Loading...
City Council Packet - 05/11/1987 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS & STUDY AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, MAY 11, 1987, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. o STUDY SESSION - 6:50 PM 2. REGULAR MEETING: 2.1 Call To Order and Roll Call -- all p:`:e::t except Eadon 2.2 Pledge of Allegiance 2.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items Staff recommended table 6.2 to 5/18/87 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please) Phil Pasteris & Frances Tousey re: Pinebrook Street Light Needs 7. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff - None 6. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 6.1 Receive and File: a Block Grant Needs Statement - South Metzger Area b Council Meeting Calendar Update 6.2 Approve Sign Code Workplan Jo/Ed to approve with 6.2 being tabled to 5/18 - UA 4. 1357H/MURRAY ROAD LID DISCUSSION Consensus of Council was to hear original proposal on 6/8. Directed staff to mail c aLiva :a cul rz par y =-=rn ,!^a s:ng mien 1 and Option 3 altarTuat'ws. Should Option 3 be more desirable, a now resolution of be drawn up for a public hearing on July 13th. intent would 5. 911 REPORT - Tabled to 5/18 1. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 10:38 PM under the provisions of COS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property tr=w;actions, and current and pending litigation issues. 8. ADJOURNMENT - lw/4614A COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 11, 1987 - PAGE 1 t q,4e T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — MAY 11, 1987 — 6:50 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Tom Brian; Councilors: Jerry Edwards, Valerie Johnson (arrived 6:52 p.m.), and John Schwartz; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; David Lehr, Chief of Police (arrived 7:10 p.m.); Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Jill Monley, Community Services Director (arrived 10:05 p.m.); Ken Fox, Legal Counsel; Loreen Wilson, City Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. i 2. STUDY SESSION E a. Citye-A-dim—inistrator distributed revised consideration schedule for thelmeeting and walked through the agenda issues with Council. (Councilor Johnson arrived — 6:52 p.m. ) i b. Sign Code Workplan — After brief discussion, consensus of Council � was to discuss the Workplan at the May 18, 1987 Council meeting. Councilor Johnson advised the Chamber of Commerce would like to be involved in the Sign Code implementation. C. 135th Avenue LID — City Engineer distributed a memorandum from the City Attorney regarding assessments for the right—of—way = acquisition. City Engineer also advised Council there was a problem with the notice which was mailed with about 33 out of 200 not being mailed. He advised Council that staff hand delivered the notices to those 33 property owners on this date. Recessed: 7:04 p.m. Reconvened: 7:08 p.m. 3. CALL TO STAFF FOR NON—AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administrator recommended Council table Item 6.2 for further discussion at the May 18, 1987 Council meeting. 4. VISITOR'S AGENDA a. Phil Pasteris, NPO #6 Chairman, discussed the street lighting needs of the Pinebrook neighborhood. He noted an increase in crime in the area within the last few months. Mr. Pasteris suggested since Pinebrook was classified as a minor collector, it would be most appropriate to have street lights installed. City Administrator reported the Police Department has been giving heavier patrol to the area. (Chief of Police arrived 7:10 p.m. ) Page 1 — COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 11, 1987 I Councilor Johnson requested staff research the history of the f area to determine whether or not street lights were promised in the past to the neighborhood and this item be set for future discussion. Councilor Edwards suggested other areas could be similar within the City limits and expressed concerned with setting a precedent. Mayor Brian noted it is not the City's intent to install street lights throughout the South Metzger annexation as reported in the past. The .City is now looking to set up criteria and standards for a priority list for street lights. He directed staff to research any promises made to the Pinebrook area in the past and to report to Council. b. Frances B. Tousey, 14660 S.W. 89th Avenue, presented a petition of residents requesting street lights be installed in the Pinebrook neighborhood. City Administrator stated he would send a letter to all of the citizens who signed the petition advising them staff is researching the issue. He will report back to City Council regarding the particulars on the Pinebrook issue and also discuss a future date of the Street Lighting Policy for Council Review. 5. NON—AGENDA ITEMS — None were discussed. 6. CONSENT AGENDA 6.1 Receive and File a. Block Grant Needs Statement — South Metzger Area b. Council Meeting Calendar Update 6.2 Approve Sign Code Workplan Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to approve with Item 6.2 being tabled to May 18, 1987. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. t Recessed: 7:26 p.m. Reconvened: 7:31 p.m. 7. 135th/MURRAY ROAD LID DISCUSSION a. Mayor Brian noted the history of this issue, stating it was originally heard in March 1987. At that time, there was concern expressed by citizens that the suggested design for the road improvements was inappropriate for the area. He advised this meeting was for open discussion. Presentation of information from the City Engineer and a formal hearing would be held June 8. b. City Engineer apologized for approximately 33 late notices which ( were hand carried on this date, noting the computer mailing list inadvertently ommitted 33 names. Page 2 — COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 11, 1987 f City Engineer outlined the history of the issue and defined terminology which had may have been misunderstood in the past. i He also highlighted the differences for Council and citizens between minor collector, local and rural street standards. 1 City Engineer outlined assessment method alternatives for right—of—way purchases as highlighted in the attorney's f, memorandum dated April 3, 1987. i City Engineer noted there had been a suggestion that System Development Charge (SDC) monies be spent to offset the cost of a 'c portion of the LID improvements. He reported through April 3, 1987, the following monies had been received by the City from within the LID boundaries since the inception of the SDC fees. Street Systems SDC's $147,100 Storm Drainage SDC's 47,750 Parks SDC's 40,400 Total of All SDC's $235,250 City Engineer distributed a proposal for various alternatives and estimated costs for those improvements. He noted all costs were estimates and actual costs charged through the Bancrofting assessment method would be based on the actual cost occurring at the time of development. City Engineer highlighted each of the options noting the project cost estimates, the typical assessment for those alternatives, and the percentage of assessment as compared to the March 1987 proposal. (See attached proposed street LID cost spreadsheet — Exhibit A). C. Lengthy discussion followed between staff, Council and citizens. Some issues discussed in detail were the requirements for a bridge versus a conduit system in the 100 year floodplain area; the options of joining Murray and 135th in the LID versus improving 135th Avenue only at this time; and the type of improvements the City Engineer could support. City Engineer noted he could not favor Alternative No. 5 which would develop 135th Avenue to Interim Rural Roadway Designation. d. Public Comment o Dave Klingle, 12900 S.W. 132nd Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 97223, expressed concern regarding the connection of 135th Avenue with Murray. He noted the extension of Walnut over Bull Mountain Road needed to be resolved since as soon as the connection was made, traffic would impact the area. a f ( Page 3 — COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 11, 1987 i City Engineer reported the Murray to Walnut Street extension is defined in a written agreement. City staff is working with Washington County now to address the diversion of some of that traffic over to Bull Mountain Road. o Russ Krueger, 1335 S.W. 66th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97225, stated he was opposed to including Murray Boulevard in the LID. He said with the development of his large parcel on the proposed Murray Extension, he could contract that work at a lesser rate than what the City could develop the property for. o Mike Kruse, 12220 S.W. Morning Hill, Tigard, Oregon 97223, stated he was in favor of the development. He understood that no matter which option was selected, it would cost an average of about $1,000 per homeowner. He noted he could not support Options No. 4 or 5, but could support Options No. 1, 2b or 3a. o Joan Johansson, 13535 S.W. Walnut Street, stated she was not { in the LID at this time, but addressed concerns regarding the widening which would need to be accomplished along 135th Avenue with the existing close setbacks. Since she resides at the corner of Walnut and 135th Avenue, she did question the intersection treatment at that location. o Roger Anderson, 10120 S.W. Kable Street, Tigard, Oregon, stated he was not in the LID area, but had been involved with the project off and on, even when it was being considered by Washington County. He noted he favored Options No. 4 or 5. o Charles Halverson, 10525 S.W. Clydesdale Place, Tigard, Oregon 97223, suggested an Option No. 6 be added which would delay the project. He felt until Beaverton built Murray Road, the cost of this improvement would not be needed. He also addressed concerns regarding the intersections of Walnut at 121st and Walnut at Tiedeman and Fonner which are presently unable to handle the existing traffic. He noted the additional heavy impact from the Murray Extension would make Walnut Street extremely hazardous. o Dan Dugan, 11035 S.W. 135th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 97223, stated he was concerned for property owners in the area who owned small acreage parcels which were too small to sell to 1 developers, yet, so large that the assessment on the property was prohibitive. He noted he owned 1.36 acres and his assessment, under the original Alternative No. 1 proposal, was $18,000. He requested some relief for the smaller acreage parcels in the area. i e. Mayor Brian requested discussion from Council regarding options they would consider. C Page 4 — COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 11, 1987 o Councilor Johnson requested both sidewalks, street lights, and undergrounding of utilities be deleted. She expressed interest in acquiring 60 feet of right-of-way, even with Option 4 or 5, noting that she leaned towards Option 4 with a 60-foot right-of-way and the City paying for the bridge improvements. o Councilor Schwartz requested only one sidewalk be deleted. He supported street lights and favored Option 1 with Murray Road due to the cost effectiveness of doing both projects at the same time. He suggested the City look at a culvert system rather than bridge in the 100-year floodplain area. He requested deleting undergrounding of utilities and suggested SDC charges be used to offset the City's participation in the cost of the bridge or culvert. o Councilor Edwards noted support of Options No. 2, 3 or 4. He stated he could not support Option No. 5. He advised 60 feet of right-of-way did not seem necessary; 50 feet is sufficient. He noted street lights would need to be installed for him to support any project. Undergrounding of utilities was not an issue to him. He felt a bike path was necessary, but perhaps not a sidewalk. However, he did note preference for at least one sidewalk to remain in the project. Regarding the bridge versus culvert issue, Councilor Edwards said whichever could be done for the least amount of money would be the option he could support. o Mayor Brian suggested the following would meet with Council concerns which had been expressed: Option 4a with one sidewalk, street lights, undergrounding of utilities plus 2g. He advised that alternative would be basically 4a minus 2d (deletion of one sidewalk) and 2g (addition of Cotswald No. 3). He noted at final engineering, Council would need to look at the bridge versus culvert option and go with the less cost { still leaving the road free from flooding. Lengthy discussion followed. f. Council consensus was to consider Option No. 3, with 60 feet of right-of-way, one sidewalk, undergrounding of utilities and a portion of Cotswald No. 3 Subdivision being included in the assessment area, noting the three lots south of Morning Hill Drive as the most southerly point of the inclusion area of Cotswald No. 3. Street light inclusion in the LID was recommended by a 3-1 vote of the Council; Councilor Johnson voting nay. r 't Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 11, 1987 (Jill Monley arrived: 10:05 p.m.) t, g. Council consensus was to hear Alternative 1 at the June 8 public hearing which was already scheduled and recommended a mailing be delivered to the LID area, noting Option 3 as outlined by Council and Option 1 with the total project cost and the typical estimated assessment. City Administrator suggested if Alternative 1 was not approved at the June 8 meeting Council could adopt a resolution of intent to consider Option 3 which would tentatively be scheduled for July 13. h. Councilor Edwards stated he could not support the inclusion of Murray Road after the overwhelming support of excluding that from the LID area at the March 1987 Council hearing. i. Mayor Brian noted assessment methods and right—of—way treatment could be addressed at a future meeting by Council. j . City Engineer stated he would report back to City Council at the May 18, 1987 Council meeting regarding the cost comparisons of Option 1 and Option 3. Recessed: 10:38 p.m. Reconvened: 10:40 p.m. 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.600 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions and current and pending litigation issues. 7. ADJOURNMENT: 11:25 p.m. /Cieycorder — City of Tigard ATTEST: Mayor — City of Tigard t E LW/cw:4660A F 1 C. Page 6 — COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 11, 1987 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice 7-6045 a BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising • City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice PO Box 23397 • Tigard, OR 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON. ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. (. Anne Tann being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the dr' 1993. eg0 a newspaper of general circulation as define in O 5 193.010 and 193.020; published a in the aforesaid county and state; that City CoLnci a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for successive and consecutive in the following issues: May 7 1987 I Subscribed andso before me this ay 7. 1987 r 046tary Public for Oregon My Cmmmisaion Exoes. 9-20-88 AFFIDAVIT The fonowift sehWed'a0nda'iteM.are 0UbVAAed-ftCiyaur Information: 0 Fnrlher mfg siid fAtii e . be bbfetned 4mm the City,ltecor- deT 13125 S.W'`VaU R1vd4,Tlgas'd,Oregon 87;23,or by'calling IML4171. CrTY 132UNC[i. MEETING MAY 11,19#7 ` . S 30P M.11l iy_720 PX Rt*gWar Meeting _ TLGAitD CIV)[C CHER,TOWN.RAIZ_` S:WsgAIZ A>+),I),r3D,OREGON `: i -i= fife.: apt of ORS 192 AB0(1) (d).- �/as�a�Aoad ' - > Dlad�nd _ s r t i �TR"�' ;fd...t^o """':"- ..5 3`ii�r -t• FiG4' 'IY CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING t In the Matter of the Proposed City Council Meeting Time Change on May 11, 1987 STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss City of Tigard ) I, Catherine Wheatley, being first duly swon, on oath, depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places a copy of Notice of Meeting Time Change for the Council Meeting date May 11, 1987, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereon of the 8th day of May 1987. 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. �CC &/ZLC. Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder Subscribed and sworn to before me this 8th day of May, 1987. s c r'ITil h�.'. ?� Notary Public for Oregon 3 '' My Commission Expires: ��-OG �$Q ,� 1�` 1 May 8, 1987 NOTICE OF MEETING TIME CHANGE Notice is hereby given that the Agenda for May 11, 1987 has been rearranged as to order as called for by the Mayor with the common consent of Council. There will be a Study Session beginning at 6:30 p.m. with the regular meeting commencing at 7:00 p.m. . The 135th/Murray Road LID Discussion will be held at 7:30 p.m. as was originally noticed to interested parties. The Executive Session which was to have been convened at the beginning of the meeting will be placed as the last item before adjournment. The Executive Session will be held under the provisins of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. Thomas M. Brian, Mayor 4651A AGENDA ITEM # — VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE S // (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED MERT S = / S 1_L FF KI I DATE T i I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: I 2-g—r), ZM Ld=l-V--QU A Tnoj Lz17 �iSct�SSiov, Name, Address and Affiliation. Name, Address and Affiliation 3 �'h Ave Poffflard Q1 5 'Zon Al QAall3Ss S cv ttJ / otiQ At a,�. 1✓ � 3 S r� _j6 a c�� �� �� ' u n May 11, 1987 PROPOSED STREET L.I.D. S.W. 135th AVENUE Project Cost Typical AssesslAssess As % of Alternative [Estimated] [Estimated] March Est. 1. Joint Murray/135th LID 1,862,000 890 100 [Collector Stds; R/W donated; City pays for bridge] I 2. LID for 135th only [Collector stds. ; R/W donated] — (a) All costs tc LID 1,409,000 1,269 143 — (b) City pays for bridge 1,223,000 1,101 124 — (c) Culverts instead of bridge (flooding allowed) 1.233,000 1,110 125 — (d) If sidewalk deleted on [deduct [deduct [deduct] one side of street 50,0001 453 — (e) If all street lighting & [deduct [deduct [deduct undergrounding are deleted 226,0001 204] 233 — (f) If R/W is purchased [add 249,0001 [add 224] [add 25] — (g) If Cotswald #3 is assessed [No Change] [deduct 663 [deduct 7] 3. LID for 135th with alternate boundary (Collector Std. ; R/W donated). (a) If City pays for bridge 968,000 11019 114 (b) If R/W is purchased [add 161,0001 [add 169] [add 19] 4. LID with alternate boundary & 36' street width (R/W donated) — (a) If City pays for bridge 930,000 979 110 — (b) If R/W is purchased [add 70,0003 [add 74] [add 8] 5. 135th LID with interim rural roadway (R/W donated; no streetlighting) — (a) If City pays for bridge 501,000 451 51 — (b) If R/W is purchased [add 120,0003 [add 108] [add 12] 3194P i MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Bob Jean, City Administrator May 11, 1987 City Council FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, 'f + Community Development SUBJECT: Don Jenkins, 10675 SW Hall Blvd. A resident of the newly annexed South Metzger area, Don Jenkins, visited with the Planning Division Friday, May 8, 1987. He has an issue which he may bring to the Council tonight. He has operated an auto sales business from his home in an R-9 zone for the past three years. To continue operating under DMV regulations, he needs a sign-off by the City that the use is allowed. Tigard's zoning, and I believe the County's as well, does not allow this type of use without strict conditions and a home occupation permit. With no proof of a hoiae occupation permit issued by the County, I have instructed my staff that businesses such as this have no legal basis. Following are the facts related to Mr. Jenkin's concern: o His land is zoned R-9, we would make the zoning R-12. o He has no County permits. o His earlier DMV business license was signed by the County, by a representative of the Sheriff's office. We do not know whether land use concerns were raised at the time. c The business has operated for over three years. c He has 6 - 8 cars on his property, all are in his name, three are used by the family. My recommendation is that he apply for a home occupation permit under our code provisions. Any permit will not, however, allow him to store the vehicles at his property or have customers visit the site. Our code would allow him to base his business in his home only if he located the autos on a property in a commercial zone. It appears that such an arrangement would not serve his purposes. r_ (WAM/br3185P) l - _ - � iE ' ^�,1�--Frances---$.-4ay use ---- .• .®e�. Cc J VELD SLIcir^T Street hiphts MAY R tsar y r,re 4-24-87 � C!TY OF TIGARD i jar.._13i11_Aonahan.- - - --- ------ --- - -- -- -- Tigard, Oregon __ ---- -._-- - ----- i 7 Dear Sires _-.-__ {--JGfe,--the-under.signed.mesidenta—.nd-prapert3L-a�rnexs �hn i ;"s on i S.w.Pinebroolc_Street in the_City_of Tigard, request .that_-the.. highest priories t--given to. the installation._Of__street_� ghts n this__a�re&: It is the darkest streetin the city and therefore subject to much ivandalism and break-ins. A check with the Titzard Police dept.will. i verify this. -- --- .�/ fA ---.• -e_-_ t` ._-.'�tZ•v► u� ✓.yL.r_.�t u�,���� :�,,,,�TL���'L-;c/�r _ �1 s4:10 je- P-a�* -lccv r —1L-7 mow. NAME - SUBJECT. _ DATE - .� � Re - _ st Y7 -5e --- -- - - _ . .. _-_$fib S�S'w --- �►`'�°-�----�---� �7-•- -- . . sem. __��---- _ - ---------- - � - - ►-- ---� -- 1 qglz s las. 17 Vq sc�J i br ro �� - ---------- -�S -- - -P__ K e ;P,GtS - S 4g4-1 Hrruwc � C1,4 _-1/� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: May 11 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: April 30, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 135th Avenue PREVIOUS ACTION: yTn DiG isAinn PREPARED BY: _ Ran„all R. Wooley DEPT HEAD OKjA4ffCITY ADMIN OKI & L REQUESTED BY: OLICY ISSUE Discussion of alternatives for 135th Avenue LID. _ f INFORMATION SUMMARY In March the Council received public testimony on a proposed 135th/Murray Blvd. LID. The hearing was continued to June 8th and a workshop meeting was scheduled for May 11th. At the May 11th meeting, staff and the consultant will be prepared to present information on alternatives as directed by the Council. Due to the short time schedule, no written report has been prepared. We expect to make an oral presentation supplemented with wall displays and handouts as appropriate. Attached is a copy of the meeting notice which has been mailed to property owners. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Attached memo of April 20th describes the alternatives being reviewed. With this information, we should also be prepared to discuss various combinations of alternatives, if desired. l FISCAL IMPACT I { {i SUGGESTED ACTION This is a workshop discussion. Formal action is not required. However, if there is a consensus on a revised LID proposal, Council may wish to direct staff to prepare a new resolution of intent and to prepare to send new hearing notices. April 30, 1987 C'TY®F TIFARD OREGON 25 Years of Service 1961-1986 NOTICE OF WORKSHOP MEETING 135TH AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT MEETING TIME: 7:30 P.M., Monday, May 11, 1987 LOCATION: Tigard City Hall, 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard In March, the City Council held a public hearing to consider formation of a local improvement district (LID) for construction of improvements to SW 135th Avenue and a portion of the proposed Murray Boulevard extension. Following receipt of public testimony, the Council voted to continue the hearing until June to allow time for discussion of additional alternatives. The meeting on May 11th will be a workshop meeting of the Council. It is not a formal hearing. Instead, it will be an opportunity to discuss alternative LID options. It will be a public meeting. Owners of property within the proposed LID are encouraged to attend and participate in the workshop meeting. This notice is being mailed to the property owners who received notice of the March hearing. If you know of new property owners in your neighborhood, please share this information with them. Sincerely, Randall R. Wooley, P.E. City Engineer (RRW:br3153P) 13125 SW Hail Blvd.P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor & City Council April 20, 1987 FROM: Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer od SUBJECT: 135th LID As directed, I have polled the Council regarding the LID alternatives which we should investigate prior to the May lith workshop meeting. While there was not total agreement, there was consensus on several items. Based on the poll results, we will proceed as follows: 1. Consider only 135th Avenue (and not the Murray Boulevard connection). 2. Estimate the cost savings if we leave the road at its existing elevation and use culverts instead of a bridge, recognizing that the road would still flood occasionally. P 3. Estimate costs and right-of-way requirements for an interim rural-type road with ditches. 4. Estimate the costs of right-of-way acquisition if no property owners donate right-of-way. 5. Determine the impacts on the LID if the south 900 feet of 135th are constructed by subdividers, not as part of the LID. 6. Determine cost savings if we delete the sidewalk on one side. The consultant has agreed to perform the additional engineering on a time and materials basis not to exceed $5,000. RRW:sb/1250W r� O'DONNELL. RAMIS. ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1727 N.W.HOYT STREET /^, _ PORTLAND.OREGON 97209 E 15031 222-4402 DATE April 3, 1987 To Randy Wooley, Tigard City Engineer FROM Jeff Bachrach, City Attorney's Office 135th/MurrayRE LID - Assessments for Ri ht-of-Wa Acquisition Costs To put the City on safer legal ground, when and if it goes ahead d for assessing the cost of righ87 2f-way with this LID, the netro acquisitions outlined in paragraph 4 of Resolution No. alternative approaches should be modified. This memo outlines two for you to consider. - The first, and most straightforward, is to add the costs of any right-of-way acquisition to the total LID cost, and thusall roportional share. This app will property owners will pay p provide a windfall of sorts to those owners eyhwillrefuse havetcashdonate right-of-way and have to be bought out. their pocket and the cost to pay them off will be borne by everyone. Those who have already dedicated right-of-way will not in receive any direct cash or credit for their dedication. essenceiothey n exchangealready for theirreceived dedicationbenefit of being allowed to deve p i As a second approach, if the City does want to give those who have already dedicated right-of-way some additional benefit, I recommend some form of a credit rather than the exemption approach set up in Resolution No. 87-28. One credit system could work as follows: Establish a separate right-of-way acquisition assessment, exempting those properties without frontage from87the8 assessment, as called for in paragraph 4 of Resolution No. • Those who have dedicated right-of-way would not be exempted from the front footage assessment, but rather would rec�eepae credit for the present-day value of their- right-of-way. would value of their right-of-way, based on zoning and frontage, have to first be added to the front footage assessment cost before figuring in the credit. The net result of this approach is essentially the same as the current exemption approach. The City could also consider assessing those proportions without frontage for right-of-way acquisition. JB:mch 4/3/87 Page 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMSUMMARY F AGENDA OF: May 11, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: May 1, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: South Metzger PREVIOUS ACTION: CDB6 Needs Assessment CDB6 Needs Assessment acknowledged by Council Feb. 9, 1987 PREPARED BY: Duane Roberts, Adm. Plan._ DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE To submit statement of Community Development Block Grant needs identified in South Metzger. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City's Community Development Block Grant needs inventory for the 1988-90 funding cycle was submitted to the county Community Development Office in mid—February 1987. The inventory included facility needs identified by three nonprofit service organizations. As indicated in the attached memo from H. J. Manch of the Office of Community Development, two CDB6 need statements were submitted to the county by CPO 4 in Metzger. Both needs assessment questionnaires identify needs that occur within the portion of Metzger recently annexed to Tigard. The two identified needs include Ash Creek drainage improvements near 87th and Hall and sidewalk construction in the vicinity of Metzger School. Because of the change in jurisdiction, the county advises that these statements will need to be re—submitted through the City. By including the two statements as part of its needs inventory, the City is ` merely acknowledging that these needs have been identified within its area. At the later stage of proposal development, to occur during the period July — Nov. 1987, the City will have the opportunity to review and comment on proposals that address needs that are geographically located within its area. FISCAL IMPACT Grant funds for sidewalk improvements costing approximately $160,000 and stream improvements costing approximately $148,000 are requested. No City contributions would be required. SUGGESTED ACTION Acknowledge receiving the needs statements submitted by CPO 4 and include these in the City's needs inventory. { DR:cn/1365W i f WASHINGTON ;.} COUNTY, OREGON � LS APR 16 1987 WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTA110N DATE April 15, 1987 TO Hal Bergsma, DLUT FROM H.J. March, Program Manager Office of Community Developme t SUBJECT Change in sponsorhip of Identified Need due to Annexation of South Metzger Area to City of Tigard. t The Unincorporated area' s need statements concerning Ash Creek storm drainage improvements and walkways near Metzger Elementary School (OCD Reference no. 57 & 58) were submitted by CPO 4 in February 1987. With the recent annexation of South Metzger Area to the City of Tigard on March 31, 1987 , any proposals for Community Development Block Grant funds would have to be submitted by the City of Tigard, as they are now the appropriate jurisdiction to sponsor projects to address these needs. Needs statements No. 57 and 58 which are enclosed will need to be submitted to OCD from City of Tigard on the appropriate three page form as soon as possible. Please forward them to Duane Roberts, geographic t coordinator for the City of Tigard. Please note the listing of these two need statements in the appendix of the updated CD Plan Draft remain under the Unincorporated Area section, since they were identified prior to annexation. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please call Jean R. Harrison or Michael Matteucci at 648-8814. cc: Duane Roberts City of Tigard Encl. I I Office of Community Development 150 North First Avenue Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 Phone:503/648-8814 OCD - 11/25/86 IV. NEEDS ASSESS14ENT QUESTIONNAIRE (NOTE: USE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH IDENTIFIED NEED) . I . Identification of Respondent Name : Hal Bier sma Agency: Washin ton Co. DLUT Address : 150 N First Ave., Hillsboro, Or 97124 Phone : 648-8817 2• According to the definitions on the enclosed sheet, which general CDBG program category includes this need? Neighborhood Revitalization Q Community Facilities Housing Public Services 3. Indicate whether this need is located in the following Jurisdiction: City MUnincorporated Washington County Unspecified 4 . .Has this need statement been included in the need of the local Jurisdiction? s inventory ® Yes No Please specify 5• Has this need statement been coordinated with a coordinating nat ing YesNo If no, please explain: 6• Date approved by your Board or Council ® Rp ri ee_.�a �V ni rartl,r TT rrm 7. Describe the community development need. Please be specific. Sidewalks along streets in the vicinity of Metzger Elementry School 8. Does the need you have identified occur within a definable area of a city or unincorporated are of the county? If so, please indicate and describe the location. For neighborhood revitalization needs , please enclose a map of the area and identify the location of any specific needs such as deteriorated streets . Please see attached map 9. For the specific need you have identified, what is the estimated number of people in need of CDBG funded activities? Please identify your data source specifically. Number Data Source Estimated total number in need? 1245 1985-88 CD Plan Low or moderate income? 635 1985-88 CD Plan Elderly (over age 62) ? Physically or mentally handicapped? Member of a minority group? Other quantitative measure if applicable? (e.g. , # of structures in need of rehabilitation) 2. 10. Why is this need important to the affected people? streets leading to the school are not developed to standard ( no curbs, gutter, sidewalks, inadequate width) and generally are inadequate for pedestrians. This is especially unsafe for school children, given increasing traffic levels in the neighborhood. 11. What type of project do you envision to address identified need? Asphalt pathways along Oak and Locust Streets between Hall and Greenburg and 90th Ave between Oak and Hall. 12. What is the estimated cost to address the need which you have identified? $160,000 13. Are you aware of any other public or private funds or programs that are available to meet this identified need? If so, which? 14. Any other comments . Please return by February 15, 1987 to: Office of Community Development C 1049 S.W. Baseline Rd. , Bldg. C Hillsboro, OR 97123 3. 1 T I MOM • �� '�. �� .�;L �I '�LIi�! ■.IIS �11a1�—■■■��I 1�� .■ i -�: ��_�� ,I��.. SII■i■�.Bill f � ' �•� —� INN ■■1111'■l1" ■■�mom mai. ■ ■:■J!;:11111 z' �■ MNu ■111■=111111 • ` MOM. �■■■��.. 11112oil■■ ■■1■Fr ■ 1111- - � ��� 1■1�� ��_ - ,; i�llll■i :IIII:r�■11,�f 1111 ��I■ ■1i11�._ �IIII1i -I■'0r' 1111/ 0LIL�'-.-� X111111 ■■111:/7■11�1i1�� ■aN/� ��� - ■ ,1■1■■� 11:1■■■■001111 ■Lm ■■t i■i�� ■ II■i1/11 . :1:1■ MIEN s■i�/,+� 111111 .11 L� III■ M - ■ ����•_�- = ■Ella ■IJI■ 1111 ■L ��i: :. �:�� �� l�ii■ i1111G: 11111`7 �■1■i 11■G ���'����'�► ■11' '1111— 11 " 11111' x11111 -■1 ��: i��■ _ RIO ■ ■it "•':' �����:�;������c, 11�;,i ■1. .11 ," ��' Sam .. . 1■ SII 1 FMA ■ 2.10100 111111 111 111 : Elm .� ■IC ■1111 ■'1■ 1: :1/,�J": �1� ■— ■Illj: NINE _ �.!i � ?��■/L1�11111■� ., � � ■i �■■u■i ��-•• -is 2 ONE •• ■ NINE �_�_■ ■� ..r OCD - 11/25/86 IV. NEEDS ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE (NOTE: USE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH IDENTIFIED NEED) . 1. Identification of Respondent Name: Duane Roberts Agency: City of Tigard Address: PO Box 23397 Phone : Tigard, Or 97223 2. According to the definitions on the enclosed sheet, which general CDBG program category includes this need? Neighborhood Revitalization Community Facilities Housing Q Public Services 3 . Indicate whether this need is located in the following jurisdiction: City (— Unincorporated Washington County Unspecified 4 . •Has this need statement been included in the needs inventory of the local jurisdiction? cio Yes LJ No Please specify 5. Has this need statement been coordinated with a—cotordinating organization? ® Yes. No If no, please explain: L.�J 6. Date approved by your Board or Council 7. Describe the community development need. Please be specific. Replace undersized culvert located near Hall Blvd. and 87th Ave and perform minor channel upgrading to improve capacity and hydrolics 8. Does the need you have identified occur within a definable area of a city or unincorporated are of the county? If so, please indicate and describe the location. For neighborhood revitalization needs , please enclose a map of the area and identify the location of any specific needs such as deteriorated streets . Need occurs within prequalified area 35 as identified in 1984 County Community Development Plan. Site location is Ash Creek Bridge on Hall Blvd. near 87th. Please see accompanying map. 9. For the specific need you have identified, what is the estimated number of people in need of CDBG funded activities? Please identify your data source specifically. Number Data Source -- Estimated total number in need? 1245 WCCDP 1985-88 - Low or moderate income? 635 " - Elderly (over age 62)? - Physically or mentally handicapped? _ - Member of a minority group? - Other quantitative measure if applicable? (e.g. , # of structures in need of Crehabilitation) 2. 10. Why is this need important to the affected people? _rIIri-iirP—;qt Hall obstructs stream flow and causes ponding upstream and e*^ci^^ -�oSy Gfirpam, Flooding occurs primarily on private property, ro.cmi t i nn in- p- r,cr 7 ,fig c a.-�d ..rSonal hazard. 11. What type of project do you envision to address identified need? -_�ppplacement of undersized culvert and minor channel upgrading a�nr.,,r;ma*clv 50 ft. upstream and downstream 12. What is the estimated cost to address the need which you have identified? $147,9M per 4h Creek Drainage Master Plan, 1/86 13. Are you aware of any other public or private funds or programs that are available to meet this identified need? If so, which? No f+,ndina sources to in lenient Ash Creek plan have been identified to date_ No financinq plan is under active consideration at present 1 improvement of culvert at Hall is not included in St. Highway Dept. .-zi x-nvear plan. 14. Any other comments . app attachment i Please return by February 15, 1987 to: F Office of Community Development 1049 S.W. Baseline Rd. , Bldg. C C Hillsboro, OR 97123 3. a 14. As alluded to above, this statement identifies a single portion of a system wide drainage problOn. According to the Ash Creek Drainage Master Plan, the replacement of the Hall Blvd. culvert is one of eleven culvert and bridge improvement and eight related projects that are needed for storm drainage management. In view of this, it is important to mention that treating this improvement as a separate project is consistent with the implementation schedule set forth in the master plan. More specifically, replacement of the Hall culvert is the second of the nineteen capital projects included in the plan's proposed schedule. The first project was completed by the county this year. Thus, the proposed improvement follows an over-all plan, and it j is clear that improving the hydrolics at this site would not create the possibility of making problems worse in other areas. r ! MH ---JX 179.8 r` T --r• i I BR./ !r MH y f fit_- X \69.551 M.N M H / ! t C'- l _ 1f73 I I I I. . "., BR BR, \� rn o0 MH. 4 / © ta9�1 MH. 0 656,00 t X /{ o i 1 ( r ; f X175. 9 s.w. PINE " S T Al.H. 0 /,� ` ` , 7z .'yam •...•r- i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t k MEMORANDUM 4 t TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council May 1, 1987 i FROM: Marcha K. Hunt IM SUBJECT: COUNCIL MEETING CALENDAR UPDATE Where Date Meetin May 2 Sat Tigard Clean—Up Day THCR & THR May 4 Mon 6:30 Study Session/7:00 Business Meeting THCR td May 5 Tues 7:00 Budget Committee THCR & TNR May it Mon 6:30 Exec. Session/7:30 Study Agenda Meeting PDCR May 12 Tues 7:00 Budget Committee THR May 12 Tues 7:30 AAUW Piano Dedication Salem, Rm. 357 May 13 Wed 12:00 Noon Mayor's Wa Co. Caucus Town Hall May 14 Thurs 7:00 Boardsmanship Training Workshop THCR & THR May 18 Mon 6:30 Study Session/8:00 Business Meeting THR May 21 Thurs NPO Training Workshop May 25 Mon NO CITY COUNCIL MEETING---MEMORIAL DAY 14OLIDAY June 1 Mon NO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Embassy Suites June 5 Fri 7:00 First Niter THCR/THR June 8 Mon. 6:30 Study Session/7:00 Business Meeting Salem, Rm. 357 June 10 Wed 12:00 Noon Mayor's Wa. Co. Caucus THCR & THR June 15 Mon 6:30 Study Session/8:00 Study Agenda Meeting THCR & THR June 22 Mon 6:30 Study Session/7:00 Business Meeting June 26 Fri — Silver Falls 28 Sun Council Training Workshop June 29 Mon NO CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 4 Sat FIREWORKS July 6 Mon 4th OF JULY HOLIDAY—NO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Salem, Rm. 357 July 8 Wed 12:00 Noon Mayor's Wa. Co. Caucus July 9 Thurs— Timothy Lake Conference 10 Fri THCR/THR July 13 Mon 6:30 Study Session/7:00 Business Meeting THCR/THR July 20 Mon 6:30 Study Session/7:00 Business Meeting July 23 Thurs— Embarcadaro 26 Sun Oregon Mayor's Association Meeting July 25 Sat Cruisin' Tigard July 31 Fri Movers and Shakers Golf Aug 10 Mon 6:30 Study Session/7:00 Business Meeting THCR/THR, Rm. 357 Aug. 12 Wed 12:00 Noon Mayor's Wa. Co. Caucus SalemSalemHR Aug 17 Mon 6:30 Study Session/7:30 Study Agenda Meeting THCR/THR Aug 24 Mon 6:30 Study Session/7:00 Business Meeting l mh/1300p E