Loading...
City Council Packet - 09/04/1985 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an SPECI MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate SEPTEML.'Z 4, 1985, 7:00 P.M. sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, FOWLER ...LOR HIGH ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start 10865 SW WALNUT of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items TIGARD, OREGON 97223 are asked to be kept to 2 minutes or less; longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by con- tacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 1. SPECIAL MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call` 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please) 3. PHONE SERVICE STUDY o Phone Consultant/Loreen Wilson 4. MSTIP - RESOLUTION NO. 85- 0 Director of Planning & Development 5. ANNEXATION PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT �- RESOLUTION NO. 85- 0' City Administrator 6. CODE REVISIONS Planning Commisson Ordinance No. 85 Park Board Ordinance No. 85- 0 City Recorder 7. PUBLIC HEARING: TEMPORARY USE TU 5x-85, LARRY SCOVILLE, NPO #3 Request to operate a used car buseinss for a period of one year. The applicant will display approximately 4 to 8 vehicles (all 1980 and newer) on the site. Located: 12885 SW Pacific Highway (Tax Map 2S1 2BD, Tax Lot 2101) o Public Hearing Opened o Summation by Planning Staff a Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation by Planning Staff o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council 8. PUBLIC HEARING: TEMPORARY USE TU 6-85, US NATURAL RESOURCES INC. R (IRVINGTON MOORE), NPO til Request to locate a temporary structure to be used as an office building for one year. Property is zoned I-L (Industrial Light). Located: 8205 SW Hunziker Street (Tax Map 2S1 1BC, Lot 200) r o Public Hearing Opened o Summation by Planning Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination F o Recommendation by Planning Staff o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council < COUNCIL AGENDA -'SEPTEMBER,4, 1985 - PAGE 1 9, PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 10-852 SCHOLLS WEST BUILDING, INC., NPO #2 Review Planning Commission's recommendation to annex 1.11 acres t into City City of Tigard, changing the zoning from: Washington County of Tigard IP. Located: 9730 SW Cascade Blvd. (Times' Building) (TaxMap 1S1 27DD,- Tax Lot 100) o Public Hearing Opened Summation by Planning Staff � Pro onents, Opponents, Cross Examination O Public Testimony. p o Recommendation by Planning Staff € o Public Hearing Closed 0 Consideration by Council o Resolution No. 85- p. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 12-85, PERRIN/SCHENK, NPO #2 i l the zoning Request to annex .80 acres into the CitR-5 f Tigard, y changing R-4.5. designation from Washington County Located; On 92nd Avenue. (Tax Map 1S1 SW North Dakota, north of SW d 35DB, Lot 8400) s o Public Hearing Opened o Summation by Planning Staff ,. Proponent S, Opponents, Cross Examination o Public Testimony Planning Staff' o Recommendation by o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-85 ZONE GRANGE 11. PUBLIC HE € ANNEXATION ZCA 11-85, KRUEGERchanging the Request to annex 41.64 acres into the City of Tigard'Residential 24 Comprehensive Plan designation from Washington County units/acre to City of Tigard Medium High Density and the Tzzoning Rf 25. Washington County Residential 24 units/acre to City Located: East of Murray 6Blvd.,01,e 602n boa, 1100,and Qw Scholis Ferry 1101, and portionof (Tax Map 1S1 33C, Lots , 1000) o Public Hearing Opened o Summation by Planning Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Gross Examination O Recommendation by Planning Staff o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council PUBLIC ' -ARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 8-85, ZONE CHANGE ZC 12. _ 9-85, ( 'fY (,F TIGARD Revie. Planning Commission's recommendation to ass b ig annexedointo Compre,,_,Isive Plan and Zoning designtions to property n the City. Plan Desig• Proposed Tax Map/Lot Existing Zoning/Coffip. _ R-4.5 Low Density lSl 35AC 3700 Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density 1S1 35AC 4400 Residential 5 units/acre R-�4.5 Low Density 1S1 35AC 3800 Residential 5 units/acre CP Comm. Professional lSl 35AC 2800 Office Commercial Cp Comm. Professional 1S1 35AC 101 Office Commercial Cp Comm. Professional 1S1 35AD 1400 Office Commercial R-4.5 Low Density Residential 5 units/acre COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 4, 1985 -- PAGE 2 1S1 35AD 1200 Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density 1S1 35AD 1300 Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density Also, a request to consider assigning the significant wetlands overlay designation to the following properties: Tax Map 1Sl 35AC, Lots 3700, 4400, 3800, 2800, 101; and Tax Map 1S1 35AD, Lots 1200,, 1300, & 1400. (NPO #4j o Public Hearing Opened o Summation by Planning Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation by Planning Staff o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council o Ordinance No. 85- 13. PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 7-85, CITY OF TIGARD Review Volume I =_Resource Document where it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Village Ridge Ravine. Also, review the Tigard Floodplain and Wetlands Map as it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge Ravine. o Public Hearing Opened o Summation by Planning Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation by Planning Staff o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council 14. SCROLLS FERRY ROAD PLAN DISCUSSION o Director of Community Development 15. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 15.1 Approve Council Minutes - 8/19/85 15.2 Receive and File Departmental Monthly Reports 15.3 Receive and File Community Development Land Use Decisions 15.4 Approve Budget Revisions & Contingency Approp. - Res. No. 85- 15.5 Receive and File Councilor Edin Letter to Mr. Lyster 15.6 Accept following easements & deeds for SW 69th Avenue between Atlanta & Pacific Hwy.: o Way W. Lee - Permanent Slope Easement & Warranty Deed q Oregon Education Association - Permanent Slope Easement & Warranty Deed 15.7 Approve Library Furnishings RFP & Call For Bid 15.8 Approve NPO #1 Fee Waiver Application 15.9 Appoint Southwest Corridor Policy Representative 15.10 Approve Council/Staff Training Workshop lb. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 17. ADJOURNMENT - lw/3131A 4 '�, ,_ COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 4, 1985 - PAGE 3 lL I T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 4, 1985 - 7:15 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Phil Edin, Jerry Edwards, and Ima Scott; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator (Arriving at 7:24 P.M.); Bill Monahan, Community Development Director, (arriving at 7:34 P.M.); Mark O'Donnell, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder. 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. Deputy Recorder requested following items be added, with understanding that City Administrator may place additional items on for consideration upon his arrival. .1 Attendance File Report .2 Memo Re: Oregon Planning Conference 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA No one appeared to speak. 4 PHONE SERVICE STUDY a. Deputy Recordersynopsized study efforts to date noting the hire of Info-Com Consulting, Inc. to assist with needs assessment, bid and award process. b. After a short question and answer period, Councilor Edwards moved to approve the Consultant's recommendation and direct preparation of RFP and authorize call for bid based on time schedule submitted to Council. Motion seconded by Councilor Scott. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. CITY ADMINISTRATOR ARRIVED: 7:24 P.M. 5. MAJOR STREETS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM -- Resolution No. 85- a. Bruce Warner, Deputy Director of Department of Land Use and Transportation for Washington County, synopsized issues and noted the implementation planned for the projects. b. After further discussion, Councilor Edwards stated he would support only because the voters should have the right to vote on the issue. Councilor Scott expressed concern regarding Tigard receiving fair benefit from funds collected, stating she does not support the issue, but wished the voters to have the opportunity to vote on the issue. Councilor Edin' questioned whether the Transportation Committee would have a different position on this issue if they had further F chance to study with Washington County. page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 4, 1985 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARRIVED: 7.34 P.M. L C Councilor Edwards moved to table issue to 985 the and request representative from Washington County givebefore gar Transportation Committee adequate information for study that date. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. d, Mayor Cook noted that the Transportation Committee would meet on 9/5/85 at 7:30 pM at Tigard City Hall. 6 ANNEXATION PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT a, Consensus of Council to table to 9/16/85 meeting, 7, CODE REVISIONS - Planning Commission & Park Board a. Deputy Recorder stated boards had requested attached changes through the Boardmanship Workshops in early Spring and recommended approval. b. ORDINANCE NO. 85-28 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AMENDING SECTION 2.08.031 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO VOTING REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE _ c, Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Scott to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. d. ORDINANCE NO. 85 -79 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MUDE AMENDING SEC©IN 212.020 OF TE� UIREMENTSF'FORT THE DP RK LAND LREECCREATION AINING BOARD TO MEETING NOTICE RE Q AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. seconded by Councilor Edin to adopt. e. Motion by Councilor Scott, Approved by unanimuus vote of Council present. 8, PUBLIC HEARING: TEMPORARY USE TU 5a-85, LARRY SCOVILLE, NPO #3 Request to operate a used car business for a period of one year. The applicant will display approximately 4 to 8 vehicles (all 1980 and newer) on the site. Located: 12885 SW Pacific Highway (Tax Map 2S1 280, Tax Lot 2101) a, Public Hearing Opened b, Staff noted Mr. Scoville was unable to attend meeting and 3. requested item continued to 9/23/85 for hearing. Mayor stated no one had signed up to speak. C. , seconded Motion by Councilor Edwards, by Councilor Scott to continue public hearing to 9/23/85 at 7:30 P.M. i �M1 . Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 2 — COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 4, 1985 9, PUBLIC HEARING: TEMPORARY USE TU 6-85, US NATURAL RESOURCES INC. (IRVINGTON MOORE), NPO #1 Request to locate a temporary structure to be used as an office building for one year. Property is zoned I-L (Industrial Light) Located 8205 SW Hunziker Street (Tax Map 2S1 18C, Lot 200) a. Public Hearing Opened }:r b, Associate Planner Newton synopsized request stating that Irvington Moore is upgrading the division by adding additional personnel and would require; the use of a mobile office trailer. Since this would result in the loss of 6-8 parking spaces, she encouraged Council to require the code parking requirements be met. C. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak. d. Planning staff recommended approval with parking code requirements being met for a 1 year period. d, Public Hearing Closed e. Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve 1-year temporary use request for mobile office with condition that all parking code requirements be met. 10. PUBLICM_F.ARiNG: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 10-85, SCHOLLS WEST BUILDING, INC., NPO 02 Review Planning Commission's recommendation to annex 1.11 acres into the City of Tigard, changing the zoning from Washington County MA 1 to City of Tigard IP. Located: 9730 SW Cascade Blvd. (Times' Building) (Tax Map ISI 27DD, Tax Lot 100) a. Public Hearing Opened b. Community Development Director synopsized issue and noted that Planning Commission recommended Council approve forwarding annexation request to Boundary Commission and that zoning designation be changed from MAI to IP upon annexation, C. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak. d. Public Hearing Closed e, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION FURTHERING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "A" AND z DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED. (Scholls West Building Inc.) ZCA 10-88 T f. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Edin to approve. h Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. z �t Rage 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 1985 11. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 12-85, PERRIN/SCHENK, NPO #2 Request to annex .80 acres into the City of Tigard, changing the zoning designation from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard R--4.5. Located: On SWNorthDakota, north of SW 92nd Avenue. (Tax Map 1S1 35DB, Lot 8400) a. Public Hearing Opened b. Director of Planning & Development outlined history of request noting the Planning Commission concerns over the inclusion of right-of--way of SW North Dakota in the annexation request. C. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak. d. Director of ' Planning & Development recommended approval of the request with direction from Council regarding the inclusion of the right-of-way of SW North Dakota. e. Public Hearing Closed f. Consensus of Council was to direct staff to prepare resolution to forward to Boundary Commission with zoning designation as outlined by Planning Commission without including any right-of-way in the request from SW North Dakota, This is to be brought back for Council approval on 9/9/85. 12, PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-85 & ZONE C14ANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 11-85, KRUEGER Request to annex 41.64 acres into the City of Tigard, changing the Comprehensive Plan designation from Washington County Residential 24 units/acre to City of Tigard Medium High Density and the zoning from Washington County Residential 24 units/acre to City of Tigard R-25. Located: East of Murray Blvd. , between Old and New Scholls Ferry Road (Tax Map 1S1 33C, Lots 600, 601, 602, 604, 1100, 1101, and portion of 1000) a. Public Hearing Opened b. Associate Planner Newton stated there were many changes in request from original public hearing on 8/6/85 before Planning Commission. Staff suggested that Council hold public hearing and determine whether or not additional property should be added to the proposal prior to submission to the Boundary Commission. C. Public Testimony: Opponents o Gale Stover, Route 1, Box 381, Beaverton, expressed opposition to - annexation into City of Tigard noting Beaverton School District and water already in area. She stated Mayor Larry Cole of Beaverton has stated he felt 'mislead' regarding the annexation of AUk this area to Tigard. Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 4, 1985 s� o Brad Hodges, Route 1, Box 364A, Beaverton, stated concerns regarding development in the area and wished to no become a part of`Tigard. He wanted to continue to have access to Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District. Proponents: o Ryan O'Brian, 209 NE Lincoln, Hillsboro, noted he had petitions signed now for, 13 lots and felt that another one or two would be signed within a short time. d. Motion bu Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Edwards to continue consideration of issues to 10/14/85 and require readvertisement of the hearing based on the new signatures with required notice being sent to surrounding property owner. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. e Councilor Edwards suggested staff meet with landowners in area and discuss issues and answer questions before the 10/14 hearing, RECESS: 8:54 P.M. RECONVENE 9:20 P.M. 13. PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 8--85, & ZONE CHANGE 7.0 9-85, CITY Of TIGARD Review Planning Commission's recommendation to assign the following Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to property being annexed into the City. Tax Map/Lot # Existing Zoninq/Camp. Plan Desig, Proposed 1S1 35AC 3700 Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density 151 35AC 4400 Residential 5 units/acre R--4.5 Low Density ISI 35AC 3800 Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density 1Sl 35AC 2800 Office Commercial CP Comm. Professional 1S1 35AC 101 Office Commercial CP Comm. Professional 151 35AD 1400 Office Commercial & CP Comm. Professional Residential 5 units/acre & R-4.5 Low Density 1S1 35AD 1200 Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density ISI 35AD 1300 Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density Also, a request to consider assigning the significant wetlands overlay designation to the following properties: Tax Map 1S1 35AC, Lots 3700, 4400, 3800, 2800, 101; and Tax Map 1S1 35AD, Lots 1200, 1300, & 1400. (NPO /14) a. Public Hearing Opened b. Director of Community Development synopsized request and noted r zoning is proposed to be designated to the closest City designation sem. from County zoning. y�* tf Paige 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 4, 1985 x C. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak. o Letters From Don & Hazel Lyon, 10440 SW 87th Avenue, & Shirley Rowe, 10370 SW 90th, were received noting concern regarding drainage issues in area. d, Planning Staff recommended approval based on the Planning Commission's vote. e. Public Hearing Closed f. ORDINANCE NO. 85-30 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 8-85) AND ZONE CHANGE (ZC 9-85) (DAVIS) AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. g. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt. Motion approved by 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay. Ordinance will require second reading at the 9/9/85 meeting to become effective: 14. PUBLIC NEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 7-85, CITY OF TIGARD Review Volume I -- Resource Document where it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Village Ridge Ravine.' Also, review the Tigard Floodplain and Wetlands Map as it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge Ravine. a. Public Hearing Opened b. Planning Staff synopsized request which was originally initiated by Mrs. Geraldine Ball. C. Public Testimony: o Mrs. Geraldine Ball, 11515 SW gist Avenue, appeared as a concerned citizen noting the correction she wished to have regarding Red Rock Creek and Village Ridge Ravine. She read into the record a letter outlining these concerns. She requested Council approve the amendments. d. Planning Staff supported the request but recommended the changes be addressed during the upcoming Comprehensive Plan Review. e. Public Hearing Closed f. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Scott to have the issues regarding Village Ridge Ravine & Red Rock Creek included in the Comprehensive Plan Review scheduled for this fall. 15 SCNOLLS FERRY ROAD PLAN DISCUSSION a. Director of Community Development discussed proposed conceptual plan as noted on map (enclosed in Council support material) showing the location of existing and planned' intersections' along Scholls, as well as potential" Murray Road extension alternatives through ' Tigard. He reported the Transportation Committee will see the plan and staff will continue progress on the issue with` a zone overlay ready for.Council discussion on 9/16/85. Pac3e 6 — COUNCIL MINUTES — ,SEPTEMBER 4, 1985 16. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 16.1 Approve Council Minutes 8/19/85 16.2 Receive and File Departmental Monthly Reports 16.3Receive and File Community Development Land Use D,�.. isions 16.4 Approve Budget Revisions'& Contingency Approp. Res. No. 85-70 16.5 Receive and File Councilor Edin letter to Mr. Lyster 16.6 Accept ` following easements & deeds for SW 69th Avenue between Atlanta & Pacific Hwy. : o Way W. Lee - Permanent Slope Easement & Warranty Deed o Oregon Education Association Permanent Slope Easement & Warranty Deed 16.7 Approve Library Furnishings RFP & Call For Bid 16.8 Approve NPO #1 Fee Waiver Application 16.9 Appoint Southwest Corridor Policy Representative 16.10 Approve Council/Staff Training Workshop a. Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Edin to remove items .4, .6, .7, 9, & .10 and approve the remain items on the Consent Agenda._ Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. b. Item 16.4 Consideration Councilor Scott stated she did not support the use of WCCLS funds for Library furnishings in the Civic Center since the voters approved a $2.2 million project. Councilor Edin stated he had researched the issue and would support this item because it make 'economic sense' however does so reluctantly. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Edin to approve Resolution No. 85-70 making adjustments to the 85-86 budget. Approved by 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay. C. Item 16.6 Consideration Mrs. Geraldine Ball expressed concern that in the design stage of 68th/Parkway LID the flows of Villa Ridge Ravine and Red Rock Creek should be addressed. She favored the easements and deeds being accepted by the City. Staff will notify engineer of concern. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Edin to accept and authorize signatures. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. ; .. d. Item 16.7 Consideration Head Librarian Ertell presented request for bidding the library furnishings for the Civic Center location. Page 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 4, 1985 s Lot #1 would include wooden furniture and lot #2 would include metal shelves and stack lighting , for the Library. The proposal was to open bids on September 30th and adjust the remaining lots as necessary to stay within budget Informal quotes would be requested for additional lots after bid opening. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve bid on lots 1 6 2 and then administratively review the remaining lots. Approved by 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay, e. Item 16.9 Consideration Council discussed who would be available to attend the SW Corridor Study Policy Committee meeting on 9/5/85 at 7:30 AM. Councilor' Edwards stated he would try to attend at least a portion of the meeting. f Item 16.10 Consideration City Administrator discussed cost and agenda for the Council/Staff Training Workshop scheduled for October 12th & 13th, Councilors Scott and Edin were concerned with Executive Staff time compensation. Councilor Edwards expressed concern with $900 cost for professional trainer to attend. Councilor Scott wished to stay within the City limits for these kinds of meetings. Consensus of Council was to table discussion to the 9/9/85 meeting for further deliberation. 17. NON—AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 17.1 COUNCIL. ATTENDANCE FILE City Administrator noted that an error was corrected on the report of Council attendance and that Councilor Scott was attending the 9/21/85 executive session. 7. 17.2 PLANNING CONFERENCE FOR CITY ADMINISTRATOR ATTENDANCE City Administrator stated the funds were budgeted and requested Council approval to attend the Conference in Eugene on October 3rd and 4th. Councilor Scott moved to deny the training request. Motion was seconded by Councilor Edin. Further discussion was regarding Administrator's Contract right to attend training workshops. City Administrator waived his employment contract language which requires training to be approved in this instance. Motion to deny request was denied 2-1-1. Mayor Cook voting nay` and Councilor` Edwards abstaining• the issue is considered . , deadlocked. Page 8 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 4, 1985 17.3 COUNCIL CALENDAR City Administrator stated that the October 21st meeting may be cancelled due to a lack of quorum if Councilor Brian is still ill. Councilor Edwards will report to Administrator shortly as to whether he could beavailablefor that meeting. 17.4 RECEIVE AND FILE LAND USE DECISION Director of Community Development requested Council receive and file another land use decision, MLP 10-85, for the record. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Scott to receive and file. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 17.5 MISCELLANEOUS Director of Community Development distributed the following items for Council information, o Japanese & English versions of theeconomicdevelopment pamphlet prepared by staff in conjunction with the Japan-American Conference of Mayors and Chamber of Commerce Presidents. o Memorandum from Public Works regarding the use of GM Training Center Classes, 17.6 LABOR NEGOTIATIONS ISSUE Councilor Scott requested to discuss issue from Executive Session regarding staff and union representatives. After lengthy discussion regarding whether this item should be discussed in open meeting, Legal Counsel requested that this be scheduled for 9/9/85 Executive Session. He further recommended that Councilor Scott address the particular issues to Tim Ramis. City Attorney, and City Administrator before that Executive Session so that all issues could be addressed. Councilor Scott requested that Bob Jean, Jerri Widner, and Joe Grisham be present at the Executive Session. 18. ADJOURNMENT: 10:41 P.M. 0 eputy City Recor4ir — City of Tigard ATTEST: City T gard lw/3194A Page 9 — COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER A, 1985 x 17� TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice 7-6481 ' BEAVERTON.OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising • a ❑ Tearsheet Notice City of Tigard '0F y3 o PO Box 23397 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit TlG'gR� Tigard, OR 97223 AFIADAVIT OF PUBLICATION z_ STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )as. I, ThPrPr,aRntrhs,r being first duty sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director,or his principal clerk, of the Ti gid' Times a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020;published at in the aforesaid county and state;that the Puha jyotiae a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for —successive and consecutive in the following issues: AASRE 29 1985 Subscribed an to before me this August 29, 1985 r -t Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 9/20/88 AFFIDAVIT z � t .F TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Leggy _ P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 - Notice 7-6477 - BEAVERTON.OREGON 97075 PUBM AXARWO Legal Notice Advertising A s F, FCF/ 'Pht`lotioor�alldt o ,iaafc e • O Tearsheet NoticeLF bet'1+1865 at T�41�.?d.at a /+ d lem SW-W Street.Tom. City of Tigard r heWs,ttuiR9 Rceoat >7 • O Duplicate Affidavit e OF -``. Oga bQ17 PO Sox 23397 ,Tigard, OR 97223 0 l/L,Nfl2d"u �ReQacsf!tm.a*metc'80 arsat 1+�4 t4 soate8 �faatalii AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION j> PpRAI?tY liSfs'111 ► STATE OF OREGON. ? Re 19R COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Asa. ; aaeal Jacquelyn AgeeA'— being first duly sworn,depose and say that 1 am the Advertising Director,or hia principal clerk,of the__Mj_gaxc3 mi mPc _ =114$ newspaper a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 ,m$ o1 and 193.020:published et. S agar a in the _ aforesaid county and state;that the Y±:ttei k .toIdt�t" 4A1 a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,wasublished in the me P entire issue of said newspaper for—____--I--successive and F s t18D,sa4tpstifDtt Ofd t consecutive in the following issues: gwit'ft►f+!ltt ab 19 8 5 . 3Y8k r .. V*W A .. Subscribed a o before me thi. Auk t 22, 198 e seSasltltot>3s� atm 14 Notary Public for Oregon i >t My Commission Expire*:9/20 88 f Wald i AFFIDAVIT i tmdt a ►� 40. V -y lfr't ii4Aflow:ptr�I,� _ 9Sp!Lot � '" €? Wax AGENDA ITEM f{ — — VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE q/4/85 (Limited`t minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED r DATE 9/4/85 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: Please print the information) Item Description:^ 1# 7 -/PUBLIC HEARING TEMPORARY USE TU 5a-85 Larry Scoville Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation r� � i � DATE 9/4/85 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: #8 PUBLIC HEARING TEMPORARY USE TU 6-85 US Natural Resources Inc. Irvington Moore Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation DATE 9/4185 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: #9 PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 10-85 Scholls West Bldg, Inc. Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation DATE 9/4/85 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: 410 ,PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 12-85 Perrin/Schenk Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation DATE 9/4_ I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: X111 -t PUBLIC HEARING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-85 & WNE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 11-85 Kruger Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation Gal Stoyf-r, -Areci t cs)d-t P's- e Pr`h) r'� `bz-r t a 3 6?;,1- NW, f f}- r DATE 9/4/85 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following ite m, -.."ease print the information) . Item Description: PUBLIC HEARING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 8-85 & ZONE CHANGE ZC 9-85 City of Tigard Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation DATE 9/4/85 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the followingite Please print the information) Item Descripti 4#13 PUBL.IC HEARING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 7-85 City of Tigard Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address andAffiliationName, Address and Affiliation w0jL9 p LSo LK TIC Ar71h CITY OF TIGARD,' OREGON _ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED August 29, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Phone Service Study PREPARED BY: Bob Jean REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Should the City use the existing phone/intercom system in the new Civic Center or is a different system necessary. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Consultant's report is attached. The existing system is inadequate to meet our needs in the Civic Center, and it would have a 5-year cost of $50,700 and a 10-year cost of $135,000. The recommended system which would meet our current needs and expend to future needs has a 5-year cost of $60,000 and a 10--year cost of $70,000. The recommended system also reduces the number of phone trunks from 14 to 12 while expending network access, thus minimizing future costs under local area measured service and some long distance.. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Move and install to current GTE-60 system. 2. Bid and install per the Consultant's recommendation. (Note: FY 85-86 Budget estimates were $43,000 vs. the Consultant's pre-bid estimate of $49,245. Depending on bid award, the difference would come from Contingency.) SUGGESTED ACTION Review the Consultant's recommendation with them and direct preparation of a bid call as scheduled (83:pm/0962P) -a� MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0: Joy Martin, Civic Center oordinator August 8, 1985 FROM: Loreen Wilson, Recorder SUBJECT: Phone System Timeline The phone system deadline has been formalized and set for a cutover date of January 31 to February 7, 1985. It is essential that each step of the process stay on this schedule to achieve the targeted cutover date. STEP RESPONSIBILITY OF DATE DUE Needs Assessment & Options Recommended Consultant, LW/PM 08/22/85 Adopt Recommendation For Type of System Exec Staff Decision 09/03/85 RFP/Bidding Process Requirements For City LW/DH 09/05/85 (Our portion of contract written) Council Meeting/Authorize Bid Process Council 09/09/85 _ RFP Written Consultant,LW/PM 09/23/85 RFP Typed & Copied LW/PM 09/27/85 ;. RFP Available For Vendors Consultant 09/27/85 (Council will receive and file RFP on Consent at the 10/14/85 meeting) City's Contract Language Finalized LW/DH/Attorney 10/11/85 (Will need to be revised slightly after vendor chosen) Bid Opening Consultant, LW/DH 10/18/85 Bid Recommendation Consultant 11/01/85 Bid Recommendation Consideration Exec Staff/LW/PM 11/04/85 Bid Award/Contract Authorization Council 11/11/85 Contract Signed W/Vendor and City LW/DH 11/18/85 Delivery of System Vendor 01/17/86 Cut-Over — upon completion of building Consultant/Vendor/ 01/31/86 to LW/PM 02/07/86 lw/3046A CC: Bob Jean Council . .� Exec. Staff r' Consultants L„.Patt Martin' l { Info-Com Consulting, Inc. August 22, 1985 9045 SM, Barbur Blvd Suite 4 Portland, Oregon 97219 503-246-1695 Loreen-Wilson Deputy City Recorder City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 k. Dear Loreen; t - We want to thank you for the opportunity to work with you and your staff." We appreciate the cooperation of your staff and their assistance in providing the information needed for this report. Enclosed is your report- and recommendation. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call. Yours truly, Catharine A. Berbold Adell Rollie Enclosure t F t f fTABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE f. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I ( RECOMMENDATION f Statement` of Task 2 3 Methodology Communicdtions System 'E 9 Issues 19 Network 20 CONCLUSION a: -14 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Tigard hired Info-Com Consulting, -Inc, to _investigate their telecommunication needs and provide a recommendation to meet these needs at the new Civic Center location. We have analyzed both your network and communication system by reviewing records, conducting interviews with key personnel, meetings with various vendors and our own expertise and background in telecommunications. We have recommended the following course of action: The City of Tigard should purchase a single system to serve all departments within the City. They should utilize a shared network concept to gain network optimization. They s� should continue to utilize GTE for long distance services A- while taking advantage of the increased network access to Washington County and reduce their costs. 4 s fy l� ! d z RECOMMENDATION ,A 4 STATEMENT OF TASK Info-Com consulting, Inc. was hired by the City of Tigard to investigate their telecommunication needs and provide a recommendation for meeting those needs at the neva Civic Center i' location. We analyzedyourneeds in light of the "following considerations: ,i 1. Centralized -vs- Decentralized Communication System 2< Long range growth plans 3. Relocation of City Services to new Civic Center J 4 . Functional -vs- Cost _i r � i c 4 4 METHODOLOGY r j' In order to perform the above task we needed to review the present system, determine organizational needs, review the relevant documents and make a recommendation. SYSTEM REVIEW , Records In order to determine needs, we reviewed the present system. We requested records from the City of Tigard and General Telephone. With this information we were able to analyze traffic and long distance needs. We also built our own records to assure ourselves that we had an accurate picture of the present communication system. This required floor plans and "key sheets" of the present system, locating all present` lines, sets and any auxiliary equipment. It" acted as an initial introduction into communication needs. -It also insured that we had all . equipment needs documented. Needs Assessment To determine system needs, we performed a needs assessment. =a It is our view that the only way to develop an understanding `, of communication needs is to go directly to the user. Interviewing, we are convinced, is the only effective Z method. Forms, all too often, limit the information which s the user can provide about his specific needs. In determining needs there is a gap between a user's understanding of the available technology, the potential ` applications and his needs. _ l : E. n Furthermore, it is hard for a form to encourage a `user to move beyond how he "does it now" to how he might do it. Users don't realize that their present methods of operation are usually the result of technological limitations, not job requirements. Using an interview process, we can suggest applications, spot technology restrictions, answer questions and encourage .users_to" think creatively about their needs. We can also combat misinformation and separate out training ( problems, and staff problems from system problems. Consequently, we conducted on-site interviews for every department. We also put together new floor plans and detailed records of present equipment. These records enable us to see overall communication patterns, spot potential question areas and understand department structure. Armed with this knowledge we interviewed at least one person f from every group of users which has a community of i. information needs. We were looking -for-the following kinds of information: r 1. External communication needs and call handlingappropriate problems. Are calls being directed to the appro p people quickly and smoothly, are they being handled well if the appropriate people are unavailable? Are ( there areas where calls are concentrated and available personnel are not able to handle them? Is the public ,f being well served? 2. Internal communication needs. Do people receive messages? Do they have ready access to the outside world? Can they reach people internally. 1 3. Communication needs unique to the City of Tigard and 44.. their specific organizational requirements. l b 4. Enhanced feature requirements and applications. The applications we look for are the following: Automated Message Center: Using the data base resident in the communications system as to station number and person' s name to have an on-line centralized message center. A message comes in, the person at the message center enters the message with the person's extension number and the message is automatically printed out on a printer located in the person's department. Automated Directory: Using the same data base to allow an attendant to call up employees names on a terminal and determine their station number and address. t Calendaring: Using the same data base to keep an on-line calendar of everyone in the organization so that the message center will have additional information as to a person's whereabouts. Teleconferencing: The ability to conference on a series of locations with two way speakers to allow for conferences at different locations. Voice Mail: The ability for people to leave verbal messages on a recording device which automatically notifies the appropriate station with a message light. When the message is retrieved, the system automatically retrieves the appropriate message for the appropiate station. Data Switching: The ability to "switch" data lines so that a single terminal may access more than one computer by dialing a telephone number. This can reduce the number of terminals needed and the number of modems. It is useful in a distributed ?( environment in which a company has more than j� one computer or a network of small personal computers. , Voice/Data Integration: The ability to use the telephone wires for transmitting voice i and data simultaneously. This can reduce the investment in cable plant. 5. Personnel versus system problems. We also try to identify personnel and organizational methods which may have a' negative impact on j the organization's ability to make full use of a telecommunications system. Staffing is a managerial decision. It is our job to provide ( the technology to support staffing policy. ( However, we must indicate technological limitations which will impact staffing policy. ! 6. Cost issues in terms of long distance, equipment inventory and call billback to project needs. i With this information we can formulate an ideal design. We can estimate costs and determine how best to have a system which can meet your needs. We would like to stress, f however, that until we have an RFP response in hand, all cost figures are estimates. f I 3 t z� COMMUNICATION SYSTEM E The City of Tigard is currently served by four separate telephone systems They are: 1. City Half This is served by a GTE 60XF PBX system and currently covers { all City Hall functions such as: + City Administration Planning & ,Development Finance & Services/Court This is provided by GTE under a monthly service arrangement. 2. Public Works This is a small key system that is provided by GTE on a monthly arrangement. This location is connected to City Hall by-gone off "premise extension, i i 3. Library This is served by four single line sets and two business 1, lines and is on a monthly rental from GTE. 4. Police Department �'. This is a key system provided by GTE on a monthly rental arrangement. This department has emergency services access (911 and Washington County Sheriff Department) that is part of this system. The Police Department provides an emergency generator for back-up power to support their communication system. i The costs for these systems are: ( 1. City Hall 60 month service agreement $467.80 r Variable monthly cost 237.88 ' Telephone set rental 50.21 1._ sub-total 755.89 2._ Public Works 94.40 .r 3. Library 9.20 4. Police Department 243.65 . . TOTAL Equipment Costs 51,103.14 3 -7- r 5 r: f . These costs equate to $45,137 .00 over a five year period. (The acceptable life of a telecommunications system. ) The PBX service provided for City Hall is under a 60 month service agreement which was signed in october of 1981. This provides a -fixed monthly rate of '$467.80' for 60 months. In addition, a variable monthly rate of $� applies. GTE will continue to provide this service at the va cable rate (subject to tariff increase) but retains ownership of this equipment. The agreement has a liability clause in which the City agrees to pay a termination fee if the system is disconnected prior to the 60 t month term of the contract. Therefore, if the City chooses to disconnect, as an example, in February of 1986 the liability would be $3,745.00. s t t I I f - ISSUES ! 1. Shared versus Separate System The sharing of a telecommunication system is generally done" for, the following reasons: Enhanced Services a. Internal Communications A single telecommunication system offers you the ability to internally communicate without the need of tieing dap costly telephone lines: A FOR EXAMPLE: The City Administrator wishes to call the Police ( Chief k 'Current System y The current system farces users to place calls between departments by using the telephone lines. This is costly and as you continue to grow will continue to escalate your costs. With separate systems more lines are :required to accomodate this calling. �C Y� 9_ Centralized System IVZ.&PA6 fig t Y.9 MINI C2TY gpaLiTAZ :t. With a Centralized system calls can be completed without the need to go outside your telephone system. ion while This can provide better internal communicat allowing better access to the City by its constituents. This can also mean controlling a future expense that can occur when measured service becomes a reality. b. New Technology The sharing of a new system can also allow users to take advantage of today's technology with features such as: Automatic Route Selection/Station Detail Recording: This provides a management tool for your network by providing most cost effective routing for your calls. This can be combined with call detail by station for cost control. The review of your network does not indicate _ that automatic route selection would be beneficial. An interest has been expressed in adding call detail recording. The costs to add this can range from $2,500 to $20,000. Based on j your current network we would not recommend !. adding this at this time. -10= C. Office Automation Technology: The latest PBX technology views the PBX as part of an information management system which will provide the wonders of the "automated office" . Integrated` voice/data, electronic mail, calendaring, messaging, etc. are features r designated to facilitate the automated office. y In our decissions with your staff they did not identify any application for the City. i ,t Sharing a Network When a PBX system is shared by users with similar communities of interest, it becomes advantageous for them to share a network to derive economic benefit. With separate telephone systems your network costs are higher. Your current systems require more network to I support each department. This results in increased costs. This problem will remain with you as the City of Tigard grows and in fact will increase. To obtain a maximum benefit for the City from a shared network all calls should be placed through a centralized network. This configuration would look like this: 1 4 �SX� 4v.BtsC �✓vl��g 7�` ass srl: nape LT-- — _ — — ------ ` i Lr c This would allow users to place and receive calls through a shared system and network and be able to call each other without attendant involvement in the call . The benefit to this is reduced network costs. The problem of receiving calls when the attendant is not available can be managed by assigning night connects to specific departments, (such as Library, Police and Public Works) , for after hour calling. This meansspecific-telephone lines are directed to user groups (in system software) therefore allowing callers to reach departmentsafter hours. One potential problem with this is that these lines may be limited in their hunting ability. We have provided direct access to users in Public Works via off premise extensions. This allows these users to share in the pooled network and allows call completion directly to them. The City can add the entire communisation system to the emergency generator that it is acquiring to ensure that emergency services can continue should a commercial power failure occur. Loreen Wilson has indicated that it would require only two seconds to begin generation and therefore additional battery back-up does not appear to be required. We estimate network monthly costs for this arrangement of $667.00 and this includes direct access to users in Public Works. sts(These 911costs or WashingtonlCountyDSheriff' s line,; o access nor c The City staff feels that a separate network should be t maintained for Police Department calls. This can be added to the system allowing calls to come direct to the d cost for this network design is department and the estimate $783.00 per month. One additional option would be to provide the Library with its own separate network. This could increase network costs by an additional $116.00 per month. The problems that result from deconsolidated network is cost and additional call hand primarily increased concern regarding emergency lin sWith the Police Departments ll would be appropriate to have these calls only handled once within their department. These .outgoing calls would use the pooled facility resources of the system. In the future though, should this dispatch function be contracted to another service, the City could, at that time consolidate more of their network Z4 -13- 1 We feel that a shared network is the optimum arrangement for { obtaining ,cost benefit In addition, we feel that a single attendant could manage this system but would recommend that message taking be managed in the departments. r I i _ i C r F t - ; i t A �R f -14- t' a System Administration F Sharing a telecommunications system can reduce the duplication of equipment and personnel in management of the F system. The PBX technology of today allows the user to, become more involved in the management of software changes on their system. A single system would allow the City to take advantage of this. In our discussions with your staff we found you .made limited changes and therefore felt it ='(( would be of little value to you, i The actual management of your system is another area that must be considered in this process. A single system would allow this to be slightly less complicated but 'none the less, it must be addressed. By management of a telecommunications system we mean the actual administration of your system. This requires an understanding of the technology in telecommunications and the ability to apply it to your business. This is the single largest source of problems in telecommunications systems we see today and unfortunately it is the single largest•,gap we see in the telecommunications area. The post-divestiture environment seems to be leaving this area of system management to slipping through the cracks. The vendors are not staffed to manage this for individual [ customers. This requires going through the interview tk process we have just completed on a proactive basis. Without this commitment a telecommunications system will rapidly beome non-functional. you just experienced one problem like this with callers dialing out after hours. A simple training step resolved the problem. This ares of 'system management can be addressed in the \ following ways: a Train someone, internally in telecommunications application design/management. b. Retain a firm like Info-Com to `manage your system. V= �e -15- 2. Does Your Existing System Meet Your Needs? The systems that serve the City of Tigard can be purchased for the following: Purchase GTEXF PBX $30,000.00 Contract pay off (as of 2/86) Purchase/install Police Dept. Rey System 3,890.00 Library System 550.00 Public Works (purchase only) 1,276.00 TOTAL 3S In addition, GTE estimates maintenance at $4.00/$5.00 per station line. pe- The problems with these systems from a functional point of view are: a. Growth The GTE 60XF system capacity is 16trunksand 60 stations. i The City of Tigard has forecasted growth for all departments in the next five years at approximately ( 100 system users. Therefore, this system would not be considered a viable alternative for the entire City. The key systems and Library system do not meet the projected growth forecasts either. b. Back-up Positions i The current system only allows single line sets. This creates coverage problems for back-up positions as it does not allow them to know where the call is coming from. A simple busy lamp on a multi-button set provides this back-up information. C. Call Detail Recording This is not available on this system. d. The internal communication ability within systems is limited at best and in the future additional growth in the City will likely create further problems and t increased costs. The answer then is that your current system does not meet t the City's needs. �, -lb- Functionality Versus Costs - In considering this area costs represent the following: 1 A. System Costs` B. Costs Associated With Communicating Internally i As we discussed earlier the limited internal communication problem will continue to be of even more concern in the future when Measured Service becomes a reality. Today we know that each call between departments ties up two I telephone lines (For Examples between Police and Public Works). In the future this problem will remain with you and in fact will represent increased network costs with separate systems. Another functional problem that separate systems create is the caller dialing the wrong number. In order to transfer a { call that reaches the Police Department that belongs in City Hall the caller must be told to hang-up and re-dial a different number. This creates a poor service level for your constituents. With the new central locationofyour services- it would be less confusing and provide a better level of service by centralizing your system and network. The City has also requested that the building inspection E department have calls directed to an answering device. This can be done by having the attendant transfer calls to the device. For a comparison of single versus shared systems we asked one vendor to provide a cost for comparative purpose. In a verbal response the cost difference was $3,000.00 in favor of separate systems. If the City needs to add one additional telephone line to its system over the next five years the cost at todays rates would be $3,480.00. It is highly likely that given your projected growth rate the cost to communicate system to system could be considerably higher. r Therefore, we recommend that the City of Tigard purchase one system to serve all four Departments. Based on our experience we feel that an average cost for this would be $700.00 -- $900.00 per station line. (Based on $700.00 per station line, with 65 station lines it would be $45,500.00. ) in addition to this cost a maintenance agreement would be required in year two. This cost we estimate at $3.50 per station line or $227.50 per month. Network costs are not i considered in these figures. 1 Network The network for the City of Tigard is provided by General Telephone and consists of the following: ti 1. City Hall Monthly 6 Central Office Lines $352.16 1 Off Premise Ext. to 14.52 Public Works 35.79 Modem 2. Public Works 1 Central Office Line 58.29 r 3. Library 2 Business Lines 83.58 4. Police Department 5 Central Office Lines 291.45 2 Private Lines for LEDS 24.00 Total $859.79 In addition to this the City of Tigard uses this network for � ., its long distanc6 calls. The May cost for this service was $448.72 We have evaluated your network based on functionality versus cost. We recommend a new system design that would centralize your network through a single system. We have discussed the costs in more detail earlier in this report. The costs for this system would then incorporate a pooled resource for all departments with the exception of direct lines to the Police Department. Monthl Install 12 Central Office Lines $696.00 $480.00 6 Off Premise Extensions 87.00 300.00 F. Total 783.00 780.00 _ (These costs do not include LEDS, 911 access, and Washington County Sheriff access. ) } * Installation figures are only estimates. ' .. _ . _ The next area we' looked at is your long distance usage. As a result of an up-coming change in Washington County' s telecommunication system the City of Tigard will have more access to Washington County via their toll free services. We estimate a potential savings of $85.00 ,per month once this becomes available to you. We evaluated the remaining amount of your usage , to determine if an alternative, carrier would be appropriate. Raon oul the limited potential for savings in this area we would y` recommend you continue to use your existing carrier. nr e L Y t t' CONCLUSION As a result of our analysis and our background and experience,_ Info-Com Consulting, Inc. has made the following recommendations: The City of Tigard purchase a single PBX system to provide 1 service for all departments. This would include those departments moving to the new Civic Center as well as serving Public Warks via this system. We estimate annual costs to be: Fe System Costs New System Cost $45,500.00 10 920. Maintenance .s 00 l�j -w'' u 60 Month Projected Costs $56,420.00 Contract pay-off of existing system (as of 2/86) 3,745.00 TOTAL $60,165.00 ; s Network Costs 12 Central office Lines 6 Off Premise Extensions $785.00 per month Long Distance cost we project an estimated .annual savings of $1,020.00, based an utilization of Washington County's increased F network access. In addition, we recommend that the City of Tigard assume a s proactive approach in management of their telecommunications sytem. _ 5. s CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY { AGENDA OF: August 19 1985 AGENDA ITEM #. DATE SUBMITTED: August 14, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: NONE ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Maior Streets Transportation Improvement Program PREPARED BY William A Monahan (MSTIP) REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: W A.h RCS' CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Washington County, inconjunctionwith the local jurisdictions, has prepared a Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program. To implement the program, the voters of Washington County will need to approve $62.3 million dollars in financing. The County is asking each local jurisdiction to review the MSTIP and pass a resolution in support of the program and recommend either a serial levy or a bond to raise the funds for implementation. Attached are resolutions which would recommend the bond or the 10 year serial levy. In addition, information explaining the program is also attached. - ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Review the attached information and adopt the resolution recommending either the serial levy or the bond. SUGGESTED ACTION Review the attached information and adopt the resolution recommending the serial levy or the bond with the additional language as recommended in staff's memo. (EAN:bs/1736P) .t WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING — 150 N. FIRST AVENUE HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 DEPT.OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION Land Development Services Division 2nd Floor 1503►648-8761 August 9, 1985 To Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee From Richard A. Daniels Director" Re MSTIP-BALLOT TITLE AUTHORIZATION DEADLINE FOR BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERACTION According to preliminary County Counsel opinion, the Board of County-Commissioners must authorize a ballot title by October 2, 1985 for the November 5, 1985 election. Action at the Board of County Commissioners' meeting on October 1 , 1985, will meet this requirement. Additionally, if the Board of County Commissioners wishes to utilize a general obligation bond authorization, notices must be given two weeks prior on September 17 and 24, 1985. The Board of County Commissioners should authorize the notice on September 10, 1985. JD c: Alan Bachman Frank Angelo Bruce Warner Bob Davis an equal opportunity employer, .. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council August 14, 1985 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development fid SUBJECT: MSTIP Discussion Washington County has worked with the local jurisdictions in the County to prepare a Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program (MSTIP). Councilor Tom Brian has acted as Tigard's Policy Representative while Frank Currie represented the City at the technical level. Based on the Committee input, a program providing for $62.3 million in project improvements has been prepared for approval by the voters in November, 1985. The County is asking that each local jurisdiction review the MSTIP and pass a resolution in support of the program. The Council should also determine if a ten-year serial levy or bond measure is the proper means of raising the funds necessary to complete all oftheidentified projects. A resolution suggested by the County is attached for either option. Information explaining the program proposed by Washington County is attached for your review. A vote should be taken to adopt the resolution of your choice. If you choose a bond you should add language which says "however, if the majority of the cities of Washington County favor a levy, Tigard supports a bond" and vice versa if the Council supports a bond. In this way the County will have a consensus and be able to proceed, The Tigard Transportation Committee reviewed the MSTIP at its' last meeting and will be present to give a recommendation. WAM:lw/1731P CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 85- 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL SUPPORTING THE WASHINGTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE'S MAJOR STREETS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (MSTIP) AND RECOMMENDING SUBMITTAL TO THE VOTERS. WHEREAS, WashingtonCounty has existing deficiencies in its major streets transportation system which create congestion and traffic safety problems; and WHEREAS, said transportation deficiencies adversely affect our quality of life and inhibit economic development in Washington County; and WHEREAS, the Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee, consisting of City. County and State officials, have identified priority projects aimed at addressing the most; serious existing transportation deficiencies; and WHEREAS, the Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee has recommended a Major Street Transportation Improvement Program, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, said Program is designed to benefit all of Washington County; and WHEREAS, said Program should be endorsed by this City and recommended `hat the Washington County Board of Commissioners place before the voters a ten-year serial levy as soon as feasible to implement the Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: The City of Tigard, Oregon recommends that the Washington County Board of Commissioners place before the voters a ten-year serial levy as soon as feasible to implement the Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program. PASSED: This day of 1985. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST i Deputy City Recorder City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 85- lw/1781P WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING- 150 N. FIRST AVENUE • HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 DEPT.OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION Land Development Services Division 2nd Floor (503)648-8761 August 9, 1985 To : Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee Technical Group From : Richard A. Daniel r- erector Re : SUMMARY COMPARISON OF 10 YEAR LEVY AND BOND Attached to this memo is a table which provides a comparison of the two methods of financing ,the MSTIP we have discussed over the past -few months. Previous information distributed to .the WCTCC over-estimated the tax rates associated with the bond example. Rebecca Marshall of Shearson Lehman Brothers has analyzed both methods of financing and her findings are presented in a letter available at today's meeting. The attached memo summarizes her findings. RAD/FA/JD Attachment an` equal opportunity employer S- C)o c CD C)cryo •� E E- o .7411 ' -.5 C3 >>•r M to r O N Ln r .. (1)+a9 co zr C cco cm O +w co ZO --4- O '-4A i U W r V1 O " t-r Lal ��N�A L Q N td^ aJ 11 r +3.Ct aJ +4 . 4-3 U -0 V7 Z tOi O O -0 >I r R- a) i (L) L O C p .1 O C) C 4A, L 4-3 tts•rj to r O m C) m CD L17 .M-CD 1�13o L Z co J W f� O () O a) .. 3.4 c1 a to a) L a a) VIOW M 41 4-1 O — 0— OY W a)d•M -.Ch- r (a a) C LO 4- N +•I�- r!R — L C— C N a) a) to O to If It b04 0 O 3 L O M Q t.0 SO r r VI N Cl W td E r a) • C 2] C G N C L7 r-c 11 to-0 d O C7 r O t0 O t0 U O C O O >1 EL m tO A r-r a)W L r t0•r •r to L N r •r•n Q 1t1 Ofd r0 t0 U L (U C cL a) w'O m O OG w aJ tU i. CU a) C•r Y > O V1 > iw > L W CA O Y Y t6 CO a.O.t v Q N r tO N W CL. Ln t9 Z� Q O Y O LL):n.. J M _ -j w O N . lko C)LLI r Z W W a../r O 03 L L bR 41 C > Y JCL 4- VI C O oit 4J 90 U ro LU W— W LL.CDO J O A.01-4-1U r G.' L In O 0 QW L C) N t6 tC CO r M 4-i O A d r VI a-t W C to C O O r v C N CO. Q M C 'a O U O CD O O N � CP it Q 00 t Ln w S- CD O O L C Co O O U -4-2 41 V w p t0 11 •r r OI In n UCD CD d O O a r O ra a) O m O ro W O L L a) > Oto i (1) ao Wr v C7>-Q co E�)Q >3 a yr eA Y O 4f} O O N O O C) r 4J O : a 41 U Cl a) U O r +' to 4J'0 L 4tr u S- v C o 4J to O to O b r N to . o a o o W (aC O o � °. dE'z U-u F- 1—v t..) a - &1J�C17�3�1��{7AO�1Ta 3�.��.�i�119,�1tit�^�l��l� t. B�O'X<�3 ta11L:� S Mr. Brent Curtis Planning Manager Washington County 150 N First Ave Hillsboro, OR 97124 August 4, 1985 RE: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS - MAJOR STREETS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Dear Brent: I, am attaching my tables comprising the financial analysis requested by the;'county "regarding the street program I have used the information you provided (attached) and have compared my tables to the tables prepared by Mr. Kevin .Martin in the July 31, 1985 memo. Rick Daniels and yourself requested two bond issue and two serial l levy calculations. A summary of these financings presents the following: TYPE SIZE TOTAL COST 1986/87 TAX RATE Serial Levy - 3 yr $23,900,000/yr $71,700,000 $2.61 Serial Levy - 10 yr 8,800,000/yr 88,000,000 0.96 Bond Issue - 20 yr 79,570,000 180,409,398 0.76 Maximum tax rate 0.97 Bond Issue - 10 yr 79,570,000 120,261,625 0.99 Maximum tax rate 1.19 I used the following assumptions: ON THE BONDS _ 1 Federal arbitrage laws restrict the "temporary period" in which bond proceeds can be invested at an unlimited rate to three years. Therefore, two bond issues will be needed for the five year construction period. The issues were divided t. by Mr. Frank Angelo into $36,885,000 for the first three years and $25,490,000 for the last two (1985 dollars.) Foster a Marshall 03visian Shearson Letxnan Brat m Inc. Koin Center,222 S.W.Columbia St,Suite 1500 - Portland,OR.97201 An American Express company -6901_ 503.243r Page Two 2. The inflation rate suggested by yourself was 8% annually. I assumed that the expenditures were evenly divided between the periods (one third in the first issue; one half in the second.) I then increased the needed amount by 8% each year. Issue costs were 'also "increased 8% annually ,to produce two issues of $40,805,000 and $38,765,000 for total bonds of $79 ,570,000. It is important that the voter approved amount, the "bond authorization be large enough to handle,a reasonable amount of inflation. If it does not appear necessary to issue the full second issue of $38,765,000, then it is not necessary to do so: a smaller issue can be sold. The only way to increase the issue size is another election so the initial authorization should be amply sized. I assumed the same draw-down as for 3. In calculating earnings, the inflation calculation. (see above) 4. I did not include ANY earnings on proceeds in my issue sizing but instead showed the earnings as an offset to the debt levy. The President's tax reform plan would eliminate any earnings on proceeds. Therefore, to be safe, it is best not to include the earnings in the authorized amount needed to cover the five years. -If the plan does not pass, a smaller second issue can be :sold or the earnings can offset the debt levy. r � . 5. I set interest rates on both bond issues at roughly two percent higher than current rates. This is quite conservative and places the issues at the middle of the last interest rate swing. CURRENT RATES RATES USED Bond Issue - 10 yr. 8.10% 9.91% & 10.08$ Bond Issue - 20 yr 9 .00 10.90% & 11.00% 6 I "levelized" the tax rate in two cases, meaning that I made the debt service on the combined two bond issues fairly equal X over the life of the issues. This can be further refined { according to the instructions of the County. It seemed likely that the County would want a reasonably equal tax rate over time but would not want to count on earnings for the reasons given above. 7. Issuance costs were estimated very conservatively (high) . It is likely that the total costs would be less, but this is a small component of the issue size and planning should assume maximum costs. Page Three 8. I used a delinquency rate of 10% annually. On the bonds I assumed no recovery of these delinquent taxes for three . years. This is very conservative but is generally used when estimating tax rates since the estimates contain many assumptions affecting the rates. 9. I used the 1985-86 Assessed Valuation as recommended in your letter of August 2, '1985 of $9 ,156,255,642. This was increased by 2% annually thereafter. 10. I included a 2% discount in the issue sizing. It lowers the interest rate to offer a<discount to the underwriters and also allows better cash flow calculations and tax rate levelizing. ON THE SERIAL LEVY My calculations are very similar to those of Kevin Martin. The only differences were: 1. I assumed that there would be earnings for half the current year on the surplus as well as full year earnings on the prior year balance. (, 2. I assumed that delinquent taxes would be recaptured half in the second year and three quarters in the third year. By the fourth year the prior year taxes should replace the current year delinquencies. I hope this analysis suffices for the presentations you are planning. I would be happy to refine or explain any of the tables if you so need. Please call me with any questions. Sincerely, ebecca Marshall Vice President y A v 6.11 119 Y'1 a• C M P P P �fn 1 SL 117^N1 M 1 N 1 wr i 1 1 �1A�.O� • d� � � � p O 1'1D•1 Y'I • IFl l N N Yl O •egI 1 3 A i x 1 _ O 61 mm p Y N 6 .2 .2 tl Y Y•� ^•>.P fT Y •� y • y 1 W _ C S Y'1 • • M � 'J.�fat W 0• t y xW a Nr.P h NO Y w O P tr! P W m m m m m i W w M � � r r .�M h A P �^n 4Y IN► P m P P P p O.cr w i t I!r O P h d t 1Pi Pf a W O w h H A T ti N P .e N �A 11'1 y►�N A Y"1 h N T Y tr f{Vf _ 111. _yy mm pq S Q � 1 w w®it m 1:it O or m 1 1 1 gg q 1 IrJ!�✓ Yl 1/NWyr�N m m b W O O 1 SO) w Y O Y 1 11'f A As i T 1 pp M w SS pppp pppp ppp ; pp H !_ m m it m m 090;m im 1 aIx ti i Gi NI'� NmT m a_ri _ i Y � � r M Y�' r 1 p ® �W m�P P N o-T a •. r r w r q BHN— �. m o- :o m W ^.� MOOO OOO O.00p 0000000 OO OOOO m H •v ra @'ran � m -0 1� =ti Ijy O C a m 0 1[f 0 0 0 m 11x9 m ti w Y'1 N Y7 m ir• � Y H H ." PO O 1y P d O YN•!r�Y'f M9 K -IIY P M P ti m M @_PPP .. �O�OeO w.- NNN N.HHH Hr1. W Hr'J'r. ~ ON WohHQ _s^Ptd®- SHY Thr HTI V e 6 1 O 3. OH.� b ��O NM1 R�H �.�l� Pi7WO -0 -AT ; I�r V y P P P m@ m@®m m®®m@ W m W01@® Z wo- NI mlr-0aewo- H .: ..fir: Wt i 11pp�1 p yey ppp Yp'1 1 41 O ss rp ap�y pp pop ; fn _ O N Y9 Ir1�11'1 m N h IA 111 N Y1 A= -O w O r� 1/'1 1 N M m� oeaPml'++ IINi�H r.® $ o� r ~ oma i ►. w lam �o�v�Se� YQ�1� 6d +� $$ $ Soo�S3SS2G33ob � CL 8 Y�+Swa� ra..ryC i is i " MM m O.� W .~O►.®P P?N H -0 ... _ 1 1'.O•N.Y 1► L. Y1 _• _� ; � YY m r 6 rr P �r a N 4 S tl h 1 aYel �� _ w Ye1A{oao .e..ppee�pp ev1r+ 8� � i H_ A M H H h N 119 L'1 -0 h 11'1 Y91 Yl 0 m m@ H Il IA H H H yH h r0 h M r9 M h�!Vf H � J y P N O 0 a S ^�S�S O O M `O ® O H •1 yY�9 � r = O_O � rH N.N- @ V b?_ Me 'Nti^A �PHN =ralwmd I d ]I SS{��� •' > S Y_ y P Yry YH = P -0 N m@ A.HO Y'1 r H M^P W a N P -0 H t P ® L ^ C W Y± 1 Q v � N N !V iiI it►�M T1�O�O O G d a o�p O A p N� Y�yf1 Tppt M MO M 9. 8.2 - �p tOM "a w �4+ qq gq $ y� aWwn m ' 3d 3 Sa�S3�Ao $ O� 38o SIt elo = �e ct t H 1 + r N 1 GJ V a I r1 N L 1 4. 2 y6 V m m C1 e Crm ' >• •Yi O P O^m O O O P P P Y'i•f rr O O O O G O O • A Y O ��^� hM1Y O_a `NGW OYH9OG O_W Y7m H A M .; A W w Yl 1"1. o nnH _. aocv•'� -aoY�a_ -o ie r•+ vaP v .r w � � N e• wH O n m O H w w r w w w w w w w N fr H w w H _ w N �� O a•r A 0 ^ � O 'sa 0 0=O O O.G L C 0 •O Y 9 m w • w w w w w w w w_w i N O yy s. > O O � • �eP•. r pea• .Ni h w0.O 11'1 O O O C O C ' 1 O. w v y w w w w w w w s ww to w w w ~ O m M YA•N_HV �_Mf 1 P d 6 H w y .w• -- - - - - - -- - M w O w 0 -^--M M.M•, 1 e �_W W A W P W Y O 1 + M r w w w t w O a W W rT H f •O.. N p� � 1 d pw � PO O H N N Ps N H N N N s= 1 N w r cr1 O p O O O O O w A A oz P A App H i 11'1�4 M 1 A 1 O eOboe000p000000000 1. O Ic; ^ w 1 1q� 1y/�s Op pp 8 gyp+ p p •pp 1 •H•1 P P 0 0. 0 0 •y �O.Op O O�p Qep 0 O e p O O O O O � O + 1 •Y 1 � y y Y ti O O O M M'I M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O y •w A 0 0 •' 1 Y= n+vsm wm�: w womo.a i m � ~ 1:rN ¢Nvm moM• PwoN w j � �wo,• A .+b .�w.�.'35aSS S b ooeMalb'oyM.4+ a�0000000000. O � �M s• f �P a e'W �N _ W 1� 'P W fr ^ w• p W O � 1 •10 .N.. V f O h ti� YM1 h N^w w ^ ; ^ ryrc ¢ titvSS•... N r 2e3oSoS oS000maepOp4 v O� p g R - Pp ~ d P O w IO•. P i^ W 1 M i m Y r 1 ut L s Mr > S IN?. « M > 6 ^ ^^ P ^ ^ ^^ —— — � �w N N Cr N tYa za �•�*"` C O Y y Y tYa �p Y m ^ 6 6 aL 14 b r N win o: S a r8' S.�. S : iY r fY +O O O.► w w •.O O O O O O O O O O 6 O m r n IF+1 1M� 1!f Irl O N fM1 N®e O L; F b .p m O_Yl'O O'O m Y9 m H ►7 m ^P N = Q P a r P.z m N • O_ w OD - . P P^»0 0 »-Z.rte.��.Ni N w.N' O O O O O O e 1 ^ ^ d �1 Yl� r h M w�r r • H 4 t O N N M W r O N N>A r w 1 ^ r w r w G ` 41 _ 0 N_YB m P O h r w O.e O O O 4D w N N W rA h � 000w.-�rsAo eoee ®eoo-000 • v+ p pp I s NNgt N ^ P P w N P g®►1 O r ; O P ^ M1�mm V1 p N cm O N1 YQj Y7 m O O P m m b 0 P W w ; N UA Y'Im Oro.q »rA1.A. mAmS $ ®O.00p Doo Z ». »O P P•► O M M P O 1 O Yor W;Iff WS it r+ o M1 i P P � •b H P Y7 1 v, cz W W p s 1 0 0 Mw 'o I WT 2^$ =ro $ ewHe o w o S a t w F � ^ yi?j r N►f 1q M�Fe Y' !�1�Y9 I •11 G A 1 L`bi w O s a •moi Yyy'��f yVy i 9f rOi» O�v» O O O@ e O O p P r m p Vf m ff�jVj� t YS Y7 1f'1 'O J Y7 M Y7 11'f P ,1, M J G =H S O O A O A 0 0 0 0 1 pp •�m.p� Y h N N N O y w W Y7 m � OQ I H N N N•'r 1 N y 09 1 >YmT W r !+ sOOa Nyy M M M O Np r aV M N pMp M N D O NO ►p� M M N H 1 C r r �pe y1aII M S O w� S N Y7 A ? N S p O p 0 0 0 0 G S S P =O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 y� e o 0 0 0 0@ o = o $ G ^ 1 • N 4 I r r A C 9 V v W Y Oq r w P. h rs m P O N rI r M9 tr P » a p N O P 11'9 rM m•b 0 —m P P P P _? _ _ N pN�N M1I p"• r Y r � .P•�P— r�..�..P.�P r r M ul 1 �p m M1 1 t O 1 1 N e0 M1 4 O A e b � N N / 1 h 1 O 1 at 1 O N 1 1 a I a I 1 o- � aooea $ oeoo o O p M1 O O N O O ENC a H N N P � N W W J IJ 1 Y y 0 L C � 61 W f..l W N Y Y C Y O y f i J 9 W Y w r 01 yl sL L Y N 6 9 ►. V � C IJ � Y C r Q P.1 ` _ S W L J Y V J C Y y WW N Y v O - N c y litY WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING — 150 N. FIRST AVENUE HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DEPT.OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION WES MYLLENBECK,Chairman Planning Division BONNIE L. HAYS.Vice Chairman 2nd Floor EVA M_ KILLPACK (503)648.8761 JOHN E. MEEK LUCILLE WARREN August 2, 1985 Rebecca Marshall , Vice President Shearson Lehman Brothers 222 SW Columbia Portland, OR 97201 Dear .Rebecca: Thanks for meeting with Frank and. I yesterday regarding a financial analysis of the Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program. As a result of that meeting you requested that we clarify the following points; 1) For the staff analysis of a bond option, what costs are being inflating' by 8% per year, and why? 2) For the staff analysis of the serial levy option, what items or what rational is used in calculating interest (column 7)? 3) What total assessed value should be utilized for FY 1985-86? 4) What rate of inflation should be utilized in determining year 2 - 10 construction project costs? 5) Assuming 2 bond sales, one in year 1 and one in year 4, what amount of bond proceeds would be required for the second bond sale? Answers 1) Bond Analysis - 8% inflation factors For the Bond Analysis we assumed that the construction would occur over a five year time period (pay back over ten years). Bonds would be sold in year one. We assumed that 1/5 or 20% of the projects would be constructed each year. Therefore we took the current present value, divided by five, and successively inflated years 2, 3, 4 and 5 by 8% annually to de- termine the aggregate amount of funds required as proceeds from the initial bond sale. The 8% inflation rate in construction costs re- flects increased costs of construction for building an equal dollar amount of projects in each of the five years. an equalopportunity employer August 2, 1985 Rebecca Marshall , Vice President Shearson Lehman Brothers Page 2 2) Serial Levy Analysis Interest Short answer: This analysis assumes construction over 10 years. There- fore the levy proceeds analysis must include construction cost inflation for years 2 - 10 to determine total levy required. The amount collected equals 1/10 of_total levy. One-tenth of total levy exceeds, in early years, one-tenth of the present value (or early year inflated) con- struction costs. The difference between the 1/10 of total levy and the actual construc- tion costs are invested and contribute to the year-end balance for each year. In later years, actual construction costs exceed one-tenth of the total levy. In such cases reserves are utilized to cover actual construction costs. Detailed answer: See Attachment A 3) Total Assessed Value Use $9,156,225,640. FY 1984-85 total taxable value is $8,773,513,800 (96% of current true cash value, $9,156,255,642). Next year total assessed value will equal true cash value. The Department of Assessment andTaxation has not released an FY 1985-86 equalized total true cash value. They advise us to use FY 1984-85 total true cash value ($9,156,255,642). See Attachment B 4) Rate of inflation for construction costs George Shelley has advised we use 8% as an inflation factor. Although there is some reason to believe 6.5% may be a more accurate assumption for construct cost inflation, 8% will yield a more conservative analysis. Use 8% as assumption for inflation. 5) Two Bond Sales - Proceeds - Assume the first bond sale must provide $36,885,000 for project con- struction in years 1 - 3. Assume the second bond sale must provide $25,490,000 for project con- struction in years 4-5. Please note, these amounts are 1985 cost estimates and have not been inflated to account for construction in years 2 - 5. See Attachment C for greater project detail . We're clearly interested in accounting for inflation to project con- struction costs for years 2+. Can it be assumed for years 2 and 3 under the first bond sale, that unused proceeds will be invested and the rate of return on such investments will exceed inflation? Should the 1985 construction costs for the second bond sale be inflated at the outset to determine the amount of the second bond sale? Rebecca Marshall, Vice President Shearson Lehman Brothers Page s I'look forward to your responses. Should you require additional information or clarification, please contact me immediately. Si ly, nt Curtis lanning Manager BC:db Attachments ATTACHMENT A ( Serial Levy Since state law allows only,a fixed amount levy to run for ten years, it is assumed that only 10 percent of the total, projects can be built each year. Column 1 assumes 10percent of total project value is expended each year for ten years ($6,237,500). This amount is then inflated each year for years 2-10 by 8 percent, giving,the amount that needs to be spent each year. It is assumed that $88,000,000 dollars or $8,800,000 levied each year for ten years is required to finance the total road project value ($62,375,000). The procedure in the table is used to test this assumption as follows: Step 1 : $8,800,000 is collected in year 1 (and all subsequent years as shown in Column 1). Step 2: 10 percent of the $8,800,000 is delinquent and not collected each year (Column 2). Step 3: Subtracting Column 3 from Column 2 yeilds the actual amount collected each year (Column 4). Step 4: Since only 10 percent of the total project value ($62,375,000) can be constructed each year, a surplus results (Column 5 Column 4 - Column 1). Step 5: Column 5 then becomes the ending balance for year 1 (Column 9). Step 6: The ending balance (Column 9) is then invested for one year and draws interest. The earned interest for year 1 is recorded in Column 7 in the year 2 row Example: $1 ,682,500 X 1 .08 = 134,600). For subsequent years the steps are the same except that it will be assumed that 90 percent of the previous years delinquent taxes will also be collected (880,000 X .90 = 792,000). This appears in Column 6. The steps for year 2 and beyond are: (Column 4 - Column 3. - Column 1 = Column 5) + Column 6 + Column 7+ previous year Column 9 = current year Column 9 Beginning in year 5 the amount (Column 5) collected will be less than the amount needed (Column 1). By investing the surplus collected in years 1-4 a reserve is built up to cover the inflated costs that result during the ten year construction period. If all the money collected each year were expended the same year, no carry-over surplus would result. However, the effects of doing this are not clear. More projects would be completed in the earlier years of the program meaning the projects would be constructed sooner and less inflation would result. This may or may not affect the current levy rate estimated at .96/$1000 AV. ATTACHMENT B SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT AND TAX ROLL WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 1984-85 ....................:....... ............... $7,938,857,000 Taxable Value on Real 468 010,100 Taxable Value on Personal Property 77,884,000 Taxable Value on Mobile Homes ........................ ...... . ........ ..........•..... ..........:..................... 288,762,700 Taxable Value on Utilities ..:••• $8,773,513,800 TOTAL TAXABLEVALUEON TAX ROLL ........... Total Taxes Extended on Roll: .......... $182,549,517.87 Real ........ ..... • 10,470,355.44 Personal Property .....:....... Mobi.e Homes .................. 1,613,969.48 Public Utility ................ 6,278,742.32 l TOTAL TAX .................. $200,912,585.11 $8,285,211,400 Total True Cash Value - Real ...........:........ 487,483,960 Personal Property ............................... ............ ................. 82,767,000 Mobile Homes ..........:....... 300,793,282 Public Utility .............. TOTAL TRUE CASH VALUE ........................................... $9,156,255,642 ASSESSMENT RATIOS OOPR NON-4OPR 1980-81 84.2 87.6 1981-82 81.6 84.4 1982-83 83.8 85.1 1983-84 90.3 90.9 1984-85 96.0 96.0 t -4- ` ATTACHMENT C WASHINGTON COUNTY Inter—Department Correspondence Date August 2, 1985 To Brent Curtis, Planning Manager From : Frank Angelo, Senior Planner a/tffiv-/g2' Subject . ESTIMATED PROJECT SCHEDULE WITH 10 YEAR BOND As requested by Rebecca Marshall, I have estimated which MSTIP projects could be committed to construction within the first 3 years and which projects would be post 3 years.- The attached sheets show the projects which are assumed to be under construction within the first 3 years and past 3 years. All costs are in 1985 dollars. FA:mb Attachments I. PROJECTS WHICH COULD BE UNDER CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE FIRST THREE YEARS PROJECT MSTIP AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT #3: 4th Avenue $ 41 ,000 $ 91 ,000 #4: 12th Avenue $ 81000 $ 17,000 #5: N. 14th Avenue $ 41,000 $ 87,000 #7 Rural Improvement $1$ 00,000 ` $1 ,500,000 Program (50X) #8: HBR $ 250,000 $2,500,000 #1028th Avenue $ 800,000 $ 800,000 #11• T.Y. Highway $2,050,000 $3,850,000 #12 Cornell #t $2,800,000 $2,800,000 #13: Cornell #2 $1,900,000 $1 ,900,000 #15: 185th Avenue $6,550,000 $16,150,000 #17: Murray Blvd $ 900,000 $6,100,000 #20: Cedar Hills/Walker $ 300,000 $ 300,000 #22; Lombard $1,100,000 $1 ,100,000 #23: Hall Blvd $1,500,000 $2,400,000 #25: Scholls Ferry $1 ,770,000 $3,770,000 #27: Hall Bike $ 500,000 $ 500,000 #28: Bull Mt./99W $ 380,000 $ 500,000 #29: Durham Road $3,700,000 $3,700,000 #30: Lower Boones Ferry $1 ,265,000 $1 ,265,000 #31 : Tualatin/Sherwood Road $6,230,000 $6,230,000 #34: Western Bypass Study $ 300,000 $ 300,000 #35: MSTIP Reserve (50X) $3,000,000 $3,000,000 T 0 T A L S $36,885,000 $58,860,000 II. PROJECTS WHICH WILL BE POST - 3 YEARS PROJECT MSTIP AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT #1c Maple Street $ 650,000 $1 ,300,000 #2: 24th Avenue $ 850,000 $1,750,000 #6: N. 19th Avenue $ 340,000 $ 340,000 #7: Rural Improvement $1 ,500,000 $1 ,500,000 Program (50%) #9: East Main $3,500,000 $3,500,000 - #14: Cornell #3 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 #16: Murray.(N) $; 500,000 $ 500,000 #18: Murray/BNRR $2,100,000 $2,100,000 #19: Farmington Road $4,400,000 $8,800,000 #21: Beaverton Uptown $ 300,000 $ 300,000 #24: Hart/Bany $2,000,000 $2,000,000 #26: Greenburg Road $ 250,000 $ 250,000 #32: Edy Road $2,300,000 $2,300,000 #33: Oregon Street $ 600,000 $ 600,000 #34: MSTIP Reserve (50%) $3,000,000 $3,000,000 T 0 T A L $25,490,000 $31 ,440,000 r CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 85- A JOINT RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF BEAVERTON AND THE CITY OF T'IGARD DECLARING AND SUPPORTING MUTUAL ANNEXATION PLANNING AREAS OF AGREEMENT (APAA) WHEREAS, the cities of Beaverton and Tigard find that municipal urban services can be provided most efficiently and equitably by cities; WHEREAS, conflicting land us%� plans and overlapping areas of planning interest tend-to` delay the ultimate annexation to cities and tend towards illogical and inefficient services boundaric>.s; WHEREAS, both cities respect the rights and preferences of property owners and residents to decide when to annex to a city according to State Law; and WHEREAS, both cities see competition and conflict between cities over individual annexation , proposals as contrary to their mutual long-range communityinterests and wish to avoid such conflicts whenever possible by a clear statement of interest mutually adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: 1. A joint Annexation Planning Area Agreement (APAA) hereby exists between the two cities; 2. The South Beaverton-North Tigard boundary on future annexation areas of interest as shown on the Map (Attachment A) shall: begin East at the Multnomah-Washington County line; Westerly follow Taylors Ferry Road and a line across the Oleson Road; Westerly along Hall Boulevard to the Hall-Scholls Ferry Road intersection; from the Hall-Scholls Ferry _intersection a mutual study area exists for the Washington Square area bounded by Scholls Ferry, Highway 217, Greenburg Road to Hall Blvd. and back to the Hall-Scholls Ferry Intersection; from there Southwest along Scholls Ferry Road to the Old Scholls Ferry-New Scholls Ferry Road intersection; continuing Southwest along Old Scholls Ferry Road to Murray Road; from the Murray Road intersection and future Murray Road connection into Tigard continuing South to New Scholls Ferry Road; and from there Westerly along Scholls Ferry Road to the Urban Growth Boundary; 3. The cities declare and support Beaverton's annexation interests North and West of this APAA Boundary and Tigard's annexation interests South and Eastofthe APAA Boundary; A. The cities mutually agree that upon request from the other that they will support annexation proposals to the other consistent with the APAA Boundary. The cities mutually , agree that they will not approve annexations to their city contrary to the APAA without a resolution from the other" city, supporting such an annexation and specifically modifying any departure from the APAA Boundary; RESOLUTION NO. 85- Page 1 r 5. The cities further resolve to generally support annexations by the other away from the APAA Boundary areas and to further develop a joint annexation policy statement inthis regard; 6. The cities agree to revise and amend other planning agreements consistent with this APAA resolution. PASSED: This day of 1985. Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST Deputy City Recorder —`City of Tigard (BJ:bs/O936p) 4 x x �v RESOLUTION NO. 85— Page 2 ��' t••y :1� !+ •�{ r+"'�/{� - it •"'y._.. ♦.• + i 1. 4 _.�• r � 11_1. .:'• � •�� 7` .. I .— •\. f ell AL JL �' t Yui. _ ;' -• �� i _ • � { Vii• - :�� i � t p oe m a > < f w cr i,, ac O u < is - ._ ' _..a. .�:`�.". _.... - - —- � � � �\�• • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September- 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM ##: DATE SUBMITTED: August 26, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Cade Revisions Planning Commission &Park Board PREPARED BY: Lareen Wilson Rules REQUESTED BY: Loreen Wilson DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE These suggested revisions are consistent with Council efforts in Boardmanship. INFORMATION SUMMARY During the Boardmanship Workshops in early spring, the Planning Commission quorum requirements were found to be diffucult to interrpret. After f discussion with Legal Counsel and the Planning Commission, it was suggested to change the language to make the voting requirements clearer. At the same time, the Park Board meeting notice requirements were also found to be extreme. When notice is given for a meeting, the members also receive notice. The Park Board agreed that notice requirements for members could be deleted from Section 2.12.020 so that the Boardmanship Manual, which is based on the Public Meeting Law, would set the standard city--wide for notice. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached ordinances. 2. Take no action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the two ordinances attached. lw/3100A i .� .o.pC�e., y oD� .O p .,'S •3 ,spi p000 V:.iA ! as 46 In as CA ca 0 vow � op � a,Mmo� � Fo,�g�''��� Q,�.., 8 -N•"-,���'s. ifd' a o�+ e� as - c Q,,,, g• ,,, fv ,.gam 's +�� �,�� a�r5 ;3 sit 2 ,0 CA $ p•t7 e. ai w Y cd p p i, .� o9Ja Jq CU ai aliok s a , a 5 .o- _ 93 SH So o ,,'� d 4 $ r p at o v z p,p� w m � o cd dgg I as-s8a.� t3a �.' w3 Wap.E—tn 3 v f f r d Oa of p IA e4 d V 841 JA at O fi33•• d! BOBcr sod aw $ o o f,, �v aha, �+'i3 "0.3 'rp .o'- CO { pcatterAs Mal y pCC. s. Ra. •54 p v AM i3� a.i • f Pt�i Q•.�••� " °7 s � - 06-1 Sup.. .rqq ght .. z'SOU ort r - rove }: HiWWRO."i�V�corm. It a measure w raise< million ty's toptraasportatiaa official.Richard . was qWov;4Dat t*sem.the coun- A.Damieia.is speadlag much of;this _ ty coin u aity WAR sddiu"41 4. month seaking rapport trans cities asci million in:tnatcbind tunde'trorn the,., other.,comsstustlty ;coups fora U.S. Department of Trasssp�artation,•., November ballot measure,to raise br 8 thetotai to M moon. -about$63 million for major street and- As proposed,a 10-year capital-1 -fanspart&OM improvemenU in the Improvements saw IM would permit c ntY• completion of 35 major project to Dante asksd,sad received authad- widen and otherwise Improve major. ; mttaa fromcountycomminionere to streets and thotoushtares.witbla the-, meet withAvlamwtativea of ati Cities county. K. Within the county,as well as with spe- -Danials olid a serial levy to taadc dal interest upa and-.communitY the work would resultin,a tax rate to%., planalaS orgaaixatioesx-Dauiels is ow ars of.about.98 cmata:pe&_; director Of#ise'oounEty's Department of l,000 oi: valuation is 1885. Laud Use and TraaepOrt Oml to epproilmateiy► so Oeuul, =DsnIeW dri"Ac i -aupwt ter pes� l08l:> -a bond or sc:taa levy.fatbwM 1ta sad that if d id-:Z spproval..of,the:=tottntya propooed ad rsot to'.pressat a manure to the "?dgjor Street Tra tatlon improve. vows m Nov=ber;dwyVWy would mauts ProRram't,bY the WwWngtoa iconsider l? f s N £ CAunty.T Coordinating` thebalbt# other .X qq .! st committee is waft up `Daatads mad that while tte county O the` at tha,dtlaa;tba chair•, was ably.to,dbsfer�ate bdormstion .y, €°utast q f`'the c iM1Y bond M eammW asboost roed`isaadlnS aoeds►it could manei�s and aie resentativa of due 9 +M ate�a Melton A-Dluritd. mi • � hCG Mf I- •� " desfrad support, than hav�to.dedde.os he dmin1; aatoustt ausd fype of tc bp,I p�ag�ior the tried" p�; rstm� e card that`lfitlreY �` RME CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 26, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 5, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: none ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Larry Scoville TU 5a-85 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Ann Newton REQUESTED BY: Larry Scoville DEPARTMENT HEAD OK CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Mr. Larry Scoville has filed an application for a Temporary Use Permit for one year to operate a car sales lot at 12885 SW Pacific Hwy. Concurrently, Mr. Scoville applied for approval for two months from the Planning Director. The Director approved the request for a two-month, period from August Vii. 1985 to October 5, 1985. A copy of the Director's approval is attached. Also attached is a memo from the Planning Staff outlining the Temporary Use approval criteria and copies of the information submitted by the applicant. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Review the standards for approval of Temporary Use permits and approve the applicant's request. 2. Review the standards for approval of Temporary Use permits and deny the applicant's request. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the applicant's request for a Temporary Use Permit for one year with } conditions as outlined by staff. ?. (EAN:pm/1696P) _ MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council August 6, 1985 FROM: Planning Staff . SUBJECT: Larry Scoville -TU 5a--85 Mr. Larry Scoville has requested a Temporary Use Permit for one year to allow car sales on a temporary basis in a General Commercial zone. The property is located at 12885 SW Pacific Hwy. According to the information submitted by the applicant, approximately 4 to 8 vehicles (all 1980 and newer) will be displayed on the site. The only signs on the site will be an the individual vehicles. There will be no attendant on the property. Under the provisions of Chapter 18.140, the Council may approve a Temporary Use permit subject to the following: (1) Approval of the request shall be for a period not to exceed one year from the date of final approval; (2) The Council makes findings that all of the applicable approval criteria have been satisfied or can be satisfied through conditions of approval; (3) Notice shall be given as provided by 18.32.130; and (4) The approval may be subject to one renewal. The applicant is requesting approval for one year. Notice was given as provided by Section 18.32.130. The applicable approval criteria is as follows: (1) Approval or approval with conditions shall be based on findings that all of the following criteria are satisfied: (A) The temporary use is limited in duration by the purposes for which the permit is sought, such as parade stands, circus, fairs, or other exhibitions, sales of goods, wares, merchandise, produce, or Christmas trees, and other similar temporary needs; (B) There exists adequate and safe ingress and egress when combined with the other uses of the property as required by 18.108 Access and 18.102 Clear Vision. (C) There exist.°; adequate parking for the customers of the temporary use as required by 18.106 Off-Street Parking. f (D) The use will pose no hazard to pedestrians in the area of the use; and C, (E) The use will not create adverse offsite impacts including noise, odor's, vibrations, glare or lights which will affect the adjoining uses in the manner which other uses allowed outright in the zone would not affect the adjoining uses. The Temporary Use will be limited to one year and will involve the exhibition and sale of merchandise, There will be no access to the site from Pacific Highway. Access to the site will be from the adjoining Chevron Station property. In addition, the management of the Chevron Station has ' granted permission for customers of the car lot to park in designated spaces on the <Chevron lot. The applicant's use as proposed does not pose any hazards to pedestrians. The use will not create adverse offsite impacts including noise, odor's, vibrations or lights. If the City Council approves the applicant's request, staff requests that the following conditions be attached to the approval: (1) The permit shall be valid until August,W, 1986. - (2) The ;applicant shall obtain a City of Tigard Business Tax. (3) All areas to be used for parking of display vehicles shall be gravel. (4) Any signs used to ,indicate parking and no parking areas or to indicate the identification and location of the business stall be approved through the Building Department. (EAN:pm/1696P) x� CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION TEMPORARY USE TU 5b-85 APPLICATION: A request by Larry Scoville for approval of a temporary use to allow operation of a used car sales lot from August 5, 1985, to October 5, 1985,_ at 12885 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard (Washington County Tax Map 2S1 28D Tax Lot 2000). The property is zoned C—G.' DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background No other applications have been processed on this property. 2. Vicinity Information General retail commercial uses abut the property on the north, west, east, and across Pacific Highway to the south.-- 1 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The applicant wishes to establish a lot for the sale of used cars. The applicant has concurrently applied for Temporary Use approval for one year from City Council. Access to the lot is available from the Chevron station on the corner of Pacific Highway and Walnut. In addition, parking will be available on the Chevron lot. The applicant has agreed to gravel the portion of the lot where cars will be parked. 4. Agency and NPO Comments Commenting agencies have no objections to the proposal. 8. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposed activity is consistent with the ,approval criteria set forth in Section 19.114.050 C. of the Code. The use will be temporary; safe access and adequate parking is available; no hazards to pedestrians are apparent; and no adverse off—site impacts are anticipated. r, a NOTICE OF DECISION TU 5"5 PAGE i M1F C. DECISION Temporary Use Permit 1U 5b-e5 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. This permit is valid until October 5, 1985. 2. A City of Tigard Business Tax permit shall be obtained by the applicant. 3. All areas to be used for parking of vehicles on the site shall be gravel. 4. Any signs used will need to be approved through the Building Department. D. PROCEDURE ' 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant 6 owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies i 2. Final Decision: E. THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON August 5, 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. August 5, 1985. 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171, oe 7/26/85 William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE APPROVED (KSL:dmj/1666P) 4 NOTICE OF DECISION TU 5b-85 PAGE 2 Jam x"MOMESAL t x444 S.W. 4A iR. 'TUU TIM, ®R 97062 (503) 692-4119 t r �Ott . ` x PLRPOS£i r -a a a ? LL To display approximately tt to 8 vehicles (all 1980 and Hexer) for the purpose of sales. All sits will be on each vehicle and there will be no attendert on the property. �'n; � r h % p u F � � � �� ti g,.F �r -.tr�,'� s Y x•�t- Y, ""31+'r QN v a �.: r � 1 t 1- t- co 7w, a z " ' j� ac► 3 ro cli ti .•.-�_..-�.--. .. a -- ,...xw+e..+va m....�uww�.srw.r.r.. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September A, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 20, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Irvington Moore Temporary Use TU 6-85 PREPARED BY: Liz Newton REQUESTED BY: Irvington Moore DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: —y� ——- CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Irvington Moore has filed an application with the City requesting a Temporary Use to allow an office trailer to be placed on their site for one year. Attached is a memo from the Planning Staff recommending approval of the applicant's request. In addition, a map and the applicant's narrative are also attached. Siting the trailer in the location as indicated by the applicant would remove some marked parking spaces which could possibly be relocated on the site. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the applicant's request 2. Approve the applicant's request with conditions as recommended by staff. 3. Deny the applicant's request. SUGGESTED ACTION _ (EANbs/1762P) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO:, City Council August 2.1, 1985 FROM: Elizabeth A. Newton, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Irvington Moore Temporary Use The Irvington Moore Forest Prod,a s Division located at 8205 SW Hunziker has filed an application requesting approval of a Temporary Use Permit. Due to a surge in the output of this facility, additional Engineering and Administrative personnel are needed. In order to accommodate this increase in business, Irvington Moore has requested Temporary Use approval for an office trailer to be placed on the site for one year. The Council may approve a Temporary Use Permit subject to the following: 1. Approval of the request shall be for a period not to exceed one year from the date of final approval; ( 2. The Council makes findings that all of the applicable approval criteria have been satisfied or can be satisfied through conditions of approval; 3. Notice shall be given as provided by 18.32.130; and 4. The approval may be subject to one renewal. The applicant is requesting approval for a one year period. Notice has been given as required by Section 18.32.120 of the Community Development Code. None of the criteria are applicable to this application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that TU 6-85 be approved for one year. Should the applicant wish to extend the use for an additional year, a renewal application shall be made prior to the expiration of the original permit. (EAN:bs/1762P) 4 Irv® gt NQE51mF , ore ;'rn i ,,, n. C? CTSU�iSI i! APPLICANT' S STATEMENT a Irvington-Moore has had a facility at this location for 25 years and has built up a >work force of over one hundred people. Our main product-line is Sawmill Machinery. Our impact on the economic well-being of Tigard has been significant over the years. A ) We are now experiencing a surge in our output that requires more Engineering and Administrative personnel . a Without a clear vision toward the trends in the Forest Products 3 Industry, it difficult to justifya nt ex our office facilities and therefore forcesmuseto looknaton of temporary office space. We are therefore applying fora permit for an office trailer on a one year basis , to accommodate this increase in business . We are attempting to locate the unit in the most inconspicuous location possible, to afford our production requirements and yet not have an unpleasing atmosphere for our neighbors, customers and personnel . P.O. Box 23038/Portiand,Oregon 87223/Phone (503) 620-O800/Telex 15-1141 , rr": z J t r 4i � i h ' i t`• IP i vt/ { f t t 4 a f 4 F 1 i a . ..QNB 4 , i q� ro 5w1 i ' i > r ; ,J 1 • ! 1 i t 4 i 1 Y ro v' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 26, 1985 AGENDA ITEM 0: !? DATE SUBMITTED: August 6, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: none ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Scholls West Building Inc. Annexation ZCA 10-85 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Ann Newton REQUESTED BY: Scholls West Bldg. Inc.__. DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATIONSUMMARY Scholls West Building Inc. who owns the Tigard Times building at 9730 SW Cascade submitted a petition for annexation to the City of Tigard in June. On July 9, 1985 a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission to consider the annexation request and the zoning on the property. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend to the Council that the annexation petition be forwarded to the Boundary Commission and that the zoning designation be changed from MA 1 to IP (Industrial Park). A copy of the applicant's request, a map showing the property and the staff report to the Planning Commission are attached. If the Council wishes to adopt the Planning Commission recommendation, a resolution is attached for your consideration. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Planning Commission recommendation and forwarding the proposal to the Boundary Commission. 2. Deny the applicant's proposal. SUGGESTED ACTION .. Adopt the attached resolution, approving the Planning Commission recommendation and forward the proposal to the Boundary Commission. (EAN:pm/1701P) CTION 27 TIS R 1 W W.M. is i L'lUU ;TON COUNTY OREGON SCALE I"= 100' to r:��. t Ci ql. WDiie 11 500 • •• / I� be corn a t ryrs t M mason rs.rnq�,a�un awwrl 000 een =py��p 5 . TTT111 300 41 1 SEE MAP 1> IS l 26C .._._ � 200` t~ I00 •b J 1-74 .�... #*--- L0 Z� a q, L.1 _• / =�ily�l rRrl S.W. A C,qs .,.. C, .f 1200 tt% lE.Af 50-94 0 4 s+ +D �Qtt SEE MAP 1260 \CJ► SEE MAP C;4 IS 134 AA 27 26 Element (E) for Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone Application Scholls West Bldg, , 9730 S.W. Cascade Blvd. , Tiga3�d, 0 97223 - ERTON Director of Planning CITY of TIGARD 12755 S.W. Ash P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 This letter is Element (C) of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment/ Zone Change Application As detailed in the application, we request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from MAI to IL and a Zone Change from MAI to IP. The purpose is to transfer the subject property into the city and to rename the zones consistent with city zone designation. Present use as a commercial office building is consistant with the Comprehensive Use Plan. We plan no change in the activities on this already-developed property. The property is bounded on the north and east by Highway 227 and on the west by Scholls Ferry Road. These two main arterials act as substantial physical barriers separating the subject property from Beaverton to the north. Hence it would seem most logical to join t, Tigard which is immediately adjacent across S.W. Cascade Blvd. to the south. The pe-imary advantage for joining the city is for the Scholls West Building to come under the protection of the Tigard Police Department. Thank you very much for considering this request. Sincerely, PPraomes B. Dough r rty peManager JBD:mb r STAFF. REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION July 9,_1985 TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT CONFERENCE: ROOM 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: ZCA 10-85 REQUEST: A request to annex a 1.11 acre parcel into the City of Tigard and to change the zoning on the property from Washington County MA 1 to City of Tigard IP. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial ZONING DESIGNATION: MAI APPLICANT: Scholls West Bldg. OWNER: Same P.O. Box 10188 Eugene, Oregon 97440 LOCATION: 2. Background The City has not processed any other development applications on this property. 3. Vicinity Information The property south of the site across Cascade Blvd. is within the City of Tigard, is zoned I-P and is occupied by Portland Chain. The subject property is bordered on the west by Scholls Fy. and on the east by the Hwy. 217 on ramp. The property lies on the northern tip of the City of Tigard's Planning Area. 4. Site Information There is a two story office building with associated parking and landscaping on the site. The property is the only remaining parcel in the immediate area that is within the City's Planning Area but not within the City limits. 5. Agency and NPO Comments None of the agencies contacted returned objections or comments to the proposal. B. FININDS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, and 14; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3 , 18.136 and Chapter 18.138 of the Community Development Code. The Planning Staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the following findings: a. Statewide Planning Goal #1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizen Involvement program including review of all development applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO). In addition, all public notice requirements were meta b. Statewide Planning Goal #2 is met because the City applied all applicable " Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Development Code requirements to the application. C. Goal #14 is met because the City and Washington County have adopted an Urban Planning Area Agreement which provides policies for annexation of property from Washington County into the City. The Planning Staff has determined that the proposal as submitted is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: a. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning ( Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. b Plan Policy 10.1,1 is satisfied because the required services either currently are provided or can be adequately provided to the site. C. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the annexation will not create an irregular boundary or an island, the Police Department has been notified of the annexation and the land is located within Tigard's Urban Planning Area. d. Plan Policy 10.1.3 is satisfied because upon annexation the land will be zoned the City zoned which most closely conforms to the County zoning designation. The Planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: a. Chapter 18.136 is met because the applicant has met all of the approval standards. b. Chapter 18.138 is met because the land does not meet the definition of buildable land so it shall not be designated as_ a "developing area", or "established area". C. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval of ZCA 10-85 to the City Council including approval of the zoning designation from MA 1 to IP. PREPARED BY: ` Elizabeth A. Newton AP ROVED BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director of Planning 6 Development (EAN:cz/1566P) a • F. I 1 iCAIE �..= 100 D,tb ra.. 4•. T�4 t 5U0 nO ti,c.tit wn�..w wo O '� I SNi r%�rtyQ � O PM ,lap G 40U ,! rn : 51-75 z i Q :i ! . 300 - i 1J, l 'f 1 SEE iAA? / 200 tS 1 26C ?'A,: � X00 1\ ` -o 5l-74 • Y o \V u,r• T .LS b�tl� \ 50-9 4 S.VJ C40 «� 1 1200 ©� \ 50-94 00 �e 49 71- 4. .�G 0 �O SEE MAP so \ 5 1 26C �rt SEE MAP 27 26 (GIs I) Element (E) for Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone-- Application Scholls West Bldg. , 9730 S.W. Cascade Blvd. , Tigard, % 97223 `� BEAVERTON - CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 28, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: none ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Schenk/Perrin ZCA 12-85 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton REQUESTED BY: Planninq_Commission DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: � 4 671�1 CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On August 6, 1985, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission to consider annexation of .80 acres into the City of Tigard. The property is owned by Kevin Perrin and Daniel Schenk and is located on the north side of SW North Dakota, north of SW 92nd Avenue. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend to City Council that the annexation be forwarded to the Boundary Commission with a modification to include any portions of the right-of-way of SW North Dakota which is not in the City. Attached are the Planning Commission minutes, a location map, and the staff report. The City Council should hold the public hearing and direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the applicant's original request or the Planning Commission recommendation. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1, Deny the applicant's request. 2. Direct staff to prepare a resolution forwarding the applicant's request to the Boundary Commission. 3. Direct staff to prepare a resolution forwarding the Planning Commission recommendation to the Boundary Commission. f SUGGESTED ACTION Wold the public hearing and direct staff to prepare a resolution supporting the City Council's position. (EAN:pm/1780P) STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.2 AUGUST 6. 1985 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION TIGARD_SCHOOL DISTRICT - BOARD ROOM 13137 SW Pacific Highway _TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: ZCA 12-85 REQUEST: A request to annex 80 acres into the City of Tigard and to change the zoning designation from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5., COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: Washington County R-5 APPLICANT: Kevin P. Perrin OWNER: same Daniel J. Schenk 9401 SW 4th Avenue Portland, OR 97219 LOCATION: North side of SW North Dakota, north of SW 92nd Ave. (WCTM 1S1 3509 Lot 8400) 2. Background The City has not processed any other land use applications on this property. 3. Vicinity Information The property to the north and west is designated in the county for residential development - 5 units per acre. The property to the east and across SW North Dakota to the south is developed as residential and zoned R-4.5. 4. Site Information The property is vacant and slopes gradually to the north. Thera are some oak trees on the property and the site is quite overgrown with blackberries. There are no immediate plans to develop but the applicant w wishes to annex to be able to obtain sewer service at the time of development. S. ft envy and NPO Comments No comments were received from NPO N2. ` STAFF REPORT - ZCA'12-85 PAGE 1 The Tigard Police Department reviewed the proposal and had no objections. School District #233 has reviewed the proposal and has no objections. The City's Engineering Division has the following comments: "The sanitary sewer line located. within SW North Dakota Street was a part of the "old" Metzger sewer system. said system having been acquired by U.S.A. While U.S.A. says 'All lines under 24" DIA., within the City, are the Citys' , the City has never acknowledged such. . . Maintenance responsibility being the concern. "Policy" need be made here." No other written comments have been received. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1. 2. and 14; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3 and Chapter 18.136 of the Community Development Code. The Planning Staff concludes - that the proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the followins findings: a. Statewide Planning Goal #1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizen Involvement program' including review of all development applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO). In addition, all public notice requirements were met. b. Statewide Planning Goal #2 is met because the City applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Development Code requirements to the application. C. Goal #14 is met because the City and Washington county have adopted an Urban Planning Area Agreement which provides policies for annexation of property from Washington County into the City. The Planning Staff has determined that the proposal as submitted is " consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: a. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. b. Plan Policy 10.1.1 is satisfied because the required services either currently are provided or can be adequately provided to the site. C. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the annexation will not create an irregular boundary or an island, the Police Department has commented on the annexation and the land is located within w Tigard's area► of interest. STAFF REPORT - ZCA 12-85 PAGE 2 { d. Plan Policy 10.1.3 is satisfied because upon annexation the land f- will be zoned the City zoning designation which most closely 4 conforms to the County zoning designation. The Planning ,staff has determined .that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the: findings noted below: a. Chapter 18.136 is met because the applicant has met all of the approval standards. b. Chapter"18.138 is met because the land is not designated as a "developing area" on the Development Standards Area Map so it will be designated as an Established Area, C. REO"ENDATTON Based upon the above findings and conclusions. the Planning Staff recommends approval of ZCA 12-85 subject to the following conditions: 1. The property shall be designated as an "established area" on the Development Standard Areas map. 2. All future development on the property shall be reviewed and* approved by the City of Tigard. hvv l PREPARED BY: EiizabmftA Newton APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director of Community Development (EAN:pm/1681P) STAFF;_REPORT - ZCA 12-85 - PAGE 9 Air. low sell � z tu In ML, FOWLER JR. HIGH SCHO ■ ` , �'�# mfr Q`�� ► i., `1 ��� 1 �• �,, n■M• +� .+ • ■ �� • ;,� r♦ice' ' .�'�.:...�:. ■ .--.■., �- gra 4�• � / � , '. E71lit II >. _®�� ®mss■ y S a 35 AC —, 2� 120 I c 9001 A .28 Ac. IAJ JQ 0101 f 104.73 1 25 It w _ w-e+ .8904 m <100 o ;6 Ac. 481.05 8200 7800 .. or t3f�00 8400 .� .20 Ac 2t Ar. 3 . c . c"" P 957 A80 Ac I-M • _ _ r1 m [f a 5 saoo s tr' r� 8111 7981 + $ ./7 AC 64 ; 20 AG /9 Ac i_ N I SEE MAP 350A 8700 .7 8500 8300 o i; •8000 N .dS Ac d _ o .IT At. $ �� At o 2 A 9200 _ — 71En O 0/ At. too 73 2W I ro . 15 83.8660 • 2s u.2s 9s sous,. � N$ o4vlO c si iILIC 3000 5 v TO PUBLIC 2ff 2 = NORTH liMa IOMM C 116.94 N i1�ITIAL e9° 54'9 167.E 111.36 JJ �� !a � INITIA Nis-s� E tfs.f so INITIAL POINT R.2o Ft o 2200 POINT X3300 _ � 4200 a 2300 I60 `� I 9 N w Of 16 ° " " 6 g 1 „ a w I I Baso ST60 H 49*"'sr / Z N e6°22'9 1193 30 40014 w �, _ _ i"4- 2400 — 2100 t Is 2 a Q4101 .. 5 - 2 �7301Q3 �' = o i5 + h 1ls: 196.9 so .ss s c 7200 L� 8 N 4 .a; '—' ne"Wa 12 4400 — foai Isf.s �. 13a1a 1/4.27 3 a 10014 0 2500 : 2000 19 ----�� 714 196.9 �.I a 14 0 4 n ?, i 1 • 4 \ — A•40 M 5510 s� 0 4500 4 1w � t S� s ,� 46 r i' 3 -m o 40�.. h ! 690 49 IN 525.2 .464.4 2 sn 13 C M 2601 °' N 0 j ' lag'sINITIAL PT. L- 4601 , 5400 r 5 N 890 34'93 3900 {2 c' 444 2604 2603 .4/Ac 26 Ac. 4600 200.03 _ 55006 11 t . 23 67.43 3800 N 64 so, E 1900 n I i 2700 Z e 2 26 185.1 w n_ .w TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 6, 1985 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. . The meeting was held at the Tigard School District Building - Conference Room - 13137 SW Pacific Highway. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Butler, Peterson, Fyre, Bergmann, Vanderwood. Absent: Commissioners Campbell and Leverett. 3 APPROVAL OF MINUTES o Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to adopt the minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION o There was no communication. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE .PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-85 and ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 11-85 { Request to annex 23.26 acres into the City of Tigard and to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Washington County Residential 24 units per acre to City of Tigard Medium High density and the zoning from Washington County Residential 24 units/acre to City of Tigard R-25. Located: SW 135th and north of Scholls Ferry Road, NPO # 7. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the staff report and explained that staff had received additional requests from adjoining property owners, through Ryan O'Brien, to be included with this annexation. Discussion followed. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Russell Krueger, 3515 SW Barbur Blvd. Y-1, Portland, 97201, stated that with the annexation of his property it would make it easier for the extension of Murray Blvd, and that there would be half street improvements constructed along the edge of his property line. " Ryan O'Brien, 1134 SE 23rd Ave. , Hillsboro, OR 97123, showed a map indicating Krueger's property and other properties interested in annexing to the City of Tigard. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Gail Stover, Rt. 1 Box 381, Beaverton, OR 97007, opposed" the annexation. She did not feel that the City of Tigard should extend its City limits beyond Scholls Ferry Rd. She felt annexation to City of Beaverton would be more appropriate because they are in the PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUTES August 6, 1985 Page 1 Beaverton School District, they would have an opportunity to become a part of the Tualatin Hills Recreation District, and two of the residents were already on Beaverton water. She had poled her neighbors who live in the area and four of them have petitioned the City of Beaverton for annexation. o Jim Cowley, Rt 1 Box 365A, Beaverton, OR 97007, opposed the annexation. He wants the area to be annexed to City of Beaverton. REBUTTAL a Ryan O'Brien stated that most of the residents who live in that area, within the City _ of Tigard limits, are in the Beaverton School District. Also, it is not unusual for water districts to cross city limit boundaries. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Owens arrived. 0 Discussion followed regarding the City Council's direction, water districts, fire districts, Tualatin Hills Recreation District, the school districts, adding additional properties to the annexation request. and wetlands. o CommissionersButler, Fyre, Vanderwood, and Bergmann favored the annexation. Commissioners Peterson and Moen had concerns because of the different districts involved. # Commissioner Bergmann moved and Commissioner Vanderwood seconded to forward CPA 9-85 and ZC 11-85 to City Council, adding the additional properties who wish to be annexed to the City of Tigard, with a recommendation for approval. Also, ask City Council to attempt action to mitigate the concerns regarding split districts for schools, recreation districts, and water districts. Motion carried by majority vote of Commissioners present, Commissioners Moen and Peterson voting no, Commissioner Owens abstained. 5.2 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 12-85 KEVIN PERRIN/DANIEL SCHENK NPO # 2 A request to annex .80 acres into the City of Tigard and to change the zoning designation from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5. The property is located on the north side of SW North Dakota, north of SW 92nd Ave. (WCTM 1S1 3508 lot 8400). Senior Planner Newton made staff's recommendation for approval with two conditions. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Kevin Perrin, 9401 SW 4th, Portland, 97219, explained that they would like to annex to the City so sewer would be available to the property to make it saleable. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Beatrice B. Shewmaker, 11270 SW 92nd, opposed the annexation. She did not feel the property was buildable because of the water problem. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 6, 1985 Page 2 o Steve' Scarratt, 9165 SW North Dakota, opposed the annexation because of the condition of the road and the water problems. Also, lots 7900 and 8100 had been built on and the housos have been vacant for two years. Discussion followed regarding the condition of the road. o Jan Scarratt, 9165 SW North Dakota, opposed the annexation. She felt the property should be left as open space/greenway because of the water'problems. o Alan DeRosia, 9205 SW North Dakota, opposed the annexation because he felt the lot was unbuildable because of the water problems. He was told the street would be improved when he purchased his property and nothing had been done. Discussion followed regarding the drainage problem. REBUTTAL o Kevin Perrin, sympathized and agreed with the surrounding property owners. He felt if he was annexed, steps could be taken to alleviate the road and drainage problems. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Discussion followed regarding annexing the street, and how to ensure that the drainage problem would be resolved prior to development of the property. o President Moen, suggested that the adjoining property owners who were in the County might join in the annexation, as he felt tp.e City would be more willing to resolve their problems. Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner Peterson • seconded to forward ZCA 12-85 to City Council recommending approval, adding that as much of North Dakota be annexed as possible; and modifying condition number two so that the drainage concerns be addressed prior to development of the property. Motion carried unanimously by # y Commissioners present. RECESS: 8:50 RECONVENE: 9:00 5.3 ZOA 4-85 CITY Of TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Review of Chapters 18.56, 18.58, 18.136, 18.142, 18.64, 18.114, 18.106, 18.48, 18.54, 18.60,_ 18.62, 18.68, 18.70, 18.72, Senior Planner Newton reviewed staff's proposed changes. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Geraldine Ball, NPO 0 4, commented that they were concerned with directional signs allowing the names or logo to be displayed. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 6, 1985 Page 3 , . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM#: ll DATE SUBMITTED: August 28, `1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: none ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Krueger Annexation CPA 9-85 ZCA 11-85 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton REQUESTED BY: Planning Commission DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: + i CITY ADMINISTRATOR: ------ _" POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On August 6, 1985, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission to consider annexation of 23.26 acres into the City of Tigard. The property is owned by Margery Krueger and is located east of Murray Blvd. between Old and New Schalls Ferry Road. After thn _pplication was filed and prior to the Planning Commission meeting, twu additional petitions were received for annexation bringing the total acreage to 41.64 acres. The Planning Commission voted 4-2 with one abstention to forward the 41.64 acre request to the City Council for approval. Since that hearing, additional residents in the area have expressed an interest in annexation. Staff suggests that the City Council hold the public hearing and determine whether or not additional property should be added to the proposal prior to submission to the Boundary Commission. --- ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Deny the request. 2. Hold the public hearing and direct staff to prepare a resolution forwarding annexation of the 41.64 acres to the Boundary Commission as recommended by the Planning Commission, 3. Open the public hearing, continue it and direct staff to prepare a new public notice and ad to include all interested property owners in the annexation resolution. SUGGESTED ACTION F direct staff to prepare an ordinance approving the Open the public hearing and , Planning Commission recommendation or direct staff to readvertise including all interested property owners and hold a new public hearing. .a (EANpm/1778P) TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 6, 1985 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. . The meeting was held at the Tigard School District Building - Conference Room - 13137 SW Pacific Highway.' 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Butler, Peterson, Fyne, Bergmann, Vanderwood. 0Lv-ry - Absent: Commissioners Campbell and Leverett. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES o Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to adopt the minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION CONM"IUNICATION o There was no communication. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-85 and ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 11-85 Request to annex 23,26 acres into the City of Tigard and to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Washington County Residential 24 units per acre to City of Tigard Medium High density and the zoning from Washington County Residential 24 units/acre to City of Tigard R-25. Located: SW 135th and north of Scholls Ferry Road, NPO # 7. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the staff report and explained that staff had received additional requests from adjoining property owners, through Ryan O'Brien, to be included with this annexation. Discussion followed. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Russell Krueger, 3515 SW Barbur Blvd. Y-1, Portland, 97201, stated that with the annexation of his property it would make it easier for the extension of Murray Blvd. and that there would be half street improvements - constructed along the edge of his property line. r Ryan O'Brien, -1134 SE 23rd Ave. , Hillsboro, OR 97123, showed a map indicating Krueger's property and other properties interested in annexing to- the City of Tigard. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o : Gail Stover, Rt. 1 Box . '381, , Beaverton, OR 97007, opposed ' the annexation. She did not feel that the City .-of Tigard should extend its City. limits beyond Scholls Ferry Rd. Shefelt annexation to City af_ Beaverton would be more: appropriatebecause they-,;are :in the PLANNING`COMMISSION MINUTES August 6, 1985 Page 1 Beaverton School District, they would have an opportunity to become a part of the Tualatin Hills Recreation District, and two of the residents were already on Beaverton water. She had poled her neighbors who live in the area and four of them have petitioned the City ofBeavertonfor annexation. o Jim Cowley, Rt 1 Box 365A, Beaverton, OR 97007, opposed the annexation. He want's the area to be annexed to City of Beaverton. REBUTTAL o Ryan O'Brien stated that most of the residents who live in that area, within the City of Tigard limits, are in the Beaverton School District._ Also, it is not unusual for water districts to cross city limit boundaries �{{ PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 9 Commissioner Owens arrived. o Discussion followed regarding the City Council's direction, water districts, fire districts, Tualatin Hills Recreation District, the school districts, adding additional properties to.. the annexation request, and wetlands • o Commissioners _Butler, Eyre, Vanderwood, and Bergmann favored the annexation. Commissioners Peterson and Moen had `concerns because of the different districts involved. i * Commissioner Bergmann moved and Commissioner Vanderwood seconded to forward CPA 9-85 and ZC 11-85 to City Council, adding the additional �..-operties who wish to be annexed to the City of Tigard, with a scommendation for approval. Also, ask City Council to attempt action to mitigate the concerns regarding split districts for schools, recreation districts, and water districts. Motion carried by majority vote of Commissioners present, Commissioners Moen and Peterson voting no, Commissioner-Owens abstained. 5.2 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 12-85 KEVIN PERRIN>OANIEL SCHENK NPO !t 2 A request to annex .80 acres into the City of Tigard and to change the zoning designation from Washington County R=5 to City of Tigard R--4.5. The property is located on the north side of SW North Dakota, north of SW 92nd Ave. (WCTM 1S1 35DB lot 8400). Senior Planner Newton made staff's recommendation for approval with two conditions. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION ' o Kevin Perrin, 9401 SW 4th, Portland, 97219, explained that they would like to annex to the City so 'sewer would-be available to the property .x to make it saleable. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Beatrice B. Shewmaker, 11270 SW 92nd, 'opposed the annexation. She did not feel the property was buildable because of the water problem. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 6, 1985 Page,2 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.1 AUGUST 6 1985 TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD ROOM 13137 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: ZCA 11-85 & CPA 9-85 REQUEST: A request to annex 23.26 acres into the City of Tigard and to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Washington County Residential 24 units per acre to City of Tigard Medium High density and the zoning from Washington County Residential 24 units/acre to City of Tigard R-25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Wash. Co. Residential 24 units/acre ZONING DESIGNATION: Wash. Co. Residential 24 units/acre APPLICANT: Russell Krueger OWNER: Margery Krueger 3515 SW Barbur Blvd, Rt. 1, Box 792 Portland, OR 97201 Beaverton, OR 97005 LOCATION: 2. Backaround No other applications have been filed with the City on this property. 3. Vicinity Information All of the surrounding property is designated and zoned in the County as residential, 16-24 units per acre. Most of the property is developed as large lot home sites. 4. Site Information The site under consideration is fairly fiat and the majority is planted with berries. The applicant wishes to annex to obtain building permits and to become part of the Tigard Community. 5. Agency and NPO Comments Na written comments were received from NPO #7. The City of Tigard Building Department reviewed the proposal and had no objections to it. School District #48 had the following comments: k?. .. STAFF REPORT - ZCA 11-85, CPA 9-85 - PAGE 1 "Annexation of this property to the City of Tigard would not have any student impact on Beaverton School District 'until such time as the w. property is developed. Although the property will be in the City of Tigard, it will still remain within the Beaverton School District. Please advise us on plans for development." The Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation had the following comments: "The Washington County Department of land Use and Transportation is concerned that annexation of this property would create an illogical boundary between Tigard and Beaverton, would decrease community identity and may adversely affect the proposed Murray Boulevard/135th extension." The City of Tigard Engineering Division has the following comments: "An Urban Services Study for this area has not been done. Transportation — property will be served by Murray Blvd. extension on the west and Scholls Fy, Rd. on the east. Sanitary Sewer Service will be provided by the City through the Scholls FY, trunkline. Water The Applicant shall provide the City with a statement from the appropriate water service agency that service is available. Storm Drainage Drainage runs into Summercreek which is part of Tigard's storm drainage master plan. GeneralU__tilities — Written verification from all pertinent utilities that services can be provided shall be provided to the City." A copy of a letter received from the Tigard Water District is attached. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, and 14; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 8.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3 and Chapter 18.136 of the Community Development Code, and the provisions of the City of Tigard/Washington County Urban Planning Area Agreement. The Planning Staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the Goals and Guidelines based upon the applicable Statewide Planning following findings: a, Statewide Planning Goal #1 is met because the City has adopted a ; Citizen Involvement program including review of all development applications by, the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO): In 4' addition, all public notice requirements were meta u PAGE 2 STAFF REPORT — ZCA 11=85, CPA 9-85 — „µ_ b.- Statewide Planning Goal #2 is met because the City applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Development Code requirements to the application. C. Goal 014 is met because the City and Washington County have adopted an Urban Planning Area Agreement which provides policies for annexation of property from Washington County into the City. The Planning Staff has determined that the proposal as submitted is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: a. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an _opportunity, to comment on the applicant's proposal. b. Plan Policy 8.1.2 is satisfied because the Cities of Tigard and Beaverton and Washington County_ are actively working towards resolving the Murray Boulevard/135th Avenue extension alignment. C, Plan Policy 10.1.1 is satisfied because the services required for urban development can be adequately provided to the site. d. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the annexation will not create an irregular boundary or an island, the Police Department has been notified and the land is located within Tigard's area of interest. e. Plan Policy 10.1.3 is satisfied because upon annexation, the land will be zoned the City zoning designation which most closely conforms to the zoning designation. The Planning Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: a. Chapter 18.136 is met because the applicant has met all of the approval standards. b. Chapter 18.138 is met because the land meets the definition for buildable lands as defined by OAR 660-07-000 and shall be designated as "developing area" on the Development Standards Area Map. The City of Tigard has an Urban Planning Area Agreement with Washington County. The agreement allows the City to consider annexations in the City's Area of Interest. This property is within the City's Area of Interest. The City of Beaverton also shows this as an area of interest. On July 10, 1985 the City Councils of Beaverton and Tigard met and agreed to split the Area of Interest between Old Scholls Fy, and Scholls Fy. Rd. at a line which would extend Murray Blvd. south. (See attached Map.) In addition, the City of Beaverton City Council intends to adopt a resolution to be submitted to the Boundary Commission supporting this annexation. STAFF REPORT ZCA 11-85, CPA 9-85 - PAGE 3 C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings and -conclusions, the Planning Staff recommends approval of ZCA 11-85, CPA 9-85 subject to the following conditions: 1. The property shall be designated as a "developing area" on the Development Standard Areas map. 2. All future development on the property shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Tigard, 3. The City of Tigard Police Department shall review the proposal PREPARED BY: iflizabetH A. Newton APPROVE OD BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director of Community Development (EAN:pm/1685P) y.t STAFF. REPORT -. ZCA 11-85, CPA 9-85 = PAGE4 RYAN O'BRIEN Planning Consultant The Old Library Building s HIIISboro,Ore )n 97123 • (503) 648-4061 209 NE Lincoln Street Suite pBn Liz Newton August 2, 1985 City of Tigard Planning Department P.O. Box 23557 " SUBJECT: Annexation and Zone Chzngs of property between 135th Avenue and Murray Boulevard,, south of Scholls Ferry Road. On behalf of the property owners on the attached map, we are requesting that Tax Lots 600, 604, 602, 700, 301, 800, 1300, 1301, and 1302 be added to the Krueger Annexation and zone change.. These lots are shown on the attached map. Also, Tax Lot 400 and 300 may also went to annex. We indicatid to all these property owners that we need their signed petition before the Planning Commission meeting on August 6, 1985. We are hoping that this information can be,presented to the Planning Commission at that meeting so they are aware oVthe annexation support in the area. We are requesting that these properties be included in the advertizing for the City Council meeting so they can be processed with the Krueger annexation. These property owners were contacted in the past regarding annexation to the City, but there didn't seem to be any support. Now it appears that there is significant support. _ We are hoping that our proposal of advertizing these now properties for the City Council meeting would be appropriate. I know that the City of Tigard has done this in the past. In fact* many properties have been included in annexations by the Boundary Commission at their hearing. We are also hoping that the Krueger annexation not be held up because he is very anxious- to begin planning for development of the property. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S erely, -- y O'Brien �s i } ark v47 k,. /15 swi,4 SECTION 33 T IS R IW W.M. •aSw vG TON C,-.,-7 oreGON C SCAT[ -'•zoo -f,%, ..•,�'// � 300 Ste iZ, ///�' ►s • c-.� �" i►� :µ` 400 Soo to 0 500 11 pr et t)o ! O, s u wo i 4 ..w tic t*n ArimEA 5.1 -78 (sem/ A0V 44 SECT! v 1 T'7 �. ,, S '. T ZS R I V1 Vlt. ivY Li Am LOT 02 2• \� v/ - AT � ,. i,_i' !i i�,l �i_„i t. ..i,�,,,,i, ; i " ';1 -ri 1 ;[ i�: 1: - - • . . � " ; .. • • '. • ' -��. ... • �'� � _- �,� .. � � '" ►. �► - . •. }` .. �. w� � �. Y � `• � : E`: y ,,,. - � ; • :- ,. .., ;;., � .. .:,; ,;._ r '�- R � • ` a - f,. !: .�,. ,�_ � •. _ `' . t s _ . ♦. • � �� �_, � • • 'M. • � t t. 7 .;* � ,, F � ". a +►. �, �� s • - ,�., ;" ��.;�� �: � �� �� _ � .. rr _ . k "�r "'. �" .' �. �:i .. ��, .. ■ - ���: '1j �r. �. �: � - S �� ` • y 5 1 G - rt' - ��._ _ Y RYAN O'BRIEN Planning Consultant 1134 S.E. 23rd Ave. Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • (503) 648-4061 ZONE CHANGE REQUEST Date: June 10, 1985 Applicant: - Russ Kreuger Property Owner: Margery F. Kreuger Legal Description: Tax Lots 601 , 1100, 1101 , and a portion of 1000, Map 1S1-33C. Area: 23.26 acres. Location: Between New and Old Scholls Ferry Roads, east of Murray Blvd. Request: Re-zone from County R24 to City R-20. INTRODUCTION This zone change is required along with annexation to the City of Tigard. No specific development plans have been prepared for the property. This zone change and annexation is only intended to make the property ready for development. LAND USE The subject property is fairly flat and in agricultural production. There are a few mature trees and a couple of drainage swales that transverse Tax Lot 601 . These physical limitations will not inhibit development. Surrounding property is agriculture or rural residences. A large apartment complex in the City of Beaverton is planned for development directly west of the subject property. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES Policy 2.1 ._1_. - Citizen Review - This application will be reviewed by a Citizen Group. Policies 3. 4.1 and 3. 4•2 - Protect natural habitats of plants and animals, ani require PUD' s in designated timber areas. These policies will be applied during site review process. .v Policy 6.1 .1 - Diversify housing densities. This zone change will help provide density diversity. Pa ge 2 Kreuger Zone Change Policy 6.4.1 Encourage flexible and efficient development. Ea��ilities. Development shall be conditioned on availability of ces and facilities. This property has sewer and storm Water can be easily extended according to the Tigard Water District. Policies 8.1`. 1 8.1 .2 and 8.1 .3 The City shall provided safe and transportation system to meet growth needs. portation facilities are available. The property has access to both new and old Scholls Perry Roads. This site is a very important link in the Murray Extention. Polic 8.2.2 - Encourage transit usage by locating intensive uses next o transit routes. Transit is _available to this .site. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA 1 . This area is not committed to low density urban housing. 2. This site can be buffered from existing urban low density development to maximize privacy. 3. This property has direct access to a major collector and arterial roads. 4. This site is not subject to development limitations. 5. Utilities, services and facilities have adequate capacity. b. Transit is within J mile. 7. Commercial is planned within J mile. 8. Private open space will be provided when development of the site occurs. COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE This application fully complies with this code. LCDC GOALS Goal 1 Citizen Involvement - will be provided through the hearing process and the NPO program. Goal 2 - Land Use Planning - this application complies with the zone changer procedures established by the City. Goal -5 Preserve Open Space and Natural 'Areas - This will be provided. Pa ge 3 L. Kreuger Zone Change Goal 7 Natural Hazards' None exist on the property except for the drainage swales. Goal 8 - Recreational Needs - Adequate recreation and open space will be provided on site. Goal 10 - Housing - This application will help provide a needed housing type in the general area. Goal 11 Public Facilities, - All are available to the subject property. Goal 12 Transportation Adequate facilities are available to serve is property. Detailed traffic studies will be prepared when development occurs. <3 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Au ust 26 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: AGENDA OF: PREVIOUS ACTION: City Council approved DATE SUBMITTED: Ru ust 2 1985 Resolution on May 20, 1985, forwarded ISSUE/AGENDA .TITLE: Davis annexation re uest to BoundaryComm. PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Ann Newton Annexation Zone Chane REQUESTED BY: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY on May 20, 1985, the City Council adopted, a resolution to forward the Davis annexation request to the Boundary Commission, however, no zoning designation at that orcomprehensive plan 'designations were assigned to the property1985, On time. The Boundary Commission approved the annexation 'on of 1 Tigard Planning July 9, 1985 a public hearing was held before the City Commission to consider zoning on the property. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward Staff's recommendation on the zoning designation to copy of the minutes and Staff's recommendation City Council. A recommendation, an Should the Council wish to adopt the Planning Commission ordinance is attached for you consideration. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Adopt the attached ordinance Modify the attached ordinance. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached ordinance. (EANibs/1694P) 10440 S-W- '"h Ave. Portland, or. 97223 September 3, 1985 ve n Tigard City Council yL.. Tigard, Oregon Cf S n� Dear Members of City Council: ?" Having been residents at the above address since 1947, we're well aware of the drainage and flooding problems of the immediate area. As far back as the winter of 1951-'52, w1lan it was largely ;open country- from Alpenrose dairy to Metzger, we've seen Hall Blvd. flooded. In a matter of minuThis water covered the second of our 4 back steps. resulted from rain melting several inches of snow. At that time, flood water drained off our property in about 30 minutes after the rain stopped. Now, with the 217 Interchange and more buildings, water continues to back up onto our property even after it stops rain- ing. About six ;;ears ago, following 30 minutes of heavy resin, without the snow, iiall Blvd. and Oak Street were again flooded• as were our steps. Throughout the 38 years we 've lived here, water has touched our foundation many times. In winters with heavy rain, the flooding has occured 2 pr 3 times. We carry flood insurance, which is costly, but pray that we will never have to use it. Until the drainage problem in this area is solved, we ask that you do not allow the 4.5 residential units per acre% and restrict commercial building.per acre which is covered by buildings or asphalt, compounds our problem, as well as others in the surrounding area. Res ectfully `ubmitted, a ' Do and el Lyon 5 P.S. We regret not being able to attend the public hear- ing because of vacation. August 2,1935 Tigard City Council 12755 S.W.Ash P.O. Box 23397 Tigard,Or._97223 - Members City Council, File No CPA 8-35 And ZC 9-85 Ow ners: Gene and Virginia Davis Randv Juno-Wirth Zaida Rigler Jata Corn. The Area under consideration in this File represents an area that has been annexed to Tigard with the proposed- zoning that applied in Washington County be apnlied to Tigard equivalent zoning. I want to express the importance f to me;and our area, that the significant wetlands designation also be applied, The area of these lots that lie in the 100 year flood plain should be given careful consideration by the planning dept,to preserve the drainage water storage feature as well as the open parklike appearance. I believe both of these features are important but of primary concern would be the potential flooding, of the area unsn,!am from this flood plain. Sincerely, Shirley ,I.Row 10370 S,W. 90th Tigard,Or. 97223 s-4 gwr ,. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JULY 9, 1985 �M 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. . The meeting was held at the Tigard School District Building Conference Room 13137 SW Pacific Highway. 2. ROLL CALL: Present President Moen; Commissioners Owens, Butler, 'Peterson, Campbell, Fyre, Bergmann, and Leverett. Absent: Commission Vanderwood 3 APPROVAL OF MINUTES o President Moen noted two typographical errors Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to approve the minutes with corrections. Motion carried by majority of Commissioner present. Commissioners Fyre and Bergmann abstained. 4. COMMISSION COMMUNICATION o Senior Planner Newton stated that Item 5.3, an annexation request by Russell Krueger, would be set over to the August 6th Planning Commission Hearing. o Commissioner Owens commented she had stopped at Elmer's Pancake house and had talked with them about their denial and options for using temporary signs. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 7-85 CITY OF TIGARD Review of Volume I - Resource Document where it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge Ravine. Also, a review of the Tigard Flood plain and Wetlands Map as it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge Ravine. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for denial. She stated that Frank Currie, the City Engineer was available for any questions. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Mrs. Geraldine Ball, 11515 SW 91st, submitted and read into the record a letter (with maps) supporting changes to Volume I of the Comprehensive Plan. o Lou Christen, 17895 SW Shasta, Tualatin, stated that Red Rock Creek had never originated beyond _I-5. It originated close to the OEA property: He supported changing the document to reflect that Red Rock Creek originates on the west side of I-5. �M1•' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 9, 1985 Page 1 O Discussion followed regarding .where Red Rock Creek -originated. What change was being proposed to the plan. The difference between a waterway and a ravine, and why staff was recommending denial of any change. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: o Consensus of the Commission was that the drainage for Red Rock Creek does originate on Mt. Sylvania, even though Red Rock Creek does not exist on the east side of I-S. Also Villa Ridge Ravine is not a waterway and should not be listed on Page 58 (Volume I) of the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to recommend that the next time the Comprehensive Plan is updated to modify the plan to state that "Red Rock Creek located west of I--5, the fourth largest tributary of Fanno Creek, is fed from drainage flowing southeasterly. . . ..'°, Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 2-85 ZC 8-85 DAVIS NPO # 4 A request to assign Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to property to be annexed to the City of Tigard. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the history explaining that City Council had approved the annexation. Now the Commission needs to assign Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to the property being annexed. f._ PUBLIC TESTIMONY Mrs. Geraldine Ball, 11515 SW 91st, representing NPO # 4, supported staff's recommendation as being most like the County's zoning. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Discussion followed regarding designating the property wetlands and why the lot number where different from the previous proposal. Commissioner Bergmann moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward CP 8-85 to City Council recommending approval of staff's recommendation. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner's present. 5.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-85, ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 11-85 RUSSELL KRUEGER (request to annex 23.26 acre to Tigard) NPO # 7 Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to set CPA 9-85 and ZCA 11-85 over to the August 6, 1985, Planning Commissioner hearing. 5.4 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 10-85 SCHOLLS WEST BUILDING INC. NPO # 7 Request to annex 1.11 acre parcel into the City of Tigard. Also, A request to change the Zoning on the property from Washington County MA 1 to City of Tigard IP. located: 9730 SW Cascade Blvd. (WCTM 1S1 2700 lot 100). PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 9, 1985 Page 2 _ Agenda Item 5.2 July 9, 1985 CPA 8-85 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO Planning Commission July 2, 1985 FROM Elizabeth Newton, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CPA 8-05 On March 5, 1985, the Planning Commission reviewed a request by Dr. Davis to annex 13.19 acres into the City of Tigard. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and voted to forward the annexation request to City Council. requesting that CPO N4 and the Metzger residents be informed of the hearing. `In addition, the Planning Commission requested that the. City Council return some indication of policy regarding future annexations in the Metzger area; a- copy of the minutes are attached. On May 20, 1985, the City Council approved a resolution forwarding the annexation of 28.94 acres of land into the City of Tigard. Three additional property owners requested that their property be included in the Davis annexation request. A copy of the minutes, resolution and map are attached. Section 18.32.090 of the Community Development Code requires that the Planning Commission make recommendations to the City Council on 'Lonirig and Comprehensive Plan designations for property to be annexed to the City. Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.3.1 states that the "City shall consider annexation requests outside the Urban Planning area and within the Urban Growth Boundary consistent with policies 10.1 and 10.2 and amendment of the agreement between the City and the County. A copy of the March 5, 1985 staff report outlining the proposal's conformance to Plan Policies 10.1. 1 and 10.1.2 is attached. The Metzger Progress Community Plan adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners designates a portion of this area as "area of special concern li8." A map showing the affected area is attached. The County has placed this designation on the area because of development constraints presented by the floodplain and wildlife, which is native to the area. The City of Tigard' s Comprehensive Plan contains a policy which is designwi to protect. significant wetlands. The policy reads as follows: "3.2.4 THE CITY SHALL PROHIBIT DEVELOPMENT WITHIN AREAS DESIGNATED AS SIGNAIFICANT WETLANDS ON THE FLOODPLAIN AND WETLANDS MAP. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL OCCUR ON PROPERTY ADJACENT TO AREAS DESIGNATED AS SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS ON THE' FLOODPLAIN, AND WETLANDS MAP WIl"I .' TWENTY FIVE (25) FEET OF THE DESIGNATED WETLANDS AREA.- DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY ADJACENT TO SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS SHALL BE ALLOWED UNDER THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SECTION OF THE CODE." - The City and County Planning Staffs have agreed that application by the City ` of the above policy to the area designated as ASC #8 would meet the intent of the County's policies. The Urban Planning area agreement between Washington County and the City of Tigard allows the City to .consider requests for annexations in the Area of Interest subject to the following a. The CITY shall not require annexation of lands in the Area of Interest as a condition to the provision of urban services for development. b. Annexations by the CI'T'Y within the Area of interest shall not create islands unless the CITY declares its intent to complete the island annexation. C. The C1 TY agrees in principle to a plebiscite or other representative means for annexation in the Metzger/Progress Community Planning Area, which includes Washington Square, within the CITY Area of Interest. Not contrary to the foregoing, the City reserves all of its rights to annex and acknowledges the rights of individual property owners to annex to the City pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes. d. Upon annexation of land within the area. of Interest to the CLTY, the CITY agrees to convert COUNTY plan designations to CITY plan -- , designations_ which most closely approximate the density, use provisions and standards of COUNTY designations. Furthermore, the CITY agrees to maintain this designation for one year after the effective date of annexation unless both the CITY and COUNTY Planning Directors agree at the time of annexation that the COUNTY designation is outdated and should be amended before the one year- period is over. e. Should any land within the Area of Interest be annexed to the CITY, the area shall continue to be considered as part of the COUNTY Urban Planning Area for the purpose of calculating county-wide new dwelling unit mix and density as required by OAR 660-07--030 and 660--07--035. This provision shall apply until the CITY and COUNTY plans have been acknowledged by t.ho Land Conservation and Development Commission. The City has not required annexation of the 2.8.94 acres under consideration as a condition to the provision of City services. The annexation proposal does riot create an island. The 28.94 acre annexation proposal under consideration was at the request of the individual property owners. No non-consenting property owners are included. The Planning Staff proposes land use and zoning designations for the property which most closely approximate the county designations: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council to assign zoning and land use designations to the property being considered for annexation as follows: A request by the City of Tigard to assign Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to property to be annexed to the City as follows: Tax Map/Tax- Lot Existing Zoning/Comp. Plan Design. Proposed 1S1 35AC 3700 Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density 1S1 35AC 4400 Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density 1S1 35AC 3800 Residential-5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density 1S1 35AC 2800 Office Commercial' CP Com, Professional 1S1 35AC 101 Office Commercial CP Com. Professional 1S1 35AD 1400 Office Commercial CP Cam. Professional S Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density <' 1S1 35AD 1200 Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density 1S1 35AD 1300 Residential 5 units/acre R-4.5 Low Density Also, a recommendation to assign the significant wetlands overlay designation within the 100 year, floodplain on the fallowing properties: Tax Map ISI 35AC Lots 3700, 4400, 3800, 2800, 101; and Tax Map 1S1 35AB Lots 1200, 1300 and 1400. The exact location shall be determined by a ` field survey prior to development. (EAN:cz/1565P) r' a r • �i �F 1 I = `- ' 10 f .. n r'• i 3nN3Ar. so ' I i ► * A • -�. rums � f '\ cc' s i \ e _ ` !a � � •�'� .dry �� ` \ • �� �— 0 't `f ay 3i c' , ® MMw • •� WI „r` �qq'"'� �: �1!R Parr■r�o'�� � ' ' x ti ."` - ::iu:• ;tpis Ilk � �Ih'1'�.�! w■■.H_ii SMS owns Is uuu• •wi. �: s:a'�.. '.i.—i a■�111 C�� �E •... ;,. �: ,,; •is � •r� ...NII �w�- �,-, • �_ _ �■I t 1�i. � mat. ``.' _it� _-�LWT�, r �•�` r����r� 1■al• �. CtM�r •u w,1��S a���`II NI 1�u.■ teA1MIHr�! I i�Ul/ '1y 4 - i �������.,����.•.•�. gl.� by h Sw a�'tsi8r �.',o� ` i.J�•t I �1� og m 11 �`�.� � ■i :�� {� > ! M1,1 _of i 1 , �e �Sl ze �c �eee MA P I In I l LL L LI 1✓ 1JLL 1,L . L ) !v ! o Anpnda I r11i11ti91r1111�e11l11s i eil�llr�111111/i 111111 I lli�ljl i T)7]fT�(filtfllI'11i_P.11 C I(T12- NOTE: it 1..11 I--f ll1i1li 111 all III[IIC {tl 111a111111Iir T 6 I +i I r r e i rlf 1I 1 I 1 f!J0r r e 1 I l I i I l 1 l rlr I111!rll I s t1! TII DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN 'I ` THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - _- DRAWING. •__-- - ---- _ _ ___ __ __ _ - . OE 62 8? --GZ 82 SZ bZ EZ ZZ IZ OZ 6t 8! LI �-91- SPbl EI Z1- --IIank swiwR6wr�wHlmriHHlasgr�sweleswirtroly �1_demieen �±� n(sra�tl ecce IeH IIS e�ul�wdJ� ' LB- 7 1 2 _ , w 'f balar. are! I � ® t PROGRESS OWNS Com' _ AREA OF SPECIAL CONCERN ?he •`1 - ,Zeas desiQna ,v lal m the Cmmsorty Plan L which leave specific design elements within the plan text addrevsim m L'r mZ,'.pedal­­d.,.:t tee 1.1! PIA, -' - NOTE:A.S.C.4 HAS BEEN DELETED COlrh r BY a4-109M MAY 23, 1984 Meta CRY O AVERTono5. - SUBAREA 4 L— -J — PFAFFLE Toc' _ a f WA HINGTON _F \—N I I H,I I Thol al i J _ pia',. i Tho �II de`�` F� 3 S T GcRv of des: PORTLAND pi's c�+ :t V ... ql-?A If > _ I r e� 14 f r Y 7 (CITY OF TIGARD •`1� T. VICINITY MAP _,� i SII (lilil Ill�li! lil L!I I!I rll Its I[7 LII IP r m m I!1 !� l R 7! I i 1 1 I i .I i 1 1 i r ..I I I i � L i i t T I lil�rll Ip�ll1 olLitilllil'IiL�ryl!>II � �..,.> NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED 2 3 4 __. _ rJ' 6 7 8 9 0 i! i2- DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - — - - DRAWING. OE 6z Bz GZ 8Z SZ Oz Ez zz iz oz sr ei—ai si Sf 4i Ei Z�_-._'i of 6 a_ `__9___ S b -_ e._ _z I— d11�1111l11111111111111�111111HIIHII�III�Innl�{ - a WUf1iW 17 ARC i 91990 _ —7 a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 26, 1985 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: August 2, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: _None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 7-85 ~ Red Rock Creek/Villa Ridge Ravine PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Ann Newton REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: YV\ CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Mrs. Geraldine Ball requested that the Planning Commission review Volume I, the Resource Document of the Comprehensive Plan where it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge_Ravine. A copy of the information presented to the Planning Commission by Mrs. Ball is attached. Mrs. Ball is primarily concerned about the reference in Volume I of the Plan to the origination of Red Rock Creek and the fact that the Villa Ridge ravine is not mentioned under the section of the Plan which discusses waterways. A copy of Staff's memo to the Planning Commission responding to Mrs. Ball's concerns is attached. After the public hearing on July 9, 1985, the Planning Commission voted to recommend to City Council that at the next comprehensive plan update the language in Volume I as follows: "Red Rock Creek — located West of I-5, the fourth largest tributary of Fanno Creek, is fed from drainage southeasterly." ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Amend the plan by Ordinance at this time. 2. Retain the existing language. 3. Support the Planning Commission recommendation and amend the plan at the plan review stage. SUGGESTED ACTION Support the Planning Commission recommendation and review the plan language Y ' during the next Comprehensive Plan Review. L ' (EAN:bs/1692P) k ITEM 5.1 July 9, 1985 MEMORANDUM CITY -OF TIGARD. OREGON July 2, 1985 TO Planning Commission FROM: Elizabeth Newton, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CPA 7-85 Mrs, Geraldine Ball has requested that the Planning Commission review Volume I, the Resource Document of the Comprehensive Plan where it pertains to Red Rock Creek .and the Villa Ridge he �loodelainMrs, and W tlandsalMap as uittpertainsthe ta Planning Commission review t P of the information Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge ravine. A copy submitted by Mrs. Ball is attached. The Planning Staff has reviewed the information submitted with the City Engineer. The City Engineer has the following comments: " . .Red Rock Creek has its origin on the northwest side of Mt. Sylvania. It proceeds westerly parallel to Hwy. 99W across I-S, through the Villa Ridge the ravine, across _SW 72nd into Crystal Lake, across Hwy. 217, Hunziker, cal railroad tracks and into Fanno Creek. ThecontourMaps whip illustratee clear. i the names are subject to individual interpretation." City Engineer's comments are attached. LCDC Goal #5 reads in part as follows: ."To conserve open space and protect natural and scenic resources. . . The location, quality and quantity of the following resources shall be inventoried: g, Water areas, wetlands, watersheds and groundwater resources;" nt of Red Rock Creek is discussed eon Tigard's Comprehensive Plan. R dgRock5 CreekV is mco taineds ource w thin ocumtheeVilla Ridge ravine. This section of the Resource Document deals with water courses within the Tigard Planning area. The Villa Ridge ravine is not a watercourse nor is it a tributary of Fanner Creek. Red Rock Creek is a tributary of Fanno Creek is not a watercourse, Since the Villa Ridge Ravine it is not necessary to Volume I of the Comprehensive Plan. The describe it on page I-58 of information made available to City staff indicates that Red Rock Creek does i originate on Mt. Sylvania. RECOMMENDATION: Staff 'recommends that no amendments be made to Volume I - Resource Document or the` Floodplain and Wetlands Map relative to the Villa Ridge Ravine and Red Rock Creek. (EAN:pml1562P) �e Planning Commission Meeting July 9s 1985 City of Tigard Item 5.1 { Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commissions my name is Geraldine Ball, 11515 S. w. gist Avenue and I an appearing before you tonight as a resident who has lived in Tigard for almost 30 years. First, I wankto say that the Villa Ridge Ravine and Red Rock Creek are not near DJB, Inc. or or property. I am appearing before you because I do not feel it is fair to the people who have lived in Tigard, are living in Tigard now, or who will live in Tigard in the future to have incorrect information in the Resource Document in regard to Red Rock Creek. On May 7, 1985 you had the Villa Ridge Ravine and Red Rock Creek on your agenda and at that time I asked that you consider adding the Villa Ridge Ravine to the Resource Document and changing the originating spot of Red Rock Creek to S. W. 72nd instead of on Mt. Sylvania. When I picked up a copy of the document submitted to you for tonight's meeting, my May 7, 1985 request was not included and instead what I'submitted to you on March 5, 1985 was included, which might lead you to believe that the Villa Ridge Ravine and Red Rook Creek ware near our property....but THEY ARE NOT. I have therefore handed you a'copy of the MAY 7, 1985 report." First, a little bit of history. 72nd Avenue used to be called Red Rook Road. There was a Red Rook Dairy and consequently the creek which started near Red Rock Road was called Red Rook Creek by the natives. There was a huge RSD ROCK hence the name Red Rock, The RED ROCK was near Red Rock Road which is now 72nd Avenue and t- not up on Mt. Sylvania. When I learned last Friday that the City insists on keeping in the Resource Document that Red Rock Creek starts on Mt. Sylvania I decided I would have to have more than the word of the old-timers that Red Rock Creek starts near S. W. 72nd.... so I submit to you a portion of a 1964 Metzger Atlas reap published before the completion of I-5 and you will note the creek is marked as "DITCH". There is no showing of water to the north as this was prior to the completion of I-5 and no doubt the drainage water just seeped into the ground rather than making a creek. Then I needed to find a map showing the water starting in Multnomah County coming through the Villa Ridge Ravine. I found said map in the Environmental Impact State- ment for the North Tigard--South Tigard road construction which is presently in p=ogress. You will note it shows it as an unnamed tributary to Fanno Creek and on Page VII -2 it sags to quote "Only one unnamed intermittent stream (directly entering Fenno Creek) actually crosses the proposed corridor (see Figure VII - 2) it occupies a steep, well vegetated canyon and passes mender the existing highway I-5 at Station 421, via a 30 inch, 440 foot concrete pipe culvert." I have submitted to you a map Figure VI-1 showing where the station is and also I have handed you a map Figure VII - 2 which shows the sampling stations and if you line up Barbur Blvd. (99W) and 72nd on this map with Pacific Hwy (99W) and Red Hook Road on 1964 Metzger map you will find that the Sampling No. 5 near 72nd Ave is in exactly the location that the old-timers told me Red Rock Creek started as referred to in the information supplied you on Mayr 7, 1985. This is in the dip between S. W. Pacific Highway and Baylor. Ylanrung t;p�1a81Un rledtl[� Ya�c c �uiy �, '�"� It is possible that Red Rock Creek which is marked "Ditch" on the Metzger 1964 S&P Mas never registered and the natives just called it Red Rock Creek because it started near Red Rook Road and the DIG RFD ROCK and this would then account for it along with the water created in the c;En Fo$ or ravine by the 1964-65 construction of I-5 and 99W being referred to in the N. Tigard- S. Tigard Environmental Impact Statement as "Unnamed tributary to Fanno Creek".- As a point of information I would like to know what kind of map the one with numbers is and what do the numbers stand for. Also what is the dark area along I-�5 in the area of the Interchange? I again ask you to seriously consider the addition of Villa Ridge Ravine to the Resource Document and changing the location of Red Rock Creek from Mt. Sylvania to S. W. 72nd. The Villa Ridge Ravine area is on your Flood Plain map but it is not listed as a ravine or oanyon in the Resource Document. Please make tide, Mkp Chapters VI, VTI and VIII of N. Tigard - S. Tigard Environmental Impact Statement attached hereto, mw May 70 1985 to you, the 1964 Metzger Atlaa map showing the Red Rock Creek 2 and a of the soperate reaps of Figures VI - 1 and VII - 2, and pages N. Tigard- S. Tigard Environmental Impact Statement part of the City of Tigard record and Resource Document record that lists the names of Ravines and Creeks. It wouldn't be necessary to change the map if it agrees with the Metzger map and' Rnvironmental Impact Statement Map Figure VII - 2,as I don't believe names are always listed. a. .:cri♦ ._. a.X!. : wr-�,.n._,ra..,•.:o- .a: a i.-- mid- in nm i� ii• � c1�Cr .v u.r a,.�. �� t��t F mom` L M .JIM .. . [Oiwn '. icC�:c..i�,-r�.�io a F� L Lid :rr. WIN r • ZA, lie 13111 1 ..m . tet" " raAl t ua.w. 1.,' ..�IRJR= ® "r� e"©fie F:ajM WIN ow-m- �Y7. �.ryy•�.y��WON 44 will■"1���.tt. �� �•rn�{uM■a.ce wo �� I. :il!! ■�►S! �a� it fi�i'll'■��rt t::�� u.u..• 1{Y.L`Y� .w-`,n .�_i:.rn,�frc. � �� ' ...�7 1 ,i 1. Y 14. , t'1�:1 �Q�'� ! •Ea 1A�0 OSE. t�'� O �� � 1 Rill D EI_ O Pint, MOM Wall i ®IMS 17■].1�{,ttggg���'�. r�i IMAM all ly .w. N.TIGARO INTERCHANGE C BtVO � v „p 1 4 3 PORTLAND MT. SYLVANIA PLAYA COMMUNITY S SOUTHWEST COLLEGE ..IUI._. HAIkES R0. •• / BAYLORTp W: 650 $OUTHVI W ST. i`gA 600 O DOUG AS IOR U; +s0 SOUTHWOO PARK I 's0 HAMPTON ST. r c OFFICE I .moi COMMERCIAL �'"'' Figur! VII-2 TOPOGRAPHIC ISOPLETHS AND AQUATIC FEATURES S.TIGARD F'Gy yyt� INTERCHANGE AND SAMPLING STATIONS e q`C79 3 thru 7 kq�f W4 OEACOl ! o -.60 r stn 'BEGINNING OF PROJECT STA.385+00 vh k T�CgftQ!�T fRCHA 1vGc odd '� may' gwo. v Z Z s �pp,6J?• �f - C pQ� 4?O TRUCK LANE CHANGE IN STA ) REFERENCE POINTSf . 4 RANDOM FILL b PO uj PORTLAND PLAZA 2 COMMUNITY 9 SOUTHWEST r COLLEGE GP' > ,LJ HAINES R40 D. NORTH BAYLOR OT kuji .. �. SOUTNVI W ST. Fq wlul.aNQMAw co. _ CNpNG� DOUGLAS 1DR. CLACKAMAS CO. �Opa,N,�EQ > 60 u 1 ' / D END OF PROJECT SOUTHWOOD PARK ` ^ STA 11+00 70 e HAMPTON ST. tl OFFICE I . COMMERCIAL Gl:•' 9` �+A�F�Q TEFtCHANGE 9J'c99 _ r®Igo f W.4y CONST.) r/ ;. Figure YI.1 SCHEMATIC MAP Rt>:R •1�. .�, SCALE 1 ouD• VII-2 Existing Environment Hydrology The project corridor crosses the west slope of Mt. Sylvania, which is drained by a network of tributaries to the Tualatin River. Several first and second order streams including Ash Creek, Ball Creek, Carter Creek, and a number of unnamed tributaries drain into a larger downslope tributary called Fanno Creek, which enters the Tualatin River at R.M. 9.4. The Fanno Creek watershed, which occupies 32.5 square miles (20,800 acres), is shown in Figure VII-1. Fanno Creek, as well as the Tualatin River itself, has experienced an alteration of its hydrologic characteristics in recent years as the watershed has been transformed from a predominantly rural/suburban area to an urban/light industrial one. Surface water runoff has greatly increased as the area had developed, since ground_surface which normally allows rain waters to infiltrate into it has been covered with impermeable surfaces such as roads and houses. Therefore, much water which formerly percolated into the ground to join the local or regional water table now is conducted via roads, ditches, sewers, etc. directly to surface drainages, increasing peak storm flows. Further contributing to an increase in storm flows is fill and development on the flood plain, which results in a decrease in flood storage area and an alteration of flood flows. Flood flows in the Fanno Creek system, typical of small streams draining urban areas, are characterized by fast rises immediately after heavy rains and crest, shortly after rainfall ceases (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1969). Only one unnamed intermittent stream (directly entering Fanno Creek) actually crosses the proposed corridor (see Figure VII-2). It occupies a steep, well-vegetated canyon and passes under the existing highway (I-5) at Station VII-3 421, via a 30-inch, 440-foot concrete pipe culvert. Near the northern terminus of the project, a tributary to Ash Creek originates from springs now located under the freeway at Station 386 and flows westerly into Ash Creek. Ball Creek and Carter Creek, both extensively altered by channelization and culvertization, cross I-5 south of the southern terminus of the project at South Tigard Inter- change. A general discussion of the water quality and aquatic biota in lower' Fanno Creek and associated tributaries (some of which fall outside the immediate ! study area) will follow. This discussion will establish the aquatic "context" of the area, upon which the alterations caused by this project will be super- j imposed.' In this way, the relative magnitude of those alterations will be more clearly demonstrated. Water QuaIit Water quality of these streams has deteriorated along with the increase in 'the rate of development. Department of Environmental Quality records indicate that sewage contamination in Fanno Creek is a continuing problem, with fecal coliform levels hovering at or above (up to 2.5 times--see Table VII-1) the DEQ standard of an MPN of 240 per 100 ml (Special Water Quality Standards for the Tualatin River Basin, June, 1974). From the little data available, however, it appears that conditions have improved within the past five years; one low water ` sample taken from Fanno Creek on September 16, 1969, indicated fecal coliform levels of 24,000 per 100 ml, which is 100 times the standard. Elevated fecal coliform levels are accompanied by low dissolved oxygen concentrations (those on record when associated with high fecal coliform are all well below the 90-95% saturation levels required by DEQ for this river basin), and by very high nutrient levels (nitrates, phosphates, ammonia). Conditions have apparently gradually improved as sewage treatment plants are installed and treatment methods upgraded. Planznin4; Commission Meeting May 7, 1965 City of Tigard Mr. Chairman and Me. bers of the Commission: My name is Geraldine Ball and-I ram representing DdB,Inc. and myself, G. L. Ball. From the looks of theagendaof your meeting it looks like it could be a short one, and if such is the case, it is possible I may not get there in time to personally appear before you. 1. AMBITI0N I hope you will seriously consider adding Ville Ridge Ravine to your resource•document. This is one of the largest tributaries to Fanno Creek yet it was not mentioned in the Resource Document. It starts in Multnomah County and runs between Barbur and Villa Ridge Road and Atlanta and Baylor on the Tigard side as you will see on the 1980 and 1984 ODOT maps. 2. COR_U4TION The Resource Document states that Red hock Creek starts on 14t. Sylvania. Red Rock Creek actually starts near 72ndx==*rdix5xx In checking with the old-timers I am told it starts inxthuxiic near the dip in the road between Villa Ridge Road and Baylor. This probably means that the Villa Ridge Ravine water and the Red Rock Creek water join together to now into Fanno Creek. x> CITY OF IGARD XA? The City of Tigard map shows the Villa Ridge Ravine starting on S. W. 66th which is not correct as it should have a line on the 'cast Side of I-5 as they have done witch Ball Creek which lies south of the Triangle. I notice a water indication at 72nd in the vicinity of Dartmouth. This would be the man--made creek which comes across I-5 in a culvert until it reaches Pollock'a Tax Lot 6600, Map 1 S 1 36 DD and then crosses S. W. 69th at the corner of G.L. Ball property T. L. 6300, Map 1 S 1 36 DD and goes under the road onto Pollock'a property T. L. 7600 and goes on down the hill. This is to be changed when the City of Tigard changes over to the culvert which runs just south of The remaining portion of T. L. 6500, 14ap i S 1 36 DD and on down the hill. Tk A portion of the culvert was broken in con- struction just south of the 100 plus year old oak so part of the water will not go in the culvert. Alsc a breakage in the culv­:.' that cores to join this culvert was not properly connected so some of that water iscoming under the culvert which is located just to the north of T. L. 2800, Map 2 S 1 1 AA, Vasey property. including maps Y .<c 4 C `fit l•.t '� 'Y��/�.j I ASK THAT' ALL OF i•iIS/BE H,,DE P;PT OF T`dE CITY OF TItt,:t`1D Y.'»_CO!tD - and I hope you will make a. motion to take care of the addition of the Villa Ridge Zavine and the correction of location of Red Rock Creek. If I shouldn't be around this area in the years to come I felt it might be advantageous to the City to have this additional infoization. x �tx�lkxxx3�a#cxxesekxaeirot�a�3c3ex�cx�ix�tx�taex3�icxzzscxl�txxicx3ex�exs Ttxxxdxpapukztixxxanxthri xxA924xxzpx You may want to ask tra- tp i POpulat mtr caned on the 1984 map. Tne 19 0 map shows: it at14, �s� "� r � D&,081tl77&17t of L 817d Crrservatrc�r� ar�d Deve%pinent VICTOR" " 1175 COURT STREET N.E.,SALEM, OREGON 97310 PHONE(503)378-4926 April 9, 1985 acs. Geraldine Ball 11515 S.W. 91st Ave. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mrs. Ball: I have spoken with Liz Newton at the City of Tigard since your appearance before the Commission in March. It is my, understanding t at the City plans to review your inform- ation ,about Villa Ridge Ravine and Red Rock Creek. They will make needed changesaccording to post-acknowledgment procedures. Thank you for bringing these matters to our attention. Sincerely, ,,Jame R. Sitzman Meld Representative JS:LS Portland Field Office-320 S.W.Stark. Rm. 530-Portland.Oregon 97204-(503)229-60W =Jf: ?• ~ uY....nf.a "'•"L'�n�d w. ji ,�l�JU�I`� ..r� ULJ OL dz_'Ll V;:=�_ it-it Li Lk n alYt+r trwi ` �.. .70 Til Us �Z� \ _t. Q e+wucf Yr �.t.❑ f1•w a i Ir •K�I�[II .• w T+ �Y )nV.`r.o•e a. .r t i S�/'''�\ 'nom`_.�`�-- � ritYtYM ��' J{�J a 11 �� �� � •�'�• �\r� = w1 — —_.�_Y� �YT.Mr��rrMyy��rr....•.//•• i i 1 �.,'��� • Mf. VANe a r 1 AL • , 1 •� � f• •�� (w� 1 = / larl• 4W1 ! - TIGARD rrat M.N ff0 t, rr % ..-,.a _� _ �1 1 `�w✓ +"• • 91 swwa yy a�a 3 �'� tra.sr �•. t1i �' 1 P as •R� � ,•tlrtna n j � fr�,�•tr,�� Y. ,ti +01 t�" ;� caw-•'=.a. ;----------- � Cr. t r'; $ t _.tae ! "" t�,►, 1 ar Y 1 Yr f: w•a i. J tw.w.n r Ltr, ,1 +... '' •(�� � � ar .r talo �._S R.. � �. 40 PO 7 +.. - ••.. .. . .r..•....•. IA✓ `� Til �� .•• {(j` `....!.�aSf...'t "�C'� '•".wS; .t.' .L.•. .«5:�..,.r.:.«F Yru.+r.wrNR•..�.... UUPJ �L! Lj fix 1Lr ir •Mull ^ i � ��.. �'"'.. � ..r.. � � 1.��.•� alt 'C�JLJ�� �\,' if •• � {��� K.• J • ,� 1 � / �— �f ��. � i x' w 7W $ •4!p . Kr ii .aw•r •� p /.h. •. :� � -{{ `�.. j ,y04 {p tj[ •Y VVV �' JR o Ity IF— L KY . , ITEM 5.1 July 9, 1985 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Planning Commission July 2, 1985 FROM: Elizabeth Newton, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CPA 7-85 Mrs. Geraldine Ball has requested ,that the Planning Commission review Volume I. the Resource Document of the Comprehensive Plan where it pertains, to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge ravine. Mrs. Ball has also requested that the Planning Commission review the Floodplain and Wetlands Map as it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge ravine. A ropy of the information submitted by Mrs. Ball is attached. The Planning Staff has reviewed the information submitted with the City Engineer. The City,Engineer has the following comments: ". . .Red Rock Creek has its origin on the northwest side of Mt. Sylvania. It proceeds westerly parallel to Hwy. 99W across I-5. through the Villa Ridge ravine, across SW 72nd into Crystal Lake, across Hwy. 217, Hunziker, the railroad tracks and into Fanno Creek. The contours are clear. Geographical names arra subject to individual interpretation. Maps_ which illustrate the r' City Engineer's comments are attached. LCOC Goal #5 reads in part as follows: ."To conserve open space and protect natural and scenic resources. . . The location, quality and quantity of the following resources shall be inventoried: g. Water areas, wetlands, watersheds and groundwater resources;" Red Rock Creek is discussed on page I-50 of Volume I - Resource Document of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan. Red Rock Creek is contained within the Villa Ridge ravine. This section of the Resource Document deals with water courses within the Tigard Planning area. The Villa Ridge ravine is not a watercourse nor is it a tributary of Fanno Creek. Red Rock Creek is a tributary of Fanno Creek Since the Villa Ridge Ravine is not a watercourse, it is not necessary to describe it on page I-50 of Volume I of the Comprehensive Plan. The information made available to City staff indicates that Red Rock Creek does originate on Mt. Sylvania. RECOMMENDATION- Staff ECO MENDATIONStaff recommends that no amendments be made to -olume I - Resource Document or the Floodplain and Wetlands Map relative to the Villa Ridge Ravine and Red Rock Creek. (EANpm11562P) I'LaN2�iIAG CLriMI��IOr CITY uF T1614tli 1985 MIM IM 5.2 - CPA 3G-64 Mr. President anc Membere of the Comaiasiont try nese* in Geraldine Ball and I am representing LJb, Inc. and aWse.lf, L. L. ball. As you will remeaber, you discussed CPA 34-84 before on January 8, 1985. At the time of the discussion of Item 3.4.1 I Basked a question but I certairay did not saW that I telt that there was no need fora Field Survey, as reported in the minutes. To be certain of what I s.,id I went down to the City of Tigard and made a transcript of that portion of the ?lanning Commission meeting - and it went like this. Geraldine Rall speakingr "The question I have is now with this map you are taking off the wetland map then do you need a field survey in addition? Is that what you mean?" Lisa NewdMepeakingr orto, what the policy will mean is that now if they change the policy - if you bawd an urea of land that resets the definition of wetland you could still be subject to the policies that apply to wetland but you only need a field survey if there is a question," Geraldine Ball ay*&Xingo "I see' that's the point. I didn't know if you ■sent all the areas vane goinb to have a field surmVW„" Suis Newton speaking* "No$ as a general rule if there is a question the boundary of wetlands will be detozained by a field surrey. Obviously some areas are not wetl ands.b Geraldine ,Ball speakinaa "I*& intsz4wted booms* I's chairman of NPO r4 and we are ®Dina to harm a meeting ftsorrow night and I want to know at least part of what "a talking about." pl*"* make notatien Le 'the simtes Of this seating of March %A"5 1965 to vbOw the oorrestion to aimaates of Jan. 6, 1965. Iftear reoeiving a OOpy of rasp of the Triangle frac W&ahin6tan County on February 191, 1985, I realise how venue important held Survers are, especially in view of the fast tb&t the nor *bows the vstedr fzvm the Tills, biidg* Ravine, one of Tigard's largest tribstarise to rate Croak being diverted onto S. V. 66th. I trust the City of Tiaabrd gill require • field survey in the Vills, didgs Ravine arse, before azW building or road oonstrmstion is allorsd and also that they will see that the water stayss in its natural d rainagooW as shown OR the 1980 OLOt usp, copy of which I an ,Riving YOU t0- night* ftis is Isportant so as to not disturb the wildlife habitat in the area as well as pswenting the water ending up on private propene, both of which I belie" are against the law. I an also submitting borewitb a copy or may obtained from Washin6ton County on reb, 19, 1985 troa whioh I obtained my information. Said map does not properly wow Vacated S, 1e,, Dartmouth and V&oated b. W. 67th, motet of which has been lessod to the Ford d*sl*rship since 1970. To verify the street Vacation copy of gash. County S i a 67-;769 Aset. Attorney Coneral, Jack Sollis'a letter of June 29, 19629 along with uap, and Circuit Court Case 42.3" are hervAth mbaitted, We ask that all these dommentps along with the Oregon Leet, of Transportation 1980 map and the asp ob- tsised tkiosa Washington County an ?*b, 19, 19859 %* sad* part of tonight•s Planning Commission PuUio bearing on Ites 5,2 CosprehensiVa Plan ame0ftstat 30-84. Also I vast to point Out that the information regardin6 Red hook Creek reported on Pare I 56 of Coaaprehensive plan is inaorreot. Red Rook Creek starts on S. W. 72nd ne►t on Mt. M►lwania. When I called on se Corps of Engineers in 1962 they► verified this lnforgation as well as the location of Vill* Ridge Ravine and Ball Creek as the ass* as sibmin on the 1980 ODOT sap. Ball Crook is not in the Triangle but Villa Ridge Ravine is and is just south of CaCos, the note1, PGE, Ch*vmu Sation, UiHm' *to' all of whicZ are located on Highvgr "W, Plow* rnttke this and all attscbs►snts part of tonight's hearing and the City of Tuand. TRANSCRIPT FROM MINUTES OF PLANNING C.rHM13SION Jan. 8, 1985 as transcribed from tape at City Hall by Geraldine L. Ball .' Liz Newton opeakin. 3.4.1 We tali: about designating the following areas of significant envirorraental concern and we want to say City shill designate by definition not by location the following as areas of significant environmental concern and t},en list....etc. so that gets back to map for designated areas by, location...then tape cannot be understood and then it 6o es onto Geraldine L. Ball speaking The question I have is now with this map you are taking off the wetlands nap then do you heed a field surv3W in addition. Is that what you mean? Liz Newton speaking: No What the policy will mean is that now if they change the policy. If you have an area of land th._t meets the definition of wetland you could still be subject to the ,policies that apply to wetland but you only need a field survey if there is a question. Geraldine L. Ball speaking I see, that's the point. I didn't know if you meant all the areas were goin6 to have a arcfield survey. Liz Newton No, as a. general rule if there is a question he boundary of wetlands will be determined by a field survey. Obviously, some areas are not wetlands. ......I'm interested because I'm chairman of NPO #4 and we are going to have a +. meeting tomorrow night and I want to know ax at least part of what I'm talking about. F TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING — JULY 9, 1985 �1. President Moen called the meeting to order•. at 7435 P.M. . The meeting was held at ,the Tigard School District Building Conference Room 13137 SW Pacific Highway. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Owens, Butler, Peterson, Campbell, Fyre, Bergmann, and Leverett. Absent: Commission Vanderwood. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES o President Moen noted two typographical errors. # Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to approve the minutes with corrections. Motion carried by majority of Commissioner present. Commissioners Fyre and Bergmann abstained. 4. COMMISSION COMMUNICATION a Senior Planner Newton stated that Item 5.3; an annexation request by Russell Kruegear, would be set over to -the August 6th' Planning Commission Hearing. o Commissioner Owens commented she had stopped at Elmer's Pancake house and had talked with these about their denial and options for using temporary signs, S. PUBLIC` HEARIRGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 7-85 CITY OF TIGARD Review of Volume I — Resource Document where it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge Ravine. Also. a review of the Tigard Flood plain and Wetlands Map as it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge Ravine. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for denial. She stated that Frank Currie, the City Engineer was available for any questions. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Mrs. Geraldine Ball, 11515 SW 918t, submitted and read into the record a letter (with saps) supporting changes to Volume I of the Comprehensive Plan. o Lou Christen, 17895 SW Shasta, Tualatin, stated that Red Rock Creek had never originated beyond I-5. It originated close to the OEA property. He supported changing the document to reflect that Red Rock Creek originates on the west side of I-S. PLANNTNO COMMISSION MINUTES July 9. 1985 Page 1 o, Discussion followed regarding where Red Rock Creek originated. khat change was being proposed to the plan. The difference between a . waterway and a ravine, and why staff was recommending denial of any i change. PUBLIC NEARING CLOSED: o Consensus of the Commission was that the drainage for Red Rock Creek does originate on Mt. Sylvania, even though Red Rock Creek does not exist on the east side of I-5. Also Villa Ridge Ravine is not a waterway and should not be listed on Page 58 (Volume I) of the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Fyre moved, and Commissioner Owens seconded to recommend that the next time the Comprehensive Plan is updated to modify the plan to state that "Red Rock Creek located west of I-5, the fourth largest tributary of Fanno Creek, is fed from drainage flowing southeasterly. . . . .". Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present: 5,2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 2-85 ZC 8-85 DAVIS NPO N 4 A request to assign Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to property to be annexed to the City of Tigard. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the history explaining that City Council had approved the annexation. Now the Commission needs to assign Y- Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to the property being annexed, PUBLIC TESTIMONY Mrs. Geraldine Ball, 11515 SW 91st, representing NPO 0 4, supported staff's recommendation as being most like the County's zoning. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 5 o Discussion followed regarding designating the property wetlands and why the lot number where different from the previous proposal. * Commissioner Bergmann moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward CP 8-85 to City Council recommending approval of staff's recommendation. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner's present. 5.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-85, ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 11-85 RUSSELL KRUEGER (request to ,annex 23.26 acre to Tigard) NPO M 7 Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to set CPA 9-85 and ZCA 11-85 over to the August 6. 1985. Planning Commissioner hearing. 5.4 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 10-85 SCROLLS LEST BUILDING INC. NPO 0 7 Request to annex 1.11 acre parcel into the City of Tigard. Also, A request to change the zoning on the property from Washington County MA 1 to City of Tigard IP. Located: 9730 SW Cascade Blvd. (WCrM 181 2700 lot r • 100). PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 9, 1995 Page 2 T'IGARD CITY CO U XIL ' September 4, 1985 � L - ITM 13 CPA 7-85 . Mayor and Councilors: Mr. ar � ��y'/��'_" My name ire, Geraldine Ball, 11515 S. W. 91st Avenue, and I am appearing before you tonight as a resident who has lived in Tigard for almost 30 years. First, 'I want to say that the Villa Ridge Ravine and Red Rock Creek aro INLT NEAR ATB. INC, . OR MY PROPERTY. I am appearing before you because I feel it is only fair to the people who have lived in Tigard, are living in Tigard now or who will live in Tigard is the future to ,have the correct information in the Resource Document in regard to Red Rock Creek. First, I want to be sure that all of you know the area of villa Ridge Ravine and Red Rock Creek. I feel certain Mayor Cook does as he was pharmacist for Motes before Red Rock Road was changed to 72nd Avenue and probably Councilor Edwards does since his organisation patrolled the area. For the benefit of all concerned Villa Ridge Ravine on the north end is located off 991 just south of Wer Lee Motel, Cocos, the new Seafood Restaurant (formerly Plank- bouss)' IIi-fiat and Chevron Station and the businesses on Villa Ridge Road. On the south border it is just north of Southwest Plaza (also known as Oregon Education Assn) in other words OEA. The area is shown on Wash. County map 1 S 1 36 DA. I agree with what Frank Currie said at the Planning Commission meeting on July 9• 1985 and that is Villa Ridge Ravine "is a geographical feature. The creek (meaning Sed Rock Creek) is the drainageway and it tuna throiUjh+li l*i6RAne." For that reason I ask that you consider including Resource oument volume I - Appendix;I under Identified Resources which staxt on Page I-96. This is where the 108113 Ravine is listed and it is a smaller ravine than the Villa Ridge Ravine. Now in regard to REV? ROCK CREEK. ?iret, a little bit of history. 72nd Avenue used to be called hied Rook Road. There was a Red Rook DaizY and there was a huge RED ROCK hence the name Rad Rock. The BIG RED RACK was near Red Rook Road which is now 72nd Avenue and not up on Mt. Sylvania. At the hearing before the Planning Commission Lou Christin, a member of NPO #4 testified and I now quote his "Let me make a statement that our family moved from Portland to Tigard in 1949• If you take the area just beyond 72nd our property 22 acres of it and that Creek (meaning Red Rock) followed the full length of it down to what is now 217. That creek at that time started just in a little area below where Oregon Educe, tion Assn. Building is todowe" Mr. Christin further stated that when they moved out there there was no 1-5 and the little creek started in that area. He further commented that they used to ride their horses in the area and up to Mt. Sylvania but when I-5 was build they filled in some of the area so now there is an area to drain off theme too. The water from the East Side of 1-5 has been flowing into Red Rock Creek on the west mode of 1-5 since the construction of 1-5 in 1964. Figure VII - 2 sap in the Saviromental Impact Statement for the North Tigard Interchange confirms this and you will note it shove it as an unnamed tributary to Fanno Creek. On Page VIZ - 2 its s to quote "Only one unnamed intexzai.ttent stream (directly entering Fanno Creek actually arouses the proposed corridor (see Figure VII -2) it occupies a steep, well vegetated canyon and passes under the existing highway I-5 at Station 4219 via a 30 inch, 440 foot eoncretepips culvert." On Figure VI - 1 you can use the location of this station near Barbur Blvd. and 1-5• TIGARD CITY COUNCIL s geptember 4, 1985 ITHei 13 CPA 7-85 Page 2 (Presented by Geraldine Hall). The August 1964 Metzger map shows Red Rock Road and how the Red Rock Creek ran through the Christin property. The following conversation between Commissioner Pyre and?Rank Currie at the July 9, 1985 Planning Commission meeting confirms what I have been saying and that is what the old-timers have been telling me. Red Rock Creek on the West side of I-5 was there years ago and the drainage from the East side of I-5 into Red Rock Creek came later. N quote.,.. Commissioner Pyre: `kIs there water in that culvert year around coming under I-5?" Frank Currie: "Yes" Commissioner Fyre "Year Round?" Currie "There is now" Commissioner Pyre: "There is now what does that mean -- that there wasn't two years ago" Currie: "Probably there wasn't years ago - not year around - the build up of the area caused run-off" I would assume that before the build-up of the area and the construction of I-5 and the installation of the culvert the water in the area just went into the ground instead of forming a stream. E After much discussion Commissioner Pyre moved to change the wording the next time plan is updated to read and. I quote as copied from the transcript. W "Red Bock Creek located West of I-5 is the 4th largest tributary of Faun+ Creek. It is fed from drainage flowing southwesterly from the Northwest heights of Mt. Sylvania. Everything else - aame", before you tonight Under Item 13 Information Summary/the Planning Commission motion is incorrectly stated. The evox7thing else is "where the drainage divides with Rall Creek on the south is rathsr indeterminate. The lower portion of the stream is a low gradlsnt flood- plain. Few tWdrologic measurements have been made on the stream." To confirm that Red Rook Creek has nothing to do with Ball Creek I refer you to Page VII - 2 and the part underlined which states "Only one unnamed intenaittent stream (directly entering Fanno Creek) actually crosses the proposed corridor (see Figure V'II - 2) it occupies a steep well-vegetated cavyon and passes under the existing highway I-5 at Station 4211, via a 30 inch, 40 foot concrete pipe culvert." Station 421 is near Bswbur Blvd. and 1-5- In regard to hydrologic measurements you will note on Figure VII-2 Wrap there are several - nsmsly Nos. 39 4, and 50 As a point of information you will note from the Map Figure VI-I of EnvironmentkI Impact Statement that they refer to the Interchange near Barbur Blvd. as the N. Tigard,Interchange, the Interchange near Clinton as the Raines Road Interchange and the Interchange near Kruse Way as the S. Tigard Interchange. I hops you as the Council of the City of Tigard will make certain the citizens of Tigard have the correct information in the Resource AOanaaent in regard to Bad Book '- .TIGARD CITY COUNCIL September 4, 1985 ITA'i 93 ; CPA 7-85 Page 3 (Presented by Geraldine Ball) Creek and Villa Ridge Ravine. Please make this, Chapters VY, VII., and VIII of the H. Tigard - S. Tigard EnvirM Rental Impact Statement attached hereto, the separate nape of Figures SPI - 1 and VII 2 and Pages VII 2 and VII --3 of the N. Tigard - S. Tigard Environmental Impact Statement and also the 1964 Metzger Atlas map shoving Red Rock Road and the Red Hock Creek ditch part of the City of Tigard record and Resource Document record that lists the names of Ravines and Creeks, Also males Mash. County map 1 S 1 36 DA part of the record. Thank you. w ME. y� MEN Y. BEGINNING OF PROJECT ISTA 385+04 a3, >� T1GgRo'MrERC�� `` N(;E 1 z'z�w 0P4�J� 3 CpQ 1 �2� TRUCK LANE CHANGE IN STA. REFERENCE POINRANDOM FILL cr- w PORTLAND PLAZA COMMUNITY SOUTHWEST COLLEGE HAINES RQ. 44 P NORTH SAYLOR � I ui V 0 �SOUT�IiViEW ST, g,9 ae �� I�~ 90 MUITNOMAH CO. pNG� DOUGLAS DR. CLACKAMAS CO. c �OpO s a i i 60 i i t J a FEND N ST PROJECT $pUTHWOOD PARK �i 70 w_ HAMPTON ST. OFFICE COMMERCIAL ' i .0 �'` df z �,y�' g,^116PRq 1NTEa Np�R/COiIfsr.) t F4gwt VI•t _ SCHEMATIC MAP ER `'-- ...... ...�..► SCALE 1"-IOW ,I .. r N.TIGARO INTERCHANGE H' d * � t 1 9T'• 30. �$ 4 ' . ► c�n� PORTLAND EST, S YLVANIA PLAZA Li COMMUNITY � B SOUTM7/EST j COLLEGE C"_D S HAINES RO- a a ae. - •,. ,ry SAYLORsw J ~ ' , ftoSOUTHVI W ST. F,q pOUG'`S OR. ^ W I 430 �jOU7►it�00 PARK ftoa HAMPTON SL f OFFICE ' +�� 300 COMMERCIAL ; ��"'' Figure VII-2 TOPOGRAPHIC ISOPLETHS AND AQUATIC FEATURES t TIGARO INTERCHANGE AND SAMPLING STATIONS 3 thru T 'ftO 7 �0 - VII-2 Existin Environment H LLL oqy The project corridor crosses the west slope of Mt. Sylvania, which is drained by a network of tributaries to the Tualatin River. -Several first and second order streams including Ash Creek, Ball Creek, Carter Creek, and a number of unnamed tributaries drain into a larger downslope tributary called Fanno Creek, which enters the Tualatin River at R.M. 9.4. The Fanno Creek watershed, which occupies 32,5 square miles (20,800 acres), is shown in Figure VII-1. Fanno Creek, as well as the Tualatin River itself, has experienced an alteration of its hydrologic characteristics in recent ,rears as the watershed has been transformed from a predominantly rural/suburban area to an urban/light industrial one. Surface water runoff has greatly increased as the area had developed, since ground surface which normally allows rain waters to infiltrate into it has been covered with impermeable surfaces such as roads and houses. Therefore, much water which formerly percolated into the ground to join the local or regional water table now is conducted via roads, ditches, sewers, etc. directly to surface drainages, increasing peak storm flows. Further contributing to an increase in storm flows is fill and development on the flood plain, which results in a decrease in flood storage area and an alteration of flood flows. Flood flows in the Fanno Creek system, typical of small streams draining urban areas, are characterised by fast rises iamediately after heavy rains and crest, shortly after rainfall ceases (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1969). Only one unnamed intermittent streaiq_(directly entering Fanno Creek) actually crosses the se propod corridor (see Figure VII-2). It occupies.a,steep well-vegetated canyon and passes under the existing highway (I-5) at Station a VII-3 y 421, via a 30-inch, 440-foot concrete pipe culvert. Near the northern terminus of the project, _a tributary to Ash Creek originates from springs now located under the freeway at Station 386 and flows westerly into Ash Creek. Ball Creek and .Carter Creek, both extensively altered by channeiixation and culvertization cross I-5 south of the southern terminus of the project at South Tigard Inter- change. nter change. A general discussion of the water quality and aquatic biota ia• lower Fanno Creek and associated tributaries (some of which fall outside the immediate study arga) will follow. This discussion will establish the aquatic "context" of the area, upon which the alterations caused by this project will be super imposed. In this way, the relative magnitude of those alterations will be more clearly demonstrated. Water QualijX Water quality of these streams has deteriorated along with the increase r in the rate of development. Department of Environmental Quality records indicate that sewage contamination in Fanno Creek is a continuing problem, with fecal coliform levels hovering at or above (up to 2.5 times--see Table VII-1) the DEQ standard of an MPN of 240 per 100 ml (Special Water Quality Standards for the Tualatin River Basin, June, 1974). From the little data available, however. it .appears that conditions have improved within the past five years; one low water sample taken from Fanno Creek on September 16, 1969, indicated fecal coliform levels of 24.000 per 100 ml, which is 100 times the standard. Elevated fecal coliform levels are accompanied by low dissolved oxygen concentrations (those on record when associated with high fecal coliform are all well below the 90-95% saturation levels required by DEQ for this river basin), and by very high nutrient levels (nitrates, phosphates, ammonia). Conditions have apparently gradually improved as sewage treatment plants are installed and treatment methods upgraded. _ y d wAr' 83 � lien low a.r o � r ��rr��� �� p IIID �Ii '� 'wR'/�' �7tItL�r■,, ,� SRU Com. tZt i�V�� aoe 06 �� a ac ac k_.4��; ■, 4 .1 91 I��r��R��:C,■ "'.'J��:: 'a�s�°:�4-� GSI: ��Rr,a-. Q!= ymum �` ���l r'�Il�° 1`�{�M�li�'w` y�...•' .0� d fat`7�� � - y,: �; T.:4` .�. i me ri19 a Cri± rdD ;Ilq�■■wbi8r�9Q �o irr Otis {7 NGr1 7 y •�1i14,� vi�3r 7 �f7�ilf�s7i. H►F�:��`� �;� '" ai�' ��00�!���,Qh� [�i�� :ems•o��?� �r f [ 1�� �-• L wt� .'��.Y�ir�.• .�4 VI-1 GEOLOGY Study Approach Several field trips were made to the project to examine its topography, soil and rock types, geologic hazards, potential erosion areas, evidence of ground water, and potential material sources and surplus sites. This was supple mented by discussions with members of the Region l geology staff. Use was also made of prior reports by the Region 1 geology staff detailing core drill records, laboratory soil analysis reports, and base design recommendations. Detail , profiles and cross-section maps from the Location Section, as well as aerial mosaic maps from the Photogrammetric Unit were used. This unit was also checked for the presence of survey monuments in the project. The Location Section likewise supplied the aggregate, cut and fill, and clearing and grubbing data. Both the Hydrology Unit and the Landscape Unit supplied informa- tion on erosion control. Project Alternatives The project essentially consists of the following three alternatives: 1. No-build Widen I-5 Widen I-5 (North Tigard and Haines Rebuild North Tigard Inter- Rebuild North Tigard Road Interchanges remain change, including Truck Interchange, in- as existing) Lane cluding Truck Lane Reconstruct Haines Road Reconstruct Haines Overpass Road Overpass Revise Haines Road Inter- Close Haines Road ';: chane Interchange VI-2 I The above alternatives consist of widening a 1.44 mile segement of { Interstate Highway 5 near Tigard from _four to six lanes, revision and recon- struction of two interchanges, improving alignments, creating a truck lane, and constructing, altering, or obliterating ramps and streets. Upon completion of j the project, I-5 will be completely six-laned between Portland and Salem, the purpose being to more safely accommodate increasing traffic volumes. I No unusual construction problems are anticipated. Existing Environment - Topography The project crosses the western lower slopes of Mt. Sylvania, an extinct volcano rising approximately 975 feet above mean sea level (a.m.s.l.). Elevations on the freeway portion of the project rise from about 250 feet a.m.s.l. at the south end to about 500 feet a.m.s.l. at the north end, making an overall gradient of three percent. The gradient in the north portion, attaining a maximum of 5.8 percent north-easterly from the North Tigard Interchange, is considerably steeper than that in the south portion. The project hill slopes are gentle to moderate except for those of the steep-sided westerly-trending gully draining the area just south of the North Tigard Interchange. The freeway crosses the gully via a fill and conducts the unnamed intermittent stream westward by means of a culvert near Station 422+00. (A station is a survey point established every 100 feet, with smaller Increments designated when needed, as: Station 422+28, which means 42,228 feet from the point of beginning, measured along the centerline.) rJ :J VI-3 ogy Exploratory drilling along the project indicates a very irregular soil zone from 0 to 21 feet or more deep. Underlying this are the relatively thin flows of Boring Lava extruded from nearby Mt. Sylvania during the late Pliocene geologic age. This rock is a massive, blocky, gray porphyritic-(largercrystals within a finer groundmass),olivine basalt that forms the bedrock throughout the project. The rock is weathered locally to depths of 46 feet or more. None of the drill holes, the deepest being 58 feet, are known to have penetrated the lava rock into the underlying sedimentary Troutdale Formation of early Pliocene age, No faults or other geologic structural weaknesses are known to occur in the project area. Geologic Hazards Although no geologic hazards are known to occur in the project area, (( � it is imperative that several wet areas be adequately drained before construction 1 � a proceeds. These areas occur from the north end of the project to about freeway Station 387+00, and in the vicinity of two intermittent streams near Freeway Stations 422+00 and 54+00. Probing of the latter area along Line A in the Haines Road Interchange complex disclosed depths of soft soil 2.5 to 5.0 feet deep. This is thought to be due to saturation rather than to an inherently weak soil. The area is very poorly drained and improving the drainage prior to placing embankment would greatly facilitate construction. The proposed remedial system of drainage culverts and ditches is 1. described in detail in the Hydrology Section of this Draft Environmental Impact '` Statement. _BEGINNING PROdE ' STA.385+00 N. TR I O,NT ERch4NGF Q� * U t9 O B`v0. 2 r d p C PQM 4�0 TRUCK LANE CNGE om-HAS-� IN STA... 1 REFERENCE POINTS - RANDOM FILL "' PORTLAND PLAZA ui COMMUNITY SOUTHWEST -i COLLEGE GP j JUS HAINES RD. Q 40 Q Q�Q� BAYLOR T. JI NORTH ? w m' SOUTHVI'W SL Fq 9 MULTNOMAH CO. GNP�C,E OOUGL`_S ,DR. CLACKAMAS CO. w v 60 �p1N�S�OPd Q 1 s j tp 1 O END OF PRO ECT HWOOD PARK SOUT STA 68+00 \ 70 HAMPTON ST. OFFICE f COMMERCIAL f/ �+A�c�`AOiy GHAi�IGE ! . ` A ROINTEF� S.TIGA 9�y� O WA kRUS F Y J CONST.) - Figure VI-1 i CARTgR SCHEMATIC MAP '_��... SCALE 1••-1060' r . VI-4 ,1 Planned 2:1 slopes (cut two feet horizontal to one foot vertical) will be satisfactory throughout the project with the exception of the cut section at the North Tigard Interchange where pre-splitting (a method of blasting in which both vertical and horizontal shots are made in close sequence) on 1/4:1 slopes is recommeded if the irregular rock surface and variable overburden (soil 1 .• cover) depths will permit it. This should be at the discretion of the assigned Resident Engineer. The existing rock slopes are very irregular due to conven- tional blasting. � 1 Soils Exploratory borings for structure and embankment foundation information along the project show the typical soils to be clayey to sandy silts and silty clays varying from fine textured to rocky. The soil chosen for the base design is a gravelly sandy silt generally present in the construction zone. The following test data of the soil are extracted from Laboratory Report No. 787647, on file ' with the Materials Section of the Oregon State Highway Division. CLASSI- SIEVE FICATION SOIL CONSTANTS ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS qu ast c as c ass ng AASHTO Limit Limit Index No. 200 Sieve % 2mm* % Sand % Silt % Clay 1. _ A-4(6) 29 22 7 66.8 9.6 23.6 47.0 19.8 * _ larger than. The A-4(6) classification designates the soil as being fair to poor for subgrade or embankment material. An explanation of the other table headings and the impact of the test data on the proposed construction follows this text. l VI-5 Granular material in the form of rocky soil and soft weathered lava rock may be expected in the deeper cut sections throughout most of the project. ^ � Lava rock occurrences indicate a very irregular rock profile. In the vicinity of the 'forth Tigard Interchange lava rock is exposed in the existing cuts. Exploratory borings in the proposed cut section of the Interchange complex from freeway Station 410+50 to 411+50 disclosed hard, blocky rock with overburden soil depths of 7.5 to 21.0 feet. The material from freeway Station 413+00 ,to 417+00, also within the Interchange complex, varies from soil to rocky soil and severely weathered soft lava rock. Farther south in the Haines Road Interchange complex, from freeway Station 38+80 to 44+50, the material likewise varies from soil to rocky soil and severely weathered soft lava rock except at Station 39+50. Here, a test boring disclosed hard, blocky lava rock from 5.3 to 19.0 feet underlain and overlain by soft weathered material. Large boulders may be expected, particularly on the left or east side of the freeway, south of Haines Road. TABLE EXPLANATION 1. AASHTO Classification.--The.American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials classification rates soils on a scale of A-1 through A-7, with the lowest number indicating soils best suited for i subgrades. Additional numbers are added to the basic classification i for more definitive description. The A-4 (6) classification designates the soil as being fair to poor for subgrade or embankment material. 2. Liquid Limit.--This test determines the moisture content at which a soil passing the No. 40 sieve changes from a plastic to a liquid state. The test is an index of cohesion in which the scale of 1 to 100 progressively indicates that the higher the clay content of the soil, the lower is its load-carrying capacity. The test determined that the soil passed from a plastic to a liquid state when its moisture content reached 29 percent. r t VI-6 y 3. Plastic Limit.--This test determines the moisture content at which the soil cfianges from a semi-solid to a plastic state. The plastic limit ! is governed by the clay content. The load-carrying capacity of the soil increases very rapidly as the moisture content is decreased below the plastic limit, and decreases very rapidly as the moisture content i is increased above the plastic limit. The test determined that the soil would be in a semi-solid state when its moisture content was below 22 percent, and in a plastic state when it was above. 4. Plastic Index.--This figure is the numberical difference_between the Liquid'L mi and the Plastic Limit, and represents the range in mois- ture content at which a soil is in a plastic state. A small plastic index, such as 5, shows that a small change in moisture content will change a soil from a semi-solid to a liquid state. Such a soil is )' very sensitive to moisture unless the silt and clay content combined is less than 20 percent. A large plastic index, such as 20, shows that considerable water can be added before the soil becomes liquid. The soil is plastic between a moisture range of 22 to 29 percent and, because of its moderate silt and clay content (66.8 percent), is moderately sensitive to moisture. 5. Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve.--The significance of this test is that - it separates t a fines clay and silt) from the granular (sand and gravel) materials on a percentage basis. The moderate percentage of fine material (66.8 percent), indicates that the soil is fair to poor for subgrade and embankment construction. 6. Hydrometer Analysis.--This test is performed on the No. 10 minus material to determine the percentages of sand, silt, clay, and colloids in the soil sample. The relativel moderate percentages of silt (47.0 percent), and clay (19.8 percent, indicate a fair to poor soil for construction purposes r because with a decrease in particle size the moisture content becomes more critical, drainage problems increase and, due to lack of internal friction, the supporting strength becomes less. Erosion Control 1 Approximately 16.7 acres will be exposed in the project if Alternate 2 is constructed and 10.7 acres if Alternate 3 is constructed. Other than seeding t (grass) and mulching, and the use of hay bales, it is not known at this early pre-contract date what other methods, if any, will be used to control erosion. N k:, l VI-7 It is important that the seeding, fertilizing, and mulching be applied in sufficient time during the growing season to assure germination and growth to stabilize the exposed areas and provide a protective cover, particularly for the slopes. If for some reason the slopes are not protected by grass or other flora before the fall and winter rains, means should be taken to prevent as much soil erosion as possible. In addition to seeding and mulching the fill slopes bridging the gully and intermittent stream in the vicinity of freeway Station 422+00, hay bales I also will be used to alleviate siltation of the stream. Surface runoff from the random fill area in the gully east of the freeway will be directed toward one or more points along the adjacent ditch rechannelizing the stream. Hay bales will be placed at these points, as well as above and adjacent to the culvert inlet to lessen siltation. On the west side of the fill, hay bales are to be placed at the bottom near the freeway right-of-way line to prevent eroded material from entering the stream. As some gullying of this 2:1 slope is to be expected, cross drains along it may prove beneficial. The use of hay bales act as both energy dissipators and filters, and provide erosion and siltation control until the grass and/or other flora becomes well established. It is the policy of the Oregon State Highway Division to stipulate in its road grading contracts that all ground surfaces exposed to erosion be seeded and mulched. Other methods of erosion control are either stipulated in the contract or, in some unforeseen situations, may be decided by the Resident Engineer in the field during construction. A fund for this is provided in the contract. The work is done in stages along the project as soon as practicable } i VI-8 ; i 1 after areas to be seeded and mulched are completed. To assure that there is no undue delay in applying the erosion control measures, the engineer can direct the contractor when to perform the work. Inspection and maintenance of erosion control measures, both temporary and permanent, is standard policy of the OSHD. 1 Federal Highway Administration specifications for the federal aid { ( programs in which grading is involved stipulate the following: "Under no conditions shall the amount of surface area of erodible earth material exposed at one time by excavation, borrow or fill within the right-of-way exceed 750,000 square feet (17.22 acres) without prior approval by the Engineer." and "Under no conditions shall the surface area of erodible earth material exposed at one time by clearing and grubbing exceed 750,000 square feet without approval by the Engineer." Within the limits of the above FHWA specifications, the engineer may increase or decrease the amount of surface area of erodible earth material to be exposed at one time by clearing and grubbing, excavation, borrow and fill operations ( - as determined by his analysis of project conditions. i r Potential Material Sources No state-owned material source exists in the area and it is recommended that the choice of a suitable source be the responsibility of the contractor. Several of the commercial sources in the area believed most likely to be used tfor the project, based on suitability and economics, are the: 1) Santosh Gravel Pit; 2) Hardtack Island Gravel Pit; 3) Tonquin Quarry; and 4) the Rivergate t_ Quarry. Table VI-2, following, lists the physical aspects of these sources. ,4 0 .t N al A L Y CW Or 41 %on S.3 C NU Lp 4L+ W y = •S S- V '•"'1 3 w C L id Be CA CD, F�N N S " a.l L A C W = Z r 4,ig Ea�o QQ _. w roCL Lp. r- aJ IC r• d a710 Q~ Vy c. E v A 3 aL+. .a- of al E OC Z ��.. ^•'•. L a, y L y. A N N QN pE 1.1 C U _ CT A A aJ A a Y V&n > O•O V r• C C 7 A N Q Q C Y C NJam. O'O EE r A N- at u 1q Yp A tl'1 O N •> d •L O d N •^3 L N C a 7 14 r- O S O 1 L A d d 7 (.� d V W = A r A A S N OCC d CA O >••A-•Y 7 A U •O N CL'11'1 L . 7v Y E •O. p Q N N CCC Na w Q rr p O p C O ^ V Cfgg.9 V 31>O NZ �C V1v A L yk-y0. N V O •v d G w •.CjA�11 Y LI L aC dVV1 Y6Yl C U © Oa/ I- S. C10 oN IY CT A N hO•- C O N Q A L A� C t3•.-N >O L N C p N _ Q$ W N E 8 Lp q p IAC L O•.• y CUC CC N O ¢Z 1/1 [O 6 d Y •.,1 H Y O A N al > 1 H _ w� J •.+ D A V C 9 0140-••O• . .. •d.. 0. •.G- A OWa4, L1YAQ y OAQNY �. W CC J Y a1 r�. V > C d Y A Y a7•L.1ro y. C�U/4 A L L GUp OQ YY L C tTN QY L �... r it L A 1••.Ol Y U sp.... i7 4! .O r. O wyl a N •p i C L +r- 1Q Q 42 0 L '13 Y4.• N v L Y w Y N O •� f.Al S.d' a N O C A Y A1C L W•rYY •GV1 W L L•r- C W n^S N •� A N L A a in "• A Nr d L Lpo�N E C Yy Y L C Ip N 'V A '•w1 0^+•1 l►• w wOE G C E C.A• 1'11 C~M a C ro v L d q COC C r C L.w Q u w A•� A +N A CT A d O yp1 -F.w N U �. Y• !Y d 41 C L� a♦N� 91 41 L"i3 7 L AY C > a) C 7Y O� L' N r.. cr Go L ... S q A o c ora ga �Cd••C- Sd QU m N d d Z Va NA •••1 OC 0. L•r NTA O Y C `O a Y N A yAy N LYE O� d 1.. .•H�A N L•r►+ 6C LL A Q C'+al N Y E N A Y L O r A O of o� 0, V 'OC Q I .^ T Ep'Cc d W 1--ci O O A i S LIal =Y- a 7Y7 Z7 L A M = O/ L LI! i1 L7 C C +A U C .010 d C.ice a/ N W= .f A N R/ a d 6 3 r••• d N 15 r•O L pp CY w O t? CC E E N d d vqq •pol v w Y al In m v- ar L Y c al q N A N 1d0 C Y L C N d ^ ro V C Y V d L L f11 M L C C _V C .N NNS U C" 10d0A O a1 O E M Y M N •O N C O ; N U- W u w C. L A s L L = O O 7 L A N > C > f)1 O 41 OJ a1 In m 812; 1.0 S� 01. d V1 0. d d U A GA >a O O 4 La Li NOC1 W H tA W W •.• _ Q. .V�O. ¢¢ � 1••- m cm HQ V w d V mN ~ IjW W W J N O ljF0. . _ W tj .. .. d O 6 N O CC "•.. J _ dI-9 1 It is estimated that approximately 115,000 cubic yards of crushed aggregate will be required for the project's Alternate 2 and 105,000 cubic yards for Alternate 3. Material Required _ rIt is estimated at this time (October 1976) that approximately 55,000 ` cubic yards of aggregate will be required for surfacing and incidental construc- tion for Alternate 2, and about 45,000 cubic yards for Alternate 3. These figures must be considered estimates because field conditions may necessitate changes. ~ Excavation and Embankment Alternate 2 is estimated as requiring about 155,300 cubic yards of excavation and 151 ,600 cubic yards of common embankment material. Alternate 3 is estimated as requiring about 121,000 cubic yards of excavation and 128,800 _ cubic yards of common embankment material . These figures likewise must be :l considered estimates at this time. The following table presents the figures in comparative form: � r ALTERNATES 3 Excavation --- 155,300 cubic yards 121,000 cubic yards 1 - Embankment --- 151 ,600 cubic yards 128,800 cubic yards i . Waste. Sites No waste sites outside the project limits are required. The gully 1 east of the freeway in the vicinity of Station 422+00 will be random filled with VI-10 about 25 OOG _joie yards of common embankment material. The remaining surplus can be distributed along the project without difficulty. (The difference between waste and surplus material is that waste must be stored outside the project limits, whereas surplus is used or distributed within the project). Ground Water Water well logs on file in the State Engineer's Office indicate that the static ground water levels in the project are well below the freeway con- struction depths. A 510-foot well, drilled in November, 1953 for a restaurant on Barbur Boulevard in the North Tigard Interchange area, registered a static water level of 210 feet.below land surface. Two other wells, located approxi- mately three-fourths mile east and one-half mile south of the above-cited well, registered static water levels of 80 feet below land surface, and 23 feet below land surface, respectively. It is likely, however, that isolated tones of perched ground water (held above the regional water table by impermeable material such as clay) occur in the project area, and that they contribute to the surface water runoff. This - occurs particularly during the rainy seasons, and continues until the aquifers are depleted to the level that they stop flowing. ' Surface water runoff presents problems in several areas along the project, and these are discussed in the Hydrology Section of this Draft Environ- mental Impact Statement. r Protection of Survey Monuments Oregon State Highway Division procedures insure that all vertical and horizontal monuments endangered by a proposed project are relocated. In the VI-11 case of National Geodetic Survey monuments, notification is made directly to the National Geodetic Survey mark maintenance engineer. The Hational Geodetic provides the funding Survey p g for monument relocation. It has been determined that no survey monuments exist in the project i area. Ai t 1 � t : i.. i. TABLE VI-2 GEOLOGIC IMPACT SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE 1 2 ALTERNATIVE 3 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS Nn-Build Widen I-5 Widen 1-5 Rebuild North Tigard Interchange, Rebuild North Tigard Interchange, Including Truck Lane including Truck lane Reconstruct Hanes Road Overpass Reconstruct Haines Road Overpass Revise Haines Road Interchange Close Haines Road interchange POSITIVE IMPACTS: Topography No landscape denradation None Hone Soils 7 No soil disturbance None Haines Road interchange ramps will be obliterated _ Erosion No erosion increase None None !Materials No material committed None None + i Ground Water None Drainage will be imnroved Dratnane will be improved E TEMPORARY ADVERSE iMMPACTS: Less landscape degradation TopOgraD►MY None landscape degradation I None Vegetative soil zone disturbed on Vegetative soil zone disturbed Solis ii 17.2 acres on 7.6 acres Erosion (! Nane Erosion potential of i7.2 acres Erosion potential of 7.6 acres Materials None Commitment of rock materials Commitment of rock materials f Seasonal pondinq will continue None None Ground Water ! . � PERwaNENT ADVERSE 104PACTS: Topography Name Landscape degradation due to cuts t Less landscape degradation due and fills to cuts and fills Sptis None Loss of about 4.7 acres to new loss of about 3.6 acres to roadway new roadway Erosion None Potential erosion of portions Potential erosion of portions cf 17.2 acres I of 7.6 acres None Abnut 55.000 cubic yards of aggregate. I About 45,000 cubic yards of agg- Materiels 151.600 cubic yards of cnmmtn embankment M ceq�ato.l?Aankmentcubic material rdS Of material Ground Water Seasonal ponding will continue None i Mone SHORT-TERM USE vs. LONG-TEPA PRODUCTIVITY: IPresent landscape will be permanently Less of the present landscape Topography No landscape change changed wilt be permanently changed No Soils change About 8.7 acres will be permanently About 3.6 acres will be ft Sotls committed to new roadway permanently committed to new roadway No erosion change Short-term exposure will be succeeded Shp exposure will be Erosion ended ber, by Iona-term cover plus obliterated street area ' Materials No material committed eae�fal.to be put toyards longftermause� mbti. to be put ut 1121 w c. to long-termuse excavated No water level change Drainage will be improved on a long- Drainane will be improved on Ground Water term basis a long-term basis IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE B C"ITNENT OF RESOURCES: i 1 I Nateriais mm No material coitted A total of about 210,300 cubic yards A total of about 166,na, cubic of materials will be irretrievably ff yards of materials wilt be committed ! irretrievably committed � 1� r VI-12 V NORTH TIGARD-SOUTH TIGARD Project No. 626-1973-923 BIBLIOGRAPHY ' i 1. Beaulieu, J. D., 1971, Geologic Formations of Western Oregon, West of Longitude 120° 30' : Oregon Department Geology and Mineral Industries, Bull. 70, 72 p. t 2. Hart, D. H., and Newcomb, R. C., 1965, Geology and Ground Water of the i Tualatin Valley, Oregon: U. S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1967. 3. Schiicker, H. G. , and Deacon, R. J., 1967, Engineering Geology of the Tualatin Valley Region, Oregon: Oregon Department Geology and Mineral Industries, Bull. ,60, 103 p. 1 . i _ l : VII-1 1 j. WATER QUALITY Study Approach The body of data used to write this report was largely obtained from existing reference materials (see Bibliography). An eleven month turbidity and flow study was conducted at one site on Ball Creek. Weekly to semi-monthly samples were taken. Turbidity samples were collected in rinsed polyethylene containers and preserved with l mg/liter HgC12. They were returned to the laboratory and measured for turbidity within six hours after collection on a Hach Test Kit colorimeter. A distilled water blank was used to zero the meter. Flow measurements were taken at the same cross-section over the sampling period. Width and depth were measured with a tape measure and a leveling rod. Three or four depths were taken across the cross-section and averaged. Velocity was measured by determining the travel time of a wood chip or similar object through hrou h a distance of ten feet, five feet above and five feet below the cross-section. The roughness factor was assumed to be 1.0, as the creek channel was clear of vegetation for most of the year for a short distance upstream and downstream of the cross-section. Vegetation did become quite dense during the summer months further upstream and downstream of the sampling site, however. Spot checks on water quality were run at several sites. A Hach Field Test Kit was used for all measurements except the later date (1976) pH measure- ments. A corning Model 610A battery-operated pH meter was used for the latter . determinations. VII-2 1 Existing Environment 1 Hydrology The project corridor crosses the west slope of Mt. Sylvania, which is ` drained b a network of tributaries o Y tar est the Tualatin River. . Several first and second order streams including Ash Creek, Ball Creek, Carter Creek, and a number � 1 of unnamed tributaries drain into a larger downslope tributary called Fanno Creek, which enters the Tualatin River at R.M. 9.4. The Fanno Creek watershed, which occupies 32.5 square miles (20,800 acres), is shown in Figure VII-1. Fanno Creek, as well as the Tualatin River itself, has experienced an alteration 1 of its hydrologic characteristics in recent years as the watershed has been r t ansformed from a predominantly rural/suburban area to an urban/light industrial [ _ one. Surface water runoff has greatly increased as the area had developed, since 1 ground surface which normally allows rain waters to infiltrate into it has been covered with impermeable surfaces such as roads and houses. Therefore, much water which formerly percolated into the ground to join the local or regional water table now is conducted via roads, ditches, sewers, etc. directly to surface drainages, increasing peak storm flows. Further contributing to an increase in storm flows is fill and development on the flood plain, which results in a decrease in flood storage area and an alteration of flood flows. Flood flows in the Fanno Creek system, typical of small streams draining urban areas, are characterized by fast rises immediately after heavy rains and crest, shortly after rainfall ceases (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1969). Only one unnamed intermittent stream (directly entering Fanno Creek) actually crosses the proposed corridor (see Figure VII-2). It occupies a steep, well-vegetated canyon and passes under the existing highway (1-5) at Station t VII-3 tt 421, via a 30-inch, 440-foot concrete pipe culvert. Near the northern terminus of the project, a tributary to Ash Creek originates from springs now located under the freeway at Station 386 and flows westerly into Ash Creek. Ball Creek and Carter Creek, both extensively altered by channelization and culvertization, cross I-5 south of the southern terminus of the project at South Tigard Inter- ch I ange. nterchange. A general discussion of the water quality and aquatic biota in lower Fanno Creek and associated tributaries (some of which fall outside the immediate j study area) will follow. This discussion will establish the aquatic "context" j of the area, upon which the alterations caused by this project will be super- imposed. In this way, the relative magnitude of those alterations will be more clearly demonstrated. Water Quality1 Water quality of these streams has deteriorated along with the increase in 'the rate of development. Department of Environmental Quality records indicate that sewage contamination in Fanno Creek is a continuing problem, with fecal coliform levels hovering at or above (up to 2.5 times--see Table VII-1) the DEQ standard of an MPN of 240 per 100 mi (Special Water Quality Standards for the j Tualatin River Basin, June, 1974). From the little data available, however, it appears that conditions have improved within the past five years; one low water sample taken from Fanno Creek on September 16, 1969, indicated fecal coliform levels of 24,000 per 100 ml, which is 100 times the standard. Elevated fecal coliform levels are accompanied by low dissolved oxygen concentrations (those on record when associated with high fecal coliform are all well below the 90-95% i saturation levels required by DEQ for this river basin), and by very high nutrient levels (nitrates, phosphates, ammonia). Conditions have apparently gradually D improved as sewage treatment plants are installed and treatment methods upgraded. 9 { 26 26 .n„ ZOB — RALEIGH HILLS aC W Eli! � T 17 a 000Pep>fAm - PROnECT tt 5� �rrujyh LIMITS 43 MT,SYLVANIA Z 1 'rilf�r \1ff�t I/1 t s _ \��•,'lr`r�,i.�� 99 Iry • .. = BULL MTN.'r ' it Ilk EGO LAKE 9 O ry 8 TUALATIN 212 O Figura VII-1 q EP FANNO CREEK WATERSHEDAND P� - • SAMPLING STATIONS 1,2,8wW9 A� t _ i f N.TIGARD ,p INTERCHANGE gyp gyyfl, ©pyp v�� ` � 4A �wP C PFS 6P' ,yam Cr�y� tig 1 4 3 a QO. 00 ` wPORTLAND MT. SYLVANIA p1� s� F� PLAZA COMMUNITY 5 SOUTHWEST -� COLLEGE I .Ju�-l- HAINES RD. �.. BAYLOR • ` ]FI! U SOUTHVIEW ST. 'Fp _ �/1 Ix 90 Q III$ R , DOUGLAS 1 D 3 _ \/ p n ui ) ` o, 400 SOUTHWDODi PARK I +e �ti HAMPTON ST. OFFICE COMMERCIAL Figure VII-2 TOPOGRAPHIC ISOPLETHS S.TIGARD AND AQUATIC FEATURES -ho qj, 9 p�� I INTERCHANGE AND SAMPLING STATIONS • ii 9�G9g0 � � 3 4hru 7 �� kRug ?6p f RiONST.1 I �. . 15� 7 arte s VII-4 Y q N .aC�, v •A-^ of r v M N O m v � Dg+ O 00 M r 111 N m m02 M ^ ry Y O CD _ yc, �L1MQ o v N v O o ry r a mm i E .Go -M O O O O O C O CDM C r Y'f 1 N OR N N m N ul r r �p U1 O O O O M M C� CO M CO W A R N m m' v O m r r r ECCE .- N O O iO a O 10 W N O O �O O -4 �D q+ 1A ^ A Ip � ^ 10 4 P 0.O 0 m 0 10 o o m a o r NM N co M N M N C M 10 .O N Sp W V•v CO O O O O O. O O O N OLn L wp.q � N N Q[D e0 N ^ m A N A m N N N O O O q Y /• r r r r r r r r 41 Y V p S r O lv NO CO O m m lo �o � N el V G Y v i y F N m O M O• O A O 1(1 A N M co 00 T to �p .� Q S 4 H p > IO G - T G m— /J, r M M N M1 M A O N �!1 Ip Ix O� Go O m ap m f aG O N M Q M N aD Ep N Ln N W v M M M1p lD MMM M Q A n N A O O O ^ A �y•.. A A AAA AAA A A L A A A L L e! el S. L. n c� n .+ a �' a tj c q q q q q G G G q m e. = W U > > > q c cn. N M N N M Q Q v r m N r N ^ �O N .A•. Y q O O 4 i N r Y N G 2 W CO p' 1/S p p Y y m cL d L q Y L L L N m L /i` J U. L UOCC OCC Y/ OCC G � q Y 7 W LL Q IiY�In L GL . - "O' u s u r e+ .1(* • r O q pg # a L LLZ2A .r-m6 O. COC '� E•yOZ I N MQlfl �4A CO P 5 - 1%tYJf VII-4 Most recent available fecal coliform measurements on Fanno Creek (March, June, 1975) indicate levels below the standard MPN of 240 per ml (i.e. , 130 and 60 per 100 mi respectively). Additionally, a development known as Southwood Park on the southeast side of the project area (see Figure VII-3), has severe septic tank limitations and an inadequate sewer system at this time (Unified Sewerage Agency, Washington County, 1976). ' Sewage contamination of the ground water and subsequently of localsurfacedrainages (including Ball Creek and Carter Creek) is considerable especially at periods of low flow, as can be observed from high nutrient concen- trations in creek water samples. A sewage system has been proposed for this area including Southwood Park and surrounding unsewered sections east of I-5 and west of Mt. ;Sylvania, between Barbur Blvd. and Carmen Road. This will greatly reduce groundwater and local surface water contamination problems. Further, loss of vegetative cover over considerable portions of the watershed as well as the extensive use of fill in localized areas has caused erosion, turbidity and siltation to become a problem throughout much of the Tualatin River system, particularly in the lower portions, including Fanno Creek and its tributaries. In parts of the Fanno Creek system, particularly where fill or poorly vegetated areas are traversed, turbidities exceeding 30 NTU* (the level used by DEQ to determine which of two turbidity standards will be used) are routinely observed, although of course turbidities vary considerably by season. An eleven-month study of Ball Creek turbidity (see Figure VII-3) at a site just south of_South Tigard Interchange (see Site 7 on Figure VII-2) showed what is probably a typical pattern of annual turbidity variation in this watershed, *Nephelometric Turbidity Units _ r r^ . a a y W O J 00 '. 1n th > to Ln O u� g �. 1Y N V N .J Y � @6 Clj O p pp O In r TURBIDITY (NTU)- I f . I Q n co U. 1 co O C1 47 n M � m _N 7 P j LL Q Lo O u LU v ui cc U J Y J Q m n N O M O ID O N O �sg N N .— r STREAMFIOW, O (cfs) r k VII-5 s t and is correlated fairly well with streamfiow (see Figure VII-4). One extremely high but-ephemeral-measurement was recorded in April, 1975, after-a construction spill into the creek a short distance upstream. The concentration increase was ( intensified by low flow conditions at that time. The occurrence of that turbidity 1 spike is, typical of short-termconstruction effects in small drainages during low flow periods. In general, streams in the project area exhibit fairly low flows for - most of the year, adequate to low dissolved oxygen levels, moderate (approximately neutral) pH, moderate to high temperatures, moderate total alkalinity and hardness levels, variable_turbidity levels, and elevated nitrate and phosphate"concentra- tions (more so during low flow periods than high flow periods) High nutrient levels, aggravated by elevated temperatures, trigger the development of algal blooms, which, in addition to inhibiting light penetration into the water column, i exert a considerable oxygen demand on overlying water once death and decay sets in, and inhibit the production of important fish food species both directly and indirectly. In general, the quality of these streams can be considered fair to poor in terms of their suitability for aquatic life. t A uq atic Habitat There are no salmonid fish species such as salmon and trout present in ' the Fanno Creek system. A local resident reports that cutthroat trout once ' frequented Ash Creek, but none have been observed there for the last five to 10 years. The Oregon State Game Commission (now Oregon Department of Fisheries and r Wildlife) investigation "Fish and Wildlife Resources of the Lower Willamette Basin, Oregon, and Their {Dater Use Requirements" (June, 1964) does not indicate the presence of anadromous or resident salmonid fish species in the Fanno Creek VII-6 system. Contact with the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife (August, 1974) confirms that this is still the case; they further indicate that some ,warm water species are present (see Table VII-2), but that no significant fishery exists for these species. A partial list of invertebrates present in the lower Tualatin River basin is also shown in Table VII-2. The invertebrate species list is general, indicating broad groupings of organisms and the presence of aquatic invertebrates from a wide range of microhabitats. Thus it is of little use in indicating the invertebrate population of any particular stream locality, but does provide indication of types of species present in the general area. Factors which affect the distribution and abundance of any of these species in any particular place include current speed, temperature, bottom composition and dissolved substances (including oxygen, pH, hardness and nutrients). Other important factors include liability to drought and to floods, food, competition between species and shad (Hynes, 1972). The species present are in general semi-tolerant to tolerant of degraded environmental conditions. In summary, the existing condition of Fanno Creek and its tributaries in terms of hydrology and water quality is fair to poor. Aquatic biota present are mostly in the form of species tolerant to less than ideal environmental conditions. Impacts Alternative l No Build Only small alterations of the aquatic system wouldresultif the No-Build alternative were selected. ` � VII-7 r_ A slight alteration of local drainage patterns both upstream and downstream of existing culverts may occur as their capacities are exceeded. With developmentcontinuing as it is in this watershed, increases in surface i runoff are to be expected whether the highway facility is modified or not. Local alterations of erosional and depositional patterns will occur as a given- sized culvert is forced to convey ever-increasing quantities of runoff. r r TABLE VII-2 i Partial Inventory of Aquatic Biota in the Fanno Creek System (Oregon Dept. of Fisheries & Wildlife, April , 1975) Warm WaterFishInvertebrates* l4 Cottids Annelid Worms (earth worms, sludge worms, & leaches) Dace Molluscs (snails & clams) Suckers Crustaceans: Redside Shiners Crayfish Squawfish Isopods t .3 Amphipods Mayflies-running water Stoneflies-running water Dragonflies, damselflies-pond, shallow lake Waterbugs, water striders, and backswimmers Alderflies, dobsonflies, and hellgrammites Caddi sfl ies Whirligig beetles and diving beetles Midges, mosquitoes and other true flies *Found in the lower Tualatin Basin t Further, given that no additional roadway is constructed and road runoff quantities - remain constant, pollutants in runoff from the roadway (oils, greases, lead, ;. ' cadmium, manganese, asbestos, etc.), will increase in concentration as traffic volumes increase. Of course, roadway pollutants wili be diluted by increasing VII-8 quantities of runoff coming from other areas, but at the same time those pollutants will interact with pollutants (silt most particularly) , in the incoming runoff water. The quantitative effect of this is not known, but it is obvious that selection of the No-Build alternative does not guarantee the maintenance of an aquatic statusuq_o. Selection of the No-Build alternative would have no effect on flood flows and flood storage ground water contamination, or erosion from cut and �. fill slopes. Alternative 2 (Haines In) Impacts Alternative 2 will have minor impact on the Fanno Creek System as a whole. Temporarily,-moderate' to severe disturbance will occur in the Fanno Creek tributary which crosses Interstate 5, but this stream is not a highly productive part of the watershed. Otherwise, impact of this alternative i on the aquatic system can be considered minor. { Aquatic impacts accruing from the selection of this alternative include alteration of local drainage patterns, alteration of flood flows, disruption of aquatic biota and stream quality at the Fanno Creek tributary, alteration in quality and quantity of storm sewer effluent, erosion of cut and fill slopes into local waterways, an increase in ground water contamination in some areas near the roadway, and improvement of drainage facilities across the roadway. Most alterations will be minor in their effect. Since some watershed area will be paved over with the selection of ` this alternative, less percolation of precipitation into the ground water table G ,z� VII-9 and more surface runoff will result. However, since the area to be paved in under this alternative is 4.7 acres, i.e., only 0.02% of the total area of Fanno 1 Creek watershed, it is not expected that a significant shift in the ground 1 water/surface water storage ratio will occur. Also associated with increased surface runoff from paving and removal of vegetation is an increase in both the size and shape of high water and flood peaks. Increased runoff increases the size and decreases the response time of storm peaks. Here again, however, since ( the additional pavement amounts to only 4.7 acres, the effect this will have on 1 Fanno Creek storm peaks is minor. Another problem related to diversion of some incident precipitation from ground water to surface water reservoirs is the probable (minor) increase in sewage contaminant concentrations due to lower dilution by ground water. Storm sewer effluent, on the other hand, will be more diluted than it is pre- sently due to increased surface runoff. This will counteract to an undetermined extent the increase of pollutants in road runoff resulting from higher traffic vo`umes. The greatest impact this project will have on the aquatic environment e will be disruption of biota, vegetation and stream quality at the Fanno Creek i tributary crossing the project area at State 421+42. Impact from this will be considerably reduced however by the mitigative measures detailed below. The creek will be rechannelized in its headwater area above the existing culvert on the east side of the freeway. The old channel and most of the creek valley will be random-filled on a I percent grade in order to direct runoff waters to the inlet of the new 42" CHIP culvert. The new culvert, at Station 422, will be larger and on a shallower grade (0.10 percent) than the existing concrete pipe at Station 421+42. It has been designed to adequately accept incoming runoff ,�--. for the next twenty years, based on growth projections for the area. VII-10 To that extent, it will be an improvement over the existing pipe Existing aquatic biota and vegetation occupying the creek and creek valley where the random fill and culvert extensions are to be placed will be destroyed, with the exception of a few organisms which are able to rapidly relocate. Few, if any, fish are present at the upper creek, however, as the gradient of both the creek and the existing culvert is very steep, and the culvert length is considerable. Temporary downstream degradation of water quality, especially elevated turbidity, RR will occur, although measures will be taken to minimize this and to minimize long-term water quality problems. It is highly improbable that the zone of disturbance (except very temporarily) will extend to its confluence with Fanno Creek. Not more than twenty-seven acres of cut and fill slope will be exposed as a consequence of roadway construction if this alternative.is selected. Due to heavy precipitation and the presence of highly erodible soils in this area, erosion from exposed surfaces would be considerable were mitigative measures not taken to reduce this action. See Geology report for more information concerning source erosion and source erosion control . Some of this eroded material will find its way into local surface waterways. In this instance the only waterways to be affected will be the Fanno Creek tributary and possibly the Ash Creek tributary on the northwestern end of the project. Minimization of Harm The primary aquatic area requiring mitigative measures on this project i is Fanno Creek tributary, since it will t filled, rechannelized, and reculverted. Hay bales will be placed on the west side of the random fill (which is on the east side of the highway) above the culvert crossing and at the culvert inlet. 1 J VII-11 , The hay bales act as energy dissipators, filters and create slack water behind them, which allows sediment particles to settle out. They provide short to medium term erosion control and allow long-term measures (see Geology) to become ( well established. The random fill , which acts as a detention basin for water 1 flowing into the culvert, will be planted with grass and brush. At the culvert outlet will be a concrete flume with energy dissipators (probably large riprap) and a chute to break the force of water coming through the short, steep culvert. Additionally, hay bales will be placed at intervals along the fill slope on the west side of the freeway to further reduce sediment inputs into the creek. See 4 GeoloLv section for a complete discussion of additional erosion control measures to be utilized on all cut and fill slopes. Mitigation measures to compensate for increased flows caused by the additional 4.7 acres and pavement proposed under Alternative 2 are as follows: (see attached) 1 . In the Barbur Boulevard Interchange, the storm sewer beginning at L"6" Station 407+50 and terminating at L"6" Station 422 can outfall into the detention basin upstream from the proposed 42-inch CMP. 2. In the Haines Road Interchange, the storm sewer beginning Station L"5" 41+70 and terminating at "A" Station 51 could incorporate detention. This detention could be either (1) subsurface in the form of 48-inch diameter pipe with a restricted outfall , or (2) surface basins located in the area adjacent to the "C" line and the triangular area bounded by the L"5", "A" and "B" lines. Alternatives Impacts t Impacts resulting from the selection of Alternative 3 will be the t same as those described for Alternative 2, although the significance of the i t negative impacts will be slightly smaller with Alternative 3. The primary differences between the two alternatives as they relate to aquatic impacts VII-12 are (1) 3.6 acres of previously open land will be paved, as opposed to 4.7 acres for Alternative 2 and (2) not more than 17 acres of exposed surface area on cut and fill slopes will result from the selection of this alternative, ' contrasted to 27 with Alternative 2, with concomitantly less erosion quantitatively. Mitigation The procedures discussed under Alternative 2 will also be used if Alternative 3 is selected. 1 I 1 l VII- 13 f 1 [ BIBLIOGRAPHY 1 Hynes, ,H.B.N. , 1972. The Ecology of Running Waters. University of Toronto Press. 2. Oregon State Game Commission (now Oregon Department of Fisheries and Wildlife), June, 1964. Fish and Wildlife Resources of the Lower Willamette Basin. Portla�n Egon. y` 3. State of Oregon, Department of Environmental Quality, June, 1974. Regulations Relating to Water Quality Control in Oregon. Sections from OregonmA ia— nistraLive Rules, apte—F-M.— . 4. United Sewerage Agency, Washington County, Jan. , 1976. Draft Lower Tualatin Facilities Plan Washington County, Oregon. 5. U.S. Army Corps,of Engineers, June, 1969. Flood Plain Information: Tualatin River and Tributaries. Prepared for Washington County, 1rem gon, by U.S. Army Engineer—District, Portland. Corps of Engineers, Portland, Oregon. :l VC 1 C - VIII-1 I l BIOLOGY Methods The study area chosen for this biology analysis is a corridor 2,000 feet wide extending from the North Tigard Intersection to the South Tigard Intersection; the corridor is centered on the centerline of Interstate 5. The study area was made large enough so that l) locally significant habitat features would be included, and 2) so that no primary impacts would occur outside or near its boundaries. An aerial photographic mosaic was used to delineate the boundaries of vegetation cover types and these types were tentatively classified. One or more stands per cover type were selected for field sampling by an expanded "Point Quarter" survey. Ground truthing of the initial type classifications and a less detailed habitat investigation was conducted at other representative locations throughout the remainder of the study area to expand on the data gathered from "Point Quarter" sampling sites; this procedure is more efficient than relying J solely on a "Point-Quarter" survey and judged adequate for this project area. The Point-Quarter survey is a plotless method of investigating woodland or shrub stands. It allows estimates to be made of tree species composition, dominance, density and relative importance within a stand. In addition to the basic measurements of this system, data were collected on tree height, age, diameter, species distribution, and the estimated visibility by quadrant. Notes were made on the structural stratification of the stand (i.e. , canopy, competing tree layer, sapling-shrub layer, and herbaceous layer). -� VIII-2 The occurrence of wildlife evidence and the presence of den trees were _ noted. These data not only are useful in evaluating present habitat character- istics but can establish past history and future trends In predominantly residential areas, a simple species count was made of ornamental trees and shrubs along selected streets; this was done to establish species ratios which were applied over the "residential habitat type" since many ornamentals are important sources of wildlife food and cover. Analysis of Impacts Forecast changes in existing habitat conditions were considered negative whenever the change would result in: - 1. A direct loss of productive habitat as a result of any cause. 2. A destructive alteration of "critical habitat" prohibiting re- replacement in kind. 3. The substitution of habitat with fewer or less varied resources (food, cover, water proximity) than are available in existing habitat. . . Changes were considered positive to varying degrees whenever: 1. Existing paved surface is to be obliterated and replaced by �.. vegetation. 2. "Critical wildlife habitat" is expanded or enhanced. 3. The interspersion of habitat types or resources will be changed �.._ in an advantageous manner. f Because any change in habitat has both positive and negative results when different organisms are considered, the value judgments of this report are VIII-3 based on species of known interest or, past value to people. Statements of the magnitude or significance are therefore subjective. Existing Environment Overview The strip of land (2000 feet wide) bordering Interstate 5 between the South Tigard Intersection and the North Tigard Intersection is a mixture of developed and relatively undeveloped land. Within the corridor can be found farms, rural dwellings, suburban housing, light industry, and multi-story office buildings. The intrinsic qualities of the wildlife habitat found in the undeveloped areas which are scattered throughout the corridor do not differ markedly from brush, woodland, or grassland habitat which exists throughout the lower Willamette Valley. However, the number of species of wildlife which reside in the corridor r is severely limited by habitat parcel size and the urban nature of the surroundings. Faunal species which require free access to large areas, or whose presence is inhibited by man's activities are uncommon within the corridor. Travel of all but those species possessed of flight, or of a size small enough to allow movement through the culvert system, is impeded by the existing network of heavily traveled freeways and major arterials. Consequently, the fauna of the corridor consists mainly of birds, or of small mammals, reptiles and amphibians which have limited home range requirements (Table 1). Habitat The habitat of the corridor can be classified as woodlands, brush, grassland, or developed. These four types occur both as the result of natural 0 TABLE -VIII-1 fSOME COMMON WILDLIFE OF THE AREA AND THEIR HABITAT REQUIREMENTS -------------HABITAT------------- SPECIES Woodlands Brush Grassland Opossum Raccoon Gray Squirrel Chickaree Deer Mouse Meadow Mouse Tree Mouse 1 Woodrat 1 Gopher Mole Skunk Chipmunk Gray Digger Brush Rabbit --�- Weasel Domestic Dogs Domestic Cats �. Scrub Jay # Stellar's Jay Brewer's Blackbird fit---- Robin . Varied Thrush Bush Tit --N— P Chicadee Nuthatch N---- t Winter Wren --N t . Bewi ck's Wren -----N Song Sparrow --T' �. . Towhee ---N- Hairy Woodpecker ( Downy Woodpecker N Flicker Rufous Hummingbird Table VIII-1 (cont.) ----- ------HABITAT------------- SPECIES Woodlands Brush Grassland Valley Quail Ruffed Grouse -N--- Screech Owl Nighthawk Tree Swallow ! Violet Green Swallow i Horned Lark N Redtaiied Hawk Cooper's Hawk ---ri-- Sparrow Hawk -;T -N— — American Goldfinch Cedar Waxwing N---- White Crowned Sparrow Golden Crowned Sparrow Evening Grosbeak Chipping Sparrow Junco ►� F Savannah Sparrow Vesper Sparrow - -- House Sparrow P i1 1� Preferred Habitat i N Nest Site Preference 1 .VIII-4 1 processes and of cultural development; consequently, there is a great deal of variation within any of these classifications. Woodlands Natural woodlands usually occur in closd canopy stands of varying size, the largest of these being about 15 acres in area. The largest of these stands persist on steeper slopes of the small stream valleys which cross the corridor. Smaller closed canopy stands parallel the right-of-way while others are scattered in a random fashion within the corridor. i These woodlands are usually dense, frequently measuring between 600 and 900 trees per acre. The tallest individuals of these stands (Douglas fir) may be 90 to 130 feet in height but the mean height of the stands is much less (approximately 38 feet). These stands are most frequently dominated by Oregon - white oak or Oregon ash with lesser amounts of Bigleaf maple, Red alder, Douglas fir, or Western Red cedar. Suburban lawns and gardens as well as landscaped areas surrounding office parks are often of a woodland nature. Those which are adjacent to natural woodlands are usually beneficial to songbirds (which are the conspicuous fauna of the area) by creating habitat diversity on a small scale. Food, cover, and shelter are concentrated near such openings in natural woodlands. Yards and gardens which are more distant from woodland sites are also beneficial to bird I ife but the birds which benefit are likely to be of different species (Table l). 1... r Brush Areas occupied by brush comprise only 5 percent of the land within the L.: corridor but most brushland occurs near the right-of-way. Much of this brush L . VIII-5 occurs as a result of right-of-way clearing, landscaping, or invasion of once- cleared lands by vegetation of nearby land. The most commonly occurring plant species of this habitat are Himalaya berry, multiflora and sweetbriar rose, hawthorn, Scotch broom, ninebark, ocean spray, and an occasional Oregon crabapple. In areas where brush is adjacent to woodland it provides an important source of food for woodland birds; when it is adjacent to grassland it serves not only as a source of food but as cover for 'species of grassy areas. In addition, some species of birds and mammals such as the brush rabbit and the towhee seldom stray away from dense brush. Grassland Grasslands occur"throughout the corridor, the larger being associated with farms, school yards, and roadside right-of-way. This habitat also supports its characteristic fauna (Table VIII-1). Although grasslands are potentially very productive, they lack cover. 1 Except for species which burrow beneath the ground, those which are very small , or those with an effective defense (such as body size, fighting ability, or J control of an offensive odor) wildlife use of grasslands is restricted to edges where nearby cover is available. In addition, much of the potential food pro- ductivity of grasslands is lost if they are mowed before seed has matured. This practice greatly reduces their value to wildlife since grass and weed seed is nutritious throughout the year. Seasonal use by birds and small mammals is still high because of the presence of large insect populations. 1 The interspersion of habitat types is an important factor in con- t I rolling ontrolling the distribution and concentration of resources and thus greatly J . influences the nature of the faunal community. Within the study area a high , VIII-6 ! degree of interspersion already exists, largely because of residential develop- ment; the slight increase in interspersion related to this project will be of no significant value. i Fauna, Flora, and Habitat of Special Interest There are no state or federal "threatened or endangered" species of wildlife in the study area nor are there now any habitat features which would be critical to these species should they occupy the area in the future. At this time there is no finalized listing of "threatened or endangered flora"; however, it is anticipated that the status of tentatively listed plants will be made official in the near future. The occurence of seven species of f plants on the proposed list of endangered species (Smithsonian Institution, 1974) has been reported in the northern Willamette Valley in habitats of similar types of those found in the study area (Dyrness et al, 1975). The study area 1 ii was examined and several specimen were tested to determine if any bf the type on the proposed list occurred in the study area. None were determined to be of the proposed endangered species. No known "champion trees" occur in the study area. t._ Impacts - General Existing conditions have limited the nature of the fauna to a great degree. The impacts that are expected to occur from this project are associated with: 1) a quantitative long term loss of existing habitat as additional land is paved; and 2) a qualitative long or short term loss as existing habitat is cleared and then made to conform to highway standards and safety concepts, and 3) continued urban growth resulting in negative changes to surrounding habitat. VIII-7 The impacts to wildlife are considered minor for the following reasons. Although the predicted impacts have a high degree of probability of occurrence and are severe where impacts occur, they are of limited scope. The changes which will occur have local significance but are not significant to the wildlife resources of the county, the state, or the nation. Should no highway construc- tion occur, much the same impacts are expected because of future development of i surrounding land. Highway changes are only expected to influence how quickly this development takes place. Impacts of the Three Alternatives Alternative 1 , The "No-Build" Alternative This alternative has the least impact on wildlife of the three alter natives. No habitat would be changed or removed. No pavement would be obliterated. Stimuli for urbanization of adjacent habitat would be least, especially if the Haines Interchange were closed. The advantage to wildlife is one of time; conditions for wildlife are expected to become worse as the area develops as 1 planned. J Alternative 2 This alternative would have the greatest impact on wildlife of the three alternatives. Table 2 shows the comparative magnitudes of habitat commitments. 1. Approximately 4.7 acres of existing habitat will be paved over, a direct long-term irreversible loss. 2. Approximately 17 additional acres would be cleared and then re ,egetated. The nature of the change which would occur is as follows: �1 TABLE VIII-2 SUMMARY OF HABITAT LOSS AND CHANGE BY HABITAT TYPE --------------------Acreages-----------=------- Alternative TOTAL Woodlands Brush Grassland Res./Ind. 1 (No-Build) 0 0 0 O 2 (With Haines Inter- section) a. long Term Loss 15.2 9.7 0.6 1.3 3.6 b. Short-Term Loss Due to Clearing 19.8 * 1.7 4.9 13.2 c. Medium-Term-(5-15 years) Reduction in Habitat Complexity 1.7 0 1.7 0 0 3 (Without Haines Intersection) a. Long Term Loss 8.3 4.4 0.4 0.9 2.6 b. Short Term Loss Due to Clearing 7.7 * 0.7 1.9 5.1 c. Medium Term Reduction in Habitat Complexity .07 0 0.7 0 0 *Loss is already considered as long-term loss. LE VIII-8 1 a. Long-term loss due to a qualitative reduction of habitat t characteristics•, 4.7 acres. ` b. Medium-term loss due to a qualitative reduction in habitat characteristics where grassland replaces brush; 1.1 acres. C. Short-term loss where grassland replaces grassland or resi- dential habitat; 11.4 acres. This alternative which includes improvement to the Haines Intersection is expected to stimulate the planned development of the adjacent lands more than Alternatives 1 or 3. In so doing, it would have the most adverse effect on existing wildlife. . I Alternative 3 This alternative is of approximately one-half of the magnitude of '- Alternative 2. In terms of habitat commitments the proportion of long-term commitments to total commitments is higher than for Alternative 2 (Table 2). 1 . Approximately 5.7 acres of existing habitat would be committed on - a long-term basis (52% of the total area); 3.5 acres would be paved over and 2.1 acres would undergo long-term degrzdation of existing habitat characteristics. { 2. The remainder (except for 4% brush) would undergo a short-term loss of productivity (approximately 2 years). This alternative will probably have little influence on the rate of growth of adjacent areas. For a complete discussion refer to the economist's report and figure (Location of Sewers in the Study Area) in which the relative influence of sewage lines versus highway access on urban development are compared. s VIII-9 l Minimization of Adverse Impacts The necessity for mitigation in a project such as this where individual adverse impacts are not of major importance nor well defined must be stressed. The cumulative effect of the loss of habitat which results from construction of many such projects is significant, yet the absence of obviously important adverse impacts in a given project encourages overlooking the need to offset the more common impacts. The only sure way to offset this chronic loss of habitat, . y habitat quality, and time is to minimize or mitigate each loss as it occurs, realizing that the significance of an impact cannot always be judged within the limits of a single project. Measures to minimize the loss of wildlife habitat are aimed at re- storing a degree of habitat variety and provide food and cover as quickly as possible to open land in the construction zone. As previously stated, songbirds - are the conspicuous species of the study area. A wide variety of songbirds would benefit if small trees and shrubs were planted in clumps along the highway. Such species as alder, cascara buckthorn, elderberry, hawthorn, honeysuckle, madrone, holly, mountain ash, salal, snowberry, oceanspray and red flowering currant are expecially attractive to birds. Except for alder, none of these species would grow quickly enough to become a safety problem within a reasonable length of time. The differing growth forms of these species would serve to form small dense clumps; these should be spaced as terrain permits, but with a general spacing of about 80 yards. Grasses planted between clumps should be selected for their ability to control erosion but additional features should also be sought. Grasses should � .be low growth form to reduce the necessity of mowing and allow seeds to ripen VIII-10 } and fall. Species whose seeds are not awned or which fall free from the floret are desirable; heavy seed producers are desirable but sodgrasses are preferable to bunchgrasses. These measures are equally applicable to Alternatives 2 and 3; no mitigation is considered necessary for the "No-Build" Alternative. i : j 1 .:l VIII-11 BIBLIOGRAPHY 1 . Franklin, Jerry and C. T. Dyrness. 1973. Natural Vegetation of Oregon and _ Washington. -U.S.D.A., Forest Service GeneraTlec pica sport R P�1 2. Ingles, L. C. 1965. Mammals of the Pacific States. Stanford University Press," Stanford, CA. pages , 3. Martin, A. C. , H. S. Zim, -and A. L. Nelson. 1951 . American Wildlife and Plants. New York: _ Dover Publications. 500 pages. y 4. Randall , W. R. and R. F. Keniston. 1968. Manual of Oregon Trees and Shrubs. Revised edition. Corvallis, Oregon. OSU oo sto�°es--,: Inc. 7 pages, y 5 Stebbins, R. C. 1954. Amphibians and Reptiles tiles of Western North America. New York: McGraw-HiIl`Tioa ompany. 5pages. 6, Smith, R. L. 1966. Eo and Field Biology. New York: Harper and Row. ' 686_pages. tw #. U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service. 1970. Preserving Natural Vegetation. _ 7-L-14000-232, Rev. May, 1970. Jr. Regeneration of WogdX Ve etation Along 8. Blaser, R. E. and W. H. McKee, _ _ 9 Roadsides, Highway Research Recor�NumFer T6T, Hi9'ivsaye2esearFhi card. Washington, 1967. 9. Dyrness, C. T. , Jerry F. Franklin, Chris Maser, Stanton A. Cook, James D. Hall , and Glenda Faxon. 1975. Research Natural Area Needs in the Pacific � Northwest. Pacific Northwest Forest an-^ pange Exper m-ent--!�tation, Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Portland, Oregon. ; t� +h x. ,.c: -A �y MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council August 29, 1985 FROM: William A Monahan, Director. Community Development SUBJECT: Scholls Ferry Road Plan Following your meeting with the City Council of Beaverton, further staff discussions have —occurred concerning the transportation issues at Scholls Ferry Road, 135th, and the extension of Murray Blvd. The staff will present a conceptual plan showing the location of existing and planned intersections along Scholls, as well as potential Murray Road extension alternatives through Tigard. A map showing the transportation concerns will be presented to you at your meeting on September 4, (WAM:br/1783P) CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY { AGENDA OF: September 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: �v DATE SUBMITTED August 21,- 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly Report July, 1985 Community Development PREPARED BY: 41. A Monahan REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK " CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached please find the Monthly report for -July, 1985, prepared by the Department of Community Development. Elements of the report are: 1. Annexation Report 2. Building Division Report 3. Code Enforcement Report 4 Economic Development Minutes S. Engineering Division Report 6. Operations Division Reports 7. Planning Commission Minutes 8. Transportation Committee Minutes ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Accept and place on file. (0950P) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council August 21, 1985 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development `L' SUBJECT: Monthly Report - July, 1985 Attached please find the Monthly Report for July, 1985, prepared by the Department of Community Development. Elements of the report are: 1. Annexation Report 2. Building Division Report 3. Code Enforcement Report 4 Economic Development Minutes 5. Engineering Division Report 6. Planning Decisions 7. Operations Division Report 8. Transportation Committee Minutes Following is a comparison of building activity for July of 1984 and 1985: ti Julys 1984 July, 1985 Single Family Permits 22 27 Multi—Family Permits (total Units) 0 6 Commercial Permits 5 2 Building Permit Fees $ 11,109.00 $ 16,071.00 Plan Check Fees 4,578.36 5,089.10 Plumbing Permits 2,452.79 3,515.00 Mechanical Permits 395.00 445.00 Sign Permits 220.00 100.00 Valuation $ 2,414,599.00 $ 4,232,000.00 Through the first six months of the year, activity compares to 1984 as follows: Single Family Permits 126 162 Multi—Family Permits (total Units) 3 338 Commercial Permits 22 9 Building Permit Fees $ 62,961.60 $ 109,695.50 Plan Check Fees 30,198.42 43,070.90 Plumbing Permits 20,557.49 60,092.28 Mechanical Permits 31018.02 5,957.50 Sign Permits 1,470.00 640.00 Valuation $13,318,504.00 $28,782,499.50 a. (0950) [{6 Building Building revenues again were strong in July as twenty—seven single family permits were issued. Codes enforcement activity was performed systematically as outstanding violations, particularly noxious vegetation, were abated. Economic Development Committee The 'Committee reviewed and authorized an Economic Development Checklist (copy attached), which should assist business wishing to locate in Tigard to obtain the various permits needed. Results of the downtown survey will be tabulated for the August meeting. (WAM:brf0950P) ffs CITYOFTIIFARD 12755 S.W.ASH P.O. BOX 23397 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST - July, 1995 TIGARD,OR.97223 Tigard Economic Development Committee, c/o Dept. of Community Development 12755 S.W. Burnham St. , Tigard, OR 97223 Phone (503) 639-4171 THE TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE IS INTERESTED IN HELPING YOU TO MAKE CONTACT WITH , THE GOVERNMENT ENTITIES AND UTILITIES WHICH YOU NEED TO COORDINATE WITH AS YOU BECOME A MEMBER OF THE TIGARD BUSINESS COMMUNITY. The Committee hopes that this list suits your needs. If you have further questions, please call the Department of Community Development at 639-4171. CITY OF TIGARD INFORMATION [ 3 LAND USE INFORMATION To obtain information about zoning, the Comprehensive Plan designation for your business location, uses allowed in your zone, division of ,property, or development standards, contact: Department of Community Development, Planning Division, City of Tigard, 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171. [ 3 BUILDING PERMIT To obtain a building permit for construction or alteration for your business, contact: Department of Community Development, Building Division, City of Tigard, 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171. [ 3 PUBLIC FACILITY AVAILABILITY To find out if public facilities such as sanitary sewers, storm drainage, or streets are adequate to serve the needs of your business, contact: Dept. of Community Development, Engineering Division, City ' of Tigard, 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171. [ 3 BUSINESS TAX Anyone doing business in the City on a temporary or permanent basis is required to pay a business tax annually. Included are all subcontractors, service providers, home occupations, and temporary uses. To find out if you need to pay a business tax to operate your business, contact: Business Tax Information, Finance Department, City of Tigard, 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171. [ ] SIGNS To obtain approval for a"new or altered sign for your business, contact: Department of Community Development Building Division. 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171. [ ] HOME OCCUPATION To find out if your proposed home occupation meets City criteria to obtain a permit, contact; Department of Community Development, Planning Division, 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223 (5C3) 639-4171. [ ] TEMPORARY USE Any business wishing to operate for a limited period of time or in a non-permanent structure requires a temporary use permit in addition to a Business Tax Receipt. For information, contact: Department of Community Developments, Planning Division, 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223 _(503) 639-4171. OTHER RESOURCE CONTACTS [ ] UTILITIES-ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS TELEPHONE CABLE TELEVISION SOLID WASTE Most of Tigard is served by the Tigard Water District. Some northern properties are served by the Metzger District. The Tigard Building Division can advise you as to which district to contact. To obtain information about the following utility services for your business, contact: WATER - Tigard Water District, 8841 SW Commercial St. , Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-1554. - Metzger Water District, 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd., Portland, OR 97223, (503) 245-3331 ELECTRICITY — Portland General Electric, Western Division Center, 14655 S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Rd., Beaverton, OR 97005 (503) 643-5454. NATURAL GAS - Northwest Natural Gas Company, 220 N.W. 22nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97209, (503) 226-4210. TELEPHONE General Telephone, 17855 N.W. Cornell Rd. , Beaverton, OR 97229 (503) 645-6454, CABLE TELEVISION - Storer Metro Cable, 14200 SW Brigadoon Ct., Beaverton, OR 97075, (503) 644-3188. SOLID WASTE - There are three providers of solid waste service in the City of Tigard. These providers operate under exclusive franchise with the City. For information on which provider serves your business, contact City of Tigard., 12755 SW Ash, Tigard, OR 97223. _(503) 639-4171. - [ ] FIRE PROTECTION Most of Tigard is within the Tualatin Rural Fire District's area, however, the northern portion is within Washington County Fire District #1. The Tigard Building Division can advise you as to which district to contact. To obtain information on minimum fire protection standards, contact: Washington County Fire District #1, 20665 SW Blanton, Aloha, OR 97007 (503) 649-8577. Tualatin Rural Fire District, P.O. Box 127, Tualatin, OR 97062 (503) 682-2601 [ ] ELECTRICAL PERMITS To obtain information on electrical safety and permits, contact: Oregon State Department of_Commerce, Building Codes Division, 2300 S.W. 6th Ave., Portland. OR 97201 (503) 229--5758. [ ] HEALTH CODE The Oregon Revised Health Code Standards for food service govern this area, for information, contact: Washington County Health and Sanitation Departments, Washington County Courthouse, Administration Building, 150 N. First, Hillsboro, OR 97123 t, (503) 640-3538. [ ] FOOD HANDLER'S PERMIT To hand food in your business, you and your employees must acquire a Food Handler's Permit from: Washington County Health and Sanitation Departments, Washington County Courthouse, Administration Building, 150 N. First, Hillsboro, OR 97123 (503) 640-3538. [ ] TRI-MET PAYROLL TAX To obtain information regarding the Tri-Met Payroll tax, contact: Collection Division, Department of Revenue, State of Oregon. 955 Center Revenue Building, Salem, OR 97310 (503) 378-3390 or Toll Free 1-900-452-7813. [ ] LIQUOR LICENSE To obtain a license to serve or sell alcoholic beverages at your business, contact: Oregon Liquor Control Commission, 217 Plaza Complex, Building Three, Suite "E". Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 229-6113. .F .. _ T [ ] LABOR LAWS To find out which labor ' laws affect your new business, including affirmative action, wage and hour- claims, working minors, employers' permits etc. , contacts Bureau of Labor and Industries Technical Assistance Unit, 555 13th Street, N.E., Salem, OR 97310 (503) 373-1435 or Toll Free: _ 1-900-452-7813, Ext. 1435. [ ] SAFETY REQUIREMENTS To assure that your business complies with employee safety requirements under the Oregon Safe Employment Act, contact: Accident Prevention Division, Oregon State Worker's Compensation, 10700 S.W. Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy. , Suite 414, Building 4, Beaverton, OR 97005 (503) 543-0100. [ ] STATE LICENSES AND PERMITS To obtain specific state professional licenses and permits to operate your business, contact: Economic [evelopment Department, Regulations Assistance Center, 155 Cottage Street, Salem, OR 97301 (503) 373-1234. OTHER IMPORTANT NUMBERS [ ] Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce, 12995 S.W. Pacific Hwy. , Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-1656. ( ] Tigard School District 23J, 13137 S.W. Pacific Hwy. , Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 620-1620. [ ] Beaverton School District 49, P.O. Box 200, Beaverton, OR 97075, (503) 649.0293. 1431P) {WAM:br/ v ffn MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council August 16, 1985 FROM: Elizabeth A. Newton, Senior Planner eafq SUBJECT: Annexation Activity for July 1985 On July 9, 1985 the Planning Commission considered a request by Scholls West, Inc. to annex 1.11 acres into the City. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend to City Council that the annextion request be forwarded to the Portland Metropolition Area local Government Boundary Commission for consideration. A copy of the Planning Commission minutes is attached. In addition, Kevin Perrin and Daniel Schenk filed a petition to annex .80 acres into the City. The property is located on SW North Dakota. (See attached map). This annexation request will be considered before the Planning Commission and City CouncilinAugust. (EAN:bs/1752P) .xF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION { REGULAR MEETING JULY 9, 1985 l i. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7;35 P.M. . The meeting was held at the Tigard School District Building — Conference Room — 13137 SW Pacific Highway. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Owens. Butler, Peterson, Campbell, Fyre, Bergmann. and Leverett. Absent: Commission Vanderwood. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES o President Moen noted two typographical errors. e Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to approve the minutes with corrections. Motion carried by majority of Commissioner present. Commissioners Fyre and Bergmann abstained. 4. , COMMISSION COMMUNICATION o Senior Planner Newton stated that Item 5.3, an annexation request by Russell Krueger, would be set over to the August 6th Planning Commission Hearing. o Comasissianer Owens commented she had stopped at Elmer's Pancake house and had talked with them about 'their denial and options for using temporary signs. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 7-85 CITY OF TIGARD Review of Volume I — Resource Document where it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge Ravine. Also, a review of the Tigard Flood plain and Wetlands Map as it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge Ravine. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for denial. She stated that Frank Currie, the Citic Engineer was available for any questions. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Mrs. Geraldine Ball, 11515 SW 91st, submitted and read into the record a letter (with maps) supporting changes to Volume I of the Comprehensive Plan. o Lou Christen, 17895 SW Shasta, Tualatin, stated that Red Rock Creek had never originated beyond I-5. It originated close to the OEA property. He supported. changing the document to reflect that Red Rock Creek originates on the west side of I-5. PLANKING COMMISSION MINUTES " July 9, 1905 Page 1 o Discussion followed regarding where Red Rock Creek originated. What change was being proposed to the plan. The difference between a waterway and a ravine, and why staff was recommending denial ,of any change. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: -o Consensus of the Commission was that the drainage for Red Rock Creek does originate on Mt. Sylvania, even though Red Rock Creek does not exist on the east side of I-5. Also Villa Ridge Ravine is not a waterway and should not be listed on Page 58 (Volume I) of the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to recommend that the next time the Comprehensive Plan is updated to modify the plan to state that "Red Rock Creek - located west of I-5, the fourth lar9est tributary of Fanno Creek, is fed from drainage flowing southwesterly. . . . .". Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 2-$5 ZC. 0-85 DAVIS NPO # 4 A request to assign Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to property to be annexed to the City of Tigard Senior Planner Newton reviewed the history explaining that City Council had approved the' annexation. Now the Commission needs to assign Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to the property being annexed. PUBLIC TESTIMONY Mrs. Geraldine Ball, 11515 SW 91st, representing NPO # 4, supported staff's recommendation as being most like the County's zoning. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Discussion followed regarding designating the property wetlands and why the lot number where different from the previous proposal. # Commissioner Bergmann moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward CP 8-85 to City Council recommending approval of staff's recommendation. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner's present. 5.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-85, ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 11-85 RUSSELL KRUEGER (request to annex 23.26 acre to Tigard) NPO # 7 Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to set CPA 9-85 and ZCA 11-85 over to the August 6, 1985, Planning Commissioner hearing. 5.4 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 10-85 SCHOLLS WEST BUILDING INC. NPO # 7 Request to annex 1.11 acre parcel into the City of Tigard. Also, A request to change the zoning on the property from Washington County MA 1 to City of Tigard IP. Located: 9730 SW Cascade Blvd. (WCTM 1S1 270D lot 100). PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July;9, 1985 Page 2 _ Senior Planner Newton explained that the building being annexed is the Tigard TimesBuilding. She recommended forwarding the request to ,City Council with a recommendation of approval. Discussion followed regarding the zoning. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED; o Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner Campbell seconded to forward ZCA 10-85 to City Council recommending approval of the annexation and changing the Zoning from Washington County MA 1 to City of Tigard IP (Industrial Park). Motion carried unanimously. mss.. 5.5 SUBDIVISION S 9-85 RUSSELL KRUEGER NPO # 7 Request to divide 14.91 acres into 86 lots. Located east side of SW 135th Avenue immediately north of Morning Hill subdivision (WCTM ISI 330C, lot number 302 and 500). Senior Plannei^ Liden reviewed the history, explaining that this site had originally been approved for a multi-family complex and now the developer was proposing a single family subdivision. Staff had received three comments, one from Washington County, they had no objection; one from NPO # 7. which had proposed through streets instead of the loop streets to provide for better access; and a letter from Mark A. Bowgren, who opposed f the development. Staff recommended approval with 18 conditions. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o RUSSELL KRUEGER, 3515 SW Baarbur Blvd. , Y-1, stated that he had already dedicated the required property to the City for the Park. He requested that conditions number 13 be removed. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Dale Miller, 13105 SW Falcon Rise, did not oppose the development but was concerned with drainage, the condition of 135th, and the dangerous intersection at 135th and Scholls Ferry Road. Discussion followed. o Robert Joy, 11735 SW 134th Terrace, generally favored the proposal, however, was concerned about keeping the residential character of the neighborhood. He did not want to see through street, just sufficient access. He also felt the intersection at 135th and Scholls Ferry should be resolved prior to any more approvals for development along 135th. o Senior planner l.iden stated that a LID for 135th had been attempted but_did not materialize, however, there will be 'a asphalt overlay to be done in conjunction with Winter Lake II. . o Dick Bancroft, 140 ' NE 3rd, Hillsboro, Consulting Engineer for the project was available for questions. ''PLANNNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 9, 1985 page 3 S .1 35 AC Ti Z� 9000 f; .2B AC. W I a a 000 'ry104.73 25 6900 r loo sss. ao .!6 Ac. 1. va0s 8200 7800 c� 13F00 8400 a 20 Ac .2i AC. tb .57 AC. .BO Ac Me To „ e o.a 8800 $ 8100 7900 c is /T Ac r64 e .20 AC � /9 AC 2 N ' SEE MA ss sos IS 1 350 Ts ro 8000 w 8700 u $500 8300 0 0 t .20AC.25-71 •. 92A0 !4.Od� t3 90'9 cn 01 1 .4 A40 i00 77 200 TOIs et.la60 SOU1N ttNE O�VIO JlLIC Soo/ NORTH 1I JOHN ego TO PUBLIC 4014a t AA7JA7�fJr11n biaaaiai I tl.e i -lei.e i0' N !e• 54'ti .:. i.9J.. too.so •I,1 1 as N !e st s INITIAL POINT zo a3o 2200 INITia ( 2300 Po1Nz 4300 n2Q0 0 D 500 7600 �+ 16 •0. 1 1 iJ s+ 16 w { fl a.. T 6 $ J !i.! -� r� I S I:a.11 N t!•2L'E S 30 ' {4 + Ltd r _ 3.a, n 24 Oo N 2100 /1 >t 2 • > 4101 » . 2 5 X7301% . w 15 Issz as i les* e 7200L p a � se I r I se.S `moi. lii.Is 12 4400 i I:T ID�.2T 3 41002500 Cli 2000 « i4 0 3 71019 4 �+ n R ~ 0140 111111s.90 5510 �_ :c 4500 4 3 Lao4000 : ' at, Re w 329.2 A 2 v I es.t ✓'� C « 13 N 2601 l e.a �--I AL' j INITIAL. 4601 C.%jft-, 1 „ 5400 r 5 x N ee•s4•E� w w • 3900 ►a. aea g 196.9 `� {2 2604 2603 =o 111110,a^'- + hV .9/A6 + 26 Ac. 4600 200.03 5300 i o 6 3800M ages l's I ' 2s>?ZR n I I 2700^ No {900 AM MEMORANDUM �T TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CO!"MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE, August 2. 1985 SUBJECT: Monthly Report for month of July - Building Division July's building activities include permits for 4 Signs, 27 Single Family Residential, 7 Residential alter/repair, 2 Commercial, 9 Commercial alter/repair, 1 Multi-Family (6 units), 1 Garage, 2 Pole Bldgs. , 1 Swimming Pool, 2 Re-roofing and 2 Fill for a total valuation of $4,232,000,00. King City Activity 1 Commerical alter/repair, for a total valuation of $15,000.00. Fees' for 54 permits $16.071.00 Fees for 49 Plan Checks 5,089.10 Fees for 4 signs 100.00 { Plumbing Acitivity 31 3,515.00 Mechanical Activity - 22 445.00 TOTAL. . . . . . .$ 25,220.60 Sewer Connections - 28 $ 33,450.00 Sewer Inspections - 29 $ 1.025.00 (CZ/0076P) to o $ $ SoS$ $ o $ $ $ 0 $ $ $ P . C!. 0 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 9 — C' $ � � � $ � $ � 080 § 0 $ 025 � � 0 0000000g0o$ 0 $ 0000000 0 0 ¢ O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O _ J � n00C+ o+ D+ � < �-+ m mNwO .+ C+ 0Iz0sr W mOOr W O o � ¢ to t an tt! b It! Q. b. to tp tD t0 t0 to tD t0 to tD to Q LO to UN r\ W 0 N T ..•t r--t .•-�r-t w--7 r-t r-t r� r-i r-t e-•t r--t e•-� 1-4 r-r r-4 •-d r-4 r 4 r.4 —t r-•t r4 ^+ r-t r-t •4 r•-/ r-4 -4 r-4 r-4 r•d 1E f1S P6 fd -rt .. f6 f6 (6 fd f8 f6 fe (6 fo is A if$ a f6 R3 M rd rd f6 fe (d fd •+ 0 (f) rd (d flf isRf •to -4 •� •f d •,.t.r t .r .,.t •,, .H •,r .r t .ra .,� .r a .ra •r+ ..+ .t -4 -4 .14 .14 -4 .'+ E ..+ •.+ ..+ ..+ ..+ +a ++ +a +J +1 4.) 4J +J +a 4-) +J 4J +a -P 4J +J +, -0 4-) y •++ .N ++ ++ +•t 4-A +d M ++ +J +•t .f.� +j Ln W C c C C C c C C C C C C C C C C C c C C C C C C C C C LL. C C C C C co a. aacfaaaa aaaaa 'aaafaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa a+ �- v v n'v -a v'a -e 'a v -o -o -ra -v � -o 'a v v • r.t h rna•rn+ •rna•rn+ •.nt .rnt,.ny •rn+ •.n+ ..nt •rnt A . . . . . . • 4 v . -da --rto +i -.eA •v -r4 -4 •r4 r{ n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n r+ n 0 in 0 n a a a a a a 41 41 a CO a a a a Of Of Of a Of a a a a of a a a :3 a a a a a >- axaO: 0:ix txw0: 0: 0: rafl' rXtzrx � fYtrrr <Y0. atYtx � f]C � fl" c>: w J h 0 Y h H H � h at � a a ^ V L ¢ 40 -W -V O T a BOO TSO a aO •L) a a -V I a a a rs =1v 411 co h o +t a a .0 a a u > C c Y .2c 7 a c 0 v a �c i L of fo •r+ re a -o a a c v- C a a Z ,.. at nS U () i .-4 L J H a r^+ a a a r+ 41 to 0 a > L a L U m O ¢ a L L > .i U .r a > ¢ u ., p.r 4 U L L L f8 •r+ 4-) +J .r+ U U Q d-t .r+ L -4 fff i- 4- tF a s as at 0X C as 4-1s 000 4- crass a C•s a p v- O s E +•+ O.+4 CL C 4J +' s L ++ --4 U +1 (►- 0 0 s U ++ E a L L E E w t1 O 0.s c 0% C+ m +1 O O+ E L 'O C m a C C 41 -a L +tf E at .+ m E J (n fecOoN QL) U0f� 0 0 .N+ cc (A 0Jt O Z, Q U) 0 0 � OSS (A V-4N H 3W33333 3w 3333.3333Um ¢ 33 �` �` 3 ® U33333 O (n cn3 (nfncncnVi U) fA0) (nU) 00 <nu� 3v3is3nw033rn � � fncr� fn (nV) CQ W m (l7to00% 00 toOOOanOtnsntoO On to to toto0to0 w WOtn0toWC+ N0 -' O %Cfl, mw0mmOtoW %D 0 0 0 0 0 0 M w M -4 O to W w Ch Q O N N -I N .+ -4 .-t f- .•t r+ t0 ••a N W .-•i 0 w N .-t to +w t0 O m n ON .+ p O .+ mto0t0 %00 t00v -4 -4 -40m0 •+ C+ 0to -+ .-+ Nmsr0m0 -tOOa N � ¢ r4 W .-t H .-i H .-+ •-t W .+ r+ .+ rr H ,-t .-+ r+ ^ W w -4 .+ w w .� W p► .-t .r .•d OC � T H F.. E f O O V c +•t .rr a U V C 4J rd O , J O E u U Lof •rra S] O 0 s C •r+ .,. r m is 4 4Jto yt n O U 1 i 0 L L 7 C L .� L 4J O at L a T a a a a of 0 n Cl s a 3 p U O y 3 n a O L L a o E E L L E 3 L L L a Q. i L S. O n t n n .• .+ U a a o n o o a a o a s arz ' o o a a a a nU +1 •a U a L r-r a 401.4 r+ .+ L •ra S S •-+ r+ x is .-1 Z, a L L L > !, r-t 0..-+ L 3 fd n .-. -+ 0. L .+ C .-+ . t •,+ .r .tZ d D- rt ..+ r+ •r+ a Is r6 .+ CO > L •.+ .,.t E E .ra ..r E fd •.+ .r4 fY a L •.+ •.+ ..a +1 w --moocam°' rs oE � rr; hE1: (d-a_c C � � � fe %a ffaaxp h 4j fa c •.+ 4J fE s 4J s L s C t16 (E W) Ts > La n E -ON C4J n TE •4 :P% :3 U C ++ 4J E >tT (6 �C 4 • a •.r AS O is O ftl •+ O rd 7 (d O fS L ff3 (d 0 •4 0 -r+ •r+ 0 Id ra L •.+ O 3 !- ►ar-f aJ F- F� 1- OJUf'lF- J � f P-1, w1: 0F- F- i- P-4t-� (z SSSSSSSSSSS SSS ¢ . OO ¢ O gSSSB $ 88.8g $ zz $ 8g S o O O o ¢ 0 %0.00 %0Mto0N00Ln0 %0NU) t11m O J W ti ¢ e a � cc rx rx ¢ ¢ ¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ 1-4 o o .+ ..+ to as to tts ftf M 16 Ln w c cuvuuuuuuuuuaaa� cg+ � I M O. a 0 L L L L i L L L L L L Sr 0a a .-� •o v a a a a a at aE a@ a a a t6 ra rn E • t aaop 0p0 0p 0qpp ++ +s �+ �+ 300 0 ? rxrcVUt� racOivUVUUUOrnt7ww (Amm s- J ' i r F- c� H co V in tJ m N m ft GO t� a 7 16ate+ 7 Z in C C C ""' b N d •0 ray Y -t C 'a ua, � � a 0 ' cc 0m o o 18 t..t a srf ¢ •.+ vs ¢ c ¢ c s c ¢ •4 a o ..r 4- O a C 0 FS fts s L L L E G t ,_ « C •0J, s •gi 0 .NT roe C -t•+ .0M r6 nbs 16 0"s+ u •.+ c 0.+s a s C 0 c a m w C 4 m N t0 N C- to tt3 L E N L A .-+ C cu L h t t9z �oha h = �oc? C7 = h0 � '•' ix. 0. H 3 O N N N i�l1 N 3 (31/ N N N W N W N w ttT uta O an 0 .d O LO O O O +O O O tY %O Nh .+ mtlht» mtn0o00N! Q0 O OoZo D Q 0 %o DQOO oj CQ ..i .•0 ri r+ 4r1 .4 %D Q% ri CX H L) 4J 4J U.AjV L L CM cv 4J m an m 0 0 aS O L u a vCX L 0 o so. a sE + c ss y O c -0 C) J 3 +j + U t f6 C 4J 4J rt i s u u a �. .+ a at to » c c c ass o C m sn rn V p• ..+ ae .d J C S a C H w 7 rE •.+ O O B -p O £ ui CI a C7 H 3 0 a 'O W pW S S U f�6 f6 C C 0% In ..a .rt ..+ L •.4 c t!f i t6 RS s i s (6 16 '0 3 O O i r m g3 ¢ oaJF- E- Vitx0- :r •- OGAT SF- F- z� , ��z KING CITY BUILDING ACTIVITY — JULY 1985 CONTRACTOR ADDRESS TYPE VALUATION Dean Smith 11711 SW Queen Elizabeth Commercial A/R 15,000.00 Total 15,000.00 t +i S I G N P ER M I T S JULY 1985 CONTRACTOR ADDRESS VALUATION Armature Coil Co. 8965 SW Burnham St. NA; Emlers 14055_SW Pacific Hwy. NA China Cloud Traders' 11225 SW Greenburg 2,000.00 Martin Bros. Signs 11640 SW Pacific Hwy. 2,900.00 Total $4,900.00 (CZ/0076P) i COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY CALENDAR YEAR 1985 POTENTIAL VALUATION SQ FOOT MONTH APPLICANT USE ADDRESS JANUARY NONE. FEBRUARY FEB. 85 Robinson Deva Comm. Building 7300 SW Hunziker 120,000.00 10.798 MARCH MAR. 85 Western Intern. Comm. Building -7405 SW Tech Center Dr. 530,000,00 32,884 MAR. 85 Wester Intern. Comm. Building 7495 SW Tech Center Dr. 530,000.00 32,884 APRIL APR. 85 Bob Hudson Comm. Building 12950 SW Pacific Hwy. 371,000.00 17,800 APR.': 85 Utility Equp, Storage 12805 SW 77th 21,000.00 3,960 MAY MAY 85 General Tele. Equipment Bldg. 10000 SW Cascade Blvd. 38,000.00 988 JUNE JUNE 85 City of Tigard Civic Center 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 1,700,000.00 31,333 ,JULY 85 Wilmeck Co. Comm. Bldg. 12770 SW 68th Avenue 1,850,000.00 56,000 JULY 85 Andre Nadeau Comma Bldg. 15785 SW 72nd Avenue 25,000.00 9,076 (cz/0590P) z _ CODE ENFORCEMENT - JULY 1985 CATEGORY LETTERS COMPLETED PENDING TIME NO. OF COMPLAINTS Noxious Vegetation 10 78 2 7 2 Nr. Animals 2 2 0 1 10 mins. Open Storage of Junk 2 1 1 30 mins. !. Barkdust 1 0 1 0 15 mins. Living quarters 1 1 0 1 10 mins. Temporary Use 0 -1 0 10 mins. Sign 4 0 A 0 20 mins. Fireworks Stands 2 0 2 0 10 mins. Used Cars 3 0 3 0 15 mins. Noise 2 0 1 1 15 mins. Fill ` 2 0 2 0 10 mins. Skateboard 1 0 0 1 Sent to P.D. Misc. 18 Hr. Secretarys Time CODE ENFORECMENT MONTHLY SUMMARY JUNE 1985 4 I. New Cases Number 1985 Abandoned Buildings 1' Business Tax & Home Occupation 7 Dog's & Other Animals 2 Noxious Vegetation 25 Zoning Violation O Junk & Rubbish 5 Hazards e Signs 18 Miscellaneous 25 TI. Phone/Personal Contacts 63 + 83 Letters 14 Site Visits 176 Notice Posted 3 Code Enforcement Violations Posted 5 (1615P) f � z TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES — July 16, 1985 { Pioneer Pies Restaurant Members Present: Pat Kennedy, Vice Chairman Kathy Budny David Clements Jim Corliss Tony Orlandini _John Savory Guest Present: Jeanne Caswell Sue Clark Doug McCasline Dee Dee Harrington Staff Present: Bill Monahan Pat Kennedy, acting chairman, opened the meeting by calling for a review of the June 18, 1985 meeting minutes. The members approved the minutes as written. The election of officers was delayed until August. The Committee reviewed the Economic Development checklist which lists the various governmental agencies and utilities which are of interest to property owners and developers. The list was suggested several months ago by Pat. John suggested. that a small supply be distributed now for use, and following feedback, either the checklist could be modified or a full printing could take place. John suggested that the Chamber may be able to assist in distribution by including the checklist within its information packet. The Committee discussed the checklist in terms of the Committee role. Pat felt that the checklist will project the Committee's desire to be helpful to the people.. John saw the role of the Committee as also being facilitators to assist developers to lessen delays and to complete their projects faster. The Committee will meet with the City Council in a workshop setting on Monday, August 19, 1985 at 7:30 P.M. The focus of the workshop will be on the role of the Committee, the downtown survey, the action plan for 1985-86, and Committee activities for the past year. Bill will tabulate the surveys prior to the next meeting. The format of the survey is open ended, so tabulation will not be simple. Each member will receive a copy of the completed surveys so that they may fully evaluate the responses. No developers were present to discuss their property. The Committee asked for an upda':e of. the status of the Main Street Development. Bill reported that Costco has broken ground outside of Tigard in Washington County. Main Street Development is now pursuing alternative tenants. John suggested that the Committee could assist to determine if other tenants are interested in the property. - other Business — Jeanne suggested that the Committee may wish to meet with the Transportation Committee to discuss issues of mutual concern. Most large .. projects involve issues related to both Economic Development and Transportation. Doug McCasline, director of the Tualatin Valley Economic Development Corporationwas present to invite members to the TVEDC annual meeting. He explained that TVEDC has an economic and development profile of. Tigard as well as the other cities in the area. Information is provided to prospects as they express- interest. He explained that the thrustofthe organization has not changed. TVEDC is now acting as a consultant to Washington County to: (1) Develop an overall economic development plan, (2) Develop a guide on how to do business in the County, (3) Update and enhance an inventory of available sites, and (4) Develop a business contact strategy. Doug stated that he will use our checklist and perhaps develop an area-wide checklist. He 'pointed out that TVEDC has moved offices to 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive in Beaverton. Jeanne presented a request by the Economic Development Department that local communities prepare photo files. TVEDC has one and is also having a video cassette prepared by. Pacific University. TVEDC will have a resource center and library for public use. Jeanne suggested that Tigard put together a pictorial 'program, perhapsworking with Storer. Tony suggested that the 4 Comittee discuss . the project in August. Doug < suggested - that Pacific University or PGE may be willing to assist the City. The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, August 20, 1985 at 7:30 A.M. at Pioneer Pies. v .b 4 �Y f yM Y MEMORANDUM ( CITY OF TIGARD TO: William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development rr� FROM: Randy Clarno, Engineering Services Manager f/ DATE: August 12, 1985 (� SUBJECT: Engineering Monthly Report for July, 1985 Function Personnel Time in Function July I. Private Development Services A. Land-Use Application review . . 3% B. Improvement Permits (Subvd., half-street, sewer & Delg. projects 32% C. Public/Agency assistance 10% D. Property Vacations . . 1% ( II. Geographic Information Services A. Mapping and Records . . . 4X B. Survey and Design 1. P.W. Maint. Projects . . . 0% 2. City Wide Control 7% 3. Capital Project Engineering . . . 0% III.Capital Development Services A. Public Fac. Master Plan review and update 0% B. C.I.P. and L.I.D. Admin. assistance 4% C. Street C.I.P. assistance. 1% t _IV. General Admin. 6 Misc. Personnel Reviews, training, staff meetings, Citizen committee support, Section management, Budget prep., union meetings, Computer Master Plan, etc.... • • • • . . • . . • . • 19% ,. V. Non-productivetime (Holidays, vacations, sick leave, etc. 19% VI.Revenue Activity FY 85-86 FY 84-85 A. Engineering Service Fees & Charges July July 1. Improvement Permits (I.B) 1,647.72 80.00 thru July thru July 1,647.72 80.00 B. Public Works Operations Fees 6 Charges FY 85-86 FY 84-85 July July 1. Streetlights . . . . . . . 0 0 2. Traffic control Signing 0 0 thru July thru July 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 (RC:pm/0840P) f` r PUBLIC WORKS OPERATION FUEL USED For Month of : July 1985 DATE: 8/6/85 Gallons - Monthly UzinR Dept. Gallons X yr-to-date $ Amount Account Number PWWW 197.9 09 19 7.9 10-21200-611 PWST 251 . 3 , 11 251. 3 10-21.300-611 PWSS 12 .0 00 12 .0 10-21500-611 PWP 144. 6 06 144 . 6 10-21400-611 ADM 32 . 7 01f 32 . 7 i0.32000-611 ENG. 80. 7 03 80. 7 10-?2400-611 BLDG 113. 5 05 113. 5 10„22200-611 PD 1 ,219 .5 561 1 ,219 .5 10-11200-611 PD 102. 0 04 102 .0 10-11300-611 P.W. Admin. 10.21100-611 Fin. S Serv. 12 . 0 00 12 .0 10-12100-611 Municipal Ct 10-13000-611 Plan. 5 Dev.' 1 . 7 00: A.9 10-22300-611 Mayor 6 Coun. 6. 9 00 10-31000-611 . 8 00 10-12300-611 City Record !r - Civic Center .2 00 . 2 TOTAL 2 , 175 . 8 Average cost per gallon ; $1. 139 CC:• Frank Currie GALLONS IN: 3.323.0 - Jerry McNurlin Capt. Jennings GALLONS OUT:_(I_,.175 . 8) Cpl. Meyers Finance NET: i PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS Month of July 1985 Date, 8/7/85 MaLntenance Report YEAR TO DATE CURRENT MONTH ( Jul) PWO PD TOTAL Plt0 PD TOTAL '- 35 .08 Oil 10.96 24 . 12 35 .08 Tires 364.00 364 .00 364 .00 364 .00 Maint. Labor Haint. 20.9 20.95 20.95 20:95 Parts t Repair Labor Repair 609.42 474 . 811 ,084 .23 609.42 474 .81 1,084.23 Parts --6—utaide 282 .59 r 1 ,187.2 9'5 .3 1,282 .59 1 , 187.24 95 .35 1 Re FUEL 1 ,008. 311 ,505 .2 2 ,513.51 1 008. 31 11505.20 2 513.51 TOTAL ' 3.464 .9 ,4$4.4 5 ,949 . 36 3,464 .93 2 ,484 .43 5 949 . 36 CC: Frank Currie Jerry McNurlin Lt. Wheeler C-apt . Jennings v MONTHLY REPORT CITY®F TIOA WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON DATE. Aug 1 , 1985 FOR MONTH OF: July 1985 OPERATIONS OFFICE: 2 .0 hrs T.V. Inspection WASTE WATER: 2.1.2 2.0 hrs -T.V. Inspection 112 .5 hrs Sanitary Sewer Clean 80.0 hrs Sanitary Repairs 67.5 hrs Catch Basin Maintenance 177. 75 hrs Manhole Repairs' 4.0 hrs Storm Drain Repairs STREETS 2.1.3 64.5 hrs Street Cleaning 33.0 hrs Patching 1 .0 hr Painting & Street Marking 122.5 hrs Sign Maintenance 126.0 hrs Brushing Limbiug 1.0 hr Grading Rocking 32 .0 hrs additional Community Service Labor PARKS 2.1.4 GREEN THUMB LABOR 70. 5 hrs Mowing 66.5 hrs Mowing 201.5 hrs Irrigation 52 .0 hrs Irrigation 72.0 hrs Restroom Maint. 24 .0 hrs Restroom Maint . 15 .5 hrs Ballfield Maint. 4. 0 hrs Ballfield Maint. 5 .0 hrs Building Maint . 3. 0 hrs Building Maint. 15 .0 hrs Trails Maint . .5 hrs Landscaping 52 .0 hrs Construction 65 .5 hrs Community Service labor SUPPORT SERVICES 2.1.5 8.5 hrs P .M. on Equipment 148.5 hrs Sched. ` Repairs 15 .5 hrs Unsched. Repairs 29.5 hrs Fabrication 22 .0 hrs General Support ON 97223 PH;639-4171 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREG COMMUNITY SERVICE VOLUNTEER WORKERS f Washington County Corrections For the Month of: July , 1985 f< City of Tigard NAME Hrs Ordered Hrs Worked Aaron Carson 80 7.0 Scott Bean 50 50.0 Eric Johnson 16 16.0 Bill Kirschner 22 .0 Green Thumb Labor: Mary Mosely y 80.0 Walter VanTuyl 83.0 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICE hours 95 .0 TOTAL GREEN THUMB hours 163.0 - h C y 00 col P M O N J 'n N h N ,p M coh b rn en 'nO p l O O O co V% •'. M V1 en d : n W 1 M i M N b b N N m Y M tl tl u d A Y oa w M to O 0..0 za N co N O Fj +1 'A P U1 b C46u aW 0 t N b J P4 w -, a .0 W R G 4 as AG O a w ,a a .. i.1 ~ V H 2 y Z a W H n�a <w P O N co !'•1 J V1I N CO DD b N 00 h 0o P •"� h '•C 0 M N h V1 J P M h ill h .r N b V1 OO h' W L . • •r M V1' M .+ M M N .r O V C Y tl N b CD, co V1 V1 b •'.� M J P b h b .+ h N Vn M ►+ O ] O LC t V d > M N J N O P ^+ J O J J J J N � G• yx aD .r ..a O O co � P h N P O N x H x 'n 00 J M N b N O N J O O O P N P Oo O b J ^+ 00 F Tri M •+ V> b •'+ M M I11 b b In �'• N J h 03 t'O N M h h O M .-� N V1 O Yb h J N 00 O b V'1 N M h J ti b N W.,u P N O O b M O +'• N N O b b ^� O b O O N h co d V1 h P e+7 O P CO J h 6C7 O V1 P 00 J N b N P h J V1 N Vl 00 h H14 h 0 b O O M PN CO bb V'1 P V1wOb J wl b P P O M bOo N b N P ^ J J N00 h Ln to N 00 O b •-1 N O '. ..1.-1 Y•-1 �� P V1 O V1 J !� V1 O V1 J M 0 tl "4 Y'1 V1 V1 ^+ N M 00 V1 b LM .� b N( M M w v r, Lnco p� P b co CO h Y O P 0. P Y O N N 0 0 O S 'D b h h h > h .r h6 r. Co. R b CO P.1• A P O NYP Y Y 7 �Y O'O P O OA \ • Yh h W�,h 000 C �J v Y O W O 0 P OI .P ..�P M •-b .r • • •A ! r •N A • y • z Y~ r+ • Y Y! !! �O •O ,t O • Ya uA Y MH Y tl YO Y I'• V S K N 7 1cr• Yp Ys !, Y M 00 L V Y YY N C u > N ► '•M ■ f ) .•AI V N 7 (•> !Y Y s Y Y ! w 9 6> u V Y > Y•1 JI Y Y a Y r Y •• Y •Y ,a Y ■ A Y Y Y Y Y .+Y Y Y • Y Y Y Y •Y 6 Y ! Y Y C Y O • Y Y • Y • •O A] B •t ■O .O N O A O A O L M t !S Y !C •0 7.O • O H o,�u � u w�Y,�r. u �u v � .�v � -4 u „4 u ��•• C y V U 2 '1 1 V.r',. u V�. uo u u u0 uo ug Oo u n o o 0 0 0 0 0 bo o o 0 0 0 0 ' 100 c to co o b co, J b b b i. co NIcM It N N T vl . h M n CO M N i c �, ► O q � oa � 4 q q a a 4 aG a en Q. Y 4 j 1 A q s-3 O[ v1 M A A 14 a w U W � a 1 w F I F� Z 6w «i W M S OJ-1 ! w N N f l > 4 O Y O M t/1 70 M I FF V. ' U coM M M i 1 F � 1 Z U In N O O 96 N S S q d n o F S Y F1 .p h d) O 01 u O n M n C Y 4OO O J W N 13'0 W O 4 . e mO q Y H M O O O O T O ##FF y A N 1 1 1 1 M m M N 1 ca w v m 4 M N Y Y N "'�C n - — O. V1 co m OD O O.Ij Y Y 1+ S 2 O Y Y F •-w • C V •4 4. •:1 •y Y Y V (y dt Y ,= tl •A •Y Y .9. 7 p •� W 8 • Y Y Y a Y • Y Y 4 Y a p F 6 � p YN Y6' YYY Yb + > .1> U rl t • 44 4 4 4 •u 4 Y •V Y Nt YM 3 H 7` iV .061 R. .-1 4 W T n Ta >n T Al.e i V o O o V O V O 0 o uo Vo u0 J N 04 ••" J co 00 00 J co cn -' C4 N h J N N O HNM1 O, N N 7 O O VN ~ ID Y a O04 M R.o ~ a a - .o w CD .n �n O� m oY4 ap. Ln ? c O A ro xa rn ., a F w pt N c s r d J J o s a la w se o a . u T W O O n < H 10 Z F N N9 L 43 C-4 Z V1 o ta r4 O „� u Y h J ..• In 0 O• W I` V e .. n In o " a J " s I H O J J N M V I • O Ln h V1 co 4 O. N J N P .hy O O O O � .r O N F• 5 00 c a a x Z ti O N N i•1 M1 � N lo p Y V1 U1 O. 4D O• N Y w 40 t+1 N � tn coJ h to .r N .•r M1 h OJN �O Y .r J h N Ln H ? N N (f 00 u •O M O `C co N N Z6 Ln •h y.d J .+ 07 W m R.O w O N O M C, h J J O .D 6N'. r- ... N h O Ln h O N h � N co � J O t•1 M Y J . py J H J N M § cc O .r CO co co m N N mo lo .' O • 00 N .+ co f- �0-4 H enO pp J .� J r- 0 N y '0 N N N W V' 4 c4 h M .o N O N ^. f+1 N rl co Yco Y co m M V Y V fA J Y � O P•h �� O G Y O• Y Y � Y O p O N lo M ®. O C M Y s Y¢ Y Y Y s Y Y Y V co V w > �rw >N> ~ Y� Y MY QL OF o C V .1> > M > �I V V.1 Y.�Y .I i ^�> r• Y V p V V V MY .y M .IC Oi LY HV O Y O Y O i W A Oi YV YV hV MT. YS hS YV hV MM < •-I•,,,.-1 N rl rYo O X ."�••, T N TN TN iN O r -� '.p. TN TO uN u N P"O V^ uN uN u iTIN �� V V V V w V V N .O co co a '_ co O co co .O W co J _ - TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION v REGULAR MEETING JULY 9, 1985 1.-' President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. . The meeting was held at the Tigard School District Building Conference Room - 13137 SW Pacific Highway. 2. -ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen Commissioners Owens, Butler, Peterson, Campbell, Fyre, Bergmann. and Leverett. Absent: Commission Vanderwood. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES o President Moen noted two typographical errors. * Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to ' approve the minutes with corrections. Motion carried by majority of Commissioner present. Commissioners Fyre and Bergmann abstained, 4. COMMISSION COMMUNICATION o Senior Planner Newton stated that Item 5.3, an annexation request by Russell Krueger, would be set over to the August 6th Planning Commission Bearing. o Commissioner Owens commented she had stopped at Elmer's Pancake house € and had talked with them about their denial and options for using temporary signs. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 7-85 CITY OF TIGARD Review of Volume I - Resource Document where it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge Ravine. Also, a review of the Tigard Flood plain and Wetlands Map as it pertains to Red Rock Creek and the Villa Ridge Ravine. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for denial. She stated that Frank Currie, the City Engineer was available for any questions. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Mrs. Geraldine Ball, 11515 SW 91st, submitted and read into the record a letter (with maps) supporting changes to Volume I of the Comprehensive Plan. a Lou Christen, 17895 SW Shasta, Tualatin, stated that Red Rock Creek had never originated beyond I-S. it originated close to the OEA property. He supported changing the document to reflect that Red Rock Creek originates on the west side of I-5. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 9, 1985 Page 1 mom R or Discussion followed regarding where Red Rock Creek originated What change was being proposed to the plan. The difference between a waterway and a ravine, and why staff was recommending denial of any change. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED; o _ Consensus of the Commission was that the drainage for Red Rock Creek does originate on Mt. Sylvania, even 'though Red Rock Creek does not exist on the east side of 1-5. Also Villa Ridge Ravine is not a waterway and should not be listed on Page 58 (volume I) of the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to recommend that the next time the Comprehensive Plan is updated to modify the plan to state that "Red Rock Creek - located west of I-5, the fourth largest V utary of Fanno Creek, is fed from drainage flowing southe . . �o Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 2-85 ZC 8-85 DAVIS NPO # 4 A request to assign Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to property to be annexed to the City of Tigard. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the history explaining that City Council had approved the annexation. Now the Commission needs to assign Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to the property being annexed. l PUBLIC TESTIMONY Mrs. Geraldine Ball, 11515 SW 91st, representing NPO # 4, supported staff's recommendation as being most like the County's zoning. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Discussion followed regarding designating the property wetlands and why the lot number where different from the previous proposal. Commissioner Bergmann moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward CP 8-85 to City Council recommending approval of staff's recommendation. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner's present. 5.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-85, ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 11-85 RUSSELL KRUEGER (request to annex 23.26 acre to Tigard) NPO # 7 Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to set CPA 9-85 and ZCA 11-85 over to the August 6, 1985, Planning Commissioner hearing. 5.4 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 10-85 SCROLLS WEST BUILDING INC. NPO # 7 Request to annex 1.11 acre parcel into the City of Tigard. Also, A requesttochange the zoning on the property from Washington County MA 1 to City of Tigard IP. Located: 9730 SW Cascade Blvd. (WCTM iS1 2700 lot 100). PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 9, 1985 Page 2 SeniorPlannerNewton explained that the building being annexed is the Tigard Times Building. She recommended forwarding the request to City Council with a recommendation of approval. Discussion followed regarding the zoning PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: o Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner Campbell seconded to - forward ZCA 10-85 to City Council recommending approval of the annexation and changing the Zoning from Washington County MA 1 to City of Tigard IP (Industrial Park). Motion carried unanimously. 5.5 SUBDIVISION S 9-85 RUSSELL KRUEGER NPO # 7 Request to divide 14.91 acres into 86 lots. Located east side of SW 135th Avenue immediately north of Morning Hill subdivision (WCTM Il! 33DC, lot number 302 and 500) Senior Planner Liden reviewed the history, explaining that this site had originally been_approved for a` multi—family complex and now the developer was proposing a single family >subdivision. Staff had receved three comments, one from Washington County, they had no objection; one from NPO #. 7, which had proposed through streets instead of the loop streets to provide for better access; and_a letter from Mark A. Bowgren, who opposed the development. Staff recommended approval with 18 conditions. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o RUSSELL KRUEGER, 3515 SW Barbur Blvd., Y-1, stated that he had already dedicated the required property to the City for the Park. He requested that conditions number 13 be removed. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Dale Miller, 13105 SW Falcon Rise, did not oppose the development but was concerned with drainage, the condition of 135th, and the dangerous intersection at 135th and Scholls Ferry Road. Discussion followed. o - Robert Joy, 11735 SW 134th Terrace, generally favored the proposal, however, was concerned about keeping the residential character of the neighborhood. He did not want to see through street, just sufficient access. He also felt the intersection at 135th and Scholls Ferry should be resolved prior to any more approvals for development along 135th. o Senior Planner Liden stated that a LID for 135th had been attempted but did not materialize, however, there will be a asphalt overlay to be done in conjunction with Winter Lake II. . o Dick Bancroft, 140 NE 3rd, Hillsboro, Consulting Engineer for the project was available for questions. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 9, 1985 -Page 3 PUBLfG;HEARING CLOSED o Discussion followed regarding realignment of Penn Court. * Commissioner Leverett moved and Commissioner Fyre seconded to approve S 10-85 based on staff's findings and conclusions including staff's conditions, adding condition number 10. That access for lots 2 and 11 will be an Penn Court. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner present. 5.7 SUBDIVISION S 11-85 SAYLOR / WELCH / KUCHERA NPO # 7 Request to divide 16.64 acres into 84 lots of 4,500 to 14,250 square feet in four phases. The property is zoned R-7 (PD) (Residential, 7 units/acre, Planned Development) Located: Summer Lake Development, south of Scholls Ferry Road, east of Summer Lake Drive, and west of the North Dakota Street extension. Senior Planner Liden reviewed the history of the project. He asked that condition number 9 be deleted as it does not apply to the PD. Staff recommended approval with 16 conditions. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Mel Stout, David Evans and Assoc., 2626 SW Corbett, 97201, reviewed four maps they had submitted showing the previous, existing, and proposed subdivision. He concurred with staff to delete conditions number 9. They opposed conditions #- 10 and_ # 11, because ofthe development of the Meadowcreek Apartment, they felt the status of Springwood Drive should be changed to a local street instead of the minor collector, they were willing to compromise with a 55 foot width with parking on one side of the street. On condition number 14 they opposed the common driveway as it would make it difficult to sell the homes. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Discussion followed regarding the width requirement for SW Springwood Drive, parking on one side of the street, the common driveways, the conditions required from the PD approval and landscaped islands. Commissioner Bulter moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to approve S 11-85 based on staff's findings and conclusions, deleting condition number 9; deleting the last sentence in condition number 14; modify condition number 16 to delete conditions 5, 6, 12, 14, and delete "(deleting `them within the cul-de--sac)" in condition number 7 from the conditions of ZCPD 28-77. Motion carried by majority vote of Commissioners present. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 9, 1985 Page 5 6. OTHER BUSINESS o Commissioner Fyre, representative for the Transportation 'Committee, brought up discussion regarding 135th and Scholls Ferry Road intersections. Discussion followed. Consensus of the Commissioner was that these roads and intersections needed to be resolved, otherwise the Commissioner was concerned about given more approvals Commissioner Fyre was directed to compose a resolution stating the Planning Commission position. 7. ADJOURNMENT 10:40 PM ce w Diane M. Jelderks, ecretary L ATTEST A. Donald Moen. President 1595P „t dm j PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 9, 1985 Page 6 TIGARD TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE s,. Minutes of August 1, 1985 meeting PRESENT: Members: Tom Sullivan, (Chair), Mark Padgett, (Vice Chair), Bob Kempter, ( Secretary), Wilbur Bishop, Milt Fyre, Joe Schweitz; Staff: Randy Clarno, Bill Monahan, Duane Roberts, Stuart L. Cato; Guests: Phil Edin, Don Geary, Ken Larvick, Rob Blakely, Gerry Bail. ABSENT: Homer Hamlin, Donna Scroggins, Lidija Balodis. The meeting was called to order at,7:30 by Chair Tom Sullivan. Randy Clarno presented the city's view and the standards fpr Hall Blvd. in the area of the Tigard Christian Church. Phil Edin, representing the Church addressed .the Hall Blvd. improvement, suggesting the standards be wider above the bridge over Fanno Creek and narrower below, to save redesigning their- Church building which is well along in the final planning stages. After lengthly discussion between Staff, the Committee, and the Church,represen- tatives, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend to City Council that we retain the 55 ft, curb to curb plus 2 additional feet of•right-of•way on each . side, and recommend that a variance with easement proceedure be arranged to accomodate the Tigard Christian Church. This includes the Bike Path in the street, and the sidewalk in the easement portion. Bill Monahan then presented the MSTIP -(Major.Streets Improvement Program), -for the fifthpointing eartand�later. Markact on idiscussedTigard the effectsoofcts the�bondre cmethod�over the fifths y Levey method of funding. The committee agreed the MSTIP is a good idea and plan, and that the Western Bypass should be ranked quite high on the list. Duane Roberts presented the CIP (Capital Improvements Plan) status. He discussed the ratings progran Frank Currie had -attempted to use. Duane is now working with the State to utilize their computer and funds to develop the ratings programming. Tom adjourned the meeting at 9:50, setting the next meeting at 7:30 on Sept. 5. Respectfully Submitted: Bob K er Secretary: MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and City Council August 20, 1985 FROM: Jerri L Widner, Finance Director` SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY JULY, 1985 A brief review of the interest earnings of the City for fiscal year 1984-85 reveals a collection of $444,860.66. TheFinanceDepartment cost the City in fiscal year 1984-85 $303,108.66. Even adding Municipal Court expendituresof $64,132.32, " the department earned more in interest than was , spent in operations. In July we received 5,810 phone calls and had 2,112 walk-ins. Word processing handled 9,265 pages and had a turnaround time 5.2 hours per work order. There were 126 purchase orders processed. There were 4 recruitments and 3 hires and 3 terminations during' the month. There were no unemployment claims filed. One -SAIF claim was filed in July-puncture/rusty nail. There were 5 other {� claims filed against the City: Randy Stevens/grievance-merit increase (has been resolved) Mary Strickland/age discrimination Tracy Miller, auto accident 7/13/85 (Officer Merrill) Thank Van Bui, auto accident 7/13/85 (Officer Peterson) Fred Nichol, summons, criminal counter complaint (Officer Merrill) already filed Ed Latham/long-term disability claim See attached report for status on previously filed claims. The department is gearing up for the annual audit which begins August 12, 1985. JLW:jw (1040F) 7/31/85 r! CITY OF TIGARD CLAIM STATUS REPORT DATE OF LOSS CLAIMANT DESCRIPTION STATUS o/C 2/13/85 David Currier False arrest open 6, pending 8/21/84 George Musiowski Ins. impounded clt's car no activity 2/4/85 Fredric Mickel Criminal counter cplt. open 3/20/83 Fred Ozan False arrest open/atty. working on this 1/11/85 Harry Field Alleges False Arrest pending (Office Merrill) 3/30/85 Steven Courtney Owen Alleges Auto Accident due pending to insured spilled oil or road Unknown George Hludaik Alleges his constitutional pending rights violated Unknown Neil Gerrard Alleges his constitutional wending (; rights were violated 7/13/85 Miller, Tracy L. Ins. backed into claimant's $2530.16 collision pd. car P.D. amount still pending 7/3/85 eui—Thank Van Ins. hit clmt. pulling pending out from stop sign (DH:pm/0886F) e a_ T16AR IrwLPhone 639-9511 12588 SW Main•Tigard. Or.97223 MONTHLY REPORT July 1985 TO: LIBRARY BOARD CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY LIBRARIAN WCCLS: The Request for Proposal (RFP) has been mailed to possible bidders for the automated circulation system and on-line catalog. All libraries are weeding their collections to control costs which are $3.00 for conversion and bar coding each book. The,union catalog will be sent away 1 September for conversion and returned in December. It is anticipated that the equipment will begin instal- lation early 1986. Revised Hours: July 16 the library's open hours were extended from 40 to 46.5 following ,City Council approval on July 8 of increased part-time hours. These - hours were authorized in response to the passage of the county-wide library levy in June. "Rotary Club: July 11 Board Chairman Walt Munhall and City Librarian spoke to the Tigard Rotary thanking them for their $10,000 gift and describing how the money is to beiused. Response was positive. Personnel: Twenty-five volunteers gave a total of 280.25 hours; 10.8 daily average; staff time, 3.75 hours. Three community service assignees worked 44.50 hours; daily average, 1.7; staff time, 1.25 hours. Library Board members gave 11.25 hours. SYEP 176 hours; staff time, 1 hour. Work Indicators: July 1985 July 1984 Adult Materials 5855 5206 Juvenile Materials 3894 3343 TOTAL 9749 8549 Days of Service - 21 18 Average Daily Circulation 464 475 *Increase/Decrease Circ +14% -2.7% Reference/Reader's Advisory 306 215 Storytime (sessions) 118 (5) 36 (3) Special Programs (sessions) 92 (5) 172 (5) Materials Added/Withdrawn 211/7 597/83 Borrowers: New/Renewal 184/119=301 131/109=240 July 1984 the library was open 29 hours. Youth Services: Summer Reading program continued during the month of July with weekly school-age programs that were well attended and well received. An excel- lent parenting workshop on personal safety for children was presented by Julie Weikel of Children-In-Charge. Pre-school storytime continues to be extremely popular and very well attended. r POLICE �EPAR'I MOM-ULY REPOW July, 1985 X City Morin strator/City Council FROM: Chief of Police T. Peil month- There were no rs int is full strength at 29 this turnovers in any division. Bail department strength this month was 15.5 as canPared The averageY Pin � breakdown is as follows: to 15:2 for July, 1985. By division, Services 4.0, Patrol 7.5; Traffic 1.3 and A&ninistcration 1.3; Support Investigation 1.4. II. The department responded to 789 non-criminal calls for service in 1984; total for the .year is 4,596 contrast to 627 calls in Julduring this same ty, ime period last year. as cared 4.506 Obligated time was 1,946.0 hours vs.; 31.2.0 non- Patrol Division's ated time• obligated hours. (ligated time 86.2$ vs. 13.8$ non-obligated to 9 5 e were g0 part, I crimes reported this �ronth as compared 3 III. Ther July last Year- of the Part I crimes reported, 23 were Po 21 Part I crimes or 22.1$. cleare, or 25.6#. Last year, part II crimes and 65 were cleared. or The department responded to 1and 31 were cleat- or ;. 62.5 . Last year, there were. 58 Part II crimes, � to 5l for 53.4%. There were 73 persons charged this �n� as ear 5.3% this period last year. Part I crimes decrecreased this same time peri month over July of 1984. ' ative Division worked 29 active cases this month, and Investigative cleared 9. or 31.0% of their active cases. The reported Property loss was $65,551, and $19,633 was reoowerad. or 30.1$. 1V• Traffic ed to 29 accidents, of that nor 7e Patrol Division resPo:xl as �rpared to 336 for this injury. There were 424 citations issued, warnings were given* The same time period last year. In addition. 287 enforcement index this month was 35.71. V. Police Reserves the impartment � ReserVe Unit worked 267 hours this month time was t out in the �ie majority of this time P� policing the com=lnity' citizens. curttnmity on Patrol and assisting Chief of Police �. . T. lA F, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ( AGENDA OF: September 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM N: �S DATE SUBMITTED: August 28, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Non-Staff Resources/Volunteer Report PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet (Admin. Dept. Report) REQUESTED BY: Council DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE July, 1985, Non-Staff Resources/Volunteer Reprot INFORMATION SUMMARY July's activity on the boards and committee's is normally lower in mid-summer. Library and Police Reserve volunteers had an impressive showing and helped keep the average up. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and File MEMORANDUM C.1 TY of i LGARD, ORt:1;()N TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: 8/28/85 FROM: Donna Corbet, Executive Secretary SUBJECT: Non-Staff Resources/Volunteer Report Category 1984-85 July '86 1985-86 % Chancre Boards 6 Committees: 2552.75 162.25 162.25 76% Volunteer Staffing 4173.75 547.25 547.25 157% Federal r Assistance 2660,;_ 163 163 74% Community Service 1676 95 95 68% Other 1300 Total: 12,362.50 967.50 967.50 94% 15,000 13,00 "12,000 v '11,00 101.00 9_,:00 ; 8,00 7,00 6,00 5,00 (0961p) 4,00 80/81 ;81/82;82/83,83/84'84[85:85/86 • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM N: �.J DATE SUBMITTED: August 28, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUEJAGENDA TITLE: Director's Decision For V 15-85 (Jan & Judith Fessler, and PREPARED BY: Community Development M 9-85 (Ken Waymire) REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: (�L �` CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE ` INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached are the Diredtor's Decisions for: 1. V 15-85 for a Variance to allow the construction of a 1008 sq. ft. accessory building with a maximum height of 23, located at 11180 SW Fonner Street. 2. M 9-85 for Lot Line Adjustment to allow side yard adjustments for all %lots within Bond Park Subdivision No,3. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Receive and file. 2. Remove from consent agenda and call up for Council review at a later meeting. SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and file. CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION VARIANCE V 15-85 APPLICATION: Request by Jan and Judith Fessler for a Variance to allow the construction of a 1008 square foot accessory building with a maximum height of 23 feet where a maximum size and height of 5000 square feet and 12 feetare permitted. The property is zoned R-4.5 HD (Residential, 4.5 units/acre, historic district) and is located at 11180 SW Fanner Street (WCTM 2S1 3AC, T.L. 1700) DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background On December .4, 1984, the subject property was designated as a y 9 historic district b the Planning Commission (ZCHD 17-84) As a result of this action, a Historic District Overlay (HD) was applied to the property in addition to the R-4.5 zone. (( 2. Vicinity Information The properties to the north, east, and west are within Washington County and are zoned for single family residential development. This area is included in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and it has a low density residential designation. It is anticipated that it will eventually be annexed to the City. Genesis subdivision which lies to the south is within the City and is zoned R-4.5. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The Charles Tigard house, which is the reason for the historic designation, is located in the central portion of the property. A long, gravel driveway provides access for the parcel to Fanner Street. The applicant proposes to construct a 1,008 square foot accessory building that will have a maximum height of 23 feet in the northwest corner of the property. A building setback of 10 feet from both the north and west property lines is proposed. This building is intended for private automobiles and equipment for property maintenance. Because of the historic status of the house, an attached garage is not permitted. NOTICE OF DECISION:— V 15-85 — PAGE 1 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering has no objection to the request but it is suggested that proper roof drainage be provided. The Building Inspection Division and the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District have no objection to the proposal. No other comments have been received. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Accessory structures are allowed outright in residential zones with a maximum area of 500 square feet and a height of 12 feet. A variance which meets the criteria contained in Section 18.134.050 of the Community Development Code must be granted prior to constructing a larger building. The relevant criteria are listed below: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity: 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the • lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which, the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of the land, 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code; and 5. The hardship is not self—imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The primary purpose of the size and height restrictions for accessory structures is to prevent the location of large structures in close proximity to residential uses. The proposed building will be larger and taller than permitted by the Code but the building will have twice the required setback (10 rather than 5 feet) from the north and west property lines. Also, there is a considerable amount of vegetation on -the subject property and surrounding parcels which acts as a visual buffer. Finally, the residences on the nearby parcels are over 100 feet from the proposed building. NOTICE OF DECISION - V 15-85 - PAGE-2 The Code does not limit the size or height of garages when they are attached to the residence. Because of the Historic District designation, an attached garage would not be permitted. Also, the Historic District requires that buildings on the property be consistent with the architectural features of the residence and its historic period. The applicants plan to construct a structure which is consistent with -the style of out buildings in the early 1900's and the roof pitch of the house. The accessory building meets orexceedsall other applicable standards contained in the Code. C. DECISION The Planning Director approves V 15-85 subject to the following conditions 1. The accessory ' building shall not exceed '1,008 square feet or a maximum height of 23 feet. 2. The accessory building shall maintain a minimum setback of 10 feet. 3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained from the City. Method of roof drainage shall be approved by the Building Inspector. 4. A tree cutting permit shall be required prior to cutting any trees with a diameter of 6 inches or larger. 5. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant & owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood-Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON September '9, 1985, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF DECISION V' 15-95 PAGE 3 4 3 Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code 'which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. Sept. 9, 1985 4. Questions: - If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE APPROVED (KSL:pm/1774P) i s 11tUTICE-0FOECISIOA! — V'15-85 — PAGE 4 Y4 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT M 9-85 APPLICATION: Request by Ken Waymire for Lot Line Adjustment approval to allow side yard adjustments for all lots within, Bond Park Subdivision No. 3, Lots 49 12 units/acre) and is, through 80. The property is zoned R-12 (Residential, , y raximately located between 79th Avenue and the 81st Avenue right--of-wa , app y 270 feet north of Durham. Road. (WCTM 2S1 12CC, T.L. 101) DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has ' APPROVED the above described application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as 'noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background Bond Park III received Preliminary Plat approval in November, 1983 and the plat has been recorded. 2. Vicinity Information All of the surrounding properties are zoned R-12. Bond Park II is directly east and the remaining development in the vicinity consists of single family residences on large lots. _ 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The subdivision streets, curbs and utility lines have been installed. The lots are all approximately 50 feet in width and the subdivision approval was for single family detached residences with standard 5-foot side yard setbacks. The applicant is requesting the ability to adjust side lot lines in order to accommodate a variety of house designs within Bond Park III subdivision. A single application is preferred in lieu of a separate application and review for each individual lot line adjustment. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a, The applicant's engineer should provide written certification to the City that each adjusted lot has all the necessary utilities provided in accordance with City Code. b. The applicant should' be responsible to remedy any defective or deficient provision of utility service to any lot adversely impacted' by an adjustment prior to occupancy of the affected residence. 5 PAGE 1 NOTICE OF DECISION M 9-8 - z - C. No lot Tine adjustment will be allowed if it would adversely impact a public right-of-way or easement The Building Inspection Department has no objection as Tong as a formal system is used for keeping 'track of the adjustments that are made. The Tigard Water District is not in favor of the proposed lot line adjustments because of the time and monetary cost to the District if water service. lines__need to be moved, If approved, the District will require that the developer bear the expense of any line relocation. NPO #5 has no objection to the proposal. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The Community Development Code provides a two-step review of lot line adjustments. A preliminary application is first evaluated and a decision is, made. -If the preliminary application is approved, a final application is submitted containing the final lot line adjustment map and legal descriptions. Following City approval, the map and legal descriptions are recorded with Washington County. As noted by the Engineering division and the Tigard-Water District, conflicts may result in relation to the location of utility services and driveway locations. The final lot dine adjustment map and legal descriptions shall be required for each adjustment that occurs under provisions of this preliminary approval, The map and descriptions should include information regarding the precise location of existing utilities and driveways. A certification from an engineer should be provided which indicates that the adjustment will not adversely affect existing utilities or that the facilities will be relocated to the satisfaction of those utility company(s) involved. Any costs associated with change in utility location will be borne by the developer. The R-12 zone does not have a minimum lot width requirement, but the 50+/- foot wide lots are relatively narrow for single family detached residences. The 5-foot side yard requirement shall remain in effect as well as. the 5-foot driveway setback requirement contained in T.M.C, Section 15.04.080(b). Variances or waivers of these requirements shall be viewed with disfavor. C. DECISION The Planning Director approves M 9-85 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDING ANY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. 2. The final lot line adjustment application(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director PRIOR TO RECORDING. The Lot Line Adjustment documents shall be recorded by the City and a copy ;,. shall be forwarded to the applicant. In addition to she requirements of Section 18.162.080 of the Code (copy enclosed), NOTICE OF DECISION - M 9-85 PAGE 2 the applicantsmall provide information illustrating the location of all utility facilities in the vicinity of the property line(s) to be adjusted. 3. A registered engineer shall certify that each final lot line adjustment will not have an adverse impact upon the utility services within the subdivision and the service available to individual lots. 4. Any relocation of utilities shall be approved by the appropriate utility company. All costs incurred shall be borne by the developer or lot owner. 5. Variance or waiver requests to the side yard setback requirement of the R--12 zone or the driveway setback standard in TMC 18.04.080(b) shall be viewed with disfavor. 6. One or more final lot line adjustment applications may be filed for lots 49 through 80 of Bond Park III as provided by the above conditions. This approval shall expire within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper. posted at City Nall and mailed to: XX _ The applicant & owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON September 9, 1985, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. Sept. 9, 1985 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 Slut Ash, PO Box 2330, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. 8-28-85 VA-Mam A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE APPROVED NOTICE OF DECISION —,M 9-85 — PAGE 3 CITY OF IIGARU, OREGON COUNCIL'AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 26, 1985 AGENDA ITEM M: DATE SUBMITTED: _August 20, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUElAGENDA TITLE: Director's Decision SDR_10-85 Self Service Furniture PREPARED BY: Bill Monahan REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is a request by Self Service Furniture to construct a 35,600 square foot furniture stare and related facilities on property zoned C-G, located at 14255 SW Pacific highway. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Receive and File. 2. Motion to remove from Consent Agenda and call up for Council review at a later meeting. SUGGESTED ACTIOlY p 5 Receive and file. f; CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 10-85 " APPLICATION: Request by Self Service Furniture to construct a 35,600 square foot furniture store and related facilities on property zoned C-G (Commercial General) and located at 14255 SW pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 10AA, T.L. 1800 and 2000) DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background No previous land use proposals related to this property have been reviewed by the City. 2. Vicinity Information The properties north of Gaarde Street and to the south along Pacific Highway are developed and zoned C-G. The parcel to the west is zoned -R-12 (PD) (Residential, 12 units/acre, planned development) and developed with apartments. A one-way frontage road which directs traffic south from Gaarde Street to Canterbury Square abuts the property on the east. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The property is undeveloped. The applicant is proposing to construct a 35,600 square foot furniture store with a parking area situated between the building and Pacific Highway. A two-way driveway access is proposed on Gaarde Street directly across from a driveway on the north side. The parking area is to be connected with the Canterbury Square parking lot. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. The proposed stormwater system will drain onto private property and therefore the ability of the downstream system to accept addition runoff should be confirmed. b. The State Highway Division should have an opportunity to comment upon the design of street improvements along the property frontage. c. Half-street improvements and additional right-of-way dedication to major collector standards should be provided along the Gaarde Street frontage. NOTICEOFDECISION SDR 10-85 PAGE 1 t NNW The Building Inspection Division has no objection to the proposal. The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District indicates that the f fire hydrants should be located within 250 feet of all portions of the building. No building shall be constructed which needs a fire flow of more than 3,000 GPM unless automatic sprinklers or fire walls are installed. The State Highway Division has no objection to the request but it is noted that some through traffic will occur between Canterbury Sqaure and Gaarde Street via this project. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposed site plan for the furniture store is -consistent with Community Development Code requirements for lot coverage, building setbacks, and access. Several minor amendments must be made in order to achieve total compliance with City standards. 1. Parking The plan meets the parking requirement of 35 spaces The two handicapped parking spaces are 9 by 18 feet. These spaces should be widened to 12 feet. Secure bicycle parking spaces are needed at a ratio of one for every 15 required vehicle parking spaces. Two bicycle rack spaces should be provided for this building. 2. Vision Clearance The Code requires that a 30 foot triangular area on both sides of a driveway entrance must be kept clear of visual obstructions. The vine maples near the Gaarde Street entrance should be moved or eliminated. 3. Landscaping When commercial development abuts a residential use, a sight obscuring fence or evergreen hedge is required. The landscaping plan should be amended to provide an appropriate buffer. 4. Lighting Outdoor security lightinc} is proposed along the west side of the building. Care should be taken so the lighting is directed away from the apartments. C. DECISION The Planning Director approves SDR 10-85 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 10-85 PAGE 2 2. Standard half-street improvements including sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage and utilities shall be installed along the SW Gaarde Street frontage. Said improvements along SW Gaarde Street shall be built to major collector standards and conform to the alignment of existing improvements. 3. Five (5) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans (Plans shall illustrate full road/right-of-way on Gaarde from Pacific Highway to a point 100 ft. westerly of applicant's property and also, the frontage road from Gaarde to the applicant's south property line) and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. 4. Storm sewer plan-profile details (incl. from the site, westerly and northerly to Gaarde Street) shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans: easements to be recorded if such are necessary. 5. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence -until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans. The Section will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond, the payment of a permit fee and a streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit (or construction ' compliance agreement) shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDQUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES, BONDING AND AGREEMENTS 6. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW Gaarde Street frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by Washington County. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section. DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED. 7. Joint use and maintenance agreements shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. Said agreements shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. Said agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Section. JOINT USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FORMS ARE ENCLOSED. 8. A revised site plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which includes the following: a. Handicapped parking spaces that are 12 by 18 feet. b. Two bicycle rack spaces. The location and design of the bicycle parking shall also be approved by the Director. 9. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which includes the following NQTICE OF DECISION - SDR-10-85 - PAGE 3 V ;. 4 r a. Removal of the vine maple in the vicinity of the Gaarde Street driveway. } b. A sight obscuring fence of evergreen hedge along the western property line 10. The landscaping material shown on the approved plan shall be installed prior to occupancy of the building. it. The method for 'lighting the west side of the building shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 12. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D PROCEDURE 1. Notice Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant & owners XX Owners of record within the required distance' XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization _ XX Affected governmental agencies 2.- Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL_ ON August 26, 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. August 26,_ 1985. 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. —' Community Development DAT APPROVED William A. Monahan, Director of Com y p 1• .e l 1 StR(i. J "_1. AM' (KSL:pm/1743P) = r� NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 10-85 PAGE 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF September 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM M: . August 26 , DATE SUBMITTED: g � 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Notice of Decision M 10-85-Baldwin & Ullrich, and PREPARED BY: Community Development M 7-85 - Benj Fran Development REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: Ur CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached are the Notices of Decision for: M -7-85, a request by Benj Fran Development, Inc. for lot line adjustment approval to modify ten 4,225 square foot lots and common area into ten lots of 6,300 to 7,300 square feet on property zoned R-4.5. M 10-85, a request by William and Jean Baldwin and Richard and Sharon Ullrich to adjust two parcels of 0.96 and 0.65 acres into two parcels of 0.82 and 0.79 acres on property zoned R-4.5. ALTERNATIVES OONSIOEREO 1. Receive and File. 2. Motion to remove from Consent Agenda and call up for Council review at a later meeting. SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and file. CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT M 7-85 APPLICATION: Request by Benj Fran Development Inc. for Lot Line Adjustment approval to modify ten 4,225 square foot lots and common area into ten lots of 6,300 to 7,300 square feet on property zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre) and located east of Morning Hill Drive across from Scotts Bridge "Drive ( lCTM 2Si 4AB; T.L. 2400, 2100, 2200, 2300, 2400, 2500, 2fi0Q, 2700, 2800, 2900, 3000). DECISION Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the abovedescribedapplication subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background Approval was granted by the City for the development of Morning Hill in 1978 (File ZCPD 5-77). A portion of this development has been platted 2. - Vicinity Information All of the surrounding area is zoned R-4.5. The land to the north, east, and south is vacant and unplatted. The area. to the west and to the north on both sides of Morning Hill Drive is partially developed. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description Morning Hill No. 2 was platted with 10 building envelopes surrounded by common open area. One building area has frontage on Morning Hill Drive and the remaining envelopes have frontage on a common driveway that intersects with Morning Hill Drive. The driveway and utility lines have been installed, but the building envelopes are undeveloped. The applicant proposes to adjust the lot lines in order to eliminate the existing common area except for the space occupied by the driveway and to enlarge the building envelopes into lots of 6,300 to 7,300 square feet. 4. Agency and ;NPO Comments TheEngineeringDivision has the following comments: a. According to :'City records, the existing driveway did not receive Engineering Division ,approval and as a result, it does not conform to City standards The driveway entrance onto SW Morning Hill Drive should be constructed to City standards and should consist of a concrete driveway apron not to exceed thirty feet in width. NOTICE OF DECISION - M 7-851- PAGE I WN W R- b. The area designated Tract -"F"- of Morning Hill No. 1 and Tract _"Q" of Morning Hill No. 2 (new Tract "A") must provide for public sanitary, storm and general utility easements. C. Proposed Lot #9 shall not be allowed to obtain access directly onto SW Morning Hill Drive and, further, it shall be required to have access onto Tract "A" as far to the east as possible. Lot #10 shall be required to obtain access onto SW Morning Hill Drive as far to the south as possible. The Building Inspection Division and Washington County Fire District No.l have no objection to the request. NPO #7 suggest that a turn around should be provided at the end of the private drive. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposed lot line`adjustment is consistent with the approval granted by the City for Morning Hill. The lots will be capable of accommodating homes which 'meet applicable setback requirements, C. DECISION The PlanningDirector approves M 7-85 subject to the following conditions: -�v 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDING THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. 2. The revised legal descriptions for the two parcels shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director PRIOR TO RECORDING. After approval, the City shall record the documents and forward a copy to the applicant. 3. The entranceway onto SW Morning Hill Drive shall be constructed to City ;Standards and shall consist of a concrete driveway apron not to exceed thirty feet in width. A, street opening permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Division prior to construction. 4. The area designated Tract "F" of Morning Hill No 1 and Tract "Q" of Morning Hill No. 2 (new Tract "A") shall provide for public sanitary, storm and general utility easements. 5 Proposed Lot #9 shall not be allowed to have direct access onto SW Morning Hill Drive and, further, 'it shall be required to have access onto Tract "A" as far to the east as possible. Lot #10 shall be required to obtain access onto SW Morning Hill Drive as far- to the south as possible. Access shall be approved by the Planning Director prior _to issuance of building permits. NOTICE OF DECISION - M.7-85 --PAGE 2 6. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice; Notice was published in the newspaper. posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant & owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 2, Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON September 3, 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development ; Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed With the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:00 P.M. Sept. 3. 1985 4, Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box -23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. 8-22-85 Wi iam A. Monahan, Director of Community DevelopmentDATE APPROVED (KSL:b3l1766P) Y NOTICE.OF DECISION - M 7-85 — PAGE 3 .z CITY OF TIGARD :. NOTICE OF DECISIOiU LOTLINEADJUSTMENT M 10-85 APPLICATION: Request by William and Jean Baldwin and Richard and Sharon Ullrich to adjust two parcels of 0:96 and 0.65 acres into two parcels of 0.82 and 0.79 acres on property zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 unites/acre) and { located at 13500 and 13530 SW 121st Avenue (WCTM 2S1 3DC TL 4401 and 4500). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described applications subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision areas noted below. r A. FINDING OF FACT i. Background A proposal for a Lot Line Adjustment/Minor Partition/Variance (M 1-85/MLP 5-85/V 9-85) was denied by Planning Commission on June 4. J` 1985. A modified proposal for a lot line adjustment (M-4-85) was approved to reduce the. size of the southern' parcel involved in this application. 2. Vicinity Information The properties to the east on Terrace Trails Drive, one parcel on the west side of 121st Avenue and one property immediate to the south are within the City and are zoned R 4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre). The remaining parcels are within Washington County. The entire area is designated for Low Density Residential development in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Single family residences lie to the north (Woodcrest Subdivision) and east (Terrace Trails). A long, narrow parcel with a residence borders the subject property to the south. " 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The northern parcel extends from 121st Avenue to a point 20 feet f west of Terrace Trails Drive. The southern parcel is vacant and has frontage on Terrace Trails Drive. The applicant proposes to change the configuration of the two parcels from long and narrow to wider and shorter tracts. The common boundary between the two parcels will be modified so that the undeveloped parcel will include the eastern area presently occupied by both parcels and the northern parcel, including the k house, will comprise the remaining western portion. w NOTICE OF DECISION - M 10-85 --: -PAGE 1 A. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments. a. A City street opening permit is required for any work done within the Terrace Trails right-of-way (eg. driveway, sewer line connection). A similar permit is required from Washington County on 121st Avenue. b. An easement should be provided from Terrace Trails Drive to the western parcel to facilitate future connection to sanitary and/or storm sewer. The Building Inspection Division has no objection to the proposal. No other comments have been received. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal is consistent with the applicable standards in the Community Development Code for minimum lot size, access and building setbacks. The existing parcels do not conform with a City requirement which states that lot depth shall not exceed 2.5 times the width of the lot. In addition to achieving conformance with .City standai^ds, the resulting parcel configuration will promote better utilization and maintenance of the property. C. DECISION The Planning Director approves M 10--85 subject to the following conditions: 1. The revised legal descriptions for the two parcels shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director PRIOR TO RECORDING. After approval, the City shall record the documents and forward a copy to the applicant. 2. A 10 foot wide public utility easement shall be provided across the eastern parcel between Terrace Trails Drive and the western, parcel along the northern property line. (City form enclosed). This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. p; PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant b owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The "affected.Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmenta.1 agencies NOTICE OF DECISION - M 10-85 PAGE 2 �. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON September 3. 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL C. IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community ich provides that a written appeal 'must be Development Code wh filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:00 P.M. Septa 3, 1985 4. (yluestions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639.'4171: 8/22/85 ent DATE APPROVED William A. Monahan. Director of Community 0evelom p (KSL:bs/1765P) NOTICE OF ;DECISION — M 10-85 PAGE:3 ' 7.;1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 23, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Consensus of Council ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: RESOLUTION to prepare Resolution 8/19/85 APPROPRIATING CONTINGENCY PREPARED BY: J. Widner DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR I - POLICY ISSUE To continue Library, Engineering and Parkprograms at desired levels for fiscal year 1985--86. - INFORMATION SUMMARY At the City Council meeting of August 19, 1985, the City Council discussed the WCCLS levy money and its impact. The Council reviewed the Community Development program i.e. , engineering and parks as well. Due to increasing revenues from the WCCLS levy and engineering fees it was determined that additional staff are justified. Contingency funds are to be appropriated as follows' _. Department From To Appropriation Library: Personnel Services $145,338 $178,838 $ 33,500 Materials & Services 9,002 13,000 3,998 Capital Outlay 98,660 201,620 _102 960* Total $253,000 $393,458 $140,458 *Note: $46,900 for Automation Equipment also authorized by Council but must await 11/85 Supplemental Budget. Engineering: Personnel Services $136,655 $164,655 $ 28,000 Materials &Services 18,040 20,040 21000 Capital Outlay 15,500 15,500 -d.- Total $170,195 $200,195 $ 30,000 Parks: Personnel Services $ 30,068 $ 54,068 $ 24,000 Materials & Services 23,432 29,432 6,000 Capital Outlay 1,500 1,500 -0- Total $ 55,000 $ 85,000 $ 30,000 General Government: Materials & Services 335 000 $340,000 5,000 Contingency: General Fund $222,595 17,137 $205,458* *Budget Committee recommendation and Supplemental Budget revisions scheduled for 11/85. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Do Nothing. 2. Adopt attached resolution SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends passage of the attached resolution. (10A4F) CITYOF TIIFARD August 21, '1985 WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON Mr. H. W. Lyster 15625 S.W. Alderbrook Circle Tigard, OR 97224 Dear Mr. Lyster: Regarding your letter of July 29, 1985, may I offer the following comments: 1. Any question concerning Mr. Edwards' attending the League of Oreg«n Cities convention should be addressed to the Council. Mr. Edwards was requested to attend the meetings as a councilor-elect to begin preparing him for his council responsibilities. As I recall, the Council decided at a public meeting. 2. Attached"is Mr. Jean's documentation for his travel and ferry expenditures. 3. Your position on the City's policy regarding the use of Visa ` cards is understood. 4. Your opinion on the Visa invoices itemized under your item number 4 is acknowledged. 5. As mentioned previously, city travel and business meal expense reimburse- ment policy will be addressed as part of our annual audit procedures. 6. Attached is evidence of Mr. Jean's reimbursement for the $54.66 you have requested. Should you have further concerns, please contact me. Sincerely. - Phillip in Councilor PE/dc(0952p) cc: Mayor and Council John Dethman, Coopers & Lybrand C 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 :l S lNJ U i triMcnWz a 00 3 acg pi IT IQ' fh- ¢ O \ d ti u W .�■M o r a O ca S ON q LO T4 W czW Z t�Ap� i12 vi µ1n G -4 Q CW 2 N M CD _j to v @ R ..KZ W •y NT. w`u a in S N W �. pp r, Q r 2 Arcc cc w iE W p $[ Ic UA Te Wply?�R wN IU �Z r m /\ YMa CD cr IL c3 LAM cc oLn K I , - r r rCT t i .6. r r • � • C•L s • i/.! r rru Ln Ln 00cru 00 Yo ' J. � + 3 W m N ^� Fe ru co 0 w 'A w t m JB s C17Y®F TWAO No. 088.E 12755 S.W.ASH Ar _. i Lp-O.BOX 23397 Date -Y- TIGARD,OR 97223 Name Address iCi Lot Block/Map Subdivisi !Address Check Permit#'s Plumb Cash Bldg. (/ Sewer Other Other Rea.: Description Amount Acct- NO. 10-432 Building Permit Fees 10.431.600 Plumbing Permit Fees 10.431.601 Mechanical Permit Fees 10.230.501 State Bldg.Tax 10-433 Plans Check Fes 1¢435 Other Licenses&Permits 30.443 Sewer Connection 30.444. Sewer ins ection 24.448 Street S st.Dev.Char e 25.449.610 Parks I S Ist. Dev.Char e 25-449620 �10 m DSaina9esS st Charge Charge 31-450 10,430 Business Tax 10.434 Alarm Permit 10-227 Bali 1045 I Fines-Trait(!III 777=MilParking 10-230. CPTq TrafficlMisdlVic.Asst. 10-456 Indigent Defense 30446.401 Sewer ServicefUSA 30-445-402 Sewer ServicslCity 31-447 Storm Drainage 40.475 Bancroft Prin. mt. ' 40.471 Bancroft Int. mi. 10.451 Other Char es for Services fJ0 T®TAL DEPT. 2` w CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ^ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: September 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: /r�2 DATE SUBMITTED: Auqust 29, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Acceptance of Similar ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Acceptance of Deeds and Easements i Road RJW Deeds and Slope Easements PREPARED BY: Randy Clarno --- for 68th Parkway L.I.D. No. 35 REQUESTED BY: Engineering DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: �f` }''"- CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY ' The attached documents represent deeds and easements required on the S.W. 68th Parkway L.I.D. #35. Both Way W. Lee, General Contractor, Inc. and the Oregon Education Association have conveyed to the City a Slope Easement and Road Right-of-way deed each. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION The Engineering Division recommends that Council accept these deeds and easements (4) from Way Lee, General Contractor, Inc. , and the Oregon Education T Association. �T (1785P)- MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, AUGUST 28, 1985 FROM. IRENE ERTELL, LIBRARIAN < SUBJECT: LIBRARY FURNISHINGS RFP AND CALL FOR BID and Call far Bid will be hand carried on The Library Furnishings RFP September 4. O964p tiR , 3{. �. .� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMA:?t' AGENDA OF: September 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM is 15.7 DATE SUBMITTED: September 4, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Presented to City ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approval of Council on August 19, 1985 ` Library Furnishings RFP and Call REQUESTED BY: City Council for Bid 9 DEPARTMENT HEAD OX: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: rt�•��- _ INFORMATION SUMMARY The furnishings for the library have been divided into 6 lots. Lot #1--Wooden Furniture, est. $86,624. Lot #2--Metal shelves and stack lighting, est. $38,227. Lot #3--Area carpets, est. $5,203.- Lot #4--Miscellaneous furnishings, est. $11,882. Lut #5--Refurbish antiques, est. $747. Lot #6--Plants, est. $2,549. Total estimate--$145,061. This in- cludes product, freight, dealer mark-up and installation. Under the City of_Tigard pur- chasing rule #10.015 "the city may, in`its'discretion let public contracts not to exceed $15,000 for the purchase of goods, materials,, supplies and serviceswithout formal com- petitive bidding" if it results in cost savings and the contract is for a single project. For contracts less than $15,000 but more than $1,000 the City shall obtain a minimum of three competitive quotes. It is possible that the bids on Lots #1 and Lot #2 could come in higher or lower than estimated. By delaying the purchase on the remaining lots, ad- justments could be made if Lots #1 and #2 come in higher. It will also provide time to solicit more donations toward the purchase of these remaining lots. essassassa,xasaawsssssassazsaaszssasassaswssa:aa+s:azaaaaaazsasazaaasase$cszzatszzssramaaa ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Bid all lots at once. 2. Bid Lots #1 and #2; get quotes and estimates on Lots #3, 4, 5, 6. Adjust Lots #3, 4, 5, 6 i Lots #1 and #2 are high. sSeas::ssssssssssaszrssasssassmaxzp:saaassaaasssaasamaazaasssaaaresssassa:sssaaasa= SUGGESTED ACTION - Bid Lots #1 and #2 on September 12 and 13. Call bids on September 30. Adjust remaining lots as necessary and get quotes per L C R B rule 10.015. t� BID FORM DRAFT PROPOSAL` FOR amr�jactl� CITY OF-TIGARD Doty LIBRARY & FURNISHINGS TIGARD, OREGON Date TO: Purchasing Agent, City of Tigard 12755 SW Ash Ave. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Ladies &'Gentlemen: Having carefully examined the Request for Proposal entitled City of Tigard Library & Furnishings, the Drawings similarly entitled, as well as the premises and conditions affecting the work, the Undersigned states he has the men and means to complete the work and proposes to furnish all labor and materials and to perform all work required by and in strict accordance with the above--named documents for the following sums: TOTAL LOT #1, t DOLLARS( )• TOTAL LOT #2. DOLLARS( )• Name of Firm By --- Title Address Zip Telephone - --- NOTE: If bidder is a corporation, write state of corpora_ +i; and if a partnership, give full names and addresses of all partners below: CAUTION:- Include no !aids for other work in the same envelope. (JM:pm/0953p) - i' D 'AFr LOT NO. 1 ,_._...;'� tt55iOtf 4WY Code Unit Extended No. Qt4. Item Manufacturer Price Price 6 10 Lounge Chair_ Design Group 7 12 Arm Chair Design Group 8 -49 Reading Chair Design Group 9 6 Bench Design Group 15 1Desk Design Group 23&77 See plans ' Wood End_Panels Design Group 77 4 Top Canopy-Plastic Design Group 27 1 New Book/Magazine Display Design Group 28 1 Index'Table Design Group 29 3 Rectangular Read. Table Design Group 30 5 Round Reading Table Design Group` 31 1 Reference Table Design Group 33 1 Atlas Case Design Group 34 1 Dictionary Stand-Lecturn Design Group 35 5 ranges Low Shelving Design Group 36 1 range High Shelving Design Group 37 1 range High Shelving Design Group 38 4 Study Carrel Design Group 40 1 Listening Carrel Design Group 40 1 Listening Table Design Group 40 1 Work Station Unit Design Group 40 1' GRT/Pr-&nter Station Design Group 40 21 Acoustical Panels Design Group 40 1 range Medium Shelving Design Group -- 41 12 Fabric Panels and Posts Design Group 42 1 Directory/Information Design Group 44 1 Kiosk Design Group 468 3 Lounge Chair Design Group 47b 2 Arm Chair Design Group 48c 2 Rectanglar Reading Table Design Group 49d 10 Reading Chair Design Group 54 1 Record Bin Design Group 55 1 Study Carrel Design Group 61d 8 Reading Chair Design Group 62 5 Child's Reading Chair Design Group 63 6 Child's Bench Design Group 64 1 Reading Table-child's size Design Group 64 2 Reading Table Design Group 69 1 Desk, single pedestal Design Group 71 1 Sloped Display Table Design Group 720 1 New Book/Magazine Display Design Group 73 1 Record Bin Design Group 78 1 Desk, single ped. Design Group 80d 7 Reading Chairs Design Group 81 1 Rectangular Reading Table Design Group LOT NO. 1 TOTAL aSee Code No. 6 ..:: bSee Code No. 7 cSee Code No. 29 dS+ee Code No. 8 eSee Code No. 27 (0953p) LOT NO. 2 Code Unit Extended No. Qty- Item Manufacturer Price Price 23,60 Metal Book Stacks Library Bureau & 77 I'S Initial Dbl. Face 76 Add. Dbl. Face 3 Initial Single Face 24 Add. Single Face 5 Initial Dbl. Face 9 Add. Dbl.- Face 4 Add. Dbl. Face 1 Initial Single Face 5 Add, Single Face 2 Initial Dbl. Face 3 Add. Dbl. Face 2 Initial,Single Face 8 Add. Single Face 1400 TU-BAR shelves 20 TU-BAR shelves 1420 LOC-TITS bk. supports 103 Dbl Face Canopy Tops 4 Dbl. Face Canopy Tops 33 Single Face Canopy Tops 12 Hinged Periodical Shelves 1 Peninsular Filler 1 Peninsular Filler 1 Peninsular Filler Cap 370' Strut Channel 45 Strut Channel Clips 24 Stack Lighting Peerless Lighting Co. 5 Flush Mt. Lt. Fixture 5 Flush Mt. Lt. Fixture 1 Flush Mt. Lt. Fixture 60 See Plans Metal Shelving Library Bureau 77 See Plans Metal Shelving Library Bureau LOT NO. 2 TOTAL (0953p) .o 0 H r 5, czo cz U L > E � v r eo L in E i g m m d +° COp v► a� �> ccno y .. M , E co 00 U �Mo a; — Cp P to - = o o C° c" L1A E a; � � y ID L v � 0. .. �^ l 0 E 1° in Y 7 t0a i F- -moi .0u IA E rn E � .� rn Q- i i O O ~' O m 00 C in iu O d r m V �' U1 U Im _ OCC > cz . . CL Q .0 0 O LL. L O > O O from w i s io lAw-AWOL > _ N A 've,. L •- L N,� O C x u EAZ "" E ' xCL E om in 1; V .i in EE w°y9 'O �] N D m 'O Y x eo i CL— a D !2' .. y0jL.3r W. = uyN � no� uyW �L C �C r E a 9" E C.0 �,>'= L. 10. +�+ <U. to u 5 .0+ dG +�0 0: ' co Z) al (In NV1 m 0 5 ')ah C s +K 00 �. r r N �+ c a N.m '@pp U W VE .. Q p.Q 0 7 C u a o: `�' 0 H •— L 4-4 v U U V U V Vii--- 13 c c ., QL I f 1 U _m ON O CN ll �/ U 1. x x W •' �a C u 3A � � tD Y ?tn'O u 4) ao . ._. ro •� a w ••,N i $ C 3 N 3 p p_�. >. 'O C -p C rs* ... ro N 1-- m U ro F. ti y i O o oma O i w � ii O m d J U J U U ca zw to U OR,..i qs v► U tY J o roo rm CL 0 L i p LL roL d z a) Z cr J ►To J eC _ ro Z ... Z T u�i C (x N= cr :yr L M Uch in rl Q 0. n L L '' 3 iv to d 4A Lia e ro 5 0 U L C �O �� p U t%Z tronw V: �� AML'! 0 LOU VO U vi M .0 U eo U U *�••¢ O A d ;; rLo ip � .: ;; A � � A ui V 'i3 Cry -6 ~ i � OtC id �O1C CU p'O U � 'OU E U._ ro p�tL'�„ C7 �` E ro t M • n Ud �.Svt Utnw2V1 J.aw 3 mC4 Q�n tY� N w 4D cn CY r4 H ,r C G�$ m Ua Ln n ao O O l0 Y ro Y v ro ro tU � N ¢ Lo Lv uQ cia )< v 0 H •c LCL Ui M a 3 i 3 Or it C O to Vf to to t!) a fn U 00 � J U U ai E ea N � u � L.... ._ 7 <- a LL U cn O CJ L? O �" .. •0 4-. x 7, XE m " ani ai ani a -c_ L o a 'c 3'0 L �. N N N N E N L ECDN m m m m z : > x I E E E E z t0 cr Z cn�Ef Et cn cn U N N N N la/1 C w m N e0 m /fl O Q Ca O N Ifl N f - N A W N M = NM C a Cat a C eo a G eo a Cat a C O4 a V... P. a Ug N a v •- V- •- a6E dU N Vt N m L m X m L 10 X m L m X m L tp X N L N X _ a xa _ C e ,C ~ eh V 10 M V f0 M U A �"� V ~ th V CT in s m in N a $ CL� O $ CL*'� fl 3 0.tr U 3 o. tl C � o a N <' a ?.` � c -0 C " Q>� c a •- r C c, c .ten,n s o *- U v c a L Li i a a a a a L i C i C i C L G i C L Q Q V< W< V Q V Q V Q .o r 0 H _ oil .. O V >_ i � 3 0 r w C cn V s_ V�r��� � •� p 0 W Q C _ U C/ n d �/ .� _ co •� d 75 CD o v1 eV s U. C 1 '� ..i ►r1 V V) C7 g Z Co V O -� w r a :.: 0 o f 'C Z 1- 0 Q C f] C Ja0A•w' aM '�' Z =° U L3 U -0'a C to x CL C eo E m 0 L 'A`„ UW to 0 L U ti- C., z z i s :3 i 7 � 13 cr th r �.0 � tU 3 cr � -TC-t A � 4e O.0 R0 'mCi Q p Q''^AC 'nwdlr uV .a � iU-p r tocc (Y.0 C1 IA H .how p yo"m*0 Im u emor° w �N. .- -CACO O 0 _ r tD �� C o r u -------------U C Y d d eo ry Eo >_ obi i •� o r a ua oW- 0 v V i L Ln :3 C C co C U m _ to L CL CL • JQ, (7 C3 O p U -� w �- (o _ n. CL CL a a a� C a� v .n L '> co .p. - U -� m -� v m >. LL ..�../ V .o �, s en cz U) O G EY3 L, •C cc CL— L. 4a L—L. .- L mmL _O X N p L 4J On O 21_r O U I-- O O 0 U -jzw U — .- UU 4? >m C, ,n m - md 14 E " 4— L7 L9 0 +' r, 41 w p 8 u OCa � C m •3 u CL j t0 fl. 4i ami ��p ego L E .i = �� _ p m ._ � C E i0 -1 `� +n co Los c din C-_ G C m L.4):r. en •a to yLj a9 .�. 3 M m � _. 0 C Q.C (D v •y, •% Q1 M > M i c t tJ, $ C O ,� C > A w C r� 4! d eL+ 0.- U V m ++ i Ch , Oa d i-" d CLd m > L H Lw V C � � C ++ me a i '� i'" .0 �_ '' ro .� �� ImC ui E .- •Ea � � o 0 .n ) L' m C ro • > t"+� t1 d 04�.O � � L7 NN MN t1 ' E C '°� (0 CL�' 3 L t0 0 41 4)a W CL 47 L.CL L L L N a cE m a 1 ,1 r. o _>O 0 a 0 N m a N �m- u In .a f�+�[ v � y-4 � ® t U C V).3 O m �++ rn rn m O m O 04 U •- .. CL o. di V V C C 4) C 4m1 w ai cui w w w U ¢W �o 0 f-- O L. L d to L' C a a. a C) n c41 o J W W a o. a a a a L Ur^ Ln v / Uro > (C no^�o ni nn 11 'O ci CO W L ro T �.. v ro 4� LL U cn m xa Q4cz � O m � CD ^ m co LL O O i d p Lam. O v Q W -a L) oUU3 C ? U e- ^ N U 1 ro CD ro rers c «. C -I- M '0 D U fl C pp Z7 C a to l a 0 IA co V' L'p ^ '� y ro - L ~ e ro t tv O1 y., ro 2 H Uw� � a y - CL L- 1 c3too CL 10 v a � O o v f0 i- «:3 �N a� � O rn � 'd O :. C L O ro U C b N O 41 i •� ro ., O ro a 3 v U ro 0 C� ,. Cb C m o C Q)4_ .� M 93 -0 L. Uztlz U C 'p CA w U Z3 u H y .< p �. ca �r t+f >Q O l?®a Li o �� ��� UCL C.4 e. m m e - ro U C � i C cc L. C aroi vo _ U U Q a to to ..ems. L L n L C cro m C C .,,w - N fO f0 'D III' L ua. a n. CL CL a a a CL 41 �v u co m V to U. !O t+f o 0 s Q m •� . ,, ... LL Qa U 0 U i sem. i Cr . > > > ee C i Ep D 'C3 •, •' d > O Cn C O m m (U.m O to d Oi. GJ L U m t- !0 OMO 7 +' y C O m +' $ L a Co C p ace (d_' �w 3 •p >-0 _ w v E d c c — «; cr— > > 5 4�! M . «m. C d a+ O d d CD y:°� m o;O 0 m ~ ••� j.0 ,.y„ •m a •m � m _> >� C io a�.� C y'L0 r > C L a r m "+ I O �CL 4 �"'•O O > N ? tD i3 O •rD w oo a 3 U U w'm y,. u O r A y C _ a • Ln i t c >Q o A C7K. �Qy O O O c po �oo O tn rn m cis O rn O rn cm W un fA C n 6 V r r y� a r.. a r r gn f- d7 y L d O d O O E c d 0 v o N DJ. 30 •3O _ 3 0 •78 � C.c arm_' a�z aw aW ci ¢ .- m x � ¢ ¢` 0 1- o 3 3 3 C , O O ro U J J y - a O O f0 o C/n� a� J U u ro Ln2, •L co Ql r ro L . cn UL ✓ H —O► cAo 4-1 p 0 ,}•� O cz CD LA �. �.. 0 o pry C s oCA U u U j O r r 4. •i ^� H N N Jo r Y C .•• = civ y M � O p .+ _ IL W F•' d O r N L Q CL V LL a 4)Y r V) � '&- •u E � E Ui U- m C cn o y C1 O r �eo Q Lro dro :, d�-�= 3 io C ro ro d ^ � > CLi G Olt L 6r1 y cl U-a Ha > 7 dgr' to C n `m a _v o T N c m coO ami O >« O Q .fi d muo o ��c IA N N _tV yr O Q c .: i i ro � i ..N M %- .� y i Ci carol : ro Ca4, ¢ , a)a m L -L� d) oZ c� 0< � _0 < mry r UL _L ca Q1 s% ,-, [L1 L p ca co nl COm �J J COL- CO n p C � U U •� i rn a? U W 2 TO LL u n ® L 8 c 3 LL d p .0 N O W - U 3 � IA -owl w as U) E E E a� 1L.-cot co In c c , u „ u = 'd d U. 'O to C d V. H�_ j Q! Ol d C1 61 > CL Ln Y .. cen � _ Ql= 3 coo N O r to ro 4A 0 C4 0 a �! O] •+ p r' C31 Cn O '- O N •M L71 p `cn CJ1 _c m ILO in " Q1 01 O ;_ Ot L71 c � '136 'CC3 su • '$° zdi =�i at a Q N L *v! bE t FL N a HC O 2.2 QNmM � uu Q a � yr o > Ln � 10 0 O d ti th N. e. O G G N .C3nvOiS O -^ N U CNv►= sC 75 .°Q c tD (n L Q y L O O C _ 0 < in U 0 F f o #.. c V L . L •- C3 (D f1,1 U) L^ co L w O1 U LL CL a s LL_ 41 ch cI L c' E E e v evo m 0-0 �3 w to IM v �3 v► � �3 m svo v 3 w s � u a U.'2 0 to C � � 13 0 LL -0 w c e0 C q? v IV > a Q' LL ai"�' 'O Zi > cu t? 0> N m •CL LL y •0. c 3: :2 v E o a� E d m— ._ a� ar , E E p M 3t m a am 3t U. d 3L .a a �3s W M cn deo m w oN - L. S4 in p 3 - CA o (n w .c cwt N M 9n N M V1 d Q m g iR t.t] '- y py c .- . 'p C3 �t Q C .t f1 in '' m @ - .d y d O ^ Q1 cn p'L7 N o ^; tJ1 IM r'- al cn Orr 01 .- r;�7 N O ^ a C4 W CIA C a &. r► 'a cn �o C �; .- D io 'D ey w O c ow -ro O m N a �n w C .- to ro e,4 s.o t in 4aceoTn eakent Q4uto � a 4qu � N rain Q a C� c a -v:' <' c P . -rr to CN M N 00 ; �o 0 f— (' --� m U au (DCf) � U ,U u'co >_ .L U .r LQ1 1._ u► �' F- m ..}.J U- C) Q 16 a- o N Ln .. d a N y W - N N i O O O > en in rn 0a.. 0 F- C-4 CN cl N N CL C x X R1 M U w G CL -d V1 O tD O X O io L L L C71 L N C' N .. > - > - O U x Uc x 'C1 — t - � - T CL wZ, asz A w = cuN U - O U. �- �, _ �- �s C co C i tee tN _ Oro '% w: vi I ` V YI IA Lu N Il. U r �y L• tD M L t+1 L N 0- �+ it F- Li U- to m CL � R! r cti tD M t ou z C 0 d r -� M N M x U Yf1 x H r- U d U O 4/ .- �o m'p co 'p ~ 1] fn N C N cD C N i0 C N 7.0 rrfl rh'►.- - UM � r � r C .- C1n •CtDN •C %DN C {O L ✓ L Cl- _ J N N 0 r o lD 0 t0 to 1� C► r. 0 P4 w r� ++•'� y 'U m F- •- F- = 0 � in� s = a Q x CL x a err cn C a` a 0 0 40 rn N _ Ln O N N r =r M r �- r- r- O :T >-a p O � e ® m en IE c on to O U n� 0 t. Oc -N L � V J W e cz co C VJ v J V L crs c U O d �1 U D. e ALJE o c .5.....qj a' u U `O C ul ...o •L - i 4) c tL •> tn L a. 'O •� L 3 t LL CL e m W .i c i o m O H e n L r e L ,4 a J-o0 Nd v k c r 4) aci a (D a� .. O at L 4, Q L .� U Q w � � C .Ta C In x U N C O 0 Cb e � N p u E � c cd av •amu o zo• o. n _C a a vv Q CD ++ O 0 0 /> m U a H c i O a C� L1 J CC C C CD7 CA CA cm Q) nn,, VI to cu w lV a Q C a co U C > I rn L U a �a u A p � y N •0 � p L.L L L •� a LL O O 'C ZL Z L U V � � I a I Q) C � o t w Z m Z t ELLLU -M O :: M. Y 0- a CL a -p CL co u rn a a rn a Q U C C U -p U 13 Io U L O X 4/ X a ID roa � ,c a a a c M a_ a101 Cn w u L L2.'D �^^ 3 0 o C O ♦` M �+ .� IM t.� L �L'{� L 4- M Y Com! X l0 In,_O r .� 0 - 0 *' m s= B c'1 O iD* oo v > m " C O a'C3 E i. C E in C C1 +a'' a a O V1 � A�CL.i w� O a � 0 a — O d tm vui C v•O a E a a E a E L O C'a c a C C _ �- w a m a s ti, C a W In 'l7 'b L9 'Q Z3 C d'In cp L to 3 O � > m -p Iv -p �� •o •'Y L T 3 L L aai E � U C � pN p a 3 a a 3 a us O s CL•— . u _ _ a`r O ,� �' CL N 7 CL =' CL � 3 a O O C p ff, N f0 IG N R V lr S. tlCD 0` : } N • < Q to C 13 CN m C14 Sn mcg a Q«..o CL `o . �eWE o � ,� cap cY c .�• C �N6 p w� n. Q N .�( n 3 n Y1 Q Q s, C: m L Q -C 0 F- V � /CIO. L Q -_r0 ILE L G Ulc d �1 u U u, � >_ co i rn y cr U � pis m u 'i 4--J <L IV 2 TO -t, n � s � �' vs Mia LL 0Ei °' 0 o u !- J y L i d L X X X CD rn_ C O _O 0) O U Q5 J J J G rn E E Q- ai 0.to ° o cN c ^ c7 a= ,L - a W �_ � � 50 30 — 2c d m p D J � J -C J � � O ^ O Y t n L �^ N E '3 u N ' v, 1 a 1 d w E C° $ M tom m +`D+ �`�,�N to 7N O � -- cn Q N o to —FL u. :m u. -4uz C a C 0 rn L" .• m u-o 0 Q.., O c N v . C d 3 m� d m a c as o O r- U� :J � r O C O r� - 4. O 3 �. i o u Q mNEn 0 O C tl1 i NCL L c p ro a d L L 4-4 U 0V (1) ; a L t Q� a _ mw L !� �. Q fJ LL_d C+ / U 'j ao ._ rn d U u 75 i (a LL L- -4 Ln �o a LL nt� a .r d L I U. o a Z D o W .� cr Z T LY Y d y L O i Otro .. $ •O E T d r'O L -" vl N _� C d N to ro t - — C3 0 uwo� dpi., U U U ~CJ O p Nth U d +d. LS M O ro D `� C U +• co L- O c •3 1 t C C rn C m •_ L a d E Q— v N w d 'm 3 Y °] ° lwn C d = O C p :+ m m w != C y O w M t1 3 U j " u+ vl•_ C Q-m N C u .O d " +� C n al .L .� E i L= = Q. v►-- d E- tC vl Q C -. d p N d � E� O O Oly� Cro p vri �. � i > io O� N C a Q 1 L O - ro V L. (Oj ~ O d G-p ,� 3 d N m L d'EIn L 'mss > - 4) ap3Uoca (Mw a > c U p'v c .. _ -0 L� __ o > O 3a L C� C o� u c c � c�3 .3z0, r- u uC M-J v aM¢ U z a � oC. 04 C ' CIL �� < O y C O Lnn U N N N C ._ rn 3 c m a 3 Om L 1 d 3 Y N CL U W,i a. (D �...'A L. N..o �o 0 411 _ _ L L L L i L 0 > u v 0 v v C C C C C lLC •N �N SFA r .- •tn (� �nn ro v C a C/) u Ln > Go L ._ m a U W ro L � L m -+—+ u �.. .(D /W�� a co co 0o co m N N N N ... 2 �V LE 0 y � � � O _ LL (1 ® ° N :3 ++ ._. m `�+ C iu am � > NZu > m > > > ro O O O ° O u. ° 41A, E c � E E m E m E E m Z a. Ll- U N N N N N V ro ma) NC a v°i C N f0 N L ax o C �Ern ro do u � —aa. Cp ► C N co m a a N a N a En th Q d _ L O 'a C 't7 Q.O U m 'D C 'p ea— ro a x a a v R N m x a s:% dao m x �CN .o � � .acro Mac O F. — o rn fl= a ^- m � r•s m— mL ro — ro r C4 x 13 �s " C m 73 S- 0 .c ��. o O � m .� a�' C and m=° 7 «. m .0 u a 3 W 4 +. tr �CL 3 a N �. V � a Q. Q m 3 Ln Cb ` crc 0 MQ OROto w 0. C41{ 0 co N M M M .. a u u V m a LSM L w a Ea L L 4 Q w a i �O O _d L oa w ¢ 0 ¢ aw c� r 0 H c' V n 4l 0 0 O 0 L m � O O O p O , (ll ,;o c c c nnVcoCO V1 L c "' rn d n m �.. >` •v m C (D r m x E m m m ro LL �' L0 m p E C) m O ' O C Z d u 2� E � >o Z Z J p- coO L m m z .2a: tLUx N Z m ^ m ^ N w w N ++ r N a+ N C r m m r_ m � p -]t -C 7 em+ Q1 .. SI C [}1 v. •3 N O N U CT. •• N.� ,r,• t m x '� 4- '; m m V C •m O .� N O L > C > `►- t O L >y- N C _> "- J •' d L E IM4, S- d — - � 40 41 >v 11 -@'@ O - .in 04 N m d Ip 41 Z 1 -0 N N 0 N w a. V s N L N N -0 N N �' N L N y -O Ul N -a co •� m .p s oo •N .m+ r r C C u y C T3 I 'a m C trn " D Q •' E C N m m Q m y y N :r • tA m-• N m p1 u C4 En -O X CL u - r- X w X O C u r. w w X CL V) m o C a) a a) — N as tL ;�. u. M(� .. m u. -p U. �n w •L > Q. ) •> CJ) i L p r > 7 -> CAN w >-V w >% — pm N d >+t r .2 Q N _ d +m,�° Nw � 3 -C M taw to �awQ t A •a1] 'O ,� a N C r z L L O U) L =' N >L Cn L A N � d �c O 1 3 N r .O n) o- Ce) co Q.- M CD >�..- � c C�Nf � O .,r- c :. J_ .0 N Ot 41 L tS O S 0 .Ct = — S _C n U a C 0 tVC .- E = C C) 0 0 m ch uN N C 0) N C 4) m ut C 6) t� N C i -jui 3: mCXUr Zw -vmM=r � mCL :CW mC].en � m '0u C n © a m to m (n d) I a' o j, c C c c c o c o yc a +- .- Ln 0 — — ,a o m t7 _ i i N pp m O ` Q L rn 1 s� C) C4 ' z c -h»d 0 Ln an n U - M M M. a C i m i m m a m a) -C wt, �) .. d �. O L m N L L — Q `� d L y Q O m m Q p.m a) UQ U Z3 V Z � ;- : m 0 -{-r .` L. Qcz n- m L O L � m C a C C O a i •� .a to 0 U � QC 4) V U � '> Go O O of 3 4-ml W _ U y d m m C N'Y C 3 O E 0 0 3 O :3 r.. N N co yJ mm m, q C Z L U V O E ? i U U 0 •E C S I 7 Vi•i 47 J co c 0 L CO J Q to O t oo U T Z a. U. Z 1O CL U- ro Y O � �+ _N y Q M .0.. U Din !d J � � " L :a 0 F' to Ml N io L i m Q CO M O O o 0 0 N m o � t 1T9 L t C N 0 (Z tl7 t/f— O 3 Y X al H > ca 0 i C � «�'3 O M. 0 m 0 m _0 to & ;; r0-. O 0 C C � +' co > '+o +r 0 e3: 0)* a. O." 3 O •n- dos C a O.L M ro a ++ to M Z L w vi— Cp 3 >Tco U � �° aa m 03 y ++ a► Oa V i° 7II�Ni. iL aCC m lua� a� zcmI- = v3 AU y i 3 W Ldo a0 d '�U roa'C 3 iQ 0 s- me o 'otn 0a a O 0� C w -r ylw > mC.2 O a A 3 Cd :3 r,o c o S o .rn � o ;: '_^ N '° = u o _• aii � ° N 3 O Os 3 � �onN U —JM a ::, - 3 �n -- Q'' acm C CL o 0 C - O �+ a M ar- pD C m a x >m G Q - C �C .q»ate. O co at 01 �.to coIts IA L m 5- C L � ++3 0 •C Q . ' ++— N t0 Y U i C d yl_ C 0) O m i UQtn W� UQmto --- -- -- ---- J — — --- — J 0 a� u a... u --� u L Q. CL CL L L Q m 3 i ° 3 oL '4— P )ti 0 c 3 e N �N O w U) C] m o a� U _ m . L ,? co •�- d rn ro >, •� -' m w 4 u- > • -, m > t O I m e E .O d, cz Lai a� a mm o � ro •� rA Zic3um Mp m Roe u. :3 v~i E e d u n o E U m L ._ co E 0 Z f FLLLU - vmi - _ m � L N� p v CL O 0y F.. t,,, M .+ L +_+ .+ .. L m m O �•3 rn� 3 °' t = � «. 3 nay 3ro '3oo ai N NY LO 0 O M y' .E O O M m 1 C -6j d O d �+ 1 m ++ O `O'D 4- m e ,�, ate+ Q�..0 C Z 0 3: •e co U m a :e+ � N E ro L i� m Q- L m •o .+ _ n W Q-'L m m M ,- tn n t0 O 41 CL m s e c 3 CL M N °� a m u •o•3 t Q-'o N m u c e•- CL•Q N 0 o a CL 4- e O d m p V C�' m " N•ems. w O 1L0 d d ,��. f�0 L L d m fA C'Q d U .., u m - u n. C L to N 'p t U'p to '- e d Q. U"D m m U n •- '�" C ,n �' O N L O L Q O C] L L•LL L LA O r L V O 4J L �•p•, L O N'O L O O N r m 3 L ... t3 O =' d ON m O.0 L.- 3 e u p= O ocf.: 3 s- e a u p =. .� u m :3 en CLNCL �. Nyt +.- m0. � � O 3 a� a 3 N_�t 'o ma. U� 3 Na N �o wQ'«- m p rm cm G a o. C3 ¢' o >a o m O m 0., -3�_ ,m n c �5 hwnp O p e O CO U U �' d u ! 4 � u (71 � fu 4) C! e L e L e L ++ a t.•c ¢ ..•c ¢ c ¢ ¢ n� _ (A > ani a) J 0 F- 0 CL a a o i0 O N 'p L L. .�, U tj U c c An d U cn �.! d T r' n V asCL 0- cu m 3 3 L. _ _ Y M CIO 03 LL L N 'C Z i Z U. 3 Y U .J 6' U _1 O' Z T m Z f6 Q N 4- 01 y c Q-p o � oM O O mu > WC ;Z, CL Q••� X X X :x r m N w-C > 0 to t► U Q. 3 X X X N ? N •— m Q- .-. . N OL L x x x x x x C31•IA O N L a •y d 0 w C0 ` co co m oo c c o -0 � v.3 N spi m :_^ .CL >� co Q d Q1 L N y-T -N!^ d w a)� d mNap-• O C= s+'aJ � a, �o as as QQ- E > t~n � a &- I.- ¢ w U X 'a� m to c o .3u•L L m ^.0 Y N�L p c > .'d > s t U .Y u �.2 n U 6 . m m .p m w m 0 N � M •— .c ate+ tC aD tD p O +' v Q V)w• V- (A CO V) (n (n co � W K U; NT3 V) r 3tn — U. z to UAV) � o 3 Co Ca o a m /v1�» q cc CA r N tD tD N mas c C7 _ 1� �Q:n O Q M N C > U CL CL a- L =M M =W M M 75 L L L +'> w } 0 t- i c o 0 e ' c o 0 v CL CL v '•�--J ti F- d = � U to F- . A-4 { ^ L CU M W {y, C) - O O O O O c Z Z i Z i. LL i j j (D Q• J 0' J cr Z T to Z Z T c U L y to 1 `�[ U .+ O N L to .p vi t to O .Q U 1. ++ �4),-0rrw tS L m C M O O tnw r0 • Q. � U �� '' O .Y G � y ��. O U O ry m m a+ r�i �_ V ._ C c 0-0 0.0E 'm LO ~ t C O L ri 3 '+ ),U 0 d p. p v l0 r..� V ++ t�D O ._ � O - SOY �•O L 7 N E co a +' N C N r v ►+ r u _� C p S Lw a1 r Y L O 0) .a Z+. 0. m to to C to a) U C O `�- O C to t O t > i._ C L . 0 �^ a al cc p m r r +o a r r .a r` L0 1- to v.p m m ro U m •.. _c a► v x a��a to c >. to to L >. to ►� o o i L o e L `Q L •� tL Y .E '% LT�C C 's. :3 :E U Y t37 .0 -- O d Y d Q10 C o 1] - C O p L- a) d o i- O d u E y 0 = 70 L 'O O = .N L M co S O O *, td7 > D O O > Z3 w tY t c t7J O t d d U. tin tD U.0 (A F-- -� to S] U �, to o = o Y 3 w w a U Y 3 a a Ca `m, c• C7•; $ o m v yN.� ©� �. . C hha O U U { N V _ C to i C = L wL 0 -0 Qcu UQ �- Q 0 F-- r` 0 L No L. O o 0 c�a -1-j v UC5C3 V U 7 t71 C71 ffl C71 Q1 Uf0 •L .N � � •a J c n m m Lcn x to N a3 _ tt1 t� U m U u0 i E u E u � CO rq ca n 1j w L _ U N 10 Ln C71 5CL J] E U m E O o to .11 D O' (� wi m La ® S - - O Ln m Ca f �o ca Z i LL N 4J tD E E _ a w Z _ m CL m �_ E X X car C.. L CO N N co r r 0 (A .+ tU .E�+ Q � O 4 tU C O V1 v U _ _U _ C _ x L- .. In •L y L to •t O lA to O L L m J7 N .Q f0 R7 � f0 10 •� a .o tp . •8 N tU w 4!w C> d d d tU O r0+ y..c L C '0 E E u •� C L . X O 0 - N p tE9 p N ro O Hf ttl d J` to C[I tow N a. to N U N N N 3 G ° C � - CL . 0; o >, O p cr O ... y N b O N ° d) C t� O O O r N ;. t � tAstn N U C _' C _' C -~- C - C i 7 3 O 7 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 m 0 4--J cz \rd L N i :3L O - � c�i U m C a a c QLa � C CO U U yn � •� co 'i _ rn a (, o Vd T1 m L � 1- "n R M 'o ^ DoE a L.L. n o Y x N to v J m rti t C Z L U U E !O U 1 E C , m J c T p .0 co O Z .Tn. iLU =w u N a O N'a J a 8 a d tv a a� " aaL c — m I c CL E CL m C L �v U '=4- �p C �' O O O w H3:: 3 61 � O U Q m U �+ � ^ L a C a y Q N m Y .T f0 �O, a y. •u C'�i L a a N 14 �— _ .N N 1 C 1 C ® U O cn a as a a 't3 E L im N " ^ L C N En d O m C 1 a L W O cni3o � 3 N ^ a U Ln U U � a m a p a -Do O► ^ H N� NM75 0 m :z C N H d V N - cc rn„ 1r� i 0. Q 0 -0 . ro 0 CLm a a) L 3 :3 N Q ' OL OL OL Q t: u c c c c `a/ L •— C N w N a) co 0 c Q ' U U m io L (D 0 0 U O m ++ L Ln O m 41 .;;LN O m Lan m O c m 0. to O c m CLL 0 c m p. m � It UDZufU — U =)Ztnu=w UDZV) U-W ..J 2 � mY O - i :: E Ln Z� u �� m . E LL nEc J 6 m O .c 0-0 Z f CLLLU a v m L r, •L O C i Q. -C m •L O M •� m U t. Q � C— .� y .Y a) k '2 M E C a p u'3 ,� c •3 — o o V� L =w r L y N U a) O U M O. OE Nv° �U v in _r =r HI rn H rn x 'p t. -C 0 - CL en ami O o- Em 4D T� (n UI al U N U'7; N e+ N th N 1.-(" a C a f C3 N Yc 10 �' t • � Q N co In tD N J O04 U, C SO 0 to 4. s ,. }o V ;t 1 1K "� ci 0 (� L '� Q. /L�.J ,1 L rr L N '. U L 1 C Ln C v) U an NN :w :mE CO 00 Ln E ro p i E U T•`'' L yroj x vl .. O ul tn > O ro O C ro mm =) d •0 d ro X o d ro �o x m � v. .}moi u- U �ZLn0: � roF- a� N dU 3 ro L ro cL o3 0 t � fl1 ro d TX .0 Z L, Z — 3 Q +' Q Ln t L d O I Q4- ® a_ � L3 a n 0) CL y rn E rn E rn E to •% 7 Q U d � X c 0 X C �; g1 4 x X G u U c ea x L- 3 a o •2 a oC C3 C m 3 w m'� i w i tA 00 i m •� cn Q)*E .o X d O L. d x� d XC d X ... co n ws E E .c CL CL E = L Ec L E N Ca d ao 0 U. 4 O d ro m d ro m d ro d N d .DU • Nr LL 4. DUUa. V) a. Cn ^ 0. lA � 'a 7 �h >. _ • 4 o A c v a " r o m a m on C wm m� 'v Uto t0 >` C d d d d i L L, L L Q -C -C _-C 0 F- rn � rn M !v 1 �. ' to C ? _ N N tn (gyp\�) r� V 1 a a LZ Iv to -O J V C7 U J a i- V; c c c c rn _oz 1 ..— R Qxr y n, /�l IJ zr a. (n p Q Q C �/� u co f0 U m 19 M O r0 N Z►- L "L 01 L U- 0 � � <r- d .o 0 tL0 D 7 .0 U 9 E .2 e, ;� •L 0 L c 0VI . O � Cn LL. L N O m to E rD U V X� rtl Q W. ©.J th U Q V L O M ■ .. .U - i cv � o _ Q L o •E d L 10 .c " 0 C Zi U U mai LL 1 w •E C a 1 J p-m L .0 co Z t ZL LLL u Z i C C T3 d; a 2 a+ ai C u c �' C o •- c o a� v cC:r 0) > 'd O >. d O U In � F- a .+ O O L cn w a+ 0 fC N U + CJ Q_ m to C (7Z.. r+ t Q.. C Y U L to N �"' m td's rp L f0 .� 1 y cn r° Co ° � cow CL:;; w � L c O E E C) u c u•� o u .c O cn r c c a� .p'E E O a c rn N ®c f] C � '` i"O L ? U C, m u O �� CAS aLi y a m a •v c o 0 0 '� V O N j L •L D +' O C) 01 co p 13 d C4 E CL Ca - a ®: t o c 1 CDri o C ® a a» c 0 .2 °� �Cld C: mm m W 0 O tp L L N 0 L L U (J U U i 0 F- o n. L a � [0 n L � p � • C_ � u N V V .C) L Q +) a+ Q (a) C 0 cf) rL� in m L �y U) ro rn U v. nLi cr 1.....' 1: .}...a LL tA E-• (� p L *- •0t"0 y 'J tp Cly m { »J w Z s- Z s U — m •� a � :3N E C Q co LL 3 J a• r0 p L pp U —j cr U _ p W 1] 6. C p n X F-• aj ] p " X iyU = ev C •E ° ce p C ai Mm ct°i m _� N a p. E E L t d LL d (D IVAI � atm N P C p = = N Q Y O O c p w m "d �o �% i-� 3 i d) ;o :+ N CD 40 cco �Od tA E E c ' G N C r 3 = > -C U a to iCn Ln 'p i tJ1 V1 3 U m C°a o a < o M n O Q>Q 4 CD C7 0 y C. co co co U to JE to� L ii s1O i fl 9 S] fl 1A �l7 Ilk t Y � v� tiles �t N N M C? iL S C Ile Yk } � Q a e � c 5 L 4,1 �% Nom' v�W �>. � �9opJ 4� N --i- z M cn he a. th p 1 � Y O O F L O • . / A U 0;ga 0 a z s ��aM zn Lai 9 � 0;W it zs W 11 a c , LM Ln _ r d mr Y d - � - ----�- -,�_�.._� .__..__..,._� • try .� o x � a w a CA� gwd a 2 � vow xmC d . {Y .Y. tn OnoW i.intm:.a °s>�. „. 1 E f N N C Z` J U l _ z % 6 Z C Www 1 sn a _ a ; v- r. c � � ot t co1 f M IL N m Ln _ T N a ` p U N cM 'N N N � L 9.. v1 _ U oCN^ O V R ;z OG z �oc X30 CIO _ 02 — 1 N .. a UN rn Loj ao A � x E h� x N � o oLn Ln 1 0 fn N CU 0) O 0 , N U vi , �". a gn cG zOa - mac V � z <0 ' V i AA O r_ � f �r in N a _ cm lT 0u CD N O = CD U ti �1 W 1 O o Q f } f W H O o c u d O m U Q 6 C3 Q 3 K. ID-4 41 M� W IT co 00 m M En 11► CL tn N a O O J W NQ E- Q w R> zc zoa � ci W Zn° OW Mi w ^ " aCIDq 1� �•+%��'/� :. -. �: -E .q � :•' s.� � _• ter+ may[� �.? 0. _� . _ • a{ �, _ ""`.�, :� err ,.j �' :'� r t _ Ft jig ti �4 --.tea la. .�T• t- +- _.} i r -++�1 h. '4 1 ♦ I:� t Tu _ ` 1 — � 3`- lam.. .... y f..i� 1•, Y i •t k t S I y; 7' S J 4 1 tA 1 R>z; Qcw M / ..,mo 0 V 3 w t 1,.j IL! • l• tq c . rIN ....., Nd .tom" • 4 F,` s 1 R 4'rF�sw� {�'�'� G�hsq+.�t,w t'C Rcv""'��S,�`+tt4 '�'S�7'',� f'r'\\ \*1'�4 7�`+"'. ♦a.-.it � ,", i a -z Y,. y J a��`�` is y ; .hw,ta.x .wf`�i�'r ✓��_.. � Jla#� a. i t.� 4v .* ..fri}+y+.. _ 4'jy M4. 9. �y�+h",�,,��+-'{`y/ I} �i''Y. ��`.•.,•.�;..�Y.a�1,�„St3� ►5��.='�• 4t� ,�L..#.qtr r: . � :•�L �.�t„ fr tiY'y'°-�\��, '�"kly. v-�•�S.,��f-�.��, ;4����`�Lfr Z,Lir y..� "w) � . � •,.,�.y. v.n.Y� y�,�{"'Y.;-"f.;+ t �,..K xLf_7� -^.tr��k}jy�'�"�6rwf,F;}. v �`E7s�fJj,✓+c.x4.�`•if ,\:: `K�elf��6:�c• "'";��''.5 '"ice "-c�..�f , � . ].L,..r C: � ' :�`,+ tF/� ham"` �' �.Y�•. �y��,(�1KM1�-,�/C. ..e YY�• Tr-sa4t �- J. til 1�I i�l 1�! l;•1 i!1 1 l I_1 �1 ,!` l . _ `f�, i�� _ ���r� J"""a7 m' • \` + •. �� A i ,. .... - � � , , � ,;_, .. ` � - �� __ . � � ,� , f-- d .,; ��� i � ' ��" � .k f� � �.. � ��/ . '�, =._ ,,. � ' ' ,�. ��. �... MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council August 29, 1985 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director,�r14114 �' Community Development SUBJECT: NPO #1 Fee Waiver Request Emmett Whitaker of NPO #1 appeared at the last City Council meeting to request a fee waiver in behalf of the NPO for a text change to the Comprehensive Plana The NPO would like to modify the language relating to the extension of Ash Avenue. Based upon what my staff has advised me, I believe that the request being considered would involve a text change as well as anamendment to the Transportation Plan Map. In the past, the Council has granted fee waivers to the NPO's-for appeals. No text changes; have been presented previously, as a result, no waivers considered. The fee for a text change is $450.00, while a map change is $650.00. t I recommend that the Council allow NPO #1 to file a request for a Comprehensive Plan Change pending a recommendation by the CCI and Planning Commission concerning a waiver policy. NPO #1 has indicated that the revision which they seek will not be pursued until the spring of 1986 review period. Therefore, the immediacy of the request no longer exists as the NPO needs to develop an application along with direction concerning the outcome sought. No action is needed at this time. I will request that the CCI and Planning Commission evaluate criteria for fee waiver requests for NPO's if the Council wishes. (WAM:br/1782P) r MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council August 29, 1985 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director,,/�f4' Community Development SUBJECT: SW Corridor Study Policy Committee The SW Corridor Study Policy Committee is evaluating the transportation issues in the area and the need for a Westerly By—Pass. The Committee will meet on September 5, 1985 at 7:30 A.M. Councilor Tom Brian has served as Tigard's Policy representative since the Committee was initiated. _Due to Councilor Brian's recent physical problems, I am concerned that he may not be able to attend. Although I plan to attend as an observer. I cannot represent the City as a voting member as Tigard's representative must be an elected official. Therefore, I recommend that the Council appoint an alternate to Councilor Brianshouldhe be unable to attend this and future meetings (WAM:br11784P) x i mto METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT Providing Zoo,Salic waste and Lau!Government Services M TIR ni August 26, 1985 527 S.W.Harr St. pads d.Omen 97201.5287 (5W)2ua616 Councilor Tom Brian City of Tigard fuck Gustafson P. 0. Box 23397 Exwmrw 0*= Tigard, OR 97223 Metro Council b„ieeanner Dear Toms P"="90— There will be a meeting of the Southwest Corridor Study Pid"rdWa`Cer policy Committee on Thursday, September 5, 1985, at 7:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at Portland Community College, Sylvania Campus, 12000 S. W. 49th Avenue, ea,ole Building CC, .Cedar Room adjoining the cafeteria (see DatridI enclosed map) . l n Ciard'ct 3 r The purpose of this meeting (agenda enclosed) will be to Cock p;b_kk make a decision on the recommendations of the Technical Outram Advisory Committee regarding the establishment of a T=Ddardin Citizen Advisory Committee and .a public involvement DWrid$ process (see attached Southwest Corridor Study Overview ckT%- packet) and to review technical data developed to date concerning: Shatron Kelley Dutrid7 - Changes in corridor travel patterns as a result of Hardy Myers expected growth to the year 2005; DWHd9 - Extent and nature of transportation problems remain- r ing beyond the implementation of the currently adopted Regional Transportation Plan; and Alternative concepts to be evaluated in the remainder of the study to address the outstanding. problems. Oram If you have any questions, please contact Andy Cotugno or Leigh Zimmerman at Metro. RSVP to Lois Kaplan at 221-1646. erely, Rick Gustafson Executive Officer RG/LZ/gl 4197C/D5-2 Enclosures D r 'f ," ' -,•` '�q_v �`afi a .�. .,� y x 4 r* >F.. ra ?• �,. p "•3.t m Er bias��ms's e l� �'-..�F'S I'll- � y .� �{:���r �y 1 L"t't s"-u•�+. @3'�...f i '�' 's t 5� s t-?�` �'kC-c�'+t,�-.,'T "+'��.,k a4,i ��.qF '�y � � {J/p�t` i? ..� !'?� #��` 4 't�- w„ k � ^:€ f� y 4n-�'N��'t :r�'.�4 � ��{.� �`s.'$'�. `9 f .'`� �]'7' :'`ar. a�•� ET?."'f'�i,� 1��"F�,�'a�i''3r,.'�5�`c..���»�'� � ��\ �. t4,_tya.-:.�.yA�,M,.K .�..�. �._..1 1'.;�a'#i�'f`h'X 'LIF . 1 teHt- y�c ai4 5.n ,.0 ' „,,:e'' ' Y "r -::�,"t..,. uv Y t ,i �.'"+- <'{ '� f t 1•,i �� � 's F..fss1 1. ..-ss;:.i�' , "°.x. ro ,''`:v`."'e .o.: '- '--�rr�W" 't. "i'� t ::,� r. .t.K.,, 4 >Ss ra - -._ - _p.. # cert• 2r` r t n,>«'$4Y'„- ,: �c,.wit g ' S "`M €`15�f ti�aR :F.q; ,•.3�+5�..E.'C^t,* .;p.�a'�,,.��,�J > d,..��}' j "•�';�:` "� 7�� ,. w�• �,. )Es ( r *„ 'x p� in. yi.. 'S �.+J �..... �*.�t� �� c}h .. `.,fes -,q."'- h. i'-rfr ti✓'.1 y y y :.,„ �...1* ",t- � '.;z'1}' ''"^ sz'1`°' � L. '`" �w. yr 51 - -] ::.r- .�i s� t :. : Z'j `j .a 1: .:,.i wbfyA"•>-Ma—��+ e4^„'' X�*F4lj _j4 ci sz " � - •.t. a.- . a:. .; F; r _ �g g; f „7.'c �i+#'4` 'r { i..•4s`3t. .4.' s'u '2.ta .4 tR Ls et.. fF`jt...ti to >bys t c x`s•ya,��st'�7, rn �-x `cq}�� 1"#xF""f`'A .i b ,.+ ':r`r s. 6 e .,s:'7-`' . -sJt.•,�**� k,a �.,. �. t.z�,# k� 'PTA, � �' ' f E # t -t-' � I J '�?-�• s meat �r�i^aL. r.-,aF+- tr--<t�"�'ucaa Y�' sF�;� +�:.,(-w,�".� � F„��,,+�,��:�r- t:p„"'� t � .r tS,"' ,`•.,.n a rs -,1':4 �., ,�4 4. "4 �r�'���tf!'Ar.ai�.�1 3*.,:a3 a C' t�%t } Fy.'''>�+r,�T..f�}i,C���,,,r,."-�� �=. _ y i. i s { i• CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ` AGENDA OF: 9/4/85 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED. 9/28/85 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: COUNCIL/STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP PREPARED BY: Bob Jean REQUESTED BY: Council DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Training Workshop for Council and Key Staff, Saturday and Sunday, October 12 and 13, 1985. INFORMATION SUMMARY Per the Council Policy Calendar and the 8/19 meeting survey, the weekend of October 12 and 13 would work for all key staff, and Council except for Councilor Scott who indicated her availability on week days only. Mary Himmel is available as the Trainer/Facilitator. Room and Board is estimated at $500. Trainer costs are $900 plus mileage. Funds are budgeted. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Hold Training Workshop as discussed 10/12 6 10/13. 2. Schedule alternate date during the work week. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve Training Workshop for 10/12 and 10/13, 1985, (0958p) r � � ¢ 85 � 8 � 8 oT CL gn ra O Ch rau � C k L a n 0 m w O Q •.r L w � ¢ - 8S -4 8N $ J O W W ~ u ai E L t p pp pp 41 L O.- Z .tiZ' W � 0 SO � O � �t 8 O O F� OCD M N N `.. �L�J �. N CL `OS C I • A ;. .U? to wo u W 9 w C-4 , at M Q W - a L 40 C6 CL is a co 4E so r4l p .� C w ca 4A 43W43 .14 ` ¢ °c i LL� W o th in 6 Y L 0 II W ar � w ® O -•W J d e� X Y• M C 00 N N N N N O NO to WpQQt- CDD Q 88S8CM S g : ; z W -1 � #t a � «. L 06 C S a � era 8s � $qr N w I M N N L •C S0- h 0 U.) 41 L6 M C� cw 40 u AJ C 0 CL LL777 v m v �-+ U x a 4w C 0 in t a (a J y L c Om � � � O C e�nbv�3 M y L 1 LO Ch W \C4 m F- in O C O M t0) ) A I W m S Lr) S O N 1`� tp S f6 ¢ L J cc cr 4N ids Lo HW m O co coif u� O .N•� r tto t*, ++ ¢ a CP a Ln Q d W A O •A W p a E c oe AS Lo S a r CR 0L mr aE C tW� ti3 QQ Ln LO QOOBQQ / .�]' �QQ+ N O OI G7 W M Ln 8 v � a Om MN .aN .O 5 .0 13 cc 0. a .•r W Occ en w C ® Li e e rd +E T •A is v o a-o V 3 CL LO .A •o w o W W .Mv+ ���Cg+ jC w d .. .'art a45 •. O C I�Jlsa, 14w W H co C44- ..0ai aa q �f pO 4m c 41 401, al A a -j n to c1cF N W A G tab C Ad ~ C N1O i O W I .A in E t0 a8 " ¢ L „ N- a w vf: `da � a z jo WLv, X .J A.r ..+ d o u Fa ;! ro 7 a E ?QQQ, ix t c1*9 F- t�a oc .T cror� to b� i¢- tg ++ d•C T to yw QQ QO 51 OQ �Q[I Qj O a N •M++ �pWy I.- G co frl t7 � .� t� 1 OM o 4-1 579 O 01.4 O a' We N W Lo r8 CK cc 44 M a 0 .A V M N 'a6 N to •.L 4w 14 r l _ N + B „t ed � co � Oy .ts 41 t aro : tic LM v SM Oe L • tS�Yn.►, A Qto OO NN %0m Mtn to ¢ U 11 C4 71— O O u wl V o, ��1 V� U 1 .tend rd V d r+ v` '`�. 1 ro a tiCL � m 0t mMap o • tet L u C oca C. ul in Y•..111 ._Cmd N NN M . . - N w a � a '. .+ W a .•p ty.. L U Ch M m U 3 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and City Council September 3, 1985 ;t FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: Council--Staff Training Workshop, ct. 12-13 Mary Himmel is available to serve as the Trainer/Facilitator for the above Workshop. The program will be run through the League of Oregon Cities Council Training Program, but will be tailored to Tigard situations. A four part =. program is involved: t 1. Sat. A.M., Council and Key Staff, Develop the Current Situation 2. Sat, P.M. , Council and Key Staving, Improving Council-Staff Working : Relationship 3. Sun. A.M. , 'Council and Administrator, Improving Council-Administrator Relationships 9. Sun. P,M., Council and Administrator, Improving Council--Community ' Relationships It is felt that the intensive nature of the program can best be accomplished in a concentrated form away from phones and families. The Flying M Ranch in McMinnville has been tentatively booked for our Workshop. (83:pm/0968p) J Y MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO, Honorable Mayor and Council August 22, 1985 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: Council Staff Relations Trai ng Workshop Per our discussion at the 7/29 Council meeting and on 8/19, T reviewed with Executive Staff the idea of a Council and Executive Staff training workshop this Fall. The purpese of the retreat would be to work on Council-Staff relations and communications. A Saturday with Council and Executive Staff and Sunday with just Council and the City Administrator was discussed. October 12-13 has been approved by Council and works for Executive Staff. Two nearby Conference Centers have been suggested; Menucha near Troutdale and Flying M Ranch near McMinnville. Mary Himmel has been suggested as the trainer and facililator. Tentatively the schedule would fall into four broad categories to allow a maximum of interaction and discussion in each: Sat. AM Departmental Reviews and Status Reports (Community Workloads, priorities and Goals) Sat. PM Council-Staff Relations Training (Morale & Productivity) Sun. AM Council-Administrator Relations Training (policy Calendar and Reporting) lations (Open Discussion and Workshop) Sun. PM Council-Community Re (83:bs/0951p) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and City Council August 22, 1985 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: City Administrator Oregon P1 ing Institute Training, 10/3 & 10/4, Eugene Per -Council -intent on out-of-town training/travel costs, the - following Training Request is submitted for your approval. Funds have been budgeted in City.Administration which cover this training. Specifically the agenda topics of interest to me are: 10/3 8:30-Noon Making More Effective Verbal Presentations (Improving Verbal Communications skills), PSU Professor Ben Padrow 10/3 1:30-3:00 Planning and Administering Urban Unincorpor- ated Urbanizable Areas 10/3" 3:15-4:45 Setting Land Use Fees (, 10/4 8:30-10:00 When Is Taking A Taking (Condemnation and Conditions of Development) 10/4 10:30-Noon Administrative and Quasi-Judicial Decisions 10/4 Noon Major Issues in Oregon Land Use and Water Planning, Rep. Tom Throop 10/4 1:30-3:00 Administering Legislative Changes and Administrative Rules 10/4 3:15-4:45 Public Meeting Skills for Decision Makers Estimated Costs Are As Follows: Two-Day Registration (incl. Fri. Lunch) $ 55.00 Thursday Night Lodr r,c3 30.74 Thursday Lunch 5.00 Thursday Dinner 15.00 Friday Breakfast 5.00 Sub-Total $110.74 Gas (Fill-Up 1/2 Tank Eugene 10.00 r TOTAL $120.74 ACTION: Motion to approve City Administrator attendance at Oregon Planning Institute Training Workshop October 3-4, 1985. A T. (83:bs/0951p) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON L� �3 TO: Mayor &,City Council September 3 1985 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: Summary of Council Meeting Calendar 1985 DATES H ATTENDING NOTES 0 Not Sure) 9/4 4 9/9 4iF 9/11 3* (Scott?) 9/16 4# 9/23 3* (Edin) 9/30 3 (Edwards?) *NOTE: Councilor Brian Medical Absense thru September? 10/12-13 4 (Scott?) 10/14 5 v 10/21 3 (Cook; Edwards?) 10/28 5 11/6 5 (Budget Committee) 11/11 5 11/18 4 (Edwards?) 11/25 5 12/0. 4 (Edwards?) 12/9 5 12/16 4 (Edwards?) 1/8 4 (Edwards?) (83:pm/0970p) '_z C11Y Of 11GAR0 URLra)N COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY / AGENDA OF: September 4, 1985 AGENDA ITEM M: DATE SUBMITTED September 4, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Notice of Decision MLP 10-85, Ray and Jo Ann Wolfe PREPARED BY: Community Development REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is the Notice of Decision for MLP 10-85 by Ray and Jo Anne Wolfe to divide a 1.68 acre parcel into twoparcNls located at 9070 SW Edaewood St. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Receive and file. 2. Remove from consent agenda and call up for Council review at a later meeting. SUGGESTED ACTION - Receive and file. CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 10-85 APPLICATION: Request by Ray and Jo Anne Wolfe to divide` a 1.68 acre parcel into two parcels of 0.59 and 1.09 acres on property zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5. units/acre) and located .at 9070 SW Ecgewood St. (WCTM 2S1 20C, T.L. 1500 and 1501) DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED' the above described application subject to -certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background No previous land use proposals have been reviewed by the City relating tothis property. 2. Vicinity;Information The surrounding properties consist of single family residences on large lots. The R-4.5 zone applies to thi's area. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The property extends from Edgewood Street on the north to McDonald Street on the south. Access is provided via a gravel driveway from Edgewood Street to two residences located near the middle of the. property. Public sewer service is not available to this area and both houses have a septic system. The applicant intends to divide the property into two parcels with one house on each parcel. The septic tanks for each house are within the corresponding parcel but the specific location of the drainfields is unknown. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a: If the drainfield for- the northern-house lies 'within ;the " proposed southerly parcel, the lot line should be adjusted or an easement provided. b. A joint use agreement is necessary if the common driveway is to continue to be used: c., 4Edgewood Street is classified as a local street requiring a =w. a the existing right-aof-way is 40 f4atan�additior�al 5 foot ddtcation is necessary. a saftcr OF, `- MLP.`IO-85 - PAGE 1 d. McDonald Street is classified as a major collector with a 60 foot right-of-way requirement. An additional 10 feet right-of-way dedication is required. e. A street opening permit is required for any street =.. improvement (eg. new driveway apron) occurring within the public right-of-way. The Building Inspection Division notes the drainfield location should be determined. The Washington County ' Health Department recommends that an easement be recorded for the southern parcel to allow the owner of the northern parcel the right maintain and repair the existing septic system. No other comments have been received. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposed partition is consistent with the requirements of the R-4.5 zone for setbacks and lot size. Since the southern house will continue to use the existing driveway, the 'Code requires that a 15 foot wide easement be provided for access to Edgewood Street. Since this partition will rectify an existing non-conforming situation (two residences on one lot) and there will be no further development as E a result, half street improvements are not necessary at this time. A non-remonstrance agreement to participate in any street or sanitary sewer local improvement districts- (L.I.D.) will be required in lieu of e half street construction. i 3 t C. DECISION The Planning Director approves MLP 10-85 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDING THE PETITION. 2. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW McDonald Street frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be tied to the existing right--of-way centerline as established by County Survey No. 20, 339. The .dedication document shall be on City Forms and approved by the Engineering Section. DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED. 3. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW Edgewood Street frontage to increase the right-of--way to 25 feet from centerline. The dedication document shall be on City Forms and approved by the Engineering_ Section, DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED. 4. The* "basis of bearings" for the Partition Survey shall be County Survey No. 20,267., which is part of the :,Tigard Field Survey Network NOTICE OF DECISION - MLP to-85 - PAGE 2 5. The partition survey and legal descriptions shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. THE CITY SHALL RECORD THESE DOCUMENTS AFTER THEY ARE APPROVED AND A COPY SHALL BE r FORWARDED TO THE APPLICANT. 6. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be recorded for the common driveway. The easement for the southern parcel -shall .be a minimum of 15 feet in width. This agreement shall be executed on a City <form and approved by the Planning Director prior to recording. FORMIS ENCLOSED. 7. A non-remonstrance agreement for future street and sewer line improvements shall be executed and recorded after City approval (Contact Randy Clarno for further information). S. An easement covering the southern parcel which retains the right of ,the owner of the norther parcel to maintain and repair the existing septic _system shall be approved by the Planning Director and recorded with Washington County. (Contact Keith Liden for - further information). 9. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. 0. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: { The applicant & owners Owners of record within the required distance _CSX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON SepteMbex 9, 1985 UNLESS AN APPCAL IS FILED. 3. Aooe&l: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. 9-9-85 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash,, PO Box Z007, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 639-4171. 8/30/85 4, William A. Monahan. Director of Commnity Development DATE APPROVED (KSLpm/1787P) NOTICE OF DECISION - MLP 10-85 - PACE 3 SEE Map on reverse side l - • r .M • " LJ ' a IP �. tf.+ ...._.�. - it .,fit - "i�yil.. ---'�l+Y�)! t(y t ll l7dl 1<' 7S'..t I ;(,{•��fSlgiif9:l.+�..g .r. �'i i �9 C c 16 4t V- St V . _t 0 filz ie It tj Io OK r' tj Aj 1-0 43 R, m f r �: Ka Ka �: s R4,1K V ri K it ipa Lt N ® F' �• a''CS6 ,1 1 '� �` s .J .� ice.' +rtU +i� >� �a 't' '� � i.•� '� ! iii � N cc $+FM drJ 1 __ +6 �. ass :� tJ 133 51 49 +; .Yn N m µ S. * :-. I .S @ 1 6 C' u Ka ;; dY � � 9 41) i �[ r .tc - z W � z � .♦ 1 3� � 9 ao- Z :0 ' `r. F '� yr.. +��.r {�� �+ \ 1 .1 i� x ice: .Q] .,�r(( -V •' 47 it -tj^ EC o^ fk1 4tu li I AN 4Z AQ it, .1 K as {? P. I {i� m : i N K arJ 'S is fi s G fi fi C`, 1 T 1,4 S .—. M Cl! CO OQ � Q ^ u -kJ In C13 lid 44 :P .S:J s.=1 tia i"6 �3 Cri 'fir v % i6 4rJ Fi •�� ,l l 1 .l h n Cl 1i i ie iQ ie K 1•. Vii' k{ ' ' i v ,' `�' i I $ w - '� �; 'I K 1 I m it •ilia) � _ .. � m N t .� S Oi `K • s x 99 .01 49 sn WA n1 441 i� IMQ its �s S a �° � {� l� •;� � c` 1 H F4 L C N .n e— ie�` W� Q -D 04 e H a 0 HE mx is -i + 1 H Ri� 0aZF � 241 11 H dpi' OK Y I e �. 1 t1= I 43 ! Clerf OF WNW JOHN E. COOK Mayor P.O.BOX 23397 BURNHAM&ASH AVE. TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PHONE:639-4171 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0: Bill Monahan, Dir, of Comm. Dev. August 28, 1985 FROM: Duane Roberts, Administrative Planner Herewith is the English-language version of the economic development pamphlet prepared by ,staff in conjunction with the Japan—American Conference of Mayors and Chamber of Conference Presidents. The pamphlet will be included in the packet of materials given out to conference delegates. According to conference organizers, Tigard is the only area city, besides Portland, the host city, to prepare informational material in either Japanese or English for the conference. The Japanese version was prepared by two volunteer translators. One has done translation for the Portland Development Commission, Nike, and other area organizations. Before coming to Portland, she worked for the American Embassy in Tokyo as a trade show consultant. The other translator teaches Japanese at West Linn High School. Both have master's degrees from American Universities. Knowledgable people, namely the two persons identified below, advise that the Japanese translation is "much better written" than the English original. r Two highly qualified Japanese businessmen living and working in Portland metropolis served as advisors to the project. One, Mr. Kumashiro, is Vice President of Ataka Lumber and, inter alia, also serves as board chairmanof the Japanese School of Portland The other, Mr. Kawakami, is General Manger of NEC American. Particularly significant, is that he played a key role in selecting Hillsboro as the site for the NEC electronics plant presently under construction there. The advisors reviewed the English and Japanese first drafts of the pamphlet, and offered many helpful comments and suggestions, Most of these were incorporated into the final draft. Jeannie Caswell of the Tigard Chamber reviewed and cotunented on the English first draft. Excluding staff time, the cost of the pamphlet and the mayor's business card were: $50 for word processing (in Japanese), and $250 for (two—color) ( printing (500 copies) . Based on prevailing Tates for quality work ($400 and $500 per page, respectively, for Japanese Translation Service and Phillip Kano) the value of the translators' "in kind" contribution was approximately $800 to $1,000. Initial distribution of the pamphlet is as follows: Mayor's Conference 120 copies OEDC-Tokyo Office 100 Tigard Chamber of Commerce 20 Grubb 6 'Ellis 30 TVEDC 20 Undistributed 210 As requested, listed below are the names and addresses of the volunteers who Participated in the project:_ Tadakazu Kumashiro Executive Vice President Ataka Lumber 101 SW Main Suite 1450 Portland 97204 1 Kuninori Kawakami NEC America' Vice President and General Manager 14250 NW Science Park Dr. Portland 97229 i 4 Noriko Huruse Roberts 2758 SE 28th P1. Portland 97202 Hitomi Tamura Foreign Language Dept. West Linn High School, West "A" West Linn, OR '97068 (DR:pm/1781P) ` MAYOR'S CONFERENCE PAMPHLET Tigard and the I-5 Economic Development Association welcome you to Oregon and to the Japan-US Mayor's Conference Located, on the southwestern edge of Portland,-Oregon,"a city made prominent in Japan by the 'popular TV `series "From Oregon with Love", the municipality of Tigard is, a prosperous and growing community, It is one of six communities that make up the Interstate-5 economic development Association. In addition to highly attractive living conditions, the I-5 area has seven major industrial parks and a significant amount of vacant land available for commercial and industrial development. Local government officials, business representatives, and the community at large have made' a solid commitment to provide services that are needed for development and to seek ways to enhance business opportunities. Tigard's current budget for street, sewer, and drainage improvements to the amount of $5 million is illustrative. VACANT INDUSTRIAL LAND Tigard 101 Hectares Lake Oswego 40 Sherwood 179 Tualatin 324 t Wilsonville 391 Aurora 40 Labor Force Tigard's labor force is young and well-educated. More than 40 percent have attended a college or university. A work force of well over 100,000 people is within a 20 minutes driving radius of Tigard and the I-5 corridor. Taxes Tigard's tax rate is among the lowest in the metropolitan area. The low rate i is -attributable to sound fiscal management and a strong economic base. -' Industrial and commercial properties represent a large portion of the tax base. State taxes compare favorably with those of other west coast states. Significantly,- Oregon's "unitary" system of taxation was repealed last year, with a view toward promoting overseas investment in the state PROPERTY TAX RATE Per $1,000 of Assessed Value Tigard, Oregon $1.32 ' Vancouver, Washington 3 .24 Camas, Washington 3.58 Hillsboro, Oregon 3.81 Gresham, Oregon 4.48 Beaverton, Oregon 5.52 Portland, Oregon 6.43 SOURCE: The Business Journal, January 7, 1985. [ Housing Housing in Tigard and the I-5 area is plentiful and affordable. A majority of housing is less than seven years old. A single family house averages around 1,824,000 yen. Average rent for a two bedroom apartment is 76,800 yen. All residential areas are served by convenient neighborhood commercial centers that are within a few minutes walk or drive. Schools With its nine elementary, two middle, and one high school, Tigard is committed to high standards of excellence in its school system. Computer education programs are offered in every school, and beginning this year, courses in the Japanese language will be offered in the high school. The addition of Japanese to the curriculum reflects a community desire to foster cultural understanding and awareness. i Higher education is available from seven institutions located within a 15 km radius of the I-5 area, Two of these, Portland State University and the Oregon Graduate Center, offer programs of study for people employed in the high -technology fields. Portland Community College, with an enrollment of 14,000, is a nearby community college that 'features excellent training programs in business, computer education, and machine shop technology. The school works _closely with business to provide special services and training. Tigard and the other communities in the I-5 area are just 15 kilometers from the Japanese School of Portland, which offers Saturday classes for children of Japanese families who are located in the metropolitan area. The curriculum is set by the Japanese Ministry of Education, and the textbooks are the same as those used in public schools in Japan. Shopping and Services Tigard is served by ' several major shopping centers. Largest of these is Washington Square, a regional shopping center which includes 115 large and k' small stores. The newest is Loehmann's Plaza which has been honored for design excellence by the American Institute of Architects. Two major hospitals, St. Vincent and Meridian Park, are located within ten minutes driving time of central Tigard. Each hospital is equipped with the most modern facilities and offers a full range of health care services. Tigard is also favorably located with respect to air service. The Portland International Airport is only 25 minutes by freeway from Tigard. A direct flight to Narita departs every Tuesday. Recreation and Culture One of the strong attractions of the I-5 area is the easy access to recreational and cultural amenities. The Tualatin and Willamette Rivers flow through the area and offer a full range of water activities, including swimming, fishing, boating and windsurfing. Other major recreational attractions are golf, tennis, and horseback riding. The Mt. Hood 'recreation area,, featuring year-round snow skiing, is 110 km. to the east, and the scenic Oregon coast, with its white sand beaches, is 130 km. to the west. Tigard is especially known for its modern Performing Arts Center located near I-5. Construction is presently underway on a combined civic center, library, and community park development project with a completion date of early 1986. Tigard and the ;six 'other cities composing the I-5 Economic Development Association cordially invite you to consider the investment opportunities that they have to offer to Japanese business and- industry. When you return home, we would be grateful for your, assistance in informing businesses that may be considering locating in the U.S. of Tigard and the I-5 Association's active program to bring Japanese and other companies to our area. (DR.pm/1718P) L �. M E M O R A N D U M CITYOF T1�A WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON TO: Bill Monahan FROM: Jerry McNurlin SUBJECT: Ima Scott request on our use of GM Training Center DATE: Sept. 4, 1985 The garage has always been on the mailing list of classes offered at the GM Training Center. We do take advantage of these classes , which are from one to three days in length and free of charge to the city. In the last two years the garage personel have attended eleven diff- erent classes from Electrical Component to Automatic Transmissions. We do_plan to continue to attend training classes as they become available to us. JM/tb 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.SOX 23397TK3ARD.OREGON 97223 PH:838.4171 m Z C-4 O 1-4 Z G7 O W H OO r ` cn n +ter w c u: > n< u+ t~ h } LJ h X NO CY) (fi W (B_U) (n W r H N H W W W W EN+ W 41 .�-� N W +� O N � p H � T W V U. cc w W a L o 0 Ix ttS ix to '.E T IAJ L M O i * rn T�i1cc G ' O *c W i*c n L.) yk n o n 3 �k ►��• G Q C %0 N uj W Ry t>, Ct cal i w a � ax 3 - c4n41 NOT cn v T T Id 14 N 33 m Nit? to u'! in 0 a. L aO O Cai 1 Ob tp.a ... 0 m' ' 5;1 a�1cc sic n o 0- m � � N (n 4. r mU ,-� U cn 1 1 Z 8 ZLIH L CLI Ll M L L -4 -, LOQ C) Q TO .+ C) r" 2 O O a m C m 30 m a m O M 3 U u „ is * n. Unto 1� to opt 4 4 e a a c co N L 41 u u to on 07 'r—'C at t6 ,o { y % Y o :3 s a i J) 2 co i r4. �