Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Packet - 07/18/1983
f.- TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an t SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate JULY 18, 1983, 7:30 P.M. sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ask to be recognized by the Chair. Non-agenda LECTURE ROOM items are asked to be kept to 2 minutes or less and are heard at the discretion of the Chair. 1. SPECIAL MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff, Council & Audience For Non-Agenda Items Unde- Open Agenda 2. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 2.1 Approve Declaration of Surplus Property Resolution No. 83-64 2.2 Approve Brewer Annexation Request For Boundary Commission Resolution No. 83-65 2.3 Approve Street Vacation Request - Christ The King Church - Resolution No. 83-66 2.4 Approve Initiation of SW 68th Avenue Sanitary Sewer LID #42 Petition - Resolution No. 83-67 2.5 Approve progress payment #12 for 72nd Avenue LID #21 - $90,132.72 ( 3. PARK BOARD WORKSHOP o Director of Planning & Development 4. SENSITIVE LANDS DEVELOPMENT CODE WORKSHOP o Director of Planning & Development 5. RESOLUTION NO. 83- Appointing Planning Commission Member o City Administrator 6. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under 1.2 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting. cow 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will adjourn to Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1)(e) to discuss land acquisition matters. 8. ADJOURNMENT f COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 18, 1983 (lw/0316A) r � TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - JULY 18, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors: Tom Brian, Kenneth Scheckla and Ima Scott ; City Staff: Frank Currie, Director of Public Works ; Doris Hartig, City Recorder; Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Director of Planning & Development ; and Ed Sullivan, Legal Counsel. 2. CALL TO STAFF, COUNCIL & AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA (a) City Administrator noted additional hand-outs for consent agenda. He suggested under open agenda Council consider Councilor Scott's request regarding purchase of Oregon Blue Book. He requested adding under "Consent Agenda Item 2.6 Receive and File" letter. from Bob Bledsoe of NPO #3. Under agenda Item #5 he requested adding resolutions making appointments to Park and Library Boards. (b) Edith Doty, 14465 S.W. 80th Place, spoke to the closure of S.W. 80th Place and expressed her desire that the road remain open. o Council and staff discussed the issue, with the City Administrator commentin- staff was aware of Doty's concern, but no formal notice had been given for discussion at this Council meeting. There was discussion by Council and by staff regarding the proper procedure and if the request by Doty was amending the Planned Development. City Attorney disclosed the fact that he had represented a client before being city attorney on this matter. He further suggested the item be set over to give time for review and make a determination as to the proper procedure to follow. o Chris Vanderwood representing the NPO submitted copies of petition circulated in the neighborhood supporting closure of the road. (c) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott, a staff memo be prepared for July 25, 1983, verifying the opinion of Police and Fire Departments ; the Planning Director, and Attorney advise Council of the process that would be required to amend the plan. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. o John Smets, 6330 S.W. Bonita Road, submitted 2 letters to add to consent agenda regarding 72nd Ave. LID and one regarding appointment to NPO groups. o Councilor Scott requested agenda Items 2.2 Brewer Annexation and 2.5 72nd Ave. LID Progress payment, be pulled for discussion. (d) Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to remove Items 2.2 and 2.5 from Consent Agenda. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 3, RESOLUTION N0. 83-64 SURPLUS RESOLUTION MA MATERIALS THE BE SOLD AT CITY PUBLIC AUCTII ON.�ING (a) Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (F. RESOLUTION N0. 83-65 A RESOLUTION FURTHERING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "A" AND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B" AS ATTACHED (BREWER) property owners had signed the (a) Councilor Scott inquired if all prop Y petition. Staff responded this was a 100% signed annexation. econded by Councilor Scheckla to approve. (b) Motion by Councilor Scott, s Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. VACTION OF A ION 5. RESOLUTION NO. 83-66 A RESOLUTIONSTREETRNING A 50 0-FOOT WIDE DEDICATED PUBLIC S.W. 114TH WASHINGTON 3 RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, COUNTY, OREGON. (a) Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 6, RESOLUTION NO. 83-67 DECLARING AN INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AN AREA DETERMINED TO BE A SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 42 FOR S.W. 68TH PARKWAY (FRANKLIN TO ATLANIA) DESCRIBING THE PROBABLE TOTAL COST THEREOF; DEFINING THE BOUNDARY OF THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITTED AND ASSESSED; APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AND WORK AND SETTING ESTIMATES OF THE CITY'S ENGINEER; PUBLIC HEARING AND DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE THEREOF. (a) Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve. o Geraldine Ball, representing herself and DJB properties of 11515 S.W. ll the 91st Avenue, Tigard, inquired if this resolution included a eWardin properties when originally considered and specifically property. Staff could not respond and the City Administrator recommended Mrs. Ball check with Public Works Department regarding the specific boundaries of the district. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 1, PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 18, 1983 7. APPROVE PROGRESS PAYMENT 412 FOR 72ND AVENUE LID #21 - $90,132.72 o Councilor Scott referred to her previous request that when a request for payment is presented that a progress report be attached. In her opinion the work is not proceeding very well. City staff responded as to specifics of work being done and noted there will be a tour of the project by City Council members next Monday night. (a) Motion by Councilor Scott to delay approval of payment until she has a chance to go over support documentation submitted tonight. Motion died for lack of second. o There was further discussion regarding Council approval of progress i payments of projects under City approved contracts. (b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Mayor Bishop to approve d LID in amount of $90,132.72. progress payment #12 for 72n t Motion approved by 3-1 vote of Council present with Councilor Scott voting NAY. i 8. RECEIVE AND FILE o Bob Bledsoe letter - NPO #3 o John Smets two letters regarding 72nd Ave. LID and letter concerning t appointment to NPO groups. (a) Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to receive j f and file. a Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. i E 9. PARK BOARD WORKSHOP j o Workshop was cancelled as there were no representatives from Park Board present. Meeting to be rescheduled. 10. SENSITIVE LANDS DEVELOPMENT CODE WORKSHOP o Director of Planning and Development noted his memo and called attention to the matrix as well as sections of Tigard Municipal Code dealing with sensitive lands. He noted the sections where the Hearings Officer makes the decision and sections where the Planning Director makes the decision. The discussion was to determine when the Hearings Officer would have to over-rule or fill in for the Director on decisions regarding drainage ways. He noted specific sections explaining the distinction between the Hearings Officer and Director. o Frank Tepedino, Chairman, commented the whole issue of the floodways r is a learning process as land develops. Minor items come up and th E- purpose of the discussion tonight is to take care of some of the minor problems and not make the applicant go through the full hearing process routine. PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 18, 1983 o Planning Commissioner Don Moen stated he felt it is appropriate for the Director to have some jurisdiction. He was concerned if the Hearings Officer should hear issues regarding the 100-year floodplain. He requested discussion regarding criteria for making findings. Commissioner Moen also inquired if it was the intent of Council to relieve the Planning Commission of some of the burden by having the Hearings Officer and Director handle some of the responsibility. Staff responded regarding approval, based on standards within the code. o Discussion followed regarding the use of the Hearings Officer and the responsibility given by the City; the concern of letting go of some of responsibility and for some safeguards for review be written into the code. o Discussion then centered on allowing development in the floodplain. The Planning Commission requested Council input in developing a floodplain policy. They discussed allowing fill in commercial or industrial property vs. the property owner who cannot prove an economic need. o Councilor Brian discussed Council thinking regarding encroachment in the floodplain and allowing commercial/industrial encroaching. He suggested there was a softening of policy by Council regarding the encroaching issues. The issues to be considered are selective control alteration needed to improve what we have and the project needs to have a net benefit to retention and flow capacity. o Attorney Sullivan commented on the division between residential vs. commercial/industrial development being allowed. He noted the policy now does that, but how far and what classification of use is a matter for Council policy and decision. The questions is does the responsibility as outlined by the Planning Director memo meet with Council approval. o Director requested Council also review the fee revision schedule. o Commissioner Moen stated he would like to see the 100-year floodplain heard by the Planning Commission and a report from the Hearings Officer on matters heard. o Chairman Tepedino suggested Planning Commission review the issues discussed and then forward their recommendation to Council. 11. RESOLUTION APPOINTING PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER (a) Mayor Bishop noted two names previously submitted by Selection Committee as Brent Bishop and Mark S. Zimmel. (b) Motion by Councilor Scott to disregard both names and continue interviewing people who are interested. Motion seconded by Councilor Brian. PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 18, 1983 o There was discussion by Council regarding opening up the selection r process and soliciting of more applicants. Staff reported there were r two citizens who have expressed interest in an appointment. Councilor Brian commented he did not want it taken as a reflection of the two applicants, but would like to see a broader base of applicants. Councilor Scott reported Councilor Cook did not support the appointment of Bishop or Zimmel. o Council instructed staff to put notices in the newspapers and newsletter, accepting applications up to August 5 and making the appointment in mid August. (c) Motion by Councilor Scott to amend her motion to accept applications to August 5, 1983 for Planning Commission, seconded by Councilor Brian. Amended motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 12. RESOLUTION 83-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO THE TIGARD PARK AND RECREATION BOARD. (a) Appointing Jim Blaurock for term expiring December 31, 1985. (b) Motion by Councilor Brian to approve, seconded by Councilor Scheckla. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 13. RESOLUTION 83-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENT TO THE TIGARD .LIBRARY BOARD. (a) Appointing Peggy Ober for term expiring June 30, 1987. (b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve. $ i r Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. s "s 6 14. OPEN AGENDA 14.1 PARK ATTENDANTS - COOK PARK o Councilor Scott reported on visit to park and stated she was very pleased with the park caretakers. 14.2 ENGLEWOOD GREENWAY t o City staff reported on volunteer neighborhood effort working on the e greenway. The City is using heavy equipment to clean up the greenway and the citizens are doing a lot of the hand work. City staff is coordinating projects and work in specific areas with the goal to improve the area so the City can maintain the ground. Staff distributed pictures of the work in progress. PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 18, 1983 S Attorney Sullivan introduced Josephine Carr, a representative from the United the City Attorney and welcomed her to the City of Kingdom, who is working for Tigard. 14.3 OREGON BLUE BOOK REQUEST o Council direction regarding the purchase City Administrator requested of books. O Council directed staff order S copies. S 14.4 A LEVY z o Councilor Scott voiced her opinion regarding the A Levy. She commended she did not approve of the way the matter was handled and if it ever happens again that all of Council will be informed and be f given opportunity to give an opinion. She noted it is time for Council to start working together more closely instead of fighting. o Mayor Bishop complimented the City Administrator for the quick action taken in a very critical situation. In his opinion, the City Administrator deserves an A+ rating for the professional way it was handled and the citizens should be pleased and satisfied. 's o A question was raised from the audience how much tax relie was t involved. City Administrator stated the fiscal impact is negligible and less than the cost of holding another election. The City had rate of $1.19 and the actual cost will be lower. estimated a tax Council requested when information is received, it be distributed in F the City newsletter. 14. MEETING ADJOURNED 10:20 P.M. k City Recorder 7 DFE i ATTEST: E i !f! (DH:pm/0398A) I i PAGE 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 18, 1983 i i 'f i d TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7_61+7 BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice N JC G J BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 rr®F 9R`, Legal Notice Advertising T/C • ARD • ❑ Tearsheet Notice > City of Tigard • P .O . Box 23397 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Tigard, Oregon 97223 • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. being first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tig a-r r7 Time s a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Ti ga rrl in the aforesaid county and state; that the a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for successive and consecutive in the following issues: July 14 , 1983 Sub§Z�ribecf ands to.before methis u 1 8 Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 3/16/87 The ojo ct for'Xour leptt AFFIDAVIT iFortt►a3rl f i c# 1 a o�xit e10 t COL3Nd '£f:Yt�b ArI � [ 3G t {tom. =*. ,• ��Ygy ��'.tiJ►�,S'ty'�{I. i133,.7. p P*c��.�.}rte r -i�]con.l�.dYs.:s la+Lav"sfaz � Pug .F�i'b"hi ioSemi i+arri7aiA.D2F. bus it Park Vn law w Da to JlLLy_ l 5 1 Q83 C T wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your na.'ne) TO AUDIENG� AOR I�QN :AGE ?A I TglS ..UNOR'OPE14 AGEIo;DA :lame, Address & Affiliation Item Description tz G(. - ` A r� v Cc � �' .� /�«�jy •�. ?�c% .lis c AcG -y �~ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: _11 IV 1R 1983 AGENDA ITEM #: , DATE SUBMITTED: _July 14, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Declaring Surplus Property For Auction REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Each year the City declares any surplus property (items which are no longer useable by the City) which will be sold at the annual auction. This year the auction will be held on July 30, 1983 at 1:00 P.M. at Cook Park under the supervision of Chief Adams. C . I t ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED E N/A r i E SUGGESTED ACTION Motion by Council to approve Resolution No. 83-64 which declares surplus property to be sold at the auction on the 30th of July. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: July. 18, 1983 AGENDA ITEM 4: 2.2 DATE SUBMITTED: July 14, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: none ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Brewer Annexation REQUESTED BY: Dwight and Marissa Brewer DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Dwight and Marissa Brewer have requested annexation of 2.83 acres of property to the City. The property is contiguous to current City boundaries. All propety owners involved consented to the annexation Approval of this annexation will not create an island. a:acaczastaaa::asaac Qs:s:a:saaasaacaxa�a.aaa==a.aca==ca.a..aa—aa==aascsa:.aasazz.ac. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Deny the request a f SUGGESTED ACTION s t t_ Approve the resolution and forward the annexation request to the Boundary Commission. ? X x CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: July. 18, 1983 AGENDA ITEM @: 2.3 DATE SUBMITTED: July 14, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: none ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 114th St. Vacation REQUESTED BY: Christ the King Luthern Church DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: -- INFORMATION SUMMARY Christ the King Lutheran Church has requested vacation of a portion of S.W. 114th St. The vacation of right of way requested will not landlock any property. sas:sss:as:sssaacsass:ssssssssasasasasssaa:aaaaacsasaaa:as:asaasass:ansa:aaa:aassas ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Deny the request. sraaassastsavarsaasssassssa aasaaaaaa a.='sa------aaaasaa aaaasaaa:asaaraaaassacaaasaaaaa SUGGESTED ACTION l�. Approve the resolution setting the public hearing on the vacation for August 22, 1983. t t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON f COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: July 18, 1983 AGENDA ITEM #: Consent t DATE SUBMITTEQ: July 12, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: Described Below ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution of F Intent to Create an L. I .D. RE: S.W. 68th REQUESTED BY: Doris Hartig Parkway San. Sewer LID #42 DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY This resolution was previously unanimously passed by the Council on June 27, 1983. It is necessary to pass it again as a housekeeping measure, to provide for "more appropriate (form) verbage" , in accord with the City Attorney's recommendation. saa=max=ssszxs==sax=ss=ss==xcxm=xxxxx- -�_--'- ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Table the Resolution s=assazxs=cx==xxx=a=s=sx===_-=x ------------------------------- SUGGESTED ACTION Passage of said Resolution i S.W. 68th PARKWAY SANITARY SEWER L.I.D. # 42 ;Z•.i SCOPE: >:.. .. This.-report summarizes staffs' evaluation of the feasibility of constructing a :-- ,public main-line sanitary sewerage facility running generally north-south along .i! ;..,;j- - S.W. 68th Parkway, from S.W. Franklin Street to S.W. Atlanta Street, serving lands situated adjacent to 68th Parkway and lands immediately easterly thereof, within . the eastern protion of the area commonly known as the Tigard Triangle. LID BOUNDARY: ^i The proposed L.Z.D. is located in the northeast quarter of Section 1, T2S, R1W, W.M. and in the Southeast quarter of Section 36 TlS RIW W.M. ; see Fi re .#l. All tax lot numbers are from Washington County Assessor's maps. The proposed L.I.D. bound- >. ary encompasses only those parcels of land which directly benefit by installation of i the sewerage facility by immediate availability of service to each ownership (the ;r`:`•' term "ownership" is more specifically defined under the topic heading "Ownerships" ) . EXISTING CONDITIONS The relationship of the proposed sanitary sewerage improvement and the district comprehensive land use plan is shown on figure ##2. Generally, the land slopes downward, laterally, across the project, from East to West, at an approximate 7% grade in the northerly portion of the project area and at h" an aEproximate 4% grade in the southerly portion of the project area; also, the land slopes downward longitudinally along the length of the project, from north to south, at an approximate 3% grade. Parcels of land within the project area are, for the most part, undeveloped. Older, single family dwelling units are acattered along S.W. 68th Parkway. Said Parkway is a sixty foot wide dedicated public right-of-way and, likewise, is for the most part, undeveloped also; through vehicular travel therealong is not possible due' to 68th'p alternating unimproved and semi-improved (gravel) segmentation. i €� The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has received bids for construction of roadway improvements along Atlanta Street and along 68th Parkway as a part of the red I-S freeway improvements (in the vicinity of Dattmouth Street) . ODOT p the year 2000. 8,000 vehicles per day on 68th Parkway by It is obvious that installation of public main line sanitary sewerage facilities prior to ODOT's road installation work. 'thei'ealong should be done p OWNERSHIPS: == there are 68 Within the boundary of the proposed sanitary sewerage district, separate parcels of land; but, in terms of "ownerships" there are 31 The object vice to each physically herein being is provision of public sanitary sewerage ser physically clustered ownership within the district. It isolated ownership and each phy Y .• Vii.. �.- . is absolutely necessary to have that service concept clearly understoo . ':Onerships within and assessed value of the district is shown on Table # w 1_ BENEFITS: 'r - sanitary sewerage d , istrict, each ownership is Within the bounds o£ the proposed sed-public rtunit to a direct connection to the propo •�•.;, --provided with- the--opportunity-oppo Y ..,r:.... sewerage facility and, subsequently, should be considered to have been directly 'moi•:=' of the total cost of said facility. � '- benefitted and assessable for a fair share portion . �. "A" The proposed district boundary is described on the attached Exhibit -) ASSESSMENT METHOD: applied is based on private ownership acreage, ¢ .° <. The assessment method proposed to be then, �..�.. - 7 t Cost per Acre .; to wit .l) Total Project Cost Total Acreage iF cel Assessment. 2) Cost per Acre }C Individual Tax Lot Acreage = Par (ESTIMATED) COST: The estimated total cost of the proposed public sewerage facility is $ i35 800 �)�• Said cost is detailed in Table # 2 ' (ESTIMATED) ASSESSMENT DISTRIBUTION: pe ownership, is illustrated in Table # 3. The distribution of estimated assessments p the Assessment using the aformentioned Estimated Total Cost and Such was computed Method. Pa_ a 1� �• 4� t OWNERSHIP & ASSESSED VALUATION 9- T' e . ` TABLE # 1 TAX L - - T.(_lA'i'VALUATION1 VAN il LOT # MAP # NAME LAND IMP. I.D. NO. 1. 100 1AA D.J.B. , INC. 127,500 - 53 2. 1400 SAA " 39,000 - 53 3. 1301 1AA 26,000 100 59 4. 4800 36DD ro 4,000 - 44 5. 4900 36DD 6,000 - 47 6. 5000 36DD 4,000 - 46 7. 5100 36DD 4,000 - 45 S. 5800 36DD 14,000 - 48 9. 1700 1AA 129,500 - 50 10. 1200 1AA 67,600 - 60 11. 5700 36DD G.L. Ball 20,000 13,000 49 12. 6600 36DD of18,100 17,000 40 1'� 500 36DD G. L. Ball & Bank of Calif. 4,000 - 41 14.. 1900 1AA Donald E. & Julia Gail Pollock 3,800 - 55 15. 1300 36DD. 6,000 - 7 16. 6700 36DD 4,000 - 39 17- 6800 36DD " 4,000 38 18. 3300 36DD Donald E. & Doris B. Hartig 4,000 - 16-18 19. 3301 36DD e, °' 18,101 28,200 17 20. 1400 35DD John E. & Janine M. King 4,000 - 6 21. 2600 36DD Boyd D. & Donna Johnson 18,100 29,700 19 22. 3001 36DD Ramona Eileen Alvarez 20,200 47,700 31 23. 3200 36DD Irving L. & Jennie E. Larson 6,000 - 21 24. 3290 36DD 18,100 27,300 20 25. 3400 36DD 6,000 - 29 2& 3402 36DD 30,200 61,300 22 27. 3500 36DD 20,200 21,800 30 OWNERSHIP & ASSESSED VALUATION I TABLE # 1 rAx VALUATION LOT MAP # NAME LAND IMP. Z.D. NO. :f 28. 3700 36DD Irving & Jennie E. Larson 20,200 21,800 23 IS.,� 9Q:5300 36DD ^ ^ 12,000 - 34=37 0 400 36DD ^ ^ 20,200 24,200 33 ' 590L3 36DD " 4,000 43 i 4,800 - 36 6000 36DD 3201 36DD State of Oregon - 70 ; 34. 3404 36DD 69 ..4. .; « - - S:. 5301 36DD 68 .t .,. 67 901 36DD " - - s#� _ 35 ' '5200 36DD ^ 5500 36DD " •J =400 lAA Ford Leasing Dev. Co. 537,900 524,300 52 tiTL'K: 40:. 3800 36DD Erhart Steinborn 55,000 69,400 13 4+y s: ^ 20 - 14 4 ;'4400 36DD ,700 6,000 - 26 42 4100 36DD Anne Leiser `43: 200 36DD " 20,200 20,100 2 ;44. 301 36DD Margaret A. Mattson. 2,000 - 81 ;45. 400 36DD 2,000 - 9 A6. 500 36DD 19,200 39,000 10 *47. 6100 36DD Robert S. & Harriett Hogg 30,200 51,500 32 48: 3403 36DD Diane L. Baldwin 4,000 - 28 '49. 3600 36DD Judy Lorraine Strogny 4,000 - 27 50. 3900 36DD John K. & Ila J. Wardin & 20,200 21,200 15 G.F. & Marina E. Wardint Erhart 57 1000 36DD Lewis J. & Jennie O. BucholsSteinborn 20,200 34,800 24 52. 4300 36DD Dories Philip & Louise Tazer 22,200 31,800 25 % Frederick Cooper 53. 100 36DD Stephen L. St. Clair 18,100 25,800 1 OWNERSHIP & ASSESSED VALUATION y TABLE # 1 TAX VALUATION `.LOT # MAP # NAME LAND IMP I.D. NO. 54. 600 36DD Tigard Water District - - 12 x:55 700 36DD Barbara Anderson :.y.. 20,200 13,400 3 900 36DD Lawrence Estes & Dolores Dorthy { Greene 20,200 51,800 5 „570 ":800 36DD Family Baptist Church - - 4 58. 801 36DD t 59. 2000 1AA Marvin F. & JoAnn Winters 3,800 - 56 6Q: 2100 1AA 3,800 - 57 a<.`.'- 3,800 - 58 ]:• '� 2200 1AA " 6 .4500 1AA Roy W. & Ardelle C. Anderson 21,300 28,400 66 f 5500 lAA John K. Wardin 80,000 - 65 -- 'V 4800 1AA Bruce H. & Debra H. Bartlett ::•. ..: - 64 John F. & Mary A. Wardin 36,00 .7: 6s. . 5200 1AA 24,000 - 62 _6 :61t i 5300 1AA " 48,000 - 63 .6.7,;.; 1800 1AA Max W. & Marlene A. Landon 21,300 39,500 54 W-68. 401 1AA Ronald Dychen 237,700 - 61 x III WIN L. ' ESTIMATED TOTAL COST (TABLE NO. 2) ITEM UNIT EST. UNITS EST. UNIT PRICE EST. COST Clea.ring & Grubbing L.S. All - $ 2,000 Excavating L.F. 4600 3.00 13,800 .[ ear:•: avel.Base & Pipe Zone L.F. 4600 L.F. 2.50 11,500 4 t Trench, Rock Backfill L.F. 4600 L.F. 9.00 41,400 F _S)' 8" Pipe, in place L.F. 3400 L.F. 7.00 23,800 }' 6) 6" Pipe, in place L.F. 1200 L.F. 6.00 7,200 48" Precast M.H. w/R&C, in place Ea 10 1,000.00 10,000 e Y, I.f.; Ccnnect @ Exist. M.H. Ea 1 500.00 500 -:Pavement R & R L.F. 800 L.F. 7.00 5,600 Contingency - - - 3,150 Est. Payment to Contractors . . . . . . . 118,950 .r . .r==• SUMMARY. (Estimate) Payment to Contractors $ 118,950 y` S J.: Engineering °1 g 7 800 Interest on Warrants 2,500 Legal 1,780 i Financial 595 y.. Clerical 595 Admin, Advertize, Print. , etc. 1,780 i, Contingency 2,700:. e Estimated Total Project Cost: $ 136,800 ) s r ( ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DE5'i•RInUTIviy (TABLE NO. 3) T.L. NO. NAME AC. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 200 (1AA) D.J.B. INC. .683 $ 4,498 1400 (1AA) .339 2,232 1301 UAA) •229 1,508 4800 (36DD) .14 922 4900 (36DD) .24 1,581 5000 (36DD) '° . 15 988 5100 (36DD) .18 1,185 5800 (36DD) .45 2,963 1700 (1AA) .671 4,419 1200 (1AA) --5x .&0 3,932 SUB TOTAL:$ 24,228 5700 (36DD) G.L. Ball '�39�2� 1,976 6600 (36DD) .207 1,363 SUB TOTAL: S 3,339 6500 (36DD) G.L. Ball & Bank of Calif. .051 S 336 1900 (1AA) D.E. & J.G. Pollock - 115 $ 757 1300 (36DD) • 172 1, 133 6700 (36DD) . 103 678 6800 (36DD) . 103 678 SUBTOTAL: 3, 246 -_ _ ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRIBUTION 1` (TABLE NO. 3) 1r, T.L. NO. NAME AC. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 3300 (36DD) D.E. & D.B. Hartig .295 $ 1,943 3301 (36DD) .160 1,054 SUB TOTAL: $ 2,997 `1400 ' (36DD) J. & J. King .115 S 757 x, 2600 (36DD) B.D. & D. Johnson .344 $ 2,265 ;- 3001 (36DD) R.E. Alvarez .295 $ 1,943 3200 (36DD) I.L. & J.E. Larson• .224 $ 1,475 3290" (36DD) .115 757 3400 (36DD) " .229 1,508 --3402 . (36DD) .682 4,49L 3500 (36DD) .209 1,376 370Q (36DD) n .231 1,521 ter•- 5300 (36DD) .436 2,871 `C PV.," 5400 (36DD) .204 1,343 5900 (36DD) .029 191 6000 (36DD) .172 1,133 <I SUB TOTAL: $ 16.666 3201 (36DD) State of Oregon .006 $ •J 3404 (36DD) .006 40 5301 (36DD) .023 151 5901 (36DD) .200 1,317 �P 5200 (36DD) •, .229 1,508 5500 (36DD) .172 1,133 SUB TOTAL:$ .4,189 Page s ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRIBUTION (TABLE NO. 3) it T.L. NO. NAME AC. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT t+ 400 (1AA) Ford Leasing 2.95 $ 19,428 '3800 (36DD) E. Steinborn .287 $ 1';890 .229 1,508 (36DD) SUB TOTAL: $ 3,398 ''-4100 (36DD) A. Leiser .365 $ 2,404 200 (36DD) .325 2,140"- SUB ,140SUB TOTAL: $ 4,544 .057 S 375 '` .. 301 (360D) M. A. Mattson 41.'400 (36DD) .057 375 500 (36DD) .229 1,508 .F SUB TOTAL: S 2,258 6100 (36DD) R.S. & H. Hogg .203 1,337 3403 (36DD) D.L. Baldwin .115 757 3600 (36DD) J.L. Strojny .115 757 xa.. 3900 (36DD) J.K. & Z.J. Wardin & Er[lart M,ESteinb. Wardin .172 1,133 ' . 4000 (36DD) L.J. & J.O. Buchols .287 1,890 4300 (36DD) D. , P. & L. Tazer .344 2,265 ti• _ $ Frederick Cooper 100 (36DD) S.I. St. Clair .365 2,404 2;265 600 (36DD) Tigard Water District .344 ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRIBUTION (TABLE NO. 3) T.L. NO. NAME AC. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT : 700 (36DD) J.A. & M.M. Martin by .296 $ 1,949 :.y V.B. Stevens .335 900 2x206 900 (36DD) L. Estes & D.D. Greene $ - �.., 800. (36DD) Family Baptist Church .743 4,893 ' 801 (36DD) .265 1,745 SUB' TOTAL: S 6,638 200 (1AA) M.F. & J. Winters .172 S 1,133 1' .115 757 :2100 (1AA) rr " .229 1,508 J%:7 :'.:.`4200 (lAA) ~r5 SUB TOTAL: .$ 3,398 -,,;:;4500 (1AA) R_W. & A.C, Anderson .172 1,133 i;- 5500 (lAA) J.K. Wardin .459 3,023 4800 UAA) B.H. & D.A. Bartlett & ,S' is.•. - J.F. & N.A. Wardin .115 $ 757 5200 UAA) " .225 1,508 f 5300 (lAA) " _459 3,023 SUB TOTAL: $ 5,288 _ .384 401 2,530 i 1800 (1AA) M.N. & M.A. Landon 401 UAA) R. Dyches 8,233 Century 21 Homes Inc. 1.25 TOTALS: 20.773 Ac. $ 136,800 ft � Ln St E3E3 a O� S- LCWI SAW Ft- CT. a � � �i`e` / 4 �i OWW 2b To It ST. xv S.11 LW &IL SOLL"aw CT. owl CREEK CE a Sx + S..E #Utz st S. Ir cc ro .r a of MIX TO Or &41n_ I cl f (�COOK.� a JE i�s — l fMf• 1 � /� 1 a � ''ti LL- 00 'K.Ct. � �• .• ,�,• d� _ �J� ( ...tai s y �;t tam t T�•••� Y--J 6�-.1•�la sr,,A, f �.�!i�l4l -• Y 7f •'•. t � .fit 7- !- rj Y �� � �,•� :i_.'lam Vii..� t S� a;5,,,�`r� �: of �� •• -� _ ` s V s. � f.�N 1- � _ a yy t• ♦ Yi./��- .e\.Y 11 .S. .c „'`` .y �•- '� �{•.� �r ♦ J j t _ - t I. .` '=-j�.���}��- a. '.:'�. _.i: s-' �s�s�. &r � - _ :%_ �• �.w� i�Y.h Vis; � � sJ36s _ _ - •� a..�a: 1 M C yX .{`•' r•• /- t��C' ,i � 1 _ s `�' `l!la rs '.� .i. -r +sI�A'r' ® - -T— O L! .t ' {•4 jJ l-ir J/�' :^ �•••� • moi• �• _ r L r-t !-•'!1 y �'� I � 16 min ► E M Iz Suit�6A t..-_1_�� •�� 1 I �fl' f or- ® -io - M I d � F �^ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON j COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: July 18, 1983 AGENDA ITEM k: Consent —57— DATE SUBMITTED: July 14, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Progress Payment for Construction on 72nd Ave. LID #21 REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: 1— CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Facilitates payment to contractor for work done to date, per contract agreement. i l ` to f f t t { i { F t { e ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED _ E c { s s t yFy G SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends Council authorize payment to contractor per contract agreement. 2.fo IF . p July 18, 1983 FROM: Neighborhood Planning Organization Three (NPO #3) TO; Tigard City Council ent have with Plannin We wish to bring to your attention a diiton County,- eem the3.republic he process Director Bill Monahan. Washington n plan, provided Tig for their transportatioard with a draft which included atta the Murray Blvd. Extension and seaiBi1ltem. ANionahanewrotechd to tailetter dmemorandumat d•May l2s Representing the City of T g 1983 (attached as item B), which wassentered into the public record. Our opportunity of his letter to fi concern is that Mr. Monahan did not use the pportu it a Murray Blvd. s express the City's strong stand taken in opposition Extension to Gaarde Street in Tigard's Comprehensiee Plan--attached as item t C. s that he and other Citi staff Planning Director Bill Monahan explained to u had. chosen the tactic of drawing from the County°s own soingeofsview,eitoIs ! for changing the county transportation plan. From our p presentation of unfortunate that Mr. Monaha n's tactic resulted is omitting the adopted position of the City of Tigard. _ t Incidents like this give us a growing perception that City staff Councils the City are sometimes inconsistent with the positions taken by ; in its resolutions and ordinances. We recomployeesashall accuratelyt the City ( establish and enforce the policy that its employees { the position of the City, as adopted in its ordinances, in thanr commuuicati�o� f 1 to other government agencies. Thank you for your consideration, Neighborhood Planning Ori nization Three Bob Bledsoe, Chairman ! i cc. Planning Director Bill Monahan i 119 transportation action the creation of an arterial system on the above described general alignment. Location and design efforts will respect rural/natural resources and the unique environments along the alignment to the greatest extent possible. #6. Extension of Murray Boulevard: Existing as well as proposed development within the cities of Beaverton and Tigard will increase the need for improved access between these municipalities. Lacking this interconnection local, short distance trips will plague and congest travel on Highway 217 and Scholls Ferry Road. County analyses indicate that a two to three lane minor arterial extension of Murray Blvd. south of Old Scholls Ferry Road, preferably to Gaarde Road which connects to 99W (Pacific Highway) , will accommodate Year 2000 travel projections. Policy Direction - Washington County will cooperate with ` Metro and ODOT's efforts to analyze more precisely the travel needs of this corridor/connection. Further, the County will participate in the delineation of appropriate alternatives which assure provision of urban services which not only accommodate residents of the above cities but also the travel needs of unincorporated area residents who are attracted to travel opportunities within these jurisdictions. #7. Southeast Area East/West Arterial Connections: Washington County's analysis of future travel needs indicate a current and continuing deficiency in east/west facilities in the above portion of the County. The major corridor of 99W provides major access on a north/south orientation to and from points outside the County. Yet there is very limited ability for regional as well as local truck traffic and other major movements to travel in an east/west direction between this facility (99W) and industrial develop- ment in the Tigard and Tualatin areas. Additional develop- i� Pa ,for". JI \�G �� r- � }sem _"'.'•r.�;1. �Il rn ��1 _.�►.�. - -- _ _✓ _ ' .a<y.�..a+.\wcTi�, i ; `-, 37 _ r— • ,� 5800 _ .L/i �.ca'„ _ter—[f--3i' -, .' O+y ,'� =t F `�^•N - �r 4,20 :r rte,._... ?�y-J/{` '1r�, /-,t 1�',-�I i�P� 1�' ia'l iti�l' '�•��!L$O II � � _ � v_ 9I i �eii.arEa ' fir• ` .+. 0 �.� '�. ` ,•-t_ i�I__ �!IU�i:bx L, li �'�'ai �� � � r—=P14 %� �.r _� •t -1 'moi (1�, ♦_' '�-1`t�::C'c:...-,. I ��-,•�' it it �.a I � II �� tet ®�� d��%y r ... s '/``n`r� .���i 1• � ��i �a .._ 300'i ,i ii!a\ i�.r ' i:e'- ��\ <1GT � � _�"-'-_ � �C �r•: : .��; �;..J� ! ..L_,'I 'r t 4 i cf D , �_-'-•U3 p' III `y dam: �_� �_�1� i err-'sci�1"` its` ^r• I - .. 0-- . �_ r•_--;, � t` Plan Testimony Recd cc: BCC PC RD ,�, •- �. YA_ c� fig. JR ' o`i• 't �i �� MN _ "�- (LCOC) V.ASHIN�:�TON COUNTY,OREGON 1983 RESP: PROJ. May 12. ---, Mr. Richard Daniels, Planning Director Washington County Administrative Building 150 h. First Avenue tTillsboro, Oregon 97123 .Re: Washin.Oton County's Draft Transportation Plan Dear Rick, tunity The City of Tigard Planning Division has had an ouorrstaff. toureco-vents the draft Transportation Plan supplied to vs by v are directly only to the areas pertinent to the City's particular interests. Our concerns are as follows: 1) Policy 115 Language on page 119 concerning the extension of Murray Boulevard. The City proposed the following language: 06. Extension of Murray Boulevard Existing as well as proposed development within the cities of Beaverton and Tigard will increase the need for improved access between these municipalities_ Lacking ethis nd interconnection local, short distance trips will p $ congest travel on Highway 217 and Scholls Ferry Road_ County analyses indicate that a two to three lane minor collector extension of Murray Boulevard, south of Old Scholls Ferry Road, preferably in a series of connections to Walnut Street, Gaarde Street, and Bull Fountain Road will accorodate year 2000 travel projections. Policy Direction - Washington County will cooperate with .—and the local jurisdictions efforts to analyze Metro, O.D.O. ofthis more precisely the travel reeds corridor/connection. t n fap- Further, the County will participate in rovision of urban services propriate alternatives which assure p which do not only accommodate residents of the above cities but also the travel needs of unincorporated area residents who are attracted to travel opportunities within these jurisdictions. 12755 S W. ASF! P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD. OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 May 12, 1983 Page 2 Rick Daniels Washington County 2) Figure 15, Functional Classification System – Tigard – Bull Mountain Area – Page 31. The City takes issue with the delineation of the proposed regional connector from i;urray Road to 99W.- The proposed location of an arterial facility from Murray Road to 99W at Gaarde will neither function as a by pass due to its location or the proposed size. The proposed size lends itself to a minor collector status only. Also, the topographic con– straints present do not promote an economically feasible design of a road. Durham Road is shown as a major arterial. This designation is j contrary to Metro's Regional Transportation Plan that indicates that the needs and locations for this type of facility are to be determined. Also, the City questions the Gaarde road connection to McDonald j shown as part of Murray Road. it is shown as a straight connection as if this connection currently exists. A proper designation t would sh-w. the actual course of Gaarde as it connects to 99W south of McDonald or indicate that the connection is a proposed facility. 3) Candidate Transit Streets – Page 79 – Other than the arterial system, the •standards for local and collector streets in Tigard to be used for transit should be determined by the local jurisdictions and Tri–Met. 4) LRT Transitory and Regional Trunk Routes – Page 82 As an alternative to the proposed LRT through Tigard along Highway i 217 and Hall, the City proposes that Oleson Road be used to the Burlington Northern Trunk down through the City of Tigard to Bonita Road to :ruse Way. The City appreciates the o ortun-it to review this draft plan. We would be happy to provide additional comments should you require them. Sincerely, i E William A. Monahan Director of Planning & Development WAM:p j r . cc: .lYvonne Addington, Urban Planning 1:anager✓ g t 2 � xet the regional and local needs stated in the RTP, the City of Tigard has ccated which collector connections should be constructed . ese connections are indicated according to the various Neighborhood Planning rganization (NPO) areas. The specific intent of these collector connections are listed below and are shown on the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. NPO #1: i The minor collector connection needed in this area is the Ash Street connection from the dead-end pcint south of Fanno Creek to Burnham Street. The actual phasing of this connection is hinged on the development of Hill and Lake Streets to O'Mara. Hill and Lake Streets are designated as local } streets, while O'Mara is designated as a minor collector. The specific policy is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan Policy Document under "Special Areas of Concern. " 1 NPO #2: The only minor coll; ctor connection needed in the NPO #2 area is the continuation of Commercial Street to 98th Street linking the Greenburg area to the Main Street area. NPO #3: 3 This area interfaces the County's CPO #4 -- Bull Mountain Area which is also within the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary. By the year 2000, the overall development of the Bull Mountain area will include approximately 1540 ' additional dwelling units. These are in addition to the approximately 970 units expected to develop in the NPO #3 area. Based on the land use designations on the CPO #4 Bull Mountain plan map and the land use designations on the NPO #3 plan map, there is a need to establish a series of collector connections to move the estimated 18,000 trips per day from these units to the existing collectors and arterial street connections.* .r The major resident concern within these areas was that this additional traffic would be accommodated by constructing a "direct" link from Murray Boulevard north of Scholls Ferry Road south to Gaarde Street. The need for a "direct" connection seems to be unwarranted because this direct connection could place a potential rapid increase of traffic onto 99W which is already congested to an unacceptable level as it passes through the Tigard area. Rather than a "direct" connection, the City of Tigard has suggested a series of collector connections between Murray Boulevard and Gaarde Street. These collector connections will link Walnut to Bull Mountain Raod and Gaarde to the Walnut/Bull Mountain Connections (See Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map). To continue the "indirect" route to Murray Boulevard, an additional connection from 135th to Murray Boulevard is also shown. The specific projected daily peak hour travel trips are also shown on the Comprehensive Plan Transporation Map. !. *Source: Washington County Computer. Estimates based on the MSD Regional Transportation Plan population and employment projections. -22- C' . SAFE AS POSSIBLE. CONFORMANCE WITH ASH AVENUE SHALL BE DESIGNATED A MINOR COLLECTOR IN MITIGATION riEASURES THE MASTER STREET PLAN, A MINOR COLLECTOR. HALL HOLD TRAFFIC VOLUMES , DESIGN FEATURES AND O THE MIDDLE LIMITS OF 11.2.2 IMPROVEMENTS TO S.W- ASH AVENUE FROM S.W, r CONSTRUCTED AS CONDITION HILL TO FANNO CREEK SHALL BE STREET OF ALONG O WITH `THE PMENTDEVELOPMENT' OF A SITE WILL INCREASE T OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES. THE HILL STREET TRAFFIC ON ASH- A BARRICADE SHALL MAJOR COMMERCIAL THE NEIGHBORHOODR RES DENTS FROM THE CO IMATELY AT THE END OF EXISTING P EMENT T LACED AT MMERCIAL TRAFFIC, pPOTECT 11.2.3 METHODS OF MITIGATING THE TRAFFIC INCLUDE IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER OFIMPACT ON CONSTRUCTION: THE NEIGHBORHOOD SHALL a- IMPROVING S.W, MCDONALD STREET TO INTERIM ENCOURAGE TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH OF MAINTENANCE STANDARDS TU ! TO HALL ANA/OR PACIFIC MCDONALD TO USE MCDONALD HIGHWAY, TO EXIT Eb '• IMPROVEMENTS TO THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF FREWING. THESE IMPROVEMENTS COULD ASH FROM DELINEATION OF TRAFFICINCLUDE HILL TO THE STREET- AND SIDEWALKS ON ONE LORIBOTH SIDES OF LANES C. THE EXTENSION OF S.W. HILL TO S.W. OF S.W. ASH FROM FREWING TO GARRETT. 01MARA AND/OR THE IMPROVEMENT t d- THE EXTENSION OF S.W. O'MARA TO S-W, HILL PARALLEL TO S.W. ASH. e- REMOVAL OF THE B ARRICADE IN PLACE ON AS d H AVENUE AT S.W. `-; . f- IMPROVEMENT OF S.W. HILL. O'MARA STREET TO INTERIM 'S TO ENCOURAGE AN ALTERNATE ROUTE. MAINTENANCE STANDARDS 'ifs g• INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC I ASH IF AND WHEN INHIBITORS TO THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF MINOR COLLECTOR. TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXCEED I. , TRAFFIC INHIBITORS INCLUDE BUT MIDDLE RANGE FOR A TO PLANTING ISLANDS, SPEED BUMPS, EUTTONS, LOAD LIMITS AND ENFORCEMENT. ARE NOT LIMITED ! ' TURNING RESTRICTIONS, i,} r �T4 11.3 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION l p.S Many of the older residential i county neighborhoods in Y roads that NPO #3 were traveled, were lightly traveled developed along Some of this increased but which traffic are now g �''' some of it is throw results from more heavily route has been built.through traffic which must use these local development, Further increased roads , and °f these in traffic since no arterial roads, may adversely impact the and consequent widening roads- This is particular) quality Which have right-Of-ways Y the case with Y of the residences along these ght-of-ways of 121st Avenue ! 40 to 50 feet that are and Gaarde Street, Offset in some places. tr C 2, ��— -71- The comprehensive plan for NPO #3, adopted by the City of Tigard in 1975, supported and implemented the conclusions of Carl Buttke, the consulting ! {A engineer who performed the traffic studies for the various NPOs. These I j conclusions were that 121st Avenue and Gaarde Street should be developed as i two lane roads limited to a total of 30 feet "to avoid motorists from forming a third land, but providing sufficient roadway width for turning vehicles." The 1975 plan included provisions for these roads to have pedestrian-bicycle paths, and to have restrictions on parking. Also, low densities were planned for the neighborhoods serviced by these streets ; one reason was to avoid further overloading of these streets with additional traffic resulting from higher densities. The City of Tigard, in the 1975 plan for NPO #3, opposed a proposed Murray �( Boulevard Extension through NPO #3. It has been the opinion of both the City and the local residents that the Murray Boulevard Extension to Pacific Highway should be located to the west of Bull Mountain. Completion of this arterial N linkage could remove much of the through traffic from what should be r neighborhood collector streets. �L F FINDINGS o The development along most of the collector streets in NPO #3 is !k predominantly low density residences which are in good condition. o The present right-of-way along much of S.W. 121st Avenue and S.W. Gaarde �• street is 40 to 45 feet wide, with offsets in some places. Widening these streets to major collector standards would impact some of the existing homes on these streets. { I � o Some of the traffic now using S.W. 121st Avenue and Gaarde Street is not local, but rather through traffic, which could be better provided for by a located arterial connection between Murray Boulevard and Pacific properly �i Highway. o Future development on the land along 121st and Gaarde will add to the traffic volumes on those streets. o S.W. Gaarde Street and S.W. 121st Avenue south of Walnut both have many jl�a uncontrolled access points; this condition will require special design jh attention when street improvements are made. o A direct connection between Murray Boulevard, or Scholls Ferry Road, and Gaarde Street and/or 121st Avenue has been proposed many times in the past. A direct arterial connection proposal was considered in detail in the 1975 NPO #3 Plan and was emphatically rejected by the City of Tigard. It has also been rejected by the current NPO #3. �i POLICY I i 11.3. 1 THE CITY SHALL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING WHEN PREPARING STREET i IMPROVEMENT PLANS THAT AFFECT S.W. 121ST AVENUE OR GAARDE STREET_ ! .i, ill'1 -72- ;f a. THE IMPACT ON THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AND THE ALTERNATIVES WHICH HAVE THE MINIMUM ADVERSE EFFECT IN TERMS OF: 1. REDUCING THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE DWELLING AND THE STREET; AND 2. NOISE IMPACTS. F b. THE EFFECT THE IMPROVEMENT WILL HAVE ON THE TRAFFIC FLOW AND THE POSSIBLE NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON OTHER STREET INTERSECTIONS. C. MINIMIZING THE USE OF THESE STREET AS PART OF THE ARTERIAL SYSTEM FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC. 11.3.2 THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL WORK WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARTERIAL ROUTE CONNECTION FROM MURRAY BOULEVARD OR SCROLLS FERRY ROAD TO PACIFIC HIGHWAY. THIS ARTERIAL ROUTE SHOULD BE AND SHOULD NOT LOCATED WEST OF BULL RESIDENTIAL MOUNTAIN, AREAS WITHIN TIGARD. ROADS WHICH PASS THROUGH EXISTING RE Z IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. S.W. Gaarde Street and S.W. 121st Avenue (between Gaarde and Walnut) shall be developed as two-lane roads with pedestrian-bicycle paths, restricted parking and left turning lanes as needed at congested intersections. 2. The undeveloped land along S.W. 121st Avenue (south of Walnut) shall be in accordance with the locational criteria planned for development policies that apply to locating medium and higher densities close to arterials and in accordance with the policies for "Established" and "Developing" areas. 3. The Tigard Community Development Code shall require site design review for any development other than a single or two family structure. The site design review shall include review of street right-of-way and pavement location. 11.4 NEIGHBORHOOD .PLANNING ORGANIZATION #4 POLICY 5 11.4.1 IN THE TIGARD TRIANGLE (I.E. THAT AREA BOUNDED BY PACIFIC HIGHWAY, HIGHWAY 217, AND THE INTERSTATE 5-FREEWAY), IN THOSE PARCELS DESIGNATED "CP", HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (I.E. 20 TO 40 UNITS PER ACRE) SHALL BE A USE ALLOWED OUTRIGHT IN CONJUCTION WITH COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL USES. 11.4.2 IN THE TIGARD TRIANGLE DESCRIBED IN POLICY 11.4.1, THOSE PARCELS DESIGNATED FOR ANY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT DEVELOP FOR SUCH USE, IF NOT ALREADY SO DEVELOPED, UNLESS A MAJOR COLLECTOR, CONNECTING THE AREA ON PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT APPROXIMATELY 78TH AVENUE AND THE i C -73- i i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t, { COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: July 1$, 1983 AGENDA ITEM 6: DATE SUBMITTED: July 14, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: Council referred ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Sensitive this item from 6/27/83 Lands Discussion with Planning REQUESTED BY: City Council and Commission. Planning Commission DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is a matrix: of the proposed Sensitive Lands Policy for review by the Council and Planning Commission at a joint study session. zazszaasa$mmzzza:s:zsaaz:szzzzcsazsz:=aaaas=az=xaa===c=z.==s s=ac====xsa a css=zr-=== ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Council can revise the section and advise staff to make necessary revisions to the draft community development code or Council may recommend that the draft as proposed be reviewed at public hearings at the Planning Commission and City Council. szezaaazass ccs:sass umazaa:s=aasca==canes=sacarx=s=es.======e===s=====x s-a.ss=e===== SUGGESTED ACTION l Staff recommends that Council review the documentation with the Planning Commission and give staff policy direction. q \ k � Q « g 4460 g v tri G 2 � § / J 22 � r4 Cu B B r4 60 02 H S k� § :ft Cd@ k 12, 60 0.o ca pill kk k / Ln 4* V 0 ca § % 0 2 d e § k § w a0o § bo 2 wl v k § � � k k k 02 C 0 7 �r . kNI C 3 . a 040 ,4 E / / 40 93 k o o 04 ° 9 7 = w 44 > > . Q o k k © .,Go § ■ too « 2 » » _ ¥ ten 0 2 co� C3 v4 S2 3 � e . § § § � k 2 0 0 w r4 0 c / 0 k \ % 04 V� k k k 14 ' .Ti Cirf OF MAW WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON TO: Members of the City Council, Planning Commission FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development DATE: July 14, 1983 RE: Sensitive Lands Joint Hearing. The attached matrix is a draft proposal incorporating section 18.84.010 - 18.84.100 of the draft community development code with a revised fee schedule. We have attempted to show the threshold of land form alternation which would be allowed before a higher fee and greater approval authority is triggered for drainageways. Unstable ground, steep slopes, and floodplain alternation all require Hearings Officer approval. Each also requires review by the City Engineer for completion. Please review this matter with the draft sections of the code. Also, please review the approval standards, 18.84.040, so that the Council and Commission can discuss them. You may note that in each case except floodplain the first two standards are similar. Staff proposes that the Floodplain Standards be entirely different. The work session for this item was delayed from the June 27 Council session. The session should begin around 8:00 P.M. on Monday, July 18, 1983, i i at Fowler Junior High School i i i i i I z i I i 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 i 18.84 SENSITIVE 1 kNDS f 18.84.010 Purpose A. Sensitive Lands are lands potentially unsuitable For development j because of location within 100-year floodplain, within natural drainageway, on steep slopes or on unstable ground. B. Sensitive land areas are designated as such to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the community through the regulation of these sensitive land areas. i C. The regulations of this Chapter are intended to implement the # Comprehensive Plan and the Federal Emergency Management Agency's flood insurance program, and help to preserve natural sensitive land areas from encroaching uses and to maintain the September 1981 zero-foot rise floodway elevation. D. City actions under this Chapter will recognize the rights of reparian owners to be free to act on the part of the City, its commissions, representatives and agents, and land owners and occupiers. K 1$ 84 015 Applicability of Uses - Permitted, Prohibited and Nonconforming A. Except as provided by subsection (B), the following uses shall be outright permitted with sensitive land areas: l I. Accessory uses such as lawns, gardens or play areas; 2. Agricultural uses conducted without locating a structure within the sensitive land area; r 3. Community recreation uses such as bicycle and pedestrian paths or athletic fields or parks, excluding structures; 4. Public and private conservation areas for water, soil, open w space, forest and wildlife resources; 5. Removal of poison oak, tansy ragwort, blackberry or other noxious vegetation; 6. Maintenance of floodway, excluding rechanneling; and 7. Fences, excluding floodplain area. B. The following uses and activities are permitted only by a Sensitive Lands permit granted by the Hearings Officer except (3)(a) and (b): i 1. Land form alteration or development within the 100-year j floodplain; 2. Land form alteration or development on slopes of 25% or greater and unstable ground; IV-28 3. Land form alteration or development within a drainageway where there is year round water flow, unless: a. The drainageway is proposed to be incorporated into a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum water flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan; or b. The land is not proposed to be partitioned, subdivided or developed. 4. The provisions in subsection 3 (a) and 3 (b) may be approved by the Director. C. Except as explicitly authorized by other provisions of this chapter, all other uses are prohibited on sensitive land areas. D. A use established prior to the adoption of this Code, which would be prohibited by this chapter or which would be subject to the limitations and controls imposed by this chapter shall be considered nonconforming, and be subject to the provisions of chapter 18.132 of this Code. 18 84 020 Administration and Approval Process A. The applicant for a Sensitive Lands permit shall be the recorded owner of the property or an agent authorized in writing by the owner. B. A Pre-Application conference with City staff is required. See Section 18.32.030. C. Due to possible changes in State statutes, or regional or local policy, information given by staff to the applicant during the Pre-Application Conference is valid for not more than 6 months. 1. Another Pre-Application Conference is required if any variance application is submitted 6 months after the Pre-Application Conference. 2. Failure of the Director to provide any of the information required by this chapter shall not constitute a waiver of the standard, criteria or requirements of the applications. D. The Bearings 'Officer shall approve, approve with conditions or deny Jan application for a Sensitive Lands permit as set forth in Section 18.84.015 (B)(1)(2)(3), excluding subsections (3)(a) and (3)(b). E. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an appl cation_`for a Sensitive Lands permit as set forth in Sections 18.84.015 (B)(3)(a) and (b). IV-29 r F. The Hearings Officer and the Director shall apply the s:.andasuo set forth is Section 18.84.040 of this Chapter when reviewing an application for a Sensitive Lands permit. Hearings G. The decision of the Officer or-Director may be appealed ; i in accordance with Section 18.32.260(B). f re uest : a.•review before - the Council if 1' The applicant 'mgy g. . t r the action..of the hearings;dfficer.,.is to deny:or,to appy r _ with conditions. Col . �r before _the Commxse o w� c -.Z"'' - ti•x+9�. The appllcint9`�y .;request a .hearingf a. + roveJ`fallt s of the tos his to deny ®s PP aCt10� _C ' � -cond3tiotsa,�;�t - * ' k rou of oersons whose interests` `� a , 3. AnY person _or g P;. . cal the xdecs sion-:,,, adversely: offecce&:.by !this action. may'�cPPrings. Of , � 7 �. •:_` to the. Council if the action roveh WithB Condit ons3.Cethe lfr decision . is to approve or app = f '. �J r ' t .• s¢a � applacatzlon. persons or . groups v€ pe.00ns whose interests.:, are. 4. may. P this actioa''baa appeal_ the' :decision t adversely.`of€ected :by y to the Commiesioa .if the.:.ac tion .o€- the Director's!decision r islto approve or approve'vitfi conditions. < i 1 F u .F. its w The Director rs�hal�rinaalx�aotze of,;.anya„sens�ta`ave 1 h�8r 'i1 .f - . r I+i r ,,;..J,erS®IIB Who'cm$ _ e XB. Qt1 tQ 't2efal' Owing t s�fn - efor e�� mm sz s"soon -o acro- dau �• • ..,� . e r pe= �e :� .�• �` .= ub3efl a PPI��ation�, t >' � 15e� 1 Or�locsd�yi ,w 9 €hasper'son' ©f��, ano£fcxai r gn r� , �• if -the;'prs�pert�;°�rhac4i..is the �sub]ect Qrganzs:atiors, . within the f Plannang'- "` of the 'application:: lies wholly or partiisl�y boundaries. of such.o.rganiiation or is adjaceat. thereto. royal Standards of. Extension:of ^LStme + r 1g;84v030 gx Lration of F , Approval of a Sea+iAs tbve Lands permit shall. be void' sfter, one° A. year unless: x. rove$ plebe,_ haa, �egs JeeR 1 Substantial construction ' o€: t2be . app within one year-period; or r - -_ from- 2e Construction on the site is a departure the plan. B. The Fear officer shall, upon written requeat by: the applicant and payment of the required fee, grrnt an extension of the approval period not to exceed: six months provided that: g- IV-30' 1. No changes are made on the original variance plan as _ approved by the Director; r. 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction of the site within the six-month extension period; and 3. There have been no changes in the applicable policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. . - � 18:84.040 Approval: Standards -The _'Hearings. .Officer shall make. findings. ,.on- the.: . following: , criteria.Vhen' approving, approving..With conditions .or-denying'-,law: y - application .reques[thin the 100-year floodplain: s - _.,.. 1. ' Land form alterations which preserve or enhance'..- the function, and maintenance of the zero-foot rise ,.:floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary. 2.' The -land- form alteration or development--within the''1 10-year floodplain .. is designated on the Comprehensive flan Hap: Land- Use as either Commercial or Industrial; 3 The land form alteration or development is reasonable and necessary to achieve better economic use of the -site; 4. The land_ form alteration or development is not located within the floodway, :v �+n-� t � � 4 ff .� � •� �. �• ,�.�t �.t: stfi„i I r-. ,..;` ?'.:. .r.+�*mS = v .� .r � +:{ ',c .t �.� = iC r",`✓�_ a"" -fleOda,w,'aaa ,,ltersat>ivonp 4devtel"opm �wttiM Mtisne a� ofoo;aay� son {of he . zer A O y r;� S - •+• cel �4 ✓Tq °'�'wl.� .P�''ft m" r 1 v. 3S.�k��`,t" " { �?. sL }'�w b y -4 ' c..; 7 -z f -', f ~ I M !ly rhe , emaxning_yi.ndeveloped; land withia; the greenway as=:of.. Septexnber`:P�, 1982 :•is .intended oto:.be dedicated•:.to the•1 Cxty for 'f lood=control arid` gre`enway'purposes;> ]. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan; 8. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. 9. The ,applicant will deposit in - tae Ci ty'a applicable • account, adequate cash to cover the construction of the pedestrian/bicycle pathway if . such pathway will not be ® constructed directly after the time when the land!-..form alteration or development is completed as determined at site design review. B. The Hearings Officer shall make findings on the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or ,denying an application request for a Sensitive Lands permit on slopes' of 25% or greater or unstable ground: IV-31 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the uses; 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground stability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects .or' hazards to life or property. <• ` -k,q. . 3o Appropriate siting and* .design safeguards iahaill� ensure'- structural nsurestructural stability,.and`proper-.-drainage 'o.f:_foundation .And crawl,,space.,areas;:_for. development„with;=any ;ofs`the zfollowing r .3 F �< aoiiz con Xtione ; Wet_ igh' water': table, Isigh shirin&=ewe17:'x .: .•, ^. capability, : compressible/orgaaic, and��' ” stiallo�i; depth=to-bedroek;:and u, , 4. Where:':nitural vegetation has -been'.semoeed due Cor"land' form alteration or development,' the areas not covered by structures, or .impervious surfaces shall be replanted. to - prevent: 'erosion "` in accordance uiith' Section 18.105 (LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING). C. The Hearings O.fficer... shall make findings. on the following criteria when approving, approving .with conditions or denying an application • .request, for a Sensitive Lands permit- within drainagewayar .1. The;'extent ands nature, ofi_the._proposed .land-form--alteration...-: =_ - < ® evelo ' e .•fw' Y#aoor'=tree r?�'' `iter=-da s. to'ban 'est .�: h, Y zee r a e th eq roposed and ,y � r - ys 1. _: -•-�3':K� cd�. ^iS'Cs.c orm a teratxon.�os de�ela ent1wlilXthot- ti,:� az xxA' "i �•tT_ -Y ►, x'.resd3 an erosion" ^=at eaux'dwediiientataon"�z round' 'stabxl�t 7cry 7+S-g .a•�r? yi. 1�; E. or;:o[her `adverse ion=sate auzd.:of=site effeCt��or�hazdrils 'to: � rr. llfe •Qr pgQpeSty,rt" t � ` ` '� `F � '.� s:� ��i 3. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; and 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration- or the development, the areas not .covered by structures or" impervious surfaces shall be replanted to prevent erosion _. in accordance with Section 18.105 (LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING). D. The Direct'r:°shrsllmake fitidi�igs on-- the follow-b-ig criteria 'whesi approving, approving with conditions or denying an application- request for a Sensitive Lands permit within drainageways. to -The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the uses; Iii-32 i i _ 2. The proposed land form alteration will not mea -5t in _ erosion, stream sedimentation, ground stability or other 1 adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or i \. property; 3.% The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in ,accordance a with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Pln; and 4.1 The land involved on which the land form alteration is to Ae\ take place will not be ---partitioned , subdivided or developed as a part of this application request. 18 84.050 Application Submission Requirements A. All applications shall be made on forms provided by the Director and shall be accompanied by: 1. five copies of the Sensitive lands permit proposal and necessary data or narrative which explains how the proposal conforms to the standards, and a. The site plan(s) and required drawings shall be on sheets not exceeding 18" x 24"; and b. The scale for the site plan(s) shall be 20, 50 or 100 feet to the inch. co.: srgs ; 'elevations or floor All drawaorstructure plans ` r +�� r. �'<�.',■++: ra =shells=.besastandard architectural' scale;=bezYig 4h"t�r` •�Y. •�.,�, � �s, _ ,_. �1 j8.._to the-.;foot. r :�c? 2. Names. and :'addresses of• all. persons who are 'ptopertq- owners F" "_. '''-: of record within 250 'feet of the site. .3. The required fee. B. The required information may be combined on one map. C. The site plan(s), data and narrative shall include the following: 1. An existing site conditions analysis, Section 18.84.070; 2. A site plan, Section 18.84.080; 3. A grading plan, Section 18.84.090; 4. A landscape plan, Section 18.84.100; 5. Architectural elevations of all structures, Section 18.84.110; 6. A sign plan, Section 18.84.120; 7. A copy of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants, or prior approval by the City or County. IV-33 i �- 18.84 060 Additional Information Required and Waiver of Requirements A. The Director may require information in addition to that required by this chapter in accordance with Section 18.32.055 (A). B. The Director may waive a specific requirement for information in accordance with Section 17.32.055 (B) and (C). 18.84.070 Site conditions A. The site analysis drawings shall include: 1. A vicinity map showing streets and access points, _ pedestrian and bicycle pathways, and utility locations; 2. The site size and its dimensions; 3. Contour lines at 2-foot intervals for grades 0-10% and 5-foot intervals for grades over 10 percent; i 4. The location of drainage patterns and drainage courses; 5. The location of natural hazard areas including: a. Floodplains areas (100-year floodplain and floodway); b. Slopes in excess of 252; i►- := C -Unstable.- ground�,,i (areas subject to slumping; earth slides or movement); ' F d. Areas having a' high seasonal water table within 24 inches of the surface for three or more weeks of the year; e. Areas having a severe soil erosion potential; or as defined by the Soil Conservation Service; f. Areas having severe weak foundation soils. s t 6. The location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Plan inventory map including: € a. Wildlife habitat; and s b. Wetlands. 7. The location of site features including: i a. Rock outcroppings; and b. Trees with 6" caliper or greater measured 4 feet from ground level. IV-34 . 8. The location of existing structures on the site and i ( proposed use of those structures. 18.84.080 The Site Plan A. The proposed site development plan shall be at the same scale as the site analysis plan and shall include the following information: 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties; 2. Contour line intervals (see Section 18.84.070 (A)(3); 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: a. Existing and platted streets and other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties; and b. Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site. 4. The location and dimension of: a. The entrances and exits on the site; b. The parking and traffic circulation areas; C. Loading and services areas; d. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities; e. Outdoor common areas; and f. Above ground utilities. 5. The location, dimensions and setback distances of all: a. Existing structures, improvements and utilities which are located on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site and are permanent in nature. b. Proposed structures, improvements and utilities on the site. 6. The location of areas to be landscaped; and 7. The locations of proposed utility lines. 1 O O/ f9[1A p crzdinw Plan wyvv-'►• • A. The site plan shall include a grading plan which contains the following information: -q 1. Requirements in Sections 18.84.070 and 18.84.080 of this chapter. e Iv-35 i ' 2. The location and extent to whichBending will talo ^r-�ce-- indicating contour lines, slope ratios and slope stabilization proposals. 3. A statement from a registered engineer supported by factual data substantiating: a. The validity of the slope stabilization proposals; b. That other off-site problems will be mitigated; C. Stream flow calculations; d. Cut and fill calculations; and f. Channelization measures proposed. 18.84.100 Landscape Plan A. The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the Site Analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: t 1. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings; 2. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and S common open spaces, where applicable; and 3. Location, type and size of existing and proposed plant materials. t B. The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1. Soil conditions; and 2. Erosion control measures that will be used. E E L i i i t 1 IV-36 f CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: July 18 1983 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: July 14 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: City council- ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Appoint _ Continued matter to 7-18-83 Planning Commission Member REQUESTED BY: City Council DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: _ INFORMATION SUMMARY Selection Committee submitted the following names for appointment of vacant position expiring 7-1-84. 1. Brent Bishop t 2. Mark S. Zimel See attached citizen inventory forms. asaasa_aaasxsasasaacsassaxaasaxaaaaasa rsass====sass==a=s ssaa=a sass=aassass=aasaazxa ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A sgsasssssaaasssasasssasasasasasassasaaaaasa=.asaxa=az======saasa rasa:saeaa¢ssssaaas SUGGESTED ACTION Appointment of Planning Commission member. • a S t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 83 - 6ig A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, according to the provisions of Chapter 2.08.010, of the Tigard Municipal Code, the Planning Commission shall consist of nine members; and WHEREAS, one term of office for the Planning Commission is currently unfilled. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council of the City of Tigard that; SECTION 1: The following person be appointed to the Planning Commission for the term of office as indicated. Term Expires 7-1-84 PASSED: This day of July, 1983. Mayor - City cf Tigard ATTEST. Recorder - City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 83- r ' 1 lti V E iv i v n. OF C-r•r!ZPNS ,•ORY Suested for Community Service DATE t,; -.r ria J4B3 RES. PHONE 6 SK 2tV NAME_ zpmpT F. Bwilof ADDRESS-/,05-60 S cd PARR 6 rflCfT nr/�Ab BUS. PHONE LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN SUGGESTED BY �/cws p,4 rosr — WHERE 'DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND Ba.Gj+el•+r •F SGEtMGG Double /DTgibr U/bex.z- - 'on�� 19 +r+�?r� 1 :4 c. L -5c-I e OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND Se�-� Erio►oven(- Nd»+� i��rovt,r,en� • Preva°us Ia..ckro�at Salts o-„� Ma.�st e+«env .. PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY I174P •$•O '” 4%v � •� Li6rgt r:Ce -Gj+w:rrhK•t TwesF4•�:� eraw�.SA trp:VIEL 77 arfuss�Vt � ®Ivs.. a � wig+ 4,Xd YmCA 147V- /4 - ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES _7're ref Ba�'-THs�"-�' �{" r` J9?b-1T 7 • �" Orc E.i�c lJ•Kb�tfLdh'4�TS �l soa. � J-- 1482. !n 6 _ a.st s �;c•�r 2 s:b 6 J;i OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS) 7 J,,c,,yt a. Siacsre �e�%rte �o ;nVolyeAwi¢A t;4eCOnrsrre.ee:•ty .T .FceI -6e Coaar+:rref:ar. s� �*y Gells�a e�Ggrees � ao►'�1ey�n•.� h krou.vl Ga o- be Eaes� tl�•/; e•� i++ fla role o ae. �lAyl/l:ss+4 Cobs :ss:one' arni(. BOARDS OR COMMITTEES INTERESTED IN lani7%� Caa� s ion Date Received at City Ha.11—agiff Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board or Committee INSIDE CITY OUTSIDE. CITY - i July 1, 1983 Brent F. Bishop Bill Monahan, 10300 S.W. Park St. Planning and Development Director, City of Tigard, Oregon Tigard, Oregon 97223 12753 S.W. Ash Avenue 684-2940 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Monahan: Because of my fathers and one of my brothers seperate and individual involvements with the City of Tigard, I believe it is necessary to explain why I have requested nomination to the Tigard Planning Commission* thereby, avoiding any mis-conceptions about my decision or intentions. My reason for applying for a position on the Planning Commission resulted achievement of quality planning in Tigard, from my sincere interest in the the qualifications I have acquired to fulfil this interest, and the fact that there is no one under hc�age of 30 on the Planning Commission. did not discuss my decision to apply with anyoihe including family members, except for my wife, Leza; who enjoys living in Tigard and is supportive of my desire to be involved in civic affairs. If I am selected to serve on the Planning Commission I will act objectively to enforce the goals, guidelines and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations. I will not vote on any issues which I can not be objective or in which I have a conflict of interest. I will not discuss any planning matters with anyone outside of public meetings; nor, will I allow anyone to influence my planning decisions. My hope is that this letter will satisfy the concerns of those who will be asion idembers and will allow them to judge choosing the new Planning Commi me as they would any other qualified citizen of Tigard who has a sincere interest in the quality of life in Tigard. For information pertaining to my qualifications to serve as a Planning Commission member please refer to the enclosed resume. Sincerely, 7c Brent F. Bishop Enclosure y C.C.: Wilbur A. Bishop, Sr., Mayor of Tigard 96nneth Scheckla, City Councilor 4i John Cook, City Councilor r ' Tom Brian, City Councilor Ima Scott, City Councilor Bob Jean. City Administrator c Additional dopies available upon request. I 1 RESUME OF BRENT BISHOP PERSONAL DATA: Date of Birth, August,159 1956. Tigard Resident, 26 years. Married, Wife Leza and Daughter Meghan. Address, 10500 S.W. Park St., Tigard, Oregon. Phone Number, 684-2940. RIPLOYMM 4 years of experience in business management and sales, 1979 to present. Currently self-employed in the home improvement industry. 6 months counselling inner-city children for the City of Dublin, Ireland, 1979. - 4 979.4 summers performing residential and commercial construction and landscaping, 197019. EDUCATION- Graduate of Willamette University, 1978. Double 'Major in Urban Planning and Political Science. Relevant Courses; Urban Politics, Geology, Geography, City Planning, Urban Economics, Architecture, Urban Design, Psychology, and Political Theory. Research Papers; Political Consequences of Forced Annexations, Deter- mination and Enforcement of. Zoning Regulations, Providing Low-Income Housing, Architectural Design in the Urban Setting and The Use of O.L.C.C. Revenues to Fund Local Governments. Graduate, Tigard High: Gahobl, `1974 . CO�MM<JPiITY: Currently assisting, by request, a neighborhood group, in conjunction with the City of Beaverton, to correct flooding problems; created by over development and insufficient planning on the Fanno Creek flood plain adjacenb-.;to their homes. Worked with the Jay-Cees, in 1976, to raise funds for the Tigard City Library addition. Sole btudent member of the Tigard School :Districts Responsibility Committee, 1974. f Vice-Chairman, Tualatin Crawfish Festival, 1977; Treasurer, Beta Theta 1 Pi Fraternity, 1977-8; Publicity Director for a Mate high...sbhobl political organization, 1973-7 ; Member; Beta Theta Pi Fraternity, 1976 to present; Saint Anthony's Church, 1957 to present; and the Oregon Life Underwriters Association, 1981-83. 'f €( LkL \_ f i t e w F INVENTORY OF CITIZENS t Suggested for Community Service ' DATE— RES. ATE c' RES. PHONE NAME ��,/�E I' T 1 a r k- > �t AA V � ' ADDRESS PHONE � ��� ��� �� ��� I/ Sfal� LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD S SUGGESTED BY WHERE DID YOU 'LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND D I �5� � f-1 na U►�a �� aT 6 (� ' OCCUPAT= L STATUS AND BACKGROUND Iv2ialLLorV�oe i l /PlkSi/Ld j Ilit G N PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS) u a e-ctdk Lt)ti^71t l : a ' ' r` F t f { t BOARDS OR COMMITTEES INTERESTED IN "s r --------------------------------------------------------- 6 Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board or Committee F INSIDE CITY OUTSIDE CITY _ _ E i J 7 i July 18, 1983 ` I `s Mayor Wilbur Bishop & Council Members Tigard City Council t PO Box 23397 Tigard OR 97223 Dear Mayor Bishop and Council Members: t Since I am unable to attend tonight's Council meeting, due to a previous engagement, I feel it important to express my interest by letter. My reasons for applying for Tigard's Planning Commission are two-fold. First, at age 26, I have a lot to learn. I am very interested in development of all kinds and coordination of each development into an overall plan. Secondly, having worked in commercial development and leasing for the past five years, I feel I would have some insight to offer. As a resident of Tigard, I read The Times. This past Thursday, bJuly14, an article seemed to prejudge my qualifications on an app arentrelationship my father may likely enter into. Please let me assure }ou my motives are as stated above and not for personal gain. I understand I must always state any conflicts of interest. Please do not mistake my absence as a lack of interest. I ask you to consider both Brent and my applications on our qualifications rather than on who we know. Thank you and good luck, Mark Zimel MZ:ch M E M O R A N D U M TO: MAYOR AND CITY .VOUNCIL FROM: BOB JEAN, CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE: JULY 14, 1983 SUBJECT: SUMMER MEETINGS SCHEDULE Just a reminder of the scheduled meetings this Summer. Please let me or the Mayor know if you'll have any problems attending, what with vacations and all. Thanks. July 18 -- Special Meeting: Worksl.op with Park Board and Planning Commission ( July 25 -- 72nd Tour 6:15-7:15, Meet at City Hall -- Regular Meeting August 8 -- Regular Meeting August 15 -- Special Meeting and Council Rules Workshop, City Hall August 22 -- Parks Tour 6:00-7:00, Picnic Dinner and Summary Report, Meet at City Hall.. . -- Regular Meeting August 29 -- Special Meeting, City Administrator's Annual Review, City Hall September 23 -- Regular Meeting September 19 -- Study Session September 26 -- Regular Meeting RWJ : dkr Ji`-fir' A°"^ July 18 i Honorable Wilbur Bishop Mayor " John Cook Council " Ken Scheckla Council " Yom Brian Council " Ima Scott Council Bob Jean Administrator f Gentlemen: ! 1 should inform you that 1 am holding discussions with regal counsel concerning my property included in the 72nd Ave LID. As I have expressed repeatedly in the past at public meetings and by letter to the Council , I have not benefitted by the LID and improvements superior to those in the LID have already been made by the State of Oregon to which 1 contributed. icerel , n E Smets cc Schwabe Williamson Wyatt Moore Roberts; Attorneys t. Honorable Wilbur Bishop Mayor June 21 ,_ 1983 John Cook Council " Ken Scheckla Council interview f9r metabarship. on, Toff Brian Council the NPO:.5 0dv l so -rt' •,commI ttee Counci-I- x { Ima- Scott Bob Jean : Admini-stratpr Bill Monaghtin' .Director of Planning. I believe.-My ieve:my .publ ic. interview before the planning co»ani '!00" ers. was-inothle ► "' humiliating and maybe:..personally. damaging 'experience due to.:.lack of:advance J� ` ti notification of the material to be. covered. After opening remarks;by me, the hostility of. the Interview became appar�ent< < i with Commissior.-_rs. askang questions based on letters to their �ttentton. L objecting to my membership. Six letters of objection of �.'hfoh '� had'`n� advance -warning to prepare. edged No names were ident'if.ied so i could properly recall ttie 3ncident_alla - i .e: disrupting the .meetEng. To which I pointed out: tle dual -cHairmnshinship : _ situation in my opinion made any actions taken of little_ 1st NP0 ,5vaiue in the future. i,.e. calling a policeman in. John the Cheir+han was: demonstrating ; one of his more sewers tantrums. 0 believe Jeremy oyer reacted in pique. This kind .of charge can be used down .the line by any,self serving individual or. group in a defamatory .way.) B.il1 Bieker agreed with my version of the NPO change...;n cha E rmanshi p- at the. time. The committee .as I assume it `is now•composed I.s focused very narrowly. on neighborhood interests_ to'.the detriment of' the community of: the whole. Basically, newcommer.s wanting to keep others out, thru.down zoning and other procedural dev'i ces:` At one point during the NPO'5. ineet i ng wh I ch' I' attended the P Val d. Pantry: was referred by one member as business of-that ilk. DemonstratEng in my opinion ,lack of. objectivity. The quality of staff presentations was: on the..low 6h&-due. ., and/or lack':.of.:clear markii5g ;of" reference maps together w�th. generalavEng towErd the map to• describe.'a' s pecff e_c area on. t t i ..would_ suggest that NPOs i f_-tfidy .:are:.td be of ariy 'voiue n_ed t tie be'cs'�en� down Tnto Business' and residential div*ts+60S to `avert'or a m.�iCts 06; tie :friction T between_s ;'•of :sgae resi'cientiat: ,members anal'men) 01 elfishnessr,►iZtii�bui;;lrtsss who .necessari.iy must. consjder, a:much.broader pictuce :'tru,':�leal triglt'h nth@ ':' f ubi`ic and overnmental or anizatlons.. Time and resultse much ltnpOr#af r p g 9 " r pe ole th®rn take far: t6o mach' time be i The-NPOs as �. y •_Wasted time Es non+ rodactiue a s � • r gained. Time is mons P.- ,1 believe tl5e count i 1 shbu i`d 1 ook. in �to .this -,l hr tdept, and deinactd � ' ( Final iyi d.i:sci l,inart csiease�t�e t� i fture fd l �repork `.a♦id take= fii�e:,�ecea.sat-y p Y of c i t i' Qn .ambush aria b'u5hwacki ng. wi'l l not' be .repeageid'� jESme o nt 30 SW Bonita s k June 21 , 1983 P k I; Pon orat7e Wilbur Dishop� flavor John Cooky ,; Counca'i Counci l dam Ptli.ai Council `• " Ima-Scutt Counci l Boti� Jean - .Administrator Re LID, 21 .�1 Prel;imi-nary-Assessment Map. - Property #68;115a;115b 'e L'm convinced- there is a serious flaw in the boundary line which includes my property. for. LfD,21.. ,. In the -fi.rst .place, my;frontage is a frontage street with improvements to State standards for which I gave up extra frontage at the time. There have been. no improvements to my' frontage or frontage on the South side of Bonita between. i i frontage and Interestate 5 by LID 21 . My requirements to use S.W. 72nd Avenue. are none since our business can be served from any direction via Bonita' . -from the East via Interestate 5. ON THE OTHER HAND property fronting on Bonita between properties 113a; 113b, and 28.and the railroad were not included in the LID.Why? Also there is a much longer reach to include my property than property west of Bonita. There was obviously no even-handed application. The properties between 113a- and b-, and128 and the railroad are absolutely dependent on 72nd. -The Rolling�Hill.s:. nei4bborhood, .which had no ingress or egress other than 72nd, has not been'.i nc'1 uded'•i-n i_;:D 21. In addition, an extra expense for them was expensive traffic si,gpa.ls. 'Why? I understand that other. .properties which were in LID 21 have been deleted: 113a 113b;anti 28;:onB6nita, 112 and 110 on 72nd. (`hese are all that I am aware of at this time:. )Wfiy7 The actions .of. the coune'i-l. and staff over my repeated requests in public and by letter to be excluded from LID 21 have been nil and I am bein�] put in a humiliating posttigjn. to have .tg DEMAND to be excluded from LID 21 and relief from the financial . . burden, together,wi th return of money paid to date on the Bancroftbonding. r. ?' Thank you- for giv:f,ng this request your most serious and prompt attention. Res'ec.tfu 1y., v� �� .�' .:Sets. ' • , W'. • ,oni to Ppad n, ; Ti. ard, `Oregon 37223.. . t CITYOFTIOARD WASHII, . COUNTY.OREGON July 14, 1983 MR. JIM HOLTON, COMMANDER TIGARD POST NO. 158, THE AMERICAN LEGION P.O. BOR 23482 TIGARD. OREGON 97223 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PARK FEE WAIVER Dear Mr. Holton: I was first contacted by Mr. Scheckla on the phone regarding your request for a Park Fee waiver two months ago. I advised him that such a waiver would require Park Board approval and that I do not have independent authority to grant the waiver. I advised him to send a letter requesting the waiver. On July 14, 1983 I received your letter dated July 9, 1983 requesting a waiver of the, Park Fee for your July 16, 1983 reservation. Obviously, Park Board and other authorizations cannot be obtained before July 16, 1983 : I will, therefore, forward your request for a refund through channels. Yours truly, CITY OF TIGARD •AY Robert W. earn City Adm `istrator RWJ : dkr CC : Frank Currie, Public Works Director Mayor and City Council t r 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639.4171 C1TY OF T117A RD July 15, 1983 WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON Mrs. Geraldine Ball 11515 SW 91st Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Transcript Request Dear Mrs. Ball: Your request for a transcript of the testimony of Paul Hughes at the July 12, 1983 Planning Commission meeting has been forwarded to my desk. After numerous attempts to contact you by phone the last few days, I have decided to make the contact by letter. Due to numerous requests being received over the last year, a new policy statement has been issued from the City Administrator's office. The Word Processing Center will now supply transcripts to citizens only upon receiving written request with payment for the job in advance. I estimate that the transcription job should take approximately 2 hours and would cost $32.00, and the copying which you have requested along with the transcript would cost $11.25. if you wish Word Processing to complete this job, please send a letter of request along with a check in the amount of $43.25. Upon completion of the transcript, which will be completed when the City's workload permits (normally this can be accomplished within a week) , we will call you to pick up the work. If the job does not take the full 2 hours, the appropriate refund will be sent to you in the mail. However, if the job requires more than 2 hours, you will need to pay the additional charges before receiving your copy of the transcript. If you would prefer to have a copy of the tape from that portion of the meeting, please furnish a blank cassette tape to this office along with a $10.00 non-refundable fee to cover duplication costs. Should you have any questions regarding this procedure, please feel free to contact me at 639-4171. Sincerely, Loreen Wilson, Office Manager lw/0333A 12755 S.W. ASH P.O BOX 23397 TIGARD. OREGON 97223 PH: 639-4171 MEMORANDUM July 14, 1983 TO: Wreen Wilson, Office Manager FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator 4 SUBJECT: Procedure For Handling Transcript Requests As of this date, any transcript requests which come to the City will be forwarded to the Word Processing Center. An estimate will be compiled by the Center of the time needed to complete the transcript and the cost of such job. This information will be forwarded to the requestor. Before a transcript may be started, the requestor must file with the City a written request for the work with payment of the estimated cost. Word Processing will complete the transcript when the City's workload permits. Normally, this can be accomplished within one week. Upon completion of the transcript, Word Processing will call the requestor to pick up the job at the Reception Center. A requisition will be completed by Word Processing to refund any money still on deposit after expenses. If the job took a longer he the additional iod of time charge beforerlreceivinga anticipated,copy of the requester will pay transcript. (BJ:lw/0333A) M E M 0 R A N 0 U M DATE: July 18, 1983 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Jerri L. Widner, Finance Director SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF OREGON BLUE BOOK Today, Councillor Scott asked if the City provided the Oregon Blue Book to each Council member. It is my understanding that the City has not purchased Blue Books for Councillors in the past. If you would like these to be purchased for you from the Council budget, please let Doris know. If you do not want the City to pay for the Blue Books, the following information is for your use in purchasing the book on your own: Oregon Blue Book $5.00 per copy-postpaid Orders may be directed to Norma Paulus, Secretary of State State Capitol, Salem, Or. 97310 The City has two copies of the Blue Book, one in Administration and one in Word Processing.