City Council Packet - 12/19/1988TIGARD CITY COUNCIL- PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate
BUSINESS AGENDA CATV sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available,
DECEMBER 19, 1988, 5:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are
13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters
TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting
either the Mayor or City Administrator.
x=5:30 o STUDY SESSION - Agenda Review
6:30 o WORKSHOP MEETING WITH LIBRARY BOARD
7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING:
1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Nun-Agenda Items
7:35 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please)
7:40 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
3.1 Approve Board & Committee Appointments - Resolution No. 88-
3.2 Approve City Center Plan Task Force Extension of Appointments -
Resolution No. 88-
3.3 Approve Washington County Tigard Urban Planning Area Agreement -
Resolution No. 88-
3.4 Receive & File:
a. Certified 11/8/88 Election Results
b. October- Department Monthly Report - Community Development
3.5 Approve Final Order - Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 88-04 Zone
Change ZC 88-10 Mielnik NPO #5 - Resolution No. 88-
3.6 Final Order Temporary Use TU 88-86, Variance V 88-31 KPSC/Key
Bank of Oregon Resolution No. 88--
3.7 Approval of 9-1-1 Agreement - Resolution No. 88-
3.6 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board
Meeting (LCRB):
- Copying Machines
Adjourn LCRB Meeting; Reconvene Council Meeting
7:45 4•
ANTON PARK ASSOCIATION PETITION - REQUEST FOR CLOSURE OF S.W. NORTH
DAKOTA STREET IN ANTON PARK (Tabled from the November 14, 1988 Meeting)
8:30 5.
THROUGH-TRUCK RESTRICTIONS - ORDINANCE NO. 88-
(Portions of North Dakota Street, Tigard Street and Springwood Drive;
Revising Truck Restrictions on Tiedeman Avenue)
o City Engineer
8:45 6.
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY CODE, CHAPTER 5.12,
EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICE (EMS)
o City Administrator
9:15 7.
NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff
9:30 8.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to
discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and
pending litigation issues.
10:00 9. ADJOURNMENT
cw/8378D
COUNCIL AGENDA - DECEMBER 19, 1988 - PAGE 1
COUNCIL MEETING MEETING UPDATE
December 19, 1988
a o STUDY SESSION Agenda Review
o WORKSHOP MEETING WI-1"H LIBRARY BOARD
1. BUSINESS MELTING:
Call To Order and Roll Call Ea arrived 8:55 p.m.
Call To Staff and Council For Non--Agenda Items
Presentation to Mayor Brian - Key to the City & Gavel Plaque
Presentatin to Joene Brian - Tigard Pin & Rose Bud
Resolution 88-110 Honoring & Commending Mayor Brian for years of
service to Tigard -Jo/Sc UA
Resolution 88-111 Honoring Joene Brian for her years of service
to Tigard - Br/Jo UA
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA No one
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
3.1 Approve Board & Committee Appointments - Resolution No. 88--112
(Amended - Removal of Phil Westover`s name; he advised he would
be unable to serve.)
3.2 Approve CCPTF Extension of Appointments - Resolution No. 88-113
3.3 Approve Wash. Co.-Tigard UPAAgreement - Resolution No. 88-114
3.4 Receive & File:
a. Certified 11/8/88 Election Results
b. October Department Monthly Report - Community Development
3.5 Approve Final Order - Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 88-04 Zone
Change ZC 88-•10 Mielnik NPO H5 - Resolution No. 88-•115
3.6 Final Order - Temporary Use TU 88--86, Variance V 88-31 KPSC/Key
Bank of Oregon - Resolution No. 88-116
3.7 Approval of 9-1-1 Agreement - Resolution No. 88-117
3.8 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board
Meeting (LCRB): Copying Machines
Adjourn LCRB Meeting; Reconvene Council Meeting
Sc/Ed with 3.1 amended as noted above - UA
4. ANTON PARK ASSOCIATION PETITION - REQUEST FOR CLOSURE OF S.W. NORTH
DAKOTA STREET IN AN'TON PARK (Tabled from the November 14, 1988 Meeting)
Presentation by representatives of neighborhood group noting traffic
volumes, safety concerns, and development issues
Sc/Jo - Motion to call for Public Hearing to consider temporary
closure of S.W. North Dakota Street; a recommendation from the Planning
Commission and Transportation Committee would be welcomed by Council
5. THROUGH-TRUCK RESTRICTIONS - ORDINANCE NO. 88-37 Jo/Sc UA
(Portions of North Dakota Street, Tigard Street and Springwood Drive;
Revising Truck Restrictions on Tiedeman Avenue)
6. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY CODE, CHAPTER 5.12,
EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICE (EMS)
Consensus to adopt
7. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: None
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Cancelled
9. ADJOURNMENT: 9:01 p.m.
cw/8378D
COUNCIL AGENDA - DECEMBER 19, 1988 - PAGE 1
T I G A R D C I T Y 0 0 0 N C I L
At, REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 19, 1988
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Tom Brian; Councilors Carolyn Eadon, Jerry
Edwards, Valerie Johnson, and John Schwartz. Staff Present: Pat Reilly,
City Administrator; Irene Ertell, Head Librarian (present for the Library
Board Workshop only); Jill Monley, Community Services Director; Ed Murphy,
Community Development Director; Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder; and
Randall Wooiey, City Engineer.
2. STUDY SESSION:
a. Agenda Review:
o City Administrator noted the need to amend the resolution as
proposed in Agenda Item No. 3.1 to remove Paul Westover's name.
Mr. Westover had advised he would be unable to serve on a board
or committee at this time.
o City Administrator highlighted several agenda items including
the proposed Urban Area Planning Agreement with Washington
County; the proposed 9-1-1 Agreement; and the proposed purchase
of copying machines.
o Cit- Engineer reported that the Anton Park Association agenda
item was not a public hearing. He advised that Neighborhood
Association representatives would be present and would ask to
speak. The neighborhood proposed to close a portion of S.W.
North Dakota Street. Staff would be recommending against
closure; however, they would suggest alternatives.
o City Administrator advised that the Environmental Quality
Commission (EQC) has required that a plan be developed by
February 15, 1989, for recyclable yard debris. Both METRO and
Washington County have advised they would assist cities with
a plan. After discussion, Council consensus was to notify
Washington County that the City would work with them on this
issue. It was mentioned that this may a good project to assign
to the Utilities & Franchise Committee.
o Council discussed the Tualatin Valley Economic Development
Commission (TVEDC). Council consensus was to support Councilor
(Mayor-elect) Jerry Edwards as Tigard's representative and
candidate for service on the TVEDC Board of Directors.
o Trammel-Crow Heliport Community Development Director
reviewed the status of the heliport at the Trammel-Crow site
(see memorandum dated 12/16/88 filed with the Council packet
materials). City Council had requested another public hearing
be held before the Hearings Officer because of questions
1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 19, 1988
concerning the heliport and the fact that DEQ's decision
concerning annual round trips per year was different from the
City's requirement.
Community Development Director advised that Staff had received
a letter from Trammell- Crow stating revised approval on number
of trips per year had been received from DEQ. The Hearings
Officer's decision was now consistent with approval granted
by DEQ and State Aeronautics. Community Development Director
advised that no additional hearings were warranted.
After discussion, Council consensus was that there would be
no additional public hearings and that a letter of explanation
was to be forwarded to the affected residents in the area.
3. WORKSHOP WITH LIBRARY BOARD
a. Library Board Members Present: Amo DeBernardis, Chairman; Paul
Hoefling, Jane P. Miller, Linda Monahan, Leslie Wismer. Library
Staff Present: Irene Ertell and Georgeanne Miller
b. Chairman DeBernardis updated Council on the Library's activities over
the last several months. During the course of the workshop, the
following items were presented and/or discussed:
o Circulation continued to grow with over 200,000 items checked
out.
o As the collection continues to grow, it was expected that
circulation would also continue to increase.
o The importance of volunteers was noted. The Library continues
to interface with the community in a positive fashion.
o The Library would be looking to the future utilizing new
technologies.
o Library expansion would be needed soon if growth continues;
satellite stations would be a possibility. The Board would
4L'tempt to visualize the future by taking a look at the "big
picture" of Tigard's needs, estimate a "price tag," and lay
out a plan.
o Electronics may offset building needs; i.e., WILI can access
collections throughout Washington County and the City of
Portland.
o Different, new media has come into demand; i.e., instructional
videos and compact discs.
o The Library would be 25 years old in May. The Board and
Friends of the Library would be planning a celebration.
o The Board would be reviewing the general operating efficiency
of the Library; i.e., books not being used could be stored off-
site.
o Budget review for next fiscal year would also encompass the
possibility of extending Library hours to include Sunday
afternoons (1-5 p.m.).
- COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 19, 1988
o Library currently has between 10-11,000 card holders.
o It was reported that a study is underway to determine the
feasibility of a Regional Lib, .ry to be administered by METRO.
Council consensus was for the need to maintain local control
and identity of libraries.
o It was noted that Federal grant funds were not available at
this time.
o Goal of Library Board: "Every citizen in Tigard to possess
a library card."
o Tigard's collection size: approximately 48-49,000.
o Student usage of the Library has increased.
C. Library Workshop Adjourned: 7:14 p.m.
4. NON AGENDA ITEMS:
a. Councilor Edwards presented to Mayor Brian the gavel the Mayor had
used throughout his term of office. The gavel was mounted on a
plaque and was given as a token of appreciation for his leadership
of Council.
Councilor Edwards also presented to Mrs. Brian a rose and a City of
Tigard logo pin as a token of appreciation for her voluntary support
role as the wife of an elected official.
b. RESOLUTION NO. 88-110 HONORING AND COMMENDING TOM BRIAN FOR HIS YEARS
OF SERVICE TO THE CITIZENS OF TIGARD.
Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to adopt
Resolution No. 88-110.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 88-111 HONORING JOENE BRIAN FOR HER YEARS OF SERVICE
TO THE TIGARD COMMUNITY.
Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor
Johnson, to adopt Resolution No. 88-111.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present.
5. VISITOR'S AGENDA - No one spoke.
6. CONSENT AGENDA: Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor
Edwards, to adopt the following consent agenda with the Resolution as
proposed for Item 6.1 to be amended to remove Mr. Phil Westover's name:
6.1 Approve Board and Committee Appointments - Resolution No. 88-112
(with Mr. Phil Westover's name removed).
6.2 Approve City Center Plan Task Force Extension of Appointments -
Resolution No. 88-113.
6.3 Approve Washington County-Tigard Urban Planning Area Agreement -
3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 19, 1988
Resolution No. 88-114.
6.4 Receive & File:
a. Certified 11/8/88 Election Results
b. October Department Monthly Report - Community Development
6.5 Approve Final Order - Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 88-04 Zone
Change ZC 88-10 Mielnik NPO #5 - Resolution No. 88-115
6.6 Approve Final Order - Temporary Use TU 10-86R, Variance V 88-31
KPSC/Key Bank of Oregon - Resolution No. 88-116
6.7 Approve 9-1-1 Agreement - Resolution No. 88-117
6.8 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board Meeting
(LCRB); Approve Purchase of Copying Machines as Proposed in Staff
Report; Adjourn LCRB Meeting; Reconvene Council meeting.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present.
ANTON PARK ASSOCIATION PETITION - REQUEST FOR CLOSURE OF S.W. NORTH DAKOTA
STREET IN ANTON PARK. (Tabled from November 14, 1988 meeting.)
a. City Engineer updated Council on this agenda item. Residents of
Anton Park have petitioned for closure of S.W. North Dakota Street
at the north edge of Anton Park.
In November, the Council received a written report from the City
Engineer regarding a request for closure of S.W. North Dakota Street
in Anton Park. City Engineer and Police Chief recommend denial of
the request for street closure. Alternative safety measures were
recommended in a report (see material filed with Council meeting
packet) from the City Engineer.
City Engineer reported he and the Police Chief have been working
with the neighborhood for about a year with regard to their
concerns. The petition requesting the closure is unusual because
it's requesting the closure of a collector street; generally, a
collector street status would be something that could not easily be
changed. In this case, staff recommended this be reviewed carefully
as there were some questions about the intent of the Comprehensive
Plan Map and the neighborhood's presentation which represented that
a unique situation exists in their neighborhood.
City Engineer advised that if a Comprehensive Plan Map change were
to be considered by Council, a formal public hearing would be
required.
The notations on the Comprehensive Plan Map were not conclusive with
regard to this section of the street. City Engineer noted the
Planning Commission and other bodies had reviewed the development
when Anton Park was approved and built in 1984-85. At that time,
both the City Engineer and the Planning Director had interpreted the
map to require North Dakota Street to be put through as it was now.
Because the officials and commissioners involved with approving the
development had also worked on the Comprehensive Plan Map creation,
City Engineer reported he relied on their interpretation and,
Alp,
4 - COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 1988
therefore, agreed that the street that was there now was in
agreement with the Comprehensive Plan.
City Engineer advised that the issue before Council was whether or
not to initiate a formal hearing process to consider changing the
Comprehensive Plan to delete a portion of North Dakota Street from
the Collector Street System.
City Engineer advised this issue had been considered by NPO 07 the
week before. Neighborhood representatives were also present and
presented their arguments for street closure. After discussion, the
NPO voted unanimously not to support the street closure, but
strongly encouraged the City to work closely with the neighborhood
to address their safety concerns.
City Engineer outlined reasons for the staff's recommendation of
denial of the request for closure. Staff's opinion was that the
street should be kept open as part of the City's traffic circulation
system to provide adequate traffic capacity and routes for emergency
services. It was recommended that through truck traffic be
eliminated on this street (Ordinance proposed in Agenda Item No.
5.).
City Engineer further recommended that the City continue to strongly
urge the State to improve Scholls Ferry Road. Once improved, City
Engineer advised that he felt much of the traffic would be
redirected on to Scholls Ferry Road. It appears this project will
proceed in the 1990-91 construction seasons.
Staff also has recommended that improvements be made to S.W. 121st;
the Traffic Safety Bond Measure (approved by the voters in November)
provided funding to accomplish this. (This would include
improvements at the intersection of S.W. 121st and Scholls Ferry.,
City Engineer also advised that the City of Beaverton has considered
a change to their Comprehensive Plan that would connect S.W. 121st
and 125th (Sorrento Road) in Beaverton. Although this has been
delayed a few months, City Engineer recommended that the City of
Tigard go on record as being in support of this change.
City Engineer advised that if Council should decide not to pursue
closure of S.W. North Dakota Street, staff should be directed to
continue to work with the neighborhood on other methods to reduce
the traffic concerns.
City Engineer reviewed with Council a map on display noting where
the proposed street closure was located.
b. Presentation by Anton Park Representatives:
Jeanne Rohlf, 12430 S.W. North Dakota Street, Tigard, Oregon advised
she would give background information concerning why the neigborhood
5 - COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 1988
believes the street should be closed as well as distinguishing
factors which demonstrate why their street should not be designated
as a minor collector street.
Ms. Rohlf identified on a map where the closure of the street was
being proposed. (See Anton Park Association letter to Tigard City
Council dated April 20, 1988.) She outlined how area was being
developed noting that much of the new development does not face S.W.
North Dakota as does their subdivision. She noted the current and
planned development in the vicinity which would impact the
residential neighborhood.
She advised the problem the residents have been encountering
included the following:
o Sorrento Street (aka: 125th Street), as a minor arterial,
was designated to carry between 7,500 and 25,000 average daily
traffic vehicles at a speed between 35-50 mph. This street
feeds directly into S.W. North Dakota Street which was
classified as a minor collector. Under the City of Tigard
terms, a minor collector street was designated to carry 500 -
3,000 average daily vehicles at speeds of 25-30 mph.
o Much of the traffic was stopping at the intersection of
Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. North Dakota Street and then
proceeding to S.W. 121st using S.W. North Dakota Street. This
way, the motori,~ avoids two traffic signals. This traffic
travels at a much faster rate than the designated 25 mph.
Policemen who patrol the area advise the speeds are often in
the 40-60 mph range. She said that traffic volume many times
has been so high that it has been unsafe for police patrols
to stop the cars.
o Highlighted on the map for council review were markings
designating the different types of streets throughout the
City, including: arterials, major collector streets, minor
collector streets. Ms. Rohlf advised that nowhere else in the
City would you find a minor arterial feeding directly into a
minor collector street.
o The neighborhood's understanding of the Comprehensive Plan was
that minor collector streets were intended to take traffic
from local streets and deliver it to more major collector
streets to provide access from residential areas to major
streets. The neighborhood does not believe that the street
usage on S.W. North Dakota Street is following the Plan. In
fact, the street connection between a minor arterial and minor
collector has created an incongruent nature for the street
which automatically defaults to a higher level of usage.
o Additionally, along S.W. North Dakota, there was the
Summerlake Park access. Children riding bicycles to the park
41- 6 - COUNCIL. MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 1988
have not been afforded a safe route due to the high traffic
IQ. volumes and excessive speed.
o The neighborhood has felt the Police Department has been very
supportive of the residents. There have been frequent
patrols and concern expressed by individual police officers;
however, the problem has not been rectified.
o Traffic measures were reviewed; the State of Oregon figures
with regard to capacity at the signals at intersections
affecting S.W. North Dakota at Scholls Ferry indicate the
usage has been maximized.
Ms. Rohlf reviewed traffic figures which she estimated would
result if the proposed cul-de-sac (street closure) were to be
approved.
Traffic figures recently obtained indicate the neighborhood
has received about a 25% increase in traffic volumes since
summer of '88.
If all the lots become occupied in the area, it was estimated
that vehicle trips per day generated by local traffic would
be sufficient to continue to designate the street as a minor
collector street.
Mark Johnson, 11100 S.W. Tony Court testified that new figures on
traffic levels puts the street at about 20% above the optimum level
for a minor-collector street. Phase One of the subdivision was
approximately 2/3 complete (with little activity over the last year)
and Phasa Two remained undeveloped. He advised the neighbors were
concerned that the reason the area had not developed as planned was
due to the traffic situation. He said tax revenues would be lost
should the area remain undeveloped.
Mark LaMantia, 11110 S.W. 124th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon advised he
was concerned about the procedural aspects associated with this
situation. The issue appeared to be whether or not Council should
hold a public hearing with regard to the closure of this road. The
Association urged Council to initiate the public hearing process on
the merits presented. If Council does not choose to initiate the
formal hearing process, the recourse available to the neighborhood
would be to file for a formal review before the Land Use Board of
Appeals (LUBA).
Mr. LaMantia advised that he felt the Association established their
unique situation; no precedent would be set by the proposed road
closure.
He further explained that the situation, as the neighborhood has
experienced it, has been that their street has served as a bypass
from a major arterial to a major collector. This has been further
'Ar
7 - COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 1988
impeded by having a minor arterial from another City (Beaverton)
Arl directly intersecting with their street. This situation does not
exist anywhere else in the City. Because of the surrounding traffic
designations, S.W. North Dakota automatically defaults to a higher
level of usage; motorists are bypassing the routes which were
designed to handle the traffic flow and using S.W. North Dakota
Street as a short-cut route.
Mr. LaMantia has been told by the Police Department that a high
percentage of Beaverton residents have been issued tickets on their
street. This was a further indication that the proper function of
S.W. North Dakota Street has not been served.
In meetings with the Police Department, City Engineer, and the NPO,
everyone agreed a problem existed; however, no solution was agreed
upon.
He further advised that the closure of the street would force
traffic to the major arterials and collectors where it was intended
to go without taking undue traffic away from the existing
intersections (also scheduled for future improvement).
With regard to emergency vehicular access, Mr. LaMantia advised that
the Fire Department stated it would function well enough should the
City deem closure of the street was preferable. Other services also
would not be negatively impacted.
41 The levels of usage would increase and the problems will worsen as
development continues in surrounding areas.
In response to a question by Councilor Johnson, Mr. LaMantia noted
the following concerns with regard to the options presented by
staff:
o The Neighborhood Association would support the prohibition of
through-truck traffic; however, through-truck traffic was not
the primary focus of their problem.
o The prohibition of all through traffic would be the primary
goal of closing the road. Posting of signs would create an
enforcement problem.
o Improvement of sight distance could have the adverse effect
of encouraging increased speed.
o A traffic marking system such as buttons or speed bumps create
problems for pedestrians and bicyclists as well as a noise
disadvantage.
o Planter islands brought forth concerns with regard to
maintenance, design, and safety (i.e., visibility).
4 8 - COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 1988
o Current speed limits, if adhered to, would be consistent with
speeds for a minor collector.
Mr. LaMantia maintained that the above alternatives do not address
the problem. The Association recommended Council hold hearings with
regard to closure of a portion of S.W. North Dakota Street.
Estes Iniedicur, 11150 S.W. 123rd Place, Tigard, Oregon, testified
there were retirees in the neighborhood who were anxious about the
current safety problems noting it was dangerous to cross the street.
He believed the problem stemmed from motorists taking a shortcut to
avoid two traffic signals. He suggested one solution might be to
close the street on a temporary basis.
Linda Schulz, 11105 S.W. Highway 240, Newberg, Oregon testified as
the developer of the property. She noted the problems with sales
of property because of the busy street and attributed at least one
sale loss directly to the traffic problem. She also said that
builders would not develop on this property until the issue had been
resolved.
Marcia Smythe, 11185 S.W. 125th Place also noted that with the
traffic traveling so fast, it was difficult to cross the street
safely, especially anywhere near the curve.
(Note:
Councilor Eadon arrived - 8:55 p.m.)
Ar-
c.
Council consideration. Lengthy discussion followed among Council,
staff, and legal counsel concerning options available. Based on the
information presented, Councilors individually indicated approval
of initiating public hearing proceedings for a temporary street
closure. The street closure, if approved, would most likely be
conditional upon future development and improvements to the traffic
patterns both by the City of Tigard and the City of Beaverton.
d.
Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to call
for a Public Hearing to consider temporary closure of S.W. North
Dakota Street; a recommendation from the Planning Commission and
Transportation Committee would be welcomed by Council.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present.
8. THROUGH-TRUCK RESTRICTIONS - ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION
a.
City Engineer reviewed this agenda Item. (See Council Agenda
Summary submitted and filed with the Council packet material.)
b.
ORDINANCE NO. 88-37 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING T.M.C. 10.16.051;
PROHIBITING THROUGH TRUCKS ON PORTIONS OF NORTH DAKOTA STREET,
TIGARD STREET AND SPRINGWOOD DRIVE; REVISING TRUCK RESTRICTIONS ON
TIEDEMAN AVENUE; AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
9 - COUNCIL
MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 1988
C. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to
adopt Ordinance No. 88-37.
The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present.
9. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY CODE, CHAPTER 5.12,
EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICE (EMS)
a. Mayor noted this item had been discussed during the Study Session
portion of the meeting. Council consensus was to adopt the Code as
presented.
10. NON AGENDA ITEMS - None
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Cancelled.
12. ADJOURNMENT: 9:01 P.M.
Approved by the Tigard City Council on January 23, 1989.
Deputy Recorder, City of Tigar
ATTEST-
or, City of Tigard
41 10- COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 1988
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7_6787
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice
~r- BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising
City of Tigard
• PO Box 2 3 3 9 7 • ❑ Tearsheet Notice
• Tigard, OR 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit ~pp 119,
• •
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON, )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss.
I, Elaine Petrogeorge
being first duly sworn, depose and say,l~iLtdPT tgo,&gvertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of the
a newspaper of general circYation ag defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at -gar in the
aforesaid county and state- that the
Citv Council Meeting Notice
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for 1 successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
December 15, 1988
47 ell
Subscrib nd sworn t efore me this c ember 16, 1988
I~ ary Public for Oregon
My Commission Expires:9 / 2 0 / 9 2
r ^1
r;
AFFIDAVIT, _ -'t ft
a
1'LLl WGl 111 V1111G1U
der, 13125'SW'Ha
d ilv coUI
5.34E
~i3125
ti
s s.
- rte. 1 .
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In the Matter of the Proposed
0rd 11-? &v U i k- J?
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss
City of Tigard )
-50 e/-0
I, D Mk- Gku r e Z-6&.4-t- on
-oath, depose and say:
That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of
Ordinance Number(s) -3-)
which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated `lk'ceyr~~i~ / , ICI&g
copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a
part hereof, on the 7~ day of . 1985•
1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon.
2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon
3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
4. Albertson's Store, Corner of Pacific Hwy. (State Hwy. 99) and
S.W. Durham Road, Tigard, Oregon
Subscribed.and sworn to before me this or n day of Al-/-[ydrt~L~Fi~ 19Lp
Notary Public for Oregon
My Commission Expires: 14
AGENDA ITEM # - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE ) a) i VH
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council
wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you
first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City
Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
~n ~y n k Gtssn .
NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED
~"l s "t ~~-n n2, ~ %L ~ f l a~ 3~ ~w rJ. ~~kaZ Or~h .
V 1 I I~l0 S0 1211 U. l~r It t 6,fi
0 s W Tom (Ak<dTrl
~c
r~
Ell
rr
Ate`
' S+u~ SC's5; vr-~
12hg19-6
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ed Murphy, Director of Community Development
FROM: Keith Liden, Senior Planner
RE: Trammell Crow Heliport
DATE: 12/16/88
The purpose of this memorandum is to review the status of the heliport and to
offer a recommendation relating to the City Council's decsion to hold another
public hearing before the Hearings Officer regarding this matter. Before
discussing the current status of this case, it is useful to review the events
leading up to the Council's decision to have a second hearing.
June 22, 1988: A public hearing is held by the Hearings Officer and the
issues of noise and frequency of flights were discussed.
July 6, 1988: The Hearings officer signed a final order with 13
conditions (copy attached). These conditions included
stipulations regarding number of flights (max. 60 round-
trips per month, 720 per year), limiting the approach
path generally over Washington Square and Highway 217,
limiting the hours of operation between 8:00am to 6:00pm
daily, State Aeronautics Division approval, and
Aar" helicopters used shall not exceed the noise level
generated by the Bell 206L aircraft.
July 11,1988: Staff notifies DEQ and State Aeronautics about the
conditional use approval.
July/August DEQ notifies the staff that the approval granted by the
Hearings Officer is not consistent with DEQ's approved
noise analysis (July 19th letter attached). The approval
granted by DEQ was for a total of 520 round-trips per
year - not 720. DEQ indicated that the City was only
agency that had enforcement authority and the City
conditions should be revised to allow a maximum of 520
round-trip flights annually. Based upon the discrepancy
between the information submitted to DEQ and City, the
staff determined that a second hearing was in order and
notice was sent to nearby property owners as well as the
NPO and CPO. A hearing date of September 1, 1988 was
set.
September: The hearing is cancelled until further notice and all
entitled parties were notified.
October: A letter was received by the City Council from Burke
Thornburg and Ward Rader from CPA-4 requesting that the
matter be reviewed at a public hearing before the City
Council (copy attached). The Council directed staff to
arrange a public hearing before Hearings Officer. A
written response was sent to Mr. Thornburg indicating the
Council's action and informating him that the hearing
would only be opened to consider the issue pertaining to
the number of flights and that the Council could not hold
its own separate hearing (copy attached).
November: Staff received a letter from Trammell Crow stating that a
revised approval for 60 round-trip flights (720 per year)
had been obtained from DEQ and that because of this, a
second hearing was not justified.
Nov.-Dec.: Staff confirmed that a revised DEQ approval was granted
and the information presented to DEQ, in terms of number
and type of aircraft and noise impact, was the same as
that presented at the City's public hearing on June 22nd
(revised DEQ approval attached).
Since the facts in this case have not changed and the Hearings Officer's
decision is consistent with approvals granted by DEQ and State Aeronautics, I
recommend that no additional hearings are warranted. The confusion primarily
resulted because of the applicant having two different proposals being reviewed
si.multaineously by different agencies. If Council agrees with this
recommendation, I strongly suggest that a letter of explanation be sent to all
interested parties so they understand the rational behind the decision.
3, 1
1-11
11
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: December 19, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: December 9, 1988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: _ ,PREVIOUS ACTION:
Board and Committee Appointments /l.] _
DEPT HEAD OKN, i I CITY ADMIN OK
Board and Committee Appointments
PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet
REQUESTED BY: ALppointmerits Advisory Con).
I
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Appointments Advisory Committee met on November 30, and December 8, 1988,
to interview 20 citizens who are interested in appointment or reappointment to
a city advisory committee. At this time the Committee is recommending the
following appointments:
Committee
Economic Development Com
Park Board
Planning Commission
Name
Sue Clark
Jim Corliss
Brian Moore
Robert Pierce
Joy Crouch
reappointment
reappointment
reappointment
reappointment
new appointment
Term Expires
1/16/90
1/16/90
1/16/90
1/16/90
1/16/89
Mariann Bither reappointment 12/31/92
Carolyn DeFrang reappointment 12/31/92
Harry Saporta new appointment 7/1/90
Transportation Advisory Coin. Ron Holland reappointment 12/31/90
Robert Waterman new appointment 12/31/89
Phil Westover new appointment 12/31/90
Barbara Zanzig new appointment 12/31/90
Utility & Franchise Adv. Com. Mark Irwin reappointment 12/31/91
Dan Walsh reappointment 12/31/91
Eldon Wogen reappointment 12/31/91
In addition, the Committee is recommending to the Planning Commission
appointments of individuals to Neighborhood Planning Organizations.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Appointment of those individuals listed above.
2. Do not appoint any of the individuals listed above.
3. Appointment of selected individuals listed above.
FISCAL IMPACT
Not Applicable
SUGGESTED ACTION
Recommend alternative #1, to support the Appointments Advisory Committee
recommendations listed above.
dc:8353D
RECEIVED
Ali 12 1984
INVENTORY OF CITIZENS CITY OF jjGARO
Suggested for Community Service
DATE
NAME, L.ISS RES. PHONE - ~3°
ADDRESS- Cr7 ~~o Vi n~E~ ( BUS. PHONE L3& 31
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD_ 4( /Z SUGGESTED BY
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Nnl~142f ASrtINil, T6A
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND _ 14 114tI/I1l n n! S1,9ff
h('017D1TTOMAI CTATTIq AND BACKGROUND
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES _
T
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS)
BOARDS OR COMMITTEES INTERESTED IN /,(/,~ZJC,/~ Zt~G~rL//11tit/C t~h'L'Ct~r~LS _
;)ate Received at City Hall_ Dat:~ Int.erview%~d
Date Appointed /-/6_ P Board or Committee
INSIDE CITY __X---Aj PC (r, G'ITSIDE CITY
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY (),V/~ 7A Pdtfati d74khZ jP,4A,Sy,0S AiQ 3
t
4YL
C 'OF TICriARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
NAME: ~21P-rJ
17.,•2 -SI
'~SS :i S Sw
ADDRESS (RES.): :I ED
o u , FI-C
IqECEIVEO
FES w'a 19~T
CITY OF T14ARD
DATE:
RES. PHONE: (D2.O -CLc
BUS. PHONE: (o4'J` X0-35\
ADDRESS (BUS.): 1 S aD
C\ SUGGESTED BY: ~~C~►UrcSZIO~I- W RN
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: c~V_tvzoQ-T FfdprlhUE's
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? ~d~~A `tRS1
~O~[(A~fl
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
17C~Z ~Z C~C~2~-L IL~.7 r~~rr ti n ~'a-l/~L. J lq, - \q-1 Z
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND:-
lj 11 E E- ~~~~L~
1ClL~~~le l7ESlC9r eC~~L-I"L3Y \9-18- ~Cl~~rcS~l`IY~1D-LO(Z
l
18-20 - 11-12 ~ SEfZr.s~G6
HON LANG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM?
IS 41 CS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)?
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: 1M~
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES
i
pip l -rTLF--- LC Y-.)
INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARK : ML( ~-f -{1 1. ~ / C
r 1 Y a 4N\~R_ r r~~ J_ ` RxLlOar .J
X-e
BOARC., CUMM[TCEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN•
~ Q
Date Keceived ac CiCy Hall Dace lnCcrviewcd
OaC¢ AppoiRCed dd Hoard, CoinwiCtcc, (It NPO
c)ucsidc City _
(ns i<lc CiCy X -
(03461))
C
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
NAME: J Q V V. rWL
ADDRESS (RES.): y,64-'5 ~ j&1V lib
ADDRESS (BUS.): " ' ~r
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 2
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? eR J e
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND : /1 S n1
4
CITY OF TIFA RD
OREGON i
• DATE: '1 6
' / ,reeler br'1Ye ~ R s PHONE: C - 6 2-`2
~W st, W. PHONE: ~~GL~-9t7a1 L'~
f-1 '7 ~ U~ SUGGESTED BY:
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: 010M,AQu~Ll Oct (le ms SIN S
ll y~" A- t at, t e 1% 1. -I a_. 1 / / V/ n A 1 i A I„ -1-- . n.
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS
FIRM?
CS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO A
REA (NPO APPL CANTS
ONLY)?
EVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: yrd
Me M
h r - i1 A)
AJ(7 C;r
ee Je i~(JMPnIe)I~C'r
dS 1 .
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES : - 2
_ i
61j-'1V13
'R2--P it ' P, N C
4
cal ~ i Sr. t y ('oU NCB , I - 00 I .t j k~ `Gc C~ 1^i.--,J CX- ~j 0D I Ike/G /~iG> r
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS) ( `
: _ Gl-fh GUMS t- Yj L~~Y e-h l~ CSR I•';
C~
BO RDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: - ) J; - r U-)' uJl,; G
Date received at City Hall ? _7 Date Interviewed
Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO
Inside City _x A; PO Outside City
2-
cs/4772A
13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
OREGON!
25 Years of Service
9961-1986
k
DATE:
NAME :
ADDRESS (RES : ~I /3 SG/• T - y G~- RES . PHONE: S3 I
ADDRESS (BUS.): BUS. PHONE: _
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 4,(,V X. ✓ SUGGESTED BY: ii
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? 4-T~ti ~~~/9
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS
V_-
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM?
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? `
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: T=
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES:
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS):
BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED
0- 02,
Date received at City Hall
Date Appointed
7
4 side City X _ en
1172W)
irate interviewea
Board, Committee, or NPO _
Outside City
13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
r 0 - 1987,
Ci'
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
NAME: 01110J-6 / Yin 1~L1 . f j'i~CL~~q
ADDRESS (RES.): ll& So G£). ThhG co e_ TikG e AS
ADDRESS (BUS.):
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD:
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? /yj 7~-? q rf pC<
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: L1Lj ¢S S Cr ~°l~ P C~
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: /-.,2
/ ~~cS~ /7 ✓PGf't ~G y b PPIU e
OREGON
25 Years of SeMce
1961-1986
DATE: i'n
RES. PHONE : 3 9- ee 0 F 3
BUS. PHONE:""
-SUGGESTED BY: 5;1
w X, 4/ S 17 ezc) 7 !zE
/ ~•f C~ ~ Q U e "L ~ h / /CY f-
c^~
HOW LONG AVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM?
S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)?
eREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: (/O/c~u ~PPf Jo Ak 74d
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES:
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS) : V u e A' -4t' d GJP / N is c e 2/
aK /
L-7
i 1~i v L' e~~y-l7 Pnait AC -,4 t/,,
Q W /ppiw~ 7P c°Zt r ~G 7 /GC - o C~u C` 'C~
Gr 1it r c-ri y7` c'zC f (3~~ k- /°fk- .0 .1 ty/t e ~ aI e- Qa 7e &1- 4L,
BOARDS, COMMITTEES R NPO INTER~TED IN: ~/n o / fcf c' 7~c'
liQfr%c ~Pa~e ~a ~arie~c✓~~-eatic.6L r e ~~h~v ~ ~y y ~.,.fPi~P.s'~~ ~ ./c e
1 ' 9V -1;4e
.c-{i o ~e, / . c .t cS a'uS e a 6 :4e «/~/a ~n O isy~/a o c/ ~z i
Date received at City Hall /U - Date Interviewed
Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO
Inside City X !J rr. outside City
L172W)
y
13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
C
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
NAME: ~.cJs~ ~c✓ J~-~~ ~~i~ir/ c~
ADDRESS (RES.): 9710 1;74Cycr1e6_ 7 ~,4,QD
ADDRESS-.(-BUS..) :
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: ~.ytA SUGGESTED BY:
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY?
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: ~7`u',y7' ~GC✓
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND:
yr • a~ • L _ .E)--. e~cy_<_ ss e--r-!
,OW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? _
S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO
7" "C eov
L
APPLICANTS ONLY)? Q pp/
1;9 ' PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY:
/9~/c. e cS . IiKZ71'1 x. Iax- OD/«
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES : w o J cj A"d
1 / A- LcJ . -
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS):
BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: d~---
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Date received at City Hall . Date Interviewed I 'q 0 't T: q 0 P
Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO
Inside City f, Outside' City
OREGON
DATE: - 7- J a
RES. PHONE: 413 jC-Oc35-
BUS. PHONE:
-4 -PIC
i
cs/4772A
13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
C
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
OREGON
NAME: ~OBEQT yl/i~77'•~p~~A DATE: -,2
TV Y (f)Se RES. PHONE: a2q~P
ADDRESS (RES.): ~~JQ•r S, W. 4;;eW
ADDRESS (BUS.): v y 7,Q .1 y BUS. PHONE:
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY:
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY?
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: B• S- C .z d3e.E • y'
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: i15;kG107- ,oQW. NG,//5~~~/~
t-,Cnl. ~di1/TP~G729.P` Co~vsU,~Ti/yG •~,/s,2.
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? NS .340 S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO'AREA (NPO APPL CANTS ONLY).?.~!W-R:5.
IkIREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: iq7-eX C4MM/~'~S/QJ✓~P 1/G/~.P.~ ~/ST
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES:
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS):
BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN:
Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed
Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO(/,J~w C~17
Inside City k outside City
cs/4772A
13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
f
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
NAME: /vN/L /P .S W~-'%- Ta LAc R DATE:
ADDRESS (RES.): /03f~0 SuJ i~/G L L :'L-uJ TiGA,C'D 97223 RES.
ADDRESS (BUS.): A7yc C /n/C. 2&01 C2ES7-y, cW DR Ny W 3LP- G BUS.
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: /D yL`FAR S SUGGESTED BY:
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? &/qAl 'DZ/dE& WA , ReC7-L/91✓,0 6k- ,
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: AS~~c'/ATES /~EG/C'~c /A/ TELE[/._sivn! P..,e,6D /LT/a/1/
f1CC/.'Cd/TcL7 AS "S~n,1.'C/, p!'OrCSS/Jnl.9L C'L/,Q/c~E/✓rL'J PU2SU/ U
Gus"/Nc SS
,A/ I~uMHn / /'E3L`u/E C E C I ERSO/✓/yrEG) d/9 CyE6o,C `s //V
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: 17 yE/~2S /i1/ PE/,-5,0A ✓EL -TyFE Gf1y,0t,MyS7-1-V
IAI A5' 1W 'LO %f TRA/s1/in/C7~Dc dE~c+P~9C/~/T 9- SAf'ET ol. IN G'c!2/ZE~/T /D - YEAlc
,474 r,O R HSPEC73 Z)F
Po517-10n/ /a5 PERSOn/AIEL /~IAn~AI,E~ HAdE 6EEi✓ /r✓dot UE~ /r~~ Acs J-,F1eS0WVeL 4e.6AK
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? /O Vg"IZS
S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? /UD
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ACT/&'E //VL'Oi-rJEMEn/T //V /3D Y SL1-,1-17 5 j nl"Enl T
Off-3'1 En/% Gc- NE6U3'51?C7 RoTra2 y CC cl6 ; L/Try E LE/~GL/E G~v.2,C /n/
~vrrG/E2
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: 12d'lR0 /YJEML3F2,
PC4'50AIIVE1- AS56C/AT/DA1,' IWAA/y /aDMi/1:'ST2AT/dE ~U1 SCDU. T Ct.~UNC'/L Pe'S17-/e10
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS) : L'c'MP~/T~~2 L/TC/zATE ; E/V.ic"> LE/~.2/V//✓6
"YHE SySTcM " ~ / //~/Tc2c ST c~ //1~ HELf'i/JCi Mti G'~~MG~rt!/T~> .
N 7 c✓%/E2 r 4fA,11j / !__'A/✓
BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: /N 4.+1,1711 /b/l G'llsy Sc:NE04~L t
Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed
Date Appointed
Board, Committee, or NPO
Inside City X ,A,' P C I , Outside City
cs/4772A
13125 SW Hall Blvd., RO. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
CITY OF
OREGON
11-26-89
PHONE: 6 ZO-68 fb
PHONE: 539-?11-71
IiY
r ' ~YU
dFTI(,ARD
v
CITLz9N COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
NAME: N1 ARK A. ~FZw1U1
ADDRESS (RES.): 11135 SW lar,u'' Ply-_ j1gc,-cl a•7 L7.,3
ADDRESS (BUS.): q0p SLU. 6~
_ Fo
AUG p~,(1986
uq
q
DATE:
RES. PHONE:
BUS. PHONE: ~,10.OSlS~ 3
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 2 ri1AVtI.1~S SUGGESTED BY: A WLkapt
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? wekb LP-nrn o'-EDIICATIONAL BACKCROUND: Q.S. fA Acc.)byK iI A L)n; `G1S.1tA ok ~r44Dn Sol1A lit'
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND; _~erb~~tst~ PUb~1C #~cGOUh~km~ AS 1d0.~►ti-F
_ Cnr+i'rolter avid ~~~o~►~tng 11'lA.~.ns~e.r I~'ta.~k~,b a 0n.~, ~cn'~am~. 4r
V v I
4~8c- P~;t~, w~►l~ovzz _(.,PA`g . R~g3-- ylgb,
HOW KONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? 3 AtoA4s
I
db-,THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)?
0, 4
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY:
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: -
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): 1 ~Grt ppn-{-~C~ba n i1~Y>~lA
~oj cMt ox ~ls ( CI -N _ A q, lls 100 ro
1 IGr a A"4. --t-. n. „ . 1 A. 'n -L•
~.unQ. YM~('M t S Y v '
D
ISO DS. COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: mI-ge<-
ate Received at City Hall Date Interviewed -67 g b~
c Appointed Board, Committee. ot NI'O
de City Outside Cicy
IV n:.
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
NAME:
ADDRESS (RES•): A ND
ADDRESS (BUS.):
SUGGESTED
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN'TIGARD:.
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY?
EDIICATIONAL BACKGVLOUNDC / ~b L.a G 550
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND. B9q=OIIND:.i
HOW LONG HAVE YOII BEEN keLOYED• WITH THIS -FIR21? MOS' i
.IS THIS COMPANY' LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)?
pREVIOIIS .COMIUTNZTY. ACTIVITY:'
+t e ~ r ~.n n in . t 2! 4
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: ~~5 W mo'd' PD R-"~ C~-"~® PAR JC
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): ~1 .a~i3 6
b n
.BOARDS, COMMITTEES Od luo INTERESTED IN: _ ~/S ~e A'~ s•~
Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed ! ~a O b 0
Date Appointed dt~/ / Fl8 Board, Committee, or NPO.3
Inside City Outside City
cs/4772A
13125 SW Hall Blvd., p.0 Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
OREGON
DATE:
RES.. PHONE: a5383
BUS.. PHONE: .(~,,Qr$S- u
A -A
N OF TIFA RD
NAME: ~l doA r
;3630
ADDRESS (RES.):
ADDRESS (BUS.): `I)40 S ty a,:~a. -
DATE: 2/? 5-1 06 7
RES. PHONE: ( 63y- (o
BUS. PHONE: 63c(-,3 ( 3 `e
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: yrS SUGGESTED BY:
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY?
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Q ~J 5 n s ftn ~a~~d S t',n, ,rsAu
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND:
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? 4-v5-
I 1:HIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)?
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: sc:PVe.c~ o.A wc' .1 d-
-
klkk-" Lo
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES:
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS):
11 4 1S . COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: 1 (mac. A Spa e%A ~
- c► r1/L~~~
Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed ~r% - Ti ff`
Uatc Appointed Hoard, Committee, pit N110
Inside city X ,U n(1' Outside City
f T
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
(0346p)
C
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION \ OREGON
NAME: SA R-RA-kA gc,674 i DATE:
ADDRESS (RES.): IM05 W 3rd Ave Tigard 971Qa3 RES. PHONE:
ADDRESS (BUS )r~Sbt~ I ~In g70~a BUS . PHONE: (o$S- 1,34
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: VIn SUGGESTED BY::F(-,
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? ~klLS,~D V
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
STATUS AND BACKGROUND:
HOW LONG.HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? Int UP1Ll"5
Aff'
3 THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR _N" /~POA~REA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? • V',0
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: jgaAL l _d Firig 1/~(', ~u C if PGO-'\ .
Ar-
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: ~b ~1 T
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS):
BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN:
Date received at City Hall .3-0,4-9? Date Interviewed S~a b(S P
Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO
Inside City ~ -:;tt 0(~" Outside City
cs/4772A
13125 SW 1*311 Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
~.z
Force Appointments PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet
DEPT MEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK V, 1 REQUESTED BY: Appointments Advisory Com.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: _December 19, 1988DATE SUBMIT'I"ED:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: PREVIOUS ACTION:
Extension of City Center Plan Task;!
December 9 1988
City Center Plan Task Force Appointments are expiring and need to be extended.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City Center Plan Task Force is continuing work on the City Center Plan.
The term of office as set by the originating Resolution No. 86-134 established
appointment until 12/31/87, to be extended if necessary. According to that
resolution they can be extended for one year at a time. In January, 1988,
Resolution No. 88-05 extended these terms through December 31, 1988. It is
now necessary to extend these terms for one more year. The attached
resolution will extend these terms through December 31, 1989.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
FISCAL IMPACT
Not Applicable
SUGGESTED ACTION
Recommend approval of the attached resolution extending terms for City Center
Plan Task Force members.
dc:8353D
. 33
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: December 19, 1988 _ DATE SUBMITTED: December 9,.._1988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE, Urban Planning PREVIOUS ACTION: Council Discussion.
Area Agreement UPAA With on July 21, 1988
PREPARED BY: Elizabeth A. Newton
Washington Cou t /4
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK, 7 REQUESTED BY: Community Development
Should the City Council adopt the attached Urban Planning Area Agreement with
Washington County. The only change is the addition of Section IV. B.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached is a memo outlining issues relevant: to the Urban Planning Area
Agreement. Also attached is a resolution which, if approved, adopts the Urban
Planning Area Agreement. The agreement is attached to the resolution as
Exhibit "A". For background, a copy of the July 21, 1988 Council minutes is
provided.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
AD'
16 1. Approve the attached resolution adopting the new agreement:.
2. Terminate the agreement by not adopting the attached resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT
As outlined in the attached memo, the feasibility study required in the new
agreement will have fiscal impacts.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Approve the attached resolution adopting the new agreement.
br/8365D
n
C
Zb: Pat Reilly, City Administrator
Frain: Ed Murphy, Director of Community Developmen
Re: Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) with Washington County
Date: December 8, 1988
I. OVERVIEW:
A. Simanar . The Urban Planning Area Agreement between the City and
Washington county expired on November 8, 1988. The County Board of
Commissioners adapted a new agreement on October 25, 1988. Contained in the new
agreement is language requested by the City requiring the City and the County
to mutually study the feasibility of expanding the City's "active planning
area,, and cost effectiveness of the City providing planning and development
services to that expanded area.
B. Policy Indications. The Urban Planning Area Agreement between the
city and Washington County provides a vehicle for the two jurisdictions to
formally set forth the means by which coordination w3.thin the City's active
planning area and "area of interest" will occur. The new agreement attached, if
adapted by the City Council, will commit the City and the County to canpleting
the feasibility studied referred to above prior to t of Periodic
Review in April 1989.
C. Financial Implications. The feasibility study required in the new
agreement will involve both City and County staff time to complete. One
alternative to using existing staff resources would be using an outside
consultant funded equally by the City and the County to conduct the study. The
county staff is in the process of - Prm;n. haw extensive the study may be by
compiling information to estimate the level of planning and development
activity anticipated in the study area.
D. Recommendation. It is recamreerxled that the City Council adopt the
attzched Urban Planning Area Agreement with Washington County. It is further
recommended that staff be directed to proceed with the feasibilty study.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. Bachground. The Urban Planning Area Aunt expired on November 8,
1988. The City and County held disscussions over the course of the summer to
reach consensus on the new agreement. Due to provisions contained in the
Washington county charter, the review was limited to coordination p ocedurese
the boundaries of the "area of interest" and other minor modifications
necessary to clarify the agreement.
On July 21, 1988 the City Council met to dissaiss the Urban Planning
Area Agreement. At that meeting, city staff recommended that the entire UPAA be
opened for review and the following issues be addressed:
o adjustment of the Active Planning Area Boundary;
o review of multi-jurisdictional issues;
o determination of development standards.
In addition staff asked the Council to consider:
o Changing the Active Planning Area boundary; and
o Re-defining what the Active Ply ni ng Area boundary means.
After general discussion about issues in the Active Planning Area,
Council consensus was to pursue expanding the Active Planning Area and
redefining the scope of the Area of Interest. It was agreed that discussions
about these issues, among others should be held with the County Board of
Ca[missioners.
The Board of County Commissioners and City Council were not able to
meet prior to the expiration of the Urban Planning Area Agreement. In order to
ensure that the issues raised by the City Council would be addressed, City
staff proposed the following language4 be added to the new UPAA:
"Prior to the commencement of priodic review for the City of
Tigard and the County's Urban Areas (April, 1989), the City and
the County shall mutually study the following topics:
1. The feasibility of expanding the "active planning area" to
include the current "area of interest" and assiigning land use
planning responsibility to the City.
2. The feasibility and cost-effectiveness of the City and the
County contracting to provide building inspection and plan
review services, administer development codes and collect
related fees within the active planning area.
Proposed revisions to this agreement shall be considered by the
City and the Countyn as soon as analysis of the above topics is
cagplete, subject to the time constraint and other requirements
of the County's land use ordinance hearings and adoption process.
The County staff presented the new UPAA with the addition proposed by
City staff to the Board of Commissioners. The Board adopted the new agreement
on October 25, 1988. County and City staff have met to outline a process and
issues to be add em-sad in the feasibility study. It is anticipated that as a
-r melt of the feasibility study, otner inconsistencies contained in the UPAA
will need to be revised. Proposed revisions will be presented to Council upon
completion of the feasibility study.
B. Alternatives Considered.
Some of the options considered by staff are as follows:
1. The City Council could adopted the attached Urban Planning Area
Agreement as adopted by the Board of County Cc nnissioners . Adoption of the
4C aWNIMmIt would require the City and county to conduct a feasibility study
which would address she issues raised by City Council at the July 21, 1988
meeting. Resolution of those issues prior to catmercement of periodic review
will clearly define jurisdictional responsibilities in that effort as well as
C
provision of development services.
2. The City Council could terminate the UPAA with Washington County
by not adopting the new agreement.
The staff has determined that the best interest of the City would be
served by adopting the attached agreement. City staff would have preferred a
new agreement which addressed all of the inconsistencies found in the recently
expired agreement and more clearly defined jurisdictional responsibilities In
future planning and the provision of development services. The feasibility
study required in the new agreement however, will address those concerns.
III. CCNCI;JSICNS: Adopting the attached Urban Planning Area Agreement has
policy implications and potential flnanClal implications. The benefits to
resolving issues of concern to the Council and the future of the Tigard
community seen to support Council adoption of the agreement.
C
Councilor Johnson noted costs for services should be incorporated
in the contracts. She concurred with Councilor Eadon's remarks
concerning a change in policy.
Mayor Brian noted he also wanted the City to recover the costs
for services rendered in contract agreements. He said he would
be wi-lling to talk about the policy issue concerning dispatch
consolidation at a later time.
Councilors Schwartz and Edwards acknowledged- and. supported the
Council vote approving: the second police...dispatch,,. console
recorded at the July 18, 1988 Council meeting. Staff was directed
to proceed with the purchase of the second dispatch console.
MAYOR DISCONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN COUNCIL DISCUSSION VIA SPEAKER PHONE AT
THIS TIME.
4. COUNTY/CITY UPAA UPDATE - ACTIVE PLAN
a. Acting City Administrator advised Council (see July 18, 1988
memorandum in meeting packet) that a good understanding of the
Bull. Mountain/Walnut (BM/W) - report was critical. . Most, ,po.ss ble•_._
annexation lies in the BM/W direction and developmental pressures
were imminent there.
b. Council and the Community Development Director reviewed several
maps depicting the Urban Growth Boundary, the Active Planning
Area Boundary, and the (Primary) Area of Interest Boundary.
C. Senior Planner Newton and Community Development Director
discussed the following ideas and definitions of the different
A types of boundaries around the City of Tigard:
o Urban Growth Boundary - The boundary that identifies and
separates urbanizable land--from rural land.
Land determined to be necessary and suitable for future
urban uses.
Land that can be served by urban services and facilities.
Land that is needed for the expansion of an urban area.
o Active Planning Area - All incorporated area plus contiguous
unincorporated areas where the City conducts comprehensive
planning • and... regulates development to the greatest. .extent•.- . .
possible.
City is responsible for comprehensive planning.
City is responsible for preparation, adoption, and
amendment of a public facility plan as required by OAR
660-11.
County approval of development actions are contingent upon
' provision of adequate urban services.
Page 3 = COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 21, 1988
County will not oppose annexation into the City.
County approved developments must provide an enforceable
plan for redevelopment to urban density consistent- with
the City's Comprehensive Plan upon annexation.
4r o (Primary) Area of Interest - Unincorporated land contiguous
to active planning areas where the City does not conduct
comprehensive planning but the City maintains an interest in
comprehensive planning and development actions by the County.
. County is responsible for comprehensive planning.
County is responsible for preparation, adoption, and
amendment of a public facility plan as required by OAR
660-11.
County and City shall provide information on planning and
development actions to CPOs/NPOs.
City can not require annexation as a condition to the
provision of urban services.
City must rezone annexed land consistent with County
zoning, not to be changed for at least one year.
Community Development Director reviewed his approach to the
annexation policy issue. He advised that long-range goals should
be identified first. Community Development Director noted staff
would wait for policy direction from Council before researching
the issues more thoroughly.
Community Development Director advised that the County agreement
concerning urbanized area would expire soon. He recommended that
the entire agreement be opened for review and the following
issues addressed:
o adjustment of the Active Planning Area boundary;
o review of multi-jurisdictional issues;
o determination of development standards (who processes and
who administers).
The Active Planning Area would be a desirable designation for
those areas which are likely to choose to annex to the City; this
way, ..the- -City would- .have -an -opportunity. -to be.-involved :wUh
planning. Community Development Director asked the Council to
consider:
o Changing the Active Planning Area boundary; and
o Defining what the Active Planning Area boundary means.
Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 21, 1988
4
Community Development Director suggested that the Active Planning
Area's new definition be more aggressive than it is now.
There was general discussion about issues in the Active Planning
Area. Some of these issues included:
o Developed areas are more likely to request annexation; less
developed areas sometimes resent- annexation exploration.
o Councilor Eadon noted that transportation and drainage
issues were of concern to people in the Bull Mountain area
who have been following the issues. There was wa growing
frustration on the lack of planning in this area.
o Some areas are not paying for City services but are deriving
benefit because of their proximity.
o No one is planning for parks in the Bull Mountain area.
o Maintenance services are not being provided in some of the
more urbanized areas.
Councilor Edwards agreed to the rationale of extend.i.ng.the Active
Planning Area boundary. He reaffirmed that the City should
pursue annexation of areas for those people who have expressed a
desire to annex to the City of Tigard.
Council consensus was to pursue the Community Development
Director's proposal of expanding the area and redefining the
scope of the area of interest. This issue should be discussed
with the County Commissioners, CPO members, and the LCDC for a
procedural process check. It was suggested that the Mayor be
asked to contact County Commissioner Rogers for preliminary
discussion.
Council consensus was -that other issues previously assigned°to-
staff work programs (i.e, parks and downtown development) would
remain as higher priorities over the discussions noted above.
Council consensus was that a variety of issues should be discussed with
the County Board of Commissioners. A joint meeting scheduled in
September (the Urban Planning Area Agreement expires November 9, 1988)
would be desirable. The Mayor would be asked to discuss arrangements
for a joint meeting with Commissioner Rogers.
4. ANNEXATION POLICY DISCUSSION
a. Acting City Administrator- reviewed the annexation policies with
regard to fees. She noted that sometimes the fees pose a barrier to
those interested in annexing to the City.
Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 21, 1988
41
b. Assistant City Administrator distributed a comparison of annexation
fees. (See chart in the Council meeting packet.) Generally, those
communities actively welcoming areas into their City limits did not
charge fees and paid the Boundary Commission fees for the
developer. It was noted that once annexed, any expenditures would
be recovered over time.
After lengthy discussion, Council consensus was as follows:
o All City fees will be waived for annexation applications.
o The City will pay Boundary Commission fees for property within
the Active Planning Area.
o The City will not pay Boundary Commission fees for property
within the Area of Interest.
o Council would review this policy after one year.
o For those annexations which occurred during the 1987-88 fiscal
year, annexation fees would be refunded as follows:
Active Planning area: 50 percent of both the City and
Boundary Commission fees would be refunded by the City of
Tigard.
Outside Active Planning area: 50 percent of the City fee
would be refunded; none of the Boundary Commission fee would
be refunded. i
o For those annexations which occurred prior to 1987-88 fiscal ~
year, no refunds would be offered.
c. Acting City Administrator advised that a ordinance would be prepared
for Council consideration reflecting this change- in policy, at the
August 8, 1988 meeting.
6. ADJOURNMENT: 10:05 p.m.
i
Approved by the Tigard City Council on _ 1988.
Deputy Recorder - City of- Tigard
ATTEST:
Mayor - City of Tigard
cw/6213D
` Page 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 21, 1980
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
C
TO:
Honorable
Mayor and City Council
Respond By
FROM:
Loreen R.
n
Wilson, City Recorder 11,13
yJ"~
X For Your Information
DATE:
December
1, 1988 J
Sign and Return
SUBJECT:
November
8, 1988 General Election Results
- Tigard Issues
The City is now in receipt of the official election results from the
November 8, 1988 General Election. 80.4 percent of the registered voters in
Washington County turned out to vote, with 78.9 percent of the 16,897
registered voters in the City of Tigard voting.
TOTAL COUNT RESULTS
NOVEMBER 8, 1988 ELECTION
ISSUE TOTAL % BASED ON YES/NO % BASED ON
VOTES BALLOTS CAST TOTAL BALLOTS
MEASURE 34-5
Maj. Streets Traffic Imp. Bond
YES 7,325 59.64% 54.94%
41 NO 4,958 40.36% 37.19%
Over Votes 6 .05%
Under Votes 1,043 7.82%
MAYOR POSITION
Gerald (Jerry) Edwards 7,501 N/A 56.26%
Over Votes -0- -0-%
Under Votes 5,831 43.74%
COUNCIL POSITION #1
Edward A. Egging 1,169 17% 8.77%
Joe Kasten 3,324 49% 24.93%
Mark Padgett 2,333 34% 17.50%
Over Votes 208 1.56%
Under Votes 6,098 47.24%
COUNCIL POSITION #2
Valerie A. Johnson 6,990 N/A 52.43%
Over Votes -0- -0--%
Under Votes 6,342 47.57%
As you will note, there was a higher than normal under vote this year. This
is due in part -:.-o the presidential election being held at the same time.
Further precinct breakdown information is available in my office, should you
wish to study the results in more detail.
4g lw/8220D
3, CL .
a
C
3.4-( b.
Community Development Department
October, 1988 Report
TO: Pat Reilly, City Administrator December 9, 1988
FROM: Ed Murphy, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: October, 1988 Report
I. BOARDS AND COMMITTEES
A. Parks and Recreation Board
On October 18, 1988, the Park and Recreation Board viewed a
presentation by Murase and Associates, the Master Plan consultant.
Recommendations for first priority improvements to the three
city-wide parks were presented. There was consensus on the
consultant's recommendations by the Board. In addition, the Board
discussed possible park path projects that may be included in a
levy recommendation to the City Council. Staff received direction
from the Park Board to compile a list of cost estimates for
projects to be included in the levy proposal.
AW'
B. City Center Plan Task Force
On October 6, 1988, the City Center Plan Task Force and the
Transportation Advisory Committee met jointly to review various
options for routing traffic through the City Center study area.
After a presentation by Wayne Kittleson, the transportation
consultant, some options were dismissed from further consideration.
On October 13, 1988, the City Center Plan Task Force held a
workshop with the design consultants to consider design concepts
for the study area. Two alternatives presented were favored for
further study.
The Task Force met in a joint meeting with the Parks and Recreation
Board on October 18 to review recommendations for Phase I
improvements to Fanno Creek Park. A consensus was reached that
Phase I improvements should be concentrated at the Main Street end
of Fanno Creek Park.
On October 20, 1988, the Task Force met with the design team to
review design concepts for the study area. The "Burnham Ash"
alternative was preferred over others presented. The Task Force
emphasized, however, that future options for light rail should be
accommodated. In addition, the Task Force discussed possible
improvement projects that could be undertaken to facilitate private
investment in the study area.
A
- 1 -
II. DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
A. Current Planning
This section issued 9 administrative decisions in October. In
addition, three Comprehensive Plan Amendments/Zone Changes, one
Sign Code Exception, and two Sensitive Lands Permit requests were
reviewed through public hearings by the Council, Planning
Commission, or Hearings Officer with assistance from the Planning
section staff.
Development applications are still being reviewed at a
consistent rate. Currently pending are five development proposals
that would add 558 apartment units and one 26 lot single family
residential subdivision.
In order to implement the sign amortization program, the staff
is continuing to meet with business and property owners to bring
nonconforming signage into compliance. At present, four Sign Code
Exception or Variance applications to retain existing signs are
pending.
B. Building Permits
Residential housing starts for the first time this fiscal year
exceeded that of the same period for last year (October, 1988 28
new SFD; October, 1987 24 new SFD).
Commercial activities continue to be strong (October, 1988
26 permits; October, 1987 23 permits).
Building Permits
X
Single Family Permits
Multi Family Permits
Commercial/Industrial
Value SFD
Commercial
Other
FY 88-89
28
-0-
1
2,039,814
3,304,000
1,558,431
FY 87-88
24
-0-
1
1,800,306
4,117,772
1,156,149
Total Value 6,902,245 7,074,227
C. Engineering Services
Five public improvement project construction plans are
approvable and can be issued once fees are paid: Brittany Square
No. 4 (value $108,000), Franklin Street (value $5,400), Locust
Street (value $4,400), Tigard Park (value $167,000), Upper Boones
Ferry Road (value $7,500). The total public improvement value of
above mentioned "ready to issue" projects is $292,300.
The public improvement permit for Morning Hill Addition (value
$10,500) was just issued and work has commenced. PacTrust received
permit(s) for public street and storm sewer improvement work at the
west end of Kable Lane and, also, another for street and utilities
improvement work along the west side of 72nd Avenue at Upper Boones
(total value $36,400). Key Bank received a permit for public
improvement culvert work at 72nd Avenue, between Baylor Street and
Villa Ridge Way, and for street and sewer work at their
68th Avenue/Parkway site, south of Pacific Highway (total value
$11,500). Work was immediately initiated at the PacTrust and Key
Bank permit locations. The total value of above mentioned "just
issued" projects is $47,900.
- 2 -
It is now apparent that with the onset of inclement weather,
the present construction trend is for permit applicants to only
initiate small jobs, usually in support of a given commercial use
development site; large scale work, such as subdivision
development, is nearly dormant.
There are now thirty-three improvement projects in the
construction performance stage (total value $4,066,778), twenty-one
improvement projects in the maintenance stage (total value
$3,177,298) and fifty-four "open" Street Opening Permit projects
(total value $397,529).
III. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
A. Wastewater
In the month of October, Wastewater crews installed 80 feet of
15-inch CMP on 100th near Sattler to complete a drainage project
related to the Murdock Hill drainage easement vacation. Forty feet
of 12-inch CMP on 95th Street completed two sanitary sewer repairs
on Riverwood Lane.
Inspected 2,814 feet and cleaned 5,252 feet of sanitary
sewer. Cleaned 11,680 feet of storm sewer pipe, and 3,006 feet of
open ditch digging and cleaning was completed.
B. Parks
Three hundred seventeen (317) man hours were spent on turf
mowing, and 166 hours on the Summer Lake renovation.
Construction of the storage shed at Cook Park is completed.
One hundred sixty-two (162) hours of community service work
were received.
C. Streets
Street marking program was completed, utilizing 156 gallons of
traffic paint. Nand brushing program started in October and will
continue through February.
Patching program used 13 tons of asphalt.
D. Shops
Emphasis was made to keep Police vehicles serviced and on line.
Public works vehicles are all in service but repaired only on
an as-need basis, due to the fact that one mechanic terminated his
employment with the City.
E. Building Maintenance
Twenty-eight RFAs were completed for the month of October,
which included moving furniture and boxes over to the Chamber o."
Commerce building, changed filters in A/C units, helped PD with
some remodeling, moved office furniture around for various
departments at Civic Center, and performed janitorial services
daily.
IV. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
A. Greenburg/Tiedeman intersection: New signals placed in operation
11-3-88. ODOT has agreed to review signal timing on Greenburg at
217, to reduce backups and better coordinate with the Tiedeman
signal.
- 3 -
B.
Greenburg/Ash Creek bridge: Construction is slightly ahead of
C
schedule. The portion of the work most likely to cause traffic
delays is completed.
C.
Pavement Overlays: All scheduled work was completed in October.
D.
Hillview Street Storm Drainage: All work is complete except for
E.
some minor cleanup.
135th Avenue LID: Construction was running ahead of schedule in
October but had to stop until the telephone company completed
removal of overhead lines. Telephone poles were removed November
15. Paving will now be completed as soon as we get a few dry days.
F.
Dartmouth LID: Attorney's office is proceeding with right-of-way
acquisition.
G.
79th Avenue Streetlighting LID: Streetlights were installed
10-28-88.
H.
Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study: County experienced
some problems with the traffic projection program. We expect to
have those problems resolved soon and be ready for neighborhood
meetings in early January. (CPO requested no meetings in December,
as attendance would likely be poor during the holiday season.)
I.
Road Bond: Staff is preparing a schedule for implementing the road
bond. The schedule will be presented for review by Transportation
Advisory Committee and Council in early December.
J.
Scholls Ferry Road: It appears that the next ODOT public hearing
on the Scholls Ferry Road widening project will be scheduled for
January.
1C
br/3741P
- 4 -
Adr~
it,
2
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: December 19, 1988__ DATE SUBMITTED: December 12, 1988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Mielnik /PREPARED ,PREVIOUS ACTION: Council Denial
7 1!
12/5/88 Meeting
CPA 58-24/ZC 88-10
BY: Keith Liden
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK i REQUESTED BY:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On December 5, 1988, the Council denied a request for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and Zone Change for Mielnik, and staff was directed to prepare a
resolution.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve the attached resolution.
2. Modify and approve the attached resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adopt the attached resolution.
br/8397D
A
3
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Awl
AGENDA OF: December 19 1988 PATE SUBMITTED: December 12, 1988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Key Bank PREVIOUS ACTION: Council Approval
TU 10-86/V 88-31 12/5/88 Meeting
PREPARED BY: Keith Liden
DEPT HEAD 0 CITY ADMIN OIG' REQUESTED BY:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On December 5, 1988, the Council approved the extension of a Temporary Use for
Key Bank and staff was directed to prepare a resolution.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve the attached resolution.
2. Modify and approve the attached resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adopt the attached resolution.
br/8397D
it
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
AW~ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: December 19, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 9-1-1 Cost of PREVIOUS ACTION:
Services Agreement
3:?
December 12, 1988
J. Reil
')PREPARED BY: Patr
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
PO CY ISSUE
Should the City enter into an agreement based on cost of services for Basic
9-1-1 with the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District?
«o
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Agreement has been modified to assure district payment of at least 90% of the
stated 9-1-1 receipts distributed to the City. The not to exceed cap of 100%
has been retained. Also section 4.2 has been modified from original draft, in
order to provide an impasse resolution. District would provide for a lower
minimum if maximum would be adjusted accordingly (e.g. 80-110% instead of
90-100%.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve agreement.
2. Reject concept of agreement.
3. Delay action pending.
FISCAL IMPACT
City has possibility of saving $7000 by agreeing to a cost of service payment
and has accepted no risk of paying more than we receive.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of agreement.
mh8384D
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
4r RESOLUTION NO. 88-
A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RATIFYING AN AGREEMENT FOR 9-1-1
SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TIGARD AND THE TUALATIN RURAL FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard desires to contract with the Tualatin Rural Fire
Protection District on a cost for services basis for the provision of 9-1-1
services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard and the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District
mutually agree to the terms of the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
Section 1: The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District will provide to_the
City of Tigard 9-1-1 services as detailed in the Agreement for
9-1-1 Services which is attached and referenced as Exhibit "A".
Section 2: The Mayor and City Recorder are hereby authorized to sign the
city of Tigard/Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District
Agreement on behalf of the City of Tigard, and the Recorder is
further directed to file a copy of said Agreement with the
Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District.
PASSED: This day of
ATTEST:
Deputy Recorder - City of Tigard
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Recorder
Date
mh8379D
0
. 1988.
Mayor - City of Tigard
RESOLUTION N0. 88-
Page 1
AGREEMENT FOR 9-1-1 SERVICES
THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and
between the City of Tigard (Tigard), a municipal corporation of the State of
Oregon, and the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District (the District), a
municipal corporation of the State of Oregon.
WHEREAS, Tigard and the District have completed a mutual Cost-of-Services
Study for Basic 9-1-1 Services and a methodology for costing future services;
WHEREAS, Tigard desires to contract with the District on a Cost-of-Services
basis for the provision of 9-1-1 services; and
WHEREAS, the District is agreeable to rendering such services on a
Cost-of-Services basis per the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, such contracts are authorized and provided for under ORS 190.010 et
seq.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants herein
contained, and contingent upon acceptance by all contractors of 9-1-1
services, it is mutually agreed as follows:
1.0 DUTIES OF THE DISTRICT REGARDING 9-1-1 CALLS
1.1 The District shall provide a 24 hour primary PSAP Basic 9-1-1 Center
with sufficient labor and supervision to receive and transfer to the
Tigard Police Dispatch Center 9-1-1 calls requesting police services
within the corporate limits of Tigard; and to receive and dispatch or
transfer to an appropriate dispatch center for dispatch 9-1-1 calls
requesting fire and medical services within the corporate limits of
Tigard.
1.2 The District shall operate and maintain telephone and other equipment
and supplies as may be necessary to provide primary 9-1-1 services to
Tigard.
1.3 The District shall promptly transfer to Tigard any and all 9-1-1
calls requesting police services; and promptly dispatch or transfer
to an appropriate dispatch center for dispatch any and all 9-1-1
calls requesting fire or medical services.
1.4 The District shall promptly conference call with Tigard 9-1-1 calls
that require a mutual police and fire and/or medical response.
1.5 The District shall maintain a log and report on a monthly basis: all
9-1-1 calls received; all "held" 9-1-1 calls (including mental
health, poison center, etc.); all 9-1-1 calls transferred to the
Tigard Dispatch Center; and all 9-1-1 fire/EMS calls for the City of
Tigard.
41
1 - AGREEMENT FOR 9-1-1 SERVICES
1.6 The District shall provide telephone lock and ring back capability
for purposes of telephone trace to identify telephone numbers and
addresses for emergency purposes when requested by the Tigard
Dispatch Center. The District shall notify the City in the event of
any planned configuration changes relative to GTE service for
ringback and telephone locks.
1.7 The District shall retain control of the rendition of 9-1-1 Primary
PSAP Services, the standards of performance, the discipline of 9-1-1
personnel, and other matters incident to 9-1-1 services.
1.8 All persons employed in the performance of 9-1-1 Primary PSAP
services and functions pursuant to this agreement shall be District
employees. No person employed in the performance of 9-1-1 Primary
PSAP Services shall have any Tigard salary, pension, or other status
or rights under the provisions of Tigard employment practices or
policies.
1.9
Tigard shall not be responsible for any salaries, wages, or any other
compensation due to injury or sickness of any District employee.
2.0
DUTIES OF TIGARD REGARDING 9-1-1 CALLS
2.1
Tigard shall provide the District's 9-1-1 center with a description
of the corporate boundaries of the City of Tigard and shall
immediately advise the District's 9-1-1 center concerning any change
in such boundaries.
2.2
Tigard shall provide and maintain at its own expense adequate
telephone equipment to receive transferred 9-1-1 calls from the
District's 9-1-1 center to Tigard's Police Dispatch Center.
2.3
Tigard shall provide and maintain at its own expense adequate
telephone equipment on a seven digit telephone number for the
handling of non-emergency telephone requests for police services
directed to Tigard and to conduct normal business.
2.4 Tigard shall furnish and supply all labor, supervision, equipment,
and supplies necessary to maintain and carry out the duties of Tigard
as herein described.
2.5 Tigard shall maintain a log of all 9-1-1 calls received from the
District at the Tigard Dispat_h Center, detailing the city of origin
of each 9-1-1 calls and shall make the log available to the District
on a monthly basis.
f
2 - AGREEMENT FOR 9-1-1 SERVICES
3.0 ADVISORY COMMITTEE
•
3.1 An Intergovernmental Advisory Committee shall be established by the
District with representatives from each jurisdiction receiving 9-1-1
service.
This committee shall be responsible for assisting in the
establishment and review of operating procedures relating to 9-1-1
service; establishing plans, addressing technical, operational, and
financial concerns to promote the most cost effective service; and
establishing public education programs for use of the 9-1-1 system;
and approving recommendations for equipment upgrades, procedure
changes or upgrades to the level of service.
4.0
DISPUTES
4.1
Disputes or conflicts regarding the provision of 9-1-1 services which
cannot be handled at the City Designee/9-1-1 Center Director level
shall be resolved by mutual agreement of the Chiefs of the Tigard
Police Department and the Tualatin Fire Protection District.
4.2
Disputes or conflicts regarding the provisions of 9-1-1 services
-
of the
which cannot be resolved by mutual agreement of the Chief's
Tigard Police Department and the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection
District shall be submitted to the governing bodies of the City and
the District who shall mediate the issue. The governing bodies may
agree to utilize a neutral third party to facilitate the resolution
of any dispute or contract.
5.0
PAYMENT
5.1 The District will charge and Tigard will pay $5.47 for each 9-1-1
call transferred to Tigard Dispatch Center for police dispatch within
the corporate limits of Tigard, for each 9-1-1 call dispatched by the
District or transferred to an appropriate dispatch center for
dispatch for fire or medical services within the corporate limits of
Tigard; and for a proportional share of the total "held" calls based
on the proportion of calls transferred to Tigard Dispatch for police
calls within the corporate limits of Tigard and the calls dispatched
or transferred to another agency for dispatch for fire or medical
services within the corporate limits of Tigard compared to the total
calls requiring dispatch by any PSAP served by the District's 9-1-1
Center.
5.2 In no case shall the quarterly payment for 9-1-•1 services exceed or
be less than 90 percent of the dollar amount of the quarterly 9-1-1
receipts of the state collected and distributed 9-1-1 funds
distributed to the City.
5.3 Payment for this service will be made on a quarterly basis within 10
working days after the disbursement of state collected 9-1-1 funds
and upon receipt by Tigard of the District's 9-1-1 log as described
by 1.5 above for the quarter for which payment is to be made. The
first payment is to be made at the end of the first quarter after the
effective date of this agreement. The District shall not disrupt
9-1-1 service for Tigard's failure to pay without 30 days written
notice.
3 - AGREEMENT FOR 9-1-1 SERVICES
5.4 Any costs associated with the upgrade of equipment, changes in
procedure or upgrades in level of service approved by the Advisory
Committee shall be the responsibility of the governmental entities
receiving the benefit. The share of costs shall be determined by the
Advisory Board based on the total 9-1-1 calls as determined in 5.1 of
this agreement.
6.0 HOLD HARMLESS
de ce«ct 0'A'd
6.1 The District hereby covenants and agreesA to hold and save Tigard, its
officers, employees, and agents harmless from all claims whatsoever
that may arise against Tigard, its officers, employees, or agents by
reason of any act of the District, its officers, employees, or agents
in the performance of the duties required by the terms of this
agreement.
6.2 Tigard hereby covenants and agrees4to hold and save the District, its
officers, employees, and agents harmless from all claims whatsoever
that may arise against the District, its officers, employees, or
agents by reason of any act of Tigard, its officers, employees, or
agents in the performance of the duties required by the terms of this
agreement.
6.3 The District and Tigard mutually covenant and agree that neither
party will insure the actions of the other, but rather each party
will assume its own responsibility in connection with any claims made
by a third party against the District and/or Tigard.
6.4 The District and Tigard agree that nothing contained in this
agreement is intended to limit the remedy, if any, of either party
against the ether party, including claims under subrogation
agreements with the party's insurance carrier to recover for damages
to property or injury to persons caused by a party's negligence.
7.0 EFFECTIVE DATE AND RIGHT TO TERMINATE
7.1 The District and Tigard agree that this agreement shall be effective
for a period of 12 months, commencing at 12:01 a.m. on the first day
of July 1988, and expiring at MIDNIGHT on the last day of June 1989.
In the event that either party desires to renew this contract upon
the expiration thereof, the party so desiring shall notify the other
party at least one hundred and eighty (180) days prior to expiration
of the agreement. Within ninety (90) days after receipt of such
notice, the parties shall review the compensation and any other
provisions hereof, and agree to renew the agreement as it may be
modified. If agreement cannot be reached, the contract will
terminate as provided above.
7.2 This agreement may be terminated by either party without cause upon
ninety (90) days prior written notice.
NL
4 - AGREEMENT FOR 9-1-1 SERVICES
A
OREGON
December 30, 1988
Ms. Diane Brandt
WCCA
14490 S.W. Jenkins Road
Beaverton, OR 97005
Re: 9-1-1 Agreement - TRFPD & City of Tigard
Dear Ms. Brandt:
As we discussed on the telephone today, enclosed is a replacement page for
Page 3 of the above-referenced agreement which was forwarded to you on
December 20, 1988. You'll note in section 5.2 the words "100 percent" have
been added per the City's intent and understanding. City Attorney Tim Ramis
advised this was clearly a scrivener's error and should have been inserted.
Thank you for advising that the Board would be considering the Agreement at
their January 11, 1989 meeting. If you have any questions, please give me a
call.
Sincerely,
GL~ U
Catherine Wheatley
Deputy Recorder
cw/8597D
Enclosures
c: Pat Reilly, City Administrator
David Lehr, Chief of Police
11
13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
3.0 ADVISORY COMMITTEE
1.1 An Intergovernmental Advisory Committee shall be established by the
District with representatives from each jurisdiction receiving 9-1-1
service.
This committee shall be responsible for assisting in the
establishment and review of operating procedures relating to 9-1-1
service; establishing plans, addressing technical, operational, and
financial concerns to promote the most cost effective service; and
establishing public education programs for use of the 9-1-1 system;
and approving recommendations for equipment upgrades, procedure
changes or upgrades to the level of service.
4.0 DISPUTES
4.1 Disputes or conflicts regarding the provision of 9-1-1 services which
cannot be handled at the City Designee/9-1-1 Center Director level
shall be resolved by mutual agreement of the Chiefs of the Tigard
Police Department and the Tualatin Fire Protection District.
4.2 Disputes or conflicts regarding the provisions .of 9-1-1 services
which cannot be resolved by mutual agreement of the Chiefs of the
Tigard Police Department and the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection
District shall be submitted to the governing bodies of the City and
the District who shall mediate the issue. The governing bodies may
agree to utilize a neutral third party to facilitate the resolution
of any dispute or contract.
5.0 PAYMENT
5.1 The District will charge and Tigard will pay $5.47 for each 9-1-1
call transferred to Tigard Dispatch Center for police dispatch within
the corporate limits of Tigard, for each 9-1-1 call dispatched by the
District or transferred to an appropriate dispatch center for
dispatch for fire or medical services within the corporate limits of
Tigard; and for a proportional share of the total "held" calls based
on the proportion of calls transferred to Tigard Dispatch for police
calls within the corporate limits of Tigard and the calls dispatched
or transferred to another agency for dispatch for fire or medical
services within the corporate limits of Tigard compared to the total
calls requiring dispatch by any PSAP served by the District's 9-1-1
Center.
5.2 In no case shall the quarterly payment for 9-1-1 services exceed 100
percent nor shall said payment be less than 90 percent of the dollar
amount of the quarterly 9-1-1 receipts of the state collected and
distributed 9-1-1 funds distributed to the City.
5.3 Payment for this service will be made on a quarterly basis within 10
working days after the disbursement of state collected 9-1-1 funds
and upon receipt by Tigard of the District's 9-1-1 log as described
by 1.5 above for the quarter for which payment is to be made. The
first payment is to be made at the end of the first quarter after the
effective date of this agreement. The District shall not disrupt
9-1-1 service for Tigard's failure to pay without 30 days written
notice.
3 - AGREEMENT FOR 9'-1-1 SERVICES
C "•ZEMMf~ Z)btvl
CiTZ Ol' = lGA: . 01 CAit)f+
O: Nat Reilly. I:ity A.drr:ir,istrator Respond
r
. Lehr Chief of Police 1;1 _._ror Your Information
:~,vM: David ~ -
DA1'E: December 22. i968 Si(xn and Return
SU1 jE T : 9--1-1 Aureemenr_ :_,ecr ion 7:5.
While reviewing Uke 9-1-1 agreement I riot:Lce-d that section J.G reads. ''in no
case shall the quarterly paymenu f c•] -1 sere _ r es es:(::eed no)- shall said
Ixtvluent be less than 90 pei -IT. of the .-loth-r :~Ina~u'It of 1-he quat-trrly
receipts of the state coliectea Lilt: tl tStr']Y?U.CeCI 9-1--1 f,krids dlstribut.ea to
the city. " The imvl iccation this section appears to be that we pay yt)
uercent of the State coile•_ted arld ciistributea 9-i-i funds as a maximum and a
minimum payment r'~a',]dless Of the actual cost. 'bile provision as now written
seems to negate Section 5.1 and there_tore the concept of a cost or services
agreement. Although I also ,e i i eve thc..t a 40% (n.lara nteed minimum. pay wren t
also ne-crates the roncept of a cost of services agreement. but that is not at
issue any longer given the agr Bement. for the Inirr]milm payment at. 90%
in light of ray negot'!.atfon,:, witrl olane Bra!-t6t, of the Fire District, and our
previous conversat.1.ons regarding this issue. I wonder ii this wordim
reflects our intent.. it wouia appe~u- that. the provision. as now written,
would work to our advantage and I have no problem with the lanrnrage if it
truly rejects our necrotiations with the Fire District. If it does not it
would seem that trl? worcjs "1.00 should appear- after the word... "exceed" in
the first ilne of tna section.
would appreciate yo1]r clarification of this issue for our own Our poses and
as I am in the process of assisting the City of Durham in their negotiation
of their 9-1-1. contract with the Fire bistrict anti would expect that the
lanctuaae in their ,contract rerlect the language in ours, the clarification
would lDe helpful.
nn,,~~ j / c..6tz,rtC . s•'ri~'~ ' p-r of
,.~-'~~tJ~ /0 0 CIO /h-B'r' ~l.~l~ /,1.11i.~cL, .;h~,rnu~ •`~f ~'~~a-a- f~J~n✓
f~, tjd ,s(1-;tee.. e.,~.~6._.f~ ~7Lv ✓/.~a~v~ `7~ur.~ ,Q-~^..~
3.0 ADVISORY COMMITTEE
3.1 An Intergovernmental Advisory Committee shall be established by the
District with representatives from each jurisdiction receiving 9-1-1
service.
This committee shall be responsible for assisting in the
establishment and review of operating procedures relating to 9-1-1
service; establishing plans, addressing technical, operational, and
financial concerns to promote the most cost effective service; and
establishing public education programs for use of the 9-1-1 system;
and approving recommendations for equipment upgrades, procedure
changes or upgrades to the level of service.
4.0
DISPUTES
4.1
Disputes or conflicts regarding the provision of 9-1-1 services which
cannot be handled at the City Designee/9-1-1 Center Director level
shall be resolved by mutual agreement of the Chiefs of the Tigard
Police Department and the Tualatin Fire Protection District.
4.2
Disputes or conflicts regarding the provisions of 9-1-1 services
which cannot be resolved by mutual agreement of the Chiefs of the
Tigard Police Department and the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection
District shall be submitted to the governing bodies of the City and
the District who shall mediate the issue. The governing bodies may
agree to utilize a neutral third party to facilitate the resolution
of any dispute or contract.
5.0
PAYMENT
5.1
The District will charge and Tigard will pay $5.47 for each 9-1-1
call transferred to Tigard Dispatch Center for police dispatch within
the corporate limits of Tigard, for each 9-1-1 call dispatched by the
District or transferred to an appropriate dispatch center for
dispatch for fire or medical services within the corporate limits of
Tigard; and for a proportional share of the total "held" calls based
on the proportion of calls transferred to Tigard Dispatch for police.
calls within the corporate limits of Tigard and the calls dispatched
or transferred to another agency for dispatch for fire or medical
services within the corporate limits of Tigard compared to the total
calls requiring dispatch by any PSAP served by the District's 9-1-1
Center.
5.2
In no case shall the quarterly payment for 9-1-1 services exceed nor
shall said payment be less than 90 percent of the dollar amount of
the quarterly 9-1-1 receipts of the state collected and distributed
9-1-1 funds distributed to the City.
5.3 Payment for this service will be made on a quarterly basis within 10
working days after the disbursement of state collected 9-1-1 funds
and upon receipt by Tigard of the District's 9-1-1 log as described
by 1.5 above for the quarter for which payment is to be made. The
first payment is to be made at the end of the first quarter after the
effective date of this agreement. The District shall not disrupt
9-1-1 service for Tigard's failure to pay without 30 days written
notice.
3 - AGREEMENT FOR 9-1-1 SERVICES
} ~ Z f-v rr, 3 , d
CITY OF TIGARE OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA.ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: AGENDA r19, 19,^8 6 DATE SUBMI"TSUBMITTED: December 6 1988
ISSUE/AGENDA "TITLE: Recommendation PREVIOUS ACTION:
for Copy Equipment I,REpARLD BY, Sherrie Burbank
y
DEP TED BY : Jill Monle I~
>T HEAD 0 CI"( 'Y ADMT.IU REQUE.~
PO ICY ISSUE
LCRB action on expenditure of over $15,000 for copy related equipment.
INFORMATION SUMMARY G
In order to provide needed copy support services we recommend purchase of 3
new copy machines and a fax machine.
i
At this time the City owns four copiers which are located at different sites
throughout the organization. Two of these copiers are well worn andyare
requiring heavy maintenance. In addition, the combined copy capabilit of
these machines does not meet the City's current copying demands.
$20,000 was approved in the budget: for purchase of new copy equipment. This
is in addition to $9,000 budgeted for the year in ongoing maintenance costs.
An in-house study was conducted to examine the City's needs. Proposals were
solicited and alternatives of lease, purchase, refurbish, or some combination
thereof were examined.
The purchase/refurbish arrangement will allow us to meet primary printing
needs in terms of quality and speed. The initial cost of $17,475 will allow
purchase of: Cancan NP-8570 Main Production
Canon NP-4035 Engineering/Planning
Canon NP-20155 Public Works Operations
In addition, we propose purchase of a Canon FAX-350 machine for $2,695.
Trade--in allowance on the two copiers we plan to excess is $300 which will be
deducted at the time of purchase.
The above equipment: should meet our copying needs as we now understand them
for the next 3 years. There is a question about Police Department needs. For
this reason, we are not recommending any new equipment; rather, we are
placing an existing refurbished high volume, high quality machine in the
department. This will be monitored over time to assure that Police needs are
met.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Lease
2. Purchase
3. Refurbish existing equipment
4. Combination of any of the above
FISCAL_ 1MPAGT
Initial cost will be $20,180 for equipment acquisition and upgrade. Fst
maintenance will be $2,300. Subsequent maintenance will be $9,000 per year
for all City copy equipment.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends Alternative 4 which would combine purchasing new equipment
and refurbishing some existing equipment.
dc/8285D
1
THREE YEAR COMPARISON OF NEW COPIER COSTS: LEASE VS PURCHASE
Copier Package
(Canon NP8570, NP4035 & NP2015S)
Maintenance
(Includes copy volume up to
maximum of 63,000/mo - any
excess charged separately)
TOTAL COST OVER 3 YEARS
Lease w/Purchase Option Purchase
(at lease close)
$22,875 $17,475
$25,776 $23,994
$48,651
$41,469
Notes: o We investigated outright rental of similar equipment but found
vendors unable to rent any copy equipment for more than a 1-3
month basis.
o The above maintenance prices are available under the state's
government pricing package. The purchase cost is Canon's
government rate.
o Maintenance is less under the purchase option because the new
equipment is under warranty for the first 120-180 days (time
varies with copier). Therefore, we don't need to cover the
equipment under a maintenance agreement until that warranty
expires.
dc/8285D
1-1
11
A
C br/8344D
AGENDA OF: December 19, 1988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Request for
Closure of North Dakota Street in
Anton Pa' Mi,
DE
DATE SUBMITTED: December 8, 1988
PREVIOUS ACTION:
PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woolen
_ REQUESTED BY:
ICY ISSUE
Residents of Anton Park have petitioned for closure of S.W. North Dakota
Street at the north edge of Anton Park.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
INFORMATION SUMMARY
In November, the Council received a written report from the City Engineer
regarding a request for closure of North Dakota Street in Anton Park. An
additional copy of that report is attached. Also attached is a supplement to
the City Engineer's report.
Discussion of the street closure request was deferred to the December 19th
meeting at the request of the Anton Park property owners. Property owners
have indicated that they would like to discuss this matter with the Council on
the 19th.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Direct staff to prepare the necessary documents and schedule appropriate
hearings to begin the formal process for closing the street, including
revisions to the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Deny the request for street closure.
FISCAL IMPACT
Closing the street would increase the need for traffic capacity improvements
on other streets.
SUGGESTED ACTION
City Engineer and Police Chief recommend denial of the request for street
closure. Alternative safety measures were recommended in the November report
from the City Engineer.
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT REGARDING
IC TRAFFIC CONCERNS ON S.W. NORTH DAKOTA STREET
WEST OF 121ST AVENUE
Comprehensive Plan
Page 2 of my original report states that the Comprehensive Plan Transportation
Map does not call for connection of North Dakota Street between Springwood
Drive and Scholls Ferry Road. However, information has been located which
suggests that I may not have correctly interpreted the intent of the plan. In
1984 the City Engineer and the Planning Director, in their comments on
SDR 22-84 (Meadowcreek Apartments), both indicated that the Comprehensive Plan
called for a minor collector street connection of North Dakota Street with
Sorrento Road (now 125th Avenue) at Scholls Ferry Road. Both of these
gentlemen had been involved in the development of the Comprehensive Plan which
was adopted in 1983. Therefore, their interpretation of the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan is no doubt more accurate than my interpretation.
Additional Meetings
On November 22, 1988, the City Engineer and the Police Chief met with
representatives of Anton Park to discuss the staff recommendations and options
available to the property owners.
The Anton Park property owners are scheduled to discuss their proposal with
NPO #7 at the regular NPO meeting on December 14th. The Transportation
Advisory Committee was advised of the street closure request in October and
will be updated of the status of the request at the regular Transportation
Advisory Committee meeting on December 8th. Anv recommendations of the NPO or
the TAC will be presented to the Council on December 19th.
Procedure
Some questions have arisen regarding the procedure for Council review of the
Anton Park request for a street closure. The item before the Council on the
December 19th agenda is discussion of a staff report to the Council in
response to the earlier petition from the Anton Park property owners. The
item on December 19th is not a formal public hearing.
Following discussion on the 19th, if the Council wishes to formally consider
revising the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map to allow closure of North
Dakota Street, the appropriate action would be to direct staff to initiate the
Comprehensive Plan revision. This would begin the formal process of NPO
review, a Planning Commission public hearing, and a public hearing before the
City Council. Alternatively, the Council could require that the property
owners initiate the Comprehensive Plan revision and pay the associated
application fees.
Should the Council decide not to consider any revision to the Comprehensive
Plan, no formal action is required; however, it may be desirable to document
the Council's decision in the form of a motion denying the petition request.
Should the Council decide to deny the petition request, staff has
it,
ANTON PARK REPORT - Page 1
recommended some subsequent Council actions, including adoption of additional
truck restrictions, some general policies for future City actions, and some
potential traffic engineering revisions to North Dakota Street. The proposed
truck restrictions are before the Council in the form of an ordinance on the
December 19th agenda. Council consensus on the policy statements would be
adequate direction to staff in pursuing these policies. If Council concurs
that traffic engineering revisions should be considered, staff would meet
again with the property owners to work out the details of the proposed
revisions and return later with any items requiring formal Council approval.
Submitted December 8, 1988
By:
Randall R. Wooley, City Engine
br/8342D
C
ANTON PARK REPORT - Page 2
TRAFFIC CONCERNS ON S.W. NORTH DAKOTA STREET
WEST OF 121ST AVENUE
C
Concerns of Residents:
During the past year, we have received many calls and letters from
residents of S.W. North Dakota Street in the Anton Park Subdivision west of
121st Avenue. The residents have been concerned about traffic volumes and
traffic speeds along S.W. North Dakota Street. They have been especially
concerned about the through traffic which is occurring in their neighborhood.
On February 11, 19£3£3, the City Engineer and Police Chief met with the
Anton Park residents to discuss their concerns and possible solutions. As a
result of that meeting, additional directed police traffic patrols were
implemented, revisions were made to traffic signing, and a Neighborhood Watch
Group was formed in the Anton Park neighborhood. We had also agreed to
suggest to the Council a prohibition on through truck traffic on North Dakota
Street.
In April,
a petition was submitted signed by many residents of the
neighborhood. The petition requests that North Dakota Street be closed
permanently at a
point immediately north of Anton Park. Under this proposal,
the Anton Park
area could be reached only from 121st Avenue and the areas
north of Anton
Park would be reached only from Scholls Ferry Road. This
proposal would eliminate all through traffic on S.W. North Dakota Street west
of 121st Avenue.
The Council received and filed the petition, with further
consideration to
be given to the request upon completion of staff review. The
petitioners were
told that staff would review the requests and report back to
Council as soon
as the workload permitted and that staff would not be able to
give immediate attention to this request.
Engineering and Police staff have now completed a review of the request
and options. Comments have been received from other concerned agencies.
Page -1-
Attachment 1 is a copy of the resident's petition and includes a map
showing the proposed location of street closure.
Comprehensive Plan
The City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map, adopted in 1983,
provides for the extension of North Dakota Street in the Anton Park vicinity.
Attachment 2 shows the relevant portion of the Comprehensive Plan
Transportation Map. The map calls for North Dakota Street to be extended
westerly from 121st, turning northward to Springwood Drive. The plan also
calls for Springwood Drive to be extended westerly from 121st Avenue into the
adjoining residential area west of North Dakota Street. The plan does not
call for the North Dakota Street connection between Springwood Drive and
Scholls Ferry Road.
In 1984 the City received development proposals to construct the 304 unit
Meadow Creek Apartments complex and also for development of the Anton Park
Subdivision. Both projects were expected to develop their respective portions
of the collector street system for the neighborhood.
During site development review for the Meadow Creek Apartment complex, it
was decided that North Dakota Street shoLIld be connected to Scholls Ferry Road
at SW 125th Avenue. The site development review approval specifically
requires the developer to construct the North Dakota Street connection to
Scholls Ferry Road. No provision was made for the westerly extension of
Springwood Drive. The apartment complex has subsequently been completed in
accordance with the site development approval; it is no longer possible to
extend Springwood Drive west from 121st without significantly modifying the
apartment complex.
The Anton Park Subdivision was also approved with the provision for North
Dakota Street to be extended from 121st to connect with the portion of North
Dakota constructed by the Meadow Creek Apartment development. The street was
constructed to minor collector standards through Anton Park. The Anton Park
Subdivision created numerous lots with direct connection to North Dakota
Street; most of these lots have subsequently been developed with single family
residences.
Page --2-
The site development review and subdivision approvals made in 1984
effectively revised the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map to provide for a
direct connection of North Dakota Street between 121st Avenue arid Scholls
Ferry Road. During the Comprehensive Plan update in 1989, the Transportation
Map should be revised to reflect North Dakota Street as it actually exists or,
if the Council grants the petitioner's request for street closure, North
Dakota Street should be deleted as a collector road.
Comments From Other, Agencies:
Comments were requested from other agencies regarding the request for
closure of North Dakota Street.
The Police Chief recommended that the street not be closed. He feels that
the street needs to be left open in order to provide alternate routes of
access for emergency vehicles. He is also concerned that closure of a
collector street would merely shift traffic problems to adjoining collector
and arterial streets.
The City of Beaverton Engineering and Planning staff also recommended
against street closure. They recommended that other ways be explored to
discourage through traffic and to discourage speeding. They suggest that
closure of a collector street should be a last-resort solution. Attachment 3
is a copy of the letter from City of Beaverton.
The Fire Marshall', office also recommended that the street not be closed
and that alternative measures be explored to reduce traffic problems. The
Fire Marshall's letter is attachment Number 4.
Traffic Impacts.
Traffic counts in 1987 showed an average weekday traffic of 2750 vehicles
per day on North Dakota Street west of 121st Avenue. Near Scholls Ferry Road
the traffic volume was 3010 vehicles per day. Since that timo, additional
development has occurred along North Dakota Street. Also, recently traffic
has been increased in the area of 121st Avenue due to construction on 135th
Avenue; some of this diverted traffic is no doubt using North Dakota Street.
Page -3-
i
If North Dakota Street is closed as requested, the portion of the street
immediately west of 121st Avenue would serve only the adjoining residential
area - approximately 98 lots in Anton Park and Millview. Traffic would be
reduced to less than 1000 vehicles per day. Approximately 2000 vehicles per
day would be diverted to 121st Avenue and Scholls Ferry Road.
Other Relevant Issues.
The City of Beaverton is considering a change to its Transportation
Comprehensive Plan. The proposed change would provide for a direct roadway
connection between 121st/Scholls Ferry Road and 125th Avenue (formerly
Sorrento Road) in Beaverton. If implemented, this proposal would make 121st
Avenue a more attractive route for through traffic attempting to access
Beaverton, and it would make North Dakota Street a less attractive route.
This proposal would be expected to reduce traffic volumes on North Dakota
Street. The proposal is currently under cosideration by the City of Beaverton
and by the affected property owner, the Beaverton School District.
If the Transportation Bond Measure passes on November 8th, the City of
Tigard will be making improvements on 121st Avenue. Included in these
improvements are capacity improvements at the 121st Avenue approach to Scholls
Ferry Road. By improving the capacity at this intersection, we hope to
encourage drivers to use 121st Avenue rather than North Dakota Street and
Springwood Drive. This work will be done in conjunction with the proposed
MSTIP improvements to Scholls Ferry Road. Proposed improvements to Scholls
Ferry Road are intended to relieve congestion. Improvements to Scholls Ferry
Road should encourage motorists to use Scholls Ferry for through travel rather
than North Dakota Street.
In the past, the City has received requests for closure of other collector
streets in residential neighborhoods. In the past, such requests have been
denied. Past discussions have recognized the need to provide routes for
through traffic and also the need to provide alternative access routes for
emergency vehicles. By providing alternative routes, we also help to dispurse
the traffic so that the traffic impacts are shared by multiple streets rather
than all on one street.
Page -4-
Alternatives Considered.
If petitioners' request for a street closure is granted, it will clearly
eliminate through traffic on North Dakota Street west of 121st Avenue and it
would be expected to reduce traffic volumes on the street. It is riot likely
to totally eliminate concerns about traffic speeds. Even on short local
streets we frequently hear complaints of speeding drivers. The wide straight
alignment of North Dakota Street is likely to lead some drivers to drive at
higher speeds than the neighbors would like. It is likely that some
trafficwill continue to enter North Dakota Street expecting to find an
outlet. Even good signing does not typically eliminate such traffic,
especially where the street appears to be an extension of the collector street
system.
If the street closure is not granted, there are a number of ways to
address the remaining concerns about traffic speeds and volumes of through
traffic. Several of those captions are discussed below:
1. Prohibit Through Truck 'T'raffic. Previous City ordinances have
prohibited through truck traffic on 121st Avenue. This effectively
eliminated through truck traffic in the adjoining neighborhoods,
until North Dakota Street was opened between 121st and Scholls Ferry
Road. Opening of North Dakota Street provided an alternative route
between downtown Tigard and Scholls Ferry Road, whereby trucks could
pass through the neighborhoods without violating the prohibition of
121st Avenue. It appears appropriate to prohibit through truck
traffic on North Dakota Street between Tiedeman Avenue and Scholls
Ferry Road, in order to restrict trucks to the arterial street system
as originally intended.
2. Prohibit All Through Traffic. The Council could pass an ordinance
prohibiting all through traffic ors North Dakota Street and signs
could be posted. However, such prohibitions are usually not
effective unless intensive enforcement is provided. Enforcement of
such ordinances is difficult.
Page -5-
3. Improved Sight Distance at Intersections. Somewhat higher traffic
speeds are riot necessarily less safe if adequate sight distance can
be provided. Sight distance could be improved in the Anton Park area
by working with property owners to discourage on-street parking and
to remove fences and landscaping which restrict sight distance near
intersections. Sight distance is especially critical at the
intersection of 125th Place, near a long curve in North Dakota Street.
4. Use Traffic Markings to Narrow the Available Traffic Lanes. Narrowed
traffic lanes usually encourage drivers to drive more slowly. One
way to reduce the traffic lanes without reducing traffic safety is by
the use of traffic markings and raised traffic buttons. Such a
method could be used on North Dakota Street, especially through the
long curve west of 125th Place. A button system as shown in
Attachment 5 would tend to restrict drivers to a narrow traffic lane,
thereby encouraging slower speeds, especially on the curve. It would
also discourage passing and would discourage "cutting the corner" on
the curve. Implementation of this marking pattern would probably
require prohibition of parking along the curved part of North Dakota
F'
Street. Installation of such markings would cost approximately
$5,000 and would require periodic maintenance.
5. Planter Islands. A more permanent restriction can be provided with
construction of planter islands in the street. This method is more
expensive, may require elimination of additional parking, and
requires careful design in order to maintain adequate street
drainage. It would also be necessary to determine how the islands
would be landscaped and maintained.
6. Review Speed Limits North of Anton Park. The existing 25 mile per
hour speed limit north of Anton Park seems rather low. In the
perception of the typical driver, the area north of Anton Park can be
safely driven at a speed higher than 25 miles per hour. For many
drivers, the same perception exists within Anton Park; however, the
Anton Park area of intense residential development requires a
somewhat lower traffic speed than the area north of Anton Park. When
Page -6-
the posted speeds appear unrealistic to the typical driver-, frequent
violation of the posted speed can be expected unless very frequent
and intensive police patrols are provided. One way to change the
driver's perception is to raise the posted speeds in the areas
outside of the residential subdivision and to post the 25 mph only
where the slower speeds are actually required. The City could
request the State Speed Control Board to review the posted speed on
North Dakota Street north of Anton Park; it is very likely that such
a request would result in the posting of a higher speed north of
Anton Park. The requirement for a lower speed within the Anton Park
area could then be emphasized by the posting of larger than normal
speed limit signs.
Discussion
North Dakota Street through Anton Park was clearly designed and built to
serve as a collector street. This was done before the houses were built.
Like most citizens of Tigard, the Anton Park residents would prefer to
live on a street with little traffic. We hear requests frequently from
residents throughout the City to restrict through traffic - to put the
traffic on somebody else's street. But it is essential to maintain a pattern
of through streets to provide for traffic circulation and to provide alternate
routes for emergency access. Not everyone can live on a cul de sac. The
community good requil^es that we also have a system of through streets.
Closure of North Dakota Street- would not be consistent with past policy
discussions of the City.
While it appears inappropriate to close North Dakota Street, it is
reasonable for the residents to ask the City to seek ways to increase traffic
safety along the street. The City should explore traffic safety improvements
as suggested previously.
The City and the neighborhood can also help to reduce through traffic on
North Dakota Street by encouraging improvement to alternative through traffic
routes, especially Scholls Ferry Road and 121st Avenue.
Page -7-
Recommendations
Staff recommends the following course of action to reduce through traffic
and traffic speeds in Anton Park:
1. Prohibit through truck traffic on North Dakota Street.
2. Encourage the City of Beaverton to pursue a collector street
connection between 121st/Scholls Ferry Road and 125th Avenue in order
to direct through traffic away from North Dakota Street.
3. Continue to pursue capacity improvements to the Scholls Ferry/121st
intersection in order to encourage through traffic to remain on 121st
Avenue.
4. Continue to strongly encourage the State to bring the Scholls Ferry
Road widening project to construction as soon as possible, in order
to relieve congestion on Scholls Ferry Road and encourage through
traffic to use Scholls Ferry Road.
5. Implement traffic markings to reduce available traffic lane widths
through the curved portion of North Dakota Street as illustrated in
Attachment 5. If successful in the curved area, consider extension
of the traffic marking patterns and possible construction of planter
islands in other areas of Anton Park.
6. Request State Speed Control Board review of the posted speed on North
Dakota Street north of Anton Park.
7. Work with property owners to maintain adequate sight distance at
intersections.
Submitted November 2, 1988
By '
Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer
br/7684D
April 20, 1988
Tigard City Council
13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, Or 97223
Honorable Mayor and Councilors:
The property owners of Anton Park, a subdivision of the city of Tigard,
request that S.W. North Dakota street be closed off permanently to through
traffic as a cul-de-sac. This cul-de-sac is proposed on S.W. North Dakota
street below the south entrance to Meadow Creek Apartments (See exhibit I).
The purpose of this change is to retain the Anton Park area for its primary
designation as a residential neighborhood.
Traffic levels are now heavy on S.W. North Dakota street. This high
traffic level is primarily due to individuals using the street to avoid
signals at the intersections of S.W. North Dakota and Scholls Ferry Road
and again at Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 121st. Developments now underway
41. at the intersection of S.W. North Dakota and Scholls Ferry Road include
an urgency medical center complex, a 130-child capacity day care center,
and a 40 unit subdivision. Additional traffic introduced as a result of
these developments, as well as the increased speed on Sorrento (125th) to
45 M.P.H., will increase the traffic volume and speeds beyond that of a
"minor collector" street to that of a."major collector" street,
detrimentally impacting the neighborhood environment.
Current and ongoing problems associated with the inappropriate use of S.W.
North Dakota street are identified here:
1) Dangerous street for children/young families.
Children use S.W. North Dakota St. as an access to Summerlake Park.
Riding bicycles/skateboards to the park is common. Numerous "near
misses" by motorists (including one in which a 15 foot skid mark was
recorded when a motorist narrowly missed hitting a child) create a
dangerous park access for children.
The safety of children awaiting school buses in morning hours during
high traffic periods produces a significant risk. Additional
traffic during early morning hours stemming from the 130 child
daycare center will increase risk to children.
Children playing in their own yards are at risk if balls roll into
the street and they run to retrieve the ball without looking.
2) Unsecure neighborhood for protection of property.
High traffic and easy accessibility to major arterials have
contributed to an increase in robbery incidences (Sturgess, 12/800^;
Ching, 1/88; Rohlf, 2/88).
High traffic area lends itself as a "cruise" area. The result has
been vandalism to property owners" yard lights and car windows shot
out on two different occasions.
4#whmewyl A10.
High speed of cars traveling on S.W. North Dakota has resulted in
mail box units being knocked down three times over a six month
period.
High speeds and the inappropriate use of S.W. North Dakota by
non-residents results in through traffic passing on the left, around
property owners trying to turn left into (or exiting from) their
driveways and cul-de-sacs. Often this occurs with oncoming opposing
direction traffic.
3) Decline in area livability.
Covenants, codes and restrictions were adopted for the Anton Park
subdivision to protect neighborhood livability. The high traffic
and speed levels negatively affect neighborhood livability.
4) Decline in property values.
Three houses currently built and offered for sale on S.W. North
Dakota street are unsold. According to the listing realtor, this is
due to the high traffic volume and high speed levels.
Currently occupied homes ranging from $85,000 to $110,000+ have been
negatively impacted. It is generally recognized by real estate
appraisers that busy streets reduce property value assessments.
Inability to sell remaining property sites due to high traffic and
livability issues will result in unsightly empty lots, and the
opportunity cost of lower tax revenues to the City from lower tax
value assessments.
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
Significant changes have taken place since the time the decision was made
to connect S. W. North Dakota to Scholls Ferry Road. These changes
strengthen the need to close the street where Anton Park meets Meadow Creek
Apartments and the new subdivision on North Dakota street. Change factors
are noted below:
1) Change in speed limit to 45 M.P.H. on 125th (Sorrento), the street
leading directly onto S.W. North Dakota, creates significant concerns
for the Aire ur_ Park property owners. Traffic proceeding across Scholls
Ferry Road at 45 M.P.H. is even less likely to slow to 25 M.P.H.
2) A 130 child daycare center near the corner of S.W. North Dakota and
Scholls Ferry Road will introduce additional traffic into the Anton
Park area. Parents driving to and from the day care center, late in
dropping off or picking up children (and anxious to avoid high penalty
charges for late arrival at the center) will travel at high speeds
along S.W. North Dakota.
3) Proposed change in route of 125th (Sorrento) to meet 121st. A
Beaverton proposal to route 125th directly into 121st makes the need to
eliminate through traffic on S.W. North Dakota even more essential
since Scholls Ferry traffic will continue to bypass the intersection
via S.W. North Dakota.
Considerations of the city of Tigard as noted by Randy Wooley, City
Engineer, are:
1) EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS
Ambulance service is provided by Metro West, located at Scholls Ferry
Road and Hall. Backup service is provided by Tualatin Valley, located
at Pacific Highway and Walnut. Access to Anton Park and surrounding
neighborhoods will be unchanged under our proposal.
The Fire Department access to Anton Park and all surrounding areas is
from Progress and will be unchanged. All surrounding neighborhoods
will retain multiple access routes.
2) CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The comprehensive plan approved in 1983 did not include S.W. North
Dakota as a connecting street to Scholls Ferry Road. There is some
confusion as to when this decision was changed. Randy plans to
research this issue.
3) COST OF SIGNAL LIGHT AT SW NORTH DAKOTA AND SCHOLLS FERRY
The cost of a signal at this intersection continues to be justified
since it will provide service to a 304 unit apartment complex, a 40
unit single dwelling subdivision, daycare parents, and patients of the
urgency clinic. Additionally, a light on the Beaverton side of the
street necessitates one on the opposite Tigard side.
We, the property owners of Anton Park, petition the city of Tigard to
change S.W. North Dakota street to a cul-de-sac at a point just south of
the Meadow Creek Apartments.
Sincerely,
NAME:ADDRESS
-
-~'-f - _ C~_~,~ ~O Y► \ l _ C I
G~~__L/1_o a _w------ - C-lit
i G
~-2- A d _ S_ W SJ~T~-----------------
L'
_L!&-L s- ~v-
L=-
75-
~r
a
C
NAME
}10AX,C, ,.Cures
ADDRESS
/ l t6-0 SCv' fQ.S' PL /C--..PA
V1 -77
I I ~/O S lZ5 ~c a2
1
I 13 S ~ZS ~ J 14,( -47
NAME
7+ r1. ~.r .y/~ . 74
ADDRESS
I,)_ pj71 F•-qn_
/ zz 1- v
-did A),p ~ L
/1 1,)7X
S ) Paj -
1 .;?3 % D
S t,j-\ . /Ion ll 4L'C,
AZ q3c,)
<
tj
5. W- /L 0.
c
-
N
~l~~~~ . ~ i /lam"
C_---Z~
00/
ADDRESS
/-Z.zlvr•
L V
SLJ
LoL)
1i ► z cu 1 Z3'=~ -~~ct
11
NAME
ADDRESS
113.5 5>,0 1a~ 7,4 R
tll 3I--
I -q ~
InI -c
1 i 1 Sw
l•Z!( -~f
PJAC
&P l1
P ~~Ct
1/HIS s~
i2~i th
Pt:~c~
~2 St1)
f %Y
1,2 V4
R-
yon s W
y;-q a~. ~(QC2
(13 ~
)x
1~-l ~F-G•
~2~
~
.
111s s 5 w
1 y
Q
P-ts~
I -
C
s
~ s.
N
y W1 y3 Jlili .r.4•
.t c '1
P VI!
r V ~ ~r•f ~ 1
O 71 N _ V
•3AV ~i
V
W
W U
t 0 3
~ 00
fMINf1700N07 1
CpNINAf000w
1~1
-ZV-1 w S
Y NO {
Al VQa
'A A
Hvila"
ws s
lil n
N t
' 1727 rrrat;wa w's s.
4 P
5B y~ a 0. . .
o T7
u ~
Q e ,IaNOa~oo
'.IwCNIr •1 71 V
rs
r
N~g7{AVN
f
I I
I1slV 333
I i o
K/
1
i7
P
W ••1\
i
1 ~
l
VIOfI
i S.W. •
0
` i s
•lA VI 1 'r'-
~a
0
O _ r
- Z
'r'b` S OIL;
r-L ~ Vn
~Y T
J ~
'
Ift
N14ii -
i
1L 1~
s
~ /
o
•
P-
~
tl y 61
UTTTm
~
1 111714
'
3AV 1• II
S
u ~ F
±
MS Q{
'
s1
_
S
MI
•n /
w
tra
LEGEND
I CONNECTION•BETWEEN SI:HOLLS FERRY ROAD AND Sm. 1351h AVENUE NEAR I -
WAL NOT STREET. I I
2 CONNECTION BETWEEN' 12111 VIA NORTH DAKOTA AND SPRINGBROOK TO SUMMERLAKE
AREA (SPRINGBROOK WOULD BF, A LOCAL STREET), AND S.W. 13011, AVENUE.
3 CONNECTION BETWEEN SCROLLS FERRY ROAD AND S.W. 12611, AVENUE AND FALCON I ••1.-••--•••~••'~''•.
RISE DRIVE.
4 CONNECTIONS BETWEEN WALNUT STREET,6ULL MOUNTAIN ROAD AND GAAROE STREET. I
5 '•ONNECTIONS BETWEEN HUNZIKER STREET, HALL BLVD., AT O'MARA (GENERALLY) 1
AND BONITA ROAD.
I
6 CONNECTION BETWEEN PACIFIC HIGHWAY AND 1-5 VIA DARTMOUTH, BETWEEN 691h AND ,NODE
HAMPTON VIA A LOOPED ROAD WITHIN THE WESTERLY PORTION OF THE TRIANGLE AREA. - \
7 CONNECTION OF COMMERCIAL STREET BETWEEN S.W. 951h AND 98th AVENUES. I\9 1 EACH NODE DEPICT
STREET
VV C
IONS TI-
CONNECTION OF ASH AVENUE BETWEEN HILL STREET AND BURNHAM AND ANY ~OF CONNECTTIONS TIO
J 8 REMAINING UNIMPROVED PORTIONS OF ASH. t~NEEDED FOR TRA
9 INDIRECT LOCAL STREET CONNECTIONS BETWEEN 92nd AND 108th, I I YEAR . CON N1
10F THEESESE.
N NI
10 RUESSER ROAD BYPASS ROUTE AS A POSSIBLE LINK TO MURRAY BLVD. I iNOT DEPICTED C
EXISTING STREETS
ARTERIAL _
CLOPMENT MAJOR COLLECTOR
~ m• • MINOR COLLECTOR
VICINITY
LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT CORRIDORS (LRT
.1
1 ~
79 L's
OF
BGA'V RTO1Va X320 :
_ e
O
ro -cm
.600
P. L
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PORTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION MAP
N
~ a~hme /vo- 2
August 10, 1988
City of Beaverton
Randy Wooley, PE
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Randy,
My apologies fcr the tardiness of this let-ter, but, I did
promise you that I would reiterate (per our phone
conversation) the City's comments concerning the petition
that you have received concerning the closure of North Dakota
Street (125th) south of Scholls Ferry Road. The city when
dealing with similar requests, prefers to look for
alternatives to road closure to resolve traffic problems of
this nature.
Again: to highlight some of the typical impacts of road
closures:
1. Closure usually provides a negative impact to police
and fire response times.
2. Simply stated, closures often just shift the problem
to another street and don't actually resolve the problem.
3. Closures create unnecessary out of direction travel,
in fact, closures may be counter productive in the sense that
the removed trips are just replaced with new out of direction
trips.
4. The most difficult situation created is the
precedent that it establishes and the problem with dealing
with other similar requests.
As you know, the City of Beaverton may have a more attractive
solution if the city changes its circulation plan to the
north to accommodate a direct connection of 125th to 121st Q
Scholls Ferry Road. Although this has currently been
"pulled" from the Transportation Plan Amendment now in
process, it will be analyzed in the near future as a
potential joint land use and transportation plan amendment.
As a suggestion, or more accurately, as we would likely
proceed with the same type of request, a first step would be
to identify the nature and magnitude of the problem (i.e.
traffic counts, turn counts, license plate studies, etc.).
Then some analysis would be given to what are the appropriate
countermeasures. A list of possibilities might be:
1. Signal timing changes
2. Enforcement
3. Traffic control measures: "chokers", "thresholds",
4755 S.W. Griffith Drive, P.O. Box 4755, Beaverton, OR 97076, General Information: (503) 526-2222
An Equal Opportunity Employer
.411aehmewf A/o. 3
islands, dieerters, signing, turn restrictions, lane use
restrictions, buttoning or striping changes, parking
restrictions, etc.
If all else fails and local pressure brings a resultant
closure - it was suggested by our traffic engineer that a
"hammer-head" turnaround and barricade design be utilized
rather than a cul-de-sac to better enable a potential
reopening if future conditions warrant the change.
In any respect, please keep us apprised of any forthcoming
decisions.
Thanks again for the opportunity to comment on this request.
Sincerely yours,
Rick Root
Transportation Planner
September 28, 1988
CONSOLIDATED FIRE AND RESCUE
Washington County Fire District No. 1
City of Beaverton Fire Department
Tualatin Fire District
FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE
Oct
Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Street Closure, North Dakota
Edge of Akron Park Subdivision
Dear Randy:
I would apologize for not having responded earlier to the above noted item
but to the best of my recollection. I have not seen your letter until today,
even though it was addressed to me.
As this is a major street running through this area, I can well understand
and sympathize with the residents wanting to close it. However, from an
emergency response standpoint, the station located in Tigard, the station
located in Progress and the station located near by in Beaverton would all
respond into this area utilizing S.W. North Dakota. By closing this street
off, precious minutes could be lost in responding to a fire if an engine or
responding rescue crew should become confused and drive into the dead-ended
cut off street.
Our recommendation is to leave this a circulating street, emplace speed signs
on the street and emplace "CHILDREN PLAYING" signs along the street and ask
for a more rigorous police patrol to enforce the requirements of traffic.
The City might also try "NO THRU TRAFFIC" signs at both ends on S.W. North
Dakota. Even if the street is blocked off, a great deal of traffic will
drive in just to be turned around to drive out. Twice the trips.
If absolutely necessary, the fire department can function fairly well with
this street blocked off.
If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me
at 526-2502.
Sincerely,
Gene Birchill
Deputy Fire Marshal/Plans Examiner
GB: kw
cc: Director Nelson
4755 S.W. Grffffth Drive 0 P.O. Box 4755 0 Beaverton, Oregon 97076 0 (503) 526-2469
S,*
AQaekwew Adv. ~
c
curb
0
0
Dos SOON No0
0
0
o °
00 00 _ 0000 00 00
o °
0
0O soon ■o0
0
• o
o °
° 00 0000 00 0
o °
0 O
0
0ON soon Soo
O
0
00 00 0000 00 00 curt
o
0 °
0OF soon so0
O
~ o
0
000 00 0000 00 00
o °
0
o'on soon so0
0
o
0
:00 00 _0100° °O o0
1 ~-L " - Oil
/.We .one
M REFLECTOR MARKER
0 4" BUTTON
Attachment No. 5
Proposed Traffic [Markings
for North Dakota Street Curve
West of 125th
11
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
Dec. 19, 1988 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: Ak;w07iaRE.4 -r_4•ww DATE SUBMITI"ED:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Restriction of 1! PREVIOUS ACTION:
November 1 1988
Through Trucks
PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:___~_
OL CY ISSUE
Shall the list of streets where through trucks are prohibited be revised?
in rest en
trucks are prohibited.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached Map No. 1 shows streets where through trucks are currently
prohibited. A primary purpose of the truck restrictions is to improve safety
'd tial neighborhoods. SW 121st is one of the streets where through
In recent years new streets have been developed near 121st Avenue, allowing.
trucks to by-pass 121st and travel legally through the adjoining
neighborhoods. We have received numerous complaints about large trucks using
residential streets. In order to restore the prohibition of through trucks in
the neighborhood, the City Engineer recommends that Springwood Drive, North
Dakota Street (west of Tiedeman) and Tigard Street (west of Tiedeman) be added
to the list of streets where through trucks are prohibited.
Trucks are currently also prohibited on all of Tiedeman Avenue. However, the
portion of Tiedeman north of Tigard Street has redeveloped entirely into
industrial uses which require truck access. We have received numerous calls
asking for clarification of the truck restrictions in the industrial area.
Also, we receive occasional complaints that trucks leaving the industrial area
continue south on Tiedeman through the residential area. Trucks beginning or
ending their trips within the restricted area are not "through trucks" under
the ordinance and may travel legally through the residential area. The City
Engineer recommends that the restrictions on Tiedeman Avenue be amended to
prohibit trucks only in the residential area south of Tigard Street. The
industrial area would then be outside of the restricted area.
Attached is an ordinance which would adopt the City Engineer's
recommendations. Map No. 2 shows the streets where through true.ks will be
prohibited if the ordinance is passed.
w ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Adopt the attached ordinance.
2. Amend the ordinance.
3. Leave tha existing code unchanged.
Y FISCAL IMPACT
Approximately $500 for signing of the ordinance if adopted. u
SUGGESTED ACTION
City Engineer recommends adoption if the attached ordinance.
br/7779D
d/la 1a1 ~ ~ 7 10 '3Ar -.~`Yy1u p• - ,~~7~R 1 =
f 1 .3AV ?O Nll 4 • .t17` L, r r3613H y~ J '3/
m `t d' {Yy OU
'3Ar
• i.. ' VS P'ie ! N~ ` l \ r.. y0 a 4~, A. •3Ar N46 ;
al 'u
,3AY 41I6 4 W
US 96 L5
Y \ N yy/+ fly 0 y Y= _ '..Y,:YIL6
N
it
BB tit 6M3A;
a ~,o yam' v die r~ S
'WIT
°f i _ n $ 9' 1: $a yM dS uJm OM1dIN0
W
CASCADE Z
I NU - da Z J 1-
~I
ENN ~v 1.,~ u~i Q i W1 0 . ob+'.y~bJ cA~gt '3AY 3:
SOtl1N all J m O ~s 1- ~ W
3/d W t
.s1 L... ~'7 V I ` Y Z N
~A$ ;d J
V •3AY 4490l g
V9 / k 'M'6 Z
sO PVE'i vQ~' u $ 3AY x o nu 3Ar WLAI S~3" z`
O(t. 2g/ Q' 4{901 '3AY 3AY g wi O
419 a _J 1- sZ"i add
C = ma; `xN W '3Ar ob;(4,
1983
J ^ M OOOMx B '3AY u 0 PL = 3 , Y21A
Q~d r IA J I W Ic"' W W
-Id w£11 4 Ou - a
0 '1 ill]
~ 0 as '3Ar 4111
~jU d,~ ~ p rF h u WOII p .~tl y V1SII 07
,NpV 'IJj.4,/ $ x U; ¢ f, dr Q w ♦ O N 'ld O f
/ 7 F Y1911 V F' 'M3 b/r 1811
ai= w ° o~Y+`, r _ am = g I~ d
< 1611
m 'l ArVLINVZNVp F Y .a 1 y ¢ 8
1f1 'T' y0N1'1 ON ~ a1Z1
1! tH
SW u r 1d L a AVE Sa0a na. n Y~i W w F 3
OL rj (n N4ZI > 1. 7K "'S aat~a• a~Wf.
zr X31 J j W W w F as F
MOQ~ 7 1(1OM001 J JWtZI 'M6 Z a ~2`pI - 3 u
m S
O of
r m O au 41921
m J....~ ~ $ u a~ ~i3Wy ~ a ~v ass , F ~ u
OlN3tltl08~. r ,d M ou u A w .m yJ~ u
Ntl316 10 .A ° W z1 a wW I 13
Q ZI 0 W 6 w. w F I USE
_ N
w P. If 8~p$IS ado wx 3A gW " Je ' at
m l >
G y 6C I1Q
G yy~' y~ as N I7~t 3Ar "N y u o Ef!% 1j 6y=y N
a b w A R Wu Id ~•!a~ F" ¢ c "Ire, o 0
v
as f G. W££I Y r Nib DR. d 16V
F S Li O ' m m<
•ld FFFi- _ ,ld u1 t41 - Su r -QE~'io ~.3 - '31 AV •991 x0r16AYH v a 3 . Vl £1 - - `.vim' .t ly 419£I
1d tl3AlIS tltl31 r o~ w,
O i ' W 0 W
AMMO x010 <ie ¢ ' AtlA91B~M 9£I m
o911r t 'tl0 A q Irm u C
U NO11r11o = N0111M I si as
Id u
r 0114 ¢ -
'Gli 631AVO "
gJ AYM 01L ¢
i W W
ZL >yi~ ¢ q ■
31oor6 m 1 o I CL aC C
o ; Ydd ` a s W I a~~
'OAl9 ti munpo
o I .a`
AYM W i • 1 Q~,! ~q
I• o-0y190NIx0011 ~ e ! ` v
3Ar L cl
a I .~.1
ti V{PDI i ~ ~ ~ '
44.t" -4 Jj Z s~
Y y
r 'Jtl31 PYZ91 J I lp
1
J l U s ' 1
W al ....IT. ~
z
A 3AV OIE91
i a
I n e T,
3AV
PIVG
•L. o . . AY'PJf6 •3Atl; 4{16 W .I t Ob 1' ),~>W I
Q ~ ~J
V O'jO C W F p
V J f5 J l: ? Z ° ~~~Y yobby eb~'4j b~ W ~C/ W N
aAY {L
l41L9
\ •,y F~' sag _ . ~
l "1 3Atl 44P6
M31A
A Q l ym~ z~pW Nl
'1 3r 9i~•` OG d.S u joJ •3A OM1dIN0
$ 2 1 ~l *A, = Z F"
CASCADE
do ~ '3Atl
c
i YD O ~ pb'fp<Of t H W
SOU TMEaN 3N11 Y,♦
ry~ N6
\1 w iW
~ a Gy Y 6NIM1tlM ~ y V 401
V ~ s
o ~
'3Atl 41MSf wu u
1 E~VE• `~1 $ 3Atl o O an r 3Atl `WtDI> 'I
'Will 3@LL o~ pb~
OV' = A%/ Wg oI5 YIB01 .3Atl JAY
=Ji r S Obl
a{B ► )'WJ
N t/ J< h W r"~ '3Atl VIp// NOb•
/ o gg ma; sb A =ffs3
Cl1ELLE o 112in
i
° ~ '3Atl u ~ N ¢ PL ; W
i ,a ¢ OOOMX B 91tl
d Jn / n 0~ w y
Id W£,d a q 7.. I~~- . ~ya► q z u A O .Y'1 11
•3Atl V1611 Or I b d o W ulsl~ p)
\...r ti!Sv O Z < 1- m W GII p ( b •M "id
J V. O t yrFN J N z C S 413 1911
tiJ'6~ C y u! s ¢ r, AY VIBII 4 zb0 q ) J'Ib/yd '3A
_ J o jeW4' .N VILII
hy~..~.,,d c J r 3 s~ o v1 gt, `j ju cc '3Atl w N by /^d b
Gael = W OO d ~r im 41911 AY , 11 W i i 1611 ih e
e ~Oe~ a
r~ m '1 Yl1NYZNYR Y , L w B I I i
'^31 m ~fll~' 10M1 OH N W IPIZI F~•, F a WF ~ F'
Y W q ¢ o AVE6Pu a_ a m jjp
as
b{131
3 3 Pi J WPM •,d m ot~ 1 1>a£z I x
NINMOO p ? ax 419Z1 QoZB ' I It
W2 Y I
N 885 > k At 4, F4
W O~• w A W m r_
r^
OLN3btlOS 1d W16 au lu zl a ~w I
Nb3L6 79 ZI W t3•~ w x "Ja W►
O J ~ f/~ _ f1 = ]C
axisGl <Y u xa1- I aP•id Y V16Z1-
W
too
3Atl WIN db ` i $ °m ~J iy~u
p )b,~ a u Id a.J,j~ w Q PVtfl m o Q
\y9~ H x g < 1 LL pal ~PVE
F Za N 2 z Nd a V W
r y x v I ~u i r ¢ra c o _ '3 AV L V
F lrl 4{P£I Y19fi1 C
tl m VI,Btl )PVL VH cpi 3AV V19fi1 ~~v~~ < ~n Y/
~ ld 83AlIS 1 a 4) C
O
t >.ana ameia 9£I
r ~ bA c
~
'8831 a P, m A N y
r L
u AVM '10 ia' d ~ m ■
•bD x N0111
r I
tl v NDLLtllIJ °d i z Nu ~JR
.~JQ Z 1 ~44•~~
Y 9nd \ mJ K Z z
531AtlO u J Omz tr
Av;A
ON o \ D6F LL = A
3Bitl
O oa
w Q.
Foove K O
d~
Ck.
VvHn"
'OAIB e
O • 1
O y
1.rM v I C
P' NI99NIM30R o < ~ p
'3Atl' c n o y h MO
d
bb~,VIBbI j o~ j2 1q J d
31
d o t Z° 41 ~ O ~ V' _
i tl° L j r ~
j bb31 /rz41 z
=p 4 U~ ._.i II
1
e r e ^ "
W
yC C 3Atl ►J£51 = v r
< t y~
i
.1
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: December 19, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Emergency PREVIOUS ACTION:
Muni n.l Cn,- A......-- . A
DEPT
December 12, 1988
/ REPARED BY: Patrick J. Riill
REQUESTED BY:
DlIT TfV reeitc
Should the City enter into an agreement which would allow the Washington
County Emergency Services Policy Board to regulate the provision of emergency
medical services provided within our City?
INFORMATION SUMMARY
All cities in the County are being asked to become signator cities. Banks,
Durham, Sherwood and Beaverton are not signator cities as of this writing.
The stated fundamental purpose is to regulate the provision of emergency
medical services within our boundaries, through creation of a policy board
(5.12.050) and adoption of rules (5.12.190), to assure prompt, effective,
efficient and safe service. The City Attorney is reviewing agreement.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve agreement
2. Reject concept of participation.
3. Study further.
FISCAL IMPACT
Impact to City is negligible. Decisions of Board could influence cost of
emergency medical services, either higher or lower.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Contingent upon City Attorney's opinion, approve agreement.
mh8374D
OK CITY ADMIN
1
11
C
WASHINGTON
COUNTY,
OREGON
November 9, 1988
MEMORANDUM
To: Cities of Washington County
EMS Policy Board Members
Interested Parties
From: Joanne Hoyt, EMS Coordinator
Subject: Consideration of the adoption of Washington County Code,
Chapter 5.12, Emergency Ambulance Service as amended by
Ordinance 334 "A" - Engrossed by intergovernmental
agreement by the Cities of Washington County.
The dates for consideration of an intergovernmental agreement to
accept the above referenced Code/Ordinance within the respective
City as reported to the EMS Office are listed below. After con-
sideration by the Cities is concluded, the EMS Office will take
the necessary action to initiate the selection process for vacant
EMS Policy Board positions. in tale meantime this Memorandum will
let you know what is happening.
City
Date
Corne 1 iw:s
10-18-88
Forest Grove
10-24-88
Ki-ng City
11-02-88
- - -Be nls
- 11-08-88
Hillsboro
11-15-88
Tualatin
11-15-88
Durham
11-1-6-88
Beaverton-
11-21-88
-Nor - = ~%iis=----
11-21--88
Sherwood
12-14-88
Tigard
To be arranged.
Mailing address: Emergency Medical Services Location:
Adninistration Building Phone: 503 / 648-8637 Room 305, Court House
150 North Firs; Avenue 145 Nonn Second Avenue
Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Hillsboro. Oregon 97124
WASHINGTON
COUNTY,
OREGON
October 17, 1988
Patrick J. Reilly, City Manager
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Mr. Reilly,
As you know, on October 11, 1988, the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC)
approved Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Ordinance No. 334A - Engrossed
and adopted the By-Laws recommended by the EMS Ad Hoc Committee with one
amendment. The amendment, made to Article VII, Adoption or Amendment of
Rules or By-Laws, provided that By-Law changes may only be made by a
four-fifths (4/5) vote of the EMS Policy Board membership at a regular
meeting. (See page 3 of the enclosed By-Laws, Exhibit A, Ord. 334A.)
Because Ordinance 334A - Engrossed made changes in Washington County Code,
Chapter 5.12 (Ordinance 277 as codified,), it is necessary for all Cities
presently Signator Cities to sign an Intergovernmental Agreement endorsing
the changes. (See enclosure entitled Changes to Chapter 5.12 by Ordinance
No. 334A - Engrossed for specifics.) At this time Washington County also
extends an invitation to Cities not now Signators to the EMS Ordinance to
do so.
The EMS nffice is anxious to complete the Signator City process in order to
reconstitute the EMS Policy Board as soon as possible. Therefore your
cooperation is requested in scheduling the approval of Ordinance 334A -
Engrossed and the Intergovernmental Agreement as an Agenda item for your
City Council at your earliest convenience. I will contact you the end
of this week to see when consideration can take place for those currently
Signator Cities and if Ordinance 334A - Engrossed and Washington County
Code, Chapter 5.12 will be an Agenda item for Cities not now Signators.
This is so the EMS Office will know when to begin the Selection Process
for EMS Policy Board vacancies.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Si cerely,
c~
~loanne Mcuilvra Hoyt
EMS Coordinator
171
Enclosures:" Intergovernmental Agreement
Ordinance 334A - Engrossed
EMS Policy Board By-Laws as adopted
Changes to Chapter 5.12 by Ordinance
Washington County Code, Chapter 5,12
10-11-88 by BOCC
No. 334A - Engrossed
lfe eed no--a-.0'? e~
Mailing address: Fmorgency Medical Services Location:
Administration Building Phone: 503 / 648-8637 Room 305, Court House
150 North First Avenue 145 North Second Avenue
Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124
C 1,
S AGE, made and entered into as of the ) rday of , lr1g~
by and between WASHINGION COLWY, a hone rule subdivision of the State of
oregon (hereinafter referred to as "County") and the C1 I~~ Ot
a duly incorporated city in Washington C=ity (hereinafter referred to as
"City").
WITHESSETH:
WHM;MS, County has adopted Washitx1ton County Code, QuVter 5.12 as
amended by ordinance 334, regulating the provision of emergency medical
services in the unincorporated portions of the County, and providing for
enforcement of the ordinance within the boundaries of municipal corporations in
the C=Yr-y, upon intergover mental agreement for such enforcement; and
V EAS, City desires that said services be regulated under and made
Y
subject to WastLingtoi County Code, Chapter 5.12 as amended by ordinance 334,
except as otherwise provided herein; and
, pursuant to CIRS Chapter 190 the parties wish to, enter the
following agreement for the performing of the functions described in
Washirgi:o n County Code, Chapter 5.12 as amended by ordinance 334;
NOW, THEREZ in cm-isideration of the ma teal covenants contained
herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Washington Canty Code, Chapter 5.12 as amended by Ordinance 334,
attached hereto as Attadment "A" and fully incorporated herein by this
reference, shall be enforced within the boundaries of the City the same as if
the ordinance were an ordinance of the City. the term 'Wash ngt on Counts '
appearing in Washirgton County Code, Chapter 5.12 as amend by ordinance 334,.
shall be deemed to include City for the purposes of this agreement.
I
r
2. Zhe initial term of this agre t sba" oom¢mence upon the date of
its execution by City and expire on June 30, 19&?, subject to earlier
termination under paragraph 3 hereof . Upon the expiration of the initial term
and any subseVent term, this agreement shall be automatically reraaed for a
successive one year term, unless written notice of termination is served by one
party on the other thirty (30) days or more prior to June 30 of the current
year.
3. Either party may terminate this agreement prior to expiration of the
agreed upon term by serving written notice on the other, delivered by certified
mail or in person, at least sixty (60) days prior to the effective date of such
early termination. By mutual written consent of the parties, this agreement
may be terminated, effective immediately, or at such time as the parties
provide.
a. 7he city and comity agree that each party will assum its own
responsibility in connection with any claims made by a third party against the
City and/or County. If the acts of the agents, employees or officers of the
county are the pate cause of any claim, action, damage, loss or expense
brought against the City, the Comity will indemnify, hold harmless and wi11
assume full responsibility for the defense of said claim or action. If the
acts of the agents, employees or officers of the city are the proximate cause
of any claim, action, damage, loss or expense brought against the County, the
City will ;ntlemn fy, hold harmless and will ass«m full respcnsibility for the
defense of said claim or action.
IL
AGr4zEMENT - page 2
5. Any notice provided for in this agreement shall be served upon County
to its Clerk of the Board of Comi.ssioners, C ycy courthouse and
by delivery
upon city by delivery to its City Recorder, City Ball.
6. This agreement contains the entire allremmt between the parties and
supersedes all prior written or oral discussions or understandings, express or
implied.
7. No modification of this agreement shall have effect unless and until
reduced to writing and signed by the authorized representatives of the parties.
G a.~.i,~ Off:
Ton, C3 r n , Mayor
S
Date Executed.: Lacem her I q (q'if
AVID AS SO F=4z
.j :ae
City A , C3-t3? Of
Oregon
VV1SIiII36-TW CC LRM, OREGON:
Authorized Representative
Date Executed:
APPFDVED AS TO FCR4:
John I-L J=-kin, COUnty Counsel for
Was+ington County, Orman
AGREEmERr - page 3
' r
Fo
o~T Z ~40
4c
? J~8
8
"A" ENGROSSED
1
IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
a
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
3
( An Ordinance Amending Washington
4
( County Code Chapter 5.12 Concerning
ORDINANCE NO. 334 ( Emergency Ambulance Services;
5
( Operation of Policy Board; and
( Declaring an Emergency
6
The Board of County Commissioners for Washington County,
7
Oregon, ordains:
8
SECTION 1
9
The Board of Commissioners finds that the current provisions
10
of Washington County Code Chapter 5.12 concerning emergency
11
ambulance services, as adopted by Ordinance No. 277, are in need
12
of revision regarding the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Policy
13
Board, and operation of such Board.
14
15
SECTION 2
Washington County Code Chapter 5.12 shall be amended as set
16
forth below. (Existing ordinance lan-guage as codified, with
17
deletions bracketed and additions underlined follows):
-
18
>
19
5.12.050 EMS policy board Created. There is created an
z
0
20
EMS policy board which shall consist of the following five
oc
►-m
a1
members:
c~
Z=
22
A. A county commissioner appointed by the board, who shall
00
W
3o
23
e the chairman of the policy board;
Jp
LU=
24
B.. Two city council members or mayors, to be appointed by
:)J
u-
25
the incorporated cities which have entered into an
}
Z
26
intergovernmental agreement authorizing enforcement of this
0
Q
page
1 - A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE NO. 334 CC:BB:DEE:0935d/10/6/88
I
chapter within their city limits as
provided in
Section 5.12.510,
2
in accordance with procedures as set
forth in B
y-laws of the EMS
3
policy board. No two members shall
be from the
same city; and
4
C. Two members of the board of
directors
of a rural fire
5 protection district, [which does not provide services to a city
6 having an elected official on the policy board,] to be appointed
by the district boards, in accordance with procedures as set
g forth in By-laws of the EMS policy board. No two members shall
9 be from the same district.
10 5.12.190 Rule adoption Scope. The director may, in
11 writing, recommend to the policy board, or the policy board may
12 propose on its own motion, adoption, amendment or repeal of
9,13 administrative rules deemed necessary to achieve the purpose of
14 this chapter. Such rules shall be adopted as provided in this
is chapter and may establish among other things:
16 A. Vehicle and equipment standards, including staffing.
17 The rules may provide for other governmental entities to impose
18
F
' 19
z
0
U, 20
zz
~
F10 21
0
_Z
22
<W
30 23
Jp
uJ ~
24
'J
U= 25
0
r
F
Z .c6
0
U
Page
more stringent standards than those adopted hereunder;
B. Medically related personnel standards, including
monitoring performance, mandating and testing acceptable
knowledge of response and medical protocols, continuing
education, and the terms of probationary periods for new
employees of licensees, employees who change certification
levels, or in response to concerns about health care delivery.
Rules relating to probationary periods shall be limited to
medical protocols and knowledge of the rules adopted hereunder;
2 - A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE NO. 334 CC:BB:DEE:0935d/10/6/88
f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 .
15
16
17
.18 -
19
20
21
r, t
s10
_•s
.a 22
~u
=W
to 23
.ja
24
~J
~J 5
6
Page
C. Medical operating procedures;
D. General operating procedures, including response time
standards, dispatch priorities, standards and coordination with
the 911 system, protocols and staffing levels. The rules shall
allow for substitution of EMT personnel on ambulances with
state-licensed nurses or physicians having special training or
experience in emergency medical care as determined by the medical
advisory board;
E. Reports;
F. Procedures for receiving and acting upon citizens' input.
and complaints;
G. Standards and procedures for designation as a medical
resource hospital;
H. Required insurance coverage;
I. Designation of ambulance service areas; provided,
however, that the standards for creating such areas shall be
based solely upon such standards as are necessary to ensure
efficient and effective provisions of quality ambulance service
as provided by state law and the State Health Division. ASA
rules shall be drafted so as to avoid, to the extent practicable,
restrictions on free entry into the marketplace and shall provide
a mechanism for redesignation to accommodate new licensees or
expansions. ASA rules may provide for competitive bidding for
service areas and shall provide for appeal to the Board of County
Commissioners of final decisions related to such bidding by
3 - A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE NO. 334
CC:BB:DEE:0935d/10/6/88
C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
.16
17
18
} 19
z
M
°v„ 20
zZ
0I 21
Z
=5 22
.n o
33 23
J p"
~0 24
_m
N
~ J
v1 25
:n 26
0
u Page
interested parties and for review upon the Board's own motion of
such decisions;
J. Communications;
K. Procedures for contested cases, investigations, issuance
of licenses and such other activities authorized by this code;
L. License, testing and other reciprosity agreements with
other jurisdictions;
M. Licensing and inspection fees; and
N. Ambulance franchising or contracting. No franchise
shall be-effective within an incorporated city unless the city
has consented by intergovernmental agreement.
f
5.12.220 Rule adoption Effective date --Appeal.
A. The action taken by the policy board shall become
effective on the thirtieth day following filing of the written
order with the clerk of the board of commissioners unless a
petition for review to the'board of commissioners is timely filed
with the director, or the beard of commissioners on its own
motion within the thirty days determine-s to review the action, or
the action specifies a later effective date.
B. The petition for review must be filed within fourteen
days of the date the order-is filed with the clerk and shall
S
state the alleged errors, the evidence and legal authority to be
relied upon on appeal and the requested action by the board. The
petition shall be accompanied by the fee set forth by resolution
and order of the board. Only those parties who made an
4 - A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE NO. 334
n
CC:BB:DEE:0935d/10/6/88
P
C,
1 appearance of record, either oral or in writing, shall be
2 entitled to file a petition for review.
3 C. All hearings on appeal shall be conducted on the record
4 in accordance with the rules for a .public hearing adopted by the
5 board. The petitioner shall pay the cost of providing a
6 transcript'of the initial hearing at least three days prior to
7 the board hearing. Failure to do so shall be jurisdictional.
g SECTION 3
9 The Board hereby adopts the "By-laws" for the Washington
10 County Emergency Medical Services Policy Board (Policy Board) as
11 set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto but not incorporated by
12 reference. The Board hereby delegates to the Policy Board the
"3 authority to amend such "By-laws" upon majority vote of the
14 membership of the Policy Board, provided that such "By-laws" as
15 amended conform to all state and local recruirements. The Board
16 may, upon request of the Policy Board or the EMS Director, or
17 upon its own motion, review and revise any such "Bv-laws" and
18- amendments to the wBy-laws' as nay be adopted by the Policy Board.
19 SECTION 4
20 The Office of County Counsel shall codify the changes made
21 by Section 2 of this ordinance, and is hereby authorized to make
22 any technical changes, not affecting the substance of this
23 ordinance, as necessary to accomplish such codification.
24 Section 5
2 A determination by a court of competent jurisdiction that
2 any section, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance, or its
Page 5 - A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE NO. 334 CC:BB:DEE:0935d/10/6/88
f
C
1 application, is invalid or unenforceable for any reason shall not
2 affect the validity of the remainder of the Ordinance or its
3 application and all portions not so stricken shall continue in
4 full force and effect.
5 Section 6
6 This ordinance, being necessary for the public health,
7 safety and welfare related to emergency medical services, shall
8 take effect upon its enactment.
9 ENACTED this 11th day of October , 1988, being
10 the fourth reading and second public hearing before the-Board
11 of County Commissioners of Washington County, Oregon.
12
13 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
14
5
C7 )Q6~~
15
CHAIRMAN
,,yP ^s'•Yi. ry's a""'f• att,:~;''!!r.
Y l4 s
1 Jc } ert~ 1r~ ~r°_ "g x j.
17
RECORDING ECRETARV
18 _
Z 19
M
20
zZ
om 21
c~
z
;io 22
C W
0 23
tnc
tnc
zo 24
:3 %n
o.J
25
z 26
0
U
Page
READING PUBLIC HEARING
FIRST 9-6-88 9-20-88
SECOND 9-13-88 10-11-88
THIRD 9-20-88
FOURTH 10-11-88
FIFTH
VOTE: .Aye Larrance, Killnack, Meek-Hays
Nay
Absent Rogers
Abstain
Recording Secretary:
Date: 10-11-88
6 - A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE NO. 334 CC:BB:DEE:0935d/10/6/88
Exhibit "A"
OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
BY-LAWS
WASHINGTON COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES POLICY BOARD
Article I: Authority
The authority given to form the EMS Policy Board is derived from Washington
County Code, Chapter 5.12.
Article II: Name
This organization shall be known as the Washington County Emergency Medical
Services (EMS) Policy Board.
Article III: Membership
a. Membership shall be as provided in Sections 5.12.050 through 5.12.080
which establishes authority for the EMS'Policy Board.
b. After two, consecutive, unexcused absences, the EMS Policy Board may
declare that position on the EMS Policy Board vacant and direct the
EMS Coordinator to activate the selection process as contained in
Article VI, b.-h.. An excused absence shall be an absence for which
a reason other than an unwillingness to attend is conveyed to the
EMS Office prior to the meeting and approved as excused by the Policy
Board. All other absences shall-be unexcused.
c. Board members shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing body.
d. Should a position on the EMS Policy Board be vacated for any reason,
the person selected to serve for the unexpired portion of the term
in that position, shall have been deemed to have served a term even
though less than a full two years is served. At the conclusion of the
term the selection process s-hal-l- again be- activat-ed_
Article IV: Officers
a. The officers of the organization shall be the chairperson and vice-
_ chairperson.
b. The chairperson shall be as provided in Section 5.12.050 and the vice-
chairperson shall be elected from nie membership at the first regular
meeting. They shall serve for a period of one year in this elective
position..
c. A secretary will be appointed by the chairperson.
d. in case of a vacancy occurring in any office, the vacancy shall be
41 filled no later than the second regular meeting after the occurrence
of such vacancy according to the procedure in Article VI, b.-h..
By-Laws
Washington County Emergency Medical.Services Policy Board
page 2
Article IV: Officers (continued)
e. It shall be the duty of the secretary to keep minutes of all meetings
and carry out the duties directed by the Board. Meetings shall be
tape recorded. The tapes shall be retained no less than five (5) years.
f. The officers of the Board shall perform such other duties and functions
as may, from time to time, be required by the organization or by the
By-laws or Rules and Regulations of the Board.
Article V: Meetings
a. Meetings shall be held according to directives from the chairperson
to the secretary who will notify members and parties who have requested
notification.
b. The place, date and hour of all meetings will be determined according
to agreement by the membership providing adequate notice can be given
to all members.
c. Three (3) members shall be necessary to constitute a quorum. All
actions of the Board shall require the affirmative vote of the majority
of members present.
Article VI: Selection of Signator City and Rural Fire Protection District
EMS Policy Board Members
a. At the April Policy Board meeting the Chair shall announce the expiring
Policy Board terms and request that the Signator City and Rural Fire
Protection District (RFPD) EMS Policy Board members whose terms are not
expiring (holdover Policy Board members) contact or convene the respective
east or west Mayors of Signator Cities and RFPD Board Chairmen, whichever
is appropriate, regarding the selection of a Signator City and RFPD
nominee to the EMS Policy Board.
b. The EMS Coordinator shall confirm the Chair's request to the holdover
Policy Board members in writing and notify all appropriate Signator
Cities and RFPDs of the upcoming vacancies on the Policy Board. This
shall be done in April of each year following the April Policy Board
meeting.
C. The Signator City holdover EMS Policy Board member shall contact or
convene the Mayors of east or west Signator Cities, whichever is
appropriate, prior to the Jun: Policy Board meeting. He/she shal•1
notify the EMS Coordinator of the nominee selected by the appropriate
Signator Cities prior to the June Policy Board meeting.
d. The RFPD holdover EMS Policy Board member shall contact/convene the
east or west RFPD Board Chairmen, whichever is appropriate, as to the
RFPD EMS Policy Board nominee and notify the EMS Coordinator of the
49 nominee selected by the appropriate RFPDs prior to the June Policy
Board meeting.
By-Laws
Washington County Emergency Medical Services Policy Board
page 3
Article VI: Selection of Si nator_City and Rural Fire Protection District
Members continued
e. The Signator City and RFPD EMS Policy Board members shall be selected
by majority vote of the appropriate Signator Cities and RFPDs respectively
which respond, In writing, within 45 days after being contacted by their
holdover EMS Policy Board member. Each Signator City and RFPD shall
have one vote. Eastern Signator Cities and RFPDs shall vote for their
respective Policy Board member and Western Signator Cities and RFPDs
for their respective Policy Board member.
f. For purposes of selecting EMS Policy Board members one of the Signator
City positions shall be filled by the following western cities provided
they are Signator Cities: Hillsboro, Forest Grove, Cornelius, Gaston,
Banks and North Plains. One of the Signator City positions stall be
filled by the following eastern cities, provided they are Signator
Cities: Beaverton, Tigard, Tualatin, King City, Sherwood and Durham.
g. For purposes of selecting EMS Policy Board members one of the RFPD
postions shall be filled by Washington County FPD #1 and Tualatin RFPD
or any succeeding legally merged FPD of these two eastern RFPDs. The
western RFPD position shall be filled by the following RFPDs: Washington
County RFPD #2, Forest Grove RFPD, Cornelius RFPD, Tri-Cities RFPD and
Gaston RFPD.
h. The EMS Coordinator shall coordinate the selection process with the
holdover City and RFPD EMS Policy Board members.
I . At the July Policy Board meeting the new Signator City and RFPD Policy
Board members shall assume office.
Article VII., Adoption or Amendment of Rules or By-Laws
Tba..adoptit or amentmen:t -F these -By-Laws shall be by a four-fifths (4/5)
vote of the snembers*of the EMS Policy Board at a regular meeting.
Changes
to
Washington County Code, Chapter 5.12
by
ordinance No. 334A - Engrossed
The enclosed "A" Engross ordinance 334 should be read in conjunction with
Chapter 5.12 of the Washington County Code (Also enclosed.) as only those
Chapter 5.12 sections being modified or added to are contained in the
Ordinance.
Section 2 of "A" Engrossed Ordinance 334 changes three 5.12 Code sections.
Section 5.12.050
Language is added which establishes the selection procedure for EMS
Policy board members as that contained in the by-laws. The by-laws
referred to by the Ordinance as Exhibit "A" contain the Ad Hoc Com-
mittee's recommendations as to the EMS Policy Board selection process.
The BOCC will be adopting these by-laws by reference. Of course they
may be changed by future Policy Boards. (See page 2, lines 2 and 3
and lines 7 and 8.) :
This Section also removes the eligibility requirement that Rural Fire
ProtectTon.Districts'not "provide services" to a Sigmtor City sitting
on the EYS Policy Board. (See _page•2, lines 5 and 6.)
Section 5.12..990
prw i des for BtiL`C review of Et'tS Pol i ry board
Language is added which
decisions designating ambulance service areas either by appeal or on
the Boa rd' s own mot l on_ (See page 3, 1 i saes 24, 25 and page 4, 1 ine.s
7 and 2-)
Sectian 5.12.220
Language is -added zo allow BDCZ on its own motion to review any r+=1~=
adopted-by the SYS Policy -Board. _
Section 3 provides fvr BOCC to adopt the by-laws recommended by the Ad Hoc
Committee and at the same time delegates the authority for amendment to the
ES- Poi U -y Scard-- iW i for amendment process-)"
Section 4 authorizes editorial changes by County Counsel. Section 7 is a
severability clause and Section b is an emergency clause making the Ordinance
effective October- 11, 1988 if adopted by BOCC.
411"..-
Chapter 5.12
EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICES
Sections:
5.12.010
Purpose and intent.
5.12.020
Definitions.
5.12.030
Exemptions.
5.12.040
Compliance required.
5.12.050
EMS policy board--Created.
5.12.060
EMS policy board--Membership.
5.12.070
EMS policy board--Term.
5.12.080
EMS policy board--Authority and duties.
5.12.090
Director--Appointment.
5.12.100
Director--Duties.
5.12.110
Director--Authority.
5.12.120
EMS advisory council--Created--Membership.
5.12.130
EMS advisory council--Procedures generally.
5.12.140
EMS advisory council--Duties.
5.12.150
EMS medical advisory board--Membership.
5.12.160
EMS medical advisory board--Appointment.
5.12.170
EMS medical advisory board--Terms.
5.12.180
EMS medical advisory board--Powers and
5.12.190
duties.
Rule adoption--Scope.
5.12.200
Rule adoption--Notice.
5.12.210
Rule adoption--Hearing.
5.12.220
Rule adoption--Effective date--Appeal.
5.12.230
Rule adoption--Reversal.
5.12.240
Rule adoption--Finding of procedural error.
5.12.250
Emergency rules--Procedures generally.
5.12.260
Emergency rules--When medical advisory board
chairman recommendation required.
5.12.270
Emergency rules--Post-adoption procedures.
5.12.280
Rules-Copies.
5.12.290
Rules--Compilation.
5.12.300
Rules--Petition.
5.12.310
EMS license--Created.
5.12.320
EMS license--Application.
5.12.330
EMS license--Denial restriction-
5.12.340
EMS license--Issuance.
5.12.350
Ambulance license--Created.
5.12.360
Ambulance license--Application.
5.12.370
Ambulance license--Issuance.
5.12.380
License--Terms.
5.12.390
License--Renewal application.
5.12.400
License--Renewal inspection.
5.12.410
License--No expiration upon timely renewal.
5.12.420
License--Fee payment required.
5.12.430
License--Application denial notice.
128
5.12.010--5.12.020
5.12.440 License=-Amendment.
5.12.450 License--Correction of violations.
5.12.460 License--Investigation.
5:12.470 License hearing--Request filing.
5.12.480 License hearing--Council and board notice of
action.
5.12.490 License hearing--Conduct.
5.12.500 Petition for reconsideration.
5.12.510 Intergovernmental agreements.
5.12.520 Transition provisions.
5.12.530 EMS fund established.
5.12.540 Prohibited activities.
5.12.550 Violation--Penalty.
5.12.010 Purpose and intent. A. The county board of
commissioners determines that the protection of the health,
safety and general welfare of the citizens of the county
requires that emergency medical services be regulated so as
to provide prompt, effective, efficient and safe service.
B. The-board finds that it is required by state law to
develop a plan-relating to the need and coordination of am-
bulance services, and establishing ambulance service areas
for the efficient and effective provision of such services
and is authorized to provide regulations more stringent than
those adopted by the State-Health Division. (Ord. 277 51,
1983)
'
5.12.020. Definitions. As used in this chapter, unless
the context requires otherwise:
A. "Administrative rules" means the rules relating to
emergency medical services adopted as provided for in this
chapter. Duly promulgated rules shall have the force of
law.
B.' "Advanced life support services" means prehospital
-and interhospital emergency care which encompasses, in addi-
tion to basic life support functions, cardiac monitoring,
cardiac defibrillation, administration of antiarrhythmic'
agents, intravenous therapy, administration of medications,
drags and solutions, use of adjunctive medical devices and
other techniques and•procedures, identified by rules adopted
by this chapter.
- C. "Ambulance" means any privately or publicly owned
motor. vehicle' aircraft or marinecraft that is regularly
provided or offered to be provided for the regular emergency
transportation of persons suffering from illness, injury or
disability, including any unit registered with the state of
Oregon as an advance life support ambulance.
D. "Board" means the board of county commissioners of
the county.
E. "Council" means the emergency medical services ad-
visory council established under this chapter.
F. "Director" means the person designated by the board
T
v
129
5:12.020
to administer and enforce the provisions of this chapter, or
the director's delegee.
G. "Disaster," otherwise known as "mass casualty inci-
dent," means any incident involving five or more critical,
or potential for a total of fifteen or more patients.
H. "Do business" or "operate an ambulance" in the
county means to provide private or public emergency ambu-
lance service in the unincorporated portion of the county,
or within any city that has entered into an intergovern-
mental agreement as provided in Section 5.12.510; provided,
however, that transporting patients from outside the county
to within the county only shall not be considered doing
business or operating an ambulance within the county.
I. "Emergency" means any nonhospital occurrence or
situation involving illness, injury or disability requiring
immediate medical or psychiatric services.
J. "Emergency medical services" or "EMS" mean those
prehospital functions and services which are required to
prepare for and respond to emergencies, including rescue,
ambulance, treatment, communications, evaluation and public
education. "Emergency medical services" do not include
services of a fire department which does not provide
advanced life support services.
K. "Emergency medical technician" or "EMT" mean a per-
son so certified by the State Health Division or the State
Board.of Medical Examiners.
L. "Employee" means an employee, agent or driver em-
ployed by a licensee.
M. "License" means a nontransferable, nonassignable
authorization, personal to the person to whom it is issued,
issued by the-director and authorizing-the person whose name
appears thereon to do business in the county.
N. "Medical advice" means medically related instruc-
tion, direction, advice, and professional support given to
an EMT via radio or telephone communications by physicians
at a medical resource hospital, for the purpose of a.ss.isting
in the provision of prehospital on-site and in-transit basic
and advanced life support services.
0. "Medical advisory board" means the emergency
medical services medical advisory board established under
this chapter.
P_. .."Medical resource hospital". means a medical facili-
ty designated under the rules adopted under this chapter as
having the capability to provide verbal advice and support
to EMT's at the scene of medical emergency.
Q. "Party" means:
1. Each person or agency entitled as of right to a
hearing;
2. Each person or agency named by the policy board,
as defined below;
3. Any person requesting to participate as a party
or in a limited party status who is determined either to
130
5.12.030--5.12.040
have an interest in the outcome of the proceeding or rep-
resents a public interest in such results.
R. "Patient" means an individual who, as a result of
illness or injury, needs immediate medical attention.
S. "Person" means an individual, partnership, company,
association, corporation or any other legal entity, includ-
ing any receiver, trustee, assignee or similar representa-
tive.
T. "Policy board" means the emergency medical services
policy board established under this chapter.
U. "State Health Division" means the Health Division
of the Department of Human Resources of the state of Oregon,
or its successor.
V. "Vehicle" means an ambulance or fire department
rescue unit which is used in the provision of emergency med-
ical services, but does not include a fire engine or ladder
truck. (Ord. 277 52, 1983)
5.12.030 Exemptions. Notwithstanding any other pro-
vision, this chapter and the rules adopted hereunder shall
not apply to:,
A. Vehicles owned by or operated under the control of
the United States Government or the state of Oregon;
B. Vehicles being used to render temporary assistance
in the case of a•disaster, or an emergency with which ambu-
lance services of surrounding localities are unable to cope,
or when directed to be used-to render temporary assistance
through an alarm/dispatch- center or a public official at the*
scene of an accident;
C. Vehicles operated solely on private property or
within the confines of institutional grounds, whether or not
the incidental crossing of any public street, -road or high-
way serving the property or grounds is involved;
D. Vehicles operated solely for the transportation of
lumber industry employees;
E. Any person who owns, drives or'who attends a pa-
tient transported in a vehicle under subsections A through D
of this section;
F. Any person who by state or-federal license is au-
thorized to attend patients, except EMT's and EMT trainees
as provided under this chapter;
G... Ambulance companies that only provide service to
fulfill nonemergency transportation contracts with specific
organizations provided the ambulance company and the orga-
nization are on a current basis identified and on file with
the director. (Ord. 277 §4, 1983)
5.12.040 Compliance required, A. It is unlawful for
any person to provide or allow to be provided emergency am-
bulance services in the county without first obtaining a
license to operate an ambulance from the director.
B. It is unlawful for any person to operate, or allow
It
131
5.12.050--5.12.080
to be operated, an ambulance in the county for emergency
use, other than transporting patients from outside the coun-
ty to within the county, unless a valid ambulance license
has been issued for the vehicle by the director.
C. It.is unlawful for any licensee to operate, or al-
low to be operated, an ambulance for emergency transport
that is not equipped and attended as required by rules
adopted pursuant to this chapter or to operate or allow to
be operated an ambulance in a manner in violation of this
chapter or the rules adopted thereunder.
D. "To allow to provided or operated" does not include
mere issuance of a business license or land use approval.
(Ord. 277 §3, 1983)
5.12.050 EMS policy board--Created. There is created
an EMS policy board which shall consist of the following
five members:
A. A county commissioner appointed by the board, who
shall be the chairman of the policy board;
. B. Two city council members or mayors appointed by the
incorporated cities which have entered into an intergovern-
mental.agreement authorizing enforcement of this chapter
within their city limits as provided in Section 5.12.510.
.No two members shall be from the same city; and
C. -Two members of the board of directors of a rural
fire protection district, which does not provide services to
a city having an.elected official-on'the policy board, to be
appointed by the district boards. No two members shall be
from the same district. (Ord. 277 §5(A), 1983)
5.12.060 EMS.policy board--Membership. Policy board
members shall be elected public officials. The members of
the policy board shall serve without compensation and may be
removed by a majority vote of the members of the relevant
appointing body or bodies. (Ord. 277 §5(B), 1983)-
5.12.070 EMS policy board--Term. Terms of office
shall be two years with a limit of two consecutive terms,
except that the initial term of one representative from the
cities and one from the districts shall. be one year as de-
cided by lot. Membership shall immediately cease upon leav-
ing public office and a vacancy shall exist until a new rep-
resentative is appointed by the relevant body or bodies to
serve out the remaining term. Terms shall expire on June-
30th. (Ord. 277 55(C), 1983)
5.12.080 EMS policy board--Authority and duties. The
policy board is delegated the authority, duty and respon-
sibility to administer this chapter, subject to the ultimate
authority of the board of commissioners. More specifically,
the policy board shall:
A. Oversee the operation of the licensing, inspection
132
5.12.090--5.12.120
and regulatory system adopted by this chapter;
B. Hear and determine appeals of license denials or
revocations by the director and final decisions thereon;
C. Recommend to the board of commissioners the hiring
of an EMS director and such other persons as are necessary
to carry out this chapter, and make recommendations as to
the duties and authority of such person;
D. Conduct hearings on and take action on administra-
tive rules proposed under this chapter, subject to appeal to
the board of commissioners; and
E. Exercise such other powers and perform such other
duties as are set forth by resolution and order of the board
to effectuate this chapter. (Ord. 277 §5(D), 1983)
5.12.090 Director--Appointment. Upon creation and
funding of the position by the board of commissioners, the
county administrator shall appoint an EMS director. (Ord.
277 §6(A)., 1983)
5.12.100 Director--Duties. The EMS director shall
administer and enforce this chapter and shall perform such
duties as are set forth in the county administrative manual
or by resolution and order of the board. (Ord. 277 §6(B),
1983)
5.12.110 Director--Authority. The director shall have
the authority to issue, suspend or revoke licenses, propose
.administrative rules or amendments thereto, adopt emergency
rules, seek judicial enforcement of this code and take such
other action to carry out this chapter and the rules adopted
pursuant thereto. (Ord. 277 56(C), 1983)
5.12.120 EMS advisory council--Created--Membership.
There is created an EMS advisory council which shall consist
of the following;
A-. One representative from each city in the county
which enters into an intergovernmental agreement fox en-
forcement of this chapter as provided in Section 5.12.510;
B. One representative from the police department and
one from the fire department of each city which enters into
an agreement as provided above;
_
C_ One general representative from the county, one
from the county emergency planning office, and one from the
county sheriff;
D. One representative from each medical resource hos-
pital in the county;
E. One representative from each rural fire protection
district;
F. One representative from each designated 911 emer-
gency communications center;
H. One representative from the Oregon State Police;
I. One representative from each private service
q-
133
5.12.130--5.12.170
provider licensed to do business in the county; and
J. One member of the public not affiliated with the
health care industry, to be appointed by the county board of
commissioners. (Ord. 277 §7(A), 1983)
5.12.130 EMS advisory council--Procedures generally.
The members of the EMS council shall be appointed by the
governing body or other appointing authority of each respec-
tive organization. Members shall serve without compensation
and at the pleasure of the organization represented. The
terms of office shall be two years with a two consecutive
term limit on the number of terms. The council shall adopt
rules of procedure specifying a quorum, meeting times and
other procedural matters. The rules shall provide that each
governmental jurisdiction have only one vote, regardless of
the number of representatives. The board may appoint addi-
tional nonvoting advisory members by resolution and order.
(Ord. 277 §7(B), 1983)
5.12.140 EMS advisory council--Duties. The EMS coun-
cil shall advise the board of commissioners and the policy
board on all matters relating to emergency.medical care.
The specific authority, duties and responsibilities of the
council shall be established by the policy board. (Ord. 277
§7(C), 1983)
5.12.15 0 EMS medical advisory board--Membership.-
There is created an EMS medical advisory board which shall
consist of the following:
A.. One emergency physician from each of the following
hospitals: Meridian Park, Tuality, St. Vincents, and Forest
Grove Community. The physicians shall be interested and
involved in prehospital emergency care. A physician shall
be the chairperson. Additional hospitals which provide
emergency medical care for citizens of the county may be
added by rule;
B. One representative from the Emergency Department
Nurses Association;
C. One certified EMT;
D. One representative of the Washington County Medical
Society; and
E. One physician involved in ongoing education of li-
censees and their employees. (Ord. 277 §8(A), 1983)
5.12.160 EMS medical advisory board--Appointment. The
EMS council shall announce vacancies, receive applications,
screen candidates, and make recommendations prior to ap-
pointment of medical advisory board members by the policy
board. (Ord. 277 §8(B), 1983)
5.12.170 EMS medical advisory board--Terms. Medical
advisory board members shall serve without compensation.
134
5.12.180--5.12.190
Terms shall be two years with a limit of two consecutive
terms, except that the terms of the initial board shall be
staggered such that one physician shall serve one year and
two shall serve two years. Initial terms shall be-decided
by lots drawn by the chairperson of the policy board. Mem-
bers may be removed at the discretion of the policy board.
Terms shall expire on June 30th. (Ord. 277 58(C), 1983)
5.12.180 EMS medical advisory board--Powers and du-
ties. The medical advisory board shall have the following
powers and duties:
A. Assist in investigations under the supervision of
the director and advise the•director and policy board on all
me-jical-related issues regarding issuing, suspending and
revoking licenses;
B. Recommend to the director and policy board rules
and amendments relating to protocols for prehospital patient
care, emergency equipment, EMT training and medications;
C. Periodically review the policies and procedures of
hospitals receiving ambulances and report to the director
and policy board;
D. Adopt rules of procedure; and
E. Perform such other functions as are necessarv to
carry out the provisions of this chapter, the rules or as
directed by the policy board. (Ord. 277-§8(D), 1983)
5.12.190 Rule adoption--Scope. The director may, in
writing, recommend to the-policy board, or the policy.board
may propose on its own motion, adoption, amendment or repeal
of administrative rules deemed necessary to achieve the pur-
-pose of this chapter. Such rules shall be adopted as pro-
vided in this chapter and may establish among other things:
A. Vehicle and equipment' standards, including'staff-
ing. The rules may provide for other governmental.entities
to-impose more stringent standards than those adopted here-
under;
B. Medically related personnel standards, including
monitoring performance, mandating and testing acceptable.
knowledge of response-and medical protocols, continuing edu-
cation, and the terms of probationary periods for new em-
ployees of licensees, employees who change certification
levels, or in._sesponse to concerns .about health rare .4eliv-,
ery. Rules relating to probationary periods shall be limit-
ed to medical protocols and knowledge of the rules adopted
hereunder;
C. Medical operating procedures;
D. General operating procedures, including response
time standards, dispatch priorities, standards and coordina-
tion with the 911 system, protocols and staffing levels.
The rules shall allow for substitution of EMT personnel on
ambulances with state-licensed nurses or physicians having
t
135
5.12.200
special training or experience in emergency medical care as
determined by the medical advisory board;
E. Reports;
F. Procedures for receiving and acting upon citizens'
input and complaints;
G. Standards and procedures for designation as a medi-
cal resource hospital;
H. Required insurance coverage;
I. Designation of ambulance service areas; provided,
however, that the standards for creating such areas shall be
based solely upon such standards as are necessary to ensure
efficient and effective provisions of quality ambulance ser-
vice as provided by state law and the State Health Division.
ASA rules shall be drafted so as to avoid, to the extent
practicable, restrictions on free entry into the marketplace
and shall provide a mechanism for redesignation to accommo-
date new licensees or expansions. ASA rules may provide for
competitive bidding for service areas;
J. Communications;
K. Procedures for contested cases, investigations,
issuance of licenses and such other activities authorized by
this code;
L. License, testing and other reciprosity agreements
with other jurisdictions;
M. Licensing and inspection fees; and-
AN' N. Ambulance franchising or contracting. No franchise
IV. shall be effective within an incorporated city unless the
city has consented by intergovernmental agreement. (Ord.
277 §9-(A), 1983)
5.12.200 Rule ado tion--Notice. A. Except as provid-
ed in Sections 5.12.250 through 5.12.270, prior to the adop-
tion or repeal of any rule by the policy board; notice of
the proposed adoption, amendment or repeal shall be given:
1. By publication in a newspaper of general circu-
lation in the county at least ten days prior to the day of
intended action;
2. At least thirty days' notice by mail to all mem-
bers of the EMS council, medical advisory board, to all cur-
rent licensees and to. those persons who are on File as hav-
ing requested notice from the director; and
3.--.Such other notice as the director deems neces-
sary to provide a reasonable opportunity for interested per-
sons to be notified of the proposed action.
B. The notice required by subsection A of this section
shall state the subject matter and purpose of the intended
action in sufficient detail to inform a person that the per-
son's interests may be affected, and the time, place and
manner in which interested persons may present their views
on the intended action. It shall inform the reader that a
copy of the proposal and the director's recommendation is
available for inspection. (Ord. 277 §9(B), 1983)
136
5.12.210--5.12.220
5_.12.210 Rule adoption--Hearing. A. The policy board
' shall conduct a public hearing on the adoption, amendment or
repeal of proposed rules. The hearing shall be conducted as
provided by rule. Until such time as the policy board is
established and hearing procedures are adopted by.rule,
hearings shall be conducted as provided by resolution and
order of the board of commissioners, or in the absence
thereof, in accordance with the Model Rules of Procedure, as
established by the Attorney General, OAR 137-01-030 (Nov.
1981).
B. A decision by the policy board shall be preceded
by:
1. A written recommendation from the director;
2. The recommendation, if any, of the EMS council;
and
3. A reasonable opportunity for testimony from the
public.
C. No rule relating to training standards, medical
protocols, medical equipment or resource hospitals shall be
adopted, amended or repealed without the policy board first
providing the medical advisory committee a reasonable oppor-
tunity to make a recommendation. The recommendation shall
be followed unless the policy board specifically determines
that the recommendation is clearly outweighed by a counter-
vailing interest of the general public.
D. The policy board shall adopt a written order set-
ting forth its action, together with findings regarding:
1. the legal e.athority for the action; and
2. The need for the action and how the action ful-
fills that need. (Ord. 277 §9(C), 1983)
5.12.220 Rule-adoption--Effective date ADDeal. A.
The act-ion taken by the policy board shall become effective
on the fourteenth day following filing of the written order
with the clerk of the board of commissioners unless a-peti-
tion for review to the board of commissioners is timely
filed with the director or the action specifies a later ef-
fective date.
B. The petition for review must be filed within four-
teen days of.the date the order is filed with the clerk and
shall state the alleged errors, the evidence and legal au-
thority to be relied-up-on on appeal and the requested a-ction
by the board. The petition -shall be accompanied by the fee
set forth by resolution and order of the board. Only those
parties who made an appearance of record, either oral or in
writing, shall be entitled to file a petition for review.
C. All hearings on appeal shall be conducted on the
record in accordance with the rules for a public hearing
adopted by the board- The petitioner shall pay the cost of
137 (Washington County
4/87)
5.12.230--5.12.260
AV'
1
providing a transcript of the initial hearing at least three
days prior to the board hearing. Failure to do so shall be
jurisdictional. (Ord. 277 §9(D), 1983)
5 12 230 Rule adoption--Reversal. The board shall
reverse or modify the decision of the policy board only if
it finds that the action was taken without legal authority
or contravenes the intent and purpose of this chapter.
(Ord. 277 §9(E), 1983)
5 12 240 Rule adoption--Finding of procedural error.
An action of the policy board shall be invalidated for pro-
cedural error only if found by the board of*commissioners to
have substantially prejudiced the rights of the petitioner.
When practicable, the board may order such corrective action
as it deems necessary to remedy the procedural error and
avoid invalidation. (Ord. 277 59(F)', 1983)
5 12 250 Emergency rules--Procedures generally. Not-
withstanding any other provision, if the director finds that
failure-to act promptly will result in serious prejudice to
the public interest or the interest of the parties con-
cerned, and sets forth in writing the specific reason for
taking action, the director may proceed to adopt, amend or
suspend a rule without notice or hearing or upon any abbre-
viated notice and hearing deemed practicable. Such an
action shall be preceded by at least twenty-four hours' ad-
vance notice to the chairperson of the policy board. Such
rule is temporary and shall be effective upon filing with
the clerk of the board for a period of not longer than one
hundred eighty days. The subsequent adoption by the policy
board of an identical rule is not precluded. Within four-
teen-days following the date of filing of a temporary rule.,
the director shall prepare. the complete recommendation re-
quired by Section 5.12.210 of this chapter. The statement
shall be available for public inspection during regular
business hours at the main office of the director. A rule
temporarily suspended shall gain effectiveness upon ex-
piration of the temporary period of suspension unless the
rule is repealed- in. emergency rule may be appealed to the
policy board in the same manner as an appeal of a rule to
___the board of commissioners, except that the effect of the
rule shall not be stayed pending appeal unless otherwise
directed by the policy board. (Ord. 277 §10(A), 1983)
5 12 260 Emergenc
-When medical adviso!
chairman recommendation required. No emergency action re-
lating to a rule shall be taken without first obtaining a
favorable recommendation from the chairman of the medical
advisory board if the action relates to training standards,
medical protocols, medical equipment or medical resource
hospitals. If feasible, the recommendation of the
(Washington County 138
4/87)
`tti-
5.12.270--5.12.340
appropriate board shall be obtained prior to action. (Ord.
277 §10 (B) , 1983)
5.12.270 Emergency rules--Post-adoption procedures.
Upon adoption, a copy of an emergency rule shall be sent to
all members of the policy board, EMS council, medical advi-
sory council and to all licensees. Emergency rules may be
appealed to the board as provided for other rules. (Ord.
277 §10(C) , 1983)
5.12.280 Rules--Copies. The director shall, upon re-
quest and payment of a fee to cover cost, supply copies of
rules, or orders or designated parts thereof. (Ord. 277
§11 (A) , 1983)
5.12.290 Rules--Compilation. The director shall com-
pile and index all rules. The compilation shall be supple-
mented or revised as often as necessary. Such compilation
supersedes any other rules. (Ord. 277 §11(B), 1983)
5.12.300 Rules--Petition. An interested person may
petition the director and request the promulgation, amend-
ment or repeal of a rule. The director shall promptly pro-
vide copies of the petition to the EMS council for review.
The.director shall promptly forward the request to the.pol-
icy board with a recommendation. Not later than thirty days
after the date the policy board receives the petition, the
policy board either shall deny the petition in writing or
shall initiate rulemaking proceedings. The form of the pe-
tition and the procedures for consideration of the petition
shall be in substantial conformity with the Attorney Gener-
al's Model Rules of Procedure, Rule 137-01-070. (Ord. 277
§11 (C) , 1983)
5.12.310 EMS license--Created. There is created an
emergency medical service license which shall be obtained by
all persons, including public entities, prior to doing busi-
ness in the county. (Ord. 277 512 (A) , , 1983)
5.12.320 EMS license--Application. Applications shall
be submitted on such forms and accompanied by such informa-
tion as i.s requirer3 by the director. lOrd. 277 §12(B),
1983)
5.12.330 EMS license--Denial restriction. Unless a
franchise or contract is authorized by rule, no license
shall be denied due to competitive market impacts. (Ord.
277 §12 (C) , 1983)
5.12.340 EMS license--Issuance. No license shall be
issued unless the director first determines that:
A. A complete and accurate application has been filed;
139
5.11.350--5.12.420
B. Proof of insurance as required by the rules has
been submitted. The insurance shall be subject to a sixty-
day advance notice to the director prior to cancellation;
C. All requirements of this chapter and the rules have
been complied with and the director determines the applicant
and all employees will do business in conformance with this
chapter and the rules. (Ord. 277 §12(D), 1983)
5.12.350 Ambulance license--Created. There is estab-
lished an ambulance license which shall be obtained prior to
operating any vehicle as an ambulance in the county. Each
vehicle shall be separately licensed. (Ord. 277 §13(A),
1983)
5 .12.360 Ambulance license--Application. Applications.
shall be submitted on such forms and accompanied by such
information as is required by the director. (Ord. 277
§13(B), 1983)
5.12.370 Ambulance license--Issuance. No license
shall be issued unless it is first determined that:
A. The applicant holds or will be simultaneously is-
sued an emergency medical services license;
B. The.ambulance meets all dimensional, sanitation,
equipment and other standards prescribed by this chapter and
the rules. (Ord. 277 513(C), 1983)
5.12.380 License--Terms. Licenses shall be valid for
twelve-month periods unless revoked or superseded. (Ord.
277 §14 (A), 1983)
5 .12.390 License--Renewal application. An application
for renewal of a license shall be made no less than thirty
days prior to expiration of the current license. (Ord. 277
§14(B), 1983)
5 .12.400 License--Renewal inspection. Inspection and
tests of all vehicles, equipment and procedures shall be
made as-provided by the director prior to annual renewal of
a license. (Ord. 277 §14(C), 1983)
5.12.410 License--No expiration upon timelv renewal.
If the licensee has made timely application for renewal,
such license shall not be deemed to expire, despite any
stated expiration date thereon, sinless the director has
issued a formal order of grant or denial of such renewal.
(Ord. 277 §14 (D) , 1983)
5 12 420 License--Fee payment required. All license
applications and renewals shall be accompanied by the fee
established by rule. (Ord. 277 §14(E), 1983)
140
5.12.430--5.12.470
5.12.430 License--Application denial notice. In the
event the director denies an application, refuses to renew a
license or revokes or suspends a license, the director shall
give the applicant or licensee written notice of the action
stating clearly and succinctly the facts and the conclusions
and ordinance or rule provisions upon which the action is
based, advising the applicant of the right to appeal, and
the time within which an appeal must be filed. The appli-
cant or licensee may submit an amended application without
additional fee, or may appeal as provided below. (Ord. 277
§15(A), 1983)
5.12.440 License--Amendment. During a license year an
application upon which a license has been issued may be
amended, and an amended license may be issued for the bal-
ance of the original or renewed license period. (Ord. 277
§15(B), 1983)
5.12.450 License--Correction of violations. The di-
rector shall, upon a finding that the licensee is doing
business or operating an ambulance in violation of this
chapter or applicable federal, state, municipal or county
laws, ordinances, rules or regulations provide written no-
tice to the licensee of the violation, and shall demand that
the violation be corrected within not more than thirty days
from the date of the notice, subject to the director's power
to immediately suspend or revoke a license. The notice
IF shall describe with reasonable certainty the violation, the
action necessary to correct the violation, and the possible
sanction if any.
A. The licensee shall be responsible for notifying the
director when corrective action has been taken and the di-
rector shall then make an inspection, if necessary.
B. If a licensee fails to take corrective action in
the time required, the director may notify the licensee that
the license is revoked or suspended, subject to the right to
appeal. Notice shall be by registered mail or personally
delivered. (Ord. 277 g15 (C-), 1983)
5.12.4-6-0 License— Investigation. The director may
make inspections, obtain warrants, subpoena records, obtain
test.imony.under oath and take such other actions as are
deemed necessary to investigate any applicant or licensee.
(Ord. 277 §15(D), 1983)
5.12.470 License hearing--Request filing. A person
receiving a notice from the director of a denial, refusal to
renew, suspension, revocation or violation as provided in
this chapter may request a hearing by filing a written re-
quest with the director within fourteen days of issuance of
the notice, setting forth reasons for the hearing and the
issues to be heard. The director may prescribe forms for the
141
t
5.12.480--5.12.510
4r filing of an appeal.
A. Filing of a hearing request shall abate the suspen-
sion or revocation; provided, however, that in any case
where the director finds a.serious danger to the public
health or safety, the director may issue an order making the
action effective immediately, but if the applicant licensee
demands a hearing within fourteen days after the date of
notice of the order, then a hearing must be granted as soon
as practicable after such demand, and no later than twenty
days after receipt of demand of a hearing, and the policy
board shall issue an order pursuant to such hearing confirm-
ing, altering or revoking the director's emergency order.
B. The director, upon receipt of a timely request for
hearing, shall promptly notify the policy board and shall,
within fourteen days, set a time and place for hearing,
which shall be not more than thirty days from the date of
receipt of request for hearing. (Ord. 277 §15(E), 1983)
5.12.480 License hearing--Council and board notice of
action. The director shall notify the EMS council of the
proposed action. The director shall notify the medical ad-
visory board if the action is based on a medically related
finding. (Ord. 277 §15(F), 1983)
5.12.490 License hearing--Conduct. The hearing shall
be conducted in accordance with the rules adopted by rule
for denial or revocation of. permits, or if no such rules
have been adopted, in substantial conformity with the rele-
vant Attorney General's Model Rules of Procedure, November
17, 1981. (Ord. 277 515(G), 1983)
5.12.500 Petition for reconsideration. A. The policy
board may reconsider a final order upon. the filing of a pe-
tition for reconsideration within fourteen days after issu-
ance of the order. If no action is taken by the policy
board within fourteen days after try, petition is. filed, the
petition shall be deemed denied. ?f the petition is allowed
by the policy board, a hearing on the reconsideration shall
be held and an amended order shall be issued. Only those
policy board members who vo-ea .-n the original hearing on
the appeal may vote on whether to allow a petition for recon-
s idera_t i.on_ _ . .
B... Review of the final decision of the policv board
shall be taken solely and exclusively by writ of review in-
the manner set forth in ORS 34.010 to 34.100. (Ord. 277
§15(H), 1983)
5.12.510 Intergovernmental agreements. The county
administrator and emergency services director are authorized
to negotiate intergovernmental agreements authorizing en-
forcement of this chapter within the incorporated areas of
C
142
5.12.520--5.12.540
the county. Such agreements shall be subject to approval by
the board of commissioners. (Ord. 277 516, 1983)
5 12 520 Transition provisions. A. Notwithstanding
any other provision, the EMS policy board shall not be
established until such time as intergovernmental agreements,
as provided in Section 5.12.510, are entered into by the
board and the respective city councils of three incorporated
cities. The policy board shall be empowered to perform the
duties and responsibilities set forth in this chapter on the
thirteenth day after the filing with the clerk of the board
of the resolutions appointing the members set forth in Sec-
tion 5.12.050.
B. Until such time as the policy board is established
and empowered as provided above, the board of county commis-
sioners shall act as the policy board.
C. All persons doing business in the county on the
effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter
shall have thirty days from the date of notice of availabil-
ity from the director to file an application for the li-
censes provided for herein. In the interim, all persons
currently doing business or commencing to do business shall
comply with the provisions of this chapter and the rules as
if they were licensees. (Ord. 277 §18, 1983)
5.12.530 EMS fund established. There is established
an EMS fund to be administered by the county department of
finance or its successor. All license, inspection or other
such fees shall be deposited in this fund. All such fees
shall be dedicated to, and used only for, payment of the
costs of administering the EMS regulatory system provided
for in this chapter, including compensation for the director
and support personnel, equi F-mexitf supplies, legal costs and
overhead. (Ord. 277 519, 1983)
5.12.540 Prohibited activities- No applicant or li=censee, applicant's or licensee's employee or any other per-
son doing business as defined hereunder shall:
A. Make a false statement of a material fact, or omit
disclosure of amaterial fact, in an application for a li-
cense;
B. Monitor or-intercept emergency medical services
communications for profit or gain;
C. Solicit information as to accident locations by
payment of any form of gratuity;
D. Charge for services not performed or make duplicate
charges for the same service;
E. Perform services of an EMT or EMT trainee unless
authorized by state law, this chapter and the rules adopted
hereunder;
F. Contact by radio or telephone for the purpose of
receiving medical advice, a hospital which has not been
143
5'.12.550
approved as a medical resource hospital under the rules
adopted in this chapter. Nothing in this chapter shall
prevent an EMT from contacting the patient's private
physician or the licensee's physician advisor;
G. Fail or refuse to respond to notice of a medical
.emergency from an authorized alarm/dispatch center when the
ambulance subject to call is available for service;
H. Falsify, deface or obliterate any license or cer-
tificate required under this chapter;
I. Transport an emergency patient in any vehicle other
than a licensed ambulance; or
J. Violate any provision of the chapter or any rule
duly enacted hereunder. (Ord. 277 §17, 1983)
5.12.550 Violation--Penalty. A. In addition to any
other provision, a violation of any provision of this chap-
ter or the rules adopted pursuant to this chapter shall be
punishable by a fine of not more than two hundred fifty dol-
lars per occurrence. Each day of violation is deemed a sep-
arate occurrence.
B. Violators shall be cited and prosecuted pursuant tc
the county uniform citation procedures. (Ord. 277 §20,
1983)
C