Loading...
City Council Packet - 09/22/1986 F J i. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, SEPTEMBER 22, 1986, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start ` TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. o STUDY SESSION 1. REGULAR MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call All present. 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 14,1 School Fee Waiver (Approved) 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 14.2 CIP Liisstt Adjustment ( proved14.3 I-5 Symposium (Information) 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Per Issue Please) 3. POLICE OFFICER OATHS OF OFFICE o Mayor Cook Administered oaths: Jeannie Gerd, Michaasl P. Hintz, Lawrance P. Raglione. David R. Warren 4. PRESENTATION OF KEYS To THE CITY o Mayor Cook - presented keys: Lavelle Allen, Marcia Geiser 5. PUBLIC HEARING - RIGHT-OF--WAY ANNEXATIONS - VARIOUS ROADS 5.1 Fonner Street = ' 5.2 Scholls Ferry Road 5.3 Walnut Street 5.4 121st Avenue _ T o Public Hearing Opened a Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Community Development Staff o Council Questions Or Comments r o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council Resolution 86- - Fonner Street Or/Ed1• is 11/17 to allow for ne�g-Fiborhood information meetings. UR Jo/Ed Resolution 86-109 - Scholls Ferry Road WEa Aye; May: Resolution 86- - Walnut Street - Br/Ed table to 11/17 to allow for neighborhood information seating*. UA Resolution 86- - 121st Avenue - Yr/6d table 11/17 to allow for neighborhood information meetings. UA 4 S Y Y ,+ A..t 6, COUNCIL REVIEW HEARING - CU 3-86 - TRI-MET TRANSIT CENTER - NPO #1 A request by the Tigard City Council to review the Hearings Officer approval with conditions of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of an off-street transit center in the CBD (Central Business District). (WCTM 2S1 2AA, Lots 4800 & 4901). This will be an "argument type" hearing only. The Council will consider is on only ileshall�notefore the cons der Hearings new officer, which horh evidenceile at whichCisy Hall.not in the Caunc record. o Review Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By-Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents. Cross Examina::ion o Recommendation By Community Development Staff o Council Questions Or Comments o Review Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council - Res. 8b-110 Ed/Jo to approve 7, FRONTIER MARKET/RANDALL LAND SWAP DISCUSSION DEL M, FRO NMA o Community Development Director 8, MUNICIPAL CODE REVISION - GENESIS LOOP PARKING - ORDINANCE NO. 86-4564 o Community Development Director 9, STREETS SDC REBATE REQUEST -- Tigard Christian Church - $4,500 o Community Development Director Jo/Ed UA 10. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ROLE DISCUSSION TABLE-TO FUTU E ME� o Community Development Director 11. JACK PARK REPORT o Community Development Director 12,A PARKS PLAN/RECREATION ROLE WORKPLAN PROPOSAL o Community Development Director Ea/Br hire consultant 12,8 STAFFING PLAN AUTHORIZATION - Consensus of Council - hold 2 meetings o City Administrator Weds. 9/24 5:30 PM Mon. 9/29 6:30 PM 13. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 13.1 Approve Council Minutes - August 18, September 3 & 10, 1986 13.2 Receive and File: Ed/Or UA a Community Development Land Use Decisions b Departmental Monthly Reports 13.3 Approve Agreement With State of Oregon Re: Hall/Burnham Improvements - Authorize Mayor and Recorder To Sign Res. 86 13.4 Approve Training Request - City Engineer -- $225.00 It is to Engineering Tech - $299.88 Engineering Tech --_1199.88 13.5 Approve Tidel Cable Franchise Transfer Deadline Extension - Resolution No. 86-ita 13.6 Approve Chief of Police Employment Agreement Addendum - Table to future meeting 14. NON-AGENDA ITEMS From Council and Staff 15. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executives to Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a), (d) (h) 7' discuss employment of City Officer, labor relations and current/pending litigation issues. Cancelled 16. ADJOURNMENT 10:18 PM lw/4110A T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - September 22, 1986, 1986 - 6:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Tom Brian (arrived at 7:15 p.m.), Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Edwards, and Valerie Johnson; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; David Lehr, Chief of Police; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Acting City Recorder. 2, CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administratqr requested the following items be considered under Non-Agenda Items: .1 Waiver of Building Permit Fees Request - Tigard High School 2 Addition to Capital Improvements Project List - Storm Drainage Summer Lake. .3 Announcement - Upcoming I-5 Symposium b. Motion by by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to amend the agenda as requested. Approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 2. VISrM'S AGENDA a. Hal Lyster, 15625 S. W. Alderbrook Circle, Tigard, Oregon, addressed the Council to register his protest against the proposed staff increases (13-1/4 FTEs) and resultant budget increase ($397,500) as requested by the City Administrator. The increase is to be funded by surplus from leftover budget and other fees. Mr. Lyster cited the fallowing reasons upon which he is basing his protest: 1. No mention was made of increased revenue generated by fees or franchise taxes or a budget surplus in Town Hall meetings during April and May of this year when the City Administrator and certain Council members urged the voters to increase the real property tax base. 2. Mr. Lyster listed several of the increases in the Budget and revenues comparing past years with the 86/87 Budget. 3. Charged that there were misrepresentations in the Newsletter to citizens concerning the gas tax, statements made about the budget and the City Audit. ���-, .t.`K v � ,: . 4 _. h+c'� "8,cn��:t.x •�a's1m.� r.:�ter, ..1 u- r�aK 4, Mr. Lyster maintained that the increased population of {- Tigard is not a valid criteria for the need to increase the bureaucracy as the City does not have the water, sewer, or fire systems to support. b, Mayor Cook advised Mr. Lyster that this item shall be considered on the Agenda later in the meeting, time permitting. If not, the item will be discussed at the next meeting. The Mayor added that no decision has been made on the proposed staffing increases and that the request is still only a proposal. C. City Administrator stated, for the record, that he is in disagreement with a lot of what Mr. Lyster said. The City Administrator would be glad to discuss the subject more with Mr. Lyster. 3. OATHS OF OFFICE a. Chief of Police Lehr reported that the City of Tigard had recently completed the hiring process for four new police officers. The Mayor administered the Oath of Office to Jeannie Gard, Michaal Hintz, Lawrence Raglione, and David R. Warren. b, Mayor Cook welcomed the four new employees to the Police Department of the City of Tigard. A special welcome was extended to the first female officer for the City, 4. PRESENTATION OF KEYS TO THE CITY a. Recognition for individuals who have served on committees and their terms have expired. The presentation of a "Key to the City" was made by Mayor Cook to Lavelle Allen who served on the Utilities and Franchise Committee from November 1985 to August 1986 and Marcia Gaiser who served on the Utilities and Franchise Committee from November 1985 to August 1986. 5. PUBLIC HEARING _ RIG T-OF-4jAy ANNEXATIONS IONS - VARIOUS ROADS. Should the City Council forward an annexation request to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary to annex: o the S. W. Fanner Street right-of-way between SW Walnut Street and S. W. 121st Avenue? o the south side of the Scholls Ferry Road right-of-way between S. W. 130th and S. W. 135th? -of--way between S. W. Fonner Street o the Walnut Street right and S. W. 135th? o the portions of the S. W. 121st right-of-way from Rose Vista Drive to Walnut Street which are not within the City limits? it. Public Nearing Opened page ,2 - COUNCIL MINUTES —SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 . . -: , b. Senior Planner stated that these four requests are to annex rights-of-quay into the City of Tigard. The Hearing is to -' discuss whether or not the City Council would like to submit these proposals to the Boundary Commission. The Boundary Commission would then hold a Public Hearing and make the actual decision as to whether or not the annexations should occur. The annexations are for rights-of--way only; no private property is included in the proposals. The streets are very important to the City in terms of the overall transportation system and are identified as either major or minor collector streets. Since these streets are within the City's Urban Planning Area, the County does not feel that they will be able to maintain them to adequate levels in the future. Jurisdiction will not automatically belong to the City; that's a separate process that has to occur between the City and the County once the streets are annexed. The City, however, cannot request jurisdiction of the streets until they are in the City limits. C. Public Testimony 1. S. W. Fonner Street a. Paul Adams, 11865 S. W. Fonner, testifiers that this is a fact finding meeting for him to clarify what this action would entail as far as taxes. Mayor Cook advised that this is just for the right-of-way and would not affect personal taxes at all. b. Richard Bruno, 11815 S. W. Fonner, noted increased traffic pattern changes and accelerated deterioration of the road. It is a dangerous street for bike riding or jogging. Mr. Bruno would like to see the City annex the road and would hope that bike paths and sidewalks would follow. c. Ken Worrall, 10680 S. W. Fonner, said that past maintenance has not been satisfactory. Annexation would be "one of the best ideas we've had so far." d. Eleanor Quimby, 11480 S. W. Fanner, noted that there have been many changes on Fonner. Mrs. Quimby is opposing the annexation. At the last election, voters had approved the Washington County Gas Tax which was to fund maintenance of minor and major collector roads. Maintenance of the road is not satisfactory. She is concerned that this is the first step towards forced annexation and resents this. The residents of the area will ask to be annexed into the City only when the City of Tigard can demonstrate and maintain credibility and ^ have something to offer the residents. Does not wish to T lose any property to bike paths and sidewalks. Page 3 - COUSNCIL:MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 f- F�i�X e. Lou Ane Mortensen, 11160 S. W. Fonner; is a member of NPO No. 3. Thanked Council for the notification of L individual landowners of S. W. Fonner, S. W. Walnut and S. W. 1213t concerning the annexation proposals. Asked that Council table the request as the NPO No. 3 has not been notified of the call of the meeting. The people of # the area all need a chance to get together to discuss their options and the possibility of future impacts. She requested that a knowledgeable staff person be present at a meeting to answer specific questions concerning the possible ramifications of such an annexation. f. Mariory Emme, 11221 S. W. Fonner Street, is in opposition to the annexation. Concerned about e:derly residents living on the street with fixed incomes and already paying taxes for the roads. Any additional tax would be a burden. g. Mayor Cook reiterated that only the roadway (no private property) is being considered for annexation. h. Bob Kircher, 12970 S. W. 121st (corner of Fonner and 121st). Supports comments by Ms. Mortensen to allow the evaluation as to what is needed for the area's roads by NPO No. 3. This comes as a surprise recommendation. Many property owners would prefer to have the County continue to maintain the road. The proposed annexation would create an island and the property owners in that island have the Constitutional right to choose who shall govern them. Mie would like to see a statement attached to any proposal proclaiming that there would be no Al forced annexation of the island properties without the approval and acceptance of the property owners. (Also %4 signed for the 121st Street and would like to have his R comments be considered as part of testimony for this Public Hearing). 2. Scholls Ferry It a. No one appeared to speak. 3. S. W. Walnut Street 4 a. E. P. Rogers, 11695 S. W. Walnut Street, is opposed to annexation of the front 25 feet of his deeded property. The divided jurisdiction; that is, the front 25 feet of his property being in the City while the rest of the ' property remaining in the County, would be quite 4-2 Page 4 COUNCIL-'MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 unsatisfactory. This street has recently been rebuilt by the County (up to 121st). Walnut Street is one of the major collector roads which should be the responsibility of the County. Requests that Council table any action until the NPO can discuss the proposed annexations. b. Harry Urling, 11625 S. W. Walnut Street, opposes the annexation. Questions whether the City of Tigard will be able to maintain the streets in a proper manner as they are taking on a lot of responsibility with all of the streets being annexed. c. Sue Capone, 11710 S. W. Walnut Street, feels that Walnut Street should remain as a County Road. d. Neal Sorensen, 11865 S. W. Walnut Street, recalled a previous City annexation attempt of the Walnut Corridor to even out the erratic borders to reduce costs and minimize confusion. The borders are those that the City created themselves in their annexing process. The City is now wanting to create more confusion by creating a checkerboard effect in doing the annexation of just the streets. If he was a resident of the City, he would be up in arms about the City paying for street maintenance in areas that belong to the County. 3. 121st Avenue a. Bob Kircher (see testimony above — S. W. Fonner Street). b. Sandra Smith, 12880, S. W. 121st Avenue. Requested written statement be read and made part of the Public Hearing testimony. The City Recorder read the testimony which contended the true reason for the request of annexation was not stated. She maintained that the City would widen the right-of-way. if annexed. This would be an advantage to the business interests for Tigard; however, this would be a disadvantage to the residents because of danger to automobile drivers and the children in the area. Requested that the Council not act on the request until they are "confident that you are knowledgeable of ALL the motives and consequences." 4. The City Recorder noted the items of testimony which had been received in writing: a. Fonner Street Right-of-Way Annexation 1. Kenneth 6 Cecilia Sibelian, favor annexation. 2. Jon & Judy Fessler, oppose annexation. "X Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 vy 3. Bob Bledsoe, Chairman of NPO No. 3, opposed to 121st Avenue, Walnut Street and Fonner Street annexations. Notes that residents were not notified of the proposals and would like to have the information forwarded to the NPO so there can be further study. b. 121st Avenue 1. Mrs. Laura E. Busby, opposes the annexation. 2. Althea Rodde, opposes the annexation. 3. Earl Busby opposes the annexation. 4. Georgia Reed opposes the annexation. 5. John Reed opposes the annexation. 6. Robert Root opposes the annexation. d. Community Development Director commented that this type of annexation is not considered by the staff to be a land use action that is normally sent to the NPO's. His recommendation is to approve these rights-of-way annexations and forward them to the Boundary Commission. e. Councilor Johnson said her address is on S. W. Walnut Street in an area that is already in the City of Tigard. She does not believe this will affect her decision. f. Councilor Brian commented that County has indicated that they will not, ever again, have the funds to repair potholes an Fonner Street as they recently did. It would be his intent, if the Fonner Street right-of-way is annexed, that the island created would also be annexed. If people are having that street overlayed and maintained, along police service and some of the other benefits, then it's fair that they be in the City limits. A discussion in the area with residents would be advisable. r Scholls Ferry Road -- he would support approval without a neighborhood meeting. Walnut Street — overlayed because of a strong effort by the City with the County to finally get it done. Action needs to be is discussed in a meeting in that area. 121st Street — questions annexing this area the most since it is not surrounded by the City. g. Councilor Edwards commented that he can understand the apprehensions of the residents. He does not want anyone in the City of Tigard who does not want to be in the City. If the annexations under consideration tonight are going to give people Page 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 the inference or create areas whereby people would be forced to annex, then he would be opposed to those. Councilor Edwards has great concerns with how the City of Tigard is going to maintain these roads. People should realize that the City has changed from a community of 2,000 to a community of 22,000 and now has a competent staff available. Councilor Edwards believes in the neighborhood process; therefore, the entire issue should be brought before the residents to make the decision. At this point in time, he is opposed to these annexations because they are perceived by the community as a "sneak play" by the City of Tigard. h. Councilor Johnson basically agreed with Councilor Edwards. She added that the City has had conversations with both the elected officials and the staff of the County. Those people are saying that they cannot continue to maintain the local neighborhood roads. Any recent County maintenance is the last they can afford. Councilor Johnson would welcome the opportunity for a separate meeting with the neighborhood. She suggested that a County representative be at this meeting to say race-to-face to the neighborhood group what the Council and staff has been hearing them say. i. Councilor Eadon supports the other Councilors' statements She, too, would like to see a County representative at the neighborhood meeting. j . City Administrator recommended that an informational meeting be held as a joint, City-sponsored meeting to the NPO meeting. k. Public Hearing closed. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 86-109 A RESOLUTION FURTHERING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT A AND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT B ATTACHED. (SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD) ZCA 11-86. M. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to adopt. Discussion on the motion: Councilor Johnson and Edwards held that they would be opposed to this annexation as it was included in their comments that a neighborhood informational meeting should be called. City Administrator informed that State Statute does allow cities to form L.I.D. 's with properties that are outside City limits. It is procedurally more awkward. Staff's recommendation would be that consideration be given to a Council priority; that is, formation of the 135th Street L.I.D. and to coordinate that with :. the Scholls Ferry improvements. Therefore, the Scholls Ferry right-of-way annexation proposal is slightly different (from a policy standpoint) from the other three issues. Motion approved by a 3-2 majority of the Council present; Councilors Edwards and Johnson voting "Nay." 11 Page 7 --COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 a ii n. City Administrator reported that the County, on October il, is presenting the County 2000 report at Meridian Park Hospital. The County has been sorting out roles and responsibilities of what it can do as a County and what it has been doing as a city. The County will be presenting its proposal for the future and clarifying what they cannot do any longer. Suggested that the neighborhood meeting be held after the October 11 Symposium so the residents would have a better idea of any other options available to them. o. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards, that items 5.1 Fonner Street, 5.3 Walnut Street, 5.4 121st Avenue, be u tabled to November 17th. ,4 Approved by a unanimous vote of the Council present. P. Staff will pick a date with NPO in late October that works for the informational meeting which will go in the Newsletter and paper. 6. COUNCIL REVIEW HEARING - CU-386 - TRI-MET TRANSIT CENTER - NPO 01 A request by the Tigard City Council to review the Hearings Officer approval with conditions of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of an off-street transit center in the CBD (Central =a Business District). (WCTM 2S1 2AA, Lots 4800 6 4901). This will be an "argument type" hearing only. The Council will consider only the record before the Hearings Officer, which is on file at City Hall. The Council shall not consider any new testimony or evidence which is not in the record. a. Review Hearing opened. b. Community Development Director reviewed the concerns of Council expressed at the last meeting. C. Bob Post, Assistant General Manager, Tri-Met commented that the proposed transit station is part of a series of facilities on the west side of the region. Primary purpose is to allow Tri--Met to provide a transit focal point and for better transit service within the local community. In 1982, Conditional Use approval was granted for the project of a different design. He believes the now design is an improvement. d. Joe Walsh, Project Manager on Tigard Transit Center (as well as other projects in the western region) made a presentation to the Council. Highlights of his talk include the following: o Moving the main bus stops off the street but it is not a "Park and Ride." --- two or three drop off spaces will be available. 'FS+ Page 8 COUNCIL.MINUTES - SEPTEMBER',22, 1986 o Purchased the land in 1982. A plan was approved which included three bus parking positions on Commercial Street, two-way driveways and two-way internal circulation, and shared access with the Greyhound terminal area. In the intervening three years the site was acquired, Lottery money has become available, and Tigard has developed some plans for the downtown. The plan looks considerably different than what was presented in 1982. o New plan provides for one--way access both at the driveways and internally (busses will enter at northern end and exit at southern end of the site). o Access for Greyhound has been isolated so that cars and trucks coming into Greyhound terminal aren't mixing with the bus traffic. o All but two busses will be parked on the site; those two will be parked on Commercial Street. o The Greyhound Terminal stays but loading will be done on the site and not on Commercial Street as is done now. o Tri--Met is negotiating with Southern Pacific Railroad to add another 25 feet to the back of the site which will allow them to move the busses further back. This will work better with the City's plan for Commercial Street and allows for improved amenities for passenger loading and landscaping. o Pedestrian traffic will be channeled for safety through design criteria. o There will be no change in service; busses are being scheduled to arrive and depart in a more focused and timed way. o Tri-Met will work with local businesses to discourage this site being used as a Park and Ride station. o Will be removing existing bus stops from Commercial and Main Street. There will be five to seven parking spaces replaced and bus traffic removed from Main Street. o There are adequate sight distances and gaps in traffic at this site for bus movement. Z.: o There will be minimal new traffic at the intersection of =, Main and Commercial. There will be an additicoal eight left turns in the peak hours from Main Street onto Commercial. The reason the impact is so minor is that most of the busses are making that move now and delays are not being experienced. Page 9 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 e, Public Testimony 1. Geraldine Ball, 11515 S. W. 91st supports this proposal. S. W. Commercial 2, D. R. Ratty, Cascade Mobile Villa, 8915 in front of the Street noted problems with bus parking driveway. Is concerned about additional cars parking on the traffic flow through his Mobile Home street and increased Park which is hazardous to pedestrians in the Park. the 3. Marcia Gaiser, 10595 S. W. Century k transit wouldcentliker to the parking problem solved by moving the vicinity of the old library. is concerned about moving the Tri-Met Station into an already crowded area. f, Community Development Director recommended that the Conditional Use Permit be granted with the conditions that the Hearings Officer stipulated at the August 27, 1986 Hearing. g, Council questions and comments directed to staff and representatives of Tri-Met followed. Of greatest concern were parking problems in this area as well as increased traffic. Discussed at length were different ot methods muof parking enforcement, problems experienced by similar situations, and options now available to forestall these difficulties. � Chief of Police Lehr generally supports the transit center concept but has some concerns about traffic rflow ndand ridavailable rrk n parking. As downtown development occurs, Pa existing parking will be forced into the street and already lots. Cautioned the City and Tri-Met to closely mold gr develop rking and be prepared to develop additional on-site pa other park-and-ride sites on the various arn us bus routes efforts.or be prepared to assume the costs Pa rking Community Development Director commented that he thought the Transit Center would lee a welcome addition in terms of new construction and might possibly stimulate motivation for additional development on Commercial Street. The removal of the ke busses from Commercial Street and Main Street been arobably continwill uing traffic a little bit safer, Parking has problem downtown and is not one which Tri-Met created. This Center will probably add to the problem somewhat. A non--remonstrance agree.„ent may be advit is rosblem actually isCeTri-Met able known what the impact of the parking P percentage could be asked to participate in a L.I.D. by paying a P of the construction costs for additional off-street parking. Legal Counsel ad ta sed eriaoof time (i.e. , 60 days) to study tthe ime Iin their ten lthe could give Tri-Me Period acceptability of a waiver of non-remonstrance. h, Review Hearing closed. Page 10 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 i. RESOLUTION NO, 86-110 IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A FINAL ( ORDER UPON CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF A HEARING'S OFFICER APPROVAL OF ` A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE (CU 3-86), TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON, ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Moved by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Johnson to approve. There was considerable discussion on the motion. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Brian to amend the motion on the floor by adding the following conditions to Resolution No. 86-110: 1. The 25-foot acquisition from Southern Pacific Railroad is to be completed. 2. Tri-Met will post reasonable signage as is necessary and requested by the property owners. 3. A non--remonstrance clause wherein Tri-Met will be required to pay fees for parking improvements. The fees will be based on a standard parking space size and applied to the spaces being used as on-site parking. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to further amend the motion on the floor by requiring that Section 8.b. of the Resolution be changed to read: "Location and design of parking spaces (minimum of four)." Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. The Mayor called for a vote of the motion on the floor as amended. Motion approved by a 3-2 majority of the Council present; Councilors Eadon and Johnson voting "Nay." 7. Frontier Market/Randall Land Swap Discussion Was deleted from the Agenda. 8. Municipal Code Revision - Genesis Loop Parking - Ordinance no. 96-45A a. Community Development Director reported that this is a request by some residents of Genesis Loop Run for an Ordinance to stipulate "No Parking" at the entrance to Genesis Loop off of S. W. 115th. The Police Department agreed that the "No Parking," as suggested, would be in the best interests of public safety. Staff recommends that the Council adopt the ordinance and direct staff j to mark the area accordingly. f Page 11 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 3:. b. ORDINANCE 86-45A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENT CHAPTER ` 10.28, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON A PORTION OF SW GENESIS LOOP, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. C. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to adopt Ordinance 86-45A. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 9. STREETS SDC REBATE REQUEST - Tigard Christian Church a. Community Development Director reported that in Chapter 3, Section 20.055 of the Tigard Municipal Code there :s a provision for property owners to receive a credit against System Development Charges for construction of extra capacity (Collectors and Arterials) street improvements. Tigard Christian Church has paid $5,600.00 in systems development charges. Staff has deemed that they are eligible for a refund of $4,428.52 and now recommends that the Council authorize a refund in that amount. b. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to refund said amount. Approved by a unanimous vote of the Council present. 10. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ROLE DISCUSSION Tabled to a future meeting. li. JACK PARK REPORT Tabled to a future meeting. 12.A. PARKS PLAWRECREATION ROLE WORKPLAN PROPOSAL a. Community Development Director reported that this is a request by the Staff for authorization to hire a contractor to work with the planning staff to complete the City Park Plan. At the session - between tho Council and the Park Board a few months ago, the Park k Board requested additional resources to get this plan moving. 'The request is for Council to authorize staff to contract with Deborah Knechtel to complete the the City Park Plan in an amount x not to exceed $11,000. Community Development Director will bring back to Council the necessary documentation for a transfer of funds from Contingency in the form of a resolution if so authorized. Councilor Eadon further explained the processes which had taken ask ; place prior to the recommendation tonight. - . Page 12 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 � T, u b. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Brian, to // authorize staff to bring back to Council a resolution t, transferring funds from Contingency and then entering into a contract with Deborah Knechtel. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 13. CONSENT 1: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 13.1 Approve Council Minutes - August 18, September 3 & 10, 1986 13.2 Receive and File: a. Community Development Land Use Decisions b. Departmental Monthly Reports 13.3 Approve Agreement with State of Oregon Re: Hall/Burnham Improvements - Authorize Mayor and Recorder to Sign; Resolution 86-111. 13.4 Approve Training Request - City Engineer - $225.00 Approve Training Request - Engineering Tech - $299.88 Approve Training Request - Engineering Tech - $294.88 13.5 Approve Tidel Cable Franchise Transfer Deadline Extension - Resolution No. 66-112. 13.6 Approve Chief of Police Employment Agreement Addendum - Consensus of Council to Table to a future meeting. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Brian, to approve. Approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 14. Nan-Agenda Items •j. 14.1 School Fee Waiver Community Development Director reported that Tigard High School has a home construction class which formed a non-profit corporation several years ago. Each year they build a house in Tigard and request that Council waive the permit fees and and the plan check fees. The high school would pay all other fees. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to waive the building permit and plan check fees as suggested by staff. Approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 24.2 Capital Improvement Program List Adjustment Page 13 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 . a. Community Development Director reported that the staff has recently reviewed the Capital Improvement Project and has identified a project that they would like to elevate on list of priority projects. There are significant drainage problems in the Summer Lake/Anton Park area. The cost is "~ somewhere in the vicinity of $10,000 to $20,000. Staff suggests that Council elevates this project as a priority item over two other projects, the southwest Murdock Street drainage line and the Gentle Woods manhole and line repair. Both of these projects are not ready to go> The Summer Lake/Anton Park project is a fairly simple Project, but one that does involve quite a bit of time and should be initiated prior to the really bad weather. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Eadon to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 14.3 I-5 Corridor a. City Administrator announced that the I-5 Corridor Association is sponsoring a symposidm on economic development over the next four years in the Tigard/I--5 area. The date of the symposium is Wednesday, 0ctober 8, at the Holiday Inn in Wilsonville. City Administrator corrected an earlier statement made by him at this meeting that the County 2000 meeting will be held at the Meridian Park Hospital; it will be held at the Tuality Hospital in Hillsboro. RECESS COUNCIL MEETING: 10:03 PM RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING: 30:11 PM Mayor Cook left the meeting; Council President Tan Brian presided from this point on. 14. Agenda Item 12.6. STAFFING PLAN AUTHORIZATION was discussed. Consensus of Council to hold two meetings scheduled for Wednesday, September 24 at 5:30 p.m. and Monday, September 29 at 6:30 p.m. 15. Executive Session Cancelled. _ . 16. ADJOURNMENT: 10:18 PM ;. sting City Recorder — City of Tigard ATTEST• or — City of Tigard gy cw:4202A/0028A Page-'COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 kr TIMES PUBL1SHM %o4MAPANY Legal 7-6832 P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(W3)684.0-W Notice BEAVERTON,OREGON 97076 Legal Notice Advertising RECEIVED *City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice S F P 2 3 1986 P. O. Box 23397 Y p Duplicate Affidavit CITY OF TIGMD OTigard, OR 97223 • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OK-GON. CITY OF WASHMTON. yas. 'dam first duly sworn. depose and sayyer that I am the Adverth** Diff--40r.or his principa 1lerk c ,of theJ:.�fl r d m 1 s a of general ckculstion as defined in ORS 1931 lu the and 163.020;Published at m� pard aforesaid county and stats,that the A,,.+{ r e �.- r+nnnf.- 1 Rs►v»l sir Wir�wt.i ng a prb*W copy of which is hereto annexed,was published in the Mire haus of said newspaper for 8ucc®ssive and ire in the following laws*' Sent 1$�a9�� bef"e me ih��¢-�4'►sr i S l Q A _ pry Public for Oregon Mx Cwn'al�aw� s e3t20/88 AFFIDA r k i� TWES P LISMHO COMPANY Ls" 7-6823 ;4 P.O.SOX 370 PHONE(503)684.0360 Notice BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising Cit of Tigard • Y • ❑ Tearshest Notice P. O. Box 23397 Fs * Tigard, 0 R 97223 • O Duplicate Affidavit AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION SBTOREGON F�K3 OF W $ . TON. 3 . 1. Stenhani E Nipuna g-r being*at duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Advertising Director.or his principal clerk.of the I' d Ti m P s a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 ry and 19& published at fi i a a r d in the aforesaid county and stats;that the Publi5. Hearin Notice a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was puWishsd in the entire issue of said newspaper for successive and consecutive In the following looms: Sept 11, 1986 8ubacribsd a to before me tMe S e p t 1 1 _ 1 o R A . 4 Owo Notary Public for Oregon W Commission Expires: 9/20/88 AFFIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed September 22nd Special Council Executive Session STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss. City of Tigard 1, Cathy Wheatley being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Notice of Public Hearing of the Cancellation of the September 22nd Sip-ecial Council Executive Session. a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 22nd day of September . 19 86 1. Tigard Civic Center 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon > f §ubscribed and sworn to before me this 2'1 day of ANotay Public for Oregon <. Affidavit of Posting My Commission Expires: CITY OF TIGARD September 22, 1986 CANCELLATION OF MEETING e special Executive Session Council meeting, Notice is hereby given that th duly posted September 19, 1986, called for September 22, 1986 at 5:00 p.m. to be held at the Tigard Civic Center Conference Room, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon has been cancelled. City Reco er ew14177A f u. .:� - �..t...r�•.r=te - -r rc;+ j ,r September 19, 1986 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that a special Executive Session Council meeting, called by the Magyar with the common consent of the Council, will be held on 4 _ September 22, 1986, at 5:00 PM in the Tigard Civic Center Conference Room, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. The meeting is called for the purpose of holding an Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a) to consider employment of a public officer. 4 John E. Cook, Mayor t , u. - AF„i'IAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss. City of Tigard a I, Cathy Wheatley being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Notice of public Hearing of the Special Executive Session of the Quanil a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 19thday of _September , 1986 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 S. W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. 2. U. S. National Bank, 12160 S. W. Bain, Tigard, Oregon. v, v Subscribed and sworn-to`before met s ay of Notary. Public for Oregon Affidavit of- Posting My;Commission Expires:,,f { r CITY OFTICARD j September 19, 1986 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that ai special Executive Session Council meeting, called by the Mayor with the common consent of the Council, will be held on September 22, 1986, at 5:00 PM in the Tigard Civic Center Conference Room, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. The meeting is called for the purpose of holding an Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a) to consider employment of a public officer. /s/John E. Cook, Mayor t 4143A t h CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING g In the Matter of the Proposed COUNCIL ADOPTED ORDINANCES STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss City of Tigard ) I, being first duly sworn. on oath depose and say: That •I posted in the fol owing public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) � which were adopted at the Council, Meeting dated copy(s) of said ordi ce(s) bei hereto attach and by reference made a part hereof, on the do day of � - 1986. 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon 3. ., Tigard, Oregon 6 bs ;ibe"'and sworn to before ale this al2tay of - 1986. L ? - lWotary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: i� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Q t ORDINANCE NO. 86---�/ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON A PORTION OF OF SW GENESIS LOOP, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That Section 10.28.130 of the Tigard Municipal code, relating to locations where parking is prohibited at any time, be, and the aame ;is hereby amended and supplemented to add thereto a new subsection reading as follows: "10.28.130 Prohibited at any time. No person shall at any time park or leave standing a vehicle of any kind or character, whether motorized or not, and whether attended or unattended, within the following defined portions of public streets and highways within the City: ( } Within the curblines on each side of SW Genesis Loop, extending from the most southerly intersection thereof with SW 115th Avenue easterly a distance of 166 feet. Section 2: That the City Administrator be and he is hereby authorized and directed to cause to have the areas in which parking is prohibited as above set forth suitably posted in the manner provided by law. Section 3: Inasmuch as this parking prohibition is necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the public and in particular pedestrians on said street an emergency is recognized to exist and is hereby declared and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage and approval by the City Council. PASSED: By �, ` r+i aLS vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 3i. day Of - ', 1986.A9nR.rW?i1son, r Act rig City Recorder APPROVED: This d day of 1986. o E. Cook, Malyor JH:mj2 ORDINANCE NO. ;Paige ,l a w 0 S •� L $3 95 9100 vJ 94 74 to s•° 60 R... » 1Q f M 7g 84 �y�t Ld •' i WQ47 •� •* 42-» 4)4Z rrD 7) z 10200 ;Cb TT f ? 4? 96 a �� 73 w�C 44 •j4!! 4y A 4r•6c aw �P ��.�= o 11,000 a 10300 1o9o0 66 �4 J �, �• ° 10800 3 67 11100 '0, as a a 68 +° iRAC M staESTOM-M6c P 4 7600 t 8 10600 $24�. °s s� 1 7500 .r 4s. .�� �7s6a ;, S 6pto 10500 , 69 , s 11200 60 _ 10400 4 TA °,► 6300 65TI cr 3 6200 CA 23 +° �s `°ti •dl L 11503aMs'a'a &W.TERRACE »as{s s.o° �!►+°*Seipp 4, 24 t�• 1300 `♦ � 47 44 � M.47 62 � ♦ my 640 5'c TRAMS DRIVE 22 •r s 64 :1400 '3 , r■ � � a r b6500 6100 ♦ +• � 63 ° :5� _ a N _ 1p i. ••6o � s�'s 6 ' 1800 `b 21 oq fy► s.10 25 30 se epi♦ s ' t0 5700 5900 6000 '4 s SEE MAP Ul) b� _ �a. e^ 6600 9 0 5800 s 'E' s+ 1900 !'• 7m t' 26i� 29 Q 2S i 3CA rP 12 1700 r 20 I s.' 0 * 0 2000 1� 111\ s�� , 59po +4 28 j "� s; ` * r -1y ` IA x 6700 27 ' 1600 so c_ + ,oP 4100 14 r .� Z 10sq 19 < t9t aT 39 .t 1500 a t 4e4t y,s0 O 2100y 9 a @ G<�Es�s 4000 4200 f , w » IS 4!! G�1 P s TR AM so38 g40 f� o q A •17 1'%7a�r M46 ai yg 2200 C 0 3300 0o e ��A®®���� t ztw M4 6I� 3200 µ =1 10 3900 4300 Z AV• ei/Iv bTP 2300 fao 18 a� ss'r q M1Z n E D 6 37 41 400 IT �� �1� 3400r Jaz° rn t 16 0� /tj 3100 32 6 m '•�' 4400 p 3 R •+ 5� 2700 ** C1 ,9 p 7 6n -0 3800 N y = 42 Ra' 3 t �� 3446 ',p3000 3500 VIP� � 36 a e w ° 28 2600 00 2900 b 33 3600 q fi �a 2500 4 ^ 5 6 = - !�� 43 1 2 34 35 $ ` h •INITIAL VOMIT Z w 06.6>?!s'e / WMAL P[ OW W 33n `/ e s 0"5v 04-w #30"77 .!` sua p 1 R ( 1 J`; 1 A\ Y 1 R r 1 1\4 1 1 SEE MAP X (Y 25 1 30C 1 • DATE `3'- �- AGENDA ITEM 0 _�__. — V]:SITOR'S AGENDA (Limited to 2 minutes or less. please) t please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from You on other issues not on the agenda. but asks that You first try to resolve Your concerns through staffplease a contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank ou- NAmE t ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED t.,. _ i ._ ;: ... _.. ....a .. _...._�._ i DATE Septeuibez 22. :1986 I wish to to sti:fi► Imfore ithe Mtgard ',Ci.;tY Council :nn xbe fallow qg It-am'- -(pl ease prlmt the i of ormati on') • t Item Destripz3on= Agenda Item lia. g. --- PONNER STREET pUBBLIC BEARING - RIGST. F-SWAY ,ANNEXATION #�kk#tk�frl�k�Ac�ktkik�k�tr�k#. *aklr#�kirirOr**�k**�Ic*�Id�:*ic�Ac*+1`�`##�r�akak+Mlt lsapo eat (For 3Lsue) 'oppcajeat (Against Issue) *« ,tet*,kir*.�.,kt�,��e ,�� rw►t��,�a�,�,r��,�+e�r+t+t�,�+rrr� ess sndfillation 3iame, Addres•c •and Affiliation � jIe' l3'Iu-- t -e �7 MATE September -22, 1986 !I wish zo ctestify :before .the TAgard .City ;Council .on rthe d dUoui4g J tem: .(Please ,print ithe :information) lzm :Descr::fption: AGENDA ITEM'N0. 5.2 __-SCROLLS EERY ROAD -- _RIGHT-OF-.WAY EANNEXATION �M�1#lk+kytey �kie*�k�la#iak�nArrlalaar#Mrlt�k�k�tdrdralrit�k Txgponeat ,(Tar Issue) `QFponent °'-('Against lssuC) s�Mirir*�r+k+Ar�* �tkk# �t�kit#�k�k##��ka�r�aalk�AMr�baMr�ilr�Ar�Ar�lr�e#�kytitieie flume, :`Address :and :Affiliation Wase, Address.and-Affiliation DATE -September 22, 1'9186 1l�4ish.-to .testify --befare -the ''T3gard'-City Council—On .:the following =item: (P-lease,print -the information) r Item pescriptioa: Agenda Item'No.-5 3-- WALNUT ,STREET-PUBLIC:AEA.*LING RIGHT—OF-WAY ANNEXATION 1proponent ;(For Assue) Opponent (Against Issue) �tsw*+�*�as��ss��*�►,�+�w,�,r*,�xs,�,�s**ass*as*�*s****�ss***nate*a*****aa**st****� ;Hama, i"Address,and�'Affiliation Name,?Address ;and'Affiliatioa Alec, P�?f e<�d S'scA_ CUA/l•.r x DATE Septer•ber 22, 1986 L.wish to testify before the Tigard City- Council-on the following: item: (Please printtheinformation) Item-Description: AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.4 -- 121st AVENUE PUBLIC HEARING RIGHT-GF-WAY ANNEXATION Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) ate*ere*e*es*e*ae**s*e*e***eta*ee*a**�r***ate****e�tr�e,�*e*a***►trr*,it,k*ear*rt�ee,��r**,a�,�**�* Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address andAffiliation / 2-2 -70- Su.J .'' � 3s'Sf'c'� 1 '�.L/ /.iii ./ �v ....f �/s/t $•�.t,.r'C. 5 �V t DATE Sevtember 22_ 1986 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: AGENDA ITEM NO. 6. COUNCIL REVIEW HEARING - CU 3--86 - TRI-MET TRANSIT CENTER - NFO #1 �r�tr�Arwtlrslll�kilr�lntdrlt+kir+t!llMi�ilw�klt+k+klM�iM�k�dritritltykrt�lr*fkik�ItitlYstAakinik 1lr�k�kit�ie�Y�lrilik#�k#�hytft#�tikit�lrrk�dt*��ieic�k*�* e `Proponent -(For -Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) its+rir*+�*+�a�,rdrrt+ir****itaestx�+r+rat,�*�t,ti►e*s+��tar�,rata+t*e�r,ne**iter**.roc**masse*e*e**s*+�****�*** Name, Address and Affiliation !lame, Address and Affiliation i Tr 12 i r x 3 �.y s u CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 22 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: _September 15, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA-TITLE: - Police Officer PREVIOUS ACTION: Oaths of Offic PREPARED BY: David C. Lehr DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: David C. Lehr POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The Police Department is hiring 4 new Police Officers during the next week. Their names are: Larry Raglione, Michael Hintz, David Warren, and Jeannie Gard. The Mayor will administer the oaths of office at the meeting of the 22nd since it is cable--aired. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED --- FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION �,lw/41WA CITY OF TIG RD OREGON j. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 22, 1986 _ DATE SUBMITTED: September 15, 1985 _ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Presentation PREVIOUS ACTION: of Keys to the City PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Council POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The following individuals have terminated their service on the Utilities and Franchises Committee and should be presented keys to the City for their service. LaValle Allen Marcia Gaiser ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL IMPACT BUGMSTED ACTION -Receive avid File !R ��lw/�t137A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY t' AGENDA OF: September 22, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 10, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Fonner Street PREVIOUS ACTION: None Right-of-way Annexation ZCA 12-86 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council forward an annexation request to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission to annex the SW Fanner Street right•-of--way between SW Walnut Street and SW 121st Avenue? INFORMATION SUMMARY In the past year, the City staff has had numerous contacts with citizens who use Fonner on a regular basis about the possibility of improving SW Fanner. Since Fonner is not within the City limits, the street remains under the jurisdiction of Washington County. The County has indicated to City staff that improvements to and maintenance of SW Fonner is a low priority for County funds. In order to obtain jurisdiction of SW Fonner, the City staff would like to annex the SW Fonner right-of-way at this time. Attached is a resolution to forward the proposal to the Boundary Commission. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached resolution and forward the proposal to the Boundary Commission. 2. Deny the proposal. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached resolution to forward the annexation proposal to the Boundary Commission. � . (br126) 1/ /1l 1■ ■/■■ ltd■ 16 On a.�rr�� ■�■■ a 1�• ��: `�■; - ?i► 1W long rte• �� � �� r � t� .. ►,. . ';.. 93 ■11111 ..��r UPS 0 t Vis• ,:,i�l� � :tit-�� ��� �.�^�' 1► .r willRII JIM , allow PRE mom NINON imom ,VE� , , �, � ���'� 1�! ■■ moll ♦ � fit+ �� � ■r1►� i I�. ■ �� � CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION FURTHERING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "A" AND DESCRIBED EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED. (Fonner Street) ZCA 12-86. hearing September 22, 1986,he Cit (toncons concil of sider annexatiohe City of n Tigard dFonner street bight--of-+r�ayn Sep and WHEREAS, ORS 1.99.4^"j (1)(a) gives the governing body the authority to proceed with a minor boundary change by adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has determined that the annexation of the Fonner street right-of-way is in the best interest of the citizens of Tigard; WHEREAS, the proposed annexation is in accordance with ORS 490 and constitutes a "minor boundary change" under Boundary Commission Law, 199.410 to 199.5!.0. MIM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1: The Council hereby approves the proposed annexation and requests the Commission to approve it and effect it as soon as possible. es of o file ed Section 2: resolution thePortland Metropolitanf1 thAreap1 The CRecorder is hereby directed t Local the Government Boundary Commission at once. PASSED: This clay of 1986. fr t�►yor - City of Tigard ATT£ST: Acting City Retarder - City of Tigard (br126) 'i L RESOLUTION No. 86- t s'�� i �„\1'r — — �x SW Fanner Street Those portions of SW Fanner Street (County Roads 358 and 495) located in Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, oregon, described as follows: Parcel I Beginning at the point of intersection of the North right-of-way line of SW Fanner Street (County Road 358) with the West right--of--way line of SW Fanner Street (County Road 495); thence westerly on said North right-of-way line approximately 1,117 feet to the intersection hence with the East outherly right-of-way said East line of SW 121st Avenue (County Road 358); right-of-way line 40 feet to the South right-of-way line of said SW Fanner Street; thence easterly, on said South right-of-way line and its easterly extension approximately 1,150 feet to the intersection with the East right-of-way line of SW 115th Avenue (County Road 358); thence northerly on said East right-of-way line 20 feet to the East right-of-way line of SW Fanner Street (County Road 495); thence on the East right-of-way line of said County Road 495, approximately 440 feet to an angle point in said right--of-way line; thence easterly on the South right-of-way line of SW Fanner Street (County Road 495) approximately 1,210 feet to the intersection with the existing city limits of the City of Tigard; thence North 25010'30" Wost, on said city limits approximately 22 feet to the centerline of said SW Fanner Street, and the northeast corner of that tract conveyed to Gerald J. Grover, et ux, by deed in Book 823, Page 89, Washington County Dead Records; thence westerly on said centerline and said existing city limits approximately 180 feet to the West line of the John L. Hicklin DLC 37; thence North 24048' West on said DLC liras { approximately 22 feet to the North right-of-way line of said SW Fanner Street (County Road 494); thence on said North right-of-way line and leaving said existing city limits, westerly approximately 1,050 feet to the West right-of-way line of SW Fanner Street; thence southerly, on said West right-of-way line, 462.8 feet to the point of beginning; containing approximately 2.5 acres. Parcel II Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 11, Echo Heights, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records. said southeast corner also being on the centerline of SW Fanner Street (County Road 495); thence northerly on the East line of said Lot 11, 20 feet to the North right-of-a►ay line of said SW Fanner Street; thence northeasterly on said North right-of-way line approximately 910 feat to the southeast corner of Lot 15, said Echo Heights and the West right--of--easy line of SW Fanner Street; thence North 00057' East on said West right-of-away line approximately 825 feet to the intersection with the centerline of SW Walnut Street (County Road 494) and the existing city limits of the City of Tigard; thence easterly on said centerline and said city limits 20 feet to the intersection with the centerline of SW Tiedeman Avenue (County Road 495); thence northerly on the centerline of said SW Tiedeman Avenue approximately 150 feet to the westerly extension of the North boundary line of Cottonwood Place, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence easterly on said extension 25 feet to the East right-of-way line of said t _ County Road 495; thence southerly on said East right-of-way line approximately 980 feat to the existing city limits of the City of Tigard; thence southwesterly on said city limit approximately 20 feet to an angle point in r �r the centerline of SW Fonner Street; thence southwesterly on said centerline and said existing city limits approximately 920 feet to the southeast corner � . of said Lot 11, Echo Heights, being the point of beginning, containing approximately 1.3 acres. mj 13 _k Al z; y {t� x. AGENDA ITEM STAFF REPORT September 22, 1986 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: ZCA 12--86 Ione Change Annexation REQUEST, To annex the SW Fonner Street right-of-way frog SW Walnut Street to SW 121st Avenue. esignat COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: street i no�°nne�ileGtor on d the Cityasof Tigard Transportation Plan Map. APPLICANT. City of Tigard OWNER, Public Right-*fy 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: Fonner Street is located between SMI Walnut Street and SW 121st Avenue. (WCTM 2S1 3AD, 2S1 3AC, 2S1 38D, 2S1 3CA, 291 3DB). 2. Background In the past year. City staff has had numerous contacts with citizens regarding the inadoquato condition of SW Fonner Street for vehicle and pedestrian traffic. Since SW Fanner Street is nohe t within the C.i�ty Baits, it remains under the jurisdiction of Washington County. County hes indicated to City staff the# improvements to and maintenance of SW Fonner is a low priority for County funds, The City staff would like to annex the SW Fonn*r Street right-of-way and then request jurisdiction of the right-of-w&y from Washington County. �ticinitY Intor�ti�or Vim' fo trier Street serves as the major rout* for a large residential area from SW Walnut to SW111st. A majority of the area is dew`loped as low ity residential although there are some vacant parcels. The only other designated collector route to serve residents in this area is SM 115th Avenue. 1=4= - 2C 12-86 (SW Fonner Right-of-Wary) - pegs 1 w. 4. Site Information Fonner street is designated as a minor collector on the City's Comprehensive Plan Map. The right-of-way width varies from 40 to 45 feet in width. There are two 10 feet travel lanes and a minimal shoulder which is not paved. S. Agency and NPO Comments No written comments had been received at the writing of this report. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1 and 10.1.2 and Chapter 18. 136 of the Community Development Code. The Planning staff has determined that the proposal as submitted is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: a. Plan Policy 2. 1 .1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. b. Pian Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the Police Department has been notified and the land is located within Tigard's Urban Planning Area. The Planning Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: a. Chapter 18.136 is met because the applicant has met all sof the approval standards. C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning Staff recommends approval of 2CA 12-86 subject to the following conditions: 1. The City of Tigard Police Department shall review the proposal. PREPARED BY: Elizabeth A. Newton WR6kb BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director, Community Development (br126) STAFF REPORT - ZCA 12-86 (SW Fonner Right--of-Vay) -- Page 2 Jam. September 19. 1986 aa—gio TO: Tigard City Council: REFERENCE: File f ZCA 12-86 Fonner Street Annexation As residents of the Tigard area for 14 years now we feel we have a good perspective as to the 'goings on' and therefore feel compelled to give you our opinions regarding the annexation of Fonner Street. First we feel this is a 'veiled' attempt to once again force-annex this neighborhood. An annexation nobody wants as they see little advantage to being to the city limits of Tigard (Rlease note we do jive wi tl,�the city liu�). This is further supportedby your own newsletter that lists the transfer of road/street responsibility from Washington County to the City of Tigard. No what* in your newsl*tter is annexation mentioned &s A condition of this maintenance takeover. If indeed this is a sneak attempt to annex this area it shows the members of the city council have little regard for their constituents. present and future! A forced annexation is, to us, a very negative approach and shows & great deal of arrogance on the part of the City Council and especially the City Administrator Inc surprise there)I you will. if you carry throught with this devious attempt, just gain para city residents that can help rote down the 'dtiusions Of grondure' certain folks down at City Nail have exibited for sometime Raw. It From what we understand this latest annexation case about as the result of neighborhood eeetingf where sent folks in certain sub-divisions that exit out an to Fonner c*mplaimed about the condition of to* street. Va fikea this to OeaAle who mora andAgas to an in rout a m 1 n ut he pots i Fenner has had potool*f since we neve ort so if one does n`t like the road way did they save %ato in toe first #,act? •y the way there are sows advantages to the rough reads speed c00tral helps the most notable. Even with the rough send/tlons tht Is mph speed limit is Sxcended by we would guess &8 oxcass of 10 mph *a average. We would suggest the complainers simply slow down to within tam speed Unit and they will experlencs a such smoother ride and fess car repair billsl furtb*rs*r* we feel the City and County ars responsible far tae degradation to Posner by allowing sub-divisions to snit Out Rate svb-stAedsrd rands to tam first place without asking the dovslepsrs bring the 'c011ectors' up to 64841* too excessive Additional traffic. you also pushed the North *84 of list% open to Fenner se now Fanner Is tea lull powatalm by-pass to Ill Red Washington Square. let's At least Out Stop signs at every career oo fosoor and IIS as people will so back to using pacific highway for their taraugh traffic as it was iateedod. reaper is a astgaborhood also? collector Red should stay pad be used that wayl a pp2X X241 weste"peaait ltvtno Oe racer, to ear ter roar load &ed traaloortett__ elam8lae slstatesI growth sad d&ve/opeoat are t!ev/table but tae way it's managed borders a0 criminal rob from the poor (individual load Swears) and give to tot rich (devet*pnrsll !tail* *n toe subject of speed 1t occurs to we the maxi ites of buslaoss. after forcing the propr+rty afr*ntips foseer to too City, will be as LID which low of as can afford Rad will •lass reaper. that destroying the mate rows• p*Oplt live *0 reaper - the b*astiful trn& 110#4 caustry leas look of toe street. sotediat wilt is re st and will tbt s#eala is the aub•alrlafes r Ig'a bare to travel Ally—Ab—out a nuarter allall& as too �&�i„a,0e*sem,1 6a�e t4 mar Or LhOss Is*?evemeltts h 114iit Rert eaa18 1010#1 190 ?miens smartest If the road is 'ieprsv*4' we pr*dict manly will put there places up far %*1*' eit6*r because, %%*, cea't afford too LID and/or the quality of lift will be so dtsiaisha# they can't tolerate it. Tigard bas always bad a cartel* Coors about it. A charm that br*mgbt many of as to live %ere. 11 you wont plastic Cheese s*av*rton or Gresham . Our very *w0 little fan Jos*/Santa ROS44sl ago,, W# Savo pev&r lived In R neighborhood where neighbors Csrsd tor* &beat SACS Other sod loot net after each other as Soca as i* this area. Also the City staff is nest belpfol Sad caring of Its cltit*aS. It Seelig $trams# to as the City Council sad Administrator show such disregard for the pt"I'll If ler are successful with this attempt Rod the results we predict come true we will be very sorry that we savied toe Charles Sod ROSO Tigard hems# from the bullaoter pad •ovoa it late this naighborbood. `A Regrettably yours. PAS{ s Judy rets!&r 111th *W teams#r Tl' OR 91223_ ...5..-- 1 G���l O.� ���r�r�,7�nf C os,.ar�',`t /9�r�'s'�f•��r' ,Ta /iv ,d --fS oovV Ci4 or Al r a y CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 22, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 10,1986 — ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Scholls Ferry PREVIOUS ACTION: None Road Right-of-wav Annexation ZOA 11-86 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth A. Newton DEPT HEAD OK ` -CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Community Developeent POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council forward an annexation request to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission to annex the south side of the Scholls Ferry Road right-of-way between S.W. 130th and SW 135th? INFORMATION SUMMARY SW Scholls Ferry Road is designated as an arterial and is maintained as a State Highway. Currently, most of Scholls Ferry Road north of the centerline from SW 135th to Hwy. 217 is within the City of Beaverton. Except for the portion under consideration here, the right-of-way south of the centerline from SW 135th is within the City of Tigard. The Beaverton and Tigard Police Deparments feel that police services could be more efficiently provided by one jurisidiction. The Police Departments have agreed that SW Scholls Ferry should be entirely within Beaverton's jurisdiction. Priam to transferring jurisdiction to the City of Beaverton, the City of Tigard would like to ensure that the City's concerns are addressed for the full length of the Scholls Ferry Rand right-of-way. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached resolution and ordinance to forward the annexation proposal to the Boundary omission. 2. Deny the proposal. FISCAL.SUOGESTM ACTION Adopt the attached resolution to forward the annexation proposal to the Bury Commission. /br125 ti - TEM Now MAP Air mummy --'4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT m am N! X11 o/ SOON i � ► ■t � M r i .. �� s •ate :�-- --~ • :� •• Cm In �►�► . ,� ���+�.+'�. '� sur r� i r � r . ' AGENDA ITEM STAFF REPORT September 22, 1986 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: ZCA 11-86 Zone Change Annexation REQUEST: To annex the south side of the Scholls Ferry Road right-of-way from SW 130th to SW 135th. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: SW Scholls Ferry Road is designated as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: Public Right-of-tea} 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: The portion of SW Scholls Ferry Road under consideration is located between SW 130th and SW 135th. (WCi'M 1S1 33A). 2. Background SW Scholls Ferry Road is designated as an arterial on the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan map and is maintained as a State Highway. Currently Ski Scholls Ferry Road, north of the centerline is within the City of Beaverton. The right--of-way south of the centerline is within the City of Tigard except for the portion being considered in this application. The Beaverton and Tigard Police Departments agree that police services could be more efficiently provided by one police agency backing the Oregon State Police. The City of Beaverton and the City of Tigard have agreed that SW Scholls Ferry Road should be entirely within the City of Beaverton. Prior to transferring jurisdiction to the City of Beaverton, the City of Tigard would like to annex the last remaining section of right--of-way to ensure that the City's concerns for future improvements to SW Scholls Ferry Road are addressed with the transfer. 3. Vicinity Information The land which abuts the south side of SW Scholls Ferry between SW 130th and SW 135th is vacant. The property is designated for medium high density residential development (25 units per acre). STAFF REPORT - ZOA 11-96 (SW Scholls Ferry Rd.) - PAGE 2 2 4. Site Information ( Scholls Ferry Road is designated as an arterial on the City's Comprehensive Plan Map. Currently the right-of-way between SW 130th and SW 135th is approximately 65 feet wide. Scholls Ferry Road is not improved to arterial street standards between SW 130th and SW 135th. There are two 12 feet travel lanes with paved shoulders. 5, Agency and NPO Comments No written comments had been received at the writing of this report. 8. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1 and 10.1.2 and Chapter 16.136 of the Community Development Code. The Planning Staff has determined that the proposal as submitted is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted bele: M. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. b. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the Police Department has ` been notified and the land is located within Tigard's Urban Planning Area. The Planning Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: a. Chapter 18.136 is not because the applicant has met all of the approval standards. C. REtOMlENDATION Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning Staff recommends approval of ZCA 11-86 subject to the following conditions: 1. The City of Tigard Police Department shall review the proposal. P BY:1ltz=t1h A. Newton AP ED BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director, Community Development (br125) STAFF REPORT - ZOA 11-86 (SW Scholls Ferry Rd.) - PAGE 3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY { AGENDA OF: September 22, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 11, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Walnut Street PREVIOUS ACTION: None Right-of-Way Annexation ZCA 14-86 PREPARED BY: Elizabath A. Newton DEPT HEAD OK �, CITY ADMIN OK _ REQUESTED BY: Community Development POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council forward an annexation request to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission to annex the Walnut Street right-of-quay between SW Fonner Street and SW 135th? INFORMATION SUMMARY In order to pian for an allow construction of future improvements to the transportation system in the Walnut Street/121st Avenue neighborhood, City staff would like to annex all of the Walnut Street right-of--way between SW Tiedeman and SW 135th. Attached is a resolution to forward the proposal to the Boundary Commission. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached resolution to forward the annexation proposal to the Boundary Commission. 2. Deny the proposal. FISCAL IMPACT SUt;G£STED ACTION Adopt the attached resolution to forward the annexation proposal to the Boundary Commission. /br129 ■ a/o r■[nook ,4'��'l1RR/R1a t�.�� j � ►rte mw IND Box � "■��•• er � fir tl��• � i ■■ cr• ` '�. � � = © •moi �.{� �^ � �'�� i �` ■:. INr7 rr"- • ■n • 3 SO mm � a _ � �.f/,■ � fit!; r -ion -- x.11/ ;'�•' WIN� a■■� ��� ;. mss■■ �� _ �� Point wm--m Mason on CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION FURTHERING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "A" AND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED. (Walnut Street) ZCA 14-86 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tigard held a public hearing on September 22, 1986, to consider the annexation of Walnut Street right-of--way; and WHEREAS, ORS 199.490(1)(a) gives the governing body the authority to proceed with a minor boundary change by adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has determined that the annexation of the Walnut Street right--of-way is in the best interest of the citizens of Tigard; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation is in accordance with ORS 490 and constitutes a "minor boundary change" under Boundary Commission Law 1299.410 to 199.510. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1: The Council hereby approves the proposed annexation and requests the Commission to approve it and effect it as soon as possible. Section 2: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified copies of the resolution with the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commissin at once. PASSED: This _ day of 1986. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: Acting City Recorder - City of Tigard /br129 RESOLUTION No. 86-- ,I fin...... fir...... ■ ._� • �� i!t'��� n � �� fI■aaitfA :w. rte" ■ � E, �r �1 in In 40 101 awe IN LVI NONE mill m milli ON Nis mommorm MM am via in 0 was NO mogave in � . � = Intel MM ► SW Walnut Street Those portions of SW Walnut Street (County Roads 934, A-55, and 494) in Section 4, T2S, R1W, and Section 3, T2S, R1W, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Parcel 1 Beginning at the NE corner of the SE quarter of the NW quarter of said Section 4; thence North 89033" East 20 feet to the northerly right--of-way line of SW Walnut Street (County Road 934); thence on said right-of-way line and the existing city limits of the City of Tigard, southerly and easterly 1,580 feet, more or lass to the point of intersection with the West line of that tract conveyed to Conrad J. and Hazel A. Selliken by deed recorded in Book 464, Page 444, Washington County Deed Records; thence on said northerly right-of-way line, easterly approximately 400 feet to the southerly extension of the West line of Lot 42, Bellwood, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence on said southerly extension 20 feet to the centerline of said County Road 934; thence easterly, on said centerline, 120 feet, more or leas, to an angle point in the existing city limits of the City of Tigard; thence southerly on said city limits 20 feet to the South of right-of-way line of SW Walnut Street (County Road 934); thence leaving said city limits and on said South right-of-way line westerly and northerly 2,130 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Lot 6, OBRS Heights, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records, and the existing city limit of the City of Tigard; thence easterly on said city limit, 20 feat to the point of beginning, containing approximately 1.8; acres. Parcel II Beginning at the Initial Point of Curl Acres, a recorded plat, Washington County Pitt Records; thence northerly, on the East line of said Section 4, 11.34 feet; thence westerly on the South right-of-way line of said County Road 934, 690 feet, more or less, to the West line of the tract conveyed to Kenneth Olson, at ux, by deed recorded in Book 411, Page 506, Washington County Plat records; thence northerly, on the extension of said West line and the existing city limits of the City of Tigard, 20 feet to the centerline of said County Road 934; thence easterly, on said centerline and said existing city limits, approximately 890 feet to the intersection with the northerly extension of the West line of Lot 1, Block 2, said Curl Acres; thence southerly on said extension 34 feet, more or less, to the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence southwesterly, on the South right-of--way line of SW Walnut Street (County Road A-55) 201.02 feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately 0.45 acres. Parcel III Beginning on the centerline of SW Walnut Street (County Road A-55), at its intersection with the northerly extension of the east line of Lot 5, Block 2, Curl Acres, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence northeasterly, on said centerline and the existing city limits of the City of Tigard, approximately 540 feet to the intersection with the southerly extension of the East right-of-way line of SW 122nd Avenue; thence northerly on said extension approximately 24.5 feet to the North right-of--way line of said County Road A-55; thence easterly on said North right-of-way line v r T, approximately 2,040 feet to the intersection with the West line of the John H. Hicklin DLC 37; thence easterly on the North right-of-way line of SW Walnut c` Street (County Road 494) approximately 260 feet to the West boundary line of { that tract of land conveyed to L.L., Lorraine C., Oscar, and Elsie V. Payne by deed recorded in Book 868, Pages 969, 971, 973, and 975, Washington County Deed Records; thence southerly on said West boundary line and the existing city limits of the City of Tigard 20 feet to a point of intersection with the centerline of said County Road 494; thence easterly on said centerline approximately 1,440 feet to a point of intersection with the northerly extension of the West right-of-way line of SW Fonner Street (County Road 495); thence southerly on said extension20 feet to the South right-of-way line of SW Walnut Street (County Road 494); thence westerly on said South right-of--way line approximately 1,670 feet to point of intersection with the West line of the John H. Hicklin DLC 37; thence westerly on the South right-of-way line of SW Walnut Street (County Road A-55) approximately 2,630 feet to the northerly extension of the East line of said Lot 5, Block 2, Curl Acres; thence northerly on said extension approximately 22.5 feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately 3.04 acres. mj13 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM September 22, 1986 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TIGARD CITY HALL - 'TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL. BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: ZCA 14-86 Zone Change Annexation REQUEST: To annex the Walnut Street right-of-quay from SW Tiedeman to SW 135th. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: SW Walnut Street is designated as a major collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: Public Right-of-Way 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: SW Walnut Street between SW Tiedeman and SW 135th. (WCTM 2S1 3AA, 2S1 3AB, 2S1 3AC, 2S1 380, 2S1 38A, 2S1 3BB, 2S1 38C, 2S1 9AD, 2S1 9A, 2S1 48D.) 3 2. Background Information In order to more effectively plan for an allow construction of future improvements to the transportation system in the Walnut Street/121st Avenue neighborhood, the Walnut Street right--of-way should be within the Tigard City limits. As this large residential area develops to urban densities, it is important that the transportation system be improved to accomodate the growth. 3. Vicinity Information SW Walnut Street is a major route connecting northwest Tigard with Pacific Highway. The land on both sides of Walnut is developed as primarily low density residential with some multi-family development and some vacant parcels. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description SW Walnut is designated as a major collector on the City's Comprehensive Plan Map. Currently, the right-of-way varies from 40 to 50 feet in width. There is a narrow asphalt path separated from the road pavement on the north side of Walnut from Fowler Junior High School to SW 121st. There is a bikepath which is separated from the vehicular traffic lanes with buttons on the north side of SW Walnut from SW 122nd to SW 128th. There are two feet travel lanes with minimal shoulders. 'f STAFF REPORT - ZCA 14-86 (SW Walnut Street Right-of-Way - Page 1 . r 5. Agency and NPO Comments t` No written comments had been received at the writing of this report. 8, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1 and 10.1.2 and Chapter 18,136 of the Community Development Code. The Planning staff has determined that the proposal as submitted is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: a. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. b. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the Police Department has been notified and the land is located within Tigard's Urban Planning Area. The Planning Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: A. Chapter 18.136 is met because the applicant has met all of the approval standards. C. RECONM9ENDATION Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning Staff recommends approval of ZCA 14-86 subject to the following conditions: 1. The City of Tigard Police Department shall comment on the proposal. t PREPARED BY: ElifaUth A. Newton APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director, Community Development .: (br128) r STAFF REPORT - ZCA-14-86 (SW Walnut Street Right-of-{play) - PAGE 2 4 �o2'� 1966 7—e-9-,e 7,e— u r .«- CIA— �l t's�zc� S .L3friN9 '7�G'1 �f/ Miff / /-' �'rsS,4-C / .............. �� - - G 2v_�7v-7 s CITY OF TIGARD OREGON ((( SUMMARY .' AGENDA OF: September 22, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 11, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 121st Avenue PREVIOUS ACTION: None Right--of-Wav Annexation ZCA 13-86 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Ann Newton DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Community Development POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council forward an annexation request to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission to annex the portions of the SW 121st right-of-way from Rose Vista Drive to Walnut Street which are not within the City limits. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City staff has received numerous calls regarding the transportation system in the Walnut/121st Avenue neighborhood. In order to more effectively provide transportation services and plan future improvements, City staff would like to annex the SW 121st right-of-way at the present time. Attached is a resolution to forward the proposal to the Boundary Commission. µ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached resolution to forward the annwxation proposal to the Boundary Commission. Y' 2. Deny the proposal. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached resolution to forward the annexation proposal to the Boundary Commission. (br128) k zl us rr a - IN WhOw ow vow ME ' minis •off �� ® few ft lk Un •� �,� r'���• �: ✓•� in � r ���/I:Ir�/■ � I � 1 s �s=� i �� '' ►�• � /f „ mss—s loop . gas all .83 W—WA INS So ARM dt smalls u Army OF walls im snow 27 ME L see MIEN *� +.� VA - � - was Vasa MOM ®®® ►� - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION FURTHERING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "fl" AND DESCRIBED EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED. (1213t Avenue) ZCA 18-86. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tigard held a public hearing on September 22, 1986, to consider the annexation of 121st Avenue right-of-w.Ay; and WHEREAS, ORS 199.490(1)(a) gives the governing body the authority to proceed with a minor boundary change by adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has detlarr..ined that the annexation of the 121st Avenue right-of-way is in the best interest of the citizens of Tigard; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation is in accordance with ORS 490 and constitutes a "minor boundary change" under Boundary Commission Law 199.410 to 199.510. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section l: The Council hereby approves the proposed annexation and requests the Boundary Commission to approve it and effect it as soon as possible. Section 2. The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified copies of the resolution with the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission at once. PASSED: This day of 1986. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: Zq Acting City Recorder - City of Tigard (br128) :.`, RESOLUTION NO. 86- Sol 5 now". 0 ■ .=mora±/� �■�iI�IL■1�I1 S.W. 121st Avenue Those portions of S.W. 1213t Avenue (County Roads 1992, 358, and 411) located in Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County; Oregon, described as follows: Parcel I Beginning at a point on the centerline of S.W. 1213t Avenue (County Road 1992) which bears North 07018' East, 109 feet from the intersection of said centerline with the centerline of S.W. Walnut Street (County Road A-55), said paint of beginning being on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard;, thence North 87039'We3t, on said city limit, approximately 25 feet to the West right-of-way line of said S.W. 121st Avenue; thence, southerly, leaving said city limit and on said West right-of-way, approximately 3,020 feet to the southerly line of that tract of lana described in Book 283, Page 505, Washington County Deed Records (also being the existing city limit of the City of Tigard); thence, on said city limit. South 76042' East approximately 20 feet to the centerline of S.W. 121st Avenue (County Road 411); thence, on said centerline and said city limit North 29030' East approximately 180 feet to an angle point in said city limit; thence. South 67025' East on said city limit approximately 25 feet to the easterly right-of-way line of said S.W. 121st Avenue; thence, leaving said city limit, northerly on said easterly right-of-way approximately 2,900 feet to the existing city limit of the City of Tigard; thence, South 86022'10" West on said city limit approximately 25 feet to the centerline of S.W. 121st Avenue (County Road 1992); thence, South 07018' West on said centerline approximately 13 feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately 3.4 acres. Parcel II Beginning at a point on the West right-of-way line of S.W. 121st Avenue (County Road 411) said point of beginning being approximately 528 feet North of the South line of said Section 3, and also being on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard; thence, northerly on said West right-of-way, leaving said city limit, approximately 151 feet to an angle point on said right-of-way line; thence, North 290 East on the westerly right--of-way line of said S.W. 121st Avenue approximately 250 feet to the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, also being the South line of that tract of land described in Book 730, Page 630, Washington County Deed Records; thence, South 830 East on said South line and said city limit approximately 22 feet to the centerline of County Road 411; thence, North 290 East on said centerline and said city limit approximately 230 feet; thence, leaving said centerline on said existing city limit, South 68026' East approximately 20 feet to the easterly right-of-way line, of said County Road 411; thence, leaving said city limit and on said easterly right-of-way line, South 290 West approximately 480 feet to an angle point thereon; thence, southerly on the East right-of-way line of S.W. 121st Avenue (County Road 411) approximately 150 feet to a point which is 528 feet north of the South line of said Section 3; thence, westerly approximately 45 feet to a point of beginning, containing approximately 0.48 acres. STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: ZCA 13-86 Zone Change Annexation REQUEST: To annex the 121st right-of-way from SW Rose Vista Drive to Sw Walnut. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: 121st Avenue is designated as a major collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: Public Right-of--lay 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: The portion of SW 121st under consideration is located between SW Walnut and SW Rose Vista Drive. (WCTM 2S1 3CC, 2S1 3CD, 2S1 3CB). ff 2. Background Information l� With the increased development in northwest Tigard, City staff has received numerous calls regarding the transportation system in the Walnut Street/121st Avenue neighborhood. In order to more effectively provide transportation services and plan future improvements, City staff would like to annex the SW 121st right-of-way from SW Rose Vista Drive to SW Walnut Street. 3. Vicinity Information SW 121st Avenue bisects a low density residential area. The street serves as a primary access for traffic to Scholls Ferry Road and to SW Pacific Hwy. via Walnut or Gaarde. Most of the land abutting SW 121st is developed as low density residential, although there are a few large vacant parcels. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description SW 121st Avenue is designated as a major collector on the City's Comprehensive Plan Map. The right-of-way varies from 40 to 55 feet in width. There are two 12 feet travel lanes and no shoulder on either side. STAFF REPORT - ZCA 13-86 (121st Ave. Right-of-way - PAGE 1 5. Agency and NPO Comments No written comments had been received at the writing of this report. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1 and 10.1.2 and Chapter 18.136 of the Community Development Code. The Planning staff has determined that the proposal as submitted is consistent with tha relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: a. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. b. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the Police Department has been notified and the land is located within Tigard's Urban Planning Area. The Planning Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: *_ a. Chapter 18.136 is met because the applicant has met all of the -= approval standards. -;f C. RECOMMENDATION 4 Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning Staff recommends approval of ZCA 13-86 subject to the following conditions: 1. The City of Tigard Police Department shall comment on the proposal. PREPARED BY:JElizabet% A. Newton 40WED BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director, Community Development (br128) �u STAFF REPORT - ZCA 13-86 (1213t Ave. Right-of-Way) —PAGE 2 ,,,. a,..a.��.� _. ... .mow.:..,�.,._�.•.<ti. _ �... . .... ... ..��;�.. ^..1 Y CITY ©F W _ . &PAI ` A t,� fov AG -� (` 1C_Tiyt z slyC �� J $1-3 C D, s/-3 C ' w Om � x y i t 4 �"''� �'.'ti�.:-�.,"`h'�'�.....�ro. �+« .� °--nom..-a: .,.�. -f-.. --«a �.. � f - r� ,�< ��?"""'r s 'r• ��..-h."�n -. QOLC 97A 2 E AL a�• SEP 22 1986 .�, y i vzor V _ s 4!�''.Q tt Q g�NNtNG DEPS!' �7 f t City of Tigard V � ir Planning Department 13125 S.W.Hall Blvd. 1 k, 188 Tigard,Oregon 97223 SEP 9September 15,91986 SubjectsThe annexation of S.W.121st Ave. LkNOF P�AN►NG DEP DEPT. I an opposed to the annexation of 121st Ave. from Hose Vista Drive north to the current City limits of Tigard,Oregon. I have so desirsto be in the city limits of Tigard Oregon. I would like this letter to be put on record in opposition of the ansaxatione Georgia Reed 12795 S.W.121st Ave. Tigard,Oregon 97223 S (` City of Tigard planain Department 13125 S.W.Hall Blvd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 SEP IS 1966 CITY OF TIGAnD PLANNING DEPT. I M writing this letter in opposition of the annexation of S.W.121st Ave.fron Rose Vista Drive north to the current City Limits of Tigard,Oregon. I de not want aqy property annexed to the City of Tigard. Iwould lilts this letter to be put on record in opposition of the annexation. obs Reed 12795 S.W.121st Ave. Tigard,oregon 97223 �4. �^{ INC. 5 ° el 7.1 �F �i7Y��f� +�' n^f+r�" �� f�� �V 'r'�r�s � 4�"L�„'.�i�.yi•/� � . r L • .: ..... � `"�' t�,�.rfra. ..W3. ,:amu. t:,��,�w� �-x �r��,�-� y _ �. s z 3::. �a i � , ( City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 BE: PUMZC HEARING TESTIMONY File #ZCA 13-86 Request: To annex the 121st Avenue right-of-way from SW Rose Vista Drive north to the current city limits. Reason: To give the City of Tigard the right to maintain said right- of-way. (as stated to me by the Planning Dept of the City). Contentions This is not the true reason for the request. It would not be a fiscally sound practice for the City to obligate City money When County funds are available. Eben during very economically hard times, the County has provided excellent maintainence of this right-of"may. Conclusion: If said right-of-way were annexed, it would be widened to absorb some of the traffic flow from Pacific Highway. This could be an advantage to the business interest of the City. It certainly would be a dangerous situation for the residents on and off 121st Avenue. The danger would be not only to drivers of automobiles, but more importantly to all the children of the area.. Please keep in mind that there are three schools in the vicinity - Mary Woodward. - Fowler - Charles P. Council Members: Do not act on this request until you are confident that you are knowledgeable of ALL the motives and consequences. Sandra T. Smith 12880 SW 121st 6_- Tigard, Oregon 97223 rro September 20, 1986 , I 4 Tigard City Council City of Tigard 13125 SW Hail Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Council Members, Thank you for your notification to the people of SW Fanner Street, SW Walnut Street, and SW 121st individual land owners of the streets of your request to Annex Street right-of-ways to the City of Tigard in the area of NPO 0 3. However, I request you table your Request as the Neighborhood Planning Organization #3 (NPO *3-Citizen Involvement), has not been notified to call a Meeting of the property owners of the areas. The People of these Areas need a chance to #LL get together at a HPO #3 Meeting so they can discuss their options and the future possible Impact to them such as: additional out lay of dollars for Road LID (Local Improvement District), the possible annexation of their property to the City of Tigard because of creating certian islands in the area, the possibility of formation of a "County Service District" at a set dollar amount of 074. 00 per household or $. 58 per $1, 000. of property value per year, or to eliviate the county and city responsibility to maintain the road by the possibility of the people on SW Fanner for example, to personally contract and pay for a private road cor:ractor to repair the road and other damages, and the pros and cons of belonging to the City by having portions of the State and County taxation funds that are returned to the City for part road maintenance. As a member of NPO #3 and a resident of SW Fanner Street, I request that a knowledgeable person of the City of Tigard Administration Staff attend the meeting and give the people of SW Fanner Street, SW Walnut Street, and SW 121st area to give the City of Tigard's view for road maintenance cost to be paid by the county, city, or property owners, when would the road maintenance program begin if annexed by the city, evaluation of the projected future of the roads and properties of the area, would the properties be automatically annexed to the City of Tigard or would annexation only be available generally upon request and how could the City Guarantee that statement, would their be a Storm Drain Sur-Charge to the property owners, what are the legal ramification if the people of SW Fanner or other street jurisdictions were to employ a private contractor to maintian the roads. Your immediate response would be appreciated. Si arel , .Lou Ane Mortense 11160 SW Fanner, *' Tigard, OR 97223 I M P O R T A N T R E M I N D E R N O T I C E City of Tigard Council Meeting September 22 1986 at 6:30PM at Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard. OR. ' -REASON: City of Tigard request to ANNEX SW Fanner Street right-of-way between SW Walnut & SW 121st Ave. If you have not been notified of this Annexation of SW Fanner Street to the City of Tigard, there is a Hearing by The City of Tigard requesting the following streets be ANNEXED into their ,jurisdiction: SW Fanner, SW Schools Ferry Road, SW Walnut, & SW 121st Avenue. The annexation of SW Fanner was spurred by a Neighborhood Meeting May 1, 1986 at Charles F. Tigard by the residence of SW Pathfinder and SW 111th Place because of SW Fanner Road's poor condition. It is Washington County's position because of lack of funds they are not interested in maintaining any right-of-ways or local (minor) collector streets and would like to turn any of these streets over to the local jurisdiction of that area. The City of Tigard has agreed to maintain such streets at their present condition. However, you should be aware that if the street is considered not maintainable and the City can no longer continue to afford to maintain the street, the City of Tigard will try to encourage the people of the street to form and contribute to a LID (Local Improvement District). In most cases the street would be required to be developed to the standards of the City's requirements such as widening, installation of storm drain tile, and possibly sidewalks which are very costly to the property owner. There is still another possible alternative which is in the planning stages by Washington County that is a "County Service District" which would require voter approval and would take up to a year to get on the Ballot. The possible cost would be 5. 58 per 51, 000. of property value for Urban Growth Property Owners which we are presently or a Standard Rate "f S74.00 per household annually, whtchever is selected by vote for that district. (From Tigard Times 8/7-13, 1986 in part. ) A third possibility is that all of the property owner on SW Fanner would form their own road maintaince assocation and hire a private contractor to repair the road and other damages. For examples the Tigard Times 8/7-13 1986, wrote (in part) that 28 property owners pooled their resources, obtained a permit from the county and had the potholes and other damages reparied infront of their homes. For 3 miles of road and 14 tons of material, which filled potholes and repaired inside curves on Holly Hill Road south of Hillsboro it cost 9975. or approximately $40. per property owner. Metro Paving Inc. of Aloha did the work. This appears to be more equitable and also less expensive than "County Service District", or even possible property annexation to the City of Tigard at 91. 88/thousand of property value. I hope this information is helpful to you and that you plan to express in vritting and voice your opinion as to whether the City of Tigard should ANNEX SW Fanner Street into their jurisdiction. ° ,Lou Ane Mortensen _A Concerned property owner on SW Fanner & Member of NFO #3 Neighborhood Planning Organization of The City of Tigard CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 22, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: 9/15/86 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CU 3-86 PREVIOUS ACTION: Hearings Officer Tri-Met Transit Center approved August 28 1986 PREPARED BY: Planning Staff = DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Citv Council POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached for your review is the Transcript from the August 14th, and August 27th Hearings Officer public hearing, the notice of final order, Hearings Officer final order, staff report, letter from Tri-Met, Kittelson & Associates traffic study, and applicant's narrative information. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. uphold Hearing's Officer approval. 2. Modify the conditions of approval. 3. Reverse the Hearings Officer's approval. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Review information submitted and make a decision. 164/dj M . :ter ,�� . - ,. ... TRANSCRIPT - TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITIONAL. USE CU 3-86 TRI-MET TRANSIT CENTER 8960 SW Commercial Street NOTE: August 14th hearing did not have use of records recorder was ng system. Tape placed to pick up public testimony. Hearings Officer is difficult to hear. BETH MASON, Hearings Officer, "This is August 14th, 1986, at 7:00 PM. We're in the Town Hall for the City of Tigard. This is the time and place set for the regular agenda of the Hearings Officer. My name is Beth Mason, I'm the Hearings Officer for the City. Immediately to my left is Keith Liden, the Planning staff representative. We have two items on the agenda these evening, we' ll take them in the order in which they appear, First item is Conditional Use 3-86. It's an application by Tri-Met for construction of an off street transit center in the Central Business District. For those of you who have been at these hearings or who have not been at these hearings, I'll have hearings procedure that ow We'll be following ng. . . . . . . . . . . thank you . . . I believe its on the table, there, by the microphone, its blue, I encourage you to take a look at that. . , Why don't you change my name change my address and terox a few more. Alright. Essentially what we will do is we'll go thru the staff report. I'll hear, there is an opportunity for questions about the project and those wishing to speak in favor of it and those wishing to speak in opposition and rebuttal by each side. I'll state for the record that I've had no exparte contact with anyone regarding this application, that means that I have not talked with anyone else outside of this hearing room, however, I would consider any objections to my hearing this matter. Does anyone object to my hearing this matter? Okay, I see none." Keith Liden, Senior Planner, "Okay, this first Triitem is a Conditional Use for Tri--Met to put in a bus transit center on Commercial Street. It is a Conditional Use. Staff has reviewed the proposal and we are recommending approval, subject to a number of conditions. We feel we have some, or the TRANSCRIPT _CU 3-86 TRI-MET PAGE 1 r> Engineering staff did have some concern about the arrangement of the buses and the parking on the street. Randy Clarno from our Engineering Division is here and he has a couple of recommended amendments to the conditions of approval. We discussed this item with Tri-{Flet this morning, tried to go over some of the details on, uh, so I guess if Randy will just indicate what changes. I guess if you get anywhere close to the stuff there." Randy Clarno, Engineering Services Manager, "Okay, we're recommending modifications to conditions number two and three. On the fourth line down on condition two, where it says in parathesis 40 feet new curb to existing curb, we would like to add the word "minimum" after, uh, second curb there, so it would read "40 feet new curb to existing curb minimum". On condition number three we would like to change the wording there, its a little lengthy. I could give you a copy when we get done here. We're recommending that it read. "Bus parking within 36 feet of the curb on the opposite side of Commercial street shall not be permitted. Applicant shall provide the Engineering Division with a three lane street marking plan from !lain Street to applicant's southerly boundary, if bus parking will be between 36 and 40 feet of the curb on the opposite side of Commercial Street. The purpose for that is to maintain a minimum three lane street configuration on Commercial Street and that can be done with 36 feet as opposed to 40." Beth Mason, "I'll need that . . . . . . . Randy Clarno, "Okay." Beth Mason, "Alright. . . . . . . . ." Keith Liden, "Thais all I have, Joe Walsh from Tri-Met is here and he can explain the proposal . . . . . ." "My name is Joe Walsh, I'm a project planner at Tri-Met, our address is 4012 SE 17th, Portland, 97202 and I have, I will make my presentation very brief. We've reviewed the staff report, met with staff this morning, are in agreement with the changed conditions just proposed. I might take just a minute to explain briefly what we're. What we're proposing and how we're proposing it works. The facility we're proposing is a, essentially we're calling it a transit center, its main function, that it performs is as a TRANSCRIPT CU 3-86 TRI-MET PAGE 2 a' transfer site for the all the buses which serve the Tigard area. This will allow us to bring all of the lines that operate in and around Tigard together on one site, to facilitate transfer activities. Right now the bus lines that serve Tigard are not coordinated as far as there schedules, so its somewhat hap-hazzard to make the transfer. We've been looking for a site to do this in Tigard for the last five years. In fact have been granted a conditional use at this site previously. The deal fell throught, since have purchased the site and have construction funding in hand. We would like to start construction this fall . In terms of the actual operation and the things that we' ll have on the site. Starting over here, the Greyhound station and the barber shop or any subsequent use in that space, the barbur shops, now occupies, will stay. We're going to make some improvements to that building. It will have its own seperate access and parking. In terms of the transit center site, we' ll be building three bays where the buses park. All one way operation on the site. The ones that come into the site, will be making right turns and left turns here at the northern most driveway. parking at these two islands where the patrons cans transfer or drop off, whatever. Exits will be here at the, the southwest side of the site, buses exiting . . . . . left turns and right turns. Greyhound will stay on the site. The Greyhound buses will occupy this portion of the site right here, when there on site. Uh, Its not a r park and ride. There's no parking other than two auto drop off spaces, provided. The features that will be included in the development, some of them are shown here, there's going to be substantial amount of covered area. Number one to provide weather protection for the patrons. Number two, in combination with some kind of special paving, treated concrete, bominite, something like that, we' ll be, the effect will be channel pedestrian activity on the site so that we don't have pedestrians scurring back and forth in the bus operation area. There will be a number of other amenties, telephones, trash cans, such, we have'nt got to the point of specifying exactly what and where, but those are standard at a site like this. We' ll be, we'll be providing bicycle parking, as proposed in the staff report. We don't have details on exactly what its going to be. It may be enclosed, lockable lockers, if we can find some kind of operation arrangement. If we can find someone in Tigard, perhaps, the Greyhound concessionair could operate is for US. That's all we have. We've met all the landscaping requirements and 1 provide street trees. Although those details, of course will be worked out on a site plan to be approved by staff. That's really all I have. Are there any questions?" TRANSCRIPT CU 3-86 TRI-INET PAGE 3 Beth Mason, "Okay. Are there any questions of either staff or the applicant? Yes?" Unknown, "I have a question. Will this eliminate the . . . . . . stop right in front of the post office? There seems to be a traffic hazzard when the busses park there." Walsh, "Those stops on Main Street will be eliminated and everything will move up here." Geraldine Ball, "You mean the ones that are up near SW Pacific " Walsh, "No, no. No just the two in the vicinity of Main and Commercial." "I have a questions, Craig Helmer. Your attempting to, your going to come in bascially off of Main Street, turn into this uh, parking area, and then your going to there again come out on the right side of your plan, to the south basically, and then your going to try and make a turn onto Commercial Street and go back out onto Main or are you going down to Hall." Walsh, "Both. We'll have about 220 bus movement through here a day. About a hundred of them will make that left turn and we worked the, the radius of the, maybe thats the question thats coming. Thats how does that radius work. Thats been a real concern to us. We've had to move this island back much further than we would have liked to to allow the bus to make that turn. We're also working with Southern Pacific, hoping to acquire additional 25 feet of there unused right-of-way, all the way along the site, that will allow a number of things. That will allow us to move the buses even further back from the centerline. It'll give us the full distance that would allow for a three lane continuous turn type treatment on Commercial Street, give us somemore room, particuliar on this island, and we could move this back a little further to give us." Helmer, "Your going to bend your articulated buses around that corner along that street." TRANSCRIPT CU 3-86 TRI-MET PAGE 4 _ z Walsh, "Actually the artics have the best turning radius of any of the buses by a considerable amount." Helmer, "I have a question of staff, uh, possibly. Across the street from this is of course the old Girod's, uh Tradewell, or whatever the hell its called now. There is some exiting from that parking lot and across from, almost right across from where there entering here and theses another exit, in fact theres two exits down in this general area." Walsh, "There's one right about there." Helmer, "Uh, with the size of that street as it now, uh, plus the corner, uh, its just plain tuff to get out of there, with that street. Unless you eliminate all the parking on that side. The east side, There's an office building just slightly to the south of that exit that exit on there. Its, I would object to having it made a turn to the left to come back onto Main Street. Because I don't think, thats going to be a real problem up there and your going to have a real bottle neck at the corner with the traffic, unless your going to put a light in." Keith Liden, "Randy, do you have any response . . . . . . parking . . . traffic light." Randy Clarno, "I don't anticipate, anticiapte any problems with the route itself. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . they can get out. The third lane is the width are sufficient enough to allow for proper . . . . . . . buses through there. The concern of the off street parking on the east side, is uh, we have noted that and in addition to Commercial Street, or any other collector . . . . right now, . . . . parking, off street parking to . . . . . . . . . . . Helmer, Now about the intersection of Commercial and Main Street. I do banking at Washington Federal, my office is on Burnham Street and at different times of the day, . . . . . . . . . high traffic times, anywhere from 3:00 o'clock on. Its very difficult to get out, to either cross over going basically west onto Main Street, or even making a right turn heading up towards Pacific Highway. There is a real bottleneck there. Your running these many buses TRANSCRIPT CU 3-86 TRT—MET PAGE 5 through there and coming back on there, your going to create quite a traffic problem there, cuz its, the traffic slows and we have the railroad tracks there to contend with there. There is a ocassional train comes through now. Not as many as there use to be. But there is a real problem. I think that there is a concern there." Walsh, "In terms of the number of buses that run, actual number at any given hour is not that much. 220 a day is not " Helmer, "But at the peak hours your going to have a lot more buses there. We, are the people going to, where are they going. If this is going to be a bus stop, where are they going to park. You don't have any on site parking." Walsh, "No, its not a park and ride, that was a conscious decision." Helmer, "Your not going to take any passagers on, they have to walk down the street to take, . . . . or park basically down in this general area." Walsh, "Well I think, with, just from my observations right now, theres some in that commercial street corridor, theres some of that that goes on. I don't know if its either car pooling or, uh, people using it as a informal park and ride right now. I don't think thats going to change. There's a level of service that we are providing to stay exacatly the same." Gerldine Ball, "Well I can tell you that where the people park to ride in buses is Girods empty grocery store." Walsh, "Right, thats what I'm saying. There there next door." Geraldine Ball, "Then they park at Payless and Albertsons. They've been very kind in letting people park there. They have a whole line, I know I park there all the time, thats how I'm familiar with it and Thriftway and Fred Meyer won't allow you, but, Albertsons' and Payless have, however, its very possible that Albertons' might be moving in a couple of years and we neer! parking. But I understand that Tri-Met has looked for a place up on 72nd. (Walsh, "Right.") Then that would take a lot of the people off of down dawn." TRANSCRIPT CU 3-86 TRI-MET PAGE 6 Walsh, "Two reasons we didn't want to, actually three reasons we didn't want to locate the park and ride here. One, is just is terms of that kind of a use of the downtown area, that we didn't want to just provide a big parking lot. If we were to do a park and ride it would need to be, joining this. The other two properties that are available down there have even higher proportion of there value on building and we didn't want to purchase either one of those sites to knock down, effectively, a new building. The one here had limited life. So . . . . . . . . . with that. . . . . . take that into consideration. The third thing is, as far as locating a park and ride we would much perfer it to be adjacent to and visible from the main arterial. So if we can get something of Pacific Highway, that will be a better situation for us. It' ll, there will be less traffic on these collector type streets than in the downtown and will be more visible to the people who might want to use it." Helmer, "How many buses are you going to have gathered there, say from four to six o'clock. How many, how many total buses will come into that?" Walsh, "I would have to look up to give you the exact number, but, we have about, uh, five to six trunk line buses an hour. There wouldn't be, in the ` peak hour, there wouldn't be, the peak two hours, there would probley be ten trunk line buses. Six truss town buses, and two local buses, so that would be 18 buses." Helmer, "In a two hour period. . . . . . . . . . either eight o'clock in the morning or six." Walsh, "No, the 4:30 — 5:30 hour we have much more service than comparable morning time. Uh, the other thing that we have, we have built this for four lines. And come september there will only be three lines serving the Washington Square, Tigard line, number 43 is cut. Its expectation is that there will be another local route established out here at such time as we are able to reorganize our westside service and afford somemore service again. So we're building it for eight buses, it will only be six buses meeting here at any given time. At most times it would only be four buses meeting. When the trunk line and the cross town and 77 meet and then once an hour there' ll be � six. TRANSCRIPT CU 3-06 TRI-MET PAGE 7 Beth Mason, "Randy, I didn't hear what your answer on your evaluation of the east turning movements on the traffic flow on main?" Randy Clarno, "I just mentioned that the direction, or the pointing of the buses as they come to the approach to cross the street is adequate enough to, there on site considerations, adequate enough for buses to make proper left turn movements." Beth Mason, "Thats. . . . . . thats a physical characteristics, that means that, you know that there enough room for the buses to turn. I'm asking about the impact that turning movements will have on the traffic thats already on Commercial. . . . . . . objections he raised. Randy Clarno, "I guess maybe I don't understand the question. But, Beth Mason, "Randy if your making the turn out of that lot onto an empty street, then you can talk to me about turning radius and it makes some sense. But if your making that turn and your fighting the existing traffic that$ going by in both directions from that, by that driveway, you have had the issue can you physically get the bus around the turn, but how do you interrupt that flow of that traffic and what does it do to that traffic while the buses make turns. Left or right." Randy Clarno, "I think that speeds are low enough that there, you know, you wouldn't have the conflicts or knowing whether you would have any other, say a local street or even a collector street thats in the business district, I don't think that speeds are high enough, theres enough visibility, the site distance is proper is proper . . . . . . . .several people talking. . . Walsh, "I would like to interject one thing. We did take some traffic counts out there, and for the hazzards for the, we took three weekday traffic counts. Evening and morning peak, and the average for those in the evening peak, which was the highest, uh, by considerable amount, was above 240 per hour, Mich is significant, but its not not a steady stream of traffic. In other words there are breaks in traffic, traffic coming uphill is not going very fast, its just made a corner. The traffic going downhill is slowing for the stop sign, so the traffic is slow and there are significant gaps." TRANSCRIPT CU 3-86 TRI-MET PAGE 8 Helmer, "What about the traffic on Main Street. As I, I don't really have that much problem with, with Commercial, because you can heard that bus out there, stop . . . . . . . One way or another. But on Commercial, how about the flow of traffic on Commercial or on Main Street rather around that time. You must have some count on that. Your the City Engineer." Randy Clarno, "No I'm not the City Engineer, but Helmer. "Oh, well I know that theres been some count there, but its been quite a while back, cuz I don't Randy Clarno, "We're under contract right now with consultants to do not only counts on Main Street but man hours for paving, traffic movements, and parking, considerations for parking." Walsh, "The thing to remember I guess about Main Street is that we've already got that 60 percent of the service that will be on this site is already . . . . . . Helmer, "But your driving, but basically your driving through, your not turning, your not stopped at Commercial." Walsh, "Where stopped at Commercial and Main. Most, those are stops those are Helmer, "Right, but your not, your not hurting the rest, some of those other buses that go basically up Main Street and onto Pacific Highway and visaversa, you know, I mean, I think my Walsh, "We're bringing, we're bringing ten buses an hour in that peak." Helmer, "Down Commercial Street? Down?" Walsh, "New buses, with this Helmer, "Your adding ten more down Commercial with this . . . . . (Walsh, "Right.") Well, sitting out here, basically by the clock .and attempting, especially to make a left turn. Your going to be holding up slot of traffic.. Your going to be sitting there a long time in order to get out there and cross. Thats my concern." TRANSCRIPT CU 3-86 'TRI-MET PAGE 9 a g Walsh, "Built into the schedules for the cross town and the local right now are scheduling people who are familiar with those kinds of bottlenecks. Does'nt seem to have a problem with, they can build in traffic . . . . . . here and I don't know what else . . . . . We're talking about a similar new facility like this in Beaverton. So there was some concern about what the travel time would be or could be, the transfer be made both at Beaverton and here." Helmer, "This is basically like the one you have here on the, right on the railroad tracks." Walsh, ". . . . smaller. And we have to move that " Helmer, "But your not turning see, your coming basically straight through and I think thats where, what I have a problem. If your going straight out or something. When you start making turns and your going to have, bascially have to Main, and your trying to go left, uh, theres going to bra some problems, because the traffic is quite heavy there. I mean, the post office draws a hack of a lot of people at that time. You've got the bank up the next block on the corner and then of course you have the light there fluxuates and so _ forth, but still theres still a tremendous amount of traffic and I've been here for twenty years and I've seen it build up. And I think thats where I would have the problem. But." Walsh, "I guess the only thing that I would offer is in terms of those volumes and congestion, that I don't think those, they may affect us but I don't think that those ten additional buses in an hour are going to somehow put it up over an unacceptable limit. If its at a place now where it needs a traffic signal, uh, Helmer, "I think you need a steady, okay excuse me." Both Mason, "Where getting out of hand here. I've think we have been through the questions. Did you have something you wanted to add." Mrs. Sall, "I just have one suggestion, and that is the cross walk is right where you make the turn and, (Unknown, "Crosswalk on Commercial") On Main, TRANSCRIPT CU 3--86 TRI-MET PAGE 10 and I think something either should be changed or something, so people are trying to beat across, on the cross walk. They need to, the City could put the cross walk in a different location. It isn't in the very very best spot right now, if your buses are going to be coming around both ways." Beth Mason, "Okay, Lets kind of bring this back to a more formal hearing process. Is there anyone else wishing to speak in favor of this application. Is there anything you want to add, I guess, in opposition. Helmer, "Yes, I. I Mason, "I need for your to come forward and identify yourself and sign in. Helmer, "I've signed in." Mason, "Alright." Helmer, "My name is Craig Helmer, I live at 10411 SW 52nd. I own property on Burnham Street approximately right behind this property, plus some property down on Tigard Avenue. I feel that before you would issue any kind of a '• permit that we should have a study of the traffic flow on Main, a current study, to see how this is going to affect the buses coming out onto Main and turning left or right during the peak hours. Not something that is taken during the middle of the day. But at the peak hours. Thank you." Mason, "Any one else wishing to speak in opposition? I close the public portion of the hearing. I'm concerned by the lack of traffic information that is here with the application. I've got a fairly good ground in traffic issues, . . . . its seems to me we're doing a lot of speculating here, both directions. You've given me a few counts, but you haven't given me an analysis of what these buses are going to do to the count. There's alot of difference between just adding ten that are going straight through, that i wouldn't concern me, but ten, that five are turning left and five turning right, and some of those are articulated, that concerns me a little bit. What t I would like to do is give you the option, I'd like, I could keep this open for a short period of time, a week or two, give you the option to evaluate for - me the impact that this facility would have on, uh, peak traffic hours, FS 1.� TRANSCRIPT CU 3-86 TRI-MET PAGE 11 particularly the evening hours, that seems to be the biggest concern in terms of that area. Uh, and that will include the intersection between Main and Commercial and then Commercial up through where you would be making your turns out of this facility. I would like to see what level of service we have right now, and how this would impact it. Quite frankly my biggist concern is safety. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . You know a bus thats trying to keep on schedule and trying to get out of there and someone who is trying to get home and trying to get down Commercial. I just see this very large game of chicken going on on Commercial and I just don't, you know, just don't want to see it do that. Why don't you see me, why don't you get that information to me. Now much time to you think you'll need?" Walsh, "It would depend on how much more data gathering we would need to do. What we, we would have no information, no recent information on, of the vintage of our Commercial Street information on Main Street counts and I don't know if Tigard has those as far as that study now. Randy Clarno "I might just add that, as I mentioned earlier we are, we have a consultant who just completed a complete downtown traffic circulation study and for several purposes involving signals . . . . . . . and I suggest they work h r with that Consultant and add the various factors in buses." Beth Mason, "Sounds like most of your works bean done for you. One of the options that comes to my mind, and I would like to see you address this and that is the possibilty of a right turn only on Commercial, out onto Commercial and what that would do to traffic flow and your scheduling, if its possible to route your buses and such " Walsh, "Thats something that we thought about and I can't give you the time in minutes, but its a concern for two reasons. One, we looked at that. Uh, there are two things that caused us to drop it without, before we got to this stage. The first of those is the distance around, if it was a regular grid system through this area, we would, its something we would look at. Pretty much immediately, I can't give you the distance, but to come, essentially you have to come out to Nall over to Burnham and back up Burnham, that leaves, thats a couple of minutes of running time, which I can't tell you the exact number but that would require some additional number of buses on the route to TRANSCRIPT - CU 3-86 TRI-MET PAGE 12 make up for that time. We might have to plug, on a daily basis, put one or two or three additional buses in service to make up that time." Mason, Weil now, let me say I'm very familiar with the Beaverton transit center. It's serves a very good purpose that I'm generally in favor of tansit centers, I'm not trying to kill this project at all I just have this concern, I would like to see you address it. Uh, given that you have this broad data that has been gathered by another Consultant, uh, one week, two weeks, I would like to continue to a date certain." . . . two people talking same time . . . Walsh, "Two. Let, let me say too, and think that we will have it well before that." Mason, "Let me look at my calendar. Keith do we have anything scheduled." Liden, "We have a hearing scheduled on the 27th, on Wednesday. Two weeks." Mason, "Two weeks, a day shy of two weeks." C Walsh, "Okay." Mason, "Okay, great. This matter is continued until August 27, 7:00 PM. So the applicant can address my concerns about traffic flow." Mason, "Excuse me, before I get into that, I meant to say something you said Mr. Walsh triggered, uh, something in mind. . . . . . . I should probably state for the record that I have a client who is in the business of providing pay telephones and is under subcontract to your vending contractor to put pay telephones on certain of these transit malls and particularly along light rail. Most of his contracting is along light rail run, although he is putting something in at the Barbur transit mall. Uh, I don't consider that in making this decision, but I should state that potential conflict, and I suppose if I approve this, my client could benefit by putting more pay telephones in. Just ; so we all know. I don't want any suprises out there. Alright." TRANSCRIPT CU 3-86 TRI-MET PAGE 13 SECOND HEARING Beth Mason. „Okay, this is August 27, 1986, at 7:00 PM, we're in the Council chambers for the City of Tigard. This is the time and place set for the regular agenda of the Hearings Officer. My name is Beth Mason, I'm the Hearings Officer for the City and to my immediate left is Keith Liden, the Planning staff representative. We have two items on our agenda this evening, I'll take them in the order in which they appear. The first is the continuation of Conditional Use CU 3-86 an application by Tri--Met to allow a off street transit center in the Central Business District. I continued that matter until tonight to consider the impact that the buses would have on traffic in that area, and I have been supplied with a traffic report done by Kittleson and Associates, and I might comment there usual good work . Uh, its a very nice report and a subsequent letter from Tri-Met as well. Those will be marked as exhibits, and I'm at a lost to tell you what numbers exhibits those will be because I didn't bring my notes from the other night. Uh, is the applicant or his representative here?” "I'm Jae Walsh, I'm Tri-Met, 4012 SW 17th, Portland, 97202. I'm going to make my presentation very short and then turn the Floor over to Gary Katsion, with Kittelson & Associate who did the work. The only thing that I want to add to the document that you have and our letter, is uh, one other item that you asked us to analize that I hadn't reported on in writing. Now that was the possibility of a right turn arrangement out of the transit center site. It would have the buses all turning right on Commercial to Hall to Burnham then back on to Main Street. I had mentioned just briefly that we had looked at that initially, we were not very excited about that and didn't pursue it any further for a couple of reasons. And those are basicaly the added operational costs to Tri-Met and the impact: on passengers that would be going through that route and I can just say briefly its about 9 tenths of a mile that loop would be about 9 tenths of a mile translates to a per run figure of $3.00 plus or minus added cost per run and I can go on. Counting that up by the day of the month and the year, but I think that, the really significant issue is what that does for the passenger, thats about a Four minute penalty on that trip and we're particularly concerned about the trunk line, the 8arbur Blvd. line 'x CRIPT CU 3-86 TRI--MET PAGE 14 TRANS -MET passengers. There's a slight penalty that they pay already for coming into the transit center in terms of the time alotted to their trip and then added to that is the addition 4 plus or minus minutes of running time. It make that trunk line must less competitive that it might be. Briefly, and that ties into the conclusions that Gary reached in his study. That in fact, the operations as they have evolved in our planning and through talking with Tigard staff, probably will work quite well. With, given the existing traffic situation. He did look, as was mentioned, at two different things. The traffic operations around the driveways, specifically at the site and second at the operations of Commercial and Main Street. I' ll turn it over to Gary at this point and then." Seth Mason, I do have one question. In his report he recommends that, uh, in your procedures of scheduling, uh the departure patterns that you allow the street bay buses leave prior to the buses. Can you do that?" Walsh, "Done." Bath Mason, "So you don't mind that as a condition of approval." Walsh, "Not at all . Its something that if that if it hadn't come up it would probably be something we would get back, feed back from drivers, we would probably get it as a request to the operations people anyway. Its good to have it pointed out now so we can start out from scratch that way." Beth Masson, "Okay." Walsh, "Bary." "Good evening, I'm Gary Kotsion, with Kittelson t Associates, 5212 SW Broadway, Portland, 97205. I prepared an analysis looking at the PM peak hour operations at the proposed transit site and also at the Main and Commercial Street intersection. The traffic counts for the existing years where taken from the Bob Keech traffic count that where just recently completed for the Main Steet/Tigard traffic inventory study done for the City. And I also conducted, uh, peak hour gap analysis along Commercial Street and what that does is analire the amount of time between passing vehicles and it included TRANSCRIPT CU 386 TRI-MET PAGE 15 both north bound and south bound vehicles. So it was the amount of time that any buses would have during the peak hour to exit the site. And the data we collected indicated that there where about 115 gaps of greater than 11 seconds during the peak hour and the total of that time for those 115 gaps was almost 50 minutes. So 50 minutes out of the peak 60 minutes, uh, are essentially free movements from the site. I determined the eleven seconds, uh, that it takes for an articulated bus to leave the site, based on buses starting from a dead stop, taking 2 1/2 seconds for a driver to preceive that its a clear wide open area for him to exit the site and then as shown in figure 2, uh, I figured 8 1/2 second point to where the vehicle gets straightened out completely and the north bound travel lane, and he's totally clear of, not only the south bound traffic, but also the left turn lane when the street gets widened to 40 feet. So its a very conservative estimate of the additional 8 seconds. He would actually be clear of the south bound traffic, probably within about 3 seconds. So its about double, when you consider the preception time, its actually about double of what it would actually take those buses to clear the south bound lanes. I think we've been conservative. we've indicated the worse case (end of tape). . . . . . . Commercial and Main Street intersection for both the existing traffic as the buses currently operate and then with existing traffic with the transit center and they essentialy came out with the r same level of service. A on both approaches, uh for Main Street, A for the right turn movements off of Commercial and C for the left turn movements. Then to get an estimate of what the traffic would be in the 2005, essentially at 20 year horizon period. I contacted Metro, Metro's models doesn't got into as such detail as I had hoped in this area and they just had projections for Pacific Highway and I felt that those would probably be higher than what would be expected for Commercial, or for Main Street. Mainly because this area is built up. You don't get &lot of the commute traffic on this that is expected for Pacific Highway, and so I, to be conservative and to look at a worst case, I used the same annual growth rate that their expecting for Pacific Highway. Which is about one percent per year. Uh, going over a nineteen year period that adds about 21 percent traffic. And then I added that traffic to the existing counts and reran the peak hour analysis, capacity analysis at the intersection, and it worsened the level of service on the left turn movement out of Commercial to a level of service 0. Thats still well within acceptable standards of the City for stop sign control. So I don't see much problem with the transit center located in this position." TRANSCRIPT CU 3-86 TRI-MET PAGE 16 , Beth Mason, "Okay, Thank you." �. Katsion. "Any questions?" Beth Mason, "None whatsoever." Katsion, "Thank you." Beth Mason, "Is there anvone else wishing to speak on this application." Geraldine Bail. "I'm Geraldine Ball, 11515 SW 41st, Tigard, and I am in favor of the transit center. I want to say that first and I was glad to hear that Mr. Kittleson had made a report because I had seen that on Saturday, Tri-Met down taking a count and you know on Saturday we don't have the traffic and I wanted to be sure the Hearings Officer was getting the correct information as to how such traffic there is, because, I know that I go down there at 5:00 o'clock and the road is Jam packed everyday, because that's when people are going into the post office, the last minute and what not. But if he's made a complete report, well that satisfies me because then you would be satisfied too. Thank you." Beth Mason, "Alright, thank you. Anyone else wishing to speak on the application?" Okay. I'll close the public hearing. I am prepared to make a decision on this application. I will approve the conditional use permit subject to the conditions found in the staff report and the additional condition as rocowmanded by Mir. Katsion that the departing buses, the scheduling of the departing, departure patterns allow for the street bay buses to leave prior to the other buses to give the best sight distance for both the but drivers and the motorist on Commercial Stoat. My written decision will be filed within 10 day. .: dj/1dy 'T+RANKMIPT CU 3-96 Tial-a"WT PAGE 17 r CITY OF TIGARD Washington County. Oregon J i XMXC19 OF FINAL ORDn - BY KUM Mt38 oMCBR I. Concerning Case Number(s): CU 3-86 2. game of Owner: TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OR. 3. Name of Applicant: Same Address 4012 SE 17th City Portland State OR Zig 9_7202 4. Location of Property: Address 8960 SW Commercial Legal Description 2S1 2AA lots 4901 b 4800 S. Mature of Application: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of an off-street transit enter aen ra us ness D str ct 6• JAUffi. Approval as requested _.ZL Approval with conditions Denial 7• Notice was published in the r and mailed to: r• posted at City Nall KX The applicant i owner* 72 is Owns" of record within the required dtance 1 The affected neighborhood planning Organization 2 Affected governmental agencies 8. Ills& Decision: TOM O11USZON SHALL U MXAL OM September 99 1986 S Ax APPEAL I8 tli tD. U10 adopted findings of fact, decision, and slateseat of conditioe<► can be abt&lmd fr m the Planning Dapartmmt, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Nall ilyd.. P.O. Boot 23297, Tiguld, Oregon 97223. 9. 1: &W party to the decision "W appeal Able _dec"ion in accordsateo with 15.32.2"(A) and Section '18.32.370 Niielt` peeoviAeg that a written appeal 11W be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is mumm P.K. Set. 9, 1986 '1q. iliE: If you have mW geestiags, -pi ss call this City TiiM►crd Planning Department. 63"1f1. 0237P BEFORE THE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION) No. FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO j CONSTRUCT A TRANSIT CENTER; CU 3-86 Tri-Met, Applicant. ) The above-entitled matter came before the Hearings Officer at the regularly scheduled meeting of August 14, 1986, and was continued for additional hearings to August 27, 1986, at the Tigard Civic Center Town Hall Room, in Tigard, Oregon; and The applicant requests a conditional use permit to construct a transit center as part of the Tri-Met system, property located on SW Commercial St. , more specifically described as Tax Lots 4800 and 4901, Map 2S1 2AA, City of Tigard, County of Washington, r State of Oregon; and The Hearings Officer conducted public hearings on August 14th and August 27th, at which time testimony, evidence and the Planning Department Staff Report were received; and N- The Hearings Officer adopts the findings of fact and conclu- sions contained in the Staff Report, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A" and incorporated by reference herein, and the Hearings Officer further adopts the findings of fact and conclusions contained in the report from Rittelson & Associates which report is marked as an exhibit in the record and is incorpo- rated by reference herein. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that CU 3-86 be and hereby is approved subject to the following conditions: Page 1 - CU 3-86 1 S i 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 2. Applicant shall construct a City standard full half-street improvement along SW Commercial Street; said improvement shall be constructed to minor collector street standards (40 feet new curb to existing curb minimum) and shall conform to a horizontal and ver- tical alignment to be approved by the Engineering Division. The design may be a modification of the preliminary L.I.D. design of record for SW Commercial Street, to facilitate blending of the pro- posed improvement with existing conditions. Concrete curb, side- walks, entry-exit ways, and street pavement (and crushed rock) , lighting and pedestrian vehicle marking is required; final design to be approved by the Engineering Division. Final design shall include street structural evaluation by Washington County's C.B.E. method. Standard minor collector structural requirements may not be sufficient. 3. Bus parking within 36 feet of the curb on the opposite side of Commercial Street shall not be permitted. Applicant shall provide the Engineering Division with a 3 lane street marking plan, from Main Street to applicant's southerly boundary, if bus parking will be between 36 and 40 feet of the curb on the opposite side of Commercial Street. 4. Five (5) sets of plan-profile public improvement con- struction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall' be submitted to the Engineering Division for approval. Page 2 CU 3-86 5. Sanitary sewer plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for approval. 6. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Division has issued approved public improvement plans. The Division will require posting of a 1008 Performance Bond, the payment of a permit fee and a streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES, BONDING AND AGREEMENTS. T. If storm water is to be directed onto the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, the applicant shall obtain a permit from Southern Pacific for outfall of stormwater into this right--of-way. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City prior to issuance of any approved plans or permits. S. A revised site/landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director's approval which includes the followings a. Bus parking and circulation plan approved by the Engineering Division. b. Location and design of bicycle parking spaces (minimum of two) . c. Adequate pedestrian circulation. 9. Landscaping material shown on the approved landscaping plan shall be installed prior to occupancy. Page 3 -- CU 3-86 10. A sign permit must be obtained for all signs that are moved or placed on the property or the building (contact Deborah Stuart 639-4171) . 11. Tax Lots 4800 and 4901 shall be combined into one parcel if the addition to the existing building causes it to straddle the property line. 12. This approval shall be valid for one year from the date of the final order. 13. The departure patterns at the Tigard Transit Center shall allow for the street bay buses to leave prior to the other buses to provide good sight distance for both bus drivers and motorists on Commercial S reet. DATED this da of August, 1986. HEARINGS OFFICER C _-e APPROVED: a A MASA Page 4 - CU 3-86 Y� i STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 2. 1 THURSDAY, AUGUST 14, 1986 - 7:00 TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL L 13125 SW HALL BLVD. (,� TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1 . General Information CASE: Conditional Use CU 3-86 REQUEST: To construct a transit center as part of the Tri-,Met system. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District ZONING DESIGNATION: CBD (Central Business District) APPLICANT: Tri-County Metropolitan OWNER: Same Transportation District of Oregon 4012 SE 17th Ave. Portland, OR 97202 LOCATION: 8960 SW Commercial Street (WCTM 2S1 2AA lot 4800 6 4901) 2. Background Information Conditional Use approval (CU 6-82) was granted by the Planning Commission in March, 1982. Tri-Met did not proceed because of delays in property acquisition and construction funding. 3. Vicinity Information All surrounding properties are zoned CBD. A commercial/warehouse building lies to the south, a bank and office building are to the north, retail and office buildings are on the opposite side of Commercial Street, and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way abuts the western property line. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description The applicant proposed to remove the Tigard Auto Body building and construct a bus transit center. The Greyhound building which also includes a barber shop, will remain and be incorporated as part of the center. The site plan features one-way circulation through the site and bus parking and passenger drop--off on Commercial Street. STAFF REPORT - CU 3-86 - PAGE I i 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. The storm water facilities in Main Street may not be adequate to accommodate full development in the downtown area and Commercial Street storm water facilities are virtually non-existent. If the railroad facilities are to be utilized as proposed, permission of the railroad will be required and the adequacy of downstream facilities must be shown. b. In 1974, an L.I.D. was proposed for Commercial Street but did not materialize. The street improvements on the opposite side of the street were constructed in a manner consistent with the design developed for the L.I.D. C. Parking restrictions will be necessary and the delineation between public right-of-way and the Tri-Met property must be clearly maintained. d. Due to the amount of anticipated pedestrian activity adequate street lighting is important. e. Commercial Street is designated as a minor collector street which is intended to accommodate two or three traffic lanes. The option for a third lane must be maintained requiring that no parking (including buses) be permitted within the 40 foot wide curb to curb street section. ., The Building Inspection Division has no objection to the request. NPO N i supports the proposal, but concerns were raised regarding parking enforcement, problems in the downtown area caused by drivers parking all day. The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District states that all buildings must be within 250 'Feet of a fire hydrant. No other comments have been received. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS It appears that with modification, the proposed transit center will be compatible with the Conditional Use approval criteria in Section 18.130.040(a) of the Community Development Code. The design is compatible with surrounding development and applicable standards for building height and setbacks, lot coverage, landscaping materials, parking for the barber shop/bus depot, and access have been met. Assuming the disposal of storm water can be accomplished, public facilities are adequate to serve the center. The proposal is consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies 8.2.1 and 8.2.2 which call for the promotion of public transportation. STAFF REPORT CU 3-86 - PAGE 2 �Y The primary issue that must be resolved is related to the parking of buses within the street section for Commercial Street. Vision of bus drivers will be inhibited somewhat by buses parked on the street but more importantly, the necessary number and width of travel and turning lanes will be prevented by the proposed design. In order to avoid this problem, buses cannot be allowed to park within the required 40 foot street width. The relocation of the bus parking which will maintain a 40 foot wide street section may cause design problems related to bus and pedestrian circulation as well as providing the required amount of landscaping. Tri-flet has indicated that the possibility exists to obtain a long term lease for additional area along the rear of the site. It is the opinion of the staff that minor modifications to the site plan can be made in accordance with Section 18.130.060 of the Code that are consistent with the concept presented. It is recognized that this transit center is intended for passenger drop-off and transfers and not for a park and ride facility. As a result, parking is only provided for the Greyhound terminal and barber shop. Although lung term car parking is not provided, some bicycle parking facilities should be installed. No specific standard is contained in the Code for this use, but observation of bicycles chained to transit shelters downtown suggest that at least two spaces should be provided. To eliminate the threat of vandalism, the provision of enclosed spaces similar to those at the Barbur Transit Center is recommended. ff C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning staff recommends approval of CU 3-86 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 2. Applicant shall construct a City standard full half-street improvement along SW Commercial Street; said improvement shall be constructed to minor collector street standards (40 feet new curb to existing curb) and shall conform to a horizontal and vertical alignment to be approved by the Engineering Division. The design may be a modification of the preliminary L.I.D. design of record for SW Commercial Street, to facilitate blending of the proposed improvement with existing conditions. Concrete curb, sidewalks, F entry-exit ways, and street pavement (and crushed rock), lighting and pedestrian vehicle marking is required; final design to be approved by the Engineering Division. Final design shall include street structural valuation by Washington County's C.B.E. method. Standard minor collector structural requirements may not be sufficient. 3. Bus parking within the 40 foot curb to curb minor collector street section shall not be permitted. STAFF REPORT CU 3-86 - PAGE 3 4. Five (5) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering for approval. 5. Sanitary sewer plan-profile public improvement construction plans cost estimate, stamped and one (1) itemized construction amped all eibose Registered Professional Cd ivil Engineer. detaxiilneering Division public improvements shall be submitted to the Eng for approval. l not 6. Constructed of proposed publicDivision hasntissuedlapproved commence public until after the Engineering improvement plans. The Division will require posting of a 100% Performance •Bond, the payment of a permit fee and a streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSER HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECFI IC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES BONGING AND AGREEMENTS. oto ific 7. If storm water is to t shallthe obtainu ahern permitcfrom Railroad right-of-way. the applican Southern Pacific for outfall of stormwater into this right-of-way. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City prior to issuance of any approved plans or permits. 8, A revised sitellandscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director's approval which includes the following: r a. Bus parking and circulation plan approved by the Engineering Division. b. Location and design of bicycle parking spaces (minimum of two). C. Adequate pedestrian circulation. 9. Landscaping material shown on the approved landscaping plan shall be installed prior to occupancy. 10. A sign permit must be obtained for all he building signs tha(Conct tDeboraare h St art or placed on the property o 639-4171). rcel if the 11. Tax Lots 4800 and 4901 ng building be mcauses bined lnit to to one straddle the addition to the exis ng property line. 12. This approval shall be valid for one year from the date of the final order. IhR PREPA ED BY: Keith Liden illiam A. Monahan Director of Planning & Senior Planner Development (dj/113) Y 1 TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN ` TRANSPORTATION L � DISTRICT OF OREGON V� IRI-Mg SE 11th AVENUE y � PORTLAND,OREGON 97202 C�(� TF, August 26, 1986 i t� City OF I IUAI?D Keith Liden PLANNING DEPT. Senior Planner City of Tigard Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Traffic Study for CU3-86, Tigard Transit Center Dear Keith: Pursuant to the Hearings officer's request, Tri-htet has completed an analysis of traffic impacts associated with the proposed Tigard Transit Center. As requested, particular attention was paid to potential safety or congestion ` problems on Commercial Street at the Transit Center and to potential congestion problems at the intersection of Main apd Commercial. The attached report, prepared by Gary Katsion, a traffic engineer affiliated with Kittleson and Associates, indicates that the net impact of the Transit Center on operation of either Main or Commercial Street is not significant. There are and will continue to be adequate gaps in Commercial Street traffic to allow safe ingress and egress for buses. The intersection of Main and Commercial was also evaluated using data gathered for Tigard's current study of downtown streets and projected future volumes. That analysis concludes that the p.m. peak hour level of service is unchanged with addition of the Transit Center. Even assuming a "worst case" scenario, Main and Commercial would operate at an acceptable level of service in the year 2005. This lack of impact is explained in part by the small net increase in turning movements over current peak hour bus operations. In conclusion, I believe the attached analysis speaks clearly to the potential for traffic-related problems (or lack thereof) associated with the Tigard Transit Center. If you have any questions about the report , please contact me at 238-4905. Sincerely, J alsh oject Planner JW:11 cc: Beth Mason, Hearings Officer Randy Clarno, City Engineer's Office .t .3 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES TRANSPORTATION PUINNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 512 SW.BROWMY • PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 • (503)228-5230 'f NFMRAMUN August 26, 1966 TO: Nr. Joe Walsh, Tri-Met FROM: Gary D. Katsion, P.B. SUBJECT: Tigard Transit Center, Commercial Street, Tigard, Ore. Traffic Impact Analysis, Project No. 63.00 Bittelson & Associates has reviewed the proposed site plan, pre- pared by Wilsey & Ham (July 1986) , and visited the site for the proposed Tri-Met Tigard Transit Center on Commercial Street, just south of Main Street. A traffic engineering analysis of the ex- pected bus operations at the site egress driveway and the Main Street/Commercial Street intersection was conducted to identify potential traffic impacts. The specific issues discussed in this memorandum include: o Site-generated traffic; o Existing traffic operations; o Bus operating characteristics; o Peak hour level of service/capacity analysis; o Sight distance requirements. The traffic engineering analysis was conducted following review of the City of Tigard Hearing Officer comments with you on August 19, 1986. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 1984, and the Institute of Transportation (ITB) Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook were util- ized in the preparation of this memorandum. Conclusions: o The proposed Tigard Transit Center is not expected to impact the traffic operations of the adjacent streets. The p.m. peak hour level of service at the Main Street/Commercial Street intersection will be the same 9 with or without the proposed site under present and future (2005) traffic volume conditions. e fi o The existing stop sign control of the Main Street/Commercial Street intersection will provide for acceptable level of service operations for the existing and future traffic volumes with the proposed site. The 1986 level of service is expected to be "C" and the year 2005 level of service was calculated to be "O" with the proposed transit center. o The expected gaps in vehicle flow along Commercial Street will easily accommodate entering/exiting of buses at the site access driveways. o The site plan allows for a minimum of 250 feet of un- impeded sight distance for bus drivers leaving the site. This distance provides a safe stopping sight distance for motorists traveling at 35 miles per hour. it is recommended that the departure of the buses from the two street bays occur before the remaining buses. This recommended bus operations procedure will greatly increase the site distance for both bus drivers and Commercial Street motorists. Site Generated Traffic The proposed Tri-Met Transit Center is expected to have 39 bus trips during the p.m. peak hour (4:30 to 5:90 p.m. ) . There will arc an increase of _i ght- bus movements atthe Main Street/ -�. - Commercial Street intersection. Existing Traffic Operations The existing p.m. peak hour turn movements at the Main Street/ Commercial Street intersection were compiled by Robert Keech, P.E. , Inc. during an inventory of traffic volumes on Main Street in July, 1986. The peak hour was found to occur between 4:30 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. Figure 1 shows the existing volumes rounded to the nearest 5 vehicles. An intersection capacity analysis was conducted with the existing volumes and the stop sign control on the Commercial Street approach. Both Main Street approaches operate at level of ser- vice "A", while the Commercial Street approach operates at level of service "C". Levels of Service for a particular roadway or intersection is a qualitative measure of various factors which influence traffic operations. The factors which influence the traffic operations include speed, travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to P maneuver, driver comfort, safety and vehicle operating costs. Six levels of service have been established and are designated by ;t the letters A through F, providing the best to worst service in �_ - 7 terms of driver satisfaction. For signalized intersections, the level of service is generally evaluated in terms of an equivalent range of a quantitative measure, the volume/capacity ratio. The level of service D, with a corresponding v/c ratio of 0.8 - 0.9, or better is the desired level of service for design by the City of Tigard. For unsignalized intersections, the level of service is evaluated in terms of reserve capacity at each approach to the Intersection. The level of service z, with a corresponding reserve capacity of O miner street approaches, ito 100 vehicles, is acceptable for the not. f signal warrant conditions are not A vehicle gap analysis was conducted by Kittelson & Associates on August 22, 1986, during the p.m. peak hour. All gaps between Passing vehicles in both directions along Commercial Street were noted. As detailed in the next section, vehicle gaps greater than eleven seconds were identified as being adequate for safe bus exiting operations. A total of 115 gaps greater than eleven seconds were recorded and totaled more than 50 minutes of possible unimpeded movements from the site. Bus Operating Characteristics The P=oposed location of the Tigard Transit Center will require buses that use Main Street to turn left out of the site. This left turn movement will be made by 16 buses during the p.m. peak hour. It is essential to the safe operations of the facility that there is adequate gaps in the existing and future traffic flows along Commercial Street. The time it takes for an articulated bus to negotiate a left turn from the proposed site has been calculated at 8.5 seconds. Figure 2 illustrates the distance traveled during the 8.5 seconds. The bus was assumed to be stopped at the driveway prier to turning and the acceleration rate utilized was 3.0 miles per hour per second. 3 An additional 2.5 seconds was added to allow for perception reaction time of the bus driver. Therefore, and eleven second gap in the Commercial Street vehicle flow is required for an articulated bus to safely enter Commercial Street. With over 50 minutes of gap time available under the existing traffic volumes conditions, there will be no unnecessary delays to bus movements from the site. Peak Hour Operations With the Transit Center Figure 3 shows the 1986 p.m. peak hour turn movements at the Mai Street/Commercial Street intersection with the n proposed transit Y center bus operations. The level of service on all three ( approaches remains== the rise as the existing conditions. Level of service "A" on the Main Street approaches and "C" on the Commercial Street approach. The facture (Year 2005) traffic volumes on Main Street and Commercial Street were not available from METRO. The regional transportation model is not currently set up with these streets as part of the network. METRO, however, did have projections for Pacific Highway in the area that indicated an annual growth rate of about one percent. Since the future growth of traffic along Main Street and Commercial Street will be directly related to currently undeter- mined redevelopment of existing parcels, a one percent annual growth rate seemed reasonable for this analysis. The existing traffic volumes were increased by approximately 21 percent to estimate the Year 2005 traffic volumes. Figure # illustrates the future p.m. peak hour traffic volumes. The Year 2005 level of service at the Main Street/Comaaercial Street intersection was calculated to be "A" on the Main Street approaches and "D" on the Commercial Street approach. Intersec- tion capacity worksheets have been provided at the end of this memorandum. .p Sight Distance Requirements Figure 5 illustrates that bus drivers leaving the proposed site have approximately 250 feet of sight distance looking northbound along Commercial Street with a bus parked in the street-side bay. This is the minimum distance needed for a safe stopping sight distance for vehicle speeds of 35 mph. • it is recommended that procedures and scheduling of the departure patterns at the Tigard Transit Center allow for the street bay buses to leave prior to the other buses. The departure of the street buses will result in very good sight distance for both bus drivers and motorists on Commercial Street. � a 35Q..���.. '�■360 o--75 a 1986 PM PEAK HOW TRAFFIC. EXl TING EUS OPERATK)M Figure OEM TriM®t Tigard TG August. 1986 ,F µ 1 a o � ,J d o �t Nf)CL ot � h � � d I Ln E o r 11 N - el N ' d . REOUIRIE® CAP FOR BlJS OPERATIONS �9MIMI Tri-Met Tigard TC Z August 19 f swan Street 50 0-90 1 ID fn qr Ire -� x 1988 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC WTrH TRANSIT CENTER Ftgurn Tri-Met Tigard TO .. S August 1986. . S W mom$treat 415----+ -o --410 . b0 AV--�5 � i cn � 2005 PM PEAK HOUR WAPPiC VVffH 'i'RAt+lSIT CENTER. Figure Tri-Met Tigard TO 4 t �'s y r Y•, r .. k p h �I _r• ;� �,K 4 Md~� rpt t ' ' ti • I � M �.0 { rs +• n • i�l�- •�.--..a�r�l.yCs �i 1 �y Y 1 � • V 1. Tigard , v This is a 3 — Way intersection 1 wMaJor street is= MAIN STREET 2) Minor street is, COMMERCIAL STREET Flolumes 4) Sight adjustments 5 Traffic Composition on major 6) Traffic Composition an minor 7) Speed = 30 8) Number of lanes = 2 507. of 3 impeding 9) Population >= 250sOOD 10) Percentages of 11) Shared lanes= None traffic In lanes= 100% of 2 an right 12) Peak Hour Factor - 1.00 major minor 13) Corner At Stops no Accel . lanes normal radius MC D O 143 Corner iii no right turn lanes normal turn Traffic Cars 96 95 15) Corner C= Comp. SU/RV 2 1 16) Corner 0+ Comb. 2 4 17) Grades'& +Os f = +0 18) Exit to DOS Enter >ll to changes 0 to recalculates 18 to quit; move. 2 3 4 5 7 9 7Val . 350 45 75 360 60 125 *Vol . 350 45 77 360 63 131 sight * * +0.00 # +0.00 +0.00 HI cap. s * 905 * 337 818 xcap. 627 * 274 687 LOS a e A * C A 19SCo T 'AFFIG - Ek1SZ1►1Fa BUS bPERP.Tto 1►18 Y fi 3 ,,m3' r r This is a 3 - Way intersection 1`) Major street is' MAIN STREET 2) Minor street is, COMMERCIAL STREET 3) Volumes 4) Sight adjustments 5) Traffic Composition on major 6) Traffic Composition on minor 7) Speed = 30 8) Number of Ianes = 2 507, of 3 impeding 9) Population >= 250,000 10) Percentages of 1t) Shared lanes ' None traffic in lanes' 100% of 2 on right 12) Peak Hour Factor = 1 .00 major minor 13) Corner A' Stops no Accel . lanes normal radius MC 0 0 14) Corner 8' no right turn lanes normal turn Traffic Cars 96 95 15) Corner C' Comp. SU/RV 2 1 16) Corner D' Comb. 2 4 17) Grades'e = +Os f = +0 18) Exit to DOS Enter a to changes 0 to recalculates 18 to quit' Move. 2 3 4 5 7 9 Vol . 345 ` 5D 80 355 65 130 *Vol . 345 50 82 355 68 136 sight a a +0.00 a +0.00 +0.00 cep. * a 905 a 338 821 xcap * * 822 a 270 685 LOS a * A * C A TRAFF IG TRAlJSIT CEIJT�R. This is a 3 - Way intersection 1) !Major street is: MAIN STREET 2) Minor street is: COMMERCIAL STREET 3) Volumes 4) Sight adjustments 5) Traffic Composition on major 6) Traffic Composition on minor 2) Speed - 30 8) Number of lanes 2 508 of 3 impeding 9) Population. >- 250,000 10) Percentages of 11) Shared lanes: None traffic in lanes: 1008 of 2 on right 12) Peak Hour Factor - 1.00 major minor 13) Corner A: Stop, no Accel. lane, r-)rural radius MC O 0 14) Corner 8: no right turn lane, normal turn Traffic Cars 96 95 15) Corner C: Comp. SU/RV 2 1 16) Corner D: Comb. 2 4 17) Grades:e - +0, f $ +0 18) Exit to DOS Inter a to change, 0 to recalculate, 18 to quit: Stowe. 2 3 4 5 T 9 vol . 415 60 95 430 80 160 WMI. 415 60 98 430 84 167 eight • • +0,00 * +0.00 +0.00 p*p, • * 833 • 262 755 gip, * * 735 * 178 587 LOS • • A • D A 2005 s .��i''"i-�' _ '''' _,.�,'',.se-._ _ _ = ..t ..`- _3...,._ _ _ r..'....�r'�.R.X':.a3.. .E.,_,3_td. :.-..�s..sds.%.diis•a:`..v4 'Wim, TIGARD TRANSIT CENTER CONDITIONAL USE NARRATIVE BACKGROUND Tri-Met proposes to construct an off-street transit center on Commercial Street, approximately 250 feet southwest of Main Street. The Tigard Transit Center will provide a central location for transfers between lines serving the southwest sector of Tri-Met' s service area--the Barbur Boulevard trunk line, the Westside crosstown line, and Tigard area local lines. The Center will include loading and layover positions for up to eight buses, sheltered platform area and other passenger amenities, secure bicycle parking, and landscaping including street trees. The existing Greyhound station will remain on the site. No major changes in operations or appearance are proposed for that portion of the site. Tri-Met has sought a transit center location in Tigard for several years, and did obtain a conditional use permit for a transit center at this location in 1982. Delays in property acquisition and construction funding caused the project to be deferred until this year. It is Tri-Met's intention to begin site work this fall with completion and occupancy in the spring of 1987. SITE AND VICINITY INFORMATION The site of the proposed transit center is an approximately 33,000 square foot parcel on the southwest side of Commercial Street. The site is currently occupied by two structures--one housing the Tigard Auto Body Works, the other the Tigard Greyhound Station. The body shop is a non-conforming use in the CBD zone. Adjacent uses along Commercial Street include the Washington Federal Savings Bank to the northwest, and a vacant commercial building to the southeast. The rear of the site abuts the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Directly across Commercial Street is a small office complex with off-street parking. Commercial Street is designated a Minor Collector in Tigard's Comprehensive Plan. No current 24 hour traffic counts exist, but extrapolation of recent peak hour counts conducted by Tri-Met indicate an average daily traffic volume between two and three thousand vehicles per day. The site's frontage on Commercial Street is not fully improved - there are curbs and sidewalks in front of the Greyhound por- tion of the site only. The northeast side of the street is improved with a side- walk and temporary curbing. Current transit service to downtown Tigard (Main and Commercial) is provided by line 5-Barbur Boulevard, with service at 10 to 30 minute intervals between Portland and King City or Sherwood; line 77-Beltline, with 30 minute headways linking northwest Portland, Beaverton, Washington Square, Tigard, and Lake Oswego; and lines 43 Taylors Ferry and 45-Garden Home, with one hour headways serving the Tigard-Washington Square area. A layover zone for the local lines now exists on Commercial near the transit center site. Although there is currently no overall coordination between the scheduled arrivals and departures of these lines, in (� excess of 600 passengers per day arrive and depart from Main and Commercial with a "° large number of transfers between lines. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. The current stops at Main and Commercial , and the current layover zones along Commercial will all be relocated to the transit center. Schedules for the bus lines using the transit center will be adjusted to provide "timed transfers" wherein all the buses arrive nearly simultaneously, hold until all buses arrive, then depart together. This system improves the level of transit service by facilitating the transfers between lines that are often necessary to serve multi- centered suburban development. Initially, an average of two timed transfers per hour will be scheduled: every half-hour the crosstown and the trunk (Barbur) lines will meet, and those lines plus the local will meet once an hour. All trunk line trips will also pass through the center, even though that particular bus may have no timed transfer scheduled. Based on September 1986 service levels, an estimated 221 buses will pass through the center on a daily basis. This does not represent an increase in the number of buses now going through downtown Tigard. The only increase is in the number of Barbur Boulevard buses that will be making the one-block detour off Main to the transit center. In addition to the bus traffic, Tri-Met anticipates that up to 50 cars in the morning peak and somewhat less in the afternoon will use the "kiss-and-ride" or drop-off spaces provided on Commercial Street. The site will be developed to accommodate up to eight buses at a time. Six spaces will be provided on the site, and two will be accommodated within the Commercial Street right-of-way. Tigard staff has favored a design that removed all bus positions from Commercial , along with one-way circulation on the site and separate driveway access for the Greyhound Station in order to minimize congestion and maximize sight distance around the transit center. Site constraints have pre- cluded accomplishing all three changes, but one-way circulation and separate Greyhound access have been included. This arrangement should not be a significant problem because of the relatively low traffic volumes on Commercial Street and because buses would occupy the on-street positions for only three or four minutes each hour. However, in order to mitigate any potential traffic conflict with { buses on Commercial Street, a 14-foot travel lane will be provided. At a minimum, Tri-Met will provide sidewalks, curbs, and street improvements to City of Tigard standards (including concrete surfaces for bus parking areas) . Street and on-site lighting will be provided to meet Tri-Met or Tigard standards, whichever are greater. Nine 2-1/2 inch red maple street trees are proposed. r On-site, the emphasis will be on landscaping and passenger-oriented amenities, including three separate sheltered waiting areas, covered walkways, seating, and secure bicycle parking. The only changes proposed for the Greyhound portion of the site are minor modifications to the facade and inclusion of restroom facilities for Tri-Met drivers. The shelter system will serve the dual purpose of providing weather protection on each of the islands, as well as serving to emphasize the site's internal pedestrian circulation. Fran the street, the combination of the distinctive architectural lines of the shelter and the street trees will give a strong visual reference point in a portion of downtown Tigard which is now somewhat lacking in identity. k 2 _ F J � M For public services other than transportation there will be minimal impacts. Stormwater calculations indicate that the existing ditch drainage will be adequate ( for site runoff. The eight inch water line and ten inch sanitary sewer in Commercial Street will provide an adequate level of service. CONCLUSION The proposed transit center merits approval because it provides significant public benefits without significant detriments or costs and because it meets the standards for a conditional use and for the CBD zone. The transit center and a timed transfer system will support economic development generally, and specifically, development in Downtown Tigard through improved transit service and better facilities for riders; by replacing a non-conforming use with a well—designed facility providing significant public improvements and amenities; and through a decrease in traffic congestion with over 80% of the buses in Downtown Tigard moving their stops off-street. In order to minimize any detrimental traffic effects, the site is designed with one way bus circulation and complete separation of auto access to the Greyhound station and Tri-Met and Greyhound buses. The proposal also meets the conditional use tests and CBD zone standards of Tigard's Community Development Zone. The landscaping and access provisions are met or exceeded with the proposal , all required public improvements will be provided, and the net effect on all public services and facilities, particularly transportation, will be positive. The site has ample room to accommodate the proposed use as well as to provide a high level of amenities for both users and the community at large. The landscaping, the architectural elements and the materials and finishes used on the site will all emphasize the role of the Tigard Transit Center as an "anchor" on Commercial Street and a key presence in Tigard. 3 s Date ----moo, 021 air i acs e 09 V� W « on J _ A aOr a � 49 w y rw �i mar Po s 00! •Ko9►i OC! X7,001 too Ott9►or►N Y'zrlr �� 00 ri 001 IV 001Ile ol �* W t° +�, w �',''�►',b�'y, � „* e�ara�'i... M. ►e1rS 4'zb! !t .r. c1 � G�,2 /.f f4 � _ "o.ir.srh` L'.l►1 �. - - . 00 dOat ° e lite V W a► e� o o 21 _ J N v��o =�• I N � •-` J i. CSO�e►s 6 J a = ' W �a - 0 zzu Ip W XL Gwqo: i W Q + $ o u Die C r ns T I - i 1 Qom+• L 1 !` o� ' METROP.O RAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON OA TRI-MET 4012 SE 17th AVENUE . PORTLAND OREGON 97202 July 3, 1986 Bill Harding, Projects Engineer Southern Pacific Railroad 800 NW 6th Portland, OR 97209 Dear Mr. Harding: Thank you for taking the time to review Tri-Met's plans for the Tigard Transit Center. As we discussed on Monday, the loss of five feet of property through past survey inaccuracies may hinder our development plans, and Tri-Met is interested in acquiring excess Southern Pacific right-of-way to add to our site. The purpose of this letter is to formally request that Southern Pacific consider j sale of up to .25 feet of property along the approximately 330 feet of our common r boundary with the Southern Pacific right-of-way. The area of our interest is marked on the enclosed map. I have also included some photos of the area in question. Tri-Met expects to complete the transit center in the spring of 1987, and design is currently underway. Thus an early indication of whether a sale is possible will be critical to our development plans. If Southern Pacific gives such an indication within the next few weeks, I would expect that an .agreement on appraisals, a mutually agreeable schedule, and related matters could then be reached. Please do not hesitate to call me at 238-4905 if you have any questions or would tike further information. Sincerely, e Walsh roil Planner rm Encls. __s S.W.Eleventh Avenue/Portland.Orcgo1205 (503)227-0455 r'rl� OCY7 / a� ^ e� -et1 �i��uvt - A /0 .. —, K- 67"t-CC-� carr InC19 e 3- 00 " r f t.3'7 4 W = t -3"7 w PROJ E ro �' SHEET Na_.._."q', 521 S.W.Eleventh Avenue/Portland,Orego..47205 (503)227-0455 relirm verger- De veto ped rea-s A r era = Z 7/ X50 0 ff Z c? Z(:D Z 4 real �✓ _.Ec5.7- GOO-s k+ i-,40 o. cou f !+ © L/ ear J o.v W► - -r--�-==sem► Lar.J scape Aid radroa d a ree;( Wrat'n 4� = 1zs x -_� �ZS = a. z S 5ips4;e/ J "IS�a0 ' For Q , - 0-00 Z , 3 G c S De55 A /ocv PFIEPARED BY W PROJECT r- /" Ce SHEET NQ�OF..Z_ : � (r,-Z '-`8�o ,' S r S 9-U)G V ,JOB'NQ, 278-b �1 _,; �.. _ . � - V�' .nom j i 1 � _ `�•., t ' � � { � � � � ',� � � � r � � + - �' .._. �' - _ 1 . : � � � � N � � ��_�. � 1 _� �ryP, i � � --- �' ' Q � � r M . � �. - � - � .. � � t � � � � _ ,� v �, o � �� a 03 � � � - ,,.�...-- .--.�-- � - r ` � .! 'r.� � � — �� Ji � ...,• i . �. _. _;_ - ., ,. .. _. �. � .. , . � ��� �� j ORy.�• oIN , i ! 7 M I - S - ! j ! N 1,41rNs 40 Rqw- _ . t ; i I � 1 Id t i i{ � 110 � �• �,•. �t 1 oc- f TRI-CITY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON TRI-MET 4012 SE TNh AVENUE PORTLAND.OREGON 07202 Date: July 11, 1586 To: Keith Liden, Senior Planner, City of Tigard From: Joe Walsh, Project Planner, Tri-Met Subject: Additional Materials for CD Submittal 71 elated are some miscellaneous materials related to the Conditional Use Submittal for the Tigard Transit Center. I'm including data sheets for our peak hour traffic counts on Commercial Street, calculations supporting the decision to continue with the site's existing ditch drainage system, and a copy of correspondence with Southern Pacific on the question of acquiring excess right-of-way. I hope these items are useful, and if you ave ve oth r questions or need more 4905. information, please do n s JW:lfl Attach. t CITY OF TIGARD,_ OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 22, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 15. 1986 ISSUElAGENDA TITLE: Frontier PREVIOUS ACTION: Market/Randall Land Swamp discussion PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton DEPT HEAD OK . (;TTY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Robert Randall -- POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The applicant has requested that this item be postponed to a later date to allow their Engineer to provide input, ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED -- FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Postpone this item until October 13, 1986. = P djl166 ..}r>tt ?:'• `�, Sik.am«...rcxy'.x.::, .ta .'tri t-.'Y7+., .,'s"-" _ _ _ CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY �N AGENDA OF: September 22th 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: Aug_ u 2t 18, 1986 -- PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Ordinance—No Parking — Genesis Laop PREPARED BY: John S. Ha man REQUESTED BY: Comm Dev De,�t & Citizen ' + CITY ADMINISTRATOR: ----- DEPARTMENT HEAD OX: -- - POLICY ISSUE --— INFORMATION SUMMARY 1, Note the attached Letter of request for City action attached hereto. 2. Staff concurs with this request and parkiherewng tatPtheomosttsoutherlyil Pass the attached Ordinance restricting parkin entrance to Genesis subdivision. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION ING CHAPTER PASS THE ORDINAfi1C,pTITLEICIPAL CODE IBYNADDING CE NTONSECTION G AND UlOL28�130 TO PROHIBIT 10.28, OF THE TIG►. •.1 MUNICIPAL PARKING ON A PORTION OF OF SW GENESIS LOOP, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING s AN EFFECTIVE DATE." t JH:mj2 ORDINANCE NO, 86— Page 2 ,. • s VVYv 4-5 a ' JUN 8 7 1986 Bill o& tta � &i'j111'"" 1;71 Drop m /y1Y, fYj o&V Hz:��j i �rSpae6r part y°ou 16,S7- c s,� s �pe�- Secd�c. efs /k Ste-&FT has S42420a r jS1Q.� Cts' GCJ d-�Si D iJ7=a 6 - -fu Na-rI tJ , 7 - rtisr'moa ��- GermyQ,r, i sp�cc,z an) %WDS / -S Itz" 7r ; tel m� , 04-v- rE-Pal r- ;5E,, ca-f- -- u t m e--P--- -4-9i --P----4- i s Carr F,c- is rs r b.!J ' bo iu rf-s -r LAO O3 ' u _ 1 VA-1-6 aJ e-r- ,Ua a ssQ� 1 _irk, s _` 5sd/ ,plts5 -PivFFs_ 77W h 1's -, v moves Ue4lC,Jes r no .3�ec 1S problaw� . LC,,. rw tk , CITY OF TIGARD OREGON L �J COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 22 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 9 1986 ( ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Street Svst_em PREVIOUS ACTION: None Development Change Refund for Tigard Christian Church PREPARED BY: Randy Clarno DEPT HEAD OK ''=�'-CITY ADEN OK REQUESTED BY: Tigard Christian Church POLICY ISSUE Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 3 Section 20.055 provides for developers/property owners to receive a credit against System Development Charges for construction of extra capacity improvements. (Collectors 6 Arterials) street INFORMATION SUMMARY The Tigard Christian Church has requested a refund of a Portion of Street System Development charges it paid (attached); said refund amount being asaciated with the extra capacity construction of S.W. Hall Blvd. The Engineering Divisions review of their request shows differences in line item and total amounts as shown on the attached request. These differences have been discussed with the Church and they agree with Engineering Staffs evaluation. The total requested refund amount that the church is eligible for is $4,428.52. Total SDC fees paid to the City by the Church was $5,600. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Deny the Tigard Christian Church's request. 2. Approve their request and authorize staff to process a refund check in the amount of $4,428.52. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Church's refund request and direct staff to issue ��- The Engineering Division recommends that Council approvee Tigsti n of $4,428.52. theChr1amount mj/11 f gristol's Church Construction 'We P.O.BOX 9627 POFD LAND,OREGON 117206- 3527 (609)771.2933 August 21, 1986 Randy Clarno City of Tigard P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 17223 RE: TIGARD CHRISTIAN STREET DEVELOPMENT FEES Dear Randy: As per city ordinance 3.20.055 we are requesting a refund of the street development fees paid for the Tigard Christian Church oreirnburject. We sed paid $5,600.00 in fees and are requesting $5,600. to us because of the work we are doing to widen Hall Boulevard. The below information was taken from the City of Tigard standards for both an 'arterial street section' and a 'local street section.' The unit costs were provided by Bill Page Construction. Below is a breakdown of the cast difference between the two and amount of refund due to us. Linear Feet along Hall Blvd.: 276 feet Required width of 1/2 arterial standard: 25 feet Required width of 1/2 local standard: 17 feet Required arterial sidewalk: 8 feet wide Required local sidewalk: 5 feet wide It Material Arterial Local Difference Unit Amount for pmt Price Refund R R T}pe eamt_ R $1,192.20 Excay. 426.72cy 188.28cy 233.44cy $ S.00cy - IFs�17 SZ�-'.zG7�873.38- S1VvjA > Rodc 340.74cy 144.81cy 6..00 127.7ton 67. 7ton 34 Wt Asphalt '- Total Cost Difference of Arterial and Local - Z Since street development fees were $5,600.00 and the difference between the arterial and the local street improvements exceeded this amount, we are requesting a refund of $3,600.0'''. The check needs to be made ovt to Bristols Church Construction. If you have any questions, Please call me at 252-7300. Sincerely, L� Q4-t J- b- � 4 �-' David G. Bristol DB:bb cc: Tigard Christian Church a, 3.20.055--3.20 .070 C An average cost per lineal foot of a standard local street { will be kept on file by the public works director and updated annually. This cost per lineal foot shall be used as the standard for judging when the cost of required public improve- ments qualify as a credit against the system development charge. (Ord. 78-53 S4, 1978; Ord. 77-26 S5, 1977) . 3.20.055 Credit for costs incurred in making certain improvements at time of development. In cases where the planning commission, site development plan and architectural review board or planning director determine that certain public improvements are necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare before development of a parcel of land may ensue, the cost of any of these required improvements which are deemed extra-capacity facilities, as defined in Section 3.20.020, shall be a credit against the total system develop- ment charge that the developer would otherwise be required to pay. In determining those costs which qualify as contributing to extra-capacity street facilities, it is understood that each property in the city is considered responsible for pro- vision for a standard local street (Tigard Municipal Code, Section 17.28.040) , sidewalk, street lighting (Portland General Electric's specifications) , and storm drainage. An average cost per lineal foot of a standard local street will be kept on file by the public works director and updated annually. This cost per lineal foot shall be used as the standard for judging when the cost of required public improvements qualifies as a credit against the system development charge. (Ord. 78-53 55 (part) , 1978: Ord. 77-26 S6, 1977) . 3.20.060 Ma 'or street capital ro ect fund. There is createc' 3 e irate and entitled major street capital pro- ject fund." All funds derived from the system development charge are to be placed in the major street capital project fund and be segregated by accounting practices from all other funds of the city; and;that portion of the system"development charge calculated and 0ol.ected on account of street facilities shall be used for no puzpos nstruction, :,and extending e other that those activities nec- esgaxy to the:inet lj.i g, coextra capacity street fact-lities as defined in�Section .20b20. All funds wil3 -be expended in accordance;.with a capital im- k., provements program to be adopted and reviewed annually by the city council. (Ord. 78-53 S5 (part) , 2978; Ord. 77-26 s S7. 1977):. a 3.20.070 Appeals. Any person who is aggrieved by any decision required or permitted to be made by the city adminis- trator under this chapter may appeal that decision to the city eoun�.il, by filing a written request with the city recorder, describing with pari. ticularity the decision of the city admnis- ._ trator _€rom w" 1' ft'�the,person appeals. 1_ri`.eonsidering the _ 39=9 (Tigard 1/15/ " a � ♦... �. ...- ... .,may - f CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY { AGENDA OF: September 15, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 22, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Economic PREVIOUS ACTION: Adoption of resolution Devela nt Rnla Discussion 83-103 on November 7 1983 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Ann Newton DEBT HEAD CN{ �TY ADMIN OK REQUESTED 8Y: Economic Deve. Comm. POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council revise resolution 83-103 which created the Economic Development Committee. INFORMATION SUMMARY During the Council/Economic Develoment Workshop, the Committee expressed concern about its role and responsibilities- To better define the role, the Coavmittee was asked to generate ideas• On September s is to modify resolution the Economic c n 1O3 Development Committee will be discussing proposals Committee Attached is a COPY to reflect the rola of the Economic Development of Resolution 83-103. Th: 2omic De City Counment cil muting,ttee will present proposed changes at the Sept ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Committee's proposed changes and take 1. Review the Economic Development ..+; action. lopment Committee's 2. Review the Economic Dove proposed changes and delay action. FISCAE IMPACT 3 SUGGESTED ACTION Review the Economic Development Committee's proposed changes and take action as appropriate. dj1166 e� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 83- IN THE MATTER OF CREATION OF AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 83--99. WHEREAS, the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan, contains an Economy Element which identifies the need for an Economic Development Program, and WHEREAS, the element calls for the creation of an economic development steering committee to assist the City in developing and implementing an economic development program, and WHEREAS, the Director of Planning and Development has worked with a steering committee to formulate an economic fact sheet describing the City and its resources, and WHEREAS, the Director has now recommended the formation of an official Economic Development Committee to build upon the comprehensive plan and the work of the steering committee, and WHEREAS, the City Council has indicated its interest in forming an official Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City of Tigard hereby creates the Economic Development Committee to work with the Director of Planning and Development to prepare an economic development plan for the City. 2. The Committee will consist of nine members, no more than two of whom may be non residents of the City of Tigard, to be appointed by the City Council. Initially, four members will be appointed for two year terms and four for one year terms. The remaining position, that of the Mayor, will run continuous with the term of office. Subsequent appointments, except that of the Mayor, will be for two year terms except where an appointee is completing the unexpired term of a previous committee member. Committee members shall receive no compensation. 3. The Committee shall be composed of the following nine members: a. The Mayor of Tigard b. A representative of the Tigard Triangle Area. C. A representative of the Central Business District. d. A representative of the North Tigard/Cascade Blvd. area. e. A representative of the .72nd Avenue Industrial area. f. A commercial banking representative. g. An at large member. h. An at large member. An at large member. RESOLUTION NO. 83-�3 h N 4. The Director of Planning and Developiment and a representative of the Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce will serve as ex-officio members. . 5. The Committee is authorized to create special subcommittees and enlist the aid of private citizens to study special areas of concern and assist in the compilation of area inventories. 6. The Committee shall meet at least once in every calendar month at a specified time and place. PASSED: By the City Council on the day of ATTEST: ty Eacarder PWF - y of TIFpR APPROVED TO FORM: City Attorney s: RESOLUTION 83-JO3 (WAH.-dmj<02151i ' 1k:t :3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY j AGENDA OF: September 22, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 15, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA 'TITLE: Jack Park PREVIOUS ACTION: Discussion on restrooms Jules 28, 1986 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton _ DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: City. Council r POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council request permission from the Federal Bureau of Recreation to remove the Jack Park restrooms? INFORMATION SUMMARY on July 28, 1986, the City Council discussed whether or not to request permission from the Federal Bureau of Recreation to remove the restrooms from Jack Park. At that meeting the Council directed staff to study the options and report back. A copy of the July 28, 1986, minutes and packet of information is attached. The Park Board, at their September 16, 1986, meeting would like to discuss the future of Jack Park. Staff suggests that Council postpone action on this item until the Park Board has had a chance to iacu>a it. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Postpone action on the restrooms until the Park Board has discussed the future of Jack Park. 2. Direct the staff to take specific action on the Jack Park restrooms. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Postpone the discussion on the Jack Park restrooms until the Park has reviewed the future of Jack Park. 4 dj/166 :z. CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON • COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM §tgM1ARY . AGENDA OF: July 28, 1986 AGENDA ITEM M. -- DATE SUBMI11'ED; July 26, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Park tour June 17, ISSUE/AGEMA TITLE: Jack Park 1986. restrooms PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton REQUESTED BY:. Elizabeth Newton DEPARTMENT MEAD OK: AM CITY AOM UNISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION StMMRY During the June 17, 1986 park tour, some concerns were expressed about the condition of the restrooms at Jack Park. Staff has Hone some research into the options available to the City. Attached is a memo which outlines the procedure necessary to remove the restrooms and a memo which outlines the costs to restore the restrooms. • ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1.) Direct staff to request permission from the Federal Bureau of Recreation to remove the restrooms. 2.) Direct staff to proceed with the restoration of the restrooms. i t � axiom - } SIKXiEsf'—T'E!D ACTIOI�f Direct staff to 'request permisssion from 'the Federal Bureau of Recreation to remove the restrooms. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council July 24, 1966 FROM: Planning Staff MA SO8JECT: Jack Park restrooms During the June 17, 1986, tour of the City's park facilities some concerns were raised about the condition of the restrooms at Jack Park. As a result of those concerns staff has researched the City's options concerning those facilities. Because the restroom$ were constructed in part with Federal Grant, the City must obtain permission from the Federal Bureau of Recreation to tear down the facilities, The Bureau of Recreation requires that the City submit a letter to Al Cook with the Oregon State Parks Department requesting permission to tear down the facilities if that option is chosen. The letter must contain the estimated cost of restoring the facilities and a statement that the Council has directed staff to request perei'sMon to remove the facilities. Obwiously restoring the restrooms is also an -option, as outlined in the attached memo the estimated cost for restoration is approximately $14,039.00. At this time staff requests Council direction as to how to proceed. Staff's recommendation is to request permission from the Federal Bureau of Recreation to remove the restrooms. 2657Pldmj 27 UTI, u, a: I M ! M t! R A N D +t T • Bill Monahan FROM,; Jerry maurlin �mimAq D1%WR% ORE{'.(-,!, SUBJECT: Jack Paris Restroom DATE: July 22, 1986 i . I This is the estimated coat to repair the restrooms at Jack Park. The materials that will be used is as Vandal Proof as we can obtain. It is the same t ype .that is used In jails and Federal Parka. Toilets (3) S 2.250.00 a Urinal (1) ' 698.00 • Sinks (4) 1,188.00 Asad Dryer (1) � 327.00 Partitions 2,026.00 , Roof (steel) 6,000.00 Freight 350.00 Y iliac. 1,200 00 TOTS` $14,039.00 _ a CC: Liz Newton T Curtis Spann i File lam SalK ASH BOX 2339? TIG.ARD OREGON 97223 - - wu.;..e s. �, s�,i,•:;;„ ,cit .�` �'"" 4ua��?iii" C� � � � .: RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING: 8:05 PM 9. fjDNgENT MCEMM: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 9.1 Approve Council Minutes - July 16, 1986 9.2 Receive and File: a Community Development Land Use Decisions b Fiscal Year 86-87 Work Plans c Departmental Monthly Reports 9.3 Adopt Findings - Irvington Moore Temporary Use 9-86 - Res.N 86-83 9.4 Amending Findings - Graymore SDR - Resolution No. 86-84 9.5 Approve Transportation Committee Appointment - Res. No. 86-85 9.6 Approve Intergovermental Agreement With Washington County For County's Transportation Plan Update 9.7 Approve Delinquent Bancroft Alternatives 9.8 Approve City Administrator's Review Criterion For Special meting of 8/4/86. 9.9 Approve Call For Public Hearing On 9/8/86 - Kneeland Estates Utility/Roadway Easement Vacation 'ry 9.10 Approve Appointments of Acting City Recorder 6 Finance Officer a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Johnson to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 10. A ITEMS: From Council and Staff 10.1 Jack Park Options F a. Community Development Director stated that staff has done some research into the options available to the City for addressing the concerns regarding the restrooms at Jack Park. Staff may be able to request permission from the Federal Bureau of Recreation to remove the restrooms or the restrooms could be restored. He requested Council direction. b. Consensus of Council was to have staff study options and report back. Councilor Edwards requested the Council discuss the options with the Park Board at that time. 10.2 American Legion OLCC Application a. Acting Recorder requested Council approval for the American Legion OLCC Application for a one day permit at Cook Park on August 17, 1986. b. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve. 77 Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 4 = COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 28, 1986 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON 1 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM S1N"y'IARY toa5 ` AGENDA OF: Se tember 22 1986 DATE SUBMITTE D: Setgember PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: r 1 re ion Role PREPARED BY: Wok 1 Pro O a Y ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: WA�i DEPT HEAD OKM POLICY ISSUE Should the City contract with a park plans consultant to complete the Park Plan? INFORMATION SIARY City The Park Board has requested that theCtoncompleteauthotheeexpenditure f City Park Plan $10,935 to pay a consultant, Deborah Knechtel, please note that the attached time lines are draft only. The work program will be modified with input from the Park Board. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Authorize the hiring of Deborah Knechtel as contractor to prepare a park plan. 2. Take no action. FISCAL IMPACT The expediture would reduce the available contingency by $10,935. SUGGESTED AMON The staff suggests that the Council authorize the Director to contract with Deborah Knechtel to complete the park plan. dg/167 Kx _ e i f" l- MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council 1,^, FROM: William A. Monahan, Community Development Director DATE: September 15, 1986 RE: Park Planner Position During the Park Board/City Council workshop this summer, the Board suggested that a planner be hired to complete the park plan. My staff evaluated our options and determined that Liz Newton, Senior Planner, can spare sufficient time to supervise a consulting planner to complete the plan in nine months. We have tentatively agreed to terms with Deborah Knechtel to complete the study in nine months, through June of 1987 for the sum of $10,935. _ ' Park Board Chairman Dan Graham has met with Deborah and Liz and outlined his goals for the project. I expect that the Board will meet with the consultant throughout the year and review segments of the plan. I request that the City Council authorize an appropriation of $10,935 from contingency to allow the Department of Community Development to continue with Deborah Knechtel to complete the Park Plan. a CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES A CONTRACT entered into between the CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon 972:23 (herein known as "CITY") and Deborah Knechtel, (herein known as "PARKS PLANNER"). WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the CITY to retain the services of a Parks Planner to prepare a plan for Tigard's park system; and WHEREAS, Deborah Knechtel is qualified to perform said services; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED BY THE PARTIES HERETO THAT: I. The PARK PLANNER shall perform the services as set forth in the Work Program (Exhibit A), consistent with the target completion elates (Exhibit B), copies of which are attached to this agreement and incorporated by this reference herein, as modified by this agreement and shall perform the services pursuant to the Park Planner nature of work. 2. In consideration of performance of all services and as payment for all expenses incurred by the PARK PLANNER, EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY AGREED IN WRITING TO BE SEPARATELY REIMBURSABLE, CITY agrees to pay to the PARK PLANNER: An amount based upon project completion performed during the period from September 15, 1985 through June 15, 1997, a project cost of X10,935. 3. CITY shall make nine monthly payments to THE PARK PLANNER, based upon project goal completion, 4. THE PARK PLANNER acknowledges that for all purposes related to this agreement, THE PARK PLANNER is and shall be deemed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of CITY, shall not be entitled to benefits of any kind to which any employee of the CITY is entitled and shall be solely responsible for all payments and taxes required by law; and furthermore in the event that THE PARK PLANNER is found by a court of law or an administrative agency to be an employee of the CITY for any purposes, CITY shall be entitled to offset compensation due or demand repayment of any amounts paid to THE PARK PLANNER under the terms of this agreement, to the full extend of any benefits or other remuneration THE PARK PLANNER receives (from CITY or a third party) as a result of said finding and to the full extent of any payments that CITY is required to make (TO THE PARK PLANNER or to a third party) as a result of said finding. 5. THE PARK PLANNER shall prepare and submit to the Community Development Director, and the Finance Director, a monthly statement of services rendered, indicating hours and dates of services together with a request for payment. Payment by CITY of an interim amount shall release CITY from any further obligation for payment to THE PARK PLANNER for services performed or expenses incurred as of the date of the statement of services. . Page 1 r u s 6. Commencement and Termination: This agreement will commence on September 15, 1986 and terminate on June 15, 1987. This agreement may be cancelled and terminated for any reason upon written notice of thirty days by either party. The CITY may terminate the agreement at any time should the PARK PLANNER fail to perform the duties required without prior written authorization from the Community Development Director or all funds budgeted for this professional service contract are expended prior to June 15. 1987. Any work performed by the PARK PLANNER up to the point of termination shall become the property of the CITY. 7. Any modifications to this agreement resulting increases of compensation or extent of services must be made in writing. AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES HERETO: CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 6y: (Signature) R. W. Jean TITLE: City Administrator DATE: By: (Signature) Deborah Knechtel DATE: WAM-briY9 Page 2 1i+ .a..,r,=s.;:.-vr 4 i e PARK PLAN TIMELINE September - Over-view of City Parks October - Completed over-view of City Parks - Individual Park Pian: - Fanno Park November - Individual Park Plans: - Summerlake Park - Jack Park - Ye Old Windmill Park December - Individual Park Plans: - Cook Park - Woodard Park t - Main Park January - Individual Park Plans: - Greenway - Englewood Park - Liberty Park February - Individual Park Plans: - Bikepaths - Recommendations for future parks - Budget committee plan March - Strategies for development and improvements Prioritizing of Captial Improvements for parks - Budget committee meeting April - Opportunities for volunteers (rough) ^4 May - Park Plan Review and revisions June - Completion of Park Plan and Adoption dj/167 PARK PLAN I. Over-view of City Parks A. Background 6. Existing situation/inventory C. Standards II. Individual Park Plans - Existing A. Description and Standards B. Objectives and Goals C. Map and layouts O. Equipment needed 1. recommendations and costs 2. guidelines for new equipment and layout III. Recommendations for future development A. Site selection B. Objectives and goals C. Map and layout possibilities Q. Equipment needed IV. Strategies for development A. Land acquisition 1. development of private land 2. Use of public land B. Funding program V. Opportunities for volunteers A. gift list dj/167 CITY OF T'IGARD, OREGON 00UNCI1. AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 22, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 15, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE; Director's PREVIOUS ACTION: Decision PREPARED BY: Elisabeth Newton DEPT HEAD CITY ADMIX (W REQUESTED BY: City Council POLICY ISSUE INER MlATIC1N SUMWY. Y There were no Director's Decisions issued during the meek of September 15, 7985. a ALTERNATIVES ConwftR EDED = FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESM ACT IM CITY +OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUi'R!lARY J AgENDA OF: °September :22 1986 AGENDA ITEM :#: '7 DATE -SUBMITTED: September 710, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: 1'SSUE/SDA TITLE: Monthly Report must- 19eti Community ,Development PREPARED BY: W. A. 'Monahan REQUESTED BY: OlEpARVIEXT DEAD OK: yCITY °ADMIWISTRATOR INFORMATION SUMMARY *tta,-shad :please find the Monthly Report for August, iS86 prepared by the 8ep'artr*Arrt of Community ;Development. ALTS- TIVES gMI©ERED ww place in file. SUGGESTED -f T M owcept and place anfila. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Members of the City Council September 10, 1986 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development SUBJFCT: Monthly Report - August, 1986 During July, the Department of Community Development was involved in each of the following areas: - Building permit issuance was high again. The attached comparison year to f date permit activity illustrates that 323 single family permits and 122 multi-family permits have been issued. - Building permit and plan check fees have exceeded those collected during calendar year 1985 ($244,826 compared to $241,870). Fees collected are $75,393 over the same eight month period in 1985. - Capital projects are on track. A separate report from the City Engineer t was presented on September 8, showing the status of each project. The 68th Parkway LID was completed and officially opened. - Codes enforcement is under better control than during recent years. During August, 23 now cases were opened and 19 closed. Overall, since hiring George Steele as Codes Enforcement Officer, 129 of 149 cases opened have been resolved. - Business tax revenues continue to trend well as a result of a stopped-up notification and enforcement. Since June, $6,875 has been collected by the codes enforcement officer contacting businesses which had failed to renew their 'business tax. In August, $1,950 was collected. Half of all businesses sent a notice since the enforcement effort began, (152 of 305) have since complied. Anotyher 20X (68 of 305) are no longer in business. - Playground equipment at Cook Park was installed. During the summer, many improvements were made to the park including street paving, increased cleanup and mowing, and correction of safety concerns. Street -markings were installed throughout the Main Street area as well as school areas. Operations crews tore back on 'their regular work programs, having -completed several capital projects. The iannexation of 'the remaining e.portionsof.Durham Road was completed at the Council level as wall as -19 acres of '.land under option to the <Alber^tson'Corporation. ;(VAM br-l09SOP) ' BUILDING SECTION - AUGUST COMPARISON Following is a comparison of building activity for August of 1985and1986: August. 1985 August, 1986 Single Family Permits 24 53 Multi--Family Permits (units) 0 16 commercial Permits (neo) i 1 Building Permit Fees $ 11,042.17 $ 25,542.70 Plan Check Fees $ 5,928.31 $ 14,529.12 Plumbing Permits $ 4,645.00 $ 6,195.00 Mechanical Permits $ 930.50 $ 1,317.00 Valuation $2,221,800.00 $5,634,200.00 Jan. - August 1985 Jan. -_August 1986 Single Family Permits 186 323 Kilti--Family Permits 338 122 Coam+ercialPermits 10 17 Building Permit Fees $ 120,433.67 $ 159,150.86 'Plan Check Fees $ 43,999.21 $ 85,675,20 Plumbing Permits $ 64,737.28 $ 46,995.40 fte finical Permits $ 6,888.00 $ 9,044.50 Valuation $31,004,299,00 '$37,006,474.00 (br/O950P) Y to f a+ .e M .+ .� �4 N m .e UI N N O N O O M3' O d O O O O O C O M et ae m In A mI n �w m O w m A M M Q r0 M w M N N N N N to .q M .t' d N M f' d N e4 O 8 w w _ C.O 8 8 8 th 8N 8S 8 8 8 8 2 8 _ . moN l on r M .i .4i N .a to 0 to O M w A.1+ N.�tN,e� t.o.i u�►� eAnc N m Yf� aA PN Oh ehde �As pp�qOp� S4 8 p g 8 8 mao+�•wO In- e4 `an .r A n M A tM0 A i in d -4p .we � V. .Or M m n M O • '..7 w' .n A A mtt1 d to M tMo M IND .Me C4 w C� O a n n awn in b M w A ane t0 M+P - r+ ttt w w h m d d g 8 g 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a g10 8 �O sn d tH to a+ O h f m N M to d A d �► n s m m M in 8 -8 8 °8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 H « S N S QQ S p QQ 1q� pO h O _.�, w d ,!q O dp ` .tp of ..wt` t0 t N .•i O - O I.: w Q� t� pfe '.w.a � a - 1e `O t ,:N- ,� ,.amn h n O 8 --wwO :C4 M ':M ,'.w N tp Nf to • � u Go AIlk u i4i4 tT C ~ a O Z O 1'f la. pL T !t Dt\ LL :.� _> c� .. hh31 :M. s O 'y s� .i �D Q' .• M Nf tD h A .Oi .+ .a N N co m N N N N O %D a `a w=�111 N M M In M M M M r' 4 ♦ f M M M M M M to M M M 4" M yi .t U1 N tD f < A h A N to ut .• f A l4 .s •y p� •► M .+ M tD m + at h M W N rt WN a ar 5 .� N �O w .• .� .� .r N N N N ..a .r .i N N M a W O o .• +� N w e w M N M w 4110 M t0 .. of a f v8 a M Q n o tsi t0 of h f • h tti ! .t •a to A i N h tD f iin N ..tit O h P O 1 w N ah ♦ i to tD h iR Olt .n N M ♦ to h A a40 . A 1 N pp i m • w i a • a w p O p �j O Nw N N h A N N 001 iil 8 Sit f tl► dt ! ? (' _ til h !► < N h N h OA a F N +OtN1 N O N Q h h O tRf N .tP. N M h tDA h M8 a A -4p M OO AA N .q q ♦ rp tD O ♦ m 0; tD m ! N m N h4 O tD a .. N lrl fD U! tp tp t0 A A to .+ .a N N ft ♦ < d1 . O h A M W 1 w N tD O N •• w N N tD i cc) tti N tD O N o M M W 1 A t!! A tD A M Q M N A t0 t0 N !l11►►►e h Ot m !► w A w wt Oatf V# g M M M t► +p h M 4 N m to A O a ^ to A W *D m m A t0 .r tD t0 N N h M a tD to i f h h rt tD N t0 �+ aA f w .4 N M Mf t tlml tD N M f to h W 8 O 8 tll lit $ � � •hi .wi b �b td! to t4 a t4 94 h :°, O .+ M OOP OV w .+ a M An to w M m o ttl N to r O A to to .+ ! .n f < W M O A d1 �. ob O a affil NM At Q O N wt M w o tD M v 1if • a p N si C N ? tD O MI A O M 1n to tD M f iD w O M d1 O 8 8 0 0 0 O 8 8 S O 8 O O 8 O 8 -8 8 8 a0 O f A A O► A A A ! O H ttf M tf1 f ! ♦ df N A 0!t A A - ! -' N A N .4 M A M 1� h 01 h • w f� .tet ! ! N h n w M A A d .+ a N f .1?3!N11i i f tD A "tD Q N .0 ! N to N O .+ f,.' �.4 N N �tpQ S w to rD N �O .+ .t Ot M N h S .t A f A O t1f A O M .� A 23 h < h M f N M ..4t .int ha N, N tiV M A A do f N tD A .+ Ai .mi N 4" M � L !► L L -S i i ic .. w i 6 D C ` p 0► d 7 s L r M: MEMORANDUM / CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO; Mayor, City Ca cal, a City ministrator August 20, 1986 FROM: Chief Lehr - SUBJECT: July, 1986 Monthly Report During July several significant events occured in the police Department. The most challenging event was the establishment of the Entry Level Eligibility List. On June it, the Department conducted a physical fitness test for police applicants. This test is age and gender validated and measures cardio—vascular and orthopedic fitness. It is departure from the traditional agility test. It is our belief that if a person has an acceptable level of physical fitness we can teach him/her the appropriate physical skills to do the job. We were fortunate in that the Portland Community Collage taff support to conduct the test. On the 8th provided us with facility and s _ and 9th, Helen Terry conducted a training program that resulted in the police Department having 21 trained assessors. Eight of these officers acted as Assessors in the entry level Assessment center conducted the 23rd, 24th, and 25th of July. Ms. Joanne Cowell also acted an assessor representing the commrunity. Her participation was a positive experience for her and there was a great deal of acceptance of her role by Palace department personnel. An eligibility list of 12 persons has been certified. I had the opportunity during July to moot with Sheriff Probstfield to discuss b the level of cooperation within the law enforcement community. He shared with me his concern about the lack of interagency cooperation. The Department assisted in the successful Cruisin' Tigard event on the 26th. In conjunction with CruisjW Tigard the Police Department conducted it's annual auction. The Auction grossed $2,596.75 and resulted in most held vehicles stored at Public Works being removed. Our goals for August include conducting the SRO Assessment center and getting rational and co the SRO opempleting the 2nd phase of recruit selection so that the able to hire SRO replacement officers and the 2 new authorized officers ' weby September 1st. -DL•bs1SO -- TIGARD POLICE DEPARTWEDi JULY 1986 Monthly Report I. Calls for Service: This Month 1,374 A. Obligated Time 1,978.1 e. Non-Obligated Time 385.4 II. PART I CRIMES No. Cleared Arrests A. Haucide � 1 — B. C. Robbery 1 — 1 1 D. Aggravated Assault 1 1 E. Burglary 17 4 5 Residence 6 ) Non-Residence 11 ) F. Larceny $1 21 22 G. Auto Theft 3 3 2 H. Arson 1 „= TOTALS: 106 32 31 PART I CLFhRANCE RATE: 30.2% - III. PART II CRINES No. Cleared Arrests A. Simple Assault 10 6 8 S. Forgery 3 C. Fraud 10 2 D. Embezzlement ' E. Stolen Property 1 1 F. Vasxklism 36 3 7 G. Weapons F H. Prostitution i 1. Other Sex Grimed _ �.2 ._ J. Dr g Abuse Y K. C,a:nbling x L. Crimes Agst Family 1 M. D.U.I.I. 2 2 1 rr N. Liquor Laws 2 2 2 O. Dissarderly Clonduct 2 1 P. Kidnap 1 Q. All Cather 8 6 12 R. Curfew 6 6_ �— S. Runaway 2 2 TO►P.AI.S: 35 PART II C ZAPANCE RAZE: 36.4% IV. TOTAL PERSONS CHARG®: 66 V. MI5 SERM: 5 VI. 70MAL pfCpERTy I $ 70,735 TOTAL PFdN22 TY PIXX74ERM: $ 31,548 VII. TRAMC: A. Accidents investigated 26 Injury Accidents 7 Fatal 0 B. Cid :37744 Haza x1ous 216 Non Hs zardaus 15$-- C. D. Index: 30.85 ar* MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor Council September 11, 1986 FROM; Doris Hartig - Deputy Community Services Director SUBJECT: August Monthly Report With the conversion to monthly sewer billing. the billing and collection time has tripled. Temporary help is being used several days a week to cover the Increased workload. The audit is progressing smoothly and the auditors should be out of the office by early September. Seven finalists have been invited to participate in the community services asses aant canter on September 13, 1986. One candidate lives in Colorado, and withdrew his application. The other six are Oregon residents. Recruitment for the Finance Director position has begun. staff has been preparing tentative floor plans to adjust the floor space to ac date the depar=tments reorganisation. Word processing and lmicipal Court had em Ployees on vacation and work load indicators are down. The City Recorder spent considerable time reviewing election procedures with Council candidates and coordinating the Metzger } square pre-election work. WORK LOAD INDICATORS Aug. '85 Aug. '86 Expenditure Reimbursement Bequests Processed * * 95 Purchase Orders Processed 69 81 Recruitments 7 1 Hires 5 5 Terminations 3 1 Uneployment Claims 0 0 Claims filed: Workers Cowensation - Strained muscle - Bldg. Paint in eye - P.W. Streets Poison Oak - P.W. Parks 1 3 Liability (see attached report) Checks written: Accounts payable 200 394 Payroll 222 296 8ewsr Payment Received 1851 2653 Sewer Bills Sent 1655 5215 Hams, Address, Changan 209 223 Cash Receipts 669 732 Word Processing Work Orders Received 145 230 ftergency Requests 46 81 ?*Sox Processed 9751 6875 Average Turn Around 5.8 bra 8.75 hrs Telephone Calls 5665 10.591 Walk-ins 2123 volunteer Hours 0 0 * * information not available i!![/ial i . n - T 9/10/86 CITY OF TIGARD CLAIM STATUS REPORT DATE OF LOSS CLAIMANT DESCRIPTION STATUS 2/13/85 Mervin Soen False arrest pending 8/21/84 George Kusiowski Ins. impounded clt's car no activity (Officers Johnson, Ober, 6 Newman) 2/4/85 Fredric Nickel Criminal counter cplt. open (Officer Hal Merrill) 3/20/83 Fred Ozan False arrest Appeal Filed (Officer Killion) x, 1/11/85 Harry Field Alleges False Arrest pending fi (Office Merrill) 7/20!85 Steven Bacon False Arrest (Officer Harburg) claim reopened ti 3/16/85 Julie B. Winkelman Wrongful Death pending 10/16/85 Opal Kaska Failed to yield right--of-aay 100% recovery from other party 12115/85 icon i Peggy Cole Loss of jewelry — stolen Reopened r� after insured had possession 7/3/85 Sui—Thank Van Insured hit claimant pulling Insured: $2,530.66 out from stop sign Claimant: $3,570.33 Add'l. payment at $168.01 to claimant 4/5/86 John Hutchinson Trees cut on private Pending property 7/25/86 R.A. Cutshall Bike hit cable in park path New claim 1/31/86 David Fain Police negligence Open 4/6/86 Scott Fairbanks Code Enforcement negligence Open e (0886F/OD19F) TO: LIBRARY BOARD CIIYOF TIFARD CITY COUNCIL FUN: LIBRARY DIRECTOR OREGON SUBJECT: MONTHLY REPORT, AUGUST 1986 25 Years of SeMce 1961-1986 WCCLS: The Structure and Governance Committee met twice and is considering the issues involved in forming an "ideal" model. 'A special study committee reported on the issue of autonomy. Steve Rhodes, Tualatin City Administrator, presented his "cooperative" proposal which would amend the present Library District statute to allow formation of a library district by intergovernmental agreement. (Minutes of these meetings are available for more in-depth explanation of discussions.) Automation: Volunteers and library staff worked through August 29 entering and modifying holdings in the data base. The information has been sent for production of "smart" labels. All other holdings will be entered and modified using dumb labels following completion of "smart" label project. As of August 21, Tigard had added or modified 15,269 records out of 31,205 holdings. The final total should be nearly 20,000. The plastic, universal user cards will be available in October at which time the patron registration will begin. Presently we are able to do inter- library loan with several counter libraries via electronic mail and we can check the data base for holdings in all other public libraries and some special libraries. Detection SZstem: There is a problem with the sheet rock covering the detection t _ posts. It cannot be adjusted for optimum detection without causing other problems. The matter is being discussed with the architect and 3M, the installer. Shelving: It was discovered that all the flat metal shelves had been installed backwards. All books were removed, shelves were reinstalled and all books replaced. This required 2$ days. Installer accepted responsibility. Patrons complained of noise and disruption. Volunteers: Forty-one volunteers gave a total of 502 hours; daily average 20 hours; staff time 11.75 hours. One co,smunity service assignee worked 5 hours; staff time, 10 minutes. Library Board did not meet in August. Personnel: Three aides were hired to replace two who resigned and one who asked to, be pieced on call. Dianne Byrne, Craig Burgess and Carol Hausauer are temporary part-time to work 20 hours per week. Youth Services: Seven special programs were presented plus six story times. More than 200 children attended the end-of-summer party. Gaarde Christian School won the Summer Safari Grand Prize, a framed jungle poster. Friends of the Library framed the poster and paid for party refreshments. For June, July and August, 17,610 items were circulated; 630 participated in summer reading activities. 13125 SW Mall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 F TIGARD LIBRARY BOARD- MONTHLY REPORT - AUGUST 1986, page 2 , .Work Indicators: must 1986 August 1985 Adult Materials 6674 5914 Juvenile Materials 4865 3743 TOTAL, 11,539 9,657 Days of Service 25 22 Average Daily Circ 462 439 Hours of Service 209.5 204 Books per Hour 55 47 Increase/Decrease Circ +19% +12% m Referance/Reader's Advisory 323• 290 Books in use in Library 1534 625 Storytiaes (sessions) 134 (6) 52 (3) Special Children's Programs 322 (5) 35 (1) Materials Added/Withdrawn 397/0 358/125 Borrowers: New/Renewal 258/88-346 160/128288 ;A Y } 4 S fi j s _� zz z3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 22 1986 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: September 4, 1%6 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Agreement With State for Hall/Burnham Improvements PREPARED BY: Randall R. Wooley REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: k r� POLICY ISSUE Approval of an agreement with the State for signals and widening on Hall Blvd. (Beaverton—Tualatin Highway) at Burnham Street. INFORMATION SUMMARY The attached agreement provides for the State to install signals and a lQft�-turn lana at Hall Blvd. and Burnham Street. The City's cost will be $70,000which is the approximate cost of signals. A portion of the City's IP cost is funded by a Federal grant previously approved by tha Council. The Cf o budget approved in June includes sufficient funds for the City's share of costs under the agreement. x: zs� :3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to sign the agreement. 2. Direct staff to negotiate a revised agreement. 3. Abandon the project. SUGGESTED ACTION Approval of the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Recorder to z sign the agreement, (br/115) ;. s�� w APPROVED: L.E. GEORGE E ONE:bkb 8-20-86 Misc. Contracts & Agreements No. 8876 COOPERATIVE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION-FINANCE THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the STATE OF OREGON, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division; hereinafter offerrd totheeStateaof"Oregon, acting byjTY andOthro ghDits municipal corporation City Officials, hereinafter referred to as "City"- RECITALS 1. Beaverton-Tualatin Highway is a part of the State Highway System under the jurisdiction and control of City she treet system, underothe auris- and Burnham Street is a part of y diction and control of the City of Tigard. 2. For the purpose of providing acceptable traffic ci rculatioinstall ose patterns on public highway, the State and City plan traffic control signals and a left turn lane at the intersection of Beaverton-Tualatin Highway a^ $ his �pproximatelyhereinafter shoanreferred thego as sketch "project" Location of the project map attached hereto, marked Exhibit W, and by this reference made a part hereof. The project will be funded with a combination of City, State, and Federal funds on the following formula: a. of Interstateshall nTransfer(e)(4)te Ofundshandll includeCity match. ombination 0360) to eir ant b. sig9nal designtshallbbe�deductedhfromctheirttotalopreliminary $70.00O obligation. c. State shall match Federal Title II funds for a contribution of $60,000. d. State shall provide the unfunded balance, estimated to be $15,000. 3. By the authority granted in cities Rfrhe 366.770, the performanceofworkon State aginto cooperative agreements with the (~ certain types of improvement projects with the allocation of costs on terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the contracting parties. Traffic signal work on the project shall conform to the current state standards and specifications. 4. By the authority granted in ORS 487.850, State is authorized to determine the character or type of traffic control signals to be used, and to place or erect them upon State highways at places where State deems necessary for the safe and expeditious control of traffic. No traffic control signals shall be erected or maintained upon any State highway by any authority other than State, except with its written approval . NOW. THEREFORE, the premises being in general as stated in the fore- going RECITALS, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: STATE OBLIGATIONS 1. State shall , at City expense, conduct the necessary traffic investigations, identify and obtain the required permits, arrange for relocation of adjustment of any conflicting utility facilities, perform necessary preliminary engineering and design work required to produce plans, specifications and estimates, let the contract, furnish all construction engineering, material testing, technical inspection and project manager services. 2. State shall , upon completion of construction, perform and pay for all necessary maintenance for operation of the traffic signal at no expense to the City and shall retain complete jurisdiction and control of the timing established for operation of the traffic signals. 3. State shall compile accurate cost accounting records and furnish City with an itemized statement of actual costs to date, for periodic billings or at the completion of the project. The itemized statement will Include charges for State services including plans and specifications review, project monitoring and material testing. CITY OBLIGATIONS 1. City shall , upon completion of this agreement, deposit with State its estimated share of the cost of preliminary engineering services to be provided by the State. 2. City shall , prior to the State advertising for bids, forward to the State an advance deposit equal to the total estimated project cost less the amount of the initial advance deposit. Upon completion of the project and receipt from State of an itemized statement of the actual total cost of the project, City shall pay any amount which, when added to City's advance deposits, will equal 100 percent of the City's share of the actual cost of the project, including -2- preliminary and construction engineering, and all contingency items attributable to the project. will betrefundedsaid or releaseddtoosits City,which is in excess of theCity's 3. City shall forward to State partially completed traffic signal plans for State's use in designing the signals. 4. City shall , upon completion of the project, pay for 100 percent of the power consumed in the annual operation of the signal . 5. City hereby grants the State the right to enter upon and occupy City street right-of-way for the performance of necessary maintenance of the traffic signal equipment, including vehicle detector loops. 6. *, City shall maintain the asphaltic concrete pavement surrounding the vehicle detector loops installed in City street in such a manner as to provide maintainthepavementection markingsrhndisigningtor installed insshall talled accord with ly the plans and specifications. 7. City shall , without cost to the State, relocate, or cause to be relocated, all City-owned utility conduits, lines, poles, mains, pipes, and other such facilities located within or upon the right-of-way of a State highway under a permit issued by the Oregon Transportation Commission upon condition that the permittee will bear the cost of any relocation. r a. City shall adopt a resolution authorizing its designated City Officials to enter into and execute this agreement, and a copy of such resolution shall be attached hereto and become a part hereof. Y. -3_ a, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their seals as of ttie day and year hereinafter written. City has acted in this natter pursuant to Resolution No. , adopted by its City Council on the g,)L#-,cA day of , 1986. The Oregon Transportation Commission, by a duly adopted delegation order, authorized its Chairman or Vice Chairman to act in its behalf in approving this agreement. Approval was given for this agreement on which approval is on file in the Commission records. The delegation order also authorizes the State Highway Engineer to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. APPROVAL RECOMMENDED STATE OF OREGON, by and through (} its Department of Transportation, By Highway Division �+R�t{y+r� �•hA.a�.+1LR+r' .r ,1 By State Highway Engineer Date APPROVED AS TO CITY OF TIGARD, by and through LEGAL SUFFICIENCY its Elertfd Officials By By C" Assistant Attorney General y y _ Efwti+ Date By ' -� ty ecorder -4- • ".+ t Oar _�r h• ......r� 1 i • n SGUARE � F T! ARDInc •- *_ ,rt•wwu # •L, .' 1 •nc a Y�r►w f wr • «, ••�n4 nn p de/4w team Rw w -•K lsy w � � ��yY M p Y 116- s• • 1 � p• rrr { •.� � .www - VIP"ilk I f. n°.` • !•� a p •+r w � T • f - w s !, w wrw dtwls -Y.1 '.w��� .. Y GO 1WA WORK_ •�'� . ..ter . W rr ,;1:�=.�•.w .;.�r;� _r _ i• ,�:, �� EXHIBIT _A ;47 rn Y ` CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL NMA ITEM SUWARY [ AGENDA OF: September 15, 1986 AGENDA ITEM N: DATE SUBMITTED: September, 8. 12R6 PREVIOUS AMON: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ,,SERA, A C_onf== Request for Aovroval PREPARED BY: -- REQUESTED BY: e DEPARTMtNT BEAD OK: L � CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Should Council approve City Engineer to attend American Public Works Association (APWA) from October 22 to 24th. rx FORMATION SUMMARY C7City Engineer has requested to attend the APWA Conference in Newport, Oregon from October 22 to 24, 1986, for a total cost of $225.00. 's ALTERNATIVE$ CONSIDERED is . 1. Approve that the City Engineer attend the APWA Conference from October 22 to 24, 1986 for a total cost of $225.00. 2. Deny the City Engineer's attendance to attend the conference. 4 ) fi ®m �_ . _ $UOED ACTZt1N Staff. recommends':that the City Engineer be authorized to attend the,.APwA 'Conference:in Newport from October -22, to 24, "for a total cost-of'$225'.00. $5.p, .rr {h._ r MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON s TO: Mayor and City Council September 5, 1986 FROM: Randall R. Wooley, City Engineerop", SUBJECT: APWA Conference The Oregon Section of the American Public Works Association (APWA) will hold its fall conference in Newport on October 22 — 24, 1986. In the past, I have found A,PWA conferences to be quite beneficial. They provide practical training through technical sessions, along with an opportunity to exchange ideas with personnel from other cities. APWA conferences provide excellent, practical, continuing education in the public works field. The emphasis of the r^ihnicrl sessi^ne at this fall's conference is on management skills. I request approval of training costs for my attendance at the conference. The estimated cost of $225 includes registration costs, lodging, and travel expenses. (br115) t �, alYM MIFAW EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST f This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in yog pe sonnel it . DATE OF REQUEST: 91��k(c Requested by: 0e Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO• 1? [ ) Employee request attend �y '� [ ] Employer required attend For check run of ( j Mail check ( J Notify dept. when ready Vendor No.:__•___�� Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: PAYABLE TO: sssssssswesssssasssasssszssssasssmssassassazszssssasasssssss:sssamz:sssssaassssas Title of Program: ARM Institution or organization Registration Deadline 10 G/8lo Training Dates From: 101-97- To: 1044- Describe 0 ZDescribe the purpose: l /9PW.4 /f e'jm4,-e f6e• Is this related to [A--i-current position ( ] reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: 4Yl�/1tc�i�� ��Y!/�lld� / ✓� iSP� TRAINING CASTS: [ i<ti o be advanced [ '' to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition......................... . ebb/OD- '7 Books*.*........................................ Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.).... /D•ao/bp-h a SO__ Lodging............................ .............Per Diem........................................ . 4+ �t �7�d Other: Total $ � S s:sssassassmssssz:ssasmsassszsaes::amsmmszxssssssasszsasasa:zmasasmsasasasasmme Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training polici�;F are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expendit made my hal 1 Employee Signature: Date yA,/7" Appropriation balance:4�5-7, "ID Manager: [ j approved [ ] disapproved Dept. Head:�t [ approved [ ) disapproved (explain): Finance Director: OREGON Oregon Chapter APWA Mall Registration to: 1986 Fall Conference 1986 Fail conference APWA c/o Mike Eastman Entbarcadero City of Newport I ► Newport, Oregon 810 S.W.Alder { OCTOBER 22, 23 & 24, 1986 Newport,OR 97365 CoMeTenea Malatniglan Pro-Registration must be mailed on or before October 6, 1986 Delegate: 1 and ie kl'90/12U Organization: i OrF Te4Z?A� (taint naffie as you want on badge) Address P. 0--- 54?Z City 8c state: T� o? Guesfi s Name I Zip Code: !2709 '5 Please m iew.cuvf My.an lafmnatioa is the reglsirRtlon packet. WORKSHOP: -problems Solving Without Tears" Wednesday October 22 $46.00 x CONFERENCE FULL REGISTRATION(postmarked on or before 10-6-86) $75.00 x J— $—%5—' CONFERENCE FULL REGIS'LRAMON(postmarked after 10-6-86 or at desk) $85.00 x — $ Full Regliihv ion includes Thursday Lunch.Thursday Banquet. Friday Business Breakfast and Friday Awards Luncheon GUEST REGISTRATION(postmarked on or before 10.6-86) $40.00 x _.__ $ GUEST REGISTRATION(postmarked atter 10-6-86 or at desk) $45.00 x ,__-, $ Guest Registration tncludes 7hursda4Y Banquet,Friday Awards Luncheon and Com Breakfast on Thursday and Fridary. ADDMONAL REGISTRA71ON B is n.3-Day $35.00 x _,._ $ Basic F4g1stration,I-Day $20.00 x i $ Meal Tickets: 7hutaftIankh- $9.50 xMuneftBanipid Iii $$7.00 x $ Pfl t►Awards Luncheon $8.00 x $ Total Registration , vO- Full refund if cancellation is made prior to October 15. 1986. After this date a$20.00 cancellation charge will be assessed. SPECIAL AC11V1T1ES PACIFIC PAR M Breakers Open Golf Tourney. 18 Holes $20.00 x $ dra2e those who you want to be patted with) "Just for the Halibut: Fishing Trip.Wednesday.October 22 $40.00 x _ $ "Bottoms Up."Fishing Trip.Wednesday afternoon.October 22 $20.00 x _ $ For Cod's Sake.Catch Somethingl"Friday afternoon. October 24 $20.00 x _ $ Yaquina Bay&River Guest Excursion.Friday.October 24 $7.00 x _ $ Total Special Activities(nest be prepaid) ,f e/� (Poll reftmd will be made in trip is cancelledD MAKE ALL CMXXS PAYAMX TO: 1986 FALL XMAFWA Or*kW:Return to APWA—Canary:Regwants Copy } CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON / r COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY [/ AGENDA OF: September 15, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 19, 1986 7 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: APWA _ PREVIOUS ACTION: Conference Request for Approval PREPARED BY: E ineeri Serv. Mana e DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Engineeringg Serv. Div. POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Engineering Services Manager has requested that two senior Engineering Technicians attend the APWA Conference in Newport, Oregon from October 22 to 24, 1986 for a total cost of $599.76. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED F 1. Approve two Senior Engineering Technicians to attend the APWA Conference from October 22 to 24, 1986 for a total cost of $599.76. �^ FISCAL IMPACT $599.76 (A total of $750.00 was budgeted and approved in FY 86-87 for this event) r SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that two Senior Engineering Technicians be authorized to attend the APWA Conference in Newport from October 22, to 24 for a total cost of $599.76. mj/19 Gill( OF TIOARD ic�l low ul, r•.]In+t t , rraut r',•.l, :•. :'upJ �t I 1 :, I,i.t�,•u ,,, �u� ., ut I lilt.. !)itTL OF kn(JULS1 :�=15 ���� k, ,l „•,C�•,� '��: _f��P. Y .4 Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO, e' Ve L ( ✓fLinpi,, ,•• r.•yui•sL atteno ) Empluyet required attend For check run of _ J ( f mail chc•c•kk.-jevtJwv.4 f =,s » " evj r i 1 Nut , l, k-pt . whet+ ready Me Vendor No. : No. . PAYA}SLE 40: PAYABLE 1(): asa,¢xaasaaaaaaasaaiasaaxssx=zaxssxxssaxzcoaxc=naxmna=axxa=a:ax/=1a«xxoassmaasas«xx; Title of Program: .LZ tp It CU^TQ/ CA �•pwn Institution or organization � • Registration Deadline —�d- G- gre Training Dates From._,/p-tZ-iGTo: Describe the purpose: Is this related to ( A-1 current position ( j reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: TRAINING GOSTs: ( ✓fto be advanced ( j to be reimbursed after attendance Accc�outntt�No. fAmount v�i s t ra t i e n ;�r fit.i t i n n_-_-��Ot�..�.s�;/�!Ld4��� �••+LilftiLi:�Xa.r Books. . ... .... . .... . . . ......... .. ... .. Travel (mileage. bus, train, airplane, etc.)... . 1D Z2ZZ_ O Lodging........ ..... .... .......... ...... ...... .. ��-� O—if Per Diem................................... ..... Other: Total sssssassssssssssssssssamsssassasaasaaaasaa.saasaaaaa�saaasasessaassssasasssssssss Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expo:nditu wade on m behal Employee Signature: SA Date —11- Appropriation balanc —4000 Manager: approved ( ] disapproved Dept. Head: ( ] approved ( ] isapproved (explain): i 4 Finance Director: OREGONOregon Chapter APWA man 1966 Fait Conference l pis Qwf to: � t N Entbercadoro C/o Uite Eastman an aence APWA ewport OCT09ER 2�2,s 23 & on 24, 1988 S O 3.W Akkv OWPOEt OR 97358 P-re-Registration moat be mailed on or beton October 6, 19" Delegabm� k �0!t so ri (petint name as you wit an badge) OrSantzatson: C Address L.3/Z re,J Z1- Guesra Narzk-- citY A State' Zip Code: — S'722 3 mwi*wr.caretuVr.an kftr=atlm to the"glatratioa paw, WOMMHOP: 'i`rol=-0#0k1ugWIthmA 7UW Wednesday October 22—•--$45.00 C,'OO�di F� EGr.S-FUM N before las-e6) ;75.00aftz !„ a Full P49mrstion tachdea N �. mW or at dcs1� 185.00 z gam_. hursdAW HmakOk t and Gt7EST'I�r G�ISZRAM _PostmarW an or beforeGUESTate'1 8.88 ae• *-45.00 z BuxPletpudiwAvards a Lundw0°and l t n° Muned1w ' ADDMO •Yl On Bast IkOMUTC.,3-Day Bacdc l-D@V 190.00Mund Bmgta4 ------ *9.50 z =I'xas An=&Lmduon �9 WM 4&00 z TOM steam tZatim 1. � 111. 1995, After tlds date a"Moo ACnvrr= PACrAC PAR M ge"gert Open 00 _ OWN� w a�Motto w Hoke DO z t� 'for me r Tjb- 7br Cod's 00 x ftuu0M October Ste"meq►aPoeta000. October 24 .00 z y 00 z •,,,_ � _ ftmekm%Ph4►•October 24 WAXZALLCRW=PAYAWXTft IW ITAI& Iwo Q%kw:&tam to AIWA —Canmy:Itlab+wWo Copy CITU QF TIOARD f EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST 4 t'hts torm is to be used for conterences, seminars, college classes and other torms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is L..) bo attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A totlow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personne file. DATE OF REQUEST: —I 1--a&o Requested by: S. Vend..r No. : j PAYABLE TO: .#F'��� j ��A�� ( � Employee request attend [ ) Employer required attend a For check run of _ ( `]''Nail check 4o veN .o+- �•� ss "rf� ue �o s g7Mfg ( ] Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. : � Vendor No. : PAYABLE 'lU: �,,y/� � ?��_ PAYABLE TO: :sass assassasssssssmssossssanssassssasamcssssssas:ssssssssssssssssassaasasasassas Title of Program: / � ��I/ � �� A•P.u�.A. Institution or organization _ .�'s.gwj' :. . .. - Registration Deadline Ag-4.7,"_ 2 4.7," Training Dates From:AD-Z7-,SGTo:1p-L4=% Describe the purpose: is this related to 4 ✓1 current position ( ) reasonable promotion or transter'c Explain: TRAINING COSTS: -rto be advanced [ ) to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. ount _., Registration or fix.itlfln.. Books......... . .... . . . .. . . ..........0........... Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.)... !!!_22 f�7• �. Lodging... ..... . ..... ..... ... . .................. Per Diem........ .... . ........................... Other: Total S Z_1`I. seasssassesaassxssssx=s==sssassasssaswsssassssosssssssassawsssassaasaaosasssaaa Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not v t, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditure de o my alf. Employee Signature. Date Appropriation balanc Man Ser:_ approved ( ] disapproved Dept. Head: ( ) approved ( ) lsapproved (explain) : Fin:uu:c; 1)ir4L,rtor: :� OREGON Oregon Chapter APWA Mail Registration to: 1988 Pall Conference 1986 Fall Conference APWA Mike Eastman Embercadero Cityf N Newport, Oregon 810 S.W.Alder OCTOBER 22, 29 a 24, 1986 Newport.OR 97365 PwReglatratlon must be mailed on or before October 6, 1986 Delegate: a"... S. A/.*,,:,.. Organization: —� (paint name as you warltit on badge) Address /3/29-- . City A:State: Guest's Nam "AT Zip Code: 9'Z 2:7- Plesse se l+ew.carefully.an Information in the registration packet. WORKSHOP: "Problem Solving Without Tears" Wednesday October 29 $45.00 x e+� CONFERENCE FULL IMLSTRA77ON(postmarked on or before 10-6.861 $75.00 x CONFERENCE FULL.REGISt'RAMON(postma iwd after 10-6.86 or at desk) $85.00 x i Full Registration inn udes'htursday IAMCh.Thursday Banquet. FAD►;uadmms B udcOkst.and Frlday Awards IAMdIeM GUEST REGISIRATxON(poetwarked on or before 10-6-86) $40.00 it _ $ GUEST REGISI12AT3ON(postmarked after 10-6486 or at desk) $45.00 x — i Guest Edon indudas Thurs&V Banquet.FrldiiyAwards Luncheon and Continental Breakbat on Thursday and Friday. - ADDITIONAL REGISTRATION $35.00 x Basic 3-Day $20.00 x _ i$ Basic tea.I-Dap► Mea1'17e3aetmc L2 $9.50 x e i $18.00 x„j,. ice= FVIdWVAWardSIAWChM *8.00 Z J.- Rill rd r i kir - .r ..- kw to October 15. 1986. After this date a$20.00 SPECt -a PACIFI want Tourney. 18 Holes $20.00 xYOU to be patmd w#M i v -Just for the Halibut: FUhing Titp.Wednesday.October 22 _$40.00 x "Bono®a Up."Fishing Trip.Wednesday afternoon.October 22 $20.00 x For Cod's Sake.Catch Something!"Friday afternoon.October 24 $20.00 x _ i Yaquina Bay A River Guest Exicundon.Friday.October 24 $7.00 x _ i Total special AcUvftIM(angst be prepaid) -* ahtli refund vYM be made in trip is MABEAil.Cm PATAIKS TIM 1986 FALL APWA OrIOW:Return to AFWA —Canary:ftwranrs Capt AREA ZC®MN�[ISIt�N D ��suiuo�S 390 Beave , OR 97005-1601 •(503) 641-0218 12655 S.W. Genres Street / C September 4, 1986 TO: MACC BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM J. TIERNEY, ADMINISTRATOR FROM: SALE OF STORER METRO CABLE SYSTEM RB: ications, that I have been notified by Bill Bauce, n postponed until September 30. closing of the sale transaction has been Be insured me that the sale willcloseat cepa company because to has cover the letter of commitment fom an subordinated debt. blem The postponemener t presents a procedurlution al r which or commends consentKACC and the be the last jurisdictions. In our Res granted to the sale' MACC set a deadline certain4ev dance of complying jurisdiction acting for reementTidel � submit required a signed agreement with the Franchise Aould comply with the Franchise Agreement, a indicating that they sting of the We set this time certificate of sandrae evidence faithful their efinancing.bon , Po security fund, _29th. In preparing the frame anticipating that the e last forisJulyion to act would be on July 28, 1986 with the closing thin a reasonable time he resolution• the time requirementcam lied with withi to insure that all Franchise requirements were P which MACC or t - after closi9•wit van not ould reconsidernt to theirbapprovalline by jurisdictions s before The 45 day deadline falls on September 11,hahey have the respoh is now 19 nsibility closing. Storer has informed nts by iidel September 1986. Although Tidini nel y as to meet our requirements by the 11th, it is my op the member able to satisfy the require me date and by resolution it d be jurisdictions to recognize well as Dan Cooper s, that the new lclosing dvisable for is requirement. Althoug extend the 45 day requirh it could be argued that t action is not necessary, it is the safest course for us to follow- action gnclosed is a resolution for each juer►ddoftSeptember ion to act I hope each will be able to ac prior WJT/tmm Enclosure cc: Mr. Dan Murrell - Storer Metro Mr. William Bauce - Tidel Communications Press t.. 1 � . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 22, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 10, 1966 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approve Chief PREVIOUS ACTION: Approval of Chief of of Police Em to went A reement Police Employment Agreement Addendum PREPARED BY: Bob Jean DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OKK I REQUESTED BY: Bob Jean POLICY ISSUE Whether the City provides a fleet vehicle or vehicle allowance to the Chief. INFORMATION SUMMARY Ovcr the last several weeks a survey of the median market matrix cities was conducted. It is apparent that the total compensation package for the Chief of Police position was different from other cities in that they provide a vehicle for use by the Chief of Police. Either a vehicle should be provided or a vehicle allowance of $250/month be provided to bring the Chief's total compensation package within the median market policy as set by the Council. I have discussed the following options with Chief Lehr to resolve this issue: 1. assign a car from the existing police fleet for use by the Chief; 2. buy a vehicle for use by the Chief; or 3. pay a vehicle allowance of $250/mo. to the Chief. Chief Lehr has indicated the police fleet does not have surplus vehicles at n this time and suggested a vehicle allowance would be acceptable and preferable. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Pay a vehicle allowance of $250/mo. to the Chief of Police and amend his employment agreement as shown on the attached resolution. 2. Identify funding sources to purchase a City-owned vehicle for use by the Chief of Police. 3. Make no change and readdress the median market compensation policy for the Chief. FISCAL IMPACT 1. $3,000/year expenditure within the Police Department Materials 6 Services section of the budget. 2. $11,000 appropriated for purchase of a City-owned Police vehicle plus maintenance and operating costs for the fiscal year. 3. Subject to negotiation. SUGGESTED ACTION Motion to support alternative #1 and adopt the attached resolution. �'= lw/4157A s ,r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 86— A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AMENDING AN EXECUTIVE SERVICE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH DAVID C. LEHR, CHIEF OF POLICE. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds it appropriate to provide for a vehicle for use by the Chief at all hours for City business; and WHEREAS, the Chief ag�s to provide his personal vehicle for his use as Chief. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES014JED by the Tigard City Council that: Suction 1: The Employment\Agreement first entered into with David C. Lehr dated April 14, 1986, and ratified on August 11,` 1986, is hereby amended by mutual agreement of the partIps as follows' (language to be added is underlined): In SECTION 4 — SALARY,,VACATUM, AND OTHER BENEFITS: "E. Vehicle Allowance., a CITY shall vide 1,250 pqr month vehicle allowence to LOYEE who small provide his own vehicle insurance ocerlition and maintenance. EMPLOYEE shall rovide for oil and so ne within the Portland Metro area. City shall reimburs 7for Aesoline ex2anses on CitX business outside the Portla Metra a ." PASSED: This dyt of , 1986. Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST: Acting City Rdcordor — City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 86— 1w141rSTA ry _ MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO; Tigard City Council September 19, 1986 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director,''" Community Development SUBJECT: Tigard High School Building permits Tigard high School has conducted a class in Now Construction since 1980. They formed a nonprofit organization Called. Building Construction .Careers. Inc.. and as a part of the program, the students have constructed a new home each year. This has proved to be a great benefit to a number of High School Students, and they are ready to build another home this year. They are requesting that City st- The Council waive the per'a'®wer hook-up check and the tr�aeey tand ave iparke developmant school will Pay the charges. along with the plumbing and mechanical permits. C� Staff is recommending that Council waive the permit and plan check fees for the school again this year. /br136 �r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 22, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: September 22, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Adiustment to PREVIOUS ACTION: None Capital Improvement Program Pro ect List PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan DEPT HEAD OK i, --CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The storm drainage portion of the FY 86-87 Capital Improvement Program included the following projects: 1. New line for the Canterbury/Gaarde area; 2. New line for S.W. Murdock Street, and 3. Gentle Woods manhole and line repair, programmed completion priority for these projects is in the above stated order. Significant drainage problems in the Summer Lake/Anton Park area have created the need for a new project (see attached memo from Randy Clarno, Engineering Services Manager) . Staff agrees that the priority on this project is higher than projects 2 and 3 above. Staff requests that Council add the Summer Lake/Anton Park project as project 2 and eliminate current projects 3 and 2 (in that order) if sufficient contingency funds do not exist to complete these this year. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Add the Sumer Lake/Anton Park project as Project No. 2 (priority) and complete the Murdock and Gentle Woods projects only if sufficient contingency funds exist this year. 2. Add the Summer Lake/Anton Park project and eliminate the Gentle Woods and Murdock projects this year. 3. Do not add the Summer Lake/Anton Park project and assume potential property damage liability. FISCAL IMPACT 1. $0-$7,000 under alternative 1 and 2. 2. None under alternative 3. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that Council add the Summer Lake/Anton Park project and only complete the Gentle Woods and Murdock projects if sufficient contingency funds exist this year (Alternative 111). (br137) v MEMORANDUM CITY Of TIGARD, OREGON TO: William A. Monahan, Director, September 22, 1986 Community Development FROM; Randy S. Clarno, Engineering Services Manage SUBJECT. Summer Lake/Anton Park Storm Drainage Problem We are currently experiencing a significant drainage problem just south of the Meadow Creek Apartments, between the plats of Anton Park and Summer Lake (see attached map). This problem is primarily the result of a lack of coordination with storm drainage system development in the area. The problem consists of the lack of approximately 800 feet of storm drainage pipe to Summer Lake, forcing a significant amount of water to work its way through residential properties. flooding of landscaped properties and houses has occurred and sevaral complaints have been received. If this problem is not solved prior to the rainy season, the City could face significant liability claims. I strongly recommend we work to solve this problem soon. Cost estimates for the project range from $10,000 to $20,000 depending on the method of solution. These funds could be obtained by substituting this project for two previously approved projects, namely the "Gentle Woods" and "Murdock" projects. However, if Capital Improvement contingency funds are sufficient, I would recommend we just add the project to the overall program. if you concur with this recommendation, we should try and go to City Council on September 22, 1986 for the Capital Improvement Program project adjustment. Your earliest response is needed. cc; Jerry McNurlin, Operations Superintendent cc. John toy, Wastewater Crew Chief (br137) 1 . . 11�1� ■ : • t SEEM 46 MEN IN ON �'� �,■,� is