City Council Packet - 10/29/1984 t
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate
OCTOBER 29, 1984, 7:30 P.M. sign-up sheet(s) . If no sheet is available,
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start
10865 SW WALNUT of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items
TIGARD, OREGON 97223 are asked to be kept to 2 minutes or less; longer
matters can be set for a future Agenda by con-
tacting either the Mayor or City Administrator.
1. SPECIAL MEETING:
1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call
1 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please)
3. BUT"TERFIELD CAPITAL CORP./WESTLAND INVESTMENT CO. , CPA 20-84/ZC 13-84
FINAL ORDER - ORDINANCE NO. 847_ _
o Planning Staff
4. PACIFIC WESTERN BANK, CPA 21-84/ZC 14-84 FINAL ORDER -
ORDINANCE NO. 84- _
o Planning Staff
5. WESTERN INTERNATIONAL, SDR 1.2-84 FINAL ORDER - RESOLUTION NO. 84-
0 Planning Staff
6. SUBSIDIZED HOUSING FINAL ORDER - ORDINANCE NO. 84-
0 Planning Staff
7. TMC CRIMINAL_ CODE CODIFICATIONS
o City Attorney
8. RETIREMENT" STUDY DISCUSSION
o Finance Director
9. DISPATCH CONTRACT/RFP - CONSULTANT
o Councilor Scolt
10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
10. 1 Approve Council Minutes - October 22, 1984
10.2 Authorize Lease Purchase Contract For Police Copier.
10.3 Receive and File
o Volunteerism Non-Staff Follow--up Report
o APWA Report
10.4 Approve Hardwood Industries Inc. , Oregon Business Dev. Loan
Resolution No. 84-_Z5
4
11. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff
S
12. ADJOURNMENT
2088A/lw
COUNCIL AGENDA - OCTOBER 29, 1984 - PAGE 1
T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 29, 1984, - 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Tom Brian, Kenneth
Scheckla, and Ima Scott; City Staff: Bill Monahan, Director
of Planning & Development (arrived at 7:40 P.M.); Tim
Ramis, Legal Counsel; Jerri Widner, Finance Director (left
at 7:50 P.M. ); and Loreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder.
2, TMC CRIMINAL CODE CODIFICATIONS
a. Legal Counsel noted the Tigard Municipal Code needed to be revised
to come into conformance with revised Oregon law and recent court
rulings on criminal code matters. He recommended adoption of the
following ordinances.
b. ORDINANCE NO. 84-64 AN ORDINANCE MAKING IT UNLAWFUL TO TAMPER
WITH ANIMALS USED FOR LAW ENFORC:EMLNT PURPOSES AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
C. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to amend
ordinanco by adding an emergency clause under Section 2 and
adopting the ordinance.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
t d. ORDINANCE NO. 84-65 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTERS 7.04, 7.08,
7. 12, 7. 16, 7.20, 7.24, 7.28, 7.30.010 1"O 7.32.060, 7.36 AND 7. 44,
AND ADOPIING PROVISIONS RELATING TO PROCEDURES, DISPOSITION OF
OFFENDERS, OFFENSES AGAINST PERSONS, OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY,
OBSTRUCTING LAW ENFORCEMENT, MINORS, OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC
ORDER, CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AND CURFEW HOURS FOR MINORS, ALL PART
OF THE TIGARD CRIMINAL CODE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
e. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
s
Director of Planning & Development arrived at 7:40 P.M.
3. RETIREMENT STUDY DISCUSSION
a. Finance Director presented the first and second reports from the r
1984 Retirement Plan Review which were prepared by Mark Johnsurs,
the Consulting Actuary. She advised Council of the status of the
review and felt the final Report would be to Council during
December.
Finance Director left at 7:50 P.M.
( 4. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS
a. Director of Planning & Development requested the following be
added to the Non-Agenda portion of the meeting:
.1 Election Complaint Information
Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 29, 1984
b. Councilor Scott requested the followiruj be added to None-Agenda for
discussion:
.2 City Newsletter
.3 Personnel Rules Review By Attorney
5. BUTTERFIEL_D CAPITAL CORP./WESTLAND INVESTMENT CO. .- CPA 20-84/ZC 13 -84
FINAL ORDER CONSIDERATION
a. Director of Planning 6 Development recommended Council adopt the
ordinance setting forth the findings from the Public hearing.
b. ORDINANCE NO. 84-66 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND UPHOLDING
1-11E PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A COMPREIIENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT (CPA 20-84) AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
C. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
6. PACIFIC WESTERN BANK - CPA 21 -84/LC 14-84 FINAL ORDER CONSIDERATCON
a. Director of Planning 6 Development recommended Council adopt the
ordinance setting forth the findings from the Public Hearing.
b. ORDINANCE NO. 84-67 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND UPHOLDING
THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A COMPREIIF_NSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT (CPA 21-84) AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
C. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
7. WESTERN INTERNATIONAL - SDR 12/84 DISCUSSION
a. Director of Planning 6 Development gave a brief synopsis of the
history on this item and presented a letter from Western
International Properties which requested the Council consider
initiating a Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
b. Citizens expressed a desire to speak on this issue.
Ray Ems, Developer of Rollings Hills Plat N2, wanted Council to be
aware that a storm sewer outlet would be needed on the plat at the
end of 74th Street, south of Cherry.
Mr. Fred Jensen, 7450 SW Cherry, supported the CPA request.
Debra Naubert, Chairperson of NPO #5, stated that the comp plan
does need to have the language reconstructed for the buffer areas
between commercial and residential zones and the vegetation within
the buffer.
C. Lengthy discussion followed regarding the merits of a CPA
application. Consensus of Council was to hold a neighborhood
meeting to inform the citizens and NPO of the issues. Councilors
Scheckla, Scott, and Brian volunteered to distribute flyers in the
Rolling Hills area advising citizens of the meeting.
x Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 29, 1994
d. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to
initiate a CPA review of Policy 11.5.1 with the Planning
Commission hearing scheduled for 11/13/84 and the Council hearing
on 11/26/84. Staff is to work with "he NPO and citizens and
schedule an information meeting during the week of 11./5/84 in the
Rolling Hills neighborhood. Consensus of Council was to have a
member of Planning Staff chair the meeting.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
e. Consensus of Council was to table the final order until CPA issues
are resolved.
8. SUBSIDIZED HOUSING DISCUSSION
a. Director of Planning & Development requested Council table final
order consideration on this i. sue until he, the Mayor, and Legal
Counsel have had an opportunity to meet with LCDC and try to
resolve the problems.
b. Consensus of Council. was to table until Director of Planning &
Development reported on the LCDC meeting.
9. DISPATCH CONTRACT/RFP - CONSULTANT
a. Councilor Scott stated she had not received enough information yet
to file a report. She wished this item placed on a future agenda.
{
10. APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 22, 1984
a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve
minutes with the following amendment: Page 7, Subsection 17.2,
a. , second subparagraph should indicate that the Paul Phillips
signs are being hidden by other political signs.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
11. AUTHORIZE LEASE PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR POLICE COPIER
a. Councilor Scott requested more information on this item, i.e.
copies of the RFP and bids received.
12. RECEIVE AND FILE:
o Volunteerism Non-Staff Follow--Up Report
o APWA Report
a. Councilor Scott requested more information. She felt the APWA
Report was incomplete and wanted to know what monies were expended.
13. APPROVE HARDWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. , OREGON BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT LOAN -
RESOLUTION NO. 84-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL SUPPORTING
t HARDWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. OREGON BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT FUND PROJECT
PROPOSAL.
Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 29, 1984
a. Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
14. NON--AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff
.1 Election Information
Director of Planning & Development presented for Council
information two pieces of information. (1) a memorandum from the
City Administrator to the Finance Director regarding an alleged
election law violation. lie reported that staff has turned this
over to the Secretary of State's office for further review. (2)
A copy of the Offense Report which was taken by the Tigard Police
Department with an alleged Criminal Mischief charge regarding
political sign tampering. This case has been turned over to the
District Attorney's office for further review.
Councilo, s Scutt &nd Scheckla expressed concern over this
information being released and questioned why prior election
problems had nut been brought to the Council in this manner, They
requested more information on why this was made public and who
authorized the information to be released.
.2 Newsletter
Councilor Scott expressed her displeasure with the late mailing of
the City Newsletter. She requested this be done more timely in
the future.
Councilor Scheckla and Scott requested that their Council mail be
opened more timely and also date stamped.
.3 Personnel Rules
Councilor Scott requested that Legal Counsel review the Personnel
Rules which are being drafted before final action by Council.
.4 Councilor Scott expressed her displeasure with a transmittal she
saw written by Frank Currie on 9-2784. She requested a report on
this at a future meeting.
15. . ADJOURNMENT: 9:07 P.M. \
t 1
civ..
/De puty City Recorder - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
r a-yor - City of Tigard
v
(lw/2115A)
Paige 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 29, 1984
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7_6154
P O BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice
BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising RECEIVEp
• City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice
P . O. Box 23397
• ❑
Duplicate Affidavit
• Tigard, OR 97223 CITY
TIGANI)
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON, )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss.
1, Sus a.. PinkieY_ __ __ --------
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tigard Times
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at—__— Tigard ___in the
aforesaid county and state; that the
pity Council Speeial Meeting
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for 1 successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
Oct . 25
G V� J
�lub and or o before me this Oct ' 2 5 , 1984
otary Public for Oregon
My Commission Expires: 9/20/88
AFFIDAVIT
h
AGENDA ITEM # _ - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council
wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but time may
require that we schedule your items for a future agenda. Please contact the
City Administrator as to agenda scheduling. Thank you.
NAME, ADDRESS 6 AFFILIATION ITEM DESCRIPTION
+ C JCNA, �X.- -7 4 So S W S
.las r •y.,.o._
Xc: t
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY /�
AGENDA OF: October 29, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMIITED: October 23, 1984 _ PREVIOUS ACTION: Council voted_— _
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: _Ordinance _ to approve request on 10-22-84
for Butterfield (CPA 20-84)_._—...-- PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton
REQUESTED BY: City Council
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: (bul 124^44 -,IL' CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On October 22, 1984, the City Council held a public hearing on a request for a
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment from Medium Density to Medium High Density. x
The property contains 2.9 acres and is located at 9815 SW Walnut Place. The
Council voted 4-0 at the October 22, 1984, City Council meeting to approve the
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment request. An ordinance adopting the
amendment is attached.
f
g
S
3
a
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
r
SUGGESTED ACTION
i
Adopt the attached ordinance.
0733P/dmj
ORDINANCE NO. 84-
Paige 3
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: October 29, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: October 24, 1984 - PREVIOUS ACTION: Public Hearing at
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Ordinance 10/22/84 City Council Meeting
for Pacific Western Bank (CPA 21-841 PREPARED BY:
R':QUESTED BY: City Council
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: >/M CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On October 22, 1984, the City Council held a public hearing on a request to
amend the Comprehensive Plan Map on 3.78 acres south of 7150 SW Sandberg from
Heavy Industrial to Commercial Professional, At that meeting, the Council
voted 4-0 to approve the request and directed staff to prepare an ordinance
adopting the amendment. An ordinance is attached for Council. consideration.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adopt the attached Ordinance.
(EAN:cz/0735P)
CITY OF TIGARD OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: October 29 1984 — AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: October 25. 1984PREVIOUS ACTION.. Postponed from Oct. 22
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SDR 12-84 — Meeting Public Hearing Oct. 8, 1984
Final Order, Western International.... PREPARED BY: William A.., Monahan
REQUESTED BY: City Council
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
At the Council meeting of October 22, the applicant, Jim Newman of Western
International, and residents of the Rolling Hills Subdivision requested that
th Council postpone action on the final order for SDR 12-84 . The postponement
was granted to allow them to develop a compromise solution to be presented to
the Council on October 29, 1984.
The Council should allow the parties to present their suggested course of
action concerning Policy 11.5.1 and determine what action is necessary on the
part of the Council.
The final order provided to the Council at the october 22, meeting is
attached. This order should not be adopted unless the Council determines that
no additional delay or negotiations are necessary.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Allow the parties to present the results of their negotiations and
determine the Council's course of action.
SUGGESTED ACTION
The Council should allow the applicant and the spokesman for the residents of
Rolling Hills to present their proposal. The Council then should direct staff
how to proceed.
(WAM:cz/0732P)
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 84---,.—
A
4 -,._A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR A SITE DESIGN REVIEW
REQUESTED 8Y WESTERN INTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES, FILE NO SDR 12-84, UPHOLDING
THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON POLICY 11.5.1, AND REVERSING THE. PLANNING
COMPASSION DECISION ON THE RAILROAD CROSSING REQUIREMENT, ENTERING FINDINGS
AND CONCLUSIONS.
The Tigard City Council heard the above application at its regular meeting of
October 8, 1984. Alan Fox represented the applicant. The following
individuals either spoke or were represented in favor of the application:
Wayne Jolly, F.C. Jensen, Carol Stewart, Richard Alberts and Fred Trumble.
Several members of Neighborhood Planning Organization #5 appeared in
opposition to the application.
The Council finds the following FACTS in this matter:
1. The applicant, Western International, requested approval to
partition (MLP 2-84) a 6.9 acre parcel into three lots of 2.5, 2.4,
and 2.0 acres each. Site Development Review approval to construct
one industrial office building on each of the proposed parcels was
also requested. The property is zoned I--P (industrial Park) and is
{ located on the northeast corner of 72nd Avenue and Tech Center Drive
(Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 IDC, Tax Lots 700 and 800) . The information
supporting this request is found in Planning File Nos , SJR 12-84 and
MLP 2-84,
2. The two applications were approved by the Planning Director on July
26, 1984, subject to conditions. The decision for SDR 12-84 was
appealed to the Planning Commission by the applicant because of the
requirements outlined in Conditions number 1 and 4 of the Director's
approval. The requirement for a sidewalk along Tech Center Drive
and the responsibility of constructing a portion of the proposed
Tech Center Drive railroad crossing were the specific subjects
contained in the appeal.
3. An adjoining neighbor also appealed the SDR 12-84 decision on the
grounds that sufficient buffering had not been provided.
4. The Planning Commission heard the appeals on September 4, 1984. The
Commission voted unanimously to uphold Policy 11.5.1. The
Commission voted, with one dissenting vote, not to require the
applicant to provide the railroad crossing.
5. The Council had before it the record of the proceedings before the
Planning Commission. The matter was brought before the City Council
under Section 18.32.090 D.
RESOLUTION NO. 84-
Page 1
6. The relevant approval criteria in this case are the Statewide
Planning Goals 1,2,9, and 11, City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan
Policies 2.1.1 and 11.5.1; and Community Development Code, Chapter
18. 1.20.
Based upon the record in this case, the Council makes the following FINDINGS:
1. Statewide Planning Goal #1 is met because the City has adopted a
Citizens Involvement program including review of all development
applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) . In
addition, all public notice requirements were met.
2. Statewide Planning Goal #2 is met because the City applied all
applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan
Policies and Development code requirements to the application.
3. Statewide Goal #11. is met because public facilities are available to
the site.
4. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1 .1 is satisfied because
the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding properties
were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on
the applicants proposal.
5. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 11.5. 1 is not satisfied
because the applicants proposed site plan does not contain the
required 50 foot setback and buffer on the north side.
6. Community Development Code Chapter 18. 120 is met by the conditions
attached to this approval.
The Council adopts the following CONCLUSION of law:
1. Based upon Findings 1,2, and 3 above, the Council has determ:nc-d
that the applicant' s proposal meets the applicable Statewide
Planning Goals.
2. Based upon Finding 5, the proposal shall be modified to be
consistent with Policy 11.5. 1.
3 . Based upon Finding 6 the Council has determined that the applicant's
proposal, as modified by the conditions of approval is consistent
with Chapter 18.120 of the Community Development Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
The Council therefore ORDERS that the above referenced request be, and hereby
is, APPROVED 4ubject to conditions set forth below:
1. The applicant' conform to Policy
s site plan shall be revised to
11.5.1 of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
2. The applicant shall be responsible for constructing a railroad
% crossing across the Southern Pacific: Tracks or construction of a
l cul—de—sac. The application for the railroad crossing must be
prepared and plans for the crossing must be submitted prior to
issuance of building permits.
RESOLUTION NO. 84—
Page 2
3 . Standard half-street improvements including sidewalks, curbs, street
lights, and driveway aprons shall be provided along the 72nd Avenue
and Tech Center Drive frontage. A sidewalk shall not be required
along the Tech Center Drive frontage.
4. Seven (7) sets of plan—profile public improvement construction plans
and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a
registered civil engineer, detailing all. proposed public
improvements shall be submitted to the City's Engineering Division
for review.
5. Construction of proposed public improvemeni.s ahM11 ^^t
until after the Engineering Division has issued approved public
improvement plans (the Division will require posting of a 100%
performance bond), the payment of a permit fee and a sign
installation/streetlight deposit. Also, the execution of a street
opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur
prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public
improvement plans.
6. Prior to issuance of building permits, a revised site plan for the
eastern parcel (Building A), containing the items noted below, shall
be submitted for Planning Director approval:
a. Parking facilities and driveways consistent with Chapters 18. 106
and 18.108 of the Code.
b. Bicycle rack placement and design.
c. Projected use of the building and a justification of the number
of parking spaces.
7. Prior to issuing building permits on the two weste-n parcels
(Building Band C), the following information shall be submitted for
Planning Director review and approval:
a. A revised grading plan
b. A revised utilities plan
c. A revised site plan which includes:
(1) parking facilities and driveways consistent with Chapter
18. 106 and 18. 108 of the Code including a justification of
the number of parking spaces based upon the anticipated use
of the buildings
(2) bicycle rack location and design
(?) a minimum of one, two-way driveway, 24 feet in width
d. An amended landscaping plan including:
(1) location of the trees along the northern property line that
are not shown on the "Existing Site Conditions: sheet
RESOLUTION NO. 84—
Page 3
(2) preservation of this group of trees for buffering purposes
(3) retention of as much as possible of the northern landscaped
' strip that was originally proposed
(4) screening along the northern property line that is
consistent with Chapter 18.100 of the Code
e. A lighting plan which will be compatible with residences to the
north.
8, Prior to occupancy of any building, plant materials shall be
approved landscaping plan For the
installed as shown on the
corresponding lot.
9. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final
below. The third phase must be initiated within
decision date noted
three years or a new Site Development Review application will be
necessary.
This resolution shall become effective upon it's approval by the Council and
signing by the Mayor.
PASSED: This day of 1984.
Mayor — City of Tigard
ATTEST:
Deputy City Recorder — City of Tigard
(EAN:bs/0714P)
i
E
i
}
4
RESOLUTION NO. 84—
Page 4
October 24, 1984
Mr. Bill Monahan
Planning Director
City of Tigard
12755 SW Ash
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Mr. Monahan,
Western International Properties has been working closely with
the City and the neighborhood of Rolling Hills regarding the
impact of the setback requirement on our proposed Tech Center
project. In particular, we have concentrated our efforts on
solving problems of the property owners that are directly
effected by our proposed project.
In discussions with the neighbors and other individuals
connected with the City, it has been proposed that the
Comprehensive Plan be interpreted to allow for the project we
contemplate and to allow it to commence at an early date. One
way to modify the plan is to exclude the five effected
residential parcels from the setback provisions of the plan.
I would encourage the staff to recommend to Council that they
proceed with the plan change and allow us to commence
construction.
On another subject, the neighborhood at large should be aware
that the sewer line we are prepared to extend along the
residential parcels will provide service for the entire
Rolling Hills sub-division should the neighbors wish to extend
the service accordingly.
Please call me with your comments as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
WESTERN INTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES
James . Neuman
VAPOWnMhrutlorofPropwtl" 1805NIh-P9rCksanStreel HIylli d,O,egnn97209 503?41 7498
' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
{ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: October 29, 1984 AGENDA ITEM
DATE SUBMITTED: October 24, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: -- ----
HEVUESTED BY: Tigard Po11Ce Department
of Title 7 --
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
This ordinance revision is necessary to protect the general welfare and safety of
the people of the City of Tigard because the current provisn-ons are out of dote,
and in part have been declared unconstitutional. By approving the proposed
revisions, it will allow us to use Municipal Court to charge suspect(s) in Municipal
Court, thereby eliminating the need to drive to Hillsboro for the signing of complaints
by citizens, as well as traveling to Hillsboro for court appearances. It will cut
C down on police and citizen travel time, and cut down on overtime paid ay the police
department.
In addition to the Code revisions, we are proposing an ordinance prohibiting
interfering with police K-9's. _
aaaaaasaaaxx==vaaxxxacxcx===xax=vxccc==x==cx-----
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
To continue to use the District Court, thereby causing police and citizens to
travel to hillsboro to comluct criminal proceedings for complaints and court
appearances
----------------
SUGGESTED ACTION
Recaamiend council approve the T.M.C. criminal code Title 7 revisions as are
requested.
G
i
I
i
CITY OF TIGARD
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
i REPORT NO. 1
1
. t.
Prepared by
Mark 0. Johnson, :.S.A.
Consulting Actuary
i
TI M1
080884
MILLiMAN i ROBERTSON, INC. CONBULTINO ACTUARIC•
MILLIMAN & ROBERTSON, Ii.C.
CoNSULTINO ACTUARIES
IOI S.W. MAIN-SUITE 026
PORTLAND.OREGON 07204
ALLAN D-LECs r S A 5031227-06-34
D-0 —CNE'SA
LARRY D SASEIC F SA
JANCSA OEROUIST.FCAS
GCORGCL SEA—rSA
AV
DIOR RIKEPSTAFC fCAS
JANCT r SLEAANCY r SA
THOMAS;RLEAKNEY r SA
WILLNN f RLUHN,r SA
SRUNO V ROIN.r SA
E R°"DYr`A
STCgNcAugust 9, 1984
STENINK.r SA
RDSER . M
T. —ASELL F SA
R CHANGE.[',r SA
LYON10N N..JHCq.r SA
NARK A C.CS.ER,r SA
BARYON N.CLENNOK F SA
RO\ERT L COLLCTT,r SA
JOHN►COOKSON.r SA
JAMES A CURTIS r SA
THOMAS K.CUSTW r SA
GARY L DANLNAN.F SA
DRCW S IDA"F SA
CNRISTM J.DCOWArDNERS r SA
q W"tS A DORAN,r SA
ROSERT N.OBEYER r SA
XrFCRTT DUKES FSA
ROSERT J DYNOWSKI,F SA
JON.S ECKERT.r SA
Jam"S COWARDS.r CA Retirement Review Committee
CARY S.MOW.F SA
DARIELJ-fW.ERTY,rCAS. City of Tigard
JONN E.rOUI Y.r SA
CARP D-rRANRLIN.F SA
JANCs A OGRES r SA
DENNIS J.ORAE r SA
MYRICK J.GRANVAR.r CA.S.
DENNIS L GRAVES.r SA
JANET S GRAVES f CA S Dear Members of the Committee:
CHARLES W NASCCK.f SA.
DALE S NAGSTRON,F SA
VMLMN A N1ILVORSON.F SA
RONALD Q.NARR.F,,. Re: 1984 Retirement Plan Review
REDID NEMML f$A
J.ALAN HEMINGTON.f SA
DOUGLAS C..OLDEN,r SA
S'Lv'O'NG"`r'" This is our first in a series of reports to the Committee. e
I 'rNTO.R ISAACSON.r sA
NO.A"DN'TGF`A purpose of this report is to present our preliminary findings on
GREGORY O JACOSS.f SA
K O.JOHNSON.r SA
:.E..HKwASKLFS. the adequacy of projected retirement income from the City's
JUCI INC J.HEATING.I*SA
UOL�•KLn.E,rCAs current programs.
GERALD,.KGOCR,r CA
DAVID W.KRUEGER.f SA
TWO—D.LEC,f K
JOHN M.I[NscR.I.SA We will discuss our findings at your meeting on August 9 an
LEONARD"J.LEONG.r SA
i n1[OE
—T
—IS
NANON.r S.A.
NARKL 010W FSA answer any questions you may IL*
have.
MALAN LITTLE.F
1.—ELJ NAHONEY,FSA
MUN J.--SON.FSA Sincerely,
ROSCRT G.N r_r SA
DANIEL J..CC^R—Y F SA
MMJ.AEL A==Y-
DOUG-As
f S A TZ
NICNAEL A r,CA3 /
NI K/C1 r S.A
STEVEN J..IKRALO.F S A.
EDWARD.NONORIC.f SA
DANIEL q NICNGLS,r SA
DAVIDr OWEN,.SA Nfark 0. J hnson, F.S.A.
SRUCC T.OGG r SA
RG.ERTw'J..D., SJ. Consul i n Actuary
RIC.IARD C.OSTLAV.r SA
GREGORY n gKCq.r SA
RAJL- '-E
'So"G'SO
J LYNN gEA600Y,F S A
NARr•AR[T C;(ARSON,r iA MO J:s m
MIS E.VETE WSON.F SA
,.,,"OND L PISCRT A.I RYOR.r SA
.C:KOWSKI,r SA encl .
RO
OO.ALO A RNOLL•r u
STANCE•A SC
RORTS.f S
" A
STUART A OSERTSO..r SA
wuT..S RUOLAND.f SA
JON.R SCNNEINER,r SA
PAULA S.SCOLIA[.F SA
DONALD J.SC6AL.f SA
T T.O".&SIMESTER,f SA
JOSEPH D.sINTCN.r sJ
WILLOW D.SNAK F SA
JON.S.SNYDER.C.F SA
STEW.D.SONNER,r SA
DENNIIJ L STANLEY,r SA
KAREN I.STEf/CN,IF SA _
OCNIS J.SULL'VAN.r SA
DOUGLAS O.TAYLOR.r SA
WKLUW S-T.IDNA♦<.f SA
GERALD G.TOE F SA
MAK A.TRIES,r&A.STANLEY•TULIK F SA
JAMES,R.TT'L.CR.I SA
SIM=N.VAMMR E11 f SA.
MEWR.WANGr SA
ALO R.-COMM V SA
I .ARD E._.TL r.SA
.A:..ARO-I.KENWERDCR,r SA
SRUCE W WINTER.Or.r S.A
SRUCE L W 000 AN.r CA
WCNOEIL.ILL INAN,r S.A 110761
JAMLS H..,a",f SA 110761 ,�,/E�
T-I,.=EAPOLIS
AL"N" • ATLANTA - CHICAGO DALLAS DENVER HARTFORD HOUSTON AN FR INDIANAPOLIS LOS ANGELES - MILWAUKEE (gyp
NEW YORK OMAHA PHILADELPHIA PHOENIX PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE WA$NINGTO®8@884
ASSOCIATCO IN CANADA WITH ECKLER. 6ROw N. Sr-^,AL L CO. '-TD
f
CITY OF TIGARD i
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
3
REPORT NO. 1
t
TABLE OF CONTENTS
s
page
, 1
Scope of the Report . . . . .
. 2
Basic Concepts. . . . • • • • • . • ' ' '
Retirement Income Projections . • • • • • . • • ' '
Oregon PERS . • • • • • • • • . ' ' ' '
Tables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
.I
i
i
TI M3
080884
i
_. -CONSULTING ACTUARIEe
--MILLIMAN i ROOERTSON. INC -
CITY OF TIGARD
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
SCOPE OF THE REPORT
This report contains the results of our preliminary review of the City's
current retirement programs.
The first section of our report discusses the concept of replacement
ratios that we will be using to analyze the adequacy of retirement
benefits. We have also included a description of the two basic types of
retirement plans; defined benefit and defined contribution.
j The next section illustrates the projected benefits from your current
( plans for career employees.
f .
The third section compares your plan with the Oregon PERS:
TI M4
'1- 080884
-MILLIMAN i ROBERTSON. INC. CONSULTING ACTUARIES -
CITY OF TIGARD
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
BASIC CONCEPTS
Our analysis of retirement income will be based on the concept of the
replacement ratio. Replacement ratios are calculated in this report as
the percentage that the initial annual retirement income bears to the
annual compensation in the last year of employment. For example, an
employee who earned $10,000 between age 64 and 65 and retired at age 65
with a plan benefit of $2,000 per year would have a replacement ratio of
20%.
Since both the City and the employees are contributing substantial
amounts to Social Security, it is appropriate that Social Security bene-
fits be included in a study of this type. If the employee is married at
retirement, Social Security benefits would be substantially greater, but
we have illustrated only the benefits the employee would be entitled to.
The usual objective of a retirement program is to provide adequate in-
come to a career employee. The definition of a career employee can vary
by industry or employer. In this report we show projected benefits at
various retirement ages for police officers who enter the plan at age 25
and other employees who enter at ages 25 or 35. Those employees enter-
ing the plan at higher ages would, most likely, have had an opportunity
to accumulate some retirement savings with a previous employer's program.
TI M5
i -2- 080884
MILLIMAN A ROBERTSON. INC. --CONSULTING ACTUARIEB
r
l
( It should not be the City's responsibility to supply a fully adequate
retirement income for employees who serve less than a career. Based
upon our previous discussions with the committee, a "career" is being
defined as employment from age 25 to retirement.
Projections are shown at retirement ages of 50, 55 and 60 for police
i
officers and at ages 58 and 62 for all other employees. All Social
Security benefits are calculated for earnings with the City from entry
i
S
age to retirement but payable at the normal retirement age for Social
Security.
1 A popular rule of thumb for determining the adequacy of retirement
i income is that total income from pension benefits and Social Security
I
should equal about three-fourths of final salary for a career employee.
The goal is usually set higher for low-wage employees and lower for
high-wage employees to counteract the effect of our progressive income
tax structure. Income taxes are usuclly u larger portion of pre-retire-
ment gross pay for higher-paid employees; for example, an employee in
k
the 20% tax bracket would be trying to replace 80% of his pre-retirement
income after retirement and an employee in the 30% tax bracket would be
trying to replace 70% of his income to maintain the same standard of
living as before retirement. Future regulations on the taxation of
Social Security benefits will be to the detriment of the higher-paid
employees more than the lower-paid employees.
-3- TI —
0808888 4
---MILLIMAN 6 ROBERTSON, INC. --CONSULTING ACTUARIES
There are basically two types of retirement plans. One is called a
defined benefit plan and the other is called a defined contribution
plan.
A defined benefit plan contains a formula ti-lat Specifies a levPl of
monthly benefit at retirement based upon parameters of length of service
and earnings. The benefit is guaranteed by the taxing power of the
source from which security may be
City, which provides the basic
derived. The cost of the program is an unknown which is estimated
periodically by the plan' s actuary.
E
t
A defined contribution plan takes , in many ways, an opposite approach.
A given sum of money, usually a percentage of payroll , is contributed
each year on behalf of all eligible employees. The cost of the program
i
is known in advance and the level of benefits is the big unknown. The
benefit is determined by the amount of money accumulated at the time o
retirement, which can be difficult �o predict.
In summary, it can be said that the risk in a defined benefit plan is
placed on the sponsor, while the risk in the defined contribution plan
is placed on the participant.
In order to make benefit projections for our illustrations, we have made
the following assumptions:
Future Sslaries - We have assumed that salaries will increase at
the rate of 6.0% per year.
4 --CON SULTI NG ACTUARIES—"�'M —
_ --MILLIMAN 6 ROBERTSON. INC _
Social Security - We have used the projected Primary Insurance
Amount (PIA) only; no family benefits. Past salaries were assumed
to increase at the historical national average rate.
Interest Earnings - We have assumed that employee contributions
will be credited with an average of 71% interest each year.
Employee Contribution Accounts -
Police Officers - 6% of pay
All Other Employees - 8% of pay
Conversion Factors - The conversion of accumulated account balances
to monthly income benefits was assumed to be in accordance with the
current factors for Oregon PERS. These factors were chosen so that
j future comparisons with PERS will be on a consistent basis.
i
TI M8
080884
-MILLIMAN 6 ROBERTSON. INC. -CONSULTING ACTUARIES
CITY OF TIGARD
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
RETIREMENT INCOME PROJECTIONS
Table 1A shows hypothetical police officers with gross annual earnings
of $15,000, $20,000, $25,000 and $30,000 at entry age 25 into the City's
pension plan. Column (F) represents the projected PIA replacement ratio
payable at normal retirement age. As expected, the PIA replacement
ratio is greater at the lower levels of income due to the nature of the
Social Security System having a bias toward the lower-paid wage earners.
Column (G) of Table 1A shows the projected benefit replacement ratios
from the City's plan. Column (H) represents the benefit derived from
the 6% employer (pick-up) contribution and column (I) represents the
C benefit from the defined benefit formula.
The results in column (E) indicate that the City's plan for police
officers, together with Social Security, provide adequate or more than
adequate retirement benefits for career police officers to replace pre-
retirement after-tax income, based upon the assumpticns used in this
report.
Table 1B illustrates projected replacement ratios for employees other
than police officers assuming an 8% of pay contribution each year.
TI M9
-6- 080884
MILL IMA N A ROBERTSON, INC. _-CONSULTING A C T U A R I E S
The results in column (E) indicate that the City's plan, together with
Social Security, provide adequate retirement benefits for career employees
at the lower end of the pay scale and marginally adequate benefits for
career employees at the higher end of the pay scale.
For employees who are hired at age 35, total retirement income will be
less than adequate. It is not likely that these employees will retain a
retirement program from previous employers, so you may want to consider
this group in your definition of "career" employees.
Participants who enter the City's pension plan at older ages and expect
to have only 10 or 20 years under the plan will receive proportionately
lower pension benefits but, assuming they held previous employment
covered by- Social Security, retirement benefits at other employment
prior to being employed by the City will add to retirement income and
may make the total adequate. It should not be the responsibility of
this plan to provide an adequate total- retirement income for non-career
emp,oyaes.
_�- TI M10
080884
--MILLIMAN 6 ROBERTSON. INC. __---CONSULTING ACTUARIES
CITY OF TIGARD
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
OREGON PERS
We have been asked to compare the City's programs with the Oregon Public
Employes Retirement System (PERS) . PERS is a defined benefit plan with
many similarities to the police officer's plan, especially prior to
1981. In 1981, PERS changed from a combination defined benefit plus a
defined contribution plan, to a contributory defined benefit plan.
Table 2 shows the projected replacement ratios for the City's plans in
column (D). This ratio is expressed as a percentage per year of service
in column (E) . The corresponding figures for PERS are in columns (F)
and (G).
As you can see, unde.• the assumptions used in this report, the City's
career police officers have higher projected benefits in the current
plan than in PERS after age 55, but lower benefits prior to age 55.
All other employees would have greater retirement benefits under PERS in
all cases illustrated.
If the City merges with PERS, employees hired after the merger date
would have there benefits determined solely by PERS statutes. There are
many alternatives for calculating benefits for current plan members
prior to the merger date. For example, current plan members could have
their PERS benefits determined as if they h. ' been members from
TI M11
-8- 080884
MILLIMAN i ROBERTSON. INC -CONSULTING ACTUARIES-____.
(a) six months after date of hire (retroactive) , or
(b) the later of (a) or July 1, 1973 with a $4 past service
benefit for a specified period, or
(c) the later of (a) or merger date with no past service benefits.
Based upon the above, the employee data you submitted to us, and the
procedures established for determining PERS employer contribution rates,
we estimate the following rates for the City.
Police All Other Total
Officers Employees for City
For Current Service 13.76% 8.53% 10.21%
Retroactive Service 5.07 2.44 3.28
Total City Contribution
as a Percent of Covered
Payroll 18.83% 10.970/0' 13.49%
i
These rates do not include the 6% contribution required to be paid by
the employees or picked up by the employer.
Since a retroactive merger provides a full benefit to the eligibility
date as if the City had always been in PERS, there would be no reason to
continue the current plan with Banker's Life for police officers. All
future benefits would be paid from PERS, so current funds would not be
required to be maintained by Banker's life. Each $100,000 of employer
money would reduce the police rate by about .25%
If the committee chooses, we will provide a more detailed analysis of
PERS alternatives and costs in our next report.
TI M12
r '9" 080884
-----MILLIMAN 6 ROBERTSON. INC -------CONSULTING ACTUARIES ---
i
4- N N N N
d 4- C r.. � 'n N N d d d d Ln
Lo
Q m N N
t0
F-
G
G G
td-0 4 O O O O d d d d
r; 10
ON N W
A N N
4- L
CJ +j
<
D �
0 , H
r U
eC
<
OC cocoO CO 01 01 0• C7% O
r... r: .
+jC�
d 0; o+ rn Z
d O M M M M 'D UD tD tD n ^ ^ ^ -
f
'u J
u
� O
a� z
r +� 1n NC) d d O
CO,r N Q1 O O N U
N I
C) V 7 M OM d M M M
d d M
U- M
� o v
VN N
I W
17)
Q 4'
�CD
i �D ON LO N N O
EO r- CO coaO d; .-+
> J
Oz
0^0 ^ ^ �O O O ON _4 4 u
O .4 . i Z>
4-3
W C)
1 " W
CC 2
O
W CD CD O F-
r O O O OCD O C:- O O O O
O O O O O G U O Q
O O O -D O v G O O W
d p C 1 C rte+ O N MM � � N M m
C •-4 N N M 0
rl cu
V-
LC� Z
N• N M M <
s- >U
d �
J
C
CoLO
OLn
'-Q L
� d
ce
y U
4-
4.- d
O .+CO
CLrl CD
i
y r Ull N CO
.- N 1-O
C Q 6 d
W
v 4-)
I
m y ,r
v- c,- , )
�a o cu
m �
r-
i
c
c o
-0 %0 %0 M M Cl) M00 00 00 co
C- 4) d d d d .
H � _ '-•i '--i rti .-� OW
; O N t0 t0 �0 W
M M M M N N N N
4- L M M Mm -
y 4-) C
Cl co
of U U
O �
•r
+a U
c6
cl: co co
r 3Q M M M M
4-3i6 .
c 4-2a O O O O °
6! O r r+ cn M M Cl) N N N N N N N N Z
MM M M
O F
V J
�O
cl
m
0)
w Z
Vir. N 'ark .-� .--� d Q, 00 m U•) 1'� d N N N O O L O
L O f� M O M O N I
. 7 M O cD N M M Cl)
d d M M d M M M
0
� O U d d MM d
U N N
W V>
CL I
C 0_
\ H
20 Ln d t1') r+ O 1- t1') t[) O 00 CO ML r E E co 00
00 d O n
O D. 41 L V W d rr n M ^ ^ t0 1A In �0 �D %0 Ln
Y p,•, 0 C f� f� t0 %0 U
+) " Z
.-•� W N
U f �
W
I � Z
LLJ
H
O O O O O O O O m
O O O O � � � � O O O O O O O O f
,o O O O O O O O O O O c O c O cD O
O O G J
41 0 u) O to O �n c ►n O W
CL G V1 Ln O Ln N N M r+ ON N OM r+ N N co
N M
4—
cd CJ
AA� M � N N Z
L >
d
U M M L
r6 L
61
Y N -
1
J
H
C
cu
N co
N
L :mn 00
t0 w m O ►n Ln Q r
N
E
D: W
L
� d
t N OG
4-1 J P-
>-,
0J O N N Ln M MCD
O
.,.CO 1
WQ
l -11-
I
N
CJ
rp
oo
t` f\
Cl- d CD Ll') Ln LC)
0', co 00
i r m k
W
Q
m w LL 4)w ^ t0 Ln CO %D N F
S- d LC) LD t1') M V
O <
O
Z
f
J
7
Ln r- 00 rn 0
C) r6 Lf) N Cn O 00 ON Z
Ln Cl. - r4 N N O
w
0-
CD o
� LD
W
C�l IA
00 Q� tD M 00
M M N N
\\ t1. 7 •r d M �O
O U
Z
r Q t1
�~r G. z
U N
Z
r O
H
U f
j C) Q
1 N U M n M r-
i W •r tt'1 O M M N NW
rp 0 > U N M M m
C) L
> � O
N Q
4J Z
O <
00 N CO N
d C) m tLn tLn � LO L0 Ln %D
L 4
J
CU
� J
CJ
N �
L Ln Ln
4.3 C Q¢ V N W N M
W L
O L
1•) GD
C M o
r
• r r •-� co
F- O
O Q
d
i
-12-
i
t
�I
i
CITY OF TIGARD
( r 1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
t \ REPORT NO. 2
I
I
Prepared by
Mark 0. Johnson, F.S.A.
Consulting Actuary
TII Al
100984
! MILLIMAN Ba ROBERTSON. INC
MILLIMAN 8c ROBERTSON, Ir C•
CONGULTING ACTUARIES
101 S.W. MAIN-SUITE 026
PORTLAND,OREGON 0720N wtNOCLI«,Ly.www r.S�,Wm.
303/227-0034
,,No fLCCw f SA
D.VIOV"C»C.r Sw
,Mm,o.fAftw,r SJ.
JAMES w.SC'Oy1ST,r CAS
GCOW.0 a ocz r Sw
o.vs r al[Iu1N[,•rrF rSCAi
w,LLw+r""""•r'w October 10, 1984
i SaU»o v 1G».r sw
s,taNcN D.lwwna r fA.
� wof[wT c u«r1c`L r sw
• wOKwT«.cNn»oL[w.r sJ.
«ALTO»r CNwuNM.r SA
«11wR A CHCS»C1a r SA
apltwT�coLLc�Ti Sw
Jo««w cDD11soN.
Jof[P»c cwo+.»c r fA
JA«ca w cuw,a,r s.+
T«O«AS A CUST�f.r f.•.
v.wT[.D.v�LNAN.f fA
TI«OT
S.J Mri
M[w
S.pwv10orR r r Sw
SCOTT a.D[»N40N.r fA
CNNNTIAN J OR1wOU�CM'r SA
MTLLIS A.DOwr`N.f Sw Retirement Review Committee
JJJpDON�NM . DI SA
A City
of Tigard
Cmt r
COWAMS.r CG
STCKN A C�1CM1CwG r SA
Dear Members of the Committee:
Dn»KL J.rLJ+Kwn.r CJLS
Jo.1N C.rOLC[r SA
M^°IX `C"C `[w r'A Re: 1984 Retirement Plan review
cAln o rwAN M.r Sw
Jns+[f w ao"S.r fA
The
D[NN1f J.Owns,r sw
T .w J.Ow11NNA»,r CwS
�� °""""'["` This is the second in a series of reports to the Committee.
CC
,UKT.1w.Ka•� present several alternatives for
NnwCN i Ow[CNfTCw,r fA
C»wwatl w.NAfCCaraw purpose of this report i s o plan programs
.
w C f Nn/1Two«..1w
woNwLonwww,arlw improving the City's current retirement p P
i woDCw«.w„»G►us.
wrJ10.«C««G/.f•n
J.ALAN M[wwNATO».r N
Ow[opw,N.MwwLC.rsw We will di
I, scuss our findings at your meeting on October 1 an
„�LNN.
DDC.NOLDCr.A
,no bNOULfA
answer any questions you may have
oNw.l,AkfON•rsA
*AIV M.M06 u
COOwT rSA Sincerely,
«Aww D.JONNfON.R sA
�,,,,,�J«[rT•fON•r cAf
tNOCN[«.w1L«rAwswl.r,A
L1N(«,a[ATINQ r fl
DouoL�s►aLf+c r tws
o[wALDT w°ocw ru
ULKK[.a°wwcw.i r.fw
DAvlow.0.LEC. w.►.aw
71S. .A.
T�rD,Nr D.L[GrfA Mark 0. J hn on,
Jo«N M.l[weta.►.4
utom=wJ"°"ar`w Consulti g tuary
rw[D[w1c T.L....IDN.r.A
i «wwwcanpatRlA
p_Kyl LnTL[,R aA
MICMl1[L J.MAMONCK/fA
MNN J.«►TTfONNT.r LA.
pAN1CL J.«OCwwT,�r MOJ:s m
«I(J1KL A«COwA T r Cwt.
«1CjN[LA NCa11/wwA•
pp{/DLA{M[Mw[f./SA
fT(KMJ.MMY1wl0.rfA
COwAaD�«q�O1NG r SA
� 1MOM�fG Kllq..r.fA
DANIEL P NICMOL'L r SA
DAY1Dr DO Kr"
faLICC 1 OG I fA
w°f[wT 1.0 O«OAL f.SA
w1CNAwD C D1T1Jw.r"
OwiDCwT.=.r
aAww[�
MtJa J.M•T[wWf�,rfA
J.LTNN KAfOOT./fA
NAwDAw[T C KAN[ON•/,fA
wN1i[.rtT[wSON.I.fA
wATNONo c�Nc:wwf■1.r.fw
. wplcwt w wwTOR R fA
wIL11U1 A w[M[wL r K
DONAaD A wn.OaL/CA
STANLCT w w°1[wTs r SA
1TUAwT A
wpJOAwNwa,CNtN►wafS,fp.ywLwOnOl.wNlKLO[oAtw.[CwAw1TN[f.Q Rr OrfrrN
SA.SS1AA
w.,
J
DOHA J./[GAL F
7.THamf farcarcR,
r N
Jof[PN a flNrov,r Sw
JONN f.,,,TD[w,a.r 1w
� 1T[KN 0.fONNdL r tw
ocNNw L 1TAe1tn:r aw .
wAwCN LSTCrr(N•/.fA
V K J.WN.IVMI.I fA
uOMf f.TA"AM.I.K
wMAUDG.VCM IIIA
5wKarfA
n a TYLaI r aA
Jw.TTL[R►f/L
w.vwNOtw CM Or SA �-T�`
wNow[w f.wANa rfA MILW wLE A�INNEAPoLIs
woNALow.w[er1[w rL' INDIANAPOLIS LOS ANGELES
w1C«AwO C.wNn[.r SA. A HARTFORD HOUSTON pCH.M yV.w "V#CMX..t SA. ALBT ATLANTA CMICAGO DALLAS DENVE N rAANCISCO•SEATTIC W/ariMINGT OY
f11Nt[w WNT'w rsw NEWYCOK-OMAHA•PHILADELPHIA•PNOCVIX•PORTLAND•SA
i f11UCC a.wOMwM V-
wf SOCIATCD IM CRNADA w�,N[CaLCw aAwTN[wf,aT
CITY OF TIGARD
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
REPORT NO. 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I
Page
Scope of the Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Retirement Plan Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Bankers Life Provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
PERS Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Benefit Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
r�
I
t.
t
i
E
i
TII A3
100984
MILL1KAN & ROBERTSON. iNc-
CITY OF TIGARD
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
SCOPE OF THE REPORT
This report presents our analysis of the items we were asked to review
at the August 9th rheeting of the Committee.
The first section of this report contains an outline of the major
provisions of the City's retirement plan for the police department
employees. For comparative purposes, we have also included the benefit
provisions of the Oregon Public Employes Retirement System (PERS) for
uniformed and non-uniformed members. The last page of this section
summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the police department
benefits vs. PERS uniformed members provisions.
The second section reviews, in general terms, several key elements of
the Bankers Life Contract.
The third section reviews the calculation of the PERS employer contribu-
tion rate.
The last section outlines several benefit alternatives for discussion.
L �
I
i
TII A4
1• "1" 100984
MILLIMAK & ROBERTSON.
R R are
00 trQ
N N
—4 r r N
O to cu
Ln 4- 3 Lt�O � i ]
R Gl +1
•a Q01+�r C w 4/ Q..= R
R Li R Ln R O �1 CI » r
F- L
CU--� R O N
O X GJ t ♦; p
> LT N R M E G. N•tm
•r yl Q •r L N O CO U 3 4)
C L L R C C LLA r J
rp r w N R 4--
Go
- Go w >-,
C
O r •.- C O O L RIncu
CJ L m
IA
1 Ln VQ 11 r O L C
n L 4- UUj i R
a' d Q4- W N C d L ]
I F
U
O
S-N IPQ Z
R R co N N f
r6 r N w LA R C1 J
to V- 3 N LA O L
O L +1 L 7
wz
Qf+�r C O QI dL R
Z
N L W---
>, R O r O
G E Q > t +a LA CJ CL.
N Li > Q1 N R w 7 N
Q•r L N N O �c 4- r J U
Q x r L CU W R IN C G
{ d r N R M >> d �� •r w�
I £ C Lr C Co O L d L
Cl R
V O LL r U N d R d C7
Z L In � 11 r >bL S C
go
[ N XN V- d •-C. d Qf
d d Q N ►+ G
1--
U
. ( � N C Z
W 47'
N N t
L Cl Cm N z
w m N 1-�•r L d'
W N O
R >-
wwL C O ILI
L N
a�O � a•� x�•r E }
> N r O L Q
LA r A 4- +j> N N
C N N C N L 4- CL-- L .0 L1 >> O
NR C f� W O O r U >-, R �..• d•� 0
cr R LA x U t 0/ LU d E�-
R OV N O
a I- K1 N N C1 C C� C
O/ N K> Om L b R O O s• r 0
QR L L E U ++ N
w O y 4)4- 4) N CL N L Z
I p� �L >- >4-tD R
U O Q O +� Q O M— N R C1
•r r
4-1 X•r M R O
r Gl 11 4- 11 —
y N L >
CL. W OG LD Q 1 U L O J
Z -4m i Lt0
� d a J
-4 Wit
41 A 4-Scyl
.. m
C j CJ C Q
E .r �
J
•J •r
LA- C
,NC r 1 •O w
r. 4-
r
.r 41 OC O
Vcn C 10 N N
r r CIO
qu
> W m
L
w
N
-2-
C
O
Nr
C N +-)
y •r tC C
i�
LC w c
TO �E
O L-
4-
4- p E C
yJ
S-
4-)•r'C 4-1N� O NN••�
+J d eta
C � V tA
L L ep
Z C 4-) 4- O 1] L
r p N O +J"0 A
V L C •r L r A
4- O L L 4- N m
wp4- 7 C N 6J W
ui -
r S.. d •3OA S
i
7 L
C u
u m <
go
C •r�
N O # E
C a' Z
O i A - L LLJ
d
e6 C F
N +� c 6J•r .N A L J
C 7 C E i N N ]
O p E C w A C
O r m
C
Z O N W A
O r L V L L A �y -a .- — V
.N. C 4- d .0 L C S-
41 3
p N O N C A 01 +J
Q C 47 +-)r r- C
V L C •.- L •r A A O N
N 4. y L L 4- N
C d' p +� 3t -
V C r d r N N C G T
Z L #OA N A O
I L -P r-
j A L d
� y.� r♦ N N O E
F- Cl
Z
WLLI
Z
D: z
F- � L •r O
W .0 A V 0
I C L C 41
N Q J&- O C L
E C d W
+' q 4J O O
L 4- cm V r O4-
O % O
A O r E 4J (D•r O
1-- •r
d Ni S-10 S- A A M C
r O O O C4--w 4- C .0 C O O
N T O •�
L r•r
I
A N ir4-jW A
L to
L d
. L. Z
� d•r• V- 0l 4- N 4- O O.
dWU O W CD �
C C O4- C �� <
N4-A ^ ^ A J
A .0 4/
f
4J u> Ul)
p•r V n N co
m co
C1
C0
cr
jj - a7
r !-
W N
41
r41
C r+ N C
` o
N
•C L A A O
•r V V V
d r-
c
a�
L 1 E
d L L
(a r r
4-P 4j
w
a d LA 4-
L L
L O 4-
C
C O.r
i d •r
4 7 1J u f
,a ea u
L 7 4-) O ¢
41 Q A
a-
aAi a� o 4- S- L I
N I •O E LLJ C
d 4- 4 W
C O E 4 L O
E �4-
< €
.r L O ] !
4-J O C O F
A t E 40•)0. vi U
al u u41 <
4- u
4A.0 L O r �4 O
O C LO
d is •rLO Lei aJ al ?
v� d f N ¢ E.0 ~
J
m
4-1 Z
V
O a) L al
N y� 4- r L
f ¢ G1 d W N L d
I N L
O
pl C C C O C
V +1 C O d E •r
r N
/ ¢ a c L.
o E
d O r d L. +a +� u
C a
LLJ E 44 r
N cr w cnZ
4- N
W L W c a) O O O L L
A NL Z
~ D up w O w O
�
I
aJ aEmi >,4-
�•
r�. � ,r L• �� L L Q
r dr W
OEv � o c4-w � to
d W r O O N -6-j a-
u
u 4J O
a) 4- E C N Q
N o L O N ++ O
c c
d 1[9 +,) ra N a) aJ
N
grad ¢ E.0 Z
I
J
C J
•r
t
V M qw
\ ^ m CO
a) N _p►
L
C O
N d +�
41 N O
^� 4J 4�
( d •r
C •r r
CO
w w
CI � C
_ n
+a W m m
A
ai
L
_4_
I
1
-)
�6 C
•p E
�t
M O C
r E
•r C L
+- +a 00 I
F-
m
' (v (1 to t
L•r O d
4-) d E
�I v L E� m
d I
a
0) i d•r
C O 4j
41 n' €
L
41 L 4- w ~ f
++ d O
� C E C•r C
C7>W L 4E!
N E �_ A 2
to
C4-
1 3 d
F
J
O
2
Z O
1 O 4J 0 L1
!n— O 41
r a)Vf
c a
fl �- �F �•r L
0 4-3
p� L
to C 41
= E v E-r C
4J >b
I J
CL r r0
r0 d cu C G! go LAJ 3 Cl
>% vt z
�� to L•r 00 Cr Z
t( W LV r00 O C
0 O r U L
C1 E�"� 4J C
ix
LAJ
F- O 0 V- 4- 61 .0 E O
y C O V •S•• L
4W 4-
r� 4j �oa 39.0 3oE i
r Cl y
OEv
7 � h
i9
4 CL."' b� 41 w CLO ;
E 7 0-� c
Vf +j.r Q �
i
yw wLEc
O O 0= Cl (U•r
J
d' Q
co
I �_ CD
OH
.-. O
1 N
.r •r
C 4_ r ..
•r �
C •r
r 4-
co Im
4l
4J W 00
�O
0!
�5�
N d i
•r•r
C X N
3•r
L ~ A
O
m CA
L cr
C c w d
O C L L
J y C y Lcc
n A
O N W O
A Z i, O O i
1-- A O 4J T
G1 +-J
N } 41 V
W A r t
a T O3 W f
1D 7 A L
N C O
7
N.0 H
N 4! 61 V
d +' 4-14-
LL. N
d
X 1-
A =
LON
a7 � �, Q -
E a 4-- W J
S-
4-
Q L d A m
C A
O W O O =
4-0
T O
O
N V
4.3t
OH A 4j .,...r
N CC W L 67 U r' t
d A r 'n7 •r 3
O
d
X .0
A 5-
C)
O bQN .Ci 40
V N
I
10:
'' V
U+j N Vn Z
� +� Q) U L. r
C N C C�E i-► L N U Of r C T4J A C 7 A VL4-m F- p L d•r O 7 F
I D N w + - Im d
l Q
01 O N 4 p G7 N W
0/ T L.r Y r-•- O
U O A4- AG� 'r
-r r � T.r•r A 4- Q
r d•r }t IJ cm— d
FE Z; H >- C c vc
Cl-W A X m r A r' Oqw Ln 4j
41
7- C0
CD p� Z C C 4-J.-1 t
f
J
T J
.r
A Ln W�t
co 00
Vf
•r
O
y .-+O
•r• 4.. r•n O
O F- '+
A O
41
C
•r C
i m C
C W m O
C
O
� Z
�- -6-
LL- N �
y X N N 4-
C:)
a 7 •'-
L
O �
w aJ N E 3
m •� QI Of L Q
4- (L)� O O•C L L
r C 1•� L N �O
O_
R) Z N W 0
1 �L7 O
cu
Ln 4J 4-) U
d'
Ly e0 X U3c 1
•r••�
d •r a/ r•• t
E _ toL m
• to C O W
4-
LA
L LL.
4A a
aJ aJ
J, •� U
N LL) N +-3 4-
¢ Ln aJ O
LL-
toXE ark Q cm L cr Z
t
40- a)
W LLA �•C L L J
=i W
co z
Z
Z N aJ O>- 4-A >>t 17
Cl
X
r t
1 +'N
Q
y.•� 7 1p L
CD CD L.0 N C O
t7.�� ►-•� 4-
Z
Q >> I 1
J
Ln
d •� I � >r
Q r > N
Z LL r •r U A lJ
X +P 0) U L •r
W 111 t C �10 1
�--� 41 i6 N U Of r C >I Z
�,.. L 4- •.- C 7 to i•�
W /C O•'- D F W 4- • O
v C L L m
W H~ 4Jw 6v0- a�
V
�.. OI a
y >> N 1•J O w LN N
V O L •� +�r r 4J W
r r N n7 4-
CL 4
O E v ++ >- c •r C U C
CL.W r X m r IO r O N
•p N •r � aJ N.0
' f.r r-1 4� r+ N A•r•r Z
t
� J
r
r
•r
vt
N ��
m�
CD
CD
41 O ��
r � C
•r-
N w c
W co G
C
a
0
v-
_ •r
� = N
O C
~ N W
N i
� y N
a 41 3 m
O X W
r —
G to
U
( t
O �
2 �
� - E
E J
WIA
' {
r 1
® 3
i C Z 1
C1 i O s
W U
O Ln 4- N
�• W O 3
G.
1 ¢ S-
VC)
N to
Z t
I
J
d U .
►- 4;06
im
Z `
�
N O
to
�- S-4-
W A O•r Tf F
O7 4A 0Cl-
d Q
O7 O r O
u o t O
C Ev c R
a LLJ d f
1 p �
E � Z
W
J
J
N
i C
O
41 ^d
En CO
.0 CYN
�--•O
C36 L .-.O
4J H
C L O
•� O �
N d '
O .0 O
L r
� E
i d W41
W
L
O
l_
COMPARISON OF CITY'S POLICE PLAN
WITH PERS
Advantage(+)
Disadvantage(-)
Retirement
Retirement Eligibility
Early Retirement Benefits -
Pension Formula
Average Salary
Cost-of-Living
Termination
Deferred Pension Eligibility
Death
Normal Form
25% Contingent Annuity -
� r
Return of Contributions
l
Disability
Pension Formula Years
Duty Minimum
( Definition of Disability -
1
Other
Eligibility for Coverage +
Portability
State of Oregon Taxation -
TII A7
-9- 100984
MILLIMA EROBERTSON. tsra
s
CITY OF TIGARD
( F
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
BANKERS LIFE PROVISIONS
currentlyThe has two separate contracts with theurcBankers
ase Lifeion
ContracNo. GA 3018 contains the money p
Prior to July 1, 1980 all
e department retirement program.
contributions fund, and
the funds JContr ft
employer pick up
No. GA 30418 is the funding vehicle for the defined benefit porton
the police department pian.
Contract No. GA 3018
One of the key elements in a money purchase retirement plan is the basis
on which an account balance is convertedaremavailabler,ethestableat hbelow
otime
of retirement. Although various optionscan b
compares the amount of frommonthly
BankessLife9at severa" traiht life" bed fferentt
tages weith the
purchased by $1,00
corresponding figures from PERS.
1 Bankers Oregon
Retirement Life PERS
50 $4.12 $7.27
4.52 7.86
55 5.03 8.67
60 5.72 9.79
65
Although we have not compared Bankers Life's purchase rates
with those
are not
of other insuran�feredb
companies,
We have found that they
tive
with the rates o Y PERS
It does not appear, from the language in the contract, that a lump-sum
i benefit is available at retirement.
Contract No. GA 30418
i
One of the key elements in a defined benefit plan is the basis on which
the actuary recommends Smwilleultimatelytbenequalmade.
allThe
benefitscontributions
plus investment earning
expenses paid, but the timing of the contributions is determined bythe
actuary. The actuary calculates current contributions by making 9-
projections and allocations using various assumptions and methods.
i
TII A5
-10- 100984
MILLIMA14 B. ROBERTSON ixa
i
not have chosen the same assumptions as Bankers Life,
Although we may ear to be reasonable in the
the set of assumptions that were used app
ly 1, ,1983 no malycostthetrighte of lbal parkpg�venl
aggregate. The Jt r
the
(S75,425) is, the `
data and calculations to be accurate.
However, since the City is a public employer, there is no standard for
a minimum deposit. The Bankers Life has a minimum deposit (23.6% of
payroll , or $142,411) in order or ble tax treatment" whering eichucannotdbe
status of your plan and its favors apparently not
justified by IRS statutes or regulations. The City has app Y
contributed at the recommended levels in the past and is being asked to t
make up the difference :n one year.
i
I
I �
l
1
C .
TII A6
-11- 100984
'41LLIMA ROBERTSON. txc _.__.
CITY OF TIGARD
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
PERS REVIEW
In our first report we compared PERS benefits with the City's plans.
For this report, we were requested to provide a more detailed analysis
of the costs and possible transition to PERS.
Since the police department plan has a different structure than the plan
for all other employees, we will treat them separately. It should be
remembered, though, that PERS will only recognize sworn officers as I
uniformed members, Any secretaries or dispatchers could only be clas-
sified as non-uniformed PERS members.
Police Officers
In order to avoid the maintenance of two separate plans, if the police
officers are to join PERS, we would recommend that current plan members
have their PERS benefits determined as if they had been members from six
months after date of hire. The plan with Bankers Life would be termi-
nated and assets transferred to PERS in an orderly fashion to help fund
past service benefits.
IBased on the employee data you submitted to us and the procedures
established for determining PERS employer contribution rates, we esti-
mate the following employer rate for police officers:
For current service 15.07%
{ Retroactive service
j 18.83%
! Reduction for transfer 7.85
of plan assets 1 8)
i
Employer pick-up 6.00
16.98%
Transfer of assets includes approximately $674,000 of employer funds in
GA 30418 and $332,000 of employee money in GA 3018. If the non-officer
employees of the police department do not join PERS, some of the above
funds will not be transferred.
All Other Employees
City employees who are not in the police department plan do not partici-
pate in the type of plan that will integrate easily with PERS for past
service benefits. Funds cannot be transferred from IRA's or deferred
i compensation plans to PERS without severe tax penalties to the individ-
uals. In fact, some employees have not invested their retirement
accounts but have chosen to use those funds as current income.
i
TII A8
L -12- 100984
MILLIMAN & ROBERTSON, Ixc.
f
Therefore, if this group of employees is to join PERS, it should do so
prospectively only. The employer contribution rate is as follows:
For current service 8.53%
Employer pick-up 6.00
14.53%
o are not sworn officers should be given
Police department employees wh
credit for earning higher benefits prior to the PERS merger. Therefore,
we would recommend some sort of arrangement to set as the value of
the benefits earned in the Bankers Life plan.
Transition
If the Committee decides to recommend a PERS merger, either the police i
officers alone or all employees, the following events would occur:
1. Draft integration agreement.
2. Obtain approval of 2/3 of employees affected.
3. Obtain approval of City.
4. Obtain approval of PERS.
5. Negotiate most advantageous method for withdrawal of assets from
Bankers Life.
6. Determine details of supplemental plan for non-uniformed police
department employees.
i
i
i /
t
TII A9
-13- 100984
MILLI?IAN 6 ROBERTSON. INC
CITY OF TIGARD
1984 RETIREMENT PLAN REVIEW
BENEFIT ALTERNATIVES
We were requested to suggest alternatives to the current plans to
ost
m rove benefits. The level of benefitopinion.
mprov
BankerstLifelismrecortmend�recommending
P the price tag. In our p
decided by hi h contributions to the police
rather conservative v(rla tine y hi gmett �dology. We believe some of the
department plan by} �, �Ffnr +od by the present level of contribu-
benetit impruve+ r+�� �r+ay „c
tions. If the Committee so whwe " perform a cost analysis on
all or some of the followingimprovements:
Police Department
Liberalize early retirement benefits.
- Include all W-2 wages in covered earnings.
Increase the pre-retirement death benefit.
Provide a more substantial duty disability benefit.
should be kept in mind that the City's plan was judged "better than"
It s You already
PERS in the aggregate in 1981 (the last test date).
some benefits that are more favorable
Chas choPERicesufohsome uimprovement.
listed above are probably theo
The money purchase contract with Bankers Life (GA
3018) s ouldand/or
be
negotiated to include the provision for a lump sum
witmore favorable conversion factors.
A1_or Em—10lees
should consider amending its plan for the police department to
The City The plan can be
include all employees in the defined benefit program.
amended to provide benefits that areof aslesser magnitude. Benefitsimilar in structure to in
offered to police employees,
total (including the 8� IRA) should not be greater than PERS benefits.
lTII A10
-14- 100984
CITY 0_TIG_- ARD,-c�I:I:GON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM- SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: 10/29/84 _
t'REVIOUS ACTION: N/A ------
DATE SUBMITTED: . 10/24/84
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:
Copy Machine Leasejpurchase
;oV01-STED BY: R.B._Adams Chief of Police
c7TY ADMINISTRATOR: _ — -
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK:
INFORMATION SUtStdARY
A new copy machine is necessary for police department use, as present machine is
is are obsolete. •Down time of over '24 hours has occurred in the
outdated, and P�
past in order to obtain parts to fix machine.
See attached proposal for justification of recomT-_ndation.
t
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
lease/purchase of Xerox 1048 COPY machine with sorter.
Recoirmend approval of 3-year lease/p es, which
F•
ff ,total contract amount is $13,883.40pChineus 2useins Thistion breaksddawn into anrestimated
fits into amount month ed for copy
cost of $500 per
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
MEMORANDUM
TO; City Administrator
October 22, 1984
FROM; Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Copy Machine
Copier machine specifications were mailed to six companies:
i. Xerox
2. IBM
3. Ricoh
4. Kodak
5. Minolta
6. Sharp
Quotes were received back from five; Eastman Kodak indicated their machines
were too big for our use, and did not submit a bid. Ricoh, Minolta and Sharp
did not meet specifications. Canon machine does not meet our specifications,
either.
It should be noted that the present copy machine we have is now obsolete and
is no longer being made. In fact, there has been down time of over 24 hours
while parts were trying to be obtained to fix it.
RDC MMENDATON
3-year lease purchase plan of the Xerox 1048 machine with automatic 2-sided
copying and sorter, no automatic document feeder.
COSTS
Machine cost per month, including maintenance
(Base cost is $385.65 per month + .011 cents per copy over 5,000 copies)
(Based on 12,000 copies per month) $462.65
Supply costs per month, including: 54.24
developer 2 .001 per copy
dry imager @ .001 per copy
fuser @ .0001 per copy
paper @ .00242 per copy
(Based on 12,000 copies per month)
Total Cost: $516.89
$516.89 divided by 12,000 copies per month = .0430 cents per copy
Cost per copy based on 15,000 copies per month = .0367 cents per copy
Cost per copy based on 20,000 copies per month = .0320 cents per copy
One-Time Costs: Installation Charge: $114.00
Removal Charge: $130.00
There is no buy-out cost at end of lease purchase agreement under Xerox
Equipment Equity Plan (XEEP). Interest rate under this plan is 6.9%. Should
the City be unable to fund this lease for budgetary purposes there is no
penalty pay-off; Xerox just takes the machine back. Trade n value of at
least 20% of cost of machine is guaranteed should we own it, decide to
upgrade to a newer model.
JUSTIFICATION
Xerox has met the specialized needs of the police department for the past ten
years, and unless the market changes drastically, will continue to be only
ccuipany to do so. These needs specifically are:
1. automatic 2-sided copying (save on space as well as postage costs)
2. copies of fingerprints accepted by courts
3. copies of mug photos are of excellent copy quality
4. copies of composite drawings are of excellent copy quality
This machine also provides automatic collating, and since police reports
reuqire 4-5 copies each, and most reports have 3 to 4 pages each report, this
would be a tremendous time savings.
I recommend the lease purchase as opposed to the rental program, as it will
allow us to own machine, and still be cost effective for next 6 to 7 years.
Per year costs including supplies for 12,000 copies are broken down as
follows:
RENTAL COSTS PER YEAR LEASE COSTS PER YEAR
lst year: $5,753.28 1st year: $6,202.68
2nd year: $5,753.28 2nd year: $6,202.68
3rd year: $5,753.28 3rd year: $6,202.68
4th year: $5,753.28 4th year: $2,321.16
5th year: $5,753.28 5th year: $2,321.16
6th year: $5,753.28 6th year: $^_,321.16
7th year: $5,753.28 7th year: $2,321.16
$40,272.96 $27,892.68
Total Savings if Lease/Purchased and kept for at least 7 years: $12,380.28
The size of this machine fits into our present close quarters, yet machine and
features will adequately fulfill our needs in new facility, and should do so
for approximately the 7 years studied above.
Your consideration of this proposal is greatly appreciated.
R.B. Adams
( Chief of Police
/0 3
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Bob Jean, City Administrator October 24, 1984
FROM: Donna Corbet, Executive Secretary
SUBJECT: NON-STAFF RESOURCES/VOLUNTEERISM REPORT FOLLOW-UP
REQUEST BY COUNCILOR SCOTT
The Community Service (Volunteers) figures for each court are only
available for fiscal 84/85. Of the total hours for this year, the
County assigned 195 hours and Municipal Court assigned 54 hours.
Of the 5183.50 hours of volunteer staffing during 1983/84, the Police
Department accounts for 2,3411.5 hours; the Library accounts for 2,496
hours; and the City Hall accounts for 343 hours.
C During fiscal 84/85, the Police Department accounts for 586 hours;*
the Library for 525 hours and City hall for 100 hours.
* Note: The Police Department figure is estimated on last year's total.
This figure was not included in the report you received.
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARO, OREGON
October 22, 1984
TO: Bob Jean, City Administrator
FROM: Frank Currie, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: A.P.W.A. Annual Conference, Eugene, 'Qregon
(Response to Councilor Scott's Inquiry)
Jerry McNurlin and I attended the annual A.P.W.A. Conference in Eugene last
week.
I was in attendance Wednesday and Thursday morning. Jerry was in attendance
all day Thursday. Attached is the Conference registration for each of us.
The total for both is :105.00. I have charged the hotel room on the VISA, and
will turn in the mileage at the end of the month. Jerry had no room, and used
a City vehicle for transportation.
/ Of special interest was a tour of Eugene's nationally renowned bicycle path
system, and a seminar on computerized stream records. The bicycle path system
is primarily for commutors, but also serves recreational and juvenile needs,
which provided good insight to problems we may face in the future.
(FAC:br/0183S)
CITY OF TIFA RD
EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST
This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other
forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is
to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A
follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personnel file.
DATE OF REQUEST:Oct 5, 1984 Requested by: P.W. Operations
Vendor No. :
PAYABLE TO: APWA OREGON (IfAPILIt rAi,i. ".('. ( ) Employer request attend
Mail to Vonnie Rainwater ( ) Employer required attend
lane County Public Works For check run of —
3040 N. Delta Hwy ( ) Mail check
Eugene, Oregon 97401 - 1696 [ ) Notify dept. when ready
Vendor No. : Vendor No. :
PAYABLE TO: PAYABLE TO:
i ii i i ti ii i i ILII i i .............................................................
iiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Title of Program: APWA bREGON CHAPTER FALL CONFERENCE
Institution or organization APWA
Registration Deadline Oct 10, 1984 Training Dates From:10 17 84 To: 10/19/84
Describe the purpose:
C
Is this related to ( ) current position ( ) reasonable promotion or transfer?
Explain:
TRAINING COSTS: [ x) to be advanced ( ] to be reimbursed after attendance
Account No. Amount
Registration or tuition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-21200-625 $105 .00
Books.... . ....... .......... . .
. . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . ..
Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc. ). .. .
Lodging.. . .. ... . . ...... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Per Diem.. ....... . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other.
Total S
s 6 1 i i i i t i i i i I s h i i i i i i i i i i i C i L i C C i S C=S=------C C C!C---------------------------
Authorizations:
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiAuthorizations: I(employee) , understand and agree that if all conditions of
education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the
City for any expenditures made on my behalf.
Employee Signature: Date
Appropriation balance: $300.00 Manager: _ ( approved ( ( disapproved
Dept. Head: ( ) approved f ) d sapproved (explain) :
l
FInance I o t --
Checks should be made payablf
APWA OREGON CHAPTER FALL CONF
and mailed to: —
Vonnie Rainwater
OREGON CHA1'TEP APWA Lane County Public Works
3040 N. Delta Hwy.
1984 FALL CONFERENCE Eugene, OR 97401-1696
OCTOBER 17 , 18 & 19
EUGENE: , ()REGON
, i i
I)ELEGATEFrank A. (;urri- �R(,AN I /,A'i ! • )N City )f Tigard
ADDRESS F'.O. Box 2339; - F, s1 ATF Tigard, OR- )722 3
GUEST NAME ( i t at t end ing ) Sue Currie
PR_E_- REGISTRATION ( PRIOR TO OCTOBER 10 , 1984 1
PRICE PER EACH AMOUNT
3 DAY PRE-REGISTRATION ( DELEGATE ) $35 . 00__
3 DAY REGISTRATION ( DELEGATE) AFTER $45 . 00 $
OCTOBER 10 , 1984 -- - -
1 DAY REGISTRATION ( DELEGATE ) $20 . 00 S
GUEST REGISTRATION NONE
U`
THURSDAY LUNCHEON MEETING $ 1 ' 00 $�
THURSDAY BANQUET $14 . 00 $ _
FRIDAY BREAKFAST/BUSINESS MEETING $ 6 . 5(' S
FRIDAY AWARDS LUNCHEON $ 7 ' 00
SUBTOTAL
GUEST TOUR ON THURSDAY
$ 8 . 50 S
11. . 0(1 S
TICKETS FOR HULT CONCERT $
TOTAL
Full refund if cancellat ion is ma(ie, un oz txtut u� t ��►� 'r 1 (' , 1 `a ti•7 .
After this date, refund will be for meals only--registration tee
will be forfeited.
Enclosed are various colored pages det ai 1 ing sl)" to 1 t y P1 e l ems
f and tours on Wednesday afternoon , OCt oht-r 17th . 1 t you 1 l ,in ''i'
-Ittendi ng any of t hese• a(-t i vi t i.'s , p 1(ease' mai k t hr
page of your choice and return a (•opy along with thrs te'L.atstra
tion form.
Checks should be made payable to
APWA OREGON CHAPTER FALL- CONF .
and d to:
OREGON CHAY'f'F.R APWA Vonnie Rainwater
Lane County Public Works
1984 FALL CONFERENCE 3040 N. Delta Hwy.
OCTOBER 1 7 , 18 & 19 Eugene, OR 97401-1696
EUGENE, ()RF.GON
}•. H h. A 1
I>K1.EGAT1•; Jerome McNurlin k )LAGANI A'J I 1N
laity . t ti�;arl
ADDRESS
P.O. Box 23397 CITY b STA'L'E. Figar 1, of `) 1-' 3
_—_—_--_ -
GUEST NAME ( it at tending ) _--- _--- ---- ---
PRE-REGISTRATION ( PRIOR TO OCTOBER 10 , 1984 )
PRICE PER EACH AMOUNT
0 0
3 DAY PRE-REGISTRATION (DELEGATE ) $35 . 00
3 DAY REGISTRATION ( DELEGATE) AFTER $45 . 00 $
OCTOBER 10 , 1984 - - --
00 $
(� 1 DAY REGISTRATION ( DELEGATE ) $20 . --
GUEST REGISTRATION NONE
O�
THURSFAY LUNCHEON MEETING $ 7 . 00
0
THURSDAY BANQUET $14 . 00
FRIDAY BREAKFAST/BUSINESS MEETING $ 6 . 50
a
FRIDAY AWARDS LUNCHEON $ 7 . U0
SUBTOTAL
-IrEST TOUR ON THURSDAY $ 8 . 50
PICKETS FOR HULT CONCERT $ 11 ' 00
TO'T'AL (D 3
1, 11 refund if cancellation is maet(� >n or befork �)� t t 1 ri�•t .
Nt ter this date , refund will be for meals only--registi ,it iun t "'
X1' 111 be forfeited.
1 r� losed are various colored pages detailing spec i,► 1 t y P1 k'klr •rm
1 ours on Wednesday of ternoon, Oct oher 17t h. I t yon i f'
1111ding any of t hese act_ ivi t ies , p lc,asc` mark t ht• 1,
of your choice and return a copy along wi t h t
"rr form.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: October 29 1984 — AGENDA ITEM #: /0• 7
DATE SUBMITTED: October 24, 1984 .. PREVIOUS ACTION,. None
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: OREGON
BUSINESS nFVF1_OPMENT FUND APPLICATION PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan
OF HARDWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. _ REQUESTED BY: Jeff Wirkkala Pres. ,
Hardwood Industries_ Inc.
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: �.'` c!✓� ` , CITY ADMINISTRATOR: _
INFORMATION SUMMARY
In order that Hardwood Industries, Inc. may receive consideration fur a loan
under the Oregon Business Development Fund, a resolution in support of the
loan application must be passed by the City Council. A similar resolution was
passed by the Council in 1983, which resulted in a successful. loan for
Bank -Well Industries, Inc.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Approve or deny the resolution.
i
SUGGESTED ACTION
Council should pass the resolution in support of Hardwood Industries, Inc.
1' Application for a loan from the Oregon Business Development Fund.
(WAM:cz/0732P)
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF T I GARD, ORW'ON
TO: Jerri Widner, Finance Director/CitY Recorder
October 26, 1984
FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator
^TrR E'_'T:
Election Law Violation Complaint from Carolyn Eadon,
Chair, Right-To-Vote Committee.
one complaint from
At 2.00 p.m. , Friday, October 26, 1984, I received a ph ant election
Carolyn Eadon, Chair of the Right-To-VoteCommittee lasspring but y Right-To-
law violations. She alledged that sign
Vote Committee are being placed around Tigard. She further alleged that
of Mr. Ralph Furrer and Ms. Ima Scott.
the signs were in the possession
The Committee has not filed on Measure #S1 for this ne is1pla�nuthethe
Committee has not met and is not campaigning. Someone
signs and campaigning against #51, but it is not the Right-To-Vote Committee•
Carolyn Eadon said she had checked and no other persons had filed. She
wanted to know if the Committee or the City could take down the signs if
they are illegal.
' and Secretary of State's Office, then
Please confer with the City Attorney
take appropriate action.
CC: Mayor and Council
a f
Co-) CJ-,-AA utAll revlei,. ca b, C • O• P . )
CARDED rkJCLOGGED Case N��4
1 Date Day 2Time TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT QG Rpt' R RPt d ' � of3 Date Dayy 4 Time
OFFENSE REPORT Reference Case Nu7
r / -
5 offense/Case INVEST JUV.DEPT, O.A.DIST MAC 7 Accomp.Report B Clearance
ARREST ❑
CM CA.IMUNI. Com cater Custody ❑
EXCEPT ❑
Emorts Detail
SY-
6 Location ___. LED$ PER UNFOUND ❑
Other NCIC_worthless IJ REFERRED ❑
9 Victim's Name-Last-First-Middle I p . 10 Residence Address
�q�L✓G r�t �e r a 1 A ie"b or/ p'9 o s �J �. ,l, 77 J
11 Residence Phone 12 B siness Phone )3 Race to Sex 15 DO B.Age 16 Business,School Address
M I RP 117 Name-Last-First-middles 18 Residence Address
W.—T-1P--1 not n 1
19 Residence Phone 20 usiness Phone 21 Race 22 Sex 23 D B.,Age 24 B-ssiness.Si.ltuul Address
Z -- !✓ _ 4, -
fm
5 Name-Last-First-Middle
26 Residence Address
27 Residence Phone 28 Business Phone 29 Race 30 Sex 31 D.O.B.IAge 32 Business School Address
PERSONS
34 SURROUNDING -.--I RESIDENTIAL F, CRE
ADD
F,OTHER BUSINESS INSTITUTIONAL LSTED33CEOEILERE ❑ V _ INDUSTRIAUMFG. [' OPENSPACE YES C1NOATTOF VEHICLE O /ARKNAR
C NIA TYPE OF STRUCTURE 42 SUSPECT ACTIONS
36 Non-Residential Residential 40 METHOD OF 41 POINT OF ENTRY [-I I Indication Mult. r, 23 Took Victim's Veh. other It
ENTRY Suspects [1 24 Disabled Phone oother
❑ 1 ConiaN
nnce ❑1 Sgt.Family U NIA ❑ 2 Vandalized i s 25 Suspect Armed
❑ 2 Tavemlear Dwelling G t Attempt Only U 1 Unknown U 3 Ransacked ❑ 26 Shut Off Power
❑ 3 Restaurant ❑2 Apt. C 2 No Force U 2 Front U 4 Neal U 27 Bound/Gagged Victim Yet-.c e-
❑ 4 Fast Food ❑3 Condo C] 3 Key/Shp Cl 3 Rear O 5 smoked on Prem. E7 26 Used Demand Note e c•I S __
❑ 5 praglMedical ❑4 Duplew. f; 4 Bodily Force 'J 4 Side U 6 Ate/Drank on Prem C 29 Placed Property in
O 6Gas Station 1735 HoteUMotel (- 5 SaworiluBurn J 5 Gr.Lev. ❑ 7 Used Matches for Sack/Pocket
❑ 7 Retail Store 6 Other [: 6 Hid in Building C! 6 Up Lev. Light C 30 RippedrCut Clothing
❑ aSchool C 7 Channel Lock 11 7 Door 1 8 Alarm Disabled/ 31 Used Victim's Name
❑ 9Financial trot. - Ga Pipe Wench Ci S Window Bypassed ['. 32 Molested Victim ---
❑ 10Vehicle 39 TARGET(S) (.1 9 Tire Iron CJ 9 Sliding Glass 1 9 Knew Location of L' 33 Unusual Odorls)
❑ 11 Public Building -------
in
H 10 Bnck/Rock ❑10 DuctiVent Hidden Cash C7 34 Masturbated� -- -
❑ 12 Warehouse ❑ 1 Basement (� 11 Unit.Pry Bar E)11 Adj.Building ❑ 10 Selective in Loot U35 Struck Victim
❑ 131nduatrial U 2 Bedroom L' 12 Bolt Cuttersl EI Roof/FloorlSkylight Ci 11 Took TV/Stereo CI 36 Disrobed Fully
❑ 14 Office ❑ 3 DerdFamily Rm. Pliers C-1 13 Wall CI 12 Took Money 'i 37 Disrobed
U 15 Constmction n 4 Gar en rPE 13 Punch U 14 Garage F) 13 Took Jewelry Partially
W
❑ 16 Other C 14 Window Smash CI 15 Basement U 14 Used\ a Tool' C7 38 Blindfolded
❑ 6 Storage Area (.1 15 Tape/Wue U 16 TrunWHood LJ 15 Vehicle Needed to Victim
U 7 Kitchen C) 16 Screwdriver ❑17 Other Remove Properly U 39 Made Threats �4_4/INVESTIGATIONS
Q 37 TARGET(S) ❑ 8 Person U 17 Other - 1 Victim Contacted
18 Exit ❑ 18 Unoccupied Bldg. ❑ 40 Required Vicom
O ❑ 1 Cash Rag.lOrawer ❑9 Other ❑ 17 Occupied Bldg. C I to Act �K2 Suspect Contacted
C 2 OwnerlEmplWee -- _-- ❑ 18 Prepares Exit(s) F'. 41 HBD ❑ 3 Dusted for Latents
Ci3 Safe/Box U 19 Inflicted Injury ❑ 42 u16 ❑ 4 Tool Marks Noted
❑ 4 Vending Machine 43 SECURITY USED LJ 20 Forced Victim to ❑ 43 Demanded S Q 5 VehtcWSfwe Tracks
U 5 Display Items Move ❑ 44 Feed Weapon ❑ 6 Phowirnpression Taken
❑ 6 Storage Area ^ 1 None ❑ 6 trot.Lights ❑ 11 Security Fence ❑ 21 Used t ookout Driver C1 45 Stashed Loot ❑ 7 Scene Photographed
❑ 7 Customer ❑ 2 2 Bars Grates Q 7 Neighbor Wath ❑ 12 Guard ❑ 22 Threatened ❑ 46 Snatched Purse ❑ 8 Photos of Victim
❑ e anon ❑ 3 Eat.LgMs Q 8 Operation I D ❑ 13 Other Retaliation 47 Hideout Technique Q 9 Diagram of Scene
�L✓/� 1G� 4 Camera ❑ 9 Locked .. 4e Impersonated Other ❑ 10 AraChNeighbors Checked
❑ ❑ 11 Area Chocked
❑ 5 Dog C7 10 Alarm Q 12 Witnesses Contacted
45 ❑ 1 NONE ❑ 5 VEHICLE O 9 ORAL STATEMENT ❑ 13 BLOOD 4Z,17 PHYSICAL
EVIDENCE ❑ 2 FINGER PRINTS ❑ 6 PHOTOS (�j?-LO WRITTEN STATEMENT ❑ 14 BLOOD/ALC EVIDENCE
OBTAINED O 3 OTHER PRINTS ❑ 7 HAIR/FIBER ❑ 11 TAPED STATEMENT ❑ 15 RAPE KIT Ll 18 OTHE 4 -')WiJ J190S
❑ 4 WEAPON/TOOLS ❑ 8 STAINS ❑ 12 DOCUMENTS ❑ 16 CONTRABAND n 19 WITH WARRANT
NAME OR
46 ITEM#i/ARTICLE 47 CITY 48 I.D.NUMBERS 49 MA NDFA T EER 50 MO ELNUMBER 51 MISC.DESCRIPTION(Color,Size) 52 VALUE
e•
/ �' f caw../S .rfi� r�
/ a!%►rc�,I — /
d
-. - C rr Id !r R 4•r
D LgwN S,' O ,
S D
S D
SD
�. S 0
' O.R.S.162.373 SECTION 212 INITIATING A FALSE REPORT,(1)A PERSON COMMITS THE CRIME OF INITIATING A FALSE REPORT IF HE KNOWINGLY INITIATES TOTAL 53
TO A FIRE DEPARTMENT,LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OR OTHER ORGANIZATION THAT DEALS LOSS
WITH EMERGENCIES INVOLVING DANGER TO LIFE OR PROPERTY.(2)INITIATING A FALSE REPORT IS A CLASS C MISDEMEANOR. VALUE G_�,-
U I UNDERSTAND THAT 1 LIABLE FOR All TOWING AND STORAGE 1 DO NOT WANT THE SUSPECT ARRESTED C f
POSTS INCURRED DURING
THE RECOVERY OF THIS VEHICLE. CRIME.
LMTESTIFY AS A WITNESS AGAINST THE DEFENDANT WHEN CHARGED WITH ADDTL 54
A RUNAWAY ) PROPERTY
C3 THE NAMED CHILD IS PRESENTLY (OUT OF MY CONTROL)AND 1 LISTED
REOLIEST THAT HEISHE BE TAKEN INTO CUSTODY FOR THEIR OWN SIGNATURE OF PERSON R H—E INCIDENT YES U NO
PROTECTION.
55 Reporting / B.P.S.T. 56 St1ik 57 D st. 58 Grid 59 Status 60 A at
Officers► / ' r//. / N 1�
Case Number Reference Case Number Pg Z 0f U
TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFENSE REPORT s 7
61 Suspect No.1 Name—Last Irst—Middle 62 Race 63 Sex 64 Age 65 Date of Birth 66 Ht 67 Wt. 6� it 69 Eyes 70 Build
�/ S o/ro>r �arIQSI� 70 II.1 ", , 71
71 Nicknam AKA 7 OLN/State 73 SSN 74 Suspect's Address 75 Phone 76 S.I_D.No.
3 1Si[ Syy-v�-lrzs 99� SUS /�!JJJ�sr r,,,► �ao-rs77
77 Suspect No.2 Name—Last—First—Middle 78 Race 79 Sex 80 Ayn 81 D e of Birth 82 t. 83 Wt. 84 Hair 85 Eyes 86 B
87 Nickname/AKA 88 OLN/State 89 SSN 90 Suspect's Address 91 Phone 92 S.I.D.No.
93 HAIR 94 HAIR STYLE 95 FACIAL HAIR 96 COMPLEXION10,
7 GEN APPEAR 98 DEMEANOR 99 SPEECH 100 VOICE
LGTHRYPE 1 2 SUSPLCI - 1 2 SUSPECT 1 ? 1 2 SUSPECT
iSPEC1 ? SUSPECT l 2 SUSPECT 1 2 SUSPECT
1 2 SUSPECT CI f] OlJnk
sed
❑ ❑ 0 Unk. O ❑ 0 Unk ❑ U 0 Unk. ❑ C' 0 Unk ❑ 0 Unk ❑ ❑ 0 Unk ❑ v 1 Accent O O 0 Unk
❑ ❑ 1 Bald O O 1 AlrorNat ❑ ❑ 1 Clean Shave U 1J 1 Acre ❑ 1 Consery ❑ f] 1 Angry O C] 2 Lisps O ❑ 1 HighDisgitc
❑ ❑ 2B= O U 2 Full Beard f7 ❑ 2 Dark t 1 2 Dirty ❑ 13 2 Apologetic ❑ ❑ 3 Mumbles O ❑ 2 High Pitch
)<],❑ 2 Receding ❑ O 3 Bushy U U 3 Fu Manchu U ❑ 3 Freckled ❑ I. 3 Disguise ❑ CJ 3 Calm C] O 4Offensive ❑ O 3 Loud
f$( O 3 Short - n 1 G...as� n M e r:,,atae -f3�Ll 4 Light ❑ [7 4 Flashy ❑ U 4 Disorg Ei U 5Ou� ❑ ❑ 4 Low Pitch
Q- O-4 Collor ❑ ❑ 5 minury, O ❑ 5 Lower L ip a :.1 '":^ rl 1 5 Gd Lookirw r'1 I 1 5Irrational ,-, g —U 5 Medium
0 5�%� ❑ O a Ponytail ❑ ❑ 6 Mustache CJ U 6 Pale T ❑ i 1 6 Miliary e3 U 6 Nervous ❑ U e e9unui�a
O O 8 Lang A"T %Normal
❑ O 7 Processed ❑ ❑ 7 Fuzz ❑ ❑ 7 Pocked ❑ C_I 7 Unkempt O U 7 Polite ❑ ❑ a Slow ❑ ❑ 7 Nasal
❑ O 6 Straight ❑ O P Side Bums O Ll 8 Ruddy ❑ f i fl Unueual Odor ❑ U B Protesting CJ r] 9 Stutter. ❑ ❑ 0 Pleasant
❑ 9 Fly ❑ O e Unshaven ❑ Cl 9 Tanned .F_I J 9 Well Groomed U ❑ 9 Stupor U (A tO Talkative 10
O 9 Raspy
O O 1 c ww ❑ 10 V I ❑ O 10 Other ❑ ❑ 10 Other ❑ U 10 Other L7 O 10 Violent ❑ U 11 Slurred ❑ 11 soft
[3.-2Fkr - O ❑11l}evrcut .. .... - ❑ ❑ 11 Other
❑ p 120WW LI O 1/01he�
❑ 3 Thick ❑ ❑ 12 Other -
O 4 Thinning
d-O SWIVY
❑ M
❑ 60tr r-- __ — -
101 RIGHT/LEFT 102 SUSPECT WORE 103 WEAPON NIA 104❑TATTOO ❑SCAR
HANDED i ECT 2 SUSPECT 1 2 SUSPECT
1 2 SUSPECT i 2
1 2 sutsm7 ❑0 Unk O 0 Unk - --- 0 1 Handgun
O ,00 0 Unk • .- - O ❑ 2 Shotgun O 0 Unk O ❑
g ❑1 Ski Maak O 1 Ski Mask_
❑ 1 Right ❑ ❑ 3 Rifle
O O 2 Left O 2 Stocking Mask C 2 Stocking Mask " .__ O ❑ 4 Simulated Gun ❑ ❑ 1 Extremity ❑ ❑
U 0 5 Toy Gun O ❑2 Body O O
O 3 CapfHal __ ❑ ❑ 6 Other/Unk Gun
105 FACE ❑3 — � ------" - ❑ O 7 Pocket Knife ❑ ❑3 Face O O
1 2 SUSPECT ❑4 CoaUJacket ,N O 4 Cost/Jacket ❑ C 8 Belt Knife
❑ ❑0 Unk ❑5 Shirt ___ ___ _ ❑ ❑ 9 SlianOtheCutting Inst p ❑4 Pictures O D
❑S SMA ❑ ❑ 10 Suangubtion
O O 1 Squares _. U O 11 HandefFeetiBody Force U ❑5 NamaMitWs O ❑
�� 11l.G� O 6 pants
❑ ❑2 High O 6 Pants - U O 12 Blackjack/Club
/ n O
❑ O 3 Long
Cheekbone O 7 Stores `l o ❑ O 8 Other/r/ /'O%.t s 1 ❑7 Shoes ----- ❑ U 13 Other —
O 4 Broad ❑8 Glows __ ❑8 Gloves _--
❑ ❑5TMn
❑ O 6 pound O 9 Glasses - ❑9 Glasses ---_- —
❑ O 7 oval O 10 Other
CY '❑B 1 D Kit ❑100"W
-
106 VEHICLE 107 Vin.No. 108 Value at Time of Loss 109 Roc.Val.
A.
STATUS SJJ.^�. � ye �a1 YY
VEHICLE 110 .Number 1S1t1 Lc. Year ic.�S 11 vclr. Yeape r 7 11i'pro�Make fs rSaO 11 117 la irAry-Lairs+
INFORMATION _ y08 4/C 3 - �J
120 Griveabb
119 Other Vehicle Descriptors ,. YES 0 NO❑
b CANu
121 Peivriiasion Use 122 Dehq.Payrtwtts 23 Theft Ins. 124 Body Damage 125 Keys to Vehtcb 126 VaWabbs 127 Spec.Equip 128 Spare b Jack
YES O NO O YES O NO O YES❑ NO❑ VES❑ NO❑ YES❑ NO❑ YES❑ NO❑ YES❑ NO C YS❑ NO O
129 Owner 131 Phone
Sus0 a-
132 Towed To 133 Towed By 134 Reason �13550t.No. 136 HOLD 137 Reason
VES❑ NO❑ YES❑ NO❑
138 CASE MANAGEMENT YES NO Suspect Arrested❑ CRIME PREVENTION INFORMATION
1.Is there a major Injury/raps Involved ❑ 139 Additional 141 1.Completed 2 Needs to be completed
Suspects COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
2 Is ttlero a known witness to offense ❑ outstanding 1 2 1 2
3 Can suspect be described ❑ Yes ❑ a Anti-shop Lift Cl a Neighborhood Watch ❑ ❑
4 Can suspect be Identified - J!r ❑ No 19, b.ChlecklCredit Card ❑ b.Property I D ❑ ❑
5 Can suspect vehicle be Identified ❑ 140 Needs c.Intemal Security ❑ c.Security Survey ❑ ❑
8 Can stolen property be Identified-- 13 Immediate d.Physical Security ❑ PERSONAL
7 Is there physical evidence S2" 0 Follow-Up a At Home✓ 1 2
_ t9 _ ❑ ❑
re
8 Is thean M.O.present _. _ X ❑ Yes b.Away from Home ❑ ❑
g Laads available for clearance f� ❑ Lwo ❑
NARRATIVE: 4 1/ -
A
N O
r4 r4 H
N
N
N h7
� N
a >4
� N �
N
I F•I
N O� r4 N e+f N Z
a s
e xNA
U N y
y �ey2 N
X .W N 41 R1 �1 r, N N C
U b . V V N 0
e m o � m oo° " > o a
N �.
ca Le
rl Ps yy W co
ed
� N VAI O
H V �t � N V R• ` it � ..�.1 C09
V N �f ^ V 09 f� K r- U
ON .+Jt T4 41 N .�Y N 4
� 4a ^ 1
I e r" V r1 Ln
ft
wCd
N W o
.a ..
W -+ '+ -+ �4 AJx
x
N tAr1 R! V eA.1
01%
N v
.d
04
� ^ Vcn
r► � ^ U v Cr � s
~W V 7+ � � C9 inp
�1 pp gg
On
�WrA+ o
�C � tA�1 � eA•'1 � O
� * � 0 4c1+ in a.
Y1
1.4 N N 1a1 Po W O
tVs A V .•1 U H V 44
A O .-1 M C •�+ O
L 0v .a O
V -4 A O+ J V H U
" Le
~� awes° m a4) P. 9m ma <
o
L. .a o � 0 .4 o a. 0 ..1 x o
.,� C z t+ e�f G e+1 A T So y V o
K V * � J � IW1. � �C r` p. �( .o V SIM r4 tn Q. � t
4 N i+ 4 � r4
a C a
a
* * ..