this agenda item. in late July,
the State Environmental Quality Coumiission (EQC) adopted new
regulations pertaining to non-point source pollution caused by new
development. The new regulations apply to construction projects in
the Tualatin River Basin for which an application is submitted
after January 1, 1990. The City is required to adopt these
regulations. The Planning Commission considered these amendments
(ZOA 89-03) at their regular meeting on October 17, 1989.
The EQC is also considering potential rules which would put
additional requirements on new developanents, including a
requirement for permanent storm water treatment for some
developments.
d. Public Testimony: None.
e. Staff recommended Council adopt the proposed amendment as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
f. Public hearing was closed.
g. Consideration by Council:
ORDINANCE NO. 89-27 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND C.ZiAPI'ER 18.90,
&WIRONMERM PER EMANCE Sr'ANDARDS, OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY
DMUDPMENT CODE AND SEITING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (ZOA 89-03).
Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to adopt
Ordinance No. 89-27. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote
of Council present.
CITY OOWCIL MEETING ]MINUTES - NOVEMBER 6, 1989 - PAGE 4
8. PU$SC EgARIlG - pAC371C CORFICPATE CENT1R IDCAL DISTRICT
Consideration of an amendment to Ordinance No. 89-14 creating the
Pacific Corporate Center Local Improvement District. The purpose of the
proposed amendment is to correct the legal description of the District
boundaries as set forth in Exhibit "A" to said ordinance. More
particularly, the proposed amendment will reduce the width of the
norther 475 feet of the district immediately south of Bonita Road from
87.5 feet to 72.5 feet. This proposed correction of the legal
description will be the sole issue for consideration and action by the
council.
a. Public hearing was opened.
b. There were no declarations or challenges.
C. CcmTtunity Development Director summarized this agenda item. The
consultants on the Pacific Corporate Center Local Improvement
District (LID) project discovered an error in the legal description
of the boundaries of the LID. The legal description, as written,
includes a small amount of land outside of the intended LID
boundary. It was proposed to amend the boundary description to
reduce the width of the northerly 475 feet of the District
immediately south of Bonita Road from 87.5 to 72.5 feet. This
amendment will correct the description to conform with the right-
of-way which was actually acquired from John Smets. Legal Counsel
has reccamriended that this amendment be adopted in order to make it
clear that the Smets' property is not to be assessed under the LID.
d. Public Testimony - None. (Mrs. Mary Smets signed in as a
proponent; however, declined to testify when it was noted there
were no opponents to the proposal.)
e. Staff recommended adoption of the proposed ordinance.
f. Public hearing was closed.
g. Consideration by Council:
ORDINANCE NO. 89-28 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
PACIFIC CORPORATE CENTER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND DECLARING
AN EMEF43HNCY.
Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to adopt
Ordinance No. 89-28.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present.
9. NCR-AGENDA TTM: None
i
t
CITY CCUNCIL MEEIrrING NIINNUIIES - NOVEMBER 6, 1989 - PAGE 5
7 ,
I- 10. I=CUTM SESSION: Cancelled.
11. ADADI~d~]'P: 7:50 p.m.
Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder
ATT'EST:
City of Ti
Mytli es~d2tiY~
ccn1106
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 6, 1989 - PAGE 6
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7-6406
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising
City of Tigard RECEIVE Tearsheet Notice Tt►efolowu selecteil~gcftdaatemsaareEu`bwfryourfoauon
Fuither mfo m~ttoti and full agendas that' be obtau l,fib ft
P.O. Box 2 3 3 9 7 Duplicate Affidavit Recorder,13125 S W. Hall Bnulevatd Tigard,:Onegon97223, ant~► call; ~ .
Tigard, OR 97223 NOV o 6198V mg 6394171
CITY: COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 6,1989;
1131Y OF 7 5 GPM WORKSHOPy 6 30PM STUDY SESSION,..
7;30 PM BUSIIVESS`MEETING s
'I'IGARID CIVIC CErVrM TOWN-HALL`;.
13125 S W HALL BOULEVARD; JWARD, OREGON
• Council Workshop
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • StudySession =Discussion With Tualatin Valley Economic 7
STATE OF OREGON, ) Develiment Corporation A .
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' • Fttblzc Hwmgs s '
k ~ CbmprehensivePlan AmeWment CPA 89-07° Change 89-070
I, Alice Mni rden Metzger EMS Rockyvell NPO #5 (Cocauon WesrSide of W
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising 72nd Avh►tae, between S WrVaens StreetandS:Wt Fu:Stnaet)
Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tigard Times 'Zone,OXdmadceAniendmentZOA89=~3,CilyofTlgacd
3
a newspaper of general circulation a& defined in ORS 193.010 Atncndmeni'of Chapter 1890, EnvlrOnmental rforaiance
and 193.020; published at agar in the Stndat~Cls; relating to construct~ancvrl{es wthln the ' ~
aforesaid county and state; that the Tba3atuiRiyerbas~n >~a> z l
r i t y Coun c i 1 Meet i n g Niclf,.le' Corporate Center Loca1 Improvement Disirtot
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the Amendment;tgOnl~nance Not 8914 to correct legal
descnpuon _ h
entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and (ys Laca1 Contract RevrewsBoard - 1
Executive session under theprov~sionsof ORS'192660.(1)
consecutive in the following issues: t
(d), {e}; {h), &;(i} to discuss ]alior ielatrons, real ProPY`
w
JASM
November 2, 1989 transact~
lbhsi~
Subscribed and swor to before me this 3rd pf r, 1989
i
Notary Public for Oregon
My Commis ' xpire . 6/9/93
AFFIDAVIT
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7-6398
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 884.0380 Notice
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising
City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard , OR 9 7 2 2 3 13 Duplicate Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON,
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ass.
1, Muirden
being first my sworn, depose and say th t, I am t e Advertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of the ~igar~ Times
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at TI qa rd in the
Iresgid counly and state; that the
otice of Public Hearing
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
l October 26, 1989
Subscribed and swor to before me this 27th nf Onto her, 1989
Notary Public for Oregon
My Commissio Expires. 6/9/93
AFFIDAVIT
r
ryLLi1~ij"h RVIT
~ t
y'
~rta ~,.,ay3 lVCH4Y:Et .:•nb 't+'=rx;.,. cd7
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY E~E7_6403
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
r' 3 019x9
t Legal Notice Advertising
. OE
e City of Tigard • 13 Tearsheet Notice 'AD
P.O. Box 23397
• Tigard, OR 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON, )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss.
1, Alice Muirden
being first duly sworn, depose and saylb, %W.lthe Advertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of the
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at Tigard in the
afore it ccpunteyardnsstate; that the
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
October 26, 1989
r
Subscribed and swor to before e this 27th of October, 1989
Notary Public for Oregon
My Commissi Expire 7:6/9/9m3
AFFIDAVIT
tun W, 111i~fxW~o~vhtg~taill ~ ~ t~~~v~n NoXem
l k; Y9 0 gt-'f 3014A 'l grid v Gent@c, Town l# 1t+Room,131~5 r
SW$`dfnl~~r$r~,?5b►ead. QregonrFarth~er~a~~naY,bb
the 1,7evelopment or C~tylRecplet ffi the same+ ,
Ioc~osaor by CalUn 6394171 ` Yan are ~ti~retedt6 s~bartit4 'tvri~eii tes
titani tln; pubbc 6eainng;;w„attea snt~ ail testunor " will l
n
Y '
N
a _
r + Y
4 ~
d
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In the Matter of the Proposed
C[6 O/ t r
~jGv?~
Ord n a nce Nos. Vii- ar7 a net 8c a S
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss
City of Tigard )
I, V~ • 1 a~-~~$, being first duly sworn, on
oath, depo a^a say:
That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of
Ordinance Number(s) !Wq_Qr7 ar1C1 ~t-Ct-aS
which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated N oypno ber &I Ilia
copy(s) of said ordinance(s) bei hereto a tached and by reference made a
part hereof, on the q day of lmgtoN~ , 1984.
1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon.
' 2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon
3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
4. Albertson's Store, Corner of Pacific Hwy. (State Hwy. 99) and
S.W. Durham Road, Tigard, Oregon
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of /J7~P~cn 19j
Notar ublic for Oregon
My Commission Expires:
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO_ 89 ---Z-_L
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 18.90, ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, OF
THE rIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (ZOA 89-
03).
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its Community
Development Code periodically to improve the operation and implementation of
the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning staff made recommendation of findings to the City of
Tigard Planning Commission at their regular meeting on October 17, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on the proposed changes
at its regular meeting on November 6, 1989.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Chapter 18.90 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be amended as
shown in Exhibit "A". Language to be deleted is shown in
[BRACKETS]. Language to be added is UNDERLINED.
SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective on and after the 30th day
after its passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor and
posting by the Recorder.
PASSED: By L fMt n i rnouS vote of all council members present after being
read by number and title only, this( Y' day of
~w v F v, h CAL" , 1989.
father' Wheatley, De ty ity Recorder
APPROVED: This (G day of 989/ %
Gerald R. Edwar , ayor
ed as o form:
City Att rney
i
Date i
i
ORDINANCE NO. 89 - o~-
"EXHIBIT A"
Chapter 18.90
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Sections:
18.90.010 Purpose
18.90.020 General Provisions
18.90.030 Noise
18.90.040 Visible Emissions
18.90.050 Vibration
18.90.060 Odors
18.90.070 Glare and Heat
18.90.080 Insects and Rodents
18.90.010 Purpose
A. The purpose of this chapter is to apply the federal and state
environmental laws, rules, and regulations to development within the
City of Tigard. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52)
18.90.020 General Provisions
A. In addition to the regulations adopted in this chapter, each use,
activity, or operation within the City of Tigard shall comply with the
applicable state and federal standards pertaining to noise, odor, an
discharge of matter into the atmosphere, ground, sewer system, or
stream.
1. Regulations adopted by the State Environmental Quality Commission
pertaining to non point source pollution control and contained in
the Oregon Administrative Rules shall by this reference be made a
part of this chapter.
B. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Director may require
submission of evidence demonstrating compliance with state, federal,
and local environmental regulations and receipt of necessary permits.
Air Contaminant Discharge Permits (ACDP) or Indirect Source
Construction Permits (ISCP).
C. Compliance with state, federal, and local environmental regulations is
the continuing obligation of the property owner and operator. (Ord.
89-06; Ord. 84-24; Ord. 83-52)
18.90.030 Noise
A. The following additional restrictions are incorporated with the State
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) standards for purposes of
City noise regulation:
• f
f
I.
1. For purposes of measuring permitted sound levels from noise I
generating sources under the provisions of DEQ rules any point
where a noise sensitive building could be constructed under the
provisions of this title shall apply as if such point contained a
noise sensitive building;
2. Within the industrial park (I-P) zoning district, each property or
building under separate ownership from a noise generating source
shall be considered a noise sensitive property under the provision
of DEQ rules with the exception that the allowable noise levels may i
be increased by five db; and
3. The construction including excavation, demolition, alteration, or
repair of any building, except where a special permit has been
t
issued by the Director under the provisions of Section 18.90.020,
other than between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. which
involves any loud, disturbing, or unnecessary noise in the city, f
shall be deemed disorderly conduct and therefore unlawful. (Ord. i
89-06; Ord. 83-52)
S
18.90.040 Visible Emissions
A. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park zoning;
district, there shall be no use, operation, or activity which results
in a stack or other point source emission, other than an emission from
space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which r,
is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality
rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. (Ord.
89-06; Ord. 84-24; Ord. 83-52)
18.90.050 Vibration`
s.
A. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains, and
aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible i
without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. (Ord.
89-06; Ord. 83-52)
18.90.060 Odors
A. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to r
be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use
creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090)
apply. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 84-24; Ord. 83-52)
@@r
18.90.070 Glare and Heat k
z
A. No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high
temperature processes such as combustion or welding or otherwise, which
is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and:
1. There shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air
which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and f
C `
2. These regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in
parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction
or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. (Ord. 89-06;
Ord. 83-52)
18.90.080 Insects and Rodents
A. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be
maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of
insects or rodents or create a health hazard. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52)
cp/ZOA89-03
H:\LOGIN\DEBORAH\
C.
(22} - 25i Filed Secretary of State 7-28-89; EQC Meeting 7-21=89•1'
C Note: Bracketed [ ] material.is proposed to be deleted.
Underlines materials is proposed to be inserted.
DEFINITIONS
340-41-006
Definitions applicable to all basins unless context requires otherwise:
(1) "BOD" means 5-day 20° C. Biochemical Oxygen Demand.
(2) "DEQ" or "Department" means the Oregon State Department of
Environmental Quality.
(3) "DO" means dissolved oxygen.
(4) "EQC" means the. Oregon State Environmental Quality Commission.
(5) "Estuarine waters" means all mixed fresh and oceanic waters in
estuaries or bays from the point of oceanic water intrusion
inland to a line connecting the outermost points of the headlands
or protective jetties.
(6) "Industrial waste" means any liquid, gaseous, radioactive, or
solid waste substance or a combination thereof resulting from any
process of industry, manufacturing, trade, or business, or from
the development or recovery of any natural resources.
(7) "Marine waters" means all oceanic, offshore waters outside of
estuaries or bays and within the territorial limits of the State
of Oregon.
(8) "mg/1" means milligrams per liter.
(9) "Pollution" means such contamination or other alteration of the
physical, chemical, or biological properties of any waters of the
state, including change in temperature, taste, color, turbidity.,
silt, or odor of the waters,,or such radioactive or other
substance into any waters of the state which either by itself or
in connection with any other substance present, will or can
reasonably be expected to create a public nuisance or render such
waters harmful, detrimental, or injurious to public health,
safety,7or welfare,,or to domestic;. commercial, industrial,,
agricultural, recreational, or other legitimate beneficial uses
or to livestock, wildlife, fish or other aquatic life, or the
habitat thereof.
(10) "Public water" means the same as "waters of the state".
(11) "Sewage" means the water-carried human or animal waste from
residences, buildings, industrial establishments, or other places
-together with such groundwater infiltration and surface water as
340-41-006 - 1 -
PM\WH3582 j
may be present. The admixture with sewage as herein defined of
industrial wastes or wastes, as defined in sections (6) and (13)
of this rule, shall also be considered "sewage" within the
meaning of this division.
(12) "SS" means suspended solids.
(13) "Wastes" means sewage, industrial wastes, and all other liquid,
gaseous, solid, radioactive, or other substances which will. or
may cause pollution or tend to cause pollution of any water of
the state.
(14) "Waters of the state" include lakes, bays, ponds, impounding
reservoirs, springs, wells, rivers, streams, creeks, estuaries,
marshes, inlets, canals, the Pacific Ocean within the territorial
limits of the State of Oregon, and all other bodies of surface or
underground waters, natural or artificial, inland or coastal,
fresh or salt, public or private (except those private waters
which do not combine or effect a junction with natural surface or
underground waters), which are wholly or partially within or
bordering the state,or within its jurisdiction.
(15) "Low flow period" means the flows in a stream resulting from
primarily groundwater discharge or baseflows augmented from lakes
and storage projects during the driest period of the year. The
dry weather period varies across the state according to climate
and topography. Wherever the low flow period is indicated in the
Water Quality Management Plans, this period has been approximated
by the inclusive months. Where applicable in a waste discharge
permit, the low flow period may be further defined.
(16) "Secondary treatment" as-the following context may require for:
(a) "Sewage wastes" means the minimum level of treatment.
mandated by EPA regulations pursuant to Public Law 92-500.
(b) "Industrial and other waste sources" imply control
equivalent to best practicable treatment (BPT).,-
(17) "Nonpoint Sources" refers to diffuse or unconfined sources of
pollution where wastes can either enter into. or be conveyed by
the movement of water to public waters.
(18) Loading Capacity`(LC): The'greatest amount, of loading.. that a water
can receive'without'violating water;quality.. standards. „
(19) Load Allocation (LA): The portion of a•receiving-water's loading
capacity that is attributed either to one of its existing or
future non-point sources-of pollution or to natural background
sources. Load allocations are best estimates of the loading,
which may range from reasonably accurate estimates to gross
allotments, depending on the availability of data and appropriate
340-41-006 - 2
PM\WH3582
.t
r '
t
techniques for predicting loading. Wherever possible, natural and
nonpoint source loads should be distinguished.
(20) Wasteload Allocation (WLA): The portion of a receiving water's
loading capacity that is allocated to one of its existing or
future point sources of pollution. WLAs constitute a type of
water quality-based effluent limitation.
(21) Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL): The sum of the individual WLAs
for point sources and LAs for nonpoint sources and background. If
a receiving water has only one point source discharger, the TMDL
is the sum of that point source WLA plus the LAs for any nonpoint
sources of pollution and natural background sources, tributaries,
or adjacent segments. TMDLs can be expressed in terms of either
mass per time, toxicity, or other appropriate measure. If Best
Management Practices (BMPs) or other nonpoint source pollution
controls make more stringent load allocations practicable, then
wasteload allocations can be made less stringent. Thus, the TMDL
process provides for nonpoint source control tradeoffs.
'(22) "Land Development" refers'to any human induced change to•improved
or unimproved real estate. including but not limited to
construction, installation or expansion of a building, or other
structure, land division, drilling, and site alteration such as
that due to land surface mining dredging, grading, ading construction
of earthen berms. Raving.. improvements for use as parking or
storage. excavation or clearing,.
(23) "Jurisdiction" refers to any city or county agency in the Tualatin
River and Oswego Lake subbasins that regulates land development-
activities within its boundaries by approving plats site plans or
issuing Rermits•for land development
(24) "Erosion Control Plan" shall be -a plan containing a -list of best
management practices to be applied during construction to control
and limit soil erosion.
(25) "Public Works Project" means any land development conducted or
financed by a local, state, or federal governmental body,
340-41-006 _ 3 _
PM\WH3582
Note: Bracketed [ j material is proposed to be deleted.
Underlines materials is proposed to be inserted.
MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TREATMENT AND CONTROL OF WASTES
340-41-455
Subject to the implementation program set forth in rule 340-41-120, prior
to discharge of any wastes from any new or modified facility to any waters
of the Willamette River Basin, such wastes shall be treated and controlled
in facilities designed in accordance with the following minimum criteria f
(In designing treatment facilities, average conditions and a normal range
of variability are generally used in establishing design criteria. A E
facility once completed and placed in operation should operate at or near
the design limit most of the time, but may operate below the design
criteria limit at times due to variables which are unpredictable or
uncontrollable. This is particularly true for biological treatment
facilities. The actual operating limits are intended to be established by
permit pursuant to ORS 468.740 and recognize that the actual performance
level may at times be less than the design criteria.):
(1) Sewage wastes:
(a) Willamette River and tributaries except Tualatin River
Subbasin:
(A) During periods of low stream flows (approximately May 1
to October 31): Treatment resulting in monthly average
effluent concentrations not to exceed 10 mg/I of BOD
and 10 mg11 of SS or equivalent control.
(B) During the period of high stream flows (approximately
November 1 to April, 30): A minimum of'secondary
treatment- or equivalent control and. unless otherwise
specifically authorized by the Department, operation of
all waste treatment and control facilities at maximum
practical efficiency and effectiveness so as to
minimize waste discharges to public waters.
(b) Main stem Tualatin River from mouth to Gaston (river mile 0
to 65):
'(A) During,periods of low stream flows (approximately May I
to October. 31) Treatment" resulting in monthly average
effluent' concentrations not to exceed 10 mg/l of BOD. €
and 10 mg/l'of SS-or equivalent control.
(B) 'During the period of high stream flows (approximately 11
November 1 to April 30): Treatment resulting in
monthly average effluent concentrations not to exceed
20 mg/l of BOD and 20 mg/l of SS or equivalent control.
340-41-455
PM\WH3581
(c) Main stem Tualatin River above Gaston (river mile 65) and
all tributaries to the Tualatin River: Treatment resulting
in monthly average effluent concentrations not to exceed 5
mg/l of BOD and 5 mg/l of SS or equivalent control.
(d) Tualatin River Subbasin: The dissolved oxygen level in the
discharged effluents shall not be less than 6 mg/l.
(e) Main stem Columbia River:
(A) Dur`.ng summer (May 1 to October 31): Treatment
resulting in monthly average effluent concentrations
not to exceed 20 mg11 of BOD and 20 mg/1 of SS or
equivalent control.
(B) During winter (November 1 to April 30): A minimum of
secondary treatment or equivalent control and unless
otherwise specifically authorized by the Department,
operation of all waste treatment and control facilities
at maximum practicable efficiency and effectiveness so
as to minimize waste discharges to public waters.
(f) Effluent BOD concentrations in mg/1, divided by the dilution
factor (ratio of receiving stream flow to effluent flow)
shall not exceed one (1) unless otherwise specifically
approved by the Environmental Quality Commission.
(g) Sewage wastes shall be disinfected, after treatment,
equivalent to thorough mixing with sufficient chlorine to
.provide a residual of at least 1 part per million after 60
minutes of contact time unless otherwise specifically -
authorized by permit.
(h) Positive protection shall be provided to prevent bypassing
raw or inadequately treated sewage to public waters unless
otherwise approved by.the Department where elimination of
inflow and infiltration would be necessary but not presently
practicable.
(i) More stringent waste treatment and control requirements may
be imposed where special conditions may require.
(2) Industrial wastes:
(a) After maximum practicable.inplant._control, a minimum of
secondary treatment or,equivalent'control (reduction of
suspended solids and organic material where present in
significant quantities, effective disinfection where
bacterial organisms of public health significance are
present, and control of toxic or other deleterious
substances).
340-41-455 _ 2 _
PM\WH3581
(b) Specific industrial waste treatment requirements shall be
determined on an individual basis in accordance with the
provisions of this plan, applicable federal requirements,
and the following:
(A) the uses which are or may likely be made of the
receiving stream;
(B) The size and nature of flow of the receiving stream;
(C) The quantity and quality of wastes to be treated; and
(D) The presence or absence of other sources of pollution
on the same watershed.
(c) Where industrial, commercial, or agricultural effluents
contain significant quantities of potentially toxic
elements, treatment requirements shall be determined
utilizing appropriate bioassays.
(d) Industrial cooling waters containing significant heat loads
shall be subjected to offstream cooling or heat recovery
prior to discharge to public waters.
(e) Positive protection shall be provided to prevent bypassing
of raw or inadequately treated industrial wastes to any
C public waters.
(f) Facilities shall be provided to prevent and contain spills
of potentially toxic or hazardous materials and a positive
program for containment and cleanup of such spills should
they occur shall be developed and maintained.
Non-point source pollution control in the Tualatin River sub-basin
and lands draining to Oswego Lake to be provided after
January 1. 1989:
(a) The following` subsections shall apply. to any new land
development within the Tualatin River and Oswego Lake sub-
basins except those developments with application dates
prior to January 1 1990, The application date shall be the
date on which a complete application for development approval
is received by the local jurisdiction in accordance with the '
regulations of the local jurisdiction.
For land development no preliminary plat site plan permit
or public works project shall be approved by any jurisdiction
in these sub-basins unless the conditions of the plat permit
or plan approval includes an e'roslon control -plan containing
methods and/or interim facilities to be constructed or used
concurrently with land development and to be operated during
construction to control the discharge of sediment in the
stormwater runoff The erosion control plan shall utilize:
340-41-455 - 3 -
PM\WH3581
t
(A Protection techniques to control soil erosion and
sediment transport to less than one (1) ton per acre Per
year, as calculated using the Soil Conservation Service
Universal Soil Loss Equation or other equivalent
methods. See Figures 1 to 6 in APPENDIX I for
examples. The erosion control plan shall include
temPOrary sedimentation basins when. because of steep
slopes or other site specific considerations, other on-
site sediment control methods will not likely keep the
sediment transport to less than one (1) ton per acre per
year. The local jurisdictions may establish additional
reouirements for meeting an equivalent degree of
control. Any sediment basins constructed shall be sized
using 1.5 feet minimum sediment storage depth plus 2.0
feet storage depth above fora settlement zone. The
storage capacity of the basin'shall be sized to store
all of the sediment that is likely to be transported and
collected during construction while the erosion
potential exists. When the erosionRotential has been
removed, the sediment basin, or other sediment control
facilities. can be removed and the site restored as per
the final site plan. All sediment basins shall be
constructed with an emergency overflow to prevent
erosion or failure of the containment dike. or
A soil erosion control matrix derived from and
_ consistent with the universal soil loss equation
approved by the jurisdiction or the Department.
(c) The Director may modify Apgendix I as necessary without
approval from the Environmental•Ouality Commission. THe
Director may modify Appendix Ito simplify it and to make it
easier for people to apply.
,(d) As local jurisdictions adopt a -Department approved program
plan, as required by OAR 340-41-470(3) W. these-requirements
will no longer apply to development in that jurisdiction.
340-41-455 - 4 -
PM\WH3 5 81
APPENDIX I
CONTENTS
Table 1 Universal Soil Loss Equation
Table 2 "R" Values, Washington County
Table 3 Hydrologic Soil Group of the Soils
Table 4 LS Values
Table 5 "C" Values Mulch Factors
Table 6 "C" Values
Figure 1 Interceptor Swale
Figure 2 Temporary Interceptor Dikes
Figure 3 Level Spreader
Figure 4 Sediment Trap
Figure 5 Pipe Slope Drains
Figure 6 Stabilized Construction Entrance
4
WC5169 A-3
a .
TABLE I UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION
o Comoutind the sediment storage volume - The sediment storage volume required is the vciume
required to contain the annual sediment yield to the trap and can be estimated by using the
Universal Soil Loss Equation (LISLE) developed by the United States Oepartment of Agricuiture.
A - R-K-t.S-CV-PR
Where A = annual sediment yield in tons per acre
R rainfall erosion index;
K soil erodibiliity, factor. from Table 3 or as determined
by field and laboratory testing by a geologist. sod
scientist. or geotecnnical engineer.
• LS length-slope factor. from Table 4 (note. lengths
measured are horizontal distance from a plan view)
Cl s cover factor. use t.0 which represents no ground cover
during the construction process. TABLE S and 6
-PR erosion control practice factor, use 0.9 which represents
trackwaiking up and down slope. (Dozer deaf marks
parallel to contours)
C Annual sediment yield calculation. step-by-step procedure:
a. Compute the R value by obtaining the R value from the 2-year/6 -hour Isopluvial Map
in TABLE 2
b. Divide the site into areas of homogeneous SCS. soil type and of uniform slope and
length.
C. Note the K value from the SCS soils chart (Table . 3 for each soil type.
d. Determine the LS value for each uniform area (See Table 4
e. Compute the annual sediment yield (A) in tons per acre for aach-homogeneoust uniform
area by multiplying R times the •K and LS values for each area
f. Multiply the annual sediment yield (A) for each area by the acreage to be exposed (only
that area to be cleared) of each area Sum the results to compute the total annual
sediment load (in tons) to the trap (L,J.
o The sediment storage volume (V,) is then determined by dividing the total annual sediment load
(in tons) (L,) by an average density for.the sediment deposited use O.Os ton per cubic foot
V. ' L./Pavs•
Mimi
112 CLATUP
COUNTY ~7~rO• .=a ! 1 ✓tJ T,D ,S'0~ ,f C J '
4 ~j r rY t• Y
£ r a••f hi
~1 72 I,fr ( Jet w.o I I 1~ I `WASHINGTON COUNTY N
s L
~ 1 S~
1 I \ .1+ I LOCATION ASAP
i
`7 O 1
o ` ~S~' 1 S 1 I ~~Z D
z
raft
CUYIfw ~ NOo+o , 1 • t ..i• ~ a O
r j t r % r a.. 2
Y I'' '.1 1, I''! Ayy
-t ' \L Llrf NJI 1 1 /
10
Joe
CN(
Y A 14 N 1 L L ti, I~ I! i
WASHINGTON COUNTY
m OREGON o k T w '•r/. '
o ;u
r
N 0 JANUARY 1973
tCALt 1.100,000 A
off
J• I C L A C K A M M
U
V
TABLE 3 HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS WASHINGTON COUNTY
Soil Soil
Hydro- Erod- Hydro- Erod-
Map logic ibility Map logic ibility
Soil Grouo Symbol Group Factor, Soil Grouo Symbol Groua Factor, "K"
ALOHA 1 C 0.43 HUBERLY 22 U 0.37
AM I T Y 2 C 0.32 JURY 'L3 C O.2
ASTORIA 3 B U.24 KILCHIS 24 C 0.15
BRIEUWELL 4 B 0.28 KLICKITAT 24G 8 0.1
BRIEDWELL 5 B 0.17 KNAPPA 26 8 U.37
CARLTON ti d U.32 LABISH 27 U 0.2
CASCADE 7 C 0.37 LAUREL'14000 28 8 0.-3
CHEHALEty 8 C 0.37 MCBEE 30 B 0.28
CHEHALIS 9 U 0.24 MEL80URNE 31 B 0.24
CHEHALIS Ili B 0.37 1.1ELBY 32 C 0.32
CORNELIUS 11 C U.37 uLYIC 34 B 0.32
KINTON 11ii C. U.43 PERVINA 36 C 0.24
CORNELIUS UUATAHA 37 C 0.37
VARIA14T 12 C 0.37 SAUM 38 C 0.32
COVE 13 U 0.28 TOLKE J9 8 0.28
COVE 14 U 0.17 UUIFLUVENTS 40 a 0.17
0-4YTOW 15 U 0.43 VERBUORT 42 U U.28
ENA 16 U 0.43 WAPATO 43• U 0.32
GUBLE 17 C 0.37 WILLAMETTE 44 8 0.32
GOBLE 18. C 0.37 WOOUBUM 45 C 0.32
HELVETIA 19 C 0.37 XEROCHREPTS 46 B 0.43
HEMBRE 20 8 0.32 HAPLOX'EROLLS tit= C 0.32
HILLSBORO 21 d 0.49 XERUCHRtPTS 47 U O.U2
RUCK OUTCROP 470 NA 0.02
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP C'.ASSIFiCAT1ONS
A. (Low nrnott potential). Salt having high infiltration rates. even when thoroughly wetted. and consisting
craeliy at deep, wed-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These sails have a nigh rate of water
transmisslom
e. (Moderately tow runott potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted. and
consisting eniefly at moderately fine to moderately coarse texttues. These saris nave a moderate rate of
water transmission.
C. (Moderately high ninon potential). Soils having slow Infiltration rates wnen thorougmy wetted. arts
consisting chiefly of sods with a layer that Impedes CoWnward movement of water. or sods win moderately
fins to line textures These sods nave a slow rate of water transmission.
0. (High runotf potential). Sails having very slow -intdtmiton rates when inerougruy wetted and consisting
cruelly of clay sods with a nigh sweating potential. sails win a permanent Mk3n water table, sods wttn a
hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow adds over nearly tmoarvtdus material. These sods `T
have a very stow rata of water transmission.
From SCS
A-6
TABLE Ls VALUES FOR "R" ZONE 2 - ORECOA s
,
MLRA's Al, A2, :.3, A5, 36, 024, D25, and E43
For slopes 92 or flatter
LS 4 cos(tan"ls))m(65.41 sin2(tan-ls) + 4.56 sin(tan"ls) + 0.065)
72.6
For slopes steeper than 97.'
LS - cos(tan-ls))0.50(_[sin(tan"ls))1.4
72.6 sin 5.143
Wheres
4.- length in feet along slope
s - slope in 7./100
For s < 0.01, m=0.20
0.01 < s < 0.035, m=0.3
0.035 < s < 0.045, m=0.4
s = 0.045, m=0.5
Percent
Slope 25 50 75 100 125 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
0.1 0.06 0.065 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.085 0.09 0.09 0.095 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.1
0.2 0.06 0.07 0.075 0.08 0.085 0.09 0.095 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.105 0.11 0..
0.5 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.:
1.0 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.20 0-
2.0 0.13 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.26 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.32 0.---
3.0 0.19 0.23 0.26 0.28 0.31 0.32 0.35 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.43 0.45 0.-
4.0 0.23 0.30 0.36 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.53 0.58 0.62 0.65 0.70 0.73 0.7
i
5.0 0.27 0.38 0.46 0.53 0.60 0.65 0.76 0.85 0.93 1.00 1.07 1.13 1.2
6.0 0.34 0.47 0.58 0.67 0.75 0.82 0.95 1.06 1.16 i.26 1.34 1.42 1.5~ f
7.0 0.41 0.58 0.71 0.82 0.92 1.01 1.16 1.30 1.43 1.54 1.65 1.75 1.3 f
8.0 0.47 0.70 0.86 0.99 1.11 1.21 1.40 1.56 1.71 1.85 1.98 2.10 - 2.2
9:0- -0-59-- 0.83 ..1.01. .1_17 ...-L.31 1.43 .--1.66---.--L-85- 2_03...- ..2.19_ 2.34. _.-.2.48 276.
10.0 0.68 0.96 1.17 1.35 1.51 1.66 1.92 2.14 2.35 2.53 2.71 2.87 3.•0:.
j
12.0 0.87 1.23 1.51 1.74 1.95 2.13 2.46 2.75 3.02 3.26 3.48 3.69 3.E
14.0 1.08 1.52 1.86 2.15 2.40 2.63 3.04 3.40 3.73 4.02 4.30 4.56 4.8
16.0 1.29 1.82 2.23 2.58 2.88 3.16 3.65 4.08 4.47 4.82 5.16 5.47 5.
18.0 1.51 2.14 2.62 3.02 3.38 3.70 4.27 4.78 5.23 5.65- ( 6.04 6.41 6.
20.0 1.74 2.46 3.01 3.48 3.89 4.26 4.92 5.50 6.02 6.51 J 6.96 '7.38 7.
i
22.0 1.97 2.79 3.42 3.94 4.41 4.83 5.58 6.24 6.83 r 7.38 7.89 8.37 8..
24.0 2.21 3.12 3.83 4.42 4.94 5.41 6.25 6.99 7.65 , 8.26 8.84 9.37 9._
26.0 2.45 3.46 4.24 4.90 5.48 6.00 6.93 7.74 8.48 9.16 9.80 10.40 11.+
28.0 2.69 3.81 4.66 5.38 6.02 6.59 7.61 8.51 9.32 110.10 10.80 11.40 12.
30.0 2.93 4.15 5.08 5.87 6.56 7.19, 8.30 9.28 10.20 [ 11.00 .11.70 12.40 13. k
32.0 3.18 4.49 5.50 6.35 7.10 7.78 8.99 10.00 111.000 11.90 12.70 13.50 14.
34.0 3.42 4.84 5.92 6.84 7.65 .8. 3i 9.67 ,.10.80 11..80 12.80 13.70 14.50 15., x
36.0 3.66 5.18 6.34 7.32 8.18 8.97 .10.40 - 11.60 112.70 13.70 14.60 15.50 16.3
38.0 3.90 5.52 6.75 7.80 8.72 9.55 11.00 12.30 13.50 14.60 15.60 16.50 17.; t
40.0 4.14 5.85 7.16 8.27 9.25 10.10 11.70 13.10 ! 14.30 15.50 16.50 17.50 18.
45.0 4.71 6.67 8.17 9.43 10.50 11.50' 13.30 x14.90 16.30 17.60 18.90 20.00 21.;
50.0 5.27 7.45 9.12 10.50 11.80 12.90 14.90 116.70 18.20 19.70 21.10 22.30 23.•; F
55.0 5.79 8.18 10.00 11.60 12.90 14.20 16.40 18.30 20.00 21.70 23.10 24.60 25. [
60.0 6.27 8.87 10.90 12.50 14.00 15.40 17.70 ( 19.80 21.70 23.50 25.10 26.60 28.•
Vertical lines indicate normal limits of simple slopes.
s
t
i
• EE
f
Revised February 1986
SLOPE LENGTH IN FMff
500 550 600 700 800 1000 1200 1300 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600
.3.10 0.105 0.11 0.11 0.115 0.12 0.12 0.125 0.13 0.13 J 0.135 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.145
3.11 0.11 0.115 0.12 0.125 0.13 0.13 0.13 00135 j 074 0.14 0.145 0.15 0.15 0.15
-3.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.16 _ 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.175 0.18 0.18 0.185
3.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.26 x0.27 0.28 0.28 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.34
3.33 0.33 0.34 ,_¢.36 0.371 040 0.42 0.40 0.44 0.46 0.48 0.49 0.51 0.52 0.53
0.46 0.48 0.49 J- 0.51 0.54 0.57 0.60 0.62 0.63 0.66 0.68 0.70 0.72 0.74 0.76
0.76 0.79 0.82 0.87 0.92 1.00 1.08 1.12 1.15 1.21 1.27 1.32 1.38 1.42 1.47
1.2.1.25 J 1.31 1.41 1.51 1.69 1.85 1.93 2.00 2.14 2.27 2.39 2.51 2.62 2.73
I.5H 1.57 1.65 1.78 1.90 2.12 2.33 2.42 2.51 2.69 2.85 3.00 3.15 3.29 3-1•2
1.84 I 1.93 2.02 2.18 2.33 2.60 2.65 2.97 3.08 3.29 3.49 3.68 3.86 4.03 )
?.21J 2.32 2.42 2.62 2.80 3.13 3.43 3.57 3.70 3.96 4.20 4.43 4.64 4.85 5.05
2.62 - 2175 2.87-.-.-3.10 3.31- 3.70 4.06 4.22 4.38 4.68 4.97 5.23 5.49 5.73 5.97
3.03 3.18 3.32 1 58 3.83 4:28 4.69 4.89 5.07 5.42 5.75 6.06' 6.36 -6.64 6.9-1-
3.89 4.08 4.27 4.61 4.93 5.51 6.03 6.28 6.52 6.97 7.39 7.79 8.27 8.53 8.88
=.81 5.04 5.27 5.69 6.08 6 80 7.45 7.75 8.05 8.60 9.12 9.62 10.09 10.54 10.97
`..77 6.05 6.32 6.82 7.19 8.15 8.93 9.30 9.65 10.31 10.94 11.53 12.09 12.63 13.15,
6.76 7.09 7.40 7.99 8.55 0.56 10.50 10.89 11.31 12.09 12.82 13.51 14.17 14.80 15.41
7.78 8.16 8.52 9.20 9.84 11.00 12.00 12.54 13.01 13.91 14.75 15.55 16.31 17.04 17.73
8.a2 9.25 9.64 10.40 11.20 t2.50 13.70 14.22 14.76 15.77 16.73• 17.64 18.50 19.32 20.11
9.88 10.40 10.80 11.70 12.50 14.00 15.30 15.93 16.53 17.67 18.74 19.76 20.72 21.64 22.53
11.00 11.50 12.00 13.00 13.90 15.50 17.00 17.66 18.33 19.59 20.78 21.90 22.97 23.99 24.97
12.00 12.60 13.20 14.20 15.20 17.00 18.60 19.40 20.14 21.53 22.83 24.07 25.24 26.36 27.44
.3.10 13.80 14.40 15.50 16.60 18.60 20.30 21.15 21.95 23.47 24.89 26.24 27.52 28.74 29.92
&.20 14.90 15.60 16.80 18.00 20.10 22.00 22.90 23.77 25.41 26.96 28.41
.5.30 16.00 16.80 18.10, 19.30 21.60 23.70 24.66 25.59' 27.35 29.01 30.58
_6.40 17.20 17.90 19.40 20.10 . 23.20 25.40 26.40 27.39 29.28 31.06 32.74
.7.40 18.30 19.10 20.60 22.10 24.70 27.00 28.12 29:80 31.20 .33.09 34.88
18.50 19.40 20.30 21.90 23.40 26.20 '28.70 29.83 30.95 33:09 :35.10 37.00
21.10 22.10 23.10 24.90 26.70 29.80 32.70 33.99 35.28 37.71
:3.60 24.70 25.80 27.90 29.80 33.30 36.50 37.97 39.41 42.13
25.90 27.10 28.40 30.60 32.70 36.60 48.10 41.73 43.31 46.30
:8.10 29.40 30.70 33.20 35.50 39.70 43.50 45.24 46.95 54.19
LS values right of the vertical lines will normally
be used in calculating complex slopes.
15
i
TABLE 5 C' VALUES MULCH FACTORS
Type of Mulch Land Factor Length
mulch Rare Slooe C limit=
Tans per acre Percent Feet
None 0 all 1.0 -
' Straw or hay, 1.0 1-5 0.20 200
tied down by 1.0 6.10 .20 100
anchoring and
tacking 1.S 1.5 .12 300
equipment' 1.5 6-10 .12 150
.06 A00
Da. 2.0 1-5
2.0 6-10 .06 200
2.0 11-15 .07 1S0
2.0 16-20 .11 100
2.0 21-25 .td 75
2.0 26-33• .17 50 I
'i 2.0 34-50 .20 35 I
Crushed stone, 135 16 .05 200
!1 to 1 !n in 135 16-20 .05 ISO
135 21-33 .05 100 r
+ 135 34-50 .05 75
Oo. 240 <21 .02 300
240 21-33 .02 200
2a0 34-50 .02 ISO
Wood chips 7 C 16 OS 75
7 16-20 .08 50
Do. 12 <16 OS 150
12 16-20 .05 100
12 21-33 .05 75
00. 25 <16 .02 200
25 16-20 .02 150
25 21.33 .02 100
25 34-50 .02 75
' From Meyer and Ports (2.1). Developed ,by an interagency work-
shop group an the basis of field experience and limited research
data.
Maximum slope length for which the specified mulch rate is
considered effective. When this limit is exceeded, either a higher.
application rate or mechanical shortening of the effective slope t
length is required.
' When the straw or hay, mulch is not anchored to the soil. C
values on moderate or steep slopes of soils. having K values areater ;
than 0.30 should be taken or doublf- the values given in this table.
A-8
E
i
op FACTORS (OREGON)
C s
T A6L~ CONSTRUCT 104 szTE
1.00 <
. D
r
m
. 8fl
.75 LA
,70
C 85
,80 - o
F `
A .55
C • 50
T AS
0 .~0
R .36
S 30
25
.2® LOOSE SOILS SOIL
UNDISTURBED
J e
0 100
' OS 50 80 70 80 9
q0
10 2® 30
RESIDUE COVER
R vEbETATION AND
uTNTE
PERCENT
.D
r''rtY~•3'f'AY e
a
FIGURE t INTERCEPTOR SWALE
I it min.
Level Bottom t
t rt min. r _
Gros or Rock ••77-.,yv 1
ROW or Ott+
I 100'. zoo'. or 200'
12 n mut.y So~t9 ~ I -
deoendtng on S100e
80ROm Width 2 tees minimum: the bosom width small be level
Depth t toot minimum
side Slope 2H: IV or flatter
maximums percent. with positive drainage to a suitable outlet
Grape
(such as sedimentation pond)
Stabilization Seed as per Grassed C-hannd or.
pock: t2 incites intck, pressed into banx and extending at lest 8
inches vertical from the bottom.
F
` RE '72 r .TF~tPOR."jZyij IMWOR"jZyij-,4TERCE?TOR DIKE 77
I Qthe rnwernl rx7m0 =Od I -
to 95% Pic= ,
:8' mWt: +~~Jr • . t' t ~•~j ( S ~i I t ,,i j
' ^s-~;,: ~ •,..,.,~p.. I ~ TZ, ir.~ :.Y ~J.~~ ~iE'~ l i »%«..~.+`u ~w.wo~-~ t:s. F-~.'.. i .w r. % ~ e. z~ -
+ Y.S. a •l.;.
~ntrrcaotar dtGt sOacu+9
I 300' dePena'ng 0n grace
A-1Q
Now=
s
vEL SPgEa.DER
FIGURi 3 0-'
r1
trttercePtor Sean
- efltor
of tntefc .
natto excel°`° Gcace
-
-41
v'r~ r
j
slate
C;tannet Grade Stabilized
l
Gave! 8erm Spreader
rued Outlet
' Undistu
ttattef
~~Il''tll f' ~Ih I n
77
~ kl
rn A ~rrrr ~ .
o t,,.
O - ~r 1, r'' ~u~ f y. ~ ~
rl ll'I~(( ~(r 1';
41
C: I
r FIGURE 5 PIPE SLOPE ORA NS
Oiscnarge into a stabilized - Earth Oike
watercourse or a sediment /
trapping device or onto a ljf
stabiiized area / ' fat
T
r - Corrugated meta!
orAOS pipe
-fit
a
Slope-2:1 Ha0+1'2-
t` elbows 60 30 I
Slope 3 o or ( i
steeper
Corrugated 6- min j
metal
orAOSp p Standared flared Cutoff Wait ! t
• i e entrance section
~
Oiameter 0 (for pipe 2:12
!!Il . I h~' Riarap ~3etrfest~3t
Oeptn of apron shad be
equal to pipe aiameter
s• min. at less r'
than i % slope
re
-"r,.
'a
A-13
5
FIGUr o STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION E:VTRaNC£ '
-Os
R z ZS Mljv
12, MIX ~
,r .8' pVARRY SPACES
1
-14
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 89- Q 8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATE
CENTER LOCAL DISTRICT AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Tfn P Rove mt NT
The City Council Finds:
1. On May 22, 1989, the City Council enacted ordinance
No. 89-14 creating the Pacific Corporate Center Local
Improvement District.
2. Section 1 of said Ordinance incorporates an attached legal
description identified as Exhibit A and setting forth the
boundaries of the District.
3. Subsequent to the enactment of said Ordinance, it has come
to the Council's attention that the legal description
attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 89-14 erroneously
describes the width of the northerly 475 feet of the
District as 87.5 feet.
C 4. It was the intent of the Council at the time of enactment
of Ordinance 89-14 that said width of this portion of the
District boundary be 72.5 feet.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Ordinance No. 89-14 creating the Pacific Corporate
Center Local Improvement District is amended to
substitute a revised Exhibit A setting forth the
correct legal description of the District
boundaries. The revised legal description is set
forth in Exhibit A hereto.
SECTION 2: The substitution of the revised legal description
is deemed to be corrective in nature and
consistent with the Council's findings and intent
in adopting Ordinance 89-14, as set forth therein.
SECTION 3: Inasmuch as it is necessary that the correction
be accomplished with the least possible delay in
order to complete authorized local improvements
during the current construction season, an
emergency is hereby declared to exist and this
ORDINANCE NO. 89- a g
Page 1
Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
passage and approval by the Council.
PASSED: By L) r lCt in •11-y) c, u S vote of the Council members
present after being read by number and title only,
thisday of A,1L)yq-i~yiAk-t 1989.
herine Wheatley, corder
APPROVED: This day /UU✓E.w 1989.
Gerald Ed arils, Mayor
Approved as to form:
City Attor y
IL
Date
ORDINANCE NO. 89-
Page 2
EXHIBIT A
REVISED NOVEMBER 1989 PAC013
4-18-89
D.W.B.
Page 1 of 3
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED LID BOUNDARY
A tract of land in the east one-half of Section 12, Township 2
South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard,
Washington County, Oregon, said tract being more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 5, of BONITA GARDENS, as
recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 11, Washington County Plat
Records; thence Northerly along the west line of that parcel
described in a conveyance to John and Marietta Smets in Book
1016, Page 414, Washington County Book of Records, to the
southerly boundary of that parcel described as Parcel 4 in final
judgement of the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the
County of Washington, Case No. 33547, recorded in Book 1017, Page
124, Washington County Deed Records; thence Northerly, tracing
the westerly boundary of said Parcel 4, to the south right-of-
way of S.W. Bonita Road, being the southeast corner of that
parcel dedicated to the public as Parcel 3 in Document No. 83-
41862, Washington County Book of Records; thence Westerly,
tracing the south right-of-way of S.W. Bonita Road to the east
right-of-way of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence Southerly, tracing the
east right-of-way of S.W. 72nd Avenue to a point which is 300.00
feet southerly of, when measured at right angles to, the
centerline of S.W. Bonita Road; thence westerly, parallel to the
centerline of S.W. Bonita Road to the west right-of-way line of
S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence Northerly, tracing the west right-of-
way of S.W. 72nd Avenue, to the south right-of-way of S.W. Bonita
Road; thence Westerly, tracing the south right-of-way of S.W.
Bonita Road to a point which lies 300.00 feet westerly from, when
measured at right angles to, the centerline of S.W. 72nd Avenue;
thence Northerly, parallel to the centerline of S.W. 72nd Avenue,
to the north right-of-way of S.W. Bonita Road; thence Easterly,
tracing the north right-of-way of S.W. Bonita Road to the west
right-of-way of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence Northerly, tracing the
west right-of-way of S.W. 72nd Avenue to a point which lies
300.00 feet northerly from, when measured at right angles to, the
centerline of S.W. Bonita Road; thence Easterly, parallel with
the centerline of S.W. Bonita Road, to the east right-of-way line
of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence Southerly, tracing the east right-
of-way of S.W. 72nd Avenue to the north right-of-way of S.W.
Bonita Road; thence Easterly, tracing the north right-of-way of
S.W. Bonita Road to a point which lies opposite centerline
DmTD:~tiS\'D?►1X)CIaIES. L\C.
EXGI.\EM. SCRCEI'ORS. PLINNER%. LkND>CAPE .ARCHITECT.'
OFFICL~ I\ OREGON. USHNGTOX a\D C.kUFOR\LA
_'828 SA\ CORBETT .A\ E\l'E
PORTLA.\D.OREC'rt)X 9-201-4h it)
SEP 7 1989
N•j..
PAC013
4-18-89
D.W.B.
Page 2 of 3
Station 14+27.30 per stationing as shown on County Survey number
20,596; thence Southerly, parallel to the west line of said
parcel described in Book 1016, page 414 to the southerly boundary
of said Parcel 4 described in said Book 1017, page 124; thence
Westerly tracing the southerly boundary of said Parcel 4, to a
point which lies 72.50 feet easterly of, when measured at right
angles to, the west line of said parcel described in Book 1016,
page 414; thence Southerly parallel with the west line of said
parcel described in Book 1016, page 414, to the north line of Lot
5, BONITA GARDENS; thence Easterly tracing the north line of said
- - Lot 5, across a vacated alley and continuing along the north line
of Lot 2 of said BONITA GARDENS, to the westerly right-of-way
line of the R.H. Baldock Freeway (also known as Interstate No.
5) ; thence Southerly, tracing the westerly right-of-way of the
R.H. Baldock Freeway to a point opposite Centerline Station 11UB3"
148+00 (S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road) per stationing shown on
State Highway Drawing No. 1A-8-6; thence Southeasterly in a
straight line, passing through said centerline Station 11UB34-
148+00 to the northeasterly extension of the southeasterly right-
of-way of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road; thence Southwesterly,
tracing the northeasterly extension of the southeasterly right-
of-way of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road and then along the
southeasterly right-of-way of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road to the
east line of that parcel described as "Parcel A: PTR # 171, 172
and 173" in a conveyance to Pacific Realty Associates LP. in
Document No 84-8324 Washington County Book of records, thence
Southerly, tracing the east line of said "Parcel A: PTR # 171,
172 and 173" described in said Document No. 84-8324, to a point
which lies 100.00 feet southeasterly of, when measured at right
angles to, said State Highway Centerline 11UB3" (S.W. Upper Boones
Ferry Road) ; thence Southwesterly, parallel with said State
Highway centerline 11UB3" to the northeasterly right-of-way of the
Southern Pacific Railroad; thence Northwesterly, tracing the
northeasterly right-of-way of the Southern Pacific Railroad to
the southeasterly right-of-way of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road;
thence Southwesterly tracing the southeasterly right-of-way of
S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road to the southwesterly right-of-way
line of the Southern Pacific Railroad; thence Southeasterly
tracing the southwesterly line of the Southern Pacific Railroad
to a point which lies 100.00 feet southeasterly of, when measured
at right angles to, said State Highway Centerline "UB3", thence
Southwesterly, parallel with said State Highway Centerline "UB3"
to a point which lies opposite Centerline Station 11UB311 159+00•
thence Northwesterly to a point opposite Centerline Station 11UB3'.
159+00 on the northwesterly right-of-way line of S.W. Upper
C
D.k\11) E\:~\5.1\D ASSOMTES. NC
EXGI\EER,~. S!.'RVE.YORS. MANNERS. UNDSCAPE ARCHITEC5
PAC013
4-18-89
` D.W.B.
Page 3 of 3
Boones Ferry Road; thence Northeasterly, tracing the
northwesterly right-of-way of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road to the I
southwesterly right-of-way of the Southern Pacific Railroad;'
thence Southeasterly tracing the southwesterly right-of-way of
the Southern Pacific Railroad to the northwesterly right-of-way
line of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road; thence Northeasterly`
tracing the northwesterly right-of-way of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry }
Road to the northeasterly right-of-way of the Southern Pacific
Railroad; thence Northwesterly, tracing the northeasterly right- y
of-way of the Southern Pacific Railroad to the west right-of-way
line of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence Northerly tracing the west
right-of-way of S.W. 72nd Avenue to a point opposite centerline
Station 59+11.10 per stationing as shown on County Survey Number
20,596; thence Easterly to a point on the east right-of-way of
S.W. 72nd Avenue which is opposite said Centerline Station
59+11.10; thence Southerly, tracing the east right-of-way of S.W.
72nd Avenue to a point on the northerly line of that parcel
conveyed to Pacific Realty Associates, L.P. in Document No. 89-
3125, Washington County Book of Records; thence Easterly, tracing
the boundary of said parcel described in Document No. 89-3125, to
a point in the westerly line of said Lot 5, BONITA GARDENS;
thence Northerly, tracing the westerly line of said Lot 5, to the
point of beginning.
k
f
F
I
rp~
7
i'
I'
D.JMD EV.V,N5 kND A.tiSOCLATU. LNC.
ENGINEERS. SCRVRORS. PLANNERS. Lk_XD.,CAPE ARCHITECTM.
" AGENDA 'tTEM'- If 2' VISITOR'.:;:S: AGENO'A; : DAT 1 ;L6/ 9....
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) "
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council
wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you
first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City
Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED
P/Pctse.09jn-
DATE 11/6/89
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print the information)
PERSONS WILL BE ALLOWED 10 MINUTES E'OR PRESENTATIONS.
Item Description: Agenda Item.No. 4 - Public
Hearing - Comprehensive Plan Amendment -..CPA.89=07;
;;Zone Change 89-07; Metzger-EMS/Rockwell NPO #5
Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue)
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
Ago ~n
}
DATE 11/6/89
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print the information)
PERSONS WILL BE ALLOWED 10 MINUTES FOR PRESENTATIONS.
Item Description: ,Agenda.Item No. 5 - Public `
Hearing - Zone Ordinance Amendment ZOA 89-03;
City of .Tigard,,,;.
t
Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue)
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation f'
i
i.
F
S
C
4
DATE 11/6/89
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print the information)
PERSONS WILL BE ALLOWED 10 MINUTES FOR PRESENTATIONS.
Item Description: t.,Agenda Item No- -6 _ Public'Hearing
Pacific..Corporate Center-Local, 1*t6vement` District
Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue)
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
moles-
Jo/epas'e
,?mil
i
` fi{(VL~ ~~PSsi crvt
10
Comparison of levy taxes collected and WCCLS reimbursement
by participating jurisdiction.
For both models:
fixed levy amount
central computer recapitalized
circulation projected for each library
assessed valuation projected, countywide, at 3.8% growth per year
assessed valuation shifted from unincorporated area to cities at 1.5% per year
figures for average year of new levy are shown
Model 1B2
Levy amount: $5,351,752
estimated tax collections: $5,212,606
countywide programs: $893,721
program enhancements: $419,741
computer recapitalization: $200,000 kc{C
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
CO, % of WCCLS Payment Reimbursement Net
C ~(L kA county levy taxes for from WCCLS (d-(b-c))
AV collected countywide for non-
Jurisdiction (1989) in juris- services fee access
diction
Beaverton 18.92% $986,367 $286,388 $1,395,878 $695,899
Cornelius 1.121 $58,551 $17,000 $64,427 $22,876
Forest Grove 2.86% $149,088 $43,287 $212,923 $107,122
Hillsboro 10.84% $565,123 $164,082 $371,954 ($29,088)
Sherwood 0.79% $41,046 $11,918 $34,406 $5,278
Tigard 13.10% $682,739- $198,231 $459,426 ($25,082)
Tualatin 4.75% $247,721 $71,925 $279,093 $103,297
Wilsonville 0.68% $35,353 $10,265 $20,000 ($5,089)
Unincorporated
(community libraries) 46.94% $2,446,619 $710,367 $913,053 ($823,199)
Total 100.00% $5,212,606 $1,513,462 $3,751,160
Model 282
Levy amount: $6,015,000
estimated tax collections: $5,858,610 3
countywide programs: $893,721 j
program enhancements: $419,741
computer recapitalization: $200,000
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
d % of WCCLS Payment Reimbursement Net
SSpg~ ~~v` county levy taxes for from WCCLS (d- (b-c) )
uU AV collected countywide for non-
Jurisdiction (1989) in juris- services fee access
diction
Beaverton 18.92$ $1,108,609 $286,388 $1,585,569 $763,349
Cornelius 1.12% $65,807 $17,000 $45,101 ($3,706)
Forest Grove 2.86% $167,564 $43,287 $203,803 $79,526
Hillsboro 10.84% $635,159 $164,082 $615,444 $144,366
Sherwood 0.79% $46,133 $11,918 $25,098 ($9,117)
Tigard 13.10% $767,352' $198,231 $660,182 $91,061
Tualatin 4.75% $278,421 $71,925 $291,289 $84,793
Wilsonville 0.68% $39,735 $10,265 $29,541 $71
Unincorporated
(community libraries) 46.94% $2,749,831 $710,367 $939,981 ($1,099,482)
f Total 100.00% $5,858,610 $1,513,462 $4,396,008
t
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
1 TlWa MMUMS - SFPMMM 18, 1989
1. RCg,L CML: Present: Council President Valerie Johnson; Councilors
Carolyn Eadon, Joe Kasten (arrived at 7:10 p.m.), and Jahn Schwartz.
Staff Present: Patrick Reilly, City Administrator and Catherine
Wheatley, City Recorder.
2. W - STALE 1F1 SENT&TIVE TM BBZM
a. Representative Brian reviewed highlights of the last State
Legislative Session:
o Transportation Funding - Council received a summary of bills
entitled "Oregon's Lwidmark Transportation Funding Package."
Council and Representative Brian reviewed the various
transportation measures approved by the 1989 Legislature.
o There will be funds available (Oregon Access Fund) for the Six
Corners Project in Sherwood regardless of whether MSfIP/2 was
approved by the voters on September 19.
o He has discussed with Mayor Cole (Beaverton) the possibility
of utilizing funds now earmarked for Farmington Road for
completion of Scholls Ferry Road improvements. However, this
must be formally reviewed by the Beaverton City Council. In
addition, State matching funds would be available to
element local dollars.
o He outlined potential resources for other projects such as the
Marine Fund for waterfront improvements in Cook Park (i.e.,
docks, retaining walls for boats, and boat ramps).
He noted redesignated tax funds were earmarked for
improvements to small airports (i.e., Mollalla, Aurora, etc.).
o Representative Brian reviewed crime issues and noted an
aggressive approach to drug issues. Civil forfeiture laws
were expanded so all jurisdictions could participate under
state guidelines.
o He reported the "Portland Drug House" law was utilized to
model the state statutes. Oregon Administrative Rules
(OAR's) were being developed.
o schools were now authorized to hire their awn security
r personnel.
o Land Use (mobile homes) - legislation stipulates that mobile
homes cannot be treated differently than stick-built homes in
single-family zoning areas. criteria has been established for
size, appearance, and valuation.
o Utility Franchise Fees (HB 3000): Representative Brian
reported on the effort on the part of utilities to exclude
competitive services and prodacts from franchise fees.
Cities, however, would be allowed to increase their tax rates
to seven percent of the base. Amounts over three percent
would be shown as a separate line item, noting it was a city
tax, on the customer's bill.
o Systems Development Charges (SDC) (HB 3224): Provides
specific guidelines for utilization of SDC funds collected.
o Metropolitan Service District (METRO): New payroll tax would
be levied on public agencies (excluding schools) which
includes cities, counties and special districts.
(Councilor Kasten arrived at 7:10 p.m.)
Excise fee shall be levied and secured by METRO formulated on
six percent of gross income from. all METRO services. The
bill was defeated once; however, it was passed when brought up
a second time.
o Haz-Mt & Fire Training - Representative Brian reported on the
positive outlook for development of a state-wide hazardous-
material training center in the City of Beaverton. There was
a great need for this with local jurisdictions, state
agencies, and private c=onies expressing an interest in
joining resources.
o Representative Brian advised it has been proposed that the
Oregon Driver's License should be revised; it has proven to be
inadequate for identification purposes.
There was discussion on a revocable driver's license for
teenage drivers.
Council and Representative Brian discussed the 4th of July
celebration. Last summer's event was very successful. Councilor
Johnson asked for a report to City Council prior to the upcoming
budget cycle.
3. NCR-AGENDA 17EM:
a. Dale Tuma 11000 S.W. Walnut, Tigard, Oregon 97223, advised he was
present to note concerns with regard to a parking ticket received
by his daughter for parking too close to a mail box. He said he
thought a_warning would have been preferable to a ticket since the
area was not posted and this was not a law found in the driver's
manual. Discussion followed.
f
t
4
f
E
Cm-Icilor Johnson noted this provision was a City of Tigard
Ordinance which was why the law was not found in the state driver's
manual. She outlined the history behind the passage of the
Ordinance noting this has been a problem, especially in the
neighborhood adjacent to the high school. The post office would
not deliver mail if the carrier could not drive up to the mail box.
Mr. Tuma suggested Council consider posting signs.
4. COURM Inj3cFI'S (iEVA'lE CN BOAEW & lES<S)
a. Councilor Eadon reported:
Parks Board - Future activity to be determined by outcome of
9/19/89 election.
Library Board - WC= election issue in March; this will become
more of an issue as election draws closer. Library has implemented
a new program to circulate best sellers more quickly. Three copies
of a best seller are purchased; two are routed through general
circulation with the third copy placed in a rental program.
Experimentation in other libraries bas shown this to be an
effective way to keep popular books circulating among patrons. The `
cost to rent a book was 10 cents per day; it was egDec-ted that this
program would pay for itself and allow for purchase of more books
in the future.
b. Councilor Schwartz reported:
Transportation Committee - Transportation Safety Bond construction
projects were underway.'
Surface Water Management - Regional agency was formed through
approval by the Boundary Commission. Formulation of fees was first
work issue on agenda. There was some discussion on whether was a
need for continuance of the Steering committee; this will be
discussed further. Consensus appeared to be Steering Committee
should be kept intact to provide vehicle for communities to express
opinions on prioritization of projects.
c
C. Councilor Kasten reported: a
Washington County Transportation - future direction is dependant
upon the outcome of the MSTIP/2 funding issue on the 9/19/89
ballot.
d. Councilor Johnson reported:
Economic Development committee - this committee shall be meeting to t
follow up on several issues including devising an "exit interview"
for businesses leaving the area and review of the Ambassador
Program.
Political Action C7ceranittee - has been formed and has filed the
necessary docLments to work on the City Center election issue to
appear on the November 7, 1989 ballot.
5. E EMME SESSMM: Cancelled.
6. ADJOUENMERI!: 8:15 p.m.
u G1> c~..~ .
Chuth,e
Catherine Meatley, City Recorder
ATrE9r:
Mayc&, City of Tigard
r
cc:nrecords\ccm918
( TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MFI<LM M]NUTES - SEPMMM 25, 1989 - 6:30 P.M.
1. M-T CALL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon
(arrived at 7:00 p.m.), Valerie Johnson, and John Schwartz. City Staff
Present: Wayne Iawry, Finance Director (present for study session
only) ; Ed Murphy, Coamunity Develop wrrt Director; Liz Newton, Senior
Planner; Tim Ramis, City Attorney; Catherine Nheatley, City Recorder;
and Randy Wooley, City Engineer (arrived at 7:10 p.m.).
2. STUDY SESSIC K:
a. Park Board present: Chairman Steve Slabaugh; Board A'1mnbers Jeff
Hepler, Bud Hillman, and Sheldon Scolar.
Council and the Park Board reviewed the election results of the
September 19, 1989 Special Election.
Discussion followed on the future prioritization of the projects
for the Park Board. With regard to the favorable outocxne of the
election, it was noted that staff would prioritize and set a
schedule for implementation and funding of projects. Chace
coapleted, this work would be submitted to the Park Board for
their analysis and input before it was submitted to the Council
their review and implementation. Financing of projects was
discussed. It was noted that assessments would not be received by
the City until November of 1990. In order to begin projects before
then, the City would have to borrow funds in advance.
Other topics of discussion included the following:
o Land Acquisition.
Chairman Slabaugh noted that people were concerned that
dollars were not being set aside for new parks (i.e., Bull
Mountain area). He said that the City needed to identify
areas in need and possible ways of raising dollars for land
acquisition. Several ideas were discussed for funding which
included:
- increasing Systems Development Charges
- explore grant opportunities
- potential land donations
- another levy proposal to voters for land acquisition
- require land dedications from developers
Councilor Johnson said potential maw costs for newly
acquired parks must be reviewed in detail.
CI`T'Y COUNCIL MRUrES - SEPTEMBER 25, 1989 - PAGE 1
s
~r
``fFtF'
1
r
o Recreation Program.
Chairman Slabaugh noted that the Park Board may want to
activate a recreation program. Discussion followed.
Councilor Eadon noted the Library had implemented a "seed
recreation program which was being monitored to determine
levels of usage and success. Council may want to fund
additional money next budget year; however, she did not feel
the program would be increased extensively for at least
another one or two years.
A regionalized recreation-program approach was discussed. f
This may include working with Tualatin for jointly sponsored ~
recreational activities.
Board member Hepler advised he felt there was a need for adult f
recreation in Tigard and said that the city should at least
begin studying the issue. Councilor Johnson noted she had `
not received a great deal of cca[ment from Tigard citizens
about recreation concerns.
Councilor Eadon pointed out that there was a shortage of
facilities for recreational use. There was discussion on the
fact that school facilities were used extensively for adult
recreation.
Service district formation was discussed as a possibility for
recreational programs. Cost concerns were noted.
(Randy Wooley arrived at 7:12 p.m.)
Chairman Slabaugh noted that all programs and issues would be
continuously reviewed to assure that the City was ready with a
new plan when the park levy expires in five years. He advised
that the Park Board would also continue to oversee the capital
improvement projects identified in the regular City budget.
o Alternative Funding
Councilor Eadon advised that the Council had met with
Representative Teen Brian earlier this month. Representative
Brian advised that marine funds were available for waterfront
development of boat ramps, retaining walls, and moorage
improvements. Staff was working on submitting a request for
funds to be used for Cook Park improvements along the
Tualatin River.
City Council thanked the Park Board for their attendance and
congratulated them on the successful election.
CITY COUNCIL MUM - SMUMER 25, 1989 - PAGE 2
b. City center discussion:
in response to a question from councilor Johnson on the content of
the wording of the proposed ballot measure, City attorney advised
that portions of the development plan could be implemented through
alternative funding (other than tax increment financing) should the
ballot measure fail.
council consensus was to hold Town Hall meetings for the City
center development plan on October 10 and 11, at Twality and Fowler
Junior High.
C. Durham Road construction:
councilor Johnson asked about duct problems as a result of
construction on Durham Road. City Engineer advised he had visited
with city inspectors this morning; the contractor was to be
informed that dust control measures were to be implemented.
3. AGENDA REVIM:
a. 3.1, Authorize Interfund Loans Resolution. Mayor Edwards noted a
correction to the resolution in the wording in the title and in
sections 1A and 1B of the Resolution: Where it reads "Local
Improvement District C.IP," the wording should be changed to read
Local Improvement District Debt Service Fund."
b. Mayor Edwards noted that representatives from NPO #3 may be
present during the Visitor's Agenda to request a fee waiver for an
appeal of the Director's Decision on the Hudson property.
4. VISITORS AGENDA:
o Herman Porter, Chain for NPO #3, 11875 SW Gaarde, Tigard, OR
97224, requested a waiver of fee for the NPO's appeal of the
development conditions on the Hudson property. (Appeal of
Director's decision SDR 89-20 and V 89-26). (See Tigard Municipal
Code, Section 18.23.345).
Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to waive
the appeal fee as requested by NPO #3.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present.
o John Moore, Vice President, WIM Development, 15800 SW Boones Ferry
Road, Suite CI301, lake Owego, OR 97035, advised that he was the
developer of the property which was the subject of the appeal noted
above.
C
CITY COUNCIL KDXM 8 - SEPI'FMER 25, 1989 - PAGE 3
Mr. Moore expressed concern that the appeal be limited to those
points which were brought out by the NPO in their formal appeal. !
He advised that his ccupany would work hard to ccu a to an t.
understanding with the neighborhood to address the appeal issues.
5. f P AG MIU
5.1 Authorize Interfuxl Loans - Resolution No. 89-74..
5.2 Authorize Appointment of City Recorder - Resolution No. 89-75.
5.3 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board (LCRB)
Meeting: Award Bid for 104th Hillview Storm Drain; Adjourn LCRB;
Reconvene Council meeting.
Motion by councilor Johnson, seconded by councilor Eadon, to approve
the Consent Agenda.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present.
P
Recess Council Meeting
Local Contract Review Board members present: Present were President
Jerry Edwards; Board members Carolyn Eadon, Valerie Johnson, and John
Schwartz.
Motion by Board member Johnson, seconded by Board member Schwartz, to
approve Consent Agenda Item .3 as submitted.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of the LCRB present.
Reconvene Council Meeting
6. Qd OF CTrY (ENnR 'IAN BALTOT Tl'iIE:
a. RESOLUTION NO. 89-76. A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
CALLING FOR A SPECIAL ET'TON TO SUBMIT TO THE PMISTEPM,
QUALIFIED VM!MS OF THE CITY THE CITY CENTER DEVELO MENT PLAN AND
THE AUTHORITY To USE TAX INCRHIMU FINANCING AS A METHOD OF FUNDING
ACTIVITIES SET FORIH IN THE PLAN.
Councilor Johnson briefly reviewed the process to date. She noted
the November 7 election was the culmination of three years of
review and work by the City council and many citizens for the
revitalization of downtown.
Mayor Edwards advised that several more educational sessions would
be held. Upcoming events included two Town Hall meetings, an
educational workshop, and a pancake breakfast.
Motion by councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to adopt
Resolution No. 89-76.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPITMER 25, 1989 - PAGE 4
7. NCH-AGENDA ITENS:
Park levy - Councilor Eadon noted that the Park levy passed at the
September 19, 1989, Special Election. She advised that the Park Board
was very encouraged by the support shown in the ccrmmnity. Staff, the
Board, and City Council would begin prioritizing the implementation
schedule for the funded projects.
7. EVE SESSMM - Candled.
8. AMOURMENT: 7:51 p.m.
Approved by the Tigard City Council on /VU VQ P" kr , 1989.
City Recorder - City of Tigard
ATl'EST:
"Mayo"r, City of Tigard
cp/CWCM925
H:\WORD\CI'YREC\
CITY COUNCIL, MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 25, 1989 - PAGE 5
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MMIM M NU MS - OC EIER 9, 1989 - 6:30 PM
1. RQti. CALL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon
(arrived at 7:20 p.m.), Valerie Johnson (arrived at 6:42 p.m.), Joe
Kasten, and John Schwartz. City Staff Present: Patrick Reilly, City
Administrator; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Ed Murphy, Ccammuiity
Development Director; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; Liz Newton,
Senior Planner; John Acker, Assistant Planner; and Ron Goodpaster, Chief
of Police.
2. STEW SESSICH:
a. Workshop meeting with the Economic Development Committee -
Present for the Economic Development Committee: William A.
Monahan - Chairperson; members Amo De Bermrdis, Brian Moore, Paul
Etchemendy, and ex-officio member Peggy Weston Byrd.
Chairman Monahan reviewed the Ambassador Program. He advised that
he felt the Ambassador Program was a good one; however, there had
not been a lot of interest on the part of business in the area for
this. He noted that there was a lot of material available and that
the Ambassadors are ready in case there is a call for information.
He advised that the committee may need to do more outreach
activities in order to let organizations know that the Ambassador
Program is available. He advised that the Economic Development
Committee has been looking at another phase of the Ambassador
Program, and that would be to solicit information from people who
are moving out of the comimnity. He advised that this has been
started by the preparation of a questionnaire which asks for
comments from these businesses who are leaving. He noted that the
Economic Development Committee was interested in helping with the
downtown redevelopment, triangle developanent, and periodic review.
He asked how they could help the City Council.
Ms. Weston Byrd advised that she was continuously handing out a lot
of the material which was prepared by City staff to business people
interested in the Tigard area. This material included population
information, maps, Economic Development Cotrnnittee contacts, lists
outlining members of City Council, etc.
(Councilor Johnson arrived at 6:42 p.m.)
Mayor Edwards noted that he liked the activities where businesses
are asked how things are going. He advised that he thought it was
a good idea that the Economic Development Committee solicit input
information from those businesses who were leaving the area.
There was discussion on businesses in the City of Tigard and their
perception of City staff and whether or not the staff was helpful
and knowledgeable. Mayor outlined that it appeared that for the
most part the perceptions were good.
CMNICM M AMM - OCTOBER 9, 1989 - PAGE 1
Councilor Schwartz suggested that the Ambassador Program might be
of help by asking businesses, after they have been in business for
a few months, to look back at the process and report on how happy
they were with their experience.
amwilor iduison noted that there are post cards available for
members of the Eoonmuc Development Cmtmiittee to use when they make
contact. After obtaining the name and address of the business, the
post card should be mailed to John Acker at the City Hall. In this
way, John Acker can get a message to these businesses on the
services available. There was discussion on grand openings of
busirzsses so that they could participate and welcome new
businesses. There was discussion on further materials which could
be available to help publicize the Ambassador Program. This
included brochures left with real estate firms and visits to
various service organizations. Mr. De Bernardis noted that visual
guides were needed to show what was happenu g in Tigard. He noted
that there was no display on the vision for the City Center. He
noted that the lobby would be a fit area to place different
displays so people could visually see what was happening within the
city. There were co m mts that items such as aerial photos, pin
maps showing building activities, and different photographs of
happenings within the City would be a good thing to have-
(City Engineer Wooley arrived at 7:00 p.m.)
Economic Development Ccetmiittee asked for the Council consensus if
they would put together a format for decorating the foyer. After
some discussion, it was Council consensus for the Economic
Development Coimuttee to work on this idea. Discussion followed on
some of the activities which were Doing for the City Center
Development education/information process.
Peggy Weston Byrd cmmiented on an upomning meeting with a
representative from Les Aueoin's office to discuss the need for a
full-service post office.
b. Study Session Items:
o It was noted that there was a Tigard School District joint
meeting with City Council on October 16.
o City A&unlstrator noted that the Washington County Elections
Division requested a ballot box for the September election be
placed in City Hall. After discussion, Council consensus was
not in favor of a ballot box in City Hall, since the City had
an issue on the ballot. It was suggested that the Fire Hall
be used as it had been in the past.
C MIML III UrLES - OCiCBM 9, 1989 - PAGE 2
o City Engineer reviewed a petition from Bull Mountain residents
concerning the Three Mountain residential subdivision. The
residents were concerned that a center turn lane from Bull Mountain
Road into the entrance of the Three Mountain residential
subdivision and a school bus fit, as part of the modifications
now being made to Bull Mountain-Road be implemented. City Engineer
described the problem noting that one property owner was losing
some property to right-of-way because of road alignment. City
Engineer advised the county bad reviewed the plans and the left
turn lane and the bus pull out were not required.
(Councilor Eadon arrived at 7:20 p.m.)
Discussion followed. City Engineer noted that staff did not feel
there was a strong need for the turn lane, and therefore, did not
reo~¢aervded it. However, the residents in the area wanted these
additional conditions of development. Councilor Johnson noted Bull
mountain jurisdiction issues deserved more discussion time at a
future meeting.
City Engineer noted it was within the Plannuig commission's
authority to make a ration for the turn lane and bus
turnout. However, due to some misinformation, this was not
coordinated effectively with the Cainty.
Mayor Ddwards noted reservations about using large amounts of City
staff time on issues outside City limits.
Councilor Jau-Lson stressed that the Bull Mountain Transportation
Study mast be completed as soon as possible. The situation could
be reviewed again from an urban-services delivery point of view.
There was further discussion on the issue. Council consensus was
that the transportation issues for the Bull Mountain area should be
discussed more fully and should be scheduled on a future agenda.
(Business meeting was called to order at 7:42 p.m.)
3. VISEMIS AGEMA: No visitors.
4. PROC AZTICN: DTSABn' IY EMPIDYM P Aim MNTR - OCIOHM 1989
a. Proclamation was read by Mayor Fdwards. (A copy of said
proclamation has been filed with the packet meeting material.)
00=aL MnRYXES - OCMIM 9, 1989 - PAGE 3
5. C CN9 NP AGENDIL
5.1 Approve Council Minutes: August 21, and September 11, 1989
5.2 Receive and File: a. Council Calendar
b. Certified 9/19/89 Election Results
5.3 Notify State of Oregon of City of Tigard's Position on Video Poker
Gambling - Resolution No. 89-77
5.4 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Focal Contract Review Board (LcRB)
Meeting: a) Award Bid for Janitorial Services; b) Award Bid for
Crack Sealer. Adjourn LCVB; reconvene council Meeting.
5.5 Approve Criteria for Evaluation of City Administrator
5.6 Call for Public Hearing and Receive Engineer's Report - 135th IM-
Resolution No. 89-78.
Motion by Councilor Johnson; seconded by Councilor Kasten, to approve
the Consent Agenda.
'The motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
6. "FUNRULTUN OF RHOORDS RETENTION 9CHWUE - cmi NO. 89-25 AN
C EDIlNANCE 194ENDIM CF20 FR 2.48 OF TW TIGARD MlMICIPAL CODE PEEU%311 G
TO TM (I' MC U N, IC K, AND DF~IIaD=CK OF CITY RHOORD.S, AND
FIXIWAN FFFE TIM DATE.
Motion by Councilor Johnson; seconded by Councilor Kasten to approve the
ordinance.
Zhe motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present.
7. NW-AGENDA r12M:
a. Ed Murphy distributed a survey concerning planning and development
issues. In anticipation of the upcoming October 23rd Work
Session, he requested that Council complete the survey to help
determine which topics were of most concern. He requested the
surveys be returned by Monday, October 16.
8. ElCEC13TIVE SESSICK: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session
at 7:50 p.m., under the provision of ORS 192.660(l) (d), (e), (h) & (i)
to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and
pending litigation issues, and City Administrator evaluation.
C
C OUNC7L MH UM - OIZECE t 9, 1989 - PACE 4
9. . 9:20 v.m.
APPMVED by the Tigard City Council on A/0 VF1z1A t , 1989.
ra--t k OJ 4z
City Recorder - City of Tifard
ATl'ESr:
'Mayor - City of Tigard _
ke/CDWC1009
H: \WORD\CI)aRBC
Recording Secretary: Ellen Fox
0OUNC 1L PEfflums - OCMEKEt 9, 1989 - PACE 5
3, a
M
{
HENDRANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, 0RBGON
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council _For By
FROM: Patrick J. Reilly, City Administrator _For Your Information
DATE: October 30, 1989 -Sign and Return
SUBJECT: COUNCIL CUMMAR, Nov. 189 - Jan 190 j
F
Official Council meetings are marked with an asterisk If generally OK, we
can proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars.
November '89
*6, Mon Council Business Agenda (5:30/7:30) (TVEDC Workshop)
7, Tues Election Day
10, Fri Veterans' Day Observed (City Hall Closed)
11-13, Sat-ion League of Oregon Cities Conference - Eugene
15, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 a.m.)
*20, Mon Council Business Agenda (5:30/7:30) (Senator Paul Phillips)
23-24, Ihurs-Fri Thanksgiving Holiday (City Hall Closed)
25-29, Sat-Weds NLC Conference - Atlanta, Georgia
December 189
1, Fri Annual Tree Lighting Event
*4, Mon Council Study Agenda (5:30)
7, Thurs Special Council Meeting (LCRB) - (12:00 Noon) (Award Bid- i
Sale of Bonds for 135th LID)
*11, Mon Council Business Agenda (5:30/7:30) (Library Board
Workshop)
*18, Mon Council Business Agenda (5:30/7:30) (TRFPD Workshop)
20, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 a.m.)
25, Mon Christmas Holiday (City Hall Closed)
January 190
1 Mon New Year's Day (City Hall Closed)
? Council Workshop
*8, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)
*15, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)
17, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 a.m.)
*22, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)
23, Tues Joint Meeting with Washington County Board of commissioners
cw/cccal
Council Calendar - Page 1
f
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: November 6, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: October 25, 1989
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Comprehensive PREVIOUS ACTION:Planninq Commission
Plan Amendment CPA 89-08 ZC hearino on 10/3/89;Council hearing on
October 23, 1989
89-08 (GrosAhv- PREPARED BY: Deborah Stuart
DEPT HEAD O CITY ADMIN O [Viff REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
Should the City change the Comprehensive Plan to allow neighborhood commercial f
development at the southwest corner of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 135th;
Avenue?
INFORMATION SUMMARY i
On Tuesday, October 3, 1989, the Tigard Planning Commission heard a request for
a comprehensive plan amendment and zone change for a 1.87 acre
parcel located
at the northern end of SW 135th Avenue abutting SW Scholls Ferry Road on the IL
west side of SW 135th Avenue. The commission recommended that this proposal be
denied based on the comments of the State Highway Division, Washington County, j
NPO #7 and the City of Beaverton which raised concerns pertaining to traffic
and access to the property. At its regular meeting on October 23, 1989, the
City Council voted to uphold the Planning Commission's recommendation for
denial and ordered the staff to prepare a resolution. Attached are a resolution
denying the application, exhibit "A" (staff report) and exhibit "B" (map).
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
4P
1. Adopt the attached resolution. [
2. Modify and approve the attached resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
SUGGESTED ACTION
i
Adopt the attached resolution.
CITY OF TIGARD, ORD(30N
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM! SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: November 6. 1989 DATE SUE IITIED: October 30, 1989
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Issuance of PREVIOUS ACTION: ORD 89-26 Final
General Obligation Improvement Bcril6j Assessment
PREPARED BY: Wayne Lowry. Fin. Dir.
DEPT HEAD O ADMM OKI AM REQUESTED BY: Same
POLICY ISSUE
Before Bancroft General Obligation Bonds can be issued for the 135th Avenue
Local Government District, the City Council must authorize the issuance.
INFt~RMATION SUMMARY
The final assessment for the 135th Avenue LID was levied by ORD 89-26 dated
October 23, 1989. Assessment notices have been sent to all participating
property owners giving them the opportunity to pav their assessment in cash or
to pay it in installments over a ten year period. For those electing to pay in
installments, the City must issue Bancroft General Obligation Improvemmt Bonds
in the total amount of the installment contracts. In addition, installment
contracts for the 68th Parkway Final Assessment, and the Hall/Burnham LID are
also included in this bond sale.
Because we will not know the total amount to be bonded until November 16, 1989,
the attached resolution allows for the Finance Director to set the exact amount
of bonds to be sold but in no case will the city issue more than $720,000.
These bonds will be structured with early call dates to allow the flexibility
to deal with early payoffs in order to avoid uneven matching of cash flows.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Authorize issuance of bonds.
FISCAL IlMPACr
1. Increases general obligation debt with an offsetting increase in revenue
from the levy of special assessments to be paid in installments with
interest.
SUGGESTED
ACTION
1. Staff reconmiends approval of resolution to authorize issuance of General
Obligation Bonds.
Attachment
cp/WL8926
N:\WORD\
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council November 2, 1989
FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder
SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 5 - Amendment to Exhibit B of Proposed Ordinance
Attached please find an amended Exhibit B to the proposed ordinance for Agenda
Item No. 5 pertaining to EQC rules for storm water. This information was
received from the EQC after your packets were prepared. Please discard the
Exhibit B which was sent to you earlier.
Thanks.
cw
i
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council October 30, 1989
FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder
SUBJECT: CPA 89-07/ZC 88-07 (Metzger-EMS/Rockwell)
The above-referenced agenda item was set over from the October 23, 1989, City
Council meeting. Please retrieve the material you received for that meeting
(Agenda Item No. 6) which will be considered at the November 6, 1989 meeting
as Agenda Item No. 4.
cw
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON I
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: DATE SUBMITTED: October 11, 1989
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 89-07/ PREVIOUS ACTION: Reviewed by Planning
ZC 88-07 Met er-Ems Rockwell Commission on October 3 1989
PREPARED BY: Jerr Offer Planner
DEPT HEAD O CITY ADMIN OK i' REQUESTED BY: Ed Murphy, CD Director
POLICY ISSUE
Should the City redesignate approximately 5.02 acres from a Comprehensive Plan
designation of Commercial Professional and a zoning designation of C-P
(Professional/Administrative Office Commercial) to a Plan designation of Medium
High Density Residential and a zoning designation of R-25 (Multiple-Family
Residential, 25 Units Per Acre)? The applicants urge the City to approve the
proposal in order to provide for multi-family opportunities within close
proximity to the Triangle area and major traffic corridors. Opponents view the
proposal as providing the potential for greater impacts upon the established
Rolling Hills neighborhood which abuts the site.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On October 3, 1989, the Planning Commission reviewed the above described Plan
Amendment/Zone Change proposal. The subject site is located at 13265 SW 72nd
Avenue, south of Varns Street. The site is currently developed with one single
family residence. The site abuts the developed, single-family residential
Rolling Hills subdivision on the north, west, and south sides.
The Planning Division staff report re,;_.c:-.ds approval of the proposal based
upon findings that the proposal is condi.tent with applicable Statewide
Planning Goals, Plan policies, the Plan's loc;.`.ional criteria for the Medium-
High Density Residential Plan designation, ant a finding that a mistake had
been made in original Plan designations. Staff noted that the Plan's
locational criteria and policies call for multi-family housing opportunities to
be provided near employment and commercial centers and near primary traffic
corridors and transit routes. Staff noted, however, that multi-family housing
opportunities provided by the existing Plan and zoning maps, (especially with
regard to developable properties) are extremely limited near the Triangle,
Lincoln Center/Washington Square, SW 72nd industrial corridor, downtown, and
near I-5 and Highway 217. Staff's recommendation for approval of this proposal
noted that approval would be a step towards correcting this mistake with
resultant benefits for the entire community by making a traffic sensitive
locational decision. The applicants concurred with the staff analysis and
s
added testimony regarding the site's poor suitability for typical C-P uses as
well as a change of circumstances regarding changed markets for office and
multi-family development. The applicants added testimony regarding how
apartment development on the site could be sensitive to the needs of the `
adjacent single family neighborhood.
Public testimony at the Planning Commission hearing was mixed. Proponents
cited reasons why the property was unsuited for typical C-P uses and that the
proposal was an opportunity for quality development of the site. Opponents
noted potential conflicts with the adjacent neighborhood including increased
traffic, noise, crime and fireplace smoke as well as potential decreased
property values and the need for the City to assure the neighbors' expectations
for the property.
The Planning Commission voted 5 to 1 to recommend denial. Commissioners noted
that the proposal would likely result in a quality development for the site,
but the Commission was not convinced that a change in circumstances affecting
the parcel or a mistake in Plan designations had been demonstrated.
Commissioners noted that this was a difficult recommendation to make because
they found that the site satisfied the applicable locational criteria and the
site is well located with respect to proximity to employment/commercial centers
and transportation corridors. However, the general sentiment of the Commission
was that there is an obligation for the City to assure the neighbors'
expectations for the future development of property through denial of the
proposed amendments.
Attached is a vicinity map; the Planning Division staff report; the October 3,
1989 Planning Commission minutes regarding the proposal; the applicants'
proposal description booklet; and written comments on the proposal received by
the Planning Commission.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve as recommended by staff.
2. Deny as recommended by the Planning Commission.
FISCAL IMPACT
SUGGESTED ACTION
Approve the proposed Plan/zoning map amendments. Adopt the staff report as
findings supporting the approval and supplement these findings as necessary.
Direct the staff to prepare a final order.
br/CPACC.jo
C.
• • • LIMB
j • • • • • • • • ` fw
• . • •
i.., • •
j \ • • • . • • • I • • •
• • • • • • • • • •
i • • • • •
} A. • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • .O•
fr • • _ • • • • • • • • • •
•n• CT w - - - - • • • • •-i •A • • •
E E• ~y • • • • • • ! • • •
• • • • • • • • • •
Y``• . • . • • • . • • • • • • • . at 1•
• r • NAIL • • • • • • • A
•fIn WE ~ Sw • •
• • • • • • X
F _ N R • W ,Yt,•
• Cr hhC C•EE+~ e- •
t ...r ' r9011r
n
t(
1
y w • I•~CT ~
•t
Lib e t
BOWTA ~fIA: ~A1'VILLAGEJ
3A1Y0 CCN04,IIMIUr3
1011. •Y•LIC •0••••E
t A 1 1lji
N Lr ~ i d
w .t ,.III AVt.
1 1~
I
tine
~v ~.f • ---j / / / i
y
~I I ~ I M ~ , Lam/ / • • ~ A ~
V I t s I it ID
II
u I j ,'I • , _
1 • LOI•
Y 111 ' 1
11 C
A
3+. • : ~ b f 11 C •.a. sf a '".g AV
ABU]
I I 1~ s
AGENDA ITEM
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
HEARING DATE: October 3, 1989 - 7:30 P.M.
HEARING LOCATION: Tigard City Hall - Town Hall
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
A. FACTS
1. General Information
CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 89-07/Zone Change ZC 89-07
REQUEST: 1) Plan Map Amendment from Commercial Professional to
Medium-High Density Residential.
2) Zone Change from C-P (Professional/Administrative
Office Commercial) to R-25 (Multiple-Family
Residential, 25 Units Per Acre)
APPLICANT: Criterion Equities AGENT: OTAK, Inc.
(Mark Rockwell) (Ralph Tahran)
1800 One Main Place 17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd.
101 SW Main Street Lake Oswego, OR 97034
r Portland, OR 97204
OWNERS: David Metzger Raymond Ems
P.O. Box 275 13400 SW 76th Avenue.
Sherwood, OR 97140 Tigard, OR 97223
(Tax Lots 800 & 801) (Tax Lot 3600)
LOCATION: 13265 SW 72nd Avenue. Approximately 5.03 acres located on
the west side of SW 72nd Avenue, between SW Varns Street
and SW Fir Street (see vicinity map, Page 10)
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: WCTM 2S1 1DB, Tax Lots 800 and 801
WCTM 2S1 1DC, Tax Lot 3600 (portion)
2. Background Information
Creation of tax lots 800 and 801 from a single parcel was approved
through Minor Land Partition MLP 1-81. The Plan and zoning
designations for these parcels were changed from R-7 (Residential,
7,500 square feet minimum lot size) to their current Commercial
Professional/C-P designations during city-wide Plan and zoning map
revisions in 1983.
No other previous land use or development applications regarding these
properties have been reviewed by the City.
STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - 1
PAGE
3. Vicinity Information
i
Adjacent properties to the north, west, and southwest are zoned R-3.5
(Residential, 3.5 units per acre) and are developed with single family
residences. Properties directly south of the site are zoned C-P and
are presently vacant or occupied by single family residences. ?
Properties across SW 72nd Avenue from the site are also zoned C-P.
These properties are developed with a number of office buildings
containing a variety of commercial and professional uses.
The subject site has 367 feet of frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. SW 72nd
Avenue is functionally classified as a major collector street on the E'
City's Transportation Plan Map. SW 72nd Avenue is developed with 44 {
feet of pavement, curbs, storm drains, streetlights, and a sidewalk !
along the site's frontage.
The site has slightly more than 600 feet of frontage along SW Fir
Street. SW Fir Street consists of 20 feet of gravel covered right-of-
way which dead ends into the driveways of residences to the south of
the site. The Transportation Plan Map designates SW Fir Street as a
local street. Fully developed local streets typically consist of 50
feet of public right-of-way improved with full street improvements.
r 4. Site Information and Proposal Description
l
The subject property consists of three parcels totalling approximately
5.03 acres, including a 16.5 foot by 630 foot section of tax lot 3600
between SW Fir Street and the other involved parcels. The remainder`
of tax lot 3600 is not included in the proposed Plan Map Amendment and.
Zone Change proposal.
Tax lot 800 contains a house in its northeastern corner. The other
parcels are vacant. The site contains a grove of trees in the
northeastern corner of the site. The remainder of the site is mostly
open and covered with grasses, weeds, and fruit trees. The parcels
are relatively flat with a slight slope towards the east.
The applicants request a Plan Map Amendment from Commercial
Professional to Medium High Density Residential and a zone change from
C-P (Professional/Administrative Office Commercial) to R-25 (Multiple-
Family Residential, 25 Units Per Acre) for the subject parcels.
Although a development plan for the parcel need not be submitted for a
proposed plan/zone change, a conceptual site plan illustrating how the
site might be developed with a multiple-family residential development
has been provided by the applicants. The applicants' intent in F
providing the conceptual site plan was to illustrate that a multiple-
family development which would comply with the Community Development
Code's density transition requirements could be constructed on the
site. Code Section 18.40.040(A) requires that area within 100 feet
of an established area not be developed at a residential density
greater than 125 percent of the allowed density (as specified by the
Comprehensive Plan designation rather than the current zoning
STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 2
i
designation) of the adjacent established residential area. For the
subject properties, areas within 100 feet of the Rolling Hills
Subdivision to the north and west could not be developed at a density
greater than 6.25 units per acre because the maximum density allowed
by the Plan's Low Density Residential designation applied to Rolling j
Hills is 5 units per acre.
5. Agency and NPO Comments
The Engineering Division has reviewed the request and has commented
that development of the site with a multiple-family residential
development in the R-25 zone, would generate substantially fewer
vehicle trips per work day on adjacent streets as well as lesser '
traffic peaks at typical AM and PM rush hours as compared to office
development in the existing C-P zone, . Development of the site under
either the C-P or R-25 zones would require increasing the rights-of-
way for both SW 72nd Avenue and SW Fir Street and would also require
substantial improvements to SW Fir Street. Storm and sanitary sewers
to serve the site are available in SW 72nd Avenue.
NPO #5 has reviewed the proposal and has commented that they believe
that the majority of the neighbors of the subject property oppose the
project.
Planning Division staff attended a neighborhood meeting for review of
the proposal. Some neighbors commented that they favored the proposed
plan/zone amendment because they felt it provided the opportunity for
a quality development on the site as opposed to other uses that could
be located on the site under the present zoning. A number of
neighbors voiced opposition to the proposal and made comments related
to increased neighborhood traffic on evenings and weekends, the
potential "domino effect" this proposal might have on later rezoning
in the neighborhood, the compatibility between low density and high
density development, the need for additional multi-family housing
opportunities, and the effect this proposed action might have on
neighboring properties' values. Other comments related to specific
items the neighbors felt should be considered in the review of a site
development plan for the property.
The Building Division, the Tigard School District, and Metzger Water
District have reviewed the request and made no comments or objections
regarding the proposal.
No other comments were received.
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9,
10, 12, and 13; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 6.3.2,
6.3.3, 6.5.1, 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 7.8.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.3,
8.2.2, 9.1.2, and Chapter 12, Locational Criteria; and the change or
STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 3
t
1
i
F
l
mistake quasi-judicial map amendment criteria of both the Comprehensive
Plan and Community Development Code.
The Planning Division concludes that the proposal is consistent with the
applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the following
findings:
1. Goal #1 (Citizen Involvement) is met because the City has adopted a
citizen involvement program including review of all development
applications by Neighborhood Planning Organizations (NPO). In
addition, all public notice requirements have been satisfied for this
application.
2. Goal #2 (Land Use Planning) is met because the City has applied all
applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies,
and Community Development Code requirements to the review of the
proposal.
3. Goal #9 (Economy of the State) is satisfied, although the proposal
would reduce the City's inventory of developable commercial land,
because 1) the reduction of C-P zoned land proposed is not a large
amount compared to the total amount of developable C-P zoned land in
the immediate area and the Tigard Triangle area; and 2) allowing
( multi-family development near C-P and I-P zoned developable
properties may provide an attractive mix of land uses thereby helping
spur commercial and industrial development in the area. Other
communities have shown that such a mix of land uses can successfully
co-exist without adversely affecting commercial or industrial growth.
The applicants have pointed to the neighboring Kruse Way area of Lake
Oswego where such a mixture of land uses exists.
4. Goal #10 (Housing) is satisfied because the proposal will provide for
additional housing opportunities as promoted by the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the Metropolitan Housing Rule (Oregon
Administrative Rules, chapter 660, Division 7). Approval of the
proposal would increase housing opportunities on the City's
developable residential lands by a total of 125 dwelling units.
Approval would also provide increased opportunities for multi-family
development. The Metropolitan Housing Rule requires that the City
maintain.a minimum housing opportunity rate for developable land of 10
units per acre and a minimum 50/50 opportunity mix for single family
and multi-family housing.
5. Goal #12 (Transportation) and Goal #13 (Energy Conservation) would be
satisfied through providing the opportunity for an intensive land use
near major transportation corridors (Highway 217 and I-5) as well as
near employment centers. This promotes efficient use of the
transportation system thereby promoting energy conservation.
The Planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with
STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 4
i
i
applicable portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted
below:
1. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because Neighborhood Planning
organization #5 and surrounding property owners were given notice of
the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the proposal. In
addition, the applicants have met with the immediate neighbors of the
site to present their proposal in advance of the public hearings.
2. Plan Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied because the proposal would provide the
opportunity for additional multi-family development and would increase
the net housing opportunity on buildable lands in the City. This is
detailed in the discussion for Statewide Planning Goal 10 above and
the attached memo regarding the effect of both current plan/zone
amendment proposals on the City's compliance with the Metropolitan
Housing Rule.
3. Plan policies 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 will be satisfied because the proposal
would allow for development of the properties in ways that may be more
compatible with adjacent established low density residential areas
than the currently permitted uses of the C-P zone would be. Future
residential development of the parcels will be subject to density
transition limitations within 100 feet of the Low Density Residential
Plan designated areas to the north and west of the site. These
limitations would tend to lessen impacts on adjacent properties to a
greater extent than Code requirements applicable to development
proposals under the current Plan and zone designations. Both the
existing C-P zoning designation and the proposed R-25 zoning
designation allow a maximum building height of 45 feet. The C-P zone
requires 20 foot side yard and rear yard setbacks from residential
zones and thus under the current zoning designation, a 45 foot tall
building could be constructed within 20 feet of the abutting developed
residential parcels. Because the density transition requirements of
Policy 6.3.2(a) and Community Development Code Section 18.40.040(A)
would apply if the properties were zoned R-25, it is unlikely that
multi-family residential buildings taller than two stories tall would
be built within 100 feet of the properties' boundaries with adjacent
developed residential parcels - much less within 20 feet of those
properties. The applicants' conceptual site plan illustrates how
development of the site might occur in light of the density transfer
requirements. While the housing types allowed in the adjacent R-3.5
zone and the R-25 zone proposed for this site may be substantially
different, the density transition requirements along with Code
requirements regarding landscaping and buffering can be used to make
the differing housing types compatible.
4. . Plan Policy 6.5.1 will be satisfied through review of a development
proposal for the site through the Site Development Review and building
permit review processes to assure that developments on the site will
not create nuisances and that all buildings will comply with the
Uniform Building Code.
STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 5
5. Plan Policy 6.6.1 will be satisfied through the imposition of
buffering and screening requirements of the Community Development Code
to any future development proposal for the properties.
6. Plan Policies 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, and 7.6.1 are satisfied because
adequate public service capacities are available to serve potential t
development on the properties.
i
7. Plan Policy 7.8.1 is satisfied because the Tigard School District was l
informed of this proposal. The School District has not commented that
the proposed addition of housing opportunities within the District {
would cause exceeded capacities in the District's schools. The School
District has been making plans for increased school capacity through
several preliminary school construction and expansion proposals for
which funding has been approved through the recent school funding tax
levy request.
8. Plan Policy 8.1.1 commits the City to plan for a safe and efficient
street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated
future development. This policy would be satisfied because
development resulting from the proposed redesignation of these parcels
would tend to reduce the anticipated traffic onto SW 72nd Avenue and
other nearby streets as compared to development under the current
zoning. SW 72nd Avenue is a major collector street developed with
primarily commercial and industrial uses and with good connections to
several arterials. Although residential use of the site would be
anticipated to generate more nighttime and weekend traffic than most
of the permitted uses in the current C-P zone, that traffic would be
expected to be on SW 72nd Avenue and not on local streets in the
adjacent residential neighborhood. The Engineering Division will
review any future development proposal for the property and may
require improvements to affected public streets to reduce impacts
resulting from future developments.
9. Plan Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied as a condition of approval of any
future development of the properties. Necessary street improvements
would be required at the time of development. The City's Engineering
Division will review any future development proposals for the
properties.
10. Plan Policy 8.2.2 is satisfied because Tri-Met offers bus service on
SW 72nd Avenue on which the parcels have frontage. Therefore, the
proposed redesignation would locate an intensive type of development
within close proximity to an existing public transit route.
11. Plan Policy 9.1.2 is satisfied because the proposed redesignation
would provide the opportunity for high density residential development
in proximity to transit routes, major highways, and employment
centers thereby promoting efficient use of the transportation system
and reduced energy consumption.
STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 6
12. The Locational Criteria specified in Chapter 12 of the Plan for
Medium-High Density Residential use are satisfied for the following
reasons:
a. The subject properties are not committed to low density
development.
b. Density transition, buffering, and screening requirements of the
Community Development Code may be used to help make future
development on the subject properties compatible with neighboring
low density single family residences to the north and west.
C. The subject parcels have direct access to SW 72nd Avenue, a•major
collector street, and are in close proximity to Highway 217 and
I-5, both which are functionally classified as arterials.
d. Serious development-limitations affecting the properties, such as
steep slopes or poor drainage, are not evident. Essential
public facilities are present to serve future development on the
properties and have sufficient capacity to serve any increase in
demand caused by development of the site.
e. Public transit is available on SW 72nd Avenue in front of the
site.
f. The properties are located within one quarter mile of a business
and office center across SW 72nd Avenue from the site. The site
is also relatively close to the under-developed Tigard Triangle
area which is anticipated to be a major employment center in the
future. The applicants point out that there are few multi-
family housing opportunities, developed or undeveloped, within
close proximity to this future major employment center. '
Development of additional housing near the Triangle may result in '
reduced needs for automobile commuting between home and work. i
The applicants point to the successes of the Kruse Way corridor E
to the east as an example for the Triangle area of a successful
mix of new, high quality office development, mixed density t
residential development; and limited retail development.
h
i.
Although the site is some distance from convenience retail
services at this time, it is quite possible that convenience
retail uses may become available as adjacent properties and the
Triangle are developed.
g. The applicants anticipate that private open space as well as
recreational facilities will be provided as part of development
of the site.
In order to approve a quasi-judicial amendment to the Plan and zoning maps,
the City must also find that there is evidence of a change in the
neighborhood or community which affects the subject parcel. Alternatively,
the City must find that there has been a mistake or inconsistency made in
STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 7
the original designation of the parcel (Comprehensive Plan, Volume
2,Policy 1.1.1, Implementation Strategy 2; Community Development Code
Section 18.22.040(A)).
The applicants assert that a change in circumstances has occurred in that
there is now a significant demand for housing opportunities within close
proximity to employment centers. This sort of demand was not as evident
just a few years ago. Substantial recent growth in the region has led to
increased traffic congestion and increased commuting times. Proximity to
one's place of employment is now a major factor in deciding where to call
home. The housing industry has responded by developing all densities of
housing close to employment centers. The applicants point to the
neighboring Kruse Way area as an example of such a mixed use, mixed
residential density area that has developed in recent years. Opportunities
within the City of Tigard within one mile of the Triangle area for
developing any type of housing, especially multi-family housing, are
.extremely limited except for multi-family development above the first floor
in mixed use developments within the Triangle.
The Planning Division staff concurs with the applicants' assessment of the
increased demand for housing opportunities near employment centers. Our
assessment is based not only on our discussions with potential developers
but also on discussions with potential residents of the City looking to
live nearby their places of employment and with current residents who are
concerned with their increased commute times. We also have noticed an
increase in mixed use developments and less strict segregation of land
uses in other cities. Primarily because such mixtures of uses can result
in decreased traffic and fuel consumption, staff supports integration of
land uses where it is possible for the uses to harmoniously co-exist
through proper site planning.
Staff also believes that a mistake in the original Plan designation for
this site in particular as well as mistakes in the Plan Map city-wide exist
that the proposed action can help to rectify. It is difficult to assert
that a mistake was made in the Professional/Commercial designation of this
particular site in 1983 because of the extensive discussions and
deliberations regarding this site that occurred at that time.
Nevertheless, we believe that the mistake that was made here, and in other
locations throughout the city, was that not enough attention was paid to
the need for multiple family residential opportunities at locations such as
this that are near major employment centers, near commercial centers, near
major highway corridors, and near public transit corridors. By locating
higher density residential opportunities near employment/commercial centers
and with respect to transportation opportunities, reduced dependence on
automobile transportation could have been promoted and some of Tigard's
present traffic congestion could have been avoided with positive impacts
for the entire city. Instead, the current Plan Map designates the majority
of areas available for new multiple family residential development far from
employment and commercial centers. The primary areas that are designated
< for multi-family housing opportunities are at the far western and
southwestern edges of the city. The City Council and Planning Commission
are well aware of the difficulties that have arisen as these areas have
STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (criterion Equities) - PAGE 8
developed and as rapid growth has hit the city in general. A common
complaint in recent years has been the great increase in traffic in the
newly developing areas and in developed areas through which the new
residents must pass in their travels to I-5, Highway 217, and local
employment and commercial centers. Providing multi-family housing
opportunities nearer the Triangle, the SW 72nd Avenue Corridor, Washington
Square/Lincoln Center, the central business district, and near I-5 and
Highway 217 can help correct the mistakes of current Plan designations and
minimize future traffic congestion. We therefore find that the current
designation of this site can be categorized as a mistake in that it
represents a lost opportunity to serve the city as a whole through locating
multi-family housing opportunities close to typical traffic attractors.
Such a redirection will require difficult decisions regarding existing
neighborhoods, such as the Rolling Hills neighborhood, but we believe that
the density transition requirements of the Community Development code and
careful site selection and site plan scrutiny can be utilized to afford
compatibility between housing developments of differing intensities. We
find that the subject site is ideally located with regard to the Plan's
locational criteria for multiple family residential opportunities,
especially with respect to proximity to employment centers and highway and
transit access. We.. also find that the applicants' conceptual site plan
illustrates how the density transition requirement and careful site
planning could make high density residential use of this site largely
compatible with the adjacent low density residential development.
C. RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the findings and conclusions listed above, the Planning Division
recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation for
approval of CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 for the subject properties to Medium-High
Density Residential and R-25.
N d I A
PREP BY: er ffer RO Y: Re h Liden
Aa ant Planner Senior Planner
s
i
br/CPA8907.JO
STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 9
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Planning Commission
DATE: October 3, 1989
FROM: Jerry Offer and Deborah Stuart
Assistant Planners
SUBJECT: Metro Housing Rule compliance
The Metropolitan Housing Rule (Oregon Administrative Rule 660, Division 7)
requires that the average density allowed for all developable residential land
within the City's original planning area be a minimum of ten dwelling units per
acre. Two plan amendment proposals before you tonight could affect the City's
overall housing opportunity index or allowable density on lands that are
classified by the Plan as buildable residential lands.
The City's Plan, as acknowledged by LCDC in 1984, inventoried 1,311 acres of
developable residential land in the City. Zoning at that time provided for a
housing opportunity of 13,110 units, just meeting the Metropolitan Housing Rule
standard. Since that time, eight Plan amendments have been approved which have
affected the inventory. Those redesignations provide a current inventory of
! 1,290 acres and a housing opportunity for 13,112 units (10.16 units per acre).
s
s
The two proposals before the Commission will have somewhat counter effects on
the amount of developable residential acreage and the housing opportunity i.
index. The Gross proposal (CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08) would reduce the amount of
developable residential land by approximately 2 acres and the housing
opportunity index by 47 units. The Criterion Equities proposal (CPA 89-07/ZC
89-07) would increase the amount of developable land by approximately 5 acres
and the City's housing opportunity index by 125 units. The effect of these
proposals, singly and jointly, on the developable lands inventory and the
housing opportunity index is displayed below.
b
1. Approval of Gross proposal
Developable acres - 1,288 acres
C
Potential dwelling units - 13,065 units
Housing opportunity index - 10.14
i
2. Approval of Criterion Equities proposal
Developable acres - 1,295
Potential dwelling unit - 13237 dwelling units
Housing opportunity index 10.22
3. Approval of both proposals
Developable acres - 1,293 acres
Potential Dwelling units - 13,190 dwelling units
Housing opportunity index - 10.20 units/acre
C TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 3, 1989
1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM. The meeting was
held at the Tigard Civic Center - TOWN HALL - 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,
Tigard, Oregon.
r
2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Castile, Pyre,
Leverett, Rosborough, and Saporta.
s
Absent: Commissioners Barber, and Peterson.
Staff: Assistant Planner Jerry Offer (left 10:00 PM);
Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart; Planning
Secretary Diane M. Jelderks. F
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES s
Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Rosborough seconded to approve
the minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners
present. Commissioner Saporta abstained.
t
4. PLANNING COMMISSION C X*1UNICATION
o President Moen announced that Agenda Item 5.3, an appeal from NPO 3
( regarding manufactured homes, is being postponed to the October 17th
l Planning Commission hearing.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-07 AND ZONE CHANGE ZC 89-07
METZGER-EMS/ROCKWELL NPO #5 A request for approval of a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment from (commercial Professional) to Medium-High Density
residential and a Zone Change from C-P (Commercial Professional) to R-25
(Residential, 25 units/acre). ZONE: C-P (Commercial Professional)
LOCATION: West side of SW 72nd Avenue, between SW Varns Street and SW Fir
Street (WCTM 2S1 1DB, tax lots 800 & 801, 2S1 1DC, tax lot 3600)
Assistant Planner Jerry offer reviewed the proposal and staff's reasons
for recommending approval. Discussion followed regarding maximum
building heights of the existing and proposed zones and the density
transition required between a R-3.5 and R-25 zone. Also discussed was why
the staff was recommending approval of the R-25 rather than the R-12 zone.
APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION
i
o Mark Rockwell, Criterion Equities, 1800 One Main Place, 101 SW Main St.,
Portland, OR 97204, reviewed the existing condition of the property and 4
uses which would be permitted under the existing C-P zoning. He reviewed.
reasons for and the need for the proposed change from C-P to Residential,
and why R-25 versus R-12 would be better suited for the property.
p~
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - , 1989 - PAGE 1 f
i
l
( w
o Ralph Tahran, OTAK Architects, 17355 SW Boones Ferry Road, Lake Oswego, OR
97035, explained that this proposal would minimize exposure to the single
family residential area and is not designed to the maximum density which
would be permitted. He compared design and site development review
standards between the C-P and R-25 zone. He stated that the traffic from
an R-25 development would have less conflict during peak times than C-P
traffic and that they are willing to commit to the design concept that
they are proposing. `
i
f
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
t
o Craig Hopkins, NPO # 5 Chairperson, stated that the NPO was impressed with
the proposal. However, they are supporting the neighborhood in their
opposition to the proposal. They feel that the Comprehensive Plan
provides for orderly development of the area and that the C-P zoning
should be maintained.
o Jack Stiger, Steiger Enterprises, Inc., 10250 SW Greenburg Road, Tigard, E'
OR. 97223, stated he has shown the site several times and feels that the
site is better suited for a high quality, high density residential use.
o Gordon Ring, 4214 SW 51st Place, Portland, Or 97221, Commercial Realtor
for Cushman Wakefield stated he had passed on listing this site as it is
inappropriate for commercial professional use and would be better suited
to high density residential.
o Dale Rossman, 13355 SW 76th, Tigard, OR., 97223, lives 200 feet from the s.
west end of the project. He supports staff's recommendation for
approval. He felt it would increase the value of property and enhance the
area for future development.
r
o Raymond Ems, 13440 SW 76th, Tigard, OR. 97223, had owned the majority of
s
the land that is now the Rolling Hills Subdivision. He felt the proposal
would clean up the area, that there is a high demand for residences in
this area, and that there are probably 500 jobs available within a five
minute walking distance from the proposal.'
f.
o David Metzger, Rt. 4 Box 267C, Sherwood, OR., representing his mother who
owns the property, stated that the property has been listed for 9 years
and they have been told repeatedly that this is a poor site for office
use. He added that a large number of offices across the street have
remained vacant. They have had several offers for the front half of their
property which would leave the back half, which abuts the residential'
area, with a structure that would be constructed of less quality than the s:
multi-family structures proposed. f'
i
o James Powell, 7660 SW Fir, Tigard, OR., lives two to three houses away.
He was concerned that it had been decided in 83/84 how the site would f
develop and that now there is a change in thinking, and the developer
wants to change the use. He was opposed to the change in principle.
Discussion followed regarding the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - , 1989 - PAGE 2
o Bob Sudlow, 7530 SW Varna, Tigard, OR. 97223, supported the proposal. He
would prefer single family residential but realizes that is not
practical. He stated there has been no growth under the current
circumstances and felt the proposal would increase property values.
Currently the residential area is an island and if the site is developed
as commercial professional it will further fragment the residential
island.
o Staff submitted letters of support from Leonard Ludwig, First Portland
Leasing Corp.; John Decosta, Professionals 100; Jim and Nancy Wryn; and
Wallace Harding, Harding Fletcher Company.
o Bruce MacKay, 7430 SW Cherry Dr., Tigard, OR. 97223, abuts the a3outh
boundary of the property. He had investigated the zoning at the time of
purchase and had made his decision to buy on the basis that the abutting
property would develop as commercial professional and opposed changing the
zone to multi-family.
o Jerry Howe, 13280 SW 76th, Tigard, OR. 97223, lives adjacent to the
proposal and had purchased his home a year and a half ago because of the
large lots and low traffic. He felt if the site is developed as
commercial professional, the traffic would end after 5:00 pm. If the site
developes as multi-family, he felt traffic would occur at all hours, that
higher crime rate would result, and that the multi-family area would not
be maintained to the neighborhood's standards. He questioned how many
times will they have to face rezoning issues?
o Ray Piricl, 7745 SW Varna, Tigard, OR. 97223, neither favors or opposes
the request. He stated that this site had been a major issue during the
Comprehensive Plan process, originally it was zoned I-P and as a comprise
was zoned C-P. He added that the Rolling Hills Subdivision is a special
case and the City had made a commitment to protect the subdivision and he
felt the City should honor that commitment.
o Earla Guerra, 7670 SW Cherry Drive, Tigard, OR. 97223, was concerned what
would happen to other adjacent vacant land if this site is allowed to
change to high density residential. She opposed the change.
o Joanne Bieker, 7730 SW Cherry, Tigard, OR. 97223, requested that the
property remain C-P. She did not feel the City had taken care of problems
such as the apartments to the north of the subdivision.
o Millie Cox, 13320 SW 76th Ave., Tigard, OR. 97223, stated they had
purchased their property two and a half years ago knowing that they
abutted C-P zoning. They would not have purchased if the property had
been zoned for multi-family. She stated the subdivision has approximately
65 quiet, large, well kept lots and that the proposal would more than
double the population. She was also concerned that property value would
go down.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - , 1989 - PAGE 3
- o Ron Raton, 13395 SW 72nd Ave., Tigard, OR 97223, resident for 18 years was
concerned about what effect the proposed exit/entrance would have on his
road. His other concerns were that crime would increase, evening and
weekend noise would increase, population would triple, and what would
happen to the other vacant eight acres to the south which are in close
proximity to this site along Fir Street.
0 Sharon Takahashi, 7610 SW Cherry Dr., Tigard, OR. 97223, stated she has
been a member of NPO # 5 since 1981 and they have had to protect the
neighborhood against Tech Center, Hillside/Hunziker, and the batch plant.
She did not feel that there was an error in the plan and if there is a
need for additional multi-family that the Tigard Triangle should be
evaluated for that use.
o Ed Gordon 7475 SW Cherry Dr., Tigard, OR. 97223, stated he owns
apartments and has concerns for the problems that high density living
creates such as traffic at all hours. He opposed the change.
o Dennis Worznick, 7495 SW Cherry, Tigard, OR. 97223, opposed the request.
He felt that lack of housing should be put in the Tigard Triangle. He
was concerned that adjacent vacant property would be changed to R-25 if
this proposal is approved.
o Jim Jackson, 7380 SW Varns, Tigard, Or. 97223, located on the north side
of the project likes the look of the project, however, has concerns
regarding crime, noise, and air quality from fireplaces.
C o Greg Weber, 7425 SW Varns, Tigard, OR. 97223, opposed the request. He
was concerned about air pollution and traffic.
o Tom Brian, 7630 SW Fir, Tigard, OR. 97223, nearby, not adjacent, did not
feel a substantial change had been made to justify the change and that
market changes come and go. Many owners had purchased homes based upon
the existing zoning and he felt the Comprehensive Plan should be relied
upon. He noted that the criteria is the same for R-25 zone as it is for
the C-P zone, that the City is in compliance with the housing goal, that
additional residential uses (R-40) are allowed in the Tigard Triangle
above the first floor, and that if housing is targeted in the wrong area
this should be addressed during periodic review. He added that a
neighborhood meeting had voted 30 to 3 to keep the C-P zone and that
economic circumstances should not be balanced on the backs of this
neighborhood. He requested denial. However, if the Commission chose to
recommend approval he suggested that the applicant be required to sit down
with the neighborhood and come up with some restrictive covenants.
REBUTTAL
o Mark Rockwell stated that the applicants are willing to commit to
restrictive covenants. He felt that the reason the neighbors are happy
with the C-P zoning is because of the vacant site they have not been
exposed to the uses which would be permitted, several of which would not
t end at 5:00 pm. In addition, they could have a 45 foot tall concrete
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - , 1989 - PAGE 4
building 20 feet from their property line. He felt 9 years was a long
time to ask a property owner to be patient. Also, that traffic would be
50% less than a commercial development and would not penetrate the
neighborhood. He felt that the concerns for increased crime are unfounded
and that even homes in the Rolling Hills Subdivision have been allowed to
run down; that the $50,000 units they proposed would not denigrate but
would enhance the area and increase home values. He did not feel the R-40
density allowed above the first floor in the Triangle was a serious zone
as it has not even been able to work downtown Portland.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
o Commissioner Leverett favored the request.
o Commissioner Rosborough felt that this was a high quality proposal.
However, he was unsure whether the criteria had been met. He did not feel
a mistake had been made.
o Commissioner Castile was impressed with the design, however, he felt the
C-P zone should be preserved.
O Commissioner Pyre felt that this is a good development; however, there
are no guarantees that this is the project that would be constructed. He
did not feel that the criteria had been met for a change. He felt that
/ perhaps the entire area should be looked at for a change to multi-family.
o Commissioner Saporta did not feel the criteria had been met.
o President Moen-was concerned that the criteria had not been met to warrant
a change. He had a problems with abutting R-25 and R-3.5 zones. He felt
that density transition and buffering help, however Rolling Hills is
unique and the City did make a commitment to protect the subdivision.
O Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Castile seconded to forward
CPA 89-07 and ZC 89-07 to City Council with a recommendation for denial
based on the finding that the proposal did not meet the criteria to allow
a change in the Comprehensive Plan.
5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-08 ZONE CHANGE ZC 89-08 GROSS
NPO #7 A request for approval of a comprehensive Plan Amendment from
Medium-High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and a Zone
Change from R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) to C-N (Commercial,
Neighborhood). ZONE: R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) LOCATION:
Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW
135th Avenue. (WCTM 1S1 33CA, Tax Lot 100)
Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart reviewed the proposal, the proposed road
r improvements, and made staff's recommendation for denial.
~S
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - , 1989 - PAGE 5
PROFESSIONALS 100, INC., REALTORSO
Mr. Jerry Offer
Community Development Department
City of Tigard
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Ammendment and Zone Change
for 13265 S.W. 72nd. Avenue; 2S1 1DB, tax lots 800 S
801, a portion of 2S1 1DC, tax lot 3600)
Dear Mr. Offer:
Based on my experience in marketing the property, there are
several reasons why I recommend approval of the proposed
Comprehensive Plan Ammendment.
First, the site is not large enough to accommodate C-P
projects of substantial scope and quality. Second, the
site is disproportionately deep in relationship to its width
and frontage on S.W. 72nd. This eliminates most C-P
developments as greater width and visibility are nearly
always important requirements.
These limitations result in two small sites. one on the
front that is 2-2.5 acres, and the balance of the property
in the back making up a second "landlocked" site of a
similar size.
If the current zoning is maintained, I fully expect the
property will be divided into two parcels as we have had
interest from various individuals to purchase the front
portion to build a small office or commercial building.
That leaves the "landlocked" back half of the property
undeveloped and with relatively little value. Given these
circumstances, I would not anticipate that the development
on the property will be of high quality, particularly on
the back half.
However, if the Comprehensive Plan amendment and zone change
are made, the opposite is true. The size, shape, and
location of the property are excellent for accommodating a
high quality multi-family development. Furthermore, the
change would help to adjust a significant imbalance in
available land. At present there is a large supply of
undeveloped C-P land yet there is no R-25 land available in
or near the Tigard Triangle.
Sincerely,
ohn Decosta
Lake Oswego Branch • "Kruse Woods One", 5285 S.W. Meadows Rd., Suite 161, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 • (503) 636-4545
r
MA. and Mu. James H. WAyn
~2 1989 7570 S.W. CheAAy Drive i;
/J ~C t Tigcvcd, Oicegon 97223
n1tti~~5Y~~mun►t~Devetapmeat
TigaAd
City Hate
Tigard, OAeg o n
Regarding: Zone change Son Rotting HUP6 Estates
Dean Couneie, FAiend and Newghbots,
We aAe dowry we eoued not be here tonight in peAzon, but vie wooed tike to
tend our support in avoA o6 the zone change.
We beet these wowed be beautibue, welt kept apa&tnents. geaut.i~ut tandseaping
and welt maintained. The buitdetus have o66eAed to give us this assurance
in w1titing. They would be mote attAaetive than a steti,te o55.ice building, and
we have no assukan.ce that an oj6.ice building wilt be built: there. It could be
any numbeA oj us.inesses. It coned be a day cane eenteA, with say a hundred
parents coming and going twice a day at peak tAa55.ic houAA. It eoutd be and
Etks on Moose Lodge built: there with many night time activities going on.
TheAe are empty o66ices ae,e oveA T.igand, Who wowed want to build another o66ice
bu t.d ing to stand vacant. Take a wa e.k around youA neighborhood and took at
the empty o66ices 5oA tent.
Tnabs.ic--We are doomed to have mote ttajj.ic, no matteA what is bu,iZt there.
We think it would be better to have mote cars than 18 wheeeeu making and pick-
ing up deUveAi.es 6&om a business on warehouse. These apartment dwetters
are not ate going to be poun,i,ng out onto 72nd street at 7:45 A.M. each morning,
they wilt be coming and going just as you and I do, at va&i.ous hours.
We 6ee.e you woued be better o6j with these nice apartments bih.i,nd you than what
we have. We know what it is Zi,ke to be awakened in the night by someone pound=
ing .6t ea oA dropping guess in the dumps.teA, oA t&ucks .idt i.ng hatb the night,
waiting 5oA a pickup. Believe me you don't want that.
We think most o6 the tesidenta o4 Rotting H.c,P,es wou ed tike to see this .land
remain as it cz, but with .eared in such shc&t suppey, it can not be.
Someone is going to bu.i.P_d something on this ta.n.d and we wooed Aathen see
it be a beautijue devetopement than a pig .in._a poke. We have enough ugly
on 72nd, .let's have some pretty jot a change.
l Regards,
r't
andy Wtyn
119/19~/tSJ 19:! : sb t1 b193 'L~y 'l513 HANV I NG eLl&'I C htLK CITY OF T I UAKV t~ ouz
MORTGAGE BANKERS P-:::4 ANp REAL ESTATE CONSULTANTS
Wft
Ontober 3. 1989
Mr. Jerry Offer
Community Development Department
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard. Oregon 97223
RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change
from Commercial Professional (C-P) to Residential R-25
13265 SW 72nd Avenue
Tigard, Oregon
Dear Mr. Offer:
For the past 28 years. I have been involved in financing a wide
assortment of real estate developments throughout Portland and
the State of Oregon. My background includes reviewing prospec-
tive development sites and assessing proposed projects' financial
feasibility. This year we anticipate Harding Fletcher will
finance over 100 million dollars in real estate, much of which is
in the Portland area.
The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change repre-
sent a very positive opportunity for the immediate neighborhood
and the community at large.
The site in quratlun lu out well suited for C-P development. It
has relatively little frontage in comparison to its overall
depth. The C-P zone also permits a wide assortment of uses (many
of which would not be desirable neighbors to the adjoining homes)
to place varied types of buildings up to a minimum of only 201
from the adjacent residential lots..
It is unlikely the property will be developed as a quality office
location. The office bulldings on the east side of SW 72nd
Avenue have not been as financially successful as had been
originally antlulpated. Rental rates continue to be below the
overall office market, and vacancies are high.
Re-zoning the property to k-25 accomplishes several things:
1. The site is the correct size. shape and location for a
financially successful multi-family development.
2. Tigard has very little multi-family land available in
that area of town and the zone change would respond to
that need.
Liao Center Tower* Suite 1050.825 N.E. Multnomah, Portland. OR 97232 -Phone (503) 235.4328 -FAX (503) 239-7513
lr1/ t/.i/ ua UA . J L U iJVJ L:J.7 f Al:l IlN(W 11%U I' L.L' I W IL' 1l V I I 1 Ur 1111t11W yJ UUJ
Mr. Jerry offer
Ocluber 3. 1989
Page 2
3. A multi-family residential project is more compatible
with the adjoining single family development. It would
act as a buffer between the homes and the more intense
commercial and industrial uses and thus serve to rein-
force and preserve the Rolling Hills neighborhood.
I strongly encourage the City of Tigard to adopt the proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendment and Zone Change from G-P to H-25.
ours very ruly
WL C~
Wallace E. Harding, CMB
President
WCH/jg
r
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #5
After a brief introduction to Tigard's new police chief, Ran
Goodpaster, our NPO adjourned to the city hall conference room to
deal with the night's agenda. Present were Chair Craig Hopkins,
Orm Doty, Wendy Hawley, Wayne MacKinnon, Larry Schmidt and Sharon
Takahashi. Guests this evening were Dick Bauer and Martha
Bishop.
The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. and the minutes of
the previous meeting were approved as submitted.
i
Unfinished business:
1. The question of the congestion and confusing lane markings on
the 72nd Avenue overpass has had attention drawn to it and a
letter has been sent to the Regional Highway Board.
2. The speed on Hall from Hunziker to Durham has also been
similarly addressed.
f
New business:
*8: SDR 89-22IV89-28: This item was moved up in the agenda to
accommodate Mr. Bauer, a principal in the issue, and Mr.
Schmidt. Schmidt's Sanitary Service is seeking to expand and
Y
relocate a nonconforming sanitary service business. A new j
truck barn and areas to place recycling bins and containers
away from the adjacent residential property are planned.
Fuel tanks are to be removed or decommissioned by Oct. of t
1990 and new fencing will be added. A second driveway will
be added to access property on west side of house. This plan.
was an amicable solution to both Mr. Bauer and Mr. Schmidt.
1: HOP 89-33: Sunset Wall Covering. Michael Lehman of 7925 SW s
Ashford. No objection voiced.
2. SDR Appeal of Colling Firs at Durham Road. Information
only. Final appeal denied.
4. S 89-07: Bristol/McMonagle proposal to divide 2.48 acre
parcel into 13 lots. No objection seen as it is allowable
use and development.
5. SDR 89-16/V 89-23: Edwards/Castile proposal for commercial
landscape construction and nursery business. Has been
granted by the planning commission.
6. SDR 89-19: Pactrust Buildings 218 and 220 in Oregon Business
Park III. No objection.
7. SDR 89-19: Two buildings in Pacific Corporate Center. No
objection.
i'
9: CPA 89-07/cc 89-07: Metzger-Ems/Rockwell. Request for a
comp plan amendment and cone change to allow 110 apartment
units on 72nd Avenue, between Varns and Fir. The membership
of the NPO had no strong feelings on the proposal but urged
the residents of the'area to attend the informational meeting
to be help at Phil Lewis School on Sept. 27, at 7:30 p.m. At
that time they will be able to ask questions and voice their
opinions on the project.
}
'r:
L
~o~~~,~~® ~.~~►se~G comma.
FORMERLY CHARTER EQUIPMENT LEASING CORP. OF THE NORTHWEST
September 29, 1989
t.
Mr. Jerry Offer
Community Development Department
City of Tigard
Tigard, OR 97223 !
RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for E.
13265 S.W. 72nd. Avenue; 2S1 1DB,(tax lots 800 & 801, a por-
tion of 2S1 1DC, tax lot 3600)
Dear Mr. Offer:
Since I am unable to attend the public hearing on Tuesday, October
3rd, I am writing you this letter. As a property owner on south-
west Varns street, I want to express my strong support for the
proposed comprehensive plan amendment and zone change.
a`
As you are aware, in addition to the large employment base already
located in this area, Tigard has plans that call for developing
thousands of new jobs within the Tigard Triangle as well as a
large number for the southern end of S.W. 72nd. However, to my
knowledge, there are no
provisions in place to provide for any new
multi-family housing within the triangle and there is very little
inventory of multi-family land in the east and northeast portions
of Tigard, and that is particularly true of land designated R-25.
The proposed change is a step in the right direction. It's a mis-
take to plan for thousands of new jobs and not accommodate the ob-
vious need for additional multi-family housing.
Sincerely,
Leonard Ludwig,
.
President 4
LL:dab
O CT 0 21989
7145 S.W. Varns Street • Portland, Oregon 97223-8057 • (503) 684-3417
Fax: (503) 684-0087
REQUEST FOR A PLAN AMENDMENT
AND ZONE CHANGE
COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL (CP) TO
MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R25)
CRITERION EQUITIES
1800 ONE MAIN PLACE
101 SW MAIN STREET
PORTLAND, OREGON 97204
k Q
d~ a
AUGUST 149 1989
architects, p.c.
1 i355 S.W. &Wes Ferry Rd.
take0swego.OR 97035 (503) 63s-3618
A REQUST FOR A
PLAN AMENDMENT
w
- AND
ZONE CHANGE
FROM COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL (C-P)
TO MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY (R-25) RESIDENTIAL
r Prepared for:
CRITERION EQUITIES
1800 One Main Place
101 SW Main Street
Portland, OR 97204
Prepared by:
- OTAK ARCHITECTS, P.C.
17355 S.W. Boones Ferry Road
Lake Oswego, OR 97035
August 14, 1989
I
t
PROPOSED: A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change from
Commercial Professional (C-P) to Medium-High Density (R-25)
Residential.
l
LOCATION: A 5.03 acre parcel of land fronting on the west side of SW 72nd Avenue
between SW Varns Street and SW Fir Street. j
LEGAL j
DESCRIPTION: Tax lots 800, 801, 2Si, IDD and a 16.5 foot wide strip of the northerly
portion of tax lot 3600, 2S 1, 1DC., Tigard, Oreg.,n.
Total area: 5.03 Acres.
r
Y
{C
~t
E
a
6
r
qi(
L
1
INTRODUCTION
This application is to seek an amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan to
change a 5.03 acre Commercial Professional parcel to Medium-High Density (R-25)
Residential. In the Comprehensive Plan Policies, the Commercial Professional Zone
and the Medium-High Density (R-25) Residential Zone must meet the same locational
Y criteria, to suggest that the land uses are somewhat interchangeable. We believe that a
change in circumstances has occurred since the original designation on the Comprehensive
Plan and the remainder of this narrative will serve as the supporting documentation. The
C~ Tigard Triangle area is developing as a high quality business center much like the Kruse
Way Corridor to the east of the site. The Kruse Way Corridor has an added dimension to
this business center concept, by providing a mix of housing types so the public can live close
^ to their employment. A similar situation is possible in the Tigard Triangle but there is a
shortage of sites that would be available to develop high quality multi-family in close
proximity to the business centers. The subject site does not have the size or site
configuration necessary to develop as a business park or office park to effectively compete
as a viable commercial use. It also appears as though a commercial use would intrude more
into the residential area just by the nature of its design requirements. A multi-family
project must meet more strict design requirements and screening and buffering to fit into
the site more positively. We have designed for this amendment proposal a suitable
residentially scaled attractive project that proposes significant screening, setbacks and buffers
from the existing residences. The multi-family market remains extremely strong and, in this
case, provides a housing choice that is not available at this time to complement the Tigard
6 Triangle.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The site is an approximately 5.03 acre relatively flat parcel of land gently sloping from west
to the eastern boundary. The property fronts on a major collector, SW 72nd Avenue and
SW Fir Street. Single-family development abuts the site on the northern and western
boundary. Across SW 72nd to the east is a business park. A nice collection of mature trees
exist along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage and will remain with the proposed project. The
site is a rectangular shape that goes deeply into the residential area and has all public
facilities available.
r
2
r
CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
i
PLAN POLICY 1.1.2 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
_ change is consistent with Plan Policies
and change in circumstances affecting parcel or neighborhood, or
a mistake in original land use designation s
As will be discussed in great detail, this request for a change to Medium-High Density
Residential is consistent with all the applicable Plan Policies and locational criteria for
_ Medium-High Density Residential designation.
Changes in circumstances have taken place affecting this parcel, neighborhood, metropolitan
housing policies and the preference the public has indicated in the past few years to live
closer to their places of employment. As the Tigard Triangle area continues to develop, a
pattern much like the Kruse Way area is resulting, an area of high quality development
on major transportation corridors where people can work in the office and business centers'
and have a choice of quality housing opportunities, mixes of single-family and multi-family;, €
in effect, a mixed use development on a broader scale.
The subject parcel meets all the locational criteria outlined in the Comprehensive Plan for
a Medium-High Density Residential Zone designation. Development of nearby business
centers and the absence of high quality multi-family housing in the immediate area make
this an ideal site to provide housing for the continuing development of the business and
office parks. i
Metropolitan housing policies have caused a change in circumstances since the original
adoption of Comprehensive Plans, increasing housing density requirements on communities
to approximately 10 units per acre, up from an original mandate of approximately 8 units
per acre. Recent decisions by Metro to limit extending the Urban Growth Boundary changes
C the circumstances to continue to develop more intensely. These recent policies, Metro wide, `
along with the continuing demand for multi-family housing and the public's increasing desire F
- to live closer to where they work to minimize commute time and increase leisure time make
this an attractive, ideally located Medium-High Density Residential site.
E
r PLAN POLICY 2.1.1 NEIGHBORHOOD REVIEW OF PROPOSAL is
For a comprehensive review of our proposal by the neighborhood, we will implement all the
strategies outlined in the Plan Policies. We will inform. and meet with the appropriate
c" Neighborhood Planning Organization up until the scheduled hearing date. The Plan
Amendment process assures that affected owners are notified. The City also assists the
process in providing meeting areas in City Hall.
1
3
PLAN POLICY 6.1.1 INCREASED HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES
The policy is satisfied by offering housing development to occur, to the greatest extent
possible, on designated buildable lands in areas where public facilities and services can be
readily extended to those lands. All services are available to this site and the proposed
design preserves the trees and character along the 72nd Avenue frontage to the maximum
extent. The proposal would provide for additional multi-family development and would
increase the net housing opportunity on buildable lands in the City. The City is obligated
through the Metropolitan Housing Rule to provide for an equal housing opportunity mix of
single-family and multi-family units with an overall development density of 10 units per
acre. This redesignation request would further the City's compliance with these
requirements.
y, PLAN POLICIES 6.3.2 AND 6.3.3 COMPATIBILITY WITH LOWER DENSITY
ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL ZONE
` These policies will be satisfied through strict buffering and screening criteria in the
Community Development Code. The density within 100 feet of each property line abutting
residential will not exceed 2510 over the density shown on the Comprehensive Plan for the
adjacent land. The increased setbacks, density limitations and height restrictions will
mandate a development more compatible with adjacent residential areas than the existing
zone designation of Commercial Professional.
PLAN POLICY 6.6.1 BUFFERING AND SCREENING
This policy will be satisfied through the Design Review process. This proposal will be
subject to more stringent buffering and screening requirements than the current allowed use
of Commercial Professional. In general, we also intend to increase the buffer by placing
garages against the property line areas abutting residential to form a solid secure buffer.
f PLAN POLICIES 7.1.2. 7.2.1. 7.4.4, 7.6.1 PUBLIC FACIL117 AND SERVICE
C CAPABILITIES
{ The Policies are satisfied because adequate public service capacities are available to serve
development on the property. Sanitary sewer and water is available on SW 72nd Avenue.
Site drainage will be directed to nearby storm sewers. A 2/3 street improvement on Fir
Street will be required. Erosion control techniques will be included as part of the site
development plan.
PLAN POLICY 7.8.1 ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL SYSTEM
The Tigard School District is being informed of this proposal. A new addition to the
Durham Elementary School is nearly completed. It is our understanding that the School
District is also reviewing proposed changes to school attendance boundaries to alleviate
overcrowding in existing classrooms and to provide additional capacity to serve future
growth.
r
4
PLAN POLICY 8.1.1 SAFE AND EFFICIENT STREET SYSTEM AND PLAN
POLICY 8.1.3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed development directly abuts SW 72nd Avenue a developed major collector street.
Street right of way will be dedicated along SW 72nd Avenue and SW Fir Street. Our
development will construct a 2/3 street improvement on SW Fir Street to serve as access to
our development, so that traffic from our development will not pass through existing
neighborhoods. Tri-Met service is available abutting the site at SW 72nd Avenue.
PLAN POLICY 8.2.2 LOCATING INTENSIVE LAND USE IN AREAS SERVED BY
PUBLIC TRANSIT
This policy is satisfied because Tri-Met offers bus service on SW 72nd Avenue, less than one
quarter mile from the properties. The proposed redesignation would locate an intensive type
of development on an existing public transit route to maximize use.
PLAN POLICY 12.1.1 LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FOR MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The proposal is in complete agreement with the outlined locational criteria for Medium-
High Density Residential use.
i
1. Density transition, buffering and screening requirements of the Community
Development Code will assure that the development will be compatible with adjacent
residences.
2. The proposed development plan maximizes the privacy of the existing residential area.
3. The subject parcel fronts on and has direct access to SW 72nd Avenue, a major collector
street.
k
4. The subject site is relatively flat, with sparse tree cover, and is fully serviced; so no
development limitations exist.
5. Tri-Met service is available on 72nd so public transit is available within one quarter:
mile.
c 6. A business center is located across SW 72nd from the site. Convenience retail service
is also available nearby. Also relevant is the part increased housing opportunities will
play in the development of the Tigard Triangle, an area that will provide a mix of uses;
employment centers with complementing housing areas, much like the Kruse Way
Corridor is developing to the east of the subject site.
t 7. The proposed development will provide its own open space and recreational facilities.
5
•i
COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LCDC GOALS AND GUIDELINES
GOAL I - CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
This application follows the Plan Amendment process and the subsequent notification
procedures required to insure the general public may become involved in the planning
process. Additionally, neighborhood meetings will be held to present our proposal to the E-
immediate area. i.
GOAL 2 - LAND USE PLANNING
h~ By following the designated process and by providing a factual basis to support said change,
this amendment conforms to said goal.
GOAL
GOAL 3 -AGRICULTURAL
i
Not applicable.
GOAL 4 - FOREST LANDS
Not applicable.
` GOAL 5 - OPEN SPACE SCENIC AND HISTORICAL AREAS AND NATURAL
RESOURCES`
- Not applicable, except for open space requirements of the Medium-High Density (R-25)
Residential Zone.
- GOAL 6 - AIR WATER AND LAND RESOURCE QUALITY
The development would conform to all environmental quality statutes, rules and standards.
GOAL 7 - AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND HAZARDS
Not applicable.
GOAL 8 - RECREATIONAL NEEDS
Not applicable.
GOAL 9 -ECONOMY OF STATE ;
U
The subject project will provide jobs and services to residents of the State. Development of
the site will have a positive influence on the tax base.
6
i
GOAL 10 - HOUSING
The proposal will provide for additional housing opportunities as promoted by the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the Metropolitan Housing Rule. The Metropolitan Housing Rule
requires that the City maintain a minimum housing opportunity rate for developable lands
of 10 units per acre and a minimum 50/50 opportunity mix for single-family and multi-
family housing.
GOAL 11 - PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Urban services exist on or in close proximity to the subject site. The proposed Plan
Amendment would allow for the use of these facilities and services in an efficient and
reasonable manner.
GOAL 12 - TRANSPORTATION
The proposed use would make efficient use of a major transportation corridor.
GOAL 13 - ENERGY CONSERVATION
Greater efficiency is achieved by placing increased intensity along high capacity
transportation corridors.
GOAL 14 - URBANIZATION
The site is within the Urban Growth Boundary.
r
7
4-.~w•F V 01
a ~d5'-' ~~N U
OV
urC S4 ~-7 o Of °~1f / 'fi . o ~Q5
OVI
t fj ~i4a 1 t✓ t~ t ` s ^ X~ cOf1 Zt.osz
04 ta
aye + Ci .~d Q~ L+p f~ 4 ~ ~ V M yZ•6o x ftGlZIZ u
A ~OZb o, U" ( y 1 ° ,
104
jDVI
(J+ A
.69 S
1• `Ta 1 L~.i
N
9f ~ rJ ~ p ` J bt• b' .
• •z
00" J
o p N
° ea to
9Z " "LZ
0,0 fig.
60' ov C3
of OZ ,6aN Set Z s o Z o L 0 L f y. fa 1n` t
dl ~ ,p tt,,..~, ''Q ° •t" fy•f ZI Q61.p :.P~-~Q~~4 G
prop 60L fyf~1 f 2 Z1
N / ~Qb•f I
tq•Z o~_'tl ~ v t 0~L t~y•fZti +j~-V,~ yt1
od106 Coz I t Sq~ SO•bbs ~~,r at b
b •G
F.. ~J ~G a ZQ81• Qb.GZI
i
t
T
~ TI L
9 9
t
4
lpfjo, cT w
SST E a
N
P•G.
e~'~p pertYl~ 3619
13`x' MA a`ch'tQ of
.N! trssss~W aa~~
V Ic~s r Vka
Os~ 7
101 F- 50 su"-X,966W
i-,.
r
i 1 -r'
.1_I . _
f
t v 1'
n
} , e
u~.ti
r
Q ~
~_w rv ,
..,-s„„:~- sf .::.`~"II^'W.. v...h:-..:w~`:'u LA~ii~,+,.'^w';;. rih^n c,~~a"~,,,
-
;rr~I I(1 ill1.Il~Mrrn ~n(~-~ j(111i _ - ~
lil 1I1 B`I I I I'I I ? ~I ipl yr t~i t~! III I~t_- ~t~rtjrpti~l(I~I~it(lii t r)I t. t(~i Iljsflt~rli)ni tjtli r ~I t 1 1~1 I ! T~,III II'llllf IIII111 111 111 1(! Ipf III III 11! tp - r
C I ~ P 1 I I I ~i~(~ls
NOTE: IF THIS NICROFIIMEO ~I. ~ Z 3 4 _ 5 . 6 _ _ . 7 8 9 ~ i 1 I ,
oRawlrlc Is LESS C1EAR THAN
THIS NOTICE, LT IS DOE TO ~ ~ .
; ~ THE QIfALITY OF T}E ORIGINAL ~ I _
oRafu+c. _ _ _ ,
OE 6Z BZ dZ 8Z SZ bZ EZ ZZ iZ OZ bl BI LI 91 Sr bl EI Zi II OI 8 8 d 9 5 b E Z ~ d
1fu unblu uu6w
Iuuhul~NnlNSel1__ ~ I
HII
~ ~ .I -
,
~
_ e
~
_ ~
~Si
,r,.
A
f
F t.
ii
/ 7w
t
f
x} V 0
I 2:
ro
n
{
I i
{
I
r I
I
i i
i
ii
' I
S. flfl RE
SUMMARY
UNIT TYPE N0. S0. FT.
A 1Bp 1BA 40 150 ~
B 2BP 2BA 44 7030 SITE PLAN I~~ III
C 28p 28A 22 7095
TOTAL UNITS 770
p !S 60 7G0
TOTAL PARKING 796 SPACES
mt~me. o c
wo~.~.mawm'e`m~u:~
~r ~ 4 _ _ ~
y^, •1~1 ~ 1 111 ! 1 I I 111...
I p r`~T{i I{1 1p IIl tII ql III e117p,1p 1ll~glT jijl i{t~lli 1~ r{tOtj_ I~i~lsl Ii~~l t11fl~Iljlp{I q ~ pill 011 I ~ I I I ~ I I1 ~1111111IIIIIg1Igr~ry7{III ~ r
I !
i' 2 3 4 5 6. 7 8 8 4 it __,._-,-,}2 .
NDiE; IF THIS NICROFIINED ~ iwsxm.+~ '
DRANING IS IESS CLEAR THAN ~ .
THIS NOTICES IT 15 DUE 1b :
THE QUALITY OF 7FE ORIGINAL i _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - ' ~ F
DE 6Z 9Z LZ 9Z SZ 4Z £Z ZZ {Z OZ 61 BI^LI 91 Sr ~til EI ZI II Ol 6 B L 9 S > E Z I'""'
~IICnnInuINHINI1~uuRxiNnllau~nJ{q{
:a i ~ ' ;
I,,
I . i ~ Yl fb' ~4
I
_
non
r
"~----..-.rte..-._- ~ ~ _W_~
_
-
s
~ -
BUILDING TYPE 1 SIDE ELEYATiON
i
i
i
q
I
f~
i ~
i~-~Y i}s.
i
I
4
BUILDING TYPE I FRONT ELEVATION
ucnnais. o.c
; ~ w
. T._...
msa
-C'^~..-' ~~r-~.C- -,x*s 'rt'~,*.m~amr+a m- ~~'riy aa~R~ -n.'s..;
fi(Ii~~~~11~I~I~iIggl~Tl~~l~ ~I~~ilt~~~~jtR I~I~~t~ Tm ipljilrlli(f( 1Itti-- ,li tp rj ~i i!' ~4r 'il tU ifi ILL qT II Ifl Iii ~ I I ~ ~ I I ~ I L t I I t I I ~ t i I
F ~ ~I~{m I t ~ ~i 1 I ~ ~ I ! f 1 ~.I-') E ~Ilt t~~~iEe I~t~t~i _
NOTE; IF THIS HICROFItMEO I
oRAwu~ Is Less CLEAR THAN _ - 6 - . 7 8 9 0 ! I
THIS NOTI(F, R IS DUE TD ~ -
TIE QUALITY Of 71E ORIGINALI
F
DRNVING. ~*c--_
OE 6Z 8Z LIIZ 9Z SZ ♦Z Et ZZ tZ 08 6t B! Li 91 5tT 41 EI ZI' Il 01 6 8 ! 9 5 4 e.- Z I~+ j a
~aIIGNIi s
All uulun au6m lOLi1LIJi._
~ i y
g -I w;~ - i
I,: ~t i I - T ~
1-----~---..m ~ r,
_ - _ _ _ v ~ l~ I
-
. ~.1~
~ i
_
'k.
.yD~r a~
1 _
'!"f
a+
_ ~ g.
a
sUIL01NG TYPE I, 11 S:DE ELEVATlflR
a r
a '
xr h'
i t ~
t" Y~ ,
i
II ~
i ' i I
i
~ BUILDING TYPE II FpONT ELEVATION
I
i
arcllitacll. 9_c
.k"..• v-._--s,.cr ..°*Y'XAT'r-.v..x"' ~4 «~eV~". i:::iC~AFw$' '^~'m~',~y~... _ ,,...~y,.4.wwMy~.~ - -
w,
~y*..~.. ~ •r-^'~-.`.'.'h.`af. w"3v=rRw _ ,y°. .``.u G°,:]:~J:a~: r
~~r.-rpt I ~ }p t t t ~ r ~'I t t I 1 I I I I f e ~i< T Rt Rl t{s IY i II qI q tp p~ it Ijl )jr }s t;t t{t I{I tp ~~t ryI tp I{I r t I: qt tit ttt op ryt qi apt
~ tl~ r~,;I.~r t{n~r~1 I1.(tiT~(1 ~ ~.~~T~ -1..?~ f I ~t~ t ~ t) ~ ~.1 ~ ! ~ ~i ai ! i ~ ~ t !
1 f i 1
2 3 4 5 6-. 7 8 _ 9 0
NJTE: CF THIS MICRGFILEIED `~""`Oi ' ~ ^
DRltlVING IS LESS CLEAR 1HAN I -
7NIS NDTICE IT 1S DIE TO-
ZGINAL '
TF£ LITY OF TI£ DR _ _
_ _ _ ~ F
QDA ' 'I _ _
_ -
oRwvlrO. ''08-BZ 82 "LZ SZ SZyb2 £Z Zz IZ 02 81 ®i 11 91 YSI~~it EI Zt 01 6 8 L 9 S b 6 2 I
F I
S'
. ~ 'EMIIIIRSIIII~IIIIrilll~ltllllMlNgf4tl~i _ _
~a - ,
~ ~ ~I - - ~
,art
f ~4_ ry - Tr"'°°'~
e~
a-- ~
.
'r
UNIT C
j f i
I If
I
~ _ O r
j 1i ~ ~ 1 ~
~ p><le I i
aka
~ I ~
I
e 1 ren►7
0 IIG
r~ `
(~s~r 0 I
~ r~yoa•1 iitl`+{4 i I''•K 1~ I
i ❑ tq~ ~
Q
UNIT B UNIT A
ucbilecte. Vc.
n.
. ~ ~ _ .
J 1 8 J I ! t t I I ! f I 1 1 ~ ~ r, . ~ a"e~c.~~ _ t
L
. 1111II1IIli1to~0~I~~111~a1111111Rt m~li►111 J11 711~(!1.11I1~f( frIIIIIC.'(Ilallf)11T1Id1111III611 iIlI1IIt1I~F , .
t ~ ~ } ~ I _~~~~1 .t_._~ P 1 ~f ~ {t~alt~ IlO.li I! VIII ~~n~lla IJl~ila.l
I I
Nore: IF THISMICImFtlrffo 2 3 4 5 6._ 7 B _ 8 0 _11_.._..._.12
' DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR 1HAN ~
- THIS lY7TICE, R IS OIIE TO
1FEi QUALITY OF 1FE ORIGINAL i
as az pz cz aIz sz ~ rz -~ez zz tz oa -s~ ei ~i 91 S'I~~ bl EI 21 - I I o! 6 p- ~ _ 9 _5 _ .6 ~ I~ ;
iMIC1111II1L1~N11~1111~IN1~~1 &
1 t1"I`1'~,~r
• i 4,' d• ~
_ ~
1 ~ C.:d
~
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Ed Murphy, Community Development December 19, 1989
Director
FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recbrder
SUBJECT: Mobile Home Issue - Cook Lane
I received a telephone call today from Mrs. James McGriff, 10735 S.W. Park
Street, Tigard, Oregon (phone no. 620-7528).
She advised she was in receipt of a note written by one of her neighbors
concerning the mobile home located on Cook Lane and the fact that Council
would be discussing the subject on December 20. She advised she would
be unable to attend the meeting; however, wanted to voice her concern
over the mobile home issue. She opposed having the mobile home in her neighbor-
hood and was fearful that several more mobile homes might be placed on
vacant lots in the area.
Mrs. McGriff noted her objection to her neighborhood being described as
"unkept" during recent city meetings. (She advised she was told this was
said during testimony - she was not present at the meeting where this was
to have occurred.)
cw
\ CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
FINAL ORDER NO. 89- PC
A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WHICH UPHOLDS A DIRECTOR'S
INTERPRETATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE THAT WAS APPEALED TO THE
COMMISSION BY NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION NO. 3 (FILE NO. M 89-20).
WHEREAS, an application for a building permit was submitted on April 13, 1989
to place a residence at 10676 S.W. Cook Lane and the permit was subsequently
approved by the Building Division; and
WHEREAS, nearby neighbors and Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) No. 3
filed objections to the approval of the building permit on the grounds that the
residence is a mobile home which is not permitted on an individual lot in the
R-3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units/acre) zone; and
WHEREAS, the Director issued an interpretation that the residence was a
manufactured home as defined by the Community Development Code and it was a
permitted use on an individual lot in the R- 3.5 zone; and
WHEREAS, NPO No. 3 appealed the Director's interpretation of the Code to the
Planning Commission and the Commission reviewed the case at a public hearing on
December 5, 1989.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONCLUDES THAT:
Section 1: The residence located at 10676 S.W. Cook Lane is a manufactured
home as defined in Section 18.42.020 A. 10. of the Community
Development Code.
Section 2: The subject property is zoned R-3.5 and manufactured homes are
listed in Section 18.48.030 A. 5. of the Code as a permitted use.
Section 3. The residence satisfies the applicable criteria listed in Section
18.94.040 A. of the Code which pertain to siting manufactured homes
on individual lots.
Section 4. There are some differences in construction of the residence which
are different from standard Uniform Building Code (UBC)
construction. However, the UBC allows the use of "alternative
methods of construction" provided it can be verified that the
modification will perform as well as or better than the
corresponding UBC standard. In this case, the verification of
equivalent performance has been provided by the Department of
Housing and Urban Development, which inspected the residence at the
factory.
Section 5: The Planning Commission, therefore orders that the above referenced
appeal be denied and the Director's interpretation (Case No. M 89-
20) be upheld. It is further ordered that the appellant (NPO 3.)
FINAL ORDER NO. 89- PC - M 89-20 - PAGE 1
and the owner of the residence be notified of the entry of this
order.
i
PASSED: This day of December, 1989, by the Planning
Commission of the City of Tigard.
Milton Fyre, Vice-president
Tigard Planning Commission
M89-20/kl
FINAL ORDER NO. 89- PC - M 89-20 - PAGE 2 r
5
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: November 6, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: October 27, 1989
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Zone Ordinanc PREVIOUS ACTION:Plannin Commission
Amendment ZOA 89-03 hearing on 10/17/89
PREPARED BY: Deborah Stuart
DEPT HEAD O CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
P LICY ISSUE
Should the Tigard Comprehensive pla , volume 3, the Community Development Code
be amended to incorporate recently adopted state law pertaining to non-point
source pollution caused by new development?
INFORMATION SUMMARY
In late July, the state Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) adopted new
regulations pertaining to non-point source pollution caused by new development.
The new regulations apply to construction projects in the Tualatin River Basin
for which an application is submitted after January 1, 1990. The City is
required to adopt these regulations. The Planning Commission considered these
amendments (ZOA 89-03) at their regular meeting on October 17, 1989.
i
The EQC is also considering potential rules which would put additional f
requirements on new developments, including a requirement for permanent storm f
water treatment for some developments. These rules will likely be considered in I
November by the EQC and may later be adopted by the City. The present rules can
be found in OAR 340-41-455(3).
Attached are the proposed changes ("Exhibit A") to Community Development Code
Chapter 18.90, Environmental Performance Standards; an ordinance adopting the
amendment; and a copy of the state regulations (attachment B). New proposed
wording is indicated by underlines. No wording is proposed to be deleted from
this chapter.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Adopt the proposed amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission.
2. Modify the proposed amendment.
3. Deny the proposed amendment.
FISCAL IMPACT
These regulations affect the cost of development, as well as the costs of
maintaining public streets and storm water facilities.
SUGGESTED ACTION
1. Adopt the proposed amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission.
is
r., P
C~
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: November 6, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing, PREVIOUS ACTION:
Pacific Corporate Center LID
Boundar Ame nt /I JAI PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
Shall Ordinance No. 89-14 creating the Pacific Corporate Center Local
Improvement District be amended to correct the legal description of the
District boundaries?
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The consultants on the Pacific Corporate Center LID project have discovered an
error in the legal description of the boundaries of the LID. The legal
description as written includes a small amount of land outside of the intended
LID boundary. It is proposed to amend the boundary description to reduce the
width of the northerly 475 feet of the District immediately south of Bonita
Road from 87.5 to 72.5 feet. This amendment will correct the description to
conform with the right-of-way which has actually been acquired from John Smets.
{ The Attorneys have recommended that this amendment be adopted in order to make
it clear that the Smets property is not to be assessed under the LID.
A public hearing is required in order to amend the LID formation ordinance.
Notices of the public hearing have been mailed to property owners and published
in the Tigard Times.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Adopt the attached ordinance amending the LID boundaries.
2. Take no action, allowing the boundaries to remain as described in the
original ordinance.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends adoption of the attached ordinance.
dj/SS-PHPCC.RW