City Council Packet - 08/08/1988 AGENDA UPDATE
August 8, 1988
STUDY SESSION - Agenda Review
CC conscaosus to pull up for review on 8/15 SDR 88-15 John & Rose
Tennant aM SDR 85-116/li 88-16 - Feichtmeir/Warren/PGE (Key Pacific),
Re: Drainage and parking space size.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council, at 7:25 p.m, went go into
Executive Session under the provisic.,,rns of QRS 192,660 (1) (a), (d),
(e), & (h) to discuss City Administrator selection, labor relations,
real property transactions. and curront and pending litigation issues.
Executive Session recessed at 7:34 p.m.
1, BUSINESS MEFIING:
1 .1 Call 1t> Order (7,38 p,m,) and Roll Call Sc Absent
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Laxs Per Issue, PloAsa)
Dave Klingole - 132nd Annoxotion
pa,ul Noavirland - Stroot jmprovomonL4 (Spoko During A",lancia Item No. 1)
31 PRF 1.3LN1 A11pN QI' K[YS '10 1111' C11 Y
o Mayor Brian
4. CON$[',N1 A(,[NOA, Theus.� items arra" conisidorod to be routine or,(j may bo
onwctud in ono motit)n without sopar"at:u disc,unaion, Anyunu may roquout;
ti►+4t ion itom be romoviod by 1114�t.lon for diucusai►.,n rand soparato ar.tiora.
Motion to:
4.1 Re(:.)iura and F"ilu:
aa. Council MOcatingl Cdlundar UFxiAto
b, Bull Mountain/Walnut Urban 'oorvicou Study - Tabled - 8/15/86
c. Juno Dop,artmuntal Monthly Rrapor-t Community Survicou
d. Municipal Services/Contracts Policy Report (Was #Vjwwiaa item
No. 8 - Consensus of Council to place an Consent llgasaa" and
discuss at a later date.)
4,2 Approve Arraaas of I':riturcast - Roo. # 88m_ - Romovo from caajondA
4.3 Approvo Agrooment & Authurito Signoturo By Mayor and City Recyordor
- Gonraral TolrrphOno €1rid90 Widoninq - Grooriburg at Ash Crook
4,4 Accept Public, Improvements'
a. Smithson Storm Sower Improvomrantr -- Revolution No. 8843
b. McDonald Acr^,, Subdivision Improvcamonts Resolution No, 88.•.74
4.5 Approve Partial buyout of Citicorp Computar Loaso - Roo. No. 88-R75
4.6 R®crass Council Meeting, Convene Local Contract Review Board (LCRB);
s. Authorize Bid Request For Streat Projects;
b. Approve Request For Proposals, City Cantor Design Consultant;
Amendment to 4.6 b - Under "Background Section" - reference the
Portland State University Study and ask Design Cbnsalten+t review
this study for soca foundation of their work; and udkrr "Submittal
Requirements" - include agroeownt of kwum which will be spw* in
working with the City Center Plan Task Force and possibly salt
forth om meeting for new consultant to meat with former
consultant.
Ea/Ed UA - As amended
COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 8, 1988 - PAGE 1
MF
5. 135111 AVENUE L.I.D. BID AWARD - LCRB
o City Engineer
Jo/EA tWk - tmwd bid to low biddter—Dirt and fvj9raWte Interchange,
Inc.
ADJOURN LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEEIING
RECONVENE COUNCIL ME=ETING
6. ORDINANCE NO, 88x16 AN ORDINANCE:. 10 AMEND SUBSECTIONS 18,68.040,
18,68.0504
AND 18,130.150 OFF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE -
INDUSTRIAL PARK ZONE (ZOA 88--01) REQUESTER BY PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES,
0 Second Reading Required From July 25, 1988 Council. Meeting
Ed/Ea Ord, 88-16 adopted 3-1; Jo Nay
7, PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION - 'TRANSPORTATION CAPIT41L IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FROM JULY 18, 1988
a, Public Hearing Closed - 7/18/88
b, Council Cons idenAtion _. Can For Election 11,/8/08
Resolution 84-76 - Amended wording before them — (to be inserted
under the last project on Us* list in the "Whereas" section); "and
such other projects as Council may arca" after tto above list of
improvements is completed," Also - grammatical chmmwjes as noted in
Section 4 of proposed Resolution
81 ANNENATION POLICY RrSOL.UI3ON NO, 08-^77 Ed/Jo UA.,,.-
9. MUNICIPAL SERVICES/CONTRACTS POuC:Y Moved to Consent Agenda - Item No,
4.1d. - to be scheduled for discussion at a future meeting
10. C3:1 Y AUMINS ST RAT OR COMM[:N1 S
Resolution No. 08-72 Ed/Ea UA (Resolution honoring Bob Joan)
Prusent4tion by MACC raprosentativess of thoir Resolution Nu, 00 -07
(from Bruce Crust of MACC and Tim ('wort - Asat, City Ma►nacgor of
Ili l luboro)
it, NON--AGLNDA 0 E MS s None
12, EXE'CU7'3:VE SUS 30N: 1ho Tigard City Council, at 9,06 ;),Ili, reconvened
into Executive Gession undor Lha provisions of ORS 192.660 (1)
(d), (e), & (h) to discuss City Administrator aaluction, labor
relations, roaI property trornsaactions, and currant and pending
litigation issuoo,
13, STUDY SESSION - Cl TY ADMINISTRATOR EXCHANGE COMMUNT (Administrator
commented before going into Exacutive Session)
14, ADJOURNMENT 9:54 p.m.
lw/5599D
t� COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 8, 1988 - PAGE 2
1.
1111!1 1 1110 mill
• UPDATED 8/5/68
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate
BUSINESS AGENDA - CATV sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available,
AUGUST S. 1988, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start:
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that. agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are
a0a 131.25 SW HALL BLVD, asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Lunger matters
4 -00 d TIGARD. OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting
either the Mayor or City Administrator.
6:30 u STUDY SESSION - Agenda Review
7%30 1, BUSINESS MEETING;
1.1 Call To Order and Roll tall
1,2 Pledge of Allegiance
1,3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items
?:35 2. VISITOR'S AGLNDA (2 Minutes or Less Per Issue. Please)
7145 3, PRESENTATION OF KEYS TO THE CITY
o Mayor Brian '� Sr S- -7
7:55 4, CONSENI AGENDA; "these it.oms are con4idorvd to bo routine and may bo
on:actod in one motion withWAL sop4r•a.to diucuauion. Anyono may requoal:
that an item bu romuvod by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to!
4,1 Roceivr and 3'ilw
,a, Council Mootinij Calendar Upd4*to
b, Elull Muuntaain/Walnut Urban Sorvicc%u Stud;
c, ;Tuns► DopArtmuntal Munthly Roport „m Community SarviCO'd
4.2 APprovo Aroaa of ]nt.or(;vt -. Roo, 0 88• � -- Removca from ragondo
4,3 Approva A(lruaamont & Authori arc:► Me%yor and City Rocordor
-.. Gonoral Tolophone Prid90 Widanintj Grooriburg tat Ash Croo-k
4.4 Acccapt Public Impruvumcantu
ta, Smithson Storm Sower lmprovk).luor)ts Resolution No. 88M• -,__.
b, McDonald Ac.ros SuFxiiuiaion Improvomantu - Raauolut.ion No. 88-
4.5
8-4.5 Approvo Paarti+al Buyout of Citicorp Computer i. ago a.. Ros, No,
4,6 Rocavu Council Mooting; Convono Local Contract Roviow noard (I..lRIJ);
et, Authori,-o (lid Ruquaaut Ior, Stroot Projoctu;
b. Approvca Roquert ror Propotalst City Conter Dauirin Consultant;
8100 135TH AVENUE: L.I,0, BIC) AWARE) ..• LCRD
o City Enginoor
ADJOURN LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MLEI]NG
RECONVENE COUNCIL. MEETING
800 6. ORDINANCE NO. 88-16 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SUBSECTIONS 18,68.040,
18.68.050, AND 18.130,150 OF THE TIGARD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUE - INDUSTRIAL PARK
ZONE (ZOA 88---01) REQUESTED BY PACIFIC REALTY
ASSOCIATES.
o Second Reading Required From July 25, 1988 Council Meeting
COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 8, 1988 - PAGE 1
8:10 7. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION — TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FROM JULY 18, 1988
a. Public Nearing Closed — 7/18/88
° b. Council Consideration _. call For Election 11/8/88 — Res. No. 88-�
8:30 8. ANNEXATION POLICY — RESOLUTION NO.
0 Community Services Director
NQ so
8:45 9. MUNICIPAL SERVICES/CONTRACTS POLICY — RESOLUTION NO. 88-
0 Czty Administrator <� ! r� _.- y�','f `i4 C_(
Z4
9100 10, CITY ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS
9:25 11. NON-.ACE:NDA Il"EMS: From Council and Staff
9:30 12, EXECUTIVE Sl SS10N; They Tigard City Council will go into Execut.ive
Sossion under the.+ Provisions of ORS 1.92,660 (1) (a), (d). (e;). & (h) to
discuss City Administrator selection, labor relat;iuns, real property
transactions, and curront and pondim.1 litigation issui.a.
9:50 13 , STUDY SCS14ION m• CITY A0MINISI'RAT'OR CXCHANGC C"i NTS
10:00 14, ADJOURNM[N1
lw/a599D
_.
COUNCIL AGENDA — AUGUST 8, 1988 — PAGE 2
JA
•
T I G A R D CITY C 0 U N C I L —
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — AUGUST 8, 1988, 1988 — 6:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present.: Mayor Tom Brian; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon,
Jerry Edwards, Valerie Johnson; City Staff: Bob Jean, City
Administrator; David Lehr, Chief of Pulic.a: Jill Monley, Community
Services Director; Ed Murphy, Community Development Director; Tim
Ramis., Legal Counsel; Catherine Wheatley, Deputy City Recorder, and
Randy Wooley, City Engineer ,
2, STUDY SESSION -- AGENDA REVIEW
a. After discussion, Council consensus was to schedule time (during
the 8!15/88 Council meeting) to review SDR 88-15. John & Rose
Tenant and SCIR 88-•16/V 88- 16, reichtmeir/Warren/PGC (Key
Pacific). Of concern to Council was whether or not the
Director's decision. with rotjard to drainage detention, was
consiuteant with Council policy. Also to lies roviowed w+as the
decision made concerning parking space size.
b. Councilor, radon noted noiaa prob1oms eaxporioncod by thea
noighborhood ric,xt to the? 1 ig and Markotplaco (Mercury
Deavolopni ant) , ;3ho aedviaead that a m4,eatinq with t:tie noit3hborhood
would bo hold lotur in the wook; Council would bo. saduiliod of
places drrd time.
C. Councilor Johnson requoutod that Item No, 4,1,b, (Rocoivo & 111e
of thea (lull Mountain/ Walnut Urban Sorvicou Study Report) be
teabled to thea Auquut 1'.i, 1900 mooting to callow me5r4 times L.
rovJ.ow, Council consensus w.as to tdblu thea iteam pa's roquoutvd,
d. Council and Community Devolopment, Director roviowod Agondfa Item
No. 6, Community Dovealupmunt Diroctor notod ut:aaff rocommondead
that Council l adopt: Or d imanco No, 00-46 ou prO sent0d at thea
July 25, 1908. mera`inq with thea dmondmont that tread and broakf«alt
uses bei oxcludud .
0. After diucu%%ion, Council convonsurs wean to cortuider A�Aondra Itom
No. 9, Municipal Sorviceas/Contra4tu Policy Report uncdur tho
Consent Agendfa as Itom No. 4, 1 ,d, There would be discussion on
this agonda item at ua lsator data.
3. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Tigard City Council went into E:xecutiva Sausion
at 7:25 p.m. under thea provisions of ORS 192,660 (1) (a), (d), (a), and
(h) to discuss City Administrator solaeetion, labor relations, rcml
property transactions, and current and ponding litigation issues.
EXECUTIVE SESSION RECESSED AT 7:34 PM,
BUSINESS MEETING RECONVENED AT 7:38 PM.
Page 1 -y COUNCIL MINUTES — AUGUST 8, 1988
4. CALL FOR NON—AGENDA ITEMS
a. Mayor rioted that Agenda Item 4.1.b. Bull Mountain/Walnut Urban
Services Study was tabled to the August 15, 1988, meeting.
�+ b. Mayor noted that Agenda Item No. 9, Municipal Services/Contracts
Policy Report was moved to the Consent Agenda, Item No, 4.1.d.
There would be discussion on this agenda item at a later date.
C. Mayor noted that Agenda Itiam No, 4.2. Approve Aroas of Interest
Resolution, was removed from the agenda prior to the meeting.
5. VISITOR'S AGENDA
a, Dave Klingele, 12900 SW 132nd Avenue, Tigard, Oregon,
Mr. Klingole advised he had petitioned for annexation to the
City, He distributed a maap of the aarpaa involved.
Mr, Klingole rioted that the petitioners wished to be annexed
without char"3e, 110 r•pport;od that: thort, may bo others in the
nearby area who will alio roquc►st annexation within the next week
and will ,join him in his petition efforts.
Councilor Johnuon adviTiod Mr. Klint olo that Council w:ai williri,l
to mtr(}t: with individuas►ls inter-putod in annt�Kfi4ti4�r1 ►n►� answ+�r
their quuntiono, Strafe, by Council direction, w.as riot t;o take a
prop aactivo r►oleo in annexation issues.
b. Mr. Klintplo advised thrat: ho had lott:ors from c:it.izonu ro94rding
drain field problomi, Mayor asked Mr. Klin(3olo to submit the
lottors to tflo City Cr►ginoor for, oxrvmination of the probloms.
C. Mayor- tha+nkv-d Mr. Klingole for his offorta with rogaard to 0o
annoxaat:ion proposrsals ,
b, PRESENTATION OF KEY$ TO THE CITY
a, Tho following pooplo wero rocognitod for their uorvico on as board
or committee and wore prcas►antod with a Kry to the City
Cortificaato by Lha MAycar•t
Chris Deffording City Contor Plan Task Force
David Clumcant Economic Dvvcalopmont• Comm►ittao
Suo Cwrvor Library Board
Dorenca Thomas Library Board
Cor►nice Smith Noighbor•hood Planning Organization 016
Page 2 — COUNCIL MINUTES — AUGUST 8, 1988
7. CONSENT AGENDA:
7,1 Receive and File;
a. Council Meeting Calendar Update
�~ b, Bull Mountain/Walnut Urban Services Study - Tabled - 8/15/88
c, June Departmental Monthly Report -- Community Services
d. Municipal Services/Contracts Policy Report
7.2 Approve Areas of Interest - Res, # 8a-„ - (Removed from agenda)
7,3 Approve Agrceaaent & Fluthori�e Signature By Mayor and City
Recorder -- General Telephone - Bridge Widening - Greenburg at Ash
Creek
7.4 Accept Public Improvements:
a, Smithson Storm Sewer Improvements - Resolution No. 88-73
b, McDonald Acres Subdivision Improvements - Resolution No, 88-74
7,5 Approve Partial Buyout of Citicorp Computer Lease -- Res, No, 88-15
7,6 Rece5u Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board
(L.CRp);
a, Authorizes [lid Request For Street Projects;
b. Approve Request For Prop944s: City Center Design Consultant;
a, Motion by Councilor FAdon, 3oconded by Councilor tdwvards to
approves the consent agonda aa3 ,%mondod:
Item 7,1 ,b to be tabled to August 15., 1988.;
Add Ream 7.1,d, Munie spool $e,rvicou/Contraactu Policy Report;
Amond tho Prw po'dFal au submitted for lj.om 7,6 b. ,.
0 in ttlo scaction orititlod "tlacktlround $action," rofaronco
shall bo neado to t.ho Portland State Univear-aity Study. The
Design Consult-,ant shall be roquirod to roviow this study
for foundotion of their work
0 In thea toct.iun ont:itlod "t;uk►iriit.t.al Roquiromontu," thorn
uhall bo an ot3rocimrnt: uC►0cifyin,4 thea number, of houru which
will bo upont wurking with tbaea City Contor Plan Ttaak Forea.
a Ono moptint3 botwoon the. now rants former consultant shall be
x9rood upon,
Thea motion was Appruvod by unanimous voto of Council present,
t
Council mc)ot-inq rocassod; Mayor called thea 1>oe:4►1 C ontrtc.t Rcovi.eaw Bo*rd to
ordor.
8, 135th AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT" DISTRICT 810 AWARD
F
a. City Engineer rcaportod that bids for thea 135th Avcanuea Local �
Improvement District had beam oponrd and eavhaluotod. Council
rocuivod a summary of the bids roceaivod, City Engineer f
reacommondod that the bid bu awarded to the law bidder, Dirt and
Aggregiato Intiarchaango, Inc, in the amount of $999,628.80.
b, Motion by Councilor 3ohnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon to award
the bid to Dirt and Aggregate Interchange, Inc. I
The motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present, i
I
s
Local Contract Review Board was adjourned, Council meeting was reconvened,
Page 3 - COUNCIL. MINUTES - AUGUIS 8, 1988 �
7
9, CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 88-16 - AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL PARK
ZONE SECTION OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (TMC) (REQUESTED BY PACIFIC
r_ REALTY ASSOCIATES
a. Community Development. Director reminded Council that the proposed
ordinance would amend two areas of 'PMC Industrial Park Zone
Section:
1. Reduction in the amount of landscaping required from 25 to
20 percent of the total area.
Z. Addition of hotellmotels as a conditional use in the I-P
zone,
Council decided, at the: July ?5, 1988 meetin,J, to add a condition
which stated that bed and breakfast- uses would not be permitted,
b, Councilor' Johnson noted concern over the preservation of the
light industrial zone ,area, availability of light industrial land
was rapidly shrinking, She advised her disagreement with the
proposed ordin,anc a did riot: mean she had a problem with tho intent
of the applicant but that sht� felt ea need to protect the xoninq
dosirgnzation.
C. 5E':C OND READING: ORUI NANCC NO, 60-16 AN ORO 1NANCC, 10 AMLND
SUQSLGT"IONS 10,60,040, 18,68.d5O, 4nd 10,190,150 OF TICARD
COMMUNII'Y ULVE:.1..0E'ME:NT CO( E, -^ 1 NDUS1 RIAL PARK TONE' (70A 00-01)
RCQUE�STTE�D BY PACIrIC REAt.TY ASSOCIAI E:S,
d , Mation by Councilor U,dwardu, uecondod by Cc)uncilor rAdon, to
adopt Ordinance No, llp 1fi.
1'he motion wars approved by as majority voto 1); Councilor
Johnson votod nay,
e, Councilor rdwards noted hu wAu in favor of tho ordinance ecu tho
amendiiwonlo wore► roquoot,od by tho dovolopuro for onhcanc.emunto to
their, buoinovu, Mayor cuneurred with Councilor Idwardo,
to, PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION FROM JULY 10, 1900 - TRANSPORTATION
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Q. the public hoatring had been cl000d on July 10, 1900, Council wao
now considering a► rcasolution to call for a spociral olection
concerning a traffic arofoty improvemont bond moature to bra paid
through a 1.0-yoar property tax levy.
b. City Engineer summrarizod this eagonda itom. He notod that the
Council had received in their meeting p6ekot a %trout improvomont
project list which had boom revised in ,accordance with the July
18 discussion, (See memorandum submitted in meeting packet; from
Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer, to Mayor and Council dated July
29, 1989.)
Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES _ AUGUST E, 1988
9
1s
C. The Council discussed amendments to the wording contained in the
Resolution as proposed. (The proposed amendments are contained
in the motion made for approval of the Resolution below.)
d. City Engineer noted that contingency amounts had been set aside.
Further, since all of the projects cannot be built at once, furAs
will remain in bank account to accrue interest.
e. City Engineer clarified that McDonald Street would not be
widened. The original proposal had been that a continuous turn
lane be constructed; however, during the series of transportation
meetings, it was determined that turn lanes would be provided at
intersections only, whether or not to put in -sidewalks and
bi.kepaths on both sides of the streats (McDonald now has a bike
path on one side of the: street) would be determined during the
design review process.
f, City Engineer noted that there would be an opportunity to do
noise mitigation work on Durham Road, Costs estimates included
allowance for changing they road grade where possible and
augmontatiun of the existing buffor walls. He reported thcAt w0st
of the trees along thea Summerfiold wall could remain.
et, Peaul )+eavirland, u685 sW McDonald Stroot, Tigard, Oregon,
rommontod that he had visited with property owners $loncg McDonald
$ttre at. Mr. lioavirliiind notod that in one of tho a►roAs, whur'ea the
road dip%, an adjacent pr�oporty ownor has Won unable to fill tho
area becauso of its dovitgnAtion an Sear►siti.vo Laend,
Mr. IOeaavirlond said tic, hopod there city would rerlviso proporty
ownors on how they would be offoctod by the bond inauo, He
vu(nostod thtat a survoy bi.) conductod in thea :arqpra anei cautioned
that, without input fr,wm thin neighbors, the chances of the
approval for tho proposed bend moasuro would not bo „god.
h, Mayor odvinead that thero will be a #ariav of neighborhood
meratings this fall tk) gathor input. City i.:n%irrurar noted that it
would be difficult to sand out survoyors to stoke the arca, as
sueg,ovitod by Mr, Hoovirland, bofuro tho dosign wo'd finvalizhd.
i. RESOLUTION NO. 8Q-76 A RESOLUTION OF 7'14G TIGARD G'ITY COUNCIL
CALLING I"OR A SPEC]AL I::L.E.C:'tION 10 ISUBMI:'I TO 1'HC REGI>7IRI `.D,
QUALIFIIi0 VOTCRG OF 7IIC CITY A 7RAI"FIC AND At`LTY ImPROVE.MLN'T
BOND MCASURL TO BE PAID THROUGH A 7E::N-YEAR PROPLR7Y TAX LEVY.
J , Motion by Councilor Johnson, secondod by Councilor Eadon, to
approve Resolution too, 88-76 6 with the following smandmonts:
1. After the list of projects shown in tho resolution, thra
fallowing wording was to be added; "arid such other projects
as Council may approwa after the above list of improvements is
completed."
2. Section A should be amended to read as follows: The Tigard
City Recorder shall be, and is hereby authorized. , ."
f The motion was passed by unanimous vote of Council present,
l
u
page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 8, 1988
1i. ANNEXATION POLICY
a. Community Services Director sunmiarized this agenda item. She
f advised that it would be logical that all the property within
Tigard's "Area of Interest" would become a part of Tigard at some
point in the future. As a result, Council had commissioned Urban
Services Studies in the two large areas (null Mountain/Walnut and
Metzger) which determined that services can be economically
provided as those residents choose to join the City. Since the
benefit of annexation would be mutual (to the property owner and
the City). it seemed appropriate to alter the Planning Fee
Schedule,
b. On July 21. 1988, Council discussed altering t1►e fee schedule in
order to encour-49e annexation throutjhout Titiard's Area of
Interest. and more particularly in they Active Plan Area, Thi3
would be done by eliminating the City pr•acessil'19 foe for all
annexations within the Area of Interest, in addition to the City
picking up the Boundary Commisuion foes within thea Ti=,lard Active
Plan Area, Council Also discussed implPnwnt,in.i the now policy on
a 50 percent retroactive bases for thane annexations which
occurred in VY 07-08,
,
c, Tho propeasod rosolution amondod thea fou schedule.* to Accomplish
the ,abovet, Staff rocon►me►n(jod that Count,11 gkdopt the pr apexed
rpuolution which would eliminates than City pr'oce�suin9 fva within
the Titjard Area of Intorout and pick kip the noundAry Cummiusion
foo for, applicants within thbt ar.t:ivea Plan or-ou and rofund
pwr,tions of feces trolls+clod in 1987.418 fisc41 yo*r,
d. RC'SOI 110N NO. RE'SOLU11ON 01 1111, JIGARU COUNCIL AMLNDING
RESOLU TON NO, N7o ®XEi� BY AC)JU`.oTING F1`1 S AND CMARGt TO KIFIJ.,tlT
C11ANG[".S ]N COSI S f OR 7ONr. CHANGE. ANNEXATION" .
,s, Motion by Councilor fdw*rds, se.►condod by Councilor ,Johnyhon to
adopt Resolution No, 4!4Z7y_.
Motion war o►doptod by unami.mous v0t0 of 00une it pr"ent,
12. MUNICIPAL SCRVICES/CONT'RACTS POLICY ("this iteam wrav movod to thio
consont ogonda to racaive and fila, zoo ItIom 7.1 d.)
12, FAREWELL C.0MMENYO/PRESCNTATIONS TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR, 809 1CAN
a. Mr, Tim t',wer•t and Mr. nruce Cre$t were prosont reprosonting thea
Motropelitan Arcaa Communication Comn►issi0m (MACC). Mr. tweet
rood MACC Resolution No. 88-07, Mr. Ewcrt and Mr. Cr•ort thanked
the City Administrotor for his contributions to MACC,
b. Mayer thanked the City Administrator for his service to the City
of Tigard. He presented Mr. 3oa►n with two pl0quea5 as tokens of
appreciation for the City Administrator's service to the City of
Tigard.
Page 6 COUNCIL MINUTES = AUGUST 8. 1989
c. Deputy recorder read the text of a "Resolution Honoring Robert W.
Jean."
d. RESOLUTION NO. 88-72 RESOLUTION HONORING ROBERT W. JEAN.
e. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to
adopt Resolution No. 68-72.
The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of Council present.
f, City Administrator gave farewell remarks to Council and the
citizens of Tigard. (Note, The: text of Mr, J'ean's remarks etre
in the City Council packet for this meeting.)
14, CITY ADMINISTRATOR EXCHANGE COMMENTS
a. City Administrator commented on his recent City Administrator
oxchange trip to Enilland. lie noted that the experience was wall
worth the time and ener•,Jy,
15, EXECUTIVE SESSION: Tho Ti-�ard laity Council, 9:06 PM reconvened into
Executives Session under the.► provisiOns of OR .: 192,660 (1) (a), (d),
(e), and (h) to diacuss City Adminiutr-al.or selection, labor rolvat:ionu,
real proporty transactions, +and currant, wand pvndint,1 liti�tAtion iauuos,
16, ADJOURNMCNT: 9;54 PM
Approved by tho lig+sr•d City Council on ;�4ptumb4�r 2ta, 1AAA,
Derxaty t,ity 11eri►rd4r n City of 11i9drd
AVY'f OT;
R
Mayor — City rjf Tir *� ;
cw/6a9AD
page 7 — COUNCIL MINUTES -- AUGUST 8, 1988
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal
P.O,BOX 370 PHONE(503)664•03W Notice 7-6694
BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising
*CITY OF TIGARD + E3 Teamheet Notice
+PO BOX 23397 + C] DuplicateAffidavit
TIGARD, OR 97223
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLII7adt � ` IW*'csd ser your inhatirmtloo,
i W1W utortrAtion aad tasy tmm the CIqr fR or
SPATE OF OREGON, )ss ctsr, ufl0 S�+' 1 fttivd..')'tif�rd, or by Tufa$ff3fi-It71.
COUNTY OF WASWNGTON, )
CM COUNCIL ff OL)L."M8rfCr11+IG•Attu 51 Im ' {
d:30 PU Study StAk,4-7:36PU'Reitular s�nfl
beingfirst duty sworn, depose and gay ti TIGAKD CMC CtN'Ji P-R,TOWN HALL' y�
P 4}c
Diretor,or his principal clerk,of the.--! ; 13136 SW HAt3.f9�t11.>6�1fA ,x'it3l►R�
a
newspaper 9f poneml circulation As d' #
and 193.020; published at P(7 C w lnxpt rastalrt3faatl• aAf kdtifid[ "If m DA X11 f
aforoaid ►t !e; that the
•At1Asl�atloo Policy•C4�oe of Grdfsaa*Ammll tR fr
a printed copy of which Is hereto annoxo • Ondfm"muk" ti=4116om/PiciffeRsaW-Sscamasaft '
et►tirefest+o of sett newspaper tor, ONS,L&M C4401Vt Review Jfttd-fi3 Ave.fDCW Imps �
consecutive in the following issues, Aaatd �¢
f ovo f�A•under the Pr"Waf i of ORS 191m(1)�a)td),t; ), �
, i3
no to d of kw Wil r"101:101101 red pr
Atlt t) pr""trsas ►
tlm&mW�atud pttf>udf W&W tWA&
City Admialstmtor
Tl1f •-ftb.ANSM 4,IOU'
8ubs� nd oc`iMytD before me thisn.®. AtT0US,
t
tory Public for Oregon
MY C06T4"-&4 140z,,9/20/88
AFFIDAVrr ' `�
CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
�:. In the Matter of the Proposed
fi rt- r ?cc �7 Gt• AIC. ag-- ItP
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss
City of Tigard )
1, being first duly sworn, on
oath, depose and say;
That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, A copy of
Ordinance Numbers) -!
which were adopted at the Council-Meietrng date
copy(s) of said ordi ance(s) Bain hereto atta .had and by retprance mada a
part hereof, on the day of Igor,
1, Tigard Civic Center, 19125 S.W. Mall blvd. , Tigard, Oregon.
2. U,S. Notional Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon
9, Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, S.W. Mall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
4, Al.bartoon0a Store. Cornor of Pactfic Hwy. (State Hwy. 99) and
S.W. Durham hood, Tigox'd, Orogon
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of �.� 19
`I:
6tary Public for Aragon /J
My Commission Expiras, LT
r
4
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 88— RP
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SUBSECTIONS 18.68.040, 18.68.050, AND 18.130.150 OF THE
TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE — INDUSTRIAL PARK ZONE (ZOA 88-01)
REQUESTED BY PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES.
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its Community
Development Coda periodically to improve the operation and implementation of
the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning staff made recommendations of findings to the City of
Tigard Planning Commission on July 5, 1988; and
WHEREAS. the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of a modified ZOA
UB-01 at this same meeting; and
WHEREAS, The Tigard City Council held a public hearing on the proposed changas
on July 25, 1588,
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Sect-tan 1: That Community Nvelopment Cuda shall be am►andod .as shown on
Exhibit "A". Languagu to be dolotod is shown in [BRACKEIS],
L.annuaga to be added is ONAER41Nk p.
Section 2: That this ordinance shall bo effoctivo tan and after the 31st
day after its passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor,
PASSED: By --M �vote of all Council mombors profiont
after be r►g rw d by number and titla only, this ��� day
of r, JA19DD,
IC:r► orino Whoat'lay, Doputy Roc dor
APPROM: This day of
Thomrs M. Dri*n, Mayor
A roved as to for
In 1
y Attorney
Data
ORDINANCE N0. 88-W
pag@ 1
y E
L w
f EXHIIIII "A"
18.68.050(5) The maximum site coverage shall be 75 percent, including
buildings and impervious surfaces. The maximum site coverage maw be increased
to 80 percent if the provisions of 18.68.056 are satisfied. ,
(6) The minimum lands aping requirement shall be 25 percent of the site area,
except that a reduction to 20 percent of the site may be approved through the
developMent review erocess when all of the followinq performance standards are
met
A. The aeproved land sca a len shall rovido-
J Street trees. as required by Section 18.100.035 are to be
installed with a minimum calf er of 3" rather than the 2" at
four 4 feat in hei ht re uired by 18.1004035(a).
The landsca in between a ark inq lot and street property line
shall have a minimum width of 10 feet.
All applicable buffering, screening setback ra uiramonts
shall be satisfied.
0. The applicant ll provide documont,ation of an adaguate on-goinii
mat n ananco rogranLto ensure 4pp!:9prriato irri kion and ma nn,amm� ,a
of the landscape area.
16169,040 Transier►t L dgin3
18,180.3b0 R. , iraneiant Le�3 ^"� r%,,L►'i ,:.p nas,
tes #ra sh }}n�Wp min,„mum r twq ®ac�,ro.TL_ nd max mum P_f
f vp nrea,
El,�, '�.P! ,.�.�F►��,1 h►a.uaP.,,.��es+s» �.��o��rq.l►ud !►y�„rt.t�►a,,.��tlt,
�_r���►��.r�..n,t�?�.�,a�ri ar��'sC,�;�'� r n�a�2�,,.,r��. "��>P�t!m�'l'�wry?
lea
J►qrd., .niep S��e�� nL 00
' x�rp�► 11mf a�t�ane�in, �,c�c,tlnri._18,.�,�,A�Oj9���,
_sknfarm tE 0ha Ler 1 A_ +f i ht�.. L:.�t !
klwcl _and bre�►kT+�u M!�ne� ,�h►,tt _o► ?o .r� a�^ml�t_Wcl
.
s..��..� _ ... .W
ew/6a92D
jh
f,'
.. i
AGENDA ITEM 0 C" --VISITOR41S AGENDA DATE
(limited to 2 minutes or less. please)
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items, The Council
wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda. but asks that you
first try to resolve your concerns through staff, Please contact the City
Administrator prior to the start of the meeting, Thank you,
NAME S ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTAClIED
` ✓'� C JI/C;7:.=c��^ ��'1/ s/�I��t �,' f .i+/i� �:�: ,. r,�►&C4�"Ot,l'
r CITY CIF TIGARD
NOTICE OF DECISION
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUR 88-16/VARIANCE V 88-16
FEICHTMEIR/WARREW-UGH (KEY PACIFIC)
APPLICATION: Request to develop an 88,125 square foot office building and
variances to allow parking spaces of 8 feet in width where 9 feet is required
and to allow 1 access driveway where 2 are required. Property is zoned C-P
(Commercial/Professional) Location: 31308 SW 68th Parkway (WCTM 1S1 36DA, i
lots 100, 101, and 102).
DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Director's Designee for the City of
Tigai37as APPROVED the above applications basad upon the findings noted below.
s
A. FINDING OF FACS' j
1. Background
No previous land use proposals have been reviewed by the City
regarding this prop@rtv.
2, Vicinity Information
e� Atlanta Street abuts the property to the south, 68th Avenue Parkway,
t a minor collector, borders the property to the west, and I-5 runs the
length of the eastern boundary of the property. To the south and
southwest the land is also zoned C-Pe and the opposite side of 68th
Avenue Parkway to occupied by the Oregon Educational Association, A
mixture of offico and residential uses Are on the south side of
Atlanta Stroat. Lane to thea northeast is within tho Portland city
limits and propgrti@s to the north and northwest are zon@d C-G
(Comm@rcfal. General) and are occupied by a PGS substation, mo€@l,
r@a€auran€s, and other coma#rcial usa_e,
3. Site Information and Proposal Description
The site is predominantly tree covered with a mixtures of deciduous and
coniferus tre@4. The majority of the existing evergreen trees Iia on
the northern portion of the property. A drainage way crosses the
northern area as well, running downhill from 1-5 toward 68th Avenue-,
Parkway. The supplicant is proposing to develop an 88,125 square foot
office building which will include a 361 space parking arils on the
northern half of the property. One driveway is proposed to provide
access to 68th Avenue Parkway. Future phases are anticipated which
would expand the uele to approximately 133,000 square feet with 481,
parking, apacen.
The present request for the 88,125 square foot office building .and
fNture expansion# wi void the draina.geway which crosses the north
Portion of t e property. Yar an oot
wide parking spaces whe!rr� a oot wi t e� re u re an to a
one a ro ect where! a proJect of this size would
,require two access drives.
NOTICE OF DECISION - STAR 88-16/V 88-16 PEICHTMEIRNARREN/PGE (KEY PACIFIC)
PAGE 1
4. Agency and NPO Comments
The Engineering Division has the .following comments:
a. The subject site has frontage on 68th Parkway and Haines Street.
68th Parkway is a recently improved major collector street and
Haines Street is an improved overpass of Interstate 5.
The submitted site plan shows one access onto 68th Parkway at the
south property line of Tax Lot 102. The Community Development
Code requires developments with more than 100 parking spaces to
have two 24 foot, minimum width driveways with curbs and a 5 foot
sidewalk. Phase 1 of this development is required to have a
minimum of 252 spaces and the ultimate development is required to
have s minimum of 579 spaces. Therefore, two accesses are
required to this site. The capacity of the single access could be
increased to offset the necessity of the second access by adding a
turn lane exiting the site and center turn lana on 68th Parkway
for enterir►g tho site. Access to Maines Street is not feasible
due to tha steep grade down to the site and the +axistanca of
aev@ral large osk trees.
Since the construction of 68th PArkway, weeds and scrub bushes
haves grown between the curb And sidewalk and need to be removed to
provide: padeastrinn Access and to pre:ve_nt deterioration of the
aid€wAlk.
The applicant expressed an interest, during the preapplication and
Application meetings and discussions, in altering the work shifts
and the hours of work In order to relieve the p*Ak hour congestion
on +adjacent streets. This is strongly oncourAged by staff-
b. The site draina into Red Rock Creak which flows to the west under
68th Parkway. The existing i.mprovomantsa to 600 Parkway provide
adequate capacity for the increased runoff from the development.
However, the crossing of ked Rock Creek under 72nd Avenue is not
adequete to handle the increased rur►off. On site retainage and
detention of storm drainage water is a possible solution to
mitigate the increased runoff but is generally discouraged by
staff.
c. Sanitary newer in available in 680 Parkway to serve the site.
The Duilding Inspection Division, Nortbweot Natural. Cog, Metzger Water
District, Ce!neral Telephone, and Portland Cet►erAi Electric all have no
objections to the proposal,
The Tualatin Rural. Fire Protection District has no objections to the
request as long an acceptable width# are maintained for acetes.
No other comment# have been received.
NOTICE OF DEC7.SIOM - SM 88-1.6/V 88-16 YZICHTMEIRNABBER/PCE 0= PACIFIC) -� s
PACE 2
t
F
E
8. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION F
4
The proposed development is consistent with applicable provisions of the
C—P zone, building height and setback restrictions, landscape area
requirements, and parking standards (252 required/361 provided).
Additional discussion
is varianceanted regarding the�requests. and the proposed landscaping plan.
futurephases
drainageway, �
for the project.
1. Landscaping
Because of the significant slope on the site, a substantial amount of
grading work will havt to be done in order to accommodate the building and
the parking and loading areas. The landscaping plan notes in a conceptueal, I
manner that existing trees will remain where possible between different
parking areas and along the draina€,eway. However, specific trees and
detailed methods for preserving those trees have not been identified.
Prior to the commencement of site grading and preparation for utilities,
an arborist's report should be submitted which indicates the trees to be
preserved and the methods for proteaction. At a minimmv; the trees
earmarked to remain should be protected by a #erica or similar matins during; i
the course epreserved construction.
whe!res possible a in
conformance with Chastaff will be pter 18.150 ofrefts
tbO �
will be p d
Community Development Code-
2.
o e.
4
2. Urainagow9y
E¢¢
i
The drainsgeaway identified along the north side of the property isdesinat �
propoedeavelopmeant will sensitive
avoid d this earea and ethe Comprehensive
seadraineageway should not
be affected in any way.
F
3. Access Va risme
Section 18.100.150 prescribes standards that the Dirpstor may uses its ordejr
to grant variances to access requirements. Staff finds that the proposed
access in conjunction with the condition# recommended by the Engineering
Division will result in a cafe access and with proper vision clearance.
Also, the additional phases of the development to the south will provide a
secemd common access to the entire property.
4. E%C@ tion to Parkine steandards.
Section 18.120.1.70 of the 7Code! grants -thee Planning director authority to
make exceptions to parking dimensional, requirements if it can be found
that certain benefits will be derived from such a modification. In this
Case, the applicant is indicating that the reduction in the parking spsca
width is necessary in order to preserve as many trees an possible on the
.site, and also because the spaces will be used for office workers she will
be typically parking once for the entire day. Therefore,. the extra
maneuvering apace afforded by the nine foot width is not critical. Staff
finds in this cage that the reduction in parking space width is minimal
and will help preserver trees by reducing the amount of pavement necessary
to accommodate the number of vehicles anticipated.
?NOTICE OF DECISION — SDS 88-16/V 88-16 FEICHTMEIR/u /PGE CM PACIFIC)
ME 3
i
S. Future Phases
Future expansion plans are anticipated for this development, however, a i
time table for such an expansion is not clear at this time. Also, the
information provided relating to the expansion is conceptual and the staff
is not in a position to grant any approvals for those future phases at
this time. An additional Site Development Review application will be
necessary when it is time to construct the future phases.
C. DECISION
Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning Director's
Designee approves SDR 88-16/9 88-22, subject to the following conditions:
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL
BE SATISFIED; STAFF CONTACT FAR CONDITIONS 1-7, GARY ALFSON; CONDITION 8,
KEITH LIDEN (phone 639-4171).
1. The applicant shall remove all woods and scrub growth along the site's
frontage between the sidewalk and curb on 68th Parkway, and any
additional vegetation to provide a safe sight distance of 400 feet
along 68th Parkway for vehicles exiting the site. Visual clearance
easements shall be obtained from Tax Lot 200 if required for eight
distance.
2. The applicant shall be required to provide a second acceaaa to the
site, along the 68th Parkway frontage, for the ultimate development of
the alto. The Applicant shall be roquiread to rest;ripe 68th Parkway aa9
pert of Phase I improvements to provide a center turn lane. The
striping and signing plan will be provided by the City Engineer, The
Applicant shall also be required to provide aaa right turn lane and A
left turn lane at the single access to 68th Parkway in Phase 1.
2. The applicant shall: provide for roof and parking lot rain drainage to
the public stormwater drainage system or by an approved on-site system
designed to prevent increased runoff onto the adjacent property.
k
Storm drainage runoff shall be disebaargrd into the existing
drainagrway►s without si.gnIficantly impacting properties downstream.
The applicant #haall upgrade the crossing of Rad Rock Creek under 72nd
Avenue to provide for full development of the entire drainage basin if
on-site ,deetention is not utilized.
4.
Sanitary oewer And storm drainage details shell be provided as part of
the Public Improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of
the storm drainage basin and sanitary newer service area shall be 7
provided as a supplement to the Public Improvement plans. z
Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable
area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed and future
lines shall be addressed.
F
E
NOTICE OF "=Ion SDZ 88-16/Y 88-16 FEICHMIRNARREN/PGs OXT PACIFIC)
PACE 4
S. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed buildings to the
public sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to
connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system.
6. Seven (7) sets of pian and profile public improvement construction
plans and one (1) itemised construction cost estimate, stamped by a
Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public
improvements shall be, submitted to the Engineering Section for
approval. Two (2) sets of plan and profile plans shall be submitted
for preliminary review prior to submittal of final plans.
7. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until
after the Engineering section has approved public improvement plans.
The section will require a 100% Performance Assurance or Fetter of
Commitment, the payment of a permit fee, a sign installation/
streetlight fee, and a developer-engineer agreement. Also, the
execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance
agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of
Approved public improvement pians.
A. The bike rack design shall be approved by the Planning Director.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SITE GRADING, CLEARING, OR TREE REMOVAL*
THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED (STAFF CONTACT, KEITH LIDEN)t
9. A detailed landscaping plan Phall be submitted for Planning Director
approval which includes locations and types of trees to be saved, an
arborist report including methods for protection during construction
And maintenance of Long-term health of the trees. The trees to be
saved shall be protected by fencing or almilar means approved by the
Director during construction.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL
BE SATISFIED (STAFF CONTACT, KEITH LINEN)t
10. The tree preservation progrsm rind inatallstion of additional
landscapinR materials au itemised in the approved detailed landscaping
plan shall be ccmplsted.
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONSt
11. All parking spaces shall, be a minimum of 8 feet in width.
12. A separate site development review approval shall be required for
phases 2 and 3.
13. This approval is valid if exercised within I. year of the final
approval date.
NOTICE OF DECISION — SDR 88-16/V 88-16 FEZCHTM 1 /WAP.REN/PGL (KEY PACIFIC)
PAGE 3
D. PROCEDURE -
1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall
and mailed to:
XX The applicant & owners
XX Owners of record within the required distance
-W_ The affected Neighborhood Planning Oxganitration
XX Affected governmental agencies
2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON AuRust 16, 1988.
UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
3. Appeal; Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in
accordance with Section 18.32.290(4) and Section 18.32.370 of the
Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must
be filed with the CITY RECORDER. within 10 days after notices is given
and sent. AppeAl foe schedule and fora are available at Tigard City
Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon.
The deadline for filing of an appeal 38 3:30 P.M. August 16s; 1988.
4. Questions: If you have Any questions, please call the City of Tigard
anning Department, Tigard City Hail, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , PO Box
23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171.
PREPARE By: Keith S. Liden, Senior Planner DAZE APPROVED
(ht/6337D)
411
FMa 9
NOTICE OF DECISION -- SDR 88-16/V 88-16 FEICHTHEIR/WARREK/PGL' OW PACIFIC)
PAGE 6
N�
d _
CITY OF TIGARD
NOTICE OF DECISION
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SDR 88-15
JOHN S ROSE TENNANT — (VAN DOMELEN/LOOIJENJA)
APPLICATION, A request for a Site Development Review approval to construct a
40,000 square foot warehouse building on an existing foundation on a 2,48 acre
site zoned I—L (Light Industrial), Location: 7325 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1
12AB, Lot 1300),
DECISION, Notice is hereby given that the Director's designee for the City of
Tigard has APPROVED the above decision subject to certain conditions, The
findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted below,
A, FINDING OF FACT
1, Background
No previous applications have been reviewed by the Planning Division with
respect to the subject property,
2, Vicinity Information
v
Properties which lie immediately to the west, south, and east are also
zoned I-^L (Light Industrial), Properties immediately to the north are
r zoned I-H (HAavy Industrial),
3, Site Information and Proposal Description
i
In the early 19001 a fire resulted in the destruction of the Dickinson
building, a m+snufocturar of jams and jellies, All that remains on the
site is a concrete slab,
y The applicant props-)s@s to construct a 40,000 square foot building on a
2.40 acre par€@l. 'Phe sit@ platin shows a total of 57 parking vpa€@s and
16,400 square foot of landscaping, Two accoss driven on Bonita Road will
sarvica tha vita,
4. Agency and NPO Comments
Portland Gonorol Electric has roulowad the proposal and has no ubjOctions
to it.
Washington County Fire District No, 1 has reviewed the proposal and holes
the following comm@nts:
Automatic sprinkler protection is requirod duo to fir@ flow and UBC
requirements. Hydrants will be required within 500 foot of all
portions of the first floor and 70 foot of the rDC.
The City Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has the
following comments:
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW — SDR 80-15 (VAN DOMELEN/LOOYJENJA) — PAGE 1
The "daylighting" of stormwater to the existing drainage ditch should
be verified as acceptable (i.e., whether the ditch is a
drainageway). The location of the handicap parking stall should be
relocated nearer to the main entrance.
The Tigard Water District has reviewed the proposal and comments:
To adequately serve this new warehouse building, a new o inch main
must be installed laterally 200 lineal feet along the east side of
the building, terminating with a fire hydrant and a fire sprinkler
system and 2--inch meter. The water district has three mains along
Bonita Road: 24 inch, 16 inch, and 6 inch (all on the south side),
This building would be served from the 6 inch main. Estimated costs
will be $8.550.00.
The City Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and has made
the following findings:
The applicant has submitted a preliminary site utility plan. The
proposed sanitary sower is connected to an cKisting manhole at the
southwest corner of the site.
The applicant has proposed to drain the site with two storm drains
that outfall into an oxisting level ditch within the adjacent
Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, The ditch is overgrown with
brush and overflow* to an +aKisting 18-inch storm drain that combines
with anathor 18-inch line at a manhole. A 12-inch line carrion flow
from this manholes under the railroad right-of-way to a small crook,
No drainage calculation or other evaluations of the adequacy of the
drainage facilities have been submitted. Propo#od on-vita storm
drainage facilit:ias are not in conformance with they Uniform Plumbing
r Code,
The site fronts Bonita Road immediately east of the Southern Pacific
Railroad. The vertical profile of Bonita Road across the railroad
tracks is substandard according to currant dooign criteria, A
proliminary profile of Donita Road indicates that a fill of
approximately 5 fo@t shall bo roquirod to ei@vaeto Domit.ee Road east of
the railroad crossing to meat current design staendearAs,
The General Telephone Company hat rovie:+wed the proposal and has no
objections to it.
No other con►monts warn received.
0. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
1ha proposed dtavalopmeant, is consistent with Community Development Code
requireamonts for landscaping, seatb*cve v, site covarago, building height,
parking, and allowable uses in the I-L zone. Additional discussion is
warranted pertaining to vision clearance and access rtqulramants,
SITE DEVELOPmENT REVIEW -- SOR 00-15 (VAN DOMELEN/LObIJENZA) - PAGE 2
Vision Clearance
The vision clearance situation for the two access drives on the site has been
reviewed by the Engineering Division to determine whether the existing pine
/ trees will pose a problem to motorist and pedestrian vision clearance on the
lF site. They have indicated that the trees will pose no vision clearance
problem but that they may be removed in the future due to the probable
widening of Bonita Road.
Access and Egress
Access at the southwestern corner of the lot only measures 20 feet in width,
whereas the Code requires a minimum access width for two-way traffic: of a
minimum of 24 feet, It appears the landscaping at this point could
conceivably be reduced minimally to allow for adequate access width. Also,
the 12 foot wide driveway in front of the building should be widened to 24
feet, marked as a one-way drive, or eliminated.
C. DECISION
The Planning Director's designee approves SDR 88-15 subject to the following
conditions;
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. STAFF CONTACT FOR CONDITIONS 2-8 IS GARY
ALFSON, CONDITIONS 9-11 is DEAORAH STUART (Ph. 634-4171),
2. The applicant *hall provide roof and parking lot rain drainage to the
public stornwatewr drainage system or by an approved on-site Ayst.em
designed to provent runoff onto tho adjacent railroad rights-of-way,
A permit or evidence of acknowlodgmant by the railroad shall bo obtained
allowing discharge of *tormwatear onto the railroad property. On-site*
drainage shall conform to the Uniform Plumbing Code including pipe size,
slope, and catch basin typo,
8. Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the Public
Improvoment plans. Calculation* and a topographic map of the storm
drainage basin sorvicea area shall be providod as a supplomont to the
Public Improvemont: plans. Calculation# shall be baa sod on full
deavelopmeant of tho sarvicoubla area, The location and capacity of
existing, proposed, and future'* lines shall be addreassead,
4. This applicant shall provido connection of proposed buildings to the
public sanitary seawara►go mystom. A connection permit is raquiread to
connect the existing public sanitary seawor system,
S. An *greomant *hall ba eaxeacutod by tho applicaant:, on forms provided by tho
City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or romonstrato
against a future Local Improvcmont District formed to improver Bonita Road.
G. Five! (5) sets of plan and profile public improvement construction plaans
and ona (1) itomizad construction Brost; cstimaatea, stamped by a Registered
Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements
shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval, Two (2) seats
of plan and profile plans shall be submitted for preliminary review prior
to submittal of final plans.
SITE OEVELOPf4EWT REVIEW - SOR 88-15 (VAN DOMELEWILOD22EN3A) - PAGE 3
7. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until
after the Engineering Section has approved public improvement plans. The
section will require a 100 percent Performance Assurance or Letter of
Commitment, the payment of a permit fee. a sign installation/ streetlight
fee, and a developer-engineer agreement. Also, the execution of a street
opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to,
or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans.
8. A profile of Bonita Road shall be required, extending 300 feet either
side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future
grade. The western driveway onto Bonita Road shall provide sight
distance of 250 feet between a vehicle traveling east on Bonita Road and
a vehicle exiting the driveway from an elevation 3,5 feet above the
pavement for the driver and Y feet for the vehicle, the driveway shall
also be designed to avoid future grade problems when Bonita Road is
improved to current design standards.
9, A revised site pian shall be submitted for Planning Director approval
which includes the following; 1) a minimum driveway width of 2+4 foot for
all two-way driveways, 2) relocation of the handicap parking space closer
to tho main entrance.
10, landscaping materials shown on the landscaping plan shall be installed
prior to occupancy of the building,
11. All signs intended for this development must have City—approved sign
pormits prior to their erection.
12, This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final docision
date noted below,
D. PROCEDURL
1. N t ca: Notice was published in tho newspaper, postod at City Hall and
mailed to:
xx . Th@ applicant & owners
_XX Ownors of rocord within tho rogvirod distanco
_Y,__ The affected Neighborhood Plannir►12 Arga►niration
xxAffected gova rnmental agencies
2., f_1naj ecision: THE DECISION SHALL nE FX.NAL ON ���,r���.w UNL,ESS
AN {APPEAL IS FILED.
3. a : Any party to the decision may appeal this docision in aaccordeance
with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community
Uavelopment• Coda which provides that as written appeal must ba filed with
the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is givon and sent. Appeal
fee schedule and fornix are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall
Blvd., Tigard, Oregon.
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW — SDR 98- 15 (VAN DOMELEN/LOOIJENJA) — PAGE 4
The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M. Axpwt 15, 1St,
4. 2uestions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard
Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., PO Box 23397,
Tigard, Oregon 97223. 639-4171,
PREPARED BY: Deborah A. Stuart, Assistant Planner DATE
2 -a Z -I&
Keith S. Liden, Senior Planner DAVE APPROVED
(ht/6006D)
.Y AIIMMM. /1
I 1
w Yurt.
17 1
� SITl; 1
1
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW -- SDR 98-15 (VAN 00HELEN/L00wENJA) — PAGE 5
r ter'! r
il - = � rlrr r�rrr
t ��� rr�■ �rrr.� „rill rr® ; -
4 +� ►, ,� �•_ � r rr r
` ` rri�r► 'Mir�,.�== �z:
'"��►�► �► rr/ ,rte, ° �!!
iK �''►� ern ..
""ON ,
*Isla
rim
4
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO; Honorable Mayor and City
Council August 2. 1966
FROM; Loreen Wilson, Recorder
SUBJECT; Council Meeting Quorums
An update to the council meeting quorum list would be helpful in xchedulinq
meetings through October, Please take a minute to indicate those meetings you
won't be able to attend.
Cathy will ask you for this list Monday Qvening, August 6th, If you have any
changes to your schedule, please call Cathy or T, Thanks!
AUGUST 25th
AUGUST 22nd
AUGUST 29th
SEPTEMBER 12th ...
SEPTEMBER 19th
SEPTEMBER 26th ..
OCTOBER 10th
OCTOBER 17th
.00TOBER 24th
lw/6212D
CITY OF TIG^ARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: August 8, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: August 1. 1988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: PREVIOUS ACTION:
Keys to the City _
PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet
DEPT NEAP 0GITY ADMIN O R
"` EQUc..:(E:p E3Y: ,Mayor and Council
POLICY ISSUE
Keys to the City are presented to citizens who Fiave served on a board or
comittee in recognition of their, servico,.
..._........................... ,. _._.,_.____.....,...,,....,m. INFORfIriTlCiiU SUMMARY
'
m .
The followirq people are beint. r oco-3nizod for their service on a board or
committoo"
Chris Doffurdint.) City Corner Plan Tasty f'orc.o
David Clomont Cconomic Dovulopmont Conunitt:oo
Sura Carvor Library Board
r
Durone Thomas Libr,Ary Elu.ard
i
Connia Smith Neit1hborhood Plonning Or(3, NO
a
..,..., ,.....a ..,..,m ,m� n....... ..
..... .........
....
a{(t
P
MR
w..u_.a...,.,.ww.u...ww..w....�.,,.. ..�.uw....u._.�..W.wuw.uuuuuu...u..wuw..w..wu.,,.,.f.,'SCAt�..u]MPACT
.... _.._ -.w�owu....ww+wwawn..w.✓ .....wv -.._�....-..r.rr..u�.ru.u.....w.+•-. _. .. ..uww.ur.+w�i+w.wa......ru... - ... •. --�ww.ur�wwuur
,..�.r�r._.. .......�.w......................uw.r...uu........ r .......r...��w....+...._urrrr.r._.r..._........+........r -- �
L
SUGGESTED ACTION
Presentation of "Kays" by Mayor.
dc:6218D Q
t
(r
E
t
CI1Y OF TIGARD. OREGON
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council August 5. 1988
FROM: Bob Jean, City AdministriLor
LX1
l '
SUBJECT; COUNCIL CALENDAR. FY 1487- 88
Attachad is an updated tentative calondar• for this fiscal year. Official
Council mout.ings are markod with an asterisk M. 1'vo put question marks (7)
along sido those still nooding Council OK, If generally OK. we can procood :and
make spocific adjusimont.s in tho Monthly Council Calendars,
August-''qs
,98. Mon Council Dusinvuu (i5ond:a (6:30/1:30)
13, Sat: Tualatin Crawfish festival (Tuial , Comm, P�,ark)
O1'_r, Mori Council $1.udy Pwler►da (030)
0(22, Mon Council Gruuinouu Agonda (6:30/7:30)
29, Mon CowneiI 'Study At3onda (t):30 pm, CD Conforonc o Room,
Dinnor with Holun Novi ow Rwsumos)
!a, Mon No C:uunciI Moot in(3 (tobor• Dray)
*12, Mon Cuunr,il Buuinuus Atjonda (6:10/7;30)
*19, Mon Council Study Apnda (6:30)
21, Wod MACC Mooting (1 :30) — 1loovortun Library
V26, Mon Council flusinesu A onda (6:30/7:30)
�Gt,c�k�e�r 'tits
+4Oct Noighbor-hood lawn 1141% 7
3, Marc No Council Meeting
*10, Mori Council (?usinoss Agondra (6:30/7:30)
10, M'.)n Columbus Day
0,17, Mori Council Study AgondA (6:30)
19, WE►d MACC Mooting (1 :30) — Roavor•t:on Library
*24, Mori Council Fluuinoos Agenda (6:30/7: 30)
31, Mori Hallowepon
31, Mori No Council Moeting
Novomber_._.'.88
7, Mon No Council Meeting
9, Tues Election Day
12-15, Sat-•-Tuos League of Oregon Cities Conf. in Portland
X14, Mon Council Business Agenda (5:30/7:30)
16, Wed MACC Meeting (1:34) — Beaverton Library
*21, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)
24-25, Thurs- Fri Thanksgiving Holiday
28, Mon No Council Meeting
Council Calendar -- Page 1
i
December '88
?Vec Council Goals Workshop?
X5, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)
#112, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30)
X19. Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)
21, Wed MACC Meeting (1 :30) -- Beaverton Library
26, Mori No Council Meeting
26, Mon Christmas Holiday
3anuar `89
2, Mon No Council Mooting
2, Mon New Year's Day
16, Mori Martin Luther ding, Jr. Holiday
Fobr,uAr , 189
14, 'foes Valontirie's Day
20, Mon Pr as idunt'5 Day
March 109
17., f'ri Lit, f►at.�rick' s t)cay
24, f r,i God Fr dAy
26, t3un
14, Sun Muther'a Day
29, Mori Mcimor•i4►1 Day
Jur►u 109
14, Wod F lag Day
29, Mori Mumyra�al f),ay
29-11-1OR
A, Tuns 3ndopondUrtce fray
sc+ tomba►r• 189
h, Mori Labor Dray
October '._02
31, Tuos Hi►llowoon
Nov_embor_ '89
23-24, Yhurs—rri Thanksgiving Holiday
December_.'89
25, Mon Christmas Holiday
mhO028a
Council Calendar - Page 2
Vol
4,
1, a^
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
�v
Tp; 1Honorahle Mayor- and City Council August 2, 1988
FROM: Loreen Wilson, Recorder1)�
UVICV., Consent: Agenda Items 4.1?'& 4,2
These itoms will ba delivered in your supplemontal packet for the Autjust Nth
meeting. 'chis is scheduled to be dolivered Friday evonirq, Autlust. 'b, 1M.
lwl6212D
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON
TO-, fionurable Mayor and City Council August. 5, 1988
1=ROM: Bob dean, City Administ'ratur//NOOJ 11
SUBJLCT7, Dull Mountain/Walnut Urban Services Study
Attached is the final draft of thy; Boll Mountain/Walnut Urban Services Study,
Since your, t,oview of the draft in tho Springy.1, the following itoms have been
mod i f i od
1 , betters or response to the draft from othor• jurisdictions havo boon addod
to tho oppondix, UpdaVos throuqjuut tho toxt of tho study have boon addod in
reoponse to not.od issues and concerns of tho juri»dictior►a;
2, lnformation has boon updatod for 'Tualb+tin Hills PcArk Mnd Rocroatiun
Diutric.t, Unified Seworatjo Aioncy, a►nd enh+ancod service district costs.
Aftor, Council rocoivo sand filo action on Autlust 801, st:.aff will forward thea
final study to intorostud jurisdictions., N110 I13, land (310 04 ,
lw/6212D
CirfOF T11FARD
c-REG-0- M
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA
URBAN SERVICES STUDY
June 14, 1800
Propared By
City Administrator's Office;
Robert W. Joan, City Administrator
Ron Nagy and Chris Lin,
Public Administration Graduate Studies Interns,
Lewis and Clark Collaga
13125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171
CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON
BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA
URBAN SERVICES STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pale
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
oFindings... . . , .... ..,. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .... .. . . . . . . I 1
o Planning and Annexation Issues.. . . . . . .. .... ... . . .. . . ... 3
oConclusions... ... .... . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . ... . ..... . . . .. .... 3
oRecommendations.. . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . .. , .. ., . . 4
o Annexation Comparative Cost/HouseholdSummary, . . , . , . . . . . 5
o Study Data Summary. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .I — , 7
o Comparative Capital Projocts Resources. . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. 8
II, STUDY AREA
o Summary. . , . , . . . . . . . . . . , 9
o Land Use a►ndDevelopmentPat•terns. . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . .. , . . . 11
o Natural Features. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 15
o Transportation Network. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 1 ld
III, URBAN SCRVICES
o Washington County "County 2000" Plan. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . 19
o Police. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 20
o Road Maintenanco. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 21
o Suwer. , 21
o Water. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 22
o Fire Protection. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 22
" o Planning and Development Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
o School Di%tricts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
o Park% and Recreation, . , . . 25
+a Libraries., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
o Other Sarvice%q. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 26
IV. RCVENUES AND EXPENDITURCS
o Summary, . I . . . . . . . I . . . . . . , . > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
o Revenue -- Expenditure Droak-Evan Curva. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
o Rovenuo Expenditure Croak-Even by Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
o Projactod Not Oporatir" Budget Rnvonuo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
u Capital Revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
V. APPENDIX, STATISTICAL TABLES AND MISCELLANEOUS. . . . .. . . . . . . . 35
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
BUIL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA
URBAN SERVICES STUDY
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In April 1987, following the decision by the South Metzger/Washington Square
area to annex to Tigard, the City was contacted by developers in the Bull
Mountain area about annexation. Tho City Council discouraged an annexation
proposal at that time, citing the c 'S lack of specific knowledge of the
area's needs and the City's capacity to serve. Council directed the City
Administrator's office to conduct an Urban Services Study of the Bull
Mountain/Walnut areas,
FINDINGS
The basic data gathering was dune by two Public Administration graduate
students from Lewis & Clark College during the summer of 1997, The final
report was completed by the City Administrator's office and reloased in Draft
for review and con►ment in February, 1999, The Final Report was released in
June, 1989, The basic findings of the study are;
1, DEVELOPMENT OF THE BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA IS OCCURRING AT A
COMPARATIVELY RAPID RATE,
o Thera are currently 955 households with 2,137 residents in they Study
arena;
o The planned density allows 9,496 households for about 23,700 residents,
more than 10 times the currant population;
!u+ o Uevelopmont is proceeding at a comparatively rapid pace with 607
housing units platted and another 365 units in process, or a doubling
of tho current population within 5 years;
a The area cantoins approximately 2,045 acres zoned mostly at County R-6
(6 units per acre); the area is largely undeveloped;
o Traffic donsity on Dull Mountain Read and Walnut Stroa t will increase
at 20 percent per year @each yoar for the next five years and then
faster each year after that until reaching planned densities around the
yoar 2010;
o Bower and water service either' exists or is reasonably available with
development;
o Fire protection is provided by the Tualatin Rural Fire protection
District and can servo projected devolopmcant;
o Parks funding is nonexistent, recreation services are available to as
vary limited aaxtont through the facilities of tho 'Tigard School
District or by annexation to the Tualatin }tills Parks and Recreation
District;
o Storm Drainoge services are minimal and downstream impacts of upstream
development are potentially significant.
2, T'HE COUNTY'S ABILITY TO SERVE THE AREA IS RELATIVELY LIMITED.
o County planning services are directed towards major transportation
issues rather than community planning. The result is that local
( planning services are limited largely to case-by-case plan review at
' the time of application, with 'little staff time available for
long-range community planning;
1
o Police services are provided by the Sheriff's 0ffice through the County
Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District by a special district levy of 65#
per thousand providing one officer per 1,000 citizens; -
o County services available at County Courthouse, Hillsboro. 25 minutes
distance;
o Local road maintenance by the county is not presently available, but
may be funded by a county local road maintenance district special levy
of $51 per year, per household;
o Major street improvements are through the County Transportation
Improvement Fee (TIF fees) funded as a condition of development, but
Bull Mountain Road and Walnut Street may not be eligible for much
significant allocW.on of TIF fees;
o Storm drainage ;; not provided in most of the Bull Mountain area
because it is still essentially rural. Recently approved subdivisions
have been required to install storm drainage facilities, as a condition
of approval, that are adequate to address their immediate impacts and
to accommodate future growth, The County does not currently provide
for area-wide storm drainage and potentially significant downstream
impacts, although a County Storm Drainage District and a $2 per month
per household fee is under study;
o Parks and Recreation services are available through ;annexation to the
Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District ('$1,47/1,000 tiax rate in
Fiscal Year 1987-88);
o Street lighting is available through County Lighting Districts
averaging $4-$5 par month, per household,
3. THE CITY CAN PROVIDE KG11CR LCVELS OF NEEDED SERVICE.$ TO THE AREA UPON
ANNEXATION AT A COST COMPARABLE TO OR EVEN LESS THAN COUNTY CHARGES,
o Residants outside city limits pay but "abandon" about $!�5 per parson,
per year by not being in a city. Joining a city entitlos them to their
share of cigarette, liquor, franchise fees and other revenues at no
additio"I cost, totalling more than $117,000 per yoar (55 X 2,137
$117,535) to the area,
o Revenues from the area would exceed current City direct costs of
service, makieyy excoss not revenues available for needed capital
investments in the hull Mountain/Walnut areas;
o City services availablo at the Tigard Civic Contor, 5 minutos;
o City Police services are 1/3 groa►ter at 1 Officer p@r 750 r'csidonts
compared to the Sheriff's levy at 1 Deputy par 1,000;
o Annexation to Tigard includes long-range land use planning and public
facility programming rervicas from the City;
o Library services are assured to City residents, but available to those
outside the City only as long as the WCCLS levy continues;
o City Systems Development Chmrgas (SDC's) collected from dovalopment are
targeted by the City b*ck into the areas where the davalopmont
occurred. Improvemants to Bull Mountain Road are astimatod to cost
S3-5 million and Walnut about $2-3 million, City SDCs from aroa
development could raise most of that amount (9,600 units X $600 current
SDC feeo = $5,160,000). Tho County has no Parks funding mechanism.
Development of the area inside the City would generate $2,150,000 (fr250
SDC x 0,600 units = $2,150,000) For Park land acquisition, groanway
preservation, bikeways and other Park improvements,
2
For similar services on a $100,000 assessed value home in 1988-89 the
differences in the Bull Mountain or Walnut areas would be:
Service County/District City (after annexation)
t Police $85 (@ 85f/thousand) $200 included in City tax rate
Street Maintenance $51 (@ $51/year) estimated at $2 per 1,000
Street Lights $48 (@ $4/month) ($2.03 actual in 1987-88)
Storm Drainage $24 (Q 21month) $ 18 (@ $1.50/month).
Sub-Total $208 Bull Mtn/Walnut $218 Tigard
Without Parks. . .
Parks included in
Parks & Recreation $147.,(T.H P.R.07) a0- City Rate
Annual Cost $355 Bull Mtn/Walnut $218 Tigard
PLANNING AND ANNEXATION ISSUES
Growth and development is occurring under currant Comprehensive Plans, with or
without the adequate Public Facility Plans, The City of Tigard is currently
e developing its Public Facilities Plans for Streate, Sewers and Storm Drainage
systems, The City has offered to work with the CPO to jointly develop or
expand upon the needed facility plans for the CPO area, as the City does in
the NPO areas.
The City realizes that the issues of planning and annexation are aaparat.e, but
related topics. While annexation is an option for obtaining needed planning
and other urban services. the City prefer% to leave that choice to individual
property owners and residents. Believing that Bull Mountain/Walnut areas will
eventually choose to annex -- whether in i yours, 5 years, or 10 years -•- the
City is, tharefora, genuinely just as concerned as are currant residents that
the area be developed in a logical and livable manner,
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, the land use and annexation i%%uw% affecting the arae are
separata, but related. Davalopmant is occurring undar currant con►prehonsive
plans in the !lull Mountain/Walnut area with or without mnnaxa►tion to the
City. City levels of urban services either ara not availabla through the
County, or ort* available more conveniantly and bass expensively for comparablo
services from the City of Tigard upon annexation, County Transportation
Improvement roes (TIF) ara collected as development occurs, but are used
County-widca, rather than baing dadicot€ed to thea arra from which collected,
City Sy%tvms Development Changes (CDC) cern be targeted by the City to
i,mmadiaeto area impacts. Noodod street improvements, like Bull Mountain Road
and W;%lnut :treat, are unlikely in the foroveaable future without annoxa►tion
to the City prior to development.
Since annexation allows a one-time multiplier amount to be added to the City's
tax base (aonnoxing area assessed valued X City tax bane rate - $ added to tux
base), it is potentially to the City's short-term financial advantage to
consider annexation of the area after it is fully developed. But: tax baso
considerations are just part of the analysis.
3
f
Annexation of the area sooner, rather than later, offers the following
advantages for the affected neighborhoods as well as the City:
o "Abandoned" revenues at $55 per capita bring in $117.535 the first year and
over $1 million extra the first 6 years at no extra costs per household: 1
o City service costs city-wide become even more efficient following
annexation of the Bull Mountain/Walnut area, further reducing City tax rate
costs for all properties an estimated 5--10 percent below authorized levels:
o City services are higher and costs are lower than County Service Districts
for comparable services;
o City long-range land use and public facility planning could help guide
development to a more desirable outcome under current Comprehensive Plan
provisions;
o City Systems Development Charges cannot be collected and targeted until
annexation, Meanwhile, County TIF fees are being collected from the area
but allocated county-•wide, not targeted to needed improvements like Bull
Mountain Road and Walnut Street.
It appears that the total Bull Mountain/Walnut area may eventually choose to
annex to Tigard, If annexation happans somewhat later, that works somewhat to
Tigard's short-term financial advantage, Meanwhile, each year without
annexation means the loss of TIF revenues out of the area, continued loss of
abandoned revenues, and the continued lack of long-•range Public Facilities
Plans coordinated with the Comprehensive land Use Plans, driving up both the
community's and they City's long-range casts,
RECOMMENDATIONS
Bmserd on the findings and conclusions of the Bull Mountain/Walnut Area Urban
Searvices Study, the following is recommended:
1. That, annexation proposals front the Walnut and Bull Mountain II/North
ws Central areas be supported by the City and roquired before allowing
connection directly or indirectly through City sewer lines;
2. That, onnexeALiun proposals from the Bull Mountain I/Southeast and Bull
Mountain N/Sout.h Central araas be supported and oncoura►ged by the City;
1. That, annexation roqueats from Bull Mountain III/Northweast areas be
discouraged until annexation of the Walnut and Bull Mountain 1-1.1 areas
are substantially completed and adequately served;
4. That, consistent with the first two recommandat ions, as much choice as to
timing and logical annexation units be left to individmal property owners
and rosidants, and thereforra, that tpmaor8rily irregular boundaries and
piecamool annexations ba alluwod, viewing the antira Study Arca as the
evontuol_ logical boundary. Creation of islands or the inclusion of soma
minority parcels should also be given consideration by Council when more
logical sorvice delivery would result, All lawful annexation methods
should be loft available to individuals and property owners, including an
annexation election of all or major parts of the Study arca.
5. That, prior to annexation, the City attempt to of'f'er and provides as much
Public Faacil.c-y Planning and long-range planning coordination service as
possible consistent with County and CPO desires. The better the plan
coordination, the less urgent is the pressure on the City and the arca for t
Immediate aannexa►tion.
y4p
Revised 6/14/88
" BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREAS
ANNEXATION OPTIONS SUMMARY
{._ WHAT ANNEXATION CHANGES?
SERVICE CURRENT AFTER ANNEXATION
POLICE o Washington County Sheriff. . . o City of Tigard Police. . .
o 1 Officer per 1000 residents o 1 officer per 750 residents. ..
with Special District at 85¢ 1/3 more Police Service than
per thousand special levy. .. from Special District. ..
o Emergency responses around o Emergency Responses average
5 minutes with Special District. . . under 3 to 5 minutes.. .
o Records/Roports located at o Records/Reports located at
Hillsboro... Tigard Civic Center. ..
o School Resource Officer
Programs_
STREET o Washington County Street o City of Tigard pay for existing
LIGHTS Lighting Districts.. . Street Light districts, , ,
o $4 per month/$48 por year average o Paid by City from Street funds. . .
STREETS o Washington County. . . o City of Tigard. , ,
o No local street maintenance now o City maintains local streets
or form local street district: from gas taxes. . .no fees. .,
at $51 par year extra. . . o Development NDC fees dadicated
o Development TIF fees go towards inside the City area.. .
County-wide project prioritiou. . .
1 SEWER BILL o U,S.A, rates. . . o U,S,A, nates. . .
o Unified Sewerage Agency bills o City of Tigard bills monthly
annually on property taxes. . , par our U,S.A, contract. . .
STORM o Currently no County service, o City of Tigard Storm Drainage
DRAINAGE , under study at $2/month. , . utility now at $i.50/month. . .
PLANNING, o Washington County Dept, of o City of Tigard, Community
BUILDING Land Use 6 Transportation at Development; Department at Tigard
ENGINEERING Hillsboro offices. . . City Center. ..
o County CPO Plan. . . o City adopt* CPA Plan. . .
o Limited long-range planning. . . o Full City Planning and Cngineoring
services. . .
LIBRARY o WCCLS Library Systom only if o Tigard Library open to City
Tax Lovy continuos. . . residents @von without; WCCLS tax. . .
GENERAL o Washington County Commission o Tigard Mayor and City Council,
with one local Commissioner. . . all locally alectod. . .
o Hillsboro Courthouse. . . o Tigard Civic Cantor. ..
5
Revised 6/14/88
WHAT ANiNEXATION DOESN'T CHANGE
SERVICE CURRENT AFTER ANNEXATION ,
FIRE o Tualatin Rural Fire Prot, Dist. o No Change, stays the same
WATER o Tigard Water District o No Change, stays the same
SCHOOLS o Tigard School District o No Change, stays the same
PHONES o GTE or PNB o No Change, stays the same s
POST OFFICE o Same addresses and zip codes o No Change, stays the same
PLANNING AND ANNEXATION ISSUES
Growth and development is occurring under currant Comprehensive Plans, with or without
the adequate Public Facility Plans. The City of Tigard is currently developing its
Public Facilities Plans for Streets. Sewers and Storm drainage systems, The City has
offered to work with the CPO to jointly develop the needed facility plans for the CPO
area. as the City does in the NPO areas,
The City realizes that the issues of planning and annexation are separate, but related
topics. While annexation is an option for obtaining needed planning and other urban
services, the City prefers to leave that choice to individual property owners and
residents. Believing that Bull Mountain/Walnut aroas will eventually choose to annex
whether in 1 year, 5 years, or 10 years -- the City is, therefore, genuinely just as
concerned as arra current rosidants that the area be devoiopod in a logical and liv&blu
manner,
COUNTY "SERVICE DISTRICTS OR ANNEXATION?
Under the County 2000 Phan, countywide servic@s are to be paid from county-wide funds;
local services must either come from County £pct€ial Service Districts or annexation to
the City, Annexing to tho City provides more service arta a lower cost than buying thore
same sorvices from County Eorvice Districts, F'or similar sorvicas on a $100,000
assossed value home in 1.988--89 the differ+ancas in the Pull Mountain or Walnut areas
would be:
Sore cs Countylpistrrlct_ C9t after annexation ,
Police $85 (p 85f/thousand) $200 includod in City tax rato
Stroot Maintenance $51 (4) $51/yaar) astimutQd at $2 per 1,000
(treat Lights $48 (Q $4/month) ($2,03 actual in 1987-88)
St;arm Drair►ag $ 18 (P ti .50[mnnt:h),; . .
Sub-Total $208 Bull Mtn/Walnut $218 Tigard
Without Parks, . .
Parks included in
Parks_ &_Recreation _$147__(T.H,P._R_.D?) --0- City Rater
Annual Cost; $355 Bull Mtn/Walnut $218 Tigard
6
� O
O.O•!f•D Orf ♦NS W C�O- MpQpp�wal1 m nN ANh
orw W am .rlONv.n ohay.+O� OOA
• WlP.+•CI 1C1 •!1O W Mf m OOq NN b rDhOr •6 MA OiNh
�OrM alW a V�+Nn A A 'A 4"r% nI•iM W!Of OM f wip�!1j1
•O N�tiM N W A! •P r, n Ao.y !
C'Coti % A R h aNA O
h6n ! on .r
N
N
a
•A w•hN W! a�oOMm:if !•i W!A O •O Oehl NN hOa7104
h m•fl.rMh hAh W�N �NN•Olhh ap.nf ri.Ah O Ahd" a
Qr•t1A+�W.r V.rMnrAh MtpPaNrA hNaO W W P
I+iti IAm a� A 4 «tVfW O hAN h .+9400
M n•f1 M N •D N P 111 •t1 N O N
N V.
nd1N W AI I1N�+ N •+ * NN
{ W wW pMA ���AO� r.00SNM N�tM'1ONi•D .ID N+W AN•o
q�4ws+�v.ar pa �vs ��n wo dam., +3�v�t+«e0w+� r�21M+�ne�a�
MHIgSl
in A NI}+ A ~ 1 V W IUr �p•A O wPh «
w O �D Y«
• w
N, w IA y n►
•I
7i «
fk
.... , � PNMMN �+WfMhN� r�rI iJl dl♦ .N PN. N V «wOpN•�1
w ��v.w�pp«pp �n .rW Y ! SII INMpn►I+ �14dt
Wf�MN1 tirl► dlMP
«~~IwMMJ ..� W MM1 « N!h �* wn ♦ �► «WQI�1
A YIN.+ •
N 44 40'A
/\r r
Xd wI►ti' A •�NryMV l«fi.N.r�13r PN •f1 N4w �044I �PaMP M?A ..
NAMM �Wn IqH
Mf Pn!
•
M 1M�d� «✓� w� •► dO
M « !M
N M YN
d
Ml
►ter
M yy
je;�A AJI iN�► N1A y�1A wP2F NN
j s,rnPi r IA P A/M1f1AMb i•M rf pit
�► NANh r prf ! N' APP r Is AN « nMO
r nor♦ P may « W PVN N P/wH o Nnw
•
M
w
N
w
K;
k.
O
a
LQSj y
In
0
AA n �C M w w,IGAll w �L A vMwi s
s• /- •, w.+ � cat � aw.» � cryt� « w.• O� coc wwT+ � G�t � ry
u w * p 30. 1 A* n � p��i gi L wwr ~ p�p s 4 w � p�> ti.A, .
. y KS�W� dbOptW2 tSfb«WZ "6Ib apt iris 19,6 ,8 fiprWY
m
1p m M ,-n
4.
A O
N �
o..
lw
M
N $ d
.. . . �,«
job
~ .400 o
M
Aq p �NN w`
j+G
M M �
A
a
w A
QQ 4Q +Id
• 4NN K'
x "10 �-
•
MN ANN
Oil N M
O11 A ro
N W,O
-Oe da t1 4 N
� M
n .�.o r
rp N jAd
s Ci .,f: rr tll �A e! tI N
C6 44 a 0
L U 6 C m it d M O W
Al C
V d K w N N 4
G
•. BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT STUDY
II. STUDY AREA
The Bull Mountain/Walnut study area consists of approximately 2,045 acres of
unincorporated Washington County located due west of the current limits of the
city of Tigard. The area's northern boundary follows Old Scholls Ferry Road
and the southern boundary follows Beef Bend Road to SW 150th Avenue, The
Urban Growth Boundary marks the western limit of the study area.
The study area contains 855 households with an approximate population of
2,150 parsons. The currant assessed value of property and residences totals
$97,184,500. This figure reflects only those properties appearing on the tax
rolls as of February 1987, and docs net include any reassessments or newly
subdivided properties. because of tho rapid residential development now
occurring in the null WNuntain area it is not possible to determine the true
` assassad value of the study area from tho standard sources. A reappraisal is
,y
currently being conducted by the Washington County Assessor and, applying a
formula recommondad by the Assessor's Office, the revenue ostimaetos in this
report are an a►tt®mpt to show beth tho true prevent value of dovelopabla land
as well as the provont value of underarwaraad proparty. Tho Assessor's
Office expects to complete their appraisal by Octobar 1987•
9
� VeI�SIZeC� � �CLlme�l�
Meet�n� Dake : og -oB-sem
See 35mm doll � i �rh.
i
-` Land Use and Development Patterns
Zoning in the study area is about 65 percent R-6 (Residential, 6 units per
acre) with a small amount of R-15 in the extreme northwestern corner and at
the location of the Foxglove subdivision on Beef Bend Road near 150th Avenue.
Another exception includes an R-5 designation for the Hawk Ridge development
on 150th Avenue, There is no commercial or industrial land in the study area. 6
To better describe the development patterns in the study area, we have divided
it into four subareas (see map a), Development is most prominent in the Bull
Mountain II subarea, which contains the Mountaingate subdivision, Phases I--IV,
Foxglove phases I and Ix, Sonoma Hills, Bull Mountain Park #3, and the Orcas
subdivisions. These subdivisions have boon platted and approved, but do not
currently appear on the tax rolls, After an indepth study of the development
in this area we have estimated the rate of growth and tho assessed valuo
revenues that could be generated in this area.
The other subaroas; Bull Mountain I, Bull Mountain ill. and the Walnut arca,
are not experiencing the same rate of growth au Bull Mountain 11, but all
contain large amounts of dovolopa►ble acreage. This tneludos Approximately
700 acres of land currently under farm or forest land deNrral, Land which is
under deferral is typically valued of $350 to $1,000 per acro, which is
contrasted with an avoraga of $20,000 per lot for acr,oago which has been
subdivided.
19
BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTIONS
Urban Development Housing Units Population
o Platted and Approved Lots = 607 1,459
o Recent Applications or
Projects in Process, Lots: 385 924
Additional De 9 9-9
p Current Area Households & Population
o Total Development by 1992 (7) 2
Assuming normal development timalines of Approved and In-Process units,
current area population will more than double within live years, That means
an avarage 20% increase per year each year for the foreseeable Future, on
traffic (Beef Bond, Bull Mountain, Walnut, etc.), storm drainage and other
urban impacts, or 400500 new residents per year, This development is
,occurring under current Comprehensive Plans, with or without annexation to the
City,
25,000 BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT POPULATION
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
4,000
2,000
21000
1,000
1987 1908 1989 1990 1991 1992 1.993 2000 2010 2020
12
` Natural Features
Bull Mountain is a steep-sloped landform with a flat, elongated crest area.
Elevation at the peak, just north of Bull Mountain Road and 144th Avenue near
High Tor Drive, is approximately 700 feet. The northern and southern low land
areas are more gently sloped and largely forested with a number of narrow,
steep ravines which act as natural drainage channels. Drainage on the
southern slope has been complicated by development. more specifically,
installation of sewer lines which follow the natural channels. Given the
sensitivity of the soil to disturbances of this nature, there is likely to be
further erosion in this area without the implementation of a drainage
management program, The norther low land area is susceptibla to flooding in
the rainy season, a problem which also needs to be aeddrassod before
responsible davalopmont can occur. At present there is no drainoge managamont
{ service provided by Washington County.
" The bull Mountain area has boon dovigna►t*d a critical groundwater aroa since
1974, when it was determined that groundwot.or levels wearer dropping eat a rapid
rate. The State Water RQa►our4:es Dapartmorit has m4mltorod the l€vols since
1974 and has recently dot@rminod that they aro now returning to norn►al , It is
expvctod that t,ho critical groundwater aro* darign*tiom will ba roscinded in
the n*ar futura, thareby lifting any rostrictions thaws, maey accompany that
designation.
f,
.15
t
e
Transportation Network
The existing transportation network may be described as adequate for the
current population. but it will need to be upgraded to handle increased
capacity as development occurs, The only Principal Arterial in the study area
is Pacific Highway, which intersects with Bull Mountain Road and Beef Bend
Road, both classified as major collectors, Scholls Ferry Road, which Forms
the northwestern boundary of the study area. is classified as a minor
arterial, There is currently a plan to widen and add a turning lana to
Scholls Ferry Road between the intersection of old Scholls Ferry and
Highway 217, This would relieve the congestion at the ill—designed
intersection of Old and new Scholls Ferry Roads, as well as aiding the traffic
flow to 217,
Buil Mountain Road and Beef Bond Road both carry the mo+At: significant amounts
of traffic from the Bull Mountain aroa, 'those roads are in nood of widening
and curve realignment in order to handle additional traffic as a result of
devolupmont which will food these roads in the Bull Mountain 1.1 aroa.
Walnut Avenue is also a major collector and also intersects with Pacific
Highway, Tho surface is in poor condition from tho vicinity wast of 1215t and
is vary poor at the intersection of 135th, Probably the worst road of the
entire study ares is 132nd which is in dire nood of grading,
There are currently no bicycle or pedestrian networks within the study area►
but both the Washington County transportation plan and the Tigard park plan
contain provisions for bike paths and pedestrian walkways,
16
1
All streets within the study area, with the exception of private roads, are
under the jurisdiction of Washington County. The County's policy in regards
to transfer of jurisdiction is not set. At this time, the County prefers to
retain jurisdiction of arterials and collectors, but transfer jurisdiction of
local streets.
Scholls Ferry Road is state--owned and maintained.
17
x
40
io0 ;1-,.N 1�J rt
'N•i1�aa'm'ne��� je}�, O• 1: , cJ• t• �,. i �.,,`_ + w
_�..a \«„1 Icy?ai14 �d '?.=. `' �,�� s�.�" _.x . 4.i\•�+',�F �-.. 420.s
,mop' _
'•� „X a• CA
s 000 + ,,. - " - :XT Sa
05 -ado40
�..� 34• a 1.•w•- a
im
go
Ca
iMIK a'Ka� h +y �.� �Y•1 '1� •--- 'Ry.� t7►
tL
a� �� a �� � ��� x..1;01 �.'��,p ��. ..F�i.'o+�6 ;N d��;�ytl.•.\i �3R�� � _� ' � j
I
i � ►... t a O Opp
if
1260 *" NiRDC!
�; r , i "+ • � . c "-',`�.� �� __,r.. Q•, 1160
1. a� t ' • u ' iv 'rs �'
1 ►. • t�ir• � r i •� `i� -• �1 t � ti1 .�ba ��j1P li'i • 1.
'"�� j awl i .i�.�.. ,�,�`'�• '
T1 ar
i
R+�New
!LSF NMt1001 .�•,AOA 7� . '
.�' • 7+ �'
100
r k % 1 p 00 1100 1100
rrrrrraam.am
10 0406 + aoo ; lsoo
a o
wlltt�sa/q ,,
' coo
zr i n n - ,M r FI PAC 22
LEGEND Projected PM Peek Hour
ashington � Volume br Direction Traffic VOIUMOG
ounty — Ur Trarei TIGARD-BULL MTN Area
PUBIC WORKS Proposed Feemy
i8
' III. URBAN SERVICES
Services in the unincorporated areas of Washington County are provided by a
number of special, service districts, some of which also serve area
municipalities.
Washington County "County 2000" plan
In order to cope with consistently under–funded urban services programs,
Washington County has proposed a plan to provide road maintenance and police
services to urban unincorporated areas until those areas annex to
municipalities — a process the► County views as inevitable, The County 2000 1
plan provides for "interim service" until 1992-93, at which time the County
eaxpects wnnexation procedures to be in place for most unincorporated areas and
will review to deaturmino if these programs should continue based on annexation
*,
activity and costseffectivaness.
The County 2000 plan is an attempt by Washington County to fit limited
reaaurcas to service demando in view of population growth and the oubloquent
demands on urban services which rocult. The Council 2400 concept was
davelopod by the County to fund only county--wida services with county-wide tax
revenues. Specially benefited areas or groups will pay their own way, This
can be done either through annexation or through astablishment of County
services districts. Basically, the plan covers two areas which need immediate
attention.
F
-a.
19 ':
Police Services
The unincorporated areas of Washington County have an approximate population
of 115,000 persons. Currently there are 56 sworn patrol officers to serve the
areas. Because of increases in crime and a larger inmate population in the
County jail facility, the Sheriff's Department expects the number of patrol
officers to be reduced in order to serve the necessary duties at the detention
facility,
Currently the response time for priority 1 and 2 calls to the Sherif'f's Office
are in the neighborhood of 15 minutes or more. For priority 3 ,and 4 calls the
response time is up to an hour. For some calla there is no on site response
at all. The proposed Police Service District would incruasea the patrol
officers by 84, Even this increase would not enable the County to provido
police protection at the same level as municipalities which are adjacent to
unincorporaitod areas. At the Boundary Commission public hearing on June 11,
1987, Washington County Sheriff, Dill Probstfiejld, acknowledged that the
increase in patrol officers was necessary just to maintain police protection
at a basic level. Decouse the Police Service District would be sunsetad in
five years the question was raised About job oa€urity And sense of commitment
the "temporary" patrol officars would hovea, Probstfiold's rosponso was that
they would undoubtedly bee pickod-up by municipalities who will annex the
unincorporated acre&% by yeaer 2000. This is the goal of County 2000: to
provide what basic level of urban service rosourcas will allow with the goal
of encouraging annexation to logical sarvieea providers -- municipalities,
The anhaenced sheriff patrol district will be funded by a voter—approved levy
of $0.85 per 1,000 assessed value for property owners. This translates into
$95.00 per year for a single family dwelling valued at $100,000.
20
Road Maintenance
Washington County has approximately 1,200 miles of roads under its
jurisdiction. About 700 miles, or 58 percent, of these roads are local
roads. Given the limited resources the county has for road maintenance, these
local roads are the last priority for maintenance and improvement, The County
2000 response to the problem is to create a County Service District for local
urban road maintenance which will, in effect, be a user fes, The County is
developing a method for assessing and collecting these fees but a preliminary
study shows that the average cost per household would total $51 par year,
Sewer
Sower service is provided to the study, as all of Washington County, by the
Unified Sewerage Agency. Tho only sorvico within the study area is in the
Bull Mountain 13 subarea. This area drains youth to the Tualatin basin
through the King City area, Officials at USA prodict that sower mains leading
from the study area are adoquate for projected duvolopment in this subarea and
it only ram*ins for local improvomont districts to form in +ardor to provide
searvi+co to tho south face of the mountain.
Development on the western portion of the mountain will require a pump
station. Development on the north slope of the mountain is rostrictod by the
lack of sower lines in this vicinity. Lines will have to be installed from
thy Weir trunk to serves the *roa of Schons carry Road, whilst the area north
of 135th will be sarved by lines in the vicinity of Summar Lake.
21
`• The Walnut area is virtually unsewered at this time with the exception of a
small neighborhood which adjoins the City of Tigard, north of Walnut Avenue.
By agreement between the City and U.S.A any development connecting to sewer
through City—owned lines must annex to the City to be entitled to use City
line capacity.
Water
Water service is provided by the Tigard Water District, Currently, the Water
District serves all developed areas and the master plan provides for service
reaching the entire study area as development occurs,
Pira Protection
Tho study aroa is survod by the Tualatin Rural Firo Protection District
('TR('PD) and in the northoastern corner by Washington County Fire District M1.
TRFPD has stations in downtown Tigard and south of King City. Washington
County N1 has a station just northwest of tho study area at Rousser and Wair
Roads, The response time is gonermlly within five minutes throujhout the
study ar€►a►, but improvement of the transportation network would shortan
rosponse.
r'or those aroas with firo hydrants, virtually all developed areas, tho fire
insurance ratir►g is Class 3. for areas without fire hydrants the rating :s
Clans S or 9.
22,
.. Planning and Development Services
Planning and development services are currently provided by the Washington
County Department of band Use and Transportation in conjunction with the
F
Neighborhood Citizen Participation Organization for Bull Mountain. Their ?
collaboration has produced a community plan for Bull Mountain which is very
general in nature but prescribes some specific guidelines for development in
this area.
1
School Districts
Tigard School District 23J serves moot of the study area, Beaverton School �
District #48 serves the northwastarn portion of the Bull Mountain III
subarea. District 233 lovias $12,10 par $1,000 assassed value while
Beaverton #48 levies $14.10 per $1,000.
Parks and Rocroaation
'there are currently no parks or, rocroationol fa►cilitiea in the+ study Oran,
Tha Bull Mountain Community Plan rocommonds the Community "itror►gly consider
annexing to the Tualatin Hills Park and Rocroation District or an appropriate
recreation service provider", (Sea General Design Clamant x/15 of the Plan.)
Those residents who live in the portion of Oull Mountain III within Tax
Districts 40 have accost to facilities in the Tualatin Hills Perk and
Recreation District (IHPRD), while all have access to Tiga►rd's Summer Lake
Park and other facilities within the Tigard park system. The Tigard Park Plan
provides for park facilities consisting of ten acres par 1,000 residents. The
C.
25
Park Plan has identified some area which would be suitable for parks in the
study area. The fiscal year tax rate for THPRD is $1.47/thousand of assessed
value.
Libraries
The study area, as all of Washington County. has access to the Washington
County Cooperative library System. The Tigard library is part of this system.
Other Services
There are virtually no street lights in the study area. New deveiopmonts may
join a County Street Lighting District at $4 or more per month per household.
Storm drainage management is also non- existent, A County—wida Sturm Drainage
District is currently under rtaview at $2 or, more per month per household.
M
a
t
d
§
26
IV. REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
f In order to analyze the revenue and expenditure potentials for the study area
if annexed, a detailed study was conducted using information provided by
Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, the Washington
County Assessor's Office, the regional Metropolitan Service District, and the
Portland State Center for Population Research, Using this information we were
able to determine the assessed value of the property in the study area, the
population, the number of households. total acreage, vacant and buildable
acreage., and acreage currently under farm and forest deferral, From this
information, projections were made in revenue from assessed property value and
extrapolated to include revenues from non-proparty tax sources,
These projections ware also based on development pattorns within the study
oroa. After conferring with County subdivision parsonnal and local
developers, we have estimated the rate of development. This procadura was
necexsa►ry in view of the rapid development in the Dull Mountain 11: subarea in
ardor to calculate the assessod value since this inform,stion is riot yet
availoble from th@ standard sources.
Population projections were calculated from tho number of households which
will rasult from currant development, Our projections for population at
density, which for our purposes is labeled "Year 2000," may differ from the
projections by Motro by 200x, Our information is biased on a model that
f
27
•' differs from that of Metro and was created for a more specific study with more
local information. Metro will be updating its information in the spring. of
1988 and will be soliciting projections from local areas in order to adjust
its regional model for population projections.
MOTE: In projecting revenuelexpenditure estimates, 1987 dollar values were
held constant. No attempt was made to estimate or adjust for inflation.
lw/0026a
i
}6
}1k
I
C 1
Go
J w co
• •• CO
La
W
W b
O CO Ln
\ a 7 O 41r
•4 ep O iii.-t
? 0 av
'O 0! Cl. W k
�A Cho
mM ae t
cn
v�
O
W
1
A� Aj R
40*
w
�l
OO.G 0
N y a i►C
d M
-cxA
�n in 9v,
,N E
41= Xd
p X 0,O y
29
•:•.�: �•:..,._.:� `:`�:::•;•_
4
Cl
u102unON Tingcn
' �.:`�''•, `;,•,,tip::•;:�;4•:•.�.
III uTu2unoW TTn$
cn :; ? : ;: II uTu2unoW TTnS
TPTIUOPT90H PIOSTI a
AnuiuM 'a s
a ov
CO= a .+
> v w 40),
49 A
pp d d
O t�rl O vhf
7+ a Cv N
aJ a�
tH �
a. a
N W ��Q
30
N
r
r
� r
r
W � �
W W M�1 1.i Chi
• cp y„
AJ u u y+
r 1
m an go
w
o
O a� as r� eo in cn
31
t
NQ'
Ch P
w
M H
4
32
3 N
6n allLn
in
1
o4w -AvMi ' -IVU
► opo
a
".\4
LM m
V
�1
44
d
M*t % Q
W W ~ tr1 stl Go
q!
00
ca
w
co W go
u
w
a In
$ v $
33
1ON
q C
00
e
CCIP
1
y �
coo
L
� t �
a
v
a
w
co
L°} tO� Q
in
34
APPENDIX
35
w O
Ar m
W
P Ar� N
w+
O
�. M &1 G O
M O
01
N �r
5d W W
1 � N
N
40 c4 N
pp f\ H
Ci +f1 Iw �/1 awl Al ,
p�
n O
N •t =C
� v �
�s
4A 0
J1 M P P
0.1
P O Q N M
w
yet►
M N
Y V ,
wi (V �f1
do O ^ M w V
w
W
r
•M
/h PI IB
A
f M�
ero
e. y
s 4
W LLL
Nol
so
M d
6 �
ro d a
ro
M d at b a
as .. m atat
¢$ ¢ w o
w tl M a ✓✓ O d ✓
qqC M'
✓ O N ®N
an U W ✓46
C g
rn �0 4 3 d r
pvv Ovv .sO+ Y a 7
36
C6 a ¢ �°- �°- a a '
n r r
r •D P
• CL N M M ap
•d' v v V
N a N M oO in O •r O O M N f v
M m iD n n N M
O f
O P P N aD N O g M ti N m M •r
.r •r .p •r N f i\t1
M O
.O
n f f N
f V P
v v v v
z r� M m at1
m f M .o m .� O m a m n
i N
n n
M
r O M r
P M W P
W ei IQw W P +1' .PT wNi N � K7 ,
w M % 1i 4�
v ee v v
✓M+
t 1 .ti N w
w
� P
tw A f1-f
i!1 N w
r
d N
on m to Ij
01
n t M f o ;zr N ed w f
w N N �+
w
` M N
�+ r r M O O N O .+ 6 r►
9 J N w $ N
h �
9z
.i M ! of M „ L
flc AVID
�Oa{t
N lQ b hh (� C7 �7 v C C
a 3 a e o
e CL y Aj
y y w r AR
o F o WO y e
e .d+ a°, c y� i -00 M i
w J N U d 3 Q, m N F 6 6 37
01f n O t rI S Q sn
� N
,�.. m A i M f O a,
W10
.�
r7 f ti N � A 1\t1
N
111
pN1� kn
In 4n 4A
.r 40 v GOi O
pp \
N N N M of W r1 n
N u M
r
A
ti N V bn f Is O. .! P <
j
s
• �T ti N INn t��l
M
A i A 111 i N
.y ri s It± wi N w
b. ., ..�
0-4
M
P M
M +t� A 111 i N
y � 490
A OR
A N M A N� w
1d
Afl
In
..I
w O YY++II
s..1 11'r
Y1
k
w rp+ r
y9 r=teN N► i Q
hK u 8 N W
C v N V L� f1 syxs p
.+1!+ d .•1 C h V 01
a u d At
a 6 Ah 01
$ V w ?? g
n d c
S1 C
w N d 0 K L S It G 19 QI
C a v Ap ei a 3 •�• _ r+ •r 4
j sac W O Z uQ. J2 p� a d a n
N
38
4
]Q� K k 14 &t >� K
• .• ± V co co co
V V O+ 8V + S V
O O P O O ,. f N ,
v O O O
f O;
AD pp M OOi -ZXS Q N W \ N
av w O N
m
T N N n P m
aq i1
M N
N
V
Alt
M bt
bt
4" h M aptn kn P M f
04
V + V
V V Y V
ri �pj pp Opt
i� OO O w
n fNn %100 Q
�D ^ f N o p K/ f N 4"
§ A ^ O 40
w
N f t.
aq N
w
be
ren + � +C3 93
r •Y n W M � wl 1�1 Al W M
n
iw
M 04
pw
N Q M M n
W
7y pw
V
q ^
w .;
~ Y 1h
yy Cw
M y
M
1M1��j
O � ja
� p A • M.d
Ao 'Zbj
M
• � N b A T "ti �'IMp
M • M �"� C b
N
ID
c eq AD Tw
02 1w w
CL Z
16
dr Y
.r N
w _ h
9-4 to in ev
6 6 K d N _.2 �t:.r .1 h N N N�iY �/h f L V ¢ t) S
fi d'1 .Z�p ti iO %40 v V v h Y CA v N U W V 3! d C E
of O h 4 A O O fK w N ft to tc.r k 40 K M
• U U oil d !4e $ LL.
n
n M f
• • A f at: 01
N A A aD
G N
N %C a.1 Q A O ti O N O N
,I .a C
! 01 o It " O
Al a.'1 m aD A �
111 N N A 471 f 01 10 A .Ma A n -n
P,
n
1, ~
, A n
($ A
N A A ap
i®p �Oaa .Ny eA.a aD O A N O N all ¢ p f ! M
� ay 1p N ti � a71 N P O aA
N %a
m
1 a47
n
A IA at A
f O f f
a.e aA N 1/
f` am n
w W w O ! ! w N O +� N it Go An C4N A P n
It
49 w • J11
�1 W PI R ill w ! 914 w N � r An
b N N Y1
w wi PI 1D
v ar v v
N w N. i0 i11 ?o W � ►w O h iA 6 N i�fr1/ H if1
M
(/ W n O P A C aNA iq ♦ in0 a► !AP ®� ® ♦ ifl
ifl
N
n baa /a is
.r O 1f1
p N +A P
R.1 N ni wi w
A�. v v a►� v
M N w +w b w n► * n !w� r4l f i9�
~ 0 M O ! N ,11 1lGq iM N 1a1 M In M /NI``i W
(V N N iai f pa aP ill N
r
Ia
- � N 1► N 01 .
A o.1 I/r
Ik N A !r{ a
L v ao v Q
00"
Jf k X11 R P 10 INf1 tP
fl1yy, y� rt M a d A q N P N I Ifl N N !
I~ w p1 N M a.1 O. OR
a i,Q
ONO
�M '
w
to to
p A r M A
! q
(/ G A K ri •�+ d 1100
K � w C6 A > 0 y6
O d AJ co u co � C7 � .1 cl O C A 09 N d
M ty .r l d 0
d w
N 6 l M K O' 4 77 w W 3a _1
OG O A u 40 J fJ73 p a Z' X IL cc VJ i2 a R 40
• •t • Q A O n m N n n ! Q N .. ...
00 y� �p N I� �D O n t
C v Ar h m M N Q N
N .y v N N b N M
w M94 ca ds
,y m
N
NV4
w n ® M N N_ f 94 qw
9D N
w Q v O V P 1i1 n N O T
b r e
P N .ti N �i1
M
H
r
i`.4 A
N Vqr
N A K K fel
d .� N
wi
' A AP
J1 A A A �tl�t11 N M w
M Q w: ��► O �t1 P .ir �'f
i►
T MY
w
.. W 44 N � 4h11'f 6 M
ii s
IN � MI A N ii N
f�
AM10
PNS N� h a w!1
' � �i ai ~ •i � a a
u :
v..
N
AW
AJ
d M b Q b ip L v O ii b 17
F" K O pp •.+in
Y K •.�
d 6 w F% L G D v w
W Y d
w ►e d O ft n. L S A O
C D: +Vi
oS �p
W B a v J
41
• m m
x
A
• � V P
pQ N O +w
A i .011 O
n
A
t R
V V
i N a m a N "
W 1? N u1 N i
A A
1/ V
.ti N R
• W A M J1 w I
M A
V V
a
� w
• q Y an O+ N
IM it y
r
w
40
04 fj F w
A M � M �1 is ,1•
f I
v „ r
ro M •. N
b w
9[ MUU N
�! w L
N v
e :1 Ad
1. A ...
6
N C d V U .+ , w u l«y L Q
rri
JNO U W v Qa Ly
. .ison
+ Lt
N O v v O fCl iff Y OL. 0
r
N q
n f
N A M 4
1
44
1ti • u �: P o P
O
n f
n
N M M
O ai aC7 as V 4 D O f e t n M W N m 7
N P P P PN M n n P n f P OD N rl y
177 aP .T an n �++ Cn f N Q N K7
H §
f a 1n
i CD M P W
N i/7 v q aa In a a V' f �/ N M Oi N N J7
iOfi Q Ifo tP+ .N+ � t N N 177 �w A A
a .1 ww N too wl N IH w1 � aJ1
• i1 iA y1 4
P N ip f9�
v v si w
M
rig �V pM� iN W ® A � f • A may+y. $ pi M N M7
wds A � � !a M P1 +► N � N arl i M Ifl A
f+ A
f
N Al M V
y arir td V Q p ,1y
flr W hh wr /M ♦ 1V G7 N Y'1
�.1 w9 N M M N IA �+ µ ++ •
N
n
t+ M n A
in N7 w wl f N O N 1f1 A
�p 4 w wr N Af Al N H7 sy Ifl .
ah a N
M
W
�
on
A 1A If1
'may' t9 f N Al O d FI O N
C [► d
v d ~ V 4}i
�. ... rx
bb
p H d M S O
y~ b N
tY It
.+ A�y a d 7 2x >< �' w s
u ~ R x w ry� .4.0 93
a 6 s D -0
.. C dr y v L 14- '� IL7 ro� 'ti Oco Ah co Ogg at 4A
AA
C U I1 ~ u 7 v GFo 2 .�+ G 4 ~ {; x
ade 01 v a"7 i .� M L ' r c o $
n
sg g a m go t- 43
0. a
�r
cif a l
v1 f O N N }a{
S I I I I I I I I I I
L M hO r ti
fM�
r /r
r+
C �Sy M06
Jf
04
04 4p Aj
04
tt S r+ W
C C ` w v w 7p L
M
C 6 IL. f n S. O �'^ O V W L d
C K Y0 K l� R O '� .�. 1 .. a r 2
Ww
01 6
44
oS �
m N p O �bC N
t7 aNN G8°D
O m C% 1�
{ ap Q 191� Cr1 aD a0 M
O m ti C
f N J f ` Oa
M o 0
L. M ti t7 N
n
^ m a21 f
m M
� M
a n O a
m
N
M ^W1 A 4" D M M R
1
QQ� yob. gyp?~ QQ QQn
•awn Q Q M a G G all A
M O s .D O O 1t N O
w I+p.QNyV QJ h V, a • ^a t P
►� w D N N .ti N V �D aQ �
N
v
a�it N
of N s^t
M A M M M M
l N
O 0 p J1 9D
j� R iJ��T1 it i1� ni O sT A �Q1 A W
M 9 e!1 90 w� Vi q i7 1 N N
V9 Mj N N a N •D
N M
P. h
M wo ✓
N 4
V M �✓
41
w
N
M r! V
M w
P1
ok
to
e,
N 66do "
N n M AJ
„1 3V M
Y f�
,W b
r AA
.e n
at
Ift
b N f
N M
P V
M
u a
AA
rs
P
d1 /Myt pot �p1� 4yY r1
• w�L d u u w u u O C O
6 O > 4 w 4 4 ¢ • .. O S L
i .n !� a 'J m A O •� N A O •-/ N N •.4
AS t1 p!V 1% m N M m w A A a 7 m A A A y W L
fa M M 104
I u l 1 I C ++
« ..N o. Al-.n m1 d 1
A as
o
.0 O A ! �w
O pvv Qm A A w m A A
N +ID A b
p p
m u
a o b 8 n
�l1 .Nr N b Obi n b
at N r N b D A rn
.o
I* C14
N N M f b b N D \
N m ~ A
in In
f
N1
A b m
V M V V
w u g M a N a n a Ln n o N� a �.
b N b n A N A 1 !�
N W N f n n n P f 1� b W \ A
cli C f in N .Dw �tf 1i1 ti N N n
.r
.r
n r
lbrl A
�W f O. n
n N � .n � m O 4A iii 1t1 ;WD N R +A vn
+y
P W V P
w w w w
O404
O
A A T +f+ A
n
A pn .�
N H
L1 wj A M �
A a # A
i9 'W N
W -
YW7 f,
d A M w
N "� 6
w w
oft ..
N N1 f
0
1F M A 4" �P
w y w46 V
ae i s ryQ
4 p° �nl w JP1 a i IoV n�i w!1+ fobh
M M A r P A5
Z A M M
P on
A �
N
cc
Q a
C~C V C cc
~ % icy X n +YgGi gpdy� 7 IV
6
w 4 O 94+ C \ 7
.. ri m v c a
►-
N ♦ •
W .v r b rti
f\ e \
N Zn ♦r N Q an
a� N
R
In r-4
O�
v n to \ +4
C n V 4 O n
sn N w N R
A
' A
a♦w./ a 4p Vl 1Nra pNi ail A
4V to
• w N •� m
N � rrl N
H
P+
QQ w
�ijj,, �p� A M •1' � f Irl
N 444 N
V
dd R
i�
0.4
N 1B A !H 4+f I+1 Or M
a t N .fir N Ni
e.r
r
rw
1D f N A
v
r
a
r r� M
C A+ A#
44
�+ M
8 *U m x`fl q
rl a d
1 pl r
.i, 6 a b a !. O •• O Y a W L d
C cc Y 9 x 4'• L.
..e L O d d
U) oa a o o
W Q 6v v J V F- N v H a 6 u
47
v"cL7VNIAN, IHUMSUAY.AUGUST 6.1987 ® 4M M'
.Street of _ rearms only a start for ,area
ey"rm ALLEN apparent hostility toward the dr
eO Peftd-4 n"o..w opment.At a held for
TIGARD--More than ioo,000 idents on thehome show�j
People are expected to attend the a before the show's opening.she st
Street of Dreams home show this 2 many comments reflected won,
{ month on Hull Mountain,but area STREET OF DREAMS S about the beauty and size of t
residents and city officials are look. DIRECTION MAP homes and speculation about w
ing beyond the summer tatllc to theQ the new residents would be.
development's long-=ante signifi• 4 "i'hese people will be our nel
cane for the community. O hors."she said.
City officials say they have no N Thee neighbors.and their nein
Immediate plans to capitalise on the borboods.would make a tine ad
$5 million development or the traffic tion to the city,according to E
it will generate.But city representa• 71GARD Monahan.Tigard director of co
tives and members of the local munity development.
neighborhood association agree that d Me�that
that
construction
takingplace an area
become Tigard is a positive thirst
Five other Monahan said."it carries a Daft
amount of prestige,and the addid
subdivisions have ,� of thou
rtlyb gdbigh usinaadd
been approved. �� higher of to our hot
the subdivision is just a taste of BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD Monahan suggested that t1
--�-•-- Street of Dreams development cou
Five o iubdiv subdivisions on Bull r "µ spur more highcost development t
Mountain— MOUNTAIN Bull Mountain. "Though it
an 90Za3ffRMW_s71VEW1nGATE could
alt already
future d mi
vo y was n ton County prompt more annexations Boone
wi the last a0 moathu With an it's natural for those nelghborhor.-
b to want to Ann"to the sty for ser
qro o the development 4s u just outside ioec"
!u door.the city undertaken a STREET OF
study of the arca that may be a pro)• DREAM► p Tigard oillcials may be ud
udetoannexaton. �, having the show in their ares
"We're very pleased to have the Froudo conceded,But sae addod:'
Street of Dreams in our communi• think the Street of Dreams moat
+ "! said Tigard Mayor Tom Urian. who Livia trereRorent t stone poop,
p,
Even though that arcs is not within arrant in the Mountain 's o e am&
;y our sty limits,the people who Uv* bdiv
"We are ath*ring data, so that vided services vs,count service dis. cion, which will have 205 houst
there will shop and ito to school to Y
when the t tae comes.everybody can tricts, when it's all built. And Mountat
Tigard,We tool the Bull Mountain
a make better decisions." Froud*said the citizens' group Gate is only one of Ave major subd
nils part of the lari¢er Tigard com• The Str coot of Dreams show,and had not takon an otrictal stance on visions planned.
Amit may someday be a part of the surrounding subdivisions, the question of annexation by "It's like this is just the first wet
an enlarged Tigard city, though which aro in various stages of plan. Tits or any other city, of it whole flood of developments."
Rd w nlnqq, are in unincorporated k1**roudo said she was uncertain
>i►ul! s�. 1- sin.waingtlr.a_g u y Wsrhing�tton County.County rest. what effect the Stroet of Dreams
u phase one art, dente wino live outside cities will would have on the popple living an
straft" vote this fall on whether to forth dull Mountain,though there was no
"We're not interested in forcing three service districts to provide
any annexadons,"he acid.1 do feel urban services.—one to provide
that the area eventually will be police protection,one for lead Mon-
within the city,but that's a long way tenance in urban unincorporated
am" areas and one for road maintenance
The Bull Mountiin•Walnut area In rural Mae.
study will assess the immediate and homeowners on null Mountain
longterm urban s min needs of the will have an opportunity to learn
area.which includes the new devel• more about the proposed county
opments on Bull Mountain and an service districts at a meeting at 7:30
area west of Tigard between Walnut p.m.Aug.19In the pariland General
t bud and Bull Mountain Road,The Electric Co.offlcea, 14=S.w.old
study will look at how much it Schotts Ferry Road, Beaverton.
would coot the city to provide road, County representatives will greet
sewer and police protection to the with residents to explain the dis•
area.which is adjacent to the city on tricts and their costs.
the west, The meeting was arranged by r
Staiied in June,the study has a local citizen participation organim }
target completion date of next tions.Beverly Froude,leader of the
spring,Brian said, citizens' group on Bull Mountain,
Asked If the city were Interested said getting people to attend the
-1 nnexing the new subdivisions on forum was a priority of the group,
t mountaln,Brian replied:"That's "I'm gird that Tigard is doing the
a delicate question. study."she said, "Well at lead.be, j
"We have no'mmediate plans, able to compare apples and apples, , r
but because tht ..sue is coming,we well be talking about facts rather
felt it would be prudent to determine than opinions,"when making decl-
what our position will be,"he said. Bions about annexation and city-pro.
( 48
A �• �jjQQ y�. p W
4 _j S 4G N 3�
6
$5 � --
six
46.0
o �qo :
jq
All6 c�• a o,p
lit
�Vr,a �
i
50
JA
b1 311
g � t '1
a � 3
p MZ7 Hsi cb
HH 1 o i.i a
= u
INK
a 'A
It 4
o�d► 1 I
��M M
Y p
olio],
ch
cmufill
0 Jim& JA
U.. sat
4 v11�!ppiI ifill
CL Alai
W11 ��MIS
C
� g
� l
JS
KKA
mi
amp Id 1111121 gillAl A
s is
U) 4-411111; 1
U �
=C
.0 1,LU
` mmov 0) a) E
a o Eel p
-A 49
1Uaup 11�jlnc« _ -Inc,
F. �• >".({:{Ill r
5 S
>Yaul�t,Ful llainit�winc
Ilumc« �Iw;
r
1 a
1k it+�hf r ,f
IANt't111i lIt Nl 3•' F.tK at
4y7fQ13'nw► - '
'�I:1NlufN
{ n �5 ,;t,It)4111 YdNNNII' 1 �
,, • � - 'I1tNiii•11 llk''
' i{N/ptd{r 1r'
AA4T4 11W
1.4
_ kr Y, �1�•�
r r s
� 17lIN tl�{t.tN
1 i i
.►Iljily�.;..1 ;
t'r.
t
t
ra.
M
.•' ,. y i�.Crt fl ./i�� { 1. ''r fi ♦�. u'1 •• 'Is `'lY 3
y .e
1. f•�f .w. -1'...rJfl�:7r .����}h.. ��.'�t l �'�' • �-
n
t}'�t a ri t � 1 t f . f.S r f ♦ , t i. e
t. .rte,�� t i`7 L y it � � �'M��T •yi��s5�''. L• ..n: 3.',,..r"rY.f/�+" + r
fl'-
5/86
WASHINGION COUNTY - TIGARD
URBAN PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 04"' day of 19�
by WASHINGTON COUNTY, a political s ivjsjon of the State of Oregon,
hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY," and the CITY OF TIGARD, an incorporated
municipality of the State of Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY."
WHEREAS, ORS 190.010 provides that units of local governments may enter into
agreements for the performance of any or all functions and activities that a
party to the agreement, Its officers or agents, have authority to perform; and
WHEREAS, Statewide Planning Goal #2 (Land Use Planning) requires that City,
County, State and Federal agency and special district plans and actions shall be
consistent with the comprehensive ,plans of the cities and counties and regional
plans adopted under ORS Chapter 197; and
WHEREAS, the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission requires each
jurisdiction requesting acknowledgement of compliance to submit an agreement
Setting forth the weans by which comprehensive planning coordination within the
Regional Urban Growth Boundary will be implemented; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY, to ensure coordinated and consistent compre-
hensive plans, consider it mutually advantageous to establish:
1. A site-specific Urban Planning Area within the Regional Urban Growth
Boundary within which both the COUNTY and the CITY maintain an interest
in comprehensive planning;
2. A process for coordinating comprehensive planning and development in
the Urban Planning Area;
3. Policies regarding comprehensive planning and development in the Urban
Planning Area; and
4. A process to amend the Urban Planning Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNTY AND THE CITY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. Location of the urban Planning Area
The Urban Planning Area mutually defined by the COUNTY and the CITY
includes the area designated on Exhibit "A" to this agreement.
II. Coordination of Comprehensive Planning and Development
A. Amendments to or Adoption of a Comprehensive Plan or Implementing
Regulation
s
53
tf
i
Page 2
t
r
1. Definitions
Comprehensive Plan as defined by OAR 660-18-010(5) means a
generalized, coordinated land use map and policy statement of
the governing body of a local government that interrelates all
functional and natural systems and activities relating to the
use of lands, including, but not limited to, sewer and water t
systems, transportation systems, educational facilities, recrea-
tional facilities, and natural resources and air and water
quality management programs. "Comprehensive Plan" amendments do
not include small tract comprehensive plan map changes.
im .lementin Re�ul_ation means any local government zoning ordi-
nance, an v s on ordinance adopted under ORS 92.044 or 92.046
or similar general ordinance establishing standards for imple-
menting a comprehensive plan. "Implementing regulation" does not
include small tract zoning map amendments, conditional use per-
mits, individual subdivision, partitioning or planned unit devel-
opment approval or denials, annexations, variances, building
-permits and similar administrative-type decisions.
2. The COUNTY shall provide the CITY with the appropriate oppor-
tunity to participate, review and comment on proposed amendments
to or adoption of the COUNTY comprehensive pian or implementing
regulations. The CITY shall provide the COUNTY with the
appropriate opportunity to participate, review and comment on !
proposed amendments to or adoption of the CITY comprehensive plan
or implementing regulations. The following procedures shall be
followed by the COUNTY and the CITY to notify and involve one
another in the process to amend or adopt a comprehensive plan or
implementing regulation:
a. The CITY or the COUNTY, whichever has jurisdiction over the
proposal, hereinafter the originating agency, shall notify
the other agency, hereinafter the responding agency, of the
proposed action at the time such planning efforts are ini-
tiated, but in no case less than 45 days prior to the final
hearing on adoption. The specific method and level of
involvement shall be finalized by "Memorandums of Under-
standing" negotiated and signed by the planning directors of
the CITY and the COUNTY. The "Memorandums of Understanding"
shall clearly outline the process by which the responding
agency shall participate in the adoption process. If, at
the time of being notified of a proposed action, the
responding agency determines it does not need to participate
in the adoption process, it may waive the requirement to
negotiate and sign a "Memorandum of Understanding."
b. The originating agency shall transmit draft recommendations
on any proposed actions to the responding agency for its
review and comment before finalizing. Unless otherwise
agreed to in a "Memorandum of Understanding," the responding
54
f
f
. f t
Page 3
agency shall have ten (10) days after receipt of a draft to
submit comments orally or in writing. Lack of response s
shall be considered "no objection" to the draft.
c. The originating agency shall respond to the comments made by
the responding agency either by a) revising the final recom-
mendations,
ecom-
mendations, or b) by letter to the responding agency
explaining why the comments cannot be addressed in the final
draft.
d. Comments from the responding agency shall be given con-
sideration as a part of the public record on the proposed
action. if after such consideration, the originating agency
acts contrary to the position of the responding agency, the
responding agency may seek appeal of the action through the
appropriate appeals body and procedures.
e. Upon final adoption of the proposed action by the origi-
nating agency, it shall transmit the adopting ordinance to
the responding agency as soon as publicly available, or if
not adopted by ordinance, whatever other written documen-
TM tation is available to properly inform the responding agency
of the final actions taken.
B. Development Actions Requiring Individual Notice to Property Owners
1. Definition
Development Action Re uirin Notice means an action by a local
governmen Which requires no y ng by mail the owners of pro-
perty which could potentially be affected (usually specified as a
distance measured in feet) by a proposed development action which
directly affects and is applied to a specific parcel or parcels.
Such development actions may include, but not be limited to small
tract zoning or comprehensivepian map amendments, conditional or
special use permits, individual subdivisions, partltionings or
planned requiring athearings mprocess awhich eis similars,, and other
quasi-judicial in nature.
2. The COUNTY will provide the CITY with the opportunity to review
and torment on proposed development actions requiring notice
within the designated Urban Planning Area. The CITY will provide
the COUNTY with the opportunity to review and comment on proposed
may haveean affectment s onrequiring
unincorporated portionsnotice within hofCITY limits t
the designated
Urban Planning Area.
3. The following procedures shall be followed by the COUNTY and the
CITY to notify one another of proposed development actions:
a. The CITY or the COUNTY, whichever has jurisdiction over the
proposal , hereinafter the originating agency, shall send by
55
Page 4
first class mail a copy of the public hearing notice which
identifies the proposed development action to the other
agency, hereinafter the responding agency, at the earliest
opportunity, but no less than ten (10) days prior to the
date of the scheduled public hearing. The failure of the
responding agency to receive a notice shall not invalidate
an action if a good faith attempt was made by the
originating agency to notify the responding agency.
b. The agency receiving the notice may respond at its discre-
tion. Comments may be submitted in written form or an oral
response may be made at the public hearing. Lack of written
or oral response shall be considered "no objection" to the
proposal .
c. If received in a timely manner, the originating agency shall
include or attach the comments to the written staff report
and respond to any concerns addressed by the responding
agency in such report or orally at the hearing.
d. Comments from the responding agency shall be given con-
sideration as a part of the public record on the proposed
action. If, after such consideration, the originating
agency acts contrary to the position of the responding
agency, the responding agency may seek appeal of the action►
through the appropriate appeals body and procedures.
C. Additional Coordination Requirements
1. The CITY and the COUNTY shall do the following to notify one
another of proposed actions which may affect the community, but
are not subject to the notification and participation require-
ments contained in subsections A and B above.
a. The CITY or the COUNTY, whichever has jurisdiction over the
proposed actions, hereinafter the originating agency, shall
send by first class mail a copy of all public hearing agen-
das which contain the proposed actions to the other agency,
hereinafter the responding agency, at the earliest oppor-
tunity, but no less than three (3) days prior to the date of
the scheduled public hearing. The failure of the responding
agency to receive an agenda shall not invalidate an action
if a good faith attempt was made by the originating agency
. to notify the responding agency.
b. The agency receiving the public hearing agenda may respond
at its discretion. Comments may be submitted in written
form or an oral response may be made at the public hearing.
Lack of written or oral response shall be considered "no
objection" to the proposal .
4 1
56
s
i
I
• Page 5
i
T
r
c. Comments from the responding agency shall be given con- `
sideration as a part of the public record on the proposed
action. If, after such consideration, the originating
agency acts contrary to the position of the responding
agency, the responding agency may seek appeal of the action
through the appropriate appeals body and procedures.
III. Comprehensive Planning and Develo Ment Policies
A. Active Planning Area
f
1. Definition
Active Planning Area means the incorporated area and certain unin
corporate ad Teas contiguous to the incorporated area for which the
CITY conducts comprehensive planning and seeks to regulate
development activities to the greatest extent possible. The CITY
Active Planning Area is designated as Area A on Exhibit "A".
Z. The CITY shall be responsible for comprehensive planning within
the Active Planning Area.
3. The CITY is responsible for the ~preparation, adoption and amend-
ment of the public facility plan required by OAR 660-11 within
the Active Planning Area.
4. The COUNTY shall not approve land divisions within the Active
Planning Area which would create lots less than 10 acres in size,
unless public sewer and water service are available to the
property.
S. The COUNTY shall not approve a development in the Active Planning
.Area if the proposal would not provide for, nor be conditionod to
provide for, an enforceable plan for redevelopment to urban
densities consistent with CITY's Comprehensive Plan in the future
upon annexation to the CITY as indicated by the CITY Comprehensive
Plan.
6. Approval of the development actions in the Active Planning Area
shall be contingent upon provision of adequate urban services
including sewer, water, storm drainage, streets, and police and
fire protection.
7. The COUNTY shall not oppose annexation to the CITY within the
CITY's Active Planning Area.
s
57
Page 6
i
B. Area of Interest
1.
Definition
Area of Interest or Primary Area of Interest means unincorporated
lands contiguous to the Active Planning Area in which the CITY
does not conduct comprehensive planning but in which the CITY does
maintain an interest in comprehensive planning and development
actions by the COUNTY because of potential impacts on the CITY
Active Planning Area. The CITY Area of Interest within the Urban
Planning Area is designated as Area B on Exhibit "A".
2. The COUNTY shall be responsible for comprehensive planning and
development actions within the Area of Interest.
3. The COUNTY is responsible for the preparation, adoption and amend-
ment of the public facility plan required by OAR 660-11 within the
Area of Interest.
4. The CITY may consider requests for annexations in the Area of
Interest subject to the following:
a. The CITY shall not require annexation of lands in the Area of
Interest as a condition to the provision of urban services for
development.
b. Annexations by the CITY within the Area of Interest shall not
create islands unless the CITY declares its intent to complete
the island annexation.
c. The CITY agrees in principle to a plebiscite or other repre-
sentative means for annexation in the Metzger/Progress
Community Planning Area, which includes Washington Square,
within the CITY Area of Interest. Not contrary to the fore-
going, the CITY reserves all of its rights to annex and
acknowledges the rights of individual property owners to annex
to the CITY pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes.
d. Upon annexation of land within the Area of Interest to the
CITY, the CITY agrees to convert COUNTY plan designations to
CITY plan designations which most closely approximate the
density, use provisions and standards of COUNTY designations.
Furthermore, the CITY agrees to maintain this designation for
one year after the effective date of annexation unless both
the CITY and COUNTY Planning Directors agree at the time of
annexation that the COUNTY designation is outdated and an
amendment may be initiated before the one year period is
over.
58
f
Page 7
5. The City of Beaverton and the City of Tigard have reached an
agreement on a South Beaverton-North Tigard boundary establishing
future annexation areas of interest. This boundary coincides with
the northern Urban Planning Area boundary shown on Exhibit "A".
Washington County recognizes that the future annexation area of
interest boundary line may change in the future upon mutual
agreement of both cities.
C. Special Policies
1. The CITY and the COUNTY shall provide information of comprehensive
planning and development actions to their respective recognized
Community Planning Organizations (CPO) through the notice proce�
dures outlined in Section III of this Agreement.
2. At least one copy of any COUNTY ordinance which proposes to (1)
amend the COUNTY comprehensive plan, (2) adopt a new plan, or (3)
amend the text of the COUNTY development code shall be mailed to
4 the CITY within five (5) days after its introduction.
3. At least one copy of any COUNTY ordinance which proposes to rezone
land within one (1) mile of the corporate limits of the CITY shall
be mailed to the CITY within five (5) days after its introduction.
,. 4. The City of Tigard, City of Beaverton and Washington County have
agreed to the following stipulations regarding the connection of
Murray Boulevard from Old Scholls Ferry Road to the intersection
of SW 121st Avenue and Gaarde Street:
a. The City of Tigard, City of Beaverton and Washington County
agree to amend their respective comprehensive plans to reflect
the following functional classification and design
considerations:
1. Designation: Collector
2. Number of Travel Lanes: 2 (plus turn lanes at major
intersections)
3. Bike Lanes: Yes
4. Right-of-Way: 60 feet (plus slope easements where
necessary)
S. Pavement Width: 40 foot minimum
1
59
Page 8
6. Access: Limited
7. Design Speed: 35 M.P.H.
8. Minimum Turning Radius: 350 to 500 feet
9. Parkii,g Facilities: None provided on street
t
10. Upon verification of need by traffic analysis, the connec-
tion may be planned to eventually accommodate additional !
lanes at the Murray/Old Schotls Ferry and Murray/New
Schotls Ferry intersections.
11. The intersection of SW 135th Avenue and the Murray
Boulevard connection will be designed with Murray
Boulevard as a through street with 135th Avenue
terminating at the Murray connection with a "T"
intersection.
12. The general alignment of the Murray Boulevard connection
is illustrated in Exhibit B.
b. Any changes to land use designations in the Murray Boulevard
connection area shall be coordinated with all jurisdictions to
assure that traffic impacts are adequately analyzed.
c. The City of Tigard, City of Beaverton and Washington County ,
shall support improvements to the regional transportation
system as outlined in the adopted Regional Transportation
Plan (RTP).
d. Improvements to SW Gaarde Street between SW 121st Avenue and
Pacific Highway 99W should occur coincident with the connection
of Murray Boulevard from Walnut/136th Avenue to Gaarde Street.
e. The City of Tigard and Washington County, with involvement by
,affected property owners, shall jointly develop an alignment
for the connection of Murray Boulevard between the 135th
Avenue/Walnut Street and 121st Avenue/Gaarde Street intersec-
tions in 1986.
5. The CITY and the COUNTY shall informally establish administrative
procedures and designate appropriate personnel to receive and
review notices required by Sections II A, B and C of this
Agreement.
60
L
t
i
Page 9
IV. Amendments to the Urban Planning Area Agreement
A. The following procedures shall be followed by the CITY and the COUNTY
to amend the language of this agreement or the Urban Planning Area
Boundary:
1. The CITY or COUNTY, whichever jurisdiction originates the
proposal , shall submit a formal request for amendment to the
responding agency.
2. The formal request shall contain the following:
a. A statement describing the amendment.
b. A statement of findings indicating why the proposed amendment
is necessary.
c. If the request is to amend the planning area boundary, a map
which clearly indicates the proposed change and surrounding
area.
3. Upon receipt of a request for amendment from the originating
agency, the responding agency shall schedule a review of the
request before the appropriate reviewing body, with said review �.
to be held within 45 days of the date the request is received.
4. The CITY and the COUNTY shall make good faith efforts to resolve
requests to amend this agreement. Upon completion of the review,
the reviewing body may approve the request, deny the request, or
make a determination that the proposed amendment warrants
additional review. If it is determined that additional review is
necessary, the following procedures shall be followed by the CITY
and COUNTY:
a. If inconsistencies noted by both parties cannot be resolved
in the review process as outlined in Section Ili (3), the
CITY and the COUNTY may agree to initiate a joint study.
Such a study shall commence within 90 days of the date
it is determined that a proposed amendment creates an
inconsistency, and shall be completed within 90 days of said
date. Methodolo43ts and procedures regulating the conduct
of the joint study shall be mutually agreed upon by the CITY
and the COUNTY prior to commencing the study.
b. Upon completion of the joint study, the study and the
recommendations drawn from it shall be included within the
record of the review. The agency considering the proposed
amendment shall give careful consideration to the study
prior to making a final decision.
61
Page In
B. Prior to August 30, 1986 the parties will mutually study the following
topics:
Urban services provision by the County and City; the possibility
of Tigard ass using active plan responsibility for a portion of the
Metzger-Progress Planning Areqa as shown as an area of interest on
Exhibit A; and the possible removal of a portion of Section III
B.4.d., which now requires the City to maintain County plan
designations for one year after the effective date of annexation.
Proposed revisions to this agreement shall be considered by the
parties as data is available as soon as possible after
September 1, 1986.
C. The parties will jointly review this Agreement every two (2) years, or
more frequently if mutually needed, to evaluate the effectiveness of
the processes set forth herein and to make any necessary amendments.
The review process shall commence two (2) years from the date of
execution and shall be completed within 60 days. Both parties shall
make a good faith effort to resolve any inconsistencies that may have
developed since the previous review. If, after completion of the 60
day review period inconsistencies still remain, either party may
terminate this Agreement.
V. This Urban Planning Area Agreement repeals and replaces the Urban P1anaing
�. Area Agreement dated September 26,'1983, Washington County Resolution and
Order No. 84-73, and City of Tigard Resolution 84-19B.
This Agreement commences on
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed thii Urban Planning Area Agreement
on the date set opposite their signatures.
CITY OF TIGARD
By / � ? Date
ayor
oo�
W rl'i"OINGTON COUNTY
By Date
Y
Mairman; Goard or County commissioners
Date ---
Recording Secretary
62
•Y.^r
y, R
Mql
/ is L�`t►���Y I• _r�. _ ��,
��r r
71
NA
1.
\• ll I
I�
I.
i
` , / � �•..� I i�[,,,a i 1. '� t � _
°iia f,
rte. ,� • � �I` NI••MM+M F' :• �[�-��.1 �.1 ';? ',����J- �. 4
i •, n �� .;.. :`til •,` �� ; ,�.
�►
yI 4.
� 1 A •
;f � • f
I
i'
v
*4.•y 1�'�t 1 1,.1 t
'tY
.. ).. � c s T � ..i t Ir �a c r -.. �: _� M u,f � r !� };`" 1 `t•.,P�1 /' , y (...; �' `,,, r...�.� �:.' vt �. ��
MURRAY BLVD. CONNECTION
GENERAL AUGNMEM'
rrr B
y�. 600 less
602 W6MFLANWG AREA art•
601
004 Sol 107
600 301
5
los
00
108
101
1100 100
200
1101
• K
1301
1200
1302 ,
1300 �r
100
201 ,
101 '
200 r
MURRAY BLVD. CONNECTION
f,
L
f�
... ^++—r.ter.--ter..�.J!� . •r a::''�tgL`-'•v.�''�
• cra or Troia; onaou
AN 0XDIg1t QZ A38'B.AMG ONInance No. 66.41 um j=rac? To
l�tR9?ffi•_,Ol'�BI�i:E3' "9'I'�1C���ittf�..flO��Q�.�lRll�ta a�fi•iLWlri�4tft�r . .
1 Tlae;QAtjjr' l�oic sil >t is r►tt1Aat. e�►aa. Qitr,it 21cS 4 i0d au
f a' at t' t!► iia 9�.ba �ilTo�'iR Eiiaea'S.ttaQr�d�'ate4t tat* "a
atg�t-tAko'#b�i'esrii�tb' ,, a� Ai�lt��Y'i��"�teab�ta6Eao Coaagy, orsdort
�t191i't*splanoard f.R�•�► 3bl/did}8�a�'a7r01�111�wtlCd ��4�1��tt4d�DRq=,{��x��
IIes�io �t ,'I�roe4�. d�;66eAAAaate�twd bT the cooxell on tba
A�Rb
44W.0 mil►oorp 19460 *Ad all a"nalwatta thentol
boy and the
,Iaamwdb Wilt' is' possar ►' badtth 4�4'
11"my•it tut= e•dr the•alty, or TlgiR that ar ate .
oamat tto. 66.4; 6" •alis 11u d�Dtt6�b'tllstvete, haring, baeq soporsoded
by tlaa'omfis�aaesa,�gard+rra baa 6" tr*Smutaaas or the +p,.v1nz0 r
m. ddd Agd6T:.o�•1t11 '41r��ib�t �,ti Q�CWdQ�Ef, 'bi tta�Eaa�ed,Ott► $be
laask �oe+itpttri« �Aii' r tS"r m%4W„As,aer*by •6se14"4 to "int and ,
thia dridiou►a stay lrr*4%lv*,4trvaal•its ¢asbatt•by *be c"aetl rid
PAdd1Dr my VA44taws" To* ek all 00=611 M&Absxt po"Ont o oft4tr
. tei�, r�sAt�1"tt,�e.;.t� btari'ber arwt ii11�,N only, .
.A4i+�1�11tA•.day ot•d�aptoabari 11TV,ram
.
r '
Atl°•• iAY Di by, 40 *f.8*Vteab*r,19j?.
mwoogaiIf-.*
ORDINANCE
65
AGREEMENT (TIGARD)
THI$ AGits.e;dENT ,wade and entered ante as of the ' ~' day of
19?0, between the CI OF TIGARD, a s3un c. cal cck.�-
poraLion of the State of Oregon, hereira&ar 11eferred to m4 "City".,
f and the UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASRI:iQi�ON COUNTY, s municipal cox--
1 paration azid county service district, hereinafter referred to As the
• "A"..ncy
WHEREAS, the Agency was duly Formad ane or3.vaced to de, Cbag:er
451 ORS for the purpose Of providing newaraSe treatment facilities
within Stu boundaries; and
WHEREAS, City is within the Agency by action of its Counuii,? :ma
pursuant to an election duly conducted within the boundarise of
Agency; and
WHEREAS, City has and does; own and oparato'certala new*;*
facilitioa within the Agency; and
WHEREAS, Agency has developed a mastar plan for, the inspla«tRntet-
tion of sewarage facilities within the Agency and iv in a position to
coordinate and unify treatment raclUtlos into an Integrated-ze3:varag*
system for the areas within the Agency; and
W #EREAS, City and Agency have the authority to anter Into long-
range contracts for the cooperative operation of service'fac.tlii:ias
under ORS 451.540 and Chapter 190 ORS; and
WHEREAS, it would be in the best interest of the Agency and City
• to enter into art agreement which provides for the operation and•ownpr-
ship of ctrtAin sewerage facilities and other pertinent mattors rolatluV
thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of th+s
covenants and agreements to be kept and performed by the paartiox hareytO,
it ,is eovtnante:d and agreed as follows:
Section . Definition of Termx.
A. Wherovei the following terms aro-used in this agroometnt,
they shall have the following mania unless otherwise
specifically indicated by the context in which thiy appb rt
I. " .ONttECTrON CHARGE" rBAan8 an amount of money charged
for connecting to the sanitary ssexer oysters.
2. ''FINANCING REPORT" means Pi.nancin Flan Unified
Severe a Agency, Warthin taifre&on, ds 'ad
• o ruary, ,, by Bartle walle A030CM03.
3. "INDUSTRIAL WASTES" means any liquid, gaaoouu, radio-
active.or no1Sd waste substance or a combination
thearesof resulting from any process of industrial or
manufacturing bus mess, or from the deveeloptsent or
recovery of natural rosou_rcos.
• 4. "OPERATION AND MAINTENANCV1 means the ragular perfona-
onee of work regt:irdd eto assures continued function iny,'
66
Ib
t
i
7
t
a
of the sanitary seweraa ayatem and corrective
measures taken to repair facilities to.keep theta
In operating condition.
"ORDERu mai= Resolutions, Orders and Directives of
the Agency prescribing standards and conditions of
uaa of sanitary sewerage f1Cilitie3 and rates and
charges therafor.
• 6. "PERMIT APP LICATXON AND INSPECTION FEE', means fees
charged an applicant for permits and relatcd
inspections for connections to the sanitary !
sewerage system.
T. "PERSON" maana the state, any individual, public or
private corporation,-polltIcal subdivision, govern-
mental agency, =n1c1pality, industry, copartna.ship, t
aussociatIon, firm, trust, estate or any other IpAul i
• entity whatsoov*r.
a. "SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM" means any combination of
s*wag* treatment plant, pumping, or lift fat,ciliti*zt,
sever pip*, force mains, laterals, manholes, aide a
sewers, laboratory facilities and equipment, and !
any other facilities for the collection, conveyance, r
treatment and diapogal of sanitary sewage cororising
the total publicy-owned sanitary sewbrage,syatem
within Agency' jurisdiction, to which storm, murt'aca►
and ground waters are not intentionally acWttod.
9. "SEW'Eii SERVICE CHARGE" moans a regular chdrg* to a
property owner or occupant sof designated promises for }
( the use of the sanitary sewerage. syst*m.
10. "SPUCIAL AUDIT" moans a financial review or the actual
costs, federal grants, sewer bonded indsbtednsas,
and 'other pertinent data relating to a determination
of the amount payable to the City for the acquisition
by tho Agency of designated properties as descrlUod
In this agreement.
11. "SiARDARDS" means that standards and conditions of use
of the sanitary sewerage ,ayntem as specified by the
Agency.
3actiorf 2. 02Crat insc�ures rtnd Relationshli�u.
.4. The City agrees to:
1. Enforce the standards, rules and regulations govern-
".t,z; the use of tho sanitary sewerage system as pro-
toulgated by the Agency, and to notify Aganey or
violations requiring Agency legal action.
2. Obtain Agency review and approval of any perish
application for induatria.l waste diaeharge.
3. Obtain Agency review and approval of plane and speci-
fications for any addition, modification or recon-
struction (other than repairs) of the publicy-owned
sanitary sewerage ayatem, prior to undertaking work
thereon.
.
ra:,o
2 '
67
j
4. Obtain Agency raviaw and approval prior to enter_-
ing into any agreement for the: use of the sanitary
sewerage system.
Initir` 5. Obtain Agency review and approval prior to
at-ing or entering into any agreement -for the firancing
or incurrirtg of Indebtedaneas relating to the sani-
tary sewerage system.
6. Establish in its records a (separate accounw Sar the
purpose of accounting Sar connection and user fai:i
collected by the City pursuant to this atgreament.
7. Use City revenues, exclt:sive of paymernta racaivdd
pursuant to Section 5 hereof, JUriaing from this
agreement for sewerago-rolated purpoaua only,
8, Allow the Agency aceeas at any reasonable tier.-
upon reasonable notice to inspect and test aevar'a;ga
facilities within the City. ,
$. Crant then Agency permits from time to time as may bo
necessary for the installation of sawa>;aga facilitie3
in the public stroots and ways of the City without
•impoaing permit issuaned fees, provided that the '
Agency &hall adhera.to any conditlons,requirod pur—
suant to §451.550(7) ORS. ,
10. Take such curative or remedial action -az and when
necessary to maintain that portion of the publicly-
owned sanitary sewerage esysteam under the juria4ietion '
of the City in accordance with prodarlbed Agency
standards, subject, however, to budgetai7 limitations
and to the extant that the City may be lawfully
authorlmed to act:
Saction•, . 'awnsrahi12 of Facilities.
A. The City doss hereby transfox, assign and not over to the
Aoney all of the City's ownership Interests in and to
certain sewage treatment and collection facilities within
the City, including
1, Treatment plants and appurtnnar►cas:
2. 3twage collecting trunk and,intorceptor linos of
24-inch or greater diameter.
3. Equipment and supplies an not forth on the attached
Exhibit "All by reference made a part hereof.
4. 1Eavoments, rights-of-way and permits paid by tha
City with respect to the foregoing "1" and "2" but
subject to the terms and provisions thereof, to all
of which the Agency &haul bo bound and conform and
shall save, hold han.rmloi s and indemnify thst City
from any failure to conform thereto.
D. The City horaby excepts and reserves to itceelf all land
.or Anterout in land, except as hcrelAaabove! stated,
Yager 3
68
including lands utilized in connection with treatment
plant:., treatment facilities; provided, however, that
the City doea hereby grant to the Agency consent for
CT the non-exclusive use of such lands as may be necoa3n-y
to enable the Agency to own, operate and maintain such
:facilities during continuance of this agreement. '
C. In consideration of the obligations of theCity under
this stetion, the Agency shall compensate the City in
accordance with Section 5 of this agreemant.
Section A. Administration Q eration rind Maintenance of
neweraRe
A. City and Agency agree that:
1. City will continua to operaete and anaintain the
treatment plant and other facilities until tho use
of the facilition ,are, in the discretion of the
Agency, no longer required. '
2. City will proceos permit applications, make inspoc-
tions of connections to the sanitary coverage:
r ,,. ,system,. Zollect, ,acgount and record qe>nnoction foaa, .
Inspection fees, and sewer service charges within
the purview of this agrooment, in Accordwice with
the orders of the Agoncy.
N� 3. City will remit to the Agency•on a monthly basin,
with a report of Agency-designated Forms, the fol-
` lotting amounts:
a. forty (40x) par cent of all permit and
inspection fees.
tK
b: Thirty (30x) per cent of all sower service
charges collected.
c. , Clehty (00%) per cant or all connection
charges collected.
4. City will diligently maintain regular billingo and
collection of fees, UdJust complaints thereto, and
pursue delinquency follow-ups and tai:+e ra%asonablo
steps for collection thereof.
r. Agency may at any reasonable time upon reaconabio
notice inspect and audit the books and records of -
the City with respect to matters within the purview
of this agreement.
6. The City seed the Agency may each need extra help from
time to time that might be supplied by the other..
In such a cash, either City or the Agency in u,iliz-
ing the services s of an e:nployoee of tha other, shall ,
pay the landing governmant as follows: the emp3.oyeo+zs
salary rate currently in effect for this time worked
plus twenty-five (2$e) per cent thereof.
' Wage �I
69
Section 5. Comuensation.
It The Agency agrees to compensate the City for the acquisi-
tion of Its sewerage facilities as identifiod In
�.. Iixliiblt "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, the
total amount of .$-.' 536,849.00 , payable in the
manner following:
1. The sum of WON., paid to the City upon execution
of this agreement, the receipt uberoof is he.abi
acknowledged.
2. Pre-existing general obligation sewerage raailiwy
bonds:
As agreesttolpayytontheua the City, orasCitythe Aaaycdi� y
;�ct,
not less than ton (10) days prior to duan date, n'
sum sufficient to enable the City t0 pay principal
and interest on all genearal obligation bonda of
,the City according to the amortization sehodulo of
each issue as and when same fall duo, with respect
to sewor&ege facilities of the Citlr, Including those
set forth in Exhibit "A".
Compensation to the .City From the Agency for pr;in-
elpal sums required for bonded debt service only
shall be applied In reduction of the Warred balsnoo
of Agency's obligations hersundt1r; interest pkymon-a '
'on bonded debts hereunder shall constitute intoroat
due the City on that portion of the deferred balaxaoa
of the Agency's obligations hero ndor represented
by the City's .bonded indebtedness to harein doUnad.
3. The balancer of the Agency's obllgati=3 to the City
Tor transrvr of the ra cili.t:ies hereunder shall bar
paid by the Agency to the C t i annual Install-
mants, each not less than*$A 44.45
Interest on doferrad valance ratio•tea or rL va
(57) per cont per annum from Jtlly1- l2o
until paid, the first payment"fo"" o made on or-- ra
July ,1, 1972'and a like pakyment on or before July 1
of each calendar yaar thaaraaartor.
Section 6. Other Provisions.
A. The City and the Agency further agree that:
1. The Agency will not extend services to areas outnide
the City and outside existing sanitary diatrictx
except with the prior approval of the City wherry
use of City facilities lex neceseary to carves such
area, or whare•aurh &roan are contiguous to or In the
near vicinity of the City's boundaries.
2. The installation and construction, and the financing;
thereof, of reser linen and facilities having a
d1wooter of loss than 24 Inchon aro doemed to be
within this jurisdiction and control of the City,
unle6s otherwise agreed to by the Agency. Such
Page 5
• ACltl;g148,NT
70
installaction and construction shall be made la
accordance with thin agreement. Agency mil not
establish local assessment districts as provid-t4
by Chapter 451 OILS.
3. The ta
City and the Agency will each obtain such insr--
ance, contracts as necessary to cover the liabilities
of the City and the Agency respectively for tha
risks and lists set forth in 130.260 at seq ons,
and each of the parties hereto shall cause the other
to be named as co-insured on the policy of the other
consistent with the obligations of each of the par-
ties under the terms of this contract,
h. At such time as the •Agency shall discontinua opera-
tion or use of my facilitios on City--owned proialues,
the .Agency shall ramove such equipmentfacilitled
or fixtures;therafrom for a period of. six (6) months
after' such discontinuance or such 'faoilitioa tshall.
become City property* provided that to the extant
the Agency shall demolish or remove facilititss,
the sites thereof shall be loft free and clear of
all residue and debris and in good order and condition.
•
This agreement shall be effective upon its execution by both '
parties horoto and shall continueineffect for a teim of thirty (30)
years (rota and after the date hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has boon executed in dupli-
cato pursuant to resolution* heretofore duly and logally adopted by
oath of the parties signatory hereto.
UNXFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
ZPP19Y9 AS TO OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ORE00N
Ca+nq �av,wri !w ay '
Wnbtnjitem County,Oro# fit oar o puny �mm ss onaar
of ashington County, aw th@ governing
body of the Unified Sewerage Agency.
:it�:t:':.: t►it:r'..: CITY OF TIGARD, ORE0014
DATA
�u�cK uv rrsr.Genaw Mayor
ny ..
Iiacor ar
3
a
'AADEHDA
1. page S. Section 5-x121 following the complete paragraph
anding with the words "not forth in E~thibit 'A•", add
"payments will commence on or before July,l, 1972 in
accordance with the amortisation schedule shown in
4xhibit *W.-
2.
W.-
2. Page 5, Suction S-A31 following the end of the paragraah,
add "Such payments to be nada over a period tot to
exceed twenty years."
3. Page 6, Section 6 A-41 the latter section of which
reads. "tha aitea thereof :shall be left free and clour
Of all residue and dabria and In good order and condi-.
tion," to read, "the sites thereof shall be Left frog
and clear of All demolition waste and debris."
tf
xa
72
e
• i
a
's
A-1 Trvatsment Plant and Appurtenant-163 a
(a) Main Lift Station: .-I-wo la S.P. motoxs and puna_=, atructuro,
piping, valvas and cbntrol aquiw.mcsa_.
(b) Control Building: , iilding structure. 2soiler, control r.aial,
flow rucorder, sludge ucuAp, wato:
closet, hot water heatex, s13109 xqs—
cir ulation pump. Piping, v:slva,+ era x i;t+d
items. ,
(c) Grit Channel: structure gator and flow mat4.;ing
equipment:
(d) Primary Digeators Streicture, piping And valves.
(a) Socondary Digesters Structure, pipirjA valvas rind supe-• j
nutant Controls.
(t) Prizaary Clarifiers Structure, valvas, i'+ipis+g, driven
machaniu m, and rotor.
(g) Diversion Structures StructU re, piping and vAlvan.
(h) Secondary Clarifiers Structure, valvef; piping, drive
machaninm and motor.
(i) Activated Sludge Danins Structures, piping, vnlvea, t%m
acra►t ors, and two 10 13.11. aftluunt pet,njja.
(i) Aerobic Di4ostion Basins Structures, piping, vmlj, chlorLw
content burin, and one nrarator.
(k) Chlorine rquipment Dldg.s Structures, Chlorines tiquipanr::t,
hoisting Oquil.-nont, treeatO OlUdoo 1`+nn,'►,
control panel, *Calow and fixod erq•aipgftt.
(l) !recirculation Rump Stations Two 7N it.P. mubrnaraibls rsci.-
culation pumps and reatatod control o�j►ip-
sneent.
(m) hitter Pomp Stations 7%m 7h td.P. purpa and mtora, artruatnz-#,
piping, valves, control oquipmont, sump
pump, and wawhdown ixunp.
(n) !rock lilterds Two rock fiitors, atructurvi, pipiul se ek,
valves, and diutribution nyatsrm.
73
W final clarifier: •33-P0 clurific+r st_uc:turt 3-
driva mchani.uma and r.+otora.
(p) Old Chlarina Contact Tans: Structure only.
:•. (q) Yard pipinq & I iscellaneous.- AL underground utilitina
between 3tructura or related utilities,
diversion boxes, stand pipe, vasta burau=,
• conducts, val e3. rmrhalas and mtorinV
equil=ant.
A-2 Sow-.%r nines 24" or greater
(a) Zak" Interceptor (City of Tigard)
A-3 F-,Ap StAtion3 ,
(ai) Durnham Street Pump Station (City)
(b) ronit;% Street Pump Statiotl (City)
Page 2 - fthibit "A"
t
74
l ;iLINO ENT TO CONT:iaCT
::tituaan the City of TSSard and tho Ga fled Zzw6%riga
of `aa:3'hington County s Qr ,,ron
d
Dut_ zzpt;�� er 0, 1970
IT Vt AGRI;-M botwt*e_1 the CITY 0'r TItIARD aml i he Will}.Y.i..D.
i
:13WeV% 'Aft. cy OF NHS:i?'NG'= COUNTY, 0n-0014 whnt In aOita iA-srgtlon
ct Vhz4 :wv;ual b,;neMta to Ire attnined hixrvund_r, I';;aMra�1 o:' '
',t'GCLc�1 + of ,131d nantr;wt be, mid the name In Hereby, wneridxd to
1
03. Tho GLty 0441 thu :sonoy will mtch 61MUn avoli
4.n;su,•.uia4 aontracta. a%3 s�aaoioury to cov*r their
ra3poctiv3 liabilitlQ* ar131114 out of thin
*3.vnmtnt gnd each of the NartAca herato ahrAll
pravld4 writtan ovl4enco or such Insurance i'or
11olto o. liability not lanz than those act
tbrth In OR3 30,270, Such inourance contrActo
ah&ll provide far at loazt 30 dsys wrlttan
notlao to bu glvani thv otllsr party In tiro overt
at a1a.�callAtic�n."
Xrr all otlmr r44pocta o uld "rament boarina 4Nto vC 3ort M-
bvr D; 191C hn, 4.id tho umo 14 horaby, rAt flAd and aonfir:aod.
i'1 NXT.4R..11 '1,111 E47+, 101125 inatrumvitt has bawk v;pouted In
iMiplica lit purewAnt to reacrlutl,ons bvroto:or+a duly And I*UNI%y
h4optvd A7 »,3ah of tits pnrtiva algnator►y heri4o.
VNIMED SAWL�Jli= 1+UNCY
OP ytN;jJO1Wf ,VCIUTt:C1'O b:tNON
�,y,;.W Nw.•,.1 ,�a :fl ?�::.,,,, ,, C
��x:.4an,'Ysu1s:�"o L��unny }:w:a��T%�zsm.•:�
00 VO4! %1xt&" county, a3 Liss covArntp
body of thu V.-Ar od :;osier.*.r,4 Apwntsy
r�C111 G" TIGA1,41)`
1b y
C ' r.
75
I
AGREEMENT txCA R`•0 72-9
TRIS AGM?..: ,=::, ;,a.:: anJ �n..:r_•.: i::co cil:.: 1:-� 3ay
ot
^` �•• . L~ t>=
czu.nty, a ORS Chapter vSl :Ctt�l�l.:�i:it1yC
Service
V.
i.e=3=rict az a;
.1 thO City oL
Tigard,
:1 ;�.:ricipsl corporation 43_ ch..- sca_•: o! Oregon, hereinafter r::f*rred to
AS "City",
r' ..,.ic: ,�u••.:ua:2c to thL �;:s :<<•raa:: city and Agoncy, dated
alA#s� S, 1970, City does op%�ratt~.:r,:=w aincain t�a treatment plant and
other facilities for ;eaar;ige tr%,at^Lnt -;lie .-e city limits of City;
WHEREAS, City i4 desirous of Ngvr,;:y :.2:4% opi:ration and
maintenance responsibility of t::e a",.:ur49,; �rL.l:r-•:1; plant «�licn formerly
belonged to City; ,and
WHERMS it would ba in the :asst ;n%crua, o: .1g•zilcy a,- City to
agree to Agency assuming the oparat: on and r•+ainter4-2r.e- roe ponaibility of
said sewerage treatment plant, with the al•,..;opxiatw c;han v of revernue
distribution by City;
NOW,TIIEREFORE, in consideration of the pre-;:iU%NJ X!." ;,C L11* cov4nants
+end tgreamentsto be kept and performed by the partial ;;crate, :t i3
covenanted and agreed as follows;
1. Secti4 1. of that contract betwaeen City Ann :ljon4y,
dated��� 0, 1970, concerning purchase of ueworago
facilities by Agency and the distribution of mainttl1arkC.,
and op*rational responsibilities betwoon Agency and City,
be, and hereby is, deleted in its entirety from said
agreement, and the following ,language shall be inaortod
in its places
"Effective February 1, 1972, n.nd thereafter, the tgorlry
shall operate and maintain the treatment plant find
Pump stations. The City shall continue to � erate ana
maintain all other facilWOX of the collection system.
Agency shall operate and maintain the treatment pj,gnt
until, in the sole discretion of the Agency, the us® of
said treatment plant is no longer required."
2. vection 4. A. 2, be of the above describod contract, dat€d
December 0, 1970, be, and hereby is, deleted in its entirety
from said agreement, and that the following language ahall 1m
inserted in its places
"vexventy percent (70X) of All sewer service cheap es
collected." 9
'J. The remainder of said agreement, dated U ctei 0, 1970, ami
each part thereof, be, and hereby in, ratified, re3adoptcod, and
continued in full forces and affect Iyand botwean tho partiou
hereto.
IN WITNE99 WHERUM, this instrument has been eaxecutod in duplicate
pursuant to resolutions heretofore duly and legally adopted by Bach of the
Parties ,signatory hereto.
CITY IGARD, OREGON UNI SEWEIMCS AGENCY
C •� WAS COU27'rY, OREGOJA
Dw DY r:�--- -
May C1� rm ri, Board of County Comm au onern
13ystlington County, Oregon .,
�• As the governinq be-4v of the lln4 fir.A
Re+rnran..
76
il11INIll,
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES FROM
VARIOUS JURISDICTIONS
t
77
TIGARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS,DISTRICT 23J
( ORAdn**Vatlon OtNce
13137 S.W.Pacific Highway
Tigard Oregon 97223
Area Code(503)620.1620
February 19, 1988
Mr. Bob Joan
City Administrator
City of Tigard
P.O. Dox 33397
Tigard, Oregon 97323
Duar Bob;
We have reviewed the "Draft Final" copy of the Dull
Mountain/Walnut Area Urban Services Study and wish to pass
on to you the follcwing commanta or reactions to the
information contained in the study.
As you know, the Tigard School District is experiencing
significant annual increases in student enrollment. It has
long been ra policy of the school district's Board of
' Directors to not oppose development causing those increases
but instead to provide for such growth by having adequate
classroom space and related school facilities available when
needed. You are also wall aware of the potential impact
that full development of the Bull Mountain aroa will likely
have on school onrollm®nts over the next several yesrs.
With that in mind, there are three main comments we have at
this time relative to the study. First, the Bull
Mountain/Walnut Study Area map does not reflect the recent
change in the Urban Growth Boundary which occurred ].ate in
1987. One of the impacts of that change was to bring inside
the UGB an 18-acre site owned by the school district and
located at S.W. 131st and Beef Bond Road. This, along with
the "Institutional" zoning designation which has been
approved for that property, makes it possible for the school
district to plan for an elementary school on that site at
some point in the future. With the anticipated development
in the Pull Mountair. area, this obviously becomes a critical
factor in school di.�,strict plans for providing for increased
enrollments.
,ems( a-098 f L
Secondly, the "Area of Interest" shown on the map of the
Bull Mountain/Walnut Study Area does not include our Beef
Bend school site and, therefore, is apparently not at this
time being considered for annexation into the City of
Tigard. With the change in the Urban Growth Boundary, it
appears to make sense to have the new area included in the
city boundaries of Tigard and we would recommend that option
be pursued.
Finally, enclosed is a copy of a letter we sent to Keith
Liden in June, 1987 regarding an interest we have in seeing
traffic patterns improved between the Bull Mountain area and
Mary Woodward Elementary School. Beginning with the 1988-89
school year, all elementary-cage students living in the area
west of Pacific Highway will be attending Mary Woodward. As
the letter states, any Flans which will result in a more
direct route from Bull Mountain to the school would have a
significant positive impact on our transportation situation
and have the full support of the school district.
Thank you for furnishing us with a copy of the Urban
Services Study and providing us with an opportunity to
comment. If you have questions or need further :information,
please lot me know.
SinceWOOO
l
etc .
.4
R ssell Joki, Superintendent
Enclosure
HOTEs It should be noted that while the Urban Growth Boundary has changed
in the area addressed by the School District, it is outside of the
study area and would not effect this report.'
79
I&Admb9svation
nwmD PURUC SCHOOM DISTRICT 23J
Offke
3137 S.W.Pacific Higtnway
Tigard.Oregon 97323
Area Code 1501620-1620
20-1620
June Q, 1987
Mr. Keith Aiden
City of Tigard
1312n 3-ti. Hull
Tigard. Oregon 97223
Deur Keith:
As a result of the residential devolopment on Bull Mountain
and the Planned expansion of Mary Woodward Elementary School
to accomodate children from that area. we have an interest
sin ystem botweonaBullfforts to Mountain andrS./W.the 121staStrreetation
- Y
it is our understanding that discussions have or aro taking
place regarding the extension of S-W. 121st in a southerly
direction• thus providing a more direct rout* to Bull
Mountain Road. This development, if it were to occur. would
greatly improve school bus transportation patterns.
we wish
to go on record
and aweswould tappreciate ing any chaving scopies tho iof the be
c
plans.
it we can be ved in any
matter. plessendolfuture
not hesitate tolotiusuknowns on this
Sincerely,
Russ Joki, Superintendent
80
T I G A R D WATER DISTRICT 8841 S, W. COW.MERC1AL ST.
TtGARD.OREGON 97223-6290
PHONE (503) 639.1554
February 19, 1988
Robert W. Jean
city Administrator
13125 SW Hail Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 99223
Re: Bull Mountain/Walnut Area Urban Services Study
Dear Bob:
Thank you gor the opportunity to comment on the subject
study. T hava reviewed the study and find that it is very
comprehensive.
Tigard Water District, too, perceives future problems to
adequately serve water to the Buil Mountain area. Encicsaed is
a recent study pertaining to this ;,latter. As a result of the
c1 recommendations contained therein, the water district will,
within the next month, complete the installation of a parallel
16-inch water main between the 10-14G reservoir (at 125th and
Bull Mountain Road) and Hi Tor reservoir on top of Bull Mountain.
Also, additional pumping capacity has been added at the 132nd
Straet pump station. Plans area presently being drafted to
consatruct a n@w 1-MG ron arvoir on district-owned property at
Ili Tor in 1992.
It is my view that no matter which governmental entity
assumes responsibility for this area (bull 14ountain) , there are,
major problems ahead. Particularly, at some point in time, the
vehicular traffic problem must be addreassisaad, and the costs will
be substantial.
Perssonaslly# l likes the more demanding, consistent utility
requirements of the city versus the county when new developments
are planned. This includes curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, etc.
So, good luck on your plan and there is plenty of work ahead
no matter which governmental body assumes responsibility.
Sincerely yours,
XOTRs The original copy of the
referenced "Hater Supply Plan For
Bull Mountain. Area - Tigard e4obent E. antes
Water District - 9/85" is on Administrator
file at the office of the Tigard
City Recorder.
81
P.O.BOX 127•TUALATIN.OREGON 97062 PHONE 682-Ml
o�s
February 22, 1988
Robert W. Jean
City Administrator
City of Tigard
A.O. Dox 23397
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: Dull Mtn./Walnut Area Urban Services Study
Dear Bob,
The draft final of the Dull Mtn. Service Study appears to meet
the needs of the Tualatin Fire District.
We would like to see a statement regarding water supplies that
would require developers to assure a continuance of present Tigard
( Water District practices. Adequate supply lines and hydrants are
important to this department.
z
Otherwise, the document is well written.
Sincerely,
Floyd Pittard
Fires deaf
FLP/nd
cc: Bob Santee, Tigard Water District
k
82
M
lea a- �/
WASHINGTON '
COUNTY,
OREGON
March 8, 1988
Robert W. Jean
City Administrator
City ofTigard
13125 S.W. Nall Blvd.
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Bob:
In response to your Draft Final Urban Services Study for the Bull Mountain
area, I would provide the following comments. This letter will also serve as
a response to your February 22 letter concerning coordinated city/county land
use planning and public facilities planning in the Bull Mountain/Walnut Area.
In reg6rd to the coordinated land use and public facilities planning, you are
aware the city has active planning responsibilities for a portion of the area
and the remaining area is within the area of interest of the City of Tigard.
Our department coordinates all development activity and planning within this
area with the City of Tigard. This approach appears to be working
satisfactorily. At this time I do not foresee any need to change this
arrangement, but I agree we need to work closely.
In response to the Urban Services Study I have asked my staff to review the
document. The study obviously shows the reasons for property owners to annex
to the City of Tigard. I believe it can be accurately stated that the
residents of Bull Mountain may indeed receive better public facilities and
services through eventual annexation. However, in reviewing the document it
appears that the authors present an overly bright picture of life after
annexation in the City of Tigard and at the same time, intentionally or
unintentionally, present an overly gloomly picture (and sometimes an erroneous
view) of existence in unincorporated Washington County. The following are
areas of the report which we believe are in error or need changes made in
order to present an accurate picture of before and after annexation.
1. Page 1, Findings:
Planning services are limited to case-by-case plan review at the
time of application, with little staff time for long-range planning;
83
Department of land Use And Transportation,Administration
150 North First Avenue Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 Phone:503/648-8761
Robert Jean
•. March 4, 1988
Page 2
Comment: The Planning Division of the Department of Land Use and
r`f"ansportation works almost exclusively on long-range planning and
related issues. The Planning Division currently has fifteen full-time
employees. The Planning Division work program reflects Board direction
and has placed major efforts during the past two years on major
transportation issues rather than community planning.
2. Page 2, Findings:
The County does not currently provide for storm drainsa in the
area, although a County Storm Drainage District and a per month
per household fee is under study;
Comment: Storm drainage is not provided in most of the Bull Mountain
areaTiecause it is still essentially rural. Recently approved
subdivisions have been required to install storm drainage facilities, as
a condition of approval, that are adequate to address their immediate
impacts and to accommodate future growth.
3. Page 2, Findings:
Service County/District Cid!
Police $ 85 (la 85d/thousand) $200 included in
Street Maintenance $ 60 (9 $60/year) City tax rate
f Street Lights $ 60 (@ 4-5/month) estimated at $2
Parks Q Recreation $147 (0 $1.47/thousand) per 1,000 ($2.03
actual in 1987-88)
Storm Drainage 24 (0 2/month' 1180 11.60/month
nnua os '376--Uu1 £n/Walnut ' 21U Tigan
Comment: This chart is misleading. It gives the 1 ression that the
City Ci f Tigard provides the same level of Parks and Recreation
facilities and services as THPRD, when in fact the City provides only
minimal facilities. The annual cost comparison would be more accurate
If the $147 for Parks and Recreation was deleted. I do not believe that
any of the study is currently in THPRD, and know of no efforts to expand
the district Into the Bull Mountain area.
The number used for street maintenance again is an estimate which the
Department has used in our work on the County Service District. This
number may be either higher or lower based upon action by the Board of
County Commissioners. initial estimates show that it will be lower.
This figure should be marked to indicate that the funding will be voted
on this June. Also storm drainage is identified In both the County
Service District approach and in the City, it is my understanding that
the Service District proposal will include all of Washington County
including incorporated areas. Therefore this number should either be
deleted at this time or a number should be used that is consistent both
inside and outside of the cities. The street light costs appear to be
high. On average in unincorporated areas of Washington County street
lights run between $45 and $50 a year. These changes would make a more
reasonable cost comparison for the Bull Mountain area at $223 versus the
City of Tigard at $218.
84
Robert Jean
•• March 4, 1988
Page 3
.. 4. Page 2, Findings:
Annexation includes long-range land use planning and public
facility programming services from the City at no additional cost;
Comment: This statement implies that the County charges extra for
long-range planning and public facility planning. The County finances
both services from the general County revenues.
5. Page 30 (introduction):
Growth and development is occurring under current Comprehensive
Plans with or without the adequate Public Facility Plans.
Comment: This statement is incorrect, Public facility master plans
ave een developed by USA for sewer service, by Tigard Water District
for water service, and by Washington County for transportation
facilities. Only a master storm drainage plan is unavailable at this
time.
6. Page 30 Conclusions:
Needed levels of urban services either are not available through
the County, or are available more conveniently and less expensively
for comparable services from the City of Tigard upon annexation.
Comment: This statement is not correct. All critical and essential
services, as defined by the Washington Count Community Development
Code, are available to those areas of Bull Mountain currently undergoing
development. Development cannot be approved unless services are
available. "Needed levels" should be defined or deleted.
7. sago 30 Conclusions:
Needed street improvements, like Bull Mountain Road and Walnut
Street, are unlikely in the foreseeable future without annexation.
Comment: This statement is misleading. It suggest that the City Is
able fo finance certain road projects. There is no objective evidence
to support the contention that the City of Tigard can finance major
Improvements to Bull Mountain Road and Walnut Street any sooner than
Washington County Is able to.
85
Robert Jean
March 4, 1988
Page 4
t 8. Page 3, Conclusions:
Meanwhile, each year without annexation means the loss of TIF
revenues out of the area, continued loss of abandoned revenues, and
the continued lack of long-range Public Facilities Plans
coordinated with the Comprehensive Land Use Plans, driving up both
the community's and the City's long-range casts.
Comment: Again, there is an incorrect reference to the lack of public
aaciT� plans. Also, no evidence is submitted supporting the claim
that unincorporated development adds "long-range" costs. It should also
be noted that approximately $126,000 in Traffic Impact Fees were spent
on Buil Mountain Road in con unc on with the Mountain Gate Subdivision
in 1987. During the same year approximately ;62,000 in TIF Revenues
were collected in the entire Bull Mountain area.
8. Page 5, What Annexation Changes:
Screats ° Washington County
All major road improvements are through LIDS
No local street maintenance now or form Local Street
District at $60 per year extra.
Comment: These statements are incorrect. Washington County uses LIDs
as"s one way of improving the county road system. In those cases where
( LIDs are used for major roads only the local road component of these
roads have been constructed with LID funds. This is true of 158th,
e Cornell Road, Kemmer Road and many others. The more common method for
improvement of the County major system has been state, federal, system
development changes and county road funds. The County does provide a
minimum level of safety and hazard elimination maintenance on the local
road system today. This amounts to approximately $3604000 in the urban
unincorporated area. The $60 per year is an estimate that has been used
as part of the proportion for forming the CSD for Local Road
Maintenance. This number may vary as the Citizen Advisory and the Board
of County Commissioners review the budget and scope of work planned for
the District. Preliminary indications are that this amount will be about
1S-20% less than originally planned.
9. Page 11, Land Use and Development Patterns:
Either exceptions include an R-5 designation for the Hawk Ridge
development on 150th Avenue and an R-3 designation for the
Mountaingate subdivsion in the Street of Dreams area. There is no
commercial or industrial land in the study area.
Comment: This statement makes reference to an R-3 designation.
Washington County has no such designation.
86
Robert Jean
March 4, 1988
Page 5
10. Page 19, Washington County 02000" Plan:
In order to cope with consistently under-funded urban services
programs, Washington County has proposed a plan to provide road
maintenance and police services to urban unincorporated areas until
these areas annex to municipalities - a process the County views as
inevitable. The County 2000 plan provides for "interim service"
until 1992-93, at which time the County expects annexation
procedures to be in place for most unincorporated areas.
The County 2000 plan is an attempt by Washington County to fit
limited resources to service demands in view of population growth
and the subsequent demands on urban services which result.
Basically, the plan covers two areas which need immediate attention.
Comment: This section does not completely describe the County 2000
Plan. I leaves out reference to the fact that 92-93 is not an absolute
end date for the provision of "interim service", but rather a review
date to determine if these programs should continue based on annexation
activity and cost-effectiveness.
Overall, the entire concept of County 2000 is not accurately reflected
here. The overall concept should be summarized as a decision on the
part of the County to fund only countywide services with countywide tax
revenues. Specially benefited areas or groups must pay their own way.
This can be done either through annexation to an existing city or
through estsbiishement of county service districts, which the County
and its unincorporated residents have elected to pursue on a limited
basis.
11. Page 20, Police Services:
Currently the response time for priority 1 and 2 calls to the
Sheriff's Office are in the neighborhood of 15 minutes or more.
For priority 3 or 4 tails the response time is up to an hour. For
some calls there is no response at all.
Comment: The statement "for some calls there is no response at ail"
suggests that some calls are ignored by the Sheriffs Office. It would
be more informative to stat: that some calls are handled over the phone
rather than in person. I would advise you to have the Sheriff comment
on this area since the CSD for enhanced Sheriffs Patrol is newly funded.
12. Page 20, Police Services:
The enhanced sheriff patrol district will be funded by a
voter-approved levy of $0.78 per 1,000 assessed value for property
owners. This translates Into $67.88 per year for a single family
dwelling valued at $87,000.
87
Robert Jean
March 4, 1988
Page 6
fA Comment: This statement is incorrect. The enhanced sheriff patrol
Zs`tr ct will be funded by a three year "fixed amount" levy
($3,371,000/year) with an estimated tax rate of $0.85/thousand of
assessed value in fiscal year 1988-89. Tax rates in subsequent years
will likely be lower.
13. Page 25, Planning� and Development Services:
Planningand development services are currently provided by the
Washingon County Department of Land Use and Transportation in
conjunction with the Neighborhood Citizen Participation
Organization for Bull Mountain. Their collaboration has produced a
community plan for Bull Mountain which is very general in nature
but prescribes some specific guidelines for development in this
area.
Comments: This paragraph strongly implies that Washington County g
ass prepared an abbreviated and makeshift plan for the Bull i
Mountain Area, This is not the case. The Hull Mountain Community
Plan was created individually over an extended period of time as
part of the Washington County Comprehensive Plan. It was developed
in accordance with the LCDC Goals and Guidelines, and received
acknowledgement of compliance from LCDC in 1983. This plan is an
specific and complete as any city plan in the County.
�- Conclusion: With the changes identified above I believe that the !
document would present an accurate picture of the situation in the Bull
Mountain area before and after annexation. I appreciate the opportunity
to review this document and provide comments to the city.
It you have any questions concerning my comment or would like any additional
information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Bruce A. Warner, P.E.
Director
c: Board of County Commissioners
County Administrators Office
Division Managers
CPO N4, Bull Mountain
BULLMT/br
88
t .. UNIEFTED SEWERA.GEAGENCYOFWASHINGTON COUNTY
August 3, 1988
Randy Clarno
City of Tigard
P.Q. Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Re: Sewer Extensions
Dear Randy;
Please consider this letter as written confirmation of our
telephone conversation this morning regarding procedures to
extend sewer mains in the vicinity of Tigard that utilize City
facilities.
When asked for sewer service that would require the use of City
facilities, Agency staff generally responds by either referring
the customer to the City of Tigard or requesting from the City of
Tigard permission to extend such sewer mains. The basis for this
practice is the City/Agency agreement dated September 8, 1970.
More specifically, the section providing this basis is as
follows;
"Section b. other Provisions.
A. The City and the Agency further agree that:
1. The Agency will not extend services to areas
outside the City and outside existing sanitary
districts except with the prior approvai' of the
City wh@re uae of City facilities is necessary
to serva such area, or where such areas are
contiguous to or in the near vicinity of the
City's boundaries. "
I hope this information proves to be helpful to you. Should you
require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact
MQ.
vQp"tjrul,y yours,
Bert C. C zr, Manager
Collection S tems Division
1 828
c: Chris Bowles
89
1 So North First Avenue,Room 302 Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 Phono:503/648-8621
EXCERPT FROM TIGARD COMPRUMSIVE PLAN
c. THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE URBAN SERVICES TO AREAS WITHIN THE TIGARD
URBAN PLANNING AREA OR WITH THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY UPON
�f.
ANNEXATION.
10.1.2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS OF LAND BY THE CITY SHALL BE BASED ON
FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING:
a, THE ANNEXATION ELIMINATES AN EXISTING "POCKET" OR "ISLAND" OF
UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY; OR
b, THE ANNEXATION WILL NOT CREATE AN IRREGULAR BOUNDARY THAT MAKES IT
DIFFICULT FOR THE POLICE IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION TO DETERMINE
WHETHER THE PARCEL IS WITHIN OR OUTSIDE THE CITY;
c, THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS COMMENTED UPON THE ANNEXATION;
d. THE LAND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA AND IS
CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY BOUNDARY.
e. THE ANNEXATION CAN BE ACCOMMODATED BY THE SERVICES LISTED IN
10.2 EXTENSION OF SERVICES OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS
F
POLICIES
10.2.1 THE CITY SHALL NOT APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF CITY OR UNIFIED CWERAGE !
AGENCY (USA) LINES EXCEPT:
a. WHERE APPLICATIONS FOR ANNEXATION FOR THOSE PROPERTIES HAVE BEEN
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY; OR
b. WHERE A NONREMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT TO ANNEX THOSE PROPERTIC3 HAS
BEEN SIGNED AND RECORDED WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY AND SUBMITTED TO
THE CITY; OR
t. WHERE THE APPLICABLE STATE OR COUNTY HEALTH AGENCY HAS DECLARED
THAT THERE IS A POTENTIAL OR IMMINENT HEALTH HAZARD,
10.2.2 IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF POLICY 10.2.1, THE EXTENSION OF
SEWER LINES OUTSIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS SHALL NOT REDUCE THE CAPACITY
BELOW THE REQUIRED LEVEL FOR AREAS WITHIN T14C CITY.
10.2.3 AS A PRECONDITION TO THE APPROVAL OF THE EXTENSION OF SERVICES OUTSIDE
THE CITY LIMITS, THE CITY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT 'OF REVIEW FOR ALL
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS OUTSIDE THE TIGARD CITY LIMITS BUT WITHIN THE
TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA (REFERENCE TIGARD'S URBAN PLANNING AREA
AGREEMENTS WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY). THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT
DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT:
a. PRECLUDE THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTIES TO URBAN
DENSITIES AND STANDARDS; OR
,
90
7#
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: August 8, 1988 DAIS July 29, 1988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly Report PREVIOUS ACTION:
Community Services Department for --�-----
1988 PREPARED 8Y: Donna Corbel
June _
DEPT' HEAD OK !. CITY ADMIN O7KE!jj RE.QUESIE,D By: Mesar, and Council
... POLICY ISSUi.
Community Services Department Monthly Report- for, June, 1988
._...._......_...»......,..,.,.__�.._._._._ ....�._.-,-�.� INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached as the Ccimmunity Services pep;-Artiiwnt Monthly Report for, June, 1988.
..,
FISCAL. IMP ACl'
_...._..._y._...�..._.�..__,..�...»»»».....y,.....,»..�._._...�.W_ ._._._._..3UGGEST'ED ACTION
Review and File
do:0009s
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council July 29, 1986
FROM: Jill Monley, Community 'Services Director
SUBJECT, Monthly Departmental Report for June, 1986
COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
We received proposal:; from three workers compensation carriers, interviewed those
carriers, and compared their cests .And sorvices. Based on a than ,u�3h roforc ncra
cheek, we decided to change earriera effective July 1 , Our new carrier is Liberty
Mutual.
The iransportaLion tuwn halls ware hold in o,arly June. Most of the prop work for
thc,so gown halls occurred in May. Tho Commitiuo mombors cunduc:tod the actual
n►r'eting thenloolvos whir:►► sooni}d to be r,ocoivod vary well toy cit:iXOns wt►u Cho" At'
attond and also (javo tho Committee montbar» a lit.l.lu different perruPOCL O On this
magnitude of the projects that they wc�ro acid reU'4in(J.
Thu Appointmonts Advisory Committpo mrat twic:o in l:aLu MAY And oarly Juno, 27 now
or, ro-••appointments ware! myacio. 'This bring; uu up to doto with c+11 of our, Committool'
(' and Boards, with no muni tor►ne ox0r'ir►ij u►►t.il Douofo or of 1900.
` Romodel and rearrangoment of thy+ Community %Mprvicou Doportmont was wort vd out in
Juno with actual changes to occur in oarly July,
VAMS 2NNF L.
IPPA nogotiiations hiavo boon int.onuivo this month. E)c)cauup wry arra tolking Abc►►at.
such major alterations, wo want to bo caroful that wo undorstand cloarly tho ahor't
and long rango impacts of any changos , for this purp000, on intorn from LOW# acrid
Clark has boon assisting both Ja►nico and Wayne in m*king th000 projoctions .
Tho above mentioned intern has also bean assisting un in dosigning aystomr►. OMCO
dosigned, those systems will be r?assy to maintain *nd will be very holpful to 4111
staff in being able to look at ra variety of porsonnol functions in different w+rys.
The City Administrator recruitment was begun. Advortisomonts were plarcod in
appropriate periodicals acrid newsletters, and the profile was developed.
COMPUTER.-SYSTEMS
The transition from an outside computer management firm to in-house operation of
our computer system began in June. The computer technician from that firm will
start 7/1/68, as an employee of the city.
The design and implementation of the police department computer system continued.
Several meetings were held during the month with Portland and Multnomah County on
�. system interties. A police department task force was started on computerization.
An agreement in principle was reached with UNISYS to resolve a community
development computer equipment problem. The community development staff helped on
a software evaluation for the new system.
1
C.S. Monthly report (con't)
FINANCE/ACCOUNTING
The sale of Bond Anticipation Notes for the 135th LID went very well. We sold
$1,200,000 in notes at 5.5% with funding now available. It is anticipated that
right—of--way acquisition and construction will proceed as planned.
The 1988-89 Budget was adopted on June 11, 1988. The document was printad and
distributed early in July.
As part of our continued implementation of our computer system, we have been
testing and training users of a centralized cash collection system. This system
will take several duplicated manual steps out of the cash receipt process and
should be in full use in early August.
the delinquent sower and storm drain process has now been ci.impleted, through our
efforts we wore able to collect $18,472 in delinquencies from 304 accounts. We
anticipate turning over 295 accounts for a total amount dues of $04.616.
About 1200 Tigard rosidonts are riot connected t;e) tl•►ea serwor syute►n► .and thorcv►foru do
riot rocoivo a monthly sewer bill . Wo bill thobe rouidont:a for utero► draina,3o in
Juno of each yocir, Those individual% worea billed in Juno and uaew for the firut
time, the nturvn drain►a�3P increase onactod by council last July,
488 N.C. Mot:zgur rosidontu rocontly a+nnoxod tea "t`i�J+ Wor,o a►ddod to our utility
billing system and recoivod their firut isowor sand storm drair►e+go billu from tho
city in July.
The Accountirvi toction roroivod 790 phoria► caallu, nearly twice wu m►any Calls a►wa
usual due to the dolinquoncy proceass, storm drain only billings, arui N,C, Meattgor.
;TTY RfRi�CIORAB
This office assiutod with suporvisory and job taauks in tho Court and rocordu
divisions while NAdin€t is on par-ontal leave. (it's a girl; Caitlin Ruael ) Work
continued on tho IMC update± projoct, the annoxation procous roviow, arid tho Rocords
Managomont Committ oo.
the major taauk complotod during this t.imo was Dartmouth JAMA filing. Over 100
hours ware involved and aapprox imaat'caly 2500 pages,
A traffic safety improvpmant bond bwllot nipasuro was davolopud with Councilor
Schwartz and then Transportation Committoe.
OF"F7CE_2t:RV1:CC S.
Once again, 52.9 percent of the projects submitted wears on ae rush basis. This is
understandable due to the nature of the current changes taking places within the
City structures. However, further education is forthcoming for staff. the Customer
Handbook is ready to be distributed which outlines the definition of rush projects
and the timelines involved.
In addition, the Office Services Manager will be reviewing rush projects more
closely over the next month to determine what types of projects are submitted as
rushes and to attempt to streamline the process for all concerned. We anticipate a
decrease in the number or rush projects submitted by CD due to some procedural
changes in that department.
2
C.S. Monthly Report (con't)
�^ Cindy converted diskettes. This process has now been completed which allows WP to
` archive from the Wang PC rather than using the disk drive in the computer room.
This will save tit►►e since we can now archive from the WP work area.
Office Support: Of the tasks performed 61.9 % were considered on a rush basis. It
should be noted that some Office Support projects are considered "rush" because the
task cannot actually be performed until a specified time; i.e., Tigard Times Ids
delivery, Council set--up and tear—dawn, attorney deliveries, etc.
Michelle Elliot was hired for the New Office Assistant I position at the
switchboard, She began work on July 5. tier primr►ry tasks will be lead switchboard
operator and Council packet assembly.
Office Manan►ennit, Work is continuing on acquisition of new copy n►at:hines and
poltoge equipment. fho in-house printir►g study is prograssing also.
flssiutanco was givor► in tho Community Services Dopartments rocent
re•-cor►figuration. This new arr'an!lamont' eF►ould provide for more of ficior►t work
iar'@a 13.
11iiT
Thu volume► of t.roffic citiat.tons prot.c�ssed P►r~a mi►ru thnn doublod over Bast fisctal
yoatr. FY 1986-07 tho Court pr'uco%iikd 3,013 tr'affi4; citot:ir,,ns or 301.1/1110, 17Y
1907.,,_00 tht{ Ct)urt proc0000d 7,`AY troaffic citiations or 625.:imo. It should b(I
notod t.h:at' i.ho court lyes avor,ac)od ak,out. 1!)0 cites par month dur•inI thu tart half of
FY 1987- 00.
In comparison, tho miacicim►awr►�ant ci►uult�,ad r��u►+air►c�d fairly utabla with otbout 151
ewes boing processed each fiscatl your.
1.n cc)mpatrison to other cou►•t.s, 1 igard is st,i.11 4,xporiencinq a bo+,tar, porconti-3p of
collactions. This iv duo to tho efforts of the c'ourt statf'f in workinij on
colleetions poriodicially +incl-► n►t►nth.
RECORU2
The Police Dopartmont's Record% Room and Property rvidonco Room contents wore movod
to allow workman to unl^rgo tho Locker Roes-: Rocords starf assistod by marking
boxes and physically moving those contents.
Staff is now inputting 1905 resolutions and 1906 ordinances into the Computer
system,
15 requests for information in the computer has resulted in an average responWa of
2 minutes per request.
The Dartmouth LUBA filing was a huge project and we project that over 100 hours of
staff time will have been spent by the time it is finished.
3
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT WORK MEASURES
JUNE, 1988
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: 6/87 6/88 SEWER: 6/87 6/88
Accounts Payable Checks: 389 360 Sewer bills sent out 6693 7457
Vendors 715 1069 Sewer payments 5683 6078
Check requests 392 375 Phone calls 440 798
Payroll checks 265 311 Treasurer's Receipts 2476 1262
Purchase Orders Processed 100 68 New Customer & Add. ? 383
chg. and Adjustments
OFFICE SERVICES Ax .6/88
Number of W,P, work ordors 616
Number of pages proc ossed in W,P. 3988 9
Avearrkge turn around time per WP Werk Order 5.6hr
Number of Offico Support Work Ordorx 218 f
NumbQr of paage� processed in Office Support 31.,w6
Averoge turn around Lime,/Offico Suppurl' Work Ordor 4.3hr �
Numbor of ;special/Ongoing Office Support Prcajectu 263
101 Thea mannor in which we pare kooping track of Offico ;3urvic os stat:i uticd hi j
chanc3inq. Wo, aro uopaircxting tho Word Processing atatistiry from Offico Support,
Thoraafuro, last yo4r's totals would be misleading. t
FIFRSONNFL
Rocruitmunts `a 3
Hiroo 7 3
tarminations 3 3
Unemployment: CI aims 0 1
Claims r`f lad: Workor'v Componsatiun 2 3
R[.CpRQCR-S_.0FF 7CE Year-to-D ato
Y87 O6fl
Resolutions processed 98 64
Ordinances processed 36 14
No. of Council Meetings 3 3
No. of Hours for Meetings 11 13
Agenda Items received, reviewed
and followed up on (if necessary) 58 66
Copy Volume for March CC Meetings 8,831
00099
4
07/01/88
CITY OF TIGARD
CLAIM STATUS REPORT
LOSS DATE CLAIMANT DESCRIPTION STATUS
2/04/85 Fredric Nickel Criminal counter cplt. open
(Officer Nal Merrill)
01/11./85 ** Harry Field Alleges False Arras:: CLOSED
(Office Merrill)
07/20/85 **, Steven Bacon False Arrest: (Officer Marburg) CLOSED
03/16/85 Julie B. Winkelman Wrongful Death pending
07/25/86 **, R.A. Cutshall Bike hit cable in park path CLOSED
07/10/86 ** Thomas Arnholte Mit manhole cover CLOSED
01/09/87 X*' Tuality Comm. Itoxp, Allege laity pay for treatment CLOSED
of minor child after officers
called to homa by mothor
boc:ause father was causinq
child abuso to infant.
Officer Boothby
10/17/87 xx Tort)sa Mario `,a►nchoz Tort Claim allogas axcassivd CL,O,>GD
uata of force during arrost.
Officor Killion
11/16/07 ** Carlyle Molquint Allege Tigard 11.C). was involvod in CL.OSLO
KonnuLh Cousins A shootirrg incident involvintl
clf+imants . Wks P►ava no record of
T,P,D. offi(:urs boing involvod. `
Cliaim was telt+o f,ilod atjtiinst.
Hills►buro P.D. 6 Wa. Co. Shoriff. ?
11/22/67 Ruouoll lonyder S4)wt.)r systom backup into home. open i
1"xtonsivu d+am,A(Ia.
7/2/88 City of l igiard atulon motorc.yc.lo hc+l►nat upon
Ofc, Harburg.
2/80 *0 Mark Colba►th Allogoll vc)hic:lc) was vtiandolixt►d CI(AS D
whilo in City' s impound lot .
3/22/00 Kont. R. Goida Allogos bodily herrn whilo boir►g upon
issuod citations. Ofe. F'oathorvton.
12/11/87 Jack Norman 171 by father Jack Norman Sr. — open i
Alleges City liable in traffic
mishap whon son struck by Mario
llcarnadoLte Winklur in crosswalk
4/23/88 Christophor Dean Olney Alleges Ofc. Nash signaled to open
move loft: but moved right causing
accident.
5/9/88 John 0, Umuda Alleges unlawful employment open
practices
*9 DUE TO AN AUDIT OF OPEN CLAIMS, THE INSURANCE COMPANY SI4OWS THESE TO BE CLOSED,
THEY WILL REMOVED FROM THIS LIST ON TME NEXT REPORT.
You will also nate there were no new claims in June, 1988.
dc:0009s
5
E
i
1
s
NON-STAFF RESOLIRCES/VOLUNTEER REPORT
3UNF:, 1988
Yl U FY 101'
CATEGORY 1985-86 1986-87 June, 19_88 1987-88 198788 '%_ Change
Boards &
Committees 3108.75 2601.75 297,50 2004,25 2804.25 -48%
Volunteer '
Staf'f'incJ 5171,25 7272, 662.00 7142.25 7142,25 -1% 1
TCYS N/A N/A _-0_ 11.90, 1190 N/A
Community
Service b62. 2387,2f) 158126 2501 1',0 2601 150 .45%
Othor 283 264.5 81
TOTAL: 10,73915 121525,'.1 11099, 15 12,448,00 12,448,00
cdc:00096
6
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: August 8. 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: July 28, 1.988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: GTAreement for PREVIOUS ACTION:
Greenbury Road bridge crossing of
_Ash - ek �� PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole
DEPT HEAD 01' _ CITY ADMIN OK \\z� REQUE_51 ED BY:
�...._.�._...._ __.____..,...._._......._...._---�-.-
POLICY ISSUE•.
Approval of an agreement: with GTE for sharing of costs related to the widening
of the Greenburg Road bridge at Ash Creek,
]NF ORMATION�,SUMMARY
The Council previously budgotod funds for widening of the Grooriburl Road
bridge at. Ash Creek, Design is nearly completo.
In ardor to widen the bridgo, it is neaco%iu4Wy to roloc,ate aurnu oxi!4ting GIT
talophono cables, CIE'. is rouponpiblo for, thc) rel.Ocatiun coats. 'Iha bridgo
contractor will mead to do curtain oxtra work to acconnnOdatea the cablo
roluccatiOn. UK) c0blo re 10"Aticxe hraa also rosultod in Aomo extra dosi;In work
for tho unginooring consultAnt.
Ther attachod agro011ivrit provides for GTL to roimburao the City for all itxtr4t
costa rolatod to the crablce r,olocatiun. GT't: has signod tho agr•oomont.. Council
approval ix rocuoutod
�NSTQt,RI'D
1, Approve tho contract,
2, Diroct that tho contract bo aniondod.
3. AbAndun the pru j eedt,
FISCIMPACT
Under ogreamant, G"IE: will Foray $3,0!lo to cover, additional canginaaring costs rand
GTE w9,11 pay 911 construction casts rolatod to raloc+atiun of the tulaphuno
cables.
SUGGFS'TED ACTION
Approve the attached agreement with GTE and authorize the Mayor to $ign the
agreement:.
br/6182D
nako i-0
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN ����
CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON
AND
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST, INC.
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT made as of the 22nd of July, 1988, between the City
of Tigard. Oregon, a municipal corporation, Washington County, Oregon (CITY)
and General Telephone Company of the Northwest. Inc., a corporation (GTE),
The CITY intends to widen a bridge on Greenburg Road at Ash Creek. GTE
owns conduits and telephone conductors which are on the existing bridge piers
and said conduits and conductors must be relocated to accommodate the proposed
bridge widening (hereinafter called the PROJECT).
CITY and G1E in consideration of their mutual covenants herein agree to
perform all ,acts contemplated by this agreement.
CITY and GTE agree that terms and references used herein are defined in a
document entitled "Contract Documents for the City of Tigard, Ash Creek Bridge
Widening Greenburg Road" dated June 1988, which is incorporated herein by
reference,
s,ECTItNd 1 PRAJFCT '
GTE transmission cables are located along the easterly side of Greenburg ,s
Road. The cables are enclosed in eight galvanized irr%n pipe (GIP) conduits
mounted on top of the existing bridge pili, caps. The GIP conduits go
underground at each end of the bridge and continue for approximately 20 Poet.
The conduits change from GIP to asbestos transite at a point approximately 20
foot southerly from the south end of the bridge and at a point approximately
20 feet northerly from the north end of the bridge and continues underground
as it leaves the site of the bridge and associated roadway approach wo, k, All
of the underground conduit is encased in concrete,
During the course of bridge widening construction work, the telephone
cable and conduits will be lowered approximataiy one foot as it crosses the
bridge structure. Lowering is necessary in order to remove the telophono
conduit from the space to be occupied by new bridge slabs. All work required
to move the cable and conduits will be performed by GTE. All parmits will be
provided by the City.
The order of work required to relocate the telephona cable is generally
butlinad in the project plans and specifications as follows:
1. The bridge contractor will have driven all piling and put in place all
Stago 2 measures for Protection and Direction of Traffic. Expanses
incurred for this work shall be covarad by a separate contract between tho
City and it's contractor.
2. GTE will, at its own expense and at no expense to the CITY. expose the
concrete encased bank of conduit for approximately 60 feet from the ends
of the bridge, both northerly and southerly.
3. GTE will, at its own expense and at no expense to the CITY, remove the
concrete encasement and the asbestos transite conduit from the telephone
cables, raise the GIP conduits approximately four inches. and place
temporary supports to hold the GIP conduits in that raised position.
4. The bridge contractor will cut off approximately two feet from the
easterly ends of the existing bridge pile caps for bent Nos, 1 and 3 as
shown in the plans, The bridge contractor will form and pour the easterly
portions of pile caps for bridge bent Nos. 1. 2. and 3 leaving the
rectangular notch, as shown on the plans, to accommodate the telephone
conduit. GTE shall reimburse the CITY for the cost of this work as
provided in 26 below.
5. After the pile caps have cured and the forms have been removed. GTE will.
at its own expanse and at no expense to the CITY, remove the temporary
supports and lower the GIP conduits into the notch in the pile caps.
6. GTE will, at its own expense and at no expanse to the CITY, roplace
conduits and encasement around their cables and backfill the conduit
trenches approximately 60 feat from each and of the bridge.
7. The bridge contractor will resume construction of the bridge and
approaches. - Expanses incurred hereafter shall be covered by a separate
contract botwoon the CITY and it's contractor.
It will be possible for some activities of the bridge contractor and GTE
to occur simultaneously; however, it is imperative that GTE have total arid
solo site access, except for protection and direction of traffic, during their
work in removing and disposing of materials containing asbestos. Except for
personnel involved in protection and direction of traffic, sill bridge
contractor work crews must be off tho vita during asbestos removal operations
unless approved by GTE. Asbestos removal operations may span a period of 10
to 15 consecutive working days. GTE is to be notified 5 days prior to site
being available.
SEt:TIQN 2 — PAYMCNTd
GTE agrees to reimburse the CITY for expenses related to design,
construction, and project administration reasonable in amount and necessarily
incurred to accommodate the telephone conductors and conduits as follows:
A. For design, GTE will pay the CITY $3,050.
B. for construction. GTE will pay an amount bid by the general
contractor for the CITY as stated in an affidavit to bra submitted by
the contractor at the time of bid opening, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
t
a
Y
S
GTE also agrees to pay additional costs as may be justified by
appropriate change order to accommodate changes in the work resulting
from circumstances beyond the control of the City, but necessarily
incurred by the contractor to accommodate the work of GTE.
C. For project administration. GTE agrees to reimburse the invoice cost
to the CITY For any engineering costs for special inspections,
processing change orders, progress payments or other work related to
engineering services during construction to accommodate the work of
GTE,
0. CITY shall bill GTE monthly for reimbursement as the CITY receives
invoices of expenses incurred, GTE shall pay within 60 days of
invoice from the CITY, Past-due accounts shall bear interest of
0,1633 percent per month starting 60 days after day of CITY'S invoice
to GTE.
SECTION 3 - FORCE MAJEURE
Neither CITY nor GTE shall be considered in default because of any delays
in completion of responsibilities hereunder due to causes beyond the control
and without fault or negligence on the part of the party so disonabled,
including, but not restricted to, an act of God or of a public enemy, volcano,
earthquake, fire, flood, epidemic, quarantine, restriction, area-wide strike,
freight embargo, unusually severe weather or delay of subcontractor or
supplies due to such cause; provided that the part so disenabled shall within
ten (10) days from the beginning of such delay notify the other party in
writing of the causes of delay and its probable extent.
SECTION A - N2N-WAIVER
C. The failure of the CITY to insist upon or enforce strict performance by
GTE of any of the terms of this contract or to exercise any rights hereunder
shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment to any extent of its
right to assert or rely upon such terms or rights on any future occasion.
SE�CTZON 5 - ATTORNEY'S rEES
In case suit or action is instituted to enforce the provisions of this
contract, the parties agree that the losing party shall pay to the winning
party, such sum as the Court may adjudge reasonable attorney's fees and Court
costs, including attorney's fees and Court costs on appeal.
SECTION 6 - APPLICABLE LAW
This contract shall be governed by the laws of tho State of Oregon.
SECTION 7 - INDEMNIFICATION
GTE agrees to indemnify and to hold harmless the CITY, its officers,
employees and agents against and from any and all losses, claims, actions,
suits, including coats and attorney's fees, for or on account of injury,
bodily or otherwise, to, or death of persons, damage to or destruction of
property belonging to CITY, GTE or others, resulting from, arising out of, or
In any way connected with GTE's sole negligence.
C
SECTION 8 — COMPLETE AGREEMENT
This contract and any referenced attachments constitute the complete
agreement between the CITY and GTE and supercedes all prior written or oral
discussions or agreements.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the CITY has caused this Agreement to be executed by
its duly authorized undersigned officer and GTE has executed this Agreement on
the date herein above first written.
CITY OF TIGARD
By: pL Date:
By: Date:
GTE
By Date;By:. Date:
ht/6055D
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND ESTIMATE
TO PROVIDE ACCESS FOR GTE CONDUIT RELOCATION
Special Provisions subsection 105.06 describes a sequence of events required in
the coordination of bridge construction and relocation of FTE transmission cables.
It is recognized, however, that the cost of extra work and coordination required
to accommodate the transmission cables on the bridge is significant, even though
considerably less than the cost to relocate along a non—interfering route. The
following task descriptions are envisioned as the extra work required by the
bridge contractor tz accommodate the GTE cables on the bridge. These tasks would
occur subsequent to placement of Stage 2 measures for Protection and Direction of
Traffic and after installation of piling on the easterly side of the bridge,
1, Remove cranes, excavators and other equipment, tools and materials from the
easterly side of the bridge and/or areas of proposed GTE work,
2. Rental of all devices required for Stage 2 Temporary Protection and Direction
of Traffic during period of 6TE work to expose and raise cable and conduit,
3, Maintain all devices required for Stage 2 Temporary Protection and Direction
of Traffic during period of GTE work to expose and raise cable and conduit,
4. Perform work required to cut and remove approximately 2 foot from the
easterly ends of the existing pile caps on bridge bent numbers 1 and 2,
S. Extra materials. tools, and effort required during construction of forms,
installation of reinforcement. pouring of concrete, and stripping of forms
for concrete pile caps due to interference of GTE cable, conduit, and
temporary support bracing. '
�. 6. Provide access for GTE to lower cable and conduit and reomovo temporary
support bracing.
7. Provide access for GTE to install now conduit, concrete encasement arid
backfill in trenches for approximately 60 feet from each end of the bridge.
0. Move back into place any cranes, excavators, and othor equipment, tools, and
materials that ware previously removod to accommodate GTE's work and will be
needed for the remaining bridge construction.
9. Other items as the contractor determines (please describe below):
The contractor has included in his bid a total prices of $
to accomplish the above work.
CONTRACTOR:
BY:
DATE:
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT
ht/6055D
4
CITY_ OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: August 8, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: July 18, 1988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution PREVIOUS ACTION:
accepting Smithson Sturm Sewer
public improvement PREPARED BY: Random S. Clar
DEPT HEAD O CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Community Dev1E. Deet.
POLICY ISSUE
-�.._...,....,.,..,,..,........,,.......�,...�......,�m..�....___-
INFORMATION tiUFN1ARY
1, The 133 Pout lung storm sewer line known as the Smithson Storm Sewor is
located .about 450 feet north of SW Siattlor Street and just west of 100th
Avenue, The line, and its uasumont, was created to facilitate the
development of a 0,41 acre tract.. Tho now alignment has ruxolved that:
problom,
2. "the public improvomont has now boon Uotisfact0rily complotod,
3, Thu Criginocaring Division cer•tifie►s that the► impruvemont is now acceptable
and that all roquiremeant.a have bvon Wit,
�.
A, Therefore, it is rocommondod that (in accordiinco with the terms of tho
project agrveamont) the City Council eaceOpt the public storm ar`wor•
improvement for City operation and maaint:onar►cea responsibility wend,
furth►enr, than thea Council authorixo role case of the okouur•anco bond.
%,;jQ NMjVU-S�CONS70FRI-0
None, tho (Citya-Dovolupor) project eigroomont spocifiod City 44ccupt;ancra upon
satisfactory compliation of all City requiromonts,
.,.,,.....................
.....w,... .W..... ....�
...�,�...�..,...�....,.W...._....._......,..._....��....�....W.........,�......._.�.,......,...,....F7',SCAL, IMPACT.
1. City ;assumption of responsibility for operation arid maainton+anca of thea
public storm seawear, improvexmont speacificd a►bovo.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Pass the Resolution titled: "A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN
AS SMIT14SON STORM SEWER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT."
cn/6035D
��• .moi/�� ���► � � i�
ri , * ♦ `��� ya
_� _- X11!■■ 1 i�� :�
rr■ r r . .
_
SEE 111
�
a
all
goimam
a KIM
41
�.. � �'� viii -: +•.
r rrl�. galla '�► �► ►■
Kohl - r
r
Ado
op
40,
0.0
Wo
Fjj
ILI
Rom
AW
r
J ,
"'444
t:.','. • � ' ° �n�..r •;� ` owns
f. �;� �. � ■��. it !� ��"II�i-
t M �2 � ����■011111 � � °-
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: August 8, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: JulV 25, 1988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution PREVIOUS ACTION: Placed on maintenance
accepting McDonald Acres uarantee period Res. X183-92
subdivision public improvements PREPARED BY: Randy S. Clar
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OKREQUESTEU BY: Community Devlp. Dept.
POLICY ISSUE
- T INFORMATION SUMMARY
1, McDonald Acres subdivision is located south of thio intersection of
SW McDonald Street: and SW O'Mara Street,
2, All public improvomonts havo now beacon satisfactorily complotod and have
withstood thea required one year maintenance quaranivez period.
3, Thea Enjinoorinq Division curtifioti that tho improvomunt is now accupt;ablo
and that all roquiromontu hAvo boon mot.
4, Thoroforo, it is rocommondod that: (in accor-donco with the twrms or the
projoct, agrecmer,t.) the City Council accept, tho public; improvomonto,
namoly m strout, %anitary and storm sowor vystom and utrootlitlhting for
City operotion and maintenanco, reoponaibility and, further, that the
Council authorizes ruloasu of the assurance balwnco,
iii'llr„o.= -„=.,,.e - m..,...,.,.. .. ALTF;RNAT'IVrS CANST,p RFI)
Nunes; thea (Ci ty-Dove lopor) pr,ojoct ogreemont spvcifi0d City 0CV0rat0ne:ea upon
sa►tia►feactury completion of all City requiromonts.
FrSCAL IMPACT
1. City assumption of rooponsibility for opearation and maintenance of tho
public improvoments spocifi.cad oxbovea,
.. ,. ...W,..
SUGGESTED ACTION
Pass the Rasolution titled: "A RESOLUTION ACCLPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT'S KNOWN
AS MC DONALD ACRES SUBDIVISION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.”
cn/6036D
- I
- ,:11[11 �■► � � ♦ �.
■O 111 I � � �� � ��'�S► �� '� �i :.,-
MIN
Inn
■ , ♦ ++ . '� ..sem: _:
rBig
��
111 n��"'u�► �I v � `�►�► ' I`�
mom
®�
�; y
_ lbod Area1k, JUNIOR
walk HIGH
i■ ;
SAM
SCHOOL
was
■
s __� ■ �� �_ --- � �- -.ice ��r � .. 111 ��
_loop ,
,_ .. _ �!� � 1 � AMM �� •
Our
jf
r
' � •i► � r 1� i�� � J ��/ice lillllEi
• � � it �111l�i1���� ��� �■ �� - •
t j t
y, s
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: August B 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: August 1 , 1985
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Partial Buyout of PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
Citicorp Lease
PREPARED BY: Wayne Lowry, Finance Dir
DEPT HEAD OK A � CITY ADMIN 0 REQUESIED BY: Bruce Olson, Com. Mqr
POLICY ISSUE
Shall the City Council authorize the early payment: of the microcomputer
portion of the Citicorp lease in order to obtain title to the equipment.
.�...........................�..,...,.�,....m.,,. .___--....--m-_INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City's mainframe computer and a microcomputer network of Burroujhs 820
equipment were purchased in 19136 througt► a 5-year loase with Burroughs Finance
Corp. The lease has since been purchased by litivorp.
Tho software vendor that was to provides ileoba►seti araappin�j applications to run
on the Community Duvolopmont B20 cluster h:as not porformod, Because no other
mapping software wondors design uoftwaaro to roan on E3urrouL3hs oquippiont for
this purpose, the Community Development Dopartmorit would like to acquire PC
compatible equipment for which is varioty of software vondors dasit3ra
appropriaato softwara, We ha►vo boon na43otiating with Burroughs to trade our'
axisting 020 clustor for Burroughs pe,)r•ry i)C comptatiblo equipment:, Wo ha►vo
reaachod a tentative Agr'ooment to maake such a trode aaL no c:oet to tho laity,
howovor, such o trach requires tho City to have cic,,+ar titica to the oquipmanl,
Duca to our, loouo au3rovmk1',L with Citicorp, in order- to acquire cicaatr, title to
tho oquipmont, wu must buyout: thaat; portion of thin leaoase ottributablo to tho
oquipmant being tra►dod. Citicorp has stalod that d count; to be $0,000. If
Council chooses to buyout this Portion of the lease, thQ City's reamaaininil
three loaase paymonLs will bo roducod aaccurAingly . The 5-YoAr Plan includes thea
remaining luaase payments .at the full amount of $69,170 por year, thor'vfcare,?,
this request requires moving $30,000 from th►a last two poymonta in the 'a-Yo,*r,
Plan to tho curr,cant year.
TIE! ff2`
1. Approve the buyout of the 020 portion of thea Citicorp leaaaser.
2. Do nothing.
n,unvu.rgn•.w ...u..,.uwuw..m,..ona.,rnm vn,n,m,.rn.v..n.r. m...nv..w,......... .,.,w:.u..nw,.nn.w,.,nnnn rv..n.nwr,.,n,.n. u
EW.,...W .....,.G.�,..,.:.,n,,...w..,..W..........,.,.Wry...........................�..............,,.. ,.:....,..,,.,.,. ,..._,w.,...,,,......,.,W..,.............,,W........_....�..,.._::...�.�.Yu__,....:_::j::.,:li,...�x,::_ v, ,::,
fISCAI._IMPAC'T
1. Brings forward $30,000 from year A and 5 in tho, 5-Yoaar plan.
2. Nona, implementation of mapping applications would be further, dolaayed,
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends alternative Ill.
ke/6221D
i
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCILAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY — (Local Conract Review Board)
AGENDA OF: August 8, 1986 DATE SUBMITI-ED: July 28, 1988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Authorize Bidding PREVIOUS ACTION:
For Street P acts
11 . PREPARED BY: Randall R. Wooley
DEPT HEAD 0 _ CITY ADMIN:OK 4 REQUESTED BY:
��_
POLICY ISSUE
Shall the City Engineer be authorized to advertise for bids for three street:
projects?
���� �...._._�...�...._...._..__�....^mmINFORMATION SUMMARY
The City Engineer is nearly ready to go to bid on threw str•eot projects, Per
City purchasing rules, Local. Contract Review Bo.Ard authorization is nodded
before a►dveartisomonts for bids are placed,
The three projects are:
1, McDonold SAraet bikoway improvomonta,
2, Grounburg Read brid90 widoning at Auh Crook.
3, Strout ovor,loy project .
Thu straeats uoloctod for ovowloy are Caucodo Aviinwo from Power Renta to tho
sham curves near acholia rorry Road, And 121st Avonuo from :chollr 1orry Road
to Summar Creack . Theso veru two locations whore ovorlay new is :,xpvctvd te.►
�. substantially oxtond the pavumunt: life,
At:T("RNATIVCS CONSIDERCO
1, Authorizo advurtisumont for bids,
2. Withhold aeuthoriration.
riSCAL.,.,IMPACT
All three projects arra included in the 1988,89 bud(3ot under, Stratats CIP.
Budgatod amounts aura:
McDonald Street Dikoway $ 6,200 (local match fur, States grant)
Greunburl/Ash Crook Dridga $150,000
Overlays $ 70,000
SUGGESTED ACTION
Authoriza City 'EngiAeor to advertise for bids on the throe projects listed
above,
br/G182D
r
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: August 9 1988 DAlE SUBMITIED: July_____ 9'1988 —
ISSUEJAGENDA TITLE' Design Plan PREVIOUS ACTION: Review of City Center
Request for proposals for City Ctu_y area Plan Work Pro ram I
Center Stud rea PREPARED BY: Elizbeth AAnn Newton :
DEPT NEAR OK CITY ADMIN O^ REQUESIED RY:Cit Center Plan-Task Force
POLICY ISSUE
th► o � � ? ► release
Requestf Proposals
Should r the City C.rtOr
allow a qualified ►� nsultanC tprepare aes
Study Area?
I.NFORNATIONTS��...UNG•1ARY
At a wor•kohop held on Juno 13, 1968, between the City Council and City Center
Plan Task Force a work proilran► for FY 88_89 outlining the tasks and tia►alinas
for the "City Canter plan" was distributed. A desitlr► plan was listen as on
no
of the alun►ents,
"i he primary emphasis of Aho do Plan will will bo to propiaro desi,in -Juiduli.nos
arid contoptual ploar►s which ri ora 11y ai�rard tdovolaarmunt ro,iLo tho �pot�onti;al od `�roIn +dditJOCtt ri an
at enhancing the City Contac 3 r ►t►ic r•o ►ruuontationu
to r•ocummondinij -;uidulinos Aancd concaapt►aal prujaacts, '+af Fhe
will bu pra.pAarod to bo used in pr•esontotiono of thio City Center Phan to t
Public oaftor• romplot:iun of tho study. Staff will dovoloP do►si(.ln otancdardu to
ba a.roaad On impls�mar►taatie►n of thea otutdy. if
by Council,
Attoachod is a Rutu9ut1f ur P o�o rAlu which,
dt►cost iutn►otito�dw�rccNKd $70,000-will be
ralaraarad �►n A a� �
1, Autt.or Sze the rela�faso of tho Roquout for' Pruposoalu for City Caantaar Deui�ln
til^n Consultant oat a rout riot to oxc.00d $20,000,
2, DalAy ection on the R<aquost for Propnuoalr.
FTSCAI. r.MPAi�T
Tho tuntaative budg(wt for, the study is riot to excood 0, 00 tr •)hou d Council
approve the expendituro, the dollars. will be appropriated'iaat +
from
contingency at the bid naword.
-_.�.:�._ _...�_..��.....___............,._......W-SUGt1ES7E11r ACTION
Motion to authorize release of Request for Proposal for City Canter Design
Plan Consultant at a cost not to exceed $20,000.
br/6211D
TM
Request for Proposals
Page 1
r
CITY OF TIGARD
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
CITY CENTER STUDY AREA — DESIGN PLAN
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
The City of Tigard Community Development Department requests proposals from
qualified design/architectural firms to prepare a design plan for the city
Center Study Area. The primary focus of the study is to develop design
guidelines and conceptual plans which visually illustrate opportunities for
enhancing redevelopment.
To prepare the plan in a timely mannvr, the City of Tigard proposes to contract
with a qualified firm or individual(s) to perform the serviceas outlined in the
Scope of Services. The successful firm or individual(s) shall have demonstrated
expertise in downtown planning, the development of design guidelines which blond
a variety of land uses, and expo.>rionco doaling with public agencies. rurthor,
the ,ability to produce quality work within the gimes frame for a reasonable feu
will be critical,
BACKGROUND
In mid--1907 the `Ii(It►rd City Council appolntod a seven member Center, City Plan
Taask i'orco to develop a plan for the roay.it.a9lieAtion of tho city conLur ore.►a.
9'.n the mor►th►s since formaation, the TA-ak Force ticco surccaosfully c.ompletod several
key tasks. Thoso have included: defining the boundarieas of thea study area;
identifying and asseassirig physiraal and sgooagraphiCox l Iimit.aotiono and
# opportunition; and ruviowing uxiating xoning rogul.at:ions ayr►d developinq new
interim zoning standards, A Vision Sttatomvnt that dasr.riboa the broad purposou
and *spirationv of the c,ommit.teu'v pWrinipg effort is included in this RVP (see
aattar,hod).
to support its continuing efforts, tho City haam complotud a market evaluation of
the study arena which included an analysis of how maarWt opportunities can be
enhanced in thea study saroa. A copy of the Consultant's mumm,ary recommondaations
is aettaachod. In addition, as consultant study is undor-way to axplorea arid
ovalua►te a►►ltornact:ives for aeccsass arid traffic circulation in the City Conter
study aaroax, Tho City has also contracts+d with a4 consultant to produce Prarks
MAstar, Plans which, as part of that offort, will identify possible improveame+nts
to Fanno Crook Park. In addition, the City is in tho process of reviewing
proposals submitted to proparo a financial plan which will evaluate tho
feasibility of tax incroment financing and other aavaailablu funding sources for
financing potential projects within the study area.
DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA
The study area is shown on the attached map.
The area currently supports a wide range of uses, including government offices,
professional services, retail businesses, personal services, and miscellaneous
.:' business activities. The City Center exhibits a mixture of new and old
buildings. The majority of the new construction has been east of the railroad
right-of-way, which bisects the area.
Request for Proposals
Page 2
Light industrial uses have developed adjacent to the railroad tracks along
Burnham, and to a lesser extent, on Commercial Street. The industrial land on
Burnham provides space for small scale industries such as cabinet shops, machine
shops, and contractor's offices.
Tri—Met serves the downtown with three bus lines. A transit transfer station
recently has been constructed on Commercial Street.
Public services located in the downtown area include the City Nall, Post Office,
Library, Fire Station, Youth Service Center, and offices for water and telephone
services.
The mixture of land uses in the Downtown is shown in the attached existing land
use map.
TENTATIVE SCOPE OF SERVICES
A tontativo lint of issue% to be addro%sod in the study has boon doveloped, i'ho
item% outlined %hould bo consida red as a proliminary scope of work. Tho lint
will baa refined as key i%%uos are prioritixed and is final %copo of se.rvico%
ag rood upon by tho City and the consultant. !lased on tha isauoa idontifi.ed
below and the? attached "Vision Statomor►t," the consultant will prvparo do%ign
guidealineas and concoptual plans which illustr•ataa thea roconmondaation%.
T'ho i%suou and quo%tions to bo Addro%sod aro a% follow%:
o Ther Vision Staatomont pro%onts the "City in tho Park" au a possiblo thaamea for,
the City Cont.or. Sinco tho city c.onter area currently lack% a %trung imager
or identity, could deavolopmont alum! +a common themo providea thaL identity?
Wheat a►r,o other possiblo t.homos that the area could taken advantage of'?
o The Vision Staatomont portr,iaay% a city cantor arca with as primary circulaatior►
%y%term which eampha%ixos podostrian u%o. lying to a possible thomer, how
might the following itom% be oddrossod to unc:oura90 podoutriAn a%9c
— the provision of public transit and convonient. Wcrations for tac.coss to
transit services
— location of pedestrian ways
-• design of pedestrian ways (width, proximity to p+a►rkirig, streaeats,
materials)
— pedestrian amenities (places to sit, information kiosks, drinking
fountains, trash receptacles, ;and signage)
— design sensitivity to the physically limited
— provisions for bicycle traaffic and parking
-- weather protection
o Fanno Creak Park is highlighted in the Vision Statement and the Market Study
evaluation as a feature that is unique to Tigard. Now might the following
be addressed to emphasize the park:
-� The entrances to the park from Main Street and Hall Boulevard.
— The design guidelines appropriate for residential end commercial uses
which are adjacent to the park to ensure continuity along the park edge.
Request for Proposals
Page 3
/ - How the design elements which characterize the fanno Creek Park entrances
l can be used in Main Street and Liberty Park and other entry points into
the City Center.
o The market study suggests that a variety of land uses could be accommodated
in the City Center Study area. How might zoning standards related to the
following be developed to accommodate the variety in land uses and still
provide continuity to the area-
- Building setbacks
- Building hoight
- Landscaping requirements
- Parking r•oquiramonks
-- Building ret►aWilit:+t:ion
- Building facade design including awnings
o "Iho market study idontifios transportation improvoment ti an import ant stop
in onhanci.ng the devolupinont oppurtunitios in the study 4+roa. The design of
stroot. improvemont.s should bo consi;aont with othor douic3n olomentu.
Spocific itoms to be aaddraxsad tiro:
- Stroot treos
Lftndsccapod islaands or mudiaan stripm
Stroot furnit.uro (includinj bonchos, biannors, plAr►tors)
u Thy potonti«al for a vArioty and mix of Land uuou in thea study ,xroa protionts
additionwl design cunsidareatJons, includir►g:
- Douign guidolinou which oro sonuit.ivea Lo thea quality of life issueas which
impact rusidont.14 land usos .
- Dosign guidolinou which blond mixod and/or Adja►cont band umeas .
- Dasign guidolinos for, uubtaropk;i of tho City Contor which may racceammodAto
difforont typos of load usos, i ,o, , Main Stroot., Ournhiam Stroot,
- Design ejuidolAinou to dofino tho odgoo of tho City Cantor atlong Hall (Ilvd.
- Dosign guidolinos which onhaanuo the view of tho City Cantor aaroea aau loon
from Poe;i.fir Hwy.
- 0sksign guidralinezo that cunoidear uafoty mainton+anco rand t►rrr.urity,
0 The market: utudy uuggostu that the► ovorlying objoctivo of the developmeant,
strategy should bo to ottrarct privwtea invoutmont. 7o what extont might
ownears and/or morcha►nts bee eneouragod to paarticip,Ato in thea following and
what progrran►u axrid/0r, policies might bo implem►eantod to promote participation,
- rehabilitation ref' privately ownod buildings
- financing and copit.aal inveotment in public nand/or private projects
designed to improve the function and image of the city center-
-
enter-- paarticipe+tion in programts for continued maintenance of the city Center
area public improvomeants
0 in order to implement the development strategies outlined in the market
study the property owners and merchants should become involved. How might
the owners and merchants be encouraged to participate in the development of
the overall design guidelines and project implementation.
Request for Proposals
Page 4
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
The proposal should include:
I. Names and qualifications of individuals to perform the work. Include the
estimated hours and specify hourly rates for each team member plus other
expenses by major category.
11, An outline of how the consultant will proceed with the work.
III. Prior experience and references of at least one or more municipal
entities for which the respondent has prepared a similar plan. Include
the name of the organization, the contact person, and telephone number,
IV, Scope of services which describes the sorvicos to be rendered including
specific phases and the estimated time fraena for completion of each phase.
V. Total fee for the proposed work on .an hourly basis with a n►aximua► time
that indicates:
1, Amount of time and budget to be oxpende-d by principal(s);
2, Amount of time and budgot to be oxpondod by author staff mvmbors;
3. Amount of budt3ot Eallocatvd to matorirals and vxpotisols.
VI. Stat:omeant regarding ;ability to ce,mploW the projoct within the dof inod
time frame.
FUNDING
Tho City of ligaard hae, identified an votimiktod bod(Jet of up to $20,000 for this
project: to cover all costs of t:ho study, 1ho propoaod foo will be carefully
waighod against thea tcaaam's experionco and quAlfivat:ions, and will by ccansidored
in the soloc:tiun procoss,
r1NAL PRODUC1`
`f'he City axpocts to ut,ilizo the final products ad prosontntion ma►tvriaalas. At a
minimum, final products should includes
A written repast which summearixaas the consultant's recommondod dosign
guidealinus and policies to implcameant recommondod projects and programs.
A graphic representation which illustratus thea design plan for Main
Street. The entire length of the street should ba included and the level
of detail should show realistic conditions,
A graphic representation of a section of SW Durnham Street which
illustrates the recommended design plan.
Drawings illustrating "typical" street furniture, planters, light
standards, etc. Include recommended locations and estimated costs.
— A graphic representation of the design plan recommended for the park
entrances at both ends of Main Street.
A list of top priority projects and their estimated costs.
Request for Proposals
Page 5
NUMBER OF COPIES
Each proposal must be accompanied by seven (7) copies.
CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
The City of Tigard's standard form of contract shall be used for this project.
The consultant will be required to carry insurance in the types and amounts
specified by the City in the contract.
BASIS OF AWARD
Farms will be selected on the basis of their relative experience and
qualifications as stated in the proposal and as determined in subsequent
interviews, factors which will be especially considered include:
m- Rasponsivanoss to this RFP,
Quality of the study methodology to be employed,
— Experience and qualificationu of the firm in similar, projects.
-- Tho proposed fee,
— Ability to meet the project schodule,
_ — Ability of firm to provide realistic:, rotponuive recommendations its
demunstratod by previous similar work oxporioncos,
— Degrees of involvemont by princ:ipa►l(a) ,
Exporionco arid ability in working with interested citiewuns and local
businoss► interests,
CITY DATA
The City shall provide to the► seloctod consult.tant the following;
— Copide of the City of TigArA zoning codes and Comprehunaivca Plan policies ,
— Copiou of previous urban dosign studios and plans,
Aerial photos, f;►Asea maps, otc., indicating the bour►dorios of :ha City
Center Study Aroa.
Available traffic and traarioportaation information related to the aarea.
Staff support to interpret City policy documents,
-- Information provided to the City by other, outside consultants on
transportation, the turket avwluastion, design elements, and parks.
— Scheduling and preparation for meetings with thea City Center- Plan Trask
Force and City Council.
— A copy of the downtown inventory which contains dota►iled informaation ern
avary piaca of property in the study area including a►asassed value,
building condition, and rents.
TTME_LINE
Proposals submitted August 23, 1988.
Finalists interviewed week of August 29, 1988.
Bits award September 12, 1988.
Final recommendations in draft form due January 15, 1989.
R
Request for Proposals s
Page 6
E
i
t._ A more formal time line will be established during contract negotiations
including the number of meetings with the City Center Plan Task Force, staff, 1
City Council, and citizens.
i
DEADLINE
Proposals must be submitted and received by Noon on August 23, 1486, to:
E
E
Elizabeth Newton
City of Tigard
1.3125 SW Nall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 972.23
Quostions regarding this project should be dirvc:ted to: EIizabeth Newton or, Ed
Murphy at (503) 639-4171,
i
ht/6166U `
Attachmontu
I
wil
E
t
i
t
E
t
F
pE
i
w
4
i
E
s
4
r
i
f
i
k
k
I
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY—Local Contract Review Board
AGENDA OF: August B, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: July 28, 1988
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW 135th Ave. 'PREVIOUS ACTION:
L.I.D. -- Sid Award
PREPARED BY: Randall R. Wooley
DEPT HEAD OI< CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
Approve bid award for, construction contract on SW 135th Avenue,
���� .��....,...�.. INFORMATION SUMMARY
Bids for SW 135th Avenue construction will be opened on August 2nd. Bid
results will be available prior to tt►e August 8th mouting,
ALTt:RNATIVkS CONS1()rRt".D
1, Approve► owaird of contract to lowest qualified bidder.
2. Rejoct all bids,
1
i
�'•�,u. wy,�. ,..;.W:rW:..»...,W_,.ti.wy W;�.-:y 2. _.
W ....,,..>
�I.�r.AtIMrAt�T
Will be evaluated after the Laid opening.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Recommendation will be provided after the bids are opened and evaluated.
br/6182D
�i� ,Q� �y'�'c� -�•��'rc��e ..Zsc c. `�999, !2�.�D
/Q jI �. �`lc�e� �v'tis�crrrr�rr;� �• * /i d�1�, .335, Zo
7,l 73.1 0
d[d
L ID
Ip .s�i�•e (r�i��dye� /2 D, D 2 . 39
r
Z7.S )
7
f
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: City Council August: 5, 1988
FROM: Keith Liden, Senior Planner
SUBJECT; 20A 88-01 Hotels/Motels as Conditional Uses in the I-P Zone
In response to Councilor Johnson's concern regarding the number of
hotels/motels that might be possible in the 1--P (Industrial Park) ..cone, the
staff has reviewed some possible options to address this issue.
Distance Reguire�ement:
A standard could be, dowelo,ped to require a specified distor►ce or spacing
between hotels/motels, We have found no examples of this tochniquo (with
the exception of .,adult onto*rtAinment), and establishment of workalJe
criteria and clear rAtionalea would be difficult,
Part of a ar;ger Dovelopmeri
Hotels/motel» could bo limited as only a componant of a larger devolopmont
in similar mannor to tho way comn►arcial usou ,aro preasor►tly 4110wad to
occupy up to 20 per,pnt of thea floor, a►roaa of ca project, lhis would limit
they numbor of ho►tolu/mot:ulu bocauuo only Lartior propurtiou (0,e3. 15x25
ac;rou) would roaliutically be eligible,
Qve►rl,�y., 7�rte�
the C:1 (Ciampuu 3nduutrioal) re,no ;In i)vave►rton eut..,ablio�huu "t)owelopa►eant
Control Arods" for uovora►l Cl districts in the City fur' thin pur•pouo of
imposing a+dditiorual roquiremontu , betels or,d mo►telu aro 61100ed At' as
conditional use if at le4aut 50 porcont. of tho parcolS within tho
applicable, [)e*velopmont Control Aro" are dovelo?ped, though the logic
behind this critori,a is round (buuinuusou must os ist first beaforo as
ho�ltl/n►t�tul can rt)rvo thong), tha erttabli»hn►unt of an ovprlaay xo►r►u or
district aurid accompeanying critoria will be Gaotuntially difficult to
ft)rmulote and admir►i.ster.
Staff recommends adoption of the ordinances amendment Au pru!uuntod to Council .
The staff sharreas the concern of "opening up" the 1...,P tone for unrolatod
commercial uses, but it; appoars that the location of the City's I-P tuning
districts and market forcers will acct to limit h0t0l/1110t0l usce, The C-P
(Commercial ProfQssionral) tone, which is intor►dod for, office use, allows
hotals/motcals as aea permitted use. The C--P propertieas often haves frucaway or
arterial visibility, but since tho adoption of the present Cods in 1983, the
City has riot: reviewed any hotel/motel proposals in this tone.
We will be gland to discuss this issue further during the second reading on
August 8th. The applicant, PancTrust, has offer-od to have as commercial broker
specializing in hotels/motels available on the 8th to answer questions.
Please contact moa on the 8th if you would like any additional information for
Monday night.
cn/6344D
DRAT/ CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA
FOR HOTELS/MOTELS IN THE I—P ZONE
C
18.130.150 (30) Transient Lodging in the I—P zone;
A. Site size shall be a minimum of two acres and a maximum of
five acres.
B. The hotel/motel shall not exceed 20% of the entire floor
area square footage of the development complex. The floor
area of the hotel/motel use and those allowed in Section
18.68.030(2)(0) in combination shall not exceed 30% of the
entire floor area of the development complex,
C. The site shall have accessn be approved by the City "
Engineer to an arterial or major collector street with
capacity sufficient to ensure that adequate access to
local businesses is maintained.
A, signage shall conform to Chapter 18.114 of this title,
E, Sad and breakfast use shall not be permitted.
C
br/63730
C"
f c,M ey)GLf_CI
EXHIBIT "A" ord &-s—go
18.68.050(5) The maximum site coverage shall be 75 percent, including
f buildings and impervious surfaces. The maximum site coverage may be increased
lY to 80 percent if the provisions of 18.68.05i,ii)are satisfied.
(6) The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 25 percent of the site area,
exce t hat a reduction to 20 percent of the site may be approved through the
develo m t review process when all of the following performance standards are
met'
A. Thea roved landscape plan shallprovide-
III
Stre t trees as required b Section 18.100.035 are to be
insta ed witA .h a minimum caliper of 3" rather than the 2" at
four 4 feet in height required by 18.100.035(a).
The landsc- in9 between a parking lot and street property line
shall have a inimum width of 10 feet,
JU All applicable ufferinq, acreeninq and setback requirements
shall be satisfiaa
B. The applicant shall or a documantation of an adoguaate on-going
maintenance program to ansu anorooriato irri ation and maintenance
of the land.caeo aroa,
16,60,040 LAI Transient L.odgin�
10,130.150 JJOj Tans en& Lodging in the T-P na:
A,i 51,E si�ro bh�n be a minimum of acre�p sand a maximum of
time acro..
P.j. Thg site 2hall a s a .Co.. be ro od by the City
to an ar er for trae t
of a o yro that 0 ueaf:A__����M
local bu�tta�ro_t�� s ma�nta4, ,nad,� --
C (ancillary wase, c ,tad 4n Sact4on 18.U8,030 2 0 shall be
allowed as , into ral a eamonts of the Cond tonal Used
providod thou ^rp doeicanad to moat tho 20 a Ant float
arca limitations to Sactt,n 18,68.030(2)(0)
D. Signage shall conform to Chapter 18.114 of 4-h4a Title
br/5958D
7
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: August B 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: July 29, 1988
ISSUE/AGENDAlTITLE: Call for PREVIOUS ACTION:
Election on Traffic Safety_ _
Improvement B nd PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole
DEPT HEAD O CITY ADMIN 0 REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
Shall the Council call for an electit�n fur a bund measure to finance major
streets traffic safety improvements?
_,.�._-�.-_- �_.���.�.....,...�.........._�...._.�..�.._._.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Following the July 18th public hoaring and Council discussion, a resolution
has been proparod calling for a $8,500,000 bond iiwa:►ure on the N(mven►ber bAlet
to fund str,eot in►proven►ent:s. The attactjod m«mo describes the street
improvement prujoct list, revised in acr.ordokncu with tho July 18th discussion.
At,�I FRNATI V[" 3n,CpNS7[1E F2E;11
1, Approve► the Atta►chud rasolutiun calling for a bund oloctiun on tho
A Novomber ba►l lot.
2. Reviva tho rosolut:ion.
} 3 . Postpono projoc.t funding.
I'ISCAt�IMPACT
Tho band nwasuro. would bo for, $0,500,000 of stroot improvomonts to bo paid
over a 10-yoar period.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Approval of the attached resolution,
br/6102D
4
Jill
p
MEMORANDUM
�- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Mayor and Council July 29, 1988
FROM: Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Major Streets Traffic Safety Improvement Bond Measure
Following the July 1.8th Council meeting, we have carefully reviewed the
project descriptions kind cost estimates for the top projects identified by the
Council and the Tranuportation Advisory Committee. Based on our review, I
feel comfortable that the top ten projects identified can be completed for the
$8,900,000 proposed. Attached is a list showing the top ten projects, the
approximate cost of each project, and a brief description of each project.
The projects are now listed in alphabetical order. All ten projects as a
group are now considered to be the top priority.
If the bond measure is approved by the voters, it is intended that all ten
projects will be completed within the funds received from the band a+aless. We
expect that most of the projects can be completed under the estimated costs
shown on the nttached sheet. However, it is likely that some of the projects
may slightly exceed the estimnted costs shown. It is intended that any
project overruns would be hnlnnced by other project underruns so that no
additional funding approval would be required so long an the total costs of
the ten projects do not exceed the proceeds from the bond sale.
In areas where development is continuing, some of the proposed improvements
may be completed by developers. In other ar€as, wnivers of remonstr4nce from
past developers may be available to provide funding for a portion of the
construction costs through an LID process. Also, grant money sometimes
becomes available for specific projects. We would expect to continue to
inventigAto all of these sources to help roduct, project costs.
The, project descriptions shown are still general concept descriptions. No
detailed enginer.,ring has been completed for these projects. If the projects
are authorized by the voters, detailed design will follow. During detailed
design, we would expect to work with adjoining property owner.a, Affected
neighborhoods, and NPO's to address specific design queations and to review
design options which may be Available.
Wo have also reviewed possible project schedules. Because most of theme
projects require Some acquisition of right—of—way or easements, it is unlikely
that most of them can be constructed in the first year. Perhaps one or two of
the projects can proceed to completion in 1989, but most of the projects will
probably be scheduled for 1990 construction. Some will probably extend into
1991 for completion.
Because the oroiect construction will extend over a two or three year period,
we can expect the cost to rise slightly as a result of inflation. 1t the same
time, because the bond proceeds will not all be expended immediately, the City
Will receive some interest income on the bond proceeds. Our preliminary
0. ' review with the Finance Director indicates that inflation impacts will be
offset by expected interest income. Both inflation and interest projections
have assumed that the interest and inflation rates will remain generally
stable over the next three years.
Memo to Mayor and Council
Major Streets — Traffic Safety Improvement Bond Measure
July 29, 1988
Page 2
On the attached project sheet, we have revised several project descriptions
slightly as a result of input received at the July 18 meeting, as follows!
° The Transportation Advisory Committee has recommended that the Gaarde
Street/Pacific Highway intersection be improved by realigning Gaarde to
intersect Pacific Highway at McDonald Street. The cost estimate covers
this proposed, project. It is possible, however, that during design and
neighborhood input that a somewhat different intersection improvement might
be selected. The project description has been revised to allow an
alternative design if appropriate.
° Our detailed review of the Greenburg Road project identified substantial
drainage improvements which will, be required in conjunction with Greenbur.g
Road widening. To offset the coats of these necessary drainage
improvements, the signal At Cascade Blvd. has been deleted from the project
description, if funds sr.e available, the signal, could still be installed
under the general item of intorsoetion improvements. I have verified in a
discussion with .Toe! Schweitee, chairperson of the TranaportAtion Advisory
Committee. that the- Cascades nlvd. signal was not as high s priority to the
Commits€o Aa the actual widening and other improvements on Greenburq Rosd.
° The scope of work for .he Main Street project has been revised no directed
by the Council. Specific access Improvements and intersection improvements
will be aelected batted on the City Center Plan developed later this year.
° The project deacri.ption for Wnl.nut Street has been Amended to clarify that
tho project ends near 106th Avenue, nt they point where City jurisdiction
currently enda.
During the public testimony on July 18th, there were requosts from Summerfield
residents to consider a noise barrier along Durham Road. It appears that there
will be an onportunity to substantially improve the noise barrier between
Durham ?toad and the Summerfield development during construction. Alternativen
will be reviewed during detailed project design. The auggestion of installing
a high berm along the roadway is probably not feasible due to the limited ®pAce
available between Summerfield and existing developments to the south. However.,
other alternatives, such no oubatnntiAlly lowering Durham Road or augmenting
existing sound walls in tselrcted areas, Appear to be quite ftasible.
If the bond measure in approved by the voters, the resulting construction of
ten major street improvement projects will be a major undertaking for the City
of Tigard. We would expect that moat of the design and inspection work would
be done by outside consultants, as the resulting workload would be much too
great for our existing staff. Even so, we will be budgeting for substantial
staff time to coordinate the consultant work and to assure that design is
properly coordinated with neighborhood and property owner groups. The prospect
of being able to address street safety concerns throughout Tigard on such a
large scale is an exciting prospect. We look forward to the challenge.
br/6189D
IF
PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED BY
TIGARD MAJOR STREETS TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENT BOND
(i£ approved by voters in November, 1988)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPROXIMATE COST
A. BONITA ROAD, between Hall Blvd. and Fanno Creek. $ 800,000
Add sidewalks, drainage and street lighting.
Regrade to improve sight distance.
B. DURHAM ROAD, between Hall Blvd. & Pacific Hwy. $2,200,000
Add turn lanes, sidewalks, drainage and street—
lighting. Regrade to reduce dips and improve
sight distance. Add signals at Hall intersection.
C. GAARDE STREET/PACIFIC HIGHWAY intersection. $ 850,000
Revise Gaarde St. to provide an improved approach
to Pacific Hwv. and a signalized intersection
with Pacific Hwy.
D. GREENBURG ROAD, between Pacific Hwy, and Cascada $1,200,000
BM. Ada urn lanes, sidewalks, drainxAim, street
lighting, and intersection improvements.
E. LOCUST STREET, between Hail Blvd. and Greenburg Rd. $ 450,000
Widen, add sidewalk Along south side, reduce sharp
curves.
F. MAIN STREET. Improve access and intersections. $ 700,000
G. McDONkLD STREET, between Hull Blvd. and 94th Ave. $1,100,000
Re�R� rade to reduce dips & improve sight distanee.
Add turn banes at intersections. Provide walkways
and drainegr..
11. WALNUT STREET', between Pacific Hwy. and 106th Avenue. $ 250,000
91 ewalk ijmprovementa; intersection improvements at
Grant Ave.
I. 69th AVENUE/PACIFIC HIGHWAY intersection. Revise $ 1.50,000
69th Avenue approaches to add turn lanes and to
improve the alignment of opposing Innes.
J. 121st AVENUE, between Scholls Ferry Road And $ 800,000
Burlheights Drive. Add turn lanes, sidewalks,
and street lighting.
(/ br/6189D
i _F
BIEN
EXHIBIT "A"
Following is a list of precinct numbers and polling places as provided by
Washington County Election Division. The official polling place may change
should the Electiun Division find it necessary to modify boundaries of the
precinct* in accordance with State law.
PRECINCT NUMBER POLLING PLACE
16 "+,` Metzger Elementary School, 10255 $W 90th, Tigard
30 \Tigard Community Center, 12495 SW Ash, Tigard
31 Ch rles F, Tigard School, 1.2905 SW Grant, Tigard
32 Charges F, Tigard School, 12905 SW Grant, Tigard
33 Fowler Jr. High 'School, 10065 SW Woalnut, Tigard
34 aamou Te lc►ton School, 9500 SW Murdock, `I�it3ard
35 Phil Lowiu School, 1261',) SW 71nd, Ti cArd
40 Twalit:y Jr. I it3h School, 14650 'SW 97th, Tigard
41 Summor•fit�ld A16Huuuo, imt)0 SW ,,wiumorriold Dr , , Tigard
46 Mary Woodward r..l ►ontary . c'hocll, 1232Fa SW Kothorino, Titl'►rd
100 ummorfiold Club tl uuo, 106!..,0 SW Summorfiold Dr. , ligard
194 Tigard Community (.on or, 12495 t;W Auh, l it3ard
19',► USA Durht+m Facility, 1 'a60 oW Hath, l igord
215 Cha►rlua r. Tigard Schoul 1291)5 SW Grant, TigAr•d
217 Metzger [.1omentary school, i02b!i SW 90th, 1 igr,rd
lw/6164D
r` Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 86—
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 88--1L--
A
8_ 1A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL CALLING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION TO
SU6NIT TO THE REGISTERED, QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE CITY A TRAFFIC SAFETY
IMPROVEMENT BOND MEASe;RE TO BE PAID THROUGH A 10—YEAR PROPERTY TAX LEVY.
WHF_REAS, the City Council has taken the position that voters of the City
should determine whether bonds should be issued to finance various traffic
safety improvements within the City of Tigard; and
W REAS, the City Council has identified the following areas within the City
to a improved within the next three years fr�in► the bond sale proceeds:
o nita Road, between Hall Boulevard and Fanno Creek
a Du am Road, between Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard
o Gaa e Street/Pacific Highway intersection
o Green rg Read, between Pacific Highway and Cascade Boulev�-ar•d
o Locust reet, between Greeriburg Road and Hall Boulevard
o Main Streacc.oaa and intersections
o McDonald SL eat, between 98th Avenue and Hall Boulevard
o Walnut Strou betweon Pacific Highway Arid the city lituits (near
106th Aveanuo)
o 69th Avenue Appr•oa ►oa to Pacific Hi;lhway
7o 1214it Avonuw, betwoo% scholia ("carry Rood arid Burlh►►ightx Drive
NOW, THEREFORE, FEC IT RESOL.VF by tho ligord City Council th►cat:
Section 1, An election is horn callod to bo hold in the City of Tiilard on
thea 8th day of Ne-veamber, 1900, otwoon the houru of 7:00 AM and 0:00 PM
Pacific Standard Ti.mo set tho pollir , pLacas dosiijnaatod in Exhibit "A" for tho
purposo of uubmitting to t-ho rot is Bred, caualified vote►ru of tho City of
Tigard tho proposition seat forth in flo ion 2 billow,
P� r'tion•Z, The following ballot title a d explanation Ju her•oby a pprowod and
the following meauura sh,41 bo prinLod ur n the official ballot as ueaL forth
below,
IINNrrIrNNrrNNrrNNrrNNrrNNNNrrNNNrr�tNNNNrirrrrrrlrrrNNrlrrNNrrNN rrrNNNrrNrrNNNdNrrNNNrlNrrrrrrrrNrlrrNNNNrrr;
CAPTION, 11GARD MAJOR STRE".LTS IRAFE`lC SAF Y IMPROVLMLNT BONO
QUC:SI IION: aHALL. I HE; C;TTY OF" I 1 CARD ("A:AA . NC RAL OBLIGAI ION BONDS F"OR
MAJOR STRL C:TS TRAF1"1.0 SAF"LrTY 1:MPROVE MTS UP TO $8,500,0007
EXPLANATION, Tigard citireann on the Tra►nuportatior Advioory Committee have
proposead a series of major utrcaot imp •ovomcants for the City.
Factors used to rate nood for those pro -ct# include: improvead
sa►foty, traffic Mow, and needed road rcp+a u,
The Committee proposed a General Obligation bond sale to fund
those projects. If passed, road projects wi bo built within
the next 3 years. The bonds will be paid t rough a 10—year
property tax levy. This brand sale will help an re that future
property owners help finances these projects.
NNNNNN#### #####NNNNNN#####R#############NNNNNNNNNNN##11## H####NNr 1###########
Page 1 �/
RESOLUTION NO. 88�-SGL.
Section-3 The City Recorder is hereby authorized and directed to certify in
the `•manner provided by law to the Elections Director of Washington County,
Oregon , the foregoing measure for inclusion as a part of the regular ballots
to berepared by such Director for voting at all precincts within the City of
(� Tigard\ as set forth in Exhibit "A" herein, at the General Election of
\ Novembe 8, 1988,
i
Section - The Tigard City RecorderA be, and s♦x is hereby authorized and
directed tundertake all necessary and convenient acts to facilitate the
inclusion o this measure on the November S. 1988 General Election ballot. fur
the approval or rejection of the qualified voters of the City of Tigard and is
further authu ized and direc.t.ed to give r►ut.ice �,f the above described election
and proposal publishing ot►ce in the Tigard Times on August 11, 1988 as t
required by ORS 250,275,
r
PASSED; '(hi day of 19aa,
ATTEST; Mayor City of Tigard
7
i
S
i
{
Deputy city Rocorder - Cii,� of Tigard "
APPROVED AS 10 FORM:
City kec.ord e r�".....,.._._.�.L.�,.. ,.
DAtQ
lw/6164D
Page 2 }
RESOLUTION NO. 88- €
f
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: August 6, 1966 DATE: SUBMITTED: August 1, 1966
ISSUEIAGENDA TITLE: PREVIOUS ACTION:
-� Annexation Fee Changes
PREPARED BY: Jill Monley
DEPT HEAD OK�Jfl ICITY ADMIN 0 REQUES11D BY:
POLICY ISSUE
Should an exception to our Planning Fee Schedule be made wherein on
annexations no fee would be char-god?
INFORMATION SUMMARY
It is logical that all the property within 'Tigard's "Area of Interest" become
a part cif Tigard at sonia point in the future. As a re:►ult, Council has
commissioned urban services studies in the two larc3e areas (Bull Mountain/
Walnut and Mot;v,3er) and dotern►ined that services can bo economically provided
as those residonts choose to juin the City, Since the benefit of annoxat:iun
is mutual (to the proporty owner and the city), it surms appropriate to alter
our Planning,) I oe Schodulo,
oil 3wly 21, wo discussed Alta.^ing our fuer schodule in order, to oncourdmlo
annoxdtion throughout our "Aroa of int:arc►st," but pdrticuldr ly in our .*ctive
plan arca, this would bu done by ,tlimir►r►tir►,3 the City procousing foo for' 4.+11
annoxatiuns within our aroa► of intoroiit, in addition to the City picking UP
tho Boundary Commission i'ee witt►in our ACt.1110 Phan dray. We wlso talk0d cabcaut
implementing this now policy on d 50 porc:ont rotrocictivo basis fear' those
onnoxations which occurrod in FY 07/0p,
Tho dttdchod revolution dm rids our, No schkadule to dc;cOmplish the Above.
„,,.
1 , Make no chonijo Arid continuo to alk tho proporty uwnpr(v) to pay both
the City procoNsing foo and Boundary Commivvion NO oxcopt in vary
large oloc:tion aroav,
2. Lliminato Ohre City processing foo within our, sroa► of interest and pick
up tho Boundary Commission fou for applicantu within our active plan
aroa.
3, Eliminate all focal for all applicants.
_.. .� _.... �,.�._��._......_....�.. W J:................. .�W ..W... .............,,., .. .....,W._,W_._...... W.._ ..W...
t”1'SCI1..__]MPACT
1, Alternative N1 above: No Impact,
2. Alternative tit above; $2,500/yr estimate (lost revenue and
fees paid to Boundary Commission),
3. Alternative N3 above: $3,500/yr estimate (lost revenue and
fees paid to Boundary Commission),
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends alternative 42 above as most suited to the City's objectives
of providing service over time to residents of our area of interest as a
result of annexation.
dc:62270
r�
1 a c0. mi LLI
01 a
a o l
,r
w
w
C3
LD
w N m� Utz 6n
L .+ N
w
a �
a
J
C;.
k! ►4
I i I I a I I i s 0 a a
�i fit' Q v
�3
00 N Nm
m 40 co
w45 � o $ $ c a c o o o % W
L6
Lu
low
cz
C
N N N A N N A N N Iw 00
OD
® 40 m l'4 CD W CO W OD � m
M M on N Ppd 1pd N N •�•� M Im
i i �. \ \ \ .30
c
O !" N N N N N N N N. N OD SOC 40
CD ao m m CD m aD 0 a .m oD 0* tlD
\ ♦ \ \ > \ \ ♦ I
U 1f! Il1 fl in co
.-� .� .� ••� O p '+ O N d C7
G a G1 6 G p p CJ G D G D O p
A'
Aj M LQ� ¢ L +
a
s,
H W slci G#
N 9 y Y y W
Lai
Rf C II� !D r+ V lzr •wtr
�+ W a vw y .4M
Cc Cf G7 > y t7 m 0 � 0 z 4.4 a� m "� 1- -� z O n
m m 0 ♦ r N
ZCD
qD D •••� N C LO CD M do ODeq fq 4r-
Z U T v C C C a t t r r r 7 3- Lo to ! tL V
¢ C] L. N N N N N 04 N N N N N (n L. N N 2 07 L7 '7
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Honorable Mayor- and City Council August 2, 1986
FROM: Loreen Wilson, Recorder�J�J
SUBJECT, Agenda Items 8 & 9
T'haua items will be delivered in your supplemental packet for the August 6th
meeting, This is scheduled to be delivered friday a venintj, August 5, 1988.
lw/G212D
E
i
f
DISCUSSION DRAFFI
MUNICIPAL SERVICES POLICY
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
GENERAL POLICY
The City of Tigard is the general purpose local government most responsible
for assuring that the Tigard community is adequately served now, and into the
future:, with needed municipal urban services. Further, through its community
land use planning responsibilities, the City is responsible for reviewing and
coordinating all the public facility and urban service plans, public and
private, affecting the community. The City meals theie3 municipal services
responsibilities by either directly providing the service or by coordinating
or contracting with other service providers,
o Direct Service Police, Library, Building, Planning,
(i,Q,, by City ompioyoas) , . , rnjineorinq, Public Works, Court, Records
Arid Adminiutrative Services. , ,
o Contract Sarvicas sowAgo lro.ytmont (by USA), C:.omputor Sarviceas,
(i ,a, , by others or, for 9 -1-1 Servjc,+)u (By 'IRrND), Diupatc:h Sorvivos
othoru) (for, KC;, TU, DU, Arid Sli), Police► Sarvicus
(or, KC: Arid [W), Library (for com, outuido
C ity), ;1Ro (with J'SU), PArka (fur USA),
lluildin.1 (for, KC:), +etc. . .
w Roijulstion or, I'vanchiaa C onditionu of Dovolopmont, 1-ucAl Improvomont,
` (i ,o. , roquir•:in+) or, Wulrirts, Nuiuvinco C.;odc►s, ridow,41k Mc-Aint.,
pormittiny others to *Acct at:c. . . And, raar,Wt3 ► C.olloction, Cables TV,
or opc+rAto) . . • Phonvu, r loctrdc", (4ib, otc, . .
y Voluntuor 1'4►ci1it�ttion Librory Voluntoars, Policia Rauorvov, Pa►rku
0 ,u,., othoru volunt.our or Volunt.opru, Community Sorvico Workvr•u, Senior
ogreea to do somothi.ng). . . C ont ur Volum tore, T iij+ird Arl,n and Gifts
Comm 4ttv0, Co or ;Irid iVicivaI
Donations. . ,
0 CoordimeAted ervicos Wtor Distric:tu, Iirea DJstrict u, U.G,A„
(i .o, , with caths►r• dirtoct t#*to ODOT, Iliclhw,,Ay% u►nd County Roads. , .
sorvico providc►rs) . . .
Whothor Ag a diroct, uarvicu pruvidor,, ret tin t►nablcer of vorvicot by othoru or,
in coordina►tiom with othirv, then City of T'igArd is rouponsiblo for, aeusuring
odoqur►ta ixad affardahlse municipal #orvicos to tho City of ligr►r•d upocifically
e nd totes TigArd community ganor•ally,
DIRECT SERVICES AND SERVICE LEVELS
The City of Tigard views itself as a basic service community. it is not our
intent to directly provide all municipal services. Nor is it out intent to
provide the community with the highest levels of service. Rather, it is our
policy to provide a high value of service for the resources provided. Tigard
provides a basic range and level of service in a highly productive and
efficient manner with the stated objective of keeping Tigard's taxes among the
lowest in the State for comparable functions and cities.
CONTRACT SERVICES
The City may choose to subcontract its work to either private sector vendors
or with the government agencies. Subcontracting may occur for a variety of
reasons, if.
0 1he City lacks in—house oxpertiso,
o The task or project is shurtr-corm in naturo Arid tho City wishes to dvuid o
hire/fire cycle;
0 the City lacks adeacl►,►«to vopitsal or oquipmorit to officio. Ily or offectivcly
porfurm the tauk;
0 1ho City l�►bor coutu wry a+bovo tho maerkvt norm for thea task;
o Thea City wishoa to introduce in-•huuoo ce;,mputttivo bideii►►rg pra;►uuroo vorsuu
outuide vondura;
o Or, the City fir►dt► it, othorwiuo in itu intvresat to do uo.
Juut ws thea c:Ly miliht choo#o to vubcuntrocL work to othors, public or,
priva►to, tho City olue► ha►s no objo tion to competin;q and biddinvg to provide
controc:t work i.0 othwru, but tiunora►lly only to othor jovOrriffiOnt-Al AgOnci011.
The City may ehooso tea provide cont.roct tsurv400 for, a vaeriuty of rc+a►uono, if,
* Additional eontritct work aaloiq v,ith baole CRY work n►a►ked they unit test of
basic City work 1000 costly of more offivirr►t ;
o As a ourvica to another fgovurnment:Sal roc►ncy, w<a ca►n lowyr thcair mets by
sharing our lower coutu to proximity or ocunom.y of oca►lu;
o By cooparating with other tgovornmer►ts wo cyan rAivo City sarvico lavols
without increaesir►g coot%;
o Or, the City finds it othorwioo in its intur-ast to do to,
Thera are, thareforo, threat types of City contract sQrvic@t,
1, City Work Subcontr:-act — whore the City contracts with another to do work
or services for thea City (i .e. , Computer Service Bureau, tngirivor
Overhaul, Legal Services, Capital Construction, Janitorial Services, etc.);
2. Intergovernmental Cooperative Service Agreement — where the City joins
with other governmental agencies to jointly provide a► City servicer (9-1--1,
Dispatch, WCCLS, USA, MACC, and Cable TC, etc.);
3. City Contract Service (SRO, Police Patrol, Parks Maintenance, Street
Sanding, Building Inspection, etc.)
Subcontracts - State Law and City Purchasing Rules govern the process for
subcontracting, bidding, and award. Generally, the City is required to award
the contract to the lowest bidder, although some exemptions apply, such as
those for architect, engineering, computer, services, and some sole source
bids. The cost of bid preparation, contract administration, and close--out
should be considered when comparing to an in-house bid. Also, low bids
intended to undercut competition short-term and then skyrocket prices later
when there is no in-house or other competition should be avoided, such as
though the use of lunger term contracts or performance penalities.
InteESovernmental Cooperative Service Agreements - These contracts are
identified by the intergovernmental agreement between the various governing
boards, often a central boardss, often a central administration with shared
costs to the members, and under situations whoro pooling reduces the cost of
4aparate action or improves sorvico beyond individual action.
Undor Inter gowornmental Cooperativo Sorvic Q Atireomants, the City is interoutod
in provided servicou to the coop at its costs or in payin�3 for, cervices at a
pro-rata direct cost,
Ccintrac�t;� Servicou .- Those c:ontrtictu oro moot often two-wdy, botweon tho City
;rift ono uthor, oithor portion or ori3:knlration, Thu City iu ufforlrq to provide
a uurvico, but is not a party to on a;lrvomont per ae, Iho
City, thuroforo, is inturoutod in providiii-j !3orvicuu by Contract only upon
recovory of all direct costa, indirect vostu, And -somo omour►t of profit As not
{{
for oath contrAct by Council ,
4.
o;)[GI A[.. III S'I NI t I COOR'UI NA11 UN
The city is suppurtivo of tho tiro and Wat.or Nut.ric:t.0 uorvin'a tho community,
Thu City its, howuvor, c:omornod that, they are planning long- term ou well do
short-toren ft.)r tIio emloqua►t.e provision of +kffordAbIo #urvic:wu, profora.bly on A
basic §vrvice lovcl bast #,
Tho City oupporto efforts of tho I tato Diutrictn to conoolidatp torvi.coo And
move their tax rater uvor, tho noxt throo yo,trs to tho $2,00 " $2.2U/thouuand
tax rate lovel. Assuming tho Districts cran maintain me+rvice leavels and hold
tax raattrs In that reango as ut;►tod by tho District's Administrator, than tho
City should riot dovolop the City Vire Uepe►rtment option, ]f uurvicos doclino
or couts stay abovo tho $2..20 roto, then City +should presont ea city firer
Department alt@rnotive, as hovo all ether C:iticas in the 5toto our sizo,
Waiter supply is a major concorn. Tho City should dovolop a joint agreement
betwoon the Tigard Waster Uiutrict, the Met,-gor Water Oistrict and the City a%
to the long-term waiter supply stra►togy ror the community, Pa►iling such an
ai►grt'ement, tho City should exploro a City Wa►tor Commission or 0op<ortment
altorna►t:ivo.
ko/C3rlt1
IF
FAREWELL REMARKS-MY OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK BACK, PUT ONLY AS RELATES TO
ISSUES AHEAD...MY OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON MY VIEW OF THE ISSUES AHEAD...I
WILL BE BRIEF AND DIRECT, SINCE MY REMARKS ARE MY PERSONAL VIEWS AND NOT
THAT OF A DETAILED OR DOCUMENTED STAFF REPORT...
WHEN HIRED IN 1581 BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, IT WAS CLEAR THAT I WAS TO
SERVE THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY, NOT JUST RUN THE CITYtS DAY TO DAY OPERATIONS...
CLEARLY TIGARD WAS A COMMUNITY FACING GROWTH AND CHANGE.. .EVEN IN THE
RECESSION YEARS, 1581 & 1902, TIGARD ISSUED OVER 200 RESIDENTIAL PERMITS. ..
OUR LOCATION, 217/1-5 $, SUNSET I-5 CORRIDOR MEANT WE WOULD GROW AND
CHANGE. ..MANAGING GROWTH AND ENHANCING COMMUNITY LIVABILITY HAS DE'EN AND
REMAINS THE COMMUNITY GOAL...
MOVING THE CITY FROM A REACTIVE, RESPUNSIVC MODE INTO A PROACTIVE,
FACILITATIVE MODE HAS OCCUPIED MUCH OF MY TIME THESE LAST 7 YEARS.. .GETTING
AHEAD OF THE GROWTH CURVE •- FINANCIALLY AND ORGANIZATIONALLY s- HAS ALLOWED
THE CITY COUNCIL TO LOOK AHEAD AND PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITYtS FUTURE, RATHER
T11AN SHOW UP AT COUNCIL TO FIGHT OVER THE LATEST SURPRISE EVENT.. .TIGARD HAS
MOVED FROM A NICE SMALL, TOWN INTO ITS ROLE AS ONE OF OREGONtS NICEST 8UT
MAJOR CITIES. ..
t
SPECIFICALLY, I AM PROUD TO HAVE HELPED WITH SOME MAJOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS: STRATEGIC GROWTH MANAGEMENT...
a COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT -- 5,000-12,000 HOURS...INTERGOVERNMENTAL
a FINANCE -- 5 YEAR PLAN AND TAX BASE, LOWEST TAX RATES...
(NOTE: FY 1987-88 5.6% OR $382,000 UNDEREXPENDED...$1.3 MILLION RESERVE)
o COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -- TRULY CITY-WIDE...4 DRAWER FILE. CABINET INTO RING
BINDER...
CIVIC CENTER -- ABILITY PHASE EXPANSIONS OUT OF CASH WITHOUT NEW
TAXES...
a METZGERIWASHINGTON SOUARE -- LONG-TERM FINANCIAL STABILITY
CCIMPPRATORS=
o ABOUT 14,000 TO ALMOST 28,000 IN 7 YEARS. ..UP 90% IN END OF FY 198E9-B9
(, SHOULD BE OREGON'S 10TH LARGEST CITY. ..
o STAFF FROM 82 TO 153, UP 06%.. .JUST UNDER COMMUNITY'S GROWTH RATE...BUT
STAFF MIX SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGED TOWARDS SERVICE EMPHASIS WITH MORE
POLICE OFFICERS PER CAPITA AND CITY ADMINISTRATION DOWN FROM OX TO 2% OF
OPERATING BUDGET. ..
D ASSESSED VALUE FROM $477 MILLION 10 $1.3 MILLION, UP 299x!
o TIGARD TODAY IS M1 IN OREGON IN FISCAL CAPACITY, IN ASSESSED VALUE PER
CAPITA, WHICH MEANS WE CAN RAISE NECESSARY PUBLIC FUNDS AT THE LEAST
COST OF ANY CITY IN OREGON...
C
CITY ISSUES AHEAD: COUNCIL ACTION PLAN...
l
1. TRANSPORTATION & STREETS...CANNOT RELY ON OTHERS FOR $.. .
2. PARKS...LAND...EVENTUALLY RECREATION TOO..- C
3. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT...NALL EMPHASIS, HEART & SOUL.. .
4. MAINTAIN FINANCIAL POSITION...BUDGET CONTROL, TAX BASE, STRATEGIC
INVESTMENTS OF CURRENT X TO SAVE EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE FUTURE $.,.BIGGEST
DANGER FOR A CITY IS TO SAVE $ SHORT-TERM BY AVOIDING OR DEFERRING COSTS
INTO THE FUTURE...
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES...STREAMLINING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGY
COMMUNITY ISSUES SNOT JUST THE CITY'S):
1. ANNEXATION AND AFFORDABLE MUNICIPAL SERVICES (I.E. BEST THING FOR BOTH
15 FOR BULL MOUNTAIN TO ANNEX AS FAST AB POSSIBLE INTO TIGARD.. .TIF
FOR BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD, PARKS SDC $, LONG-TERM PLANNING...
+. FIRE SERVICES SUPPORT MOVE TO $2.20 THOUSAND NEXT YEAR. .. IF NOT, THEN
CITY SHOULD EVALUATE WITHDRAWING, PROVIDING FIRE SERVICES DIRECTLY AND
LOWERING TAXES ABOUT $I/THOUSAND BELOW CURRENT RATES, AS HAVE ALL OTHER
CITIES IN THE STATE OUR SIZE:. ..
G. WATER SUPPLY •- CITY COUNCIL, fiIGARD WATER DOARD AND MErTZGER WATCR BOARD
SHOULD COMMISSION A JOINT TASK FORCE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEVELOPING A
COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN TO THEN BE ADOPTED BY JOINT
RESOLUTION...T14E CITY COUNCIL SHOULD ALSO BE IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE
LAKD OSWEGO COUNCIL REGARDING THEIR WATER EXPANSION PLANS...TIGARD IS
THE: ONLY MAJOR CITY IN OREGON WITHOUT WATER RIGHTS TO MEET CURRENT
NEEDS, LET ALONE: FUTURE DEMAND...FAILING THAT, THE COUNCIL SHOULD
CONSIDER WITHDRAWAL FROM ONE OR BOTH DISTRICTS AND THE DIRECT PROVISION
OF WATER TO THE COMMUNITY...
I AM TRULY PROUD AND PRIVILEGED TO HAVE BEEN A PART OF THE CITY OF TIGARD
AND THE GREATER TIGARD COMMUNITY THESE PAST 7 CHALLENGING AND EXCITING
YEARS.—THROUGH MY MANY FRIENDS, TIGARD WILL ALWAYS REMAIN A PART OF ME—I
AM SURE THAT TIGARD'S FUTURE WILL BE EVEN BETTER STILL FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP
AS A COUNCIL AND THE COMMUNITY'S CONTINUED INVOLVEMENT. THANK YOU.
is
moL— . ����✓ — LJV
'1
! f I
P r6 C1
j'I1�. _�
)#jfmiii t
n1P. j' t�
__ � � 1_—'�' J 1 �� s f7�ir(ita�ii+ar��IRiTR.sT*�iii�eFi'iio�ril ��+lei�t�itl1j°�R1�1�i'P�t�t►t"` } ,,
NOTE: If THIS pICROFILIED -i i-. 4ftk AM
DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN ' - - - .. _ __--___.__- Z
THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY
Y OF THE ORIGINAL
AM
APIM
os sz az cz vz sz-ei -ez zzia oz sr si�I gl srT 51 si -ze at of s _a_ -1-_-g--S___.�---e- ..Z .
'auCiuelRulaulrue�uuAw�
--—
CH-1 _
M —
7 7
� i
PF
i
' 41
r
' ,Mr«�`.'�13'�` Y ''!'��'`f# t,�d..�,•. _� mit. ✓y�� Z �6/ t - r� ,y3& /F .
- 'b{' "gam. _• °.<_.��.,� ��- `i �
ir. t"'.• ' per...._ -. t-.
�.il�.►#i�`s"" �`` rr _-' i¢�i{t' .�65•.✓ � ti
r �1: jv aci a►1 s r:a+ rs•�#� t as t:3 •
• #•aT#.►�s�Vlat}►r✓`i-sii`� +• • mss"* s sal# f,� T; -
�•a.#ri+.♦a.#�iarii-aTi•• :•i��atasisrii 3•- ��� �•;
iii►s�siss s+iir�'rriO#sisrii. � isa'sriii�:#s►si.�1�`+ f. SY e
i ;i l l#iii a to rir s l i itis i t s i i iia �' f
s"!�`s"sf+is#issiiisi asilri•'sai•i+is ♦rr,•#lis.�sr+#as,►siri-s s• i ra`i ry -. - _-:;•_
ss ilii++i�.lri♦l �lia•rrii i ilii• • •i �fi i �� � .•#ii+1 ii+;iriii }�i+iiiit#•iiii�si#;'/ ii+•+ia"i+ilii#i~�~�
s s r♦l.►♦r aria.•r aril ats i ata s>a►..s.za,�rs+stssoaa?as+► dry �- 'x�j'�-�e_ �r� -
i.+►l•♦##•+r.t•##l# • ♦• • �#.6,1„11♦i♦ + +F" `a � - __ 'f
irr+siiiiii'1aiiiiai is s♦+ i♦CSNil - •• • .x_,�,• ��" �' i s��'�` �`� x
#ail i r ar'y,►'�iii#i'�' iss� •s '-
�`•�M+Rii i i s i i s l i r+►i ia1#r##• r _ r 4 ►,._ f •( �. F
•+#+i• ►i#1•i l i r i
#irs#iiiii~iiiii®s•si~iiMi�ii�sii•ii•;i�. -
a i i•i►i•i i i i l i i i i i••
r i,,,�.1!#f ♦moi r•r#+►l# ♦#ri '. ,?r J&N
� _i ♦� ,iYwi• lyi.♦�♦i��if�f, ',��• aY.. ?q^"-_f:.../"ve-� �C�+t� .: a'
• a ►i i i ii•isii►i"►+►sia'i r -s ••
a-i••..♦_i,►wii+ .l#a:Yslila,•i�i a"i l r l#l#♦♦ •wi ar'r'T � '`S_ - •Y'f+#i.
•mai iii`ice►iiiiii•'1►ii ii•#i.►iiiii'►'iiia r.►i._�!'7. 'f'.� F 7-r� +'Y -
♦ • ,ra l /l•►iris # iii rill iii
►+ • :�r r �c #•r♦•►li ,oil• l•Airlla"`-s �"
♦i1a w ►♦ Cl► ill #•#♦i `^.' ': � .�
ii Ali .• •>liilli i-i i♦-i�i�i l l� l l l i - y'[••� -}
a•l�l�iil• ►iliaa si♦i` iii• aF�,�^: "{'�4R -y,.r 'eft
Yiilliliil••llilil+►•if►lsi#li.►.►il
''Y►_►it�i#•..#rii#i�l#ii+i�il+lrillii+_ii�lni_llii+_iililt_iiii+•.i♦i ii-••►►►ilii liil#i i♦l ii l••►►l Olia_��i►♦l�••fil lllrlil-?*50W iiill�
l♦ ;• • lir.i•liil�i
r#lii�iirli-
ili�ii•
00
. ..0
S_W.O,Lp'�L/•
f�.•. � t ti'
•ii•♦li iii••
`. s • !ilrlillllii.,ill+irililriirliiliiiliiriiilli� - •. �4E` � 13��
V ►iiiiiii i Iii♦ii♦♦♦i♦♦♦ii+ alv ..•t- [K
i l l l i l i
lr r i i i l i i#• a : p
►aiiiiill•4 it li �lillii♦i< i'�
C.t•.►iii•lii••ill �
••►♦il Bili- ♦ilii♦ii4,' • �hr _ .
►:i•:r♦ii iii ri i�iiriili♦ - ':
• aim aiiiliilaliiaillia�ialiillii,►iisli ♦y
♦i i i i i i l i i i a i i i i l i• .. ��
►♦iiiiliirii• ♦Ilii +tI �- _
►illiiiililliiililiriiil�ililllilia'��•./ 7 `�'' .."'•'`d� 1
-iillliii#iil� illi ..� r � _ r� eY.�iB....� '• ,
►i iiiiliilllil>li• Z 7 a
►iiliiiiOriiiil0•iiiiii!:4iii •: _
►ii••raaaaa,•iyrira�-viii Si .�: ii"�� �~ �,� '�� � `� .,�
►•lira►lili•_iaii��":r :� «�. � r..z-o'�.6.d^tbcc4�".^'.'0ox. ,��-'..,..:..' Y``
►liiii.wi i _ -
•
RLE W'�"`.. •_�. � ,
-:. u u UU LLU LUWU uuuuuuuuuauuutfuuumumumuuumuuuu
- .:.
- y
s i
1 0,
IT II
i i f v
r'
";�i.J>»v�s/i%'s'.+JL/N.:i.✓l'':jf� .h•.+i lv rfV • i � F_��
x4 0
-
Y
�F 1.
"1eiC•YY.Mm
t }
f j tilt �. fan
1 Y
�E4l1f a
r { r
Nang
5
pr
> r l �sl of
r " >c arc. 4' mac, rz,
I:Q�C�Cro•:f�. t �{L� syr X � r�:'
--- Y•EYJI.+Iti.`w r A~.1.n 1. ,�`' ' f?tom a'�
Att•0
CZ
- - S Irl ♦ t E -
all,
Pit
-
;,.
a
-
r _
T�.vr -z7/
;Wy-y r-----'-
' qtr i r��i �l''xr'}`•t-.�". ,•��'-t' j.�,.�--w.� r— ,"J� sr r' .
•+Y
y� Y,Q,Y4 4
Y 4
Y M Yy v�
f
M1� f •rs
e Y .
1
tiL J
En
lliE ��w � Frei [■. � �� •Z•.
I lltL
} -
i!. ■! i it
man an
x:. _ _a■■� �1 rJ !a�Wr�. If•G S.{. `(�+p, f f ,y >Jt
ISRZ
loll
� �i� �� ���� ■��� � � ^� It -s� ��`
iii r - ♦ z�+c��•w� L aa--;
.l
;as w
• ■
/.` •
s
7 T
-- !,r
!s�°r11/"f r� / }rydrJf JJ ✓'. Jif % .t.:,oa• t#ii .`f5;/' -e if •^/ - —
MIMIN
f�
�. 'f,fr3/�f 1 ✓ '' f it �.,g } � 1��� vi rte. -
W:-.. -_ice ..,... f
::. MOR
mvo
rs*i,5/}!fit's'
`' j�--- SII �► �� iM�Hl�i f r
-� j i���E�� '1E � � iJi�i■i J � �fi
4 sS # w it
not
aSS � ��+ ` •� i ��'t Y vtl=--'s�l��-� �� .F� .F f�,�hE��a��.`�v` `a',�.t._5'r �y,�`�..:�i. ' - ..
r ��i■ ♦ 4 •yrs. � iY?'{ - i ry A.'---s- f;
Bass[ ♦ F �Iltf'�1 ¢ems aim
F fsr' � a i�l�� IrY-r:,,+► Lam. j ��:.,..t -
lisp
NEI
0 =own
REEMERM IN LEE I MEMO' M1.2 L111121:10-1.0
77� 77.7771T
_
x
t- ,%...AFI . •.. �.• ® t ���.�
\�`y. u��♦i♦��i0♦iii�\ , `'1'' � a ;,,° ' •,,�,
go
•
.. .. .r: -....
_ •_ ir`i>f>. .%>."i/ �>. SM
> „ 3'f ,. > mfr, .-r,• f' - u .
L,�- =.. ','✓ r r�jr- iT J. r� ;,> rr :_ r r r f r
r' m>r+}r r, y / 5 ire
p � f rJr
�<rxa Frnf� rr ri cru '` f � f rS�
`h3� .>>'r.+>'�'y'�'r}'� r-' ,;✓���>'rr' � / ����•,'�", ?'_,+�k � '�>rir r>�+ �"1� fr'r /r
� � ;yr�r r t rr
f �r r
71,
ss
Mill
>
�,rc, ,� tx
jr sf , •+ ..4 r` ' -.tet 'a `
.y.'e u � �lff>� r r✓�fr'r;'r"�vstf/ -� '' �r
.+f arm+r r
r �� W,
MK
Los NO
ff
BE
�..:y,- i `�y'y»v f ;�-s i,Sr�` r r H •s .sr
� fEti r��� y ■ � ... ylr S--�'�r�j'sfy--..s.,��� -� r`' �
!.
an
an I
■an
■ ,.
��►r �#
fir ii
iL #1 ■.a. ■■ ar xr s E
�' 11 i�;�y#moi}f w i ��x.:: c 'tf^"? �;�rrr✓of
man �,� ,�;:���� .`�. � Say :x ft
um
�• ♦• �■'
llr�ll
•' �f 11�, .� 4y �....... Eats
+++��C�CCbbbbbbbbbbbC88bbbLLL 5558W8W8WCCCiii �H'�fy !!t _
ii
z,
- _ t