City Council Packet - 01/14/1985 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an
1 v REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate
F JANUARY 14, 1985, 7:30 P.M. sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available,
v� FOWLER JUNIOR RICH ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start
H 10865 SW WALNUT of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items
are asked to be kept to 2 minutes or less; longer
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
matters can be set for a future Agenda by con-
tacting either the Mayor or City Administrator.
7:30 1. REGULAR MEETING:
f 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items
7:35 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please)
7:40 3. LAND VACATION PROCESS ORDINANCE NO. 85-
Legal Counsel
7:50 4. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY CODE AMENDMENT - ORDINANCE NO. 85-
City Engineer
7:55 5. COUNCIL INITIATED STREET VACATION DISCUSSION
City Engineer
8:10 6. HALL BLVD./BURNHAM LID DISCUSSION
City Engineer
8:30 7. COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BOND DISCUSSION
City Engineer
8:45 8. LID FINANCE POLICY DISCUSSION
Finance Director
9:00 9. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
{ that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
9.1 Approve Council Minutes: January 7, 1985
9.2 Approve OLCC Application: Tigard Thrtftway, 14365 SW Pacific
Highway, Tigard, Oregon - PS Application - Change of Ownership
9.3 Approve Extension Request for Completion of Sidewalks b Pathways In
Bellwood III Subdivision With Conditions
9.4 Approve b Authorize Signatures:
o MLP 5-84 Street Dedication - SW Cascade Avenue - Roger Belanich
o Street Dedication Compliance Agrmt/Performance Bond - Sw 114th Ct.
(the Fountains)
9.5 Approve Resolution No. 85-03 Accepting Copper Creek Phase IV
Improvements And Accepting_IYear Maintenance Bond
9.6 Authorize Letter To PUC Commissioner Requesting Extension of Order
i83-860 to 4/1/86 for Railroad Crossing (72nd Avenue/Mercer Ind.)
9.7 Receive and File
o Update On CPA 23-84 Subsidized Housing Issue
o Retirement Study Report
9.8 Approve Submission of CDBG Application
9.9 Approve 6 Authorize Signatures: Crow Lease Agreement/Old City Hall
9:05 10. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff
9:10 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will 90 into
Executive
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1)(d) to
ss labor
relations issues.
10:00 12. ADJOURNMENT
lw/2344A
COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 14, 1985 - PAGE 1
T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL. CALL : Present: President of Council Tom Brian; Councilors: Phil
Edin, Jerry Edwards, Ima Scott; City Staff: Frank Currie,
City Engineer; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Jerri Widner,
Finance Director (left at 8: 18 P.M.); and i._ureen Wilson,
Deputy City Recorder.
In the absence of Mayor Cook, President of Council, Tom Brian, chaired
the meeting.
2. CALL. TO STAFF AND COUNCIL. FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS
a. City Engineer requested item .1 "Labor Relations Contract
Approval" be added to non-agenda.
b. President Brian requested item . 2 "Civic Center Budget Discussion"
be added to non-agenda.
3 . CALL TO AUDIENCE:
a. Dave Atkinson SW Summerfield Drive resident, questioned what was
discussed regarding Durham Road at the Administrator's Conference
reported in the Oregonian. President Brian reported that three
Councilors were present at the meeting and tVie portion of Durham
Road discussed was in Tualatin not Tigard.
b. Scott Gilchrist, NPO #7 rFpresentative and member of Progress
Bible Church, discussed the plans for 130th Avenut: and asked
Council to agree to hear a CPA on that property out of sequence
(moving it up on the agenda of the Planning Commission) and waive
the application free for, the church. tie stated that until the use
of 130th was decided, the church would not be able to implement
any expansion plans.
President Brian requested the church file their CPA request with
the City. After staff review, the item can then be acted on by
the Council. He stated Council would try to respond within Mr,
next couple of Council meetings.
4. LID FINANCE. POLICY DISCUSSION
a. Finance Director discussed at length the policies for the Finance
and Closure section of the new LID policy manual. The following
policy statements were modified, or noted for further discussion
by consensus of Council present as follows (words underlined were
added, words in brackets were deleted) :
6.2.3 The interest rate charged will be the net effective
interest rate of the bond sale plus 2% for administrative
expenses, i.e. , recording the lien at Washington County,
billing costs, etc.
Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1985
Y
6.2.4 Interest on the assessment shall being to accrue ten
working days after the passing of the ordinance spreading
the assessments for all property owners, whether requesting
installment payments or paying in cash.
6.2.5 If the City does not receive an application to pay in
installments within ten working days of notification of
assessment, it will be assumed the property owner will be
paying in cash.
6.2.8 If an applicant to pay in installments [has demonstrated a
delinquent payment history] is current on. all payments on
other LIDs, sewer bills or property taxes on the assessed
property, [the City shall limit the amount financed] the
applicant shall be eligible to pay in installments._
6.2.12 Criteria shall be discussed at a later meeting.
6.2.14 Council wished a fixed fee be established with a percent of
the total bill also being due. Staff will return later
with more information.
6.2.16 This will be discussed at a later date, Council's intent
is to protect the City for one year before the contractor
is released from liability on any development.
Finance Director left: 8:18 P.M.
5. ORDINANCE NO. 85-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL. SETTING
FORTH PUBLIC LAND VACATION PROCESS, SE-1 TING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
a. Legal Counsel reported on the current problems experienced by
staff in processing vacation requests and recommended Council
approve the ordinance which would set up a process which should
address vacation problems before the public hearing process.
b. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Scott to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
C. Mr. Jerry Cach, 15970 SW Sunrise Lane, mentioned his concerns that
the new process would lengthen the time required for a vacation
and make it too expensive.
d. After further discussion, President Brian requested Mr. Cach
submit recommended changes to staff for review.
6. ORDINANCE NO. 85-02 AN RY
SEORDINANCE ENDING THE Y NA
SEWERAGE RULES ANDREGULAT ONS ANDDECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
a. City Engineer recommended Council approve amending ordinance which
would set out City fees in more detail.
b. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1985
7. COUNCIL_ INITIA,LD STREET VACATION DISCUSSION
a. City Engineer discussed the problems with a proposed vacation
process on the corner of Walnut Place and 99W. He stated that
since the signatures required un the petition would include some
companies back east that it would make the vacation more feasible
if Council initiated the process.
b. President Brian rioted he has had recent business dealings with Mr.
Hudson and though he does not feel there is a conflict of
interest, he will still abstain from voting.
C. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Scott to initiate
the street vacation process contingent upon Bob Hudson paying all
fees and that all abutting and affecLud property owners be
notified by mail.
Approved by 3--0 majority vote of Council present, President Brian
abstaining.
8. HALL. BLVD./BURNHAM LID DISCUSSION
a. City Engineer distributed map showing area of Hall Blvd. between
Burnham Street and O'Mara. With the Civic Center project, the
Water District offices and the Christian Church all needing to
construct half street improvements within the next couple of
Years, 'iP suggPsted an LID might be the best tool by which to
�iccomplish this task. He stated the Water District may not wish
to bancr•ofL the assessment. The City Engineer also noted that the
intersection of Hall and Burnham could either be signalized or
have the turner redesigned to eliminate some of the sight
obstruction. He also felt with the Water District and City
offices being located in the same area, the increased traffic
would be another reason the LID concept would be beneficial.
b. Don Geary, 17832 Cardinal Place, Lake Oswego, represented the
Church of Christ and stated they would like to participate in the
LID plan process. He explained the church would be building in
the next couple of years and realized the LID process could be
cost effective for them. He did mention that Uie Church would not
be interested in participating in any cost for the bridge
reconstruction on Hall Blvd.
C. Consensus of Council was to direct the City Engineer to check with
other surrounding property owners for an indication of interest on
their part in the LID process and to also check w;th tax lot 600
across Hall Blvd. from the Christian Church. City Engineer will
report back to Council in the near future.
RECESS: 8:59 P.M.
RECONVENE: 9:14 P.M.
l
Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1985
9. COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BOND DISCUSSION
a. City Engineer reported on the Washington County Major StrneLs
Transportation Improvement Program. The task force has prepared a
list of streets that would benefit from the passage of a bond
sale. The areas within the City Limits are:
Scholls Ferry Road/Fanno Creek to Murray Blvd.
Greenburg Road and 99W Intersection
Hall Blvd, Bike Trail/ Durham Road to 99W
Bull Mt. Road and 99W Intersection
Durham Road/ 99W to Carmen Interchange
b. Eunice Day, 15940 SW Oak Meadow, represented Summerfield and rioted
that they are very concerned about the proposed development plans
for Durham Road and noted they are serious about protecting their
homes.
C. After lengthy discussion, consensus of Council was to have the
City Engineer request information for proposed development plans
on Durham Road and report back at a future meeting.
10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
10.1 Approve Council Minutes: January 7, 1985
10.2 Approve OLCC Application: Tigard Thriftway, 14365 SW Pacific
Highway, Tigard, Oregon - PS Application - Change of Ownership
10.3 Approve Extension Request for Completion of Sidewalks & Pathways
In Bellwood II1. Subdivision With Conditions
10.4 Approve & Authorize Signatures:
o MLP 5-84 Street Dedication - SW Cascade Avenue - Roger Belanich
a Street Dedication compliance Agrmt/Per•for•mance Bond - SW 114th Ct.
(the Fountains)
10.5 Approve Resolution No. 85-03 Accepting Copper Creek Phase IV
Improvements And Accepting 1 Year Maintenance Bond
10.6 Authorize Letter To PUC Commissioner Requesting Extension of Order
#83-860 to 4/1/86 for Railroad Crossing (72nd Avenue/Mercer Ind. )
10.7 Receive and File
o Update On CPA 23 -84 Subsidized Housing Issue
o Retirement Study Report
10.8 Approve Submission of CDBG Application
10.9 Approve & Authorize Signatures: Crow Lease Agreement/Old City Hall
a. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Scott to delete
items 10.3 and 10.9 and continue to a date uncertain, and approve
the remainder of the Consent Agenda.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
/ 11. NON•-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff
t
Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1985
11. 1 LABOR RELATIONS CONTRACT APPROVAL
a. Councilor Scott requested air fare be deleted from the
contract and she wished lodging and meal charges to be
identified.
b. Councilor Edin and Edwards expressed confidence in Mr.
ScoLt and noted concern in modifying the proposed contract
to any great extent.
C. After further discussion, Councilor Edwards moved to
approve the contract with Donald W. Scott and authorize
signatures with the following amendments: Air fare be
deleted, a cap of $5,000 be inserted, and meals and lodging
be limited with the wordage "reasonable local commercial
rates" added. Motion seconded by Councilor Scott.
d. Mr. Bressley, a Summerfield resident, encouraged Council to
not quibble over nickles and dimes on the contract.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
11 .2 CIVIC CENTER BUDGET DISCUSSION
a. Councilor Scott expressed concern regarding the use of
revenues on the Civic Center Building Project which were
formerly set aside for furnishings . She requested Council
reconsider their vote of 12/17/84. She was concerned that
monies should not be borrowed from another fund to cover
the $105,000 anticipated revenue from the sale of the old
City Hall site on Main Street:.
b. Councilor Edin noted history of issue and stated he would
consider borrowing $80,000 from another fund with the
condition LhaL Lhe $80,000 plus interest be paid back upon
the sale of the property . He also stated that to cut back
the project now by $105,000 would be more costly in change
orders than the risk of borrowing the money from another
fund.
C. Councilor Edwards stated Fie understands interfund loans and
realizes that is would be more cost efficient at this point
than to change the plans. He also requested the Civic
Center advise Council of their concerns.
d. President Brian stated he has talked with Jim Blaurock,
Chairman of the Park Board, and that the Park Board members
approve the monies being used for the Civic Center as long
as it is the last funds to be spent of available revenues
and they understand the funds will be used on the Fanno
Creek side of the project. He also mentioned concern
regarding the inadequate marketing effort to date on the
old City Hall site. He suggested a marketing group may
have to sell the property.
f
Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1985
e. Valerie Johnson, Chairman of the Civic Center Advisory
Committee, synopsized the history of the issue and
expressed the desire of the committee was to carry--out
Council's directive in cutting other areas if revenue
sources are reduced.
f. Lengthy discussion followed. Motion by Councilor Edin,
seconded by Councilor Edwards to reduce the $2.5 million
budget by $25,000 which is to come out of the line item for
the old City Hall sale, and condition the final approval of
bids with Council's right to a full range of options to
choose which revenues will not be spent in light of a low
bid.
Motion approved by a 3-1 majority vote of Council present.
Councilor Scott voting nay.
g. Consensus of Council was to see an active renewed effort to
sell the old City Hall site and requested staff bring back
a marketing plan for Council review.
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1)(d) to discuss labor
relations issues.
a. President Brian noted that Council would not go into Executive
( Session and cancelled that portion of the meeting.
` 13. ADJOURNMENT: 10:56 P.M.
Deputy City Recorder - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
or - City of Tigard
LW/2374A
C
Page 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1985
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal
P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice
BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075
C Legal Notice Advertising PECEIVED
e City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice
P. O. Box 23397
Tigard, OR 97223 ❑ Duplicate Affidavit,
7 sir I IVARD
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON, )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss.
1 Susan Pinkley
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of the T i g a r d T i m e s
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at _ ___ T; Bard —__in the
aforesaid count a dlst te; th t the
Cid_ Councriegu� ar Meeting
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for----!----successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
.Ian. 10 ,1985 _
{ l $ubacribed and swo n t efore me t s_ Jan. 10 , 985
N ary Public for Oregon
My Commissiom Expires: o/88
AFFIDAVIT
iloa.Ftrlheoa� °pail*W yoar inrarms.
� rmm the city.
12M
$394171.
ZMnAR
T
_
AGENDA ITEM # _ - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE — / Ll - g�
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council
wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but time may
require that we schedule your items for a future agenda. Please contact the
City Administrator as to agenda scheduling. Thank you.
NAME, ADDRESS b AFFILIATION ITEM DESCRIPTION
4k C
C
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: JANUARY 14, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: JANUARY 9, 1985
PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: LAND VACATION
PROCESS ORDINANCE PREPARED BY: L. Wilson
REQUESTED BY: staff
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: J. Widner CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
:asa axaaaaaaaxx
INFORMATION SUMMARY
In reviewing the process and the number of City staff and other agencies that
are at our
revised of The processes hason, it was become outdated andhcumbe somedtoance worknwithdo be
forthe
rev
public and staff.
The City Attorney's office was asked to review the proposed ordinance prepared
Th
Thstaff. In the meantime the staff responsibilities were changed and new
theseby se to
ity
legislation sthe oprop sed change andr i t is attachedfor hyour s C
review and
Attorney redrafted
approval.
------ --------
xaaxxaxxss:aax a=
------ -----
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Do nothing.
2. Approve attached ordinance.
:a:aaaaa:ass szxaa zsaacaxaxsasa axaxa saaaaaasaa as sa sa aaassazaaas:asazzza:xasaa a
SUGGESTED ACTION
It is recommended that Council approve this ordinance.
(0750F)
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: January14, _1985 AGENDA IIEM
DATE SUBMITTED* December 10, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Ordinance
amending City's Sanitary( Sewerage ._.__ PREPARED BY:
Rules and RequLations REQUESTED BY: Frank Currie, City Eng. .....
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
This amendment to the recently adopted City--USA Sanitary Sewerage Rules and
Regulations is to more clearly distinquish specific charges and foes which are
applicable to the City from those which are applicable to Unified Sewerage
Agency. Rapid action is necessary in adopting this ordinance, to preserve,
uninterrupted, the accurate issuance of permits.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adoption of the ordinance amending the City's sanitary sewerage rules and
regulations and declaring an emergency .
0847P
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: January 14, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: January 9, 1985 _ PREVIOUS ACI-ION: __ None
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Request for
Council to Initiate a Street _ PREPARED BY: _Cit-y Engineer
Vacation REQUESTED BY: _Bob Huds(-)n _
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: _.—
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Bob Hudson has requested the Council initiate a street vacation for that
portion of S.W. Walnut at 99W that is adjacent to his property . The area is
directly behind the bus stop structure.
The vacation process can be initiated by either a property owner consent
petition (ORS 271 .080) or by the Council (ORS 271. 130). Either method
requires advertisement and notification
Mr. Hudson feels the owner consent process in this case is unduly cumbersome,
in that it requires signatures from both sides of 99W For 400 feet and 200
feet each way from S.W. Walnut, (19 owners in all) .
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve request and initiate by motion. {
2. Deny request and wait for consent petition.
t
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends Coun 1 initiation by motion.
l
(FAC:br/0196S)
27 .1}boeE�asoi'.bearin .tMW
27L�A0.�►c'aoation, ;1a; iaoorporated recorder,or.iothe� o�ii�o,4F • 0
doer yetitlon; oonient,, of in Dteenrestein elan give o
ownem(1)Whenever any Pero ptr Ushing.a• G.,
am
(' any rs desires,aFtyj
stn i�Or Part O ancitin thea O w°0 �Jt�.• -
alite de*iree tt1�v�!ta�•or Part of any street,
aysnu @6 boulevr�rd.,al)sy,�tlit;p� ire or notice of the aa� r'
other p��-Place.a�t parson nayfile a peb in.three of lbe.mw!
tion therefor+ami, ascription of the The notices shall lbs
ground=o be vested.the purpose for the pe6tioa. q� a,
� D=aPo"d:to be the,
and the of at. ons an4■t±!!
rsuon for furl vacation..,;:,_,, when, p*tition,,ap!� OF
(2)T6ae.shdl be appended to such petition. atraaca,which mN4 is,
as a part thereof-and w a basis for posting the with the noordiieg os c`8,q
cams,tL an o of. :i or the.owaerss of all abutting time of hearing,well�e a�,•ti — d
prWeetJt
and
onot Jess'than,two-thirds in area (2) Within$vs days aitw.t¢*firgt play of
of the real property affected thereby.-Tho real ;soogomi offi-
publication,of the not�oe the
propeety affected tbersby shall be deemed to be ear dull Fuu!�to be poritit:oi 9iac8 grid of
the land lying.on,either.aids of the street or the proposed vacideaaa��bolyi9.of.tiw noici jvh3oh
portion thereof proposed to be vacated and shall be headed, 'Notici of Sliest Vacation.`
mtendlagletwagy tothe nest strest that.sarves 'Notionof Plat Vacation'or'Notice of Plat mad
asa paralW s' -,but.in'any case not to nosed Street Vacation.'as the ems.zoo be;thonotice
200 fast,end the land Lora lib lateral distance shall be ported m ut islet two boos�iltrotu plicae
on either.aids of the street for 400 fact along its in the proposed varition&m.•Tbs."ating and
course beyond►esck:Serminue of the part pro- first die'ofpubHadl=W4acb+notioa shall-be
posed to be vacste&Wbere a vteeet is proposed not leer them 2B before Rhe hemring.-: 'A•r
to be vacated to Astermini.lbelandembracedin (3)'Tha ci41 �� ' , �t�hi>X}U' nes
en extension.of.thm street for a distance of 400 publishing iueh ustioN obtain 6om tl�* -
fest beyond each terminus*ban also-be counted. ass a sum tuffidien0ft edgier_thrcoatrd[•aabiici-
In the vacation of any plat at part:thereof She tion, posting and other_enticipated•expenses.
eoneent'b[.the owase oreansrs OfAIN thirds in The city recording officer shall hold the sum so
area o(Rhe Wwwr—.7 wifhisisheh:pot, obtained until the actual cost has been ascer-
1 or pert thwso[prapoln A iw ha voaW aball;be tained,when the amount of the cost shall be paid
sufficient.�vpt;wbste'sueh vaeatweashraces into the city treasury and any surplus refunded
Brest area, when. as to such street sendths to the depositor.
above re4uirsmant!shall also apply.The consent 271.120 Hearing: determination. At
elshe ownses a[Thratigr4rsd
temdOrit�f pebporty the time fund by the governing boll'for bearing
shaDh•in the petition and any objections filed thereto or
an amosr
b••r y xr.,.0 0"1 qcn .if at any postponement or continuance of such
ddssds ' A tioe rL matter,the governing boll'shall hear the peb-
271AM False-of Watk auroo ib%TIM tion and objections and shall determine whether
petition shall bevemn"to tbad4 At the consent of the owners of the requisite area
other esoo gyoffiowpythe loitga ijgmdipt has been obtained,whether notice has been duly
him to.bs adsdsnt,bw&W Shit andtlibrIM4 given and whether the public interest will be
Mastooa of tha-011-tiers w i AbOVatltiD MM prejudiced by the vacation of such plat or street
comabefoee.tb city gowr�bgibodF•d;4 or parts thereof.If such matters ars determined
o oOibaH,rwilre in.mny lwpset in favor of the petition the governing body shall
•�adr orf jbeiadistioo Lor:tir g�eralag,bo&40 by ordinance make such determination a matter
proceedaothepetkisat'nri e!ar
no trto5►1 If. of record and vacate such plat,or arrest;othw-
i' •j, ice' vriJ rn: ! ei s• „ wise it shall deny the petition. The governing
�'J1�1d0 }i !!•J body may. Won hearing, Rant the petition in €
goysenio�.. a part and deny it in part,and make such reserva-
tions,or either, as appear to be for the public
t]�fp s tuc!.aaagcn intw"L
petiti*a ahonld sof, . t#)fonladnbk 995
Part.� hoc a 271.180 Vaeatbn on eoandl'e own
ora motion; appeal (1) The city governing body
may initiate vacation proasdiop authorised by
ORS 271.080 and make such vacation without a
petition or consent of property owners. Notice
shall be given as provided by ORS 271.110,but
such vacation shall not be made before the date
set for hearing,nor if the owners of a majority of
the area affected,computed on the basis provid-
ed in ORS 271.080,object in writing thereto,nor
shall any street area be vacated without the
consent of the owners of the abutting property if
the vacation will substantially affect the market
value of such property,union the city•governing
` body provides for paying damages.Provision for
E paying such damages may be mads by a local
assessment,or in such other manner as the city
charter may provide.
CO25 23
�1.1 f99s1 a 3e CN.
N4201e9 6 14c. t39 M� N390 3 6.73CM v
1n
�r r p
N � V
r g 0S3 3.w120.0
/
Nos o' e.22CM. �-�O o F25
.O 17CN. 1 ' 1.7eCN. 1 q�0 N39033'E 0.73CN 107 2S-0
120.0
00
00
M� �V it ss a �„+ V •••///��•
�S it v 00 g, po
r
w
7CN. ^i :ue.se
` 1.70cN. 1.7 s l
2:s.1
• • / • .
, — _duo 392.0 v Y
O S i 120 2
�,.
00
rl• �• �. I lu O
u �
e
152.0 30 ✓ I �� O
1 O 94
% 222,3p N
it0
v�
e.r: �w
f 40
f^ r° s4a1 �♦
i s ^bIk L OF R ASE.
» , e+,pL w D.V.397/3ec i
C � N 4a•se'WE '���
_ _ I N 4e•30'W"E
L
ow /�
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: January 14 1985 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMI1fED: January 9x._1985 — PREVIOUS AC:IION: _ None
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Hall/Burnham_
L.I D. Discussion _ PREPARED BY: City Engineer
REQUESTED BY: _
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: _ CITY ADMINISTRATOR: _.._.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Civic Center Project and the Water District's intent to improve their
interest at the intersection of Burnham and Hall have given rise to the
possibility of making a complete improvement on Hall Blvd. , from the railroad
to Fanno Creek, and on Burnham from Hall Blvd. to the curve, with the possible
inclusion of a traffic signal at the intersection as an extra capacity
improvement.
An L.I.D. could include 4 property owners - the City, Dick Sturgis, the Tigard
Electric parcel and the Water District.
The Water District has indicated a desire not to be included as they have
already taken steps to accomplish their responsibility at a lessor estimated
cost than would be expected in an L.I.Q.
The inclusion of the Water District doesn't affect the formation of an L.I.D.
in any substantial way, as long as they accomplish the improvements to make a
logically complete project .
I will attempt to contact the other two owners prior to the Council meeting
date of January 14, 1985.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Proceed with Civic Center improvements only, and let the rest fall into
place as it will.
2. Initiate the L.I.D. process on motion and direct staff to prepare an
engineer's report and feasibility study and contact the owners for input.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends formation of an L.I.D. to complete the improvements from
Fanno Creek to the railroad tracks in two phases allowing the Water District +
to contract its own portion and act as its' own general contractor. That
C phase would be financially independent of the other phase, but would guarantee i
completion within a reasonable time limit at Council's discretion.
t
(FAC:br/0196S)
i
ATnida -
�1+6')Fj+1+J+i+t+tyal++9[±Jg11 ii��olajllalllr ailjljt T)i�17 jm 11+ 11 1D� 1T 1.1111-0,11 e a a ° ITt t I III I1 ya Ila ala 1p 111 ap °la ° I ° a 111111111111101111111 a a 1 ►la ---
t t t TT' ! r t t �i — IiIj1>1 � 1 � �► j � s j a t � I , i ,� j , � ,
NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED ° .- __- ,...D. 2 3 4 .-. S B 7 8 9 U 11 12iiiiiiio
DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN -.__.- --
THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL '
DRAWING.
OE 6Z BZ LZ 8Z SZ 4+Z EZ ZZ IZ OZ 6t 81 LI —99— 5f` bl EI Z{ it OI 6 8 L 9 — S Imo" ', a
.nlruuluNlNohualuulaxl�uuluia�lrg�,g, ' t111)uullan
ARV I
_ _� � _ 1990
7 �
J�
w
s � ,
i;
WASHINGIUN CUUNry OkEuot
,B SCALE 1" = 100'
%N,A' Tkg
to 14V
SEE MAP 100
2S 1 2AD /.32Ac.
1 26+69AI P.C.
Bo
I �0
-P lr
zoo.o L T o OGT
300 R b yF
i .6OAc. �2
x
(CS 13,6651 1
1• 8•S3/S33 0�
200.0 ® 1 C •✓"
589^O E 699.7 yaG• I a
yti
400 .p`y I NJse ,o
4.80Ac. I 1 �s w titin.
501 °'oo
3.9 3 A c. cy .O
qC'
/T
32+ I - F /C
n
32 C
1
CTg
` N
® K J
9
t- f0
3�0 0 600
w i B03Ae s
. 578°35 J S 9°
�o J2•
,6 1785 ; N
r I Jff
sTye42
f N N >
O
�5T8°17'B J Cy
700 1
50SAcW*V
.
� y
J 500
5.07 Ac.
2I
SB1
I16.Sa JJo
J°
e�0 702 'B f °'o P
o L6OAc. s
a s°
°s°c
a
S
e�
ao
c� ol
fANNp
701 V/
3.68Ac. 5
TVE
P
J FS
r n
s a
_ N �
O
1
dM
TEPN.C.A. 6T B CH.
S.W. OMRA C.R.567 STREET 6;8.0
MB9°W
SEE MAP
NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED III17►�INlIIIIo11111���I�J112111(III�III Ili3tll Ijllrjr�Tj4l'Ir(Ijl Ilt(t,115tf��R IIt�1 19 718 1 I 1 1119 11 111 111 1 IOL
DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN
THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL ..
DRAWING. —- -- -
OE sZ f?Z LZ-9Z t:Z bZ £Z ZZ IZ--OZ 61 f?I— LI 91 Sf til EI ZI II-- OI 6 e —g_.. 5 y E Z IaBar
tglri1RI1111�IBIIIIII�IIIIIIH�'IUI�U_IpllitlpN
�
� 1 ' 1990 y
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: January 14 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: _
DATE SUBMII-IED: January 9 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: None �..._
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: County Trans-
ortation Bond Discussion PREPARED BY: Cit E ineer
REQUESTED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: _
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached you have a summary of the MSTIP proposal which has been worked out by
the Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee at the direction
of the various City/County Chief Administrative Officers (Stockpot Committee) .
The original assignment was to prepare a list of 30 million, 45 million, and
60 million worth of projects to improve the arterial transportation system
within Washington County, paying special attention to links with local.
municipal systems without particular regard to any assigned benefit.
The WCTCC prepared a technical list of projects which were pared down to about
52 million.
With some minor controversy over cost/benefit ratios, the plan has
been
presented to the "Stockpot Committee". The committee has generally approved
an adjusted plan, and asked the WCTCC to look into the advantages and
disadvantages of the levy vs. bund question, and return to the Stockpot
Committee.
Current discussion centered around presenting the issue to the voters in March
or September of 1985.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
No action required.
(FAC:br/0196$)
IIA. OVERALL MSTIP SUMMARY
This project list provides a brief description of the projects included
in the MSTIP. The project numbers correspond to the project's location
on Figure 1 . A more detailed project description is provided in the
appropriate area discussions which follow this section.
TOTAL MSTIP
PROJECT #/ COST AMOUNT
LOCATION
1 . City of Forest Grove Reserve/ ✓$1 ,500,000 $1 ,500,000`
Location unspecified
2a. 4th Avenue-Cornelius/ ✓ $ 82,000 $ 41 ,000
Baseline to Adair
2b. 12th Avenue- Cornelius/
,/$ 17,100 $ 8,000
Baseline to Adair
'� V$ 87,400 $ 16,000
xJ 2c. N. 14th Avenue-Cornelius/
Adair, north to BNRR tracks
2d. N. 19th Avenue-Cornelius/ /$ 340,000 $ 340,000
Baseline to 250' north of BNRR
3. Overlay Program/ -, $3,000,000 $3,000,000
Rural Washington County
4. Highway Bridge Replacement/ 1-1 2,500,000 $ 500,000
Various Locations
5a. Hillsboro Transit Center/ $1 ,200,000 $ 240,000
Washington and Adams
5b. Tanasbourne Transit Center/
1 ,000,000 $ 200,000
Tanasbourne Mall
1
5c. Sunset Transit Center/ -`$5,600,000 $1 ,120,000
Sunset Highway/Hwy 217
Z;4 vo,000
5d. Beaverton Transit Center/ x$3,500,000 $ 700,000
117th Ave. south of Center Street
2.
IIA. Overall MSTIP Summary continued
f
PROJECT TOTAL MSTIP
LOCATION COST AMOUNT
5e. Westside T.S.M. Improvements/ 1 ,000,000 $ 220,000
Various Locations
6. East Main Street-Hillsboro/ ✓$3,500,000 $3,500,000
9th Ave. to Brookwood
7. 28th Avenue-Hillsboro/ "s 800,000 $ 800,000
Cornell Rd. to East Main
8. Tualatin Valley Hwy.-Hillsboro/ `x$1 ,800,000 $ 270,000
21st Avenue to Oak
9. Cornell Road-Washington County/ °' 2,020,000 $2,020,000
185th Ave. to Cornelius Pass Road
X. 185th Ave.-Washington County/ 'x$16,150,000 $5,800,000 �
jA Rock Creek Blvd. to T.V. Hwy
11 . Cornell Rd. - Washington County/ '"$ 1 ,900,000 $1 ,900,000
158th Ave. to 185th Ave.
12. Cornell Rd.-Washington County/ �$ 2,800,000 $2,800,000 —
Saltzman Rd. to 158th Ave.
13. Murray Blvd.-Washington County/ ✓$ 500,000 $ 500,000 "
Cornell Rd. to Sunset Hwy
14. Murray Blvd.-Washington County/ ✓ $ 6,100,000 $ 900,000
Sunset Hwy to Jenkins Road
15. Cedar Hills and Walker 120,000 $ 120,000
Intersection-Beaverton
16. Beaverton Uptown Improvements/ /$ 300,000 $ 300,000
Various Locations
1�, 130,000
3.
IIA. Overall MSTIP Summary continued
PROJECT TOTAL MSTIP
LOCATION COST AMOUNT
17. :-ombard Extension-Beaverton/ $ 960,000 $ 960,000
Lombard, north to Canyon Rd.
18. Hall Blvd.-Beaverton/ ✓$ 2,400,000 $1 ,020,000
Allen Blvd.to Greenway
19. Hart Rd. and Bany Rd./ ✓$ 1 ,800,000 $1 ,800,000
Murray Blvd. to 185th Ave.
20. Scholls Ferry Road/ '�$ 3,650,000 $1 ,650,000
Fanno Creek to Murray Blvd.
21 . Greenburg Rd.-Tigard/ `�$ 250,000 $ 250,000 --
99W at Greenburg
22. Hall Blvd.Bike Trail-Tigard/ $ 500,000 $ 500,000
( Durham Rd. to 99W
23. Bull Mt. Rd. and 99W Intersection/ 500,000 $ 380,000 '
King City, Tigard, ODOT
24. Durham Rd.-Durham, Tigard,Wash.Co./ '�$ 4,050,000 $4,050,000
99W to Carmen Interchange
25. Lower Boones Ferry Road/ 1 ,265,000 $1 ,265,000 "
Tualatin River to I-5
26. Tualatin-Sherwood Rd./ 5,545,000 $5,545,000
Edy to Boones Ferry Rd.
27. Edy Rd./ �$ 1 ,900,000 $1 ,900,000 --
Tualatin-Sherwood Rd. to 99W
28. Oregon St.-Sherwood/ $ 555,000 $ 555,000
Pine to Murdock
1q,g 75-,000
c:
4.
Overall MSTIP Summary continued
TOTAL MSTIP
P ROJ EC7
COST AMOUNT
LOCATION
$ 300,000 $ 300,000
29, Western Bypass Study
$ 5,000,000 $5,000,000
10% of Program
30. MSTIP Reser /Total
TOTAL TOTAL
PROJECT MSTIP
COSTS AMOUNT
$84,491 ,500 $51 ,950,000
y7�,
cl,rr�ssi r%nCj
3 Z , a r w....�5 �- et
�-�
s 7
(Includes 3 additional ��l1,
projects requested by.T-
Ci.ty of Beayerton)5 B'-WyarW a,i�ha�rCw o�fC��,/caGlae�derless
TABLE 2 Siy���jta�f �Qurw��sni cif
Project Benefit Comparisonl
Estimated Direct 2 Assessed 3
Area Project Benefit Value M
Urban Area (cities)
Beaverton $7,875,000 (15.40) $1 ,298,054,400 (15.87)
Cornelius 405,000 ( .79) 112,099,200 ( 1 .37)
Durham 632,500 ( 1 .24 ) 28,992,500 ( .35)
Forest Grove 11500,000 ( 2.93) 255,328,700 ( 3.12)
Hillsboro 4,810,000 ( 9.40) 803,031 ,000 ( 9.82)
King City 190,000 ( .37) 77,894,400 ( .95)
Tigard 3,790,000 ( 7.41 ) 776,043,500 ( 9.491
Tualatin 3,114,160 ( 6.09) 383,700,800 ( 4.69)
f Sherwood 3,036,660 ( 5.94 ) 67,191,300 ( .82)
Portland/Lake Oswego/ 4
Rivergrove/Wilsonville --- 74,007,300 ( .90)
Subtotal $25,353,320 (49.57 ) $3,876,343,100 (47.38)
Urban Area (Unincorporated) $22,796,680 (44.57 ) $3,634,335,900 (44.43)
Rural Area (Incorporated
and Unincorporated) 3 3,000,000 ( 5.86 ) $ 670,054,800 ( 8.19)
Total $51 ,150,000 (100.00) $8,180,733,800 (100.00)
1 Total MSTIP value - $57,170,000'
2 Percent of total value of specific projects - $61 ,150,000 (does not include T,S.M.
improvements, bridge funds, reserve or Western Bypass Study)
3 Percent of total county assessed (taxable) value - $8,180,733,000
4 Only a small portion of the assessed value of these Oti:es i:s si.tuated
in Washington County.
5 - Davis. Road and Bridge ($1 ,200,000)
- Farmington Road ($3,800,000 - half paid by state = $1 ,900,000)
- Murray/BNRR overcrossi,ng replacement ($2,100,000)
- Value of these three projects split equally between Beaverton
and un incorporated urban area
�e �Slze �� �eee
M eet Ln ease : o ► -1 y -g 5 -.
7i! la rIl ! 1 I 1 i ! I ! 1 x 1 1 1 t't 111111 i 1 T I Y T f i ! t i
$III a L, i p � 1 � � 1 i I P'T'T j nTmg r-Pi (RT�Ir�ra{L'i_']'nirngr�Tj rT tillt�!![�IC0�1t1D111�111glhTlillirlf ltllllrilllilll'19lglII�+I1�1il�rilgl�llF1!. ,�
r'I
NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED
DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN
THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO ..
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL
DRAWING. _
1- ZI II 0I 6 !?. -9--s b -E _Z Iaua. F
�nitnulmlluldlulL!ldtlu�lluEnufrlttht _
oe sz ez Lz sz sz oz ez zz iz oz sr iii ci s! sr �.! e — ultwliwbut
w Jim
-.
MARC 7 '
-- - , F
?
WASHING I uN
"NUNTY
UNIFIED CAPITAL
w IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
MAJOR STREETS
k TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
5 FIGURE 1
7 r 12;1 PROJECT INDEX
0 Da
Ia-
Gr
F
5
10
.5
endo
4 j. 19
c_
3 RUXAL OVERLAY OGRAM 20
4 HIGHWAY SPA GE RE EM
I Ra (PRO CTS TO BE DETERMI ED)' igar
29
.2
26 Tw1aU 'y
Lil -
Ex 27'1" l
TRANSIT CENTER
PROJECT LOCATION 1 dSOURCE: WASHINGTON COUNTY
I'sU f DEPARTMENT OF 1
LAND USE AND
TRANSPORTATION. 984
........ STUDY AREA
Ita,
COUNTY LINEk
cc�o
8�LEI_ 100 mo.E OU-0 PL
POS
CITY LIMITS TO TOK&*tw-—E—=M TM..[+[a[TM COU.1,
o"ART-c"ol-.0 m0 1 �ATiok
NORTH
WASHINL70N COUNTY
DEPAILTMINI Of LAND USE AND TRANSPORIATIO.-,
URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY
PLAIININ(; 1)1%,1510.N:
0 SEPTEMBER,1984
illJI-p ITTIMF"Irp I Illp I I PTrjqIjIj IfIltitl ilyliq rfil flip lytiplip,ip,qipli
all lea ili iii
NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED . 2 3 4 5 6 7
DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN 9 Ao 11 12
THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL t NNW
DRAWING.
6
c 6z ez zz azSz va I' ti if of a
OEM
..................ullmhl
M A R 1990
CITY OF TIGARO OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: / AGENDA ITEM
`f, 9�'�� M
DATE SUBMITTED: December 12, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: COUNCIL DISCUSSION
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: LID POLICY
PREPARED BY: J. WIDNER
ORDINANCE DISCUSSION REQUESTED BY: CITY COUNCIL
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
with Council of the LID Policies, it was apparent that
During the discussions
the Finance and Closure Policy section needed to be revised and updated, prior
to preparation of the LID ordinance.
In response to this concern, I have
revised for your the
rPolicy
o i y section of the Finance
and Closure chapter of the LID policy,
Attached is this revision.
r
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
n/a
SUGGESTED ACTION
If after discussion, Council feels that these policies are acceptable, then a
motion directing inclusion in the LID ordinance should be made.
C
6.2 FINANCE AND CLOSURE POLICY
6.2. 1 THE LID IS NOT "COMPLETED" UNTIL ALL ASSESSMENTS ARE PAID AND THE
BONDS HAVE MATURED.
6.2.2 FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES AT TIME OF INITIATION, INTEREST RATES AT
CURRENT ORS LIMITS PLUS 2% WILL BE QUOTED TO PROPERTY OWNERS.
6.2.3 THE INTEREST RATE CHARGED WILL BE THE NET EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE
OF THE BONO SAL�1UFQR ,.gmINISTRATIVE EXPENSES, i.e. ,
RECORDING THE LIE S C.
6.2.4 INTEREST ON THE ASSESSMENT SHALL BEGIN TO ACCRUE TEN" DAYS HFTER
p THE PASSING OF THE ORDINANCE SPREADING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR ALL
�t PROPERTY OWNERS, WHETHER REQUESTING INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS OR
PAYING IN CASH.
6.2.5 IF THE CITY DOES NOT ECEIV AN APPLICATION TO PAY IN
INSTALLMENTS WITHIN TEN-�TS-j)l "O�TI�CATION OF ASSESSMENT, IT
r� J` WILL BE ASSUMED THE PROARTY OWNER WILL BE PAYING IN CASH.
6.2.6 IF A PROPERTY OWNER MISSES THE DEADLINE_ FOR MAKING APPLICATION TO
PAY IN INSTALLMENTS, AND THE BANCROFT BONDS HAVE BEEN SOLD, THEN
THE APPLICANT MUST PLEAD HIS CASE TO COUNCIL. IF COUNCIL
APPROVES, PAYMENTS ARE SET AT ACTUAL COSTS, WITH A PAYMENT
SCHEDULE DESIGNED TO REPAY THE CITY AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE.
f 6.2.7 IN ADDITION TO THE APPLICATION TO PAY IN INSTALLMENTS, A PROPERTY
OWNER SHALL SIGN A SEPARATE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTRACT
OUTLINING THE PAYMENT POLICIES OF THE CITY, INCLUDING PENALTIES
'4 FOR NON-PAYMENT.
6.2.8 IF AN PPcL�ICAIT� TO PAY IN INSTALLMENTS HAS
h (�t rr� IWOU, AYMENTS Hi 9RY ON OTHER _ SEWE AI . S OR PROPERTY
TAXES ON THE ASSESSED ,PROPERTY
9JAIANeEB. /7, fie c< ,�
6.2.9 IF THE IMPROVEMENT IS IN THE FIRST PRIORITY (A DEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL AREA), THE PROPERTY OWNER CAN FINANCE 100% ALLOWABLE
BY ORS. IF THE IMPROVEMENT IS IN THE SECOND PRIORITY
(UNDEVELOPED COMMERCIAL AND/OR INDUSTRIAL), THE PROPERTY OWNER
CAN FINANCE 75% ALLOWABLE BY ORS. IF THE IMPROVEMENT IS IN THE
THE THIRD PRIORITY (UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL), THE PROPERTY OWNER
CAN FINANCE 50% ALLOWABLE BY ORS.
6.2.10 IF THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT (PRE-ASSESSMENT) HAS BEEN MADE ON THE
BASIS OF ESTIMATED COST, AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT THE
ASSESSED COST IS LESS TITAN THE FINAL COST, COUNCIL SHALL MAKE A
DEFICIT ASSESSMENT.
6.2.11 IF THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT (PRE-ASSESSMENT) HAS BEEN MADE ON THE
BASIS OF ESTIMATED COST, AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT THE
ASSESSED COST IS MORE THAN THE FINAL COST, COUNCIL SHALL PROVIDE
FOR A REFUND IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY
ASSESSED.
r. 6.2.12 IF OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY CHANGES, THE ASSUMPTION OF THE REMAINING
BALANCE OF THE INSTALLMENT AGREEMENT SHALL BE BASED ON THE
CRITERIA ADOPTED BY COUNCIL, BUT SHALL IN NO CASE BE ALLOWED FOR
BALANCES OF $3,000.00 OR LESS ON HOMESTEAD PROPERTY.
6.2.13 INTEREST EARNINGS ON BOND PROCEEDS SHALL BE PLACED IN THE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT FUND UNTIL THE BONDS HAVE MATURED, AT WHICH TIME THE
REMAINING AMOUNT SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE GENERAL FUND.
60r� 14 IF A PAYMENT IS 30 DAYS LATE, A PENALTY AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE
AMOUNT DUE SHALL BE CHARGED, THE AMOUNT TO RECOVER COSTS.
6.2.15 SHOULD THE OWNER NEGLECT OR REFUSE TO PAY T_NSTALLMENTS AS THEY
BECOME DUE AND PAYABLE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR, THE ACCOUNT IS
CONSIDERED DELINQUENT AND THE ENTIRE BALANCE BECOMES DUE
IMMEDIATELY. THIS ACTION REQUIRES A RESOLUTION.
6.2.16 THE COUNCIL SHALL DO A FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS BY
RESOLUTION AFTER ALL PENDING PROBLEMS WITH THE IMPROVEMENT ARE
RESOLVED AND THE IS RELEASED.
Gc►�x-itG�GZa�t U s-��-I�
l
C
CITY OF TIGARD OREGON
i COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: DECEMBER 17 1984
AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: December 10 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: Council request at __
E: LFORECLOSURE time of non—assumption ordinance
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLIDPREPARED BY:
COLLECTION/ASSUMPTION — DISCUSSION REQUESTED BY: CITYICAUNCIR
ASSUMPTION PORTION CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Assessments may be paid in two ways: in cash or in installments. In order to
pay in installments, the current property owner at the time of the assessment
may make application. If accepted, the installment payment becomes part of a
Bancroft Bond issue. If the property changes ownership during the life of the
installment agreement, the new property owner must make application to assume
the outstanding assessment balance. In order to protect the City's position,
the following criteria are proposed for assumptions:
ASSUMPTION CRITERIA FOR BANCROFT ASSESSMENTS
1. No assumption on any Bancroft less than $3,000.00.
2. Assumptions will be at current bond selling interest rate allowed by ORS
288.520, which is 13% unless no bidders then 14%. 13% would be the rate used.
3. Assumptions will be payable monthly and will be for a period 1/2 of the
outstanding period of the current installment agreement.
4. An assumption fee of 2% of the outstanding balance will be charged. Fees
for recording the lien and the release of the lien will also be charged.
5. There will be no assumption, if Bancroft is on vacant land that is being
parceled for residential or commercial development.
6. There will be no assumption, if there is a history of slow—payment* on
the buyer of the property
other debt to the City by . *Slow—payment as defined
r 30 days delinquent.
by Dun 6 Bradstreet to mean payment ove —
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve these as assumption guideline policy.
2. Continue with the non—assumption ordinance.
SUGGESTED ACTION
A motion directing the preparation of an
amendment
tothe
on f sumptiCouncon
C ordinance, incorporatingthe above guidelines (`
approves. (i
(0651F)
I
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF; 1-15-85 AGENDA ITEM #: _.. _.._
DATE SUBMITTED: 1-10-85 PREVIOUS ACTION: Prior license under
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: OLCC other owners
License Application PREPARED BY: _ Chief of Police
REQUESTED BY- __Applicant
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: � ��Y CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
LOCATION: TIGARD THRIFIWAY P.S. (Package Sales)
14365 SW Pacific Hwy.
Tigard, OR 97223
NF,W OWNERS: Robert E. and Gloria V. OJA
Address-: WA INC.
12909 N.E. Hwy. 99
Vancouver, WA. 98665
The above named business was licensed as above byolcc under another owner.
The new owner requests the same classification; i.e. , package sales outlet.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Reco nnend approval as suhn-itted and forwarding to OLCC for final action.
Respectfully,
R.B. Adams
Chief of Police
MEMORANDUM
January 2, 1985
TO: Chief Adams, Police Department
FROM: Penny Liebertz, Finance Department
SUBJECT: OLCC Liquor License Application
Please review the attached application and have recommendation to us by
Wednesday, January 9th so we may include it in the packet for the Monday,
January 14th Council Meeting. Thanks.
PS Tigard Thriftway
14365 SW Pacific Highway
Tigard OR 97223
v
CITYOF TIFARD N o. 1547
12755 S.W.ASH
P.O.BOX 23397 Date
TIGARD,OR 97223
Name /f
Address
Lot Block/Map Subdivision/Address
Permit M's Bldg. Plumb Cash Check
� f
Sewer Other Other Rec. By
Acct. No. Description Amount
10-432 Building Permit Fees
10-431-600 Plumbing Permit Fees
10-431-601 Mechanical Permit Fees 1
i i
10-230-501 State Bldg. Tax
10-433 Plans Check Fee
10-435 Other Licenses & Permits
l 30-443 Sewer Connection
30.444 Sewer Inspection
24.448 Street Syst. Dev. Charge
25-449-610 Parks I Syst. Dev. Charge
25.449-620 Parks II Syst- Dev. Charge
31-450 Storm Drainage Syst. Dev. Charge
i
'n-430 Business Tax
-434 Alarm Permit
10-227 Bail
10-455- Fines-Traffic/Misd/Parking
10-230- CPTA Traffic/Misd/Vic. Asst.
10-456 Indigent Defense
30.446-401 Sewer Service/USA
30-446-402 Sewer Service/City
j 31.447 Storm Drainage
40-475 Bancroft Prin. P mt.
40-471 Bancroft Int. P mt.
10-451 Other Charges for Services
TOTAL 10, r "0``
f 1 J
f
DST.DI.
CITY OF TIGARD,.—QREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: January 14, 1985— AGENDA ITEM M:
DATE SUBMITTED: December:_ 29,,_ 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION'. -None
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Street ---
Dedication Acceptance for.MLP 5-84_ PREPARFD BY: Randv Clarno-
RFQULSILD BY: Mr. Mark D. Whitlow
DEPARTMENT WAD OK: Cr FY ADMINISTRATOR:
LNF�ORMA-LpON SUMMARY
Minor Land Partition 5-84 is located near the intersection of SW Cascade Blvd ,
with SW Greenburg Road. SW Cascade Blvd, is classified as a Major Collector
street and requires a minimum of 60 feet of right-of--way (30 feet from
centerline) . Currently MLP 5-84 frontage on Cascade Blvd. is 25 feet from
additional 5 feet. This dedication is a "Condition
centerline and requires an
of Approval" on MLP 5-94.
ALTERNATIVES.-CONSIDERED
Deny or Accept this Street Dedication.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Community Development recommends that Council accept this Street Dedication.
(0874P)
CITYOF TIIFARD
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
January 7, 1985
Mr. Mark D. Whitlow
Attorny At Law
400 Powers Building i
65 SW Yamhill Street
Portland, OR 97204 1
Re: MLP 5-84 Street Dedication
Dear Mr. Whitlow:
This is to confirm our phone conversation of 1/4/85. The above mentioned
street dedication document will be on the January 14, 1985 City Council
agenda. Assuming Council approves the dedication, the dedication will be at
the City Receptionipr's desk by 9:30 A.M. on January 15, 1985 in an envelope }
with your name on it. it
i
My understanding is that you wish to pick this item up and hand-carry it to
Washington County offices for recording. Once this item is recorded, please
return the original to my office. We will then furnish you with a certified
copy of the document.
If you have any further questions regarding this issue, please contact my
office.
Sincerely, k
Loreen R. Wilson
Deputy City Recorder
lw/2314A
12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171
{J aDIVIDUAL-GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
lSTREET DEDICATION
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that
gheraby dad cats to the Publze a paspatual s�cjetht-of way for street, sosd and utility
within the following described seal property
purposes on, over. across, under, along and
in Washington County: Oregon:
Spa attached Exhibit "A"
forev10 have er for the usssoandld the purposasahorsinaboyebed and stated, dedicated tights unto the public
fee *imPl* and the
The gramtor(s) hereby covenants that they are the ow ood sand nl Sal right to Scant
property in fires of all lie and the n will
pay all htaxesvand assessments due and eying en
the rights above-described. Y
the property.
The amount paid for this dedication is
*Condition No. 2 of Tigard 11LF5-84
IM WITNESS VNEREOF, t e Srancos(a) has -(1►avta- hereunt19 set his
da of n Mbrr -
handls�-and-asaL(a�-this _ Y +� (SEAL)
(SEAL)
SEAL)
(SEAL)
BY
STATE Or VJP44AEe ni 1984
ss. December 0
COUNTY Or KIV464 )
Personally appeared the above named
.e�
who ...... ed th a nstrumsnc and each of them acknowledged o ms that. ch • netrwsnt
was executed voluntarily and freely.
No ary bl c for k Y
M Co ission expires$
ACCEPTANCE
Approved as to form this
'7_ day of 19 •
'
By: y Attorney - C ty o T Sac
this y
�� ds of 19
Approved as to legal description
Sy= and
_ C ty nSinger - CY a TT.S
d• of TY orl9 .-oiE00N
Accepted 0y the City Council this �� y IT c .
By
y scorder
- C ty o Sac
N.
A0_
�QIGINAL
Exhibit "A"
t FT,STREET DEDICATION PARCEL November 7,19E4
S
DESCRIPTION I
lamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon and being more
A tract of land located In the northwest 1/4 of Section 35,Township 1 South,Range
Test of the
particularly described as follows:
Oregon; I
Willamette Meridian, 'alashington County, g� "
Beginning at the southwest corner of the Graham D.L.C• No. 52, in Section ,
Township I South,Range 1 West, lntr thence
o West, 1033.72 feet to a po
thence norths along coursest e oliNorth slid39';p'�' 16 chains to s stone marked with
(an actuaa m „ the south line of the Olson tract as described in Book I
South E9 49' 00 East along 605.24 feet (a measured distance of
304, Page 99. Deed Records of said count9:14 feet to s point on the northerly line
606.0E feet
thence South 0 I1 00"Test, deed to Washington County and recorded
of S.V.Cascade Avenue as established by and the True which
in Book 724, Page 12celDthe a onras170.00 foot radius ocur of to thenright ort e
-17
following described pa Mb " West, 24.13 feet, an arc distance oline f 24for
has a chord that bes0 North E3 29' 23 thence along northaid 10.0 3"
icer; thence North 00 l l' 00" East, 5.09 centerline
fee,n a her d ;thence
South E3 0 0 43"
said Cascade Avenue at 30.0 feet from centerline thereof;that
line.on a 165.0 toot radius curve to the lest v+ square icer,
East, 24.16 feet,an arc distance of 24.1E feet;thence South 0 l l' 00" West 5.00 feet
to the True Point of Beginning,the above described tract containing 121 sq
more or less•
t
r
l
PETTUGHN ENGINEERING COMPANY,INC-
&4-100
i
f
:r f
a ,
LOT 2
30,094s"
ti
ti eu�cvavG II o
o �
h
_ ob7,4 L SrL Ow
3 JO, S A9;49'LAO"E /"Jw
EZI�K�CF
� 60' so'
sB9 `9'a I
� °' � euao%✓G S
g ; rvae. ^ LOT 1
olOrt ' /-f 047 5,-
.?B.l7' 2732 r�:a, ti so O pO.O/ 1✓ _ �S�
7s69'NB9't9"Gb W sy 7.g9'
✓/ILUNI�/ N 76•p0 900 200
s.
LOT 3
B,6.f9 S,-
p�
\��titi� MOB/L O/L CO. TRACT
\
O
Mh
W 0
� W
Z D£�c.R�f3E� AREA
S. L/NE. OLSON 7"- Cr
w BY
-n4, P6 99
O� 4.M W -— 5499'49 00"E - - - -
R Ne9.4P'ati'!✓ /39.33. 40
t fir• Ow7:C ocr� L-537' c�'
rvice.,
sTREErOElvc3rav v
N CAP CO. 7.v ar 4V/PS q�
11H� – — —-
QY. 7 , .REC. I✓.f•'!O.
OLD R�A✓ /9S.Gb IAO.
P+/70.00 L NEw R/N S!./. CASCADE 71
.4MC. %
R=/45 00 /
a-e�13•.cs"
CB•NB3'?9'13"W C=tv./6'
CB•J 493'/7 43'E o Y u ►�\{
,��•fOY/�VO 3ti".ell/fl/NUM CAR
S.W. COR 40ew"AY GL.0 A'S? DEC 211984
CITY OF TIGARD
PLANNING DEPT.
MCMONIES & WHITLOW
.41 I'OR:•EYS AT LAW
400 POWERS BUILDING
65 S0L'THV1E5T YAMH11.1.STREET
PORTLAND. ORLGO\ 97204
TELEPHONE 15031221-1188
January 4, 1985
Ms. Loreen Wilson
City Recorder
City of Tigard
12755 S.W. Ash
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Re: MLP 5-84/Street Dedication
Dear Ms. Wilson:
To confirm our various conversations of today' s
date, it is my understanding that the street dedication has
been approved by the City Attorney as to form and will be
( placed upon City Council' s agenda on January 14, 1985 in
view of the fact that the Council will not conduct any
business at its meeting on January 7 .
Thank you again for your time and cooperation in
the matter. Please call if you have any questions.
yovery ?,Iu'y,
ia k D. Whitlow
vp
cc: client
MCMONIES & WHITLOW
P:I"TOR`EY,,AT LAW
400 POWERS BUILDING
65 SOUTHWEST YAMHILL STREET
f'ORTL.A:`D. OREGON 9720-1
TELEPHONE(503)221-1188
January 3 , 1985
Ms. Loreen Wilson
City Recorder
City of Tigard
12755 S.W. Ash
P.O. Box 23397 s
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Re: MLP 5-84/Street Dedication
f
Dear Ms. Wilson: t
Enclosed in the above please find a copy of my
letter of December 21, 1984 to the Engineering Section,
together with a copy of the Street Dedication which was
enclosed therewith.
Request is made that the Street Dedication be
placed upon the City Council' s agenda for consideration and
acceptance on January 7 , 1984 .
Following acceptance by the City Council, would
you please return the Dedication to this office so that we
may submit it to Washington County for recording.
Please call if you have any questions.
Yt-ars very trow
l
/ Mark D. Whit
vp
cc: client
i
a
December 21, 1984
Engineering Section
Tigard City Hall
12755 S.W. Ash
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Re: MLP 5-84/Street Dedication
Dear Person:
Enclosed in the above, in satisfaction: of
Condition. number 2 thereof, please find for your review and
approval on Cit: of Tigard form, a Street Dedication bearing
the notarized signature of Yr. Roger Belanich. If the
Dedication meets with your approval, would you please. sign
it and submit to the City Attorney and City Council for
their approval and signature and,
thatthereafter,
submitit
notify
this
to
office. of the full acceptance
Washington County for recording.
please cell if you have any questions.
yours very truly,
bark D. Whitlow
VP
enclosure
cc: client
Mr. William A. M01161,1an
Mr. Orvar Litsjo (with enclorurt)
t
INDIVIDUAL-GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
STREET DEDICATION
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Spa ua�anic h
�ghereby dedicate to the Public a perpetual right-ofwsy for street, road and utility
purposes oe. over. across, under, along and within the following described real property
in Washington County, Oregon:
See attached Exhibit "A"
To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the Public
forever for the uses and purposes hereinabove stated.
The grantors) hereby covenants that they are the owner(&) in fee simple and the
property is free of all liens and encumbrances. they have good and legal right to grant
the rights above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on
the property.
The amount paid for this dedication is
*Condition No. 2 of Tigard IILPS-84
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, t e grantor(s) has {haw} hereunt19 set his
h ndlo,�-ond-*OaU+�-this day of nnrn,nhe
(SEAL) (SEAL)
(SEAL) -- SEAL)
i
By .,
STATE OF v, r1=,N ) R t Be an i
) as. December / 1984
COUNTY OF ►_ ��i )
Personally appeared the above nomad
l� 1,
who executed this instrument and each of then acknowledged to M that this instywsnt
was executed voluntarily and freely. `y�f
No ary blie for v
M Cow►isSion expirest
ACCEPTANCE
19
Approved •& to tors this day of
gy s
City Attorney - City Of Tigard
19
�pprovsd as to legal description this day of
by:
City Engineer - City of Tigard
19 •
Accepted by the City Council this day of CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF TIGAiD. OZgGON
By:
city Recorder - City of Tigard
(1704A)
t7-g6)
���GINAL
i
Exhibit "A"
DESCRIPTION 5 FT.STREET DEDICATION PARCEL November 7, 1984
A tract of land located in the northwest 1/4 of Section 35,Township 1 South, Range I
West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon and being more
particularly described as follows;
Beginning at the southwest corner of the Graham D.L.C. No. 52, in Section 35,
Township 1 South, Range I West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon;
thence north along the west line of said D.L.C., 16 chains to a stone marked with "X"
(an actual measured course of North 10 39' 30" West, 1055.72 feet to a point), thence
South Be 49' 00" East along the south line of the Olson tract as described in Book
304, Page 99, Deed Record of said county, 605.24 feet (a measured distance of I
606.08 feet); thence South 0 ll' 00" West, 9.14 feet to a point on the northerly line
of S. W. Cascade Avenue as established by deed to Washington County and recorded
in Book 724, Page 125, Deed Records and the True Point of Beginning for the
following described parcel; thence on a 170.00 foot radius curve to the right, which
has a chord that bear North 830 29' 23" West, 24.15 feet, an arc distance of 24.17
feet; thence North 00 11' 00" East, 5.08 feet to the new established north line for
said Cascade Avenue at 30.0 feet from centerline thereof; thence along said 300.0 foot
line,on a 165.0 foot radius curve to the left with a chord that bears South 83 17' 43"
East, 24.16 feet, an arc distance of 24.18 feet; thence: South 00 11' 00" West 5.00 feet
to the True Point of Beginning, the above described tract containing 121 square feet,
r
more or less.
l
E
4
r
e
r
is
i
PETT13OHN ENGINEERING COMPANY.INC.
W100
f -
R
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: \G-If� Q �S AGENDA ITEM N:
DATE SUBMITTED: January 3 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: None
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Street Dedication
Compliance Agreement and Performance PREPARED BY: John Hagman -
Bond for S W 114th �#> (�� .sT REQUESTED BY: TDC Co 6 Engrg Svc.
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK:
��1� _._ CITY ADMTNIS1 RATOR: — —
INFORMATION SUMMARY
C,C,
l S,W. 114th is located in Summerfield Subdivision, north of S.W.
Summerfield Drive, and west of S.W. 109th Avenue. It is to be developed
primarily to serve a new multi--family complex caval ed ,by theThe oCityins" .
The development has received site design review app
2. We have received the attached Street Dedication Compliance Agreement and
Performance Bond, and also all fees have been paid. Construction plans
have been reviewed and are approved subject to Council then p ince of
this agreement and bond. Construction of the roadwaymay
also.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council accept this agreement and bond.
C (0887P)
STREET DEDICATION COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT
n� 1984
THIS AGREEMENT dated this 3=T day of j C? -1 ~ hereinafter
between the CITY OF TIGARD, a municipality of the State of Oregon,
termed the "City", and Tualatin Development Comnan nc.
and here_.rafter termed "Petitioner ,
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Petitioner has applied to the City for approval for dedication of
a street to be known as $.W. 114t1, Court
as described on the attached Exhib, t "A" and by
reference made a part
hereof; and
City of Tigard requires Petitioners for street dedications to
WHEREAS, the
orm sewers, sanitary sewers,
install streets, sidewalks, street lighting, at
underground utilities and other
ofpublic
; and facilities for the development of the
street and requires the payment
WHEREAS, the City has approved and adopted the standard specifications for
Public Works construction by APWA, Oregon Chapter, and the Unified Sewerage
specifications for sanitary sewers prepared by professional engineers for
Public Works construction; and
WHEREAS, the public improvements required to be constructed or placed in
the said street area are incomplete, but Petitioner has public and nonetheless
therequested
parties
the City to permit dedications of the property to the p
herein named desire to protect the public interest generally by legally
enforceable assurance that the public improvements will be installed as
required and completed within the time hereinafter set forth,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premise and the
covenants and agreements to be kept and performed by the Petitioner and its
surety, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Petitioner shall proceed with the intent and purpose to complete all
public improvements as shown on the improvement plan, as approved by the City
of Tigard, prepared by Cop
oer Consultants Inc. (elan dateearOfromBthe date of
Said improvements to be completed no later than one (1) y agrees to comply with standard
this agreement, and Petitioner hereby
specifications as adopted by the City, or as otherwise be or have been
approved by the Department of Public Works, to comply with all terns and
provisions specified hereinregard this improvement by the Council and Planning
Commission of the City of Tigard, Oregon, and to use only such material and to
as may be required to conform thereto. Petitioner shall
follow such designseg via
provide certification
Cit of installs to City ionspectioconfonmofcregistered c
petitioners improvement work
engineer, to th Y prior
for City tentative and final acceptance consideration.
2. To assure compliance with the City's requirements and the provisions
hereof, Petitioner tenders herewith to the City a surety bond in form ap f is
whe
by the City,
with liability in the amount of $ 28,000.00_ a copy
hereto attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
- 1 -
3. In the event that the Petitioner shall fail, neglect or refuse to
proceed with the work in an orderly and progressive manner to assure
completion within the time limited, upon ten (10) days' notice by the City to
the Petitioner and the Petitioner's surety, and such default and failure to
proceed continuing thereafter, the City may at its option proceed to have the
work completed and charge the costs thereof against the Petitioner and the
Petitioner's surety and in the event the same be not paid, to bring an action
on the said bond to recover the amount thereof. In the event that such action
be brought, the Petitioner and the Petitioner's surety shall be required to
promise and agree to pay, in addition to the amounts accruing and allowable,
such sum as the cou_t shall adjudge reasonable as attorney's fees and costs
incurred by the City, both in the Trial Court and Appellate Court, if any, or
the City may at its option bring proceedings to enforce against the Petitioner
and/or Petitioner's surety specific performance of the contract and compliance
with the standards adopted by the City of tigard, and in any event, in a like
manner, the City shall be entitled to recover such sums as the court may
adjudge reasonable for the City's attorney's fees and costs, both in the Trial
Court and Appellate Court, if any.
4. Petitioner, concurrent with the execution hereof, has deposited with
the City an amount estimated to equal rental and maintenance fees with respect
to the street lighting facilities according to Portland General Electric
Schedule 191, Option B together with a further sum equal to the estimated cost
of providing electrical energy to energize the street lighting facilities for
a period of two (2) years from the date of initial energizing of said lights,
in the sum of $279.36
5. The City agrees to make and provide periodic and final inspections
which in the City's interest are desirable to assure compliance herewith, in
consideration whereof the Petitioner has paid prescribed inspection fee of 4%
of the total estimated cost of the constructionx aaf3d fma,being $ 986. 18 ; Also,
the perscribed main line sewer inspection fee, being $100.00.
6. The City agrees to installation of certain street identification and
traffic signs for said street, in consideration of payment in the amount of
$ 76.25
7. At such time as the public improvements have been completed in
accordance with the City's requirements, Petitioner shall submit a
"certificate of installation conformance" to the City to notify the City of
the readiness for acceptance consideration inspection and upon notification by
the Department of Public Works that the requirements of the City have been
met, the Petitioner will submit to the City a good and sufficient maintenance
bond, if not already provided with the performance bond form approved by the
City, in the sum of $ 5_600.00 to provide for correction of any defective work
or maintenance becoming apparent or arising within one (1) year of tentative
acceptance of the public improvements by the City.
8. Within one year of tentative acceptance of the public improvements
the Petitioner agrees to place a one (1) inch asphaltic concrete Class "C"
overlay on all roads.
9. Petitioner agrees to provide for correction of any defective work
C and/or maintenance becoming apparent or arising during the guarantee period as
hereinabove set forth.
- 2 -
10. At such time as all public improvements have been completed in
( ts, Petitioner shall notify the City of
accordance with the City's requiremen
the readiness for final inspection and upon certification by the Department of
Public Works that all requirements of the City have been met, the Council
agrees to accept said improvements, for operation and maintenance
responsibility thereinregard, and release the Petitioner's guarantee bond.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement pursuant to
authority in each of them.
PETITIONER
LTuala velo went C nc.
Pres.
X G�
l
CITY OF TIGAf2D, OREGON
Magwr 0,o v n c /
BY: '
p Recorder
(0070S)
t
- 3 -
STATE OF OREGON � CORPORATE ACKNC',+'.i
ss .
County Of ._._ -- --- --- -----)
19 , before me appeared ---- __- _-- ._ -- -- ----
O�- this -_ day of _ --- --- -----' ---
---- - ----- ---------
both to me personally known ,
and
_ -- ---- is i h c• - _ ---
duly sworn, did say that he , the said _-__-
is the Secfetar'>>
President , and he, the said _ -- - - -- --- -- - ---- --_-
the
of
-- - — i ;t aff i -ed to said instrument is the cor-
name Cor; � . , - ; �:;: .
ki Cu11 ui ion , and that 0said instru,T:cult
gas
porate seal of saSia
said C��rF�uration by author y of its Board of ZC(
irL
sealed in behalf of ,
nMid ------ -- -
and ------- ---- ---- --- --- -- --
acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Corporat i i>Il
.
IN TEST1?•t0'�Y �';HEHEOF , I have hereunto -,et MY
}j-,nd and affixed my official seal the day ani
year last above written.
tary Public for Oregon
Coi- ssi on Expi res___------- --- _
C
STATE OF OREGON ) CORPORATE ACKNO'�'
SS.
County Of _ Washington-_____-)
December___-, 19 84 bc•`��re me appeared -Robert C. Luton
On this 7th day of --- _ --
both to me personally ;:sown, who bi-i nf. d-L' iy
and Roy Brown q
the said is
Robert C. Luton_-- ___-_ - Vice President i
sworn , did say that he , --
Roy Brown - _i.s the �/c/tll`h1tl}fl c
maid y ----- --
Pr(-�- i dent , and he , the -_ _ ----
_- - -
Tualatin Development Companythe witi,in- _ _
of --
named Corporation , and that the seal affixed to said in�t.rum�:nt is
seal of said Corporation , and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in
behalf of said Corporation by authori tv of its r,��o cif nir(-; tors , and
-
the - acknowledged said instrument to be the fres a:^t. and c'�•�d f
y - -
C d Corporation . have
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF , 1
hand and affixed my of f i i al Seal t hF day t,�l
year last above w'ri l.ten .
1:c�tar f)U ] i.- for Dreg 8/25/88
Sty Cowm.iSsion l:xpir s __---------- -
i
EXHIBIT "A"
t
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TUALATIN
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
for
ROAD DESCRIPTION OF SW 114TH
A parcel of land being a portion of Lots 12 and 15 Willow Brook Farm
lying in the SE 1/4 of Section 10, T. 2 S. R. 1 W. W.M. , Washington
County, Oregon described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner
of the Grantor's property, said point being north 715.75 feet and west
1569.85 feet from the southeast corner of said Section 10; said point
being on the northerly right-of-way line of S.W.rightSumme-of-way
linedonrthe�arc,
thence northeasterly along said northerly right-of-way
of a 610.00 foot radius curve to the right having a central an
of 3
40' 11", the chord of which bears N. 62 31' 12" E. 39.06 feet, an arc
length of 39.07 feet; thence northwesterly along the agc of a 15.0 foot
radius curve to the right Saving a central angle of 85 59' 41", the
chord of which bears N. 72 38' 51" W. 20.46 feet, an arc length of
f 22.51 feet; thence northwesterly along the arc 8f a 257.76 foot radius
f curve to the righ having a central angle of 29 39' 01", the chord of
which bears N. 14 49' 30" W. 131.91 feet, an arc length of 133.39 feet;
thence North 82.40 feet; thence along the arc og a 36.0 foot radius
chord of
curve to the left having a central angle of 272 02' Os",
which bears West 50.0 feet, an arc length o.
170.92 feet- thence South
82.40 feet; thence along the arc 8f a 307.76 foot ,radius curve to the
legt having a central angle of 29 34' 01", the chord of which_bears S.
14 47' 01" E. 157.06 feet, an arc length of 158.82 feet thence along
the arc of a 15.0 foot radius curve to the rig8t having a central angle
of 86 34' 59", the chord of which bears S. 13 43' 29" W. 20.57 feet,
an arc length of 22.67 feet to the northerly right-of-way line of S.W.
Summerfield Drive; thence northeasterly along said northerly right-of-
way line on the ar& of a 610.0 foot radius curve to the right having a
central angle of 3 40' 09" the chord of which bears N. 58 51' 03" E.
39.06 feet, an arc length of 39.06 feet containing 0.366 acres more or
less.
/ SCE► M.PERFORMANCE BOND Cl l�17h Coo-rt�
Bond No. 81046807
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we Tualatin
Development Company
as Principal, and Federal Insurance gqmnanv
a corporation duly—authorized to conduct a Te-neral surety business
in the State of Oregon, as Surety, are jointly and severally held
bound unto the City of Tigard, Oregon a municipality of the State e
of Oregon, hereinafter called the Obligee, in the sum of $28,000-00
o� _
lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment —
which we, as Principal, and as Surety, jointly and severally
bind ourselves, our successors and assigns firmly by these present.
THE CONDITIONS OF THIS BOND AND OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that
the Principals are constructing rublic strecr and sewer im rovements
fc_ The Fountains
in Summerfield located in the Ci ;� of Tigard, Oregon, an en 2r ng
into a street compliance agreement with the Obligee herein,
and upon acceptance of said street Compliance agreement, the
Principals shall make all imvrovements required by the City of
Tigard Ordinances and street Compliance agreement documents
as described in said compliance agreement all of which are by
reference, made a part hereof,
NOW, THEREFORE, if the Principal herein shall faithfully
and truly observe and comply with the terms of the agreement and
shall well and truly perform all matters and things undertaken to be
r performed under said agreement and shall promptly make payments to
all persons supplying labor or material for any of the work pro-
vided by said agreement, and shall not permit any lien or claim to
• be filed or prosecutioned against the Obligee, then this obligation
shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect.
In the event of suit or action be filed 'by the Obligee
hereunder to enforce said contract or to recover under the terms
of this bond, in addition to all other rights and remedies here-
under the City, in the event it shall prevail, shall be entitled
to recover such sums as the Court may adjudge reasonable as and
for attorney's fees.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
bond to be-executed this 14th day of December
�
BY: ,
` '� seal By: (seal)
By: (seal) By: (seal)
By: (seal) By: (seal)
(A true copy of the Power of Federal Insurance Company
Attorney must be attached to Surety
the original of this bond. )
orney-A-Fact
POWER OF ATTORNEY
L INSURANCE COMS
Know all Men by these Presents,That the FEDERANancy L Mountain
s Road.
ummer, Raymond B. Whiteen.Now Jersey.n NJames R or Daly,
yP- has constituted and appointed, and does hereby constitute and appoint
( •tley P. Walker and Leslie L. Rudat of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania--------------------------------
each its true and lawful Attorney-in-Fact to execute under such designation in its name and to affix its corporate seal to and deliver for and on its behalf as
surety thereon or otherwise,bonds of any of the following classes,to-wit:
I. Bonds and Undertakings filed in any suit,matter or proceeding in any Court,or filed with any Sheriff or Magistrate,fnr the doing or not doing of anything
specified in such Bond or Undertaking.
ired or permitted under the laws or regulations relating to Customs
2. Surety bonds to the United States of America or any agency thereof,including those requ
or Internal Revenue;License and Permit Bonds or other Indemnity bonds under the
plaws,ordinances or regulations Lease any State,City,Town, pensa-
tBwnrbdonds,Misccellaneous Surety bondslic or and bondseononds to behalf ofrNotarriestion Public.Sheriffs.Deputyanies.Lost lSheriffsnt band simar P public officials.
ott`icalsers'Comps
3. Bonds on behalf of contractors in connection with bids,proposals or contracts.
in Wffreaa Whereof,the sad FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY has.pnteusot a as BY-Laws.caused these presents to he signed by b Ass stem Vca-President end Aewlrrl Secretary and in
Corporate seal to be henlo affixed the 7th day of December t9 83
Corporate
C 5%`
• .-_
DERAL INS ANCE COOJANY
C=Q--MCCbean Asal rbe•Pr••IdMM
iGlard D.O'COMIN' -
Assistant secretary
STATE of NEW JERSEY 1 ss.
County of Somerset I
On the 19 3 .before me personally came Richard D.O'Connor to rte be"
and by y s known b ep Asendin y to the d the FEDERAL IN-
7th dig d December e mbe r 3 and the a"Richard O O'Connor being by m.dirty sworn.did deposit and axed by a h city O the
Secretary
VICE COMPANY.the corporation described in and which
executed ua foregoing Power d Atlahey• Pawn of Attorney a such Corporw ave and was thereto affu•0 W authority a the eY•Lawa
F FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and knows IM corporate seal tiered.Mal IM seal affixed to IM forgo" McCNean and knows him b W lar Assistant Vies-Pr•adem
d said Conga^Y.and teat he signed said Power d Anahey r Assistant Secretary d said Conga^Y by like authority,snot IMI M its aCqualMed with Georg•
or pd Company,and IMI the red s id o said George MAcCk,aan subscribe0 lo crit Power d Attorney a in the gartur a handwriting d sad Cseorge McGleaan and was tlareto subscribed by audtordY d acid
sign
By-Uws and in deponem's pretence
Notarial Seal
DIA Acknowledged and$wan W beton^a
G on the date above v�7ryOf4Notary Public
CERTIFICATION
ALICE LEO?IABD
NOTARY PUBLIC OF HEW JERSEY
STATE OF NEW JERSEY as. My Commission Expires June 28, 1988
County of Somerset
1,the undeni0had•"Sol"Secretary d the FEDERAL INSURANOE COMPANY.do hereby eer"ity nIat Ulla following a•true excerpt from the By-Laws of 01•said CornnpanrY r adopted M ie Dowd of Dr•clors
on March 11,1953 and meat recently amended March 11,190 and that this eyLaw is in full lore and•Mkt.
.'ARTICLE XVIII
Section 2.AN bads.undertakings,contracts and Olfler instruments OIIIer than as above for and on behalf d the Company which N is authorised by law a Ns darter 10 OR execute,
and*hall be execraed on"name and on bel aM d 1ha Company•nhar by the Charman orIM ViceCharman a IM president a a Vic•-President IennfN
war the Secretary or an Assistant
Secretary,under their reePectne dtksipatlom,except that aha'ons,a mate aMicers or anorneys-in-tact designated m any reeduuon d the aoard ol DreCtons a IAS Execu" a CommilNe.
in such restitution or power of attorney.
or in any power of anaraY executed as provided for in Section 3 below.may execute any such bond.undertaking Of other obligation as provided
Section 3 Ate powersof atst,ay for and on behaN d this Company may and shall beeaecrMd in"rem and on behalf Of the Company.eider by rte Cllarnlen or fa V'n*4:hW t a ea Plasrdera
ora Vrc•-President a an Aawstan Vice-President.P mft wim Ifla Secretary or an Assistant
Secretary.under their respect"designations.The signature of such daoarmay be engraved.printed
or lithographed...
I tunhor comity that said FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY a duly wAnMd lo Isere kt hdeMy and surety business in each of the slates d the United States of America.District of Cehrlllbh.Punto RICO,and each d 1M
epured by taw.
provinces d Canada with the exception d Pence Edward Mand,and its also duty licensed to becorm sok,surety on bonds,undertakings.etc.permmed or r
Ataatam Secretary d FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY.do hereby certify that the forego"Power d Attorney to n lull force and~
1,IM urdlrsrgnad
�� •ayd II�iC.— 19
Owen under my hand and 1M east d said company M Wsnsn.N.J..Mks
-,'Pa.tes•al m S" Z.Nt f nit
Aad•taM seaetary
s<`�J
r4• 11s
TED
'alt•
yEK'�ER�y er��rrr
{hyA
Form 21•1003331Ed.741)GENERAL
a
CITY OF TIGARD OREGON
4 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY S-
DATEOF: January 14, 1985 !_ AGENDA ITEM #: / • ..t —
DATE SUBMITTED: January 2, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Accept. of performance
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution Bond and Sub Compliance Agreement
accepting Copper Creek_Phase IV PREPARED BY: R. L. Thompson —
placing same onto its One Year
Maintenace Period. REQUESTED BY: Tualatin Development Co.
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
1. Copper Creek (Phase IV) is a 29 lot subdivision located south of Durham
Road and west of Kneeland Estates Subdivision being adjacent to and just north i
of Copper Creek (Phase III) .
2. All public improvements except sidewalks have been installed. The
developer being Tualatin Development Co. has posted a One Year Performance
r Bond to guarantee installation of all sidewalks.
3. Further said developer has posted a one year Maintenance Bond to assure
maintenance of installed public facilities and to assure correction of any
deficiencies which may arise.
4. The developer's (original.) project performance bond can now be released;
the aforesaid maintenance and sidewalk bond being sufficient to meet all
remaining terms of the City's agreement therewith.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
__._._.__......._._._...._.^.....-_... _._._..._...._..
SUGGESTED ACTION
That the City Council accept the One Year Maintenance Bond and Sidewalk Bond
and accept the public improvements constructed within Copper Creek Phase IV
subject to specified conditions; and, further, authorize release of the
/ original project performance bond.
r
0875P
CITY OE' TIGARU, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM N: /
AGENDA OF:
DATE SUBMITTED:
January 2, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Previous Exten i n
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Extension of PUC
Order 83-860 REQUESTED BY: Mercer Industries
CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK:
isa!!zs s=s s==_=a=a=az iasss s Isis i!s!!ssi s z s==a=s z=s s v i s a s a i i=a s=......
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Mercer Industries, Inc. , has requested that the City request of the P.U.('. ~ha* the
existing P.U.C. Order #83-860 be extended to April 1 , 1986.
This crossing serves the Mercer's prr)perty between the SP and BN tracks south of
Bonita, and is the only practical access to the property. This would be a publi -
crossing because it connects 'wo public rights-of-way.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Refuse to request an extension resulting in an expiration of the P.U.C. order on
April 1, 1985.
Request P.U.C. to extend the order to April 1, 1985, preserving the option to
allow the owner to provide the crossing for another year.
ssissi:i!!s.......
:s=C s s a
............a==a s s s i i a=......
........................
!!!!vasizi!siiiisis!ssl =s s s
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends Council authorize a letter to the P.U.C. Commissioner requesti,u,;
extension of Order #83-860 for one year until April 1, 1986.
. A
I✓r; �CF�VEQ
MERCER INOUSTRIES, INC.
MERCER ✓ j ,�
2636 N.W. 26th AVE., PORTLAND, OREGON 97210C/Ty o' j/ X984
P.O. BOX 10166
AREA COE 503( AN QUAL OPPORTUN T1Y EMPLOYER Gqt(p
November 13, 1984
City of Tigard
P. 0. Box 23397
Tigard, OR 97223
Attn: Frank Currie
Director of Public Works
Subject: S.W. King Street Grade Crossing - Burlington Northern
(Oregon-Washington) Inc. , Oregon Electric Branch Railroad
Public Utility Commission Order No. 83-860
Dated December 21, 1983
Dear Mr. Currie:
In reference to ti-...: Public Utility Commission of Oregon Order No. 83-860
dated December 21, 1983 granting a grade crossing into our property at
S.W. 74th Avenue and King Street, Tigard, Oregon, we hereby request that
this order be extended 12 months from its present date of expiration of
April 1, 1985 to April 1, 1986.
Due to down turn in Oregon economy our plans for building on this site
have been deferred.
We hope this request meets with your approval.
Yours very truly,
ME USTRIES, INC.
D. E. Mercer
DEM:sd
C
REINFORCING STEEL■ ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING PRODUCTS ■ GLASS ■ RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PRODUCTS ■CONCRETE ACCESSORIES
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: _JanuaryL 14, 1985 ._.. AGENDA ITEM #: f 7--.-
DATE SUBMIITED: January 8, 1985 PREVIOUS ACI-ION: Dela ed final action
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Subsidized in November
Housing Report – PREPARED BY: William.-A. .Monahan
REQUESTED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CirY ADMINisrRATOR-.
—
INFORMATION SUMMARY
ne attached memo is a report of the -tops which we have taken to work out an
agreement with LCDC on our one remaiiiing acknowledgment issue - subsidized
housing dispersal policy. No action is needed at this time. We will present
alternatives and suggested actions at a later date. Our goal is to attain
acknowledgment of our plan in March.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
No action needed at this time.
901P
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Members of the City Council January 9, 1985
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Report on Subsidized Housing
Since our acknowledgment hearing before (_.CDC in November, two important
meetings have been held. The first meeting, attended by Mayor John Cook in
Salem, was held on December 7, 1984, with Assistant Director Fldun Hout and
LCDC staff. The discussion during that session centered on LCOC's requirement
that policy 6.1 .2 and 12. 1 .1 of the plan dealing with subsidized housing
dispersal be deleted. We explained our concerns and convinced LCDC that we
need to have the option of inserting an alternative policy if we eliminate
6.1.2 and 12.1.1 . Our discussion resulted in a commitment from LCDC that they
would work with us to draft language we hup to accomplish our purpose of
drafting a policy or Code provision which LCDC can support. The alternative
could be proposed as an amendment. Lu our plan at post acknowledgment.
Although LCDC is not required to approve our modifications at post
acknowledgment, being in a position Lo argue that, the language which we may
propose is language which LCDC supports could be in our favor.
Li:DC staff, Jim Sitzman and Dale Blanton, met with I_iz Newton and I on
December 27, 1984, to discuss their ideas for alternative language. Our
intent was to develop a policy or implementing technique which performs the
same purpose as our original policy, that i.s, preventing an undue
concentration of subsidized housing.
One possibility being discussed is a process which requires a review of any
subdivision which will result in common ownership of over Lhree adjacent units
or more than thirty per cent of the units in the subdivision. The review
would involve an analysis of building type, siding, and maintenance of the
structure and grounds. Thus, the concern which were raised during the
comprehensive plan process about subsidized units such as appearance and
preservation of property values could be dealt with within a review process
which is not restricted only to subsidized units. Such a process could
eliminate the criticism of our plan that we are singling out subsidi.z-d units
only for additional review.
We are awaiting revised suggested language which LCDC is working on. Once
this language is received, the staff and City Attorney' s office will review it
then submit it to you for consideration. At that time we will outline the
appropriate steps needed to complete the process.
i
09O1P
dmj
MILLIMAN T& ROBERTSON. INC. � �
C-ONSI-LTiNC. .%C 'I PARIES
1
101 S.W. MAIN-SUITE 023
PORTLAND.OREGON 97204
wC10CLL-1—mAN r SA 19,GI
.LLAN D--LECs.IS A 303/227-OD»
DAVIOV.ACNE.IsA
uRR,O GAGER.F SA
JA«ES0 GEROUIST.IC.AS
GEowGE L GEww,.r S.
DAVID GKRERST•FF FC.s. December 17 1954
Trr .AS•BLE Aw"Er r S A
wrulA«r
V GD-N.am IS A
Fs
'E--EN
SEANCN D GwINK.r S• -
•.OG[RTCCA. DELI SA
ROGC RT«CHANDLER IS.
LION I CNAUNC..IS
NARK A CNESNER.FSA
OG
R [R,L.COLLETT.s SA.
JONN•COO SON r s A
JIDSCI.••E CROINNE.F s"
JA«[S A.CURTIS.F SA
,NCI..S K.CUSTIS.F S.
GART C DANL«AN t SA.
TI..OTN T J.OAVC.P T.IS. Ms. J. L. Widner
ORCINS.DSNIDO"'.r S"
C—S L.DEN Isom. SA City of Tigard
SCOTT
J.pIsom.I '. f SA
MILDS A.DORIIN.f SA 12755 S. W. Ash
.06C.T T DUK[S.r SA
ROGE S E DERTrSKI.Fs.. P. 0. Box 23397
JDNN S ECKERT 5 A
JDNR S COWARDS.r C•
STEVEN A EISENGERG.I SA
CAR,GEKLOF r S" Tigard, Oregon 97223
.
«MTIN FCLD«AN.r S A
C—EL J.FLAMER"r CAS
JONNC rOLET..ISA Dear Jerri
GRAOLW
E1C FOLEW FSA
CAR,D FR..KLIN,F S A
JAMES A GOGES,r SA
DERMIS J.GwAF.rSA I have enclosed an Executive Summary of our previous three re-
OCNNIK.GAF.IS .FCAS
DENNIS L.GRAVES.F SA
JAR I,G REES°C•s ports and the material discussed at the six meetings with the
«.RETS GRAVES ICA r!•
L
E NAGEC. FSA
CI&E S_NGSIRON.Is A
Retirement Review Committee and City staff. As you are aware
DALE
RDRALDG.-^^-Si
FSA
INE.r CSS. this was very much a joint effort with strong cooperation and
C.EwN N
0. this
input from the Committee and staff. At this point we are pre
-
GwEGDR.NNCwwLC.FS.A
.aiGLASC..OLDENr SA pared to recommend the following changes to the City's retirement
.
+ LVIOINGI/I.F SA
ENIO«R ISAACSON.IS. programs:
NONI.RO M TO.F CA
GREGORI D.JACOGS.F SA
.HARK D.JONRSON.r s A.
G.RYR. SOS-If SA
CAA
[UGCN(.MKAL wARSKI_ Police Officers - Terminate existing plan and
I
�L�I KLINE.ICAS integrate with the Oregon PERS.
GERALOT KDGER.FCA
LESLIE C KOR•ER.C.F SA
DAVIDW,D. LIEGER.rsA
♦LVOT: All Other Employees - Eliminate I.R.A. plan and
. .
JOIN« 0 LEL F S/ILEASER,F SA
LEONARD.J.LEONI'rsA improve defined contribution
FREDEwIC T L—ON.r SA
«ASK C.uTOIN r S.A plan.
D ALAN LITTLE.F S
«ICN.CL J.«A..ONC Y,F SA
GRIAN I NAT+SON.F S A
CAN,ELJ.I CARTN..Fs" The Executive Summary outlines the groundwork we laid in arriving
ICN.EL w« •TN.F s•.
«`N""."`N R""„`As at the above stated recommendations. I will be pleased to brief
DOI.GLAs ITE N.ES.F s.,
STEVEN-.Rr-0 ISA
ED.TARO...ONO—SA the City Council on our analysis and answer any questions.
,NO«AS G F NELSON S A
DANT” ..
R NICC.S r 5A
DAVID I OWEN,F s
GwUCE T OGC.I SA.
ROGER,W Sincerely,
O«DAI_F SA
RICHARD E.OST—r s..
GR,
,CGORT IN....E.,FSA
RAYL J.PATTERSON.F SA.
J-LIMN•EAGODT.r S A
..A WG 7 C.CARSON.F S A
KRIS 4 DETERSON.F SA
RA,YI.OND C IIINC2KONS-1.F S.A.
-D.E•T-•R.DR.FS•. earkO. J son, F.S.A.
DONALDARNOLLFCA lti g ctuary
STANLEY'
ROGCRTS I s w
STUART A..OGER,SON.F SA
WALTER S.RUGLANO.r SA
«ARCIA S.SANDE".r S" MOJ:dm
Jp.N.SCNREINE w.r SA
IAAIA I S.SEDLACCK.F SA
ODNALD J.SEPAL F SA _._. enc 1 .
Y.T..O«AS SI«ESTCR.r SA.
JOSERN 0. INTw.r SA
wILLL«D.S«IIN,r SA
JDNR.SNYDCR.U.FSA ��: City Council
STEVEN D.SCRANER,F SA
KAREN
_STANLE[IS S. Retirement Review Committee
ILEEE L,TEITE.F ISA
LCC N.SYwAArC.c SJL
XRT,J.SULLIV FSA
DOUGLAGa TAYLOR.F SA
OCA LDa T011.1s..
IKARR A TwICR F SA.
STANLEY G.TULTR,r SA
JAF.CS R.TYLER.FS.A
GRYCE N.VANDER ELS F SA.
•NORCw G.w...M F SA.
RO..ALO w.RICDRER.r S..
RICNARD C.WNITc.r SA.
ww-..m—ft.ENwcwOE III.:S U
A ALBANY -ATLANTA-CHICAGO- DALLAS- DENVER - HARTFORD- HOUSTON - INDIANAPOLIS - LOS ANGELES- MIJM?K�7- MINNEAPOLIS
GIRuCE w—Tcn-Or.r S• 77 LL 11
MLK[L.WORK«AN,r C. NEW YORK-OMAHA•PHILADELPHIA-PHOCNIX-PORTLAND-SAN FRANCISCO SEATT LC•WASHINGTON.D C
ASSOCIATED IN CANADA w11«ECIILCA•ARTNERS.LTD.
CITY OF TIGARD
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
Executive Summary
Basic Concepts (Report No. 1)_
Replacement Ratios
Career Defined (Entry Age/Retirement Age)
Adequate Retirement Income
Defined Benefit Plan vs. Defined Contribution Plan
Adequacy of Current City Programs (Report No. 1)
Police Department
-- ORS Chapter 237 -- "Equal to or Better Than"
-- Adequate or more than adequate for all
Other Employees
-- Voluntary aspect of I.R.A.
-- Adequate for lower paid career employees
-- Less adequate or inadequate for higher paid or shorter
career employees
Analysis of Police Department Plan (Report No. 2)
Drawbacks of Contract with Bankers Life
-- Communication
-- Non-competitive annuity conversion factors
-- "Minimum Deposit"
Advantages of Current Pian over PERS
-- Retirement formula -
-- Termination of employment benefits
-- City control of benefit levels
Advantages of PERS over Current Plan i
-- Early retirement eligibility and benefits
-- Cost-of-living after retirement
-- Death and disability benefits
-- Portability with other Oregon cities
-- State taxation
I
Drawback of PERS !
-- Dispatchers excluded unless all employees of City join PERS
Annual Contribution Requirements
— -- _
-- Current Plan: City 23.60% j
-
-Employees------6.00
Total 29.60% of base pay
i
-- PERS: City 16.98%
�. j
Total 4.�$% of all earnings
i
121784
TII E2
MILLIMAN fE ROBERTSOK xc
Analysis of General Service Employee Plan (Reports No. 2 and 3)
Advantages of Defined Contribution Plan
-- City's cost is level
-- Simple to understand and administer
-- Can be rolled-over at termination of employment
Disadvantages of Defined Contribution Plan
-- Employee uncertainty of benefit level at retirement (employee
assumes investment risk)
-- More expensive to fund retirement income because of substantial
termination benefits
Adequacy of Benefits
-- Current 8% is inadequate for most career employees
Disadvantages of PERS
-- High cost to City and employees
-- Past service is unfunded
1
Recommendations '
3,
Police Officers #
-- 73
Integrate with PERS effective July 1, 19
-- Terminate current plan
-- Transfer assets from Bankers Life to PERS
All Other Employees
i
-- Discontinue 8% I.R.A. contribution
-- Establish 12% defined contribution plan
-- Roll-over lump-sum value of past service benefits for
dispatchers from Bankers Life �.
� E
i
j
i
I
121784
TII E3
MILLIMAN & ROBERTSON. Hc
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: January 14 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: no
DATE SUBMIT fED: ._jarjuart_?_,._ 1995.. PREVIOUS ACT ION: ............
ISSUE/AGENDA T'I1LE: Acceptance of
application for CDBG funds .._._. PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton
..........
REQUFSTED BY: Dept. of Community-Dev.
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On November 30, 1984, the Planning and Development staff submitted an
application to the Washington County Office of Community Development for
Community Development Block Grant funds to improve the storm drain system in
the NPO # 2 area between Greeriburg Road, Highway 217, and Pacific Highway .
Ann Culbertson with the office of Community Development has contacted the City
and requested that under the rules of Lho Community Development Plan, Lhe City
Council acknowledge submission of the application. A copy of the Application
is attached for your information.
Please note that the application which has been filed does not require an
allocation of funds by the City.
wqw: =77=
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Approve submission of the attached application to the Office of Community
Development.
0899P
WASHINGTON COUNTY C08G PROJECT PROPOSAL
NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION-
i. TITLE: Storm drainage repair and
FOR STAFF USE ONLY:
installation. Project NO-
2. PROJECT SPONSOR:
Nam& City of Tigard Date Received Time
Add res s
12755 SW Ash Avenue Eligible Yes No
�—
Tigard, Oregon 97223 qualifying COBG Regulation
contact Person
Elizabeth Newton, Associate Planner
Phone 639-424 3. pUALIFYING:
Signature �"— D-13
A. CO Plan Need Citation
Title Roberean
City Administrator B. Criteria low to moderate income criteria.
4. PROJECT BENEFIT:
A. Census Designation 309.00
Attach map which Identifies the
location of project ectivit!as and outlines the neighborhood boundary. Label It Exhibit A.
B. Project loceted within a low and moderele Income neighborhood:
(1) Total number of neighborhood residents
/ 1958
(2) Number of residents to be di mctl y served by project
/ 1958
(3) Percentage of residents to be served who are low and moderate Income 55%
C. Project located within a slums or blight neighborhood:
(1) Total number of structures
(2) Total number and De roan lege of s trvcture s that ere un se h
/ end f
(3) Percentage of unsafe structures addressed by this project
f
D. Cl is the sources) of information for B or C. Washington Co-unty 1980 Census Data
S. OTHER IWOR)IATIONr
A. MITI epproprlale project activities be handicapped
11°
tail
accessible (e.g.. sidewalk Improre�en Yes
B. Is project ompatible with local plans?
Tis X No Explain and reference
Couwrehensive Plan j)olicy 7.2.2
plans for solving drainage problems in existing developed areas in it capital
improvements prostram.
7. PROJECT COST:
6. PROJECT PERIM
.
TotaI CDOG doIisrs requested
Start (mo/yr) Ju1Y 1 1981
Total dollar valve of other resources f
End Coo/yr) July 1, 1986
TOTAL PROJECT ODST = 342,000 ,
OCD For* 2. Rev�1 111
B. PROBLEM STATEMENT:
Due to the inadequate storm drain system, storm water runoff has been flooding foundation
{ homes, basements and the railroad. Numerous storm drainage complaints have been
received from residents in the area. In addition, these are areas of severe erosion.
Areas of flooding and erosion are indicated on the map attached as Exhibit "B".
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A. Describe how the neighborhood project activities address the need or alleviate
the problem identified in the problem statement.
The installation of an adequate storm drainage system will meet the storm runoff
needs of the area. The project will allow storm water runoff to be piped out of
the area into Fanno Creek rather than running over the surface of the land or
through open trenches. The total project cost is $ 342,000. There are 584
equivalent service units included in the project area. Approximately 321 equivalent
service units are under the control or ownership of individuals in low to moderate
income brackets. The Southern Pacific and Burlington Northern railroads will
contribute $42,000 to the project. The remaining $300,000 will be divided by the
584 esu to equal payments of approximately $525.00. The CDBG funds will pay the
assessment for individuals in the low to moderate income bracket.
B. Now wi l l CDBG funds be used? Describe tasks and provide timeframe for
completion of project.
Preliminary Engineering - May - June 1985 - This task will be started as soon as the
CDBG a►oney is awarded and involves preliminary design work to allow for formation
of the LID.
Formation of LID - May - Oct. 1985. This task would be started as soon as the CDBG
money is awarded and involves educating the neighborhood residents of the project
purposes, public hearings, and recording assessments.
Detailed Design - Oct. 1985 - March 1986. This task involves preparation of detailed
construction plans.
Construction April 1986 - July 1986 - This task involves actual project construction.
• R
C. What are the consequences if the project is not funded? The storm drain
system as it presently exists in the area will continue to deteriorate. The
ionly alternative to CDBG funds will be to form a Local Improvement District
(LID) at full cost. It is unlikely that an LID would be formed in an area of
low-moderate income individuals at full cost as the assessments would place
an undue burden on low-moderate income home owners and renters. The LID would
be more likely to be accepted by the area residents if they could receive the
benefit of improved storm drainage at a reduced cost.
10. Explain whether this project is part of a coordinated effort involving other CDBG
projects in the neighborhood.
There are no other projects involving CDBG funds currently being undertaken in
this neighborhood.
r
s
11. Explain whether this project assists or complements other historic preservation
activities going on in the neighborhood.
e
There are no historic preservation activities going on in this neighborhood.
ti
112. PROJECT SPONSOR INFORMATION:
A. Has sponsor previously received CDBG funds for a neighborhood revitalization
project in the same neighborhood? Yes No xx If yes, explain.
B. Previous CDBG-funded projects in 1982, 1983, and/or 1984: None
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
CDBG Project Year of Amount Completed in Completed If no to (4) or
Number Award of Award Time? Within Budget? (5), explain
4027 1983 $ 32,340 in process
(The environmental assessment
is being published and should
be completed in January.)
C. Residential/Employment Displacement: None
i
i
D. Operation and Maintenance: The City of Tigard will assume legal responsibility
for operation and maintenance of the improvements and facilities. The improvements
will be included as a regular segment of the City's regular storm drain maintenance
program which is supported by the City's storm drain utility. Each of the
residence contribute to this utility program.
C
:^` • 1 r
CA
co 0
ve
to
04 ;411
CDO 14
• CIO
C4 cc
54 P4
N h
! - )� .
OD
.�!r _fin � j �? �-t• fK��_
., �. 04
0.4
- i
{ 13. CITIZEN SUPPORT:
A public hearing was held on January 4, 1984, to consider needs for Community
Development Block Grant funding. A copy of the minutes are attached. Also
attached are complaints from area residents regarding storm drain problems.
14. PROJECT MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY:
City Engineer, Frank A Currie will be the project manager. Mr. Currie is currently
Public Works Director for the City and has 20 years of experience in Public Works,
Engineering and Management. Mr. Currie will spend approximately 12 hours a week on
the project for the duration of the project.
a
w
C N _ .11
kn IfN p J O
wl
u
LO N O O N V
d � w
O u
d
N
W
O C CO
Z r
U. �1
C
O a+ 7
�-+
A
N
W _ �
V �
�► C
O IS
A
N
iE
W V d
L
7
O � O
N
J C 4
d C
� O
Ln
�p
� C
A W
L E
d d
d �
U.
O O O O $ C O S �r
O N O O O O
C L
Zkn 0 to O in n vl &M O A O
tO►+ NinN O Ln O 1� toN O O O O c '
OZ e+1 OD L�
vL N 00
m E v
r
L C
O"-
O OO O O O O O O dr
J O O O O O �O O pp O t;
O O S O O O CO 0% O O O O
F- Vl 00 Ln LA O Ln kn in O O C
Cl 1.1 N N y o
A61
u OJ
N N C L
d V1 +� .-•G
V W u C
N N' VI iJ OW L r d
N m O u > 11 44 N
CY OC r d N C u L N V 06 W N > W
CD a, r C r r d A 7 x 01 H
cm A r 7 O A r N C r W d z CJ
W 1x C N r L i� A O 11 (,� 1i u W
f► H O C r 7 C C C
N < r Z 7 A d C O �+ O O r-
i.� al N C u sor r u r A H = Z
F- C 4 r r �O p N �
O1 ♦P C r r• N A A r !-
tp W O A/ u A 7 41 O d d u 10 L J W
O ON r L > A N W N r O L 4/ •K CO
O O L O 11- W A c O C CL O t O
00 v L Y- L d O L Oi:lzoj ;
d ++ O
m d d O O V 1-- J V d V oC O 1- CO
A u 'O 0 M. E C O
1r.
EXHIBIT "Aff
WA SH ING
I.
TON
� gR►
- E ■It■C a�■1�■
:��_�1� ■1111: ���!�1��
'i I MEN mi. _ moo...
� i• ■� ::
nn OR
T LM
LM
i• '�
OEM
poll go
�. i.
MEN
/III.. � ,1 • �
saw
M
3 ME
i i �'�'rOC ��L���:'����♦��y/�� moi=
�.-
■
■
■
1■■
s ■ ■ • ■ __
r
14
■■■� tit ► 1
•••'',,�� 11.111• `•• � `�" •� ■
9 �
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Mayor b City Council January 10, 1985
FROM: Loreen Wilson, City Recorder—��
SUBJECT: Crow Lease Agreement/Old City Hall
Consent Agenda Item 9.9 (Approve and Authorize Signatures: Crow Lease
Agreement/Old City Hall will be hand carried Monday night by the City Attorney.
(pm)
S