The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 05/05/1986 12 f TiFD71 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE`: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate ry BUSINESS AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, MAY'S, 1986, 7:00 PM ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 10865 SW WALNUT aksed to be 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON'97223 can be set for a future agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City `Administrator. 1. REGULAR MEETING: ; 1. 1 '-Call to order and'roll'call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call to Staff and Council for- non-agenda items: Motion to approve as amended 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 minutes or less, please) 3. EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION o Mayor and Council 4. ORDINANCE NO. 86- - Adoption of Si-86 Final Order o Community Development Director � a 5. PUBLIC HEARING -'ZOA 2-86 - NOTICE: REQUIREMENTS - HOUSEKEEPING o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations or challenges o Summation by Community DevelopmentStaff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents`, Cross Examination o Recofm=endation by Community Development Staff o Council questions or comments o Public Hearing closed a Consideration by Council - ORDINANCE NO. 86- 6. SEWER BILLING REQUIREMENTS - ORDINANCE NO. 86- 0 Finance officer 7. FEE CHANGE ORDINANCES 7. 1 BUSINESS TAR - ORDINANCE NO. 86- 7.2 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES - ORDINANCE NO 86- o City Administrator 8a. UPAA AGREEMENT o Community Development Director 8b. CAPITAL PROJECT/LID REPORT, 18 Month CIP o City Engineer 9. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and-separate action.. Motion to: 9, 1 Approve Council Minutes: April 21, 1986 9.2 Approve Fees & Charges Resolution No. 86- 10. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 10.1 OLCC'LICENSE APPROVAL - TAG May 16, 1986 10.2. METZGER RESOLUTION No. 86 11. EY.ECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Co-imcil will go into Executive Session under the prto`�i:siolrs or ORS 192.660 i 1)(d) & (h) to discuss labor relations and currentipendirig litigation issues 12. ADJOURNMENT lw/5-5-86 51 $ ; OWN WI Imw T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 L !N C Y REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 5, 7105 P.M. �. i. ROLL CALL: Presents Mayor John Cook; Councilors'. Tom Brian, Carolyn �4 Eadn, Ferry Edwards, and Valerie Johnson; city Staffs Hob lopment Jean, City Administrator; Hill Monahan, Community ?Recorder Director; ;Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Gerry Bowles, Reorder Protem. , 2. GALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a, City Administrator reviewed tfye updated agenda items, indicating the need for an executive session prior to consideration' of Item 6. � b. y Motion b Councilor Brian, seconded by councilor Johnson to approve, _ _ as amended. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present, 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA e a. The following people spoke in regards to S1-86s o Phil Pasteris, 8935 S.W. Pinebrook, Tigard, NPC 0, presented a � encompassing the NPCgs proposed nodific-Itions to Kneeland memorandum. Estates development as a result of their meeting on April 30. The NPC approved the proposed phasing-, e Sally Arroyo, 5505 S.W. Riverwood Lane, Tigard, distributed copies of a letter from the Audubon Society regarding the wetland issues. o Marrone Jenkins, 16465 S.W. 93rd ,Avenue, Tigard, presented a petition from residents of Kneeland Estates II. The issues of concern were part of the original appeal but were not all discussed because of time constraints. o Norm Harker, Alpha Sngineering, representing owner, had no objections to the items presented by staff and the neighborhood association. He was concerned about the safety of a meandering road from an engineering standpoint but this can be worked out with the City, Engineor• Phasing would allow them to begin work on four lots while obtaining the necessary 404 permit from Army Corps and meet the requirements of the Division of Stage Lands. o Kris Hdmna, reviewed items of aesthetic concern including frontage appearance and setbacks. The neighbors would be willing to maintain a footpath or greenway to gain gocess to Riverwood Lane, 4. EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION . May0r Cook announced the f011Owing es�plOyees to receive framed koys to the City far five years of services Lori HeVeny, Robert Harburn, and 'Rich; Peterson, Police Department; Liz Newton, Planning '0epartmOnt; and Walt Zielinski, Operations DepartMent. page 1 COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 5, 1986 b. Mayor Cook presented key plaques for ten years of 'service to Karrin Hawes, Library and Ed Walden, Building Department. Key plaques will also be presented to Robert Newman and Halbert Merrill, Police Department. C. Mayor Cook presented gold key plaqu0s for 15 years of v&rvicO to Robert Wheeler, Police Department, and Loreen' Wilson, finance DepartmentAlso to receive ;a plaque is Robert Thompson, Engineering Department. Adoption of 81-86 Final Order a. Comms nity Development Direct indicated that the final order was based on the original staff report. The NPO has since held a meeting and the results were entered as a Visitor's 'item. At the request ' of Council, the proposed modifications contained in the NPO's memorandum were reviewed. istrator indicated which concerns could be dealt with Citi Admin City�istr�tivel'y and not need to be made a part of the final order-.admi4 C. The consideration for phasic-10 was discussed with the necessity fnr requiring access off 33rd Avenue., d. ORDINANCE NO. 86-22 A F114AL Or IN THE;MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL REQUESTED BY LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN, FILE NO. C1-86, UPHOLDING T14E PLANNING COMMISSION APPPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS, ENTERING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS s Motion by Councilor Edwards, aecondbd by Councilor Brian to.approve. f. As a result of discussion of the NPO's concerns and Councilor Brian's request for modifications, Community Development Director recomm�nLed x the following conditions be added: 22. "Local Traffic Only" signs will be allowed at the entrance to the subdivision at 32nd Avenue. 23. The applicant shall create CC&P's compatible with adjacent subdivisions of Kneeland Estates and Copper Crook. 24. The applicant shall submit to staff for approval a rendering of a structure (for example:, but not limited to, a brick wall) and appropriate landscaping to indicate that a driver is entering a neighborhood. 25. Lots 6, 7, 8,- and 11 shall` be part of Phase I of the prOJOct, The current Condition 22 shall become 26 and Condition 23 shall become 27s Page 2 COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 5, 1986 r Condition '10 ohaill bG% modified to roads Double frontage:Lots 6, 7, 8, and 11 shall face 93rd Avenue :and be restricted to only one access each on same public roadway. 9• Motion by Councilor Brian, secan�Sed by Councilor Edwards to amend the conditions as stated above. Motion to amend approved by;a 3-0-2 majority vote of Council ,present, Councilors Eadon and 'Johnson abstaining because they were not familiar with former record. motion to adapt Ordinance No. 86-22, as amended, approved by a 3-0-2 majority vote of Council; present, Councilors Eadonand Johnson abstaining. h. Phil Pastoris questioned the placement of the greenway access path. The applicant agreed', to place a path if applicable. Community Development Director indicated that the maintenance and liability for the path would be covered in the ;CC&R9v. �. PUBLIC HEARINe -- ZOA 2-86 NOTICE REQUIREMENTS -- HOUSEKEEPING a. Public Wearing Opened. b. Community Development Director synopsized report indicating that Planning Commission 'recommended approval to bring the Code into conformance with Ordinance 86m-08. ca Councilor Johnson noted typographical errors in Section numbers contained in the item summary. d. Public Testimony - No one appeared to speak. e. Public Hearing Closed. f. ORDINANCE NO. 86-23 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTIONS 18.114.150, 18.120.090, ?6.�a4.0rs0, 17.149.080, 18.142.080, 18.144.050, 18.146.060, 18.148.040, and 18.162.070 Or THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO CONFORM TO ORDINANCE NO. 56-08. S g. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt. ' Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 7. BUSINESS TAX a. City Administrator reviewed the amount of increases and recommended approval. b. ORDINANCE NO96-24 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING BUSINESS TAX FEES' AND TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 5.04.160. Paige 3 COUNCXL MINUTES - MAY 5, 1986 h: �f 6' t ove. c, Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve- MOA. pP � d. Councilor Johnson expressed concern that the increase was tGG ' large without substantiation. e. City administrator explained that the tar, is used to subsidize the �. cost of police services to these businesses. + - f. Approved by a -p majority vote Of Council present, Councilor Johnson voting nay. a Second Ordinance will require reading. a �. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES a. City Administrator discussed tyPOs of projects funders from these changes. nmbile € eeand�Co�ymrcall�airsslutrialeand� inst�xtutional b. Councilor Brian reco home` court> space to s22 to $80. C. City Admini straor agreed to the, revisions and recommended approval. d, ORDINANCE No. 7 Alt{ ORDINANCE OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, AMEPlD"i11t3 ORDINAN .2i?.Cfs€3 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, STREET SYSTEM SECDEVELOPMENT CHARGESs— TRAFFIC CONTROL; AND PRESCRIBING NEW RATES OF CHARGES. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Eadon to approve with the chang*% in raters noted above. e. Councilor Johnson could not support as large an increase as 20% without supporting evidence. f, Motion approved by 1 majority vote of Council presents Councilor Johnson voting nay. Ordinance will require a second reaming. S. UPAA AGREEMENT a. Community Development Director distribtet�^d draft capias of the agreement, which will provide the mechanism to }candle concerns which have not been dealt; with in the past. b.' Council will take action on the agreement on May 12. 1C. CAPITAL PROJECT/LID REPORT IS Month CIP a. City Eninger distributed a graph depicting status of projects and highlighted major items of interest:: Page 4 COUNCIL MINUTES MAY ,5t 1986 si idered to be routine and may be enacted 11= CONSENT ABENDAs These items are co in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action Motion to: � 11.1 Approve Council Minutes: April 21, 198E 11.2 Approve Fees & Charges -`Resolution No. 86--32 i,. i. a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Johnson to approve 9.1 and hold 9.2 to be discussed at :the 5/12/88 meeting. Approved by unanimous vote of council present. 1'2. NON-AGENDA ITEMSs From Council and Staff L, 61, 12.1 CL,CC LICENSE APPROVAL � T�9Ci May 35, 1986 �. seconded b �. fiat i cin:by Councilor Edwards, Y Councilor Johnson to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 12.2 METZBER RESOLUTION a. City Administrator indicated that this resolution has been 'prepared at . , the request of the CPO to have the 'City declare its position. He reviewed the 5 sections contained in the resolution. b. RESOLUTION No. a653 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGONr � DECLARING THE CITY'S SUPPORT FOR THE METZt3ER/&iABNINGTCN SQUARE ANNEXATIONTO TIBARID c. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Johnson to approve. Motion 'o amend by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Johnson to revise wording in parenthesis in Section to reads (total new revenue less cost of City services in Na. 3 above = net revenue). Approved Lay _C-1 majority vote of Council present, Edwards abstaining. Nation, as amended, approved by a 4-0-1 majority vete of Council present, Edwards abstaining. 12.3 Councilor Brian recommended the Council adapt a resolution acknowledging the work and cooperation of staff from the beginning of the space need study, through the design phase, and the duration of the Civic Center move. RECESS OPEN MEETING& BW p.m. 18. EXECUTIVE SESSION& The Tigard City Council went into executive ` session to iation.discfpending liti g; z Page 8 .. COUNCIL. MINU'TE8 - MAY 5, 1986 E gigg , K t d t { k, 2 t C RECONVENE OPEN MEETING: 9.17 P.M. � M i' 14. SEWER BILLING REQUIREMENTS a: Finance Officer synopsized report. She stated that the Ordinance s would incur an interest _charge on delinquent accounts and establish a � p halt for accounts turned over to Washington County for collection. y b'. ORDINANCE N0, s-�, N t RDINANCE REPEALING THE SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FEE, APPROVING MONTHLY SEWER/STORM';DRAINAGE BILLINGS AND ESTABLISHING £ , i INTEREST AND FEN&TIES ON DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS � C. Motion by Councilor Briant seconded by Councilor Johnson to approve. d. Discussion ensued on the percentage rate set by USA. Councilor Brian suggested the City request USA to review the interest rate. e. Finance Officer, further explained the "billing prOcess: and the existing air e'^en76nt. f. City Administrator summarized the options. Continue the practice: and p, ask the County Board of Commissioners to act as the governing body for the Unified Sewerage Agency suggesting they review the rate; or b liable to USA for their share, subsidizing them from the City's s percentage of the'sewer billings. g. City Administrator suggested deleting Section 3 although it would J remain operative because it is currently in the agreement. There is s the possibility of a contingent liability. seconded by Councilor Edwards, to amend h. Motion by Councilor Johnson, motion to delete Section 3; thereby Section 4 renumbered to section 3. f. The consensus of the Council was to have staff pursue with USA the percentage interest rate before the effective date of ,Poly lg iSE.. Councilor Brian indicated that the City is obligated by agreement to h charge 18%. If no agreement for a reduced rate is reached with USA by g July 1, he recommended that Section 3 be added bacv into the Ordinance. : k. Motion to emend approved by a 3-2 majority vote of Council present, Mayor Cook and Councilor Eadon voting nay. Motion, as amended, approved by unanimous vote of Council present. RECESS OPEN MEETING: 9147 p.m. �r Page 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY u, 1986 won EXECUTIVE SS SEONa The Tigrar 2��aSo (1)�(d)1& (h)�to discuss�labor�rellations under the provisions of ORS and ccu rrent pending litigation issues' 12. ADJOURNMENT: 10-.45 p.m. Recorder 9 t1rotem � ago City of Tigard t Pao e 7 OQGRI CTL MINUTES fi7 � AY`S$ i�Q� TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY, Legal 6694 P.O.Box 370 PHONE(533)6E4.03£60 Notice G BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 �a Legal Notice Advertising a C i t y o f Tigard 1 Tearcheet Notice MAY - 51986 P.O, 'Box 23397` ID Tigard, OR 97223 0 Duplicate Affidavit OF TIGARD AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COVkTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' ing first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Advertising Director,,or his principal clerk, at the T--L. ard Times � a newspaper of general circulation as riefined4-en OR193.010 and 193:020;published at— Tigard —in the aforesaid county and state;that the Cit a;printed'copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire=issue of said newspaper and consecutive in the following issues: May :1.985 da.6*kdr i t_ eiore me this v a 3[ } 1996 AdAary Public for Oregon • My,Commission Expires: 9/20/88 AFFID"IT /20/88 I' ? � f tvz � e Phi l 'z ��7�sA3&�bi3'#i?�N"s�:.��•�� Faz3 p� / � 1 ar 4 r�'• sL s � _ lsi,��;+t-#€��.�,r �'x� a .n "k ''t ryr i j ow Y � �;7 fi�9 � 4 '�°�" .�,�. r f'�„ + �.ate„',;. .R•'F`�s' gp ap.,ys.' :"�°'... �.az' .,. ` ilk g t:x f3 '`yx •r rs6 't •'.' a., NMI= sm 1 51 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7--669x ' P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684.0360 Notice BEAVERTON,OREGON 97675 Legal Notice Advertising City of Tigard` 0 Tearshee3tNotice P.O. ` Box 23397 * Tigard, OR 97223 0 Duplicate Affidavit AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OFF OREGON, } COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, jsa. l_SteDhanier Neubauer being first duly sworn, depose and say that l am the Advertising Director,or his principal clerk,of the_5.3 g:�s d _ice tn� a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 133.020; published sit— Tigard in the aforesaid county and state;that the :. �� •onr'r7,1 Re�i�a ar NiQ .i'riLT�Jr7-�j �o a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was published in the entire issues of said newspaper f®r l successive and consecutive in the following issues: May :1, -1986 fsscribis and. vor ;; faeafor me ary€ubliic for Oregon r My Ocasnres3l s-3eaat Ex fsora�s`:' 9/20188 AFFIDAVIT HEARMNCZ {yj 1��'°EN'Itl S:F+�✓��j Tib r �, 1 N i �t 1 e, ` E fes•, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON l AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the matter of the Proposed a STATE OF OREGIChN County ofWashington) ss City of T' rd } Iree--ring first duly sworn. on oath depose and say. y That -I posted in the following Public and conspicuous places, a copy of 0rdirtA66Ii Number(*) -- 'which,were adopted at the Council Meeting dated h� �r � copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being herdtp attache and by rete nce de a .rt �reafr slaw the _ day of � 198 �t �ttyc, a �ic,�E4t �J2 � � liWcx � f aJ1U } �Z�4Cs,r(7tL1d^, ZLe Subscribed and aarovi er tar '-,-fare me thisf 4r1ay of t 009onNotary esfor My Commission Expa es: CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 4 ORDINANCE NO. 86-26 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE 'SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FEE, 'APPROVING MONTHLY SEWER/STORM DRAINAGE BILLI14GS AND ESTABLISHING INTEREST AND PE14ALTIES ON DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS. WHEREAS, the Budget Committee has recommended to City Council the repeal of the sewer line maintenance fee and the preparation of monthly billings rather than quarterly billings and, WHEREAS, ;our agreement with USA has an 18% interest charge for delinquent accounts after;30 days and, WHEREAS, the City loses 3% of revenue schen delinquent accounts are turned over to the tax assessor for collections, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council repeals the sewer line maintenance fee effective July 1, 1986. t SECTION 2: The City Council authorizes the transition to monthly billing July 1, 1986. SECTION 3: The City Council imposes a 3% penalty on all delinquent accounts that are turned over to the Washington County Tax Assessor for collection effective with the passage of this ordinance. PASSED: By unanimous vote of all. Councilmembers present after being read by number and title only, this 5th day of May, 1986. f een R. Wilson, LDpL"y- Recorder APPROVED: This 15th day of May, 1986 ohn E. Cook, Mayor ORDINANCE NO, 86-26 �a CII"Y OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE_ NO 86-,�f .) � AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTIONS 18.114.150, 16.120.090, 18.134.060, 18:140.060, 18.142_080, 18.144.080, ' 18.146.060, 18.148.040 AND 18.162.070 OF THE COvViUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO'CONFORM TO ORDINANCE NO. 86--08. WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its Community Dei elrjpment Code periodically to improve the operation and smplemc=_ntation' of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council revised the Community Development Code the the adoption of Ordinance No. 86-08; and WHEREAS, some sectionsof the existing Community; Development Code do not conform to Ordinance No. 86-38; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard 'planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment on April 8, 1986; arid WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on the proposed changes , on May 51 1996 THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS Section 1: The Community Development Crde shall. be amended as shown below. Language to be added in UNDERLINED. Language to be deleted is shown in [BRACKETS] Chapter 18.11.4.1.50(a) 3. ) Names and addresses within 250 feet. Chapter 18.120.090(a)(2) Change from [ZOO] to 250 feet. Chapter 18.134.060(a)(2) Change from [1.00] to 250 feet. Chapter' 18.140.080(d)(2) Change from [1001 to 250 Feet Chapter 18.142.080(a)(2) Change from [100] to 250 feet: Chapter 18.144.080(a)(2) Change from [too] to 25 feet. Chapter 18.146.060(a)(2) Change from [100" to 250 feet. Chapter 18. 148.040(x) (2) names and addresses within 250 feet. Renumber- 2 and 3. Chapter 18.162.070(a)(2) Change from [1003 to 250 feet. s, WE 1 -muffm WE : i:vi i I C u. Section 2 That this ordinance shall be effective on and after the 31st' 'day after its passage by the Council, and approval by the ,.. May o r. PASSED: By LAr-)C-rnia')tcu-'s vote of all Councilmembers present after being read by number andtitle only, this _ day ofYY1 1386. Lorean R. Wilson. DQputy Recorder (APPROVED: This � � day of V 1986. ).6hi-r E. _Cook, Mayor v' (2505P) ORDINANCE NO. 86- 5IR y' r- y h y' K� a '• -.. Cll'Y OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. ( A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE APPL.ICA"1100 FOR R PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL RE¢UES I ED ,BY LINCOLN SAV3:NGS AND LOAN, F II_.E NO. i = 86, UPHOLDING [HE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS, ENTERING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS W"EREAS„the Tigard City Council heard the above application at it's Regular Meeting of April 14, '1966 ,in a review of the Planning Commission action of March 4, 1996. The applicant was represented by norm Harker of earing in opposition ,were David Hamer, Alpha Engineering. AppSally LeRoy, ,Dan Mangelli and Dan Leslie and: Phil Pasteris representing NPO fib, Iere Council finds the following facts in this matter': WHEREAS, the applicant applied for preliminary plat approval for an 18 lot subdivision,': on an 8.68 acre property On the west and east side of 92ndAver-suesouth of Kneeland Estates LI (Wi:lfl 2w1 14A, T:x.. 900) WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning c::or:mission conducted a hearing on this martter on March 4, 1986. The Commission voted to grant preliminary plat approval of 81-86 subject to cUndi.tions. The information supporting the applicant's request, the record of the nea.r•in(3, .and the final order of the Planning Commission are found in Planning File Number 51--86; arid, WHEREAS, on March 10, 1986, the application was appealad by the record before the Neighborhood Planning Or•ganiration No. 6 for a review of 54; Council. A hearing date of April 14, 1986 was later- sc;hedul ed, and, WHEREAS, the City Council had 'before it the record of the proceeding before the Planning Commission. Th,! matter- was brought before l.he City Council under Section 18.32.31.0(b) and 18.32.320. The public hearing was held on April 14, .1986; and, WHEREAS, the relevant criteria in this case are Tigard t;arirprehensive Plan polici¢s 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3:2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 1.4.4. , and £t.1.3 and Community Development Code Chapters 18 .5cI, 7.8.160, arid 18.164. Sir�r_e has been acknowlcadged, the Statewide Planning the Comprehensive Plan Goals and 'Guidelines no longer need to be addressed. WHEREAS the City Council. concludes that the proposal with minor modifi.catior,s `is consistent with the rel-eve t porh.i.ons of the Compre.lrensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: a. Policy ' 2.1.;: is satisfied be Huse t.hE Neighborhood Planning OryanizaLion enol surrounding prupc=rty r�wr}er s wG re given notice t's of -the heorri.ng iind an opportunity tc, common?, or; the appli.carr _proposal. Ok"DINANCE NO. f3ri -7 ry cy 1 b• Policy 3.1`.1 will be satisfied provided that any portions of the lots which exceed 25% slope are not graded or. 'filled without a '' Sensitive Lands 'Permit. Also, the wetlands areas on the site will be evaluated as part of the required permit :from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and" the 'Di.vision landState: Lands. c- Policy 3.2.1 will be satisfied because development within the 100 year flood plain will be avoided. if any of the proposed street does encroach upon the flood plain, a Sensitive Lands Permit will be required. d. Policy 7.1.2 can be met when additional information; noted in the Engineering Division comments, i's submitted and appropriate mitigation measures taken. e Policy 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 are satisfied because adequate water and sewer facilities are available to the development. The applicant also indicates that these facilities will be provided within the subdivision as required by the City standards.; f. Policy 8.1.1 will be met once the termination of Riverwood Lane at 92nd Avenue is justified or provisions for future extension to the east are made. g. Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied when the conditions of approval relating to street improvements -are completed. WHEREAS, THE City Council has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon ' the findings noted below: a. Chapter 18.50 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets <all of the requirements of the R-4.5 zone. b• Chapter 18.160 of the Code is satisfied because theproposalmeets the requirements set forth for the submission and approval of a preliminary plat. C. Chapter 18.164 of the Code will be sati.siied during the approval process for the final plat_. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION l: The City Council upheld the Planning Cor mission deci.Si011 based upon the findings, and cX111clusions above, and approve:; of S 1-86 subject to. the following condi.tinns': 1• UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTF}.>, A}.i: CONUJITIONS SHALL BE MFT PR 1 o1z. TO RECORDING 711jr,, r}NAI, PLAT'.' Stant and }lair-.;tt,>F t>and' full stre•.t mpr .vemt.•ttt s i'r : lucii tWu sidewalks, curbs, streetlight. ar.ivewd�, al;rc3ns, st.c•rm 'dra�n,i t> and utilities tdeletr. ityappl,._: :,lr tt_,-.t;) shall be inst:aile,: along the SW 92nd Aver:ue frontage. Said improvements alrn•o SW 92nd Avenue shalt he built to ib0` R/W, 3Fi" Pvmt,) >. standards inc iudirrd an ,I n t:jp, w,.!y,: ,<,itte and rrt to the a] i( r.mu-rot, "f Y . ,F.. _ not,.Lf:s ttatt.r. attached ,e{a_ c,rE3 > Page 2 Seven (7) sets of plan-profile p public improvement construction plans including a site grading plan and cross sections and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil 'Ent3ineer, improvements shall be detailing all proposed public E= submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. 4 Sanitary and storm sewer plan—profile details shall be 'provided as part of the public improvement plan. `�• Slope easements along SW River-wood Lane shall be provided to the public. Documentation shall be on City Norms or on the,plat and approved by the Engineering Section. 6. The applicant shall provide a stormwater runoff report addressing proposed onsite and offsite stormwater control and soilerosion control (during and after :construction); said report shall also address the impact of upst`rream drainage facilities on the site and th--e mitigation of stormwater damage to the downslope City park and open space lands. 7'. Construction of 'proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering; Section has issued approved public improvement plans. The Sections will require posting of a 100% Performance bond, the payment of a permit fee and :a sign instal lationtstreelight fee. Also, the eiecution of a construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement r plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC .- INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES, BONDING AND AGREEMENTS.' 8 SW Riverwood Lane will connect with Riverwood Lane in the development to the west (Copper Creek),' 9 Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to -the Public along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage t-o increase the right-of--way to 30 feel, from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by Washington County. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section. DEOICA7ION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED, 10. Double frontage Lots 6,7,8, and ff shall face 93rd Avenue and be restricted to only one access each on a same` public` roadway. 11. Lot #16 shall only have direct access onto SW Riverwood Lane. 12 The applicant shall` providp a traffic report indicating measures to he applied to miti.9ate sight distanre. concerns, at the ' intersection of Riverwood Lane and 92nd Avenue to the Engineer irig - -tion, the Rivers.oad Lane easterly accass shall be addressed in conjunction with this <study. 13: Lots 17 and 18 shall bo deleted and half street; improvements wi11 not be required on the east sido of 32nd Avenue at this tame. fftal.f stmt t improvements will be constructed at the tiale that I.W.s 17 and 1.8 are developed. ORDINANCE NO. 86- �L r Lh Riverwood lane shall be extended t{, 92nd Avenue witti L11Q Ole bayii criterion noted in Item #5 of the memo dated 4/3/:86 f coo tine Ciiy :Engineer (Exhibit "A.) , Will be addressed. Final approval of street and parking design sha_�l,be granted by the City Engineer. k The property shall be surveyed and the applicant shall dedicate lands within the -100 yeas.^ floodplain'for gr•eenway purposes. 1�. The necessary; permits shall be obtained from the U.S. 'Army Corps ` of Engineers and the Division of State Lands, The ;preliminary' plat shall be modified as 'necessary- to accommodate the condition(s) of approval granter) by these ttvo agencies, 17. if yellowed through the permit process by ;the Corps of Engineers ! and Division of Stai a Lands, as footpath shall be incorporates) between River•wood Lane ,and Cook Park. 1a, Street Centerline Monumentation a. In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2), the centerlines of all street and roadway rights-of-ujay shall be monumented before the City shall accept a :street improvement; b. All centerline monuments shell be placed in; a ' monument box conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument boxes shall be set at design finish grade of said street or roadway, C. The following;centerline monuments shall be set: (Y) All centerline-centerline intersections. Intersections created with "collector" or other ex sting streets, shall be set when the centerline alignment of said ; "collector' or other street has been established by or for the City: (2) Center of all cul-de-sacs. r (3) Curve points, points of intersection (P I) when their position falls inside the limits of the pavement otherwise beginning and ending points (S C and E C ). (Q) All sanitary and storm location shall be placed in �1 positions that do not interfere with centerline monumentation. rs 19.'' A Sensitive Lands Permit shall be required for any encr•oachnwinL 1' into the 100 year floodplain or construction' in drainageway or slopes`over- 25%. 20. Lot 12 -shall` be subject to the setback and height requirement!< For flag lots contained in Sections 18,96.090 and 18.98 of the Code. 21 . A trey cutting permit shall be obtained from the City prior to removing any trees over b inches in diameter. ,z C OR:Sl:NFeNc (: rat>. 86 2d, 2 p agv 4 22. "Local Traffic only" signs will be allowed at the entrance to the subdivision at 92nd Avenue. 23. The,applicant shall create CC&R's compatible with adjacent subdivisions of Kneeland Estates and Copper Creek. ant shall submit to staff for approval a rendering The applic 24. of a structure for example but not limited to a brick wall) to indicate that a driver is entering a neighborhood. 25. 'shall be part of Phase I of the project. Lots 6, 72 8, and 11 26. After review and approval by the Planning Director and City Engineer, the Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington , County. 27, This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. 1 SECTION 2. It is fuxther ordered that the applicant be notified. of the entry of this order. ei By unanimous vote of all Council members present after PASSED: 1f986 read by number and title anly, this day Y9 V�Deputy City Recorder - Ci.ty of Tigard APPROVED: This day of May, 1986. ti ayor - City of Tigard r . ' ORDIt]ANcr. NO. 86 Page S F MEMORANDUM OF TIGARD, OREGON t E r T0; Members of City Council April 3, 1986 'e FR f : a. dy 'a5aoley City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Plat of Kneeland Estates IZI Zn discussions regarding the propos plat of Kneeland Estates. III, several � concerns have been raised regarding traffic and streets. Based on spy research and on discussions at the April 2, 1986 meeting of NPO 96, I have the fo l lowing commments. 1'. There is a great meal of concern about vehicles traveling at excessive speeds on Sial 92nd Avenue between the High School and Cook Park. This is apparently an existing problem, not related to the subdivision. It e r appear:: to me that this is a traffic; engineering problem which we 1' should address this sumapr as a City problem, rather than as a � subdivision condition. about through traffic on neighborhood 2. There is a great deal of concern streets, f- special concern is the Comprehensive Plan designation of . Riverwood Lane as a minor collector connection between Sia! 92nd Avenue and sw 108th Avenue. I feel that it is a valid concern. Therefore, I recommend a review of this portion of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map for possible thisent. The review needs to be initiated promptly, as several amendmdevelopments are contemplated in the area in the near future. 3. There was a guest ion whether Riverwood Lane should be extended east of ; SW 92nd. Review shows that such an extension would require substantial fill in the floodplain and wetlands areas. A better location for an �. eastward access road appears to be approximately 350 feet north of Riverwood Lane at the top of the hill. I recommend that Rivemood Lane not be extended eastward from SW 92nd Avenue. 4. The concept of constructingRiver-wood Lane as a narrower—than—standard street was discussed. NPO #6 slid not support the idea. Therefore, I recommend that Riverwood Lane in Kneel and Estates Ill be designed at the same width as the existing River-wood Lane in: the adjoining subdivision (approximately 34 feet) . Merno to Council April 3, 19P6 Page 2 c �. There was concern that adequate sight distance be provided on SW 92nd Avenaae for safe traffic operations. ' A traffic study was suggested to address this concern. I feel that we can achieve better results by specifying certain design criteria. Therefore, I recommend that Planning Commission Condition No. 12 be amended to recd as follows: 12. The public improvement plans for SW 92nd Avenue shall' provide a minimum stopping sight distance of 300 feet along 'SW 92nd Avenue and a minimum intersectionsight distance of +350 feet for vehicles entering from Riverwood Lane. These criteria are based on national standards developed by the American Association of StateHighr ay and Tr^anspoA^tat on Officials_ (Af3S4iTb) . The AASHTO standards are somewhat conservative, thereby providing for the fact that some vehicles will exceed the design speed of 35 MP14 (the current speed limit). These requirements'are greater than'what 'we would usually require on a minor collector such as SW 92nd. 6 There was a request for additional traffic studies to determine 'existing r , traffic volumes and traffic speeds on SW 92nd Avenue. Such studies would be useful in addressing existing traffic concerns on SW 92nd Avenue,- but ;would probably ;not help much in deciding how to design � Kneeland Estates III, rherefore, I`would questions "whether volume/speed studies should be a condition of subdivision approval. (RRW:br/2436P) i i CITY OF TIC:ARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 96--_-2: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTIONS 18.114.150, 18:120.090, 19.134' 060, 18.140.080, 18.142 080,'> 14.144.090, 18.146.060, 18.148.040 AND 18.162.070 OF' THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTCODE TO CONFORM TO ORDINANCE NO. 86-08. WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its ' Community Development Code periodically to improve the operation and implem2r:tat#.rsn of the Cade; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council revised the Community Development Code the the adoption of Ordinance No 9"8; and WHEREAS, some sections of the existing Community Development Code do not conform to Ordinance No. 86-08; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment on April 8, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on the proposed changes Oil May THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS Section 1: The Community Development Cade shall be amended as shown below. Language° to be added in UNDERLINED. Language to be deleted is shown in [BRACKETS]. Chapter 18.114.150(a) 3.) dames and addresses within 250 feet_ Chapter 18.120,090(a)(2) Change from [100] to 250 feet. Chapter 18,134.060(a)(2) Change from [100] to 250 feet. ChIapter 18.140.080(d)(2) Change from [100] to 250 feet. Chapter 18.142.090(a)(2) Change from [100] to 250 feet. Chapter 18.144.080(a)(2) Change from [100] to 250 feet. Chapter 18.146.060(a)(2) Change from [100] to 250 feet. Chapter 18.. 148.040(a) (2) names and addresses within 250 feet. Renumber 2 and 3. Chapter 18.162.070(a)(2) Change from [1003 to 250 feet. ORDINANCE NO. 86- <7-75 Paye 1 Section 2: That this ordinance 'shall be effective on and after the 31st "day after- its passage by tae Council, and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: BYt7rLn� �rGu _ vote of all Council members present after, being read ` by number and title only, this ,fLi i day of cz,u 1986. �,, R. � J�(_SfJtLoreaiiilson, Deputy Recorder r/ APPROVED. Thais } day cf � )� 1986. �Ij— ; ,TsShp- i . Cook', Mayor — — f1 (2505P) 1, ORDINANCE Yeo. 86 ,�..3, P��e;� 15 ffm CITY'OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINAP�CE !fl. t36- �- � o f _ A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY P1-AT APFROTHE � REQUESTED BY LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN, FILE NO S1 - 86, UPHOLDING t HE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS, ENTERING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. WHEREAS, ,the Tigard City Council heard the above application at it's Reaular Meeting of April 14, 1986 in a review of the Planning Commission action of March 4, 1986. The applicant was represented by ';Norse Harker of Alpha Engineering. Appearing in opposition were David Domer, Salla LeRoy, Don Mangelli and Dan Leslie and; Phil Pas.teris representing P.S3O 6. The Council finds the following facts in this matter: WHEREAS, the applicant applied for preliminary plat approval for an 18 lot subdivisionon an 8.68 acre property on the west and east side of 92nd ;Avenue south of Kneeland Estates II (WC1'M 2S1 14A, T. 1,.. 900) WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission conducted a Fearing on this twiitter•- on March 4, 1986. The Commission voted to grant preliminary plat approval of S1-86 subject to conditions. The information ` supporting; the applicant's request, the record of the hearing, and the final order of the Planning Commission are found in Planning File Nunber S1-86; and, WHEREAS, on March 10, 1986, the application was appealed by ( Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 6 for a review of the record before the Council: R hearing date of April -14, 1986 was later scheduled, and, WHEREAS, the City Council had before it the record of the proceeding before the Plarfnimj Commission. The matter was brought before the City Council under Section 10.32.310(b) and 18.32.320. The public hearing was held on April 14, 1986;_ and, WHEREAS, the relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4. 8.1.1, and ,8.1.3 and Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.160, and 18.164. Since the Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, the Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines no longer need to be addressed. WHEREAS, the City Council concludes that the proposal with minor modifications is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based'upon the findings noted below: a. policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding, property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. ORDINANCE NO, 86 Page I b. Policy 3.1.1 will 'be satisfied provided that any portions of the lots which exceed 25% slope are not 'graded or filled without a Sensitive Lands Permit. Also, the wetlands areas on the site will be evaluated as part of the required permit from the U.S. 'Army Corps of Engineers and the Division land State Lands. ` C. Policy 3.2.1 will be satisfied because development within the 100 year flood plain will be avoided. if any of the proposed street does encroach upon the flood :plain,: a Sensitive Lands Permit will be required. d. Policy 7.1.2 can be meet when additional information, noted in the Engineering Division comments, is submitted and appropriate mitigation measures taken. ' e. Policy 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 are satisfied because adequate water and sewer facilities are available to the development. The applicant also indicates that these facilities will be provided within the subdivision :as required by the City standards. f'. Policy 8.1.1 will be met once the termination of Rive6:wood Lane at 92nd Avenue is justified or provisions for future extension to the east are made. g. Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied when the conditions of approval relating to street improvements are Completed. WHEREAS, THE City Council has 'determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: a. Chapter 18.50 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets all of the requirements of the R-4.5 zone. b. Chapter 18.160 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets the requirements set forth for the submission and approval of a a preliminaryplat C. Chapter 18.164 of the Code will be satisfied during the approval process for the, final plat. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The: City Council upheld the Planning Commission decision based upon the findings, and conclusions above, and approve of s 1-86 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALI. CONDITIONS SHALLBEMET PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT. 2. Standard 'Half-street and full .street improvements includin, sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drain.iwt> and utilities (delete inapplicable items) shall be installed along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage. Said improvements al( = SW 92nd Avenue shall be built to (60' R/W, 36" Pvmt.) City standards including an 8 ft walk on the west side and .'011! •rm to the alignment of existing improvemenr.s. (" note the attached section which was approved via Kneeland Estate; Subdivision development.) ORD I N6lNC., N,'. 86-a'Z - Page 2 3. Seven (7) sets cif plan-.profile public improvement construction' plans including a site grading plan and cross 'sections and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil 'Enijineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. 4. Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profile details shall be provided` as part of the public improvement plan. 6, Slope easements alone SW Riverwood Lane shall be provided to the public Documentation shall be on city forms or on the plat and approved by the Engineering Section. 6. The applicant small provide a stormwater runoff report addressing proposers onsite and offsite storswater control and soil erosion control (during and after construction) said report shall also ,address the impact of upstream drainage facilities on the site :and the sroitigation of `storam4atar damage to the downslope City park and open ,space 'lands 7. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not com,Mence until .after ;the Engineering Section has ;issued approved public. improvement ,plains'. The Sections will require ,p+ostirn of a 1001: perfoz~ ance bond, the payment of< a permit fee and a sign installationlstreelight fee. Also, the execution of a construction` compliance' agreement ` shah. occur prior to, or its re+araer�enfi concue^rently' with ; the issua:;Yce of app.rowed public. P plans. SEE THE EP�CLOSED HPtP3fDOU GIVXNG MORE SPECIFIC 1 s4110td�4RTI0k1 `RECARDIOG"FEE 'SCHED LES ON DTNG AND ACF€EES�Eit'T S. 8, SW Riverwood Lane will connect with Riverwood Lane in the ~ development to the west (Copper Creek). 9, Additional.right-of-WaY shall be dedicated to -the Public along the SW 92ndAvenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 Y feet from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be timed to the existing right-of-may centerline as established by Washington County. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by: the Engineering Section. DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED 10. Rouble frontage Lots 697,8, and 11 shall face 93rd Avenue and be restricted to only one access each on a same public roadway. 11: Lot 016 shall only have direct access aceto SW Riverwood Lane. 12. The applicant shall provide- aa traffic report indicating measjsres to be applied to mitigate sight distance concerns, at the inter-section of Riverer:ood Lane , and 92nd Avenue, to the Engineering` Section:. t'he Riverwood Lane easterly access shall be 'addressed in conjunction with this study.. Lots 17 and 18 shall be deleted and half street improvements �' will not be requirpd on the east side of 92nd Avenue at this time. Half street improvements will be constructed at the time, that Lots 17 and le are developed. ORDINANCE NO. 86- Page 3 14 Riverwood Lane shall be extended co 92nd Avenue with the dteb:yli :criterion noted in Item #(5 of the memo dated 4/3/86 from the City iEnc�ineer (Exhibit "A:D . will be addressed. Final approval of street r. land parking design sh4li,'be granted by the City Engineer. 15. The property shall be surveyed and the applicant shall dedicate {. lands within the 100 year floodplain for rees^�wa a3 y purposes; 16She necessary permits shall be obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of ;State Lands. The preliminary plat shall be modified as necessary to accommodate the, condition(s) of approvalgranted by these two agencies. 17: if allowed through the permit process by the Corps of Engineers and Division of "State `Lands, a footpaths shall be 'incorporated between Riverwood Lane and Cook Park. 1s Street Centerline Monumentation a. In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection '(2), the centerlines of all street and roadway rights—oi aeay shall be monumented bufor�e the City shall accept a street improvement. b. All centerline' monuments shall be placed in a monument box, conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument boxes shall be set at design finish grade of said street or roadway. C. The following centerline monuments shall be set: ` (1) All centerline—centerline intersections. Intersections .. created with "collector" or ether existing streets, shall;be set when the centerline alignment of said "collector' or other street has been established by or for the City: (2) Center of all cul—de-sacs. (3) Curve , points, points of intersection ' (P I) when their- position falls - inside the limits of -the pavement otherwise beginning and ending points (B C and E C ). (4) All sanitary and storm location shall be placed in positions that do not interfere with centerline monumentation. 19. A Sensitive' Lands Permit 'shall be required for any encroachmont into the 100 year floodplain or construction in dr-ainagewa_ys or slopes over 25%. 20 Lot 12 shall be subiject to the setback- and height° requirements for flag lots contained in 'Sections 18.96.090 and 18.98 of the Code: 21. A tree cutting permit shall be obtained from the City prior to removing any trees over 6 inches in diameter.' 86 ORDINANCE NO. Paste 4 a� ,. 22. "Local Traffic Only" signs will be allowed at the entrance to the subdivision at 92nd Avenue. 23., The applicant shall create CC&R'scompatible with adjacent subdivisions of Kneeland Estates and Copper Creek. 24. The applicant shall submit to staff for approval a rendering : of a structure (for example but not limited to a brick wall) to indicate that a driver is entering a'neighborhood. 25. Lots 6, 7,.8, and 11 shall be part of Phase I of the project. 26. After review and approval by the Planning Director and City Engineer, ,the Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington County. a= 27. This approval is valid if exercised ?+Tithin one year of the final decision date noted below. :r SECTION 2: It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present after being � s, read by number and title only, this ��`$� day of May, 1986. � 1Deputy City Pvecorder - Citg= of Tigard APPROVED: This h day of May, 1986. or —'City of Tigard 8f+ URIDIN2dCE NO. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREW9 TO: Members of City Council / April 3, 1956 FROM: Randy Dooley, City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Plat of Kneeland Estates III In discussions regarding the proposed plat of Kneeland Estates III, several concerns have been raised regarding traffic and streets. Based on; my research and on discussions ` at the April 2, 1986 meeting of NPO $6, I have the following comments: 1. There is a great deal of concern about vehicles traveling at excessive speieds on Sens 92nd Avenuebetween the High, School and Cook Parte. This is apparently an existing problem, not related to the subdivision. It t appears to re that this is a traffic engineering ;problem which we should address this , summer as a City problem, rather than as a subdivision condition. 2. There is a great deal of concern about through `traffic on "neighborhood streets." Of special concern is the Comprehensive Plan designation of Riverwood Lane as a minor collector connection between SW 92nd Avenue and SW 108th Avenue. I feel that it is a valid concern. Therefore, I recommend a review of this portion of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map for possible amendment. The review needs to be initiated, promptly, as several developments are contemplated in the area in the near future. 3. There was a question whether Riverwood Lane should be extended east of SW 92nd. Review shows 'that such an extension would require,substantial fill in the floodplain and wetlands areas. A better location for an eastward access road appears to be approximately 350 feet north of Riverwood Lane at the top of the hill. I recommend that Riverwood Lane not be extended eastward from SW 92nd Avenue. 4. The concept of constructing Riverwood Lane as a narrower-than-standard street was discussed. NPO #6 did not support the idea. Therefore, I recommend that Riverwood Lane in Kneeland Estates III be designed at the same width as the existing Riverwood Lane in the adjoining subdivision (approximately 34 feet) ra-1121 NO Ell 'J $� Memo to:Council April 3, 1985 , Page 2 c Vii. There was concern that adequate sight distance be provided on Sid 32nd Aveniiefor safe traffic operations A traffic study was suggested to t address this concern. T feel that we can achieve better results by specifying certain design criteria. Wherefore, I recommend that � Planning Commissions Condition No. 12 be amended to read as follows* 12.. The public improvement 'plans for SW 92nd Avenue shall C provide a minimum stopping sight 'distance of 300 feet $ along SW 92nd Avenue and a ` minimum intersection sight t distance of 350 feet for vehicles enter°ng from Riverwood Lane. These criteria are based ;on national standards developed by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). The j AASHTO standards are somewhat conservative, thereby providing for the 6 fact that some vehicles will exceed the design speed of 35 MPH (the f current speed. limit). These requirements are greater than what we would usually ,require on a minor collector such as SW 92nd. . _- 6.' There was a request for additional traffic studies to determine existing (� traffic ' volumes and traffic speeds on Sid 92nd Avenue. such studies °r would pe useful in addressing existing traffic concerns< on Sad 92nd Avenue, but would probably not help much in deciding hose to design ` Kneeland Estates III. Therefore, I would questions whether volume/speed studies ,should'be a condition of subdivision approval: � (RRW:br✓2436P) AGENDA ITEM fid2 - VISITOR'S AGENDA ©ATE I-AY 5, 1986 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you fsrst' try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME '& ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED tdar a - d 5: k DATE MAY 5, 1986 ., I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the €olloving item (Please print the information) Item Description: # 5 ZOA 2-86 PUBLIC HEARING NTOTICE`REQUIREMENTS °r opponent (Against Issue) proponent (For lasue) Fj ao Address Af.fil.iation Name, Address and �ffi $ati®n I 11n, I : Adeenda item Review of Kneeland' Estates . ' KNEELAND ESTATES (A) The following were proposed modifications to Kneeland Estates Development, the entry to and Riverwood Lane: oc " 1) Request that the City of Tigard immediately post PRIVATE. PARKING ONLY" signs along Riverwood Lane. Another, poss- ibility being signs indicating Parking by Permit Only. 2) Redesign Riverwood Lane (in the new development) so that it has a number curves (possibly eliminating proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3) to 4ie.lp slow traffic . 3) Place traffic circle in Riverwood Lane .to help slow the flow of traffic . One possi-bility being, adding speed bumps. 4') A f/Ancy entrance (brick wall , for example) might help discourage traffic from driving in to look around. . . might imply, that ' the -street is an entrance to- a residen- tial neighborhood and not a through street . Signs s hould be put up indicating "LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY" . 5) OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN:' CHANGOMPRESHENSIVE PLAN TO PRE- VENT RIVERWOOD LANE FROM BEIN�_PUNCHED THROUGH TO 108th . and/ultimately, Hwy. 99. 6) During construction , that there be access to this develop- ment from 92nd only. 7) There be no unnecessary grading done to the lots until individual building permits be issued . (grade street area only) . 8) The covenants for this new development be congruent with addj�yacen(t (develop/ments. 1 1 ' GjEr `J' d y/ _5kovdd be- alyAaro'c- Gvta Jn�z 16 A! cot"4k div« 7u.0 500 Ktcr (B) Other _items that, were agreed to by the NPO and the attening concerned' neighbors are as follows. 1) It was agreed that the housed on lots 7 and 8 should be facing Riverwood Lane and hopefully be lower on the loL.s and therfore below_ the. view of the homes in the cul (te' s.,: above 2 ) Also , that there be an r1cce•ss _! II. In connection with Kneeland Estates, it is the recommendation of the NPO the following: 1') that the comprehensive plan wording be changed. , having 108th be changed to a minor collector . 2). River.wood Lane become a local street . 3} Riverwood Lane, would support developments to the west without a direct connection to 108th. III. Next Adgenda item - (S-86) ButlerTerrace. A new ; plan was drawn up showing only' 6 lots rather than the 7 as 'originally planned. The ''NPO voted unanimously to approve the new .6 'lot plan. V IV. Next Adgenda item - School stripping on S.W. 92nd . Suggestion by NPO that stripping be done to the following ares indicating that there is-a school crossing: ` 92nd and Inez , Pinebiook and 92nd and Leslie Circle and 92nd . Phil. will be talking the City of Tigard concerning the procedure that is ne'cessa'ry to take in the matter'. 1 : V. text Adgenda item - Other Business'. The Town Hall meeting . Phil attended this meeting and shared with us his thoughts. He felt that. the context of the meeting did not do what the "invitation" indicated it was going to do. Phil 'forwarded his comments on to city of(`icials . Uf Wft _ ®y T1LIA�.GY (�✓� p�EUL6Cc S tin fe.5(tc t ��t -R4jAVn,K Com,.Vv, �: ) 1 +,, j r �r Z� S�c�i,�cr.�.�-5 C�-Ple�i�j w✓�z` opf'VVVO ) S Wil. w, /�,t � �` �_" d��r 4.f�.t��i. i`;• .'l�t �F'�Y`.'C.+fl� �(�i'. � _ April 11, 1986 ;j Operations Division (NP?OP-R-1) Subject: Tualatin River Fill �i 1 Alpha Engineering, Incorporated ATTN: Norman Barker 1750 S.W. Skyline Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97221 Dear lir. Harker: We have reviewed your request for information regarding our n permitting authority for your proposed housing development near the aF Tualatin River, :Zile 10, in Washington County, Tigard, Oregon. v The Corps of Engineers, under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, has 7 the authority to issue permits for fill or dredged material placed in L Maters of the United States. The terse "water of the United States" r includes the territorial seas and all waters, up to their ordinary high -d water mark, that are part of a surface tributary system to and including ! navigable waters of the United States. Wetlands adjacent to these waters e'en are also "waters of the United States". w Based on a recent inspection by Corps personnel, parts of the proposed development site are within wetlands adjacent to the Tualatin o River. In particular, S.W. Riverwood Lane, west of`the 's ewer line, and :j lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 18 contain wetland areas (enclosure 1). aherefore,'an individual permit must be processed prior to placing fill in these areas. For activities involving fill in wetlands, a permit will be denied if there is a less environmentally damaging practicable alternative. Practicable alternatives, such as developing at other locations, reducing the scope of the project to minimize wetland filling, or redesigning the'-,., project to avoid filling wetlands, must be considered in our evaluation. �•. � If no practicable alternative exists, and a need for the project to be 'located in the wetlands and river corridor is justified, then the project should include measures to mitigate for the impacts of the fill i ' Jactivity. Such measures could ideally include replacing in kind the wetland habitat to be filled with wetlands of equal value, or enhancing the value of other nearby wetlands that will not be disturbed. { % INNER �Au V Erclosed Is a permit application;fom (enclosure 2) for your use. Ebeu we receive the completed application vas can further anaess your permit needs. If Nova have any,,qu�esciano, pleas' contact Ri�'.+art! Jo�n�crs9, Chi�a�, Fsralt Evaluation Section, at the above address or telephone (543) 221-5995. SiT%cere3p, 10. A. k*U*.rr.„d Chief, Re,$,uiatory Branch Daclozulre E. c 1 i �r�' 7 t�l. �y't'Cr ti� e�° •1 i t�t't � .•/R �j m � �' LU on vi Z L ui co ............ T"�`t- • >. t 7 : \ t • '�S' .�Er < `j Y •. I j sn ` e v e r i � � � I 1 � �A � t)t.'tt 1 i 1 f � �, � ?'i r 1 ' tf z . g t cu 'Et :{dl ter•.• f•'it �-�::t r_; .,®..T* t1 } ! is{p I �1 Sf t •:.r f. :I.,U1f r :. t b .: �'�r✓/t r `fr%�// �sl.-.t 1 B tit w�.� 1�1,'I I•l0 +ALt RI CILI / �f ; ' �'- �Ls !�- t �` Cr r� �r .q'1'•;\ 1 i 1 � ji r �; 1 l �,. cr Z+ 1 adw R z®a r.rtlrJ//rfl� I� c:r r r� an�^,.s •J 1 C .NPS rnaC� '•./��/,'s�!(/�t.i./ /��. __ - �"�,.=-x. t � r Ileo < r Il'a - o `oma- 3 y,',. aa"1•aS°a ��ne ''• r%�% 7 'rr:: / 11� 7 ` ;1'� 1 t � l f 1 r W ; c&lgf ! r t u¢I ,t + � � ��•� C t"�c o /tr/ t;r/'.. 1 i• r _ � 95 -,/ Z a. -------------- - � • � t 1 � • ,. �;•'r., A as ,� 1 l 11 / l..i,./ !� i- `\♦ tF W [?'tF ii11 ®, "s t r '7I / i r •LL t 0 LU •. a""'a" g �.. It{i,/1.,1( t r 1 r ,1 r! •yip 1 CtE i� � let i c> .-•>$ aLAO Zjz LU � �. � S ��• �- �i :i '•' �/I r,.Iia ! r t !: ` 1 t tt .•,` a � ao ` �,♦��`\`\,+R` �.`,i♦,,,tl�``{i 7. 1 1 ! I��r t,ir O'/ / 1 i a i o `u •i r,+ltt' / / .,�1. ; f , I 1 0 a!i1V3Ii V N e ..1.7.I i i r 1 �r 1 r err J/ /77 I ysrnlb h46.a J `tel � l9 ; � lit.j�•r l�;,l,,' �tr(./r /i.[/ri t� rr ``.`` � :j k VA a o �I�r a i. 6Qr1 di�3 r-' ef.•'_ ` t'r i'a � t ��.- 1 r' / /., f i �.el trlti r •( •r..ft f!q / ,. � p. yy r r M T'• �* 1 �l' d'•�r f r •� 1 1 r 1 r �♦ �a i. � ♦fir-�" �t , ' , rr f ♦r /. - \` i 9 r r ( � <`�• I � D/ °'/5/G� March 31 , 1486 Robert Jean, ,Administrator City dministrator- City of Tigard R. 0. 'Box 23347 Tigard, Oregon 47223 Dear Mr. Jean, This letter is a follow asp to toady's visit to the site of the praczed Krae land development. -Those present weere:' myself; Dana 5ie?gfried, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; Norm Harker, Alpha 4 Engineering; Keith L.i den, city of Tigard planner and one other city representative. The objective of this field visit was to identify what wetland issues there might be regarding future development of this site. The impetus of the site visit was � letter I sent to the Tigard planning department dated March 3, 1486. 1 have attached a copy of that letter for your infor ration. In that -letter I pointed out that logs 1 , ^ 3, 17 and IS were all "clearly within existing wetlands and should not be built on." I assume that. since I mentioned in t: iat letter that a Section 404 permit Froin the Array Corps would be required they were consulted in this matter by your staff. This morning three issues emerged which 1 would like to address: 1 . Westland and riparian wildlife habitat regarding the Kneeland development. 2. Wetland identification on a city-wi.de? basis relating to your comprehensive plana. 3. City of Tigard parks; natural habitat vs. developed park lands, especially as parks management relate=s :to wetland issues. Regarding the first issue: .There are several 'points I 'd like to make about the proposed development. I.:s�cassl d ;appreci ate it i4 yogi. a d.. sa e-;. ; »he�Eae,::irsto tsie' of fric3al .e ecs�rd -rsegarding this davol� r rat: iasc i.t: A :ers;i,6;ely ,,1 a+ ll. .b a#aie. taa::attend the Apri2-',,14tha :hearinU6 a. As I pointed out in my March 3rd letter, there are wetlands invol*ted with some of the lots- Lots 11 29 3 and 18 are clearly within wetlands. Of these, lot IS also appears to be within the 100 year floodplain. In my opinion this lot should have no development on it. It is adjacent to a significant ff wetland. What exists on this site is a well-defined emergent t` wetland to the south of lot IS which is bordered by a scrub-shrub airtl rad consisting Of wOGdy plants such as willow, Oregon while f' ash, willow and other wetland species. This scrub-shrub wetland is also an a significant portion of lot, 18. The rest of lot IS � consists of typical riparian vegetation that is found along watercourses such as rivers, streams, ponds and wetlands in the 2 Tigard area. The wetlands appear on the draft copy of the U. Fish; and Fish and Wildlife's National wetlands inventory (Beaverton area) . I have enclosed a copy of that map with the areas in question circled. The wetlands appear to be more extensive on the ground than might appear on their map. I will bre sending a copy of this letter to Ben Harrison, National Wetlands Inventory office in Portland for their information. Most of 'their wetland mapping i s done `through aerial photography interpretation and, while generally excellent, cannot catch all of the wetlands in the metropolitan area. it is significant to note that they do show the emergent wetlands to the east of Sol 1 92nd on theirmap. Keith d_iden indicated that these' may ,not appear on your comprehensive plan map for wetland resources. � Reference to your "Flood Plain And Wetlands", on page 1-23 of R your plan would indicate this to be the case. There are no wetlands noted on `either side of "SW 012nd on this map. I will discuss this further under point 2 of this letter. I have � enclosed a copy of your flood plain and wetlands map as well . Lot ''1� does appear to be out of the riparian and wetlands, altd ough it does have an excellent stand Of riparian vegetation. This site, assuming the slope characteristics are not limiting, could be developed without significantly impacts the adjacent' wetlands. This is not the case with lot IS for the reasons I have pointed out. b. Lots I and 2 are also within wetlands. I would urge your staff to take a careful look to determine whether they are also within the 100 year floodplain. The adjacent wetlands, although significant, are not as high quality as those east of 92nd, south of lot 18. It is my opinion that, if the applicant can secure the appropriate permits, and if an acceptable mitigation plan can be worked out with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, these two lots could be developed. This will require adequate buffering between the proposed development and the existing wetlands and should include some modifications of these wetlands to enhance their wildlife habitat values (plantings, increased plant diversity, digging of ponds, etc.) . All of this, of course, should be done in concert with the part's department developing its own plans for the continued protection of these wetlands (discussed under point 3 of this letter) C. Lot 25, seems to be intermediate between the first two subnunits I 've addressed. It has more diverse wetland plant features ( more rushes, willows, etc. and is much less a monoculture of reed canarygrass ) ." This lot seems even more likely to be aiithin the 100 year floodplain,. If it is not, and nd a 404 permit can be obtained for development is allowed, a limited vaetland fill , then mitigation would be in order. My recommendation would be that any mitigation plan that is developedbe coordinated for lots 11 2, and 3 so that a biologically and hydrologically sound plan can be developed. d. It is unclear whe=ther the Corps has jurisdiction over thee on the hillside which 1 i e 'upsl one from the proposed road. Darla Siegfried expressed doubt about their jurisdiction this morning. It is obvious from the existing vegetationthat a considerable amount of water does flow' down' the hill toward the wetland. < Therefore, there is a hydrologic connectio., between the two areas. Oftentimes seeps 'such' as this dei represent important wildlife habitat for suet•: species. as amphibians 1 feel their value should be recognized in the development of plans for the proposed development. e. The proposed road appears to be above the wetlands, altilough the seeps support wetland species throughout ,the alope. The hydrology of the entire slope; should be studied by the applicant to determine what impacts relating to drainage will be induced by placement of the road. f. l am concerned about the future of the small pond adjacent to SW 92nd. It clearly has significant wildlife habitat val lees and should be included in the overall site design to ensure its integrity is protected. I suggested this morning . that a 1.imiteq amount of public access for wildlife viewing would be desirable. sufficient planting of wildlife-attracting plants around the "pond would limit the -incursion of humans 'aroused the perimeter while allowing an observation site. The motorized vehicles which presently have a major negative impact on the site need to be discouraged. g. Resource agency involvement: The resource agency staff who most often work can issues of this nature are Gene Herb and Joe Peseh, Oregon T}epa,r tment, of Fish and Wil cis i f W z Di arra, Hwang and Nancy El l i f ri t, U. ' S. Fish and Wildlife se=rvice and representatives from the Regulatory Functions, Permit Section of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers < I assume in this case that would be Duna Siegfried ) . I strongly suggested during our site visit that these individuals should be t:on5ulted before an,, mitigation plans are established since your staff does not have a background in development of such plans. Gene Her-b' s office-- address fficeaddress is Sol- Gales Creek Pd. , Forest Grove, Oregon 97117 Phone: 229-5104. Joe Pesek's address is: 17330 Evelyn St. , Clackamas, Care. 97015 Phone: 657-205e. Diana and Nancy are in the same office at 727 AVE 24th St. , Portland, 47232 Phone:231-6179. ( t Point 2: Wetlands Inventory: Based on our field vi si_t and lack of indication of wetlands on either side Of SW 92nd, ' I can only conclude that your wetland mappinglinventary is incomplete. It is my opinion that there are very significant wetlands present on the Kneeland site as well as on adjacent kinds. The "for sale" � y sign to the east of 92nd, which is place in an emergent wetland indicates that future conflicts are in storey for this property as well . I 'd lil�e to suggest that you take another look at Your wetland resDurc:ee, as soon as possible. To date I have Completed t 4 5" i wetland, riparian and upland habitat inventories for. nine Washington County CPD's, City 04 Beavetons City of Gladstone, City of West Linn the Willamette oreernway update for the City of � Portland and am currently working on a Goal 5 ,update for the City of Portland.- 1 would be happy to assist thea City of Tis�ard in a , wetland/riparian wildlife habitat upt�ate that could he utilized on an interim basis until your comprehensive plan is due for j periodic reviews. Poi nL 3. Par-ks and wetlands: I am extremely concerned over the futaarse of the emergent and scrub-shrub wetlands between the Kneeland property+, and existing parklands at. Conk Parc. Will t these be maintained in a natural state by the city parks departR,ent? I have spent a great, deal of time discussing suO # issues iii th Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District (Bruce { Mull er,, their grounds management director), about this topic. ; l -feel they, have approached a nice balance between "active" and i "pasGive" parks management objectives anal would hope Tigard parks depa - rtment,would take, a similar"^approach. The existing natural wetlands on and adjacent to the Kneeland site offer excellent opportunity to provide a natural "buffer"; between the residential area and Cool: Paries active recveational areas. This also provides for the maintenance of significant wildlife habitat. ftfI hope tha=se.. comments have .been of some assistance in addressing s. - bm?T- the concerns l raised in ,my earlier 'letter and to your staff during our site visit'. if 3 can be of any additional help please t feel free to contact me at Audubon, 292-6855 or home 224-10 s. Michael C. Houck, Urban Naturalist cc® Joe Pesek, ODFW Gene Herb, ODFW r_ _ r_:- �a " a "an a3 ;S eg-F s.�c.x, ^.. ane a..o ps - e Diana Hwang, U. S. Fists and Wildlife Norm Harker, Alpha Engineering Sally Arroyo, neighborhood ass.aicatiora 3acic Broome, The Wetlands Conservancy Ralph Rogers, U. 'S. EPA Wetlands Program, Seattle, Wa. CITY OF TIGARD, 'OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUVIM CRY AGENDA OF: Ma S 1986 AGENDA ITEM it: DATE_ SUBMITTED: April 24, '1.986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Employee Awards erred Ree ozanti on PREPARED BY: Donna sorbet REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD'OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE The City of Tigard recognizes its employees annually with awards for length of service to the City. INFORMATION St fflARY' The following persons are receiving gold key plaques and small gold keys for 15 years of servicer Thcmias Killion and 'Robert Wheeler, Police Department; Robert Thompson, Engineering Depar~tment; and Loreen Wilson, Finance Department.. f� The following persons are receiving Key plaques for; 10 years of service: Robert J. Newman and Halbert' Merrill, Police Department; Karrin Hawes,' Library; and Ed Walden, Building Department. 'The following, persons are receiving framed keys to the city for 5 years service Lori DeVeny, Robert Par-burg and Rick Peterson, Police Department; Liz Newton, Planning Department; and Walt Zielinski, Operations Department. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED V SUGGESTED ACTION Presentation of Awards a w t , CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SLlMARY AGENDA OF:, 5/5/86 � � ,AGENDA ITEM DATA. SUAMT"TIED: 5/23/96 PREVIOUS ACTION: Citycouncil ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ;`S_1 — 86approval 4/1�if86' Kneeland Estaates IIT (Lincoln PREPARED BY: Keith Liden Savings .and Loan)_v REQUESTED BY: _ DEPARTMENT 44EAt3 UK: 44r100 ::TTY ADMINISTRATOR: 41 POLICY ISSUE Should a subdivision proposal off 92nd Avenue known as Kneeland Estates III be approved? k INFORMATION SUVNARY On April. 14, 1986, the City Council reviewed the appeal by NPO #6 of the Planning 'Commission approval of S 1 =- 86, The 'Council voted to uphold the Commission decision and ordered staff to prepare 'a final order. k Modifications to the "order 'm may be proposed by staff at the May 5 meeting based on preliminary review by the NPO during the week of April 28, 1986. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1, Adopt the final order and authorize the Mayor `to sign the order. 2. Amend, or correct the order and authorize the Mayor to sign the order. SUGGESTED ACTION' s The staff recommends that the City Council review the final order prepared by staff and accept it as written. �yA Sht.ccnf27) x rr CITY OF TIGARD, OREGOiai C 'CIL AGENDA ITE"i Sf3t VtARY ; AGENDA OF: May 51 1986 AGEI`VDA ITEM #: _ DATE S43BMEITED: April 23, ...19S6 PPEVIOUS ACTION: city adoted ISSUE/AGEWDA TITLE: 20A 2-86 Ordinance No. 86--08 on 1/10/86 PREPARED 6Y: Elizabeth Ann Newt-on REQUESTED BY Pl&nnin 'Staff DEPARTMENT HEAD t3VI CITY ADS IIMISl RATOR: _ � -- _ POLICY ISSUE Should the Council amend ordinance No. 86--08 by ordinance -to 'bring all applicable sections of the 'fiatnmunity Development `Cc;die into conformance with L, Ordinance No. 86 -08. �. INFORMATION SUMMARY On February 10, 1986 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 86-0€3 tidhi,ch �` f incorporated several changes to the ' Coa1munity Develrlpinent Code. On `the t. ,- recom.me.idation of the Planning Commission one of the changes made was to r require notification to property owners -within 250 feet on all applications riled with the Planning Department which .require ;public noti..ce. In the past, 4f' a,�pl.ic�.tions which ware decided at the Director's level only required � notification to property owners within 1.00 feet. Ordinance No. 86-08 changed one section of Title IS to require notice on all. applications to 'tae delivered to property owners within 250 feet,. Staff has discovered several other F sections of the Code which must ire changed to canforrn to Ordinance No. ,85-08. 3 . Section 18.114.150, 18.120.090, 18.134.060, .18.1 €0,080, 18.152,,080, i. 18.144.080, 18.146.060, 1P,.148.040, and 18.162.070 are hhe 'Sections of Title 18 which need to be modified.. A copy of the Planning Commission minutes are attached. Also attached is an ordinance for Council review: 4; ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached ordinance to bring all applicable sections of the Community Devc-.1op;rent Cade into conforinancr with Ordinance No.. 86-08. 2. Modify the attached ordinance �_.. _SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached ordinance to taring all applicable sections of `the Community Development Cade into conformance with Ordinance No. 85-08. (2!505P) ORDIUA Cr NO. 86-7__ Page1 e ' z M Er ,CTITY iOF TIGAM, OREGON ,City tcouncil -Apr '1 22., '1986 f :FROt�i; Planning ;StaffU °SUSJ'CCT: ,public ;Notice :Requirement k 0n ;F+ bruary 10•, 1986 the ;City Councll' adapted .Ordinance fMo.: i86-08 whiir:h !1"corporated several changes to :the �Commurn.ty Deyre?opment Cade. � On :aha r°ecommandation ,of the Planning koommiiss�s on gone of the rcfzaxcgc s made was to require ,notiifi:cation to ,property (owners ,within 250 ;feet {on 4111 applications filed ,suith the Planning ?Deparrtment �whi(�` -ret3uare public notice. Ir, the past;, t ppli.cations which ;were decided -at the Director's .lee+eil :only requi.r -,ed ;not"-fiCaLt:�ian to ;prpper"ty <owners w-Uhin :100 Feet. Ord+nanco Edo. Hti-OH -ct:�e�+ge� 'One .section of Title 9.8 to require' nciti"ce on a'1:1 vpp`lrcaa ons "to .be delivered to property ;owners w-I.tHin 250 feet. ,Staff has rii scnver ed several ,rsther s ec'ti"ons of the 'Cade which .mut €be ,charr ed to �confo�sm :to .ordinance =No 85-08. Secl ior< 3H" 1i#.;150, 18.'120 °.090„ 78..i34.J6O., s8:140;0H0., 1H.:152:080., 1H.a4'6; 060, .18,.7�4H:040,; ,and 1.8.1162-070 are the Sections �cf Title � 318 whirih Wesel to be mod-isf ed:. � + ' At .the April .8., —966 :N�nnn�.ng rcomm s.slion ,mea �.ng the :Commission voted i 11 unaniFinausl.y iao :reeommared .that bh:e 'Council. modify the ncces;sae^y Corrsmue�i+t}y f iOevelapmer3t 'Code .Gecti,orts to {conform ,to .Ord nance)tYo. H6"Q8. STAFF �RGCOVIME:WD T'IONI-- s Staff :recommends that the .City Couuc ll ,amore :the f.rl].oiaing :Sections .of [C:i.tle 1H -rif the ,Corri::eunity Development .Code to "conVomzi to Ordinance =€elo. 46"08 Sections:: 18-114.150 s 18.:7.3'4..O60 7:8..140:080 F ,1:8..742::080 , ,78..'14.5,:060 18,.:148,d04O 18,.7162.ti0%O � .r..;�;hatp"ter 18 3.1�A..150(aj .AD'7 ' ) ;'clones =and .addresses �ui'.t4-iin :250 feet.. _ rpewter 3.£t..3.20."090,(aj,(:2;j (Change .from "100 to "-250 feet.. , Gh}a, 't�zr 16-134.0fi0(aj;(2) Change .from 200 to 290 feet. Ch tChan e from 100 .to .250 feet.. -Pt � CNA 'er 1H..142.0£7O(aj:(21 +Change from 100 to ;250 Feet.. g: I'Ch.-%pter 118..144..080(zx)-;(:1) :Change from >3:0O "to .250 feet.. Chapts�r .1 H.. 46..060(x):.(2) Change from 100 to 250 feet, ;Gh pier 1'8,. l46,.;040,(-a.) Add '.(2,i ,names .arid "addresses �vtithrin '250 Meet. -Renu�lber 2 ,and 3.. ! Chxapter 1H..162...} O( )(:2j Change frc:,r� 100o 250 :feet. I RR �z :TIGAR[)=tzLAfUNLNG'`t%a3MM7 SSIOR1 a 11EGULAR MEETSNG APRIL'2, :1.986 il. €#�Cting .ldice=Presiiiertt =F,yre .calleu "the 'meeting '_tu ,aider at °7 AO°GSM. �lhe mec ting was 'hdld ,at Fraailer '3tanior.F}icjh Schod:l , `l1�t365"SLJ.Walnut, s �Tir�ar.'d, �©r�garr. 2. ;L20L'L CALL: 'PRESENT: Coiranii.s�ioners h;yre, .ButlEr., :F'etc7rson, Vancler!,eraoci, and!L_evs=ret t. sContmisskoners.-Moen, -Owens, '60,9 nanrt, •and:>lewn!an. :�iAFi`: SeniorLL Planner `K6ith " den, `�er.r'n_Laa y Diamt M. ::Jesider,-k<s. 3_ (APPROVAL:OF";`MINUTEb C:araarnis,inner 4Fiu.,J.er noted -a sFiell;n9 .error on the :tc�rtorai of ;p ye Garatmissior,er .Pe.terson aw ed and .t omraii•ssioner Leverestt ..�e prided 'to:a}aprrrve !the ruinutes a .arnenitcd. "Motion ,carried :by ma;or=i 4y .,vo tc of =Conrmi s s icner s ;Present:. /t NL'fi��aN7NG'Ct)MMISSION t t�t'ltlUIUICATION Staff erequ%sted ;that a 'survey .be compjetrsd Which hdd :been ,enclosed .in s.thc• .Parket :regarding•a trainirig :session with City"Couric 1. } �taiiB;1IcHEARINGS .5.�1(COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMEWUMENT CPA 2-96 AND ZIONE Cbff NGE =TC ,4-7`86 Vom rF�1SHER/K11:f1CHEL`.,WILFiErMtIRMf�'.tabFl:LTi Rich'# 2 ,� requeFt tfor ;:a .Comprchertsz.ve :-Plan 'Amendment 'frurn Lc,w and ,Medium "Jel�szty ;1?es:identidl tri Ne c iibr�rhu<ia t ornmerc zfl and <a .7_onca l;hangL from R 4•S ;stesideritsalA 5 units/acre) and R 1:2 .(Residra!t.i.ial, '12 uni.4slacre) :to •t:!N ;(rommerrial "Ntiir3hFaorFtood) Local.2d: .3 0' L17t10, 11'7.82, '% t178h `�W 'Gr:eenburg .Road (WGTM '.Lal. 3bl)C A,oL 7-�JUU .and '7c UQ). Seriaar Planner L.,-den •rev i.ewed :th'! 'Pr ypos;a l anti -rnacly s t: f f :s:r r�r_ommertrJat ir,n f: r-Se ci�erii�a�• - 'r•t't'-xewed .and Swbmi t t ed `t() Lhe `-C:usnuais:s soner:s JeE tt.c r s `from ,slr*x Frser.ien Reny Markov,a; 6:aalal<ei.z i1. `hzvrrrraar, ,& ?Rets=t 'ltivern;•�ra Meson; .and•-a;petaLz<.sas wiLti 4l siyrs��t.urc, r3pFiosjrsy `Ci!r FaroE>rasdl. F1lrPL CAN1 `�3 tNRLSENTA"_'I0{V Lain }si.shs.r„ il-3c)84a '$W ,.Vzcw ie.rrac:er .exFr1 tined `that }!c was �t ilr�rsri tim, rtzsict<?raE raf tFtt i�r 4, arui tarjUj,tl nuL hr lf_saviru3 tha_ <nrc.<s. }i ! -vas;csl.4 F!.av pr�.efer"rr4d t ra -d k for` a 'L.rtmrnc re is l Nrvf c ssiona! `de �t�ln�iE ar, t, haowe ver ,t.af C Ftwrz d isr,r,tar� !�r d ;him aracl he> jixd r h�nq( rt h'c5 r.F yuc si. to Comms rc.i.a1 �#e ghboriuvod. Hc? fe l L ,Lw(-) lc::L dental f`ac t L z t t< r c a res a`t ht•,rta l }apssarartrc_ ..uio!ald :Five 'lc!ss inptr.t usa the res�rdan* zal 4f{amiA i.e.s which "could .olc:cupy thu ar« a: FI<� -wot(2.ci :Lr�n�.t•r.aact a six Furst. '4'r s!t.o 0. and Fcit:hr.,wrauLd .b« .a:grfr!d -nei�jhhur'. k L a'� le i F't_flUPt1.l',1r M111IIt :; opril f1, 98o i',�r;c• :a r r, Is ROM �Y # S .. _ - _. - k_- ,: REBUTTAL r . Roger :,Anderson indicated that .the letter from s°M1r. -Newman . Was ,inappropriate. };ea,'.also ;stated .:that +the : project ..mzets .the criteria and requirements of the ";Code and should be approve_=d. AIso, 108th improvements shoie1&b :-determined'=by Washington County. iPUBLIC`'HEARING CLOSED ;o Commissioner Peterson was.:not in favor,.without' the . lots being 7500:square "-feet. 144e'fel-L`'.-the common-area :should ,be usable la.nd',and.that' there:was .a problem.,With="the stormdrainage. aCortiri�iss-loner ©utter:believed the! proposal .should`..be allowed-to .development. o` Corrrmissioner .Leverett and` Vanderwood�:cancUrred ,with Commissioner Peterson _and did. not-feel _the=densly was:-appropriarte`far`t`ree; project. o :Commissioner Fyre apposed the :deuelopment. }-fe 'falt the PD :overlay . Was intended` to -allow .for- oper-t .space . arid -innovative '.design: and .did not feel -the" proposal.met this requirement. Commissioner 'Vanderwor;d: moved -wind ."Commissioner: �?eterson seconded `to;,den PD -86, S �7--86, and .SL 4-86 : based on 'the " finding that the density .calculation is to °high "sand '-,proposal .doesn`.t neet ;the criteria ' for r Planned- Development. Also`, request staff a`final :tq, prepare : '•order and for Acting "Vice .-President Fyre .to sign .,off on fih«t f nal,•ordear., Motion [y carr i.ed :3by ,majority; nate of Commissioners present. Commissioner 'butler voting,,no. ;;RECESS 9:00 ?REC'ONVLME •?9:15 ";5.'3 Z ZONE .Of DlN#NU, AMENDMENT . ZOA-12-86 'TIGARD, COsMIUNITY.;DEVELOPMENT:CODE Request `.Lo :.amend :Sections 18:114.150 .and '18.148.040 to require that _the applicant submit names and addresses of .all property :owners " of record within ':250 :'feet " of `the site. .Also, a -- request ito amend Sections 88:120.090, x18.134.060, 38.140.060, .18:142.080, 18:144.080, 18:146.060, ,and 1181,162-070 to'.changL .. the notice: requirement from those-ownir+q property Within 100 feet to:those owning:proper.ty within'250�feet . " Senior -Planner Liden explained how this .:was a 'housekPeping : item to bring the .Codi, into conformance ,with Ordinance' 66-08 ;wteictz changes the .noti.ce '25q "feet. The 'Commission was requested to forward requirement tto recommendation to City Council. PUBLIC,1-ES1 IMONY u No one. appeared .to:speak. PUBLIC; }TEARING CLOSED' Cormi.ssi.ancar .Var.derwoad moved and Commsssiot�r r " Le ue re:t.t ,;v(,ondvd to forward ' ZOA 2-86 :;to 'Cit'y Council. wi Lh - a re commendation for aparvur�l Motion car•riud -unanimously try Cammi ssioners prism(.. P}.f�iilN Lylti r..(l(°1ClI a310N MINU1 ES t)}=r i 1 8, 198 N.tc3e? �r CITY1j OF TIGARD, 'OREGON COUNCIL iAGENDA ITEM-SUMMARY AGENDA O:: Sf5f86 . .. AGENDA ITEM #: --- DATE.SUBMITTED: -AZ21f£36 PREVIOUS ACTION: t3isd t".';ommittee ISSUE,/AGENDA: TITLE: An Ordinance Discussion and Recommendation P a irate i:he Seaser.Line Maintenance PREPARED BY: Jerri.Kidner tee ' Authorizing t"tonthljL SewerfStorm REQUESTED BY: ®ab Sean ` Drainage Sil l.ings, etc. • DEPARTMENT HEAD"OK, CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE City Council The addition or removal of revenue sources from the City 'tis,- a C y ^concern. Thi ordinance re Peals a' user, fee, `hut adds an interest charge and a �;enaiF:y fee. ,!INFORMATIOt,t SUMMARY The"Budget 1,Committee, recommended to City .Councilr the repeal of the sewer line Int intenance' `.fee r,and ' :the x conversion to monthly sewer bills. It was also ,.pointed out that. •L.he. City's,agreement with USA includes an 18%' interest charge on`delinquent,accounts and the City loses approximately 3% when sewer accouryts are:turnedover for.collection by the-tax assessor. The .attached Ordinance accomplishes the Budget Committee recommendation, ` .affirms''the -interestcharge or) delinquent accounts and :establishes a,penalty For. accounts turned over •to'"I shington County for collection. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Do nothing. 2. Prepare an:ordinance outlining' the recommendations. SUGGESTED ACTION I recommend-passage of`tae attached,ordinance. � SLW:c6/13n2F �4 ;p, CITY OF TIGARD, 'OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY t; �- - R AGENDA OF: MAY 5, 1986 AGENDA ITER D :St3€3fRITFED: April 24 19fl6 PREVIOUS ACTION: Revenue Manual ATE ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ORDINANCES IN— Discussion with Budget Committee CREASING STREET SDC FEES AND PREPARED BY: 22�LMi9 ,r'tin/J-erri Widner INCREASING 8USIN�SS TAX-FEES REQUESTED BY: Bb J-a ''DEPARTMENT'HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: ( i POLICY ISSUE The decision to increase rates. -- INFORMAT`ION `UMI MARY The Budget Committee reviewed Business Tax fees and Streets Systems Development Charges and has recommended an increase to City� Council ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Do Nothing. 2. Pass ordinances to increase the fees. SUGGESTED-ACTION Recommend passage of the attached ordinances increasing ' Business Tax and Streets :SDC fees. MEMORANDUM TO: • City Council April 25, 1986 FROM: Commuaity'Developm_pnt SUBJECT: Urban Punning Area Agreement . {UPAA} With Washington County Staff is meeting with Washington County on Monday, April ?8, 1986. All and-delivered to Council prior to the Play 5 meeting paperwar;� will be h � for your review. s. ybr a is �s. } CITY OF TIGARD OREGON: COUNCIL AGEMMA ITEM SUMMI ARY AGENDA 0: ` �9 y 1'386 AGENDA`ITEM 0: DA'fE'SUBMI TED: April 23� 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION' ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: C.I.P. Status PREPARED BY: Randall q. REQUESTED BY: CITY ADMIiUTST2ATO — DEPARTmEmT HEAD:OK: PoLZGY ISSUE t A report orgy the status of the various projects in the CIP and LID prograr�is. 6 TtFORPR i COi� SU��`�ARY � t report on CIS pro j ects as of April 21, 13#3b. I will Attached 'is the monthly P also be providing a brief oral -update at the day 5 meeting. As a resulfi of engineering war°h which has been completed, we will soon have more prel'iminar'y g' status report on the.CIP detailed cost ;figures and will be able to provide a f budget. AL a'ER dATIV_. ES Cv.,JSIDERED ;€E c report and oral report, no formal action required. Receive information 4 Take no action. �a SCI -STED ACTION 4 'Receive reports: no action rc�quirc�d (RRW br/2503P) Y Page .i z CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT April 21, 1986 s s ST-1 Resurfacing of Fairview Lane, Fairview Court & 116th Place Engineer'sreport recommends 1-1/2" overlay. Documents are being prepared to call for bids in May, with construction expected in June.< ST-2 Resurfacing of SW 68th Parkway Engineer's report recommends 1-1;2" overlay for the north portion of the project; this work will be bid 'wi.th :the ST-1 project. In the south portion of the project (from the curve to 66th Avenue), total reconstruction is required; because traffic volumes are low in the south portion (adjoining property is undeveloped), we propose to do only minor patching this year and postpone reconstruction to some future year. -ST--3 - North Dakota Street Resurfacin!3 and Recons•tructi.on {90th to 95th Due to special soils 'problems on this project, construction is being scheduled for dry weather in mid-summer. ST-4 SW 104th Avenue Reconstruction Some 'drainage questions need to be resolved before street design cani begin. We will be addressing the drainage problems during May. { _ ST-5 Commercial` Street Connection 7` This project is dependent on agreement of the property owners to : dedicate the required right-of-way. Discussions with the property (, f owners are continuing. €I . R: ST--6 - Tiedeman Avenue 'Realignment Discussions have begun with -the adjoining property owners in an attempt t to ' resolve right--of--way questions. The project will require both 4f right-of-way acquisitions and a minor channel change in Summer Creek. Preliminary engineering report' indicates that construction cost will be somewhat higher than originally estimated. ' Additional funding will need to be considered as we prepare the 1986-87 CIP in the coming weeks. ST-7 North Dakota Street Realiqnment at 118th Avenue Preliminary engineer's report is complete and will .be discussed with the property owners at the April 30th meeting NPO #7. Preliminary engineering ' report indicates that construction cost will be higher than originally estimated. Right-of--way acquisition will be required from � two parcels ST-8 Realicjnment of 79th Avenue at Bonita Road This project is being constructed in conjunction with development of F Mara bloods Subdivision. Agreement has been reached with -the developer regarding design standards and cost sharing r ST-9 - Main Street 'im rovement Study $' Engineering work will begin soon to determine pavement requirements on Main Street. ST-IO- - liunziker Street Realignment Study Engineer's report 3.s due in late April. Y Pave 2 °, 3 ST--11 Traffic Siqnal at Greenbearq Road' and Tiedeman Avenue Staffis preparing the necessary paperwork for submittal to ODOT (Oregon Department of Transportation). ST-12 •- Traffic Sinal at Scholls FerraL toad a tl 3o th i3akata S re2t The construction contract has been awarded by ODOT. Work should begin soon. ST-13 Traffic Sic;nal `at Burnham 'Street and tall Blvd. Staff is working to resolve procedural and funding questions with ODOT. ST-14 Traffic Signal at Nall Blvd, and McDonald Street 0€0T agreement was approved by Council, on April 14. Signals should be t working by late fall of this year. r ST-1S L.I_.£!. Flo. 85-1 mall Blvd. Street Inmrovements f - Bids were opened on April 17, 1986. Cid award is scheduled for Council consideration on April 28. ST-16' - L.I.D. No'. 35, SM. 68th P�jway F, Construction is proceeding with approximately 307. of the work completed, ST-17 - L.I.D'. No. 40, Dartmouth Street Extension Final` engineering design work has .begun.: t-lA - Pesc i is h9ic h !ay and Canterbury Lane Intersection Im�rrovement This is an ODOT project with possible City participation through an '. L.I.D. to 'improve access to adjoining businesses. Project scope is currently being reviewed by ODOT. F: i k= r.: h` (2503P) rf. . ." Page 3 Sewer master Plan Work not _yet started. r E ' t SS-.2 -• Pinebr'ook Seer Trunkline Repairs .scheduled to be clone in lay. Wor� ' SS-3 -_SW 69th Avenue Sewer Extension Project completed. G?•E•A. Trunk Access Paths � &forty scheduled 'or June. F' IA-+L-ins Avon-�a Sewer_t�c'Pair Work scheduled for May SS-�s I nn+f_____q Alin I and Inez Street Sewer L.I.D. Y Public heari, on L.I.Q. f0r�rnatiesn on April 28, !926. SS-7 - 74th Avenue ue and Cherr�t Cariu Seuaer L.I.D. 'Public hearing on f�.I.[3. for��,ation on APr ii 2s3; 1R8b. SS-9 - lmhust Snwer Extension Staff working to acquire necessary easements. r t (2503P) page 4 SD-1 — GaFarde Street and Canterbury Area (Drainage Improvements � Preliminary engineer's ,reportis complete. Staff is working to resolve some questions of legal responsibility before proceeding. i SQ-2 — 'Gentle Woods Channel Improvements Work will be done by pity crews when stream Flow levels permit. I PK-1 — Cook Park Drainage improvements on 92nd Avenue are completed. Street work in the I park is approximately 40% complete. Tho pedestrian bridge to the float has been ordered. 4 F : Pk-2 — Woodard bark Tables' and grills are being ordered c 3' R PK--3 summarcreek Trails Work to be alone in June. x j : z t i Page 5 CrP/LID PROJECT STATUS As Of PROJECT ra`TA`TLiS 5T1 PSD C EENTS PROJECT COMPLETION DATE LSgj c C .-d CP !moi 9n :. N -wi vt - A$ wi ST-1 - Fairview Resurface ST--m2,- SW 66th parkway Resurfa ST-3 - No Dakota Resurface 104th .Ave. Reconstruct — le ep ST-5 - Coumercial St. Connect ST-6 - 'Tiedeman Ave. Realign. ev��,�� _ ST-7 - No. Dakota Realign. ST-8 79th/Bcaonita Realign. r g s+¢ ;d _ bt9i aee 5rss ST-9 - Main St. Improve. Study ST-10- Hunziker' Realign, Study ST-11- Greenburg/Tiedeman ST-12- Schools Fry/No Dak Sign ST-11- Burnham/Hall ST--14_ Ha11 Mc-1), ct l-I ST-.16 S�!'68th P.eckwayLID � i`) ST-17-Dartmouth 1.1L) #40 PIW .' S'1-18- 99W/+.'a:1t.erhut y improve. { / t Cl P/I:ID PROJECT STATUS As Of PROJECT PROJECT STATUS ESTIMATED COMMENTS COMPLETION DATE C N C O � v7 U vi 131 a W �g Aa St2 £a. QV � G11> 6 SS-l. Sewer Master Plan f��s0/5/7 SS-2 Pinebrook Trunk Repairs SS-3 - SW 69th Sewer Extension empA?le- SS-4 - OEA Trunk Access Paths r �'r SS-5 - Watkins Ave. Sewer Eepa` SS-6 - 100th`inez Sewer LID �`a0� �� r�,��,�� SS-7 - 74th/Cherry Sewer LID SS-6 Elmhurst Sewer £xtensio It x i I t'3 .*`�'�,,k=ar=�'�Y',�`6�g'�':.i +�'"_�,.�.�'rv;�t.��'�`#":�i'�-`�-,,"'aT�i.'�`,� �.�:. '��.'�` �'�`�;��r�� z' �' +�.� a= �.iy...:*�,��#.��"-' L3'N:i :=��.;._..'�:a�c`�= � .�c��m�f�':�E. .x;�Sn x` ..��` .�, ��; ; �F �� s �� -,; �� ' �� ♦.� ��, ��. Y°.'�1 �2 f�C �ry}s � .� ��' � "�� : �' r �, :. _ _ � ,a � �� 7 �� d .>. .. � �, Pt •r �' '� ,* �� t i-- � - i ��-x -� `� � ,� ♦ � �"_ � � E� .� �� • s.��. !'�� , �� Y� � � ria�� »� � � . ..,. , �� y m+ � -� �� t"E�.� ��. '�� u �: �� k. '� fir ��Re �x ��"� � � t: �� y ��: ;+ r �� ' �, �, T �� t �9 �� S �py"if�� ,,,„ "f` .„ .,�v �4..7d,-�.�4r r ,;_ xs`"' f'a 'sx"s'%E-'; 's?�i _-�'c�,' YX�ats;rs�C�e{*zcta�;'SS's�u 4-..,,.:...a,`;�'az'tY �:. i., '�N,s }.J't -1Y_:a`'?` ya"''Yk�t {sa�"`5`' s�' 'nF �'.��.y "'c�`% ,.±°""`�-�"iary �"S-- _ ;�. �& ",: ma'''r `�'�'.=�3�'�.5�i;�7,t..�.,��*"�F" �y.-'�'3s.�r:3 y.` .. `^ s ,r a- Asx:, '�"``. ,`s�§'w" �,".'�.y.x+mac. iiy.%.5r �! � a�� - ..,,, r � �.' „.'.fit�"�K, `i.5., �, .v rx`+a� � "'�'F�-7'zC w.F s, - • t�'�'��3;, �.�: �,'�y, i �.x - � �3'� +�a.# �°r ,�°h�'* :ra .Sr�'_. ."� ...�st .,s,..t�_�,`,h, et.�i��s.....� ��s.. i,i'..�.r-y,,...wF.�`5.... � .._Ys��r.�.` �- �.�...��"z+..��r.-�: �.�.,�.,3z' c,:,�.tr.,.y.t!�,� ..-;._.,,..,-� -r.�.,, ...,�=..�5'.:s��..;?:.;�..:s:.�. .�..-+:T°v?�r..:�� APPLICATION SHOULD BE RECEIVED NOT LESS THAN 10 DAYS PRIOR TO EVEN OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION APPLICATION AND AUTHORITY TO OPERATE -SRB-SRW PPLICATION IS MADE FOR: Special Retail Beer @$10.00 per day No.of Days No. of stands OO NOT 1�tRITE ,�THIS SPACE XXXX Special Retail Wine @$10.00 per day No.of Days 1No', of stands i NOTE: Fee must be paid,by CHECK or N-10NEY ORDER PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT FIRMLY USING BALL POINT PEN 1, Applicant: Tieard Ars & Gi tfis Committee Phone 639-1182 ' License Type: special Retail Wine 2. TradeName 3. Person Responsible at Event Phone __6��_LLkI� 4. Mailing Address Prt_;; ��t�a7 CityxaZip 9 5. DATE(S) AND HOURS OF EVENT(S) May 16 1986 7 - 10:00 PM !_ 6. EVENT ADDRESS: 13125 Sty' Hall Blvd. CITY Tigard, OR Zip 97223 7. Type of Event: Auction & Reception 8.' Above location is Within City Limits XXX Outside City Limits kp. Boundaries of Event: Within the City Hall building u10. Meth I of supervision to insure compliance with liquor laws' TAG Committee members will supervise cervix of liquor. CL. 11. Expected Attendance: 150 - 200 people 12." I/Vile understand that a false or misleading;answer to any of the foregoing questions may subject this application to denial. I/We certify that all information submitted is complete and correct to'the best of my/our knowledge. l -_ i Signature(s) ucs ice^-.-��-� Date -c Jh ' Date 13. AUTHORIZATION BY PROPERTY OWNER/OPERATOR CONTROLLING PROPERTY own/control the property where this event is to be held.This application meets with my approval: Owner or Agent: 639-4171 Name r;ty of ' ;mar - get td Jean City Admin. Pone to1 ' ._ 2 Authorized Signature '� 1 -=-•-•� Data 14. RECOMMENDATION OF CITY (LICE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY SHERIFF' Oi FICE Recommendation: Grant eny Police Agency axstl e De artment PO Box 23397 Ti ard, OR 97223 � I Authorized Signature_tLY_ Date- As- 15. THIS AUTHORITY IS NOT /ALiD UNLESS SIGNEDBY AN OLCC REPRESENTATIVE License is Granted _ Recommend'Refuse Date Issued d O By _ Title W RESTRICTIONS - Fee Paid _ Receipt _J I (;p I r crm 84545a7a SEE BACK FOR INSTRUCTIONS t( (Re,12.85) 1 ADPL ICANI'S'.:OPY