Loading...
City Council Packet - 09/25/1989 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item should sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, SEPTEMBER 25, 1989, 6:30 PM ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the TIGARD CIVIC CENTER beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's E: 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD agenda items are asked to be two minutes or TIGARD, OREGON 97223 less. Longer matters can be set for a future agenda by contacting either the mayor or the City Administrator. i, 6:30 o STUDY SESSION - Study Meeting with Park Board 7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. VISI'TOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or less Per Issue, Please) 3. CONSENT AGENDA: 7niese items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Authorize Inter-Fund Loans - Resolution No. 89--Lq_ 3.2 Authorize Appointment of City Recorder - Resolution No. 89- 3.3 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) Meeting: Award Bid for 104th Hillview Storm Drain; Adjourn LCRB; Reconvene Council Meeting 4. CONSIDERATION OF CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN BALIA'T' T1= - RESOLUTION NO. 89- -1)Z o Cmmv mity Development Staff 5. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 6. EXhOL7lIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and. pending litigation issues. 7. ADJOURN cca925 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL f FEU M MINUTES - SEP1IRRII2 25, 1989 - 6:30 P.M. 1. ILL CALL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon (arrived at 7:00 p.m.), Valerie Johnson, and John Schwartz. City Staff Present: Wayne Lowry, Finance Director (present for study session only); Ed Mrphy, Cammuzity Development Director; Liz Newton, Senior Planner; Tim Ramis, City Attorney; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer (arrived at 7:10 p.m.)., a' 2. STUDY SPSSICK: E a. Park Board present: Chairman Steve. Slabaugh; Board Members Jeff Hepler, Bud Hillman, and Sheldon c.colar. Council and the Park Board reviewed the election results of the September 19, 1989 Special Election. I Discussion followed on the future prioritization of the projects for the Park Board. With regard to the favorable outcome of the election, it was noted that staff would prioritize and set a schedule for implementation and funding of projects. Once c mpleted, this work would be submitted to the Park Board for their analysis and input before it was submitted to the Council their review and implementation. Financing of projects was ~y discussed. It was noted that assessments would not be received by j the City until November of 1990. In order to begin projects before then, the City would have to borrow funds in advance. Other topics of discussion included the following: ' o Land Acquisition. } Chairman Slabaugh noted that people were concerned that dollars were not being set aside for new parks (i.e., Bull Mountain area). He said that the City needed to identify areas in need and possible ways of raising dollars for land acquisition. Several ideas ware discussed for funding which included: - increasing Systems Development Charges - explore grant opportunities - potential land donations E - another levy proposal to voters for land acquisition - require land dedications from developers Councilor Johnson said potential maintenance costs for newly acquired parks must be reviewed in detail. I CITY COUNCIL M[ WM - SEPTEIBER 25, 1989 - PAGE 1 now t i o Recreation Program. AMIL Chairman Slabaugh rioted that the Park Board may want to activate a recreation program. Discussion followed. Councilor Eadon noted the Library had implemented a "seed i recreation program" which was being monitored to determine levels of usage and success. Council may want to fund additional money next budget year; however, she did not feel the program would be increased extensively for at least another one or two years. A regionalized recreation-program approach was discussed. This may include working with Tualatin for jointly sponsored recreational activities. Board member Hepler advised he felt there was a need for adult recreation in Tigard and said that the City should at least begin studying the issue. Councilor Johnson noted she had not received a great deal of comment from Tigard citizens about recreation concerns. Councilor Eadon pointed out that there was a shortage of facilities for recreational use. There was discussion on the fact that school facilities were used extensively for adult k recreation. k r• Service district formation was discussed as a possibility for _ recreational programs. Cost concerns were noted. r (Randy wooley arrived at 7:12 p.m.) Chairman Slabaugh noted that all programs and issues would be continuously reviewed to assure that the city was ready with a new plan when the park levy expires in five years. He advised that the Park Board would also continue to oversee the capital improvement projects identified in the regular City budget. o Alternative Funding Councilor Eadon advised that the council had met with Representative Tom Brian earlier this month. Representative Brian advised that marine funds were available for waterfront developgnent of boat ramps, retaining walls, and moorage improvements. Staff was working on submitting a request for funds to be used for Cook park improvements along the Tualatin River. City council thanked the Park Board for their attendance and congratulated them on the successful election. CITY COUNCIL NBNuTEs - SEPrEMER 25, 1989 - PAGE 2 b. City Center discussion: In response to a question from Councilor Johnson on the content of the wording of the proposed ballot measure, City attorney advised that portions of the development plan could be implemented through alternative funding (other than tax increment financing) should the ballot measure fail. Council consensus was to hold Town Hall meetings for the City Center development plan on October 10 and 11, at Twality and Fowler Junior High. C. Durham Road Construction: Councilor Johnson asked about dust problems as a result of construction on Durham Road. City Engineer advised he had visited with city inspectors this morning; the contractor was to be informed that dust control measures were to be implemented. 3. AGENDA RE<TIFN: a. 3. 1, Authorize Interfund Loans Resolution. Mayor Edwards noted a correction to the resolution in the wording in the title and in Sections 1A and 1B of the Resolution: Where it reads "Local Improvement District CIP," the wording should be changed to read "Local Improvement District Debt Service Fund." b. Mayor Edwards noted that representatives from. NPO #3 may be present during the Visitor's Agenda to request a fee waiver for an appeal of the Director's Decision on the Hudson property. 4. VISTTCHtS AGENDA: o Herman Porter, Chairman for NPO #3, 11875 SW Gaarde, Tigard, OR 97224, requested a waiver of fee for the NPO's appeal of the development conditions on the Hudson property. (Appeal of Director's decision SDR 89-20 and V 89-26). (See Tigard Municipal Code, Section 18.23.345). Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to waive the appeal fee as requested by NPO #3. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. o Jahn Moore, Vice President, WTM Development, 15800 SW Boones Ferry Road, Suite C301, Lake Oswego, OR 97035, advised that he was the developer of the property which was the subject of the appeal noted above. CITY COUNCIL MD&MM - SELF MMER 25, 1989 - PAGE 3 Mr. Moore expressed concern that the appeal be limited to those points which were brougdit out by the NPO in their formal appeal. He advised that his company would work hard to come to an understanding with the neighborhood to address the appeal issues. 5. CX2aMWB' AGUM-. 5.1 Authorize Interfund Loans - Resolution No. 89-74. 5.2 Authorize Appointment of City Recorder - Resolution No. 89-75. 5.3 Recess Council Meeting; Comene Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) Meeting: Award Bid for 104th Hillview Storm Drain; Adjourn LCRB; Reconvene Council meting. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of council present. Recess Council Meeting Local Contract Review Board members present: Present were President Jerry Edwards; Board members Carolyn Eadon, Valerie Johnson, and John Schwartz. Motion by Board member Johnson, seconded by Board member Schwartz, to approve Consent Agenda item .3 as submitted. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of the LCRB present. Reconvene Council Meeting 6. CN OF C1TY C NF12R DEVELCEMENI! PLAIT BATYDr 4TffE: a. RESOIUrION NO. 89-76. A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL CAUM4G FOR A SPECIAL EUXTION TO SUBMIT TO THE RBGISrERED, QUALIFIED vaIERS OF THE CITY THE CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND 'I'fH•; AU'T'HORITY TO USE TAX INCREMIT FINANCItr. AS A METHOD OF FUNDING ACTIVITIES SEr FORTH IN THE PLAN. Councilor Johnson briefly reviewed the process to date. She noted the November 7 election was the culmination of three years of review and work by the City Cmicil and many citizens for the revitalization of downtown. Mayor Edwards advised that several more educational sessions would be held. Upcoming events included two Town Hall meetings, an educational workshop, and a pancake breakfast. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to adopt Resolution No. 89-76. Zhe motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEHBE2 25, 1989 - PAGE 4 7. I-AfA I'i'H+S: Park Levy - Councilor Eadon noted that the park levy passed at the September 19, 1989, Special Election. She advised that the Park Board was very encouraged by the support shoran in the cmmiLmity. Staff, the Board, and City Council would begin prioritizing the implementation schedule for the funded projects. 7. EIIDGUJ VE SEmIaff - Cancelled. 8. AD30ORNMENr: 7:51 p.m. Approved by the Tigard City Council on /VU V Q P7i &r (O , 1989. City Recorder - City of Tigard ATTEST: y , City of Tigard cp/CWCM925 H: \WORD\CrYl=\ CITY COUNCIL Mn TPES - SEPTEMBER 25, 1989 - PAGE 5 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice 7-6368 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising JR~F-$VED City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice SEp 2 519a9 P. 0. Box 23397 • • Tigard, OR 97223 13 Duplicate Affidavit riv PO No. B05692 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )'S- 1, Dortha Marty being first duly sworn, depose and say at I a5 ty. Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the lgar imes a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Ti~'ard in the afor paid co my and Taft,; th t, the 8lty G~ounci. ee ing Agenda 9-22-89 a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and consecutive in the following issues: September 21, 1989 Subscribed and sworn t before me this 22nd of September, 1989 Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Aires: 6/9/93 AFFIDAVIT ! ` ~ ~+a w` ~ f 1. IaI r 'L r' <,y 4 `b a`. ~ max- x ^wyq- p 9 xI Cl~osViligr elected agenda items areiiblisled forydur uff ' ii~farm ao41=" wd U1,2 ►d~as~m y e` ~obtaia'e 4ad$f o't , ? R. erA,y13V5 ati Bo ' evi'm a" W f 'X, +Y•t,'._ i ..yr .a. ~s.~aay'± .~a.~'tTtr+ 'i`~-""" fIq. ,ybRb~ CC~UNCIf:'1tm 11111 ~7 k go M. " I~~;;yy~IT.BI~ :rus iTlx + GG AGENDA LTEM It - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City f Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. i F j P NAME b ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED E e. r 'Tease ~i n-~ k F {i F f f4 L ft F f 9 t. f P F F i i COUNCIL MEETING - STUDY SESSION AGENDA SEPTEMBER 25, 1989 i k PARKS BOARD CELEBRATION k 4 F WHAT NEXT? BRAINSTORMING WITH PARKS BOARD MEMBERS ti st i CITY CENTER° RECEIVE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REVIEW BROCHURE REVIEW SCHEDULING DECIDE ON TOWN HALLS - SHOULD THEY BE HELD ON OCTOBER 10 (AT TWALITY) AND OCTOBER 11 (AT FOWLER)? G. f'. CALENDAR ITEMS' ATTENDANCE AT LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES CONFERENCE IN NOVEMBER (QUORUM CHECK FOR 11/27 MEETING) OPTION: CANCEL 11/27 AND HOLD MEETING ON 11/6 IN ORDER TO HAVE 3 MEETINGS IN NOVEMBER CHECK CALENDARS: MOVE LAKE OSWEGO COUNCIL MEETING TO 10/24 (WAS 10/10) AGENDA REVIEW VISITOR'S AGENDA - NPO 3 - REQUEST OF WAIVER OF APPEAL FEE, FOR HUDSON STATION DIRECTOR'S DECISION FTO BE APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONSENT AGENDA REVIEW BALLOT TITLE REVIEW Y F 18.32.330 Transcripts A. Within 20 days after the filing of the notice of review, the City shall provide each Council member, the applicant and the neighborhood planning organization (if requested), a copy of the complete transcript of the hearing and a copy of the minutes. B. The appellant shall be responsible to satisfy all costs incurred for preparation of the transcript at a rate of actual costs up to $500 and one-half costs for any amount incurred over $500. Payment shall be made in full at least five days prior to the hearing. C. Any other party requesting a copy of the transcript shall be charged the actual copy costs. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 84-69; Ord. 84-09; Ord. . 83-52) 18.32.340 Notice of Appeal or Petition for Review A. The notice of appeal or petition for review shall contain: 1. A reference to the application sought to be appealed or reviewed; 2. A statement as to how the petitioner qualifies as a party; 3. The specific grounds for the appeal or review; and 4. The date of the filing of the final decision on the action or, in the case of a decision by the Director, the date the decision was filed and the date notice of the final or proposed decision was given. B. The appeal or review application shall be accompanied by the required fee except as allowed under Section 18.32.345. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 85-45; Ord. 83-52) 18.32.345 Fee Waiver Allowed for Neighborhood Planning Organizations A. Fees for land use applications and applications for appeal or review of a land use decision shall be waived for applications filed by a neighborhood planning organization (NPO) if all of the following conditions are met: j 1. The appeal or land use application must have been supported by a majority vote of NPO members at a public meeting where a quorum of NPO members was present; 2. A copy of the minutes of the NPO meeting where the appeal or land use application was initiated must be submitted with the appeal or land use application; C Revised 02/27/89 Page 73 3. The appeal or application will be considered valid when conditions (1) and (2) of this section are met and all other filing requirements are met; and i 4. The NPO chairperson or designated representative shall appear ` i at the next available City Council meeting after the application or appeal is filed. The NPO shall work through the Planning Division to schedule the item on a Council agenda. Should the Council deny the NPO request for a fee waiver, the NPO shall submit the required fee within three working days of the denial. The fee shall be filed by three p.m. on the third F day. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 85-45) 18.32.350 Persons Entitled to Notice on Appeal or Review: Type of Notice A. Upon appeal or review, notice shall be given to parties entitled to notice under Sections 18.32.130 and 18.32.290. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 84-71; Ord. a4-61; Ord. 83-52) t 18.32.360 Contents of Notice on Appeal or Review 't A. Notice shall include those matters provided by Section 18.32.140. i. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.32.370 Action on Appeal or Review: Time Limit and Authority to Change the Decision A. The approval authority shall affirm, reverse, or modify the decision which is the subject of the appeal; however, the decision shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.32.250; or.: B. Upon the written consent of all parties to extend the 120-day limit, the approval authority may remand the matter if it is satisfied that 4 testimony or other evidence could not have been presented or was not available at the time of the hearing. In deciding to remand the matter, the approval authority shall consider and make findings and conclusions regarding: t4t' 1. The prejudice to parties; f' 2. The convenience or availability of evidence at the time of the initial hearing; E. E3. The surprise to opposing parties; I f 4. The date notice was given to other parties as to an attempt to admit; or 5. The competency, relevancy and materiality of the proposed testimony or other evidence. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 84-61; Ord. 83-52) j i Revised 02/27/89 Page 74 i' MINUTE OF REGULAR MEETING OF NPO # 3 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 TOWN HALL CONFERENCE ROOM - TIGARD CIVIC CENTER 1. called to order at 7:06 PM by Chairman Porter 2. Roll Call Present: Porter, Bledsoe, Froude; and Hansen. Absent: Klingele (excused), Mortensen, Hooker, and Smith (see item 8 regarding'Smith•s membership). Staff: Senior Planner Liden Guest: Per attached sign-up sheet 3. The new Police Chief, Ron Goodpaster, introduced himself to the people in NPO # 1 and NPO # 3. He offered statistical help in considering any problem areas. He also asked us to call him if we need help in the neighborhood. 4. Minutes from August 2, 1989, were approved. 5. SDR 89-20/V 89-26 WTM Development Co., 13702 and 13735 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD tax lots 400 and 500), the old Hudson Station. Discussion of this development continued from last meeting. John Moore with WTM Development Co. had met with a selected group of residents, and in response had offered to the City a modified plan of development. Modifications included curving the exit on Watkins Street so that traffic would be forced to turn right toward Pacific Highway; also the internal traffic pattern made the approach to Watkins not a thoroughfare as was previously. The water detention system was modified so that there would be no standing water except in a flood situation caused by an intense and/or prolonged downpour. A resident Dave Hammes diagrammed the detention facility. Again John Moore represented WTM Development Co. There was considerable discussion, with residents objecting primarily to the. traffic access to Watkins Street. Dave Hammes suggested signing the exist for "right turn only", and marking entrance as "entrance only", so that police could enforce these policies. The NPO made that a motion by majority (3-0). Bev Froude made a motion that the NPO recommend the City investigate continued usage of 2 or 3 accesses to Pacific Highway, and the NPO approved her motion my majority (2-0). John Moore asked the NPO attitude toward the proposed variance. By unanimous motion the NPO approves the variance, provided that screening is provided as proposed. Bob Bledsoe commented that the residents were being unreasonable in their opposition to the development in failing to recognize and appreciate the compromises being made by WTM Development Co. He made a motion that the NPO recommend approval as submitted; the motion failed (1-2). Herm Porter I i f ( made a motion to recommend approval with the exception of access to Watkins. Dennis Moonier commented that not having access to Watkins, but instead multiple accesses on Pacific Highway near Watkins, might make traffic in and out of Watkins difficult. Herm Porter withdrew his motion. one resident suggested retaining an attorney for the NPO. The chairman explained that such would not be appropriate for the NPO, but the residents have that option. 6. Manufactured Home on Cook Lane Dennis Monnier stated he had received a letter August 29 which addressed half of. his questions. The building seems to meet the UGB Code except insulation and plumbing. But when it comes to the foundation, it seems the City staff no longer referenced the UGB but Department of Commerce standards. There was much discussion of State and City laws and standards for mobile or manufactured homes. The motion was made for NPO # 3 to appeal the permits for this manufactured home. The motion passed unanimously (4-0). Further, the acting secretary, Bob Bledsoe, said he would poll those members not in attendance. (The result of the poll is that Klingele and Hook will support and vote for the appeal, but Mortensen needed more information, particularly what is underneath the structure.) The motion was also passed unanimously (4-0) to ask City Council to take up the approval of these permits for its own review, on its own initiative. NPO # 3 unanimously recommends that the provision allowing placement of manufactured homes in any residential area be repealed. There should be some restrictions such as conditional use, or specially designated area as FF suggested by the recent State law. t E k 7 7. M 89-17 - NPO # 3 offers no comment on this proposal. j 8. Other Business In discussion with all present, it was noted that several residents have j applied for membership in the NPO, but no recent appointments have been t made by Council (except Bev Froude). The NPO unanimously request Council to make several appointments. Also Mike Smith has had very little attendance recently. The NPO agreed unanimously to have the Chairman contact Mike Smith, and ask for either his resignation, or his active participation. 9. Adjournment at about 9:30 PM Respectfully Submitted j f i I Bob Bledsoe, Acting Secretary NPO # 3 1 dj/MIN-NP03 NPO #3 Meeting Minutes Minutes for NPO #3 August 2, 1989 ?:00 p.m. Town Hall City of Tigard j i ~--,ere was not a quorum in attendance. Meeting called to order by Herm Porter. Attending, Porter, Bledsoe, Froude, Hansen; excused 'Mortensen r Minutes from previous meeting approve.. I ; Item 4a added to agenda. WTIM Development Co., John Rloore to give presentation f on development plans on property formerly Hudson gasoline station Hwy. 99 at SW «atkins. ~ s Keith Lid.en, senior planner City of Tigard, brought the city code require- ments revised 2/2?/89 on definitions of mobile home and :manufactured home. "riobile home refers to a structure transportable in one or more sections, each built on a permanent chassis and which is designed to be used for permanent occupancy as a residential dwelling." (Inspection and approval given with a HuD seal of approval.) ;manufactured home "refers to a factory fabricated transportable building which meetsthe Uniform Building Code which is incorporated vA th similar structures or units at a building site and used as a dwelling unit." Keith stated the house on S,,i Cook Lane meets code with regard to 2x6 studs, wood siding and peaked roof. The City has received petitions from neighbors and the City attorney is reviewing the entire issue to see if the permit was issued in error. A decision will be made by August 8, 1989. If the C rmit was issued incorrectly the structure may have to be modified or moved. If the permit was issued appropriately the structure could stay. There was a discussion with the audience, the NPU members and Keith Liden about the differences in mobile versus modular homes. Mobile homes are put on axels and transported; modular homes are brought in in pieces and lifted off in pieces, it is not transported on an axel already assembled. A member of the audience stated that the home on Cook Lane had a HUD seal of approval, which is only put on the mobile home not modular home. A question was asked about the foundation of the home about whether or not itmet the Uniform Building Code standards. This was not answered. Another question of hoar this type of building fits in an already established neighborhood was raised. Keith stated the Code addresses design standards to be met by manufactured homes. The his Cory of manufactured homes in Tigard is that in 1982-1983 manufactured homes.were not allowed by zoning in single family zoned areas. This was changed in 1984 after the comprehensive plan revision in 1983. Currently only manufactured homes are allowed in single family residential areas. Mobile homes are not allowed. Mr. John Moore of WTAS Development and Mr. Gregg Weston of Kampe & Assoc. Engineers, showed the preliminary site plan for the proposed commercial development at SW Watkins St. & Henry. 99 (formerly Hudson gasoline property). The plan calls for 2 buildings of 22,275' total. Building A nearest to Hwy. 99 will be all retail businesses. Bldg. B on western portion of the 7 operty will be automotive associated businesses only. The buildings mil be 20' in height. The western portion abuts residential property and a 10' setback is required. The developer proposedto the City a 5' ` setback, but the building actually will be no closer than 20' from the property line. There will be a 6-8' cyclone fence and a block wall with plantings toward the outside (probably 10' arborvitae). Page 2 Aug 2,1989 There will be an onsite detention system which meters the flow of water into existing storm water system north on Watkins at a constant rate. The detention pond will be a rocked depression in the northeast corner to catch wq r to be metered out. There will be grading on the site so the runoff wi--L not inundate downstream properties. There are two entrances proposed, one on Hwy. 99 and one on S,, viatkins. Half street improvements paid for by the developer will be done on t'°atkir_s. Trees on the development on north side of Watkins will be removed and replaced with low bushes or grass to help visability.. The half street improvements will be 17' from center line to curb and the intersection will be 34' wide. New storm drain pipe will be installed at the intersection. The sewer hookup will be connected with the development acros3 Watkins. Questions from the audience were addressed. Hours willbe 9-6, closed Sunday. Garbage collection located on back of building, residents concerned about pickup times. The whole question of transportation circulation is a very big concern to residents in the neighborhood. Traffic turning left from Watkins onto Pacific Highway travelling north. This is a bad intersection for this traffic pattern. Concern from the residents that traffic will increase substantially because customers will exit on Watkins and travel north on Watkins to SW Park or Vlalnut where intersection entrances are more favorable. The developer proposed a 12 month period of time to see if the traffic pattern works and then re-evaluate. A concern fromthe the neighborhood that traffic will increase through Walnut, ,Vatkins, Park, 110th, Fairhaven to go to the shopping center. The developer is not opposed tolooking at alternatives. There was concern about noise, airconditioning units, etc., there will be none. Air compressors will be inside of the building. There w~ be security lights on until 1:00 a.m. A committee of 3 people from the neighborhood together with the developer and engineer will meet to discuss the plans. 'The developer plans to submit plans to City of Tigard on August 10, 1989. The community can send letters to the City with comments about the plan. The City will make their recommendation in about 4-6 weeks and the decision can be appealed to the City Council. The Taira-Klaus/Daniel proposal for annexation was discussed. It was noted that Mr. Daniel was no longer involved in the operation. This 40 acres of land located at the southern terminus of SW 135th off -Walnut is going before the Boundary Commission for annexation to the City of Tigard on August 24, 1989. The plan is very preliminary and will be submitted to the City of Tigard in September. The owners 'were represented by Mr. Dale Addington and his wife who stated the attorney is Mr. Marvin Bowen. Some NPO suggestions were the extension of SW 115th should have a more westerly location in relation to the Bull Mountain Transportation Plan. It was suggested not so many cuts and fills as on Benchview EGtates. It was suggested that the transportation system be designed to slow the traffic down not as a major throughway. It was suggested that there be open spaces dedicated to the public. Density is an issue of great concern. There is large lot development adjacent to this property. Storage of boats and motor vehicles should be prohibited. 14r. Addington said there would be restrictions covering this. would 135th be full street improvements fru Walnut south? ~ M-89-13 Mueller there was no objection to this request to adjust two parcels in Benchview Estates, lots 17 and 18. Agenda item next meeting will be Hudson property. Ideeting adjourned. f- i I TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an ' REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item should sign on the appropriate OCTOBER 9, 1989, 6:30 PM sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ! TIGARD CIVIC CENTER ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's TIGARD, OREGON 97223 Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator. t 6:30 o STUDY SESSION t. Workshop Meeting - Economic Development CWmittee F 7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items. 2. PROC ANAMON - DISABILITY EMPLOYMENT AYWRE ESS MONTH - OCTOBER 1989 o Mayor Edwards 3. VIS17ORIS AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please) 4. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: u 4.1 Approve Council Minutes: August 21, and September 11, 1989 4.2 Receive and File: a. Council calendar b. Certified 9/19/89 Election Results 4.3 Notify State of Oregon of City of Tigard's Position on Video Poker Gambling - Resolution No. 89--1'1 4.4 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) Meeting: a) Award Bid for Janitorial Services; b) Award Bid for Crack Sealer. Adjourn LCRB; reconvene Coil meeting. 4.5 Approve Criteria for Evaluation of City Administrator 4.6 Call for Public Hearing and Receive Engineer's Report - 135th LID- Resolution No. 89--12> is 5. CONSIDERATION OF RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE - ORDINANCE NO. 89-Z5 o City Adak-dstration Staff 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard city council will go into Executive session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), (h) & (i) to discuss labor relations, real property transaction, current & pending litigation issues, and City Aftinistrator evaluation. 7. ADJOU ITT i cw.cca109 f t COUNCIL AGENDA - OCTOBER 9, 1989 - PAGE 1 i G: T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L 192MIU PEMUI!ES - OCICMt 9, 1989 - 6:30 FM 1. ROLL CML: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon (arrived at 7:20 p.m.), Valerie Johnson (arrived at 6:42 p.m.), Joe Kasten, and John Schwartz. City Staff Present: Patrick Reilly, City Administrator; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Ed Murphy, cam unity Development Director; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; Liz Newton, Senior Planner; John Acker, Assistant Planner; and Ron Goodpaster, Chief of Police. 2. STUDY SESSICK* a. Workshop meeting with the Economic Development Cc mnittee - Present for the Economic Development Committee: William A. Monahan - Chairperson; members Amo De Bernardi.s, Brian Moore, Paul Etchemendy, and ex-officio member Peggy Weston Byrd.. Chairman Monahan reviewed the Ambassador Program. He advised that he felt the Ambassador Program was a good one; however, there had not been a lot of interest on the part of business in the area for this. He noted that there was a lot of material available and that the Ambassadors are ready in case there is a call for information. He advised that the committee may need to do more outreach activities in order to let organizations ]mow that the Ambassador Program is available. He advised that the Economic Development Coamnittee has been looking at another phase of the Ambassador Program, and that would be to solicit information from people who are moving out of the cannunity. He advised that this has been started by the preparation of a questionnaire which asks for cents from these businesses who are leaving. He noted that the Economic Development Committee was interested in helping with the downtown redevelopment, triangle development, and periodic review. He asked how they could help the City Council. Ms. Weston Byrd advised that she was continuously handing out a lot of the material which was prepared by City staff to business people interested in the Tigard area. This material included population information, maps, Economic Development Committee contacts, lists outlining members of City Council, etc. (Councilor Johnson arrived at 6:42 p.m.) r G Mayor Edwards noted that he liked the activities where businesses are asked how things are going. He advised that he thought it was a good idea that the Eeonomi.c Development C%xmnittee solicit input information from those businesses who were leaving the area. 3 There was discussion on businesses in the City of Tigard and their perception of City staff and whether or not the staff was helpful and knowledgeable. Mayor outlined that it appeared that for the most part the perceptions were good. CX7UK3L MnKffi - OCIOBm 9, 1989 - PACE I Councilor Schwartz suggested that the Ambassador Program might be of help by asking businesses, after they have been in business for a few months, to look back at the process and report on how happy they were with their experience. Councilor Johnson noted that there are post cards available for members of the Economic Develcpnent Cwmittee to use when they make contact. After obtaining the name and address of the business, the post card should be mailed to John Acker at the City Hall. In this way, John Acker can get a message to these businesses on the services available. There was discussion on grand openings of businesses so that they could participate and welccm new businesses. There was discussion on further materials which could be available to help publicize the Ambassador Program. This included brochures left with real estate firms and visits to various service organizations. Mr. De Bernardis noted that visual guides were needed to show what was happening in Tigard. He noted that there was no display on the vision for the City Center. He noted that the lobby would be a fit area to place different displays so people could visually see what was harppeni g within the City. Mere were comments that items such as aerial photos, pin maps showing building activities, and different photographs of happenings within the City would be a good thing to have. (City Engineer Wooley arrived at 7:00 p.m.) Economic Develcpanent Committee asked for the council consensus if they would put together a format for decorating the foyer. After some discussion, it was Council consensus for the Economic Development Ccemmittee to work on this idea. Discussion followed on some of the activities which were upcoming for the City Center Development education/ information process. Peggy Weston Byrd coamnented on an upcoming meeting with a representative from Les Aucoin°s office to discuss the need for a full-service post office. b. Study Session Items: o It was noted that there was a Tigard School District joint meeting with City Council on October 16. o City Administrator noted that the Washington County Elections Division requested a ballot box for the September election be placed in city Hall. After discussion, council consensus was not in favor of a ballot box in City Hall, since the City had an issue on the ballot. It Law suggested that the Fire Hall be used as it had been in the past. OUMML PMWY FS - OMUBM 9, 1989 - PAM 2 o City Engineer reviewed a petition from Bull Mountain residents concerning the Three mountain residential subdivision. The i residents were concerned that a center twin lane from Bull Mountain Road into the entrance of the Three Mountain residential subdivision and a school bus turnout, as part of the modifications ndw being made to Bull Mountain Road be inplemented. City Engineer described the problem noting that one property owner was losing some property to right-of-ray because of road alignment. City Engineer advised the County had reviewed the plans and the left turn lane and the bus pull out were not required. (Councilor Eadon arrived at 7:20 p.m.) f, Discussion followed. City Engineer noted that staff did not feel there was a strong need for the turn lane, and therefore, did not reoonmended it. However, the residents in the area wanted these additional corditions of develcpanent. Councilor Johnson noted Bull Moountain jurisdiction issues deserved more discussion time at a future meeting. City Engineer noted it was within the Planning Commission's authority to make a recndation for the turn lane and bus turnout. However, due to some misinformation, this was not coordinated effectively with the County. Mayor Edwards noted reservations about using large amounts of city staff time on issues outside City limits. Councilor Johnson stressed that the Bull Mountain Transportation Study must be oompleted as soon as possible. The situation could be reviewed again from an urban-services delivery point of view. There was further discussion on the issue. Council consensus was that the transportation issues for the Bull Mountain area should be discussed more fully and should be scheduled on a future agenda. (Business meeting was called to order at 7:42 p.m.) 3. VIS32MIS AGENDA: No visitors. 4. PIV)3 MCK: mgAB3LT rv gRMpMOW APPAIDRIESS PEN H - CKMICI Ht 1989 ~F Y a. Proclamation was read by Mayor Edwards. (A copy of said proclamation has been filed with the packet meeting material.) z r i OOMK:IL f !DKWO - OCIEt 9, 1989 - PALE 3 i r. 5. CXYSSHRr Aft 5.1 Approve Council Minutes: August 21, and September 11, 1989 5.2 Receive and File: a. Council Calendar b. Certified 9/19/89 Election Results 5.3 Notify State of Oregon of City of Tigard's Position on Video Poker Gambling - Resolution No. 89-77 5.4 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Focal Contract Review Board (LCRB) Meeting: a) Award Bid for Janitorial services; b) Award Bid for Crack Sealer. Adjourn LCM; reconvene Council Meeting. ' 5.5 Approve Criteria for Evaluation of City Administrator 5.6 Call for Public Hearing and Receive Engineer's Report - 135th LID- Resolution No. 89-78. Motion by Councilor Johnson; seconded by Councilor Kasten, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 6. OF IUMEW6 R]MME r ON 9CHEDUIE - CYZDINANCE NO. 89-25 AN CIRDIlIANCE AVE24MM CHAPTER 2.48 OF THE TIGARD NEWCIPAIL CODE PERTAINIM TO THE eL►SSTRTCA`d'IC K, RElE MC K, AMID 'IH IC K OF CIIY RHQMM6, AMID FECI G AN EFFECT WE DATE. Motion by Councilor Johnson; seconded by Councilor Kasten to approve the Ordnance. -The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 7. NCK-AG NM IMM: a. Ed Murphy distributed a survey concerning planning and development issues. In anticipation of the upcoming October 23rd Work Session, he requested that Council complete the survey to help determine which topics were of most concern. He requested the surveys be returned by Monday, October 16. 8. ERCUE VE SESSICH: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 7:50 p.m., under the provision of ORS 192.660(l) (d), (e), (h) & (i) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues, and City Administrator evaluation. i i f i 00=3:L !UUM - OCLOBFR 9, 1989 - PAGB 4 i. i x,9$9 vew 9:20 Pmon 9. . Tigard City' mil city ~ or City f Y 1009 He~WC7i2D~~ gox Ellen Recordin9 secretary. S {1 5 P OC.I' 9' 1989- 1 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal?-b388 P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684.0360 Notice BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 i Legal Notice Advertising° The fol,ow,n i don F $ enda `tans are p411 uifonna- urtlier mfo Tearsheet Notice 1 1989y the icy. . • City of Tigard • 1:3 OCT 3 + Recorder 13125: S ~ by call P.O. Box 23397uw$ '391 y~, y P WN 13 Y.' 3'~ `eta ^ r k q ` • T i and , OR 97223 ° Duplicate Affidavit CIR OF T! 9 CX'#IL1i~TCIL`REGLTLARIVSEEi'ING BER:. ;`1989`' 6 30PA STUDY SBSSION7i O PM BUS S MEETII~IG • TIGARD:CMC C1'I1R 'I'OWN.HALL~ ` s ,13125 SW HALI, BOULByARD', TIGpRD, OREGOIJ, A tJ „ sStudy Sessron/R!orkshopwiEconomic Development Colnttutfee r Proclamat<on Disc M bffit y. M ilogmenE Awareness Qi Ocouber 1989 • Local Contract. Review -r e Consideration of R'~`.. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATIONo'b18etentibn Schedule.0iduiattce .e Executliie Session under:the provisionsi S. `of OR .192;6G0 (1) (d), (e) ` STATE OF OREGON, ) (h)' & M to discuss labor relations, real 1 rty transacttons current & COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. pendtgg htigagon°issiles, and City Admuustrator's erraluaaon.` xa Alice Muirden ZvodceoTowitTailMeegngs; Tlie folowin8 being first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Advertising meedngshavebeenscheduledtoprOvideatZOpportututy} Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tigard Times for citizens to ask cuestlons about th4roppsed Cit.Centersvel a newspaper of general circulation s defined in ORS 193.010 Plan which will app'r on "IRC opmatC and 193.020; published at T i ga r in the Lz r Kay s yS AQit S{9 4sc> of B aid county. ~n statte that the Tuesday, October 14 ~ 71% ,fn 7r H ` i y Coun i ee i hg " ie~ tYx i$h u►*~yF;: a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the Wednesday entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and °r;y the" y t r. If ou need consecutive in the following issues: I City Hall furtherutf a, y ' ~A 4t -7774388 October 5, 1989~~.,,> H F Subscribed and swor to before me this 6th of October, 1989 Notary Public for Oregon My Commissi n Expires: 6/9/93 AFFIDAVIT . aA-~uRaA'~ 1989 PRSaAY 7 OCCoDER THURSDAY 6 WEDNESpAY 5 TUES-W 4 7PN► COUR'C 10pM 2 & THCR MONDAY 6 ; 30- SUNDAY 3 ROARCWAIR- ~-3•~PO-~2 r 14 2 COMMx~TEE CF1CR r'bo 0 ##3 13 1 PE 3~ ~o ; p0~~ ~PM NP N3NG THCR 12 PC-AN SgxON ~ Tki ~c U~;E - COMMI 11 2- 7 PM COURT 7 PIA LAND HO 10 TH & CH~CR tlCTU TVtA "CRANSPOR F 9 7~_9PM COU%CI.I T WN F1ALl MTG CDCR sDRARY 21 F TOWN kF TN C3CY POWDER ~RQGN, gT-a RD tTHCt? $ 6 : 3~ Y 5 sON MEE3 TN TWAF x rY 7 : SOMA NP 20 SCUD CENTER kksGH CaCR 19 7:3oP~N &UTH~ JUNxOR s-- 18 SA - COURT r 17 2-•7 & THC~ PARK TN 15 16 COUNC3•t QOAR~ cDCR 30PM %P( TDQ 2$ 27 6 7 AGENDA _ 7. SopM PLANNTTEF STUDY '10% ` TF_CCR COW.1g 26 25 TH COURT - 23 M UTT rTY ~k f &MTPrFC-R-- 22 6TUDY SESSION PRANCHI COUNCt 5 SPECIAL W/SAKE 7 Op~H &UT~ OQv- 0 _ BA - 31 30 29 H"oL w~EN oom "all Co el pQ0cQ me t C e ence T own Room 'V VA To &ervic COnfTHCR ` Communi y es (TkjCR) CDCR Community 10;30AM (CH & THCR, CSCR `Modular a:30 12;30PMT & THCR~ MOD ` eti n ment 5PM 1H & THCR ke~0O1CR dA~re y eTria~ 9 30 _ Hea a aI Court: 122:30 - c1p DeparTuesday MUni. I Count: SeoondWednesday -MunicLpa Every Thursday ` Every TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal7_6388 P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684.0360 Notice BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising PP t, • City of Tigard nnrl ~ • ❑ Tearsheet Notice < P.O. Box 23397 ~911?9 Tigard, OR 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. I, Alice Muirden being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the T i gard T i mes a newspaper of general cirgylation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at I i g a r a in the afcmyidCounc, rAee%te~tghat the a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and consecutive in the following issues: October 5, 1989 I` Subscribed and swor to before me this 6th of October, 1989 Notary Public for Oregon My Commiss xpires: 69/93 AFFIDAVIT The following selected age items are published for your intbrma- f on. Further mforination and tu~li agendas may lie q~ from- the City RecoNer, 13125 S.W. Ha11 BvuTevani,.Tl , ing 639-4171 Y a 1 thegao 97223, or by call- CIZ"it.COi7NCIL REGULAR MEETING :'OCTOBER 9,4989 6:301?M STUDY SESSION-7-30 PM BUSINESS MEETING._ . TIGARD CMC CEI`ITER, TOWN HALL. 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OR9" • Study. Session/Workshop witk;Economic Development:.Committee • Proclamation-Disability Employment Awareness Month - October 1989 • Local Contract Review Board' - • Consideration of Records Retention Schedule Ordinance ' • Executive Session =`under the provisions of ORS' 192.660 O 1 . ((0; (e) (h), & (i) W' discuss lalior:relations, real property transactions, cummnt &; Pending litigation issues, and City Adrriuustrator's,evaluadon. .l Notice of Town Hail Meetings The following meetings have been.scheduled toprovide an opporttmity for citizens to ask questions about.the g;oPosed City Center Development Plan which will appear on the No•)etnbera7;1£9f89, speezaia~cn:Iuta,lr In Ballot. L~ M J ; 'It~esaay, October 10 7 9~ .m Iyty dr H,gk in WednesdAy. October 7 k 1laom 4 11 9p;tn ac ~+ler~Tr` H~~h K Itl Ma s nrw ] n If)" need ford..-inf' E L~ l f ¢ u ~ e k~` ~S4N City Tull (Telephone No's 1'~e`Ctty 1 tdRs 1r 1T6388 PuljLslc't)Cto '~f' S; ~ : ar aler3)tt~a7~a`wx`A+~•„ 4 K.r. ~~5 ~ ~t~, ~i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed Or Chi Q 0 11 CC' No . sv- d t STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss City of Tigard ) I, being first duly sworn, on oath, depo and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) Flq - ~ 5 which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated ClZS copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the I 2n, day of 1980. 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. 2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon 3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 4. Albertson's Store, Corner of Pacific Hwy. (State Hwy. 99) and S.W. Durham Road, Tigard, Oregon Subscribed and sworn to before me this /ve-A day of Notary tic for Oregon My C fission Expires: 3 r_ .0FE14DA'^<ZTEM 2- VISITOR' S' AGENDA GATE 10/9/$9•} 4° (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED Tlease !mss n± S PE'fITIUN September 18, 1989 ..5Wyi We as residents of Bull Mountain do petition that the Three Mountain Residential subdivision include a center turn lane from Bull Mountain Road into the entrance of the Three Mountain Residential subdivision, and a school bus pull-out as part of the modifications now being made to Bull Mountain Road. A center turn lane was part of the commitments and promises made by the city of Tigard during public hearings relating to the subdivision. The school bus pull-out was recommended during the public hearings and the Tigard School District has recommended it as well. In as much as these commitments and recommendations are not being honored we ask that the construction now in progress be suspended until the center turn lane and school bus pull-out are included in the construction plans. We are concerned for the safety and traffic flow for the community which must use Bull Mountain Road as the only source of access. NAME ADDRESS PHONE N g'l7 ci'~l rl, 141 L ~ ~ ---mod ct v,~ l/1n~uc`~cT at>>•~D~~~-, /~L57S13r/~~ i i IN SO _~Q C1 J-C 14` ~`~.25•_!L'J 1'~, E '.CI2/4z ./a ~~l u~`~ / y S. c y. %ucCG ~~C ~t~, ly~~0 -1.•'/ 510 OVA, 36 _7 C-i 17 c n v , 1 r Councit rrma;C I Dhlfq PETITION September 18, 1989 We as residents of Bull Mountain do petition that the Three Mountain Residential subdivision include a center turn lane from Bull Mountain Road into the entrance of the Three Mountain Residential subdivision, and a school bus pull-out as part of the modifications now being made to Bull Mountain Road. A center turn lane was part of the commitments and promises made by the city of Tigard during public hearings relating to the subdivision. The school bus pull-out was recommended during the public hearings and the Tigard School District has recommended it as well. In as much as these commitments and recommendations are not being honored we ask that the construction now in progress be suspended until the center turn lane and school bus pull-out are included in the construction plans. We are concerned for the safety and traffic flow for the community which must use Bull Mountain Road as the only source of access. NAME ADDRESS PHONE # ep >p_ 7o v l~ 1,361,25 JAZ 13 Y'L/ 72)>7% SW~ i~' PQ1~ Z~,-v ASS 44 is r 3fi J6 G 3V vim:~z 5 'L Al /5175 ZSW ELI C-c- FIT _012 2 w u~~ /st77y a-,j/c q PE'T'ITION September 18, 1989 We as residents of Bull Mountain do petition that the Three Mountain Residential subdivision include a center turn lane from Bull Mountain Road into the entrance of the 't'hree Mountain Residential subdivision, and a school. bus pull-out as part of the modifications now being made to Bull Mountain Road. A center turn lane was part of the commitments and promises made by the city of Tigard during public hearings relating to the subdivision. The school. bus pull-out was recommended during the public hearings and the Tigard School District has recommended it as well. In as much as these commitments and recommendations are not being honored we ask that the construction now in progress be suspended until the center turn lane and school. bus pull-out are included in the construction plans. We are concerned fur the safety and traffic flow for the community which must use Bull Mountain Road as the only source of access. NAME ADDRESS PHONE # Z , . 14U 70 'S ,,I ~r0Lt"'.` ' ~vi7._rl / SYj , ~,l? ~ ~,%ii','~l~',~/'. l..eu n-r_l ~ (~•7C/7/ d A e, (5•A.( ._~1~~ l ~l'yv.~ .,~~i I ✓ L) / 1'`•'•~) li .1,Ci f-L~:1' OZ f c,- • c _ O -lu . lc l r~; rY 1 . ,.kh c 5L "L' ~ircT~~ ,C AL 1 /yr/,f,J~~/ V i ,...1-'t.~- chi / `!t S 4:'. S <<•'a~:-._i . ,T_ ' ~ PETITION September 18, 1989 We as residents of Bull Mountain do petition that the Three Mountain Residential subdivision include a center turn lane from Bull Mountain Road into the entrance of the Three Mountain Residential subdivision, and a school bus pull-out as part of the modifications now being made to Bull Mountain Road. A center turn lane was part of the commitments and promises made by the city of Tigard during public hearings relating to the subdivision. The school bus pull-out was recommended during the public hearings and the Tigard School District has recommended it as well. In as much as these commitments and recommendations are not being honored we ask that the construction now in progress be suspended until the center turn lane and school bus pull-out are included in the construction plans. We are concerned for the safety and traffic flow for the community which must use Bull Mountain Road as the only source of access. NAME ADDRESS PHONE # lix) 7z7 yC 16 S?_ ~c 9 Cyr , k'r~ro~c s~ 7,L z 13 zi ` .2~s1 ~_~V AA Ty -ti (7elt , PETITION September 18, 1989 We as residents of Bull Mountain do petition that the Three Mountain Residentia) zubdivision include a center turn lane from Bull Mountain Road into the entrance of the Three Mountain Residential subdivision, and a school bus pull-out as part of the modifications now being made to Bull Mountain Road. A center turn lane was part of the commitments and promises made by the city of Tigard during public hearings relating to the subdivision. The school bus pull-out was recommended during the public hearings and the Tigard School District has recommended it as well. In as much as these commitments and recommendations are not being honored we ask that the construction now in progress be suspended until the center turn lane and school bus pull-out are included in the construction plans. We are concerned for the safety and traffic flow for the community which must use Bull Mountain Road as the only source of access. {i NAME ADDRESS PHONE # t r r 14 '_<3 A 2, 7 'S ~ll ~~`Gi G/`a~,l--i~~ ~ ~5~'} 7 G~ SGcJ ~J~~~-~!f ~i~c~ /~/2 • t _.~t,{1cYr'cr.,%.~uL /ILc~~2,..vti,~• !5 v,.. }~al.~.;_G: ~r,n:l~ cv3r; -(v3~f7_ , ~~_c7 `.4F Zi 2 57 q, r 112 6'9 1W 4? i % .,.~Jrz~~7? z~ PETITION September 18, 1989 We as residents of. Bull Mountain do petition that the Three Mountain Residential subdivision include a center turn lane from Bull Mountain Road into the entrance of the Three Mountain Residential subdivision, and a school bus pull-out as part of the modifications now being made to Bull Mountain Road. A center turn lane was part of the commitments and promises made by the city of Tigard during public hearings relating to the subdivision. The school bus pull-out was recommended during the public hearings and the Tigard School District has recommended it as well. In as much as these commitments and recommendations are not being honored we ask that the construction now in progress be suspended until the center turn lane and school bus pull-out are in-"..uded in the construction plans. We are concerned for the safety and traffic flow for the community which must use Bull Mountain Road as the only source of access. NAME ADDRESS PHONE # i /D af. ~LrL 7-0/1 I,w G , jp$ c~ ucc l~2lvU S. W, ~-~~Glf l ar 63`'1 40 .~.J'~~^.-c .C~- c~~ cL ~ Ltt-c...~~ ~ ! G ~ J-~,c. •I.•.J ~c.r~G. fig f.~ (O .3 J /y Y -7~y6) ~,lC LGi GC~,t C / e Iz ?~3 F i- 3 r~ i } r PETITION September 18, 1989 We as residents of Bull Mountain do petition that the Three Mountain Residential subdivision include a center turn lane from Bull Mountain Road into the entrance of the Three Mountain Residential subdivision, and a school bus pull-out as part of the modifications now being made to Bull Mountain Road. A center turn lane was part of the commitments and promises made by the city of Tigard during public hearings relating to the subdivision. The school bus pull-out was recommended during the public hearings and the Tigard School District has recommended it as well. In as much as these commitments and recommendations are not being honored we ask that the construction now in progress be suspended until the center turn lane and school bus pull-out are included in the construction plans. We are concerned for the safety and traffic flow for the community which must use Bull Mountain Road as the only source of access. NAME' n ADDRESS PHONE # ~ 7''~~p. i 5 ~/o S scc~ (3 3 rzQ ~39•~i5~~ b~r7z l"« /-'C ~Y l 0 .S. G.7. /f~ ~S 7a 6 y(/~C91 212. r_e- /YD/D -SC.J 6a7-YsU/ ~liiGlye.C~ ' G.L~,✓ ~`/6 ~S-" /~//-a~~c~c. ~~2fc>D ~?D 8~ ~GL~~ti , c - c/~ ~S S•l~J . !c , f ~r O ~a %6~~ 'Zo V6ys 6ry 20615~ /L J`J~~S l1d4Y'A Cn -359'F f `~lC~ ~c•/ 14 Ic, R C7 &Zd-~Z7C (ago 3k~ S /ySFiS S[✓ /S//--r ('1r.r_ ..fct.i..cQ 6,3`)-3JJ7 ~~,•-~~~~f~ /7"2S~.S Sf~• SCt:i ~`rJe L-~~ %i~~rVoi X39-2b CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEK SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 9, 1989 DATE SUEM'ITID: September 28, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Proclamation - PREVIOUS ACTION: Disability Employment Awareness N!o PREPARED BY: Cathy Wheatley DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADNM OK RDQUESTID BY: Mayor Edwards POLICY ISSUE INFDRMATION SUMMARY October has been designated as Disability Employment Awareness Month in the United States. Governor Goldschmidt has been asked to proclaim October as Disability Employment Awareness month in Oregon also. The Oregon Disabilities Ccunission has contacted some of the larger municipalities to ask city officials to issue similar proclamations for their cities. Zhe Oregon Disability Commission advises: Disability issues are in the forefront of national affairs. As Congress deliberates the Americans with Disabilities Act as a means of extending civil rights to persons with disabilities, attention is being focused on barriers which people of disability encounter on a daily basis. Removal of those barriers is a primary goal of the Oregon Disabilities Cc mnission. Disability Employment Awareness Month was instituted by Congress in 1988 to call attention to the barriers which people with disabilities face in attempting to secure employment. An estimated two-thirds of adult Americans with disabilities are unemployed. This represents a costly loss of talent and tragic waste of human potential. ALZiT1VFS CONSIDERED 1. Proclaim October as Disability Employment Awareness Month. 2. Amend the Proclamation 3. Decline action at this time. FISCAL IMPACT N/A SUGGESTED ACTION Proclaim October as Disability Employment Awareness month. cw.proc 'Y r" PROCLAMATION s WHEREAS, two-thirds of working-age Americans with disabilities are out of the job market; and WHEREAS, we wish to salute the achievements of Oregonians with disabilities who contribute to their families and communities and to society through their jobs; and WHEREAS, we salute the many employers and organizations who consistently provide employment opportunities for people with disabilities, thereby setting an example for others; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Tigard are pleased to join with the rest of the nation to observe October as National Disability Employment Awareness Month. NOW THEREFORE, I. Jerry Edwards, Mayor of the City of Tigard, hereby proclaim October 1989 as y eY✓ DISABILITY EMPLOYMENT AWARENESS MONTH r in the City of Tigard and encourage all citizens to join in this observance. ~i61pyC.~ Jerry Edwards, Mayor City of Tigard t ATTEST: City Recorder Yr f • Cpl. Date z 4j. P C: ra -H 44 v ..off ~ ~ ro ~ a~~ , ~ b o ;1mo 4- 4. r-I V B § 44 (0 04 P4 49 .61 8 44 b w . C U b O 41 V .0• 14 H I ro o o 0. :Hp H b ~o 0 44 UP 44 44 ° o a y I pp y,., U o qq~~ U ~ ~ . ~ •n .i~ I R w fTI ~ • E v a' 14 A ~ ~ z° ~ • • ~ ~ ~ to ~ ~ I 4~4 iz Q r-1 N M 4. OCKSENT AGENDA: 4.1 Approve Council Minutes - August 14, 1989 4.2 Receive and File: Council Calendar 4.3 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) Meeting: Authorize Contract for Engineering Services for the Durham Road Bond Project; Adjourn LCRB; Reconvene Council Meeting 4.4 Appropriate Contingency Participation in the Tualatin Valley Economic Development Corporation (WEDC) - Resolution No. 89-70 4.5 Set Garbage Rates for Roll-Out Containers - Resolution No. 89-71 Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 5. CQ~'IN~TICN OF PUBLIC HIMING - AMUalg= TO TBE 71GARD M(MCIPAL CODE (TME), CHAPTER 7.40 (NDL%) Atwirtnents to the Noise Ordi.tumice provisions of the TW. a. Public Hearing continued from August 14, 1989 b. Doammuty Development Director reviewed this agenda item. He referenced the Study Session discussion by City Council and noted Council's. desire to spend 30 days testing the specifications outlined in the ordinance. C. Mayor Edwards announced the public hearing would be continued to a date uncertain. He advised all persons who signed in to testify at this meeting would be notified of the new date and time once it has been sdieduled for the contiumuation of the public hearing. 6. PUMIC EUMM1G - C33.Y CENTEP, OEPEW PLAN Council comhSideration of an ordinance to adapt the City Center Development Plan and consideration of a resolution to accept the City Center Report on the Plan. 7 he City Center Development Plan study area is bordered by Hall Boulevard on the east, Highway 99 on the north, Fanno Creek Park and O'Mara Street on.the south, and McKenzie and Hill streets on the west. a. Public Hearing was opened. b. - Declarations or challenges: None. C. Summation by Ocmmunity Development Direct: _ Before Council was an orciinance'which would adopt the City Center Development Plan and a resolution which would accept the accompanying City Center Development Report. Oounci.l reviewed this material on April 10, 1989; since that time, council has looked at some. changes to the prop^..sals. These changes included: COUNCIL MaWr'ES - September 11, 1989 - Page 2 C. o A project was added which would extend Greenburg Road to Hall Boulevard. o Language was added to strengthen the historic preservation provisions. o Two projects were deleted: 1) public restrooms in the downtown, and 2) a conmunity center. o Acceptance of draft relocation policies. o Acceptance of a draft land-use statement which outlines types of land uses for the downtown which would be encouraged to be developed over time. o Process implementation to change the Comprehensive Plan Traffic Map for the proposed realignment of Burnham to Tigard Street and the proposed Ash Avenue Extension. A proposed ordinance, accomplishing this change, would be before. Council later this meeting. Cacammnity Development Director advised meetings were held with interested parties on August 2, 7, and 29. There has been further discussion with Legal Counsel regarding the amencbieezt section of the Plan and language has been introduced which should be more workable and clear. The Plan, in essence, was a renewal plan intended to identify. what was necessary in the way of public capital projects and programs to "r stimulate project investment and development in the downtown area.. C7ommai ty Development Director reviewed material which. recapped Revenue Sources,. FVenditure by Type of Project, and those Projects Funded by Tax Increment Funs Only. The proposed ballot title would be presented to Council for their consideration on September 25, 1989. council wt-- i d decide, at that time, whether or not this Plan should be put on the. November '7, 1989 Special Election Ballot. . The voters would decide whether to . give Council the authority to use tax increment financing for an urban renewal program. Voters wo ld not be approving a levy; they would not see this as a tax on their tax bill. community Development Director recounted additional steps needed which included Council appointment of an Advisory C7ommittee; additional public education; refinement and adoption of final relocation policies; implementation of an alignment study of Walnut/Hunziker connection (aka Ash Avenue Octension) and the Tigard/Burnham connection. Scene projects were already underway. The design and construction of the Main Street Bridge was scheduled for next suomer. COUNCIL N URM3S - September 11, 1989 - Page 3 Zoning and development-design standards should be reviewed. Because there will not be any funds available until there is some increment generated, the first year would be devoted to organizational activities: o Establishment and education of the Advisory committee o Establishment of "soft" programs which would include: - building-loan programs - relocation programs - marketing Cam mnity Development Director recommended Council adopt the Plan by ordinance and accept the accompanying report by resolution. d. Public Testimony o Chuck Woodard, 10215 S.W. Walnut, Tigard, OR 97223 (also' a business owner at Burnham and' Main Street). Mr. Woodward recapped the process from the time of the joint city council - and Planning ecacmission meeting and subsequent meetings. He advised he had testified in favor of the Plan, 'although there were several elements which were not to -his liking. He complimented the City Center Task Force noting they had done a fine job. He said the road program (TIgard/Dmnh= realignment and Ash Avenue Extension) had created-considerable controversy.- Mr. Woodard said. people have advised him they felt the traffic plans were not workable and this co xxmis him. He 'empbasized that he wanted the program, but feels that his concerns and SLr gestions have not been heard or ~ revi ewed seriously. He commented on the last public hearing wftxein his t:est:ima ny was limited. He noted the growing opposition- to the street realignment plan by the Netliodist Qnmdh. He hiMAhis areas of carxxrns with the traffic plan and the J uVact it would have an existing busii~_-,ses and homes. Mr. Woodward said he dial not have an opportunity to explain. his proposal, during previous testimonY. He 'noted concern -that he should raoeive acknowledgment and t mughtful review of his proposal. Mr. Woodard suggested the transportation portion of the Plan be reviewed and atxsther option for a traffic proposal be identified. Because of the opposition to the current proposal, Mr. Woodard said-he felt the Development Plan would be defeated at the November election. Mr. Woodard spent some time eutlinirg Specific areas of the transportation realigrmexd s which were of concern to him. OOUMCM MINUTES - September 11, 1989 - Page 4 ~ C He concluded his remarks by saying: "I'm for it, let's do it right." o Sydney Hieb, Tigard Business Owner, 16285 S.W. 85th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon, asked Council to vote for the City Center Development Plan. She noted transportation problems throughout Tigard and said it was imperative that the downtown area be developed. Such development would benefit all of Tigard's businesses; it was essential that this happens now. o Pat FUrrer, Attorney at 9185 S.W. Burnham and resides at 12270 S.W. 116th, Tigard, Oregon, testified he was Chairman of the F Urban Penewal Advisory ConwLittee when it was first put together several years ago. The voters of the City had an opportunity to vote on the urban renewal package, but the financing was defeated. He noted Tigard was in some disappointing political times at that point; the cc mnitment of the Council and cmmunity was to stop Tigard's growth. Because of this philosophy, he said Tigard was 15 to 20 years behind the cities of Beaverton and Tualatin. mr. Furrer noted council has an opportunity to omplete their F. ocxmnitment to support and being the community forward. He r noted elements of the Plan, such as the transportation plan, need to be fine tuned to be the least amount of impact to individual property owners and the most beneficial to everyone k' in the a wmunity. He said these issues could be worked out.. f. i Mr. Flrrer admowledged that the Plan would not, nor could it, mike everyone happy. The vast majority of people, however, would lake to see this area of the cammunity invigorated. He pointed out that the voters entrusted each Council member to work in the best interest of the City. He said he thought Council had an obligation to fund and implement the Development Plan. He noted Tigard possesses a great school district and residential eo¢mmnities; it is council's responsibility to take action to provide opportunities for E businesses to prosper. t He noted the change in the eoaminity: Citizens were receptive, intelligent, and responsible. Y o Bob Moore, 12575 S.W. Grant, Tigard, Oregon, testified he does not want to be opposed to any proposal which would mean good improvement in the area. He notes concerns with the transportation proposal; specifically, with signalization of the BmTibam/Tigard Street connection and aeompanying problems of traffic as affected by the railroad tracks. He also noted opposition to the realignment of Walnut Street if it would cut COUNCIL MINUTES - September 11, 1989 - Page 5 Y through the Tigard Methodist Church parking lot. He said it appeared as if the Plan made the statement that roads were more important than what they serve. Mr. Moore said there were other valid concerns equal to road planning. o Stuart Cohen, former Chain of the City Center Plan Task Force, testified the Task Force was responsible for the development of the Plan and Report. The documents represent the culmination of a two-year effort by the citizens which made up the Task Force. They attempted to receive as much input as they possibly could from a variety of interest groups within the city to shape a Plan which would address a multiplicity of concerns. He said he believed the adoption of the Plan and Report would be the first step in a long journey which would ultimately lead to the revitalization of the dow~. Council's action would send a loud message to the citizens and businesses of Tigard that the city council was willing to take an active role in the future of the downtown. Mr. Cohen stroaxgly urged adoption of the ordinance approving the City Center Development Plan. o Wandi Hawley, 14790 S.W. 79th, Tigard, Oregon, testified she would like to see the adjectives that describe Tigard change. It's not just a °whistle-stcpa, estop light", or "traffic jam" - Tigard is a beautiful, growing city. She would like to see this expressed in the b iidbigs of the downtown. She noted the revitalization plans have been discussed for the last two years. She recapped the Ranno Creek Conference List February where at the conclusion of the Conference, a vote was taken; the clear majority was in favor of city center dev+elcpment. She advised the Conference attendees, while not a complete cross-section of - the citizenry of Tigard, represented '-can do" pecple - which. she thought comprised the majority of the people in Tigard. F Ms. Hawley enooura ed the City council to vote for the Plan i; and then refine it. e. Reno ion by the eomam ty Development Dnvctor: Adapt the City Comer Development Plan by ordinance and the Report on the City center Development Plan by resolution. In response to the two oontxoversi al projects (the realig meat of Burrham/Tigar+d and the proposed aligrment of Ash Avm-we), he noted these have been disaussed in concept for several years and have always been controversial. He said he thought the council took the correct action to make the proposal official by amending the Comprehensive Plan. This way, the . CIDW H1, KDMES - September 11, 1989 - Page 6 ) citizenry now has an opportunity to advise Council of their feelings about the proposal. Coamminity Development Director recapped the two-year process which resulted in the reacemnendation that these changes be implemented in the Traffic Map. The City Center is more than just Main Street. The idea was that over the 16-year timeframe, more of the City Center would develop into a full office and conmiercial area. Main Street, by itself, cannot handle any increased traffic which was why there was a need for review and implementation of traffic improvements (i.e., more access points or "portals" into the downtown). co mrnitriity Development Director acknowledged Mr. Woodard's suggestions. while these ideas were not reviewed in great detail, he said he thought they were looked at sufficiently to determine problem areas or were discovered to not meet the primary objective to bring another portal into the downtown. . Staff was proposing that a consultant be hired to help determine exactly where the Pacific-99. to Hunziker aligmrent should be. If it was discovered that it could not practically be built, then the Council may choose to amend the Downtown Plan. The alignment study would give some of those answers ( and would also determine which route would cause the least disruption possible. Coaardty Development Director noted council had received material which dealt .rith how the Plan would be. amended in the future. This clarification language dealt with the 16 year time period, boundary auuVes, and addition of projects. Minor amendments could be made without a vote of the. people. The definition of a major and mirror amendment would be stipulated in the Plan. f. Public Hearing was closed. g. Council comments: Mayor read a September 11, 1989, letter submitted by Councilor Valerie Jd>nson concerning the City Centex' Development. A copy of this letter 1S attached to these minutes and, by reference, is made a part hereof. Mayor commented that he did not hear anyone speak against the Plan nor had he heard most of the business community speak against the Plan. However, he said he has heard a great deal of the same concerns that Mr. Woodard presented. Mayor apologized to Mr. Woodard for not expressing clearly enough that he, too, shared many of these same concerns. Mayor COUNCIL MI UfES - September 11, 1989 - Page 7 i ti 8 ft o n old P ?It :03 Q r'i 1~ fD '~C ~ r'f ~t p~ p rn N ~ ~ ~ O W ~ f+• h► ct ~ Y' rA O ~ p ~ RD RD Ct ~D rn T7 b • Y (t fD H (p . C co ~1 ►'A V1 ~ N Y• .0 fT Y (p ~ (D 1D Y• N F+ (t 0 m ' ro M (D • ` ffi m aMort c, Y.: . ~ 1 m rt O(CD 0 rt C a R a . C (6 1 rt m b a rt ~r R AARM (Q O~ ~O 15D (t All n a b 5 a 0 Y. v 1R. m (D R O C (D ► I ID ffi w oro am 1 M (D a N, N ro cn ~ rt Y•~ rt • a ~ rt n ct ~ 7i' (D ~C R I N R N ~ rn r i ro (D creating the Plan which has been modified as they have received input. He said the word "framework" instead of "plan" may be a better term. The Plan was framework that would support, over the next 15 years, the revitalization, the growth, and the development of the City of Tigard. The Plan was not specific in every minute detail nor did he think it could be. He advised that no one in the City was so wise that they could accurately predict the future in as much detail that some critics of the Plan desired to hear. He said that his conversations with voters in the community have resulted in a show of overwhelming support for the concept for revitalization of the City. He advised he would support the Plan. h. City Attorney advised that items to be included for amendment to the plan were submitted by staff to Council. These suggestions are attached to these minutes (Attachment 2). He suggested the motion for adoption include within it the statement that the items included in this document be incorporated. i. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to adopt the proposed ordinance including the amerx meats as noted by the City Attorney. ORDINANCE NO. 89-23. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE TIGARD CM CENI'E12 DEVEMPMENT PLAN. The ordinance was adopted by a unanimous vote of City Council present. j. RESOWTION NO. 89-72. A RESOU)I•ION ACCEPTING THE CITY MM M DEVEfAPMENT REPORT. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to adopt Resolution No. 89-72. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 7. FINAL CRDER - PIAN ABRUMM CPA 89-06 ASH AVENUE, ID O/TIGAM RMWMEW, NPO 11 - MMINANCE W. 89-24. a. ORDINANCE NO. 89-24. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FIM NGS AND CONCCIJSIONS TO APPROVE AN AM UMU TO THE PIAN 7RAANNSPORT MOM MAP (CPA 89-06 ASH AVENUE AND BUMCWTIGARD REATA:QZ T) PJUMSTED BY Tim CITY OF TIGARD. b. Motion by Council Eadon, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to adopt Ordinance No. 89-24. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. COUNCIL MIN1 S - September 11, 1989 - Page 9 8. SE130M READING OF ORDINANCE M_ 89-22; ZONE CHANGE ANNEM=CN ZCA 89-06 TAIRA- IMIWS ORATION (FUFMffX W Dom.); NPO ,1E3 a. Mayor noted that an individual had signed in on the Visitor's Agenda testimony sheet, to testify on this issue. After confirmation from the City Attorney, Mayor advised the opportunity for testimony had been given at the public hearing on this issue. No further testimony could be accepted on the issue. b. Second Reading: ORDINANCE NO. 89-22. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLJJSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZCA 89-06) (TAIPA--UAUS CORPORATION; FORMERLY DANIEL) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. C. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to adopt Ordinance No. 89-22. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 9. NW-AGENDA a. Community Development Direct-nor reported that in the proposed parks levy there was an additional two acres Council would like to see purchased as part of the Stun merlake Park. The owner/developer of the property has submitted crostructicn drawings for review. Staff was reccrmiending that since the developer would like to know whether or not the City was interested in the property, a formal offer should be made contingent upon the levy passing. If the levy should fail to pass, the Council could withdraw that offer. Submitted for Council review was a resolution of intent to acquire the real property for Rnmierlake Park b-Tr+ovemeni-.s. This would give staff and legal counsel the authority to make an offer and in the event an agreement cannot be reached, then the City would prepare to acquire the property under eminent domain procedures. b. RESOIIJPICH NO. 89-73 - A RESOLUTION DEC APM4G THE NDCESSrIY AND PURPOSE FOR THE A07JISITICK OF CFUMM REAL PROPERTY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND OO~TSIRU .'ION OF AT S MMEEUAKE PARK AMID THE FULL USE AND WOMMU BY WE PUBLIC OF SUCH naIMBUNTS, AMID AUIIR2IZING THE COIDEMTION OF SAID REAL PROPERLY. C. Motion by C=x-ilor Kasten, seamiled by C=Y--ilor Eadon, to adopt Resolution No. 89-73. The oration was approved by a unanimous vote of Coil present. COUNCIL MINUTES - September 11, 1989 - Page 10-"' r 10. EKOCUME SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 8:48 p. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (a) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. F i i 11. : 9:00 p.m. APPRUM by the Tigard City Council ON 1989. R t r City Recorder - City of Tigai-d r 1 ATTEST: ~r Mayor - City of Tigard cw.OCM911 r s F tt t i i COUNCIL MINUTES - SeptJember 11, 1989 - Page 11 C~ Cou ►-a ci 1 ,~'l inafcs - - September 11, 1989 ?hl lei The Honorable Gerald Edwards Councilor Carolyn Eadon Councilor Joe Kasten Councilor John Schwartz Dear Colleagues: First, may I say only the most urgent of business matters would have kept me from tonight's meeting. I deeply regret that I am unable to be with you to discuss this important matter. Our city center is in dire need of improved public improvements. The traffic axes and circulation is failing the present businesses and property owners. Fanno creek Park has viable potential to be a unique asset to the area, but is currently only developed to a minimal extent. And to be a viable commercial district, the city center must have improved street lighting, additional Parking, adequate pedestrian pathways. Those improvements are not possible from our current general fund revenues. Tigard has considered the issue as a community at considerable length. The 'City center Task Force worked responsibly for over one-year-and-a-half.to present their proposed City Center Plan to us for council consideration. our citizens', committees, the Transportation Advisory Comm ttee and the. Planning Ckmunittee, have both reviewed and endorsed this plan.' Nearly eighty participants of the Fanno Creek Conference, 1988, voted overwhelmingly to support the revitalization of downtown. .w. And finally, my personal conveisatiOM With dozens of individuals over the past 3 years on this matter has been strongly in favor of do nztaHm redevelopment and revitalization. Therefore, fully realizing that many of the details will be determined in future years as fundiM becomes available, I urge you to vote unanimously tonight to place the question of tax increment financing before the residents of Tigard in November 1989. I firmly believe our citizens want to provide an opportunity for our city center to enjoy the rapid growth and value increases happening in the rest of our dynamic city. These improvements will benefit not only the business owners and the property owners in the city center area, it will also benefit. every property aver In Tigard by carryuV a greater share of the tax base/property tax burden. We have a wruxlerful city with only exciting-possibilities. I offer my strong opinion in favor of the same bright, successful future for our downtown. Please, vote in favor of this mater. My best regards to each of you. Yours very truly, /s/ Valerie A. Johnson cw/codev-jo rq ~-~-cE h m,en~ L Ci ~-y Cour~ci l t'Y)inkf'~'S ~ MEMO 9/9/.89 TO: City Council FM: Duane Roberts, Administrative Planner SUBJECT: Tigard City Center Development Plan and Report Please find enclosed the following emendations to the above-mentioned documents: Amendment City Center Development Plan: Page No p. 20, item 1 a change in the description of the proposed Ash Avenue 1 extension and improvement project between pp: 23 a new map showing more clearly the alignment of the 2 & 24, Exhibit "a". proposed Ash Avenue extension p. 24, section 602.C(2), new language proposed by the City 3 -4 p. 35, sections 1200, 1201, & 1202 Attorney dealing with changes to the p. 37, section 1301 Development Plan City Center Development Report: p. 22,-Table 8 under 1. Ash Avenue, the 3,200 listed for City G.O. bonds 5 is revised to 3,120; 80 in tax increment funding is added to the funding source column p. 25, Table 9 under 1. Ash Avenue, 2,700 in tax increment is revised to 6 3,300; in the total cost column, 4,000 is revised to 4,600 i AmenBment Pg_ No_ 2. STREETS AND TRAFFIC (listed alphabetically) 1. Ash Avenue_ Extend and improve Ash Avenue.to provide a connection between the Walnut/Pacific Highway intersection and the Hunziker street/Hall Boulevard intersection, following the approximate alignment of the existing Ash Avenue in the Development Area. 20 CITY CENTER PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES e f Q•Q ti ~ + s r 2 Burnham Street Realignment (exact alignment to be determined) 2 Burnham-Hall Intersection Burnham Street Smprovemeat Burnham Street Enhancement Entryway Development, L nd -aping and Landmark Structures Fanno Park Development Hall and Pacific Intersection Improvement (location to be determined) Public Parking Facilities Ash Avenue Improvements (exact alignment to be determined) " Building Rehabilitation Assistance commercial Street Improvements Pacific Highway Ramp to Tigard Street (location to be determined) Tigard Public Square Development (location to be determined) Hall Boulevard Enhancement Amenamenc rage nci_ O'DONNEL.L.. RAMIS. ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1727 N.W. HOYT STREET PORTLANO. OREGON 97209 (3031 222-AAOZ DATE September 7, 1989 TO Ed Murphy, Director of Community Development, City of Tigard fRoM Timothy V. Ramis, City Attorney's office i RE Urban Renewal Amendments t Based upon our earlier discussion, I propose the following amendments to the June 1, 1989, draft of the Tigard City Center Development Plan. ,section 602!21 should be completely replaced with the f41]-owing language: where property to be acquired is part of a new project, such acquisition shall be regarded as a substantial change and shall comply with the procedures of this Plan as set forth in section 1202(A)." Section 1200 should be completely replaced with the following language: "Section 1200 - Procedures to Change or Amend the } Lour M City Center Development Plan. This Plan will be reviewed and-analyzed periodically and will continue to evolve during the course of its implementation. The Plan may be changed, clarified, and modified or amended as future conditions warrant, subject to the following procedures:" "Section 1201 - Minor Changes. Any change that is not a substantial change, as defined in section 1202 below, shall be proposed by resolution of the Development Agency in which the details of the minor change or changes shall be described- For example, Minor changes include but are not limited to the identification of specific properties to be acquired for approved public capital improvement projects, if different from those properties identified in Exhibit B. (see section 602(A); and properties identified through the adoption of the Property Acquisition Policy (see section 602(B)j-~" Amendment Page No. 4 Memo re Urban Renewal Amendments S6ptember 7, 1989 Page - 2 "Section 1202 - Substantial Changes:. i A. Substantial chancres Pteq-uiring Council Approval. The following changes shall be considered substantial changes to the Plan and shall be approved by the City Council by nonemergency ordinance, pursuant to ORS 457.095, afiter public i i notice and a hearing: j 1. Implementation of land assembly to I coordinate private construction within j the development area; r 2. Improvement program activities that ! amend or add to the activities listed in section 601 (19)-(22). B. Substantial Changes Requiring Voter Approval. The following changes shall be considered i substantial changes to the Plan and.shall be approved by the voters of the City if required by. applicable charter-provisions, after being 1. approved by the City Council in the manner set forth is section A above: 1. Increases in the land area wiiain the' boundaries of the development area; 2. Increases in the duration of the Plan as described in section'1301.; ' 3. New projects as defined in section 212 which are public capital improvement projects." Section 1301 - Duration of Development Plan should be avInded to read: ' "This Plan shall remain in effect for a period of not more than 16 years from the effective date of this Plan. The Plan may be terminated prior to the time set forth above, subject to the requirements of ORS 457, if the City Council finds that there is no longer a need for an urban renewal plan." ► Amendment Page No_ 5 401.B a . Table 8 Projects, Costs & Funding Sources Period: Fiscal Years 1996-2000 (Amounts in Thousands) Project/Activity Funding Source Total Cost* 1. Ash Ave. lmpr. - Walnut to Burnham $ 2,000 LI.D. Assmts 3,120 City G.O. Bonds $ 5,200 80 Tax Increment 2 Building Rehabilitation Assistance 60 Tax Increment 60 3. Commercial St Impr. - Main to Hall 300 LLD. Assmts. 200 Tax Increment 500 4. Entryways, Landscaping, Public Art 60 Tax Increment 20 Private Grants 80 5. Fanno Park Development - Phase Ilf (Master Plan H.9 - H.13) 252 Tax Increment 252 6. Pacific Highway Ramp to Tigard St. 5,600 Dept of Transp. 5,600 7. Public Parking Structure - 500 cars 3,500 Tax Increment 3,500 8. Tigard Public Square Development 1,500 Tax Increment 1.500 Period Total $16.692 *Note: Project costs reflect 4% per year inflation cost increase over current cost estimates r i Period 1996-200 Revenue Summary Tax-Increment Revenues $ 5,652 City Capital Levy or Bond Issue 3.120 Commercial St LLD. Assmts 300 Ash Avenue LLD. Assessments 2,000 State Dept of Transportation 5,600 Private, State and/or Metro Arts Comm. Grants 20 Total Revenues $16.692 Note: tt is estimated that about 60% of the Commercial St. improvements can be assessed to benefitted properties. Only about 40% of the Ash St. improvement can be assessed due to major expenditure on section bridging Fanno Creek Padc 22 Amendment Page No_ 6 401.C Table 9 Projects, Costs & Funding Sources Period: Fiscal Years 2001-2005 (Amounts in Thousands) Proiect/Activity Funding Source Total Cost 1. Ash Avenue - Burnham to Hall Via Scoffins $1,300 Assmts (Phases 11 & 111) 3.300 Tax Increment $ 4,600 2 Building Rehabilitation Assistance 100 Tax Increment 100 3. Greenburg Road Extension 1,500 Tax Increment 1.500 4. Hall Boulevard - Pacific Highway 4.500 Dept. of Transp. to Fanno Creek 1.600 LLO. Assmts 2.400 Tax Increment 8.500 5. Pedestrian Weather Protection 100 Tax Increment 100 6. Public Art 29 Tax Increment 50 Grants & Donations 79 7. Public Parking Faalities 500 Tax Increment 500 Period Total $15,379 *Note: Estimated costs for projects in this period include annual inflation factor of 4% over current year cost estimates. Period 2001-2005 Revenue. Summary Tax Increment Revenues $ 7,929 State DepL of Transportation 4,500 Local Improvement Dists.(LI.D.) Assmts 2,900 Arts Commission & Private Grants for Art 50 $15,379 I 25 E r c T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L MMrI W I+ D ULES - AUGMT 21, 1989 1. ROM GAIL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, Valerie Johnson, and John Schwartz. Staff Present: Pat Reilly, City Administrator; Ken Elliott, Legal Counsel; Ed Murphy, Conmwnity Development Director; Liz Newton, Senior Planner; Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. 2. STUDY SESSICH: a. Waste_shed Yard Debris Information/Discussion Coamunity Development Director introduced Mr. Bill Martin, Recycling Coordinator for Washington County. Mr. Martin reviewed the Yard Debris Recycling Plan developed by representatives of nine cities and Washington County in response to a state. requirement that a cost-effective yard debris program be devised and implemeunted. The objective of the program was.to assure residents of the Washington City Wasteshed that they would have access to yard debris recycling services. The material submitted to council was reviewed by Mr. Martin. It was noted the City would need to negotiate rates with franchise F haulers. The recycling program will be financed through fees charged to the users of the program, or generally to all garbage collection rate payers. t The Department of Environmental Quality has been supportive of efforts to date. There was discussion on the -number and location of the yard debris depots available within the Tigard area.- Five depots- were identified; urban area users would be within four miles of a depot. Mr.. Martin advised the number of depots does not meet the requirements (there should be 11 depots) ; however, hours of operation at the depots have been e5gmrled. He noted that northern Tigard and Garden Hare would only have one-day service within a four-mile radius. i Mr. Martin advised that an education program, teaching people how to use the systems, would be needed. He reviewed the Executive Suunary submitted to Council for their sturdy- Council Minutes - August 21, 1989 - Page 1 i t ~T Mr. Martin advised that MEIM was also developing their program. Councilor Johnson questioned whether once the County bad their program in place if MEIRO's program would affect the cities within the County. Mr. Martin said the County has made it clear they are doing their yard debris program independently from METRO. (Councilor Schwartz arrived at 6:54 p.m.) Discussion followed on the fact that this issue came about because DDQ mandated programs for yard debris recycling be implemented. The program under review represented a cooperative effort between the Washington County and the cities therein. A resolution would be presented to Council on the August 28 agenda which would authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement to implement yard debris recycling with Washington County. This agreement would be submitted to the nine cities involved. Mr. Martin left the meeting at 7:01 p.m. b. Agenda Review: Comam ity Development staff reviewed meeting material submitted to Council for the public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the Ash Avenue Extension and the Tigard/Burnham realignment (Agenda Item No. 4). Senior Planner Newton advised she had had contact with residents from the O'Mara area who wanted the Ash connection to go through. Co mzcil and staff briefly reviewed the Staff Report submitted in the C]ounail packet. Mayor outlined public hearing procedure noting he would request test9mny be limited to 10 minutes per speaker. Business Meeting called to order at 7:30 p.m. 3. VI-SOMM'S ACS a. Brenda Macleod, Coalition for Responsible Prison Siting, advised that materials had been submitted to Couwil, just prior to the business mw. F-t . She noted her caganization. was opposixg the two Washington County prison sites identified. She noted the cities of North Plains, Cornelius, Hi71sh xo, 2nd the Washington County Board of Cosmuissioners also opposed these Saes. The State will be narrowing the list to five finalists on September 1. Caouncil will review the materials submitted and the issue will be discussed further at the August 28, 1989, Co v-U meeting. Council Minutes - August 21, 1989 - Page 2 i 4. 03RT'IlCATICH OF PUBLIC EUMIZEW. - PIAN A CPA 89-06 A--, i AVMUE, SMGARD REALIGNM NP; NPO #1 A recaffuendation by the Planning Conmussion to amend the Transportation Comprehensive Plan Map. The Ash Avenue connection to be modified to indicate a connection from the intersection of SW Walnut and Pacific Highway to Scoffins. An option shall be preserved to connect Ash/Hill to the Ash Street extension with a "T" intersection. The alignment of SW Burnham will be modified to intersect SW Main Street opposite SW Tigard. The realignment of SW Burnham will intersect the existing Burnham right-of-way at a point south of 9185 SW Burnham. The realigned portion will replace the existing portion of Burnham as the minor collector route. LOCATION: ASH AVENUE EXTENSION - between SW Pacific Highway at Walnut and SW Scoffins. (WCIM 2S1 2BD, 2S1 2AC, 2S1 2CA, 2S1 2DB, 2S1 2AD, & 2S1 2AA). BURNHAM/TIGARD REAIXGNM NT - between SW Main Street at Tigard and the existing right-of-ray of SW Bun-Aim Street at a point south of 9185 SW Burnham (WCIM 2S1 2AB & 2S1 2AD). a. Public Hearing Continued from July 10, 1989 b. Staff review by Senior Planner Newton: She referred to maps on display which illustrated the primed street realignments. She described the three facets of the proposal which were the result of transportation planning in the 2-1/2 year process of studying the redevelopment of the City Center. These streets, as proposed, would provide more access points into the city center area without using Pacific Highway or Main Street which were already experiencing capacity difficulty. The new proposals would help to prolong the life of Pacific Highway and help the City establish more of a grid-design traffic system. On August 2, 1989, a joint NPO #1/Neighborhood-meeting was held to discuss the Ash Avenue portion of the proposal; and on August 7, 1989, a meeting was held with several persons concerning the Burnham/Tigard reali.gnment. (See August 14, 1989, memorandum from Edward J. Murphy to Mayor and Council filed in the COUncl.l packet which outlines the discussion at these meetings.) Residents in the Ash Avenue area were concerned about problems created by increased traffic. Business owners in the vicinity of the Burnham/Tigard area were concerned about the cloud on the marketability of their property. Senior Planner Newton noted staff was caxmrried with moving through this process so ideas could progress front the conceptual to the more specific. Questions raised in the meetings brought up other issues which included determining the aligments before amending the maps; reviewing other options besides the three being oonsidered; and leaving the map as is. Out of those options, several sub-options were devised. Council Minutes - August 21, 1989 - Page 3 Y w r ~ oo a r a r ~ ro (t ' a ro a ~ M cu M n ,ti M W fi tci " r 5(D 'D LTI 03 a ' PT 50 R ~ ill d rt (D o a o 0 .r n o ~ ~ ~ M o~na 1~' .a P~. r It ~ ' r ~ cn ~ o 5 it > 0,9 ~ ~ gin ~ ~rt M rt o . ror • V(D cu m ~ m ~a~o m cD the current proposal should be rejected. A more suitable solution would be a further extension of Main Street's west end to serve undeveloped, vacant land. Such a plan could better utilize the existing Johnson-Pacific Highway stop light, and open up the downtown area without affecting as many people's property and lifestyle. councilor Johnson asked if the current members of the NPO understand that the traffic component of the Comprehensive Plan now calls for the Ash Street extension to go straight and over Fanno Creek? Mr. Gott, responded, yes, and that it had been this way for 15 years. o Chuck Woodard, 12490 S.W. Main Street (business), 10215 S.W. Walnut (residence), Tigard, Oregon presented an alternative . proposal to council for the Burnham/Tigard Street realignment. He distributed maps for council review. Mr. Woodard noted he was interested in preserving historic buildings. His proposal included suggestions for stoplights at the railroad intersection and alignment of the street so that . it would travel behind the civic center, through the parking lot onto Hall Boulevard. He described a low profile parking area which could be developed at the civic center. He advised that 30 years ago, the County proposed a road \ extending Walnut Avenue through to Johnson Street. He reviewed a second map which outlined a route which would allow a travel route from Murray Road to Hunziker Street. Mr. Woodard noted concern about a lack of opportunity for citizens to suggest changes which were given serious consideration. o Robert Bell, Bill Webber, and Frances Meyer, members of the Tigard United Methodist Chum Board of Trustees testified: Mr. Bell advised-the Methodist Church had been in its present location for approximately 35 years. This was a growing church in a growing ccumanity; present membership was- appraadmately 500. Attendance in 2989 was 10% over 1988. Approximately 125 parking spaces were needed to adequately serve their congregation; at this tame they have about 100 spaces and were looking to expand their parking area. 4he cmuiecLion of Walnut to Ash would, in all likelihood, eliminate a substantial portion of their parking lot. Mr. Bell advised the parking lot was the lifeblood of the functioning of their ctrw7c h. Without adequate parking, they would lose rem ershi . The church facility was quite lame and a substantial sum of money was needed just to meet ongoing operating expenses; thus, a significant church membership was council Minutes -'August 21, 1989 - Page 5 4 r• r • q RgM4 r 6i~+ nn p ~p w1D M C ~ F• ~ M~ o N • ~ ~ fi~} Fj N W oM r• QQ Q H• O . n a R. N (t u rt W F~• 'tJ nj O O ](4~,. K4 0 Hu P5, H" 9 0 ft (D R O"'F~• to~•+~C M r~•~(~D, w~ ct~r~D ~J M~r iD f~+ 'C (D et I a r £ r ~ ►J o M r a co N. N a t (D o ro 5 a H (~D 5 O ~ tR ~C f]~ 0 ro ro sv iD • (D. ro a ~S I-' 016 0 fD Ln M n (D I-J tD (D 'C P~ M M Councilor Johnson discussed with the church representatives the amount of available vacant land the church could utilize for expansion. Land was limited because of adjacent wetland area. Mr. Webber said they would not want to use parking spaces across the street or on-street parking spaces. Mayor Fdwards noted the growth which has occurred around the church. He asked if the church, with all of the activities and expansion of usage, had ever given consideration to relocating to a more accessible location which would also have expansion possibilities. Mr. Webber responded they have been at this location since the mid-501s; the problem would be to find a suitable location. They were further constrained because there were Methodist churches in Tualatin, Sherwood, Newberg, Metzger, Garden Home; so there were not too many places suitable for relocation. Other alternatives might be to expand to two services instead of one. Councilor Johnson thanked the representatives for the ccm=Hiity service provided by their facility. o Gloria Johnson, 9300 S.W. Hill Street, Tigard, Oregon 9:-*i23, read her testimony from her August 21, 1989 letter to Mayor and Council. (Letter is filed with council packet material.) She noted she felt the proposed --?A would negatively impact the neighborhood by encouraging increased traffic. o Ken Allison, 11830 S.W. Wildwood, Tigard, Oregon, advised he owned the Pacific Village Apartments at 9655 S.W. McKenzie. These apartments appeared to him to be in the way of the connection of Walnut and Ash Street. ' He said he agreed with the church representatives and an alternative alignment should be considered. He advised he attended the IPO meeting and also agreed with the testimony, of the IPO Chair. He noted he attended the first Council meeting where he did not hear one person in favor of the proposal. He questioned whether people in Tigard were ready to spend the amount of money necessary to implement the proposal. o Gregg Davidson - declined to testify. o Jeff Graham, 13290 S.W. Ash Drive, Tigard, Oregon, noted the following points: C =Y--Il directed, at the last public hearing, that a staff/neighborhood meeting be held. He noted, as a general observation, these types of meetings often turn into an adversarial format with two sides presenting their positions. He said he felt that ideas, like those from Chuck Woodard were not being heard; although he said his remarks should be Council Minutes - August 21, 1989 - Page 7 ...r.•:J~•.~......~: •...Y ~,Y.l1l v.. .sM.t iff~lS.Y~)lsY..~..Y.. ~ r • 0 b f~ r°n0 v~' MM N ~ E a !D fDro f~-+~ ~i (xD M5 (D D (D U, Rip N ofi i rt F-+ N ro gg N M o M ►y+ F~• rt rt n - ro co (A ~ n `0 ~RH-14 co (D rt H rr OR 5 A 14D ~-j I R RD et R rr (D ~ o y, u. ~ ~ n x b7i a ~ ;1 0 ro (D rt a rt rt to R• . ~ 5(D it 0. M 4 si ~ R ~ n c~ • ~ b ro }gyp m b ~ ~ a .5 -03 He noted that several years ago a shopping center was proposed for the area at Pacific Highway and Main street; the plans called for the extension of Ash Street in accordance with the existing Comprehensive Plan. At that time, it was decided this would not be a good idea. Mr. Kittelson reviewed overhead projector slides which outlined what existing conditions were, what future projected needs were, and a view of the road system from a regional perspective. By the year 2005, traffic volume in the downtown area would triple. Additional entry portals must be provided to handle the volume. The following criteria was established: At least one more railroad crossing should be developed. The railroad was currently serving as a barrier to traffic moving through the downtown area. Unless there was another crossing of the railroad, all of the traffic would remain focused on 99W and Main Street. Main Street does not have the capacity to handle the traffic. - There was a need to create new entry portals into the downtown area. Increasing the capacity of Main Street at either terminus should be avoided, because it would create a bottleneck inside the City. Main Street would not have the capacity to handle increased traffic even if it was pushed through the portals. Mr Kittelson advised the Plan represented a system-wide concept which begins to address the distribution pattenls which have been experienced and were projected to continue in the future. The idea of the Plan was not to 'reroute regional traffic through the downtown area, but to provide locally destined traffic with an alternative to the regional routes in order to get da4itown. With regard to the Ash Street eomzection: 1) The proposed roadway aligrnment and the operating characteristics of the Walnut to Htinziker extension would not encourage through-traffic use. 2) The proposed roadway design directs traffic away from the residential portion of Ash Street. - Council Minutes - August 21, 1989 - Page 9 3) Numerous alternatives would be available to protect the residential area from additional through traffic. In response to a question from councilor Schwartz with regard to Mr. Woodard's suggestion for a Johnson Street alignment, Mr. Kittelson identified the following problems: - This would create a five-legged intersection which presents safety concerns and reduces capacity. - This would eliminate an entry portal to the downtown area (a primary objective). - This would move capacity problems to the interior of the city. d. Recommendation by Cm=Z ty Development Director: He reviewed the necessity for the iuVrovements to assist in the creation of a viable downtown. The City Center Plan Task Force had reviewed the transportation issues extensively with a professional consultant and made this recmmendation originally. . Connunity Development Director recommended the Council uphold the Planning Commission's ration and approve the primed Couprehensive Plan, Amendments. In addition, he suggested an analysis be authorized by Council which would determine the exact location of the road alignments. e. Mayor read the following written testimony into the record: - August 16, 1989, letter from Catherine King, 13205 S.W. Ash Avenue, Tigard, Oregon. (letter is on file with the meeting packet material-) - July 26, 1989, letter from Mr. & Mrs. Robert Ste9nborn, 9560 S.W. FSrewing Court, Tigard, Oregon. (Letter is on file with the meeting packet material.) f. Public Hearing was closed. g. Camci.l cc mients Each Cav=il member noted the need for the prgp ed Coalx~ive Plan Amendments for the benefit of the eoamunity as a whole. Council acknowledged the concerns of r business and property owners who would potentially be affected. The need to protect the right-of-bray for the future was discussed. Mayor expressed concerns over timing. After lengthy discussion, Council consensus was that a detailed design specification should be developed as soon as possible so people in the area would know if, or haw, their property would be affected. Council Minutes - August 21, 1989 - Page 10 i i 1 , h. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Mayor Rhrdrds, to uphold the Planning Canm ssion recoflmTendatlon directing staff to prepare a Final order for the adoption of the Coanprehensive Plan Amendments creating the concept of the walnut to Ash connection and eventually on through to Hall Street to Hunziker; and the Tigard/Burnham realignment. It was further directed that staff simultaneously submit with the Final order, the cost and time estimates for preliminary engineering to determine exact details of both design changes. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. Recess Council Meeting Convene Incal Contract Review Board 5. IOCAL C7MUEMCT REVIEW BOAR (III ) a. Present: President Jerry Wwards; Board Members Carolyn Eadon, Valerie Johnson, and John Schwartz. b. Bid Award Reomoendation for Pffafle Street Improvements Project- City Engineer noted staff was recommending bid award to Oregon Asphaltic Paving, Portland, in the amount of•$136,570. He advised this amount was within the budget and engineer's estimate. _ c. Motion by Board member Schwartz, seconded by Board member Johnson, to award the bid to the low bidder Oregon Asphaltic Paving, in the amount of $136,570. The motion was approved by a-unanimous vote of the Board present. d. LCRB meeting was adjourned. Council meeting reconvened. 6. NOtf-AGEND& lam: None 7. S1mY SES.QCN IMC~ (continued) : a. Comnnuty Developwmt Director reviewed a recent decision-made by the Planning fission which could have the potential of affecting the overall street inlarovement policy. (See August 21, 1989, mennararidum. freer Com inity Development Director which has been filed with the Com cil packet material.) After discussion, council consensus was that the Planning Caamnission should be sent a letter outlining their role in deciding on deferments on street improvements. Council Minutes - August 21, 1989 - Page 11 b. Ca mnznity Develcpmrct Director updated Council on an issue dealing with the placement of a mobile home on a single-family lot of record. He reviewed the criteria which ma=st be met. If the Director's Decision was appealed on this issue, the issue would be heard by the Planning Cmnission unless called-up by the council. 8. EXBCUTVE SMUCN: Cancelled. 9- _ 10:28 p.m. APPPUM by the Tigard City Council on , 1989. City Recorder - City of Tigard t r ATTEST: Mayor - City of Tigard cw. cK=021 i f f t 1 r f E i . y. Council minutes - August 21, 1,989 - Page 12 iif=~ NENDRANDM CITY OF TIGARD, OREMN TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council nd By FROM: Patrick J. Reilly, City Administrato For Your Information DATE: September 28, 1989 -Sign and Return SUBJECT: COUNCIL CALEMAR, Sep. - Dec. 1989 Official Council meetings are marked vT?th an asterisk If generally OK, we can proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars. October '89 *9, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) (Economic Development Committee) ~ 10, Tues Town Hall Meeting - City Center Development Plan- Twality Jr. High - Lecture/Multi-Purpose Room (7:00- 9:00 pm) 1 11, Weds Town Hall Meeting - City Center Development Plan - Fowler Jr. High - Forum Rom (7:00 - 9:00 pm) *16, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) (Tigard School District) 18, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 am) Ballots for 11/7 Election Scheduled for Mail-Out by Washington County Elections Division i *23, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) (Wa. Co. Commissioner Ray Rogers) 24, Tues Joint Council Meeting with City of Lake Oswego; Location and Time to be Announced 31, Tues Halloween I November '89 *6, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) (Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue) 7, Tues Election 11-14, Sat-trues League of Oregon Cities Annual Conference, Eugene, *13, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) (Sen. Paul Phillips) 15, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 am) j *20, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30) (Utilities & Franchise) 23-24, Thurs-Fri Thanksgiving Holiday (City Hall Closed) 25-29, Sat-Wed National League of Cities Conference December 189 ? Annual Tree Lighting Event *11 Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) (Library Board) *18, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) (Transportation Advisory Committee) 20, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmex's, 7:15 am) 25, Mon Christmas Holiday (City Hall Closed) cw/cccal Council Calendar - Page 1 S T A T E NT OF VOTES C AST /~PageO 14:18:20 3ep-1989 t} SEPTEMBER SPECIAL ELECTION, 9 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON / .,:a ` .v. #34-1 6 NO CITY OF TIGARD 7 Overvotes 5-YR PARK LEVY 8 Undervotes 1 YES #34-2 r. 2 NO TIGARD SCH DIST 3 Overvotes LEVY FOR NEW SCHOOLS & RENOVATION i.;`i\,y• 4 Undervotes 9 YES #5-2 10 NO 'f SCAPPOOSE SCHOOL DISTRICT 11 Overvotes OPERATING LEVY 12 Undervotes 5 YES 1......2......3......4 5......6......7......8 9.....10.....11.....12 0001 0001 TUALATIN E 5 2 0 0 0004 0004 TUAL COUNC 108 29 0 2 t 0005 0005 TOWN HALL 313 239 0 22 0007 0007 DURHAM SCH 195 91 0 4 0009 0009 CHRIST KIN 341 319 0 16 0015 0015 METZGER PK . . 154....132......0.....11 0016 0016 METZGER EL 150 225 0 8 199 176 O 8 0017 0017 METZGER ME 46 57 0 3 t 0016 0018 EDWARD BYR 415 163 O 6 0024 0024 TUAL COMM 301 210 1 6 0025 0025 K CITY TOW 217 258 0 16 0027 0027 METZGER PK . . . 99....153......0.....11 0028 0028 FOWLER JR 173 143 0 8 0029 0029 EDWARD BYR 541 207 0 4 0030 0030 TIGARD CUM 189 202 1 6 200 191 1 6 0031 0031 C F TIGARD 258 229 2 9 294 196 2 6 0032 0032 C F TIGARD 252 241 O 7 288 203 0 9 0033 0033 FOWLER JR . 245....227......0...... 6 . . 267....207...... 1......3 0034 0034 JAMES TEMP 239 220 0 9 269 189 O 10 0035 0035 PHIL LEWIS 114 150 1 5 141 125 0 4 0036 0036 TUAL CITY 241 67 0 4 0038 0038 ELDORADO V 193 178 0 15 0039 0039 TUALATIN E 16 14 0 0 0040 0040 TWALITY JR . 255....231......0......6 . . 270....209......0..... 13 0041 0041 SUMMERFIEL 306 360 1 30 365 292 0 40 0043 0043 ROYAL VILL 91 122 1 10 t 0046 0046 M WOODWARD 193 84 0 2 0137 0137 DIXIE MT G 5 14 0 0 0165 0165 KINTON GRA 10 37 0 3 t 0180 0180 SUMMERFIEL . 223....317......0..... 15 . . 264.... 270......0..... 21 0183 0183 TUAL COMM 19 40 0 2 0185 0185 PIPERS RUN 38 10 0 1 t 0186 0186 PIPERS RUN 0 2 0 0 0187 0187 PIPERS RUN 2 8 0 0 0189 0189 TUALATIN E 130 37 0 4 0191 0191 MAISON ARM . . . 11......9......0......0 0192 0192 MAISON ARM 61 84 0 6 84 61 1 5 0194 0194 TIGARD CUM 85 121 O 8 97 112 0 5 0195 0195 USA DURHAM 259 167 0 5 270 155 1 5 0213 0213 EDWARD BYR 204 88 0 8 0215 0215 CF TIGARD 165 177 0 4 179 160 0 7 1 0217 0217 METZGER EL . 43.....65......0...... 4 . . 50.....46......0......4 t i t ~ S T A TPo*~ E N T O F V 0 T E S C A S T Page 2- 14:18:22 .-Sep-1989 SEPTEMBER SPECIAL ELECTION, 9 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 834-1 6 NO CITY OF TIGARD 7 Overvotes 5-YR PARK LEVY 8 Undervotes 1 YES H34-2 2 NO TIGARD SCH DIST 3 Overvotes LEVY FOR NEW SCHOOLS & RENOVATION 4 Undervotes 9 YES #5-2 10 NO d SCAPPOOSE SCHOOL DISTRICT 11 Overvotes OPERATING LEVY 12 Undervotes 5 YES 1......2......3......4 5......6......7......8 9..... 10..... 11..... 12 0218 0218 M WOODWARD 1 5 0 0 t 0221 0221 M WOODWARD 240 73 0 2 0224 0224 FOWLER JR 67 68 0 4 78 75 1 5 0225 0225 SUMMERFIEL 181 133 O 3 167 147 0 3 0226 0226 M WOODWARD 261 63 0 1 TOTAL 3,806..3,437 5.... 140. 5..... 14...... 0...... 0 7,346..5,434 9.... 310 t i t t i i z t 1 t i , t 1 3 1 ' CITY OF TIGARD, OPMON COUNCIL AGENDA TTE24 SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 9, 1989 DATE SUBMIT D: _September 25, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Video Poker PREVIOUS ACTION: None Machines A-i 1 PRFPARED BY: Ron Goodeaster, Chief DEPT HEAD OK CI'T'Y AEKM OK REQUESTED BY: POLL ISSUE Should the City Council allow the Oregon State Lottery C,oumiission to use the City of Tigard as a video gambling location? INFORMATION SUMMARY A recent change in the law allows video poker games, administered by the Lottery Ccamnission, that would pay off. The Caamnission is studying the implementing of the new game in the Portland Metropolitan Area. The Police Department is opposed to this gambling expansion and recce mnends against approval. Informational memo attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERID 1. Outlaw all video gambling devices. 2. Allow the Lottery Ccemmission to install video gambling machines in the City of Tigard. 3. Not allow the Lottery Cmnission to install video gambling machines in the City of Tigard. 4. Status quo. FISCAL IMACT If the Comtis-sion's video poker games are allowed, it could easily result in an additional workload that the Department would have great difficulty in meeting without additional resources. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the proposed Resolution. cp/RDGVIDEID N:\WORD\POLSCE\ NMRANDLE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Ta: Mayor and City Council through Respond By Patrick J. Reilly, City Administrator FRC14: Ronald D. Goodpaster, Chief of Police\ -For Your Information DATE: September 22, 1989 -Sign and Return S[JBJEC'T: Video Poker Machines The Oregon Legislature passed a new law that would allow video lottery games. The Oregon State Lottery Ccumission has been given the responsibility of acbuxuztering the new law and is in the process of developing and implementing a new video based game commonly known as "Video Poker." To implement the game, the Commission has divided the state into two regions for market testing purposes. The lottery's objective is to first test the game in the Portland metropolitan area including Multnomah, Clackamas, and Washington Counties. I am opposed to this expansion of gambling and recommend that the City Council advise the Oregon State Lottery Cou nission that it does not want the Commission to include the City of Tigard as a video poker site. My opposition is based on law enforcement concerns and I join other law enforcement officials throughout the state, in my opposition, to the new video poker game. By allowing this game into our community, I feel we are inviting more eomplaints*for the Police to investigate, an increase in criminal activity, and the furtherance of social and financial problems among individuals. I am also concerned that these games will be frequently played in establislmments where alcohol is consumed. Unlike scene counties and cities, the City of Tigard currently allows video poker machines which do not pay off. By adding the Commissions video poker machines that have a pay off next to the existing machines will create additional problems. The City currently has approximately 14 video poker machines and has not received any complaints of pay offs. The City should not have both types of video poker games. Gambling investigations are extremely time consuming and costly for law enforcement. The last gcrTibling violations, I was personally involved in investigating, had to do with payoffs to video poker machines. Recently, the City of Newberg concluded an exhaustive multi-agency gambling investigation on racketeering and gambling changes involving payoffs on video poker games. Most recently, in the City of IaGrande and in Baker and Union Counties, 45 Police Officers from a variety of state and local law enforcement agencies executed numerous search warrants and seized at least 40 video poker machines. This was the result of civil racketeering law suits that vere filed against prominent LaGrande businessmen who were identified as video poker distributors and were accused of violating the states gambling and racketeering laws. video poker machines generate large volumes of cash and any time you have large amounts of cash around, it is susceptible to the traditional organized crime influence. Jurisdictions around us have already voiced their concerns and opposition to the Comission regarding the new video poker game. I believe that if we allow this new game, we would attract an element into Tigard that may create additional problems for our Police Department and our ccatm mity. I recoanwnd you advise the Oregon Lottery Cmmu ssion that the City of Tigard does not want the Commission's video poker game and adopt the attached Resolution. If you have any questions concerning this, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. cp/RDGMEO N:\WORD\POLICE\ C 1 , GL F } CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON C" COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY - LCRB AGENDA OF: October 91 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: September 22, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Bid Award For PREVIOUS ACTION: Janitorial services 14 PREPARED BY: Community Development DEPT HEAD O CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE r Shall the Local Contract Review Board award the bid for janitorial services of i the Civic Center, Annex, and Field Services. INFORMATION SUMMARY Bids were opened for the Civic Center Janitorial Services on September 15, 1989 at 2:00 P.M. Three bids were received as follows: 1. Service Master $27,084.00 - $30,090.00 { 2. American Building Maintenance $41,853.89 (Bid price is good only for 12 months). r; 3. ITEC Maintenance System Bid Rejected (Bid specifications not signed). ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Award bid to Service Master, the lowest qualified bidder. 2. Request staff change bids specifications and reopen the bids. r ____=====c=v==e=cc==c=====-------=====coov=====c====cc===c=c========c====c=c== k FISCAL IMPACT Budgeted for FY 89/90 is $30,000, or $2500/month. The Service Master bid ranges from $27,084 to $30,000/year (dependant on the impact of a potential increase in the minimum wage), or $2,257.00 to $2,507.00 per month. i SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that City Council award the bid to Service Master for the above costs. l i br/Janitor z Ll 2-1,6 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY - LCRB AGENDA OF: October 9. 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: September 27, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Bid Award For PREVIOUS ACTION: Crack Sealer PREPARED BY: Community Development DEPT HEAD O ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Should the Local Contract Review Board award the bid for a new Crack Sealer to be used as part of the pavement management program? The new crack sealer will allow the City to at least triple the amount of crack sealing done within a given amount of time. Preventative crack sealing will reduce the cost of asphalt repairs and extend the life of city streets. The new unit will also improve the efficiency and safety of the streets crew. INFORMATION SUMMARY i Bids were opened for the Crack Sealer on September 15, 1989 at 2:00 P.M. Four bids were received as follows: 1. Sahlberg Equipment* $16,688.00 (5 exceptions to the bid specs were made. **Their bid called for a single axle unit.) 2. Special Asphalt Products $16.710.00 (7 exceptions to the bid specs were made. **Their bid called for a single axle unit.) 3. Albina Asphalt $18,452.00 (1 exception which is a minor issue to change a ball hitch. **Their bid called for a double axle unit.) 4. Sahlberg Equipment* $19,799.00 (7 exceptions to the bid specs were made. **Their bid called for a double axle unit.) *Sahlberg Equipment submitted to bids for two of their models. **The bid specs called for a double axle unit. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED I- t F. 1. Award the bid to Albina Asphalt in the amount of $18,452.00. Their bid was r the lowest of the two bids which met the double axle bid spec, considered to be a very important specification in terms of safety and handling. Their bid also had only one minor exception. E r 2. Award the bid to Sahlberg Equipment, which was the lowest bid received. Their bid is $1,764.00 less than Albina•s, but it has several exceptions to the bid specifications, including that it is a single axle unit. 3. Change the specifications and re-advertise for bids. t a 4. Reject all bids and take no further action at this time. FISCAL IMPACT The 1989/90 budgeted amount for the crack sealer is $25,000. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that Council award the bid to Albina Asphalt in the amount of $18,452.00. The difference between the single axle unit and the double axle unit is considered significant enough to warrant the extra cost involved. br/Sealer 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON j COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SL14MARY AGENDA OF: October 9. 1989 DATE SUEMII'ITED: September 29, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TIME: Aporove Criteria PREVIOUS ACTION: for Evaluation of City Administrator. ZLdL PREPARED BY: Cathy Wheatley DEPT HEAD OK CITY ALAN OK RDQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE I Review of Council policy directives for the evaluation of the City Administrator. INFORMATION SC4'MARY i Public meeting statutes provide that the evaluation of the chief executive officer by the governing body may be conducted during Executive Session. The standards, criteria, and policy directives to be used in evaluating the chief executive officer shall be adopted by the governing body in a meeting open to the public in which there has been opportunity for public cent. I ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached criteria. 2. Approve the attached criteria with amendments. FISCAL IMPACT N/A SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the attached criteria. cw. eval CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON i CITY AIMI1,iISTRATOR EVA11WION Instructions: Place a check mark on the line underneath the rating column which you feel is appropriate. a v !r O L 44 ryu v o° u B y ti ~ Wro °J 'v 'o ro 1. Public Relations A. Projects a positive image B. Is courteous to public at all times C. Keeps commitments to the public and city officials D. Seeks to use criticism of self and city in positive ways E. Maintains effective relations with media representatives During the past year has: Improved ( ) Remained about the same ( ) Declined ( ) Comments: ~7 d n oo ~ N ~ . 12 (~pp ((pp a - o~ n O c rt 0 V ~ 15 U) n - w I VD °z xcellent very GOod O v GoOd • Satisfactory Needs IProveme nt Unsatis• factory CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON f CITY ADMINISTRATOR EVAIMION Instructions: Place a check mark on the line underneath the rating column which you feel is appropriate. C o JL4 c [ u 0 ro H co t 0 o •.y~ t 3. City Council Relationships ^r o wkv a~' co ~ro ~ A. Effectively implements policies and programs approved by City Council in timely manner I B. Reporting to City Council is timely, clear, concise, and thorough r C. Accepts direction or instructions in a positive manner i D. Effectively aids the City Council in establishing long-range goals E. Keeps Council informed of current plans and activities of administration and new developments in technology, legislation, governmental practices, etc. F. Does not attempt to set City policy in situations where it is more appropriate for City Council decisions G. When appropriate, City Council is provided i with realistic options and alternatives H. Provides information to City Council with enough lead time so Council is not forced by deadlines to make decisions before it is ready to do so f During the past year has: Improved ( ) Remained about the same ( ) Declined ( ) Ca mr ents: % CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON l CITY ADMI14ISIRRATOR EVALUATION Instructions: Place a check mark on the line underneath the rating column which you feel is appropriate. L C l~ b o u o u ~ CO v~ ^p •.y b m 4. Leadership and Decision Making wk c° z CO ~A. Clearly accepts appropriate responsibility for mistakes and errors made by the City B. Maintains effective relations with other local governments C. Effectively seeks to correct mistakes and errors made by the City D. Maintain composure in stressful situations E. Is seen by average citizen as a good administrator F. Keeps commitments to citizens G. Is acceptable to the public H. Responds to citizens who carne to him/hex with problems in effective ways I. Decisions reflect good judgement J. Applies laws and regulations fairly and with proper discretion During the past year has: Improved ( ) Remained about the same ( ) Declined ( ) Comments: c~ bd ~0' cn . '~8'P- 0 . RD 8 n . . a j- Ft w~ 80 H~ o (CD' o ft z z 5 Excellent very food rt Good. satisfactory S Needs X Provement unsatis factory CITY OF TIGARD, ORDGON CITY ADN=STRATOR EVALUATION Instructions: Place a check mark on the line underneath the rating column which you feel is appropriate. 4 f3 Fa ti 7~1 O O O X4 V u .b ~ W v O ro S y O H ,~y V' y tq i 6. Personal Traits Ali, v o Z U A. Controls emotions effectively in difficult situations B. Uses common sense C. Is flexible in accepting and adjusting to change D. Has positive attitude E. Demonstrates personal honesty and frankness in day-to-day relationships F. Completes work in acceptable time periods G. Achieves goals set by or in conjunction with City Council During the past year has: Improved ( ) Remained about the same ( ) Declined ( ) Comments: d CZ bd ~ J M i Fl' ro D w w m ~ o c1 z ' Exce1jent N ver CO d rt ° H COOd. Satisfactor g Y Needs Im Provement Unsatis factory ~QC G NMI CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 9, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: October 3, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW 135th Ave. ' PREVIOUS ACTION: LID settin the date of final -hearing PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole DEPT HEAD OK%N CITY ADMIN O REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Setting the date for final hearing on SW 135th Avenue Local Improvement District (LID). INFORMATION SUMMARY 3 All work is complete on the SW 135th Avenue LID. In order to close the LID, it is necessary for the Council to formally accept the final report and to set a date for a hearing to consider any objections to the final assessment roll. Staff recommends that the hearing be set for the regular Council business mEP::ing of October 23, 1989. The final engineer's report is attached. t The costs of construction are less than had been estimated in 1987. However, ! i financing costs are greater than had been estimated. As a result, final project costs are approximately 3% higher than estimated in 1987. I. Financing costs are higher for two reasons. First, it was necessary to keep the LID open longer than originally anticipated in order to resolve all right-of-way issues. Second, the 1987 estimates did not anticipate all of the costs associated with the sale of Bancroft bonds. At the time of LID formation, Council directed that costs of bridge construction at Summer Creek would be funded from the Streets CIP budget. In 1988, the Council additionally directed that the Streets CIP would pay up to 50% of the remaining project costs, not to exceed $560,000. After subtracting these CIP contributions, the final LID cost is $597,668.65 for design and construction. An additional $18,438.33 was expended for acquisition of right-of-way from property owners who chose not to donate. The total final LID cost is $616,106.98. The resulting final assessment on a typical subdivision lot is $532.85, which is approximately 53% of the original estimated assessment of $998. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached resolution accepting the final report and assessment roll; setting a hearing for October 23, 1989, and directing that notice of the hearing be given. r 2. Direct that revisions be made to the report or to the assessment roll. FISCAL IMPACT Costs are funded by the LID and Streets CIP, as previously budgeted. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution. R1-135.RW g 4805 S.W. Griffith Drive, Beaverton, OR 97005 Robert E. Wveyer Consultants, inc. (503) 643.7531 October 2, 1989 1548-01-60 Randall R. Wooley, P.E. City Engineer City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Final Engineer's Report For S.W. 135th Avenue LID Street Improvement Project Mr. Wooley, This report includes a project summary, the final assessment roll, and maps updated to show new lots within the Local Improvement District (LID). BACKGROUND- The S.W. 135th Avenue LID was formed in September 1987, by Ordinance No. 87-51. The ordinance ordered the construction of street improvements in accordance with the preliminary engineer's report, directed request of bid proposals, and set forth the method of assessment and method of financing. CONSTRUCTION - i Improvements for S.W. 135th Avenue were constructed with the bridge alternative at i Summer Creek in accordance with the preliminary engineer's report. Construction was performed by Dirt & Aggregate Interchange, Inc. and was completed in July 1989. FINAL COSTS - The final costs of the project are as follows: BASIC LID COST RIGHT-OF-WAY COST TOTAL COST Construction $ 994,614.63 $ 0.00 $ 994,614.63 Engineering & Inspection 229,225.01 0.00 229,225.01 Right-of-Way 4,946.67 18,438.33 23,385.00 Administration 9,789.61 0.00 9,789.61 Financing Costs 70,790.94 0.00 70,790.94 Total Cost $ 1,309,366.86 $ 18,438.33 $ 1,327,805.19 Less Bridge Costs (151,698.21) 0.00 (151,698.21) Subtotal $ 1,157,668.65 $ 18,438.33 $ 1,176,106.98 Less C.I.P. Share (560,000.00) 0.00 (560,000.00) Net LID Share $ 597,668.65 $ 18,438.33 $ 616,106.98 Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Landscape Architecture Randall R. Wooley, P.E. City of Tigard October 2, 1989 Page 2 of 2 FINAL ASSESSMENT- Final assessments have been computed in accordance with Ordinance No. 87-51, on the basis of trip generation potential. The assessment roll includes a total of 507 benefited tax lots, current as of the date of this report. The increase in number of benefited properties over the 436 referenced in Ordinance No. 87-51 is due to the partitioning of lots that has occurred within the LID boundary. Assessments are based upon the net basic LID share ($597,668.65) plus applicable right-of-way costs. Those properties not meeting exemption requirements were assessed right-of-way costs in accordance with the ordinance. Assessments are lower than originally estimated due to the City's participation in project funding. The final assessment for a typical single-family lot is $532.85. Working with you and the City staff has been a pleasure and we have appreciated the opportunity to assist the City in completing this project. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ROBERT E. MEYER CONSULTANTS, INC. David H. Sandstrom, P.E. Civil Engineering Manager DHS:fr Enclosures VOOM off! 'V .2 1989 1548'~l'60 Tota► wwvt.o(~L a) Assessment MFN'v pto Basic Assessment tsl . L'S LASS percentof Assessment ts) 0.00 r'INA Trips Total tSl 0.00 A Li' L.l.v• GNU V Address Gen. 0.00 138,755.44 S w,135`r .00000 0 0 CITY OF TIG 'j) Last Na FirstName 0 0.0rne d 138:155'44 0.00 tNo. 11493 Sa • W p119 Allen 1266 Blv 23.20442 0.00 LID NO. Map&Te `t.o Burton E. portlan 2604 D.0 Grabhorl • 00 11080 S• OR 81005 0.40000 10,110•36 1 1S133AC 080 Beaver' on, 0 0.00 1- of 3397 133DB 04300 pre~on Y .O. BOY' - 91223 201 1.19112 10$11g.36 0.00 10:331.40 1-2 ISTlg rd I OR Cit S.W .135th St' 10,331.40 40101 & 11035 9g223 1.g2815 1S133DB Tigard Tigard, OR 194 1-3 Daniel G• ve• #2800 0.00 Duggan Judith A• 111 S. 'w • 5th A 00 er 0,00 1S133CN 002 Attn. T•3• Ke 91204 0.00 2 0058.53 p?I p ortland, O 40900 nflower 0 ,00000 3 0.00 81 A 8,058.5 3 1S133C Su L1mited p.0• Box 23391 91223 488 10s3g0.68 10 Inc. Tigard, OR 110 1.5 0,00 15 S.W. 135th Aye' 10,390.68 q 10 195 1.13166 0.00 2'55 33CA 00400 Tigard 111ard: OR 91223' 4 1S1 Gary R• Tig view Blvd. 551.10 S.W . ? air 2, 5 X168.61 00300 C°e & 2955 OR 81201 48 0.42113 5 1S133CA ene 1. Portland, Ave 0.00 A 001 ?ul Q Aleen Gross 11295 S•~R19Z2 3 • 5:168.61 00 ° 0,86431 6 1S133C Gary R• & Tigard, #2800 91 Nelson patsy A• W 5th Ave' 18,891.51 1S133CA 00500 At n. T.3.ORm9 204 16, 51 0.00 1 891• pFI Portland, 2,82481 00800 Sunflower 311 8 1S133CA lied 135th Ave- 5,W. L1m 11295 •91223 Inc. Gary R• & Tigard, OR 00100 Nelson patsy A' 8 1S133CA 3 Cogs 2198`~ OCT. -0019011, vim: 41.60 Total ~4S- Bight of V2a5 Assessment mpowl- 4. MORI SEgSA'IENT ROLL A Bessm Ass. (5ment t51 00 lI~1 FINAL A percentof eni S Tr`ps Total tSl 0 38:631.96 L•Y;D' N Gen. D S,W.135Tx AVE Address 38,631.9 0.4 Y OF TIGAR First Name ak Ct. 725 6.46052 CIT LastNan1e u,Cky O 532.85 Map&TaxLotNo. 10930 L CA 9501 0.00 Cupertino, LIDNo' Sunflower 0,08911 532.85 532.85 04100 Associates L 11 1S133CD Swendon QOp 10 532.85 0.00 LTD 11Z 24 S.W . 97223 532.85 partnersY►ip & Tigard, OR 10 0.08911 0.00 Karold R' 11. LpOp 532.85 gearns Elisabeth 4 S-W. Swendon 08911 532.85 24 04300 & 1172 OR 972 14 0. 13 1S133CD Mark M• Tigard, 8 0.00 Thomas Leslie L• S.E. 27th, N°' 532.85 532.85 D 00400 1447 91214 0.08911 14 1S133C Clarissa L. Portland, OR Lo©p 10 0.40 W. Swendon 532.85 1S133CD 04544 Litteer 11732 S• 97223 0.08911 on Loop 10 532.85 15 Keitlt A• & Tigard, OR wildermuth Deanna M• W. Swend 0.00 00604 11736 S• 97223 532.85 16 1S133CD Clarence K' & Tigard, OR 0.08911 532.85 0.00 Baker Kathleen M• wendon Loop 10 532.85 3CD 40740 Brown S 532.85 1S13 11140S- W' 97223 0.08911 17 Marcus Samuel Tigard, OR. Swendon Loop 10 532.85 0.00 00800 Nitsos 11744 S•OR g7223 0.08911 532.85 18 1S133CD Martha N. Tigard, Swendon 1,00P 10 532.85 0.00 00900 Murphy 11748 S•OR 97223 0 532.85 0.00 1S135CD ard, 14 .08911 19 Mark R• T18 Loop •Swendon 532.85 01000 Paulin Tiffany A' 11152 S• W OR n91223don 532.85 4.48911 0.00 20 16133CD Roy N. & Tigard, Loop 10 532 B5 S. 01100 B°Yd Barbara 11756 •W• 97? Swe23 0.48911 21 1S133CD Daniel C. & Tigard, OR L°°p 10 Wells Debra A• 2120 S•W• Swendon 22 1S133CD 41244 1Vlaxim° E' & 1Tigard, OR 97223 01300 Angeles Socorro G. 23 15133CD Impopm- wwl~ "Mm goo OCT.2 1999 . +91 154$-0 roo Total Vi wy ftight,oS* Assessment SENT kj OLi' Basle AAysessment (S) loom FINAL ASSES Trip PercentoS Arse t5ment (s) 532.85 Trips Total 0,00 L U D • Gen 532.85 Address 0,08g11 532.85 Sw.135TH AVENE CITY OF TIGA 'D glrstrat"e nd°n 1,001P 10 532. 85 0.00 Lastl`lan1e W. Swe Mapg~TOLotho. 11862 S'OR 99223 0.08911 532.85 p 00 yADro. Billy E•H Tigard' Swendon Loop 1 532.85 Z. CD 41400 Bates 3udith 11X64 S•OR 88223 0.08911 532.85 24 op 10 0•p4 16133 area L• Tigard' • S endon 532.85 01580 McLeod K 11266 S'Wg7223 L° 0.08911 532.85 25 1S133CD TL. & Tigard: OR end Loop 10 0.04 l on Ear ,W. SW 532.85 01600 lJoar Diana L• 11168 SOR g7223 0,4$911 33CD ard, 0 1S1 532.85 26 Marilyn Y' & Tig endon Loop 14 2.8 0.0 3anles M• W' Sw 53 5 5133CD 01140 Rider 11114 S'Olt gg223 0.08911 532.85 27 1 Barbara Sean Tigard, endon Loop 10 532.85 0.00 Brophy 12300 5-'W' SS g223 0.08911 532.85 15133CD 01800 A• & Tigard, OR 10 85 8.04 28 Mark 64th 532• 4001 S.E• R 99206 0.08911 532.85 CD 019p0 Rust Merri113• O "S-133 an Portland, 10 0.44 29 sus W. Swendon Loop 532.85 02400 Allen 11182 S•Og 91223 o.g8911 532.85 1.513 CD Thomas D. & Tigard, on Loop 10 0.00 30 S•W • Swend 532.85 02100 gerberger Beverly A' 111g6 OR 97223 8.08911 532.85 1S133CD II Thomas G• Tigard, Loop 14 532 0•q0 31 SIN • Swendon . 85 D 02200 Drakeley 11090 q.p8911 $32.85 & OR 91223 0 00 32 1S133C Michael W • Tigard, n 1,00P 1 85 4• 532• 2.85 G erking Gregory G* W , Sw end 02340 11194 S.OR gg223 0.08911 53 33 1S133CD llehard T. 8t Tigard, Loop 18 4.00 Maughan W. Swendon 532.85 Carolyn M• 4 1S133CD 42404 Sohn R. be Tigard, •OR 9Z223rry 14 500 0.08911 3 Manning Mary C. 13845 S'W • Ashbu 02 35 1S133CD David R• Lane 94223 Ertel Tigard, OR 1S133CD 0 26p0 36 1989 OCT. 2 ' 4S-OI'60 Total 15 Right o{-\~'aJ Assessment Assessment mopw--- woo ROLL Basic cs) NT p¢rc¢ntof Assessment ts) 532.85 AcaSESS~aE s FINAL NUL L I.O• Trips Total (S) 0•pp Gen. D S w 135TH p,VE Address 0 0,08911 532.195 00 532.85 CIT-Y OF TIGAR Firstame e 1 0. LastNam¢ W. Ashbury Lan 532.85 No. Map&U%Looo Ronald E• & TtgBrd,.OR 9Z 223 e 10 0.0$911 532.85 Chappell 3anet E. 13,05S. . p,shbary Lan 0'Q0 CD 02700 97223 532.85 31 15133 Robert C. 8C Tigard, OR 0,08911 532.85 -vi etz Laura N. Lane 10 0.00 1S133GD 02800 Campbell W , Ashbury 532.85 38 136$1 S• OR 97223 0.08911 532.85 lene Tigard e 10 0.00 Andrew Shar W .Ashbury Lan 532.85 02900 13665 S' 91223 0.08911 532.85 39 1S133CD David W • & Marle Tigard: OR hlin 10 0.00 Carlyn 532.85 McLoug Z 15133CD 03000 Batten 1915 st n OR 9102 0.08911 0 532.85 40 Glad Lane 10 0.0 (aualico, W , Ashbury 532.85 03100 136215.0191223 0,08911 532.85 41 15133CD Inc. Thomas L. & Tigard, Lane 10 0.00 ur 85 CD 03200 McGee lobin D. 13593 S'))' 97223 y It 0.08911 532• 00 85 42 1S133 Mays peter T. TigarW • Ashbury Lane 1 532.85 0. 532• 15133CD 532.85 13519S. 9Z 223 10 0.0891 03300 0.00 3effrey W' Tigard' OR e 43 Ashbury Lan 532.85 04 i,oulson 13567 9Z S.W • 223 0 11 532.85 .0$9_ 44 1S133CD 034 Bryan L• Tigard: 01 a 10 0'00 00 Clough Colleen A• Ashbury Lan 532.85 135435. W • 91223 p.08g11 532.$5 45 15133CD 035 Lillie A• Tigard, OR Lane 10 0.00 Buell S.W . Ashbury 532.85 1S1330D 03640 3• T'ga d, OR 97223 Loop 10 0.0$911 0.00 532.85 46 Brian Swendo 11144 n 532.85 1S133CD Mary lp 0,08911 03g00 Spencer S•~A 97223 41 Kathleen Tigard, , p ark 03804 Kamel 2850 S.W .Web OR 91034 48 1S133CD Derek Sohn Lake Oswego, 1S133CD 03900 W arren 49 wpm% i wpm OUJ. 2 Ig89 ' r _Ql-6Q Toml no-own I~~S ltight_ot-~VaS Assessment Assessment 5SMENT 1101~1~ Basic ts~ ntot Assessment (S? 532.85 FIN~+L A55F~ Tries Pe Total q.00 AvNUF. L.l Gen. Address 532.85 2.85 S,V(J.I351 0.08911 53 CITY OF TIGARD Lastrame Fw tName Loop 10 0.00 W, Swendon 532.85 11712 97223 0.08911 532.85 Map&TOLotro• & Tigard, OR 10 0.04 po. Daniel G• don Loop 532.85 LtD 04000 Morgan Martha 11716 S•W• Swen97223 q •08911 AshburY 532.85 50 15133CD ~chael L• & Tigard, OR Lane 10 0.00 M W • 532.85 04104 ,,,,tiger Kathleen it. 13580S. OR 912,23 0.08911 & 51 15133CD William Y. Tigard, Y Lane 10 532.85 owell Nancy N. W. 917,2 0.00 04240 13598 S•P~s 3 532.85 8722 10 0.08911 0.00 532.85 52 15133CD Michael G• man Tigard, OR 04300 3 of f e 3 ani & Her • Ashbury Lane 532.85 53 15133CD Goldberg & 13620d • OWR 87223 1fl 0.48911 0• 532.85 00 Kenneth N. Tigar , Lane shbury 532.85 p4400 Wanvig Shelli p• 13642 S•'W 87223 0.08911 $32.85 y4 15133CD Kenneth & Tigard, OF. bury Lane 10 582.85 0.00 40 Schulte Debra 3• 64 S.W• Ash 87223 911 532.85 136 0,08 0 55 1S133CD 045 Mich le T. Tigard, OR %CLO 1fl 532.85 4.0 5133CD 04600 Monle Lane ~,ladst n , OR 97027 10 0,08911 0.40 532.85 W . y eiring 532.8 56 1 04700 Qualico, 13675 S.OR 97224 0.08911 532.85 51 15133CD Inc' Anita K• Tigard' Lane 10 0.00 g eiring 532.85 5g2.85 04800 Hanna & 13668 OR 97223 10 0.08911 0.00 151 . 33CD Steven Tigard, 58 0 Hall Blvd. 5g2.85 Adaltls Nina 14545 S.V. 87223 Lane 0.48911 532.85 15133CD 0490 3ames Ma be Tigard, 10 0.00 59 enighin A geiring 532.85 m Lisa S•W' 15133CD 05000 i Do l 13612 Tigard, Olt 97223 10 0.08911 60 Nicholas e Kousll Teresa 13595 S.W. Feiri Lan 15135CD 05100 Sean M• & Tigard, OR 97223 61 45200 Dugas Tonni R. 62 15133CD CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2 ,1989 Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. Last Name First Name Address Trips Percentof Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment (a) (S) 63 1S133CD 05300 Gonzales Pedro & Maria 13579 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 S. Tigard, OR 97223 64 1S133CD 05400 Westling Joseph E. & 13570 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Linda B. Tigard, OR 97223 65 1S133CD 05500 Eghlidi Siamak & Mary 13596 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 L. Hazard Tigard, OR 97223 66 1S133CD 05600 Rice Don S. & 13624 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Colleen Tigard, OR 97223 67 1S133CD 05700 Whitlow Michael A. & 13648 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Gaea J. Walker Tigard, OR 97223 68 1S133CD 05800 Sorg Bret K. & 13662 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Peggy A. Tigard, OR 97223 69 1S133CD 05900 Johnson G. Michael & 13670 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Elizabeth Tigard, OR 97223 Johnson-Hoch 70 1S133CD 06000 Seari Kenneth R. & 11763 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lani G. Tigard, OR 97223 71 1S133CD 06100 Pepadakes Robert J. & 11759 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Benita M. Tigard, OR 97223 72 1S133CD 06200 Fast Jeff A. & 11753 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kathy D. Tigard, OR 97223 73 1S133CD 06300 Fitzgerald David R. & 11749 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Catherine M. Tigard, OR 97223 74 1S133CD 06400 Greene Benny L. & 11735 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Betty J. Tigard, OR 97223 75 1S133CD 06500 Estoup Michael W. & 11804 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Janet K. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 n" mm IMAM a "I "M CITY OF TIGARD S. .135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL. 1548-01-60 OCT. 2 ,1989 Trips Percentof Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map 8. Tax Lot No. Last Name First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment (S) (S) 76 1S133CD 06600 Roeser Kevin W. & 11812 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Karen L. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 77 1S133CD 06700 Paakkonen Preston R. 11820 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Drive Tigard, OR 97223 78 1S133CD 06800 Egging Edward A. & 11828 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Brook Drive Tigard, OR 97224 79 1S133CD 06900 Becker Frank N. 11579 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97223 80 1S133CD 07000 Boylan James 0. & 11844 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kathleen V. Drive Tigard, OR 97224 81 1S133CD 07100 LeBore Larry D. & 11352 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Christine A. Drive Tigard, OR 97224 82 1S133CD 07200 Lee Mark L. & 11860 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lynnett D. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 83 1S133CD 07300 Mulkey Jonathan B. & 11868 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Robin L. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 84 1S133CD 07400 Bovero Brian R. & 11876 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Sally E. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 85 1S133CD 07500 McKnight A. Garth & 11884 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Denise L. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 M a OCT, 2 1999 1548-1'60 'Total AL ASSESSMENT ROLL Basic RAsse sment Assessment FIN cs~ UE I,.I.D• Trips Yercentof Assessment t$1 S,w,135TH AVER 'Total t$i 532.85 TiG AVH Address Gen. 532 0.00 CITY OF .85 Firstllatne 10 0.08911 MapTLotNo Lastrame SMorning Hill 1,7 532.85 Dl~io. 11492 •W• 0.00 Boyce A. Drive 97223 532.85 86 15133C07640 Dixon Tigard OR D Morning Hill 10 0.08911 11885 S.W. 0.00 532.85 wbridge David P• & Drive OR 97223 532.85 1S133CD 47700 Tro garin R. Tigard, 10 0.08911 22nd Avenue, 87 532.85 507 N•W• David P. & #107 0.04 Dolnogalla Lynda R. 97210 532.85 1S133CD 47800 portland, OR 14 0.08911 88 morning Hill ne & 11869 S.W. M 0.00 532.85 Sohn W ay arie Drive 97223 532.95 1S133CD 07900 Hill Dianna M Tigard, OR 0.08911 89 Morning Hill 10 11861 S.W W. 4.04 532.85 Margrethe Drive 532.85 OR 97223 0.08911 08000 Rodlunhnider- Tigard, 10 90 1S133CD Sc Morning 532.85 11853 gi ll S•W' Johnny & 4.40 Drive OR 97223 532.85 08100 Brown Jeanette Go Tigard, 10 0.08911 91 1S133CD Morning Hill & 11845 S•W • 0.04 532.85 Hopkins Gregory W' Drive OR 97224 532.85 92 1S133CD 08240 Hop Nancy Peake Tigard, 10 0.08911 Hill 11837 . Morning 0,40 532.85 & SW• Schaffner Joseph C• Drive OR 97223 532.85 1S133CD 08304 Martina T. Tigard, 10 0,08911 93 S., W. Morning Hill & 11829 0.00 532.85 Howden Edward A• Drive OR 97223 532.85 15133CD 08400 Mary Lou Tigard, 10 0.08911 94 Morning Hill W Christine C. & 11821S. Todd Jacqueline B. Drive 97223 1S133CD 08500 Tigard, OR 95 Boan CITY OF TIGARD, S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL. ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2,1989 Trips Percentof Basic Right-of-Way- Total LID No. Map&TaxLot No. Last Name First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment (S) 96 1S133CD 09700 McKenzie Charles A. & 11778 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Donna Jo Drive Tigard, OR 97223 97 1S133CD 09800 Koch Ryan G. & 11756 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Susan C. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 98 1S133CD 09900 Sorenson Keith M. & 11890 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Vicki L. Tigard, OR 97223 99 1S133CD 10000 Cole Steven C. & 11878 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Janice L. Tigard, OR 97223 100 1S133CD 10100 La Duca David P. & 11856 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tanya J. Tigard, OR 97223 3 IMP0,00- ova 00" fvvsm~ a'"s! oCi.•21g89 154$-Q1.GQ Total Woo """'Ri~haof~~'a` Assessment go Basic Assessment t5~ sop ASSES percentot Assessment l51 FIN AL Trips Total (s) 00 532.85 AV ENUF, I'•I'~ 4• ~ S.Vi1.135T~i Address Gen. 532.85 532.85 14 0.08911 0,00 CI'I,Y of TIGAR F,rstName Ave, L,,,Name 5Wilton 532.85 532.$5 &TaxLotNo. 11B34.- 23 10 0,08911 LIDNo %SP , Sung K' Tigard, OR Wilton Ave' $5 0.00 Chung S,W • 532• 97223 0,08911 532.85 10200 11812 OR 15133CD Philip E• Dee Tigard, 10 p.00 101 Milton Ave' 532.85 532.85 14300 Baker G- Andros 11726 S•W' 97223 11 1S133CD 8L ard, OR 10 0.089 0,44 102 David B• Tig Ave. GD 10400 Carnahan Bandy W ,Wilton 532.85 15133 Bruce 3• & Tiger d,•OR 92223 Ave. 10 0.08911 p.00 532.85 103 Debbie A• W , W ilton 532.85 10500 May 11232 S•0 R 97223 10 0.08911 532.85 CD Tigard, d 0.00 1S133 W 104 James & b W.Sorent° g.oa 532.85 D 10604 Grie Lenatte R• 8650 S• 005 532.85 0, 911 33G erton, OR g1 10 08 0,00 105 1S1 Helen J• Beav W• Wilton Ave. Toth 532.85 532.85 74 S• 106 1S133CD 10100 DO'a W • & Tigard, OR gZ 223 Lane 10 0.0$911 0,00 tirs 00 Gerdes Sonda C. 132 61 S.W • Ash 223 08911 23 $32.85 109 R 97 0. 532.85 1$ 133CD Steven C• Tigard, O e 10 0.00 107 Ashbury Lan 532.85 Stearns 13189 S.W • 97223 10 0.Q8911 532.85 1S133CD 10900 ard, OR 0.00 108 James K al Tig p,shbury Lane 85 532• 11000 Tong 13821 S•OR 91223 10 0,0$911 532.85 109 1S133CD W• pawl Jill Tigard' Ave, 0,00 Jones M. 5•W • W 532.85 532.85 CD 11100 & 11689 9122,3 10 0,08911 110 15133 Russel D. Tigard, OR Ave• O,QO Head Clara E. $•W , W ilton 532,85 1S133CD 11200 6 11221 OR g7223 10 0.08911 111 John K• Tigard S.W. Wilton Ave. 11304 Gilpin Brenda J• 11143 87223 112 15133CD Mark O'Dell & Tigard, OR gellie Jeanine man 113 15133CD 11404 Low Own 2Ig89 acr• Total Right.o{.\~ a5 Assessment Sim 00 ASSE55~N'~ ROLL Basic Assessment tSl POO percentot Assessment (Sl $32.85 FINA Trips Total (S) 0.00 UE L,I, V FJN Caen. 5TH A Address 532.85 95 OF TIGAKV S w' 13 FirstName on AVe' 1p 0.08911 0.04 532• CI`~Y LastName 65 S.W• Ngllt 532.85 4.0891 532.85 Tax LOtNo. OR 91223 LIDNo. Map A, Loraine Tigard, p,Ve. 10 1 4.00 00 geUer Gerald M• S.W.Wilton 532.85 0.00 .85 ~ 1S133CD 115 D, Ronald ~ Tiga d, OR 9g223 ve. 10 0.08911 532 11 M. W ilton A 532.85 5 18133GD 11600 Turner Ann 118 Ward, S.V. 97223 lp 0.08911 0.D0 532.8 ne W ve• 115 Ju ,Wilton 85 D 11 Todd 532. 404 11823 S•W92223 0.08911 116 1S133G Michael & Tigard, OR 10 532.85 Stegmann Carrie A• 0 S•W • W ilton Ave, 0.00 11800 1189 CR 94223 532.85 119 1S133CD Roy D• & Tigard' 10 0.08911 0.00 532.85 Sandra M• . 532,85 15133CD 11900 pfeifer W right 11864 S.W Wg9 223 Ave 0.08911 532.85 118 Ronald J. & Tigard, O• 10 0.00 Vrvilo Laur e A• 1 8$9 S.W• W97223Ave. 0`08911 532.85 532.85 0 0.0 119 1S133CD 12000 Kevi C. & Tigard, OR Ave, 1 C,lad3sz Michelle b- S.N , W 12,2,3 532.85 532. D 12100 1125 9122 0,08911 85 124 1S133C Tigard, OR Cir• 10 0.00 S•W• Sheffield 532,85 133CD 12200 Butterfield Jarttes D. 11566 94223 0,0891 121 18 1 532.85 gong C• Tigard, OR 10 0.04 Sheffield Gir• 532,$5 0p30D Doung 11594 S•0g 91223 532.85 33DB & ard, 1p 0.08911 0.00 122 151 Blair N• Tig Cir• ua t C• W . Sheffield 532.85 1S133DB 00400 Br get y E., Jr. 1S•GR 91223 10 0.0811 0.00 532.85 123 Forner &eBa tiara J. Tigard, Sheffield Or* S•W• 532.85 91223 0.08911 B 40500 11518 OIL 10 124 1S133D Robert J. & Tigard, C!" S,W V. Shef f field 04604 Albrecht Janet l" 11580 OR Dil 97223 125 1S133DB Bob Tigard, 1S133DB 44400 worth 126 SPA 1989 V" ISO pCT. 15~8'O1.60 Total gight•of-v`'a} c ent Asses m N,I. HpLL Basic Assessment ts) CIE FlirjAL ASSESS Percentof Assessment tsl 532.85 F. I,.} .I7 • Trips 'Total t51 40 D rw.l35TH AVENU Address Gen. 532,85 0. CITY pF TIGPX- 10 Q.48911 532.85 FirstName . 0.00 LastName W . Shelftell Cir 532.85 Ta%LotNo• 11586 S• R. 87223 0,08911 532,85 L1DNo. MaF Larry J• & Tigard, O Cir. 10 4.00 linchy Janette 5%. Sheffield 532.85 1S133DB 00800 McG H• 11588 S•Og 97223 p.08911 00 532.85 127 Scott K• & Tigard, 14 Sheffield Cir' 40900 Gilf illau Christine L• 11590 6'W' 532.85 33DB 97223 08911 532.85 10 0. 0.00 128 161 Catherine L• Tigard, Og Cl'- 53 01000 llyde 11604 S. Vq. Sheffield 2.85 129 18133DB Sohn D. & Tigard, OR 97223 10 0.08911 532.85 00 Cir• 0. 11640 S•W . Sheffield 532.55 g 01100 Taylor Judith V" 1S133D Og 91223 0.08911 532.95 130 Jeremy Tigard, Or- r_ 10 0.00 B 01200 Wilson . W • ghef f field 532•$5 11660 1S133D OR 97223 10 0.08911 532.85 131 Comb Marilyn L. Tigard, Sheffield Gir. 5 0.00 00 Mc Michael 11685 S. 4 • 532.8 1S133DB 413 D• ard, Og 97223 10 0.05911 532.85 132 Tig Cir, 0.00 B 0144 SWigert Molly X. W. Sheffield 532.85 3 0 & 1-16655. 91223 0.08911 532.85 3 Boger grit Tigard, Og Cir• 10 133 151 D ohnson 3e a nSue W , Shef field 532.85 0.00 33DB 01500 11645 S• Og 91223 .08911 532.85 134 161 Lee J. & Tigard, Cir, 10 0.00 41600 Cutbirth Angela M• 11625 S. 4. Sheffield 532.85 iS133DB Tigard, OR. 9122 10 0.08911 $32,85 135 James L' ` Cir. 0.40 gicks Carrol L. S.W ,Sheffield 532•$5 01700 L. & 11605 Olt g7223 10 0.08911 136 1S133DB Gregory Tigard, Place 532.85 Kamps Kathy S. 11599 S•w.134th 0.00 iS1303 01804 J• & Tigard, Og 97223 532.85 137 Stephen p,08911 Winter Marilyn3- 10 01900 John W • S.W . 134th Place 138 1S133DB 11597 97223 David W • & Tigard, Og 02040 Stephens Julie A• 139 1S133DB Immmmm'- wo on on pC`I.2 19$9 OVA 154g'pl .60 Totai Right.of.lN a~ Assessment ISO .NT Rol", basic Assessment (S1 AL ASSESSMr, Trips percentof Assessment tSl 532.85 ,IN 'Total ts) 4 1J F' L1.D • p.0 TK AVE Address en. 532.85 D •1-35 0.08911 532.85 pF T1G A S.~ R FirstNa ue W. place 10 0.00 134th CYTY LastNan'e 532.85 MapgTaxLotNo. D. 1 9rd -OR 94223 10 4.08911 4.04 532•$5 ~DNo. Larry T g th Flace g Kaug W anda S.W 134 • 532.5 532.85 140 1S1303 02100 Tracy W • & T ga d, OR 9223 10 0.48911 0.00 Kart Sigrid A• S.W.134th glace 532.85 K 33DB 02200 11581 OR 9g223 0 4.08811 532.85 141 151 Teri V• Tigard 1 0.00 Wasco S.W• K'Ynbal g7034 532.85 3 15133DB 023" evin J. & bake Oswego OR 10 0.08911 0.00 52.85 I K c.W . Sheffield C!" 532 O1Kalloran Lynn R. .85 33DB 02400 11584 94223 0.08911 532.85 143 161 Lee K• 8&B Tigard, OIL 10 0.00 Robertson yirgln1S • S• j Sheffield 532.85 15133DB 02500 R. & 115955: OR 97223 10 0.08g11 0.00 532.85 144 Davis 1{ Tig ffleld Cir. 532.85 Stanger Carol D. S.W • She 532.85 B 42600 11583 91223 0.08911 145 151330 3effrel K' Tigard, OR Cir. 10 0.0 4.08911 532.85 532.85 02700 lla~lel Linda K• N. & Tag1j581 Stef 151330B s A ard, Cir. 10 0.00 146 Rothenberg Rosal uds. S•W . Sheffield 532.85 85 W 10 0.08911 0,00 532• 44 1S133DB 02840 er Garl S• & Tiga Tigard, OR 942 field C!" 1 00 alt Held! L• 11544 S.W .chef 532.85 2.85 1330 029 97223 0.48911 53 148 15 B Yao_1 Tem Wa' Tigard, OR Sheffield C"* 10 5385 O.0 Chang Chun S•W • 2• 1S133DB 03000 Dennis M• Tigard, OR 94223 10 0.08911 0.04 532.85 ld Cir• 149 Sheffie 53 3DB 03100 Bourgeois & 11573$ •OR 150 1513 97223 10 2.85 0.08911 r Scoles Bab Ca. E• Tigard W -Sheffield C"' 03204 11571 S. 84223 151 151330B urgeon Vicki L• Tigard, OR 1S133DB 033p0 Sp 152 I ! mil! ? !ll°"! " ! ! f• CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2 ,1989 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. Last Name First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment 153 1S133DB 03400 Trubits William J. & 11569 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Beth L. Tigard, OR 97223 154 1S133DB 03500 McKernan Donald & 11567 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Cheryl Tigard, OR 97223 155 1S133DB 03600 Kinnaman Edward L. & 11565 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Mary Anne Tigard, OR 97223 156 1S133DB 03700 McGregor Richad D. & 11465 SW Winterlake Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Katherine A. Tigard, OR 97223 157 1S133DB 03800 Hartwick Gerald D. & 11445 SW Winterlake Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Peggy L. Tigard, OR 97223 158 1S133DB 03900 Welter Jeffrey Wayne 11425 SW Winterlake Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Carlton Tigard, OR 97223 159 1S133DB 04000 Jenkins William & 11405 SW Winterlake Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Carol L. Tigard, OR 97223 160 1S133DC 00200 Wilson Steven G. & 11610 S.W. 135th 40 0.35644 2,131.40 0.00 2,131.40 Linda J. Tigard, OR 97223 161 1S133DC 00300 Scott George 0. & 11640 S.W. 135th 10 0.08911 532.85 1,075.57 1,608.42 Donna M. Tigard, OR 97223 162 1S133DC 00400 Scott George 0. & 11640 S.W. 135th 60 0.53466 3,197.11 5,070.54 8,267.65 Donna M. Tigard, OR 97223 163-1 1S133DC 14600 Porter Laureston C. 13281 S.W. Tamera Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Christine E. Tigard, OR 97223 163-2 1S133DC 14700 Pederson Richard D. & 13269 S.W. Tamera Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Florence J. Tigard, OR 97223 163-3 1S133DC 14800 Poling Douglas & P.O. Box 25571 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Susan L. Portland, OR 97223 MOEN= OCT. 21939 1548()1-60 OLL Total FINAL ASSESSMENT R Basic Right o0;a3 Assessment AVENUE L.I.D. Percentof Assessment Assessment tS) S•vd,135TH Trips Total (s) 0.00 532.85 CITY OF TIC ARI) Gen. 5 ~pNo Last Name FirstName Address 532,85 Map&TaxLotNo. 10 0.08911 . p,O, Box 25571 Portland, OR 97223 Don 532.85 163-4 15133DC 14800 Morissette 0,00 Builder, 10 0,08911 532.85 Inc. P.O. Box 25571 Portland, OR 97223 15000 Don 532.85 163-5 1S133DC Morissette 0.00 Builder, 10 0.08911 532.85 Inc. p.O, Box 25571 Portland, OR 97223 Don 532.85 163-6 1S133DC 15100 Morissette 0.00 Builder, 0.08911 532.85 10 532,85 Inc. 13087 S.W• Tamera bane 0 Yosaburo & OR 97223 .00 Morita Tigard, 532.85 1S133DC 15200 Yoko 10 0'08911 163-7 p.O• Box 25571 OR 97223 163-8 1S133DC 15300 Don orissette Portland, 0.00 532.85 .M 532.85 Builder, 10 0.08911 Inc. & 12945 S.W • Laurmont Dr. 0,00 532.85 Baldwin Kathryn 1- Tigard, OR 97223 0.08911 532.85 163-9 15133DC 15400 Dale L. 12923 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 532.85 Mark K. & OR 97223 532.85 0.00 Wold Joyce Blaine Tigard, 0.08911 163-10 IS133DC 15500 12901 S.W Laurmont Dr. 10 532.85 R. Scott & OR 97223 532.85 0.00 Hansen Tigard, 10 0,08911 163-11 1S133DC 15600 Sheryl R. 12930 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 0,00 532.85 Cohoon Stephen Alan Tigard, OR 97223 0.08911 532.85 1S133DC 15700 & Kathy B. 10 163-12 12952 S.W. Laurmont Dr. priester William F•, Jr. Tigard, OR 97223 1S133DC 15800 & M. Blaine 163-13 1989 oc Total L 15~$-~~'$R,g \~a) As e ssrne"t vp goo 0 ht-of- SSESS NT R ~L Basic Assessment (s) 00 110 0 AL percentof Assessment t$) FIB A gips W 532.85 Tote 0.00 Gen• ij D • .~35T$ ~ Address 532.85 85 0.08911 0.40 532. S w CITY OF TIGAR FirstNan'e 44 S•W• Laurmont Dr. 10 NaKle 532.85 1101st 532.85 vkav&Ta%LotNo. & Su_ 129ard, OR 97223 10 0.48911 0.40 ,AD No Dennis Tig Dr. 3ohnson Lan W • 163-14 1S Laurmont 532.85 532.85 133DC 15900 R• Tig129a6 a 'OR 8.1223 j0 0.48911 2.85 4.40 Nadine 16000 White 2.134 N.Ed• ORh9Z213 0,08911 53 532.85 1S133DC Dave A• be portlan 7 10 0.00 163-1 5 Anderson Laurmont Dr- 532.85 C 16104 3oleen M• 13032 S.O V. 91223 532.85 1S133D 3r• Tigard, OR 10 0.08911 0,00 ont Dr. •Laurm 163-16 Charles V S.OR W 8.1223 C 16204 Dunham Sharon W • 532.85 532.85 13044 0,08911 4,00 163-11 1S133D genry K& Tigard' Laurmont Dr. 10 532.85 16344 Todd Brenda 13056 S•wR 94223 0.48911 532.85 0'4 163-18 1S133DC ossberger Kung S• Soo Tigers SOW • Laurm nt Dr. 10 11 532.85 532,85 16400 M y 1307 OR 9722 0.089 1S133DC Anthony Tigard: ont Dr. 10 4•00 163-18 hio ive W . Laurin 582.85 16500 Tracc 3oseph 13090 S'OR 91223 Dr. 0.08911 532.85 15133DC ard, 10 & ont 0.04 163-24 Randall Tig E• Fitch W. Laurin 532.85 16640 Laura A' 4•pg911 532.85 & 13112S. 912,23 14 1S133DC Belly 3• Tigard, OR Dr• 0.00 163-21 B S• Laurinont 532.85 6Z 00 Moskalik Angela 34 S•OR 91223 532.85 1S133DC 1 & 3ulie 13134 10 4.08911 0•q0 163-22 Olaf M • Tig aurmont Dr. 532.85 6800 Svenson R, 13158 S•W' Lg1223 0.48811 532.85 1S133DC 1 Kathryn Tigard, OR ont Dr. 10 0.00 Bump 16343 16904 prey 13160 S•W • Laurm 532.85 OR 92223 0.08911 1S133DC Nellie L• Tigard, ont Dr, 10 163-24 Laurm 301jes 13112 S•W- 1S133DC 14040 'Tigard, OR 168-25 91223 I. 1S133DC 14100 Watanabe Dale 163-26 memo= Bow- Ion WN K OCT. OLL 1548.01-60 2 o x989 FINAL ASSESSMENT Basic Bight-ot Wa) Assessment tgi TICARD Sy. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. Trips percentof Assessment Assessment CITY OF Address Gen. Total FirstName , 0.00 532'85 LastName 10 0.08811 532.85 I,IDNo. Map&TaxLotNo. pp. Box 25571 Dan Portland, OR 97223 163-27 1S133DC 17200 Morissette 532.85 .00 532.85 0 Builder, 10 0.08911 Inc. 13236 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 532.85 Alexander B. Tigard, OR 97223 532.85 0.00 33DC 17300 Balough & Dina D. 10 0,08911 0.00 163-28 151 Marie 13258 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 532.85 163-29 1S133DC 17400 Hathaway Tigard, R 87223 10 0,08911 532.85 P.O. Box 25571 Dan Portland, OR 97223 163-30 15133DC 17500 Morissette 532.85 532.85 0'00 Builder, 10 0,08911 Inc. 13292 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 0.00 532.85 163-31 1S133DC 17600 Glover R Marjobertorie Irt Ly&net Tigard, OR 97223 08911 532.85 13247 S.W. Laurmont Dr. lp 0. 532.85 Gary M• & Tigard, OR 97223 532.85 0.00 1S133DC 17700 Waxman Katherine M. 10 0.08911 163-32 Tamera Lane 532.85 Terry J. & Lori 13178 S•©R 97223 0.00 Krumm Tigard, 10 0.08911 532'85 163-33 1S133DC 17800 L. Tam era Lane & 13146 W. 0.00 532.85 Born William S. Tigard, OR 97223 532.85 163-34 1S133DC 17900 Esther B. 10 0.08911 13134 S.W. Tamera Lane 532.85 man E. & Tigard, OR 97223 532.85 0'00 IS DC 18000 Nordstrom Margaret L. 10 q.08911 163-35 13120 S.W. Tamera Lane 532.85 Larry A. & Tigard, OR 97223 532.85 0.00 1S133DC 18100 Skuzie Carol A. 10 q,08911 163-36 Tamera Lane 532.85 Kim Anthony 13090 O 97223 0.00 163-37 1S133DC 18200 Louie Tigardi 08911 532'85 & Christine L. & 13058 S.W. Tamera Lane 10 0, Butler James E. Tigard, OR 97223 163-38 1S133DC 18300 Susan mmomp- OC1`. % 1959 1548-01-60 Total L Rigbt_oq vas Assessment SsE55MENT gOL Basic Assessment t8) ` FINAL A Trips percentot Assessment ts) 532.85 SUE L.I Total 0,00 Gen. AV E Address 532.85 T~GARD.SW.135Tg FtrstNante 0.08911 532.85 to 0.40 CITY OF g•W • Laurmont Dr' 532.85 LastKame 13081 am OR 97223 0.0$911 NtaFguTaxLotl3o F. L Tigard, 10 y~,D~o. Willi C 1$400 Bishop Constance p.0• Box 1952.5 7219 532.85 o.4a 163.39 1S133D Portland: OR 532.85 Don 10 0.08911 532.85 0 15133DC 18540 Morissette 0,00 ont Dr- 163-4 guilder, 13165a .ORLg1223 10 Og911 532.85 0.00 1,065.70 Inc. 0. David L. Toga Dr' DC 186 p elinka W Vl Interlake 1!465.7 4 00 116555 OR 97223 0.17822 41 1S133 Gerald & Tigard, 20 163- Melanie B• W Falcon Rise 532.85 C 00545 Liddell 1325© S. • OR 97223 0.00 163-42 1S133D Tigard' S32.85 0.00 0.q0 W edgeWood g 0.08911 1$133DC 0p640 omes of 10 W. Falcon Rise 0,04 164 .p0 Portland, 13435 S. 97223 0 0.4p040 Inc. J• & Tigard, OR 4 0.00 Mlcaaa R. W • Falcon Rise 0,00 g5 165 C 44700 Orr San 13025 S•OR 97223 Rise 0 0,00000 832• 1S133D is A• & Tigard, 0 .00 Dennis n Jensen Christine 13065 S,W. Falco 532.85 532.85 23 10 ©.08911 00 C 00804 Janet OR 942 0 1S133D Dennis & Tigard: Rise ' 166 W . Falcon 532.85 C 00801 Hasty W • & 3anet 13065 S•OR 97223 0.48911 532.85 1S133D nis TigardI 10 0•00 167 Den Falcon Rise 532.85 p0gp0 gasty W • 13085 S.M. 91223 iS133DC M ard+ OR 10 0.48911 168 Martha K• Tig on Rise Clancy 13105 S.W . F alc 159 15133DC 01400 David 6L • ard! OR 97223 M A Tig 01100 Gaffney patricis 110 16133DC Orit! t son 010- r • 2 1989 00 , too wpm 1548~a1.64 focal I,L Rggrt,ot.Ra; Assessment SSNiENT Ito Basic Assessmen t51 Poo F1rjAL p,SSE Trips percentof Assessment ts) 532.85 11 AvEN~E L.1.D• Gen. Total 1532.85 0.04 Address •$5 S W ,135T 0.0$911 532 TIGAI girstKame 14 a.00 CITY OF 5 S.W. Falcon Rise 532,85 Lasthame 1312 OR 91223 0,48911 532.85 Map g.TasLotNo10 0.00 J, Tigard, 2,85 LID rio. Ryan F aleon Rise 53 85 • 91223 1S133DC 41244 Kelly Vaghn S' & T'jgard,OR Rise 10 0.08911 0,04 532• • palcon 532.85 171 ~a 00 man L. W S• 0,08911 532.85 liiek Patric 13165 97223 413 1S133DC omio Tigard, OR ise 14 0.00 172 T W • Falcon 91223 R 532.85 C 0104 Drush ita ni 131$5 S. 1.08911 532.85 OR 10 0.00 173 1S133D Day' A. & Tigard, on Rise Donaldson Carol S• S. W • 91-223 F532.85 C 01500 13211 OR 10 O,p8911 0 532.85 1S133D LinzeY J• & Tigard, q.4 174 n 25 paleo 3Rise 532.85 R W • 9122 08911 532.85 41600 gorrest Thawor 132 TigardS, . O 1p 0. 1.04 D Olive M• & Rise 145 iS133 C C 41110 Charles Clarena L• 13245 S• • Faleon 532.85 532.85 176 1S133D 97223 10 p•089 11 0,40 OR R Daniel J- Tigard, 0W Falcon ise 532.85 SOa Watson 13265 S'W' 91223 911 532.85 ard> OR 14 4.08 0.00 1S133DC 01 Mark IL be Tig 177 on Ri$e 532.85 01914 Bonebrake Marilyn R. 13285 S.W- 91223 1.08911 Yalc iS133DC Robert eD a Jr'' Tigard, O Morning Kill 10 118 & C 02004 Poole pnn 11950 S.W. & Joan Drive OR 97223 532.85 179 pred E• Tigard: Den]- C. q,a4 1g133DC 02104 .~ranklin 532.85 184 gederal 10 p.48911 Savings 8L hill Loan Assn. y,~ .Morning Abney 11930 S• e/a ert be Drive OR 3 a4 George Pa e18. Tigar 1S133DC d: 9722 181 022 OCT. 2 1989 mppmwm~- WOW" 1-60 uVor" 1548-0 Total +0"y ENT BOLL %ght•ofWa) Assessment SSESSM Basic IN AI, p, Assessment ~~ENU,E L.I.D• F, Trips Percentof Assessment (S) SM _ 135TH Address Gen' Total 0,00 532.85 TIGARD CITY OF FirstName to 0.08911 532.85 Map&Ta% otNo. UastName 11920 ..W. Morning Hill y~DNo. Stephen & Drive 532.85 1S133DC 02300 Royal patrica K• & Tigard, OR g7223 532,85 0.00 182 Edward L• & 0.08911 Mary Kendall 1910 ..,W. Hill 10 Morning 532.85 1 0.00 harry L. & Drive OR g7223 532.85 1S133DC 02400 Schaart Marilyn M. Tigard, 10 0.08911 1900 S.V. Morning Hill 183 1 0.00 532.85 Sohn C• Drive OR 87223 532.85 184 1S133DC 02500 Morris Mitzi G• Tigard: 10 0.08911 ill B 11905 S.' W. morning 532.85 K C & Fang Drive 0.00 Chen OR 97223 532.85 1S133DC 02600 Tan Tigard, OR 10 0.08911 185 Morning & 12402 S.W. Watanabe Dean A• Drive OR 97223 1S133DC 02700 Leslie & Tigard, 532.85 186 Robert S. & 0.00 532.85 Faith F• Hill l0 0.08911 Watanabe 119255 W• Morning 532.85 Karen S. & Drive 0'00 02800 Thomas C• 10 0.08911 187 1S1 McCoy Tigard, OR 97223 Morning Hill 532.85 33DC 11935 W. 0,00 532.85 Berman & Drive OR 97223 532.85 C 02900 White Marianne Tigard, 10 0.08911 188 1S133D Hill g 11945 S.-W. Mornin 0.00 532.85 Victor P. & Drive OR 87223 532.85 1S133DC 03000 girma Annette L. Tigard, 10 0.08911 189 Morning Hill 11955 5•W India i~i• & Drive OR 87223 190 1S133DC 43100 3obelmann Herman Tigard, y CITY OF TIGARD, S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2 ,1989 Trips Percentof Basic Right-of-V1Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. Last Name First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment (s) 191 1S133DC 03200 Reaves Marcus C., II 11965 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Katina M. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 192 1S133DC 03300 Knappenber John D. & 12002 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 ger Sheryl G. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 193 1S133DC 03400 Wedgewood 13250 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Homes, Inc. Tigard, OR 97223 194 1S133DC 03500 Hanson Virginia M. 13190 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97223 195 1S133DC 03600 Nahme Hans H. & 13170 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Patricia J. Tigard, OR 97223 196 1S133DC 03700 Georgeson John R. & Sally 13150 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 A. Tigard, OR 97223 197 1S133DC 03800 Wolf Dennis T. & 13130 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Valerie M. Tigard, OR 97223 198 1S133DC 03900 Stafford Lynn & 13110 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Rebecca L. Tigard, OR 97223 199 1S133DC 04000 Barnett Jerry D. & 13090 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Arleen N. Tigard, OR 97223 200 1S133DC 04100 Raymond Gary 13050 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97223 • OCT_ 2 1989 .SAM .6Q Total 48- »"'M"' ht-ot' itig ~VaS p,,ssessmen ASS~SS~,~~NT 110i' Percentol Basic Assessment lS1 Assessment lS1 0,00 FINAL Trips Total (sl 0.00 UE I, I.D- Gen. D g.W • 135TH AVEN Address 0.00 o.ooooo F TAG AR girstr'an7e 0 CITY G LastNalne 0.00 Map ~TaxLotNo. 0•p0 tiDNo ;N 0.00 532.85 Morning 0,00000 0.00 15133DC 04190 gill Home 0 532.85 201 Owners Unknown Address 10 0.08911 4,00 532.85 Assoc' Sohn g, •W, Sheffield C"' 532.85 11562 S 91223 0,08911 532.85 44240 Pearl Tigard, OR 10 0.40 242 15133DC Steven H• 532.85 1 0 532•g5 3 1S133DC 44300 Schreiber • & 13250 S•OR 9Z223 ny 10 0.0891 p.0 Cary D 20 er Tigard, ,W .133rd Place 532.85 Hostetl fancy l" 11560 SOR gZ223 532.85 C 04400 0.00 15133D ard, 10 0.08911 204 Cathy A' Tig place Gates w • 133rd 532.85 532.85 C 04504 11559S. OR 912,13 0 0,08911 p0 1S133D Glenda Tigard, 1 4. 205 W 133rd Place 532.85 C 04600 McAdam 115565. • R 223 O g3 0.08911 532•$5 10 85 0.00 1S133D er Elnora Tigard, 206 133rd Place 532• W • 15133DC 04140 Wheel 54 S. 532.85 • & ~ gard, OR 97223 e 14 0,08911 202 Ricky R plac 0.00 Deeds 3vlie Ann W . 133rd 532.85 C 04800 , 3r•, 11558 S' 97223 10 0.08811 209 1$ 133D David 11• Tigard, OR 532.85 jqiskanen & Katie S• S.W. Brittany 0.00 09 16133DC 04840 Prank 11' & place 11 OR 912,%3 0.p8911 532.85 532.85 2 ells Patti Tigard, 10 0,40 W 3• 133rd Place 532.85 210 1S133DC 05040 11559 g . W• OR 91223 10 0.08911 532.85 3ac~uelyn Tigard, Dr, 0.00 S•W , gritt 211 1S133D any 532.85 Agee 6L 132$5 Tigard, OR 87223 10 0,08911 C 05144 Richard G• W• Brittany Dr' Will Carol 3• 3S• 91223 212 15133DC 45200 3oyce g. Tigard OR . 15133DC 05300 Travers 213 OCT. 2 1989 own woo 1548.01.60 Total "a on RpI,L Right•oe-vas Assessment FINAL ASSFSSMEN Basic Assessment (S) Percentoi Assessment (S) 7 I...I•v• 'Trips Total t51 ,135TH A~EN~Ia Gen. 0.00 532.85 CITY OF TIG ARD S, Address 532,85 FirstPiame 10 0,08911 532.85 tNo. Lastl~ame Brittany Dr. q00 , Map~Ta,,Lo 13355 S•W. 97223 532.85 L1nAo. Blizabeth K• ard, 10 0.08911 Davis Tig 532.85 S.W. S.W. Brittany Dr. 0.00 1S133DC 13435 214 & 97223 532.85 3oseph ri Tigard, OR 10 0.08911 532.85 Brittany Dr. 215 15133DC 05500 Bertrand Margu 13455 S.W. erte B. 532.85 0,00 Michael H. Tigard, OR 97223 10 0.08911 532.85 1S133DC 05600 Burns Brittany Dr. 0.00 216 ak Lee W • & Betty Tigard,.OR 97223 r• 10 0.08911 532.85 532.85 1S133DC 05700 pakul L• S.W. Brittany D 0.00 217 Blaine 13495 S• 97223 532.85 Peter & Tigard, 10 0.08911 0,00 532.85 Frank 218 IS133DC 05800 13222 ManCA 92040 532.85 David S. Kraska Lakeside, Cir, 10 q,08911 1S133DC 05900 Geving Michele 11675 S.W. Sheffield 532.85 219 & OR 87223 0.00 William It. Tigard, 532.85 06000 Graf p lice R. 10 0.08911 220 1S133DC Grandehamp 3420 S.W. Brittany 0.00 532.85 1 Randy L• Drive OR 97223 532.85 06100 Eggers Tigard, 10 0.08911 221 1S133DC Brittany & 11390 S.W. 0,00 532.85 Richard G• Square OR g7223 532.85 C 06200 Olson Michele Tigard, 10 0.08911 222 1S133D 13370 S.W. Brittany 532.85 Lynda D• 0.00 Bell Drive OR 87223 532.85 1S133DC 06300 Tigard, 10 p,08911 223 S.W. Brittany L• & Amy 13350 Max Drive OR 94223 1S133DC 06400 Sehaef er J • Tigard, 224 Now CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2 ,1989 Trips Percentof Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. Last Name First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment (s) (s) 225 1S133DC 06500 Suer Ann K. 13330 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Drive Tigard, OR 97223 226 1S133DC 06600 Hart Randal W. & 13310 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Ann K. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 227 1S133DC 06700 Davis William R. & 13290 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Margaret C. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 228 1S133DC 06800 Underhill Michael L. 13270 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Drive Tigard, OR 97223 229 1S133DC 07000 Hu Ching Feng & 13295 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Yuan Sheng Tigard, OR 97223 230 1S133DC 07100 Rankin Steven L. & 11775 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Teresa L. Tigard, OR 97223 231 1S133DC 07200 Solomon Leroy A. 11765 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97223 232 1S133DC 07300 Heberle Jeffrey L. & 11755 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Wendi L. Tigard, OR 97223 233 1S133DC 07400 Schmitz Stephen M. and 11745 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kathryn L. Tigard, OR 97223 234 1S133DC 07500 Joy Robert M. & 11735 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Pamela J. Tigard, OR 97223 235 1S133DC 07600 Cummings Ronald J. & 11725 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Maria D. Tigard, OR 97223 236 1S133DC 07700 Spencer Scott P. & Lisa 11715 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Hamel Tigard, OR 97223 I CITY OF TIGARD S. .135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2 ,1989 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. Last Name First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment (s) (S) (S) 237 1S133DC 07800 Quayle Timothy P. & 11705 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Rhonda S. Tigard, OR 97223 238 1S133DC 07900 Madarang Raul E. & Nora 11690 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97223 239 IS133DC 08000 Findlay Jeffrey S. & 11700 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Genalee Tigard, OR 97223 240 1S133DC 08100 McLeod Gordon L. & 11710 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Cleo A. Tigard, OR 97223 241 1S133DC 08300 Wade Jerry and 11720 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lynne M. Tigard, OR 97223 242 1S133DC 08400 Holmstrom Kevin P. & 11730 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Colleen B. Tigard, OR 97223 243 IS133DC 08500 Harrold Dennis P. & 11740 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Michelle R. Tigard, OR 97223 244 1S133DC 08600 Davis Lee W. & 13255 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Barbara C. Tigard, OR 97223 Norlin 245 1S133DC 08700 Miller Marshall J. & 13245 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lori D. Tigard, OR 97223 246 1S133DC 08800 Willett Mark R. & Lisa 13235 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 K. Tigard, OR 97223 247 1S133DC 08900 Bowgren Mark A. 13225 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97223 248 1S133DC 09100 Menzies Bruce D. & 13215 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kathleen A. Tigard, OR 97223 249 1S133DC 09300 Pies Ronna G. 13205 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97223 Ell OC,I'. ~ 19$9 - 1545.01.60 Total a5 (tight' Assessment SSLSS~I~NT RpLL Basic Assessment tSl ago L A perceatof Assessment tS1 r I` IN Trips Total (S) 00 532.85 1,.1,U• Gen. 0• S•w.135,i'H AVENU Address 532.85 0,08911 532,85 F TIGMID' Firstl3an'e 10 0.00 CITY Q tame McDonald 532.85 o Map&TaxLOtNo. Las Debra Ann T gar , OR 9g224 rive 10 0.08911 0.00 532.85 ~Dri alter 13185 S.W• Shore D 532.85 09440 Schow 91223 p.p8g11 532.85 250 1S133DC Mark C• Tigard' OR 10 0.00 rive 50© Nettle Kristin A• 13145a `ORS9722D 10 4089 251 11 532.85 00 532.85 1S133DC 09 Mark A• ~ Tigar 'S.w. Shore Dave 1. 532.85 09600 English Thelma 13165 OR 01223 0.08g11 00 532.85 1S133DC ron L. Sc Tigard, rive 10 0' OIL 252 0g700 Swanson BIND K' 13155a .1" 9g223D D 0.48911 532.85 532.85 15133DC Tim W. & Tigar ' rive 10 5 0.p0 253 M. 32.85 133DC 09800 Stockton Roxann 13145 S'W • Shore 97223 0.08911 532•g5 andall K• & Tigard, WL ve 10 0.00 254 1S R S•W , Shore Dr 532.85 nker Virginia K' 13135 4.08811 532.85 E 0.00 C 09900 Bri Madeline C• • T'g ard, 2 55 1S133D OR 91223 rive 10 Shore 532.%5 33DC 10400 Vincent t J. & 131ard,.WOR 256 1S1 S9°t223 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 • Kroon Cynthia X. 13 10 S.W .Brittan) C 10100 532.85 1S133D Donald C• & Drive OR 92223 4.08911 251 hanie C. Tigard, 10 532.85 1S133DC 10200 Winslow Step 13220 S.W . Brittany 258 David 532'85 0.00 Tigard, OR 97223 10 0.08911 41,h el Rena Drive Holton 532.85 259 1S133DC 10300 isa 0 S•W • Brittany 0.00 1323 532.85 Larry J. 1' Drive OS g1223 0.08911 10 33uC 1p400 Wise p,. 13240 Tigard, S. W. Brittany 260 1S1 M, g. ~ch el a Drive 23 Stock Mary L. Tigard, Og g12 1S133DC 10500 261 CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2 ,1989 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. Last Name First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment lS) (S) (S) 262 1S133DC 10600 Kroner Thomas M. & 13235 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Sherry Drive Simmons Tigard, OR 97223 263 1S133DC 10700 Davis Raymond L. & 13325 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Patricia A. Drive Tigard, OR 97223 264 1S133DC 10800 Pettit Janet K. 13215 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Drive Tigard, OR 97223 265 1S133DC 10900 Wedgewood 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 0 0.00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Homes Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 266 1S133DC 11000 Hurd Cynthia Joanne 13309 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Darrel G. Tigard, OR 97223 Shereck 267 1S133DC 11100 Scholz Albert R. & 10202 S.W. Conestoga #7 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Zella L. Beaverton, OR 97005 268 1S133DC 11200 Blangsted Nancy & 13387 S.W. Laurmont Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Charlene Tigard, OR 97223 Ferger 269 1S133DC 11300 Baese Craig A. and 13401 S.W. Laurmont Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Linda L. Tigard, OR 97223 270 1S133DC 11400 Scottco 11665 S.W. 98th Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Building & Tigard, OR 97223 Design, Inc. 271 1S133DC 11500 Shopmeyer Michael N. & 13445 S.W. Laurmont Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Susan F. Tigard, OR 97223 272 1S133DC 11600 Scott Randall G. & 13467 S.W. Laurmont Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Verna Marie Tigard, OR 97223 IWA ~ .1989 OCT. 15A8-QI -6Q total a) N ~ight.ot- Assessment Assessment L ASSESS ME T ROLL Basic tsl s '1 FINAL percent Assessment W 532 Trips of ts► .85 I„F.D• Gen Tota 0.00 D S.W .135TH A~ BNUE Address 532.85 AR, 4.08911 532,85 CITY OF TIG Fira,Nante yastl3at"e 13489 S.W. Laurmont Ct. 10 5320 0.00 0.00 532.85 .slap g;Tax lotNo. Ralph B. Tigard, OR 97223 ont Ct. 10 0.08911 yIDNO. and 404 Mervain Cherie A• 13486 S.W, Laur94223m 532.85 1S133DC 11 10 0.08911 532.85 273 Andrew C- & Tigard, 6 5 W' Laurmont Ct- ~--0,00 Brehm 3a1ine b. 8 S•W' 532.85 C 11800 1347 84223 08911 532.85 4 1S133D Tigard, OR 10 p. 24 Carl V • & Laurmont Ct. 0.00 11604 Gioia Kathleen A' 13434 S•W • 532.85 1S133DC W. & OR, 97223 0.48811 532.85 245 William Tigard, ont Ct• 10 0.00 12400 vlzle Rhonda 3' 13412 S.W • Laurm 532.85 D R 97223 0.08911 532.85 3 C 2q6 1513 Matthew B. Tigard, b ane 14 0.00 Maleta W , Imperial 532,85 1S133 DC 12100 20560 S. OR 94006 0.08911 532.85 277 3an T. & ploba, 10 0.00 Shore Drive 12200 Virding Melody 133aS. W 97223 532.85 532.85 OR 248 1S133DC L• Bret & Lori Tigard, 0.08911 0.00 W• Shore Drive 532.85 04 gouston D. 13350 S• 1S133DC 123 OR 87223 0.08911 532.85 249 Gerald R. Tigard, 10 0.00 , s-'" ho Drive 532.85 C 12400 Rouleau 13338 S•W 91223 532.85 1S133D OR 0.08911 284 3erry W• Tigard, 10 0,00 W oodin W . Shore Drive 532.85 33DC 12540 & 13326 OR 97223 0.08911 532.85 291 181 William G. Tigard, ore Drive 10 0.04 ntunes Michelle W . Sh 532.85 133DC 12600 A & 13314 91223 10 0.08911 532.85 282 1S David C• Tigard, OR 0.00 Shore Dave 532.85 C ,2700 Ulbricht Lori John K• R. 13302 S.W. 97223 08911 283 1S133D Tigard, OR 10 0• & Drive 13290 S,W . Shore Sehiuing Laurie G. 284 1S133DC 12800 Michael D. 6L Tigard, OR 94223 n Melanie 1S133DC 12900 Osbor e 285 OVA Von Will" GCT•21989 48.1'60 Total ~ rJ Rtght.of ~v a5 p,,ssessment slow-momSESSIVIENT ROLL tot s8e sment Asse `~rnent tsl got FINAL AS Trips percen A (s) 532.$5 Tota, p0 TIC AVENUE I' I ~ • Address Gen. 532.$5 0 32,85 OF TIGARD S w 13 FirstName 10 0.08911 0.00 5 CITY S.W. S 91223 hore Drive 532.85 L OR .08911 532.85 MaP&TaxLotl~o. astNa ne Nareth 13268 ard, 10 0 0,00 LID1'`o. TO Ttg Shore Drive 532.85 Donn C. 13236 S•O' 91223 532.85 OR' 1p 0.08911 0.0 1S133DC 13000 Tigard, Drive o & 286 Suss Ch ier st Aie• L• S.W . Shore 532.85 1S133DC 13100 Randall Y• & 132 Tigard, OR 91223 10 0.48911 0.00 532.85 281 b Gin Rae Shore Drive 532.85 1S133DC 13200 Cr°s y Raa 13212 S'~R 91223 0,08911 $32.85 C• Tigard, 10 0'00 2gg W • Shore Drive C 13300 nhttecotto Dana 13200 S• 532.85 532.85 289 IS-11133D Sohn R. & Tigard, OR 91223 rive 10 0.08911 0•00 18400 Meehan Sonya K' S.W. Shore D532.85 532.85 C 1S133D & 13188 OR 94223 0.08911 0 aniel E. Tigard, rive 10 0.00 29 13500 Reid Dulie A• 13186 5•W • Sgore122D 532.85 0,08911 532.85 1S133DC ur g, & Tigard, OR 10 0.00 291 Arth Shore Drive A 532.85 W • C 13600 Miller Barbara N. 13114 S• 91223 0,08911 532.85 1S133D OR 10 0.00 292 Martin O• Tigard' Drive 532.85 . Store 13100 Oliar aulie C• & 131625.0 91223 10 0.08911 0 532.85 1S133DC Lloyd E• Ttga q,0 293 S•W • Shore Drive 532.85 C 13800 Tanaka Terrte 19. 13158 OR 91223 0•0g911 532.85 1S133D Craig R. Tigard' 10 0.00 294 Shore Drive $32.85 Collins 532 13146 S•0R 91223 C 13900 Dale A• Tigard, 0.08911 .85 10 0.00 295 1513 3D ~ Drive 33DC 14000 Bowman Kathryn M' 13134 S.W. Shore 532.85 OR, 91223 0.08911 296 151 Gary T• & Tigard, 10 Dave hty erly A• Store 14100 Doug Kttnb 13122 5•~R 91223 15133DC Dwight D• & Tigard, 291 C 14204 Graf Brenda D• 298 1S133D am on on 't pCT.2 1989 1548.01-60 Total ol,l, Right Ova} N' SSI+;CVs]~+11'~I ~ K Basic Assessment A UH L.1• 1+ INAL Trips Percent of Assessment Assessment (S) i~) v. 135TH AVFIT' Gen. Total ts) 532.85 CITY pF 7'IGARI~ Sy. LastNatne girstName Address 85 0,40 N1aP&Ta%LotNo. 11583 S•W• Winter Lake 10 0.08911 532 . • ~Dlro. 0.00 532.$5 amar Randall E. Dr• OR 97223 532.85 1S133DC 14300 H Lisa Ni• Tigard: 10 4.08911 299 Winter Lake 11607 S-W David M• & Dr. pR 97223 C 14400 Evans Stephanie A• Tigard, 300 1S133D rr^-'"j lliil~ Now Wpm 2 1989 0m, woo 01-60 OCT. ' 1548- Total d T ROLL Right•of-en Assessment AL ESSNIEN Basic Assessment tsl vLj']~[JFi L•I•D• FIN A,SS Trips Percent of Assessment tS) 135TH A Total (s) 0 532.85 OF TIGARD SAaaress ~e"~ .00 532-95 CITY FirstName 532.85 10 0.08911 LastName Tax 11621 S.W. Winterlake 23,179.1? LIDNo• Walter Cary ~ 0.00 Erieka Regina Drive OR 97223 23,179.17 15133DC 14500 Hoffman Tigard: 435 3.87631 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 266.46 301 p•O. Box 6400 6400 0.00 Beni. Franklin OR 97228- 266.46 2S14A 00501 Portland, 5 0,04456 302 DeV• Co- 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 0.00 266.46 P•O• Box 6400 6400 266.46 Beni. Franklin 97228- Q8900 portland, OR 5 0,04456 302-1 2514AB Dev, CO- 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blv 0.00 266.46 p,0, Boxland, OR 6400 8400 266.46 Benj. Franklin 97228- 5 0.04456 2514AB 49000 Port lvd • 302-2 DeV. Co' Hawthorne B 501 S.E. 0.00 266.46 p.0, Box 6400 6400 5 0.04456 266.46 09100 Benj. Franklin 2514AB Portland: OR 97228- 266.46 302-3 Dev. CO- 12485S. W, 128th Ave. 266.46 0,00 Robert 3• & Tigard, OR 97223 5 0,04456 09200 Domzalski Verna M• Blvd. 2S14AB 501 S•E, Hawthorne 266,46 302-4 Box 6400 6400 0.00 klin p•O• 9?228- 266.46 300 Ben)' Fran portland, OR 5 0,04456 302-5 2514AB 09 Dev. Co. 0.00 266.46 12228 S' W. 131st AVe• 3ameS R• Tigard, OR 97223 5 0.04456 266.46 09400 Hart Box 23454 302-6 2S14AB P•O' OR 97223 0,00 266.46 . 09540 D W D Tigard, 5 0.04456 26646 302-7 - 2S103 Contractors, 131st Ave- Inc- 3ames R• Tigard, 2S14AB 09600 Hart 302-8 low 0111M CITY OF TIGARll S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548=01-60 OCT. 2 ,1989 Trips Percentof Basic Right of-Way- Total LID No. Map&TaxLot No. LastName First Tame Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment (S) (s) 302-9 2S14AB 09700 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-10 2S14AB 09800 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-11 2S14AB 09900 Rislov Jarmila H. & 13145 S.W. Benish Ave. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 K. Sigurd Tigard, OR 97223 302-12 2S14AB 10000 Morris Donald C. & 12374 S.W. 132nd Ct. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Marie M. Tigard, OR 97223 302-13 2S14AB 10100 Woolery Calvin F. & 12356 S.W. 132nd Ct. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Rose M. Tigard, OR 97223 302-14 2S14AB 10200 Stewart Morse E. 12334 S.W. 132nd Ct. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Tigard, OR 97223 302-15 2S14AB 10300 Moyer Fred J. & 12300 S.E. 132nd Ct. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Pauline M. Tigard, OR 97223 302-16 2S14AB 10400 Hoffman Stephen R. & 3280 S.W. 170th, #2797 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Elizabeth A. Beaverton, OR 97006 302-17 2S14AB 10500 Medlin Timothy Lloyd 12343 S.W. 132nd Ct. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 & Lori E. Tigard, OR 97223 302-18 2S14AB 10600 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-19 2S14AB 10700 Beni. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 IlI =a MM 0" W" M I win MM ~I CITY OF TIGARD S...135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2 ,1989 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. Last Name First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) (S) 302-20 2S14AB 10800 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-21 2S14AB 10900 Brodesser Robert J. & 18235 S.W. Butternut St. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Karen D. Aloha, OR 97007 302-22 2S14AB 11000 Rickards Carol W. 12330 S.W. Morning Hill 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 302-23 2S14AB 11100 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-24 2S14AB 11200 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-25 2S14AB 11300 D E Anderson, 9363 S.W. Beaverton- 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Inc. Hillsdale Hwy. Beaverton, OR 97005 302-26 2S14AB 11400 D E Anderson, 9363 S.W. Beaverton- 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Inc. Hillsdale Hwy. Beaverton, OR 97005 302-27 2S14AB 11500 D E Anderson, 9363 S.W. Beaverton- 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Inc. Hillsdale Hwy. Beaverton, OR 97005 302-28 2S14AB 11600 D E Anderson, 9363 S.W. Beaverton- 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Inc. Hillsdale Hwy. Beaverton, OR 97005 302-29 2S14AB 11700 D E Anderson, 9363 S.W. Beaverton- 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Inc. Hillsdale Hwy. Beaverton, OR 97005 0CT.21999 oval eR*'"~'. 1545.(}1-~~ Right of `l a) Assessment Assessment SESSMENT RILL centof Basic ts~ low!~ woo., Assessment tst 266.46 r FINAL AS Trips per tsi . NUE L I V Tota► 0.00 Gen. r~ w,135TIA AVL Address 266.46 O,p4456 266.46 OF TIG ARV girstTame 5 0.00 CITY 00 S.W. Ranh Ct. 266.46 Lastl3ame 97221 0.04456 37 clap TaxLotNo H B Virginia Portland OR a Blvd. 5 266.46 LID14°• awthorn 0.00 Boone L• 501 S.E. 8 266.46 4AB 11800 Box 6400 91228-6400 5 0.04456 30 2S1 p. OR 302- Franklin portland, Blvd. 266.46 900 Dev. Co. Hawthorne 0.00 2S14AB 11 503. g°x 6400 266.46 302-31 91228-6400 266,46 5 0.04456 0.00 Franklin Portland:OR #3404 00 Benj• S.W.10lt-, 5 266.46 CO• 4200 OR 9140 0.04456 266.46 2S14AB 120 Dev. & w, 302-32 Steven Beaverton 5 0.00 Beverly $.lw Benish 266.46 3ohnson 12100 & 13192 OR 91223 5 0.04456 p.00 266.46 33 2S14AB Edmund H• Tigard, 0• 266.46 patrte7a M' A• 13154 S'D Benish Berger ' 91223St. 12200 2~930.~1 302- 2S14AB rguerite 302-34 Tigard, 5 04456 Ma Benish St. Tigardw• 0.00 ~g30.71 12300 Hellsten ~ 13116 S•Og 91223 0.49 arlotte J• , 55 011 3191.11 302-35 2S14AB Ch V . Kawthorne Blvd- 0.00 40 er Elizkue PO 2S14p'B 124 HoPP fan 302_36 ~Sgox 6400 91228-6400 466 3,191'11 60 0.53 15100.36 Benj. Franklin Portland:Ha tborne Blvd• B 04700 E 12,292.22 2S14A Dev• Co' P J S.B. 6400 -6400 5,808.14 302-37 in .130% OR 91228 149 O.g7131 532.85 Frankl por 0.00 Devl• Co. 5•W.135th Avenue 532,85 2S14AB 04702 302-38 gobert H. Tigard, OR 91223 gill 10 4.08911 Sunamoto 1197 5 S.) N. Morning 2S14AB 40140 Raymond F' & Dr. 343 OR 91223 w endy S• Tigard$ 4 Lee 002 304 2514AB =gyp ; 2010M won 004 NOR 11191IN mop= re" mmommm- too a OC•r, 2,1989 01.60 1548- Total NIEN`r ROLL flight of•Wap ASSESS Assessment Basic Assessment (51 E L.I.D. FINAL Address GenTrips' Percentof Assessment (5) RD S.W ,135'1 H AVENU Total (s) 0.00 0.40 CI 4,04 CITY OF TIGA JJnNo. FirstName 0 4,40400 o.ao LastNa,ne alcon Rise MapgzTa,cLotNo. 13254 S,W.F 532.85 ewood Dr' OR 97223 532.85 2S14AB 04201 1110 es, Inc. Tigard: 10 4.08911 345 Morning Hill 11985 S.W • 0.00 532.85 Alan F. & Dr. OR 97223 532.85 514AB 00300 GAS Barbara 3• Tigard, 10 0.08911 306 2 Morning Hill 11995 S•W• 0.00 532.85 Russel S• & Dr- OR 87223 532.85 40400 Lockrem Lynda P• Tigard, 10 0.08911 307 2S14AB ames H• & W • Morning Hill 12005 S• 0.00 532.85 3 00500 Parsley Marie E• D - d, OR 97223 10 0.08911 532.85 308 2S14AB Morning ill 12465 S.W. 532.85 David E• & 85 0.00 Dr' 97223 532• 00600 Waind Virginia F• Tigard OR , 10 0.48911 532 309 2S14AB Chimney 13295 S•W • 0.00 .85 Effie Pauline Ridge CtO.R 87223 532.85 °0700 Roberts Tigard, 10 0,08911 310 2514AB Chimney 13315 S•W' 0.00 532.85 Lawrence H• Ridge Ct0•R 97223 532.85 44800 Snyder be Carol Ni• Tigard, 10 4.08911 311 2S14AB S.W. Chimney 13335 0.00 532.85 Casey 3• & idge Cl- 44940 Rushing Bonnie A• Tigard, OR 97223 10 0,48911 532.85 312 2S14A8 Chimney 13355 S.W • 0.00 532.85 Scoot M. & Ridge Ct. 532.85 01004 Yale Barbara A• Tigard, OR 97223 10 4.08911 313 251416,13 W, Falcon Rise 13250 S• ewood Dr. OR 97223 314 2S14A3 01100 H 1 edg omes, inc. Tigard, CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2 ,1989 Trips Percentof Basic Right-of-way- Total LIDNo. Map&TaxLot No. Last Name First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment (S) (S) (S) 315 2S14AB 01200 Cummins Donald H. 13330 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Ridge Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 316 2S14AB 01300 Klatt Albert & Alice 1613 Broadway 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Vancouver, WA 98663 317 2S14AB 01400 Stevens Timothy, Craig 13290 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Steven R. Ridge Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 318 2S14AB 01500 Johnson William M. & 13270 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Carol R. Ridge Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 319 2S14AB 01600 Kimmel Douglas J. & 970 S.W. Mark Street 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Joyce Newport, OR 97365 320 2S14AB 01700 Kimmel Douglas J. & 970 S.W. Mark Street 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Joyce Newport, OR 97365 321 2S14AB 01800 Lassle Jeff J. 13235 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Ridge Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 322 2S14AB 01900 Hemrajani Jagdish G. 13230 S.W. Aberdeen 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Place Tigard, OR 97223 323 2S14AB 01990 Morning Hill 9055 S.W. Beav.-Hillsdale 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Home Owners Hwy. Association Portland, OR 97225 By Wedgewood Homes of Portland 324 2S14AB 02000 Brown Carl H. & 10900 S.W. 76th Place, 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Laura L. #13 Tigard, OR 97223 SM 00 OCT.2 1989 1548-01-60 Total T RO,1. Basic Right•of•H aY Assessment FINAL ASSESSMEN Assessment cs~ UFiL•I•~' Address Trips Percentof Assessment • t~) 532.85 135TH AVEN Geri. Total W 0.00 S,w CITY OF TIGARD 532.85 FirstName 10 0.08911 LastName Morning Hill LIDNO. Map TaxLotN1- 12184 S.W• 0.00 532.85 Roger 3. & Dr. 532.85 E• Tigard, OR 97223 2S14A'B 02100 Spring Deborah Hill 10 0.08911 325 Morning 532.85 F. & Vera 12196 S.W• 0,00 Dr' OF, 97223 532.85 02200 Rush Bohn Tigard, 10 O,p8911 326 2S14AB Morning Hill 12203 S.W. 0.00 532.85 Sohn A• & Dr. OR 97223 532.85 327 2S14AB 02300 Gillis 3anet E. Tigard, 10 0,08911 12210 S.W• Morning gill 532.85 K, Gordon & 0.00 Dr. OR 97223 532.85 02400 Scott Teri L• Tigard, 10 0,08911 328 2S14AB Morning Hill 12220 S.W • 0.40 532.85 Michael R• & Dr. OR 97223 532.85 02500 Kruse Teriann Tigard, 10 0.08911 329 2S14AB Morning Hill 12232 S•W • 0.00 532.$5 Sohn D• & Dr. OR 87223 532.85 02600 Bowden Victoria L. Tigard, 10 0.08911 330 2S14AB Morning Hill 12240 S.W • 0.00 532.85 Eileen G. Dr, OR 97223 532.85 331 2S14AB 02700 Rowe Tigard, 14 0,08911 orning Rill 12252 S.M. Morn! 0,0 532.85 4 Randal E. & Dr, 2S14AB OR 97223 532.85 02$40 Kashka Helen A• Tigard, 10 4,08911 332 Steven • Morning Hill & 12264 S•W • 0.00 Nl erance 97223 0'00 4'04 02940 Lesp Shawn Ni• Dr, Tigard, OR 4 q,04044 333 2S14AB Mark 970 S•W• OR g7365 Newport, 2S14AB 43000 Beni. Franklin 334 Development, inc. OEM now 2 1889 OCT. 01-60 mom ~ 548- TotaMOM i4~ l 000, OLL ht•of•~~a} A Basic ~S~IENT R Bid Assessment FIN AL SS'E Assessment isy L. Address Trips Percent Of Assessment ts1 IGARp W . 135TH AVENUE Gen Total csl 0.00 CITY OF 0.04 0.00 T FirstName 0 0.00000 gTLotNo. LastName Faleori Rise IADNo• Map ' 13250 S•W• 0.00 532.85 Dr' OR 97223 532.85 B 43001 H and K Tigard, 10 0.48911 335 2S14A investors Rise 13250 5•W • Falcon 0.00 532.85 ewood Dr. OR 97223 532.85 03100 ed e. Inc, Tigard, 10 0.08911 336 2S14AB Falcon Rise 13250 S•W. 4`00 532.85 ewood Dr' OR 97223 532.85 337 2S14AB 03200 HomeSy inc. Tigard, 10 0,08911 13250 S•W • Falcon Rise 0.00 532.85 ewood Dr- OR 97223 532.85 03304 W edg Tigard, 10 0.08911 338 2S14AB Homes, Inc. Rise 13250 S.W• Falcon 532.85 Dr. 0.00 H and K ard, OR 97223 532.85 03400 Tig 10 O.Q8911 9 2S14AB investors Scotts Bridge S•W' .85 33 Ronald R. 13367 4.04 532 & Dr. OR 87223 532.85 03500 Richardson Janice E. Tigard, 10 0.08911 340 2S14AB S.W. Scotts Bridge 532.85 13379 0 Sandra K• .40 Dr. OR 97223 532.85 0.08911 341 2S14AB 03600 McConnell Tigard, 10 .W ,Scotts Bridge 532.85 13405 S 0.00 Domintque & Dr. OR 97223 532.85 43700 Alexander Marion Tigard: 10 0.08911 342 25140 Scotts Bridge Richard G. & 13425 S•W Dr. 2S14AB 03800 York Carol E. Tigard, OR 970,23 343 1 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2, 1989 Trips Percentof Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. Last Name First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (s) (S) (5) 344 2S14AB 03900 Shepsman Adam, 8115 S.W. 61st 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Gertrude M., Portland, OR 97219 & Esther L. & James A. Hart 345 2S14AB 04000 Tinsman Robert F. & 13370 S.W. Scotts Bridge 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Claudia A. Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 346 2S14AB 04100 Shiels Stephen T. 525 Country Club Rd. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 347 2S14AB 04200 McMahon Dennis M. & 4547 Treeside Ct., NE 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Janice M. Salem, OR 97305 348 •2S14AB 04300 White. Kevin R. & P.O. Box 230535 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Donna M. Tigard, OR 97223 349 2S14AB 04500 Wedgewood 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Homes, Inc. Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 349A 2S14AB 08400 Wedgewood 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Homes, Inc. Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 349B 2S14AB 08500 Smith Betty Jo 13439 S.W. Scotts Bridge 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 349C 2S14AB 08600 Seybold Gregory W. & 13444 S.W. Scotts Bridge 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Debbie Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 349D 2S14AB 08700 Palmer Troy Allen & 13436 S.W. Scotts Bridge 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tania Kay Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 15-1-7 4 woo, won ems! Poo OCT.2 1989 00M 01.6"woo 1548- Total „ ROLL Basic Wight-of-11,211 Assessment FINAL ASSESSIVIENT Assessment (s) L.I.D• Trips Percentot Assessment (s) 135TH AVENUE Gen. Total (s) 0.p0 CITY OF 532.85 TIGAR,D S,W. Address FirstName 10 0,48911 532.85 LastName 0.00 $32.85 Map&Ta%LotNo• 1?23 N.W• Glisan 1IDNo. 97209 532.85 Robert L. Portland, OR. 10 0.08911 0.00 S14AB 08800 Elliott 532.85 349E 541 S.E- Hawthorne Blvd. 2 p.0, Box 6400 6404 532.85 Benj. Franklin 97228- . 04501 port Ia 9 O Blvd. 10 0.08811 350 2514AB Development, S. thorne .00 532.85 Inc. 501 0 P.10 . Box 6400 6400 532 $eni, Franklin Portland 97228- .85 600 anent, , OR Blvd. 10 4.08911 2S14AB 04 Develop orne 532.85 351 Inc. 501 S. E. Hawth 0 00 , p.0• Box 6400 6400 532.85 Beni. Franklin OR 97228- 04700 Developinept, Fort land, 10 p.08911 352 2514AB Inc. 13172 S•W• Chim ney 0.00 532.85 Daniel D. & Ridge St. R 97223 532.85 04800 Gorman Sharon L. Tigard, 10 0.08911 353 2514AB himney 532.85 13158 S.W. C 0.00 David B. & Ridge 5 ~R 67223 532.85 44904 Cory jean T. Tigard, 14 0.08911 354 2S14AB Chimney 532.85 13136 S•W • 0,00 Sohn M. & gidge 5 OR 97223 532.85 05000 Collins Monica L• Tigard, 10 0,08911 355 2S14AB 114 S.W. Chimney 0.04 532.85 13 Vance W • & Ridge S ~R 97223 $32.85 05100 Collins Joyce L. Tigard, 10 0.08911 S.%. Chimney 356 2514AB 532.85 13098 0.04 Donald H• & Ridge S OR 97223 532.85 2514AB 05200 Trachsel Karen L• Tigard, 10 0,08911 357 131s Larry t Avenue Douglas Tigard, 5.OR 97223 05300 Miller & 0meda Lyn 3 58 2514AB mom Now, 00 IPA "a son CT, 2 1g89 O Coral 1549-01.60 Ri~ht.of.~ti a) Assessment 010 NT g,OLL Basic Assessment (Sl 00 op L Ag~ES5ME s percentof Assessment ks) 532.85 4 FjNA Trip Total ks) p,40 HAVENUE~,.ID• Address Gen. 911 532.85 532.85 T o.0a 40 OF TIGARD S w' 135 girst~m"e venue 14 0• CITY ro LastName 12235 $•Og197223 0 p.0ag11 532.85 4• 532.85 LjDl+la. Map&TaacL°t Robert e. & Tigard, 131st Avenue 1 00 e Mlc W • 532.85 532.85 57 S• 3 0•08911 00 2g14AB 05400 flop Robert BruCeL. Tigard, OR 9722 Avenue 10 85 0• 359 Marcia S•W.131st 532• y32.g5 Williams 3r• 12279 OR gg223 0.08911 0,00 4A 05540 , & -1.0 360 2S1 B 1Viitcrell M Tigard' 131st Avenue 532.85 B oy6p0 McLain Dona & Sus T g an 122a8d~'~R 97223 ue it, 0.08911 0.44 532.85 2S14A Robe 31st Aven y32.85 85 361 B Gardner 12274 S•W• 197223 08911 532• 0• 4,00 362 2S14A 05700 DouglM• & Tigard, OR 131st Avenue 10 532.85 85 058 Stanley Joyce 12242 S.W• 97223 0.08911 00 532• 2S14AB p4 Douglas Tigard: OR pvenue 10 0. 363 Glenda S.W. 131st 532.85 532.85 B 05900 gelsick 12228 97223 to o.oa911 0.00 2S14A 31m B. Tigard, OR 31st Avenue 532.85 364 Ooo hart 12206 S. * 91223 10 0.08911 0.00 532.85 2S14AB 06 gal A, Tigard, W OIL .131st Avenue y32.85 95 365 32• B 00 Wiggins 30an 11 R. 12IB4 S*O 97223 e 10 0.08911 4.00 5 366 2S14A p61 Rands 3• TiPrdl 131st AVenu 532.85 ' 00 Orem Debr 12162 S,W. gg223 4.Oa911 532.$5 Avenue j0 0.04 367 2614AB 062 Brad & o aura Tigard: OR 131st 32,85 Millica 48 S • W• Roast 40 OR gg223 o.Oa911 532.85 lga 368 25 14AB p6300 3a n s A. & T' 121 rd1 s.W • 131st Avenue 10 1 532.85 4. 06440 Wong C 120g6 OIL 97223 10 4.0891 2S14AB Alice ll. Tigard' e St. atberl 369S ,W . K 2S14AB 06540 Salmi William & T pa d, OR 9223 370 Tibbetts Martha M' 2S14AB 06640 371 1989 on, OVA pp OCT. Total 000 105M.W J 548-pi- Wigbt.of.VW a) Assessment # T K,OLL Basic pssesssnent ts) 00k 090 NAL ASSE S~IEN Tries Perc,entof Assessment (s) 532.$5 Fj Total ts) 0.0 I.D• Gen. VEr1UE I'• Address 532.85 GAD 5'w, ~SSTH A FirstT''ame 10 0.08911 4.00 532.85 CITY OF TI LastWa'n a 13445 S,W .Katherine St. 1 532.85 532,$5 Map&TaxWotho. gg22 p.08g1 p.00 Mary Tigard: OR e St. 10 ~Dpo• Katherin 532.85 Crabtree Katherine 13461 S. 88223 p,08911 532.85 2S14Ag 06740 m J. & Tigard: OR ine St. 10 0.00 312 W illia S,W • 532.85 4AB 06800 Gonsalves Janice fl. 13089 Kather Op 91223 0.08911 532.85 2S1 ilia A. Tigard, 10 0.00 8q3 prise Katherine St. 532.$5 Miller 13121 S'~g. 81223 0.08911 532.$5 374 2$1410 069g0 James B. 6L Tigard: 0.44 atheriue St. 14 532.$5 OZ 0 Thayer Anne L' 13143 S.W • 972,23 0.08911 532.85 2S14NB Q4 3ames T• 8L Tigard' OK St. 1D 0.00 315 S.W. Katherine Keaff Debra K. 532.$5 911 532.85 St 10 0,08 0.00 2S14AB 07100 geith & T12,165 iga d' OR 912,13 376 David erine 532.85 Colby Karen 13181 S.W ` 9722,3 0,08911 2$14AB OQ2Q4 Donald E. & Tigard' OR St. 10 532.85 317 W • Katherin e 0.00 Br art Julie E• T 19d OIL 91223 532.85 532.85 2S14AB 07300 3. & James 14 0.08 811 0.40 318 Kathy F S~hlOtf eldt S.W . Katherine St' 532.85 2614A5 Z1400 Berning 13146 OR 97223 0.08911 319 Christine L• Tigard, 10 $32.85 W Katherine St' 0.00 Berger 13134 S• 91223 532.95 2$140 OR500 James C• 8c Tigard, O. R 14 0.08911 ©.00 532.85 380 0 Sloan Patrick N. W • 128th pvenue 532.85 2S14AB 4260 Andrus 12295s- 91223 Q•08911 381 Roger C' & Tigard OR Avenue , 1 40 Heath Dianne S. 12015 S.W1 91223 OR 2 2S14AB 011 Robin T' & Tigard: 38 ~ sill Anita G. 2S14AB OZg04 O N 393 MR wl-q M" w" MM N" XMq ar-1 CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2 1989 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. Last Name First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment 384 2S14AB 08300 Laverty R. Lyle & 13169 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Pamela S. Ridge St. Tigard, OR 97223 385 2S14AB 08200 Kirk Brent P. & 13147 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Pamela B. Ridge St. Tigard, OR 97223 386 2S14AB 08100 Burke Bernard V. & 13125 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Genevieve C. Ridge St. Tigard, OR 97223 387 2S14AB 08000 Adams Randall L. & 13103 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Linda L. Ridge St. Tigard, OR 97223 388 2S14AB 07900 Florey Gary D. 13091 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Ridge St. Tigard, OR 97223 389 2S14BA 00100 Walter West 223 Green Mt. Drive 701 6.24666 37,353.15 0.00 37,353.15 Corp. Palm Desert, CA 92260 c/o Heldfond, Ruth D. 390A 2S14B 00101 Krueger Margery F. Rt. 1, Box 792 449 4.00107 23,925.19 0.00 23,925.19 Beaverton, OR 97007 391 2S14BA 00200 Peterschmidt Stephen J. & 12133 S.W. 135th 42 0.37426 2,237.96 0.00 2,237.96 Vicki D. Friday Tigard, OR 97223 392 2S14BA 00300 Delucia Linda R. 12098 S.W. Westburg 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 393 2S14BA 00400 Hammer Gary L. & Lisa 12032 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 A. Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 Mimi RM" P=9 In."" -7 CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 OCT. 2 1989 Basic Right-of-Way Total Trips Percent of LID No. Map&TazLol No. LastName First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment (S) (S) (S) 394 2S14BA 00500 Cuyler Thomas P. & 12054 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Roxanne & Terrace Robert J. Tigard, OR 97223 395 2S14BA 00600 McGehee James K. P.O. Box 25571 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Portland, OR 97225 396 2S14BA 00700 Coon Mary Ann R. 12098 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 397 2SABA 00800 Geonetta Patrick, 12112 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Spinuzzi, & Terrace Julie Tigard, OR 97223 398 2S14BA 00900 McGehee James K. P.O. Box 25571 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Portland, OR 97225 _.Now VOR GC~'.2.19g9 15A8-Oj-6a Tnw' \V a~ Righ~•°f" ' Assessment goo 13asic Assessorent tsl low S~gF,N`r FINAL ASSFA Trips Yercentof Asse~~me"t ls) 532.85 ~ D. Tutai q,p4 Address 532.85 w.13~TH ~vE`NUF'LGen 85 OFTIGARD ~ girst~ai,►e bury 10 4.48911 ,85 0.00 532. CITY Last~an'e S.W • W est 532 10 p,0$911 0 532.85 Ta%otlvo. 12232 OR 917,23 Map & yito N• Tigard, 0.0 giscitelli S,W • W estbury 532,85 A012p0 12254 OR 91223 10 0.08811 532.85 401 2S14B Rhonda M• Tigard, Ct- 0.00 gA413 Bennett W .11indon 532.85 00 13858 s• 91223 p•08911 402 2514 Br! .4. & R• Tigard, OR on Ct. 10 00 532.85 14BA41400 Yilmer Diane S.M.223 532.85 2.85 403 25 P,mtr M• Tag 10 0.08911 0,00 53. 01500 yatehi Carol L. Hindon Ct. 532.85 444 2S1413 Cutting 13992s- O ~ 91223 10 0.08911 00 532.85 Robert M• Tigard' on Ct• 1 0. Odell, 3r' SS y~, Hind 532.85 532•g5 • 445 2S14BA01640 Kenneth C. Tigard, OR 9Z22on 10 0.0891 0,00 on 532•85 00 3ohnson Carla C. 23 S.W. Hind t 2S14BA 017 L•, 3r. Tigard, OR 91223 10 0.08911 0.00 532.85 406 Gordo" Damron & Deborah K• 13901 S.W • H3nd23 Ct• 11 532.85 2S14BA 01800 Robert F' & Tigard: OR 912 lvd. 10 0.p89 401 W , Allen B 532.85 81900 Draga Cathleen 1'• 10400 S. OR gZg05 4•p0 408 2S14BA $eaVerton, 532.85 10 0.08811 532.85 gerb 2S14BA 02Q00 Morissette Ct. 4.04 409 guilders, S•W . Hindon 532.85 111c. Kathryn C. Tigard? OR 92223 ve, 10 0.08911 0 532.85 02100 Dorsett 12483 S.W• W91223 A 1 532.85 q.d 2S14B~ & Tigard, OR 10 0.4891 L P'ye, 410 Dunn Carol 3 • • S• 922Wilto23 2S14BA 022 D 04 avid A• T ga d, Olt 411 n Rickard Margaret 02300 2S1413N S' 412 pC`C.2 X989 tal sew-"', L 548'p4 -6 R,Sht'ot•« a~ A s wnent WOMM, ~4 10101A SSESS~IENT x'GL 'i3asic Assessment (s) Al, Percent of Assessment ts) otal ts) 532.85 FII~ A Trips • -NUF`, 1,1.n• T 0.00 Gen. D S W , 35TH A~' 1{' Address 532.85 1q 0.08911 1.40 532.85 pg T1GAK F*Irstlrante p ve- CITY y.'.0oaue S.W . Wilton 532.85 g.TaXLotl`lo. & 12049 OR gg223 0.08911 $32.85 Map . 0 ylvrlo. Steven A' nn Tigard, . 1 0•00 Klein Margaret Gt Ly S.W . Crist 532.85 532.85 14BA 02 91223 413 2S 14 1.48911 1.00 400 David K. & Tigard : OR Booth Mary Patricia S' V. Crist Ct. 532.85 532.85 2S14BA 02500 13916 R 97223 1,08911 414 Lamers Bill M• ie L• Tigard, 0 W Grist Ct. 14 532.85 4.40 532 Debb 13938 S. • 14 0.48811 .85 OR 91223 4,14 415 '15,413N 02600 30 hn Y. & Tigard' A p2100 pr fillips Kristi A• , Grist Ct• 532,85 532.85 13809 W OR 81223 1.08911 2S14B alai G• & Tigard, 10 1.40 istine M• Crist Ct. 532.85 32 416 P S.W . 0,18911 5.85 08600 Welty Kr 91223 33GD 138 14 0.00 411 151 Matthew K' & Tigard, 0 ' Crist Ct• 532.85 081 Miller Ile W , 91223 1S133GD 44 cha d 3. & T,a d,•OR ve• 10 0.48911 q.q4 532.85 418 R 532. 3CD 08844 Perry Lisa M• & 12g21a '~R 81223 lq 0.08911 8 419 1513 532. 3erry M' M• Tigard, ning Hill 0 85 Thomas Barbara S,W , Mor q,4 GD 08940 11147 532.85 420 15133 Gary T. 8L Drive (31223 0.08911 Tigard, OR gill 10 532.85 09000 Bourson Debra S 0.40 1S133CD .W , Morning 111 421 D. 8L 63 five 3 4.089 1 532.85 $32.85 Thor Dr OR 9122 1 Dorsett j3randl L- Tigard, 10 1.00 09100 W , W ilton Ave. 532.85 422 15133CD 11992 S• OR 91223 1q 6.08911 532.85 Daniel B. 8L Tigard, AVe• 0•p0 09200 Grimberg Kimberly C. W' Wg1223 532.85 12014 S' OR 0.08911 15133CD David D• Tigard, 1q Ave. 423 R • Wilton 09300 Henderson Tracey 3- 12036 S•W 81223 424 1 S133CD Margaret A. Tigard, 0 2S14BA 02800 Wilson 425 ONION OWN Or A Or" QCT• 2 1989 log 15~8.p1'60 Total Assessment own Bight-ol-," SESSMErIT RQLL Ilasic Assessment (S) woo w7v, FINAL A~ percentot Assessment tsl AvENUEL•I•D- dress 'Trips Total W 0.00 532532.85 5 W •1S5TYI Aa 532.85 ~'irstName Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 ,85 CITY Q 0.00 F TIGAR'D 1„astNan1e W, . Map&TOL000• 12458 OR 97223 0.08911 532.85 L1UN0• 130rma R. Tigard, 10 0.00 2S14BA 02900 Nordi. 12070 S•W • Wilton Ave. 532,8 Ma T. Tigard, OR 97223 10 0.08911 532.85 426 5 Sammons lAa caret E. W • W estbury 0,00 BA 03000 12181 S. 427 2514 3ohn be Mae B• Terrace 3 532.85 OR 9722 40911 2514BA 43100 Hong Tigard, W estbury 10 532.85 428 12169 S.W • 0.00 & Terrace 532.85 Richard A' 97223 Stepp Kendra J• Tigard, OR 10 4,08911 2S14BA 03200 W estbury 532.85 429 12487 S•W' 0.04 Kevin I,. Terrace OR 91223 8911 532.85 532 Bartlholome Tigard, 10 0. 0.85 03300 0.00 532.85 430 2S14BP' w P.O. Box '155,11 James K• Portland, OR 10 4,08911 McGehee W • Allen Blvd. 532.85 251 13N 03400 10400 S• 91005 431 Beaverton, op 4.00 gerb 532.85 0.08911 532.85 432 2S14SA 03500 Morissette 10 0.00 guilder, P.O. Box 2,5511 225 532.85 Inc. OR 97 4.08911 3ames K• Portland} 10 532.85 03600 McGehee W . W estbuT`1 0.00 2S14BA & Karri 12001 5• 532.85 433 Paul S. Terrace OR 91223 0.08911 Carpenter Tigard, 14 09400 S.W • W estbury 434 16133CD 11985 Jeffery L• Terrace OR 91223 Agmer Tigard, , 1S133CD 09500 435 ~ T • 2 1989 pC 54801.60 T°~l 1 Right•oGW a5 Assessment goLL Basic As$e5sment t51 Now ASSESSME~T percentot Assessment ts} $5 532. F1I`SA Trips Total t$? Q.OQ D• Gen. Ajdress Gen. 532.$5 13TkI AVENUE I' 0.48911 p~ ~GARD S w F'irstNan1e 14 CITY T $•W , W estbury LastN~e 11963 Map&Ta%J otNo iro Diane TerTgee QA 91223 Tigard, ke 1$133GD aggp0 Dra , 436 E. 4 r._ CITY OF TIGARD, OREIGODT COUNCIL AGENDA ITEK SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 9. 1989 DATE SUHKMTD: September 28, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TME: PREVIOUS ACTION: Retention Schedule Ordinance ItiIII PREPARED BY: N. Robinson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK- REQUESTED BY: L. Wilson POLL ISSUE Should city Council revise the retention schedule adopted in 1984? 1NFOMEMON SUMMARY E In 1984, City Council adopted the statewide general retention schedule, developed by the State Archivist, as the City's guideline for retention and l destruction of records. Over the last year, staff has been working with the State Archivist's office to develop a schedule tailored to the city's informational needs. The proposed schedule allows better control of City records by identifying the records being retained, specifying optiimmi retention periods, and providing for the destruction of records when they are no longer of value. The Oregon Revised Statutes require the State Archivist's approval of retention schedules, and the proposed schedule has received that approval. The retention periods specified in the schedule supersede those listed in the Oregon Administrative Rules general schedule. r E ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Keep the current general retention schedule as the city retention schedule. 2. Adopt the attached ordinance to implement the retention schedule developed for the City of Tigard. 3. Decline action at this time. FISCAL MRACP 1. N/A 2. Enhance space utilization and reduce risk exposure in the record destruction process through the implen*xrtation of the ordinance. 3. N/A ACTION SUGGESTED Alterative #2: motion to approve ordinance. { REVISED: August 23, 1989 TIGARD QTY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone Wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item should sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGUM sign-p sheet(s). If no sheet is available, AUGUST 28, 1989, 6:30.04 ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the H TIGARD CMC CENTER beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's H H 13125 SW HALL BLVD. agenda items are asked to be two minutes or E' TIGARD, OR 97223 less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator. 6:30 o STUDY SESSION - Coalition for Responsible Prison Siting - Brenda MacLeod (6:30- 6:45 p.m.) - Metropolitan Area Communications Commission Representatives - Bruce Crest and Paula Manley (6:45 - 7:15 p.m.) 7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Corder and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 • Call to Council and Staff for Nan Agen da Itgms.. 7:35 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please) 7:A0 3. CONSENT AGFIM: These items are considered to be routine and may be ( enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve Council Minutes: July 17 and 24, 1989 3.2 Approve Resolution Supporting Expeditious Land Use Analysis, Preliminary Engineering and Right-of-Way Acquisition for the Western Bypass Corridor - Resolution No. 89-46 3.3 Approve Resolution Supporting City of Gaston's Membership in the Md=cpoli tan Area Communications Com ni.ssion (mAcc) Res. #89- 4d . 3.4 Approve Resolution Welcoming the Head Start Center to Tigard- Resolution No. 89-1°7 3.5 Approve Resolution Appropriating Donations to the City of Tigard- Resolution No. 89-fg_e~ 3.6 Approval of Greenburg Road/Cascade Boulevard Traffic Signal Project for Inclusion in the 1989-90 Streets Capital Improvement Budget ' 3.7 Recess Council Meeting; cmwe ne local Contract Review Board (LCRB) Meeting: Authorize the City Administrator to Approve all Necessary Documents to Acquire Patdbin Property for S.W. McDonald Street Bond Project; Adjourn LC12B; Reoomvene Council Meeting I 3.8 Authorize Mayor's Signature oan:At to Implement Yard Debris Recycling with Washington County - Resolution No. 89- 7:45 7:45 4. REFCET CN TRAIN NESTLES IN CITY T NITS t o Community Development Staff 7 5. PRESEiVTA ON BY PARK BOARD - Update on park Levy G COUNCIL AGENDA - AuGusT 28, 1989 - PAGE 1 E.. i 8:00 6. Rk~ ON DLU4 M ROAD SAFETY o Ccatumity Development Staff 8:10 7. PUBLIC HFARIlJG . ZONE CSwM ANNEX MCK ZCA 89-06 DANIEL; NPO #3 For a zone change fractt Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard R-7 zoning designation. ZONE: Presently R-6 County (Residential, 6 units per acre, Washington County) IACATION: South end of 135th Avenue (WCIM 2S1 4, Tax Lot 700) o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations or Challenges o Stmmation by Comity Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross O=ination o Recommendation by Comainity Developent Staff o Council Questions or Comnents o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council 9:10 8. NUJ-A021DA ITEMS: Fri Council and Staff 9:15 9. F:X=TPIVE SESSION: Vie-' Tigard City Council will go : into Ewcative session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 9:30 10. ADUCURIIMiNP oca828 _ s r { r r F COMCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 2 € F TI MRD CI'T'Y COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR NEE niG AGENM agenda item should sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, AUGUST 28, 1989, 6:30 PM ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the TIGARD CIVIC CENTER beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's 13125 SW HALL BLVD. agenda items are asked to be two minutes or TIGARD, OR 97223 less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator. 6:30 o STUDY SESSION - Metropolitan Area Communications Cmmti.ssion Representatives - Bruce Crest and Paula Manley 7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call to Council and Staff for Non Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please) 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve Council Minutes: July 17 and 24, 1989 3.2 Approve 'Resolution Supporting ENpeditious Land Use Analysis, Preliminary Engineering and Right-of-Way Acquisition for the Western Bypass Corridor - Resolution No. 89- 3.3 Approve Resolution Supporting City of Gaston's Membership in the Metropolitan Area Communications Comaission (MACC) Res. #89- 3.4 Approve Resolution Welcoming the Head Start Center to Tigard- Resolution No. 89- 3.5 Approve Resolution Appropriating Donations to the City of Tigard- Resolution No. 89- 3.6 Approval of Greenburg Road/Cascade Boulevard Traffic Signal Project for Inclusion in the 1989-90 Streets Capital Improvement Budget 3.7 Recess Council Meeting; Convene In--al Contract Review Board (LL:ZB) Meeting: Authorize the City Administrator to Approve all Necessary Documents to Acquire Patchin Property for S.W. McDonald Street Bond Project; Adjourn LCRB; Reconvene Council Meeting 4. REPORT ON TRAIN MUSTLES IN CITY LIMITS o Ccmuminity Development Staff 5. P.RESFn%TION BY PARK BOARD - Update on Park Levy 6. REPORT ON DURHAM ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS o Coammunity Development Staff OOUNCM AGENDA - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 1 7. PUBLIC BEARTW, - ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 89-06 DANIEL,; NPO #3 For a zone change from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard R-7 zoning designation. ZONE: Presently R-6 County (Residential, 6 units per acre, Washington County) ID=ON: South end of 135th Avenue (W= 2S1 4, Tax Lot 700) o Public Hearing Opened - o Declarations or Challenges t o Smmtion by Community Development Staff 4 o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination E o Recoamiendation by Ccmnminity Development staff o Council Questions or Ca mtients i o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council 8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: Fran Council and Staff 1 9. EXBCITPIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 10. ADJOLTR 14EN ' r` cca828 r i COUNCIL AGIIM - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 2 AGENDA UPDATE - CITY COUNCIL M]MnrJM AUGMT 28, 1989 o STUDY SESSION - Coalition for Responsible Prison Siting - Brenda MacLeod (6:30- 6:45 p.m.) OC cows: aclaowledged need for prison is very clear and would not object to a Wash. Co. lotion; however two sites identified were not diesi r~e; other sites in the State would be better suited which meet criteria. - Metropolitan Area ammtunications Co~sion Representatives - Bruce Crest and Paula Manley (6:45 - 7:15 p.m.) Update and review of services offered including local studio with equipment available for use. - Council discussion: Jo concerned noise ordinance, as proposed may be too restrictive. Staff advised DEQ has zvviewed. - Development of Hudson Property: OC discussion on per; review to be a Director's Decision and he can approm, modify, or forward the deci.sicn to the Planning Commission. 1. BUSINESS MEETING Roll Call: All present 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA: Martha Bishop, 10590 S.W. Cbok lane; Virginia A. Brown, 13365 S.W. Cook Iam; Dave Hammes 10740 S.W. EIELirhaven Way; and Dennis Moc nier, 10634 S.W. Cock lam: canoerns expressed about development of Hudson Station Site. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: 3.1 Approve Council Minutes: July 17 and 24, 1989 3.2 Approve Resolution Supporting Expeditious Land Use Analysis, Preliminary Engineering and Right-of-Way Acquisition for the Western Bypass Corridor - Resolution No. 89-65 3.3 Approve Resolution Supporting City of Gaston's Membership in the Metropolitan Area Cammmications Commission (MACC) Res. #89-66 3.4 Approve Resolution Welcani.ng the Head Start Center to Tigard- Resolution No. 89-67 3.5 Approve Resolution Appropriating Donations to the City of Tigard- Resolution No. 89-67 3.6 Approval of Greenburg Road/Cascade Boulevard Traffic Signal Project for Inclusion in the 1989-90 Streets Capital Improvement Budget 3.7 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) Meeting: Authorize the City Administrator to Approve all Neoessary Documents to Acquire Patchin Property for S.W. McDonald Street Bond Project; Adjourn LCRB; Reconvene Council Meeting 3.8 Authorize Mayor's Signature on Agreement to Implement Yard Debris Recycling with Washington County - Resolution No. 89-69 0oun cil Review: Item 3.7 - Ea/Jo UA Jo/Ea UA - (all of consent w/o 3.7) ; Spike Friedman, 10575 S.W. Cascade expressed support for Item 3.6 4. REPORT ON TRAIN WHISTLES IN CITY IMV1ITS I4epart received from citizen, Toby Padgett. City AC7~ni cl-r-atp~ updated. CC pis: City A~nini -,-at,o~ to petition PUC for no train whistles in the City of Tigard between the hoes of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. I' 5. PRESENTATION BY PARK BOARD - Update on Park Levy Steve Slabgugh, Park Board rep tative reviewed efforts of PAC, Citizens for Tigard, with regard to 9/19 election. f 6. REPORT ON DLkZHAP4 ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Update by city Ifigineer 7. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 89-06 DANIEL; NPO #3 For a zone change from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard R-7 zoning designation. ZONE: Presently R-6 County (Residential, 6 units r per acre, Washington County) LOCATION: South end of 135th Avenue (WCIM., 2S1 4, Tax Lot 700) ~ o Public Hearing Opened o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council: Ordinance No. 89-22 3-2 with Jo and End Nay - 2nd reading on 9/11/89 f 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS: None R i 9. FIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 9:53 under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. r 10. AWOURNNENT: 10:40 cca828 s 4 1 F @@i ft E s z T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L MMING MNUITES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - 6:30 PM 1. ROE,L CUL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors Carolyn Eadon (arrived at 6:46 p.m.), Valerie Johnson, Joe Kasten and John Schwartz. Staff Present: Patrick Reilly, City Administrator; Jerry Offer, Associate Planner (arrived at 7:10 p.m.); Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder, Randy Wooley, city Engineer (arrived at 6:50 p.m.) E 2. STUDY SESSION: f i a. Prison Sitincr: Brenda MacLeod from the Coalition for Responsible Prison Siting fram the North Plains area noted her concerns with the process of the siting oommittee in determining the areas which would be considered for a prison. She noted this represented a dangerous precedent by usurping land use laws and was concerned that local needs would not be taken into consideration. She advised that other sites, which meet all of the criteria, were welcoming the possibility of a prison. After Council discussion, consensus was that the need for an additional prison in Oregon was very clear. Council would not object to a Washington county location; however, the two sites identified in Washington County were not desirable. Council agreed that other sites in the state would be better suited which would meet the criteria. b. Metropolitan Area Communications Communication (MACC) Representatives: Bruce Crest, Administrator, and Paula Manley, Manager of Tualatin Valley Connunity Access (TVCA) reviewed with Council their current work activities. Mr. Crest outlined MACC's E various functions, including cable franchise regulations, construction monitoring, consumer protection, and their management of the public comminications network. t' Ms. Manley advised TVCA was a little over a year old. The South f Center studio, located in Tigard, was the newest addition. TVCA offers training for community organizations and school children in producing their own video broadcasts at no charge. Ms. Manley presented a short video which was put together by a 4th grade r: class. (Councilor Eadon arrived at 6:46 p.m.) Mr. Crest noted MACC served 50,000 subscribers (up 10,000 from last year). This represents a population of 300,000. He noted their newest cable operator, Columbia Cable of Oregon, appeared to be working quite well. He advised that a consumer coordinator had been hired to deal with consumer inquiries. COUNCIL MnRn!TS - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 1 l' Council was apprised that Tigard Council meetings were now shown in all of Tigard on Government Access Channel 21. C. Noise Ordinance: Councilor Johnson noted the Noise Ordinance, as proposed, may be too restrictive. Staff advised DEQ has reviewed the ordinance and did not register any areas of concern with regard to enforceability. Discussion followed on outside factors which may add to a noise issue such as highway traffic acccupanying a noise producing activity by a business. Council consensus was that they would review this carefully to assure this did not represent an overreaction to an isolated incidence. i d. Hudson Station property - Staff advised that neighbors have indicated concern about the development of the Hudson Station property (NPO #3 area). Council discussed this issue briefly noting that the final decision on development would be a Director's Decision as provided by the Tigard municipal code (SIC). The TMC allows the Director to approve, modify, or forward the decision to the Planning Conunission. 3. VISITMIS AG MA I i a. Martha Bishop, 10590 S.W. Cook ]Lane, Tigard, Oregon, read her testimony into the record; she distributed the text of her cornets to Council. The subject of her testimony was the Hudson Station property and adjacent land. A copy of her presentation has been filed with the Council packet material. p. Ms. Bishop noted concerns with underground gasoline tanks and possible contamination from these tanks which have been in place for years. She referred to the developer's plan which called for a t retention pond and outlined her apprehensions with this proposal. b. Virginia A. Brown, 13365 S.W. Cook Lane, Tigard, Oregon, also testified on the development of the Hudson property. She noted concerns about traffic. She suggested that Watkins Street be made a one-way street to alleviate potential problems. Another item of concern was protection from water runoff from the property once it was developed. F C. Dave Hammes, 10740 S.W. Fairhaven Way, Tigard, Oregon, noted concerns with the traffic pattern for this property. He said. traffic should be controlled on Watkins Street to avoid traffic- flow difficulties. d. Dennis Moonier, 10634 S.W. Cook Lane, Tigard, Oregon, advised he was also concerned about the development of the Hudson property. He noted frustration over the difficulty in obtaining information from the City on the development. He said he felt that the plans for this proposal had been submitted but there was a time delay j COUNCIL MENUJIES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 2 F' i before the plans were made available for the public to review. City Attorney noted that once the applicant submits his application, the material becomes a public document. Discussion followed on the process wherein it was noted that NPo comments would be received before the Director's Decision was prepared; the public cmm*nt period would be held open until after September 6, 1989, to provide an opportunity for the NPO to review, at their meeting. 4. QfMENT AGENDA,: 4.1 Approve Council Minutes: July 17 and 24, 1989 4.2 Approve Resolution Supporting Keditious Land Use Analysis, Preliminary Engineering and Right-of-Way Acquisition for the Western Bypass Corridor - Resolution No. 89-65 4.3 Approve Resolution Supporting City of Gaston's Membership in the Metropolitan Area COMMUnicati.ons Commission (MACC) Res. #89-66 4.4 Approve Resolution Welcoming the Head Start Center to Tigard- Resolution No. 89-67 4.5 Approve Resolution Appropriating Donations to the City of Tigard- Resolution No. 89-68 4.6 Approve of Greenburg Road/Cascade Boulevard Traffic Signal Project for Inclusion in the 1989-90 Streets Capital Improvement Budget 4.7 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Focal Contract Review Board (LCRB) Meeting: Authorize the City Administrator to Approve all Necessary Documents to Acquire Patchin Propert-~ for S.W. McDonald Street Bond Project; Adjourn LCRB; Reconvene Council Meeting 4.8 Authorize Mayor's Signature on Agreement to Klement yard Debris Recycling with Washington County - Resolution No. 89-69 a. Spike Friedman, 10575 S.W. Cascade, Tigard, Oregon, expressed support for Item .6, (Greenburg Road/Cascade Boulevard Traffic Signal Project). City Council Meeting was Recessed b. Council convened as the Local Contract Review Board. Motion by Board member Kasten, seconded by Board member Johnson, to approve Consent Agenda Item .7. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. City Council Meeting Reconvened C. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to approve the Consent Agenda as proposed (less item .7 which was considered separately). The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of council present. COUNCIL NMgUTES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 3 d. Councilor Kasten noted that Item .5 represented a donation of $350 to the K-9 unit of the Police Department. He caamnented that there were citizens within the city who were so appreciative of some of the services offered that they make voluntary contributions. In this instance a citizen has requested that this money be used as discretionary funds within that division. He said both the City and Council was most appreciative of these contributions. 4. IUMICM ON TRAIN VNEESMES IN CITY T UMM a. City Adnuxiistrator advised that, in research conducted by staff on s a whistle-free zone, it was learned that the Public Utilities Commission has the ultimate responsibility and authority for designating whistle-free zones in the City limits. This review can be triggered in two different ways: First, there can be a citizen petition (with as few as 12 names) asking for the PUC to trigger the review. The second method would be initiated by a request of the City government. The request can be a neutral request or a: positive request in the sense that the City favors the establishment of a whistle-free zone. The PUC will review the request and make a determination whether restricting whistling would create safety problems. In its review, the PUC may decide to issue the restriction on whistling for selected times or selected 1 crossings. It was exclusively within their purview to make this ' decision. City Administrator advised that, if it was the Council's wish to have the whistle-free zone examined for applicability in Tigard, it was his recaanwz4ation that the Council ask him to draft a letter asking the PUC to give consideration to establishment of whistle- free zone in the City of Tigard. b. Toby Padgett, 8775 S.W. Commercial Street, Apt. No. 5, Tigard, Oregon, advised that when she last spoke to the Council she asked they petition the Oregon PUC to prohibit train whistles frcan sounding within the City limits. She said she wished to amend that ` request and ask that train whistles be prohibited from sounding in Tigard between the hours of 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., seven days a week, unless the engineer determines an emergency situation exists at the upcoming crossing. Ms. Padgett cited several cities which now have whistle-free. ordinances and advised they work well. She noted she had a copy of a letter sent to Mayor Edwards from DEQ which stated they supported and would assist Tigard in petitioning the PUC to prohibit the noise pollution caused by train whistles at night. Ei C. Mayor acknowledged receipt of the DEQ letter as referred to by Ms. Padgett in her testimony. He said the City Administrator was authorized to initiate a letter to the PUC exploring whistle-free zones for Tigard. i COUNCIL HDRM S - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 4 d. Councilor Johnson noted that safety would be the overriding concern in any request for whistle-free zones. 5. WMXM BY PARK BOARD - EEDATE (IN PARK LEVY a. Mr. Steve Slabaugh, Chairman of the Park Board, noted the status of . the efforts with regard to the levy which would appear on the mail- in ballot for park funding. He advised a Political Action Committee had been formed by the name of Citizens for Tigard. He noted funds were raised to help in the efforts to pass the levy. The PAC has (or will be): o put up yard signs throughout the City o mailed letters to registered voters within the City o held interviews with the press o distributed fliers throughout the om minty which outlined the amount of funds necessary to make the park improvements o mailed letters to editors of local papers He said they were optimistic the levy would be successful. b. Councilor Eadon thanked Mr. Slabaugh and the volunteers who worked hard on this process. She referred to the investment in the future and the important role that parks development play for Tigard. She said, as Tigard continued to grow, parks would became ( even more important. Establishment of parks that provide a variety of services was critical. The ballot issue represented at least two years of very hard work and planning. 6. DUEEM 10M SAFETY 12MR143VEMENTS a. City Engineer reviewed the presentation presented by students from Twality Junior High School Students about safety concerns on Durham Road. He said he wanted to update Council on this issue: - Speed Limit Concerns. The City cannot change the speed limit i without approval of the State Speed Control Board. Staff has requested the State Speed Control Board to review the speed i limit and has suggested recent development may warrant a reduced speed limit. The State acknowledged this request in June. It typically takes about three months for the State to complete their review and issue a report. - Dips in the Road. Site distance was made even more difficult at some intersections because of the dips in the road. The brush removal program along the roadside has been more frequent and closer to the ground than other areas of the 1 City. - Traffic Signals. Recently, council approved an agreement with the State Highway Department for installation of a signal at COUNCIL MURYIES - AUMST 28, 1989 - PAGE 5 Ell Hall & Durham funded under the Transportation Safety Improvement Bond Project. Design is underway by the State Highway Division and should go to bid late this year and be constructed in early 1990. School Bus Boarding. Since viewing the video presentation last June, staff has learned that the school bas schedules and routes were such that those students did not need and were not supposed to cross the road. There will be efforts to correct this. Also, school starting times have been changed at Twality Junior High this next school year; school will be starting about one-half hour later this year. This means students will, for the most part, not need to be crossing Durham Road or walking along Durham Road daring the peak morning cmm ute traffic hours. Truck Restrictions. This was reviewed and implemented before the concerns were discussed last June. City Engineer reviewed that truck restrictions were extended when Durham Road first became a City street. Review of Problems. City Engineer noted in early August he brought a group of people together who were familiar with the problems on Durham Road. He said the group consisted of representatives from. the School District, city staff (including the Police Department), NPO representative, and the citizen (Donna Worsley) who helped the students put together their presentation. City Engineer advised this was an informal, but very productive, discussion with identification of several programs which would be implemented at the beginning of the school year. The School District was reviewing with the school bus company some revisions to the school bas routes to avoid having pick- up and drop-off locations on Durham Road. It now looks as if the School District will be able to eliminate junior high and elementary students from being picked up by the school bas on Durham Road. There probably will still be some stops for high school students on Durham Road. Through the School Resource officer of the Police Department, an educational program has been scheduled. This includes safety training for pedestrians and bicyclists. City Engineer noted the group talked of the need for education of parents as well. Parents should be made aware of the school bus regulations and where students should cross and be knowledgeable of safety routes and programs established by the School District. Adults should also follow safety rules in crossing roads and riding bicycles. A parent educational program was noted by the discussion group as well. COUNCIL MMUMS - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 6 T f In the cases where bus stops were not able to be eliminated along Durham Road, the group talked of ways which could be quickly and inexpensively created for students to wait off of the pavement so they would not be in the traffic lanes. Once k the new school bus routes are established, specific solutions will be identified. City Engineer noted he thought there were t probably a couple of locations where the City could rather quickly respond before the rainy season and provide a better surface where the students could stand clear of the side- street pavement. This would also require coordination with the school bus drivers so they understand why students cannot reach the bus as quickly. The students had suggested more police patrol. City Engineer noted the police had always given concentrated patrol in the school areas, especially in September when school first starts. The officers will be giving extra emphasis on this during the fall by concentrating on school zones during school crossing tunes with Durham Road as a high priority. The Police Chief has talked with a number of citizens in the Durham Road area and he has been apprised of the concerns which were brought up last June. The Chief has vowed to pursue these concerns and to assist in seeking solutions to safety problems. For longer-term solutions, the city Engineer referred to the transportation safety bond which provided funds for improvement of Durham Road next summer. This project was on schedule. A small piece of the road will be worked on this fall by a developer who shall need to construct some site improvements near 108th Avenue. The bond project would provide sidewalks and bicycle paths on both sides of the road as well as street lighting, site-distance improvements, and left turn lanes for vehicles at all intersections. f This discussion group suggested the City explore bus turn outs F for the school buses. For longer-range planning and in a regional scope, there has been talk of a westerl i y bypass and similar routes. These discussions were prompted because of concerns on Durham Road and similar east-west routes in the Tigard and Tualatin areas. Those plans also address the provision of alternate routes for through traffic. A few ideas were discussed by the group and were decided not appropriate for implementation. These ideas included: Crosswalks. While this seemed like a logical safety improvement, after review of literature which suggested crosswalks have not shown the safety benefits which COUNCIL MINITTW - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 7 might be expected. in some cases, safety was actually decreased. It was decided that crosswalks should not be installed until after the improvements have taken place. With the undulating alignment of the road, crosswalks would not be easily visible by motorists and might create a false sense of security by pedestrians. Warning signs. Most of the people who drive Durham Road were those that drive the road every day because they live or camute through the area. Men people drive streets every day, signs are not noticed after awhile; therefore, this would not be an effective way to inform drivers. Pedestrian tunnels. The group rejected this idea due to other safety concerns which go along with tunnels; i.e, potential for vandalism and, because this would not be a secured area, parents would not want their children to be walking through tunnels under the street. Bridges over the street. Similar concerns to the tunnels were noted plus the bridges would need to be rather high to clear the street and provide room for a bus or truck to go under. Experience has shown that bridges were not well utilized. People find them too hard to access and use. The group suggestion was not to put in the bridges now. After the safety bond improvements were completed, a review of the situation would be needed to determine if a bridge crossing would be appropriate. It was suggested that 98th Avenue would be the first intersection to be reviewed as logical site because this road comes from the school; designs were reviewed that may be attractive to pedestrians. City Engineer noted these ideas should have safety benefits for both the long-term and short-term solution to these problems. Mayor thanked City Engineer for his review. He noted he thought staff did an excellent job in addressing the concerns since the testimony received last June. 7. Pun= HEAmn - mo ammE AI ZCN zcA 89--06 mum; Npo 13 For a zone change from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard R-7 zoning designation. ZONE: Presently R-6 County (Residential, 6 units per ace, Washington County). LOCATION: South end of 135th Avenue (WCIM 2S1, 4, Tax Lot 700) a. Public Hearing was opened. b. There were no declarations or challenges. COUNCIL HU UItES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 8 C. Summation by Planning Staff member Jerry Offer. On July 17, 1989, the Council reviewed the annexation proposal for the Daniels property and approved annexation. On August 24, 1989, the Metropolitan Area Boundary Commission also approved that annexation; this parcel would be in the City when the Boundary Comm.ssion approval resolution was signed. When Council reviewed this proposal in July, the proposal was put forward to change the zoning from the County's R-6 designation to the City's R-7 zoning designation. The County's designation allowed six units per acre; the city's closest zoning designation to that was the R-7 which allows seven units per acre. At that time, members of the audience requested the City downzone the area to R-4, or four units per acre. The Council asked staff to review this possibility and whether the City would encounter any problems with the requirements for meeting housing opportunities under the Oregon Achninistrative Rules, Division 7, Metropolitan Housing Rule. Tigard staff discussed this proposal with Washington County's Planning staff who advised they felt the zoning would basically be up to the City. However, the County indicted that if a downzoning were approved, the housing opportunity decrease would occur in the City's inventory, not the County's. This was confirmed by Tigard Staff with the DLCD office. Staff has kept track of the housing opportunities through the various developable residential properties, and presently, Tigard has an opportunity for 13,112 units throughout the City (for an average 10.16/acre). State law requires Tigard to have the housing opportunity on developable lands as 10 units/acre. The City could approve a redesignation to a lower density plan and zone designation and subtract the 100 units from the inventory and still comply with the State law for total opportunity; however, the City would be that much closer to being right at the line of compliance. Staff recommends that this property not be rezoned to R-4.5, and that council approve the earlier proposed R-7 designation. Staff feels the City should try to retain as much housing opportunity as possible. Further, because of the topographic constraints of the proposed property, the net effect of a rezoning would not accomplish anything. Staff does not believe the property would develop at a density of greater that 4.5 units per acre no matter what the zoning was. Staff recommends that the Council add the Planned Development Overlay Zone to the designation. The effects of this would be: - to make the Planning Commission the hearing body on a subdivision application and - to provide flexibility in individual lot sizes and in setbacks to allow the staff, Planning Commission and the developer more COUNCIL KDRTITS - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 9 creative ways to develop the property. The Planned Development process could be utilized to require additional buffers along the northern boundary of this site or to possibly require larger lots along that b=x1ary and then allow the lots further away from the developed area to be smaller. In summary, staff recce mended that the Council change the zoning on this property from the County's R-6 zoning designation to the City's R-7 zoning designation, with the Planned Development Overlay. d. Public Testimony Prot~onents o Tour Brian, 7630 S.W. Fir Street, Tigard, Oregon, testified that he represented Taira Klaus Corporation which was the owner and applicant of the property. He noted, as had been outlined by staff, the Boundary Commission approved annexation of the property last week. One of the elements provided in evidence at the Boundary Commission, was a substantial change in the proposal from what was submitted to the City a month ago. The lots have been decreased from 152 to 120; it would all be natural gravity flow instead of pump stations; the number of lots contiguous to the Fern Street properties have been reduced from 13 to 10; drainage lines have been moved out of the easement between those lots and the Fern Street properties to eliminate any disruption to the natural vegetation and the trees there. The developer does not object to a dawnzone. The proposed density would be about 3.2 units/acre. Mr. Brian referred to a letter from Mr. Dale Addington submitted to Council which outlines this position on the downzoning. Mr,. Brian advised the developer supported the Planned Development Overlay. He said there were a lot of natural and sensitive areas on that property which needed to be preserved and the flexibility the PD overlay would provide would be important. In addition, he advised they would be meeting with the neighborhood to respond to their concerns. o Mayor read into the record the August 28, 1989, letter from Dale Addington, authorized representative of Taira Klaus Corporation which stated the developer did not object to a downzoning of the property. This letter has been filed with the Council packet material. COUNCIL Mn4UrES - ATJGUSr 28, 1989 - PAGE 10 t Opponents o Rod Kvistad, 13535 S.W. Fern Street, Tigard, Oregon, testified he was a proponent for the City of Tigard over the long haul. He said he did not like to see a project go in without all the details thoroughly analyzed. The downzoning would be excellent. He referred to Councilor Eadon's earlier comments that as housing lots become smaller, more parks would be needed. He advised of his concerns should this property be developed at full density. He encouraged the Council to look at the 4.5 units/acre designation for housing in the area. Even this would not be coapatible with what now exists; most G; of the lots in the area were at least 3/4 of an acre in size. He noted concerns with roads, drainage, sewage, etc. He asked; that the procedures be outlined to assure neighbors could f. provide meaningful input into the project prior to it being presented to the City.. Mayor advised of the process available through the Planned Development Overlay regulations. s 4 Mr. Kvistad urged the Council to not only look at this project, in terms of density, but to future projects which could occur in the area and what this might mean to the total picture of the City of Tigard being a pleasant place to live. { The decision made this evening would represent a precedent for ` a great deal of property; therefore, he again noted the importance to dawnsize the zoning designation. Councilor Johnson expressed concerned over a statement by Mr. Kvistad that they did not know about this public hearing. o V.W. Kaczynski, 12985 S.W. 135th, Tigard, Oregon, testified that this property was on the north slope of Bull Mountain; it was not on the top or agricultural land it was forest land. If this property was on the top of Bull Mountain, he advised he would have no objections to the density goals as state. He s said he professionally disagreed with the position stated to the Council by the City planner. He said the only analysis the planner was using was the analysis of housing goals and density. Mr. Kaczynski. said there were equally required L CDC goals of water--quality, wildlife, and natural resource protection as well as soil conservation. He noted when all of these were taken into consideration, a recoamnendation cannot be made for a density of 7 units per acre on this steep, highly erodible property. Mr. Kaczynksi noted concerns with winter conditions including icing which occurs several weeks every years. He advised that S.W. 135th Avenue was Washington County Road and represented a j. serious traffic safety problem. COUNCIL MINE= - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 11 1 Mr. Kaczynski advised the entire property has had every bit of soil scraped. He outlined the removal of trees, plant life (including some endangered plan species), and brush which was recently removed. He said he was prepared to sue the developer should the land slump onto his property which was immediately adjacent. In response to a question by Mr. Kaczynski, it was noted by the City Engineer and Mayor that the property was not within the City limits at the time the clearing was done. F a Mr. Kaczynski expressed concerti that if the property was zoned to seven units per acre, the developer could find creative t ways to increase the density. He noted there were serious. constraints on the property. He strongly urged Council to ' downzone the property. o Gary Steele, 12645 S.W. 135th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon, noted neighborhood concerns. He advised he moved to the area because of the large lots, dead end streets, and it was less crowded than nearby areas. He noted he would not be opposed to higher density housing on the top of the mountain; but not on the steep slopes. He asked Council to consider changing the zoning from R-4.5 instead of R-7; this would appease the neighbors in the area. Mr. Steele advised he called LCDC in Salem and talked to Mr. Greg Wolfe. Mr. Wolfe advised that even though this area was t; zoned R-7, I CDC will review the area as to the way the area has developed to determine whether the housing inventory requirements have been met. He noted he was pleased that the developer has decided to develop the land with fewer units. E He advised he has talked to the Water District and with full development of Bull Mountain's north slope, there would not be f enough water available. Other problems he cited included . drainage and traffic. He advised the Bull Mountain p: Transportation Study has not yet been completed and now, there was an additional 122 homes being built with only one way out t' on 135th Avenue. Mr. Steele said a lot of issues needed to be reviewed in making the decision as far as zoning was concerned. If the 4s zoning is set at R-4.5, development would be limited; however, if Council approves the R-7, the developer could change their mind and build to that density thereby creating additional problems. He noted adjacent area was zoned R-4.5 and would be more in keeping of the current land use of adjacent properties and the long-term, sensible land use of the north slope of COUNCIL KDRnES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 12 ~u Bull Mountain. Mr. Steele referred to the earlier comments on parks. He said the only parks they have in their area was in a residential area which was not accessible because there was no parking. Mr. Steele advised that telephone service was also an issue. He said he talked to the telephone company. Presently, the residents were on a carrier system which was very poor and causing problems. As far he knew, this was the only service which would be available for the 122 harms. He reiterated he recommended to the City Council the area be downzoned. o John Lewis, 13990 S.W. Fern, Tigard, Oregon, testified that he thought the developer was planning to develop at only the 3.2, units per acre. However, he was concerned should this developer sell the property to sarneone else who was not as f, credible. Mr. Lewis noted concerns about the ravine on the west side of the development with regard to drainage. He also was concerned with traffic issues. o Til]man Stone, 13720 S.W. Fern Street, Tigard, Oregon,.. C testified he represented the Fern Street Neighborhood Association. Mr. Stone outlined the characteristics of his neighborhood noting the neighbors cared very much about their' area. He said the zoning choices between R-7 and R-4.5 was a major concern. He noted the management of the whole project had been poor; the original engineers were no longer working i. on the property. Mr. Stone said he believed the overall project was a good one; if it was done correctly, it would probably enhance existing properties. However, there were serious safety concerns to considered and he would remain opposed to a development at R-7 zoning until further consideration was given. Mayor Edwards clarified, for the record, about the vegetation clearing ont he property. He said Washington County apparently was advised and knew of the developer's activity. Tigard has no authority over the property at this time. The Mayor noted that with a Planned Development overlay, concerns over this property can be voiced. Mayor assured those present he was fully aware of the neighborhood and was familiar with their concerns. He noted he, too, wished to preserve the ecology of the area as much as possible. COUNCIL KM= - :AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 13 o Kathy Baxter, 12950 S.W. 235th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon, noted concerns over the period which she called a "sneaky window." She noted frustration over the County advising neighbors that this was going into the City, yet when the City was contacted, they said the property was still in the county. She said within one day the environment was ruined. Ms. Baxter also noted concerns with removal of trees over six inches in diameter. Mayor reiterated the City has no legal jurisdiction over this property. Ms. Baxter suggested that since this probably could happen again, the City and County should determine a way to govern in these instances. Mayor outlined the regulations in place by several jurisdictions. He noted he was also concerned when the clearing of the property was taking place. Once the property becomes part of the City, then items such as traffic, drainage, sewage, and buffering can be addressed. Mayor noted the City's concern that people living in Bull Mountain have not expressed their desire to be annexed to the city in order to assure planning as development occurs. Ms. Baxter asked about liability for problems because of the clearing of the property's vegetation. City Attorney said he believed the City would not have any liability for action which was taken without the City's approval nor was the property within the city's jurisdiction. Ms. Baxter concluded by urging the Council to zone the property R-4.5. Rebuttal o Tom Brian clarified the following issues: - There were changes within the last ten days with regard to representatives of the developer. He was personally contacted by the developer within this time period which has resulted in some of the changes in the plan as submitted. Hopefully, the team together now would be consistent in their approach to the development of the property- - Tree removal occurred prior to Mr. Brian's supervision of the project. He said it had been his understanding this was done for removal of brush and was done with the permission of Washington County. The only trees cut down over six inches were photographed in advance, submitted to the County. They were either diseased or dead. COUNCIL MMUI'E•S - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 14 The contractor has been directed to examine the area and to look at soil stabilization in areas necessary. Mr. Kac ynsk; requested that as soon as property becomes part of the City, to direct the developer, through the City Engineer, to do anything possible to stabilize the soil. Mayor advised he thought this request was reasonable and the City Engineer would look at damage (if any) and assess the area. e. Recommendation by the Community Development Staff. City Engineer noted the subdivision process would be a separate public hearing process which would proceed after the property was in the City. He advised staff has viewed a subdivision proposal and a revised proposal, neither of which have been reviewed thoroughly at this time. Receipt of review ecments would occur during the Planning Commission hearing. City Engineer noted the issue before Council tonight was the zoning of the property. Basically there were three choices presented: 1. R-7 Zoning 2. R-7 Zoning with Planned Development Overlay 3. R-4.5 Zoning A draft ordinance was prepared and submitted to Council outlining the zoning for R-7 with the Planned Development Overlay. If Council chose one of the other two options, City Engineer suggested the Hearing be kept opened by continuing it to September 11 to assure proper procedural steps. City Engineer advised staff's reccmmendation was for R-7 Zoning with the Planned Development Overlay. After reviewing this site and some of the preliminary planning work, staff was persuaded that, even with an R-7 zoning, actual development of the site would be restricted by topography and it could not develop more than R- 4.5. This would preserve the housing inventory which was required under State regulations. He noted staff recmmended adoption of the proposed ordinance. f. Council Questions and Comments: Councilor Eadon asked Legal Counsel to review the LCDC housing requirement condition: At periodic review, how does the LCDC V evaluate compliance with housing density requirements? Legal Counsel responded that all jurisdictions in the metropolitan area were required to have within their plan, on paper, the opportunity to create a density of 10 units/acre with a split between single family and multi-family of 50/50. The requirement was one with which you could take a lot of different approaches. One approach would be to calculate the density down to the last unit and have ! only the minimum necessary. Another approach was to provide some COUNCIL M32R FB AUGUST 28, 1989 PAGE 15 margin of error. The staff was suggesting the latter approach based upon previous experience. Legal Counsel further explained, at periodic review, there was a review based upon both what had actually taken place in the way of development and the density available on paper. If there was a pattern of developing at a much lower density provided for in the Comprehensive Plan, it raises the spec,-ter that the Comprehensive Plan was not really an accurate predictor of development and, therefore, additional density would need to be assigned to other areas to meet the average. g. Public Hearing Closed r h. Council Discussion: P' Each Councilor noted they did not make a declaration at the outset of the hearing; however, clarified they personally knew Mr. Tarn Brian, the developer's representative. This would have no bearing on any decision they would make on the issue. Councilor Schwartz noted he understood the concerns by the residents in the area. Realistically, he said he could not see the potential of R-7 density being constructed in this terrain. He noted he felt comfortable with the Planned Development Overlay on the subject property in that there would be adequate review and hearings on any development on this parcel. He pointed out the importance of maintaining the required housing density; Tigard was presently barely within the guidelines. If the City varies too far frarn this, they could be in violation of the State requirements. In addition, by not knowing what other decisions would be needed for other pieces of property in the future, he advised he would want to see as much flexibility for the City as possible. He noted, therefore, he would support the R-7 with the Planned Development Overlay. Councilor Kasten said he was sympathetic to many of the concerns E; expressed by the citizens who live in the Fern Street area. He noted the topography of the land would essentially prohibit high- density housing. As a Council, they were also faced with the requirements mandated by the State; therefore, he advised he would support the recarmnendation for R-7 Zoning with a Planned Development Overlay. Councilor Johnson explained the requirement by the State to have a 10 unit per acre inventory as she felt this was critical for those who testified to understand this. She further explained that if one area is downgraded for zoning, then there was a possibility that another area would have to be upgraded. I Councilor Johnson said she believed the area was improperly zoned by the County from the outset. She also noted the difficulty the COUNCIL MINUIM - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 16 City was in, because if they correct the zoning to more accurately reflect how the property could be developed then the City's density inventory would be affected not the County's. She further noted decisions made tonight must be made carefully because there was no guarantee of who would develop the property. R-4.5, she stated, would be the proper zoning and this was what she would support. She noted staff was watching to assure that the Proper inventory was maintained; however, she believed R-4.5 was the correct zoning for the property. Councilor Eadon agreed with Councilor Johnson's co m mts with regard to the inappropriateness of the County's zoning. She noted this could not be looked at as an isolated piece of property; the entire north slope of Bull Mountain was probably improperly zoned. When the slope develops, all of these issues must be revisited. She also noted the Planned Development Overlay would allow the citizens to be involved in the development and site reviews; it would also allow more discretion in the ultimate outcome of the property. The best immediate hope for Bull Mountain would be to attract developers into the area who would be sensitive to the uniqueness of the slope. Councilor Eadon noted her concern if the property was downzoned, then it would not be realistic or responsible to be so close to the minimum required by the State for density averages. She ~y advised she was going to support the zone change to R-7 with a Planned Development Overlay. She also noted the need for council to have discussion in the near future as they must continue to deal with the density issue. Mayor Edwards noted his agreement with the Councilors' comments. He advised he was concerned about the position the City was in with regard to the density requirements. Based on the fact that the developer in this particular situation was already going to develop at less than R-4.5 and most of the land bordering this area was R- 4.5, he announced that he would be voting in favor of the R-4.5 zoning. Councilor Schwartz said he thought it was obvious, because of topographical constraints, that the property could not develop at R-7. He pointed out by making this R-7, this gives the city more flexibility for future decisions. i. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to adopt Ordinance No. 89-22. ORDINANCE NO. 89-22 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE ZCA 89-06 (DANIEL) AND DECLARDIG AN EFTBC= DATE. COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 17 ( Mayor Edwards noted the name of the applicant, Daniel, should be changed to Taira-Klaus Corporation. A roll call vote was taken with Mayor Edwards and Councilor Johnson voting "Nay." The ordinance received a majority vote; however, Council practice has been to hold a second reading at the next meeting for ordinances which do not receive a unanimous vote of Council present. The second reading of tree ordinance was scheduled for September 11, 1989. 8. NW-AGENDA rIEM a. Mayor announced that the Council would be supporting the MSTIP/2 Proposal of Washington County. This was being done based upon the partnership with the neighboring cities of Tualatin and Sherwood. He advised Council felt it was very important that the regional transportation be completed in the area. Councilor Schwartz added that the MSTIP/2 would also take care of major projects within the Tigard area which were badly needed. b. Mayor noted Council consensus to join the other jurisdictions in Washington County to oppose the proposed area of North Plains as a future prison site. Council would not oppose a prisons in Washington County; however, from testimony received council was aware of areas within the Stab= which have asked for the prison which also meet the criteria and would benefit economically. C. Councilor Johnson referred to an earlier con¢nent about a neighborhood park on the north side of 99W being tucked into a neighborhood which did not have parking and access. She noted funds would be provided for acess improvement and parking areas if the Park Levy was passed by the voters in September. Su mtierlake Park was a city-wide park. 9. EXBOUT E SESSION: The Tigard city council went into Executive Session at 9:53 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and cu=ent and pending litigation issues. 10. AA OURNME Rr: 10:40 p.m. Catherine Wheatley, City Reco iMayor, Ci o igard cw. c=828 COUNCIL NIIN[M - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 18 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice 7-6344 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 RECEIVED Legal Notice Advertising AUG 3 0 1989 • City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice CITY OF TIGARD P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 ' ❑ Duplicate Affidavit AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. 1, Dortha Marty being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tigard Times a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the afore ktid county and state* that the G~ity Council Meeting 8-28-89 a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and consecutive in the following issues: August 24, 1989 Subscribed and sworn o before me this25th of August, 1989 Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Aires: 6/9/93 AFFIDAVIT E~t. kyroanformattori. ja= The followmeli3ete' Further infmnationr ani~' frill ` eddas S ed fmfil t > 9 ~ of ! z tecorder,-13123.5 R.-`,9al1 vard; V. ng 6394171 CITY C~DUNC~JLt Uttie'UST 28, ig9 ° at 6 30`1'IvI STUDY i0 n7. 0 Al luIBE"T1I+iG f ";f ~ 1.31?~SsVil~ ~O ~ ~ s e•',~' 31 Disc+iss one vilx~~Comtnui:ii F Repiesentatzve x sYx h { $atlc 15 j J e~'7.. a ly_ 7{k JFys 'S'~.j~ s~~1. ~ i mot.. iy' c•' ~Durh~Tn R'` ~j(~~ro`~~'~_~~~~dAtL'' a'~N'~"~~" ~ ' ~ a 3r T]raut~VS~h~stles sn City Y}ii~l#ts~~lpc,~'~ -~`Y,~, E ~ ~ 'nx A *60, . Un't j NO 7 ®R TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684.0360 Notice 7_6338 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising 1000t7m • City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 1IG 18 • P. O. Box 23397 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit I/~ 89 Tigard, OR 97223 Ap AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )'s- 1. llnrtha arty being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tigard Times _ a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the Pahl i c TTP^ri ng a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and consecutive in the following issues: August 17, 1989 h ~ Clh~c.~ Subscribed and sworn t before me this 18th of August, 1989 Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Tres: 6/9/93 AFFIDAVIT PUBLIC HEARING The following :will. be consideiW_by, the Tigard City Council on August, 28, 1989, at',7:30 P.M. at Tigard Civic Center, Town.Hall Room `,13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, Further information maybe obtained,_ from the Community Development Director or-City Recordcrat'the same.., location` or by, calling 639-4171. You are invited to submit written tes timony advance of the publi c hearing;.' written and oral testimony will, be considered.At the hearing. The;public hearing will be conducted in aCri cordance'witli'the applicable Chapter 1$.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code and any rules of procedure-adopted by the Council and available at Ctty Hall. ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 89=06 DANIEL NPU #3 Fbr a+': zone change:from Washington County R-6 to City of TigaM R 7,xottmg . designabon ZONE Presently 12-6 County (Itesi ntial,; 6 units pper acre, s Washington Cotmty) LOCATION: Souttieiod, of 135th A~venue.(W~iTM;v 2S 14' C k of 7U0) e TT6338 Publish August 17,98 ,I "elk x~ ff :e AGENDA LTEM 2' VISITOR' $ .`AGENDA DATE "BIB " `(L"imited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED 'Please, 'i+ih. } e~d LW hy, '-'p E y~~ F- rZZc i~MAKI ro£~ 7 4~- -S Z A, 2_,-/2A - ' -25 2C A DATE AUGUST 28, 1989 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) PERSONS WILL BE ALLOWED 10 MINUTES FOR PRESENTATIONS. Item Description: :AGENQA ITEM NO. 7 ;:PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE: A nTION ZCA 89-06 DANIEL: NPO 13 Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name Addres liation Name, Address and Affiliation /e4 y ~l n i" a -1-5. cell acz ns~~ IZQ~S' S+N !3S ~ Gy z6~ ( S ~SSI D~ $ . • g~a8 / 8a METROPOLITAN AREA C" COMMUNICATIONS COMN41S SION 1815 N.W. 169th Place a Suite 6020 • Beaverton, OR 970064886 •629-8534 August 17, 1989 Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor City of Tigard i PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: 14ACC PRESENTATION TO THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL E Dear Mayor Edwards and Members of the City Council: t We have arranged with your City Recorder to make a brief appearance before your Council Study Session on August 28, 1989. This visit to Tigard will be the first in a series of presentations we hope to make annually to all fifteen MACC jurisdictions to update them regarding our current work activities. I will be accompanied by Paula Manley, Manager of Tualatin Valley Community Access (TVCA), the MACC operated community access television program. I will be providing an overview of MACC's various functions including cable franchise regulation, construction monitoring, consumer protection and our management of the Public Communications Network (PCN). Paula will highlight our newest effort with a short video presentation and other information about TVCA. We expect that our total presentation, including time for your questions, will take approximately 20 minutes. We have enclosed some additional information about our operations which you and the Council may find useful. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to share with you and the Council the work of MACC. We look forward to our visit on t August 28, 1989. Please contact me if you have any questions. Wa st Re ds, ce Cres Administrator Enclosures cc: Paula Manley METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 1815 NW 169th Place, Suite 6020 Beaverton, Oregon 97006-4886 (503) 629-8534 or (503) 220-0689 FAX: (503) 645-8561 The Metropolitan Area Communications Commission (MACC) is an intergovernmental cooperation commission formed under Oregon Statute 190.030 to 190.110. The statute allows local governments to bind together for a particular purpose and to create an organization for administrative purposes. The Metropolitan Area Communications Commission is such an organization. MACC HISTORY In early 1980, due to the pressures of cable television companies attempting to receive franchises in the Portland suburbs, a number of cities discussed joining together to collectively deal with cable television franchises. This allowed for better utilization of the governments resources and presented a more attractive cable market due to the increased number of potential cable subscribers. By 1984, fifteen member jurisdictions had joined MACC. Those fifteen jurisdictions were: Banks Hillsboro Sherwood Beaverton King City Tigard Cornelius Lake Oswego Tualatin Durham North Plains Washington County Forest Grove Rivergrove Wilsonville The Commission was structured similarly to a council/manager form of government. The "council' is the MACC Board consisting of a representative from each of the fifteen jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction has one vote regardless of its size. For example, unincor- porated Washington County with a population exceeding 75,000 and the City of Banks with a population of 500, each has only one vote. The jurisdictions appoint their own representative and an alternate. The Board sets policy, the Commission Administrator, hired by the Board as the "manager", sees that these policies are carried out. Only substantive Franchise Agreement changes require unanimous consent of the governing bodies of the member jurisdictions, such as considerations for transfer of ownership of the system. On February 10, 1982 MACC awarded a Franchise Agreement to Storer Metro Com- munications, Inc. In 1985, following the passage of the Federal Cable Communications Act of 1984, Storer and MACC renegotiated the Franchise Agreement. Several substan- tive changes were made at that time in the Agreement. Storer Metro continued to provide service to the franchise area until September 30, 1986. On October 1, 1986 Tidel Communications, Inc. purchased Storer Metro and operated the cable system until April page 1 f 29, 1988 as Willamette Cable TV. The system is currently owned by Columbia Cable of Oregon and now operates as Columbia Cable TV. In addition to the Columbia system, part of unincorporated Washington County (Cedar Mill, West Slope, Raleigh Hills, etc.) is served by TCI Cablevision of Oregon which operates under a consent decree, or court ordered franchise, with Washington County. Because MACC represents Washin&ton County in regulating cable service, MACC monitors TCI service provided to their Washington County subscribers. THE CABLE SYSTEM The cable operator is responsible for providing a "three cable" television system. One cable is the Residential Subscriber Network (RSN) which currently serves over 50,000 subscribers with over 89,000 homes passed. The RSN provides an addressable 61 channel system with interactive capability. Programming services include the six "over-the-air" channels originating from Portland, community access channels operated by MACC, satellite delivered programming, premium movie channels, and pay-per-view entertain- ment. The other two cable networks are institutional service networks. One of the institutional networks is reserved exclusively for public and nonprofit organizations and is referred to as the Public Communications Network (PCN). MACC has developed the PCN and is the managing/marketing agent and point of contact for public agencies who use the PCN for their communication needs. The PCN is one of the largest and most active of such networks in the country carrying data, telemetry, voice and closed circuit video services between dozens of public agencies, schools and libraries. The other institutional network is the Business Communications Network (BCN) for private enterprise use of the cable. The BCN is marketed by Columbia Cable TV, Inc. All three networks combined total almost 1800 miles of cable plant. FRANCHISE REGULATION AND CONSUMER PROTECTION MACC administers a unified cable system to facilitate regional telecommunications. Through the MACC Administrator and Consumer Relations Coordinator the Franchise Agreement is monitored and enforced. In 1985, Consumer Protection Standards were incorporated into the Franchise Agreement. These standards, monitored by MACC, require specific telephone answering, complaint resolution and system repair services. In addition, strict construction and installation standards are required to keep pace with the rapid residential development in our area. COMMUNITY ACCESS TELEVISION MACC has always taken a strong position in supporting the use of the cable system's community access channels. From 1983 to June 30, 1988, MACC actively operated the government access channel through video coverage of several City Council and the Washington County Commission meetings. As part of the 1988 transfer of ownership of Willamette Cable TV to Columbia Cable of Oregon, MACC agreed to assume the operation of Public, Educational and Government (PEG) access channels. Willamette (now Columbia Cable TV) agreed to provide sub- stantial financial support to MACC for this operation along with almost all of their access TV production equipment and rent free use of two television studios. On July 1, 1988 MACC assumed control over the access channels and created Tualatin Valley Community Access (TVCA). Through the newly hired access staff, TVCA provides access training and outreach programs representing an important communications medium in the area. 3 page 2 t. t: G- ( The current Access Channels are: CH 2-COMMUNITY BILLBOARD CH 27-COMMUNITY BILLBOARD CH &HEARING IMPAIRED CHANNEL CH 29-PCC EDUCATIONAL ACCESS CH 9-PUBLIC ACCESS CH 50-ACCESS CH. PROGRAM GUIDE CH 11-COMMUNITY ACCESS NETWORK (CAN) CH 55-EDUCATIONAL ACCESS I r; CH 21-GOVERNMENT ACCESS CH 59-PUBLIC ACCESS ' MACC FUNDING , As a free standing agency, MACC adopts its own budget, establishes its own policies and procedures, and currently handles all administrative affairs independent of any one jurisdiction. MACC is funded primarily by franchise fees along with Columbia Cable's annual support to access. Of the 5% franchise fee assessed, 2% is designated to cover MACC's administrative expenses, and provides additional support to the access program. Three per cent is returned to the member jurisdictions based upon total cable revenues generated within the boundaries of the jurisdictions. MACC's budget for 1988/1989 is composed of three funds: General Operating Fund, Access Division Fund, and Public Communications Network Fund. In Fiscal Year 1988/89 MACC anticipates total revenues of $1,510,438 and total expenditures of $1,052,950 with $457,488 being the share of the franchise fee returned to the member jurisdictions. Current MACC staff is authorized at sixteen full time employees, nine of which are involved with Tualatin Valley Community Access. MACC TODAY t As a successful, active organization, MACC regulates and enforces a residential cable f communications system for consumer protection, operates Community Access Television and manages the Public Communications Network providing a superior level of Cable TV services to the public. page 3 2 min. Sub3 • Siting Hjdjp Station Proper ies ~acent Lands : Dear Councilmembers and Staff: The Fire Marshall's office provided two letters one from the Hudson Station asking information on temporary closure in 1978 and the other a response from the Fire Marshall on methods of temporary closure procedure. No permit was issued by the Fire Marshall's office for removal of underground tanks since 1978? Contamination of this entire development site is a concern for the neighborhood and wish certification by a licensed firm recorded for the record as to the full removal of the underground tanks. The Fire Marshall's office inspects the site before full station closure to insure proper removal. There is no record of such removal in the Fire Marshall's file? Soil Av,ples taken were selected to the far end of the proposed Hudson development for proposed structural Hudson development and not where the existing station structures remain? This unbuilt, unused back lot acreage has been a grazing area for horses and years ago a farm homesite on the downside of the former Hudson station site facing Hwy. 99W. There is a need for DEQ verification to confirm soil and water samples throughout the entire Hudson development properties before a permit is issued and construction takes place by DEQ certification and recorded accordingly. The Plan calls CC for 'retention pond' and we question the rain runoff deposits considering muffled shaving: contain lead metals as well as acids from battery storage. USA also has stricter standards on non-permit[of these deposits. An open retention pond in a neighborhood of small children for safety reasons is unthinkable, unwanted when there are many safe systems that are installed above and below ground in tanks and will serve the public well. We are a neighborhood with open ditches not drains, septic tanks not sewers, so our healtl is at risk if the above concerns are not met by responsible elected officials and professional staff. The storm drainage closed pipes located on. S.W. Bacific Hwy. 99 should be utilized fully for this development Plan. Thank you, ?eo 1-4 3, TIGARD CITY COUNCIL HEMM MH EES - MEW 17, 2989 1. PdXY CALL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Valerie Johnson, Joe Kasten, and John Schwartz. Staff Present: Pat Reilly, City Administrator; Ken Elliott, Legal Counsel; Liz Newton, Senior Planner; Cliff Scott, Operations Manager (for Park Levy Discussion only); Catherine Meat-ley, Deputy Recorder; and Randy-Wooley, City Engineer. 2. STUDY SESSION: a. Propo~ect Park Levy - Council reviewed material from staff entitled "Preliminary Schedule for Park Levy Imple~ientation" which outlined l project phasing over five years. City Administrator noted implementation would be "pay as you go." He advised the estimated additional maintenance required per year was outlined. By the fifth year, approximately 3.5 additional employees (primarily seasonal workers) may be needed. Presently, the Parks Division has a total of five full-time-equivalent employees. It was noted Systems Development Charges (SDCs) collected for parks cannot be used for maintenance purposes. In response to a question by Councilor Johnson, discussion followed on the Budget Committee review of the proposed parks levy. It was consensus of Budget Ccat=ttee that Council would review the potential impact of maintenance costs before reccmiending a ballot title for the parks levy. There was discussion on the methodology ..used to estimate the increased maintenance hours for the implementation of the park levy. City Administrator noted the hours were calculated by using national standards; there was the possibility the figures could be either less or more than the estimate. It was noted the Parks Division was responsible for 13 parks as well as the Senior Center and Civic Center. Landscaping maintenance for the Civic Center was labor intensive. Senior Planner Newton briefly described the ballot title being prepared for Council consideration on July 24. The Senior Center im~mavements would not be included on the ballot title which was discussed as a possibility at a prior meeting. b. MSTIP 2 - City Administrator distributed two letters: (1) Letter dated July 14, 1989, from Bruce Warner of Washington County to Pat Reilly; and (2) Letter dated June 15, 1989, from Donald Adams, Oregon Department of Transportation to Bruce Warner of Washington County. City Administrator advised Mr. Warner had written in response to Tigard's concerns about the ccupletion of Scholls Ferry Road as a part of M rIP/1. Discussed was the possibility of transferring a portion of funds allocated to Farmington Read City Council Minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 1 There was discussion on the composition of members of TVFDC's Board of Directors. Ms. Tobias noted those seats which were reserved for representation of certain organizations within the cmmmnity. e. City Administrator presented a request by the Oregon Steel Headers Association for a waiver of the OLCC processing fee for a one-day liquor license. This event would occur on July 21, as part of the Cruisin' Tigard festivities. Consensus of City Council was to waive the fee. 3. VISTIMIS AGENDA: o D.K. Paul, 14137 SW Fanno Creek Court, Tigard, OR 97223, testified as President of the Colony Creek Homeowners' Association. Mr. Paul referred to an area on the east side of Hall Boulevard located south of and adjacent to Colony Creek Estates. He advised homeowners in the area were concerned with the R-12 zoning of the property. Senior Planner Newton advised this property had been designated R-12 since 1983. After Council discussion, Senior Planner Newton advised the residents' ISO could review and make a recommendation to City Council to initiate a Comprehensive Plan Amendment if. they so agreed. A Comprehensive Plan Amerdment must go through a public hearing process. Councilor Schwartz suggested that Mr. Paul also contact the property owner to determine whether he/she was willing to downzone the property to R-7 as was being suggested. Mayor Bt aids requested Mr. Paul leave the petition containing signatures of those people in favor of a downzone with staff. Staff was directed to assist Mr. Paul in working through the steps for this issue. 4. PUB[SC EMEM - Z= CEMNGE MMATUN ZC& 89-06, . DMUM ISO 13. To consider approval of annexation of 40 acres of unincorporated Washington County land to the city of Tigard. Also to authorize the zone change froti Washington County R-6 (6 units/acre) to City of Tigard R-7 (7 units/acre). 7JxAT OK: South end of southwest 135th Avenue (WCIM 2S1 4, Tax Lot 700). a. Public hearing was opened. b. There were no declarations or challenges. City council minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 3 He noted when the developer was presenting the proposal to the Water District, the total projection was for over 500 homes. Mr. Kvistad suggested the zoning designation be scaled down from R-7 to R-4.5 which would be more compatible with the surro6rr3ing area. Mr. Kvistad agreed with the following issues contained in the staff report: Special attention needed to be paid to drainage and sewer issues. He further advised the present condition of 135th • Avenue and Fern Street should be maintained before and after construction. o Gary Steele, 12645 SW 135th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon advised the area's Neighborhood Association met the week before. He said they were opposed to R-7 zoning and noted most homes in the area were on one-half acre (or larger) parcels. He advised increased density would adversely affect the value of their homes and rimed the zoning be reduced to R-4.5. He also requested the homes in the development be restricted so mi.nimam. square footage would be at least 1,800 square feet. Mr. Steele advised a street local improvement district for S.W. 135th Avenue had been formed and.funded by the neighbors: he requested any damage to the street, because of construction, be.repaired by the developer. Mr. Steele referred to safety issues for school children walking along '135th to catch the school bus. He said he hoped the road would be developed wide enough to allow for pedestrian walkways and suggested some yes to slow traffic. He noted problems with drainage in the area due to construction and tree removal. He would like to see a development rule wherein 50 percent of the trees six inches in diameter or more could not be removed. He was concerned about sewage and wanted to be assured that the line would be developed large enough to handle the increased demand. o Larry Westerman, 13665 SW Fern, Tigard, Oregon acknowledged that problems with development was outside the scope of this public hearing. However, he thought the issues should be hrazght forth for future consideration. Mayor agreed with Mr. Westerman's comments and thanked him for noting the purpose of the public hearing. o Larry T. St. Pierre, 13992 SW Fern Street, Tigard, Oregon, noted concerns with sewer pumping capability and advised the existing pumps Were already tannin 24 hours a day. City Don.tncil Minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 5 - At the developer's presentation to the Water District, they displayed drawings which illustrated potential build-out of the area. He outlined the sewage facilities and noted where easements must be obtained for hookups and pumping stations. With regard to the zoning issue, Tigard Is R-7 was the only comparable zone to Washington County's R-6. He further advised that Geotechnical reports on soils have indicated development was feasible.. This area would be in the City of Tigard School District. Road construction specifications would be coupleted within stricter guidelines than was required by the City of Tigard. Right-of-way requirements would be complied with although the developer would prefer a narrower street which would tend to reduce traffic speed. In response to a question from Councilor Johnson, City Engineer advised that the 135th Avenue would be required to be developed to interim City standards. Mr. Sessions advised that they intended to satisfy any requirements the City stipulates. e. Reccumendation by City Engineer: City Engineer noted the subdivision development was not under consideration at this public hearing. Staff had been informally we king with the developer on a development proposal. He advised that development concerns should be br x t to the attention of residents' NPO and CPO representatives. He noted City policy has been to encourage annexation if a property owner requests annexation. This request was in ecaupliance with the wive Plan. He advised that the zone change was not really a change, but was required through an intergovernmental agreement with the County. This intergovermTental agreement stated that the City of Tigard would adopt zoning which was most similar to the County's zoning. In response to a question by Councilor Johnson, the City Engineer advised that the NE Bull Mountain study was scheduled to be ca mpleted later this summer. The study should be available before developw-nt of the property. f. Public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 7 The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of Council present. It was noted the zone change would require a separate public hearing at a later date. Mr. 5essums asked he be notified if the property should be downzoned. (Council meeting recessed at 9:07 p.m.) 5. STAY SESSICK TCMCS 0ONT3NUED - VA= LZW-XTY STAIR iD6: City Engineer advised Council of the progress concerning phosphate standards for the Tualatin River which were to be in place by 1993 with a draft plan adopted by 1990. After a hearing before the Hearings officer and negotiation with DEQ staff, it appears that the DM staff will support less restrictive standards until March of next year. An Environmental Quality Ccamni.ssion hearing was scheduled for Friday, July 21 in Corvallis. 6. E VE SESSION: Zhe Tigard City council went into Executive Session at 9:20 p.m., under the provisions of CRS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), and (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 7. AWOORNMEW: 9:34 P.PL ; Approved by the Tigard City Council on August 28, 1989. Deputy Recorder - City of Tigaf-A i AT=: Mayor - City of Tigard i cw/Council2 M: \OFFSVCS\ r B City Council M9nuttes - July 17, 1989 - Page 9 T I G A R D CITY C O U N C I L pEfflM HDOXES - JULY 24, 1989 1. ROM CALL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors Carolyn Eadon, Valerie Johnson, Joe Kasten (arrived at 6:26 p.m.); and John Schwartz. Staff Present: Pat Reilly, City Administrator, Wayne Lowry, Finance Director; Ed Murphy, Comn unity Development Director; Liz Newton, Senior Planner; Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder, and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. 2. STUDY SESSIC K: a. City Center Development (CCD) - Land Use Policy Statement. Senior Planner Newton distributed the Land Use Policy Statement for council review. Council made several amendment suggestions; the revised Land Use Policy Statement, which was accepted by Council consensus, is attached. Senior Planner Newton then reviewed the CCD Plan activities scheduled through 1990. There was discussion on parameters within which the budget for the CCD would be prepared. Finance Director noted the CCD Agency ]must operate under State statutes for local government budgets: A Budget Ciou nittee would be appointed consisting of five outside members in addition to the five members of the OC D Agency. (OCD Agency consists of the Mayor and Cecil members.) City Administrator advised development of press releases for the proposed OM was the next step. b. Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Discussion - Chris Bowles of USA was present to answer Council questions on the USA Contract amendment proposed in Consent Agenda Item .2., Council had previously questioned the industrial waste language. Mr. Bowles advised Tigard presently bad nine industrial waste accounts. The proposed contract charades represented actual practice wherein USA was monitoring these industrial accounts; however, they were not reoeiving the revenue for doing so. FirkAnoe Director, in his memorandum of June 19, 1989, noted the net result of the proposed changes would be a $2,900 reduction in sewer revenue. The City would not be required to bill the nine industrial accounts each month. Mayor thanked Mr. Bowles for atte-ding the meeting. C. Park Levy Review. City Administrator reviewed financing issues with regard to the Park Levy. He reported the consultant had not anticipated inflationary costs in project estimates. After review, CITY COM4CM MINUM - JULY 24, 1989 - PAGE 1 i interim regulations focus on construction its which should help to limit erosion and sedimentation. The interim regulations f would be effective July 1, 1990. City Engineer advised additional standards were proposed by Jack Churchill of Lake Oswego; however, his proposal must go through several phases of hearings. t 2. JUM To THE CE3'Y - SERVICE AWARQS yo CITY OF 71GAM EKPIDYEES a. The City of Tigard recognizes its employees annually with awards for length of service to the City. The Mayor noted the following: b Receiving gold key plaques and small gold keys with diamond chips for 20 years of service were Lt. Lonnie Sranstetter and Jahn Hagman. f Receiving gold key plaques for 10 years of service were Al Dickman, Darwin Deveney, and Bobby White. Receiving Keys to the city for 5 years *of service were Detective John Nerski and Keith Laden. _ The Mayor thanked the employees for their dedicated service. 3. CONSENT AG ND?U f 3.1 Approve council Minutes: June 12, 1989 3.2 Approve Amendment to Unified Sewerage Agency Contract - Resolution No. 89-58 3.3 Approve Investment Policy - Resolution No. 89-59 ' 3.4 Approve Board and ccumittee. Appointments - Resolution No. 89-60 S Motaon by Cm -r-Alor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. The notion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. (Council recessed at 7:40 p.m.) 4. UX2L IM IE W BOAM a. Roll call: President Jerry Edwards; Board Members: Carolyn Eadon, i Valerie Johnson, Joe Kasten, and John Schwartz. b. The City Engineer advised bids were opened on July 18, 1989, for the locust Street bond project. The project involves half-street widening from 93rd Avenue to Hall Boulevard aril realignment of the existing sharp eves east of the elementary school. Four bids were received. City Engineer recammended bid award to the low bidder, white Cansttuction Company, in the amount of $375,573. CITY COUNCIL MnWTES - JULY 24, 1989 - PAGE 3 6. (MV IM I1WP%=0N ORDINANCE AMENEMENP a. City Attorney reviewed this agenda item. He noted a major overhaul of the civil infraction's enforcement procedure had been implemented in 1986. The purpose of the proposed ordinance was to further clarify and enhance those areas in which the.1986 revisions fell short. Specific issues, as noted in the staff Report, were as follows: 1. The need for substitute service of the citation. 2. Further clarification of the components in written orders and the time frame in which those should be filed. 3. Clarification of abatement requirements. 4. Penalties adopted for failure to cmply with a judgment order. City Attorney advised this ordinance would further streamline and make the process more workable. His recommendation was to pass the proposed ordinance. b. ORDINANCE NO. 89-21 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CEAPTER 1.16, C= INFRACTIONS, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE RMTHER DEFINING THE HEARING PROCESS AND ABATEMENT RDQUIRIIMENPS, AND FIXING AN EF ECfIVE DATE. C. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Jolu=n, to adopt Ordinance No. 89-21. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of council present. 7. RCK-AGENDA ITEMS: None 8. EX XY= SESSION: The Tigard City -council went into Executive session at 7:50 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 9. _ 8:30 p.m. Approved at the City Council Meeting of August 28, 1989. Depulty Recorder - City of igard Attest: Mayor - City of Tigard C cw/c=in724 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 24, 1989 - PAGE 5 o>L. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 28, 1 VOREQUESTED ATE SUBMITTED: August 17, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Consider REVIOUS ACTION: Special Cities lution Supporting Expeditious Meeting - August 10, 1989 to Commence Western Bypass REPARED BY: DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIBY: City Administrator POL CY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attadhed is a resolution prepared for Council consideration which strongly urges ODOT, DLCD, and other participating jurisdictions to move forward with. the land use analysis for the Western Bypass Corridor and to commence , preliminary engineering and right-of-way acquisition. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached resolution. 2. Adopt resolution with recommended amendments. 3. Decline action at this time FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION 1. Adopt the attached resolution. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 18, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: August 18, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ResolutiWPOLI PREVIOUS ACTION: None porting City of Gaston's Membthe Metropolitan Area Comm. CPREPARED BY: Marcha K. Hunt DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN REQUESTED BY: Patrick J. Reilly ISSUE Should the City of Tigard support the request of the City of Gaston to join ! the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission? INFORMATION SUMMARY On July 6, 1989, the City of Gaston formally requested membership in MACC. This follows a request to the City by Columbia Cable of Oregon to provide cable service to the City and surrounding area. The last jurisdictions to join MACC were in 1984 (Durham, North Plains, and Wilsonville). Gaston is the only incorporated city in Washington County not a member of MACC. The Board of MACC, by consensus, is recommending that the member jurisdictions consider the request of the City of Gaston to join the Commission. All 15 f member jurisdictions need to pass this resolution for it to become effective. If all 15 jurisdictions consent to Gaston's membership and Gaston approves the current MACC Franchise and Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement, a resolution will be considered by the MACC Board at their September 1989 meeting to formally admit Gaston as the 16th MACC jurisdiction and grant a franchise to Columbia. Upon successful completion of this process, Gaston cable construction would be complete within 30 days of grant of Franchise. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve and executive as written attached resolution. 2. Postpone action and request further information. 3. Deny request. j i FISCAL IMPACT. None known for the City of Tigard. r SUGGESTED ACTION Approve and execute as written attached Resolution. mh0288D I CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: Aiagmt 28,.IL989 DATE SUBMITTED: 8/3/89 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution PREVIOUS ACTION: none Welcomin Head Start to the Cit AC- -.zqLdfi- PREPARED BY: Duane Roberts. Admin. Plan. DEPT HEAD O ITY ADMIN O REQUESTED BY: Ed Murphy. Com. Dev. Dir. OLICY ISSUE To adopt a resolution welcoming the establishment of a Head Start center in Tigard. INFORMATION SUMMARY Washington County Head Start will be opening a Tigard center at City University in September of this year. The center is moving from a site in Sherwood in order to better serve the residents of the Tigard area. Head Start is a comprehensive preschool program for low income children and their families. Locally, the program is sponsored by the Washington County Community Action Organization. The Tigard Christian Church is fairly positive about the center using space in their building from next year after construction of their new wing is completed. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL IMPACT Passage of the resolution in itself will have no fiscal impact. In conjunction with opening day ceremonies at the new Tigard Head Start Center, it is recommended that the City purchase and present a small gift to the program. When the Portland Japanese School moved to Tigard in 1987, the City gave the school five soccer balls as a goodwill gesture. If so desired, staff could contact the Head Start program administrator for gift suggestions. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the resolution welcoming the Head Start center to Tigard. br/Headst.dr 3.5 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: _August 28, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: August 10, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Appropriation PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A of Donations PREPARED BY: Wayne Lawry DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK RDQUESTED BY: Police Department PO CY ISSUE Local budget law allows the City Council to appropriate by resolution, gifts, or donations transferred to a municipal corporation for a specific purpose. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Tigard Police Department has received several donations from private individuals for use in the Police Department. Amounts received were as follows: Canine Unit 50 Canine Unit 100 General Use 200 Total 350 In order to appropriate this unanticipated revenue, the City council must pass a resolution as attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Pass proposed resolution to appropriate funds. 2. Do not appropriate funds. FISCAL IMPACT 1. Increases appropriation in Police materials and services by $350. SUGGESTED ACTION 1. Staff reccnmiends approval of resolution. cp/Itemsum H:\MRD\ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 28, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approval of PREVIOUS ACTION: Pro ect for Streets CIP Bud et PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole DEPT HEAD O ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: xzx==xxz===x=z xc===eggs==xa axmxcaa:=xxaz~sazz=x=xaz=xccaazxx=xzxx=sac= POLICY ISSUE Identification of a specific project for inclusion in the 1989-90 streets CIP budget. INFORMATION SUMMARY The 1989-90 capital improvement budget for streets shows $105,051 for "new project to be identified". On August 10th the Transportation Advisory Committee discussed project priorities and recommended that the $105,051 be used for installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Greenburg and Cascade Boulevard. If Council concurs with the Committee's recommendation, the design process will proceed immediately with construction tentatively scheduled for early 1990. Prior to actual construction the usual Council approvals will be required through the Local Contract Review Board process. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the project as recommended by the Transportation Advisory committee. 2. Direct that the funds be used for an alternative project. 3. Postpone identification of the specific project. FISCAL IMPACT Project funds are already allocated in the 1989-90 adopted budget. SUGGESTED ACTION That the Council, by motion, approve the Greenburg/Cascade traffic signal project for inclusion in the Streets Capital Improvement budget at a funding level of $105,051. dj/SS-CIP.RW 3 . '7 I CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: Au st 28, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: August 16, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Acquisition f PREVIOUS ACTION: Acquisition Patchin Property for S.W. Mcn- Negotiations Street Bond Pro'ect PREPARED BY: Dev. Services Mana er DEPT HEAD O CITY ADMIN OF, REQUESTED BY: Community Development P ICY ISSUE Should the City Council authorize the City Administrator to purchase the house at McDonald and Hall? INFORMATION SUMMARY The City has been negotiating with Don and Pat Patchin to acquire their property which is located at the corner of S.W. Hall Blvd. and S.W. McDonald Street. The purpose of the acquisition is to facilitate the S.W. McDonald Street Bond improvement project. Attached is the sales agreement, prepared by the City Attorney, and a map showing the subject property. The sale price was authorized by the City Council in an executive session on July 10. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the acquisition of the Patchin property for $63,000, plus closing costs, to facilitate the S.W. McDonald Street Bond project. FISCAL IMPACT $63,000 plus closing costs, which will be charged to the McDonald Street Bond project. We plan to rent the house for approximately $500 per month. Once the McDonald project is completed, the house will be sold. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that Council authorize the City Administrator to approve all necessary documents to acquire the above described property. br/Patchn.rsc FROM CHICAGO TITLE.TIGARD 9.16.1989 14:56 P. 3 E, ,Yuly 14,1989 RECEIVED JUL 1 1989 C'TY®F TIOAKW Don and Pat Patchin ComnpC,lb 8640 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or 97223 Subject: SW McDonald Street,Bond Project 281 11AA TL 100 Over the past few months we have discussed the SW McDonald Street Bond project and the City's need to acquire certain rights-of-way to complete the project. Typically we acquire a narrow strip along the frontage of properties , and maybe an easement, to provide for new street and utility improvements. This is no different with your property , however we are anticipating that additional improvements along your frontage will create a significant impaot to the who4v property. You have expressed a desire for the City to acquire the whole property as you were intending to sell soon anyway. This would meet your needs and give the City control over the property while the Street improvements were being completed. After consideration, the city agrees with the concept and is prepared to acquire your property. This letter is intended as an offer to purchase the above-referenced property in conformance with the requirements of ORS 35.346. The City offers the total gum of Sixty-Three Thousand Dollars ($63,000) for the entire property, payable in cash at closing. The City's offer is for fee title, free of all encumbrances, and, therefore, deeds or releases will be required from all parties having an interest in your property. All taxes, liens and other assessments on the property will be prorated to the date of closing, and any portion3 thereof accrued prior to closing shall be paid out of the proceeds. With respect to closing cost, the will require that you pay for a title insurance policy with an insured value equal to the purchase price. The city will also require that. you pay the Washington County transfer tax, recording lees and government service charge. The City will share 50/80 the customary escrow fees. This offer is made on behalf of the city of Tigard in conformance with the requirements of ORB 35.346. Please indicate your acceptance of the offer by signing and dating below and delivering the original of this letter to the City of Tigard on or before August 8,1989. Sinc ely you s, Any S. fan ( Development Services Manager R8C/rso/patchin.1tr c. Ken Elliott FROM CHICAGO TITLE.TIGARD 8.16.1989 14:57 P 4 Patahin Letter Page 2 i July 14, 1989 I AGREE TO ACCEPT the City of Tigard • e purchase offer in aCCordance with the above-stated terms. DATED this A6 day of , 1989. Signatures h f r E i E " r4 I r 21, N 00 J - O ~hIONJ S1 12 ..1f10S • W ~ J J W u p 2 O C\i I iv a= • s s ' \ HWr a0,/225 1 • 1 s j 1 StaTEC - l HMK +09/255 ago 'I tH0 w10t" T . r 7~` E 2 n ' No A S 11~~ s 120 9'' o I 41 a ,.i...:... r. A~ CHINS r 4g n T NW It N a ~ U W v~ V `vl d O ~ ~ z N QQ Q C\J ^ - 4 g w LLI u w (n C~ Lgi. 1/1111)S OSI H:! N N h Ih • ~ N ~ L S m O ; ;0 1W iQanoo 4i6A p.A6►'S OLI N1MON u U _ z ~Y m W 6Ci'l14 3 C' 4 OLI M zL b bb601 M .2 S Olt, (W~ 1 SNID147 Doll 3 ,z2 00 N N g _ F~ a u o c -j sNIVHO ao I zz co s w ~i tic .a S 962061 ore g C1W OF TIGARD, ORDGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITER S[~MARY AGENDA OF: August 28, 1989 nATE SUITED: Auca st 22, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TIME: Authorize Ma r OUS ACTION: Council Workshop Si ture on AgrgMgLx& to It 1 1 21, 1989 Yard Debris 1' with Wash. PREPARED BY: Cliff Scott DEBT HEAD OK CITY ALAS CKC REQUESTED BY: City Council POLICY ISSUE Should the City agree to participate in the Washington County Wasteshed Yard Debris Recycling Program as a way to meet ORS 459.161 which requires that residents in this area be provided the opportunity to recycle yard debris? INFOrOUMON SUMMARY Attached is a proposed resolution which authorizes the Mayor to sign an "Agreement to Implement Yard Debris Recycling." The Yard Debris Recycling Plan was reviewed by the City Council at their study Session on August 21, 1989. (A ecuplete copy of the Plan is available at the office of Ed Murphy, Director of Community Development.) ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached resolution as presented. 2. Modify the attached resolution. 3. Reject the agreement. FISCAL IMPACT Unknown at this time. The recycling program will be financed through fees charged to the users of the program, or generally to all garbage collection rate payers. The City will need to negotiate rates with its franchised haulers. SUGGESTED 1. Approve the attached resolution. c is MEMORANDUM E CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council August 21, 1989 FROM: Cathy Wheatley, Deputy RecordeeC j s SUBJECT: Council Packet for August 28, 1989 Council Meeting i i i Please be advised Agenda Item Nos. 4, 5, and 6 are updates from staff. (Agenda Item No. 5 is an update from the Park Board.) No Council packet material is anticipated. i f cW i i k i I E a • v CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 8/28/89 DATE SUBMITTED: 8/17/89 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Daniel PREVIOUS ACTION: Council approval ZCA 89-06 of annexation request PREPARED BY: Keith Liden DEPT HEAD rITY ADMIN REQUESTED BY: OLICY ISSUE Should the City approve a reduction in the allowed density in Washington County from 6 units to 4.5 units per acre or designate the property R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre) as provided in the Urban Planning Area Agreement with Washington County? INFORMATION SUMMARY On July 17, 1988, the Council approved the request for annexation of the subject 40 acre parcel and forwarded Resolution No. 89-57 to the Boundary Commission for its consideration on August 24, 1989. The Council elected to delay the adoption of an ordinance to rezone the property from Wash. Co. R-6 to Tigard R-7 due to concerns raised regarding the allowable density. The staff has discussed the possibility of reducing the permitted density with County staff and our LCDC Field Representative, Jim Sitzman. The staff recommends the adoption the R-7 zone with the addition of the (PD) Planned Development overlay and a Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. The rationale for this recommendation is articulated in the attached memo. Also attached is a proposed ordinance to change the zoning to R-7(PD). ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached ordinance 2. Modify and approve the attached ordinance FISCAL IMPACT The difference in density between the R-4.5 and R-7 zones would be 100 units. This would affect the City's overall assessed value as well as other costs and revenues to the City. However, based upon the preliminary proposals which have boen formulated by the property owner, it appears likely that the actual developed density will be in keeping with the R-4.5 zone. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the ordinance Public 7 August 28, 1989 The Hon. Gerald Edwards, Mayor Tigard City Council 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Zone Change Annexation ZCA 89-06 (Formerly Daniel, now Taira-Klaus Corporation) Dear Mayor Edwards and Council members: We wish to advise you that we do not object to a zoning designation of R-4.5 on the 40 acres which are subject to this application. If the council decides not to down-zone the property to R-4.5 for the reasons presented by your planning staff, please be advised that we will be developing the property substantially below R-4.5 anyway. Our most recent lot configuration, submitted to the city and the Boundary Commission, indicates a density of approximately 3.2 units per acre, although we reserve the right, upon detailed engineering, to develop in the 3.2 to 3.4 units per acre range. Further, we do not object to this property receiving a Planned Development (PD) overlay. It is our wish to preserve and protect the natural and sensitive features of this property and the flexibility allowed through the PD process best serves the property and allows maximum public comment. We are well aware that the planning process lies ahead of us and that density, drainage and transportation issues are of genuine concern to neighboring property owners. On behalf of Taira-Klaus Corp., we look forward to working with the neighborhood and city staff to achieve an attractive addition to the Tigard community. TAIRA-KLAUS CORPORATION D LE ADDINGTO Authorized Representative wv (P D) SELEf- CHC ` Ilo+wrR r r.~ cn as^ ol. 3 33 5 4 FRE Q 33 4 r sl1TNp1R1 3 O \ i Rl S IIOON~ vi ~ S.w. C1 lw.O.LS _ Et TENSION \ IYE Sr, w t NYIT C R /2 CIN4Mi•TS~y 1 F s w w~uwr sr. R-25 . "W cr. s . ~ Sal OY z w . V luejacr R- 45 - SH•INIGT IS-LA D •r f LIMITS R-4.5 L .j (PD) i ' S 4 8 9I s 3 ! HIN T N I NT • ` so r : T. r. ~rk j 1 s.. rr 'cT i MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Murphy, Community Development D pt. Director FROM: Keith S. Liden, Senior Planner RE: ZCA 89-06 Daniel/Metro Housing Rule DATE: August 17, 1989 The Metropolitan Housing Rule (OAR 660, Division 7) requires that the average density allowed for all undeveloped residential land within the City's original or "active" planning area be a minimum of ten dwelling units per acre. The City's Plan, as acknowledged by LCDC in 1984, inventoried 1,311 acres of developable residential land in the City. Zoning at that time provided for a housing opportunity of 13,110 units or 10.0 units per acre average. Since that time, eight Plan amendments have been approved which have affected the inventory. These redesignations provide a current inventory of 1,290 acres and a housing opportunity for 13,112 units or an average of 10.16 units per acre. The 40 acre Daniel property is within the City's "area of interest" as defined in the Urban Planning Area Agreement between Tigard and Washington County and it is outside of the active planning area. Washington County is obligated under the housing rule to meet an average of eight units per acre within the urban growth boundary which includes Tigard's area of interest. A map illustrating the boundaries of the active planning area and area of interest is attached. { When annexing land within the area of interest, the housing rule is considered to be satisfied if the City adopts the zone which most closely resembles the County designation. If the City elects to reduce the allowable density, calculating the affect upon housing opportunity would involve a comparison between the County density average of eight and the proposed maximum density for the property involved (4.5 units/acre in this case). Any reduction in the permitted number of units for an annexed property must be averaged with the total housing opportunity figure for Tigard. Applying the R-4.5 zone to the subject property would result in a housing opportunity loss of 100 units. Since the City presently has a surplus housing opportunity of 212 units, this property could be rezoned to R-4.5 and the City would remain in compliance with the housing rule. However, the City would then exceed the minimum by a margin of only 112 units. Because the City presently complies with the housing rule by such a small margin, the staff recommends against a reduction in density from R-7 to R-4.5. In order to assist in addressing the concerns raised at the July 17th hearing relating to density and preservation of the natural amenities of the site, the staff recommends the application of the (PD) Planned Development overlay in conjunction with the R-7 zone. This designation will require Planning Commission review of any significant development of the property and will afford the developer and the city additional flexibility to address these concerns. If the Council generally favors a reduction in density allowed on Bull Mountain, this issue should be evaluated in conjunction with periodic review. TIGARD Alt NN1NG AREA 'I U RBAN PLA - IT EXHIBIT A AREA AGREEMENT BAN PLANNING WAS INGTO COUNTY"TIOARD UR , ! Il 10, l.1 ,r') , J.. - ~ , ' :t ..fir non , t , ~.•"3 s 1• T 11.1 } ! , JI / ` : \ t • =:a'y~ -11y'\7l1 ) t ` , 1983 I`uull fs _ ~ 1 .~,1 PLANNING AREA ""IIl1"M BOUNDARY ACTIVE PLANNING AREA1 k+ t AREA OF INTEREST