City Council Packet - 07/17/1989
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an
RE17J AR MEETING AGENDA agenda item, please sign on the appropriate
Cai H BUSINESS AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available,
d JULY 17, 1989, 5:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the start
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items
~ 13125 SW HALL BLVD. are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer
F' w TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting
either the Mayor or city Administrator.
5:30 o STUDY SESSION
a. Policy Issues Discussion
b. Board/Committee Liaison Reports:
Mayor Edwards
Councilor Eadon
Councilor Johnson
Councilor Kasten
Councilor Schwartz
6:30 1. WORKSHOP MEE= - Mary Tobias, President of Tualatin Valley Economic
Development Corporation
7:30 2. BUSINESS MEETING:
2.1 Call to Order and Roll Call
2.2 Pledge of Allegiance
2.3 Call to Staff and Council for Non Agenda Items
77,35 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please)
7:40 4. PUBLIC REARING - ZONE CHANGE ANNEOTION ZCA 89-06 DANIEL NPO #3
To consider approval of annexation of 40 acres of unincorporated
Washington County land to the City of Tigard. Also to authorize a zone
change from Washington County R-6 (6 units/acre) to City of Tigard R-7
(7 units/acre). IOCATION: South end of S.W. 135th Avenue (WCIM 2S1 4,
Tax Lot 700.)
o Public Hearing Opened
o Declarations or Challenges
o Summation by Community Development Staff
o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
o Reco nendation by ccumLanity Developwnt Staff
o Council Questions or Camients
o Public Hearing Closed
o Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 89-
Ordinance No. 89-
8:30 5. NON AGENDA ITEMS: Fan Council and staff
8:40 6. ECECU E SESSION: The Tigard city council will go into Executive
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to
discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and
periling litigation issues.
9:00 7. ADJOLUUZ=
cw/ccagenda717
TICAM CPPY COUNCIL - AGE2M UPDWE
JllLY 17, 1989
o STUDY SESSION
o Park Levy Update - Disci rn and review of mai rd -
rg~~ir~near,l~ over 5 years; also reviewed draft of information ad
for newspaper.
O Nb`iM2 - Discussion. Council consensus: if assurance rec2d from
County that proposed projects would be completed, then City will
stand an positive side of iso .
O USA as Storm draiM @( update. City Engineer advised issue
scbeduled for hearing before Boundary com issian - July 27. State
ToAklature cbanged ~atieaLC So sewer district Could also
administer- Storm drainage.
o Waiver of OLOC City Processing Flee: Oregon steemeaders requested
waiver far event on. 7/21/89. Council consensus was to waive fee.
1. WORKSHOP MEE=G - Mary Tobias, President of Tualatin Valley Economic
Development Corporation
Budget and Issues Review
2. BUSINESS MEETING:
Roll Call: Ea absent
3. VISITOR'S AGENDA
o D.K. Paul, 14137 SW Fia mo Creek Cbiat, president of Colony Creek
EkEEK KWs Assn. - Requesting Adjacent area to be downzaned from R-
12 to R-7. Council Consensus: Mr. Pahl to contact NPO to
determine- if they would request CPA. Also, staff will work with
Mr. Paul an process.
4. PUBLIC HARING - ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 89-06 DANIEL NPO #3
To consider approval of annexation of 40 acres of unincorporated
Washington County land to the City of Tigard. Also to authorize a zone
change from Washington County R-6 (6 units/acre) to City of Tigard R-7
(7 units/acre). LOCATION: South end of S.W. 135th Avenue (WCIM 2S1 4,
Tax Lot 700.)
o Public Hearing Opened
o Public Hearing Closed
o by Council:
Resolution 89-57 - Jo/Sr- UA - (forward atxwooLtion request to
Boundary Ct~ni rn)
Ordinance, No. 89-20 - no iYi71'ICN `!D CALL To vam
FDFICN: Jo/Ka - Directed staff to proceed with first;at;mis
with Washington County planning staff to gain apprmal of ?,one
Cbange Request to R-4.5. (Note: Addn'1 public hearing sball
be necessary.)
Meeting recessed at 9:07
C
.71WL SESSIC\ CONTINM:
Waeter Quality Standards: City Er lTx 'w l d. EQC Bearing in
Cbrrvai 7 i s on 7/21. EM Staff to prepare - appears
favorable, but final rem 3at!an riot yet krxxan.
5. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: Norse i
6. EXDC[T= SESSION: The Tigard city council went into Executive Session
at 9:20 .m. under the of O
p provisions RS 192.660 (i) (d), (e), & (h) to
discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and
pending litigation issues.
Y
7. ADJOCUUZ1EdT: 9:34 p.m.
cw/ccagenda717
i
C
7
t`
i
r
i
i
t
s
f
I{
f
ttr
t
3, 1
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MEMMG MaIIMS - J OLY 17, 1989
1. ILL CALL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Valerie Johnson,
Joe Kasten, and John Schwartz. Staff Present: Pat Reilly, City
Administrator; Ken Elliott, Legal Counsel; Liz Newton, Senior Planner;
Cliff Scott, Operations Manager (for Park Levy Discussion only);
Catherine Mieatley, Deputy Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Egineer.
2. siuw sE55ICN:
a. Proposed Park Levy - Council reviewed material from staff entitled
"Preliminary Schedule for Park Levy Implementation" which outlined
project phasing over five years. City Administrator noted
implementation would be "pay as you go." He advised the estimated
additional maims required per year was outlined. By the
fifth year, approximately 3.5 additional eirployees (primarily
seasonal workers) may be needed. Presently, the Parks Division has
a total of five full-time-equivalent employees. It was noted
Systems Development Charges (SDCs) collected for parks cannot be
used for maw purposes.
In response to a question by Councilor Johnson, discussion followed
on the Budget committee review of the proposed parks levy. It was
consensus of Budget Committee that Coil would review the
l potential impact of maintenance costs before reccmending a ballot
title for the parks levy.
There was discussion on the methodology used to estimate the
increased maintenance hours for the implementation of the park
levy. City Administrator noted the hours were calculated by using
national standards; there was the possibility the figures could be
either less or more than the estimate. It was noted the Parks
Division was responsible for 13 parks as well as the Senior Center
and Civic Center. Landscaping maintenance for the Civic Center was
labor intensive.
Senior Planner Newton briefly described the ballot title being
prepared for Council consideration on July 24. The Senior Center
improvements would not be included on the ballot title which was
discussed as a possibility at a prior meeting.
b. MSTIP/2 - City Administrator distributed two letters: (1) Letter
dated July 14, 1989, from Bruce Warner of Washington County to Pat
Reilly; and (2) Letter dated June 15, 1989, from Donald Adams,
Oregon Department of Transportation to Bruce Warner of Washington
County. City Administrator advised Mr. Warner had written in
response to Tigard's concerns about the completion of Scholls Ferry
Read as a part of MSTIP/1. Discussed was the possibility of
transferring a portion of funds allocated to Farmington Road
City Council Minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 1
inprovernents to the Scholls Ferry project. City AcbUnistrator
advised that when talking to Mayor Cole of Beaverton, he was
unaware of this transfer. City Engineer advised Beaverton and the
county would have to agree on this in order for this to proceed
without any problems.
Council then discussed the MSTIP/2 proposal scheduled for the
September election. Several topics were discussed including the s
desire to be cooperative and responsive to the needs of neighboring
cities such as Tualatin and Sherwood while seeking scene assurances
that MSTKIP/2 projects for the southeastern part of the County were
completed as presented. Councilor Kasten, liaison to the Committee
reviewing the MSTIP proposals, noted Tigard should continue to
seek good relations with the County.
Council consensus was that if the County could offer a reasonable
guarantee that the projects proposed for MSTIP/2 would be r
completed substantially as presented, the City of Tigard would be
on the positive side of this issue; otherwise, the City would
remain neutral.
City Administrator advised the bid opening for improvements on
Canterbury Lane (MSI-IP/1) was scheduled for July 22.
C. City Engineer updated Council on the formation of a drainage
district as part of the Unified Sewerage Agency. A public hearing i;
before the Boundary Commission was scheduled for July 27. He noted
C, the State Legislature approved an amendment allowing existing
sanitary sewer districts to act also as the agency f
terry or storm ~
drainage.
d. Mary Tobias, President, of the Tualatin Valley Economic Development
Corporation, visited with Council on the Corporation's budget and
the scope of work.
Ms. Tobias noted the mission of the Tualatin Valley Econoanic is
Developnent Corporation was to foster a positive economic climate`
and facilitate the development of job cpportunities in the Tualatin
Valley. She referred to their budget document and reviewed expense f.
and revenue projections for fiscal year 89/90. Ms. Tobias advised
one of the key responsibilities of TVEDC was to act as a
facilitator between public and private sectors.
She advised that interest areas of TVEDC included the westerly
bypass, water quality issues, and schools/educational issues.
Ms. Tobias updated Council on the western beltway issue. She
advised direction hinged on the eutoame of the LUBA appeal. She
advised that the TVEDC's role was that of "intervener" and their
objective would be to assure timeliness for cam*ricement of the
project. She noted the importance of a high level of public
awareness and education.
C City Council Minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 2
There was discussion on the composition of members of TVIDC's Board
of Directors. Ms. Tobias noted those seats which were reserved for
representation of certain arganizations within the unity.
e. City Administrator presented a request by the Oregon Steel Headers
Association for a waiver of the OLCC processing fee for a one-lay
liquor license. This event would occur on July 21, as part of the
Cruisin' Tigard festivities. Consensus of City Council was to
waive the fee.
3. VISMMIS AGUM:
o D.K. Paul, 14137 SW Fanno Creek Court, Tigard, OR 97223,
testified as President of the Colony Creek Iicueownexs' Association.
Mr. Paul referred to an area on the east side of Hall Boulevard
located south of and adjacent to Colony Cheek Estates. He advised
homeowners in the area were concerned with the R-12 zoning of the
property-
Senior Planner Newton advised this property had been designated
R-12 since 1983.
After Council discussion, Senior Planner Newton advised the
residents' NPO could review and make a reccmiendation to City
Coil to initiate a Couprehensive Plan Amerrhnent if they so
agreed. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment must
go through a public
hearing process.
Councilor Schwartz suggested that Mr. Paul also contact the
property owner to determine whether he/she was willing to downzone
the property to R-7 as was being suggested.
Mayor EJwards requested Mr. Paul leave the petition containing
signatures of those people in favor of a dcwnzone with staff.
Staff was directed to assist Mr. Paul in working through the steps
for this issue.
4. FUEUC H@ IUM - ZCNE CHXVM ANMWffUR ZCA 89-06, DANIM NPO 13.
To consider approval of annexation of 40 acres of unincorporated
Washington County land to the City of Tigard. Also to authorize the
zone change from Washington County R-6 (6 units/acre) to City of Tigard
R-7 (7 units/acre). IiO=CN: South end of southwest 135th Avenue
(WCIM 2S1 4, Tax Lot 700).
a. Public hearing was opened.
b. There were no declarations or challenges.
City Council Minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 3
C. Senior Planner Newton summarized this agenda item. Staff report
included the following: The annexation request consisted of one I
40-acre parcel contiguous to the City of Tigard. The property was
located within Tigard's area of interest. Included in the council
packet was a resolution directing the annexation request be
forwarded to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Gover=ent
Boundary Ccanission. Also included in the Council packet, was a
proposed ordinance to change the zone designation from Washington
County R-6 to City of Tigard R-7 in conformance with the City's
adopted Conprehensive Plan.
d. RA;alic Testimony:
Proponents
o Jerry Sessums, 21550 SW 65th, Tualatin, Oregon representing
Northwest Geotechnical, advised the applicant was requesting
annexation to the City of Tigard because they wished to
connect their future development to Tigard's sewer system. He
noted the zone change request was necessary because the City
of Tigard did not have an R-6 zone (which was the County's
zoning designation for this property).
He advised the proposed development would be less than four
units per acre with approximately 150 single family units on
40 acres. He said he met with several adjoining property
owners and also sent out a mailing to affected parties.
Mr. Sessums reviewed the studies ccupleted for the area which
included geotechnic surveys and a traffic study.
He advised they had had excellent response from the NPO.
O,~ponents
o Tom Bohan, 14115 SW Fern, Tigard, Oregon outlined several
issues including the need for the widening 135th Street since
it was dangerous to walk along this street. He noted possible
adverse envirormexital impact because of the deve1cpmnt.
Mr. Bohan was concerned about the overall planning of the
entire area with particular enphasis on transportation
issues. He noted the area was steep; increased traffic would
be hazardous.
o Rod Kvistad, 13535 SW Fern, Tigard, Oregon opposed the
proposal. He ccameented that before the City took steps to
accept any proposal for developtn..nt, they should wait for
Completion of the Bull M amain Traffic Study. He was
concerned with the volume of traffic as well as the
maintenance of 135th during the construction. He asked if
135th Avenue was to be upgraded, who would be required to pay
for it.
C City Council Minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 4
He noted when the developer was presenting the proposal to the Water District, the total projection was for over 500 homes.
Mr. Kvistad suggested the zoning designation be scaled down
from R-7 to R-4.5 which would be more compatible with the
surrounding area.
Mr. Kvistad agreed with the following issues contained in the
staff report: Special attention needed to be paid to drainage j.
and sewer issues. He further advised the present condition of
135th Avenue and Fern Street should be maintained before and
after construction.
F
o Gary Steele, 12645 SW 135th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon advised,
the area's Neighborhood Association met the week before. He
said they were opposed to R-7 zoning and noted most homes in :
the area were on one-half acre (or larger) parcels. He
advised incxeased density would adversely affect the value of
their homes and recommended the zoning be reduced to R-4.5.
He also requested the hares in the develop wnt be restricted {
so minimum square footage would be at least 1,800 square feet.
Mr. Steele advised a street local improvement district for
S.W. 135th Avenue had been formed and funded by the neighbors;
he requested any damage to the street, because of
C construction, be repaired by the developer.
Mr. Steele referred to safecy issues for school children
walking along 135th to catch the school bus. He said he hoped
the road would be developed wide enough to allow for
pedestrian walkways and suggested sane measures to slow
traffic.'
He noted problems with
drainage in the area due to
construction and tree removal. He would like to see a
development rule wherein 50 percent of the trees six inches
in diameter or more could not be removed. He was concerned
about sewage and wanted to be assured that the line would be
developed large enough to handle the increased demand.
o Larry Westerman, 13665 SW Fern, Tigard, Oregon acknowledged
that problems with development was outside the scope of this
public hearing. However, he thought the issues should be
brought forth for future consideration. Mayor agreed with
Mr. Westerman's co mnents and thanked him for noting the
purpose of the public hearing.
o Larry T. St. Pierre, 13992 SW Fern Street, Tigard, Oregon,
noted concerns with sewer pumping capability and advised the
existing pumps were already running 24 hours a day.
City Council Minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 5
o John Lewis, 13990 SW Fern Street, Tigard, Oregon, agreed with
the previous testimony of the opponents. He noted the
steepness of 135th Street and was concerned with icy whiter
conditions which occur in the area - this would be an
increased safety hazard with additional traffic.
He also noted concern with tree removal advising it would be
likely that if some trees were removed, other trees would need
to be removed later because of damage received during
construction. This would mean a loss of a buffer zone.
He advised drainage and sewage pumping capacity were serious
issues.
o Dr. V.W. Kaczynski., 12985 SW 135th Street, Tigard, Oregon.
Dr. Kaczynski noted his professional qualifications to
address water runoff issues. He said develcp rant of the area
would represent one of the most serious technical challenges
for the City of Tigard. He referred to the steepness of the
property and said the soil was the poorest of the entire area.
He advised that drainage problems with regard to the Tualatin
clean-up effort would need to be considered. He noted that
all annexations and future development should be carefully
considered and added he thou this proposal represented
piecemeal annexation.
o Kathy Baxter, 12950 SW 135th Street, Tigard, Oregon, noted
similar concerns as outlined in previous testimony. Her
concerns included:
- Safety for school children catching the school bus.
- Inadequate 20-foot buffer between this development
and existing homes.
- Fhvirornmental issues should be reviewed; the loss of
additional trees would mean wildlife would be
further impacted.
Rebuttal
o Jerry Sessums responded to opponents' testimony:
- S.W. 135th had been improved under informal LID and he
was not aware if it had been constructed to any specific
standards. The developer would need to take samples to
determine at what standard the road should be
maintained.
- Annexation was being requested because Unified Sewerage
Agency would not service the development until it had
been annexed to the City of Tigard.
C City Council Minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 6
- At the developer's presentation to the Water District,
they displayed drawings which illustrated potential
build-out of the area. He outlined the sewage
facilities and noted where easements must be obtained for
hookups and pumping stations.
With regard to the zoning issue, Tigard Is R-7 was the
only comparable zone to Washington County's R-6.
He further advised that Geotechni.cal reports on soils
have indicated development was feasible.
- This area would be in the City of Tigard School District.
Road construction specifications would be completed
within stricter guidelines than was required by the City
of Tigard.
Right-of-way requirements would be complied with
although the developer would prefer a narrower street
which would tend to reduce traffic speed.
In response to a question from councilor Johnson, city
Engineer advised that the 135th Avenue would be required to be
developed to interim City standards. Mr. Sessums advised
that they intended to satisfy any requirements the City
stipulates.
e. Recommendation by City Engineer:
City Engineer noted the subdivision development was not under
consideration at this public hearing. staff had been informally
working with the developer on a development proposal. He advised
that development concerns should be brought to the attention of
residents' NPO and CPO representatives.
He noted city policy has been to encourage annexation if a
property owner requests annexation. This request was in
ccerpliance with the Coaprehensive Plan. He advised that the zone
change was not really a change, but was required through an
intergovernmental agreement with the County. This
intergovernmental agreement stated that the City of Tigard would
adapt zoning which was most similar to the County's zoning.
In response to a question by councilor Johnson, the City Engineer
advised that the NE Bull Mountain study was scheduled to be
completed latex this summer. Zhe study should be available before
develcpenent of the property.
f. Public hearing was closed.
City council minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 7
g. Council consideration:
Councilor Johnson noted much of the testimony received tonight was
not germane to the issue before Council. She, however, wanted to
assure the citizens that Cou=il was aware of these issues and of
the need to oversee developanent of the area. She supported the
annexation.
Council Kasten shared many of the same concerns as Councilor
Johnson with regard to the developnent of the Bull Mountain area.
He noted he felt the City of Tigard would be more responsive to the
issues raised by the citizens who testified; therefore, he favored
the annexation.
Councilor Schwartz noted the issues before Council did not include
many of those expressed as concerns during testimony. The
appropriate time to talk about these concerns would be at the time
of the development public hearings. He said he was in favor of
the annexation.
Mayor was also in favor of the annexation as he felt that it would
be advantageous for the City of Tigard to retain jurisdiction over
this area before development. He noted he was interested to
receive more information concerning the testimony from
Mr. Kaczynski wherein he noted the soils were poor on Bull
Mountain. Mayor advised it had been his tuxlexstandiryg this was
among the finest agricultural land in the area.
h. RESOIITI ON NO. 89-57 A RE50UTI ON INITIATING ANNEXATION TO THE
CITY OF TIGARD OF A TERRITORY AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "All AND
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B" ATTACK. (ZCA 89-06) (DWn
i. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to
approve Resolution No. 89-57.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of council present.
j. ORDINANCE NO. 89-20 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE aV NGE (ZCA 89-06) (DMIEL) AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
k. Discussion on the proposed ordinance followed. Senior Planner
Newton noted City Council could delay consideration of the zoning
issue. The Urban Planning Area Agreement with Washington County
outlined provisions that if a zone change was considered, the
County Planning staff should be consulted by the Tigard Planning
staff.
After discussion, there was a motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded
by Councilor Kasten, to direct staff to proceed with negotiations
with Washington County to seek approval of an R-4.5 zoning of the
area.
C City Council Minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 8
The motion was adapted by unanimous vote of Council present.
It was noted the zone change would require a separate public
hearing at a later date. Mr. Sessums asked he be notified if the
property should be downzoned.
(Council meeting recessed at 9:07 p.m.)
5. STmY SESSSC K TC PICS CONTINUED - VATM QaUA ' Y STAiMUMS:
City Engineer advised Council of the progress concerning phosphate
standards for the Tualatin River which were to be in place by 1993 with
a draft plan adopted by 1990. After a hearing before the Hearings
Officer and negotiation with DEIQ staff, it appears that the DEQ staff
will support less restrictive standards until March of next year. An
Envirorm ental Quality Connission hearing was scheduled for Friday,
July 21 in Corvallis.
6. EXHCUIZVE SESSICK: M e Tigard City Council went into Executive Session
at 9:20 p.m., under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), and (h)
to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and
pending litigation issues.
7. ADJOURRHM: 9:34 P.M.
Approved by the Tigard City Council on August 28, 1989.
Ca~,~~ Gv
Deputy Recorder - City of Ti
-City of Tigard
cw/Council2
M:\OFFSVCS\
City Council Minutes - July 17, 1989 - Page 9
qijj
~f
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice 7-6311
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising A
• FC'EI~~g
City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice J44 10 190 P. O. Box 23397 g
Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 13 Duplicate Affidavit
r
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLf;,^"T'^`~
STATE OF OREGON, PUBLIC HEARING
u r c,--Y'SAvT Ya. tS' d L';SP'."'-.a
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' The rolowingwill °bd?consideredrl?y~ theTid °~CC1J3~1;. I. 10
18139,rat 7,30 P M at Tigard Civic >renter, Towa HtltoOmAA Ha11,
i, Dortb.a Marty Bdulevard;~;Ilga`fQ, regon Further ~n+oriua io►'mayj'Tde~ob fi%Ird the r
Development Dire
g first duly sworn Community ecorder at the a loca oor~t?
bein , depose and say 4 rectororCityt RA
Director, or his principal clerk, of the < by caning 638-4171 Yogi areaiAted to submit tten a mon jlra ce
a newspaper of general circulation as sbffth ;public bearing; .`w`ritten aad oral.testimyl bi~codnsid
and 193.020; published at heangThe publteyhean~v(!illtlM'r,dpducted iri acgtlthb
afor s ~d countx and state that the agpiic"Ule Cka~ter;28 32 of the Tigard 1Viunf~fpale aatlrttles o1 }
u 1 i c fi e ar i n g ZCA 89-(j- i d re adopted by the Caun ~ and avallabl at City all x R .
ZONE" } ATION ZC 89-06 IEI~ iPO 3 For IZ a
printed copy of which is heret CHANGE ANNE
o annexp~y~,tn aanex 40 acres of uriisscopo3a~W #n,tp
a n ~CoUnty land to tried.•.
entire issue of said newspaper for C City oiFTigard and 2) a zone c4ange flroik► a§hlington L~aunty R-6 to Cityab L
consecutive in the following 1'~getTdt7zoa(n~'de§fgnation0?tfE PreseCauntyl2eidewtl>fr~
issues `units per acre,Washington Couaty) LOCATIO southt#d oY 1$5Ii1Adu
~WC7~t1Niy2$1~4'C'si t?5~ ) Ks , r s = t:
July 6, 1989
TT$3 Pui~li~f}uly;e~i~,.*1~~.~ x a$f~~ ate
Subsc 'iadand sworn efore me thi. 9'
u
otary Public for Oregon
My Commission Expires: 9/20/92
AFFIDAVIT f;
d
r
JULY 1989
SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY
. 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2:OOPM--7:OOPM 7:30PM FANNO CRI(
INDEPENDENCE COURT - TH&THCR CLEAN-UP - THCR
DAY
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
5:30PM COUNCIL 7:OOPM NEIGHBOR. 2:OOPM-7:OOPM 6:OOPM LIBRARY
STUDY SESSION WATCH - TH COURT - TH&THCR PROGRAM - TH
6:30PM COUNCIL 7:30PM PhT1( BD - _
BA - TH & THCR CDCR 7:OOPM LIBRARY
7:0PM PLANNING BOARD - THCR 7:OOPM MAYORS BD
COM. - TH & COM. - THCR
16 17 18 17:30AM ECON. 19 20 21 22
DEV/DAVIDSON
5:30PM COUNCIL 7:OOPM UTILITY & 7:OOAM YMCA TH CRUISIN'
STUDY SESSION FRANCHISE - THCR - TIGARD
7:30PM COUNCIL 2:00PM-7:OOPM
BA - TH & THCR COURT - TH&THCR
7:30PM NPUST,
6, 7, 8
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
6:30PM COUNCIL 2:OOPM-7:OOPM 6:OOPM LIBRARY
STUDY SESSION COURT - TH&THCR PROGRAM - TH
7:30PM COUNCIL
BA - TH & THCR
30 31
ke/OO1CR
TH Town Hall
Department Head Staff Meeting: 8:30 - 10:30AM (THCR) THCR - Town Hall Conference Room
Second Tuesday - Attorney Trials: 9AM - 12:30PM (TH & THCR) CDCR - Community Development Conference Room
Every Wednesday - Municipal Court: 2:30 7PM TH & THCR CSCR - Community Services Conference Room
Every Th-iday - Municipal Court: 12:30 - 5PM (TH & THCR 1 MOD - Modular
AGENDA tTEM N 2 - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE A 14, '1
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council
wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you
first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City
Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED
-I- lease ri+
3j)!je-- N~,►,,Qr~• n...c w~, --bLA- tcsctc cth f ar_ to d ~c~t~ P('
An0 A5 /,f/~rLATc.~ t ldr"~ (~!i
5WiRgnL a-P-P (ate- 7,Feo
S a s S-~j 4+-~w CU! 61t - n 3d
e~ l ~3~ ~w {~,~r.r~ C►r~--~'~ Cab --ill 5~
~P ~rt~I~a /Z e~Sh~~on ~t~uha ~i 1433 s~ v n~ro Clt 1p - 3`1`293/
r rol I W&S 5W-finno Or L L (020 -1 C5~
7 t)Le,t t ru 1,4z55 :5u), fZwer, Lp 01 /.280
i
~r'o:h,,,o c2 -0969
1 -7 4645 ~ralfl. mss-, % ! 4 5- sriJ d 10
H C,
R
r
b
e
1 ~Gl C_+.~ lk2G~ ~ ~av g c~ LSC.+ Sc.J ~'a-h rt ~7 c°_„2 - •D2 ; G c
~ -~,,vyyr ~~t.c*z.~n~' 8 3 ~D ~G.~ a r~ rl o Gie.C (~i2 •
g,3 Lo
14.
c) -7
&A, Ct
~~-tom - f
-Oro
fig' ~ti7 era~z,L-.,S rq„LJ yT~~
(6"-55: Sw' Ca'"F' Cl!~ 9265
7 ~a~c~~ ~~a35 l[I• Bann o ~ . ~ 1 JG ~-7~:
7 r.y~0-S SW ~fiU D G~ ~t~ ~T, j 1f,~D, OTC . `17 Zzzl .
47
t
r:
e.
r"
-7
1~l17 5 r~ RvPt - Ll
~jw
T 1 ~~~•~~J' t f,
D79 ~ -pass
Act rvr)oR - Pia 3 - G
GOO
cry . g\.c~~v Q (0 3R--l.S~-°~ r.
g y~ sw ~'~•,t~o c K ~~y .9~y
00 62
w StJ ~K° `~y~ lv 3 - X53:
gz~o
e5' 5-6v 61,( lot 63'1 -700
anti`'
C~z
J
O Sam l~ y-
16Zr 4' ;~(S5
94
C
qjzz-q
~ N To I W T If s,
fq8j low sc.J QL
co Cam.
fe 11
am,5 sco ca- (4e)4-493a
8Z75 S(-U ('01b Gw
Q ava
02- SLJ
3 0. K Go 3 3 o SZV C s, e ~c cy- 6?`~- 6t5IY
n*-tI on &-AQ 6W ODLOW CgEfjl~ CT -Z~6L
Y Sgo ~aLv Gem cl-- cDQK-q - 909
_ ~l✓L(.155L--tJ Zsc.~hitrJ('~_. ~~(.~D--~1/.c~~ .
DATE July 14, 1989
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print the information)
Item Description: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 PUBLIC
HEARING - ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 89-05
DANIEL -NPO #3
Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) ,
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
I a s~ i n
117 19t P2 /V
RA WES+EZ-M nl ~bbS SW FE ~
ePL-:~,.
5 i - P. 2~ f 3~92- sw f=(ERvJ
~cz AS i I 9<6-S SUJ l3S_
~ z.~~~o sw ra5 T ~R
F,.RK`( ~551~.►M.S Ale~~~s'c Gr~ares~!-tuLa~c. aS~srGw~~
mown-
FOR PARK LEVY IMPLEMENTATION
PH..A,_S E V
PRELIMINP.RY SCHEDULE pHA
pIIAS
PHA
PHAI
PROS
PHASING:
Summerlake park X
1.9 Acre Land Acq• X
Footbridge at pam
. (2) Soft Trail X X
Foot Bridges X
Tennis Courts (2) X X
Basketball Court (1) X X
pathway Lighting x
parking X
East playground X
Restroom West X
• picnic Shelter X X
picnic Tables X
Benches Area X
• planting Play
Eastside Asphalt Trail
Irrigation (3 acres)
• Lawn seeding Playground
Winterlake Fanno Creek park X
Land Acq•/Parking X
• Foot Bridge Relocate X X X
• Meadow Plantings
• East Entry
Bike Paths
JMMMWAM
Page 2
PROJECTS PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III PHASE IV PHASE V
Cook Park
. Play Ground X
. Restroom Renovation R
. Riverfront Earthwork,
Bark Stabilization,
Irrigation, Landscaping x
. Irrigation Soccer Fields x
. Riverfront Development R
. Picnic Tables &
Benches x
. Asphalt Trails X
Greenways Park Paths
. Englewood g
. Pathfinder/Genesis X
. Durham Road-Cook Park R
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL
MAINTENANCE REQUIRED (Staff Hours)
7
Impact by Phase 68020 990 1760 2290
Cumulative Impact 680 2200 3190 4950 7240
br/impact2.cs
F
Page 3 1
SUMMARY
The maintenance impact of labor hours and equipment is based on the Park
Improvement being made over a 5 year period.
These costs as needed, would be phased into the budget as each project is
scheduled for completion.
Some of the equipment items would replace some of the more labor intensive
equipment and methods that are now being used.
Additional staff hours needed to maintain the added facility, i.e., grounds
and paths at the completion of the projects have been estimated at 7240.
These may vary, depending on the types of equipment and materials available
at that time.
Additional and replacement equipment will be needed to maintain the added
turf, bike paths, park entryways and parking lots. This equipment consists
of: pickups, large mower, utility trailers, brush chipper, parking lot
vacuum sweeper and blowers.
br/summ.cs
`s
y
n
n
~
. , 1
.
.CII~~
_ " .tr,~.,~
i
I
c '
S
1
,,.,.4... r, . a-~-~~ ;w~.~.,,..~~-;r_. _ -
~ A-- .,v:.
- .~a.....~~.
.'.[Tlj 4liji P 11If~i1 tjl 1 t i{i~7 1{I 4 41 I{l {1~4{T 1 114 1{ I(I1j1 1{ 3( Ij4 4S~ j41{61011}P114 f I-1 {1 Ilf 111111 1jI l11 Ill 111 111 pl 111 ii... .v ~
_ ~ r 11 i( ~j-.i~ ~l: tlPl 1'1'.4, fi~~-'~11'1~~~~4,4Er~►i~ Ilil~~+
'4 ( i
' ~ IF THIS NICR)FILMED I; ~ 2 3 4 _ 5 _ 6 _ . T... . 8 8 0 .I _..1
it
DRRMING IS L£SS CLEAR THAN ~ ~ - ~
1NiS NOTICE, IT IS DIE IO i
i
tHE pUALITY OF t1e caIOINAL , _ S ~ ~ ~ IZ OZ 6t 94 Li 94 ' Sf bt £i ZI 41 01 g __B_ _ g __..5 b - E -Z 4
DRaNINC. as ez e(i iz az z
~ _ ~ i~7fH411N~IN1~Nll~lllllliul ~ .
3 ~ ~ ~ ~
1
i
~F;
- ~ v Y~ _ _
' :t..
Sf.~:~ ~ -
TICWIRU'S 5'~S?EM - C1'S ~ TO Yt?~J
-a:v~er.~s,~;r£7iisi~x~izsss~-~¢ ~-an7+.r~y~a:;sF-sai;; :ace
ri~e~eau-~e~a~arc ki~ate~~z5? ~:es~'Csei?ar'trieav~
~ TMs:
~,ser iaz am oe' ~aas'1`~c ~ So~'.'~ ~ rs
;;~i:aa:r,~~ 5: °.-,s c,aEi6. a.; I~ ~ at am 36,E€.
raft pry g'~'°~ 2es t~ 4'ky's airy tnatprae tae pariL
The parse systems t~ i-s&~tt~t tart rests agt, :da>yi sas?3a i~ ~
:~*.aee~~ssa'~~.~
~':`galsf puxs arm m 5~tri :~eeEgaszrs :ems m ;ri.^^y
:searrrai.::¢s:~isa::.sa:iz,xas. aarst,-i R~~3 €'~rd's;_ati;y
.;x ie?9a8::i~ ?asks atsd tai 3~td Sdaster ~Suaae,
Fa.:r~ C_~eea s~ Coca rri.~.. ~ ; ^~•pr:~eK4erts ;a~,,.;F.~ W the 3£aser ~:z~
'j ..:..~.~s s+~r:,c::s.iesto~::::h.~c>..~assxgisx; 1€emQi
~-~xz,
tW a t::~ strop ur+aed taPi :iE Par's a~ 3~:s: Board m
;~o rde tee 5 uut ~ ;c~ti a ~:.pre~.~;ve ?a.~ic systex. !:se ~.^d'nea;s~csi;e~ '
xrete :ai!aai ire~ove:rzs:s that, i5~astrr~t~, sreud begs :o rs;,a~d thx : eese~
at;cnnaf oppe~uni?ies a.s:2atre w ;`:gsrd> citizens a Sas:sertaie, Cook a=d Fa,asa
~Ttiw'k Parks
'I~..e spnr~f~ cmp~:eaents ~csifeee are lama" ~ as at
~t~i3nal pea: i p?ar„.zrs, severs: ciaren wx'ta~^7a a^v :Haar ~x:rao{:exrarc,~
ant durtsai~x: sy the i s.~ iirard prrvie<'s prcraoaed ~ eack;~r4t ere iistod cr.
c a iailowin8 pages ~'tsa nrcmr.~aemled ieved of ia:p~ ie !5aught u ;rarufe'.a
°pr,,;_~ {WEI -s,~,«,~,,.4,!e , vr~I have t.'•,c a w va;c ae the fescrt otaar P~ i
system. Like other aervisen: a good park aysLem does juu happen. In order to b::ng
the pbm to fruition, funds mttat he available to pay !or the impravemeata. The Septeta•
bar 19th ballot will roatain a measttro to ettablisir a perk ttwy over the oast fve years I
to pay for the park improvements idontifutd on tho tdlawing pagan.The total cast to
the dozens ofilgard- approximately SI.B million. Coat W the taxpayer- 2,U51,640
arassessed v;tiue or $18.40 on an 580,066 home. Approva3 this park Levy would
~ insure thatTgard's park system improves m meet the needs of a growing population.
Vote September 19th. The tutttre otTigard's park system is up to yowl
Cf 1 i ~ ~~~RV
~ ,
n
i
W
? Vim' ~ L~
~1
.
a ~
w~•
~
s ;
,r:
l
r i,,% ~ ' r1ti?,~
~ ~
~P ~ _
i
ttiryttttttrtrirttrtttl Illjl sT1ttIlQ31 ftl 4"
I{t~ ll~llll~al fle~lin f!. q _L_ ~ ~ I~~ !I t I I` I I t F.
I. ~~mT F-~.,.~ i fT(3111 irIIIIItI llttlitt'tlilltlltttlittl
S R I ~17tti~i ~ n'I I!I 1! I I 11 ~ Vt'
~i, 9 1•! I i ! Ilt!
NOTf, iF THIS MIOROFItNED ~ ' 2 3 ~ _ 5 6 7 8 g ~ I I _ I
ORAWIt~ IS LESS CLEAR iHFN ~
THIS NOTICE, 1T IS OLE TO ~
~ 1}£ QUALITY OF Tf£ ORIGINAL ' ^
DRAMINO. ~ - _ _
p£-- _ _ _ _ ~
tiZ 8Z 1Z 9Z SZ 4Z £Z ZZ IZ- 02 81 81 11 91 5t 41 £I ZI it ~I 6 0 1 9 S 4 £ Z I e
+ntfuulttttltutltmlunGNt~tttrlttt~ttn
.
i ~
1. - j. ~ _
1 ~ i _
.c ~ . -
i
.ti ~ ~
N ..r~
f~
if ~
/..yam jFb
vyr ; ` J
"~4 f
}'v--•--• .tti
4: F:
µ t i5,. ,r~ }
Yt '1
~ ~ ~
ifrift t rte'!
.1' c ~
r .7
fr
y , V ,s
~ . ~.f
1' _ - i_ ` ~
i4 f ~
J ~ ~ /
Suaaeaertate Yitk, t04ated in naltr•
rest Tirsrd aolac~t zo 130th A:entte,
!a deslgnatsa as a communitp•isrel
I park thai aerwea dte entlro cfty. Tire
E
purpoas of a oanmunity party is w
SUMMfRLAKE BARK i pf4"+tde fecltitfw that can accom+no•
I date a vsefety of reereattsnal sct§v!-
Ea3t tks. CurranTtg Ure math att:ecCon
of thds park is Summar Lake an6 ;is
i.9 acrti!and a~~isitie^. aurrormdt~ open apaces.lnordu
Planting aitrubbery at playground to function es a community party
fawn deeding at lakeside addtt'arml taeiHtlea ere netsaaory to
Fridge at dam enhenw end dhreratfy recroetiotsed
Asphalt trail (1/3 mile) opportunltlea. TM IderUltlad tmprove•
menu ue {nterrtied to benoilt the
Foot briGgas {2) enUro community as welt as larier
irrigation t3 acresS neighborhood use.
Ptaygraund
Soft trail (ll3 mite)
Pathway lighting
West
Picnicshelter
Picnic tables
Reatl'OemS
Tennis courts 2 l
O
l
Basketball court , '
Winterlake playground
Parking „ey,~~„
Benches
Pathway lighting ;
x- J? .
_
A
t. ~ "~,i m
C s '~'x / ',n' ~in. rw t'om' '~:d><,,.
• h tx v~r'(~r • k "f'
.L w ~ Y
r.r ~ ~
bnference Ce~r Garden at Summerlake Park F"'~ T,~
• ..mow
~ -
s
.
~ ~.~--.T,~- r_
_n. ~ y _
Ilpp~Il~gttl ~qr t~ijilf t4i~/p~t~ip I~I~f>•61 Jln~tl![fh, tltjn~INLi~lrtl!till,l?~ITt~t~llt~r[t►rl►1tpl+P►I~r!~~1t►1~,,~rn~rlytlttlr(tlt~t,t~r,tlth~rlr~r,t~rt Q
2 3 4 _ 5 6., 7 B 9 _
NDTf: IF THIS MICaaFIlHEO i ,
CRAWItG IS lESS CLEAR THAN ~i i -
1HIa NOTICE. P. IS CIAI Ta i
7FE QUALITY CF 7FE ORIGSNAL I~ _ _ _
. _r.... f
OE 6Z d2 LZ 9Z SZ bZ EZ ZZ IZ OZ 81 81 LI 91 Sf bl EI ZI 11 OI 6 0 L 9 S b _ E Z i ,
.
'ml~udnn~nnlnn~Nw1(naNntN _ II
~r y'1~ { I
tr. i I~.
ae. . ; ~
..o...-.._..,_~
..«....xrv.ryF..nap,,.x.
f}_,t
~ ~
• n
~ ~ 7_ ~ rP. .~a
..r a
Fy~ a '7
r
Pons ~:t~
F9aiee Crfaai?Nfc it a ~y
rotated 7f ~ mil s toctat
oa areas ad(aunc 4o- Farrlo
CraafL TfiO&e ~ t a
pies b air. visa w p~cux or
te,7~. Ths pat[ also preaarres'saEuaaste
ahUatsds ind ha60at viueh
i e!iS9eooex~'m
FANN4 i~iC PARK a rap~y ~ewbp4tg ixa. fir pre
pa,~ ~s ~ inuaase the
puof;c srw aad patir+~aYs
aser:-r~WY.cwwensard~ tannet~tagtheSeniorCalder. Nan!
Civiz Center Downtorrn~ aro sa+r-
brex' recr~:~: roun~8+~
3fesarns`za:i::~
~rw a:Guisitdcc and P~'~S
f
1
llgard's systarn o! graehways ors
GREENYiAY PARKS PATHS i P~n~ to °~~`'tt'e city
~ a~ link togetl+er bicyda paths a+n!
othsr pslhwaya host grm~wgi anu
PachfinderlC~entnis41.9milee) ~ tol3owwatercoursesoreonnedwith
~ toaderay Wcyete Paths. when eom-
Englewr,~d i1.5 mi[esf
Dsttha.:. Etoads.,aak Perk canuectiah ~ Pik ~ wlll peoNde a net•
~ work of bioyeW and pedesWan routes
throughoottho ~hyr. fie greonway
tmprovameMa txing propoud now
either provide a eonneetfon between
existing pathways or complete a loop.
G I'~
~
~TM~
i ° -
a<
~
v
~.f .y
~ J
.r•.
c
9 '
a ~ . ip q"
k• t y
~iJ' ~'''i:• $ ~~rt;~
2, r~ :J
k ~,~~',p'
'Y~":
L ~IiF.1~' T !:l':r, .try b'•~. J
1~ i~ ~ i
i = - .r r,,, to ~ h. `.My,
;x
'
.
%.3'1' L_..~
_ -
' .
e
~s .
' ~ X17(1 t~l ifl lil tit lii~l~l 7(I~I~i. I~l~l it tilil~l ~f~l lil~l~l iti~T1 {i•f~l~l f~t~l{lit(Ti~l'~I ijl'(~T~l~~lllp lil{Iilltjlllil Itl~rlt't~t~lll I~I~lil,l(I~itl~lip~lil~ltl,1{ ~ ~
~ ~ I ~ I~ i 4 f t I'T'1'r~m I f 9 I 1 1 I
raTE: IF TNts NlamFlu~o ' l' - Z 3 4 _ 5 6.. 7 B 9 0 10 i -
oRa+Irr; Is Ir:ss cLeAR TNAH ' 'i ~ _
I'
mIS NOTICE, n Is ~ ro
7F£ QUALITY OF 7}E ORIGINAL ~
oRWINO. oe ea -az ~z g2 sz " fz~ ~ea ~z ra oz -si ei L1 91 ~SfY ~I ~EI ZI-il 01'e o~ ~ s - e z
F j
~M16NdNn1N~)~IN161N -
_
- ~..o-_.~
_ y~l t 4~r
I~ ~ ~
.
-TAI ~ ~~F,...._w„~~-......._--__j~r ~
Cooe?zrc s z z~ e'~~
rat~+es am ~Y lel~i of
t~z~are:r~
Pea~ie Effie ara 9ewvse
sa~e?~ r.~cer d;ssaors, ~
is reglireL' ~ a~iea tA?
"Tae
:ar ^ooc Fork
zre designed b arx~wnoate sle
:se a~ mu a open ale rr~ar-
fraa~ area :os recce
:mss are atir :mar~asac~e.
i
CQOK PARK
i
- ~:~':C::~-
:.taq::.:.'"l, ^rl"C: :+Tu4~G..Z .-nri RiP.i..,.u.L:cC'i~ :5_
v r
_ ~ Arr dk4~
r~ '1 CK:lt&::CD::;ZG:Sr.Y :ffiy,,,;,..i; L'f "_:~e"i~~~iF% I
f~ ►4 `O
~t
~ ~
_ _ ~ye ~ uutiu.'t?/tii'~~ ~ _.~e o(Gii(i WCW
:%7 _ _ -
z~
~~.P ~+~1, « - ~
-
• f i
,,1~' -
'.i ' 'fir ~ s
it
. ti~ ~
~ ~~lt 3
-
7'~ti~"
1 , 1
r A ~
' s
y 1 ...1 N
4 . kb
x
~ +@~
` ~
t, ~ d ~ ~
i T
~ N
a
I ; ,0
P~
y, i>
~ rj.~ ~
I+
T V at
d
5°
1
a c.
~ ^ n. ,
I `
ITYOFT
C !GARD
~
' 13126S.W. Hall 'an'" '
Blvd. uh" i N
P.0. Bar 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223 ~ "
~
(503 639-4171 -~I
~ 'Cook Parkat'ih~inRiverEdge
'
- ~ ;r~r.
:rte`: ~e - k4
_ .
L:.
'+1 I~i1lllflllllllllfllfl~llllltf mmrn-Ilr+ rlrftl~JlfJli ~IIIIrT~+lrllllrltllltllllllritlllllllll 1►
1 I+lrlrl!~~a[~r_l►4rl _ T fits i!.__. T ~ + i + i + ~ i I
I '~'~'i I t ~ ~ i ~I rf I p ~ ~ ! I.l j ! ~ !r Ti~il+l~lr~+l►
ROTE; IF THLS MICROFII}ffD ! _ ' Z 3 4 _ 5 B . _ 7 ® g p r ~
DRAPING 1S IESS IXEAR THAN -
THIS NOTICE, rI IS DUE 1b ~ - ~ .
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL ~ I
DRAPING.
oFFs-sa ez iz az ~z tiz e~ z~ +a oz Br ei ci al s~' _bi _ _.e( _zi~"i i ""oi a a_ t; e 5 - ti e ..___i I . ~
iMlllllllllll~IIIIl11N~IIIIRIU
fir,
~ r---___~ I
Ii r - ~*r _ ;
. ;
l ,
,
~ ,..nr . - • - - -
-eFZ+eo ,w. .
'
Sk--db Sew;
Department of Transportation
HIGHWAY DIVISION
rOWSCHMOT Region Io '
9002 SE MCLOUGHLIN, MILWAUKIE, OREGON 97222 PHONE 653-3090
i.
June 15, 1989 In Aeply Hefer To
File No.: C
Bruce Warner
Land-Use and Transportation Director
Washington County
150 N. First Ave.
Hillsboro, OR 97124
f
Re: Murray to Fanno on Scholls Highway
1
After I left our meeting I checked the project schedule for this E
job. Right-of-Way acquisition was not accelerated as much as
we had hoped, in spite of our early efforts. So instead of a
May 1990 bid opening date, the current schedule is for September 4
1990. I'll work to try to keep this on schedule or accelerated,
but there is no chance that we could have anything opened for
bid on a September of '89 time frame.
Several times we've discussed additional funding for this project
to make up for cost escalations that have occurred during the
project development. The current cost estimate at $7.49 million
is double the original cost. Estimated shortfall is $3.7 million.
Our current committed funding for this project totals
County committed MSTIP of revenues are $1,770,000, Tri-Met is
committed with $100,000. As I told you in our meeting, I intend
to work towards an idea of sharing the increased cost with the
county. My current target is to increase our participation to
$3.8 million with the understanding that the county would increase
their share to $3.6 million and Tri-Met would continue their
share of $100,000. It is also understood that the county will
take over maintenance of some portion of the highway.
I need to review our funding capacity for this project in order
to commit the additional $1.9 million. You will need to work
out assurances that the MSTIP funds can be committed to this
project and together we need to resolve the details of maintenance
responsibilities.
(over)
734-1850 (1.87)
INN
Bruce Warner
Page 2
June 15, 1989
I think all these things can be worked out, just as long as we
both remain positive about the prospects. I need your support
for the OTC approvals, as well.
Donald Adams, P.E.
Region Engineer
DRA/km/cp
'-JUL 14 '89 15:48 WASHINGTON COUNTY 503 648 ee95
P. 2
WASHINGTON
squa COUNTY, July 14, 1989
C
OREGON'
Pat Reilly, city Manager
City of Tigard
13126 S.W. Hall Blvd.
Tigard. Oregon 97223
Dear Pat,
This letter is in response to your call yesterday concerning the status of
Scholls Ferry Road as part of MSTIP I. First let me assure you that Scholls
Ferry Road is a very important project to Washington County and we are doing
everything we can to pressure the State into accelerating this project as soon
as possible. I believe you have a copy of the June 15th letter from Don
Adams,.which indicates that right-of-way acquisition has not been accelerated
as much as he had hoped and that they are now looking at a bid opening for
September 1990.
Don also indicated in his letter that the State will be looking at increasing
their participation in the Scholls Ferry Project with the understanding that
the County will increase their share to $3.6 M along with an increase of
$100,000 from Tri Met.
It is my intention to talk to the City of Beaverton and recommend to the
Coordinating Committee that we transfer MSTIP money currently held for the
Farmington Road Project to Scholls Ferry Road to make that project whole from
the standpoint of Washington County participation. In-order to accomplish
this I will need to have assurances that the money from Farmington Road will
be returned from some other source. At this time I believe that a commitment
of future Federal Aid Urban money can accomplish this. It will be necessary
to receive concurrence from the Coordinating Committee on this approach.
It is my intention to bring this forward to the Coordinating Committee next
month in hopes that this can be resolved prior to October of this year'.
Also I do not support the approach of phasing the project.in an effort to
reduce costs at this time. Scholls Ferry needs to be completed as one project
from Fanno Creek to Murray Blvd. Both Beaverton and Tigard have done an
excellent job in assisting in making this project happen by conditioning for
ROW dedication as part of development within your cities.
If you have any questions concerning or need any additional information
concerning the Department's position on Scholls Ferry Road, please let me know.
Sincerely,
a~
Bruce'A. Warner, P.E.
Director
PAIR/br Department of Land Use And Transportation, Administration
150 North First Avenue Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Phone! 603/848.87
WorKsbop M e~e+; n9
-711-71 get - ll'~6&Aa Gtl
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BUDGET
1989/1990
MMOM
TUALATIN VALLEY
ECONOMIC 1)1?VEL013MI?N"I' CORPORATION
M I S S I O N S T A T E M E N T
The mission of the Tualatin Valley Economic Development
Corporation is to foster a positive economic climate and
facilitate the development of job opportunities in the
Tualatin Valley.
To achieve this mission, TVEDC will:
Aff- Coordinate public and private strategies, programs and
efforts affecting valley-wide economic development.
Coordinate the development and implementation of
strategic valley-wide action plans on selected issues
critical to economic growth.
* Provide private sector leadership and advocacy on major
valley-wide economic development issues.
April 1989
C
10 170 S.W. Nimbus Avenue • Suite H-I • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • (503) 620-1142
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PROPOSED BUDGET
JULY 1, 1989 - JUNE 30, 1990
PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS
TOTAL REGIONAL ISSUES MEMBER/PUBLIC INFORMATION ADVOCACY ADMINISTRATION
PLANNING MANAGEMENT EDUCATION SERVICES
INCOME
DUES $62,000.00 $62,000.00
GRANTS-PRIVATE -
GRANTS-PUBLIC $38,567.00 $38,567.00
DEDICATED FUNDS $62,000.00 $50,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,000.00
CONTRACTS $36,250.00 $6,250.00 $30,000.00
IN-KIND $32,500.00 $6,500.00 $26,000.00
INTEREST $100.00 $100.00
MISCELLANEOUS $20,500.00 $20,000.00 $500.00
SUBTOTAL $251,917.00 $56,250.00 $33,500.00 $30,000.00 $132,167.00
ALLOCATED SUPPORT $12,167.00 $18,572.00 $17,857.00 $6,156.00 $5,976.00 ($60,728.00)
TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET $251,917.00 $12,167.00 $74,822.00 $51,357.00 $36,156.00 $5,976.00 $71,439.00
EXPENSES
SALARIES & WAGES $85,628.00 .$8,867.00 $31,172.00 $13,907.00 $11,096.00 $4,146.00 $16,440.00
PAYROLL TAXES & BENEFITS $17,012.00 $1,700.00 $5,950:00 $2,400.00 $2,210.00 $680.00 $4,072.00
CONTRACT SERVICES $56,750.00 $31,500.00 $4,500.00 $15,250.00 $5,500.00
DIRECT PROGRAM COSTS $34,300.00 $450.00 $1,000.00 $21,350.00 $4,500.00 $7,000.00
POSTAGE $6,900.00 $150.00 $1,850.00 $2,100.00 $750.00 $200.00 $1,850.00
PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS $9,200.00 $100.00 $1,150.00 $5,200.00 $1,050.00 $200.00 $1,500.00
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT $3,550.00 $400.00 $1,200.00 $900.00 $300.00 $250.00 $500.00
MISCELLANEOUS/CONTINGENCY $5,327.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $1,327.00
OFFICE EXPENSES $8,000.00 $8,000.00
RENT $13,500.00 $13,500.00
EQUIPMENT RENTAL & MAINT. $7,000.00 $7,000.00
INSURANCE $300.00 $300.00
CONFERENCE & TRAINING $250.00 $250.00
UTILITIES & PHONE $4,200.00 $4,200.00
PROFESSIONAL FEES
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL $251,917.00 $12,167.00 $74,822.00 $51,357.00 $36,156.00 $5,976.00 $71,439.00
CITY/COUNTY GRANTS TO TVEDC
1989/90
Washington County $25,000
Beaverton 5,979
Hillsboro 5,179
Sherw3od 480
Tualatin 1,929
Total $38,567
Cities still considering contributions (not budgeted):
Cornelius $ 846
Forest Grove 1,980
King City 332
Tigard 3,850
Total $ 7,008
t
I
(
f
G
I
V
f
sF}
I
(
r
f
ttt
i
'r
1989/90 BUDGETS
FOR
INDIVIDUAL PROGRAMS
i
E
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
t
BUDGET NOTES
REGIONAL PLANNING
r
TVEDC will assist in the development of the Washington
County public/private economic development strategy and will
help coordinate its implementation.
TVEDC will support the efforts of PDC and OEDD to facilitate
business recruitment and retention in the Tualatin Valley.
t
INCOME
{
General_-- During 1989/90 we do not anticipate any direct
income to this program through grants, contracts or
dedicated funds. As a result funding for the program is
budgeted through fund allocations from the city/county
grants.
EXPENSES OVERVIEW
Percent of Budget = 57
Percent of Program Effort = 107 r'.
Allocation of Staff Time: Tobias = 127
Weber = 147
Elligsen 27
PROGRAM EXPENSES
General The majority of the costs attributable to this
program as budgeted for staff salaries.
County Economic Development Task Force During this
budget cycle, we anticipate that our activity level in this
program element will remain about the same as 1988/89 with
specific tasks including the chairmanship of and staff '
support to the Resources Committee, vice chairmanship of the
Economy Committee and other advisory assignments. In
addition, board members will continue to serve in various
capacities on other Task Force Committees. t.
Other Program Elements In 1989/90 we will continue to
participate in regional strategic planning efforts
including: Marketing Portland Coordinating Council (PDC)
Urban Growth Boundary Management Study Task
Force (Metro)
Surface Water Management Task Force (Unified
Sewerage Agency)
Water Management Committee of Washington
County
The major budget requirement for these program elements is
reflected in personnel costs.
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PROPOSED BUDGET
JULY 1, 1989 - JUNE 30, 1990
REGIONAL PLANNING
i
COUNTY OTHER TOTAL
TASK FORCE
INCOME
DUES -
GRANTS-PRIVATE -
GRANTS-PUBLIC
DEDICATED FUNDS
CONTRACTS '
IN-KIND
INTEREST -
MISCELLANEOUS
SUBTOTAL
ALLOCATED SUPPORT $3,036.00 $9,131.00 $12,167.00
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET $3,036.00 $9,131.00 $12,167.00
r
C EXPENSES
SALARIES & WAGES $2,128.00 $6,739.00 $8,867.00 F<
PAYROLL TAXES & BENEFITS $408.00 $1,292.00 $1,700.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
DIRECT PROGRAM COSTS $250.00 $200.00 $450.00
POSTAGE $50.00 $100.00 $150.00
PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS $100.00 $100.00
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT $200.00 $200.00 $400.00
MISCELLANEOUS/CONTINGENCY $500.00 $500.00
OFFICE EXPENSES
RENT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL & MAINT. c
INSURANCE
CONFERENCE & TRAINING i
UTILITIES & PHONE
PROFESSIONAL FEES
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL $3,036.00 $9,131.00 $12,167.00
1
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BUDGET NOTES
ISSUES MANAGEMENT
TVEDC will coordinate the development and implementation of
strategic valley-wide action plans on issues like:
The Western Beltway a major solution to
impending Washington County gridlock;
The Tualatin River the source of potential
business and development moratorium.
INCOME
General During 1989/90 we plan to conduct a major
funding campaign to generate income for a major public
information campaign on the importance of the Western
Beltway to the economic future of the Tualatin Valley. We
do not anticipate any additional direct income to this
program through grants, contracts or dedicated funds. As a
result, funding for the management of water quality and
other issues is budgeted through fund allocations from the
city/county grants and membership dues.
Western Beltway We will begin a targeted fund raising
campaign in July 1989 with an anticipated income of $50,000
to cover the expenses anticipated in a major public
information program on the importance of the Western
Beltway. In addition, $6,250 in contracted fees is expected
from the Beltway Coalition (as agreed on by all parties) to
cover the legal costs incurred in filing the two LUBA briefs
in April and June 1989.
EXPENSES OVERVIEW
Percent of Budget = 30%
Percent of Program Effort = 35%
Allocation of Staff Time: Tobias = 45%
Weber = 20%
Elligsen = 30%
PROGRAM EXPENSES
General Although the majority of the budgeted expenses
in this program will be incu-red by a pro-active campaign in
support of the beltway, we also anticipate staff time to be
spent on water quality, land use and other transportation
issues. Education and school financing may also surface as
critical issues for the corporation during 1989/90.
Western Beltway Two major expenditures are anticipated
in this program element. A significant amount of staff time
is budgeted (salary and benefits = $21,000) and money is
allocated to contract for services with Northwest Strategies
(or someone) to assist with the research and writing for the
public information campaign ($31,500).
Water Quality and Other Issues The major expense in
these program elements is expected to be staffing.
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PROPOSED BUDGET
JULY 1, 1989 - JUNE 30, 1990
ISSUES MANAGEMENT
WESTERN WATER OTHER TOTAL
BELTWAY QUALITY
INCOME
DUES -
GRANTS-PRIVATE " -
GRANTS-PUBLIC
DEDICATED FUNDS $50,000.00 $50,000.00
CONTRACTS $6,250.00 $6,250.00
IN-KIND
INTEREST "
MISCELLANEOUS
SUBTOTAL $56,250.00 $56,250.00
ALLOCATED SUPPORT $3,497.00 $15,075.00 $18,572.00
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET $56,250.00 $3,497.00 $15,075.00 $74,822.00
i
EXPENSES
SALARIES & WAGES $17,768.00 $2,181.00 $11,223.00 $31,172.00
PAYROLL TAXES & BENEFITS $3,232.00 $416.00 $2,302.00 $5,950.00
CONTRACT SERVICES $31,500.00 $31,500.00
DIRECT PROGRAM COSTS $500.00 $250.00 $250.00 $1,000.00
POSTAGE $1,000.00 $250.00 $600.00 $1,850.00
PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS $750.00 $200.00 $200.00 $1,150.00
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT $500.00 $200.00 $500.00 $1,200.00
MISCELLANEOUS/CONTINGENCY $1,000.00 $1,000.00
OFFICE EXPENSES
RENT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL & MAINT.
INSURANCE
CONFERENCE & TRAINING
UTILITIES & PHONE
PROFESSIONAL FEES
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL $56,250.00 $3,497.00 $15,075.00 $74,822.00
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BUDGET NOTES
MEMBER/PUBLIC EDUCATION rll-
TVEDC will develop and implement business and public
education/information programs to increase awareness and
understanding of critical issues affecting economic development in
the Tualatin Valley through business forums, white papers, fact
sheets, and the corporation's quarterly newsletter. In addition,
opportunities for networking will occur at membership meetings and
the corporation's annual fundraiser - the summer gala.
INCOME
General We anticipate a continuation of member/public support
for the newsletter and quarterly meetings, but anticipate
underwriting all Member/Public Education programs except the summer
gala.
Newsletter Revenue for the newsletter was down in 1988/89,
therefore we have budgeted conservatively for the coming fiscal
year. The remainder of the funding is budgeted with allocated
support from membership dues.
Gala We anticipate $6,000 in donated services (in-kind) and
$20,000 in revenue for this year's event.
Tualatin Valley Dialogue No revenue is anticipated for this
project and funds are budgeted through allocated support form the
city/county grants.
Other Again, based on 1988/89 revenues, we have budgeted
conservatively for sponsor support for the quarterly meetings.
Additional funding will be allocated from membership dues.
EXPENSES OVERVIEW
Percent of Budget = 212
Percent of Program Effort 209
Allocation of Staff Time: Tobias = 159
Weber 109
Elligsen = 359
PROGRAM EXPENSES
General The major expenses in this program are the quarterly
meetings and the summer gala. Other costs are incurred in staffing
these events and the Membership/ Programs Committee.
Newsletter Savings are expected in production this fiscal year.
We have changed printers and should see a significant reduction in
printing costs. We will be going to bulk mailings with the
September issue.
Gala The budget reflects $3,000 in contract services. $2,000
of this is due to Brook Walters for the 1989 Gala and $1,000 is
budgeted for the initial contract costs for the 1990 Gala. Of the
$13,000 budgeted for direct program costs, $6,000 offsets the in-
kind contributions and $7,000 is anticipated for the rental
charges, band, etc.
Tualatin Valley Dialogue This is a new program element (4/89)
and expenses are primarily for staff time and mailing.
Other Programs The primary program elements included in this
category are the quarterly meetings, the Mayors Business Roundtable
and the Membership/Programs Committee. The "direct program costs"
budget item ($8,000) reflects the costs to the corporation for
holding four membership meetings (Quarterly & Annual Meetings)
annually.
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PROPOSED BUDGET
JULY 1, 1989 - JUNE 30, 1990
MEMBER,/PUBLIC EDUCATION
NEWSLETTER GALA DIALOGUE OTHER TOTAL
INCOME
DUES
GRANTS-PRIVATE -
GRANTS-PUBLIC
DEDICATED FUNDS $1,000.00 $6,000.00 $7,000.00
CONTRACTS
IN-KIND $6,000.00 $500.00 $6,500.00
INTEREST
MISCELLANEOUS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
SUBTOTAL $1,000.00 $26,000.00 $6,500.00 $33,500.00
ALLOCATED SUPPORT $5,734.00 ($4,770.00) $2,580.00 $14,313.00 $17,857.00
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET $6,734.00 $21,230.00 $2,580.00 $20,813.00 $51,357.00
EXPENSES
SALARIES & WAGES $29920.00 $1,390.00 $1,390.00 $8,207.00 $13,07.00
PAYROLL TAXES & BENEFITS $714.00 $340.00 $340.00 $1,006.00 $2.4400.00
CONTRACT SERVICES $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $500.00 $4,500.00
DIRECT PROGRAM COSTS $100.00 $13,000.00 $250.00 $8,000.00 $21,350.00
POSTAGE $500.00 $300.00 $300.00 $1,000.00 $2.100.00
PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS $19500.00 $3,000.00 $100.00 $600.00 $5,200.00
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT $200.00 $200.00 $50000 $900.00
MISCELLANEOUS/CONTINGENCY $1,000..00 $1,000.00
OFFICE EXPENSES
RENT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL & MAINT.
INSURANCE
CONFERENCE & TRAINING
UTILITIES & PHONE
PROFESSIONAL FEES
DEPRECIATION -
INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL $6,734.00 $21,230.00 $2,580.00 $20,813.00 $51,357.00
P
I
,r-
t
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BUDGET NOTES
INFORMATION SERVICES
TVEDC will serve as a general (central) source of
information and referral on economic development issues,
contacts, data, etc. in cooperation with governments and
other associations in the Tualatin Valley.
INCOME
General In 1989/90 we anticipate funding for the
Agriculture Study commissioned by the Hillsboro Chamber of
Commerce. All other funding for this program is expected to
come from allocated support from the city/county grants and
membership dues.
Agriculture Economic Impact Study To date, this study
has been funded for the preliminary feasibility stage only
($5,500), but the Chamber has indicated that funding for the
entire project will be available.
EXPENSES OVERVIEW
Percent of Budget 15%
Percent of Program Effort = 13%
Allocation of Staff Time: Tobias = 2%
Weber = 3~~
Elligsen 2%
PROGRAM EXPENSES
i
General The majority of the expenditures in this program j
are budgeted for personnel and contract services for the Ag
Study. In addition, direct program costs are expected to be
high for the study.
Agriculture Economic Impact Study A significant portion
of the staff time has been budgeted for this study. In
addition, we have contracted with an independent j
research/writer to work on the study ($15,000). Direct
program costs for the study will include statistical
analysis, surveys and computer data runs ($4,000).
Other This budget item reflects staff time filling
requests from constituents and site selectors, as well as
the costs of assembling information, updating our files, and
mailings. I
i
i
t
I : ,
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PROPOSED BUDGET
JULY 1, 1989 - JUNE 30, 1990
INFORMATION SERVICES
STUDIES/ OTHER TOTAL
PROJECTS
INCOME
DUES -
GRANTS-PRIVATE -
GRANTS-PUBLIC
DEDICATED FUNDS
CONTRACTS $30,000.00 $30,000.00
IN-KIND
INTEREST
MISCELLANEOUS
SUBTOTAL $30,000.00 $30,000.00
ALLOCATED SUPPORT $6,156.00 $6,156.00
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET $30,000.00 $6,156.00 $36,156.00
( EXPENSES
SALARIES & WAGES $7,212.00 $3,884.00 $11,096.00
PAYROLL TAXES & BENEFITS $1,338.00 $872.00 $2,210.00
CONTRACT SERVICES $15,000.00 $250.00 $15,250.00
DIRECT PROGRAM COSTS $4,000.00 $500.00 $4,500.00
POSTAGE $500.00 $250.00 $750.00
PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS $750.00 $300.00 $1,050.00
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT $200.00 $100.00 $300.00
MISCELLANEOUS/CONTINGENCY $1,000.00 $1,000.00
OFFICE EXPENSES
RENT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL & MAINT.
INSURANCE
CONFERENCE & TRAINING
UTILITIES & PHONE
PROFESSIONAL FEES
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL $30,000.00 $6,156.00 $36,156.00
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BUDGET NOTES
ADVOCACY
TVEDC will advocate legislative and policy support for
business community positions on key issues that affect the
business climate in the Tualatin Valley, including land use,
transportation and water quality.
INCOME
General During 1989/90 we do not anticipate any direct
income to this program through grants, contracts or
dedicated funds. As a result funding for the program is
budgeted through fund allocations from membership dues. No
public money is allocated to this budget.
EXPENSES OVERVIEW
Percent of Budget = 2%
Percent of Program Effort 4%
Allocation of Staff Time: Tobias = 6%
Weber = 6%
Elligsen 1%
PROGRAM EXPENSES
General Expenditures in this program are expected to be
for personnel.
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PROPOSED BUDGET
JULY 1, 1989 - JUNE 30, 1990
ADVOCACY
TOTAL
INCOME
DUES -
GRANTS-PRIVATE -
GRANTS-PUBLIC
DEDICATED FUNDS
CONTRACTS
IN-KIND
INTEREST
MISCELLANEOUS
SUBTOTAL
ALLOCATED SUPPORT $5,976.00
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET $5,976.00
EXPENSES
SALARIES & WAGES $4,146.00
PAYROLL TAXES & BENEFITS $680.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
DIRECT PROGRAM COSTS
POSTAGE $200.00
PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS $200.00
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT $250.00
MISCELLANEOUS/CONTINGENCY $500.00
OFFICE EXPENSES
RENT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL & MAINT.
INSURANCE
CONFERENCE & TRAINING
UTILITIES & PHONE
PROFESSIONAL FEES
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL $5,976.00
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BUDGET NOTES
ADMINISTRATION
TVEDC will professionally operate an effective and efficient
organization that successfully fulfills the mission and
objectives of the corporation.
INCOME
General Funding for the corporation's administration
comes primarily from membership dues.
Membership The 1989/90 budget anticipates $42,000 from
membership renewals and $20,000 from new members. Of the
total expected receipts, $50,799 is allocated to program
costs in other TVEDC programs, including $40,000 for
administrative costs. $5,000 in dedicated funds are
budgeted in anticipation of corporate sponsorship for a new
TVEDC information portfolio that will be used for member
recruitment and information packets.
Board In-kind contributions for Board expenses, as well
as for the Cornell Oaks Conference Room is reported here
($1,500). Miscellaneous contributions from the Board to
cover meeting expenses appears under miscellaneous.
Other The city/county grant money is budgeted under
Grant-Public. This income has been allocated to other
programs in the budget. In-kind contributions include
$13,500 rent and $6,000 for office furniture.
EXPENSES OVERVIEW
Percent of Budget = 27%
Percent of Program Effort 18%
Allocation of Staff Time: Tobias = 10%
Weber = 15%
Elligsen = 30%
PROGRAM EXPENSES
General Expenses in this program are basically self-
explanatory.
Board The primary cost to this program element is staff
time with printing and mailing costs adding to costs.
Membership Direct program costs reflected in the budget
include developing and producing the TVEDC Information
Portfolio ($5,000). "Contract services" is budgeted in this
program element to fund a membership recruiter on a 25%
commission basis and anticipates 51 new members (4/$100,
17/$250, 30/$500).
Committees The costs for this program element cover
staffing the Finance and Executive Committees.
Other Costs to this program element include staff for
office management, budget, etc. and general office
expenditures for a..l programs.
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PROPOSED BUDGET
JULY 1, 1989 - JUNE 30, 1990
ADMINISTRATION
BOARD MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEES OTHER TOTAL
INCOME
DUES $62,000.00 $62,000.00
GRANTS-PRIVATE
GRANTS-PUBLIC $38,567.00 $38,567.00
DEDICATED FUNDS $5,000.00 $5,000.00
CONTRACTS
IN-KIND $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $22,500.00 $26,000.00
INTEREST $100.00 $100.00
MISCELLANEOUS $500.00 $500.00
SUBTOTAL $2,000.00 $68,000.00 $1,000.00 $61,167.00 $132,167.00
ALLOCATED SUPPORT $4,522.00 ($51,799.00) $1,431.00 ($14,882.00) ($60,728.00)
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET $6,522.00 $16,201.00 $2,431.00 $46,285.00 $71,439.00
EXPENSES
SALARIES & WAGES $3,804.00 $3,425.00 $1,394.00 $7,817.00 $16,440.00
PAYROLL TAXES & BENEFITS $918.00 $826.00 $337.00 $1,991.00 $4,072.00
CONTRACT SERVICES $5,000.00 $500.00 $5,500.00
DIRECT PROGRAM COSTS $500.00 $6,000.00 $250.00 $250.00 $7,000.00
POSTAGE $750.00 $350.00 $250.00 $500.00 $1,850.00
PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS $400.00 $500.00 $100.00 $500.00 $1,500.00
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT $150.00 $100.00 $100.00 $150.00 $500.00
MISCELLANEOUS/CONTINGENCY $1,327.00 $1,327.00
OFFICE EXPENSES $8,000.00 $8,000.00
RENT $13,500.00 $13,500.00
EQUIPMENT RENTAL & MAINT. $7,000.00 $7,000.00
INSURANCE $300.00 $300.00
CONFERENCE & TRAINING $250.00 $250.00
UTILITIES & PHONE $4,200.00 $4,200.00
PROFESSIONAL FEES
DEPRECIATION
INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL $6,522.00 $16,201.00 $2,431.00 $46,285.00 $71,439.00
i
MIN
CORPORATION
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC UtNELOPWSr
1 PLAN
A C T I O N PERCENT
1989-1990
OF 'EFFORT
CONIFONENI'S
ACTION 10%
PROGRAM BLOT - Washington County Eco.
TVEDDC will assist in the devel- Deve1• Task Force
' Regional Planning opment of the Washington County
y public/private economic devel- - Community Committee
ment strategy and will coordinate _ Resources Committee
its implementation. - Economy Committee
TVEDC will support the efforts of - PDC Marketing Coordinating
PDC and OEDD to facilitate Council
business -recruitment
d retention ^ Metro Urban Growth $Oandxy
' in the Tua
Management Study
35a
-
- TVEDC will coordinate the devel- Western Beltway Coalition
Task Force
Issues Management opment and implementation of _ Tualatin River
strategic valley-wide action Management
- Surface Water plans on: Study
The Western Beltway: a major
ending - Interim New Development
solution to impending Standards Coalition
Washington County g
the - Land Use = General
- The Tualatin River:
source of potential business ortation = General
and development moratorium. - Transp
pERCaN
OF EFFOP:~
S 2~0
COMA
Valley Dialo`e
_ Tualatin
~ ANON
1mplement _ Flay°r's ROU,dtable
2 ~ develop and meetings
TVE~ w~1 ~d public education ness Wmbersh1p
Y~ business increase aware cal _ Quarterly
mbar/ public pro erstanaing of o%~ 1level" - Quarterly Newsletter
Educa
gidues affecting latin ValleY•
iss the Tua
°pment nr1c0_sponsor busu1eSs
_ Spo
forums anon to
r pr de info Qup and media
interested g e ter to
rterly
Qua jwms reSted others . -ate
members and issues to
apers on ke and Policy l30
011 P leaders anp ueSts
O'Pillio"
rs _ Regional Info ation Req
mak
Impact Studies
e as a general on _ Economic Industry Labor
_ TVC1 will serve of inf°z-coati tropics
(ceutrl' sou on ecOnOmiG data - stu pure
Study
Services of Agricu
contacts, Impact t
Infortlon and referral th Rovevil- un Y
nt issues, - Economis ton Co
d associations 4%
opme in cooperation
etc. other
e
s atin Vail Y
the `tea _ Land Ose Issues
ate .5lative
ess _ Transportation Issues
Issues
_ TVEx wi11 advo ort for busan es lity
and Policy ospp ions on ke clima issu te _ `Vater Qua d
Advocacy coo Y p the busless lations, fund rals~ng
that of latin Val Y re
in the Tua fitment, membership recto
time is Spent on
corporation s clcn~ent•
this pi°g ram
The balance onfist ative a a plied to
Venerai :a&iM will be p
i
~t f
TUALATIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1
1988
i
Program Highlights
r
ISSUES MANAGEMENT
I
* Western Beltway (ByPass) - TVEDC continued
s
to support the construction of the highway through
active participation in public forums and r
representation on regional committees monitoring !
the progress of the project. !
Committee: Transportation
Westside Light Rail - TVEDC has monitored the
development of the light rail proposal and has
participated in discussions of possible alignments
with regional leaders in both the public and
private sectors. In late 1988 TVEDC convened an
informal, issues-directed meeting between key i
Washington County businesses, and government
representatives and Tri-Met staff to assess the
current status of the project.
Committee: Transportation
t.
Washington County Mass Transit Planning - A
special ad hoc committee, working in concert with
Tri-Met staff, has been studying the intra-county
mass transit system and will propose ways in which E
current service delivery can be improved or ?
4
enhanced. ~
Committee: Ad Hoc Committee on Washington County
Mass Transit
* Tualatin River Water Quality Management - TVEDC
joined other regional economic development
organizations in supporting the Washington
County/United Sewerage Agency's request for
latitude in meeting the EQC compliance deadline.
The Corporation plans to play a leadership role in
regional efforts to develop pro-active strategies
to protect business and industry interests as this
issue develops.
Committee: Tualatin River Basin Task Force
* Extended ®rea Telephone Service TVEDC held
several forums to inform members on the issues
surrounding the EAS controversy. In addition, the
Corporation provided testimony before the Public
r Utility Commission asking for further study of the
revised PUC staff recommendations prior to major
changes in the service delivery system and rate
structure.
Committee: Issues Research
* Metropolitan Area Communications Commission Public
Access Telecasts - At the request of the
Washington County Public Affairs Forum, TVEDC
testified before the MACC Board of Directors
supporting continued MACC staffing for the
broadcasts of the important regional public
affairs forum.
Committee: Issues Research
* Higher Education - Meeting the educational and
training needs of business and industry has been
identified as an important issue for the
Corporation in 1988/89.
Committee: Issues Research
1988 ISSUES MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS FOR THE MEMBERSHIP
* "Role of Higher Education in Economic Development"
Quarterly Meeting program at OGC
* "Moving Toward the Year 2000", The Honorable
AuCoin
Quarterly Meeting program at Kruse Woods
* Breakfasts Forums on Extended Area Services
Regional Economic Meeting on Transportation
* Mayors' Business Roundtable on Mass Transit and
Westside Light Rail
DATA RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT
Washington County Interdependency Study - This
research project was designed to document the
existing interdependence linking Washington
County's businesses and businesses throughout
Oregon and to identify opportunities for
increased intra-state business. The study results
suggest an economic development strategy for
Washington County that will help build Oregon's
economy from within by maximizing job
opportunities in existing businesses.
* Washington County Labor Study - TVEDC, in
cooperation with the Sunset Corridor Association
and the Oregon Department of Economic Development,
is developing a profile of the local labor force
and the labor requirements of the electronics
industry. The study will aid in the
identification of conditions that influence the
supply of workers to the electronics industry and
address the long-term issues related to labor
availability.
* Regional Econometric Model - The University of
Portland in conjunction with TVEDC, is testing an
economic model to forecast the direction of key
regional economic indicators. The economic
forecasts generated by the model would enable the
metropolitan region to make more efficient
planning and investment decisions.
REGIONAL STRATEGIC PLANNING
Washington County Cities/County Partnerships - The
cities and County signed formal agreements
recognizing TVEDC as the private sector
coordinator for economic development in Washington
County. The city and county managers are working
with TVEDC to develop an economic development work
plan for the region that will provide for a pro-
active, unified approach to business growth and
retention in the 1990's.
Washington County Economic Development Task Force
- TVEDC members hold the vice-chairmanship of the
Steering Committee, the chairmanship of the
Resources Committee, vice-chairmanship of the
Economy Committee and seats on each of the
remaining committees working to develop a
coordinated strategic plan for economic
development in Washington County.
* Portland Development Commission Marketing Portland
Task Force - TVEDC is playing an active role on a
regional task force convened by PDC to develop a
marketing strategy for the metropolitan area. The
task force anticipates playing a key part in the
implementation of the strategy.
loll
TUALATIN VALLEY
ECONOMIC I)EVELOPMI:N'I' C(.)RPOIW'ION
SUMMARY OF RECENT EVENTS
Western Beltway
April 1989
x 3 CPO 10 meeting - STOP presentation
x + 11 Greater Hillsboro Leadership Forum - Seminar
+ 13 Coalition Steering Comm. - Strategy Session
x + 19 Portland City Club/Study Committee - Panel
x 25 STOP public meeting - Reedville
x + 26 Portland City Club/Study Committee - Panel
x + 27 TVEDC Quarterly Meeting - Pro and Con Presentation
+ Clackamas Cty public officials - Presentation on
Beltway
unknown KGW-TV Editorial - Not supportive
May 1989
+ 2 Mult Cty Brd of Commissioners staff - Presentation on
Beltway
6 LUBA decision in 1000 Friends v Washington Cty and Metro
+ 9 Tualatin Chamber of Commerce - Presentation
+ 12 Coalition Steering Committee - Strategy session
x + 15 Oregon Transportation Commission - Worksession on Beltway
x 16 STOP public meeting - Aloha
24 Gary Conkling response to KGW-TV Editorial
x 25 CPO-10 Western Bypass - Committee organized
+ 30 Tualatin Valley Dialogue - Panel Discussion Q & A
June 1989
+ 1 Cedar Hills Kiwanis - Presentation
Oregonian "Soundoff" article - Reader response requested
x + 1-5 Coalition call down to respond to Soundoff question
x + 5 Washington Cty legislative delegation forum - Panel
x 6 CPO 8 meeting - STOP presentation
Asterisk and plus denote attendance, participation, or sponsorship
of event by corresponding organization
+ TVEDC/Beltway Coalition
x STOP/1000 Friends of Oregon
10170 S.W. Nimbus Avenue • Suite H-2 • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • (503) 620-1142
TUALATIN VALLEY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPPYjEI. T CGRUORJU11ION
INTERVENORS ON THE SIDE OF METRO
STOP v METRO
June 1, 1989
City of Beaverton City of Forest Grove
City of Hillsboro City of King City
City of Lake Oswego City of McMinnville
City of Newberg City of Sheridan
City of Sherwood City of Tigard
City of Tualatin City of Wilsonville
Lincoln County
Yamhill County
Beaverton Area Chamber of Commerce
Forest Grove Chamber of Commerce
Hillsboro Chamber of Commerce
McMinnville Chamber of Commerce
Newberg Chamber of Commerce
Portland Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce
Sherwood Chamber of Commerce
Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce
Tualatin Chamber of Commerce
Wilsonville Chamber of Commerce
I-5 Corridor Association
Forest Grove/Cornelius Economic Development Council
Sunset Corridor Association
Tualatin Valley Economic Development Corporation
McMinnville Industrial Promotions
Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland
10170 S.W. Nimbus Avenue • Suite 1-1-1 • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • (503) 620-1142
'i
TUALATIN VALLEY
ECONOMIC DEVE1.013MI?N'I' COItPORAI'ION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1989
DeMar L. Batchelor Commissioner Bonnie Hays
Schwerin, Bradley, Batchelor Washington County
,risbee & Stockton 150 N. First Avenue
139 NE Lincoln Hillsboro, OR 97124
Hillsboro, OR 97123 648-8676
648-6677
J. David Bennett Richard C. Johnson
Copeland, Landye, Bennett Intel Corporation
& Wolf 5200 NE Elam Young Parkwy
3500 1st Interstate Tower EY1-79
Portland, OR 97201 Hillsboro, OR 97124
224-4100 696-3000
Robert H.Colfelt David Lawrence
U.S. National Bank City of Hillsboro
P.O. Box 460 205 SE Second Avenue
Forest Grove, OR 97116 Hillsboro, OR 97123
359-4402 681-6100
Jan Dickinson Kenneth E. Lewis
Dickinson Consulting Group Kenneth E. Lewis, CPA
6175 SW 112th 9780 SW Shady Lane
Beaverton, OR 97006 Portland, OR 97223
626-3441 639-7400
The Honorable Jerald Edwards Gene Leo
City of Tigard Rose Festival Association
P.O. Box 23397 220 NW 2nd
Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97209
639-4171 227-2681
Dr. Bert Gredvig Nawzad Othman
OGC Science Park OTAK, Inc.
1600 NW Compton Drive #300 17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd.
Beaverton, OR 97006-6905 Lake Oswego, OR 97034
690-1112 241-0356
Dick Porn Bill Seal
Cornell Oaks Corporate Center Barbara Sue Seal Prop.
15455 NW Greenbrier Parkway #201 4103 SW Mercantile #E500
Beaverton, OR 97006 Lake Oswego, OR 97034
645-1919 241-5505
10170 S.W: Nimbus Avenue • Suite H-2 • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • (503) 620.1142
Pamela Ragsdale Pat Simpson
Gilchrist & Associates, Inc. Perkins Coie
815 SW 2nd St., Suite 300 111 SW Fifth, #2500
Portland, OR 97204 Portland, OR 97204
243-1030 295-4400
H. Pat Ritz Jim Standring
Oregon Title Insurance Co. Westland Industries, Inc.
1515 SW 5th 5 Nansen Summit
Portland, OR 97201 Lake Oswego, OR 97034
220-0015 245-9715
Tim Schauermann Greg Van Pelt
Schauermann Insurance Assoc Inc St. Vincent Hospital &
2328 Pacific Ave. Medical Center
Forest Grove, OR 97116 9205 SW Barnes Road
357-7111 Portland, OR 97225
291-2211
Jack Schwab Frank Weigel Jr.
McClure & Schwab Weigel Development Co.
9250 SW Tigard Ave. 4915 SW Griffith #230
Tigard, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97005
639-4108 644-6944
t
RBA DRAFT
S.UBU N
TRAN IT
STUDY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
1 1
1
1 ,
1 ;
1 ,
$80 ,
1
1
1
1 ;
1 1
, i ~ 4 •
1 ,
1 ,
1 ,
1
60 1 '
1
0 1 1
1
j 1
1
m f
1
Lu
CL ;
c~n l '
1 1
0 40 I.
i
, i
1 ,
/
I f
20
i
i
,
1
4
1 f
1
t
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
BOARDING RIDES PER HOUR
Service Planning &TRI-MET
Public Services Division Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon
April 1989 4012 se 17th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97202
SUBURBAN TRANSIT STUDY
April, 1989
TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN
TRANSIT DISTRICT OF OREGON
With Assistance From
METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT
Project Manager
Ross Roberts
Prepared by
CRAIN & ASSOCIATES
JIM CONSULTING
Principal Author
William B. Welch
The preparation of this report has been financed in part through a
grant from the United States Department of Transportation, Urban
Mass Transportation Administration under Section 9 of the Urban
Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended.
A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 Introduction
This report presents the findings of a study of suburban transit
service in Portland. The Tri-County Metropolitan Transit District
of Oregon (Tri-Met) was the lead agency for the study. The study
includes; an analysis of demographic, travel behavior and
attitudinal data; an evaluation of Tri-Met's suburban service; a
review of suburban service methods and recommendations for a
demonstration project. The Metropolitan Service District (Metro)
funded the service methods review component of the study.
tr
~~66 The goals of the project were three:
1. To objectively and impartially evaluate Tri-Met's
effectiveness in providing suburban transit service.
2. To evaluate specific opportunities for impl.-menting
alternative service methods, including contracted small
bus and demand-responsive transit service.
3. To identify the constraints that the Tri-Met labor A4:
contract imposes on implementing contract service.
x:
2
The project also sought to achieve several specific objectives
(listed in Table 1):
Table 1. Suburban Transit Study objectives
1. Identify service deficiencies
2. Describe suburban transit market segments
3. Identify markets to tap and the cost thereof
4. Identify prospective conversions to non-fixed
route service
5. Identify if markets exist for premium fare
express service
6. Assess the effectiveness of Tri-Met's
programs to provide:
a. fixed-route service
- b. non-fixed-route service
c. ridesharing
d. employer-based programs
e. land use/transit coordination
7. Identify opportunities for
a. increased rideshare activities
b. employer-subsidized service and
promotions.
8. Compare Tri-Met suburban transit performance
with that of peer transit agencies
9. Analyze labor implications of suburban
transit service alternatives.
3
e
i
C
C
The service evaluation component of the study, funded by Metro,
identified innovative methods used by other transit systems for
providing suburban transit service, and evaluating how valuable
they would be for Portland. The study was accomplished in two {
steps. Eleven alternative service methods were described in
detail, each was appraised as to its effectiveness in the F
communities where it has been tried, and the appropriateness of
each to Portland was assessed. A sketch plan analysis was then
used to evaluate the effect of alternative service methods on the e
cost and performance of suburban transit service in 1998, assuming
a given level of demand.
2.0 Agency Performance comparison
Tri-Met's suburban service was compared with five peer
systems on the measure of service productivity: Denver RTD,
Dallas DART, Minneapolis MTC, Orange County Transit District, and
Seattle Metro. Tri-Met ranked in the middle of its peers in terms
of suburban service productivity. For suburban radial local
service, Tri-Met's average passenger boardings per revenue hour j
are 191 below Metro's which has the highest average, and 28% above f
DART's which has the lowest. For suburban nonradial service, Tri-
Met's average is 41% below Metro's and 58% above DART's.
3.0 Service Effectiveness in Washington Counter E
Tri-Met's route network in Washington County effectively
combines radial local service with regional trunk lines through
suburban service areas based on the timed-transfer concept. The
timed-transfer system is designed to serve both intra-suburban and f
suburb-to-downtown trips. Several local feeder routes serving €
suburban neighborhoods terminate at a transit center. These.
transit centers are linked to Downtown with high capacity, high:
frequency trunk line service. Schedules for the trunkline and
feeder routes are written so that all buses are at the transit
center at the same time. This allows for short, convenient and r
predictable transfer times. Of the current feeder routes in
Washington County, only the Line 67-Beaverton-Cedar Hills exhibits'
productivities low enough to make it a candidate for contracted s;
service. Further analysis is necessary to determine if peak loads
would allow use of a smaller vehicle.
Home-based work trips, home-based "other" trips, and school'
trips are the largest travel markets in Washington County and
offer the most potential for increasing transit market share,
because of their size.
Tri-Met does an excellent job serving home-based work trips
between Washington County and Downtown Portland, capturing 25% of
all trips. This market share is evidence that Tri-Met can expect
to receive increased patronage in this segment of the market,
provided that Downtown employment continues to increase and that
present policies limiting Downtown parking are maintained.
4
In contrast, Tri-Met carries a very low share of work trips that
occur entirely within Washington County. Only 0.9% of these trips
are made by transit. There would appear to be considerable
potential for tapping the intra-suburban work trip market.
Another major travel market in Washington County is home-
based "other" trips, such as shopping, personal business,
and recreation. Trips made entirely within the county are more
numerous in this category than home-based work trips. However,
transit has an even smaller share of this market. Only 0.6% of
home-based other trips are made by transit, indicating that this
market is also largely untapped.
While transit operates reasonably effectively in Washington
County, route coverage falls short of what is needed to serve the
growing number of suburban office park locations. One-third of the
County's office park employment sites are not accessible by
transit. There are also several residential areas in the
developed area of the County which are not well served by transit.
The gaps in employment and residential coverage call into question
the effectiveness of transit in fully serving the developed
portion of Washington County, and suggest that there is an
opportunity for reaching a larger and broader transit market.
4.0 Program Effectiveness
The effectiveness of four Tri-Met programs were evaluated: the
fixed-route program, the non-fixed-route elderly and disabled
program, ridesharing and employer-based programs, and land
use/transit coordination.
4.1 Fixed-Route Service.
The review of the fixed-route service program focused on planning
policies, standards, and procedures. Tri-Met recently developed a
comprehensive set of service policies and standards. With a few
exceptions the standards are complete and comprehensive. It was
noted that a stronger connection could be drawn between the
District's goals and objectives and the related standards. Also,
an overall assessment of current performance should be included,
and paratransit standards should be considered.
The planning database appears to be sound except for on-time
performance data. No systematic procedure is currently in place
for measuring on-time performance--which is critical to the smooth
functioning of the timed-transfer system.
5
4.2 Non-Fixed Route Service
The non-fixed route (paratransit elderly and handicapped) program
has a good statement of purpose, a set of supporting policies, and
a number of measures of effectiveness for which data are routinely
analyzed. The major obstacle to improving program effectiveness
is management information. Better management infor,;ftion is
needed in three areas: response time, trip billing, and vehicle
maintenance. A new computer dispatching system will help monitor
response times and trip billing. However, in the maintenance area
better monitoring procedures and reporting requirements are
needed, as well as staff resources to prepare the procedures,
oversee the monitoring, and evaluate the reports. A number of
alternatives are being considered to deal with vehicle maintenance
in addition to better management reporting, including a special
maintenance contract and a centralized paratransit maintenance
program.
f'
A 1987 Crain & Associates study proposed that The LIFT consider
real-time scheduling to boost its productivity and serve more
general riders. While this may be an overly ambitious objective
program wide, it could be tried in connection with the Washington'
County Dial-a-Ride demonstration project discussed in Section 4.
Aff"
4.3 Ridesharing and Employer-based Programs
Tri-Met's ridesharing program provides a carpool matching'
service, operates a discounted carpool parking program in t:is City a,
of Portland and has an employer outreach program. These
activities are far more successful in the City than in the suburbs
where parking is plentiful and work trips are short. The
program's ability to make progress in suburban areas is limited by
its staff of only three persons--down from ten persons at its peak
in 1982.
A mission statement and performance targets are lacking for
the Ridesharing Program. Also, the program could benefit from a I.
concerted campaign by the District to promote Tri-Met as not just
a local bus service but as a full-service transportation agency
with the rideshare program as a key feature.
An alternative funding source for the Ridesharing Program
must be found when the present funding source--Interstate Transfer
Funds--is depleted in 1990.
;r
6 `
'i
F
f
S
t
I
f
a
4.3 Land Use/Transit Coordination
The Portland Area is well-known for its comprehensive long-
range planning efforts. In the late 1970s and early 1980s Tri-Met E'
was a leader in the transit and land use coordination arena.
Today, Tri-Met needs to reinforce earlier commitments to make sure f;
that land use planning processes consider the implications of E
future development on transit. ;
The lack of policy direction on what Tri-Met can realistically
achieve in the land use/transit coordination area needs to be E
addressed. Tri-Met needs a positive, proactive policy direction
and adequate resources to successfully implement a land use and
transit program.
What Tri-Met should be doing to improve land use coordination
and transit coordination is treated in a comprehensive manner in
the introduction to the District's excellent 1979 guide, Planning r,
with Transit. While it needs to be updated, including more
emphasis on light rail coordination, it does provide a substantial
foundation to work from. The objectives expounded in the guide
are as relevant today as they were in 1979.
Efforts to improve land use and transit coordination will need to
start with providing public officials in suburban areas the
rationale for considering transit in land use planning efforts.
3
5.0 Suburban Transit Service Methods
Alternative service methods will be most useful in serving:
- areas that are presently unserved with low density
populations or employment levels,
- areas where Tri-Met service is unproductive, t
- special markets where a different type of service is needed
to attract new transit riders. x
5.1 Promising Service Methods
Contracted small buses can best be used on fixed routes where
Tri-Met service productivity is low. Dial-A-Ride can be used in
low density areas where fixed route transit would be too costly to
operate, ad as a supplement to fixed route transit to serve y..
specialized markets.Taxi feeder service is a proven method for
extending the reach of conventional fixed routes into low density
residential pockets of the existing service area.
7
.S`
y~
Contracting with private providers offers the greatest opportunity
for cost saving, irrespective of a change in service type. The
average hourly operating cost of conventional Tri-Met service
could be halved by contracting. However, conventional Tri-Met
service will continue to be the dominant service method in
the suburban area because of its generally high productivity and
cost effectiveness, and its ability to handle peak period
passenger volumes.
5.2 Not Promising Service Methods
Checkpoint Dial-A-Ride and fixed-route deviation service are not
promising because of the variability in pickup times and schedules
associated with them. Subscription bus service is a highly cost
effective way to serve commute trips to major employment
complexes, but does not appear to have immediate promise in
Portland due to generally short commutes and dispersed employment
concentrations.
Express bus service coupled with park-and-ride lots can serve
commute trips to Downtown Portland, but is relatively costly and
depends on more long distance commuting coupled with increased
traffic congestion to attract significant ridership, two factors
that are not present in most parts of the region.
Shuttle service is a promising way to link employment parks with
LRT stations; however, it can be expensive and is best
accomplished with private sector support. Given Tri-Met's funding
source, a payroll tax, additional private sector support for
services, particularly in areas where employers are being taxed
and currently receive no service, may be difficult to obtain.
Commuter ridesharing--vanpools and carpools--is likely to have
limited potential in most suburban areas as long as parking for
solo drivers is freely available, congestion is minor, and commute
distances are shorter than the optimum needed (15-30 miles) to
make it successful.
6.0 Sketch Plan of Alternative Service Methods
A sketch planning exercise was conducted to determine how
alternative service methods would affect suburban transit service
on cost and performance. A ten-year time horizon was used with
1998 transit travel projections being the basis for the modelling
process. Two alternative service methods were compared with
conventional transit: contracted small buses operating on fixed
routes, and contracted Dial-a-Ride.
8
Of the 1998 alternatives analyzed, conventional transit +
contracted small bus service is the least costly to operate. The
three-mode alternative--conventional transit + small bus + Dial-A-
Ride--is the next lowest cost, as shown by the ranking of
alternatives below.
Table 2. Sketch Plan Results
RANK ALTERNATIVE SUBSIDY IN COMPARISON
WITH ALL CONVENTIONAL
LEAST COSTLY 1 Conventional Service - 14.51
+ Small Bus (-$5,071,000)
2 Conventional Service -2.0%
+ Small Bus + (-$702,000)
Dial-A-Ride
3 Conventional service
(Base Case)
MOST COSTLY 4 Conventional + 10.41
+ Dial-A-Ride (+$3,632,000)
Suburban transit patronage is projected to grow by 70% between
1988 and 1998. Tri-Met will need to purchase 92 new coaches by
1998 just to continue to provide conventional service. Only 42
new coaches would be needed if small buses and Dial-A-Ride service
were added. However, 77-103 small buses would also have to be
purchased, as well as a 64-96 Dial-A-Ride vehicles. Capital costs
for the new equipment range from $15,200,000 to $23,600,000.
9
7.0 Labor InRlications of Suburban Transit Service Alternatives
The opportunity to improve service availability and the financial
performance of its suburban transit service by contracting for
service has significant labor implications. A fundamental
subcontracting issue is whether the current labor agreement
includes provisions affecting subcontracting or whether it is
"silent" on the subcontracting issue. Tri-Met's labor agreement,
unfortunately, is vague on this point.
The union allowed Tri-Met management to contract out The LIFT
service without a grievance being filed, which is a strong _
precedent for subcontracting demand-responsive service. If Tri-
Met decides that it wishes to reconfigure suburban service to have
regular route bus service and a modest amount of dial-a-ride
service, it may be possible to contract out the latter service
without making any changes in the current labor agreement. It is
conceivable, although highly unlikely, that a small amount of
large bus fixed-route service could be converted to small bus
service and contracted out without changes in the labor
agreement.
The strategic question facing Tri-Met management in labor
negotiations is whether to press the issue of subcontracting to
the limit, in the hope of gaining an agreement which specifies the
conditions under which subcontracting can occur, and thus allow
4 for a predictable planning situation, or to accept any outcome
which does not specifically restrict management's ability to
subcontract, even at the price of significant ambiguity about what
the future potentials of subcontracting may be. For Tri-Met to
prevail on the subcontracting issue in labor negotiations, much
political will is required, including quite possibly the
willingness to accept a strike over this issue.
8.0 Market Research
The results of the 1987 Attitude and Awareness Survey showed that
Washington County residents use transit somewhat less than
residents of the region as a whole, however their attitudes and
motivations to use transit are quite similar to the rest of the
region.
The Tualatin Valley Economic Development Corporation (TVEDC) Mass
Transit Task Force developed 11 strategies for improving suburban
transit service. Three were selected for testing in a focus group
interview setting: Transit Convenience Center, Shoppers Shuttle,
and Dial-a-Ride.
10
The focus group interviews indicated that Washington County
residents are frustrated by traffic congestion. They feel that
mass transit could have responded better to these problems. They
complain that the bus is too slow and requires too many transfers
to get from one part of the region to another. They would like
less cosmetic changes and more attention to improving basic
service. .
The Transit Convenience center concept was favorably received
by focus groups participants, but they felt it did not address the
basic problem of inadequate service. The Shopper Shuttle concept
was thought to be sound except for the problem of handling
packages. Participants were enthusiastic about the Dial-a-Ride
concept but doubted that it could operate cost effectively.
The TVEDC Marketing Panel made up of professional marketing
executives from several companies, developed a strategic framework
to market transit in Washington County. Among their conclusions:
o People's dissatisfaction with the automobile needs to be
understood to plan a transit system that will work for
Washington County.;
o In our society, time is an extremely valuable resource,
and could be the single most important deterrent to
transit riding.
R' o A "value differential" between auto and transit needs to
be established in the consumer's minds revolving around
time, cost, and perceived convenience.
o Washington County residents have a very strong
attachment to their automobiles, and are not generally
oriented to transit.
o Despite reservations in spending additional taxes to
fund transit, it is considered important for Washington t
County.
o Work trips are the most promising area to promote '
transit.
o Any new transit product must be forcefully and
consistently presented and promoted to the public if it
is to be successful.
11
1
9.0 New Service Op»ortunities `
A substantial number of Washington County trips are made over f.
short distances within subareas of Washington County. Within f
Subarea 5 (Tigard-King City-Tualatin) and within Subarea 3;
(Beaverton) there is a large untapped market for transit trips
of all purposes.
Five areas of the County were identified where improved
transit service is needed to conveniently link residential areas
with employment sites, educational institutions and services.'
These linkages either are not provided by transit routes or are
possible only by indirect routing and transfers between lines. No t"
specific evidence of need for transit service is indicated by our
data, however travel data and demographic and socioeconomic.
factors strongly suggest that a potential market exists.
In the five case areas, work trips are the most likely market
for new transit service, followed by trips for other purposes such
as shopping, recreation, and personal business. Home-to-school
trips are largely served by school district busing programs, and
do not have significant market potential.
10.0 Providina New Service'
z
Demand-responsive transit appears to be a practical way to serve
the five case areas. Demand-responsive transit has the
flexibility to serve low initial levels of demand and to expand as _
demand increases. Demand-responsive transit is also more cost t
effective in terms of total cost, than conventional transit for
serving low demand, low density areas with scattered trip origins
and destinations. Dial-a-Ride and Taxi Feeder Service are two
possible demand-responsive service methods.
Detailed analysis of trip origins and destinations in each of
the case areas reveals that there are a diversity of transit
markets which could justify implementing full-day demand- t
responsive transit service. Work trips would dominate during the F,
peak periods, and could include direct trips to employment sites
or feeder trips to transit centers where connections could be made'
to Portland-based buses. Some school trips would be made on the
shoulders of the peak, particularly by college students whose
travel times may not completely coincide with those of commuters.
Shopping, medical, personal business, and other trips could be
made during the midday. In the mid-afternoon after-school
activity trips would be a potential transit market. In the PM
peak, commute trips would again be the predominant market.
12
11.0 Framework for Suburban Transit Development
The Tri-Met Transit Development Plan (TDP) provides a framework
for the implementation of alternative service methods in the
suburban area. The TDP proposes the phasing in of 10% contract
service (8% fixed-route service, 2% demand-responsive service)
over a five-year period and no net increase in total service
hours.
To implement these plans, Tri-Met proposes route productivity
guidelines to determine when contract service should be
substituted for conventional service. Contracted fixed-route
service would be substituted for conventional transit where
productivity is under 25 boarding passengers per revenue hour, and
paratransit (demand-responsive transit_ would be substituted where
productivity is under 10-15 boarding passengers per revenue hour.
These substitutions would decrease the cost per passenger in
suburban operations by substituting lower cost contract service on
low productivity routes and continuing to operate conventional
transit on high productivity routes.
12.0 Implementation Strategies The Study concluded that Dial-a-Ride is an effective way to
develop new ridership markets in Washington County. Tri-Met could Y
contract with The LIFT operator in Washington County to operate a
demc~+.stration project. This operator has the expertise and
resources to operate a Dial-a-Ride service; Tri-Met has spare
vehicles in The LIFT program. F
The South Beaverton area--one of the five "market potential"
areas analyzed in the study--is proposed for the Dial-a-Ride
demonstration. This area was chosen due to its past history with
Line 87, from which it can be ascertained that if service provides
roughly the same productivity as Line 87, there is adequate demand
to make the dial-a-ride experiment successful. In addition, the
number of unserved trips coupled with the areas small geographical r
area results in a high trip density, which would provide a more
concentrated demand than the other areas with transit potential.
The demonstration would focus primarily on work trip ridership,
including trips to local employment locations and feeder trips to
transit centers for Portland passengers. Service would be
supplied six days a week to test a variety of markets for Dial-a-
Ride service. Fares would range from $1.00 to $1.25 with r'
discounts available for off-peak and frequent riders. Assuming
Tri-Met could contract for service at $21 per vehicle service>
hour, the demonstration would cost $251,000 per year would
generate revenue of $65,530, cost $3.65 per passenger (net cost of
$2.70 after fare credit), and achieve a 26% farebox recovery
ratio.
13
13.0 Conclusions
Conclusions of the study are as follows:
T o Tri-Met's suburban transit service operates effectively
and is comparable to peer transit systems on the measure
of passenger productivity (boarding rides per revenue
hours). There are a significant number of residential
and employment locations that are not well covered or
well linked by transit. This results in a route network
which is not well adapted to serving short, local
suburban trips.
o Tri-Met has a great deal of experience in key program
areas affecting suburban service: fixed-route service,
ridesharing, employer based programs, and transit/land
use coordination. However, greater policy emphasis and
direction combined with more staff resources are needed
to make these programs more effective.
o Three service methods offer cost and effectiveness
advantages over conventional transit:
1. Contracted small buses on fixed routes.
2. Contracted Dial-a-Ride service.
3. Contracted shared-ride taxi feeder service.
Overall, the study concluded that contracting service is
the best way to reduce operating costs. Small buses can
produce savings in routes carrying 15-25 passengers per
revenue hour. Dial-a-Ride can operate more cost
effectively than conventional transit in areas with
productivity below 10-15 passengers per hour.
o The provisions of the current labor agreement are vague
regarding the right of Tri-Met to contract for service
and may be an impediment to implementing new service
methods. Past arbitration cases indicate that
contracted fixed-route service is likely to be grieved
by the Union, Dial-a-Ride service less so. Tri-Met
should seek to clarify the labor provisions.
14
o Market research in Washington County indicates that
residents are open to new ideas for providing transit
service, such as Transit Convenience Centers, Shopper
Shuttles, and Dial-a-Ride. However, innovation must
recognize the reality of the transportation environment
in Washington County, that
- residents have a strong attachment to their cars
and are not generally oriented to transit
- that any new transit product must be forcefully and
consistently presented and promoted to the public
if it is to be successful
- that work trips are the most promising market to
capture
o Five areas of Washington County could be productively
served by demand-responsive transit. These are areas
where the current route network does not provide good
coverage or key linkages, and where the multiplicity of
trip origins and destinations makes Dial-a-Ride or
Feeder Taxi Service appropriate. South Beaverton
affords the best opportunity for demonstrating the
effectiveness of Dial-a-Ride, due to its greater
population density.
o Tri-Met°s Transit Development Plan provides a good
framework for implementing alternative service methods
by specifying paratransit and contract service as
essential elements of the plan, and identifying
performance standards under which alternative methods
should be substituted for conventional transit.
o The best way to test the effectiveness of the Dial-a-
Ride concept in Washington County is to conduct a
demonstration project. The project would cost $251,000
per year and would recover a portion of costs in fare
revenues.
14.0 Recommendations
The following actions are recommended to carry out the
findings of this study:
o Tri-Met should seek to clarify the provisions of the
labor agreement regarding contracting to-establish
guidelines for where and how much contract service can
be operated.
15
o A demonstration project should be conducted in
Washington County to test the effectiveness of demand-
responsive transit to tap new markets. South Beaverton
is recommended as the site for a Dial-a-Ride
demonstration which would cost $250,000 for a year.
o Tri-Met should conduct a marketing campaign to present
itself as a full service transportation agency with the
rideshare program as an important feature. Tri-Met's
Ridesharing Program could be improved by the addition of
a mission statement and performance targets.
o Tri-Met should establish policy in the area of
transit/land use coordination to define what the
agency's role is, what can be accomplished, and what
staff resources are needed to accomplish it.
C
16
Submi t by D, l< pc l t0
• . '7 r~.r~ G}, Gvtwtci(, v~n Z~171~r9
• L Vr s i tars ~.r~da) c
691a- -7
9
.
'`l../ I L
7 _
~ F
S
i
G gA&~ /q-575 5 UJ/ /1nL (ate- 7~'~D c;
, .~1~~ ~ • ,t~~.?~'~-- 1 `f'~ ~ s- S~ --~~w ~ 61-0 ~-t 30 _
i f~e~ e~ l 45~ Sw
~1r/SA2 e~Sh~~or/ ~~lhl u1 /433aSG1~, ~~~oCl~1~_ 3x`293/ F;
r rol I i4-&S 5W-Enno Cr L L-p-
g r~D~ U~ ~ ii°z5S sue, woCr, Lp (v39-/23'G
q y E( - ass ~~,r,o ca ~-P luau --0969
F.r.
/ ~ ~•y s.c~ . cam' ~~:s-~ ~
~ ~ ~L~ .moo. ~~.u.~-~~ --~.:~~----~~Z~----
o _U20_~~~~ Ott
~._(.-l9, ~rinnD__.C.~~ C3.
Iq
c-V• - 5 .mil
-h
\ 4.
I lW F~2G~• C/I ~c~ zsV Sc . ro-,A n c~ C„Q- - Z)2 G
ov,
~~toz.n-~' 8 3 ~i~D ~GJ `~rrr~ o G'~~ •j~i2. -
a~ E u
w► ,1 ' j o S fav4,,,o GA- 0 v^-
M-~ 44
(A, Ct
-77
61., Flzc
l.Z _c~i.~~ Iu~35 S. ~C1- %-ctr►no Cf;. C'~: r9~L~~l
n ,
/ ! i, Uz. iy Zi S S t✓ FYYuyv C~~ c LC, 1 t ~i?~Q 0772-Z4Y
4005 5GI" rp c'4GU(L L'T 1 &/f f-b, O,, . `i 7 2,2- 24
C~~?ZLY
3 r2 /l /y I2S,5 SGT
q7 / L~ ~ StJ 1 101? X172-
_ y . ~1L~L~G~~ :j~/~/~~ /GL ~„/v' ~ ~Gr-•/GG/L~CLi C-• -GL•~G L ~7. y / ~~L'y`~
I
1 igfl7.5 P~.
ILI r\ 6,1 D
1) o
9~ 5~ ~u rv ao CR P(a 3 - ~G
CAW,
Cis q((61 5
'9 341 -
00 00 V/7pt 2~cl
6;7-0
~(SS St.J C'G~~w ~ Ott ~
X405 SW ~~,2 v9~ZZ~ C ~ CG~~l--7P~~
f3
elLA,
Ski
~4 C' ~3as S~ C~ Of-
&3W -
(,zy 9707
4o lo,
14ff t I ~
VS90,w cd (,ems C-1 909~p
r•.n
L '
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: July 17. 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: July 7, 1989
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Daniel PREVIOUS ACTION: None
Annexation ZCA 89-06
k-A PREPARED BY: Keith Liden
DEPT HEAD ITY ADMIN 0 REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
Should the City Council forward to the Portland Metropolitan Areal Local
Government Boundary Commission a request of an annexation of a 40 acre parcel
located at the south end of SW 135th Avenue?
INFORMATION SUMMARY
This annexation request consists of one parcel of 40 acres that is contiguous
to the City of Tigard. This property is located within Tigard's area of
interest. Attached is a resolution to forward the annexation request and an
ordinance to change the zone designation from Washington County R-6 to City of
Tigard R-7 in conformance with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Also
attached is a vicinity map, site map, and staff report.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Adopt the attached resolution and ordinance to forward the annexation to
the Boundary Commission and to assign plan and zone designations to the
property in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Deny the proposal.
FISCAL IMPACT
Since this area is not with Tigard's Active Planning Area, the applicant will
pay the Boundary Commission fee of $820 for annexation of 40 acres.
The current land assessment is $6,400.00. No significant fiscal impact is
expected until development occurs. As development occurs, there will be
attendant demands for services. However, based upon prior cost/benefit studies
of annexation, it is expected that the overall fiscal impact of this developed
parcel will be positive. A more precise analysis requires development details
not available at this time.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adopt the attached resolution and ordinance to forward the annexation to the
Boundary Commission and to assign plan and zone designation to the property in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
dj/ZCA 88-15.KL
s~•MwL'
st.
suMMEF
f ~~E
M~ O 9Q!, c W. N.s.w
b U
14 $
p s.w v,,s a
w
m ; 3
c LN. ►AARY
* ~upr LN. r~
R
I ,s+~pp ~NOt~jdA7RAD
1 - A
a ~~JJ}~ LAVRMON CT. LWPMOPi
z _ LC Pb oP. 33 34
\ l V" v
\ \ ENOE~ MCRKINe w fA 4 3 sT.
N.
\ sG\ ~ KATNEP ~
P~\ S.W. Q W. J
£ _ , a
? CWW O Sw wu- ~ ^ S A N E SY
\ \ w st R! Ef S,N IMNEYa
O M
3 33 N
w. 7C~7 au s K P N
5 q et ve sw Nn DOM z s w s
egroa 3 W. MKOOK
CKS
.W.NeR 1 Sw 8 N
}l in X
f-n
E T w
5 w iV►
/lo rrs
wu.+PiT ST. r
R Sw
~Q
V U
R e.w.
P PTA
Sw
wl
Yw
g ,w E=
Sw.
N
i
f p _ Sw MAPI
' 6
GT
IN
H
1SL A D
Y1AY i
~ YE
sa
sw
i
i
• _ 5
4 3
g 10
TON
5 NtN /
l
E A-hs :K. T
_ Sol .
W
~ a
e i y,
~ w
~ S
a
1" s 4001
.0som
lie
,WORM
-002,00 monowl" CITY h~~ '
T1GAR~ p>~~p ~ ; ~ r 's
N P>~p~~11NG .
EXHISIT A
N p1.ANNINa AREA 1 - ' I -
OUtd~`t'TItdARD UREA , r-- ~ o t - , ~0.
WASHINGTON
1 ~ o
d
1 ~ ~1 CC • j { 1 ~ n
lass
N N Pl.A1JNiNa ARE .
'URSA ARY
SOUND
AREA
AGTIVE PLANNING
AREA OP
__•_°n-•e~~~,tt~^""'~"~~a,-v~..rrns~~'"""n"~A~`*~'~~;.-.rte"'"',,......
'96 ~ rTxprq l.M~ ° ,
w 3
l Y\~_~. L,,R
G; G\ v LAUNAMM"T M AM
y\~ ° ~ ~ ELE~
•L .w. EN _ YOIINIM9 IiL N ON
3 33 € O 33 4
tATwEt 4 3
5 4 w
6t VD T. CON
s.w. ~ sY wars
El
9'Vi~, to - w
` E%TE'NSION
Oll
_
R dE Sw.
W, n
I • 12 11'. NANi
m
1 Ming
kN'PP i f Lf'
e,
~a
s w. WM.OWT ST.
R _25. MA" R ^
t.Y.
s M K,
<
N
'-6 LIL-
R- 45
HINGT
_ ISLAND
Ay
4
I B NVIEw
5«
R-4.5
(POl
5 4
4 3
8 9 9 10
5 M 1Mf.N f .N IN w
R- A
MIN T N t`
- ~ N T
s w. f
y
i
-TI
A 51YT t Hr ! "+t'
~ r
d' r a F~.
~I
sw
T : ='wrdti =
c H:
Jd s ro
a ~
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 89--,)0
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZCA 89-06)
(DANIEL) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has received a request for annexation signed by Edwin Daniel who
owns the subject property (Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on July 17, 1989, to consider the
annexation request and to consider zoning designation for the property; and
WHEREAS, on July 17, 1989, the City Council approved and resolution forwarding the
annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission;
and
WHEREAS, the zoning district designation recommended by the Planning staff as set
forth in Section 1 below is that which conforms to the designation assigned to the
property on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map adopted by the City of Tigard and
those which most closely approximate the Washington County zoning designation as
provided in the Washington County - Tigard Urban Planning Area Agreement.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The recommendation of the Planning staff as set forth below is consistent
with Policy 10.1.2 and 10.1.3 of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Tax Man/Lot Number Current Zoning Proposed Zoning
2S1 4 700 Wa. Co. R-6 Tigard R-7
SECTION 2: The property meets the definition for a developing area as defined in
Chapter 18.138 of the Community Development Code and shall be designated
as such on the development standards area map.
SECTION 3: This ordinance shall become effective upon filing of the annexation final
order with the office of the Secretary of State.
PASSED: By vote of the Council members present after being read
by number and title only, this day of , 1989.
Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder
APPROVED: This day of , 1989.
Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Date
EXHIBIT "A"
WITHIN THE NE 1/4, SE 1/4 SECTION 4 INDEX T2S.RIWV
NINOON
cr. s
SEE MAP
+ " ae= 2S 14AS SE
2S
w
LEGEND 3
o®~ sW N a a
TIGARD CITY LIMITS LINE M
s~ 3
cd AVE.
f g, ~
SEE MAP 3
2S1 4B
W W L
sw w
SEE MAP
SEE MAP h SEE 'MAP 2S 1 4AC
/ F
2S 148C Fq 2S 14BD
T SEE
® 25
Area To Be Annexed
1 i .
1
:.:ot.:-.:-f..t`iaav+:l.•:.yjoc<:¢rc:Y{:2`n,'``<`:•3,4i":r:•,'•::tof`:it'%:gC:C%:'•t'`J.''f+: t-Nf?:•s 200
v[-\, ;:Lfiv }nvS'•. 9fk: v\,;i i~:ii?t fi:---i:---
fir: %}}:..}i•;{:::.:.;yw.r:-: rc•.o.:'i.k:.i?:':G::y~+~'ri:Ya:: r~c,•:; '
`700 a,:r{::`^•:#?'-',:::f..1'{r..idryr}:::::"•r'•;c:r.::•:'•{.ri?f:? ./l.5llt.
::b r: x«:..::.,,.i:{>tr.,. tgi::>::t %•r} • 1 600
40Ao.oii4.:'?`n`• ?i::>;:;:.{`;f:2u.:°.v:':rf::ft';t•C krtiCFri /J.7J.IC.
g{iit!/.•:#}t'iffi: ~::;~•:yy>::t4:i::... .~3.,•::,-~rr,•.: C .c:r•
}••.,;isir::•>r•'11.::91.:y=/''}@-.;4{,r'..-.,•.iryf~:ry:}:i:.•.:svg:.y}i 1
' .,•.4. \~:n •.vn'Eirtti:::xn•;.:...: Yi.,I;::i,. ~-'-•'.:?i1 {;.+{F+%?}:i?{ v{rif}n
ivJ•vr{• h:' } , .OV.;r'-T~:3~ir:•r::.v.:•
' ff'h{'{:•}•'`~~'~v~3': }r.}.:..'::Y.?: }:<f. ~:nktw.: •:.v}•: i;.: ':n, d
~:v~v,~i'.~?{~`y{•'y}~v':• ,}~':?lff/~@~.J.}.nfv~'•`.;}{~%ti ri:':}?: :v::::i ~:1i??.iii.':.:'n yfj\\{.:,:L;%::~{rCrriYi:':`ih::'
:vji \v}:. ••~4i "'{•,x:<.v{v <{;n}? vi.V ? }::1.: n \ v: ti..: vv ..i.....v}{Cr::v`Qr.
,,C t, .4,::;`}.::pn v:.6iiri':vfiif`'>:r,~:'S"'O'i f}{.': '•.'.v:.::.{vv
4} ~ ~C~ v.~r:..v. 4Y.v:: vttvv.Trri: i'4>}f r'''ri:::rivi:~v:~}'•...{iry ' 1
4 U v'} r}:.iiS?Y4ii'?'i:t.'f:•,:•r??h:{{iv: ..ry.'fvi.: i-}: v 3.::.rv:liy r:i rr,{•':.
ri;.~S}i~?'9'-'Gr•.:; :'~'u"-?.:•';•y,.:'r:;:ii"N.•..={;,.:.~'P`y-'?f.•:'•:k:::ir rr'?r:?::.`;i,.-~.`::Y' ( _N_
N.-
3 <w°i''r'.io>:?":..:i:~ \::i{:<?t.{•;yrcyt{{:iirrt•:::
v< ti :-':'`fi~sf~'n~:,,~;ti%:;r•.A{..::4a; i?'{^•'•"?' i:`: ',}•v }
t;.: Y'• frx ; i.:ft:;}..fu a Cf:.ft: i): " 13 ® 85
::'t:r• G `~tit'~S$• ;c'?. `:::ta{{raf3'~fr s~t%::.-.x..: t::.
:rt{~'~jr•t. "s. u".,cff,:;$~53~`:,•%>'.:S:yrA?r:... t{'?•a ~r`::.:~•
•c,%t. cx '•"~',+•,°:i•`.}r-;/ f .fir,:}~r2'}.::.t.,;>::r:::>{{t
':.•+,9•. r v+{i+~F{r~~ }Y)C{:l•{rJ:iij~'n4'ri;i:C:~}ni~~..v~{=.:::.y •ji.~.{k.,l t,rr•
. . i%~4v} +?:~YVvv•,ryn::}±L ~~i~%:.hiYr`M1rt:i'}~?y;:{ NNN
r.;~?`C;. r{,`:~Nt:'..: t4 ..:v ' ,-\y}:..$;`.`.`' ii:•iiSi:~?rv':Y/.y t00 300
:,:MaC.2~`•i.:. i'{;. 4;%rfi ...7,:8~•;'ir.::{:-yr..:i::^q.
502 501
t\f '~9 ~ r Can a n ~ 20` if ' £ H?k 4.05A&
o•'' ':3: e~ir /.t/Ae. NO SCALE
c{`+i`k,;r'.`.•'. ;;I:CCr~`•}'o;,iYyvl~:ti'•i:;F;'[S•u;•r.~k; v4:} :a
:a;~ f ~Gr+fo:..ti'r~ %%'t:w:••Yc ~`cp✓.d?y,: : x
-~~~'~,po°~f?'s, b.~t`i~. ~ "s: ~FJki,~a{ Vii{'^:: -•f%t£:.•,y+~:,`.•a ~ 3 0 O
U.LA. ~:v'•A$X+'i. t• C:. JnC'{rtl:••:v.:}:{:}':.:?,Cvrt:iii; ~F4y{•'{n\~i/,;::f.•~.+v' .
fir.''- t. f,:~r?~:<•{z..4..,s:::::: •il%.~. ' •"z 503 s.eoac.
k"~~'.,.r~'+r~_',t.{': f w ~ ::;•f rar2+r : • w"''' ~.>•;~,~"'o~,',"'.o,~ /.rrAe. ~i
'rtirr na. •.~,cn~%:•.,. ~y.':g~;h::•r?,:ir.- . -
W W,
•Y... :t.:{~c:,f'i{ti'i`:'.i;.~~n`~C:•'%,c}'-<'..'`'K-',n^-i~r.`'2.?'{``~Q~ t
:;-`Yt{•?,Y3''fW'~~'•>f~ - rr.~rurx:.c-v{{..o-rowk.:..
1400
i ~i~~~ E pGE 40.03 Ac
ZOOO t0 1100
LNGHVIEW SE~~
C~ SEE MAP
2S 14DC
/1
STAFF REPORT
JULY 17, 1989 - 7:30
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL
13125 SW HALL BLVD.
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
A. FACTS:
r
1. General Information
i
CASE: Zone Change Annexation ZCA 89-06 f•
REQUEST: To annex 40 acres of unincorporated Washington County into the
City of Tigard, and for zone change from Washington County R-6 i
to City of Tigard R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Washington County Residential, 6
units/acre.
t
ZONING DESIGNATION: Washington County R-6 (Residential, 6
units/acre).
APPLICANT: Edwin G. Daniel
4020 19th Avenue
Forest Grove, OR 97116
OWNER: Taira-Klaus Corporation r.
t
5865 SW 190th
Beaverton, OR 97007
LOCATION: South end of S.W. 135th Avenue, WCTM 2S1 4, TL 700.
s
2. Background Information.
4
k
No previous applications have been reviewed by the City relating to this
property.
t'
3. Vicinity Information
E.
S.W. 135th Avenue extends from the northeast property corner directly
north to S.W. Walnut Street. Along the northern border lies a number of
homesites that generally range in size from 1/2 to 2 acres in size. The
residences are located on either side of S.W. Fern Street which runs
east and west, with the easterly end intersecting with S.W. 135th
Avenue. Large undeveloped properties lie to the east, west, and south.
Benchview Subdivision lies to the southwest. This subdivision and the
land to the east of the property are currently within the City of
Tigard. The surrounding properties within Washington County are
presently zoned R-6 and the parcels within the City of Tigard are zoned
R-4.5 (Residential 4.5 units/acre).
4. Site Information and Proposal Description
i The property to be annexed is undeveloped and is on the lower portion of
the north slope of Bull Mountain. The property is almost entirely
wooded. The applicant requests an annexation to the City and has
indicated that a development proposal for a single-family residential
subdivision will follow.
5. Agency and NPO Comments
The Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation
indicates that it has no comments at this time, and that the agency
will review and comment at the time of development review.
The Engineering Division has the following comments and recommendations:
Findings
a. Road Access. The only existing road access to the property is via
SW 135th Avenue south of Walnut Street. This portion of SW 135th
currently lies outside the City limits and is not proposed to be a
part of this annexation.
The City, in conjunction with Washington County, is currently
preparing the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study. The
study area includes the area proposed for annexation. The study is
looking at alternative routes for providing collector street access
to property within the study area. The study process would
continue concurrent with the annexation proceedings. The study is
intended to complete the plan for road access to the Northeast
Bull Mountain area. When the study is completed, it should
adequately address the road system required for development of the
proposed annexation area.
b. Grading. Much of the site has slopes in excess of 25 percent. As
a result, development of the site will be difficult and will
require sensitive lands permits.
C. Drainage. Currently drainage of the site is through natural
drainage swales. No storm drainage improvements exist to serve
this site. The existing drainage swales cross private property
downstream. When the site is developed, it will be necessary to
improve drainage facilities downstream or to provide facilities to
assure that downstream drainage impacts are not increased.
d. Sanitary Sewer. The nearest available sanitary sewer connection is
in SW 135th Avenue north of Walnut Street. This existing sewer can
serve only the eastern portion of the site by gravity service. In
order to serve the western portion of the site, a pumping station
will need to be installed or a new sewer trunk line will need to be
extended to the site from Beaverton.
At ultimate development, the existing sewer in 135th Avenue is
LM 1 -1 1
expected to be at its capacity without serving the western portion
of the annexation site. Consequently, serving significant
l development within the western portion of the site could eventually
result in exceeding the capacity of the existing sewer line.
Therefore, some upgrading of the existing sewer system will
eventually be required to serve this site.
When the western portion of this site is devrLoped, it will be
necessary to thoroughly evaluate and plan for long term sanitary
sewer service. Provisions will need to be made to assure that k
development of this site does not lead to eventual overloading of !
the existing sewer system.
Recommendations
The Engineering Division has no objection to the proposed
annexation and zone change. The Division does caution that
development of the site will require special attention to road
access, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer service that may affect i.
the total cost of the project.
The Tigard Water District indicates no objection to the proposal. The
district does indicate that upon development it will be necessary for an
easement between Benchview and Bull Mountain Estates, and a pressure
reducing valve assembly and concrete vault will be necessary to serve
the proposed subdivision.
s
The Tigard Police Department, Consolidated Fire and Rescue District, and E,
Portland General Electric have no objections to the proposal.
No other comments have been received. f
i
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan
Policies 2.1.1, 6.4.1, 10.1.1, and 10.1.2 and Chapters 18.136 and 18.138
of the Tigard Community Development Code. The Planning staff has
determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of
the Tigard Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below:
1. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning
Organization and Community Planning organization as well as
surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an f
opportunity to comment on the request.
'r
c
2. Plan Policy 6.4.1 is satisfied because the annexation will be z
F
designated as a developing area on the development standards area
map. This designation will allow the use of planned development F
techniques which are better suited for preserving natural amenities 4
such as those found on the subject property.
E
3. Plan Policy 10.1.1 is satisfied because the City has conducted the
Bull Mountain/Walnut Area Urban Services Study which includes the
subject property. This study, as well as the comments from the
Engineering Division, Police Department, and other service agencies
indicate that adequate urban services are available in the vicinity
and may be extended to accommodate the subject property.
4. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the annexation will not
create an irregular City boundary, the Police Department has been
notified of this request, the land is located within Tigard•s area
of interest, and adequate service capacities can be made available
to accommodate the eventual development of the property as noted
above.
The Planning Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with
the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the
findings noted below:
1. Section 18.136.030 of the Code is met because all facilities and
services can be made available, the applicable Comprehensive Plan
policies discussed above have been satisfied and the property has
been determined to be a developing area in accordance with the
criteria in Chapter 18.138 of the Code.
The Urban Planning Area Agreement between the City and Washington
County requires that when annexing land within the City, area of
interest, the City adopt a zone designation which most closely
resembles the County plan and zone designation. In this case, the
property is designated in the Bull Mountain Community Plan for
single family residential use with a minimum lot size of 5,000
square feet and a maximum density of six units per acre. The City
R-7 zone with an identical minimum lot size requirement and maximum
density of seven units per acre is the most similar to the present
County designation.
2. Chapter 18.138 of the Code is satisfied because the property meets
the definition for a developing area and shall be designated as
such on the development standards area map.
C. RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the findings of the conclusions noted above, the Planning
staff recommends APPROVAL of ZCA 89-06, subject to the following
condition:
1. The property shall be designated as a developing area on the
development standards map.
PREPARED BY:
Keith S. Liden, Senior Planner
br/ZCA89-06