The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 03/14/1983 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate MARCH 14, 1983, 7:30 P.M. sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ask to be recognized by the Chair. Non-agenda LECTURE ROOM items are asked to be kept to 2 minutes or less and are heard at the discretion of the Chair. 1. REGULAR L.EETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff, Council & Audience For Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda 2. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - Public Hearing Continued 2.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP • Public Hearing Opened • Summation by Director of Planning & Development • Public Testimony o Public Hearing Closed • Consideration/action by Council • ORDINANCE NO. 83- Adopting Comprehensive Plan Map 2.2 INTERIM ZONING MAP • Public Hearing Opened • Summation by Director of Planning & Development • Public Testimony • Public Hearing Closed ® Consideration/action by Council • ORDINANCE NO. 83- Adopting Interim Zoning Map • Public Hearing Continued to possible dates (3/15, 3/16, and/or 3/17) 3. ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS 3.1 ZCA 3-82 (Durham Island) NPO *5/y6 3.2 ZCA 5-82 (Bechtold Annexation) NPO 83 3.3 ZCA 7-82 (North Dakota Annexation) NPO *2/7 3.4 ZCA 17-82 (Randall) NPO #4 3.5 ZCA 16-82 (Cooper) NPO i4 3.6 ZCA 11-82 (Benny Larson) NPO s3 • Public Hearing Opened 4. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request _ that an item be removed for discussion and separate action. Motion to: D. 4.1 Approve Expenditures and Investments: $ 124.344.39 4.2 Accept Sight-of-Way Regarding 72nd Avenue LID 4-3 Accept Street Dedication - Forrest Cowgill 4.4 Approve OLCC Applications As Follows: • Gaffer's , 206/207 Tigard Plaza, Tigard, Oregon, Class A License (Hall Blvd. & Pacific Hwy.) • Big B Thriftway, 14363 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard, Oregon, New License (Canterbury Square) • Bergmann's Restaurant, 12725 SW Pacific Hwy., Tigard, Oregon (McKenzie St. & Pacific HWY.) • Tigard Bowl, 11660 SW Pacific Hwy., Tigard, Oregon, RMB (Pfaffle & Pacific Hwy.) 4.5 Approve Resolution NO. 83-_27 Vacation - Kable Street 4.6 Approve Engineering Services Agreement 4.7 Approve Ash Pacific LID #38 Consultant Selection 4.8 Approve Right-of-Way Acquisition on SW 72nd Avenue LID 821 5. RADIFY FLOODPLAIN POLICY • Director of Planning & Development 6. SOLID WASTE AMENDMENT ORDINANCE No. 83- An ordinance amending the Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 11, Solid Waste Management to permit rate increases. • Public.Works Director o Consideration/action by Council • ORDINANCE NO. 83- Adopting Solid Waste Amendment 7. OPEN AGENDA 8. ADJOURN NOTE: The cut-off date on last years ZCA is 3/18/83. (0316A) TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 14, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors Tom Brian, John Cook, Kenneth Scheckla, Ima Scott (leaving at 11:05 P.M. ) ; Jeremy Coursolle, Associate Planner; City Staff Doris Hartig, Finance Director/City Recorder; Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Director of Planning and Development; Liz Newton, Associate Planner; Ed Sullivan, Legal Counsel. 2. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA (a) No one appeared to speak. 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP (a) Public Hearing Reopened by Mayor (b) Associate Planner Coursolle noted letters in Council's packet dealing with the same area (west of Hwy. 217 and South of 99W property). Other areas of concern are properties at SW 66th Avenue and I-5 Freeway and deal with change from CP to Commercial designation. All letters speak to more general commercial type use. 3.1 NPO #4 (a) Public Testimony o Lavalle Allen, 7540 SW Hermosa May, NPO #4, recommended properties west of SW 70th to Hwy. 217 be zoned general commercial. o Cordon Martin, 12265 SW 72nd P_venue referred to a letter dated February 28, 1983 that contains all the issues of concern to the NPO. He urged higher zone designation so property will become more valuable and thereby it will be economically feasible for homeowners to relocate as well as allow for property to develop. o Councilor Scheckla questioned long-range plans for Phil Lewis School. Staff responded that during the planning period the City was assured the school will stay. o Gary Reid, 12700 SW 72nd, Tigard, NPO #4 member, and business owner spoke to the conversion idea for homeowners and felt light industrial lacks the flexibility as general commercial zone, as well as it doesn't provide for transition period and is extremely difficult against low density residential areas. He noted the main issue is residential owners being able to economically sell their homes and compete with vacant industrial land. He urged general commercial zoning in this area. PAGE 1 - OUN N' - t o Geraldine L. Ball, representing herself and DJB Inc. , 11515 SW 91st Tigard, recommended general commercial zoning for Larson property. She questioned if her property is designated as wetlands or floodplain and by whose authority is it so designated. She also objected to incorrect maps used by the Boundary Review Commission #1910 annexation. She submitted maps for records and an album, noting the environmental impact statement report. o Planning Director requested time for staff to review her testimony and respond to her questions later in the evening. Council concurred. o Virginia Campbell, 12120 SW 72nd, NPO #4, agreed with Martin and Reid's testimony and requested if any transition zone is provided that they not be included in that zone. o Fred Anderson, Attorney representing Dietzman property, stated he is in accord with NPO #4 recommendation. O David Campbell, 12120 SW 72nd, reported he was in favor of commercial designation and endorsed his wife's comments. He expressed concern for the quality of life for remaining residential property owners. He suggested a buffer zone around property be removed. o Lou Christen, 17895 SW Shasta Trail, Tualatin, spoke to the transportation plan and in his opinion didn't think the secondary road will ever be developed. The road is too close to the Phil Lewis School. He addressed the issue of trying to sell his property with the incorrect floodplain designation. He reported he has some sensitive land areas but felt there was lack of staff support. Staff responded that his property was incorrectly designated and the map has been corrected. Council suggested the corrected information be posted and Mr. Christen receive utter from staff giving designation. Christian continued testimony stating he was in favor of general commercial zoning. G Donald Maltine, representing Coldwell Banker, 12755 SW Buena Vista Dr. and representing Mr. Finke, stated he was in accord with commercial designation. He noted industrial land in this area is too expensive for development and supported the staff's proposal. o Merrill Haddon, 13545 S.W. Village Glan Drive representing Invest-A-Venture, testified in favor of the commercial zone designation. He noted his proposed recreation center and requested it be allowed. He also commented industrial designation is not suitable for this area as well as the impact of that kind of development on schools and transportation problems. Councilor Scott questioned Haddon regarding type of recreation center. Mayor Bishop responded the issue is whether the land is to be zoned industrial park or commercial. PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 14, 1983 t Councilor Scott referred her question to Attorney Sullivan. r Attorney Sullivan responded the issue is to decide whether it is appropriate to zone this property industrial or commercial. The basic land use issue will be decided if it is a permitted outright land use. Only item for consideration at a later date would be Site Design Review. o David Sant, JaSant Corp, representing client in Invest-A-Venture, supported the commercial designation for the triangle area- He noted j most industrial areas want to avoid residential areas due to potential conflict over industrial uses. The configuration of the property does not lend itself to large industrial development of the triangle area. In his opinion, the highest potential use for the land is commercial development. i o Ted Williams, 4382 45th Avenue N.E. , Salem, spoke in favor of NPO #4 F proposal and concurs with the plan and feels it is in the best interest of Tigard. o JB Bishop, Suite 303, 10505 S.W. Barbur Blvd. , Portland, displayed aerial photo of area and spoke to future development. He encouraged Council to review the City inventory of industrial park land and } general commercial areas. He suggested the area be a mix of uses ; some industrial park and some commercial uses. He urged development of the transportation plan and the providing of City services. o John Gibbon, Counsel for Robert Randall, owner of property adjoining Finke spoke in favor of Commercial designation. He feels a mixture ' of office/warehouse space would be suitable for their area. He urged a good transportation and pedestrian system be developed for the area especially around Phil Lewis School. He continued on and recommended all their property be zoned commercial as some of it is now in a split zone. o Terry Loller, 11682 S.W. Tooze Rd. , Wilsonville, representing Sam Sofos, urged general commercial designation, not industrial zoning. o Hans Grunbaum, property owner in triangle area endorsed commercial development. o Jim Corliss, resident and operator of Landmark Ford, supported commercial designation of entire area. o Jean Danley, 7060 S.W. Beveland, supported commercial designation to her property. o City staff returned to the meeting and responded to Mrs. Ball's letter. Staff noted Mr. Larson's property was not omitted in the annexation. City 1977 map does not indicate her property is in the floodplain, however, it is possible a portion of land could be in the wetlands, i.e. having a high water table. Staff reported the Boundary Review Commission maps were incorrect, however, the boundary PAGE 3 -- COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 14, 1983 description is the binding documents and maps are for illustrative purposes only. The legal metes and bounds description submitted was correct. Planning Director further responded to the rest of Mrs. Ball's questions. Council and staff discussed the designation of wetland and use of the property when time for development arrives. RECESSED AT 9:45 P.M. RECONVENED AT 10:06 P.M. o Mayor Bishop questioned if Council wanted to meet again this week to complete the work on the Comprehensive Plan Map. He noted the Zone Change Annexations have to be decided by March 18, 1983. Consensus was to meet Wednesday, March 16, 1983, 7:30 P.M. at Fowler Junior High School. o Councilor Cook suggested the area of Franklin east of 72nd should be changed to commercial professional, he suggested Legal Counsel assist with the language in dealing with existing residential properties, conversation and buffering. o Councilor Brian expressed concern for conversion from light industrial to commercial professional; the request for C-5 for property on I-5 Freeway and agrees with general commercial designation. Councilor Scheckla agreed with Brian's comments endorsing general commercial. He noted roads and transportation is an item of great concern. o Mayor Bishop expressed his concern regarding the proposed extension from SW 78th/99W to Interchange at I-5 Freeway to Haines. He recommended this be in place before any development takes place (or a legal agreement to complete collector road). He also stated he would like to consider the possible use of some residential medium density in that area and encourage above the first floor commercial development, to residential uses. He agreed with other Council members with strict interpretation of development of collector streets. o Council and City At -orney discussed at length specific language to implement Council's recommendation. Council clarified areas on the map (exhibit to these minutes) the noted changes in zoning. Legal Counsel requested he be allowed to leave the meeting to draft, motion to work out details with interested property owners and bring back for Council consideration. Council concurred. Councilor Scott left at 11:05 P.M. PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 14, 1983 r 3.2 NPO #3 (a) Public Testimony ` o Associate Planner Coursolle noted 4 letters in Council packet and referred to property involved on the map (Moellman & Bankey, Dalton) they have requested medium density and staff concurs with all 3 changes. o Lou Ane Mortensen, 11150 S.W. Fonner, noted NPO #3 major objections to the plan, especially regarding high density issues and impact on traffic. She also read into the record a letter from Herman Porter, 11875 S.W. Gaarde, objecting to higher density in their area. He also is opposed to medium density on Bechtold property. o Bob Bledsoe, 11800 S.W. Walnut, noted correction on maps (near 99W & Beef Bend). He stated his opposition to general commercial designation on S.W. Walnut parcel near Circle K store. He would like to see it medium density or neighborhood commercial. He spoke to the Bechtold property and presented NPO #3 alternative proposal regarding density issues. o Fred Anderson, representing wife, son of R.C. Wyatt, property owner on frontage road between Bull Mt. and Beef-Bend Road on 99W; stated he did not want zoning changed. With regard to Paul Place it can stay as RU-4 or be zoned C.L. provided Wyatts piece and Beef-Bend Ar Road property is C.P. Staff suggested C.L. . Anderson did not object. k. o Larry Barnum, 14405 S.W. Hazelwood Drive, resident near Bechtold property testified against high or medium density designation on Bechtold property. He expressed concern regarding traffic volume, and crime element increasing. o Don McCain, 13950 S.W. 121st, spoke to Bechtold property and is opposed to medium density, addressed crime aspects, impact on schools and does not want to lose quality of school system. He requested low density. o Mrs. McCain, 13950 S.W. 121 was concerned with the development of f roadway and the setbacks that will impact their property. o Don Larson, 13870 S.W. 121st across from Bechtold property agrees with NPO #3 and last speaker. t o Glen Tight addressed traffic control on Gaarde Avenue and spoke to tax ratio for apartments vs. school taxes. He favored low density. o Wayne Roe, resident, across from Bechtold property, voiced his concern regarding traffic problems and high density issue. o Jessie Flowers, 11700 S.W. Gaarde spoke to traffic problems on Gaarde and is apposed to medium density on Bechtold property. PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 14, 1983 o Vittz Ramsdell 11635 Terrace Trails, addressed Bechtold property density and traffic issues. o Ralph Flowers 11700 S.W. Gaarde, spoke to Bechtold annexation and expresses support of low density issue. o Discussion by Council regarding testimony followed. Councilor Scheckla favored low density for Bechtold property on Walnut Avenue. Council suggested medium high permit use or C.P. zone on Beef-Bend property. Associate Planner Newton pointed out and marked areas on map and made a part of this record, marked Exhibit "A". (b) Motion by Councilor Cook the 4 changes as discussed be made as outlined on the map with respect to NPO #3. Councilor Brian seconded the motion. o Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 3.3 NPO #4 (a) Attorney Sullivan, returned to the meeting and reviewed the proposed statement that represents a consensus of property owners. Council discussed the specifics and intent of the motion as well as the impact on proposed development. (b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian, that the Plan Map designations for NPO #4 recommended to Council by the Planning Commission be approved and, in addition the 3 other changes shown on the map, marked as Exhibit "A": , be adopted by Council. The following additional policies are also adopted for the development in NPO #4 specified below. "Z. In the Tigard Triangle (i.e. that area bounded by Pacific Highway, Highway 217, and the Interest 5-Freeway) , in those parcels designated "CP", High Density Residential Development (i.e. 20 to 40 units per acre) shall be a use allowed outright in conjunction with commercial professional uses. "2. In the Tigard Triangle described above, those parcels designated for any (3) Commercial development shall not develop for such use, if not already so developed, unless a major collector, connecting the area on Pacific Highway at approximately 78th Avenue and the Westerly portion of Haines Road Interchange at Interstate Freeway (at approximately 69th at Dartmouth) be constructed, be guaranteed within one year for construction by a public agency, or be approved for construction as a part of a local improvement district after the remonstrance and review period have expired. This condition shall not apply to parcels having direct access to Pacific Highway, or the Interstate 5 Freeway access ramps unless the portion proposed for development is greater than 1000' from the right-of-way line of Pacific Highway or InLerstate 5 Interchange ramps. PAGE 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 14, 1983 I i I "Until new commercial development is permitted in the triangle under this condition, the only new development that may occur on any parcel in the triangle is a single family residential use." Brain stated he was uncomfortable without suggestions from the property owners as to how to get the job done. Motion approved by 3-1 majority vote of Council present, Councilor Brian voting "NAY". 4. ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS o ZCA 3-92 (Durham Island) NPO #5/#6 ZCA 5-82 (Bechtold Annexation) NPO #3 ZCA 7-82 (North Dakota Annexation) NPO #2/#7 ZCA 17-82 (Randall) NPO #4 ZCA 16-82 (Cooper) NPO #4 ZCA 11-82 (Benny Larson) NPU #3 o Public Hearing Opened By consensus of Council Mayor continued public hearing until March 17, 1983, 7:30 P.M. Fowler Junior High School. 5. RADIFY FLOODPLAIN POLICY Planning Director requested this item be continued to give Council change for further review. Council concurred. 6. APPROVE EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: $124,344.39 (a) Motion Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 7. ACCEPT RIGHT-OF-WAY REGARDING 72ND AVENUE LID a (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to accept. F Approve by unanimous vote of Council present. 8. ACCEPT STREET DEDICATION - Forrest Cowgill (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to accept. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 9. APPROVE OLCC APPLICATIONS AS FOLLOWS: 4. o Gaffers, 206/207 Tigard Plaza, Tigard, OR Class A License o Big B Thirftway, 14363 SW Pacific Hwy, New License (Canterbury Square) s o Bergmann's Restaurant, 12725 SW Pacific Hwy, (McKenzie S Pacific Hwy. ) o Tigard Bowl, 11660 SW Pacific Hwy, R1-1B (Pfaffle & Pacific Hwy. ) E i (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve I f Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. PAGE 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 14, 1983 I G 10. RESOLUTION NO. 83-27 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING VACATION OF A PORTION OF SW KABLE STREET A 20-FOOT WIDE DEDICATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. (a) Motion to adopt: Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 11. APPROVE ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT (a) Motion to approve: Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 12. APPROVE ASH-PACIFIC LID #38 CONSULTANT SELECTION (a) Motion to approve: Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 13. APPROVE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION ON SW 72ND AVENUE LID #21 (a) Motion to approve: Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 14. COriPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN MAP AND INTERIM ZONING MAP (a) Mayor announced the public hearing will be continued to March 17, 1983, 7:30 P.M. Fowler Junior High School. 15. SOLID WASTE AMENDMENT ORDINANCE NO. 83- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 11, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT TO PERMIT RATE INCREASES. I (a) This item was set over to a date in the future by consensus of Council. F 2 16. ADJOURNMENT 12:15 A.M. t City Recorder / / P ATTEST: E i Mayor PAGE 8 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 14, 1983 Da to March 14, 1983 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) 1.3 Call To Staff, Council & Audience For Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda Name, Address & Affiliation Item Description Te Ik X C s. f z E f E t� DATE March 14, 1983 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council (Please Print your name) on the following item: 3. ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM DESCRIPTION' t OPPONENT (against) F PROPONENT (For) and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation Name , Address r i' N Y F 4}� 1gd R r( I � 1 Date March 14, 1983 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) 2.2 INTERIM' ' ZONING MAP PUBLIC HEARING (COMPR. PLAN) Name, Address & Affiliation Item Description 00, At / � �,.._' ` ,'S �. c. . •� � �- �<� �i S i S dam', w' .9'l%�-�"--� �C. 1-�,, "Z 1`_ T�9,,�, Cz-cJ j �S 1rS .. /'�9'� 1��.=�✓_ Ti�r,H�2. _ '7 7 Z � _--Lv��—`�----- Cts '7 \� �VI �i`'�� qu. ,�t�t. ; � ( �,�-tc/►A/a-�-��P CJ`s r� _ - � ��s-� l�✓OAC ?� _ ------ --- Q Po 7 I�i��a�� I� r�� V � � ` ��P2 S e GC O (/tt�'T a�u�l f�d 1�c c�l �b�'s- S��'�Li,vss ,,J � � ,�� 3 - �. i -_ r....=M----Aa-�--- .�_..- , -� ,. Da to March 14, 1983 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) 2.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP PUBLIC HEARING Name , Address & Affiliation Item Description Y Cf , ��''''''��oC1 ^ar,G + .c 1 '_C / u. y,l L•.�1 - TtC ell P Q n �� lam_ 44 GLS; Y A7 PO - `f - 20 7� V s } Ze A-" �= r'2rs i ®3ti�3 14jenlal42.1 L--j Q M rLh Lns i vL I 9Ait'rls�Ill ltjW tjtlyt tjt,ijW ejtlrjt rjt tjt tjt eft 1' t t s't i � � � � I �. I f ��I�� j T'? � ir�t7e]iitls7_.�si+lsll+sl��Ts�ti+l+lr[tl+j►i°�rj+6+l+�sl�'als�sis0+ls�sis�+lJ�stai+lt�sl+ists�sls�ri,le;sir+s S' —�'_' NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED i .-_. _�. ._..S. 2 .. 3 4 - - $ 6- __ $ 9 it0 DRAMAS, IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF TFE ORIGINAL _ DRAWING. - oe sz sz sz ozsz zzia oz sr—.e Of sr.__.al el-__zi- ii-oi e e i 9 __s ___� �nsCrsultus�tudnss�suttlut�sutlN�s�ttst6 {7 �t3tll�tlNael�a�{sL-_'11 ,utla M A R("J"H 9tH a 1 t Y e TLEGEND IGARD ® I 4 > COMPREHENSIVE RESIDENTIAL I .�/ If,fl PLAN LOW DENSITY 1.5 UNITS/ACRE - ��qq t� „i i �✓ MAP MEDIUM DENSITY 2 UNITSIACRE MED-HIGHDENSITY UNITSIACRE HIGH DENSITY 2040+UNITS/AC REOCTOBER 1982 ;-' I g - fLF -, `-�4TfF'[SY7�-A,,T"p' 1'f[ i G• 'y7 � COMMERCIAL I\/ , 1 1 h l ' �f ( I I r TT' ryq�rw RD PRELIMINARY: NEIGHBORHOOD (C•N) 1\ _- _ , - I T 1It � -I li I,I j �j�BI o LINEAR (C•L) , I�"j lyl, c p k FOR - �� WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (C-P) :11- �.LI B, DISCUSSION CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) I �•LI i E ��(''•I -L°-' i � PURPOSES _ � L' I+,•-• 1' N- INDUSTRIAL -!LJ.d.J._11:`Li: L6- rr'I. 1' ONLY. ((` I' ,T.T.r*r1'��,� a ...r.; LIGHT. 0•L) s � IFF��.�. 7�,,-'L' .. -..tif� I�i��,`,. I �t57 HEAVY (I•H) -� f" ` �;� i::-.� _ i 'I I gl cm of nDAno,oREaoN aANUARv+oaz� PUSLIC/INSTITUTION (PUBIINS) �V -3� I �I'^ •�"' �} `I� SCALE:i••-8001 OPEN SPACE (OS) / L Tom\ -.::i STRICT :.•L� (.:1:.. � 1:�, V•� FOR INFORMATION ABOUT CORRESPONDING ZONING DIry ��----Ty- �� u } r AIML 1111'im CONTACT THE TGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 850.1171. / .r F �6...iT� •L_ii1.!!.Ll LLI rd L! VIR L - �� J ee _I `1�-��L I_�� -... ' - E� os ��'L� \��1,�1 ,I.•'�� r�I�_ i ' �I� I '� ��I� -H'Z�"�;•�:zs'� �`• MED- i WB' •` o ee F �--^ h -- F'7 �`•1 /�., - PEI �.II J. MED w::. � I.1• \� 3 / /-__ 7 ems` I � - 1 ��• � L 1� w�+• � �.� i NE i L 1 — (, � U9 •�� - - me ` �- �CP ..�• j �P Lll:',-,�� _ T-1 \ :� MEDPub- .'�.• L �. Ep. r .""'_ro._._ � a - ' Lni•1 /Ns " IN$ M y�1 ' �- �' �GIM17Ii `_f:-� _ _ _ 1 • I e •, in Im ��_ �} �-\ ;®fid ♦ ! L,1 �� t-�, MED- HIGH rJ"- _ tAE ♦ Asp. 'r- -I �{.� I, !• I MED_-J.. -L V ;L F _I[,11 � ` �rr� �4-- I - LOW I n._��t :� ` ''">: �• '� )/ WCL x� ``� '/Z-L 11 rD">P-�i-_� Yom" . - i 1)�_ -, -I � I ` _ .®.� _ �� - ryy�I� �/� � YY" � t•1Ec t e• , 6�1 �� ,q �� \ �I ,i 3 J i rF �• - I -- . 1M:_ r.r.vr4 L1 J� TS � . I - r ' .I '�7��': I��-�} [T Ir�T�T"I I �I��- !,•� (tlYl�d �` _ d � I _��•, l- � .� I� �::_.s _ PUD- l t- - �.+ 71 I-• Ii -_ LOW t, jO.♦ME7 y�I NS Lq IL � OW LOW .. LOW1100 A MED MEG 1�IFP �\- c z s 1 �f ''T`� e MED MED. I ♦ �D+� I j I E D }mac- e MED .I I n • I r fL m i IILJ d ED i NFN6 ' 1 LOW fill L� CIS TIVA WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON I;;J! L i'IIIIII111111111I1IIll III1111111g1111t 11I1111111I1111111I i1T1111 []pp]1111111 1111111 III 111,1111111 IIIIIII 1111111 111 II,,11 III III II 111 II', 1 I III 1 I r NOTE: IF THIS MI.A-AD I 2 3 4 5 I 5 I 7 1 1 8 I I 11 9 1 1111to l I I III IIII 11111111121 _ dll& AM OR M NO IS.IT OLEAR '10 nils MAL'TY IT IS mE IN 11E�IIALITY OF TIE ORIGINAL OE 62 Be LZ 92 $2 42 EZ 22 12 0261I1 81 LI 91 51bb�l EI 21 II 0I 1 6 S L 9 5 b E 2 ✓nl,mhnllw hNal,uII Iuhullunhnllnuhullwduulnn4L1I1mJ;!1IIIIIIIIIIIIBUIWIIIIIIIILIIIIIIIIIU IIU11111IUllIlUlINI11W11111111111IIIIIli1UIUIII7IIIIUUIIU,111111UDIIIRIRRIuulNnlln____I ___TIu11I1nII1ulIIwhB,JW11llllIW�llulllullRlluu6ln MARCH 7 ,1990 CITYO�TI AIS CIT' OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY. REGON CITYOF TIMM WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON CITIZEN'S 1 SIVE PLAN PUBLIC ME!NGS INGS SUMMARY OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANDHEARINGS Tb o delft Comprah°nsive Plan is divided uD AT PATER-0 LAND RRSODRCES ODALIIf ••t.bl!•h•d are••, and address .Gave related Ilford. The report di nuns.. the cnedUsrio¢ into cloven aUunts. the foll.ing nee tion bon•!%Lesvos, of land ,u plan* and ley ..m....till. DetefiJ.lone lice each of[bona,leuvt.. Thin report pIaaclly eddrnw• the Ino •r,l policies na.d Lap lo altatlon NOIICH IS HHR3Wr CMN that GDe City of Tigard 1. in the 9...... of eoordl'Itio, can the Cit: and othoe PUBLIC PICILITIHS ARD SRYyICBS °° ui•i% SU Cemrohnaiw Plan an-lad-devolo L CITI28N Iw90LP®(®'I federal, stat and sera,.. CIlat yh{. sir.UEies ttl..tify enurwt Toa the pnaa Sciaticas S.oed., eeEioval report review• the our eat Public lnttlnl derby source the cooly ity,.haul- [° miry the City's eomrohen-!va D1•vglng •[fort• a�t;:,,.le.^^',d•velopmnt h{e rapoet •--ruses U• need for eo,ti.a% ragulaU air and water Quality •ed rogloul heSiitl•s end urviroa mitD":".ye r'ded by the exylor.. •Conservation to Lbe cheapest •orgy ordl.nese. Ont GEe last yue the City Dae G'rY': Tu`..,:1nE mnehly eSLlsn ivvolvam.nt in the Dlnv,inE process. lid waste di•poeal. dlthovgh the City doaa City oe Dy a vps<Snl diatra�c e:.: tiro •vd rro, met roedlly available. I've Neighborhood Panning on,alzatido (RPO) aad Comittu for CitLzen Th. report indicate• the existing major not Tat thus staddarde, tDero are numrous wGr. no topic •.a. Include: core •vvtrovm•atnlly detricantal nd mat III —It me[ip,s to -tell°- --clove I..... ...telling IS...We lead prorwea. of Ili... "nvolvauat: GG • n wa�• !° rhleIl the City n aid !v U• water, storm tlro Lase,`firm, IOU— library, I".mod by local policy. vee Planclng process an-the P"Poeld change•to that pr..°°.. Neighborhood Planning Or •a• Smisvantatin of `Leu stanched.. Por ar 8 S SenlUiioca (NPO) ':d •aaml•, [Ile l.eotion o[•Cee.0 and eoeda an -chool, and belle e o la Tilt U- t° nem • DHEANIZATION the committee roe eiti... Invelv.mvt n rea. The roPore also .,:sante the Poll III Ue fC.c.Z.). It da.reit•.the bo,marl•°of...h aid In the redaction or lie venation. Iv and taplematatto¢ ,t,&togioo that the City he Urbanization —part develop. • feamwet Neighborhood Pl.—I.. Or6•vlz.tlon (NPO) mai%n will c.ntinve to De NPO area. In addition, the report dncrsbes eddl Glen, chi- report ..Sg..t. I'll" •hall- -do,c to vvr- that edpuate public within which all do,.l.Pmnt noti,ittes have held a, nudad by ...D RPO ch•frpar.... and the Petit melt{.: dote' the role or neh of thea.orgsvizaLiem Sn Uo Panel" end Smlementatin tece,gUs taeilltie• aad aarvleae s provided a° CG to D• a ordiaatod. hs roD.et ivt•Erau. end Old Gia-,will De p,bll•had in the Tim,a wall,e Posted in City Hall. planning p....... nd the eartoes at.,.•-at. calaai.o Smeov opal the existing federal, City dewlap.. 6C balances all other av,ilable laud ros les in """lly, the NPO rabulae mthly mating'arm o°the following data•: all cilli°.. may infly . the planning state and_Ileal ea.daeda. D S TRARSPO2IAT10N Lerm of the need,,.proceed by.chow reports, preen... gCOHOBY army HoveivE. San.--. public Paull iii°. nd NPO.1 - lot Wednesday.Tigard City Hell no Tl...yortatloo report —,Uw the __.t SscvIll,. Nvcarai Feature' ad Open Space, and NPO 02 - as..,dad Finally, the report -.:belt. vaei—a pollctea Tho ge-oqy report rovi•we the e•lsting traupeeta[i.a syst.ta within the Tigard a • Teaveportatlad. no Foliate. aad NPO I3 - 3rd::=:d•y T16ard City Hall �ad lmlem't-l" ,t &iae which will noalaic activity If the eommeel.1 and which Include. atrsae and aad. lmlitavtatian aroU,1e' deecrlDo iG proeue NPD da - 1st wedue.day,Ti6aed City Hall mi.L°iv nd imyresa the eclse!% eitiun Sed,etrial mss iv the Cit h, report aLo (twtYicwye); paDlie rra¢ep.rtaiin; which a•ti-a ss telthe need for efficient. involvomat Droroases, ,view varSove yolieims nd ped•atrin avtl Dieyele ways; aad caii.oade. orderly aad logical urD—lzntion within tG RPO 05 - 3rd WedGsday.Tigard City Hall ivmlemntation NPO D6 - 3rd Wed va•day,Signed City Rall NATOR FEATERNS AND OPEN SPACE aroimbia. that the City •Ewald G using to Tiger-ar. RPU D] - 2nd Yedve•day.Trinity Rvaag.11cal Chaecb milia!° and improve opo° the City', eco unit n-Te e..P.rtatton ropect and Plan`.view the •a. Camittu for GStiz-In'olv.mnt fL.L.i.) hie report hes !¢formation° or eaycte d•vrloyment, it U antleip'Ud GIIatn!Le ..Laid• the Iilled City Limit. n wall, he other mini.. elem.ta of the 3etl bloody.TigeN CICy Aall of natural reatvrom and rm s vmevrel anomic dovmZoymat eCndlos will Geom m to Sneluda 6 11 trayspor[atlon a reidora CDat eemprohen.ive Plan•e the ^Fi.tlivge, Policies h-rardn• Packs and roe wGion,n nvd <vliveal onto and addr•ued 1, evpar•e, vvb-ag°eat Leanne..the s.threat are, of the Retro a and Iml ce-,tioa Sttace6lu• d*=v wIlirh ALL RSETIRCS BEOIR AT 7:30 P.R. resole: Rniura1 fee--. .ad reeoat... roporU coca the Pr{mry Policy dircetlo. I. ••,. Yub!%ton County.°Beware.., P.—Z:; brifly...merit.. the intent of ane. re Der t. lneleda• vutat"o., wildlife, ant.g°te Cin'3 iced.c nd Tualatin. no plan also eoordldatas It. old*lita the policies end inplace.tati.n and epactal eros of cone.-within [xanvyorUtion Dinning .tr.rte rlLh atrategime of the¢i-e report.. Thi.docucant PaDlic EoecSbe are Gi% nage-°led to receive citlzov comate then Tigard are Natural,hazard, Zero to HODEIHO Washiagto° Con°t'. the RetroplUeav Sary ice le the Lramework of the Prop...d city-w{d. sing the pr The ,t Planning Plev Tigard Community [lootlyla inn nvd wtl'oda, emoff and eros Tao, Thi..e.... ...I— tG rent District ale the Ore Gwlopaaat Code. he ooxt P1•mi% Lomieeionrill be sup➢1] and gen ""-.'. -at of ComyraDea,icm plan. goal.- -tabillty, nd other Dtylc-ily limited damned of Tigard'.hn.i%mr)ac; tha L of Trale -.tion• _ Ih• final elamnt of the Parke and recreation Include.as Toil% h.-i ae prop.aed pin I. the ng: and id-4 t of v ted co d.Dl. Further, the pia° proposes wheel collector Cm:chavaiw plan Rap. Thi- i- .rmDh It carke,at ' Dart ,taadnrde add {art syst-m rosid•vG{al land nvd Ileo3aeted tlem,6e on vtromta should be mtrueted U eomleU a raDras•ntaLi.n of the various land 9HLe1me8 ], 1982 - ):30 P.R. - PDYL86 J9RI0H RICE SCAOOL ]asalf icaLi.ns. Cvltaeai r•• lee laelnde EoneIn a. the Tilled a nity continues to .ore, mfricil— coal con_=o iraa reatio, deo lgnetio¢e proposed for the Tigard area (sae n Eiatorical aicee end •conic .roes, hs grow daring the planning Period (1980-2000). reDort'a a dix lnelnd, mel a system Sa the Ti.ard ro nl oL U• cap on res side). Additional Eearinge will G eeEeduled'aa needed. - PDeo gci[Se daea It adtlroa.a. the aaaDllsIled a e. arse c°1Lctio. .for an h Ludy -coca nonni.ed- rest lntial as and the consideration o! - - above. Finally, rmFort -uSSssts PoleUe ISgard _b- Eng• -1u--addition. the --at or e —...led yoliciec end imlemntetin - -- - - ,Grate-me or. -Treece- Lowrla LIl, •tf CGcited.bow• t thend lmplameneniSon raeagies to -imt sv,beety acioua polio Tee nd iv@1.mnGtiea FOR ADDlIIONAL IYFOYMATION, PLBL98 CONTACT iHH Poc additional in[ocmatton e.ncernl% .—Public ill E.DD.c•,- ov d.. deval.yment way [romnyIIyv ieally limited .s 'trat,glavv vhieII weld m° ro a varier of M. ci14 OP TILAED•E DRP'STRENT OF PLAWIRG ARD pcellmimry Ca¢mreIIenelvo Plan or ISSard of Planning De and bevel Code. y DEpB)aP)IENT AT 639-4171. Dlaaea call oe visit no Iisard !Ia eeneltly a ae, and diwroity ad vpdaU LG Dovelng [Jyea to meet Then need. of TSEard'. The enerEy report e•vi•w U. alter,itiva D-rtm.vt of PlaaaivE nd Gvsiopmvt. City'°Palk nand Path w.....tam•. ruidents, snarl the Protection oL 12755 S.Y.Aah,mea°•,Tigard,Oregon 9]223.639-41]1. ewrgy aenre.m avnilahlo to .aiGnU of COPIHS OF BACA PBOPOSSD CD)@RHI)bNSI9t PLAN 4 3 LIBEARf. REPORT dR8 AVAILABLE 111 THE TICARD PUBLIC COMMUNITYRACKGROUND SUMMARY OF PROPOSED L dSTICLe Z-ADHIIRST86IIOM 2n° City of Tigard prat—sly Gs saw. A1LDougE zoning agjoye wide •ceptaace, it Eu develop regal,t{o.s and erSteeia which aortae ° hs erection of optional aacDeek ataoda.ds ...totarily Incident- to priory .... in a 4ndivld—I plan'`bleb av- c IES° article S"atifla the act..elbilitin articvlata tEo Politico of the eonproGnsiw Loi ain6la family raeidanetel areae. d"etriet, boom davmloycanta my 6e SvclWa eomproh,¢.iw ro➢rosnt boon a rely crf tic Tied in meant Jenee era o1 the City Couaeil nd its variola officers plm, and t° [or-1•U ereni iva aed eery Eara.•e, anode, ate. -my the .oven Neighborhood Plana"% Org—L.. Del% Snfl.xlbl., end in may ones, .—at.. end ng...I..• a¢d uUDiiahem the D....do—. ries iDle etndate. rIIieh-e o e he oration . octan Bury es idevt ill (8P0). Thin lock of a ,°tiled city-wida laud prodact"vs to the de+eloym,at iadolery.e wail for public honrings odd ronin`Droeeduws That usage I=...tic, era carie f.r mltir le nPolici roevidanWenlai Dr ini... to .11. a "ad at.. °planning effort he-often caused eoata'I.. •. the eomuniey at lards. These er"tiriem 4,deli,,and development: nc D unit, Cor ,,:, kale mond for the d-v.3oWsnt i,dnstry and Las City's or soviv6 atom primarily from the -act aha one-..ired for all types of lead d.....—at eery rotnl) ad aft"les ip yropo.ala. Pru•ntly there ate in....iC i. be—.¢ delta Gen-maker•. city staff's the to the form and ..°tont °t today's zoaimg alma Ivduvtrtnl Districts has°Deen Tolled°-. admini'Ur tIl- tDa esivti% zeal% my. iG ComroGaniv, Roro .-eific etandnrda Par the altSnE of pier. ban also Dela affected. oedlnnc.s have eDn6a6 little from thew is his article es tabli•Ge etmdard ter taking plan Rep an-ezivti%land a =raeterod/mbixe hems¢. The andaede far off-,trace ynking In late 1981 the City Co...il directed the the 1920'.. cartel. types of deei•foay. which aro Follow! LDo roviaw led sse. regvir,caold-to Ilene hem.<las.ified.e oeding to the Caaadttw fol CiGitov Involeom.vt nal. cry to ensure'v.itormitp em.' ea,eie Leoey % approval of a connary o TEm a cation of a Control e,sicase nisCri�[ the ono Typs .inion {n -lie cIT. ha (C.C.I.) •ad -tafr to draft a city-vide Plan 1, addition to zea"°,• envy of the creat withtheyropoaed Comrah...I,. Plan, -1. Comroh...I,. Plan Rep chngoa• aad the (ORD),which recognize, the erre oparifiod pnrtinb apace° iced roc that would m{tlg,"Ghee oIt ti,g problem. e.bdilia ten 11911,tiom . o,td,t,d and do Zir...dty 1,-r•Qbiced by State LOEi•ia tion adopt!°. of the Comuatty Do-1,pm,t Cede. I. the adopted Tigard Urban Hvsir.11—t{o¢ Ened3o of c.9n not comply with may err Stain and Cnaty and-court deei-iovs and m e iauwr ,tly Dy which "vein- rhe-.. to the ousting znlng Aeoa Pzan. Thin dlotr{ct will nil.for a ycaat are -Smiler to[hone stated iv the The DealSmimry draft of the city-wide regv{rem°t•. the SL6n 8ebulati... Evan the °e.d to dmm.t.." thc—to .—airmnt (Diatr"ct) my. those in<on'iaSooe les in be eriaiy a! rcial, office• E{bII esleting Zm iv. Ordinance. OtD•r aravdaede colull Dev-iv, plan a°eine or .levan already been nevi.md and wee adopted by the to -th. lmplemeItalian of the cmm.ity-, rectified. i.e.Sthe ..a p-emitted n the MOactiel °see either .-..at- or as include crone our arUCSal and collector alscavta. All or then element. abrv3d G City Co.an it on October 25, 1982. dawlopm,nt DOZici•s st.te,I !n the '—posed DUtrlel R¢P win collect,Those P"'dtted on mixed no... air°mtm, vision 11-111ce a end re IrI4 evi.red • whole rather than "Pleat. .*� _ Comprah..I—Plan. tIIo Compraha,eLca Pia°Nap, it viii voi logger o Aora vpeeifle dsvalop^-`YL ,;pard. for provisions all.for the u .sof S.pyica°ntal be veto°cry to first cheek the Comrobnniw comae ep.... lddivid,al u elamnta. The slevm .looms !a P.it of ebo-nompeeE_e,l+e Planning prng aa. The b...fit, from the Cynic Dave10 —1.1 and Ladu•trie d•..I��ae'• (-I to 252 of parkin.). are: Nin• (9) C.yroEem ins Pisa RaDeem G Ciry of IiEard Dn. ,omitted ic,alt Go l m-ve. Plan EmpnLor zoning map lveom ist,peie•Gtoee ram° required eddrea.I- [3) Citizen Zneolvment. (2) ,vie. iia yresaat land davelopmmnt Cod. '111 lmeoes ndm4aiatritin and eoviawlng • dewloymenC Deoposal. a All Plnon.d Develepmata wail De ..warn.- LaadseeDi% and Screening r.quiramnt. Natural Featvru aad 5 w ..di—tion . wall a ettizea end devaloyer p Ogen Daro, (3) Air• raEularions. The preliminary 21Eerd Caomnity Additionally. DoiIl'the CeapreGmi,e Plan H•y Dp mdarlyi% di,teiete with aspect to pr,-eriGs eta.dertls for raoni% and Yater a.d La,d RasI...Z 1St ,.) Sc.. and Odi.sn and nw or lend ... p re•sgvtml rofloet Parnitta0 vsos Dut rill all. or lavdeca ins. nde d. toe a.tree l: Grana Due D. oq. DovelaDmnt Coda will ivciade zoviv6. `.veva and Ointeiet Rm will m d p y (5) Houv!%• f6) Public ran Ii Giem and robulatiom. 8¢C man oro lmp.rGncly, iDe •g"a Li 1•ae ns [Lara,, aad I.reaidaati•1 aiatiov Lcon• pr,-'iniad suDdivi.ien and aha aarip cruised aid. n - % e pa syee4tication (:e iwad for now d.wl.Pavat.) bels Dee. ISr+!<•-, (]) Irnnmpectaclen, (e) Eno aolidation of alt e°gvlatory proceducee Bron, rw .e.ulat{°m. c .:!,ting dam lCios. t..d.C4:lv the nedmriylng diatr{ct. iveorp.reted. Haight and vetD.ck eee¢dard, Cneervatl o,, and (9) Orbaniz-lion; a related to land d...I plant will easy• the [or role.., well°. end hod 1,all die let. Th. Propoue soning d;etrict 'a^spitientioo ° 324 Comunitp i)evalopmvt Cod, proDoves a sae ImplmvIt-till Strati efficient 4nplom.tatin or rhe De-Cla-a tieotiev oyyoee have Dee. elemrlT identified I. one FSvdlvgs. Policies aad he by tormlatiod and review or the C—cahecalve Pla,. .,atom ba, Dm•v devolo Dad U provide for the system n• d to Ch. haysbeaction. ♦ tree cutting lotion Der mine an,,, n rbieD f• dir•etly coerelsted to the Comprwbavvivil Piav and Coneau ity Demelame- a lRRmdi•Lm recognition of rovie f saes exSatin, cooibooi-Ii.t• etr¢eture. 120 aD.u•vin ""'ta; and • C—r.b...I— Ple. Code win ill • cons id.%bi. amoant or he valine• etas°•of land devolo c maxi G me � . boon [alluded wbleb would limit —developed poo° the try. oZ standards applied - the sUteici Wryo.o o[ tDi. aha%- is to cineol[y u in thio Ua cityLrn Glomi clear cut. Pvtur• Levd gee Hep rhieII indScaGe the Pl.mi% Commienioo aad City Ceu.cil Saw1 reciawad —d regulated e n v.lfied erou-' and avera6e dneitiee pernitted Ln the Seto a ltaited nambet of u.. type, on the 1C°6O % proposed land vs for the Titled Urban Savolveeevt. The Compran...i. Plan and rather they o ,rims a[n di•j,ia locisio, dietrlet. Por •x•myl•, the dosis%tin Y-3.5 Deals °f c.®o ran I. . pred.- or Sta¢dardi for the div{-1°° of land haem been Planning Area(See mp In`...ran aid.). Co®vlty Da—loye°vt Code, n prepared• will pointe if LDa n land n,, polleim of the indicate. filet that the dintr'_et snow c tibillty ennrae-r!.[Ses, LDer*by rn.nE•d to Drip, the City codas and andnbtedly require r—I.iom during the Dr°yo,ad Comeebeuiw Plan aro to be aid..ri.1 us. ad that the a eesge LII Dr idSng a Davi• for the rognla[!% of rogvirwvts 1¢ eoafornanee with Stell The city or Iig,M Dr,.e.tly ragui,Us ind Lacing process. Additl°.ally, m•ndmne. impl•°eated. The 'troetue• and forint of the L.the di-te"°t 4e 3.5 dwlli%units per a t 1v -anecdote,with criteria which are .L d.rds. dovolop.ont nvd the uee of land by a ennoble s will inevitably be DroPo—d following adoption Propmed Co�tulty D°wlopme,G Cod° viii oro di t17 related L°Public intorea L. cathode i.elvdi%Zoning. Sab0lvi.ioa led Si.n as tDa 'cad Lor ravisiooe eM addition, ere [eellf Ute ter° iglemntatiov at oro Io Arelele IT of iG Proposed Co�FvLcy' no Street Clao'lfieatin' Wetton deiin.e the ora"oar..; the -Lldt% Code; aad City d.teevSvad aad avalleDle ro s Perait. It -IPbleticat•d ad eomlex dewl.Wr¢t Dev.Iopmant Cod.•. .all...I oving AETICLH Ill-DBpELOPHRNT STANDAI= four s eat .1...Ifl—cl°as I.Tibnd aad tG yol icioa In Che as n RmisDDoc]ood PZe—ingvary at chi- till.•h°wes°r. to revi.m Itandards. Dnl..a ih. rob,lac°ry aye coon regu3aGiovs he bean IF "d to tn'— erticim IIx Includm retailing .ca°d.rd, each 'ta°d.rd. for ...h c1...Lfir.tio,. The roar Org-nixacSn yla—.ver 12..0 noel.., mcned- thou ennporlios or •gin ins =eEvlatiovs Snevcn a sweater d.groo of eo.clm Sty to cE. !n the Ciey chat er aaablUhed ...as. ., err-Stroa PartSnE era L..di.g nLu1Llc.clam induda: Arterials (alt scam es6uLU Lhe Gyps o[dw.leW.pC (residential. (including `Ila zoa{vg nup3 to being tam into lead m• deeUla. mkivy pcoc.sa, Lne Aowvsr. CGre ren cmrtaia SleslDle Ni.bwey.), Haj. Collector. (Yal,vt St.. reiai and intlustrial, ate.) and the lat"om chat weld G Te9uiremntn, Laveecspi% •ere S.rwni.s n°®• eampl Sa¢eo rltD CIIa CovproEonaiv Pln, or t° iml,man[•Liea o! the Co'proDev.ivo Plaa '111 rogv prniesSDL li provision•, eeeansoryDevlopm.t 8e6uLtto,s, 121,L.• .tc,), dRiaoc Coll•ctocalrn (Pounce, v o! demi[ of d•valo o unc retain eellari•ars cat. Sattler, ate.) e¢d local Strmees. y poop[ (single eodlfJ Cmpreh°a•!v° Plan d°s"gmtionn vh,ra ba a ertaiv pear.... Lad Divia in. Standard.. Stern Orel— tulip.mltiDlm farmlT. ate.) [Eat t•allowed needed. in o der to obtain a.kOcel•dgmnt of ARTICLE IT-D89H)gP1SERI DISTRICTS -Joe Cb•%•e Pc°+i-1on°, Street Clanei[S.at l°.•• Strut nd Street old Otiliel 0ev.loymnt 3Uadartl. and I, lead within the ClLJ aad CEe iigaetl EeDad the Comllbll -. Pr r by the Land utility- D.--,poem 'KJ�'�.aderdi'• aad Sign O{• Ple—i- --..(See —P) Toning Ord{.adros, Conuevatlon nd`D...I'Poon Com1•slon(LCDC). no formmlatiov and adoption of a lead vu Yh11a men or Lbo yroyoted CminlGy RognLtI" "y Z ,ram -t..d,rde vud by the City for the 1M.1"I cane o[ ragulecia, lead a Zdallaten De,.l. G Coda is similar to the existing 'teeeG, ower and utf lltp sldwe3L, etc. ars ban° been lead D I...1 °:.lea ,xi,is Gra [eon Uo fern �O° Ar-.:..y De..1. braphieelly portrayed. 1 iowrmenU toe nor a,e eovtavt [ tE.o lstlng traditional sy.tm Zoning Ordinnro, sen rel ouDetantivo ebevge' Went Y.gulatloa• it. -Sxt,year. "a thin eouairp and e.me-62 !. Se act an •uy ea'k. no challenge I. Co IIave b...ode. These eban.0 Include: dw.lopvrate which or nec.esary and Th vwly adoPUd Sig- Rsgulati.ns will be Ti._ rb., Wp31e ,°Liu bas Gen paid for Ue"lowlyed into the Ce_u.{Ly Dew3oDmvL ere City of Ttgaad. Cod°when it Se adopted. ^III'I)I III III AIp 1111IIPppII PIIPIIIIIq)I)P�I III117IIPI111IIPIIII IIP�111II I IIID PII II PiI IIII UIrVII II II pIU III 1114111 PIq IIID IIP II nIq 11111,I N)TE: tF TH)S w) F.DO I 2 3 4 5 6 7 18 9 f0 II 12 y, VL AV DRaYiw 15 I Ss CL AR THu( TMs ma NOTIM,)T is ole TO 1 THL WALITT OF TIP ORIGINAL OE 6Z 82 12 92 92 P2 a ZZ 12 OIZ 6I BI L1 91 SI bbl EI ZI 11 0! -6 9 1 9 S b II ,nl6udi nllun6udwJuuluulnuLmhnllnu6u141uI9NIHubp)ILI„VIOIIIpIIIIIWDIIIIII)IIIIILIII))III)9I11UIIIIIIUNIlUlI1llllWilIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�WIIIIWIWAIWUllWI10lelllnuLWllnduulnu�ulnlJnnllndl nil dAD�mIH11Iuu6w -- - ------- - - - MARCH 7 91990 4' C� March 10, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTA SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP: DEVELOPMENT STANDARD AREAS The attached map entitled Comprehensive Plan Map: Development Standard Areas indicates those residential areas within the Tigard Urban Planning Area that have established developments and those areas that have not yet been developed in a particular way. A Brief History The concept of establishing versus developing areas was brought up at numerous NPO and CCI meetings : ecause of a need to protect the status quo of existing developed areas. Status quo, means existing type of residential structures eg. , single family detached, single family attached, multiple family, etc. and the standards used to develop those areas. It was a concern of these citizen involvement groups that incompatible infill within built-up residential areas would drastically change the character of an area. Process After some research, staff found that other communities in the state with similar concerns distinguished between those areas that are established and those areas that are yet to be developed. By indicating these areas on an adopted map, certain protections are given to established areas and certain flexibilities are given to developing areas. For example, the vacant areas within an established R-7 area will develop in a similar manner to existing R-7 developments regarding setback, height, lot size and type of structure. While the standards for an R-7 developing area will be more flexible allowing for different types of designs. In addition, those developing areas that directly adjacent to an establishing area and designated for more intensive residential uses eg. , A-12, will be rea»-;-pd to limit the density within 100 feet from the established areas. n 3 w'_11 insure more compatible residential types, eg. , duplex, between , ingle family detached areas and multiple family areas. Council should refer t7lie adopted Comprehensive Plan policies in Sections 6.3, 6.4, and 6.6 of the Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies document for more clarification of this concept. r Council Action The development Standard Areas map will be reviewed by Council after the Interim Zoning Map has been completely reviewed and adopted. The Development Standard Areas map was thoroughly reviewed by the NPO's, the CCI and the Planning Commission. The map attached is the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Council. Pm (0051P) R Nn AR 10 1 E,3 CITY OF TIGARD PANNING DEPT. March 10 , 1983 THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TIGARD P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Western International Properties , the developer of the Tech Center Business Park, would like to take �hosedpfortitstY o address the specific zone designations p"yP property on SW 72nd Avenue and SW Tech Center Drive in Tigard. The proposed zone change for the eastern portion of the property from M-4 , Industrial Park, to M-3, Light Industrial, appears inconsistent with the planned use and intent of the Tech Center Business Park. Western International Properties has recorded Covenants, Conditions and Reriothan too e1imposedpose aby the greater constraints on the property r ect zoning ordinance. Prior to construction of the l3 acnt property o ert in 1980 , discussions were heldproposed uses andwith etolassureethat he y owners to outline the p P architectural setbacks and screening would be compatible with the neighboring properties . One of the uses discussed was office space, which provides a more aesthetic buffer between the residential use and adjacent light industriagnated l. As the eastern portion of the property was it was felt that office use would better serve the interest of the residents to the north and the industrial uses to the south. The present proposal changing this property to an M-3 zone does not provide for the office uses which we think are more com- ntrnat patible with the adjoining residential uses. Werteectlonethisional Properties has commenced review assetftontheoffice area the City of site which would be a greater The Tigard, than a strictly light industrialJuse. Van attLomached point description of the project, prepared out the advantages this type of development offers. 1805 Northwest Ghsan Street port tancl.Orecx)n 97709 503?417498 Western ir,Ssmaticns!p,opo,ties r dao S— ids�i�®MOWMMOERM—NOWMW s €� The City of Tigard City Council Page Two Some other points to consider in regard to the zoning are as follows : The existing use on Lot 1 of Tech Center Business Park conforms to the M-4 "Permitted Uses" . The property abutting Tech Center Business Park to the west is designated as remaining M-4 . Retaining the M-4 zone on Tech Center Business Park would result in a more restrictive zone abutting the residential area. We feel this is a more desirable goal than having an M-3 zone in this location. The Council is herewith requested to consider retaining the M-4 zone for Tech Center Business Park. Respectfully submitted, WESTERN INTERNAT NAL PROPERTIES P.obert E. Williams, 3r. • REW/jk Enclosures i an®oa�rarra®saw®®��®era® i Architects Van Lom AIA 34 N.W. First St. Suite 309 Portland. OR 97209 503/226-0590 IE RT% r/ MAR 10 1983 CITY OF TIGARD March lo, 1983 PLANNING DEPT. 4 ttxj t j1d yry Cp-� T r 5, tq'i r .r,Y 2r'i ,y,pd t r r f rY f )fir f!? ��y�'y7r, :7,, .fs �r l >f�t �4i5e+ r7 may. 7 r� }i�,�ee `:'�I:��` f �„Ay� 1,. f t. :t .) )'�. 1 !, ? f 19r••��3 {•. Y :f �Si r b 1 .Y �r'µ•� , r s f .girt ! t fr f e, `ro .` ��,' ''"' ,,.: 'f r�A �c3arG7,, ,� jy .r k'�2aJ��}t ., f t „t ljh�crfF ., .4 +}t 3•' ,y�,.•{��YY. �.:�9�{.rt�_y�t�.,,fii '.r.. � .fn �:i t + 'n 9-. '� `r r S rr i ; t r fiieIIur r Or;• arQat*. OunCil + i Ni 1.tii r )t f _-r(."4 'P•ii{ter fIb`• ...?�,i'b. 5 7,' Sit al. , (cgs �1��bri;4 .!t.i7ty�,y �,t..a,<.ttf yP "!'�.i r• •,.;�}tt s }t`j'�:^� .ec Rh w, t imp L 'Y. •ea1YF -:4�: d .air:, �` -.si taco .:J:f!?, 'tr` Y,y ..,:r -;.r .a$.y, V �_. �'� 7Ligh� �d•.xs .a'3.KSae � , 3 :sY• +y ,.. rM ,r=.; ,.r 5s-e_.-ik r �"; ..s,� t i t,�� n�r,*�U J•1C aF ? .F a _ ��, • i +02i" oe5 � cs ` e saa 4,'d.©T3e"di�eseysa " �y , 1� k t,'ry6-•� s �j�rM��{ =t Kyr tytxf}y'� yy .3 vgsrs � + r pycf P .tr+`1' `Y�J�}� 1f xC �f »'"S,j S ! 1 �i -7Y n.•4F�4 a a #.. f 'f 3 ij'# `Jr t r[11 }r' '�f•" t S' ar: .b dn'tir ° xnc, ecypl.' ie,3� ' sa� eve `exe �� r-ef�ce zk �� 1 r r rt+3 i� 5 Y j;; e? �. 47 M rs ,rt-n s b( r {ge t : cSfgicleip � �- .♦, �,se�,'n,�sarls$`n � ,>�er8�"c��velopme�3,'t�ii3Y¢�Ae� `�t� .�F.�a"i�r y�:y":'�•n,� ' �;.rtt ;., ,>, rto1MK �. ''<. t K*,[p:a4��,,r t•t� " yzrt , .y:, } >.- t-<y�%7rbr- ir,y`d,� ` r t+ i' vc i h ♦ ��}se'>, � 8yt�•en4�X�a e � � 011gAY�F'`ar�RT.Pr at'rtZ"t.�ap�lne8}��'J�L`t�en7x y��,"�'i f r j n r } w;k+ .,F.S>i.{ ti .ri`0 V :.ir �n .. lall�. $ 1✓iN.t,` 1 k�;1'F P9- t.y`. ,_t �` � s 9� t � t ti> ,ta oto the, t3' a ans c'tenslsjarxcaunding. the ow�ae r s psesenfi , «t'�ryy it yf�'}..1 - :� M1 ,,,a ,+.,. �i. wi -e� c, } � " �p %le y- •�'4 ?t-' s kn t +., �1f k '> 4 .?�. i ° , - L•. t �i ra.- r 3�+E��7�y,x_kr„ Irr �'<y.�.} xtrj7-K c '.t o } ,� . �' .i t.t••i �) P i� !.-r� ,sr.z it Ftp � ��q.b$ t� s p,R �C f n{�`' � • n •�y'(��5� ��'�'�#5�'4}`y ��`ti ^�r tt.o�..��hr.v,x'S �i�fia' if'�,[�'k'��,,�;�,1�'�'f'-�70 .S 4- 5titi. :h sure a.. s t .s j y ��_ �,.^, .. a�r5'3/"' � ."S 'i� e •s e rty. t r a'*1 T (: r •'M A3{ rF�!$fk 1r( �! y :, ;} 'eaa� capon pYannede-,�tl'hers` tea�s sass g i r �{ '�� .a'Y` rr vl:.._ <f.'.i)" a te(;,,,., . . A. •c ? t i3'_.y, .�: +r a '`: the ,pubs :end'-eve e�efore �t' otalci.lbe?+es5 { � ' vr♦� y:�lt � xsr•-..� v...•c'..i- »_y _ tf.�•� k,••r,f7ge'c,� -•�:?.�v 4roY ff- nt: rf .i_i i w'r`=1''l'C �a�'.y�(�t} �e r �� r�aA�� .�.Y r� 'e.� �e.. �2"•` f ':.: !1v S �- }°�',�.r ., �y .Z�• -�.y ,+,�g:f, � .o ;: t, nom.) �a x,�., .ms's js.�. . 9;� .�aatc2., •adr�.£°tio t r LLaj,�a=es '�' STi t� '• L�.`'t b tJ ' a '1.. e1 tit 'F' �'4�,� ' t,�" ,� tg7n`iay � �an,�acces��, or'��q`rc�' e � e's�"�, ��, ��r�• ,: t4. .h t +is ff tr. iayellenFesi'�e+�� aCr2s� 2{E �a �� 1t�sr tt ,x ZS ys �`1"i goodghwa y PP P C;3 t 3 ocation "an •a rok date 'southern a•i �' f a exposure p t We ask,_,therefore, '-that this `site be.. redesignated as M-4 "Industrial Park` Zorie" in the revised City of Tigard^.Comprehensive Design Plan so that this project may continue. Yours very truly, ARCHI CTS VAN LO I Joseph. M. .Van Lom, A.I.A." u Architect` ` s $I1ClOsureS } ~� JMVL vi S�',$�t. lht. ,t t tt l_+ i x.;� Vt;7 tr , -rrS�s �f'�' :. + S l i,��',f1.�.J`15�T`�/1t�lr�f �2•t�pi>., . iY .Tt 4.�•�. t);".rpt!J .t••Sirb^Y.//qp ryyhF�JJ,.+:�' K '{ y hi��?(r, k F1r,I:f ht y Y,'r M: M1 1 r J ^lrr FI ��I•.. fy }},�••1 A ;.r ; f r r .1 n♦' ,j r�. q {t 'i 's '1.' r" '��,Fn��,,:�•tY •��`r k ;S F i .. t r , 7 r �-mak r`f�''� [ 1 �1.- l #t ��t`+� S �' Sf?, r r t i r .. 'u;J::.ct •J .y. e r ( ;'� •f�a t 6�j)�?�� . �-�- mom mA CITY�0F`.TiNRD I Z .mor ` + Rl NNING DEPT. W D 04 v� Jn Ul 0 ~ �. G". �� 1� d• ��o ice• �-a oss •® `�.' b i 1. C� r�u �� c :I Illi —.---�— �• !�'� 4 _ j ' ZI \root ` J 14 f9 o ffi Z i e, ` CIO f — 1/ �► `� � �—i;Af®ate SLW 4!h AV i Z� 1 1? i� rte.,' j�� ./ D , � � ,s�• �moi, •!/� -� • v 0 as �s } g �4 f� .- , v •® 'a l�;� go- i oz •i _} _ •s t ' .ry bot 7-i Io lb1p S _ s - 6� y - Ap \ t\� b• _ .44 11 1 1 -� •1 d� . i e'DN i� t i IP 1 �1 a* •tel• � L 1 i A N o r s�� 's+n ..• r r s a �i R pYs s e (7 _ ! 96 Dev � ® r �� a • 0 �d - t pyo � a „°r® r s• 2Y.F p � is �� oa � \ l6®� � a / �C� N • obi L h F. �% QE bit- co ` r/ $ . w / Fit ow G • ti ;g� cn o `" � t � • i OC g • a v r _ l i �l t CB # N �9�L •ate T r -♦ y�� L Z t49 A • % ��T v � it cl f h AV Z •� , It ' ��, � is a=o e� �� 1� Q� ...� -l1�. •.F �,i t e• ® moo t� Oti �� lA � � � s � r s •� • fid. ' a d - \ S iip .� i•• All, A'c- n` �y,K'r i �. 'F � :mow. s� ..�1. ,,�� ! 3 ® �,; -�•s ordoT S'1"� It- w ,�.- March 10, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: FROM: PLANNING STAFF,? TAFF,ff 4 SUBJECT: ZCA's For several months now, the staff has scheduled and Council has continued Zone Change Annexation hearings for the following areas : Durham Island Bechtold North Dakota Randall Cooper Benny Larson If the Interim Zone Change Map is adopted prior to March 18, 1983, these zone changes will be approved as a part of that adoption. If the interim Zone Change Map is not adopted prior to March 18, 1983, these zone changes will have to go back through the zone change process which requires a hearing before the Planning Commission. Staff urges Council to adopt the Interim Zoning Map prior to March 18, 1983. Pm (0051P) i s 3 r R t i k t k FOR CITY OF TIGARD RECORD AND CPA HEARING 15-82 MARCH 14, 1983 pictures of WB, Inc. Property and leased to Landmark Ford, Inc. Also Tax Lot 4800 map is 1 36 DD not leased to Landmark Ford 35 Fs®ts�®® PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL 2/28/83 PROGRAM BUDGET Community Services 1.1 Police 11.637.87 1.2 Finance & Records 4..058.49 1.3 Municipal Court 368.37 1.4 Library 3.073.23 1.5 Social Services Total Community Services 19.137.96 Community Development 2.1 Public Works 22.789.82 2.2 Planning & Development 2.246.45 Total Community Development 25.036.27 Policy & Administration 3.1 Mayor & Council 528.43 3.2 Administration 929.28 Total Policy & Administration 1.457.71 City Wide Support Functions 4.1 Non-departmental 20.209.84 Misc. Accounts (refunds & payroll deductions, etc.) 6.226.40 Investment DEBT SERVICE 5. Bancroft Bond & LID Expenses 52.276.21 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY Contract TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS WRITTEN 124._344.39 . f TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Frank Currie, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: 72nd Avenue Right-of-Way Relinquishment Attached for your review is the correspondence relating to acceptance of relinquished right-of-way from the State of Oregon on the 72nd Avenue LID project. It is my recommendation that approval be given. a s�cs� DE HAAS & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS SUITE 445-ACC CENTER WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070 9450 S.W. COMMERCE CIRCLE (503) 682-2450 February 16, 1983 RECEIVED FEB 2 991 1983 Mr. Frank A. Currie, P.E. CITY OF TI Di rector of Public Works R® City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Frank: After traveling full circuit, we are transmitting the right-of-way relinquishment from the State on the south end of the 72nd Avenue project. The attached correspondence from Jim Dixon is self-explanitory and fairly explains the State's position. It is my understanding that Washington County has notice of the State's position and concurs. Upon final reflection, it appears that all are looking out for Tigard's long-range interest along with that of the general public. It appears to me that the States final decision to relinquish 90 feet is well researched and responsible. r We have color coded the map to show in red that area which is being relinquished and in blue that area which will be declared surplus and offered for sale. The Relinquishment of Title should be recorded in the usual manner. 3 Sinccrely, �f MARLIN J,/DE HAAS, P.E . MJD/slc Attachments cc: Idents 53a and 54 t. 0 Department of Transportation HIGHWAY DIVISION ROW 12 VICTOR ATIVEM TRANSPORTATION BUILDING, SALEM, OREGON 97310 ppEl..pw 378-6502 In Reply Retar to F.1,No February 15, 1983 Mr. Marlin J. DeHaas, P.E. Suite 445 AGC Center 9450 SW Commerce Circle Wilsonville, OR 97070 File No. 46031 N. Tigard Int.-Hubbard Int. Pacific Highway Washington County Dear Mr. DeHaas: I am returning to you the original relinquishment of 90 feet of right of way from the State to the City of Tigard on 72nd Avenue. Your letter of December 7, 1982 requested, on the City's behalf, that we reduce the relinquishment to 60 feet and sell our holdings outside of the relinquishment. I fully never expected approval of retention of only 60 feet, but I did agree to circulate the request. Approval was received in mid-January and we have been waiting for a new description and the time to become available to process a revised document. Last week, while discussing nearby property v-ith the District Engineer, Sill Geibel, the subject of the relinquishment was mentioned. When I advised Bill that I was surprised we would agree to keeping only 60 feet of right of way in the publics' name, he was surpriged of the concurrence and pulled his records for review. Apparently, the map attached to the recirculated request delineated a width of 100 feet and the District Engineer's approval was based on that document. Mr. Geibel stated he could not agree to a reduc- tion of width to 60 feet. His concerns are based on projections of traffic type and volume. His rejection of the request would have killed it. Therefore, I have to assume that we do not have proper authority to surplus and sell the area outside of a 60 foot width. I realize that the major and controlling decision should perhaps come from the City of Tigard. However, we are employing our experience and expertise in recommending retention of 90 feet of right of way. With this letter I am also sending a copy of Ruth Keller's November 30, 1982 letter. Should the City agree, please complete the process outlined in Ruth's letter. Very truly yours, f JWD:cw James W. Dixon _ Attachments Property Supervisor ROW 12 1 Department of Transportation HIGHWAY DIVISION VICTOR ATI-,EH TRANSPORTATION BUILDING, SALEM. OREGON 97310 OG�L.KT November 30, 1982 In Reply awl..CO Fde No. Mr. Marlin J. DeHaas, P.E. File 46031 Suite 445 N. Tigard Inter.-Hubbard Inter. AGC Center Pacific Highway 9450 S. W. Commerce Circle Washington County WILSONVILLE OR 97070 #1-5-5 (23) Dear Mr. DeHaas: After talking with you, I found your July 6 letter on file and decided to send to you the original Relinquishment dated November 29, 1982 from the State to the City of Tigard. Please note that we have made a reference to the agreements with Washington County, Washington County Resolution and Order regarding County Road 2379, and the City of Tigard Ordinance No. 78-82 in the paragraph following the description. If an acceptance by the City is required, will you Please handle that and have the Relinquishment recorded in the records of Washington County. We will need the recording data to complete our file. Will you have someone advise us as soon as this data is available. A print is also enclosed showing the property being relinquished outlined in red. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Yours truly, Ruth Keller Documents Specialist RK:mp Enc. cc: Larry Rice, w/c relinq. & print Ken Rolfe, `� It Bill Geibel, Jim Dixon Highway Division File 46031 Misc. C 6 A 4347 1A-8-6, 9B-7-8 RELINQUISHMENT OF TITLE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the STATE OF OREGON, by and through its DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Highway Division, hereinafter called "State", hereby relinquishes and conveys unto the CITY OF TIGARD, Oregon, a municipal corporation, all of State's right, title, and interest in and to the following described property, only so long as used for public road purposes, to wit: A parcel of land lying in the E'-f of Section 13, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, W.M., Washington County, Oregon; the said parcel being that portion of that property designated as Parcel 2 and described in that deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission, recorded in Book 931, Page 497 of Washington County Book of Records lying Westerly of a line parallel with and 25 feet Easterly of the Westerly line of said Parcel 2. ALSO that portion of that property designated as Parcel 3 and described in said State of Oregon deed lying Easterly of a line parallel with and 25 feet Westerly of the Easterly line of said Parcel 3. ALSO that portion of the original 40 foot right of way of S.W. 72nd Ave. abutting that property designated as Parcels 2 and 3 and described in said State of Oregon Deed. This relinquishment is made and executed pursuant to ORS 271.330 and in v furtherance of that certain Agreement entered into by the State and Washington County, dated October 19, 1971 and supplemental agreement dated May 6, 1974; Washington County Resolution and Order No. 78-244 Washington County Road No. 2379 (T/J); and Citv of Tigard, Oregon, Ordinance No. 78-92. 1982. Dated this � day y of APPROVED AS TO STATE OF OREGON, by and through its L97r-AL SUF ICI NCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT N, L4 gh ay Divis sat.Attorney General Date B. oyd, Rig of Way Manager STATE OF OREGON, County of Marion 1982. Personally appeared J. B. Boyd, who being sworn, y Manager for the State of Oregon, Department of stated that he is the Right of Wa J Transportation, Highway Division, and that this document was voluntarily signed on behalf of the State of Oregon by authority delegated to him. Before me: NotaryPu lic for Oreg n My Commission expire /�� 11-24-82 dkfJ W \ Y- ,j•�f :+i y V i , Zo y e� fit ? rr C Qi '• i',. s r ,'� I K � _ tm�'r, TxE . +•c �� ,.y.. 'C r., f �s fi_p._J�' t'� r jr. a p� t,� ..r,•• 1 '+� jc. F / ..1.+- 'tom t t. a►. 9.• ,.y_h �.?�q. �r�3 �� }� 7�>`��I•.4{�~ t L•E � ,�••� ��,` 'f l �� _�,�.L�r �..i� d't: t ` s J i?�' ��e �� •s"i yit,� :�a '�yt rT�.d � f ��YID t'� i Y F, . z� i � L t'i ,A '` 3't .F r�•5,� '�•p1.t,:_.. •�Y ti � W�h n ', � - 11 }; h -rtry ' 4v' .,� x `. -444'T'• '�ri,��" �T �o Zr Mc }, -t y.e ':�Y '3 t Myt*�`..ig��' ��.rty ti� �: � � }t. +.(:.A •4�. t' �x:.�'G . Y -'�`? •. F" - ,. { ^. �ti ."• �- � 'i � ��'�+t �yy !� "",�•,"r1 yam?: .'N} C� u +�{�'. ♦ (� 1 : A ' 'F rs .T vt7oF F'�+Cp 5 c �•c Fid, �.• �{ art _ -. 'S�7 s .fr• YCa"� N.� �: F 1 t� 4�� Zr r t �>� 9T` x,F.['�• - {.. L^p �-+t' � ' .v �•ut+�,vf".^�� y. - March 10, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING STAFF QW SUBJECT: FORREST COWGILL STREET DEDICATION The dedication by Mr. Cowgill of 10' off of his property to the public along the north side of S.W. Tigard Street was required as a condition of approval on MLP 5-82 approved by the Planning Director on August 18, 1982. The Street Dedication document has been approved by the Engineering Superintendent, the City Attorney's Office and the Planning Commission President. Staff recommends that the City Council accept this document and authorize the City Recorder to sign. pm (0051P) t� $_ ®� FIN FILE FEF:PBNCL - TAX MAP: TAX LOT: STREET DEDICATT_C`7 By TF--SE PRESENTS, THAT Forrest L. Cowaill , Trustee of the Fiances Cowgill Trust , �F_ ina_`ter called grantor�8 , for the su-.t of $1.00 constituting the actual consideration for this de_d, do hereby give , grant and dedicate to the Public, its successors and assigns, a oe-pPt !al ri--ht-Of-way and easement for street, road and utility purposes On, Ver, across, un,2er, along and within the following described real premises in Washington Cou:rity, Oregon SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" To Sane and -o Hold the above described and dedicated rights u.-ito the Public for the uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantor�s-)- he�bv covenants that he ftkey} a-� the ownerfa)- in fee simple and have a good and ie.al right to grant his rights above described. 1N WITNESS 1.,1HEREOF, the grantorks} h-�s� hereunto set his -(their3-handfs� a-rid sea3.fs)r this 3 —73Y day of ;�'z. .4, 19�_�- (SEAL,) (SEAL) - (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAT,) (SEAL) STATE OF OP.yGON ) SS. County of On this 73• day ofC ��6 RkA a4 t- personally appeared the above named cM1, f�� 4t 6 / O F p n� FA4fNj►�.�J e/i.stj a!/i and acknowledged the Foregoing instrument to be t4wrirr voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public or Oregon Y2-Aly Commission expire : 12-0 Ze_5 l ltL•'L•'L•:lt1:NC;li I•'1 Ll: tl ACCEPTANCE Aooroved as to legal description this day of �T _ � f BY. — ----- 4 ty of Tigard Approved as to form this day of /21-6,,s,/-t_ l9q 3- a. �e - y ofTigard _. Approved this Z Z-�-day of • 9 _- BY: n . irperso - `ty o Tigard, Oregon Planning Commission Accepted by the .City Council this day of 19 BY: City Recorder - City of Tigard STATE OF OREGON )SS. COLL-tty of ) Onhis day of 19_, before me appeared . and both to me personally known who, being duly sworn, did say that he, the said is the Mayor, anZ he, the said is the Recorder of the CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal Corporation, and the said and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipal corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, this the day and year in this my certificate ! first written_ Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires l lig t, I -- Q�OFESgiONAL LAND SFR V rcFS JOHNNIE M. SUMMERS P.L.S.. INC ' •�" 323 S.E. 3rd Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 (503)645-2019 February 16, 1982 r Legal Description for Forrest C owgill For Street Dedication to City of Tigard The Southerly 30.0 feet of a tract of land as described in Book 200 Page 600 Washington County, Oregon Deed Records and more particularly described as follows: E Beginning at an 1"X 1" piece of steel at the Southwest Corner of said tract of land as described in Book 200 Page 600 said corner bears 1443.4 feet West and 946.1 feet South of the Southwest Croner of the David C. Graham D.L.C. No. 52 on the forth Line of John L. Hicklin D.L.C. No. 54 in Section 34, `21S, RIM, W.M. , Washington County, Oregon and running thence N 1024'15" E along the West Line of said tract of land as described in Book 200- Page 600 30.00 feet to an Iron Rod, thence S 88*23' E 1034.50 feet to an Iron. Rod on the East Line of said tract of land, thence S 1°21150" W along the said East Line 30.00 feet to the Southeast Corner thereof, thence N 88*23' W along the South Line of said tract of land 1034.52 feet to the point of �} beginnI g. { ContainnIng 0.713 Acres more or less. aEGIS : ' 0 PROFESSIOA.AL Na SURV YOR OREG0N AUUUST ti. 2995 JOHNNIE M. SUMMERS 1042 r Lit Y �v Z or/oe p � oh 3Z�� ,8Z 'iZ7 - ,is•/iZ M..OS' /Z o/OS - ^ � QZ �OQ'v .Q. ��• o 0 0 -o , .�s•�c/ Rtc g• I z 6. 9��• ,s•s/ � "o t H11,/ON 44 41 InN � Cyt I V H T ~ F Y Q' aS , J � F o h ,00'09/ OIto In } 3 3' Zz � n �� `� U � �•�� NO Nt9 lO y z2 . t ro to CY /`f,s/,0 S • N j0�� N prxa �I a.a � cnOve e O H < �k�V)� = v ® a ��R�U o 0\� U) i v pJu1vW ILL a Q� cr CO kCvl y �OIq =10 O q ` W CZ cry In tU I I q: co � 41v1 ��O tj tntj ci W tx © z OJ OS r Z --- ,94 /O.v _I os or ram u well 11 M MEMORANDUM March 1, 1983 TO: City Administrator/City Council FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: OLCC License Application RE: GAFFER'S - Class A License 206 and 207 Tigard Plaza, Tigard, Oregon 97223 New Owners: #1. JOHNSON, Ralph F. III 9975 S.W. Maplecrest Ct. , Beaverton, Or. 97005 #2. JOHNSON, Richard S. 6855 S.W. Raliegwood Way, #9, Portland, Or. 97225 Sir: The above named business is under new ownership, and are requesting a Class A license as was authorized under the former owners. f f It is recommended that this application be approved and forwarded to O.L.C.C. Respectfully, R.B. Adams Chief of Police RBA:ac � y MEMORANDUM March 7, 1983 TO: City Administrator/City Council FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: OLCC License Application RE: New License: BIG B THRIFTWAY 14363 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 New Owner: Robert E. and Gloria V. Oja 3206 N.W. 95th Place, Vancouver, WN. 89665 Sir: t It is recommended that the above named business license renewal request be approved, and forwarded to O.L.C.C. f i The status of the application remains the same; however, the business is under new owners. f Respectfully, R.B. Adams Chief of Police RBA:ac i 11 IN 11 IN MEMORANDUM March 9, 1983 TO: City Administrator/City Council FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: O.L.C.C. License Renewal RE: BERGMAN'S RESTAURANT 12725 S.W. Pacific Highway, Tigard, Or. 97223 Sir: It is recommended that the above named business license renewal request be approved, and forwarded to O.L.C.C. There is no status change in regard to the above request. Respectfully, ' R.B. Adams' Chief of Police RBA:ac t �5! y MEMORANDUM March 9, 1983 TO: City Administrator/City Council FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: O.L.C.C. License Renewal RE: Tigard Bowl 11660 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, OR. 97223 Sir: It is recommended that the above named business license renewal request be approved, and forwarded to O.L.C.C. There is no status change in regard to the above request. Respectfully, B A ams Chief of Police � 1 f RBA:ac i t f March 10, 198-1 MEMORANDUM 10: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING STAFF SUBJECT: PETITION FOR VACATION OF S.W. KABLE STREET BETWEEN S.W. BOONES FERRY AND S.W. 72nd City staff has received a petition to vacate S.W. Kable Street between Boones Ferry Road and S.W. 72nd from Southern Pacific Transportation Company. Southern Pacific has paid a fee for processing the petition and has asked the City Council to initiate the process. Since Southern Pacific owns all of the property abutting both sides of the street to be vacated, staff sees no need to require the petition signatures. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council initiate the process to vacate S.W. Kable street from S.W. 72nd to S.W. Boones Ferry Road. pm (0051P) i 4 c S E f "a e F i t d F (! f l t WKWANUMN SAMPLE FORM FOR PUBLICATIONS CITY OF TIGA11.11 NOTICE OE' PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED VACATION OF A PORTION OF S.W. 67TH AVENUE A 50 FOOT WIDE DEDICATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. Pursuant to resolution No. 81-89 of the City Council of Tigard, adopted August 10, 1981, under authority of Chapter 271 . 1310 Oregon Revised Statutes, a public hearing will be held by the Council of Tigard at 8:00 P.M. on Monday, September 14 , 1981, at Fowler Junior High School, Lecture Room, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street , Tigard, Oregon, with respect to the proposed vacation of the following described portion of S.W. 67th Avenue a dedicated public right-of-way in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, "EXHIBIT A" DESCRIPTION All of that portion of S.W. 67th Avenue in the Northest ; of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 60.0 feet wide, with its centerline being the centerline of S.W. 67th Avenue and extending northerly from the northerly right-of-way of S.W. Hampton Street a distance of 450.0 feet, to the southerly right-of-way of S.W. Gonzaga Street as. these streets are laid out in the plat of West Portland Heights, a recorded plat in Washington County, Oregon. Any objections or remonstrances against said proposal to vacate said areas may be made in writing and filed with the City Recorder prior to the date of the hearing and all objections filed prior to the date of hearing will be heard and considered, and any person having an interest in the proposal may likewise verbally be heard at said time and place. By order of the City Council of Tigard, this 10th day of August, 1981, Doris Hartig City Recorder TT Publish August 13,20,27, Sept. 3, 10, 1981 9115 ti i I14 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONE* ,� 9 17 Cao{ 2 OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. OREGON �JGGtt'' _ ,. U1 THE MATTER OF THE VACA!"1 N-OT � 3 THE DEDICATED 20 YASLE .- 4 Vacation Na. 41 STRIXT BETWEEN , 7, ® and OF KAN,g ACRE TpACTq *N THE S.E. 1/4 9 01, BECMON 12, T2S, i1W, .. ;A-, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON � i 9 This matter having came on for hearing before the Board of County Commis-sioners at its regular mooting on August 25, 1964, and having been uontinuod to 9 8eptsmbor 1, 19"; and 16 It appearing that heretofore, on July 20, 1964, N. W. Pottijohn at al, as 11 awturs o[the abutting property, did file with this Board a petition for the vacation 12 of the dedicated 20 foot S. W. [able Street as shown on the plat of Pablo Acte Tracts, } and that mora than 30 days have ex- it • plat of record in Washington County. Ocsgan, 14 pired althoe that time; and 1$ It finer appearing that said petition did describe the portion of the roadway If to be vacated, the names of the persons to be particularly affected, and set forth 17 the pier a1rcumAtan0e6 of the Gate; and fib Rt Nether apps r" from the affidavit of N. W. Pettijohn on file herein that jS n of the pandency of said patitian was given by written notice being posted more so th=10 days prior hereto, which notices were posted in three of the most public and 21 ocaspingWs places within the limits of said dedicated roadway; and 22 It further appearing that said notice contained a do$ -rigtlon of the property 23 to be vacated and specified the tame and place for the hearing on said petition, and 24 It further appearing that no objection has been made to said petition and E$ so eb"ction has boon made to the granting of said vacation order; 2� It further appearing that said vacation would not be detrimental to the inter- i di 27 este of the public and that good canto appears therefor; 28 Now. therefore, it in hereby RMOLVED AND ORDERED that the following 29 described roadway as shown on the plat of KWA*Acre Tracts, a plat of reoord in 20 washingtoo County, Oregon, be andVw same is hereby vacated, said portion being 31 described as follows: 32 Ml of the dedicated 20 foot S. W. Fable Street between Lots 6, 7, pap 1 - 9115 1 8 and 9 of Knble Acre Tracts In the S.E. 1/4 of Section 12, T2S, R1W, W.M., Washington County, Oregon. 2 3 It is further RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the county surveyor of Washing- 4 ton County be and he in hereby authorised and directed to mark that portion of said S roadway herein vacated as vacated upon the plats and records of Washington County. 6 It is further RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the property in said roadway 7 hereby vacated shall revert to and become the property of the adjoining property 4 owners holding and owning property within said Kable Acre Tracts, 9 DATED this let day of September, 1964, 10 11 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 12 13 airman 14 1S � 16 17 c 19 as 21 aezj5E__T.-VAN DYKE Cd 22 23 6TATT Or Oaa]OM 24 d e! .+ L Ake TT.m�n_D'". W F-d. s.d 2 [: 5 ��s. e•d h-0MKw M,ca.66, d C.��fso• Cg YI./d anuwtT�d. Ir,.t� eti1` hM .d Mdd_ � ,yd ad R S YYY 9999 _ __T Te 27 26 a— ... IlpOpl THOUSSEN.D� s 29 �S/O : D.wrt t 30 �® IS 39 '6if 31 32 I Fm®s 2 - 6.7io 33 ►AG£ 6 SM 5M rA%657 USF OF PUBLIC LANDS GE'NEAtALLY; SCL'NIC F.ASE:MFNTS 271.110 - DEFINITIONS vacated to its termini, the land embraced in an extension of the street for a distance of 400 271.005 Definitions. As used in this feet beyond each terminus shall also be count- chapter: ed. In the vacation of any plat or part thereof (1) "Governing body" means the board or the consent of the owner or owners of two- body in which the general legislative power of thirds in area of the property embraced within a political subdivision is vested. such plat or part thereof proposed to be vacat- (2) "Governmental body" means the State ed shall be sufficient, except where such vaca- of Oregon, a political subdivision, the United tion embraces street area, when, as to such States of America or an agency thereof. street area the above requirements shall also (3) "Political subdivision" means any local apply. The consent of the owners of the re- government unit, including, but not limited quired amount of property shall be in writing and duly acknowledged before an officer au- to, a county, city, town, port, dock commission thorized to take acknowledgments of deeds. or district, that exists under the laws of Oregon and has power to levy and collect 271.090 Filing of petition; notice. The taxes. 11981 c.787 §21 petition shall be presented to the city recorder or other recording officer of the city. If found VACATION by him to be sufficient, he shall file it and inform at least one of the petitioners when the 271.010 [Amended by 1965 c.25 §1; 1971 c.287 §1; petition will come before the city governing repealed by 1981 c.153§791 body. A failure to give such information shall 271.020 (Amended by 1953 c.283 §3; 1977 c.275 §1; not be in any respect a lack of jurisdiction for repealed by 1981 c.153§791 the governing body to proceed on the petition. 271.030 (Amended by 1953 c.283 §3; repealed by 1981 c.153§791 271.100 Action by council. The city 271.040[Repealed by 1981 c.153§791 governing body may deny the petition after notice to the petitioners of such proposed 271.050(Repealed by 1981 c.153§791 action, but if there appears to be no reason 271.060(Repealed by 1981 c.153§791 why the petition should not be allowed in 271.070[Repealed by 1981 c.153§791 whole or in part, the governing body shall fix a time for a formal hearing upon the petition. 271.080 Vacation in incorporated cities; petition; consent of property ovrn- 271.110 Notice of hearing. (1) The city ers. (1) Whenever any person interested in recorder or other recording officer of the city any real property in an incorporated city in shall give notice of the petition and hearing this state desires to vacate all or part of any by Publishing a notice in the city official four colisel=�' street, avenue, boulevard, alley, plat, public nevi: aper once each week for o square or other public place, such person may tive weeks. If no newspaper is published`i file a petition therefor setting forth a descrip- su41.city, written notice of the petition an tion of the ground proposed to be vacated, the heanng shall be posted in three of the most0 purpose for which the ground is proposed to be pulilic places in the city. The notices shall used and the reason for such vacation. describe the ground covered by the petition, glue the date it was filed, the name of at least (2) There shall be appended to such peti- tion,as a part thereof and as a basis for grant- one of the petitioners and the date when the petition, and any objection or remonstrance, ing the same, the consent of the owners of all which may be made in writing and filed with abutting property and of not less than two- the recording officer of the city prior to the thirds in area of the real property affected time of hearing,will be heard and considered. thereby. The real property affected thereby t� shall be deemed to be the land lying on either (Z) Within five days after the first day of . side of the street or portion thereof proposed publication of the notice the city recording to be vacated and extending Iaterally to the officer shall cause to be posted at or near each h; next street that serves as a parallel street, but end of the proposed vacation a copy of the in any case not to exceed 200 feet, and the notice which shall be headed,"Notice of Street land for a like lateral distance on either side Vacation," "Notice of Plat Vacation" or "No- of the street for 400 feet along its course be- tice of Plat and Street Vacation," as the case f yond each terminus of the part proposed to be may be; the notice shall be posted in at least \ vacated. Where a street is proposed to be two conspicuous places in the proposed vaca- 967 271.120 YUBLIC LANDS -,on area. Tlie posting and first clay of publico- (3) No ordinance for the vacation of all or tion of such notice shall be not less than 28 part of a plat shall be passed by the governing days before the hearing. body until the city recording officer has filed in his office or indorsed on the petition for (3) The city recording officer shall, before such vacation a certificate showing that all publishing such notice, obtain from the peti- city liens and all taxes have been paid on the tioners a sum sufficient. to cover the cost of lands covered by the plat or portion thereof to oublication, posting and other anticipated be vacated. <penses. The city recording officer shall hold the surn so obtained until the actual cost has (4) Any property owner affected by the been ascertained, when the amount of the cost order of vacation or the order awarding dam- shall be paid into the city treasury and any ages or benefits in such vacation proceedings surplus refunded to the depositor. may appeal to the circuit court of the county where such city is situated in the manner 271.120 Hearing- determination. At provided by the city charter. If the charter the time fixed by the governing body for hear- dc_ ; not provide for such appeal, the appeal ing the petitioi. and any objections filed there- shall be taken within the time and in substan- to or at any postponement or continuance of tially the manner provided for taking an such matter, the governing body shall hear appeal from justice or district court in civil the petition and objections and shall deter- cases. ;nine whether the consent of the owners of the requisite area has been obtained, whether 271.140 Title to vacated areas. The notice has been duly given and whether the title to the street or other public area vacated public interest will be prejudiced by the vaca- shall attach to the lands bordering on such tion of such plat or street or parts thereof. If area in equal portions; except that where the such matters are determined in favor of the area has been originally dedicated by differ- petition the governing body shall by ordinance ent persons and the fee title to such area has -:ke such determination a matter of record not been otherwise disposed of, original -lid vacate such plat or street; otherwise it boundary lines shall be adhered to and the shall deny the petition. The governing body street area which lies on each side of such may, upon hearing, grant the petition in part boundary line shall attach to the abutting nd deny it in part, and make such reserva- prcperty on such side. If a public square is kions, or either, as appear to be for the public vacated the title thereto shall vest in the city. interest. [Amended by 1981 c.153§581 271.150 Vacation records to be filed; costs. A certified copy of the ordinance vacat- ing any street or plat area and any map, plat or other record in regard thereto which may be required or provided for by law, shall be filed for record with the county clerk. The petitioner for such vacation shall bear the recording cost and the cost of preparing and filing the certified copy of the ordinance and map. A certified copy of any such ordinance u _VMUh ereor R.g shall be filed with the county assessor and county surveyor. ers�o ' e~abuttLnpro kl4peygi£ 271.160 Vacations for purposes of ° ,1Yect°the�'4t�5� rededication. No street shall be vacated upon VroF�_-rty.xmlessithe the petition of any person when it is proposed to replat or rededicate all or part of any street n in lieu of the original unless such petition is '� zr3ilaznzer. accompanied by a plat showing the proposed manner of replatting or rededicating. If the (2) Two or more streets, alleys, avenues proposed manner of replatting or rededicating boulevards, or parts thereof, may be or any modification thereof which may subse- joined in one proceeding, provided they inter- quently be made meets with the approval of (\ sect or are adjacent and parallel to each.other. the city governing body, it shall require a 968 I southern Pacific TrcznspcwtcMon Complany Room 251-N Union Station A 800 Northwest Sixth Avenue - Portland,Oregon 97209 L.L.PHI r■ IN A[►LT►LEA.E A[/EA To •UEAINT[NDENT :.1.MELBO A[[IETANT•Ur[AtNTEHDEHT T.P.RUSSELL January 17, 1983 626-22 A[._..T[U I'EN INT[NDEHT J.W.FERGUSON AEGIO NAL ENGIN[[A GELUERT ACA CHGIHEEA RECEIVED Mr. Frank A. Currie JAN 2 0 1983 City of Tigard Director of Public Works -01y Ofjjamp P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Currie: Southern Pacific Transportation Company proposes to use property in Kable Acre Tracts for expansion of automobile storage facilities at Tigard, and wishes to petition for vacation of Kable Street. Attached are four prints of Oregon Division Drawing D-1839 r showing area of Kable Street that we wish to request for vacation. Also attached is voucher for payment as quoted by you to this office for fee to process vacation of Kable Street. If additional information is required, please contact Area Engineers Office, Portland, Oregon, telephone 228-8181, ext. 303, Mr. McDonald. Yours truly, Attach. PJM/dr f L • - / / m 1 I� C ' ai - 3TREET 'A' aTED 964 RECOPDED IT :DK 53C SAGE 656 � - -- --------'w�-- -- -- -1 I� 1 r' ^' V I Lr7 1 .�/ CD� j I ml aD PA coI J1 / LDI /� r.10 5 l March 10, 1983 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Frank A. Currie, Public Works Director SUBJ: Engineering Services Agreements The city staff has generally been using two types of agreements for engineering services. One for projects where the feasibility study and engineers report have been completed and one where the study and report are included. (Copies of each are included in your packet. ) On projects where the feasibility study and engineers report are required, the various services are separated and paid for as follows: A. Planning Services (Feasibility study and engineers report) Paid by the hour as enumerated in appendix 'A' plus direct �- expenses (usually 2.1 to 2.5 X the salary costs) . i B. Final Design Services and Service During Construction Paid for as a percentage of the bid according to ASCE Manual #45 C. On Site Inspection Paid by the hour as enumerated in appendix 'A' (usually 2.1 to 2.5 times the salary costs) . D. Other Services Paid by the hour as enumerated in appendix 'A' (usually 2.1 to 2.5 times the salary costs) . Specific services in each area are enumberated in Article 2. Another method of paying for the services required to initiate and complete a project would be to ask the engineering consultant to provide a percentage of the bid price for the complete project. This method will generally result in a higher price for all but the simplest of projects because there are too many areas of "unknowns" at the time the agreement is entered into. If an estimate for the complete job is too low it could result in a less thorough job than required to protect the city's interest and result in costly law suits. AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR t PUBLIC WORKS I14PROVEHENTS I For the consideration hereinafter set forth, MARLIN DE HAAS S ASSOCIATES, INC., A ! professional engineering firm, hereinafter referred to as the ENGINEER, agrees to lprovide engineering services to THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON hereinafter referred to as the OWNER, for PLANNING SERVICES, FINAL DESIGN SERVICES, SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION, ON-SITE INSPECTION SERVICES and OTHER SERVICES for a project generally described as: S.W. 72nd Avenue Street Im rovements The generally intended scope of the project envisions improvements to S.W. 72nd Avenue from-S.W. Varnes Street on the north to the Tigard city limits on the south, a distance of approximately two miles. The basic improvements proposed are: A typical street section including a 44 foot paved surface with curbs (two travel lanes) , left turn refuges where appropriate and traffic/pedestrian controls, bus pullouts and walkways where appropriate and a landscaped median where appropriate; Storm Drainage; Lighting; Railroad Crossing and Signals revisions as necessary; undergrounding existing overhead utilities and such other miscellaneous improvements as may be required to complete the basic project. ARTICLE 1. It is the intent of this AGREEMENT that the ENGINEER will provide all the usual services necessary to plan, design, construct and otherwise effect the full completion of the project. As the project is a Locallmprovement District, certain procedures are required, some of which should most properly be conducted by the City. Those functions include but are not limited to the following: 1. Miscellaneous administration as necessary by city staff to implement the project. 2. Assist with processing of resolutions as required in the L.I.D. process. 3. Assist with advertisement of notices as are required in the L.I .D. process. 4. Coordinate with the consultant (ENGINEER) in reviewing the scope of the project, reviewing the plans and specifications, and providing miscellaneous information and direction as deemed proper and necessary to assure the continuity of the project. 5. Approve progress payments, change orders etc. , with due consideration to Engineer's recommendation thereinregard. ( 6. Assist with right-of-way acquisition, including condemnation if necessary, after the ENGINEER has established and described the ri&ht-of_-wayto be acquired. v / 7. Award of the Construction Contract(s) after review and' consideration of the Engineer's Recommendation(s) of Award. 8. Conduct of all public meetings and hearings and the bid opening as required. 9. Assist in consultation with Washington County and the impacted Railroad Companies and Utility Commissioner and other Agencies as necessary re- garding right-of-way acquisition and other matters pertaining to the project. 10. Docket the assessment and otherwise carry out the usual Bancrofting process. It is understood that the ENGINEER will provide applicable information to the City to assist in the above functions and insure efficiency in carrying out these tasks. ARTICLE 2. The specific services which the ENGINEER agrees to furnish are as follows: 1. Collect all data and information necessary to reasonably identify the project alternatives. 2. Prepare an ENGINEERS REPORT which will provide sufficient information about the scope and estimated costs of the project, such information and cost estimates to be used in the conduct of the public hearing lead- ing to formation of the Local Improvement District. The ENGINEER'S REPORT will include, but not be limtied to the following: a. A narrative discussing the general scope of the project and alternatives to be considered. b. The Preliminary Plan map illustrating the basic features of the project. c. The Ownership Report for each parcel proposed for assessment, identifying the owner, the assessed valuation, outstanding assessments (if any) , bonding capacity, proposed assessment, bonding deficiency (if any) , and the area for use in calculation of remonstrances. d. The Preliminary Estimate of costs, to include estimated engineer.-M.-V construction and right-of-way acquisition cost 'b:eakdowns. e. The Preliminary Assessment map, to include parcel and right- of-way delineation/identification. i f. The Notice of Public clearing, and tentative project scheduling. \ 3. Some private ownerships will need special design consideration; Engineer shall meet with them to determine such needs and shall incorporate same in his final design. (2) s- \ 4. Meet with appropriate CITY, COUNTY, RAILROAD COMPANY (and Utility Commissioner) and UTILITY COMPANY(S) or ot.her governmental officials in discussing the project and arriving at an acceptable configuration and design and, also, to develop and provide a tentative project implementation schedule. 5. Attend Council, or other meetings as appropriate and make whatever presentations are necessary, including preparation of maps, displays, reports or materials as are appropriate in pursuing approval of the project. 6. Provide a CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION recommending City approval of the construction contracts. 7. Prepare the ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION OF ASSESSMENT which will provide all necessary information for use in conducting the final assessment hearing, including but not limited to the following: a. A narrative discussing the total project as it has been constructed and the ENGINEERS recommendation of final assessments. b. The Final Report of all cost related to the project. i c. The Final Assessment Map. ( d. The Final Assessment Roll. I. Prepare plans and specifications (bidding documents) for the improvements as are customarily made available for construction of these types of projects and based upon preliminary design approved by the OWNER; Coordinate same with impacted utility and governmental agencies. 2. Prepare estimates of material quantities to be furnished and work to be done, such estimates to be based upon prices which the ENGINEER, exercising his experience and judgment in applying current cost data deems to be appropriate at the time the plans are complete. 3. Process the documents with all appropriate regulatory agencies included but not limited to the CITY, WASHINGTON COUNTY, the STATE OF OREGON, RAILROAD COMMISSIONER, and UTILITY COMPANIES. 4. Provide general information in regard to the PROJECT and consult with the OWNER or those designated by the OWNER to prepare necessary agree- ments, such as those for rigats-of-way easements and land purchase; and provide a more precise and detailed construction schedule. 5. Furnish sufficient copies of plans, specifications and documents for obtaining project approval. (3) t r F ( 6. Prepare and/or provide for a (construction) "traffic control plan" for aproval by other affected parties. 1. Furnish sufficient copies of plans and specifications for obtaining bids and for construction. 2. Provide for receiving and tabulating construction proposals; analyze and report the results to the OWNER; and recommend and assist in awarding the contract(s) for construction. 3. Provide interpretations of the plans and specifications, and make written evaluations/recommendations thereinregard. 4. Make periodic visits to the site of the PROJECT to observe the progress and quality of the work and to determine if the work is proceeding in accordance with the intent of the Contract Documents, and provide periodic written reports to the City thereinregard. 5. Coordinate the work of laboratories in the inspection and test of materials used in the construction; receive and evaluate all reports by such laboratories or bureaus. 6. Review shop drawings, diagrams, illustrations, catalog data, schedules ? and samples, the results of tests and inspections, and other data which the contractor is required to submit for conformance with the design concept of the PROJECT and compliance with the information given In the Contract Documents, and make written recommendations thereinregard (to the City) . 7. Supervise the work of the on-site inspection personnel and other field personnel. 8. Submit monthly progress payment recommendations (monthly estimates) and prepare and submit contract change orders (along with a written recommendation for action thereinregard) . 9. Make a final inspection of the construction jointly with representatives of the CITY and submit a final report (final estimate) upon which final settlement and termination of the construction contract(s) car, be based. 10. Attend meetings with the contractor involving construction and/or progress payment disputes/conflicts. D. MIMI 1. Furnish the on-site inspection personnel to act as agent(s) of the OWNER, through the Engineer, in his relations with the construction contractor(s) and affected utility company(s) ; to prepare monthly progress reports on the work; to determine the amounts of payments due to contractor(s) as set forth in the construction contract(s) ; and to keep all records, maps and plans necessary for the preparation of drawings showing the project as finally constructed. (4) 1. Furnish survey personnel and equipment required to obtain field infor- mation necessary to prepare satisfactory plans and specifications, ease- ments, use permits and property rights-of-way descriptions and to provide construction staking, coordinating same with needs of the contractor, etc. 2. Furnish personnel and equipment required to perform subsurface ex- plorations necessary for determining geologic foundation and/or con- struction conditions. 3. Furnish legal descriptions of easements, rights-of-way and property required for the PROJECT and provide personnel to assist the OWNER to obtain easements, use permits, rights-of-way and property. 4. Assist legal, financial or other consultants engaged for the project. 5. Submit one complete set of acceptable reproducible plans of the work as it is finally constructed, to the CITY for record purposes. 6. Provide Administrative* Services during construction which are outside of the basic fee for FINAL DESIGN and SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION such as: Meetings and negotiations involving claims and legal complaints. Additional work resulting from delinquency or insolvency of the contractor; or as a result of damage to the construction project caused by fire, flood, earthquake or other acts of God, all exclusive or additional work resulting from litigation. Additional work resulting from strikes, walkouts, or other acts of trade or labor unions. 7. Provide miscellaneous consulting and other services, associated with the PROJECT, not stipulated elsewhere in this Agreement, when re- quested by the OWNER. ARTICLE 3. As consideration for providing the services enumerated in ARTICLE 2, the OWNER shall pay the ENGINEER; v , as enumerated in ARTICLE 2, the amount of the ENGINEEV a-Salary Costs, as defined in ARTICLE 4, expended for the services multiplied by a•;factor of 2.1 plus direct expenses in connection therewith. enumerated in ARTICLE 2, the OWNER S `pay the ENGINEER a sum which shu I"Wd- aced upon the schedule of suggested fees and procedures for applying percentage of construction cost fees of the American Socienty of Civil Engineers, Manual No. 45, which is in effect upon the date of notice to proceed. (5) "-e-, percentages for projects whose costs fall between the figures shown in 3nua1 No. 45 should be interpolated in the same number of significant figures. It is agreed that a percentage charge obtained by averaging curves A and B (attached hereto) shall be applied to each schedule or group of schedules which are bid in the same document and which are awarded to one general contractor under one contract. Eighty percent (80X) of the above total fee shall apply. to FINAL DESIGN SERVICES and -the remainder shall be applied to SERVICES DURING CONSTPJJCTION. C. 919M as enumerated in ARTICLE 2, the amount of the ENGINEER'S-Salary Costs, as defined in ARTICLE 4, expended for the services, multiplied by a factor of 2.1, plus direct expenses in connection therewith. D enumerated in ARTICLE 2, and for additional services not speci ca. ly provided forereunder, the amount of the ENGINEER'S Salary Costs, as defined in ARTICLE 4, expended for the services, multiplied by a factor of 2.1, plus direct expenses in connection therewith. ARTICLE 4. It is further mutually agreed by the parties hereto: A. That, the PROJECT is a Local Improvement District and that a decision whether to form the district and proceed with Final Design and Construction will be made by the City Council after the usual public hearing. Accordingly, Engineering Services will be ( ovided in two (2) phases; Phase I being those services required to take the PROJECT _nrough the Public Bearing on Formation of the District and Phase II being the final -sign and construction phase after the district is formed. The ENGINEER will not begin the final design phase until, and if, the district is successfully formed. B. That, the OWNER shall make available to the ENGINEER all technical data in the OWNER'S possession, including maps, surveys, borings, record drawings and other information required by the ENGINEERS and relating to his work. C. That, the ENGINEER'S estimated costs of construction shall be used as a basis for monthly, partial or final payments of the ENGINEER'S fee until the actual costs have been established by proposals or by contracts for construction. D. That, the costs of construction used as a basis for computation of payment means the total cost for the execution of the work, excluding fees or other cost for engineering and legal services, the cost of land, rights-of way, compensation for damages to property, legal, and administrative expenses, but including the cost of all construction contracts, items of construction, whether provided by private contractor(s) or the OWNER; including labor, materials and equipment required for the completed work (including extras) but without deduction for penalties, liquidated damages or other amounts withheld from payments to the contractor(s) and including the total value at site of the PROJECT of all labor, materials and equipment purchased or furnished directly to the OWNER for the PROJECT E. That, the cost of construction used as a basis for computation or the Q;INEER'S fee for a project which has not been constructed shall mean the lowest bona e bid received from a qualified bidder for such PROJECT, or for a PROJECT for rich bids have not been received, shall mean the ENGINEER'S last estimate of the construction cost for the PROJECT. (6) E F. That, visits to the construction site and observations made by the ENGINEER s part or SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION shall not relieve the construction contractor(s) of his obligation to conduct comprehensive inspections of the work sufficient to ensure conformance with the intent of the Contract Documents, and shall not relieve the construction contractor(s) of his full responsibility for all construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures necessary for coordinating and completing all portions of the work under the construction contract(s) and for all safety pre- cautions incidental thereto. Such visits by the ENGINEER are not to be construed as part of the inspection duties of the on-site inspection personnel defined in other parts of this Agreement. G. That, on-site inspection personnel will make every reasonable effort to guard the OWNER•agaa.nst defects and deficiencies in the PROJECT and to help determine if the provisionW of the Contract Documsnts are being fulfilled. Their day-to-day inspection will not, however, cause the ENGINEER to be responsible for those duties and responsibilities which belong to the construction contractor(s) and which include, but are not limited to, full responsibility £or the techniques and sequences of construction and the safety precautions incidental thereto, and for performing the construction work in accordance VLth the Contract Documents. R. That, the ENGINEER'S Salary'Costs are defined as the amount of the wages or salaries of the ENGINEER'S employees working on the PROJECT, plus thirty percent (30X) of such wages and salaries to cover all taxes, payments and premiums measured by or applicable to such wages or salaries, such as, but not limited to Worker's ^ompensation insurance, medical-hospital insurance, salary continuation insurance, _.ension plan costs, and pro rata allowances for vacation, sick leave and holiday pay. .ie ENGINEER'S Salary Costs are understood to be established -by the ENGINEER'S Fee -chedule for Professional Services currently in effect on the date of execution of this Agreement, copy attached hereto. I. That, the ENGINEER'S direct expenses are defined as the costs incurred on or directly for the PROJECT, other than the Salary Costs (as defined hereinbefore) . Direct expenses shall include mileage at $0.25 per mile when the ENGINEER'S own automobiles are used. When technical or professional services have been furnished by outside sources, as requested or approved by the OWNER, an additional five percent (5%) of the cost of these services shall be added for the ENGINEER'S administrative and continuing PROJECT responsibilities, conditional to his participation therein. J. That, when the OWNER directs that competitive bids be taken for construction on alternate design, where this involves the preparation of designs, plans and specifications for alternate facilities, the compensation to the ENGINEER shall be the payment specified in ARTICLE 3 for the FINAL DESIGN of the work to be constructed, plus the alternate designs prepared for work not constructed, an additional payment to be negotiated at the time the OWNER directs that alternative designs, plans and specifications be prepared. K. That, the OWNER shall pay for cost of personnel and equipment for test r. borings, subsurface explorations, or other investigations required for the determination of foundation and geologic conditions, except the ENGINEER shall not order such tests -r investigations to be made without prior approval of the OWNER, Frank A. Currie, _o have authority to give such approval. t (7) s ' u u r ' L. That, in soils investigation work and in determining subsurface conditions for the PROJECT, the characteristics may vary greatly between successive test points and sample intervals. The ENGINEER will perform this work in accordance with generally zacccpted soils-engineering practices and makes no other warranties, expressed or implied, as to the professional advise provided under the terms of this Agreement. M. That, payment to the ENGINEER as prescribed in ARTICLE 3, is to be made within thirty (30) days after date of billing, in accordance with the ENGINEER'S estimate of the value of work accomplished during the month. If amounts due are not paid within the period specified, service and billing charges on the unpaid balance will accrue at the rate of one and one-half (1�X) percent per month. N. That, if any portion of the PROJECT covered by this Agreement and designed or specified by the ENGINEER shall be suspended, abated, abandoned or terminated, the OWNER shall pay the ENGINEER for the services rendered for such suspended, abated, abandoned or terminated work, the payment to be based insofar as possible on the amounts established in this Agreement or, where the Agreement cannot be applied, the payment shall be based on the basis of the amounts for OTHER SERVICES, as prescribed in ARTICLE 3. 0. That, the OWNER shall pay for all ccsts of publishing advertisements for bids and for permits, licenses and fees that may be required by local, State or Federal authorities and shall secure the necessary land, easements and rights-of- way- P. That, in the event of any action brought by either party against the other to enforce any of the obligations hereunder or arising out of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions hereby created, the losing party shall pay the prevailing party such reasonable amounts for fees, costs and expenses as may be set by the Court. Q. That, in the event of any legal or other controversy requiring the services of the ENGINEER; in providing- expert -testimony in connection with the PROJECT, except -suits or claims by third parties against-the OWNER arising out bf errors or- omissions of the ENGINEER the OWNER shall pay the ENGINEER for services rendered in regard to such legal or other controversy, including costs of preparation for the controversy, on the basis of charges for OTHER SERVICES, as prescribed .in ARTICLE. 3, in addition to' other sums of money payable under this Agreement. R. That, this Agreement is to be binding on the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and is not to be assigned by either party without first obtaining written consent of the other. ARTICLE 5. 7N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate this day of 1980. OWNER C by ( C MARLI DE 6 q b T•S INC. F Y a Mar De H as, President t (8) . r f MARLIN DE HAAS & ASSOCIATES INC. FEE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (HOURLY RATES) JANUARY, 1980 Total Fee (Per Multiplier) POSITION 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Professional Engr. (Principal) $32.60 $34.20 $35.86 $37.50 Design Draftsman (Project Engr.) 24.60 25.80 27.10 28.30 Inspector 17.60 18.50 19.40 20.20 Draftsman 16.40 17.20 18.00 18.90 Clerical 13:40 14. 10 14.70 15.40 Survey Manager 26.80 28.14 29.50 30.80 ( Party Chief 23.60 24.80 26.00 27.10 Head Chain 15.00 15.75 16.50 17.30 Rear Chain 12.30 12.90 13.50 14.20 2-titan Crew 38.60 40.50 42.50 44.40 3-than Crew 50.30 53.30 55.90 58.40 Computer Time No Charge Electronic Distance Measurement (EDM) No Charge Mileage $0.20/mile NOTE: If work remains to be Cone beyond December 31 , 1980, the balance of the fees to be earned on each subsequent January First will be modified in accordance with the Construction Cost Index of Engineering News Record, a McGraw Hill (_ Publication of nationwide circulation widely used in the construction industry for this purpose. The Construction Cost Index used as a basis will be the Index figure existing on January 1 , 1980. i i r AGREF:?�:::T FOR E.`iGI'c:_FR'LN'.G SERVICES CirY 0: TIGARD T.rASHIVGTO\ COUNTY, OREGON VILS AGREE'fE`T AMD CO:�"CRACT, [nade and ente=red into at Tigard, Oreton, this clay of __ , 198__, by and between the City of Tigard of Washington Cousity, State of Oregon, hereinafter called tlie City, and a firm of consulting engineers duly authorized to per Corn professional services in the State of Oregon, hereinafter called the En<,ine e rs WITNESSETH THAT: 1-111FtLAS, the City now desires to employ the ntineers to perform the engineering design and the preparation of detailedplans, specifications and contract documents and the performance of other professional services, which are necessary for the construction of the following designated public works improvements: T..ME'REAS, the Engineers have offered their services to perform [lie necessary surveys, engineering designs, preparation of plans and specifications and other contract documents and the related professional services required for the implementation of the public works improvements. IT IS AGREED BET::TEEM THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I - DEFI141TIONS Whenever the term "City" is used herein it is understood to mean the City bf Titard of Washington County, Oregon, or its authorized officers and the ter.. "Engineer" or "Engineers" weans an authorized representative(s) of _ ARTICLE II - OBLIGATION OF THE ENGINEERS The services to be performed by said Engineers under this contract are (A) the professional services required for the preparation of detailed plans, specifications and other contract documents proceeding the actual construction work, (B) engineering services during construction, and (C) special services which may be required. The Engineers will coordinate their work with other Engineers who may be engaged by the City. The services to be performed by the Engineers are described more particular Ly as folloo-rs: AGREEI't NT - Page I A. Professional Services Preceeding Construction: 1 . Detailed Plans. The E6r.ineer will collect the necessary data including information from utility conpanies and other field information and will prepare detailed plans for all units of said improvements. These plans will include the necessary details for the public works facilities as well as other drawings which may be essential to full completion of all units of the said improvements. 2. Specifications. After the plans have been made the Engineers will prepare such detailed specifications, contract forms and other documents as will be necessary in the receiving of bids for construction work and in the performance of contract obligations_ The specifications will cover materials and workmanship and serve as a guide to the building of all features of the project which may not be fully defined by the plans. 3. Quantity and Cost Estimates. The Engineers will prepare estimates of the quantities of the materials to be furnished and work to be done. Estimates of cost will be provided which are to be based upon prices which appear to be appropriate at the time of plans are complete. 4. Amendments of Plans or Specifications. When plans, specifications and other documents have been prepared they will be submitted to the. City for consideration. An engineer familiar With all features of the project will be available on request of the City for the purpose of explaining the plans and other documents. Should the City then request modifications of any kind which are consistent with good engineering practice, the Engineers will make them be— for the final documents are issued. 5. Approval of Regulatory Agencies. The Engineers will plan the improve— ments so as to meet the approval of the Oregon Environmental Quality Comu►ission and other governmental agencies which may be involved, and will assist the City in any way appropriate to securing the necessary approvals for the facilities planned. 6. Copies of Pians and Specifications. After their approval by the City and the regulatory agencies, the Engineers will furnish as a part of this contract the following copies of the plans and specifications above described: a) Six (6) complete sets to the City for record purposes. b) As many copies as may be required by other agencies involved, as listed in Appendix 'B' . c) As many copies as may be required by Contractors desiring to submit bids on the work:, it being understood that deposits will be required to provide for the return of such plans issued and that a charge may be made by the Engineers for plans and specifications which may be issued to persons from whom no bona fide bid is received by the City. k d) Ten (10) sets of documents as may be required in connection with the preparation of contracts for construction work. �f- AGREEIIEtiT - Page 2 s7 e) Three (3) complete sets of "as built" plans of the work, as it is finally constructed, to the City for record purposes, one of which will be a set of transparencies. 7. Contract Awards. A qualified representative of the Engineers will attend meetings when the receiving of bids and the award of contracts for construction work are under consideration. They will prepare a tabulation of bids and will advise and assist the City in any way appropriate to such occassions. B. Professional Services During Construction.: 1. General Engineering. The Engineers will provide general inspection of the Contractor's work in behalf of the City, to the extent defined in the contract documents, by periodic visits to the site of the project to observe the progress and quality of the work and to determine, in general, if the work is proceeding in accordance with the intent of the contract documents. On the basis of these visits, the Engineers will keep the City informed of the progress of the work, will guard the City against defects and deficiencies in the work of the Contractor(s) and may reject work or materails that fail to conform to contract requirements. Visits to the construction site and observations made by the Engineers shall not relieve the Contractor of his obligation to conduct comprehensive inspections of the work sufficient to insure conformance with the intent of the contract documents, and shall not relieve the construction contractor of his full responsibility for all construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures necessary for coordinating and completing all portions of the Work under the construction contract and for all safety precautions incidental thereto. The Engineers shall make explanation of any matter which may not be clearly shown on the plans or in the specifications, inclt)d_ng the modifications of documents if this should be required. They shall prepare and recommend approval of change orders when applicable. They shall review Contractor's shop drawings and approve material samples. 2. Final Inspections. The Engineers will make a final inspection of the p completed construction work and report thereon to the City with recommendations concerning its acceptance or otherwise as conditions may warrant. 3. Resident Inspection of Construction and Field Staking. The Engineers will furnish the services of a Resident Inspector to provide continuous in- spection of the work to the Contractor during the period of construction as well as field personnel and equipment necessary for construction staking. The. Resident Inspector shall be experienced in the type of work to be done to the end that the work will be properly staked out and that competent inspection of materials and labor will be provided. He will keep all records, maps, and plans necessary for the preparation of final "as built" drawings. The Resident Inspector will make out weekly reports of construction and monthly estimates as the basis for payments to the Contractor as construction proceeds. He will attend the official meetings of the City each month when the above mentioned- reports and estimates are being considered and will also attend other meetings of the City when requested. Additional engineers, inspectors or assistants necessary shall be provided by the Engineers with the approval of the City. The Resident Inspector and necessary asssist-ants will guard the City against defects and deficiencies in the work of the contractor(s) and help determine if the provisions of the contract documents are being fulfilled. Their day-to-day in- spection will not, however, cause the Engineer to be responsible for those duties and responsibilities which belong to the Contractor and which include, but are' notlimited to, full responsibility for the techniques r �® and sequences of construction and the safety precautions incidental thereto, and for performing. the construction work in accordance with the contract f` documents. C. a)ecial Services: There may be certain special services desired by the City beyond those listed under the design and engineering inspection of construction. The type and extent of all such special services cannot be determined at this tiw.e. However, the Engineers agree to assist the City and perform such special services as the City of may require, all in order that the City can best accomplish the objective limitt ed providing the facilities needed. Such services may include but are not to the following: a) Furnish survey personnel and equipment required to obtain design in- formation necessary to prepare satisfactory plans and specifications. b) Furnish survey personnel and equipment required to obtain field in- formation necessary to prepare easements and property right-of-:gay descriptions as requested or approved by the City. c) Furnish legal descriptions of easements, rights-of-way and property required for the project and provide personnel to assist the City or those designated by the City to obtain easements,, rights-of-.ray, and property as requested by the City. d) Assist in preparation of Federal grant applications. 4 e) Assist in preparation of Engineers` report for preliminary assessment, assessment district maps, lien dockets,. assessment rolls, and other work connected -with assessment procedures, and assist in public hearings on the proposed assessments as requested or approved by the City. f) Provide personnel and equipment required to perform subsurface explorations necessary for determining foundation and/or construction conditions as requested or approved by the City. g) Provide bacteriological, chemical, mechanical or other tests as requested or approved by the City. h) Assist the City in the development of design and construction standards. i) Provide expert testimony as may be required in connection with the project. j) Furnish written operating, instruction and assemble a complete set of manufacturers' data and catalogs covering the equipment installed in the project. k) After completion of the project and acceptance from the Contractor(s) by the City, provide assistance and supervision as required to train the City's personnel for operation and maintenance of the new facilities. i- AGREEREiIT - Page 4 FURTHER, it is agreed between the parties hereto as follows: Insurance. The Engineers shall maintain such insurance as will protect them and the City from claims under the Workmen's Compensation Act. Time Schedule. The Engineers shall begin work within 10 days after notice to proceed and shall diligently prosecute the work to meet the time schedule(s) adopted by the City. ARTICLE III - OBLIGATION OF CITY The work required under this contract shall not begin nor shall the City assume : obligation for the work involved until the Engineers are given written notice to proceed and the scope of the work authorized outlined in detail. In order to facilitate the work of the Engineers as above outlined and to in- sure proper and adequate planning in construction procedure the City shall furnish to the Engineers access to all existing information which is in its possession concerning the location of sewer and water lines and other utilities or structures which may affect the planning and construction of the proposed improvements. Should it be necessary to excavate in order to locate and make available to the Engineers any existing structures necessary for proper planning of the proposed work, the City shall cause such excavation and incidental work connected therewith to be done without cost to the Engineers. The City shall pay for the cost of publishing advertisements for bids, and for permits and licenses that may be required by local, State, or Federal authorities and shall secure the necessary land, easements, and rights-of-way. FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the Engineers faithfully performing the services herein stipulated, the City shall pay them sums which shall be as outlined below in accordance with the services rendered: A. For the engineering services as outlined in Article II, Sections A(1-7) and B (1&2) , required for the design of public works facilities, the City shall pay the Engineers a sum which shall be determined by(Curve A)or(Curve Was recommended by the schedule of suggested fees of the current Manual No. 45 of American Society of Civil Engineers applicable upon the date notice to proceed is issued. For projects involving modifications, expansion, or renovation of existing facilities the basic fee under the above-mentioned curves shall be increased by a negotiated per cent depending upon the circumstances. a) Monthly progress payments shall be made to the Engineers during the preparation of the detailed plans, and such progress payments shall be based upon progress estimates of the work done, which have been submitted by the Engineers and approved by the City. AGREEMENT - Page 5 On b) When the plans and specifications have been completed and approved, i the City shall pay the Engineers a sum which with all previous pay- ments shall equal 80 percent of the total fee applicable based on the Engineer's estimate at the time the plans and specifications are submitted to the City. c) The balance of the fee shall be paid to the Engineers during con- struction in proportion to the work completed by the contractor(s) . B. For the services the Resident Inspector and other inspectors or assistants required for the construction inspection and field staking as outlined in Article II, Section B (3), the City shall pay the Engineers scheduled rates as set forth in Appendix "A". These rates include all supplies required for the work and automobile transportation within a 5 mile radius or the Engineer's office. C. For soils investigations which may be required as outlined in Article II, Section C, the Engineers shall be reimbursed at their invoiced costs plus 13 per- cent, for the services of soils specialists, laboratory testing and required sampling, drilling and/or excavation. For other technical or professional services furnished by outside sources, as requested or approved by the City, an additional 8 per cent shall be added to cover the Engineers' administrative and continuing project responsi- bilities. D. For any special services required by the Engineers ' staff as outlined in Article II, Section C, of this Agreement, the City agrees to pay the Engineers scheduled rates as set forth in Appendix "A", automobile travel within a 5 mile radius of the Engineers' office is included in the scheduled rates. All other costs of the Engineers will be billed at the actual amounts of such costs. These costs, as applicable, will include, but are not necessarily limited to obtaining as con- structed plans, printing and reproduction work. E. If the City directs that competitive bids are taken for construction on alternate designs, where this involves the preparation of designs, plans, and specifications for alternate structures, the compensation to the Engineers shall be the payment specified in Article III, Section A, for the design of work to be constructed, plus , for the alternate designs prepared for work not constructed, an additional payment to be negotiated at the time the City directs that alternative designs, plans and specifications be prepared. F. If the Engineering services covered in this Agreement have not been completed upon_ the expiration of an eighteen (18) month period from the date of execution of this Agreement, the City or Engineers may, at the option of either, on written notice, request a renogotiation of Article III, Sections A-D, (providing for the compensation to be paid Engineers for services renderer), to allow for changes in the cost of services. Such new schedule of compensation is to apply only to work performed by the Engineers after delivery date of such written notice. G. If time of construction is extended because of circumstances beyond the control of the Engineers, payments for Article II, Section B(1), General Engineering - Professional Services During Construction, shall apply only through the period ending thirty (30) calendar days after the applicable completion date specified in the construction contract of the project. Payment for this service beyond thirty (30) ? days after -said specified completion date shall be paid for under Article III, Section D. AGREEMENT - Page 6 H. The City may, in its sole discretion, abandon or indefinitely postpone the project for which the professional services described herein are to be performed { and may thereupon terminate this Agreement by giving the Engineers written notice of such abandonment or indefinite postponement. If any portion of the project covered in this Agreement and designed or specified by the Engineers shall be sus— pended, abated, or abandoned, the City shall pay the Engineers for the services rendered for such suspended, abated or abandoned work, the payment to be based in— sofar as possible on the amounts established in this Agreement , or, where the Agreement cannot be applied, the payment shall be on the basis of the amounts as prescribed in Article III, Section D. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this contract to be executed in duplicate by their respectively authorized officers or representatives. CITY OF TIGARD sy By Approved as to form: City Attorney ENGINEERS By By AGREEMENT — Page 7 APPENDIX "A" Ii ENGINEER: Scheduled Rates OFFICE Principal $ per hour ,e n Project Engineer n n Engineer EIT Design Technician n n Draftsman ,r ,r Non-Technician FIELD Three-man crew $ per hour If If Two-man crew if it Resident Engineer it of Resident Inspector j (1) Field rates include field equipment and transportation cost within a 5-mile radius of our office. Travel outside a 5-mile radius shall be charged at cents per mile. ffitm AN f March 10, 1983 t MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Public Works Director SUBJECT: Consultant selection for ain Street Development LID 438. Council has asked for a recommendation from the Public Works Department on the choice of a consultant for the Main Street to Ash public improvements known as LID #38. The following is a priority list with reasons why I think each firm should be chosen. 1. McKenzie Engineering Dave Larsen Project Engineer. McKenzie Engineering has been involved in this project for the developer for over a year. They are familiar with the project and the have participated in the City Planning and City Council ( processes to date. McKenzie has done the Main Street LID #37 in a most professional and thorough manner to date. They would be willing to give us a lump sum bid based on a percentage of the contract bid price but would prefer the conventional public contract we have used in the past. 2. DeHass and Associates Marlin DeHass Project Engineer 1:-, my opinion Mr. DeHass has the most experience in doing engineering and project management in the best interest of the public on LID projects of any of the Engineers on our consultant selection list. This recommendation is based on a personal working relationship over the last 15 years. 3. Coopers and Associates KeithThompson Project Manager Cooper has experience, through Mr. Thompson, which relates to understanding of the public point of view when it comes to LID management projects. Two examples are Hampton Street LID and Summercrest sanitary sewer LID. 4. Robert E. Meyers I have no personnel experience with this firm in LID work, however, their reputation is excellent. They were our second choice for S.W. 72nd Avenue LID when we went through a rather detailed analysis of consulting firms. i t' L� March 10, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISIT N ON SW 72ND AVENUE LID #21 Attached is a summary of street and easement dedications for five (5) parcels on SW 72nd Avenue in LID #21. The City Recorder has the signed dedications and easements. Total cost for these acquisitions is $34,230, of which: (1) $12,850 is the settlement on the Hurt (Ident #17) condemnation; (2) $252 on the Taylor parcel (Ident 431) for partial release administration; (3) $2402 on the McDonald parcel (Ident 944) for 5-foot dedication and utility easement per Council direction; ( (4) $-0- on Pac-Trust-Washington County parcels (Idents #52a and 52c) ; and (5) $17,824 on Sharpe and Assoc. parcel (Ident 959) for 5-foot dedication and utility easement per Council direction. The acquisitions represent a savings of $24,760 over the original estimate on these parcels of $58,990.00. pm (0458A) F- { C i 3 f E F i k i i i i i f b DE HAAS & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS&SURVEYORS SUITE 445-AGC CENTER WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070 9450 S.W. COMMERCE CIRCLE (503) 682-2450 March 4, 1983 Frank A. Currie, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Frank: Attached are the following 72nd Avenue related documents which we are providing for consideration by the Council . Ident 17 (Hurt) a. Street Dedication b. Easement for Utilities With respect to Ident 17, the 5 foot Street Dedication amount is calculated in accordance with our December 21, 1982 recommendation which was subsequently approved by the City Council . Calculation was as follows: 3,025 ft.2 @ $4.00 = $12,100.00 Appraisal & Attorney Fees 750.00 Total $12,850.00 Including $1.00 for the Easement for Utilities , the total amount due would be $12,851.00. The $12,850.00 sum will be disbursed from the courts. The remaining dollar should come directly from the City of Tigard. Ident 31 (Taylor) a. Street Dedication b. Easement for Utilities c. Construction Easement With respect to Ident 31, the 5 foot Street Dedication is essentially a gift, the $250.00 amount being the partial release administration work charged by U.S. National Bank. This compares with an amount Frank A. Currie, P.E. City of Tigard March 4, 1983 Page 2 of $4,700.00 appraised for the prior 10 foot taking and improve- ments. Including $1.00 for the Easement for Utilities and $1.00 for the Construction Easement, the total amount due would be $252.00. Ident 44 (McDonald) a. Street Dedication b. Easement for Utilities c. Construction Easement (need not record) With respect to Ident 44, the 5 foot Street Dedication amount is calculated as follows : 640 ft.2 @ $3.75 = $2,400.00 This compares with an amount of $5,400.00 appraised For the prior 10 foot taking and improvements. Including $1.00 for the Easement for Utilities and $1.00 for the Construction Easement, the total amount due would be $2,402.00. Ident 52a and 52c (PacTrust-Washiaton County) a. Street Dedication The intent of these dedications is to join in the execution of the prior dedications executed by Pacific Realty Trust. These dedications were made at no cost. Because dedication of a gift had always been anticipated, no appraisal had been made. Estimating an appraised value of at least $2.50/ft.2 would make this gift worth $27,210.00. Ident 59 (Sharp & Associates) a. Street Dedication b. Easement for Utilities With respect to Ident 59, the 5 foot Street Dedication amount is calculated as follows : " 4,456 ft.2 @ $4.00 = $17,824.00 Frank A. Currie, P.E. City of Tigard March 4, 1983 Page 3 This compares with an amount of $34,640.00 appraised for the prior 10 foot taking. Including $1.00 for the Easement for Utilities, the total amount due would be $17,825.00. We have lobbied extensively with Sharp & Associates, as illustrated by our attached letter of January 18, 1983, in urging dedication at less than the appraised cost. As evidenced through all our contacts, we do not see any change of further reducing the dedication cost. Sincerely MARLIN J. D HAAS, P.E. MJD/slc Attachments cc: Idents 17, 31, 44, 52a & 52c and 59 I�lili>®14[®6Ellle 11« � ��1�� DE HAAS & ASSOCIA'T'ES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS& SURVEYORS t SUITE 4.25-AGC CENTER WII.SONVILI.E. OREGON 97070 9450 S.W. COMMERCE CIRCLE (503) 682-2450 January 18, 1953 David Reichel Sharp & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 276 Beaverton, Oregon 97075 Dear Dave: Subject to the November 5, 1982 letter (copy attached) , we have been pursuing reduced right-of-way acquisition at great reductions in costs. While the November 5 letter tells of $45,800.00 in savings as of that date, I can now tell you that we can identify firm savings of at least $200,000.00. Wle are confident this figure will rise further, and hope you will be able to assist us in that effort. I We are enclosing the Street Dedication (5 foot strip) and the Easement for Utilities (5 foot strip for $1.00) as related to your property (Ident 59) on the 72nd Avenue project. Returned, unexecuted and now void, are the prior IO foot Street Dedica- tion and Construction Easement that you had executed previously. They may be destroyed. The new 5 font dedication amounts to 4456 ft.2 . At the appraised price of S4 .00/ft.2, the appraised cost of the dedication would amount to $17,824.00. Dave, there have been a number of successive revisions in the scope and assessment methodology since inception of the project. Each change has reduced the amount ultimately to be assessed to Sharp & Associates . The basic changes have been eliminating lighting, sidewalks , landscaped medians and street trees; increase in City of Tigard contributions to $500,000.00; limiting the amount to be assessed to benefitted property owners to $1,500,000.00 plus right-of-way costs exceeding $50,000.00; shifting a direct assessment of $60,000.00 of signals costs to PacTrust and $20,000.00 of railroad crossing protection facilities costs to Pre-Delivery and Southern Pacific Transporation Company; and revising the assessment method to provide further relief from fronting properties. A brief recap of how your assessment has diminished follows: David Reichel Sharp & Associates, Inc. January 18, 1983 Page -2- Right-of-Way Costs Proposal Basic Assessment Exceeding $1,500.00.00 Total Initial $48,758.00 $7,649.04 $56,407.00 2nd 32,480.40 7,649.04 40,129.40 3rd 20,554.39 7,649.04 28,203.39 Final (firi,i)20,554.39 (est. ) 4,590.00 25,244.39 If you will effect proper execution and return these new documents to our office, we will prepare a narrative and forward to the Tigard City Council for approval . Recognizing that many property oiners have recently given right-of-way at no cost and that resultant savings will substantially reduce your final assessment cost, we would urge that you consider dedi- cation for $1.00 or, at least, at less than the appraised price. If you wish to call us after receipt of this letter, we will be happy to further discuss the dedication or any other- questions you may have about the project and about the dedication value. Sincerely, Ile MARL I y HT1: `fl�HAAS, P.E . MJ D;s 1 c Attachments cc_ Ident 59 463 As Amended 3.2. 1 THE CITY SHALL PROHIBIT ANY LAND FORM ALTERATIONS OR DEVELOPMENTS IN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN WHICH WOULD RESULT IN ANY RISE IN ELEVATION OF THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. 3.2.2 THE CITY SHALL: a. PROHIBIT LAND FORM ALTERATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE FLOODWAY*, EXCEPT ALTERATIONS MAY BE ALLOWED WHICH PRESERVE OR ENHANCE THE FUNCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE ZERO-FOOT RISE FLOODWAY*; AND b. PROHIBIT LAND FORM ALTERATIONS OR DEVELOPMENT IN THE FLOODPLAIN* OUTSIDE THE ZERO-FOOT RISE FLOOWDAY* EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: 1. LAND FORM ALTERATIONS SHALL BE ALLOWED WHICH PRESERVE OR ENHANCE THE FUNCTION OF THE ZERO-FOOT RISE FLOODWAY*. 2. LAND FORM ALTERATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE ALLOWED WHERE BOTH SIDES OF THE FLOODPLAIN* ARE DESIGNATED AS EITHER INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP, AND THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN POLICY 3.2.3 CAN BE SATISFIED. 3. LAND FORM ALTERATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE ALLOWED WHERE ONE SIDE OF THE FLOODPLAIN* IS PLANNED FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS: (a) THE LAND FORM ALTERATION OR DEVELOPMENT IS ON LAND DESIGNATED ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USE; (b) THE APPLICANT CAN SHOW THAT ALTERATIONS OR DEVELOPMENT INTO THE FLOODPLAIN* IS REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO BETTER ECONOMIC USE OF THE SITE; (c) THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN POLICY 3.2.3 CAN BE SATISFIED. 3.2.3 WHERE LAND FORM ALTERATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT ARE ALLOWED WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN* OUTSIDE THE ZERO-FOOT RISE FLOODWAY*, THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE: a. THE STREAMFLOW CAPACITY OF THE ZERO-FOOT RISE FLOODWAY* BE MAINTAINED; b. ENGINEERED DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT THERE WILL BE NO DETRIMENTAL UPSTREAM OR DOWNSTREAM CHANGES IN THE FLOODPLAIN* AREA, AND THAT THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE SENSITIVE LANDS SECTION OF THE CODE HAVE BEEN MET (See FIS September 1971); i *The Floodplain and Floodway as defined by the Flood Insurance Study for the City of Tigard dated September 1, 1981. C. THE PLANTING OF AN EVERGREEN BUFFER ON THE COMMERCIAL OR E. INDUSTRIAL LAND ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL LAND WHICH SCREENS THE DEVELOPMENT FROM VIEW BY THE ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL LAND, AND WHICH IS OF SUFFICIENT WIDTH TO BE NOISE ATTENUATING; AND d. THE DEDICATION OF SUFFICIENT OPEN LAND AREA FOR GREENWAY ADJOINING THE FLOODPLAIN* INCLUDING PORTIONS AT A SUITABLE ELEVATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A . PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE PATHWAY WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN* IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED PEDESTRIAN BICYCLE PATHWAY.PLAN. *The Floodplain. and Floodway as. def ined. by , the- Flood .Insurance Study for the City of Tigard dated September 1, 1981. t Ism- -- WAR 04 1983 J. A. PATERSON REALTY CO., INC. CITY OF TIGARD 12700 S. W. Pacific Highway PLANNING DEPT. Tigard, Oregon 97223 March 3 , 1983 (503) 639-2125 City Of Tigard Planning Dept. P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re : Comp Plan Revision &/OR Zoning Ord Changes Relative to Tax Lot 41100 , Map 2S1 10A Dear Sirs : Last fall the subject 100 ' x 4151 , .95 Acre (Approx. 1 acre plat with older single family residence thereon ) was sold to an investor by us for future Apartment construction. The sale is scheduled to close on or before June 1 , 1983 . The potential buyer was recently told by the City ' s Planning Department that he probably could not build apartments on the subject acre. Needless to say, this greatly affects the pending close of the subject sale since the investment character- istics have measureably changed. There is no argument from this quarter with the broad brush application of zoning areas when it comes to drawing out comprehensive plan zoning ! areas since this is recognized as the only practical way to orderly accomplish same. However , the administration of same and changing of zoning ordinances that further hinder use is really not legal. "- In the above case , the Commercial Zoning (C-L) , is appropriate for the area in a general sense--ie. an area back so many feet from the high- way and extending along it--but practically the change from A--2 or �. 12 units per acre to solely_ commercial is not. There are presently apartment on both sides of this property and to subsequently allow only commercial development here , in between, would probably not allow the property owner to do a thing with his property for many, many years . This is what is not legal from an administrative standpoint, denying the most logical use of the property for multiple dwelling use most % appropriate far into the future. It used to be the practice , and still should be, that a lesser use on a zoned piece of property could be allowed as a conditional use. This s should be the case here. You can Comp Plan Zone it C-L, but a lesser use for 12 multiple units per acre should certainly still be allowed as a conditional use if this is necessary where the property has fairly new apartments both to the east and west on Gaarde. Please see that this property' s rights are not violated as above stated. Very truly yours , JJA1 Wan t rson Each Office Is Independently Owned And Operated REALTOR® x' r x< iv Y•Y Yt }l; ,r�J7 t..3 u ti �tr �.*t'� a C ..'# .�•; . z i U = N Lu �71 J. o a ✓ WcD C7 �• y l* - .moi d n - - Be is nj Cl LU • l Com, •.i, i ^ tE i z ;,i �:.. � "•rrJl$—= Y'�.J i �.Bio ��yy .. t ti.._ ,,. 3 co co C=) x N Ci /At��e cn U to �{ cr-' c- 0 S 7 < ¢ o s= d N r � y 4 E[R t ��rw eta tst a®a��®�ow�r Ca1cu / af �'� L4 w. V"b,wiw&-1'-1'C us C, 5-, f 's c -+-( s , d�. S�� of calc 71-L, s e Sid t--t Smear e �• s 3 �8 �p�� ;�� . J eoP �` �?e�ws vrnfou�''S � = L+anZoN�/ viS1'1.-rG-c iu 1�cL�np 10 ZS r�+e1 Susrv� v� ea m'o't-11c�r S S = SfofiJ2 10 4- 4 4-0 S>-L,,c` �Yvrs S'c a !e o vA�o 3 cam, / 0 -3 ,r ` p� aG P�css ti e'�` /s f a avG @ 4 T°.g rd/ Pte+ CG w Jb'v✓S '--!' �vPtfr.s or � vim✓" �, �o �®3 l'��,, LN31 6Lq 63 If ndad� �4;a 1 t• { d P a a l i 1 1 P I i l i I l l i t III lit] I 9 1(TtfT{T�(�i �Ilt �d1�11�J�E rtr�tgr:ll�tli ilr�r�i p{Path ►#I dna ISP a't ill JIf Ili ipl Ipl 1 1 T 7 a 1 1 I 1 7 1 1 1 i 1 � Faa _ NOTE. IF THIS MICROFILMED 4 10 If a2 DRAWING, IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - DRAVIrrTi. oa asz az lz sz sz oz sz zz tz oz s{ ei—[i si-s'r` e•i i ( _zi._ _io___00. e _-._s__ 5_.._.b __E-.. __Z t e �nlYaanlsui�uu6m�iwlriss�_ildilutsan ;� !x►ts..! P1,ui1,�1 51, I„ani ! I i I a 1 a s MA,ttk;.tf -__ AAA tiAArAA9lvA9i.- 7 ,11990' � , ON OR Ilk K mw-- III ft,71 blIV 0 MAMMON ----------- �s r R A rrFli ;II II illags : I rI �! ( P 1 i J S P. e j r.a b _P..� PIt 1 ill1111111(1 i)�jt Iftrljl .Pi Ilr1�I� �7t I I i I n i E � � � i.:. .! ,'J�-i.l I.d-�1 � 1.I I'IR r�IlIl11��I�IPI��lIl11��1.t��'�II�IIIII�I��III01''Ii11111'Ii��t�j�ll�nllsil)In PATE: IF THIS MICROFILMED DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO .I,. THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL �� i 16 .. _. DRAWING. ops sz ez cz s`z sz >z Ez zz r r'z otz , sr al [i 9�--Sr- vi ei ;it it ._o!—s- e- `--Q5 t' c- z rNlllndwullNduNlnullNi�_NI�ltltlla161�1� I I 1�Iftw�1(11�17�ttN�NM �N�IW�IIINI�IM� _.. _ << LAKE OSWEGO QUADRANGLE UNITED STATES OREGON Hr DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR orycV 7.5 MINUTE S GEOLOGICAL .hCC!nl.E,S".(TOPOGRAPHIC) SURVEY ._ 'I, u" j 40' -29 7-1 jr Al, V, -Al rzi-� I - 1� (��! ��l - 9, �Jzm" V, "Nit" J�' 1, 7 .41" Llil d_�- L'1 NSD KIII, 17 Av� 6 ,e IA Y A �9__�sem 44 Th.0�, L_-J'7 V, Cl. 6 Eff. MAS 27'3D" 21 y I , \, "s. No. GO 5� h' Z_ X� 71 R, '4- g Z S, rr 1�1 ' /5 6NINI.......... 211—7— ml .4 A .S ....... xp 10I ".3 L �. 1P4- 3j 17 Vt Or- 2 ; x 45.22-l' 41*22'31" reaves 122", 122.45- "1 42'11" '1 '3D" o Mapped,etlited,and published by the G,,,,,!,,l I—E, SCALE 1124000 ,ISD z I ROAD CI-A CAI"t.T by USGS.NOSINOW USCE.U,d GCf ONSN, SSIFICA71DN qc H — ZVGPv, Topaarepny from aerial pnolpgrapns Cy pnpWgnmmeUic memptls nn 1°0° ° r000 rm° am <°°° s¢D mm rppp rEON A-10-9—h-k-952. `0—I —U. Medi-A — Jli. A FiOd1961 )NTDUR INTERVAL ID FEET R.Ut, J.S.RI,I.fi, State R.� Sh,--ph�d1h.Pilh,d FNOGI .. GIA C G C.UN"T" DEPTI CURIES G�l lSllT �G IN FEET—L11-AIlEl DATUM 1.10, RRIUL,�b Polycmoc L921-0—11—d.— FUll LAKE OSWEGO,GREG. DRAIN'SNALITICAL SUPPLIE � 0.00(d b—,0c...J-1 Nw 1 817 SW.2Gd ODOhl Universal Transverse Mercator aria G—COIPLIES�NAIICNAL ACCURACI 11AN.—S A h— p=hf—0 p,Vb.','ph, N4522.5—WI2237.5/7.5 FORILAWOREGON .10, b- FOR SALE By U.S.CEOWGICAL SUITIEY.DENVER.COLORADO 80225.OR RESTON.VIRGINIA 22092 Vkll 1 S70 111 197 5 Th,,llp NNE lh— —1 503'277-1 F R,—I,, a,1I, —b..II zh... A raLCEN 01=118"G T.F.—PhIC MAPS AnD Sl...IS E A01—E ON REQUEST PHO OIEVIECD 1970—1975 F.- d I—III,,, d.—�blld 11 11 ...... NW AN 1.11 1 _SERIES NOTE: IF 2 3 4 5 TNIS MICROFI�D 7 a 8 (o it 12 LESS CLEAR TUN Z NOT IS IT IS DUE TO G INE QUALITY I ORIGINAL 'NO. OE Ga -02 -42--o-Z__%2_ -012 EZ ZZ lz OZ of 91 LI 91 SI 6.1 el al if 01 6 0 1 9 s ♦ c Z I- 24 M AR, H 1 71,1990 ®3 14 83 1 MA +l+jCl3 +i+j+1' ataiLfa afa att eta ata a!t a afto aj7 t a i at fIT ata a �a �m IlIrl ��aft�a fa� t �rT� f a i. �, i � t��a)atiiafj�tai+f+�+t+i+eaEas�l+l+�+ry+a+�+taj+!'`l+t+j+l+'+I+iN+�+l+j+l+�+l+i+aa •. NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED - - .. .t.. _ 2 __ _ __3 - 4 S - 6 7 9 0 fl t2 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL ? 81_ -5 �� DRAWING. Qg 6z e2 'Z az �EZ zl�alaa�a iOJajalllZ _tt '! t3 tl it ft�KU--9f— laa#aataii9ei zl.. ..5� _0�.__6 Lel- 1-_--9. —.. cam----6 ----£..._.z f zrsa au6uL�tuduLa�NatuaL a±lua�aala j»rt4aaN� L.I....I....1. 16 x __� _ _ STA N.Tay� N N :'IC•MFORMAT)0N ADDED TO P6-M qlI �J /� r \ IE) LLJ MAF ON SONE 2,H81 I\ECDRD .Or- SURVEY (WN J SV Aurr rsRn.aa•,<5.•Tz89 _ _ I I-cLrvl Htuas-r 1 1 - 1UIT41N "VJEST POFLTLAND HEIGHTS' m�89'ST'E, LL (/) , :•..• _ FDR'./-'FRAL VME L.MALL"AUD 0.3'.13 IWL. I 1 1 - - OU 7RAL75 OF LAUD LOCATED IN TME 5.E.1/14 SEG,3LR, W 1^-35 m - �,�•:r-seYr/':/Vii- TIS. R.1 W. M•ID THE N.E.'/4 SL.i. T.ZS. R.I VU-11 M j W.M•I WASHINGTON COUMTHI OCErnDIJ c } z 4 ___ I 5URV£VED My AAJD`R I-A21S GA-SOGIATCS x1 i F3FtjG_K Z3 IJNRRATNE -- U.2,77S.W.CANVONDRIV£ FILE 61592 a4 LAKE OSWCraD O¢•. 9'705'-1 (SOT SOFTY-4ET ARU) FROM THMUE E ON MU7FD S UUD AND HELD F 35 '-srn Hn150 0.S NOTEOI S HAVE ESTASU"CD TME MATE ATE MARCH •RAN 7,,Go 0, Z4/ IR$! R1 PDSMOUS OF TME FOLLOW1Lr- DESC.RImEm Q 5.95 593°Srw •/ MALL TRACTS \ - 9-� DE=P40r- 174 PA6,C 162 In D® BLDIL 003 PALE '(lot sw HU— MW ROD1. 767 PAbE 157 DEED BOD¢ ITT PALE SL4I-c1 ITL W SOU L GiE•LN-SBS DEED BOOK 7b7 PA&C 157 DETAIL L E® SWIG 777 PALE Z8S t0 I ® I I ® O SGAIEIS SOe DEED 5WV 14tH M&F- IZO LSED BOOK 903 PALfr lfdT DEED FEE NO R9O IL59n 1 I 10 D® FEE ND 800IXo15°1 DEED FEE NO 000371.14 DEFD FIX NO =4S-Mt, DEED FEE WOLa E5p73736Z _- - - _ - /s•x.➢/➢C _ _I _ _ -_ _ - -- - ORE[SDM DEPART•MENTOFTRN•1513].2T'A710U Fp 5/g•r,Jmp F'O.qrR SPIN£ FILE UUMREAS: S154D j 50350+� S.IU.LLIIJT�N e-- --7 - a 51591 G=(PLAT 3_d) FU S.b'S RLD -ip s/0T2 R>pJ �, FD 12•I.M9E I f T TT T—--- r',I I— rT77�j7 I I 1 111..IsKsIr.IT181� 1,.1Iz171yISIL171e1 112I3Iy15141,IBI LEvcW D I I I I I I I id I` I I I I I I I I I I I I U.w LOR-IOL'3z18e IL o sEr 5ii•:3arRoueoD111 1 L I_ � I� I I I L 1 L I I 1� J, O FWNDAS3{IO .L D u.E.lOR.Im IY Rc 1L N�E.0IR.OF lD'FfI�RK IY (wl ens/➢c,%r$ ...=��`�1�' _ i y I � nLr, klsso. [3 gi -.i `�_I- -- ��14 �- 'I 4.W lOR 10rIV1 RKIL `J ;V- _ (BK P03/➢v%1) - - - 89^STeE YLL •8•YS+9V.TL -I Z12 IL g` ii I I N.W.lOR.GF LOT tT RHl4 REGI'- 'i'La / {'N'L•S 1L3.50 1-'--77}-- - \$n 13 � ii Ou WLT.L14EOF LL.S� t 1' O i •Z"_5851Y..o]-P6 Sl> PR .S ONAl. •u.drSrE: - �(u �a. - '-T -- - l Sd i•- -- If -. 1 L'VD S VEYO N EY- - zw.mRpFLprlEs/RKP-1 '' (BIA873PGa4LI) 8 N L3T33 egRy.VN�Vi fel �' �_"-p�•� L}-. I 7v.48 I L9 I I u.w.MU LDT4z�'4113KW Onix uG ON `. D AIET7 I� 'y Y•1 VAI R E167m5 N.8'PST'E f--- A•.•c➢Da,lzo-1s Y _ I' }Y� 7 ,y 31% LIVE LE 4G.S!24-585 ANDREW J.PARIS JR •- I __ y.3 I ' d �y\�. -. .+s•� .LL I--'2_A .g. - i (as m-➢aRS) 289 _•�>- rozm 0'Z ,g IL- 509,•9w :'\o T,�� 'e �-'r E- .N.B9°5]"E"5/9.92(PUfr 520)•__�___s___' 5.�1.DARTMOUTH I ' PLAT v.. I 1 ps'$ 1 I .I ( II I�'�'P n Tz z3$y-meE.iae.oF for z4l atw •AE(.34 T.Ifa.Ri W. __ _.- -_:".JJ'I�1-- \M Oyyy , n •��. a�—I I 114 I I I F L l a DAFnMIM __ _ — 5$ Ij g1, a s" m ZvauTlw-rav). t >n47 [).S.T3 INL. A1IbLE q�lur wSpNKEK1.T g,>6 llII 1 gR li +k FILE�5O350 �i 5.89°5]'W. UUE AF GLSw2y___ �. 4BI F0.£->-�ly A � �°�raa��° S.E.aR.c➢10:10, / � .� _ --�' L I/o031950FT+l.NET(rc��'+.ra F' I IB- 3 2.T 113 (RR fi�3➢b°.u)- /G (F�, 4..E.OR IOTB gK17 �I p�E h - d I d T_�- NI✓Y��u.E•mR A'DEETS&(n� ti ¢ 4 ➢V 767 3 «roL 19 mt-'pFI f.° SF,o fD.sis•x.Roo Fnlc,Hc I �P 3i 1J IY SI e Np r9,2 ryl 3 _=Q Mu/AR.GF Bk-IB I \ �.L ILL-1181 II IL I31M SIL tl9 ` I�` I I r S fl°54'45'W,359.86 DETAIL 'A DETAfL'6" � I �n�--�- •- 3° FD�SAS'2.R.FLR THE RALE , •yaL£1•=I _ � '= 9 I--R -}--�- -i H S.E.Gpi.DFim8 RK111 OF Off 34 I I 3y- 119 I (8K TTZ/, LE15I /iKLEL•Y O➢FEE �b �`- _ _ I— -- —1- -i Iy I 075.1107750) 1dD04S78b T-g 18` 1t )3 -I - 'SEAES/8•L.RODRIO611- . ROF LOT4,BL 1641 Mw.taa aF DEED' - 1 b aS•19__ - tW TTL/FIVE ZZS-. FD.S!d•x.AAD FARTHE --) 1- ) p I � .W.mROF IOf 1519H 10 I B9°roSTp'^ TO ^ (P.5.11•afA, _� _ zz tz LAS cs s zs Ls I � CfSK TY4 PG I1D� � �=7-IE3 \O ze —1 -pD+ SFE Di WIL A`I r 1 p____l •1 I-- --�- z't = If; z7 5 @T7 FTTTITTT1 IIcF K Ss zz 15`5 iS i5 25 � lFS.9414) \1\ ` p, a'ID L I IL � 1x5 1141 � 119 ).')IL I ll.I ti 2Y 125 1141 � .a 9 3z u I u.w tdi COT 1,Pxz3 I\I ' n i III 1 m I I I I I I I 11 I _q I'AA1�..1 I`,^` Iz 33 ,�, S.W. E LIVI H L)RST ST.(gtA S`�I`4 Sm AMAE�wTFOp 7T�nB ea:b,➢4 3LY SI b I _ e 3 3z 1A r. ML—ENT IS" T 7 T T 1 - - - - - - - -I p 1Y 31 w IO I EF4EMEIlr-SALL IDI As* M 15 3o y 0-N MI LFTRgNSITICAIyN. P III L 31 U IQL 416K Z3 1 5.89°58.42•W j5973. a0 IT _ zs N I > I (FSEW BmDl v4, '.Y0 _ 9V.i'S•. k ti -. - - - --�/+��•. I '� 3[ALE I•c�. 4 18 = LT Cm Nzn3) I 81 1J I 4n u l ]fl m 9 Lz 2i LV 25 14 I ` ROF SSW • I (• I F---- _� 1 (FEE Up YIO1K9747 •- ZOO - ZI I \ `81 I v I—F7+T TT; LS m I 0 LL LS I I I I I 0° I i I I FD. 1LM 1 . T`IFILAL ELOLK wtrmiu I I Q-,F R/R!FIRE fqC 9 II1pg5EGTIGI I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rI (b111 N,5.YY 00 I I LLj11111� —1 ___ ___ —� I_ IIwEST PORTLAND NEIGI-ITS - - - - -' '- - el : 5.W.FRAfJKLI1Q :ST.. aAT ��.- :._— ---- -- ➢R Al -__-1 _FDRRSE gR 4•L (rLAT c*•).._ s.a T•n'w szo.Ds .... .. .. __ _..._.. --- -- - - — xwrEHZEcnpu I � �..- - I I res.19To3> - I I -_ w �III 111I Ill I1Jill � 11 11111 1 I1 �IImllliIIII111nIll1111I111IIIIIIII1 11 111111111111111II!! pill 1 1,141'1,1,1.11 J�I OTE: IFTHISKICWFIHD Z 3 4 5 a 8 0 O 11111111111UI11 4, _... _-..... -- ....:..:. DOif W IS LESS CLEAR THMI THIS HOTIDE,n is DLE To TIE DUALITY OF T1E WIGINAL _...--_V2--ca-22-12_ OE 82 82 L2 bZ L2 _'_�� OZ8I� 81��' LI 9I1- L1�I bl EI ZI II OI 6 Y L 9 L b E Z nRlunluuluul nlnnlwl�wdmlllmLR1I1N1�1LG1tlIL&YI�II)BBWYUOm+u��uylMB�j�IBJNUIWW�BlI11�ILIInn�L� L111LI�un MARru IF17 ,A �v^ )JB INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 U.S.A. (503) 639-2900 Fz nvj 25, 7983 Dajv�T,� Fz&uiczr-�c 28, 7983 Eo cs & tcus i n za jy-,&r-t .to 4e daLi vzn e-rl to Caun ciX �ovz Courzr.LL, neati_rzrz on 1Var.-ch 2, 7983 CL&4 Caurzoi_t CL6, o-' T it az .(;annilzn. lU.er:czzt�z.nnt 12755 S. tl. /L'zh Tir w, -1, &Lc:-an 97223 tle have upst Zecmel that Lanz&zarulz Fal?-d, 3n-c- thaaarh datcc FRI-iac,uj 9, 1983 addrz.,- . ed .to CLtrr Caun ci_t, Ci ti c-n Tix:anas a- 2, hzh�d .thct .the hznd zu-,z-wun2-ul t .tJzei,L d en�eizah i��, zvlzicrz i a ��v�zz oof-'entzz ozvr l 1713, Ar- on the n x LM and Lj m t, .-e zh2e -arl to C-5 zon irz`a. The Ci tes a;. �I'.irr�zc' n evert adv"i z ed az o-o .thin n ec..�Lea-t rrh.irh .iz thl wzeaaan �'`^ nat hall-z-a ,. 1< thi.d tC'JL zo neP ' : t'nt tJ, .r-5 tls 1:tr hou-s etm cjwnr-e-z an-c! zcna.id -z tho-t .che ALL.c-a .irzo" Ta.;-- L.at6�hav �r:rz t crus ed irz car��urz�t ion z ri�i�z t'ze Fanc_' Dea, 7 970 z re "lh that the-6z Tax Laid and ^o z.ti_an o� :� ect S ,z�s a_fonr. rwf z tJk A;erra-uz%rzr Tax Lata and pa,-,% on d aP Vaca_c J S.trtl.,f, oz�zetr µ z !��-J, Jnr. 4 e zoized G5. LL'�S TC Ll u:'�l r: :.i: FORD, J anc' p^,zn_vipzzd .ta r'+ �rzdo Fozd arzc_' Jet att Ford Ca. (Lcfazzed 4&,ce 7970) tiap 1 S 1 36 DJ 4500 F1_ 5000 P,_CC 5700 5800 Plalltzan Aap2S7 7A, 700 -!—U (FanneA- j 700, 700, 300) 7700 1pantion iXT L%'!SSD TO LIL.'a'i, :/C Fu/PJ, rad 1 S 7 36 DD 11-800 (J-z Tufy�aae�s Eert 'urt,b a.a a .,tL° fetaZen ;.�a�.vzt�z .eecza.e�.-' .to :�.erz(rnahua a. arici)(vzc�untr� G-zuwzed .�.�z i 'zrj- mrz�, ZILV Z":cn 0Z T 5800 lean a ao"t -t��ICr'"i a Fond, 3ar- iiap2S7 7fu11 1400 7307. (Fawvze�z(�-, a! 1300) 1200 (i:ar r a.C4a Zrzt•�u Wizen 5400 and aXzo &zczcrrl� I/act,=ted. S. tJ. Unlzc�at 1700 alt i on rzo t Lan rrrznrz Fant✓, Jn c. (7700 wunz ;_o�r,,ze,L�t 7500, 7600, 7700) fLf,C o?_ ilze cava nc rzcrl Tam Lobs a..°..a,-r, "L7:iz .thoz.e as Pc' .tv Fard L Pn e /�� and •arzed G2 an p 2i, 7967 ("oo,4 11-0 Par, - 23 0 eto✓zerrt r?esatic n u 04zZela 67-350. e ;- Cori:ia�r orzerze s� -e) wwee-z O.iS INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND,OREGON 97223 U.S.A. (503) 539-2900 mmnziL Page Z f &u=4j& 25, 1.983 (D" �YfD �: id a.Lt of.t&e Azrld zpeC4.i,ed .crr .thi 4 .l.etJL and ot+PLed D;B, Jnr and T. L. 57.00, Azam 7 t 36 DD mm ed 4 G. L. .1.e- zMed G-5. it that aLt t!r of .L,wLY.to Land i," Foal, Jac. &e zarr ed .the zaxe a"Z L at 400 uAi.ch- Z& twxLed Z9 FD d L as a.en.a and 17evzZgl Pn.t and .Lenz ed .to Landma h Fond, Inc, " .the .ts w .Lenz u a:r a .tied .toyztnea. 3.t.Za oum .that .the rww x -trc =m-ed � DA, jn c, and Zeazed toa A=d c1l,a f-eA Atp 4a cru th .that & � Z.U21973 r=uZd came undem .the tame ,.6 C&uzz as .the jw�� .owned .+ Fx d Lamaze and 17.ev J �� .the e .that 17eLU Faced Gomiaang, A.Q�ondo Fond, and Landmahk F um.th Dx13, 3nc. .ice .ti-ed .tu .the tea:aa that DzZ Ba.Lt Fond CDMpan 4 -U,/ o Fond and LandnavJa Fond hae had uaA Fond Leat i and Aevatc p cent. 3a zummvruV, uw-Z of ieve .tete z ming zhang e .z a .1Laa4oral-ty, paad tnt a"- .the fvs menti n ed is ..hi z .get tam Aaced i�u .the fame zzn.=g and z arh A e the .tee we aah that .the Q4 Counr e L adpt the zhang a at the n.Qxt meeUA94 7-� a.LLthf, isruo Le:�t m p Lt i rxn ed irs #hi.a .mit ten, does nat necewe the aaen a G5 zrxa i , -then 17;3, 3NC. �� V.ace�nea.ident 6ZB.- . ?o Fo e-D T'/9 JC Z a r ,5;z&->7 _ ' a v LLAVE S!rs� 3 _ MAP zs f '1AA 1®1on �� I � tv in as CD cril L 1 Nl �� 001 L ,. l p ✓oj �00 p 1 ' � Y•O/CL Yif/Sti ' r OOi N _ (n mT t�pp pp N I J r,., ✓ v, A w ® S.W. 70 th A ' N N co B C 1668 CR. 1544(60') C.R. 1522 S.W. 69th aw.?,wj,-�.=iw.•._... mo Baq./544 m � _ !v m WD 0 wpm _ ,` A D a b / r32 65()7 79 42311 7 � CC 4!•006 S.W. 68th AVE 82/4667 -- — ^C41 144 .:C C N v m o N o m , n � m 673/412 W. N 67th ® AVE. m ® BC 166m � 340/a2 7 � ® 0 !� D _.�'-.:7=•i.�ar,+-tee �aOV �; r� �1 y O - .0 A � N�A� r. S Cn o a cry m k ' UL ®N �► E S.W. '" 66th AVE. 1 BALDOCK FREEWAY ® ' !M 6500 BC 1666 A. J CO a o d ®2 I O J zO o c CD M CO's r � is r F 25, 7983 2.9, 1983 ,eo L -inc.L' -mica .Ln pacJ---t .ta c c%ri cry r1 .to Cameo 1v�c Cour c i.t r.ace d r� arz f ia4-ch 2, 1983 �� Caz�fzci�L' C.�u� a% Tis:afzc:' 72755 S. U. :lzh Ttran4 Cn-cLaa 97223 J lav,- ,uj Zeaed tjzc_t Fa zc, Jnc. anal Fend Jcrl&-A have A.er�.ted .that t.%ze vazazt .land Lata-arl 66fh cnr'' 68th this .uz .thr Tn ian eps c sv 4.,- za ze cJzani-ccl f/ o z C' .ta G5. J an .trt tAc zar.tn-7 wrz G' to C-5 a-6 .tan.n, a-s =4 Tax L.a t 5700, f;e,Z 1 S 7 36 v[7, .i-6 � o rJK�ze ec! J-o /sou da nat .chary--e the zanuzr_ on r.✓: Tc-:�- Lot 5700 to C-5, tAen G. L. ?•ALL r Ck U 1 Geology Kxi na Setting _ The project crosses the western slope of Mt. Sylvania. Elevations on the freeway portion of the project rise from about 250 feet above mean sea level at the south end to about 500 feet a.m.s.l . at the north end, making an overall gradient of three percent. The maximum gradient, 5.8 percent, lies northeasterly 71 from "lorth Tiqard Interchange. Hill slopes in the project area are gentle to moderate except for those of the steep-sided gully formed by the unnamed drainage which crosses the project. Exploratory drilling along the project indicates a very irregular soil zone from 0 to 21 feet or more deep. Underlying this are the relatively thin flows of Boring Lava basalt, which forms the bedrock throughout the project. The rock is weathered locally to depths of 46 feet or more. No faults or other geoloccur in the project area. The typical soils in the project area are clayey to sandy silt and ; silty clays varying from fine textured to rocky. The soil chosen for the base F design is a gravelly sandy silt generally present in the construction zone. Granular material in the form of rocky soil and soft weathered lava rock may be expected in the deeper cut sections throughout most of the project. The lava rock indicates a very irregular rock profile. Water well logs indicate that the static ground water levels in the project area are well below the freeway construction depths. It is likely, however, that isolated zones of perched ground water occur in the project area, ` and that they contribute to the surface water runoff. VIII-11 i i- BIBLIOGRAPHY 1 . Franklin, Jerry and C. T. Dyrness. 1973. Natural- Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. U.S.D.A. , Forest Service General-Technical Report PNW-8. pp. 209-231 . 2. Ingles, L. C. 1965. Mammals of the Pacific States. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. `506 pages. 3. Martin, A. C. , H. S. Zim,`and A. L. Nelson. 1951 . American Wildlife and Plants. New York: Dover,.\Publications. 500 pages. 4. Randall , W. R. and R. F. Keni`ston. 1968. Manual of Oregon Trees and Shrubs. Revised edition. Corvallis,\Oregon. OSU Badstores, Inc. 277 pages. 5. Stebbins, R. C. 1954. Amphibians and Reptiles of Western North America. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. 35 6 pages. _ 6. Smith, R. L. 1966. Ecolo and Field Biology. New York: Harper and Row. 686 pages. 7. U.S.D.A. , Soil Conservation Service. 1 70. Preserving Natural Vegetation. 7-L-14000-232/htev. May, 1970. ` 8.�. . Blaser, R. E.-`and W. H. McKee, Jr. Regeneration of Wood Ve etation Alo_ n�� Roadsides / Highway Research Record Number Highway Research Board. Wash - , 1967. 9. Dyrness, C. T. , Jerry F. Franklin, Chris Maser, St ton A. Cook, James D. Hall , and Glenda Faxon. 1975. Research NaturalI ea Needs in the Pacific Northwest. Pacific Northwest Forest and' Range Experiment Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Portland, Oregon. S l rr -E4- IN 1 - Impacts Alternative 1 involves no construction and therefore no direct qeo- logic impacts. This alternative would continue use of a drainage system which is becoming inadequate for increasing surface water runoff created by urbani- zation of the area. As a result seasonal nondina of water would continue. No geologic hazards are known to occur in the oroject area and no unusual construction problems are anticipated. Several vet areas located in the northern half of the project will require draining before construction proceeds. Erosion control is discussed under water nuality and biologic impacts . For a full discussion see the Geology Technical Report. Estimates of material required, excavation and embankment quantities are shown below. Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Surfacing Aggregates ---- 55,000 cu.vd. 45,000 cu.yd. Excavation ---- 155,300 cu.vd. 121 ,000 cu.yd. Embankment ---- 151 ,600 cu.yd. 128,800 cu.vd. F No state-owned material source exists in the area and it is probable that the choice of a suitable source will be the responsibility of the contrac- tor. An analysis of likely commercial sources is contained in Table IV-1 of the Geology Technical Report. Commercial sources are regulated by the state and \ l -65- • i contractor-supplied sources are governed by subsection 106.05 (as supplemented) of Oregon Transportation Commission Standard Specifications for Highway Construction to insure proper treatment and reclamation of the source. No waste sites outside the project limits are required. l : 1 :I _J ram -66- I i cC N s- E �- a1 r S- S- > 0- > a) O c L S.. U >. Vf .I.� ..0 O •�- OJ .� cr ^ r6 Z7 O •r 04-) 0 U S U C C () 4- U U p U 3 +-) 4) i cC to = = Q- O /n In ..0 t� a = '0 i Q) a--) 'r 4 U p 4J •y, 4J CM c 7 C O y ¢ Ln C O U 0 a)m + U -0 'C cnO N 0 p d s > O CD-r U C N r E �--� .r. Q.I..i aJ M r6 r fCS 'p r .�..� E •r Cn C i •r C r C) a 'o �-+ 3 � •.- +� 3•� C� cn 3 'mil � 0 0 � O''•- r ,U y F- -0 C N O_ i b ,a .� to Q N a) •� O N w i +-+ U E i a•V U r O C 4- O i t O RS m r 'n d C) C O O U 0 (v .0 N c0 4-J, 4- i a) 0.-0 r 0In .c_a 0 Q '0 i U 4-.) a to C m a)-0 'a O tO 0 — ' cp a) =3 c 'J �O i p tp rp -p y aj l O In O C � (! 4-J 0 •r S_ N O i C Oro In -0 -0 -0 --m C O U aj . I .0 i C O C — a) O p U > r '-+ N C O C C 0Z N o =3 rp p *-� O m + i (2) Q i-) N p O RY 4--) ^� > a) U d' +J O cn C Ln r C • a) '--• r U C rp co r () aJ d 4-) N =3 O r p LLL ra E o4- -- U a cn 3 o aaj N O rT CL O i a.. U I >> > O0 i � _ Cl-� �[ o �' a� fn C) •r 0 N •r r d i g 4J U r N S_ to 4_ U p rp U T7 O i-0 co•r 0 •U rif Z > _ O O U - Q > N c0 4J 4- U coin O i= OM y V•-• > icen ¢ -0 i c6 a) = C d X d 0 � +-� O c'0 w O Q d i EE -0 a� a) +-3 O i d-•7 N N N r -0 E a aJ R ai •� c0 a) ... O O +� CL i O'0 to r 0 O - to O •'- U U S- a) rts o m + O O O S.O.. -O' 0 i-� 4-J z Z Z 'O •- M tA to C'0 i 1= C -ti•� O O -0 a) 00cu Ln a U d >1'U6 O Q ow r r E •N oCO f aii o 3 O Cl- > En 0 C a) U 11 "0 R3 O O b C a7 d H � O r r O 'N S- 0 O 4w cu 4J 4.1 L°3 -67- Hydrology and Water Quality Existing Setting The oro,ject corridor crosses the west slone of Mt. Sylvania which is drained by a network of tributaries to the Tualatin River, including Fanno Creek. Of the several creeks that drain the project area, only one unnamed intermittent stream is crossed by the proposed project. s Fanno Creek has experienced an alteration of its hydrologic character- istics in recent years as the land use in the watershed has changed from predomi- nantly rural/suburban to urban/light industrial . Ground surface being covered <� with impermeable surfaces such as roads and houses has led to increased surface water runoff. In addition, filling on the flood plain has decreased flood stor- age. The resulting hydraulic characteristics are typified by fast rises immedi- ately after heavy rains which crest shortly after rainfall ceases . These char- acteristics can be expected to intensify as the area is further developed. The water quality of these streams has deteriorated as the rate of development has increased. Stream quality is characterized by lots flows most of the year, elevated fecal coliform levels, low dissolved oxygen concentrations , moderate pH, moderate to high temperature, moderate total alkalinity and hardness ,✓ levels , and by very high nutrient levels. In recent years conditions appear to be improvina as sewage treatment plants are installed and treatment methods up- graded. Additionally, turbidity caused by erosion has been a problem throughout much of the Tualatin River system. In general , the quality of these streams can be considered fair to poor in terms of their suitability for aquatic life. There are no salmonoid fish species such as salmon and trout present in the Fanno Creek system. Aquatic WINE WX -G3- biota present are mostly in the form of snecies tolerant to less than ideal environmental conditions. TImpacts Alternative 1 would have no effect on flood flows and flood storaa�, around water contamination, or erosion from cut and fill slopes . However, con- tinuing land develonment in the watershed will increase surface runoff, taxing the capacity of the existing drainage system. Alternatives 2 and 3 would have minor imnacts on the Fanno Creek fsystem. Temporary, moderate to severe disturbance •!ould occur in the Fanno Creek tributary which crosses Interstate 5, but this stream in not a highly productive part of the watershed. The disturbance would result from rechannel- ization in the headwater area and random fill of the old bed to redirect runoff waters to the inlet of a new larger culvert which will replace the existing 30-inch culvert. The new culvert will be combined with holding ponds to regulate ' flog to the same rate as the existing system. Additionally, 17.2 acres (Alternative 2) would be exposed as a con- sequence of roadway construction. Heavy precipitation and the oresence of highly erodable soils would present a potential erosion problem. Mitigative measures which would be emoioyed include seeding and mulchina, and the place- ment of hay bales to act as filters and energy dissinators at the base of fill slopes and on the west side of the random fill . Alternative 3 differs from Alternative 2 only in magnitude. The area paved would be less by 2.3 acres , slightly lessening the surface runoff and onlv 7.6 acres of cut and fill slopes would be exnosed to erosive forces . The miti - gative measures employed would be the same as those used in Alternative 2. l— -b9- L rno 4- b� aE ,o S.- V >1 c a) �-- U n i > 0' .0 j - 4J d S- s- 3 +� in O O -0 • i- t� N U rC O to 4- j O CO N d 0 V O CL) 4-3 C N i M-0 •i-) ro O a -0 a) � v4- E N co + O r r > O•O •r0 O L N b N ro +) c 3 4- p S.- C > S- to o +� N >� >> O O to r 0 Lnd T i 0 L 4-) C -0 O ro i-) r S-S- ro N •r C S-.- - d (1) S- .'- ro'O ro C N +.1 4 N t -0 > > O O •r L O C 4) ro Q 0• S- .0 U ••- cn O C O 0— F= rF= U L •i-) to+J ro > N C = O ro 0) 0-1-- a) •, r •b) -i-) N r 0•4-3 4-3 .Q-0 cu i C i-) 4.) 4J 4-•) ..0 O S• ro i N O U 4- •r O O C L C 0' tv ro U rn 0 L Ln U ro cu �r 4 t rn o 0 3 �, L} d) 0 -0 r- N U)-0 i-) C = C) r C r6 co ro 0 rO 4) O r6 S- = 'O 4- r N 4J 1r O rn a U iO C O 44---• E E D i) N C -Oa M 3 4- O N rn w rts -0 C) i d -0 Ca.. a C:) i•) C -0 r 4) Q: r- .r r t0 _ d Q N y, � 4! C •r r rn L d +) C CO U ro i- to Ln •r C C •r > Q) i ro-0. ro C O 4- Q > O O •rL O•r N O• L -0 U — N C4- N G U i +) O N O F-- N C 0 O to S- C-) U F- '.- 4) 4-) tV d L O H r r .0 •U S- ;.) r0 - rn (p Q) U O C N C 4- a) a- O N •Or T C C) 4- L- 4-) +) N N a) N O > r6 O ca + 4) i 'O'O 0> > O to r6•r co tn 4-3 a•) Z � N C "0 L 'O i (U6 U N -O O U V >> t0 C Gv a-0 d a-) r C 0 Lo r U)O 0 r •r O i Ln E r •r a Q CU CD 0 tz 4-1N r0 O C) O L O O S•_ +) E O r C Q) U S- d N •r 4.) C O +� "0 r0 C d y to L O V ro C 4- �. N O •If -0X L N > N 0 M 4- i 4-) 4-3 t - va to Otm O N i 3 3 - r -70- Bi of ogy C Existing Setting A 2000-foot wide corridor bordering Interstate 5 between South Tigard _ Interchange and Porth Tigard Interchange was adopted as the study area for bio- logical impacts. Land use within the corridor varies from farm land to multi- story office buildings. 1 The intrinsic qualities of the wildlife habitat found in the undevel- oped areas which are scattered throughout the corridor do not differ markedly from brush, woodland or grassland habitat which exists throughout the lower Willamette Valley. The number of species of wildlife which reside in the corridor is severely limited by habitat parcel size and the urban nature of the surroundings and consists mainly of birds, small mammals, reptiles and iamphibians which have limited home range requirements. Natural woodlands usually occur in closed canopy stands of varying size, the largest of these being about 15 acres in area. These woodlands are usually dense and are most frequently dominated by Oregon white oak or Oregon l ash with lesser amounts of Bigleaf maple, Red alder, Douglas fir, or Western red cedar. Suburban lawns , gardens and office parks are often of a woodland nature and those adjacent to natural woodlands are usually beneficial to 4 _ songbirds. Brush occupies only 5% of the land in the corridor but when adjacent to woodland, provides an important food source and cover for species of grassy areas. Grasslands occur throughout the corridor, the larger being associated with farms, school yards, and roadside right of way. Although potentially very productive, mowing limits their potential food productivity and cover l TABLE 7 SUMMARY OF HABITAT LOSS AND CHANGE BY HABITAT TYPE -----------Acreages--------------------- Alternative TOTAL woodlands Brush Grassland Res./Ind. 1 (No-Build) 0 0 0 0 2 (With Haines Inter- section) a. Long Term Loss 15.2 9.7 0.6 1.3 3.6 � b. Short-Term Loss - y Due to Clearing 19.8 * 1.7 4.9 13.2 1 c. Medium-Term (5-15 years) Reduction in 1.7 0 0 Habitat Complexity 1.7 0 3 (WithoutHaines Intersection) a. Long Term Loss 8.3 4.4 0.4 0.9 2.6 b. Short Term Loss Due to Clearing 7.7 * 0.7 1.9 5.1 c. Medium Term Reduction in Habitat Complexity .07 0 0.7 0 0 'kLoss is already considered as long-term loss. Jill r- -72- r value. However, seasonal use by birds and small mammals is still high because of the presence of large insect populations. There are no state or federal "threatened or endangered" species of l wildlife in the study area nor are there now any habitat features which would l � be critical to these species. At this writing, there is no official , finalized "threatened or endangered flora" listing. However, seven species of plants which appeared to be of a type listed on the proposed list were verified by Oregon State University as not of these species. ImIRacts :< In general , the changes which will occur have local significance but are not significant to the wildlife resource of the county, state, or nation. Even if no highway construction occurs much the same impacts are expected as { 4 the result of future development of surrounding land. Highway changes are only t expected to influence hoar quickly this development takes place. r Alternative 1 has the least impact on wildlife of the three alterna- tives. No habitat would be changed or paved. No pavement would be obliterated. L Stimuli for urbanization of adjacent habitat would be least, especially if the i Baines Interchange were closed. The advantage to wildlife is one of time; con- ditions for wildlife are expected to become worse as the area develops to the { degree for which it is planned. See Table 7. Alternative 2 would have the greatest impact on wildlife of the three 1 E 1 <_ alternatives. Approximately 4.7 acres of existing habitat will be paved over i which would result in a direct long-term irreversible loss. Approximately 17.2 6 "- % additional acres would be cleared and then revegetated of which 4.7 acres would 4 go milli Ti -73- experience long-term loss due to a qualitative reduction of habitat character- istics , haracter-istics , 1 .1 acres would sustain a mediun-term loss due to a qualitative reduction ` in habitat characteristics where grassland replaces brush, and short-term loss 1 would occur on 11 .4 acres where grassland replaces grassland or residential habitat. Alternative 2 which includes improvement to the Haines Intersection is expected to stimulate the planned development of the adjacent lands more than Alternatives 1 or 3. In so doing, it would have the most adverse effect of the alternatives on existing wildlife. Alternative 3 is of approximately one-half of the magnitude of Alter- native 2. In terms of habitat commitnents the proportion of long-term commit- ments to total commitments is higher than for Alternative 2. Approximately 5.7 acres of existing habitat would be committed on a long-term basis (5250 of the total area) of which 3.G acres would be paved over and 2.1 acres would undergo + ) long-term degradation of existing habitat characteristics. The remainder (except J for 4501 brush) would undergo a short-term loss of productivity (approximately 2 years). This alternative will probably have little influence on the rate of - � growth of adjacent areas. For a complete discussion refer to the economic impact section to which the relative influence of sewage lines versus high':3y access on urban development are compared. The only way to offset this type of chronic loss of habitat, habitat quality, and time is to minimize or mitigate each loss as it occurs, realizing that the significance of an impact cannot always be judged within the limits of a single project. Measures to minimize the loss of wildlife habitat are aimed at restoring a degree of habitat variety and provide food and cover as quickly as possible to open land in the construction zone. A wide variety of songbirds would benefit if small trees and shrubs were planted in clumps along the highway,. rM 1 -74- I . Grasses planted for their ability to control erosion could also serve as a food source. These measures are equally applicable to Alternatives 2 and 3; no mitigation is considered necessary for Alternative 1 . t _ t . i � r t Q�fQ®IQQAHIQrQQ�ffie!l�9Q��l�,! �J�lQQ! —75- 4-) 75-4, i O � E O � a) O O 3 +� y N 1 V i +' N a) �o 4-) M 4- U O G O O C O M Cl t CL)a) m U+ a) E +' r+ d� a_ y a) Ni N F- O Q? b cT O N N N N a) N a) a) N i r u u � a) a) cC (O O co Q � r Lf') O r M N l.C) ..> N O i C a� Z ro >r i 4 4- L Z7 N O O M 4-3 cu E E O 4-) kn U) W co N O a O S- Q- a) v O +t .- a) N d CL Q a) N N L a) ro ro4-3 N a) a) 'rU-• r p i i i U y Q > L) L) O > V C%] O O 4- d O V �• d• ro 'o N E Cl- d +j O a) i +3 N �O y r O _ , L) i N RS a +a c y 4- O O -a N � o °) a u L nii i••� O O O O V N to () m Jr. c CCD w au a) > O> > O O O i i -0-0 CL ro•� to N +j 4-) N O U U L v a) � >,va) a) +> E r O ¢ a) r r N S= Q L Co O ro U d > 4 m cu cu O rp Ij O 4-1 •r 4-3 U r N + �o N 73 R} V) r3 N _0 O O 4-3•� N O Crtn J E o +-3 E 4-) ra O S- a) d J SE.. � a) +3 4-S +.a M FT-0 ~ A O O O V +..t 1 t6 -F•a to +-) r Q) •r Q1S y S V) i V) O y O r �O 04- 4- O O CO O 0 J p p VI-1 /`l. T G�a?� GEOLOGY Study Approach Several field trips were made to the project to examine its topography, soil and rock types, geologic hazards, potential erosion areas, evidence of ground water, and potential material sources and surplus sites. This was supple- mented by discussions with members of the Region 1 geology staff. Use was also made of prior reports by the Region 1 geology staff detailing core drill records, laboratory soil analysis reports, and base design recommendations. VDetail , profile, and cross-section maps from the Location Section, as well as aerial mosaic maps from the Photogrammetric Unit were used. This unit was also checked for the presence of survey monuments in the project. The Location Section likewise supplied the aggregate, cut and fill , and clearing and d grubbing data. Both the Hydrology Unit and the Landscape Unit supplied informa- tion on erosion control . Project Alternatives The project essentially consists of the following three alternatives: i ALTERNATE I ALTERNATE 2 ALTERWE3 1 No-build Widen I-5 Widen I-5 (North Tigard and Haines Rebuild North Tigard Inter- Rebuild North Tigard Road Interchanges remain change, including Truck Interchange, In- as existing) Lane cluding Truck Lane Reconstruct Haines Road Reconstruct Haines Overpass Road Overpass Revise Haines Road Inter- Close Haines Road _ change Interchange VI-2 The above alternatives consist of widening a 1 .44 mile segement of Interstate Highway 5 near Tigard from four to six lanes, revision and recon- struction of two interchanges, improving alignments, creating a truck lane, and constructing, altering, or obliterating ramps and streets. Upon completion of the project, I-5 will be completely six-laned between Portland and Salem, the purpose being to more safely accommodate increasing traffic volumes. I No unusual construction problems are anticipated. ` Existing Environment Topography The project crosses the western lower slopes of Mt. Sylvania, an extinct volcano rising approximately 975 feet above mean sea level (a.m.s.l . ). Elevations on the freeway portion of the project rise from about 250 feet a.m.s.l . � . at the south end to about 500 feet a.m.s.l . at the north end, making an overall gradient of three percent. The gradient in the north portion, attaining a maximum of 5.8 percent north-easterly from the North Tigard Interchange, is considerably steeper than that in the south portion. The project hill slopes are gentle to moderate except for those of the steep-sided westerly-trending gully draining the area just south of the North Tigard Interchange. The freeway crosses the gully via a fill and conducts the unnamed intermittent stream westward by means of a culvert near Station 422+00. (A station is a survey point established every 100 feet, with smaller _ increments designated when needed, as: Station 422+28, which means 42,228 feet from theP oint of beginning, measured along the centerline.) _l' ma�mommo® ®� VI-3 r ogy Exploratory drilling along the project indicates a very irregular soil zone from 0 to 21 feet or more deep. Underlying this are the relatively thin flows of Boring Lava extruded from nearby Mt. Sylvania during the late Pliocene geologic age. This rock is a massive, blocky, gray porphyritic (larger crystals within a finer groundmass) olivine basalt that forms the bedrock throughout the project. The rock is weathered locally to depths of 46 feet or more. None of the drill holes, the deepest being 58 feet, are known to have penetrated the lava rock into the underlying sedimentary Troutdale Formation of early Pliocene age. No faults or other geologic structural weaknesses are known to occur ` - in the project area. ' Geologic Hazards Although no geologic hazards are known to occur in the project area, it is imperative that several wet areas be adequately drained before construction proceeds. These areas occur from the north end of the project to about freeway Station 387+00, and in the vicinity of two intermittent streams near Freeway Stations 422+00 and 54+00. Probing of the latter area along Line A in the Haines Road Interchange complex disclosed depths of soft soil 2.5 to 5.0 feet 1 deep. This is thought to be due to saturation rather than to an inherently weak soil. The area is very poorly drained and improving the drainage prior to placing embankment would greatly facilitate construction. The proposed remedial system of drainage culverts and ditches is described in detail in the Hydrology Section of this Draft Environmental Impact Statement. -Ig AMELAR BEGINNING OF PROJECT ISTA. 385+00 C5 U N. T,Gq o Rp�NTERCygNG F o0 I U ofd4'O/ c~a�o BHC• z F �Ov C Pei 7 420 TRUCK LANE CHANGE IN STA. I REFERENCE POINTS —4 - RANDOM FILL / ¢ N PORTLAND PLAZA w COMMUNITY SOUTHWEST COLLEGE \ GP j JU HAINES RD. — P��O Q 40 — _ — �a 20 ,�� BAYLOR OT I � � NORTH w F o' SOUTHVIEW ST. `rRpR 50 Ito NIULTNOMAH CO. PO w`N��cNPNf,O DOUGLAS , DR. — CLACKAMAS CO. a v co 60 to NP x I 1 z END OF P�JECT SOUTHWOOD PARK CN STA. 68+00 \ 70 Lo HAMPTON ST. OFFICE COMMERCIAL F• 9F O 10 S. S TIG ARD 9�G'y90 KRVSF __ �wAY J v�R CONST Figure VI-1 � 9 CARTER SE EIATtC�P SCA �. CR. ( VI-4 1 r Planned 2:1 slopes (cut two feet horizontal to one foot vertical) [ will be satisfactory throughout the project with the exception of the cut section 1 at the North Tigard Interchange where pre-splitting (a method of blasting in which both vertical and horizontal shots are made in close sequence) on 1/4:1 slopes is recormneded if the irregular rock surface and variable overburden (soil cover) depths will permit it. This should be at the discretion of the assigned Resident Engineer. The existing rock slopes are very irregular due to conven- tional blasting. I Soils Exploratory borings for structure and embankment foundation information 1 along the project show the typical soils to be clayey to sandy silts and silty clays varying from fine textured to rocky. The soil chosen for the base design is a gravelly sandy silt generally present in the construction zone. The following y test data of the soil are extracted from Laboratory Report No. 787647, on file with the Materials Section of the Oregon State Highway Division. CLASSI- SIEVE FICATION SOIL CONSTANTS ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS Liquid Plastic PlasticPassing AASHTO Limit Limit Index No 200 Sieve % 2mm* % Sand % Silt % Clay A-4(6) 29 22 7 66.8 9.6 23.6 47.0 19.8 * = larger than. 1. The A-4(6) classification designates the soil as being fair to poor t for subgrade or embankment material . An explanation of the other table headings ` and the impact of the test data on the proposed construction follows this text. is VI-5 i Granular material in the form of rocky soil and soft weathered lava rock may be expected in the deeper cut sections throughout most of the project. Lava rock occurrences indicate a very irregular rock profile. In the vicinity of the North Tigard Interchange lava rock is exposed in the existing cuts. Exploratory borings in the proposed cut section of the Interchange complex from freeway Station 410+50 to 411+50 disclosed hard, blocky rock with overburden soil depths of 7.5 to 21 .0 feet. The material from freeway Station 413+00 to 417+00, also within the Interchange complex, varies from soil to rocky soil and severely weathered soft lava rock. Farther south in the Haines Road Interchange complex, from freeway i Station 38+80 to 44+50, the material likewise varies from soil to rocky soil and 1 severely weathered soft lava rock except at Station 39+50. Here, a test boring disclosed hard, blocky lava rock from 5.3 to 19.0 feet underlain and overlain by soft weathered material . Large boulders may be expected, particularly on the left or east side of the freeway, south of Haines Road. TABLE EXPLANATION 1 . AASHTO Classification.--The.American Association of State Highway and f Transportation Officials classification rates soils on a scale of A-1 through A-7, with the lowest number indicating soils best suited for subgrades. Additional numbers are added to the basic classification for more definitive description. The A-4 (6) classification designates the soil as being fair to poor f for subgrade or embankment material . 2. Liquid Limit.--This test determines the moisture content at which a soil passing the No. 40 sieve changes from a plastic to a liquid state. The test is an index of cohesion in which the scale of 1 to 100 progressively indicates that the higher the clay content of the soil , the lower is its load-carrying capacity. The test determined that the soil passed from a plastic to a liquid state when its moisture content reached 29 percent. �I VI-6 3. Plastic Limit.--This test determines the moisture content at which the soil changes from a semi-solid to a plastic state. The plastic limit is governed by the clay content. The load-carrying capacity of the soil increases very rapidly as the moisture content is decreased below the plastic limit, and decreases very rapidly as the moisture content is increased above the plastic limit. The test determined that the soil would be in a semi-solid state when its moisture content was below 22 percent, and in a plastic state when it was above. 4. Plastic Index.--This figure is the numberical difference between the Liquid mit and the Plastic Limit, and represents the range in mois- ture content at which a soil is in a plastic state. A small plastic index, such as 5, shows that a small change in moisture content will change a soil from a semi-solid to a liquid state. Such a soil is very sensitive to moisture unless the silt and clay content combined is less than 20 percent. A. large plastic index, such as 20, shows : that considerable water can be added before the soil becomes liquid. The soil is plastic between a moisture range of 22 to 29 percent and, because of its moderate silt and clay content (66.8 percent), is moderately sensitive to moisture. 5. Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve.--The significance of this test is that it separates the fines TETay and silt) from the granular (sand and gravel) materials on a percentage basis. The moderate percentage of fine material (66.8 percent), indicates that the soil is fair to poor for subgrade and embankment construction. 6. Hydrometer Analysis.--This test is performed on the No. 10 minus R material to determine the percentages of sand, silt, clay, and colloids in the soil sample. The relatively moderate percentages of silt (47.0 percent) , and clay (19.8 percent), indicate a fair to poor soil for construction purposes because with a decrease in particle size the moisture content becomes more critical , drainage problems increase and, due to lack of internal friction, the supporting strength becomes less. Erosion Control Approximately 16.7 acres will be exposed in the project if Alternate 2 is constructed and 10.7 acres if Alternate 3 is constructed. Other than seeding (grass) and mulching, and the use of hay bales, it is not known at this early pre-contract date what other methods, if any, will be used to control erosion. t. . vI-7 It is important that the seeding, fertilizing, and mulching be applied in sufficient time during the growing season to assure germination and growth to stabilize the exposed areas and provide a protective cover, particularly for the slopes. If for some reason the slopes are not protected by grass or other flora before the fall and winter rains, means should be taken to prevent as much soil erosion as possible. In addition to seeding and mulching the fill slopes bridging the gully and intermittent stream in the vicinity of freeway Station 422+00, hay bales also will be used to alleviate siltation of the stream. Surface runoff from the random fill area in the gully east of the freeway will be directed toward one or more points along the adjacent ditch rechannelizing the stream. Hay bales will 1 be placed at these points, as well as above and adjacent to the culvert inlet to 1 lessen siltation. On the west side of the fill , hay bales are to be placed at ` the bottom near the freeway right-of-way line to prevent eroded material from entering the stream. As some gullying of this 2:1 slope is to be expected, cross drains along it may prove beneficial . The use of hay bales act as both energy dissipators and filters, and provide erosion and siltation control until the grass and/or other flora becomes well established. It is the policy of the Oregon State Highway Division to stipulate in its road grading contracts that all ground surfaces exposed to erosion be seeded and mulched. Other methods of erosion control are either stipulated in the contract or, in some unforeseen situations, may be decided by the Resident Engineer in the field during construction. A fund for this is provided in the contract. The work is done in stages along the project as soon as practicable i � after areas to be seeded and mulched are completed. To assure that there is no undue delay in applying the erosion control measures, the engineer can direct the contractor when to perform the work. Inspection and maintenance of erosion control measures, both temporary and permanent, is standard policy of the OSHD. Federal Highway Administration specifications for the federal aid programs in which grading is involved stipulate the following: "Under no conditions shall the amount of surface area of erodible earth material exposed at one time by excavation, borrow or fill within the right-of-way exceed 750,000 square feet (17.22 acres) without prior approval by the Engineer." and "Under no conditions shall the surface area of erodible earth material exposed at one time by clearing and grubbing i exceed 750,000 square feet without approval by the Engineer." Within the limits of the above FHWA specifications, the engineer may increase or decrease the amount of surface area of erodible earth material to be exposed at one time by clearing and grubbing, excavation, borrow and fill operations ` as determined by his analysis of project conditions. i Potential Material Sources No state-owned material source exists in the area and it is recommended that the choice of a suitable source be the responsibility of the contractor. Several of the commercial sources in the area believed most likely to be used for the project, based on suitability and economics, are the: 1) Santosh Gravel Pit; 2) Hardtack Island Gravel Pit; 3) Tonquin Quarry; and 4) the Rivergate iQuarry. Table VI-2, following, lists the physical aspects of these sources. C 0 J 4J 0 ro0 O C L i a.0 p r S 3 L O u Lp J..� '• 6J CU M M L- 41 O• rNN 3 _ W Y N o ro0 O V- N W _ _3 Z�•+ D 'O L L O Y N ro C d S ro N L C O a-� Ocm cu_ 7 Oo NY ro. CL Y Cl • C V C/ E 91 L V ro d Q� E .a+ M (U d•N O 00 C r C Y Cl M C ro Q j E C ro N C L ro O• ci U J ro O ro un O N > cuL O O X r-C.3 O Q)w 0 N m d 6 y U Q J W Z ro ro ea m:Ln OCC C 03: ' L C! C)r ro � T-1 Y Y U O NM i o dro N O O U O O � V N ro y >> 3 h- K ^ L S q Q) s- L ro O• Y Z O V In v ro C L N W O > p M w C C L ro N C C l Y Y O U O CJ a •� 'O C •p CJ d U C/ Z C u 3 3 00 -E O V ro Ql L > L L OD Y L C/ C L N C 7 I �n L3•�N Ci L ro O ++ N O ro E L ro L C W N r �� L >' L K S cr N O ¢ Y O a+ L y C O cu ro > O _N .~-. C1 roI6 d ^C (p o-L 4-' L 1 r Y 0 ea C) L N O. > C o n^ Cl Y i U Od F- 7 .I?.--. Q)a•> 0 i.+ aVi Y L Qi ro d i O ¢ Ol n E YU c7 0 F � ro•� .C- Q) C l Q Y '•L Cl ro ro N C L L 41 L C N O W w 7r S LC ro ro > r' ro N r Q! L L w 4j L 10 -0 E O .i N V ro Ql 'D r ro ^ N O Y • C Y N L C •� N a Y U U O N n Z L d n, O c O R ,� N ro w C) Q/ E c• E U L C/ E 4OQdS. VroOC N^^�ro r a.n-•�'OroO aYr.^+•i roCro OG>rof 'ro QC/ K OCro +.Ci•�.� QN O M +1 CJ cOCO. W ^ L 0CVl ._ 7 O L C d r 4 d7S1On.,•� ZUC7.ZMCO:U..�^rroCN>.NpddZ OE• CN. dL m N �nto OW CO8roNC.Yd�� 7YrodNCNJ4LTro�iWC-l YvONrodLVdO r�NiOYVOroW r0 ro V L O L Q d C) C L d d C13 O + b C )Yp�LCOEEEEV+roCLI1 ' l ro � c ro L m 4- C1 L Y C a F C) E ro L.� L O C! U-0 Y U C! L L Gi'i ro N ro N M G V L C 41 L C C V C GG V1 N 7 i Y Ln Q a, d c�i+ - W O 7 V L^ i u ro C) Cl p p L C) N U Co A x d 1 u d Ln 2 Q C U N cl- N J d d ro » 0 0 O O Z ¢�n W W f.. EA W U N Z c K W O W W .d•. U N W d T O r ~ kn O Z J >,,, T .�. K S N O C m d N 1-- r vyi Q O J v v 4 ¢ w Q _..� O =d Q d Cr Cr O 4 N O K J i A VI-9 It is estimated that approximately 115,000 cubic yards of crushed aggregate will be required for the project's Alternate 2 and 105,000 cubic yards for Alternate 3. Material Required It is estimated at this time (October 1976) that approximately 55,000 cubic yards of aggregate will be required for surfacing and incidental construc- tion for Alternate 2, and about 45,000 cubic yards for Alternate 3. These figures must be considered estimates because field conditions may necessitate changes. ! Excavation and Embankment Alternate 2 is estimated as requiring about 155,300 cubic yards of excavation and 151 ,600 cubic yards of common embankment material . Alternate 3 i is estimated as requiring about 121 ,000 cubic yards of excavation and 128,800 J cubic yards of common embankment material . These figures likewise must be considered estimates at this time. The following table presents the figures in comparative form. R ES Excavation ___ 155,300 cubic yards 121 ,000 cubic yards Embankment 151 ,600 cubic yards 128,800 cubic yards Taste. Sites No waste sites outside the project limits are required. The gully 1 east of the freeway in the vicinity of Station 422+00 will be random filled with VI-10 about 25,000 cubic yards of common embankment material . The remaining surplus can be distributed along the project without difficulty. (The difference between waste and surplus material is that waste must be stored outside the project limits, whereas surplus is used or distributed i within the project). Ground Water Water well logs on file in the State Engineer's Office indicate that the static ground water levels in the project are well below the freeway con- struction depths. A 610-foot well , drilled in November, 1953 for a restaurant on Barbur Boulevard in the North Tigard Interchange area, registered a static water level of 210 feet below land surface. Two other wells, located approxi- mately three-fourths mile east and one-half mile south of the above-cited well , registered static water levels of 80 feet below land surface, and 23 feet below land surface, respectively. It is likely, however, that isolated zones of perched ground water (held above the regional water table by impermeable material such as clay) occur in the project area, and that they contribute to the surface water runoff. This occurs particularly during the rainy seasons, and continues until the aquifers are depleted to the level that they stop flowing. Surface water runoff presents problems in several areas along the project, and these are discussed in the Hydrology Section of this Draft Environ- mental Impact Statement. Protection of Survey Monuments i Oregon State highway Division procedures insure that all vertical and horizontal monuments endangered by a proposed project are relocated. In the i; I'll 11 MINE I 111111�1 ,J� Kamm VI-11 case of National Geodetic Survey monuments, notification is made directly to the f National Geodetic Survey mark maintenance engineer. The National Geodetic 9 Survey provides the funding for monument relocation. It has been determined that no survey monuments exist in the project i area. 1 . L n 0 TABLE VI-2 GEOLOGIC IMPACT SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS ALTERNATIVE 1 ALTERNATIVE 2 ALTERNATIVE 3 No-Build Widen I-5 Widen I-5 Rebuild North Tigard Interchange, Rebuild North Tigard Interchange, Including Truck Lane Including Truck Lane Reconstruct Haines Road Overpass Reconstruct Haines Road Overpass Revise Haines Road Interchange Close Haines Road Interchange POSITIVE IMPACTS: Topoqraphy i No landscape degradation None None Soils I No soil disturbance None Haines Road Interchange ramps will be obliterated Erosion I No erosion increase None None Materials I No material committed None None rround Water None Drainage will be imnroved Draiflane will be improved I I i I I TEMPORARY ADVERSE IMPACTS: •� Topography i None Landscape degradation I Less landscape degradation None Vegetative soil zone disturbed on Vegetative soil zone disturbed Ve Soils I 17.2 acres on 7.6 acres Erosion None Erosion potential of 17.2 acres Erasion potential of 7.6 acres - Materials None Commitment of rock materials Commitment of rock materials None !:round Water Seasonal ponding will continue None —_- PERMANENT ADVERSE IMPACTS: Topography None Landscape degradation due to cuts Less landscape degradation due and fills to cuts and fills Soils None Loss of about 4.7 acres to new Loss of about 3.6 acres to roadway new roadway Erosion None Potential erosion of portions Potential erosion of portions of 17.2 acres of 7,6 acres None Abnut 55,000 cubic yards of aggregate. I About 45,000 cubic yards of agg-I n Materials 151.600 cubic yards of cnmmnn embankment i regate.77a,nnn cubic yards of e)i mat^vial c—n embankment material i i 1 Ground Water Seasonal ponding will continue None None I SHORT-TERM USE vs. LONG-TERM I i PRODUCTIVITY: No landscape change Present landscape will be permanently Less of the present landscape Topography changed will be permanently changed Soils No soils change About 4.7 acres will be permanently ! About en3.t acres will be committed to new roadway permanently committed to new roadway Erosion No erosion change Short-term exposure will be succeeded Short-term exposure will be by lona-term cover succeeded by long-term cover, plus obliterated street area Materials No material committed About 155,300 cubic yards of excavated About121i)rbe c, y. of excavated material to be put to long-term use m'tl. to be put to long-term use Ground Water No water level change Drainaqe will be improved on a long- I Drainane will be improved on term basis a long-term basis IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE � I CCkSMITMENT OF RESOURCES: I Materials No material committed A total of about 210,300 cubic yards A total of about 166;60, cubic of materials will be irretrievably I yards of materials will be committed i irretrievably committed .i VI-12 i. NORTH TIGARD-SOUTH TIGARD Project No. 626-1973-923 1 BIBLIOGRAPHY 1 . Beaulieu, J. D., 1971, Geologic Formations of Western Oregon, West of [ Longitude 120° 30' : Oregon Department Geology and Mineral Industries, t Bull . 70, 72 p. 2. Hart, D. H. , and Newcomb, R. C. , 1965, Geology and Ground Water of the Tualatin Valley, Oregon: U. S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1967. 3. Schlicker, H. G. , and Deacon, R. J. , 1967, Engineering Geology of the Tualatin 1 Valley Region, Oregon: Oregon Department Geology and Mineral Industries, Bull. 60, 103 p. 4 VII-1 i _ 3 WATER QUALITY Study Approach The body of data used to write this report was largely obtained from existing reference materials (see Bibliography). An eleven month turbidity and flow study was conducted at one site on Ball Creek. Weekly to semi-monthly samples were taken. Turbidity samples were collected in rinsed polyethylene containers and preserved with 1 mg/liter HgC12. They were returned to the laboratory and measured for turbidity within six hours after collection on a Hach Test Kit colorimeter. A distilled water blank was used to zero the meter. Flow measurements were taken at the same cross-section over the sampling period. Width and depth were measured with a tape measure and a leveling rod. Three or four depths were taken across the cross-section and averaged. Velocity was measured by determining the travel time of a wood chip or similar object through a distance of ten feet, five feet above and five feet below the cross-section. The roughness factor was assumed to be 1 .0, as the creek channel was clear of vegetation for most of the year for a short distance upstream and downstream of the cross-section. Vegetation did become quite dense during the summer months further upstream and downstream of the sampling site, ` however. 6( Spot checks on water quality were run at several sites. A Hach Field Test Kit was used for all measurements except the later date (1976) pH measure- ments. A corning Model 610A battery-operated pH meter was used for the latter determinations. ' �I VII-2 i r f Existing Environment �drol ogy The project corridor crosses the west slope of Mt. Sylvania, which is drained by a network of tributaries to the Tualatin River. Several first and second order streams including Ash Creek, Ball Creek, Carter Creek, and a number of unnamed tributaries drain into a larger downslope tributary called Fanno Creek, which enters the Tualatin River at R.M. 9.4. The Fanno Creek watershed, which occupies 32.5 square miles (20,800 acres), is shown in Figure VII-1. 1 Fanno Creek, as well as the Tualatin River itself, has experienced an alteration of its hydrologic characteristics in recent years as the watershed has been transformed from a predominantly rural/suburban area to an urban/light industrial one. Surface water runoff has greatly increased as the area had developed, since ground surface which normally allows rain waters to infiltrate into it has been covered with impermeable surfaces such as roads and houses. Therefore, much water which formerly percolated into the ground to join the local or regional water table now is conducted via roads, ditches, sewers, etc. directly to surface drainages, increasing peak storm flows. Further contributing to an increase in storm flows is fill and development on the flood plain, which results in a decrease it flood storage area and an alteration of flood flows. Flood flows in the Fanno Creek system, typical of small streams draining urban areas, are characterized by fast rises immediately after heavy rains and crest, shortly a after rainfall ceases (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1959). Only one unnamed intermittent stream (directly entering Fanno Creek actually crosses the proposed corridor (see Figure VII-2). It occupies a steep, ' we1Z-vegetated canyon and passes under the existing hiQhwas�(I-5) at ��ation Z VII-3 1 1 1 421 , via a 30-inch, 440-foot concrete pipe culvert. Near the northern terminus of the project, a tributary to Ash Creek originates from springs now located under the freeway at Station 386 and flows westerly into Ash Creek. Ball Creek and Carter Creek, both extensively altered by channelization and culvertization, cross I-5 south of the southern terminus of the project at South Tigard Inter- change. A general discussion of the water quality and aquatic biota in lower Fanno Creek and associated tributaries (some of which fall outside the immediate study area) will follow. This discussion will establish the aquatic "context" of the area, upon which the alterations caused by this project will be super- imposed. In this way, the relative magnitude of those alterations will be more clearly demonstrated. Water Quality Water quality of these streams has deteriorated along with the increase in the rate of development. Department of Environmental Quality records indicate that sewage contamination in Fanno Creek is a continuing problem, with fecal coliform levels hovering at or above (up to 2.5 times--see Table VII-1) the DEQ standard of an MPN of 240 per 100 ml (Special Water Quality Standards for the Tualatin River Basin, June, 1974). From the little data available, however, it appears that conditions have improved within the past five years; one low water sample taken from Fanno Creek on September 16, 1969, indicated fecal coliform levels of 24,000 per 100 ml , which is 100 times the standard. Elevated fecal J coliform levels are accompanied by low dissolved oKvgen concentrations (those on record when associated with high fecal coliform are all well below the 90-95% saturation levels required by DEQ for this river basin) , and by very high nutrient levels (nitrates, phosphates, ammonia). Conditions have apparently gradually improved as sewage treatment plants are installed and treatment methods upgraded. 26 26 g 8 CR. 99 10 r 208 - RALEIGH HILLS - a W r rW�L GR�£K 1 ; i 211 O _ y LIMITS 2 - - PROJECT , , , COOPER MTN. � � �,+ 43 + „+ S MT-SYLVANIA `�r s 0 UQ v BULL MTN. G(a i CA RT£RE GO z 5 9 TUALATIN 212 05 Figure VII-1 E'q FANNO CREEK WATERSHED Q AMD - • SAMPLING STATIONS _Q 1. 2, 8 and 9 3 1 , t N. TIGARD INTERCHANGE � pyo PJP G PQM Cte?k 3 e0 OO ryC� i 4 h IIw PORTLAND MT. SYLVANIA �0nn0 PLAZA 5 COMMUNITY 010 SOUTHWEST '� 1�n \ �I --IU HAINES RD. ! BAYLOR �Li! I, LJ 600 i SOUTHVIEW ST. 6 00 IZ i � DOUGLAS �DR. c `yo r a I 450 40 e �� I�[P • � SOUTHWOOD, PARK � 3 50 i Il � II �1li HAMPTON ST. ; I ,U✓ II �r� I / OFFICEl 300 COMMERCIAL it /'� Figure VII-2 TOPOGRAPHIC ISOPLETHS AND AQUATIC FEATURES S. TIGARD INTERCHANGE AND SAMPLING STATIONS • 3 thru 7 KRUSf ?50 I JIl�WAy I'! NOeR CONS. I I 200 X50 7 6 C-a�!er..�Cree�..•� VII-4 _ a L� N L ^ N o f o 0o M A N N co N L --- N O N V O O N O O C O �- L.v � c6 co 8 �o A_ pp pp EN N � E 2 v R T pa C O U O Y c F- Q L O Y� E O C O o O O O O o q - C u E � �V u w i � u r N q co N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N W Q E � N V CO 4l N N N N a F- U A a M �•O 2 SON N O W O CO Q` L O n n n!� n !� n n n n n �p � � n �O ♦O n N a Y U O O y q � H 3 i a _ > aC N m O N M C — M N co CO N C x E ^- O A � Fq- N V- O O O O V_ n O O n ^O O n in n ^ ^ ^ ^ V Y T d U V d Y q q q A C C C A A a J N V J J A A J 'E N Q N Cl Q N N Q y Q � � � 1--• .-- 111 q O O 4 L Vf d n n ti u C 3 d m Q N ♦+ 3 N a D ro a �- i q d d V L L i d J ro 1 J V D 22e� mR � AV T L L L 1 m r = f- 0 E A i •- N <n v an �o M o+ VS N VII-4 Most recent available fecal coliform measurements on Fanno Creek (March, June, 1975) indicate levels below the standard MPN of 240 per ml (i .e. , 130 and 60 per 100 ml respectively) . Additionally, a development known as Southwood Park on the southeast side of the project area (see Figure VII-3) , has severe septic tank limitations and an inadequate sewer system at this time (Unified Sewerage Agency, Washington County, 1976) . Sewage contamination of the ground water and subsequently of local surface drainages (including Ball Creek and Carter Creek) is considerable especially at periods of low flow, as can be observed from high nutrient concen- trations in creek water samples. A sewage system has been proposed for this area including Southwood Park and surrounding unsewered sectio, east of I-5 and west of Mt. Sylvania, between Barbur Blvd. and Carmen Road. This will greatly reduce groundwater and local surface water contamination problems. Further, loss of vegetative cover over considerable portions of the watershed as well as the extensive use of fill in localized areas has caused erosion, turbidity and siltation to become a problem throughout much of the Tualatin River system, particularly in the lower portions, includiric Fanno Creek and its tributaries. In parts of the Fanno Creek system, particularly where fill or poorly vegetated areas are traversed, turbidities exceeding 30 NTU* (the level used by DEQ to determine which of two turbidity standards will be used) are routinely observed, although of course turbidities vary considerably by season. An eleven-month study of Ball Creek turbidity (see Figure VII-311 at a site just south of South Tigard Interchange see Site 7 on Figure VII-2) showed what is probably a typical pattern of annL +urbidity variation in this watershed, *Nephelometric Turbidity Units r O T O cc} U � n LL N W Q LO a J m CD W Ln co r- f > S rnCD Q Lo Et Z C Y o W W cc C14U J J Q co M 1 N e - C n g W OO O •- S CD N O TURBIDITY (NTU) 1 o rn w } CC O F U Q y W 0 J CC LO C W > x - � y u. LR a U U- Q Q � `n Z ' O Y W W U J Q !J m co) N N 1 CD o U') CD Cl) N N STREAMFLOW, 0 (cfs) 1^ r VII-5 1 � and is correlated fairly well with streamflow (see Figure VII-4). One extremely high but ephemeral measurement was recorded in April , 1975, after a construction spill into the creek a short distance upstream. The concentration increase was intensified by low flow conditions at that time. The occurrence of that turbidity spike is typical of short-term construction effects in small drainages during low flow periods. In general , streams in the project area exhibit fairly low flows for most of the year, adequate to low dissolved oxygen levels, moderate (approximately neutral) pH, moderate to high temperatures, moderate total alkalinity and hardness levels, variable turbidity levels, and elevated nitrate and phosphate concentra- tions (more so during low flow periods than high flow periods) . High nutrient levels, aggravated by elevated temperatures, trigger the development of algal blooms, which, in addition to inhibiting light penetration into the water column, exert a considerable oxygen demand on overlying water once death and decay sets in, and inhibit the production of important fish food species both directly and ' indirectly. In general , the quality of these streams can be considered fair to poor in terms of their suitability for aquatic life. Aquatic Habitat There are no salmonid fish species such as salmon and trout present in the Fanno Creek system. A local resident reports that cutthroat trout once frequented Ash Creek, but none have been observed there for the last five to 10 years. The Oregon State Game Commission (now Oregon Department of Fisheries and Wildlife) investigation "Fish and Wildlife Resources of the Lower Willamette Basin, Oregon, and Their Water Use Requirements" (June! 1954) does not indicate Cthe presence of anadromous or resident salmonid fish species in the Fanno Creek VII-6 system. Contact with the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife (August, 1974) confirms that this is still the case; they further indicate that some warm water species are present (see Table VII-2) , but that no significant fishery exists for these species. A partial list of invertebrates present in the lower Tualatin River basin is also shown in Table VII-2. The invertebrate species list is general , indicating broad groupings of organisms and the presence of aquatic invertebrates from a wide range of microhabitats. Thus it is of little use in indicating the invertebrate population of any particular stream locality, but does provide indication of types of species present in the general area. Factors which affect the distribution and abundance of any of these species in any particular place include current speed, temperature, bottom composition and i dissolved substances (including oxygen, pH, hardness and nutrients) . Other i important factors include liability to drought and to floods, food, competition between species and shad (Hynes, 1972) . The species present are in general semi-tolerant to tolerant of degraded environmental conditions. In summary, the existing condition of Fanno Creek and its tributaries in terms of hydrology and water quality is fair to poor. Aquatic 'biota present are mostly in the form of species tolerant to less than ideal environmental conditions. Impacts Alternative 1 (No Build) Only small alterations of the aquatic system would result if the No-Build alternative were selected. +� VII-7 t A slight alteration of local drainage patterns both upstream and downstream of existing culverts may occur as their capacities are exceeded. With development continuing as it is in this watershed, increases in surface runoff are to be expected whether the highway facility is modified or not. Local alterations of erosional and d-,positional patterns will occur as a given- sized culvert is forced to convey ever-increasing quantities of runoff. TABLE VII-2 Partial Inventory of Aquatic Biota in the Fanno Creek System (Oregon Dept. of Fisheries & Wildlife, April , 1975) Warm Water Fish Invertebrates* Cottids Annelid Worms (earth worms, sludge worms, & leaches) Dace Molluscs (snails & clams) Suckers Crustaceans: Redside Shiners Crayfish Squawfish Isopods Amphipods Mayflies-running water Stoneflies-running water Dragonflies, damselflies-pond, shallow lake Waterbugs, water striders, and backswimmers Alderflies, dobsonflies, and hellgrammites Caddisflies Whirligig beetles and diving beetles Midges, mosquitoes and other true flies *Found in the lower Tualatin Basin Further, given that no additional roadway is constructed and road runoff quantities remain constant, pollutants in runoff from the roadway (oils, greases, lead, cadmium, manganese, asbestos, etc. ) will increase in concentration as traffic volumes increase. Of course, roadway pollutants will be diluted by increasing VII-8 quantities of runoff coming from other areas, but at the same time those pollutants will interact with pollutants (silt most particularly) , in the incoming runoff water. The quantitative effect of this is not known, but it is obvious that selection of the No-Build alternative does not guarantee the maintenance of an aquatic statusucuoo. Selection of the No-Build alternative would have no effect on flood flows and flood storage, ground water contamination, or erosion from cut and fill slopes. Alternative 2 (Haines In) i Impacts j Alternative 2 will have minor impact on the Fanno Creek System as a whole. Temporarily, moderate to severe disturbance will occur in the Fanno Creek tributary which crosses Interstate 5, but this stream is not a highly productive part of the watershed. Otherwise, impact of this alternative on the aquatic system can be considered minor. Aquatic impacts accruing from the selection of this alternative include alteration of local drainage patterns, alteration of flood flows , disruption of aquatic biota and stream quality at the Fanno Creek tributary, alteration in quality and quantity of storm sewer effluent, erosion of cut and fill slopes g into local waterways, an increase in ground water contamination in some areas f near the roadway, and improvement of drainage facilities across the roadway. Most alterations will be minor in their effect. Since some watershed area will be paved over with the selection of this alternative, less percolation of precipitation into the ground water table I VII-9 a and more surface runoff will result. However, since the area to be paved in under this alternative is 4.7 acres, i .e. , only 0.02% of the total area of Fanno Creek watershed, it is not expected that a significant shift in the ground water/surface water storage ratio will occur. Also associated with increased Ssurface runoff from paving and removal of vegetation is an increase in both the size and shape of high water and flood peaks. Increased runoff increases the size and decreases the response time of storm peaks. Here again, however, since the additional pavement amounts to only 4.7 acres, the effect this will have on 9 Fanno Creek storm peaks is minor. Another problem related to diversion of some incident precipitation . from ground water to surface water reservoirs is the probable (minor) increase in sewage contaminant concentrations due to lower dilution by ground water. Storm sewer effluent, on the other hand, will be more diluted than it is pre- sently due to increased surface runoff. This will counteract to an undetermined extent the increase of pollutants in road runoff resulting from higher traffic volumes. The greatest impact this project will have on the aquatic environment will be disruption of biota, vegetation and stream quality at the Fanno Creek tributary crossing the project area at State 421+42. Impact from this will be considerably reduced however by the mitigative measures detailed below. The creek will be rechannelized in its headwater area above the existing culvert on the east side of the freeway. The old channel and most of the creek valley will be random-filled on a 1 percent grade in order to direct runoff waters to the inlet of the new 42" CMP culvert. The new culvert, at Station 422, will be larger and on a shallower grade (0.10 percent) than the existing concrete pipe at Station 421+42. It has been designed to adequately accept incoming runoff �_ for the next twenty years, based on growth projections for the area. f VII-10 To that extent, it will be an improvement over the existing pipe. Existing aquatic biota and vegetation occupying the creek and creek valley where the random fill and culvert extensions are to be placed will be destroyed, with the exception of a few organisms which are able to rapidly relocate. Few, if any, fish are present at the upper creek, however, as the gradient of both the creek and the existing culvert is very steep, and the culvert length is considerat'le. Temporary downstream degradation of water quality, especially elevated turbidity, will occur, although measures will be taken to minimize this and to minimize long-term water quality problems. It is highly improbable that the zone of disturbance (except very temporarily) will extend to its confluence with Fanno Creek. Not more than twenty-seven acres of cut and fill slope will be exposed as a consequence of roadway construction if this alternative is selected. Due to heavy precipitation and the presence of highly erodible soils in this area, erosion from exposed surfaces would be considerable were mitigative measures not taken to reduce this action. See Geology report for more information concerning source erosion and source erosion control . Some of this eroded material will find its way into local surface waterways . In this instance the only waterways to be affected will be the Fanno Creek tributary and possibly the Ash Creek tributary on the northwestern end of the project. Minimization of Harm 4 The primary aquatic area requiring ri;tigative measures on this project j is Fanno Creek tributary, since it will be filled, rechannelized, and reculverted. Hay bales will be placed on the west side of the random fill (which is on the east side of the highway) above the culvert crossing and at the culvert inlet. i i VII-11 E The hay bales act as energy dissipators, filters and create slack water behind them, which allows sediment particles to settle out. They provide short to medium term erosion control and allow long-term measures (see Geology) to become ( well established. The random fill , which acts as a detention basin for water 1 flowing into the culvert, will be planted with grass and brush. At the culvert outlet will be a concrete flume with energy dissipators (probably large riprap) and a chute to break the force of water coming through the short, steep culvert. Additionally, hay bales will be placed at intervals along the fill slope on the west side of the freeway to further reduce sediment inputs into the creek. See Geology section for a complete discussion of additional erosion control measures to be utilized on all cut and fill slopes. Mitigation measures to compensate for increased flows caused by the additional 4.7 acres and pavement proposed under Alternative 2 are as follows: t (see attached) 1 . In the Barbur Boulevard Interchange, the storm sewer beginning at L"6" Station 407+50 and terminating at L"6" Station 422 can outfall into the detention basin upstream from the proposed 42-inch CMP. 2. In the Haines Road Interchange, the storm sewer beginning j Station L"5" 41+70 and terminating at "A" Station 51 could incorporate detention. This detention could be either (1) subsurface in the form of 48-inch diameter pipe with a restricted outfall , or (2) surface basins located in the area adjacent to the "C" line and the triangular area bounded by the L"5", "A" and "B" lines . Alternatives Impacts Impacts resulting from the selection of Alternative 3 will be the same as those described for Alternative 2, although the significance of the negative impacts will be slightly smaller with Alternative 3. The primary differences between the two alternatives as they relate to aquatic impacts VII-12 are (1) 3.6 acres of previously open land will be paved, as opposed to 4.7 acres for Alternative 2 and (2) not more than 17 acres of exposed surface area on cut and fill slopes will result from the selection of this alternative , contrasted to 27 with Alternative 2, with cuncomitantly less erosion quantitatively. Mitigation_ The procedures discussed under Alternative 2 will also be used if Alternative 3 is selected. 1 �I i MrMff t VII- 13 1 BIBLIOGRAPHY g 1 . Hynes, H.B.N. , 1972. The Ecology of Running Waters. University of Toronto Press. 2. Oregon State Game Commission (now Oregon Department of Fisheries and Wildlife) , June, 1964. Fish and Wildlife Resources of the Lower Willamette Basin. Portland, Oregon. 3. State of Oregon, Department of Environmental Quality, June, 1974. Regulations Relating to Water Quality Control in Oregon. Sections from Oregon Admin s rative Rules, Chapter 340.- 4. United Sewerage Agency, Washington County, Jan. , 1976. Draft Lower Tualatin Facilities Plan. Washington County, Oregon. 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, June, 1969. Flood Plain Information: Tualatin River and Tributaries. Prepared for Was ington County, Oregon, by U. Army Engineer District, Portland. Corps of Engineers, Portland, Oregon. l MW VIII-1 I l BIOLOGY Methods The study area chosen for this biology analysis is a corridor 2,000 feet wide extending from the North Tigard Intersection to the South Tigard Intersection; the corridor is centered on the centerline of Interstate 5. The study area was made large enough so that 1 ) locally significant habitat features would be 1 included, and 2) so that no primary impacts would occur outside or near its boundaries. An aerial photographic mosaic was used to delineate the boundaries of vegetation cover types and these types were tentatively classified. One or more stands per cover type were selected for field sampling by an expanded "Point Quarter" survey. Ground truthing of the initial type classifications and a less detailed habitat investigation was conducted at other representative locations throughout the remainder of the study area to expand on the data gathered from "Point Quarter" sampling sites; this procedure is more efficient than relying solely on a "Point-Quarter" survey and ,;fudged adequate for this project area. The Point-Quarter survey is a plotless method of investigating woodland or shrub stands. It allows estimates to be made of tree species composition, dominance, density and relative importance within a stand. In addition to the basic measurements of this system, data were collected on tree height, age, diameter, species distribution, and the estimated visibility by quadrant. Notes I were made on the structural stratification of the stand (i.e. , canopy, competing tree layer, sapling-shrub layer, and herbaceous layer) . VIII-2 The occurrence of wildlife evidence and the presence of den trees were noted. These data not only are useful in evaluating present habitat character- istics but can establish past history and future trends. In predominantly residential areas, a simple species count was made of ornamental trees and shrubs along selected streets; this was done to establish species ratios which were applied over the "residential habitat type" since many ornamentals are important sources of wildlife food and cover. Analysis of Impacts Forecast changes in existing habitat conditions were considered negative whenever the change would result in: 1 . A direct loss of productive habitat as a result of any cause. 2. A destructive alteration of "critical habitat" prohibiting re- replacement in kind. 3. The substitution of habitat with fewer or less varied resources i E (food, cover, water proximity) than are available in existing habitat. i Changes were considered positive to varying degrees whenever: i 1 . Existing paved surface is to be obliterated and replaced by vegetation. f 2. "Critical wildlife habitat" is expanded or enhanced. 3. The interspersion of habitat types or resources will be changed in an advantageous manner. Because any change in habitat has both positive and negative results when different organisms are considered, the value judgments of this report are VIII-3 , based on species of known interest or past value to people. Statements of the magnitude or significance are therefore subjective. Existing Environment Overview The strip of land (2000 feet wide) bordering Interstate 5 between the South Tigard Intersection and the Porth Tigard Intersection is a mixture of developed and relatively undeveloped land. Within the corridor can be found farms, rural dwellings, suburban housing, light industry, and multi-story office buildings. The intrinsic qualities of the wildlife habitat found in the undeveloped areas which are scattered throughout the corridor do not differ markedly from brush, woodland, or grassland habitat which exists throughout the lower Willamette Valley. However, the number of species of wildlife which reside in the corridor is severely limited by habitat parcel size and the urban nature of the surroundings. Faunal species which require free access to large areas, or whose presence is inhibited by man's activities are uncommon within the corridor. Travel of all but those species possessed of flight, or of a size small enough to allow movement through the culvert system, is impeded by the existing network of heavily traveled freeways and major arterials. Consequently, the fauna of the corridor consists mainly of birds, or of small mammals, reptiles and amphibians which have limited home range requirements (Table 1 ) . Habitat The habitat of the corridor can be classified as woodlands, brush, grassland, or developed. These four types occur both as the result of natural d TABLE VIII-1 f SOME COMMON WILDLIFE OF THE AREA AND THEIR HABITAT REQUIREMENTS -------------HABITAT------------- t SPECIES Woodlands Brush Grassland Opossum Raccoon Gray Squirrel Chickaree Deer Mouse Meadow Mouse Tree Mouse Woodrat Gopher Mole Skunk Chipmunk 1 Gray Digger Brush Rabbit Weasel Domestic Dogs Domestic Cats Scrub Jay N I Stellar's Jay —N---- Brewer's Blackbird Robin — N N Varied Thrush Bush Tit --N — Chicadee N Nuthatch =—N Winter Wren N — 1 Bewick's Wren Song Sparrow ---N Towhee --N Hairy Woodpecker --fel Downy Woodpecker Flicker lRufous Hummingbird Table VIII-1 (cont.) -------------HABITAT------------- ' SPECIES Woodlands Brush Grassland Valley Quail N Ruffed Grouse Screech Owl Nighthawk Tree Swallow Violet Green Swallow Horned Lark N Redtailed Hawk Cooper's Hawk N Sparrow Hawk N American Goldfinch –N Cedar Waxwing —N White Crowned Sparrow -N Golden Crowned Sparrow Evening Grosbeak Chipping Sparrow Junco N , Savannah Sparrow Vesper Sparrow House Sparrow N Preferred Habitat N Nest Site Preference VIII-4 f � processes and of cultural development; consequently, there is a great deal of variation within any of these classifications. Woodlands Natural woodlands usually occur in closed canopy stands of varying size, the largest of these being about 15 acres in area. The largest of these stands persist on steeper slopes of the small stream valleys which cross the corridor. Smaller closed canopy stands parallel the right-of-way while others !B are scattered in a random fashion within the corridor. These woodlands are usually dense, frequently measuring between 600 and 900 trees per acre. The tallest individuals of these stands (Douglas fir) fmay be 90 to 130 feet ii height but the mean height of the stands is much less (approximately 38 feet) . These stands are most frequently dominated by Oregon white oak or Oregon ash with lesser amounts of Bigleaf maple, Red alder, Douglas fir, or Western Red cedar. Suburban lawns and gardens as well as landscaped areas surrounding office parks are often of a woodland nature. Those which are adjacent to natural woodlands are usually beneficial to songbirds (which are the conspicuous fauna of the area) by creating habitat diversity on a small scale. Food, cover, and fshelter are concentrated near such openings in natural woodlands. Yards and gardens which are more distant from woodland sites are also beneficial to bird life but the birds which benefit are likely to be of different species (Table 1 ). ' Brush Areas occupied by brush comprise only 5 percent of the land within the corridor but most brushland occurs near the right-of-way. Much of this brush VIII-5 occurs as a result of right-of-way clearing, landscaping, or invasion of once- 1 cleared lands by vegetation of nearby land. The most commonly occurring plant species of this habitat are Himalaya berry, multiflora and sweetbriar rose, hawthorn, Scotch broom, ninebark, ocean spray, and an occasional Oregon crabapple. In areas where brush is adjacent to woodland it provides an important source of food for woodland birds; when it is adjacent to grassland it serves j not only as a source of food but as cover for species of grassy areas. In 6 addition, some species of birds and mammals such as the brush rabbit and the towhee seldom stray away from dense brush. Grassland Grasslands occur throughout the corridor, the larger being associated f with farms, school yards, and roadside right-of-way. This habitat also supports � I its characteristic fauna (Table VIII-2) . Although grasslands are potentially very productive, they lack cover. Except for species which burrow beneath the ground, those which are very small , or those with an effective defense (such as body size, fighting ability, or control of an offensive odor) wildlife use of grasslands is restricted to edges where nearby cover is available. In addition, much of the potential food pro- ductivity of grasslands is lost if they are mowed before seed has matured. This practice greatly reduces their value to wildlife since grass and weed seed is nutritious throughout the year. Seasonal use by birds and small mammals is still high because of the presence of large insect populations. The interspersion of habitat types is an important factor in con- trolling the distribution and concentration of resources and thus greatly influences the nature of the faunal community. Within the study area a high _1 VIII-6 degree of interspersion already exists, largely because of residential develop- ment; the slight increase in interspersion related to this project will be of no significant value. Fauna, Flora, and Habitat of Special Interest There are no state or federal "threatened or endangered" species of wildlife in the study area nor are there now any habitat features which would be critical to these species should they occupy the area in the future. At this time there is no finalized listing of "threatened or endangered flora"; however, it is anticipated that the status of tentatively listed plants will be made official in the near future. The occurence of seven species of plants on the proposed list of endangered species (Smithsonian Institution, 1974) has been reported in the northern Willamette Valley in habitats of similar types of those found in the study area (Dyrness et al , 1975). The study area was examined and several specimen were tested to determine if any bf the type on the proposed list occurred in the study area. None were determined to be of the proposed endangered species. No known "champion trees" occur in the study area. t - Impacts - General Existing conditions have limited the nature of the fauna to a great degree. The impacts that are expected to occur from this p p project are associated with: 1) a quantitative long term loss of existing habitat as additional land is paved; and 2 a 1 � • ) qualitative long or short term loss as existing habitat is cleared and then made to conform to highway standards and safety concepts, and 3) continued urban growth resulting in negative changes to surrounding habitat. 01 VIII-7 -- 1 The impacts to wildlife are considered minor for the following reasons. Although the predicted impacts have a high degree of probability of occurrence and are severe where impacts occur, they are of limited scope. The changes which will occur have local significance but are not significant to the wildlife resources of the county, the state, or the nation. Should no highway construc- tion occur, much the same impacts are expected because of future development of t surrounding land. Highway changes are only expected to influence how quickly g this development takes place. Impacts of the Three Alternatives Alternative 1 , The "No-Build" Alternative This alternative has the least impact on wildlife of the three alter- natives. No habitat would be changed or removed. No pavement would be obliterated. 1 Stimuli for urbanization of adjacent habitat would be least, especially if the Haines Interchange were closed. The advantage to wildlife is one of time; conditions for wildlife are expected to become worse as the area develops as ` planned. Alternative 2 This alternative would have the greatest impact on wildlife of the three alternatives. Table 2 shows the comparative magnitudes of habitat commitments. 1 . Approximately 4.7 acres of existing habitat will be paved over, a direct long-term irreversible loss. 2. Approximately 17 additional acres would be cleared and then 1 revegetated. The nature of the change which would occur is as 1 F follows: _ f lip TABLE VIII-2 SUMMARY OF HABITAT LOSS AND CHANGE BY HABITAT TYPE --------------------Acreages--------------------- Alternative TOTAL Woodlands Brush Grassland Res./Ind. 1 (No-Build) 0 0 0 0 2 -(With Haines Inter- section) a. Long Term Loss 15.2 9.7 0.6 1.3 3.6 b. Short-Term Loss Due to Clearing 19.8 * 1.7 4.9 13.2 C. Medium-Term (5-15 years) Reduction in Habitat Complexity 1.7 0 1.7 0 0 3 (Without Haines Intersection) a. Long Term Loss 8.3 4.4 0.4 0.9 2.6 b. Short Term Loss Due to Clearing 7.7 * 0. 7 1.9 5.1 c. Medium Term Reduction in Habitat Complexity .07 0 0.7 0 0 t _ *Loss is already considered as long-term loss. VIII-8 a. Long-term loss due to a qualitative reduction of habitat characteristics; 4.7 acres. b. Medium-term loss due to a qualitative reduction in habitat characteristics where grassland replaces brush; 1 .1 acres. C. Short-term loss where grassland replaces grassland or resi- dential habitat; 11 .4 acres. This alternative which includes improvement to the Haines Intersection i is expected to stimulate the planned development of the adjacent lands more than Alternatives 1 or 3. In so doing, it would have the most adverse effect on existing wildlife. . 1 Alternative 3 This alternative is of approximately one-half of the magnitude of Alternative 2. In terms of habitat commitments the proportion of long-term commitments to total commitments is higher than for Alternative 2 (Table 2) . 1 . Approximately 5.7 acres of existing habitat would be committed on a long-term basis (52% of the total area) ; 3.6 acres would be paved over and 2.1 acres would undergo long-term degradation of existing habitat characteristics. 2. The remainder (except for 4% brush) would undergo a short-term loss of productivity (approximately 2 years) . This alternative will probably have little influence on the rate of growth of adjacent areas. For a complete discussion refer to the economist's B report and figure (Location of Sewers in the Study Area) in which the relative 1 influence of sewage lines versus highway access on urban development are compared. VIII-9 Minimization of Adverse Impacts The necessity for mitigation in a project such as this where individual adverse impacts are not of major importance nor well defined must be stressed. The cumulative effect of the loss of habitat which results from construction of many such projects is significant, yet the absence of obviously important adverse impacts in a given project encourages overlooking the need to offset the more common impacts. The only sure way to offset this chronic loss of habitat, habitat quality, and time is to minimize or mitigate each loss as it occurs, - realizing that the significance of an impact cannot always be judged within the limits of a single project. Measures to minimize the loss of wildlife habitat are aimed at re- storing a degree of habitat variety and provide food and cover as quickly as possible to open land in the construction zone. As previously stated, songbirds are the conspicuous species of the study area. A wide variety of songbirds would benefit if small trees and shrubs were planted in clumps along the highway. Such species as alder, cascara buckthorn, elderberry, hawthorn, honeysuckle, madrone, holly, mountain ash, salal , snowberry, oceanspray and red flowering currant are expecially attractive to birds. Except for alder, none of these species would grow quickly enough to become a safety problem within a reasonable length of time. The differing growth forms of these species would serve to form small dense clumps; these should be spaced as terrain permits, but with a general spacing of about 80 yards. Grasses planted between clumps should be selected for their ability to control erosion but additional features should also be sought. Grasses should be low growth form to reduce the necessity of mowing and allow seeds to ripen VIII-10 and fall . Species whose seeds are not awned or which fall free from the floret are desirable; hedvy seed producers are desirable but sodgrasses are preferable to bunchgrasses. These measures are equally applicable to Alternatives 2 and 3; no mitigation is considered necessary for the "No-Build" Alternative. - 6 B +4 r,i�, c)r Frar, n „errs; a I cj C T yr 'r` e Ci e f 'Aa shi Iqtrr. !i A Fores -P p C, �V -in� :;r'd L �16E, kj a!-,,I'a o P:Cii eta-e 2 . Intl es, Press I - P� — S ca r, �1S, �In- LN E-I S r):-, 3. Ma r t i n . . 5:)- t p I ant S P e and S Jd e n S 0 n 11C 4 Ra nda I I �,,7S t Revised edition. ry a I or er 1) ans "F d RE: ica. Cf 5. Steib-Ins C. • New yc)r-k: '-4e 6. Smith R . L . 966 E��)!oqy and IN evo, 'T Or r p e a 686 paqe� - onse r v a t Service. 7 . U.S.D.A. , Sol', C 7-L-1 4090-232, Rev. May 137`3. d S. Blaser, R. E. and W. H. M�cKee, Jr. -" aY f,Sf- Roadsides. Highway Research D. (2 e- �rlastltn-c n 74967 M 9. Dyrness, C Jerry F. F ra n k I i n C,,-,-, i s � a s e r, ta n ton. A. C, J a5l-5 ch Natural Area ',ec-ds JT) Hall , acid Glenda Faxon. 1975. Pesear Northwest. :',,c;I f i c IN o r t-h w e s t Forest nna P,-j—nge�L x p e r im o n of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Portland , 01-e,,:on. cns ivc Pl ,�n/Zn n nri MAP (?&f 5 1 *2') (I!°lltd'INla{a a{elya a{e�e[a ep r{I y! 1{I I{I Ija r r{T m I{i r t T t i e i , a E e i i alit Ja r, ,,. —• _ _ �__ .� — _ —_'. ! ! 6 9 ! ! I ! . 1 t i i _P.l r! ��l�.1 !1—j ! o i {� I . i1 lalaA [Io r { ! I'r'!'1'I•r'!'E'1�+'J'ia!'If�ala(aa:l°la;aiapa[a!k! _ ! NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - THE QUALITY OF TtE ORIGINAL .. _ DRAWING. .•-.c .,....-..- r. __'- __ _ ' OE 6Z EZ LZ 82 52 bZ P:2 ZZ 12 02 6f BI L! 9! Sr bl E1 21 ID 0! 6 9 L 9' S _ b S Z I � e< .narauahaW�WN9ana�aueisaW�eaaaleN�r�'=��a�•••�e •! 1••••! r ° I I 1 ► —__°++•?s�LE14•�_�,r iso - S 'hY'fH1A33i6ait11.31 �i LR I�,li_a�.er'aF1IaIs r. 1 ZY .010% 9 i h I ti .SEI/4 SEI/4, SECTION 36 TIS RIW WM IS 136DD WASHINGTON' COUNTY OREGON SCALE I°= 100' SEE MAP6DAI. gyp,\NES ST ET Cyd. , S 99°77•W I119ATLANTA ' 79-,9710 ' Ils.6 125 100 100 r loo C'�a loo 100 75.4 ao 1600 1500 24 60 " 1000 - 900 24. so 1 700-24N 6° $ 1200 100 24 so 'F 2 l 90-IIIb 63•�I' A'_ - SO 3 C.S.13,751 - — 23 3 — — — —23 F 2 — 23 J 2 —a! _ _9 3 - - - 22 F 3 801 - 22 22 _ W 4 - - -22 4- - 21 5 - - -- 51100 F - - - Zf 4 21 r -- - __21 - - - 20 5 _ _ 20 5 20 - -20 6 _ _ 19 6 19 - - - -- 7 _ 6 19 - _ _ IS 7_ _ 1400_18 7 800 f8 7 301 - -- 18 11-, 8 - - 125 i8 '� 8 loo o0 17 = 8 1.00 T Tlo� 17 LLj 400,00 60,� 17 w 170j _ Cat10ELLE0 TAX LOTS I I I 1 1 01 12 00 I I 1310 I I I I 1 _ 51001 I T aoo,z601,4200,4500,4600, O 1 �+.. I^ I I O z I I - 4700,5401,6101,6400,5600, O O O 6701,3401, �' T3002, 0 9 1 101 11,12 131 I I5� Isl 17 Q > T I 1 I 1. 1�f o > 2 1 I I I 1 i o 39.59- 25 z7 z9 10 II 1 1 20-65071 Q 91 101 111 12 13 14 15 16 < 9 25- IO II 12 13 14 15 16 > Q $w ®AYL01� $TF$E1=T SII y �80-14553 w 3T.4� 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 8 pg 21 0 3 2 00 7 58 20 0 19I 1 r 3 O 3 33 15 6 30 e8 253 90 3 38 6 7 ix 0 o f I I � o o I I I I I Ia al f p l �,I 1 1 I I I I i - - I I SII I I I I I i I I I o + L1 62100 loo 9 10° _f_ 1 g 0 00 o0 + 37 102800 — — 36 340�L — + 6 — 36 4000 4400 36 — — + — -- - - - 35 10- - IG — 35 2 12— — _ _ + — —36 11 3290 34 I I_ — 3700 34 11 — — — — 34 13 — — — 35 1 122890 33 -12 —— } — _33 12 — — —— 33 14 — 2500 34 32900_ 3200 32 13 —`- - 48— 32 13 4300_32 15 33 14 — — 31 301 _14— — 3f 4100 31 SEE .MAP 62200 _ 240(0_32 15— — _ IS _ 3600 � — — — I S I 36DC i7 � — —v`31 16 T- 29 CD 16 -IL - ' 30 g/j 15 17' O 18 - - - 30. 17 3 000 3001 28 , 3403 29 f � -)_ _ _ _ 28 17 _ 28 19 loo 29 18 too. loo 27 1 34044 18 too loo 27 1-3 too 7 23 0 TTT TTT26 OT.T < 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I8 m3i°OI 1 3411 1 a� c c 'g 31100 ` 0 0 211 490/461 201 211 221 231 2412a5 261 27 28 x191 201 21 2 1 21 1251 191 1 I I i 1 540/427 X23 c /� w\ 2879 2s 2s 23 I J L 12 251 23 24 26 - ul 1 1 �t24 25 , 54q/ztt�— r 1. $w CLINTON 6� T13EET ® C) \ zz 251 2 3 4 $ 6 7 58 261 ' - 07 10 1 I 1 6 1 O 1 61�01 31 4 51 71 e 140 3 4 536 . 7258 IT 27 3T 4T 5T 6T 7�2� I 1 1 1 1 I i I I � t o 1 I I I I I I I I I - °e 24_774 4�7100 100. 00 100 1 0 i \ _ — — 760; 36' 96204 -- 6800 36 i 5300_4 6000_36 g 109 520010036 10 _ _35 10— _ 35 10 11 7200— — 34 II_ _ 6700 5301 — — — —35 10 34 i II_ _ 34 11 __34 12 7600 33 12_ — 33 10 12 5900 33 12 , 137300 II 33 32 f3 12 66_00 32 '35500 1 5901 32 cs.losn - 13 I 32 - 141CSxoro7ez) 31 146300 _ _ 31 14_ _ _ 31 488/167 \80-45796 - 157400 1 1 30 15 - 30 15 !T _ _29 0 16__ — 429 � 16 �29 � 16 � � � V� 17 28 17 6500 28 1 17 80-45786 + \ "L CC24587 29 - 18 - 18 100 27 { 18 i 28 .14 AC 4 800_ a 28 r]� T too 27 7500 I T T_T T r r r 8i-4W7° T IT T Is 100 1 of 27 I I I BO-9698 I T,800 1 149 5000 " . ��y 36 31 t9rE o o_o C.$,105i7 I I I'� so-3736z 57001 ,45 AC 1 0l a Io.24AC.'./5AC, o ,, "Y, ' - L29AC. 1 +c T. I _I I I I s0 $ 's O. N - o o - -�� 8 19 21 22 24 26 m I I , I I I -I_I I 'I I SBO 1 6o JMX / a as 23 619_20 21 22_23 24 25 26 19 1.20 7ij_ 23124,-2!51,'261 "6,_I i9,2 21122 231 231 2 2Fz < - �( \ 3 S W _ DARTMOUTH ST. F T -- - T I GARD _ ,StE MIA-0 i i - . IS I .36DD - � - 2 S I IAA ...__.-..:.�---�-.-,._---r;,,-ems- i�Y�i--•�• - _ ._ ._. ._. . .._.. ... ...... . . r' . �1i1111111111111 11111/111111111 11111111t11111i I I I11111TIIliTpTT IiT1Ttl11 '111 1TIi11 l1111 111 l1111111i 1111111 1111 plyiIIIIIJI11111111itI111I11111111111111�1 111 I111 j111 1111 1111 1rir 11 11 1bl - NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED -......_ ..._ 1 2 3 4 .- rJ 6 7 8 9 0 11 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN 121 THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. OE 6Z 9Z LZ 9Z SZ bZ EZZZ 12 OZ G1 91 CI 91 SI bl EI ZI if 01 6 9 L 9 5 b E 2 1 c NE I/4 E'I/4 ,SECTIGN, I T2S R14V W.M. 2S i I ,... 31 WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON .. 6 '' 3u" SCALE . IN - - SEE'MAP =100 S - L IS 136DD - - - - - - - -1 L- - - - - - - J 1 r3 S.W. DARTMOUTH ST 19II . I I1 ± I ± I200' s0I.55' 3 00 290280 I O 27VO I 180I W. TII E T( ' T a �z5IfzdrI z5'TI 2WfI 25IT25•tzTi �I 251- 5o' 6718 121'31 -LAi 21341514 6I7o - f - .t -�- t -I I I I =�•, 10 I I 1 I � 1 . �. 3100 g 9 36 1400 400 10 3200 10- ---- --- - -- ---- II - 35 - ---- 2.93 Ac -i-- I i 2600,11 34 - - - —' - -t- 12 `12 -- -- --- - -.--- 12 190p 33 3400 13 3300240013_ 32 - --.- - - --a �-----1---- - 3500 14 ---- f4 31 — - -- - -- - - W 15 15 I� _ 30 1301 —-+ -- r- - -� :�+ 2301 16 29 Lu ---- -- m -� --- 3601 -17 3600' 17 2100 Q --- -- ---+ r�- -- -4- IB 27 1 3 1 0 7 -I- " 7- T -7 TT I t. 1 1 231 01 1 2 r2op i I B 119 20121 122 23124125 126 19 12D,f21 122.23±24125126 1 I I 1 C..J �y • 19• � 'i I I I ' I .I' I I I I I ! i- I S. zoo• t ®® �g®c L-!_- z5' z5' z5' 22,125,1 2*1 S.L c V. . `9@I�i0 6"�V ~_— 4�— b 99°S E' 60� y►g + � 'i--.. �w 19 - ` t0I k25&ATIDM es rro�3{7 T AMENDED RflD 79-19s I 52 0 I --T--I--r -r -1- r T -r- T-T- w 001 39 I I O 51do 1 I 1 1 I z 'MXw- 2500 CWCruw - A 1 112 3, '4 1516171,8 i i I. I I 1 I z I I I'- 1 i 1 i I 'F I I n 4so0 - 1' _ I - 4700 �- Z I 1 _ I i i v I I I I 1 1 m I I I I I 1 1 1 21 31.415I6I7 8 sol 200 L J_::� 3 I I I I 1 v i I i f 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I sC00 D . 9_3901 - - 36- 0 5000 5300 5500 5 7ft SEE'.MAP I 0 - - - -- -- �`'� 9 6100 35 -18 F 29 1 IAB -- -- 35 u - -� -10 }- - { 34 _ 4900 - 300. - - - - - -- - ssw l 12 33 e5800 --__ 640012 fi 33_ w+qo 900 -- _ _ _ + - 00 Li t _32 csoo - - -r31 -I. __ Tr g 0 14 IS _ 30 S �� -- ---- g -�- - ---r� J-`' - 3 - iaJ =ssoo - t- 15 - 30 - 16 4100 29 60 - - -- - -- - - -_ _ _ ---I — 16 —-C——29 17 28. ---- 1 - -- - - - -� a -- - T - 18 - - 27 - - - -- -= - - -- --j > �- --�- .- 4300T.T -'- 1 z B 1.9120 21 1221231241'2512 II I: I I ts11 ' I I I 1 I 1192DI21122Iz3i241 126 �+ ®qp ,f°E52N CO.IU.1002 EWN CO 80.1500 . 011E ca-m Wim. c 9104 S.Y�. T; FR � } _ 5oz J ,9 zs ze z5 2 za zs' a'i m• A 91061 I 9103 1 I 8390 I 1 82b0) ~ -8100 I I � 7�q- S I 67Qp I �• \~ �- 1 2 3 1 5 16 1 7 18 I 11 I 8 I I i f 18 f I I I 11 -1 I 1 12Ig.�4. 5.1817:18 , 1 I I I I 1 1_ I i S 1. 1 1 1" 11 � 36 9 36- 35t. a _ — --_— --.— .. - « 10 _ - 6900 10 35 u 59100-I1 - 9107 34 _ - E500 - - -1_ _ _ 12 33 34 2 13 - - - - 1 32 :8700-- p--- UD G 70oo to 32 Q a •I4 31 ---- - - - 76pp +--— v J - �. - -- — i- �- ' •' 8800.- ,:,>••'- _ -- 14 ... 7100.. v - 9186 28 8900 '- - - "` - -- - q6 - - - i7 - 4 ZZOO T-T T-+-T -i"-1 _- -101 1,23124.25 . te I I �- (.. I 11 r - ��•-T . '..-._ ;� L�_-'I in>``;,h' 1 i. ,� � 2425 a - - 3 11121.1111'l zs' w' r - y ;esa e5'tR. I W.` G A �. o AA - S f. Y I11114111111i1i1111y1'Iy111111I1I11111IrI111t1111111`1111�1�Tr)I�Ifll�llllflrl(IITII�r'IIIIIIII1i1111111fr1 Jill NOTE: 11 ff NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED - I 2 Y s - LESS CLEhH THAN - 6 7 8 9 ID 11 iG THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. OE 62 82 LZ 92 SZ 42 EZ Z2 IZ 02 61 81 LI 91 Sfbl EI ZI II 01 6 8 L 9 S b E Z r DJB INC. 115155 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 U.S.A. (503) 639-2900 C� 14, i'9 33 /zc:.rzei- d - t .t1LL6 %u__c iLec_zip-, % _ 22 - Can✓ eiL��s%u c i'.-_�_ r:c�. ll _ 75- , `Cv.E C=dl�Ul.?.0 I-tca 4-cc t-tlad aLyz /:riF.r,C'i?✓-5 g,' Fe--JLLIL>lU,= 25, 7iV3 -!1'L "ou's i^.�C'-C��:." an r� •r.,J3 2, 79C) CSS �LatL cl.LCr �e� ez t71_ Lc:nc .xfr� Fr2c� Jl c, cr _' oz!^ 2e.eta�3 rrr- e :�c>,irL -. ,:. (=7 ::orLi.�n. �sarite C-6 FOI-11 ✓r c. i rlw' izr_:eters. e_'. J t .i�S or t� tt,� ZZs.`c 1zc tr^ c `` t:';� cz �z '�, t Jc�.z FiLczn,'�_etrz aru' CJin g Lr-z .ta nece_ive i,'L� riz .z Ccrz��ci _ cemsic�r uan_ illi f�1 Ircr u.rre 1 „ r r cer�v.� ,Loo.tic. Lt.�.�Sar �s ✓Lan,�LtrL a.r..o rJ� tJalL_f:: r•-t✓✓ c^�r:>n�zec:. o -tCl arly_ Lensar��S ,✓rte/�erLu>? �'-- cam_C' lrc;tt c�cT �. nufne ttlzc..t auiL -i z I., a F.=aad :'.,.: , trfu c!'a '3.2'-_rZ4 - a e ,s n��. o �r BSc lire aS.z t zt s 4_7rz 0_23Lrert far'i:'z.;..v 30'a3 �•'✓s �: o_' l.Lr�r z� Buz atm. �✓La��uc .ice _isz a FLaar! J�_CLtJZ Otis .fEJ� C'. CT2 C_l'cr'2iS .6arle r(LC. ZG Z'e 0,- <i.^_-.'_ .60 Ld -Z-r- ZG !�w^ fL7_- tCd 0-6 .du_ciz a-c Cr_:I: a I.i_rC"Lcz .in rziu r. .,';'Le ''ni-'cz J3q, Lez a�_act; ' ;a urzcLe�L , 1 1 r n n »!r �L-C�LEd .If �(1Jr.11;:`t�_ I!-0'LL JJ7�:_ltC.l'l� f L(' l'�.� ^J?L✓.�2 -t 2,". �r'i!T '�r: J^. 7n_n�Si_�",r D_pau.E�^�F (naz' 'P' z .u2an 20 c,- ric,� ......:-.r !0) pCz-, az .d!?L_L+ i'. CL.;�OZa.°..ZcE.P QiS_ r. a _c_on c:LtLan_g_t- CL32 -iJL !Le :-U'.C:;.[u' i: � -L�� CIt. Jf �iaL-a2 ` ^ .Lb•C.d -!lZ . a'lt . . .,....a.._.� to e LCL tAc F�aaf' !,]Z r✓:' -'.at✓L fzr&,,ezi zaru,'.,'L ` y iiJ.e aE' a�ttat/,,_ CLL:.! a�,: 7,L':C"-!L'_ CLS.L'ti (JL G'` /.7.C_-i3 J,;�r^ ,� .,._c c•r„ k �.r 7970 i�z. rzcL� alzaLrrz �a i° �I': ;..rt FiLc� r c1Lr_e, ,-tLc� d6mb-a D-L1Lc_c'to", u Lc/z 6 lolj.'a:l t iL ntutr u nit attc iz ou -f o��.._ r irz f' LrLc%zip`_ : a. lL r fl .r S. -"J. DC✓L&Zcatt"' anc-, CLQ: ' a L TJJ2C. LrC JLG7lJ nth % .. t-J.i U�,C «. �7s fr�f�G!�✓'S?l-�L?/Cr?:✓.T�z✓'�^j1;LePLlcL�:oCC1J/n G 7llL 7C9?2872a1 , 7668 .t ' CJ7 r7i ' C'G'2LaLfl7zra� c� Rap ✓ 3e- a/z-- a-tzalJ..C12f'. 1Lal f_C2 a;n ry -6 a ^CLQ �JLC7Z c1CiSr�LJl JJJR C'u.L�S JU/LU,CIZ-5 C"i i''LUlC.'2 7, 7983, arruz J lzfv; _, t.,u_th rs .tar.,,i r.•.r>.� tL� car �C� e .cc-zuc _;° ;-au clsi�t e to aee t; a ao af� c.'Led cute a� ruz� 7 S 7 6 t7J` :.� r 2 7 7 .=u' f� �e�' / �,�'` 79c;3 17 r .Se�s r ' ) 7, / Lan_ �G1t c%7r2� cru:: ��.: a:: �stlzvevr day.^ j1,_ rrcur L'-c�LLe ar /"Sdat^.d T s , Jv. L• �e_i and rLer�x r,ec1 -6CJc is;LirL_man Ccu L-bb arz :nom! 22, 7981. 1/,a Aa-t'- .tile-.z-- me '2z alL .i c n a zr wrt r-ru:.' clo lzo.t sizot.r au , �z r�z.�r .tts r c_f °rlae r.Lr,-:la Cts c' map ovL .CJLc •an-e- m_,3rCL BIJ2 C'.rll..e,�0-(LO'R %/LCTTLaiSC' 1970. i� .-/SE'_ I.'F.".;?r' j jN n �• rr!' 1'%> ,.r dc.C,ba a.ttC'.-Cl:P..d -L.d j.CITC�'.r /'ladCLLC nap, 82-7 t�.r , ILLG� l,I.o .%s7Z �.C? :^,•-r:.l.(.� nf•!,'J' n n _�•:,.fr- - 1 tlG-�l G !L!'L/LtltP._ Irl' CJL' /2�-e.[_IL r7,_9 7 11 Q,L,'.' Lr eyMT nn�t,3n_.e�A. n� I-C2 tl�Jty .ta .gee -tom&i /zt .ca :V o f 82-2 0,w- -an L.c.'.ru%sa-t llaaci c 4,t SLrz:e tre arz<l� Azva anz c ai'ai. Urz u-,,-ht .ta .er , t/uz docu� at a l:CYT iiG� PLC�;� DJB INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 U.S.A. (503) 639-2900 RJf.L G'." 15-ci2 - la�Lcn. 7`, 1983 nne 2 .0 &cznt •-.O' lkJ2-i!�CiIZ '-ir .':I. Ii.CIl .Gi':.� .�1'✓S-i :".'�:lJ IJG'�.�2�5 C _C�T/L�.,!' <:-C7CL� 2 i7�is P'�.^._(?��'�._.'.% IL the ¢'.u..0 O aw-eC-6 z hown arc %n� e: za;z e�z az nruce�u� 29, 1903 a d .s m� rr� tlw a_ :tr�rz c Lsa � z': n;f%n trrr� af' "rzi�s %zL' rza t ahoy: the z how� rn-Uve uur do c.�a rTru: Zz. - a c-t 11I2 to i.'a %_L %rte Jt r�i.21J IL' -SCT. /-L(c✓zf7lL(X/u%7L.;Z!' F.LItLL� �1.e La�X. :%Azuz cruzi�zor�zelz tcr�Jm.12a'ct S. e - i'a c i ;' iu.iu x r - Jr t_e1Qz, -� 5 Grc c fznx�, !1u u�or�ch orzc' :Ja�twu,t arz Coccn CJs, va�:urze 1, Srz:rr �, ar c'`Va ua T.e 2 note fizvu. t:e ,t'z•s•e cti^= as -z Ccat-cc- IvLa.�. arzd r_amr ewe `�iuz�t�d �J, ✓JJ, anL'� %JJJ, 7 �r i rte° y^ori - Ilo�u;>e 2, crzc.' par-az -tc 75, 3nxa&4 .i z, S1cuz!^anl s - 1/ac ulze 1, zr1 z e2e u tc c ier' f�c ta, :- e ''2, t Kealz, GDil 15-02 e_rz �� a;° Ttrcamu' 4zeca� is l cr t ^s at;�� t✓ .t ha -J•e Buz _� -Zvj' uz .to .taLt L�au at p,-el..Lc" it e a-660 ` �Lau2 a ��1 or �� t !� ;L?G� -�i r- - %I C;1? n lr�JLOT.,��.✓ _' ,7Q^17r t L d: �e6 t�a_ wet , e ✓ gIourd � �%c -ni ^ . % nan!'nem tt at-'va�cd .'_t -Lu..m/✓ �' rJ u,i r�a;z errs c. c e. Silzce �e i1 r Ate, r i r -n� er e �s�rnr ,, tlu a �,reefa CJe Zea �zve at r -rr ten c 1zan tr on.3 a� tJze Flwr�r anfzenti�_' 7rz�rz at S!, eru r��s, i a Fuze 7 cr�, ', 2nd a.t�t� h_clz eta .C_c mr c✓v` a t.'.i�s f c C f �irz .� `_, a° i E cctic n eco�zc• J.e. a-61,- that :,aa a,f 6.omrJz e ,^.tet a' �'✓i�s !u� rr_c is c.:ir�. the c' terl P7.A, 1977,J c rr --C i .th,- Ci u c a;. T Lf-,alu ;za--3 Zn %s n a��s ears lin. kt6a a.tta-rj ' -Z/ S. Jen t. a" Jr�t�r arz ea<�o�ri�s-i Suizue�L c.%a i,e� 7967 en ' zct+�la-ter' ijz 970 and 7975. e a afa thrz t �:�'ze t ue hr�e cc d urta u� �^arzc' i rz iz e t_o G''� 1>-02 tlws e�nn rszr:, aures .Ce t� a? F<.,4ac -L,,s 25, 1983, a;wl a rad^...a, . wwcz �� clo mss, ruin Fszvi�amens fir; rpt $A�z�:ellzen t a a.t%',-- , a✓s zJzL C as ;�a,- t t crus to c er ne: c.t a .t t nti cwt tie, arzd .tlae a.V�ztnz .('�n.,inn ruaruled y»•zt ,taruniat, •C.e rzac-�'c> ,-�..t a;; .tfws %zU'..e,i_c r'Ge�- Ct.tl- a;= Ti,,a,zd necoru' V G. L. lJC.1��, fLPJ1/S!ir1Ll.,�e1� Ge�u�_^din L. ice'j - '✓c cam- l�es 'e. t 1 t