Loading...
City Council Packet - 11/02/1987 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA - CATV sign-up sheet(s) . If no sheet is available, NOVEMBER 2, 1987, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or .less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 6:30 o STUDY SESSION - Agenda discussion and Council miscellaneous 7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING: 1. 1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1 .2 Pledge of Allegiance 1 .3 Call To Staff and Council For Non--Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or, Less Per Issue, Please) 3 . PRESENTATION OF KEYS TO THE CITY o Mayor Brian A. CIVIL. AIR PATROL EMERGENCY SERVICE COORDINATION PRE..SENTATION o Deputy Commander Vaughn Thompson 5. PUBLIC HEARING - TEMPORARY USE - EU 10--86 -- KEY BANK OE' OREGON - NPOH5 Request - a one-year extension to use a mobile home office trailer on property zoned CP (Commercial Professional) . LOCATION: 7150 SW Sandburg Road (WCTM 2S1 1DC, Lots 3800 and 3900) 4� o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Community Development; Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Community Development Staf o Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council - Resolution No. 87- 6. PUBLIC HEARING -_. COMPREHE:NSIVE: PLAN AMENDMENT" & ZONE_ CHANGE: - CPA 87-•-06 & ZC 87-2.0 - MARGERY KRUEGER - NPO 117 Request for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Band 'Zone Change for a 5 acre parcel from C-N (Neighborhood Commerical) to R-25 (Medium High Density Residential, 2.5 units, acre) and a second Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change request- to change 15 acres of land from R-25 to C-G (General Commercial) . LOCATION: East side of New Scholls Ferry Road along the north and south side of the proposed Murray Blvd. Extension (WCTM 2S1 AB lot 101) o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Community Development: Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Community Development Staff o Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council - Resolution No. 87-__ COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 2, 1987 - PAGE 1 7. PUBLIC HEARING — COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONE CHANGE — CPA 87-07 nW & ZC 67--21 — CITIZEN SAVINGS & LOAN — NPO #7 Request for approval of a Comprehensive Plan AmendirenL on 43.2b acres from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and a Zone Change request from R-45 (PD)(Low Density Residential, 4.5 units/acre planned development. to R-7 (PD) (Medium Density Residential, 7 units per acre planned development. LOCATION: South of Summer Lake Park, east of 130t:h Avenue. (WCTM 1S1 33DD lot 100) o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Community Development Staff o Council Questions Or Commeril:s RM o Public Hearing Closod o Consideration By Counc.i.l. -- Ordinance No. 67- ifflu RECESS COUNCIL. MEETING CONVENE LOCAL. CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD Mt:11.I1MG 8. 1OCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD (t_CRB) MEETING 8. 1 Call to order and roil call 8.2 LCRB rule .intent: clarification Ordinance No. 87--____-_- 8.3 Recess LCRB meeting RE=CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MLETING 9. CONSEN'1 AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be p oncacted in one motion without separ,aLe discussion. Anyone may roquesL that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 9. 1 Approve Council minutes -- October 8, 1987 9.2 Receive and file Council meeting calendar update 9. 3 Receive and file reports a. Streetlight Policy Report b. Washington County Road Study Report — Durham Road c. Tigard/Tualatin Bridge Report 9.4 Recess Council. meeting; reconvene LCRB meeting; approve annual liability insurance renewal; adjourn LCRB meeting; reconvene Council meeting. 9.5 Approve training request — City Engineer 10. NON—AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 12. ADJOURNMENT lw/1505D l COUNCIL AGENDA — NOVEMBER 2, 1987 — PAGE 2 i f lam , ) T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 2, 1987 - 6:30 P.M. 1 . ROLL. CALL: Present: Mayor Tom Brian; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Edwards, and John Schwartz; City Staff: Jill Monley, Acting City Administrator/Community Services Director; Keith Liden, Senior Planner (arriving at 6:56 PM); Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, City Recorder; Randy Wooley, City Engineer (arriving at 6:56 PM) . 2. STUDY SESSION - Agenda discussion and Council miscellaneous a. Mayor Brian and Acting City Administrator reviewed agenda issues for the evenings meeting. Direction from Council was as follows. b. Word processing position authorization and centralized dictation request. Acting Administrator is to call Councilor Johnson and discuss her concerns r•egar•ding this issue and then reschedule for a future Council meeting. C. Buhler• Terrace Subdivision, file fl`3- 886. Council consensus was to pull this up for• review after• diseut;sion under non--agonda items during the rt?qubar• meetiny. d. Acting Admi.nistr•ator advised Council that staff had boon contacted with an information request for urban service provision on 132nd (r Avenue. Council briefly discussed the impact of the possible annexation in that area on the Transportation Plan. RECESS - City Council Meeting - 6:54 PM SENIOR PLANNER LIDEN AND CITY ENGINEER ARRIVED: 6:56 PM 3 . EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 6:54 PM under• the provisions of ORS 192 .660 (1) (d) , (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real pr•oper•ty transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. RECESS: 7:20 PM RECONVENE: 7:32 PM 4. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. Councilor Eadon requested the addition of the Butler Terrace Subdivision discussion to be non-agenda as Item . 1. Agenda Item 8(a) was requested to be added to the agenda for consideration regarding the Civil Forfeitures Ordinance. Consensus of Council was to authorize this modification to the agenda. Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 2, 1987 5. VISITOR'S AGENDA a. No one appeared to speak. 6, PRESENTATION OF KEYS TO THE CITY a. Mayor Brian presented the following keys of recognition to citizens who had served on a board or committee. Mike Misovetz, Utility and Franchise Committee Chairperson; Fred Benz, Utility and Franchise Committee Member; Teri Kaliher, Park Board; Chris Vander-wood, Planning Commission; and Robert Odell, Park Board. 7. CIVIL AIR PATROL EMERGENCY SERVICE COORDINATION PRESEN'FATION a. Mayor Brian noted that Deputy Commander Vaughn Thompson id not appear. Mayor Brian encouraged the Civil Air Patrol to work with the Chief of Police to coordinate emergency services. RECESS COUNCIL MEETING -- 7:37 PM CONVENE LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING 7:37 PM 8. LOCAL CONTRACT RE.VIFW BOARD (L..CRB) MEE::TI:NG a. ROIL CALL.: Present: Board Chairman 'Tom Brian; Board Members: , Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Edwards, arid John Schwartz; City Staff: Jill Monley, Acting City Administrator/Community Services Director; Keith Liden, Senior Planner; Bill Manahan, Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and L.oroo n Wilson, City Recorder; Randy Wooley, City E::ngi.nvo r. b. Acting City Administrator advised Council that an Ordinance had been prepared for- their, consideration. She rioted thjat staff had i discovered through the modification update process that the procedural rules for the L.CRB had some language inadver•Lently omitted from three different sections. Upon review of the formal Council record, it was clear that the Board's intent was to adopt a the language that had been omitted. ;,he recommended approval of the Ordinance. + C. ORDINANCE NO. 87-59 AN ORDINANCE:. REPEALING ORDINANCE: N0. 85-06 AND ADOPTING RUL.ES+OF T14E CITY OF TIGARD LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD FOR THE AWARDING OF PUBLIC CONTRACTS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. d. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. RECESS LCRB MEETING & RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING — 7:39 PM 9. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 9. 1 Approve Council minutes — October 8, 1987 Page 2 — COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 2, 1987 ........... • 9,2 Receive and file Council meeting calendar' update 9.3 Receive and file reports Rort a. Streetlight Policy RReReport Study Report - Durham Road b, Washington County Tualatin BridgeRo reeonvene l_('RB rt meeting; approve annual C. Tigard/ 9,q Recess Council meeting; ,> reconvene liability insurance renewal; adjourn LCRB meeting; Council meeting. _ fit Engineer 9.5 Approve training request Y to a, Motion by Councilor Schwar'tl, seconded by Councilor Edwards, approve, unanimous vote of Council present. Approved by _ NPOfiS 10. PUBLIC {SEARING TERM MPORARY EMPORARY USE -- TU 10-86 - KEY BANK OF OREGON , ear extension to use a mobile hOmloAI LOCATION:ice trailer or, Request for acne-y property zoned CP (Commercial Professional . (WCTM 201 1DC, Lots 3800 and 3900) Him Sandberg Street a, Public IA(aaring opened. Cit. Council. b, No declarations ur• challenges by y use appruvtal for, C. Community Development Director al tof�'dthc Mi<t mpor.ar,yc Wk> ,tern> C;ivk sod Oregon had applied for a rer > year. {{t- - a mobile oi'fice trailer for an extension of unc. y Council theAt the proposal W" idi'railr'- locattion`was depine c "n `' t"— year ago except that a corr(-cted d , Public Testimony Pr•opononts Blink of Oregon, adv i sed difying their home o Mr. Ned Takasrecess of mo mt ui., Vice President of Key af or the Council that the bank was in the p of office process and would havenneed He for-reqk c��•<'t trailer pr•oval of the expiration of a one year extension. application. meet Director' recommended -approval of a one year e. Community Develop use to expire November 17, 1988 ' extension fora temporary f, Public Hearing closed. FOR g• RESOLUTION NO. 87_ =13�► A FINAL BYORDER PACIFIC{{WEST RNR BANK, TFILE RNOY USE APPROVAL RENEWAL REQUESTED TU 10-86 APPROVING THE ADPL ICOA�s AN SUBJECT TU CERTAIN CONDITION ' ENTERING FINDINGS AND CON h- Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of C,uncil present. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 2, 1987 11 . PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONE CHANGE - CPA 87-06 & ZC 87-20 - MARGERY KRUEGER - NPO H7 Request for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change fur a 5 acre parcel from C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-2.5 (Medium High Density Residential, 25 units/acre) and a second Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change request to change 15 acres of land from R-25 to C-G (General Commercial) . LOCATION: East side of New Scholls Ferry Road along the north and south side of the proposed Murray Blvd. Extension (WCTM 2S1 4B, Lot 101) a. Public Hearing opened. b. No declarations or challenges were filed. C. Keith Liden, Senior Planner, highlighted the recommendation received and noted that the Planning Commission reviewed the application October 6, 1987, and recommended denial. Senior- Planner Liden further stated that the proposal was a request for single family residential with 5,000 square foot lot minimums and that staff had recommended approval . d. Public Testimony Proponents o Russell A. Krueger, 1335 SW 66th Ave. , Portland, OR 97225, Mr. Krueger requested approval of the application stating there was more need for commercial use in the NW area of Tigard now and as it continues to develop. He further stated that he understood some of the concerns addressed by the Planning Commission and would riot request a zone change at this point if he would be allowed to change the location of the existing Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning from the north side of the proposed Murray extension to the south side of the extension. Opponents o Mr. Russel Head, 11689 SW Wilton Ave. , presented a petition containing 77 signatures opposing the proposed CG zone change. He also identified needs in t;he future and concerns about the growth in the area. Mr. Head continued to address the different LCDC goals noting his concern that- the zone change did riot comply with state goals 1, 2., 7, and 8. Mr. Head advised Council that the Washington County Planner, Brent Curtis, rioted transportation impact concerns which were shared by the neighborhood. Mr. Head felt that he could support Mr. Krueger's suggestion of moving the existing CN zone to the south side of Murray Boulevard, however, could not support the zone change to CG. o Mr. Roger Noar, 11766 SW Swendon Loop, stated that he generally opposed the application that had been reviewed by the Planning Commission but could support the move of the existing CN zone to the south side of Murray Boulevard. o Mr. Daniel G. Morgan, 11712 SW Swendon Loop, opposed the application and stated that no more shopping centers were needed in that area. Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 2, 1987 o Mr. Bill Brown, 13665 SW Ashbury, stated that he opposed the project but also opposed the relocation of the existing CN zone t� designation to the south side of Murray Boulevard. He advised Council that his opposition to the relocation of the existing zoning was based on the safety of children having to cross Murray Boulevard in order• to reach the convenience store proposed. He requested that the CN zoning be left where it currently exists on the north side of the proposed Murray Boulevard extension. e. Council and staff- discussed the appropriate way to consider• Mr. Krueger' s suggestion of the relocation of the CN zoning in the area. Legal Counsel recommended that Council treat it as a separate application. Community Development Director advised Council that staff had riot- reviewed the relocation of the CN zone and would like to have an opportunity to review that along with RM taking that request through the Planning Commission process. ON us f. Public Hearing closed. g. After lengthy discussion, Council consensus was to take specific action on the application before them and to encourage Mr. Krueger to reapply for the relocation of the existing CN zoning, h. RESOLUTION NO. 87-135 A RESOLUTION ADOPT LNG FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 10 DENY A COMPREHEN:'JVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 87-06 AND ZONE CHANGE 7C 87-20 PROPOSED BY MARGERY KRUEGER. i . Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor• Eadon, to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. j . Mayor Brian stated that he felt that the application as proposed was was fatally flawed and would create housing density offset problems City-tiiide. Fie further stated that this would not be a good policy for the City . Mayor Brian advised that the proposed relocation of the existing CN zone was different enough in its intent, that it should go through a separate application procoss. 12. PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONE CHANGE - CPA 87-07 & 7_C 87-21 - CITIZEN SAVINGS & LOAN -- NPO N7 a. Mayor Brian advised the applicant had withdrawn his request and there would be no public hearing. 13. ORDINANCE NO. 87-60 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR CIVIL FORFEITURE OF INSTRUMENTALITIES AND PROCEEDS OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY TERMINATING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT, SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. a. Acting Administrator advised the ordinance was modified with the termination procedure of the intergovernmental agreement with Washington County being further defined. b. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 2, 1987 i � R 14. NON—AGENDA ITEMS 14 . 1 BUTLER TERRACE SUBDIVISION DISCUSSION a. Community Development Director synopsized the history of the application and -advised that Councilor Eadon had expressed concern with the firial decision by Planning Commission. He advised that the appeal filing deadline was November 3, 1987 at 4:30 PM. rm b. Councilor Eadon expressed concern with the increase of possible pedestrian risk in the area rioting the grade school and the number of children using this area. C. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to pull the item up for Council review. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. present. d. Mayor Brian directed staff to schedule the public hearing as soon as possible. 15. ADJOURNMENT 8:48 PM Approved by the Tigard City Council on December 7, 1987. . �_� _ City Recorder City of Tigard ATTEST: 7/'7- '7 - Mayor — City of Tigard LW/192.9D M Page 6 — COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 2, 1987 Ell TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O B(...370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising 4101/ ,CE�vkb • ❑ Tearsheet Notice ^!T �� B � J • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Y�F R u • CGa- 1 ' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, )ss COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) being first duly sworn, depose and sWhat 1 Qm t e Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the— a newspaper of general circulillicn as de 'ned in ORS 193 010 and 193.020; published at_—moi-�. _----in the a a'1 pounty a d state; that t�� U.b a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for—_Aa_�__---successive and consecutive in the following issues: Subscribed anQ'swto before, me this --Qac—�r' Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 2_r;,-` T AFFIDAVIT The ronoa[ng xelecl items are putntbed for your latonnatfon. Farther Wormwoon aad fuU agendes map be abtained from the City Recor- der,13125 SW Ball Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon.97223 or by calAng 6394171. ' CITY COUNCIL REGUL.,kR MEE'T'ING—NOVEMBER 2,1987 6:30 P.M.Study Samlon-7:30 P.M.Regular Meeting x TIGARD CIVIC CENTER,TOWN BALL i 13125 S.w.HALL BOULEVARD,TIGARD,OREGON •Clv:1 Air Patrol Presentation } •Local Contract Review Board •Public Hearing; —Temporary Use-TU 10-86—Key Bank of Oregon ATPD#4 —Comprehensive Plan Amendment&Zone Change—CPA 87-06&ZC 87.20—Margery Krueger—NPO#7 r —Compreheinstve Plan Arnendnent&Zone Change—CPA 87-07&ZC 97-21-Citizen Savings&Loan—NPO#5 +EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Council wilt go Into Executive Ses ion under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e),& (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation Isue s. TTS175---Publish Octof is 29.1987 i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON A`' AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING k In the Matter of the Proposed Im STATE OF OREGON ) Cot ity of Washington ) ss City of Tigardam ) I, On e Memel LeAsv�, being first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) 9,7 — `` 41— Iiiii which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being heret attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the °+"\ day of 1987. Ar 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. 2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon 3 . Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon Subscribed and sworn to before me this EI day of �D�/E�ll(l0� 1917. Notary Public for Oregon OK My Commission Expires: N Ar <C n Ln N C c >N :3 LM 0 CN 0 0 c C rX4 W. (D Ln 44 U4 �24 4-, c 0 44 -4 0 �2 0 >-4 -Mz 0 r-4 m 0 ::.. 0 U 0 u 0 a ¢ 41 u co 4n I 1-4 (n Li .. >- ai C 2: 1 L-j En I = r__ U.J 0 m :E: �c -- f r- ? Li r,- LU; I— H t— N U N 0 4t:' co Ln z Ar �o C14 LZ �11 60 LLJ 0 w m UM 3 rd to 0 Q 0 0 C-4 I r., —4 0 LAJ E-4 0 ul u :3 Z3 a- >-4 > 0 .4 >.4 16 C14 U -w C::l C-4 0 = = 0 uj1-4 1-1 w -W -T W Cd 5.1 >- :4 4.) -I rq 0 O 3 L (if L) UJ Ul Cj- L On y I -W L L E--0 U Cn eo zi L) c ti C14 uj 4X <71 Wf C O 2; Cn -j m 1-4 -j cn cli fn -j (n CJ -C -C >, 6-4 Z: fl, L..) J L c c tz L = O M cL u ft 0 = CL CL 0 F- 0 > > ci 0 Z Z: -W d V, M %0 ci r� C.) r� mi %0 N 7� u z w T co CNaL —4 C14 C14 Z= -C C u =1 -0 -C L C14 Ar .16 .'2T T >1 CU L S- L uj uj ui w AGEXDA'ITEM-4f` 2 = VISITOR'S AGENDA` DATE. :November 23 '3987 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheer for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. Ism NAME S ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACIFD CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 2 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: October 2, 1967 EL ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: KEYS TO THE CITY PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet DEPT HEAD 0 CITY ADMIN OK 4fL REQUESTED BY: Mayor and Council POLICY IS.3UE "Keys to the City" are presented to Citizens who have served on a Board or Committee in recognition of their service. INFORMATION SUMMARY The following people are being recognized for their ser�►ice on a Board or Committee: Mike Misovetz Utility and Franchise Committee Chairman Fred Benz Utility and Franchise Member Teri Kaliher Parks Board Member Chris Vanderwood Planning Commission Member Robert Odell Parks Board ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Presentation of "Keys" by Mayor dc:1161D MEMORANDUM y CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON lie C. mm TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council October 22, 1987 FROM: Loreen Wilson, City Recorder \/ SUBJECT: Civil Air Patrol Emergency Coordination Deputy Commander Vaughn Thompson has requested through Councilor Edwards to have a few minutes with Council to discuss how the Civil Air Patrol might be able to assist the City in coordinating responses to emergency situations. lw/1515D w, µ`Y Y" }#y f. i S 4 k. DATE November 2, 1987 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on No am the following item: (Please print the information) IN Item Description: t AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PUBLIC IMARING - TEMPORARY USE - TU 10-85 - KEY BANK OF OREGON - NPO #5 Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation e €t€ l 7 f i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 21987 DATE SUBMITTED: October 14, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing PREVIOUS ACTION: TU .10•-86 — Pac f-i TU 10-86 — Key Bank of Oregon Western Bank _ PREPARED BY: Deborah A. Stuart _ DEPT HEAD OK 'Ili CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: _ am POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY This is a request by Pacific Western Bank of Oregon for renewal of a Temporary Use approval of a mobile office trailer for one year, on property zoned C—F' (Commerci��l Professional). The trailer has been used as an emergency space solution. The company hopes to consolidate its computer and operations service facilities in Tigard and future expansions at the existing site or construction at another location are possibilities, This proposal is identical to that submitted last year except the currected trailer location is depicted. AL'TERNACIVES CONSIDERED 1 . Approvo the recommendation made by the Planning Director for- approval subject: to certain conditions. 2. Approve the recommendation for- approval with modifications. 3 . Deny the application. FISCAL IMPACT -V SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the recommendation made by the Planing Director for approval subject to certain conditions. sb/1360D f MEMORANDUM h, .. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council October 14, 1987 FROM: Deborah A. Stuart, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Key Bank of Oregon (TU 10-86 Renewal) Key Bank of Oregon received approval from the City Council on November 3, 1987 for a one-year temporary use permit to allow placement of a mobile office trailer or property zoned C---P (Commercial Professional) . Resolution 86-123A became effective on November 17, 1986. Key Bank of Oregon has been using the trailer as temporary office space until a new data/operations contcr• can be built on this or another site. -this facility is planned to be complotod by late 1988 or early 1.989. The applicant tratus that until this facility can btu built, it. is mandaL��ry that the trailer s remain on the site. During the last year, the bank has grown from 45 to 72 branches; and a pending merger may acid 10 more branches. Key Bank of Oregon has also been leasing over 10,000 square feat of space until this reorganization of functions occurs . The request as submitted by tho applicant is identical to that of the previous year. The site plan shows the corrected location of the trailer as mandated by the Building Division. sb/1360D 4 �T Key Bank of Oregon A KeyCorp Bank BANK 'dl' Building&Planning - 1211 S.W.Fifth Avenue•Suite 400 Portland,Oregon 97204 (503)790.7577 September 24, 1987 City Council City of Tigard Attn: Deborah A. Stewart P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Request for Extension of Temporary Use of Trailer Dear Ms. Stewart : The Tigard City Council approved the temporary use of a trailer on November 3, 1986 . Due to circumstances listed below, we are requesting an extension of this approval. Key Bank of Oregon (KBO) is the successor in interest to Pacific Western Bank and is the owner of tax lots 3801, 3900, 4100 and 700. Key Pacific Service Corporation (KPSC) is the successor in interest to Associated Computer Service (ACS) and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of KBO. KPSC is the owner of tax lot 3800. KPSC has completed the initial study for the new KPSC Data/Operations Center of about 75 ,000 square feet to be constructed on this site or another site yet to be selected. Plans are to complete this facility by late 1988 or early 1989. Until this new facility is built, it is mandatory that the present Distribution Trailer maintain operation on the existing site and service the KBO and KPSC operations. We have found it necessary to lease over 10,000 square feet off site until this reorganization of function takes place. Since the initial request for temporary use of a trailer, our bank has grown from 45 branches to 72 branches. Another merger is expected to take place by year-end or early 1988 for 10 additional branches. The KPSC Data/Operations Center is planned to service the West Coast operation which includes banks in Washington and later in Utah and Idaho. The planning for this Data/Operations Center and the interim operations at the existing KPSC/KBO Tigard site is extremely critical. l Involved.Innovative. Professional. e'" ���"'!!!"lllrrr City Council City of Tigard Attn: Deborah A. Stewart September 24, 1987 Page 2 We respectfully request approval for continued use of the Distribution Trailer at the existing site. Thank you. 9n rely, d Ta ails Mum i Vice President Enclosures cc: Dave Abts, President, KPSC A6EMbA 5 Ile 1-1st 16-Bb 0 TMnK 0 nVol cw) �r11ai1t!'111°1°'°111IIII 1Jjij 11;111111111111p111i1]1j1�71ijijl��i(1�t'II)ji117f�R1]�1111fI�°11��1;9�°i��1�1115°1piIIi1)Ii1011°�°`}��I1i11111Ifil1 III 11111°1111 Jill 1111111°1°�°9°i�11 y NOTE: IF THIS NICRDFILMED F — .__' 2 3 4 .__ _ rJ - 6_ - 7 $ 8 0 H DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THANTHIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TOT�EA. DRA QUALITY OF THE ORIGINOi --- .__-..___ _ --_--__._... _. DRAWING, _-- OC sa SZ cZ 92 SZ bz CZ ZZ 1z oz 61 81 LI 9i 5! bl el z1 11 O! 6 a 1 9 S E Z J� ! 1�utdloo�uuluNlNu1►uxnnlwn.. 11fi1 MARCH _ _ 5rWl. SAWDBeReF 5T, tau; STALL.S I O L'. �F O m 0 c PI�'pRSED �.•. b.Y 1 pY�OITI✓�1 � {i 6J ,d.S�G'G!GTS '✓rzo��Ed I�' , Q Q � GC%P�1�l.TEfi Pt7DT:DtJ ` �� Y 55FRyIr-r- j # poSFF� _ TMp . Y t�lsra lore Q; I kc%s,Tlou GS�F;G ON I 1! Im Ileo PvG �� AT—, ;--G; yG' \A1 E5 r I i II V i 1~R �-- , ;vic.P V � i�1Af' 2Gs .I- 1p h1t-F 25-I.IGo I _ . . ' _.. _..._.. .w... .- _. .�.n-...a... - .. -.. ........,-w.. ..fq•s-r �-�v�..a - 4 C _ '�M.�tker.^'r.^"!-Y - F;ll►�e{; NOTE: IF THIS MICMFILMED ._—_- 2 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - - THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. .'-- --_-- 0£ 62 BZ LZ 9Z S2 bZ £2 2Z DATE November 2, 1987 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 SAA' PUBLIC HEARING--- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONE -- CHANGE - CPA 87-06 & ZC 87-20 MARGERY KRUEGE.R - NPU #7 MM Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) rNIme, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation �,ll► nr..1 11 ! A .I `^ e'Q _ -X��`1 Lace- r. i i E CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 2,......1987 ........-- DAT[. -SUBMITTED: October .22, 1987 AM" ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Kruger CPA 87-06/ PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning commission VL ZC 87-20 recommendation for denial PREPARED BY: Keith Liden- V-1 : DEPT HEAD OK CITY\'ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY -Z-==................. POLICY ISSUE Vicinity Map Attached. INFORMATION SUMMARY On October 6, 1907, the Commission reviewed the above application and recommended denial. Attached is a copy of a draft resolution, the Staff report, the Commission minutes, a letter from Washington County, and the applicant's submittal. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1 . Hold a public hooriri�j to consider- the application and deny the requout as recommendod, 2. Hold a public hearing to consider the application and approve the request as recommonclod. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Hold a public hearing to consider the application and deny the application and adopt the attached resolution. cs/1462D JOW X-1 1=1110=01 IN Kamm- TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 6, 1987 1. Vice President Owens called the meeting to order at 7:50 PM. The meeting was held at the Tigard Civic Center - TOWN HALL ROOM - 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Vice President Owens, Commissioners Barber, Peterson, Leverett, Newton, and Moen (arrived 8:15). Absent: Commissioner Pyre. (Two vacant positions) Staff: Keith Liden, Senior Planner; Elizabeth Newton, Senior Planner; Jerry Offer, Assistant Planner; Diane Jelderks, Planning Commission Secretary. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Barber seconded to approve minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present. Commissioner Newton abstained. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION The applicant and applicant's representative for items 5.1 and 5.2 requested that the Commission hear the items in reverse order because of the number of people in attendence for item 5.2. The Commission agreed. 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 87-07 ZOtiE CHANGE 87-21 CITIZENS SAVINGS AND IRAN NPO # 7 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment on 43.26 acres from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and a Zone Change request from R-4.5 (PD) (Low Density Residential, 4.5 units/acre Planned Development) to R-7 (PD) (Medium Density Residential, 7 units/acre, Planned Development.) LOCATION: South of Summer Lake Park, east of 130th Avenue. (WCTM 1S1 33DD lot 100). Senior Planner Liden reviewed the proposal stating that the request is for R-T single family residential with 5,000 square foot minimum lots, and that there are a number of different accesses for the proposed project. The staff concluded that the porposed amendment is consistent with the plan's policy. Staff recommended the Commission forward the proposal to City Council with a recommendation for approval. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Ryan O'Brien, representing Citizens Savings and Loan, summarizing their proposal. He explained they would. not be developing the property to as high a density as they are requesting; they are proposing 210 lots. This request would help the City meet its goal of 10 units per buildable acre. am The main access road would be 135th, with other accesses being 128th and Katherine Steet. The proposal meets the locational criteria. Also, the density would be compatible because of the higher densities in the area. PLANNING CONXISSION MINUTES - October 6, 1987 - Page 1 PUBLIC TESTIMONY o David Patterson, 12150 SW 128th, opposed the request. Regardless of the applicant's intent, they would be allowed to develop to the maximum allowed. Initially all traffic would access down 128th and Katherine, which has noticed a significant change since Katherine Street was put through, especially with building material trucks. He noted that a previous proposal had been denied on the basis that it would be a threat to the livability of the area, and this proposal would do the same. o Jeff Gray, 12170 SW 128th, stated he has seen a significant change in traffic in the 3 1/2 years he has lived on 128th. His concern was that traffic would not use 135th to get to Scholls Ferry because of its poor condition and that the traffic instead will cut through the residential area to 121st to Scholls Ferry Road. Also there is no guarantee that the property would develop with lots only slightly smaller than 7500 square feet. Smaller lots would bring about a decline in property values and would create tract homes instead of a planned develoment. o Nancy Campbell, 12790 SW Katherine St, was concerned that an additional parcel north of Mary Woodard School should be developed in conjunction with this site. She was concerned about water runoff, because of the hard clay ground. She opposed high. density going in the middle of low density. She was concerned about the condition of the roads which would serve the development. o Bruce Parker, 12705 SW Katherine, was concerned about the increased traffic. He felt this property should not be developed until 135th is improved. When he purchased his property he had checked the zoning and confirmed he would be abutting R-4.5 and he would like to have that zoning maintained. He requested everyone who is opposed to the proposal to please stand up. (Majority of the audience stood.) o Jim Nielsen, 12410 SW 128th, stated that there has been an extraordinary increase in traffic as well as speed on 128th. He stated there are significant traffic problems on Scholls Ferry and even Summer Lake owners avoid using Scholl Ferry Road. Even if 135th is the main access, the majority of the trafffic will still use 128th. If this is approved, something needs to be done to minimize the impact on 128th. Also, this property is within the Beaverton School District, which means Beaverton buses will be using Tigard streets to pick up children in this area. o Dennis Kruger, 12612 SW Snow Brush Ct., agreed with the previous speakers. He did not feel the applicant met Goal 5 as there is no additinal open space proposed. He felt a 46 percent increase in density is not a small increase. o Barbara Brandes, 12140 SW 127th, stated that this is a neighborhood with lots of children and they already have a problem with trucks speeding down the dead end street, slamming on their brakes, then backing out again. o Sheryl Norris, 12815 SW Katherine, opposed the proposal stating that there is substantial wildlife in the area that had not been addressed. f PLANNING COMMISSI0N 14INUTES - October 6, 1987 - Page 2 o Maxine Resler, 12135 SW 128th, agreed with previous testimony and opposed the proposal. o Earl Resler, 12135 SW 128th, agreed with previous testimony and opposed the proposal. o J. A. Paterson, 11605 SW Manzanita, stated he had no quarrel with the density. However, he owns 5 acres north of Mary Woodard school, which is landlocked and he will need an access when this site develops. Discussion followed with Commissioners on how property became landlocked. o Doris Parlukovich, 12345 SW 128th, suggested that the access road be improved prior to development and that 128th be blocked off. o Jane Hamilton, 12285 SW 128th, agreed with previous testimony adding that they had expected the park area to be larger than it is. o Thomas Crompton, 1.2995 SW Katherine, agreed with previous testimony and opposed the proposal. o Leonard Kapp, 12245 SW 128th Ave, opposed the development and agreed with the previous testimony. o Roger Heath, 12215 SW 128th Ave., opposed the proposal stating that a Ar traffic study needed to be done to see what the impact would be on the neighborhood. o Mary Phillips, 12940 SW Katherine, was concerned about the traffic impact to the neighborhood. o Mark Zimel, 12925 SW Katherine questioned if the projected 110 additional trips during the peak hour were based on the potentenial or just for the extra 108 lots. He noted that a Comprehensive Plan amendment could be granted only if an error had been made but that this had not been addressed. He was also concerned on how they would treat the greenway. o Tony Stratis, 12165 SW 128th, opposed the proposal. He was concerned about the traffic impact and supported the neighbors' testimony. o Art Lutz, 12800 SW Gacier Lily Circle, requested denial of the application.. He reviewed the history of the site, stating that the previous developer had been denied a zone change because it was not good for the City or its citizens. REBUTTAL o Ryan O'Brien stated he was not aware of the previous zone change request. He was willing to have the Commission put a limit of 210 - 215 units on the site. He also stated that the development would not intrude into the Greenway and the development would provide an access to the landlocked property. He stated that 135th is scheduled for construction in the spring and that the Murray Blvd. extension should be constructed soon. He noted that no one was taking advantage of the R-12 and R-25 zoning nearby but were developing as single family residential., which should allow for an ;additional 30 units on this site. Discussion followed regarding the size of the lots and accesses. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 6, 1987 Page 3 o Vice President Owens commented that the park size did not shrink and suggested anyone interested in what is planned for the park should obtain a copy of the recently adopted park plan. o Senior Planner Liden reviewed the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan, which allows for a connection of 128th to Winter Lake Drive or 130th, noting that the method had not been described. Also, the site would require a storm drainage system which would be approved through engineering. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioner Peterson did not feel there was a need for smaller lots, and because of the negative impact to the surrounding neighborhood, opposed the proposal. o Don Moen stated that he would not be voting, however he concurred with Commissioner Peterson, adding that development of 130th is a long way off. o Commissioners Barber, Leverett, Newton, and Owens all opposed the development as being ahead of its time and having negative traffic impacts. a Commissioner Newton moved and Commissioner Leverett seconded to forward CPA 87-07 and ZC 87-21 to City Council with a recommendation for denial ''��.• based on the finding that Policy 8.1.1 will not be satisifed due to the lack of access through 130th. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present. Commissioner Moen abstained. 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 87-06 ZONE CHANGE ZC 87-20 MARGERY KRUEGER NPO # 7 For a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone.Change for a 5 acre parcel from C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-25 (Medium High Density Residential, 25 units/acre) and a second Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change request to change 15 acres of land from R-25 to C-G (General Commercial). LOCATION: East side of New Scholls Ferry Road along the i north and south side of the proposed Murray Blvd. extension (WCTM 2S1 4B lot 101). 4 Senior Planner reviewed the proposal explaining the history of the existing C-N site. Discussion followed regarding the alignment of Old Scholls and New Scholls Ferry Road. Senior Planner Liden continued by outlining the plan's criteria for a plan and zone amendment and additional direction of the City Council that staff did not feel the applicant met. He summarized a letter received from Washington County and made staff's recommendation for denial. Discussion followed regarding several findings and conclusions, and City Council's policy for replacing residential density when residentially zoned property is rezoned to commercial. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Russ Krueger, 1335 SW 66th # 402, Portland, OR 97225 explained his reasons for wanting to move the C-N zoning from the opposite side of the Murray Blvd. extension. He stated that he had just' received a copy of the letter from Washington County and would be talking with them about their PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 6, 1987 - Page 4 comments. He felt because of the amount of single family development in the area that there is a need for a 15 acre Commercial Center and that this would not take away from the downtown plan; that the site is buffered by R-12 zoning to the south, and noted that there are other shopping centers that have residential property abutting more than two sides, i.e. Howards on Scholls and Canterbury Square. He stated that he is asking for help for tomorrow by reserving this area as C-G. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o The consensus of the Commission was that the criteria had not been met to warrant making the change. Commissioners Newton, Leverett, and Moen where not opposed to just moving the C-N to the opposite side of the proposed Murrary Blvd. extension. * Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Leverett seconded to forward CPA 87-06 and ZC 87-20 to City Council with a recommendation for denial based on the finding that policy 5.1.4 had not been met. Motion carried by majority of Commissioner present, Commissioner Moen voting no. 5.3 AMENDMENT TO PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR S 8-86 BUTLER TERRACE SUBDIVISION NPO #6 Request to modify a condition of approval requiring a sidewalk between the end of SW Inez and SW 97th Avenue. Located: East of SW 97th Aveneue and west of SW Inez St. (WCTM 2S1 11AC lot 2700). Senior Planner Liden reviewed the applicant's request to eliminate the pedestrian pathway and made the staff recommendation for retention of the pathway/sidewalk. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Sam Gotter, 9541 SW Inez, Developer/Owner, stated the main reason for his request is for the safety issue and the difficulty of the grade. He explained that they would construct a walkway which would connect the sidewalk to the Tuality Junior High parking lot and that the school had agreed to maintain that portion. Discussion followed regarding the extension into the school parking lot and portions of the path/sidewalk the applicant is requesting to eliminate. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Darwin Webb, 9529 SW Inez, has resided at this address since May and felt the area would only be used by John Q. Public. He supported the applicant's request as he was concerned for injuries which would occur from the path being used by skateboarders. o Jim Castile, 9563 SW Inez, supported the applicant's request based on the safety issue and because of the problems that would be attracted. o Audrey Castile, 9563 SW Inez, supported the applicant's request. She was concerned with the safety issue and that the sidewalk would be used by the public and would create problems such a trash thrown in her yard or defacing of the fence. PLANNYNG COMUSSION MINUTES - : October 6, 1987 - Page 5 PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Consensus of the Commission is that the property owuers in the area are more familar with the problems and the need for the pathway. * Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Moen seconded to amend final order 86-15PC deleting the requirement for a bike path and a portion of the sidewalk and installing the crossover into the school parking lot as the applicant requested. Notion carried by majority of Commissioners present. Commissioner Newton abstained. Commissioner Leverett and Senior Planner Liden left 11:05. 5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 87-03, ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 87-04 ZONE CHANGE ZC 87-16 NPO # 1 A remand by the City Council for amendment to the Findings, Policies, and Implementation Strategies Document to add Action Area goals and policies as an additional area of Special Concern; to assign the Action Area overlay to the CBD district; to amend the Tigard Municipal Code to add a chapter regulating development in Action Areas; and, to review Chapter 18.66 CBD zoning district requirements. o Senior Planner Newton review the purpose and intent of the proposed MAW amendments. Discussion followed regarding the purpose, intent, and process. o Consensus of the Commission is that the prohibited uses should be conditional uses. Discussion followed regarding the use of Drive In window services. * Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to forward CPA 87-03, ZOA 87-04, and ZC 87-16 to City Council recommending the following changes: 1. That this be an interim plan. 2. Strike drive-through restaurant windows. 3. Modify "Prohibited Uses" to "Conditional Use" or limit the prohibitied uses to new developments. Also, that existing property owners be made aware of these proposed changes. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present, Commissioner Newton voting no. 6. OTHER BUSINESS o There was no other business. 7. ADJOURNMENT - 11:45 PM Diane M. Jelderks ATTEST: Bonnie Owens, Vice President 1336D/cs Page 6 pI,ANWWG COMMISSION MINUTES - October 6, 1987 - WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON September 30, 1987 i b 1987 CITY OF tIGARD Keith Liden PLANNING DEPT. City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: CPA 87-06/ZC 87-20 (KRUEGER PROPERTY) Planning Division staff has reviewed the materials submitted to support CPA 87-06/ZC 87-20. We find these materials to be insufficient to justify the significant increase in commercial property proposed by the applicant. Speci- ficially, we have serious concerns about the following: Transportation 1 . There is insufficient analysis provided regarding the affects of this development on the transportation system. The applicant states "Adequate plans have been submitted with this application demonstrating that adequate transportation facilities have been planned for development of the property". We can find no such information in the applicant's submittal . Our brief analysis indicatesthat an additional 500 p.m. peak-hour trips would be added to roads in the vicinity. No analysis of the affect of these trips has been provided. 2. The applicant's statements regarding the functional classification of Scholls Ferry Road and the Murray Blvd. connection are incorrect. The applicant refers to these streets as "major thoroughfares". The Murray Blvd. connection is defined as a "collector" in the Washington County/ Tigard UPAA, and Scholls Ferry Road is proposed to be downgraded from a minor arterial to a major collector in the new Washington County Transportation Plan currently under development. Market Analysis 1 . The proposal appears to be inconsistent with the recently completed study of commercial land needs along the Scholls Ferry Road corridor. The applicant states staff concluded that there is no need for additional commercial sites along Scholls Ferry Road". If this is the case, how can the applicant then claim that their request ". . .would provide a suitable location for additional commercial . . ." when it has been found there is no need? Department of Land Use And Transportation,Planning Division. 150 North First Avenue Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 Ph,+t. 50:4 1 t348 876 Keith Liden September 30, 1987 Page 2 2. The applicant continual .y states that retail purchases must be made within a 1-2 mile radius. The applicant provides no documentation suggesting why this must occur or if it does in most other places. In addition, •it should be noted that large portions of the $16,000 estimated annual retail expenditure Per household are made outside of the immediate area at highly dispersed special retail centers that need market areas larger than 1-2 miles to support them. 3. The applicant states that there is the potential for 48,384 households within the market area in question. This number is unrealistically high. It does not account for non-residential development, street right-of-way, open space, public uses, etc. As a result their estimate of $774 million of annual retail expenditures in the future is grossly overinflated. 4. The applicant has not included the vacant commercial site at the western intersection of Scholls/Old Scholls Ferry Roads in his analysis of alternative commercial sites within a 1-2 mile radius nor does he consider the existing 5 acre commercial designation on the subject property. 5. The analysis overlooks the existence of numerous other retail developments, i .e. , Washington Square, Cascade Plaza, Cascade Blvd. , Allen/Murray inter- section, Allen/Lombard intersection, and Greenway/Hall intersection. Miscellaneous I . The proposed site does not meet the locational criteria for general commercial in Tigard. The site is completely surrounded by residential districts, not just abutted on two sides as required by Tigard development standards. 2. The general commercial district allows a wide variety of uses that may not be appropriate in the area. Overall , we feel that the applicant has not submitted a complete or accurate appli- cation. In particular, we are concerned with the affect such a large commercial site would have on the future Scholls/Murray intersection. Until it can be demon- strated that the plan amendment will not adversely affect transportation facilities in the vicinity and that the additional commercial land is clearly needed, we must I . ter our opposition to this proposal . ct_l"e L Curtis ing Manager BC:mb Pf0p0S2d NORTH POINTE ° ShoppingCenter � Russell A. Krueger 1225 S.W. 66th Ave. # 402 Portland, Oregon 97225 1-503-297-3349 L A N D D E 9 E L 0 P H E N T C O N S U L T A N T S 209 N.E. Lincoln Ave. , Suite "B" Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 ' (503) 648-4061 Bob Oquist, PLS George Wilhelm , PE Ryan O'Brien, Planner Joe Thompson, Project Mgr. DATE: August 21 , 1987 REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change 15 acres of land zoned R-25 and R-12 to General Commercial , and 5 .0 acres from Neighborhood Commercial to R-25 . APPLICANT: Russell A. Krueger PROPERTY OWNER: Marge Krueger (now Crist) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tax Lot 101 , Map 2S1-4B ( see Exhibit "A" contour and lot line map on the following page) . SIZE: 19 . 98 acres ( 14 .98 acres Commercial , and 5.00 acres Residential ) . LOCATION: East side of New Scholls Ferry Road along the north and south side of the proposed Murray Boulevard extension. INTRODUCTION This application is a request to relocate a 5 acre neighborhood commercial site as shown by Exhibit 'B" , from the north side of the proposed Murray Boulevard extension to its south side . This commercial site application is proposed to be increased to 15 acres and re-zoned general commercial to allow a wider variety of uses to service the shopping needs of existing and future residents in the area. The name of the proposed shopping center Is North Pointe. W Exhibit "C" shows the site in relation to a 1 and 2 mile radius . to demonstrate the central location of the property. The City of Beaverton and Tigard are now finalizing a study to determine the need for additional commercial development along the Old Scholls Ferry Road corridor and north Tigard. Beaverton Staff has concluded that there isn' t any need for additional commercial sites along Old Scholls Ferry Road. This proposed development will occur following the completion of the Murray Boulevard extension. Because of the anticipated rapid rate of development and growth in the area, we feel it is very important for the City of Tigard to identify an adequate inventory of commercial sites in advance of development. This identification will insure compatibility with nearby future emm # oDAI Lj� PiC) L n1 it Til (EPA z c s ..:: . . .... i�1'li}► ifalifi i1+�rp f1i y1 +ra 11i 111 i ipi 1i1 i I + i I a L I l I.J In'1'�T�T�'Tml P 'P f STI`�q1Pil.!f��iiij+Pl�iPT��fi��la�iP?(+i1`aPa�+lsl+Pr�II]Jill III IIIli III IP+ ala��Pi�ila�ii��+Pyeia'�fe�►ai .� NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED . DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN 12 - THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL = _ DRAWING. _,: _� 06 6? 92 J. 8Z Sz 4z cz zz Iz oz 61 el LI 91 Sf- bi ei--Zr _II OI s e 1 5 —5- _b _e__ _Z P"`��' t .netaulaniluuiiiHluulka�imluee�nn9 - -``- —� . .. - s11�j i 9r%o ----- \ \ -O - \ I 4! O t I I I I Hill Marlin H. 9 Marilyn D. HopfeMornin I 1 _ , @ Dr / /Tox/ Lot 1300 Mop ISI-33C 14- N I V /CV \ —�� COMMERCIAL _ _-,i_ _ _' i gist Ct. SITE � I d 5.8 0 Acres Gross I 5,00 Acres Net Hindn.. / ✓ , 3 ti // //// h a / 9 / Proposed / aNORTH POINTE '3o COMMERCIAL SITE / /6.79 Acres Gross v o 14.98 Acres Net R.17' ��Z_Z� 12 a R!CrARD 48ANCR0;-T` RESIDENTIAL SITE — F F ; -. ;,� „ 4 a \ _f 25125 18.54 Acres Gross Z • � I � � r/ / // r/ I 6121 , 7.32 Acres Net ``260 / I I � — •o / �; / �� I s\ /�-�f\ ��� / / i R.E. BANCROFT a ASSOCIATES, INC. V / 'CIVIL ENGINEERS - LAND SURVEYORS - PLANNERS o I JJ� �-� \� 140 N.E. 3rd Ave., Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Q w �6 ,1 I \ ,_,- - -- _-� - - - - - - -- - -- - - -- 648-4101 Lj - _ j \J I Revised 8-/9-87 ' "A" a a 1 - - \-- - - -- - �-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -� -- 2�°�_ � I rfland Gas & C ke ment� - > \ For: 1?uss 1frcce961- � 11 `c OD / 1 A �artioi.. o," Tax .Cot /O/, MaP aS/-�B 1 N �� / / �`' lY2s/ccic9z�o^� Ga%.rcty, Oreyo.v Scale: /"z /00i December 30, 1986 iL _ - - �,. _,wn.- _r: �--- ,; +�,���.•^,.. ;- �� -^-^ ..� -rid��«.a� K.km II (111181111111111111111 1 If111(I'1111111 1111111 111]IP r m IP III 111 T n r III III I � � � � �j j 1 � 11j r �111 11 I _( I I.I (�l�l]IIII11�(�1111J7]It11111111�1�11(11111111111111!�11��111161111t4]Iirltu�N11}11 � j. NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED 2 4 5 - 6 7 8 9 e0 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL i DRAWING. --------I OE 6z 82=--1Z 92 SZ 11,Z ..ez iz�i oz _61_-61----11- 9�. 5�,- b� Of- -it if 01_6 6 lot,It?A&=521"M Q Vol W 4T 0 ju JAWY ittit .........INot flow tay ..................is-Tow Q too-, F AlMoff ..............anorygy M mom took Loom M itIittI---- ------v... ........ - ----------it....... am a too........................... ----iMR, Amoy x Etna slow to A I........... itWAAW00 non, -WQ itVon"iiAn_EARN .......... tIitAip W 01 vim titEb a KI H=5 Room ,,Inioial Itail Ell I tW Us SAW Q%, yam koos ..........==n a it - AZT I n itVERB moll,WiS ------ -spy WINKRIS KOKO INMI 00 W Willy Mon............t ...................................... Volt mom It I ... ........ 7-7- itOgg; us gtw"-"W�W,by'M Woo saw 7r .. .............. owl Olu"...................... tsoup ell ;ROFILg T�j vim YWAM I 0 Ii........... ,�� qtr.- t . �., � " � +•fin F nk i >Kr . ''�{�.� �•�lp" , ;' ^fir n' �' .F /� L 3A 404, J^ ..,{ s,.'�"F,e+,rhl�k- •cif,{jt3 t 'tZ r � ,� ,:-u_..,✓" a'y " :ion � �r r . ' t a�g Ashburv-Lane .� •. gnat >i "M �.''•�'�"••��-- +ty Felring Lane ppb y• Swenda� ku a- Morning Hill Drive I Crist Ct. �+ ^ SHERSTON Y 10�! fr01 1 r3 3 i AO A 'n� .. ltlndOn Ct. HURRAY HLNQ 'a "NORTH r commtRDiAL . . �gyLr Y'� k ; CH4LRFORD F a ' �uture R SI DENTFA QEV�ED Ad fll �` iA _. ,. k w A>, x11111111111111 III IIIII41IID 1111111 1111111 I IIIII(I 11711711 T(I 171 111 1111111 1111111 1111111 411111 1711111 Ijlllll 1111111 1111111 Illlgl Plyl 1111111 IPI41 III IIII 111111 UI ..1 I I I NOTE: Ir— NID.11LED I 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 9 10 11 12 DRAWING Is IEss O.AR TNAN ' Tests NOTICE,IT Is DUE TO Now THE QUALITY OF TIE ORIGINAL DRANING. OE 62 92 LZ 9Z SZ 4Z EZ ZZ IF OF 61 9I LI 91 1.91 t1f EI ZII 111�.•101 6 0 L 9 E b E 12.'1 I""" 111111111111111111111111111111111111111�IIIIINI11111111111IIIIIIIIIII9111191I01(llWllltllJlllllliluWDWII1111WIU1111U1)IWIUIIIIIIYf111ilIli1W111111111111111111U91�I1I11WWU11ullllilllll111(fill'lIII111111IiIIII11u11111IIIlDIIIIIIIIIIIlI11111III�1111iLNIlUUlll11' ' MARCH ,1990 Y-a f ............. ............ YAB, R'If IL ,pvm­ f-o'. IN iJ ild rm ' ���� A'��' 3�X34�����`��'� �' za, ��•�i r.� }r� [`v� y. � .« a 41i 4 IN FOR 11.2 Rig "Mm t. so$ I' "fog ..... ............. �� J�j— I.- residential development and guarantee that a proper amount of commercial land is available. What is proposed is the DYNAMICS of reserving available , commercial zoned land TODAY to meet the needs of TOMMOROW by a reasoned and documented plan. Otherwise, UNFORTUNATELY, what will occur is another instance of being too late and no available land for commercial uses. This proposal will allow the City to act in advance of future traffic and increased congestion, rather than wait for it to happen. Only two other commercial sites are located within this 2 mile radius. They include the new Columbia Willamette/Murray Hill Shopping Center on Murray Boulevard and the Howard's Shopping Center on 121st Street and Scholls Ferry Road . Howard' s is fully serviced and Murray Hill is under construction. Neither are designed to accommodate additional commercial development. ' Murray Hill will be completed in the near future . According to J.D. Meyskins of Columbia Willamette, this center is 50% leased and is expected to be 100% leased soon after completion. Lack of commercial development alternatives are demonstrated by congestion and limited parking at Howard's . This site is currently over built because of the lack of available commercial land in the City of Tigard . How many times during the day have we attempted a left turn to S .W. Scholls Ferry Road from Howard's? Other commercial sites in proximity to the subject property are located on the east side of Highway 217 in the Washington Square area ,and in King City at the intersection of Durham Road and Pacific Highway. Both of these sites are too far removed from existing and proposed residential development around the subject property to serve the shopping needs of residents in the area. In conclusion, this site will alleviate what we daily experience In Beaverton and Tigard ; the frustration, hazard , and congestion of those existing shopping complexes. 2 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSFER PROPOSAL This plan amendment and zone change application has been submitted concurrently with a request to increase the density of a 43 acre residential site located south of the Summer Lake Park as shown by the aerial photograph taken in April , 1987, on the following page (Exhibit "D") . This property is identified as Tax Lot 100 , Map 151-33DD as shown by Exhibit "E" on the next page. If this commercial zone change is approved , there would be a need n to increase density of vacant land to accommodate an additional 101 dwelling units . This proposed Summer Lake Plan Amendment would provide an additional 108 dwelling units by increasing the density from R-4 . 5 to R-7 . Concurrent approval of both of these applications would insure no reduced residential density and retainage of a net density of 10 units per acre. A specific breakdown of this density transfer resulting from these 2 concurrent plan amendments , are as follows : - 14 .98 net acres from Krueger commercial zone change 5.00 net acres removed from neighborhood commercial and rezoned R-25 9 .98 net acres rezoned general commercial 3 . 76 acres in R-12 6 .22 acres in R-25 3. 76 net acres in R-12 zoning (Krueger) X 12 units/acre j45 units removed by Krueger commercial re-zone { 6 .22 net acres in R-25 zoning (Krueger) X 25 units/acre 156 units removed by Krueger commercial rezone 45 + 156 - 201 units total removed by Krueger rezone r �i 1311 acres of vacant residential land in City. X 10 units per acre average density when LCDC acknowledged Tigard's plan. total potential unit In City - 201 units removed by Krueger commercial rezone Balance ol potentisi units units/acre average 3 r of 't'� A � .*� r �. • � •F�e������ '�t :�S ['{�.: I 5 ' 2 tl..�Mf s ""IM I f 1 < cYti � �t•,d^.c .'� yr t u:....'h ub', a'}�y � r nq "'^^, Los .r z „ �}4,y� .• c t f. 4. :fit• F� ��i 't j r•s .T T' '�.. �/ t .phot" � + J 'D• M t� ! AYy, '[;F r e ]31Y'� 6$+v? y i. W`.. • �'#c, r� '�' eft'•• • + b �-'�t w 1 -r'r , • t r• s��,�'n _ ' i ' 4r ,,�'y,���frrr".�'�"'�it ��,3f• �b �' _ �.i�•�.'4'� [� t t. ° f�xti.�lr*.n � '_ •. .�., �x. s } �' �' rh ✓+.ltf�n�- +� 4i foil �� � 'f r�. WF 1.�{ }C; �k� tr,, , .fj ti 11 FP-t*'- r£t ' x ���•' Y �k �rh!.: .. t ;-,iti t � r '� r-�'Saa S x id•{�°��•T3 ,r'�s''i' ✓: .. ti 5- Y Y:f tt�► �� syr��� 1.4 t. a F...� "t L.��k' '�' ! �� .,c� • � 3';r. �,1 a�. ., y�j�'!' ,.f•Y ry„fa.,b t• � a f• t �t W id s s'3 J T s s i Y, �'�t r"` 's`�•il t _e=S' ','-f'i`r ^+�'-"e -+ -¢-.....,.: 54, Y�T,g(c�S�r.4�..s�x�n.±�:.CST• f d ^ y 1, "�.L:bt ,y."`'§..i'kk "3 r ry�yry'Y .iy.:•.F � ' � +'� �, t • 'F3 �� abry � � t ~ r j f•t �� `}' � ,r, `' I d �y .'t��`�.�V r � ` q�' , A jr '� E'a 3`!C rz� � x.'[1•.2 Ft, .•'�•f y u A t � i 4 4.., s:Ki y [�K �;_ ,, t+ at ' { � �, �>� .�._. �f �r< '�'.r3C 4y ,�' � '+� v�' x ` .� r'is. �.�� ' � � V,u v'd,. �r :,> r F-' t •�f3'�+ �4 as d � r F,�R ' '�•. � zr �`�.,�, 4 t o `.i '{ ry s, r,dr• a ,.v J -7:`- f" qr. [` t l u t F i ° •� +.t s et'��•r k+9 � s; z. a a►r i."S� rt F�;. �.A:, '�' k 7•. `�,. vas Yr t .+ ,r 1 r 4't - z Y x.,y� '-, d.' �r-• < .. n � r �}, Y• t ',�� t .T � r i .,.. "- .It' L �k •I_ �.:n 1.::I"-a .M1 13 a WIWI aw 4 ziYt t tLi ► ^,:� .`� L , lb If co 33 t a d. s{ a{ � ! � a # y ,, H� '' r! � i � i y � ti r R y i L-' •` xd, ;. ..Y. : ., fK. 1.�:�' 1.y,A s-. �. , '{.'�..i Y .Y w� .: .. ..�.....F �. �.-..�.. r.1�' '�;'•.Y'_"t�"'!'S""e.,'�,`i .... ._. h .1 _ s _. ..�'....._.�+. .r �.., � •.-.'�_ �. ....... MOM 1311 acres of vacant residential land x 10 acres of Krueger rezone from residential to commercial 1301 acres of vacant residential land following removal of Krueger commercial X 10 units per acre requirement in the City of Tigard 13 ,010 units required to be accommodated in City - 12 ,909 balance of potential units after Krueger re-zone 101 units needed to raise City average from 9 . 92 units per acre to 10 units per acre. 108 unit increase on Citizen Savings and Loan property by rezone from R-4 . 5 to R-7 (43 .26 acres X 2. 5 units per acre) CONCLUSION: The 108 additional units from the Citizens Savings and Loan rezone for property south of the Summer Lake Park, offsets the 101 units loss from the Krueger Commercial rezone. +� 4 i DEMONSTRATED NEED Exhibit "C" shows the existing development within a 1 and 2 mile radius of the subject property. Assuming development potential of 6 units per acre within the 12.6 square miles within the 2 mile radius of the subject property, there would be a potential of 48 ,384 households. According to the attached report from the Donnelley Marketing Information Services of Dunn and Bradstreet Corporation, as shown by Exhibit "F" on the following page , there are 8 , 713 households within a 2 mile radius of the subject property and a projected 9 ,729 households by the year 1992 . A comparison of the shopping availability at Howard's , Murray Hill , and Tigard Thriftway demonstrates a significant lack of commercial uses to satisfy the shopping needs of residences in the area. According to the document "Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers" published by the Urban Land Institute in 1985 , the annual medium volume in the nation for supermarkets is $265 per square foot and $127 per square foot for drug stores and other similar types of shops. i The Donnelley Marketing Information Service report on the following page ( Exhibit "F" ) shows annual retail expenditure per household of approximately $16 ,000 . Multiplying this number by the existing households produces a retail volume of approximately r $139 million within a 2 wile radius of the subject property . t1 The information on page 6 demonstrates that either 782 of the household expenditures within a 2 mile radius occurs away from Howard's or Tigard Thriftway or there is an artificially high expenditure at those 2 stores. When Murray Hill is completed , an additional 120 ,000 square feet of shopping center facilities will be available to take up the slack. However, these 3 centers combined still only represent about 1/3 of the household expenditures within a 2 mile radius. When saturation development at 6 units per acre occurs, 93% of household expenditures should occur outside of the 2 mile study area. If not, then shopping at Murray Hill , Howard's, and Tigard Thriftway would be extremely congested . Future household expenditures at saturation development would be $774 million per year compared to the current volume of $139 million. Combined expenditures at the Howard's , Murray Hill , and Tigard Thriftway should be $40 million under normal circumstances . However, as demonstrated from the statistics, their volume must be much higher than average . This is especially true for Howard's because Murray Hill isn' t completed yet. 5 DONNELLEY RKETING -INFORMATION SERVI 3 A COMPANY OF 'rRE DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORkiION .RUBS A E L MARKET POTENTIAL 06/10/87 'T?RRAY RD/SCHOLLS FERRY RD, TIGARD* OR 1985 ANNUAL SHOPPING CENTER DONNELLEY EXPENDITURE POTENTIAL INDEX REGIONAL U.S. 131 .9 138.4 ---------------------------------------------------------- EXPENDITURE POTENTIAL GROWTH RATE ( 1980-86) : AREA REGION USA PER HOUSEHOLD 4.98% 4 .81% 4 . 67% TOTAL 8.84% 6. 15% 6.00% --------------------------------------------------- TOTAL TOTAL HOUSEHOLD ERAGE MEDIAN HH. YEAR POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION HH. SIZE INCOME 1980 2231 729 2229• ' $30291 F -- 1986 2702 905 2?02 . 9 $42664 -------------------------------------------- ANNUALANNUAL ANNUALIZED GROWTH EXPENDITURE TOTAL $ PER RATE ( 1980-1986) POTENTIAL INDEX ( $000) HSHLD TOTAL PER HSHLD REGION U.S . i GROCERYSTO 3616 399 8. 54% 4 . 70% 118 .6 127 .8 STORE 2013 2224 8.85% 5 .00% 128.4 126. 1 AST FOOD REST. 792 875 9.22% 5 . 35% 141 .6 157 . 1 LULL SERV. REST. 988 1092 9.07% 5 . 2i% 143. 2 159.6 DRUG STORE 608 671 9. 30% 5 . 43% 114 .8 116 . 7 I7NITURE STORE 392 433 8. 55% 4 . 71% 142 . 3 149. 2 ,-2ARTMENT STORE 2218 2451 8 .92% 5 .07`K 144 .0 148 . 9 GIFT CATALOG 248 274 9 .87% 5 . 98% 138.0 144 . 0 IQUOR STORE 426 470 8 . 71% 4 . 86% 148 .0 195.0 ARIETY STORE 194 215 9 .06% 5 . 22% 140.9 151 . 6 E HOE STORE 190 210 8 .96% 5 . 10% 139. 2 144 . 5 } PPAREL STORE 931 1028 9. 27% 5.40% 148.0 146. 8 } EWELRY STORE 223 247 7 .54% 3 . 73% 160. 7 174 . 4 PPLIANCE STORE 140 155 8 .72% 4 . 87% 135.0 126.5 HARDWARE STORE 177 i95 8 .89% 5 .04% 133.5 135.5 � OME IMPROVEMENT CENTER 378 417 9. 10% 5 . 23% 134 .0 133.9 OY STORE 76 84 7 .90% 4 .08% 144. 8 144 .4 � PHOTO STORE 43 47 8.66% 4 .83% 138.3 163. 5 ONVENIENCE STORE ------700 773 8 .54% 4 .70% 125. 1 130. 7 ARKET POTENTIAL 14353 15857 E EXPENDITURE POTENTIAL INDEX - SHOWS THE AMOUNT BY WHICH AREA PER HOUSEHOLD 1 EXPENDITURES DIFFER FROM THAT WITHIN THE REGION & THE NATION. VALUES BELOW 100 SIGNIFY THAT AREA IS BELOW REGIONAL OR NATIONAL PER HSHLD EXPENDITURES. 1 . 1 . 0 RING: 1 .00 MILE(S) : 45.4383 122.8244 - INDICATES SUPPRESSION HAS OCCURRED OPYRIGHT 1986 D.M.I .S. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. (800) 527 - DMIS RW ME DONNELLEY MARKETING :VFOR` A :ON S=RV:CES A COMPANY OF THE DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION 'RUBB AND F *# RUBB & ELL•IS CUSTOM RE?ORTl1 : ** EA 1 = OLD SCROLLS FERRY/MURRAY, BEAVERTON,OR AMERICAN p ILE 07!i4!87 REA 2 = OLD SCHOLLS FERRY/MURRAY, 3"' /VAI F,�s �' ►(.�, - 1992 ... 1992 BASE YEAR 1987 AREA 1 ROJECTIO AREA 2 PROJECTION ----------------------------------- :?RIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT 256 4880 SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS INDICATOR 87 ----- 80 csas=�ssasmzaaassa=acsc=ss=s==sssx= s==-=asc= sa=sssas=s --- cams .ac=sss=s- ? PUS T:503� 942 5838 23593 25702 1980 CENSUS 3662 19980 1970 CENSUS 1461 984: PERCENT CHANGE, 1970-1980 150. 7 103.0 PERCENT CHANGE, 1980-1987 35.0 18 . 1 -------------------------- --------- --------� ?OPULATION BY AGE 4942 58.6 23593 25702 % 0 - 5 9. 7 9 .0 8.7 8 . 2 % 6 - 13 -2.9 12.3 11 .9 11 .4 X 14 - 17 6.9 6. 1 6.4 5.8 % 18 - 24 11 . 8 11 .5 11 .2 10.6 % 25 - 34 13. 5 13 .4 15.4 14. 2 X 35 - 44 20. 2 16.6 18.8 17.2 % 45 - 54 12. 2 15. 8 11 .3 14.5 % 55 - 64 7. 5 8.2 7.6 8.2 % 65 + 5. 3 7. 1 8.6 9.9 ; *"FDIAN AGE TOTAL POPULATION 31 .5 33.3 32 .6 34 .8 DIAN AGE ADULT POPULATION 39.9 41 .8 40. 3 4 ----------------------- -------- ------ --------- ------ --- 11190 8 % HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES (ONLY) 58. 6 60.6 1980 % COLLEGE GRADUATES 34.9 29'0 980 MEDIAN SCHOOI, YEARS COMPLETED 14 .4 13 .8 V iN s3c�ams:IMATE 1697 059 8713 9727 S 3 7135 1970 CENSUS 425 3088 PERCENT CHANGE, 1970-1980 185.4 131 . 1 PERCENT CHANGE, 1980-1987 39.9 ------------------ --------- ---------- ------�- 1- --------- 11980 HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 3660: 19887* 1980 HOUSEHOLDS W/CHILDREN UNDER 18 640: 3257* :980 HOUSEHOLDS W/PERSONS OVER 65 98* 1052* 1980 AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE ----------------------------------- ------3 0* - 8 - ---------- ------ - ---------- 1987 HOUSEHOLD INCOME: % S 0 - $ 7,499 3.4 2.8 5.3 4.3 % $ 7,500 - $ 9,499 1 .5 1 .0 2 .4 1 .6 % $10,000 - S14,999 3.7 2.8 6. 1 4.4 % $15,000 - $24,999 10.8 7.9 15.7 11 . 7 % 525,000 - $34,999 16.6 10.8 19.7 14. 1 X $35,000 - S49,999 29. 2 21 .8 25 .4 22 .4 % $50,000 - S74,999 25. 2 29.2 18.7 24 .2 A $75,000 + 9.6 23.7 6.6 17.4 1. 1 . 0 RING: 1 .00 MILE($) : 45.4383 122 .8244 1 , 2. 0 RING: 2.00 MILE(S) : 45.4383 122.8244 * - INDICATES SUPPRESSION HAS OCCURRED. COPYRIGHT 1987 D.M.I.S. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED (800) 527 - DMZ$ ROM MUM EXISTING CONNERCIAL DEVELOPMENT The following chart demonstrates the statistics presented on page 5. Location Grocery Store SF Other Shops SF Howard's 10 ac. 40 ,000 70 ,000 Murray Hill 11 ac. 40 ,000 80 ,000 Tigard Thriftway 6 ac. 25 ,000 40 ,000 105 ,000 190 , 000 Volume Per Year/SF x $ 265 x 127 Total Volume: $52 million = $28 million + $24 million PROJECTED HOUSEHOLDS AT SATURATION DEVELOPMENT 48,384 households 12 . 6 sq . miles within 2 mile radius X 6 !!!! units/ac . x 640 acres. PROJECTED RETAIL EXPENDITURE $139 million 8713 households in year 1987 x $16 ,000/ household . $156 million = 9717 households in year 1992 x $16 ,000/ d household. $774 million 48 ,384 households at saturation development x ;16 , 000/ household. NORTH POINTE (KRUEGER SITE) Grocery Stores Other shops P 40,000 sq . ft. 123 ,000 sq ft. 15 acres shopping center X $265 X $127 Volume/sq. ft. /yr t million + million $26 million total volume rt f 6. 6 i �. COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS Goal 1. Develop a citizens involvement program that ensures the opportunity for citizens to get involved in all aspects of the planning process . COMMENT: Citizens involvement will occur with this application i by notifying to surrounding property owners and review by the local NPO group. Hearings will be available at both the Planning Commission and the City Council levels . The attached letter from NPO 7 the following page (Exhibit "G" ) , demonstrates NPO endorsement of this proposed shopping center. Goal 2. Establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all land use decisions and actions, and Insure a factual data base to substantiate those decisions and actions. COMMENT: The City of Tigard has an adequate process for all land use decisions and actions . An adequate factual base is presented In this case to ellow findings of fact to demonstrate approval of this zone change and comprehensive plan amendment application. Goals 3 and b. Agricultural and Forest lands do not apply in this case. i Goal 5. Conserve open space and protect natural and scenic resources. t COMMENT: All of the identified open space adjacent to the subject property will be preserved. i t 1 Goal 6. Maintain and improve the quality of air , water and land resources. t COMMENT: This zone change will have no effect on the quality of air, water, and land resources. The commercial development will be very similar to the existing 5 acre neighborhood shopping i center to the north. The only difference would be increased size and properly controlled traffic generation. However , this Increased traffic generation would be clearly offset by the reduced shopping trips to other shopping centers in the area such as Washington Square , King City, Howard's, Tigard Thriftway and Murray Hill . Goal 7. Protect the lives of community residents and property from natural hazard areas. 7 t z Aug. 25 14 so To: City of Tigard From: Richard Boberg Chairman, NPO 7 Subject: CG zoning in northwest Tigard At the June meeting of NPO 7 we :iscussed the possibility of siting a CG parcel umewhere near the intersection of Setiolls Ferry road and the Murray E extension. We feel that it would test serve the community if we were to decide now on a location for a future CG island that would meet the needs of the future residents of the area . The site of the present neighborhood commercial at the NW corner e the Kreuger parcel fronting on the Murray extension i needs to be considered again. We feel that it may need to be larger and the location considered carefully so that it fits best into the expanding neighborhood . It is very important that we make a long term coimittment to this area, and clearly designate } where the commercial development is to take place. I foresee many problems with infill commercial t develociment along the Scholls corridor if we do not address this issue st )n. +A r! L F E r r ' COMMENT: No natural hazard areas exist on the subject property except for local drainage ways. Goal 8. Meet the recreation needs of residents of the community , state and visitors. COMMENT: No effect on this goal will occur as a result of this application. Goal 9. Diversify and improve the economy of the community and the state. COMMENT: This 15 acre shopping center site will help improve and diversify the local economy of Tigard. Development of the site will provide employment and increased assessed valuation in the City of Tigard . Providing adequate opportunities for new businesses to locate in Tigard , creates more opportunities for local businessmen and the community. Goal 10. Provide adequate housing for the needs of the community, region and state. COMMENT: In the past, the City of Tigard had difficulties meeting the required LCDC vacant land housing density average of requirements 10 units per acre . Some housing opportunities have been removed from commercial zone changes such as the Albertsons Shopping Center at Durham Road and Pacific Highway. No additional residential re-zones to increase densities have occurred in the City of Tigard to make up for commercial re-zones. Further, some land zoned R-12 and R-25 has been developed with low density single family residential rather than multiple family housing such as Brittany Square 1 , 2 , and 3 , Winter Lake , Cotswald 1 , 2 , 3 , and 4 , and Ari-Green. All of these factors have contributed to reduced housing opportunities In the City of Tigard. The 101 housing units removed as a result of this commercial zone change will be replaced if the concurrent 43 acre zone change on the Citizen's Savings and Loan property is approved . As a result, no reduction to the overall average F housing density of 10 units per acre in the City of Tigard will occur or negative impacts to the City's Housing Goal . Goal 11. Plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as the framework for urban development. COMMENT: All public facilities and services have beenplanned to accommodate this development of the subject property. This zone x change will not cause any change to those plans. Goal 12. Provide and encourage a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system. / t ri 8 x i MENEMI �-^ COMMENT: Adequate plans have been submitted with this application demonstrating that adequate transportation facilities ffr have been planned for development of the property. This increase in development intensity would have no impact upon the capacity of the existing or proposed transportation system. Coal 13. Conserve energy. COMMENT: Providing adequate shopping oppo- -pities in close proximity to residential development will ... p conserve energy and reduce the use of gasoline resulting from residents driving long distances for their shopping needs . Goals in the Comprehensive Plan indicate the need to provide adequate shopping opportunities and commercial within close proximity of residential areas . Goal 14. Provide an orderly and efficient transition from urbanizable to urban land uses . COMMENT: Since the subject property is already designated urban , this goal does not apply. 9 S COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES General Commercial refers to automobile oriented and related licable commercial uses located along major traffic ways. The app zoning district is General Commercial (C-G) . Since the subject property is adjacent to a major thoroughfare , Scholls Ferry Road, and the proposed major thoroughfare, Murray Boulevard extension , rezone of the subject property from Multiple Family Residential to General Commercial , we feel , is appropriate . The previous Washington County Comprehensive Plan and the current Cit of Tigard Comprehensive Plan both indicate the need for a City g needs of the Neighborhood Commercial site to service the shopping residents in the area. The only difference with this application is the increase in size. Other alternative sites may be suitable , especially along Old Scholls Ferry Road. However , Beaverton Staff has determined there is no need for additional commercial sites along Old Scholls Ferry Road . Only one site may be as suitable compared to the subject 4 property. This site is located at the southeast corner of Scholls Ferry Road and 135th Avenue and known as the Grabhorn property. The major problems with the Grabhorn site are Increased traffic congestion, the potential of increased strip commercial development and the close proximity to Murray Hill and Howard's, resulting in overlapping shopping trips by the residents in the area . The Krueger property is more suited because of the geographic location and the triangulation effect by location south of the Old Scholls Ferry Road along Murray Boulevard. service not only the Bull Mountain , The Krueger property will dential developments on the west Summer Lake , and other new resi side of Tigard, but also the large football area designated multiple family at 25 units per acre between the two Scholls Ferry Roads , as shown by Exhibit "H" on the following page . 0 The population within this football area alone may approach 0 . Under normal circumstances , a population of 8 ,000 is necessary to service a 10 acre shopping center with a 40 ,000 square foot grocery store as an anchor. Projections in this report demonstrate a significantly higher population potential in the i area surrounding the subject property than the 8 ,000 population needed to support a 10 acre shopping center. This significant increase in population is demonstrated by the South Beaverton development projections, shown by Exhibit "I" . This information shows that within a one mile radius of the subject property , 7482 houses have been built, proposed or are under construction. This amount of houses will produce a population of about $20 ,000 people for an average density of 8 . 5 units per acre . 10 i f ,.:. ,...: ,.a_:. �,:.:. .:_ +gip-�::—...-:�__�.:. _ .S.Fekixi:��+,�-�.�"+:-.w:.•.:..-F/M.-....--+�-�-�+"•'q.r..s _ — .�ti.. �k r, LFA: ��■' .-111,111'^ ' • 1...� � _� t�Y i�`` min lull INTI/ fir:: � � �����'�• �2 �� � �"�r�'��� �� tj-.:ol i. "� � �I��/I� � /MNHM� ��1�11111��,7��1I ��! %:� � �t� ��. •■ f/� � � ' �' e.��.,,+�/�� �� � its i�: �! ��� s •:� �s.��!l�:.,.���''�� 1 ■' "'� :� :��� R/1111j 11 Biu NO:`�� ����i II►��\\� _ .,_I/SOF . '_ME��� �., 1■ IIID r�rU� :�1 �_�� ,_-.,,�- _ ` •••u. ■�t■Ir111 : � .:",� � 1 s evil + � �� ��—•■+'��� ������� ' 1•J,I�i i�� . -., sem. �, - rs ��111111■ �r�r� r 5fr,. r .. tire• •`1�-. � � • _ e �y 1. 111 •. �� � �� @�.�- 1 1 �• i x J : 1 ,t -r ;.y{, � P r;r y f+ '•cr+ i..�� � r ,+ r 1 i a t �;f � _� rn{,.�t'''�� �,' 1 3'�, iY�'�r J� �Y �'' i �:� �; ? .... . .-.r'�.+,'r'-.. . . . .�'.. ..•� .._ ..?' ..�t_.�'` •,f,;ri .'f. t.� +. .._,. _.1::�+ r.+�.-:�. ..��:�„ �3 ..'l. � .. 3,..'.r ,�_ _ m, :"r,._�..,1;_ .7t.'-x�.-.,...r J' ..>f!i. ' DEMONSTRATION OF POPULATION LEVEL TO SUPPORT A 4, $3996 annual household volume for grocery stores based upon Donnelley Marketing shown by Exhibit "F". X 2667 number of households based upon 8 ,000 people and average household size of 3 .00. $10,700,000 — Total annual volume for 8000 people divided by $265 Average annual volume per sq . ft. for supermarkets 40,000 sq. ft. supportable supermarket floor area for every 8000 people . 11 CID ELL n c' G o c � �. � Cis O'➢ti�. RD s ' Q umt ? ` LEAHY SVH q92 AD 9 otic ■ . IeAs it-/NYE ® 2 BARNES y � m +u ? �'Ftrq 5 z1 MERLO RD p � > a PATTON c • 44# 9Q �■e��m => I W HWY � • V� ■ � , wto p� MAMiLTO T.V. hw x H > r Aloha X ■■■"" �L X- .� 6 V.-HIL HWr. JG� a 6TN 5 H ■ara■cr ■>s �ti Fit) ' ¢ > P�I �Q yO Wron, o . VER ON > I K DA Vt ALLEN Ca BLVD ? o o I z ■l a MUL TNOMA DENNEY RD _PQ r BANY RD. • � ��—� ��� HA T a rn 0 C GARDEN HOMEI RD ( ' f W • r �� i R/GERT % e ¢ ! R � I 0 4 > BR KM m V� _ T yl RS FERRY R1 > m Y�O 2> KEI�IRE� ' NO R m = t i � t � � Cooper o I mIR .. MIR. W N 4 OAK ST N 'c `�uj � �- W > DAKOTA ST Cq PFAFFLE ,^* ST RD ■1®■®■ _ n ST SGHOLLS ��` WAL�� ST EN 3'BER ` RRUSE G ITY OF BEAVERTON FAN11 I! SOUTH MURRAY RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR ` 1 inch : 4600 feet SO H MXMy BLVD. RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR LOTS/UNITS ACES STATUS 5/15/87 ZONE Hart Meadoers SUB 1-85 16/ 3.4 R-5 Approval has lapsed 46/ 11.8 R-5 Project withdrawn, 2. Yale Park SUB 8-87 re-applied Westgate Investment Attn: R. Scott Smith 641-8830 Technical Engineering Attn: John DeJong 297-3721 Sexton Mt.n. PUD CUP 9-84, SUB 6-84 49/ Phase I 8.6 R-5 Approval has lapsed A. Sexton Mtn. village Apts. BSDR 57-84 /194 13 R-5 Approval has lapsed Regency Heights Apts. BSDR 9-85 /133 10 R-2 Construction • Lank-Link Investments R-5 completed 1985 9955 SE Washington #105 Portland, OR 97216 Attn: Jack Burgess 242-4088 1985 Sorrento SuwKit SUB 5-85 33/ 10 R-7 Completed 2 lots remaining Dave Edwards 4566 SW 103rd Beaverton, OR 97005 641-7400 9 R-5 Completed 1986 Sorrento Summit #2 SUB 4-85/9-85 33/ 8 lots remaining - Dave Edwards, Inc. 4566 SW 103rd Beaverton, OR 97005 641-7400 S. Sorrento Village BDR 44-82 20/ 3 R-5 Under construction (Wallton Place P.U.O.) Hank Dobaj/Grant Bennett A.I.A. 620-6960/248-1019 �. Sorrento Bluffs Apts. BSDR 8-84 /127 9.8 R-7 Construction completed 1985 Edwards Industries 6800 SW 105th Beaverton, OR 97005 643-8511 lO. Oobaj Heights SUB 2-85 21/ 4.8 R-5 Completed 1985 OR-AK Corp/Lutz Dev. Co. 13050 SW Forest Meadows Way Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Attn: Gordon Hobbs 635-4551 klm LOTS/LAIITS SFR/HRF # ACRES ZONE STATUS 5/15/87 Sorrento Ter. Mobile Ftrk BSDR 27-85 90/ is R-5 Project withdrawn Endicott Moods Apts. BSOR 36-85 /174 8.7 R-2 Completed 1986 Speer Development Co. 1620 N Carpenter Rd. Suite C-26 Modesto, CA 95351 209-527-7552 Lewiswood SUB 7-85 23/ 4.5 R-5 Preliminary plat • John Dejong 297-3722 approval lapsed Bishop's Ridge PLA CUP 8-85 115/335 total 60.0 R-5 Phase I: Completed 1986 Surridge Co./OTAK Phase 1 29/ 18 lots remaining { PO Box 1392 Phase 2 17/ Phase II: Completed 1987 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 13 lots remaining Phase 3 15/ Preliminary Plat approved Phase 4 17/ Preliminary Plat approved Phase 5 18/ Preliminary Plat approved Phase 6 12/ Not applied for Scholls LwWing BSOR 20-85 /444 Totnl 24.8 R-2 5.5- 2 Comprehensive Development /195 P. pse I 11.5 Completed, other phase not 11061 NE 62nd St., 0106 applied for Bellevue, WA 98004 p 206-454-9886 f Scholls ISO Apts. BSOR 10-86 /180 26.4 R-2 Project withdrawn 642-2537 Srholls Ferry Mobile Park BSOR 18-85 /158 26.4 Project withdrawn 7 1 Nurrsyhill 02 PLA 1050/525 227 R-5 Concept Plan Columbia-Willamette Dev./OTAK approval 920 SW Third Ave., 0300 Portland, OR 97204 J.O. Muyskens 228-1095 U8 Forestglen Village BSOR 18-83 /100 7 R-2 Phase I completed Western Senior Covoinities 1984 7412 SW Beaverton Hwy. /110 8 R-2 Phase 2 not applied Portland, OR 97225 297-1493 Sterling Pointe PLA BDR 19-06/CUP 17-M / R-5 C.S.L. Properties/OTAK /264 Phase I 17.2 R-2 Linder construction 1020 SW Taylor /196 Ph. 2 12.4 BDR approval Suite 555 /210 Ph. 3 13.9 Not applied yet Portland, OR 97205 248-1185 Cordon Davis '15:SOuTH mj=Y BLVD. RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR Page 2 of 4 ' LOTS/UNITS . SFR/MRF ACRES ZONE STATUS 5/15/87 Hurrayhill 01 P.U.D. CUP 15-86/SUB 12-86 550/640 total 123 R-5 Master Plan approved Wrraywoods Colurbie-5lillamette Dev./OTAK 49/ Phase 1 13.2 R-5 Preliminary Plat 920 SM Third Avenue, #300 Final plat approved Portland, OR 97204 Site work underway J.D. Muyskens 226-5611 Hurrayhill Apts. BDR 58-86 /204 10.2 R-5 BOR Approval Crow Western Co. OTAK 7/24/86 11400 SE 8th, 0235 Bellevue, CIA 98004 206-453-9030 Ann-Melissa Park SUB 6-86 21/ 4.5 R-5 Completed 1986 Maywood Co. Inc./Compass Eng. 3 lots remaining 1637 Laurel Street Lake Oswego, OR 97034 635-26'. Teon ra Acres SUB 11-66/RZ 9-86 31/ 6.4 R-5 Preliminary plat Alpha Engineering approved 1750 SA Skyline Blvd. Portland, OR 97221 297-1458 24. Hiteon Ridge SUB 7-86 Westmont Proprties/Alpha Eng. Ph,..,e 1 33/ 9. Completed 1986 6443 551 Beaverton Hwy. Phase 2 31/ 9. Pre. plat approved Portland, OR 97221 25 lots remaining 297-2560 V- Ashwood Dogs SUB 13-86 �� Mike Duncan Phase I 44/ 10.7 R-5 Completed 1987 2700 NM 185th Avenue Phase 2 38/ 9. R-5 Preliminary Plat Suite 2082 approved Portland, OR 97229 Hedlund Acres SUB 1-87 45/ 16.2 R-5 Final plat applied Gary Van Dyke test Star Dev. Corp. t 6600 SM 92nd #30 Portland, OR 97223 244-6924 . Sorrento Ridge 07 SUB 4-87 37/ 8.7 R-7 Final plat approved Dave Alexander Spectrum Development 111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1250 Portland, OR 97204 778-7600 t� E t5:SOUTH MURRAY BLVD. RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR i Page 3 of 4 i Vacant Lots in Subdivisions Platted Since 1980 (as of May 15, 1987) SUBDIVISION LOTS RNV MELISSA PARK 3 ASHWOOD DOWNS 44 BISHOPS RIDGE I 18 BISHOPS RIDGE II 13 FOREST GLEN IV 6 HITEON RIDGE 1 25 MURRAY !MOODS 49 SORRENTO RIDGE 6 5 SORRENTO SUMMIT 2 SORRENTO SUMMIT II 8 Total: 173 Lots 5/15/87 i includes all concept plans not yet lapsed. 2 includes vacant lots in subdivisions platted since 1980 O:ca 0315V ,0315:SOUTH MURRAY BLVD. RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR Page 4 of 4 t �3 { TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS SOUTH*MURRAY BLVD. RESIDENTIAL MIRRIDOR Residential Units: Single-Family/Multi-Family applied or approved: 1 1783/1696 = 3,479 1 site work u.c. or completed: 69/N/A = 69 building u.c. or completed: N/A/ 993 = 993 1852/2689 4,541 Units 3 OTHER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS Residential Units: Single-Family/Multi-Family applied or approved: 1 279/849 = 1128 site work u.c. or completed: 77/N/A = 77 building u.c. or completed: N/A/534 ■ 534 356/1383 = 1,739 Units f CITY MIOE QUM TOTALS Residential Units: Single-Family/Multi-Family s applied or approved: 1 2062/2545 = 4,607 site work u.c. or completed: 146/N/A = 146 i r building u.c. or completed: N/A/1527 = 1527 a 2208/4072 = 6,280 Units r _ I NOTE: Slight increases have occurred in almost all categories of unit counts since the last report of 11/17/86. Of special note is the huge jump in the South Murray single-family application total. This is due entirely by the Murrayhill 2 P.U.D. concept r' plan application. 5/15/87 - includes all concept plans not yet lapsed. Vacant lots in subdivisions are not Included in .any unit count. c 30:ca 0322V 0322V:OTHER RESIDENTIAL. DEVELOPMENTS Page 5 of 5 i R _ REQUIRED PLAN MAP AMENDMENT FINDINGS Quasi-judicial changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map may be Initiated by affected properties on a semi-annual basis and approved by the City Council based upon the following findings : 1 . The plan map change is consistent with applicable plan ^ policies . 2. A change of physical circumstances has occurred since the original designation, or 3. A mistake was made in the original land use designation. COMMENT: These plan map changes are consistent with all applicable plan policies . Additionally, a change in physical circumstances has occurred since the original designation of the 5 acre neighborhood commercial site . These changes include development of both single and multiple family housing at a much greater level than originally anticipated when the Comprehensive Plan was prepared in 1980 . New information presented in this report shows a clear need for a larger 15 acre commercial cite in order to properly accommodate the shopping needs of future { residents in the area. t 12 HOUSING FINDINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: ` The average net density in the City of Tigard is set at 10 units ir per acre. COMMENT: Residential housing units lost as a result of this Commercial Plan Amendment will be replaced after the Citizen's Savings and Loan zone change for the Summer Lake property is approved. ECONOMY FINDINGS: 1 . The economic climate of the City is subject to the influences of external economic forces beyond the control of the City. 2. The City continues to experience steady commercial growth despite the national and state economic situation . Economic data , particularly relating to sites available for development, Is largely unavailable or not kept up to date. COMMENT: The demand for commercial development stretches beyond the Tigard City limits. This demand is demonstrated by the market statistics contained in this report and the multiple requests for new commercial development along the Scholls Ferry Road corridor. Since the City does not have adequate data to demonstrate the amount of commercial land needed in the City, it can be assumed that the information provided in this report adequately demonstrates need for additional commercial land. ECONOMIC POLICIES POLICY 5.1 . 1: The City shall promote activities aimed at diversification of economic opportunities in Tigard with emphasis on growth of the local job market. Policy 5.1.4: The City shall insure that new commercial development will not encroach into residential areas. COMMENTS: Providing additional commercial land in the area will promote diversification and job opportunities in the City of Tigard. Since the subject property is largely undeveloped , designating the site Commercial will insure that future residential development will be planned and designed to be compatible with this future covimpr. cial shopping center. E. 13 LOCATIONAL CRITERIA: SECTION 12.2 of the Comprehensive Plan identifies 4 types of commercial development; Neighborhood , General , Professional , and Central Business District. The intent of the plan is to insure the following: 1 . Commercial areas be planned at a scale which relates its location, site and type of stores to the trade area to be served. 2 . Surrounding residential areas be protected from any possible adverse effects in terms of loss of privacy, noise , lights and glare. 3 . Commercial centers and uses be aesthetically attractive and landscaped. 4. Ingress and egress points not to create traffic congestion or hazards. 5 . Vehicle trips be reduced both in terms of the length of vehicle trip and total number of trips. 6 . The central business district is not included in the locational criteria because there is only one designated area. COMMENTS: This proposed commercial zone change application complies with all of the above intents of the Comprehensive Plan. POLICY 12.2.1 , THE CITY SHALL: A. Provide for commercial development based on the type of use , its size and required trade area. B. Apply D11 applicable plan policies . C. Apply the appropriate locational criteria applicable to the scale of the project. COMMENT: All of the above policies have been demonstrated in this report. - GENERAL COMMERCIAL LOCATIONAL CRITERIA General Commercial areas are intended to provide for major retail goods and services . The uses classified as general commercial may involve drive—in services, large space users , a combination of retail , service , wholesale and repair services or provide services to the traveling public . The uses range from automobile repair and services , supply and equipment stores , vehicle sales , 14 drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments. It is intended that these uses be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. A. Scale (1) Trade Area. Varies (2) Site Size. Depends on Development. (3) Gross Leasable Area. Varies . B. Locational Criteria ( 1) Spacing and Location a. The commercial area is not surrounded by residential districts on more than two sides. ( 2) Access a. The proposed area or expansion of an existing area shall not create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. Such a determination shall be based # on street capacity, existing and projected traffic volumes, speed limit, number of turning movements , and traffic generating character- istics of various types of uses . b. The site shall have direct access from a major collector or arterial street . C. Public transportation shall be available to the site or in the general area. (3) Site Characteristics a . The site shall be of a size which can accommodate present and projected uses. b. The site shall have high visibility. (4) Impact Assessment a. The scale of the project shall be compatible with the surrounding uses. b. The site configuration and characteristics shall be such that the privacy of adjacent non-commercial uses can be maintained . 15 ME c . It shall be possible to incorporate the unique site hfeatures into the site design and development plan. d. The associated lights , noise and activities shall not interfere with adjoining non-residential uses. COMMENTS: This proposed 15 acre commercial site will provide for i ' Intended uses identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not identify standards for trade area, size, or gross leasable area. Then factors determined when specific applications are submitted. The locational criteria limits General Commercial sites where residential districts are located on 2 sides. In this specific case , Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard provide adequate separation on 2 of the sides and future residential development would only be located on the south and eastern portions of the site. Both of these adjacent residential areas are zoned for multiple family development which is a very compatible adjacent land use to commercial development. Access to this site shall be from a major collector arterial street and no traffic congestion or traffic and safety problems will occur as demonstrated by the extensive traffic engineering in the area . Public transportation is available along Scholls _ Ferry Roa:l. The subject property has high visibility and is adequate in size to accommodate the commercial shopping needs of the area . This project is within scale of existing development in the area and adequate buffers and other separations can be developed to insure compatibility with the existing and proposed residential development. Development of the area is anticipated to occur at a rapid pace In the near future . This fact is demonstrated by the proposed National Self Service Storage development at the intersection of Old Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard . Other developments s Include the Chalford Subdivision on the south west corner of the Murray extension and 135th Avenue and the Sherston Subdivision at l the current 5 acre neighborhood Commercial site as shown by the attached aerial photograph ( Exhibit ' B") . These proposed developments, to occur next year in 1988 , will significantly contribute toward full construction of the Murray Boulevard _. Extension. wp7.krueger. 510 rev. 9-21-87 16 , W 2 �� '�'Q-►d1.�q.��.�5 �Sc �+.2 �.�,�\�p r u�c� 0.J Q ctA cr� 2.ort c v�v,2 ZC Zo �RMC� � V1�1�T'J 11-t 3� S� 1�1� �.TU►J I�J� ,� 117511 5 LJ c,)r l Zzsr+ 4v e-- G►. claw- Ems' Nej Fry 1 • •e. ' �v� 11 7S� ,SGS MD/n��5 �//l �2 -�-•���--" 1h1l PL's 1 Alp - A��,s bU �N'• ailsw ryro,u� 3105 .5 W , �S hb U' �u'��! W LA01X3527 5� �ll� c,� 2 KtY 1 3S.Z) S.u).�L�Llo�c�i �9 . •i ,,b[�nJa "Id C_ tvlm 5w 'ZS !✓�/Q - t-(,� '� /! 7�d• J r� Sc,�-�,�J-ate �- p f�- ,.��LVy�ei._ r-� ' b - - ,Ay..;_-�. v� :,�� C--QHS o F .fie,Q y�Yo -olQ , oV-eose zcve cLav`je- )R- 2`S A-c, C-G C Gev\� CjNq\o\R-r6za) 0.v\L o-�f Ic,,Je- o-F 1• ,PDY��1F�' //��S��ri dr���To�ASC i��.�J �' x� �� 4CG3�•C. V L C 4. Pn ('Ck' J �u2� � � ► L � Ur— ,Vb 2 ('S VQU/U i>. ILgC�r�(��i j O'lC) 71�, UJ SU; y,�� ✓T./ � �.sir .�1� d /' ' � qtr 7j j 5,0-,, jLis � }. -`r�.lz� S S w 1 ca-ti J t YC� 1/ 7 63 5 w. 5.,.�.,v�•-, �� 7 r 9a� / . -�--«--G -17 l ZS . 25 �`� �32DHt Ft:t Y l n G K{► _ L l Q�r`-f ��'1Z,s'T U` �f7w� �"'. f -Lis Lis or ;MPSI k , h ; 13C, tis C5 Q- O o f it F-Z S- 'c,' 7 G c G e„'¢rc& C��nn,+�Q r���' �J�� apfvJe tA C\-av� 2 e- ld d '�R wy+U Sit�wa � te Cl- - of c'rr //ls a -0,6c) / 7c"1-Z sw Sr,�vt o�a�c ,-> �tc� tt 7�Ob' SISI SWC4,1d,c� tp i3(o 7 r tri - L,Y) T1.ci 5�c1, �7ZZ 38• 1 �Cv iv rr:,r/ l`c.'y L� � o���ct73. 3, . l 5�L .5 IJ U n. y Ltd ly Titer, .J J U4• �g y-q I I; I Z -3 `1 S ,, F-r, ccv�f � 2cuG�'1 0''- >rn t^Q r 9 FC' _,r VIM/. Diwlar'�to 1�to s to A'jlbuvy�- q""�' rv�[�r i 1 :3211i IS I t s i i 1 11 11 11 i I' CITY OF TIGARD., OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 2 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: October 22, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: -CPA 87-07/ZC 87-2-1 PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission Citizens recommendation for denial PREPARED BY: Keith Liden TED BY: DEPT HEAD OK ('=17P7T�JITY M5?:r.N OK REQUESTED POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The applicant has requested a comprehensive plan change from R-4.5 (PD) to R-7 on 43 .26 acres in the vicinity of Summer Lake Park. Staff reviewed the request grid recommended approval. On October 6, 1987 the Planning Commission reviewed the above applicatio", and recommended denial. Since the hearing comments have been received from the Park Board and a petition was submitted by residents on 128th Avenue requesting that no northerly extension of the street be permitted. Attached is an ordinance, a copy of the staff report, the applicant's submittal, Commission minutes, Park Board review, neighborhood petition and staff response, and a letter from the Tigard School District. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1 . Hold a public hearing to consider the application and approve the request as recommended by staff. 2. Hold a public hearing to consider the application and Deny the request as recommended by Planning Commission. FISCAL. IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Hold a public hearing to consider the application and approve the request and adopt the attached ordinance. cs/1468D im 11 ii i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON .- ORDINANCE NO. 87— AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 87-07) AND ZONE CHANGE ("LC 87-21) PROPOSED BY CITIZENS SAVINGS AND LOAN. WHEREAS, the applicant requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and a Zone Change from R-4.5 (PD) to R-7; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard the above application at its regular meeting of October 6, 1987 and recommended denial; WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council heard the above application at its regular meeting of November 2, 1987 to consider the Commission recom,mundatiun; WHEREAS, based upon the record in this carie from the Planning Commission and City Council hearings, the Council makes the following findings in this matter; NOW, THERE:FORL, BE. 1:1 RESOLVED by the 'figard City Council that:: Section 1 : The proposal is consistent with all rolevant criteria discu:it;od in the October 6, 1987, Planning staff report to Planning Commission (E=xhibit "A") . ( Sect-ion 2: The City Council reverses the PIannirig Commission's recommendation for denial of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendment as set for the in Exhibil. "B" (map) . Section 3: The Council, therefore ORDERS that the above referenced re, —st be, and the same hereby is, APPROVED. PASSED: By v vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of November, 1937. Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder — City of Tigard cs/1468D ORDINANCE NO. 87— Page 1 FT 3 �-� STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.2 I/ I// October 6, 1987 — 7:30 P.M. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION TIGARD CITY HALL — TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: CPA 87-07 and ZC 87-21 Citizens Savings and Loan REQUEST: A request for approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment from low density residential to medium density residential and a zone change request from R-4.5 (PD) (low density, residential, 4.5 units/acre, planned development) to R-7 (PD) medium density residential, 7 units/acre, planned development) on 43.26 acres. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5 (PD) APPLICANT: Ryan O'Brien OWNER: Citizens Savings & Loan Land Development Consultants 450 Kruse Way #370 209 NE Lincoln Avenue Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Hillsboro, OR 97124 LOCATION: South of Summer Lake Park, east of SW 130th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 33DD Lot 100) 2. Background Information On August 25, 1976, the Summer Lake site was annexed to the City of Tigard and a zone change approval subsequently changed the zoning from Washington County RS-1 to Tigard R-7 (PD). A proposal for Summer Lake subdivision was submitted in 1977 and approved in March 1978 (ORD 78-19) (ZC 28-77). The site originally contained 103.14 acres. The proposed development was to have been built in four major phases over a period of five to seven years. Phases IA and .IB have been completed and consist of all of the lots north of Summer Creek known as Amart Summer Lake. Phases IIA and IIB were never constructed but 160 single family detached residential units were planned for these latter phases located on the subject property. The plan envisioned a greenway/open space area where the drainageway exists on tax lot 100. 3. Vicinity Information Summer Lake Park is located on the north side of Summer Creek and is also zoned R-4.5 (PD). Properties north and northeast of the park are zoned R-7 (PD) (Single Family Residential, medium density, 7 units/acre, Planned Development). Properties to the south and east are zoned and developed STAFF REPORT — CPA 87-07 and ZC 87-21 — PAGE 1 ISM i R-4.5. The Mary Woodward Elementary School abuts the subject parcel on its southeastern end. Fifteen properties to the west along the north side Arl of SW Falcon Rise Drive are zoned and developed R-7. The Brittany Square and Winter Lake subdivisions to the west are zoned R-12 (PD) (Multi-family Residential, 12 units/acre, Planned Development) but they were developed with single family residences. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description With the exception of two single family residences on separate tax lots on the western side of this parcel, the remaining portion is vacant and covered with grasses and a few trees. The topography is such that the parcel slopes downward to the north towards Summer Creek. The applicant wishes to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Low to Medium Density Residential and the zoning designation from R-4.5 (PD) to R-7. 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Washington County Fire District No. 1 and the City Building Inspection Division have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. The Beaverton School District has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments: A zone change that would allow 48 additional lots would generate an additional 25 school-age children for the Beaverton School District. If the property were developed with 108 extra lots, we would anticipate 56 additional school-age students. The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments: a. Streets The proposed density increase would allow an additional 108 residential units. These additional units would be expected to generate an additional 1,100 vehicles trips per day, meaning approximately 110 additional trips during the peak hour. Access is via several streets — Brittany Drive, Falcon Rise Drive, 128th Avenue, Katherine Street, and (in the future) SW 130th Avenue. When adjoining areas are fully developed SW 130th Avenue would probably provide the primary access route to this area. The street system has adequate capacity to accommodate the added traffic from the proposed higher density. However, the increased traffic volumes may not be acceptable to residents of the adjoining subdivisions. All of the streets providing access to the site have been developed as residential streets with direct driveway access. We have heard numerous complaints this summer of increased traffic and speeding on Katherine Street and on 128th Avenue as a result of recent housing construction in the area. i STAFF REPORT - CPA 87-07 and ZC 87-21 - PAGE 2 $t i T 1 b. Utilities 4 Storm drainage for the area will go to Summer Creek. The Summer Creek trunk line provides sanitary sewer service to the site. Utility capacity is not a concern. C. Sanitary Sewer This site drains to a ten inch sewer that drains to the Scholls Trunk. About another 91 acres further up stream also drains to this line. The combined flows from these two areas are shown on the attached. The peak 0.80 cfs could be comfortably handled by the ten inch line. However, I would recommend that the developer be required to show that the ten inch line is adequate. The zone change should not be objected to on the basis of sanitary sewer availability. d. Conclusions The streets and utilities are adequate to serve the proposed increased residential density. However, there will be impacts in the form of increased traffic on existing residential streets in adjoining subdivision. NOTE: Approval of the zone change request will not mean approval of the street plan shown in the application. Subdivision approval will also be required and the street plan may be changed. Review of the specific street plan will not occur until formal application is made '• for a preliminary subdivision approval. No other comments were received. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant approval criteria in this case are Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1. 1, 6.1.1, 6.3.2, 6.4.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and the locational criteria in Chapter 12. Since our Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged by the State, an analysis for the proposal's consistency with the 19 statewide land use planning goals is not necessary. The Planning staff concludes that the above criteria are satisfied based upon the following findings: 1. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the NPO has been informed and given an opportunity to comment and notice of the public hearing has been sent to surrounding property owners. 2. Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied because the proposed rezoning would provide for a diversity of housing densities and residential types. 3. Policy 6.3.2 is satisfied because the provision of an adequate density transition area adjacent to existing lower density development will be possible. l STAFF REPORT — CPA 87-07 and ZC 87-21 — PAGE 3 4. Policy 6.4.1 is satisfied because the property has been designated to be in a "developing area" on the Comprehensive Plan map. The higher density R-7 zoning designation would allow for a greater range of outright permitted uses and the planned development overlay would allow for more efficient use of the land by establishing a lower minimum lot size. 5. The Engineering Division has indicated that existing street, sewer, and utility facilities have the capacity for additional development. Therefore, policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 are satisfied. the property is also within one—half mile of existing public transportation. This proposal will eliminate the planned development overlay. The planned development overlay would enhance the ability of the applicant to transfer density under the provisions of Section 18.92.030 and create adequate buffering. Staff recommends retaining the planned development overlay. 6. Policy 8.1. 1 is satisfied because once this proposal has been developed several streets for access will be available. The development will not concentrate traffic on any one street but it will be diffused among several local streets. When adjoining areas are fully developed, SW 130th Avenue will probably provide the primary access route to this area. E 7. Staff researched the average size of surrounding subdivision lots closest to this property. The following summarizes the results of { this research: Subdivision Zoning i Summer Lake R-7 (PD) Average 5,550+ South side of Glacier Lily Winter Lake R-12 (PD) 5,000-9,568 sq. ft. e SW Shore Drive of 29 lots, 6,000 sq. ft. average E SW 134th Terrace t t Brittany Square No. II R-12 (PD) 5,000-9,049 sq. ft. F South side of SW Sheffield of 34 lots, 5,642 sq. ft. average Circle Brittany Square No. III R-12 (PD) 4,641-8,361 sq. ft. SW Winter Lake and of it lots, 6,196 sq. ft. average i SW Brittany Drive.. Bellwood No. II R-4.5 Majority are 7,500 sq. ft. SW Katherine Street, East of SW 128th 4 Village at Summer Lake Park R-12 (PD) 5,400-11,939 sq. ft. SW Tamera and of 41 lots, 6,966 sq. ft. average SW Laurmont Drive t I i E STAFF REPORT — CPA 87-07 and ZC 87-21 — PAGE 4 r Ari Green 5,000-12,092 sq. ft. South side of Shore Drive of 33 lots, 6,124 sq. ft. average and SW Laurmont Court Staff concludes the zoning will be comparable with that of surrounding built subdivisions and with those which have not yet been constructed but have been approved by the City. In addition, the site will automatically provide buffering because of the Summer Creek floodplain to the north and northeast, the drainageway which will bisect the development, and the Mary Woodward School to the southeast. 7. The locational criteria are satisfied because the property is not committed to low density development. The site is presently vacant and has been designated on the "buildable lands inventory map" yrs buildable. Available streets are not limited to local streets and collector-s. The property has direct access to a collector street (SW 13Ot-h and SW 128th Avenues) and indirect access to an arterial (SW Scholls Ferry Road). The property does not have any development limitations other than a small insignificant drainageway which traverses the property. Topography, flooding, and poor drainage should not affect any development if reviewed by the City to meet criteria pertaining to these limitations. C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval of CPA 87-07 and ZC 87-21 to City Council, subject to the condition that the planned development overlay be retained for the entire site. 'til-E& P ARED BY: Deborah '9-. tuart APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan Assistant Planner Director of Community Development (cs/1114D) E STAFF REPORT — CPA 87-07 and ZC 67-21 — PAGE 5 i t i 'yi ;� ..r• s t`1 C,. .T: K a: • . j �1 4 �► • ■■\��,.. !� �Illllllllll �1�1 1N/ 'r -,, MIN� IIiI�N! ■■■■ ; ■■+ ■ r � 1�.�� ■nab� MARY `. i ./usages ELEMENTARYSCHOOL ' �■1■■111. /�� r i�' �c► a i��r ©i■■ngHim MENNEN WON pp Ppv- . 1 + � 7 f f : . ��■ � �i�. ..■■ ��II� — ells ■ 5 :a• s Y..f '. , t L A N D D E V E L O P M E N T C O M S U L T A M T S 209 N.E. Lincoln Ave. , Suite "B" Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 (503) 648-4061 Bob Oquist, PLS George Wilhelm, PE Ryan O'Brien, Plrnner Joe Thompson, Project Mgr. August 25 , 1987 REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Re-zone of the Southerly Phase of the Summer Lake Development from it-4 . 5(PD) to R-7(PD) and Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential . APPLICANT: Ryan O'Brien, of Land Development Consultants. PROPERTY OWNERS: Citizens Savings and Loan. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tax Lot 100 , Map 1S1-33DD. SIZE: 43.26 acres. LOCATION: 1/2 mile south of Scholls Ferry Road , 1/2 mile west of 135th Avenue, and directly south of Summer Lake Park. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Citizens Savings and Loan, the current owners , recently obtained the subject property from the original developers of Summer Lake. An analysis of the subject property and the strategic location demonstrates that R-7 zoning is more appropriate for the subject property than R-4.5. This is especially true since all of the properties to the north and west are developed with lots 5 ,000 square feet and larger. As demonstrated by other developments in the Cities of Tigard and Beaverton, providing variety of lot sizes is very important to meet the housing needs of future homeowners locating in Tigard. An R-7 zoning would provide this development flexibility. Purchase inquiries demonstrate that most developers are interested In providing variable lot sizes ranging from 5,000 to 8,000 square feet in area, rather than just 7, 500 square foot lots. This application has also been submitted to offset housing density lost from a concurrent 10 acre re-zone of multiple family land on the Marge Krueger property. This residential re-zone would increase density from 4.5 to 7 units per acre , with a net increase of 2.5 units per acre or 108 units. These additional units are necessary, to maintain an average density of 10 units per acre for vacant residential land. • 1 The following table demonstrates this fact: 108 unit increase = 43.26 acres X 2 .5 units per acre resulting - from re-zone from R-4. 5 to R-7. 101 Number of units needed to make up residential units lost from the Krueger commercial re-zone. CONCLUSION: The 108 unit increase from this proposed zone change will replace the 101 units lost from the Krueger re-zone leaving a resulting vacant residential density in the City of Tigard of 10 units per acre. SURROUNDING LAND USE Property to the north is zoned R-7 and developed with previous phases of the Summer Lake Subdivision. A large water body provides a physical barrier between the subject property and the Summer Lake development to the north. Property to the east is zoned R-4. 5 and contains wetlands, vacant land with mature fir trees, and the Mary Woodward Elementary School . Property to the south to zoned R-4.5 and developed with single family residential houses. Property to the west is zoned R-7 and R-12 and developed with single family residential houses on 5,000 to 7 ,000 square foot lots. Development of the subject property will provide a circulation pattern 'similar to the attached potential master plan originally submitted with the Winter Lake Subdivision in 1980 . This circulation pattern provides loop streets and access northerly to 130th with potential extension to Scholls Perry Road. COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS Goal 1. Develop a citizens involvement program that ensures the opportunity for citizens to get involved in all aspects of the planning process. COMMENT: Citizens involvement will occur with this application by notification to surrounding property owners and review by the local NPO group. Hearings will be available at both the Planning Commission and City Council levels. Goal 2. Establish a land use planning process and policy; framework as a basis for all land use decisions and actions, and ( insure a factual data base to substantiate those decisions and actions. COMMENT: The City of Tigard has an adequate process for all land use decisions and actions. An adequate factual base is presented 2 in this case to allow findings of fact to demonstrate approval of this zone change and comprehensive plan amendment application. Goals 3 and 4. Agricultural and Forest lands do not apply in this case. Goal 5. Conserve open space and protect natural and scenic resources. COMMENT: All of the identified open space adjacent to the subject property will be preserved. Goal 6. Maintain and improve the quality of air, water and land resources. COMMENT: This zone change will have no effect on the quality of air, water and land resources. Identical development will occur on the subject property if R-4 . 5 zoning remains . The difference with R-7 zoning would be a slight increase in density. Assuming 25% of the property will be used for public streets, the balance will equal 32 . 45 acres or 1 , 413, 522 square feet. Although a few lots may be 5,000 square feet, the average will probably range from - 6,500 to 7 ,000 square feet creating about 217 to 236 lots. This is a slight increase of the current potential of 188 lots based upon 7500 square foot lots. Since there is a good supply of 5,000 square foot lots in the City of Tigard, a need exists for slightly larger lots . This is especially true along the frontage of Summer Lake where lots will probably exceed 7 ,000 to 8 ,000 square feet. This provides compatibility lwith property eand roreto the north and good marketing opportunities expensive single family homes. A break down of potential average lot sizes and resulting total number of units as a result of this zone change and Comprehensive Plan Amendment are as follows: Average Lot Size in Sq.Ft. Total Number of Units 7500 188 7000 202 6500 217 6000 236 5500 257 5000 283 Gaul 7. Protect the lives of property and community residents from natural hazard areas. ? COMMENT: The only natural hazard on the subject property is the 100 year flood plain. No development within this 100 year flood plain will occur. 3 CM Goal 8. Meet the recreation needs of residents of the community, state and visitors. COMMENT: No effect on this goal will occur as a result of this application other than increased density to allow more residences direct access to Summer Lake Park and future recreational facilities. No additional recreational facilities are necessary as a result of this application. Goal 9. Diversify and improve the economy of the community and the state. COMMENT: No impact to this goal will occur as a result of this application other than more construction employment and future Increased retail sales. Goal 10. Provide adequate housing for the needs of the community, region and state. COMMENT: In the past, the City of Tigard has experienced difficulty meeting required the LCDC vacant land housing density average requirement of 10 units per acre. Some housing opportunities have been removed by commercial zone changes such as the Albertsons Shopping Center at Durham Road and Pacific Highway. No additional residential re-zones to increase densities have occurred in the City of Tigard to make up for commercial re-zones . Further, some land zoned R-12 and R-25 has been developed with low density single family residential housing rather than multiple family. All of these factors have contributed to reduced housing opportunities in the City of Tigard. Therefore, re-zone of the subject property will allow Increased housing opportunities in the City of Tigard without Impact to existing development. Most property around the subject is zoned R-7 or R-12. Property zoned and developed with R-4. 5 densities are located along the south property .line. If compatibility is necessary, then this southerly area can be limited to 7500 square foot lots. Goal 11. Plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as the framework for urban development. An am COMMENT: All public facilities and services have been planned to accommodate development of the subject property. This zone change will not cause any change to those plans. Goal 12. Provide and encourage a safe, convenient, and 4 economical transportation system. COMMENT: Adequate plans have been submitted with this application demonstrating that adequate transportation facilities have been planned to accommodate increased density on the subject property. Goal 13. Conserve energy. COMMENT: Increased density always conserves energy by providing more efficient use of urban services and scarce urban land. The same amount of utilities and streets are necessary to serve a 5 ,000 square foot lots compared to 7 , 500 square foot lots. Goal 14. Provide an orderly and efficient transition from urbanizable to urban land uses. COMMENT: Since the subject property is already designated urban, this goal does not apply. ( COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES Low density residential includes development from i to 5 units per net acre and R-1 to R-4.5 zoning. Medium density residential h includes 6 to 12 units per net acre and R-7 to R-12 zoning. Since this application is a re-zone from R-4 . 5 to R-7 , there is also a need to request a Comprehensive Plan Map change from low density to medium density residential . All policies which apply to low and medium residential densities are applicable to this case. Quasi-judicial changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map may be initiated by affected parties on a semi-annual basis and approved by the City Council based upon the following findings : } 1 . The plan map change is consistent with applicable plan policies , 3 2. A change of physical circumstances has occurred since the original designation, or ` 3. A mistake was made in the original land use designation. E COMMENTS: This Comprehensive Plan Map change is consistent with all applicable plan policies. Physical changes in the area have occurred since the original comprehensive plan was prepared. One change includes development of a large number of 5,000 square foot lots along the full length of the west side of the subject property. Other changes include the high price of housing in the City of Tigard and the significant popularity of lots smaller than 7500 square feet. There is still a need for 7 ,500 square f foot lots in the City of Tigard, however, the demand is less t compared to 6 ,000 to 6 ,500 square foot lots. This fact is i I c 5 i . . 1 i' a demonstrated by the slow sales of the larger lots in the Summer Lake Subdivision to the north. I-f all of the subject property was developed with 7 ,500 square foot lots, risk of foreclosure would significantly increase. Therefore , it is in the best interest of the City of Tigard to provide future developers maximum flexibility to provide a mixture of lot sizes to protect their investment and to provide subdivision lots more in keeping with house size,, personal tastes , and incomes of future home buyers. A visual review of the zoning map shows a large percentage of vacant single family land zoned R-4. 5. Only a small portion is zoned R-7 . The only other large blocks of R-7 land, other than the area adjacent to the subject property, are located on the east side of Hall Boulevard, north of Dorburn Place and the Summerfield area. These facts demonstrate a greater need for additional R-7 land in the City of Tigard than retaining R-4 . 5 zoning on the subject property. HOUSING FINDINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1 . The average net density in the City is 10 units per acre . 2. Rapid increase in housing and land costs over the last several years has excluded many households from suitable housing to meet their needs. 3 . The rapidly changing housing market will require the City to periodically re-evaluate its housing and land use objectives to provide a variety of housing types and densities to meet the needs of future residents. The City bousing policies are as follows: The City shall provide an opportunity for diversity of housing densities and residential types at various price and rent levels . Housing cost findings are as follows: 1. Many factors have caused the average sales price of new single family houses to increase from 22, 700 in 1970, to over 76 ,000 in 1980. (The current average house price in Tigard is probably in excess of $85,000. ) i 2. Land and regulation costs have dramatically increased the cost of development. 3. Construction costs may be reduced by building smaller units 6 and using alternative construction techniques . COMMENTS: This proposed rezone will provide opportunities for smaller lots, housing affordability and housing variety. Further, this rezone will help the City maintain an overall average density of 10 units per acre. Established residential area findings are as follows: 1 . A major community concern is viability of established residential areas and effects from growth. Many existing residential areas border large tracts of vacant, undeveloped land. 2. Adequate development standards are necessary to retain the character of these adjacent existing areas and minimize adverse impacts. POLICY 6.3.1 requires new development in established areas to be the same type and density to protect the character of existing neighborhoods. POLICY 6.3.2 requires a transition along boundaries of increased densities to limit density within 100 feet of developed areas to a maximum 25Z increase compared to adjacent lower density areas , unless there is an intervening road such as a major collector or arterial street. COMMENT: The only area where this policy would be applicable would be along the south boundary and the southwest corner adjacent to the Morning Hill Subdivision. In these areas, the lots would be limited to 6 ,000 square feet, a 25% increase over 7,500 square foot lots. SECTION 12.1 of the Comprehensive Plan requires residential housing types to he determined by locational criteria, allowed densities and Community Development Code provisions related to each zoning district. Low density residential areas are committed to low density development and not shown on the buildable lands inventory as vacant land. The street facilities are limited to collector and local streets and sometimes have development limitations due to topography, soil characteristics , drainage , high water table or flooding. These areas have limited capacity for development in terms of sewer, water, drainage, schools , police , fire , and health. 7 ' The following factors determine the density ranges of low density residential areas: 17. The area has been historically developed with large lots which are determined to be committed land on the buildable lands Inventory and the zoning is consistent with existing development patterns. 2. The capacity of public facilities and services. 3. Areas within walking distance of transit should be zoned for smaller lots. 4 . Areas within close proximity to jobs, commercial areas and public facilities and services should be zoned for smaller lots. COMMENTS: The above definitions show that the subject property Is not low density land. It is not committed to low density development and identified on the buildable lands inventory as vacant. Although direct access to the property is through local collector streets, there is direct access to Scholls Ferry Road , a major arterial street. The area has limitations due to flood plains, however, no development will occur within the flood plain area. The slope of the property can easily accommodate lots as small as 5 ,000 square feet. Since this is a newly developed area, an adequate supply of public facilities and services, Including future recreation facilities, are available in the area. An elementary school is located adjacent to the site. The factors which determine a medius density designation are as follows: 1 . The areas are not committed to low density development. 2. The areas have direct access from collector or arterial streets. 3. The areas are not subject to development limitations. 4. Adequate public facilities are available. 5. The area is within 1/2 mile of public transportation. b. The area can be buffered from low density residential areas In order to maximize the privacy of established low density areas. i The following factors are used to determine the density ranges allowed in medium density areas: 1 . The density of development in areas historically zoned for medium density development. 8 2. Topography, natural features, and potential for buffering established low density areas. 3. Capacity of services and distance to public transit. 4. Distance to commercial centars and public open space. COMMENT: The subject property is developed with an adequate collector transportation system with access to fully improved arterial streets. No developmental limitations exist on the property, and public transit is located within 1/2 mile along Scholls Ferry Road. Adequate buffering or increase of lot sizes to a minimum of 6,000 to 7500 square feet can occur along the south property line to Insure compatibility with existing neighborhoods. Based upon all of these factors, the subject property is more in keeping with a medium density designation compared to low density. wp7.summer. 425 9 IL+ T.L. .-°00 !� T.1... 200 ON 1. LVINIM )lr- •, i � •��1 „ ` a:-~� jam. �''" �'• ,:� s.'' r` t s0 i I A.�IeTMC�t't 1 � 41Y Limrrs ° SAYE w o .rsseoos o.�sso �i�►oo.ro Gil-CA-yLA' C*l r=L.^.� �p $ �• ®® { 1-40 4a. �ry A f Y� h '•t.'6 '�?a'4•.IS. ■■■■■■� ■■■■■. �'r �� ririrll�; r■ ♦0`_.. 1 •� . F T. ■ �\��s'„■ �*t. � _• a ms's !1• �4���-Illi «�°t..,. �11ItI�11� ti: 1■1>s Q=� ■ � � .I��■r„ O\- �Ri�'1l1�1 ;� S►� - 1►i�♦ ..,A ri ■list■■axe,SO 1*41 man -■.��: �►.,. �.� ���� — � �iy:,- �► Bill :/r���n ��� ��1 Iq■f tn■f t■��\Iflf�fff� ::>3:-�- " � '•f err'. �ffffi■H1��'�� ►����"=1low 11111w11111 r IP Ate,�� r ► � Ii1si � anigivillime fit!■ff� �� �:.1►„• '�� ME r. � ►Q��• ria f l� w s �, �� �1� iriiilrxi== as tlWO � s �■.'!.•� mow- GINNIE id i`�f/ "r :t%i�a���'► II/1111111�t/�11� ��a IN NAIL J d lljl11111��C...�� rt\►�� �� �s4..■M.� flM■.■.o■ ■`r.�u■ �� ' � ` � dl► rrM►���f��/�I� �f■ Arai t I�It11 s,•�� .; �•■��*rritUt• ��1 11 �I�111111` !�■ . NUL `• MIND -' Roll UNION .�' /%!' ' � Vit ■/r 0 -�_fir. . �, ,���.:; � �/���/� •� ♦��� • ■,� t; ` �1i�1� .� ������I�_ If��l ♦ �//1111■ ��. :,��������i�rr . ;: +.11111 c'3 w ��,f �► OP JIM .V I/Lir `� � - � ,.�■ _�•,:�: iiir�iii�� ■■■■ 'sSU111141I�i1 �' �11�4�1 111 si .ifi► ..■. 4trf1rt�i�� /R� •sten SAW IN F t11 If�w11/1 r .�" r •r + • ��r.a:■.f■ rri� Alf/■'C r• a r.. rir NOWWw Jim mom Iry " *'•- • 1 / �■ .-J'affs Ing gul a all VA `' '{ ■sir►� ■ li` i r . E OM all IML ME ( - r t "� !r t ,f �•" . '!cY �� s'ar�., '��. it ,` ' y t ! a � "`n J } X a � r. In :+ 1 � •+}• ^I`�. Ty r ~ k � z � �•'�,tel�' +. syr ♦ � � � �• —� � �a�.�k''�� 1� �' `` r a r.E � a1��i'S'i''.�+i-"5 �t . .._'a ,y;! �` 'r' s - .+ �.'••�t4rc.� "a i�sT"�. `,1� if oz ",a � P s r.h i,. st'�,•r� <_: �.- '� :� k!+y ,^I�'+'Sa ..�j_ .ia ~ a,a�. k+.^9 � `q at.,�L � '•: ,,.. `Y� ...{i �r t •. r � .�wrYr� C•rfai05~f +. D ii Fes"'•AR HAP✓1�('Ji1 4' \a a J / 1,"I�:eZ1 •A�r+r ••i- 1jy�`�L 1, i *`t"J•r t�� ! s�Mh�t"T.4 J��f'bfa t���t�4�.j :fix./�1...w�.. � •x'2 F. � /. Sf �s ..+ �" �., !W :x't�" ""Err*j i�"k'. IJr• L s,x 7t � tt•J a. - t� ' f, ' ,' {.�l`a ,la^ illy rf�}j n t 1 a^t,."�� � �, t� ; « �'" � ' •. « � r.° r th4r1{"• F •t'.1 n Si-r a r',, 3 a,,. � �t � 4 .� � � � �� 6 r t,, ,� a •�� rp,. .,�;, tit �;�" ,. r;,• .:+a rfi '! ►},r:t �r h' J r � 1 l 7 ". A�►...}fY IJt.,Ja rl•!,^ st .. .(' :7 ift-333e`'� ) ,� } ,?yA +•t. • Qtr °•stir ,,�� �� �.�. L a.�x ,. .;,,.,. . � -� r' :�, ' i- � h,a�� �t•1a���s�5.pig>Nv�T`�� tE!�4*'♦ .. '�, "7'+C �i. •� M, ��t �.+.� J,:l� �.�,»�}f�,J•,. r• t!. t ' r ,t,S u s a:x 6 ado ✓ -' .r - '�. .�...•"L,. '1..; ;3. ` �;1 "'r r+•y t.} 4 r t� �Y t 1 3t � f. - .t .{,ar :i ►.ay r4 r !r r.rd{ �. C►!I- �- s�•�'.z tf•„+�: 't5ray �'S� t r taa+�.n' r;., .r�_: -.., J y.sy,ty 's(�L t_♦2+ d.:+.L� t`Ie"� i tFa aFT 1 '� � rrit�;'':S�"'�•�a�"�'�'��\�•,��i""�w'41"�.fJ� .��• yl. i�... -'�� �t /- ":� , .•. �. t,. t ° a'tia I"}J;�C4 t.�c�., •+� ,ib�•� �`.,,s.�j"�',4. L. t ,.► Y ,^y, a. •" t ! '1 '•Y�; ✓ �''u "del i.'V: T ��r ,jlry .-':raJ'J"� a ',J^/ rr� a� th tiY.�t. ,, r t. t: /'t4.. � .ay"~ i� "rt" wt s�+,.. •�'",,�Wi�;1f.1:•rt. X% ..! 7, a. s9 �at�I�V1�•wJ } • f� ' y�1;� 4.� 1' .y a� .f' stir a �1 r+rs,t �` "ui�j4�+?„J,\Jtizv- `a'yYw•`•''' .n'}'•Y�i"'*"_''•���r �L.���� .Ly`�.� r u.�..,.�-• i'ro�4=•t .'Ltr 1�.g•�!%'K �.� - C.,. r ":•.x; f ���J 'J`. r�-IL.•t's. a,�►♦y r. i �M'•t.�,• .r t, �+ '}F,yt� Y7', �y.r.R,.,,o ,ikr`•T�.Y.�„�'. r ,� -.is '!�`�.��.X•• /�ytt �,�f ,v. •r v !;r�'i�1'... �. r i t t'"1/'t� �,'1 t�� 1'7 :Yr j '1 ,i ! °•try}o � r',�T 1j1 'S'* ���+ar�"v rL''r1�a.. :"t,,,k�isT "� +� FIN r ~. T'�. ,:•ii� :Ie�`Ny v r' r�.�at4r• F�•i�'• •mow ' �'�ra�6y •'�.yt iter f ,�v�}��jli�y/�"�, Yf• t Y' ta, �\YL r -a74�1' .r;4i'^t'7�,��.,a �: f�' •. r r r �� _ •', ♦ ly-r,,,�. `,,,t`aStC�f�'S` t:�+-taXt,y'}'>` '1crlF ,;.af.yt 3}.0 ! `� • ' `j _... � T �� Ey1t , r� 442 4tRrmll ,�Qt f aPi r1 �r•� �'j y�f't:y t/► •�. L r fiys`L'�: i . "� f Ott• 2 2 . ,f �`�_ � s'tv ,;a�s•�tss 4't tTt','�!.s2'ti" _ �~1 t".. • P .•{4 .,, •: .� Y.»•... yr fS t� "ai t.rH i--,i- t ,y�,s,rt:.. ''L� �.y'�'st''►f1:='Z-*-r,� ���...-4 r� .:•�►'„ ,� �' • i', --a, „/!•,� � t- S 91.E �.'".. t r � � i` 1.` •"{� '' t .t.'s �' +✓' ►'rS,{ j�•`••,1" 4 .lv. r� .xi1a it{Fr te: �: 'LCT�t�'7..+yt; .'1%v 4.�✓1v;� v „ fs S !.�' S .3 Ht r ._,.1..� }' v •r.t, y,.�.,.,',�'jT! ./i W r a•. /.. '4' a•_r; ►". k. " hi t vzt ���r`..aF��+y..,.. - ^ _ v ".. z.• ;'aril' •rJs°►�:� •, r s�. X vSt'f � '3 atf r�, '+tt .'•.i r� +i ,swr _!it Y:-f�� _� . r. .�4'::k..rs�-:.,' r« 'aR, 'ix' tit."` ;��'. �►: }vT r i ft�2. �„: •� ,J�' .,t >.. 'i•'�. rate ''�` ' ,i, } � , .. � � � .. yUy �' V.. .. L � ; J.T t• � A.ujl.' ,_; b ,..y;l .s� .z. "r ,f.\ a r Mr } t1 1 + r.• TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 6, 1987 1. Vice President Owens called the meeting to order at 7:50 PM. The meeting was held at the Tigard Civic Center - TOWN HALL ROOM - 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Vice President Owens, Commissioners Barber, Peterson, Leverett, Newton, and Moen (arrived 8:15). Absent: Commissioner Fyre. (Two vacant positions) Staff: Keith Liden, Senior Planner; Elizabeth Newton, Senior Planner; Jerry Offer, Assistant Planner; Diane Jelderks, Planning Commission Secretary. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Barber seconded to approve minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present. Commissioner Newton abstained. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION The applicant and applicant's representative for items 5.1 and 5.2 requested that the Commission hear the items in reverse order because of the number of people in attendance for item 5.2. The Commission agreed. 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 87-07 ZONE CHANGE 87-21 CITIZENS SAVINGS AND LOAN NPO # 7 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment on 43.26 acres from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and a Zone Change request from R-4.5 (PD) (Low Density Residential, 4.5 units/acre Planned Development) to R-7 (PD) (Medium Density Residential, 7 units/acre, Planned Development.) LOCATION: South of Summer Lake Park, east of 130th Avenue. (WCTM 1S1 33DD lot 100). Senior Planner Liden reviewed the proposal stating that the request is for R-T single family residential with 5,000 square foot minimum lots, and that there are a number of different accesses for the proposed project. The staff concluded that the porposed amendment is consistent with the plan's policy. Staff recommended the Commission forward the proposal to City Council with a recommendation for approval. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Ryan O'Brien, representing Citizens Savings and Loan, summarizing their proposal. He explained they would not be developing the property to as high a density as they are requesting; they are proposing 210 lots. This ( request would help the City meet its goal of 10 units per buildable acre. The main access road would be 135th, with other accesses being 128th and Katherine Steet. The proposal meets the locational criteria. Also, the i density would be compatible because of the higher densities in the area. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 6, 1987 - page i j Sam PUBLIC TESTIMONY o David Patterson, 12150 SW 128th, opposed the request. Regardless of the applicant's intent, they would be allowed to develop to the maximum allowed. Initially all traffic would access down 128th and Katherine, which has noticed a significant change since Katherine Street was put through, especially with building material trucks. He noted that a previous proposal had been denied on the basis that it would be a threat to the livability of the area, and this proposal would do the same. o Jeff Gray, 12170 SW 128th, stated he has seen a significant change in traffic in the 3 1/2 years he has lived on 128th. His concern was that traffic would not use 135th to get to Scholls Ferry because of its poor condition and that the traffic instead will cut through the residential area to 121st to Scholls Ferry Road. Also there is no guarantee that the property would develop with lots only slightly smaller than 7500 square feet. Smaller lots would bring about a decline in property values and would create tract homes instead of a planned develoment. o Nancy Campbell, 12790 SW Katherine St, was concerned that an additional parcel north of Mary Woodard School should be developed iii conjunction with this site. She was concerned about water runoff, because of the hard clay ground. She opposed high. density going in the middle of low density. She was concerned about the condition of the roads which would serve the development. o Bruce Parker, 12705 SW Katherine, was concerned about the increased traffic. He felt this property should not be developed until 135th is improved. When he purchased his property he had checked the zoning and confirmed he would be abutting R-4.5 and he would like to have that zoning maintained. He requested everyone who is opposed to the proposal to please stand up. (Majority of the audience stood.) o Jim Nielsen, 12410 SW 128th, stated that there has been an extraordinary increase in traffic as well as speed on 128th. He stated there are significant traffic problems on Scholls Ferry and even Summer Lake owners avoid using Scholl Ferry Road. Even if 135th is the main access, the majority of the trafffic will still use 128th. If this is approved, something needs to be done to minimize the impact on 128th. Also, this property is within the Beaverton School District, which means Beaverton buses will be using Tigard streets to pick up children in this area. o Dennis Kruger, 12612 SW Snow Brush Ct., agreed with the previous speakers. He did not feel the applicant met Goal 5 as there is no additinal open space proposed. He felt a 46 percent increase in density is not a small increase. o Barbara Brandes, 12140 SW 127th, stated that this is a neighborhood with lots of children and they already have a problem with trucks speeding down the dead end street, slamming on their brakes, then backing out again. o Sheryl Norris, 12815 SW Katherine, opposed the proposal stating that there is substantial wildlife in the area that had not been addressed. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 6, 1987 - Page 2 yn o Maxine Resler, 12135 SW 128th, agreed with previous testimony and opposed the proposal. o Earl Resler, 12135 SW 123th, agreed with previous testimony and opposed the proposal. o J. A. Paterson, 11605 SW Manzanita, stated he had no quarrel with the density. However, he owns 5 acres north of Mary Woodard school, which is landlocked and he will need an access when this site develops. Discussion followed with Commissioners on how property became landlocked. o Doris Parlukovich, 12345 SW 128th, suggested that the access road be improved prior to development and that 128th be blocked off. o Jane Hamilton, 12285 SW 128th, agreed with previous testimony adding that they had expected the park area to be larger than it is. o Thomas Crompton, 12995 SW Katherine, agreed with previous testimony and opposed the proposal. o Leonard Kapp, 12245 SW 1.28th Ave, opposed the development and agreed with the previous testimony. o Roger Heath, 12215 SW 128th Ave., opposed the proposal stating that a traffic study needed to be done to see what the impact would be on the neighborhood. o Mary Phillips, 12940 SW Katherine, was concerned about the traffic impact to the neighborhood. F o Mark Zimel, 12925 SW Katherine questioned if the projected 110 additional trips during the peak hour were based on the potentenial or just for the extra 108 lots. He noted that a Comprehensive Plan amendment could be granted only if an error had been made but that this had not been addressed. He was also concerned on how they would treat the greenway. o Tony Stratis, 12165 SW 128th, opposed the proposal. He was concerned about the traffic impact and supported the neighbors' testimony. E i o Art Lutz, 12800 SW Gacier Lily Circle, requested denial of the application. He reviewed the history of the site, stating that the previous developer had been denied a zone change because it was not good for the City or its citizens. REBUTTAL, o Ryan O'Brien stated he was not aware of the previous zone change request. He was willing to have the Commission put a limit of 210 - 215 units on the site: He also stated that the development would not intrude into the Greenway and the development would provide an access to the landlocked property. He stated that 135th is scheduled for construction in the spring and that the Murray Blvd. extension should be constructed soon. He noted that no one was taking advantage of the R-12 and R-25 zoning nearby but were developing as single family residential, which should allow for an additional 30 units on this site. Discussion followed regarding the size of the lots and accesses. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 6, 1987 - Page 3 o Vice President Owens commented that the park size did not shrink and suggested anyone interested in what is planned for the park should obtain a copy of the recently adopted park plan. o Senior Planner Liden reviewed the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan, which allows for a connection of 128th to Winter Lake Drive or 130th, noting that the method had not been described. Also, the site would require a storm drainage system which would be approved through engineering. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioner Peterson did not feel there was a need for smaller lots, and because of the negative impact to the surrounding neighborhood, opposed the proposal. o Don Moen stated that he would not be voting, however he concurred with Commissioner Peterson, adding that development of 130th is a long way off. o Commissioners Barber, Leverett, Newton, and Owens all opposed the development as being ahead of its time and having negative traffic impacts. +� Commissioner Newton moved and Commissioner Leverett seconded to forward CPA 87-07 and ZC 87-21 to City Council with a recommendation for denial based on the finding that Policy 8.1.1 will not be satisifed due to the lack of access through 130th. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present. Commissioner Moen abstained. 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 87-06 ZONE CHANGE ZC 87-20 MARGERY KRUEGER NPO # 7 For a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for a 5 acre parcel f rom C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-25 (Medium High Density Residential, 25 units/acre) and a second Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change request to change 15 acres of land f rom R-25 to C-G (General Commercial). LOCATION: East side of New Scholls Ferry Road along the north and south side of the proposed Murray Blvd. extension (WCTM 2S1 4B lot 101). Senior Planner reviewed the proposal explaining the history of the existing C-N site. Discussion followed regarding the alignment of Old Scholls and New Scholls Ferry Road. Senior Planner Liden continued by outlining the plan's criteria for a plan and zone amendment and additional direction of the City Council that staff did not feel the applicant met. He summarized a letter received from Washington County and made staff's y: recommendation for denial. Discussion followed regarding several findings t and conclusions, and City Council's policy for replacing residential density when residentially zoned property is rezoned to commercial. S APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Russ Krueger, 1335 SW 66th # 402, Portland, OR 97225 explained his is reasons for wanting to move the C-N zoning from the opposite side of the Murray Blvd. extension. He stated that he had just received a copy of the letter from Washington County and would be talking with them about their h. PIANNINC COMMISSION MINUTES - October 6, 1987 - Page 4 comments. He felt because of the amount of single family development in the area that there is a need for a 15 acre Commercial Center and that this would not take away from the downtown plan; that the site is buffered by R-12 zoning to the south, and noted that there are other shopping centers that have residential property abutting more than two sides, i.e. Howards on Scholls and Canterbury Square. He stated that he is asking for help for tomorrow by reserving this area as C-G. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o The consensus of the Commission was that the criteria had not been met to warrant making the change. Commissioners Newton, Leverett, and Moen where not opposed to just moving the C-N to the opposite side of the proposed Murrary Blvd. extension. * Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Leverett seconded to forward CPA 87-06 and ZC 87-20 to City Council with a recommendation for denial based on the finding that policy 5.1.4 had not been met. Motion carried by majority of Commissioner present, Commissioner Moen voting no. 5.3 ADMENDMENT TO PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR S 8-86 . BUTLER TERRACE SUBDIVISION NPO #6 Request to modify a condition of approval requiring a sidewalk between the end of SW Inez and SW 97th Avenue. Located: East of SW 97th Aveneue and west of SW Inez St. (WCTM 2S1 11AC lot 2700). Senior Planner Liden reviewed the applicant's request to eliminate the pedestrian pathway and made the staff recommendation for retention of the pathway/sidewalk. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Sam Gotter, 9541 SW Inez, Developer/Owner, stated the main reason for his request is for the safety issue and the difficulty of the grade. He explained that they would construct a walkway which would connect the sidewalk to the Tuality Junior High parking lot and that the school had agreed to maintain that portion. Discussion followed regarding the extension into the school parking lot and portions of the path/sidewalk the applicant is requesting to eliminate. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Darwin Webb, 9529 SW Inez, has resided at this address since May and felt the area would only be used by John Q. Public. He supported the applicant's request as he was concerned for injuries which would occur from the path being used by skateboarders. o Jim Castile, 9563 SW Inez, supported the applicant's request based on the Csafety issue and because of the problems that would be attracted. o Audrey Castile, 9563 SW Inez, supported the applicant's request. She was concerned with the safety issue and that the sidewalk would be used by the public and would create problems such a trash thrown in her yard or defacing of the fence. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 6, 1987 - Page 5 PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Consensus of the Commission is that the property owners in the area are more familar with the problems and the need for the pathway. Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Moen seconded to amend final order 86-15PC deleting the requirement for a bike path and a portion of the. sidewalk and installing the crossover into the school parking lot as the applicant requested. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present. Commissioner Newton abstained. Commissioner Leverett and Senior Planner Liden left 11:05. 5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 87-03, ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 87-04 ZONE CHANGE ZC 87-16 NPO # 1 A remand by the City Council for amendment to the Findings, Policies, and Implementation Strategies Document to add Action Area goals and policies as an additional area of Special Concern; to assign the Action Area overlay to the CBD district; to amend the Tigard Municipal Code to add a chapter regulating development in Action Areas; and, to review Chapter 18.66 CBD zoning district requirements. o Senior Planner Newton review the purpose and intent of the proposed amendments. Discussion followed regarding the purpose, intent, and ( process. o Consensus of the Commission is that the prohibited uses should be conditional uses. Discussion followed regarding the use of Drive In window services. x Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to forward CPA 87-03, ZOA 87-04, and ZC 87-16 to City Council recommending the following changes: 1. That this be an interim plan. 2. Strike drive-through restaurant windows. 3. Modify "Prohibited Uses" to "Conditional Use" or limit the prohibitied uses to new developments. Also, that existing property owners be made aware of these proposed changes. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present, Commissioner Newton voting no. 6. OTHER BUSINESS o There was no other business. 7. ADJOURNMENT - 11:45 PM Diane M. Jelderks ATTEST: Bonnie Owens, Vice President 1336D/cs PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 6, 1987 : - Page 6 REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS SLC. Gtt2� TO: DATE: FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: -LPA :Z, o7 8 7 ( Gf•h•Loan sgq 441/'/I1- ^ G -717At, 7 PI`? o�q 4,3,z awes Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be Prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal .in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by , 19 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Plan6ing Department, P.O. Box 23397, Burnham and'Ash Ave., Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: ��14'd l lir PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal'and-have no objections to it. Please contact of'our office. s i Please refer to the enclosed letter. F J Written comments: 4 V-",- nnanvwL t2fltn 60 4 r � V t 1 Name of Person Commenting: ��• UL�� L�'.GUi�• #J!'• ��iL{�l �'.� Y((44* 1 f .� Phone No. (KSL:pm/0356P) E)vc (sl YJ -DOMMM MtttL'f) Date : l � NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED --- _.I 2 3 4 _. _ _ 5 6_ 7 8 9 IPO If DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO .. THE QUALITY OF TFE ORIGINAL _- - DRAWING. _ OFE 6Z SZ LZ 82 SZ OZ EZ ZZ IZ OZ 6t 81 LI - 91 -Sf bl EI ZI II 01 Z 'tNN1111�1111�iItI�1111�II111N11�Nll�lll�l,p�J,�1I -- ''. .._._L_-_�"H AR MPCHI . _ 111+111111 1. ti. I-� �J SIMMER LAKE HAWKS BEARD Sr. PARK SNOW Febn , 1987 Sy SCALE: 1"=20d I PARK BOUNDARY - ! Oz �.® BPRROOPNO PARK I —1 I 7 ILAKE ' v v N N AXPOSEO fia4>,/ ..\ {1L'� ��� DAKOTA ST. uj Picr& SUMMER LAKE" Arao- Arw j. ARM SHEFFIELD � � . AM SUMMER Sr � 1 zi �l a S�,pEz� PROPOSED ROAD \ \ NOTE: �+1�J�P�7T�TIhT+i►P56t_I �lil��lC�if�+i+Bd1111 +i+�+hi!II9�11+1+11'ylil{fO I{r(111'lllllll�l,ei+{+�I{e�►!I - _- ._.. - - - --- -..•----- - DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF TFE ORIGINAL _.. DRAWING. --- - - oe—ez az-:-iz ez sz oz cz zziz oz sr ei—ii""-si si-.-bi EI zi --o -of s e i - 9__ s__. $ _. e- z 1a� F . 1 . I 1 i MUNIIII It 1W1IWIIIS cMl uulnu anluu euNu nlnNbinlunm+ I. , d.".1"� .L...+...�..-,... C; MAR ' '/ate/ i �. • SII _` 9199® ; - R James M Nielsen 12410 SW 128tn Tigard, OR 97223 ( ,ac - 3 yE K Planning Commission. City of Tigard Tigard, OR The enclosed petition represents the desire of residents of Tigard in the vicinity of the planned Summer Lake II subdivision. It contains signatures from every household on a five block length of SW 128th and a one-block length of SW Katherine on either side of 128th where the new subdivision will begin. lie respectfully request that our petition be taken into account when approving development plans for this area. J s 1 Nielsen A._ OCT 131987 CITY OF rjuxw PLANNING DEPT Ham EM A PETITION BY CONCERNED CITIZENS OF TIGARD We, the undersigned, respectfully request that the developer of the Summer Lake II subdivision (located south of Summer Lake, north of SW Katherine, and east of S11 130th) be required to terminate S11 128th at Sld Katherine such that it does not continue northward into the new subdivision.. ----------------------------- - NAME (PRINT) ; SIGNATURE ; ADDRESS -- -------------- ---- �--�2 f '�L �� ------ ZiA --- -----'--- -----`------- f) )I twig-�<,�S --------------------- - � ------ ----------------------- -------- 112.LLQ i2- 'T C-4 P--'D _�<< - / ---- 'Ile ------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 1\'-Ja �r1_ �1�,? .—lu so -------------- �I kt&ztut� ----------------- ------ - ------ Z----yl7ZZ C.1 ---- -- -- �'-=� 1" �/ ----�= - ---------------------------------- ---- -- �e �7- � -�'x- -��a���=�-'�--�--- -.�l.+�ffGL'E I s�L__=��1�-S Sa✓�,,Zy��?�� rJ��� A PETITION BY CONCERNED CITIZENS OF TIGARD We, the undersigned, respectfully request that the developer of the Summer Lake II subdivision. (located south of Summer Lake, north of S« Katherine, and east of SW 130th) be requirea to terminate SW 128th at SW Katherine such that it does not continue northward into the new subdivision. ---------------------------------------------------------------- NAME (PRINT) GNATURE' ADDRESS U ------------------- 1 - 6k Cil z-r- _- ---- �/n c�i .�_C_/�lic�«�_ ��_,�= / rr _1Zs _ s�✓ ll7�c',e����-- � � -9 7. -Co - _ n_2_ ni _Toh p�___�� --- --� ---L2 --------------- ---- -- - 7 z ' If -------------------- -----------------=-------------------=---------------- �Lev Mu �, J �Edi�- �(U,I lY'�b'2.TM� ' I S L w � � Z 7 (�'✓( y Z ------ V L12, Vogl n ,:v' -----------------1 S�__ __I i j_ _--------- � -r 0 MOM ' w J' ---- S�Nt� r7 �.J���2 S/�� �L5-3j S � ��'� �/�..f�1�17 _��Z•L� October 21, 1987 CITY~ TIVARD James M. Nielsen ®REC30H 12410 SW 128th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 RE: 128th Avenue Petition Dear Mr. Nielsen: Our Department has reviewed a petition received October 13, 1987 that requests 128th Avenue not be extended to the north. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan designates 130th Avenue, Wlnterlake Drive, and 128th Avenue as part of a minor collector street route between Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. (see attached Plan)amendment must must er ot to be approved by 2the th Avenue further north, a Comprehensive City Council. If vour neighborhood is interested in proposing such an amendment, I would suggest that you first contact your Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) renresentntive, Richard Boberg (phone: 639-2342) to dt.scuss the matter with the NPO. City staff is also available to review the issues which must be addressed in order to implement this revision. Unfortunately, due to existing development and topos;rnphy, there appears to be to serve your neiQrhood. no alternate route for a minor. collector street In order to provide good traffic ct.rculation an(l pond access for eememergency vehicles, a minor collector street is needed. R', ,ed on current Information and Council pollcv, the staff will be opno5tl to a revision which me t}'c,ul i eliminate this n ot�ntial. for this 128th Avenue r`)nnr, t •, n. At th.` subdivision proposal is submitted, we world `"' ;'i ��:+�;rd t�� Work With th<• ection to Scholl+s'SF(rrryR tliroits-.h tst tlt neighborhood, through to NPO, to explore }+e and to encourage development of a connnrimary access to the new subdivision. It is imnortant to understand that unless the Cnm;�T','`+�'1i.;+'•` }'; +rl tm rui�`d, + i a„velo er of the property north of Bellwood will' `. "` , ea:.r'I t'+ nrovidr for P 01P northerl.v extenslnn of 128th %venur. you have any questions. •"' Stnrerely, cg/j1,37n cr: Lttr.harrinh�r' Attachment l{�. i`.•`�Fi�J!I i{�`. .�. ,tib,.T'QC•,-� ( v "�;- . . ".. _ _ _. _ " Oil Is TIGARD LEGEND ~OMRRE�-IE�NSIVF i .OMM1i�.��;�.,tr i TW._ I.- •.1 . � `_ - .�Y r,��al ,.v,� n '`5tr AVfNU� N- -R N "L-WE LM' I': : "• "' •I�I rl JAK111: A%'_ . �It1C•PIh '. 'NNt 2 Pi—AN 2 4RE4 (SI:SINGS"Oul. OV741L. 9yk L'C+ :. STFLI 1),4N. W 1'.Utl A9 N':_ Nil A In IBM � PORT�T ���� 4 COUNfCTi0N5 dETwt.ch •,t.. ' � :r i._.�, ?v ..•I1n. Hf.,",' 4 " i! S '..)NNFCTIONS 8ETwFF.I H(' i 'IK'', r;..0.!, Hr. -L.V; r n'MP.ti4 ',06 -n:i _Y1 `.'1C NUNITA PO4P ORD — 24 n� -83 6 CN^rEl T,:••. BETWCL'+ .�11ir H- 'nw41 AND .IA UARTMOVT^t, BET'14E EN 69••. Y j(�� MAMPTON VIA A LGCFE! ve.r. i.. TME wFS(EKLY PORr10�1 rs: THE TFIAN:L` I Y I AY 9 , ! 9 V 3 7 .n••NLCTIO'V fF (.(TMMC R .t; Fr. W l;lri AND 9811� AV• NuES 8 .VNNECTION .1C ASH AVr.h1.• FrT i-EN HIU.L 4f:ET ..r, 1-:',,14* „N • AK HOUR T RAFFit PROJECTIONS t(Y�Ihr .c l'NIM=4 `rte' °H 1 0 0 9 'T+ECT : ,CA. YEAR 2000 10 ,, y�.�_ -rr:. . M.'I,_.., =hOJEC;10Ns 100 EXISTING STREETS YEAR 1990 i 0 0 ® A" ' ``i A PROJECTIONS �i///////////////� •nrC00_ECT,)I"\ -AR TMEh' ' ;► {::' !1-3HTRAIL TRANSIT CORRIDORS ( L— R G O } co rn O .v.: _ S� • is r ; Si �+ ♦� l� o` ME F.P om 14, 1 V _ i 4}. �` �� r t +'ee Y. � •�r ,:.Chi. [� t. 1. _ r . an 1 t, qt4.. w• jXe� ;tj ♦ f .y V i wl, , ETigard Public Schools,District 23% Administration Office 13137 S.W. Pacific Hwy. Tigard,Oregon 97223 Area Code(503)620-1620 October 6, 1987 Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Civic Center 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 1987 Tigard, Oregon CITY OF IIGARD PLANNING DEPT. RE: CPA 87-07 ZC 87-21 Ryan O'Brien Land Development Dear Commission Members: The above referenced application is adjacent to Mary Woodward Elementary School. However, the development will not be in the Tigard School District. The applicant is hereby advised that the property is in the Beaverton School District. It would be unfortunate for future residents to assume they can attend Mary Woodward School. ME Sincerely, Dr: Russell AeJoki Sbper'intendent RAJ:k CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 2, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: October 23, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: LCRB Rules PREVIOUS ACTION: 1985 adoption of Clarification rule__s curr�'nt_1� being used PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ' i`'t'i1 REQUESTED BY: Loreen Wilson �_—_...�__._._---------•_.__.._._-____.__.____.__--POLICY ISSUE Should the LCRB modify Lhe rules adopted by Ordinance No. 85-06 to truly reflect the procedural intent of the Board at: that time? INFORMATION SUMMARY In 1985, the Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) adopted procedural rules with the approval of Ordinance No. 85--06. Staff has discovered through the codification update process that the ordinance had all or some of the language of three sections omitted. Upon reviewing the record, it is clear that: the Board's intent was to adopt this language. It is currently difficult to implement the procedures with this language excluded. The sections of the rules which were omitted in part or in entirety ware: 10.070 - Insurance Contracts; 10. 105 Life Cycle Cost: Analysis; and 10. 11.0 - Request For Proposal . Staff has added Lhe language for these sections into the rules attached. Staff also has taken this opportunity t;o alphabei,izo thca definition sections of the manual (10.010 Arid 30.002.) which will make the manual more user--fr•icndly .. The attached ordinance would repeal Ordinance No. 85-06 in its entirety and adopt the rules as the LCRB intended in 1985 with the addition of the alphabetization of two definition sections. St;aff will be continuing the codification update process. Along with that the purchasing rules which need to be reviewed and effort:, there are areas of possibly modified. These issues will be brought back to tho. LCRB for furt.hor action at a later date. _. ALL TERNATIVES ('ONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached ordinance. F 2. Give staff further direction. FISCAL IMPACT > y: 1. -0- 4 2. -0- SUGGESTED ACTION `r Alternative #1 - Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 87- lw/1515D i c CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MEMORANDUM z TO: Flonor•able Mayor and City Council October 23, 1987 w 6 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator�J w ' SUBJECT: COUNCIL. CALENDAR, FY 1987-88 H r/� • a H Attached is an updated tentative calendar fur this fiscal year. official v x I've! put question marks (7) z Council meetings ar•e marked with an asterisk ( ) • 0 ! v along side those still needing Council OR. If generally OK, we can proceed an make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council. Calendars. October JS/BJ -- !x7..6, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) DL/JM November ; X2, Mon Council. Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) i BJ -- Boards & Committees Workshop (7:00) k 4, Wed 7-10, Sat--Tues Lprague of Oregon Cities Conference, Portland (NOTE: Most Council related issues on Saturday & Sunday) HOLIDAY CITY HALL. CE_OSF.D -- Budget CommitLee Workshop ll , Wed (Capital Budget Finance) i x1G, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) s 18, Wed E911 Workshop (7:30) - Clackamas County Communications Center* - Oregon City. 5 MACC mooting (1:30), Beaverton Library 19, Thurs Communi1,y Development Block Grant Planning Advisorymamm Board (7:30) - North Plains Senior Center 20--21, Fri--Sat Council Goal Setting Workshop JE -- x23, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 26, Thurs Thanksgiving Holiday 27, Fri City Hall Closed December x7, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 12-16, Sat-Wed National League of Cities Conference (Las Vegas) JE/TB -- x14, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) 16, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) - Beaverton 1-ibrary 17, Thurs Community Development Block Grant Planning Advisory Board (7:30) - Location TBA JE -- x'21, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) E • Council Calendar - Page 1 January ?4, Mon Fanno Creek/Town Hall Conference? *11, Mon Council Business Meeting 13, Wed Budget Committee Meeting (Supplemental Budget & Budget Guidelines) 20. Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) Beaverton Library *18, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) 21, Thurs Community Development Block Grant Planning Advisory Board (7:30) - Location TBA *25, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 26, Tues Boards & Committee Chairs Meeting (7:00) February *1, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) X8, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) *15, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 17, Weds MACC: Meeting (1:30), Beaverton Library 18, Thurs Community Development Block Grant Planning Advisory Board (7:30) -- Location TBA 22, Mori NO COUNCIL. (President.'s Day) 23, Wed Boards & Committee Chairs Meeting (7:00) March 2, Wed Budget Committee (Message and Revenues) X7, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 9, Wed Budget Committee (Departmental. Requests) X14, Mori _ Council Study Agenda (6:30) 16, Wed Budget Commiti:ee (Departmental Requests) MACC Meeting (1:30) - Beaverton Library 17, Thurs Community Development Block Grant Planning Advisory Board (7:30) - Location TBA *21, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 23, Wed Budget Committee (Recommendation) ?30, Wed Budget Committee (Recommendation) t April *11, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) ?15-16, Fri-Sat Council Workshop *18, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) 20, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) - Beaverton Library 21, Thurs Community Development Block Grant Planning Advisory r Board (7:30) - Location TBA *25, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 26, Tues Volunteer Awards & Recognition i may *9, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) *16, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) 18, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) - Beaverton Library 19, Thurs Community Development Block Grant Planning Advisory Board (7:30) - Location TBA *2.3, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) Council Calendar - Page 2 June j *13, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 16, Thurs Community Development Block Grant Planning Advisory Board (7:30) — Location TBA *20, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) 22, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) — Beaverton Library *27, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) mh0026a r Council Calendar — Page 3 C7rY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 2, 1987 DATE SUBMIT-FED: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Street�j2ht�Liq PREVIOUS ACTION: Discussion in Policy Report September, 1987 ry-NPREPARED BY: John Ac:kar�:�-� DEPT HEAD 0 . 'ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Wi 11 iarn Monahan ................. POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY During the September 28, 1987, Council discussion on streetlight policy, Councilor Schwar-Lz asked for typical costs for the installation of streetlights in existing nt,i ghbo rhood s The attached report summarizes stroutlighting possibilities for the 00 Pinobrook subdivision lots with costs ranging from $156 to $404 per lot. ALTERNATIVFC, CONSIDERED Information only FISCAL IMPACT None SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and file is/1463D Mq Im MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t TO: Members of the City Council October 22, 1987 FROM: John Acker, Assistant Planne r SUBJECT: Costs of streetlight installation for a typical existing neighborhood At the September 2.8, 1987 Council meeting, staff introduced a discussion of City Streetlight Policy. The discussion included current City policy for new developments, present system deficiencies and streetlight installation in existing neighborhoods . Since developers are required to purchase and install streetlight systems, then dedicate them to the City, property owners are indirectly paying for streetlights through purchase price. To be consi,tent, staff suggested that costs for installing streetlight systems in existing neighborhoods should be born by the property owners who benefit. Councilor Schwartz requested that staff- assemble "typical costs" for streetlight installation in an existing area. The following report summarizes a range of costs that could be expected for- the Pinebrook Subdivision. Pint-brook was chosen because of past interest in streetlights. STREETLIGHTING — PINEBROOK Pinebrook subdivision was developed in 1965. At that time, power was supplied underground but streetlights were not installed or provided for. If desired, streetlights should be located at or near locations marked in red on the attached map. Given the configuration of this area, these 17 locations would be appropriate regardless of fixture wattage chosen. Fixture style choices are: (1) Town & Country, (2) Rectangular Box or, (3) Cobra Head. 1) TOWN & COUNTRY Town & Country fixtures are available in 70W HPS only. These fixtures are mostly ornamental because of their low wattage and multi—directional design. Purchase price is $241 each for a total fixture cost of $4,097. These fixtures are mounted on 16 foot poles. These poles are available in fiberglass - $415 each - $7,055 total; laminated wood - $552 each - $9,384 total; or, aluminum - $848 each - $14,416 total. 2) RECTANGULAR BOX 'rho rectangular box fixtures, sometimes called shoebox, are available in 100 or 150 watt, with 100 watt appropriate for residential installation. These fixtures also come in cutoff (flat lens) or, semi-cutoff (drop lens) styles. Both styles are more directed toward the roadway Lhan the Town & Country, but the semi-cutoff would cover a wider, arca than the cutoff style. Purchase price of a 100 W fixLur•e, either style, is $410 each or $6,970 for the entire subdivision. These fixtures are generally mounted on 25 foot poles. 3) COBRA HEAD The cobra head fixtures are available in a variety of wattages of which 70 W and 100 W may be appropriate for residential installation. These fixtures are also available in either cutoff or semi-cutoff styles with the difference the: same as Lhat described for the rectangular box. Purchase price for a 70 W fixture is $235 each or $3,995 total; 100 W fixtures would cost $265 each or $4,505 total. Either of these fixtures are also normally mounted on 25 foot poles. Twenty--five foot poles aro available in fiberglass, $544 each - $9,248 total; creosote wood -- $350 each - $5,950 to Lal; cur•vvd laminated wood -- $816 each $13,872 total; or. aluminum $1,244 each -• $21, 148 total. purlha costs for fixtures and poles includo installation, but do riot include S c. cost of bringing power, to the fixture. For underground installations, costs are incurred for trenching and backfill. The cost of trenching/backfill is approximately $50/hour for, a backhoe. The amount of Lime neaded for each light varies with the distance to a secondary power- source, ability to find the power- source, and obstacles encounLered such as trees, driveways, and landscaping. Trenching/backfill costs can be as little ars $150 per fixt.uro or- as much as $250 per- fixture which for the 17 fixtures in Pinebrook would bo a low of $2,550 and a high of $4,2.50. Since Pinebrook's utilities are underground, a streetlight system would need to : underground. If an older subdivision has overhead utilities, power, to streetlights could conceivably be installed overhead. The cost of supplying power through overhead wires is calculated. PGE bills the user according to the cost of labor plus material, less a $150 per- fixture allowance. These costs will vary with the density of streetlights. A PGE representative said that the costs are usually more than the $150 allowance but not as much as typical trenching costs. UNDERGROUND ESTIMATED COST FOR PINEBROOK — 17 Fixtures High _ Low 70 W Town & Country W/16' fiberglass pole $15,402 $13,702 W/16' wood pole $17,731 $16,031 W/16' aluminum pole $22.,763 $21,063 11 igh Low _ 70 W Cobra Head W/25' fiberglass pole $17,493 $15,793 W/25' creosote pole $14, 195 $12,495 W/25' laminated wood pole $22.,117 $20,417 W/25' aluminum pole $29,393 $2.7,693 NOTE.: the higher wattage and inure focused styles may provide gre,+ter illumination on the roadways. High _ Low _ 100 W/Cobra Head W/25' fiberglass pole $18,003 $16,303 W/25' creosote pole $14,705 $13,005 W/25' laminated wood pole $22,627 $20,927 W/25' aluminum pole $2.9,903 $28,203 H_2h— _..._Low 100 W Rectangular Box W/2.5' fiberglass pole $20,468 $18,765 W/2.5' creosote pole $17, 170 $15,470 W/2.5' laminated wood pole $25,092 $23,392 W/2.5' aluminum pole $32,368 $30,668 Costs for streetlight purchase and trenching in the Pinebrook Subdivision would be divided among the 80 lots receiving benefits. This could result in a per lot cost of from $156. 19 for 70 W Cobra Head fixtures on creosote poles with easy trenching to $404.60 for a 100 W rectangular box on an aluminum pole with difficult trenching. Because of long term instability in energy prices, attention should be given to monthly electricity consumption and maintenance costs. These costs vary according to fixture wattage and pole size and type. a a 9 Monthly costs for customer- owned equipment Fixtures (energy and maintenance): 70 W HPS 3 .88 100 W HPS 4.64 Poles (maintenance): 16' Fiberglass 0.35 16' Laminated wood 0.48 16' Aluminum 0.79 25' Fiberglass 0.45 251 Creosote wood 0.33 25' Curved laminated wood 0.68 ' 25' Aluminum 1 .23 Currently, developers of now subdivisions ar•e required to install streetlights. Developers are directed to have PGE: design the str-eetlight system according to Illuminating Engineering Society Standards. The standards apply to the amount: of light: on r•oadw,:ays of particular, classification (local., collector-, etc. ), with cons ider'at:ion given to such variables as fixture type, uniformity, spacing, WOUnt:ing height, and traffic conflict ar•cas. Within ` these parameters, developers aro allowed to select fixtures and pules that are available through PGE (drawings attached) . Recent developments typically install 70 W Town & Country fixtures on 16' fiberglass Finstal and operational. streetlight system is dc�dic<.ated to the City eSalong� with Lal lUd estimated to operate and maintain the system for 24 months . Retrofitting an existing subdivision with streetlights could be accomplished in either of two ways that would be consistent with now development: procedures . Property owners could collectively hire a lighting cunt:ractiny who would follow the procedures outline above; Or the city could purchase and install a system and assess the property owners. The cost to the property owner presumably would be the same. PLEASE NOTE: The staff will present a report to Council in December or January which analyzes City standards for streetlights. Streetlight system design in terms of fixture style, height, spacing, eLc. , is dependent upon accepted standards. Whether or not we should follow the existing procedures will be evaluated. 1. cs/1374D t 1 Emil ff T L a :x is ti UI L- rr. di t 7 G• r: STANDARD STREET LIGHT FIXTURES t AV 4 i HORIZONTAL "COBRA-HEAD" ROADWAY i FIXTURE---SEMI-CUTOFF TYPE R 0 HORIZONTAL "COBRA-HEAD" ROADWAY FIXTURE---CUTOFF TYPE r.: F HORIZONTAL "SHOEBOX" RECTILINEAR FIXTURE---SEMI-CUTOFF TYPE HORIZONTAL "SHOEBOX" RECTILINEAR FIXTURE---CUTOFF TYPE EARLY AMERICAN OR TOWN & COUNTRY POST-TOP FIXTURE s FLOOD LIGHT FIXTURE STANDARD WOOD STREET LIGHT POLES FOR "COBRA-HEAD" FIXTURES a FOR POST-TOP FIXTURES t Ground Line Ground Line LAMINATED WOOD POLES STANDARD CELLON-TREATED WOOD POLE CENTER-BORED GRAY-PAINTED WOOD POLE STANDARD ALUMINUM AND FIBERGLASS STREET LIGHT POLES PRECAST CONCRETE BASE FOR ALUMINUM POLES Lr- ALUMINUM ALUMINUM TAPERED DAVIT EXTENDED ARM ALUMINUM FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FOR SHOEBOX FOR COBRA-HEAD FOR POST-TOP FIXTURE FMASTARM SHOE BOX BRACKET � I FIBERGLASS POLES ARE DIRECT-BURY TYPE SOc.fE7-`r APPLAC.AVWJ gDOK Note:The recommended illuminance values shown are meaning- Fig. 14-6. Recommendations for Roadway Average ful only when designed in conjunction with other elements The most critical ide as described in this section are as follows: Maintained Illuminance on the Horizontal ( (a))Light ghi dopreuation Urban" (b)duality (c)Uniformity Vehicular Commeraa intermediate Residential (e)Spac amounting heights Roadway Clas- sdicationFoot- Fool- Foot- (n Transverse location of luminaires Lux candles Lux candies Lux candles (A)LuminTrafficaire selection etre s Freewayt 6 0.6 6 0.6 6 0.6 (1)Border areas Expresswayt 15 1.4 13 1.2 11 1.0 p)Transition lighting Major 22 2.0 15 1.4 11 1.0 (k)Alleys Collector 13 1.2 10 0.9 6 0.6 (1)Roadway lighting layouts Local 10 0.9 6 0.6 4 0.4 'Sae page 14-2. " See page 14-3. Alleys 6 0.6 4 0.4 •4 0.4 t Both mainline and ramps. KS LIGHTING HANDBOOK DESIGN OF ROADWAY LIGHTING 14-9 1@el APPLICATION VOLUME Fig. 14-7. Recommendations for Average Maintained Illuminance on the Horizontal for Pedestrian Ways Average Levels for Special Pedestrian Security' Minimum Average Levels - Mounting Heights 3 to 5 Mounting Heights 5 to 10 Walkway and Bikeway Ctassillcatlon• meters meters 19 to 15 feed (15 to 30 feed Lux Footcandles Lux Footcandles Lux Foolcanoles Sidewalks (roadside) and Type A bikeways Commercial areas 10 0.9 22 2.0 43 4.0 Intermediate areas 6 0.6 11 1.0 22 2.0 Residential areas 2 0.2 4 0.4 9 0.8 Walkways distant from roadways and Type 8 bikeways Park walkways and bikeways 5 0.5 6 0.6 1 1 1.0 10111111 Pedestrian tunnels 43 4.0 54 5.0 - - Pedestrian overpasses 3 0.3 4 0.4 - - Pedestrian stairways 6 0.6 9 0.8 - 111111111111011 Note:Crosswalks traversing roadways In the middle of long blocks and at street intersections should be provided with additional illumination am producing from 1.5 to 2 times the roadway illuminanco level recommended In Fig 14-6. See pages 14-2 and 14-3. •' For pedestrian identification at a distance. IES LIGHTING HAHMOOK 14-24 ROADWAY LIGHTING 1981 APPLICATION VOLUME Fig. 14-18. Recommended Maintained Illuminances for Open and Covered Parking Facilities Open Parking Facilities For Vehicular Traffic For Pedestrian Safety For Pedestrian Security Level of Activity Footcan- Uniformity Footcan- Lux, Foolcan- Unifoimtty dies* Ratio Lux. Lux" dies Low activity 5 0.5 4:1 2 0.2 9 0.8 5:1 Medium activity 11 1 3:1 6 0.6 22 2t High activity 22 2 3:1 10 0.9 43 4___- $ 1 Covered Parking Facilities Day --Night. _. Areas Lux"' Footcandles"' Lux' Fcwtcandlti�' 54 5 54 General parking and pedestrian areas 5 Ramps and corners 1 t 0 10 54 Entrance areas 540 50 Sa S Stairways and lobbys(refer to Fig. 2-2) - • Average on pavement ••Nlinimllm on rpvemrni a • IES LIGHTING HANDBOOK 1981 APPLICATION VOLUME Pedestrian Way. A public walk for pedes- trian traffic not necessarily within the right-of- way for a vehicular traffic roadway.Included are skvwalks (pedestrian overpasses). subwalks (pe- destrian tunnels), walkways giving access to parks or block interiors and midblock street crossings. Isolated Interchange. A grade separated roadway crossing which is not part of a continu- ously lighted system, with one or more ramp connections with the crossroad. Isolated Intersection. The general area ROADWAY, WALKWAY, BIKEWAY, AND where two or more noncontinuously lighted road- AREA CLASSIFICATIONS' ways join or cross at the same level. This area includes the roadwav and roadside facilities for traffic movement in that area. A special type is the channelized intersection in which traffic is Roadway, Walkway and Bikeway directed into definite paths by islands with raised Classifications curbing. Bikeway.A public street.highway or separate Freeway. A divided major roadway with full path. identified as part of a bicycle travel net- control of access and with no crossings at grade. work Bikeways may consist of the following- This ollowingThis definition applies to toll as well as nontoll 1. T►pe-A Bikeway. A strip within or adiacent roads. to a public roadway or shoulder. marked for Expressway. A divided major roadway for bicycle travel: through traffic with partial control of access and 2. Type B Bikeu m.An improved strip identified generally with interchanges at major crossroads. for public bicycle travel and located away from Expressways for noncommercial traffic within a roadway or its adjacent sidewalk system. parks and park-like areas are generally known as parkways. Major. The part of the roadway system that Area Classifications serves as the principal network for through traffic flow.The routes connect areas of principal Commercial. That portion of a municipality traffic generation and important rural highways in a business development where ordinarily there entering the city. are large numbers of pedestrians during business Collector.The distributor and collector road- hours. This definition applies to densely devel- ways serving traffic between major and local oped business areas outside. as w� asea con- roadways. him roadways. These are roadways used mainly for the central part of a municipality traffic movements within residential,commercial tains land use which attracts a relatively heavy and industrial areas- volume of nighttime vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic on a frequent basis. Local. Roadways used primarily for direct Intermediate.That portion of a municipality access to residential, commercial, industrial. or often characterized by a moderate)} heav} night- other abutting property. They do not include roadways carrying through traffic. Long local time pedestrian activity such as in blocks having roadways will generally be divided into short libraries, community recreation centers. farce sections ms by collector roadways steapartment buildings or neighborhood retail stores. Alleys. Narrow public wa}q within a block. Residential. A residential development. or a generally used for vehicular access to the rear of mixture of residential and commercial esmbhi h abutting properties. ments. characterized by a few pedestrians at Sidewalks. Paved or otherwise improved night. This definition includes areas with single areas for pedestrian use, located within public family homes. town houses and/or small snarl street rights-of-way which also contain roadways ment buildings. for vehicular traffic. !1•+'r i ;a �• 8� to :z '��r� � - _- 16 CN � • � e+��� `a I Q Ism 1 �;�IlluIN 7j . �• /� �1 - _m� ..ao u I 2 4 � I� �`tee �M� l — '° •_`'^ it l� Ind r Q tl — 1I Rt W. y F— J � eF- � ♦♦ -1l 'i � � �� �\,��� `fie �♦ n P' 1 ♦ 1 •i — N � Y,gN 1 ��• ell Ln 3AV Hl@8 Y \ IS to r4 1 �•n 2^t 1flr4 1 I u� n^ 1 3 tl Hlbd MS \ 3 i � t ea•v Z t 1 n P r4 k1 y 1 %co d l•2 6 W \ ♦♦`r 1 —+ 1 - I z� 0 •0 n n 1 In ti^ \ ____ —1 �L------- i - P. ry - ` I 3Av is b AS I ..Ci � r IOIl1n 1 nN 6 I v ti 7 1 BO- - ® -- e. 80_0 2-t-�•i r•••'' • t3Av CNr AS N 1 I � I U - 1 — I m 1 �yy D t C 1 .I U nn:4 1 P � •-- 14 �t-'---- C , CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 2, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: —October 23, 1987 ISSUE/AGEINDA_TITLE: Traffic Counts PREVIOUS ACTION: Related to Durham Road PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woo 1:1i�_/C_l DEPT HEAD OK,� Ci Y)ADMIN OTTZ7,?IT� REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Information from the County on the results of their counting of truck traffic. INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is the County's report on traffic counts which were conducted on various roads during three ono-week periods in August and September. On August 27th, signs were modified on Durham Road to prohibit through trucks over 20,000 pounds at all times. Prior to Augut;L 27th through trucks had been allowed between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. As the County indicates, the results are mixed arid show no clear impacts . From the data presented, 1. draw only the following general conclusions: 1. The volume of truck Lr,iffic on roads in our• <area varios considerably f-om week to week and from day to dtY- During week 1, 2. The time of peak truck traffic varies from day to day, the hours of peak truck traffic ranged from early morning to late night. 3. During week 1, when Lhrough trucks I, �re still allowed on Durham Road between 9 ca.m. and 3 p.m. , the peak hour of truck traffic on the various rads frequently occurred during Lhe gime period when Durham Road was open to through trucks. 4. The data for Cipolp Road is riot valid, since northbound traffic on Cipole was not counted on weeks 2 and 3. restrictions 5. From these counts, there is no evidence that the new truck res on Durham Road have resulted in any measurable increase in Lhe truck volumes on other roads in the region. 6. From testimony heard by the Council in July, we had concluded that roughly 100 trucks per day would be re-routed as a result of the new Durham Road truck restrictions. Apparently, these trucks have re-routed to a number of different roads so that the impact is not noticeable in the counts taken. Perhaps many of these trucks are now traveling through Tigard on Highway 99W, which was riot included in the County's traffic counts. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED This data is provided for your information. No action is required. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and file. br/1521D WASHINGTON COUNTY Inter-Department Correspondence October 15, 1987 TO: Bruce Varner, Director of Land Use and Transvo tation FROM: Jerry Green, Acting Operations Manager SUBJECT: TRAFFIC COUNTS--DURHAM ROAD Attached is a summary report and detail counts of truck traffic on five 1 roads in the Durham Road impact area. These counts were taken the weeks of of August 10th-17th, Au beforetandoth oneand weekeafterethesSeptemberthis ist year. This included two closing by Tigard to trucks. The results are mixed and don't show any clear impacts. Vhile three roads received significant increases in truck traffic from week 2 to week 3, they show a loss of trucks from week 1 to week 3. However, in all five locations the truck volume at peak time increased from week 1 to week 3 and in all but one from week 2 to week 3. JG:dp c: Dean Frazier i r t f b t F p{ 1 r F 0 t i ?RUCa CO 7,,? =?;-:iilS for OUFHAM ROAD ^- August I0-17, August 24`0, S.r�,,:__.,._-s----------__-- ----`-- _-- --- Di..S1E'i?IAL DIc:E1Sa?IAL DIc.S1EST:AL WS=R i -. t sr 7eE'a 3 VES3 i/--5- -.; :;..=_ - /1 _rp� 1N17!, //�� ga_ez a7 �L:.;_ /�.�� a1 /� 1_ �❑L n 3 xLL �+L.= 3 TOTAL HAR (1) ?N? ._Ab {:� ,D.AL ?LA3 (Il 7017-n - -°SAK �I1 ?C'.AJ ?LA3 (l) LD?A:, .—.... (a 16:......6.?---_-2.,---__-I7------,a.-____-I`' 4 773 20 2!6 ^ 416 4.4 399 43 337 :.: .1 .IV S�HS CI ND ^• SOUTSBCc:;D 565 84 306 :Y9 MOLERCAD �SWy 99 . . 6i9 - 98.----344 ---130 ` =214 - --3a i. 333 .. n0172BOUSD 317 49 N/A VAI -311 -49 N/A N/A -317 -49 0 0 -- --- SOUTHBOUND 301--- 49 - 344 — 130 - 43-- 81- 333 141 32 - 92- -11 11 EDT ROAD a TUALATiN EERWOOD 2828 311 1985 774 -843 463 2102 849 -726 538 117 75 EASTBOUND 1303 139 642 230 -666 91 608 238 -700 99 -34 8 -- __ - WESTBOUND --1520 --..112 - 1343 — :44-- .117 - -312 - 1494 6i1 ---:26 ----439 - --151 — 67— TALL BOULEVARD a SATTLER _1638 434 596 519 -1042 35 848 899 -797 415 252 380 "--"--- —NORT?30UND— 1083 1d7 214 174--=869 -lI3 419 36B =664--81 205I94— SOUT°BOUND 555 197 382 345 -173 148 429 531 -126 334 47 186 TUZL�TI ROAD 1i5?w _ --- -707 -- 105'----_•657 __.._572 --=50 -- -467 -- 621- —552— EASTBOUND 458 66 36, 268 -97 202 252 222 -206 156 -105 -46 WE$?BOUND 249 39 296--304 ---47 265, 369 330 120 --291 - 73 26 TOTES: (11 Peak counts reorase�t the Ectal fo -ihe leek frog each-indiiidcal - daily one-hour pe?% period. For pnzoses of this report,only truck vehicles are reported. ",rucks are defined -- - -- a; :tree-axle vehicles of at least 110" wheelbase length. Two-azle vehicles are cot .:ci:ded in these totals. _.-- . age No. 1 TRUCK COUNTS OR MULTI AXLE VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION LOCATION DIR DATE DATE DAY 2-AXLE 3-AXLE 4-AILE 5-AXLE 6-AXLE 7-AXLE PEAK PEAK IRON TO VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES HOUR VOL TRUCKS TRUCKS LOCATION BOONES FERRY WRIDGE PIT DIRECTION X/B BOORIS FERRY S/BRIDGE PIT S/B Oa/10/37 08/11/87 MON/TUE 597 41 37 6 1 2 1100/1200 11 BODIES PERRY S/BRIDG& PIT H/B 08/11M 08/12/87 TUSIVED 591 13 42 5 2 0 1600/1700 15 BOOKES TERRY SIBRIDGE PIT N/B 08/12187 OVUM VED.TRU 613 44 36 4 0 0 1600/1700 13 BOOKES FERRY S/BRIDGE PIT I/B 08113/97 08/14/87 THU/FRI 666 35 32 6 0 0 1200/1300 9 BODIES FERRY S/BRIDGE PIT I/B 08/14/87 08/15187 FRI/SIT 499 38 38 3 1 a 1200/1300 14 Subsubtotal 1 2956 201 185 24 4 2 62 DIRECTION S/B BOOKES FERRY $/BRIDGE PIT s/B 08/10/97 08/11/17 MON/TUE 107 51 43 4 2 1 1000/1100 15 BOOKES FERRY WRIDGE PIT S/B oa/11/87 09112/a7 TUMED 794 43 11 14 2 0 1200/1300 14 BOONE$ ?ERIY S/BRIDGZ PIT SIB 08/12/87 08/13/17 TED/THU 550 51 35 12 2 0 2100/2200 is BoolES FERRY S/BRIDG3 PIT S/B 08/13/87 08114/87 TRU/FRI 551 29 27 3 0 0 1600/1700 12 BooJES TERRY S/BRIDGE PRT S/B 08114187 08/15/87 FRIISIT 667 (4 43 7 0 0 1600/1700 20 BOONES FERRY S/BRIDGE PIT S/B 08/15187 08116/87 SkT/SUN 337 17 20 1 0 0 1100/1200 6 BODIES FERRY S/BRIDGE PIT S/B 08/16197 08/17187 SUI.NON 479 27 25 6 3 0 1000/1100 7 Subsubtotal 4111 269 234 52 9 1 99 Subtotal 7144 470 419 76 13 3 isi Page No. 1 09/28/87 TRUCK COUNTS OR MULTI AXLE VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION LOCATION DIR DATE DATE DAY 1-A%LE 3-A%LB 4-AXLE 5-AXLE 6-AXLE 7-AXLE PEAR PEAR FROM TO VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES TRUCKS TRIICKSUR VOL s� LOCATION C270LE RD S/EVY 991 = DIRECTION NIB10 B 5 090011000 14 CIPOLE RD S/IVY 991 NIB 08/10187 08111187 MON/TUE 183 115 8 CIPOLS RD S/H1Y 991 NIB 08/12/87 08/13187 1EDITHU 136 27 2 12 1 1 1600/1700 17 CIPOLE RD S/IVY 991 NIB p 0 0 1400/1500 6 CIPOLE RD SIH1Y 991 NIB 08/13/81 08/14187 THU/FRI 53 i0 0 3 9 0 2 110011100 8 CIPOLE RD 3/11T 991 NIB 08/14/87 08/15187 FR1ISAT 116 20 Subsubtotal = 695 230 18 43 14 12 49 + DIRECTION SIB8 5 6 1400/1500 11 CIPOLE AD SIH1Y 991 S/B O8/10/81 08111/87 NO5ITIIB 155 58 7 9 ] 4 0900/1000 15 CIPOLE RD S/H1Y 991 SIB 08/11/81 08/12/81 TUE/IED 118 1T 169 9 10 1 6 1000/1100 13 CIPOLE RD 51H?Y 99Y SIB 08/13/87 08114/87 THII/FRI SIB 08/12187 08/13/97 TED/TRU 109 14 1 4 3 2 130011400 10 ! CIPOLE RD 1 `• Subsubtotal s 611 114 16 31 12 1B 49 �� Subtotal se 1306 444 44 74 16 30 98 ?age No. 3 09/28/81 TRUCK COURTS OR MULTI AXLE VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION LOCATION DIR DATE DATE DAY 2-AXLE 3-AXLE 4-AXLE 5-AXLE 6-AXLE 7-AXLE PEAK PEAK FROM TO VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES HOUR VOL TRUCKS TRUCKS !� LOCATION EDT RD W/TUAL SHER RD DIRECTION E/B EDT RD W/TUAL SHER RD BIB 08/10/87 08/11/87 MOR/TUE 717 101 49 54 8 9 1100/1200 24 EDT RD W/TUAL SHER RD EIB 08/11/87 08/12/87 TOE/WED 664 86 46 53 7 11 1400/1500 24 EDT RD MULL SHER RD E/B 08/12/87 08/13/81 WED/THU 712 94 54 64 7 4 1600/1700 19 EDT RD MULL SHER RD EIB 08/13/87 08/14/87 THU/PRI 751 98 48 63 11 10 1000/1100 22 EDT RD MOIL SHER RD SIB 08/14/87 08/15/87 ?RI/SAT 618 96 55 56 10 5 1500/1600 22 EDT RD W/TU1L SHER RD EIB 08/15/81 08/16/81 SAT/SUN 446 45 31 14 1 2 1300/1400 14 EDT RD W/TU1L SHER RD EIB 08/16/87 08/11/87 SUN.MOK 414 63 38 14 1 0 1600/1700 14 Subsubtotal l 4322 583 321 319 45 41 139 DIRECTION Wil EDT RD W/TU1L SHER RD W/B 08/10/97 08/11/87 MON/TUE 778 109 43 79 6 9 1400/.1500 32 EDT RD MOLL $HER RD TIE 08/11/87 08/12/97 TO WED 743 112 50 61 9 10 1100/1130 22 EDT RD W/TUAL SHER RD W/B 08/12/87 08/13/87 WED/THU 797 101 51 71 10 11 1200/1300 25 EDT RD W/TU1L SEER RD W/B 08/13/87 OB/14/87 THU/FRI 814 97 53 77 9 8 1000/1100 29 EDT RD W/TULL SHER RD W/B 08/14/87 08/15/87 FRI/SAT 778 110 68 39 4 5 1400/1500 26 EDT RD W/TUAL SHER RD W/B 08/15/87 08/16/87 SAT/SUN 550 37 46 10 0 1 1200/1300 11 EDT RD W/TU1L SEER RD W/B 08/16/87 08/17/87 SUR/KON 716 1105 56 52 3 9 1300/1400 26 • Subsubtotal 5176 671 361 389 40 53 172 Subtotal 9499 1254 688 707 85 94 311 r 011mmum 11 11 011MENNAWANNOWN 11 MOM Page No. 4 09/28/81 TRUCK COUNTS OR MULTI AXLE VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION LOCATION DIR DATE DATE DAY 2-A1LE 3-11LE 4-11LE 5-11LE 6-1ILE 7-A%L3 PEAK PEAK FROM TO VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES HOUR VOL TRUCKS TRUCKS tt LOCATION HALL BLVD S/SATTLER t DIRECTION N/B HALL BLVDSISATTLER N/B 08/10/87 08/11/87 NON/TUE 519 129 20 2 3 0 1400/1500 24 HALL BLVD S/SATTLEY B/B 08/11/87 08/12/87 TUE/SLED 518 135 21 4 0 0 1600/1700 20 HALL BLVD S/SATTLEY B/B 08/12/87 08/13/81 9ED.THU 772 92 42 3 0 1 0800/0900 20 BALL BLVD WITTLEY H/B 08/13/87 08/14/87 TRU/FRI 660 147 338 10 2 5 1300/1400 202 HALL BLVD S/51TTLE1 B/B 08/14/87 08/15/87 FYI/SAT 479 40 15 1 1 0 1600/1700 9 HALL BLVD S/SITTLER H/B 08/16187 08/17/87 SUN/MON 200 18 20 0 0 0 1600/1700 7 HILL BLVD S/SITTLEY I Subsubtatal s 3160 582 469 20 6 6 287 = DIRECTION SIB HALL BLVD S/SATTLEY SIB 08/10/87 08/11/87 HOB/TUE 173 47 7 0 0 0 1000/1100 14 BALL BLVD S/BATTLER S/B 08/11/87 08/12/87 TUE/YED 557 152 32 0 1 0900/1000 21 i BILL BLVD SISITTLER SIB 08/12/87 08/13/87 VENTED 611 79 15 3 0 1 1300/1400 22 HALL BLVD S/SITTLER SIB 08/13/87 08/14/87 TRU/FRI 590 41 25 7 1 0 500 58 70 HILL BLVD S/SITTLEY SIB 08/14/87 08/15/87 FRI/SAT 516 34 26 3 0RILL BLVD S/SITTLE1 0 1600/1100 HALL BLVD S/SITTLEY SIB 08/16/87 08/17/81 SUM1M0>; 329 23 20 1 0 0 1000/1100 6 Subsubtatal ! 197 3084 391 137 23 2 2 s4 Subtotal !� 8 484 5544 973 606 43 i Page No. 5 09/22/37 TRUCK COUNTS OR MULTI AXLE VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION DIR DATE DATE DAY 2-AXLE 3-AXLE 4-AXLE 5-AXLE 6 -AXLE 7-AXLE PEAK PEAK IuCATION VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES VEHICLES HOUR VOL FROM TO TRUCKS TRUCXS Y 3* LOCATION TUALATIN RD E/115TH AVE t DIRECII04 E/B 1 2 1500/1600 11 TUALATIN RD EJ II STH AVE E/B 0:/10/37 03/11/37 MoN/TUE 410 41 15 16 4 1 140011500 13 TUALATIN RD E/11ST4 AVE E/B 03/11/87 03/12/37 TUE/DIED 453 3V 5 0 0700/0200 3 TUALATIN RD EJ115T4 AVE EJS 03/12/37 02/13/37 S1ED/THU 455 3S 2. 4 4 0 1201;/1500 10 TUALATIN 4D E/115TH AVE EJ3 08/i�/37 03J!�J37 iH�J(FRi 46 ;' S TUALATIN 3D E1i155H AVE EJ6 m.2!1;/37 0./15,13'• FRI/SAT i° 0 2 0 1`_00/1500 10 TUALATIN RD E/1!SiH AVE E/B 03/15/37 031'!6/37 SAT/SU;1 200 i� 19 4 0 0 i7.GO/!400 5 TUALATI11 RD E/115TH AVEC E/B 03/16/87 03/17/31 SUN/MON 353 37 16 1 2 1200/1300 9 = Subsubtotal 12636 232 141 58 22 5 66 f DIRECTION W/B 10 TUALATIN RD E/115TH AVE WJB 02/10/37 09/11/37 MON/TUE 440 36 24 5 0 1 0900/1000 TUALATIN RD E/115TH AVE W/B 03/11/37 03/12/37 TUEJWED 469 33 14 S 1 1 0300/0900 10 0 0300/0900 9 TUALATIN RD E/115TH AVE W/S 03/12/87 08113/37 WED/THU 423 32 B 03/13/21 08/14/37 THU/FRI 462 33 24 6 3 0 0900/1000 10 TUALATIN RD E/118TH / 3 Subsubtotal t 1794 139 84 19 5 2 39 Subtotal x# 4420 371 225 77 27 7 105 ss.r Total =i# 26972 3512 1982 977 159 142 1149 CITY �F 71GARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 2, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: October 26. 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Tigard/Tualatin PREVIOUS ACTION: Bridge Report PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole L DEPT HEAD OK' CITY ADMIN OK 1. REQUESTED BY: Mayor Brian POLICY ISSUE A preliminary feasibility report on the possibility of a future additional bridge connection between the cities of Tigard and Tualatin. INFORMATION SUMMARY In July, following a joint meeting of the City Councils of Tigard and Tualatin, we were asked to explore the feasibility of providing an additional roadway connection between the two cities. In response, attached is a report prepared by Gary Alfson, our new transportation engineer. THIS IS A VERY PRELIMINARY REVIEW. 17 IS NOT A PROPOSAL FOR ACTION. IT IS INTENDED ONLY TO ASSIST THE CITIES IN DECIDING WHETHER ANY OF THE ALTERNATE ROUTES SHOULD BE GIVEN FURTHER CONSIDERATION IN PLANNING FOR FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS. Alternate A (85th Avenue) appears to have the greatest potential benefit as an important link in the transportation system. It would connect two important existing north-south through streets — Hall Boulevard in Tigard and Boones Ferry Road in Tualatin. Both of these existing streets already serve as arterials and widening of both is already a part of the long-range planning. Alternate A would provide a direct connection to the High School and ' would provide the greatest traffic relief on Upper Boones Ferry Road through the City of . Durham. Unfortunately, Alternate A is the most expensive alternate, due largely to conflicts with the existing railroad. Alternates B and C have potential for extension southward in Tualatin. However, existing residential development precludes their direct connection with a through north-south route in Tigard. If either of these alternates is pursued, it will be critical to carefully consider their impacts on existing development and traffic patterns on both sides of the river. Alternates D and E would create substantial adverse impacts on existing single-family residential areas. The alignments of Alternates D and E would not appear to provide any substantial relief to traffic volumes on existing streets. Therefore, further consideration of Alternates 0 and E is not recommended. ----- - ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED This report is a step in planning for the future transportation system. if any alternate appears to have merit, that alternate should be given further consideration through the usual local and regional transportation planning processes. Through that process, plans would be evaluated for possible inclusion in the appropriate comprehensive transportation plans. FISCAL IMPACT Very rough cost estimates are included in the report. Fiscal impacts would be considered as part of the more detailed planning process. We would need to evaluate the potential for State or Federal funding. SUGGESTED ACTION I recommend that this staff report be shared with the cities of Tualatin and Durham, with �. Washington County, with our Transportation Advisory Corrmittee, and with other interested groups. If informal discussions with the other jurisdictions show interest in one or more of the alternates, staff would then prepare a reconmendation on how to proceed into the more detailed planning process. cs/1519D Alternate C• Construct 103rd Avenue from Durham Road along the back of the existing residential development connecting to the existing Jurgens Road alignment, and improve Jurgens Road to Tualatin Road. The impact of this alignment would be minimal since most of the residential zoned areas are all presently undeveloped except for the portion south of Durham Road. This alternative is the most centrally located between Highway 99W and Boones Ferry Road. Due to the narrow floodplain band, the impact on the floodway would be minimized. The estimated total cost of this alternate would be from 9 to 12 million dollars. This includes 1700 lineal feet of street improvement, 2000 lineal feet of new street, nine intersections, 300 feet of elevated roadway, 1200 feet of bridge and 200,000 square feet of right-of-way acquisition. This alternate would connect a light industrial zoned area in Tualatin to Durham Road, possibly creating increased traffic levels on Durham Road. Alternate D: Improve and construct 108th Avenue from Durham Road to Hazelbrook Road, and improve Hazelbrook Road and Jurgens Road to Tualatin Road. The impact to properties would be substantial since most of the adjacent properties are zoned residential and a small portion is developed. 108th Avenue is currently classified as a minor collector and would have to be i upgraded to a major collector. Intersections with Hazelbrook Road and 103rd Avenue would be created requiring controlled 900 intersections. the estimated total cost of this alternate would be frum 7.5 to 10 million dollars. This includes 4900 lineal feet of street improvement, eleven intersections, 400 lineal feet of new street, 300 lineal feet of elevated street, 950 lineal feet of bridge and 125,000 square feet of right-of-way acquisition. An alternate to this alignment would be to extend 108th through to Tualatin Road. This would be more expensive, requiring new street and full width right-of-way acquisition, instead of improving the existing Hazelbrook Road and Jurgens Road. Alternate E• Improve and extend 113th Avenue from Durham Road across Hazelbrook Road to Tualatin Road. This alternative is through mostly low density zoned residential properties and is located fairly close to highway 99W. Relocation of the most westerly mobile hones or the residences east of the mobile homes may be required. It aould connect an Industrial Park zoned area in Tualatin to Durham Road possibly increasing traffic on Durham Road and serving as a frontage road to Highway 99W. The floodway is the narrowest of all five alternatives and therefore, this alternative has the least impact to the floodway and lowest total cost. i The estimated total cost of this alternate would be 7 to 9 million dollars. This includes 4200 lineal feet of new street, ten intersections, 200 lineal feet of elevated street, 800 feet of bridge and 250,000 square ` feet of right-of-way acquisition. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING To accurately define the most feasible alternate a more detailed preliminary engineering study would be required. The study would evaluate the top alternatives, presenting pros and cons of each, to determine the most feasible route. The study would then evaluate the best alternative in greater detail to determine the proper alignment, total construction cost, lengths of new street, improved street, elevated street and bridge, &=nt of right-of-way acquisition, and associated utilities and structures. The study would outline the hydraulic analysis required and define the type of bridge and elevated roadway to be used. A traffic analysis would also be performed to evaluate the effects of traffic from the new road on the existing roads. The total cost for the preliminary engineering study is estimated to be 50,000 to 75,000 dollars. br/1143D/70 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 70: Randy Dooley. City Engineerq6C ctober 19, 1987 FROM: Gary Alfson, Transportation Engineer SUBJECT: Tigard/Tualatin Bridge I have evaluated the possibility of constructing a street/bridge across the Tualatin River, connecting Tigard and Tualatin between the existing bridges on Highway 99W and Boones Ferry Road. There are a possible five alternate routes available as shown on the attached sheet. The alternate routes were selected using existing road alignments and right-of-ways. Alternate "A" and alternate "C" appear to be the most favorable routes. Alternate "A" is an extension of Hall Boulevard and has the least impact to the existing development and to traffic on Durham Road and Tualatin Road. Alternate "C" has a lesser total cost, has only a slight impact to the existing development and is more centrally located. The five alternate routes are listed below. Each alternative was evaluated based upon its impact to adjacent properties, zoning, traffic and the river floodway. The total cost was estimated based on unit costs for new major collector street, possible Intersections. elevated street across the floodplain and a bridge across the floodway. Costs were also included for engineering, administration and legal fees, contingencies, and right-of-way acquisition. A range in the estimated total cost was provided since this study was brief and very little field work was performed. Roa0way lengths and alignments were determined from maps and aerial photographs. Attached is an aerial photograph of the area showing the five alternate routes chosen for this study. Alternate A: Extend Hall Boulevard (85th Avenue) south from Durham Road, connecting to Tualatin Road along the Burlington Northern Railroad. The impact to properties would be minimal, since the areas are undeveloped and the proposed location is adjacent to the railroad. Its location adjacent to the railroad would also lessen the impact on the floodway. If this railroad is abandoned, the street could be located directly on the railroad right-of-way, decreasing the cost of improvements by 0.5 million dollars and the impact to the floodway. The extension of Hall, just north of Tualatin Road, would require crossing the existing, elevated east-west Southern Pacific Rail Road tracks. An underpass would must likely be required. The total cost for this alternate is estimated to be from 14 to 17 million dollars. This includes approximately 2900 lineal feet of new street, five intersections, 2600 lineal feet of elevated street, 600 lineal feet of `! bridge and 321,000 square feet of right-of-way acquisition. Alternate B: Improve and extend 92nd Avenue through Cook Park, and along the west border of the Tualatin Country Club to Tualatin Road. The impact to properties would be significant, especially to the Country Club and the residential development on the Tualatin side of the river. f Having a major collector type road through Cook Park would also not be k desirable. The bridge length required is much longer than that required in i Alternate "A", due to the increased floodway width. The estimated total cost for this alternate would be from 13 to 16 million dollars. This includes approximately 1800 lineal feet of pavement improvements, 2000 lineal feet of new street, five intersections, 1050 lineal feet of elevated street, 1500 lineal feet of bridge and 120,000 square feet of right-of-way acquisition. Two less attractive alternate routes of this alignment would be to construct the street straight through the County Club or to curve the bridge west, connecting to Shawnee Trail. The total cost of each alternate would be comparable to the above route but would have an increased impact onto the adjacent properties. ,.i I t�D?�S1 MEN DA 443 A s �j 1..2 L t4 d1f MAP _ I+It1� Ile 11+ rte etr +Ir rtl rtl ett It1 Itr I�r Iji 1 P 1 6 I 1_ I I - � �n�m�1t�.�t��11�tig�t+L���11IIt11'tT�tjllitlllt(pt'III+lettlel+'+iTl�t+�+lel+I+ +I+l+i'1+lsIV+�+ll�+l+1+lll111111fit NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED .._--. . ) 2 .3 4 _.. _ 5 s_ _ I7 B 9 1�a 4. DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN �� THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL ' DRAWING. OE 62 8Z LZ 9Z SZ 4Z SZ ZZ IZ OZ 61 BI LI 91 51 bl EI ZI II 01 6 _ 8 L 9 - S b t Z I"it� tnd I + amu+iieggNluuetNttnllHildtMiuMI111+NitLM+fLiiftlnibltnrlemhn+#mfEeae#++� uMl►!deMi<tru ,�ki,elx+f�••�+ee+ 49It3 IHhu+lm Inn Mnhm�a+l MAR RCH; 7 7 ! 191990 �_ .. �t, �� ,. .. • Tom• ,. ., � �. • �7.. I '� _ ..� l-'fit' ti•. ^, � ,..+ '•« `f 7' _.:1 i x'�. � --•t` .. °,*� - y��� ' � :,t .« "� � 3,,:r' A'"�;;\ �� a at .R. S�'"'"�. '• 1�,� � m gv*_:u9°,� � vy �� ",'r ... _ ,,•`1'�• "yam .>.` \` - , ,�� r —y'' \ t: 4.,.s .r.P .w .::r:b^t,� ^ " II. -. _ �hla�.�•__�_ 90!' �F '.4- ••+ « \' �.�1 � t :• ' y� ��'-J+ �i>'r-uc'� ".f:- c_i �r� [s�"'0' .+ — !r `7 �A �.�',� _-. _ � '��.,' -.'C 1�k.-.. _ •..1�'�' J,.. '�� j'.� ...-- ..- • � 0 w .L'S;� `.� �'�„••t• 0 4,i.`-+�.,�" ..;j• ;'-¢?� "1�v�'V :'aha. r ••s_^.�Y < clV� ,y� � .....+"':.'t �� i.4, ,'� ' �,,,• „�.'jl. 'ti.�'. ` ..;f�. --F.,,..,�,,w^-;`> ,>r •�+- e-_ t .I","'t' �, D.Ut�3 k,Ril .tF'"'k-0_ y�� - �,r w y. t' •fir _. 1 ;+ "' �'".f]'.T'at'S, - t -� g" '" ''• .�`� '�" � -- '► 'sY'' z Za4'z�^`�F r _ �.rKy!!' .'�;' Q _ ~ G ':ase;�,• •;�' �,u ,�= v _ .�..s- � •4 � �"F � - �� i'�. it 1,,:- ,1� r - - 4 Irf ru' v UT- .' 1� tea; OY.: t 'tee.aw.." •.. a�b3v; � ��; ..-rs.r j �4,•;v"���v`, .••.. k x � SYS� ` i - �•�'`-�- '"'� �:r�n, 'P*... - :�� ..,t .t "�� xy••,4 _• ..+1�_ _ ,-+,neem. _ • I jr II III II I'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIIIIII1I IIIA IIII'III`III',�.',lll.(I�l.�lll'1il'IIII1:11.11IIIIIIIII'''I lilllillrlllll111Il II IIII«I�'I III�III IIIIIIIIIIIIII�I VIII IIIIIIIII�IIIII II II'.'I1I i.I l'IIL'I.�.. - _. NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED I 3 4 I 5 6 7 g g I1� ISI i2Ok AV DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN ' THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO ! THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. OE 6Z 9Z LZ 9Z SZ 4Z £Z ZZ IZ OZ 61 91 LI 91 51 bbl EI ZII III ' 0'1 1 6 9 L 9 S I, E IZ I�•�� ou�uulluIIunIuu�uu6RI�uuIIsn�ImIIIl1IntlllUlluu�ulllll�lIu>tII�nlh�!�Iiu�IIUI UJllIIIIIIIU!!IullllllylIuIIUIIUll�N�IllllllJllnlnlllllfll11Wi11111111W1WU9ll1L911IlutlunllullunLudnuluuI uluuhWII ( i�(UIIIll�IllIIIWIIIH MARCH 7 , 1990 1� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 2 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: October 22 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: LCRB — Renewal PREVIOUS ACTION: of Liability Insurance Coverage _ PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson DEPT HEAD OK CI-fy ADMIN OKREQUESTED BY: Jill Mle ony POLICY ISSUE The Local Contract Review Board has determined policy as set out in the Tigard Purchasing Manual. INFORMATION_SUMMARY Our existing liability coverage expires November 5, 1987. Every year at this time our Agent of Record, Leonard Adams Company, collects and compares proposals for liability coverage. This is in accordance with Section 10.070 of the Tigard Purchasing Manual rules. There are basically only two agencies who ar-e writing public sector liability at this time: J.G. Newman Co. $77,300.00 LCIS Program $81,959.96 Attached are summaries of their proposals. Stato law require^_, the listed cover•agei; except t:he umbrella which is prudent to maintain in our litigious society. This $1,000,000 umbrella costs $15,000 and is included in the above amounts. J.G. Newman Co. has been covering Tigard for many years for essentially the same coverage. Cost to the City is $4,600.00 less than CCI.S. The 1987/88 budget allowed $100,000 for both liability, property and casualty insurances. Property insurance for the year will be $7,500 leaving $92,500 for liability. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve bid award to J.G. Newman Company and authorize the City' s Agent of Record, Leonard Adams Company, to make payment for the purpose_ of stake required liability coverage and a $1,000,000 umbrella, upon the completion of posting of the LCRB ordinance approved on 11/2/87. 2. Award bid to J.G. Newman Company through Leonard Adams Company and authorize payment for the purpose of state required liability coverage only without the unbrella. 3 . Go bare. J FISCAL IMPACT 1. Alternative 1. $77,300.00 2. Alternative 2. $62,300.00 3. Unknown SUGGESTED ACTION Alternative #1 . — Motion to award bid to JG Newman Company and authorize the City's Agent of Record, Leonard Adams Company, to make payment for liability �- coverage costing $77,300, upon the completion of posting of the LCRB ordinance approved on 11/2/87. lw/1515D fy S yF 6 tr Itk�1 t� c xkg :��'�c.r'.iii•.~ �y�ily �M �i f� 1 I, J INSURIUCE PROPOSAL ComVercial Liability Package Noventer 5, 1987 1988 City of Tigard po Box r' Tigard, Oregon 97223 Coverages Caq=ebensive General Liability covering Tort Iiahilities; incl suits in Federal Courts of SeC 1983, 1985 a premises • operations subcontractors liability products and conpleted opexatIons IKI personal injury liability including .J,. false arrest battery,assault & •iri discrimination false detention or imprisorment prosecutionlicious •• s (•� wrongfulor - •invasion of privacy ��• �tf.��:.. legalpunitive damages criminal defense volunteers inclusion liability •1 impounded properties ..': malpractice for Muls, police, fire & ambulance, nurses & MD's attorney fee coverage :;+,i_• Limitof .aility: 100,000/300,000 Bodily Injury i, 1 f11 /1 111 Property Damage 11 deductibleLimit cooplies: with Oregoin Tort ,fc '1` W u int` t �. F �.�� 1 -.. yx �, - i 5�1 t "� 3" �` r �� S• , � ,r. t Y f� f 1 0 } �' L r }d ' 4 1�f i * � �i � -�� r t� Y.3 L r i y': rl '." I r - _ '?f A ,` 1 .v,._ .. ♦ .�:i' 1��� a� E � 1 Y f F �•�; a r s'k a J t 1 1 111 •• 1_1 .•- 11 •c• • - y ,• 'hr(),,t� S 111 � N. (•• i" s y+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ♦ • 1 i{;• da . f 1 1 •.i• ale tQawa .• - .:� BSc i.J�."'r r oe !.r .i r u E q { •„ir 1�: y r s '� • ..• I � i i 11 ! I., 1 1 • .-..il 1 1 x y r., )' ,y,.. 1 S1 t .,{ f :. a �. t. t„' s-�.t• t i 1 u �- � t � r f' r/ ..wrFy r}r-J y ��r.� .c._�r - a`!. 7.�+k, :� r ' > .�; .. :1f �'�}. ...: srN K v ..:.� .at'<'�.. ✓�..� r �._ ._ '�'`?. ..r _... r, rt ..,.. .. .. ... 6 J. a j` ' J1f t{ it r' Y' r Y.;. .•' � '; 3 r A tl ear. • .•_' ;? rt _.,t. .: • M1 J ^• f � r••. •1 1 � ,' 1 Nv y { F a� ) i 7 J,r. �. •• •'.'...3 - a, 1 • • 11 -111 :•• ry 1.1 ,.•— tr - 11 111 1 a• • s _ 4 } 11 •,�• • ••: • - - d Jft t a ''J)�k tial • �. -!�:'J r • _• Ili 111 � f;J f I 1 I' i t r �'• +' r f r 3 t `f �''•'t � :i ) -r Jr . S Sy. S �.. p 1..i f1 W Yyy�� J /{' ) � ri� ^X.il ,r r F �3 ll •.'tel Y�• ,.`•:::: - b , IfY". r" ih •• 11 11 S 1 11 •f 11 111 — - •f1 111 111 111 �' tel' 1 r• ♦ • ,J. - __ {...�� 1•• � ♦.,�• • •♦- ter- �•� N�,d-`' - •.zr • • '/ I 1 '1 1 •I .„rte, F. yal ea> _ f � } L.,C. lb + �At T k• i. ?s t V Mt M�.:'v �I fr ..'JrF }�.. 33. {” A r Y.�'J'�1.eL� �-�� 'ups✓�.. q *< 3 1 -..�� tt : -:r y,1-..1.4 ✓. k � :�:K �f +'r...�.'`t{ rt )' i ,�:.. r k ....s� `� ,. � .. ..�,. � 1 S'?d, > �t �.'j:,., ! 1•p,;'... .i°!';'4 k� ,. , s t f , Y{•s:, .y ''� i p v--'� ?.rF�J''Y CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 2, 1967 DATE SUBMITTED: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: _Training Request PREVIOUS ACTION: for Public Works Management: Seminar G� PREPARED BY: Randy Wooled -_ ,�T' DEPT HEAD OK 1Lj!�2^CI1YADMIN OK -� REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Training request for the City Engineer to attend Lhe Public Works Management Seminar. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City Engineer proposes to attend a seminar in Public Works Management sponsored by the American Public Works Association. The seminar will be in Phoenix from December 7 -•- 10. Attached is a brochure describing the seminar. Council approval's requested. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the training request. 2, Deny the training request. FISCAL IMPACT The estimated cost is $1,113 including travel.. Funds for training are included in the Community Development Administration budget. SUGGESTED ACTION Council approval is requested. cs/1537D - C17YOFTIGAIM EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: 10/26/87 Requested by: R. Wooley Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: [ X ] Employee request attend [ ] Employer required attend For check run of [ ] Mail check [ J Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. : Vendor No. : PAYABLE T0:Ameri a Public Works AssocXAYABLE TO: =aaaxaaas¢accaaanaaaaaa=masaaanaacccaaaaa=nocsccacvaacccca=c.a3oaaaaaaaa=aaaatc Title of Program: Public Works Management Seminar Institution or organization American Public Works Assoc. Registration Deadline 12/1/ Training Dates From: To: Describe the purpose: Training in management of public works programs. Is this related to [ X] current position [ X ] reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: TRAINING COSTS: [ J to be advanced [ ) to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount _ Registration or tuition... ..... .......... ...... . 10-2010-67.500 445.00 Books.. ................ . .. ....... ... Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.)... . 10-2010-62400 228.00 Lodging................. .. ..... . ............. ... 10-2010-62400 340.00 Per Diem.................... ... . ..... ...... .... . 10-2010-62400 100.00 Other: Total $ 1,113.00 ac.ss.caa=.c aacaaaaaaaaaaaaaac=xac�csaaacs=cc=ac=aaaoc====aa.aa..c.c.aaaaacvaac f Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditui s de o ' f. y behal Employee Signature: _ �r l ( Date � t J Appropriation balance: Manager: [ ) approved [ ] disapproved Dept. Head: '!lIVIs [ ] approved [ ) disapproved (explain): t w� [ Finance Director: r t 111111' Pill i .ate►. �i `���'rs, r� t � ff d Y t � � ���*titer` ' •. k ty, q��� . , ate, �►- ,� � +..} � � �:;k tr r r_..F.'' .. �' .,s..~` J � " "r'""�_'<. '`a t•4i...sj'r--;� ..,Y .+`y+�F....a��1'.a 1 • ��... tw �� �+tt ,,yt >` ,.� ` t ��� 9 About-the Seminar "The Public Works Management Seminar" is a com- prehensive,intensive four-day seminar designed to provide practical instruction which will keep today's managers on the Monday,December 7 "cutting edge"of their profession. 8:00 am Seminar Registration 9:00 am Seminar Welcome and Introductions The seminar addresses four objectives which are vital 9.30 am Seminar Objectives and Schedule importance to the success of public works management PERSONAL MANAGEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PROBLEM! personnel: (1)To provide public works management per- 9:45 am Management Issues Today sonnel with a working knowledge of current management An o gn discussion of the blems facing t theory and practice: (2) To improve essential manage- ment skills for providing leadership, effective com- day's public works manager...and the op. munications,motivation,and employee relations in a public portunities to solve the problems works organization;(3)To broaden public works managers' 10:30 am Break historical perspective; and (4) To provide a greater 11:00 am Stress and the Public Works Manager t, understanding of current social,political,and economic in- Sources of stress—from birth through a fluences affecting public works agencies, public works profession 12:15 pm Lunch(on your own) Who Should Attend This seminar is designed for public works commis- 1:30 pm More Stress. .. sioners, directors, department heads, and other upper The complexities of lho problem management personnel who are responsible for plan- 2:45 pm Break ning, budgeting, staffing, and operations within their 3:15 pm Managing Stress—Effectively organizations. Positive approaches to dealing with stress, and increasing personal performance Course Materials Each participant will be provided a workbook containing 4:30 pm Summary and Wrap-up all course outlines,selected readings,and a bibliography developed specifically for managers in public works It is intended that the workbook will serve the dual purpose of Tuesday,December 8 . providing all the material for the seminar as well as serv- THE MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENT ing as a valuable resource/reference tool in the future. 9:00 am Public Works and Policy Makers An elected official's view of ft ways in which effective working relationships can be Continuing Each participant in the seminar will receive 2.5 Continu- developed Education Units ing Education Units (CEUs) from the APVNJA Education 10:15 am Break Foundation. CEUs. are nationally recognized units of and Certificates 10:45 em Resolving Professional—Poilt�al keaaras achievement which may be used as evidence of increas ed performance capabilities and for job advancement. Case probterns in creating better relationships The Education Foundation maintains a permanent record with policy makers of CEUs earned. 11:45 am Lunch(on your own) 1:00 pm Building Community&Poflticaf Support 4 A certificate of participation, suitable for framing, will be Good examples of offective ways of presentinig awarded by the APWA Education Foundation to all and ding your programs seminar participants. 2.30 pm Break - 2:55 pm How To Get Your Mass"Across Local Coordinator Without the help of Local Coordinators representing the Giving a speech...a greater fear than snakes Chapter it would not be possible for the Education 3:45 pm Break Foundation to conduct the Continuing Professional 4:00 pm Developing Public Works Managers Education Series. A look at the sources and probk-ma in building a prolessional organization in a Representing the Anzona Chapter is William(Bill)*,apolitical climate long,, a Senior Engineer,Municipal Designers 8 Consultants,LTD., po 5:00 p Casa Grande,Arizona. pm Summary and Wrap-up Seminar Faculty Clyde A.Burke,President,Burke&Associates,Inc.,Aurora, Dr.Steve Martin,President,Steve Martin, Inc.,Winston. WWI Colorado. Mr. Burke has broad experience in preparing, Salem,North Carolina. Mr. Martin has a long track record for organizing and conducting management seminars for public of exceptional performance in management seminars works officials,including direction of the"management"por- throughout the United States and Canada.In addition to serv- of tion of the APWA Street Maintenance Management Work- ing on the seminar staff, he has conducted considerable Shop and direction of several management seminars spon- amounts of research into human stress and stress manage- � sored by the International Road Federation and international meat:for several years was on the staff of the Menninger ex Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Foundation; and is a former Vice President of the Union nat Theological Seminary in Richmond,Virginia. Aft de Dr.D.L.Howell,former Chairman.Department of Manage- Larry D.Miller,President of Productivity Through People, ment and Marketing, University of Mississippi, University, a management consulting firm located in Arizona.Mr.Miller Ma Mississippi. Dr.Howell directs or participates in numerous has more than twenty years on-the-job experience as a leader A management seminars for a broad variety of private and gov- in the fields of engineering,business,and professional sports. A emmentaf agencies,in addition to his academic responsibili. He specializes in programs for the development of leader- ties,he is nationally recognized as an expert in employee moti. ship and marketing skills. Mr. Miller holds a B.S. in Civil ca vation and human relations.He also serves as Director of the Engineering from the University fo Kansas and a M.S.in Civil 9 National Highway and Transportation Institute for AASHTO. Engineering from Arizona State University. tin ® ® A A ULE Comments from The"Public Work:Management Seminar"affords an excel- Previous Participants lent opportunity 6)share a wealth of information with your colleagues,both i,i a formal and informal environment.It was Wednesday,December 9 one of the best organized seminars 1 have ever attended.. . PEOPLE AND PERFORMANCE James O.Hamm,Project Manager,Dallas Water Utility,City 9:00 am Performance and the Manager's Role of Dallas,Texas Some of the keys to improving performance in spite of limited funds 1 found this seminar much more than anticipated.Attendees were successfully motivated to actually participate. All the 9:45 am Break speakers were"Top Notch"and professional,never once did 10:15 im Motivation they lose my interest. I believe attendance at this seminar, A detailed look at what makes people tick and I attended marry, was truly cost beneficial...Richard 11:45 am Lunch(on your own) D. Roberts,Superintendent,Pollution Control Department, City of Solon,Ohio 1:00 pm When Positive Motivation Breaks Down... The menagement seminar provided me with management Creating an effective work environment training needed to successfully compete for a higher manage- ment position.During the six months after the program,I was 2:30 pm Break prornoh�d from Senior to P.inciple Engineer to Assistant Direc- 3:00 pm Managing People for of Public Vtbrks...Bruce Burrnvorth,Assistant Director of Testing your skills in managing people Public Works/City Engineer,Santa Barbara,California 5:00 pm Break Excellent seminar—Good refresher to impram management 6:00 pm Hospitality Hour(Cash Bar) skills...leadership,effective communication and motivation. 7:00 pm Seminar Banquet Superb seminar staff...dynamirw knowledgeable humorous. "Public Works Management—Today 6 Valuable for mid to upper public works management person- Tomorrow" nel...William G.Chamberlin It,Senior Administrative Officer, Banquet Speaker Public tivoft Department,Orlando,Florida At the time of the seminar, I had been in the public works Thursday,Decemt}sr 10 arena for less than a year It was my first formal exposure to employee motnntion training and rnanagemOnt theory I found kMANA(UNG FOR TOMORROW the material extremely helpful and a confidence builder.. . 9.00 am Taking Chargel David L.Vaughn,AIA,City Architect.Tampa. Florida. Characteristics of effoctw leadership...for tomrrorrow Since 1 have over 30 goers of management experience and t0 tb am Break training(an MBA in management)I was pleasantly suprised that this'aki dog..foamed new management skills.The panel 10.45 am Taking Chsrgel...Pwt Two of presenters was the best 1 have ever had the priviledge to Tomorrow's public works edrrinistrato needs /hear —ra superb rb experience. Division,..Duane E. VandeFlorinberg. to distinguish between leading and managing.••now I fond the seminar to be very well organized and the 11:30 am Scheduled Luncheon speakers to be well qualified.I received great benefits from 12:30 pm Building The Management Team the whole week and recommend that everyone in the public ief Plant ._._.._ ,._. Translating today's vision it tomorrow's works field Wastewater Planteamiboat Springs, Colorado Operator, reality 1:30 pm Managing for Tomo.row The seminar's kxxrs on se fasseswx--d,eornmun t.and A quick look ahead—at the challenge`'in this people-to-people skills was a great refresher and motivator decade forme.The technical nature of our work too often dominates 2:30 pm Seminar Summary,Evaluation and Award- the little training time that is available. I hope to attend the Ing of CeRtfleates advanced session in the future...Rick Dime, Director of Public Services,Village of Orland Park,Illinois 3:00 pm Adjourn This seminar will provide YOU with an opportunity to: 0114 Morris,Vice President Public Finance Group •Receive the latest information on management techniques. nental Illinois Bank,Chicago,Illi)ois.Prior to joining tineental Illinois,Mr. Morris served as mayor for the city •Learn how to effectively deal with stress and convert negative stress into ukagan for over seven years.Prior to his election to that positive action. lie served as the youngest member of the Illinois State for two years.His governmental experience plus his •Get a first-hand view of a public official's view of public works issues. ience as a reporter and his expertise in the area of the 's infrastructure make him a speaker who is much in •Learn how to bund productive relationships with public officials. K.nd. •Explore new technology and automated systems. Van Deursen, Associate Executive Director. •Darn methods of increasing performance in spite of decreasing funds. Chicago.11 inois.Mr.Van Deursen has responsibility for A education and training programs and serves as •Learn how to motivate and manage people 1 Manager of the APWA Education Foundation.In this pry he oversees the.Foundation's in-service and .See the posit ive effects of team building and learn horn to turn your stall uate programs as well as the design of programs of con- into a"team" ng education io*public works officials. { l General Information • �s To Register:Early registration is recommended.Complete Fees:APWA individual members,employees of government g ® � and return the Registration Form below or,if it is less than units enrolled as either public agency or utility memb two weeks before the date of the seminar, telephone the APWA,and sustaining members of APWA,$445.00 Registrar at 1.312.667-2200.Ext.584.So that participants $593.00 CAN.Non-members fee is$490.00 U.S./$653.00 can receive an acknowledgement and participant packets CAN.This fee includes all instructional materials,refreshment can be prepared for each registrant,the registration deadline breaks, the Wednesday banquet and the scheduled fun. is three(3)working days before the start of the seminarcheon on Thursday.Other meals,lodging,travel,and per- sonal expenses are the responsibility of the participant. Location and Lodging:The seminar is being conducted ® in the conference facilities of the Stouffer Cottonwoods Resort, Note:Fees not paid in full or covered by a purchase order 6160 North Scottsdale Road,Scottsdale,AZ 85253. Con- by the start of the seminar will be assessed an additional e - tact the Stouffer Cottonwoods Resort directly(6021991-1414) $10.00 late fee. to make your lodging reservations.Be sure to mention that you are attending the APWA Public Works Management Cancellation Policy:A full refund will be granted if a re- Seminar to ensure obtaining the special APWA room rale fund request is received by telephone at 1.312.667.2200, of$85 singleldouble.Cut-off date for the special room block Ext.584,or in writing,at least three(3)working days before is November 7,1987. the start of the seminar. Later cancellations and no-shows s will be assessed a$30.00 service charge.APWA reserves A free continental breakfast accompanies your wake-up call. the right to cancel any seminar.All registrants will be notified For those arriving at the Phoenix airport a"Super Shuttle" of any cancellation at least three(3)working days before the is available which will take you directly to the Stouffer scheduled start of the seminar. Cottonwoods Resort.For those commuting to the seminar ample parking is available. Tax Deduction for Educational Expenses:In the United •-• • States an income lax deduction may be allowed for educa-tion expenses undertaken to maintain or improve professional • . • Schedule:The seminar begins with registration on Monday, skills. This includes registration,travel,meals,and lodging December 7 at 8:00 am.Classes will begin at 9,00 am.The (see Treas.Reg. 1.162.5)(Coughlin vs.Commissioners 203 • daily schedule has classes from 9:00 am-4.30 pm on Mon. F 2d 307). day; from 9.00 am-5:00 pin on Tuesday; from 9:00 am- 5:00 pm and from 6:00-9.00 pm on Wednesday;and from Mailing Lists:Since mailing lists cannot always be cross •' 9:00 am-3:15 pm on Thursday.There will be a mid-morning checked,you may receive more than one brochure.If you and mid-afternoon refreshment break each day. do, please pass it along to an Interested associate. .......r..�...+ (Please end abry hrw and return wtt,our rnaitrp Iatx!p A Convenient Way to Register Reglstration(a)at$445 U.S./$593 CAN. Fill out the form below and mail It to:APWA Education Foundation,P.O.Box 94310,Chicago. APWA Individual Members and/or IL 60678.4310. Make checks payable to: American Public Works Association. Public Agency Members of APWA and/or Public Utility Members of APWA and/or OR(If It is km than two weeks before the data of the seminar):Call 1-312.667.2200,ask for the Sustaining Members semirw rogistrac She vA register you by phone h you register by ply please have all the necessary information including Social Securityitnsurance number and Purchase Order number. Reglstratlon(s)at$490 U.S./$653 CAN, Non-Members Total$ - _.,.. _- - .- •- - -- • r ❑Check enclosed O Purchase order enclosed M Please register the following(If member,type name exactly as It appears on your U.S. Government form 1556 enclosed membership card) Name UP-COMING PROGRAMS!! (tart) (fret) (Mdtae) Liability in Public Works Management— Titie February 8.9, 1988 —Denver.CO Organization Microcomputers in Public Works— FebruaCommunication NV Public Works Paces— city State/Prov. Postal Code March 28.29, 1998—Phoenix, AZ Telephone (Area Code I (Ext) Public Works Procurement Practices— ) May 5-6, 1988— Los Angeles,CA. Social Security/Insurance Number (For CEU Registration) MARMON:It the person on the label is no longer wrokr d at ro-orga ninon pisas•mule dtis Now get the lowest available airfare to all APWA Education Foundation's 1967-1988 programs kdarmative brach"to iM replacamara or depart- The APWA Edxatim Founda;wt has arranged special guaranteed des- irntt be confirmed A tower tares are available.You can be ne-wced or you rpfracourts on d a-y artare on American Alec.and Crotine tial Arline arrf off can charge your bd cs 9 th which will be mailed io your home or business toad,fares on Eastern Ardaw.s.American oilers a t0%discount off of ary Carl the Airlines&act .. Rolla Mr. coach two or a Eta discount OR any prormonal tares(mdubng Supar- sewers)Convrental dons a t2%discoua ort Vie.b het;t coach tare(Y%and American Aeimes at 16rr0.4337780.identy yoursetl mh Star Nos 95 1. a 1%drscoura all their promotional fares.Eastern ANWMM offers a 130%dr,- cora of coach for as dome ter tags.and a 30%discount ort Commuter Contmental.'Ea,;an A+!mes at 7.W4Sb7022(Fiorda 14f,W202-02 2. algae Identity yourself-th EZ14FP25 I To recene the Ivrest an'are avadabie.swVy call the Arthne-best sueed b Ticketing w.11 De done by Gug avel counselor Serine.333 N.Mcran Ave. H this meams label is hot eorr•ct, pN•ss your deme re cey and make your reservation for any.. 20 tee Always ask Suite 5 .Chicago.IL 60601.(312)726.2108 6etlitafe the Owng�YOU laud On dor 18W. tor the ioaesf avaAaw aetare on any Arkm Resenrat ons on other airimes lisift a do not remoMa the address tabor. TICB�Y.C�G� IqL CITY OF TIGARD /O Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Concerning Case Numbers)• S 8-86, V 9-86 (Final Order 86-15PC) 2. Name of owner: Samuel A. Gotter III 3. blame of Applicant: Same Address 9541 SW Inez St. City Tigard State OR Zip 9722 4. Location of Property: Address Between the western end of Inez St. & 97th Ave. Tax Map and Lot No(-.). (WCTM 2S1 11AC lot 2700) 5. Nature of Application:Me modify conditions 8 and 9 of Finald Order 86-15 PC to allow�t a termination of the southern sidewalk on—Inez St. on the-Tigard Sc ol District property and the elimi 4tjS -f a sfTe—walk between Inez Street and 97th Avenue. 6. Action: XXy, Approval as requested Approval with conditions 5T- Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: ' K _ The applicant & owners x_ Owners of record within the required distance X_ The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization _xx Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON November 3, 1987, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. &peedl: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with •18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days ;after notice is given and sent. i The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 PM November 3, 1987 10. ouestions: if you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171. (0257P) CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION " FINAL ORDER NO. 87 - 12 PC A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WHICH APPROVES AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR BUTLER TERRACE SUBDIVISION (S 8-86/V 9-86/FINAL ORDER NO. 86-15 PC) REQUESTED BY SAMUEL GOTTER. The Tigard Planning Commission reviewed the above application at a public hearing on October 6, 1987. The Commission based its decision on the facts, findings and conclusions noted below: A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Subdivision S 8-86 & Variance V 9-86 REQUEST: To modify conditions 8 and 9 of Final Order 86-15 PC to allow the termination of the southern sidewalk on Inez Street on the Tigard School District property and the elimination of a sidewalk between Inez Street and 97th Avenue. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5 (Residential 4.5 units/acre) ( APPLICANT: Samuel A. Gotter III OWNER: Same 9541 SW Inez Street Tigard, OR 97224 LOCATION: Between the western end of Inez Street and 97th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 11AC, T.L. 2700) 2. Background A six lot subdivision was approved by the Planning Commission on May 29, 1986, subject to conditions including the following which are.the subject of this request. NO. An 8 foot wide bicycle/pedestrian path, and accompanying 20 foot wide public right-of-way or easement, shall be installed between the end of the cul-de-sac and 97th Avenue which meets City standards as determined by the Engineering Division. #9. A sidewalk shall be installed along the south side of Inez Street which Meets City standards. In lieu of this condition, an alternate method of terminating the existing southern sidewalk, which is acceptable to the Tigard School District, may be approved by the Planning Director. FINAL ORDER NO. 87 - 12 PC - PAGE 1 3. Vicinity Information The area on the east side of 97th Avenue is zoned R-4.5 and includes similar small ac^eage parcels to the north, single family residences on 8,000 to 12,000 square foot lots to the east and Twality Junior High School to the south. The land on the west side of 97th Avenue is zoned R-3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units/acre) and it consists of a combination of small acreage tracts and single family residences. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description The subdivision has - been developed and the sidewalks are among the last remaining items to be completed. The applicant proposes the deletion of the sidewalk in condition #8 above, deletion of the sidewalk on the southern side of the Inez Street cul—de—sac, and ending the ' southern sidewalk on Inez Street the school parking lot (see Exhibit "A"). 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Tigard School District submitted a letter recommending deletion of the sidewalk between 97th and Inez. The Community Development Department staff recommended retaining the sidewalk for the following reasons: 1. The grade of the sidewalk will be well within City standards. It will be no steeper than sections of 97th Avenue. 2. The proposed alternative link with the school parking lot presents a different hazard by encouraging children to walk and ride on the driveway and amongst maneuvering vehicles. Also, during the hearing for the subdivision. neighbors were concerned about vehicles crossing over the school property onto Inez Street. This will increase the potential for this problem. 3. Pedestrian/bicyclist access between Inez and 97th should not have to rely upon school property to make the connection. 4. Eventually, a sidewalk and bike lane will be located on the east side of 97th Avenue. Several individuals testified in favor of deleting the sidewalk. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Policy 8.1.4 calls -for safe 'and convenient bicycle and pedestrian access throughout the City. Based upon testimony from the neighborhood, the sidewalk connection does not appear to be advisable. i FINAL ORDER NO. 87 — 12 PC — PAGE 2 C. DECISION Based upon the findings and conclusions above, the Planning Commission approves the amendment to Conditions 8 and 9 of Final Order 86-15 PC subject to the following conditions: 1. The sidewalk shall not be installed along the south side of the Inez Street cul—de—sac or between 97th Avenue and Inez Street (Exhibit "A"). 2. The southern sidewalk shall. terminate at the school parking lot. Tigard School District permission shall be obtained prior to construction. 3. All other conditions of Final Order 86-15 PC shall remain in effect. It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: This _ P3 day of October, 1987, by the Planning Commission of the City of Tigard. &��- ae-c-'X,1 Donnie 'Owens, Vice President Tigard Planning Commission C is/1465D FINAL ORDER NO. 87 — 12 PC — PAGE 3 era W � � � p p �q C".) o f" v •Il�ios� �w � � � . Los « W) cr•rtl� i— I • cc v N � In nn& f � ' I ti 2C'ril w N n « W ^ w 1i'i01 X •r • I to 1 « n N c o do 4 clip M W to w rn e D ♦ r•-�1 N go 1 (ffi01 ,,�Q,freQll) � i I V � • 0 Q Q ` M a M V r�oo.w• a u+ � 04- M. 4AA IieCY11YE /� �b r t Oct 21,921 0 � I E 3. 1 o O J lt a « « « • • e y f N• • h K • n i p in a { w •- Y ! Z � ! deo wa • � 4 1 u�z I C.i M