City Council Packet - 11/22/1982 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign their name on the
NOVEMBER 22, 1982, 7:30 P.M. appropriate sign-up sheet(s) . If no sheet is
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL provided, ask to be recognized by the Chair.
LECTURE ROOM
1. SPECIAL MEETING:
1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 Call To Staff, Council & Audience For Non-Agenda Items Under Open
Agenda
2. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed for discussion and separate action. Motion to:
2.1 Approve Minutes - November 1, 1982
2.2 Approve the Expenditures and Investmcar�s: $ 322.410.37
2.3 Receive and File Financial Reports - �:.:tober, 1982
2.4 Receive and File Speed Control Board Report
2.5 Canvass Vote - 11/2/82 General Election
2.6 Approve and Authors:-+ Appropriate Signatures: Street Dedication -
Kenneth Dahl - SW Greenburg Road & 91st Avenue
2.7 Approve Letter & Authorize Signature of Mayor Regarding Plaid
Pantry - Durham & Hall
2.8 Receive and File Transmittal From Planning Department Regarding
Comp Plan Public Hearings Before Council
3. TOWN & COUNTY DAYS REPORT
• Presentation by Joe Schaffer
4. ORDINANCE No. 82- :.:.opting Findings and Conclusions - Tigard East
CPR (JB Bishop)
• Director of Planning & Development
PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF MEETING
5. KILLIAN STREET VACTION PUBLIC HEARING - PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM
10-25-82
• Recommendation of Director of Public Works
• Public Hearing Closed
• Council Consideration
6. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT ELEMENT - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC HEARING - CPA 5-82
A request by the City of Tigard to update the Comprehensive Plan, CITIZEN
INVOLVEMENT, to comply with LCDC Statewide Planning Goal *I.
• Public Hearing Opened
• Staff Report and Summary of Planning Commission Proceedings by
+ Director of Planning & Development
s Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
• Public Hearing Closed
• Council Consideration and Action (Ordinance No. 82- )
PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF MEETING CONCLUDED
7. LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES - LEGISLATIVE REPORT
® City Administrator
S. CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES DISCUSSION
s City Administrator
9. LID PROGRESS REPORTS
e City Administrator
10. COUNTY ROAD & FINANCE ISSUES - Acquire Jurdisdiction Discussion
• Director of Public Works
11. CONSULTING ENGINEER SELECTION & PRE-QUALIFICATION DISCUSSION
o Director of Public Works
12. AWARDS AND RECOGNITION DISCUSSION
e City Administrator
13. QUESTIONNAIRE & TAS INCREMENT FINANCE POLL DISCUSSION
S City Administrator
14. OPEN AGENDA-. Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chaareir
under item 1.3 will be discussed at this timo. thee. Ameetingll persons
encouraged to contact the City Administrator prior
15. �$ECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City
Council will go into Executive r'
and (1)(-f) to discuss acquisition of
Session under ORS 192-660 (1)(e)
real property
and pending litigation. '
16. AD3OURNKENT
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 22, 1982
T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L
f
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - NOVE14BER 229 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
I. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors John Cook, Nancie
Stimler (left at 9:41 P.M.), and Kenneth Scheckla; Director of
Public Works, Frank Currie; Finance Director/City Recorder,
Doris Hartig; City Administrator, Bob Jean; Director of
Planning & Development, William Monahan; Legal Counsel, Ed
Sullivan; Office Manager, Loreen Wilson.
2. CALL TO STAFF, COUNCIL & AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA
(a) City Administrator requested that the canvass of votes from the
11-2-82 election and item 412 awards and recognition discussion be
pulled from the agenda and that the following items be added to open
1
agenda: f
.1 NPO #5 REQUEST - CPR
.2 COUNCIL RETREAT
.3 PARK BOARD APPOINTMENT
.4 ANGELYNN SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION
.5 72ND AVENUE SEWER EASEMENT & QUIT CLAIM i
.6 STREET DEDICATION - TIGARDVILLE HEIGHTS
.7 CITY OF TUALATIN AGREEMENT - DEQ TESTING
i
i
(b) John Smets spoke regarding his concerns on the NPO #5 membership and
balance of business representatives on the committee.
(c) Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, reported he was speaking for himself,
not NPO #3, and requested Council extend the time frame for adoption
of the Comp Plan.
3. APPROVE MINUTES - NOVEMBER 1, 1982
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
4. APPROVE THE EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: $ 322,410.37
F
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
r
5. RECEIVE AND FILE FINANCIAL REPORTS - OCTOBER, 1982
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve. {
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. f
6. RECEIVE AND FILE SPEED CONTROL BOARD REPORT
f
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
PAGE 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1982
7. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATE SIGNATURES: Street Dedication, Kenneth
Dahl, SW Greenburg Road and 91st Avenue.
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
8. APPROVE LETTER AND AUTHORIZE SIGNATURE OF MAYOR REGARDING PLAID PANTRY
STORE LOCATION - SW Hall & Durham Road.
(a) Mike Marr, 14445 SW 87th Court, apologized to Staff for any
mistatements which he may have made last Council meeting. He also
requested Mayor be authorized to sign letter to OLCC.
(b) Phil Pasteris, NPO #6, stated there was a vote at the NPO meeting to
deny the OLCC application at Hall & Durham.
(c) Steve Janik, Attorney representing Plaid Pantry, requested a public
hearing on the issue before Council. He wished to develop facts and
advise the Council of Plaid Pantry's position.
(d) Faith Holmes, NPO #6, filed with Council a petition from surrounding
property owners expressing their displeasure with the Hall & Durham
location for Plaid Pantry Stores.
(e) Art Biggs, citizen, expressed his concern with the proposed location
on Hall and Durham.
(f) Legal Counsel stated he felt that any hearing regarding this issue
would be before OLCC and not the City Council.
(g) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to authorize
the Mayor to sign a letter to OLCC expressing Council's desire to
have the liquor license for that Hall/Durham location cancelled.
Approved by a 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor
Scheckla voting nay.
9. RECEIVE AND FILE TRANSMITTAL FROM PLANNING DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMP PLAN
PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE COUNCIL.
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to receive
and file.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
10. TOWN AND COUNTRY DAYS REPORT
(a) Mr. Joe Schaffer, Chairman of the Town and Country Days Committee,
presented a verbal report to Council regarding the 1983 celebration.
He stated the Committee has decided to use the same name for the
pageant, but will change the date from August to May. The Committee
is requesting City assistance in obtaining more parking area in the
adjacent field by Cook Park for the celebration. Mr. Schaffer also
filed a financial report with the Council.
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1982
11. KILLIAN STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING - Hearing continued from 10-25-82.
(a) Director of Public Works requested Council continue the public
hearing until after the executive session later in the meeting.
(b) No one in the audience objected to this recommendation.
(c) Consensus of Council was to continue until after the executive
session.
12. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT ELEMENT - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC HEARING - CPA 5-82
A request by City of Tigard to update the Comprehensive Plan, CITIZEN
INVOLVEMENT, to comply with LCDC Statewide Planning Goal #1.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Associate Planner, Jeremy Coursolle, presented the Citizen
Involvement element to the Council, noting that Planning Commission
had approved it at a recent meeting.
(c) Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak.
(d) Associate Planner recommended approval with changes as follows: _
2.1.1 Strategies - the word 'will' be changed to 'shall' .
2.1.2 Strategies - the word 'should' be changed to 'shall' .
(e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) ORDINANCE NO. 82-77 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITIZEN
INVOLVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE TIGARD
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
(g) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt as
amended.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
13. LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES - LEGISLATIVE REPORT
(a) City Administrator reported issues presented at the League Convention
and noted that the following amendments to the Oregon Municipal
Policy or Legislative Resolutions were passed.
Revenue and Taxation - Cities should be allowed more flexibility and
local options, no restrictions on current resources. ..reduce property
tax dependence and property tax exemptions.
Ethics - Simplify reporting, code of ethics.
Municipal Court - Some State funding regarding mandates.
Air Pollution - Local flexibility and State help.
Ic PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1982
Double Taxation - County services of primary benefit to limited areas
should be financed by those areas, not County-wide.
Resolution on Property Tax Reduction and Sales Tax - Support
Constitutionally limited sales tax to replace and reduce property
taxes.
Resolution on Land Use Planning - No new LCDC goals for awhile and
simplify appeals.
Ltesolution on Federal Revenue Sharing - Continue.
Resolution on Transportation - Develop highway funding proposal with
State.
Resolution on Collective Bargaining - Allow local selection of
impasse resolutions other than binding arbitration: final offer
arbitration, strike, others agreed upon by union and City. . .also,
limit arbitration to issues presented by the parties.
Resolution on Growth Costs - Develop CIP funding program and grant
increased annexation authority to UGB.
Public Contracting - Oppose mandates, retain local decision option of
City Council.
Resolution on Anti-Trust Immunity - Grant cities same immunities as
State has.
City Administrator requested Council endorse the League's resolutions.
(b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to support
the League of Oregon Cities positions on resolutions except for the
sales tax issue.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.,
14. CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES DISCUSSION
(a) City Administrator reported that after careful study and
consideration he would recommend Council authorize a retainer
agreement to hire a staff attorney which would be working at City
Hall 4 hours per day and at Ed Sullivan's office 4 hours a day
effective January 1, 1983.
(b) After further discussion by Council and staff, Councilor Cook moved
to hire a staff attorney, Susan Schneider, effective 1-1-83 without a
written contract with a review of the position during the 1983-84
budget process. Motion seconded by Councilor Scheckla.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1982
15. RESOLUTION NO. 82-132 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A
FINAL ORDER REGARDING THE APPLICATIONS FILED BY JB
BISHOP FOR REVISION TO THE NPO #1 COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AND CONCOMITANT ZONE CHANGE (CPR 4-82 AND ZC
18-82.)
(a) Director of Planning and Development gave history of issue and stated
that agreement between the neighbors and Mr. Bishop has been reached
regarding the conditions to be attached to the project except for
Condition #4 dealing with the fencing and buffer zone around the
property.
(b) Steve Janik, Attorney for Mr. Bishop, stated that Mr. Bishop was
interested in getting the project underway, but could not condone
different fence types for each residential property owner.
(c) Carolyn Eaton, 13645 SW Steven Court, stated that the fence and
buffer zone must be improved before construction begins.
(d) Lengthy discussion followed regarding the fence and buffer zone
issues. Council called a recess to give the parties a chance to work
out the wordage.
RECESS: 9:24 P.M.
RECONVENE: 9:37 P.M.
(e) Legal Counsel read the following change into the record. (NOTE: the
added language is underlined.)
Condition #4: The applicant shall, in the Site Design Review
process, address the need for buffering of the proposed development
from residential properties to the east of the subject property,
including the possible need for fencing in such buffer area. Such
buffering, as is determined in the Site Design Review process to be
appropriate, including a six foot high chain link fence with slats so
as to be site obscuring, shall be substantially constructed prior to
the issuance of building permits.
i
6
(f) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt
F
as amended. I
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
COUNCILOR STIMLER LEFT: 9:41 P.M.
16. LID PROGRESS REPORT
F
(a) Director of Public Works gave a brief update on the LID's that are
not completed as of this date.
PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 222 1982
17. COUNTY ROAD & FINANCE ISSUES - Acquire Jurisdiction Discussion
(a) Director of Public Works discussed the issues of road jurisdiction at
great lengtn with Council. City Administrator stated that the City
should ask the County to complete their overlay program before any
roads are acquired for maintenance.
(b) Consensus of Council was to have staff prepare list of streets which
aren't controversial and bring back for Council action to request
jurisdiction in the near future.
18. CONSULTING ENGINEER SELECTION AND PRE-QUALIFICATION DISCUSSION
(a) Director of Public Works submitted list to Council of the engineers
which the City has been using on projects.
(b) After some discussion, consensus of Council was to remove the firm of
R.E.I. from .he list, revise the list to include 10 firms to be used
by the City and present at a Council meeting in December.
(c) Mayor Bishop suggested staff consider the firm of Robert E. Meyer on
the list.
19. QUESTIONNAIRE & TAX INCREMENT FINANCE POLL DISCUSSION
(a) City Administrator submitted the revised questionnaire. After some
further direction from Council, the Administrator stated this would
be mailed within the next couple of weeks.
20. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair
under item 1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged
to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting.
20.1 NPO #5 REQUEST - CPR - City Administrator noted that NPO #5 has
requested a CPR to change the corner of Hall and Durham to not allow
a Plaid Pantry Store. NPO #5 and Council consensus was that this
could be handled in a more timely fashion if this was addressed
during the Comp Plan Hearings.
20.2 COUNCIL RETREAT - After some discussion, Council consensus was to
hold the retreat on December 12, 1982 from 10 AM to 5 PM and that not
more than $500 would be spent from the Council's budget for Helen
Terry to attend the retreat and assist.
20.3 PARK BOARD APPOINTMENT - Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by
Councilor Scheckla to appoint Pat Biggs as the School RepresenL-tive
on the Park Board. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council
present.
20.4 RESOLUTION NO. 82-133 RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
NULLIFYING THE ANGELYNN SUBDIVISION
COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT AND RELEASING THE
PERFORMANCE BOND THEREFORE.
Motion by Councilor Cook seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
PAGE 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1982
20.5 72ND AVENUE SEWER EASEMENT & QUIT CLAIM - PAC WEST - Director of
Public Works requested Council approval. Motion by Councilor Cook,
seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve and authorize appropriate
signatures. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
20.6 STREET DEDICATION - TIGARDVILLE HEIGHTS - THOMPSON - Director of
Public Works requested Council approval. Motion by Councilor
Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve, authorize
appropriate signatures, and authorize payment of $1,260. for the
dedicated property. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
20.7 AGREEMENT - CITY OF TUALATIN - DEQ TESTING - Director of Public Works
stated that the City of Tigard could receive DEQ testing for vehicles
at a reduced rate by entering into the agreement for City of Tualatin
to conduct the tests and recommended approval. Motion by Councilor
Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to authorize signature of
contract. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
21. EXECUTIVE SESSION: At 10:58 P.M. the Tigard City Council went into
executive session under ORS 192.660 (1)(e) and (1)(f) to discuss
acquisition of real property and pending litigation.
11:06 P.M. RECONVENE REGULAR SESSION
22. RESOLUTION NO. 82-134 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NECESSITY AND PURPOSE
FOR ACQUISITION OF A CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE
72ND AVENUE AREA LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT,
DIRECTING AN ATTEMPT TO AGREE WITH THE OWNERS AS TO
COMPENSATION THEREFORE, AND AUTHORIZING
CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS TO ACQUIRE SAID
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
(a) Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
(b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to continue
the vacation public hearing for Killian to January 10, 1983.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
23. ADJOURNMENT: 11:08 P.M.
-xz,7�
City Recorder -- Cit Tigard
ATTEST:
Mayor - City of Tigard
PAGE 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 22, 1982
Date November 22, 1982
I wish to testify before the Tigard City
Council on the following item:
(Please print your name)
1.3 Call To Staff, Council & Audience For Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda
Name, Address & Affiliation Item Description
All
Ire 513
�J'/-tom J-;7 —
L
-;7 —
s
I Hill
s
f
I
0
f
E�
■It va�c 11-22-82
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your nave)
Item Description: 5. KILLIAN STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC FEARING CONTINUED FROM 10/25/82
R
roponent (for) Opponent (against) r
ime, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
a
t
r
L
r
P
f
3
i
i
x
F
6
PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL
T PROGRAM BUDGET NOVEMBER 22, 1982
Community Services
Police 11 ,406.56
a
Finance & Records 1 ,585. 18
Y
Municipal Court 853.80 .
Library 610.96
i
Social Services
is
4
4'
Total Community Services 14,456.50 k
Community Development
Public Works 62,781 .31
4
Planning & Development 820.29
Total Community Development 63,601 .60
f
Policy & Administration
Mayor & Council 498.34
t
r
Administration 402.71 r
Total Policy & Administration 901 .05
City Wide Support Functions
Non—departmental 19,244.76
Misc. Accounts (refunds & payroll deductions, etc.) 2, 162.59
i
Investments
r
t
DEBT SERVICE f
General Obligation Bond
i
Bancroft Bond & LID Expenses 165,586.52
r
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
r
Contract 56,457.35
r
l
ALL OTHER EXPENDITURES j
s
Civic Center Project
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS WRITTEN 322,410.37
ro
Oj 00
oc clco lo m
i
Y1 O �t In
N
�+ e
l�
o0 �
lo o -T �� - O oo gal
� � � � �
y N N O Cn
C
w N I� �-1 W �O
qc,
}i
14
U
f
E
i
"r
7
i
E
i
R1
z
H El
E4
i
tit E c j
H N W i
O O
H 1O
ooW
WO� i
Ul
p
U z a o cn r` e
w H o + o oo O
o n u
n u n
z o
W oD O O O O
w o C
W w N N + {
r� + + + + 1 + 4Fk
7V' U1 Hin 14 co C O j
0. H N N lin m l0 t�'f lO O I
fel N O V' N 01 .••` to N
Oj r--1 O1 h [•� C' 14 Ln m .-i r1 [� N t
� 04 r-H �O 'i H O h O1 co In O
ON H G
E
i
t�
aj
N N N N
�-
rd
Oi O i� f
C W y •.I •u $4
rd En ro O+ N Vr] In
�7 $$4 rt 4j tp Loper. y A Fp i
41 t
W .•-i C O N •.Oi ra Cil C O U "I ,rro
,� .H > > H P4 U 7 cG E QM •.��-1 i
w Iii vii H Q a m
W r-1 N in V' 7. �••i N t+1 C U ri 9 ri
RC H
u � N N N N
w -4 ri �q -4 z
�a t
G 1.
z
ti
y
ro
q _ nO W 00 oo �. � Om Na+I
w �,]
cn
ro o� o
ro
r4 ti
1ti
E N Ln 00 Ln 00
0N O
.. 4J0 p
n n n t"1 " Y O 00 0\ rn n
TN O N �? 00 �T co
4
'a
H
W
5
�a W
Z7 O
E U] O
H VI O OLn
n
n .-+ r1 co � n
H O O
1n N 1n N o
9:4
N II II II II II t
x 11 no ', 0 0 o t
W 00 10 O a0 O O o y
�p �D kp O
m n. c+1 O ""� '"� 16.
41
d 10 % Ln
' } } t t t t
14 n c� 1n v rn c 1n 1c n
cn f�+f O t0 N O In V' 01 l0m n t0
C9 [� 1D 111 m F d' O <D (� 01 10 1D Ol N
N ri .-i r-1 V' O 1n 01 co e q cN co 01 O
co 4 r O 1n 1n O a0 N
N r-1 r-I CT O
N
N � ,
1♦ D V
>y
E N 4d
ro 4.,
JJ H N
N 0! N 0 W
Hp, Hp aN E.
W y £D C U4. " .1 yx w 0 e e e
N1N
A
to j V 11 W •
yN % G
UI f15 �7
pH
o N S t°n M 3W3 o
U Ai r-1 N C1 a r-1 N c'�1 V' In l0
O UO to to 1n 14 rl rl 4 .4 .4 .-I N N N
FL
O
.i U W N N N N N N Al N N N
O
N �
f
1
°V' r
ro
AN cn � 1 �D M M1 'D O O
O CD N l N C " 0 w M C
y
i � M
01 O 1 W � In CO
ro
N
i
c
MI
1 M M 1 00
O M .-+ O O M1 M1 N O O
$4
77�
U
(W
O
O
[q
�r
Z O
E
93.
M O
1
o+ O O
yy O
y y N O
J T
H H � 10 � t
W WC.
II II
O
W L N O 4
M1
y ^ M
I
+ t t
y
m v o 0 o Ln 0 0 0 0 0
M p O 1� O U1 m
N O n O O O O O O O O M N H M H a H M m
[- 'i N r-1 ri
m ri
'•1
G
O
•.i
y
rd
H U
C W fi N
d N
ri .i ,[ •.1
U m N U O 11
C v 114
rn
O N CJ W •F UC y H U 'L
W In y U mG pG Na
I E U •� F y y y H V N ro 1� G H w b+ r-
tp
H rOS WO 1G1 £ N
H O 43
ri to 43 4%N O 0 W U JO
> H [
O >+ yW
y N O O O O co W
O O O O
La 45 V M -7 y, O r1 C',
M V' �!1 t0 m O O O .,1
u .?3: "G<s]•�: O —4 ri H r-1 14 X14 .p� X14 N N N N N M M M M
O a H N H Z iD 1 1 1 1 �O l0 l0
1 1
((rr]] '.{ .{ r-I rl .y rl r/ .y
Oa 4 M
4,
41
1
0 00 cn cn _r c
1� N .0 � �--� � O N� 00N �
ao
Sa L'l N w C\ N 10 Ol O v^ ANN
r-1
S. CD - cn 1 u'f r1 �� N�1
t0 W t+l N 1O �l CO aD
( C �l d cA �--� �Y' O
pT LI Ln M N
r-I Cl) N C
7
U
E
W
O
O
E z
O
H
E
H E W
E cn O
O � 1
U W O
C-4
N N
W v� M
a `^
w n n n
o O o
41 u1 O
...� N C-4
a t 4 t
W O O O O O O O O O N �n O O rn
p O O O O O U'1 O N .-1 r V' O Cl
N N Cil
N N .-� V' C' ^ N
dp �O N
O�
rl
J.3
C
H
Vl N
rl 0 0
d N W m RS
d rroroi
�sU[A H W43
@
a «' " w �' a w
W ,n w
U1 ri CC (� 30-1 s0� N
2 433 N U '�-I N C C rsl E E°v _ro
H 6
4 X11 y V 44. 3 O J-3 1J [L
L5 .i i3 ri d C 0 ro W W44 0
O
b 4 a H w $ o a ro ro ro
a�
y %C
rl N N f"1 O IA r W W LCl
p Q -J t'3 V� V' �Vp' 3�(p1 �M �co
0 aCpO O O (n
u ,(a7 CC too, to 101 1 1 1 1 t ^ E
O W O "1 .14 ri r4 -1 M N N
1:31 N an
W
E
O � In
v
�ro
1
ro
N
a
10.1 I I M
H
W
5
R7
CC��Wj ��Ey+j
E N O
O 'a 1 m s
N m m �
U � rn rn
n 00
W
It
11 11
a w
Wo. .a
ai s o
b N S
en n m
m m v
1 c m
N
m i0 N
ON n o
c
to
in U
W
W �
41 .d
4.1 aQ
H
u OH
U p
a
HIM a
ROU'i'1 NCS St.!P
j Accountant
j Admini s tra for
Bldg. Official
XX Director of P.W.
Librarian
Planner
XX Police Chief.
Recordeer•
P7.EARR ERVT
f
Please:
Type - draft ( ) Final ( )
Sign/Approve
Copy. (# )
Distribute
i e
XX R urn to me
ail
Read & Save
Read & Toss
See Me
_ Take Appropriate Action
Per Your Request
COMMENTS:
From Dd
t
ri
i
Lf
Oregon State Speed Control Board
VICTOR ATIYEN - [�
00"', TRANSPORTATION BUILDING, SALEM, OREGON 97310 pr
September 28, 1982
In Reply Refer to
File No.,
TRA 7-2
'r
Doris Hartig
City Recorder/Finance Director
City of Tigard
P. 0. Box 23397
Tigard, OR 97223
i
s
As requested in your letter of January 13, 1982, a speed zone
investigation has been conducted on the Beaverton-Tualatin i
Highway in the City of Tigard. A copy of the speed zone re-
port is enclosed.
Y
The report proposes to establish speed zoning as shown on the
enclosed Exhibit.
I
If this proposal meets with the City's approval , a speed zone s
order by delegated authority will be issued and a copy for- t
warded to you. Also, the State Highway Division will be noti-
fied to install the necessary signing.
If the City does not concur with the proposed zoning, the re-
port and the objection will be presented to the State Speed
Control Board at its next meeting. i
If no response is received from the City within sixty (60) #
days following receipt of this letter, no further action will
be taken concerning this speed zoning.
I
i
L. E. George j
Secretary
i
i
I
Enclosures
i
cc: Earl Reed
i
i
Form 73-4-1872
EXHIBIT
The Secretary of the State Speed Control Board proposes to rescind Order
No. 3538, dated May 20, 1981 , and establish speed zoning under delegated
authority on the Beaverton-Tualatin Highway, in the City of Tigard, as
follows:
40 MPH from 0.12 mile E of SW Nimbus Avenue (M.P. 2.57) to 0.14
mile N of SW Pfaffle Street (M.P. 4.55) . 1/ 2/
40 MPH from 0.14 mile N of SW Pfaffle Street (M.P. 4.55) to
0.12 mile N of SW Pfaffle Street (M.P. 4.57) . 3/
t
40 MPH from 0.12 mile N of SW Pfaffle Street (M.P. 4.57) to 100
feet N of SW Pfaffle Street (M.P. 4.67) . 2/
30 MPH from 100 feet N of SW Pfaffle Street (M.P. 4.67) to 450
feet S of SW Burnham Street (M.P. 5.62) . 4/
45 MPH from 450 feet S of SW Burnham Street (M.P. 5.62) to S.W.
Durham Road (M.P. 7.07) . 4/
40 MPH from SW Hall Boulevard (M.P. 7.07) to SW Upper Boones
Ferry Road (M.P. 7.71 ) . 1/ 4/
35 MPH from SW Durham Road (M.P. 7.71) to NCL of Durham (0.20
mile N of SW Findlay Road (M.P. 7.85) . 4/ 3
1/ Except that in the following sections, the designated speed
shall be 20 MPH when children are present, as per the provi-
sions of Subsection 2.a. , of ORS 487.470:
From: 400 feet N of S41 Locust Street (M.P. 4.01 )
To: 400 feet S of SW Locust Street (M.P. 4.18)
r
From: 0.15 mile E of SW 85th Avenue (M.P. 7.22) s:
To: 100 feet W of SW 79th Avenue (M.P. 7.37)
2/ In Washington County only (Oregon Transportation Commission
Jurisdiction) .
3/ Centerline of roadway coincident with the city limits of Tigard.
4/ Within the city limits of Tigard.
ORJGON STATE' ;`sGH,1AY DIVISION
Report of Speed Zone Investigation
Beaverton-Tualatin Highway
City of Tigard and Washington County
Hwy. No. 141 , M.P. 2.57 to M.P. 7.85
SSCB & OTC
September 10, 1982
Recommendation: Rescind OTC Order No. 816, dated August 23, 1979, and SSCB Order
No. 3538, dated May 20, 1981 , and establish the following speed zones:
Existing Recommended
Section
"A" From: 0.12 mile east of S.W. Nimbus Ave. M.P. 4.55 2.57 40 MPH 40 MPH 1/ 2/
to: 0.14 mile north of S.W. Pfaffle St.
"A" From: 0.14 mile north of S.W. Pfaffle St. M.P. 4.55 40 MPH 40 MPH 3/
To: 0.12 mile north of S.W. Pfaffle St. M-P_ 4.57
M.P. 4.57 40 MPH 40 MPH 2/
To:
"A" From: 10north
00 ft. northof S.W.WPfaffle lSt. M.P. 4.67
100 ft. north of S.W. Pfaffle St. M.P. 4.67 30 MPH 30 MPH 4/
"B" From: i
To: 450 ft. south of S.W. Burnham St. M.P. 5.62
E
7
"C" From: 450 ft. south of S.W. Burnham St. M.P. 5.62 45 MPH 45 MPH 4/
To: S.W. Durham Road 14-P- 7.07
a
t
"p�� From: S.W. Hail Blvd. M•P• 7.07 45 MPH 40 MPH 1/ 4/
M.P. 7.71 k
Invest. To: S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Rd. ;
E
"D" From: S.W. Durham Road M.P. 7.71 35 MPH 35 MPH 4/
To: NCL of Durham (0 20 mile north of M.P. 7.85 t
S.W. Findlay Rd-5
M.P.
From: M.P.
To:
M.P.
From: M.P.
To:
M.P.
From: M.P.
To:
M.P.
From:
M.P.
To:
s, theExcept that in the following sectrp4isions ofsSubsection 2ated aa h 2when
of CRS4S7 470
children are present as per the g
From:
400 ft. north of S.W. Locust St. M.P. 4.01
To: 400 ft. south of S.W. Lucust St. M.P. 4.18
From:
0.15 mile east of S.W. 85th Ave. M.P. 7.22
100 ft. west of S.W. 79th Ave. M.P. 7.37
To:
M.P.
From: Y.P.
To:
2/ In Washington County only
3/ Centerline of roadway coincident with the City Limits of Tigard
4/ Within the City Limits of Tigard
j
Page 2
Historical Background:
Investigation reTiested by Ms. Doris Hartig, City Recorder/Finance Director for the
city of Tigard
Requested speed Not stated
Previous Action: Established OTC Order No. 816 on August 23, 1979 and SSCB Order f
No. 3538 on May 20, 1981.
Investigation: Section "D"
. f
Section Length 0.64 Miles
85% Speed 41 ,97MPH
1980 Accident Rate-* 2.21
1980 Average Daily Traffic 7,750 Vehicles 4
Culture Type & Density Moderate Residential
-- -- -Horizontal Alignment 3 mild to sharp curves
Vertical Alignment Mildly undulating
Curve Signs & Speed Riders Yes
Existing Posted Speeds 45MPH
Recommended Speed 40MPH s
F
* Accidents per Pillion Vehicle Miles
Roadway Data:
A.
Surface Bituminous
Width 22 to 26 feet
Lanes 2 R
parking Not restricted
Shoulders 2 to 6 foot gravel
Intersecting Streets 3 a
Paved 1 s
d
Stopped 3
Signalized 0
r
Accident Data:
Stucky Period 1-1-78 to 12-31-81
Total Accidents 29 €
Injuries 22
Fatalities 0
1980Accidents 4
1980Accident Rate (R) 2.21 '
1980State Rate (r) jj 3.47
Deviation (R-r) 0
d.
F.
V Suburban Secondary State Highway t
r.
IMMURKARM
SIM
Page 3
Slot Speed Data: Section "D"
85% Speed 41 .97MPH
Pace Limits 33-43MPH
�G in Pace 78.9
Nazi mum Speed 53
Posted Speed 45MPH
Yo Exceeding Posted Speed 4.5% '
Computed Speed 41 .97MPH
Recommended Speed 35MPH
i
Ten-mile-per-hour range containlno the largest number of sampled vehicles
- - 859 Speed minus deviation
Factors Influencing Recommendation:
f
85% speed, accident history, roadside culture, and roadway alignment.
f
E
}
E
i
4
r
1 Le rsTnL7, rTomM
1 ;4' LAKE
TIGAR
�I .o. O SII'
j f..d. -1_ '""'� � :I :�L.•�zJ S�cC c� � �t 1//.90
' C TIGAR) --.�°o
,..vo
� ma `••.'I � P�j 1 ,�� ,�•rro`
_ __DURHAM ::
�� ° _ _- J,I ......<• � � vov.s,o. =/ II '<- i(�
211
N TUALATIN
P°y.8,900 —
% -a J,)
PL
' 1 LTJ
- � 35 !rl P� lam- �• "'- : % '/�
y0 �`�=��`•il lam• _ _�;` I 1►
SCALE
2000 0 2000 4000 6000 FEET
POST OFFICE ® PUBLIC BUILDING
SCHOOL COURT HOUSE
CITY CENTER u16 CITY HALL 600 0 600 1200 1800 METERS
—.2-CITY LIMITS M ARMORY
---PUBLIC AREA J LIBRARY
For � ho �o
� xhibi � 5
See EDunc- I
I in
c�
0
v,
T
Q
11.1
Q
E i
U U ,
Q1
painful suasiad
c3a
Pat ON suos�ad
c a6ou�oQ •do�d —
W u- f
c, N io:o.4-ucr�
Q
C3 104D..4
F-•- S1iDiSi-i�0� -i-i�l j C i� ni cel
snoau;.iiaosiN
uj �- uaielsapad
J 1
Lu
Q fz uoisiiIOD-UON
Ljr
Z bulmiod
U o -
5uiujn i
(� @ui�ioiJanp i I
o ad:MsapiS
buidaai*j
L3C adiMsapis ( !
pug-goad
Quo-poay
=V' ai6ub ! I
- C-
�
— `
-- - -
cn z
LLJ
t y
d >, o � i 4
WIC®iOit® ®fW1�W1WW WYlS® ss
IRWIN
55
Cf)
• Y
C a n <
LLJ
O 1.i y
CL
Q�
• painful suosJad
QJ
POI HN suosJad
Wa6owO�
:«= Q Io1o_4—LION
IDID
�-- SNOISI1100 11y RS cx 0 �• C�
� 1
sr.Oauollaoslvy I
s �
W uoIaasapad
w
Q CL uoIsIIIOO—uoN
i
i Z 6ul.4jod
U f �
6J:ujn1I t
Z J 6u��lo�aa�p
® > O ac1l'As8PIS
Fn
6u.4aayl
2dimsaplc
pua—joaa
I
do—pOaH R1
3
Z ai6ub
t0
LLI
ZZ
�_ �- .� cc � u Lam• � ,`�. v
z
,� : m �, E
Kamm
' v
' c
i
v
Q 4!
ME
0 LAJ w
U —
E
� o v
� o
Q+
C: painful suosiad
CD
palllN suosJad
C: abowDa -d Dad
w u-
'v= t G l a l0 j--uo l•.' I r a
Z � loio�
SiVl�lsl-1�0� Ylt1
^
sv
Y J
J snoa:iDilaosiyy ! 1
bunpDd
LLJ uDisisapad I 1
n
--
loalq,✓-paxi� N�
Q uols!H0:)-uoN 1
6upliod
V � �
i bu!ulny
Z bu i-4DilaAo
0 O adtmsapl:;
1 u bui/aarj I —
2diarsap!S i
pua-iDaa
1
Quo-pDaH
� albud
O C
0 1r ►- .1
r.
o
L) v c`n cL �.`_ �' t�
0
Y
[Y.
O a �
LLJ
O CL I m
Cm
c pain;u! suos�ad 1 ,— ;r'.
.L
N
pall!K suosjad
L J Li 05OUJop 'dOJd
ca to 1DIDJ-uo? _f
;,.. Q
� J
p V 1DIDZ 1
O t
CP3 i
U) snoauollaoslyll —
� 6ulHaog
E j
LL! uolJIsapad !
i
,t } ua1s11103—uonl i
W buIMIJCd
J � z
V � Q
_ bu!uan_L
Z 111 i J b�.uo��anp
O > O adpMsaplS
V
bugaayy n
d� adlrn_ap!s
® � pua—inaa 1 1 !
Q 1
UO-PDOH
_ � atbutt ► � .
LLD Q .—
QellU) z
Z =-' ccr-
�- 3
uj
co
j w
ca u w = U- - � ii
ROAD OR STREET: SW DURHAM ROAD DATE • THURSDAY 9 AUGUST 19. 1982
HWY NO. 141
r,i CITY OR COUNTY: TIGARD TIME : 9:55 AM TO 10 :45 AM
I GENERAL LOCATION: 250 FEET WEST OF WEATHER : FAIR — DRY
SW 79TH AVENUE
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: -F_AST- AND- WEST
CUMULATIVE
! PERCENT
15t
17! 100—'- +
96
•92
84 +
80 +
'131 76------ +
;_ 72
"� 68 ¢
I 60 +
56 +
! . 48
zc.
44 -----
zz;
36 +
32 `
24 ; {
zs 2 0
12 +.
•
_ 0. . . .+. . . . 10. . .+. . . .20. . .+. . . .30. . .+. . . .40. . .+ . . . .50. . .+. . . .60. . . + . . . .70 �
1 % EXCEEDING 100 100 100 98 74 25 5 1 0 0 0 0
!35;
E
— -- _
SPEED__ --------- -(MPN) — -- --- - ---- —
r C
EAST BOUND WEST ROUND
—17-- ------------
:V
85% SPEED 41 .97 41 .82
r' PACE LIMITS 34-44 32-42 P
est
---- ' _... ..-- - -80-9-2-5---- -----=- -- -- 79 e 22 -=-----== -
-IN-F ACE -
i PEED
MEAN S 38.23 37.92
!b' MEDIAN SPEED 38.50. 37.50 t
l
--STD. --DEV. -- __.. ..-..-- --- 4.-14------_____. -------- ------- ----=__ 4-.-1-9—=-=--------=-----
- C.
=31 MAX. SPEED 52 !
POSTED SPEED 4
1 kp F
—
-----%-EXCEEDING--POSTED-- - __- --- - - '3.70-- -- ---------------- —6.49 -_--- -- ---
r
r r
t ' ROAD OR STREET : DURHAM ROAD DATE : THURSDAYS AUGUST 199 1982
HWY NO. 141
I CITY OR COUNTY : TIGARD TIME: 1 : 05 PM TO 2. : 10 PM
' GENERAL LOCATION: AT FANNO CREEK WEATHER: FAIR - DRY
BRIDGE
--EAST-- AN&_-WEST- -
': CUMULATIVE
PERCENT
i,�------ 100- ---. ..._. . .__ ___ --- . - ------+--- ------ -- -_ ----------- ---- --
i' 96 +
92
----------- - =--- -- --- — --- — +- -------
88
;o+ 84 +
80
+
-76----- - - - - -- - -- --
, ' 72 +
b8 +
60
56 +
-- ----5 2 - -- ---- - - - - - -- -- -- + -
48 +
44
_ _...
36
32;21, +
- - - -+ - --- - _ -- - -- - -----------
24
-------_24 +
20 +
12 +
8 +
-
0 +
� 0. . . .+. . . . 10. . .+ . . . .20. . .;. . . . 30. . .+ . . . .40. . . +. . . .50. . .+. . . .60. . .+. x . .70
% EXCEEDING 100 100 100 96 70 29 3 0 0 0 0 0
----------SPEED --(MPH)-
;3!. -(MPH);3.,
EAST BOUND WEST MOUND
39 -
`I
VEHICLES - ---- -- - - -76---- ------ - --- ------ ---
41 .77
85% SPEED 42.30
_-- ---- €
" PACE LIMITS 33-43 32-42
i
-74-t-36--
•-' =IN -PACE----- - -- -
t MEAN SPEED 38.66 37.51
MEDIAN SPEED - - 38.50 37 ,50
.�., - ----'----- -- ------4.81----=
-STD. -DEV. -
�_ E
MAX. SPEED 49 53 E
'POSTED SPEED 45
POSTED -----
9/2/82
STREET DEDICATION
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That
Kenneth Paul Dahl and Sharon L. Dahl , husband and wife
hereinafter called grantor(s) , for the sum of $ constituting the
actual consideration for this deed, do hereby give, grant and dedicate to the Public
a perpetual right-of-way and easement for street, road and utility purposes on, over,
across, under, along and within the following described real premises in Washington
County, Oregon:
The following described tract being situated in the southwest 1/4 of the southeast
1/4 of Section 35 T-IS R-!W -W.M. City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon:
Beginning at a point located as follows: from a 5/8" iron rod marking the southwest
corner of Lot 9 of the duly recorded plat of "Tigardville Park" ; thence: along the
west line of Tigardville Park and the centerline of S.W. 91st Avenue N-00 20'37"-W
591 .62 feet; thence: S-89°39'14"-W 20.00 feet to the "True Point of Beginning" on the
west right of way of S. W. 91st Avenue; thence: S-89039' 19"-W 5.00 feet; thence:
N-0020'37"-W 143.99 feet parallel with the center line of S.W. 91st Avenue to a
point 35.00 feet at right angles to the centerline of S. W. Greenburg Road; thence:
N-56008'06"-W 97.74 feet parallel with the centerline of S. W. Greenburg Road;
thence: N-29 27' 14"-E 5.01 feet; thence: S-56°08'06"-E 100.77 feet along the exist-
ing 30.00 foot from centerline right of way line to the west right of way line of
S. W. 91st Avenue 20.00 feet from centerline at right angles thereto; thence:
S-0020'37"-E 146.64 feet to the Point of Beginning.
To have and to Hold the above described and dedicated rights unto the Public
for the uses and purposes hereinabove stated.
The grantor(s) hereby covenants that he (they) are the owner(s) iLi fee simple
and have a good and legal right to grant his (their) rights above described.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned person(s) has (have) hereunto set his (their)
hand(s) and seal(s) this day of M.I.
(Seal) (Seal)
E
(Seal) (Seal)
(Seal) (Seal)
III,I IN M IN 11-110
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington )
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this day of _ GQ �/ J�� , 19 Z—
before me the undersigned a Notary Public in and for the said County and State per—
sonally appeared the within named != _ v
who are known to me to be the identical individual(s) described in and who executed
the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same freely
and voluntarily.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this
day of 19C�
ary Public for Oregon G
M Commission Expires:14-
Reviewed as to form this -z day of
By:
City A r ey City of Tigard
Reviewed as to legal description this Z'� day ofy� ,
,f B ,
Approved this Q'�— day of ,
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PLANNING COMMISSION
By:
Chai man
APPROVED AND ACCEPTED this day of , 119Q_,- by
resolution of the Tigard City Council.
Witness my hand
City Recorder; Tigard, Oregon
30
\^. 91
• �a1 ,� � aya t� t.4 EriiiT S
�, lB GpK MSL Of/
�L i� r.sb •2, 35�'
t 46 "'Ar,a
b� Q
�P orb z�
$� .res'`
`ire-a \ �t\ •b�
/o's K sue.rsrf ♦ ° C
/-
elf-o7
` o zoz
`, - -- t,-0 - I
N-89_79
�` a/9•�s oarriv vGf/xxsw ramie.'
t_ T�L 25'00 E'r�7•
`eT/T/oti
%,do's i cow✓rr o,ec Gonl P.��G �SN�v�eo✓.� O v.YL I
T/< 2600 0.62 Act~•) //66.S�S•tJ. 6.eFE.vt3�.e6.eo f I
7Y6�e0 o c's 4 7z z 3
yyR/M/G
P2EP.9.eB..� !3 Y
t2-0� - Has[r�s;B�,aDdoli►ais.dasoacax�s
i c'•, .t�awodao�fo�st.pyymmr
3
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING STAFFS
SUBJECT: Plaid Pantry Hall and Durham OLCC License
The City Council has asked the Planning Staff to address the concerns
of NPO #6 area residents relative to the OLCC license for a Plaid
Pantry Store at Hall & Durham. The residents major concern stems
from the fact that the City Council forwarded the application for
an OLCC packaged goods license to OLCC in June of 1981. Over the
last several months , opposition to a convenience store which would
sell alcoholic beverages has been raised by the area residents . On
September 20 , 1982 the City Council had in their packets a memo from
the City Recorder outlining the steps necessary to rescind the
Council ' s original recommendation to OLCC. (see attached) On
September 27 , 1982 , the Council voted to forward a letter to OLCC
expressing concerns of package alcohol to OLCC expressing concerns
of package sales by Plaid Pantry at Durham and Hall. (see attached
minutes) . A letter was sent to OLCC signed by the Mayor expressing
concerns as outlined t the September 27 , 1982 meeting.
In mid October I contacted Paul Williamson of the OLCC license
Division to inquire about the status of the Hall & Durham location.
Mr. Williamson informed me that he had received the letter from
the Mayor outlining the Councils concerns. Unfortunately he told
me that OLCC was "committed" to approval of a license at the Hall
and Durham site until April of 1983 . Hoever, OLCC would reconsider
the approval if the City Council rescinded their original recommendation
for approval. I asked Mr. Williamson to send a letter to the Mayor
outlining the steps necessary for OLCC to reconsider the application.
Council was told by staff at the November 15, 1982 meeting that I
was waiting for a letter from OLCC. I spoke with Mike Marr on Tuesday
morning and he informed me that OLCC had sent the letter I requested
to the Mayor. I spoke to Mr. Williamson of OLCC on Wednesday morning.
He confirmed what Mr. Marr had told me and said he would send me a
copy of the letter. On Wednesday afternoon, the Mayor brought the
above mentioned letter into City Hall for Bob Jean to review.
The letter is from Alan Rogers, supervisor of the OLCC licensing
Division and contradicts Mr. Williamson' s previous statements to me
by stating there is no administrative procedure to rescind the license
for the Hall & Durham site.
On Thursday, November 18, 1982 , I made several attemps to contact Mr.
Williamson and Mr. Rogers by phone. I was not able to make contact with
either individual. It appears as though there is no recourse at this
time. However, I have written a letter for Council ' s approval and the
Mayor ' s signature which outlines the Council ' s concerns in this matter.
l!
CI 7NTyREGON
WASHINGTON CO
November 22 , 1982
Alan G. Rogers
Director, License Division
Oregon Liqour Control Commission
P.O. Box 2297 - 9079 S.E. McLoughlin Blvd.
Portland, Oregon 97222
RE: Application for a Package Store License Plaid
Pantry, Durham and Hall.
Dear Mr. Rogers,
Despite indications to the contrary, the City of Tigard
does not support the issuance of a package store license for
Plaid Pantry at 15485 S.W. Hall.
We understand that there is no Administrative Procedure
by which this license may be rescinded. However , should the
opportunity to deny this application come up, the City of
Tigard requests that OLCC deny the permit application.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Wilbur A. Bishop
Mayor - City of Tigard
dmj
12755 S W ASH P.O.BOX-23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171
a
OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISION cc: CITY OF TIGARD
Attn: Mr. Paul J. Williamson Attn: Mr. Robert Jean
Executive Assistant City Administator
License Division P.O. Box 23397
9079 S .E. Mcloughlin Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223
P.O. Box 22297
Portland, Oregon 97222
PETITIONARY OBJECTION
a
E
Subject: Application for Package Store Permit '
Applicant - Plaid Pantry Markets, Inc.
Location - Tigard, Oregon @ Hall Intersect with Durham Road
Statement: In accordance with Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 845,
Articles No. 845-05-030 and No. 845-05-035, the signators to
this petition herein advise and attest to: k
1.) We are residents on Durham Road, Hall Blvd, Picks Landing,
Cnpper Creek, Summerfield, and parents of students attending i
the schools in this area. i
2.) We are opposed to the issuance of a Package Store Permit to
said Applicant at the location described due to:
f
a.) incompatibility with surrounding established development,
that being residential with schools and churches in close
proximity.
b.) the type of traffic that would be attracted to the neigh-
borhood area, endangering the safety and well-being of F
many children who may be drawn into the immediate area by
the attractive nuisance of the facility itself.
c.) the fact that the community already has adequate facilities
in other established shopping locations (within two miles)
to serve the needs of the public, and that the granting of
a license as set out in the application is not demanded by
public interest or convenience.
The signators therefore request that said application be denied,
further, we request that our position be made a matter of permanent
record for any future applications of similar nature on this corner
of Hall and Durham Road.
Signature Sheets Attached
Ql-
sl
-0 W
vii4-)
:5c
Q)
LLJ E-=
ra 7D
c -:z
(2)
<c C)
S.- FcIlk
C) eo
CIL
ci
c41
ea
S-
L) C CD
S
4-•00 Cn
°'.4.2
C.a. tv u
CL
ICZ '5:
CL
i
� L �
e
m N
� N
'o
F— V O 3
v c sa N
N
W L A L
rn
C Q
ul \� ¢
Q aJ cl \ \
L G
O rt7 +� ••v
Q
I— L a! 2 ++
W +j L (21
ets Q1 -
I N U
U G O ✓�
Aj
fl-
i.- V
,2
r •r
N G. F—
G
+3 G G
to f6 O
U V •�
r r (o aJ
QQ J Z `
i-►
r1 d
i
OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL CIMMISION cc: CITY OF TIGARD
Attn: Mr. Paul J. Williamson Attn: Mr. Robert Jean
Executive Assistant City Administator
License Division P.O. Box 23397
9079 S.E. M.cloughlin Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 j
P.O. Box 22297
Portland, Oregon 97222
P E T I T I O N A R Y O B J E C T I O N
Subject: Application for Package Store Permit
Applicant - Plaid Pantry Markets, Inc.
Location - Tigard, Oregon @ Hall Intersect with Durham Road
Statement: In accordance with Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 845,
Articles No. 845-05-030 and No. 845-05-035, the signators to
this petition herein advise and attest to:
3
1.) We are residents on Durham Road, Hall Blvd, Picks Landing,
Capper Creek, Summerfield, and parents of students attending
the schools in this area.
2.) We are opposed to the issuance of a Package Store Permit to
said Applicant at the location described due to:
a.) incompatibility with surrounding established development,
that being residential with schools and churches in close
proximity.
. t
b.) the type of traffic that would be attracted to the neigh- i
borhood area, endangering the safety and well-being of
many children who may be drawn into the immediate area by
the attractive nuisance of the facility itself. E
c.) the fact that the community already has adequate facilities
in other established shopping locations (within two miles)
to serve the needs of the public, and that the granting of
a license as set out in the application is not demanded by E
public interest or convenience.
The signators therefore request that said application be denied,
further, we request that our position be made a matter of permanent
record for any future applications of similar nature on this corner
of Hall and Durham Road.
Signature Sheets Attached
C_
M
111,1
ISK
mN
LM
� � N
Ln
co
3 NZ
W Ecj
A L
ct—
rci
N ¢
L \
+�
CD � v
C •r U � }
rd
4! 4O SY.• cl C V
N �
d! O
C•r \ v `
r- •0r
rp ro O
r _ Q
%AtO
CL. ZJ
N
v?
_ 113,
GJ L
co �` c � 0
W E4-2
Ln
CD
a+ a
r
r- Ln a
cL c
S-
ai +j .a
ra
W +O-+ L Er p \
N ro
to cu
Y +� S-
v co
LA W V�
+3 C C v
RS r0
v v • \I` _
•r •r i�
CIL civ c
M.
Q
z
N
y
C
� ?
U � f
ll� �
Ca N
L( N
� C)
4r
'o v07i a
co N�
c 0 c
C / 3
LLJ
3 � +�-' 'fl V 1 m
n 4 1 3 G
C Q
.yam
L)
CJ V V l .--
Y- CJ
Ln up
L
ccc
L
Z 4-J ~ `
-§..j r
F— L CJ Z +)
O Y
W +J Z" (P.,
N e6
a.
d.10 •r \ '\
.1 O N
Y iJ S-
= C)
.co
a1. a"v
w to CO
r•r
� Cl- I.—
o •• n
to (o
v v•'•• sJ � ♦ i
Rt a
CL CL Q Q J ro
Z �
41
u G Srl% �•
CJ C" l /V
GARD
•OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISION cc: CITY OF
Attn: Mr.. Robert Jean
Attn: Mr. Paul 3. Williamson City Administator E
Executive Assistant P.O. Box 23397
License Division Tigard, Oregon 97223
9079 S .E. Mcloughlin Blvd.
P.O. Box 22297
Portland, Oregon 97222
P E T I T I O N A R Y O B J E C T I O N
Subject: Application for Package Store Permit
Applicant - Plaid Pantry Markets,
Location > Tigard, Oregon @ Hall Intersect with Durham Road
E
Statement: In accordance with Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 845,
d No. 845-05-035, the signators to
Articles No. 845-05-030 an
this petition herein advise and attest to:
1.) We are residents on Durham Road, Hall Blvd, Picks Landing,
Cnpper Creek, Summerfield, and parents of students attending
the schools in this area.
2.) We are opposed to the issuance of a Package Store Permit to
1
said Applicant at the location described due to:
a.) incompatibility with surrounding established development,
that being residential with schools and churches in close
proximity.
b.) the type of traffic that would be attracted to the neigh-
borhood area, endangering the safety and well-being of
many children who may be drawn into the anmediate area by
the attractive nuisance of the facility itself.
c.) the fact that the community already has adequate facilities
in other established shopping locations (within two miles)
to serve the needs of the public, and that the granting of
a license as set out in the application is not demanded by
public interest or convenience.
The signators therefore request that said application be denied,
further, we request that our position be made a matter of permanent
record for any future applications of similar nature on this corner
of Hall and Durham Road.
Signature Sheets Attached
-0 cu
CU
Ln ZS
tn
I
41
Ln
tn
6.3 -0
to Ln
4-) LK- 0
of
Z:l
>-
a —Ar
Vi
Q
v \ cc y
\ y
� v a
Z b 3 v
co y t7
c 01 (1)Q
U C 1a v:
�, of
W E A O L
FY-)
�V
+� N
CU V \�
r CL) a n�
Ln
of N b-
Q L
C •r U
N d w CJ i 1
GJ +j eO
F- s- d �' V
O Y w
LLJ
O N to
C Qi • c
to4-1 i s-
v CO d
d a
� � v
i •p i �
O•r RS
+o- Qp rn
r•r
y G. F-
+a C C
R3 b O .�
L) U
Q Q U F J
Q Q O RS C11
Q
GUl L d �
N
RECEIVED
Q G i 7 1982 CIT OF TIG PM
WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON
Oreaonb ,rCnnIroICnmmissj0,i
October 5, 1.982 = I
i
MR. C. DEAN SMITH
ADMINISTRATOR
OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION =
9079 S.E. McLOUGHLIN BLVD. - .-
PORTLAND, OREGON 97202
SUBJECT: PLAID PANTRY PACKAGE STORE LIQUOR LICENSES IN TIGARD
AT DURHAM/HALL AND BONITA/HALL
Dear Mr. Smith:
On June 1, 1981, the Tigard City Council recommended OLCC approval
of the liquor license at Durham Road and Hall Boulevard. On
i Septei.,ber 13, 1982, the Tigard City Council recommended OLCC
approval of the liquor license at Bonita Avenue and Hall Boulevard.
After receiving several letters from neighbors in the area and a
letter from the Superintendent of the Tigard School District, the
Tigard City Council reviewed these recommendations at the Regular
City Council meeting of September 27, 1982.
On a 4-1 vote, the City Council voted to express its concern to
the III over the issuance of two licenses in this area. Tigard
High School is on the South side of the Durham/Hall intersection
and within 3/4 of a mile of the Bonita/Hall intersection. The
Co-Lincil prefers only one license in the area, and favors the
Bonita/Hall location over the Durham/Hall site.
The City realizes that there may be little OLCC can do at the
present time. Any assistance, now or at an appropriate future
date, is much appreciated.
Yours truly,
CITY OF TIGARD
Wilbur A. Bishop,
Mayor
WAB . dkr i
CC : Tigard City Council
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas K. Wolf; Mr. & Mrs. A. Steiner
'
127MM Iiiii.ASFi� GG PF8 BOW derma k
Mr. 23397 TIGARD.OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171
Oregon Liquor Control Commission
vicroR ar�Yer+ P.O. BOX 22297, 9079 S.E. McLOUGHLIN BLVD., PORTLAND, OREGON 97222
OJYE'Nldl
October 19, 1982
Mr. Wilbur A. Bishop
Mayor of the City of Tigard
P.O . Box 23397
Tigard , Oregon 97223
Re : Application for a Package Store License
Plaid Pantries, Inc.
Plaid Pantry #19
15485 SW Hall Boulevard �FJ ,c ��i-QKc�
Tigard, Oregon
Dear Mr. Bishop :
This will acknowledge receipt of your letter dated October 5,
1982 concerning the above application for a Package Store li-
cense .
On June 16, 1982, a Package Store license was approved for the
above premises. This approval was subject to the completion of
the remodeling/construction of the premises . This application
was favorably endorsed by the City of Tigard and at that time
the Commission had not been made aware of any adverse public
opinion in regards to the application . Subsequently, at this
time there exists no normal administrative procedure by which
this license may be rescinded.
On October 14, 1982, the Package Store application for the
Plaid Pantry Store #116, to be located at 14600 SW Hall Boule-
vard, was considered by the OLCC Regulatory Staff. It was
their decision to recommend to the Commission that this appli-
cation be denied based on the existence of adverse public opin-
ion expressed by persons residing, working or owing a business
within a one-mile radius of the proposed premises. if this ap-
plicant does not request an administrative hearing on the pro-
posed license refu-al the Commissioners will decide upon the
( merits of the appl.- at -Lon at their December, 1982 meeting.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Hamm
Plaid Pantry #19
October 19, 1982
Page 2
I regret that there is little that can be done at this time re-
garding the City of Tigard ' s preference of the Bonita/Hall lo-
cation over the Durham/Hall location. However , if I can be of
any further assistance or if you desire any further information
please feel free to contact me .
Yours truly,
Alan G. Roger
Director
License Divi i
AGR :SS:lg/35508
IC
I
i
r
T I GAR D C I T Y C O U N C I L I :
f
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 20, 1982 - 7:30 P•M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop;
Councilors Tom Brian (arriving
at 7:38 P.M.), John Cook, Nancie Stimler (arriving at7:Director
P.M.), and Kenneth Scheckla (leaving at 11:00 P.M.);
of Public Works, Frank Currie; Finance Director/City
Recorder,
Doris Hartig; City Administrator, Bob Jean;
Planning & Development, Will of
Monahan; office Manager,
Loreen Wilson (leaving at 10:15 PM).
2. RECEIVE AND FILE DEPARTMENTAL MONTHLY REPORTS
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to receive and
file.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
3. PLAID PANTRY - DURHAM AND HALL LOCATION - REPORT
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to set matter
'', over to 9-27-82 meeting- s
-Approved-by unanimous vote of Council.
_ ...
}
/. 4. ACCEPT STREET DEDICATION - Geoffrey R. Spencer - SW Walnut Street
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to accept
dedication.
Approved by unanimous vote of Cout :il.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 82-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL CALLING FOR
OF ATTACHED TO
-- _ REVIEW ON ITS
5 82N AND INDITIONSON
PLANNED ODEVELOPMENT PD 2-82
SUBDIVISION
CAMBRIDGE SQUARE-
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve
Resolution No. 82-108.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
6. CALL SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING 9-28-82 AT 12:00 NOON AT CITY HALL
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to call special
meeting for 9-28-82 at Noon at City Hall.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
7•
CALL SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING 10-4-82 AT 7:30 P.M. AT FOWLER
oned by Coucilor Brian to call
(a) Motion by Councilor
u cilo a4-82 t 7:30 P.M. at Fo lern Junior High School. special
meetin
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
e
• 8. HEARING OFFICER ANNOUNCEMENT - 74TH AND DURHAM SENSITIVE LANDS HEARING ON
9-23-82
(a) After lengthy discussion regarding hearing on sensitive lands issue,
Councilor Cook moved to receive and file the report.
Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council.
9. WATER COMMITTEE REPORT
(a) Councilor Stimler reported that the next meeting of the Committee
would be Thursday, September 23rd. To this date they have been
gathering information. Bruce Clark, the Chairman of the Committee,
will issue any statements made by the Committee. She stated there
would be further reports later as the Committee completes more of the
study.
10. URBAN SERVICES TASK FORCE REPORT
(a) City Administrator explained the scope of work and stated that this
would be done on a County-wide basis to document the costs of
providing urban services in the County as well as analyze the extent
of possible double taxation. He explained the financial side to this
issue and recommended the Council pledge $5,000 as the City's share
to facilitate this study.
(b) Councilor Brian expressed concern that this item should not be done
before the November 2, 1982 election. City Administrator responded
that the relationships and basic patterns in the County would be
helpful to take to the legislature if Ballot Measure #3 passes.
t �
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 82-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF FUNDS.
(d) rl3tion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve. f
Approved by 3-2 majority vote of Council. Councilors Brian and
Scheckla voting nay.
(e) Mayor Bishop requested staff report back as to how the other cities
in the County vote on this issue.
11. MASTER STREET PLAN
(a) Director of Public Works stated the transportation plan will be in
the Comprehensive Plan and should be out in about 2 weeks. He
highlighted the various components of the plan.
(b) Lengthy discussion ensued regarding various individual streets
proposed on the plan. Mayor Bishop requested that the Ash Avenue
extension from Burnham Street to Commercial Street be eliminated from
the plan. Director of Public Works stressed that streets shown are
�- "general locations" only.
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 20, 1982
i
i
I.
e
(c) Councilor Stimler requested that each NPO see the plan as proposed
and asked that each NPO Chairmen be present for the final hearing and
{ adoption of the plan before the Council.
(d) Bob Bledsoe, NPO #3 Member, stated that the NPO has voted to have
121st and Gaarde Streets as minor collectors.
(e) Gordon Martin, NPO #4 Chairman, stated that NPO #4 wants the existing
road plan to remain in their area as previously adopted.
(f) City Administrator reported that this item would be brought back
before Council for hearing and adoption after the NPO's and Planning
Commission have seen it.
RECESS: 9:00 P.M.
RECONVENE: 9:11 P.M.
12. MASTER STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
(a) Director of Public Works discussed issues surrounding the future
adoption of the master storm drainage plan. Various waterways (i.e.
Fanno Creek, Ash and Summer Creeks and the Tualatin River) were
discussed in more detail.
(b) City Administrator reported that the plan will address the following
concerns: (1) function of the floodway; (2) preservation of the
floodway; (3) economic development; and (4) capital improvement
{ projects for storm drainage. He stated this would be presented again
to Council for hearing and adoption.
13. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair
under item 1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged-
to
ncouragedto contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting.
13.1 ATTORNEY REPORT
(a) Legal Counsel reported that letters have been sent to developers who
have outstanding development bonds. They have been given 60 days to
complete the work outstanding, or they should contact the City to
work out a reasonable time frame. Legal Counsel will be reporting to
Council on each subdivision as it comes in.
13.2 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES CONVENTION - 11/7-9/82
(a) City Administrator reported that the League Convention is scheduled
for November 7-9, 1982 in Eugene. He asked those Councilors
interested in attending to contact the Administrative Secretary for
registration.
Councilor Brian requested staff supply a draft agenda for the
convention.
PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 20, 1982
Egoism
13.3 NW UNDERGROUND LAWSUIT REPORT
(` (a) Legal Counsel reported new developments in the NW Underground lawsuit
and requested motion by Council to authorize attorney to proceed
against the bond of $12,000 at this time. If the City wins the case,
the City would also receive payment for attorney fees.
(b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to authorize
City Attorney to proceed against the surety bond.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
13.4 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISCUSSION
(a) Legal Counsel reported on various issues which over the last year
have required much time and expense on his part (i.e. Emmert/O'Brian,
Settlemire, 72nd Avenue Writ of Review, Recall Election, Senior
Center Litigation, Water District Issues, Labor Relations, and 10
LIDs.)
(b) City Administrator discussed with Council ways which the City might
lower its legal services expenses over the next year.
(c) Mayor Bishop requested City Administrator and Legal Counsel continue
working on the issue and keep Council advised by reporting monthly.
Consensus of Council was to support Mayor Bishop's request.
{ RECESS: 10:15 P.M.
14. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session
under ORS 192.660 (1)(d) and (1)(f) to consider labor negotiations and
pending litigation.
COUNCILOR SCHECKLA LEFT: 11:00 P.M.
RECONVENE: 11:05 P.M.
15. 72ND AVENUE BANCROFT APPLICATIONS
(a) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Cook to accept the
late amended bancroft applications for Southern Pacific in the 72nd
Avenue LID.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
16. ADJOURNMENT: 11:07 P.M.
City Recorder - City of Tig d
ATTEST:
Mayor - City of Tigard
PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 20, 1982
AREA
10. ACCEPT LATE BANCROFT APPLICATIONS
(a) Staff requested item be placed near end of the agenda.
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to hear
later on the agenda.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
11. CALL SPECIAL MEETING - 09-28-82 - 11:30 A.M. - TIGARD CITY HALL
(a) Staff requested time of special meeting be changed from Noon to 11:30
A.M. to achieve quorum in attendance at meeting.
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to call
special meeting as recommended by staff.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
12. PLAID PANTRY OLCC LIQUOR RECONSIDERATION - DURHAM & HALL BLVD.
(a) City Administrator stated that Council had requested this issue be
R;
reconsidered tonight and briefed Council on history of issue.
(b) Chief of Police recommended Council not renew, or recommend renewal =
of license for the Durham and Hall location because it is too close
to the school.
(c) Mike Marr, citizen, appeared to request that consideration at this c `
meeting be held strictly to the Durham and Hall location and not
Bonita and Hall.
(d) Mr. Steve Janik, Attorney for Plaid Pantry, stated there seemed to be
a procedural confusion on the part of the City. He objected to this
hearing and reconsideration without proper notice being sent to Plaid
Pantry. He advised Council that if the proper process were followed,
Plaid Pantry would be happy to come before the Council and present
facts regarding the Durham and Hall location.
(e) City Attorney stated that this is not a public hearing and Council
could advise if there are problems, in their eyes, in the location or x
if they wished to rescind their previous motion.
(f) Jane Miller, NPO #6, stated that at their September 16, 1982 meeting
the NPO voted unanimously to recommend denial of the license.
(g) Deb Fennell, Superintendent of School District #23-J, stated the
School Board has not had time to act on this issue, but he has a
problem with the site and its close proximity to the High School and
requested Council not approve the license for Durham and Hall.
(h) After further discussion, Councilor Scheckla moved to send no
recommendation to OLCC regarding this matter.
Motion failed for lack of second.
PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 27, 1982
r
(i) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to forward
advice 'Letter to OLCC expressing concerns of package sales by the
Plaid Pantry in the Bonita/Hall and Durham/Hall locations because of
their close proximity to each other and Durham/Hall's close proximity
to the High School. Letter to further advise that Council prefers
only one application be approved by OLCC and would prefer the
Bonita/Hall location to that of Durham/Hall.
Motion approved by 4-1 majority vote of Council. Councilor Scheckla
voting nay.
CHIEF OF POLICE LEFT: 8:30 P.M.
13. TEMPORARY USE PERMIT TU 12-82 SOUTHERN PACIFIC NPO #5 PUBLIC HEARING
A request by Southern Pacific to place a 24' x 60' trailer for one year as
temporary office use until finalization of Auto Center expansion. Located
at 15200 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 12D lot 200) Kable Acre Tracts lot I.
(a) Public hearing Opened
(b) Director of Planning and Development gave history of issue as set out
in staff report and Planning Commission minutes.
(c) Public Testimony:
Mrs. Jeri Ball, representing DJB Inc. , questioned the Director on
which tax lots were involved. There was a discrepancy between the
newspaper and public notices which were mailed.
Legal Counsel and staff stated that the tax lot numbers were mixed up
at the County level however the notice was legally sufficient since +
both tax lot numbers appear on the Washington County maps.
(d) Director of Planning and Development recommended approval of
ordinance with expiration date for the use on 9-27-83.
(e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) ORDINANCE NO. 82-67 AN ORDINANCE ALOWING A TEMPORARY USE
PERMIT FOR SOUTHERN PACIFIC, AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
(g) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
14. CAMBRIDGE SQUARE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 2-82 SUBDIVISION S 5-82 NPO #2
PUBLIC HEARING
A review by the Tigard City Council upon its own motion limited to review
of conditions attached to the Cambridge Square Phase I General Plan
approval by the Planning Commission. Property is located at 11820 and
11900 SW 98th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35CD Tax Lots 2200 & 2300).
(a) Public Hearing Opened
PAGE 4 -COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 27, 1982
.,t,i i 1982 CITY OF TIGARD
WASHINGTON COUNTY. OREGON
Ortmonb rCnnIroICn nmissjor
October 5 , 1982 I
t
MR. C. DEAN SMITH
ADMINIST=ATOR
OKt;u0z4 LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION _
9079 S . E. MCLOUGHLIN BLVD.
PORTLAND, OREGON 97202
SUBJECT: PLAID PANTRY PACKAGE STORE LIQUOR LICENSES IN TIGARD
AT DURHAM/HALL AND BONImA/HALL
Dear Mr. Smith:
On Jure 1 , 1981, the Tigard City Council recommended OLCC approval
of the liquor license at Durham Road and Hall Boulevard. On
Septei..:Der 13 , 1982 , the Tigard City Council recommended OLCC
approval of the liquor license at Bonita Avenue and Hall Boulevard.
After receiving several letters from neighbors in the area and a
letter from the Superintendent of the Tigard School District, the
Tigard City Council reviewed these recommendations at the Regular
Cit} Council meeting of September 27 , 1982 .
On a 4-1 vote, the City Council voted to express its concern to
the OLCC over the issuance of two licenses in this area. Tigard
High School is on the South side of the Durham/Hall intersection
and within 3/4 of a mile of the Bonita/Hall intersection_ The
Council prefers only one license in the area, and favors the
Bonita/Hall location over the Durham/Hall site.
The City realizes that there may be little OLCC can do at the
present time. Any assistance, now or at an appropriate future
date, is much appreciated.
Yours truly,
CITY OF TIGARD
6Z�Wilbur A. Bishop,
Mayor
WAB : dkr
CC : Tigard City Council
Mr. & Mrs.
.� Thomas
K. Wolf; Mr. & Mrs. A. Steiner
Mr. 2755r 5vv ASA W. BeOX 23397 TIGARD. OREGON 97223 PH:x-4171
Oregon Liquor Control Commission
vlCTpq ATIYEM P.O. BOX 22297, 9079 S.E. McLOUGHLIN BLVD., PORTLAND, OREGON 97222
uwcwow `
October 19, 1982
Mr. Wilbur A. Bishop
Mayor of the City of Tigard
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Re: Application for a Packaoe Store License
Plaid Pantries, Inc.
Plaid Pantry #19
15485 SM Hall Boulevard
Tigard, Oregon
fl
Dear Mr. Bishop:
This will acknowledge receipt of your letter dated October 5,
1982 concerning the above application for a Package Store li-
cense.
On June 16, 1982, a Package Store license was approved for the
above premises. This approval was subject to the completion of
the remodeling/construction of the premises. This application
. was favorably endorsed by the City of Tigard and at that time
the Commission had not been made aware of any adverse public
0131n3on in -reglards to the aplication. Subsequent equea' i j, at -,-'is
time there exists no normal administrative procedure by which
this license may be rescinded.
On October 14, 19829 the Package Store application for the
Plaid Pantry Store #1169 to be located at 14600 SW Hall Boule-
vard, was considered by the OLCC Regulatory Staff. It was.
their decision to recommend to the Commission that this appli-
cation be denied based on the existence of adverse public opin-
ion expressed by persons residing, working or owing a business
within a one-mile radius of the proposed premises. If this ap-
plicant does not request an administrative hearing on the pro-
posed license refusal, the Commissioners will decide upon the
merits of the application at their December, 1982 meeting.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
MLM
PI a 1(j Pantry ill
October 19, 1982
Page 2
I regret that there is little that can be done at this time re—
garding the City of Tigard ' s preference of the Bonita/Hall lo—
cation over the Durham/Hall location. However , if I can be of
any further assistance or if you desire any further information
please feel free to contact me.
Yours truly,
Alan G. Rogers
Director
License Division
AGR:SS:lg/55508
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON (((
RESOLU'T'ION NO. 82-_1_32,:2-
A
2-_�32,:2-
A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A FINAL ORDER
REGARDING THE APPLICATIONS FILED BY J. B. BISHOP FOR REVISION TO
THE NPO #1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CONCOMITANT ZONE CHANGE (CPR 4-82
and ZC 18-82) .
WHEREAS, J. B. Bishop has applied to the City of Tigard for a
Comprehensive Plan revision from Commercial Professional/General
Commercial to General Commercial on the property described on Tax
Map 2S1 2CC, Lots 200 and 500 , and a similar Plan change from
Commercial Professional to General Commercial for those lots
described on Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lots 100 , 801 and 900 ; and
WHEREAS, J. B. Bishop has also applied for a zone change from CP
(Commercial Professional) and C-3 (General Commercial) to C-3
(General Commercial) for lands described on Tax Map 2S1 2CC, -Tax
Lots 200 and 500 and a similar zone change from CP to C-3 for lots x
described on Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lots 100, 801 and 900 ; and
WHEREAS , the requests for Comprehensive Plan revision and zone change
were consolidated pursuant to the provisions of TMC § 18 . 84 . 060 , for
hearing before the Tigard Planning Commission and the Tigard City
Council under TMC S 18 . 84 .050 (b) (2) ; and
F
WHEREAS , on the basis of the staff report prepared by the Director 3
of Planning and Development, the Tigard Planning Commission did, on
October 19 , 1982 , approve the aforesaid applications , which are now s
on review to the City Council ; and
s
WHEREAS,, notice of these proceedings was given pursuant to TMC
18 . 84. 070 and a public hearing was held on the aforesaid applications;
and
t
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the view, upon consideration of
testimony and other materials submitted to it, that the aforesaid
application should be approved;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Tigard City Council resolves as follows:
Section 1: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the applications submitted by
J. B. Bishop, numbered CPR 4-82 and ZC 18-82 be, and the s
same hereby are APPROVED on the basis of the findings and conclusions
set forth in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto and by this reference made
a part hereof, and subject to the conditions set forth in the afore-
said Exhibit "A" ; and
t
S
Section 2: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Resolution be
sent to all parties of record and shall constitute the
notice of final decision in this matter.
RESOLUTION No. 82-
Page 1
PASSED: This day of 1982 , by the Council
of the City of Tigard.
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
Recorder - City of Tigard
RESOLUTION No. 82-
Page 2
EXHIBIT "A"
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
CPR 4-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION
AND
ZC 18-82 ZONE CHANGE
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 1982
i
Applicant: J.B. Bishop
i
FINDINGS
t
i
1. The site is generally located on the east side of Pacific Highway,
approximately 1,000 feet south of S.W. Garrett, (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2CC,
Tax Lots 100, 200, 500 ,801 and 900) and consists of approximately 12.06 acres.
2. The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Revision from
Commercial Professional/General Commercial to General Commercial on Tax Map
2S1 2CC, Tax Lots 200 and 500 and from Commercial Professional to General
Commercial on Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lots 100, 801 and 900. The applicant is
also requesting a zone change from CP/C3 to C3 on Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lots
200 and 500 and from CP to C3 on Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lots 100, 801 and 900.
3. There is an existing building on Tax Lot 900 with two tenants, the
Tigard Paint Store and Feeks and Stongs Potato Pub. Feeks and Stongs Potato
Pub received a conditional use permit ( CU7-82) to operate a restaurant
(commercial use) in a CP zone. 4
4. Approximately 1.5 acres (Tax Lot 900) of the total 12.06 acres is
developed. At the present time, there is one retail building on the southwest
end of the site which is occupied by the Tigard Paint Center and Feeks and
Stongs Potato Pub. Adjacent to that is the Heinz Auto Europe Auto Repair
Shop. The remaining 10.5 acres is undeveloped (leaves unaccounted for .06
acres).
The property slopes toward the southeast and has several large trees along
the southern and western boundaries. The remainder of the site is densely
covered with brush and grass.
5. The property to the northeast of the subject property is developed
with commercial uses. The land to the west and south is zoned and developed
as single family residential. The property across Pacific Highway is
designated and partially developed for commercial uses.
- 1 -
6. The following LCDC statewide planning goals are applicable to this
application:
a. Citizen Involvement: Goal ill - The intent of this goal is to insure
the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning
process. Notices were mailed to all owners of record within 250 feet of the
site. A public notice was published in the Tigard Times on October 7, 1982.
NPO #1 reviewed the request on October 6, 1982, and approved it unanimously.
The Planning Commission also unanimously approved the application.
b. Land Use: Goal #2 - All applicable LCDC Goals and Guidelines, NPO #1
policies and Tigard Municipal Code sections were considered in review of this
t
application.
C. Natural Hazards: Goal #7 - The goal requires that development should
not be located on lands with natural hazards, without appropriate safeguards.
The eastern portion of the subject property has some steep slopes and `
development of the property will require the filling of an existing
drainage-way. The applicant also seeks to reroute some sanitary sewer and
storm sewer lines on the property. The applicant has applied for and, on
November 10, 1982, was issued a Sensitive Lands Permit after a hearing before
the City Hearings Officer. The City Engineer, planning staff and Hearings
after review of technical data submitted by the
Officer have determined,
applicant, that the proposal will not adversely affect runoff, erosion, ground
stability, water quality, ground water levels, flow rates or flooding. A
Senitive Lands Permit was therefore issued for development of the property in
application M3-82, with appropriate conditions.
d. Economy: Goal #9 - The purpose of this goal is to diversify and
improve the economy of the state. Presently, the property is not being
utilized to its full potential. The property is in a prime retail commercial
tends to construct a shopping center on the site.
location. The applicant in
The center will provide approximately 230 jobs for the community. In
addition, the shopping center will pro,. 'de a needed service to residents in
the area.
e. Public facilities and Services: Goal #11 - The purpose of this goal
is to insure the provision of public facilities to the site. Presently, there
is an 8" sewer line which runs through the site. The applicant has submitted
a Sensitive Lands Permit application to relocate the sewer line on site, and
such permit has been granted. In addition, the applicant is proposing to
relocate the storm drain line. Water is available from a line in SW Pacific
Highway in adequate quantities and with adequate pressure to serve both fire
and domestic needs.
2 -
f. Transportation: Goal #12 - The intent of this goal is to provide a
safe, convenient and economic transportation system. The site is accessible
from Pacific Highway, which is a Tri-Met bus line. The applicant has proposed
three access points onto Pacific Highway. The Oregon Department of
Transportation has reviewed the applicant's plan and granted conditional
approval.
7. The following NPO #1 (Comprehensive Plan ) policies are applicable to
this application:
a. Policy 18: Pacific Highway is developing as a strip commercial
highway. The traffic carrying capacity of this highway should have the
highest priority and adjacent commercial development should be subordinated to
this need. The proposed development would add only one access point to
Pacific Highway and would cause little interference with the traffic-carrying
capacity of such highway.
b. Policy 19: In the interest of safety and efficiency, the number of
highway access points must be kept to a minimum. Wherever possible,
businesses on Pacific Highway should be clustered and share common parking
new development occurs, the number of access
facilities and driveways. As
points should not exceed the number necessary for proper on-site traffic
circulation and where possible should be combined with access to adjacent
businesses. Development of the subject property as a single, integrated
commercial development would permit more restrictive access to Pacific Highway
than would. occur from segmented development of the subject property in its
existing Commercial' Professional classification.
C. Policy 20: Highway-oriented commercial businesses should have
priority use of Pacific Highway frontage because they are dependent upon the
volume of through traffic for their business. The existing designation of the
portion of property fronting on Pacific Highway is Commercial Professional
rather than Commercial and does not meet such policy.
d. Policy 21: Businesses on Pacific Highway should be oriented to the
existing traffic and not draw additional traffic from the adjacent community.
Convenience or neighborhood centers should, therefore, be prohibited from
locating on Pacific Highway. The proposed development is not a convenience or
neighborhood center and would not permit any direct access from the adjacent
residential neighborhoods.
8. The proposed shopping center will have three access points onto
Pacific Highway, two of which are existing. In addition, the shopping center
will be convenient for area residents, allowing them to stay in the
neighborhood rather than drive Pacific Highway to shop.
- 3 -
Access to the site has been given careful consideration and the State of
Oregon Highway Division has granted approval of the design.
9. The City has received a petition signed by several residential
neighbors of the proposed project who have expressed concerns about the need
for buffering the project from residences located in the R-7 zone to the east
of the subject property. Such concerns have in general been recognized by the
City and by the applicant to be legitimate. The project will be subject to
Site Design Review, which will afford a detailed analysis of the physical
relationship between the proposed project and the adjoining residential
neighborhood.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The proposed zone change and comprehensive plan revision meet all
applicable LCDC Goals, NPO #1 Policies, and are consistent with the text of
the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed use would be compatible with the existing commercial uses
in the area.
3. Redesignation of the property to General Commercial (C-3) in the
comprehensive plan and zoning maps will allow the property to be used in a
coordinated manner for development of an integrated shopping center project
which will be compatible with the needs of the community.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The following conditions are hereby attached to the approval of such
project :
1. Thb design and configuration of improvements to S.W. Pacific Highway
and the access points from the site to S.W. Pacific Highway shall be approved
by Oregon Department of Transportation prior to issuance of building permits.
The Oregon Department of Transportation approval shall be in writing and shall
be accompanied by a plan.
2. A maintenance agreement and plan for the frontage road and island
shall be submitted with the application for Site Design Review.
3. The applicant shall apply for Site Design Review. The Site Design
Review application shall include elevation sketches showing proposed screening
from abutting residential neighborhoods and a letter outlining the disposition
of the existing right-of-way which the state intends to dedicate to the
property owner.
4. The applicant shall, in the Site Design Review process, address the
need for buffering of the proposed development from residential properties to
the east of the subject property, including the possible need for fencing in
such buffer area.
4 -
Such buffering, as is /determined i the Site 'Design Review process to b�
-Cv--�-�c.6L.
appropriate,�shµ be substJantially constructed prior to the issuance of
building permits.
5. The applicant shall not cut or remove any trees within the most
easterly 20 feet of the subject property, adjoining the residential
neighborhood to the east of the subject property, prior to Site Design Review
approval.
6. The City staff shall provide written notice of the time and place for
consideration of the site design of the subject property to an authorized
representative of NPO #1 and to all parties of record in this proceeding, who
appeared either in person or in writing before either Planning Commission or
City Council in connection with the subject application.
—5—
PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
r
CPR 4-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION
AND
ZC 18-82 ZONE CHANGE
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 1982
Applicant: J.B. Bishop
FINDINGS
1. The site is generally located on the east side of Pacific Highway,
approximately 1,000 feet south of S.W. Garrett, (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2CC,
Tax Lots 100, 200, 500 ,801 and 900) and consists of approximately 12.06 acres.
2. The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Revision from
Commercial Professional/General Commercial to General Commercial on Tax Map
2S1 2CC, Tax Lots 200 and 500 and from Commercial Professional to General
Commercial on Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lots 100, 801 and 900. The applicant is
also requesting a zone change from CP/C3 to C3 on Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lots
200 and 500 and from CP to C3 on Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lots 100, 801 and 900.
. 3. There is an existing building on Tax Lot 900 with two tenants, the
Tigard Paint Store and Feeks and Stongs Potato Pub. Feeks and Stongs Potato
Pub received a conditional use permit ( CU7-82) to operate a restaurant
(commercial use) in a CP zone.
4. Approximately 1.5 acres (Tax Lot 900) of the total 12.06 acres is
developed. At the present time, there is one retail building on the southwest
end of the site which is occupied by the Tigard Paint Center and Feeks and
Stongs Potato Pub. Adjacent to that is the Heinz Auto Europe Auto Repair
Shop. The remaining 10.5 acres is undeveloped (leaves unaccounted for .06
acres).
The property slopes toward the southeast and has several large trees along
the southern and western boundaries. The remainder of the site is densely
covered with brush and grass.
5. The property to the northeast of the subject property is developed
with commercial uses. The land to the west and south is zoned and developed
as single family residential. The property across Pacific Highway is
designated and partially developed for commercial uses.
- 1 -
6. The following LCDC statewide planning goals are applicable to this
application:
a. Citizen Involvement: Goal #1 - The intent of this goal is to insure
the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning
process. Notices were mailed to all owners of record within 250 feet of the
site. A public notice was published in the Tigard Times on October 7, 1982.
NPO #1 reviewed the request on October 6, 1982, and approved it unanimously.
The Planning Commission also unanimously approved the application.
b. Land Use: Goal #2 - All applicable LCDC Goals and Guidelines, NPO #1
policies and Tigard MUnicipal Code sections were considered in review of this
application.
C. Natural Hazards: Goal #7 - The goal requires that development should
not be located on lands with natural hazards, without appropriate safeguards.
The eastern portion of the subject property has some steep slopes and
development of the property will require the filling of an existing
drainage-way. The applicant also seeks to reroute some sanitary sewer and
storm sewer lines on the property. The applicant has applied for and, on
November 10, 1982, was issued a Sensitive Lands Permit after a hearing before
the City Hearings Officer. The City Engineer, planning staff and Hearings
Officer have determined, after review of technical data submitted by the
applicant, that the proposal will not adversely affect runoff, erosion, ground
stability, water quality, ground water levels, flow rates or flooding. A
Senitive Lands Permit was therefore issued for development of the property in
application M3-82, with appropriate conditions.
d. Economy: Goal #9 - The purpose of this goal is to diversify and
improve the economy of the state. Presently, the property is not being
utilized to its full potential. The property is in a prime retail commercial
location. The applicant intends to construct a shopping center on the site.
The center will provide approximately 230 jobs for the community. In
addition, the shopping center will provide a needed service to residents in
the area•
e. Public Facilities and Services: Goal #11 - The purpose of this goal
is to insure the provision of public facilities to the site. Presently, there
is an 8" sewer line which runs through the site. The applicant has submitted
a Sensitive Lands Permit application to relocate the sewer line on site, and
such permit has been granted. In addition, the applicant is proposing to
relocate the storm drain line. Water is available from a line in SW Pacif is
Highway in adequate quantities and with adequate pressure to serve both fire
and domestic needs.
2 -
f. Transportation: Goal #12 - The intent of this goal is to provide a
safe, convenient and economic transportation system. The site is accessible
from Pacific Highway, which is a Tri-Met bus line. The applicant has proposed
three access points onto Pacific Highway. The Oregon Department of
Transportation has reviewed the applicant's plan and granted conditional
approval.
7. The following NPO #1 (Comprehensive Plan ) policies are applicable to
this application:
a. Policy 18: Pacific Highway is developing as a strip commercial
highway. The traffic carrying capacity of this highway should have the
highest priority and adjacent commercial development should be subordinated to
this need. The proposed development would add only one access point to
Pacific Highway and would cause little interference with the traffic-carrying
capacity of such highway.
b. Policy 19: In the interest of safety and efficiency, the number of
highway access points must be kept to a minimum. Wherever possible,
businesses on Pacific Highway should be clustered and share common parking
facilities and driveways. As new development occurs, the number of access
points should not exceed the number necessary for proper on-site traffic
circulation and where possible should be combined with access to adjacent
businesses. Development of the subject property as a single, integrated
commercial development would permit more restrictive access to Pacific Highway
than would occur from segmented development of the subject property in its
existing Commercial Professional classification.
C. Policy 20: Highway-oriented commercial businesses should have
priority use of Pacific Highway frontage because they are dependent upon the
volume of through traffic for their business. The existing designation of the
portion of property fronting on Pacific Highway is Commercial Professional
rather than Commercial and does not meet such policy.
d. Policy 21: Businesses on Pacific Highway should be oriented to the
existing traffic and not draw additional traffic from the adjacent community.
Convenience or neighborhood centers should, therefore, be prohibited from
locating on Pacific Highway. The proposed development is not a convenience or
neighborhood center and would not permit any direct access from the adjacent
residential neighborhoods.
8. The proposed shopping center will have three access points onto
Pacific Highway, two of which are existing. In addition, the shopping center
will be convenient for area residents, allowing them to stay in the
neighborhood rather than drive Pacific Highway to shop.
- 3 -
M 11
Access to the site has been given careful consideration and the State of
Oregon Highway Division has granted approval of the design.
9. The City has received a petition signed by several residential
neighbors of the proposed project who have expressed concerns about the need
for buffering the project from residences located in the R-7 zone to the east
of the subject property. Such concerns have in general been recognized by the
City and by the applicant to be legitimate. The project will be subject to
Site Design Review, which will afford a detailed analysis of the physical
relationship between the proposed project and the adjoining residential
neighborhood.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The proposed zone change and comprehensive plan revision meet all
applicable LCDC Goals, NPO #1 Policies, and are consistent with the text of
the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed use would be compatible with the existing commercial uses
in the area.
3. Redesignation of the property to General Commercial (C-3) in the
comprehensive plan and zoning maps will allow the property to be used in a
E coordinated manner for development of an integrated shopping center project
which will be compatible with the needs of the community.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The following conditions are hereby attached to the approval of such
project:
1. The design and configuration of improvements to S.W. Pacific Highway
and the access points from the site to S.W. Pacific Highway shall be approved
by Oregon Department of Transportation prior to issuance of building permits.
The Oregon Department of Transportation approval shall be in writing and shall
be accompanied by a plan.
2. A maintenance agreement and plan for the frontage road and island
shall be submitted with the application for Site Design Review.
3. The applicant shall apply for Site Design Review. The Site Design
Review application shall include elevation sketches showing proposed screening
from abutting residential neighborhoods and a letter outlining the disposition
of the existing right-of-way which the state intends to dedicate to the
property owner.
4. The applicant shall, in the Site Design Review process, address the
need for buffering of the proposed development from residential properties to
the east of she subject property, including the possible need for fencing in
such buffer area.
4 -
Such buffering, as is determined in the Site Design Review process to be
appropriate, shall be substantially constructed prior to the issuance of
building permits.
S. The applicant shall not cut or remove any trees *within the most
easterly 20 feet of the subject property, adjoining the residential
neighborhood to the east of the subject property, prior to Site Design Review
approval.
6. The City staff shall provide written notice of the time and place for
consideration of the site design of the subject property to an authorized
representative of NPO #1 and to all parties of record in this proceeding, who
appeared either in person or in writing before either Planning Commission. or
City Council in connection with the subject application.
The Council FURTHER ORDERS that the Planning Director and the City
Recorder send a copy of the Final Order as a Notice of Final Decision to the
parties to the parties in this case.
- S -
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 82- O
A RESOLUTION CONCERNING VACATION uF PORTIONS OF S.W. 72ND AVENUE,
A DEDICATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON
COUNTY, OREGON
WHEREAS, the area described on the attached sheet headed
"Exhibit All and by this reference made a part hereof, is an
undeveloped unused portion of street dedicated to the public for
highway purposes; and
WHEREAS, the area described on said Exhibit "A" lies within
the corporate boundaries of the City of Tigard, Oregon; and
WHEREAS, said described area does not serve a public highway
purpose and is so situated as to be of no usefulness now or in the
future as part of the public street system of the City; and
WHEREAS, the party which will accrue property by virtue of
the vacation is dedicating, at less than appraised cost, to the
City of Tigard another right-of-way parcel necessary in the
completion of L.I.D. 21 - S.W. 72nd Avenue Street Improvement; and
WHEREAS, it appears to be in the public interest that the said
area be vacated and restored to the tax rolls and made available for r
development and use; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to ORS 271. 130 the City Council may initiate
vacation proceedings as authorized by ORS C::apter 271;
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Tigard as follows:
1. That the public hearing is hereby called to be held by
the City Council of Tigard on Monday, Sept. 13, 1982, at Fowler
Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, within
the City of Tigard, beginning at 7: 30 p.m. , at which time and place
the Council shall hear any objections to the proposed vacation so
that any interested person may appear and be heard for or against
the proposed vacating of said lands.
2. That the City Recorder be, and she is hereby, authorized
and directed to cause to have published in the Tigard Times, a
newspaper of general circulation in the City of Tigard hereby
designated for such purpose, a notice of said hearing in the form
hereto attached as Exhibit "B" and by this reference made a part
hereof, the first publication to be made on the 12th day of August,
1982, and once each week thereafter for four publishings in all.
George H. Killian
RESOLUTION No. 82-_& _
Page 1
{ The Recorder be, and she is hereby, further directed to cause to
have posted within five (5) days after the date of first publication,
a copy of said notice in the form hereto attached as Exhibit. "B"
in at least two (2) conspicuous places within the area proposed to
be vacated, all of said postings to be accomplished within the time
herein stated.
3. That the particular portion of dedicated street proposed
to be vacated is described on the attached sheet headed Exhibit "A"
and by this reference made a part hereof.
4. That the vacation ordinance shall not be effective until
such time as the other right-of-way under the control of George H.
Killian, and necessary for the improvement of the 72nd Avenue
project, is acquired by the City of Tigard.
PASSED: By Council on the 26th day of July, 1982.
e
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
i
Recorder - Ca.t ofigard
t
C
RESOLUTION NO.
Page 2
EXHIBIT "A"
Two parcels of land more particularly described as follows:
Parcel I: Being a portion of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road also
being that portion of the tract (described in Fee No. 78-28456 as
Exhibit B-2) dedicated to the public (City of Tigard) , in the
northwest 4 of the northeast 4 of Section 13, T.2S. , R. 1W.;, W.M. ,
City of Tigard, Washington County Oregon more particularly
described as being that portion of said Exhibit B-2, Fee No.
78-28456 that lies northwesterly of a line that is northwesterly
30 feet at right angles and parallel to the following described
centerline:
Beginning at a point of curve in the existing centerline
of County Road A-138 that i6 S 89005104" E 26. 910 feet and
S 48041142" W 214. 478 feet from the recognized East 1/16
corner on the line between said Sections 12 and 13, said
1/16 corner being shown as Point No. 289 on Washington
County Surrey No. 19 , 127; thence tracing the centerline
northeasterly along a 450 foot radius curve to the left
through a central angle of 49003118" 385 .277 feet (long
chord bears N 24010 ' 03" E 373. 62 feet) to a point of
tangency and the end of the foregoing described centerline,
said ending point lies N 8943104" E 20 .00 feet and
N 0021136" W 198 . 78 feet from the previously said 1/16
corner (Point No. 289) .
Contains 571 square feet more or less.
Parcel II: Being a portion of S.W. 72nd Avenue also being that '
portion of the tract (described in Fee No. 78-28456 as Exhibit
B-1) dedicated to the public (City of Tigard) , in the southwest
4 of the southeast 4 of Section 12, T.2S. , R1W. , W.M. , City of
Tigard, Washington County, Oregon more particularly described as
being that portion of said Exhibit B-1, Fee No. 78-28456 that lies
westerly of a line that is westerly 30 feet at right angles and
parallel to the following described centerline:
Beginning at a point of curve in the existing centerline of
County Road A-138 that is S 89005104" E 26.910 feet and
S 48041142" W 214 . 478 feet from the recognized East 1/16
corner on the line between said Sections 12 and 13, said k:
1/16 corner being shown as Point No. 289 on Washington
County Survey No. 19 , 127; thence tracing the centerline
northeasterly along a 450 foot radius curve to the left
through a central angle of 49103 ' 18" 385. 277 feet (long
chord bears N 24010 ' 03" E 373 . 62 feet) to a point of
tangency; thence N 0021 ' 36" W 2447. 58 feet to a point and F
the end of the foregoing described centerline, said ending
point lies N 89040144" E 20. 00 feet from an iron pipe with
a brass cap at the recognized 1/16 corner, said 1/16 corner
shown as Point "P" on County Survey No. 13,247.
i
Contains 946 Square feet more or less. i
RESOLUTION No. 82- 80
EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT "B"
NOTICE OF STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING
RELATING TO PORTIONS OF S.W. 72ND AVENUE, A DEDICATED PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON-
Pursuant to Resolution No. 82- 80 of the City Council of Tigard,
adopted July 26, 1982, under authority of ORS 271.130 , a public
hearing will be held by the Council of Tigard at 7 : 30 p.m. on
Monday, Sept. -.13, 1982, at Fowler Junior High School, Lecture
Room, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, with respect to the
proposed vacation of the following described portions of S.W. 72nd
Avenue, a dedicated public right-of-way in the City of Tigard,
Washington County, Oregon.
Two parcels of land more particularly described as follows:
Parcel I: Being a portion of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road also
being that portion of the tract (described in Fee No. 78-28456 as
Exhibit B-2) dedicated to the public (City of Tigard) , in the
northwest h of the northeast 4 of Section 13, T.2S. , R-1W W-I"i- •
City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon more particularly
described as being that portion of said Exhibit B-2, Fee No. 78-28456
that lies northwesterly of a line that is northwesterly 30 feet at
right angles and parallel to the following described centerline:
Beginning at a point of curve in the existing centerline t�
of County Road A-138 that is S 89005104" E 26 .910 feet
and S 48041142" W 214.478 feet from the recognized East
1/16 corner on the line between said Sections 12 and 13,
said 1/16 corner being shown as Point No. 289 on Washington
County Survey No. 19,127; thence tracing the centerline
northeasterly along a 450 foot radius curve to the left
through a central angle of 49003' 18" 385. 277 feet (long
chord bears N 24'1010311 E 373 .62 feet) to a point of
tangency and the end of the foregoing described centerline,
said ending point lies N 89043104" E 20 . 00 feet and
N 0021136" W 198 . 78 feet from the previously said 1/16 t
corner (Point No. 289) .
Contains 571 square feet more or less.
a
Parcel II: Being a portion of S.W. 72nd Avenue also being that
portion of the tract (described in Fee No. 78-28456 as Exhibit B-1)
dedicated to the public (City of Tigard) , in the southwest : of
the southeast 4 of Section 12, T.2S. , R. 1W. , W.M. , City of Tigard,
Washington County, Oregon more particularly described as being
that portion of said Exhibit B-1, Fee No. 78-28456 that lies
westerly of a line that is westerly 30 feet at right angles and
parallel to the following described centerline:
RESOLUTION No. 82-80
EXHIBIT "B" - 1
s
Beginning at a point of curve in the existing centerline
of County Road A-138 that is S 89005104" E 26. 910 feet
and S 48°41142" W 214 . 478 feet from the recognized East
1/16 corner on the line between said Sections 12 and 13,
said 1/16 corner being shown as Point No. 289 on Washington
County Survey No. 19 , 127; thence tracing the centerline
northeasterly along a 450 foot radius curve to the left
through a central angle of 4903 ' 18" 385. 277 feet (long
chord bears N 2410 ' 03" E 373.62 feet) to a point of -
tangency;
f _tangency; thence N 002113611 W 2447 .58 feet to a point
and the end of the foregoing described centerline, said
ending point lies N 89140144" E 20.00 feet from an iron
pipe with a brass cap at the recognized 1/16 corner, said
1/16 corner shown as Point "P" on County Survey No. 13,247.
Contains 946 square feet more or less.
Any objections or remonstrances against said proposal to vacate
said areas may be made in writing and filed with the City Recorder
prior to the date of the hearing and all objections filed prior to
the date of hearing will be heard and considered, and any person
having an interest in the proposal may likewise verbally be heard
at said time and place.
By Order of the City Council of Tigard, this 26th day of July, 1982.
l
Doris Hartig !'
City Recorder
TT Publish July 29 , and August 5, 12 , 19 , 1982
RESOLUTION No. 82- 80
EXHIBIT "B" - 2
WNW
Mann
t l
f CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON
E.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 - 1100
A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD 'CITY COUNCIL AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 82-80 CALLING
FOR A STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING FOR 72ND AVENUE (Killian Property).
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has determined that it is necessary to hold a
public hearing to vacate a portion of SW 72nd Avenue; and
WHEREAS. Resolution No. 82-80 must be amended to change the date of the public
hearing for this issue.
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIGARD AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Section 1 of Resolution No.. 82-80 be amended by changing the
date or the public hearing from September 13, 1982 to October 25. 1982.
Section 2. That Section 2 of Resolution No. 82-80 be amended by changing the
date of the first publication of notice of public hearing to September 23.
1982 and that it shall be published once each week thereafter for five
publishings in all.
Section 3. That Exhibit "B" "Notice of Street Vacation Public Hearing" shall
be changed to reflect the hearing date of October 25, 1982.
PASSED: By Council on the 13th day of September, 1982.
Mayor - City of Tigard O
ATTEST:
i
Recorder - City of Ti ar
1
RESOLUTION NO. 82407
( November 15, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Department of Planning Development;-�
SUBJECT: CPA-5-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
The Comprehensive Plan Report: Citizen Involvement is the first of eleven
comprehensive plan and support documents which will be reviewed for adoption.
Briefly, this report contains information about the various ways in which
citizens can get involved in the planning process. It also lists the policies
and implementation strategies which the City and community will use to
maintain the citizen involvement process.
This report has been reviewed by the Neighborhood Planning Organizations and
the Committee for Citizen Involvement (CCI). It was suggested by these groups
that the Citizen Involvement Report be forwarded to the Planning Commission
for public review. On November 9, 1982 the Planning Commission reviewed and
approved the Citizen Involvement Report with minor wording changes. The
document before you reflects those changes.
At the end of the Citizen Involvement Report, staff has included an appendix.
The information for the appendix will be inserted once the report is sent to
LCDC for acknowledgment. Please refer to the table of contents for the type
of information that will be included in the appendix.
Action
The Planning Commission is requesting that the City Council review the
Comprehensive Plan Report: Citizen Involvement during a public hearing and
adopt it as an element of the Comprehensive Plan effective January 1, 1982.
M
!_
Comprehensive Plan Report
`s
FINAL DRAFT FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
CITYOFTIGrARD
WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON
.i
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
TIGARD PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
JUNE, 1982
Revised October 1982
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
Wilbur Bishop - Mayor Frank Tepedino - President
John Cook Donald Moen
Tom Brian Richard Helmer
Nancie Stimler Mark Christen
Kenneth Scheckla Roy Bonn
Phil Eden
Bonnie Owens
Cliff Speaker
Deane Leverett
i
f
COMMITTEE FOR CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
Wilbur Bishop - Mayor
Frank Tepedino - Planning Commission President f
Ronald Jordan - Park Board Chairman
John A. Butler - NPO #1
Bruce Clark - NPO #2
Lou Ane Mortensen - NPO #3
Gordon S. Martin - NPO #4
Chris Vanderwood - NPO #5
Phillip A. Pasteris - NPO #6
Nancy Robbins - NPO #7
CITY STAFF
Bob Jean, City Administrator
Bill Monahan, Planning and Development Director
Jeremy Coursolle, Associate Planner
Liz Newton, Associate Planner
Frank Currie, Public Works Director
Patt Martin, Word Processor
DRAFT: For Disscussion Purposes Only
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
SECTION Page
Introduction 1
Background 2
Citizen Participation in
Comprehensive Planning 3
Communication and Technical
4
Information
Adoption of Comprehensive Plan 5
Finding, Policies and Implementing 5
Strategies
APPENDIX 8
LCDC approval of Tigard's Citizen Involvement
program and accompanying City Resolutions 8 & 9
Committee for Citizen Involvement 21
(Members)
Neighborhood Planning Organization 22
NPO #1
NPO #2 23
NPO #3 24
NPO #4 25
NPO #5 26
NPO #6 27
NPO #7 28
Revised Neighborhood Planning
Organization Resolution 20
Committee for Citizen Involvement 25
Evaluation
List of Committee for Citizen Involvement
meeting dates and agendas 26
List of Neighborhood Planning Organization
meeting dates and agendas
i
-2-
Man
INTRODUCTION
This report provides background information on a citizen involvement program
for Tigard in relation to LCDC Goal 1 - Citizen Involvement. In addition, it
recommends findings and policies to meet Goal 1 requirements.
The Goal #1 statement reads: "to develop a citizen involvement program that
insures the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the
planning process".
"The governing body charged with preparing and adopting a comprehensive
plan shall adopt and publicize a program for citizen involvement that
clearly defines the procedures by which the general public will be
involved in the ongoing land use planning process.
The citizen involvement program shall be appropriate to the scale of the
planning effort. The program shall provide for continuity of citizen
participation and of information that enables citizens to identify and
comprehend the issues".
This report begins with a brief history of Tigard's citizen participation with
the initial resolutions of the Neighborhood Planning Organizations (NPO) City
Ordinance 75-60, and the Committee for Citizen Involvement (CCI), City
Ordinance 75-61. It is followed by a discussion of citizen involvement, and
suggests methods for continuing citizen participation throughout
implementation and updating of the City's comprehensive plan.
i
-1-
BACKGROUND
FORMULATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING
Citizen interest in the planning process and the formulation of community
goals began with adoption of Tigard's Community Plan in July of 1971 (City
Ordinance 71-15). In 1973, the City Administrator and the City Council
recognized the need for the formation of Neighborhood Planning Organizations
(NPO): to develop communication channels between the citizens of Tigard and
the city officials increasing the livability of the community.
The City of Tigard was divided into seven neighborhood areas, the boundaries
of which were defined by the Planning Commission. These boundaries may be
altered if agreed upon by the affected neighborhood planning organizations.
recognizing
In 1975, the City Council passed a resolution formally reco g � g
Neighborhood Planning Organization and the Committee for Citizen Involvement
as the official citizen involvement structures within :the City of Tigard. The
purpose of these organizations is to act as advisory groups to the Planning
Commission and City Council on all matters affecting their neighborhood and
city.
The first Neighborhood Planning Organization, NPO #1, had their neighborhood
plan adopted by the City Council in May of 1974. Briefly, this nplan
the included
Tigard
the goals of the community which were adopted by city l
Community Plan in 1971, a description of the physical characteristics of the
neighborhood area, a land use map and use descriptions, area problems and
policies to alleviate those problems, traffic generation, and street standards.
Since 1974, the remaining Neighborhood Planning Organizations had their
neighborhood plans adopted by the City Council; the last of which was NPO #7
in February of 1979.
After adoption of the NPO plans, some interest diminished and a few of the NPO
groups became inactive. Presently, most of the seven-plus member Neighborhood
Organizations meet on a monthly basis to discuss such topics as development
proposals within their area, procedural matters within the NPO Organization
and future planning needs within their planning area inside and outside the
existing city limits, yet inside the Tigard urban planning area.
The City is currently in the process of re-estalishing interest of the
membership those Neighborhood Planning Organizations that have been inactive
in the past few years.
In order to ensure that communication channels stay then between the general
Planning Commission,
populace, the Neighborhood Planning Organizations,
the City Council and the City officials, the Council also initiated a
Committee for Citizen's Involvement. The Committee's goals and definitions
were further revised and updated in 1979. Briefly, this committee includes
the chairperson of each Neighborhood Planning Organization, the Planning
Commission Chairperson, a member of Council, a Park Board member and members
of the City staff.
-2-
FIGURE I
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION BOUNDARIES
UL
13
T/GARD & V/C/N/T Y ( (7
Lam- r I�
MV'O {aa•+c.1..Oye5 /tiFe Ga�Y t�►t a —���.,, � U�.z..•_ '=�''�- _.
L91 r�
Lnld M.-
IN
1 _
�
lye
ID
1 ti
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING
Throughout the existence of the Neighborhood Planning Organizations, the
original goals and policies of the Tigard Community Plan and each of the
neighborhood plans have been reviewed and implemented in all aspects of the
land use decisions. As the City of Tigard grew, the overall Community Plan
remained a static document and subsequently the individual neighborhood plans
as adopted became "mini" Comprehensive Plans. While these neighborhood plans
met the immediate neighborhood needs, they did not address or implement the
overall growth needs of the community.
In late 1981, the City Council, staff and the Neighborhood Planning
Organizations saw the need to revise and update the community's Comprehensive
Plan.
For most of the elements of the Comprehensive plan, staff or consultants will
be collecting data and writing the draft report containing analysis, and
recommended findings and policies, which will be reviewed by the Neighborhood
Planning Organizations, the Committee for Citizen Involvement, the Planning
Commission and the City Council. It is anticipated that these groups will
examine and modify each element draft at the committee and public hearing
levels.
OTHER CITIZEN COMMITTEES
�• In addition to the Neighborhood Planning Organization, there are several other
active citizen committees in Tigard. Citizens can serve on the Budget
Committee which reviews the annual operating budget- for the City, the Park
e
Board which advises the City on all matters pertaining to parks and
recreation, the Tigard Downtown Committee and the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency
Advisory Committee which are in the process of reviewing the Downtown
Revitalization Plan. Other committees include: the Library Board and the
Civic Center Committee.
LAND USE EDUCATION
Those citizens who have participated in the formulation of the existing
Neighborhood Plans have received an informal land use planning education. It
is anticipated that all of those people who became involved with the revisions
of the Comprehensive Plan will receive informal land use planning education.
Although the City does not conduct formal classes on land use planning, the
City officials do conduct work sessions with the City Council, Planning
Commission and Neighborhood Planning Organizations to update and increase
their knowledge on land use matters that may affect the Tigard community.
-3-
o.
` C
O
—4
C13
O
n G •b
w x x X d ° •� r+
m .A
G r U r-
cu
�
b O
bo
ca p T
GN G O
+�
to •4 U U
C!1 T _1 H b
v
N•A co
�. OOxxx0X Oxx 4 4-4
�
O cn G w
4 •4 c0 CO
co 7 PL,
CJ
C CO C: 4 u �
®.
co
LL.jH X X x X X r_ .14
o
ao•9 rn
� 2 -4 c eco r
ta_ H W 7
Z u O
O G U ca U
G G
04 �
C d o G
p, vs •.a
~ > �_ �_ N 9 coo u caHt U (O Cl)N C O p A w
—4q:l
E-4
O C � ® O 0) Hca p b m
c- - coCL "" C o
Z- CL a) o0
C
co co O o CO O C2' o G a u
•-I J �+ CO
O C •� '��-' ca C) co O p a c co .. a
0) O •i c� G •cn C Q) cc p' vi ami c�a
U
v CA O U 7CO O m wC —
cm ._ "— CCM 2 j u uo •w caa �
v® OCO E L .O • a
b. C O E U
cm
rn al
C co N tCf a� -C G
LL
QAA OAUNA � Q-- LL' 11 61 � � ai o1
as o x O � U a x G
a6
Mr Nth � td1 CD 1`
C
INN
f
COMMUNICATION AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION
All public meetings are announced in the Community Calendar section of the
Tigard Times, and Portland Oregonian. Public hearings and other citizen
sponsored meetings and workshops displayed in these circulations are often
accompanied by a newspaper article explaining the meeting's issues.
Meeting announcements are mailed to all affected property owners and
applicants for all of the public meetings. Through the revision process of
the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance, staff proposes to send the
various citizen groups newsletters which describe the Planning Commission's or
City Council's progress. To encourage attendance at neighborhood meetings
during the revision process, staff is prepared to assist any citizen
organization to advertise these meetings in the affected neighborhoods. All
public documents concerning land use planning are available for distribution,
or on a loan basis from the Planning Department and will also be placed in the
City Library. Minutes of meetings are sent to committees and hearing
authority members, and are available at the Planning Department for public
review.
The technical information available to local citizens includes assistance by
City staff and the published material and files which form the background of
the Comprehensive Plan. Reference material will be available at the City
Planning Department.
f
-4-
r
ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
r
The review of the Comprehensive Plan is initiated at the NPO level. Staff is
encouraged that many of the major issues that affect the City regarding
comprehensive planning can be resolved at the NPO level. At the Planning
Commission and City Council levels, the various Comprehensive Plan elements
will be presented individually at public hearings where additional citizen
comments will be sought. The Planning Commission will be taking all of the
citizen and Neighborhood Planning Organization comments into full
consideration, and after further reviewing each element, will recommend
elements of the Comprehensive Plan to the City Council. The Council will then
review each particular element, modify it, if necessary, and will then adopt
each element and incorporate them into the Comprehensive Plan.
IMPLEMENTION, EVALUATION AND REVISION
Citizens will have the opportunity to comment as ordinances is developed and
adopted that implements the Comprehensive Plan. One of the major implementing
tools of the Comprehensive Plan will be the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision
codes, which will be revised simultaneously with the Comprehensive Plan
development and made consistent with that plan. Additional public hearings
will also be held for those ordinance revisions. As the Comprehensive Plan is
periodically evaluated and revised, citizens will have the opportunity to
comment prior to the adoption of any amendments of the Comprehensive Plan.
OPPORTUNITY FOR INTERACTION WITH DECISION MAKERS
At the beginning of each City Council meeting, a "Call to Audience" time is
opened for citizens who wish to speak on any matter at a designated time
during the meeting. The Planning Commission allows for general audience input
on agenda items.
Dates, times and locations of all public meetings are publicized in the Tigard
Times and the Portland Oregonian Community Calendar sections, along with a
brief description of the subject of the meeting. Minutes of the Planning
Commission and City Council meetings provide a written record of official's
response to matters heard during the public hearing.
FUNDING
The allocation of specific funding for a citizen involvement program has not
been available in the budget for the City of Tigard. Since the initiation of
the Neighborhood Planning Organization, the City has provided a staff liaison
person for each neighborhood meeting, a place to meet and the cost of printing
informational materials for the neighborhood organizations. It is anticipated
that future trends will include a continuation of the City's support for each
citizen group.
FINDINGS
o Throughout the development of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, the City has
actively sought the participation of Neighborhood Planning Organization
and other citizens groups.
-5-
o Tle Neighborhood Planning Organizations and the Committee for Citizen
Involvement have met on a monthly basis throughout the Comprehensive Plan
revision process.
o Continued citizen participation in all aspects of land use planning helps
to ensure that City government meets the needs of Tigard's citizens.
o In order to participate in land use planning decisions, citizens need to
have access to information which enables them to become aware of and
informed about planning issues and City policies. It is essential that
this information be made available to all citizens in an understandable
form.
o Land use planning education is an important method to promote and
stimulate interest in the citizen participation process during all phases
of planning.
POLICIES
2.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM AND
SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE
INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF THE PLANNING PROCESS.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
,
1. The City wi periodically review notification requirements and methods to
determine if they adequately provide notice to affected citizens and
revise these requirements and methods as necessary.
i14 11
2. The City witl continue to inform, in a timely manner, all of the
Neighborhood Planning Organizations (NPO) and other citizens groups on all
land use planning matters.
3. The City Afirl�- continue to assist and support any City Council recognize
citizen group in providing adequate meeting places, distribution of
materials, policy direction and staff involvement.
S t�z1
4. Additional citizen task forces be appointed by the City Council, as
the need arises, to advise the City with regard to Comprehensive Plan
issues.
2.1.2 THE OPPORTUNIITES FOR CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROVIDED BY THE CITY SHALL BE
APPROPRIATE TO THE SCALE OF THE PLANNING EFFORT AND SHALL INVOLVE A
BROAD CROSS-SECTION OF THE COMMUNITY:
a. THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS SHALL BE THE PRIMARY MEANS FOR
CARRYING OUT THE PROGRAM;
-6-
i
b. WHERE APPROPRIATE OTHER INVOLVEMENT TECHNIQUES WILL BE USED; AND
c. THE COMMITTEE FOR CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
EVALUATING THE PROGRAM AND FOR WORKING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING
ORGANIZATIONS IN RECOMMENDING CHANGES IN THE PROGRAM.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
1. The Committee for Citizen Involvement and the Neighborhood Planning
Organizations shall conduct their citizen involvement programs in
accordance with the needs of the Tigard community and LCDC Goal 1
requirements. A review and evaluation of each group's programs and
processes s!"— be reported to the Planning Commission and City Council
on a yearly basis.
2. The City Council, the Planning Commission the Committee for Citizen
Involvement and the Neighborhood Planning Organization shall recommend, as
needed, additional methods for involving citizens in the planning process.
2.1.3 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT INFORMATION ON LAND USE PLANNING ISSUES IS
AVAILABLE IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE FORM FOR ALL INTERESTED CITIZENS.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
1. The City shall continue to publish information on land use planning issues
in a form accessible to all citizens and shall use the Committee for
Citizen Involvement and Neighborhood Planning Organizations as the
resources for performing such reviews.
-7-
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BOB JEAN, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
i
DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 1982 �f
SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES SUMMARY REPORT
I attended the following sessions and reviewed either new or updated information
on:
OREGON SECTION, INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
o Business Meeting
o Election of Officers
JOINT MEETING, MAYORS AND MANAGERS
o Reducing Property Tax Dependence: California After Proposition 13
o Reduce number of job classifications and institute real merit system
reforms
o Limit liabilities and litigation expenses
o Lobby against State mandated employee benefits
o Regain management rights and flexibility regarding contracting out,
volunteers and lay-offs
o Lobby against unfunded State mandates
o Lobby for stable proportions of State shared revenues
o Lobby for local option sales tax
o Use fees and charges whenever possible
BONDS AND FINANCE
o Bond registration (new requirement and cost)
o Double-Barrelled bonds
o Control interim finance and terms
o Complete all LID's by 1/1/84.
o Consider Charter Amendments re. Revenue Bonds
o Lessons from WPPSS
o Advance refunding
o Leasing, Sale-Leasebacks and Certificates of Participation
KEYNOTE SESSION: CHARLES ROYER, MAYOR, SEATTLE
o Rebirth or retrenchment?
o Federal "partnership" or "no real urban policy"?
o National mobility, environment and economic development are national
interests requiring national urban policy, not lassez-faire.
o Challenge: productivity and creativity, but can we afford risk with
reduced resources?
. . . Continued . . .
MEMO -- MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 22, 1982
PAGE TWO
STATE ROLE IN GROWTH FINANCE
o State should assist with CIP funding out of UGB
o $2.4 Billion needed for maintenance of facilities and $3.9 Billion
for new facilities by year 2000 .in Oregon. . .
o Encourage municipal leasing, perhaps State pool
o Infrastructure and economic development are State concerns re. local
CIP facilities.
o Need new State infrastructure "super fund" from State transfer tax,
increased vehicle registration fees, increased gas tax
o Need to target CIP funds so complete packages are made available, not
piece meal
o Role of LCDC in CIP funds?
GOVERNOR'S TASK FORCE ON LAND USE
o See report
o Streamlining
o Sunset LUBA, create Land Use Court
ELECTED OFFICIALS ROLE IN LABOR RELATIONS
o Understand process and law
o Council's wishes
o Annual assessment of goals and objectives, multi-year goals and strategies
o Process: Recognition, Negotiation and Administration
o Council should set service level objectives, not terms, so negotiator
can negotiate. . .
OTHER SESSIONS
o General Session on Cities' Futures -- Tom Brian
o Mayor's Luncheon and Business Meeting -- Wilbur Bishop
o Urban Renewal Finance -- Martha Bishop
o Council Decision Making -- Tom Brian
o Contracting City Services -- Wilbur Bishop
o The Entrepreneurial City -- Wilbur Bishop
o City Recorders -- Doris Hartig
o LID's -- Tom Brian
o Economic Development -- Bill Monahan
o Streamlining Development Controls -- Bill Monahan
o Private Contractors and City Services -- Wilbur Bishop
The following amendments to Oregon Municipal Policy or Legislative Resolutions
were passed:
i
Revenue and Taxation -- Cities should be allowed more flexibility and local
options, no restrictions on current resources. . .reduce property tax dependence
and property tax exemptions. s
. . . Continued . . .
MEMO -- MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 22, 1982
F PAGE THREE
t
Ethics -- Simplify reporting, code of ethics?
Municipal Court -- Some State funding re. mandates?
Air Pollution -- Local flexibility and State help. . .
Double Taxation -- County services of primary benefit to limited areas should
be financed by those areas, not County-wide.
Resolution on Property Tax Reduction and Sales Tax -- Support Constitutionally
limited Sales Tax to replace and reduce existing Property Taxes.
Resolution on Land Use Planning -- No new LCDC goals for awhile and simplify
appeals. . .
Resolution on Federal Revenue Sharing -- Continue
Resolution on Transportation -- Develop highway funding proposal with State. . .
Resolution on Collective Bargaining -- Allow local selection of impasse resolutions
other than binding arbitration: final offer arbitration, strike, others agreed
upon by union and City. . .Also, limit arbitration to issues presented by the
parties. . .
Resolution on Growth Costs -- Develop CIP funding program and grant increased
annexation authority of UGB.
Public Contracting -- Oppose mandates, retain local decision option of City
Council . . .
Resolution on Anti-Trust Immunity -- Grant cities same immunities as State
has. . .
RWJ : dkr
MEW
Nov. 15-Monday
Subj: League of Oregon Cities 57th Annual Convention
Enclosed for your information is a compilation of
materials handed out at the convention. A handbook for Oregon
City Councilors by the Bureau of Gov. Research and Service U ofO
in cooperation with League of Oregon Cities is now being_ updated
for 1983 distribution. Ore. Municipal Policy 1982 League of Ore.
Cities Local Gov. Cen. booklet is available by writing P.O.
Box 928, 1201 Court St. , N.E. , Salem,; Oregon 97308.
The workshop programs are informative and interestingly
presented. Mr. Laurence R. Sprecher, Public Management Associates,
Beaverton told how entrepreneurial ideas can benefit city service
costs. He covered Theory of Leadership-Management roles
within a City-Pressure-Team effectiveness-Council Decision Making.
Factors affecting the Productivity of the Cluncil - Manager team.
His sessions were well attended by the newly elected Councilpersons,
as well as many other seasoned elected officials.
Parks and Recreation pointed out a need to have local city
maps showing the town± s recreational locations and indicating
facilities provided noting each town has high values in these
properties and should encourage use of them especially thru tourism.
Note enc. Wilsonville Chamber of Commerce putlication.
According to Seattle Mayor Charles Royer who in two weeks
will assume the presidency of the National League of Cities at its
i
annual Congress of Cities in Los Angles @The cornerstone of the
current administration*s urban policy is the most major shift from
the federal level to the states and cities we have ever seen".
s
The central question raised so far at the league*s
gathering has been whether Oregon should adopt some form of sales �
tax to offset escalating and unpopular property tax revenues. ��
November 17, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Legal Services
City Attorney, Ed Sullivan and I have been receiving our Legal Services and
working to control the total costs. This year we budgeted $70,000 apart from
LID costs. The first quater of this year we spent $21,400 and at that rate
could effect to spend $85,000 - $100,000 without LID costs. Last year we
spent $100,000.
Ed and I would like to recommend an alternative approach, since our current
pattern is not acceptable to any of us despite our best efforts and good
services. Ed and I recommend a retainer agreement where a Staff Attorney from
Ed's office would be assigned to us at City Hall half time at a reduced hourly
rate. The monthly retainer for the Staff Attorney would be $4,000/month
starting in January, 1983. Limitied services on Labor Relations, Land Use and
Ed's time at Council would still be additional outside the retainer.
Under the retainer agreement we should be able to keep this year's total cost
without LID's to $80,000. At the same time we will have reduced our quarterly
average cost down to $18,000 by July, 1983 or an average of $72,000/year.
i
Not only will the retainer get us closer to the $70,000 we originally budgeted
and avoid the $100,000 we seem leaded for, we will actually get more hours of
service under the retainer.
ch
:t
i.
i
t
f`
I
{
SUSAN SCHNEIDER
2730 N.E. Knott Days : 222-4404
Home : 282-3655
Portland, Or 97212
EDUCATION NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL OF LAW, Portland, Oregon-
J.D. expected May 1982
WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY, Salem, Oregon.
B.A. , Political Science, 1971
SCHILLER COLLEGE , Kleiningersheim, W. Germany .
September 1969 - May 1970
Other:
U. S. Civil Service Commission, City/County Govern-
mental Bookkeeping and Accounting, 1976
Oregon State Division of Continuing Education, Program
Planning for Managers , 1975
Survey of Approaches to Local Government Budgeting,
1975
Oregon Personnel Institute, Seminar on Oregon Equal
Opportunity Laws , 1976
Willamette University, Managing the Urban Polity, 1974
WORK EXPERIENCE LAW CLERK, Summer 1980 & Summer 1981 to present
O'Donnell , Sullivan & Ramis
Portland, Or
Supervisor : Edward J. Sullivan, Partner
Work includes preparation of ordinances , memorandums ;
direct contact with clients ; general research.
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT, March 1975 to January 1978
Department of Community Development, City of Salem, Or
Supervisor : Robert Briscoe, Asst. City Manager
Assistant to the Director of a department which includ-
ed urban renewal , subsidized housing and planning.
My primary responsibilities were budget preparation
and analysis, and administration of a $3. 2 million a
year federally funded community development program.
COMMUNITY SERVICE COUNSELOR, January 1972 to March 1975
Urban Renewal Agency, City of Salem, Or
Supervisor : Robert J. Holmes, Renewal Administrator
Responsible for outreach and organization of a neigh-
borhood association for development of a neighborhood
plan.
OTHER EXPERIENCE Assisted the Honorable Judge D. Ashmanskas in
the preparation of article on historic preserva-
tion for the C.L.E. Handbook on Land Use to be
published in 1981 .
Assisted Professor Lenard DuBoff in preparation
of law review article on the application of U.S .
Customs law to the importation of art.
INTERESTS City of Portland Budget Advisory Committee, Bureau
of Planning; and City Wide Coordinating Committee
1981-1982
Alumni Board, Willamette University, 1981-1983
Historic Preservation League of Oregon, member of
the organizing committee, member and secretary/
treasurer of the Board of Directors , 1978
Opportunities Industrialization Center, Salem
Chapter, member of the Board of Directors, 1977
Italic handwriting, northern Italian cooking,
gardening and politics .
REFERENCES References and writing sample available upon request.
REFERENCES FOR SUSAN SCHNEIDER
Edward J. Sullivan, Attorney at Law
O'DONNELL, SULLIVAN & RADIIS
1727 N.W. Hoyt St.
Portland, Oregon 97209
503/222-4402
Robert J. Holmes, Project Development Manager
CARMA DEVELOPERS
1319 2nd Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
206/623-1300
Robert Briscoe, Assistant City Manager
CITY OF SALEM, DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City Hall, 555 Liberty St. S.E.
Salem, Oregon 97301
503/588-6000
Robert Myers , Professor of Law
LEWIS & CLARK LAW SCHOOL
10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, Oregon 97219
503/244-1181
Edward J. Brunet, Professor of Law
LEWIS & CLARK LA14 SCHOOL
10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, Oregon 97219
503/244-1181
Dr. Susan M. Leeson, Associate Professor of Political Science
(J.D. expected Dec. , 1981)
WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY
State Street
Salem, Oregon 97301
503/588-6321
L
00 W
N
G O
6I O� o OW O Co o O O 00 O t o O
E r O N Ln O O O r N O v O O
Ico Ln ,--i N O r .-� O .r .-+ Ln Cl
cn
O O
W p O O O O �
z O o o V) o ,� r
O Ln N
raj O^ cc,; .O
c', O O O O O
O N O C) W p
p O
x� c o 0 0 C 0
co p O O O O O O
O O n G
01 O p Vl
W
W 1
O p O O p O
O W I OO ccD
= I Lrf Ln
W +
co
a,
D,
1
4I cD
co ol00 00 OLn Ln I O O
H
W u
U C
Cao
a O O O c) O O
p U O I O U
N Ln Ln Ln N O Ln U
d
aq N v1 uy L
E a
Z o!1
O
U 7
O CD C� InLr Ln I p O O O I O O K1
N N 'i `i N
Ln Ln
Cn O
W
U u
f-4 d
CD co O cn O rn 00 1 00 O cn O r+
EI Ln O N Ln r c)a, O N N of en d T
ca
w U N C7 O O r �O
W Ln a0 cl c•1 N d L
.i
p N N '"� ",� ,-I M Ln r r N rn U
6 6
U O
W 3+
T
v
a L
[dr W d W 6Pad w6a16 W dagd cadoad POdWd rtld `°
t+
O
E Ov10000 Orn CD lo OInO 1 Ov1 C>%o O 1 0a. OO O O c"1 �'1 a
Rl a F Oco000N Orn 0I1 Ln 4vlO Or 'n cn OOOLnI 'n C) O N lo � y
Ocn 00 cD ulN Orn N c, 1 C.a N cn Ln I �/lN r - ..
6 dW C�1 .t.-+�1 r+ cn r+N N �n�O �-1 a0.-� .-+ O �--� cn 'O
a C
E-
0 I N N r+
EW+O y d 0
Z U d d U
O[�
U
fn 6 W d d W d W 6 W 6 GG 6 F H O f
6 �
O W' L
O Z O 6 H Woo
W y O H a a q [n a E. q a
6 0a' a a O a w a W .a d W 6 H N a H ca
H Z a El U N vi w T-. H P'.. H Z WW dd W WW H E a C] W d N
U O H 7 W H H Z O U .� H Z dG U Z W O O O Z S
H Z W cn O O Z W O H W H H F a n O H
6U Z WU' W 14 0 q Z6 ' � UOram z E-
ll
II 0 p O p O
d cpU 0 0 0 0 WO O O pc O W O
a
O O !n U O O H is
00
L
Cn
cu W
G1
�W O
a p O O O O O O O O O O O
d O N O O O N O v1 O O
O r` .--� p r+ .-� Ln O
E v1 r+ N O t .-r t� 0
'r �
OO O
'141
c', O O O O u'f c>
.Z O O Ln N Ow ;.
O
p O O O
£I N O co
co
O
O O
GG O 0 O O O O
6I d l r n
N I oo p O O Co O O O
p v1 N O
a
WW 1
O
O W� 00 O O I O Q
U W 11 O C: p v1 u'1
oo
vo
rn
rn z I o po upi (Dl 0 0
E
W L
U O
Q y
PQ O O O O O O 0 O 0 O
O ul O O U
W N 1pf1 V1 v\ N O L U
d
a
E a!
z °D
U
p O O O PQ
C C
O�I N N ul vl
2 N 1 Ln v1
N O
W u
U y
H d
O O O N v1a, O'r, 1 00 O t+1 co
O O N N W til �t 'T
IN ('f O O n �D v1 v1 c0 of ch N d
W .+cnO� U
O
C7 w
W
a
T
r+
m
H P:l DO6Wd ;Q po6 tA6W6 PQ m pg6Wd Wd N
O E Ov1 O000 Ocn0- lO O v) a 1 C. OlO O 1 Ornl 00 O O m c+1p coP.
OGOOOON Op�Ov1 v,Nv,O ONuIOD C. C. In C, O N ^ O'111111i1
O V'1 O O ul O Lf N O OO Oi N M In
r]�: M d r-1 J v1 lO ~ co
lu
00
E
Cn d m
El
i .+
Cpl d d U
O W
U W+ * 'O
.1� is iC
* sri6oa e. Wdgd W d W d LC ¢ Cpd W 6Pa6 r� 6 o u O
Q 6 6 wo
A4 pOpcc�� W U O O H .d.7 O A ti H .~-1 Q d 'd
aC0 E-
aC a a
pn'• R: H C69WWU' 3 H N W U W
V O N Z W F N4 O U a .~-1 H F H a W d _°
U
n o w a � � � ww �w x o a
P. o
d va U 0 o 0 N o o 'd 0 o 04 0 o w o o cpi�cpi� v o o H u
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 82-
RESOLUTION RECORDING THE DESIRE OF THE CITY OF TIGARD TO ACQUIRE JURISDICTION OF
CERTAIN COUNTY ROADS, OR PARTS THEREOF, WITHIN THE CITY OF TIGARD NOW UNDER
JURISDICTION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON-
WHEREAS,
REGON.W EREAS, pursuant to ORS 373.270, the City Council of Tigard deems it necessary,
expedient and for the best interests of the City to acquire jurisdiction over the
County roads or parts thereof set forth on the attached sheets denoted Exhibits "A"
(Road Listing) and "B" (Map) , and by this reference made a part hereof, to enable
the City to exercise jurisdiction with respect thereto to the same extent as it has
over other public streets and alleys of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Public Works of Washington County, Oregon, has heretofore
stated its willingness to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that juris-
diction of certain County roads with the City of Tigard be relinquished to the City
upon request,
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Tigard:
(a) "That the City Council of Tigard does hereby record its desire that it
is necessary, expedient and in the best interests of the City to acquire
jurisdiction of those County roads, or parts thereof, now within the City
as tabulated on the attached Exhibit "A" to the same extent as the City
exercises jurisdiction over other public streets or alleys in the City.
(b) "That a request is hereby made to the Board of County commissioners of
Washington County, Oregon, to initiate such proceedings as required by
ORS 373.370 to effect the transfer of jurisdiction to the City of Tigard
of said streets, roads or parts thereof as listed on the attached Exhibit
"A".
(c) "That in connection with any transfer of said streets or roads to the City
of Tigard, that the County Commissioners cause to have documented, assembled
and submitted to the City the following with respect to each road, street
or part thereof.
1. Legal description of such street, road or part thereof to be trans-
ferred to the City.
2. Copies of all engineering plans with respect to the construction of
said streets, installation of storm sewers, sanitary sewers and other
public utilities as may exist of (County) public record.
3. Certified copies of all permits, easements or agreements for the use
of lands within the right-of-way of said streets or roads for sewers,
drains, public utilities or private uses of any kind, including maintenance
bonds or contracts applicable ther:2to, as may exist of (County) public
record."
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL this day of , 1982.
i
City Recorder - City of Tigard
f
ATTEST:
4
6
{i
t
Mayor - City of Tigard
i
I
I
i
i
I
i
i
I
i
1
RESOLUTION NO. 82-
Page 2
BX N l 8IT A"
CITY OF TIGARD
1. S.W. Franklin Street lying between S.W. 66th Ave. and S.W. 69th Ave.
Approx. 820' 2S1 1
2. S.W. 69th Ave. lying between S.W. Clinton Street and S.W. Hampton Street_
Approx. 2550' 2S1 1 & 1S1 36
3. S.W. 68th Ave. lying betwwen S.W. Franklin Street and S.W. Gonzaga Street.
Approx. 530' 2S1 1
4. S.W. Clinton Street lying 550' easterly of S.W. 69th Ave.
Approx. 550' 1S1 36
5. S.W. 87th Ct. lying north of S.W. McDonald Street.
Approx. 430' 2S1 2
6. S.W. Barman Dr. lying east of S.W. Garrett St.
Approx. 450' 2S1 2
7. S.W. Edgewood St. lying between S.W. Omara St. and S.W. Omara St.
Approx. 2600' 2S1 2
8. S.W. Omara St. lying between S.W. McDonald St. and S.W_ Hall Blvd.
Approx. 4030' 2S1 2
9. S.W. HillviL-,a Ct. lying East of S.W. Omara St.
Approx. 300' 2S1 2
10. S.W. McDonald St. lying between S.W. Hall Blvd. and 500' east of S.W. Pacific Hwy.
Approx. 5030' 2S1 2
11. S.W. 102nd lying between 0'.W. McDonald St. and S.W. Hill View St.
Approx. 370' 2S1 2
12. S.W. Ash Ave. between S.W. McDonald and S.W. Garrett St. ; S-W. Garrett St. from-
Ash
romAsh Ave. to a point 1100' northwesterly.
Approx. 2400' 2S1 2
13. S.W. Frewing St. between S.W. Omara St. and S.W_ Ash St. ; S.W. Frewing lying
between the northerly and southerly corners of Lot 18, Frewing Orchard Tracts.
Approx. 1020' 2S1 2
14. S.W. 109th Ave. north from S.W. Naeve St.1230'
Approx. 1230' 2S1 10.
15. S.W. Naeve St. between S.W. 109th Ave. and S.W. Pacific Hwy. ; S.W. 109th Aqe.
south from S.W. Naeve St. 100' .
Approx. 1120' 2S1 10
2.6. S.W. Durham Road from S.W. Hall Blvd. to a point 4400' westerly, S.W. Durham
Road between S.W. 108th Ave. and a point 430' westerly.
Approx. 4830' 2S1 11 & 2S1 10.
17. S.W. 100th Ave. between S.W. Murdock St. and S.W. Sattler St. ; S.W. Sattler
St. between S.W. 100th Ave. and S.W. 98th Ave.
Approx. 1750' 2S1 11
18. S.W. Sattler St. between S.W. 98th Ave. and S.W. Hall Blvd.
Approx 3330' 2S1 11
19. S.W. Kable St. from S.W. 100th westward 450' ; S.W. Hood View Dr. from S.W.
Kable St. a distance of 600' .
Approx. 1050' 2S1 11.
20. S.W. Darnel Ct. ; S.W. 96th Between S.W. Sattler St. and a point 550' north.
Approx. 800' 2S1 11
21. S.W. Marilyn Ct. ; S.W. 96th from S.W. Murdock St. south 350' ; S.W. Murdock
St. from S.W. 97th Ave. southeasterly to dead end.
Approx. 1000' 2S1 11
22. S.W. Elrose Ct. east of S.W. 93rd Ave. ; S.W. 93rd Ave. south of S.W. McDonald
St. for a distance of 800' ; S.W. Mountain View Lane 350' easterly and 500'
westerly of S.W. 93rd Ave.
-Approx. 1950' 2S1 11
23. S.W. 98th south of S.W. Sattler St. 970' .
Approx. 970' 2S1 11
24. S.W. 100th Ave. between S.W. Murdock St. and S.W. McDonald St.
3 Approx. 2250' 2S1 11
25. S.W. 103rd between S.W. Murdock St. and S.W. Driftwood Lane; S.W. Murdock St.
between S.W. 98th Ave. and S.W. 103rd Ave.
Approx. 1740' 2S1 11
26. S.W. View Terr. east of S.W. 100th Ave. ; S.W. View Ct. north of S.W. View Ter.
Approx. 730' 2S1 11
27. S.W. View Terr. east of S.W. 103rd Ave.
Approx. 360' 2S1 11
28. S.W. 103rd Ave. south of S.W. Murdock St. ; S.W. Del Monte Dr. west 200' .
Approx. 850' 2S1 11
29. S.W. 104th Ave. between S.W. Murdock St. and S.W. Del Monte Dr. ; S.W. Del Monte
Dr. lying inside "Del Monte Subdivision No. 2".
Approx. 700' 2S1 11
30. S.W. 97th Ave. between S.W. McDonald St. and S.W. Murdock St. ; S.W. Murdock St.
between S.W. 97th Ave. and S.W. 98th Ave. ; S.W. 98th Ave. between S.W. Murdock
St. and S.W. Sattler St.
Approx. 3400' 2S1 11
C 31. S.W. Bonita Rd. between S.W. Hall Blvd. and S.W. 76th Ave.
Approx. 2200' 2S1 12
32. S.W. 79th between S.W. Bonita Rd. and S.W. Durham Rd.
Approx. 3960' 2S1 12
33. S.W. Ross St. between S.W. Hall Blvd. and S.W. 81st Ave; S.W. 81st Ave. between
S.W. Bonita Road and S.W. Ross St.
Approx. 2580' 2S1 12
34. S.W. 74th Ave. between S.W. Durham Rd- and a point 3600' north.
Approx. 3600' 2SI 12 & 2S1 13
35. S.W. Fanno Creek P1. northwesterly 420' from S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Rd.
Approx. 420' 2S1 13
36. S.W. Cascade Ave. between S.W. Breenburg Rd. and S.W. Scholls Ferry Rd.
Approx. 4000' 1S1 26, 27 & 35
37. S.W. Greenberg Rd. between S.W. Cascade Ave. and S.W. Tiedeman Ave.
Approx. 1000' 1S1 35
38. S.W. Greenberg Rd. between S.W. 95th Ave. and S.W. Tiedeman Ave.
Approx. 1800' 1S1 35
39. S.W. Tiedeman Ave. south of S.W. Tigard St. a distance of 800' .
Approx. 800' 1S1 35
40. S.W. Tigard St. 400' southeasterly of S.W. Tiedeman Ave.
-Approx. 400' 1S1 35
41 S.W. Tigard St, north of lot 10 of Greenberg Heights Add. a distance of 450' .
Approx. 450' 1S1 35
42. S.W. 95th Ave. north of S.W. North Dakota St. a distance of 100' and south of
S.W. North Dakota St. a distance of 400' . -
Approx. 500' IS1 35
43. S.W. Tigard St. between S.W. Tiedeman Ave. and S.W. 115th; S.W. 115th Ave.
between S.W. Tigard St. and S.W. North Dakota St.
Approx. 4070' 1S1 34 & 35
44. S.W. Sumner Crest Drive west of S.W. 121st. Ave. ; S.W. Summer St. between S.W. }
121st. Ave. and S.W. Summer Crest Dr.
Approx 2150' 1S1 34
i
45. S.W. 121st Ave. south of S.W. North Dakota St. a distance .,f 1000' .
Approx. 1000' 1S1 34
46. S.W. North Dakota St. from S.W. 115th Ave. to a point 130' east of S.W. 106th
Ave. ; S.W. North Dakota St, from S.W. Tiedeman Ave_ to a point 310' east of S.W.
106th Ave.
Approx. 3880' 1S1 34 & 35
47. S.W. Am St. from S.W. 121st Ave. to a point 250' east; S.W. Lynn St. from S.W.
121st Ave. to a point 330' east; S.W. 119th Ave. from S.W. Lynn St. 110' north.
Approx. 690' 2S1 3
48. S.W. Walnut St. between S.W. 123rd Ave. and S.W. 124th Ave.
Approx. 460' 2S1 3
i
{
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JOY MARTIN, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
DATE: NOVEMBER 12, 1982 /
SUBJECT: OBTAINING VOTER REACTION TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
REQUESTED ACTIONS
The following decisions need to be made if Council wants to have citizen input
on tax increment financing prior to December 31 , 1982.
1. Should there be an official poll involving every registered voter, or
"to occupant"? The former will be more "official-like." The later will
mean one per address with broader community-wide but. also non-voter input.
2. When does Council need the results of the poll? If Council would want
to repeal the tax increment financing portion of the plan, this must be
done prior to December 31, 1982, to take effect in 1983.
3. Should the City do an attitude questionnaire? If so, should it be sent
to the entire City along with the official poll , or should it be separate,
perhaps only to a sample of the City? Cost impacts are obviously involved
here as well .
FACTS
At the October 18 Council meeting, the options available for obtaining citizen
advice were discussed. The decision was to wait until after the general election
and for staff to have a questionnaire available if desired.
PROCESS
The minimum amount of time necessary for each step is shown below. In order
to have the results from a poll to Council by the December 20 meeting, the
process must begin immediately:
Draft Poll/Questionnaire Staff November 15
Pre-Test Questionnaire 14 days Nov. 15-29
Revise, Finalize, Print, Mail Quest. 5 days (maybe) Nov. 29-Dec. 3
Return Poll/Questionnaire 14 days Dec. 3-17
Results of Poll to Council 1 day Dec. 20
Follow-Ups for Questionnaire 14 days (28 if nec. ) Dec. 20-Jan. 4
Coding, Preparation for Analysis
Analysis January
. . . Continued . . .
NNW
MEMO -- MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 12, 1982
PAGE TWO
DISCUSSION
The purpose of the Questionnaire would be to obtain citizen quidance or attitudes
on the importance of certain city services. It is not specifically an evaluation
questionnaire. It is hoped that this information will be useful to both Council
and to the Budget Committee in deciding on goals and priorities with the
possibility of reduced funds. Departments will be preparing initial drafts of
their budgets in February based on this process.
COST ESTIMATE
The following is a summary of funds available and estimated cost of preparing the
Questionnaire.
NOV.- JAN.- MAY-
BUDGET Y.T.D. DEC. FEB. MARCH APRIL JUNE TOTAL
NEWSLETTER
POSTAGE $8,000 $2,350 $ 785 $ 785 $ 785 $ 785 $ 785 $ 6,275
PRINTING 7,000 1,525 510 510 510 510 510 4,075
NEWSLETTER: $1,500 $3,875 $1,295 $1,295 $1,295 $1,295 $1,295 $10,350
QUESTIONNAIRE
VOTERS LABELS $ 150 $ 150
POSTAGE (2-WAY) 3,500 3,500
PRINTING 550 550
QUESTIONNAIRE: $4,200 $ 4,200
* TOTAL: $15,000 $3,875 $5,495 $1,295 $1,295 $1,295 $1,295 $14,550
* Newsletter and Questionnaire
JM : dkr
J- - -
NOV i 1•
TO: BOB JEAN
FROM: CHRIS VANDERWOOD, NPO #5 CHAIRPERSON
RE: PLAN DESIGNATION - HALL & BONITA
DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 1982
Per our telephone conversation of today, the following is what has
transpired regarding the above referenced property.
The NPO 5 membership is opposed to the C-N plan designation. On
October 25, 1982 we submitted a memo to City Staff requested changes
to the plan within NPO 5. We requested that the subject site be
changed to residential-medium density.
The staff has denied our request, a copy of the letter is attached.
The staff instructed us to pursue the issue thru the quasi-judicial
process, thus, leading to my request today for placement on the City
Council Agenda.
The NPO would prefer that the change be initiated thru the legislative
process and I will take your suggestion and bring the matter to the
CCI for their input.
"l
r
z"
November 2, 1982
CITYOFTIGARD
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
Chris Vanderwood, Chairperson
Neighborhood Planning Organization #5
14345 SW 80th Place
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Chris:
Per our work program, the City is now in the process of addressing those written
comments submitted from all of the local interest groups. We are pleased to re-
view the work that your NPO had accomplished in a relatively short period of
time, and we look forward to working with NPO #5 to resolve the issues that will
affect the City in the next couple of years.
This letter is divided into two parts. The first section addresses the need for
a city-wide comperhensive plan, and the second section addresses those specific
issues submitted by your NPO.
A CITY-WIDE PLAN
As you are aware, there is a continued frustration over the fact that the
existing NPO plans will be repealed, and replaced with a city-wide comprehensive
plan. It is becoming more evident that the need for one city-wide plan is
crucial for Tigard's planning efforts. The following reasons are cited, although
there are many rationales behind this thought.
First, the City needs to set policy for all aspects of land use issues. The
current NPO plans speak to single family and multiple family areas, location of
commercial areas and street standards, but fail to direct the Ctiy on facilities
planning (e.g. , sewer, drainage, etc. ) , future road improvemetns, urban expansion,
coordination with other agencies and the implementation measures that must be
considered to keep all of these "growing pains" at the least cost to the citizens.
Second, all of the seven NPO plans claim that Tigard will grow to a population
of 115,000 people. However, none of the plans indicate when this will happen,
if ever, and what physical and geographical constraints will be used to permit
such a population. Or, on a facetious note, do we care? Again, the City needs
to set a policy direction city-wide.
Third, the City believes that many land use issues affect the City as a whole
and the NPO's could be the bodies that could assist the city in resolving these
issues. At a minimum these include: redevelopment of land both residential
and commercial , economic development, transportation, parks and open space, etc.
There has been a lack of city-wide planning in recent years, and the City fears
that if the necessary systems and review processes are not in line, each develop-
ment could result in a headache for all concerned. This could potentially
discourage future economic development in the City.
. . . Continued . . .
12755 S.W.ASH P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171
CHRIS VANDERWOOD
November 2, 1982
Page Two
NPO #S DISTRICT MAP ISSUES
After reviewing your submitted revisions, we believe that most of your proposed
changes have merit and will be incorporated into the City's district working
map. The specific calculations have not been completed, however, at first
glance it appears that the density calculations will not be substantially
altered.
The only proposed change that of is uncomfortable with at this time is the
requested change from C-N to R-7 on the corner of Hall and Bonita. Due to the
complexity of this issue, we believe that it should be resolved at the Council
level as soon as possible. It is really a separate issue from the rest of the
City's comprehensive planning efforts. We urge you to continue to work with
Liz Newton on this matter.
The remaining question staff has concerning your submitted comments is your
claim that Colony Creek and Waverly Meadows are "already surrounded by higher
densities." Colony Creek currently abuts other single family residences on
large lots that will eventually redevelop to their density capacity once the
market permits such changes. In addition, Waverly Meadows abuts Bonita Firs
to the west, which is the only development in close proximity to Waverly Meadows.
The remaining land abutting Waverly Meadows is either vacant or will be redeveloped
as the need occurs.
If you have any further questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
CITY OF TIG?RD
eremy�M. Coursolle
ssociate Planner
JMC cmv
1.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MAYOR WILBUR BISHOP
DATE: NOVEMBER 22 , 1982
3.
a
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO PARKS & RECREATION BOARD
t
It has been the City' s policy in the past to seek recommendation
from the School Board for appointment of the ninth member to the
Parks and Recreation Board.
The S,hool Board has recommended that the City appoint Pat Biggs
as the ninth member to the Parks and Recreation Board. As Mayor
I concur with this recommendation, and request that the City
Council take formal action at the November 22 , 1982 , regular
City Council meeting, and appoint Ms . Pat Biggs to the vacant
position on the Parks and Recreation Board. x
WAB dkr
3
's
s
's
i
c
t
f
E
i
i
#f�
i
ip
4
{
f4
{
A
l
N5MM-�
F�
C■ 1'
November 15 , 1982 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
Councilor Elect Ima Scott
14873 S.W. 106th Ave.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Ima,
At your request I have researched the. status of the
Senior Center. According to Administrative Assistant
Linda Sargent, the facility is owned by the City of Tigard
It is leased at no cost to Loaves and Fishes Center, Inc.
which operates the facility at no cost to the City. I
have enclosed a copy of a letter from the President of
Loaves and Fishes which lists the members of the Executive
Committee of the Board of Directors. Your final question
concerned the budget for the facility. Your best source
for this information is the Loaves and Fishes Organization.
i
William A. onahan
Director of Planning and. Development
WAM:dmj
cc: Tigard City Council
i
{
12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171
1
_ - l
1
FISKY C'ENTE'R.,, INC.
Cal
MEA LS-ON-WHEELS, MEALS AT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS
AND SOCIAL SERVICES FOR OUR COMMUNITY'S ELDERS
6125 S.E. 52nd Avenue Portland, Oregon 97206 (503) 777-2424
' November 1982
I
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS "I come to Loaves & Fishes for companionship , fellowship,
Lawrence Rennett good cheer and conversation--sorely needed by one living
President alone. We rejoice and sympathize with each other. The
Pat Whiting trips are a welcome escape from monotony. We give thanks
Vice President for the balanced meal . "
Harold Rose -Stella, a Loaves & Fishes Center Participant
Secretary
Betty Hansen Dear Friend,
Treasurer
Eleanore Baxendale For thirteen years, senior adults in Multnomah, Clackamas
Ruth Drurey and Washington Counties have given thanks for the Loaves
Frank Eiseman & Fishes program.
Hugh Gallagher Meals-on-Wheels volunteers deliver hot, nutritious meals
Walter Hegg to the homebound. Senior citizen loneliness and isolation
Jean Higginbotham have been reduced by offering them an opportunity to take
part in community activities and to eat well in a social
Catharine Krieger setting at over thirty neighborhood centers . Stella and
Vern Pearson 16 ,000 other senior adults pay what they can afford for
RusaellPayton their meals . But this year, with decreases in government
funding, we can' t maintain our grassroots efforts without
Randolph Riggs your help. More than ever before, we need your support.
Joel Taylor
Please take a moment right now to read the enclosed bro-
RlchardMastbrook chure . Then join me in starting the holidays with a gift
Executive Director to Loaves & Fishes Centers , Inc . I ' ve enclosed a reply
envelope for your convenience. All contributions are tax-
deductible and deeply appreciated. For the many people
you help with your gift, thank you.
Sincerely,
_P • L
Lawrence Rennett
President
Loaves & Fishes is .
People Caring about People ,
Sowing the Good Seed of Hope , Dignity, Self-Reliance .
y
t`
November 18, 1982
C17YOFT167ARD
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
i
Mrs . Geraldine L. Ball
Secretary-Treasurer
DJB Inc. t
11515 S .W. 91st Ave.
Portland, Oregon 97223
t
Dear Mrs. Ball,
I am writing this in response to your letters dated November
10, 1982. The property referred to as Tax Lots 4800, 4900 ,
5000, 5100, 5700 and 5800, Map ISl 36DD and TL 100, 1200,
1301, 1400 and 1700, Map 2S1 1AA are within the Tigard Urban
Growth Boundary and the Tigard City Limits. The City has 5
no intention of removing any of the above mentioned tax lots
from the City limits or Urban Growth Boundary.
In reference to your question on tax lot 401 Map 2Sl 1AA,
there is no Tax Lot 401 on Map 2S1 1AA. However, there is
a Tax Lot 400 on Tax Map 2S1 1AA which is occupied by Land-
mark Ford. That property was not annexed to the City in 1981
because no petition for annexation of that property was re-
ceived by the City. In fact, DJB Inc. specifically requested
that the City not include Tax Lot 400 on Map 2S1 1AA in that
annexation as the Ford Motor Company was not interested in
being annexed to the City at that time.
s;
Please be assured that before any Comprehensive Plan amendments
occur on your property, you must sign an application request
as the owner and be notified by the City of the application
request. Even if the City initiates a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment you will still be notified as the property owner.
z
I appreciate your concern for the disposition of your property.
If I can answer any additional questions please feel free to
contact me.
i
Sincerely, E
William A. Monahan
Director of Planning & Development
t
WAM:dmj
cc: City Council
12755 S.W.ASH P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171
^ DJB INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 U.S.A. (503) 639••2900 �
DEL W,BALL% L4 L
s
S.ec-Tee zd.
Novem eia 1.5p 1982 - 7:76ARD C3TV COUIJC7L
J.tem. open Ag"zda ire p4xca di zq-'ejzaracLe
[14. P1a cm and Caww -ew - J ARz-i d e at
!7 name iz Ce4a tdi nz L. [3a-t4 11515 S. U. 91-6.t Av nV--v Ti�rLcd; and 3 am �LeyvLeJselLt
g v;3s frac. and nup&-A pa zzono-U-y.
J aoa tieadirur th iz za Vca may have a c fv and ,.ae a Pia and haue a r aju�.
(rhe l rou& Ztjze .the 1ot&"zngqu e4t.i an a araarvene_d:
?.
3.6 oa LT. L. 4800, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5700 and 5800, Nap 1 S 1 36 DD
and K. L. ;'00, ll e. 1301; 1400 and 17.00, Nap 2 S 1 1 AA, as ahozm on �zaJe a4.-'
handing yo w-tA otm pit aw� oatlined in A ed, .in the- Cite of- T.i�u ;' [ ,C4
2. Ja th" fvr oy:se�I .ciz .the UALean. G.Lor rth B'a uzdaiu*?�L-o
3. Ja it .the .irLt�rc .ta hcw.e the fz"P� J-uz t mom+-o'n ed "-nzo red fizom -the C--'-4
4o J.6 it .the � .ta haue .this fAopz&tg nemaved �iaarn the LfiLBaJa G.Lor�th [3awrdan�.a
y'1 C
5. ,.s .the rLea coxa -r-t Z6 Z eros ,zemaLred ova ha✓s Leen m uz ✓n asi hat z a ULe Y.oc%e<t. +ra-�u-0-
.ta og4a l a SeljL Se zu4 � zo A� L.t zz zmldjU71lLPl� ��'
nU
6. JA n o4. &hi� i s it .to " .Lenaaved on l,,icrg has `t 4eea A"toved.T ri o
4fe- aA .that .thi..a and a?e othe-L rLerna� and andt<rmz .tapet� with .the zgpY
Matz IT S 1* 36 DD and .the .copy aA llo fz 2 S 1 1 A4, Zoth tx,6 z d Am -the
Dzp,t, 4 tiazhingtm County on Novei� 10, 1982, and handdta luau .this euen iizgs
4e made paa t ol- .the a4 oA T uuaiad iseea�d.
DA Inc.
Z-7'4z" oe �0,�pyf
G.ezaedirae L. 13a��-Sec-T.LP.ad.
i
• I
I
3 U.S.A.
�' ", o
D.)-S INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND.OREGON 9722p >,
� (503) 639-2900 ��•�� °
Nolrez&et 1'0, 1.982
l'7n. [J.i,?_2ia, flonahan, P.2� 8 Dwz-P,ofzme-►zt /7i�ectc�vt
72755 S. 9. A6h S.ttttt.-e�
T4:9,a rd, Ome- a 97223
Mes haVz sated .the a.ttezf-1-oR a- y-auL j
opt Zmrenrze a zazzarta .to .the /.a-at .that Tax Lot
4011 - nap, 2 S 1 1 M arca wutexed .into .the Ci ttg
v-A TZjaz d .ut 1980 - get yo'un malaa zan UJr -t
.ah, .i t a s teuz2 za .the Caw'tY.
GJ.e t rap teiL -ta Z a GPJLta-uz .that y-au rate MJMe 0
,tfy�a .on Y-ou/t rnal•.,a.
I
Dp
Garza Pd ire L. Ba-U
Sad-T.reaa.
P.. S. At to wad .t a jw L-i'an o�f ogtai_r..ed IAa=
Ija.ahisLgtcrn CourLt� an luov. 70, 1982 wh i.rh u uri-t2 p
,,t,- .ahowra Tax Lot 401 as .in .thz Ci-t# and Tax Viz.
Lat 400 as .the ono .tax -Pat .ut .the CawL4,- -
i
-3f
41 1 -
rot 1[
1% 3nN3AV
alcil -0
o
r•'. A f1 r\1
V I
-1 u) l
u Ln
• li rn t� � •r. '� i M ry, C\i t•7 (`J ' N �-