City Council Packet - 05/21/1984 BE M
e TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an
�f SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the;appropriate
MAY 21, 1984, 7:30 P.M. sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available,
cc E FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start
10865 SW WALNUTof that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items'
H
TIGARD, OREGON 97223 are asked to be kept to 2 minutes or less; longer
[+ cam matters can be set for a future Agenda by con-
tacting either the Mayor or City Administrator.
7:30 1. SPECIAL MEETING:
1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
00
1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 41
7:35 2. CANVASS ELECTION RESULTS (If Available) & ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE FOR
MAYOR AND ,COUNCILOR POSITION #2
7:40 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please)
7:45 4. TRAVELER III —WASHINGTON COUNTY PROGRAM
o City 'Administrator/Lucille Warren -
8:00 5. TEMPORARY USE PERMIT TU 6-84 - GENERAL TELEPHONE - NPO #1
A request' for a temporary, use permit to continue to allow a mobile
office at 8838 SW Burnham Street (Wash. County Tax"Map `2Si 2B,' Lot 100).
o Public Hearing Opened
o Summation by Planning Staff
o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
o Recommendation of Planning Staff
o Council Discussion
o Public Hearing Closed
o Council Action
8:15 6. LEGAL ISSUES FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS
o Legal Counsel
9:15 7• CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. anyone may request
that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
7.1 Receive and File Departmental Monthly Reports
7.2 Approve OLCC Application, Webfoot Deli, 13815 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard
RMS Application
7.3 Award Bid For 68th Sewer LID E
7.4 Deny Creation Of Train Whistle Free Zone f
7.5 Receive and File Status Report On Car Arson Incident
7.6 Approve NPO Appointments
9:20 8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff
9:30 9. ADJOURNMENT
1559A €_
r
COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 21, 1984 - PAGE i
t,
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
i
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE
Notice is hereby given that a special Council meeting, called by the Mayor pro
tem with the`common consent of the Council, will be held ;on May 21, 1984, at
7:30 P.M., in Fowler Junior High School, lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut Street,
Tigard, Oregon. The meeting is called for the purpose of considering the 4
following items:
i
t
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT - 'TU 6-84 - GENERAL TELEPHONE - NFO Irl - PUBLIC
HEARING E
TRAVELER III - WASHINGTON COUNTY PROGRAM ' 4
I �
` LEGAL ISSUES FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS
Receive and File Departmental Monthly Reports
Approve OLCC Application, Webfoot Deli, 13815 SW Pacific
Hwy, Tigard
RMB Application
Award Bid For 68th Sewer LID
Deny Creation Of Train Whistle Free Zone
Receive and File Status Report On Car Arson Incident
Approve NPO Appointments
Canvass Vote From 5/15/84 Election +& Administer Oath of Office for Mayor
and Councilor Position #2 �
And Other Business As Deemed Necessary By The Council Under Non-Agenda
Items
1
Kenneth Scheckla, Mayor pro tem .
lw/1568A
8
---a 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 ---
T I G A R D CI T Y C 0 U N C L
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - May, 21, 1984 - `7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor pro tem Kenneth Scheckla; Councilors: Tom
Brian, and Ima Scott; City Staff: Bob Jean, City
Administrator; Liz Newton, Associate Planner (left at 8:33
P.M.); Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Deputy
City Recorder.
2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS
a.: City Administrator stated that agenda item x#7.3 should be amended
to show 'all'`bids be rejected and readvertised.
City Administrator requested item #8.1 be consideration of -a
letter of agreement with TMEA/OPEU regarding the study of, a
wellness program. #8.2 is for 'Council vacation scheduling.
b.' Mayor pro tem Scheckla asked if Mayor elect Cook and Councilor
elect Edin were getting full Council packets.
3
City Administrator stated they were getting all information
supplied: to 'Council except for confidential Executive Session
information pursuant to Council request.
c. Councilor Scott requested that item #8.3 be discussion on timing
_w of Civic Center Appointments.
d. Councilor Scott requested a report from Director of Public Works
on Wednesday evening regarding an update on the light at
Canterbury. Also a report from Director of Planning & Development
regarding Economic Development Report which he said would be
available.
3. CANVASS ELECTION RESULTS (If Available) & ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE FOR
MAYOR AND COUNCILOR POSITION #2
a. City Administrator stated this information would not be available
until May 23, 1984.
4. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS
a. John Cook, Mayor elect, requested Council call a special meeting
with the Council and City-wide Board and Committee Chairmen to
evaluate cutbacks and priorities for next year.
b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to call
special Council meeting for June 4, 1984 at 7:30 P.M. at Fowler
Junior High School.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 21, 1984
C. Geraldine Ball,
representing herself and DJB,; Inc. , discussed her
concerns bids. She
on 68th Parkway LID #42 and the rejection of concerns
and
i `submitted a letter for the refaced rd outlining
69th and include more
suggested that the line be p
:properties...
have
ctor of Public
City ,Administrator stated
that
be g daddressinge these concerns
Works' respond to Mr May 23, 1984
and he will also report to Council Wednesday evening, Y
Discussion followed regarding the bid rejection process.
5• TRAVELER III - WASHINGTON COUNTY PROGRAM
on
a. Ron Sillett, Washington County, presented a slide presentation
theCountyand their programs. t
q of the script' from the
City Administrator re uested a copy`
lett stated this could be provided.
presentation. Mr. Sil
reciation for the presentation.
b. Council expressed their app t
6• TEMPORARY USE PERMIT TU 6-84 - .GENERAL TELEPHONE: - NPO #1 a mobile
` use permit to ,continue to allow
A requestfor a temporary Lot 100)-
office at 8838 SW Burnham Street (Wash: County Tax Map 2S1 2B,
a. Public Hearing Opened
t b. Associate Planner Newton synopsized history and noted that GTE is
ee Community
requesting approval for 18 months. She of aatemporaryuseosl
Development Code only allows app
year.
C. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak.
d• Associate Planner Newton recommended approval for 1 year.
e. Public Hearing Closed
f, Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve
the temporary use for Z year according to TMC Section 18.140.020
(C)(1) with the possibility of a 1 year renewal.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
ASSOCIATE PLANNER NEWTON LEFT: 8:33 P.M.
7, LEGAL ISSUES FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS
a• Legal Counsel Adrianne Brockman discussed liability issues with
ility and
Council. Tort liability, Section 1983 of the USC Sheab cautioned
anti-trust liability were discussed briefly.
Council that action taken tleave side �t em vulnerableheir scope of duties,
suit
t staff has been trained
or away
from a Council meeting, could
b. City Administrator stated that managemen
by Ms. Brockman in these areas also•
Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 21, 1984
the amount of risk the
NPO's take,
did not know the answer since there is
C. Discussion followed as to
Legal Counsel stated they however, if the meetings are not called
no case 'law on this point,
properly there could be risk of suit-
Administrator
suggested that the definitionof
the
name
Cityinsured could be
d. It was gg not cost much for
broadened a4 ort back on 6/11/84 with the current insuranc
stated he would rep
information. an
Legal Counsel come back theto have NFO
e. Consensus Of; Chen number of hours Lanwasd cost to research
estimate of
coverage with the City-
liability and
j
8.
RECEIVE AND FILE DEPARTMENTAL MONTHLY REPORTS Councilor Scott to receive
a.
Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by s
and file.
Approved by
unanimous vote of Council present.
WEBFOOT DELI, 13815 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY,
9, APPROVE OLCC APPLICATION t
4
TIGARD, Rt4B APPLICATION approve.
MCouncilor Scott to
a,
otion by Councilor Brian, seconded by i
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. { -
i
1p, REJECT ALL BIDS FOR 68TH SEWER LID
seconded by Councilor Scott to re]the r
Motion by Councilor Brian, o€ the intention of bid '.
a. misunderstanding for a
all bids because of a and readvertise
alternate bid for rock excavation
opening on June 1, 1984-
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
CREATION OF TRAIN WHISTLE FREE ZONE
11. DENY Scott to deny
a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor
creation-
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
12, RECEIVE APID FILE STATUS REPORT ON CAR ARSON INCIDENT ed to show that the
Councilor Scott requested the report be Chang
parked in Councilor. Brian's driveway but in front of
a, of the
car was net P She also questioned the status Fire
City Administrator reported the
his home on the street- Councilor Scott will
arson investigation.
District is conducting the investigation-
contact them for further information.
y
COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 21, 1984
page 3 � .�
x
13. : APPROVE NPO APPOINTMENTS
Emmett Whitaker, 13250 SW Burnham St. NPO # 1
Floyd Bergmann, 11600 SW 90th Ave. NPO # 2
Roger Maddox, 11555 SW '88th, Apt. # 48 NPO fir` 2
Mark Padgett, `11270 ,SW 95th NPO # 2
Duane Ehr, 10425 SW Park Street'NPO'#-3
Ralph L. 'Flowers, 11700 SW Gaarde St. NPO # 3
William Shenk, 15685 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, # 55 NPO 5
Sue Carver, 10155 SW Hoodview'NPO # 6
Mary Clinton, 9865 SW View Court NPO '# 6
Bruce Rodgers, 10305 SW Serena Way NPO # 6
Connie Smith, 8860 SW Scheckla',Dr. NPO # 6
Mr. Murel Gillen, recently appointed to NPO# 6, have his membership
switched to NPO # 2, the location of his new address.
a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
14. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff
14.1 TMEA/OPEU LETTER OF AGREEMENT - WELLNESS PROGRAM 'STUDY
a. Lengthy discussion was heard regarding the agreement. Councilor
Scott opposed the agreement and noted the cost as a factor and ,
requested: it be considered in 'Executive Session at the 5/23/84
Budget Committee Meeting.
b. Councilor Brian felt the wellness program's goal would be to
reduce claims against the insurance, thereby reducing the cost of
the benefits package in the future. He continued to comment that
with the reduced dollar amount being set aside by the City and the
fact that arbitration would be extremely costly, he supported the
agreement.
E'
E
C. Mayor pro tem Scheckla stated that Council still retains the right
to opt out of the program if the proposal does not meet Council's
concerns .
d. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Mayor pro tem Scheckla to
authorize the City Administrator- and Mayor pro tem to sign
agreement.
Approved by 2-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott °
voting nay.
14.2 COUNCIL VACATION SCHEDULING
a. Council advised Administrator of their scheduled vacations to
assist with setting agendas through the summer months.
Page 4 COUNCIL'MINUTES - MAY 21, 1984
14.3 CIVIC CENTER APPOINTMENTS
a.; Consensus of Council was to cut off acceptance of applications for
the Civic Center Committee ;appointments on May 25, 1984. The
appointments will .be made"June;4, 1984.
Councilor Scott reminded ;i Council these appointments must be made
by unanimous vote of Council.
15 ADJOURNMENT: 10:O1 P.M.
eputy'`City Recorder - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
Lam' —City of Tigard
(lw/1594A) _
Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES' - MAX 21, 198
`
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPAPPY Legal 7-6473
P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684.0360 Notice
BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075
f Legal Notice Advertising
F1
r p:
0 ® ❑ Tearsheet Notice
City of Tigard '
Q PO Box 23397 ® ❑ Duplicate Affidavit R�?
Tigard, OR 97223
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON, )ss
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )S'-
` 1- Susan Plnkley
being first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Advertising
Director, or his principal cleric, of the—T Time,,;
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.02.0;published at_` Tigard in the
aforesaid county and state;that the
Sc 1 ertad_Agenda,Ttem —
a printed copy of which is hareto annexed,was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for 1 successive and
consecutive in the following issues`.
May 17 198
/ 8, 1984
Subscribed an �yorn to before me thi q �l
r Notary Public for Oregon
My Commission Exp'st 3/16/87
AFFIDAVIT
r •—.t ? �',, e '" r'+t�£ea.hrr y`�t``� 3?,� ff .� t -f +t E
Y
t tzr 4a�lIaarat�g` eFacYet4 F eu .tt&z*3 ate.pub>"646 xor yacs°tn�t�rsr atacsta
aer$P3cz mtttlos srsdt �da way l :ulratct fz o tl:a€itj�Reid r:'f
Y27t� SW,Lilt @rkl#'iLappl992}i5�t�yyl�@d@go
gg»3 ye�#{3,T�yGyre�iyyl7Yi 1e?�'C3l�f3r $l
n,.
t z
'ts L'1u.
TIMES LI ICOMPANY Legal 7-6456
P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)664-0360Notice
BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075
t
Legal Notice Advertising
a City of Tigard a ® Tearsheet Notice
'
a PO Sox 23397 a ® Duplicate Affidavit
_ Tigard, OR 97223
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON, )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss.
1, Susan Pinkley
being first'duly sworn, depose and say that I am jh�Advertising
Director,or his principal clerk,of the igar zmes _
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in,ORS 193.010
and 193.020;published at Tigard in the
aforesaid county and state;that the
P"I'l-i C Hearri n8`Ntzt—e -
a printed copy of which is hereto'annexed,was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for 1 successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
May 10 198E
f 1
Subscribed and n to before me this 1/,91984 _
Notary Public for Oregon
My Commission Expi 3f 16/87
AFFIDAVIT
Wg
fu '#.a43= m - .3A °c`
E �t
WWIF�� ��j 4v 33dE yk�ny�n'dWw'VJ� r�4y�bLdS'Yf�i ��0.a�-S�i�it.�r�.tiSW�6II1 Y `3
.f $33 €! 3MP ct t t$t Cir
' toff a2 ZE7�srj f �iabo 5$£ 12 *&S 3 tai>cn4%
DATE
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
i the following item: (Please print the information)
Item Description: 'tLs - ��, , t,� �,A �Q
Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue)
Mame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
O F TIFARD
.
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
s
I
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE
Notice is hereby given that a special Council meeting, called by the Mayor pro:
tem with the common consent of the Council,;will be held on,May 21, 1984, at
7:30 P.M. , in Fowler Junior High School, Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut Street,
Tigard, Oregon. The meeting is called for the purpose of considering the s
following items
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT - TU 6-84 GENERAL TELEPHONE - NPO #1 - PUBLIC
HEARING
TRAVELER III -'WASHINGTON COUNTY PROGRAM
LEGAL ISSUES FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS
Receive and File Departmental Monthly Reports
Approve OLCC Application, Webfoot Deli, 13815 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard
RMB Application +
Award Bid For 68th Sewer LID ;
C
Deny Creation Of Train Whistle Free Zone
Receive and File Status Report On Car Arson Incident
Approve NPO Appointments
Canvass Vote From 5/15/84 Election & Administer Oath of Office for Mayor
and Councilor Position #2
And Other Business As Deemed Necessary By The Council Under Non-Agenda
Items
Kenneth Scheckla, Mayor pro tem �
lw/1568A
;i
r
12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4271 �
I
MEMO
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MAY 21, 1984 ,E
VISITOR'S AGFA
My Mayor and Members of the Council
v My name is Geraldine Ball and I am representing DJB,' Inc.';and myself personally.
I want to talk toyou regarding 68th Parkway L.I.D. #42. It is my understauding
that due to the teehnAcality' on the part of the City of asking for rock removal
cost on the basis of lineal feet instead of cubic feet and the fact that the
low bidder neglected to include part of his labor cost - this L.I.D. #42 is
again being advertised and it is necessary for everyone interested to submit
new;bids.
It is too bad that this is necessary because besides the low bidder who forgot
part of his labor costs there were other bids which would have been acceptable.
Now because of this delay the Oregon Dept, of Transportation plans to have
the Contractor complete the road:with the exception of the final asphalt and
then the City of Tigard will come along and tear up the road to install the
sewer.
I wonder if any thought was given to another means of completing the sewer
connections. DJB, Inc. property is within a'few hundred feet of the Main
Trunk that serves All State Insurance. It adjoins Tax Lot 5700, Map`2 S 1 '1 AA,
owned by Wardin which was not included in L.I.D. #42 and _does not have a sewer
connection at this time. It is apparent that the plan in to connect this with
the All State Insurance connection - so why not continue north and take in the
property up to the interchange that is to go East and West.
On the north side of the Interchange there could be a connection with the Sewer
that serves OEA.
By doing this you would avoid the Interchange and most of the rocks or boulders
and would certainly be a savings of money to those involved.
Several people in the know said them suggestion would be to put the sewer on
69th which is much lower - but from what I have heard this isn't possible because
the 69th road is in the County. Does this mean that the Dartmouth.Extension
Sewer L.I.D. and road L.I.D. cannot be completed because some of that property
also adjoins S. W. 69th. If L.I.D. # 42 can't go in on 69th because 69th Avenue
is in the County - then I would assume the same would apply to L.I.D. #40. L.I.D.
#40 is on the West aide of 69th and if #42 were allowed to go on 69th it would be
on the East side.
I hope the Council will look into this matter and decide to do what is best for
everyone involved.
Please make this part of the City of Tigard record of Item 7.3 of tonight's consent
agenda and the L.I.D. r#42 record.
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
i
f:
TO: Mayor pro tem and City Council
May 16, 1984 }
t
FROM: Loreen Wilson, Deputy Recorder
t
SUBJECT: May 21, 1984 Agenda information
Please note that this agenda item will be verbal. No information is supplied
F
in the packet.
lw/1571A
t
r
WASHINGTON COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING — 150 N. FIRST AVENUE
HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DEPT,OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION
Planning Division
WES MYLLENBECK,Chairman 2nd Floor
BONNIE L.HAYS,Vice Chairman "15031648.8761
EVA M.KILLPACK
JOHN E. MEEK May 22, 1984
LUCILLE WARREN y
Bob Jean
City Administrator
City of Tigard
P.O. Box 23397`
Tigard, OR 97223
Enclosed is the material you requested pertaining to
the Traveler III script.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call
me``at 640-3592.
Ron Silfett
Engineering Technician
RS:stb
Enclosure
an equal opportunity employer
6Dashingtan County
Traveler III . v
�A_
April 10, 1984' b
Second Draft
CnRACTER `oICE
I grew up on a €arm just south of Hillsboro. Went
to college in Forest Groare...now I live in a condo to
Beaverton and work as a Systems Engineer at Tektronix.
My father still farms that land. The place looks just
like it did when I was a kid...that's one of the things
I like about living here in Washington county—the old
and the new, existing side by side.
NARRATOR
Washington Connty...founded in 1843...fifteen years
before the State of Oregon.
The County embraces 730 square miles of valley land...
nestled between the city of Portland to the east and the
coastal mountains to the west. The healthy agricultural
and wood products trades which exist today are a heritage
b:
borne of the County's cultural and economic dependence
on farming and forestry since it was first settled.
Page 2
t„
The challenges to County government in those 'ear1y'days
were mild by today's standards. Beginning in the 1950s,
population increases and a changing business environment
began to alter the manner in which County affairs were
managed.
Growth in business and growth in population came hand-
in-hand.
and-inhand. With growth came the need for homes, nese
roads, new sewers, and increased levels of police,
public health and other4�"v i e
5 in 1962, the people of Washington County decided to manage
their own growth and became a "Home Rule" county,
virtually independent of state management over its intern
affairs. Now, the people who live here decide how local
government will be organized, what functions it must
perform, and what services it will provide.
CHARACTER VOICE �
it's a new county now. I've watched the incredible
pace of growth here really put county government through
its paces.
Oh, sure...the farmlands and the forests are still dere..
( but now, well...look around. There's a lot more now.
�.. ,
We're fast becoming a center of high technology
too!
industry,
_ _ r
Page 3
6
f`
Tektronix, the state's largest employer...Intel, a
{
giant in the electronics industry..•Floating Point
tr w
ost of smaller, 'agressive electroni
Systems, and a hcs
oriented companies. And of course, there°s Nike's
world headquarters right here in Beaverton.; We're
}
diversified now...less vulnerable to sudden indu"stry
and economic fluctuations.
You know, when you think about it, there's a good reason
for all these changes. A' reason why we°vebeen the
fastest growing county in the st to for nearly three
A decades now.. Why businesSA drawn here—and why
the $ farmer andlcimber operator still prosper. s
simple: of life. For everyone.
That re son-16 p : qu
For families...for big business and small business.
t
Its the County' s job to help maintain that quality 4„
of life...for everyone.
NARRATOR .
The unprecedented growth experienced by Washington
County from 1960 through 1980 demanded immediate,aftP
often -crisis management" attention.
s
Page 4
d
f 3
What had begun as a network of dirt roads connecting
farms with*local markets had gradually evolved...paving
uponpaving...into thoroughfares for thousands of
modern cars, trucks and buses. Constructed on a
i
piecemeal`basis, without proper structural foundation t
l and je-c� drainage considerations, this patchwork road e
j
k
system began to literally crumble beneath the wheels of e 1
s
progress.
Then in 1969, Senate i131 required Oregon counties to
plan for the utilization of land, and later, in 1973,
Senate Bill 100 extended; the same requirements to the
cities of the s2re�c
A that point, Washington County
and its cities mmitted to the preservation of
farm and forest lands and to the preservation of the
unique character of local neighborhoods.
The County's recently l
adopted coeprabausiva eae.o Plans non elimivase tat st But there is a
&n and developaeot. Future
doubts -0-Ca--Ia9r3s cnauted...si.11tona of aollara lre-"•..a cost which can be partially measured in taxpayer:
11.®ability -- s.
now be levastad:aitb tba caztaiaty shicb Cassa frsa
support for government's efforts to pian for orderly
ratl..aaai, —dtsble land uam Plesal.4_
9anafits from tbmaa Programa
are already w!&a�xn t� growth while simultaneously preserving a way of life
Coanty. •.®ceordir4 to'S=s_j d�Wttaxtbl !ally ane-tlrlsd aQ
which attracted that- growth in the first place.
Oregon's irovtb ie ocCarixig right bare is Washington ..
County. Nineteen of the ante's SG toP developuend
Projects are eadersrp hem- • W,� JJl mow .
' 17
ILSaaD iD&Strial.davelopetatA frau /
Yaalatie, to Basesrtaa, to eba Sunaei easridor, to J ./
(
�aro�is integ rated, aid -bT-side. vi ib cleae,
ties.
attract!.® real&Utlal coasvai ���I�.� �JA�✓!7'ob,s^sa y�„'►T� �,
,
'
E'
1
g.
CHARACTER VOICE
There's nothing to indicate •that the growth we've
seen over the last quarter century will suddenly i
stop. Actually, our rate of growth is expected to
continue.'..and the larger and more complex our culture
and economy becomes, .the more challenges we will f ace.
�l
F'ortunately, •the new management-structure in the County
_ f
has already achieved measureable success. But I ask
myself sometimes...
Can the county really continue to serve all
the people who live here?
Are people living in our cities paying an "urban
subsidy?-' Are their tax dollars retuning to them the
same benefits Xtheir.rural neighbors enjoy for the
Asame tax dollars? r.
Just what services should the county provide?
And tb whom should it extend these services?
e
_ F=
� a
Starting with adoption iu 1962 of its "Home Rule"
charter, the County began experimentingwith a number
Qgov� nance designs®
.¢%••gar,...
was amen
rd
to
A ij-6en in x.980; .
rd of five County
Commissioners,
provide foraa Boa
one of whom is elected at—large and serves as chairman,
and four others elected.-from districts. That same
amendment also provided for an elected County Auditor,
who routinely monitors the -effectiveness--and cost--
of County rog
ams. This evolving governanice design
el: �^ the County to
f has nowimatured, ti►us positioning
bestjf-i� the needs of its citizens today
-
Under the present charter framework. policy decisions
i of the Board of Commissioners.
are the responsibility
o those policies is the responsibility
,`4nplemantation of
�
of the County Administrato ho is appointed byand
a
serves at the pleasure of the Board. Thi S structure is
similar to thae` which exists today in most Oregon cities,
�/ school districts and$kcorporati®nsa .
Page X 7.
L.
NARPLATOR
Most .recently, the County°s managementefforts have
awl
s centralizing and streamlining internal
administrative operations.
Underthe guidance o$ County Administrator
place which allow--and
Alines of authority are now in
assist--•-County managers to increase.productivity in
I
their respective departments® The results of strong ,
management are already increasing the return on tax
dollars. `
Budgeting functions were among the first to be centralized. f
gar&01�44k,,V_,e
ow integrated with the Board's policy objectives
through consolidated management at the highest level. of
County government„ i
a
s
Page
yr.4r„rsS 5
e
s
a�� 1��y �l + ��tE'—•�$B�a W�—�y^—�.' r
. i.
y®�9
significant departmental reorganizations
have created the framework for greatly improved efficiency
y 1� of County services to the pubic. �
The consolidation of Public Works and Planning Department 2
into a single Land Use and Transportation Department $o
under one Director now ensures cohesive and economical
e
utilization of public resources.
E
t
For example, land utilization and transportation planning
functions have now been integrated; a centralized
one stop” permit process Is now fully operational; and
s°
costly duplication of internal support services #tee-
been eliminated.
e ,
Page
Al so, the combining of the personnel, finance, property
maintenance, purchasing-9-fleet management, data processing
and communications divisions into a streamlined and j
focused Support Services Department nat only provides
�! economies of scale, but also redirects and focuses
tr/ V
the services th�se functions provide, to the operating
departments of the County.
The data processing funcink'a Euz-ha-r--
r ��s. �;_. a commitment fee
indication of -T � �
state-Of-the-axt® professional management. Previous/y;
® were merely decentralized versions
of older nual stems, with no cohesive, strategic
plan guiding t.111
e'growth and management®—` R---II�—
Amin -_,__ x a t, "rn Now, computer services
are contracted t private firm
1
ecause of 'centralized control, ;
dn'lS h ov"'
the County 44achieve major operational and service'
efficiencies over the coming years.
Page
1
The managers who administer these;programs are challenged, ;
evaluated and rewarded'undes a recently implemented -pay
for performance" ;program. Widely used in the private ;i '
sector, these is now a clear understanding of individual +}
tangible motivation toward their fulfill-
objectives, and
ment.
���// While many of the County's new
f
management of County affairs, the public
concern inteYnal
of the straml3ned
�is the direct beneficiary
Public Safety Departments.
Community Corrections and
e in procedure now requires the prioritizing
} A ma]oS Chang Aa//*-,h
P�9sy-P`=
of incoming calls and - resourdes required for adequate
response. This, combi--ad
ith centralized training, a reined internal stsuctur �
and an automated:crime and incident record keeping system,
yields an/enhanced, more effective level of service.
t
amend a higher return on the tax dollar.
r✓• is only part of
-the reorganization of County programs
the process underway to meet the challenges of continued
out adequate, stable funding, existing
growth. With
programs cannot meet the needs of an expanding,
dynamic community.
page
C
- ss
r.
The search for tax revenues, spurred on by a growing
demand for increased sccp-Ace levels, has been hampered
over the years by the County's antiquated 1916 -tax baso-
Under Oregon lata, voter approval is required before a �
local government can exceed ist constitutionally-set
€
base in Vaogirgtan C-ML7
lies assn,baron tax base limit by more than six'percent Despite the
3}a
w4
;,creamed acme than six Partaat In any yeas since first
fact that growth has exceeded a six percent annual rates. �
sata611�aad Sn l91Q,. (..
the County cannot adequately respond to the service
demands-•placed upon ite Yet the county must deal not
only with an increasing population, but with inflatiOn ar;"
pressures as
we
T .... a solar-sPPxavnd.$20 million teo-7aar tan ...
21x7 i® 1931-62. ,&sdlcatmd to the asiacmmnrt:e and repair a_
.aero=e�S..dE_�vdM�—m
mff. lbs eanxo�e a road., tbn Caant9's road pmsrrm " J ...
ap ...
one—
is
etill rsry aarEcvelg umCerta P
TAithout aft 'adequate, 'stable source of funding, and wit="
only a ,� ab to-ka#.se fuVs to meet seryl ee
demands the County's ability to maintain the .
` of life for its-r-��--�c�is impaired.
s
Page
Local governments--city and county--must work together if
maiiaged.' The Board of Commissioners
growth is to be well
is working toward a program whereby city and County
residents share equally in financing the programs
*d_:%fc!VIontribute to the quality of life in Washington
' Count ! _t� AA t> 14- ,
As growth continues, so will the problemsof the over—
crowded jail,_new construction, transportation systems
and utilization of available land. With pub/liz
support, hpro ams will be to ensure that
these issues are managed with a view toward the
presery tion of.
(TRMIS1ST16N)
Through continued organizational refinement...
Through incisive management of budgets and administrative
systems...
Through the utilization of private resources to further
the public good...
And most of all, through the support of the citizens of
Washington County...
• E
r
Page 13
..the programs now underTjay* will succee�dd..�And the
result will be a conti-naation—and 'indeed, an i-80-
of the, quality of life which has made Washington County
Oregon's premier living environment.
CHARACTER VOICE
4-
Well, our
-Wel.l, •our County certainly seemsAdoing _its part.
The rest is up to us. The people who live here.
And I -plan on Living here a long, long time—
on doing
what 1 can to help my County government
meet the needs of a growing, prospering population.
Because quality of life...well, that's why
we're all here, isn't it?
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
t
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA.OF: May 21, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: May 16,- 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: Temporary Use Permit
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: General Issued March 31, 1977
Telephone Temporary Use TU 6-84 REQUESTED BY: General Telephone
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: } l'�7 CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
x
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On March 28, 1977, the Tigard City Council approved a temporary use permit for
a modular office at the GTE site at '8838 SW Burnham. The Council approval was
granted for a`3 year period subject to an annual review by Council. A copy of
theletter granting that ,approval is attached with the minutes of the March
28,: 1977: meeting. The temporary use perm'.t was not reviewed on an annual
basis as required by the original approval at any Lime between March 1977 and
April 1980. The use has continued from March 1977 until the present. The
City contacted GTE as to the status of the office structure and was informed
that GTE wanted to continue the use until the end of 1985. The City requested
that GTE apply for a Temporary Use permit - GTE complied. A copy of the
application is attached. Staff finds that the applicant meets approval under
(d) - (h) of Section 18.140.060 of the Community Development Code.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Grant the Temporary Use Permit as requested until the end of 1985.
2. Grant the Temporary Use Permit for one year.
3. Deny the request.
SUGGESTED ACTION
1
Staff recommends approval for one year pursuant to code limitations in Section
18.140.020 (C) (1) of the Community Development Code. Council may consider
renewal for an additional year at the end of the first year.
lw/1571A
'a
L-a 35
General Telephone Company
of the Northwest, Inc.
April 20, 1984 '
l
A
P`
j;
Ms. Elizabeth A. Newton
City of Tigard
P.Q. Box 23397 '
Tigard, Oregon 97223
r
Dear Ms. Newton, +.
APPLICATION'FOR TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
TIGARD MOBILE OFFICE
, completed application
As requested in you
orarteUsef permit
March lforB = attached
themobile office located at 8838 S.W. I
to extend our temporary
Burnham Street.
As related in our letter of February 10, 1984,
8 , we are
requeses tin g gniextensit lepho on of is
permit because of the many unprecedented
industry, our constant restructuring to keep up with these changes, as well as our
challenge of establishing realisto�r9Qr�sinalthis
applicat n in thatgard. The itdprovides t Pfor the ioe
office remains consistent with 9
tirne as space
rary office
space office. interimhisreliefoccurarounduntilhyear end 1985 when the enew telephone
the cent
equipment is in-service as well as required remodeling work is completed.
Your support in enabling us to conduct "business as usual11 in temporary mobile
space until this time is appreciated.
If you have any questions about this matter, please call our representative, Arlene
Kuntz, at (206)258-0328 in Everett, Washington.
Very truly yours,
Ro ert L. Banks
Acing Supervising Engineer
Land and Buildings
1 Tr.r;y ,
reds. u 66 "N'
L
auval" PA?YI
-mkWommu
CENTRAL f c��tloJ®
c-OwPawSO& uwl r k I I WALL
Gaa1a. PA7 �Q OFFICE ) I laq
iE�. pal• —-—--� ' 1 ! r
GAS6 m VAULT APta Y
s11Fp T� NTER i
f—
Covell, A PAKKiWo II I Fs/
ZZ
c.
4��\ / °rye
2t j /
LA
4f.
y1 b b
° X2(0`31"W
_ - - _ ,_. 4
�FF�ME_- -SUPPORT--CENTER
0
�f' ,
r iEnERAL TEEL.EPHanE cammny OF THE nORTHWEST, one.
_. - . ..; �
inA
Q
MAN
Ems+
WV
„&gg T ;
Ar
` F S
f
y
z
�9rt2.�
MWOU
u `.
M
#x
"s
a
-u
�'.,a� ".v F+,,:,'�w.� � �! �_ - .•1 ��. gam, ��'
a
u , .
2".:rjt G x -s !' �.� •.�{.s is P'k�.
����� � - gni'}•Y�,t
� :u �
r
�e y
: ..,... ...._. .,.. ..:., i',. :.. .. im,.,: ,os-.u: 5 _� �F,...� C � .,er -�`:p �',-"a'r'•':..:fiN,; k:�''y;�'�k'7,�„>t�°'�`..:.�.a. •i"r�.._,`r'��tT` r`;.
„s•-..: .. �'' .G" ..'- s"�:n
„8e2 :. w . r >-cs .=m v�-.tV-• ?„ gee
M,' -gi"yU''3t. _. ',` :.' #X .4.r�}!.i..•a
? s Ey i S s mi n 4 m'
ro .r, r 33r s' � *i # K s ,c
: .-_ _?... s ,. Vi ",....t: t�,,. .,.�
grx, a.�'{` _,a.�}, .»k'-n.}. 1°vs h�:.*, �S> f3;. sh.ac6 cit.ice.k ��r ..r-
... Ya -...�}s _x_::.w `3� ...:u [ ,�i •,'c'3.^ .. v i -a.. Fr"ak t h i;.+ :'. ''«.�.,"'?_
ar� �•._N� .}-,��`E;z"s*�-_��r��.r;sc�z-ar1'4:n-��^�. x�r`.��ir.r",4s,'y�{k'
'`�' ._.�,�..�*��..���...+.,.�.. s�..:�....r'- :.��'F..�-.a��`�P4 � ;:�.��.c�.,.�:.'�..€'�^.a+�t`.�n•��s;•',_s� *T..� -� M � ' �n s�*,
,I
3. PERMIT TO SUMMERFIELD AND KING CITY CIVIC ASSOCIATION
(a) Cal Souther, President of Surrznerfield Civic Association presented proposal
requesting_Council to authorize a permit allowing c istcuction of private
water/sewage line in certain public streets located in the Summerfield area. i
The line is to transport treated sewage effluent from the Durham plant T
to a pond on Summerfield golf course to provide water to be used to irrigate
the course in place ofdomestic water from Tigard Water District.
Souther further stated the line would be jointly owned by Summerfield
Civic Association and King City Civic Association.
Discussion by Council and staff followed'.
Souther introduced Russ Calvin, insurance representative. Mr. Calvin '
explained type of policy that was being written.
City Attorney Bailey stated Council would require certificate of insurance
to assure adequacy of coverage.
Motion by Councilman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Wakem, directing
staff to prepare necessary documents to permit proposed use of line.
Approved by 'unanimous vote of Council.
I
4. 'PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8:25 P.M.
4.1 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT - General Telephone Co. , 8838 S.W. Burnham Street.
Request for use of modular office for 3 years. (Washington County Tax Map
2SI 2DB, Tax Lot 100)
(1) Public hearing opened.
(2) City Administrator stated facts. '((
(3) Public Testimony:
Proponents - Mr. Edwin Bu£fum, Tigard District Manager, General
Telephone Company of the Northwest, requested Council's
approval to establish temporary office'space for a
three year period. Mr. Buffum stated further it would
not be necessary to hook up to sewer.
Opponents - None
(4) City Administrator recommended Council's approval subject to the
following conditions:
1 - Mobil unit meet all applicable fire, life and safety codes.
2 - Council to review within one year to reconsider continutation of
approval.
(5) Public hearing closed.
(6) Motion by Councilman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to
approve temporary use permit subject to Administrator's recommendations.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
t
4.2 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT - Lamb Weston 6600 S.W. Hampton Street. Request to
allow the continued use of a mobil office for an additional six months,
(Washington County Tax Map 2S1 IAD, Tax Lots 3300, 3400 and 3500)
(1) Public hearing opened.
PAGE 2 - REGULAR MEETING MINUTES, March 28, 1977
Isuaw the Q
trefin costs
By CarolynPesce -
USA TODAYwhat afte prad OM "9 g
The nauon's taxpayers are
spending millions of dollars a 1&81 9977 I + Y
Cil-
year to deal witn a"sue the cit I Barumore $2.1 million $1.8 million unavailable
i's
explosion." Cincinnati" $147,800 5'287,700 $154,900
That's how Charlie Rhyne of Cleveland° $3 72,448 $424,347 $400,733
the Naiiorngi Institute of Munic- Detroit $9.5 million $8.5 million tunavailahie
Jpal Law Officers describes the Indianapolis 5225,000 ' $215,100 unavallabl8
record number of lawsuits Las Vegas $18,262 $11,291 $75,593
filed against U.S.cities. Los Angeles $4.5 minion $2.3 million $1.4 million
"I'm up to my eats,"said As- Minneapolis° $50,932 $140,798 unavailable
sistant city)Attorney Thomas - New York City $120m;inon $92:5 million ''Sa24 million
Hopkins in Los Angeles where Philadelphia $10 miilicon $9.7 million $4.5 million
an average of 70claims-a P;;lsburgh $1.6 mtt.on :a2 mdti;on unava;;apla
month are being filed against San Francisco S5.5 million $2:75 million ;$3.8 million
the city. Salt Lake City $102,704 5205;467 527,449
It also means an explosion of Washington D.D. $4.1 million $2.2 million $2 million
taxpayers'dollars Spent by the sneer year.rgures nM compete for 1982.
nation's cities to defend them
selves. ----—
,,. The problem is so severe in ®,"Sue the cities"trend costs millions, 1A
Detroit that a "supervisor of — ------
negligence" was appointed to
handle claims. Detroit paid
more than$9.5 million in 1981,
compared to $1 million 10
years ago.
IZ In Washington, D.C., law-
suit,; have cost $4.1 million in
1982,compared to$2.2 million Q
in 1981.
M In San Francisco, 6,853
claims and lawsuits cost the
city $5.5 million in 1982. The
city paid$2.75 million in 1981.
Some cities, however, are
fighting back.
r4 In St.Paul,Minn.,officials
started a driving course for
employes to cut down on acci-
dents.There's also a program
to spot cracks in sidewalks to
avoid-fall-down"suits.
in In Baltimore, a J reven-
live Law Program recom-
mends guidelines for avoiding
new lawsuits.
,
ffiij
1
CHAR'P I Appendix II
i
✓1 U
a) Y >,
--I� >4
:Q 0 1"
1-1 A
,T 4-)
121
CO
T r-i �
s
Z >+ >+- H 4 1 > 7L
O
O
A
0 0 0G m cn
Z Z � LO
7 W N
0 a)
O G1 a 41
+f QJ
4 co tT
s
4J O tr v 0
!~ ,A Q)
Q) a) >,
0 St O,
W
O O U 4-1 -ri • - --�ys
1 U A O
W r-I rO a) •-1 W �� C -
S t 4-3r-1 ,-1 > 1) O H�..� U
G � 5 � p
•r♦
W
W
O rI
l
n
-' ------------
CHART 1
L
.. Liability Under 42 "1S.C. §1983
ro r' S
4n t^
H �4
fJ SI
-P p N E
-r-1 .4J .4JEn w
t.
r IV
� p w y
cJ �; 3b r
co
n, o
'J -PN i !
-J O fO H !J' 7 3 G P
rin M O I~ �H E-+ � f
o w I~ r _a [u H —u N _
v o4+ a z H 0 c
��� o e '
opo o a Q �I Q � � E-4 {
1 r-4 Q O :H a' H r 6 '_ 7
O ri O �� t
—1 1-4 J
O
r ;4 t .
o >,ro' o
E-4 [-I Cil w R;
ha z E
o
•r{ H
i
i
o a t s r 3 f
4 1 R
4J CJ ! a S V
rS I Sa cj
— i t
124
`L
4; U Dl O r
fi I~ 0
f10
Sa C3
0 gg
f
MEMORANDUM"
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON' s
P
TO: Mayor pro tem and City Council May 15, 1984
l
FROM: Loreen Wilson, Deputy Recorder ,
SUBJECT: May 21, 1984 Agenda information
Please note that this agenda item will be verbal. No information is supplied
c
in the packet.'
P._
lw/1571A
F
ill
i+
k
t
C-
MEMORANDUM'
( CITY OF TIGARD, ,OREGON,
TO: Mayor Pro-tem and City Council May 15, 1984
FROM: Jerri L. 'Widner, Finance Director
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT SUMMARY FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL, 1984
ACCOUNTING:
The third quarter financial report is attached for your information. During
the month of April 448 checks were written, 521 cash receipts were written and
1543 sewer bills were mailed. The new sewer program requires anew ;billing
format, so Word Processing has been preparing the sewer bills in;the interim.
The new billing form will be a; postcard and will cost the City approximately
9.50 to mail as opposed to the current 17V. The printing charges will be 1/4
the cost of printing the current billing form. The new forms should be
delivered in July.
RECORDS:
Word processing has been inputting the names/addresses/account numbers and
charges for sewer customers and printing the bills. Cycle 1 has been billed.
Cycle 2 and 3 will be billed in May and June. In April 111.5 hours were
devoted to sewer billings with a total turn-around time of 128 hours for the
project. In spite of this heavy work load the division has been able to keep
up with the demands from other departments. 131 business tax receipts were
written in April with a total of $5,935.00 collected.
ADMINISTRATION:
The Assistant - Finance Director has been working with negotiations and
recruiting for a Police Clerk Dispatcher. Bid packages for the patch truck,
roller and pole building as well as surveyors have kept her busy with
purchasing.
Three lists for assistance in looking up Bancroft assessments quickly have
been prepared. The Finance Director's time has been spent working on budget,
elections, Bancroft billings, Dartmouth LID and the GO bond sale.
(0364F)
fi
S.:
a. r
r
r.
� r1
O t6 i
N � W
N q m O O
L b q b
q O m O� m
m ! m }4
N i }
m
n h
(A L O C ll� N
U.m N N LLI. � 0
Z �
0 cc
¢ t
J S A
h N N
W C G O
T
q
E•F �
00
N Ib
a
� N
L•p X51 b T c„ O+ Qi N �l1 ul � b I �
m
O� b
C O h �o rn N b b O u-I n O n b rn n O N m m O
m in
M N T d H H H 4n rha .�.� h O n N LO m h T
E E N N of in m N .•+
40
u
p N d G C -
�
f-
u d L O.
W H L (6 v R L L a E +' •:i ? a
on
W (Lys C 17 ) L p ¢
cn C(n wF 16 a C1 J F- U K G 01 3 ¢ L F 6 d f6
¢_ Ai C U u '.L '�,,. a H �4 .D t. y L l7 C L ¢ J
~On O mk n C qOL J CO fO 4 O ¢ 0 J U � ¢.
0 LL
L n ti N C N
N i � <
N O
B Q P m
L.."O
f6 � a. m. m � w rn O - c w� •a
a 7 O .. O •-+ M P V O O
m
1 N N N
i
3 C
v N
� m
U
Y •� m 1n M
LOL m m N
yr m rn
S fT d U
y 6d...0 C
f 2 m V N li rn v m
� 1�-�
O+
¢ T a
n
O C F G M m
c w 7 7 C+ 1 p
LL00 a
LL .v a b� O
O m
A N B X L N
H¢Irl cn
a B v .r rn i
40,
W W N N N
h n 01 h m
•O+-+ M a+ O rn O. a w rn c O 4-� O OI
® •* m N .p ra .p N c m � �D a •a
O m w O W O
O d P11 P N Y b OP m •? v
ul
A
W d d U GE ui
: j Q JI w T y ai W H)
2' TTJ d B a G O p� d L » C L L Hf
• A B fX L L �••� d T ? U X a » G a A L d J
m k t6 1 a d d L A B A G Q B L Q O O C B J F1 A
W T - X U fG M B C£ O w H Y L C L as d C m� H
H a8 B L A T •>' \ O O. 'O N B 2 G A v Q H
H a y U O » 'D B » B •O to L a 7 .•� W d H
U L a s N 4 d ^� W O. L X .II B L 11
Q . JI
H 0. •' L C Lit 7 w Y O •.+ f1] � L C. .L W
H H » .{s » L » B L »U fq U C L a d N J
co 0 4, L W O. N L d a O w O 1 �-' M B U L a QI 0
¢LJ U U d . W..4. C L -0. an » C C .+.+ L
H f U U W A ga.. d 0 t8 O a w a rd G o a 3 0 HO
,} a L) a Q a m 0 o m 3 Zt ro OC fY rz H U w c. U F- LL
.Y
i
a d
L
C
y
� O L
• p
� m
d
CL N w
da
L
3 c
(n LL
U ^
Y . 9
L p C
B - 7
am w
w y U
f— L �
p m
Z
W y#
d T
w<
O� y J•O N.
¢ 0 fa
0 w m.
w m
2 U T x
w Z: :3 c� m
N
LL W VU LL u)
0.2
F-w va
Z
W y
wH
¢ y x L N
v.IB mi
w O C
Z H L L C ^'
U Fz•) fR '�
a s
O 'lf
H c1 =
U E v
O
� p
d< m O O b 0m b O 0O O N O O
O O O m u1 d, O O
a i
•O m ONi �p m 4 N h O -+ �f) O O N p O b i
•C
C C
cn
m
i y
B
w
F-
L mL
t W T d d W d 2 T. Oto c
= J y
0W L
j 2 C LL L. W L M d L L 3 a y d 19 f$ .D .Q y
W F- O O » N T' d W y ra 7 J ` d. {i O J N N d
u a N H .Y a y "O y d OO' d y L
-J O O to u J to ac S w Li ac 0 U U U O
I N.
O N q O-i M W
M, N M m M. M M M M m m M 2Ni M
i
a
_ I
4
L C
a rnw In �
N 6
m
a ^
� G N
a �
<
d N w
W d U P
� L m C
H (n(!f LL
O
O- T
O+ c
Q o Rf w
U O
w
zs ;
w z 3 2
w
w d a <
a
G M Y b L Ir'
to♦-� > �
d a
H
p Id h N h In m N 10 01
O
F 47 In m h e < N
LL
H •••+++lll m m O •• rn v �O �o c+ In O �o
U EEO! m w In m e < N un N Io O N
- U v u7 m R 4 < N m In
v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 < o 0 0 0
a < O O In O In O O O O O O O. O <_ 0 O O m
a m o m lcC m o 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 C 0 C h
rn
C
•�ti � N v m
in R
h
@ B N
d
y1 (y
E £ Ql N a C � E H -( d L R L Gi LL M
W O. 1 Y C O. U m \ (Li. 4- O 'O c' ria (-i� i. ca V;
O W X 'O E L Y \ O C C 'm d CS C
W U� M .Q .roL ICa .0 U. C d
,. 7 .y a J.I \ LL C L 6 P- •O K d Y
w J IM LL [0 C O ~ C 3 0 (�6 K •p 4 ¢
x4. H.
i La. U U (n M (n tX U LL w M N
m M In
rn rn m m m m m rn m m m
ON
Q m
C O a
Y
N L J
Cl m e I N
d 7
CL¢LL
a N
d j Om
to LL m
V m O
L❑C n m
- N
O N
p m
W Y V O
j L❑j
n � '
H Y N LL
Z
W
tlN-
W m T C
6 U O LL b
b
N
b
m
W K T u
W
T
K❑
O W❑ U C7
z m �
£w
H a 6 x a
N
13
H.❑m H N
cn
f%1 h d U t u•1
O
Q m N
LL V
Q
r
F- is
O I m N rn N b �+'+ O O O
O
U G TJ m m N
OE O
v CIREJI Q 0 QO N 'n N n n m m Q h
O O rn M
~ C N
L)
a v O O
ami O O OO O O O O O O O O O O
OOOO O O OOOOC0Cc0o l Q Q C .o a, C O Nto
of m
7 tl' U-1 N O in O+ N N Q m O N N O
C aI N N O
oO.
•+ u In m rn O v N � O Ov
e C m n h N O b m �.' M v 1Pi N m
• N M Q O Q v b m u ni m N N N
K
A g
Y^
0. U C7 N
W L to ¢ T u E C d b K O O
O 7 C L > a d 0'1 a m m L 11 P^ f¢ {„ - Y L �u
Z U C 'O .+f a Ui f3 ¢ d C .O a a > 3 a � w
W A C 3 U 61 to L L t A u W. Y C L .0 f6 d C L 7
7 O d O ? 3. .G 4- T !6 16 Y O- C U' N a rr66 iJ (v C p Y r� ttl
.rI F of N N to n: N A W O 0 a. M O ¢ L O- 2 0 f7 O 9 ❑ 4 N K
Y N LL Z ¢
ix
Kf i0 m p, .+ b .-� N m < rn OF-
lo w
f-
WRIM
F
W W
W
W L
N
NN �O nNi rho �
m.'O h •'� N
N
�n m
N
y
4
4 �
U m
L Cl N N
7 N
n a.W.LL
N m�m p
q
Cf cr,
W y N LL
W T
d ? N N
wm T.a 4 h
¢�U p LL
Kh
LuIsb
m
�Q O r�LL
00
\, 0W W n
O
FK
¢¢.V r6 Ja
O O
2 H L C.L 4
W h
2 OL h
H wa CI O N m M
F [ N O
aLL
LL U m M
O
Ln
m N h n
U n 4 4
a 4 O W N
y W O M OO� M C W L' Il ? W b N N W
6+m W M
<' � U W Q T Oh
mn m m
In
CL
[ [ T 4 v n �� h M 0 �+ Ifl D• 4 W �p N N .!? I^•
n » n W
L
CO
/ wGoT
\\ W Ya- O W O W U LL j L y m
o a
? b t Occ
W J L L fX6
U f•S.' E 4
CL
j T •�pp L L W 1"
N a N ci
2
6 O U N fn N U U y
a '. e Q OJ O LL F 0
a
8
c
a+ rg
(fA L
n
w �
Q m
CL
L•p
d C
d LL
N
U
Y
L O C
cn
1
j L D C
r•� ffi N LL
w
x v >
W m
6 O'B ti
.�U-O
W
x
j6Nl�V
W E C nt�
LLW UC7LL
00
2
w Ldd m
h= B K t
M 41 14 H1
N
W.a :6 7
2 M L C•�"
H
W N
U F"
H O
A
ol
U
o N
.� n O+ .
m e N o n 0 N m O
o I 1 I O
�r C O
V m n:
N O O •• m n m m
7
m ti Q O N Q
O O pl 14 N
aiI n N
rn N � OO M O N n m
NOr Gni m n N R. .p �O n R O
C
to V
C y
U >v
U U
Lot
L Y C t fg T .Li J W
d a � �O. o
m a
w
L T f6 L7 M d Y V fA C�GI
a n' 6
C.7 t L `- AJ .0 O y f"
41
co
.n
o 0
m M m
.n Irl a
0 c Irl nl m a
t. i°.
y of
i NI
Val ¢LL m aM
�p NI N N
L a
r r a
d
Vl N N N ti
U
a `
w a v or
� Y
cc O 2
crl to N
N N
m m
O O 0 LL �;..
O O U
W m 1
O 2
6 6 f3 y }
N r
W¢ fd C ifl I m� O
m h'O01
f3 m m m N
oc
G
H O re
d'D 111
N O
d c
I < v
Go
d v
C gyp. Vl N m ti a
LL O wN� O. d
d L y C
LL O d C 0.
II. H
C7 1+ an C �. '!7 W x MLiW
LL
O O H d CVL d O. U 'O 'O 7 L 0 s L r
�. x G x C C LL d w d d 'a
a n L W W £
L m m m 0
W C .s.+ d I I O O W
a
p. L L C a O C J-� d 6 A fb ¢ L L
W _y S w $- m H d C. O. O L d m
FZ- �''
O
CO
C Od , O h f-. U O
_
a
x.
LIBRAW
PUBLICPhone 639-9511
12568 SW Main•Tigard,-®r.97223 MONTHLY REPORTApril 1984
TO: Library Board
City Council
FROM: City Librarian
OLA Conference: All members of the full-time staff attended various sessions
at the annual Oregon Library Association conference held at Rippling;River +.
resort April 12-14. Staff time was scheduled to permit attendance for all
and still maintain adequate library staffing.
WCCLS Budget: The interim library, services contract with the County, signed
by Tigard and nine other cities, was refused by Beaverton City Council. An
amended contract omitting Beaverton's participation was again signed by all
other ,city 'councils.
WCCLS Professional Board: Of interest: r- (1) The ad hoc committee, appointed i
to recommend procedures for-'terminating;county-wide freeaccessto city �
libraries in the, event WCCLS is not funded in 1984-85, reported to the Board.
Various issues concerning date of :termination of services, cost of library
cards for out-of-city users, notification to out-of-city patrons and dispo-
sition of the WCCLS union catalog:'were discussed. The only action taken
was to terminate_out-of-city service on July 1, 1984. The next Board meeting
will follow the May 15 election date and the question of WCCLS funding through
the County Tax Base will have been decided. It is possible that WCCLS could
go on the June ballot with a separate levy.
t
Volunteers: 24 volunteers worked a total of 217.75 hours; daily average 9 hours.
i
Work Indicators: April 1984 April 1983
Adult Books 5943 6649
Juvenile Books 2645 2547
Interlibrary Loan 76 96
Magazines 509 562 ..
Records/Cassettes 148 122
Other 63 60
TOTAL CIRCULATION 9,384 10,036
Days of Service 20 22
Average Daily Circulation 469 456
Increase/Decrease Circulation - 6% + 1%
Reference/Reader's Advisory 480 512
Materials Added 360 677 ,'
Materials Withdrawn 7 553
Story Time Total 74 54
201/102=303
Borrowers: new/renewal 222/119=341
TIGARD PUBLIC LIBRARY - MONTHLY REPORT -' Aprik 1984 - page 2
Children's Services: The Friends of the Library donated $850 to the
libY3ry: $500 for children's books, primarily picture books, and
$350 for cassettes.
Circulation was down from March 1984 and up 4% from April 1983.
J/Y ,paperbacks from Himiser were ordered in April and should
"arrive soon and it is expected that there will be an upturn in
J/Y fiction circulation when they are on the shelves.
St. Anthony's first grade class came for a tour, story and
orientation. All the K-3 classes :from St. Anthony's have
now been to` the- library.
The summer reading packet and other materials have been received
and ,planning continues for this program.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY'
AGENDA OF: May 21, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #: ,
DATE SUBMITTED: May16, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly
Report - April - Planning and REQUESTED BY:
Development
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: ;
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached is the monthly report for Planning and Development for April, 1984.
Enclosed are:
Cover memo - including Comprehensive Plan update
Building Division Report
Planning Commission minutes and Planning Director Decisions
Annexation Report
Code Enforcement Report
Economic Development Committee Report
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Accept and place on file.
(0444P)
dmj
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Members of the City Council May 15, 1984
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development G% L
SUBJECT: Monthly Report April
Attached "please find the April monthly report for the Department :of Planning
and Development. Elements of the report are:
BuildingDivision Report
Planning Decisions
Code Enforcement Report
Annexation Report
Economic" Development' Committee Report
i
Building and Planning Activities were strong again during April. Twenty four
f single family permits were issued. In addition, six commercial permits were
granted bringing the total for 1984 to twelve, only four less than all of
1983. The commercial activity is recognized to be of significance because of
its impact not only on revenues, but the city's tax base and economic growth.
Compared to 1983, through April, building activity is running higher than
1983. Following is a comparison:
Through March 1983 Through March 1984
Single Family Permits 66 76
Commercial Permit 1 12
Building Permit Fees 28,099.00 35,986.60
Pian Check Fees 20,307.51 17,959.03
Plumbing Permits 8,030.00 12,939.80
Mechanical Permits 1,621.44 1,973.02
Sign Permits 695.00 855.00
Valuation 5,578,241.00 7,542,706.00
Comprehensive Plan Report
On April 26, Liz Newton, Attorney Tim Ramis, and I appeared before LCDC at
Tigard's acknowledgement hearing for our comprehensive plan. Based on LCDC
staff findings, our request was continued until July l by LCDC. During the
interim we will take steps to address the deficiencies identified. Many
actions have already been set in motion which have reduced the number of
outstanding issues to only a few policy considerations.
0444P
dmj
(' MEMORANDUM
L TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: May 1, 1984
P
SUBJECT: Monthly Report for month of APRIL - Building Division
April's building activities include permits for 13 sign, 24 single family
residential, ` 2 residential alter/repair, 1 multi-family, 6 commercial, 5
commercial alter/repair, ;1 New Garage, 1 Fill,; and 1 KingCity for a total
valuation of $2,381,085000.
Fees for 41 ; permits $17,785.00
Fees for 13 signs 190.00
Plumbing Acitivity 37 4,935.10
Mechanical Activity - 34 544.50
d
TOTAL.......$ $23,427.60
C
Sewer Connections - 28 $25,375.00
Sewer Inspections - 28 $ 1,025.00
x
ooe� od000aaoa000004� 0000000d ® aooa ® oo ®`00000 0
� 000a000000000A000000000000000000000'000'00 0
H Aq 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0' O O •O O O YT O C; O O O O C; C; d O O O O o 0 0 d 0 0 0 1� d
@+ t 9 0 0 0 d O O O O d 0 4 S d 0 t+) O O O O d 0 0 O O O O O O d 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O v Go
`aG d 0 Ga O O.O A:O O OWN O O.O O O ta`f O Q-A 0 0 0 0 00`O O O O A 0 0 0 t�1 0 0 d0 O O
aLn 42� m m M S0.cn N T v-1 r4 0% 6t to %D 0% r9 r1 cn Ar W cr) LM A N LM in N O r4 O O N O en W O H N H
r� to In �. rm w to %D vo %C tD Q m 0A aD n ti rD n to 4T A e, 10 10 0to %0 N -W vD M r4r4 r4 M
7-1
04
94 ad cd Cd ad
r4 r-4 e-4 rA r4 r4 r•4 r•4 H r-1 r-4 r-i H H ri r-4 r1 r4 r4 r4 r 7 e-1 rH r-1 H H r-4 r4 ,
Cd d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d cc d d d d d d M d d d e4 H H H rl H r4.r4 r4 r-1 H 2t
4 -4..A M M:.r4 M .Aa M M.M w4 M -14 M M M M .4 -4 .Ar .4 -4 M ..4 M d:d d d...d d -d d d d d 4y
A3 A� .4) 43-Aa Aj Aa .1, W Aa -&) W 4.) Al 4.1 .N .6.) 4.) J.) A.) .4a A.) 4 � .41:A1 A. M M M M M M M M M M w4 =
4t'I 1� O O 4a. In 93 a t'. 4+...tr O 93'f: 64 6a:C 4'+ R..0 C 0 Q C C-C 44 a s O D U U U U V U U U U U
tdC tea 0) 4D '" 0 0 d A) 4N 0 0 0/ 4A 0) 1U O 0, 0 Q) 09 01w 0 0) I Oy U w � to 6a to N to to 14 to ta. b 44}
O "1S '� '4y .D R1 '12 `S9 `07 10 v 'Lt v v v '47 'D 'C v li `d 'O 10 10 M `D ro `D N m 41 ®D (3) d 0):0) 0) 0 d M
r4 C� •r. .r1 w4.M .74 .4 .r1.N M M M M w4 M. 4 .N .e4 .i-1 -4 M .r4 -4 .r4.M g1 .r, M M d T4
W 0 d 0 0 W d to w to U w 0 w N to 0 0 0 w N N 4A m W to N
0 0 0). 0 0),d Olt-0 O N.0 to 0 0) 0) d"0i d 0) 0) 0) to 0 0 0 a) d O: O 6 'O'0 0 0 O 0'0. O,to .«.
.-4 6tlRStM Ai0at'0wNwNCSww0w03w0iw00Z0w0v0v000:,00U0U0Ct.
.e4 ...
P
*4
H H
8'a b, W s '4a 9 to •t+ 0 .� m
,.4 p p ..a p d p U p 6r+
As d 41 0) m m U 0)) W a a 4)
)1 to tea �[ > 0) 4) to e07 co ' ' ' ` (d a 03 44))
S9 to 0) 0 to 40 6A d to '. to p O H •r. to 94 to .0 x x x ... d O r4 to r1 to
d' to V d L) 0 .0 r•4 V d "O 10 V O to A, U 4p 10 41 0 N O A. 0 A. 4.1
,�Z W 4.) 41 H •+4 Ca R. rA O 0 d 0 0) 0 In 1-1 O w M U U U U U U d p0 1A w
44 to Vd to to to U to 0 0 to r4 U to t7> 0 od M M M w4 .4 M r`4 6: G
H ca 0 Q .0 .0 .0 09 d 'O 4) 0) .'$ ,°$ 4) m O d C d 0) 0% 3$ RS 44 44 44 44 44 44 D. 64 0 41 0 .N
.= ... 62l A.) 43 .b) .0 X." Sa 0. toW 0a 1C) 0 O Sa 01 v .0 a 0 O) 60.4 ..a M ..4.,4 M d 'U 6+" ^C1 C' =
p 43 �4a 41 43.C6 00 co 41 43 m 0. 0 0 0) 0. t. d -v N r4 to Aa m 440 ;4 = U U U U U U V a$ 94 d to d 4,
4.::00 4)® O O N N N d to en O OO V) .0 O 03 rl 4r) to O to d M d to d d d d to lar d to d 64 W
o-� O tT O• VJ G r4 H r4 aG d r< 0 to 4U O+ to 0 P 0 �d C3 %0H W 4.d P. 0. 0. 0, W @..90w O A 0 0 40
rd
w en to Vd ti 0 :a e9 :1Z to 3t ca 03 W C4 to to O O 0 VJ H V2 6A V2 tow Go
4n VJ V) VS to 0 Ola i
Eel Den to M) A en OO dv1O toO to to err -O. 4r1 M to O en to W kn OOtnO wlO
O p' a .o N r'4 r- n sD N W tao to to * O O Or 00 tr1 Ln r4 to r4 d r4 4r CO to OT v0 to -Cr O td M 1 O O cn .o o-•. a
p 0 0 H V-4 ^a N N to N .D to Ar O N o0 r 47 W r+ n = a r4 V1 H M vD 4A H %D r5 r4 r4 N CO 00 r-4 H O to O -
p Co jr 'W r✓) ate N N N N -AT ri aD r4 % ut .D rD 00 re r4 17 .D 4r c0 T r-4 N N M -4 M rCl) V) en `V to O N N N N
p n H r'4 r4 r4 r4 r4 r-4 r4 0 H H H 0- 43% r4 H CO 0 H 01 r4 4T r•4 01 r4 r4 r-1 H H r) 14 H H N r-4 v-1 r4 r4 1-4 r-4
6Y5
C9
H
fro
C Ar
O r4 to N
14 4A to 441 FA • to � ta . . 0..Ade-44 0 8 0)
@ «4
0 41 a) (9LD 0 U 64 14 0) :4 t4 N to d :7 Aa 41 w C3 4I J;.to Xe
84 0 >r 1l I '0 0 a Y9 'O ra '0 ,0 10 V 44 W to to a 0) C 34
U (J 0 O 0 0r40 94 r-4 rd 0 0) r-4 H r-i r4 09 0 0 H rA 3: M 4) 4g
ggV is t4 x x go x Aa p p C Eri p 6t4 0 .0 t0 0) O O 0. bar 0 &) 0 0 to 1J
to 0 0 m 0 O 41 = dAa 0 to U 4a to A. O
Rd d 4 A aa7 O Aa Aa AA da to H. O O 0 N 04 w N H C0 to to u tt O FA g O U O M 4J 0 Sa
0 .'it CA,Q A Ca to to Gl see 4) N 0 0 0 O O 0) 4A N 0 0 0 0 0 O M $,a �49 940+ 10 AG jt
6C'3e 151. 40 w Al CJ 0) 0 r) t0 V a) 0 r1 r4 r4 '0 r4 r4 H r1 V2 .!~ r4. 0 O d 9 d r-4 r4 o-3 4J
0) �.
A V M vt4 to t4 t4 r4 tmt rt r-4 H H r4 r4 4r1 to r•4 r•4 r•4 r^4 Pv r4 tt 0 CY to 10 V d t '.y r•4 d 1 A L9
R V9 to V O U U U U-1 to 0 64 d p M.,4 .re t4 0 •A• M .Aa ..+ 0 ."d •r• 0 JU .W 44 94 -1 W 43 4.2 O
M d O x 4) CO 0 4) $: O i.. 9 Z :9 z :0 0 1" }a",.' $.' 0 4A;c �s C3 r•4 U 0 O = g2 H x O Ct4
9 > t,1 �a'. 00 to 60 60 A+ A d Aa 4.a »�- ��tt 94 0 R :1 0 44 44 4J ,'g to 'Y9
0 X•1 0 A .4.4 ^� 0. :jr 4- "+4 �4 6a g. � 0 1'0 f" '41' X: 'C'9 X: 'a `10 0 0 U O 6". 6.t
® d O M "G M .At-.4•r4 .r4 m O to O d O 0 d w r4 O. O 6VJ O w d to-.0 O A U O w 0 to d to m 0 to 0
TA:aq.F
pills
r
00 4000C> 000000 0
C�
C; C4 00QQC; OO.Q f3
0 CT. N r4W4n O.N:MMOM.tntiiiii
n
:. r-4 r-7 r♦ M r4 -
� a0
5-4 ` O
H
LI Lo 11:4 ta tft
1-4
rl '`
tm
O O 0 C O O O 1-4 O O
C+ti O O O (9 0 O O a4 m 0
va Gfl .POi .4Si €68 RR lb O �"
&s t4 4"4 S.1 W 4id 6.1 td 6a aD
ZL d 4N d 4) V >a .«a a) 414 4) "a 'a .O
LZc Ga C fa. 0 C? V IN Ou Oe w 0 R
G°. Q. O Q�N 419 LG Q. 42. A, 40 N N
mo :E �
sn ON 4n6114T0 c8 0N06oto
M A.4 W M ,L3.ap CA 4T H to 4!f !n In N M
G3 r740 .ytQn 4n 64 H Hr^4 H riH
Q tES N f0 a6? an M ri 0 w �D N eD 0
3
4-4
0.
!� to m -
M 6A RO t. 0411 .'. r'7
r-1 6.1® an 114 . U O O Re
i) eg .44 dJ 0 0. bo t. G r4
4d .0 t4 d 4 .r4 d 4J .F4 �r. Q1 t4
Pj _.s4. H 9+ 1.4 ."s9
Lei
N O p O
00 O n p O
m n rn
v
L O N O
4
L �
.0
9
U
L
7 O O O
i.
1
v �
{
C) 4
C O :
W v
Q
z
H N i
A
oPQa
ro J W rn
S
g o 0 o k
Paa On O O
0 0
d
- �. O
m k
.+ m
// O O p O [
1. c3o
O N
Ooo S
r N l
N N
7 CJ .o
H f� N N
N N N
a v
O 1+ N
N tocu
A 8
.. ti rill 6 ti
E
i
i
S .
1 .
f .
_ .rt
N '{
F
G U O O O
o y
a �
O �
C f
N i+ FI N
ci
41
d m a v b 4
vCd
"i
1
to w
a
p 0 Go co m s
10 a
14
H
O O
O
a o
O
w «
0
m 6
U
H co
4:"j
+J
O
O
a14
c
ti tie N
Otft
Pl A
by
V V O � V
a s u
63
04
4 40
In 0�
-a
s
L`
TIGARD 'PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - APRIL 3, 1984
I. President Tepedino called the meeting to order at 7.35 -PM. The meeting
was held at Fowler Junior High School ` - LGI Room - 10865 SW Walnut,''
Tigard, Oregon. After calling the meeting to order, President Tepedino
stated because of his work he would be -resigning his position as Planning
Commission - Chairman and also would be resigning from the Planning
Commission after the May 15th election. '' He then turned the meeting over
to Vice Chairman Moen.
2. ROLL CALL: "PRESENT: President Tepedino; Commissioners Butler, Edin,
Fyre, Moen, Owens, and Peterson.
ABSENT: Commissioner;Vanderwood,,Leverett.
STAFF: Director of Planning & Development Bill Monahan; `
Associate Planner Keith Liden; Associate Planner. _
Elizabeth Newton; Secretary Diane M.'Jelderks. 1
i
3. Minutes from March 6, 1984 were considered. Commissioner Edin noted on
page 7 agenda item 5.2 that he had voted no. Commissioner Butler noted- ,
on page 9, conditions for 5.3, there should be a #11 condition the same as:
item 5.2. Also on page, 10 Mr. Ludlum's name needed to be corrected. °
Commissioner Tepedino moved for approval with corrections. Commissioner
Butler seconded.
r
Motion carried unanimously. �.
4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION
® Agenda items 5.6 and 5.7 would not be heard tonight.
5.1 CPA 2-84 ANNEXATIONS
A request by the City of Tigard to add a policy to the City's
Comprehensive Plan requiring that lands annexed to the City be given the
City zoning designation which most closely conforms to the existing county
designation for the property. The policy will be added as 10.1.3 in the
Comprehensive Plan.
o Associate Planner Newton, made staff's recommendation to adopt policy
10.1.3. Discussion followed.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
® No. one appeared to speak. pp
t
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
as Commissioner Tepedino moved for approval per staff's findings and
recommendations. Commissioner Owens seconded.
m Motion carried unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 1
5.2CPA 3-84 OPEN SPACE OVERLAY
A request by the City of Tigard to adopt a site specific map designating'
floodplain areas within the City's Urban Growth 'Boundary with a
floodplain district overly.
o Associate Planner Newton made 'staff's recommendation that the
Planning Commission approve a recommendation forwarding to City
Council the open space overlay` and: land use designations to
properties within the; open ,space boundaries.'- Land use designations
should be in conformance with existing zoning designations on all
_properties.'
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
e No one appeared to speak.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
e Commissioner Tepedino questioned why houses were allowed, to be built
in the floodplain. Discussion followed on ,how homes were built in
greenway floodplain areas and whether this would encourage building
in open space areas.
e Commissioner Tepedino moved to table until staff could determine
,ef which lots are specifically affected, what peramiter was used to draw
the greenway and contact Legal Counsel on how to deal with lot
specifically affected. Commissioner Edin seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
5.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 4-84 ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-84
VARIANCE V 6-84 WGK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NPO # 3
A request for a Comprehensive Plan Change from Professional Office to
High Density Residential and a Zone Change from C-P (Professional
Commercial) to R-40 (Multiple Family Residential, 40 units/acre) and to
s
vary the Residential Density Transition requirementin Section
18,40.040 of the Community Development Code on the 4.33 acre, property
located on the northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific Hwy.
(Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10AC, Tax Lot 1000).
o Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval.
NPO COMMENTS
o Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, NPO #3, made recommendation that the
Planning Commission approve this application.
APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION
a Dale McCullough, 3027 Watercrest Road, Forest Grove, explained the
difficulty they have been having trying to develop property as
commercial. Now were requesting a change to high density residential.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 2
a Ryan O'Brien, representing the applicant, reviewed the topography and
shape of property to support their request for a variance. He
explained how the owner realized; it was a ' mistake to have the
property zoned commercial and because of the NPO 413's input, decided.
to request the change.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
e Fred A. Anderson, represented himself as a property owner, as well as
being ;an attorney for several other property owners. He did not
oppose,, the application. He was concerned that the development would<
be developed in accordance with City code. He submitted :a statement
of Sewer Service availability from USA. His main- concern was for
_proper sewer service and storm water drainoff.
a Jean K. Young, Mayor of King City, 15390 ;SW 116th, was also concerned
with same probleiAs as Mr. Anderson. They want to be assured that the
sewer service and storm water drainage will, be adequate to handle
this development. Also wanted Beef Bend Road to be taken'care of.
e Dennis Bouman, City Administrator for King ' City, 11588 SW Royal
Parkway, was concerned that access to the project be properly
constructed.
o Beverly Frowde, 12200 SW Bull Mountain,', CPO Chairperson. They were
concerned about the condition of the traffic system. Does not oppose
the plan.
CROSS EXAMINATION & REBUTTAL
a Vice President Moen asked staff how the public concerns would be
addressed.
® Associate Planner Liden explained how Site Development Review would
address these problems. Discussion following regarding the process.
Q Bob Bledsoe stated he had contacted USA and since they had taken over
sewer service from TDC there is adequate service available. Also
City code would require street improvements to City standards.
0 Commissioner Edin felt he would rather have Planning Commission
review the Site Development Review.
a Discussion regarding density transfer and open space recreational
area.
a Ryan O'Brien stated they intended to request Planning Commission
review the Site Development Review. He also explained how they would
take care of sewer, storm water service and traffic circulation.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
( COMMISSIONER DISCUSSION & ACTION
e Consensus of Commission was to have the Site Development Review
application come before them.
APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
4
e Commissioners Edin, Butler and Moen"were -concerned about the variance
(` but felt they could support asthe neighbors did not oppose.
® Commissioner Edin moved to forward recommendation ofapprovalto City
Council for CPA 4-84, and approve ZC 4-84 & V ;6-84 with the condition
that Planning Commission review`" the Site Development Review.
Commissioner Owens seconded.
9 Commissioner Moen asked they add that staff address '.problems of ;.
sewer, ,storm_water and traffic.
Motion carried unanimously.
5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 'AMENDMENT CPA 12-84 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 8-84 LEE €
CUNNINGHAM NPO # 7
A request: for a zone change from R-7(PD) (Residential ; Single Family, 7-
units/acre, Planned Development) to CP (Commercial Professional) ; and a
Comprehensive Plan change from Medium Density Residential to
Professional Office on property located at ''12528 :SW Scholls Ferry Road, 6
Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map ISI 33AD, Tax Lot 2400).
o Associate Planner 'Liden made 'staff's recommendation for approval. .
NPO COMMENTS
e Richard Boberg, -NPO #7 Chairman, submitted a letter supporting the '
application.
_p
APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION
a Lee Cunningham, 12528 SW Scholls Ferry Road, explained why the
property had not developed already as CP and requested to regain CP x
zoning. s
i
PUBLIC TESTIMONY ,
e
a No one appeared to speak.
CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL
e Commissioner Owens commented that she had mentioned this during the
comprehensive plan hearing and had thought this lot was to be CP on
the Plan.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSIONER DISCUSSION & ACTION
s Commissioner Owens moved to forward CPA 12-84 to City Council with
recommendation of approval and to approve Zone Change ZC 8-84 per
staff's recommendations. Commissioner Fyre seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 4
5.5 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 17-83 BEDFORD PROPERTIESNPO # 3
An appeal to the Planning Commission regarding the Planning Director's
approval of Site Development Review SDR' 17-83 for establishing two
retail shops, ' a convenience store, and a fast food restaurant on
property located at 13235 SW Pacific 'Highway, Tigard (Wash.' Co. Tax Map
2S1 2CB,', Tax Lot 300 and 301).
a -Associate Planner Liden summarized a" Letter from the applicant
contending the appeal :had been submitted inaccurately and that the
appeal should be considered invalid.
a Discussion followed on whether they should hear , the item if the
appeal had been 'delivered to the inappropriate authority. Consensus
was to hear public testimony.
NPO COMMENTS
a , Bob Bledsoe, NPO' #3, commented that the NPO had heard this item at
one of their meetings and were not a part of the appeal.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
a Joe Van Lom, 34' NW First Street, Suite 309,, gave their reasons why
they ,feel 'the appeal should be invalid.e
e Duane Meyer, 13210 SW Watkins, supported hearing the appeal.
e JB Bishop, 303, 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. , explained why he felt the
appeals should be valid.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION & ACTION
a Commissioner Tepedino felt the statute of limitations had been passed
and the Police Department is not the appropriate authority.
p Consensus was that the Police Department was not the appropriate
authority,
a Commissioner Edin moved for denial of the appeal for SDR 17-84 based
on the finding that the appeal was not delivered to the proper
authority. Commissioner Owens seconded.
Motion approved ,for denial by majority vote. Commissioner Moen
voting no and Commissioner Butler abstaining,
5.6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 11-84 ZONE CHANGE 7-84 TIGARD
WEST DEVELOPMENT NPO # 3
A request for a Comprehensive Plan Change from Low Density Residential
to Commercial General and for a Zone Change from R-3.5 (Residential 3.5
units/acre) to CG (General Commercial) on property located at 10500,
13370, 13450 13490 and 13530 SW Watkins Ave. , Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map
2S1 3DA, tax lots 4700, 4800, 6100, and 6200 and 2SI 3DD, lot 200).
,
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 5
• a
e Commissioner Tepedino moved to postpone hearing to May 8, 1984.
Commissioner'Edin seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.,
5.7 ZOA 4-84 - RESIDENTIAL HOMES
A request by the City of Tigard for a zone ordinance amendment adding
language to ,the Code to clarify the definition of commercial activities
in residential zones and providing that commercial activities are
prohibited in residential zones except for as allowed by the code, and
'further clarifying the definition of HomeOccupations, Section 18.142 as
a commercial_ activity in a residential zone.
o This item was withdrawn per City Council.
5.8 ZONE CHANGE ZC 9-84 RUSS KRUEGER NPO #
Request for _a Zone Change from R-7 (Residential 7 units/Acre) to R-I2
(Residental '12 units/acre) on property located east of 135th Ave.
approximately one-half mile south of Scholls Ferry Road, in the southern
portion of the Winterlake development. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 33DC, Tax
Lot 500).
e Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval.
NPO COMMENTS
r a Richard Boberg, NPO #7 Chairman, submitted NPO V's recommendation
� .. for approval with concern for adequate buffering.
APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION
® Russ Krueger, 12225 SW Second, reviewed history of the project and
requested the Planning Commission to rezone his property back to what
he had previously had approved four years ago.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
a Janet Hasty, 13065 SW Falcon Rise Drive, submitted petition opposing
the zone change.
a Joan Abry, 11950 SW Morning Hill Drive, opposed the zone change.
e Mark Bonebroker, 13265 SW Falcon Rise, opposed change because of
length of time and increased density which would result is decreased
value to their homes.
CROSS EXAMINATION & REBUTTAL
o Russ Krueger stated the change happened in November of 1983.
Otherwise for the last four years they had the R--12 zoning. He also
stated this would he a high quality project and would not decrease
values of the surr:;unding homes.
e Discussion followed regarding zoning - on surrounding properties,
policies which Would apply and compatibility.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 6
E
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION & 'ACTION
roved for high density
® Commissioner Owens explaine originally how she had`.beenbapp een Chairperson of NPO 4�y ;
when this application had
(l2 units/acre) seven or eight years ago.
rove the zone change, ,but would.
a Consensus of the
Commission tosto assure compatibility. {
like to see the development
® Discussion on how to process. �
® Commissioner Butler moved to approve ZC 9-84 with a PD overlay, from
R-7 to` R-12PD based on -staff's and Planning Commission's findings.
Commissioner Peterson seconded.
Motion carried unanimously. 4
COMMISSIONER TEPEDINO LEFT MEETING AT 11:00 P.M.
CITY OF TIGARD NPO # 5
5.9 ZONE CHANGE ZC 5-84 a from Light Industrial
A,request ,by the City'; of Tigard for a zone cdesggnated ;Light Industrial
(I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) on property
Comprehensive is located on SW
on the adopted Plan Map. The prop
Washington, 12DC, Tax Lot 900.
Upper Boones"Ferry Road, County Tax Map 2S1
Newton made staff's recommendation for approval,
® Associate Planner
explaining
how this had been a mapping error.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
a No one appeared to speak.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION & ACTION
a Commissioner Edin moved for approval. of ZC 5-84 per staff's
recommendation. Commissioner Butler seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
5.10 CPA 5-84 CITY OF TIGARD CHAPTER 18.114: SIGNS
I N18.114: SIGNS, of the
A request by the City of Tigard to amend Chap royal of sign code
Community Development Code to add sofnneonssigns for approval
exceptions and criteria for app
w - Associate Planner Newton reviewed approval criteria for sign code
exceptions and requested the Planning Commission forward a
recommendation to City Council.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
a No one appeared to speak.
APRIL 3, 1984 PAGE 7
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - -
4
t.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED''
COMMISSION DISCUSSION &"ACTION
a Discussion followed regarding proposed criteria.
® Commissioner Owens moved to forward a 'recommendation to the City
Council to amend the Community Development Code adding Section
18.114.145, Approval Criteria for Exceptions to the Sign Code, as
listed below:
1. The proposed sign code exception is necessary because a`
conforming building or "sign on an adjacent property would limit the
view of a sign erected on the site .in conformance with the sign code
standards.
2. The proposed exception to theheight limits in the sign code is
necessary to make the sign visible from the street because of the
topography of the site.
3. There is an access drive which services the business or service
from a street other than the street the 'business or. ,service is
located on.
Commissioner Peterson seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
5.11 CPA 10-84 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS
A request by the City of Tigard to amend various sections of the
Community Development Code. A complete list of the Sections to be
amended and the proposed language changes are available in the City's
Planning Department.
a Associate Planner Newton reviewed item III-162 regarding street
trees, recommending changing from 3 to 2 inches.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• Chris Freshly supported changing street trees from 3" to 211.
® JB Bishop supported changing size of street trees and to delete 50
feet apart.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION & ACTION
e Commissioner Edin moved to accept staff's recommendation to change
three (3) inches to two (2) inches and delete "planted no more than
50 feet apart". Commissioner Owens seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 8
f
a Commissioner Owens moved to continue CPA 10-84 to April 17th
meeting. Commissioner Edin seconded.
j
Motion carried unanimously.
i
5.12CPA 6-8'' CITY OF TIGARD CHAPTER 18.130 CONDITIONAL USES a
A reques by the City of Tigard to amend Chapter 18.130 of the Tigard s_
Municipaj `Code, , Conditional Uses, adding standards for approval of
transier -edging; Wholesale, storage and distribution; Participation l
sports and recreation - indoor and outdoor and Vehicle fuel sales with
convenience sales. '
m -Associate _Planner Newton made staff's recommendation to forward "
recommendation of approval to 'City Council.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
® No one appeared to speak.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
t,
F;
COMMISSION DISCUSSION & ACT11 "
s
0 Commissioner. Owens moved to forward arecommendation to the City. .. -
Council of approval to include the Conditional Use Standards for
Transient Lodging/Restaurant (on same parcel); Wholesale, :Storage and
°Distribution; Participation Sports and: Recreation; and Vehicle Fuel
Sales with convenience sales. Commissioner Edin seconded.
Motion carried unanimously. Y
5.13 CPA 7-84 CITY OF TIGARD VOLUME 1 and VOLUME 2 DEQ k'
A request by the City of Tigard to amend the Air, Water & Land Resources
Quality Comprehensive Plan Report, Volume 1 and to amend Volume 2,
Findings Policies and Implementation Strategies as recommended by the
Department of Environmental Quality. .
e Associate Planner made staff's recommendation to forward to City
Council with approval.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
p Mrs. Ball requested that a capacity be placed upon USA to ensure that '
Durham Waste Treatment Plant will be able to handle City's needs
sufficiently. '
Discussion followed.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION & ACTION
Commissioner Edin moved to forward a recommendation to the City
Council to approve the amendments to the Resource Document the
Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies Document; and the
Community Development Code as suggested by the letter from DEQ and
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 9
supported by staff. Also that ' staff forward to City Council a
recommendation that something be 'included in the plan regarding the
capacity of the 'Durham Waste Treatment Plant, Commissioner Butler
seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
5.14 CPA 8-84CITY OF TIGARD Policy 6.3.2 (b)
-A request by; the City of Tigard to "amend 'policy 6.3.2 (b) to omit the
examples listed under the policy.
a Associate Planner Newton reviewed staff's recommendation.'
e Discussion followed.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
a ' No one appeared to speak.
PUBLIC 'HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION & ACTION
9 Vice-President Moen moved to forward s recommendation to CityCouncil
amending policy 6.3.2(b) by deleting the examples contained in the
policy. Also adding under definition in the Community Development
Code a definition for Compatibility as well as a Compatibility
Matrix. Commissioner Edin seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
5.15 CPA 9-84 CITY OF TIGARD/CHAPTER 18.26/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEFINITIONS
A request by the City of Tigard to amend Chapter 18.26 of the Community
Development Code adding definitions for "Home Occupations", "Remodel"
and "Addition".
e Commissioner Owens moved to continue to April 17, 1984, and to
include a definition for compatibility. Commissioner Edin seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
5.16 ZONE CHANGE ZC 6-84 CITY OF TIGARD
A request by the City of Tigard to designate specific parcels of land as
Historic Overlay Districts (HD) in conformance with the adopted
Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Properties are the Upshaw House/Seven
Gables (Wash. Co. Tax flap 2S1 11BD lot 1521), the Tigard Grange (Wash.
Co. Tax Map 2S1 31; lot 600), the Tigard Farmhouse and Windmill (Nash.
Co. Tax Map ISI 3'sDD lit 100) and Tigard Feed and Seed (Wash. Co. Tax
Map 2S1 2AB lot ') nO A-1),
o Associate Planner Newton reviewed sires which staff is recommending
for Historic Overlay District.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
6 No one appeared to speak.
PLANNING COM41SSION MINUTES - APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 10
a '
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
�f
COMMISSION DISCUSSION & ACTION
a: Commissioner Edin was; concerned taking, action unless property owners
were notified. Commissioner Edin moved to table CPA 9-54 and 'ZC 6-84
until the 'April 17th meeting to ;give staff time to notify property
owners. CommissionerPeterson seconded.
Motion carried unanimously. '
6. MEETING;ADJOURNED: 12:10 A.M.
Diane M. JelderW Secretary
ATTEST:
A. Donald Moen, Acting Chairman'
(DMJ:Iw/0394P)
�e
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES _ APRIL 3, 1984 PAGE 11
t .
p:
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING - APRIL 17, 1984
1. Vice President Moen called the meeting to order at 8:10 PM. The meeting
was held at Fowler Junior High School - LGi Room - 10865 SW Walnut,
,
TigardOregon.
r. i;
2. ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: vice President Moen, CommissionersButler, Owens, Fyre a
and Peterson.
ABSENT: Commissioner Vanderwood, Leverett, Tepedino, and Edina
STAFF Director of Planning & Development Bill' Monahan;
Associate Planner Keith Liden; Associate Planner �
Elizabeth Newton; Secretary Diane M. Jelderks.
3. Minutes from` April 3, 1984 were considered. Commissioner Owens asked that
on Page 7 hat the first sentence be clarified to reflect that high ¢
density had been approved. F
o Commissioner Fyre moved to approve minutes as amended'.
�V Commissioner Peterson seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION:
o P_ letter was received from Commissioner Edin regarding. item 5.3.
j
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.1 SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 1-84 Oak Hill. Investment NP0 #4
A request by Oak Hill Development Corp. for approval of a sign code
exception to allow a second free standing sign for a proposed shopping
center where only one is nemitted on property zoned C.G. (Commercial
cific
General) located on the northwest corner of SW 78th Avenue and SW , 1100,
Hwy. , Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map JS1 36CD, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300,
1200, and 1300).
Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval with two
conditions. He noted the NPO had reviewed and had no problem with the
exception.
APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Jerry Foy, Oak Hill, ` supported staff's
recommendation.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o No one appeared to speak:
APRIL 17, 1984
PAGE 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
_-
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
L o Discussion regarding size and number of signs-
0 Commissioner Moen wanted to be assured the approval would be for the
restaurant only and not another business that would move in later.
o Commissioner Butler moved for approval of SCE 1-84 with the following
conditions:
1. Two freestanding signs will be allowed for the shopping center,
including the restaurant.
2. The signs shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Director prior to issuance of building permits.
3. The approval for the second free standing sign shall be for the
restaurant only.
"o commissioner: Owens seconded. Motion carried unanimously. _
5.2 SUBDIVISION S 6-84 W.L. & Bertina Sawyer/CECIL BOONE PARK NPO #5
Request for preliminary subdivision plat approval for a 20 lot development
on a 2.37- acre -parcel zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) located on
the northwest corner of Durham Road and 81st Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax'Map 2S1
€ 12CC, Tax Lots 1800 and 1802).
Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation noting concerns of the
Public Works Department. Staff recommended approval, conditioned on
resolving issues of concern.
NPO COMMENTS - Debra Naubert, 14365 SW 80th - NPO #5 Chairperson. The NPO
had concerns for houses abutting Durham Road, suggested some type of sound
buffer. Another issue was the traffic flow.
APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION - Ryan O'Brian, 1134 S.E. 23rd .Ave., Hillsboro,
responded to the traffic issue and public improvements. He requested
changing 24 ft. to 18 ft. on condition number One.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o Edward Cotter, 8065 SW Durham Rd., was concerned about the vacation
of SW 81st and what this would mean-
CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTLE
o .Discussion followed between applicant and Commissioners regarding
street improvements.
o Discussion between staff and Commissioners regarding vacating of SW
81st.
o Dorothy Gage, adjoining property owner, expressed her concern for
decreasing pavement from 24 to 18 ft. Discussion followed.
PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 17, 1984
o Discussion regarding City's ,'policy on half-street improvements
( Further discussion on street improvements.
o Dorothy Gage wanted to go on record that she did not want to have to
make acommitment:because of adjoining property'developing.
o Further discussion between staff and NPO #5`: chairperson regarding
access`.and egress onto Durham Road.
o Mr. Peterson questioned what would happen to lot 5 if the street
would 'go through. Discussion followed.
o Commissioners and staff discussed the `half street improvements at
length.
o Commissioner Moen asked if Mrs. Gage would object to letting the
developer 'put 7 ft. of pavement on her property. She felt this was
an encroachment on her property and did not want it. Discussion
followed,
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED'
o Commissioner Peterson felt lots 4, ;5, and 6 should be adjusted. He
was concerned that the City was not clear about;public improvements.
o Commissioner Butler did not support a non-remonstrance. He felt SW k
81st shouldgo through or be dedicated. He did not feel developer 3
should pave 24 ft. to the north. Discussion followed.
t
o Commissioner Fyre supported Commissioner Butler's comments.
fi
o Commissioner Owens wanted to see the 81st Street issue resolved.
Also the setback issue had not been discussed. There was also
concern about ingress and egress on Durham from 81st, and the
condition of Durham Road.
o Commissioner Moen supported having 81st going through,
o Ryan O'Brien interjected how difficult it would be if the street was
opened.
o Staff recommended item be tabled until May 8th meeting to give them
opportunity to resolve issues of concern.
4
o Commissioner Butler moved to table S 6-84 until the May 8, 1984
meeting to allow staff, State Highway, and applicant to resolve issue
regarding SW 81st. ,
o Commissioner Poen added that lots 4, 5 and 6 might need adjusting.
He also had a concern for any half street improvements. He felt Bond ,
Street should go straight through. ,
o Commissioner Owens suggested adding to the motion that staff Vencourage the property owners to negotiate so street improvements
rV
could be made on property to the north.
LPAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 17, 1984
.:.
f ,
o Commissioner Butler agreed to add to his motion.
t
Commissioner Peterson seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
5.3 SUBDIVISION S 7-84 VARIANCE V 7-84 Century 21 Properties/SHADOW PARK-NPO Cpl
A request for preliminary` subdivision plat approval of ' a 67 lot>
development and a variance to the yard requirements of the R-12
(Residential, 12 units/acre)` zone ' to allow a 5 foot side yard and a 15'
foot rear yard 'where ' 10 and 20- feet respectively are required. The
property ,is located at 9125 SW O'Mara 'Street, Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map
2S1-2DB Tax Lots 400 and 500).
Associate Planner Liden reviewed- the ,applicant's proposal and letters
submitted by Paul Johnson, Phil Edin and Willene Ettestad. He explained
that;a sensitive land permit,would` be required as a-condition, of approval.
NPO COMMENTS - J B Bishop speaking as an individual member of 'NFO #1
supported staff's recommendation. He stated they wanted access to the park
APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Mike Fain, Century 21 Properties, Inc.,
respo;.ided to the Sensitive Land issues. He was concerned about J B;
Bishop's comment regarding access to the park. His understanding from the
recent NPO #1 .meeting wasthat they wanted the access closed. He reviewed
the traffic circulation, and addressed concerns which had been raised at
the previous hearing. He agreed to the conditions placed by staff as long
as condition one didn't include both the bikepath and sidewalks.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o Larry Saub, Burnham Ct. and Hill gt. - stated he had attended NPO
Ws meeting. It was the consensus of the NPO and individuals
present to eliminate the park access.
o Willene Ettestad, 9130 SW O'Mara, would like bikepath on south side
of the street.
o Gloria Johnson, 9700 SW Hill, was concerned about the park access
which would increase traffic problems in the residential area.
CROSS EXAM AND REBUTTAL
o Discussion regarding moving bikepath and the affect it would have.
o Staff's cormnented that the Public Works Director preferred having
bikepath on the north side. Discussion followed.
o Butler questioned City's policy regarding dedicating open space
areas. Discussion followed.
o Lengthy discussion regarding alignment of the streets.
PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 17, 1984
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
° COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION:
o Commissioner Fyre concerned with access to park. Supported
bikepath on south side of street.
o Consensus was for bikepath to be constructed on the south side of the
street.'
-o Commissioner Moen wanted to see Lake Street finished off. He felt
Hill zStreet needed access to the ,,park =and that it should be well
lighted and paved. This access ralso' should be dedicated to the
City. Lengthy discussion followed.
`-o Commissioner- Butler moved to approve S. 7-83 and 'V 7-84 modifying
condition number One byadeleting',bike lane and adding bikepath to be
constructed on the south side of the street. Modifying condition
number' 5 to include pedestrian access between lots 54 and 55, and
dedicating designated floodplain to the City as park. Also adding
the following conditions: 11.. Parking spaces shall be provided on
the horseshoe. 12. No structures shall' be built in the designated
floodplain. 13. ,Open 'Space adjacent to 56-65 (Western Revine) shall
be incorporated into these lots with deed restrictions to leave as
open .;.pace in natural 'state for buffering. 14. Finish off end of
Lake Street.' 15. Access area to be well lighted. 16. Site barrier
should be installed to Planning Director's approval at southern end
of the property.
o Commissioner Moen seconded. Motion failed, Commissioners Owens, Fyre
and Peterson voting no.
o Commissioner Butler moved for approval of S 7-83 and V 7-84 with the f
following conditions:
e
1. Standard minor collector half-street improvements including
sidewalks, curbs, and street lights shall be provided along the
O'Mara Street frontage, A pedestrian bikepath will be
constructed on south side of O'Mara.
2. Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction
plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped
by a registered civil engineer, detailing all proposed public
improvements shall be submitted to the City's Engineering
Division for review.
3. Construction" of proposed public improvements' shall not commence
until after the Engineering Division has issued approved public
improvement plans (the Division will require posting of a 100%
performance bond), the payment of a permit fee and a sign
installation/streetlight deposit. Also, the execution of a
street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall
occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved
public improvement plans.
PAGE, 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 17, 1984
4. An additional 10 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated along
the O'Mara Street :frontage to increase the right-of-way ,width
from centerline to 30 feet.
5. The undeveloped portion of the property that is within the
100-year floodplain, shall be designated as floodplain and
dedicated to the City as park.
6. A Sensitive Lands Permit shall be obtained prior to submission
of the final plat.
7. The setback restrictions of the R-7 zone shall apply to the
portion of the development which is zoned R-12 (PD).
8. The subdivision shall contain a maximum of 67 lots.
9. Necessary survey work shall comply with the following:
a. Vertical Datum shall be City of Tigard (N.G.S. 1929).
All existing and : established (temporary) bench marks in
the vicinity of the project shall be shown on the
construction drawing.
b. Compliance of 18.160.160 (all). with the following
exceptions:
�..: 18.160.160 A.'L
t
Capped 5/8" X 30" Iron Rods on surface of final lift will
be acceptable.
NOTE
18.160.160 B.1
City of Tigard Primary Control Surveys (CS. # 19,947 & 20,223)
Local-Ground coordinates exist for all stations. State plane
coordinates not required. City can make transformation given
local coordinates.
C. Compliance of 18.160.190 (B)
d. All storm and sanitary lines shall be placed in positions
that DO NOT interfere with centerline monumentation.
10. This approval is valid for the period of one year from the final
decision date.
11. Ten parking spaces shall be provided on the horseshoe.
12. No structures shall be constructed in designated floodplain.
13. Open Space adjacent to 56-65 (Western Revine) shall be
incorporated into these lots with deed restriction to leave open
space in natural state for buffering.
PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION PIINUTES - APRIL 17, 1984
14. `Finish off end of Lake Street.
4
15. Site barrier should be installed to Planning Director's approval
at southern end of property.
16. Eliminate 25' easement between 54 and 55, and install drainage
underground.
o Commissioner Peterson seconded. Motion carried. Commissioner Owers
and Moen voting No.
5.4 ZONE CHANGE ZC 6-84 'HISTORIC OVERLAY DESIGNATIONS
Associate` Planner Newton <made 'staff's recommendation to assign Historic
Designation to the requested properties. She stated the owners were
notified and no one had objected.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o No one appeared to speak.
PUBLIC.`HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
o Commissioner Owens moved for approval of ZC 6-84.
`- Commissioner Butler seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
5.5 CPA 3-84 FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY
Associate Planner Newton reviewed two alternative methods to address this
issue. Discussion followed.
o Staff recommended redrawing lines as proposed in alternative number
two.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o No one appeared to speak.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
o Discussion followed regarding redrawing the line.
o Commissioner Owens moved to forward recommendation of approval for
alternative number two to City Council.
Commissioner Fyre seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 17, 1984
,4
5.6 CPA 9-84 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE DEFINITIONS
Associate Planner Newton reviewed definition which staff is recommending
be incorporated into the code. Discussion followed.
NPO COMMENTS - Phil Pastoris, NPO #6 Chairman, commented that the
definition for "Story, half" was unclear; even if it had been taken from
the 'Uniform;Building Code.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION'
o Commissioner Butler moved to forward recommendation of approval for
CPA 9-84 to City Council adding "or external" to the Remodel
definition.
Commissioner Peterson seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
5.7 CPA 10-84 CHANGES TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
Associate Planner Newton reviewed changes being proposed.'
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o J B Bishop, 10505 SW Barbur Raised concern on Item III-288.
18.150.020 C, as being unclear. Staff stated they would add "except
for B above.11
o Mary Clinton, 9865 SW View Court - Raisedconcern with deleting
III-157, section 18-96.090 and recommended adding it to Section
18.98.030.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
o Consensus of Commission was to remove Item 1II-157, from the changes.
oCommissioner Butler moved to forward recommendation of approval to
City Council, with the exception of Item 1II-157.
Commissioner Peterson seconded.
Motion carried with Commissioner Owens abstaining.
PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 17, 1984
5.8 'through 5.12
o Commissioner Butler moved to set over items 5.8 through 5.12 to the
May 8, 1984 hearing.
Commissioner Peterson seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
6. Meeting adjourned at 12:40 A.M.
' Diane M. Jelderks, ,Secretary
ATTEST:
A. Donald Moen: Vice Pres.
(DJ:br/0421P)
PAGE 9 PLANNING C01414ISSION MINUTES APRIL 17, 1984
a
91
4
Place under City of Tigard Logo
VARIANCE V 8-84 JOE AND L.DCILLE BORSCH NPO # 2
The Planning Director has approved with conditions a Variance to allow a
5—foot rear yard setback where 15 feet is required and to reduce the side yard
setback from 5 to 4 feet in the R-4.5- (Residential, 4.5 units/acre) zone on
property located at 9935 SW Johnson Street, Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map-2S1 2BA,
Tax Lot ,2100)`.
The adopted <finding of facts, decision and statement of conditions : can be
obtained from the 'Planning Department, Tigard City ,Hall, `<12755 SW Ash, P.O.
Box 23397, Tigard,; Oregon 97223. The decision shall be rinal on May 11,
1984• Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with
section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code,
which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice
is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is May 11, 1984. The
hearing,on an appeal will be De Novo.
_ J
r 1 - N9QN
TT Publish 5/1/84
0288P dm j
f
F ,
Place under City of Tigard Logo
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 8-84 VARIANCE V 9-84 GEORGE KILLIAN NPO # 5
The Planning 'Director has approved with conditions a Site Development Review
and Variance to construct a commercial center and to increase the 10 percent
maximum square footage allowance for convenience stores and eating and
drinking establishments to 15 percent and <20 percent respectively. The
property is zoned I-P (Industrial Park) and is located southwest of; the SW
Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW; 72nd Avenue intersection, Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax
Map 2S1 12DC, 'Tax Lots 700, 800, 900 and 1000).
The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement of conditions can be
obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, ;12755SW .Ash, P.O.
Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on May 11,
1984. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with
section 18.32.290(A) and .section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code,
which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice
is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is`may`11, 1984. The
hearing on an appeal will be De Novo.
12
IF
-- r 13
TT Publish 5/1/84
0288P dmj
i
V
E i
I
Place Under City of Tigard Logo
£E
HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT: HOP 3-84 HAROLD & JULENE CARLSON NPO # 3
The Planning Director has approved a Home Occupation Permit to ;operate a
Residential Rome'for ;the handicapped on property zoned R-1 located at 14615 SW i.
Hazeltree (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2SI ,IOBO lot 600).
The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement :of conditions can be
obtained from the Planning 'Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O.
Box 23397,'' Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on May 11,
1984. Any party to the decision may appeal this 'decision in accordance with
section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code,
which provides that 6.written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice '
# is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is May 11,° 1984.: The
hearing on an appeal will be De Novo.
L, f
_J I so wc,pNL o.8L� CL T _
so r us"r n so iL o —+—
ST
- TT Publish May ,1, 1984
I
1 SEEM-
i
Place Under City of Tigard Oregon
r
VARIANCE V 8-84 PETE JANZEN NPO # 6
! The Director of Planning and Development has approved a request for a variance
F
to locate 'a private driveway within 20 'feet of an intersection were 30 feet is it
required on property 'Zaned R-4.5,'(Residential, 4.5` units/acre) located on the
southwest cornerof SFJ 98th Court and SW Janzen Court, Tigard (Washington Co.
Tax Map 2s1 11BA, Tax Lot 3200)•
The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement of conditions can be r}
obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash,. P.O. p
Box 23397,' Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall i be final on May 14, , s
1984 Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance' with
section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code, '
which provides that a written appeal may be 'filed within 10 days after notice '
is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is May 14, 1984. The
'
hearing on an appeal will be De Novo.
-.
I i I
iESR Sf Cr' -
J M
-TT Publish May 3, 1984
1
Place Under City of Tigard Logo
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 7-84 Oak Hill Development Corp. NPO # 4
The Planning ,Director has approved a Site Development Review with conditions
for a retailshoppi.ng center and related improvements on property zoned C-G
(Commercial General) located on the northwest corner of SW 78th Avenue and ,SW
Pacific Highway, Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 '36CD, Tax 'Lots 100, 200, 300,
1100. 1200, and 1300).
The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement of conditionscan be
obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.A,
Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on May 21,
1984. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with
section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code,
which provides that a written 'appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice
is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is May 18, 1984. The
hearing;on an appeal will be De Novo.
ac-y Lam;
TT publish 5-8-84
0288P
Place Under City of Tigard Logo
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 6-84 Gary Durham (Hampton Oaks Office Park) NPO #4
The Planning Director has approved a Site Development Review with conditions
to establish an office building and related facilities on property zoned C-P
(Commercial Professional) located 'west of 66thAvenue between Hampton Street
and Gonzaga Street 'right-of-way (Wash. Co. Tax:Map 2S1 IAD, Tax Lots 800, 900,
1000, 1400, 1500, 1600, ,'1700, 4000, and 4100).
The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement of conditions can be
obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, '12755 Std Ash, P.O.
Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 37223. The decision shall be final on May 21,
1984. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with
section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the "Community Development code,
which provides that a written ;appeal may filed within 10 days after notice
is given and sent. The `deadline for filing of an appeal is May 18, 1984. The
hearing on an appeal will be De Novo.
e
/ Y ( 9�r-E�/iJ I iRAMR I Sip
1,
W� T-
r;
r
r f-
' 1. _
J PHIL.
�8
LEWIS r
k LsEK
SW M PT I�
NET[
TT publish May 8, 1984
(0288P)
' r
-, Place Under City of Tigard Oregon
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 16-83 TIME OIL CO. NPO # 5
The Director of Planning and Development has approved a request to replace an
existing service station with a convenience store/service station on property
zoned I--L (Light Industrial) located at 15900 SW Upper Boones FerryRoad,
Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12a, tax lot 1800).
The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement of conditions can be
obtained'' from the -Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O.
Box 23397, Tigard, 'Oregon 97223. The decision shall be 'final on May 21,
1984. Any party to: the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with
section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code,
which provides ithat 'a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after 'notice
is given and sent. The deadline for 'filing of an appeal is May 21, 1984. The
hearing on an 'appeal will be Der Novo.
"
" !
t m
r_ w
TT Publish May 10, 1984
AM
a
A U
44
0 CM ..1
U �t sa
{ D
i
x
j
co
ri
r
P. c
w
Pd Da ca
Fa
Cx7 M Cs
0 0 .
Hato
® �
a .� M .
rAg0
4111
O €.
Q w Q4 Caa
Q A Q, 44 U4 '
6nti co CIS
ad 46),
ps
us d C
y4 p @s r1 r4 ►i
w in
W Ga
0 1 A ja
�1 Kin tJ €3 C7 62si
b CS 87 U
d
to 43 43.
as
m
Iad -
Q
1-4 VALit6 da
' ' ` a 0 ,,
b b -0
d d a a d
w bo 60
w r 4)
M 6 a l rd
� r1 ri r•1
rFia� lu w w v v o v v
w
•0 d
a.
o v
N d
co w co 0
OD I
I ++ F
Q 6 d O C O
pw co
m Q @ C
a d ® .N ,� S O
w 9 - u w bti .� . H N
N o u 6+ U N a d d 0 :.� 9
.++ d d •.+..I 60 'O aC ed 6 w
L. Y +l .il ci d G) cc W
RL al .+a O C
R F •V .0 q O O w c0 ®0 60 w
b v d a 'a w P S cl e c e a a
I O d P d 1 d'O d d a +l •+
rs rl :..+ al x4 04
C - Ci.0 C 1 C O O O - C �+ d a d 'd d r
U V W 0. 4L A. 96
o
CL
(` x
RS m w w m. w m w w
F ml
ca w
m
0'a W In
w Q W ct sP 0 c C a V A
C0 ^? com w dl M oo W OD 6 00 Go
I co 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 0D 1 1
t0 fiO O 1 to .n. an .O t0 n O B •9 1 O n
0.S F U N 0. N N N N N r� N r-1 N W rl r1
Q 05 F1' Pl V C .? d Q •P Q M ri Q � +T
in
A to x ..0+
U M 9.
ri
rtS S.1 00 rA Hf 9. Is
w V2
C2 w
pOi C 0+ L LI.. to n .W
axi .Ci g w '0 .!L rSi c w C O C a
N S P B6 !9
N r+ h O F H
91
w O m O 0 W
O
94
a o in o Is o o u u
6 O ill W co S0 w w O C
►CD w G .6N, : 0 � "' 93 a rl
H M EA d 60 rv4 d rl 60 a+
U 4 O H fA '.l w w W toJ O O 0v 0D �l
r
�i
F
b -
O
U
00 W 00 OD CD co 00� '.10
e i i^t N N N lV t'f �
d
C
O
-0J N pod g O Vl rl
0 1
C4 w
IA i!1 re 0 Y m'b (O
ClU 4
r•� N W 11S M H 4J as i.
d ..
V t
trt. ho 00o f
- 9j v
r�i Pf d ems.! 93 •N N ri -
5
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Members of the City Council May 16, 1984
FROM William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development
SUBJECT: Economic Development Committee Report
This is the second< report concerning the activities of our Economic
Development Committee. The Committee met on April 18, 1984.
Attached for your information is a copy of the minutes for this meeting as
well as the revised survey which will be circulated to Tigard Businesses. The
revisions ;were suggested by the Committee in April. The mailing should take #
place prior to May 22.
6
I
f
encl. : minutes j
survey 1
j
0444P l
dmf
L
j
}
_ F
TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF 'APRIL '18, 1984
7:30 A.M. , PIONEER PIES RESTAURANT
Members Present: Bruce P. Clark, Chairman; Jim Corliss; Robert Williams;
Amo DeBernardis; Patrick ' Kennedy; Bob Nunn;; Tony
Orlandini; Mark Padgett; and William Monahan, -ex-officer. '
Others Present: Geraldine Ball; Anita Edin; Nancy Campbell, and Tom Brian.
The minutes of the March`- 14, 1984, ' meeting were reviewed and approved as
written.
Chairman ' Bruce Clark introduced the newest member of the committee, Bob
Williams of Pacific Realty;Associates, representing the 72nd Avenue Area.
Bruce then initiated discussion on goals and "objectives of the committee.
Bili reviewed , the suggestions submitted by committee members which were
r developed on a flip chart. Discussion centered on specific topics which the
committee should get involved in as well as general goals and objections.
After much discussion concerning the preparations of background materials,
comparison of Tigard to other communities in terms of business costs and
approval periods, various roles for the committee to play, and the type of
growth which the committee should promote, the Committee voted on a goal and
objections.
Mark Padgett made a motion, seconded by Jim Corliss that the following be
adopted as the goal and objectives of the Economic Development Committee:
Goal Promote economic development for the good of the
community.
Objectives 1) Identify the advantages and barriers to development
in Tigard and recommend changes.
2) Develop an economic development strategy.
The committee unanimously approved the motion adopting the goal and
objectives. The committee may expand on these as it becomes more familiar
with Tigard's advantages and disadvantages for development.
A discussion then took place on the initial survey results from the sample
mailing. Nine of fifty surveys were returned. The committee suggested
several modifications to the form which will be incorporated prior to a
general mailing in late April. The general mailing will be accompanied by a
letter from Bruce and a copy of the Tigard Fact Sheet now being published.
The surveys which are addressed to ten local businesses will be held out from
the mailing. The committee members agreed that each will take a survey form
to a business firm chosen by staff to meet with a company representative and
complete the survey.
Prior to the next meeting ,Sill will revise and circulate the survey and begin
to 'assemble some data and publications for committee members.
The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 16, 1984, at 7:30 A.M. at
Pioneer Pies.
s
1
.....µ F,.4.3.�.._.
Y - w
5
{
j
S
E
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, ,OREGON
TO Tigard Businesses
FROM: Bruce Clark, Chairman, Tigard Economic Development Committee
DATE: May '7, 1984
SUBJECT: Economic Development Survey
Tigard's recently formed Economic Development Committee is interested in
learning from you, a member of the business community, about the positive and
negative features of the community. We hope to receive input from the long
established as well as the new businesses concerning why they chose Tigard,
what the advantages of doing business are, what the disadvantages are, and
what improvements the City should make to City programs which affect business.
As chairman of the Committee, I urge you to take a moment to complete the
enclosed survey and return it to the City. Your input will be analysed along
with the other returns and presented to the Committee. We then will use this
information in formulating our recommendations for improvements to the City's
delivery of information and services to firms which desire to remain in,
expand in, or move to Tigard.
Thank you for your assistance.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
a
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SURVEY
Name of Company: (Optional)
Address:
Nature of Business
Number of Employees`:
1. How long has your company been located at your present site? `
2. Why did your company,choose your present site to operate your :business?
A. Closeness to other firms which we do business with.
B. Transportation opportunities '
C. Labor force
D. Existing building was suitable
E. Schools
F. Other Please specify
t
A. What are the advantages of being in the City of Tigard?
A. Location
B. Local tax rate
C. City services
D. Employees
E. Other Please specify
B. What are the disadvantages of being in the City?
A. Local tax rate
B. County tax rate _
C. Other Please specify
3. If you have had occasion to deal with City personnel in the development,
expansion, or remodel of your facility, generally what are your feelings?
A. The City assisted the company to meet its goals.
a
B. _ City procedures were too time consuming, costly, or prohibitive.
C. The City staff were uncooperative.
D. Other
f
4. If you had a 'positive experience working with the staff, what do you think
rc' are the characteristics of , the staff or the approval process which
encourage economic development and/or assisted you?
What improvements would you suggest?
5. If you had a negative experience working with the staff, what were the
problems which you encountered?
Y:
What was the effect of these problems?
s
What changes do you suggest for the improvement of the development process?
6. What improvements are needed in your general area which would assist your i.
business? (For instance: street improvements, traffic controls, or other
public improvements?)
l°
7. What suggestions do you have which would assist the Economic Development
Committee in its 'efforts to develop an economic development strategy? To
attract new businesses?
8. What specific actions should the Committee take to bring new business to
Tigard?
9. Would you or a representative of your company; like to be kept informed of
the Committee's efforts and progress? If you would like to assist the
Committee please indicate your interest.
10. Do you plan to enlarge your present facility in the next few years?
Yes No If so, will you be looking for a new site in
Tigard outside of Tigard, but in the area
outside the area? ?
How much land would you be looking for?
What site characteristics will be important?
Thank you for your assistance in completing this survey. Please return the
survey to:
William A. Monahan
Director of. Planning & Development
City of Tigard, Oregon
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, OR 97223
PLEASE RETURN BY JUNE 4, 1984
(WAM:pm/0424P)
op-agEmmma Am Law Am r=-E�i04MM
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
APRIL, 1984
TO: City Administrator/City Council
FROM: Chief of Police
I. Personnel:
The department is down one from full strength, with only 28 employees. We
are in the process of recruiting a dispatcher to fill this vacancy. `
The average daily department strength was 17.6 as compared to 16.6 of
April`, 1983. By division, the breakdwon is as follows: Administration 2.0;
Services Division, 4.0; Patrol Division 8.2; Traffic Division 1.3; and
Investigative Division 2.1.
II. -Service Delivery:
The-department responded to 624 non-criminal calls for service this month'
in contrast to; 537 calls in 1983; year-to-date 2,594.
Patrol Division's obligated time was 2001.7 hours vs. 513.3 hours of non
obligated time.
4
III. Crime:
There were 89 Part I crimes reported this month; 101 were reported in April
last year. Of the Part I crimes reported, 45 were cleared, or 50.6%. The
department responded to .71 Part II crimes and 52 were cleared. There were
68 persons charged this month as compared to 79 for this same time period'
€ last year. Part I crimes decreased 13.5% this month over April of 1983.
The Investigative Division worked 28 active cases this month; and cleared
25, or 89.3% of the active cases.
The property loss was $53,449, and $4,386 was recovered, or 8.2%.
IV. Traffic:
Patrol Division responded to 31 accidents, of that number 5 were injury.
There were 407 citations issued, as compared to 265 for this same time
period last year. In addition, 381 warnings were given. The enforcement
index was 49.60.
V. Police Reserves:
The Reserve Unit worked 194 hours this month assisting the department in
policing the community. The majority of this time was spent out in the
community on patrol and assisting citizens.
See attached monthly report from the Reserves for a complete breakdown of
their activities.
VI. Training:
A. On April 13, Dispatcher Crow attended an 8 hour class on 11The Dispatcher Your Role in Officer Survival." This class was BPST certified, and was held
in Springfield.
VII. Special Programs;
(See attached reports for breakdown of activity on each program listed).
A. Motorcycle Activity
B. Alarm and Permit Recap
VIII. Community Relations:
A. OniApril 9, Officer Grisham spent 1 hour with two 8th graders, giving a
departmental tour and presentation. :
B. On April '10, Grisham and Goldspink spent 2 man hours at the High School,
interviewing 3 seniors to determine winner of TPOA scholarship fund.
C. On April ll, Grisham contacted 160 seniors at the High School, spending
7 hours talking to' them' during their senior rap day.
D. Grisham contacted 40 pre-schoolers from the Tigard Co-Op Preschool, giving F
them the Officer Friendly presentation on April 12. He spent l hour.
E. On April 18, Grisham presented a drug talk ;to 25 adults at the Kiwanis
.luncheon, spending l hour.
F. On April 24, Grisham spent 8 hours talking to 300 sophomores at the High
r .
School, giving them information on rape and child abuse.
G. Crime Watch Steering Committee. On April 6 and again on April 27, Chief
i
Adams, Lt. Wheeler and Cpl. Johnson met with this committee, spending a total
of 12 man hours and contacting approximately 20 people.
H. On April 12, Chief Adams spent 2 hours giving information to the Mayor
and Council candidates.
I. " Chief Adams and 5 other Chiefs of Police met in Tigard on April 20, for
their monthly meeting.
J. Capt. Jennings attended an FBI National Academy luncheon in Beaverton on
April 6.
K. On April 24, Capt. Jennings taught a class at the Police Academy on
microcomputer programs management. There were 41 students, and he spent 2
hours.
Respectfully,
R.B. Adams
Chief of Police
F
ti< -
VII. Special Programs:
(See attached reports for breakdown of activity on each program listed).
A. Motorcycle Activity !
B. Alarm and Permit Recap t
VIII. Community Relations:
A. On April 9, Officer Grisham spent-' 1 hour with two 8th graders, giving a
departmental tour and presentation. I
B. On April 10, Grisham and Goldspink spent 2 man hours at the High School,
interviewing 3 seniors to determine winner of TPOA scholarship fund.
RJf _
C. On April 11, Grisham contacted'. 160 seniors at the High School, spending g
7 hours talking to them during their,senior rap ;day.
D. Grisham contacted 40 pre-schoolers from the Tigard Co-Op Preschool, giving
them the Officer Friendly presentation on April 12. He spent 1 hour. '
E. On April 18, Grisham presented a drug talk to 25 adults at the Kiwanis '
luncheon, spending ';l hour.
k
F. On April 24, Grisham spent 8 hours talking to 300 sophomores at the High
School, giving them information on rape and child abuse. gr
G. Crime Watch Steering Committee. On April 6 and again on April 27, Chief ,
Adams, Lt. Wheeler and Cpl. Johnson met with this committee, spending a total
of 12 man hours and contacting approximately 20 people. e
_ 4
H. On April 12,- Chief Adams spent 2 hours giving information to the Mayor F'
and Council candidates. j
I. Chief Adams and 5 other Chiefs of Police met in Tigard on April 20, for t
their monthly meeting. ;
J. Capt. Jennings attended an FBI National Academy luncheon in Beaverton on
.April 6.
K. On April 24, Capt. Jennings taught a class at the Police Academy on
micro computer programs management. There were 41 students, and he spent 2
hours.
4� Respectfully,
R.B. Adams '
Chief of Police
M
a� M
r—
o®
qTj��`/D
O/�F�FD
OZ
RT
ON
3
UST
c t
Z,gss�o°M
r _
Q/s'°gTci N/NG
/c
GO F
I IA
IAI
/ST s
spe,,
N
el4j,
i
q=
hy=
4
�s
�3
Q
17 N
a5"4. �dt
iO
4
®re. OR
a
�� r
r
� s
A��
s
PP.
RW
a , �
ee.
z
3
OUR
i -
CITY OF TIGARD ?
r
MEMORANDUM c
TO: Chief of Police`
FROM: Sgt`. Newman
SUBJECT: Monthly Report for April, 1984
{
RE: Motorcycle Traffic Unit Report E.
M1,
r f
During the month of April, 1984 there were 31 accidents, 5 injury, 26 non.-
injury. This is'a decrease over April, 1983 which had 36 accidents, 10 injury,
26 non-injury. `
Of the 31 accidents this month, 21 were investigated by the Traffic Unit.
Enforcement index this month is 49.60 compared to 19.90 for the same
period last year. z
The traffic unit issued 119'hazardous, '43 non-hazardous citations for a total
of 162.
f
f
k
I 14W smog=
ALARMS AND PERMIT RE-CAP
Month of APRIL, 1984
January 1 -'April`30, 1984
THIS SAME MONTH °% TOTAL TOTAL
MONTH I LAST YEAR CHANGE. THIS YEAR LAST YEAR CHANGE
TOTAL ALARMS... . . S5 80 - 45% 172 134 + 28%
a. False....... 54 78 - 44% 166 126 + 32%
b. Bonaf de..., 1 2 - 50% 6 8 - 33%
Permits Issued. ... 10 6 + 67% 29 26 + 12%
Permits Renewed..'. 2 -- -- 19 --
Permit Fees. .. .. .. $125 $85 + 47% -$575 $470 + 22%
Permits Revoked. . 3 7 - 33% 33%
9 12
Revoked Fees.. .... $240 1180 + 33% $820 $365`, + 55%
MONTHLY SUMMARY STATEMENT:
Another significant decrease in false alarms for the month.
There is a noted increase in total false alarms for 1984 compared to 1983.
_However, the increase in alarm systems has increased also.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY'REPORT
FOR
({ MONTH OF APRIL 1984 f'
DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL
AVERAGE _
NUPIERICAL STRENGTH DAILY ABSENCE �� AVERAGE EE'FE_t-_I'IVE SI4?ENf,tE(-
;
End of Same This Same This Last y Same '
this Month Month Month i� Month Month Month
Month Last Last Last '
Year Year Year
TOTAL PERSONNEL 28 28 10.4 11.4 17.6 18.5 16.6
A
CHIEF'S OFFICE 3 3 1.0 1.6' 2.0 2.0 14
SERVICES DIVIS. ' 6 7 2.0 2.7 4.0 4,.5 4.3
PATROL DIVISION 14 13 5.8 4.5 8.2 8.7 8.5
TRAFFIC DIVIS. 2 2 .7 .8 � 1.3 1.3 1.2
INVEST. SECTION 3 3 1.9 1.0 2.1 1.9 1.9
FORCE ONE 13 13 4.6 5.3" 8.4 8.8 _ 7.7 }
FORCE TWO 8 8 2.9 2.9 5.1 5.1 5•I _
-ACE THREE7 7 2.9 3.2 4.1 s 4.6 .8
--t
CHANGES IN PERSONNEL s DAILY AVERAGE PATROL STRENGTH
1. Present for duty end of last month 29 iThis Same Month
2. Recruited during month p Month Last Year
r 3. Reinstated during month 0 1. Total number. field
• officers 16 15
Total. to account for 29 2. Less Agents Assig {
4. Separations from the service: ned to Investigat. 0 0
4
(a) Voluntary resignation 1 3. Average daily abs-
(b) Retirement
ences of field off-
(a)
iters owing to:
(c) Resigned with charges pgnding (a) Vacation, cusp-
(d) Dropped during probation ension, day_ off,
---- comp. time, etc. 5.7 5.1
(e) Dismissed for cause (b) Sick & Injured 1 .1
(f) Killed in line of duty _ (c) Schools, etc. •7 1
(g) Deceased Total average daily
absences 6.5 5.3 _
Total separations 1 0.5 9.7
4. Available for duty
5. Present for duty at end of month 28 -
u
TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT
'Monthly Report
I, Calls for Service: This Month 1,216 Year to Date 5,012
e^" ,13.3
A. Obligated Time 2001.7 B. Non-Obligated Time
II. PART I CRIMES %
No. Cleared Arrests
A. Homicide
B. Rape 1
C. Robbery 4 1
2 1 1
D. Assault20 E. Burglary` 35 22 18
F, Larceny 47
G. Auto Theft _ --
H. Arson --'-T-'�
TO AI.S 89 45 25
III. PART II TOTALS :; 71 52 43
TOTAL Para I and II
160 97 68
IV. TOTAL PERSONS CHARGED: `' 68 -
a. Adult Male 36 _ C. Juvenile Male 13
by Adult Female 11 d. Juvenile Female 8
V. WARRANTS SERVED 7
VI. TOTAL PROPERTY LOSS $ 53,444 TOTAL PROPERTY RECOVERED.$4,386
VII. TRAFFIC
a. Accidents Investigated 31 Injury Accidents 5 Fatal—0
b. Citations; VBR (Speeding) 51 Yield Right of Way 10
Following too Close 3 Red Light 50 Stop Sign 32
Improper Turn 12 Reckless Driving-1—
Careless
riving1Careless Driving 7-0 Driving Under the Influence 10
Driving While Suspended 18 Other Hazardous. 51
Non-Hazardous 159 Total Hazardous _ 248
c. Enforcement Index 49.60
d. Traffic Enforcement Totals
Citations: This Month This Year 407 Year to Date 1770
This Month Last Year 265 Lasa Year. to Date 1167
Warning, : This Month This Year 381- Year to Date 1533
This Month Last Year I Last Year to Date 61
NOTE: - Part I Crimes (Major Crimes) Clearance Rate 50.6%
,c Part IT Crimes (Minor Crimes) Clearance Rate 73.27 -�
f !
TO: Mayor pro tem & Council May 17, 1984
FROM: John Hagman, Supt. Engineering Div.
SUBJECT: Monthly Report - April, 1984
I. EXISTING STREET RE-CONDITIONING PROGRAM'
A. No progress on the final drafting and costing of the Franklin Street
improvement project.
B. Continued assistance in the design, computations and preparation of
legal descriptions for ;the S.W. O'Mara Street improvement project.
II. COLLECTOR STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENTATION PROGRAM
Proposals were received from three (3) professional land surveying
consultants for the completion of 'S.W. 72nd Avenue -(Hwy. 99W to Hwy.
217). A selection will be coming shortly. It should be noted that the
county will be re-monumenting -four (4) 'government corners needed to
e
complete this project.
III. CONTROLNETWORK PROGRAM
- Bill Beckley and myself attended a workshop on "Geographic Information
Systems". The workshop was very enlightening as to the many applications
(computer, records, etc.) available in managing a data base.
Approximately 20% of this month was spent in routine maintenance and
extension of the control network.
IV. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PROJECTS
Minor drafting revisions were needed for the S.W. 68th San. Sewer
project. We are currently ready to stake this project when construction
begins in early June.
V. OTHER
A. Civic Center Site Development
The Survey Section's participation in this project this month was:
1) Complete boundary and topographical survey research.
2) Staking of approx. boundary corners and floodplain limits for
site appraisal.
3) Evaluated proposals from two (2) consultants to complete boundary
and topographical surveys for the site.
B. General Information Mapping Upgrade and Update
U2date Status
1) 200 scale land base maps
2) 200 scale address maps
Upgrade Status
i) No progress on annex. and rd. jurisdictions maps
2) 85% completion of 400 scale City map
C. Routine Section Task Noted
1) An average of 10 public inquiries a day (7 via telephone and 3
counter) were handled by this section over this past month.
(RC:pm/00885)
a
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
�- COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May 21, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #: ` •
DATE SUBMITTED: May 15, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: Licensed 1983
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:
OLCC Application REQUESTED BY: Applicant
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Business: WEBFOOT DELI `
13815 ;SW Pacific Hwy., Tigard, OR 97223
Owners': John A. and Charlotte A.-Bloebaum
The above named business was licensed in 1983 to the above and one other co-owner.
At this time the revised licenseapplication does not indicate Other owners Other
than the two named above. The license application is the. same as the previous
license, a RMB (Retail Malt -Beverage outlet) beer and wine, which includes package
sales.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Recommend approval of the application and forwarding to OLCC. Respectfully,
R.-B. Adams
Chief of Police
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, :OREGON
TO: Mayor pro tem and Council : May 17, 1984
FROM: Loreen Wilson, Deputy Recorder��r.s
SUBJECT: Bid Award For 68th Sewer LID
Sealed bids were opened on 5/16/84. The results of the bid opening are being
studied at the time of packet preparation. Recommendation will be
hand-carried Monday evening, 5/21/84 for your consideration.
�r>
lw/1571A
r
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
MEMORANDUM
May 21, 1984'
TO: Robert W. Jean, City;,Administrator
FROM: Frank A. Currie, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: S.W. 68th Avenue Sewer Bids
On Wednesday, May 16, 1984, bids' for the S.W. 68th Avenue Sanitary`Sewer '
were opened and read.
Five bids were received, ranging from approximately $118,000 to $234,000.
The Engineers:estimate was $121,000.
Because of a misunderstanding of the intention of an alternate bid for rock
excavation, and because of apparent unbalanced bidding which could' cause some
items to actually cost consiaerably more than the apparent bid, staff recom-
mends that it in the best interest of the city to reject all bids and to
re-advertise for a bid opening on June 1, 1984.
Bid summary attached.
Ln
cs
�fa
� In
in
i ca
y H o+ Li v �$ 4.. ➢Ci'- q M i''F a- m m> 1!b N In .4
LO
7
E.UI
z wIN1 aP N of a' 1.,1
g •C' c� c
cz
`6
w H c' 47v e o s
C14 2
D r ra
U'
u7 q
ya a lull
_ r
ca
w0 -s a u►
4' z 0o a^ 4 -t- LAQ = p a N
a F M cQ? 4 .fid. o eN+f : ,A LA
Ln LA
Lp
Ia aC4�
-1I
! m fid' In
Y
^
_ it N �I
Py In o r n Ln J
Ll in
to
H 1>4
i
A� N $
'-� µ'7d y N N n. fl-A"R
N E. O c <"+ m d -fir i• �:
}� ag1
41
IV 10
ba
H D I r7 a U U a U U a r7 a w W 46'7 t6s7 U a :.
cea w � 1 I 1 1
a
I c a a o W L w
np 1 C
14
td CO oD > N u N•+ U C .N O NW N x �.' N I
4y�+ ..+ W u N .L •U U OiJ W U H V � H
WPM = 1 6 N 6L
14
In .-! co CO 10 .O `? LA W Vl C-)
cn 17 u'f �D 1� 0Y •-1 .-1 .-i .•� •�.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: 5/21/84 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: 5/17/84 PREVIOUS ACTION:
• ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Deny Creation
s
4
Of Train Whistle Free Zone REQUESTED BY:
6
DEPARTMENT READ OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: C C\ ?
INFORMATION SUMMARY t
Staff feels that the adoption of a train Whistle Free Zone presents public
safety and public liability problems for the City and community which might
outweigh local concerns.
}
F
i
1,
t
ti
4•
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Recommend establishment of whistle free zone to PUC
2. Table for further information
3. Deny request
r
SUGGESTED ACTION I ~
Staff reconunends denial of request, '
O'DONNELL, DATE
May 10, 1984
SULLIVAN & RAMIS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW TO Bob Jean, ..City .Administrator
1727 N.w. HOYT STREET.- '
PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 Frank Currie, Public Works Director
15031 222-4402 FROM
Adrianne Brockman, City Attorney' s Office
R
Creation of a Train Whistle Free Zone
I. THE REQUEST
This memorandum was prompted by 'a request from Mr. William Shenk,
residing at 15685 S. W. Upper Boones Ferry Rd. Mr. Shenk requests
that the city file a 'petition with the Public Utilities Commission
to create a whistle free zone. The request is for a whistle free
zone at the point where the railroad tracks cross 72nd Avenue 5
approximately 1,000 feet north of where 72nd Avenue crosses
Boones 'Ferry Road.
II HISTORY OF TRAIN WHISTLE FREE ZONE
The 1983 Legislature (HB 2840) gave the PUC the authority to
regulate the blowing of train whistles. I am:told ;that the
blowing of train "whistles in Salem as the trains pass by the,
es a real nuisance.
court 'buildings and Willamette University creat
This legislation was aimed at solving that problem:
The prerequsites 'to the creation of a whistle free zone are that
the grade crossing be` equipped-with ,automatic gates, flashing
lights and audible protective devices.
III. CREATION OF A WHISTLE FREE ZONE
There are two ways to create a whistle free zone:
1. The City Council can petition the PUC to create the zone;
or
2. The citizens can petition the PUC; however, the PUC will
not act on the petition until the city council formulates
a recommendation.
The fact is that the city cannot escape involvement in the process.
IV. THE ISSUE
The question is one of liability. Assuming for some reason only
one of the warning devices or all of the warning devices failed
to operate and someone is injured or killed by a train crossing ;
the roadway. The question is: What is the city's liability? `.
I discussed the liability question with staff from the City of
Salem and the PUD. They agree the answer is unknown at this
time. Apparently, the City of Salem found the nuisance issue -to
outweigh the risk; however, they agree that while the Oregon Tort
Claims Act limits liability to $300,000, it may be possible to
bring an action in federal court where the liability would be ,
1
AB:m.ch
E
5/10/84
Page 1.
O'DONNELL. DATE May 10, 1984
SULLIVANc& RAWS
e
ATTORNEYS AT LAW TO Bob Jean and Frank Currie
1727N.W. HOYT-STREET
PORTLAND. OREGON 97209 -.
-15031 222-4402 FROM Adrianne Brockman
'.RE Creation of a Train Whistle Free Zone
unlimited. It can be argued that the PUC makes the decision and,
therefore, the liability should rest there if there is ,any
liability, ; but these days .it is unpredictable who would be found
liable.
The City of Salem had a proviso put in the PUC order that the
train engineer could blow the whistle if the gate or signal
failedto operate, but I `do not understand how this changes the r" ,
liability issue. How can an engineer on a moving train see
whether all of the warning devices are operating far enough; in
advance of:a crossing to make the sounding of a whistle effective?
V. OTHER ISSUES
The railroads do not support this legislation for a number `of
reasons, I am 'told. The Salem whistle free zone is not effective
yet, and they are anxious to see if the railroad complies with E
the PUC order. Enforcement is expected to be an issue.
VI. THE ISSUE BEFORE THE CITY
The question for the city to resolve is whether it wants to assume
P the risk. The city is insured to $1 million. However, the exact
insurance coverage should be checked if the city decides it wants t
to assume the risk. I would also recommend discussing this matter
with your insurance carrier.
F
t
i
i;
I
1..
i
AB:mch €
5/10/8a i
Page 2
1
i
4
t
t:
Space Number 55
15685 S. w. Upper'boones Ferry Aoad 4
Lake Grove, Oregon 97034
{
Mr. Frank Currie :
Director of Public Works
City of Tigard
P. U. Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223 E
r
mar mr. Currie:
I am writing this letter as a formal request to create a train whistle/horn free
zone at the-railroad crossing located on S. W. 72nd Avenue approxim .telt' 1UUU feet
north of the intersectiot With S. w. Upper Boones Ferry Roid..
According to conversations I had with ;`fir. Craig Aeiley of the Pub lie Utility Com-
missioner's Office, who has the authority to create the whistle free zones, they must
receive a pstiti.on from the public agency' responsible for the road that crosses the
railroad i 'order<to establish the zone. I discussed this particular matter with fir. r
Joh-a'Hagm m in a phone conversation two weeks a;o and, he suggested I addres.% the request
directly to your attention.eine your office has jurisdiction over that particular is
ra�.Iroad crossing: E
The Mobile Home Park, which I share a space with 56 other homeowners, lies adjacent
to the crossing. Since the intersection is fully protetected with flashing lights, r
ically operate at the approach of a train, we feel
bells, need barricades, which automat
u
tl5m additional sounding of the train's horn and whistle unnecessary. The noise only �.
disrupts the peace and quiet of the people living nearby in the court since the trains
use this area to switch railroad cars between the hours of 11 p.m. to 1 a.m. =. d 4 a•m•
to 9 a.m. every day during the week. I even tried using ear plugs b-4t they are not
effective.
Us behalf of the residents of t4ps, e hc� cure c..ax tel. :do everythd g
possible to expedite tip Iter. I am,,ennclosi _oa material I received from the 8
,Cublic Utility COPM-Ssicner'a Office for ;your reference. I will be available to an-
serer any questions and help-in any way possible. _Thank you for your time and attention.
vrry truly yours,
nclosur¢�s. billiaa.H. Shenk
phone no.: b20a780 �
4.F6F �4 ,
w � PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONER OF OREGON
LABOR & INDUSTRIES BUILDING, SALEM OREGON 97310 PHONE (503)378-6660
101L 11X-
March 15,, 1984
Bill Shenk
15685 Upper Boones Ferry Rd #55
Lake Grove OR 97034
RE: Train Whistling
Attached please find a "copy of House Bill 2840 and
OAR 860-42-330, 'which pertain to trains whistling at
grade crossings. Per our iDhone ,conversation, I under-
stand you are a private citizen interested in having
the trains stop blowing their whistle at some crossings.''
you will note that only fully protected crossings can
be included in a whistle-prohibition order.
As discussed, you should approach the public authority
with jurisdiction over the roadway -tha:t._intersects the
track and request that it file a petition with the
Commissioner -to establish a whistle-free zone.
If the public authority is not willing to file such a
petition, you could submit a petition directly to the
Commissioner requesting him to review the situation on
his own motion. We would recommend a substantial number
of cosigners on such a petition.
if you have any additional questions or comments, please
feel free to call me at the number shown above.
Craig J. Reiley
Administrator
Crossing Safety Division
kg/50541
Attachments: HB 2840
OAR 860-42-330 1
CC: DJA
ORDER NO. — 770
ENTERED December 1, 1983
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONER '
OF OREGON
AR 95
In the Matterof the Adoption ) h
e
of Rules of the Public Utility ) c
commissioner Relating to Sounding ) ORDER �
of -Train' Whistles at Railroad- )
Highway Grade Crossings. )
The 1983 Legislative Assembly passed House Bill 2840
(1383 Oregon Laws Chapter 750), which provides that the Com-
missioner may regulate the sounding of train whistles at
railroad-highway ,grade crossings.
gr
On October 4, 1983, the Commissioner filed a State-
ment of Need and Fiscal Impact and a Notice of Hearing with
the Secretary of State regarding Division 42 of the Commis-
sioner' s Rules (OAR Chapter 860) . The Statement and Notice
were published in the October 15, 1983, Secretary of State' s f
bulletin. `
On October 5, the Commissioner served Notice of
Hearing on potentially affected parties. The potentially
affected parties included railroads and public authorities
responsible for streets, roads, and highwe.vs. t
Prior to the hearing, written comments were received
from: C. W. Broughton, Mayor of Coburg; Wanda J. Gibson,
concerned citizen; and George M. Joseph, Chief Judge of the
Oregon 'Court of Appeals.
A hearing was held on October 27, 1983, in Salem,
Oregon, before Bonni Canary, a Hearings Officer for the
Commissioner. Appearances were entered: `
For the PUC Staff ;
Paul A. Graham
Assistant Attorney General
Saler,., Oregon
y
Q _ ,
ORDER NO- 83 - 770
For Interested Parties:
Jeff S. Asay
General Attorney
Oregon Railroad Association
John Elegant
Building and Safety Administrator
Common Council, City of Salem
ry
Also present were: Ben Beberness, United Transportation
Union; ,have 'Astle, PUC; and Craig Reiley, PUC. '
At the hearing, staff distributed the rules set forth
in Appendix 11A. " Basically, they provide that at railroad-
highwaygrade crossings (1)
the sounding ;of train whistles is
not required unless specifically ordered by the Commissioner, f
` (2) a procedure is established by which a, public authority, `
railroad, or Commissioner may initiate a proceeding to prohibit
the sounding of a train whistle`, and (3) the railroad shall
as
notify employes in writing of cases where` the Commissioner _'
prohibited the sounding of train whistles-
The Oregon Railroad Association (ORA) expressed
opposition to a standardized sign requirement at crossings
where whistle sounding would be prohibited on the ground
that it would be unnecessary and unreasonable. Based on the
railroad' s experience, circulated materials were adequate to
advise engineers of the prohibition. ORA admitted that this
method could be confusing as the number of prohibited areas
increased. PUC staff projects 15 to 20 prohibited areas within
the next few years. The United Transportation Union favored
standardized signing- In light of the projected number of
prohibited areas, a standardized sign is preferable and should
be required.
ORA also questioned the standard an applicant would be
required to meet to obtain a prohibitory order. Staff responded
on behalf of the Commissioner that as a preliminary matter, an
applicant would have to request a prohibitory order at a fully
signalized crossing, then safety and environmental factors
would be considered.
Finally, because of potential liability problems, the
railroads expressed opposition to any language in a prohibitory
order which would give engineers discretion as to whether or
not to blow the whistle. This issue need not be decided at
this time since it is not addressed in the rules.
i
-2-
ORDER NO. 0s
Written commentsranged from one request `for varied
pitch whistles at blind spur crossings to other requests for
total prohibition of 'whistle sounding at highway grade cross-
ings controlled with "STOP" signs or signals. The varied pitch
request is beyond the scope of this rule because it does not
deal with types of whistles. The other requests support the
proposed rule in<that' it limits whistleblowing, but would
go even to the extent of prohibiting it in cases of reduced
signalization. There is not sufficient evidence of safety
to extend the rule further at this time. A total prohibition
of whistle sounding on grade crossings which ara not -fully
signalized may endanger the public. The proposed rules set
forth ;in Appendix: "A" permitting the prohibition of whistle''
sounding at fully signalized crossings should be adopted.
ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Statement of Need
filed with the Secretary of State on October 4, 1983, is
incorporated in this 'order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Division 42 of OAR
Chapter 860 is amended to reflect the adoption of the rules set
forth in Appendix "A. ea
Made, entered, and effective 7 43
\V C0
LOBDE-
C/; toj �J
Public U ty Commissioner
Xf
rrrj0137o
-3-
oIDER NO. 83 - 770
APPENDIX Q1A"
OAR 860-_ 42-330
SOUNDING OF THE TRAIN WHISTLE AT GRADE CROSSINGS
(1) The sounding of, the locomotive whistle in advance
of railroad-highway grade crossings equipped with
operating automatic gates, flashing lights, and
audible protective devices, conforming to applicable It
commissioner' s standards, is not required, unless
specifically ordered by the Commissioner.
(2) Upon petition of a public authority or a railroad, k
or on his own motion, the Commissioner may center- an
order, after hearing if :necessary, prohibiting the
sounding of the locomotive whistle in advance of t
specified -`railroad-highway grade crossings equipped x
with automatic gates, flashing lights, and audible
protective devices.
(3) When an order prohibiting the sounding of the locomo-
tive whistle
ocomo-Live 'whistle in advance of :certain railroad-highway
grade crossings has been entered by the Commissioner,
the railroad shall provide written notification to
its employes of the prohibition and. shall install
appropriate signing adjacent to its tracks to clearly
designate the segment or segments of line to which
the whistle-sounding prohibition applies.
is
E
z
DJA ;
8/22/83
kb/0543] t'
4
K
I
g
r
APPENDIX
Page l sof 1
c. <750
62nd OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY-1983 ReMilar Scs6oa
Enrolled
House Bill 2840
Sponsored by Representative J. HILL (at the request of United Transportation Union, Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen)
750
CHAPTER ........: .... ..... ... ............
AN ACS
r
Relating to railroads;creating new provisions;amending ORS 763.035;and declaring an emergency. -
Be It Enwed by the People of the State of Oregon:
SECTION 1.ORS 763.035 is amended to read:
763.035. (1)The power to ix and regulate the speed of railway trains and to rqplate the sounding of
railway train warainil devises at public railroad-highway crossings is vested exclusively in the state.
(2)Upon petition of any public authority in interest or of any railroad or upon(his]than commissioner's
own motion, the commissioner small, after due investigation and hearing, unless a hearing is not required
under ORS 763.080 enter an order fixing and regulating the speed of railway trains or regulating the ummding
of railway train warning dev€ms.
(3) The speed limits fixed by the commissioner shall be maximum speed limits and shall be
commensurate with the hazards presented and the practical operation of the trains.
SECTION 2.Notwithstanding the amendments to ORS 763.035 by section l of this Act,any ordinance
of a political subdivision of this state that regulates the sounding of railway train warning devices and that is
in effect on the effective date of this Act shall remain in effect and shall not be preempted by ORS 763.035 2a
amended by section 1 of this Act until the Public Utility Commissioner,after the effective date of this Act,
first enters an order establishing regulation of railway train warning devices under the authority granted by the
amendments to OILS 763.035 by section 1 of this Act.
SECS7OIN 3.This Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and
safety,an emergency is declared to exist,and this Act takes effect on its
Approved by the Governor August 4: 1983.
Filed in the office of Secretary of State August 5® 1983.
i
�A
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Mayor pro tem, and City CouncilMay 16, 1984
FROM: Doris 1lartig, Assistant Finance Director
SUBJECT: Status Report On Car Arson Incident
The insurance company reimbursed the City in the amount of $6,995.00 to
replace a vehicle lost by arson. Mr. Jean has made :a claim against the City
for $36.50 for the replacement of an electric garage 'door opener.. Mr. Brian's
claim for damage to his 'shrubs was denied as there was no negligence on the
part of the City employee in parking the car in -vim TAT-• ���!'c'
lw/1571A
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May 21, 1984"
AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: May 16, -1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: Plannin Commission
t
1984
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Recommendation May 8,
NPO Appointments REQUESTED BY: '
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: _� CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Eleven applicants for NPOmembership', have been recommended cd iePlanning
Commission as well as one.:transfer ofCouncil acton
,membership.:
favoring
eleven new applicants and the transfer will make all seven NPO's fully
constituted with at least seven members.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve all eleven new members and the transfer.
2. Approve some of the applications and reject others.
3. Reject all applicants.
SUGGESTED ACTION
The. Planning Cou mission recommends approval of all eleven applicants and the
tr2snsfer. The Council should by motion approve all applications
0444P
dmj
f
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Members of the City Council May 15, 1984
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development
SUBJECT: NPO Appointments
The following individuals have applied for membership on the City's NPO°s:
Emmett Whitaker, 13250 SW Burnham St. NPO # 1
Floyd ;Bergman, 11600 SW 90th Ave. NPO # 2
Roger Maddox, 11555 SW '88th, Apt.' # 48 NPO' # 2
Mark Padgett, 11270 SW 95th NPO°;# 2
Duane 'Ehr, 10425 SW Park Street NPO' # 3
Ralph L. Flowers, '11700 SW Gaarde St. NPO"# 3
William Shenk, 15685 SW Upper Boones
Ferry Road, 4# 55 NPO 9# 5
Sue Carver, 10155 SW Hoodview NPO 9# 6
Mary Clinton, 9865 SW View Court NPO # 6
Bruce Rodgers, 10305 SW Serena Way N?0 # 6
Connie Smith, 8860 SW Scheckla Dr. NPO # 6
These eleven individuals were considered for membership by the Planning
Commission under a new format of review. The old system, which entailed an
initial review by a membership interview committee followed by Commission
review, has been replaced by a one step review. This new approach encourages
each applicant to attend the Commission meeting when his or her application is
considered as the first item on the monthly agenda to state briefly why he or
she wishes to be an NPO member. The new format worked to everyone's liking at
the Commission meeting of May 8th. ' At that meeting eight of the eleven
applicants had an opportunity to meet with the Commission. Three applicants
were unable to attend the Planning Commission meeting, Floyd Bergman, Ralph
Flowers, and Sue Carver. Each of these individuals has been active in Tigard
activities in the past, therefore the Commission recommended their
confirmation. The gCommission did ask me to drop a note to these three
individuals suggesting that they attend the Council meeting in case the
Council has questions concerning their interest.
The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend the eleven individuals
for NPO membership. The Commission also, in a separate action, voted to
recommend that Mr. Murel Gillen, recently appointed to NPO ;# 6, have his
( membership switched to NPO # 22 the location of his new address.
Should the Council approve the eleven new applicants as well as Mr. Gillen's
transfer, the makeup of the 'NPO's willbeas follows:'
TOTAL MEMBERS
NPO # '1 9
NPO # 2 7
NPO # 3 g
NPO # 4 9
NPO # 5 10
NPO # '6 11
NPO # 7 g
Staff Recommendation:
The staff recommends that the eleven new applicants be approved as well as the
transfer of Mr. Gillen to ;NPO # 2.
i
dmj(0441P)
F
4
r
N P 0 A P P L 1 C A 1' I O N
QUESTION: What are NPO's? phases of
in all p
process and the tat
sive
those
ANSWER: The function of each NFO is to be involved
the Comprehensive Planning P or other actions ;
Tans; policies, projects including, but not limited
Plans; to review City p hborhood' human resources,'
affecting the livability of the<neig facilities,
to. land use, zoning. housing. community. environ
traffic and transportation,
social and recreational programs.arks;;to participate in he process
ment
mental quality, open ace and P to F improve
and develoP
of determining City prilorities for Cap
hborhood informed; to seek
to represent the t
of specific is
Plans; ue keep the neig neighborhood importance.
neighborhood oPiuion on issues brought before them'
views of the neighborhood in matters of extra neig
• 4r
i9
a
PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW i
ADDRESS J-3 Stt�i.L PiniHi�I`! G i ,
NA,E 0=f1i IST T� �?
��i-�ticltf
(Res.) —
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.) I
PRESENT OCCUPATION
FIRM NAME
y R yl--
2
-- —' €
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? —ALL
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA?
_ 5
HAVE YOU BEEN YI.'VOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? / O —
s
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT: [
I.
i'
WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MEMBER OF AN NPO. 17 r`
IAJPjVl
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:S L
7r;ON
DAYTIME TELEPHONE NUMBER^ `
N P O A P P L I C A T I O N
QUES9'I0N: What are HPO's?
rocess and the implementation of those
AYSWER The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the Comprehensive Planning' P cessanprojects or other actions
P to review City plans; Policies,neighborhood,
including, but not limited
affecting the livabilihousnghecommunity, facilities, human resources, / t
to, land use, 'zoning. rams, traffic and transportation. environ
social and recreotpien�paCeoa.nd parks;` to particiPatc in the process
mental quality, rovements and development4
of determining City priorities for capital imp
xo ect plans; to keep the neighborhocd informed; to seek
of specific p importance.
neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the
views of the op neighborhood`in matters of extra neighborhood imp
PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW
ADL?RESS 1 ( �0 `�-
NAME R-OYR E9���')t)
(Res.)
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus. 60��
PRESENT OCCUPATION " S
FIRM NAME
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM?
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA? '
t
HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BE OREo i
J
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT:
1
T DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MEMBER OF A NPO? /
WHA 1 J
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
s
DAYTIME,-TELEPHONE NUAtBER��Cr�/���----
f•
N P 0 A P P L 1 C A T I 0 N
QUESTION: What are NPO's?
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the Comprehensive Planning process and the implementation of those
plans; to review City plans; policies, projects or other 'actions
affecting the livability of the neighborhood, including, but not limited
to, land use, zoning, housing, community, facilities, human"resources.
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, environ-
mental quality, open space and parks; to participate.'in the process
of determining City priorities for capital improvements and development
of specific'project;plans; ,to keep the neighborhood informed; to seek
neighborhoodopinion on issues brought before them; to represent the
views of,the neighborhood,`in matters of extra neighborhood importance.
PLEASE COMPLETE THE 'QUESTIONS BELOW
NAME J)t,4 q e FJ7?,e ADDRESS //O ye? S5 J �AlE J'C �f• -
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.) - (Res.
PRESENT OCCUPATION 13(4 tl ' 54f 117e-x17�
FIRM NAME ��!/t'�'S �{//Ns/Y4,5
P HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? U/te %le sd-p-
l IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA? �/
HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? p�7 [�j
IF YES, PLEASE/EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVENIENT:C"q$4? Ala, 11 2
0102C eL'llydlN_.r7' a>
Js�Dn1�'/1Cta7C. ®2UT .c?r /rl?,Si�y the Awe,4 o,,:
11 <� �1 S_ k oT
WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MEMBER OF AN NPO? '- ,
/�ttr .�•,:�. .I:t .7�• -i n,0if Cfy'✓1-1'.C. 'J ,t.;' /.f,.:._t/- n ,'..0 �. �'.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
DAYTIME, TELEPHONE NUMBERa2 3 y A5K reR -0u4nC E/r,p
��t2Jan
CITY OF TIRD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
DATE
NAME: J
w4
RES P /�
HONE• 1113
`
ADDRESS (RES.
S. PHONE:
ADDRESS (BUS.): ,
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: A/, SUGGESTED BY:
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY?
I �
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND:
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM.
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (/ PO APPLICANTS ONLY)?
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: /
A.
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: / r�
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS):
P' _-"7;-!..!_iJl...°""•'` �-/." �-.- �+. t /`-r.1r..0 is
BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN:
/! Q
M ----------------•--
r -- -------------------- --------------- Date Interviewed
Date Received at City Hall
i Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO
Inside City Outside City
(0346p)
CITYOFTIOARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
/
DATE
NAME: /I�L.GifJi3�
RES. PHONE
ADDRESS (RES.) /_ �5 /�/ . �c�G'/YC S �• s� Or i.
/G ! y BUS'. PHONE: t
ADDRESS (BUS-):
///11t ,yam
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: --
SUGGESTED BY: !/
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? /C/
i 1 c'
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: �S /�=i
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND:
enelzvL
HOW LONGHAVE ..YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH :THIS FIRM?
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN:YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY) L.�
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY:
is
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES:
1./
OTHER INFORMATION (GENE L REMARKS):
BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN:
---------------�--------
Date Received at City Hall
------------ Date Interviewed —
Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO
Inside City Outside City
_(U346p)
F
t N P O A P P I. 1 C A 1'
QUESTION: What are NPO's? J
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all Phases of
the Comprehensive Planning projecthe Ptscornother nactions
of se
plans; to review City p but ;no.t limited
affecting the livability of the neighborhofacilities, human resources,
to, land use, zoning, housing, communitic and transportation„ environ-
social ahct recreational space
nds.parks; to participate In the process;
mental quality, open- space and P rovements and development
ofdetermining City priorities for capital imp to seek
of specific project
pissues brought of extra neighborhood oect PI ,to keep the neighborhood informed;
ht before them; to represent the
neighborhood rI
views of the neighborhood in matters
rhood importance.
PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW
NA9(E wf��G •� C� Z ADDRESS
�ii i. ,�Gz1 (.� Y__—Lc-T_-�'�•''-yam,'%�J.�-2 ?
(Res.)
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.) -
PRESENT OCCUPATION .7f "1``
FIRM NAME
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM?
F
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA?
HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED WITR MUNICIPAL OPERATIONStFORE?____I,_,
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT:
WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MEMBER OF AN NPO T�/�
Z
C_ !,._' 11 7'G� -CSC Ly r ,l'� l-� 4 i c / _ ✓
ell-
'AtJD hL-CO i:NTS: --
DAYTIME •TELEPHONE NUMBER
C'.•\ N P O A' P P L I C A T 1 U K
QCES'('ION: What are NPO's?
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all Phases Of
the-Comprehensive 'Planning-process and the implementation of those
plans; to review City plans; policies, projects or other actions
affecting the''livability of the neighborhood, including, but no,t limited
to, land use, zoning, housing, _community, facilities, human resources,
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, environ-
mental quality, open space and parks; to participate in the process
of determining City,_priorities for capital improvements and development
of specific project plans; to keep the neighborhood informed; to seek
neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the
views,of the neighborhood in matters of extra neighborhood importance.
PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BEL01y
NAifE (/ tom __ ADDRESS �U� 12-e 7
-
-,
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus. es.) 6 3
F PRESENT OCCUPATI O[� 7� r12�7�c -f�
FIRM NAME
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM?
l IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA?
HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? / O
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT:
WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFF'ER, AS A MEMBER OF AN NPO?
Com.%�-`- % �L/�1�4�� -C�iG�i :2!/J f.��✓ �/ C!/Y�
�- DAYTIME TE [IONE NUMBER
N P O A P P L I C A T I O N
QI:ESTION: What are NPO's?
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the Comprehensive Planning process and the implementation of those
plans', to review City plans; policies, projects or other actions
affecting the livability of the neighborhood, including,` but not limited
Co, 'land use; zoning housing, community, facilities, human resources,'
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, environ-
mental quality, open space and 1parks;. to participate.in the process
of determining City prioritiesfor capital improvements and development
of specific,Project plans; to keep the neighborhood informed; to seek
neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the
views' of'the neighborhood in matters of extra neighborhood importance. f,
is
PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW
}
NAbf£ 1L ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.) t z` 5 - 3 (Res.) (- L' ` L -
i
PRESENT OCCUPATION I '�—+!` ;
FIRM NAME - ' ^
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? z
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA? N
HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? `I•2
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT: rv` H'> i,:--c
q
C: v.<
c
WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MEMBER OF AN NPO?
- - -
- r
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: __- - -------- ----- -
x
DAYTIME TELEPHONE NUMBER i>
Mj-
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #1
POSITION
-TERM EXPIRES
GARETH (Gary) S. OTT - ACTING CHAIRPERSON 08/16/86
9055 S.W. Edgewood
Tigard, Oregon '.97223 (in)
Res: 620-0267
Bus: 221-1814
RALPH APPLEMAN 06/09/84
12555 S.W. Hal-1 Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (out)
Res: 634-5976 (Prop.Owner in);
Bus: 639-9744':
JB BISHOP> 07/25/87
10505 S.W. Barhur Blvd, Suite 303
Portland, Oregon 97219 (out)
Res: 232-6599`
Bus:' 246-5479 or
243-9174 (Voice Pager)
;t
CAROLYN EADON 12/20/86 €�
12645 S.W. Steven Court
' Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in) [,
Res: 62.0-8506 {'
E
JOHN OTTING 03/09/85 :
8885 S.W. O'Mara
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in) "
Res: 639-3686 €.
Bus: 224-6435
HARRY OWEN 03/09/85
9765 S.W. Frewing F
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in) I,
Res: 620-4619 i
EDWARD D'UFFIELD .
8895 S.W. Edgewood
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 639-4759
ROBERT WYFFELS g'
8895 S.W. Edgewood
s
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 620-1577
Bus: 627-0385
_.•' NPO MEETS: 1st Wednesday, 7:30 p.m.
Tigard City Hall
STAFF LIAISON: Keith Liden
R-5/84 (dc:0011p)
R
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #2
POSITION
TERM EXPIRES
MARY A. KESKI 09/13/86
2385 S.W. 173rd Court
Aloha, Oregon 97006 (out)
Res': 649-1624
Bus': 684-0239
DENNIS P. RUSSELL 01/01/87
12020 S.W. 95th Avenue
Tigard, Oregon '97223 (in)
Res: 620-2370
Bus: 6'35-SAVE
'£NOMAS R. WOODWARD 01/01/87
11970 S.W. Lincoln
Tigard, Oregon ,97223 (in)
Res 620-1280
Bust 643-6474'
MAILING LIST:
North Tigard Business Assoc.
c/o P.O. Box 23385
Tigard, Oregon 97223
. NPO MEETS: Inactive as of 9/1/83
R-5/84(dc:0011p)
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #3`
POSITION
TERM EXPIRES
BOB BLEDSOE' - CHAIRPERSON 01/21/86
11800 S.W. Walnut
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (out)
Res: 639-8937
Bus: 796-7126
DENNIS L. MOONIER 05/24/86
10634 S.W. Cook Lane
Tigard, ,Oregon 9722.3 (in)
Res: 620-6680
Bus: 221-2796
LOU ANE MORTENSEN 05/24/86
11160 S.W. Fonner
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (out)
Res: 620-3072
Bus: 243-3520
05/24/86
HERMAN PORTER
11875 S.W. Gaarde Road
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
- Res: 639-0895
Bus: 639-0545
VITTZ RAMSDELL-VICE CHAIRPERSON 05/24/86
11635 S.W. Terrace Trails Drive
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 620-2772
Bus: 240-6282 ext. 204
MICHAEL A. SMITH 12/20/86
11645 S.W. Cloud Court
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 620-3656
NPO MEETS: 1st Monday, 7:30 p.m-
Fowler Jr. High French Room
STAFF LIAISON: Keith Liden
R-5/€34(dc:0011p)
NEIGHBORHOOD, PLANNING ORGANIZATION #4
POSITION
TERM EXPIRES
LaVALLE ALLEN - CHAIRPERSON 09/13/86
7540 S.W. Hermoso Way
Tigard, Oregon 97223. (in)
Res: 639-0592
Bust 636-8642
GERALDINE L. BALL - SECRETARY 09/13/86
11515 S.W. 91st Avenue
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-2900
LOU.W. CHRISTEN 09/13/86
17895 S.W. Shasta Terrace
Tualatin, Oregon 97062 (out)
Res: 692-6360
JEAN DANLEY 09/13/86
7060 S.W. Beveland
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
{ Res: 639-4876
CARL JOHNSON 09/13/86
6155 S.W. Bonita Road
Lake Grove, Oregon 97035 (out)
° Res 639-1011
IRVING LARSON 09/13/86
11720 S.W. 68th
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-1497
GORDON MARTIN 09/13/86
12265 S.W. 72nd
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 620-2477
RICK McMAHON 09/13/86
13111 S.W. 61st
Portland, Oregon 97219 (out)
Res: 639-6225
ALAN ROTH 09/13/86
7420 S.W. Hermoso Way
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-5827
NPO MEETS: 1st Wednesday, 7:30 P.M. , Tigard City Hall
STAFF LIAISON: Keith Liden
R-5/84(dc:00191,)
r NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #5
POSITION
TERM EXPIRES
DEBRA J. ,NAUBERT - CHAIRPERSON 07/21/86
14365 S.W. 80th Place
Tigard, ;Oregon 97223" (in)
Res: 620-8425
Bus: 248-5015
BILL BIEKER 04/18/87
7730 S.W. Cherry Street
Tigard, Oregon:97223 (in)`
Res': 639-5765
Bus: 620-1620
HOWARD CORNUTT 03/08/87
11720 S.W. Lynn
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 620-2180
Bus: 641-6143
GERALD W. EDMONDS 07/25/87
520 S.W. Yamhill, Suite 610
Portland, Oregon 97204 (out)
Res: 692-4634
Bus: 222-2867
CRAIG HOPKINS - VICE CHAIRMAN 07/21/86 E
7430 S.W. Varns
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-5823
Bus: 563-0440 :
is
JOHN D. LOGSDON 07/21/86
7570 S.W. Cherry Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
(in) {
Res: 639-8967
Bus: 238-6321
e.m
JOHN SCHWART2 07/2LI86
15900 S.W. 76th
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 620-5963
Bus. 682-2601
c,
SHARON TAKAHASHI SECRETARY
7610 S.W. Cherry Street 07/21/86 .
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: ' 639•-4061
NPO MEETS: 3rd Wednesday, 7:30 P.M. , Tigard City Hall 4'
STAFF LIAISON: Keith Liden
R-5/84(dc:00llp) .,
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #5
(PAGE TWO)
l
HARRY'SAPORTA
7745 'S.W. 'Gentlewoods
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 684-1243
Bus: 238-4943
f
r
i#
t'
}
{
i
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #5
g
MAILING LIST
JOHN SMETS TED NELSON CLAIR UELTSCHI i
6830 S.W. Bonita Road 14280 S.W. 72nd COE MANUFACTURING
Tigard, Oregon 97223, Tigard, Oregon 97223 7930 S.W. Hunziker
Res: 620-1607 Tigard, Oregon 97223
Bus: 639-.3121 t
G
t
NPO MEETS; 3rd Wednesday, 7:30 P.M. , Tigard City Hall t�
STAFF LIAISON: Keith Liden
R-5/84(dc:0011p)
i
v
r NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING'ORGANIZATION'#6
i
'POSITION
TERM ,EXPIRES
PHILLIP A. PASTERIS CHAIRPERSON 09/28/85
8935 S.W. Pinebrook Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res": 639-9740
Bus: 221-3611
DAVE ATKINSON 12/20/86
10460 S.W. Century Drive
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-1402
MARGE DAVENPORT 09/28/85
15100 S.W. 109th
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)''
Res: 639-5637
EUNICE DAY 07/21/86
15940 S.W. Oak Meadow Lane '
Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (in)
Res 620-0843`
JERRY LINSCHOTEN 04/18/87
16120 S.W. Grimson Court
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-5067
Bus: 642-8867
JANE P. MILLER 09/28/85
10920 S.W. Highland Drive
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res 620-2038
LOREN TOWER 07/21/86
10040 S.W. McDonald
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-2536
MUREL GILLEN
14936 S.W. 109th
Tigard, OR 97223
Res: 639-4246 gg'
i
NPO MEETS: 3rd Thursday, 7:30 P.M. , Tigard City Hall
STAFF LIAISON- Keith Liden
R--5/84(dc:0011p) ,
.m-
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #7
POSITION
TERM'EXPIRES
RICHARD W. BOBERC- CHAIRPERSON 03/28/87
10660 S.W. North Dakota
Tigard, 'Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-2342
ELLA C. ,HINK 07/25/87
11333 S.W. Ironwood Loop
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-5911
YVONNE M. LARSON 03/87
10730 S.W. North Dakota
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-7828
JAMES MONROE 05/87
11-330 S.W. 108th
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 620-3704
Bus: 227-2524
PEGGY OBER 09/13/86
11385 S.W. Cottonwood Lane
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-2372
BARBARA PRIEST 07/21/86
10710 S.W. Ponderosa Place
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 620-6438
Bus: 682-3790
NANCY ROBBINS 07/21/$6
12185 S.W. Summer Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 620-4679
JOE SCHWEITZ 09/13/86
11020 S.W. Cottonwood Lane
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (in)
Res: 639-9226
Bus: 238-4882
(See Page 2 for Attendees)
�.` NPO MEETS: 2nd Wednesday, 7:30 P.M. , Tigard City Hall
STAFF LIAISON: Keith Liden
R-5/84(dc:0011p)