City Council Packet - 05/14/1984K-
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: 'Anyone wishing to speak on an.
y h
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA.: agenda item needs to :sign on: the appropriate
m
MAY 14, 1984, 7:30 P.M. sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, '
'0 FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH ask to be recognized by the..Chair at the start
10865 SW WALNUT. of that agenda item. :Visitor's agenda items.
x TIGARD,rOREGON 97223 are asked to bekept to 2 minutes or less; Longer
matters can'.be set for a future. Agenda by con-
tacting either
on-tacting;either the Mayor or_City Administrator.
0 1. REGULAR MEETING:'
1.1.. Call To Order and Roll Call
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 Call To Staff and CouncilForNon.-Agenda Items
7 35 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please)
_ 7:40 3. VIP'S OLCC APPLICATION
o. Director of Planning E Development
RECESS COUNCIL MEETING
7:50 4. TURA MEETING
4.1 Roll Call
4.2 Business Items - Meetings 6 Close Out Procedures
4.3 Adjournment
RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING
8:00 5. TMC TITLE 19 AMENDMENT RE: TURA MEETING SCHEDULE - ORDINANCE NO. 84-
0 Director of Planning 6 Development
8:05 6. SALE OFfGENERAL'OBLIGATION BONDS RESOLUTION NO. 84-
/ '.o Director of Finance _.
1
IS 7. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 4-84/NPO li3/WGK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
ORDINANCE NO. 84-
Ordinance prepared upon Council request from public hearing held on
4/23/84.
8:20 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 3-84/FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY
ORDINANCE NO. 84-
Ordinance prepared upon Council request from public hearing held on
4/30/84.
8:25 9. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 10-84/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
ORDINANCE NO. 84-
Ordinance prepared upon Council request from public hearing held on
4/30/84.
10. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS, PUBLIC HEARINGS
o Public Hearing Opened
o Summation by Planning Staff
o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
o Recommendation of Planning Staff
o Council Discussion
o Public Hearing Closed
830 10.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 14-84/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOCUMENT
A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission
regarding various sections of Volumes I, II, and III of the
comprehensive plan in response to issues raised in correspondence
from Washington County, the Home Builders Association of
Metropolitan Portland, Oregon Legal Services Corporation, The
Department of Environmental Quality, The Oregon State Housing
Division, 1,000 Friends of Oregon, Metro and the Land Conservation
and Development Commission Staff. ORDINANCE N0, 84-
COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 14, 1984 - PAGE 1
8:45 10.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 15-84/SETBACKS IN THE CG AND CP
Zr,.ig6
A recommendation by the City of 'Tigard Planning Commission
regarding the required setbacks in the General Commercial (CG) and
Commercial Professional'(CP)'zones. ORDINANCE NO. 84
9:00 BREAK `
(y:15 10.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA'16-84/AMENDMENT DECISION PROCESS
A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission
regarding Chapter 18.32 to allow the; Planning' Director to amend a
decision after findings have been prepared in response to issues `
that are raised prior to the appeal deadline. ORDINANCE NO. 84-
9:30 10.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 17-84/DENSITY'TRANSITION
A recommendation by the City of Tigard `,Planning Commission
regarding; the Density , Transition section of the code, "section
18.40.040, and 'conditions when application of this provision may
not be required. ORDINANCE NO. 84-
9:45 10.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 13-84/BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITi, 'IONS
A recommendation by the City of Tigard 'Planning 'Commission
regarding Section 18,98 of the Community Development" Code.
ORDINANCE NO. 84-
10:00 11. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted': in one motion without separate discussion. anyone may request
that an item be removed by motion ,for discussion and'`separate action.
Motion to:
11.1 Approve'Council Minutes r- April 23 6 30, 1984:
11.2 Award Bids: 'Patch Truck, Roller & Pole Building
11.3 Accept La Mancha Estates Subdivision Public Improvements Resolution
y No. 84-35
11.4 Receive Legal Opinion On Relocating Older Mobile Home Unite
11.5 Call Special Council Meetings May 21, 1984 & June 4, 1984 6 6/6/84-12 Noon
11.6 Cancel May 28, 1984 Regular Meeting
11.7 Approve Payment Of Consultant Work On Bond Sale - Foster 6 Marshall
and Ragen, Roberts, O'Scannlain, Robertson, 6 Neill
11.8 Approve Resolution No. 84-36 Whitlach Condemnation - 72nd Avenue
11.9 Approve Resolution No. 84-37 Gage Condemnation - 72nd Avenue
11.10 Approve OLCC Application - Steaks N' Such, 11290 SW Bull Mtn.
Class A License
10:05 12. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff
10:10 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1)(h) and ORS 192.660
(1)(d) to discuss pending litigation and labor relations issues.
10:30 14. ADJOURNMENT
(1517A)
COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 14, 1984 - PAGE 2
T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - MAY 14, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor pro tem Kenneth Scheckla; ;Councilors: Tom
Brian, 'John Cook, and Ima Scott; City Staff: Frank Currie,
Director of Public Works; Bob Jean, City Administrator;
' Bill Monahan, Director of Planning & Development; Liz
Newton, Associate Planner (arriving at 8:14 P.M. , leaving
at 9:10 P.M.) ; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Jerri Widner,
Finance Director (leaving at 8:14 P.M.); and Loreen ;Wilson,°
Deputy City Recorder.
2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS
a. City Administrator noted changes to the agenda.
b. Councilor Scott requested a report at the 5/21/84 meeting
regarding the burning of the City Administrator's car and rdamage
to Councilor Brian's home.
3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes of Less, Please)
a. " No _one appeared to speak
4. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 13-84/BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITATIONS
A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding
Section 18.98 of the Community Development Code.
a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to table
item to allow for further Planning Commission review.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
5. VIP'S OLCC APPLICATION
a. Director of Planning & Development stated staff recommended
Council approve OLCC application. Vip's has assurred the City
that there are no plans to have any adult entertainment at the
Stadium Club, 11445 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard, Oregon.
b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to recommend
approval of the license application with the condition that it not a
be used for 01adult entertainment" purposes.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
RECESS: 7:46 P.M.
6. TURA MEETING
6.1 Roll Call: Present: Agency Chairman Kenneth Scheckla; Agency
Members: Tom Brian, John Cook, and Ima Scott; City Staff: Frank
Currie, Director of Public Works; 'Bob Jean, City Administrator;
Bill Monahan, Director of Planning & Development; Tim Ramis, Legal
Counsel; Jerri Widner, Finance Director; and Loreen Wilson, Deputy
City Recorder.
Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAX 14, 1984
6.2 Business Items:
a. Legal Counsel reported on the close out procedures and recommended
Council modify the code to state that 'TURA 'meetings would be
called when needed, not 'once a` month, between now and the close
out date.
b. Agency Member Scott suggested that $3,000 be taken from the City's
GeneralSFund-to close out TURA now and not wait until TURA has
enough funds to close out.
C. City Administrator stated that staff would have to study the ORS
to, see that it is done correctly. Finance Director stated that
the TURA budget should be at a' zero balance by 6-30-84 and would
then not need a budget adopted for the 84-85 fiscal year.
d. Agency Member Brian stated he could not support a request to spend
the City's General Fund monies for TURA when the citizens voted to
close out TURA.
e. Consensus of Agency is to bring issue back in June for action.
6.3 ADJOURNMENT. 8:00 P.M.
RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING: 8:00 P.M.
�,- 7. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 14-84/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOCUMENT
l A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding
various sections of Volumes I, II, and III of the comprehensive plan in
response to issues raised in correspondence from Washington County, the
Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland, Oregon Legal
Services Corporation, The Department of Environmental Quality, The
Oregon State Housing Division, 1,000 Friends of Oregon, Metro and the
Land Conservation and Development Commission Staff.
a. Public Hearing Opened
b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to continue
hearing to June 11, 1984.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
8. TMC TITLE 19 AMENDMENT RE: TURA MEETING SCHEDULE
a. Consensus of Council was to set aside until June, 1984.
9. SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
a. Finance Director reported that all bonds sold by Oregon
municipalities must be registered. The City has received three
quesstimates from the Oregon Bank, First Interstate Bank and US
National Bank for the costs over the life of the bonds (20 years)
to act as Registrar/paying agent. She recommended Council award
the position to U.S. National Bank of Oregon.
Page 2' - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 14, 1984
b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to award the
{
position of Registrar/paying agent to U.S. National Bank of Oregon.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 84-38 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING LAND AND CONSTRUCTING A TIGARD-
CITY BUILDING.
d. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
FINANCE DIRECTORLEFT'- 8:14 P.M.
ASSOCIATE PLANNER NEWTON ARRIVED = 8:14 P.M.
C ,
10. ORDINANCE NO. 84-27 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND UPHOLDING THE }
PLANNING -COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE j
PLAN MAP AMENDMENT ('CPA 4-84 WGK DEVELOPMENT) AND
DECLARING AN'EMERGENCY.
a. Director of Planning & Development recommended approval. ' e
b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
11. ORDINANCE NO. 84-28 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 83-52 AND
REVISING THE FLOODPLAIN AND WETLANDS MAP; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY (CPAS 3-84)
a. Director of Planning& Development recommended approval.
b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
f .
12. ORDINANCE NO. 84-29 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CODE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY (CPA 10-84) {;
a. Director of Planning & Development recommended approval. f`
b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
13. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 15-84;SETBACKS IN THE CG AND CP ZONES }
A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding the j
required setbacks in the General Commercial (CG) and Commercial
Professional (CP) zones.
E
a. Public Hearing Opened
1.
Page 3 COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 14, 1984
b, Director of Planning & Development ,gave history of issue and
stated the front yard and corner lot ;setbacks in the C-G and C-P
zones are inconsistent and limit' flexibility: of development.
C. Public Testimony: No one 'appeared to 'speak.
d. Director of Planning & Development recommended approval of the
Planning Commission's recommendation to eliminate front yard and
corner lot setbacks. He noted the developer would still be
required to meet Access and Egress Provisions, Landscaping and
Screening Provisions, and Additional Yard Setback Requirements.
Those requirements would' not let the zero 'setbacks allow a
building'',to be placed at the lot line.
e. Public Hearing Closed
f, ' Council discussed concerns regarding' the zero setback
requirements. Consensus of Council was to change the ordinance as
follows:
Section l: C. 1. "There shall be no minimum front 'yard setback
requirement, however, conditions in Section 18.102 "Visual
Clearance Areas" and Section '18.100 "Landscaping and Screening"
must be met."'
Section 2: C. 1. - "There shall be no minimum front yard setback
requirement, however, conditions in Section 18.102 "Visual
r Clearance Areas" and Section 18.100 "Landscaping and Screening"
must be met."
g, ORDINANCE NO. 84-30 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18.62 C-G
(GENERAL COMMERCIAL) AND 18.64 C-P (PROFESSIONAL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE), DECREASING THE FRONT YARD AND CORNER AND
THROUGH LOT SET BACKS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (CPA 15-84)
h. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to adopt as
modified by consensus of Council.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
14. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 16-84/AMENDMENT DECISION PROCESS
A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding
Chapter 18.32 to allow the Planning Director to amend a decision after
findings have been prepared in response to issues that are raised prior
to the appeal deadline.
a. Public Hearing Opened
b. Director of Planning & Development stated staff has determined
that an amended decision process would be helpful for decisions
made by the Planning Director. He noted the proposal would
require any amended decision be filed by the Director within the
{ ten 'day appeal period. He stressed that this would still allow
for an appeal of the amended decision.
Page 4 -- COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY i4, 1984
C. Public Testimony:
Mrs. Mary Clinton, 9865 SW View Court, stated that more than one
person should be responsible for making land use decisions and
expressedconcern about the appeal process.
Legal Counsel and staff discussed the decision process of the City. e
City Administrator explained the difference between quasi-judicial
and legislative decisions.
Mr. Phil Edin, Planning Commission member, recommended approval.
d. Director of Planning & Development recommended approval and noted
a typographical error in the ordinance which staff will correct.
e. Public Hearing Closed.
f. ORDINANCE NO. 84-31 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18.32, ADDING
SETION 18.32.275 AMENDED DECISION PROCESS AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY. (CPA 16-84)
g. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to adopt
with typographical error corrected.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
15. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 17-84/DENSITY TRANSITION
A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding the
the code, section 18.40.040, and
Density Transition section of
conditions when application of this provision may not be required.
a. Public Hearing Opened
b. Director of Planning & Development gave history of issues.
Associate Planner noted that this amendment would not change the
rules on density transition however allows an exception process if
staff and Council deem that desirable.
1
C. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak.
d. Director of Planning & Development recommended approval.
e. Public Hearing Closed
f. ORDINANCE NO. 84-32 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18.40.040
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION, EXCLUDING LAND WHERE THE ACTUAL
DENSITY IN THE ESTABLISHED AREA EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM DENSITY
ALLOWED UNDER THE LAND USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION FOR THE
ESTABLISHED AREA, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (CPA 17-84)
g. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to amend the
reference in Section 1 from 1.25% to 125% and adopt ordinance.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 14, 1984
A .:.... -.. .mss_ -_..... �...-. ........ -
ASSOCIATE PLANNER LEFT: 9:10 P.M,
COUNCIL RECESS: 9:10 P.M.
COUNCIL RECONVENE: 9:30 P.M.
16. APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 23 6 30, 1984
a. Deputy Recorder requested Council amend minutes of: 4/23/84 as
follows•
Page 12, Item 33 add award of bid for : $5,900 to Rutan
Construction for repair work.
b. Motion by Councilor. Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve
as amended.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
17 AWARD BIDS: Patch Truck, Roller & Pole Building;
a.' Administrator and Public Works` Operations Superintendent reported
sealed rbids were <received for the materials and the following
bidders were recommended:'
Patch Truck - D.S.U. Peterbilt & GMC Inc. - $46,263.00
Roller Pacific Pioneer Equipment - ,$6,695.00
Pole Building - Parker Pole - $12,076.00
b. After lengthy discussion followed regarding bid process, Councilor
Brian moved to award bids as recommended. Councilor Cook seconded.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
18. RESOLUTION NO. 84-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN LA
MANCHA ESTATES SUBDIVISION AND AUTHORIZING
RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE BOND.
a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
19. RECEIVE LEGAL OPINION ON RELOCATING OLDER MOBILE HOME UNITS
a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to receive.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
20. CALL SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETINGS MAY 21, 1984 (7:30 P.M.) & JUNE 6, 1984
(12:00 NOON)
i a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
21. CANCEL MAY 2.8, 1984 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Page 6 COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 14, 1984
c .
a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
22. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CONSULTANT WORK ON BOND SALE - Foster & Marshall For
Approximately $5,900 and Ragen, Roberts, O'Scannlain, Robertson & Neill
not to exceed $5,500. y
a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present
23. RESOLUTION''NO. 84-36 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NECESSITY AND PUT<POSE
FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS-OF-WAY - AND
EASEMENTSFOR -72ND AVENUE AREA 'LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT, DIRECTING AN ATTEMPT TO -AGREE WITH
i
OWNERS AS TO COMPENSATION; THEREFORE iAUTHORIZING 3
CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS TO = ACQUIRE SAID
RIGHTS-OF-WAY. Ident #29/Whitlach
a
a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve. }
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
s
24. RESOLUTION NO. 84-37 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NECESSITY AND PURPOSE"
FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS-OF-WAY` AND
EASEMENTS FOR 72ND 'AVENUE AREA LOCAL'`IMPROVEMENT _
DISTRICT, DIRECTING AN ATTEMPT TO AGREE WITH G
OWNERS AS TO COMPENSATION; THEREFORE AUTHORIZING
CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS TO ACQUIRE SAID
RIGHTS-OF-WAY. Ident # 9/Gage
a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve.
F
s
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
F
25. APPROVE OLCC APPLICATION - Steaks N' Such, 11290 SW Bull Mountain Road, g
Class A License.
i
a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve.
r
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
26. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session
under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1)(h) and ORS 192.660 (1)(d) to
discuss pending litigation and labor relations issues at 9:54 P.M.
e
27. ADJOURNMENT: 11:08 P.M.
Deputy City Recorder City of Tigard
ATTEST: .
-Clwr - City of Tigard
/1567A),
Page 7 COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 14, 1984
�P
DATES�- - r T
I wish to testify before the Tigard 'City Council on
the following item: (Please print the information)
Item Description: '
r
k��xk9eic�cir*�#xkxk�sYfc�e��axrx&:etc**�c�isakirxFzt�c>•a*ikst�E#kx.�sti�xf�k*�e�tc��rxtsEie��xrxk*xtxE�csk��SexY**xYxk�ExkiY*ie�ie
Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue)
. xt��c#xkxkx@x@as�tfzx�:��rY�r�x'ek�r�sth�x�rrkkxkxk�e*xt3a�cs'txF�uic *xk9r�taestSciY9sa"cxtstirxkdrskx@s'�xY��e�c�x4xtfexka4�csk�cie*�xEdr���k� `,..,
Name, Address and Affiliation1 Name, Address and Affiliation
F
r
a,
9
DATE
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the 'following item: (Please print the information)
Item Description: rq� PA
�as���C�ieiE#3:�rs4*�k�c3eo4*k3xiria��*��&>t**��kh��44sst.�*�icst��aest�*icsl9ctkokicsts&lst�t;f*:tstic�><e�te**��skisatstst
Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue)
It1/f*����7t'�1titft�YI YL�L�C117t�7t St 7t At it2t}t*5t**AJC l�.St 7t�X` 7�L 7C i1:it.'t�t fl Yt'f[>47t 1t 7t 7t Std*`t*�tlt7t�L�9t]ti�.9C*'�.927•t9t It�l'�C�I�ftlt
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
s
serol*�t�rstst�stst�l*stakiete�ik3cst�t*skiritteiestat&st�c�s�ot$e�iss4skst�Gr42�ic*�:itaeyt:F�aFic�Fsc�kas�Y�e��x:9tot*�k�k�r*knt�ac**�stnk
a
DATE
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the fallowing item: (Please ',print the information)
Item Description: /2. L C E A
4
Praponent (For Issue)
Opponent (Against Issue)
Name,
Address and Affiliation Dame, Address and Affiliation
:,7
gig= W
DATE
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please ;print the information)
Item Descriptio - -
, ,
r-
Propo For Issue opponent '(Against Issue)
ame, Address a d Affi iation Name, Address and Affiliation
r n
J I
4
:p
r
� - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE
fy l
AGENDA ITEM # -
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
'
agenda
"items. The Council
g appropriate sheet for listed but time may k
Please sin on the app p agenda,
wishes to_hear from you on other issues not on tenda. Please contact the
require that we schedule your items for a future agenda. k
City Administrator as to agenda scheduling. Thank you.
f
S,
ITEM DESCRIPTION
NAME, ADDRESS 6 AFFILIATION
s
x,
e
a
l
w
l c
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
;f COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
4.
AGENDA OF: May 14, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: May 10, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: OLCC License Approval
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:
OLCC License Renewal REQUESTED BY: _Applicant
f
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
This application is an annual renewal of a Class A dispenser license.
THE STADIUM CLUB
11445 SW Pacific Hwy.,
Tigard, OR 97223
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Renew
2. Deny
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends renewal.
0439P
j ..
{
t
1
E
j
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
May; 6, 1984
Mr. Paul Williamson
O.L.C.C.
P.O. Box 22297
Portland, OR 97222 -=
SUBJECT: vip's Restaurants Inc,, Stadium Club
11445 S.W. Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon
Dear Mr. Williamson:
I have been asked by Mr. Steve Johnson, on behalf of the applicant, to explain
' the City of Tigard's position on the above license renewal. The matter was
set for routine review and consent approval at the April 23, 1984, City
Council meeting. Mayor Pro-Tem Ken Scheckla asked to table the matter to the
to some allegations he had heard as to a
next meeting on May 14, 1984, ,due
topless bar operation that might move in.
Mr. Johnson has met with City staff and will be appearing before the City
Council on May 14, 1954. The Police Department and other staff will be
recommending for renewal. I understand that the timeline in this case may be
a bit longer than normal. Any assistance on behalf of your agency is
in
continuing this matter until Council consideration on May
appreciated.
Yours truly,
Robert W ,lean
City Ad �nistrator
RWJ/dc(0454p)
cc: Mayor and Council/
Mr. Steve Johnson
12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 872.'_3 PH:6 9 4171
xr.. --, w — — —
t..o
CITY OF TIGARD
MEMORANDUM
April >20, 1984
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development
t
DATE: April 19, 1984
RE: Executive Session —Possible Litigation i
4
Mayor pro tem Scheckla requested that we provide you with an update of an
recent inquiry from an individual ;who may wish to open a topless bar at the i
location of the Stadium Club, 11445 SW Pacific Highway. The individual was
-'advised by my ,office that in order that such a facility might locate at that s
location they must apply for and be granted a conditional use.
Should an application be filed for the Stadium Club facility, within a C-G
General Commercial zone, a conditional use permit is required. An
application would be filed, the staff would review the application against the ,
criteria found in section 18.130.150 A, 5, ;and C (2) and prepare a staff
'
report, and the issue ;would-be heard by the Hearings Officer. The Hearings
Officer would then hold a public hearing on the application. ' A copy of the
conditional use criteria, section 1$.130.150, is attached. ,
Also enclosed for your information is a copy of Chapter 7.56 of the TMC
which relates to Indecent Conduct. The code provisions were adopted in
Joy Theatre in past years when a pr
response to the operation of theior owner ,
operated the facility. '.
This informatioP-is provided to you so that you will be informed of the
-
code. provisions in place should an application be filed. Once an application
is filed the possibility of a law suit is present.
k
e
f
2. Preliminary elevation drawings of each structure.
18 130 120 1_andscaPe Plan
` p The Conditional Use plan proposal shall include:
1 The general location of fences, buffers and screenings;
2. The general location of play areas and common open spaces; '
and
3. The general 'location of existing and proposed plant
materials.
18.130.130 Sign Drawings
Drawings indicating sign location shall be submitted in
accordance with Chapter 18.414 of this Code.
f a
18.130.140 Additional Information Required and Erdaiver of Rec�uirementg
A. The Director may require information in addition to that
required by this Chapter in accordance with ,Section 18.32.080
(A)
B. The Director may waive a .specific requirement for information in
accordance with Section 18.32.080 (B) and (C).
18.130.150 Standard Dimensional Requirements for Conditional Use -TV pe3
A. A Conditional Use proposal shall comply with the standards of
the zoning district in which it is located and the applicable
provision of this Codes or as otherwise provided in standards
that follow.
B. A Conditional Use permit shall not grant variances to the
regulations otherwise prescribed by this Code. A variance
application may be filed in conjunction with the Conditional Use
application and both applications may be heard at the same
hearing.
C. The additional dimensional requirements and approval standards
for Conditional Uses are as follows;
1. Accessory daellirs Unit-
a. A secondary unit may be allowed within an existing
single family detached unit for occupation by a person
related by blood or marriage to the property owner
providing each of the following conditions are
satisfied:
(1) The lot coverage standards of the base zone shall
not be exceeded;
III - 246
(2) There shall be a minimum of 250 gross square feet
of floor area for each occupant, however, there
shall be no more than two occupants and the unit
shall be limited in size to 500 gross square feet.
(3) One of the units shall be occupied by ;the property
owner at all times that the accessory dwelling
unit is occupied. Should the property owner
vacate one of .the units, the accessory unit shall
not be occupied.
(4) All requirements of the basezone shall be
satisfied and :required yard areas shall not be
used for'parking.
(5) The off--street parking requirements; of 10.106
shall be satisfied for the principle dwelling and
one additional space shall be provided for the
accessory dwelling emit.
2. Adult Entertainment.
a.' no adult entertainment establishment shall be k ,
permitted to locate in any residential zoning,
neighborhood commercial, commercial, professional, or
industrial district.
t
b. No adult bookstore or theater shall be 'permitted to �
locate within,500 feet of any: ,
(1) Residential district;
(2) public or-private nursery, pre—school, elementary,
junior, middle or high school;
(3) Day care center, nursery school, convalescent �
home, home for the aged, resident care facility or l
hospital;
4'
(A) Public library;
(5) Public park; or
(6) Religious institution.
C. Distance shall' be measured in a straight line, without
regard to intervening structures, objects or roads,
from the closest point of the structure or portion of
structure containing the use, to the closest portion
of the residential district or property line upon
which a use specified in b, above is listed.
d. Any sign shall comply with the sign requirements,
Chapter 18.114.
111 - 247
7
ration shall be limited to lo:oo a.m. to
e. Hours of ope
1:00 a.m.
f, be
All windows less than 7 feet from the ground shall es
t
covered or screened in such a manner that the sales #
are not visible from the sidewalk
area and inventory
adjacent to the use.
(Doors and windows shall at all times be closed except
g'
for normal ingress and egress.
:
amplified or mechanically reproduced sounds shall
' r
h. No ampof ;
emanate from the e o on
1n in which the
s adult r ti
businesor sis
of the truce
operated; and
i. All adult entertainment establishments shall comply
with all applicable State laws.
3. Automobile and Eaui ent Fleet Stora e. �
allowed.
a.
No buildings or strictures shall be
b, Setbacks:
(1) Setbacks shall be used -cis
ebuts alandscape buffer residential zoning
fie storage
district.
t: Sales/Rental 'Farm
4. Automobile and
E ui ens Heav and
t .
Li ht went
a. Setbacks:
(1) Five feet of the perimeter setback shall be used
for landscaping and screening purposes.
b, Commu-n Recreation and Parks.
a, Setbacks:
(1) RI1 building. setbacks shall be a minimum of 30
feet from any property line.
b. off—street Parking: There are no parking requirements.
�, Heli res: Applicable d3StraCbe�sitedoine accordance rcial ce
industrial zones. Heliports shall
ics Division requirements and the FRA
with the oI?oT Aeronaut
recommended design guidelines.
7. 59etaicle Fuel Sales:
a, Lot size: lo,000 square feet.
ILZ - 240
i
7 . 52 : 280--7 . 56. 010'
{ ± 7.52 280 Public drinking fountain.--Injury prohibited.
It is :unlawful 'for any person to wilfully mark, scratch, dis-
figure, deface, remove or in any mannerinjureany public
drinking fountain, or throw, place or deposit in any cup or
basin of same any cigar stub or cigarette stub, ;or any other
matter or refuse whatever, or obstruct the regular flow of
water thereof in any manner whatever. (Ord. 71-12 §3 (22) ,'
1971)
7 52 290 Signs, lights, call boxes , hydrants injury
prohibited. itis unlawful for any person to wilfully cut, sa
remove, deface or in any manner injure or damage any street
sign,,, any street, bridge or subway light, light fixture, or
standard, or any police or fire call box, or any hydrant, ;.
fence, gate or enclosure, or any part thereof, placed in any
public areas. (Ord. 71-12 §3 (23) ,` 1971) .
7.52. 300 "Penalty for violation. Any person violating
any provision of this chapter, upon conviction shall be pun-
ishedby a fine of not more than five hundred dollars; or by
imprisonment in the city', or county jail for not exceeding six
months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. 71-12
§4, 1971)
Chapter 7.56
INDECENT CONDUCT
Sections:
7.56.010 Sexual touching for a fee--Declarations.
7.56 .020 Sexual touching for a fee--Definitions.
7.56 .030 Sexual touching for a fee--Prohibitions.
7 .56 .040 Sexual touching for a fee--Penalties.
7.56.010 Sexual touching for a fee--Declarations. The
city council of Tigard, Oregon, finds that sexual touching
for a fee, as hereinafter defined, encourages personal
depravity, derogates against public morality and constitues
a public nuisance and such behavior is inimical to the peace,
health, safety and welfare of the people of the city of
Tigard.
In adopting the ordinance codified in this chapter, it
is the intent and purpose to carry out the legislative policy
of the city of Tigard to prohibit such behavior. The provi-
sions of this chapter shall be liberally construed to accom-
plish that purpose. (Ord. 72-62 51, 1972) .
102 (Tigard 2/25/74)
7:56. 020--7;56.040
7.56.020 Sexual touching for a fee--Definitions. For
the purpose of this chapter, words in the ,present tense in-
clude the future, the singular number includes the plural
and' the 'plural number includes the singular. "Shall" is
mandatory and not 'directory. The masculine gender includes
the feminine and neuter and "this chapter includes the text
of this chapter and all amendments hereafter made thereto.
As:used in this chapter, unless the context requires other-
wise, the following words and their derivations shall be
utilized:
(1) "Private parts" means the genital organs or the
external genital procreative organs of a male or female
human being.
(2) "Sexual touching" means any touching of the private
parts of one person by another person or causing one person
to touch the sexual or other intimate parts of another for
the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of
either party.
(3) "Fee" means any recompense, reward, compensation
or item of monetary value ,given, promised or, paid to another
person 'in- consideration of an act or acts of sexual touching
performed or to be performed. (Ord. 72-62 §2 , 1972) .
7.56.030 Sexual touching for a fee--Prohibitions. (a)
No person shall offer to pay, pay, or receive a 'tee as herein
' defined, directly or indirectly in consideration of an act
or acts of sexual touching performed or to be performed with
respect to another person.
(b) No person who manages or control any place of busi-
ness or commercial activity shall cause or permit any agent,
employee or other person under his control or supervision to
participate in conduct prohibited by subsection (a) of this
section.
(c) No person shall solicit, employ or engage in
another, or confederate with another to violate subsection
(a) of this section. (Ord. 72-62 §3, 1972)
7.56.040 Sexual touching for a fee--Penalties. (a)
Violation of any subsection of Section 7 .56 . 030 is punish
able, upon conviction, by a fine not to exceed five hundred
dollars or by imprisonment in the county jail for a period
not to exceed six months, or by both such fine and imprison-
merit.
(b) Each violation of any subsection of Section 7.56 .030
constitutes a separate offense and each day that any person
violates any subsection of Section 7.56.030 constitutes a
separate offense. (Ord. 72-62 §4 , 1972) .
t
102-1 (Tigard 2/25/74)
,r .
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON' r
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
April 23, 1954
AGENDA OF•_ AGENDA
ITEM
Ap 84 16- PREVIOUS ACTI `
ON: OLCC License' Approval
DATE SUBMITTED: 4-16-84 1
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:
OLCC License Renewal REQUESTED BY:
Applicant
c'
t:
CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
DEPARTMENT HEAD: OK:
INFON SUM
RMATIOMARY
k
This application is an annual renewal of a Class A dispenser license
THE STADIUM CLUB
11,445 SW Pacific Hwy., Tigard, OR 97223
71o----
AI;tERNACIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
i Recommend approval and forwarding to OLCC.
Respectfully,
"R,R, A ams
Chief of Police
t
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May 14 AGENDA AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: April 20, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: TURA CLOSEOUT
REQUESTED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK:- CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached is a memo from Attorney Kenneth Elliottoutlining the procedures
necessary for the eventual closeout of the TURA program.
Action necessary at the March 26 meeting:
1) Accept the report :
2) `Adopt ;the Ordinance limiting the number of agency meetings.
By adopting the report and taking the action suggested, the Council will then
follow the calendar outlined by Attorney Elliott until all TURA debts are paid.
At that time the second ordinance terminating TURA should be adopted.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
The City Council should accept the report of Attorney Elliott and adopt the
Ordinance limiting TURA meetings.
SUGGESTED ACTION
I
recommend that the City Council accept Attorney Elliott's report. The Council
TURA meetings.
should also adopt the attached ordinance limiting the number of
s
SULLIVAN & RAMIS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW. 'TO Mayor .Bishop and '!'il��.ird Ci Ly Council
1727 N W HOYT STREET
PORTLAND. OREGON 97209 I/
15031 222-4402 FROM Kenneth M. Elliott Ill 4
RE Termination of Tigard Urban -RenewalAgency
The City Attorney's office was requested to review the status of
TURA and suggest a time line ,and procedure for termination of the
Agency, in response to Ballot Measure No. 51. The Planning Director, ' {
Finance Director and I met on February ,1`3, 1984, and discussed what
must be done to terminate TURA in accordance with 'Oregon statutory �.
requirements.
ORS 457.075 allows the governing body of a municipality to terminate
an urban renewal agency by ordinance if it finds:
1. A need no longer exists for the agency; and
2. All indebtedness to which a portion of taxes is 1
irrevocably pledged for payment under ORS 457.440 (6)
is fully paid.
The City Finance Director has determined that the Agency will not be;
able to pay all of such indebtedness until well into the 84-85 ,fiscal
year. Estimated tax receipts, which had been at $17,000 per year,
have now been reduced to about $15,000 per year.
Because tax income will be inadequate to satisfy all outstanding
obligations prior to close of the 83-84 fiscal year, the Finance
Director has requested a $3,000 budget to fund TURA in the 84-85 fiscal
year. The Agency will need to file its annual report on August 1, 1984 ,
but should have little or no other business before or after that date.
The Planning Department has estimated it will require an additional
5 to 6 hours for its work in preparing the annual report and assistinc_
with termination. The City Attorney' s office has estimated it will
require no more than 5 hours, and probably less than that, unless the
attached draft Ordinances need substantial revision or complications
arise that require additional assistance.
I have set forth below a tentative time line of events leading up
to and including termination of TURA:
1. March 1984 - City Council to adopt Ordinance limiting
the number of agency meetings. (See attached draft
Ordinance) .
2. June 1984 City Council to adopt TURA budget for 84-85
fiscal year.
3 . August 1984 - Agency Board meeting to review and adopt
1984 Annual Report.
a
Mayor Bishop and City Council
`F March :5, 1984
Page 2
4. December 1984 -Finance Director to monitor November 15,
1984 tax receipts.
5. March or June 1985 - Finance Director to monitor February 15
and May 15, 1985 tax receipts and prepare written 'certifica
tion to City Council that all indebtedness has been paid.
6. City Council to adopt ordinance terminating TURA and re-
pealing Title 19 of the Tigard Municipal Code'. (See attached
draft)
KME:dd
3/5/84
cc: original Memorandum to: Mayor Bishop and City Council
Copy to: File
t
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
(' ORDINANCE NO. 84-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 19 TO THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard established the Tigard Urban Renewal
Agency and added Title 19 to the Tigard Municipal Code by Ordinance
No. '81-91, 'adopted October 12, 1981;
WHEREAS, registered voters of the City ;of Tigard, in a special
election held on September 20,; 1983, approved Ballot Measure No.
51, abolishing the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency when legally possible,
on the ground that the need therefor no longer exists in the City;
WHEREAS, Section 19.04 .100 (A) of the Tigard Municipal Code
requires that the Agency shall hold at 'least one (1) meeting per
month
WHEREAS, the Council finds that the Agency no longer has suffi-
cient business to *warrant such monthlymeetings; '
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Tigard does ordain as follows
Section 1: Section 119. 04.100 (A) of the Tigard Municipal Code
shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows:
" (A) the Agency shall hold such meetings as are
necessary to perform its functions_ "
Section 2: This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30)
days following its passage and signature.
PASSED: By the Council by vote of all Council Members
this day of 1984 .
E
Recorder, City of Tigard 4
SIGNED: By the Mayor, this day of , 1984.
Mayor, City of Tigard
G
ORDINANCE NO. 84-
1
t
t
;9P494J�f
a'
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
4k ORDINANCE NO. 84-
s'
t'
AN ORDINANCE TERMINATING THE TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY AND ?.
REPEALING TITLE '19 TO THE TTGARD MUNICIPAL CODE.
i
WHEREAS, the City of. Tigard established the Tigard Urban
Renewal Agency and added Title19 to the Tigard Municipal Code 4;
by Ordinance No. 81-91, adopted octobrr 12 ,1981;
WHEREAS, registered voters of the City of Tigard, in a
special election held on September 20, 1983, approved Ballot
g when
Measure No. 51, abolishing the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency
legally possible, on the ground that the need therefor no longer
exists in the City;
R,
WHEREAS, the City Finance Director has certified that; all in-
g
debtedness to which a portion of taxes is irrevocably pledgedfor
payment under ORS 457.440 (6) has been fully paid and said certi-
fication is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,
z
NOW, THEREFORE, the City , of Tigard does ordain as follows: s
Section l: The Tigard Urban Renewal
Agency is hereby terminated,
Se s
in accordance with ORS 457.075.
Section 2: Title 19 of the Tigard Municipal Code is hereby
repealed in its entirety.
Section 3: This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30)
days following its passage by the Council and signature by the
Mayor
PASSED: By the Council by vote of all Council members
this day of 1984 .
Recorder, City of Tigard
SIGNED: By the Mayor, this
day. of , 1984 .
i�tayor, City of Tigard _--
ORDINANCE NO. 84
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May 14, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: May 10, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:
TURA Closeout REQUESTED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City Council should take a vote to adopt an ;ordinance amending Title 19 of
the TMC which limits the number of Agency meetings required. This is the
first of two ordinances prepared by Attorney"Elliott. The second -memo is
attached for your information, not adoption at this time. This second memo
will be presented to you for adoption when the TURA program is ready for
closeout.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. The Council may adopt the attached ordinance which amends Title 19 of the
TMC.
2. The Council may take no action.
SUGGESTED ACTION
The staff recommends that the Council adopt the attached ordinance amending
Title 19 of the TMC.
j(� 0437P
CI'1'�' C)1' TTGARD, ORb:Gniv
ORDINANCENO. 84-__
TIGARDO
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 19 TO THE ;MUNICIPAL CODE.
r
Y -
WHEREAS,
the City of Tigard established the Tigard Urban Renewal
Agency' and 'addc Title 19 to the Tigard Municipal Code by Ordinance
No. 81-91, adopted October , 12, __ {.
registered voters of the CrovedfBallotaMeasuresNocial
WHEREAS, 1983, pp
election held on September 20, ossible,
51, abolishing the Th�anedUrban
thereforwno longer exists PgnithepCity;
on the ground that t
WHEREAS, Section 19all
(A) of the Tigard Municipal Code
WHEREAS, hold at least one (1) meeting per
requiresthat the Agency sh
month;
WHEREAS,
the Council finds that the Agency no longer has suffi-
cient.business to warrant such monthly meetings;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Tigard does ordain as follows:
Section 1: Section 19.04 .100 (A) of the Tigard` Municipal Code
shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows:
°, (pthe Ag Y
i enc shall hold such meetings as are
„
necessary to perform its` functions."°
all become effective thirty (30)
Section 2: This Ordinance sh
days following its passage and signature.
PASSED: By .the Council by --:---198
vote of all Council Members, 1984
this day of
Recorder, City of Tigard
da of 1984.
SIGNED: By the Mayor, this_,. Y
City of Tigard
Mayor. y
ORDINANCE NO. 84- -
CITY:OF TIGARD, OREGON
E
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: MAY 14, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #:
r
t ;
DATE SUBMITTED: May 4, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: 3/27/84 election`
j
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: RESOLUTION
Sale of GENERAL OBLIGATION CITY REQUESTED BY: J. Widner, Finance
k
BUILDING BONDS Director
t
:
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The voters of the City of Tigard passed a general obligation bond election for
the ;purchase of land and the construction of a Tigard City building March 27,
s 1984.
g
The sale of the bonds is scheduled for June 6, 1984. The attached resolution'
must be acted upon this evening to keep within the timeline for this sale'.
R
t
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
e
n/a
i
SUGGESTED ACTION
e
Pass the attached resolution calling for the sale of $2,200,000.00 general
obligation bonds on June 6, 1984-
E
(0340F)
r
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: MAY 14,' 1984 AGENDA ITEM ,#:
DATE SUBMITTED: May 14,-1984 PREVIOUSACTION: none
ISSUE/AGENDA-TITLE:' AWARD BID FOR
REGISTRAR/PAYING AGENT FOR CITY REQUESTED BY: J. Widner
BONDS
DEPARTMENT HIBAD OK: ' CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Now,that all bonds sold by Oregon municipalities must' be registered, the City
has to choose a Registrar/paying agent for the sale of the $2.2 million
General. 'Obligation Bonds authorized by the voters March 27,;1984.
The City received three quesstimates Friday, May ll, 1984. TheOregon Bank,
First Interstate Bank and U.S. National Bank submitted 'their-best guesses for
the costs over the life of the bonds-twenty years. The Oregon Bank's guess
was $12,000.00 more than both First Interstate and U.S. National Bank.
Since First Interstate and U.S. National guessed similar amounts, the next
step was to compare the service ability. The City has its main checking
account with U.S. National Bank, which will make the payment of bonds and
coupons easier, and we have already established a banking relationship with
U.S. National.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
n/a
SUGGESTED ACTION
Award the position of registrar/paying agent to U.S. National Bank of Oregon.
(0358F)
.:'
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May 14, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: May 10, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: None
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Comprehensive
Plan Amendment (CPA 4-84) REQUESTED BY: Recommendation
WGK Development of Planning Commission
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK:_ CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
s
On April 23, 1984, the City Council after 'a public hearing ,of this application
voted to direct staff to prepare an ordinance with findings in compliance with
the testimony of Mr. ' Anderson. The ordinance is attached for your
consideration. If adopted, it will approve a comprehensive plan change from
CP to R-40 on"4.33:acres `on the northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and Pacific
Highway.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
I. Adopt ordinance attached.
2. Modify ordinance.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adopt ordinance attached.
CITY OF TIGARD, "OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May 14 1984 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: May 10 1984PREVIOUS ACTION Public hearing
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Floodplain Held on April 3Q, 1984
Overlay Ordinance ' REQUESTED BY: City Council
DEPARTMENT READ OK: :CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On April 30 1984, City Council held a public hearing on 'proposed revision
to the Floodplain/Overlay designation on the Comprehensive Plan Map —Land Use.
The planning staff had recommended two alternatives to the Planning
Commission.
The Planning Commission, after a public hearing on April 17th voted to
recommend alternative number two to the City Council.
After discussion at the April 30th City Council meeting, Council voted to
direct staff to prepare an ordinance adopting alternative number two.
4
The ordinance is attached.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION==-=-_--__-___-_
Adopt the attached ordinance.
0437P
_
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May 14, 1984 _ AGENDA ITEMk:
DATE SUBMITTED May 10,` 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION:- Public Hearing
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Community- before City Council on April 30,'`1984
Development Code Revisions REQUESTED BY:
(CPA 10-84)
DEPARTMENT HEAD OIC.: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 17, 1984, and
recommended that 'Counciladopt an ordinance incorporating changes to the
code.
On April 30, 1984, ,the City Council held a public hearing on proposed
r changes to the Community Development Code.
The Council voted at that meeting to direct staff to prepare an ordinance
with the Planning Commission's recommendations for changes to the Code.
The ordinance is attached.
i
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adopt ordinance attached.
0437P
ys
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May .14, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: May 10, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: Discussion on
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 14-84 April `30, 1984
Comprehensive Plan Document REQUESTED BY: Recommendation
of Planning Commission
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On April 30, 1984, the Director of Planning and Development made a report to
City Council on the status of the Comprehensive Plan. There are four
outstanding issues remaining, most of them Goal 10 issues. The staff made a
presentation to the Planning Commission on May 8, 1984 outlining the policy
direction Council had given staff on the four remaining issues. Staff would
like to present alternatives to the remaining issues to Planning Commission on
June 5, 1984 and ask for a recommendation to ouncil for the June 11, 1984,
meeting.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Continue this item to June 11, 1984. (Reopen public hearing before making
motion to continue.)
11 IM
;
CITY 'OF TIGARD, OREGON
i
1 COUNCIL'AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
i
AGENDA OF: May' 14, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #: + r
i
DATE SUBMITTED: 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: None
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Setbacks in
REQUESTED BY: Recommendation
RE
The CG and the CP zones 4
m of Planning Commission
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
During the process of implementing and; administering the Community Development
Code, it has come to staff's attention that the front yard and ;corner Lot
setbacks in the C-G and C-P zones ae inconsistent and limit flexibility of
development. On May 8, 1984, the planning,staffmade ;a presentation to the
Planning -Commission to eliminate the front yard and corner and through lot
setbacks. The developer would still be required to meet Access and Egress
Provisions (Chapter 18.108), Landscaping and Screening Provisions (Chapter
18.106), and Additional Yard Setback Requirements (Chapter 18.96). It is
staff's opinion that these provisions provide the controls on developers which
will ensure quality development. The setbacks are an additional requirement
which limit design flexibility and essentially force all commercial
development into the same site configuration.
The Planning Commission voted 5-2 to recommend to the City Council that front
yard and through and corner lot setbacks be eliminated.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation.
2. Maintain the existing setback requirements.
3. Modify the Planning Commission's recommendation.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adopt the ordinance attached as recommended by the Planning Commission.
0437P
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May 14,- 1984 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: May 10, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: _ None
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Amended
Decision Process (CPA 16-84) REQUESTED BY: Recommendation of
j Planning Commission
DEPARTMENT BEAD OK: ( CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
During the process of implementing and administering the Community; Development
Code, the Planning Staff has determined that an amended decision process might
be.helpful. The amended decision process would be available only on decisions
made by the Planning Director. Any amended decision would have to be filed by
the Planning Director within the ten' day appeal period. The Planning Staff
recommended to the Planning Commission that a new section be added into the
quasi judicial section of the Code (Chapter 18.32) ' outlining' the amended
( decision procedure. The Planning Commission, after a Public Bearing on May 8,
1984, voted unanimously to recommend to Council that the Community Development
Code be amended to allow for the amended decision process. An ordinance
adopting the Planning Commission recommendation is attached.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Adopt the Planning Commission recommendation.
2. Modify the proposal.
3. Leave the ordinance as it exists.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adopt the attached ordinance.
CITY OF TIGARD, 'OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May 14 1984 AGENDA ITEM #: ! �,
DATE SUBMITTED: May 10`, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: . CPA 17-84
Density Transition REQUESTED BY: Recommendation of
Planning Commission
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Section 18.40.040 of the Community Development Code set forth a formula for
calculating a density transition where a` property being developed abuts an
established residential zone. There has been one instance where the density
in the established area exceeded the density allowed in the established area
plan designation and the `developing property with the 1.25 density transition
could have developed at a lower 'density than the abutting established area.
t On May 8, 1984, the Planning Commission voted to recommend to Council that
section 18.40.040 be modified to add a section C. so that the Density
Transition Policy would not apply where the actual density in the abutting
area exceeds the maximum density allowed under the Land Use Plan Map
designation. An ordinance adopting the Planning Commission recommendation is
attached for your consideration.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Adopt the planning Commission recommendation.
2. Retain the Code as it is currently.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adopt the ordinance attached upholding the Planning Commission recommendation.
0437P
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May 14, 1984
AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE 'SUBMITTED May 10, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Recommendation 5/8/84
CPA 14-84 Building Heights REQUESTED BY:
Limits
DEPARTMENT READ`OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Planning Commission reviewed the issue of Building Heights at its meeting
of May 8th. After much discussion involving the Commission, staff, NPO # 6,
and citizens, the Planning Commission recommended an interim change to the
Code which would limit application of 18.98.030 to flag lots hick are not
i_ncluded'-within a subdivision. The interim Code provision_ would be applied
until the planning staff has an opportuni;:y to survey other jurisdictions then r
prepare a series of alternative for the Commission to choose from.
The Planning Department will conduct a survey and prepare alternatives for the
Commission and Council to review in either June or July.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Council may accept the interim Code revisions suggested by the Planning
Commission which relate to 18.98.030 and 18.52.050(E).
2. Council may postpone enactment of the interim changes until staff returns
with a final code revision to address building heights.
SUGGESTED ACTION
The Planning Division recommends that the Council table action on height
limits until the Planning Commission reviews the study of how other
jurisdictions deal with�. height limits on flag lots.
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD,; OREGON
TO: Members oftheCity Council May 10, 1984
FROM: William A. Monahan
SUBJECT: Building Height Limits
On March 12, 1984, the Council asked the Planning Department to review the
p issue of building,heights with the Planning Commission. The item was delayed
until the meeting of May 10, 1984. At, that meeting, discussion centered on
the adequacy of section 18.98.030 of the Community Development' Code, Building
Heights and Flag 'Lots. NPOr # 6 recommended that the section be revised to
eliminate the criteria 'contained in sections 1, 2, and 3 and replace it ,with
new wording which merely says that a house on a flag lot shall not be higher
than the tallest house on an adjoining lot or 25 feet, whichever is less.
The Commission considered the matter and asked the Planning Staff to conduct a
survey of other jurisdictions and report back with alternatives for change.
- Th$ Commission was hesitant to modify the code without written staff
recommendations. Interim steps that the Commission prepared are:
1. Limitation of 18.98.030 to only those lots in existing
neighborhoods such as infill flag lots on those created by minor
land partitions. Thus, any flag lots in new or developing
subdivisions would not be affected.
2. Revise 18.98.030 A line five to read "30 feet" in place of "35
feet".
3. Revise 18.52.050 (E) third line to read "30 feet" in place of
"35 feet".
The planning staff feels that although the interim solution are a step in the
right' direction, since the Planning Commission intends to take further action
as soon as the staff prepares its report, the best procedure to follow at this
time is to postpone adoption of changes until the Commission makes a complete
recommendation.
If the Council determines that interim steps should be taken, however, the
staff recommends that item 1, 2, and 3 above be adopted.
Attached for your review are sections 18.98.010 18.98.030. of the Code and
j
NPO # 6 comments.
l
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission May;4, 1984
FROM: NPO # 6
SUBJECT: Suggested Changes to Development Code
Section -18.98-030 Building [:eights and Flag Lots
This section of the 'code has come under increased scrutiny because of
construction at 14185 SW 98th Court'. The NPO has found the true intent of
this section somewhat unclear and subject to misinterpretation. The NFO feels
the true intent is to make flag lot heights more restrictive than standard
lots.
Perhaps the following wording can clarify this section of the code:
18.98:030
A. The maximumheight for a single—family duplex, - attached or
multiple family residential ^structure on a flag; lot :or a lot
having sole access from an accessory private drive or easement
` shall be no higher than the tallest house on an adjoining lot or
25 feet whichever is less.
This wording accurately describes our intent to make building heights on
flag lots more restrictive, but we are willing to work with the Commission if
further clarification is required.
All other wording is deleted.
0402P
Own
18.98 BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITATIONS,_EXCEPTIONS
t 18.98.010 Projections Not Used for Human Habitation
Projections such as chimneys, spires, domes, elevator shaft
housings, towers excluding TV dish receivers, aerials, flag
poles and other similar objects not used for human occupancy,
are not subject to the building height limitations of this Code.
18.98.020 Building Height Ettceptons
A. Any buildinglocated in a non—residential zone may be built to a
maximum height of 75 feet provided:
1. The total floor area of the building does not exceed one
and 1 1/2 the;area of the site
2. The yard dimensions in each case are equal to at least 1/2
of the building height of the principal structure;
3. The approval of this exception is a part of the, approval of
the conditional use allowed under Chapter 19.130; and
4. The structure is not abutting a residential zoning district.
18 s8 030 Building Heights and Flaq Lots
A. The maximum height for a single-family, duplex, attached or
multiple family residential structure on a flag lot or a lot
having sole access from an accessway, private drive or easement
shall be 1 1/2 stories or 25 feet, whichever is less, except
that the maximum height- may be 2 1/2 stories or 35 feet,
whichever is less, provided:
1. The proposed dwelling otherwise complies with the
applicable dimensional requirements of the zoning district;
o R
2. A residential structure on any abutting lot either is
located 50 feet or more from the nearest point of the
subject dwelling, or the residential structure exceeds
1 1/2 stories or 25 feet in height on any abutting lot; and
3. Windows 15 feet or more above grade shall not face dwelling
unit windows or patios on any abutting lot unless the
proposal includes an agreement to plant trees capable of
mitigating direct views without loss of solar access to any
dwelling unit, or that such trees exist and will be
preserved.
B. Where an agreement is made to plant trees capable of mitigating
direct views, the agreement shall be deemed a condition of
approval under the provisions of Section 18.32.250 (F).
III — 158
G. The tree planting agreement shallbe a condition' of '(SITE
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW) for '3 or more attached units or =a multiple
family residential structure, or for single detached units, 1
?` duplex or 2 attached residential units, at the issuance of
building permits.
i
a
IIS — 159
M
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: 5-14-84 AGENDA ITEM
DATE SUBMITTED: PREVIOUS ACTION: N.A.
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:
Accept bids on Ro`l er REQUESTED BY: Jerry McNurlin
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
City of Tigard requested sealed bids for; the purchase of one Roller
under the Local Contract Review Board Rules (L.C.R.B .) 40.000 compet-
itive bidding procedure .
Only one quote was received from Pacific Pioneer Equipment for $6 ,695 .
Y_ Three other firms declined to bid.
Adequate funds of $9,500. was budgeted for the purchase of this equip-
ment in acdount number 05-02130-705 .
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
-temesmr_naae vcae nt-rmnax va es s.............. c
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends council accept the bid of Pacific Pioneer Equipment
in the amount of $6, 695. for the purchase of one vibratory roller.
i
ffi
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF:
5-14-84 AGENDA ITEM
DATE. SUBMITTED:
PREVIOUS ACTION: N.A.
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:
Accept bid on Patch Truck REQUESTED BY: Jerry McNurlin
I
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
�•
INFORMATION.SUMMARY
City of Tigard requested sealed bids for the purchase of one Patch
Truck under 'Local Contract Review Board Rules (L .C.R.B .) 40.000 comp-
e'titive' bidding procedure .
Five quotes were received, three were "no bid" the other two were from
Pacific Pioneer Equipment for $47 ,495 , & D.S .U. Peterbilt & GMC Inc . for
$46, 263.
$38,000. was budgeted for this equipment. This is the second time this
equipment has been bid & come in over estimates . All of the $38,000 ..
came from the 2 year Serial Levy for maintenance & maintenance equipment.
Staff proposes to supplement this $383000 . with $2 ,805 , not used in the
purchase of the roller & with an additional $5 ,48. from the remaining
road levy.
05-02130-706 $38,000.-
05-02130-705 2,805 ,
le
05-02130-908 5 ,48
$46,263.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
�azgawmts .................... us avass^===.aaacra=a ssc maasm sn:aa;=zeaocscs
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends Council accept low bid of D.S.U. Peterbilt & GMC Inc.
in the amount of' $46 ,263 .00 for the purchase of Patch Trucks
hF CITY OF :TIGARD. OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: 5-14-84
AGENDA ITEM h: `
DATE: SUBMITTED: PREVIOUS ACTION: N.A.
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: _
Accept P.W. bid on Pole Build- REQUESTED BY: Jerry McNurlin'
in.g
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City of Tigard requested sealed bids for the purchase of one 321X46`
Pole Building under Local Contract Review Board Rules (L .C.R.B .) 40 .000
competitive bidding procedures .
Two bids were received, one from Econo-Fab.-Buildings for $14,550. and
ew
one from Parker Poles for $12,076.
Sufficient funds were budgeted for the purchase of the building and
come from the following account numbers : '
05-02120-702 -$ 6,038.00.
05-02130-702 6 ,038 .00
$12 ,076.00
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
v
ffiHiID dI�CEB$Gyp q��iGRSS tffi ffiyya,Rf2 tevSLRRRffiffiRst at�afsrffiiCffi�C=$==^—=ffi==C=SS=A===ffiavffiCffi=CiL aC10Ei,Gt Xq�S�Cx3 s2=IICU
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends council accent low bid of Parker Pole in the amount of
specified.
$ 12,076.00 for the purchase of one Pole Building as
Eno
CITY OF-TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF `� -I �(� cad AGENDA ITEM
DATE SUBMITTED: 4/6/34 PREVIOUS ACTION: Plarpri or Maintenance
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ' ACCeptdnce December 6 1982
of LaMancha Estates Subdivision REQUESTED BY: Developer & Fnginppring
department
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATIONSUMMARY
This project is located south of Hamback Park off Hall Blvd. The Developer
(James R. McGehee, Inv.) has completed all repairs on the public improvements
within this 'subdivision and has asked that the city accept them.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
The Engineering Department recommends that the City Council accept this project
and release,the Developer's Maintenance Bond.
James R. McGehee Investments
P.O. Box 25571 '
Portland, OR 97225
11 R
a:
O'DONNELL. DATE May 10, 1984
SULLIVAN & RAMIS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW TO Mayor and Members of the Council
1727 N.W. HOYT STREET
PORTLAND. OREGON97209
(5091 222-4402 FROM City Attorney' s _Office
RE Regulation> of Mobile Homes
I,
THE QUESTION
You asked for an overview of the laws and regulations which would
affect the movement of mobile homes in the mobile home park owned
by Southern Pacific Railroad.
Please note there are strict standards applicable to ;the construc-
tion, sale or lease of a mobile home. This memorandum is confined
to the 'movement of a mobile home which is to remain in the same
ownership.
II, LEVELS OF REGULATION
There are four levels of regulations applicable to mobile homes:
1. Oregon Revised Statutes.; The statutes do not regulate
the -movement:_of mobile homes, but they do regulate most other
aspects of mobile homes; i.e. , construction standards, mobile
home park construction and the sale or lease of mobile homes.
2. Oregon Administrative Rules. The rules do not regulate
the movement of mobile homes.
3. Tigard Zoning Code. The Zoning Code (g 18.94.030)
regulates mobile homes. (See attached copy of regulations.) The
Code does not prohibit the movement of mobile homes if the
mobile home complied with state law at the .time it was built.
Specifically note 5 18.94.030 (2) (1) , which simply states the
mobile home must comply with the standards in effect at the time
the mobile home was constructed. Therefore, a mobile home
constructed in 1960 need only comply with 1960 standards.
4. Mobile Home Park Rules. Mobile home parks may adopt
their own standards and rules. The law does not preclude them
from doing this. In fact, most parks have strict standards and
the standards would probably preclude the movement of the mobile
site to another mobile home park
homes from the Southern Pacific
in Tigard.
III. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
1. Many of the other jurisdictions in the state have adopted
minimum standards which probably would affect where the mobile
homes could be moved.
2. The federal government has established construction
standards; however, the standards apply to new mobile homes or
o the reconstruction of mobile homes.
AB:mch
5/10/84
4
18.94. MANUFACTURED/MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS
{ 18.94.010 Purpose
The purpose of this Chapter is to establish criteria for the
placement of manufactured/mobile homes in mobile - home
subdivisions and park developments within the City of Tigard.
18.94,020 Manufactured/Mobile Home Subdivision Standards
A. In addition to the standards of the zoning district in which the
project is 'located and other standards of this Code, a
manufactured/mobilehome.'subdivision proposal shall:
1. Comply with all applicable State standards and other City
standards for the "subdivision '(See 18.150)
2. Satisfy all the standards of the applicable zoning
district, and the provisions of 18.92; and
3. Be limited to manufactured/mobile home housing types. All
other types of residential units shall not be permitted.
18.94.030 Manufactured/Mobile Home Park Standards
A. The design of the proposed mobile 'home park shall be submitted
to the Planning Department for review in accordance with Chapter
18.120 (SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW) and Chapter 18.130 (CONDITIONAL
USE) where applicable.
8. The design for the manufactured mobile home park shall conform
to all applicable State standards established by the State of
Oregon, Dept. of Commerce mobile home park standards.
C. The manufactured/mobile home park shall:
1. Have a minimum lot area of one acre.
2. Have a minimum frontage of 100 feet.
3. Have a minimum depth of 150 feet.
4. Have a front and rear yard setback of 25 feet.
5. Have a side yard setback of 10 feet, except on a corner lot
the side yards shall be 25 feet.
6. Have a minimum of 60 square feet of outdoor recreation
area, suitably improved for recreational use, provided for
each unit' exclusive of required yards. Each recreation
area shall have a minimum size of 2,500 square feet.
7. Have landscaping equivalent to 20 percent of the
manufactured/mobile home park area.
III -- 151
S. Be partially screened from the public right-of--way and
adjacent residential areas by a combination of a sight
obscuring fence, vegetation, berm or any combination of the
i,
above as approved by the approval authority. Except, that
within the required front 'yard, 'any fence shall not exceed
3 feet in height.
Evidonce shall be provided that the park will be eligible for a
certificate of sanitation required by State law.
E. Each site shall be adequately serviced by public facilitiessuch
as water supply, sewers, sidewalks, and improved streets.
F Each unit shall be provided with a water, sewer, and; electrical
connection. The ,electrical connection shall provide for 110 and
220 volt service.
all be
G. No mobile home, accessory' building or other structure hding
closer than 10 feet from another mobile home, accessory
or other structure.
H. No structure shall exceed 25 feet in height.
y; Each mobile home placed ;in a mobile home park or subdivision
shall meet the following standards shall be inspected by the
Building Official; and
1. A state insignia indicating compliance with Oregon state
mobile home construction standards in effect at the time of
manufacture and including compliance for reconstruction of
equipment installation made after manufacture shall be
displayed on each mobile home;
2. Each mobile home shall be in good repair, notwithstanding
deterioration which may have occurred due to misuse,
neglect, accident or other cause;
3. Each mobile home shall contain a water closet, lavatory,
shower or tub, and a sink in a kitchen or other food
preparation space; and
q. Each mobile home shall be installed under the provisions of
the administrative rules adopted by the Director of
Commerce and administered by the State Bui.lding Code
Division.
J. Each vehicular way in a mobile home park shall be named and
appearance to those used
marked with signs which are similar in app
to identify public streets; and
1. A map of the named vehicular ways shall be provided to the
applicable fire district, the police department, and the
public works department.
t
7CZI - 152
K. more
`a mobile home space or permanent structure in the park is
more .than 500 feet from a public fire hydrant, the park shall
provide: '
1, water supply lines designed with fire hydrants which shall
be provided withinfive hundred feet of such space or
structure; and
2. Each hydrant within the park shall be located on a
vehicular way :and shall conform in design and capacity to
City and the applicable water district standards.
!. Each manufactured/mobile home in a mobile home park or
subdivision shall have a continuous , perimeter skirting installed
pursuant to State regulations, which shall be of the same
material and finish as the exterior of the mobile home.
M. The wheels,' tongue and traveling lights of each
manufactured/mobile home in a mobile home park or subdivision
shall be removed upon installation of unit.
N. There shall be no outdoor storage of furniture, tools,
equipment, building materials, or supplies belonging to the
occupants or management of the park.
p. Accessways or driveways -shall' be lighted in accordance with City
standards.
P. Primary access to the manufactured/mobile home park shall be
from a public street and shall be in accordance with Chapter
18.112 (Access and Egress); and
1. Where necessary, additional street right-of-way shall be
dedicated to the City to maintain adequate traffic
circulation.
2. Access driveways connecting units to a public street shall
have a width of not less than 36 feet, of which not less
than 20 feet shall be paved.
3. Driveways shall be designed to provide for all maneuvering
and parking of units without encroaching on a public street.
Q, The maximum number of manufactured/mobile homes in the park or
subdivision shall not exceed the amount calculated in Section
18.92.
i8.9p.040 Nonconforming Mobile Homes_
A. Mobile home parks existing at the adoption of this ordinance not
meeting the standards set forth herein shall be considered
nonconforming and are subject to the standards set forth in
Section 18.132.040 (D) of this Code.
B. Nonconforming mobile homes in such perks may be replacedwith
like mobile homes that meet the standards of section 18.94.030
when they are moved or destroyed.
III - 153
�.�. �-�,,,:,'�,,�`•d.�...�s::� -�cr:..�-=:yrs�.:se.awE,«�-. �r��--.d ... _'�"'°'"®"' -_"`_"- - - ---
CITY OF TIGARD,,OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
d'7
AGENDA ITEM #:AGENDA OF: May 14, 1984 + l
DATE SUBMITTED: May 7, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: "ACCEPTANCE OF
CONSULTANT AND BOND COUNCIL FEES FOR REQUESTED BY: J. Widner
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND ISSUE
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: 4j CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Pursuant to passage of the $2,200,000 general obligation bond, the City will
be selling bonds on June 6, 1984. The cost of selling these bonds includes
consultant and bond'counsel fees.
Foster & Marshall/American Express, Inc. fees for financial consulting will be
approximately $5,900.
Ragen, Roberts, O'Scannlain, Robertson & Neill fees for bond counsel zzr`ve
r�i-�r�.�z�.. *�a�T $5,500.
�'14T" 'TO Q.l(CPP�
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
n/a
SUGGESTED ACTION
It is recommended that Council approve the expenditures for the financial
consultant and bond counsel.
C0344F3
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON;
f.,
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: May 14, 1984 AGENDA ITEM
DATE SUBMITTED: May 10, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution
For Whitlach Condemnation - 72nd REQUESTED BY: City Attorney's Office
Avenue
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City Attorney's office has recommendedthe Council initiate 'condemnation
proceedings on the Whitlach property in the 72nd Avenue LID.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Recommend passage of the attached resolution to allow Attorney's office to
begin condemnation proceedings,
lw/1541 A
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: Ma 14; 1984
AGENDA ITEM #
DATE SUBMITTED: May 10, `1984
PREVIOUS ACTION:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution`
For Ga a Condemnation - 72nd Ave. REQUESTED BY: City Attorney's office
DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATOR:
HEAD ,OK:
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City Attorney's office has recommended the Council initiate condemnation
proceedings on the Gage property in the 72nd Avenue LID.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Recommend passage of the attached resolution to allow_Attorney's office to
begin condemnation proceedings.
1w/1541 A
WwasWW=W A=WA=cxw=== __
LEE
n
t
CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF:
May 14., 1984
AGENDA`ITEM
t
May 8, 1DATE SUBMITTED:
984 PREVIOUS ACTION: Approved Restaurant
Dispenser Class C
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:
f
OLCC ApplicationREQUESTED BY: Applicant
, �
DEPARTMENT BEAD Oil: --
CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
i
INFORMATION SUMMARY
RRISON and ENO CORPORATION, is applying for a'greater
The applicant, HA
sently have a Restaurant Dispenser Class C
privilege license. They pre
license; they are requesting a Class A license. The former licenses
limits service of distilled spirits as incidental to meals; the Class A
license does not limit the service of drinks with meals.
Location: -STEAKS N-' SUCH
11290 S.W. Bull Mountain Rd. , Tigard, Oregon
s ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Recommend approval and forwarding to OLCC.
Respectfully,
R.B. Adams
Chief of Police